The URL can be used to link to this page

2018, 02-27 Regular MeetingAGENDA SPOKANE VALLEY CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING FORMAL FORMAT MEETING Tuesday, February 27, 2018 6:00 p.m. Spokane Valley City Hall Council Chambers 10210 E Sprague Avenue Council Requests Please Silence Your Cell Phones During Council Meeting CALL TO ORDER INVOCATION: Pastor Mike Szott, Living Hope Community Church PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL APPROVAL OF AGENDA INTRODUCTION OF SPECIAL GUESTS AND PRESENTATIONS COMMITTEE, BOARD, LIAISON SUMMARY REPORTS MAYOR'S REPORT PROCLAMATION: Developmental Disabilities Awareness Month PUBLIC COMMENTS: This is an opportunity for the public to speak on any subject except those on this agenda as action items. (Action items include public hearings, and those items under NEW BUSINESS. Public Comments will be taken on those items at the time those items are discussed.) When you come to the podium, please state your name and city residence for the record and limit remarks to three minutes. 1. CONSENT AGENDA: Consists of items considered routine which are approved as a group. Any member of Council may ask that an item be removed from the Consent Agenda to be considered separately. Proposed Motion: I move to approve the Consent Agenda. a. Approval of claim vouchers on Feb 27, 2018 Request for Council Action Form, Total: $3,962,840.05 b. Approval of Payroll for Pay Period Ending January 31, 2018: $519,185.11 c. Approval of Payroll for Pay Period Ending February 15, 2018: $329,560.63 d. Approval of January 30, 2018 Council Meeting Minutes, Study Session e. Approval of February 6, 2018 Council Meeting Minutes, Study Session NEW BUSINESS: 2. Second Reading Ordinance 18-003, Street Standards- Henry Allen, Micki Harnois [public comment] 3. Second Reading Ordinance 18-004, Subdivision Regulations- Marty Palaniuk [public comment] 4. Second Reading Ordinance 18-005 Spokane Housing Authority, Reauthorization — Erik Lamb [public comment] 5. Motion Consideration: Appleway Trail — Mike Basinger, Gloria Mantz, Mike Stone [public comment] PUBLIC COMMENTS: This is an opportunity for the public to speak on any subject except those on this agenda as action items. (Action items include public hearings, and those items under NEW BUSINESS. Public Comments will be taken on those items at the time those items are discussed.) When you come to the podium, please state your name and city residence for the record and limit remarks to three minutes. Council Agenda 02-27-18 Formal Format Meeting Page 1 of 2 ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS 6. Potential Grant Opportunities (FMSIB) — Adam Jackson 7. Crave Contract — Lesli Brassfield, Mike Basinger 8. Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins INFORMATION ONLY (will not be reported or discussed): 9. Department Reports CITY MANAGER COMMENTS ADJOURNMENT General Meetinji Schedule (meeting schedule is always subject to change) Regular Council meetings are generally held every Tuesday beginning at 6:00 p.m. The Formal meeting formats are generally held the 211 and 41 Tuesdays. Formal meeting have time allocated for general public comments as well as comments after each action item. The Study Session formats (the less formal meeting) are generally held the 1St 3'=d and 5r'—' Tuesdays. Study Session formats DO NOT have time allocated for general public comments; but if action items are included, comments are permitted after those specific action items. NOTICE: Individuals planning to attend the meeting who require special assistance to accommodate physical, hearing, or other impairments, please contact the City Clerk at (509) 921-1000 as soon as possible so that arrangements may be made. Council Agenda 02-27-18 Formal Format Meeting Page 2 of 2 Spokane Valley IJJ ro ct tmttion City of Spo4ne Valley, Washington Deve(opmenta(Oisa6ilties Awareness ,Month WHEREAS, An intellectual or developmental disability affects more than 7,000 people in Spokane County; and WHEREAS, Public Awareness about the needs of people with developmental disabilities can help the City of Spokane Valley feel more welcoming; and WHEREAS, People with developmental disabilities are a vibrant part of our community, improving the quality of life for all; and WHEREAS, By a 1987 Presidential Proclamation, the month of March has been designated "Developmental Disabilities Awareness Month" and WHEREAS, The Arc of the United States, the nation's leading volunteer -based organization advocating for and with people with developmental disabilities and their families, and its affiliate, The Arc of Spokane, seek to encourage greater social inclusion of people with developmental disabilities in our community through a variety of public awareness and education initiatives. NOW, THEREFORE, 1, Rod Higgins, Mayor of the City of Spokane Valley, on behalf of the Spokane Valley City Council and the citizens of the City of Spokane Valley, do hereby proclaim the month of March, 2018, as Developmental Disabilities Awareness Month and 1 urge citizens to give full support to efforts toward enabling people with developmental disabilities to live full and productive lives of inclusion in our communities. Dated this 27th day of February, 2018. L.R. Higgins, Mayor CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: February 27, 2018 Department Director Approval: El Check all that apply: ® consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Approval of the Following Vouchers: VOUCHER LIST VOUCHER NUMBERS 01/25/2018 43740-43757 01/25/2018 43758-43773 01/25/2018 01/30/2018 01/31/2018 01/31/2018 01/31/2018 02/01/2018 02/01/2018 02/01/2018 02/06/2018 02/08/2018 02/08/2018 02/08/2018 02/09/2018 02/13/2018 02/15/2018 43774-43796 7536-7543 43797-43811 43812-43815 43816-43849 43850-43854 (-voided 43850) 43855 43856-43859 7544-7547 6178, 6180, 6182, 6190-6193, 6195, 6202, 43860, 43861 43862-43865; 86367; 22672722 43866-43898; 3661537; 3683155 43899-43921 7548-7556 43922-43985 TOTAL AMOUNT $230,025.85 $22,492.92 $104,395.02 $1,666.50 $16,394.76 $37,960.32 $63,653.34 $1,563.68 $1,918,09 $5,155.73 $99.00 $363,943.61 $29,292.05 $1,914,241.60 $104,347.51 $1,391.00 $1,065,799.07 GRAND TOTAL: $3,962,840.05 Explanation of Fund Numbers found on Voucher Lists Other Funds 101 — Street Fund 103 — Paths & Trails 105 — Hotel/Motel Tax 106 — Solid Waste 120 - CenterPlace Operating Reserve 121— Service Level Stabilization Reserve 122 — Winter Weather Reserve 204 — Debt Service 301 — REET 1 Capital Projects 302 — REET 2 Capital Projects 303 — Street Capital Projects 309 — Parks Capital Grants 310 — Civic Bldg Capital Projects 311 — Pavement Preservation 312 — Capital Reserve 314 — Railroad Grade Separation Projects 402 — Stormwater Management 403 — Aquifer Protection Area 501 — Equipment Rental & Replacement 502 — Risk Management #001 - General Fund 001.011.000.511. City Council 001.013.000.513. 001.013.015.515. 001.016.000. 001.018.013.513. 001.018.014.514. 001.018.016.518. 001.032.000. 001.058.050.558. 001.058.051.558. 001.058.055.558. 001.058.056.558. 001.058.057.558 001.076.000.576. 001.076.300.576. 001.076.301.571. 001.076.302.576. 001.076.304.575. 001.076.305.571. 001.090.000.511. 001.090.000.514. 001.090.000.517. 001.090.000.518. 001.090.000.519. 001.090.000.540. 001.090.000.550. 001.090.000.560. 001.090.000.594. 001.090.000.595. City Manager Legal Public Safety Deputy City Manager Finance Human Resources Public Works CED - Administration CED — Economic Development CED — Development Services -Engineering CED — Development Services -Planning CED — Building Parks & Rec—Administration Parks & Rec-Maintenance Parks & Rec-Recreation Parks & Rec- Aquatics Parks & Rec- Senior Center Parks & Rec-CenterPlace General Gov't- Council related General Gov't -Finance related General Gov't -Employee supply General Gov't- Centralized Services General Gov't -Other Services General Gov't -Transportation General Gov't -Natural & Economic General Gov't -Social Services General Gov't -Capital Outlay General Gov't -Pavement Preservation RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to approve attached list of claim vouchers. [Approved as part of the Consent Agenda, or may be removed and discussed separately.] STAFF CONTACT: Chelsie Taylor, Finance Director ATTACHMENTS: Voucher Lists vchlist 01/25/2018 10:39:48AM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: 1 Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 43740 1/25/2018 000444 ARCTIC LIGHTING & ELECTRIC 43741 1/25/2018 004231 BELSBY ENGINEERING 43742 1/25/2018 000683 DAVID EVANS & ASSOCIATES 43743 1/25/2018 000734 DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION 43744 1/25/2018 000746 EMPLOYMENT SECURITY DEPT 43745 1/25/2018 003261 FEHR & PEERS 43746 1/25/2018 000002 H & H BUSINESS SYSTEMS INC. 43747 1/25/2018 002384 IMS INFRASTRUCTURE MGMT. LLC 43748 1/25/2018 006457 JH LANDWORKS LLC 43749 1/25/2018 003959 MAX J KUNEY CO 43750 1/25/2018 000293 MORAN FENCE INC. Fund/Dept 718 -Ret 001.223.40.00 17389 001.058.055.558 414230 314.000.143.595 RE 46 JG6436 L011 402.402.000.531 000-217156-00-2 101.000.000.517 119555 314.000.143.595 AR59362 AR59363 AR59364 AR59365 AR60335 AR60716 12617-6 1646-1 PAY APP 31 7230-1 001.018.014.514 001.018.016.518 001.013.015.515 001.013.000.513 001.011.000.511 001.058.050.558 101.042.000.542 101.000.000.542 303.303.155.595 001.223.40.00 Description/Account Amount RETAINAGE RELEASE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 0143 -DESIGN SERVICES Total : Total : Total : DECEMBER 2017 DECANT CHARG Total : 4TH QTR 2017 UI TAX 0143 -TRAFFIC ANALYSIS 1,741.28 1,741.28 2,612.50 2,612.50 29,325.98 29,325.98 107.69 107.69 7,431.95 Total : 7,431.95 Total : COPIER COSTS: IT COPIER COSTS: HR COPIER COSTS: LEGAL COPIER COSTS: OPS/ADMIN COPIER COSTS: COUNCIL/CITY M( COPIER COSTS: PERMIT CTR Total : 2017 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PL Total : SNOW REMOVAL Total : 0155 - SULLIVAN RD WEST BRIDGE Total : INSTALL FENCE 6,482.00 6,482.00 20.58 63.64 177.44 223.41 554.30 278.52 1,317.89 3,895.00 3,895.00 5,875.08 5,875.08 54, 087.58 54,087.58 1,615.50 Page: 1 vchlist Voucher List 01/25/2018 10:39:48AM Spokane Valley Page: 2 Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 43750 1/25/2018 000293 000293 MORAN FENCE INC. (Continued) 43751 1/25/2018 000307 OFFICE OF THE STATE TREASURER 43752 1/25/2018 000308 SPOKANE CO PROSECUTING ATTY 43753 1/25/2018 000001 SPOKANE CO TREASURER 43754 1/25/2018 000854 SPW LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS DECEMBER 2017 DECEMBER 2017 110100188 1755.04 43755 1/25/2018 004783 STAPLES 3360716867 3360716869 43756 1/25/2018 000717 TRANSPO GROUP INC. 21354 43757 1/25/2018 006453 TYCO SIMPLEX GRINNELL 41114648 18 Vouchers for bank code : apbank Fund/Dept 001.016.000.589 001.016.000.589 303.000.222.595 303.303.123.595 001.058.056.558 001.058.057.558 303.000.259.595 001.090.099.594 Description/Account Amount STATE REMITTANCE Total : Total : CRIME VICTIMS COMPENSATION F Total : DECEMBER 2017 ENGINEERING Total : 0123 -LANDSCAPE DESIGN Total : OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES: COMM. DEV. Total : 0259 -ENGINEERING SVCS Total : LYNX DURESS AND MASS NOTIFIC Total : Bank total : 18 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers : 1,615.50 35,829.91 35,829.91 517.52 517.52 52,085.65 52,085.65 1,539.58 1,539.58 1,181.57 -787.71 393.86 10,139.42 10,139.42 15, 027.46 15,027.46 230,025.85 230,025.85 Page: 2 vchlist 01/25/2018 11:05:01 AM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: —3 —I ---- Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 43758 1/25/2018 006459 CARPENTER, AARON AND KIMBERLY 43759 1/25/2018 000322 CENTURYLINK 43760 1/25/2018 003274 EXCHANGE PUBLISHING LLC 43761 1/25/2018 001447 FREE PRESS PUBLISHING INC 43762 1/25/2018 000321 GREATER SPOKANE INC 43763 1/25/2018 006457 JH LANDWORKS LLC 43764 1/25/2018 000012 JOURNAL OF BUSINESS 43765 1/25/2018 001944 LANCER LTD 43766 1/25/2018 000652 OFFICE DEPOT INC. Fund/Dept PARCEL 55073.1752 303.303.123.595 JANUARY 2018 479605 479606 479607 479608 479610 479611 001.076.000.576 001.040.043.558 001.013.000.513 001.013.000.513 001.013.000.513 001.040.043.558 001.040.043.558 Description/Account Amount CIP 0123 - ROW ACQUISITION/TEM Total : 2018 PHONE SVCS: ACCT 509Z14-1 Total : LEGAL PUBLICATION LEGAL PUBLICATION LEGAL PUBLICATION LEGAL PUBLICATION LEGAL PUBLICATION LEGAL PUBLICATION 48193 001.040.043.558 LEGAL PUBLICATION 116219 001.011.000.511 Total : Total : 2018 REGIONAL DC FLY -IN - R HIGI 1646-2 101.000.000.542 SNOW REMOVAL 71415 001.040.042.558 2018 C BRANCH 0467821 0467914 995837405001 996583963001 996584326001 997176056001 997176207001 001.040.041.543 001.076.301.571 001.090.000.518 001.018.016.518 001.018.016.518 001.076.305.575 001.076.305.575 250.00 250.00 538.36 538.36 86.25 11.85 55.30 46.61 71.89 85.35 357.25 192.00 192.00 2,300.00 Total : 2,300.00 Total : Total : BUSINESS CARDS: E. AMSDEN BUSINESS CARDS Total : SMALL TOOLS/MINOR EQUIP: GEN OFFICE SUPPLIES: HR OFFICE SUPPLIES: HR OFFICE SUPPLIES: CENTERPLACE OFFICE SUPPLIES: CENTERPLACE Total : 2,173.44 2,173.44 79.95 79.95 38.09 131.13 169.22 30.52 70.28 47.85 10.11 201.72 360.48 Page: �I� vchlist 01/25/2018 11:05:01 AM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: / Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 43767 1/25/2018 001604 PACIFIC NW PAPER 186955 001.018.014.514 OFFICE SUPPLIES: COPY PAPER 575.55 Total : 575.55 43768 1/25/2018 000675 RAMAX PRINTING & AWARDS INC 30230 001.011.000.511 NAME PLATES 94.93 Total : 94.93 43769 1/25/2018 003407 RIGHT! SYSTEMS INC SI -155417 001.090.000.518 JUNIPER SUPPORT RENEWAL 1,224.10 SI -155444 001.090.000.518 RUCKUS AP AND CONTROLLER SI 816.50 Total : 2,040.60 43770 1/25/2018 005503 SALT DISTRIBUTORS INC, 2416 101.000.000.542 SALT- ICE KICKER 12,143.93 Total : 12,143.93 43771 1/25/2018 006458 SPOKANE COUNTY TREASURER 201802 001.090.000.514 SPOKANE CO VOTER REGISTRATI 20.00 Total : 20.00 43772 1/25/2018 006422 SUPPLYWORKS 424187854 001.033.000.518 SUPPLIES 87.39 424498814 001.033.000.518 SUPPLIES 244.87 Total : 332.26 43773 1/25/2018 001885 ZAYO GROUP LLC JANUARY 2018 001.090.000.518 NETWORK INFRASTRUCTURE ACC 253.25 JANUARY 2018 001.090.000.518 INTERNET SERVICE 611.70 Total : 864.95 16 Vouchers for bank code : apbank Bank total : 22,492.92 16 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers : 22,492.92 Page: c2� vchlist '01125/2018 3:19:08PM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page:5 y Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 43774 1/25/2018 000150 ALLIED FIRE & SECURITY 43775 1/25/2018 006402 ARAMARK UNIFORM & CAREER 43776 1/25/2018 000334 ARGUS JANITORIAL LLC 43777 1/25/2018 000030 AVISTA 43778 1/25/2018 003300 CAPITAL ONE COMMERCIAL 43779 43780 43781 43782 SVC1135958 1990398217 1990408580 1990419073 1990503032 INV02224 Dec 2017 Dec 2017 Dec 2017 1/25/2018 005214 DIVERSIFICATION INC, DBA WORKPOIN. 13072 1/25/2018 006454 EAGLES ICE ARENA 1/25/2018 000795 EARTHWORKS RECYCLING INC. 356990 1/25/2018 001732 GREATER SPOKANE SUBSTANCE 12/27 Skate 43783 1/25/2018 001635 ISS FACILITY EVENT SERVICES Dec 2017 Dec 2017 1250705 1250706 Fund/Dept 001.016.016.521 001.076.305.575 001.076.305.575 001.076.305.575 001.076.305.575 001.033.000.518 001.076.300.576 001.018.016.518 001.090.000.518 001.076.305.575 001.076.301.571 001.076.305.575 001.090.000.560 001.090.000.560 001.076.305.575 001.076.305.575 Description/Account Amount WORK ORDER 171227-0009 Total : SUPPLIES FOR CENTERPLACE SUPPLIES FOR CENTERPLACE SUPPLIES FOR CENTERPLACE SUPPLIES AT CENTERPLACE Total : JANITORIAL SERVICE Total : UTILITIES: PARKS MASTER AVISTA Total : SUPPLIES: IT, WELLNESS,CITY HA MONITORS FOR CONFERENCE RC 232.83 232.83 414.75 414.75 414.75 523.55 1,767.80 9,115.45 9,115.45 8,956.29 8,956.29 795.63 2,948.44 Total : 3,744.07 ROUND TABLES FOR CENTERPLA( 4,667.52 Total : 4,667.52 SKATING SESSIONS FOR WINTER Total : RECYCLING COLLECTION AT CP 1; Total : 2017 SOC SER GRANT REIMBURSI 2017 SOC SER GRANT REIMBURSI Total : EVENT SVCS AT CENTERPLACE EVENT SVCS AT CENTERPLACE Total : 108.00 108.00 20.00 20.00 435.19 1,001.14 1,436.33 26.34 26.34 52.68 Page: '1� vchlist 01/25/2018 3:19:08PM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 43784 1/25/2018 000132 MODERN ELECTRIC WATER CO 43785 1/25/2018 006460 NBS PROMOS, INC 43786 1/25/2018 001860 PLATT ELECTRICAL SUPPLY 43787 1/25/2018 003407 RIGHT! SYSTEMS INC 43788 1/25/2018 000709 SENSKE LAWN & TREE CARE INC. 43789 43790 1/25/2018 005969 SPOKANE SPORTS COMMISSION 19398834 19398835 44303 P392569 SI -155146 8210721 8230254 8230335 8231614 8232162 8233540 8233633 8236142 8236162 8236268 8236302 4th QTR 2017 1/25/2018 000404 SPOKANE VALLEY HERITAGE MUSEUM Dec 2017 Dec 2017 43791 1/25/2018 001083 STANDARD PLBG HEATING CONTROLS 56455 56581 43792 1/25/2018 001969 SUNSHINE DISPOSAL 1250436 Fund/Dept 309.000.227.595 309.000.227.595 001.076.305.575 001.076.305.575 001.076.266.594 001.033.000.518 402.402.000.531 402.402.000.531 001.033.000.518 402.402.000.531 001.016.016.521 001.033.000.518 001.016.016.521 001.033.000.518 001.016.016.521 001.033.000.518 105.000.000.557 105.000.000.557 105.000.000.557 001.076.305.575 001.076.305.575 101.042.000.542 Description/Account Amount UTILITIES: APPLEWAY TRAIL UTILITIES: APPLEWAY TRAIL Total : ADVERTISING BANNERS FOR CEN Total : SUPPLIES AT CENTERPLACE Total : AV PROJECT CENTERPLACE Total : CITY HALL WINTER SVCS FLAGGING SVC CONTACT: DEC 20 ROADSIDE LANDSCAPING SVC: DI CITY HALL WINTER SVCS FLAGGING SVCS: ON 12/29/17 DE-ICE, SNOW REMOVAL PRECIN( CITY HALL WINTER SVCS DE-ICING AT PRECINCT CITY HALL WINTER SVCS SNOW REMOVAL AND DE-ICING Al CITY HALL WINTER SVCS Total : 2017 LODGING TAX GRANT REIMB Total : 2017 LODGING TAX GRANT REIMB 2017 LODGING TAX GRANT REIMB Total : R-22 REFRIGERANT - 30# EA - WORK ORDER 29903 TRANSFER STATION PW Total : 40.40 55.82 96.22 352.10 352.10 151.19 151.19 963.97 963.97 429.76 530.94 6,527.33 2,913.72 382.98 1,414.40 6,984.96 100.00 395.00 680.00 1,392.64 21,751.73 28,900.00 28,900.00 75.00 5,020.00 5,095.00 4,560.46 128.38 4,688.84 431.26 Page: . vchlist 01/25/2018 3:19:08PM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 43792 1/25/2018 001969 001969 SUNSHINE DISPOSAL 43793 1/25/2018 000167 VERA WATER & POWER 43794 1/25/2018 003175 VISIT SPOKANE (Continued) 005338-007 028004-000 Dec 2017 43795 1/25/2018 000038 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF SPOKANE 0066893-1518-9 0580811-2681-3 0582460-2681-7 43796 1/25/2018 000487 YMCA OF THE INLAND NW 23 Vouchers for bank code : apbank 23 Vouchers in this report Dec 2017 Fund/Dept 309.000.227.595 309.000.227.595 105.000.000.557 402.402.000.531 402.402.000.531 001.033.000.518 001.076.302.576 Description/Account Amount Total : UTILITIES: APPLEWAY TRAIL UTILITIES: APPLEWAY TRAIL Total : 2017 LODGING TAX GRANT REIMB 431.26 26.00 78.79 104.79 8,594.13 Total : 8,594.13 WASTE MGMT: VACTORING WAST WASTE MGMT: MAINT SHOP DEC WASTE MGMT: CITY HALL DEC 201 Total : OPERATING EXPENSES NOT PAID Total : 1,331.07 179.05 351.79 1,861.91 1,302.91 1,302.91 Bank total : 104,395.02 Total vouchers : 104,395.02 vchlist 01/30/2018 8:09:24AM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: V r"1"--- Bank 'i Bank code : pk-ref Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 7536 1/30/2018 006462 COMMUNITY SECURITY COALITION PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 REISSUE DEPOSIT REFUND: GRE) 210.00 PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND GREAT ROOM/E 150.00 Total : 360.00 7537 1/30/2018 006463 EMERSON, DAYNA PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: FIRESIDE LOUI 210.00 Total : 210.00 7538 1/30/2018 006464 GARLOCK, DONNA PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 PARTIAL REFUND: JANUARY SWIN 40.00 Total : 40.00 7539 1/30/2018 006465 GRAHAM, CHRISTINA PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: FIRESIDE LOUI 500.00 Total : 500.00 7540 1/30/2018 006466 MERRILL LYNCH PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: ROOM 108 52.00 Total : 52.00 7541 1/30/2018 006467 NAH ' JOOM PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 CANCELLATION REFUND: MIRABE 243.00 Total : 243.00 7542 1/30/2018 000832 OXFORD SUITES OF SPOK. VALLEY PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: ROOM 109 52.00 Total : 52.00 7543 1/30/2018 004837 SPOKANE INDIA COMMUNITY PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: GREAT ROOM/. 209.50 Total : 209.50 8 Vouchers for bank code : pk-ref Bank total : 1,666.50 8 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers : 1,666.50 Page: --I---- vchlist 01/31/2018 9:14:30AM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 43797 1/31/2018 006402 ARAMARK UNIFORM & CAREER 43798 1/31/2018 001169 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY 43799 1/31/2018 004152 EVENT RENTS, LLC 43800 1/31/2018 001993 FISCH, PETE 43801 1/31/2018 000071 GOLMAN, SUE 43802 1/31/2018 000321 GREATER SPOKANE INC 43803 1/31/2018 000012 JOURNAL OF BUSINESS 43804 1/31/2018 001914 KIPP, RYAN 43805 1/31/2018 004630 MAY, KENDALL 43806 1/31/2018 001860 PLATT ELECTRIC SUPPLY 43807 1/31/2018 000324 SPOKANE CO WATER DIST#3 1990523911 1990534309 Jan 2018 34988-3 Expenses Expenses 116275 INV003301090 Expenses Expenses P470267 Jan 2018 43808 1/31/2018 001083 STANDARD PLBG HEATING CONTROLS 56477 Fund/Dept Description/Account 001.076.305.575 001.076.305.575 001.040.041.543 001.076.305.575 001.040.041.543 001.076.305.575 001.040.042.558 001.076.305.575 101.042.000.542 001.076.305.575 001.076.305.575 402.402.000.531 001.076.305.575 Amount SUPPLIES FOR CENTERPLACE SUPPLIES AT CENTERPLACE Total : PETTY CASH: 16312,13,15,16,17 Total : SUPPLY RENTALS FOR CENTERPL Total : EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT Total : EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT Total : 2018 MEMBERSHIP DUES/PUBLIC Total : ADVERTISING FOR CENTERPLACE Total : EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENTS Total : EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT Total : SUPPLIES AT CENTERPLACE Total : WATER CHARGES FOR DEC 2018 Total : ANNUAL MAINTAGREEMENT FOR Total : 445.21 445.21 890.42 77.98 77.98 38.08 38.08 519.08 519.08 43.98 43.98 3,583.34 3,583.34 1,510.00 1,510.00 5.44 5.44 32.00 32.00 80.23 80.23 110.02 110.02 8,221.81 8,221.81 Page: vchlist 01/31/2018 9:14:30AM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: / Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 43809 1/31/2018 003532 STERICYCLE COMMUNICATION SOLUT 8010731135 43810 1/31/2018 006178 WALTER E NELSON CO 43811 1/31/2018 000066 WCP SOLUTIONS 15 Vouchers for bank code : apbank 15 Vouchers in this report I, the undersigned, do certify under penalty of perjury, that the materials have been furnished, the services rendered, or the labor performed as described herein and that the claim is just, due and an unpaid obligation against the City of Spokane Valley, and that I am authorized to authenticate and certify said claim. Finance Director Date Council member reviewed: Mayor Date Council Member Date 340187 10480284 Fund/Dept 001.076.305.575 001.076.305.575 001.076.305.575 Description/Account Amount ANSWERING SERVICE FOR CENTE Total : SUPPLIES FOR CENTERPLACE Total : SUPPLIES FOR CENTERPLACE Total : 54.44 54.44 344.48 344.48 883.46 883.46 Bank total : 16,394.76 Total vouchers : 16,394.76 Page: •� vchlist 01/31/2018 9:43:32AM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: / / Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 43812 1/31/2018 000734 DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION 43813 1/31/2018 001253 GORDON THOMAS HONEYWELL 43814 1/31/2018 002955 JEWELL EXCAVATING & CONST 43815 1/31/2018 003595 NORMAN, JERRY 4 Vouchers for bank code : apbank 4 Vouchers in this report Fund/Dept R E -313 -ATB 80116056 101.042.000.542 R E -313 -ATB 80116065 101.042.000.542 Dec17 1042 reissue 11095 BLD -2017-2838 001.011.000.511 101.000.000.542 001.058.059.322 Description/Account Amount REIMBURSE TRAFFIC SVCS REIMB ROADWAY MAINT Total : GOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS SNOW REMOVAL Total : Total : REISSUE PERMIT REFUND BLD -20 Total : 7,385.06 18,275.93 25,660.99 5,193.33 5,193.33 7,055.00 7,055.00 51.00 51.00 Bank total : 37,960.32 Total vouchers : 37,960.32 Page: vchlist 01/31/2018 10:03:45AM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 43816 1/31/2018 003337 ARROW CONSTRUCTION SUPPLY INC 208367 43817 1/31/2018 002517 BROWN BEARING CO INC 43818 1/31/2018 002562 CD'A METALS 43819 1/31/2018 001880 CROWN WEST REALTY LLC 43820 1/31/2018 003255 DAY WIRELESS SYSTEMS 43821 1/31/2018 002604 DELL FINANCIAL SERVICES LLC 43822 1/31/2018 002920 DIRECTV INC 43823 1/31/2018 006469 DOTY, RICHARD 43824 1/31/2018 002075 ENVIROTECH SERVICES INC 43825 1/31/2018 003274 EXCHANGE PUBLISHING LLC 6228318 289169 290028 290061 290325 FEBRUARY 2018 598779 79336278 33234423615 55074.1666 CD201806258 CD201806263 CD201806265 480080 480081 480082 Fund/Dept 101.042.000.542 101.000.000.542 101.000.000.542 101.000.000.542 101.000.000.542 101.000.000.542 101.042.000.543 101.042.000.543 001.090.000.548 101.042.000.543 303.303.123.595 101.000.000.542 101.000.000.542 101.000.000.542 001.040.043.558 001.040.043.558 001.040.043.558 Description/Account Amount GRINDER - 5.5HP HONDA W/ DRUI1 Total : SMALL TOOLS/MINOR EQUIP: STRI Total : SUPPLIES FOR MAINTENANCE SH SUPPLIES FOR MAINTENANCE SH SUPPLIES FOR MAINTENANCE SH SUPPLIES FOR MAINTENANCE SH Total : COMMON AREA CHARGES FOR M/ Total : TOWER RENTAL Total : COMPUTER LEASE: 001-892217-00 Total : CABLE SERVICE FOR MAINTENAN Total : CIP 0123 - TEMPORARY CONSTRU Total : 1012 - ICE SLICER 1012 - ICE SLICER 1012 - ICE SLICER LEGAL PUBLICATION LEGAL PUBLICATION LEGAL PUBLICATION Total : Total : 1,958.40 1,958.40 88.95 88.95 50.16 347.47 53.93 90.57 542.13 317.03 317.03 210.22 210.22 1,050.24 1,050.24 62.24 62.24 750.00 750.00 5,627.22 5,571.06 5,602.89 16,801.17 73.47 70.31 75.05 218.83 Page: �� vchlist 01/31/2018 10:03:45AM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page:, '7— Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 43826 1/31/2018 000106 FEDEX 43827 1/31/2018 001447 FREE PRESS PUBLISHING INC 43828 1/31/2018 000007 GRAINGER 43829 1/31/2018 003362 INLAND GEAR 43830 1/31/2018 002466 KENWORTH SALES COMPANY 43831 1/31/2018 002203 NAPA AUTO PARTS 43832 1/31/2018 000662 NATL BARRICADE & SIGN CO 43833 1/31/2018 000652 OFFICE DEPOT INC. 43834 1/31/2018 004621 OREILLYAUTOMOTIVE STORES INC 43835 1/31/2018 001604 PACIFIC NW PAPER 6-062-10914 48196 48197 48198 48215 48216 48219 48220 48221 9667542675 27773 S POCM 12231776 SPOIN2652775 0538-843773 98019 998293823001 2862-242544 2862-242885 2862-245103 186752 Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 001.040.041.543 FED EX 1-8-2018 001.013.000.513 001.013.000.513 001.013.000.513 001.040.043.558 001.040.043.558 001.040.043.558 001.040.043.558 001.040.043.558 402.402.000.531 101.000.000.542 101.000.000.542 101.000.000.542 101.000.000.542 101.042.000.542 001.018.016.518 101.042.000.542 101.042.000.542 101.042.000.542 001.040.041.543 LEGAL PUBLICATION LEGAL PUBLICATION LEGAL PUBLICATION LEGAL PUBLICATION LEGAL PUBLICATION LEGAL PUBLICATION LEGAL PUBLICATION LEGAL PUBLICATION Total : Total : SMALL TOOLS/MINOR EQUIP: STO Total : REPAIR FOR SNOWPLOW #211 Total : SUPPLIES FOR SNOWPLOWS SUPPLIES FOR SNOWPLOWS Total : SUPPLIES FOR SNOWPLOWS Total : SMALL TOOLS/MINOR EQUIP: STRI Total : OFFICE SUPPLIES: HR Total : SUPPLIES FOR MAINTENANCE SH SUPPLIES FOR MAINTENANCE SH SUPPLIES FOR MAINTENANCE SH Total : OFFICE SUPPLIES: CPW 39.90 39.90 25.00 63.75 52.70 79.05 102.00 88.40 86.70 86.70 584.30 182.26 182.26 159.33 159.33 -235.19 308.96 73.77 68.01 68.01 30.59 30.59 14.87 14.87 24.03 38.07 26.09 88.19 156.67 Page: vchlist 01/31/2018 10:03:45AM Voucher List Spokane Valley /Lj Page: Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 43835 1/31/2018 001604 001604 PACIFIC NW PAPER 43836 1/31/2018 003653 PARTSMASTER 43837 1/31/2018 002616 ROADWISE INC 43838 1/31/2018 002520 RWC GROUP 43839 1/31/2018 002531 SIX ROBBLEES INC 43840 1/31/2018 000658 SPOKANE CO SUPERIOR COURT 43841 1/31/2018 000658 SPOKANE CO SUPERIOR COURT 43842 1/31/2018 000658 SPOKANE CO SUPERIOR COURT (Continued) 23238991 57189 57190 57200 57201 57212 65800N 65836N 65912N 66089N 66160N 66550N 66785N 66906N 67010N CM65836N CM66785N 5-815629 5-815974 3550.301 3550.332 3550.347 Fund/Dept 101.000.000.542 101.000.000.542 101.000.000.542 101.000.000.542 101.000.000.542 101.000.000.542 101.000.000.542 101.000.000.542 101.000.000.542 101.000.000.542 101.000.000.542 101.000.000.542 101.000.000.542 101.000.000.542 101.000.000.542 101.000.000.542 101.000.000.542 101.000.000.542 101.000.000.542 001.013.015.515 001.013.015.515 001.013.015.515 Description/Account Amount Total : SMALL TOOLS/MINOR EQUIP: SNO Total : LIQUID FREEZGARD CI PLUS LIQUID FREEZGARD CI PLUS LIQUID FREEZGARD CI PLUS LIQUID FREEZGARD CI PLUS LIQUID FREEZGARD CI PLUS Total : SUPPLIES: MAINTENANCE SHOP SUPPLIES: MAINTENANCE SHOP SUPPLIES: MAINTENANCE SHOP SUPPLIES: MAINTENANCE SHOP SUPPLIES: MAINTENANCE SHOP SUPPLIES: MAINTENANCE SHOP SUPPLIES: MAINTENANCE SHOP SUPPLIES: MAINTENANCE SHOP SUPPLIES: MAINTENANCE SHOP SUPPLIES: MAINTENANCE SHOP SUPPLIES: MAINTENANCE SHOP Total : SUPPLIES: SNOWPLOWS SUPPLIES: SNOWPLOWS FILE COMPLAINT FILE COMPLAINT FILE COMPLAINT Total : Total : Total : 156.67 234.81 234.81 6,133.00 6,198.77 6,161.44 6,159.67 6,157.88 30, 810.76 63.15 650.97 475.67 669.61 36.17 42.95 354.47 322.32 40.39 -650.97 -354.47 1,650.26 95.62 13.16 108.78 240.00 240.00 240.00 240.00 240.00 Total : 240.00 Page: —3--- vchlist 01/31/2018 10:03:45AM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: r4� Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 43843 1/31/2018 000658 SPOKANE CO SUPERIOR COURT 43844 1/31/2018 000658 SPOKANE CO SUPERIOR COURT 43845 1/31/2018 000658 SPOKANE CO SUPERIOR COURT 43846 1/31/2018 002540 SPOKANE HOUSE OF HOSE INC. 43847 1/31/2018 003318 TACOMA SCREW PRODUCTS INC 43848 1/31/2018 005732 TNT TRUCK PARTS 43849 1/31/2018 002363 WESTERN STATES EQUIPMENT CO 34 Vouchers for bank code : apbank 34 Vouchers in this report 3550.348 3550.264 3550.373 645348 24082919 24082972 S 37321 S 37438 IN000560844 Fund/Dept 001.013.015.515 001.013.015.515 001.013.015.515 101.000.000.542 101.000.000.542 101.000.000.542 101.000.000.542 101.000.000.542 101.000.000.542 Description/Account Amount FILE COMPLAINT FILE COMPLAINT FILE COMPLAINT Total : Total : Total : SUPPLIES FOR SNOWPLOWS Total : SMALL TOOLS/MINOR EQUIP: MAID SMALL TOOLS/MINOR EQUIPMENT Total : SUPPLIES: SNOWPLOW #205 SUPPLIES FOR #206 Total : ROAD GRADER RENTAL Total : Bank total : Total vouchers : 63,653.34 240.00 240.00 240.00 240.00 240.00 240.00 25.09 25.09 41.37 206.84 248.21 253.50 78.34 331.84 5,406.49 5,406.49 63,653.34 vchlist 02/01/2018 1:47:05PM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 43850 2/1/2018 001606 BANNER BANK 43851 2/1/2018 001606 BANNER BANK 43852 2/1/2018 001606 BANNER BANK 43853 2/1/2018 001606 BANNER BANK 43854 2/1/2018 001606 BANNER BANK 5 Vouchers for bank code : apbank 5 Vouchers in this report 8573 Dec 2017 Final 8573 Dec 2017 Final 8573 Dec 2017 Final 6368 Dec 2017 Final 6368 Dec 2017 Final 6368 Dec 2017 Final 8557 Dec 2017 Final 8557 Dec 2017 Final 8557 Dec 2017 Final 8599 Dec 2017 Final 8599 Dec 2017 Final 9713 Dec 2017 final 9713 Dec 2017 final 9713 Dec 2017 final Fund/Dept 001.018.016.518 001.090.000.518 001.018.016.518 Description/Account Amount SPOKANE DISCOUNT PC LIQUIDATIONS.COM AMAZON MARKETPLACE 001.018.016.518 VIZIAPPS 001.090.000.518 AVTECH SOFTWARE 001.013.015.515 ACT MRSC 001.011.000.511 001.011.000.511 001.011.000.511 001.076.301.571 001.076.301.571 Total : Total : LEADERSHIP SPOKANE GREATER SPOKANE VALLEY CHAP GREATER SPOKANE VALLEY CHAP Total : YMCA BOOST MOBILE 001.058.057.558 AMAZON MARKETPLACE 001.058.056.558 NORTH 40 001.058.056.558 ROSAUERS Total : Total : Bank total : Total vouchers : i�193 6‘ 74.96 1„94.98 Y/J11 :. 1,998.5 39.00 792.54 35.00 866.54 150.00 220.00 90.00 460.00 72.00 35.00 107.00 49.03 59.12 21.99 130.14 Page: fi vchlist 02/01/2018 2:17:38PM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: , r'I� Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 43855 2/1/2018 001606 BANNER BANK 1 Vouchers for bank code : apbank 1 Vouchers in this report I, the undersigned, do certify under penalty of perjury, that the materials have been furnished, the services rendered, or the labor performed as described herein and that the claim is just, due and an unpaid obligation against the City of Spokane Valley, and that I am authorized to authenticate and certify said claim. Finance Director Date Council member reviewed: Mayor Date Council Member Date 8573 Dec 2017 Final 8573 Dec 2017 Final Fund/Dept 001.018.016.518 001.090.000.518 8573 Dec 2017 Final 001.018.016.518 Description/Account Amount SPOKANE DISCOUNT PC LIQUIDATIONS.COM AMAZON MARKETPLACE Total : Bank total : Total vouchers : 74.96 1,714.57 128.56 1,918.09 1,918.09 1,918.09 Page: vchlist 02/01/2018 2:43:28PM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: /2 Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 43856 2/1/2018 001606 BANNER BANK 43857 2/1/2018 001606 BANNER BANK 43858 2/1/2018 001606 BANNER BANK 43859 2/1/2018 001606 BANNER BANK 4 Vouchers for bank code : apbank 4 Vouchers in this report 9713 Jan 2018 9713 Jan 2018 6368 Jan 2018 8573 Jan 2018 8573 Jan 2018 8573 Jan 2018 8557 Jan 2018 Fund/Dept 001.033.000.518 001.040.043.558 001.040.041.543 001.018.016.518 001.040.042.558 402.402.000.531 001.011.000.511 Description/Account Amount TRASH RECEPITCALS FOR CITY H FRED PRYOR CAREERTRACK Total : WA DEPT OF ENTERPRISE SERVIC Total : AMAZON.COM CONSTANT CONTACT GREEN RIVER COMMUNITY COLLE Total : SPOKANE HOME BUILDERS 4,044.96 398.00 4,442.96 408.38 408.38 142.38 0.01 42.00 184.39 120.00 Total : 120.00 Bank total : 5,155.73 Total vouchers : 5,155.73 Page: ---1'-- vchlist 02/06/2018 8:53:14AM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: l/ —1------ Bank code : pk-ref Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 7544 2/6/2018 006477 JONES, TERRY PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 CREDIT ON ACCOUNT/ACCOUNT C 10.00 Total : 10.00 7545 2/6/2018 006478 LENTZ, RICH PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 CREDIT ON ACCOUNT/ACCOUNT C 10.00 Total : 10.00 7546 2/6/2018 006476 TRENT, KIM PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 CREDIT ON ACCOUNT/ACCOUNT C 27.00 Total : 27.00 7547 2/6/2018 006479 WA STATE DEPT OF L & I PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: AUDITORIUM/4 52.00 Total : 52.00 4 Vouchers for bank code : pk-ref Bank total : 99.00 4 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers : 99.00 Page: •7'I-- vchlist Voucher List 02/08/2018 11:17:58AM Spokane Valley Page: 2?) Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 6178 2/5/2018 000165 DEPT OF RETIREMENT SYSTEMS Ben78404 001.231.15.00 PERS: PAYMENT 107,272.69 Total : 107,272.69 6180 2/5/2018 000699 WA COUNCIL CO/CITY EMPLOYEES Ben78406 309.231.21.00 UNION DUES: PAYMENT 2,861.90 Total : 2,861.90 6182 2/5/2018 006345 IDAHO CHILD SUPPORT RECEIPTING Ben78408 001.231.20.00 IDAHO CHILD SUPPORT RECEIPTING: 163.33 Total : 163.33 6190 2/5/2018 000048 VANTAGE TRANSFER AGENTS, 401A PLAN Ben78410 001.231.14.00 401A: PAYMENT 34,115.26 Total : 34,115.26 6191 2/5/2018 000682 EFTPS Ben78412 001.231.13.00 FEDERAL TAXES: PAYMENT 32,744.59 Total : 32,744.59 6192 2/5/2018 000210 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Ben78420 001.231.28.00 HEALTH REIMBURSEMENT ACCOUNT: 40,950.00 Total : 40,950.00 6193 2/5/2018 000145 VANTAGEPOINT TRANSFER AGENTS, 457 PL/ Ben78414 001.231.18.00 457 DEFERRED COMPENSATION: PAYI 8,156.49 Total : 8,156.49 6195 2/5/2018 000162 VANTAGE TRANSFER AGENTS, 401A EXEC PL Ben78416 001.231.14.00 401 EXEC PLAN: PAYMENT 637.50 Total: 637.50 6202 2/5/2018 000682 EFTPS Ben78422 001.231.13.00 FEDERAL TAXES: PAYMENT 1,026.08 Total: 1,026.08 43860 2/5/2018 000120 AWC Ben78400 001.231.16.00 HEALTH PLANS: PAYMENT 125,391.39 Ben78418 001.231.16.00 HEALTH PLANS (COUNCIL): PAYMENT 10,172.37 Total : 135,563.76 43861 2/5/2018 006468 EMPLOYMENT SECURITY COLLECTION Ben78402 101.231.20.00 WAGE ASSIGNMENT: PAYMENT 452.01 Total: 452.01 11 Vouchers for bank code : apbank Bank total : 363,943.61 11 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers : 363,943.61 Page: vchlist 02/08/2018 11:20:36AM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page-4— Bank 4 - Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 43862 2/8/2018 006382 AHBL INC 43863 2/8/2018 003300 CAPITAL ONE COMMERCIAL 43864 2/8/2018 002043 HDR ENGINEERING INC 43865 2/8/2018 000065 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 86367 1/31/2018 000409 DEPT OF REVENUE 22672722 2/1/2018 000409 DEPT OF REVENUE 6 Vouchers for bank code : apbank 6 Vouchers in this report Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 105781 303.303.123.595 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Jan 2018 1200097297 120093019 3364102299 3364102333 3364102339 Q4-2017 Q4-2017 001.090.000.518 MONITORS FOR CED 314.000.223.595 001.090.000.513 001.011.000.511 001.013.000.513 001.013.000.513 001.076.301.589 001.076.302.576 Total : Total : 0223 -PROJECT DEVELOPMENT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Total : OFFICE SUPPLIES: COUNCIL OFFICE SUPPLIES: EXECUTIVE OFFICE SUPPLIES: EXECUTIVE Total : LEASEHOLD EXCISE TAX Total : COMBINED EXCISE TAX RETURN 14,772.58 14,772.58 1,240.28 1,240.28 4,827.50 3,618.84 8,446.34 48.32 30.67 83.04 162.03 2,794.41 2,794.41 1,876.41 Total : 1,876.41 Bank total : 29,292.05 Total vouchers : 29,292.05 vchlist 02/08/2018 2:09:50PM Voucher List Spokane Valley z2_ Page: Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 43866 2/8/2018 000135 APA 43867 2/8/2018 000234 ARLT, SHANE 43868 2/8/2018 000173 BINGAMAN, GREG 43869 2/8/2018 000904 BRANCH, CAROLBELLE 43870 2/8/2018 003122 CALHOUN, MARK 43871 2/8/2018 001122 CAMERON-REILLY LLC 43872 2/8/2018 000571 CODE PUBLISHING COMPANY 43873 2/8/2018 000508 CONOCOPHILLIPS FLEET 096840-1817 Q1-2018 Q1-2018 Q1-2018 Q1-2018 PAY APP 5 59027 52970535 43874 2/8/2018 006327 DEVRIES MOVING PACKING STORAGE 83044 43875 2/8/2018 006469 DOTY, RICHARD 43876 2/8/2018 000278 DRISKELL, CARY 43877 2/8/2018 003274 EXCHANGE PUBLISHING LLC 55074.1666 EXPENSES 479604 480848 480849 480850 Fund/Dept 001.040.042.558 101.042.000.542 001.018.014.514 001.040.042.558 001.013.000.513 303.303.141.595 001.013.000.513 001.040.043.558 001.018.014.514 303.303.123.595 001.013.015.515 402.402.000.531 001.040.043.558 001.040.043.558 001.040.043.558 Description/Account Amount MEMBERSHIP 2018 M BASINGER Total : Q1-2018 CELL PHONE ALLOWANCI Total : Q1-2018 CELL PHONE ALLOWANCI Total : Q1-2018 CELL PHONE ALLOWANCI Total : Q1-2018 CELL PHONE ALLOWANCI Total : 0141 -CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT Total : ELECTRONIC CODE UPDATE Total : JANUARY 2018 FLEET FUEL BILL Total : LABOR FOR FURNITURE INSTALL) Total : CIP 0123 - REIMBURSEMENT FOR Total : EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT Total : ADVERTISING LEGAL PUBLICATION LEGAL PUBLICATION LEGAL PUBLICATION 473.00 473.00 135.00 135.00 135.00 135.00 135.00 135.00 135.00 135.00 2,657.50 2,657.50 913.92 913.92 1,101.01 1,101.01 781.25 781.25 92.50 92.50 672.02 672.02 34.50 66.36 67.15 78.21 Page: i'� vchlist 02/08/2018 2:09:50PM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: 03'2— Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 43877 2/8/2018 003274 EXCHANGE PUBLISHING LLC 43878 2/8/2018 001447 FREE PRESS PUBLISHING INC 43879 2/8/2018 001253 GORDON THOMAS HONEYWELL 43880 2/8/2018 000011 GREATER SPOKANE VALLEY 43881 2/8/2018 005191 HALEY, PAM 43882 2/8/2018 003297 HIGGINS, LEWIS ROD 43883 2/8/2018 000421 HOHMAN, JOHN 43884 2/8/2018 006473 INK TO MEDIA 43885 2/8/2018 001944 LANCER LTD 43886 2/8/2018 000472 LAWTON PRINTING (Continued) 480852 480853 480854 48192 48235 48236 48237 48238 48239 Jan 18 1042 BUSINESS CONNECTIOI Q1-2018 EXPENSES Q1-2018 Q1-2018 3210 0468058 0468140 41444 Fund/Dept 001.040.043.558 001.040.043.558 001.040.043.558 402.402.000.531 001.040.043.558 001.040.043.558 001.040.043.558 001.040.043.558 001.040.043.558 001.011.000.511 001.040.042.558 001.011.000.511 001.011.000.511 001.011.000.511 001.018.013.513 001.011.000.511 001.040.042.558 001.013.015.515 001.040.042.558 Description/Account Amount LEGAL PUBLICATION LEGAL PUBLICATION LEGAL PUBLICATION ADVERTISING LEGAL PUBLICATION LEGAL PUBLICATION LEGAL PUBLICATION LEGAL PUBLICATION LEGAL PUBLICATION GOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS Total : Total : Total : 2018 UPDATE - BOEING IN WASH!, Total : Q1-2018 CELL PHONE ALLOWANCI Total : EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT Q1-2018 CELL PHONE ALLOWANCI Total : Q1-2018 CELL PHONE ALLOWANCI Total : DIGITAL PRINTING BUSINESS CARDS BUSINESS CARDS BUSINESS CARDS Total : Total : 121.66 75.84 66.75 510.47 75.20 77.35 77.35 91.80 81.60 90.10 493.40 4,779.10 4,779.10 35.00 35.00 135.00 135.00 40.00 135.00 175.00 135.00 135.00 12.69 12.69 95.21 38.09 133.30 1,336.06 Page: vchlist 02/08/2018 2:09:50PM Voucher List Spokane Valley 2--rPage: —3 -- Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 43886 2/8/2018 000472 LAWTON PRINTING 43887 2/8/2018 000652 OFFICE DEPOT INC. 43888 2/8/2018 006475 PEETZ, BRANDI 43889 2/8/2018 003014 RON TURLEYASSOC. 43890 2/8/2018 000601 SKRERC 43891 2/8/2018 000601 SKRERC 43892 2/8/2018 000230 SPOKANE CO AUDITORS OFFICE 43893 2/8/2018 000459 SPOKANE CO TITLE CO 43894 2/8/2018 000001 SPOKANE CO TREASURER 43895 2/8/2018 006413 THOMPSON, LINDA 43896 2/8/2018 002960 WICK, BEN 43897 2/8/2018 004895 WOOD, SAM (Continued) 41445 102916362001 Q1-2018 51460 2018 2018 JANUARY 2018 5-SP13996 42000464 51504151 Q1-2018 Q1-2018 Q1-2018 Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 001.040.042.558 ENVELOPES 001.013.015.515 001.011.000.511 001.090.000.518 001.040.042.558 001.040.042.558 001.040.043.558 303.303.123.595 001.016.000.554 001.016.000.523 001.011.000.511 001.011.000.511 001.011.000.511 OFFICE SUPPLIES: LEGAL Total : Total : 01-2018 CELL PHONE ALLOWANCI Total : ANNUAL MAINTENANCE AGREEME Total : 2018 REAL ESTATE MARKET FORU Total : 2018 REAL ESTATE MARKET FORU Total : RECORDING FEES Total : 0123 - PLANT INFO GUARANTEES Total : ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICE FEBR1 JANUARY 2018 HOUSING Total : Q1-2018 CELL PHONE ALLOWANCI Total : Q1-2018 CELL PHONE ALLOWANCI Total : Q1-2018 CELL PHONE ALLOWANCI Total : 1,339.33 2,675.39 45.02 45.02 135.00 135.00 1,033.60 1,033.60 55.00 55.00 55.00 55.00 1,538.00 1,538.00 326.40 326.40 20,702.07 134,244.81 154,946.88 135.00 135.00 135.00 135.00 135.00 135.00 Page: vchlist 02/08/2018 2:09:50PM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: Z`5 Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 43898 3661537 3683155 2/8/2018 002651 2/5/2018 000001 2/5/2018 000001 WOODARD, ARNE SPOKANE CO TREASURER SPOKANE CO TREASURER 35 Vouchers for bank code : apbank 35 Vouchers in this report 1, the undersigned, do certify under penalty of perjury, that the materials have been furnished, the services rendered, or the labor performed as described herein and that the claim is just, due and an unpaid obligation against the City of Spokane Valley, and that I am authorized to authenticate and certify said claim. Finance Director Date Council member reviewed: Mayor Date Council Member Date Q1-2018 JANUARY 2018 9290201263 Fund/Dept 001.011.000.511 001.016.000.515 001.016.000.521 Description/Account Amount Q1-2018 CELL PHONE ALLOWANCI Total : SPOKANE COUNTY SERVICES Total : LE CONTRACT BILLING JANUARY: Total : Bank total : Total vouchers : 135.00 135.00 203, 972.15 203,972.15 1,535,279.00 1,535,279.00 1,914,241.60 1,914,241.60 Page: �4- vchlist 02/09/2018 2:04:29PM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 43899 2/9/2018 001081 ALSCO 43900 2/9/2018 006402 ARAMARK UNIFORM & CAREER LSP01999940 LSP02005130 1990544709 1990555131 43901 2/9/2018 000444 ARCTIC LIGHTING & ELECTRIC SIGN -2017-0083 43902 2/9/2018 000326 CONSOLIDATED IRRIGATION #19 Jan 2018 43903 2/9/2018 006481 EMHO CONSTRUCTION BLD -2018-0139 BLD -2018-0140 43904 2/9/2018 000321 GREATER SPOKANE INC 43905 2/9/2018 000070 INLAND POWER & LIGHT CO 43906 2/9/2018 000388 IRVIN WATER DIST. #6 43907 2/9/2018 001635 ISS FACILITY EVENT SERVICES 116147 116414 2301 Jan 2018 1254905 1254908 1254916 43908 2/9/2018 006480 JA BERTSCH HEATING & COOLING BLD -2018-0069 Fund/Dept 001.016.016.521 001.016.016.521 001.076.305.575 001.076.305.575 001.040.043.322 001.076.305.575 001.040.043.322 001.040.043.322 001.076.305.575 001.040.042.558 101.042.000.542 001.076.300.576 001.076.305.575 001.076.305.575 001.076.305.575 001.040.043.322 43909 2/9/2018 005976 LAND EXPRESSIONS LLC 17-048 Retainage 309.223.40.00 Description/Account Amount FLOOR MAT SERVICE AT PRECINC FLOOR MAT SERVICE AT PRECINC Total : SUPPLIES FOR CENTERPLACE SUPPLIES FOR CENTERPLACE Total : PERMIT REFUND: SIGN -2017-0083• Total : UTILITIES: CP Total : PERMIT REFUND : BLD -2018-0139 PERMIT REFUND: BLD -2018-0140 Total : 2018 ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP DUES FEB 2018 BASE INVESTMENT/PUB Total : UTILITIES: JAN 2018 Total : UTILITIES: PARKS & PW JAN 2018 Total : JAN 2018 MONTHLY CLEANING AT EVENT SVCS AT CENTERPLACE EVENT SVCS AT CENTERPLACE Total : PERMIT REFUND: BLD -2018-0069 Total : RETAINAGE RELEASE: 2017 EDGE 24.12 24.12 48.24 445.21 445.21 890.42 150.50 150.50 63.98 63.98 199.00 199.00 398.00 750.00 3,583.34 4,333.34 448.93 448.93 199.00 199.00 7,849.60 15.80 47.41 7,912.81 113.00 113.00 3,515.02 Page: vchlist 02/09/2018 2:04:29PM Voucher List Page: 23 2 -- Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 43909 2/9/2018 005976 005976 LAND EXPRESSIONS LLC 43910 2/9/2018 000252 LOWE'S BUSINESS ACCOUNT 43911 2/9/2018 000132 MODERN ELECTRIC WATER CO 43912 2/9/2018 000709 SENSKE LAWN & TREE CARE INC. 43913 2/9/2018 005012 SPOKANE CO ENVIRONMENTAL Jan 2018 Jan 2018 Jan 2018 8239364 8239408 8241749 8242212 Feb 2018 43914 2/9/2018 001083 STANDARD PLBG HEATING CONTROLS 56664 (Continued) 43915 2/9/2018 006461 STATE PERMITS INC, ATTN: KELLY LEY BLD -2018-0182 43916 2/9/2018 006413 THOMPSON, LINDA 43917 2/9/2018 000167 VERA WATER & POWER 43918 2/9/2018 004754 WAPRO Expenses Jan 2018 2018 Renewal 43919 2/9/2018 000038 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF SPOKANE 0603194-2681-7 0604073-2681-2 43920 2/9/2018 000066 WCP SOLUTIONS 10488573 Fund/Dept 001.090.000.518 001.076.302.576 101.042.000.542 001.016.016.521 001.033.000.518 001.016.016.521 001.076.300.576 001.076.302.576 001.016.016.521 001.040.043.322 001.011.000.511 101.042.000.542 001.013.000.513 001.016.016.521 001.016.016.521 001.016.016.521 Description/Account Amount Total : 3,515.02 LATE FEE ON LOWE'S ACCOUNT Total : UTILITIES: PARKS JAN 2018 UTILITIES: JAN 2018 PW Total : DE ICE AND SNOW REMOVAL AT P CITY HALL WINTER SVCS DE ICE AT PRECINCT CONTRACT MAINT: PARKS JAN 20' Total : SPOKANE CO SEWER CHRGS: FEI Total : JAN 2018 MONTHLY MAINT PRECIt Total : PERMIT REFUND: BLD -2018-0182 Total : EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT Total : UTILITIES: JAN 2018 23.65 23.65 1,427.62 12,948.63 14,376.25 707.20 2,230.40 108.80 60,343.90 63,390.30 1,784.53 1,784.53 642.90 642.90 0.10 0.10 228.77 228.77 3,681.89 Total : 3,681.89 2018 RENEWAL C KOUDELKA Total : WASTE MGMT: CENTERPLACE WASTE MGMT: PRECINCT JAN 201 Total : 25.00 25.00 816.37 292.68 1,109.05 SUPPLIES FOR CENTERPLACE 549.44 Page: 2— vchlist 02/09/2018 2:04:29PM Voucher List Page: 21)-8— Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 43920 2/9/2018 000066 000066 WCP SOLUTIONS (Continued) Total : 549.44 43921 2/9/2018 002651 WOODARD, ARNE 23 Vouchers for bank code : apbank 23 Vouchers in this report I, the undersigned, do certify under penalty of perjury, that the materials have been furnished, the services rendered, or the labor performed as described herein and that the claim is just, due and an unpaid obligation against the City of Spokane Valley, and that I am authorized to authenticate and certify said claim. Finance Director Date Council member reviewed: Mayor Date Council Member Date Expenses 001.011.000.511 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 462.39 Total : 462.39 Bank total : 104,347.51 Total vouchers : 104,347.51 Page: vchlist 02/13/2018 8:37:35AM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: 2? A, Bank code : pk-ref Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 7548 2/13/2018 006482 ASEA MOMENTUM 2/13/2018 006483 BALFOUR, CATHLEEN 2/13/2018 004196 CISCO SYSTEMS 2/13/2018 006484 COSENS, LEW 2/13/2018 006448 DEVINE, BRAD 7549 7550 7551 7552 7553 7554 7555 7556 PARKS REFUND PARKS REFUND PARKS REFUND PARKS REFUND PARKS REFUND 2/13/2018 000086 INLAND EMPIRE UTILITY, COORDINATIN PARKS REFUND 2/13/2018 001262 MCKINLAY & PETERS 2/13/2018 006486 WINDERMERE VALLEY 2/13/2018 006487 WOLLETT, GARY 9 Vouchers for bank code : pk-ref 9 Vouchers in this report PARKS REFUND PARKS REFUND PARKS REFUND Fund/Dept 001.237.10.99 001.237.10.99 001.237.10.99 001.237.10.99 001.237.10.99 001.237.10.99 001.237.10.99 001.237.10.99 001.237.10.99 Description/Account Amount DEPOSIT REFUND: GREAT ROOM/: Total : DEPOSIT REFUND: ROOM 110 Total : DEPOSIT REFUND: ROOM 109 Total : DEPOSIT REFUND: ROOM 109 Total : DEPOSIT REFUND: FIRESIDE LOUI Total : DEPOSIT REFUND: GREAT ROOM/: Total : DEPOSIT REFUND: GREAT ROOM/: Total : DEPOSIT REFUND: GREAT ROOM/: Total : DEPOSIT REFUND: FIRESIDE LOUT Total : Bank total : 185.00 185.00 52.00 52.00 52.00 52.00 52.00 52.00 210.00 210.00 210.00 210.00 210.00 210.00 210.00 210.00 210.00 210.00 1,391.00 Total vouchers : 1,391.00 vchlist 02/15/2018 12:14:0 0 P M Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: 36'1 -- Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 43922 2/15/2018 000197 ACRANET 6001 43923 2/15/2018 002931 ALL WESTERN INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY 105797 43924 2/15/2018 003775 AM HARDWARE 40642 43925 2/15/2018 006403 AMERICAN TIRE DISTRIBUTORS INC S103676809 43926 2/15/2018 003337 ARROW CONSTRUCTION SUPPLY INC 208629 43927 2/15/2018 002973 BEBOUT, BOB 43928 2/15/2018 004439 BIRCH COMMUNICATIONS INC 43929 2/15/2018 002562 CD'A METALS 43930 2/15/2018 000322 CENTURYLINK 43931 2/15/2018 002572 CINTAS CORPORATION EXPENSE 25634031 292886 JANUARY 2018 606303493 606304803 606306102 606307468 606308818 Fund/Dept 001.018.016.518 101.000.000.542 001.033.000.518 101.042.000.542 101.042.000.542 001.040.043.558 001.076.305.575 101.000.000.542 001.090.000.518 101.042.000.543 101.042.000.543 101.042.000.543 101.042.000.543 402.402.000.531 43932 2/15/2018 001888 COMCAST Jan 18 -Feb 17 2018 001.090.000.518 Description/Account Amount EMPLOYEE BACKGROUND CHECK Total : SUPPLIES: SNOWPLOW PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Total : Total : TIRES & SUPPLIES FOR STREET Total : SUPPLIES: STREET DEPT Total : EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT Total : PHONE SERVICE AT CENTERPLAC Total : SUPPLIES: SNOWPLOWS CITY HALL PHONES SERVICES AT MAINT. SERVICES AT MAINT. SERVICES AT MAINT. SERVICES AT MAINT. SERVICES AT MAINT. INTERNET CITY HALL Total : Total : SHOP CONTI SHOP CONTI SHOP CONTI SHOP CONTI SHOP CONTI Total : 111.00 111.00 109.99 109.99 22.11 22.11 500.83 500.83 89.65 89.65 200.00 200.00 427.52 427.52 74.98 74.98 239.09 239.09 131.07 118.90 118.90 118.90 131.07 618.84 106.17 Total : 106.17 Page: �� vchlist 02/15/2018 12:14:OOPM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: 3/ 7 - Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 43933 2/15/2018 005966 COSTAR REALTY INFORMATION INC 26495807 43934 2/15/2018 000742 DCI ENGINEERS 114328 43935 2/15/2018 002604 DELL FINANCIAL SERVICES LLC 79354356 79358889 79378312 43936 2/15/2018 000999 EASTERN WA ATTORNEY SVC INC 43937 2/15/2018 003697 ELECTRIC LIGHTWAVE LLC 43938 2/15/2018 002157 ELJAY OIL COMPANY 43939 2/15/2018 002075 ENVIROTECH SERVICES INC 43940 2/15/2018 003682 EPIC LAND SOLUTIONS INC 43941 2/15/2018 000869 EVCO SOUND & ELECTRONICS 43942 2/15/2018 003274 EXCHANGE PUBLISHING LLC 43943 2/15/2018 001993 FISCH, PETE 112613 15152491 4271781 CD201806670 CD201806671 CD201806672 0118-0614 0118-0702 30462 480851 EXPENSES Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 001.040.042.558 COSTAR SUITE 311.000.252.595 001.090.000.548 001.090.000.548 001.090.000.548 001.013.015.515 001.090.000.586 101.000.000.542 101.000.000.542 101.000.000.542 101.000.000.542 0252 - ROW CONSULTANT Total : Total : COMPUTER LEASE: 001-8922117-0 COMPUTER LEASE: 3 YR WORKS? COMPUTER LEASE:001-8922117-0( Total : PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INTERNET SERVICE Total : Total : FUEL FOR SNOWPLOWS/MAINTEI Total : 1012 - ICE SLICER 1012 - ICE SLICER 1012 - ICE SLICER Total : 303.303.123.595 0123 -RW SERVICES 303.000.247.595 0247 -PARCEL ACQUISITION/RELO( Total : 107.000.246.594 303.303.123.595 101.043.000.542 PEG FUND - 0246 LEGAL PUBLICATION Total : Total : EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT Total : 5,426.59 5,426.59 2,100.00 2,100.00 862.93 2,286.44 1,050.24 4,199.61 85.00 85.00 235.73 235.73 3,463.48 3,463.48 5,645.93 5,569.19 5,565.45 16,780.57 3,539.36 5,411.60 8,950.96 24, 994.18 24,994.18 58.46 58.46 18.24 18.24 Page: vchlist 02/15/2018 12:14:0 0 P M Voucher List Page: _54 Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 43944 2/15/2018 005474 FREIGHTLINER NORTHWEST PC001401953:01 PC001403274:01 43945 2/15/2018 004853 HALVERSON NORTHWEST LAW GROUP 201902 43946 2/15/2018 001723 HEDEEN & CADITZ PLLC 43947 2/15/2018 002810 INLAND NW PARTNERS ASSOC 43948 2/15/2018 002466 KENWORTH SALES COMPANY 43949 2/15/2018 001944 LANCER LTD 43950 2/15/2018 004632 LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS 43951 2/15/2018 004187 LKQ KC TRUCK PARTS 43952 2/15/2018 001104 MCCAIN INC. 43953 2/15/2018 002259 MENKE JACKSON BEYER LLP 43954 2/15/2018 000636 MOORE IACOFANO GOLTSMAN, INC. 43955 2/15/2018 000662 NAT'L BARRICADE & SIGN CO 8659 JANUARY 2018 SPO I N2675987 SPOIN2687066 0468273 65566161 18-44038 INV0226425 INV0226666 462 52190 98131 Fund/Dept 101.000.000.542 101.000.000.542 001.013.015.515 001.013.015.515 001.040.042.558 101.000.000.542 101.000.000.542 Description/Account Amount SUPPLIES FOR SNOWPLOWS SUPPLIES FOR SNOWPLOWS Total : PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Total : PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ACCT Total : CITY MEMBERSHIP Total : SUPPLIES FOR SNOWPLOWS SUPPLIES FOR SNOWPLOWS Total : 001.040.043.558 BUSINESS CARDS 001.076.305.575 TELECOM SERVICES 101.000.000.542 SUPPLIES FOR #207 303.000.263.542 303.000.263.542 001.013.015.515 309.000.227.595 101.042.000.542 Total : Total : Total : 0263 -SIGNAL EQUIPMENT 0263 -SIGNAL EQUIPMENT Total : PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Total : APPLEWAY TRAIL - PINES TO EVE! Total : SUPPLIES: STREET DEPT 163.19 143.18 306.37 701.00 701.00 522.50 522.50 150.00 150.00 98.78 379.74 478.52 42.98 42.98 1,349.94 1,349.94 70.72 70.72 32,529.85 14,969.26 47,499.11 1,936.45 1,936.45 145.15 145.15 45.26 Page: r3! vchlist 02/15/2018 12 :14:0 0 P M Voucher List Page: J?_ Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 43955 2/15/2018 000662 000662 NAIL BARRICADE & SIGN CO (Continued) 43956 2/15/2018 000652 OFFICE DEPOT INC. 43957 2/15/2018 005049 PEDERSON, MICHAEL ROY 43958 2/15/2018 006317 PERROUX, CHRISTINA 43959 2/15/2018 001089 POE ASPHALT PAVING INC. 43960 2/15/2018 005968 PRECISE MRM LLC 43961 2/15/2018 000019 PURFECT LOGOS LLC 43962 2/15/2018 003407 RIGHT! SYSTEMS INC 43963 2/15/2018 002616 ROADWISE INC 102318522001 102916684001 103883369001 103883692001 103883693001 103894378001 105444482001 994242278001 994536309001 998410655001 JANUARY 2018 Fund/Dept 001.040.041.543 001.013.015.515 001.018.014.514 001.018.014.514 001.018.014.514 001.018.014.514 001.011.000.511 001.040.041.543 001.040.041.543 001.040.041.543 Description/Account Amount Total : OFFICE SUPPLIES: CPW OFFICE SUPPLIES: LEGAL OFFICE SUPPLIES: FINANCE OFFICE SUPPLIES: FINANCE OFFICE SUPPLIES: FINANCE OFFICE SUPPLIES: FINANCE OFFICE SUPPLIES: LEGISLATIVE OFFICE SUPPLIES: CPW OFFICE SUPPLIES: CPW OFFICE SUPPLIES: CPW 101.042.000.542 DEAD ANIMAL REMOVAL Total : Total : PARCEL 35231.1412 303.000.247.595 MOVING COSTS FOR PURCHASE Total : 45640 45641 I N200-1015671 46512 SI -155748 57283 57284 101.000.000.542 101.000.000.542 WINTER RESPONSE JAN 2018 WINTER RESPONSE 2017 Total : 101.000.000.542 DATA PLAN 001.040.043.558 NAME PLATES Total : Total : 001.090.000.518 VMWARE SUPPORT RENEWAL Total : 101.000.000.542 101.000.000.542 LIQUID FREEZGARD CI PLUS LIQUID FREEZGARD CI PLUS Total : 43964 2/15/2018 002288 SARGENT ENGINEERS INC. 31483 303.000.259.595 0259 -DESIGN SERVICES 45.26 50.80 16.00 66.57 34.79 67.55 32.57 16.53 23.14 75.82 284.15 667.92 1,400.00 1,400.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 26,066.64 391.86 26,458.50 250.00 250.00 259.76 259.76 8,446.86 8,446.86 6,134.78 6,145.45 12,280.23 1,978.94 Page: vchlist 02/15/2018 12 :14:0 0 P M Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: J� —5— Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 43964 2/15/2018 002288 002288 SARGENT ENGINEERS INC. (Continued) Total : 1,978.94 43965 2/15/2018 000709 SENSKE LAWN & TREE CARE INC. 8242459 001.016.016.521 MONTHLY SVCS AT PRECINCT: JAI 84.81 8245358 001.016.016.521 DC -ICE AT PRECINCT 108.80 Total : 193.61 43966 2/15/2018 004535 SHRED -IT USA LLC 8124070100 43967 2/15/2018 002531 SIX ROBBLEES INC 5-815491-1 5-815974-1 001.090.000.518 DOCUMENT DESTRUCTION 101.000.000.542 SUPPLIES: SNOWPLOWS 101.000.000.542 SUPPLIES: SNOWPLOWS Total : Total : 156.30 156.30 43.27 39.83 83.10 43968 2/15/2018 001892 SKILLINGS CONNOLLY INC 10922 303.000.259.595 0259 -ROW SVCS 702.54 Total : 702.54 43969 2/15/2018 000658 SPOKANE CO SUPERIOR COURT 3550.360 001.013.015.515 FILE COMPLAINT 240.00 Total: 240.00 43970 2/15/2018 000658 SPOKANE CO SUPERIOR COURT 3550.357 001.013.015.515 FILE COMPLAINT 240.00 Total : 240.00 43971 2/15/2018 000658 SPOKANE CO SUPERIOR COURT 3550.361 001.013.015.515 FILE COMPLAINT 240.00 Total : 240.00 43972 2/15/2018 000658 SPOKANE CO SUPERIOR COURT 3550.355 001.013.015.515 FILE COMPLAINT 240.00 Total : 240.00 43973 2/15/2018 000658 SPOKANE CO SUPERIOR COURT 3550.344 001.013.015.515 FILE COMPLAINT 240.00 Total : 240.00 43974 2/15/2018 000459 SPOKANE CO TITLE CO 200322 303.303.123.595 OWNER'S POLICY 21.76 5-SP14199 311.000.252.595 0252 - PLANT INFO GUARANTEE 326.40 5-SP14202 311.000.252.595 0252 - PLANT INFO GUARANTEE 326.40 Total : 674.56 43975 2/15/2018 000001 SPOKANE CO TREASURER RETRO -PAY 001.229.51.16 2016-2017 RETRO -PAY 835,776.00 Page: vchlist 02/15/2018 12:14:00 P M Voucher List Page:��-8� Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 43975 2/15/2018 000001 000001 SPOKANE CO TREASURER (Continued) Total : 835,776.00 43976 2/15/2018 000001 SPOKANE CO TREASURER 51504182 101.042.000.542 WORK CREW INVOICE JANUARY 2 6,515.70 934002134 001.016.099.594 Q4 2017 CADRMS 24,851.92 Total : 31,367.62 43977 2/15/2018 000065 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 3364102342 001.040.043.558 OFFICE SUPPLIES: COMM. DEV. 9.77 3364102360 001.040.043.558 OFFICE SUPPLIES: COMM. DEV. 6.48 3364102362 001.040.043.558 OFFICE SUPPLIES: COMM. DEV. 16.95 3364102367 001.040.043.558 OFFICE SUPPLIES: COMM. DEV. 207.61 3364102369 001.040.043.558 OFFICE SUPPLIES: COMM. DEV. 396.41 3364102371 001.040.043.558 OFFICE SUPPLIES: COMM. DEV. 13.12 3364102375 001.040.043.558 OFFICE SUPPLIES: COMM. DEV. 95.74 3364102377 001.040.043.558 OFFICE SUPPLIES: COMM. DEV. 8.38 3364102379 001.040.043.558 OFFICE SUPPLIES: COMM. DEV. 26.13 3364102380 001.040.043.558 OFFICE SUPPLIES: COMM. DEV. 487.09 Total : 1,267.68 43978 2/15/2018 006422 SUPPLYWORKS 427567649 001.033.000.518 SUPPLIES 270.52 Total : 270.52 43979 2/15/2018 004740 THOMSON REUTERS -WEST 837651411 001.013.015.515 SUBSCRIPTION CHARGES 797.69 Total : 797.69 43980 2/15/2018 000335 TIRE-RAMA 8040083685 101.042.000.542 TIRE SIPING FOR #202 43.52 Total : 43.52 43981 2/15/2018 001108 TRAFFIC PARTS INC 454652 303.000.263.542 0263 -SIGNAL EQUIPMENT 12,335.00 Total : 12,335.00 43982 2/15/2018 006474 TYPECRAFT INC 78578 001.013.000.513 BUSINESS MAILER 92.48 Total : 92.48 43983 2/15/2018 000158 WELCH COMER & ASSOC. INC 51060000-001 303.000.249.595 0249 -DESIGN SERVICES 3,908.67 Total : 3,908.67 43984 2/15/2018 002651 WOODARD, ARNE EXPENSES 001.011.000.511 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 52.32 Page: " vchlist 02/15/2018 12:14:00 P M Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 43984 2/15/2018 002651 002651 WOODARD, ARNE (Continued) Total : 52.32 43985 2/15/2018 001885 ZAYO GROUP LLC FEBRUARY 2018 001.090.000.518 INTERNET SERVICE 621.00 FEBRUARY 2018 001.090.000.518 NETWORK INFRASTRUCTURE AC( 253.25 Total : 874.25 64 Vouchers for bank code : apbank Bank total : 1,065,799.07 64 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers : 1,065,799.07 I, the undersigned, do certify under penalty of perjury, that the materials have been furnished, the services rendered, or the labor performed as described herein and that the claim is just, due and an unpaid obligation against the City of Spokane Valley, and that I am authorized to authenticate and certify said claim. Finance Director Date Council member reviewed: Mayor Date Council Member Date Page: a'. CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: February 27, 2018 Department Director Approval : Item: Check all that apply: ® consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Payroll for Pay Period Ending January 31, 2018 GOVERNING LEGISLATION: PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: BACKGROUND: Budget/Financial impacts: Employees Council Total Gross: $ 292,330.73 $ 5,475.00 $ 297,805.73 Benefits: $ 206,584.63 $ 14,794.75 $ 221,379.38 Total payroll $ 498,915.36 $ 20,269.75 $ 519,185.11 RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to Approve above payroll. [Approved as part of the Consent Agenda, or may be removed and discussed separately.] STAFF CONTACT: Raba Nimri CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: February 27, 2018 Department Director Approval : Item: Check all that apply: ® consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Payroll for Pay Period Ending February 15, 2018 GOVERNING LEGISLATION: PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: BACKGROUND: Budget/Financial impacts: Employees Total Gross: $ 272,489.37 $ 272,489.37 Benefits: $ 57,071.26 $ 57,071.26 Total payroll $ 329,560.63 $ 329,560.63 RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to Approve above payroll. [Approved as part of the Consent Agenda, or may be removed and discussed separately.] STAFF CONTACT: Raba Nimri DRAFT Attendance: Councilmembers MINUTES SPOKANE VALLEY COUNCIL MEETING STUDY SESSION Spokane Valley City Hall Council Chambers Spokane Valley, Washington January 30, 2018 Staff Rod Higgins, Mayor Pam Haley, Deputy Mayor Brandi Peetz, Councilmember Linda Thompson, Councilmember Ben Wick, Councilmember Sam Wood, Councilmember Arne Woodard, Councilmember Mark Calhoun City Manager John Hohman, Deputy City Manager Cary Driskell, City Attorney Erik Lamb, Deputy City Attorney Chelsie Taylor, Finance Director Mike Stone, Parks & Rec Director Bill Helbig, City Engineer Gloria Mantz, Engineering Manager Mark Werner, Police Chief Marty Palaniuk, Planner Morgan Koudelka, Sr. Administrative Analyst Henry Allen, Senior Engineer Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Mayor Higgins called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. ROLL CALL: City Clerk Bainbridge called the roll, all Councilmembers were present. Amended Agenda: It was moved by Deputy Mayor Haley and seconded, to approve the amended agenda. Vote by Acclamation: In Favor: Mayor Higgins, Deputy Mayor Haley, and Councilmembers Wick, Woodard, Peetz, and Wood. Opposed: Councilmember Thompson. Motion carried. 1. CONSENT AGENDA: consists of items considered routine which are approved as a group. Any member of Council may ask that an item be removed from the Consent Agenda to be considered separately. Proposed Motion: I move to approve the Consent Agenda. a. Approval of claim vouchers on Jan 30, 2018 Request for Council Action Form Total: $2,438,562.52 b. Approval of Payroll for Pay Period Ending January 15, 2018: $332,547.15 c. Approval of January 2, 2018 Council Meeting Minutes, Study Session d. Approval of January 9, 2018 Council Meeting Minutes, Formal Format e. Approval of January 16, 2018 Council Meeting Minutes, Study Session It was moved by Deputy Mayor Haley, seconded and unanimously agreed to approve the Consent Agenda. 2. Motion Considcration: Mayoral Appointmcnt, Iluman Rights Task For.,c — Mayor Iliggins 3. Motion Consideration: Waste Management Contract Amendment, Street -wear Fee — Morgan Koudelka, Erik Lamb, Henry Allen It was moved by Deputy Mayor Haley and seconded, to authorize the City Manager to finalize and execute the First amended and restated Comprehensive Garbage, Recyclables, and Compostables Collection Contract between the City of Spokane Valley and Waste Management of Washington, Inc. Deputy City Attorney Lamb explained that this is an amended and re -stated contract, and that Council will notice the entire contract, with red -line proposed changes related to the street -wear fee, is included in the packet because there are several changes throughout; that there was previously an administrative fee referenced throughout the document, and that term has been changed to city fee. Mr. Lamb also explained that since these services don't begin until April 1, 2018, if we were to do just an amendment, we'd have to manage Council Study Session: 01-30-2018 Page 1 of 6 Approved by Council: DRAFT two documents; and that this is simpler to have just one document, especially since this is a fee unrelated to the services provided. Mr. Lamb further explained that the amendments in this amended and re -stated contract are solely related to the street fee, along with some other minor changes, for example, updating the address of City Hall. Mr. Lamb stated that this is not meant to be an opening of the contract; that this is a street -wear fee unrelated to the services; he noted that the substantive provisions in the contract have been reviewed and discussed by Council over the last two years, and that the purpose of tonight's contract is for the amendments related to the street -wear fee. Senior Administrative Analyst Koudelka said that at Council's direction, staff applied a single percentage fee to capture as much of the $1.5 million savings as possible, that we achieved this through the competitive process, without impacting the rates; he said the majority of customer's rates, with few exceptions, will be equal to or less than they are currently; he noted that the option for customers to use their own cans has been eliminated, so customers will be using carts provided by Waste Management. Mr. Koudelka said he looked at the figures of what the rates were when Council originally approved this contract, and since that time the rates have actually decreased, and under the current methodology we still have some carryover from the state certificates and part of that is the recycling commodity credit; so when a residential customer has garbage service, there is a charge for garbage, for recycling, and a commodity credit that offsets the recycling charge; in August 2017 that commodity credit increased from $1.44 to $2.65; and he explained that had the effect of reducing residential customer's rates by $1.21. Mr. Koudelka further explained that if we were under that same methodology, this year moving forward it would swing considerably the other direction as the recycling market has dried up and there is difficulty finding suitable markets to take the recycling collections already out there; so in looking at that and comparing it to the rates when we adopted this agreement, the majority of the can customers would see a difference between .26¢ and .42¢ per month, an increase of about 2% or less on their bill, over the same period when the CPI increased a little over 2.7%, so the difference customers will be seeing is fairly small. Mr. Koudelka said the good thing about this moving forward is while we have a single rate that includes recycling, that means that although the costs associated with recycling are worked into the total rates, they are fixed and subject to the CPI increases; he also noted there was a small revenue shift to make everyone's reduction of a similar percentage reduction so we can capture the full difference moving forward by applying the same percentage rate, 12.5% to all service lines. Mr. Lamb noted that Senior Engineer Henry Allen will be the staff member in charge of administering the contract. Mayor Higgins invited public comments. Mr. Ed Pace, Spokane Valley: asked Council to please not apply the street wear fee but rather to vote against it; said he would rather see the contractor have the ability to pass that savings along to the customer or the city pass the savings along some other way; said he knows we need money for pavement preservation and road maintenance, but he would like to see that happen through spending cuts, and if expenses go up, we need to make cuts. Ms. Jaclyn Gallion, Spokane Valley: said she is not sure if she opposes or supports this; she has a family of ten and they don't have garbage service since it is expensive, so they haul their own; and she mentioned dropping the fees would be a benefit for some; that she knows roads are important, and would appreciate some kind of a balance. There were no further public comments. Council discussion included the need to fund road preservation with as little impact on citizens as possible; that concerning our budget we have a pay-as-you-go philosophy and not a use it or lose it philosophy; and the annual growth of our budgets is about 1%; that this is a complex subject and comment from Council with confirmation from staff, that these funds will not be spent on anything except the street O&M fund, with limited portion for administration; that staff cannot change the use of the proceeds as it is contained in the contract and any change would require Council approval. Mr. Calhoun also noted that the state auditors will make sure staff adhere to not spending those funds elsewhere. There were also questions about projections for street projects, and Mr. Calhoun said Council and staff will have a more in-depth discussion of this topic at the February 13 winter workshop. Vote by Acclamation: In Favor: Mayor Higgins, Deputy Mayor Haley, and Councilmembers Wood, Peetz, Woodard, and Thompson. Opposed: Councilmember Wick. Motion carried. Council Study Session: 01-30-2018 Page 2 of 6 Approved by Council: DRAFT NON -ACTION ITEMS: 4. Code Text Amendment, 2017-0003, Subdivision Regulations — Marty Palaniuk Planner Palaniuk explained via his PowerPoint, of the proposed Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) amendment to change sections of SVMC chapter 20.20 to clarify the legal lot definition, establish what it means to be an innocent purchaser, eliminate the need for additional width on corner lots, eliminate the lot depth to width restriction, change the definition of a flag lot, eliminate development requirements based on future plans, and to make minor grammatical corrections. Mr. Palaniuk also explained that the current framework for determining a legal lot is confusing, of the need to update SVMC Title 19 to make it consistent with Chapter 20.20, and that future acquisition areas cannot be imposed so this amendment would eliminate requirements associated with future acquisition areas. After brief council discussion concerning these proposed changes, there was consensus from Council to move this forward to a first reading. 5. Barker Grade Separation Project update — Gloria Mantz, Bill Helbig City Engineer Helbig started through the PowerPoint explaining the project location, need and benefit, and the background of the 2004 Bridging the Valley concept leading up to the preliminary designs and alternatives. As shown on slide 6, Ms. Mantz noted the six alternatives and associated cost, and said that all alternatives show a round -about, which is the preferred intersection control for WSDOT, so that has to be our starting point; that through this process an intersection justification report will be prepared to determine if a round -about or a signal will be used for this project; and as shown in the simulation, a round- about has the benefit of keeping traffic moving instead of having it backed up; with signaling and a four - leg intersection, there are thirty-two traffic points that can be used, half of which are for diverging and merging traffic and half for crossing vehicles which is where the most serious and fatal crashes occur. Ms. Mantz said that Alternative 5 is the preferred alternative; she noted the pros and cons of alternative 5, and went over the project funding as shown, and that with the currently budgeted $3.6 million, there is a funding gap of approximately $3 million; and noted that Barker Road will be closed during construction, which is estimated to take between eighteen and twenty-four months. Ms. Mantz explained that she received a telephone call today from Sean Mesner, former City traffic engineer and currently the Spokane County Traffic and Transportation Manager, who told her there are concerns from a couple County Commissioners about alternative 5 not showing a fourth leg that would provide access to the neighborhood on Highland Estates. Ms. Mantz said the City's position from the beginning has been, that we met with Spokane County and with the developer, and we told them that we were open to have a design that provided a fourth leg, but we would be looking for the County or the developer to contribute for that; and she said that as of now, they have not approached us indicating they would be able to or want to participate with funds. Councilmember Woodard asked that if we did a round -about there and nothing has happened with the County or the developer, is it correct that a round -about is built in such a way that a fourth leg could be added in the future with little impact. Ms. Mantz replied that is correct, but it would be ideal to have it designed now. Councilmember Woodard added that the area in question for a fourth leg is outside the jurisdiction of Spokane Valley, but we must make sure our tax dollars are spent for what benefits our citizens, that we don't have an annexation plan for Highland Estates; said he is cognizant of the County Commissioners and the developers, but they need to "step up" pretty soon if they want a fourth leg. Mr. Helbig said there is nothing that would preclude a fourth leg on the round -about in the future, and that would be between the County, the developer, and the state, as the round -about would belong to the state since it would be part of the state highway system. Councilmember Wick then mentioned several concerns; said that it was stated that staff mentioned that in the beginning, we did not have regional support, and he questioned that and said that when he was on Council previously, we had letters of support from the Fire District, the County Commissioners, and the Washington State Secretary of Transportation, all in support of our project going forward. Mr. Helbig said it is his understanding that there was support for a project but it was for the conceptual alternative that was proposed for the full interchange, and that it was the design itself that did not have the full support. Ms. Mantz said it was the interchange design that WSDOT did not support particularly due to the benefit versus the cost as it had a $36 million dollar price tag. Councilmember Wick asked since the County had some Council Study Session: 01-30-2018 Page 3 of 6 Approved by Council: DRAFT concerns, has staff taken this design back to the regional partners like the Fire District and the County to try to get their buy -in for support for alternative 5? Ms. Mantz said staff met with the Fire Department to discuss the alternatives and they relayed to us that anything we would do there would improve the situation; and she further explained that when staff said there was lack of stakeholders support, it was mainly from WSDOT because of the interchange design. Concerning the design simulation shown tonight, Councilmember Wick said it showed an intersection versus a round -about but in previous designs, it wasn't actually an intersection like that, it was a fly -over like Sullivan, and said he hasn't given up on the idea of having a fly -over versus a round -about. Mr. Helbig responded that WSDOT, in their new practical design solution, did not support a fly -over for this location, and their practical design solution is for some type of controlled intersection, either signal controlled or round -about. Councilmember Wick said that when he was in Olympia he had some conversations with some of the Commissioners, and they understood that they would have to extend some dollars for a north leg, and said there might be some communication breakdown, and said they were wanting to have a discussion if we were to move forward, if they have those funds lined up, there might be a benefit from awarding it all at once instead of separately. Ms. Mantz said there will be a coordination meeting that will be set up with us, Spokane County, and SRTC; she said we told Spokane County several times that if they wanted to contribute that we would be open to that, and at one point they indicated that it would have to be developer -driven; and she stressed that conversation was not with the Commissioners but rather at the staff level, and if that is something they would want to entertain, we are not opposed to that idea, and of course, the sooner the better. Mr. Helbig said it is not a huge effort to design for a fourth leg, but is a matter that if a fourth leg is to be constructed, the County staff that he and Ms. Mantz met with said it would be developer -driven whether or not the rest of that development up there actually develops and requires that connection with the state. Councilmember Wick suggested that perhaps the Mayor or our Council extend a letter to the County to let them know that if they want to be in for this fourth leg, we need to move on our project to keep things moving. Mayor Higgins said he would be sitting beside Commissioner French this Thursday and he will ask him. Ms. Mantz added that we have asked our consultant to look at this intersection and determine what additional traffic value would break it in anticipation of having that additional connection from Highland Estates, as currently they have 200 lots there, but that she heard the developer has some big dreams for that neighborhood. Councilmember Wick asked that based on several competing regional factors, do we feel confident in our design abilities to continue moving this project forward. Mr. Helbig said we already have a consultant looking at the conceptual phase for us and we are working with them to estimate the cost of moving forward if we decide to do that. City Manager Calhoun added that discussions are well under way with DEA for phase 2 consultant contract, we have more than a preliminary scope of services under way, and the intention is sometime in February we will be carrying it forward to Council for approval of the entire design and right-of-way services. Councilmember Wood asked if we are talking about holding up this project for the County, and of a possibility of having a fourth leg that has never been discussed, and which is not within our jurisdiction. Mr. Helbig said no, we are not holding this project up waiting for the County, that we have worked long and hard for this and there is no suggestion that this come to a standstill. To clarify, Ms. Mantz said this was not a conversation with the Commissioners, but rather, she had a phone conversation with County Traffic Manager Sean Mesner, and Deputy City Manager Hohman had a telephone conversation with Chad Coles, County Engineer. There was Council consensus to move this project forward. 6. Street Maintenance — John Hohman Deputy City Manager Hohman explained that this is mostly a housekeeping item; that this contract for street and stormwater maintenance was approved in October of 2014, which included four, one-year optional renewals, and that this would be the third of four. Mr. Hohman said that the contract amount hourly rate will change but not the total contract amount as work items will be adjusted accordingly. After Mr. Hohman went over some of the history of these services, including the bidding history, he noted staff seeks consensus from Council to have this item brought back next week for a motion to authorize the City Manager to execute the contract. In response to Councilmember Wick's expressed concern with road maintenance funds, Mr. Hohman explained that our telephone utility tax deficit dramatically affects this contract and Council Study Session: 01-30-2018 Page 4 of 6 Approved by Council: DRAFT that staff will be bringing the issue of road maintenance and street preservation for further discussion, at the February 13 workshop. There was Council consensus to move this item forward for next week's agenda. 7. Street Sweeping — John Hohman As with the previous agenda item, Deputy City Manager Hohman gave Council some background on this contract, which was approved in 2015 to include four optional, one-year renewals; he said this would be the third option; and that the contract amount would stay the same as in previous years. Council agreed to move this forward at an upcoming meeting for a motion consideration to consider this renewal. 8. Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins Mayor Higgins said there appears to be some confusion among citizens about single family dwelling and duplexes; and he would like staff to give Council a report on what our Code contains concerning the definition of single family dwelling. There were no objections from Council. 9. Information Only The (a) Quarterly Report Permit Center Survey; and the (b) Department Reports were for information only and were not reported or discussed. 10. Council Check-in — Mayor Higgins Councilmember Thompson mentioned that she met with City Manager Calhoun, his assistant Ms. Elisha Heath, and Parks & Recreation Administrative Assistant Ms. Tina Gregerson, to discuss youth engagement projects; said they had some great ideas and that she will be reporting more on this topic in the future. 11. City Manager Comments — Mark Calhoun Per his handout distributed to Council just prior to the meeting, City Manager Calhoun explained that there are two legislative issues he would like to bring to Council's attention. Mr. Calhoun stated that House Bill 2952 sponsored by Representative Shea seeks to rename the Appleway Trail to the Senator Bob McCaslin Trail; that this matter is set for a public hearing and executive action February 1, and our lobbyist has asked us to let her know the City's direction on this bill. Councilmember Thompson said she knew Senator McCaslin for a long time, and had worked with him and greatly respected him; and said she has a concern however with the State legislature renaming something in our City, which is not state land or a state project; said she is not sure she would support renaming the trail, but offered the idea of perhaps having a plaque dedicated in honor of Senator McCaslin; and said she would not be in support of this bill to have the legislature change a name on a project that we have worked on which is in our community. Councilmember Wick said he was not in attendance last week in Olympia for the Association of Washington Cities action days, and he asked if our representative brought this up at that time. Mayor Higgins replied that it was briefly discussed then. Councilmember Wick and Thompson mentioned this is catching them unaware. Councilmember Wick said he would have preferred that this had come to Council first. Mayor Higgins explained that it was an idea, and not necessarily anything that was formalized. There was brief discussion about Council previously sending a letter of support in the renaming of a section of State Highway 27 in memory of Sam Strahan who had been killed in a shooting incident at Freeman High School, which is a state highway. Councilmember Woodard said that perhaps this gives our citizens more protection with a trail named after a senator who served for more than thirty years, and give some protection to that lineal trail; that thirty years after the trail has been completed and "they" want to put in rapid transit, this would give us protection and give us local control; said he is open to the idea, that in Olympia it was just an idea and not something in a bill; and said that perhaps the state does have some say in this based on the amount of state grant money we have received for this trail. Discussion moved to the cost of the marker as well as changing signage around the City. Mr. Calhoun said we have just become aware of this this afternoon, so have not had an opportunity to do an inventory of those signs. Councilmember Wood said that he agrees with Councilmember Thompson and questioned the state's right to tell us what we can name that trail and that he would like to know if they do have that right as he objects to the state telling us what we have to name something in our city; he said Senator McCaslin did a wonderful Council Study Session: 01-30-2018 Page 5 of 6 Approved by Council: DRAFT job for this community for over thirty years, and that he has a lot of respect for Senator McCaslin; and Councilmember Wood also mentioned the financial impact on our signs. City Attorney Driskell said we are in a difficult position from a timing standpoint since a public hearing on this will be held on this very soon, and suggested it might be a good idea for Council to consider delaying this action so we can determine the costs and impacts of such a change, and what is the authority if any, of the legislature to tell the city what the name of a park has to be; and in that regard, said he and Mr. Calhoun have discussed the idea of the City adopting a process to use in naming a park, street, etc., and what considerations Council might want to include in defining such criteria. Councilmember Wood said he is in favor of delaying this bill. There was apparent consensus with that idea and Mayor Higgins asked if we could ask our lobbyist to see if we can delay this bill. Mr. Calhoun stated staff will draft a letter on behalf of the City and signed by Mayor Higgins, asking for deferment for legislative action until the 2019 legislative session. Councilmember Thompson suggested that the Council's great respect for Senator McCaslin and our gratitude for his work be included in that letter. Mr. Driskell said he will draft a letter that addresses the cost to the city, and the authority of the legislature to require a name change, and that the letter will specifically identify the respect Council and the community has for Senator McCaslin. Councilmember Wick suggested it might be better received as a capital budget item, to add the plaque and that we would gladly accept that and place that on the Appleway Trail in honor of Senator McCaslin. City Attorney Driskell said that Washington Cities Insurance Authority (WCIA) brought to our attention, two bills, House Bill 2262 and Senate Bill 6015 regarding changing the wrongful death statutes to expand the definitions of the people who could sue for wrongful death, and to apply those definitions retroactively if within the statute of limitations; he said it would likely cost the state an additional $3.5 million annually and would encourage more wrongful death suits; said even if we contributed a very small percentage to a death, we could be liable for the entire amount, which would also impact the risk pool costs. There was Council concurrence that Mr. Driskell draft a letter under the Mayor's signature, asking that our lobbyist sign in in opposition to both bills. City Manager Calhoun also noted that the Council/Staff workshop will be held in this room February 13, beginning at 8:30 a.m., and will hopefully end by 2:30 p.m., he noted the February 13 evening council meeting will not be held. It was moved by Deputy Mayor Haley, seconded and unanimously agreed to adjourn. The meeting adjourned at 7:49 p.m. ATTEST: L.R. Higgins, Mayor Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Council Study Session: 01-30-2018 Page 6 of 6 Approved by Council: DRAFT Attendance: Councilmembers MINUTES SPOKANE VALLEY COUNCIL MEETING STUDY SESSION Spokane Valley City Hall Council Chambers Spokane Valley, Washington February 6, 2018 Staff Rod Higgins, Mayor Pam Haley, Deputy Mayor Brandi Peetz, Councilmember Linda Thompson, Councilmember Ben Wick, Councilmember Sam Wood, Councilmember Arne Woodard, Councilmember Mark Calhoun City Manager Cary Driskell, City Attorney Erik Lamb, Deputy City Attorney Chelsie Taylor, Finance Director Mike Stone, Parks & Rec Director Bill Helbing, City Engineer Gloria Mantz, Engineering Manager Morgan Koudelka, Sr. Admin. Analyst Marty Palaniuk, Planner Henry Allen, Senior Engineer Mark Werner, Police Chief Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Mayor Higgins called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. ROLL CALL: City Clerk Bainbridge called the roll, all Councilmembers were present. ACTION ITEMS: 1. First Reading Ordinance 18-003, Amending Street Standards — Henry Allen After City Clerk Bainbridge read the ordinance title, it was moved by Deputy Mayor Haley and seconded to advance Ordinance 18-003, amending Street Standards, to a second reading. Via his PowerPoint, Engineer Allen went over the proposed update to the street standards. It was noted Chapter 5 was not included and Mr. Allen said that is because there are no proposed changes in that chapter. There was also brief discussion about the logistics of performing a traffic impact analysis. Mayor Higgins invited public comment; no comments were offered. Vote by Acclamation: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed: None. Motion carried. 2. First Reading Ordinance 18-004, Updating Subdivision Regulations — Marty Palaniuk After City Clerk Bainbridge read the ordinance title, it was moved by Deputy Mayor Haley and seconded to advance Ordinance 18-004 updating subdivision regulations, to a second reading. After Planner Palaniuk went over the background of the proposed amendments, Mayor Higgins invited public comment. No comments were offered. Vote by Acclamation: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed: None. Motion carried. 3. Motion Consideration: Street Maintenance Option to Renew — Bill Helbig It was moved by Deputy Mayor Haley and seconded to authorize the City Manager to finalize and execute the 2018 option year contract renewal with Poe Asphalt Paving in the amount of $1,366,663. After City Engineer Helbig briefly explained the background of this renewal option, Mayor Higgins invited public comment. No comments were offered. Vote by Acclamation: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed: None. Motion carried. Council Study Session: 02-06-2018 Page 1 of 3 Approved by Council: DRAFT 4. Motion Consideration: Street Sweeping Option to Renew - Bill Helbig It was moved by Deputy Mayor Haley and seconded to authorize the City Manager to finalize and execute the 2018 option year contract renewal with AAA Sweeping in the amount of $490,200.00. After City Engineer Helbig briefly explained the background of this renewal option, Mayor Higgins invited public comment. No comments were offered. Vote by Acclamation: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed: None. Motion carried. NON -ACTION ITEMS: 5. Spokane Housing Authority (SHA) Re -authorization — Erik Lamb; SHA Director Pam Tietz Deputy City Attorney Lamb introduced SHA Executive Director Pam Tietz, who he explained, brought this re -authorization to our attention. As noted in his February 6, 2018 Request for Council Action form, Mr. Lamb explained that the Authority recently determined that several requirements contained in the original authorizing documents, including our Resolution 03-047, were burdensome and inflexible thereby making it difficult for the Authority to conduct its business in the most efficient manner; he said that we as well as the City of Spokane and Spokane County were approached by the Authority to work on documents that would allow more operational flexibility with things such as meeting times and specific personnel. After hearing from Ms. Tietz about several changes made in the SHA to improve flexibility and customer service, and of their efforts to continue working with other area partners, there were no objections from Councilmembers to move this forward for an ordinance first reading. 6. Pre -Law Enforcement Academy Training — Mark Werner, Morgan Koudelka, and Tony Anderson Senior Administrative Analyst Koudelka explained that our police department is in the midst of a wave of retirements, and the department is struggling to fill those vacancies; he said the department is meeting those challenges and finding some successes, but having a pre -law enforcement academy will be another tool to help fill vacancies more quickly. Chief Werner said from the point of hire in the last four years, there has been a loss ratio of 32.1% and he wants to address how to mitigate that, and this is a way to obtain more successes; he said sometimes after an eighteen -week academy and the new hire gets in the training car, they realize the job is not what they thought it would be; he also mentioned there are limited academy spots throughout the state, and sometimes the wait to get into the academy can be three or four months; all of which creates more cost as more people work overtime waiting for new hires. Chief Werner introduced Mr. Anderson, who is an instructional systems designer, and who has been with the Sheriff's Office for several years, and who prior to that had been involved in a criminal justice training center for many years. After Mr. Anderson went through the PowerPoint explaining about the current training process for the basic deputy, future training solutions, training enhancements, resources needed to meet the vision, desired outcomes and strategic assistance; Chief Werner said this pre -academy would start with four officer candidates and would be more of a pilot program. Mr. Koudelka also went over the cost impact and service legal impact estimate, which was included as part of the council packet material. Council voiced no objections to the academy. 7. Spokane Valley Police Department Vehicle Color and Graphics — Mark Werner, Morgan Koudelka After Mr. Koudelka went through his PowerPoint explaining and showing examples of the options for police department vehicle color and graphics, there appeared to be Council consensus to go with option 1A, the two-tone partial wrap, and to make the words "Spokane Valley" a little larger, and "Police" a little smaller. Mr. Koudelka said he will work with the City Manager to refine the graphics as noted, and to move this forward. 8. Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins Deputy Mayor Haley said that there has been an idea raised about the senate taking remote testimony at some of the community colleges, and they would like to try that on a smaller sale, and she suggested perhaps using our Council chamber. Mr. Calhoun said he will have to determine who at the state to talk to regarding Council Study Session: 02-06-2018 Page 2 of 3 Approved by Council: DRAFT IT issues and to get their IT department and our IT department talking to determine what could be accommodated, and said we would have to figure out their schedule and make sure there are no conflicts in this room. Mr. Calhoun said staff will follow up on those issues and report back to Council. Council concurred. Councilmember Thompson said she has more information to share on launching of the Youth Voice Event and would like to include that on a future agenda. There were no objections from Council. 9. Council Check-in — Mayor Higgins There were no additional Council comments. 10. City Manager Comments — Mark Calhoun City Manager Calhoun reminded everyone that there will be no evening Council meeting next week as the winter workshop will be held in this room beginning at 8:30 a.m., and hopes to conclude by 2:30 p.m. Councilmember Woodard said he is up for jury duty so won't know until Friday night if he will be able to attend. Mr. Calhoun said if someone can't make it, he is willing to do a one-on-one if that person desires. City Attorney Driskell briefed Council on several pending bills: (1) SB 6408 concerning body worn cameras and having those records exempt under the Public Record Act as exposure to those records could be offensive to some, and there is a need to protect people as well as their residences, including the identify of domestic violence a victims; and he asked if Council wanted to support this bill or not take a position. There was consensus from about five Councilmembers to support the bill. (2) SB 5598, grandparents rights for visitation; he mentioned the 4th district opposes this and after briefly explaining the bill, asked if Council wanted to support, oppose, or not take a position. There was Council consensus from about four Councilmembers to oppose the legislation. (3) SB 2952 the Appleway Trail as amended, which rather than the legislature renaming the Trail, the bill directs the City to rename it. Mr. Driskell also noted the legislature would pay for the signage; that this bill passed out of original committee but nothing is scheduled at this time. Councilmember Wood voiced his opposition to the City being directed to change the name. Mayor Higgins suggested not doing anything but to wait to see if this gets out of committee, and Mr. Calhoun noted this information tonight was intended as an update. Councilmember Wick said he would like to go on record as being opposed to the change. Councilmember Woodard said the word "opposed" is stronger than he wants, but that rather he would like an opportunity to discuss this and have public comment from our citizens, and that postponement was a reasonable request, and also mentioned he feels there is no need to do anything further until we know where or if the bill is moving. Mr. Driskell said he will continue to update Council as he receives more information. It was moved by Deputy Mayor Haley, seconded and unanimously agreed to adjourn. The meeting adjourned at 7:58 p.m. ATTEST: L.R. Higgins, Mayor Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Council Study Session: 02-06-2018 Page 3 of 3 Approved by Council: Meeting Date: CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action February 27, 2018 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ['consent ❑ old business ® new business ['public hearing ['information ❑admin. report ['pending legislation ['executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Second reading of Ordinance 18-003 (CTA -2017-0004) - revisions to the Street Standards and related amendments to the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) GOVERNING LEGISLATION: Chapter 35.78 RCW PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: • March 2003 - Ordinance 53 adopting Spokane County Road Standards • December 2009 - Ordinance 09-033 adopting City's Street Standards • December 2016 - Ordinance 16-018 revising Surety Requirements in Chapter 9 • December 5, 2017 — Administrative Report, Street Standards Update • February 6, 2018 — 1St Reading BACKGROUND: Chapter 35.78 RCW requires cities and counties to adopt uniform definitions and design standards for municipal streets and roads. The City adopted the City of Spokane Valley Street Standards in December 2009. The following revisions have been incorporated since adoption: • Updated Standard Plans in January 2016 • Updated requirements for sureties in December 2016 During the December 5, 2017 Council meeting, Council heard a report explaining the basics of the Street Standards, including what is required, our last updates, and that the purpose of the proposed revision is mostly due to the FHWA's request to update the Maintenance Responsibility Section to ensure infrastructure funded with federal funds is adequately cared for, as well as to address changes to implementation of the Standards, and to the City's organizational structure which was changed in early 2017. At that December 5, 2017 meeting, Council agreed to move this forward. At their December 14, 2017 meeting, the Planning Commission heard a report on the proposed amendments to the Street Standards, and subsequently held a public hearing on the matter January 11, 2018. During the Commission's January 25, 2018 meeting, they passed a motion to recommend that Council adopt the draft with certain modifications as noted below, and moved to approve the Findings and Recommendations and to forward those to Council. The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) has requested updates to the Maintenance chapter (Chapter 10) of the Street Standards to ensure that infrastructure funded with federal funds is adequately cared for. While FHWA comments were being addressed, revisions to the SVMC and other Street Standard chapters were also proposed to address changes to implementation of the Standards and to the City's organizational structure established in early 2017. This ordinance is a City initiated text amendment to: • Amend Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) to modify SVMC 20.80 and 22.130 to remove references to Future Acquisition Areas, • Update Chapter 3 (Traffic Analysis) to provide guidance on traffic requirements for SEPA infill areas, • Update Chapter 10 (Maintenance) to address FHWA comments on the maintenance of sidewalks, and, • Perform changes to most chapters in the Street Standards to reflect reorganization and revisions to implementation. And also to incorporate the Planning Commission's recommended revisions to the Municipal Code and Street Standards: • Modify SVMC 22.130 to replace references to "development services senior engineer" with "City Manager or designee." • Modify Section 1.3.2 bullet 3 to read as follows: To ensure public facilities and services meet level of service standards as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. • Modify Section 10.2.1 paragraph two sentence two to read as follows: Property owners are responsible for the maintenance of these features as described below. OPTIONS: Approve Ordinance with or without modifications RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to approve Ordinance 18-003, Amending Street Standards. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: N/A STAFF CONTACT: Henry Allen, Senior Engineer Ray Wright, Senior Engineer, Traffic Gloria Mantz, Engineering Manager ATTACHMENTS: 1. Ordinance text which includes: Attachment A Draft SVMC chapters 20.80 Attachment B 22.130 with Planning Commission changes Attachment C Draft revised Street Standard chapters with Planning Commission changes 2. Planning Commission Findings and Recommendations 3. Staff Report and Recommendation CFFV" 01; S'I'Oh.AN1': :ti.:E1:11 SI'i114 \\'.A.S.HINC TONT ORI)tNANCI': NO, 1S;. -1.1t13 .A ?I 1.11' :1: (:I (11' 1111°: CITY OF SI-`1.0K.A.N1-.. .E ti. SPOKANE' COUNTY, W !TLl.iN( I(.r\ : N1I'.\DJN(": Tilt STREET 'T:i.'\DAJ D'.; AMENDING SPOKANE 2.'11.1 E':► 11'NIr:IF':\i. i OI)!'.: .`1/41 '.,1) CHAPTER 2!.134 SPOKANE VALLEY 'J9".i'41(_l.P.• L CODE" BELATED TO FUTURE ACQUISITION AREAS, AND OTHER II,(; 1.I IF-:ltF.1 3. 'k i IL.]\ '.AS, L' 'snarl C't}I:lc (SVMC) 22.1.;11.04U, II:t' City of j��r:'liiiTae vulle Ey) IJIrvioLJ314' t.dcpLsri its C:1{:r. Valley Street SC_,.n az.d_, (Street S?&.ndn1'cI ), L511ti1 Ila li'laldC 4l!il..t_'L711i;ii_.'fl'vlld"il;_'111=: II':.:}I" 111r'.t_' I{} and 4A`1 -11:.l' '.\ pi'o inions r'elatirig' to ftit_ire acquisition areas.. z:Ivriirts:`'; `inti =LLI? CC1llUlit c'`rnenc'iri erlts from =11111 t{i tIlr':U tip 11pp1-LI. rialc'; KIRI iite tiLl1horiz,eci l_, l f.;s,, 36.70/4 and WIDE] EF1S. ,on December 11, 2017, the Washington State Department ofCommerce was notified .106, providing.a 60 -day notice olinLu'lrtto iuiopt arritmthrxmLs 1C1 Sp ttn V Cey i1eti elopllerli.:egLl..li]ons; and WIMP, AS, on December 14, 2017, the Planning Commission .11..-2k:. and wrTPRr.A' , on December 15, 2(17 and December 22, ' 1 ns}li'_c':}; °: ,, `;- : ,'liirig C'oT'ninis irrn 1',1;,lic Ir.:,:i.;.. ].i111.651�{'iifn1hi 1i,ll!, 1 wsHe11+;and oil January 11, 2018, the Planning COM is_:c1n field ri pub' e' IIe_,rin2,, received 1'i!t-IIti testrr1)oI1v., and {I staff report'.'.'JLfl r 1.c:co Tl°flt:'I'I:b1tioI'i 11`11':1',',;_ I):„' and "Vi.LRE:'.S. '"'.; J_ill'w'. 25, 2018, the Planning Commission approved the findings and reeornmel1ded Llliil l ILS (.illteIci .1io;}i r1i2 Ifff4v'FI;1P[1L'T11 ; i9T1{1 WHEEJ A , on F'ebru ry 6, 2018, City Coinii4:i1 considered i first ordinance reading 10 adopt the proposed amendment; and WITS€ EAS, the amendment set forth helk-Nl ' is consist�.]]i 4vi111 the g.oak and policies sIf 13]w :ity'. Cornprehensive Plan; an+T WHEREAS, the Street Standards al]1d chapters 20.80 and 22.130 SVMC, as amended, bear a sulk 1arltigl relation to ifr4: puhiac hlcahth, s.arcly, wel fart :91111 frrarlxl.lor t.pl' ltae envlmrlmLm. ori 114' '1'HI •l- : _ Ti 1 Il:` l' i'? ( on.i{'i1 or the City o Spak inc VriU 'y '. r{Tains as follows; I. J71II I>t:, ., 1 114 purpose. o1"111is Ordinance is to znake minor revisions to the Street iCUICEt1 :i[ 7Il(I related a1]r:.nJI :eic11a1:r.Lr 20.1.10 SVv't(. k).1...nila.ry1.111~ :° !=111 :ffl iity:rl .1i1:,iI1:111.5 1. ;p}{; chapter ':.,1 }. tie' >'JC 1 .5. 1 }larrt4.rll h'ransporlation hlilpi'o''ements. `st'dis'u 1111:1 Conclusions. L1SIons. 'Ilhe Circ. ',vr ','r.e l] acicncjwleclges FJ-Iat the Planning ( :..', iIj--'l'" ",:1i;1��!'ii:c1 :l"':°..lti'}II:IIi I;",r":I�'�YII{}T7 ,..q; ';Lil{Iy" II�141 uu. 17i.1I7liC:. hcuti tg on LhL proposed 1)11.22 1 rif 3 DRAFT amendments and recommends approval of the amendments. The City Council has read and considered the Planning Commission's findings. The City Council hcrcby makes the following findings: A. Grovvhh Management Act Policies - Washington State Growth Management Act ((,MA) provi,1;::s his. iUF city shall adopt a comprehensive land use plan and cicvciop ent regulations that are consistent with and implement the comprehensive plan. H. City ofSpokan.e Valley Gotils and Polices - The City of Spo ane Valley has adopted goals and ])s}iL L. cf n Lci1I vil.1 Li,c (MA and adopted County -Wide Planning PoliL€Cs, set I.a ,ci iJsc Policy — 8: Ensure that neighborhoods fire served by safe and convenient motorized and nem-moLorir,ed transportation routes. 'E'rarisportation Policy - 9: Provide and >.naintain quality street, sidewalk, and shared -use path suriitces that provide a safe environment for all users. Capital. Facilities Policy -3: Coordinate the consiruedion or public infrastructure vith private development to minims costs. C. Conclusions 'PK: proposed amendment bears a substantial relation to public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment. The proposed City -initiated Code text amendments are consistent with the City's adopted. Comprehensive Plan and the apprroval criteria pursuant to SVMC 17.80.150(F). The GIA stipulates (hal 1111.7 LOT!1 rc;hetr ivc [and use plat) and developmerl` lll;:lionti shall he subject to of:itl])t1LL1g review auld i.valu;ilii?Tl 71 Lha. t,li',' I he tir(,pr sa] is consistent with RCN ' 3r ,7r1./\ WLtahington. State GMA, which sti]?L1[f1LCS IhaaL the L't1mr rchcnsi' C ).and -05e pian and development regulations he ub.ject to continuing review .kind cv'Pa111;i4iC)tr by the City. Section 3. Amendment. Chapter- 20.80 SVM(.' is hereby amended as set forth in Attachment Sections, 4. :11 r,:i,l ,;T ! !'1i ii..;: =_ '.iX1 4:VVr cl "AM end as set forth inAlt chnicrll ,6L . ;3C'Ction 5, . , ,il`IId:;lc; 1. 11: is l:_ .1- C;' St;ticple'r::l?y emended as set forth Aliacli IL:rll .Seclliln section:- or 1(1 o„,_. v�._ �y•••r,']�.�..='..,.. the. 5po]s:a`_e \ iiI]Cr SI.r21::1 ititi911dirds Ili?t. sped 1y i'cicrenced hereto SLiti':. 1e+I ••:I i:: c I .,,:i ill fylrtie and cI'I.t:L:i. Smtion 7. even.:.?iliiv. If ani section, sentence, e:1:!Ll:.r .:}i 1•}: !n_Icl i be invalid or u,}c:,_astitutacsy:,. 'I .a' - I ;if :oiii'_I !ill.11.it}11i!ul., ,Fall my. affect the va.tidilvr ib: tonsil iiori.L'.IIIx i?i'zl''_ '11..1.:JNL' i',1 thlq O-ordrnalnce. Ordinance 1g-003 Stmt Standards 1)RAFT Section 8., Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect five clays after publication of this OrdiEtr non or a summary thereof in the official newspaper of the City of Spokan : Val Icy its provided by law Passed by the City Council this day of , 2018. ATTEST: L.R, Hi ins, Mayor Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Approved as to Form: Office of the City Attorney I.)ate r)rPublication: Effective Date: Ordsnan t. 18-003 S i eget Stara iardg Page 3 of 3 4�"'ti�Wrlr;' k' ilII: >r1111'�l;:;t7r1I 'od1 21;..11 1.1{]I.,`,I-4,'4I 'r LINE L1J... 1 's11..\lT if'I .FT,11N tTiONS .c•Ivl i 'Irlj: 8111.0 1 0 Scone. 20.80,020 _Xi 8(1,[,21) ATTACH N1 ENT A f Ii:sl71er• 20,81? BOUNDARY LINE ADJ 1JSTMENTS?1w;1,IA'iaNATI ONS rlras;';it . rcquirclllcr,s.. .t.vcon.l.tttLur:, 2l1"4IJ.1illn Scope. Boundary 'in.:: :IJiLI ".L_'„ r;:k srlall P.P... rrri'7Co tll l.`.a ' rfRc:_ 7t area ti: n-eo. rlin n"u;l! rlir:L F.; ! i 7tcrior lot Iint of a "'.tII(:L't IIID sljl. mer,[; r..to5t ; c c.i5.7 i tcni s', id iii Pave 1/2 :.era inn in tIii location nib' Ln' pared bvl.!-11.i :ricx t1i isti-11_. lots or r:otinaS_ or.tl[!rl Ilts`c-., jro.1 he of .1 :'Ir ,-'11,< 1 ; .- pill prock:SS IS 0 ','. .I i,1 • .74��I 1J 1' 1r1411'f . e.l?pl'ate lots vvit11 contiguous {A'.4: R4'.f:iJl! . Boundary A. such alteration shall not increase tho number of tarts nor diminish in size .pen .r other p1'4tteued cnvir0rmierits; B. Sub 1111 ]' 60.11 stiaiI RN diminish the 5i7C of any lot bra as to resuli iti at 101 of less square footage than pre -scribed in the zoning r4:gir}ations: C. Such Lrll4t.ali,vrl shall n011'e ult In a building setback violation or site Coverage 10 Cess than prescribed by the ;�_{i:ir:Jrw 1-IIt1,icn: cru-i::;,rs required in tiv\t ae -p:;to7- it;atr[d D.:'.i I It1t;, rc111si ng 1:rur:S the 1,r: urldary line alteration shall he in c7nforinanoe with the design standards ofthis chari:"2r. • 0!•d I2 -'70S §;. }.�2 J 2. 0-d. 09-002 § 6,:2009, 0r>4.1)7.01 s§ 4. 2(107). 211,811.111211 itevie.w procass: 13ti't,il'L :'",'j lint; : ti ustilicrIU zlnd ...•Ji.n'.I!tll.;i,i1;5 are classified as'I'ype 1 applications and hall be r vieti+ved p . •scant to chaffer 1 7.'?;1 .Ai:. • C):d. i1' -ll('` ; (. 'fif; cl i 'y:l. 07-9 .. C 4. 2''7 1. 20,80.+}3[1 tllJ.li€.r:tirrlr Anel drawing requirements, %kp].ilearlflr, If7r _'. 170..1111JLll'_y iir]ti: 'tI:II1...1711:)11 Citi".Ii1.01r.c'.'',rr. .ha!I nl:;:lc nr :;.:0-171S Provia}oi;l by tho department and shall r:.I k'+w;de A, I :. ikl i ri;• 1 ^ l.i lti;7!7.: Sit: Plan: Puo lo- , tarsoide Site Plan or 45 eight -and -one -half-inch by 1 I -inch sheet Wittt tans: -i rt l; !_lard i! z ur. , II ;i;le siloins. the following information: 1. Tau hvxis'.i!I :J l; yl;ryi^11 nr1..1 square footage of the existingpropor1ylies) t'i1Volve4; 2. The locaLien and se. ab`.Its of any permanent improvements (i.+.:., s}niolti.`es, septic systems, etc") from all properly lines; 3" The identification, huoalion txrkl Iimensiorl or ail acce,CS and utility casemunis; and 4. 'file diraLlision i an:! riirn co. pubh1. dtidlnr-pl'ivate streets abutting the property{ics}; and 5" North arrow and :..c:3Ic shall lx; njki1• 13. Proposed Adjustment E i:iii!lr,l:u17 5ii4' I'Itlr;, if''1:Rloc;t a to -scale I.'i:7 o17 au l 1-LYLi:}] Sheet Irvin~ one -inch rllargir:: or. .1: id..: vl.t•'.,in Lth." :I'I,,lr 1. the location and setbacks Jfllny pernik-L:1e!II i!I,1:1{1':' 11'�Illr Ii e.. srr1.l�L�rti i. :1-.,i:. Y ;I.til:l:,, It:1 iE.tcr lhu pl'Lylir.�_:SI Oi.,III'ilary 1 ilio '_c1j114tn:^_liL or ciimirAttif}Il 1i•ein r:h.' p.n.. Die tipoi:a,hteVaI.1 yctlrrcml Ihn:ll 11)1.11.7Hr cCNovember 11.2.011, STiokisriv Va[Icy Chapter L-OLINi.:1A'Vir 1 INF.. ATTACHMENT A \;iNIATI(..5NS 2. ldeni:fleation, loev.ion and diuteiisicai or milly easements niter NET,. r..liirinFAiricr.. Pg 2,..2 3. The !D.A, ti ll• si ors and rr,...11 ;iimit e. pr,:peity(its.) aller the propos.,..J o in:A.07y 11,.1.jiibiir.v.nr or e i; ination; 4. Indic:0.1...o 1ines to he rev link. !lit proposed fz, solid [ii Id]3Ii.Ck.. 5, North arrcN and ,;ale sladi be rikited. C. On a separate 17 CCI. of -paper onk-lrill% b f 1 in ehes) a written legal deseriptiOn tr [he eisthig p-areel(s) Itikt proposed n.:111.-‘bc..1 eliminaked loar:L:ins. or. 21 D. Or mpy ch of all involved properly ownrOcorded deed.5, verifying ciuren1 ownu-ship Q.th ubject propu-Lyticsl. E. TivdIbIe. submit a copy of ars original pini Ir Lhe subj.eck propetly. A copy of the general lurid Officep1iLi riot red. . record '' o-ri!..1,?.properry may ha required by the city roamer or designee., 'live need for a .survey will lac ni 1 Ii mniher of parcels, legal delicripiieri% appurtenances, disputed or apparent lines of.....v...ners:-(1.7., kind N.A.Lidci.,,„ 1-. the survey rnul he completed by proissional land surveyor licensed the Vv. I] to L. Ord, I §.3. 20 17; Old. 1 2 -!OI 1, 2012-, Ord 09-002 § 21)09; Ord, 07-015 § 20. 11.044.1 Rite.0 rrla 1 d .rarnii 11 icco1-2. Hppro d E141 Oary lFi aorlinstmen Ts and elim in nil ons i,vith the Spokane Comity o Itlee and dIerT. t r.1.4.1 ol.1Ly zri.bes6or's ',ace. All fec ffir shall he pal..J.1-w the appli G1111. pf.10:: 1 i.diri. f. 1:14-111:12 S(L. (.)1.6 0 71115 2007), The Spokane Valley !vItmicipa I Codt carrretitiliroup,111 Ordinance Na- 17-011, panol Nov=1E-pm 14. ZT117. L V ELOP•NIENTIRANSPORTATION ATTACH ME NT B C.:11upter 22.130 DEVELOPMENT TR kNSPOrtirA.1.10N IMPROVEMENTS 2;?....13(1.)21-1 Lind slundti.RL 22.13(1.0.10 :titrect. sTandarL..... Manual frail -1c C......710.01 22.13(1.06E) 11).e......e1.,‘..;..ireit projcct and r 22,130.070 improvements. oreos; 22.130.090 Conditional lite permit. 22. 130.100 Hight-or-wr-y permit arid use rc k 22..130. L 10 Liability. 22.1 3111..0111 Purpose. I he purpose of this chapter ia Lor. Pagc 116 A. ;....1.7..intair 11.119.11.i.ou orsIrc,01. iatrustructtire: B. Mijth.irj urd ; lil Thtl'en safety:. C. Provide for figure street expansion; D. Filar may 1..1: iinpoi:cd upon devi.'1upnic.:n in 22130.020. (Ord. 09-033 * 3, 2009; 011,1, (17-015 § 4, 2007), 22,130,020 Regulated at tivities. All new development apo ru Y al.:. grid permits as set in Chapter IMO SVMC, unless extrript punuant in 8:110MC 17.g0.040, shall comply iih 1.0 i.:itapier. (Ord, 09-03:3 § 3, 2009; Ord. 07-015 § 4, 20071. 2.2,13.0,030 Authority t4 develop and adulluLter sia iida .111E develt-tpiric.ra [or engineer, tirlidef this -authority of -the city mdnagur or ticigoce, stroll develop and administer the Spokane Ve,Iley sireei staridards (SVMC 22.130.040) and TUC uire dlevelop11eti1 projects to provide transportation irnpruvernents, dedicate right-orway and border easements. Lnd 'PhOSE!' improvementswiU bc requiredlo achieve the. purpo5e of this chapter and goals of the cuffently thlupled Comprehensive Plan. (Orel. 17.004 § 3, 201.7i Ord. 09-03 2009). 22.f 30.040 .Struitl .11 to 1.1( and :2. 1.1.1 pi:73. F riiic.. The City street stantlards,lind aa it may foe. to 7; I 11,:' C.L.Tk 7:11LLII1iiiij i 16-01 f.1§ '7 (Alt. B.), 2016; Ord. 09-03.3 § 3„ 14 Iwo rid. iVel..ices, i 1r3V h eMiCed Eci (rale, is rier.2by 07-6[5 •1. 22.1304160 1}evel.opentol a5,11 rIcrrE131 in'oress. 1... [7,80 VN1C, 1h project Oa be reviewed to inuterial Fandfoc analysis may be vecF.ii-.:A L3.:iriors'.1.01,. (Ord. LheSpokaoz. Valley Murniceipol CiAki irrIarr4.1.60 Otdirtance N. 17-014, passed Novcmlyor 14, 2,017, Spokane Valley Municipal Code Chapter 22,130 DEVELOPMENT TRA.N/SPOW A'1 LON 1MPROVEM N1S ATTACH M E IST B Page 216 22.1130 070 Required improvements. A. Prior to the issuance of any approvals for dcvclopment pi- jecls or permits subject to the provisions of this chapter, the development serr lees senior eng„ineerC'ikw 'wlunauer or designee shal l determine the extent and type of street improvements laid-right-of-wayfbordercasements deilic.rationy or-de;;i rtatie+>• of fa•rttrt required, to the extent allowed by the law, and pi rsuamt to the following; 1. The Comprehensive flan; 7. The arterial street max 3. The sin.tt standard: (SVN{C 2.2,130.040); 4_ The Manual on Uniform Trade Control Devices identified in 13VMC 22.130.050; 5, 'Ile local street plan; fi. Information submit -.cel by the applicant including oily pi'eliiiliricary site plans, engineering reports, or other relevant data; 7. A ifete ttinaffa3] of the fineti irl_ safety, e_ iete y and cuordLL]k'.1e6 "`i,(ere i.pansiori needs of the roadway system lir serve he travelinC. pubI c and emergency .rehieles; and B. Portions ofihr i,ni t rix development code_ ti VMC Titles 17 through 25, that specifically identify required Future roadways, streets, or other 11 n- 1s-nf way B. Requirements may includes b!ii i'1:11 1 iris OM to' I. The cxicnt and type of retioiDAI sireeL impruwerrieriis pursuant t- .SVfu1C 22.130,0€0; 2_ The extent of a iditi.,nak] arltl:. u new righl-ol.-way and/or border easement needed to support the required ir»provem ent,; p,irxu_mL L SI./ MC 22.130.04L0: 3- c, --_:g ^•?^ ftrt i,;unit to SY:I+fC 22.130.! 0: 4 .. Participation in capital improvement projects as included on the adopted six-year street improvement plan. (Ord. 09-033 § :l, 200); Ord. OS -006 § 1, 2008; Ord. 07-015 ? 4, 2007. Formerly 22.130,030). 22. A. When a Enure :tccialsitierrt Lrerxr dLaignntcd, a'itic notice shrill be-:;ompleted and recorded witti-the- u!rlty- tiuLlitor. The notice :tial I r rn- 4th dire Jaald and-shalknot be removed or tuner tied prior to approval,'I-he noriee Miall be recorded las soon its possible and, itx all cares, prior-re-theisnuanee of a building permit. The notih; i1; 11;4 2,1 4tilae-reizr ncc to r,ny related uppros-al five number or perrnit'}umbers; 3. ltrcluderar} !-Mbit Showing 3trctit names, future acquisition taro s, rig11Ls of yti'a . e . ; 1. Identify any lirairations prix --it 5. Indicate that he-dtrure-aequ Identify -the r-espolwihility-for r; locution or lor;s of interim leatures or i!tt} ro't amar+ts-within the-fut rte- fi girisitioi areas; and id$ry(ies 7. Be mailed to the pro11•etly r wryer' ora: _ -,. _ _ _ . • 4. ount)/ a:r e;.a::tu's/trt'.tl:;uri r`s records. it'a complete mailing.his-irradicaute!_ Die Spokane Vi'llcyMunicipal rode is current through Ordinance No. 17-011, passed November lel, 3017. Spokane Valley Municipal Code Chapter 22.130 DEVELOPMENT TRANSPORTATION IMP ROV t?MENTS ATTACHMENT T B Page 3/6 The establis11iH g ne -aistevial street plan, the local sired map or other-etr . .. esessary-14LLthe-['1t} initiates the amendment or removal of title notice, tlle`1 operty niers trill be noiitiiei at -the chane, as reqn i-ted-sethack of he nlcuaurcd from the future acq Sit r or -ea l ?onclary, 1;xcef+ti 1 ;01 he- n the full setback ma) be :tclrrranistrati5'lily ranted 1 _ An existing purred cr 101 equals or up to Live 1)e nt-Iti ,e -t t1 an the iiih:ii:t±tii -' . e l+r +tfi l'he apl+l]cantdegt.a• - , . Such er;captinnay Fouled provided, thin: u. Tho proper;} is net 1+art-nf a zone reelassif eatien undtor su>riliviiun application; and 1a. The properly hgs no reasnnahle altepiata-ve ite-dcsign .iolutiun k, rsibi utid c. A title notice l: recoede at+ ga+3F to i i+ section -that fewther i tuts (aitch as noiee- crowding, loss urrekcti1iomt of improvements) is the sit—when-tire ntrect is widened in the: future; and d. The bur]dinz i. 1u't4.ited at the graatest setr.+ack peifigikric, but in ally c0w shall be no closer Ibur.L epic -quarter of the required setb;acl: from the future acquisition -are rl+dary and shad! not be lucuted tw+th4- -tlae-future rrccluis=iia n urea. 'Wing property_ ( 1— ndscatiing- Sign -ated ire -Frick- 'tanner that when the :Arcot ..+F. -a -ed. in Elle-fuHire u signiticunt portion oisuch lunciscaping' leatoes., such as vn-atuired. tees. relcreetcii. A majority of the trees required in the current Iartcls4aptng areas- t3+all be friantcd eight tcct from the roti=+ pfkitin178 _ )e -s@ aced no less -than (a0 feet fi'utra one another. n 12.a.t..i..., h 11 . r.te . n.kin iegtiiFed-bi , 'MidetbefU Lire - ^;t:^.• n ' f..o a nide- itc design aoluhon comp]~ tog location require n > is -feasible 1 in4swatively granted if L An exiStiEr. parcel ofot--sups Irv-i-sma.rp 4o the pcicent ]urwcr than thu minimum 10t area of the under Iyi zooet. 2. An L. rift -11;05.0 fair etf+an irrn; the applicant -adequately demonmrutes u site design. ur use Ilin ltation for the ex+{ting"l+t' ptirty. Such exceptions iway- 1� 1 .Fe propc^'.erty i not batt-ef u zone reclun3ilicotian undier applic.itinn; and b. The property P s-Ril-ice e.,A-644e-FlO4C-.e-W-geGoriled- tufeend ite-w4en- <1. The forest number -of parking stella i3 ]ocitrd in the future Ltl'dlul dhoti area cls possible a—in--any ea9e.- .ihaL1 contain no more than one quarter of the req. iced Larkins stuns for the site, The Spokane V iillcy Munioipul Code i5 c urreol thrin,gh Ordinance No- 17-01.1, passed Novcmbcr 11, 2017, Spokane Valley Municipal Code Chapter 22-130Dl DEVELOPMENT TRANSPORTATION ATTACHMENT B 11v1NROVEh°ff"NTS - E. Drainage Improvements. 't11 required-dra+ future nraltiisition uie.,..l p)rtii.FP oftlle'-r rain acgr+isiti. n Ltrcit it cundiiit,:ta1 use permit Ir,9 Lied puri shall provid._ for the rcloc}ui0t7-ol" heydraire ige ocility to an alternutivt sile by ilia property owner 152. siruel is widened. oention and -the rncam of relocating t}te facility. Pgi c 41fi he--ite-shall hz IouIted outside the nrpomrily-al[oxcd vvithin the future. Thu permit 1.,—Physical Structures, [[nproverstetaEs and i.rtilities- Rh tea . . +ng; -at d--rtr hitccturtil featttre) and improvements isuch as site (14 -nage, -2-011.-drainae novel.es, lundst:apiand-park-[ng) shall not be located within- - -tor VNI !2, Elft. Tf-permitted, Lh. shall he considered `interim' and 5tholl he rcle t. ted of i :riicived if the -richt -o1 -wit) i i ;ti i tlen .tl try !lie flame, subject to th; conditions of the cond ition akf -pee -it= ! li developers, a2eneies-Ftr:d puri a ur-J inslullir]e ull9llfes ill. adjacent ter-[ future. acquisition- a tr-and-:he r wit n. Impacts from the future street widatiia- and other r1.3[01;416'oH-c E sI alt he considered IN hen designing aril sit-jog-141lMtie5 ct E+9 --ii 3, 200.9; Ord, 08 01.16 I. 2.00. -Formerly 22-130,035), 22.13[1.119{1 Conditional °-ise permit. A. The City may temporarily n_ian interim conditional tire, site feattxe -rw-i a>provcmenls locutcd within or ri raptor: provided_ that u icted to tiktrrlratcly uctkt: loage t.tie4J-entl- adjacent to the: future a [l.lra4liott Beed -t hardship can hr dcmonstrateki and t4 a-u5,e-can he -r intent-ofthisCIlLLpter. E'i rnp1es ofsite 'f atures-€v-i 1.1 bt-roGitirea,-Barking :units. u:ilities ;and signs. }}A, Permit Required. Conditional use permits shall he issued administrxa.tivtly at o1' before the time development approvals and permits arc granted. C'otiditlona! use permits shall, at aminirnum,. specify the temporary or interim use allowed, the condition: of pe..rmaa'1, the prm.':sions for and timing of remould, relocation or installation and the responsibility for rhe cost c l-rtlu4:,.tiu[_: n 1ta5taliation- r}3, Appeals- Ary al:.ieaal e J l;7 clrl:r!=sl_;,I; : e tle:'i:, , a ;`r all ;rc h.. and .:t.~4F.xLr.. to Chapter 17,90 SVMC, Appeals. Allconditional -1 .c per;niF4 :;1_�I! i}.: t -.4r ,F 4 �„ I)_, o rii!e notice pt:: -.;Mart Lu SVMC 22.130.0M0. (Ord. 09-033 § 3, 2009; Ord. 08-0(lh § 1, 2*. Fort: rly 22.130.037). 2.130.100 Right-of-i.,r, pc.rniit alar[ 115e requirements. Rig[il-el`-Way Per'n'I `.?, ;ic.;.J i...... unless exempt .G'om permit requirements, aright -tri -way Permit is required per--.- ins construction work or otherwise engages in activity within existing City :;rir;Lructurc. A right -of -wary permit autlic rizes a permittee; W perform work or conduct activity in a,mcnt Permits shall not bc rcgts,.n.; i I, Work. done by or li_r :,. i. irl ti;ii.l in its righty-rrf way- 2, Work that is two hot : :.: :ss i;a duration, a; I, n: as that cork .:ous not r.-.10.1re the closure of more than 50 percent ofa non-artcrt.t] 1t.., ; c+,�, rim cIn"•e any 'i nc:: or_ :il urttr=i [;ir�'t°t, does iii}1 io''. r,l. .neavation within the right -of-way, or docs net Llr....o Orr 4 t:lpine:e rit O p.aveincr.t, sidewalks_ ourb: r r :fitters. Exemption from the perm i- rcquirimcnts of tine SVM(: Shall not be deemed to grant u..it]LoJi ;tioi' r y work to be Mune in any anatlner in w it,l:.°.tori F:1. 1ht art', iwi ,rrs of the SVMC: or any t tl>en lours. oreli_a:li!G ,#: it 5 a';i: _ms nft:lir jurisdiction, B. Expiration. k r.hi-of-,,,,.ay pulpits i,_ u..i bet.:.:,n Ap°i1 1st oral September 30th are valid for 30 dttvs after the date of issuance., with a mu -rime 3L'-dai4 ttit,I:r-of-way permits issued between October 1st and Mauch 31st shall be valid until the following,April 30th, The Spokane Valley ittunicipaal, wale is current through Ordinance NG. 17-01'1, p i.,tiul November 14: 2)1 r VAIL?. (..114)112:IJIJV.ELOPMENT TRANSPORTATION imP.R01117\1!-!,:TS AT1ACHIVIENT PErZ.C... C. 1..epairs. Ir. lie case of an ernergiiney iI iIII Utiriry !nay commen,.:t: Lk PHU.' 1.12 rtbrainin t! the person resr..oncil-.,':. ftir ....„-.7.HrtIctior, permit tt:ithin 4J h1ur5 tift'er work is commenced or 011 the lirs1 City blisiRess I bwhig „said claFis.:d 8-1.1our I). Right-uf-'Way Permit —Ari•!;••al ir!!! irotT• !1:ll hr.! issal..A tiniesb :74 submitted and appro.vcd by skI111, at a minimum., eentain the , C.:on struction plans or '!% if re...11! . A t' I1 control plan, 11 LI . i-; r.i 1.17C 4 -PV 1.:1(.1S&S iljiy lanes .01! 3, , 1. Prouf ortheconiractor's. and all suhc.:;1!..rac tors IIZIRCe and mquircnicnts, Dep rtsyralion phar!.... 1! At ft, .1 ;:.; code. Lcnt of thc constrt:cii.,p !nay requlre engineering, hy a W ash i .1111R.- .:.11..!,[..1.4...ants sole cost and. c..x.pcn.se, pe!R nay 1)c. availtibic fur rlircleid 1.)tniri::•.sse!s, Eli public 1 cif ay resolution inl'.1..2.1ratatt.:1: ft.r. I ne. I antninktrative (!:1.5!!. 1ilitre to ry !ALI-. Ole ▪ r!!.!!_iilaiiiirs shall oe E, Per-it'.1 I. L....E.. iri '1 lie. apj-.! icant !liri lez.!:. that. 4!.!!! ▪ helort: IS 1 rIllTif!.the 1"...iLY ..;..1111C. I! miunl rim'. isiu'_ii:cd be aFiritcztrii •,;i1a1.1 ('.;ty ror less titan 7 2 hau...-!!!..noLic.irLh.!....yortt !of an tvork renal red 1111,:terihr_'..:'ilC111-11'...1.E111C.:).i. rupoirs and , riII ll otlt...r of 1.1:61: G. II yr: !:.!21n.L.-of-way bheill ict.i i7oi thcicLio 1h:: permit.. Erie! nIJ 10 !..urr!.....rit r:!!' :Is. The SI.::.1111'0,11LeTvL.rIt;. \iiiI on I Inic...‘,rni -1 reit ic ! V," Si-1,2!.11;...1al.i!;:ins for dr ...H.: t aid %Atty.: Wofks A.). II. I ;,inta:ning Ac..m.n.', Lt ILiet ke1iy 170' 71'c perrniti..:...: cocire ...vidth of the strcut. r.: (1)a...1 laall!;11 zilrcet and cc tr. traffic U ...In:: rr...!.!. ;!..c.ortiol of the siml I kind cont:!!,....,:1 !he. ai i!!trt. poFitin ILh;.! ilf:2;i4)1C (Tcr. kinc concit-rence ehier!....1 poi ic. li1d lir,' ilt7! ie .-..cked for !of Lino: s1ii.'„ahl...1e.toi-1..7. Lin he !and !LK I such a b !ir3gd:; arprop 111,0.t, hoot iirlinecessary congestion. i.1 pi II (D.iirpol. A rly perAon or company Nit perttran... 1:Pr in activity iviltrin Isiirirj. City r!ints-of-•Aray,CFTti"..,;1 in Ir .6iroutort-, IrIIC all r4.11::..11.:.Hi yrn Tr“..1 ir Loi!Opri::11: rliar 1jt the puhf.1. satiny, i(. thc .1%.1t_11. 1. I). i h errtort or company provilk for sat uperati:in of ail equipment, vehiLes and pems righi-of-way, 1 Duni lc' i istinfi1 nItictuie. All damage to .!:.x.isling public.: or inifragWVAlre. andior properly dutin,g Iicprogf,:y; the work activit!..• sital I iI".2 re17!iirc!...1 hrit the ;.!:..riritit, 1.2114r:is r:ate.rials for RLich The Sprikatie Valley Municipal Colic is tttrren I Ihrotigli Ortliname Ni. 174114, wsscd Novo -I -ibex -14,2017- t.1;,;.•- -.1 IUJLILN1rANSFORTAT1ON 1 ATTACHMENT B Pilj.T. 6/6 '..1.11aderr1ea JtthIjiii, ihiricee.F.ser:. hibor arid FLIclibiS air coli Said lobo. Id rinieriak fariklied h. the City !IN' Ili.? Nei-11'17;2e.uI i i hiI bL iLir paid h the pen-ant:cc and • L die hond vial If pGrui T.) .jorcjitiun ;Lipur) eAriirariirri C.l bperol'it or shall otherwise rail '1. L t ion, work ki)'red cuen perm ti :)i 1 iter.L. f the [eIflhitlCC roc: •,:10:1 [17C 1%;1'.. construction work, t0..• ..1.) do till neec_sr‘ary to reAF.: the riglIL-o-way andfor .[,...;k:•;11C-AL 7.1,] .1111E-01:-1.V.t1:," eonsn.oc.:..71 Ic pet-milice shollbt' e For all cot s and expenses of. rtslorai ion it -pr cornpfetIOn. The City sitiI hii fi...au.se of 'Hrs.id alnoulitt: paid for su4.:11 tyork 0 Ioiiig deinarid, the City may diforot its.figh.t5 N. tJdlticii! periuiL, i I the invoice for City...pi:Trot-mud work has leen paid. L. 7.1. "i_ ift:'• City S2Ti1'C'Er..ly i.) !,i )I€ or -.he Cr:11 2..::1117."...1.; .!I 7C,] I1: Ii 1;71I••• 01 2kiZi(11•111. pe]ic....9thAll [UMW L.11;-. i 1i Ii 1.+02;1 C. I:11C I ina.-‘e 11.,....ort•rd i Harriles.s: and hold Firl-!ess fie tis and v....it:1ie...1.1 c1:11• i. penny': issueLl exe,2pr ctiuseLl byih ile......-digence or viI,I tit] N. Rules ane1PoLii....y. To in. plemcnt the permit peovide fortbre publiU health 4t1(1 o1y, Fie Ott. undo: ti Jprti, lsion of policicz L....oilist6nt with this section. All adn7it‘t,. ii iIs. 1)01 icie iod 1r n shallbc itii the. city clerk. Any porF,on viojaling this section shall bu subject lu til I enfolvernent actions and perl...:11.H , toolifFitiod411 VM('. i( )rd. 09-013 § 3,2009; Ord. 07-0 t5..§. 4,2007 Polinerly 22. i 30.0 I]. 0 ). 22.131L 110 Liability. ot...11%; Cit.!, 0 rS•pok-ilute.: I k he re.so•:.‘7., t. Cc -r compliance with the provisions -or this with the v•er.:1111 ard rhei:. inti. This FoipIiand irc provisions arc adapted %villa lilt Lo protect 112 V:c.!fai.c.: fththe afe. nor intended to protect any 0,.d. 07-015 4. 2007. borrnerty 22.130.09n),. Tim tipaane• Valley fvlikriiciPal 2odc i amid Ihri High Orditionee No, I7-014, passed Novin-nbur 14„ 2017. Street Standards Spokane 4.••0°Ua11ey Adapted. December 2009 Revised February 2018 (111' OF SPO ANE VALLEY sTRr!. •:'f. STANDAR CHAPTER 1 - INTRODUCTION Chapter Organization 1.1 Title 1 1.2 latent and Yrnvisions i 1.3 Objectives of Street Standards 1 1.3.1 Miniaxm Standards 1 1.3.2 Objectives 2 1.4 Authority 2 1.4.1 Developrnent Services Senior Engineer ..... 3 1.4.2 Senior I'r:iffic 3 1.4.3 Senior('apital Projects engineer 3 1.5 Document Or'gan.izatinn 4 1.6 Amendments. and Rcvisions to Standards 4 1.6.1 Puiy Revisions. 4 1.6.2 1 c. i7 _ic- I1 Rcvisions 4 1.7 inLc.rpre.trtlk.. ;,1 Sti'1nK1ards 5 1.7.7 Coy n:2. Slrirltlttrds 5 1.72 Prior Arc FiILi, Lice of Construction Plans ..... 5 1.7.3 SeverabiIiLy .., 5 1.8 Contact Informa[ion 6 1.9 R.eference Material... 6 1.10 Variance 7 1.11 Design Deviations 7 1.12 Abbreviations 8 1.13 Definitions--_..., 10 Aclopted-Deem her -2449 1- Ch{aplr7 1—TnlruducLiain Cf t'Y 01 SE C)K.\NE.: vAl,1,FY STREET STANDARDS THIS IS 1r TEr4TIuNALLV LEvr BLANK C1rsFrtcr 1 - Introduction L -ii CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY STREET S I ANI)AR 11 TITLE These regulations, along with all Future arn.endnlcnts, shall be lunowri,, as the City of Spokane Valley Street Standards (hereinafter called "Standards" or " Strcct Standards"), 1.2 INTENiT AND PROVISION Thee Standare.s apply to all capital and development p%jets within the City's I iwit,T and to the extent allowed by law, to those projects outside of City limits that impact City infrastructure or transportation systems, When 11+11-eom a capital project impracticable or IP feasible,„ exeepLi-un6- hit -be granted for reconstruction, 1: The City's review and approval of any plans, reports, or drawings, or the City's inspection and approval of any improvements designee! and constructed by the Applicant in accordance with these Standards; does not constitute a representation, warranty, or guarantee by the City that such improvements are lite From defects or will operate adequately for the purpose intended. The chapters and appendices that make kip these Standards pertain to planning, design, approval, con traction, inspection, testing, rnaintenar.ce and docurrsc:niatiorl of street improvements, The intent of this manual is to establish the minimum acceptable sianc[artk. L3 O13,1 C,CTIVES OF STREET STANDARDS 1.3,1 111NI .11.'.V1 STAN I}hl ,IMS Those Standards shall be the. minimum standards necessary for de!.;ign and constru.tion](]['alistreet�rclatod and sonic onsite private irnproiemenL4;ir !ilei Special sit , I aLi ons, as determined by the CITY, may require different fac i I it i e and/or standtn i] . 1 -or items not covered by these Standards. the City may require the use ni oLr+cr sf_and rfls as referenced in Section 1.9, EL is incumbent upon t[r. Applicant's ,.:nanitteerto use: good engineering practice and to be aware of, and implement, :_i :ti ciesitn practices and procedures that reflect current techniques in civil (a,g,r:::.ring, Good .engineering practice is detirtccl in these Standards as pmfe:ssie)n_al. .r;u? c tIn a#[ cennditucL that mccts the current codes and regulations adopied for I,v'ii.::r9. Tltc proposed design shali consider fiinctionality,. constructability s ; r,.rtiem: and maintt:mince, including thu health, safer./ and welfare of the public. ,VIciplctt t)eLcmhrr 2469 (.1-01.01' 1 - I"Irk7 li:c;iirn (Try sPO !(AN1:STREET STANDARDS 1.3.2 OBJECTIVES It is the objective, of the sc Standards to address the following: ▪ 1'o provide for an efficient transportation system and Prnprove local circulation and emergency access by providing connectivity between residential. streets and arterials; • 'l'o extend the functional life of the existing transportation systems and increase its safe and e Ticient operation; ▪ In ensure public facilities and services mixt level of service standardsa ai optedcstahlished in the Comprehensive Plan; • To encourage the use of public streets in new development; • To protect the public health, safety, environment, and welfare to the greatest extent possible resulting fium construction. ration and maintenance activities within the public rights-of-way; • To ensure the primary rases of the public rights-of-way arc 1'L r bicycle, pedestrian and vehicular travel; ▪ To ensure the public rights-of-way are4 properly maintained-4ufing is n and repair work in these area^,; To protect the City's infrastructure investment by establishing standardized design, materials,. construction, and repair criteria for alI public itnprovements, ▪ To optimize the is of the limited physical capacity of public rights-of-way held by the City; • To provide. an efficient permit system that regulates and coordinates activities in an effective and safe manner; • 'I`o protect private and public property from damages that could occur because of faulty design and construction; and, • `I'o provide cri feria fur inspection c+f'public and private im.provernents, in order to ensure 'e confbrrnamcc with the approved plans, proper c.:nstruction techniques, and to ensure that atce;eptatble materials are '.:,-2L1 for the ecxnstr•rtction process of such public andlar priv'r 1.4 Authority la dle +ging-s heft -d Standartln. ,-1.4441trr, tls e-2 l-2 erit tivef-t-hesc ('EL3pLe t - Intrnducdian CITY OF SPOKAN1:. VA I STRITT STANDARDS The -Development Services Senior Engineer is part of the Development Services Division of the Co eT—Retitrire development projects to provide and improve future acquisition areas, dedicate -right-of-way and border easements, construct new streets, anditor-iinprove-exi•sting, infrastructure to the applicable standard pursuant to b. Make sl-ight-irtix4ritat4lOilS1:0 the standard sections for public streets when site condition,-WallE434-6 tu-a-1.0V GI that- is Ogila I 1105 or exceeds the requirements set forth in these Street d. Make revisions-to-the-Mrtet-Standards in accordance with Section 1,6; and, 4,41 Senior Traffic Engineer The-Stiffici-Traille Engineer is part of the Traffic' Divisicm the Public Works Depof•tfoent-and has- the 41Lithority to: SAFMC 22.20; etyiTteet or exceed the applicable Manual on 1 J-niforni Traffic Control Devices (1414--T-G14)-4arrel-ards:= d. Ensure that capital projects and development projects meet ur oxceed the traffic requirements set forth in Chapter 3: and, c. Impose other traffic requirements to the extent alio% ed 133 iho lkw. : ; T1 ' The Senior Capital Projects Engineer is pail of the-C-ttpitai4ffigweveivient•-Pregfein - • : level that is equal to or eyrceeds the requi+ements set forth in. these Street Standards; .Section 1,1 I; and, el7a- FIFf4 when site conditions warrant in ;IC 013+E1414€4...! with So,..tion 4.11. -3 Chapter 1 - IiiiuLFi CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY sTREET S'17A0N117ARI)S T.4DOCUMENT ORGANIZATION Then- Standards :tri generally organized as described billow: a Chapter 2 describes typical project requirements; • Chapter 3 describes traffic ttna]ysis requirements; ■ Chapter 4 describes requirements for plan submittal; • Chapter 5 desciihe requirements for clearing and grading; ■ Chapter 6 describes requirements for LiLi1it , ....'ork; • Chapter 7 describe:. , eq : ,cements • Chapter 8 aescr hes L_'.i cements forpavemeriL design; • chapter 9 describes reL_r: °cements for inspection and certification; • Chapter 10 :Iesc ibex. in and; * Chapter 11 pi J _ rl7r (.' j w Stnrida,.41 1.5AMEN❑MENT REVISIONS 1'0 )1 A_i. t" )A DS Thc: Street Standards may be periodically amended as necessary to provide , d.iith ri l elarily or to re_I1c.et • haligcs or in ccn:-u"uctictr4 or engineering practice" Such revisions to these Standards ]ll it Ltkiiwl t of 4:rtlter -policy" irevisiorls or "technical' revisions. The City will maintain ztni ch clronic Ale of these. Standards. All updates and revisions will be available or tlic City web page or at the City Clerk's office. 4:441.5.1 I'()L1CY REVISIONS Policy: revisions shall be considered major char"les, chines in law and chnhp:es that will cause significant increased c.o::: or r; I;�t:'r . �.::I c.; Icvl,ions fil{;n include those changes that relate to the publie use: cin`] c ::'li+: , ,, w. , snch as changes in sLandiaixl street width. Policy revisions require a public Etc£trrlig pro css tOr their adoption. and Council iipprevttl, 44141.5.2 l I' CH 111CAL REVISIONS Technical revisions shall consist of minor additions, clarifications_ revisions, and cxrrc°cti.::rw the Scree; Stiridaardand Cil; stti.rt'_]ar.'cl Eyy he necessary to to good e11g1I1ec.:!'Irig 'anti/or 4C}IISt 4i41t1 [1 s;i:l)1Jarc r:;' d pfactice. recisions shall be: Consistent with all existing policies relevantto the revision; -The pub Iic-s health, suety an>!d welfare; uiari,\ these Stairidards; or, Adfloi ii rtvo`z —24:14 i . aplce 1 - IniroduProli 114 k :t; :.t:STREET STANDARDS cl. Consistent with existing ];iw. Tochtileal. revisions shall beeomc effective when approved in writing. If technical revisions are deemed necessary, the revisions may c ecur through either; c. Planned periodic revision; or f. An accelerated process. ]f n technical revision is determined to be immediately necessary, then, the change shall be made and notification given on the web page. Document holders on record wit]i the CiLya will he notified of the changes. 4,71.6INTERPRETATION OF STANDARDS In the interpretation and application of the provisions of':hc Street Standards, the following principles shalt apply: 1x7.11.6.1 GOVERNING STANDARDS Whenever a provision of the Street Sitiric3rrrcls or any provision in any law, ordinance, resolution, rule, or regu[{scion of iiny piaci tion.win5 restrietions covering any of the same subject matter, the standards that t are more. restrictive or impose higher standards or recluiiernenL.s shall govern. 47741.6.2 PRIOR ACCEPTANCE OF CON S'1"1/ IJ C.l' I O N PLANS The Str-eet Standards shall not modify or after any street construction plans that have been filed. with and accepted by the City pries to the effective date of the ordinance o•' re�oJution adopting the Street Standards. This exception shall be subject to the conditions and limitations under which said plans were accepted by the City. 4,:7.3 SEVERABILITY If any section, sentence, clause-tyr--phFase-ofthesc Standards should he held invalid or unconstitutional_ the validity or eckns ` f shall not affect the. validity or constitutionality of Linn &t#t ren. scnten.cc, clause or phrase of these Stnndai+ds. ,,q#p.cd Yti_,.elabtc_ 2OO C'haoter 1 - lntrothrcth n 1-5 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY STREET STANDAR ILS 1.8 -CONTACT INFORMATION comim-tm-itcy-Deixelopment-Depurttnent City of Spokane Valley 41707 t . Spri uc, 'u to 106 Spokane Valley, WA 99206 '4-ha]neh 009)-42-1-147).0.4 FtiN. (501) 688 0037 Plibile-Werks-Depurtnietit City of Spokane Valley -11707 E. Sprague.. 'St, tc 106 Spokane Valley, WA 99206 Phern -i 5.0.9) 921 1000 Pkix (500) 688 0261 reyeiitien nffkc 13319 t- Sprague Spokane Valley, WA 99206 P nL:(509) 928 170 Fax (509) 892 4125 City of Spol4inc 4'r l Iey 11707 E. Sprague, Suite 106 SpolEane-Valley, WA 99246 Phone. (5 09) 921 1000 Fax -(409-)-92-1-1408 City of Spokane VaI Icy 11707 E. Spr agLre. Suite B 3 Spokane Valley, WA 9921)6 Phone (509) 720 52'10 Fax (509) 688-014 Fire Protection District 8 [ 2100 E Paloua Higgh.A.ay AktfleyfoRI, WA 99036 Phone (509} 926 6699 F 91.7REFERENCE MATERIAL 'I'lie Street. Standards are supplemented by the CLYrrerll V°oi'sIL3n of the "Washington State Department of ' i'e ansportation1Americatn Public Works Association (W SDOT/A PWA) Standard Specifications for Road, Bridge and Municipal Construction._" latest edition. The Street Standard Details are eompritied of the. City's construction and design detail drawings for grading, storm drainage, and street work within the City that are supplemented by the current version of theWash-iiwin State C)epiififFie riL LrF Transportation (WSDOT) "Standard Plans for Road, Bridge and Municipal Constr cti€ n." The current versioneditioi o Fthe following publications s#tm+iti-shalt be used as additional reference material for design applications, when situations are not addressed bw these Street Standards or WSDOT Standards. Every subsequent reference to iii o[Lhuse puiblications in the Street Standards shall be to the currentil, adorned version unless specifically stated to the contrary. whether stated or not. Other standard technical references ma be. used if approved by the City Engineer: a. American Association of State 1 I ighway and Transportation. Officials' (AASDTO) "A Poli. y on Geometric Design of 1 [ ig17ways and Struts" fGrreen, Book) b. A ASH- f} Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities c. AAS1F1"70 Sr3nd rd Specifications for 1 [ighway Bridges d. Ancricart3 with Disabilities Act (A]?A).AccessiltiiIi.y Guidelines c. American Socio; y tor Testing and Materials (A4 STM) f, Associated Rockery Contractors, Standard Rock- Wall Construction Guidelines r'ti[4optc.cl T7ec rnhiLr 2009 I-6 Cliaprt:r I - Trir0:1 1cl.iUn CITY OF 1.ANDAR.t)s g. Cil., . f.SpokalGc: Valley ,'fnniciipal Code h. Fccyct',iI i1i:tl7yyw rAdmirk...rr. tion CIA 1W A) 1:ng_ineerin Manual 3. 1 n _ ineers (]'1'f?)'l rip Generation k. Intcrnritio;nai Fire Code adopt=ed by the City of Spokane 1. Washington Model Traffic Ordinance (Chapter B-330 \\'AC) im Spokane.. Count). Stanci,.rds for Road and Sewer Construction n. Spoktanrcgriunal Sturrnwatcr Manual o. U. S. L7�r:Himont of Transportation Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devious, (IL)1(.[))) p" Wash ,xn 'Department of Ecology Stormwater ivlanagement Manual for Eastern Wa•.11 iigtcln q, Washington Stale 1)epartm€;nl of Transportation (WSDOT) Design Standards r. WSDO I Guidelines for LJrbaan Arterial Prog=ram. s.. 'SDD(]'f I.c.c.al Agency Guidelines t. WSDOT Standard Specifications ror Road, Bridge and I lunicipal Construction. 11, WSDOT "Design Standards" v. Design erireria of federal agencies including the Federal l lousing Administration, Department of Housing and 4Jrban I)evelopment, and the Federal. Highway Administration, Department of Transportation 1.10 Variance The r'equir'ements established ire--C-f apter 2 can variance. Refer to SVMC 'Tiede 19.170 for \ari-anr ra pfeets and requirements. 1.141.8 DESIGN DEVIATIONS In special eases, strict application of Street Standards may not best address a particular engineering situation. In these cases, a design deviation may be requested" Design deviation requests shall be on the City's form and include applicable engineering justification fir the deviation. The Development Services Senior Engineer is authority to deny Svc a de,3:ig.n c1eviation regie;,t for development prcrjeAs. -For capital probe -the aer rite lees with -he Senior Capital Projects I?ngkneer. a. The Applicant, shall request a design deviation when either of the following situations applies: i. The project proposes non-standard methods, analysis; design elements or materials: or, ii. Tho project proposes design elements above raxirnum criteria en- below the minimum criteria found in these Standards. b. A design deviation will only he considered for review The design elements proposed do not conflict with or modify a condition of approval; and, .tdapl of T)au..rnI-cr 29TO CFS epic r 1 Tr,tl ,cis, iron 1-7 CET Y CIF SP CIR AYE V:.;. L. r. L' Y 1.1? i. I :,.. 1 i. `.1.! ii. Thu design clernenis proposed are lased on .=.ound engineering principles, and are not inconsistcnf with the public intearest, and the City's golds and policies. c. Tcr nap., esiFer .s:,1cratioH cFf a design devia[ on, the App1k mt shall submit P. design deviation request and supporting documentation. The supporting documentation shall include sufficient inforn-Eation for the City to make 4 decision as to Lha- adequacy of the proposal. The design deviation package shall demonstrate that: i. There: arc special physical circumstances or conditions affecting the property that-mayprohibitthe application of some of the requirements r fthesc standards; ii. Every effort has been made to find alternative ways to meet the objectives of the Street Standards; iii. Approving the design deviation will not cause adverse impact on down gradient or adjac;enL properties, public health or welfare; and,. iv. Approving the design deviation will not adversely affect the. goals and policies the Ciiy's Comprehensrfi r Plan,. ;Spokane J''crli?cy unicripal Code, 6531Ar,gtre C'1ndAP ITe Ft irlurYAban r. Plan, .titre-: MaSter flan, and Tr°anspuNatiun Improvement Plan. 1.121.9 ABB} EVT A TIONS 7.TheI) clic f 1k wirig abbreviations appear in these: Standards, they shall mean the fo I I ov,.ing: PASHTO American Association of State Highway and Transportation {}fficcials ADA Americans with Disabilities Act A1Yr. Average wily Trips APW'A American Public 4rork.k ASA American StLirL ]ardS A S.I.?1 American Soeic.ty B MPs Best !Y'Jaiiaagk:nii::ln Practices CBR California Hearing Ration CC&Rs Covenants.. Codes and Restrictions CESCL Certified i .resioii rind Sediment Control Lend CSBC Crush surfacing Kase course CSTC Crush surfacing top course .l)611 I ) i ameter Breast Heigh( I:SA1 A I-- LIivale ji[ Sirtgle-Axlc Loads I.SC: Erosion and Sediment Control FAA Federal al Aviation Administration'i'uture Acquisition . Ftlif Ativ ed 1}..ccsllbcr 20D!) Chrapi. r N - TnIroitiiuLidin CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY STREET .STAN t)A..Ft1)S FEMA 7cdejal Emergency ManagenlenL Agee .) l l IW A . wedera[ I I ighway Administration ['OP -field Operating Procedure GMA C�rcuwLh Management Arica f 1C M lighway CapaciLy° Manual HMA Hot. Mix Asphalt HOA Homeowner ° s Association IBC International Building Code IFC !international Firc Code IRC international Residential Code I'I F Institute of'franspnrtat ori Engineers LOS ievrel of Service Res1Iient Modulus Ml:'l {;I) "v1 an ua I on 4Jill llconn .1 raAle C:un(roI. De. vi .c s O&M C)perai1 ons and Maintenance l'I ^'coin1 o Inaci.sceLion PC Point of Curvature PCR Point of Curve Return PE Frolssionai Engineer PCIS Pollution Generating Impervious Surfaces PLS Professional I .and Surveyor POA Property Owner's Association PT Poi nt of Tangency W Revised Code of Washington SI PA State l :nvironanentil. Policy Act St Street. intersec Lion Std EtaLe Route SRSM SpukAnc Regional Stortnwater Mauuai SRTC Spokane Regional Transportation Count,: I SMC Spokane Valley Mun i c ipal Code TESC Temporary lUosion and SedimernLa1i nbuntrol TIA Traffic Impact Analysis. C'htipkcr 1-Tr+krcxitickiun 6-9 CITY Or SPOKANE V ALLEY STREET STANDARDS •1'1P transportation n Improvement Program IISGS United States Geological Survey WAC Washington Administrative Code WAQTC Western Alliance for Quality 'l`ransporIalitrn Construction WSDOT Washington State Department °I -Transportation 44-11.111 DEFINITIONS iS For the purpose or Mese Street Standards,. certain v ,ords.nrtd terms are herein dunned. The word "shall' is always mandatory. The word "may" is permissive, subject to the judgment of the person administering the code.---The-v, - . -- - - rir, recommended but not required.. These definitions take precedence over those found elsewhere iit the SVNIC. In [he event a technical term is not listed below, iklinitions shall be taken from the WS!X.?`I' Design Manual, Access Management: The concept of' Li public agency controlling the location of access poirts in order to achieve the dura] purposes of providing access to individual land uses and limiting access on higher order streets in order to facilitate the smooth flow of traffic with a limited amount orimpedance. Applicant: The party or parties desiring to construct a public or private improvement or project within City rights-of-way, casements or private property, securing all required approvals and permits from the City, and assuming full and complete responsibility tsar the project_ The Applicant may be the: Developer Owner or the individual designated by the I)evelnperl4wntiF tea act on his behalf Binding Site flan: A division ()Nand approved administratively by the I]epartmen1 or Community Development, 'which legally obligates Li person making a pmpn,sas to conditions, standards or requirements specified by. these Standards and rile S1'i(:. Border Easement: A dedicated easement on private property adjacent tn public street right-of-way established for the purpose °futility, drainage tai:ilitics, pedestrian <ic.ces.s or other pudic purpose. Building Division: The Division at the City of Spokane Valley responsible for reviewing, issuing and certifying construction permits. Builder: Tiie parte or parties desiring to constrercl a public or private project which may include Unproven tents, ith ire the boundaries o: --the Applicant's project. Dili Ider s project mean. include but not be limited, to landscaping. paving. sIor-mwater taci]iriest structures r.rr d instalratiori of facilities or utilities to support the Btillder-s project. Certificate of Occupancy: An official certificate issued by the City building official that indicates conformance with all_ applicable provisions of the SVMCi requirements rand zoning regulations. and authorizes legal use of the premises for which it is issued. Adopted, 14e comber 2(109 Chapter 1- reduction CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY S.I'RI'EI' STANDARDS Certification Package: A packet. prepared by the Onsite Inspector including, but not limited to, Mylar record drawings, weekly reports, certification checklist ind related construction documents, for review by the; City to determine project acceptability. City: City of Spokane Valley, Washington. ('itu F.nginccr -- .1.he City l.nr?ineer rir his dul; trulhori cd representative, Clear Zone:.A relatively flat arca void of fixed objects or obstructions beyond the edge of the traveled way that allows drivel's to stop safely or regain control of a vehicle that leaves the traveled way. Clearing and grubbing: includes, but is not limited to, removing trees, stumps, roots, brush, structures, abandoned utilities, trash, debris and all other materials found on or near the surface of the ground in the construction arcs. Concurrency: A reclttiremcnt that those public fazilities and services necessary to support development shall be adequate to serve the development at the time the development is available for occupancy and use, without decreasing the current level cifservice helow locally established minimum standards adopted by the City. Contractor: ']'he individual, partnership, firm or organization to whom a construction contract has been awarded by the Applicant, or who has been issued a right-of-way work permit by the City, for work covered by the contract. Agents, employees, workers, subcontractors, or designers employed by the Contractor shallafe also he bound by the terms of the contract or permit. Corner Clearance: At an intersecting street, the distance measured along the curb l ine from the projection of the intersecting street .flow line to the nearest edge of the curb opening, County: Spokane County. Design Deviation: An administrative approval of design elements that do not conform to or are riot explicitly addressed by these Standards. of a 'facility. 'Phis person shall he a Washingiowlieensed professional engineer. Developer: Owner ofthe Project and/or Developm._nt. Owner ma4 be an individual, corporation,. government or ioverninental agcnuy. business mist. estate. mist, partnership, association, or some combination of the foregoing.: Development: Any man-made change to improved or unimproved real estate in c I u d i ii the division of land with potential for construction. Development Agreement: The contract bet i..-i:.r }1c City ::iicl defines public improvement requirements, costs,. t:,.. cr:he , reia tcl pub:.i.:;.- issues. ALIO rrtld t)ittler 1109 Cli ,[er 1 - 1„troducriar CITY OF Slur)1( /NNE Vr LLEY STREET STANDARDS Development Inspector: A City employcc, responsible fOl. coordinating with the CJiss]te Inspector(s), reviewing and accepting certification packages and warranty sureties. and recommending public streets for establishment. Driveway: Any area, improvement ar facility between a public ur private street and private property, which provides ingress/egress for Vehicles from a public or private street to a 13t or parcel or to a structure constructed on the lot or parcel. 'whichever is 1srnyer. Driveway Approach: 'I he transition at the end of a private street or driveway. where it connects to a public or private street. For details, see standard plans. Easement: lan - Eatsement: A right to use the land o1' others. The right may he from the common law or may be acquired, usually by purchase or condemnation and occasionally by prescription or inverse condemnation. The right is r_ot eNclusive, but subject to rights of others in the same land, the lesser right being sLrDscrvient to a prior right which is dominant. Easements for drainage may give; rights to impound, divert, discharge or concentrate surface flow, extend pipelines, deposit. silt, erode, scour, or any other necessary cunsr:cluence of a development. Engineer: Shall -mean a professional enginraer Professional Engineer defrni1-ie Engineered Driveways:. Driveways, which due to their length, surface area or other situational Cactors, are required to he designed by a professional engineer licensed in the S tate. oPA4Fohingtiaft. Engineering — City Grt irieerina Department Fill: A deposit of earthen material placed by artificial means. Fire Department: Fire district having jurisdiction. Fire Lane: An access designated ILO accommodate emergency access Loa parcel of land or its improvements. Final Acceptance: The written notification from evelepnient—Engirrecring, alter the Development Services SeniofCi[ ; Engineer finds the Warranty Period to be satislaetori y completed, that all public improvements are free of defects, and the City rc[cases the Applicant from future maintenance obligations. Frontage Improvements: Required irnprovernems on public Sil-CaS fronting the property w_Iicli typically include. pavement widening, curb, gutter, grassy Swale; and sidewalk. Fbrtrf '€lentificd on property as potential right -of way for the ea:Jemeuit area. Graining: The physical manipulation of the earth's surface and/or surface drainage pattern which includes surcharging. preloading, contouring, cutting, and tillirr to L:stahlish final site grades. Half -Street lmprovcments: Shall m r The construction oFfrontage itriprovement on [he sire, -,,,t fronting the property or development, including paving from the street A.doptcd Dzccmbcr 20O4 1-12 c'haptcr 1 - iniriJdlldiLSri cfr 0!. ;'i It EFT STANDABDS centerline, curb, gutter, swale or grassy strip, and sidewalk, pin,um of a 12 - foot lane or_ the opposite sake of centerline with a onic.I--tb t ;`rave I Thou Idvr and grassy ditch. !orstortnwatcr treatment, I'Iie final paiventent toic:ltll ;li{II& be at least 'Tt feel. Tinprow`entenlst All public or private itrlpi`•.::'.cruents within City right:-c.i-way, e Easements .Jr+private property, 1)evelopiir:•1!i .:1 at public: tha' private street, typically including some or all of the folio ing: t-LL;*.•:Ii: I!I . Curb. Eintter, landscaped swatle, sidewalk, drainage; improverne.nts. Intersecting Sight Distance: The distance rie;,':;w.; . •::11' the t i' ver kira motor vehicle stopped al an interSceetion Dr drivewa} t[5 SCC. approaching vehicle;, pedestrians, and biccy°c.lists along the intersecting major stl`..t:1 and have sufficient ,pace to make any move to or'SS 11'SC: iUter;ection or merge. with [Tank without ccl.,sing vehicles, for bie. e]isft.. trwelin4> at or near the €k -sign spe,::1 ,)ti the major street to slow {i, ',':n t'lre controlling dist:once For design is uiti di -ranee, generally the tomergc. trAtic. I. tnil I)isturbing Aciivil `: The I c7,-,11 It hi a change in ::tistiJt_ w, -+,i .2r.tti .e or .'ti7'1-t'cgetative) or site tupogriip1'y. 1.alld disturbing aieLlv!liti... 11I(1.?lir are not Iiiilrted to, demolition, •.x)irvlria.:l'icii, '!cr:r'ing and grubbIn , tl'; C.!ri!_ .;I!t1 logging_ I.cv'e! of Service (LOS); of a public. facility or se... c: c.,pe:aiii-Ina] characteristiUr; �t4 r] t. L<1.L+_: ilti 1';kri 11r1SrrC . Offsite lmprca 'etnen[s: (.:~I; .ill„titisxrr nl~ t iiiUL' located away from and up to a project site, 11ecestiar to _;;I', y+i!t ''.i ;!t',e''opii t nt or to mill-gCai+T Cl eCtS of the develop-init. Onsite Cnspectur: A gnaliflecl i7i: s:: -in or firm. hircrl Pplicarit tr:' 1)... imr, responsible fbrproject ittspec.i;;:,rl i1r,.1 certilicaLion. Pollution Generating Inal:l, rriionas Surface (PGIS): 111LI)ti'1'wil t! surfaces that erre i gni ficant Sources of pulltasaants in stoi rriwater runoff, Such stir`Fitccs include chose that a:e sul.lc .t L{) vehicular use,. industrial activities, or storage of erodible .?I leachable ni aterialti than i -c: i}w° direct ]air'thll. or run-on .ir blow-in ol'rairttadl. Metal rt ois ru`e considered to he 1't,ES Lullw:wv oa/ed with an orlert. n :rn-leachable• indierial. Roofs tis•at the subject to venting' 0 r iii/Li [tteILII`aCl . .ilrri 01 Er'C ILI or (Aker r i11L1oor pellutantw ar`4. rikri 4: iiiSIt1CP'eLt [-'f IIS. A sat rauc,. payed cir not.. small 17e ennsiL1C'red PG1S i lr is regularly I.ised motor rehie.l:'. Tho following are considcrcd rc•i"rilariy-used sut`t c : streets. ii i-VeifctatLd 5L''eel. ]toll1ders, bike lanes ..A.1°. i01 t:ICLI la[1L. if treCL.. dtive.,,kys, parking lots, unfenced fiirc lanes, vehm_1!+ttr egLtrpn1L;nt 51. Ira yatrtIs, ani :i irjxir'# I'tl Ilk '?ll'w Pre -Construction 'leering: A ittoz iri , bct wecr+ the 1)e.,ii:=°tier and atssigued at erxtw, the Onsite ]risl?t•:c.r, or, Lind the I)cvc]oprnettt Ir;s nCtC-+r co rev ie.A. prt)pr;SL'0 14.i?rk iiecessssry to e+-}i1,5trtlt:f rl;e pr'c1ieCt.. 17,r'C,r to proc(:!...diii .' til; the. work. A meeting may be required for each project, atthe l)evelo}nncnt irnsp:;.:t.u's clisere.;ioo. Private Street: A focal access street that is privately fawned and maintained by capable and legally 'responsible owner(s). 1-r Ctthprci 1 - trare4il+t:lio, CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY ti i'Riit•:l STANDARDS Prokssionat Engineer (P.E..) (or Eii incerl: A civil engineer licensed in Washington under Chapter 18.13 I&CW who is qualified by examinaation and/or experience to practice in the fields of civil, geotcciulical and/or soils engineering. Professional Land Surveyor (P L.S.) l+►r Survevorl: A Washington licensed land surveyor, Project: The puh l.:, }r- ;r, -i vat imprc?vement(s) designated iri the approved plans, which are to he coy stnick'd ii i c iinrmance with these Standards. The term "Project" includes any ;au,' ;;!I I,ui:lic or priv{tle improvement projects for or within the City; whether developiThL,nr pry jects, private utility projects, or capital improvement projects. Public Improvements: I • Iitic; to be loaned within the rights-of-way or border efte .,nent Nhich include pavement, curb and gutter, sidewalk, pe c..striaiLhiI<e:equesirian paths, storm drain facililie., bridge, water distribution or ti-aasniissioi7. tticilities with related appurtenances, pavement markings, signage and. striping, trE.ffic signals and relined appurtenances, erosion control and right-of-way grading, or earth excavation processes integral to construction of other public improvements listed herein_ Punch list, Initial or Final: A written list of wort: items, compiled by the Granite Inspector, which do not conform to these Standards, the plans or SVMC'cr that govern the project and require correction prior to project appror' a 1. Record Drawings; Original approved design drawings, updated by an professional engineer which depicts all modifications fiotn the design that occurred during consirLie 10:1, Redevelopment: Removal or modification of existing improvements and construction oFrielry improvements or substantial remodeling.. Regional Pavement Cut Policy: A regional policy adopted by the City of Spokane Valley, City of Spokane, and Spokane County. Fe4F tc cutting or replacing street i€n . r rg ;str-ttotif et.< Rights-of-w;y (Also "public right-of-way"): The land area (owned by the City) which was -ticcKtriredprovided by tri acquisition or dedication for public use of streets, utilities, walks, and other: uses, inclttdinbi providing access to adjoining properties. Right -of --}nay Permit: A permit, with or without conditions specified by the City, which allows an. Applicant to construct any -public or private improvements within the lwuhlie rig]r,.-of'way or border easement. SaIhdiviNion : Sh ELotie Subdivision: A division of land resulting in the creation o#' I.0 or more 9 -or fewer lots. Short S il.}divlsi'Hi: A division cit laid re5u16w;r in the cr4ai !.7ir of trine or fever lots. AL,ptc�l P.ctlither 2009 Chapter 1 - lntyoduction 1 1I ('r I \' CA. SPOKANE \•ALLEY sTKi? :'I STANDARDS stove, l c'cs er alalc: `:lop or. ..hid). a motorist marl' retain or regain control of a srtai]pl;.ig• lopes flatter than 4.1 are generally considered rec•c v t;r;r_}IL•. Slope,. oil-reeovctai.,lc: A.dope considered being traversable but on which an errant vehicle, continues to I-,•.-•rt.;atro Embankment slopes Iie.weerl 3:1 and 4:1 may considered traversable :Ira# nen re : k t;;'ablc i otic' are smooth and frac of fixed objects. Specifications: i:y.d.,sutiel'or and v'r,]Itl,. tl ,]tit,llLed hy the City. Speed - 85th Percentile.: ;.lr '; elow. w']iic1i 85%rt of the n.utorist', drive on a riven street unaffected G;' s1.-: er traffic 01poor weather. I lik pend indicates the. speed that mot ]naturists cs<, .the street consider safe. and reasonable urid,•,- idcatl ccarnii:it}ils, Street: .A I nhi c or privative way liar eliictL ar Lrartiel, c'. BILIS }':' c!t the sidewalk or shoulder even though such sidewalk or shoulder is used H.' mesons ridin bicycles_ Strut Classilica.tiowns: 'Mc ider]tilit;atiori ota street according tci difererat levels of emphasis on tiatfie movement lour ::s direct r•Rcee.,s to properly. Surety: A financial instrurner;I. securing the AppIie'r.nt":; re. pon.sibility to complete c<rnstrw [JOrr of public or private improv IND ctrts within an approvc.LV put}ieet• Surety' shall a[!‘„0 mean: a financial instrument scouring the Applicant's obligations throughout the Warranty Period, Sureties approved by the City include cash, letters of credit and savings ats3]grlIncrlt, Surely, Perfur'niance: A surety securing the App icant's responsibility to complete construction of pr]bl ic. or private improvements witl-in an unproved project. Surety, Rarraitllry: A surety sc Turing the Applicant's obligations throughout the warranty period; required of projects in the public right-of-way and border easements, guaranteeing against defects in street constfl ctinn, utility work and/or drainage ftdIides. Sn3 r: Shaill mean a pro1'esional land surveyor, see ek Serle: A grassland percolation arca designed to arc..eep. and treat storm runoff from impervious ares such as streets, driveways, sidewalks, parking lots, roofs, etc - Traffic Calming Devices: Physical measures included in the design of wrens tlavol that improve net z! t n;±: }.H livability lay re-dLrosing the speed and impact of vehi ular Lathe on residen,.�il ;trt.ct:s. Travel Lane. Vie inten_a l of vehicles, exclusive of shoulders and lal7L"- Ir: Trip Generation and 1!rwrril]ttt,on better LU DL).. A document, prepared by a professional civil enOr.t'°c': w[Lh experience in Traffic, design and arralysisi Lha identifies the amount of [raki,.' anticipated to and from ri development- The letter is reviewed to determine iC tracHie impact analysis is required. Traffic Impact Analysis ('TTA): A study of the potential traffic impacts. of a development on the transportation system. AtIefited-Oeeembef4049 G'impter 1 !n[rod1dion 1-15 C:fl'Y OF SPOKANE. VALLEY STREET STA N DA RDS Variance: 'Pre Iwec s -used hangs or reduce improvements itequired of a project. Warranty Period: The perio ] of time that the Applicant remainsii responsible for material and workmanship defects in the public irnpr:nenaents, which remains in effect until written notification is issued by the City_ Warranty period is a minimum of two years, Wheel Path: The three -foot wide portion of a travel lane, It salted on both sides of the travel' lane and the tNcr2-Fool wide portion from the center of the trLave1 lane, x dela ed n, ,,u...>,ei 204)9 Chotrlur 1 - lnlrtlducti[att 1-1G CITY OF SP OKANIL VAI , I , I•;1 STREET STANDARDS TILS PAGE IS 1INTENTIONALLY .LEFT BLANK Adopted December 2009 LIi pter 1 - Intradeac-tisan 1-17 CITY Y ()I• SPOKANE VAIJ i;Y STREET STANDARDS CHAPTER 2 - DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING REQUIREMENTS IE. TS Chapter Organization 2.1 1 2.2 Applicability 1 2.: Required DexlicaLiorss Lind Improvements 3 2.3,1 RcciuiR.:1icnts 2 2.3.2 Spcci Cic 1 cq iirvnrtcrtt.s for Short Subdivisions, Long Subdivisions and Binding Site Plans 3 2.3.3 Specific I ecluirerncnt, for Commercial. Building Permits 3 2.3.4 Specific Requirements fin- Miscclltinecus Projec s 5 2.3.5 ()tiler equirements 5 2,4 Modifications to Requirements 6 2.4.1 Varianc.e.,..._ 6 2.4.2 Capital Projects ,,,.♦......... ..... .... 6 2.4.3 Limiting Site Conditions......_ 6 2.5 Applicant's Responsibilities ....,..._ 7 Introduction List of 'rabies Table 2.1 Required Street Improvements for Commercial Building Permits 4 iktiewoi l)ce ber 2009 Cita jL- 2 -- Development 14igth eritrg- squire encs 2-i C;11 Y OF SIPOKANL; VA1.,1 J_iY S'I"R I.1:'J' STANDAI T)S THIS PAGE IS IN'F1?4TIALLV E,I: BLANK h : '4, 4411) Sli19 Ch tplc'T 2— t vefaprneili ii+rrFi,a• Requiremertis 2-i i C['fY OF SPOKANE VALLEY STREET STANDARDS Chaptcr2—DcvclopmcntL ccrin Reyw3 ncnts ?,-iii (:1 i'Y i )In 1'0K NE VALLEY STRUT S I'ANDA RDS 2d INTRODUCTION This chapter sets forth the specific requirements of the IJ evelopinent Engineering (Division (Division) oftlie Community Beclkpiuent Department for development projects- These requirements a.•e intended to supplement the general requirements of the Spokane Va-1-k Mtinicipal Code (SVIV C) Cchapt.er 22.130 SVMC, and are adopted pursuant to SV!vlt" 22.130.040. Required irnproveuuents and dedications shall be in compliance with all Chapters in these Street Standards.. - "1 e 1epnlcnt Engineering Guideti n" which are adopted heroin by ref rvncT 2.2 APPLICABILITY Projects reviewed and conditioned by Development Engin.ccringthc Cil' fall within three general categories: • Land divisions (short subdivisions, subdivisions and binding site plans); ▪ Commercial building permits; and, • Miscellaneous projects which include access permits, boundary line adjustments, rezones, changes of use, changes of occupancy, temporary use permits_ conditional use permits and residential projects with engineering concerns. In some insianecs, this last category of projects may not need a building permit. They may, huwcvcr, result in an increase in traffic and other impacts that inavean require street ini} roverTients and other mitigation. 2.3 REQUIR_ D DEDICATIONS AND IMPROVEMENTS This section describes the dedications and types of improvements that cnay be required pursuant to the SVMC Cchapter 22.130 SVMC, the Revised Code,a1 Washington (RCW} c-IFiapters 33.63,080, RCW :35,63.090, RCW 35A.63.:00, RCWc a ter 43.21C RCW; Rr..hajatcr 58.17 SVMC, and ItCW $2.02.020. Lend division{ and development permits trigger requiretiie ,r dedications of public right-of-way, border easements} y .. - nd oth construction. of improvements. Other project types may also lriggcr these requirements. Specific requirements shall be determined duringprojcet review To dcicrrninc the requirements kr a -project, the City considers the following: a. Existing improvements, both onsite and offsite_ such as curb, gutter, swale and sidcwak; b. Any anticipated increase to traffic that would lead or contribute to an unacceptable level of service; Adopted Duccr1T13—r 251)9 Chapter2—1levotoprncnl fnkincerini, Requiretnee s 2-1 CITY v Ol S]'04K..\NE VALLEY STREET i s i ANDAR[)S c. Connectivity of existing or future streets to better serve public and emergency vehicle mobility; d. Street classification, as shown in the. City's Comprehensive Plan; e. The City's of Smote Valley Six.6-year'Transpurtation Improvement Program and any anticipated imprevemcnts in the project vicinity; f, Puhlic safety as affected by the project (i.e. pedestrian and vehicle safety, traffic flow, etc); Bike routes, pursuant toas shown in the C:iLy's Comprehensive Plan; and; h_ h;nvirurtmenta1 impacts as identified through applicable State Fnvirnrimental Pi-otectiot Aet--(SEPA) reviews a—refa.ted to street, sidewalk, drainage improvements, or traffic impacts. 2.3.1 TYPICAL REQUIREMENTS 'Typical requirements for al l projects, except for single -#family dwellings, set -forth ma), include the following: a. Deign and construction of all now streets transportation service within a development; b- Design and construction of fronting improvements on existing slrects neeessa°'y� to provide adegL.:ate. transportation service to, or Within. a {ick civ P,r,',iT.t, as appl irabb le ? ,w. Sections 2.3.2 and 2.3.3); c. .r' cle(lu i;(; <3C,ci .. :fir 1 i ps,ce.ls. Offsite streets used to access the project shall be improved no the applicable standard. improvement shall extend from the nearest pubIic street meeting the pavement width requirements up to the project boundaries. Curb,, -and gutter, and sidewalk may not be required for the offsite improvements unless they are made necessary by the proposed development however, provisions fur stormwater management pursuant toref the Spokane .Regional &orvrivater Maxlnwrai shall he required; d. Dedications of right-of-way acid border casements for full build -out of die project's side; ()fall adjacent and interior public: streets (Chapter 7); SVM(' to provide adequate 22.130; -t e- Emergency access to all parcels of land. pctrsdtant City standards and the latest T rtrr'national Fire Code; g f'- Driveway approaches pursuant t i Chapter 7; l.Rc[u(:ation of rigid objects out of the (goat` zone more specifically se.t forth in Chapter 7; OIL. Repair and replacement of damaged curb, gutter, swales/pl,anters, sidewalk, survey monuments, etc_ (Chapter ®7); j -i. Removal of abandoned or substandard approaches and replacement with frontage improvements (Chapter 7); and Adopted r)ucemb_r 2{H14 Chaplet. 2 tkvclopment 'nKnri rirq Requdrearen0 2-2 CITY OF SPOK+kf4Ii VAI.I. +'YSTREET STANDARDS 1 Mitigationw its c! [ermined l grin a traffic impact analysis, more specifically described in (: i'it,;aicr 3. Mitigations may include cnnstruction of or contributions to traffic .t!n ing devices, traffic signals,. street lights, signing and/err pav°emen[ 2.3.2 SPECIFIC RE.QUIRW.MFATS FOR SHORT SUBDIVISIONS, I.ON(::. SUBDIVISIONS AND BIN DING t; SI'1'l', PLANS Short subdivisions, long subdivisions, and binding site plans shall provide -ror ti ng improvements along all public streets adjacent to the project 1vhLre acces!, front the project is provide=d to the stru=t. The extent of required Lmprovements shall be basal on c;.rcisling conditions, the identified impact of the project or transportation improvement, and the applicable standard. Required improvements typically include pavement widening, curb, gutter, grassy swale and sidewalk. b. All land division projects shall fully irnpr.ov°c new internal streets. e. if the existing fronting street is unimproved or will have less than 2.8 feet of pavement -with fronting improvements, the Applicant shall provide half - street improvements as defined in Section 1.13. No i car ing-Fire Lane 1.91.n Pavement" signs shall be installed tan-one-side-oftl c strcetper tlhe latest adopted international lire Code. Curb, gutter, and sidewalk are only rcquirccl on the side of the street adjacent to the project's parce[ls). Provisions for storrnwater management. are: required for the sides of the street bang improved (Chapter 7). 233 SPE( `I I+ IC RE UTI{EMENTS FOR COMMERCIAL BUTLD NG P.E.R M ITS a. Fronting improvements for building it ; .',r,.::Ii: t.rrt,inecJ 177sed on tilt -ypc of project, square footage of the projo.'i. !i.',r;° vehicle trips. These projects shall provide improvemcr'its for ibe street fronting their projects pur'suunt M _=i r, uceordance with Table 2.1. b. En the event that the street rased to access the; project is unim pled or has less than 28 feet of pavement, the Applicant shall provide fronting improvements and/or half -street improvements to meet the applicable standards regardless of the proposa[ type or size. Itt these instances, curb, gutter, and sidewalk requirements, for the side of thes[r et i rail latent to the 1-10Jject, shall be pursuant todetermined 1xised on Table. 2. [. Provisions for stcnnwater management are required for the sides of [hc street being improved.. i d ptcd I}Gr Gvnfver 2[}D4 2-3 C hxprer2 Development aiaeele lict}tra a:ncr,ds CITY 01' :SPOKANE NI': t ALLEY STREET STAN1»\ftlt; TABLE 2w1 REQUIRED S'1RKLi,+'7' IMPROVEMENTS FOR C:[IMI RCIAL 1115ILINING PERMITS PIS(),I LCT PROPOSAL COMMERCTAL BUILD=NG PERMIT'S MR l'11RCELS WTTH EX c_ i''»'. ORNEW D1UII.D1N1.i Grass Areca of Build ng (l proposed Laafclitions or new 4t1{.c{{Iron} in sq. II; ot, tip to 999 1,0'.,.11 I.. 5,9:.(9 6.171.!-)0 "0 6.ca `" 11,999 12,000+ N or!il,I;,I' 41''....%.:."1.e' Perk 1 /01.11" .1....i 1pJ 1Jer.k:I"tltfii byl'r"C,lec: 411} to 4 5 t.... q 1'1) to 15 1 G 1 [,'C1MM'I':6{CI ALBUILDING PERMIT FOR PARK I.NCr I.OI.0N1,Y(NO NEW ORE ISTINGBUILIlINO) up to 9 spaces 10 to 19 spaces 20 to 10 spLaees 411 , space.q Ki E 1111HE Il I NI PROVEMENTS Widen 1'avcmcnt ") Curti : Guticn" t�1 ri V Grass Strip or Swale Ni". Ni Si{iewalk t2;5 {'}V. \ cquisitici»kgmts and Border 1 y Easements The final pavement v, %If the sti'i k:r :.: {I"ic I_U , Lt- i 6 width, Plus 51.. a IC}w for futurc Clunk Irt5ItIIIkIIIof: 1 r I ,I''7[ , .{ 1' r. ci 7L1",f 1ti'IL.[1 r i.L=lug ,'} be added is less than 2ttwo feet, then wice11iT1g can be omi.L+.'d k Id"S tIthi '1:i rect. GTtri.s:!L3 tfil{:ties or swales ,are required akiig pavement cd i CL'tA{;illi. i..; 1},:' I,'Irrl'�:' a :`:: tl'::II:IL.1:;_ n'gzirkl1L:]s ofanoi►r11. of widening_ 2. If tt project is lQc ,tLd _r1 ¢{:1 arta <111+;'I:: i, ,l, 1 I rl.r _1icc11?cots abtrrc, the prujegt may lue required to provide curb anil='_ItL�I' :t 1 i L}:' 1➢i' ".'.. )i' I. NO( ;tigL'.1rcd _1rpact. d, '4 ' h :.0 LI itsr T a _1 I 12 2.1 ..1.' cO111111erCi it 1 bLr ..i in -L:rntiCS with exj ti ng tips new i-uildings. ilia: shall iidenLify lFi siLL. of building, mid number of peak trips_ The one triggering the improvement e171ent requiTC;llli.`ll's shall be tiscd. For example, an Applicant is prupr}sir.i an addition to .,.n existing building; the proposed addition is 3,OOO sqLra.N. Meet. The propty::Lrl taso generates 10 peak hour vehicular trips. This project shaLIwill be required to provide froutaQ.eing improvements which include pavement widening, curb and gutter installation, grass strip/s'Lle construction, and right-of-way and border easement dedication. If the required 1171provcro rItS currently exist, then the project $hall 1 be rcclK ircd to provide sidewalk. DLLeeRilPCI' 2 11:9 C'liapte.' 2 Development Engint,zring Requirenimiti 2-4 (:I I Y C}l= SL'OK,'4NC 'a .-1i_.l s.. l S-TANDARDS 2.3.4 SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS FOR MISCNEOUS PROJECTS Miscellaneous projects prelude_ access permits. boundary line adjustments., rezones, changes of u use, ;hinges of occupancy, _ temporary use pertxiir., and condi utmu] use. permits_ in some irt.st,t!lit i Iasi t__li gory of proje is may not need at buiklin , permit, They may, hc,wevt:r, result in an inc•reute in traffic and other irt:pztcLs that inaycani require street irnprovetnents andinr other mitigation, Required improvements for change of use t_nd conditional use permits arc determined based on traffic im pacts pursuant to the -WV -MC Cehapter 22.20 Sh�I Rcquirrrd improvements for boundary line adjustments, rezones, change; of occupancy, and temporary use permits are determined on a case-by-case basis during project review pursuant w - Section 2,3, 2.3.5 O'C'HER REQU 1 k 1 ". M ENTS Additional improvements may be required on a case -by -wise basis, depending on site-specific conditions, These requirements inay include, but are not limited to. the folIowl n • I1]tpro\'cI71ents previously cc/hired by the Spokane . {t[]cy (='iii' Council by old i Rance, past [and use action, or resolution; to be provided in the vicinity of the project, • 'pow streets (and accompanying dedications) as required by the Street Mosier Ilan, Local Str'i'ct lion, Sprig- vs -Subarea Poo -arid accorc]ing to the City's. Comprehensive Plan; • Participation in the City's 1'ransportaLion Improvement I'rogr tnn; ▪ Other public improvements when physical. characteristics of the property (bcluciing but not limited to topography, slope, soil type, drainage pattern or vege(awion) create potential hazards; and, • Other public improvements necessitated by the public's health, satlbly, or we] rare. _1 airi D-center2i7iW9 r_haptt .—n)r.}ulupmerrIL ipar ittitittquircincrrts 2-5 C1TY Or SPOKANE VALLEY STREET .STANDARDS 2A MODIFICATIONS TO REQUIREMENTS 2.4A iTARIAI C.H1 '1'hrs rccair-erncnts established in this churn only he waived or reduced through 2,4.22.4.1 ,. 'III+ FE I RING CONSTRUCTION Generally, all improvements .shall be constructed prior to issuing a certificate of occupancy or final platting. In certain circumstances, installation of some or all of the frontage improvements may not be appropriate at the time development occurs. 'These may include instances where. a. Required improvements iirc part of a larger project scheduled for construction in the City's Transportation improvement l'rogr-arn; o. b. Sanitary rr se i- i not available but is scheduled to came through in less than illrc,c years.. In thcsc situations, the installation of such improvements may be deferred to a later date or waived. A cleveloprnetner.s agreement may he required aced a surety, as deemed sufficient by the City prsuant ia+e0nsistIrat with Section 9.64. 2.4.32,4.2 LIMITING SITE CONOI'I'!ONS Generally, all projects shall build public ora private streets and related iniprovcrnents to the applicable standard. However, the City e rn--roam' approve a sl' nein r alienations to the requirements when full construction of the pubReiltriprOVernents d ':,-i eIsaFe not possible. loth par ia. 1s in nn R l , R2. or R3 -one, and, b. Is smaller than 2.5 reg, and, c. Will have block lengstits that do not exceed 31Ai fora through street; .J Iia I s «ai--2-66r feet of stfeet -fo n+3ge. The AF_plicant shall demonstrate that full improvement construction is not possible and propose an—alternative(s) section. The Al:plic:ant 'r; -not guaranteed to have elotibie frontage on this public street and/or the maximum -number of lots at the minimum square footage ;allowed by the SV r4C. All sarch proposals shall he approved -before the submittal of the preliminary plat application. Request after through the variance toms, 2-6 Charter 2 Development Engi E inv Require rlerits CITY OFSPUK_Ar 1•. "V:A,.1:'..: ti'ritil-:j.,T :=„NDA r0 P 2.5 'PLI ANT'S REPO SIBILITI S I]].:1ppli;t�lrt is the ]Tarty or panics desii'in 1'0 CO l..',;! ; PLIH!., 01. 1)ritr;Ce' 11F1pro %.F',]"11{ 111 within City rij t-c)T_' ay, ei:serne.._13 or approv'ak Ei11�1 PLT lints t1'C,11] the C1LV. tiiltf _t`.wiIIJLiI1!.: I tor the piL".j'cL;1. Ilc• ••\ppliezInt 115r� . he the f }v,neT .' I' 61!; s::ILI ,' i l',lr' ' cIe *:. iiiatcd b '. e wn.Cr to act i>]1 his slehair. 'T]]c Applicant is respernsi[ Iv iur ll.Le a. General project management; b. Communicating requirements and prOiect status with the Owner, if Applicant and Owner are not the same; ti Coordinating prcj ect consultants; ants; Fr ..vidcomplete submittals; .hr;°ing all required applications have been submitted to the City; I. L ashr'itig adherence to: i, "I'he standards and criteria presented in these tandards, as amended; n_ !Tearing Examiner's decision and staff report with akliniriistrative decisions, it applicab]e; and, i An conditions established hy Ci Ly. stag, &l 1)j1I L'.r rleueeli er-v0()' hp-2—]]eveLupi trent t_elglticcting Requi�'?TICnN 2-7 {:I I" r' Ol• SPOKANE VALLEY S'T.RLET KI A N f]ARFJ5 THIS PAGE IS FN]'I .NFIII\Ai_L`; LEFT BLANK Chapte. 2 — Devcinpmcni E ir+r a Requirements 2-8 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY STREET STLNDARDS CHAPTER 3 -TRAFFIC ANALYSIS ORGANIZATION? 3,1 1.\1110111(71,0S ,.,...,.,� {NAVA k I. 3.2 IRIPCaENE/IA-HO T)ISTRrrar7r()".;T.F. FE1-1{:il11.11: NNIS ....................2 3 3.3 I .r.1 ri VD Tit .1r 11(.• Ix1r.tC 1 .1.,1 _,.,.. VIM'''. 0.'1.01' 1' 2 3.4_i,iMIaae'd TM Repw't Wl,dwr"i 1!'t7 ET,Tio r.v... ....................6 a I Title Pore 9 12 Frniccr L i intion ni Sruurn,nn' . 3 } B role+rdll:r '1Dy�la7CIl all,,Lki1913CILCr SiM 3.34A Snowlauy rrl"fxiMm_,i`tu:e111011*. ... .. ... .. ... ... 7 ati iiaek7.04anlProi-crc S .7 1,11412 OlkhS A111149C5 1. 4 8 ,5:n,7mlLi.es ,3.4 9 3.5 ANA" VW.; 9 10 S,2_,;11e'thadutorrk...,. . .12 3., dfy...te ihapoaaur 13 a 5,.G,1 Tide pn.c _13 ..lw Su9111I18a1' .. . 13 . 5.4.3 I`lsIL3"' 1-flci.I i rl,*.. 13 Adoiltrcl iieeem , 1'\N, r41 PR auk,/ 3 -Drift AnOyaia CCTV OF SPOKANE VALLEY STREET STANDARDS 3.5.1 d Su..u.LlywxaUl_ksi1Ful" i; Lil0115- x 5 d5 llx�igrnnnl Pri lerr:c .................,.,.. . =5 la §n.ihxia5unnri.i .. .... J1' 41171cr R 1`'uur1icgs,. ...,.. . .},S 9 4. LyrnShce.,_%II 17F ._ 14 15 3-11 IRtI-UIlIIClilm .....,.,._- ..2;rim LETIEk 1 .2.I hpplicnbi[i y 1 2..' .0fin n.,..,, 7.1.,,.c,rrr TNKrrir1YIPA171-......................,..,r 3.3.E i !I f ri 3,3,2 pkv/Aa . ' .2.3 X11. r 1 4 J ?—lnlerwlnnimrsat-Ruercrrry-:.. T. 4 ;—pucL wnn.kind jecl -:-- :....:.::.... ....e. _.............. _ L7 r. :14 A—rim-tires. r,1'. „.J.d'IL --lerteLittiat-et ML11ILedSX..ee.1._r'_UC`r: X4: X. 261,1 CILapLcr } -Traffic. Analysis Paimatted—:1.5cfgult Raragrnrh Rat Font7 lrr4d, Cklnrk speling and granum: Foromlted: DeraulL Paragraph Early arecf $rellirg and g rarflnlar Farrnalterd: DeIaalt Paragraph Faro. G'redc 41E111tq and grammar Formatted: Default Paragraph Folk, -orlt Rid, Check spelling and yrairerhdr Formatted: Default Ririg aph Fcmk,'rcrt: Hurl, ;)rick spelling art! grammar Farrrokked: Defied Pdrdgeaplw folk, Chew4 !a;r.•lliay are! {Jran]nlar Furnretledc Desalt Paiartaph Font, area L.Jlltd and nrarnm]r Falmatted: Default Paragraph Font, 4liedr speIlleg and ;rarnmar .l Foornatted: Permit paragraph Font, Check 510E4115g and ✓ rdrluarar Farmwife& Drfaalk Purnyelp6 rami, Chea Valiiy and arl]mar 1 P ormatlred: Default Parayrapll FOOL, meek spell** arwd grarnmar Farmatled: DefaultFaragraNh Font, CTre[k siefleg and grammar FoTr ltted: l]cfiult P.nrnyrtaph Frmt Chtr:k $plies ;urd {ganunar„ . Formathed: Default Pardyra4th Font, Oreik SpeIlldcj erld grammar Formh46ed. Der3ult Paragraph Font, Qhe[k.spe1leg and gra4nmar 1 err Formatted: Default Paragraph, Fant, +-check spellrg and u : arnnrer Fornlntted! I]Cc]Llt 1'araynph Font. C icck apcilrg and f. t y<drr liar �I� f FormaH.ed: DadLi Perdyrdl>h rack, €rer:k and a•amrnar Funmakled FormaRoi FormatI d formatted Formatted F01 crotted Formatted Formatted , Formatted /1 FurmaLI d FormmlhxJ FortnaHoi fronrrlal:dl T.; ITY OF .51-1)K A NE wi .1 .1.: 'V STE I:•:P.T STA NDARDS 11241IS PACE IS lYii:VriALLY LEFT. BLANK Aatai.goit wifibei 14)....);; XX. 'MX Ckapter 3 —Tiagic Amaly3i2 CM" OF SPOKANE VALLEY STREET STANDARDS 3.1 INTRODUCTION 'This chatp.Lcr desrrihes the G11111.efkl_q. Or the trip getleraticsn fyrtri istributit n -tetter and traffic impact analysis (11A) submittals. 'iiic TIA is n cornprcfiensivc rcpoort containing n11 of the technical information land c nasySis nCCL=s;LLry t{r Cvialir,ilc ;a propt,s(4l AL %V dAntiiornncril i!r reckvc;Itspmcnl prnjccl i TrI TIipIianve wtiilkt-ies d+t All projects cxccpr those exempt pursuurc JCI forth in the City or Spawn; Valley \1unCcs{le (SVM.), Title 22-20-020 rh;ill hrd subject to InnislrlH-1:,ki+m conga.' menu) n'4 i._4\. T ha4 Mk' ie;r: i txltiuutcd P.,! ensure that ade.ouate transo station Favi ides are pn s.itleJ lit ionic cti n !vi:iY neNV rowtith. transportation concurrCn v shall be racasuNil rasing t e.. cc ccpl of I;.vci of Scrs. igc• { I CJS). AccxpLuhlc LOS Lhrc4hl61;Is sur delrret.l in the ,SpdLk Ing Valleix f'tnnprs±hcls'iac flan. l"Ira, Il6ruchart tura' be used to determine what stpc of transportation concrlrrcney dochi[ncniis regLLLLcd. x11.. City nal sign IT [m a prLajecl unlit IrHnKrllrlutiLU1 CCf1C&IIm-Tic%yhaas1:L rti.ilL-tow(Wind. MaLltirterhe Trip c>7tartriraltan a 121EIrlbullrxt Lollar Required to all ptoitars that penCMk IT/121e i1hrn 1Q pithour grip{ Mens"bCOw 71 Limited Tt116 !Required for qualified proects within a. }EPA IulJI Krems 1I446 ejeiyr.alr, matte 111e0 7n lost hour trips Ai an Arterial' to e.11eillur, 0.4 ,.Rx.z.. a.r TIA Plaqulred for all quellRed p+ojeria Not do Rol qualify far nf,Q'n1lydTo. aqui !hat ararraiemorer KNOT Al peak fpur swaps, x an et[rar9rl n64er!' 411001F In.•-rv.I Adupiert tla.,, ru6,r 2{10.0,MNN, «.l' iy, Chapter 3— Traffic Annlysk 3-L CITY OF ST'rwi1NE VALLEY STREET STANDARDS Ile Lable bola w summarizes tltc DizinIaLciry s.ccirie etuincntti, for cath type rri lltLab'SiS rCgS3iT S�-bx'..SC?E+. IS�_4'o-rl Int T�bld 1_— Lt Srvu€1t e -nee ing Seal I -!e Pmt: 9 PrOreCt DCScriptiol' Jnd jiimri SY of Traffic Anal sis Sca . e Elements '7C, ilrn nt and Trip GenpratLon ,riarr df Existing Conditions "..ackeround projects and growth rate S udy Area lntersecborIS of COliEetOrS Or ha' slier 11(1tij1Zf ..+}.7C!? hitersECllarls ofC gljt f?�iraher wrtnrn n-0 AC IY'iS<s Safety An7rlyses Other Analyses (Overntd, as. Sight Ohstangg. ),yin [pew Worrants. Analysis Scenario's (Peak Hours def irred jp Sir ioj Existing C andiliarlS Erol-twt ,caitr� ,lam tkitrd pt year wrtt nrOepct nviid r ,' +5 years wrrhrurt armee!, 3+99-01.1' 5years with cr,r=_'rL s o,vrrcirncda!irl,—rcyOrlc: ,„p7Cii'7.�,N;e.57.alikn+ Fir;l;r.c._ — A.pp:.rid ce ! C Meetine5. Trip eneration L7 Limited TTA TIA x X 3.2 'TIT' CENTERATION & DISTRIRUT 1INN LETTER GUIDELINES rill projccis veiri ch generate I Q ur mtnC new Beak -hour vehicular trips shall submit a trip gentry tion and distribution letter- The letter shall be bused on the current. y;r:aion aeC th histi:utc of TrainsportIi ion r gintem (ITC;) Trip CrE'FiNn ti0.17 rNartrral and developed by Fin Engirleer- Ifa prajei L subject to SL :e Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) review. lht lip gunero-,lion and distribution letter shall lx submitted For review xL the Lime OC L}Lc SF,PA application. The letter is required lo bt approved by the City prior to subrrrittal of a traffic impact Tina Lysis report.. Ali optcd:. .te rry: r wt;\t:\. '0IR C'JLtpLCL 3—'1'LaI Analysis 3-2 CITY GF SPOKkNE VALLEY STIP I {L 1 .1.0.1JI 1A RIJS 3"2,1 APPI.IC:AB!Ll'1']' A trip generati{I l and distribution letter is required for Mast projects, 1-Tuwevcr, the following projects arc typically t.ntlu She peak -hour threshold and may not be required to prepare lL Irii 4enrraLion rind distribution letter: Residential short plats,: 1 the r unlbei' of milks from III tFu:picL sh III he equiLal=Iii tt:Ic++'L7sinalc t':Irtil homcsl; Li. !.drive-t["rul'"h L:'I;'fieri t'1; ads with rl.ii irrJL1c r seating; 71 `wtlllli-Irrlrll! 5' 1:1' 91e�tr: L+'L'll nine (4f -units of 1cSs; nt. use from residential to commercial With LLL? new nuildings a . i; f i co 1i' lri ects of less t]iaL12,,5(W) sgrtaie. feetf KITE land uses .'11.1-11-799).; ;ni•:L L::dtistriil project:; or 1es-i than 9,0O SyiLure feet {ITE land I.P.c:s I DO - 199). h. Fur lrrxliecis ex:,c °_. d to gencrF.tc Icss than I0. peak -hour vehicular trips the pinjcc appI.:+el 15 ':gI,i1c,I a;l.111rrait a lever with the following information rot. ;: 1 L L: I le', el, r, I IC I I L phase: for the property, i. I34'i l 171'7.�LC" dc:icription; ii.'-Lrlbci of expected eirnployces; 91iHOLLr; :I_Iv_4irLe4S; urnrl, 'I IL. :\i.cci':d 1'r.i„liticr or w�`.i-ii:lllrlr I1j,.s I�Ilill:l r!.%:� :_rid clitoloyee3] to tltc !?I."kl l :tiff fi111 7.4! I1K t1`V.' ;:IILI rl 1 rw,LL 3,7.E eU l)'1r.-Arr,1.r1Tr: Tw til•_ L:ill laracion and disuriLai t on ]iclker fprprojectti erieraLlity, Ill or More peak - hour Lips slipi!I irb:1tI:.l hr l,sl`1P. iTI elertpeuts1 L. PrIrjecl1.le:-o-ripLKI_i,including proposed use; t1. Site plan with vicinity map;. c. Building arc fis}led in square tee,: 41. 7aanitn. in the property; -. !el IIL".Ls lllrarL ul wIwi',iJ'per k in ei SFPA, In [Tit Are,:L L.titii :ohm.%ill+ :iCCt^4,j�; i Prrapte.ed and existing access points, site circulation, queuiii lengths It drik,e,A vs (and drii^e-1hrrrug lti, il'uppticable1 and liaiking locations; g.,Projed phasing entl expected build out year; i iLArl e timate. tr[ trip generation for the 1y^pica] we kch iy, AM peak -hour: and I'M peak -hour conditions. Suppnrtint; uo-aleu,laLioros and data sources shall Adoplul 1:lcgem4)er2A097§6;-1'h. 7nIR {'Iri_ilcr (211Y CV SPOItANt` vAl I P:Y 231$0.:1]1, rhi\h}AitlaS. A II J.ljuLiIftr t ror [Tonsil u.se, mixed use internalization. pass - by trips, a.K../or d ivc rod trips shall be clearly statodi A ulyrnparn c11- (11C !rip .y.crienition Fpelvoterli the, prey iinIS and the nroposed ecL::.n,I a change of use, If dic. comparison shows a net iltete.5e in trip gcr...cAtice. the projcc Iiiwil4 bc subject io thc TtA of a 1. prelimillit-y for traffic on the adjacent street network, shcAvn in a _...11.1phical fo.....mat; and, Thc! sLII daLet! hy die Pengineer who prepared the Adoptcdbmsbar!"-Pwc.,0;kA churer 3 - Tralec Anzari% 3 - 4 CITY Or SPOKANE VALLEY STKL?ls'r STP ffllnl lx5 2.3 LIMITED TRAFFIC: IMPACT ANALYSIS Purwarlr ur 4\' (.' 21 .211.440. J)rsrtialttss ai['Spokane ballet I.ad additi! mat ea%ironmenral review perferlaed a5 Pan of the C;13o11Preheas Ye YI i.n hi i, lie cans:: at tIs ;. #x�s�itisantt� .mic111n1eT1tal review xi, ir lire the SF1}A Tn1i11 Are,iti.lulu ni orilt of Llei clopirierr.pIrijecis within ttrrxt' Utah ib' IRA require a tail ! IA lemic if the Applicant adopts. the subarea environmental anat'sls and mitigation requirements identified in the S1r1',-1 documents. Hoyvcver, to ltisa,`y _Tle}ternialtraff c s.ireiv or sile access isyuc . is limileil TTA i:; rcoI,Lirutl ;:i set lirrITL ht'1rsx. 3.t .- FP!.M .. DIT.ITI ii11 ' sl k 1c1L 15 1 �111ircd !vr the f.4llr)nir4p{ 5ilsetdions: Projects ucldire 21) IM all Fre peal. -Moue trip tIin1ii*14 err arterial intersection arid which are located within a I k A Intl it Area: it'. Pro c s within +r S`.PA Iiiii11 Area nun iniinset focal au{xs inter-.esti{ons. #rtleys,ire(id ye1L 1).i 1{141alted 4kithinlrrrarrl=u %Vial a current trunk problem as ideLLLJL1ed b: the City or previous traffic study. such as a high -accident beat.p,.Rootr ;tt tgig.17111 itLDUILCU'€11h_0 c,•;err e. rk1 the discretion of theC'it\ icL lieu of full. l-Er1. A full 131 ( ,tit Se don v. is required for land uses that exceed the dotal trig bank established in SVVC 21,2111.f140. Apprlitarr„ts are encinIT,Lpccl tlr c{oiisult ibilFL C"rtx' II r. e+ IT uii,ure If tlie,r apply for both SL.PA relief and, a limited FLA. I.hezoite oL k1J a,itcd Tlr hall he tk- eh#ped by ion env inrrr. A iirull sciipe skt.hll he reviewed and appnlxcd hm titc ('ie,x prior to subirii si1trs nolle Iirl1itdd TIA. lite scope oldie limited 1 A shall. coaleaim to the ibl1.130++j112.: The study area n1n •include miv intersections or JLn_cty ski:hin 11 1/2 utile radius airtht site. b. A safety analysis maw be r gijrcd, as identified by City staff in the 5c c.q. Egvic_xl_rhase- if the mbr#Iy4i4 i; required, Ile City shark 111.1,iN1 by rn1virliri+ crash dsttro iputvbellrhEe. Safei4 unulrsis at a rniiiilium requires three vearx tsf crash history showing, the date and time. tvpe,. number of vehicles involved iiLtiKsgabijhetiiding s ,llht:r and road conditions. Crrnh son st.siti rhi11 inclslLle i,icx le and pedestrian crashes. Crash information r.li :ll 1,t' a ss.essed l,u LEte develorrer-s elraineer to identity possible impacts the prop-scd nvxy trips trr_O Ij , a .:l t est+?tl .tn,..F to plc nal€ysins%111dss1t .lait�sl r4c4 yttrr#ioc p ic4o. lerfp;ti r Lir Ihai rstereds tat rbpxsirrini inaes ectirorr . rt'curriTiLL It'll tuns orad es. Limited si; 1u distance. or proposed proiect access intcfscct`toins that may be poorly placed. IF LI. serol,% and operallirmrrd analysis. Lii reveals; {elicirncies. ten raitir;rrti{m enclosures stt:171 f developed with recommendations to fix the deficiencies. ,Annterl Awrialp F2a7GW1 '\. ry0p1S [lumber3 ..'ITaltic /windy 3-5 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY STREET STANDARDS d, ! nicss otheuvtsc i icnkrttk' .,li°_ 1LcwC i1}, ih analysis shall to pcTfcratjsl fQr Lhe or the Pn]pal WLE fie veli 51 -nuc 1. 3.3.3 rillf1-110DOLO[i1 The uaulx=tiis shall h. done uxinT the 11II10x6r4'4 ITLCL101.1.1.4i1 ax'm a. Background ,2rovTh rate lbe background eroyals rate nrae be based on historical gL'nyxtJs1 t Ls�rths:. !xh..r tc_�s. ulttl <i ft iu..i1Ligures a!') a ,l the C srraprihen.ive Plan fl4ie 2f1in and 204C) avew' traffic :dwnes). A tnini7sr-4t annual ri1\31h rate of ]" is reg aired tunes; t;LELei ise h. The LOS shnl1 be deicmnincil 1n aeucrnaurice with Line methotI' replurietI in the current i%^rill}II Ofthe JYr h iiia= C=ry r rc 16. Maimed 11C-.ifx: c Use of the twa-stagc gap accc_pfancc methodology for unsIgnalized ltllcs tiSTr�: ik svhiect to City approval- d. ". ytic'frri" Li the priniam traffic colisk'are axed by the Citw' to model intersection and turn pocket queuing analysis. Delpending. on the analysis, t.c ct il}}ly rx=gaaest ether tr{lflic 41r4t11;'tiis aatiin other 1111)(14::1 12, tsftxaare- In udatiLiam [[L 5V adiFir- the. ett aired' max' use the 111t1s\i current. 4e, 1oJs [a1 1I[gliw'ay' Ce.paacity Sath varc Lfi(S . tither analysis tools mav be utilized wig' City approveI FECM methodtllc]gv anncll rierurately rarxkcl un intertiecLii! e. Frio generation da'tpashall heLased o1] the latest version of tat, rf.4. Ciowgzifim J11 ii- urjTJ, Trip Etii, 'TJiti 7 L 11}] F1 ti 7 " n '1 1 1 Fri "11 Lii':•S may he sub.sIiluleiI %%ill! prior C:itr dptllnn r1l: urELL. t'. Fearnini movement counts and crust diagrams ma' need to he dcurto2cd to si intenUt5d.c.i3Lorupearitmsprclbterra, tfIrefriemints arcra:gll.cl lh.x' shall he tJike.L air] u Tuesday. Wednesday. ur Thursday r ,rescr.Linu a Lw pkat tra4'et day. [Taunts shall not Le taken during a ,,geek calash contains a holiday' ae 5itring.zr'cell cif a 3iyni:lc.9neth r eYenl. F!TPIPLIK lith, w rls n i nv he required to wit l'=s L Lurni nt, MO VelTInii. Counts duria5! a L4 pic:ai sc.ELoul daw 3.3.4 EMITTED 111 RE PORT NIINIi111I Ft1 ELEMENTS This lirnitcd TEA rerorL shall include HI. ler]sI 111e 161151Y 33,4,1 Til le Pie 1 k jjrpOrkijA.A.all include a title p ,.' wxilh the fol [owing eieTricats; H- NHann.44fpntjeet; h. C itx pr alert Liiittibe . ermit number: A Pritka .5_kl?ltti17. -add adds,'Zi d. C nei 4t et'w [tame. address ai td phone tai u.ber: Akipini1J....a.L:.-r 11.19Kti,\x..:4,0 Chapter 3—'m'a'le Anelp's 3-fi fxr Y OE SPOKANE VtLLLLY STREET STANDARDS e. Dateu 1.s11.111N prepairatipi and, f. 2.nginceri RE seat., sigicil aDdcd.try the.pEptessionkchaincer licerriod Wushinvon wh1i ErupFin2c1 fli nzporl. 33.4.2 Project DC5Crin1bn awl Summon' the Limited `1."1A shall juctock a hi-lef description of project, local]] )11. Sal& arKE 33.43 ProrkoseEl TI-cvdtiiirnent and Trip Gen 1 he ihnitcd_ TIA shall include ;.11..: f0110Wille inforniatina for dEn'CluiprauL PiijLL deSerintibit. iuJiidii osecl use: L Riiihhn riieiF in siruow1"4.0'.. d. Zoni1n4 of the properiv: c. Dem-rninution of whether the project is within a ,ShA ir1flU ken c:seciiIiri ci in): E 11.rurmd and e.,..kling access points. she circulation. kinenin icibs for ki Land ,ITivc-througlis, if „apidicabtd_priA park Pict phasing and eweeied oneniria s.ear J.. Airistiniatc of trip ,erieration for the ti,pical weekslay„..,)Kpealc. hour. iLnd PT.t rmik-lunn anti d ata siource...; sl tall be sham'. An., Liar transit tme. ndxed IPsc....11:031gti4ztti.pn. pass -by trip5. anclior diverted u keirty stiiktf.); 1. A ciiIE urthe trio Leueration betv,een the previc141:-; andi the proposed site use for _krojects tnvolvipg a change of use, If convarison .shit.ovsi nci inerviiseiiiLc:T.14.0,1110i ,..iubjeldiki the limited TI A requi rernenbirDe* dtvet(cramiLl t. A nrieliminaff distributioa Daum for traffic on the adjacent street DELL3si.,k, shown iiiu Lrraphi cal 1r-nit: k.. Proje•ut rdlusin um! tithisaf4,. Siuii.uar k.lExistlit“'undition_N TheTh Iritd TTA shall provide a brief' summary OF V.:Lsiirl/ C(Incliiir.m5 For the Autiv area drat includes di I eam the a. 13rk.' iirnni.iof the ,truns poll at ion netwoit.adj ace pi_ta the she description of ihe s(1 preseinx ofbikt laties!trails_ bus !41.1.43. and. 4111-NIMCL !lurid Arbalori Peffalb.2.03930;x7.c ?Ulf!. Chmirez "Tmffr Applysi$ 3 -/ CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY S't'ILFIi I' .S i f.MiARbS fl ILrC, 21.1" 1s1h1e atf the, peal: }HRH LiirriiI]1 ntove.iie*nt volumes at the ...Intl). intersections; oll sion.hisstrr -- Il7r, v ars minimum: T.c'n'.Ih, ail e isti,r.s Lim pockets al snud4' intersections.. ars'i_ e. ()Litre isntbrmatioi.t as identified during likcjpgang pr-c:4s- 3.3.4,5 Backaraund Proieel's If back ruii,erl project trallic is necessar\ to assess build -out conditieins, it shall include Lite inliowiit2_ a. ,_ I ra+llic frern ri vlx' coast -nom! projects: h, PrarjucLi for .which. traffic impacts liak'e been tentatively rc.!cfyvt; f rulectc for which a Concun-encv C'crtificatc h � a;+Hrdlcct: d. Non-prQ.ivet, general; backs anti IrriFrle incrcutici: and. e. Vesttd traffic for vacant that arc undergoing redevelopment. LJhc limited TI,A ti}tll_rp) isle the information for lE ckaround prajcct,_ ate identitsed by i!fr a. t`naiect desvr'tpCi - c:. Trip, ceneraLed bw proieets and assigned to study interection... d. Fsaruc or Iabic of the build -out pri.d hoot movement voluEnea at the study intersect"' MS: e. Planned transportation improvements (private €kcvc)opra .tit _ti ntj City'': and, \4heet re41617241. Safrlt arltt DperalilFns analysis results. 3.3.4.6 Qghrr Analvse.% Other analyses max' b- t;equirkxL t itcstcd Im the iiy. irrcluahal nut hUJEC.!,C1 a_ 1..)Gi2_is [eiladts at drivcways and Brite-thro1.I2h xaindov;i b. hoi.e: g, Air quality (tvpivally required when phioical. improvements arc prtrfxittied and requites electronic submittal of5wri.hitpL,.frlc-51,, d. luterscetion (Fi ivi I. rounc1t,hniits_ J idur-wa y top vicicll; e. Au.\itiarw lane warrant analy ia, art; ui uid ftrlcluding velkieleiiE3ncl IF bicycles": ,$JkipltdPN CFaptrr3—'Irafiii Aielyla5 3 -IL CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY STREET STANDARDS g. Sitc access:, and, It. Prrtr-1 ian ;ttCeN study. 3.3.41.7 if'irldinv Mc foljp.3ilng,51141 be aid 1T sscd in tkw f inding4 s Linn � a. Till fliuLind reiviirlpauL: b. Proposed project modifications., anti t2ff-iit rnitr adicma Appeni;Iiv The tbtlawini intarmation shall be included in ppcndiccs: h_ Trily� rte6urlimil cmarCeA C, tray r -L}' and oriein•dLstinatian s:udiv= fir a ppIica is 1`Ni9.iinn and lurn irb n1 .vonnl e. Ail aCvsissoftware fSy'ifcbro_ [JCS, Siirilrailk, etc. Mreort printouts. [electno��i .„su,l inistal nraa UC t quiscd): iirran1. aria xis casttail;slialr1 : and, 12. References_ Married '_ W )X: V. XN, 3U I K Cleaptcr 3 — TTBJGt AiRlySes 3-% CITY OF Sr'C]KANF VA1,T.FY STIdr•:Fr STANDARDS 3.4 TRAFFiC IMPACT ANALYSIS -€F479 Tcr i:leipnaenLS Lhal jr= niil s. illrin a SERA Ttii1IV Areik. this section outlines the reCluiret[lenti fisc a flh_ 'Ere intern of the € IA is to idiom; Lhe City to prop ,rly anL'i[tt1. inipmve the Lransgo1l;agIop s stirrup ]ssl ksllatsili; r ids n fulur� grutialh anal Lir comply sxilh SFPA pxtlLrir4rraenkti.. 3_4.i APPLICABILITY A TIA is requirr d Jrathe following situations: u. Projects adding 20 or more peak -hour trips to an intersection of arterial streets, es defined in Chapter .l of the City's Conlprehcn2ivc P1n . within a ono-nviic radius of the projeel site ars shown by the Trip generxtiam se HI clisirihutinn 1e[icr; Or, b. Projects impacting local access iotcrsect1OLts, alleys, or driveways located within an arca viith aw current traffic problem tis ideniifed by thr City or previowi tr:.11Ti stuLly, sucbl as ax high -accident location, poor roadway alignment o: capacity deficiency. 32,43.4.2 SCOPE The scope of the 1 A };ball he developed by an 13 pales;ioria]-.engineeL- €ieereied irk-khe-+Sicite-rif-Washingtent. Prior to submittal of the '11A, the City Fuld other impacted jurisdictions/agencies shrill approve the scope of fbc TTA. The scupul- [hc TiA shall ctmiiirrn to the fealluwving: a '[be study area shall include any intersections of arterial streets within a one - mile radius of the site that would experience an inerca.&Lc: of in lerea 20 Vehicle Lripfa during a peak hour. Some. intersections !nay he excluded if analyzed within the past year and are shown to operate at LOS C better. Ali site access points shall be thief}zed, Additional tlricrial into-ryectwim ou1Si1:lc Or Ihr one mile radius aril interriedions 1Frlroi:al streeL1 may also be required at the discretion of the City; b. Karl of the study intersections are on a !Oilier Arterial C'otridor. a 44?rti6lrir LOS a l.nalys:s5hA 1. }fig colulLFcted fi or all nelcs ant a rrri dors. Tarr rxeaniple. 1r LJ project irtureaia 1aail i. ir+ 20 wehlcle. at the intersection of Pines ltoadflklission A4inue. then a corridor LOS analysis shall b teetrirecl For lines ['toad, Et a cord dQrlla heotilfralyz&q.ilulthin the last two years and is 4l�er�wn Ruh or'traLle aR 1 OS C airh t c, Ilse exranpl the t'urritlur 6 -OS unalvsis_ ailflteiuit trallie counts on the corridor mai skill be rcatrircd !fl order to ntainlailriiuv2-Ct -cletW database ofmints ai o the :'Najur.4rieriari arrid rrs, clu3k i4 al' Ii of the Mir Arterial' Corridor, frame the C'om.prekreniN e Marl: ArgoL1.nc:MLr4Ian Re,tura bkt+'�'c^- [t_TL4r11_-SYCI KAELf Applekm fClvd Adopted 13eaend,er!7e4k\ YxOL7la C:l aapte L 3 - Train ALml ys h 3- lar Farirreitcrt: kiullebzat 1 LENC1; 1 .1 rslljInci:l: 1.77.+ -fah ally F'+al.: 2' l.'Jfl 0t.. SPOKANE VALLEY STREET STANDARDS ■ !'[nes Road bemeeas TrentAvenueand SLii Avenue • f vciij —i n R,yiul FretvWcn h diaina Av'cmu' and 8III Ayrerni ■ Sul lioad between Welle;]ev / Venue 41.11A1 R[]1 Avenue t ue At nit � ppl way Blvd bclw.cn Fanchcr Koaid and Palrk. Rtt:w 13c.A PM peak hour LOS analysis shall be conducted for all study arca inntersectitm—dand ctinidi,rs iLopplicjbJ An 1.QS if lhn AM freak hour: Saturday afternoon: or other time period may he required at LIie discretion of the Cityi it !AY ily:.liafrin.lhw.5coT ; reit pIoi i . s 5alt4!ty aan.nl,si$ m,ay he required_ tV1iith HMV include inLersectEoES d�u uiI1Lam. Luril lane ir inL+and LU4_ sia]at disiarlce_ and ueclestria,rrhica.r:le confliL:is tri identify iraleEILiai t-�_ Addi6iaiaal analysis inay be required by rather reviewing agencies. the lnicif,ection aid corridor if aooliti:thlel LOS shall meet of exceed the Jhresholtla p4rrsaFtjr twin the City's of Spo].ianc Volley Comprehensive Plan Chapter 4= {_aplLal Facilities, Table 4.3 Spokane Va11Gy level of Service Standards, lnatL�. }srI!1htt 1.11E110E1.ia.n ram.hc„Prvii;ct appljpActigglizaijeA. IhL' Cryit% L 1 i'ilentirr it[Nproprl:itt lnftl'hy'IYLlirrt memsd1res, 'hii h L:fJadd inc1llde modification of die urzersecuoai designs. constructing/funding ',improvements to (; ity-utile[ d inl;:rs.e tis}ns, err ebanging the scab. of the deve[oprncnh A i.aletv he rtquiretl. a.i identified fax Cil) ;Calf in 'he 4Lope review ukase. 1.1 the araaltvis is required_ the Lit., shall assist b.. providing crash data if as i i JJc.._ 5afgytnal}mis gat. a pusnirourn xcslstiri~s thrcc ycars of ei,t it lhisjQry' Nhantirte Iht Cline am:1 lime_ lyra. n,Enrhtr,rrvchit:lt i in yob...elI in the uE lsh, vt tuber alai road coud[tioals_ C'rasii aiLaIVSiS shall ittc]ude bit.vc[e and. pedestrian era.;lres_ Crash infotaurtiayj , �II Lx ; s � ?Y c d neii7ticr Lo identify pigs iike i'n,dr,tcls prarroMctl r,eix trip!, wcitilt# irdt[ Io i ie rrnhlcln. vimplus.rnii inchidc t1UCui,in that exceed sLcrrage pt wise( lengths Or that extends 1.0 upstream intersections. rccurringl'ft turn crashes_ liniited sight distance or proposed project :acces.s inlcricutions Ihtsr nut} 1-i DL 1Iv r#tt4ci1 SElfety i;'iiics i hia1l ESC nli:ti;iFrrd to ale sail [a{Li;Mtt OrL [LY stall: 3.4.3 11 THODI[)LOGY The atnnTysiy haul ti d&ne using ihe following rncihrxlolugy; _Background growth rale historical growth data (SRTC) Reg nal Trrrv, i Dcrrrtlrrd,1fodre, Chir ?s�.11t rat.Q,as approved by the 4°iry_ This rate k he applied to e-atistiI1 turning- inriveo-rlent wtrlirEiieN alcuLaied lieu 1-igure.s 30 and 1.r_1tnciiR phhcstsildfi__1itrailr.201 AM alQ.A .rIgc_ .aily,uuaffic 'The E ack t9rintad growth. rate may be paned A/L pied Deeemrrer3Of i XX, .111 N. Chapter '4 Trrd%c Annly3a 3 -rt CITY OF SPOKANE VAI_L.[iYSTREET STANDARDS aitc gencrat:sl traffic ro1wT1ec- l i..A risirrinra3 Illlxuilgrowth rate of 1°� nt is required. Under no circumstances shall. the growilt rate be un otheraljuipprovett hx. 111 City, t3. 'file LOS shall be determined in accordance with the methods reported in the current Mer3 i kart edittenof the Highway Cavity Mantra (JCA iyr a : 111riher d1 fined b]-Cit}_stsif: Corridor LOS shall be determined 111 inlralaLirrc Lite 1fr1wne-'.Mei.gliLed averagC intersection LOS of all s'igttalized altcrialiartcria] intersections along the defined I - h & the tdajor_LArirlial Corrielor.1 With U intersection LOS the corridcor_ the conic of rle1<n' rrf MI iratel'secLki]S shall be axeragcc. calculate total corridor LOS. fie same t117.C.0.110)45_,dalilce 017iialivid.4gA ai cetigt . httJ l bw. u5Vd tv assign cord. I 1.OS Ic. ., corridor oven' v: control (Jelly 11'1 cloak! co:ire-41 ,nd in E. OS Di.. [3a,sed c a City input WSDO f rLIMO L2:"IIIiII�I incciscetigl Ir„Ir. or inay not be included as _part elf the cr.n.i,lcr L'}I]�L.i4l iian.. }tiril I11:1x be evaluated. 4eptiriilel, rui i n. 1 lx'1(ion] rratLI';c:.. Iii}n w. d_Use of the two-stage gap acceptance ntethodo]o_I;y for iws:grralized intersections is subject toredurres prior City approval; the Prinanry Irs(ffi1 sola„'are ti5e11 b3 the City in model il:ierse.Lion:e in: ill Lull l pocket ilueuir.g ilii irl x"=iS_ Derrertiiierg on. the aYla.14'�LS. tI1 . City ii i. rtilxucst other traffic analxsis using other modeling. software. In alaiditioel ice $vna_hro, the Engineer mt>x itie the most current Srl3i(?T1 f ICS. Other analysis tools may Ise utilized with prior City approva if [1C[ 1 methodology cannot accurately model an intersection; 13LTrip generation data shall bre laascc[ iyn the DoE.47.11144e4 vcrsiaaata(-1-4iepR of the ITE Trip GEIRETidifjei 11 21.17u Ji_ I Yip generation data from studies rfsin) ilar facilities may be substituted as approved by the City; and, g„Tttrning mow:moil it cuunls shall he rcecsrcli'd Tess than or year pricer ki submitting a traffic study_ C.oimiei Fess than two yeah old irlay he used it no significant cevelopment projects or changes to the transportation network hHvc (recurred. -Counts buirlcf3.ial. be taken on e Ttrc;iday, WC(]ncSdny, a1r Tlrurfidny repregelnti rig a LypiCaT lretvel clay_ -Counts eliott44shalli not tm taken during a week which contains a holiday, or divine a ti,eel: Or a siers]tieant .x ate cr_cvant, P' ojccfs neat- schools may be required to collect turning movement aoutils Lturir.g, than. typical l:Chorll day. Given the pttlerltil111x lame -scale itif corridor LOS r . aluatioi t, cs,urrrs older than rose yeah- I ILa ti•. be used for intersections along a con.i dor that are more than one mile away. so lon.g_a1.1htcy.ar Each rd using_ lite 7Tv *11>Lretc_islcntifiSNIAL r:_.H125RS}.Sr, the City mlt5 rerlt±esl_ al it: discretion_ that the Ilnijeci ctslsecL naz'. an.flic 1 i !l.5lir..tJ 5'i=) AlitiLlbRAdjtarArrcfiat Powder ale I.oi pari of LYs crlrri4{ir I.11,Neiiie'il;rhunAnrxhIe% a3,e ntH 11 LL9 Ii 111 L"I, 1Vdrkrtrrl F ;,iipohi!s]{IfA75.7:'C 'T5I R ['hpptrr TTaFic Amnlvx'i' 'i-12 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY STREET STP HOARDS 4 gult35�vitati' tnl rcC?aiorl Blond ¢1 re1,0"k1111 Mujiir Arterial ('rarriikor iu X11 e.rriEii Ira rnrr niain,t re lalis eIv CurrcriI. thiLabase for ILA review. .FIA 1U I'Ol&"I' MINIMITM ELEMENTS The TGA report sha. I include at Irur.i the followi; 3r15, 13.4.4_1 `title 1'nge The TNA ihall include a title page with the following elements_ a. Name ofproject; b. City project mirnbcrtperm t n umber; c, App.icamL's t1inroe and address; el. Engineer's name, address and phone numb.[, c. Ila€c of' study prcparcakiain; and, r. The vrigineering seal, signed and. dated LW the pmfess-ionah-engineer lteees._a:...l._Stit _fWeia ingcrnwhopirparodIhererot. .3.2.f....43.-1.-1.2 Introduction and Srimmatry a. Purr ni.ie lir report a cul study oksjec Ives; b. Executive summary; p, Prop (.1t l develirprnent tlescrikaEion; cL 1 :Ita lrrii and study area; e. Findings; and. f. Recommendations and rtaitogatikn. 3.3.5 3 4.1 Frr�p�nc�tl I'1eveiistime.L The IIA shall include the following[ information roc the [imposed develvpmenLL Plhi; i.; the sarrrc tragi is re0Lured for dsc [civ lei Lei.). a. Project drzcnpkion; h. I.raualion and vicirruy map; c. Site plan with Lnii6ding size (square feet); d. Profused r,pnin e. Land. use. f. Access points, site circulation, guc ing 6tacr.-ions; Irmgihy, arnai parking Adula,xltr e,b_r'MswJ2 k1% _C1B Chnpter3- Analysis 3-1.1 I I `i' RTi F.rr STANDARDS g. : 11 CS:iLi;a=C. of t!.: gc_ iaL]J-: for tlic. Lv'p-c.F t3';c dr'. AM pcalk- I]cIF. rnri i'i4.{'. r„ Is ,i1r t:in[ii inn;. Irl ricijii;"n.:r i4 i„r Irrn]s.' 17;.I :,- ! tlri r di 4trL.d t] it :: li_11 lar .:':e;iri}'si�tNd; Fl. :'4 dl5tL3lurion pL ic,1: C‘31. ?rr.ffie on the adtaccr1t slrc F Tclwtnk, ti17J,.'11 II' H c,.r1phirxi1 Fe.I'M :u; ;and, i- Projvc..Hiz.siiip,P.rid ti iiiirg. 3. Sri3,-I.-I Sinn HI ry of Existing Conditions The TIA xhrll pr,!. iIIL a 51.11TlT 1riry irexiyLing opnciitic]ns for Llhr r truly- mrta lhaL ine;ludei tFir following: a '1'raa3sportation ncty ork descripticul, including functional clas:ificalion, biketpc^fl.;slrian fac iIi1ii s .and Lrrar]sil runt y; h, F' is:inF. zoning: c. Ixis'irlg traffic volumes including percent heavy vehicles: d° 4-e iEli ril ,I Ii: iuli hisiury v vcsar minimterri; C. P71NLIttl Speed li.rtliL a'kTld il- known the 85 lreLcenti;e s�+ered determined from a speed study);. f. Lcngth of cmisting f rim po kcly' al sigi-i I fwcl inicryctLia]ns; end, R- Loc tion of -the following: i, On -street parking, 31. IP+ij;4' r;LC] i r171i Private and public schools in the area, et 4 t Jfe itttl p cuL.t , rm I,a�alLl3.4i_4- rL5CMl1u- .idarned rarermIeer 20Q9X "ti "S`_G 111 L'Imp]ci 3—'rLllt�14'U A,uc7}'HL1 3 - M remained; HLunberea 1 Levet: 1 , rtut+er FFIJ %tile; a, b 4 ..- + gait AL: 1 + L aft + fJlgre~d 8L: 1.75" + faDaften 2' s lnreeet at; a" C]TY OF SPOKANE VALLEY STREET STANDARDS 3.2.5.53.4.4.5 Background Project i13ackgritu11s1 ]la~;Jject traffic wb,ull include the following: a. Traffic from newly consttuctcd projects; b" Pnrjet I : ;;rr which traffic implu21:5 have heen Ienla_li'• ely reserved; c- I'n:jrwL i:l,°which, aConcull'enc4C;zltili::a: lift17ia1_av:rded; d. Non-pr*.ct, geucral !;;Icy in e. 11.1.L.':,! 24.! Lruira: fcm- v,ILJ111 hililLilt iJ;1:lerp,f}Ing :e.el :' c,'lpOleilt- l1_c 1ik {Irx! 7rovic1 ri-„foliowiuginformation for background projects. n5 iriLr,li f. a, Vicinity:-. h, T'ripk;rl .r,1.i �n; c. 'Fripdistri,,_ition; d. Planned transportation improvements (private. dsweloprocrit wu] r- 4 t)S and sa]vt4. awakes i; reStl]L,- 3 fi3.-.4.6 Analysis Scenarios The TTA shtUI include the lid lowing analysis scenarios_ a.. Existing conditions; b. Build -out y sir- without projoet; �- }3u]lal�tut Aar with prttject; d. Build -out + tib e4"'.r,ar analysis if project is expected to lammed in phases, rake more Ilion ix{r"r yefar;l to co npleLe, or if the sturdy interiectiocw is included no the City's Sis.6-Year •11P; anti, e- 1.3u11,1 out Year 1 31] analysis if the project mitigation inroIv imtatitAt[ort or mL1djfic31iorj to Lan inrct:;4x ticlrl L'Ltn trot. at:4li ajLlr alcve;aclpmentiwith nmdllie±ssig,r+:parr+Tuxt uir4-eeeeasEiro}uttnes i3het}1re iorral impacts .mar be eaeituettc. _use the CurreIt version of the SRTC Regional Tied Demand' nd' Jtiodek_jaarj tlj�it3S1;1S`Ii7�CxI h[lril017 '.' r'ti L W nnkilv,c , LIS fiche -mined hx C'iL� stuff 3.2.15a73.4.47 Other Analyses Cllher antrlymc laity he required as requested by the City, including but not limited to_ it. Sight dislaariee; Adapied1.1.—eL4r211.99h- NN_MJlai Cliaptcr3-TrflifrcAz 1}sia 3-15 CITY O1 SPOKANE VALLEY S'1lthLT STANDARDS NDA DS l aeuc lula tQwit k ti uiline* rtrL ebeti<nr ; el,a, sac>ac lengths at driveways and drive -u throu 1 win low . C.714 Noir; f,.c=Air puaIity (typically required when physical iarrproverents are proposed and requires electronic submittal of Synehro filet); gel lraEeryxction control warrent 1narlyyi (i g,ill,�?1tiFlCEahrhlal, tollr4-4a2y stop, yield); liTe.Auticiliarylanetvataantanalysis; til'nc3llips] Ii iinj2_%: Ji I�. 1��i11�i1L Cni tctetij Site access; and,. tit. Pedestrian access study. 3.� x.83. •i.8 Findings The following shall be addressed in the findings section_ a. Traffic irnpp,£ts; h. Con,IallanKe. wil}i 1CYC1 a}r rvia:C tiiaul{lalribi; c.. Proposed project iivireveirtet3tsiliodilia:alkalis. and, r1. cci. ni 112 Ear;ulna and Offsite mitigation. 3.25.91.4.:1) ,1rpen di£es '1he following information shall be included in appendices_ a. Tlc nilions; 1>. lripgeneration sources; C. Passer-by and origin-destinationstudies; al, Volume and limling malrerncnt count sheet$; 1_evtl el s rvicecalculations €e Sync.hr4 report printouts (electronic submittal may be required); y- Vummtamylytiix a>tluulaLinnx; und, a. References_ 343.5 MN(r.S A public Jncetingts) mrty s c,}crat:ng over 100 PM peek -Immo- ip .a:Drnn7r :.1 t:,.:j::c';, :? .:r;l. :.r!, rips nnn;IulmgaJ rre;;idenlial area, of for t::li r :j.vi:: _L the Ji :i .i ,i ,y' L' . i'iry .j lit.ill. the 's,LhCic meeting is to let the pub,', r}kv about the pre E „s: eet and to :;.I .ow0/ fcr u°.I: Jir. input i4do11(Cli r'g•. �f') 1': .1 it CNIFIrr TnnFk rrnntysix 3-1G For/LA-tad:. Rw.1i J +tehet 1 + FWIrberin4 `-tyle: a, la, c,.. 1 Stift at: 1 I Wham trft 1 Allgnedat; 1,15`4 TabalIer l -i- Lr[.lbltaL: 2' (.:rl'1°IMI``jSY}KMJ !WI :'I. NI}R1211r to t etc_ ti :nc the scope of the .11A. Notice of date, time, place and purpose of the public lic I0.= ill!'rtil t,flr.91 h provideal by Ihi, fo]Io3ving means: a. On. ;?ubtiaation Itl Ji (i t ` Sl}tirkd1 c VaIJa a ollieiat newspaper at leas'_ 15 days prior rp Iq{ meeting; h, A r. it r. to inljaauent r4yiiULL:nts, propr'.rly awracrs, ncighharhoo(I gulps, .jkhri5,3_�lL IL s, and -al' ol_ arch tions within ar 4t]t]-rrKiL radius cif tlhc- project boundari„s, not less than 15 days prior to the public meeting_ !Other persons or yr!., ... ; ' , tadR rat be I .guir.tid 1,n be notified if Mc !City II._ . t.:sl h thx. prr;pnrs4^tI pmj.Yet or 113% c riOivc %,Yil.;,,_' and_ E.!,, A si , i shul l h crccletl, orr !he subjccl property fronting and > djaecnt to the most heavily' traveled pu11k street, at least 1.5 alas: prior tar the rneetingli, The r ig i shall Ere at feast iour+f feel in vridtti and Falyrc'# Feet iTt heiglit ,and 1h29 have fe.tt,ctf; hlrree3 inches in size. The sign shad be easily read by the traveling public from the sigltt- trf-wily- This sign ihsall;rrlrtemIcv IN; date, thio anal p1acc of the traffic mcclings and provide a brief eescriptio,h o f the project_ Proper notification and all associated costs shall be the responsibility of the Applicant. NoIiiealiv'n shill] he calms.idLrc:I ;rl1isfied upon roccipt of an affidavit provided by the Applicant 1.0 the City Statlll� the about requirements have }Teen oiaarrpleterl, rtilrrlltrrxl474stii„trf'0tl7''_}:X 20 FR eturpter 3 Tralis Aanlysis - I CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY STREET STANDARDS CHAPTER - REQUIREMENTS FOR PLAN SUBMITTAL• Chap ter Organization 4.1 INTRODUCTION 1 4.2 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 4.2.1 PLAN COMPLETENESS 1 4.2.2 FONTS 4.2.3 SHEET SIZE / PLAN MEDIUM 1 4.2.4 ENGINEER SIGNATURE AND STAMP 1 4.2,5 SCALE 1 4.2.6 NORTII ARROW 2 423 VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL DATUM 2 4.2.8 UTILITY LOCATE NOTE .2 4.2,9 TITLE BLOCK 2 4.2.10 REQUIRED CIVIL PLAN SIIEETS 2 4)11 REQUIRED TRAFFIC PLAN SHEETS 3 4.2.12 OTHER REQUIRED PLAN SHEETS Adopled Decerill+e-f-24)414 Chapter 4 —Requirements au Plan Subrnittai 4-i CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY STREFT STANDARDS 4.3 SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS FOR PLAN SHEETS 3 4.4 COVER SHELT 4 4.4.1 .A PP AlBILITY 4 4.4.2 1v1INIIvILIM ELEMENTS 4 4.5 CT .F.A RING ANTI GRADING PLAN 5 4.5.1 APP.L1CA13IL1UY 5 4,5,2 Is/II-NIMI„PvI PI ..AN ELEMENTS 5 4,6 STREET IMPROVEMENTS PLAN 6 4.6.1 APPLICABILITY 6 4.6.2 Pvl 1 N1M1.1:\4 PLAN VIEW ELEMENTS 6 4.6.3 MINIMUM PROFILE VIEW ELEMENTS 8 4.6.4 MINIMUM TYPICAL CROSS SECTION ELEMENTS . 8 4,7 ON SITE EVIPROVEMENT PLAN 9 4,7_1 APPLICABILITY 9 4.7.2 MINIMUM ELEMENTS FOR ONSITE IMPROVETYMNT PLAN 9 4,8 DRAINAGE PLAN 10 4.9 TEIVIPORARY EROSION AND SEDEMENT CONTROL PLAN 10 4,10 TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN 10 4.11 PERIWINENT TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN 11 4.11.1 AREA MAP 11 4.11.2 ItOAL) SEGMENT PAGES 11 4,11,3 SIGNING PLAN_ 11 4,11.4 STRIPING PLAN 11 4.11,5 TRAFFIC SIGNAL PLAN „.„,...„,„.„. ...... ........... .......... „ 12 4,12 SITEPLAN OFRECOIW 12 List of Appendices Appendix 4-A - General Construction Notes 13 Aclopteci-1)eeenitrof 2009 Cliktpler 4 —Requiremeots for Plan Subraitial 1-4 C try' Orf. SPOKANE VALLEY STREET STANDARDS 4.1 INTRODUCTION '1'hc Applicant is 1e41 ui c:omplete plan set [or all proposed public and private improvements. !]tis chapter provides the mini mu -n-1 plan elemenLs For a complete !uhmittal. "I o be for review, plans shall be clear, concise and easy to read with all lettering and Imes Hand drawn plans are net acceptable. .lnc:orii,plete plan sets shaliwilll not he :eviewed and will be returned to the Applicant. State lai.v require tlh.at engineering work be pet.fbrrned by or under the direction of a professional ::fgisiccr currently licensed in the State of Washington_ 4 a hington- 4 2 GENERAL L REQUIREMENTS 4,2.1 PLAN COMPLETENESS All plan suuhmitials are assumed to be the final plan set and so all plan sheets iitir every submittal shall he signed by the Applicant's Engineer pui-staant teas per Section 4.2„5 4.2.4. It is the responsibility" cif t'Thc Applicant's Engineer shrill:It-et verify that all Minimum requirements specified in the Street Standards and the LSpoii'c»i Regional LSiornmater Manual are niet and are incorporated in the plan set_ Eachsul:mittal of revised plans and supporting documents shall be accompanied by a lcttcr that indicates how each review comment was addressed and provides a l ric.l' description of any changes made that were not in direct response to a review comment, 4.2.2 FONTS T,eitui shall be legible to ": ca.:il:: read and understood by the reviewer_ Tettering shall he or" sufficient sii}x:::<it.:I scale to produce clear, readable images when scanned hy cal scanner, 4.2.E SHEET SIZE 1 PLAN ISI E D 1 U 1 1 All plan .sets shall be plotted_ or copied on star_dard drafting paper with dark ink. When the plans or: plats are accepted, the City will specify the media type required in the acceptance letter. All plan sheets s1 a 1 be 24 inches by 36 inches :13 size). 4.2,4 ENGINEER SIGNATURE AND STA tiP All sheets shall include the engineer's si,-1.:ldturC, stamp, and date of signature pur_gutant _torn accordance with the reg..thiLiiins es'abli°,Fic.d by the State of Washington Board of Registration c.f Pro tiii 1 Enginetii-s. 4.2.5 SCALD' The he scale for all plan and profile sheets shall be: a, 1-Tcrri'ottital: I inch 20, 30, 40, or 50 feet (scales greater than 1 inch.— 50 feet shall not he accepted) b. V cr.•ti caL 1 inch = 5 or 10 feet As4ep #}e nitter 201).9 Chaptet 4 - l equifor Plan tiuh lttta! 4 - I CITY OF SPOTKANF, VALLEY S'CRb E'I' STANDARDS 0. Overall plan: 1 inch = 100 feet, maximum d. Cross sections: vertical exaggeration rat.° shall be 5:1 4.2.6 NORTH ARROW All design sheets stall have a north arrow oriented toward the top or right side of applicable sheets. 4.2.7 VERTICAL AND IIORIZONTAL 1PATIJM The City of Spokane Valley vertical datum sell be ha,�ed on the Na tits 1o0r American. Vertical datum (NA VD 1988). The horizontal daturas is a coordinate systerri ba: cd on 19 3(9 l) State Plane Coordinates. 4.2.8 11TILITV LOCATE INU'1'E All utili ties shall he located prior to coristriuction All sheets shall have the Following message: CALI, TW( BUSINESS DAYS BEFORE O'G DIG 811 OR 1404 424 5555 t 9 f'1.T..t.,F .00K talc b.ock is required. ou every sheet, The title block shall be located in the :agenic kiv.,er right hand corner, the right side margin, or a]ong the bottom edge of LI C sheet. l lac following information. shall appear in the di [le block; a- T°ro.',ed mime and number (including permit number, Short subdivision, -iii;sA', i t3 or Binding Site Pian nunrrht-rs) provided by the City; h- 'Lk.' 1.vpc and location of improvement, (For profile sheets, the title block shall have the name or tlic strcet and beginning/end stations); c. Engineer's name, address, including zip code, telephone number, and fax number; d. Date lir:! bri ]e ca-iption or all revi.sioris., e_ S -icer nth ,7bcrand total number of sheets; and, 4.2,10 REQUIRED CIVIL PLAN Stl1!ETS Civil plan sets are reviewed by Development Engineering. The .civil plan set shall include the ]bilowira, , as applicable: a, Cover sheet (see Section 4.4); b. Clearing and. grading plan (see Section 4.5 ); e. Street improvement plan (see Section 4.6); d. Onsite inr prc;vcr rc:7I plan (see Section 4.7); c. 131. itulgc plan {sec. Section 4.g); f Temporary erosion and sediment control plan (see Section 4.9); and, Acdoilitr. teeem6cr 2404 Chapter 4 Requirements for Plan Submittal 4-2 CYrr' o S r::. r{ ... r VALLEY , FItEET STANDARDS L. Delrri] sheets, aS needed. 4,2.11 REQUIRED TRAFFIC PLAN SITEETS Traltic plan sets are reviewed by the 1iaT.I.,: 11ikisiur, of the Puhlic Works I)eparinient- The to 1'H e plan i,c+. shall include thc following, as applicable: a, Permanent traffic control Cil :in (see Seg=1.i,)n 4.11); bn Detail sheets, as needed. 4,1,1 2 OTTTFR REQI IRFID PLAN SHEETS 1}41r 0!' iS reviewed by Development Engineering and the Planning tion 4.12 for the requirements from Development Engineering. 4.3 SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS FOR PLAN SHEETS This section incorporates flections 4.4 i_n 4.12_ which outline. the minimum required inl(rrmatiom included on specific sheets or. the plan set. The sheets arc listed in the order (hey (I afTear in the plan set, Some sections ol'the plan set may have more than one sheet, but should he I abcle d alike. 4.4 Cover Sheet 4,5 Cleariiig anid Grading Platt 4.6 Street Improvements Plan 43 On-site improvement Plan. 4,8 Drainage Plan 4.9 Ternper-,.!ry 2,:,ntr'o1 Plan 4.10 Temporary t ::f c Control Pfau 4.11 Permar.eni Control Plan 4.12 Site l'!air [rl }ti:ccr�'t:l m- -I r,y_ema er 2014 Chapter 4 - Requirements for Plan, S bmi tdn] 4-3 CITY OF St'01(ANE VALLEY STREET STANDARDS 4.4 COVER SHEET 4.4.1 APPLICABILITY All plan sets shall include a cover sheet. 4.4.2 MINIMUM. ELEMENTS 'laic following shall he included on the cover sheet: a. The project name and the number (including per liit number, Short Subdivision, Subdivision. or Binding Site Flan numbers) shown Lt! the. top center of 1 pa c.. b. A leges*:::,'j,.:ilnt.y nitsr . approxini t l 8- f; inches by 11 inches, showing the lo,:at*.,fl ane name of all arterial _oa{1ways within one mile of the and all other roadways within 1/2 mile of the arc tri] ,ctt : �:,trvrti.�_i.r i�_ The project area shall he indicated by shading; Ari 4.e..::ts within the pian set; d. Impel -00m area L$1t.intitie, For all ccmirnercial projects. Quantities shall include the ext ;tH'is_, ;:.rr ern rtd .end kottal rooftop area, pavement: area and gavel area, and in : {}','crcill, total impervious area; c, Type of roofing material Isar all con ;irsc.rcial projects; f. Section, Township, and Range: g. Lagen&IoI Iine tv°lpe and v nbois Icer all appurtenances related to each type or Iility; h. General construction notes as provided in Appendix 4A; I_ Applicant's signature; j. 'fhc datum used and all benchmarks., which must refer to the established control when available; k, Private Improvements Statement. The note below shall appear on. the cover sheet of the coiisti....,ctic.i plans that include private streets and. Ti r: Cif), of ; ;c,,`crrn T' rfr will nor' be responsible for tae n1(7t?'fil.'Hance C+7 '1 'r etffand a il) i.''c.p'Yfitat improvements, fr�w/vdlbg ston: cfrof r�r f e .i i iii 7.r?r :ii�L2 „9.10).;', fol the following private stf'E'E'.i : (/ixi 1, carne t,i'owner and .'tpill icw11 .10cprr.'r)rtrWl7 s: 2i)09 Chapter 1 — Requir mums fur Plan Submittal 4-4 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY STREET STANDARDS 4.5 CLEARING AND GRADING PLAN 4.5.1 APPLICABILITY CIcr.ring and grading ]ZeeLs are required for proects applying for: a. A clearing and grubbing permit; b. A gr's icing cwily permit; c. A building permit for all new non-residential development and ["srr .t sidcr tial construction oftbur or more units per lot; ci. Sbort subdivisions; c. .Long subdivisions; or [.. Binding Site Plans. 4.5.2 MINITivii7M PLAN ELE TENTS grading sllects shall clearly convey design and construction intent and. shall depict only the work to be clone with Llt4 requested permit., Clearing <uid g'.,.ii:i. hcets shall iItud _ as applical3le_ i';.operty limits said accurate contours cf existing ground elevations. For existing topography, Inc -'foot contour in_uTvals arc prt[ 'i -red unless the City dcicl'tniues That available Fi.,.5-foot contour niappiiig is adequate and detai]cd Lilough to clt crihe current 1LundInrrs: b. TI -ie extent of clearing and/or grading areas, delineated and labeled ''excavation" or "fill"; c, Finish contours to be achieved by the grading and related construction. 1"lic contour interval for proposed topography sliallffilast belle more than I- lbw, unless the slops is greater than 1 01!ji-Reeeftt, in which cit c; the City may accept live -5 -foot contour intervals. Periodically call LLL the proposed slope. (tic -foot contours rs may still he neees,saty to show cerLruu features such as wales; d. Existing and proposed surface and subsurface drainage facilities; 1 . Futotprinl or t,nsite lioilding5 or structures and the location of adjacent °,uildinL , r alit{.iI _ti_ '..:';:ate':I within '5 feet of the property or which niay rye 47ff::k.re. v ,llc :;,...roposed grading operations, [he pr€clic, ;rail :`r1t]'f'7' i'-t.iuur street, spaced every 50 Ick :I" ,'1 3 111j Li by the ('[''. Ishall proposed :}r,i ,_.:i hitt' tial': t_raphy alone the street_ a_ Tic in points and pi.operty boundaries; liiibr ation eoveiin ncluriin.g,. but nett limited Lo, specification Of Tile soil compaction r„ be achieved in. any ureas of fill placement; 11. Estimated amount and v"ertic"al dimer iiitis o[" till ,1nj I11f.; Adopli.41 Chapter 4 Require,ne.nt%for I'Lari 4uhrikta CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY 'ilif'RT STANDARDS i. Delineation of sensitive areas, floodplain,, and critical areas [)Lt 41.1alt to peP tF e-SVN1C 'Title 21; j. The approximate location o 1111 trees i iglit-inches diameter breast height (cibh) and larger, and a description of the tree protection standards to be implemented during construction; k. Delineation o1' any area. to he preserved, 4.6 STREET LMPR EM1 i:S PLAN 4.6J APPLICABILITY Street improvements sheets are required l'Orp,i'r�jeels a. P_oposingnew or to public or private street or street extensions; b. P: oposing private engineered driveways; or, c. Required to provide frontage improvements. 4.61 MENTMTJ T PLAN 'VIEW ELEMENTS the plan view shall inclucle, at uminimurlI. 1'ie-l:c.,,I,w a. S_ITV C x 1! 1 rc•s and ststiot_ina lines, r , ,: ,: l -,,.r,. Hilly be based on centerline [sl.,L1-Lc.L. (.) hc.r p!ctilc:4 ni i_,, •:.l1.1111 e referennced k ' CL11Lerlelle ::L lLI 011111' . SLail i+Lill r= in 4. 11"'.Iw ;:i :; shall be 011 the cenLer] ine to ',he center o1'the bulb, di rr.:°I 1 ,;rc::' :,',.,[ji along the flowlines within, the bulb; Property limits arid accurate contours of. existing ground elevation;. For c `,sting topography, one -root contour intervals are prefer}ed 11iiles c the City determines that available 51ive-root contour mapping is adequate. and detailed enough to describe cuarre1141a dibr ns; c, Finish contours to be achieved by the grading and rel l.te f eon rruciion, The contour interval .dor proposed tr)porapl-y must be no more than one- foot, unless the slope is greater than 1 0°fir-pere rtt, in which cruse, the. City "my accept1,ttvc-foot contour intervals, Periodically call °tit the proposed slope. Cue -loot contours may still be necessary to show certain features such as swales; cl. Lot lines, lot numbers and block numbers; e. Proposed and adj oining subdivision nannes; f. Existing and proposed street names; g. Section, Township, and Range; h. Existing and proposed property xnc1. or rivlit-or-way tines, casements. and/or tracts. All of them shall be labeled and c1inteuxi{aricd:, i. Road alignments kt•ith I (}O -[int stationing, reading from JeI.'[ 4o right, anti stationing at points of curve, tangent, and i:ilc. scctioi1s. 1.1r; ith. apptoprtate ties "1idoptez#-Dcrx.mber200`L ti_hipt r 1-1ewlirerrirot!,ror1'Ifir htiltYartilirt7I 4 — 6 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY STR RFT STANDARD}4 W existing road sLtl-vc s and stationing, s etioxi Cor11i7s, quarter corners, ;tnd tire County OPS c4Snivol net. Stations shall increase from west to east and from south to norl.l7; Niacin lines and stations; k. Bearings on the road centerline, keyed. Lo an associated plat map; 1. Station and elevation of all horizontal curves including PI, Pty's, PT's, etc:.; existing and proposed., eetitcrfiric bearings, distances, and complete curve data; tn. Curve data including radius, delta. arc length and sen_'.-tanZeni I en gr.h 011 tall wtrret centerlines and eui b I-ctun'ris: n. Stations and elevations o.I'all cin -i7 reltn-ri-:, incli.tding beginning, mid -point, and. ending elevations of curb returns; o, Location of all proposed and existing approach. ; p. All existing utilities; q. All proposed utilities Chat will he designed and constructed. The pien sheet shall show the extent of the pavement cut for connections; r, Proposed drainage leatures including. station and type of all structures, direction, of' flow, size and. kind orL L'14 LlriiI i .L° ctiani1L:1. clinch or pip, rid ani' ether requirements as specified in the Spokane Regioncrl . iooniv[7!E'.�' Mairval, as adopted or fended; s. A borough search kr all survey monuments shalt. Ex conducted. Any survey monuments sliaall be shown; t. Fire hydrant locations; u. No Parking ;siLgns and locations; v. Tirna.I'oLI1Ld locations; w. Fire eine gency recess easements; x- Marne elements such as conduit, junction boxes, signal cabinets, electrical sce, signal pales, push-button poles,, and loops; Storm drainage flow direction allows, pirticullarly at intersections and all high and low points; and. z. Station and cri Lica] elevation (I1cw1ine invert u [' pine, ere. of all existing arid. proposed utility or drainage AA.rny:tures. T,oe.tLLidrli ()I' uLilitiL, ;half be identified with horizontal and vertiicz.1 dinieiisis ns as measured Fnmi roadway centerline profile grade. Y. Adopted d 1) rubor 4 .'h pier• 4 Requirenients frsr Nan. Sithmittal 4-7 4.6.3 MINIMUM PR FLJ4E VIEW ELEMENTS The profile view shall include, at a ininir[1unri, the fialowing: a, Satinning, shown the same as in the horizontal plan, reading right. It shall include stationing of points of curve, tangent, leti }rig. ;,0,n: of intersection of vertical curves,. with elevations to 0.01 feet, 1-,. Original ground Eine at 100-fbot stations and at significant- nnL `51_ttlo. €od topographic features., based on fielc measurement and aC 1,11A 0.1 feel. on unpaved sLn'Iauc and 11.01 feet on paved surface; c. P:olilcs for curbed t ccts shall sliow label the laps of both curbs and ll-.e centerline. Profiles for shouldered streets may show lase centerline only. The centerline, Lop of-cutrb, and existing ground lines of all streets (except cul-de-sacs) shall be continued for I00 feet beyond the proposed constru cion; d. Tligh and low point and PI of all vertical curves; c. D itch and swalc flowlines and dr; in e s1r'ttctures; f. A continuous pro file for both existing aid proposed improvements, shown on a grid cif .numbered linea; Elevation of vertical grade breaks, K values, grade and length of vertical curves; h. Storm drainage flow direction an-ow°-' particularly at intersections and all I nw points: and. i, Su; ;,nfl critical elevation f 17oti. line, invert of pipe, etc.) of all existing and proposed utility or drainage structures, Location of utilities shall be identified with horizontal and vertical dimensions as measured from roadway centerline profile grade. g.. 4.6.4 MINIMUM TYPICAL CROSS SECTION ELEMENTS A typical street section shall include, at a minimum, the following; a. A separate full -width, typical section rtcluircd for each street or portion of the street that differs significantly. The typical rection shall be drawn looking in the direction of increasing stations; b. Station limits; The dimensions of traffic lanes, shotiIders, gutters, sidewallts.. swalcs, depths, planting strips, casements, rights-of-way, etc.; d. The cross slope of elernenls such as pavement, ditches, sidewalks, etc.; e, Tye of curb; f. Dimensions and type of stinctural section material layers; and, g. Retaining walls, as applicable. 4.4e #cd Iecennher-.2-109 C`lia+tter4 Rcquircmcnts for Placa Submittal 4-K CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY STREET STANDARDS 4.7 ONSITE IMPROVEMENT PLAN 4.7A APPLICABILITY Onsite improvement plans are required. for projects p posi-ng: a. Ncw commercial developments; b. Residential construction dr three or more units per lot; c. Drywells; d. A project site that will have hct]i o[thc IiflEcmwitlg: i. Any addition or replacement of impervious surface and. cnr more Iota] square legit or impervious surface. If both of tl_;: _.c criteria arc inet then the runofffrotn the new and/or rL'ptaece P ( 1lS surfaces and areas hydraulically connected to them will need in he treated pries- to disposal. 'The site includes all of the parcels inv. lvecl iu the project. whether or not they are contiguous. Impervioussurface incitideti root.s. paved areas, gravel travel ways, etc. lull build -out includes all the project's phases even if - 1. The di ri event prlrt es %,,..11 be ctm ti-tt Led t oldel` Ncparaic courrrac:l •ind, )r. by sopa aze owners, and;ur, 7. 'Ric project is phasct1 over multi years, but the phases are s1�11 under a .nit i i nth lai1 for kmg term dcvclopment; and, c. Increases impervious areas to 5,000r s tier al'e feet or more; i, Alters site access requirements, including adding of removing driveways; Or, ii. Ccrrinects to and impacts City str cts and utilities. 4.7.2 MINIMUM ELEMENTS FUR ONStl'E IMPROVEMENT PLAN The onsite improvement plan shall include, at a minimum the following: a. P17operty limits and accurate contours of exisliug ground elevations, For existirLg. to ooLraphy, one -foot contour intervals arc preferred unless the City dete]TIiric that available litr_f-foot oantour rapping. is adequate a.nd detailed enough to descrihe current Iandlhrms; b. Finish contours or spot elevations to be aclhieved by the gading avid telated construction. The e contour interval for proposed topography must he no oliui2 than 1 -]Tint, ur11esi the slope is greater than IOT0 percent, in which i.q e, the City may accept &foot contour intervals. Periodically call out the proposed ;;Iopc. Orte-levet contours may still he necessary to show certain features such as swales; c. I.f..1 lines, ]rpt numbers and block. numbers; d. Existing street names;. t'7dr+pred-Dceembi. r 2009 Chapter i—Requirements for PI' it Suihrryitj.i1 4-9 CITY OF ST'01; AT,TE VALLEY STREET STANDARDS c. Section, Township, and Range: 11, Existing and pvopn ed property andi4 n - light -or -way lines:, cascrnents, and/or tracts. 'Pylae and dimension of easement or tract shall heclea,l Itthaled Dimensions of property and right-of-way lines shall be marked_ g. -Location °i"all proposed and existing dr: veways; h. !4{l existing utilities; i All propD .'i'.:i itie that will he dcsign::d and coristrueicd. the plan shall show the e.xier-x3 r ,' pavement cut(s) liar ponneetions: j. Proposed drainage features including, structure type,. locating in.lorm.atzuu, direction ol" flow, size and bind of each drainage channel, ditch or pipe and any other requirement as ;,-;peci lied in. llie .Spokane Regional Siormwati' Mantfai, as €I ted or ;amended; k.. Fire hydrant lcocations; 1. No Parking signs and locations; rra- T rnaruund lc�ttuir�n : E. Storm clritinate flow direction arrows, particularly at intersections and ail high and Joy,. points; and, 0. Station and critical elevation (llowline, invert of pipe; etc..) of all existing and proposed titility or drainage structures. T.t coiion of utilities shall be with horizontal, and vertical dimensions as measured hoot c inerlinc profile grade, 4.8 DRAINAGE PLAN A drainage plan, showing the location of drainage facilities intended to provide flow cernrrol. treatment, and con veyate shall be submitted with. the construction plans and shall. conform in .Section 3.5.2 c}1'the ,c.ipak ne Regional StormwalGr" Alan of (S RSM), as adopted af_aniended. For small projects, the drainage plan may he included in the Onsite lnrprovemcnt Plan. 4.9 TE °1T'OT Al Y EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN A 1crirporary erosion and sediment control (TESC) phi shall he submitted Ior all projects pursuant to -specified --in Section 53.1. and shall conform xo Section 5.3_ :tact yl.e Sl M. as amended For sttaall projects, the temporary erosion and sediment control plan may be incl uded in the clearing and grading, plan. 4.10 TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN A temporary traffic. control plan shall be included with the right-of-way permit. The plan shall he in detail appropriate to the complexity of the project putsuart IQ per IVIUTCD Chapter 6 13. AMkopLed D;.cernbcr21)09 C;lhalxter4 Itequirernenr fi flanSubmitra! 4- 1!k CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY S 1'it%t~,I STANTARDS 4.1 l PERo A, N ENT T1 AFFIC (_"O.\TROL PLAN pz!r ni:.nen+ trr, I Mc plans sl5ect shall 11.1,AD_1c the components outlined below. Permanent signage and 4i•.,piu l��i: c toil t k1L ttrid in place prior to the acceptance of the certification 4.11.1 AREA MAP Separate signage and sting j:ai.xr s ;hall consist cel" an overall arca map noting all specific use areas, such i- is s .hoots, parks, recr aiion cen(er; , library, commercial, rcial, industrial, etc. 4.11.E ROAD SEGMENT PAGES The Mages following the arca trap shall be bro can down into street segments, lhr notation ' 1 signage and ,trigging d-e;tails, 4.11..3 T{ -,NT PLAN 'the pun -taller,: ;ions ,� t � r'.l :I1• sly{�11: a- Show ilt: I<].! git:udinal location of each sign (horizontal orset and station); b. SDccii':. I;=:: 7. ,n legend and sib type (from MUl"CD and international Fire (:-dc): c, petiil, t'Ic :err. HJc and applicable star- Iaid plass; d. Refer to •Su nda,_d Plan I{.-140 i:;,r post and base dimensions and installation pan: e. Specify the blank gauge of the sign; and, C. Note the rcflcctorization provided. 4.11.4 STRIPINGPLMl The Lp„ plan shall show;. a, Color and type: h_ I.anc widths, taper lengths, storage lenghs, etc.; c. Stuping/skip interval; d. Any construction or application notes, (e,g,, application tefriperatures, surface cleaning methods to be used prior to application, etc.); c. Typical treatments for acceleration/deceleration lanes, turning lanes, and crosswalks; f. Type of material (epoxy, latex, thermoplastic, etc.); and, g. Station and offset or d tnesisions to angle points, symbol locations, and line terminations. ChtipLer4—Reciufr tat iLs for Pion SiLtnVital 4-11 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY STREET STANDARDS 4.11.5 TRAFFIC SIGNAL PLAN Traffic signal installation and equipment shall he coordinated with and approved } the (i ommuuity and Public Works Department. The applicable MUTCD signal warrants shall be inet. 4.12 SITE PLAN OF RECORD Devel-HrfientThe incering requires that the following items shall be included: a. The footprint of drainage facilities including Swale , Ponds, channels, detentior>/retention basins, iii]et:, dry wel1 , etc. b. A table providing the following areas in square feet: L. l r €flop areas, ii. total pavement area, ill. total gravel area, and. iv. total impervious area. Atiople1 I)ecein.her 2tu]Q CaLard tm-'1 — Requireruwrils. for Plan 5ubrrullkil 4-12 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEYSTt{FF.T STANDARDS APPENDIX 4 -A -GENERAL CONSTRUCTION UCT.ION NOTE All work and materials shall be purstty t Loin conformance with the latest edition of the City of Spokane Valley Street Standards, Spokane Regional Stor-mwcrfer• Manual and all other governing agency's standards. h. Prior to site construction, the Contractor shall beim responsible liar locating underground utilities, Call the underground utility location service at 811 I SOO /121 5555 before you dig. Locations of existing utilities shown in the plans. me apps-uxirnate. The Contractor shall he responsible. for locating all underground utilities. Any conllictirag utilities shall be relocated prior to construction of road End drainage .facilities. d. The Con_ractor sl.iallis required to have a compete sel cel' the accepted street and drainage plans on the job site whenever construction is in progress. e. If the Contractor discovers, any discrepanciez between the plans and existing conditions encountered, the eC:ontractor shall •irrn,ediately notify the Applicant's engineer and Onsite Inspector. f. The Contractor shall take appnupriale precautions to protect the infiltration capacity ofstormwaterfacilities (e.g,., lure the facility with filter fabric, over -excavate upon completion of the infrastructure, etc.) Where directed by the City-o-r-Spok e allee, the Contractor shall place traffic control devices, the placement and type of which shallb� irs'uan conform to the rr*crm+t ! ref Uniform Traffic Control cu'iccN ( JITC1 . h. It shall 'be the Contractor's responsibility to coordinate with and. co>Ertact all appropriate utilities involved prier to construction. ii All pavement cuts to connect utilities shall be repaired pursuant to c. ,glee With the Regional Pavement Cut Policy. 1 All survey monuments shall be protected during construction by or under the direction of a Licensed Surveyor pursuant toxs required hy- State Llaw.—Afty disturbed or--inmage o - - - • • 8-0,1"-a licensed Surveyor pri af-ti- rtiticartion /final plat andlor release of surety- The Contractor is responsible i'or the Piling -of permits for monument removal and replacement with the Washington Mate Departrnerrt lttral Resources, ns required by WAC 120 070. k. Contractor shall be responsible for scheduling and acquiring electrical inspections required by the State. T- Contractor shall heir responsible forte verifyinP that all required permits have been chained prior to initiating construction. rn. The Contractor and all subcontractors shall have a current City business rcaist_ration o pektme—VaFlcy Busincs.s License, n. The Contractor and all suhcontra..ctcrs shall be licensed by the State of Washington and bonded to do work in the public rightof way. g. A,lapeeJ necimther-go4N ampler 4 — Requirements for Plan Submittal 4 - 13 CITY OF SPOiCtiNL VALLEY STREET STAN DARDS o. No work on this project shall commence until a City of Spokane Valley right -of- way permit has leen issued. p. 'the Contractor shall protect adjacent properties, public or private, at all times during construction. q. Contractors shall control dust pursuant to applicable Iawin-aecordancc with regulations of local air poll atin-control authority. r.. Contractor shall remove all construc:l_ic n --- related debris to an approved waste p disoscal site, s. Fire hydrants shall, be installed and functioning prior to the con-c„:,LrocLican cri -I ;truetures. t, Contractor shall maintain lire apparatus access lo streets during construction. The Contractor shat notify the [h1 -site inspector one busine ,; d before ar,y construction or product placement takes place that requires testing observation (Refer to Appendix 9A- MVlinimuni Material Testing Frequencies). On-site inspector shallwi l- determine the tittle required to satisfactorily ae.li=c\ c. tile necessary testing, observation: and doC.LInlcrltation, The On-site iiispector sluallwi-1-I he -required to be on site II00 til tlrc time during li"11A placement, diywell placement, and trench work. v. Supplemental notes used when applicable: i. For any curb grades less than 1,4% (4,Oi hilt), aPrerfessional Lund Surveyor Curr&natty licensed in the State of Washirip;ton-sli 111 verify that the curb fowls are at the grades noted on the accepted plans, prior to placement of concrete. The Contractor sllallis responsible for arrang -ng and coordinatcing work with the Surveyor. ii. The Contractor shall employ ra Professional i r Surveyor currently - licensed in the State of hiragt to verify that. the cross -gutter I i erns are at the correct plane prade prior to concrete placement.. ill. Concrete apro-ns arc required at the inlet into any Swale or pond,. The finish grade of the swale/porid side slope, where the concrete inlet apron ends, shall be a niununum cal' gtwca inches below the finished elevation of the concrete curb apron extension. Thise..-urtent-ten is to allow stormwater runoff' to enter the swalclpond unobstructed, without backit g up into the street and gutter due to send overgrowth at the inlet: 1v. Unlined pond and bice -infiltration ,swalc bottoms are expected Lo iiyfill rate Ina the pored floor, and therefore, shall not he heavily compacted; equipment traffic shall be minimized on the pond hoLtolras. 'Fitc facility sub -grade shall be a -medium- to well- draining material, i di a ummmwm thickness of 48 hitches and am -Minium infiltration rate of 415 inihr, Tlie racility shall drain within 72 hours of a storm event of the pond also serves as a water quality treatment facility, the treatment zone (so.•d and &six inches of treatment soil) shall he a medium- to well -draining mL-terial, with a minimum ixaf .]!ration A4oF14 4a-i)ecc er-r i?4 4-14 Ch iptcr +1 - ti11hhi i ia: CITY OF SPOF ANF. VALLEY S'I'1t.EL1 STANDARDS rate of 0.25-0.50 in/hr. Scarify the finish grade of the pond botiotn prior to hydroseedinglsodding. Testing that verifies subgrade minimum infiltration rate may be required by the Citvi eal a. n prior to construction certification. to ensure adequate drainage. Infiltrative testing of the treatment •mane is only required if soils other than silty loatu or loamy soils are proposed, v. If, during final inspection, it is found that the constructed pond car swalc roe:; not conform to the accepted design, the system shall be reconstructed so (hat it does comply. Defer to Appendix 9A of the Spokane Regional 5'TOTTnirra![:1• Manual for Erosion and Secianent Control Standard Notes. vi. PLirswtnt foga• Spokane Regitmal Storm -water Manual methods, a qualitlied licensed engineer shall evaluate, cla .ssi lv {ii,ci document the soils in the excavated di-ywetll infiltration zone prior to installation or the filter fabric, drainage rock or drywell barrel and shad determine i l' the sail's conditions aro611 be suitable knd capable of infiltrating, storm water at the design low rate. Applicant:s Engineer shall submit a copy of the documentation detailing the observations, the conclusions and the basis for the conclusions lc the City-_o-f-Spokatie Volley Development Engineering Department. If the eAppliea nt's engineer determines that the soils do not meet the design's requirements or that a condition exists preventing the drywell from funtionirag as designed, the deign engineer shall be notified and the design revised to meet existing conditions. Any revisions to the design shall he submitted to the City of Spokane Valle}' ifoT review and acceptance. instruction of every drywell, including fabric and draiurnclk, shall he observed by the e{fin-site i -inspector to confirm that it meets the design details and specifications. I)rywells chat have not observed shall huve their perronnance verified by a full-sc<alr drywell test. Adcralul-Pvcrarlbier 201)9 Chapter 4 Requirements fur Plan Subtniltal 4-T5 CITY OF SPOKANE VAT ;LEY STRE1 [. S.I.ANLDARDS THIS PAGE IS INTEN'TIONALLY LEFT BLANK rdopied Dz.:crnl,-f-20O9 Chapter 4 Requirements for Plan SubmitRil I-16 CITY 01: SPOKA VAI.1,I:N i Ra:T :STANDARDS CHAPTER 6 - UTILITIES Cha pier 0 rg a nization 6,1 6.2 Dc,ign Criteri ........................ ....... ............ 6.2.1 Utilities Locate.c! within Right -Of -Way 6.2.2 Undel.g:ot][1(1 .titis 6.2.3 Abovi..:1-01,:ild U]i?.]cs 6.2.4 Rt .'ii C. ti Appendix 6A. - 1 1 1 2 2 4 Adopted rktccnibcr 2OL1) Chapter 6 - Utilities 6 i ci i v CSI: SPOKEN[? VAI.I,IsY S'rlt HT STANDARDS TIES PAGE .TS INTENTIONALLY LI J- 1' BLAH r dapicc#-14ca ibcr 201:6 Chapter 6 —Utilities -ii C'I'TY OF SPOKANE VALLEY sTRJ.:E: [ S 1 ANt).\[tDS 6.1 INTRODUCTION The design and construction of public and private utilities located within City right; -of - way shall be in eorit7r'rnance with these standards. 6.2 DESIGN. CRITERI.+A The City has established the i;,llowing rniniirium requirements to ensure the efficient C{)nsLructiurl cf utilities wi h. the least impact to (ity transportation and utility infrastructure. 6.2.1 UTILITIES LOCA'1°E1) WITHIN R1GIIT-01a-WAY Pursuant win— Live€rdaance with thc SVMC Title .0.2O.090t—M), the short subdivision, subdivision, or bindirl.g site plan .shall provide underground utilities within all new public rights-of-way, alleys, or u ility easements including, but not limited to, those for electric ity, coininunication, and, street lighting. 62.2 UNDERGROUND UTILITIES New underground ud{lilies shall meet -the followingrequirements: a. Private utility lines shall be located ruitt in the rights-of-way only when approved by the City.. Utility ccwr i; r, les shall havet; ca,r[ra:til traricli ise public way agreernc t-eonsistcntwith the { itv sof Spokane Y' elf, ; f lun icipa! Code, b. Private utilities shall be located a minimum not-ir.orita] dis[atnee of ENO, feet from buildings and public utilities; c. When crossing public utilities, private utilities shall be located a tnininitun vertical dis[ancc of 12 inches from the public utility: d, Manhole covers, utility box !itis, and all other underground utility and irrigation access covers shall not be located within the sidewalk or 4iriveway r pproac.hes; e. Sewer u[i I it:v installation shall meetcatisfy Spokane County- ,5o,rrltrr r:/for R0(7.41'7;14 ." c; It e€ Construction, as adopted. Dr amended_ and the Department of 11..zit 's Orange Book, as adopted or amended; line installations or morlificatinr; shall satisfy American Water 11` I:s Awwociation (AWWA),SPanclard.S cifca//ons; t . I.:rxd niaarlcers shall be installed at the end Ofall utility stubs or crossings, tired [ocator trope shall be installe 1 at a maximum of &i:ti inches above all conduit4, pipe and cables_ and, Ii. The Applicant shall timely notify the applica;corn —sanies of upcoming strce[ construction: so they have thc upporturiity tCi upgrade their utilities in conjunction with the development project, i C cies A34.5r --DeeentbeT- Chapter $ Utilities G -I [:I.I. ' (}F SPOKANE VALLEY S RI.1 r1. STANDARDS 6.2.3 ABOVEGROUND UTII,rI"ILS C1n projects where underground requirement do not apply, the following requircmentsparrmete shall be rr�eteddressed in Iodating aboveground utilities- a.. Utilities shall be located pursuant toper Standard Plan U-100; b, I]tility poles azul other aboveground utility structures located on curbed streets 5,.fi ii t sruicd sidewalks shall be installed a minimum of two -2.- feet behind the hack of curb. When the sidewalk is adjacent: to the curl, they shall be located a minimum of rwo? feet behind the sidewalk, For shouldered streets, utility poles and other aboveground utility structures shall be located outside the clear zone ,pLIrsit ant talo aaccofdar3ee-with the itiASIITO manual "A Policy 017 Geometric Design of Hi hway$ t i" d S1pec is "as adopted or aarnendLd. and Chanter 7 of the Strut Standards; c.. -Utility poles and other aboveground utility structures shall not be located within the sidewalk.. Sidewalks shall have a continuous unobstructed path of at least -f i 5.-e feet wi de; d. Utility poles and other aboveground utility structures shall not interfere with driveways, intersections, Gloat zone, and all other road features. They shall not obstruct with sight distance, road signing, traffic signals, culverts, etc. This may require that existing pules be re_ocatcd at the ApplicanL's expense; c. No utility pole or other above ground utility structures shall be located in. such a way as to pose a hazard LI to the general p k ! i c., Utility companies shall locate and .replace poles and other structures with prirnd!.5; consideration given to public safety and roadway functionality, find_ 1'. when an Applicant -driven project requires the relocation of pri il ?tics clue to public utility extensions or other City required improve• ;cL,.., cost of relocation ofthe private utility shall be borne by the Applic.:nL 6.2.4 REGIONA.l, PAVEMENT CUT POLICY Modification or removal of pavement within the City's rights--of—way is governed by the most current Inland or'InvIr.ti Regional Pavement Cul Policy or as rrrlceptt? J or rtrrrcrirrfs3c ' ._ Copies nags. be obtained tom the (.`itv Porn irCenter or Cityvwebsite.-General requirements are as follows: a. Pursuant to SY MC 22,130.060, ai right-of-way permit is required tj of any person or entits,,eetivafry cutting pavement within existing City rights- of-way or on City -owned infrastructure-. &;,-.12,130.060); b, Permit fees arc established in the *akarae Valley MasterFee Schedule as adopted or ani° ndc:d; c, A pavement :tit moratorium is in effect for three years from the date of pavement or reconstruction of pavement for public streets. For streets beyond the moratorium period, cuts are _allowed if the requirements of this policy are ineL;_, and, Ad,+i C'tiapaer 6 Utilitics 6-). CITY OF SPOi(AN! t VALLEY STREET STANI:7A R1 )S d. For pavement cuts and—ether irl rnstructurc affected by the -work, #The .Applicant shall provide a warranty in accordance with this policy for Dw crrtcnt cu is and other infrastructure affected by the worlc. Icpp 1'1ttiLrr,hLr?JiO > Chripiir6 I:61iU.e 6.3 CITY 01 SPOKANE VALLEY STREE F St ANI) ARDS Appendix -6A -Inland Northwest Regional -Pavement Cut Pokey lldoptcd lic..ccrnibcr200°) f'hupter6 lJtilities 6-4 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY STREETS ANDA % )S CHAPTER 7 - STREET ELEMENTS Chapter Organization 7,1 introduction. . . . . 1 7.2 'Vermin l'ypes . .. . 1 7.3 Street s . . . . 1 73,1 Public Streets 1 7.32 Private. Streets . 2 7.3 .3 Aileys . . 2 7.3 .4 Private Driveways 3 7.4 8665!23Improvements . . . . .3 7.5 Street Geometry , . . . 4 7.5.1 Design Criteria . . . 4 7.5 .2 Right -of -Way 7.5.3 Bonier Easement . .. . x 7.5.4 Gmdc . .. . R \i§ Cross gupc . . . . . ,S 7.5.6 HorizontLil Curves . . . . . . 9 7.5.7 Verticil Curves . . . . . 9 7.5. a Skeet Su Ra! d Requirements . . . 10 7.59 CurbdGui!£ . . . . 10 7.5.10 Landscape Striparid Sw62 . . 10 75.11 Turnamunds . 10 Mewed Decemberkm 7-' OA= 7—rim ID y OI' spoKANE VALLEY STREET STAN1 )AIMS 7.5,12 flikewar 7.5,13 Intersections 7.5.14 Street 1.a.vout. 7.5,15 Survey Monurne-nts 7.5.16 Traffic .ontrol Dev ices 7.6 Roadside. f .lemenits 7.6.1 Sidewa .1(g 7.6.2 Pedestr:an Rarrips 7.6.3 Side Slopes 7.6.4 Clear Zone 7.6.5 Si.!2.":.c., 73 Mis Features.. 7.7.1 Strc„..t 7.7.2 Mailho?,,cs 7.71 Guard rai 73.4 Bollards 7,7.5 Roadway 'Barricades 7,7.6 1:,ntratiee Gates 11 12 13 14 16 16 16 17 17 17 18 22 22 22 22 ... 7.8 Approach D.zsigrk Criteria 7.8.1 Applicability 2.4 25 25 26 26 27 28 28 28 29 29 29 30 30 7,9.2 I'xistin Development 30 7,9.3 I 'raffi e Ca [ming Devices 30 7.8,2. Access I Amitations 7.8,3 7.8.4 7.8,5 7.8,6 7.8.7 Genera Design -,, DriVf\V2::: Approach }Torii] Ap:-Loach dtiis Vertical (]rade Approach Layout rii .e from Intel p Spacing - Same S'ide of Street 7.8.9 Dr:Nev.-ay Met!, 'Measurements 7.8.10 ICted 2\ C I )ri veways. 7.8,11 Alignment of C.:ross-Stret 1)riveway Approaches 7,8.12 Signalized Driveway Approaches 7.8.13 Approaches on State 11ighways 7.9 l'raffie Ca lining 7.9.1 New Development 4++ List of Mores Figure 7-1 Sight Distance Trial de for Case A 21 Figure 7-2 Sight Distanee Triangle for Case B 21 List of Tables Table 7,1 Arterial Street Design Criletia 5 Tab]e 7,2 Arterial rccL Design Criteria ..,:lirt-tniunt 6 Table 7.3 Access Stre,:t Design Criteria 7 Table 7.4 Minimum Street Approach Length 12 Table 7.5 Minimum intersection Spacing for Local Access Streets ......... ........ 13 4ilepteti.i.kieembr-21tAt 7 ." Chapier 7— SirceLiatirionti CITY OF SPOKANE VALLI!. Y ST R I Al' Srt ANDARDS Table 7.6 Minim ti!n Soapping Sight F )stance 19 .1 'alb le 7.7 Minim irn and Approach Sight Distances 20 l'ablc 7.8 Approach Spacing Table 7,9 Classifications 30 AAeved Dcaarnk.i. :11101.) Charier 7 Street Elements 7 - C=f 1' Y 01: NI'O K,i N F•' V A 1,I ,EY STREET STANDARDS. THIS PAGE IN INTEINTIALIX LEFT BLANK AL4tI to 4)eee — 4 Chapter 7 — Sctrct Elements 7 -iv CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY STREET STANDARDS 7.1 TROD UCTION The design of streets within the City of Spokane Valley shall generally conform to T4 &dation of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASI I'1'[ and the t riaitten-Dept rtrnent of Transportation (WSDOT) standards unless modified herein. Some street designs require technical criteria that are above the scope of these. Standardstiftoal and therefore are not covered. Iti these cases, design manuals from the above referenced agencies and references listed in Section 1.9-4 should sIia11 he used for a basis of design. The siandard pans referenced in this chapter trrw lotlatedeart be found in Chapter 1 1. 7.2 TTRRAiN TYPES Ter! On type can he classified a. flat, rolling or mountainous, Flat terrain k the condition where roadway sight distani s, as governed by both horizontal and vertical restrictions, are generally long or could be made to be so without construction difficulty or major expense. The slope of the existing terrain is from 0°a-reFee.FrF to and including5"}� percent.. Rolling terrain is that crandition where the .natural slope rises above and falls below street grade line cernsisterttly_ Normal street alignment is restricted some by occasional sleep slopes, The sloe of the existing terrain is from 5°%-FICFCi to and including 15°r te. Mountainous terrain k that condition where Longitudinal and transverse changes in the elevation of the round with respect Lo a street .n s rh1-LLp[ zinc[ 5.1, hc.rc the roadbed is obtained by frequent ber cF- ira{g. or side 11 i 11 excavation. the slope of the. cxi-ging Len lin exceeds 15%. 7.3 STREET TYPES Sl.,..1.s within '1!t• City inc] Ude PON ,..air Private streets. Since community needs are cd by Lk? 041i!!.1:.4!i xi by the City, most projects are required Lo be ctecc sc .l pubic: streets. Private streets inay be appropriate for some local accuses in very limited. L!'._tge. For the purpose of these Street Standards, the following sections provide additional description f sii ts. 7.3.1 i'1Jl1LIC STREETS Public streets are owned and maintaoicfl I>v he (Thy. A ll pubic streets in the Cit...., ci.reketieen classified using the f et-ier:11 1'unctinrral {'I is iticatsor; s ;ten,. which provide a hierarchy, from principal arteria IF, to Focal access streets, to accommodate existing and arrticipal.cd t:rnf ic. Street ci;n4cation; can he fn.1r!d in the City ofSpolcatioValley Corn pn.hcrisive Fan. h lc�?nrrtlxt 2404 i_ Ilriptcx 7 — Strccc Eicmcnts -I CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY STREET STANDARDS New pPublic streets inav be requiredcari be trigs t d by land actions or cicveloxent permits pursuant toas described in Chapter 2, Public streets. not private streets, shall be used to connect two public streets and shall be designed per Tables 7,1 through 7-3 and the Standard Plans R 120 through 14. 122. Sea n 7.3 - - - , , .'h Ater 7 provides alddi[ional design criteria and requirements for public streets, 7.3.2 PRIVATE STREETS Private streets are local access streets, privately owned and maintained, All new private streets shall be approved by the City. Private streets shall beefe permitted when all of the following appl y; a, Where connectivity to the public .street system is not compromised F. Where future through connection to publ'..c streets is not possible_- c, 'rile private street does not Land-Ioc!k present or planned parcels;; d, Elie private street serves from two tet nine single family dwelling lots. 'fhe private street provides direct access to a public street. Access to and �crrai private sLreetw shall be limited Lo properties immediately adjacent to the private street:..- and f I'he private street is not used to connect two public streets. Private streets shall be designed pursuant tope Table 73. 'lite design ofat private street shall discourage any through traffic ofnon-residents. Traffic :aiming measures may be utilized in the design of private streets. Private streets shall connect to City .streets using a standard driveway approach pef Standard Plan R I -f bu1 not a high volume approach. A capable, ]c;gally respUrlsible owner or homeowners association shall be established and identified to maintain private streets and associaIed drainage faci[itie in perpetuity. A plat or short plat with privalc streets shall he required to provide an executed; rueorded Private Street Maintenance Agreement and a Storrnwater 1,aseanent and i'vlaintenance Agreement that r.rbliLtti[e [-more, pr'oper'ty owners to maintain the infrastructure in perpetuity (sec Chapter 10 for requirements). 7.3.3 ALLEYS Alleys ire not typically required. However, certain projects may have the option or may :se required to provide alley atce ss by Lhe City's Comprehensive Plan or by an adopted U[s]es plan. Design of alleys typically follows the criteria for local streets (Standard Plan k 125). '1 he following is a list o1' design standards that differ from local street e[en-renis: ,'' ; Inplei [ rlectrsiher 201)51. CI at to 7 — Street Elemeuts 7-7. 01Y OF SPOKANE VALLEY Si-Rt.1:1 1 A\17:A,RioS i lls shall havc a Milli rrlttrrl width of 2.0 feel of asphalt pa vetnent- It the alley i.3 (lit::: only access point to the site, the alley width shall incct the Width rxluirements fiir ]c.>c.al access streets (See 'Fable 73); �. Curb. gutter., and. sidewalks are not required, unless conditioned otherwise; _tn€s. The pavement area may have an inverted i;rown at centerline to convey - 1. rtn1xa1c1' into catch basins located at low points in the invert. Alleys shall connect to a private. or public sLrec;t ttt cileh end. .111 uses where this is not feat.iblc, adequate turnarounds shall be provided. Alleys inaveari be 1ccated in the public right'' -'of -way or a pr.iv,]tc easement. 7.3.4 rR 'A'1 i. DRIVEWAYS Paivare. driveways provide veliic.ular access to one lot.. Private driveways shall comply ,''i'.}i the iollow'ing: d. Frivsm drivewav,, loner than 75 feet bill loss than 150 feet in length shall rtrl::ct the requirements for width at_rii grade antl—sitttifig. as private streets (SL::, Table .3); b. Fr]va:c ;iriveways longer than 150 feet shall be engineered and meet the r'ccg4,.acsrticr�ts forwidth, :rade, and signing as private streets (See Table 73); c. Private driveways 'e'. ay's longer than 750 feet shall only be allowed when approved 1y� the f `ire I )epartrenL Structures accessed hy a private driveway and which zinc r1.0t yi.sib le from the public sLrt!wt shall Jilin an address at (he street. Addre%es shall be permanent in; r nature and the numbers shall he a minimum of 4futtr inches tall, Vi inch stroke, and ccintras-.ing coo to the background. Driveways sli.all not extend nffthe end of an arm of the hammerhead tura-around. 7.4 H A L F -ST RE Li. 1M 11.t OVEMENTS .A h_rf f-str d. i.: reL.u+;,.t;(:" :,'S ;Ir interirn facility- [IrlF.-street improvements are required for a properly fronting a that is not currently built to ('itv standards. Htalf=street construction niaw for property that €tl'uts future streets proposed in the ('ity's Arterial or Local Street Plat. When hal f-sireat improvements are required, the design n f the hat] f' street shall be consistent with the existing streelatssi]LatttiuH p:u as dictated by the City's 14tiix-year Tfanspertatien all':} car Cil',' Street Pins. This requires construction of mote Ehaan hall' the street for safety and drainage reasons. Constrtictior in these circumstances requires a minimum ofone travel lane: on the opposite side ofthe r;:ctdvr: ay and homage. improvements on the: project side of the sLreoL Dedication of additional right-of-way and burlier easements are required, unless the existing right-of-way .and easement widths are Nufticicnt to fit the i niprc vemenis- Adopted Dce:uibcr (O Charo.er7 Street ['talents 7-/ CITY 0 S]>OI:Ai : 1 When half street improvements are recluir .d, a r ]illii:}_,i,. _}I 28 fbct of pave::merit is required. Streit improvements shall be designed to prc.v i Jc 4'r, inagc for the constructed portion of the street,. Provisions shall be Tirade. to al l€ + • t-„ 12S.l,::3>1.on Of the Storni draitlage systen too the undeveloped portion of the street for future construction. Transition tapers are required. when the new edges of pavement do not titch the existing edge of pavement.. Tapers s iallar'qtt c con kim to Chapter 6 of the MUTCD, latest edition. All proposed utilities located within the half -sired shall be installed during cofstrhetion. The unfinished side or the, halfstrcut shall be finished with a gra. y l shoulder, n.' ssed ditch and/or side slope to ensurr-u�.. proper drainac. :bank and pti.:Iestr!i;n and trnftic safety (see Standard Planµ, R 119). When half -streets connect to an intersection the intersection slrl;ll he designed ,arid, constructed for the full build -out o1 the street, The intersection design ;trlcl Construction shall extend for at least 75 feet [juin the, street intersection (S». 7.5 STREET GEOMETRY Factors carpra'ibulling to the geometric conditions of a street are discussed in the following sect ions. All public sta"cots inn snhdlvrsaon, including half -Streets, shall be fully constructed to the plat bourn iarie.-. Pavement, gutter, curb and sidewalk shall he extended. Lo allow future connec:T.ion.s to ?� 7.5.1 DESIGN C'IITERIA, N.1 ire l ml' in and maximum geometric design elements are set tbrthfwev-ifleiti in Tables 7. I thr'cit j2.h 73, re reg iwii n to a geometric element or traffic control on a State 1-Iiehway requires \VSI)OI I'or in-depth design information on the Ib11t}u'r'i�� , criteria, Ti . -21' 4,4STM) ; rr'o7n Book., latest adopted edition. Ai teei-J=ieeerifibe?A1:- 7-4 c1T zprei- 7 — Strt,EL F..lerneras CITY 0I' SPOKANE VALLEY STREET STANDARD 'I ABLE 7.1 ARTERIAL STREET DESIGN CRITERIA M I Ni I M U'M DESIGN ELEMENTS TER1?Ai, N TYPF, URBAN ARTECRIAI:SVSTEM URBAN Cali ..F CIOR SYSTEM C I S Ssi rcatio n Principal Minor Col l I ecum Design Aral. 40 10 35 Spc.cd (mph) Rolling 40 35 35 Molar ltainou 35 30 35 Minirrlultl SectiOil Type Crown Crown Crown 1Iorizontal 2% 3% 2% 3% 2% 3940 CIrrvc Radius'. -Plat 765 1820 765 820 510 545 : (ft) Rolling 765 820 510 545 510 545 Motmlainow 510 545 130 350 510 545 MiIIiTn111rt AI] 150 150 100 Ta:1. eIlt Ltn.gih' lit) Nriaxi]n1U17] Al] 4 4 Not allowed Supere[t wt1iron Maximum .';.31 fi (iir:'5].= Orri.) _ Acceptable h.A n t,'. Al] 2-3 2-3 2-3 Cross -slope (L?4.) \:1lalii1wn Fiat 4', 45 30 (.)T=;71 V...I'tiG:11 Rolling `i5 30 30 ti'FLI, ' (i<) Motir_ta'mous 30 20 30 N71't]]tl':11ll FItT] 65 65 50 Sag \4 rcica] ' Rolling 65 50 50 Curvet,''' (1<.:1 MQurelziinulls 50 'lt} 50 Minimum. hurizootal i:LIr4TC5 r'tle'ct sectirfi11. I°or ..upei'elev3tcd scrAi }ll.`s. Lh horizontal ;:LIf4v rk1.41SUS shall he re -calculated using AA.SL-ITO — (J .oirtetrii: 1 3.:_i1 i"f 1 ii Yl't,a:' and wl).Deds. Xadir.Y. ucc.J L,' centerline_ 2. Minimum tangent required at inlersoctiuihs 1Inrizritital curves may he adjusted it a stlper-;;le.vxo.c...1 n4'illur' i', pH:To:se.:1 - IPSe .tA.+1tI r.) _1:2conc'tric Design afHiglnvayand Ej cc1 Surc.4,t_, 4. Maxinn rn grades may b exceeded fur sl:Larl uist.alli:i;; ,., , tt - ',, a1.,.i°C .) Itis' Lhe City 5, l.engtll in feet per percent of algebraic grade dialL:rcnee (K V#Cltit). L K a A Te:11ii ?rade_ 'hall not exceed 167. Ado e€1-E+ceeint .e2L'U9 - Chapter 7 — Street Elements CITY OF SPOKANE. VALLEY STREET STANDARDS TABLE 7.2 ARTE:RIAI. STREET I)I?S1(.N CRITERIA MINIMUM WIDTHS 'I'VT`T. URBAN ARTERIAL SYSTEM 'URBAN COLLECTOR S Y NT1+;M C'[assificatio n Principal Minor (2o11e. Liar Curl) & (i Litter Re vire: Yaws Yes Yes .(Igo Type (ll Irh Shoulder' C,urh Curb Painted (:enter.' I .eft -urn I ji n es' 12 12 12 12 Inside I.mt.:..s ([t:f°l) 12 12 12 12 1InL L;;.'I I t'cl Y li l4: 1......]:..w. :k .:11:21) 1_y y 12 12 !r, C)ut:;ldc I:,iic = ifcLt: I2 12 12 12 Milli 2111.1111 Slclew...111: (ea) 6 6 6 (5 to (94 Miriimurn Int ttoii T!turn radii 11) 5 50 _._...... /10 ---.. 30 MIf7illirrrt AsOtl[t Wicl111 2 lar.e. 44' 40; _'. =::r. es 44 or 46 — 44 or 46 -- i..]:es 56 64 56 5 hires 6S or 70 7 6S or 70 — 6 hii•es SO 102 -- 7 !,1:..2:-. 92 or 94 — -- — v1. ,L41.! .;. v.tI.: t r } 7t Irl 7'.rl Ley the City, rkti d rrt.' °It!; I LSliliilll kll':' i';:(s iir'ed, the center lame or IeII-1'll r1 'Ejl}e S:^}ail I Icy 'f:}II'=e217 -:.et 1n v.-.111.711. [aaniys ul .. i'.5:o-Iarle road are shown as outside lanes. I i thv street i:, e char_~c1 ron-^ t;'a_:' In ll:.: L_ :nprehen}I 4°e Pla.ri, the outside lane sh#411 [i —& 1 CP.2: IT51°IlllflUfll. For s.tr'iC':. c]cs: n:11._cl it:.I.t C:!.:n.pr+vhensive Plan, incr'e.ase the lane width by 5 leet #1 inches to cillo ]kin{' i i'..' '.r'I! -,.! il}• 4. 1 ir.i: 1'`I1 width is sixk 1 int i koljkwenl ILr the curb and/or i.riocaL d in 5, I?v ''_' I' _tai' ai Easy of curb. 6. i a:,; I:u L svicl h varies, the larger width is lar a visor! median. included. .:s ,,r , r, ,;, ec-24 9 Chaincr 7 — Strcu(1=1cn-runts 7-6 § :;"l' i'OKANE':? I.1.'.' :` : i._ i. ] STANDARDS 'i ;11x1 ,I' `....1(:( I:SS STH Eft,SIG 1.1,:EREt: EIi f'x;1}I,l` I.1ti.-.E.: 1.1l(;.\1 ELEMENTS TYPE COM IER(.:'I:&1_ : [:4:E': ` Eri '•:.'11. `TIZ1.:E':E ALLEY IJ Ai A I I i ._.. '' �;l l!'Al.,Al! Curb & Cnritt+r Required Al] ire, YL h lL ..I r'.) 20 ;,., 2`.I 7.:: 20 Design peed (mph) FI:at 7..tijl1i11"' Mountainous •_ .51r 23 30 30 25 25 25 20 Mi ni mum E lorizontal Curie Radius (WI j i flat RoElin1 Mouaitalnaus 545 350 210 350 350 210 210 210 ' 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 Minimum Tangent Length (t?1 al. intersection's Ail 1 100 25 25 25 25 MnIrn1.1:7 SnpUrelevation Rate (%j All Not allowed Not allowed Not allowed 2 2 Mwdrrlll'ii (irr1:JL'r%' All $ R 8 10 c.cclat;ihI:;kar,,p,k2 Cross sl 1pe%)y All 2to3 2Lr)3 2to3 2to3 2to3 Minimum'r"i?a.1. Crest Ve]rticstl "tl"'rl'.$ (E(..)l Roiling 1v] 'Inl`iiT"tll,i`; 40 30 21) 20 20 i5 15 15 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Minimum Sts" '•'C:1' 1(1J Curie:, (K'Y' Flat ltuliilli, h:Ecnlnc-inoLts 50 Oft 30 40 40 30 30 30 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 Minimum Sidc5.va1lk \''iclth (i1 All 6 5 5 Not required Not required Min. Asphalt W]cl1lt (l''' All 40 30 28G (20-26)7,',9' (20`30)m Minimum Intersection return radii at thce of curb (ft) All 30 30 30 30 30 1_ Minimum horizontal curets rcilee( c, crown section, with zl Cr{.•;:,-dtirpc: of 3 perccnl. Dlhur sculiUn types should he calculated ur ni '', ill .fi ta_: rrvtrid I)cs_el7 ,>f 11i lla'ti,.' and Speeds. Radius measured. to cite IiiYe._ 2. Maximum grades iv.ry he e accede 'd}I' slrr :rt .1 -lances subject to az proval hy the City (+2%)_ I;ennth in feet peri:erceirt r,f:sIoe lrai. e.rad_ d:r-tcrcrcc(1 aluL). 1,= K' Algebraic difference in gde_ shall I,rri 'k:eE--d i 7. 4. cllrh Oi d - if located. In acorl'imercial T.d7dte. 5. Aspl:aai 5, ;III rI" s" 1:01 i(a:Utile curl" i�ll(I17i' 1.']L4ter cecti{^il. 6. Ptar;k.ir'j. per{Irc1 on . side of the street_ 7. A rrl°rumtrn l0-faoz maintenance and utility easement shall he provided ren each -at 1e3.5.t one side of the sari s';11e sreet, B. I:,,iced on the Length of the street; u1 tcl 5010 feet = 20 feet; # ti-414it]trrer 51.1.1] feet= 26 feet. l 1'k' TI!ldi!Trr.lr:r" r5'1c 1EY is 25 feel Ir, llr.ptll 55 El ii i- 4l ye l_ a ir'e hydrant is located on the private ate sl reel, regardless of llr street letjgthJscr eij °,, ol,Ji I:7 r. " r1'& 11 t, . ?-7 Chapter 7 —Street Elements 0t'spoKAiVI+. VAI,,t.,I.iY S'I Ri 1.:1' STANDARDS 9_ Streets 20 to 26 t'cet with: shall he posted on both sides as a fire lame and with No Parking signs. I'ave}T3znt WIdrt}s frl'e3ter tr}3n 26 shab he tusked on Si It of the sweet 7S R fire lane and w't'} No'l^I kiri ' i!}r}:. !fCIIr1.a is p.'o','Ide d the or. rh [o curh width can be used co {1e11e''Irwl;}e. if a "T ) I'ai'idlr EC SIP,'} ed. 1 tl. Ifil}e al .ay is z;}e r' }I ' access point to the site, she alley width is 30 [eet Mlles. the A 19.1: i.} lessthan 200, then the width 'i s 2X tr. lit UGHI J -OOF-WAY Tic public street right-of-way shall extend at a minitTl.utn1 %vie feet. behind the cutb tb_ projects with ....,cpasted sidewalk. ren the sidewalk is adjacent to the curb, the right-of-way shall c__tetrd truer feet behind the sidewalk. Right-of-way red uir.mcnts may ai street corridor. The require -II width the 1"I l",.t 'Li.1 wir0_'cL elements, inclkldin numr.l'a' of lanes, Cpl-_`,i1'cc p{srkii1_, 'ikC lanes, ? '.t'Lli_CII _ _yum lane k; roadside,, ',.valcs. F, :1U lri.,n buffer strip 4ii1Li �1�1,y, 5 }_ and bc..L.A. I ti}'�i ,'.I .IU1iLir_ eyed to the on ti Lu._ :l ti' it p ,.l [} I.gI!l-of-,,,.a 7.5.3 BORDER IICA4l{.MF N'1" Border casements shall be granted to the City can a recorded plat or b}' a ieco]ded easement. Bc1]Tde t easements shall extend from the tight -of --way line to the hack of sidewalk or the back of pih[ic facilities when located behind 111e sidewalk_ whichever is greaieithe-gpeatest. The border easement shall run the total length of the street on both sides.. Fence's shall not be constructed inside the border easement. The border easement area shall be kept clear of other objects that may would obstruct a driver's view. The sidewalk shall be open for use of pedestrian traffic. at all times_ 'The border easements may be used by° the utility companies. Utility and other easements can crass the border easement but cannot he entirely located within the border casein ent. 7.5.4 GRADE Minimum longitudinal grade shard be 0.5u percent for streets with concrete gutters and shouldered roads. The minimum longitudinal grade shall he 11.. tt [0] streets with asphalt gutters. Maximum aaI]owaile grade shall be pursuant roper Tables. 7.1 and 73_ 7.5.5 CROSS SLOPE .AI] new streets shall be constructed with a center crown, with the crops. slope per Tables 7.1 and 7.3. When widening an existing street., the cross slope may range between 2 and 4.5% percent. The cross slope of the higher pririri[y street shall be extended through the intersection. The grade; of the cross street shall be adjusted to meet the cross slope of the higher priority street, When two streets with the same classification meet, the street with [he higher 4.m.Lerage drily trip (ADT) shall be selected to act ars the higher priority street. The slope of the other street shall be adjusted as required above, 4lig. 1-i1 Dc1LcDhcs"ilK19 Chsiplcr 7—SIr'vck Flt.rnL:rskti 7 -hi CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY STREET STANDARDS 7.5.6 HORIZONTAL CURVES Crnveradii shallbcas large. as possible; the .:i!rat :,-:!rt r,;..l.i s1t+11 '.1_ .,„.;tl':gill} where necessary, The minimum. allowable tienit;r]tt!•.' !:<iii1 .r?!' llc'''!'L',}:tt'.'[i :ll!";:” 1-.1)A1 pursuant toper Talcs 7.1 and .7.3. r\iig[u are not allowed. Ail changes in direction shall be made using horizontal curves. Revcrsc and compound curves should only be used when a single radius curve will not work. For driver safety. compound ;;Lu -VCs s11at1I have a ratio no greater than 1..5 where the value of'the larger radius is divides[ by the smaller radius. Whenever tyro streets intersect, a Eau g nL length ( measured from the nearest gutter iluwlinc of the intersected street to the point cofcLLrvaLLn-e in the intersecting street) shall be provided for a safe sight distance and traffic operation. The amgle of deparlu.7-e from pcal)ondiculatr shrill no! exceed 15 degxees For the length of the tangent. [Ile minim urn required tangent 1] he pursuant toper Tables 7-1 and 7._i. For driver saioct•.,., h.orizonLa1 cure .I n1 11:)I bAgin near the top of a crest vertical curve or the H. t! :iii of a sag vertical ,_ i rx e. Connectii 11 ',ti '!1 rk,i5ting street:-: ::'1: II ,,e made to match the existing alignment grade oR°!i \irtir:_ 11111'`.': vz'!rw rts. The centerlirape f?ow'ine, and existing ground fines of ail Avec...-. except cul-de-sacs) shalt Ise Contin;sed Cor 1010 feet beyond the proposed. construction. 7.5.7 VERTICAL CURVES T[w minimum vertical curve length for pLt[3[ic and private local access streets is 5{1 feet and 100 feet for arterials. .A vertical tical curve is required when the grade break is 1 k or greater. The following guidelines shall! he followed wher designing a profile: a. The grade ]ins shat[] be smooth fowing; b. The roller coaster type profile should be avoided; c. A broken -back grade. line (successive vertical curves in Lhe same direction) generally shall be avoided; d. The grade through interseetions on strueIs shall nut exceed 69,'o-pereeiiL; c. A sag vertical or flat grade is desirable in advance of such features as }hainne1iza ion and ramp Latkeo1Ts in orde-to provide god visibility; f: The approach at street intersections shall be pursuant to Table 7.4; g. When superelevation is allowed, transitions shall be designed pursuant tcrer he latest version of the WSD07' Desi ,-r Alam rr! or 4A,SJ/TO Policy on -'eot etric ffighwayx or S1+cwy. The pivot point should be located at the centerline. The gutter profile along the grade break shall be evaluated for stornlwater conveyance. Ver'tieal carves and grades created ay and along the transition shall contour to these standards; and, Adapted Dm—lather 111110 t tuip!er 7 - Sheer tkii cllts 7-9 [:1'I Y 01. S11OK.ANE VALLEY STREET STANDARDS h. Vertical curves should be avoided at the intersection with streets or approaches. 7.5.8 STREET SURFACING REQUIREMENTS All travel shall he paved, including public and private: streets, alleys, and private driveways. Paving requirements are specified in Chapter 8, 7.5.9 CURD AND GUTTER 'type R curb and gutter shall be used for all public stroets- . W,+lieri the existing curb is not continuous die sweet frontage, the Applicant shall construct curb rind{or glitter to provide continuity, 7.5.10 LANDSCAPE STRIP AND SWAI,Ii,S .A grast. strip shall be provided between, the: curb and the sidewalk for all public streets, providing a buffer for pedestrians. The width or the grass strip shall be as follows: a, even feet wide if the grass strip is not used Liar drainage. In this case, drainage Ifac.ilities shall be located in a separate tract. Commercial and industrial projects may place drainage facilities within a draitiaigc easement granted to the City; or, b, ren Feet wide if a continuous roadside wale is provided within the strip. Planting shall conf ern to Section 'i .8.9 of Che Spokane Regional Stormwater Manual d SV' ,1( '!'itle 22 of the SV/h9c. Drainage facilities- receiving stormwdter from public streets shall be locaLed within the rights-of-way, within a bonier easement parallel to the street, or within a drainage tract. Drainage faacilities receiving stormwatcr from private structs or engineered driveways shall he located within a drainage easement parallel to the street o„ a drainage tract. 7.5.11 TURNAROUNDS Streets shall be planned, desil-ried—antl—etvistfbre.ked to connect to future developments_ Dead end pLihlic, and private greets shall .nei. he more than 600 acct in length. All dead-end streets shalt have a turnaround that meets the City and Fire Department requirements. A turnaround is required when: a. The length is 150 feet or more for a][ types of'trrivelways. The length is measured Fi-orn the Hereat intersection (S1) to the terminus of the travclway; far. b. A public street is longer than the depth of ono lot. 1}rovwd d&ditirtlesittbckad-end strcc length_ shall bc: Ihtict> tonne%.tLtl to ether existing streets that terminate at the project bouOthiry xwlierL• possible, unless it can be demonstrated that such connections would lead to as substantial rerouting of'through _traffic, onto the street a = - Mep+44-Dfteril4 .e;1'00 C'haptcr 7 - Street .E.L m s 7-10 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY STREET STANDARDS Non -motorized paths to adjacent arterials or public facilities, such as schools and parks, shall be provided at the dead-end of the street Lu shorten walking distances. This ski -di require right-of-way dedication and/or a vitsc;]1ieii[s. 7.5.11.1 Temporary Turnarounds Temporary turnfzround5 hal[ be approved by the City and are allov,recl only when there is the possibility for extending the street to connect adjacent parcels or other streets_ Standard Plans E4 131 and R 132 gide acceptable temporary turnarounds for public streets. For publicc streets, the tend turnaround shall be placed within an easement_ ('Lary, gutter, and sidewalk shall be provided to the locations Specified in standard plans. The plan shall include Tari Llage indicating that the easement is to he vacated when the street is extended across the adjtacr~.Lit pacce1. For prig rite streets, the turnaround shall be purl of the access easement and nor part of the driveway approach. ii is the responsibility or the: Apps! ic.arir to ve-ify that setback requirements Lire satisfied for Lhe lots with the lLILrt^r{ r trd. A sign shall be posted at the back of the temporary turnaround staLing Licit the street is planned to be. extended in the future (Standard Pian R- 142). 7.5.11.2 Permanent Turnarultuds Perrigiirtent cul-de-sacs shall he provided For approved dead-end public slrc:ts (see Standard plan k-I3t}). I;or private streets and driveways, ctrl -cls -sacs are the preferred turnaround; hammerheads or other turnaround i'Yptis (Static -lack:] Plan R-:.33) sliall e only he allowed for pri vale sircizts tiwalreu approved b ' the City and the fire I)epart'lient. A perniar]e.~r.t ;load-c:nc] st, :...t is only allowed when crrnnection to adjacent pi.o JCrties aand'or c,ti] " sheets ;s not needed or possible, Permanent cul -de -Saes ha[] be constructed with curb; gutter, sidewalk and swaics. The grad:', of tree. k til -tic -sac bulb shall be a minimum percent aL all places a1u,]g ilia' gutty.' lines. As topngraphy permits, drainage shall be directed ma), a1 from rhe. bulb, 7.5.12 BIKEWAYS the n1i!Iinrrurn design t ,;;:; ,l:Is for bikeways shall be per AAI iS`I'0 Guide .for the De c!ior'ru gni c ,f Bicvc, . Fucitificra, latest editor _ -Typically; bikeways are shared with t:rcr tr-aaLtsportati•:: n modes, although they may he provided exclusively for hieyelc use. 'l \nes Tcilities and planned bicycle facilities within the City be Found 1u (=:l,,i!a'c r of the City of Spokane Valley ('ornprehensive Plan. ]z:, rr.b 'r 1.11119. i.<=amo• ? —. IroC. I I,Irn[n1, 7- 11 €'1 l'Y Or SPOKANE VALLEY STREET STANDARDS 7.5.13 INTERSEC:TIO1 S 7.5.13.1 General Design 4,reet. intersections shall 1,e laid out Lhe streets inLcrsoot as ncctrty as possible at right angles. If a right angle is not possible, the skew shall not vary more than I 5 degrees from a right angle. [Opposite street legs shalcin a straight line, wheneverpossible. L' or safe design, the fol Iowi rig shat I he avoided: a, Lntersections with more than hour streets: h. i`Y" type intersections where streets meet aL acute angles; and, c, Intersections adjacent to bridges, L1 i iLonLal curves, and vertical curves and other sight obstructions. When a private street intersects a public street, the private street shall required to he stop-c,ontroLled, A private street isirubtbited t- Ir e as the fourth leg oftlie intersection at existing tee intersections. The minimum return radii shall be pUrwLrttni toe+ Tables 7.2 and 7.3. 7, 5, 1 3.2 Approach 1,cn gth The street approach arca is Where V('.-ilCles store ,'lzi]e waitiriL to enter an intersection, and Audi bc designed with a flat grade. For public or private streets, the sued. approach area at Lill irrt:°rscction shall have a downgrade approaching the i iLersecLion of no creator than 2°% percent. An upgrade approaching tl-e intersection shall be no stcper than 4%. percent. The minimum lerigt]i or the street approach area, measured from the intersected street's edge of curb face:, or traveled way where curbs are not present, lel � Lsarit lois to he in accordance with Table 7,A, TART .E 7.4 MINIMUM STREET Ai'.YROAC I1 LENGE! E! Av Cir' Daily Traffic (. T) of Hip tter Priority Road i\lniirsililyt RoadAppri.iiii'1u I �'iiRtli (Teo) ( '%„ )ii;1lr,ium. Dusv'nn r1cle' and ,1*A. i't}{1,i-hn li11 t-JpgrzidcM I Dent ;wcc,:4 St.ree;4 .' Private Roads ( I L��.t+ rrrrial r1.DT< 1000 25 At 1000 < A.)T < 5,000 50 7=5 5.000 < AIT ..-: 7,001 75 I 100 7.000 < ADT t:. 9,000 75 1 analysis required C! I ` is!" SI'O:.-\NF \':`\1.[,F,`' STREETSTANDARDS 7.5.13.3 Intersection spaciltg Arterial .;pacing shall be per r°"e_ !.._1..;pte{i Arterial Plan. streE`K _ili_l ?7!'I'S :iL :+I."t L'4w IiaLI he located al [tic nllnitritll'n s1}iirin peclfied Ili 1 ,tiff 7 5. "1.4€ i.1:7.5- i4fl' 1\'11 41 INI I'.I, I'('"I I N LOCAL ACCESS & PRIVATE STREETS PRINCIPAL • eRTERIAL '1r1 �t1lt S FrtEET 330 t'. r "--- C01.1.14.-TOR S.EPARAT ION 1 OCAI, ACC. PS S SEPARATION 's 3t1 i�.• t I Ar} test Lo 7.5.14 STREET LAYOUT The internal local resident Lai strcctt network for a suubdivision sl1o111d1 1-4 designed to discourage regional through=traffie. SolDLIivision, shill bk.: planned in a manner that nminnimizes the nurnbcr ill loelti J"C'ti:t 1.1.t70cs3ti.s to arterial; and col lectors. Street conli!uvL.[iun shall conlolly' [u a. Blocks Leng[hs Shall not L'.xcu;.l 6(10 feet �secp. t]s provided in the zoning ruguIttlions Iris ostlots. tsiil�ss Llr�iL�trc characteristics associated with !l'Lc. Iait ] ,sLlcl] a el'eeks, WOCAS, Or parks austi1\ a finger lcng[I1; h. Public streets, pri vale. s[rccts, .."tnLi shLil l lir}1 closer than tits c left Hill any point Irom an JJllk.l"]LiC p=ip rty Eine, I he only ext p[li}r]s ti 1111- rule UN; for sLrecis which shall ex lend to the plat hound�.s'ics to allow for alluie. connection and for half -street —, lt-,rizont>:tl alignment within intersection area. 1 iic hojzontal approach to an intersection shall he iaii cni. Fti !" d minimum. length pursrrant to;" peci lied in Tables i . i and 7.3. Longer tangents are highly desirable, '1.11e tangent distance is ]1leasured firr,rn the curb line of one street to the first point oil -curvature on tFie intersecting street; d" Residential developments with greater than 30 single firmly dwell irtig 11 n its shall have a minir]Tu111 ofl'W 2 Area accesses that k)c, ,:rnher ;'.'r'W Chapter 7 Street Elements 7- 13 C./TY OF SPOKANE VALLEY STREET STANDARDS meet the Fire Department scparatiun requirement to ensure. adequate emergency access; and e. Multi -family developments with greater than 100 dwelling units shall have a minimum ol'two street accesses. 7,5.15 SURVEY MONUMENTS 7.5.E5.1 General Requirements Surveys shall conform to all. applie-able state and SVMC requi rementslocnl reg antis (SVMC Title 0), Prior to any construction or maintenance activities within City rights- of-way, iglhts- of way, a - ,_urveyor licensed in the State of Washington (Surveyor) shall conduc: a thorough search for all survey monuments. Any found monuments shall, be referenced pursuant to state lam and SVM.C'tn-it +ei dtncc } t'h- -rt t-apipl-icon ic--state-and tl-regulutiona.. A copy of the references shall be filed its the office of the County Engineer, The Surveyor shall comply with WAC chapter 332-120. If monuments are found w he at risk by construction or maintenance activities, an approved copy o ['the Application I'e]Trnt filed with the Washington State DeparLm rat of Natural I&esources (MO Shall be provided to the City. 75,15,2 IMonumcntation at. Thu responsible Surveyor shall Set permanent monuments pursuant luR F !I Standard ]'inns R 1,15 with ll'rsther registration nLrinber acs Follows: 1, For p]aellll r'IC'4w ?r r'cp]acti.mc ]1 if section COTTIer*S, Cluairier coroners, closing currtcrti, witness corners, and meander corners tllaci ha:tic° bum Lli>.LIrLxd or dcsirovcd, the minimum acceptable monument. is a '.4 -inch its]L]': diameter iron pipe or a #5 (5/8 -inch) steel reirrfoning rod, 24 iilclwcy i11 length. .1'he mclnuln.ent and cap shall he 1nark ed in conformance ','r ith state laws and regulationu. Any of these corners in paved ]roads 511aI I he covered by a cast iron monument case and lid per Standard Ylan R 145. For placing new or replacement of disturbed road intersection points on arterials; the minimum acceptable monument k a V2 -inch inside diameter iron pipe or a #5 (5f, inch) steel reinfnrcirlg rod, 24 inches in length, These rnonrlmentS sn l.11 be covered by a standard cast iron monument case and lid pwr Standard Plan R 145, I -'or placing new or replacement of disturbed road centerline angle points, curve points and road intersection points (not identified above), the minimum acceptable monument is a 2 -inch inside diameter iron pipe or a #5 (5/J -inch) steel ..idaprc U:.ccni et 2001) Chapter 7 — Street Elements 7-14 CI'I"Y UI sI'#3K AN E.'Vi\URN' STREET STANDARDS reinforcing ro-d, 24 inches in length Monuments set in the residential street shall be ns showrr>I on Standard Plan R 115, iv, For placing new or replacement ofal I permanent monLtntents not covered above, the rniriinlum acceptable monument is tt l2 -inch inside diameter iron pipe or a 44 (Y2 -inch) steel reinfbrcirtg rod, 18 inches hi length. v, If it is impossible to set the above monuments, the City may approve an alternative tnonumentation method. b. For each monument being set or established, the responsible Surveyor shall: [. identify at least three ref e.nce }-mints. 1'he reference points may consist of, in circle' of [preference, urc .,s on curbs, bearing trees or accessories, nearby property earner's or an alternate as approved by the City- A completed l)\'R permit shall be. fi[=,: [ *w'itir the .DNR. with a copy supplied to the City, Show on a Record of bdivisi� n, Sbrat stiIddiv'i.sinn Binding Site P1:in _iit'.'1':'elation to comply with filed }!:; of said R.ceor:i of S11ry v, S:ilicliwision or minding Site Ptah shall he ATI:ili 1.! Li ui 4=U., as needed. 7.5.15.3 Horizontal (. `un l r of Network A i::,'AAiri ] n'i.vork previously h.',' the Spc.l.alie County=i'_'r!'t:`1' till;11] be the ittapplll'.' I'•7>= s«i ',11 ;r i .e performed under iIi'. ' .`3ic .:[ St 1tid irc]`•. be located and referenced ,c) the current co2i.rUl rn4.tWL?rl, tl.: ,.v.:19 blishc4] by the Spokane C'c;Lrnty GPS control pruj::.t tird thtl' ct .5r::likt,te system, Refer to the SVNIC Title 20,40 !or additional hi All survey work clone: within th:: Cii°Y' boundaries shall conform to the degree of accuracy rug upred under applicable laws and professional standards.. Adequate; sLlpplemcrrt{tl i;rfortrritiurr inay be required by the City to ensure accuracy. 7,5.15,4 Temporary Bench NI ark The Surveyor shad] provide a tempura bench ibtrz the roadway evcry 1,OO() feel. ThL isrc:rrrl.t`ri+r, FPP,��cr�}ll <I7;,,1 bebasecb on the +latum plaint approved by I}14' _ Pt,Y !t:'.lt':' to the ` VN1i.- .1-it1'2. 28.21) for aaclditiona] information, It requested by. the :h'- shall submit field na.slcs or a scatted .Casein., . a;%::urding to Lhird order accuracy. Rc..:f:r to \V is[rrrhgto;; S 11 ' Depa,llltent of Transportation .Landlord (Highway 21.1,...)-.97t for add hion i] information. .1 ortce.1 DrcETll:1rT 2(109 -t5 CY1'Y OF SPOKANE VALLEY STREET STANDARDS 7.5.16 TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES The City has .acloptudtises the Washington Slate WITCO as a g.uidciine for tralLie control devices= including pavement marking and signing. The Applicant shall bca responsible for providing and installing all required tra!ic control devices., including but not liriiccl ft street name. signs, rci241l;a1ot- signs (including stop and no parking), v4'ar_1i[tg sighs, barricades, :russw tlk. markings, and bicycle/pcdcstrian signs. " ;'c Parking" signs shall be posted on both sides of thc street for eurb-to-curb i :h _; ,.,I_, , , 26 l c•t. Lind on rune side. ol"thc street for curb to curb widths grctater 26 ';.:I mid up [u 32 rect. If" the street has no curb, the patvurncnt width ,ttJl be used to cic.tcrrn inc if"Nu Parking" signs itrc required. For private strc'Jts private drive...I i, d maI-timurn of one "No Par ng Fire Lan.c" sign shatll t : installed c}.cry 100 fret o! frontage or as required by the Fire Department, •AU: larking" signs on public wtreets t,h:rlI be installed when required by these u crest Standards at a separation its required by the Cit and the Fire Department. 7.6 l OAD 1T}F FITMENTS 7.6.1 SIDEWALKS Sidewa areis- required on public streets :Tong both sides .for all street classifications. When approved by the City, the sidewalk may be eIiniirirttei[ On me side tit he. street if topography or safety prohibits construction. The Applicant. shall demonstrate that pedestrian needs are still satisfied. A.c.id itiont 1ty, sidewa [] Ell tint be required on a local access street fronting the pra}jut it all of ilte. following are true; a. The project is in a low -pedestrian zone (zones R-1, R-2, R-3,1-2); h. There are no other sidewalks within its block; ancl. c. Any part of the project is more than one agile radially away from an activity :enter (which includes but is not limited to parks, schools, large employment centers, religious institutions). The width of sidewalks shall be pti.rsuatn tr_ c4-i#t Tables 7.2 and 7.3. Wider sidewalk may be required to provide corridor continuity.. At no location shall a sidewalk provide an unobstructed path of lcss than the required width. Wider sidewalk may be required at bus stops to allow bus riders a place to stand without hinr[eririg pedestrian movements or handicap access. \k'Iten the existing sidewaik is not continuous along the street frontage, the Applicant shall constrict sidewalk along the fi.onta r,e of the project to ;mo i ler. continuity, 'Hie thickness s fthe sidewalk shall be 11r11'5110,M 11.1pef Standisrcl Piari R-103. h loptc d Deeemi`rr 7`.'' 9 7-16 (.Jlrr- O. — okrI. L:1 ii .iil:: CITY OF SPOIC,1 .E VALLEY STREET STANDARDS Meandering sidewalks may be approved by the t..'ity. `fhe design of meandering ring sitileu afl€ s shall address obstructions, including mai 1 box mountings, .1-;11..cci. i irti Ir,drt}nis, power poles, driveways_ ,swales and Leet signs, witliuut dc:x i{tion front the eeq!rired design width. Additional ght-o[- v iy (car easement) ma) be required t{ accornroodate the obstructions or the meander- o[ihe sidewalk. 7.6.2 PEDESTRIAN RAM=PS Pedestr an ramps shall be provided at all pedestrian crossin.gs having vertical curb sections and shall he pursuant titer the Standard.1 Pana- i —4 146. Every pedestrian ramp shall have at least erne receiving ramp. 'This may require ct nstruciiori of "island" landing tamps, In special conditions, pedestrian ramps shall also be pray icle r, to enable' passage across curbed radius return access pints. Pedcstr_„in iniops hove detectable warning. j'.atterns formed with manufactured tru;r.cttc'c] dt:111'cs in yeiJo x, Pc:tiestri,n rannpc :.Iiallare required to meet all ADA guiciclino5. 7.6.3 STIE SLOPES Typical slopes for embankments should he :3:1 or flatter. l lie steepest slope For embankment or excavation shall 6e 11. Refer to Chapter 5 trr additional r-cc.0 JemctYts. );7 sho:_rlde:'ed streets, a minimum space of ffve# feet shall be provided between the catch of the side slope nd the rigIir-of-\'aiy lin; for the imr.a1!aiion of rrLili[v �c:1:-:>. I�:ItCi:a. s]oped ro4iuclior.:t f .perti]ing 0i7 site corrd`rtions. this i-nav rc.. 1if':. :.1.,;.,:;h':ttal right-A:wa , retaining walls, or other requirements. 'He rlrl:t a� !�Ir 141r:.pc of ibis s.,:;k shall h, '' 1, Slop.: 4=a.> , tits shall k iti.ant' CI to ti1.. City when en required h\, terrain or design 7.6.4 CLEAR LO !- Clear lone it::1,ef:gyred as a r°elati "eI , flat area void or fixed ohjec.ts or obstructions beyr.riii the tiil_:' of the traveled iva tllai t!ltll".s i1nVers to sLti?1'1 4chIb]}" or regatin C47t1IrC'l that leaves titin traveled l °7 °. 1 hit.! area may consist of a shoulc]L..r', s]opc°,. ;r lope, an 1•°c l" a clean run -out area, The t:lc.=ir;'.i b... in r l�:li° 3[ i,.Jrn i r< 1 .1u1 ;r t upon t:'attle volumes, traffic speeds; side r2.0.oine1ry. A recui: r :k _,: 1'.:: is a slope on wlii..'.:11 a td' itn:'iki !nay retain or regain control of \c.c]1i ;,' or s1:i:iri&igi Slop, -...s -latter .than 471 are f2,encraI1y considered reeovc:r' 3blc. A non-,:'ecoverot' 1c slope is considered to he traversable le but on which an errant vehicle continues 1,DD bonott7, Lniban1uncni slopes between .f'1 and 1 t may he consid cd u-aversaable but non-recoverable if they are smooth and free of yeti objects. ;) wnJ. I11Ft) Co .pi.7r 7 - Street Etwrncnn 7-17 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLE Y S'I RLET STAN DA I 1 A clear run -out area is the area at the top of a non-recovcrub]c slope' alvrlilzbl4. fbr safe use by an erlan[ vehicle. Slope slfepe.r [haul 3; [ arc not considered traavcrsatb[c and a]'e 11ot considered pari of the cl ear /:enc. For streets with Type );i or Type A curb, the following is required: a. Sidewalk adjacent to the. curb - Rigid objects shall be placed [ acct behind the sidewalk; h. Separated sidewalk - Rigid objects shall be no closer than tw,..)2. feet from the back of the curb; c No sidewalk - Rigid objects shall be no closer than 2tv,o feet from the back of the curb; d. Spcud Iirnit 40 mph ria -less - The clear Loons distance is 2 -two feet behind the o the. curb. t)[hcr p;t, crncnt edges and design speeds, clear zone requirements per • ..A I. 1.1.(}'(,:comeiric Design q IItghivays and Slreels .. shall be Lt i.c� 7.6.5 SH; 1 I t DISTANCE ANCE Sikh[ d tanec is defined as the length of roadway that is entirely visible to the driver. Ail roads, intersections, and aeeess points shall be designed to provide adequate sight distance Ibr all normal clri v lug silu.at:ions, and are required to conform to ' SH;rTO's " 1 Police on Geometric Design o,{Iligh iTs and Sireefs', " latest edit:Pea. S[opping sight distance s'nalI be ti ticta[ea[ccl for vehicle crest curves and horizontal .terve~. The stopping not be less than the distances specified in 1 ati;1.:', "'. . 'Thc`k.: ' r1Ihod lc. ':1;: ,,.IjListed for ades3 pe ent or greater, more _ I ,nc< !4c ..cti] iritr4ct:. +,}ns. int -sections near vertical or horiLorltia] 1':21- ic:n k c[ it:.,tk ,)tr-.•tr• °.ban passenger ears. f el -Pe oitar.24)09 C[ —ipi.a. 1 — Sircci ElerNms5 7- 18 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY STREET STANDARDS TABLE 7.6 MINIMUM STOPPING SIGHT DISTANCE .fable 7,7 states ;pecttreri the required sight distance For different types of intersections and approaches, "l hese values shall be adjusted for grades with slopes of3 percent or greater, number of Lanes greater than two, For design vehicles other than passenger cars, using the procedures in the AA S I I'!'[) design guidelines. For intersections. or approaches located near horizontal or vertical curves, the City rnay require the 85th -percentile speed he used in the sight distance analysis- The 85th percents 1c speed is the speed at or below which 85 percent of the motorists drive on a given :3treet unaffected by slower traffic. or poor weather. This speed indicates the conditions: Sight distance triangles shall be shown in the civil plans for all new intersections and all projects with new driveway approaches. Sight distance shall be continuous. Non -engineered driveways on local access streets are exempt ti.oart this requirement. Sight clisranee triangles shall be ole eloped by an. 1..a]z;ineer with traffic engineering experience developing intersection flight distance triangles. Fire hydrants shall be visible for at least 50 feet in either direction, A sight distance triangle shall be shown at the location of each tire hydrant in the civil plans and lot plans. The arcs, within the sight distance triangle shall be free from any sight -obscuring objects pursuant Loin ;tib--whh AASEITO design guidelines. Sight- obscuring objects include but are not limited to buildings, parked vehicles, signs, rcnccs, and laandseAping. plait -d—The; City may romove, at the expose of the property owner, any t•.ntion or objects which obstruct sight distance befatttsc sad" obstructions arc I .c,.::itils:u to the life. iienlah. and safer!.u[1]�e �rl�Yio. 44E4RI-eil-De.eerrtht.F-2(49 (. Iu pLcr 7 Strcct atcirccx; 7-19 Design Speed (mph Stopping Sight. Distance (feet) 20 115 .>5 155 30 200 35 250 40 305 50 425 1 55 495 .fable 7,7 states ;pecttreri the required sight distance For different types of intersections and approaches, "l hese values shall be adjusted for grades with slopes of3 percent or greater, number of Lanes greater than two, For design vehicles other than passenger cars, using the procedures in the AA S I I'!'[) design guidelines. For intersections. or approaches located near horizontal or vertical curves, the City rnay require the 85th -percentile speed he used in the sight distance analysis- The 85th percents 1c speed is the speed at or below which 85 percent of the motorists drive on a given :3treet unaffected by slower traffic. or poor weather. This speed indicates the conditions: Sight distance triangles shall be shown in the civil plans for all new intersections and all projects with new driveway approaches. Sight distance shall be continuous. Non -engineered driveways on local access streets are exempt ti.oart this requirement. Sight clisranee triangles shall be ole eloped by an. 1..a]z;ineer with traffic engineering experience developing intersection flight distance triangles. Fire hydrants shall be visible for at least 50 feet in either direction, A sight distance triangle shall be shown at the location of each tire hydrant in the civil plans and lot plans. The arcs, within the sight distance triangle shall be free from any sight -obscuring objects pursuant Loin ;tib--whh AASEITO design guidelines. Sight- obscuring objects include but are not limited to buildings, parked vehicles, signs, rcnccs, and laandseAping. plait -d—The; City may romove, at the expose of the property owner, any t•.ntion or objects which obstruct sight distance befatttsc sad" obstructions arc I .c,.::itils:u to the life. iienlah. and safer!.u[1]�e �rl�Yio. 44E4RI-eil-De.eerrtht.F-2(49 (. Iu pLcr 7 Strcct atcirccx; 7-19 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY STREET STANDAR I)S "I'he sigit distance triangle shall he located completely within an easement or right- of-way,. if re fired by the (:11.. 'l]i.e property owner shall hcis responsible for removing any objects Haat become a sight hazard. lI'an casement is not pr ii:(leal, the City may require additional right -of --way as a condition of dcv,L:1oprl eiu approval to ensure proper maintenance. TABLE 7.7 NUUN.IMC M INTERSECTION & APP OACI I SIGHT DIS .l.ANC E [:ASI': I1''I'I+. tHROLCIi s1R1':1-':'r iYI'E 'YHROUGH s..FItEET SPEED LIMIT (MPH) DISTANCE FRU\] TRAVELWAY(FT) SIC.III DIST A.NCP'.' (FT) Cssi A — 1Xr+cr,;p.roiltj+ Lmai k1i:cess or lok+,+cr 20 902 90 25 .._.... 115'' 115 classification C:l!. 13 — `=+i rLdl, Any 25 15' 280 Strip C:,17r'rii,_ { .(7111n-;crci l 30 335 :^, i-c_.117acli &r___._. 35 39Q ne ir+ecred ;I~ivowsys 1. hw {u"si 1 I� I �t� ,',-b 3.'; p ;'1„.:4r7r or Pre3ter, more 'than r�u-' iane ; skewed i1rl.::rs�UliU!rs. .+r 1;11' passenger cars. 2. L)!l'.k 'rurtl "wili'wr f l idltetsri;;ik;i ._ 3. Use 1'I'giirr Thefollowingfollowing types of intersection and accesses are covered in Table 7.7. Other intersection types shall be analyzed pursuant rousing Chapter 9 of A A S1 [ 10 Green Book. a. Case A can hr: used to analyze uncontrolled intersections which are .>:.:i r'!irol]ed by a stop sign, traffic signal or yield sign, •l'hey arc k.s;_i;!1 }t,<ic on siJ—lets that early kw volumes and hw,.e a 25 mph tril.,2 ] . Figure 7-1 the sight distance triangle for itik type of controlled by .stop signs or it !II;{l, ti.':r„rinicr ?i °17�:}1':.:':'ti114".• tlr i; ;7i 1`.:'`' I i.).71re 7-2 si,ov,''S dire sight al: � tit,ti r r:.snglc i:Or {_ : i1' L- Attopi L r§bat 2.003 r i,::[ LT 7 —51r=i nkrmerthi 7-20 C11Y OF SPOKANE VALLEY STREET STANDARDS (B) fritersection (:eiitei 11511 FIGURE 7-1 SIGHT DISTANCE TRIANGLE FOR CASE A 7,./1 Major Street Required Sight Dislaini c (C) it Point A is ] creat bad at the center of the minor street approach lane 105 it from tlx edge t+f tfaveled wrp1 ' CI1i nr Frrr dri+:�war ai1N>rnr,iicl+es-pan4-1-5 4---for-stop tit+taW--faad--nti �a>�l��l rote, +w_ (A) (B) Points B & C arc located at the center of major street approach through lane or in the center of the major street approach if more than crane lane exists_ FIGURE 7-2 SIGHT DISTANCE TRIANGLE FOR CASE .0 Chapscr ;1—SrrUcs Elements 7-21 U1'1 Y 01: SPOKANE VA 1,1 TN STPLEET STANDARDS 7.7 MJ C (TLLANEOIT FEATURF 7.7.1E STREET NAMES The City and the Fir'e i)epartnienL review proposed sirci'. 1i !r1e:; to ,inform to establi.s red narnes within the County grid L: expedite ropc:.',:y. i.iyntilicatiorr by emergency services, Street nomes s€ Ltt I _il,r _om1,1y win -s lr;c ", Postal Services address Lis stariclarc]s, Succi. vl is tr4 r;.'II(„14. a, Ali riortFi- oiith streets shill be cattle ° h, All east -wet .;tweets shall be c the i c, tr'eets in large subdivision!-; [hat d.i iii i-cd.,c. ii L;L[init; UrrL'eLiULLat otn e at I ire called I )rives_ d. A permanent dead-end or cul-de-sac. Li;ccL shall he cfillkd a Court; e. A street that lies diagonally to.the cast-wcst, north -south grid system and is an arterial or collector street shalIC be called a Boulevard; € A street that has its ingress and egress on the same: stro t Shall be called a Circle; and, A privage Str-eel shat1I Cie a Lane. g. 7.7.2 M [C BUXFS Mailbox installation and pl iceincrit shall coitioly AA.SHT() and US Posta! Services guidelines. Mailboxes should not he placed in sight triangles or in clear acmes. 7,7.3 GUARDRAIL Evaluation of embankments for guardrail itis:allations shall be pursuant toin at -•.h Chapter710 ,vr lrc. T S.T)OT (t:,Yr,r t ,Y,/nc:1, Guardrail installations shall eLm1v,ru;: t: T.`:r `_.'.1 -'! r' i? 'ward C -J, Ream CriC ararrail Type 1. Erni anchors shall conforms, to Pion C=6, Death! CTtrardrai? Anchor Type L 7.7.4 BOLLARDS, Poitit s cflicoess shall >),_ lo sod by a line of boll ai]s n necessary to deny vehicle cit"tL w` 1L: Lill eLiseuiL:r'It. (:'iei, or trail (except for maintenance or emergency vchieks), Minds 'alta!" b,; rcl]cciive tape.. Closure sbatI incliide one or more fixed be+!lairds oil oath side.. of (]ie trav:lecl way and r'emoval:rlc_ locking hcrlltn_i acct;; LIi tnLivc.lud way. Spacing,sLtil] prij,vidconcMillard LLS centerline of 1]ic I rail til i other bollards at a maximum spacing of tlu-ee3 teet to preclude vehicular access. Fire aL:L=L..SS reads shall not he blocked in .hi nixrnner w.ithcnit the apprc}w.al of (he Fire L) 1)ar1tt eut, 1'ciliCtiw4 L1pC and = iJci, stx'iping shall he placed on bollards. Bol]ard shall be placed 1(1 IL:e', $rots! ;Ilk. :,avc:cI eclr,L~ cif roadway, ... I,apter 7 ;;L,'ceZ, ti .crict.is CITY Y Ot' SPOKANE VALLEY STREET STANDARDS 7.7.5 ROA DW AY RA RR1CADES Temporary and permanent barricades shall conform to the rf c Conirul-dk 'eety-EMUTCD-}. Type III ba u rice des (see Standard plan R-142) 42) shall be used at the end ot:t local access street terminating abru.plly without cul-de- sac bulb or on temporarily stubbed off streets. Each such barricade shall be used together with an end -of -road marker and signed future street extension. 7.7.6 ENTRANCE (A'L'ES Entrance, gates are pruhibitcdr4.ist-all el on public- streets. Use of entrance gates on private streets requireprior approvJlishsltbe-appruved by the City and the Fire l)epar irnent_ Minimum gate opening width shall bei 20 feet. Proposed gates shall he € lear[y shown on the street plans. If a center island is used as part of an entrance- gate feature, a rnininium 14 -foot wide Ia:ie between face of curb and center island shall be provided. The Gunter island s-iall not extend past the end of the gate when it is fully opened, (fated streets require a queuing area to allow vehiu]r:s to exit. the conne,uling street prior to the. gale. The queuing length shall be a minimum 0[ 35 feet plus the gale width. Parking 3haill he pm!,;I itedi. et aIr.,wed within the queuing area, on either side of _he street; for a distance equal to the queering length_ Signage for the "No Parking Z011e shall he placed on Ixth, sides of the gate, {.fates shall he required to have a Fire Department enicr-gency acc;bss device installed and maintained: a. 4 Knox key switch shall be installed on gates that provide access to 20 lots r les: or, b, An Optic€rm gate activation device shall tic provided ft r subdivisions with ii€re than 20 lois. 7.8 APPROACH DESIGN C'RITERTA The fur][+ wing :section contains design criteria for intersections and driveway approaches. Tlles: arc !nn]tli1ulil r4417_!rler;lel71S and may be modified It:traffic volumes (exitrr3g and/or projcete(I), topography. Icsirn speed, design vehicle i .gtiir nielrts, drainage, find ofricr condi( tori s, both cx.istinL and projected iltC] iC' ? tc a 1r1G; e stringent, critGrl oil i s r'u2 c scar y. `l 1rti Cite may t'egLiirc additional provisions tc) cnsuz'c public safety. All access points to and from City streets, including irrt' sec:iions and dr'ivi vat's shall be approved by the City orior to construction and require an approach perrnit. 7.8.1 APPLICABILITY These -equirremerits apply to all new or aliened intersection and driveway approaches to (. its• trcet;_ Ail, ted DeCallL3zr:'Utr`3 ChaptcrStrcxt Eluncats 7-23 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY .5110..:icr STANOARDS 7.8.2 ACCESS I,i.M.ITATIONS a. h: le- no properly is denied access to City streets, direct street acne -ss is not guaranteed. When direct access is denied, properties may be requited to: i. Access the street throt[ Il an alley; ii. Share a single driveway approach with two or tlnore contiguous properties; or, Rcstriet access with a right-ii1:'ri;,ht-out apprnac;, r;. r p1opertie:-: located on arterials and with no available friteindte Additional I'', , [I-uf se properties may b: re LEired to construct street inll_'r,-,',.e.,1?L nts to 1 rec rude left turning traffic. h. Properties shu11 betwe restricted to one access point on arterials and two access points on local access structs. 14O Dcv'.. - -r after Traffie-EnRincerinu, may grant one 4ditioiaal arte-'ial access point provided that: i- Minimum Npacing rr;yuirerrtents between access points are met with any driveway approaches. ii. I'he applicant demonstrates that additionaI access points will rec111t in an improvement Lo safety or tittflic flow both on-site. and ort -site; and, One of the following situations exists: 1. The PM peak hour t'II I1:4. 4 I* i W.1 P'':1 ;ink: Four vehicles -on both directions; or, 2. Traffic volumnes using fins'.. ';1'I'S`t' •.7''','•i '11',1 c-vicevCl the capacity ofa Stop sign r.C!?5l1'C']4r''i� Ir}tei .'_`..t;illi i 11;'i '�, *11 P.A.peak hour: or, 3. The ADT ,. i:r one :l;ii'v5',r< ';^,'ot.id exceed 1,000 vehicles both direetiotss. L .TyVhen La property has frontage on two or more streets, and spacing req uirernen is un the major sircct cannot be met, the dri 'e ;,-iv approach shall be located on 1.110 NLrcet with the lowest classification ttuicss safety considerations dictate oLherwi . d- For 1 di['cloprric-rEt that combines more than one iI !derl ing lot, these including the. [LLILrrbCI' and s1'xaCin.;2, of 7c'. ess points, shall apply to I,r : e....t-lopmenL as a whole, not to urach um]crt.'ing tot. e. E- 'r uh Binding Sito C'[L:1L.3. cx-ILltlttl.c Endus.trjsit 7orie.5, sharer{ access shall Ise- requires] heti*c�cn the lois. The shttrc:il access :halh include parking lot travel lane- c:c>nnccEic;ns or sheared drive •,a>: approach. It the Applicant de LIatel_', det-L':c:l;istrates a site design of building List: tin 11tiit100 10i' installation of the travel tem or NI -Laved approach on the existilng property, exceptions to th regLLir :1i1Unt niay l)c adrninisirative.ly 14..i (a c', Exceptions 171.1y. be approved }t a er-2101 L,h.arler 7,—ShrctP1ct ell:r - 24 CITY OF SPOKANE L STkl:.I I A )r'\I r)Si The City -finds that the lack of shin c.d Ktccc:ss docs riot negati';veIy impact the present .rr tonne function and safety of the parking lot circulation,. ingress/egress, or roadway network; and, ii, The City finds that the tots required to share access have allowahle incompatible uses; and, The property does not have a feasible alternative site design solution. t. Driveways not Ile allowed where horizontal or vertical curves prevent rhe roadway from having continuous stopping sight distance or adequate intscetion sight distance to safely accommodate the movements in and out of ilae driveway. N.3 CC'1 4E1ULDESIGN Approaiylaes shall he constructed Lo avoid interference with existing drainage inlets, t'LI[vc'r'ts, lighting, utility holes, traffic regulating devices, lire hydrants. or other l.aci]ities. TIic ; pF)lic mt shall he responsible for the cost of relocating any of the above. The agency holding authority for the particular structure shall decide how tlIc facility will be relocated. which may require 4pprov. l t,l•the Cit) if -a( the time of construction the fronting street does not have lull width pavement syr curb and gutter, a rural driveway approach may bo used with, the approach starting at the edge or the existing pavement (sea:- b Standard PIar s 4), Approaches shall not restrict or impo and drainage flow in the street. For shouldeJ-t;d streets With ditches, storonwater shall be conveyed under the driveway with a culvert. The minimum culvert size shall be 12 inches, For curbed roads, stcsnnwALer shall be conveyed using a culvert and. St.andar4 Plat R 11.4 or an inverted approach pursuant tee r11e Standard Plans-14-1-14. IT an C .istiing approach is to 4)e altered nr abandoned, the, unused portion of the original approach slrallls4o be removed and replaced with curb, gutter and sidewalk. matching that which is adjacent. RcdcveIopni ._1t protects shall be required to mocl Fy or eliminate any existing ciri�c a_ ; atpproLicb that does not conform to these standards.. ^. .4 URI\'1. W'AY APPROACH HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL GRADE :• I}I_ r,:..:tabes shall align perpendicular to the street. The angle of intersection to the t.�. shall not be less than 75 degrees- `Ilio angle may be reduced to 45 degrees 1-61-.44-in/right-out driveways where the entering and exiting [ones are separated by u raised "pork chop" eland (see Standard Flan R. -I F 5). The vertical grade of approaches shall iacrt exceed 8 percent within the right-of-way and shall bc designed to preclude 'vehicles dragging when entering or exiting the site. V. itieal grades shall not exceed 10''';i-pief .ent within leftlil feet 'Attie right- of-way Otelepted t cc,:i,lbcr 3009 Chopin 7-- Strett Cleoir sas .; C1TY OF SPOKANE VALLEY STREET STAN 13AR)S 7.8.5 APPROACH WIDTHS The total approach width shall not he greater than 501:. -percent of total lot frontage width. When approaches are constructed different than that shown on the construction plans, the design engineer shelf verify that inv impactc(h W t street and storrnwatcr facilities will still meet the desitnt raluironentsgeals. If the facilities are inadequate, measures shall he taken to bring t he facilities into compliance prior to their acceptance. Driveway approaches shad be dcsiurncd pursuant to the Standard plans. R 412. 7.k.52 R sid iir�i-PI4YttI Approach for private streets shall match t4+c r; pktitLement width and =hall be per Standard flans R 110 and R 112. ommercial1Jaidustrial Commercial/industrial drivt y- pt-oetches shall be par Standard P1;tns 110 through R 112, 11ig]i volume driveway approaches (Standard Man R -1 13) may be required nr permitted when all of the following conditions are present: a. I he access is located along an arterial; b. Access ss volumes indicate a need for a radii curb return where the ADT exceeds 500 or where speed change lanes would he inquired; e. The access is designed to restrict turning movements, requiring the. installation of an access island or center median; d. The roadway has no curb and gutter; c. The c1ceess serves an industrial property, or provide (r ctmtnrereial deliveries, wvhc.re.. large truck movements are required; and, i'. A traffic engineering 7« IVsi submitted by the applicant determines that a radii access is nner29s;-t,'v tt) ensure adequate Lala sally and operation. 8.6 I)R11' I''1 '.0Y APPROACH O,', -S11 E LAYOUT Approaches shall provide' .7.1ec:c4 ._n cif--wtrce. ;,t ,cine tn. I..at�.k v11 property. ' ..hc driveway ch;,,ii a a.cliic"L' ill 11..: i.:r'1`:'4�'• `' ' does nt:L project into the ri ,11I -t i- .t_,, side'+.:z!k, . •Lr•pioa::!.' s and un.. site parking shall be designed such that vell!v!, lt,..Lin r I ...Urr.cr; Will nuL occur into thestrcetfpublie right-of-way, impede l elle- r > avice..,; to sidewalk or vehicles in the public street. Driveway approaches sh .; 1 he designed to allow Lhc [august typical vehicle awing Lhc ;approach (Lc% tractor toilers at large warehouses, deli very Chtiprcv 7—SIrerri Memel fil'OYANE VALLEY STREET STANDARDS trucks at mini marts. etc.) 10 enter and exit t -ie site without encroaching into opposing traffic" WI—i ncv.t.r }7':. ssib . thc site should he desi ned f:7r counterclockwise circulation of large tr"LLti1.w t w I. .[i'"]I a!:L1 1:;1 :.' lir1 t:.i=l;trit maneuvers are easier and stilfursintx: the Ct;'15: J' ;;(?4;I",(j!'. I ;11! ill I':`'I litl!' i of the ve1ir•=ie ,SII parking, loading and maneuvering or. trucks x111111 Lac cunduered ,gin privFite ]-ir pertv. Driveway Stacking Length for Multi-u"st Properties Driveway stacking length for inulti-'.ise pr4:'perties is the distance Lctwcc.n the right-of-way and 1.114 nr 1J'.side pi' r11 ri1 St inteI' ecti11g illti;l'i':lr ttislo or parking space. TLIedriv'i:..',7y siacl irrg length ;r r Mkt lti-use LlrrlpertiC.s shall h ani follows; a, 20 Feet for parking lots with Less thEul 50 Space.; b.. 50 feet fbr parking lots witl:l rip to 200 spaces; and, s. 8() fact for parking lot., with .7.ver 200 spaces. 7,8.6,2 Llirivervity Stacking Length for Siirtg]c-Inst Properties Drivewuys1 ic:1, !}:t; length for single-Llse Iirt:+;:' rtivs is the distance between the right-of-cv,; , Land the proposed uses. I I".L 111 r.ileum length for driveway -:,tr ::kinLZ for :1r v'e-tbr'li wiridowF. ;h_1.1.1 he a. .50 telt tt?1' drive-in ban lid and di iti't:-thru Jed tirilJ[L; b. 50 tet for autoivated tel It' (A l M) and drive-incicanors. and repair services; 7S feet for automated car wash arid espresso stands; and, d. 160 fee. :::011 tr011(A E L:eels ',_trying. rhe CityIlia , 5c`til!t:l :', I.' fiC'. w=L14I`, ''.i c1+v;el"rrtllic' '.]It' .';tc.1: i!'. F111L1 queuing I"egi iretiletlts 1''I" such LIQ.:;;; Ella( I1 1' .i"I'.` x'41 tl!'L'. :!".'I Irl",Itef to, service stations. drive-thrtt 1 he City may requit y4'.4' `.`, its. I11,4J,11.,1 it „t `I .ongcstion to designs ppr allies with Ioi- I;'i't''?4" Ic."i='.I'i to to avid impactirie. City streets. 7.8.7 CORNER CTF.''i R.&NCE FRR()'.1 i \ I 1 I Si":CTLONS The full:?','.'it ti'+:ll;''li i'i<.''r l"1ti liil :l!1LUJli L: +".1G!' G13S!J'#yrlve Greater corner clearances may he rod ui:c' :-1 ' ie ':.lia:'1.ri'.>rt '_it the City" lx:ined on existing cit proposed condition ttt ti's_. Ilii l':':.:..t14}ri- I„ !_".`i!t:.'ill, full Recess driveways are not ]1lrrwec k\i''hi11 the I_;roct, ; . ,.:I.cascctilii: hound,'" y:llicl-i can 1}e in1Flimally defined by the length or the turn po kcL ., Leri rii,iy extend further from the intersection. Where the driveway location dots not tricot minimum City criteria, or where a safe drivewgo I+:JcaLic;n cannot. tic. round, Lbe City may requires, reasonahlee.ppmpriate mitigation irnei.SLtres t'.7 provide Ifs, as sale a driveway as feasible. 7-'7 Cham 7 — Strut Elcmcnts CITY OF SPOKANE 'VALLEY 8TRJ:I I' Si ANDA 11)!; Family Residential drikeway ,tppruachcs may not be loealcd closer than 15 feet -!.(oiii the ]ximt of curvature of a curb return. t:,:rmmgrciarl/IIIdustrial. Ycimrnercial driveway approaches may not be located closer than 75 feet the point of curvature ora curb return. 7.8.N DRIVEWAY! APPROACH SPACING SAME SIDE OF STREET 'Table 7.8 provides the minimum distance allowed between the centerlines drivewayapproaches. The ciistatice.isincasuredfrom centerline appro,atsh. TABU', 7.8 - DRIVEWAY APPROACH SPACING Q.TRF.FT Ci-.11')SIFTCATION DESLRAI3r:I? CONDITIONS SEPA A`I'tON (P1') I.IM] I IN(; COMA SFPARATION(FT) Collector 70r 50( i4']iriti,��l` :Arterial 90, 60 Principal Arterial 120 80 condition, .I,:,II be applied when s.+[l_it.Eer t space ticntig0 I avaii,J [e. if sufficient sp,,ict: or street Ijuurt ge i r desirable conditions is riot avail;.!b[e, then lesser down to, but not less than the requirement tk r liiui 1iv conditions, iii.t. 7.8.9 DP_iL\ E\\ AY .'.PP'f-xl ('II \1F I I HMS [}I<' NIRASUREMLNIS I)r i' [:},.`.t_. i7 . 4;1 5 ;4i'I i4.:,:t°.;,urge] perpendicular to the centerline oft}ie. driveway ay by the r., .ii _ ..trg[h r or not that occurs in.sidc the property ,es and - r1 _.`' _.: ly marked curbing. is eu+ri_, 1!.. -.,.oat length is measured ttl rng the centerline of the driveway from the !4 edge of the driveway apron and the nearest vehicle aisle or circulation road. I iitiiensions in this section rtilbr to disttrticcs froth (cir along) t .ce of curb. in the 1,s =Iice I' curb_, the measurement is considered to be frotn (or along) the edge cif [' :,t'rn: nt 1a.illes arc Il'iC'.w.A.tl'{.1 bet 'c;;r! the dri'vewa `centerline and centerline of the roadw,3\.. 7.8.10 RE.S1'111CT 1) ACI:V_SS I)IIIV1`.:'x.- Ys Restricted access approaches cif.) not _7[1t:.'' left -hallo., ruins out of or into the driveway approach, Development C'r' ?ecILveio invent tit properties, where the x.i.._k4I nw.... t. - 2009 Ch Np!cr 7 —,^ Irtet rlernenbi - 2k CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY S [TI:.I?:1" 4I AN:).Ai: I -)S. iat: intersection cannot I.tie aeliieveti in any direction arid �� iih4 ri:01.r!.r ; , t.: , cess the site, ni.t b r'. quirell lu use ,i rt:srl'ict :tii access tlri,',.:we:,, 111 some cases a raised median May be required clown the street CI1L rii:le. Restricted access approaches halI on!:, Le allowed when, approved by the City. E lie cx.is[cnc,c• of other approaco,_w in 1;.r' l i._i";._, 1IIatL do not meet standards 1s not ground` EH" allOwlri ' IL!I �1ZC'ri' s;Jhstand ic._I arE;i'al'rits :l' :s. 7. i.1 I AL1(;•E MF:N 1 Of CROSS -STREET 1)12134/ KWAY APPROA F)lES Driveways should be placed directly opposite From coach other whenever possible. IC this is not possible and (adequate left -turn :s, >,.r ,,. w.ir}c',ciLy is not available in atL amcc of euch driveway, combining ofdript,'..x, urs :lie srirric side of the street may be required. he requirement above shall not apply ifthe s'.rteL to be accessed has a permanent median and/or tratlie control device that prey e7rts any cross-strcct movement of traffic s: -r if the City determines that adheri ri g to said requirement would be uiisale, 7.8.1.2 SIG hlALI!i41) DRIVEWAY Y APPRO CI1ES If the impact Analysis determines dial there is or will be a need to signalize pr'opostd access points, tlieo proposed access points s:lt;I[ be talir'1i:ci directly opposite any existing or proposed access points. or .1'-irlrc:rsec:tiun :,cross tike street, Where dri eways are to he signalized, a minim um spacing of 1,320 Leet to any other signalized intersectiiori, should he maintained or shall be spac=ed as approved by the ('ity. R.ounciatbuuts may be considered as an alterative option by the City, 7.833 A ITROA CH LS ON STATE HIGHWAYS This section contains specific access standards t"ot stats highways within the City limits, which are classified as managed. access facilities. Matta.ged access is based on the pre nisc that access rights of al property owner are subord triate to the puhl i ° s right and interest in a safe and efficient highway system.. Pursuant tolln iec irdan.ce with ROA,' CzhapLer 47.50 RC W, the City adapts by reference, the provisions of WAC Cehapier 468-52 WAC. as adopted Or amendtdi.etiethor with all future .'iiiiendm.era s, in order to regulate and control vehicular access and connection points of ingress to and egress from, the State l lighway System within the incorporated area areas or the City-Erpoddtetne Valley. State Routes (Sid) within the City include SR -27 (Pines Road) and SR -290 (Trent Avenue). 'Me current access classifications for SR -27 and SR -290 are shown in I able 7.9, - llopL 4-Deeet cx 200') C.h+ to 7 - Strtd. l:lcr�iecyrs 7-29 CITY 0.1" SPOKANli VAI.1.1.1` s 1 I&EET STANDARDS F `.') i :Vile ROI 1'1 C'LASSIFIC'ATIONS TA fi_ Ill (,+'u \IN(; •1'“)1.:11.-: 1...'I:.1 t?(1ti' IA DiI.,,Li N111,L:110ST AppRo .IMfr1`fI•: LOCATION Ctil(RENT AC(.:ESS CLASSIFICATION 2.7 8.+.14 84.61 14'111 1'0 CITY LIMITS M2 27 84.6.1 86.49 I4' TO -- ORA M5 27 86,72 87.70 MONTGOMERY r0 290 M5 290 1 .M 6.35 FANO 1ER ITO ARG(1)NNE M5 290 6.35 10.29 ARGONNE TO PROGRESS.:orr M4 1i).• ik.. 12.84 I 4 PI (}GR1; S TO ( :ITV 1.1M1 ITS M2 7.9 TPA a C" CALMING Trf it ic. calming. devices improve neighborhood livability by reducing the speed and iliip ' .[ of v(:thic,r][a]° tri-ric syn residential streets. 7.9.i NEW DEVEL(.1l'IMi':r The internal local ttcccss sirect ],..r,r.t 11:71! he desiigned Io discour_ e tilrough high-speed traffic or shall iu t ~?.}rt;tc. r. ttic calming devices in the c!Ls T1tc Applicant may utilize one; or _ c.f '`,t' t;;et`iC calmingdeviceti. devices shall he reviewed and Lipprt}5rct ; by I:1K Ciry at the time or prcii��:i Ott:_. 4l 'xi review, Traffic calming devices shall be installed at the expense of AptpIil-t]rt4, 7.9.2 EXISTING DEVl I,OPM :N'T 'rrafficcalming dcviccs are pf°oItibitednot allowed on ztrLcrktls. RIH] eollcc.t5:�i's and local access streets, traffic calming devices are only allowed when whrranr.ed b ' ,in engineering study crnd approved by the City. The installation of de lees shall c neighborhood—funded. 7.93 TR A ITIc'CALI'lll\:pDEVICES C.t rrun[]y, the only trartic calming device allowed by the City is rFrat is ('ircle (sec SLanclirrd Plan T-101 j_ AIterrtati e Lie\ iccw ruccdiitta.rrded hv the .A pill leant' s Engineer may be permitted with (`itv approval. x .,n_t c r,..:.e b..r 2(N Chapter 7 Street Dements CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY STREET S'I'A N f )A [R I ) T1JIS PAGEE, IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Adopted I)za.uihcr 2009 Chapter 7 — Strout E1crnGnLti 7-31 (TIN 01: SPOKANV, VA11.1Y STR I :.I STANDA RDS CHAPTER 8- PAVEMENT DESIGN Chapter Organization 8.1 Introduction . 1 8.2 Street Classiliuntion 1 8,3 Street Pavement and Suhgrade 1 8,3.1 Travetways En Residential Zones 1 8,3,2 TrEN:21.ways En Non -Residential. /ones 2 8,3,3 S.Jtade Preparation 2 S 4 1-°,i1!..,lneftd Pavement Paraineten 3 raffle Parameters 3 8.1.2 Reliability Level 4 8,1.3 Ovem II Swridatd Deviation 4 8»iA nitial and Torminal Scrviceability Ink.xes 8.4.5 Structural Layer Coe111iS 4 8.4.6 Drainage. Layer 4 8.4.7 Subgraide Evalualkin. , „ . 5 8.5 Report Submittal. . 5 8.6 l'.,,ilaterials Spec..lications 5 8.6.1 Gravel Ba 5 8.6.2 Crushed Rock 6 8.6.3 Asphalt or Concrete Treated Base 6 8.6.4 Hot Mix Asphalt 6 At-14v44-De4eothiff-2444.4 Chaplet 8 Pavernecit Desisp 8-i CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY STREET STANDARDS 8.6,5 In-place inl ine Asphalt Compaction 'Fest lequirements 6 8.6.6 Col.rl.lc..int Requirements .... ... 7 8,6.7 Longitudinal .FInd Transverse Joint Requirements 7 8,6.8 'I'ack Coats — Preparatinn of I Sting Surfaces 7 8.6.9 (...r.)ver Asphalt Loads During .1rmiport... „.—.. ..... 8 8.6J0 Breakdown Rolling Maximum I -ern peratu re 1 8..6.1. I. Asphalt Temperature Plaernent R.cquirements 8.6.12 Paving Dates 8.7.. Wal[i:i LiLniTn.9 I ,ist of Tables 8.1 Equivalent Single Axle Loads l'al)ft: 8.2 Initial and 'Terminal Serviceability Indexes 4 L1b1,2. 8 .3 Structural Layer Coefficients 4 ' I 'all I e L4— Recommended Drainage Coefficients . 1.31)1e 8.5 — Moduli Ratio., 'Fable 8.6 — Performance Grade 6 T.able 8.7 — Recommended Minimum izydown Temperature 9 A.#4144e4-DE,Eotwkbeir-204.N Chapicr 8 Pliwincnt 1)ciori CITY OFSPOKANE VALI.MY STIR I.:Ii1 SJ NDARDS 8.1 INT ODUC"1' O This chapter provides the minimum requirement for the design of pavement sections for t.faiml.wrilts-stre.its within the City. The use of these desi.gii criteria will ensure that paved transportation corridors aro ir1 ..hove[ in a uniform and consistent manner. The requirements tareserrtc:d i11 r;:.= ,~-",liter have been estahtis]ied to minimize structural failures in slrec:ts, due to t.'t 1T.Le r''r -}: and/or existing soils conditions. 8.2 STREET CLASSIFICATION All public stivuts in the City ]its+e been classified Using the Federal Functional Classitic tion ; stem - vhich provides a hierarchy from principal arterials to local access sn.eet.s, rt7oilate existing and anticipated bane. Street classilieations c -an be found in the or Spcicarie Valley's cuaTencty-adopted Clnaprehensrie Plan. A street's ela.qification is used to determine the volume and mix of vehicles for which it is d::si ii d, Iii 'rases where a street Lias yet to be desig-Laced a spce;i[ic classification, the anticipated traffic volume should he used. if available. lc;. the City may provide the anticipated daily traffic fctr a sheet- However, the Appliti<;nt may. be requited to obtain additional traffic information. S.3 STREET PAVEMENT >D SUBGRADE 8.3.11 TRAVP L LWAYS 1N RESIDENTIAL ZONES i he requirotnctfts of this section ,7l)pi_, tt-i local access streets, private streets, alleys, and private driveways located in residential 7Ones, For the purpose ofpavement 41esL ii. the eng.ineei hag characteristics acteristics t)f the tittbgraade soil shall be determined through laboratory r testis, .. I,a!riratoi-E' testing eorr.sisting of" C:alilornia Boring Ratio (CBR) testing, Resilient le:sting or Resistance Value; (R -value) testing. may he use(charaeterr7e the subgratie snit tiLLprorting capabi]1Ly. A minimum Arcot section ol'three; heli.es of hot mix asphalt (iIMA) over six.e. inch,.;s )1 properly placed and compacted crushed mock is required for local access streets; private streets, and alleys regardless of native sci..s. .4 TiIiniintirr; pavement section of 2two inches. of H VMA over r six inches of crushed rode i, required for private driveways. A soils investigation is required ler all projects, Hie r . niintim pavement section cannot 'e used for sites with poor subgraidc soils, which itc saiIs that rlleet any of the criteria below: a. 1 Live CBR less than ;three; b. Have. R -values less than. 20; c. Have Mr values less than 3,000 psi; or, ,41-14 ketl-Pvt t!tbrt* 01. c: j'icr ° I'0,e:11r211L DES ...n 8-1 I'11'r' {]I .til'�51Cr'L\ VALLEY STREET STANDARDS d- Are classified as MH, ('L, CH, 01. or peat in accordance; with the. Unified Soil Classification System. When results of laboratory testing indicate that poser suhgracic; soils aro present- an engineered pavement design is required, S u b s LL' Face exp l t era l iUJ is (bar i n gs.'tesi pits) are required for each succtf y to demonstrate tete subgrade soils meet the criteria .above. F..xploration should extend to a depth of at least ~ ;, l::ct below proposed pavement. subgrade. 83.2 THAVEVX-A-2'410N-RESIDENTIAL ZONES Nngineered. pavement design is required ftrr xiniinercial local access streets, commercial alleys. collector. arterials, and arterials. '1'[1 ,c; l cit modal's value can he acquired using the following methods: a. M, testing: Soil samples shall he obtained and serge ? _ a private 1E17. for testing- The proposed street shall have Li minimurll For every 1,000 feet of stret' endear for every i'riaterial +, I111nimum of 4three tests per 71.2 52). b. C'11R testing t,rR-value testing: Soil sanlpk- !-;hall he obidilied and sent to a private lab for tasting. The proposed str et :11i1' 1 have a millirnum of -1-one lob.,-!.ratory test for every 1,000 feet of street ariellor for every obvious change in 1.111grade material (minimum of three' tests per street). A gcoiecluilCa1 engineer ;,hall he retained to provide rlecmmmendaliorls for ti:.c,n`c1ititstts between CBR or 1. -value results and MT values, c.. In-situ testing using it non-destructive deflection Lest inelhod: The Applicant icant shal l obtain approval from the City for the type o Cnon-destraretivc deflection test method proposed, before conducting the testing. it truc(ivc deflection testing, a wluLislical analysis is needed. I'll:. shall kir.: reported by street stationing, Test results shall include a graph csl t]1e resilient modulus values vs. sera:( stationing. The graph shall be inelud .cl in the pavement design report. A ra in i-nurn Strc'Ct sectioin of zl•fiw. inches of }Ely over bsix inches. rf pi pt iI : placed Lute! compacted crushed rock is required regardless of the pavement design resuJLw 11 dus;orilat:tcc with Section li-4 1,3,3 Sl 1111 I I) L<' PREPARATION Prior to placing any street base inaterial, the subgrade shall he rolled and coin riaci'cl tt) a minimum cif 95% percent of the Maximum dry dcnsi ry a deterslli nc D-1557 (Modified Proctor). This degree of compaction shall extend to a cicpL11 o at least one+ foot below pavement subgrade elevation in cut areas. The fill LtnVa3 shall be: corrtpactct1 to at least 95',r percent of the triaxi.t um dry density hawed on ASTMD1557 and V,ST)(11' Standard Spe :ification 2-03,3(14)4; Conlltacting Fant, Einbatiktnents. Method t'. Fill placed inorc than 'mice feet below pavement subgrade elevation slaal I he compacted to at leas) 95"_, -t of the maximum dry density bused en ASTM D1557. 1,I.+I,xt1-I �r1LJt�l' cr `% hapies rd it IIIeJ7l L)esxgt 8-2 CITY SPO ANE. VAT r.PY smut:: 'F A'NI )AiU ) Any strDet section which. cannot be compacted. to the devrec he removed to depth ot'2two feet or to a depth '.x litr4 directec:_ by the Onsite Inspector, and replaced with gr_,nuiar 1371}'S:.;.rt:';I iraG#tt ria1 tlwt can be compacted to at Joist ? {'{i, percent of the maximum density as determined by AS l N4 D-1557, or as directed by the 9 !1site InspeLor_ Prior to placing any sub -base or base .Materials, get} -':e: ti[e tttu!le on t]ie stingradc niay he required if the existing sub.rade is a fine-grained soil f ilifl., CL. M1-1, or C11). 1 he gc lextilc fabric shall meet the criteria in Section 933 for "Separation" of the most eun-c;nt version of the WSDO I',Slaw'rxrt:I Specifications. 11 the material is unsuitable; the soil shall be excavated below grade and compacted per WSDOT Standard 'Specification 2-03.3(3) and 2-03.3(14) Method (' 8.4 ENGINEERED PAVEMENT NT PARAM ETES Engineered pavement designs shall be 1` t! knt t rin tcccrdance with the Incl -,r currem version ref the 93` ASIITO Guide Jo Design of r*auement Sfruclures for flexible pavements and the following criteria: S.4.1 I'RAF+ F I,C PARAMETERS The existing tr{title levels shall he increased to match the projeetcd traffic at the end of the street design life. The minimum design Iifc shall be 2O -gears, `flee growth rate is 1.5% percent for residential :streets and 3.5 for ctminic:eittl/industrial streets and arterial streets. The 1.5N—per e* growth rate may be waived in closed subdivisions Trish City approval. 'h'his growth rate shall only he used I[br pavement design Ii'..+rpn es and shall not be used for traffic analyses_ IIie engineer shall submit i.quivakent Single-ANle I:oads (ESALs). calculations.. The truck 1Lteiors band in Table 8.1 may F'e usect in fhe ai7,:cnce of other information. TABLE E 8.t — EQl:"rVALENT SE GLE AXLE 1:OA1)S \'EHICL[. I I(LC K I-A(:10k I:s/Vt:HI(_LE) School Bus STA Trus 2.117 2.57 Refuse Truck 1_03 AB other trucks (averaged) 0.42 Adepred L} eernbcs 2(109 Chip r . rEfYCITIL71t Den R1 OF SPOKANI. VALLEY STREET STANDA1ir)S 8.4.2 RELIABILITY The reliabi1 : !t .:l ;I 'i I. r r4: i�1 r;'; .! .:��.. �,r_ rr.d local non-resi.dcntial streets is 75'_0 percent, l or all ethc: r.4t c1 is zi.'f t14:r' F. rtrial)ility Level is 90% .perc nt. 8.4.3 OVERALL STANDARD DEVIATION The overall standard deviation (S) is 0-45 ti,.' cop wt:.l: t lr iind 0.49 for overlay project., 8.4.4 II ITI . AND 'FERMI -NAL SERVICEABILITY INDEXES C'lae initiaFi and terminal sery ieeabiIity indexes shall be pct Table 8,2, TAJILE 8,2=— INITIAL AND TERMINAL SERVICEABILITY INDEXES S'l khF°T CLASSIFICATION PS[(INITIALL PSI(TJ1 R MIN .AI:) Private streets, alleys, access street, residenti_tl streets & local nota -residential 4,2 2.00 Col lectc : and minor arterials 4.2 2,25 Principal arterials 4-2 2.50 8,4,5 STIJ(y'1'[J RAL LAYER COEFFICIENTS Struutti al Layer Cociflcicntc (rill For new material stall be i.t7 FtCcordance '1"able 8.3. TAI Lri' 8..-.STREJCT'fi11 I. 1 .\YVV'IZ COEFFJCIENTS '\-'[ATIR IA ti rRu{_TI_-RAL. CO LI'I:IC;I I .N•1 EIIPvI.\ 0042 ['rushed rise'-: 0.14 Gravel. baise 0.10 $.4.6 DRALTAGE LAYER COEFCrI' NTS Drainage coefficients (ml) for crushed rock anti ..graver burse shall be in a.;ccarclanGo }with Table 8.4, This c4-Feffrcienl is used to titoilif zthe strner-rlrayl layn of untreated base and suli_liasin maieriatls in flexible ,pavernen15.. li Ilnllt':'tl information is available regarding clratin{tgc e.o¢rc'silFi'artue nt-0.95 may be used. TABLR 8.4—F1EC:OIvDIEND .li DRAINAGE COEFFICIENTS PERCENT OF TE l: PAVEII£NT STRUCTI11E IS EXPOSED TO MOIST URI'3 I..I' VELS APPROACHLNG SATURATION Quality of Less Than Greater `11-i.tn Drairiaae 1% l-5% 5-25% 25% Excellent Good Far 1.40-1 35 1.3 5-1,30 1.35-1,25 1.254.15 1.25-1.15 1,15-1,05 1.39-1.20 1,15-1.00 1,00-0.80 I.20 1.00 0.8() Chtphor 1PJV1mentEke 3 n S''01.;' NE VALLEY STREET STANDARDS I'c�t,lr Ver.; Pous.1 1.1;W1,£� 1.05-tl.80 0.95_0]-75 (1 80-0.60 0.75-0.40 0.60 0.40 8.4.7 SIAIGI ADE EVALUATION Prior to designing the p '. en] ii[ thickness, the subgrade soil shall he evaln teci aeco.rdance \vith estatblit;li A! :ic rill :','1 tl!.:". The tiilIo\loin moduli ratios (ratio (.it :'wiYllall inoclitli I li11!t':':L ;11':41L!IC'j t41U11C1 irl table g.5 can be tiled (l...'tcrrniri r". ffeetiv2 roa,lbty l't :t;.l' n: ! !knit modulus value. (Mrteii ); TATO,t: 4.5 — MODULI RA 1.10 SAMPLE COLL.p.0 lt...iN PI',RIC.)1) MODDL_f RATIO `inter (;73)41} 1";') 1.00 \ rtrlter& Spring ( 1 .brilary through May) 0.85 Summer (Junk::: through September) 1.00 Fail (October through Dec :lr!her) 0.90 8.5 REPORT SUBMITTAL 'lite Applicant shalt submit a geotechnical report for all sites. The report zh:a,11 and staniped by an nginccr with experience in geotechnical engineering.. L shal I inoltide, a applicable: a. Na]Yative of the site conditions and soil; b. Recommended pavement section c. Site plan showing soil sample locations; cl. Field data; including boring crest pit logs; c, Laboratory testing results, including discussion n of CBRlmodtalus subgrade correlation or Rvahiefniodulus suhgrade correction; and, L Pavement design calculations_ 8.6 MATERIALS SPECIFICATIONS The fol lowing material rcxluircli:L•nls rci'er to or amend the most current version of the WS1 0.1.. ra,eardSpec r7icirri'0aL'. 8.6.1 GRAVEL BASIC Grnvei'iasc shall bc bank run gravel, defined as r aural ly occurringmaaeriatl hawing charactcristics such that when compacted in place €7n the street, it provides a course hawing greater ter supporling value than the sur grade on which it is placed. It shall be l urs! i iii 1- ortl Section 9-0110 of the most c11rtent version ol. the WSDOT Slandar-d S'pecif real leers. d'1�1,.�[I7ir4r 2001' C,IIIINCT 8?}pvi„"nrcnL fl. iIm cit Y 011 SPOKANE VALLEY STREET STANI}AIil)ti 8.6.2 CRUSHED W{}CK Crushed rock used shall fall under the following -two classifications: EI, Cyushcd Surfacing Top Course (CSTC) b. Crushed Surfacing Base Course (CSHC) CSTC and CSBC shall be in accordance with Sr lion 9-03.9(3) oftlte most eun'en t version of the WSDOT .Standard S c flections, including the following modification- The crushed aggregate portion which is retained on Lhc No.. 4 sieve shall odontain not more, than 15% percent, by weight; of flat or elongated pieces as defined in AS11%11 l) 693. The ct'ushed aggregate shall have at least 90%1e-reon by weight of particles with al Icast one fractured face. The area of each face shall be equal to at least 7 79)....;:,f}efetwit of the smallest mid-section area of the piece. 8.6.3 ASPIJA1. r OR C:[}NCRE'1E TREATED BASE When compaction soils type or moisture content precludes proper compaction, asphalt treated base (ATB) or concrete treated have (CM) should be utilized, 844 11(1'1' RIIx ASI'HALT Hot mix asphalt shall pursuant_ iohe in atccr:+et9 cc with the nnst current ers'on ikit of the WSf)().1' Standard Specifications. Pavement design calculations shall be performed by an engineer experienced with performance grade oils ttnd pavement design calculations. Asphalt used ill City street construction shall use performance grade asphalt binders. pursuant Loin accordance with AASHTO Designation MP -l. The minimum bikie, binder used shall be PG - (4 -28. Iteofuirr;rl base binders based on street type and condition are provided in Table S.6. 'rAI3LE 8.6—PERFORIs•IANC E [.:RA1)l''. S' MEET CLASSIFICATION I rERFORM.rlNCE GRADE Local access, private streets, and alloys 64-28 Collectors and arterials 70-28 Aggregate for use in hot mix asphalt shall be Class P2 inch in accordance with Section 9-(03.80) of the current Ycrsion ot'the WSDO'I' S'tanda d Spec:if m/wn.-_ 8.6.5 IN-PLACE MAINLINE ASPHALT CO l'6.1 PAC:1'10N TEST REQUI RIMENTS A lot consists of 31ave random individual tests. Minimatu density testing requirements arc +tune lot per 400 tons of IIMA r r -I nti: lot per flay, whichever results :n the greater number of trots, A lot shall be rejected il; any of the following. occurs; •111 erl-F7evcictrlvl 2+3I19 8-6 Chriprcr R P:i' c irienl Dt!,i�ii c'rry (f^ stzoKANE VALLEY STREET STANDARDS a. The average a:onzpaetion of the lot is leas than 92" fent of maximum density, as determined by WSDOT POP for AAS I'I'O T166 and T209; or; h. Any individual compaction test in the lot is fess than 916(iperet4 or higher _han 96%et of the maximum density, as determined by iSDOT FOP for AASHTO T166 and T209, :Additional[ testing requirements shall he nu nt. toper Appendix 9-A. 8.6.6 COLI) ,fO f N"1' REQUIREMENTS Sc;c:tiori 5-04..3(10)T3 of the current version c)1 -111k2 WSDOT Standard J Sive ,- fi !atrr m .for Road; Bridge, and 1«N tla'tpal ['rrnrt€aretion- 2008 edition -is supplemented as, Ic+1[ow5swtill 4L1ef flowing: it. Extreme care shall lie exercised in the construction of cold joints ti t, r1 stere Thal the joint is properly tacked with a uniform and heavy coating ot" rri approved tacking agent, that the placement of I1MA EL[j Ctsni 11) [Its. joint is properly raked and that the adjace-it hot mix is rolled and cot rtp{a .ted in such a manner so as to cclmplete[y seal the joint. `I°he formation of all joints shall be made in such a mann.et as to ensure a continuous born] betv4•een the courses and obtain the required density. A[I .joints sh.t[] be the ,acne texture as other sections of the course and meet t]ie requirements for smoothness and grade. h. !fin the opinion of'the City, the cold joint has not been properly constructed,. the joint sha[I be sealed with a joint compound sealant pursuant Icer A AS I I TO M 324, at the Contractor's own expense. 8.6.7 LONGITUDINAL AND TRANSVERSE JOENT REQUIREMENTS Section 5-043(121) Joints of the current version .01 the WSDOT Skwdurd ,4 eifi "atioi s for Road, Bridge, and a tict:pal Construction, 20I38 edigen is supplemented . g: a. The formation of all joints shall be made in such a manner as to ensure a rxontinucrts bored between the courses an: obtain the required density. ILLI joints shall be the same texture as other sections of the course and meet. the requirements for smoothness and grade. h. When paving occurs on an arterial street w itlh i n the City of Spin y, cold joints will be limited to the centerline of the roadway and shall be constructed pursuant topt5f Standard Plan R -127 -Step Wedge 1,ongititdinal Cold Joint, A paving plan shall be submitted, to the CityPublic W- +k ; detailing how the. work is to be accomplished. Where possib[ce the Contractor shilllis-rer]trifeel—t-e+ use rnult ple pavers in order In reduce or eliminate longitudinal joints. 8.6.8 TACK COATS — f'RLPARATION OF EMSTING SURFACES Section 5-04.3(5)A, paragraph two ofth e current version of the WSDOT Standard Specifications for Road, Bridge, andMim ielprxd Construction k hcrc,by amended as follows: Atiop,ted L)ci.:lt.tx.r :'.UI'!% 8^� C'hrirrcr !# 1' ,eni.nr ern' (?F ;5F'OKANF VALLEY STREET [ A .I - I ; A lad( coat of asphalt shall be applied to all paved surizt,.. " _or.rrse ,:.( 1111,1 is to be 1 li cd or abutted. Tack coat :,1, 1: 1'. ti11110t1.n14. -applied Lr; eyisting aver ent v..ith a thin film of rusiduttl free of art a3I<w and bora sI)Crt3, The a1.>l Iication rate shat! be 0.02 s.;:, "(43 1Ion. oI-reLalined asphalt pc!. s'.71.1arc y<ti.cl, lithe -;icl: coat has bec n with water, as al[owecl in (hi!, ›4;4:tit,rl. ']icn ilio .,l:i I t^.li.`'i rate in'.41" l c :Icljlisteti in order to ac17im.c° tli: r_ttui:;ccI fair+,autit c :itiCalrarlt required A heavy applicationc5f itr .l ti'+.}.:I �� ii �,,4, • :'1:'.iti.,,] to ^i1 j.:°.i,n:s Thin Ii11i of I};]l'�.mel require li'--Ik'141" it}t".Itiatltrib ui MLR COs.lt to _1;'v'.ellt ral'i"'ling„ }7si11inL. and detain ,_`Crisp., c fisting surfaces1))o17. are coarse. till'" or riitll :cl r'quire ;: r'i'"t c}l I;kti t '.: ti i.i : r I1""r 4 :; ',hat appoar rid or hleffling. 1 .7,r streets : pc.n [t. lrtcl li ..lie apri,1:.=,"pion of tack tic at ,,[tali be e:1 t. wt:rlrices that will 3c paved cl'l.'ingthL 57:-:Ine working lriil. i lr spry t '--_'. �quipmerlt shall be equipped with a t1tc.rilioineter to indicate the cit the tack coat .natei'ial.. 8.6.9 COVER ASI'1{AL1" LOADS [ti[RTNG TRANSPORT Tarpaulin rflMMerial iaa cover asphalli loads during transport from plant to project for all p .:;ct t* s', Tien the ambient €ti•' temperature is 50_F 50 deerces 1-tiahl'en1leit or less, 8'{DOWN ROLLING NLAXIrvIUM T.ENi1t'FRA'I'i'RE LOSS t3reakdnwn rolling shall occur" before 20 -P or greater ten1peraLure Coss of'the mix from tl-e point of Iaycluwn. Temperature for basis shall be that observed and recorded in the Ir11mporl'cliicic. ;t rilr.icofdikch:rr;eto the paver. 8.6.11 ASPHALT' 1 I''nII FEATURE PLACEMENT REQlIIRF,Ivi'LI,N'iS Table. 8.7 shows the minimum [ayi.-lo 'la temperatures and n;!Iirr• time. Vibratory con7pact`sc;rl shall not 47c: usr;cl attr:i" tilt asp1rbelow 175' F. The rolling pattern sliL111 b.' estaI Iisht;tl in conjunction \I'ith isphaIt densis_,' Les ti ng. TABLE 8.7 RECO M\'>IE DEA) 1fl\-11411L-MLAYDOWN °Trn'IF'la,RATLRE t .cl .runcc i i 1 >,''MI ` ti^c,Irthe :\aci,:}n it C . i 1LT for !.sp}itt_1 T'ti :inch les, 1 for \th. Asphalt S' ';iixtiirc. Dt'1: rI kind {..0:1 1 r'Iit -i(rrl eritiberm24.414+J 8 ..1A -i .1 1Ii{'I NII':S ([NCI1F,N) Base 't emr, F V., 314 1 1 ;4 2 ::>3 40-50 31(1 .f,l) 285 275 i 50-60 310 .300 95 280 270 160-70 310 300 290 2 1 275 265 70-8O 300 290 2&5 280 170 265 80-90 290 285 27'5 270 ..3.0D 260 90 2807' 270 265 260 255 Rolling Time (min) 4 ( 8 12. 15 115 t .cl .runcc i i 1 >,''MI ` ti^c,Irthe :\aci,:}n it C . i 1LT for !.sp}itt_1 T'ti :inch les, 1 for \th. Asphalt S' ';iixtiirc. Dt'1: rI kind {..0:1 1 r'Iit -i(rrl eritiberm24.414+J 8 cl'['Y {H SPOT( ANN. VALLEY STREET STANL}, RJ1 2. rime avEilablc biiwucn r orrunended Iaydown temperature and cessation temperature (17:').-9) when attempts to compact the mat should cease_ 3 These compaction tamper Hires are estimates and will vary with different aspilalt cements. and aggrcgatr s. For thin mats, the ttitie available for rolling is Short. For cxanple, a %-incur prat placed at the recommended minimum 1aydown temperature has only fish- minutes to be compacted to achieve. toic tact density. The roller speeds cannot be increased significantly" without adversely affecting dcnsity; hence, additional rollers may be required when paving kit law lern peram I es. _ Suh2radc cannot be i'rorcn. kt. Sub2 ade may I:u rcquircd to be oroyeArd alevendinp s�rl the outside tcnlpirtrture. . CuIiwH ;riuI1, requirements shalta;rast hr met. 8.6.12 PAVING .TIATI LS & WEATHERLII IITATIONS WSUOT Section 5-04.3(16) Weather 1.iui talions is amended as follows; a. HMA shall not be placed on any traveled way between October 1M and April 1st without written approval f orri the City. -041opt-e4-1:eueifatw-20(P). 'Isapi'x 8 Pavement Design LITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY STREET STANDA Itl )S THLS PAGE Is INTENTIALLY LEFT BLANK Mopied Doeculbci. 2009 C1i ptcr 8 PsiwemtrtL Design 8-10 f:ri 1' 01: SP( )IC ANI.: VA1.1.1=;Y STREETSTANDARDS CHAPTER 9 - INSPECTION CElTIFICiTION Chapter Organization 9.1 introduction l 9_2 App Iieahility 1 9.3 Authority to Stop Work 9.4 ResporisikbiIities.,,. 1 9.4.1 Development Inspector 1. 9.4.2 C)rx-.site Inspector 2 9.43 Applicant's Engineer 9.4.4 C'ontracto.. 3 9.5 RiWay Pontius 3 9.6 Pry. -construction Mcctitig 3 9.7 CurssNotification 4 9.7.1 1 Tk)Lices orUpcorning Construction 4 9.71 i T riices car Util.iry Shutdown and Access Limitations..... 5 9.7.3 Notices i.rInspeetion 5 9.8 Plc Id and Lab Testing 6 9.1.1 Reporting.... (ti 9.8.2 Minimum m Material Testing Frequencies 6 9.11.3 E ield '1'esiing and Lab Requirements (i 9,9 Required 9n peeLions 6 9,9.1 1.;rasion and Sediment Inspections 7 la pd atco ? &nu aiy 2017 9-i Chapter 9 -inspection & Certification CIT). OF SPOKANE VALLE Y 5.1.1.::NN 1 i AN DA RDS 9.9.2 -Mil ir.y Inspections 7 9.93 111,.A inspeci.lons 7 9.9.4 Dr1,,iu:age. StrLK:ttire Inspections 7 9.9.5 Di wale and Drainage FadInspections 7 9.9.6 S i,vakt irtspoiliori During Warranty Period 8 9.10 Miscellaneous 8 9.10.1 Chan Lres 'During Construction 9.10.2 Constructi n C'ornplaints 9 9.10.3 Conflict csolu lion 9 9.11 Final Walk- Brough 9 9,12 Record 1)inay.:ings 9 9.13 Project Certification 10 9,13.1 (.'ertification. of -Drainage Facilities 11 9.14 PcrlOrrni.,:r,ce Surety ... 11 9.14.1 Per;..'ci.mrce Surety Authorized 11 9.142 Performar_ce. Surety it.:riteria 4 1 1 9.143 Pot.formauee Surety Release „ 12 9.15 Wan -Linty Surty 9.15.1 Vai-rLiLlv Sunr..rArnctTrt .„ 17' 9.15.2 Aca7p1Li FA(' Sureties 12 9.15.3 Warranty Donation 13 9.15.4 TiLTLC Frai: les to Complete Repair_ 44 41 4 3 915.5 fai lure. to Complute Repair ........ ......... ....... —...... 13 9.15.6 Responsibility for .Maintenance 13 .9,16 Si 17:sita1)lishi11ent.. 1.1.4 13 List of Figures Figure 9-1 Typical Sign 5 List of Tables l'aMe 9.1 Requinz.d Sign Infortriation. 5 I ,is! of Appendices Appendix 9-A - Minimum Material Testing Frequencies 16 Appendix - Final Curiirteation Checklist- Sample. 17 Appendix 9-C - Removed Appendix 9-D - Erosion zind Sediment Control Log 18 Updniud JHRLLEIFy 20,17 c -ii Chupter 9- Enspedice Sz Certification. CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY 111•:1': I .i 9.1 INTRODUCTION [tes: ecti::1i ]'equity I [Cir1Ftc. 0i1.51.r'uGl.ia1 L}1 1 lkfal,lic: Irbil I)riV,lc {tiffets ,ilCey{ dr1Viw ays, and Ltti1i V !s.71)}1'\:..CL IC'ntS. \}aii( 1' and sewer LJL1LiS[r't1(;lion S1}t`l1I ;7I*', he monitored I)\ Lie E' acL i purveyor and 'or agency of sysl'. nr ownership. The (Icy of Spokane Valley's construction certification process is based (in the project umstnicL!oii eertiflu tion [,1LI]1id in die PJY7eEd3d1v,C' 7f.J".D1. 7n'i i s ±'f{'Jfcri, : .[)HI 2002 Spokane {'c:'un:y Department 0E. Public c''o 1. ,,_�;. [ ... �n ,".: i' ctal Council of Ern -4i ocL:ririL. Companies of Wash in4ton {a sLll)ec,1:7111ittei ."...0 ";'tii Lhs: So."Ixonc Count.:,. Construction Ceitication t:omrrlittee) developed that di: eLxmer1, 9.2 APPLiCABILITY The following project,. r:4 oire construction certili _ui'rr1, a, New {;('.115 IL1 1 itl;'i :' public 3tieets; b. New cens(rLL.:tion of private. streets; c, -New eun5trttc lion of crr inccrcd driveways; 1. Frontage improvements on public streets, inclucrng pavement widening, curb and gutter, sidewalk., and drainage improvements; at c1, e, Swalcs and dryweils. 9.3 AUTHOR1TY TO STOP WORK 11i [)ti}.L":]crprrera inz,pector has the authority to l,[;. i.v l`Ic of the following situations r deist= a. Th t=:c.;tr{ts;tur i.3 5:'r}rkir1 without ft t',71it1 perm ft; b. The Coritratctur is executing 95'liL not ]I1C11Jt C;; iii the zpproved pians: c. Roquired inspections and tests are not being performed; d- Test results clo not meet required specifications; and, c. Construction activities have the potential to adversely impw.'t public or private property or human lite. 9.4 RESPONSIBILITIES 944,1 DEVEL INSPECT°R I he Development Inspector is a City employee and is responsible for: a. Coordinating with and reviewing submit_tls from the On-site Insp tor(s); 1!prrated Jt kte1-?&i 9-1 ChirpLGr 9- ir,pciioir & (:erLilicalkm CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY STREET STANDARDS b. Perforating development walk-through on private and public Ntreets for _Fcceptance and surety redactions; P ev iewing and accepting certification packages. Aproject cer1ificaEionwild :t;Tht be accepted if regi i red frequencies frlr testing are riot met or test results. _lo not meed specitic.atiot3s; d. Reviewing quantity estimates. for performance and warranty sureties; e, Perform* final inspections of public stTeets for surety relekise and street STA E71 i sliment: and, ;. Inspecting .wales located in Forder easements and/or right -o1 -way for 51;10.2. 7rnll_r dwellings and duplexes prior to issuing a eordifictr[c of ccupancy. 9A.2 ON-SITE INSPECTOR l'he Applicant is required to secure the services. LI ' an Ori -site Inspector for i]l projects recriiring certifiicaticrn- '1iie On-site Inspector is responsible for: a, Preparing weekly reports; li. Ensuring that plans. and specifieations are followed: c. Inspecting paved rireis. curb and guider. sidewalks, :ipproachh.e:, drainage improvements, ttnd Liu lilies within iiiriclir o]_ Hrid border easements, I'he ()n -site inspec,ior shall be prescni as all LiinL for H +L'\ plHeerrrent, any trench work within the streetptilm- aryl for dr'•wc'l] in:,lr�ll,:tis }rr: d. Coordinating required testing dnd frequc:,ncics (see AppeuiliK 9-Aj.; e:. Monitoring trafficcontrol; lli''.` 11'rr�:';.I'1` , _ 11.L! , ;?!iC] '.i7 NI-1,;ug signs were iflSt]lied at the Ilk..:•axis; and, 11 I'D._I wring Lion package. 9.4J AilliCANT'S ENCLNLER The Apl icant's Engineer is an I.sri ineer; as defined in the Definitions, hired by the Applicant. The Applicant's En irieer provides required project modifications that occur during the cox]s11410 JUG "',:' :t'. :;. o_,' ,;I , I ,' ati ng with ll the Contractor and obtainiiig City approvd. when siguiricallt modifications are required_ Contiic.t.s arising due do concenis regarding project design or constructability, whether surfaced by the Contractor, On-site Inspector, or Development Inspector, shall he ;del:'' ssc4i by the Applicant's T ngineer.. The method of addressing Lhe 9-) Chapter 9- Inspection & Ccur]ticntior, CITY OF SPOKANE \r LL EY STREET STANDARDS concern s11aII be confirmed by the Development inspector with s}pec:Hie follow-up oversight by the On-site Inspector, 9,4,4 CONTRACTOR The Contractor is responsible [ lr; •''° 1 ienciin!. the pre -construction n1ce.Litlg; [7 all licenses, bonds and insurance information at the pre- ? .'.rLlCtiu[t inc .ting; c. L. n [ruction notiiieat.iott in accordance with Section 9.7: d. Riving knowledge of the testing fiequeneies and constrttcticrn items . v\ I airing inspection (sec Appendix 9-A); �.. Noriij'ing the On-site Inspector and Development inspector, as applicable, prior to Llrc placement of curls[ruutiO11 heats requiring inspection, °::'oITLp]et ing all improvements in aecordarace with the approved pkm.s; and, to r ecting deficiencies, as Identified by the Ori -site Inspector, the Development Inspector, or the applicant, 9.5RIG AV PERMITS F i .lr.-e:.-°•v iy minas Lir • required lor 11 work in the pu'lliw. riL,Jlt-1:t-way, tirm or corpUls,1i.::.l ,11,11' cco::.ni.::lice work or permit any other person, -firm O1 corporation to 11;t::O;]: ii';ICtiOrl, alteration.. repair` >r removal, cutting EinrlFor° r1:1Vfr1 }. of ttirv` xlrect, al icy L)1" other public place rpt 0}iC C]iy without ilrsi fir?talrlll]S7. L W1'117er1 of -way t;onstrii.;tioli perinit and approved plans Ji-oui tilt: City. The Applicant shall secure the services of an Ori -site Inspector before securing ;1 right-of- way construction permit for atiy given project requiring certification. 9.6 PRE -CONSTRUCTION l °WF1'TTNG A prc-construction ]11;'L i[1;;; 'S cequired ['r 1ti ii:?I]owirg2 projects: a. Subdivisions; b. Short subdivisions: c. Binding site pial[] ; d_ Commerci5 1 projects with f:omit c j11d1oi' 1111 St-ee[ ii11] iveta1e11LS= and. e, other pp.liCC.tti which the l';L4' LleeIli4 S pre-C[]114L°'LLc1L[:n 111ec[imz. 14 required. i11 lire--cons1rttc!io ii meetiii 1%d -rail bo held mini [o tom nitii ir[ work. 1 lit purpose of arc pre -construction 111:etinr is to discus proieeL c')r:CCrlts or issues, construction LLiLi[IC.atio requil°emen!:; ;hid cer[i I ictt'rion proeodures. 113[: ripplieanL's Ent irtrt'r, Contractor, fit°.i A and concrete siabcontracrrir°s_ Development Inspector: and On-site Inspector :ire required to attend chive meeting, A pre -construction mee(ing will not be, hc.Id Je;pdated4enuat244 7 j ; Chapter 9- rnspccti en C.t`T'Y fir' SPOi(ANI. VA I.i.l'.Y r`I I:F: i S i , nii )ARr) if the Cantrautor, paving and corm -etc subcontraotors, and/er theOn-site Inspector € re not pre sen L. The.: Comrwaetor shall bring a properly planned and coordinated project schedule to the pre - construction mcctir g. 9.7 CONSTRUCTION NOTTFTC, TTON 9,7.I Ni()1'ICES 01? UPC() kiIN .; ON I I t,C; 11ON Construction warning signs shall be scc+31'clyy pc: te ci 48 days prior to construction of shin subdivisions, subdi.vis c. s or any aiect with street construction. Signs shall b; -placed at a1"- iri resses to lltc 13r.,}IL :!.:It'.:;;. aild shall be clearly visible Froin the tight -of -way, i 9-1, The (.'ontraktl",r shall notify then De,velopfnent Irrspcctur within 24 hours of intitallnig the 5igr1(s). 'The signs shall be posicd For RIYc duration of project and ;f all confnrrn to the following: a. They ,i,,;: °.:1i:11.1 1.e i11_t;.!4' °. I :A, 1' : r ;;l':: that are able to withstand weather for the cl::i ti;°II, Th,. to remain readable from the b. the sil_:-::•'..;rpJrts shall met currcrr.t safety standards; 7,fie sign shall be 7 teet aboveground; d. 114x11 be easily readable and shall he per table 9,1; and, e. The signs shall include the information required in Table 9.I . On Iarpe or high profile projects, the Applicant shall provide. the proposed prequel, updates. it? tris City's Ptibtic information du: �.�{,�+iir'� C:haj''dc.r fica!ion. CITY OF SPOKANE VAL I,VY STREET STANDARDS FIGURE 9-1 TV PICAL SIGN .N\ Road Work Next 600 Feet Begin: _May 25, 2008 — End: Oct. 12, 2008 Work: I ncludeF.: Sewer and Wata Installation., R.oadway Widening and Repaving D -,:e Caterpillar. (9)9163(,-330, Pave la Tierra, Mike Myl;a1"., (999) I I I -2233, Piu-i Global Engineering I opc imat Platte", (999) 555- 2 I 2, Progression Homes, LLC Thank you for your patience. 1\RLE 9.1 REQUIRED SIGN 1NFC'IRNI A1.1 ON IN 1 TION ON SIGN MIN.11W TEXT HEIGH 1 Road 106..ick Mil.e5T2et 21/2 inch Begin-. Month, F.nn: Month., Day Year 2 inel) Work Ncw Street, Utility Installation, Iavifli 1 ineh (:oritraci.or: Corila P]lone Number, Company \ aillo 1 ii.LGh 1:ngineer Contact N;:iroo, Phoile Nutnber, (.7orripany Name I inch 1)eveloper: Contact Name. Plk.ine Nrn her, Company Name I [hank you. for your patiene.e. 2 inch 9.7.2 NOTICES OF UTILITY SHUTDOWN AND (:C ESS 1.1 FLAT ONS A Ifeotml residents and buinsesare to, Ie ii lied al lL.I 24 hours in ackl...n nee of whcii their utilities (water, electricity, etc.) veil 1 he interrupted .audior when access j 111i tat. The ..ita.11 include tire duration of the interrupi ion.. '1 leCori 0.1,A:1),w provide wriiTen notification and hand deliver the nor to rcsideilts and bus;neqse..3. .1 'he Contruotor shall provide a copy of the notification and a list of *Ili:. .,:itizensibusinex-xx notified io lli Development hispectir, ['his information shall be included in the weekly reports.. 9.7.3 NOTICES FOR IN SPECTIOlsr rho Coril.ractor sini Et inform the Development Inspootor at !east 24 hours in advance of paving operations or installation of drywalls, AL least 72e-veltly two 1101/T5 notice is rquired for work 0er-formed during the weekend Ur on Monday. it is the UpdolAcd Jiminkry 201" 9-5 (1.kupter .9, 1113 pecfiort Certiilaatiun CITY OF SPO NL', VAti_-:V STREET STANDARDS responsibility of the. (...!o 1t:°:rctb-r to coordinate ',vitt'. the On-site inspector for all required inspections and re€]uired testing, 1 r , e t -Engineering will not a:•ccpt ;arty _mprLiv .nlents failing ILO MON th' -minimum number of required tests or failing to trr.cet the r'egi!iied tcst result_,. 9.S FIELD kIND 1,AB TESTING 9.8.1. REPORTING ING 1 Iii On-sitL Oral: pri}icct sum reports. All lab and !i:;;L1-i'.:3Liii:g [4)OIT `,i:'r it be inc1LIdL'L1 in (hese.weekly reports and in fir'ldl _'.'t9 is L[iotl packages. Test reports that ;how ifdiling IC.3tc sti.91I have follow-up test reports !dial. shoo passing tests fOY' the an.e t i`c l a 1141re. )n -site samples shall 1)L used LesL111g. :'tri' 1loncon foi°I11ir14 issues shall be Fully rCCorital ','ltll sLlf'.s':;(.1uerYt .I.:.cu.nents del flint; how the issY1e was corrected, 9.8.2 \Di JN-11im MAT I. ht1AL'TE;STLNC; F. FAQ! ;ENC IF: lrYLel'1�_I i.estithl 1S as specified in t•1 egLlency 4p.'testing rnan• he inur ii c.rh >n "t1_ clkeretion o[ !lie Ou-S.itc Inspector' or the Development hrlspecL_lr. Any i:}''.` 'i r= ti l I special areas of i;0lrC.eirr7 ;1? 1I I be Lci�{1c#,w J ,4it[ inci'eatstd Lc tii.L' .:!. I'_';'s i -,aced on sound il'Y 11$C'4:'i11It judgment. Wet weather conditions may Aso 1`L ttll'C acicinionat Lectin ll"elhiILllCi S. I'be O]: -sits Inspector shall coordinate the number of tests, locations, etc. with an approved materials lab, The Applicant shall. big rusponsiblc for the testing and, rahor°atiory. nests. 1)e °erupm-ent-Engineering will not accept any improvements failing to memo the. minimum number' of -required tests or fabling to n1C:.et the required test results. 9.8.3 Flit LL1)'l'EsT1N AND LAB REQI) RIC rviENTS A mattcriiil supplier, the A1ar11iciint. or the Contractor inay not llerfOrna testing for certificfiLion purposes. Held testing shall be conducted by personnel L1YatL i•J adequ.tt:cl) trained, qualified. and certified in accordance with the appl spe.cifcittions, Field testing and laboratories shall have a national, rti..,t i iied accreditation, for hhc field and lab tests performed by the tirm, such as AA'4J 1 1 O. Washington Association of Building Officials ('4i4'.ABO), Anicrici n Assoc ii :r! I .aboraiory Aeorccl iLi1tiotl (A2f...A)), etc. The en_riy in chitrcc of ficic] testing arid the la.boratery shall submit copies accreditation to the On-site Inspector so this infi>rmation can be included in the certification paelc.ag. . 9,9 REQUiR.ED INSPECTIONS The On -,site lrEspector is required to certify the inspection of [he tbllowirig (See .Appendix 9-B for required testing frequency): 1- it d 9-5 C7iapLee 9 -Inspection & C:ri r:41ILtm CI I Y OF SPOKANE VALLEY S'FRLM' S'I'Aidl)Ali,l)S at, Placement and maintenance of erosion control. A site log shall he completed Cur the project; >:1. Embankment placement arid density control; C., ^1 l'eitcltiai bac 1(1111 density control; d. I11spcction and testing during pipe instant:Lioi: aide] Pipe Lone: material placement (see Section 9.?L1 for additional infonnatium'.. e Sul rade line and grade/density control; 1, J 1MA surfacing line and gradtildcrlslty control. (see Sectioli 9.li.3 for additional intortnatiori Installation of drainage improvemcr is anis any required testing; h. Iinsta[IaLion of curb iirl:.l E4,;ticrand material quality; and, i. Installation c)fsicic'',watl. tt!Id material qualit3 . 9.9.1 EROSION AND, SEli I \11:.\"•(INSPECTIONS A site. log shill he tic prosect. 'lite site Ing shall incluc:it 411i rc3utts )'i . :iC .;1,:cctiut?s, si3LT1pl111L; -apl1lichie and other records. )-o:f 01: % a SC or larger. 11'I:+I3't'.lir;i'rti 111L,' I 1?; ..;('!;tltJCted by a Certified 1'.rosi ii and SL'cl:n1eoi Control it. [ •: E,`t`l_'' ;' 1:.pendi ci.pl . 9.9.2 L I II itV" 9r ,9'I':tl l er sk.S l�tillt;. ' _':'[{shall Irk ;:5 aeeorrtarice VrrI lj Srokasse s.. Lrnt\' 111LL'ri in [':'alp; RC::,'.ai ISlrrr 11SIrLIC t10, IJ1sp4:ct10115. Records Draw i11,:° & 1..11 On cc 1.:4 i_.rt4.111 :J ti cirri i 1.,I ti County [)ivibil}rt of Clti[itics Protocol for 1 o1 S41r'ir. )t.'...heti';`ver ptpC: 1rbIE3ilFltic111 or pipe zone material mace. ictiL i'.':CI euiopiai:lLOJ1 are ;l'wl"h'iiy, the )!i-sli'c 111S1)'tCtor st1tt[1 observe the ' :rl: on a .X)J'is iLl=il I_'figiw, 9,9.3 IINIA ErN I'l': 1IONS The Ori -site Inspector shall be present at aI[ tiln€s during paving operations, 9.9.4 DRAINAGE STRUCTURE INSPECTIONS .0 1i titr;_; during the installation of pipe, and ilr'ailu cit surrounding the and other drt1111Ki,'tl' strLR Lures or tac111tli s. 9.9.:5 MAI S;l'l`. „4N FAMF F:'11 iL1'1'1EEsS 1NSPEC'TIONS The On -alt+,: I:-.-,peetor shall verify that the voI'.'1nc of each fli.i'_+;.:d drainage. Swale equals it exceeds the design volume of i°, .;le at a 6 -inch and I -foot depth. Additionally, the On-site Inspector iht l I:,Y till' 11..r-: is adequate rand continuous grade fromthe 4iret t to the of runoff.. ICthGSC items are deficient, the On-site Inspector shill 11. ;;1_, til C:Droriciorand/or Applicant's Engineer to determine a solu(icl E]cvt,J;.Ji seIlsLiJ 'e aspects +:%t 1 deitcd Jin wy 2r$1 r CITY OF SPOKANl.'s VALLEY L STREET STANDARDS instated materials, such drywell rims, eLe., shall be verified as beim, within narrnal industry tolerances r.e, drywcll rim elevations +/- 511007}, At the discretion of the City, a test of the Cteility may be conducted to demonstrate adequate performance. 'file test shall be perforated in the presence of On-site Inspector. and Development Inspector. Allaspects of the drainage f;acility, including irnd1wcaping, irrigation. and establis;lment of specified vegetation, shall tbc: eon:'I:Jcred in accordance with the accepted plans. An exception rn;tt be LranteLI '. r irl;;,Ie fnmil or Liao -family residential subdivisions where the L'omplF`tion or the <+',:ales is not practical until such time as the dwellings are con,:trL1.t:Iect Ir these t"1`�4,, the Applicant shall rough -uta dL tl+c s(swa les ro the reczuilec3. ', ILm, _ .s.tl] gill :ir;.. V:121:5, inlets, and curb drops taut] ut}tti.r structures in accordance ',vial if the Llrivev. tiv ap;:'r'citacta 't'. idth is greater than dl,:, '.4. iclth l.tc ' ri in the lot plans, engincea ing c.tictl lar.t its shall he suhrnitted that clkri,r rl trite that treatment and storage rct[Lrirt;UY1Cta[= are Jt1vt- E,'o-Lo1,1 er"lrst�.c!i. measures, shall I -'e implementer: tc, ,}a,, ill railed ctre.inagt strLIC'.LLn... and l`' nrev r,T and,for taiXure "iii':' .<tl:' 5:tic slopos. This inclLl_it: I u i::. Iiul it:L 4, !Ming the s \ale with geo-IdL)rit' ;'.,;i' cart be removed i th accumulated silt, until the a' ale i, final -graded and vegetated. Com -canon or the Ir7nrl,ca1i iiw. irrigation. and establishment of specified v'e{xati.tidn :dial] ht required prior t;, i,suar,cc of the final C:Lr;ilicdtC ofOeei1p)ancy clr lira iImpL'.ctiuu for :Any associated dwell t-ig I"t;r single and Twc.1-farniJy dwellings, it shall be the responsibility of the 1 to -ai:i 1'. these r4"(l�Iiret~.us"�s,. Acceptance. of performance sureti,es..inlieu•;[esLttlli,hin be permitted 4:s it}pletion of impr'ov'ements prior Lo Jinni land ac.t:ion or perm rent 4'crt1Iiti•.tti: L+1 O4:r:u1,aliiy is i.t.practIL.ai because o[ cold wt:ather not suit/101u" Ilac c'-tublishnient of vrr s.:taation 9.9.6 SVc. t i.11': 1 N` I`I':t' rioN DURING WARRANTY i1.1IRIOI) and the Development Inspector shall monitor per 161-m once of +.tics during the construction aid warranty periods for proper percolation, Swalcs that do not percolate hal] require corrective work or once:, re and _n c the Financial respcirl i! i' it. 21 t,:;e .A,.,nlicanL, 9.10 1V ISCELLAJNE(.)VVS 9.10.1 (II ,•\ NC I•: ti 1)1,1,0 NG t:_ ON MLA:1RO Changes during eon strut ction that affect the scope cal -the prujcct and/or The accepted individual lot plans shall be submitted for review by the C' '. , Ttic Development Inspector will determine if the change is significant" }vIino}. tidal.._ Cs do not require City review., but shall he discussed with "lie Developit:a.:ist Inspector and documented in the. doily anti week—ty inspection reports. n i Jnrsrra-).1'1)17 r,_ (:hatter 9- lospecrion 1' Cci tification (Try O1' ` I'3 KANk- VALLEY STREET srAND ttl) !'lie Development Inspcctorshall review acid apr ti e an_.. si nilloont field chorines to the i si i3 pr,aris and permits that have prior approval. Rev itis and acceptance of Lilly c : ;nv.c;, t..) approved pl trt.s for utility°, site improvements tifiti Sonet right -of- wat \.\9k :i kill rod uirc ilio; oversight o1 both the ..itilit.\ operator as well cis the I )evelcrpirienl Inspector. 9.10.2 CONSTRUCTION COMPLAINTS Complaints from citizens regarding the l)i' ;.:ect 1.TT' t)e d,.-c.anientcd and shared with the. Development Inspector and resolved by the Applicant. On move significant or high profile projects, the City may assign a Cite staff nienihe, l'uhiic Irl -f Torr-0#Ti, r to notify the public of the project schedule- and provide weekly ftp -dates (See Section 9.6). 9.111.3 COl''1.I"1ACT RESOLUTION During the construction process, occasional differences may arise: bctwiun the Applicant's Engineer and/or Contractor and City staff regarding interprcialiori ref' policies, standards or guidance documents, When the Applicant's Engineer ur Contractor does not agree with an interpretation made by City start; the App] icant' s Engineer may appeal to the Development Scrviecs Seni.irUit} Engineer.a. ate, The determination by the Development Services Senior( it); Engineer shall be final. 911 F1NA1,WALK-THROUGH When reque,ret: Ix_. the Applicant. the On-site Inspce.tcir and. Con traetoi shall prepare a punch list, V..li, i, i° t punch list items hove been addressed, the ,Applicant shall schedule a final walk-thrnu; h with the Development Inspector. If no deficiencies are found. the. On -silt; inspector shall then prepre ,r cenifGci:Li.rn package in accordance with Section 9.13. If dei iciencics are found, another final walk-through with the Development Inspector is required. The Applicant shrill contimie r be responsible [Or correction of all deficiencies until the City acct pts the project unless as noted iii Section 9.14. 11 :M sug ested that the Applicant._shoulil consider taking verification photographs immediately following the final walk-t]uxaugh. Verification photographs rnave'be helpful in resolving cases of damage by third parties. (utility companies, builders, landscapers). 9.12 RECORD DRAWINGS All constructicri changes shall he recorded on a set of approved plans with the original approval stamp from the City. After the final walk --through, the Applicant's l.�.ngineer or Ori -site Itisp'ccior shall prepare record drawings for the project. Record drawings shall be starrrpod and bye a signed certification statement saying: "I hive reviewed The construction and to my knowledge I find it to be in coni .5r'i_ratrce with the approved plans except as noted". 1Ut+dateii dalt4knry Citi.1-'- Chapter 9- inspuction Cc ri 1 <calinn CITY DF SPOKANL VAI ,t.1.Y S MEET STANDARDS C'h.,uucs Ir( 11 :he originally accented shill 'Dc clearly noted wit1, "clouds" on Ow approved E:ui 1F1s And changes 5:11.6! i. nr +- c1 iii :ire. block, Revised notes, uIcS. ttticans, rLr'acies or ether text shat i Ise !i nod t.- }+-_'4Ir. new .sheets are not desired. Any changes ic. easements .shall he c let.orl,. >no wn 011 the record drawings, Record drawings shall ".Record I]rawings-'- if ai change represents a deviation f oni the i.: Lunt or system performance in the jLtdgmLnl of dip:. Applicant's 1 .iigineer, then it be Llcarly shown. ]t is recommended that Sspoi elevations (on swales„ curb- gutter, etc.) tri duple( final grades should he taken and curriparcd with the final design. i]iferentesIm11 be noted on the record drawings, Significant changes shall be coordinatet1 with the .• .pplicant"s Engineer. Elements of the plans that were nut built shall have atie i.;rr change accr=ptarrce Croat the City prior to final inspection and Librnittal of record drawings. 9.13 PROJECT C ;RTl]"1C ATION The On-site In pecLor shall prepare a certification package for the project. The package shall include: a, C'eyti i ittion letter from Engineer with stamp; h. Weal:, ruports; c.I test reports; Li. :l suu!.m[ ry of tile test results, including a discussion of how they compare to rug t i i.r( c] s pec i beat i on; C. The ec rtiri•catinn checklist (Appendix 9-B); f I roti, r and Sediment Centro] Lugs (Appendix '9-D); 1'o.lcI: tickets; h. Al I related cansLrueLic:•n Lluc.u[rre[rts'nand iIrf', cr:rresE)c11dence and comrnutlir.;.ation records; i. Copies of the reykri31;d Lic:.rcdnation fOr the tiel[1 testing staff and bordtory in accordance with Section 9.8.3; J. Copies ofdrywtl1 registrations: and, k. (}ne:ret ofl4P record drawings:, and, One -maw copy of the stainper1 Mvlar. The City of Spok lrlc Valley will review the certification package within two -_week per and shall notify the Applicant if the project is accepted to go to warranty, This Notice of Substantial Completion is conditioned upon no further deficiencies being, discoveredlee before the City accepts the project. Lip€gin troti 1 a 1Lion that the project is provisionally ae epLoi and upon receipt of the warranty surety, the war-ranty period shall begin. !-+1-.rlrl.:.a .l .+:++u-;, 20-1-7 9 -LO Charter 9 -inspection & Curti fu tion CITY OF SPOKANE V.A9.1,F:Y STREET STANDARDS 9.13.1 CERTTFICATION OF DRAIN A(:I", Ii'AC'ILITIES Siocnr.kater tacilities located in tracts shall be certified prior to final plait 1ppro .al 1.6' plats, 511ort pLAS and binding site plans. The certification of stotir dte1 lircilit;cs located t, itll'in Forder easements and rights-of-way f,..51. singly; -family dud two-family ' clw rings may he delayed until the, issuance of the final Certificate of Occupancy (Defer to Section 9,' _54: Urrlit1ti1 C facilities associated with tl c.omtncr 1. huildinp permit shall be cc.16E0d, zt sp c:ilic l itl Section 9,1.3, prior to Issue..:: _: ii_ 1 C. ti: ri` c:.:.te of Occupancy. 9.14 PERFORMANCE SURETV 934.1 PER1ORM.A.NCE SURETY ; l Ti I4 [ F .EI) Except a other;. i s ppm' ided in se t:' ion 9.14. Applicants shall complete a1l plan improv':1ncrlts prior to approval of final plat, short plat, binding site Klatt or any phase. _llcrcol, the is£uarrce of any Certifierrte of Occupancy (commercial, residential, or otherwise), or performance of a final inspection. The City inay authorise the use of performance surety. :solely in Conti rrtlafce with and pursuant to iitty ftEtWY:,ions of section '1.14 9.14.2 PERFORMANCE SURETY CRITERIA (A) A performance surety in lieu of construction of one. or more required plata irprovcrnents may only be accepted by the City it: (1) The required ooii n' lction cannot bc ceompleteti due to situations out of human control such as tldvehie tiv;;atlii.r, inability to acquire construction materials or other unforeseen complications; CI The .Applicant submits at completion schell1ile and the schedule is iippro ped G,k sII r ' t.6.1n-Iandstivtl!11ng iLcnl`+ :Sllttll b.' coi-TILtCd no Biter than 11Inc e0ective date of lllti.ety or ;tidy _?i' of the vcr"n, whichever is Cafli r. tau •:)i ldtit15cfs11i11<_' items Alai be D',.c.ZiJletcd 110 Inter' thk ri IN months a Ur. the cikctive date of the performance surety, (3) - ...1111 cd plan improvement,. have been loathe: that are. sufticierltl_, c-.r)nlpletc 4 Iii .11i:4' the rlcecled prc>oer function and upC`1ii1JUn of i}1'= transportation, ticv cr,',safer, and 5to' inw'ater systems, as dc_.crinittcd try the City; (4) Al]-w�eallic.t cls°i}'in;.. .,ulthces the Fire Deportment are ("r:11 fn:10.1 cl to all locations of flammable!, bcforc 11;irrtinlables brought o1, site; and +(5) The Applicant Pias no other outstanding project improvements within the k_.11 r that lits c. I)een deemed by Lhc City to be 4ixitinleiy'.. in had faith, un ritiAat:naly, car incomplete and the App;ic:ant has provided all acceptable performance surety covering all such [}lrtstandinL improvements, L rhrcxl Janiiriry 2D 17 9'-1 t [:baiter ' - tnspccrioii . Cc t"s.ficgiion CITY OF SPOKANE VAI ,i ,1 •';Y STREET STANDARDS IB r\.1 performance sureties shall be in .tn.ari i 1.i111 tit. 12 `c peveent of the cstim tl'.ci ec.mstr-s.1ct1 d11 cost for all outstanding I ars improvements for the pro,+ewt that are covered hJ• the perlormance sLr[1. f'ci torr'nance sureties shall be later credit or cult savings assignment substantially in the form of the Citv's cIrrltt performance surety. `rhe City shall maintain a c:urrcr;t acceptable draft Foran of performancC: surety. Performance bonds r3rc ttoi .a1Dcied as acceptable p :r[ormanec sock-lit:2s. The Applicant's Engineer r designer crftvcOrd shalt submit quantities for dlrc con-1plete nature of the work to I-.: Gxt :-,•t nc.:(l, The Development inspector str ll cr?Eer that information into an updated ,:tilculitior1 spreadsheet to determine lliu patbnitalle.C.• surety amount, Performanccee urk.iy amounts shall include ali construction costs, iricllittirt2, erosion and sediment control, critical area mitigations and incl.:, .,:..'ion cc-sts. N::}tti }s21 -ns such as granting of casements and dedications of ri 111 t,l `.:Yk .E_ta11 not be covered by a performance surety. 9.14.3 PERF'OR .ii;A ;(:1.: i;iEl: I i.:L EASE The performance c sura slr alt c reieasea when tail of the following conditions have been rima; (A) A u rtiiication package is accepted I)y me City; (13) The Applicant has paid in bill all costs incurred by the City; (C) illi monuments have been reset and referenced by a surveyor; and, (1)) The Applic,ant Ems submitted a warranty sura.qy for improvements in the public right-of-way and harder easements as specified in Sion 9.15, 9.15 WARRANTY SURETY All projects with improvements in the public rights-of-way or border easements shall submit Lo [he City a warranty surety- 'rho warranty surly shall guarantee against iraterial and/or workmanship defects in street construction, inutility work within the rights-of-way and border casements, and/or in drainage facilities as required by the City. As required Icy. t1ie Cite,-tThe -tiarrantv sut-ctv snail guarantee against ddma s to street infrastructure and drainage facilities. 9.15.1 WARRANTY SLTRETYAMOlrNT The Applicant's Nngineer shall submit quantities for the complete nature of the. work to be performed within or on the rights-of-way, border easements, or on the frontage uI'thc City ri ,}it_-c't-way. The Development lrsspt:ctc7. shall enter that. information into anupdatod calculation spreacl4i et rcficctirrg'a rasa! k']l1l:ta:iii ;} the work to be pailbribed. -Die Development Inspector shall tiers . peivent of t]rat total work tri be performed and -request a v arranty surety for tFh:!t amount frorti 111c: Applicant. 9.152 h[' 1 I''1'ABLE SURETIES The warranty surety shall he based on the total watmeity arourtt required for the project as set fhrth irr Section 9.15.1.. Warranty sureties shall be in the form ofa 9-92 Chapter 9- Inspection & Cctifictrtion CITY OF SPOKANL VAI.f.1iY STREET STANDARDS leper of credit, cash savings assignment, nr horr&l in the fovrn or the 'rlrr it w r'r'ant;r surety. .I he City shall in..ir:-:.i [Ii'I'C'I?C a.:ce_"i*.i1 le draft fon-ns of warrterlty .sureties. 9.15.3 WARRANTY DURAT1ON A wtrrr,'ty surety shall remain in effect for two years from the date the Cil' pl'ovk:,.r,:il Iv accents the streets. Ai*fal.St OThii'ty clays prior to the expiration of they '..-.n..>.;r;ry. thi2 Applicant Shall retain an Engineer to inspect the improvements. Any cic-icLeneies ,r,ted shall. he repaired prior to the release of the surety.. 1r Ilk impcctiCrn is rtr::•t conducted and the deficiencies arc not repaired, the warranty my surcty leriewed by the Applicant until this requirement is satisfied- The Duv.'iupliicnt Inspector shallwiil conduct a walk-through prior to releasing the warrant . sorely. 9.15.4 TI' <'1 .AMlES TO COMPLETE .R.EPA1R Tho war,arlry tinct . shall he used to correct deficiencies due to ra:laterials and/or w crr]urr,iE3r,ip, Al any time iletore the end of the wan-anLy perid, the City niay notify the Applicant r1I.'nradcd i- :pairs. ltrepairs are considered to he an imminent danger to the pub ic's wil]r]l..,aietyr, and welfare, the Applicant shall ail within 24 hours to complete the :repair. If the work is not considered a sareL}' issue, the Applicant shall liavehati 10 business days to schedule the work, and 60 calendar days to complete the work, hxLensions of time [nay be considered when necessary due to 'weather constraints. When the Applicant's project k accepted and in 1,vatranly, ar atter releasing the .warranty surety, the Builder shall hem responsible for any damage to the improvements tg—the lot lrontagere ultiiw ft.»n their project including the construction, operation or maintenance rpt Their proiest. Any deficiencies shall be corrected by the Builder prior to the final inspection of their pruaect or tlie issuance of the final Certificate of Occupancy tar the structure, 9.15.5 FA 11 ,1J RE TO COMPLETE REPAIR If the warranty anty repairs are not completed in the time frame specified, the City may choose se to conduct the necessary repairs. The City ig ywifl dither invoice the App tic -nt or ;:; ! legit from the surcty for all Cionsts for the related work, plus a $500.7E dioli 11,•.rrairy . lee, 9.1 ,6 ft F.SikONSIBEATY FOR MALNTENANC'E he Applicant shall bei responsible for maintaining a,ll public improvements, excluding snow plowing, throughout the warranty period. 9.16 STREET ESTABLISHIVIENT When the project has been certified and accepted, the Applicant rna vca.0 request to receive provisional acecptance atter posting a warranty surely pursuant tont accordance with Section 9,14. The Applicant shall h.ei-r? reNponsible is repair failures during the vrarrrtanty Lui ,trpiaslury 21)17 9-13 Chapter 9i- Inspection Jit Certification CITY OF SFOKANV VALLEY STREET STAN DA I]S period pLLLSLLa1',nt iolr accordance with Seed k ii 9.15.4. Emil acceptance shall be granted after the Warranty period assuming all deficiencies have been carrected, The City Manager is responsible for approving the establishment of new streets. When the projm receive3 tirlal acceptance, the ! •` °C"iL Engineer shall recommend to the City Manager that the streets be established. Fxia;ail Jo!rsa; n 0I" '!-I f 1.:!1:lpLc CITY OL SPOKARE VALLEY STREET STANDARDS Appendix 9-A - Appendix 9-B - Appendix 9-C - Appendix 9-1) - APPENDIX fisiDEX N•linin:Lcrn M.Lltet.i2-it Testing Frequencie9 Fin.,1 CcrLi Je-nion Clic;GILlis • Sample Rem m,...ed krosicn and Scdimcv Conical Log 1)11410.ied JaFFEbarko-20-17 9-T 5 Chapter 9- Instputium & Citi 11 CUL] i)rt CrrY 01::4I'0KANTE VALLEY STREET STANDARDS PP N.DI 9- — Material Testing uencies The #ollc.:T r,p. restirs_ Cicquencies represent the Ininirnum requirements during construction. if i div'idu 11 r iii to meet specifications, additional testing shall be conducted to assure. Earth F.nrIigtrkmcr:t Roan Subgrudc Crushed Rock density test per lift per 500 CY placed 1 density test per 100 LZ' of lane or equivalent 1 density test per 100113ti' prime -or equivalent per lilt Trench Embrinkment l density test per 150 CY with varying test d ptht, Crushed I ;la. 1. ontl£ r- (.:ui b avid Sidewalks Concrete for Curbs and `>idrwaII4.s 1.;wr e;(5,tict c' lel u ri i i Asphtkll1>iIv matt t'odnted Jnmcm, L;.- I1) l cicnslty rest per 100 l.F of curb of wall( length per Int Unless t€;st.:tl :rw part cif the ro c]wav crushed rock) I set (1. cylinders) per 100 CY (Minitlrutn 1 set per clay) 1 RC1 of air, ;hump, temperature, etc. on first tCtil4:li.and wit cylinders thereafter 1 gr'ic]nfinri te4t: l sand utlttivLiertttesL fractured face test I Lot —100 tons 5 random der sity tests per lot (Minimum 5 tests per day) 1 test to vcfrify ;graidaion per 1,000 tons 1"1trtn)met 1 test per day) 1 test to vc:rity ,sphalt content per 1,000 Lens {M4riJ]iiLIJ I ]. Test per day) I test. Lu vuril_: r,i:Jxirrsort density per 1,000 tom; I, 1i1JitllLJu 1 te;t per day) (.erl.L1 cation CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY STREUT S'I-AN 1)A RDS APPENDIX 9-B — .Final Certification Checklist (Sample) Project: Cert ificstHMI Letter: Statement of intent to certify the project, Pa? Stamp and Signature,. Record flrawings FV!ylnr Drawings: PE. Stamp and Signature Lettered certification state rr;nt (Section 9.12) Project 1hicumenls: .Dai Cy Inspection Reports: 'Field Reports: Inspection of Asphalt Paving: l:mipac[ion Reports: 100 On site inspection during pavin1 4e1r 1iencli liRs. \'k ,ilea rrenel1 lifts. trench lifts. ('rusi-ed Rock !ins. Material Documents: Field and Laboratory t'ests; Concrete Subgradc: Crushed Rock Asphalt J I Field Test (Sfurrlp. Air Content, (("cirnpaztion) I..('t,rf] .titin, Depth) On Site Inspcei.ions of Drainz:ge Items: f(JLlt[er inlets: 4icte,.�rll \'.cult ; [)ruin.dgti ()rho': 11ii icn;:wsj Late Test (Break Test) (Grad [ ion, Proctor) (Gradation- Proctor) (Rice, Gradation. OH Content) In corningJClutfuiu; Corresii on Hence Updated Jaltii&v _ sF `J. I_ f I n Iv `;- 1 c tic ri,n {:rru:l�-a,Cl4n CITY OF SP(JK. .NE VALIAN gTREET STANDARDS A PPEN D I Xa -C : -- Removed APPENDIX 9-D — EROSION A N SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG the following items, are to he included in the daily Logs and ii spcction reports to assure CO]nfurnixace: a_ Date of Irispectic5]1. h, When, whe.Te.when and how the BMPs were installed, removed or modified. c, Repairs netded or made. d, OhservaLions of"BMP effectiveness acid proper placentenI. e. I cc'crrmmcr] ]: cions for improving perPPrmaii e €i1Bxv1Ps. the stormwater runoff potentially leaves the site, is collected in a system, (i,e,, road ditch, .I(]111 s v,er-), and enters receiving. v ai CLSi5f t�'oi sial . g. 1f w'i tC`i' ti;;a' I' flowflowc.. Froin the ideiiiiiv [Ii& poi1.i ai 14i'sieli it ki4t i Tics ccmcentraied I!'..'11,?rit4 includingFSNI1 : .i. r4,[14i1red [0 Cnsurc adecitmcv. UI:dctted Jim.uor:y 2Or7 9-18 C"1req,Ler 9- litspectiods & Certification CITY OF SPOKANE VA] J EY STREET STANDARDS THIS .PM;F. I EFT I NT ENTtONALLY BLANK E rioted -J„ husk 201.7 9-I9 Chapter 9- insinction c Certification CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY STREET STANDARDS CHAPTER 10- MAINTENANCE Chapter Organization 10,1 Introduction 10.2 MA riteriance Responsibility.. 1 10.2.1 Public. Stre.ets 1 10.2.2 Private Streets:. and H. iveways 1 10.3 Required Dtxurnc.nts 2 10.3.1 Ficimeewriers'a id Property Owners' Associations 2 10.3.2 Opun..i(iiL5si acid Maintenance Manual 2 10.3.3 Fidadc:131 PLin 3 10.3.4 Conversion from Private to Public Street 3 upt_\1 1-)Lc1rihr 2009 Chaptcr 10 — Maintenaace i 0-i CITY 01`SPUKANI; VAI.I.I.Y: I I 1?1•:1.SI ANI)AI 1)S THIS PAGE IS INTE '1O!NA1,1.Y I,Ii I+ F BLANK{ e1ikrfeJ 17cecrnh r 2L)09 10-i i Chapter 10 MairkLL:9%an CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY STREET STANDARDS 10.1 INTR.ODUC~TION This chapter establishes the parties responsible to maintain the public and private infrastructure erei.ded itt, development, In addition, it provides a list of documents re(' iced to be-tatinii fid during project review. 10.2 MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITY 10.2.1 PUBLIC STREETS Lipon releasing the warranty surety and acceptance 0rthe public infrastructure, the City maintains all public streets (curb gutter, and pavement) and public starmwaiter drainage structures (drywells, inlets and pipes) located within th,e public: rights -0f - way and within border easements that serve public street runoff The City do is not responsible for maintsinmainten,ance of sidewalks or landscaping of swa'les and grass strips, even if located within the public right-of- way or border easements. Property owners are responsible for the maintenance of these features as described below , Swale maintenance means include, preservation of the original area, volume, configuration and function of the stormwater facility as described in the approved plans. Swale maintenance also includes mowing, irrigating, and replacing when necessary the Lawn turf within the swales. The pEroperty owners are also responsible for maintaining sidewalks free of obstructions and debris. including snow and lce. IF the property owners fail to maintain said facilities. the Ciri shall give a notice of such failure to tl"t: propeity owner_.. if not corrected wil iu the per -kid indicated on said notice_ the City Inas the right to correei the maintenance failure. or have it corrected_ at the expense of -the property awrners. 10_2_2 PRIVATE STREETS ANJf) DRIVEWAYS The City does is not responsible for maintalnmaint nance of any of the - infrastructures located on private streets or private driveways infrastructure. Private streets and driveways and related facilities shall be contained within a 1';•ernianentIy estahlfished tract or easement prooviditng legal access to each lot served. The ,Applicant shall provide arrangements For the perpetual maintenance of the private streets; private driveways. and all elements of the stormwater system (including swales within the right -of --way and border easements), and any other related facilities. The (:ity does shall not furnish, install, or maintain signs fir private streets including stop signs or street name signs for private streets intersecting public streets or "No Parking" signs, The owner rnay iuistall their own &Signs shall be in accordance with MUTCD. Installation of signs at intersections with public streets require _ ut n•urt a e approval from t# n; -e, tithe City Traffic Engineer, when installing signs at intersections with publk streets. Access shall be granted to the City to provide emergency maintenance of private facilities. The cost of emergency maintenance shall he the responsibilityx of the property owners or the Homeowners' Association in charge of maintenance, Det rther'i)09 ilia pica 1 ri - Mairrtenancc 111-1 CITY OF SPOKANE ;JA1.7,.6-: `:' STREET STANDARDS 10.3 REQUIRED DOC UNLENTS The roImaintenance-related items shall be submitted ftn all projects with private. sLrcc+.- .;nc 'or c::+ii :non areas: 7,.,1the conditions. L verias1Ls and Lestrictions (CC' RS) for th:: homeowners' it_ .c;cittiic}r1 (I -10A.) err propel].) owners' association (PC)A) in. charge o[' operating _mel maintaining all elements or the private, sired. system (see Section 111,3.1); b. An operations and maintenance (O&M) nialrual 'sec Section 10.3.2) e. 1A flllatl;:.Ial plata outliniIig the funding Jit COS the: operation, maintenance. repair, x71141 rL'plai.a mint 1:)f the pr11ate street system, rola ed Facilities arid/or common L1rcLtw (sc.e Section 1 J. Street haat tcw,ilee agre.mei—as. L14: ciprli4;LiF?]i;; L. Rc:c'.rpl'o::arl 11 ti Ctrl"L; ,Ill:.11r - 1.11, bk.; and, II Drainage. casements, as applicable, Rcfbr to the ,S`poicatre Regional' Siornrwcfier Manual tbr tnaintcnancc rcquircmcuts for stQrmwatcr 110,3,1 HOMEOWNERS' ERS' ANTI) PROPERTY ORWI'slERS" ASSOCIATIONS .1n f If:'.\ sl!.8I1 }) formed to maintain the privsw streets, signs, L'otr',7fGc r).,1t s, ether Icl;}tc,l t%iciiitics 71idlor common `ireasn c0m1u2rcial:'irrdlustriRI and ilk' dev :1C pinerlts with slia1.cdl Cac:ccss #ir1C1 - uit:.11e i wrers, POA or similar entity si,1{i11 lOrmerl, ora reciprocal -use agreer icrlt executed. 1.1'the I-101 or -1 OA has CC'&Rs, a draft i:.opy ot'the CC R.s. for #lii-.! HOA car POA shall be. s1.3blilitts.cl with 1] c civil alis] drainage plans 'Dire CCL.t,Rs s' 1,i son imarize ibe i iailltl:riaricc rc.s 1111L3IljllIILCS c)t +.14 [-1(:1.,x\ ur POA, refer 1.o 11 t i&;.l t Manual. acrd include of the sinLi !g kind; calculations and Financial Plan. Annual. HOA + r POA . dues Ali{til provide for the annual operation and maintenance or pri Pa(e Stl'ec1 ,, related 1ac1Iities, and common areas. The ["unci calc,,l,1 :+1:ds sitar: :i] i; include costs for the triaintenarrcc of thk ,and {t1] r!:ieiliti associated with the storniwatcr system (RLIcr L:1 Chaprc.. ! c.I.. i'L. S7.tnl-crf7e Regional Siornnivier 34.-anuril). HuniL`uw i1c'..,.h ;ire- to shall be non- pro[il urg_aniLL<li;li1s Se re[ary of Slate. A standard businus: li:ciisc is not :.:: 10.3.2 (li'FR. 'I Z(11 AND ,11.'1 i i 'I I:, .l! (:I' '1. \ 12.i 1. All projects 1`'1111 pril,ite 5'7.,'M1.`l` t!.'oli:Cl i:;:ll! els+ s iri:1S Used for StOlin Ater lil, tI11J �:i1!.ei s1i i1! l;aYl: ai! (=) a' 11;V -1;A i ; ;;. C .+.t:.: '+ �f r engineered driveways may ttlsc, I,, re 1uircil 'ri ubllr:i :1r1 C}&M :'11Lcuu;!!, O&M Manual must shall include, ata mi.:Ai:H.1m: a. 1Y,.s:.ription of the entity responsible for the perpctuat maintenance, -iicluding legal means of-successorship; L ew uer-Alt)9 Chapter 10 -Maintenance 10-? C'rry o1• tii' )KAt li VAI,I,tiY 51 Itl,l.l 4'I :'1 1)/%1.0) b. Description of sired iliaintcna.ticc tas144 to be per'tcirrned and their 11,.11.1 .1;0=11.311C 1 a !oink/turn street crack, sealing, pot hole repair, J\cr]a1V, pity in':'Il !;:1}it.Ie .Li':'.:!it, ete.; c, '20c-wipLion o1'th'.. .t.} rfl t+..:I Ittainteiiiit� e (asks to be p.22.tbfrno:cl and their r€citient; ', int:aLide, at it JT1IlJJ1T11lITl, S. rtf4 J71aiiitcriarlce and !.c]nuving sistti!11 nL from drew.ve1ls, cat'e:ibasins., .at1+:I i nc system S'.vale maintenance. means preservation of the l7rl:=1nal 4!'eia, `,`'::rlti;ne coatirdtion and function of- the storrJrlwiitcr facility as iktscri] .. Lc i Anain1eninco also includes mowing, irrigating, and i. pla(:iltg VYtictn necessary the lawn turf within the.swalcs d. Description of emergency maintenance tasks to be perforated and their Frequency, such as gate operation, ::Na Parking" signs, access to fire hydrants, fire lanes; e, iescription of the source eonLrol best management practices (B Ps) such as street sweeping (refer to Chap tor 11} fthe , «. io + L5` rkini f . list of the expected design life and replacement schAtile: of each oomp°neut. ofthe private street and/or skurmwater management system; general site plan (drawn to scale) showing the overall Iayout of the site; and, IL Contact information for theEtles 4-tingint.et. 10.3.3 FIN \NCIAI, PLAN L71..}}, iL1i vI.I;Li,tuee regarding financial plarillin-_ tor maintcnrice and rep! r cernent tir'w,I.S, a Financial flan is requirLxI. The Fi!Tattjuit-t Plan shall inctude the t(IJtowitig items:: g. a. A list of all private streets and related ticilities, coninioti areas, iiridfcir storrnw iter management facilities, expectccl maintenance activities and associated costs: b. Sinking Fund calculations dial talo into consideration probable. rtiilatt. n over the life of L]lc. ini'rasirueturc irtd estimates r.or the funds needed to be set aside annual]ty; and, G. A nrcehanisrn for initialing and sustaining the siniking tilde( account demonstrating that perpetual maintenance wit] be sLtsttiMed 10.3.4 CONVERSION FROM PRIVATE TO PUBLIC STREET The Ap-alic,artt shall submit ati[IioiiLalion ti'otn all 1'.-. '.;:rt ;:n;....,.,i ail avtiti-able cons:iftlf..'tfu:J did...ings of tato: s{Ibj1 street. sLanrpL;Ll iirtatkysls o1 the }s1vcmeiHI '+'aruJ slabs r.i'_I'' separated no tircctlCl-thiin I 00 feet apart, or as r';'i1 1 red t', til: City. I k ?'ic11 photos at cvcry 50 leer, or vis Lhe City rcd1LIires, shtiu1 application. lits mtrr 20 ? 1 t}-3 I ;1'1 t'7 I t' . ;',1 Jiii1C'ILIfiCt CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY STREET STANDARDS the City Alai] review the information. visually check tl:tc street and determine requirements to bring the Street LL}] tai currcnl CiL5' standards. A letter Or requirements slut!] bc Issued b ilric Cita'. TIik, Applicaatlt(s) shall rrieet the requirements [}L[o]'c the :trc'cL Iw tt44:4i}l'-' I; '! i-°uIr'.l: Applicant shall prepare i legal descriptiult o transfen'ing the property to the City Lance the corrected and accepted. L ei'tiwLIAr 24)( 9 FINDINGS AND RECOMNIENDATION.S �ililE S.IPOILICs'E VkLI.EV PLANNTNC; COMMISSION FOR CIA -2017-0004 January 25,11118 Tip fcdlowiT.F. Cuoirni,ssion's d6cision to recommend approval. Flackground: Tho City of Spokane Valley interim developninii( !.:".'.p.liati0rt8 were adopted on March 25, 2003 (Ordinance No. 53). T1 eT:e. int...hided the Spokane Road Statidard2. En. Deermly.1r, 2017)9 Inc. City adoptt:41 Ordinance 09-ir! I- City of Spok.nne..VaLq: Standards. Chapter 11 F....iandard Plans. updatcd th January, 21)1 II and Chmpter 9 w 1,!.ecril..:-.01.L.nts wore aridatuti as, part of th..2. Ceropreltcr„:-.ive Plan in D..2.cember5201(1 Lr5.° th ci Utdinaice. 16-018. 2., C. TA -20I 7-0004 a City initiated te.:vt i me7idnier„t c iiii.ISpokEne (SVN!C) to TriciLlily SVMC. 20.E0 arid 2'2.110 to i'f.nOve. referoaces Era ['Win update Chapter — Prat:R.:: A rialysis inzicimee ori rzaffie reqt]iteillesiTsfc :LPA !di]l areas, update Chapiur Mairte: e r.ttddruL.; Fenera1,111.1way Administro tion (1.11.WA) C0.11.HJE12111iS on the of SidC:Vea[L; and petkifin mihor changes to most eltapters in. the Sli-eot Stfindartis rcorganizatiou [,.) implementation, 1. JIcPlanning Coinri;i:-;&ion fir: Id a publ le bearing awl condueted deLberations 011 Jannary 11, 2L118, The Planning ComaLE:i..I.:1 0:31.42Li 6-0 to rcconirnerid approval a modifikt to City Colima Planning Cortimis,sion Find inr: 1. .1tecon1inencicd Modirmitiuns 1."..11c PlarmiTud, Colnmiion recommelded the. f.7.11owin JoodifK.ai.ionLk altd/or addle.itilla[ 10111iirenierast C 1 A -2C.]7 -11.:1101. SV1v1{,' 2.2..1.30 to replace reforenets Lo "dr.veltyprnent eliVik:C8...F.c.nior engineer" with t'City des.plee". b. Mojify 1.3.2 bu[[et 3 as foilowsTounmirc public facilities end services meet ieyd of 991Vir,e .5ni11darGs TE7. Pian, c. Se,2tion I.7; paraginph two sentelICC tAvO i f;-...1 lows: Property owners arE mporisitik for rI- riinte3-im !c.f.'. of these fuitives its 3.::sc.i."ibeci [DIN 2. Corripliatice with S1r'MC17,90,150(F) Appnaval C.Titcria a The proposed le -NE NniuF(11.1-,,:ntt o115llr with the app/Icable provisions of the Cc prriprenensi ve ?Fan. Findings(s): i. Land 11,.;;(: Poiicv - R• .1e;f71111n.thoods are served by safe and eorivenicrit motorized and traiwnortat',-.n h. pJr1iuIc.J Pi - 9 PIT...1de and maintain qL.ality 5tme.t, Fiderwalk. ElEld shared -use. path surfaues that provide a sal C cnvirorin-Amt for all uaers. i. Capt[ Facilities Policy - 3: Coordinate the construction of public. infra.nictore with private development to minimize costs. Findings and ...4'....!Lumr.cridati.uiks thc Srv.i.ailc V? key Irrirg CTt;-21.;17-C,0,14 Far IntZ Finding(s): Theproposed Frnlendincnt hears a substantial reiationto public health, safety, weifare ind protection of the environment 3. Con clusiou(s): R. Tile proposed i»Kt amendment is consistent with the City's adopted COJalprebensive Plan and the approval criteria contained in SVMC 11.80.150(1=). b. The Growth Management Act rewires that the coanprchemive- land use plan and cieveiopinWir regulations shall be subject to continuing review and evaluation by the City. Recommendations: The Spokane Valley Planning Commission therefore recommends the City Council approve ('T.=,- t117-. 0004 with modifications specified above. Approbvcd this 25th day of January, 2018 £_—__- iidie1le asmussen, Chair ATTEST Deanna Horton, Administrative Assistant Findings and. Recommendations or the Spokane Valley PraOni ng Cor misSion CTA -2017-0004 Page2af2 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Sitikane COMMUNITY & PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT PLANNmic DiVIsION .0001411ey. SrA le FL REPOR'1' .1XND REC.'oM>'►'n NDATTON TO TTIE PLANNING COMMISSION CTA -2017-0(104 STAFF REPORT DATE: ltanualry 2, 2018 REARING DATE: AND LOCATION: January 11, 2018, beginning at Et:00 p.m., Spokane Valley City Hall Council Chambers, 10210 FAA Sprague Avenue, Spokane Valley, Washington 99206. PRor'ns,&I. I)T:sl:I,trrrroN: A City initiated cods text dmendim nl to the Spokane Val Municipal Code (S \IMO to make minor revisions to the Strout Slandards to address changes in responsibilities due to the City r -organization and in implementation of the standards, Fctk ral I Jik},I aT, Administration (1'1 IWA) comments. on maintenance of sidewalks; traffic. r .cluiremenis for Si P . infill area, :end to revise Chapter 20_g0 Boundary Line Adjustments/Eliminations and Chapter 22.130 Development 'Transportation in7pr'oveanents to remove references to Future: Acquisition ArG7s, APPROVAL, CRETI?Rr.d: Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan, Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVL1+1C) Title 17 General Provisions, and S 1V1C 19,30.040 Development. r�'o�t�l +lit.rr� lt: l ;ii ,c;ricli; ciifi. SUMMARY wRrc Orrin iILNDATr(1N: Staff- recommends approval ofth code text iat77?=i'J77t'nt STAFF PLANNER; Midi Hltriois, Planner-, Tlcnry Allen, Senior Engineer 1kTi Ac'r1MEN`I; Exhibit 1: Proposed code text amendments to SVN]C Chapter 3 Exhibit 2: Propr s d c,.}cry lexl ,tnr, .1,1z;n to S'N1C 20.N l��cluk it :i; Props)sed cocc iLKt amendment's to SVi1IC 22,130 BACKGROUND INI.ORM, f 1t)N 1, APPLICATION PROCESSING: SV1v1C_ Chapter 17.80, Permit Processing Procedures. The following summarizes application procedures for the proposal. Process s Date SBPA Review 1 ILC proposal consists of changes that are procedural in nature and are considered exempt under WAC 197 -11 - Of.)( 19)(a) an[I (h) NIA %ail -Repoli. arid Recurnirmidalion CTA -2017-000,1 Process Published Notic-e of Public, 11earing Date December 15,2017 and December 22,2017 Sent Notiee, °I—Pub 11 c Fleuri rig to Nia IT/agencies.: Decciiilcr 22. 2017 2, PROPOSAL BACKGROUND: On P./larch 25, 2003 1[7,2. Cityof Spi.}...Liim '%/ilkly CityI.OiIILjI approved Ordinance No, 53 adop7ing the City's first interim development ]egt ttiC1T wiic1ii V.ztre S1i:11011(!. C011174y .1111).11 CURL% Mi.% 1 d 0)-03 Cin.. of S. poi(ane ';treet. Standards.. C.'hap7.er ±.1 Pial...2.016 Clmpi.er 9 Suret.::. Requirements ....if (n.:: Plan ick 1..1occ!,.11.-y2.i.... 21)16 0.5: :he adoption of Ordinance Since then the C:ty has undergone a reorganization and changes to its implementation of the tic providi fir Lht City with auth.:31. iy TO maintain sidewalk.s. Staff was also sent draft reguiat'..ons for review and !their ace itworporata in the. draft. White addrc.ssin.gih.c. additional FHWA cornincmis, Ll!c. City clec.icied LC ttpdatc the SVNIC: and street standard documents to reflect changes from The re..organintton .lind implementation. Sped11,... include: • Addition of Limited Traffic lmpact Analysis (TIA) to provide.guidarice on traffic for. SF:PA 11111 • SVIAC Tit[C. 20 Subdivision Re2.ulations -Chapter 20,80 Boundary Line Adjustmen101.iiminatii.pr:!..., 1-Jeri...:nc,;(... to • SVMC Ii[!: -2 22 Desigr. and f.)oveloi}inent Staidar-Js C itante:. 22.130 'De..,,..e..iop.ment Tran portion remove reiereiwe...; Futly..e ▪ Minor cliaio.es to !nos( eft:inter.; to Felker. r.:-..o...amzation (c,g. now authorit7,. is C in: Engineer:, a Ruvkiiiiis 1.0 ili)111.21P,210.:1114111 i2;ill'H;;:31114.; \la(' FJ11.2C' I-TOCCSS, PAA and 1.1.i),1.2r record dm wi ngs; proposed sEreetE, not requ iced to connect to futare FIN1)11ING'S AND CONCIALSIONS SPEel 1,1'. TO TrfiE MTTNICTVAL CODE TEXT A_ME1NDMENT 1. Ce.ornillinee with Title 17 (General Provisions) of the Spokane Valley Municipal Cade a. Findipus: 7.80.150(F1 Munidpal Code Td Ainendr.-ten; Thc i.t. may approve 1,...[Dnic.10231 Code Text ct foc.f.; t17.,11 (11 Con4)1,-2i'Crisi ye Plan.... di! 11.-..:11. The amendli}".:nt Zt13:1. Opportuilit' N.Liivitic. while prot...2::.iing or the (i.151,11(.stl the development 0 corzy,xit.i5le flexible Staff Repo r.t tiTI;i Rc.comin ndt1tiun C;:I.A-2017-1)O114 (2) IReIera n t m porehensivea Plan goals and policies are shown below: i.Mnt{ l!Mc I'crlicy - #S I-nsiirc that neighborhoods are served by safe and convenient motorized and non -motorized transportation routes. '1 i iiislpnri<ii.;tm Policy -41 Provide and maintain quality street, sidewalk, and .shared - use path surfz.ces that provide a safe environment for all users. {';ipi(a1 Fti1:.iPolicy —3 Coordinate the construction of public infrastructure with private development to minimize costs. '1'hc proposed amendment bears a substantial relation to public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment; Staff Analysis: The proposed amendment establishes standards that will reasonably protect neighborhoods from adverse impacts of tilansportation u`;c`,ti ii., wcl I a, unsure the property owner is responsible for maintaining sidewalks for safety purposes. The City will also have the ability to charge a fine for those who do not TM inl;yin the sidewalks, h, Conclusion(s): lie proposed lcxi ro %T1thr ctrl is cnnsistcnt with the approval criteria contained in the SV C. 2. Finding and Conclusions Specific to Public Comments El. Finotin.gs: No pi.iblic: cornmunls h;tve been received to date. b. Conclusion(s): Adequate public noticing was completed for CTA -2017-0004 consistent with adopted public noticing procedures. 3. Finding and ConCIUSIOIL9 Specific to Agency Comments a. Findings: The draft regulations were sent to staff for Their review. b. C'oncliosion($); The Suggested revisions are incorporated in the draft regulations. A. OVFP AI.J.. CONCLUSION The proposed amendment is consistent tihilli the applicable ,oik ;Ind p clicks s,f 1Frc Comprehensive Piwi. The amendment will allow reasonable opportunity for infrastructure development activities while protecting the character of the neighborhood, The propoL4ed amendment sets standards dial will pa°otce nei * iborhoocts fi.oirr the impacts of traffic and the anainicnancc of sidewalks. Page 3 of3 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: February 27, 2018 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ® new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Second Reading Proposed Ordinance 18-004, amending SVMC 20.20 and SVMC Appendix A - Subdivision Regulations GOVERNING LEGISLATION: SVMC 17.80.150; 19.30.040; and RCW 36.70A.106; RCW 58.17 PREVIOUS ACTION TAKEN: Administrative Report, January 30, 2018, First Reading February 6, 2018 BACKGROUND: CTA 2017-0003 is a text amendment to SVMC Chapter 20.20, General Provisions to address non -legal lots and innocent purchasers, eliminate inconsistencies with Title 19 resulting from the Development Regulations update in 2016, provide clarifications and minor grammatical changes, and modify the definition of flag lot in Appendix A. The draft regulations generally include: 1. Clarify and define what constitutes a "legal lot" in the City of Spokane Valley; add language to allow development on a non -legal lot by an "innocent purchaser"; 2. Set forth criteria for development on a non -legal lot; 3. Eliminate the additional width requirement for corner lots; 4. Eliminate the ratio of lot width to lot depth requirement; 5. Eliminate language that requires the arrangement of lots and streets in conformance with approved plans; 6. Modify the requirement for a minimum 15 foot border easement to allow the City to determine the required border easement or right-of-way width up to 15 feet maximum; and 7. Amend Appendix A by modifying the definition of a "flag" lot. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on December 14, 2017 to consider the amendments. Following the public hearing and deliberations, the Planning Commission voted 6-1 to recommend that the proposed code text amendment be approved with changes. On January 11, 2018, the Planning Commission approved the Findings of Fact and Recommendation to City Council. On January 30, 2018 staff provided an administrative report to City Council with Council consensus to move the amendment to a First Ordinance Reading. City Council conducted a first reading of the ordinance on February 6, 2018. OPTIONS: Move to approve the ordinance with or without further amendments; or take other action deemed appropriate. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to approve Ordinance 18-004 updating subdivision regulations. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: N/A STAFF CONTACT: Marty Palaniuk, Planner CTA -2017-0003 RCA for 2°d Ordinance Reading page 1 ATTACHMENTS: A. Draft Ordinance 18-004 B. Planning Commission Findings and Recommendations C. Planning Commission Meeting Minutes 11/09/2017 D. Planning Commission Meeting Minutes 12/14/2017 E. Draft Planning Commission Meeting Minutes 1/11/2018 F. Staff Report CTA 2017-0003 CTA -2017-0003 RCA for 2°d Ordinance Reading page 2 DRAFT CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 18-004 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON AMENDING SPOKANE VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE APPENDIX A RELATING TO FLAG LOTS; AMENDING SPOKANE VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 20.20 RELATED TO LEGAL LOTS, INNOCENT PURCHASERS, AND DOUBLE FRONTAGE LOTS; AND OTHER MATTERS RELATING THERETO. WHEREAS, the City of Spokane Valley (City) previously adopted Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) Title 20, relating to subdivision regulations, and has made subsequent amendments from time to time as appropriate; and WHEREAS, such regulations are authorized by RCW 36.70A; and WHEREAS, on November 9, 2017, the Planning Commission held a study session; and WHEREAS, on November 14, 2017, the Washington State Department of Commerce was notified pursuant to RCW 36.70A.106, providing a 60 -day notice of intent to adopt amendments to Spokane Valley development regulations; and WHEREAS, on November 24, 2017 and December 1, 2017, notice of the Planning Commission public hearing was published in the Valley News Herald; and WHEREAS, on December 14, 2017, the Planning Commission held a public hearing, received evidence, information, public testimony, and a staff report with a recommendation followed by deliberations; and WHEREAS, on January 11, 2018, the Planning Commission approved the findings and recommended that City Council adopt the amendments; and WHEREAS, on January 30, 2018, City Council reviewed the proposed amendments, Planning Commission findings, and Planning Commission recommendation. City Council determined it desired to consider adopting the amendments; and WHEREAS, the amendment set forth below is consistent with the goals and policies of the City's Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, SVMC Appendix A and SVMC 20.20, as amended, bears a substantial relation to the public health, safety, welfare and protection of the environment. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley ordains as follows: Section 1. Purpose. The purpose of this Ordinance is to amend chapter 20.20 SVMC General Provisions to address illegal lots and innocent purchasers, eliminate inconsistencies with Title 19 resulting from the development regulations update in 2016, make clarifications and minor grammatical changes; and modify the definition of flag lot in Appendix A. Section 2. Findings and Conclusions. The City Council acknowledges that the Planning Commission conducted appropriate investigation and study, held a public hearing on the proposed amendments and recommends approval of the amendments. The City Council has read and considered the Planning Commission's findings. The City Council hereby makes the following findings: Ordinance 18-004 Page 1 of 9 DRAFT A. Growth Management Act Policies - Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA) provides that each city shall adopt a comprehensive land use plan and development regulations that are consistent with and implement the comprehensive plan. B. City of Spokane Valley Goals and Policies - The City of Spokane Valley has adopted goals and policies consistent with the GMA and adopted County -Wide Planning Policies, set forth below. Land Use Goal LUG -G1: Maintain and enhance the character and quality of life in Spokane Valley Land Use Goal LUG -G2: Provide for land uses that are essential to Spokane Valley residents, employees, and visitors. Land Use Goal LUG -G4: Ensure that land use plans, regulations, review processes, and infrastructure improvements support economic growth and vitality. C. Conclusions The proposed amendment bears a substantial relation to public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment. The proposed text amendment is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan and the approval criteria pursuant to SVMC 17.80.150(F). Section 3. Amendment. SVMC Appendix A is hereby amended as follows: Lot, double frontage: An interior lot with frontage on more than one street. Lot, flag: A lot of irregular shape with reduced frontage on a public or private street with dimensions which are otherwise adequate at the building line. Flag Lot: A lot with two distinct parts: a. A large portion of the lot which is the only building site; and is located behind another lot; and b. A strip of land which connects the flag to the street and provides the only street frontage for the lot. Ordinance 18-004 Page 2 of 9 DRAFT Lot, interior: A lot within a subdivision that is not located at the intersection of any adjacent public or private street. Section 4. Amendment. SVMC 20.20 hereby amended as follows: Chapter 20.20 GENERAL PROVISIONS Sections: 20.20.010 Purpose. 20.20.020 Exemptions. 20.20.030 Legal lot. 20.20.040 Approval required prior to recordation. 20.20.050 Prohibition against sale, lease or transfer of property. 20.20.060 Vertical datum. 20.20.070 Monumentation. 20.20.080 Professional land surveyor. 20.20.090 General design. 20.20.100 Findings. 20.20.110 Attached single-family subdivisions. 20.20.010 Purpose. Pursuant to the purposes set forth in RCW 58.17.010, these regulations in this title are necessary to: A. Promote the health, safety, and general welfare in accordance with standards established by the state and the City; B. Promote effective use of land by preventing the overcrowding or scattered development which would be detrimental to health, safety, or the general welfare due to the lack of water supplies, sanitary sewer, drainage, transportation, or other public services, or excessive expenditure of public funds for such services; C. Avoid congestion and promote safe and convenient travel by the public on streets and highways through the proper planning and coordination of new streets within subdivisions with existing and planned streets in the surrounding community; D. Provide for adequate light and air; E. Provide for adequate water, sewage, drainage, parks and recreational areas, sites for schools and school grounds, and other public requirements; F. Provide for proper ingress and egress; G. Provide for housing and commercial needs of the community; H. Require uniform monumentation of land divisions and conveyance of accurate legal descriptions; I. Protect environmentally sensitive areas; J. Provide for flexibility in site design to accommodate view enhancement and protection, protection of streams and wetlands, protection of steep slopes, and other environmentally significant or sensitive areas; K. To eEnsure consistency with and le further the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan; and L. Provide a process for the division of land for the following: 1. Short Subdivision. The division of land into nine or fewer lots, tracts, parcels, sites or divisions with a level of review that is proportional to the effect those lots may have on the surrounding area; 2. Subdivision. The division of land into 10 or more lots, tracts, parcels, sites or divisions with a level of review that is proportional to the effect those lots may have on the surrounding area; 3. Binding Site Plan. An alternative method of dividing property interests for nonresidential development and applying to the phased division of any land for sale or lease which is zoned for Ordinance 18-004 Page 3 of 9 DRAFT commercial, business, office, mixed-use, or industrial development, or which is to be developed as condominiums or a manufactured home park. (Ord. 09-002 § 1, 2009; Ord. 07-015 § 4, 2007). 20.20.020 Exemptions. A. The provisions of this titleTitle 20 SVMC shall not apply to: 1. Cemeteries and other burial plots while used for that purpose (RCW 58.17.040(1)); 2. _Divisions made by testamentary provisions or laws of descent (RCW 58.17.040(3)); 3. _A division of land for purpose of leasing land for facilities providing personal wireless services while used for that purpose (RCW 58.17.040(8)). B. The provisions of Titlethis chapter 20 SVMC shall not apply to the following; provided, that an exemption application for exemption and drawing consistent with subsection SVMC 20.20.020(C) of this section is provided submitted and approved teby the City: 1. Division of land into lots or tracts if such division is a result of subjecting a portion of the parcel or tract of land to either Cchapter 64.32 RCW (Horizontal Regimes Act) or Cchapter 64.34 RCW (Condominium Act) subsequent to the recording of a binding site plan for all such land (RCW 58.17.040(7)); 2. Division of land due to condemnation or sale under threat thereof, by an agency or division of government vested with the power of eminent domain; 3. Division or acquisition of land for public right-of-way; 4. A division of land into lots or tracts of less than three acres that is recorded in accordance with Cchapter 58.09 RCW, used or to be used for construction and operation of consumer- or investor-owned electric utilities to meet the electrical needs of a utility's existing and new customers as set forth in RCW 58.17.040(9). C. An application for exemption for any of the purposes set forth in SVMC 20.20.020(B) shall pursuant to subsection B of this section shall be processed to determine that whether the division is exempt with a minimum review for conformance compliance withte applicable adopted City regulations and ordinances. The application willshall be determined to be complete upon the submittal of the following materials: 1. An application; and 2. Maps, plans, and/or exhibits containing all applicable information as required by SVMC 20.30.020(B). (Ord. 09-002 § 1, 2009; Ord. 07-015 § 4, 2007). 20.20.030 Legal lot. Development shall be permitted only on legally created lots. A lot is created in compliance with applicable state and local land segregation statutes or codes in effect at the time the lot was created or binding site plan was approved including, but not limited to, demonstrating the lot was created through one of the following: A. Lots created through subdivision; on a plat approved by the City or Spokane County separately describing the lot in question; or B. Lots created through short subdivision on; a short plat approved by the City or Spokane County separately describing the lot in question; or C. Lots created pursuant to a binding site plan process in effect at the time the binding site plan was approved by the City or Spokane County; or D. A deed, contract of sale, mortgage, property tax segregation, plat, or recorded survey describing the lot in question if the instrument wasA division of land prior to March 13, 1978, provided that: 4. A tax segregation request was received by the Spokane County assessor's office prior to said date -Executed prior to March 21, 1980, for subdivisions (effective date of county's first subdivision ordinance) while the lot in question was under Spokane County jurisdiction; or 2. A legal instrument(s) pertaining to said division were filed of record prior to said date; and Executed prior to March 13, 1978 (effective date of county's first short subdivision ordinance), for short subdivisions while the lot in question was under Spokane County jurisdiction; or 3. All state and local land development regulations were met at the time the lot was created or can be met prior to the issuance of a building permit .Executed prior to July 1, 1969 (effective date of Chapter 58.17 RCW). (Ord. 09-002 § 1, 2009; Ord. 07-015 § 4, 2007). Ordinance 18-004 Page 4 of 9 DRAFT E. Development shall be allowed on a lot owned by an innocent purchaser. For purposes of SVMC 20.20.030(E), an "innocent purchaser" is an owner of the property, other than the original owner that created the lot, and who did not have actual notice that the lot was created by a means other than specified in SVMC 20.20.030(A -D). F. In the event a lot was created by a means other than as specified in SVMC 20.20.030(A -D). development shall be allowed on such lot if the development does not adversely affect the public interest. When determining the impact on the public interest, the City shall consider the following criteria-: 1. Whether the proposed development is consistent with the public health, safety, and general welfare; 2. Whether the use meets the underlying zoning requirements and is consistent with the use of at least one adjoining property; and 3. Whether the lot was created on, or before December 31, 2016. G. In the event an illegally created lot does not meet the criteria of SVMC 20.20.030(A -F), a development permit shall not be issued until such time that a legal lot is created. 20.20.040 Approval required prior to recordation. Any map, plat or plan, unless previously exempt, hereafter made of a proposed short subdivision, subdivision or binding site plan, or any part thereof, shall be presented for approval and be recorded as set forth in SVMC 20.40.030. _No such map, plat or plan shall be recorded or have any validity unless or until it has the approval of City departments and agencies with jurisdiction as required by this title. (Ord. 09-002 § 1, 2009; Ord. 07-015 § 4, 2007). 20.20.050 Prohibition against sale, lease or transfer of property. No person shall sell, lease or offer to sell or transfer any lot, tract or parcel subject to the requirements of this -aide 20 SVMC without first receiving approval hereunder by the City and recording the approved division with Spokane County; provided, that if performance of an offer or agreement to sell, lease or otherwise transfer a lot, tract or parcel of land is expressly conditioned on the recording of the subdivision, short subdivision or binding site plan containing the lot, tract, or parcel, the offer or agreement does not violate any provision ofTitle 20 SVMC. (Ord. 09-002 § 1, 2009; Ord. 07-015 § 4, 2007). 20.20.060 Vertical datum. Where topography is required to be shown, the land survey data must shall be based on the North American Vertical Datum (NAVD-88). (Ord. 09-002 § 1, 2009; Ord. 07-015 § 4, 2007). 20.20.070 Monumentation. Right-of-way, street centerline and street intersection monumentation shall be established as described by City -adopted street standards. In addition, for short subdivision, subdivision or binding site plans, every lot corner shall be marked or referenced in a permanent manner with the registration number of the professional land surveyor in charge of the survey in accordance with state law. (Ord. 09-002 § 1, 2009; Ord. 07-015 § 4, 2007). 20.20.080 Professional land surveyor. The preparation of all preliminary and final short subdivisions, subdivisions and binding site plans shall be made by or under the supervision of a professional land surveyor licensed in the state of Washington. The professional land surveyor shall certify on the final plat that it is a true and correct representation of the lands actually surveyed. A survey is required on all final plats. All surveys shall comply with Gchapter 58.09 RCW and Gchapter 332-130 WAC. (Ord. 09-002 § 1, 2009; Ord. 07-015 § 4, 2007). 20.20.090 General design. The design of short subdivisions, subdivisions and binding site plans shall conformcomply with -4e the requirements of all applicable City plans, regulations, and design and development standards. _In addition: Ordinance 18-004 Page 5 of 9 DRAFT A. The design, shape, size, and orientation of the lots shallee14 be appropriate for the use for which the divisions are intended, and the zoning and land use classification identified in the Comprehensive Plan of the area in which they are located. B. Lot Arrangement. 1. Side lot lines shall generally be perpendicular to public street rights-of-way, but may be within twenty degrees of perpendicular, or radial to the right-of-way in the case of curvilinear streets or cul-de- sacs. 2. Corner Lots. a. The lot lines at the intersection of two public streets shall be located a minimum of two feet behind the back of curb. b. At the intersection of two arterial streets (collector, minor or principal), the applicant may be required tosliall provide a widened border easement or right-of-way area behind the pedestrian ramp landing for the placement of traffic control devices and street lights, traffic signals, et cetera and their related appurtenances (see Figure 20.20.01). The limits of the border easement and right-of-way area shall be determined by the City at the time of application. This area shall not extend more than a minimum of 15 feet behind the landing. The boundary of this area may shall -be defined by an arc that is tangent at each end to the standard border easement, typically located behind the back of sidewalk, or right-of-way if there is no border easement in the vicinity. If this area is already fully contained within right-of-way then no additional border easement width wi-llshall be required. The only utilities allowed within this area are those necessary for the function of the proposed lights, signals et cetera._ Corner lots in single family or two family residential development shall have an average width at least 15 percent greater than the width of interior lots along both adjacent streets to permit building setback and orientation to both streets. Figure 20.20.01 8DRf1ER EASEIENT z La i p .rte 95` TANGENT L.ANDING— SIDEWALK RGGMT [9E Wear ARTERIAL ARTEP] AL CURE ` KIN. Ordinance 18-004 Page 6 of 9 DRAFT , ! a W ..0 B62OCR EASEMENT 4. "° rGENr -L7wG SHIEVALk Hp:kr OF VA` AQTERl._ 3. Lot Dimensions. a. Lot dimensions shall comply with the minimum standards established in Chapter 19.7040SVMC; b. Flag lots are prohibited. Reverse flag lots providing access to alleys or amenities located to the rear of the property are permitted; c. No lot shall have an average depth greater than three times its average width. 4. Double Frontage Residential Lots. a. Double frontage and reverse frontage lots shall be avoided except permitted only where necessary to separate residential development from arterial roadway or to overcome specific disadvantages of topography and orientation; b. When lots back to arterials, e screening device shall be installed on the lot(s) limiting visibility between the arterial and the adjoining lots in accordance with Chapter 22.70.070 SVMC; c. No building, except buildings designed and constructed as two-family dwellings or one -family attached dwellings, shall be constructed on or across existing lot lines. Where buildings are designed and constructed on or across lot lines, the building shall be located so that the common wall separating the individual living units is located on and along the common lot lines of the adjoining lots. C. Block dimensions should shall reflect due regard to the needs of convenient access, public safety, connectivity, emergency vehicle access, topography, road maintenance, and the provision of suitable sites for the land use planned. 1. Block Length. Block length shall bercomply with the adopted street standards. 2. Block and Lot Labeling. Blocks and lots shall be identified in sequential numerical order. 3. Street alignments shall be designed and constructed with appropriate consideration for existing and planned streets, anticipated traffic patterns, topographic and drainage conditions, public safety, adopted street standards, Comprehensive Plan and the proposed use of the land so divided. D. When a tractland is subdivided into lots of one acre or more in size, the CM may require an arrangement of the lots and streets, in conformance pliance with the adopted arterial and local access ! : ! subsequent redivision. E. Lots shouldshall not be divided by the eCity boundary or public right-of-way, and shall not be divided by -f any city, county, zoning designation, or public right of way unless exceptional circumstances exist-. F. Every lot shall have direct access to a paved public street, private street, or an easement for a private driveway. G. Prior to filing the final short subdivision, subdivision or binding site plan application, the applicant shall improve or make appropriate provisions for the construction of the public or private streets, alleys or private driveways that provide access to lots being created through the short subdivision, subdivision, or binding site plan consistent with applicable City -adopted standards. H. Wastewater design shall be in compliancecomply with all applicable City regulations and other jurisdictional agency regulations. I. Adequate public domestic water supply and/or fire protection shall be provided in compliance with all applicable City regulations and other jurisdictional agency regulations. Ordinance 18-004 Page 7 of 9 DRAFT J. All road designs shall be in confonnancecomply with Cchapter 22.130 SVMC and adopted street standards. K. Provisions for stormwater runoff shall be in complyianco with City regulations for stormwater management as set forth in Gchapter 22.150 SVMC. �. Existing and proposed easements for electric, water, sewer, gas, and similar utilities shall be illustrated on the short plat, plat, or binding site plan. The utility purveyors shall indicate to the community and public works development ddepartment (hereafter referred to as the "department") in writing that the easements are adequate for their service needs. M. The short subdivision, subdivision, or binding site plan shall provide for the location of underground utilities within public rights-of-way, border easements, alleys or utility easements including, but not limited to, those for electricity, communications and street lighting. When conditions make underground installation impractical, the dircctorCity Manager may waive the requirement for underground utilities. (Ord. 12-008 § 1, 2012; Ord. 09-002 § 1, 2009; Ord. 07-015 § 4, 2007). 20.20.100 Findings. Prior to approving any preliminary short subdivision, subdivision or binding site plan, the department in the case of short subdivisions and binding site plans or the hearing examiner in the case of subdivisions, shall determine and make written findings of fact that appropriate provisions are made for the following: A. The public health, safety, and general welfare; B. Open spaces; C. Drainage ways; D. Streets or roads, alleys, sidewalks, and other public ways; E. Transit stops; F. Public potable water supplies; G. Sanitary sewer; H. Parks and recreation; I. Playgrounds, schools and school grounds; J. Sidewalks and other planning features that assure safe walking conditions for students who only walk to and from school; K. Whether the public interest will be is served by the short subdivision, subdivision, and binding site plan; L. The proposed short subdivision, subdivision or binding site plan is in conformity with all applicable development code provisions; and M. Other requirements found to be necessary and appropriate and for which written standards and policies have been adopted. (Ord. 09-002 § 1, 2009; Ord. 07-015 § 4, 2007). 20.20.110 Attached single-family subdivisions. Applications for an attached single-family subdivision consisting of nine or fewer lots shall be submitted and processed according to the requirements for content and form for preliminary and final short subdivisions and process as stated in Gchapters 20.30 through 20.40 SVMC. Application for an attached single-family subdivision consisting of 10 or more lots shall be submitted and processed according to the requirements for content and form for preliminary and final subdivisions as stated in Cchapters 20.30 through 20.40 SVMC. Application for alterations of any preliminary short subdivision or subdivision shall be submitted and processed according to the requirements of €chapter 20.50 SVMC. Applications for alterations of any final short subdivision or subdivision shall be submitted and processed according to the requirements of Cchapter 20.60 SVMC. Applications for vacation of any plat shall be submitted and reviewed according to the requirements of €chapter 20.70 SVMC. (Ord. 12-008 § 2, 2012; Ord. 09-002 § 1, 2009). Section 5. Other sections unchanged. All other provisions of SVMC Appendix A and Title 2- SVMC not specifically referenced hereto shall remain in full force and effect. Ordinance 18-004 Page 8 of 9 DRAFT Section 6. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance shall be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, clause or phrase of this Ordinance. Section 7. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect five days after publication of this Ordinance or a summary there in the official newspaper of the City of Spokane Valley as provided by law. Passed by the City Council this day of , 2018. ATTEST: L.R. Higgins, Mayor Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Approved as to Form: Office of the City Attorney Date of Publication: Effective Date: Ordinance 18-004 Page 9 of 9 FINDINGS ANI) RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE SPOKANE VALLEY PLAN INC C'OMMTSSIDN CAA. -2017-0003 • Proposed Amendment to Spokane Virilr<y Municipal Code (SVMC) Pursuant to SVMC 17,80,150 (E) the Planning Commission shall consider the proposal and shalI prepare and forward a recamniencation to the City Council following the public hearing. The following findings are consistent .t.ith the Thinning Commission recommendation that City Council adopt the amendment. 1. Background: Pursuant to RCW 36,70,A 1.30, Spokane Valley adopted its 2016 Comprehensive Plan Update aild aapdaleri development regulations on December 13, 2016, with December 2Ii, 2016 as the effective date. CP'A-2017-0003 is a City initiated code text amendment to SVMC Chapter 2010; Central Provisions to address naso -legal lots and iruFiccrll purchasers; eliminate inconsistencies with Title 19 resulting from the Development Regulations update. in 2.016; and piovide. clarifications and minor grammatical cEiariges; and modify the definition of flag lot in Appendix A. 'l'he Planning Con.lniissica held a public Bearing and conducted deliberations on December 14, 2017. TlUri 11 the public hearing deliberation the Planning Commission discussed whether the language allowing an innocent purchaser to develop on a non-fegal lot would imply other development rights. Specifically, the Commissioners licit the criteria added in SSC 20,2.0.030(F)() lulplictl that any proposed development could be allowed on a non -legal lot if it was consistent with the use of of least one adjoining property, The Planning Commission's concern was that al use: inconsistmt with tilt: am&rlyi.ng :tone: may be expanded under this provision. A c aange was proposed that would modify the criteria i n SCMC 20.20.010(F)(2) to include a requitement emit the use must comply with underlying zoning requirements for the site and be consistent with otic use ofat least one adjoining property. The Planning C')inIni ion also, discussed i'yo additional proposal changes. to the drat), amexidaucnt language. itie 1'rrst change would reword the language in SVMC 20.20.090(B)(4)(a), changing the proposed amendment language From "prohibited t xcepl." to "permitted only", The second change would modify SVMC 20.20.09Q:13x2)(h) and Figure 20.20.01 to allow city staff more flexibility in determining right-of-way and border c ricin~ nt requirements. The Commissioners voo J 6-1 le recommend that the City Connell adopt the elmendiraelil and iucludc Ilia~ proposed changes to the amendment language. 2. Planning CORIrrllssirira F1 ii 1iugs The City may approve amendments to the SVMC if it finds that the amendment is consistent with the applicable provisions of the Comprehensive Plan and bears s #1 substantial relation to public health, safely, welfare, and protection of the environment The proposed amendment is consistent with thetbElov.'ing Comprehensive Plan Goals and Palacio: Economic Policy .l U -I'6 — Promote the development or redevelopment of vacant and aindeeiu1ilizvd properties, particularly those with potential to serve as a catalyst for ccon0113i0 development. b. Land IJsas Goal LU -G1 Maintain and enhance the character and quality of li.Ce in Spokane Valley, e. Land Use Genal LTJ -(]4 13riswrc: that land use plans, regulations, review processes, and [ran irnJ:.rovenacaits salpport. cvmimic growth and vitality. d. Land Use Polity .0-P5 Insane compatibility between ndjaoent residential and commercial or industrial al SOS. bIniiiika iChLIR4NA51111ktarLlh ,14111i1ofth Sn}ulu5ti, VrdlryPtuniiIrr ctulitttiIysleillirrA•2017O0d3 Page 11.111 e. Lund Use Policy 7.0-P7— Protect neighborhoods from incompatible bund use rind arlvonse itnpacts associated with trunspt rtcttirin currid ors. f. Transportation Goal T-02 — Etrsrri'+M that transportation planning efforts reflci.t autiaipnlcxd land tir c l altcrns and support identified growth xipporturritics. g. Transportation Policy `l`-1'2 Consider neighborhood traffic and Livability conditions anti acldre:ss potential adverse impacts Eat pub! is and private projects during Ilio planning, designing, permitting, and construction! phases. "I' iiiispor[trtk n Policy T P9 — Provide and maintain quality street, sidewalk, and share l -use bath slit -Canes that provide a safe environment for all users. The Planning Commission recommended that the City Council approve the proposed omendrnent, Conclusion: The proposed text kmiendrneut is tonsistuiit with Comprehensive Plan and bears a substantial relation tea put lie. bca101, safety, welfare, and protection of the: envirouniclll. 3, Recommendation: I'Iya Spokane. Volley Planning Conun issioiitherefore recommends the Courtcil adoptCTA-20 I. 7-0003 as Iiiuctitiod, a proposed amendment to the SV C, Approved this 11'° day of January, 2018 Planning Commission Chairni:sn ATTEST Deanna Horton, Admini tantive Assistant i:lud[ng$ eifid [#ecarnnIAndat1l3A. flirLiht Spusauc v-.dlcyPlannlug fion7mis5"s1:111cJ -fL 17-0gm3 Page 2 oft T. Chair Graham called the the pledge of rrtleglifirce. Frosoi 'Heather G raha tri James Johnson Tim Kelley Mike Phillips Michelle Hasmussen SUZaniW Slalltos Matt Walton i innteq Spalm no \'ialloy P1 inrrirrg (2omruIa:iiriu Cu i ncil Climatal; mmink — City Hull Novntmrlanr.1i9, 24117 tuee;tit to Oder at ta0.) p.m. Conimi ioaea;s, staff and awdierico stood Car Steretaiy Deanna Horton look roil ami Shy following members and staff were Cary Driskell, City Attorney Lori Btulesw, Senior fi;inlier Marty Palaniuk, Planer Mary Swank, (office Assistant 1}4:ynna Horton, Secretary for the Corninias;inru 11. AGENDA: Coin niiision er Johnson moved to accept the November 9, 2017 agenda as Iprercnted. The vote cm the motion iMY euera Fre frrr 1, for er atom and iiie motion rO,-. erT TIT, MINUTES; Cotnmisione:r Johnson moved to approve the June 22, 2017 orotates as presented. The vale le to approve fire* motion to approve the minutes wag seven infrrvro, a:e n ENafarsa', rine 'w rm flosses. .1V. ar'[ IMMlSSTON RFPDT4TS1 C iiuri issiauers Johnson and Gatlin ru repot to d they Ii s,d attended sovcra I City C'uun' it meetings daring the last Blur months bill hsc1 DOL participated on anything which related to planning commission business. V_ AI)MINISTRATi[VE REPORT: ScniorPhinnur Lori Barlow said the City had received four privately initialed Comprehensive. Plana amendments. Siafi'will be taking tliu_n forward to Council for review of [ha (Mels ,ort titers be bringing Them to the Planning Conivaission in order to process tliciu though the review and rte caiaainendntioan ptc ocss, City Alkorney Cairy Driskei] ;also commented his office land been tivutk[ng un updates on small cell technology which allows cel I. phone companies to ]uc ata 5G technology in the public rights-or•way. His office will be biingn,g forward changes to the municipal cridu ELIong with training and changes to current franchise agreements, VT, PUBLIC COI' h1LN'fl 'Iliere was no public comment. VII. COMMISSION BUST 9iSS Fr) Strictly Session: CCA -24I7-0003, A proposed amendment. la the Spokane Valley Meutiieipal Code regarding subdivision general provvsiom9. Planner Iviarly Pnlar;in1c pru6uai1I Ll to fire Commissioners the proposod amendments to Spolame Valley Munioirrrl ('ode (SVMC) chapter 20,20, He stated when the development regulations Mkt lochitud in 2016; it created Raiile utcenosistencles iaa SVMC chapter 20,20, which need to be corrected. The amendment will eltarify !Iowa lesg;il Jol is wanted, eliminate the rcgttii meat that n cornea lot needs be 15 percent larger than other lots in the sulidivisinr;, remove tho Int duptlr unci width requirement, and redefines a flag lent. The proposed amendment al -' o rnrnnvcar the iegwirenieot far artr€rLs end lots to be laid out for the possibility of future slrwerts. 'Hu also amid there is clE:tin up of grammar and changes in wording to make things more enncise. Mr. PoiatIiuk explained thai the City haa dciyieled to uge the date of March 13, 1978 as a benchmark to determine n legal lot. Spokane County uses the same dale in their regulations. Any lot created prior to this dare by a deed, is considered [regally created_ After this date, the lot moist ii ve gone: through a proper subdivision process to be ucatasidered at luggal lot. An. npplicaant will need to Iorov i de ti legal document showing Flow th4 bt was mated. Cununisylerntit1'h1tli}as expressed concent over easing the ward prohibited rather tliun ttvuis[ed in ce njuiiotion with double frontage lots. He fell that prohibited meant it wouldn't he allowed, and asked Bow an exception could he given in the next slitenient. Ms. Barlow stated in certain situations double frontage lots ;lire the only de_cign Folutirni. The ekeeption allows lhosc Co9ulitian 7017-11-09 IF[FuiEihig 4`uonnitidun Pnxe 7S of7. to be reeognited. Double frontage lets fire prohibited, iuyiesn thEt is die only way to develrrp n lrieec ul prtrpurty, Chu iu Ciitrsu rases, it ivctiuld be allowed. Mx. Phillips said he didn't like the uhEingiiig ol'the word from avoid to prohibited ss he was coiwcrncti they y would not bo allowed ander any 4bircuinsnnwes. Mi'. Driskeil said there is no way to enforce avoid, but the City call Unforec piuhibllutl. Dated on the cliscosdo I sr<tffwIil look Irl this lopie more. VIII. GOOD OF 'Fl -IE ORDER: Commissioner GraihGim staled h a -U i -a WLI iip art iiw end orthis year, and she would not be s king reappointment. IX. ADJOURNMENT: Commissioner Jnlinnon moved to adjourn the 'sleeting at tS:45 p.m. Tire yore 1}11 the motion irtm: nrmumr.1ars firm; io motion passel ActfityiJ 4 ) thine( Oialieitl; Chair J:iaile signed ID C3 tna Horton, Scerein ry Minutes Sp 'thane Valley Planning Commission Council Chaambers — City I±uit l)eceitt ber 14, 2017 Chair Graham ca]itxl the meeting to order at 6:02 p.m. Commissioners, staff and audience stood for [tic plcdgc of allegiance. Secretary Deanna Horton look roll tirrd the following tncarabcrs and stair were present: Heath cr Grnhaiati Cary 1)rislcell, City Attorney Ja111Q3 Johnson mill Plc Ibig, City Engineer lam 14LHky Marty l'alaaniuk, Plainer Mike Phillips limy Allen, Engineer iv9icheIle Rasniu cn Ray Wright, Senior Tratlic Engineer Suzanne Stathos (Adria M:iril:r., Swint Engineering Manager Niall W:rllon Deanna Ilotion, Secretary for the Commission 11. AGENDA; DA: Connor sioncr Johnson ancav'ad to accept the December 14, 2017 agenda as presented. 7 err ti,ote. On 'he uaoatr)rr wcL4 Srr'latt rrlJbV01l a erre against and the umtlan passed, III, MINUTES; Commissicrfcr Johnson moved to approve the November 9, 2017 minutes as presetitud. 77w ate a,toar1 n fo aJ L ' the ar;laaufes aura's seven nfavor, zero c airs, a, crracl the moriatt pissed. i CommiSSJ1 }1 BEFOR'1'S; The Commissioners had no reports, V. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT There wain Mier tuirrMiaaiSaa7oliVe reprl. VI. PLI RI iC C [)M F I N'l`; "['here was no public comment. ViI. COMMISSION BUSINESS; i) l'lihtic nearing: C.TA-2017-0003, A proposed amendment fu the aSptilraine Valley Municipal Code regarding subdivision general provisions. Chair Graham read the rules for is publit: hearing and opcaacsl ttae tnihIic hearing at 6!05 p.nl, Planner Marty Palaniuk presen0utl llrs pinpnscd amendments to Spokane Valley M,rnit•.ipait Coda: (SVNIC) chapter 20.24. ile explained when the development rt tiplatitnz� woic ripdated In 2016 It created some inconsistencies in SVMC chatter 20.20 which need to be coaiected. The amendment will clarify how a legal lot is created, eliminate the requirement lha: a corner Int needs tti lac. 15 percent larger than othe=r lots in a subdivision, reinove the lot depth and width requirement, fan+_t redefines a [lad tut, ' 'tic proposed amendment also removes the requ irame:at for iivi sii m tri ctlrafnrm with future planning documents and provide for possible future strcrvts. The update includes a clettin-up (of grammar coal Elgill ges in wording for consistency. In 1969 Washington state developed the slihdivision process to divide praperty and create lots. Prior to that a lot could be created by a boundary line adlusircc<nl sn' by a. aleucl. Spok,Firac. County adopted subdivision regulations in 1978. Mr. Prrlataiuk explained that the City has decided to use the date ofMaareli 11, 1978 as a benchmaaikto determine a legal lot, Spa kcute (._'.curly uses Ifac smile date In their regulations. Any lot created prior to this date by a decd, is considered legally created. Alter this dale, [lie lea[ must have gonethrough a proper subdivision proce :s to hc.ccsaasid+rescl ¢a Jc t ial lot_ An applicant will need to provide i feraI document showing how the lot was created,, The Cvrrnsaissanraers ilist`iGpccd the provis[ons for SVMC 20.20.30 (E) 1rltauecan purchaser. This section provides pr.lmtiuti for seinctrne who unknowingly ingly purchases a lot which was not erented legally. This allows the innocent purchaser to put a haaildn on lhral. property_ Commissioner -Phillips was concerned sti it oiio would try in use this I]I,1cc`ss to commit fraud. Mr. Driskell stated this would not apply to any ]ut created after 1978, however staff will research this to ineke sure this could not occur. It was p[Jiro ctsi Oil! tfsi 4 watsul{l only *ply to lois created prior to 2016. ( o1T aniesioner Johnson had ai question regaarding 1VMC. 207.211.30 (2)(2), rrhelher the Ilse is arisisient-with the use c+ 'a lea.it one. ue4r ihhng properly. t li= concern., in the case o1`aan inno'mo 2017-12-14 Nanning Cnmmi sic+ hrtinurca: 1' :c 21}ri purchaser, was someone could comic in and request to place a use on Muir property, because it is allowed on an axijuinaing property which was not consistent with the smTt otimlirtg rruiglalrcrrlrnod. Mr, t'ailrairiuk replied the use WOL1kI ll Live to he consistent with :he underlying knifing. This could not be used uhangu lift ,earning. Commissioners Johnson and Walton felt the wording + olid not rneet. iie inlr:ait The flag lot d4:f nition relies on the front lot dimension. The pike posed definition does mot rely on any width requirerents, and retrieves any lot dimensions fOr a Lag lot. Rather than allowing at flag lot for access, the City will require an easement tir:wss piopei1y" Mr. PnlaniL1k said u developer v+i 11 i ut corners developing a fluff; tut. The amendment rernovas the requirement for land to be Met aide for the development yrfrtlnare streets the City might nut boll&, 'i'lris set aside is based on the arterial street plan. 1t also removes the tutufie arxlu`siliem area requirements aunt the municipal code. A change to ihu amount of egise..rmoni fora corner lot where two aiturial streets meet is proposed to allow stafftri determine the appropriate amount, whiLli es cRrin less tart rhe current regtiircfnent" l'[iu r+;st of the changes update referenet and consistency in language. Commissioner Oraltuto, seeing no one who wished to testii'y, closed the public hearing al 6:32 p.m. ('c+rn,Trissrnricr,ToI+ttl,soii asked to discaisi 20,20,020 (E) and (F)(2) regarding the innocent purchases and extending } land use into incompatible zones. He said Ile felt that the language will allow a rise from adjoining property on pile pr fi rtv" Fie requested language be arlcled that the use must be allowed within the rn1dtrlying 7.0110. Commissioner 'Walton hiatal it. would resolve his issue: with dime duns as .vuell, Mr. Pattmitik stated dcvcthisir1L'nt, as It is tefeu'td 10 Iii this case, meant a building. 1f someone, wiinted to suhdivlde it, they would have to comply with the subdivision regtnremcnis. Staff would cheek /Diking, find enforce those zoning requirements. The Commission lei! the Crtrr+°nk lfirrgvage was oat 5p n1.1 e: cricrrx 1. rt i' the public to understand. Mr- Driskell c lc[1 the following language to Reit] tr, (1)(2) ,vheffrer the proposed use ax consislefrl ivUli ffir m f crit actiobling prrverfy, and edso consistent with the underlying zoning. The Commission fell this satisfied their issue Wilk [his piucc lar tlic amendment. Commissioner lissioner SuatI os asked about the removal of'the future ire u+.sitinil areas. 1v r. Driskell2,.iated it is not fir to require land to be set ; 1dc, 'without any possibility cif ck:vt,lnpn}erit, fill' the dovelnpruent of future toads which the City did not have the funds Lci build or in ti-te near future. Corniraisssnner Johnson asked ahouL the proposed change to SV C 20.20,090 General Design. These are proposal changes being suggested by tate Engineering. . Division. lnuniT5.1[Hier Waltat3 caked why the language re a di ng the easement for as r;.urzaer tot at two m ite:tints wsrLs changing from shall to may be required.. Gloria Mantz, Engineering Marragei-, stated it currently yu1Les [here varill ba; ra 15 -foot casement for traffic. equipment. She said there are limes when they don't need 15 foul, sometimes they only need (lye fist, sometirues none al all, 'Phis allows engineering the flexibility to look trLoh aituatiarti and snake a deterrninatiiN1 at that time. The Corrarnissioar er crr,ief fhc.t' liked the .oposed enact , as well la changing the rrrrilchingfigivv" ComTr1 ssionerlohnson asked iithe t;:cma ni sion agreed to the pr'oposcrt amigo to 20"20.070 (13)(4) language from "shall" to " per-mittnd oj' "" The Commission discussed double iion[rat c i nix, arid ogr•r:ed to "permitted only" language. Comm isskiller Qrrthum moved to forward to [he City Counc[I CTA -2017-0003, with the firllotvirig changes adding to SVMC 20.20.030 (F)(2) "whether tth propr's'eri use is corrsisfenl with the use of «n 6uir pining property, arid riINvr iiddh the rr:;r r'r-f}'rnzonh ," and all others us- presc:rttccl" Tho' ucmirr iiia orae m tion W six infer+r; 0116 u, rairrsf, with Commissioner LV i fr,n dissenting. Li) $Ludy ge. lois CTA211?-014104,. A proposed ameualrnerrlls le the Spokane Valley Sit'ixl Stnndtit�als. Engineer Henry A11i.n explained to the Comrni sioti the Street Standards need to he changed regarding some time sensitive 4hiing cs which need to be made Leath i. of some federal projects. 2017-12-14 !'tanning Commission Mireitex Trite 3 of 3 'I'hc Street Standards, which derme Prow public and private infrastructure is built, was adopted in 2009 and has only had minor changes to it since that time, S orti c i] f t I re changes are for consistency,. and language. Mr. Allen also explained stiff is reviewing the Street Standards and would be returning at a figure date with a comprehensive update. 'I`hc pilinriay reason for they update was comments received from the J'cdcral Highway Admnais]niki i (FHWA) concerning the ability of the City to maintain aidcwalks. The FHWA wanted the City to nr;ike sums when a property owner does not innintain their sicicwollk the City has the proper anti milt' Ici gT in and fix it. This change is neeessurry in order Ibr the City to continuer to r+:ccive grants for road projects. Generally, the update will make the language in the standards consistent with changes to stall jo,itie1ns that occurred with the reorganivation and Implementation of the standards. Other substantive cliingcs prcipngcd include removing relerenoes tai variances and future acrlcIisiticrn aims, hinny sIampru itions were changed in tiro rcttrga,til+sitiOn, ltut ,MSC [tic references stiII rcrnaiur in the municipal code. 'film rure.renees have bceii ch_1nged ler [Ire criLy manager. her. Driskell commented ihe, rutixon for this i.s the city manager has the ulli mate authority, but delegates it In other elarirloyees to p riin3T] the work, There will IN ii public hearing on the proposed changes January 25, 2018. VIJ1. GOOD OF THE ORDER: 'till's vies. Ct i I kitIlitiq ioner Grahanfg Iasi. Stair and the Commissioners thanked C:oiT Trtisrsinner Graham for her tittiteserVing IIsi City WS #r Cotrunisstoner, Conrmia iotaer Walton stated he agreed to all or tim proposed changes for CTA-20l74CO3 however he wanted to be a dissenting voice should there be a ireecl for a reconsidera+l+im, Ix, ADJOURNMENT; Commissioner Jsrhnwon moved to adjourn the meeting gat 7;48 part. Tire vote ora dee tarcadk n was tills raftrrrne in fiwwu', and flee' motionpassrrr! Heather Ur hata, Clair Date signed Demure Horton, Secretary 11Ji11(1(es Spokane Valley Planning Commission Council Chumberws — Cit} Hall January 11, 20m Viet! Clwait Johnson called the meeting to order al 6:02 p.m. Commissioners, staff and audience sto d for the p[edge of allegiance. Sceretary Deanna 1 foitnn took roll r.nd the fallowing members and stuff wc,re present. James Johnson Danielle Ktlschmitter, absent, excused J'itn T elley, abseni, exeused Mike Phillips IvIk.hollc Rasmussen Suzanne Staattina Matt Walton Erik Lamb, Deputy City Attorney Lori Barlow, senior Planner Marty Pc,hetiut:, Planner Henry 1111ur7, F.nglncer Ray Wri gal, Senior' Traffic Engineer Gloria Ment, Senior Engineering Manager Rod 1 liggins, Mayor Deanna Horton, Secretary y for the Coxninis.1ion 1T AGENDA: Commissioner Rasmussen moved Lo accept the January I I, 2018 agenda as presented. The rota erre to rtlr.rfio,t 7arrs f use ter f asps+', zerrr igate t i and the motion pas sed: 111. MIN Li TES: Commissioner Rasmussen moved to approve the December 14, 2017 minutes as presented, The vote on the ?nation avers five in frnvor, aero crgrn ns', the n coliOn. j a '-+r t . 1V: comivrissroN REPORTS: "rite Commissioners had no reports. V. ADMiINISTRATIVC REI1ORR'1': Senior Planner i.oax Barlow noted Danielle Kaschinitter had been appointed to the: Platirning Commission to replace l feather Cullum al tins January 9, 2018 City Council meeting. She also shared the advanced agenda with tho Commissioners and discussed upcoming sal. jecis which will appear bifbr^c them: Comprehensive Plan amendments and fa text calttendment to change the one acre requirement for animal keeping back to 40,000 square feet which was changed in the update to the development regulations, 4'7. F[Tlil IC C(}tVI.NMLN'P: Rod Higgins. Spokane Valley Mayor — Mr. i IigRins thanked the Commissioners for a job well done last year. He said he bad heard the Commissioners felt they in: lit have been undelworked, but he assured them their mission was very itraportnnil. TTc Ra id the job of the Coratlaaission is to screed things the City Council And it makes their -jobs casicr. I -le commented tlaaat laately the Council has tollnwed the recommendations of the Planning t:c,tr1rnils*iucr, ich inrlicatws they kava done a thorough job. Vll. COMMJSSJON BUSINESS: i, Flection of Officers Secretary Deanna Horton reminded the Commission that only Commissioners who had servcxl more than otic year would he eligible to serve as the Chair or the Vice Chair orf the Commission. Ms. Horton then called for nornivationc for the office of Chair. Mr. Phillips nominated Ms. .Rasmussen, w'hc- accepted the nomination. Ms. Rasmussen nominated Ivfr. Johnson, he declined the nomination. L laving no other nominations 'voting, by a show of hands, four in favor and one against, Ms. Rasmussen dissenting, Ms. Rasmussen was voted to the; office of Planning Commission Chair for 2018. Ms, 1 fs rton ten accepted nominations for the position ofVk.c.Chair. Mr- Phillips nominated Mr. Johnson, who amopted the nomination_ I laving no other nominations, voting by a show of hands, [vc in favor and rianrr against, Mr. Johnson was olceik:d to the position ot" Vice Chair for 20/8. Ms. Rasmussen Chen continued to lead the ntcctir g. Planning Commission Findings of Fact for CT, -2017.01103, A pr'r►pns .d amendment (u the Spokane Volley I'Junic•iiiat Code regarding suliriivisiou gttmerfrl provisions. 201YI-0I-11 Planning commissEonMinutes Page 2of4 Planner Marty Pal ahruuk explained the; Findings of Fact had been drafted based on the recommended changes the Harming Commission hod voted on at the public hearing and then incorporated into the aamendtnnctit to *hove forward to the City Council. C'ermards,s(oner Johnson proved lo approve flw Planning CnrrirnL ..Lion AilldhigS of Fart Po. C1.4- 2617-(1(103, 1 hie role on the morir.rix was fore in fervor, zero tiii mprxssecI_ iii. Public Hearing, Street Sliinrliii'ds Update Chair Rasmussen opcneld the public hearing at 6:17 p.m. Ellgii eer Henry y Allen explained the City's Stroet Standards, which are the stnndaards that guide the cleveloptnent of politic and private, Infrastructure, Mr. Allen explained the changes to the Stat standards were initialed to address tura Federal Highway Aelrr]inrstrattion'as concern regarding Chapter 1(1.2.1 and the City's ability to maintain ra'sidewalk if the property owner should fail to do so. The Street Staanelayrils are also being updnted to alimin;,te City positions-vhiclh no longer exist and change them Lo refer to the City tvlanagr, r, wlio lr;as ultimate authority but delegates it to oilier staff members in the City to perforile. Some of the other claatnntls include cliirrinsaiing the variance process, FAA and Mylar record drro,vings, no longer requiting streets to connect to future; development, frontage improvements only where a project accesses a street. Chapter 3 as being updated to allow limited trtafl'lc impact analysis for SEPA 1111111 There ore also proposed ehangus to the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SYNC) 20.0,010 and 22.130 to remove references rences to fibrae acquisition irCrc4 #][ld revise SVMC 22.130 to rep nated positions. Commissioner Rasmussen questioned why on page 3-14 which references ccsllisir n history; the word `peril' was being struck. Senior Traffic Engineer Ray Wright explained the City provides llie collision bistoe-ytothe outside engirl[xrs when they creed to do a traffic analysis and the City always provides the most cumin information. She also named that on page 6-3 the word `ousts` needs to be changed to cuts, on page 1-2 adopted is in the sentence twice. Chair Rasmussen then open the hearing up for die 1 uhlic to comment. Vicki Donsahaie, 323 S Bvwciialii Ms. Donahue stated she lives at the interscelion orf 4" Ave and 13owdish Rd. This is a buoy intersection and there are many accidents which occur there. She is ills° Cnneerned about the school children walking along these roads. She feels there should be a traffic control tic:vice al. this intersection, slowing }7eoplc on TIcrwdish, improving 4'1' Ave, She also stated shelled received a letter repo-ding snow removal. She said they 5hC.IVO. but then the plow cornea along and puts Ilio, it riglht back on the sidewalk.. Paul Taylor, 323 S ] ,dish; Mir_ Taylor said the leaves and the gullets did not get cleaned out along the road, so when the snow raells there is no place for the water to ga. He commented there is toe much traffic on that (flowdish) road, it needs a safety control device_ I le said it is not can we have it, it is do something about il. Seeing no one elle Alin Wished to testify, Chau" Rnsm. aisscn closed the public hearing at 6;37 p.m, Commissioner S1adios stated she could see the iommernter's voiat ot'view because 4111 Avcnnic is busier all the time. She would like to see more stop lights along it. She said 44' Avenue is how everyone avoids Sprague but with all the apartments along it now„ it is dangerous. Commissioner Johnsen said he agreed regarding 4'1' Avenue. Control ionet Philips commented 10.1 sys The City is rot responsible for rrrriiiitenanCe of the sidmv iks. He ootniiauuuled he has a problem with a citizen having to replace the sidev miik if it becomes damaged. He feels il should be part of"the City's maintenance iiru rain a{r repair the s[dowel ks, espeeirilly if they ar'c inside the right-Hyl-way or a bonier ulsem Lnt. I Ie felt maintenance should be e xplained better_ Ile also commented bo tilos li p]inbk111 with shoveling the iielewalks and then the. plow conies along and puts the snow hack and the City turning arui1Itd slid fining Koti.neone because there is soca* on the sidewalk. Ms. Barlow reminded tiro Crinylnissinnrrs the reason for 1Iic change in the language: in this section is due to the comments received rilarii the Federal Highways Administration and without it, it could affect the City's ability to receive grants in t1ir. future. 201WW11-11 Planning Cummibsion NI inors Page 3 or'4 Mr. Allen stated that when the Street Standards were adopted, they spoke to nuerty jurisdictions regairtiing the can; of sidewalks, and the idea of citizens main'_raining Ike sidewalk iir Boort ref their homes or businesses is not unique to our Cily. The City inherited this language from Spekatno County but many other juris.iictinns in and around the state have the seine =quit -moot, 11. would } a huge expense and under taking for the City to have in maintain hundreds of milers of sidewalk.. Commissioner Walton confirmed the snow shoveling vas not in the Street Standards but was to separate ordinance from what was currently being considered. lie wondered how the expense year repairing or ',enlacing a sidewalk was determined. Mr. Lamb explained the City is required to get NA; for itt public' works projects and required to accept the lowest bid. Based on lhis, lin: citizen would only Ile billed tar the actual work and we would have an invoice for the vrrprlc which was performed. Commissioner Phillips fell thai maintenance 'WM Hot .berry defined in section 10.2.1. Commissioner Johnson stated t1ut he also felt it did not cle- u'ly define rrrairttenanec however felt changing it rttiglt: he better handled in a figure update. Mr. I.. utrb ot°icred adding to the end of the sentence `properly owners arc responsible for the maintenance of these features as described below.' The Commissioners agreed this change would satisfy their concerns. 'oonontssiora+ttr .1'nhninn moved to approve the staff recommended changes to the tiara aic!pal code and the, Spokane YaTTey Street cat Stundarc as proposed -with the follnt ring changes, ree'I.5'lratrrlru do sur.rivri 10.2.1 e_ ' mgi1ig the .second Sentence of tette second p[ra'rrgrupla by «drirrrg► enc described hvloir'tothe end eftinesmience. Street S'dandeo sxr}dtlnrr 1.3.2,'bird bullet ensure public; fay [lilies great level of servke sta nd;mik adopted in the Comprehensive Plan, SF ,C 22.1.30 eh 7ngv nevelopmen1.5'rrrvicer Senior Engineer to City Itianarger. The rife on the motion ,getslvr ii fen}or, zero against, the ntofionflossed. iv. Study Session Wireless Small Cell Technology Deployment: Mr. Lamb gave ti prescntation to explain to the Commission wireless small cell techrtning , Most lvir'els cell phone traffic is currently Handled by the large monopoles, 1 tistorically the City has only dealt with the monopoles which have been located c.n private property. The City was contaetcd by a Tvlobilite, company connected will' Sprint, regarding small cell sites in late 2015leiiit 2016. The City joined fl oxen. ctrtirrnt of numerous cities in 2016 to become wore educated in haat the sniall cell technology is and how it will.i'fuct us. Lt its u tiurn developed `model franchise' agreements area `model development regult'itinns' for the deployment of small cell sites. The City has been working with Verizon. MCI "fele com, and Msbilite mgarding the use a f' Spokaiic \' 1 l ey rights-of-way for small cell d pin'yi nen!, Tho City has developed draft franchise agreements and regulations Mated to small cell deployments. Current 3 air 40 (gruel lion) icchnG10 y k when a hared held 'device coumuiiii ales with the large monopole. The farther you get from the monopole the less .r.liablc the signal is. Monopoles ctin only accept so Batch data at one time, Sentell cell technology would be adding antennas in the. righ of -ways and belle to tering data from farther out to the larger monopoles. }°ederal law changed to set specific timelines for processing these. small cell porotits_ There are also laws in place which stop eitics from prohibiting small cell deployment. State taw atiotiws t}he City to require a riuester use hermit, the City is using figuichisn lucent -cots as these master pertt7its. Cities are allowed site specific pwmil,s for the Remelt call installations in addition to the mita permits. The lelocpanrn iiidtisiry cannot interfere with the no_znal use of the riglds-of-way. Cities cannot regulate 4ervices based on eon lord or kind or sigreaits, c iiia not prohibit placement of wireless facilities within thu [ .iy. Since the City dam not ower any of tate lighting fixtures imp the right-of- way, the ca; I1 pray i d e rs linve ben signing agreements with catch of the; power providers to use their facilities. The City is expecting a small cell to be art antenna arm mare than three cubic feet in volume and the equipment box would be no larger than seventeen cubic fail. Mr. Iamb shared pietui es of what it was possible for the srnali cell deployment to look like. 'Ito City errn restrict the height, based 21111i-01-11 Manning Curnrui: :ori Miriule3 I'ags 4 if4 on 5.itnirlg location, impose sonic design standards which might incltidc stealth shrouding requirements and landscaping for some facilities. Mr. Lamb explc+itted Ills proposed amendments: • Appendix A, add definitions related specifically to saint cell deplclyrii n[s clad the Hew timeline provisions. w SVMC 17.11(1.030 add that sn14111 cull permits are a Type 1 permit and shall hes processed as such, except kis otherwise required by federal and state: law, • SVMC 19,6{}.050 emend the permitted use. matrix to allow small cell deployments in all macs subject to the supplemental mglilationA proposed in new chapters SVMC 2.2.12 t and 22.122 • SV MC 22.12(1 remove any references to small cell services sVMC 22,121 new Chapter pi widing fir master use pm -faits, deployment of small cell fiic:ilitic:s rind lays nut the permit application requirements and small cell tIcsigri and cnncealirent standards. • SVMC 22.122 new chapter providing for mandated permit review times. iiS suited in state or federal regulations.. Commissioner Jehtts4n n ked who would be responsible if ouc or the sites was danifaged. Mr. Lamb stated it would be Iulrndled jut as if it was a power pole eta. a mail box in I]sc right-of=wa . Commissioners asked if pruvidci, would be required to a lce:ato on the sumo prole- Mr. Lamb said providers would have to prove that the only plaice Clye:y can provide services is where they want 10 locate their. egnipnrertt. Commissioners raised concerns regarding: • the aesthetie:s of having more equipment in the rights -or -ways, * how close together acilities would need to be ionated, if they could not co -locate, • if they were wide band or narrow Mand facilities. • what would the frexlnc.troy do to honeybees, animtils and p4c}plr. thieves would dans€rgc: the sites for wiring. ▪ yid iatioo Full the signals being givers off these lowered antennas, • the ability to determine what they depluyriient will look like. Mr. Lamb slated the public hearing for the small cell deployment was scheduled for Janerary 25, 2018, Ho would do his hest to try and bring answers lly tile public. hearing. VBEL Goon of TIIE ORDER: Commissioners congratulated C umrnisyiuric:r Rasmussen on her appointor ent to the o:fice of Chair and wished her luck. TX. ADJOURNMENT Commissioner Johnson moved to adjourn 1.1ic meeting at 8:12 para. The vole on lbw migion was 1rraafintaus in favor, the trruliurJFar}.s.sed( Michelle Rasmussen, Chair Date signed Deanna Horton, Secretary COMMUNITY AND PUBLIC WORKS B1111.1]IN( & 11L,ANNING STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION '1'Cl'1' ;. PLANNING COMMISSION ('TA -4.017 003 STAFF REPORT DATE: I'ecember 7, 2017 HEAR1NG DATE AND LOCATION: December 14, 2017, beginning at 6:00 p.m., Spokane Valley City Rill Council Chambers, 10210 East Sprague Avenue, Spokane Valley, Washington 99206. T'ttoPoSALl)ESCRIPTION: A text amendment to Spuluatne Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) Chapter 20.20, General Provisions to address non -legal. 1o1s and innocent purchasers, ulimivaile inconsistencies with Title 19 resulting from the development regulations update in 2016, modify Ilio rlofnition of flag lot in Appendix A, eliminate requirements for lot and street arrangements and fame acquisition areas, clarifications and minor gra11matical changes. APPROvAIr Cur•a'LdlRIA: Spokane; Valley Comprehensive. Plan. SVMC Title 17 (general Provisions, and SVMC 1930.040 .30,040 I}eveloprrment regulation text amendments. SUMMARY OFBECOMNIEi*tI?A'1'IONa StaaITri oiritnc ds approval of CIA -2017-0003 to City Council STAFF PLANNER: Martin, Palaniuk, l'ltunncr, Coatununity and Public forks Dcpa'+ttment A'LTAC:HME> TS: Exhibit 1! Ptnposed text aarnendmcnt to SVMC 20.20 (general Provisiotia Exhibit 2: Proposed I4xt alaa7cnduuent to SVI MC Appendix A - Definitions A. TtAf:1CC RC3lJ N I) I N FOR11'L&TION 1. APPLICATION PROCESSING: S'VNIC Chapter 47.811, Permit 1'rv0ttssing Frncoduics_ fr Mowing. table summarizes the procedural steps for the proposal, Process Published NIA ice of Public Hearing: Sent Notice o Pub1k Hearing to staff/agencies; SF, PA - Pursuant to WAC 19711-R00(I 9)(a) this action is excentpt from SEPA review_ Department of Commerce 60 -day Notice of intent to Ado t Amens neat 1)n k '1 he November 21, 2017 Ducembur 1, 2017 November 29, 2017 WA Novo rT ba 14, 2017 PROPOSAL 13ACKGROUNTr: The Genera,' Provisions chaoplcr oi. the Subdivision Regulation corolains regulatory provisielm that ripply to tiny subdivision ot`property in the City of Spokane Valley. The regulations in this chapter are general in iaatuat, apply to all aspsc:(s 01' subdividing land, and arc not specific to uriy particular subdivision process or laud action_ Staff Report unci Rec[amirtcmdation CTA -2017-0003 entire SVIvie Ciiap1c-r 20,20 (General Provisions was revieweei. Many il'the proposed changes have been made to improve the readability o1 the chapter, standardize the wviy the municipal cede is referenced, mid to irctikc it consistent throughout the municipal code, The rctn€svxal of lot width unci depth requirements hi the Zoning regulations created inconsistencies with the sttladivisioir regulations. The issue of determining u legal lot has been problematic for staff when reviewing building peramtiit, _ The state legislation adopted ri putting act in 1937 that grave local jurisdictions the authority to review the division nt'land and to in9are compliance with local rcquireniints. Prisu'to I937 plats wens not reviewed by local jurisdictions, In 1969 the shite to ;isIature repealed the 1937 act acid adopted the plattingaotthnt is in cffcct today, The 1969 Platting Act is implemented at the s181c 1c' cI through the [Revised etnIC of Washington (1 W) 58.17 and at the local level through SVMC'litle 20. hr order far development lo oec:tit can land, it inust he divided in cnnrpiiarnc;e with stale platting i'teluhuii lits. 1.ocai subdivision regulations ikuV designed and itriptcrtrnotci1 to ensure compliance with slate requirements and cc. -m nunity staindards. The subdivi lion regulations provides the process for local jurisdictions to maike sure the iiew development of lots will comply with the standards for access, roadways, water and sewer service, lot arca, density, sate paths t* school, and other health, safety, and welfare concerns. A lot that is created outride ofthe legal subdivision process may not meet these standards, S1althas encountered seVerrYI occasions in which ai citizen has applied for a building permit to develop on a lot that was not legally cleated City staff reviews the site plan for a new building (o ‘16111'k2, aYittong other things, (he 1+ui1dtii wi t1 Dave adequate aicress, will be properly set hack t'rorn property lines, will riot he built within an established casement, aind is being built on a legal lot. In cases Where i IOC lois not Xoom legally established the In ildirr permit must be denied pursuant to the current regulations. in 50111B cases the properly rrw Tier. has purchased the lot without knowing the lot was not legally established. The proposed amendment clarifies whait is It legal rlivriNioir nf lane_ C'irrently, lots may be created through a deed if the were recorded prior to one of three key dates. 'ilii± dates correspond to the implcuzeniatintt times of various stale and vouuty platt[ing 1 islation- As currently written, it is nut deur what date should be applied when determining if a lot was legally created. The proposed language will establish the key date as the date Spokane County adopted their first sitbclivisioli ordinance. The proposed amendment will also allow protecrtion fur an innocent purchaser of a non -legal lot. If the ipurchaser did not have kaowlcdgc that a lot was not legally created them they will be permitted to develop un the lot. The amendment wil] also allow development on a non-logr►1 lot if the public interest is not adversely affected. The City of Spokane Valley compreltensive Flan was updated through a legislative update in 2016, A variety of chinl„cs tocettr d wittrin SV MC 'title 1 J. Zoning Regulations, as hurt of the update, Amon; the changes was the elimination of wlJHrd Ir lot width and lot depth. '['hese changes resulted to inconsistencies with SVi 4C Chapter 211-20 Cleneral Provisions. The eIimiiuition of he corner lot width a !ulrctrlcnts and the lotwidth to lot depth requirement will eliminate thie inconsistency with thii chapter. SVMC 20.26,090(il) provides a mechanism for Ilse City lir require lore and street arrangements and to establish future acquisition aro aiy.. Future acquisition areas encumber the property in that parking., draivaigc, improvements, and physical structures cannel. be tai:Gucci within 111e area Setbacks for building are established from the future tiC[1iiisi ion arca. These aroaN wtre meant 10 aneconirncxlaie future road irnprovernents that were anticipated as part of the airteriar[ mrd la,util access street plans. The City ieterinined that it was not legal to regtrire developnierrt to }"sot aside' areas for future developmme:nt based on pians that may or may not be implemented. 'Clues proposed a mendirient will eliminate language that is not consistent with this determination. The Plano Gnat Commission n conducted u study session on this arnendnient on November 9, 2017.. A public hearueg is schtml ilod fur Due 1 r[, 2017. Pige2 of Staff R.epaii mut Reel.)mnot:dation CIA -2017-0003 1;. jiINDINGS AND CONCLUSIOI S SP>S CIlr1C�. Ti) 'i'liL MUNICTPA[, CODE 'i'EX' APel N13ME11I' 1. Coiuplirrnce with Title 17 (Central Provisions) oFilre Spokane Volley Municipal C.odc E6. 'hiding', SV MC 17, M.150(F)1'vfi iii ipal Code "Text Amendment Approved Criteria f. The City may approve MuiiiciCode "Fox( rirnendm.ent, if it finds that (1) 'Ilse proposed text amendment is consistent wills the applicable. provisions of the Comprehensive Plan; Stair Analysis: Thu pro/rased amendment is supported by the Coinpre. nsiv4 Plt{rr and is consist Cid with the foI]owing goals and pc.heicw Land Use. Coal—1,1i-(i 1: Maintain and onhha tee the character and ci ialiivr of 1 ite in SpeiI attic Valley Land (Ise Cioal — LU -02: Provide for land uses that are essential to Spokane Valley residents, employees, and visitors. Land Ust: (]otil —1 .t1 -( Ensure that land ILISU plans, regulations, review processes, and irrtl^ristratcture improvements support economic grOW111 rind vital ity_ The change will simplify the process used to determine if development can occcir cm a lat. If a purchaser cliff riot have knowledge 'hall a lot was not legally cnrc:alccl they wit. still he able to develop tlru lot. Tlse changes. will eliminate inconsistencies with other monk:401 stile titles_ (2) The proposed amendment hears a substantial relation to public heaI1h. safely, wellnrv, and protection of the environment; Staff Analysis: The amendment bears substant: al relation to public health, safety, welfare and protectiem of the environment. The changes will correct inc rrtsiislarscres, protect innocentpureliascr. of ron-legal lets, and simplify and clarify the Mingling.. Cunclirsfnn(s): Tim proposed text amendment is consistent with the apprwal criteria contained in lite SVlvtC', 2. Finding and Cniaclusions Specific to Public Comments a. Findings: No public. cennnenls have been received to dale. b. C:unclusioi1 R): In thn absenue o!' publ is cnrnnients, staff makes no c ne1-tsions. 3. Finding and Conclusions Specific to Agcy Comments Findings: No agency coninments have been received to date. b, Cr nelirsioa(s): In the absence of agency comments, stafFniakes no Couclrisicirns, Palle: 3 taro Staff Report j |Re __kms m CTA -2017-{1003 C. OVERALL CONCLUSION. ']cproposed codetext amendment irii■e�nt with theCompreiwnic Plan policies and goals, e, m!'J± RECOMMEND AT1ON %SEmrcii s thnt rimming Commission recommend Eipproval or (t code text amendment to Cil Couni2i1 with Q]." c & - mg4oro CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: February 27, 2018 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ['consent ❑ old business ® new business ['public hearing ['information ❑admin. report ['pending legislation ['executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Second reading of proposed Ordinance No. 18-005 reauthorizing the joint Spokane Housing Authority. GOVERNING LEGISLATION: Chapter 35.82; Resolution 03-047. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Adoption of Resolution 03-047 authorizing creation of joint Spokane Housing Authority. Council heard an administrative report on February 6, 2018 and a first reading on February 20, 2018. BACKGROUND: The Spokane Housing Authority (the "Authority") is a joint housing authority established pursuant to chapter 35.82 RCW to provide affordable housing opportunities within the entire Spokane County region, including within the boundaries of the City of Spokane Valley (City). The Authority was initially created in in 1971 within the City of Spokane, and was expanded in 2001 to include the entire County. After incorporation, the City adopted Resolution 03-047 establishing the Authority as a joint housing authority within the City limits. The Authority has worked since establishment to provide safe, sanitary, and affordable housing opportunities to low -to -moderate income and senior citizens. It operates a number of affordable housing facilities and provides other types of assistance as well. The Authority operates independently from the City and no City funds or staff are used in Authority business. However, the City appoints two members to represent the City on the Authority commission. The City's current representatives are Gretchen Campbell and Keith James. Recently, the Authority determined that a number of the specific requirements set forth in the original authorizing documents, including Resolution 03-047, were burdensome and inflexible. These included specific designation of personnel, meeting times, and other operational requirements. These requirements make it difficult for the Authority to conduct its business in the most efficient manner. Accordingly, the Authority approached the City, Spokane County, and the City of Spokane to request that each re-establish the Authority and to allow more operational flexibility with things such as meeting times and specific personnel that are required to run the Authority. Staff from the Authority, the City, Spokane County, and the City of Spokane have worked to draft an appropriate Ordinance for each jurisdiction to adopt to re-establish the Authority with the flexibility it desires. The proposed Ordinance maintains the same mission and goals for the Authority and the Authority will continue to provide the same type and level of service and opportunities that it has provided historically. Staff from the Authority have included a more detailed memo regarding the proposed changes. During the administrative report, staff from the Authority provided an update on the proposed Ordinance as well as Authority operations. Page 1 of 2 OPTIONS: Move to approve the proposed Ordinance No. 18-005, with or without further amendments. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to approve Ordinance No. 18-005 reauthorizing the joint Spokane Housing Authority. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: N/A. STAFF CONTACT: Erik Lamb, Deputy City Attorney. ATTACHMENTS: (1) Memo from SHA; (2) Proposed Ordinance No. 18-005; (3) Resolution 03- 047. Page 2 of 2 Spokane Housing Authority MEMORANDUM DATE: January 29, 2018 TO: Erik Lamb, Deputy City Attorney City of Spokane Valley FROM: Pam Tietz, Executive Director SUBJECT: Spokane Housing Authority Joint Ordinance Background The Spokane Housing Authority was originally established in accordance with RCW 35.82 on June 13, 1982 by a City of Spokane Resolution 255-1. For a Housing Authority to exist and operate, the RCW requires a declaration of need by local jurisdictions. SHA was later expanded as a Joint Housing Authority in accordance with RCW 35.82.300. This was first to include unincorporated areas of Spokane County and then adding the City of Spokane Valley in 2003. The City of Spokane Valley, City of Spokane and Spokane County then adopted one additional resolution to approve the expansion of the board from five (5) members to six (6) members to allow for one new board member, who must be a participant of SHA services or "Directly Assisted Commissioner" and to establish that the City of Spokane Valley had the authority appoint two of the six Commissioners (one slot ceded from Spokane County). The original resolutions adopted by each jurisdiction included provisions that ideally would be in agency bylaws or that periodically change. An example of this would be when regular meetings will be held, the order of business on the agenda, what will be on a consent agenda, and who the existing board is. This can create issues from an operating perspective and some confusion as the board changes. In addition, Spokane County has long held that they should have equal representation on SHA's board and that there was some confusion when one of their two slots was ceded when the updated resolution added a Directly Assisted Commissioner. The addition of this Commissioner also took SHA's Board to an even number when ideally we should have an odd number of Commissioners in the case of a tie. Proposal SHA has proposed a new Joint Ordinance for each of the three jurisdiction's consideration. The changes are not substantial; however would simplify things from an operating standpoint; give Spokane County an additional Commissioner position on SHA's Board; and make the total number of board members 7 (an odd number). The proposed ordinance has been vetted by each local jurisdictions legal counsel and the proposed ordinance has been agreed to in principal. It is my recommendation that the updated Joint Ordinance be adopted. END OF MEMORANDUM 1 DRAFT CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 18-005 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON, CONFIRMING THE FORMATION OF THE SPOKANE HOUSING AUTHORITY AS A JOINT HOUSING AUTHORITY; PROVIDING FOR MATTERS REQUIRED PURSUANT TO RCW 35.82.300; REPEALING CERTAIN RESOLUTIONS; AND OTHER MATTERS RELATING THERETO. WHEREAS, the Washington Legislature, by enactment of Chapter 23, Section 4, of the Laws of 1939, as amended (currently codified as RCW 35.82.030), created in each city and in each county of the State a public body corporate and politic a housing authority of such city or county, as applicable. Such statute further provides that no such authority shall transact any business or exercise its powers under chapter 35.82 RCW until or unless the governing body of the city or the county, as the case may be, declares by resolution that there is need for an authority to function in such city or county. Pursuant to a resolution adopted by its City Council on December 13, 1971, the City of Spokane (Spokane) declared a need for a housing authority to function within Spokane, and named such housing authority as the "Housing Authority of the City of Spokane;" and WHEREAS, there are unsanitary and unsafe inhabited dwellings located in the incorporated cities and towns within Spokane County (County), and in the unincorporated area of the County, as well as a shortage of safe and sanitary dwelling accommodations available at rents affordable to persons of low to moderate income and to senior citizens. These conditions constitute a threat to the health, safety and welfare of the residents of the County. It appears likely that substandard housing conditions cannot entirely be relieved by the private sector; and WHEREAS, RCW 35.82.300 authorizes cities and counties to form joint housing authorities. To do so, the legislative authorities of one or more counties and the legislative authorities of any city or cities within any of those counties or in another county or counties must authorize the joint housing authority by ordinance, which ordinance is required to prescribe: (1) the number of commissioners of the joint housing authority, (2) the method for their appointment, (3) the length of their terms, (4) the method for their removal; (5) the election of officers of the joint housing authority; (6) the allocation of all costs of the joint housing authority; and (7) any other matters necessary for the operation of the joint housing authority; and WHEREAS RCW 35.82.300(4) provides that a "joint housing authority shall have all the powers as prescribed by [chapter 35.82 RCW] for any housing authority" and that "[t]he area of operation of a joint housing authority shall be the combined areas, defined by RCW 35.82.020(6), of the housing authorities created in each city and county authorizing the joint housing authority;" and WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 01-83, adopted by the Spokane City Council on September 24, 2001, and Resolution No. 1-0752, adopted by the Board of County Commissioners on August 14, 2001, Spokane and the County authorized the formation of the "Spokane Housing Authority" (Authority) as a joint housing authority within the boundaries of Spokane and the unincorporated portions of the County. Pursuant to Resolution No. 03-047, adopted by the Spokane Valley City Council on September 23, 2003, the City of Spokane Valley (City) authorized the formation of the Authority as a joint housing authority within the boundaries of the City. The Board of County Commissioners and the Spokane City Council have further adopted resolutions delegating to the Spokane Valley Mayor the authority to appoint two of the Authority's commissioners, and increasing the number of Authority commissioners from five to six; and WHEREAS, the Spokane City Council, City of Spokane Valley City Council, and Board of County Commissioners have determined there remains a continuing need for a housing authority within the Ordinance 18-005 SHA Page 1 of 5 DRAFT Spokane region. There exists a need to update the ordinances and resolutions authorizing the formation of the Authority to provide for the efficient governance of the Authority and to allow expansion of the Authority to areas not currently served by the Authority; and WHEREAS, the City Council hereby declares there remains a continuing need for a housing authority to function in the City, and hereby reaffirms each and every previous declaration of such need by the City Council. The City Council hereby determines it is necessary and desirable to adopt an updated ordinance to provide for the efficient governance of the Authority and to allow expansion to areas outside of the City, Spokane, and unincorporated areas of the County. NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley, Spokane County, Washington, ordains as follows: Section 1. Finding of Necessity. Upon review of the information before it and in consideration of material provided to it, the City Council of the City makes the following determinations: A. The City Council hereby adopts the recitals set forth in this Ordinance; B. Access to safe, secure, and affordable housing is important to the residents of the City, Spokane, and the County, collectively "the Community;" C. Access to this type of housing is increasingly difficult to many residents of the Community; and D. The Spokane Housing Authority (the "Authority"), with support from the Community, has successfully undertaken many initiatives to provide more housing opportunities, but there is still an unmet need that can best be addressed by the collective approach of the Community. Section 2. Authorization of Authority. A joint housing authority (within the meaning of RCW 35.82.300), to be known as "Spokane Housing Authority," is authorized by the City Council to be formed within the boundaries of the City. Section 3. Commissioners. The powers of the Authority are hereby vested in the Authority's commissioners in office from time to time. The commissioners in office from time to time shall be referred to as the Authority's "Board of Commissioners" (the Board). A. Number. The number of commissioners of the Authority shall be seven. Upon formation, one of the Authority's commissioners shall be designated as the "Assisted Commissioner", two of the Authority's commissioners shall be designated as the "Spokane Commissioners", two of the Authority's commissioners shall be designated as the "Spokane Valley Commissioners," and two of the Authority's commissioners shall be designated as the "County Commissioners." B. Method for Appointment. The Authority's commissioners shall be appointed and re -appointed in the following manner 1. Assisted Commissioner. The Assisted Commissioner shall be an individual who is directly assisted by the Authority (e.g. a resident of a housing project owned by the Authority, a recipient of Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher administered by the Authority) at the time such individual is appointed as the Assisted Commissioner. The Assisted Commissioner shall be appointed by the Authority's Board. Such appointment shall be evidenced by a resolution of the Board, which resolution shall be retained by the Authority's Executive Director (as defined herein). Such resolution shall be conclusive evidence of the due and proper appointment of the Assisted Commissioner. 2. Spokane Commissioners. Each Spokane Commissioner shall be an individual who, at the time such individual is appointed or re -appointed as a Spokane Commissioner, is a resident of Spokane Each Spokane Commissioner shall be appointed by the Mayor of Spokane and confirmed by the Spokane City Council. Such appointment shall be evidenced in writing by the Mayor and Ordinance 18-005 SHA Page 2 of 5 DRAFT the Spokane City Council (or by the Spokane City Clerk reflecting action by the Spokane City Council), and transmitted to the Authority's Executive Director. Such writing(s) shall be conclusive evidence of the due and proper appointment of the Spokane Commissioner to which the writing pertains. 3. Spokane Valley Commissioners. Each Spokane Valley Commissioner shall be an individual who, at the time such individual is appointed or re -appointed as a Spokane Valley Commissioner, is a resident of Spokane Valley. Each Spokane Valley Commissioner shall be appointed by the Mayor of Spokane Valley and confirmed by the Spokane Valley City Council. Such appointment shall be evidenced in writing by the Mayor and the Spokane Valley City Council (or by the Spokane Valley City Clerk reflecting action by the Spokane Valley City Council) and transmitted to the Authority's Executive Director. Such writing(s) shall be conclusive evidence of the due and proper appointment of the Spokane Valley Commissioner to which the writing pertains. 4. County Commissioner. Each Spokane County Commissioner shall be an individual who, at the time such individual is appointed or re -appointed as the County Commissioner, is a resident of Spokane County (regardless of whether such individual resides in an incorporated city or town or in the unincorporated area of the County; however, they may not reside inside the City of Spokane or the City of Spokane Valley city limits). The County Commissioners shall be appointed by the Board of County Commissioners. Such appointment shall be evidenced in writing by the Board of County Commissioners (or by the Clerk of the Board of County Commissioners reflecting action by the Board of County Commissioners) and transmitted to the Authority's Executive Director. Such writing shall be conclusive evidence of the due and proper appointment of the County Commissioner. C. Length of Terms. Each commissioner shall be appointed (or re -appointed) for a term of office of five years from the date such commissioner is appointed (or re -appointed, if applicable). At the end of a commissioner's term of office, the commissioner shall hold office until his or her successor has been appointed, unless sooner removed according to this Ordinance. Notwithstanding the foregoing, a person appointed as the Assisted Commissioner may serve in that position only as long as he or she is directly assisted by the Authority. D. Method of Removal. 1. The Assisted Commissioner may be removed for neglect of duty, or misconduct in office. Any such removal shall be evidenced in a resolution of the Board. The Assisted Commissioner shall be removed only after he or she shall have been given a copy of the charges by the Board Chair. Removal of the Assisted Commissioner requires a majority vote of the Board. 2. The Mayor of Spokane, with confirmation by the Spokane City Council, may remove a Spokane Commissioner for neglect of duty or misconduct in office. A Spokane Commissioner shall be removed only after he or she shall have been given a copy of the charges by (or on behalf of) the Mayor of Spokane 3. The Mayor of Spokane Valley, with confirmation by the City of Spokane Valley Council may remove a Spokane Valley Commissioner for neglect of duty, or misconduct in office. A Spokane Valley Commissioner shall be removed only after he or she shall have been given a copy of the charges by (or on behalf of) the Mayor of Spokane Valley. 4. The Board of County Commissioners may remove the County Commissioner for neglect of duty or misconduct in office. The County Commissioner shall be removed only after he or she shall have been given a copy of the charges by (or on behalf of) the chairperson. Ordinance 18-005 SHA Page 3 of 5 DRAFT E. Vacancies. A mid-term vacancy resulting from the death, resignation or removal of a commissioner shall be filled by the appointment of a replacement commissioner. The replacement commissioner shall be appointed in the manner set forth in Section 3(B). The replacement commissioner shall serve for the remaining stated term of the replaced commissioner; however, if the remaining term of the replaced commissioner is less than one year at the time the replacement commissioner is appointed, the replacement commissioner shall serve for a full five-year term (measured pursuant to Section 3(C) of this ordinance). F. Quorum. Four commissioners shall constitute a quorum of the Board for the purpose of conducting its business and exercising its powers and for all other purposes Action may be taken by the Board upon a vote of a majority of the commissioners present at the time such action is taken, unless in any case the bylaws of the Authority shall require a larger number. G. Officers of the Board. The Board shall select from among its commissioners a Chair and a Vice Chair of the Authority, each of whom shall serve in such capacity until the Board appoints a successor. H. Compensation. A commissioner shall receive no compensation for his or her services for the Authority, in any capacity, but he or she shall be entitled to the necessary expenses, including traveling expenses, incurred in the discharge of his or her duties as a commissioner. I. Existing Commissioners. The commissioners in office on the effective date of this Ordinance shall continue to serve the respective terms, subject to removal pursuant to Section 3(D) of this Ordinance. Section 4. Bylaws. The Board may adopt, and from time to time, may amend or restate, bylaws and other rules of operation for the Authority. Bylaws of the Authority shall include provisions for annual, regular and special meetings of the Board. The Bylaws shall be consistent with this Ordinance and chapter 35.82 RCW. Section 5. Officers, Agents and Employees. The Authority may employ an Executive Director of the Authority. If an Executive Director is employed, that individual also shall be Secretary of the Authority. The Authority also may employ technical experts and such other officers, agents and employees, permanent and temporary, as it may require, and shall determine their qualifications, duties and compensation. For such legal services as it may require, the Authority may employ its own counsel and legal staff. The Authority, acting through the Board, may delegate to one or more of its agents or employees such powers or duties as it may deem proper. Section 6. Allocation of Costs of the Authority. A. The Authority is and shall be solely responsible for all debts and operating expenses incurred in the operation of the Authority. No costs of the Authority shall be allocated to Spokane, Spokane Valley or the County. The obligations of the Authority shall not be a debt of Spokane, Spokane Valley, the County, the State of Washington or any political subdivision of the State of Washington (other than the Authority). Subject to Section 6(B) of this Ordinance, neither Spokane, Spokane Valley, the County, the State of Washington nor any political subdivision of the State of Washington (other than the Authority), shall be liable for the obligations of the Authority, nor in any event shall obligations of the Authority be payable out of any funds or properties other than those of the Authority. B. Nothing in Section 6(A) of this Ordinance shall prevent Spokane, Spokane Valley, the County, the State of Washington or a political subdivision of the State of Washington from providing assistance to the Authority, financial or otherwise, under the Housing Cooperation Law (chapter 35.83 RCW) or any other applicable law, or prevent the Authority from using any such assistance to pay obligations of the Authority. Ordinance 18-005 SHA Page 4 of 5 DRAFT Section 7. Assumption of Responsibilities. The Authority assumes all of the contractual and financial liabilities for the Housing Authority of the City of Spokane, as such liabilities existed on the date the Authority became a joint housing authority under RCW 35.82.300. Section 8. Deactivation of the Authority. Upon deactivation of the Authority as provided by law, the assets of the Authority shall be applied and distributed pursuant to RCW 35.82.325. However, if the Housing Authority of the City of Spokane is reactivated at the time the Authority is deactivated, it shall be entitled to the return of all assets held by it prior to the organization of the Authority, and the Housing Authority of the City of Spokane shall assume all debts encumbering and/or associated with said assets. Section 9. Repeal of Certain Prior Acts. The City intends for this Ordinance to replace all prior authorizing actions and hereby repeals all prior official acts related to authorizing the Authority that are contrary to this Ordinance, including Resolution No. 03-047, and those actions shall have no further force and effect other than to evidence that the Authority was duly organized as a joint housing authority pursuant to RCW 35.82.300, and has operated as a joint housing authority at all times since September 24, 2001. Such repeal shall not be effective until the date this Ordinance and the other substantive provisions become effective. Section 10. Ratification of Past Acts. All acts heretofore taken by Spokane, Spokane Valley and the County to organize the Authority as a joint housing authority under RCW 35.82.300 are hereby ratified, confirmed and approved. Section 11. Severability. If any part of this Ordinance is declared unenforceable, invalid, or unconstitutional, such unenforceability, invalidity, or unconstitutionality shall not affect the enforceability, validity, or constitutionality of the remainder. Section 12. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect on the latest of (A) the date an ordinance substantially similar to this Ordinance takes effect as to Spokane under Article III, Section 19.B, of the Spokane City Charter; (B) the date an ordinance substantially similar to this Ordinance is enacted by the County, or (C) five days after the date of publication of this Ordinance or a summary thereof in the official newspaper of the City as provided by law. Passed by the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley this 27 day of February, 2018. City of Spokane Valley ATTEST: L.R. Higgins, Mayor Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Approved as to Form: Office of the City Attorney Date of Publication: Effective Date: Ordinance 18-005 SHA Page 5 of 5 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. 03-047 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE. COUNTY, WASHINGTON, PROVIDING FOR APPOINTMENT, MEMBERS OF THF.. BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS AND OPERATIONAL RULES FOR THE SPOKANE HOUSING AUTHORITY; AND PROVIDING FOR OTHER MATTERS PROPERLY RELATING THERETO . JOINT C1TY/COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Spokane County, Washington BE FF RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, of Spokane County, Washington: WHEREAS, the City of Spokane Valley, Washington ("CITY"), is a noncharter code city duly organized and existing under and by virtue of the Constitution and the laws of the State of Washington; and WHEREAS, the Council of the CITY ("COUNCIL") recognizes the public interest in sustaining affordable housing for the residents of the city and the surrounding community; and WHEREAS, by Resolution dated May 13, 2003, COUNCIL recognized the need for tow -income housing; and WHEREAS, the Spokane Housing Authority ("AUTHORITY") has provided services within the city limits of the city of Spokane Valley; and WHEREAS, recognition of such geographical service area was recognized by Resolution of both the City of Spokane and Spokane County deferring appointment to CITY, one member of the Board of Commissioners of the AUTHORITY ("BOAR.D") who works or resides within the city of Spokane Valley; and WHEREAS, every housing authority in the State of Washington is authorized to do any and all things necessary or desirable to secure the financial aid or cooperation of the federal government in the undertaking, construction, maintenance or operation of any housing project by such authority pursuant to RC\V 35.82.800; and WHEREAS, AUTHORITY has in the past and will in the future, secure the financial aid and cooperation of the federal government and is solely responsible for all debts and operating expenses incurred in the operation of AUTHORI'T'Y. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY FOUND DETERMINED AND ORDERED as follows: Section I: FINDING OF NECESSITY Upon review of the information before it and after consideration of material provided to it, COUNCIL makes the following determinations: Rcsolunion 03-047 Page 1 of 6 (a) The affordability of adequate housing for a number of residents within the boundaries of the city of Spokane Valley is an increasing problem; (b) AUTHORITY has entered into a number of agreements with other municipalities within Spokane County to assist. with this problem and has had success providing more housing opportunities for low income individuals, but the problem of adequate housing for low income residents of this community still remains; Section 2: AUTHORiTY (a) Name of Authority. The name of the Authority shall be and remain "Spokane Housing Authority." (b) Seal of the Authority. The seal of the Authority shall be in the form of a circle and shall bear the name of the Authority and the year of its organization as a joint city/county housing authority. (c) Office of Authority. The office of the Authority shall be at such place in the County of Spokane, Washington, as the Authority may from time to time designate by Resolution. The official office of the Authority is presently located at 55 W. Mission, Spokane, Washington. Section 3: APPOINTiVIENT AND TENURE OF COMMISSION A board of five (5) Commissioners (BOARD) composed of the following shall govern AU`i'HORI'I'Y: (a) Membership of the BOARD. One (1) individual who is directly assisted by AUTHORITY, jointly appointed by the Mayor of the City of Spokane, the Mayor of the City of Spokane Valley, and the Chair of the Board of County Commissioners; Two (2) individuals who work or reside within the city limits of the city of Spokane appointed by the Mayor and confirmed by the Council of the City of Spokane; One (1) individual who works or resides in unincorporated Spokane County, Washington, appointed by the Board of Commissioners of Spokane. County; Washington; One (1) individual who works or resides within the city limits of the city of Spokane Valley, appointed by the Mayor and confirmed by COUNCIL of CiTY of Spokane Valley; (b) Existing BOARD. The term of each appointment shall be for five (5) years on a rotating basis in concurrence with provisions under RCW 35.82.040. With the establishment of the joint city/county housing authority, the following Commissioners and terns shall be certified as follows: Julia Rahman — SHA -assisted Representative 3/15/2006 William Zeck —City of Spokane Representative 3/15/2004 Terri Symbol — County of Spokane Representative 3/15/2002 Resolution 03-047 Page 2 of 6 Richard Brittain — City of Spokane Representative 3/15/2005 Janet Bastine — City of Spokane Valley Representative 3/15/2008 Any seat vacated prior to the expiration of the term shall be filled by the appropriate jurisdiction and shall be for the unexpired term of that Commissioner's seat. (c) Removal of Commissioner. For inefficiency or neglect of duty or misconduct in office, a Commissioner may be removed by the Mayor (if a City appointee); the Chair of the Board of County Commissioners (if a County appointee); and the Mayor of Spokane and Chair jointly as SHA -assisted representative appointee. A Commissioner may be removed only after having been given a copy of the charges at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing thereon and after having an opportunity to be heard in person or by Council. In the event of the removal of any Commissioner, a record of the proceedings, together with the charges and findings thereon, shall be filed in the Office of the Secretary. Section 4: OFFICERS (a) Officers. The officers of AUTHORITY shall be a Chair, a Vice -Chair and a Secretary who shall be the Executive Director. (b) Chair. The Chair shall preside at all meetings of the BOARD. Except as otherwise authorized by Resolution of the BOARD, the Chair shall sign all contacts, deed, and other instruments made by AUTHORITY. At each meeting, the Chair shall submit such recommendations and information as the Chair considers proper concerning the business, affairs and policies of AUTHORITY. (c) Vice -Chair. The Vice -Chair shall perform the duties of the Chair in the absence or incapacity of the Chair. In case of the resignation or death of the Chair, the Vice -Chair shall perform the duties as are imposed on the Chair until such times as BOARD shall elect a new Chair. (d) Secretary. The Secretary shall be the Executive Director of AUTHORITY and as such, shall have general supervision over the administration of its business and affairs, subject to the direction of AUTHORITY. The Executive Director shall be charged with the management of the housing projects of AUTHORITY. The Secretary shall keep the records of BOARD, shall act as secretary of the meetings of BOARD and record all votes, and shall keep a record of the proceedings of' BOARD in a journal of proceedings to be kept for such purposes, and shall perform all duties incident to the office. The Secretary shall keep in safe custody, the seal of AUTHORITY and shall have the power to affix such seal to all contracts and instruments authorized to be executed by AUTHORITY. The Secretary shall have the care and custody of all funds of AUTHORITY, and shall deposit the same in the name of AUTHORITY in such bank or banks as AUTHORITY may select. The Secretary shall sign all orders and checks for the payment of money and shall pay out and disburse such moneys under the direction of AUTHORITY. Except as otherwise authorized by Resolution of BOARD, all such orders and cheeks shall be countersigned by the Chair. The Secretary shall keep regular books of accounts showing receipts and expenditures and shall render to BOARD, at each regular meeting (or more often if requested), an account of all AUTHORITY transactions and the financial condition of AUTHORITY. The Secretary shall give such bond for the faithful performance of these duties as BOARD may determine. Resolution 03.047 ['age 3 of 6 The compensation of the Secretary shall be determined by BOARD, provided that a temporary appointee selected from among the Commissioners of AUTHORITY shall serve without compensation (other than the payment of necessary expenses). (e) Other Duties. The officers of AUTHORITY shall perform such other duties and functions as may from time to time be required by BOARD or the by-laws or rules and regulations of AUTHORITY. (t) Election of Appointment. The Chair and Vice -Chair shall be elected at the annual meeting of AUTHORITY from among the Commissioners of AU'T'HORITY, and shall hold office for one (1) year or until their successors are elected and qualified. The Secretary shall be appointed by AUTHORITY. Any person appointed to fill the office of Secretary, or any vacancy therein, shall have such term as AUTHORITY Fixed, but no Commissioner of AUTHORITY shall be eligible for this office except as a temporary appointee. (g) Vacancies. Should the office of Chair or vice -Chair become vacant, AUTHORITY shall elect a successor from its membership at the next regular meeting, and such election shall be for the unexpired term of said office. When the office of the Secretary becomes vacant, AUTHORITY shall appoint a successor as aforesaid. Section 5: MEETINGS (a) Annual Meeting. The annual meeting of AUTHORITY shall be held on the third Monday of October at 3:30 p.m. at the regular meeting place of AUTHORITY. (b) Regular Meetings. Regular meetings shall be held without notice at such time and place as may from time to time be determined and given public, legal notice. (c) Special lviectings. The Chair of the BOARD may, when deemed expedient, and shall, upon the written request of two (2) Commissioners of AUTHORITY, call a special meeting of the BOARD for the purpose of transacting any business designated in the call. The call for a special meeting may be delivered to each Commissioner of AUTHORITY to either the home or business address at least two (2) days prior to the date of the special meeting. At such special meeting, no business shall be considered other than as designated in the call, but if all of the Commissioners of AUTHORITY are present at a special meeting, any and all business may be transacted at such special meeting. (d) Quorum. The powers of AUTHORITY shall be vested in the Commissioners thereof in office from time to time. Three (3) Commissioners shall constitute a quorum for the purpose of conducting its business and exercising its powers and for all other purposes, but a smaller number may adjourn from time to time until a quorum is obtained. When a quorum is in attendance, action may be taken by AUTHORITY upon vote of the majority of the Commissioners present. (e) Order of Business. At the regular meeting of AUTHORITY, the following shall be the order of business: 1. Convening of Meeting Action on proposed Resolutions and Motions Resolution 03-047 Page 4 of 6 3. Consent Calendar Approval of minutes of previous meeting Review of month-end Financial Reports Department reports Resident Group reports News & Notes 4. New Business 5. Unfinished Business 6. Adjournment All Resolutions shall be in writing and shall be copied in a journal of the proceedings of BOARD. (f) Manner of Voting. The voting on all questions coming before AUTHORITY shall be by voice vote, and the Ayes and Noes shall be entered upon the minutes of such meeting, except on the election of officers which may be by ballot. (g) Sub -Committees. Sub -committees may be established by the Chair as a standing or ad- hoc committee. Sub -committees shall consist of two (2) Commissioners. At the request of the sub- committe, AUTHORITY personnel may be assigned by the Secretary. Section 6: AUTHORITY FOR OPERATION (a) Statutory. AUTHORITY shall have the legal authority and the complete obligations as set forth in the laws and Constitution of the State of Washington. Nothing set forth herein is intended in any way to limit this authority or AUTHORITY'S ability to operate. (b) Assumption of Responsibilities. AUTHORITY assumes all of the contractual and financial liabilities for the Spokane Housing Authority. (c) Professional Services. BOARD of AUTHORITY shall have the authority, from time to time, to appoint the necessary professionals to assist it, including but not limited to legal counsel, underwriting and financial services and other professional assistance deemed necessary. (d) Bylaws.. BOARD may adopt, and from time to time amend, bylaws and other rules of operation. (e) Financial Responsibility. AUTHORITY shall be responsible for its own financial and other obligations. Absent specific action by COUNCIL, CITY shall have no financial or other responsibility for the operation of AUTHORITY. Section 7: GENERAL, AUTHORIZATION The Mayor, Chief Administrative Officer and the City Attorney, as agents and representatives of CITY are hereby authorized and directed to do everything necessary to accomplish the acts set forth in this Resolution. Rexduiiun 03-047 Page 5 of 6 Section 8: RATIFICATION OF PAST ACTS All acts as heretofore taken by CITY officers, staff, attorneys and agents consistent with the terms and purposes of this Resolution are hereby ratified, confirmed and approved. Section 9: SEVERABILITY If any one or more of the covenants or agreements provided in this Resolution to be performed on the part of CI'T'Y shall be declared by any court of competent jurisdiction to be contrary to law, then such covenant or covenants, agreement or agreements, shall be null and void and shall be deemed separable from the remaining covenants and agreements of this Resolution and shall in no way affect the validity of the other provisions of this Resolution. Section 10: REPEALER All Resolutions or parts thereof in conflict herewith are, to the extent of such conflict, hereby repealed, and shall have no further force or affect. AT - Section 1 I: EFFECTIVE DATE This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. ADOPTED this 23`I day of September, 2003. ristine Bainbridge, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: War 'tat ey Sch Iv Interim City Attorney Resolution 03-U47 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Michael DeVleminayor Paec 6 of 6 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: February 27, 2018 Check all that apply: ['consent ❑ old business ❑ information ❑ admin. report Department Director Approval: ® new business ['public hearing ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Motion Consideration: Appleway Trail GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 35.77.010, Perpetual Advanced Six -Year plans for coordinated transportation program expenditures. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: • 6/28/2016: Council passed Resolution 16-009, adopting the 2017-2022 Six Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP), which included this project. • 5/23/2017: Council passed Resolution 17-011, adopting the 2018-2023 Six Year TIP, which included this project. • 2/23/2018: Council Workshop discussion regarding Appleway Trail. BACKGROUND: When fully constructed, the Appleway Trail will provide a five mile urban trail that will extend from the eastern City boundaries to City Hall. The segments from the City boundaries to Corbin, University to Pines, and Pines and Evergreen have been completed. Construction for the segment from Sullivan to Corbin will begin in March 2018. There are two remaining planned segments, Sullivan to Evergreen and University to Balfour Park, to complete the planned five -mile trail. The Evergreen to Sullivan segment is currently planned to be in designed in 2018 and constructed in 2020. The University to Balfour Park segment is currently planned to be designed in 2018 and constructed in 2019. Grants have been secured to partially fund these segments and the grant applications state that both projects will include a 12 -foot wide multi- use asphalt path, irrigation, plantings, lightings, crossings, and HAWK signals at the Evergreen, Sullivan and Sprague crossings. Total estimated costs and funding for each segment is summarized in the table below: As shown in the table above, both projects are underfunded. Staff has explored several options which will be discussed with Council. Evergreen - Sullivan University - Balfour Totals Total Estimated Project Cost (As currently Scoped) $2,343,000 $1,650,000 $3,992,500 City Funds $222,075 $101,250 CMAQ $1,422,925 $449,800 TAP $198,950 Total Secured Funding $1,645,000 $750,000 $2,395,000 Total Funding Gap $698,000 $900,000 $1,597,000 As shown in the table above, both projects are underfunded. Staff has explored several options which will be discussed with Council. Option #1: Continue with the concept of completing both projects as initially designed and pursue additional grant opportunities to minimize the funding gap. The current need is approximately $1.6 Million. Option #2: Continue with the Evergreen to Sullivan project as initially designed. For the University to Balfour project however, because the timing of locating a library at Balfour Park is currently unknown and consequently Balfour Park remains undeveloped, terminate the trail at City Hall. The project cost for this segment would be reduced from $1,650,000 to $1,255,000 representing a savings of $395,000 from current scope. Option 2 will require the City to pursue additional grant opportunities to close the funding gap for both projects of $1.2 Million. Option #3: Continue with the Evergreen to Sullivan project as initially designed. For the University to Balfour Park however, due to the same rationale described in Option 2, terminate the trail at the intersection of Dartmouth and Appleway. This option would allow the City to consider trail extension alternatives in the future. The project cost for this segment would be reduced from $1,650,000 to $860,000 representing a savings of $790,000. Option 3 will require the City to pursue additional grant opportunities to close the funding gap for both projects of $800,000. Option #4: As suggested by the Spokane Regional Transportation Council (SRTC), repackage the two projects to completely fund the design and construction of the Evergreen to Sullivan segment as initially conceived, and forgo the University to Balfour Park project. By combining the funds from both projects, there will be $2.4 Million available which can fully fund the Evergreen to Sullivan segment. This option will allow the City to evaluate the trail extension west of University through a Comprehensive Plan Amendment in 2019. This option will require pursuing additional grant opportunities to fund the trail west of University which could range from $860,000 to $1,650,000, depending on the location of the western termini of the Appleway Trail. Options 1 through 3, require the City to pursue and secure additional grant funds. Depending on the grant funding cycle, these projects may not meet the funding obligation for construction required by the currently awarded grants. Additionally, the City will have to come up with additional funds to provide the required grant match which varies depending on the grant source. All options will require an amendment to the State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) which also requires a recommendation from SRTC's Technical Committee and Board approval. OPTIONS: Options 1 through 4 as stated above. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to authorize the City Manager to pursue Option 4. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Various impacts depending on selected alternative. STAFF CONTACT: Gloria Mantz, PE, Engineering Manager Mike Basinger, Economic Development Manager Mike Stone, Parks & Recreation Director ATTACHMENTS: Power Point Presentation; Appleway Trail Flyer Appleway Trail Mike Basinger, Economic Development Manager Gloria Mantz, Engineering Manager Mike Stone, Parks & Recreation Director SPOKANE VALLEY - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Project Background The Milwaukee Railroad right-of-way -abandoned and undeveloped ■ City's first Comprehensive Plan adopted in 2006 ■ Bike and Pedestrian Master Plan 2010 ■ Parks and Recreation MasterPlan 2013 ■ A collaborative agreement with Spokane County ■ Themed urban trail and linear park SPOKANE VALLEY - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Project Description ■ Shared use path spanning 5.2 miles ■ Recreational and economic asset ■ Attracts visitors ■ Opportunities to improve health ■ Connects people with businesses ■ Provides diverse experiences for users ■ Variety of amenities such as ■ Benches ■ Restrooms LA SPOKANE VALLEY - ECONONMC DEVELOPMENT Current Timeline f I E Gro ?• hap Ave F 'e, E &codivey Ave + * °. 3. Pines to Eve peen 2. lOniversity o Pines '� Completed 201 Completed 205 h A' W I s ° • -A. I 5 Z .1 r — r _�. IK: — .•E-5prelgUe Ave i- . ilit i ,. =4 . E 9th Ave E A 4h Ave' E I r Ave University to Balfour Park Design/ROW 2018 Construction 2019 IE,9rua]waY Ave 6. Corbin to City Limit Complet&d 2008 \I, Evergreen to Sullivan Design 2018 Construction 2020 LA SPOKANE VALLEY - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT University to Balfour Park • Project Scope: • Trail construction from University to Balfour Park • Landscaping and Irrigation • Crossing Sprague Avenue including HAWK Signal • Programmed Schedule • Design/ROW 2018 • Construction 2019 • Total Estimated Cost: $1,650,000 • Total Secured Funding: $750,000 • TAP: $199,000 • CMAQ: $450,000 • City Match: $101,000 • Evergreen to Sullivan • Project Scope: • Trail construction from University to Balfour Park • Landscaping and Irrigation • Two Crossings at Evergreen and Sullivan including HAWK Signals • Programmed Schedule • Design/R0W 2018 • Construction 2020 • Total Estimated Cost: $2,343,000 • Total Secured Funding: $1,645,000 • CMAQ: $1,423,000 • City Match: $222,000 • Funding Gap: $698,000 mpir. SPOKANE - :►, .A VALLEY ECONOM/C DEVELOPMENT Option #1 ■ Both Project Limits Remain the Same ■ Pursue Additional Grant Opportunities to Close Funding Gap ■ $900,000 for University/Balfour Park Segment ■ $698,000 for Evergreen to Sullivan Segment ■ Total Additional Funds Needed - $1.7 Million ■ Current Schedule for Upcoming Grant Opportunities May Not Allow Enough Time to Meet Current Project Obligation Deadlines ■ Amend State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) SPOKANE VALLEY - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ■ Continue with Evergreen to Sullivan project as Initially Scoped ■ Revise project limits of the University to Balfour section to terminate at City Hall ■ Extending the trail to Balfour Park may be premature ■ Unknown timing of library construction ■ Directs pedestrians/bikes to a currently undeveloped Balfour Park ■ Pursue Additional Grant 0 . I ortunities to Close Fundin: Ga Option #2 ■ $505,000 for University/City Hall segment ■ $698,000 for Evergreen to Sullivan segment ■ Total Additional Funds Needed - $1.2 Million ■ Amend State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) LA SPOKANE VALLEY - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Option #3 ■ Continue with Evergreen to Sullivan Project as Initially Scoped ■ Revise Project Limits of the University to Balfour Segment to Terminate at Dartmouth Rd ■ Extending the Trail to Balfour Park May Be Premature ■ Unknown timing of library construction ■ Directs pedestrians/ bikes to a currently undeveloped Balfour Park ■ Pursue Additional Grant Opportunities to Close Funding Gap ■ $110,000 for University/City Hall segment ■ $698,000 for Evergreen to Sullivan segment ■ Total Additional Funds Needed - $808,000 ■ Amend State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) LA SPOKANE VALLEY - ECONONMC DEVELOPMENT Option #4 ■ Spokane Regional Transportation Council (SRTC) Suggestion ■ Repackage Both Projects to Fully Fund the Design and Construction of the Evergreen to Sullivan Segment and Forgo the University to Balfour Park Segment ■ Total Estimated Cost: $2,343,000 ■ Total Funding Available by Repackaging: $2,400,000 ■ Amend State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) ■ oses t e ' ysica ap int e rai ■ Pursue Additional Grant Opportunities for the University to Balfour Park segment ■ $860,000 to $1,650,000 depending on limits ■ Allows City to Evaluate Trail Extensions west of University ■ Amend State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) LA SPOKANE VALLEY - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Next Steps ■ Staff Recommends Moving Forward with Option #4 ■ Repackage Both Projects - Evergreen to Sullivan & University to Balfour Park ■ Fully Funds the Evergreen to Sullivan segment of the Trail ■ Closes the Physical Gap in the Trail ■ Council Motion of Preferred Option ■ Request Scope Revisions to SRTC and Amend the STIP SPOKANE VALLEY - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 11 APPLEWAY TRAIL ALIGNMENT OVERVIEW E BroaCraq Ave F e� E9!oa0vsv Ave : E BmedWavA Eproed* Are 6. Corbin to City Limit Completed 2008 1 2 Lihivrsity/o Pines 3. Pines to Eve een Corrjpleted 2 i5 m= Completed 2O1 4. Evergreen to; Sullivan Design 2018 Construction 2020 d 1 5. Sullivan to Corbin Construction 2018 TIMELINE SUMMARY Year Balfour Park to University to University Pines Pines to Evergreen Evergreen to Sullivan Sullivan to Corbin Corbin to City Limit 2008 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Construction Planning Planning Planning Planning Planning Design Construction Design Construction Design Design Design Construction Construction Construction COST AND FUNDING SUMMARY TOTAL ESTIMATED COST: $10,645,000 FUNDING SECURED TO DATE: $9,047,000 FUNDING OPPORTUNITY SOUGHT: $1,598,000 FUTURE CONSIDERATIONS The cost estimates identified in this brochure include only asphalt pathways, street crossing safety elements, and minimal landscaping and lighting. The goal of the City is to develop a master plan for the Appleway Trail and develop it as a linear park that includes restrooms, drinking fountains, playgrounds, community gardens, outdoor exercise equipment, directional and interpretive signs, bicycle trails, and varyingtypes of open space. Additionally, it's proposed that the sections of the trail would be developed around unique themes highlighting Spokane Valley's legacy, history, culture, geology, and future. The City continues to seek opportunities to develop and implement the Appleway Trail. Spokane 1.Valley FOR MORE INFORMATION www.spokanevalley.org/ApplewayTrail economicdevelopment@spokanevalley.org (509) 720-5000 : A L F s1TL� The Appleway Trail has revitalized an underutilized 5.2 -mile stretch of the Milwaukee Railroad right-of-way that was an eyesore due to being overgrown with vegetation and debris from unauthorized dumping. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Transform the abandoned Milwaukee Railroad right-of-way into an urban trail that transforms the corridor into a recreational and economic asset to the City of SpokaneValleythatis manageable, affordable, and safe. The Appleway Trail will contribute to the quality of life, attract visitors, and create a community that is attractive for businesses to locate and expand. The themed Appleway Trail will invite and provide a diverse set of users opportunities to improve their health, meet with friends, and create new connections in their community by incorporating a variety of recreational opportunities and park amenities. Spokane _Valley TOTAL ESTIMATED COST: $10,645,000 FUNDING SECURED TO DATE: $9,047,000 FUNDING OPPORTUNITY SOUGHT: $1,598,000 The Appleway Trail is a regional asset for increasing physical fitness and improving health, building community connections, and enhancing Spokane Valley's identity. This conceptual drawing depicts the view eastward from within the University Plaza entrance. BACKGROUND Originally, the Milwaukee Railroad ran across the valley floor through agricultural lands. Later the railroad tracks were abandoned and then removed. The abandoned Milwaukee Railroad right-of-way had remained undeveloped and held in reserve for future transportation needs. Located in the heart of the City of Spokane Valley, a thriving city of nearly 100,000 people, the right-of-way had become overgrown with vegetation and filled with debris from unauthorized dumping. It was an unsafe eyesore dividing neighborhoods south of the corridor from commercial areas to the north. A collaborative agreement between the City of Spokane Valley, Spokane County (owner of the corridor) and Spokane Transit Authority, has allowed the City to develop the property as a themed urban trail and linear park that accommodates non -motorized transportation users. City of Spokane Valley, 10210 E. Sprague Avenue, Spokane Valley, WA 99206 1 (509) 720-5000 1 www.spokanevalley.org/ApplewayTrail BALFOUR PARK TO UNIVERSITY Additional funding being sought. Status: Design to begin 2018; Construction planned 2019. This section of the trail will move from Balfour Park to University Plaza. This stretch of trail will use existing street frontage to bring trail users from Appleway to City Hall and beyond to Balfour Park and the proposed future library. This section of trail includes landscaping, trail amenities such as benches and trash receptacles, and a pedestrian/bike crossing across Sprague Avenue. TOTAL ESTIMATED COST: $1,650,000 TOTAL SECURED FUNDING: $750,000 , FUNDING GAP: 1900 000 City Hall opened in fall of 2017 Eventually a spur off of the Appleway Trail will connect residents and visitors directly to the local businesses and services at the commercial and civic heart of the City. FUNDING: TAP - $199,000 1 CMAQ - $450,000 1 CITY MATCH - $101,000 UNIVERSITY TO PINES Status: Trail completed in Spring 2015. Enhancements programmed for a future date. In the first days and weeks after opening University Road to Pines Road, the Appleway Trail was already becoming part of residents' lives. University Plaza greets trail users at University and Pines. The Plaza includes a seating area with a grove of trees and plantings recallingthe area's rich agricultural history and natural environment. Continuing east users enter the heart of the trail a lighted 12 -foot multi -use paved pathway. This section includes natural grasses and trees along with benches, trash receptacles and drinking fountains. Future plans, funded by legislative appropriatoin, call for a restroom, directional and interpretative signage as well as park amenities suited to the theme. TOTAL COST: $2,156,000 FUNDING: CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY - $1,615,000 1 LEGISLATIVE APPROPRIATION - $541,000 PINES TO EVERGREEN Status: Trail completed in 2017. Enhancements programmed for a future date. The design for this section of the trail is reminiscent of the gently rolling hills of the Palouse Prairie. In addition to trees and wildflowers, this section of the trail includes native ornamental grasses and opportunities for natural play that inspires children to spend time playing outdoors and exploring their local environment. TOTAL COST: $2,134,000 Plantings reminiscent of the area's natural environment will enhance enjoyment of the trail with the fragrances of native grasses and evergreens. FUNDING: TAP - $643,000 1 STP - $1,203,000 1 CITY MATCH - $288,000 EVERGREEN TO SULLIVAN Additional funding being sought. Status: Design and construction contingent upon funding. The design for this section of the Appleway Trail will be developed in collaboration with the community. ltwill provide adults, seniors, children and families with opportunities to improve their health by offering a wide array of amenities to spur active living and offer enjoyment to all users. It will eventually include exercise stations, bicycle terrain courses and various open spaces. TOTAL ESTIMATED COST: TOTAL SECURED FUNDING: FUNDING GAP: $2,343,000 $1,645,000 $698,000 The multi -use pathway of the Appleway Trail welcomes more than pedestrian and bicycle users. The different segments of the Trail will provide a diverse experience for users like this potential exercise equipment. FUNDING: CMAQ FUNDS - $1,423,000 1 CITY MATCH - $222,000 SULLIVAN TO CORBIN Funding secured. Status: Design complete; Construction planned 2018. The design for this section of the Appleway Trail has been developed in collaboration with the community. It will provide a completed pathway, landscaping and amenities such as benches, trailhead and restrooms to accommodate people of all ages and abilities, for both recreation and for daily travel through the community. TOTAL ESTIMATED COST: $2,363,000 A variety of amenities including benches and restrooms will enhance the trail, enabling people of all ages and abilities to use the corridor for daily travel and recreation. FUNDING: LEGISLATIVE APPROPRIATION - $970,000 1 RCO FUNDS - $813,000 1 CITY MATCH - $580,000 City of Spokane Valley, 10210 E. Sprague Avenue, Spokane Valley, WA 99206 1 (509) 720-5000 1 www.spokanevalley.org/ApplewayTrail CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: February 27, 2018 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ['consent ❑ old business ['new business ['public hearing ['information ® admin. report ['pending legislation ['executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Potential Transportation Grants — Call for Projects: Washington State Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board (FMSIB) GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 35.77.010 six-year TIP; RCW 47.06A Freight Mobility PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Resolution 17-011 - Adoption of the 2018-2023 Six - Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP), May 23, 2017; Approved motion to apply for Surface Transportation Preservation (STP) funds for the Argonne Road — Indiana to Montgomery Concrete Reconstruction Project; March 25, 2014. BACKGROUND: On January 15, 2018, the FMSIB issued a Call for Projects that improve the movement of freight and/or mitigate the movement of freight through local communities. The program funds will be available for two construction windows: $10 million between 2019-2021 and $15 million between 2021-2023. Awarded funding can only be spent on the Construction (CN) phase of the project. The minimum match is 20 percent; however, most projects that compete have a 50 percent or higher match. Due to the scale of the identified projects discussed below, multiple funding sources are anticipated in order to fully fund any given project. Funds are awarded based on the presumption that the project will be completely funded by the designated award biennium. Generally, the City has used awarded FMSIB funds as the first funding source to large projects. Awarded funds are typically leveraged to secure additional grant funds from other sources. For example, FMSIB awarded a $2 Million grant to the Sullivan Road West -Bridge Replacement Project (10% of total project cost) and up to $10 Million to the Barker Road Grade Separation Project (20% of the total project cost, with a maximum award of $10 Million). FMSIB applications are due March 30, 2018. Staff has reviewed the grant scoring criterion and compared it to the City's 2018-2023 TIP, Pavement Management Program, Comprehensive Plan, and other elements of the City's transportation network. Staff anticipates that the projects proposed below will score well and have potential to receive funding. Please note that estimated project costs are planning -level preliminary estimates and are anticipated to change as more information becomes available and the grant applications are finalized. Projects identified in Table 1 are included in the City's 6 -Year TIP. TABLE 1. Potential FMSIB Projects List FMSIB Project Name Total Estimated FMSIB Request Secured Funds Cost (%) Amount ($) Source Argonne Road — Indiana to Montgomery Concrete Reconstruction' $5,800,000 $1,160,000 (20%) $0 Barker Road Widening — Spokane River to SR 2902(20%) $8,400,000 $1,680,000 $106,5003 City 'Project has been included in the City's 6 -year TIP since 2013. 'Project has been included in the City's 6 -year TIP since 2014. 'The Engineering phase (PE) is City -funded at $106,500 from Fund 303, to initiate the Euclid to Garland phase. OPTIONS: Discussion. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Discussion. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: FMSIB funds are preferred to be expended in the designated biennium ('19-`21 or '21-'23). If the project receives award but is not ready to obligate funds at that time, the project funding may be pushed to the subsequent biennium. The maximum grant amount under this program is 80% of the total project cost. The amount of grant funds awarded is dependent on the project's benefit to freight traffic and is typically less than the total project's 80% value. STAFF CONTACTS: Adam Jackson — Planning & Grants Engineer Mike Basinger — Economic Development Manager ATTACHMENTS: Project Summary Sheets, PowerPoint Presentation 11. Argonne—Indiana to Montgomery n LL ii Mmeld d a obir S Sharinor7 i., zw r MichlelII. , E ii C'Vt m Iro aria F Sys 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 project Description; Argonne Road from Indiana to Montgomery Avenues is about a 1/4 mile (14O01, 7 -lane asphalt concrete pavement that has ade- quate capacity for the traffic that is there today and expected traffic that will use the facility over the next 20 years. Rut the rind is quickly failing and has gone past the point where pavement preservation is an option. Afull reconstruction is required. The solution is to fully reconstruct this roadway by rebuilding the base and constructing a thick structural reinforced l'urtland ce- ment concrete pavement surface_ In addition, all pedestrian sidewalks and wheelchair ramps will be upgraded to rrleet ADA re- quirements_ Benefits of Protect: The City of Spokane Valley's Pavement Management Analysis Report (HOAR) allows staff to be good stewards by providing up-to- date roadway condition information whe.ri snlecting projects. The PMAR has identified Argonne Road as a rnronstruct_ With the high amount of traffic on this street and the high maintenance dollars being spent to maintain this roadway it makes sense to invest in reconstructing this roadway using concrete rather than continuing to spend scarce resources trying to preserve It. Pav- ing this street with concrete will provide a long design life. 20. Barker—Euclid to Trent r I In c. i IV Y UJ VP 0 Euclid Euclid 'a,tairi4s Euclid r n 7 Pieit "if,9ountaIn View ,Yac5' C' ' IC • ' , ace Grace ." Buckeye tl 2018 2019 1 2020 2021 2022 2023 Project Description: Barker Road from the Spokane River to Euclid intersection will be widened to a 3 -lane arterial with 1 lane in each direction and a middle turn lane, and will include bike lanes, sidewalk and swales. Benefits of Project: Barker Road accesses the heart of the city's industrial area grid traffic is expected to grow by 3R% by year 2040. Widening the road anticipates future growth and will be in place as tht industrial land 1s developed_ New hike lanes and sidewalks will extend access to Trent Ave (SR -290) and neighborhoods on the north side of the highway and east to Otis Orchards along Wellesley Avenue. 25. Barker—Spokane River to Euclid EUCIitl; Mountain Fairview` i alrullr . Mountain II View it— .Gree Grace . E • 1 rg n - to Marietta _ 401; 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Project Description:. Barker Road from the Spokane. River to Euclid Intersection will be widened to a 3 -lane arterial with 1 lane in each direction and a middle turn lane, and will inc.lurle bike lanes, sidewalks and swales. Benefits of Project: Barker Rnnd accesses the heart of the city's industrial area and traffic is expected to grow.by 38% by year 2040. Widening the rood anticipates future growth and will ho in place as the Industrial land is developed. Adding bike lanes and sidewalks will ex- tend access to the Centennial "hall along the Spokane River, STA bus stop Route S, and to various commercial businesses.. Potential Grant Opportunity Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board (FMSIB) February 27, 2018 Adam Jackson, P.E. Planning & Grants Engineer Economic Development Division SPOKANE VALLEY - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 1 WHAT IS FMSIB? WA State Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board • Facilitates freight movement between and among local, national and international markets which enhances trade opportunities. • Works towards solutions that lessen the impact of freight movements on local communities. SPOKANE VALLEY - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 2 FMSIB PROGRAM • Projects must be located on a Strategic Freight Corridor ■T1: >10 Mil annual tons ■T2: 4 Mil - 10 Mil annual tons Bigelow Gulch Rd ley Springs erick Av> Wellesley Ave W nsfiel Pie ra. ue Ave TONNAGE CLASS T1 -T5 ANNUAL TONS tin thousands) 4th A d Ave co m 37th A Madison Rd Bede Terre Ave Spokane Valley and FMSIB 2018 is the third call for projects since 2010: u Ivan ' oa TTest : ri ge ' ep acement o war • 2010 -Barker Road/BNSF Grade Separation - 20% Award ($10 M max) • 2016 -Argonne Road &I-90 Bridge Replacement - No Award • 2018 -Applications Due March 30. Sullivan Road West Bridge Barker Road Grade Separation Project 2018 FMSIB FUNDING $10 Million available 2019-2021 $15 Million available 2021-2023 • Applications Due • Preliminary Award Interviews ■ Final Project Awards • Max Award SPOKANE r VALLEY — ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT March 30 May 1 June 1 80% y® �® YOpanm0IH401n404MMI0n Phaas R. 000411 Deane rel Co Local /agency Federal Ald ProJncl Prospectus W .F CHT MOBILITY 1ISAIEGIC INVESTMENT BOND a Pm:N.11,1019 Mr. Blll ILINy City o[sn spiio V,II:y secs]. veer, Wasb r_, Suite 105 sp^e000v.Ilzx a�,�nmxeor 992.06,74 n'^Barter Road....F Grade 4.n.r.ua^ rev sots trusses! Highs, Pr.i¢Ll Pro,rnm Yo Endo 'alt Luaing aparil Penni!, 11q;,- T P in;;d N.`.plcnied 1 N aclo,_no., "MHPpJ �ia kd F Oe0. � Pc am c..lh.v4 lme ofoksPara, ru.A a�a ms sz _un ord. to - mck reulb e �blc 1 __ 5 2018 RECOMMENDED PROJECTS Argonne Road Indiana to Montgomery ARGONNE - PROJECT SUMMARY ■ T-1 Corridor Designation ■ 2018-2023 TIP # 11 ■ Average Daily Traffic (ADT): 36,000 ■ Estimated Total Project Cost $5.8 Million ■ Project Scope: - Remove and Replace (R&R) 7 -lanes of asphalt pavement with a rebuilt subgrade and structurally reinforced concrete pavement. All sidewalk curb ramps and street crossings will be updated to comply with current regulations as applicable. LA SPOKANE VALLEY - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 7 ARGONNE - PROJECT SUMMARY • Avg. Pavement Condition Index Score - 30 • Project Length: Approx. 1,400 Ft • Corridor Connections: • North: Argonne Road, Trent Ave (SR 290), Bigelow Gulch Road, Town of Millwood • South: Dishman-Mica, I-90, Sprague/Appleway E buokeyevtbJCKeyerjv Ynrk.Aye at•' E Montgomery Ave E Mansfield Ave � Y E 6' ithie¢i r t z n Z d NCCdAve FsNI '� 90VY 9?FY 190 E187FRarpP E Montgomery Ave i wyk 4 Pyr'.... E Montgomery Ave E Montgomery A c E Shannon AveE 1 Z E i 90 W287 OFF R801) 07 tit 9c1" a C'• 9fl E tt gOC29-r a z E MtesionAve 9 � An Ave ui E Mission Ave E M eelen Are E Nora z F MisinnA LA SPOKANE VALLEY — ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 8 BARKER - PROJECT SUMMARY ■ T-2 Corridor Designation (Spokane River to Euclid) • T-3 Corridor Designation (Euclid to SR 290) ■ 2018-2023 TIP # 20 & 25 ■ Average Daily Traffic (ADT): ■ 13,000 (Spokane Riverto Euclid) ■ 6,600 (Euclid to SR 290) ■ Estimated Total Project Cost $8.4 Million • Project Scope: Widen to 3 lane arterial, provide 10' wide shared -use path; partner with County sewer install. Barker Road Spokane Riverto Trent LA SPOKANE VALLEY - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 9 BARKER - PROJECT SUMMARY • Estimated Total Project Cost $8.4 Million ■ Garland to Grade Separation - $2.1 Million • Euclid to Garland - $2.5 Million 2400 Linear Feet • Spokane River to Euclid - $3.8 Million 2800 Linear Feet - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT u miskLifor, PROJECT FUNDING SUMMARY Project Name Total Estimated Cost FMSIB Request Secured Funds Amount($) Source Argonne Road - Indiana to Montgomery Concrete Reconstruction $5,800,000 $1,160,000 (20%) $0 - Barker Road Widening - Spokane River to SR 290(20%) $8,400,000 $1,680,000 $106,5002 City 'Match dollars may be from sources other than City funds, such as other grant programs. 2The Engineering phase (PE) is City -funded at $106,500 from Fund 303, to initiate the Euclid to Garland phase. SPOKANE VALLEY - ECONOM/C DEVELOPMENT 11 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: February 27, 2018 Check all that apply: ['consent ❑ old business ['information ® admin. report Department Director Approval: ❑ ['new business ['public hearing ['pending legislation ['executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Renewal of Economic Development funds for Crave! 2018 GOVERNING LEGISLATION: Not applicable PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: In February 2017, the City Council approved a partnership with Vision Marketing and Adam Hegsted to host Crave! on June 15-18, 2017, at CenterPlace. BACKGROUND: In 2015, the City began a tourism study to develop strategies to increase overnight stays and tourism related spending. The study was conducted by Community Attributes Inc. (CAI) in two phases. In phase I, CAI developed a tourism enhancement strategy and a list of projects through a series of workshops, interviews and surveys with stakeholders and City Council. In Phase II, CAI is analyzing the potential feasibility and return on investment of six projects. One of the projects studied was the development of new events and festivals based in Spokane Valley that complement ValleyFest and generate tourism. In 2017, the City partnered with Vision Marketing and Adam Hegsted to host Crave! June 15-18 at CenterPlace. The cost of the sponsorship was $50,000 for 2017, but a portion of these funds was returned to the City through the rental fees associated with CenterPlace. The contract was renewable with up to four annual extensions. Ticket sales for Crave! were very strong for an inaugural event — attended by more than 2,000 from eleven states and Canada; 40 regional chefs showcased; more than 235 reported hotel stays; and there was significant media coverage and digital media interest. In 2018, Crave! has been scheduled for July 12-15. The event has been moved to July to take advantage of warmer weather and the anticipated Phase 1 improvements to the west lawn at CenterPlace. Ticket sales so far are strong and the number of chefs featured will increase to about 60. The selection of food and artisans will be increased at the Grand Tastings on Friday and Saturday. It is anticipated that attendance and local hotel stays will grow as the event gains momentum in its second year. Vision Marketing received $30,000 through the City's Lodging Tax revenue appropriation process in January 2018 to support this year's Crave! event. The City proposes to supplement the lodging tax dollars with $20,000 in currently budgeted 2018 Economic Development marketing funds. OPTIONS: Discussion RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Seeking Council consensus to bring this item to the March 13, 2018 Council Agenda for a motion approval consideration. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Cost of sponsorship in 2018 is $50,000: $30,000 from the LTAC process and $20,000 from the currently budgeted 2018 Economic Development marketing funds. The City's cost in subsequent years could come from a combination of Lodging Tax funds, depending on the outcome of future Lodging Tax Advisory Committee meetings, and Economic Development marketing funds. STAFF CONTACT: Mike Basinger, Economic Development Manager Lesli Brassfield, Economic Development Specialist ATTACHMENTS: Crave! Presentation Tourism Strategy: Event Development City of Spokane Valley Economic Development Division City Council Presentation, February 27, 2018 LA SPOKANE VALLEY - ECONONMC DEVELOPMENT SpokaneValleyTourism and Lodging Analysis • Completed March -December 2016 • Community Attributes, Inc. ■ Tourism profile developed • Strategic themes, goals and actions identified SPOKANE VALLEY ECONOM9C DEVELOPMENT 2 Strategic Themes SPOKANE VALLEY - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT • Lodging market draws both business travelers and families; 1-90 is a big benefit • Spokane river, local trails and parks, and proximity to major recreation corridors are opportunities on which to build • Retail cluster is a big attraction • Regional & local facilities can support more event development (CenterPlace, fairgrounds, etc.) 3 Goals & Actions ■ Enhance tourism segments that are successful (keep what's working) • Grow Spokane Valley's presence in regional events and promote local destinations ■ Create new attractions that position the city as a tourism destination ■ Invest in long-term improvements to make Spokane Valley more attractive SPOKANE VALLEY - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 4 Spokane Valley events Regional tourism attractions: ■ Spokane Valley Arts Council Showcase and Auction - May 12 ■ Crave! - July 12-15 NEW ■ Cycle Celebration - July 29 ■ Valleyfest - Sept. 22-23 ■ Oktoberfest - Sept. 28-30 NEwr SPOKANE VALLEY ECONOM9C DEVELOPMENT 5 KREM chef Chad White talks Crave! Food and Drink celebration AN EXPERIENCE FOODIES WILL CRAVE CRAVE! FOOD & DRINK CELEBRATION STARTS TM RW. ood & Drl cos bens nalwaaans Wcancoeses mean es dweione me awn.. wawa sex all wear nag. Crave NW Food & Drink Celebration, Spokane Valley eventCrave Neeisa mawin showcase the,rey e talents of visionary chefs fmmamund the Northwest. The event wnlfeature awlde ornery aloof regional and onal flavors from fresh seafood andrranch-raised meats to farm -to - table pradreeand inventivedesserts Culinary highlights for Octane event include a Grand Tasting Tent. Global Street Foods Carnivala. Seafood Bash. de Si Smoke Fare and a Fathers Day Brunch, In addition to artisan food samplings. Crave kW offers wine, craft beerand specialty cocktail testings. with an emphasis on Northwest producers and Ingredients. Adistinguished group Of award-winning brewmasters. CoNee roatters.wineenekers, distillersand rowel.. nes will .resent a bountiful arra SPOKANE VALLEY - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT northwest TRAWELpLIFE The culinary and creative farce behind Crave NW Is Spokane chef and testa urateur Adam Herded, Chef- erof The Wandering Table, The Gilded unlcorn.vards Bruncheen and going On right nowtnaurreglon, and Crave NW will help us germ thenal levet" Crave NW willbe heldfune 15 to 18, 2017, at Centenarian, laRegional Event Center, a 54,000-s aero -root event Crave! 2017 First Year: ■ Crave! coordinated by Vision Marketing • Event held at CenterPlace, June 15-18 • More than 40 participating local and regional chefs • Attendance = 2,000 plus, representing 11 states & Canada 6 KREM2 chef Chad White talks Crave! Food and Drink celebration Crave! BACK TN LOG{EMEM Ceieunin Lawn OyeEdeet ilmerieda Cm -cease cum Sams AN EXPERIENCE FOODIES WILL CRAVE CRAVE! FOOD & DRINK CELEBRATION STARTS TM RW 1110 4104,11.111:11111 .1111.117.7.41,11PIN neeerl�. Crave NW Food & Drink Celebration, Spokane Valley enieaeenr�nary event that will showcase checreative talents ofvisienary chefs fmmamund the Nnrthweal. -heave. wlllfeature aortae variety aim., regional and international flavors frofresh seafood andranlm ch -raised meats to farm -to - table pradreeand inventivedesserta Culinary highlights for Octane event include a Grand Tasting Ten t. Global Street Foods Cambodia, Seafood Bash, Cite Si Smoke Fare and a Fathers Day Brunch, In addition to artisan food samplings. Crave kW offers wine, craft beer and specialty cocktail testings. with n emphasis on Norttwesl0,0000005 and Ingredients. /*distinguished group 0f award-winning brewmastert c0Nee reasters.winenwkers, dislillersand m weleglsts wit present a Mu ntiful array northwest THAW EL&LIFE The culinary and creative farce behind Crave NW Is Spokane chef and ,este uraam Negated. Chef- ownerof lfl, The Wandering Table, The Gilded unicorn. Yards Bruncheon and going an right hewineurreglon, and Crave NW will help us getae thanevt levet" Crave N W will be helafune 15 to td, , Center -Ware Event Center, a 54 000-squ0-lMOare-Foot event • More than 235 hotel stays reported • Significant local and regional publicity (all promotions mentioned Spokane Valley as the event host). • Print, digital, broadcast, and social media campaigns initiated • Facebook campaign results: • 931,678 impressions (people saw it) • 158,466 reach (unique people shown Crave NW SPOKANE VALLEY — ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT • 53,964 actions (people clicking or engaging with the digital ad) 7 Crave! 2018 ■ Moved event from June to July 12-15 (warmer weather, greener grounds) ■ Tickets went on sale in December. Sales are strong and ahead of last year. ■ Celebrity chefs are confirming participation - expect about 60 chefs ■ Great local representation of chefs; chefs also coming from Atlanta, Chicago, Seattle and other cities. SPOKANE VALLEY - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 8 Crave! • Expanding food and artisansforthe Grand Tastings • Expanding availability and role of beer and wine ■ Securing more local and national sponsorships, partnerships • Excited to incorporate west lawn renovations into event design Benefits of Continued Sponsorship SPOKANE VALLEY - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT • Generates greater awareness of Spokane Valley (locally & regionally) • Strengthens city's brand and identity • Generates additional lodging and retail spending, plus other economic benefits • Showcases area craft food and beverage products, restaurants 10 SPOKANE VALLEY ECONOM9C DEVELOPMENT • Showcases CenterPlace Regional Event Center as venue for similar activities • Provides seed capital until event can become self sustaining through other funding streams • Builds collaborative relationships with tourism partners ■ Provides local jobs 11 City Sponsorship: Crave! ■ 2017: City contributed $50,000 in economic development funds to help )MPANY launch this innovative culinary event. ■ Contract was renewable for up to five years, depending on other funding ■ 2018 January: $30,000 lodging tax revenue was awarded to Crave. ■ City proposes renewal of economic development funds in 2018, with reduction to $20,000. LA SPOKANE VALLEY - ECONONMC DEVELOPMENT 12 LA SPOKANE VALLEY - ECONONMC DEVELOPMENT 13 To: From: Re: DRAFT ADVANCE AGENDA as of February 22, 2018; 8:30 a.m. Please note this is a work in progress; items are tentative Council & Staff City Clerk, by direction of City Manager Draft Schedule for Upcoming Council Meetings March 6, 2018, Study Session, 6:00 p.m. ACTION ITEMS: 1. First Reading Ordinance 18-006, False Alarm Code Amendment — Morgan Koudelka NON -ACTION ITEMS: 2. Proposed Amended TIP — Colin Quinn -Hurst 3. Code Text Amendment, Small cell Facilities — Erik Lamb 4. Accomplishments Report (2017) 5. Advance Agenda fdue Tue, Feb 271 (10 minutes) (20 minutes) (15 minutes) (— 90 minutes) (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting: 140 mins] March 13, 2018, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. [due Tue Mar 61 1. PUBLIC HEARING: Proposed Amended 2018 TIP — Colin Quinn -Hurst (15 minutes) la. Proposed Resolution Amending 2018 TIP 2. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) 3. Second Reading Ordinance 18-006 False Alarm Code Amendment — Morgan Koudelka 4. First Reading Ordinance, 18-007, Small Cell — Erik Lamb 5. Motion Consideration: Crave Contract — Lesli Brassfield, Mike Basinger 6. Motion Consideration: Potential Grant Opportunities (FMSIB) — Adam Jackson 7. Admin Report: Potential Grant Opportunities (SRTC, SRTS, PBP, CSP) — Adam Jackson 8. Admin Report: GSI Contract — John Hohman, Mike Basinger 9. Advance Agenda March 20, 2018, Study Session, 6:00 p.m. 1. 8th Ave. Sidewalk — Thierman to Dickey - Erica Amsden, Gloria Mantz 2. Floodplain FEMA Process — Henry Allen 3. Painted Hills Update — John Hohman, Cary Driskell, Erik Lamb 4. Street O&M Pavement Preservation & Street Construction — Adam Jackson, Mike Basinger 5. Advance Agenda (5 minutes) (10 minutes) (15 minutes) (15 minutes) (20 minutes) (20 minutes) (15 minutes) (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting: 120 mins] [due Tue Mar 131 (10 minutes) (15 minutes) (25 minutes) (60 minutes) (5 minutes) March 27, 2018, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. 1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) 2. Second reading ordinance 18-007 Small Cell — Erik Lamb [*estimated meeting: 115 mins] fdue Tue Mar 201 (5 minutes) (15 minutes) 3. Motion Consideration: Potential Grant Opportunities (SRTC, SRTS, PBP, CSP) — Adam Jackson (10 mins) 4. Admin Report: Outside Agency, Allocation History/Discussion — Chelsie Taylor (20 minutes) 5. Admin Report: Economic Analysis of Tourism Related Venues & Events — Chelsie Taylor (45 minutes) 6. Advance Agenda (5 minutes) 7. Info Item: Department Reports [*estimated meeting: 115 mins] April 3, 2018, Study Session, 6:00 p.m. [due Tue Mar 271 ACTION ITEMS: 1. Motion Consideration, Sprague Ave. Preser. Project -Sullivan to Corbin — E.Amsden, Gloria Mantz (15 min) NON -ACTION ITEMS: 2. Airport Update — Larry Krauter (15 minutes) Draft Advance Agenda 2/22/2018 12:49:34 PM Page 1 of 2 April 10, 2018, Formal Meetin2 Format, 6:00 p.m. [due Tue April 31 1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) (5 minutes) April 17, 2018, Study Session, 6:00 p.m. [due Tue April 101 ACTION ITEMS: 1. Motion Consideration: 8t' Ave. Sidewalk, Thierman to Dickey- E. Amsden, G.Mantz (10 minutes) NON -ACTION ITEMS: 2. Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins (5 minutes) April 24, 2018, Formal Meetin2 Format, 6:00 p.m. [due Tue April 171 1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) (5 minutes) 2. Info Item: Department Reports Mav 1, 2018, Studv Session, 6:00 p.m. [due Tue April 241 1. Advance Agenda Mav 8, 2018, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. 1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) Mav 15, 2018, Studv Session, 6:00 p.m. 1. Advance Agenda Mav 22, 2018, Formal Meetin2 Format, 6:00 p.m. 1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) 2. Info Item: Department Reports May 29, 2018, Study Session, 6:00 p.m. 1. Advance Agenda *time for public or Council comments not included [due Tue May 11 (5 minutes) [due Tue Mav 81 [due Tue Mav 151 (5 minutes) [due Tue May 221 OTHER PENDING AND/OR UPCOMING ISSUES/MEETINGS: Animal Control Regulations (SVMC 7.30) Street Illumination (ownership, cost, location) Camping in RVs Tobacco 21 Resolution Citizen Recognition (city keys) Transportation & Infrastructure City Hall Generator SV Youth Voices Donation Recognition Utility Facilities in ROW Duplex/Single Family Dwellings Definition 2018 Budget Amendment Governance Manual ITS/SRTMC Discussion Legislative Remote Testimony (Chambers) Naming City Facilities Protocol Neighborhood Restoration Program Police Dept Quarterly Rpt (April, July, Oct, Jan) Police Precinct Lease Renewal (Nov '18) Retail Recruitment Follow-up Sign Ordinance Draft Advance Agenda 2/22/2018 12:49:34 PM Page 2 of 2 City of Spokane Valley Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 01/01/2018 - 01/31/2018 Page Title 1 Cover Sheet 2 Pre -Application Meetings Requested 3 Online Applications Received 4 Construction Applications Received 5 Land Use Applications Received 6 Construction Permits Issued 7 Land Use Applications Approved 8 Development Inspections Performed 9 Code Enforcement 10 Revenue 11 Building Permit Valuations Printed 02/06/2018 09:55 Page 1 of 11 Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 01/01/2018 - 01/31/2018 Pre -Application Meetings Requested A Pre -Application Meeting is a service provided to help our customers identify the code requirements related to their project proposal. Community & Public Works Department scheduled a total of 16 Pre -Application Meetings in January 2018. Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Land Use Pre -Application MN Commercial Pre -App Meeting Commercial Pre -App Land Use Pre -Application Meeting Monthly Totals Annual Total To -Date: 16 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Se 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Oct Nov Dec 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Printed 02/06/2018 09:55 Page 2 of 11 Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 01/01/2018 - 01/31/2018 Online Applications Received Community & Public Works Department received a total of 225 Online Applications in January 2018. 300 200 100 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Trade Permit Sign Permit ;I Right of Way Permit Reroof Permit Pre -Application Meeting Request Demolition Permit Other Online Applications - Approach Permit Approach Permit Demolition Permit Other Online Applications Pre -Application Meeting Request Reroof Permit Right of Way Permit Sign Permit Trade Permit Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 136 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 85 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Monthly Totals 225 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Annual Total To -Date: Printed 02/06/2018 09:55 225 Page 3 of 11 Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 01/01/2018 - 01/31/2018 Construction Applications Received Community & Public Works Department received a total of 422 Construction Applications in January 2018. Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Commercial - New ,y ,ur Commercial - TI Residential - New = Other Construction Permits Commercial - New Commercial - TI Residential - New Commercial - Trade Residential - Trade Residential - Accessory Demolition Sign Other Construction Permits Monthly Totals Annual Total To -Date: Printed 02/06/2018 09:56 422 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 38 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 51 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 *6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 *8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 *270 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Page 4 of 11 *Includes Online Applications. Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 01/01/2018 - 01/31/2018 Land Use Applications Received Community & Public Works Department received a total of 75 Land Use Applications in January 2018. 100 50 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec giv, Boundary Line Adjustment Short Plat Preliminary 'Fa l Long Plat Preliminary Binding Site Plan Preliminary Final Platting Zoning Map/Comp Plan Amendment State Environmental Polity Act (SEPA) Administrative Exception/Interpretation Other Land Use Permits Boundary Line Adjustment Short Plat Preliminary Long Plat Preliminary Binding Site Plan Preliminary Final Platting Zoning Map/Comp Plan Amendment State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Administrative Exception/Interpretation Other Land Use Permits M Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 63 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 onthly Totals 75 Annual Total To -Date: Printed 02/06/2018 09:56 75 Page 5 of 11 Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 01/01/2018 - 01/31/2018 Construction Permits Issued Community & Public Works Department issued a total of 408 Construction Permits in January 2018. 600 400 200 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Commercial - New Commercial - TI Residential - New = Other Construction Permits Commercial - New Commercial - TI Residential - New Commercial - Trade Residential - Trade Residential - Accessory Demolition Sign Other Construction Permits Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 37 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 58 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 255 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Monthly Totals 408 Annual Total To -Date: Printed 02/06/2018 09:57 408 Page 6 of 11 t Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 01/01/2018 - 01/31/2018 Land Use Applications Approved Community & Public Works Department approved a total of 29 Land Use Applications in January 2018. 40 20 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Boundary Line Adjustment Short Plat Preliminary Lew Long Plat Preliminary Binding Site Plan Preliminary Final Platting Zoning Map/Comp Plan Amendment State Environmental Polity Act (SEPA) Administrative Exception/Interpretation Other Land Use Permits Boundary Line Adjustment Short Plat Preliminary Long Plat Preliminary Binding Site Plan Preliminary Final Platting Zoning Map/Comp Plan Amendment State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Administrative Exception/Interpretation Other Land Use Permits M Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 onthly Totals 29 Annual Total To -Date: Printed 02/06/2018 09:57 29 Page 7 of 11 Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 01/01/2018 - 01/31/2018 Development Inspections Performed Community & Public Works Department performed a total of 1053 Development Inspections in January 2018. Development Inspections include building, planning, engineering and ROW inspections. 2,000 1,500 1,000 500 0 2018 2017 2016 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec —•— 2016 2017 2018 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Totals 1,053 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 965 773 1,354 1,351 1,726 1,665 1,356 1,742 1,450 1,609 1,368 1,108 764 958 1,333 1,390 1,445 1,563 1,283 1,453 1,553 1,529 1,510 1,072 Printed 02/06/2018 09:58 Page 8 of 11 Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 01/01/2018 - 01/31/2018 Code Enforcement Code Enforcement Officers responded to 99 citizen requests in the month of January. They are listed by type below. Please remember that all complaints, even those that have no violation, must be investigated. Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec CE -Stop Work Order Environmental General Nuisance ® Property Complaint, Non -Violation CE -Stop Work Order Complaint, Non -Violation Environmental General Nuisance Property Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 75 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Monthly Totals 99 0 Annual Total To -Date: Printed 02/06/2018 09:58 99 Page 9 of 11 Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 01/01/2018 - 01/31/2018 Revenue Community & Public Works Department Revenue totaled $83,564 in January 2018. 350,000 300,000 250,000 200,000 150,000 100,000 50,000 Jan 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Feb - 2018 2017 Five -Year Trend Mar Apr May 2018 Trend 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov $83,564 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $141,336 $114,162 $200,027 $177,570 $255,932 $239,522 $168,601 $161,655 $158,931 $175,153 $136,687 $114,587 $2,044,164 $185,045 $153,153 $153,939 $236,944 $318,163 $274,897 $156,278 $144,167 $159,789 $202,869 $250,078 $173,009 $2,408,331 $213,319 $191,658 $383,912 $196,705 $371,319 $243,029 $128,848 $271,684 $252,268 $208,349 $150,902 $133,482 $2,745,475 $74,775 $108,328 $161,174 $187,199 $123,918 $117,453 $162,551 $162,864 $99,587 $181,791 $99,627 $102,195 $1,581,462 $74,628 $66,134 $198,571 $160,508 $282,086 $152,637 $117,776 $127,540 $153,838 $149,197 $84,442 $97,689 $1,665,046 $158,912 $51,536 $102,538 $106,496 $184,176 $409,592 $277,553 $102,021 $129,174 $133,561 $98,386 $66,559 $1,820,504 Dec Totals $0 \ $83,564 Printed 02/06/2018 10:00 Page 10 of 11 Building Permit Valuation 2018 Trend 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 01/01/2018 - 01/31/2018 Community & Public Works Department Building Permit Valuation totaled $12,849,605 in January 2018. 80,000,000 60, 000, 000 40,000,000 20, 000, 000 Jan 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep ❑ct Nov Dec Feb Mar Apr --►- 2018 2017 - Five -Year Trend May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec $12.85M $0.00M $0.00M $0.00M $0.00M $0.00M $0.00M $0.00M $0.00M $0.00M $0.00M $0.00M $12.68M $12.32M $16.83M $15.22M $27.19M $22.33M $12.24M $14.94M $13.57M $11.13M $18.31M $7.24M $23.82M $18.37M $6.98M $31.20M $35.66M $35.70M $9.78M $9.05M $8.88M $10.14M $67.10M $16.78M t$273.46M $7.97M $28.14M $55.63M $10.09M $36.76M $19.11M $7.07M $41.60M $33.68M $9.13M $7.76M $5.52M 262.46M $2.93M $10.71M $8.07M $18.60M $6.73M $7.53M $5.05M $8.06M $5.15M $14.42M $5.86M $5.08M $3.18M $2.45M $9.90M $8.92M $34.58M $7.44M $6.37M $9.47M $12.01M $7.74M $3.60M $6.30M $25.49M $1.92M $3.59M $7.30M $22.22M $41.88M $32.91M $6.52M $8.11M $14.22M $7.25M $2.54M Totals Printed 02/06/2018 10:00 Page 11 of 11 $98.19M 111.96M Spokane �.�Valley Memorandum FINANCE DEPARTMENT Chelsie Taylor, Finance Director 10210 E Sprague Avenue • Spokane Valley WA 99206 Phone: (509) 720-5000 • Fax: (509) 720-5075 • www.spokanevalley.org To: Mark Calhoun, City Manager From: Chelsie Taylor, Finance Director Date: February 20, 2018 Re: Finance Department Activity Report — January 2018 Following is information pertaining to Finance Department activities through the end of January 2018 and included herein is an updated 2017 Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures through the end of December. For the next couple of months we'll focus our financial analysis on 2017 rather than 2018 because how 2017 wraps up will largely guide our decision making process as we progress towards the 2019 Budget development process. 2017 Yearend Process January of any year involves the process of shutting down one year and getting started on another. The workload includes processing separate batches of invoices related to either 2017 or 2018 and ultimately issuing 1099s to the variety of vendors from whom we make purchases throughout the year. Payroll work includes setting up new wage, health insurance and tax rates for 2018 and issuing W -2s for 2017. January is also when we begin closing books for 2017 and we hope to have this process complete by end of March. This process typically continues through March because we continue to receive additional information pertaining to 2017 for both revenues and expenditures (particularly construction related activity). Following the closing of the books, we will begin the process of preparing our annual financial report which will be finished by the end of May. We hope to have the State Auditor's Office on site by early June to begin the audit of 2017. Lodging Tax City Council performed an independent review of lodging tax grant applications after questions about the grant award process were raised by a community member following the LTAC meeting on October 191h. Council's review took place on November 21St, and following that independent review, Council developed its own proposal for the distribution of lodging tax revenues which was communicated to the LTAC for review and comment. The revised schedule leading to awarding funds is as follows: • August 30 Letters mailed to agencies that have historically received funding, media release to City website and notice to newspapers • October 6 Grant applications due at City Hall • October 19 Grant applicant presentations to LTAC • November 14 Admin report to Council on results of LTAC meeting • November 21 City Council independent review and proposal distribution of revenues • December 19 LTAC meets to review and comment on Council proposal • January 9 Council motion consideration: Awards of 2018 lodging tax grants P:IFinancelFinance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports1201812018 01 31 - 2017 12 PRELIMINARY No 2.docx Page 1 Budget to Actual Comparison Report A report reflecting 2017 Budget to Actual Revenues and Expenditures for those funds for which a 2017 Budget was adopted is located on pages 5 through 18. It's important to keep in mind that the figures included are preliminary and we anticipate they will continue to change as a result of the fact that we continue to receive invoices related to 2017 expenditure activity as well as some additional revenues. We will follow up with final 2017 figures once the books are closed. We've included the following information in the report: • Revenues by source for all funds, and expenditures by department in the General Fund and by type in all other funds. • A breakdown between recurring and nonrecurring revenues and expenditures in the General Fund, Street O&M Fund and Stormwater Fund. • The change in fund balance including beginning and ending figures. The beginning fund balance figures are those that are reflected in our 2016 Annual Financial Report. • Columns of information include: o The 2017 Budget as adopted o December 2017 activity o Cumulative 2017 activity through December 2017 o Budget remaining in terms of dollars o The percent of budgeted revenue collected or budgeted expenditures disbursed A few points related to the General Fund #001 (page 5): Recurring revenues collections are currently at 105.09% of the amount budgeted with 100.00% of the year elapsed. • Property tax are paid to Spokane County in two installments each year on April 30 and October 31 and are then remitted to the City primarily in May and November with lesser amounts typically remitted in June and December. Property taxes received thus far in 2017 are $11,613,056 or 99.99% of the amount budgeted. In January we received one final payment related to 2017 collections that is reflected herein. • Sales tax collections finished the year at $21,089,134 which was $1,237,034 or 6.23% greater than the amount budgeted. • Gambling taxes are at $292,777 or 85.73% of the amount budgeted. Gambling taxes are paid quarterly with fourth quarter payments due by January 31St. At this point we have not received and booked all 2017 revenues, but once received, we anticipate that 2017 revenues will approximate budgeted amounts. • Franchise Fee and Business Registration revenues are typically received in the month following a calendar year quarter. So far in 2017 we have received $988,851 or 82.40% of the amount budgeted. Fourth quarter franchise fees were received in February, and I anticipate actual revenues will exceed the budget estimate at that point. • State shared revenues are composed of State of Washington distributions that include items such as liquor board profits, liquor excise tax, streamlined sales tax mitigation and criminal justice monies. Most of these revenues are paid by the State in the month following a calendar quarter. These have collectively finished the year at $2,383,510 or 13.25% greater than the amount budgeted. • Fines and forfeitures revenues are composed of monthly remittances from Spokane County with payments made in the month following the actual assessment of a fine and false alarm fees. These have finished the year at $890,830 which is $470,170 or 34.55% Tess than the amount budgeted. P:IFinancelFinance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports1201812018 01 31 - 2017 12 PRELIMINARY No 2.docx Page 2 • Community Development service revenues are largely composed of building permit and plan review fees as well as right of way permits. Revenues finished the year at $2,219,671 or 53.15% greater than the amount budgeted. The amount collected is far in excess of the amount of the budget expectation primarily due to several large construction projects in the City that were permitted during 2017. • Recreation program fees are composed of revenues generated by the variety of parks and recreation programs including classes, swimming pools (in -season), and CenterPlace. The year ended with revenues totaling $711,489 or 11.01% greater than the amount budgeted. Recurring expenditures are currently at $35,865,664 or 89.30% of the amount budgeted with 100.00% of the year elapsed. Once all invoices related to 2017 activity are received and booked, we anticipate a higher percentage of the budget will be consumed. Investments (page 19) Investments at December 31 total $54,289,616 and are composed of $49,254,686 in the Washington State Local Government Investment Pool and $5,034,930 in bank CDs. Total Sales Tax Receipts (page 20) Total sales tax receipts reflect State remittances through December and total $23,837,199 including general, criminal justice, and public safety taxes. This figure is $1,396,548 or 6.22% greater than the same twelve-month period in 2016. Economic Indicators (pages 21 — 23) The following economic indicators provide information pertaining to three different sources of tax revenue that provide a good gauge of the health and direction of the overall economy. 1. Sales taxes (page 21) provide a sense of how much individuals and businesses are spending on the purchase of goods. 2. Hotel / Motel taxes (page 22) provide us with a sense of overnight stays and visits to our area by tourists or business travelers. 3. Real Estate Excise taxes (page 23) provide us with a sense of real estate sales. Page 21 provides a 10 -year history of general sales tax receipts (not including public safety or criminal justice) with monthly detail beginning January 2008. • Compared with calendar year 2016, 2017 collections have increased by $1,202,085 or 6.04%. • Tax receipts reached an all-time high in 2017 at $21,089,134, besting the previous record year of 2016 when $19,887,049 was collected. Sales tax receipts in 2017 exceeded $20 million for the first time since the City's incorporation. Page 22 provides a 10 -year history of hotel/motel tax receipts with monthly detail beginning January 2008. • Compared with calendar year 2016, 2017 collections have increased by $19,606 or 3.29%. • Collections reached an all-time high in 2017 of $615,980, exceeding the previous high set in 2016 of $596,374. Page 23 provides a 10 -year history of real estate excise tax receipts with monthly detail beginning January 2008. • Compared with calendar year 2016, 2017 collections have increased by $653,751 or 27.77%. • Collections reached an all-time high in 2017 of $3,007,573, exceeding the previous high set in 2007 of $2,589,681. P:IFinancelFinance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports1201812018 01 31 - 2017 12 PRELIMINARY No 2.docx Page 3 Debt Capacity and Bonds Outstanding (page 24) This page provides information on the City's debt capacity, or the dollar amount of General Obligation (G.O.) Bonds the City may issue, as well as an amortization schedule of the bonds the City currently has outstanding. • The maximum amount of G.O. bonds the City may issue is determined by the assessed value for property taxes which for 2017 is $8,124,487,663. Following the December 1, 2017 debt service payments, the City has $12,790,000 of nonvoted G.O. bonds outstanding which represents 10.50% of our nonvoted bond capacity, and 2.10% of our total debt capacity for all types of bonds. Of this amount: o $4,875,000 remains on bonds issued for the construction of CenterPlace. These bonds are repaid with a portion of the 1/10 of 1% sales tax that is collected by the Spokane Public Facilities District. o $865,000 remains on bonds issued for road and street improvements around CenterPlace. The bonds are repaid with a portion of the real estate excise tax collected by the City. o $7,050,000 remains on bonds issued for construction of the new City Hall. The bonds are to be repaid with General Fund revenues. Street Fund Revenue Sources (pages 25 and 26) The last two charts reflect a history for the two primary sources of revenue in Street Fund #101. These include: • Page 25 provides a 10 -year history of Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax collections with monthly detail beginning January 2008. o Compared with calendar year 2016, 2017 collections have increased by $26,418 or 1.31%. o Tax receipts peaked in 2007 at just approximately $2.1 million, and subsequently decreased to a range of approximately $1,857,000 to $2,000,000 in the years 2011 through 2017. • Page 26 provides a 6 -year history of Telephone Utility Tax collections with monthly detail beginning January 2009 (the month in which the tax was imposed). o Compared with 2016, 2017 collections have decreased by $200,150 or 9.67%. Unlike tax revenues collected by the State and remitted monthly, these taxes are paid to the City directly by the service provider. Consequently there is not a "clean cutoff' in terms of when a vendor pays the tax. Tax revenues currently reported for December include those that were received through January 31St o Tax receipts peaked in 2009 at $3,054,473 and have decreased each year since due to what we suspect is the reduction in land lines by individual households. o The 2017 Budgeted revenues were amended down by $200,000 to $2,000,000, and it appears that actual receipts will come in at approximately $1.9 million. o The City has hired a consultant to perform an audit of providers who pay the telephone utility tax. The audit will assess whether providers are accurately remitting all taxes owed to the City, and the consultant will be paid on a contingent basis out of revenues recovered from the telephone providers. Two audits have been completed, with one more expected to be completed in early 2018. The City thus far has received payments in the amount of $185,194 which is comprised of recovered revenue plus interest and penalty fees. Per the contract with the consultant, the City paid $46,299 or 25% of the amount recovered. P:IFinancelFinance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports1201812018 01 31 - 2017 12 PRELIMINARY No 2.docx Page 4 P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2018\2018 01 31 - 2017 12 PRELIMINARY No 2 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures For the Twelve -Month Period Ended December 31, 2017 #001 - GENERAL FUND RECURRING ACTIVITY Budget Year Elapsed = 2017 100.00% 2017 Budget Actual Actual through Budget December December 31 Remaining % of Budget Revenues Property Tax 11,614,500 577,163 11,613,056 (1,444) 99.99% Sales Tax 19,852,100 3,625,806 21,089,134 1,237,034 106.23% Sales Tax - Public Safety 919,000 165,334 983,025 64,025 106.97% Sales Tax - Criminal Justice 1,669,000 295,846 1,765,040 96,040 105.75% Gambling Tax and Leasehold Excise Tax 341,500 2,349 292,777 (48,723) 85.73% Franchise Fees/Business Registration 1,200,000 12,711 988,851 (211,149) 82.40% State Shared Revenues 2,104,600 610,610 2,383,510 278,910 113.25% Fines, Forfeitures and Penalties 1,361,000 129,837 890,830 (470,170) 65.45% Community Development 1,449,300 119,670 2,219,671 770,371 153.15% Recreation Program Fees 640,900 29,607 711,489 70,589 111.01% Miscellaneous Department Revenue 94,000 13,727 141,162 47,162 150.17% Miscellaneous & Investment Interest 133,500 97,560 440,559 307,059 330.01 % Transfer -in - #101 (street admin) 39,700 3,308 39,700 0 100.00% Transfer -in - #105 (h/m tax -CP advertising) 30,000 0 0 (30,000) 0.00% Transfer -in - #402 (storm admin) 13,400 1,117 13,400 0 100.00% Total Recurring Revenues 41,462,500 5,684,646 43,572,204 2,109,704 105.09% Expenditures City Council 542,872 37,452 408,119 134,753 75.18% City Manager 724,435 52,844 611,215 113,220 84.37% Legal 515,994 47,735 480,721 35,273 93.16% Public Safety 24,950,372 2,205,859 22,684,684 2,265,688 90.92% Deputy City Manager 752,277 66,216 693,011 59,266 92.12% Finance/IT 1,282,460 107,632 1,233,387 49,073 96.17% Human Resources 262,417 20,998 252,543 9,874 96.24% Public Works 921,632 87,975 758,727 162,905 82.32% City Hall Operations and Maintenance 303,918 77,395 88,545 215,373 29.13% Community Development - Administration 228,462 7,350 90,980 137,482 39.82% Community Development - Econ Dev 692,832 116,353 671,955 20,877 96.99% Community Development- Dev Svc 1,433,384 110,313 1,124,093 309,291 78.42% Community Development - Building 1,481,734 94,861 1,182,360 299,374 79.80% Parks & Rec - Administration 296,764 25,450 289,243 7,521 97.47% Parks & Rec - Maintenance 861,350 129,262 846,733 14,617 98.30% Parks & Rec - Recreation 246,295 10,028 163,317 82,978 66.31 % Parks & Rec- Aquatics 497,350 48,541 471,815 25,535 94.87% Parks & Rec - Senior Center 95,916 7,507 90,275 5,641 94.12% Parks & Rec - CenterPlace 901,958 116,498 868,234 33,724 96.26% General Government 1,240,850 220,376 958,557 282,293 77.25% Transfers out - #204 ('16 LTGO bond debt service) 430,630 33,113 397,350 33,280 92.27% Transfers out - #309 (park capital projects) 160,000 13,333 160,000 0 100.00% Transfers out - #311 (Pavement Preservation) 953,200 79,433 953,200 0 100.00% Transfers out - #501 36,600 3,050 36,600 0 100.00% Transfers out - #502 (insurance premium) 350,000 29,167 350,000 0 100.00% Total Recurring Expenditures 40,163,702 3,748,742 35,865,664 4,298,038 89.30% Recurring Revenues Over (Under) Recurring Expenditures 1,298,798 1,935,904 7,706,540 6,407,742 Page 5 P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2018\2018 01 31 - 2017 12 PRELIMINARY No 2 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures For the Twelve -Month Period Ended December 31, 2017 #001 - GENERAL FUND - continued NONRECURRING ACTIVITY Budget Year Elapsed = 2017 100.00% 2017 Budget Actual Actual through Budget December December 31 Remaining % of Budget Revenues Transfers in - #106 (Repymt of Solid Waste) 40,425 3,369 40,425 0 100.00% Transfers in - #310 (Lease in excess of bond pymt) 498,500 48,875 498,500 0 100.00% Transfer -in - #501 77,000 0 0 (77,000) 0.00% FEMA Grant Proceeds 0 0 22,869 22,869 0.00% Grant Proceeds - Dept of Commerce 114,200 0 114,200 0 100.00% Miscellaneous (donation) 35,000 0 34,723 (277) 99.21 % Total Nonrecurring Revenues 765,125 52,244 710,717 (54,408) 92.89% Expenditures General Government - IT capital replacements 177,000 20,501 137,837 39,163 77.87% City Hall lease payment (2017 final year) 513,100 0 438,565 74,535 85.47% Police Department - CAD/RMS 145,000 0 106,166 38,834 73.22% Community & Econ Dev (retail recruitment) 50,000 30,000 30,000 20,000 60.00% Com & Econ Dev (NE Industrial Area PAO) 114,200 0 114,200 0 100.00% Parks & Rec (Browns Park water lines) 30,000 0 12,230 17,770 40.77% Parks & Rec (pool drain pipe & gutter line repairs) 12,000 0 0 12,000 0.00% Parks & Rec (replace Great Room audio/visual) 345,000 307,534 307,733 37,267 89.20% Parks & Rec (parks equipment- donation) 35,000 28,322 28,322 6,678 80.92% Parks & Rec (replace carpet at CenterPlace) 24,750 0 16,061 8,689 64.89% Transfers out - #122 258,000 0 258,000 0 100.00% Transfers out - #312 3,003,929 0 3,003,929 0 100.00% Transfers out - #314 (Pines Underpass design) 1,200,000 0 1,200,000 0 100.00% Total Nonrecurring Expenditures 5,907,979 386,357 5,653,043 254,936 95.68% Nonrecurring Revenues Over (Under) Nonrecurring Expenditures (5,142,854) (334,113) (4,942,326) 200,528 Excess (Deficit) of Total Revenues Over (Under) Total Expenditures (3,844,056) 1,601,790 2,764,214 6,608,270 Beginning fund balance 29,073,972 29,073,972 Ending fund balance 25,229,916 31,838,186 Page 6 P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2018\2018 01 31 - 2017 12 PRELIMINARY No 2 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures For the Twelve -Month Period Ended December 31, 2017 SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS #101 - STREET FUND RECURRING ACTIVITY Budget Year Elapsed = 2017 100.00% 2017 Budget Actual Actual through Budget December December 31 Remaining % of Budget Revenues Telephone Utility Tax 2,000,000 151,208 1,715,958 (284,042) 85.80% Motor Vehicle Fuel (Gas) Tax 2,040,300 347,645 2,032,175 (8,126) 99.60% Multimodal Transportation 98,868 33,722 98,994 126 100.13% Right -of -Way Maintenance Fee 50,000 0 71,112 21,112 142.22% Investment Interest 4,000 1,533 7,843 3,843 196.07% Miscellaneous Revenue 10,000 0 0 (10,000) 0.00% Total Recurring Revenues 4,203,168 534,108 3,926,081 (277,087) 93.41% Expenditures Wages / Benefits / Payroll Taxes 754,872 95,217 813,960 (59,088) 107.83% Supplies 105,000 6,190 98,747 6,253 94.04% Services & Charges 2,168,151 328,581 2,075,797 92,354 95.74% Snow Operations 468,000 (164,648) 635,631 (167,631) 135.82% Intergovernmental Payments 795,000 157,572 758,327 36,673 95.39% Interfund Transfers -out - #001 39,700 3,308 39,700 0 100.00% Interfund Transfers -out - #501 (non -plow vehicle rei 23,250 8,432 23,250 0 100.00% Interfund Transfers -out - #501 (plow replace.) 77,929 0 77,929 0 100.00% Interfund Transfers -out - #311 (pavement preserval 67,342 5,612 67,342 0 100.00% Signal Detection Replacement Program 40,000 0 49,702 (9,702) 124.25% Total Recurring Expenditures 4,539,244 440,264 4,640,385 (101,141) 102.23% Recurring Revenues Over (Under) Recurring Expenditures (336,076) 93,845 (714,304) (378,228) NONRECURRING ACTIVITY Revenues Grants 0 0 1,341 1,341 0.00% Insurance proceeds (traffic signal cabinet) 0 1,743 85,074 85,074 0.00% Utility tax recovery 0 41,984 105,318 105,318 0.00% Interest & penalties on utility taxes 0 23,883 49,412 49,412 0.00% Total Nonrecurring Revenues 0 67,611 241,145 241,145 0.00% Expenditures Durable striping at Trent & Argonne 75,000 0 0 75,000 0.00% Spare traffic signal equipment 30,000 610 15,579 14,421 51.93% Battery backups for intersections 15,000 0 0 15,000 0.00% Total Nonrecurring Expenditures 120,000 610 15,579 104,421 12.98% Nonrecurring Revenues Over (Under) Nonrecurring Expenditures (120,000) 67,000 225,566 345,566 Excess (Deficit) of Total Revenues Over (Under) Total Expenditures (456,076) 160,845 (488,738) (32,662) Beginning fund balance 1,318,504 1,318,504 Ending fund balance 862,428 829,766 Page 7 P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2018\2018 01 31 - 2017 12 PRELIMINARY No 2 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures For the Twelve -Month Period Ended December 31, 2017 SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS - continued #103 - PATHS & TRAILS Revenues Motor Vehicle Fuel (Gas) Tax Investment Interest Total revenues Expenditures Capital Outlay Total expenditures Revenues over (under) expenditures Beginning fund balance Ending fund balance Budget Year Elapsed = 2017 100.00% 2017 Budget Actual Actual through Budget December December 31 Remaining % of Budget 8,600 1,466 8,571 (29) 99.66% 0 87 370 370 0.00% 8,600 1,553 8,941 341 103.96% 0 0 0 0 0.00% 0 0 0 0 0.00% 8,600 1,553 8,941 341 37,384 37,384 45,984 46,324 #104 - TOURISM FACILITIES HOTEL/MOTEL TAX FUND Revenues Tourism Facilities Hotel/Motel Tax 377,000 54,776 400,509 23,509 106.24% Investment Interest 0 1,813 6,854 6,854 0.00% Interfund Transfer -in - #105 250,000 0 0 (250,000) 0.00% Total revenues Expenditures Capital Expenditures Total expenditures Revenues over (under) expenditures Beginning fund balance Ending fund balance #105 - HOTEL / MOTEL TAX FUND Revenues Hotel/Motel Tax Investment Interest 627,000 56,588 407,363 (219,637) 64.97% 0 0 0 0 0.00% 0 0 0 0 0.00% 627,000 56,588 407,363 (219,637) 571,232 571,232 1,198,232 978,595 580,000 84,270 615,981 35,981 106.20% 500 937 3,549 3,049 709.76% Total revenues 580,500 85,207 619,529 39,029 106.72% Expenditures Interfund Transfers - #001 30,000 0 0 30,000 0.00% Interfund Transfers - #104 250,000 0 0 250,000 0.00% Tourism Promotion 354,000 137,267 351,674 2,326 99.34% Total expenditures 634,000 Revenues over (under) expenditures Beginning fund balance Ending fund balance 137,267 351,674 282,326 55.47% (53,500) (52,060) 267,855 219,790 219,790 166,290 487,645 Page 8 (243,296) P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2018\2018 01 31 - 2017 12 PRELIMINARY No 2 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures For the Twelve -Month Period Ended December 31, 2017 SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS - continued Budget Year Elapsed = 2017 100.00% 2017 Budget Actual Actual through Budget December December 31 Remaining % of Budget #106 - SOLID WASTE Revenues Sunshine Administrative Fee 125,000 96,250 237,550 (112,550) 190.04% Investment Interest 0 495 1,335 (1,335) 0.00% Grant Proceeds 26,800 0 59,389 (32,589) 221.60% Total revenues 151,800 96,745 298,274 (146,474) 196.49% Expenditures Interfund Transfers - #001 Education & Contract Administration Total expenditures Revenues over (under) expenditures Beginning fund balance Ending fund balance #107 - PEG FUND Revenues Comcast PEG Contribution Investment Interest 40,425 3,369 40,425 0 100.00% 111,375 4,562 81,288 30,087 72.99% 151,800 0 79,122 7,930 88,814 121,713 176,560 79,122 30,087 80.18% 79,122 255,682 (176,560) 80,000 0 59,378 20,622 74.22% 0 141 1,676 (1,676) 0.00% Total revenues 80,000 141 61,054 18,946 76.32% Expenditures PEG COSV Broadcast Capital Outlay 12,500 0 209 12,291 1.68% New City Hall Council Chambers 250,000 0 237,243 12,757 94.90% Total expenditures 262,500 0 237,452 25,048 90.46% Revenues over (under) expenditures (182,500) 141 (176,399) (6,101) Beginning fund balance 240,341 240,341 Ending fund balance 57,841 63,942 #120 - CENTER PLACE OPERATING RESERVE FUND Revenues Investment Interest Interfund Transfer 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% 0 0 0 0.00% Total revenues 0 0 0 0 0.00% Expenditures Operations Total expenditures 0 0 0 0 0.00% 0 0 0 0 0.00% Revenues over (under) expenditures 0 0 0 0 Beginning fund balance 300,000 300,000 Ending fund balance 300,000 300,000 Page 9 P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2018\2018 01 31 - 2017 12 PRELIMINARY No 2 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures For the Twelve -Month Period Ended December 31, 2017 SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS - continued Budget Year Elapsed = 2017 100.00% 2017 Budget Actual Actual through Budget December December 31 Remaining % of Budget #121 - SERVICE LEVEL STABILIZATION RESERVE FUND Revenues Investment Interest 21,900 0 16,575 (5,325) 75.68% Interfund Transfer 0 0 0 0 0.00% Total revenues Expenditures Operations Total expenditures 21,900 0 16,575 (5,325) 75.68% 0 0 0 0 0.00% 0 0 0 0 0.00% Revenues over (under) expenditures 21,900 0 16,575 (5,325) Beginning fund balance 5,483,425 5,483,425 Ending fund balance 5,505,325 5,500,000 #122 - WINTER WEATHER RESERVE FUND Revenues Investment Interest 600 958 3,712 3,112 618.68% Interfund Transfer -in - #001 258,000 0 258,000 0 100.00% Grant Reimbursement for Windstorm Cleanup 0 0 3,170 3,170 0.00% Subtotal revenues 258,600 958 264,882 6,282 102.43% Expenditures Snow removal expenses 500,000 500,000 500,000 0 100.00% Total expenditures 500,000 500,000 500,000 0 100.00% Revenues over (under) expenditures (241,400) (499,042) (235,118) 6,282 Beginning fund balance 242,835 242,835 Ending fund balance 1,435 7,717 Page 10 P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2018\2018 01 31 - 2017 12 PRELIMINARY No 2 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures For the Twelve -Month Period Ended December 31, 2017 DEBT SERVICE FUNDS #204 - DEBT SERVICE FUND Revenues Spokane Public Facilities District Interfund Transfer -in - #001 Interfund Transfer -in - #301 Interfund Transfer -in - #302 Total revenues Budget Year Elapsed = 2017 100.00% 2017 Budget Actual Actual through Budget December December 31 Remaining % of Budget 379,750 0 379,750 0 100.00% 430,630 33,113 397,350 (33,280) 92.27% 103,511 6,619 79,426 (24,085) 76.73% 103,510 6,619 79,425 (24,085) 76.73% 1,017,401 46,350 935,951 (81,450) 91.99% Expenditures Debt Service Payments - CenterPlace 382,867 0 379,750 3,117 99.19% Debt Service Payments - Roads 162,900 0 162,900 0 100.00% Debt Service Payments -'16 LTGO Bond 397,350 0 397,350 0 100.00% Total expenditures 943,117 0 940,000 Revenues over (under) expenditures 74,284 46,350 (4,049) Beginning fund balance (74,284) (74,284) Ending fund balance (0) (78,333) Page 11 3,117 99.67% (84,567) P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2018\2018 01 31 - 2017 12 PRELIMINARY No 2 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures For the Twelve -Month Period Ended December 31, 2017 CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS #301 - CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND Revenues REET 1 - Taxes Investment Interest Total revenues Budget Year Elapsed = 2017 100.00% 2017 Budget Actual Actual through Budget December December 31 Remaining % of Budget 1,000,000 254,398 1,503,787 503,787 150.38% 1,700 5,408 21,599 19,899 1270.54% 1,001,700 259,806 1,525,386 523,686 152.28% Expenditures Interfund Transfer -out - #204 103,511 6,619 79,426 24,085 76.73% Interfund Transfer -out - #303 437,002 2,025 196,325 240,677 44.93% Interfund Transfer -out - #311 (pavement preserve 660,479 0 0 660,479 0.00% Interfund Transfer -out - #314 50,000 1,483 19,165 30,835 38.33% Total expenditures 1,250,992 10,126 294,916 956,076 23.57% Revenues over (under) expenditures (249,292) 249,680 1,230,470 (432,390) Beginning fund balance 1,746,393 1,746,393 Ending fund balance 1,497,101 2,976,862 #302 - SPECIAL CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND Revenues REET 2 - Taxes Investment Interest 1,000,000 254,398 1,503,787 503,787 150.38% 1,700 6,259 25,594 23,894 1505.54% Total revenues 1,001,700 260,657 1,529,381 527,681 152.68% Expenditures Interfund Transfer -out - #204 103,510 6,619 79,425 24,085 76.73% Interfund Transfer -out -#303 1,173,230 (13,323) 309,062 864,168 26.34% Interfund Transfer -out - #311 (pavement preserve 660,479 0 0 660,479 0.00% Total expenditures 1,937,219 (6,704) 388,487 1,548,732 20.05% Revenues over (under) expenditures (935,519) 267,361 1,140,894 (1,021,051) Beginning fund balance 2,300,560 2,300,560 Ending fund balance 1,365,041 3,441,454 Page 12 P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2018\2018 01 31 - 2017 12 PRELIMINARY No 2 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures For the Twelve -Month Period Ended December 31, 2017 CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS - continued Budget Year Elapsed = 2017 100.00% 2017 Budget Actual Actual through Budget December December 31 Remaining % of Budget #303 STREET CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND Revenues Grant Proceeds 4,286,300 456,512 3,549,768 (736,532) 82.82% Developer Contribution 970,966 0 62,244 (908,722) 6.41 % Transfer -in - #301 437,002 2,025 196,325 (240,677) 44.93% Transfer -in -#302 1,173,230 (13,323) 309,062 (864,168) 26.34% Transfer -in - #312 8th & Carnahan Intersct 238,320 0 217,145 (21,175) 91.11% Transfer -in - #312 Euclid Ave Reconst 1,773,671 0 834,971 (938,700) 47.08% Transfer -in - #312 Sullivan Rd W Bridge 450,000 14,491 (114,582) (564,582) -25.46% Total revenues 9,329,489 459,705 5,054,933 (4,274,556) 54.18% Expenditures 123 Mission Ave -Flora to Barker 500,000 47,060 250,119 249,881 50.02% 141 Sullivan & Euclid PCC 2,150,000 5,348 1,512,193 637,807 70.33% 142 Broadway @ Argonne/Mullan 193,000 2,703 3,702 189,298 1.92% 155 Sullivan Rd W Bridge Replacement 1,063,370 72,346 722,384 340,986 67.93% 166 Pines Rd. (SR27) & Grace Ave. Int. Safety 333,224 10,359 60,574 272,650 18.18% 167 Citywide Safety Improvements 5,000 0 3,055 1,945 61.10% 201 ITS Infill Project Phase 1 (PE Start 2014) 300,000 0 7,006 292,994 2.34% 205 Sprague/Barker Intersection Improvement 40,097 0 0 40,097 0.00% 207 Indiana & Evergreen Transit Access Imp 5,000 0 0 5,000 0.00% 211 Sullivan Trent to Wellesley 0 0 (17,811) 17,811 0.00% 221 McDonald Rd Diet (16th to Mission) 5,000 0 675 4,325 13.50% 222 Citywide Reflective Signal Backplates 36,000 37,970 38,355 (2,355) 106.54% 229 32nd Ave Preservation 2,500 0 0 2,500 0.00% 234 Seth Woodard Sidewalk Improvements 5,000 0 0 5,000 0.00% 238 Pines RD Mirabeau Parkway Intersection 5,000 0 (21) 5,021 -0.41% 239 Bowdish Rd & 12th Ave. Sidewalk 471,342 0 389,898 81,444 82.72% 247 8th & Carnahan Intersection Improvments 45,320 0 218,299 (172,979) 481.68% 249 Sullivan & Wellesley Intersection 198,000 418 15,112 182,888 7.63% 250 9th Ave Sidewalk 1,750,000 0 181,053 1,568,947 10.35% 251 Euclid Ave Reconstruction Project 1,111,150 677,835 2,591,331 (1,480,181) 233.21% 258 32nd Ave Sidewalk-SR27 to Evergreen 0 10,360 32,157 (32,157) 0.00% 259 North Sullivan ITS Project 110,486 33,208 96,567 13,919 87.40% 263 Citywide Signal Backplates 0 0 143 (143) 0.00% 264 8th Ave Sidewalk - Dicky to Theirman 0 10,423 11,606 (11,606) 0.00% 265 Wellesley Sidewalk Project 0 12,433 20,727 (20,727) 0.00% Contingency 1,000,000 0 0 1,000,000 0.00% Total expenditures 9,329,489 920,461 6,137,124 3,192,365 Revenues over (under) expenditures 0 (460,756) (1,082,191) (7,466,921) Beginning fund balance 75,566 75,566 Ending fund balance 75,566 (1,006,624) Note: Work performed in the Street Capital Projects Fund for preservation projects is for items such as sidewalk upgrades that were bid with the pavement preservation work. Page 13 65.78% P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2018\2018 01 31 - 2017 12 PRELIMINARY No 2 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures For the Twelve -Month Period Ended December 31, 2017 CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS - continued Budget Year Elapsed = 2017 100.00% 2017 Budget Actual Actual through Budget December December 31 Remaining % of Budget #309 - PARKS CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND Revenues Grant Proceeds 1,863,267 4,638 1,657,548 (205,719) 88.96% Interfund Transfer -in - #001 160,000 13,333 160,000 0 100.00% Interfund Transfer -in -#312 (Appleway Trail) 298,215 0 246,559 (51,656) 82.68% Investment Interest 800 75 215 (585) 26.92% Total revenues 2,322,282 18,047 2,064,322 (257,960) 88.89% Expenditures 227 Appleway Trail - Pines to Evergreen 1,927,557 3,161 1,816,928 110,629 94.26% 237 Appleway Trail - Sullivan to Corbin 236,225 16,600 129,986 106,239 55.03% 242 Browns Park Splashpad 500 10,744 11,222 (10,722) 2244.30% 261 Edgecliff Park Splashpad 125,000 0 122,577 2,423 98.06% Total expenditures 2,289,282 30,506 2,080,712 Revenues over (under) expenditures 33,000 (12,459) (16,390) Beginning fund balance 111,714 111,714 Ending fund balance 144,714 95,324 #310 - CIVIC FACILITIES CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND Revenues Investment Interest 7,500 208,570 90.89% 1,695 9,029 (466,530) 1,529 120.39% Total revenues 7,500 Expenditures Transfers out - #001 (Lease pymt in excess of bond) Total expenditures Revenues over (under) expenditures Beginning fund balance Ending fund balance 1,695 9,029 1,529 120.39% 498,500 48,875 498,500 0 100.00% 498,500 (491,000) 1,333,159 48,875 498,500 0 100.00% (47,180) (489,471) 1,529 1,333,159 842,159 843,688 Note: The fund balance includes $839,285.10 paid by the Library District for 2.82 acres at the Balfour Park site. If the District does not succeed in getting a voted bond approved by October 2017 then the City may repurchase this land at the original sale price of $839,285.10. Page 14 P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2018\2018 01 31 - 2017 12 PRELIMINARY No 2 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures For the Twelve -Month Period Ended December 31, 2017 CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS - continued Budget Year Elapsed = 2017 100.00% 2017 Budget Actual Actual through Budget December December 31 Remaining % of Budget #311 - PAVEMENT PRESERVATION FUND Revenues Interfund Transfers in- #001 953,200 79,433 953,200 0 100.00% Interfund Transfers in- #101 67,342 5,612 67,342 0 100.00% Interfund Transfers in- #301 660,479 0 0 (660,479) 0.00% Interfund Transfers in- #302 660,479 0 0 (660,479) 0.00% Grant Proceeds 340,800 1,998 84,711 (256,089) 24.86% Investment Interest 0 3,759 20,536 20,536 0.00% Total revenues 2,682,300 90,801 1,125,789 (1,556,511) 41.97% Expenditures Pre -Project GeoTech Services 50,000 0 0 50,000 0.00% Pavement Preservation 3,000,000 0 0 3,000,000 0.00% 211 Sullivan Trent to Wellesley 0 0 (43,720) 43,720 0.00% 221 McDonald Road Diet 0 0 3,087 (3,087) 0.00% 226 Appleway Resurfacing Park to Dishman 0 0 172 (172) 0.00% 229 32nd Ave Preservation Project 0 0 43 (43) 0.00% 235 NB Sullivan Rd Pres (Spo Rvr-Flora Pit) 0 0 8,894 (8,894) 0.00% 239 Bowdish Rd & 12th Ave. Sidewalk 0 0 23,669 (23,669) 0.00% 240 Saltese Road Preservation 0 14,596 865,886 (865,886) 0.00% 248 Sprague Street Pres - Sullivan to Corbin 0 18,538 88,327 (88,327) 0.00% 252 Argonne Resurfacing: Broadway to Indiana 0 7,673 31,897 (31,897) 0.00% 253 Mission - Pines to McDonald 0 2,778 493,478 (493,478) 0.00% 254 Mission - McDonald to Evergreen 0 0 23,674 (23,674) 0.00% 255 Indiana Street Preservation 0 0 513,562 (513,562) 0.00% 256 University Rd Pres -24th to Dishman 0 0 29,666 (29,666) 0.00% 257 University Rd Pres -16th to 24th 0 0 11,574 (11,574) 0.00% Total expenditures 3,050,000 43,585 2,050,210 999,790 67.22% Revenues over (under) expenditures (367,700) 47,216 (924,421) (2,556,301) Beginning fund balance 2,953,564 2,953,564 Ending fund balance 2,585,864 2,029,143 #312 - CAPITAL RESERVE FUND Revenues Transfers in - #001 Investment Interest 3,003,929 0 3,003,929 0 100.00% 1,000 11,694 52,170 51,170 5216.96% Total revenues 3,004,929 11,694 3,056,099 51,170 101.70% Expenditures 215 City Hall Sculpture Siting 38,526 0 41,376 (2,850) 107.40% Transfers out - #303 2,461,991 14,491 937,533 1,524,458 38.08% Transfers out - #309 298,215 0 246,559 51,656 82.68% Transfers out - #314 483,000 0 0 483,000 0.00% Total expenditures 3,281,732 14,491 1,225,468 2,056,264 37.34% Revenues over (under) expenditures (276,803) (2,796) 1,830,630 (2,005,094) Beginning fund balance 4,310,362 4,310,362 Ending fund balance 4,033,559 6,140,993 Page 15 P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2018\2018 01 31 - 2017 12 PRELIMINARY No 2 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures For the Twelve -Month Period Ended December 31, 2017 CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS - continued #313 - CITY HALL CONSTRUCTION FUND Revenues Investment Interest Total revenues Expenditures Capital Outlay - City Hall Total expenditures Budget Year Elapsed = 2017 100.00% 2017 Budget Actual Actual through Budget December December 31 Remaining % of Budget 27,000 1,156 18,894 8,106 69.98% 27,000 1,156 18,894 8,106 69.98% 6,100,101 23,785 6,065,879 34,222 99.44% 6,100,101 23,785 Revenues over (under) expenditures (6,073,101) (22,629) Beginning fund balance 6,148,061 Ending fund balance 74,960 101,076 6,065,879 34,222 99.44% (6,046,985) (26,116) 6,148, 061 #314 - RAILROAD GRADE SEPARATION PROJECTS FUND Revenues Interfund Transfers in - #001 (Pines underpass des 1,200,000 0 1,200,000 0 100.00% Interfund Transfers in - #301 (Barker overpass desi 50,000 1,483 19,165 30,835 38.33% Interfund Transfers in - #312 483,000 0 0 483,000 0.00% Grant Proceeds 300,000 0 87,611 212,389 29.20% Investment Interest 0 979 4,072 (4,072) 0.00% Total revenues 2,033,000 Expenditures 143 Barker Rd/BNSF Grade Separation 223 Pines Rd Underpass Total expenditures Revenues over (under) expenditures Beginning fund balance Ending fund balance 2,462 1,310,847 722,153 64.48% 500,000 483,000 86,297 199,552 50,651 617,484 300,448 (134,484) 39.91 % 127.84% 983,000 1,050,000 0 136,947 (134,486) 817,036 493,811 0 165,964 83.12% 1,050,000 493,811 Page 16 556,189 P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2018\2018 01 31 - 2017 12 PRELIMINARY No 2 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures For the Twelve -Month Period Ended December 31, 2017 ENTERPRISE FUNDS #402 - STORMWATER FUND RECURRING ACTIVITY Revenues Stormwater Management Fees Investment Interest Budget Year Elapsed = 2017 100.00% 2017 Budget Actual Actual through Budget December December 31 Remaining % of Budget 1,860,000 107,107 1,895,033 35,033 101.88% 2,500 4,672 20,564 18,064 822.57% Total Recurring Revenues 1,862,500 111,780 1,915,597 53,097 102.85% Expenditures Wages / Benefits / Payroll Taxes 551,321 47,157 465,101 86,220 84.36% Supplies 15,425 2,225 11,065 4,360 71.73% Services & Charges 1,111,076 124,493 1,000,259 110,817 90.03% Intergovernmental Payments 50,000 0 0 50,000 0.00% Vehicle Rentals - #501 12,750 1,063 12,750 0 100.00% Interfund Transfers -out - #001 13,400 1,117 13,400 0 100.00% Total Recurring Expenditures 1,753,972 Recurring Revenues Over (Under) Recurring Expenditures 108,528 NONRECURRING ACTIVITY Revenues Grant Proceeds 176,054 1,502,575 251,397 85.67% (64,274) 413,023 304,495 210,000 0 370,207 160,207 176.29% Total Nonrecurring Revenues 210,000 0 370,207 160,207 176.29% Expenditures Capital - various projects 450,000 103,277 189,009 260,992 42.00% 166 Pines Rd. (SR27) & Grace Ave. Int Safety 0 0 0 0 0.00% 193 Effectiveness Study 210,000 0 196,480 13,520 93.56% 211 Sullivan Trent to Wellesley 0 0 (13,504) 13,504 0.00% 239 Bowdish Rd & 12th Ave. Sidewalkd 0 0 65,372 (65,372) 0.00% 240 Saltese Road Preservation Project 0 0 72,918 (72,918) 0.00% 250 9th Ave Sidewalk - Raymond to University 0 0 1,188 (1,188) 0.00% Watershed Studies 50,000 0 0 50,000 0.00% Total Nonrecurring Expenditures 710,000 Nonrecurring Revenues Over (Under) Nonrecurring Expenditures 103,277 511,463 198,537 72.04% (500,000) (103,277) (141,255) 358,745 Excess (Deficit) of Total Revenues Over (Under) Total Expenditures (391,472) (167,551) 271,767 663,239 Beginning working capital 1,773,103 1,773,103 Ending working capital 1,381,631 2,044,870 Note: Work performed in the Stormwater Fund for preservation projects is for stormwater improvements that were bid with the pavement preservation work. #403 - AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA Revenues Spokane County 460,000 0 452,110 (7,890) 98.28% Grant Proceeds 0 0 58,722 58,722 0.00% Investment Interest 0 2,684 10,238 10,238 0.00% Total revenues 460,000 Expenditures Capital - various projects 530,000 Total expenditures Revenues over (under) expenditures Beginning working capital Ending working capital 2,684 521,070 61,070 113.28% 0 58,722 471,278 11.08% 530,000 0 58,722 471,278 11.08% (70,000) 950,725 2,684 462,348 950,725 880,725 1,413,073 Page 17 (410,209) P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2018\2018 01 31 - 2017 12 PRELIMINARY No 2 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures For the Twelve -Month Period Ended December 31, 2017 INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS Budget Year Elapsed = 2017 100.00% 2017 Budget Actual Actual through Budget December December 31 Remaining % of Budget #501 - ER&R FUND Revenues Interfund vehicle lease - #001 32,500 2,708 32,500 0 100.00% Interfund vehicle lease - #101 23,250 1,938 23,250 0 100.00% Interfund vehicle lease (plow replace) 77,929 6,494 77,929 0 100.00% Interfund vehicle lease - #402 12,750 1,063 12,750 0 100.00% Transfer in - #001 (CenterPlace kitchen reserve) 36,600 3,050 36,600 0 100.00% Investment Interest 2,000 2,200 9,651 7,651 482.56% Total revenues 185,029 17,452 192,680 7,651 104.14% Expenditures Small tools and minor equipment 6,400 0 6,898 (498) 107.78% Snow Plow Replacement 122,400 0 121,707 693 99.43% Snow Plow Blades 28,000 0 27,744 256 99.09% Interfund Transfers -out - #001 77,000 0 0 77,000 0.00% Total expenditures 233,800 0 156,349 77,451 66.87% Revenues over (under) expenditures (48,771) 17,452 36,332 (69,800) Beginning working capital 1,136,951 1,136,951 Ending working capital 1,088,180 1,173,283 #502 - RISK MANAGEMENT FUND Revenues Investment Interest Interfund Transfer - #001 0 422 1,107 1,107 0.00% 350,000 29,167 350,000 0 100.00% Total revenues 350,000 Expenditures Auto & Property Insurance Unemployment Claims Miscellaneous Total expenditures Revenues over (under) expenditures Beginning working capital Ending working capital 29,589 351,107 1,107 100.32% 350,000 0 311,467 38,533 88.99% 0 7,105 29,067 (29,067) 0.00% 0 0 0 0 0.00% 350,000 7,105 340,534 9,466 97.30% 0 233,688 233,688 22,484 10,574 233,688 244,261 (8,359) SUMMARY FOR ALL FUNDS Total of Revenues for all Funds 73,654,023 7,893,678 70,108,055 Per Revenue Status Report 73,654,023 7,893,678 70,108,055 Difference - - - Total of Expenditures for all Funds Per Expenditure Status Report 85,520,429 85,520,429 6,729,678 6,729,678 70,453,484 70,453,484 Total Capital expenditures (included in total expenditures) 24,037,298 1,615,528 18,610,513 Page 18 P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2018\2018 01 31 - 2017 12 PRELIMINARY No 2 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Investment Report For the Twelve -Month Period Ended December 31, 2017 2/12/2018 LGI P" BB CD UMPQUA CD Total Investments Beginning $ 51,621,209.64 $ 3,013,269.07 $ 2,005,002.70 $ 57,933,562.68 Deposits 2,677,725.13 0.00 0.00 2,677,725.13 Withdrawls (5,100,000.00) 0.00 0.00 (5,100,000.00) Interest 115,413.47 9,766.29 6,892.21 132,071.97 Jan'18 Accrued Interest Receivable (59,662.66) 0.00 0.00 (59,662.66) Ending $ 49,254,685.58 $ 3,023,035.36 $ 2,011,894.91 $ 54,289,615.85 001 General Fund 101 Street Fund 103 Trails & Paths 104 Tourism Facilities Hotel/Motel 105 Hotel/Motel 106 Solid Waste Fund 107 PEG Fund 120 CenterPlace Operating Reserve 121 Service Level Stabilization Reserve 122 Winter Weather Reserve 123 Civic Facilities Replacement 301 Capital Projects 302 Special Capital Projects 303 Street Capital Projects Fund 309 Parks Capital Project 310 Civic Buildings Capital Projects 311 Pavement Preservation 312 Capital Reserve Fund 313 City Hall Construction Fund 314 Railroad Grade Separation Projects 402 Stormwater Management 403 Aquifer Protection Fund 501 Equipment Rental & Replacement 502 Risk Management "Local Government Investment Pool matures: 6/28/2018 11/15/2018 rate: 1.30 1.50% Balance Earnings Current Period Year to date Budget $ 28,745,916.32 $ 85,105.59 654, 283.64 1,533.12 37,025.03 86.76 773, 654.34 1,812.82 399,667.18 936.50 211,165.56 494.81 60, 042.79 140.69 0.00 0.00 5, 500, 000.00 0.00 408,986.46 958.34 0.00 0.00 2,308,162.15 5,408.48 2,671,115.39 6,258.95 0.00 0.00 31, 997.22 74.98 723, 507.22 1,695.32 1,604,015.38 3,758.53 4, 990, 787.16 11, 694.40 493, 341.44 1,156.00 417,697.71 978.75 1,994,013.45 4,672.37 1,145,429.83 2,683.97 938,693.81 2,199.55 180,113.77 422.04 309,825.94 $ 73,000.00 7,842.76 4,000.00 369.52 0.00 6,854.05 0.00 3,548.81 500.00 1,334.94 0.00 1,675.57 0.00 0.00 0.00 16, 574.93 21, 900.00 3,712.10 600.00 0.00 0.00 21, 599.12 1,700.00 25, 594.17 1,700.00 0.00 0.00 215.35 800.00 9,029.12 7,500.00 20, 536.14 0.00 52,169.62 1,000.00 18, 894.22 27, 000.00 4,072.02 0.00 20,564.14 2,500.00 10,238.03 0.00 9,651.16 2,000.00 1,107.34 0.00 $ 54,289,615.85 $ 132,071.97 $ 545,409.05 $ 144,200.00 Page 19 P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2018\2018 01 31 - 2017 12 PRELIMINARY No 2 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Sales Tax Receipts For the Twelve -Month Period Ended December 31, 2017 Month Received 2016 2017 2/12/2018 Difference February 2,109,906.28 2,250,071.29 140,165.01 6.64% March 1,488,699.93 1,553,546.20 64,846.27 4.36% April 1,555,221.97 1,567,402.86 12,180.89 0.78% May 1,852,586.82 1,962,909.06 110,322.24 5.96% June 1,768,797.14 1,765,547.51 (3,249.63) (0.18%) July 1,848,301.11 1,980,537.73 132,236.62 7.15% August 2,013,841.16 2,191,814.27 177,973.11 8.84% September 1,963,131.36 2,119,588.28 156,456.92 7.97% October 2,044,241.64 2,207,153.00 162,911.36 7.97% November 2,058,260.31 2,151,642.69 93,382.38 4.54% December 1,862,239.72 2,000,238.81 137,999.09 7.41% January 1,875,424.10 2,086,747.36 211,323.26 11.27% 22,440,651.54 23,837,199.06 1,396,547.52 6.22% 22,440,651.54 23,837,199.06 Sales tax receipts reported here reflect remittances for general sales tax, criminal justice sales tax and public safety tax. The sales tax rate for retail sales transacted within the boundaries of the City of Spokane Valley is 8.8%. The tax that is paid by a purchaser at the point of sale is remitted by the vendor to the Washington State Department of Revenue who then remits the taxes back to the various agencies that have imposed the tax. The allocation of the total 8.8% tax rate to the agencies is as follows: - State of Washington 6.50% - City of Spokane Valley 0.85% - Spokane County 0.15% - Spokane Public Facilities District 0.10% * - Criminal Justice 0.10% - Public Safety 0.10% * 2.30% local tax - Juvenile Jail 0.10% * - Mental Health 0.10% * - Law Enforcement Communications 0.10% * - Spokane Transit Authority 0.70% * 8.80% Indicates voter approved sales taxes In addition to the .85% reported above that the City receives, we also receive a portion of the Criminal Justice and Public Safety sales taxes. The distribution of those taxes is computed as follows: Criminal Justice: The tax is assessed county -wide and of the total collected, the State distributes 10% of the receipts to Spokane County, with the remainder allocated on a per capita basis to the County and the cities within the County. Public Safety: The tax is assessed county -wide and of the total collected, the State distributes 60% of the receipts to Spokane County, with the remainder allocated on a per capita basis to the cities within the County. Page 20 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Sales Tax Collections - December For the years 2008 through 2017 P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Tax Revenue\Sales Tax \2017\sales tax collections 2017 - December 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 January 1,729,680 February 1,129,765 March 1,219,611 April 1,423,459 May 1,243,259 June 1,386,908 July 1,519,846 August 1,377,943 September 1,364,963 October 1,344,217 November 1,292,327 December 1,129,050 1,484,350 1,098,575 1,068,811 1,134,552 1,098,054 1,151,772 1,309,401 1,212,531 1,227,813 1,236,493 1,155,647 1,070,245 1,491,059 963,749 1,018,468 1,184,137 1,102, 523 1,123, 907 1,260,873 1,211,450 1,191,558 1,269,505 1,139, 058 1,141,012 1,460,548 990,157 1,015,762 1,284,180 1,187,737 1,248,218 1,332,834 1,279,500 1,294,403 1,291,217 1,217,933 1,247,920 1,589,887 1,009,389 1,067,733 1,277,621 1,174, 962 1,290,976 1,302,706 1,299,678 1,383,123 1,358,533 1,349,580 1,323,189 1,671,269 1,133,347 1,148,486 1,358,834 1,320,449 1,389,802 1,424,243 1,465,563 1,466,148 1,439,321 1,362,021 1,408,134 1,677,887 1,170, 640 1,201,991 1,448,539 1,400,956 1,462,558 1,545,052 1,575,371 1,552,736 1,594,503 1,426,254 1,383,596 1,732,299 1,197,323 1,235,252 1,462,096 1,373,710 1,693,461 1,718,428 1,684,700 1,563,950 1,618,821 1,487,624 1,441,904 1,863,225 1,316,682 1,378,300 1,640,913 1,566,178 1,641,642 1,776,653 1,746,371 1,816,923 1,822,998 1,652,181 1,664,983 1,992,273 1,369,740 1,389,644 1,737,933 1,564,119 1,751,936 1,935,028 1,877,899 1,946,689 1,898,067 1,768,817 1,856,989 Total Collections 16,161,028 14,248,244 14,097,299 14,850,409 15,427,377 16,587,617 17,440,083 18,209,568 19,887,049 21,089,134 Budget Estimate 17,115,800 17,860,000 14,410,000 14,210,000 14,210,000 15,250,000 16,990,000 17,628,400 18,480,500 19,852,100 Actual over (under) budg (954,772) (3,611,756) (312,701) 640,409 1,217,377 1,337,617 450,083 581,168 1,406,549 1,237,034 Total actual collections as a % of total budget 94.42% 79.78% 97.83% 104.51 % 108.57% 108.77% 102.65% 103.30% 107.61 % 106.23% % change in annual total collected (7.32%) (11.84%) (1.06%) 5.34% 3.89% 7.52% 5.14% 4.41% 9.21% 6.04% Chart Reflecting History of Collections through the Month of December 25,000,000 20,000,000 15,000,000 10,000,000 5,000,000 0 December 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 1/23/2018 2017 to 2016 Difference ok 129,048 6.93% 53,058 4.03% 11,344 0.82% 97,020 5.91% (2,059) (0.13%) 110,294 6.72% 158,375 8.91% 131,528 7.53% 129,766 7.14% 75,069 4.12% 116,636 7.06% 192,006 11.53% 1,202,085 6.04% 1 1 2016 2017 • December • November • October ■ September ■ August ■ July • June • May •April Page 21 ■ P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Tax Revenue\Lodging Tax\2017\105 hotel motel tax 2017 - December CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Hotel/Motel Tax Receipts through - December Actual for the years 2008 through 2017 2008 1 2009 1 2010 1 2011 1 2012 1 2013 2014 1 2015 1 2016 1 2017 January 28,947 February 24,623 March 27,510 April 40,406 May 36,829 June 46,660 July 50,421 August 50,818 September 60,712 October 38,290 November 35,583 December 26,290 1/30/2018 2017 to 2016 Difference ok 23,280 22,707 22,212 21,442 24,185 25,425 27,092 31,887 27,210 (4,677) (14.67%) 23,284 23,417 22,792 21,549 25,975 26,014 27,111 27,773 26,795 (978) (3.52%) 25,272 24,232 24,611 25,655 27,739 29,384 32,998 34,330 31,601 (2,729) (7.95%) 36,254 39,463 38,230 52,130 40,979 48,246 50,455 52,551 52,242 (309) (0.59%) 32,589 34,683 33,791 37,478 40,560 41,123 44,283 50,230 50,112 (118) (0.24%) 40,415 39,935 41,403 43,971 47,850 52,618 56,975 55,060 60,637 5,577 10.13% 43,950 47,385 49,312 52,819 56,157 61,514 61,809 65,007 69,337 4,330 6.66% 50,147 54,923 57,452 57,229 63,816 70,384 72,697 73,700 76,972 3,272 4.44% 50,818 59,419 58,908 64,299 70,794 76,100 74,051 70,305 80,173 9,868 14.04% 36,784 41,272 39,028 43,699 43,836 45,604 49,880 55,660 56,631 971 1.74% 34,055 34,330 37,339 39,301 42,542 39,600 42,376 46,393 47,090 697 1.50% 27,131 26,777 32,523 30,432 34,238 33,256 41,510 33,478 37,180 3,702 11.06% Total Collections 467,089 423,978 448,545 457,603 490,004 518,672 549,267 581,237 596,374 615,980 19,606 3.29% Budget Estimate 400,000 512,000 380,000 480,000 430,000 490,000 530,000 550,000 580,000 580,000 Actual over (under) budg 67,089 (88,022) 68,545 (22,397) 60,004 28,672 19,267 31,237 16,374 35,980 Total actual collections as a % of total budget 116.77% 82.81 % 118.04% 95.33% 113.95% 105.85% 103.64% 105.68% 102.82% 106.20% % change in annual total collected 1.19% (9.23%) 5.79% 2.02% 7.08% 5.85% 5.90% 5.82% 2.60% 3.29% Chart Reflecting History of Collections through the Month of December 700,000 600,000 500,000 400,000 300,000 200,000 100,000 0 i • December 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 December November • October ■ September • August ■ July ■ June • May • April • March • February Page 22 P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Tax Revenue\REET\2017\301 and 302 REET for 2017 - December CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA 1st and 2nd 1/4% REET Collections through December Actual for the years 2008 through 2017 2008 1 2009 1 2010 1 2011 1 2012 1 2013 1 2014 1 2015 1 2016 1 2017 January 145,963 February 159,503 March 133,513 April 128,367 May 158,506 June 178,203 July 217,943 August 133,906 September 131,240 October 355,656 November 147,875 December 96,086 Total Collected Budget estimate Actual over (under) budget 55,281 45,181 73,307 81,156 77,464 105,021 122,530 115,830 93,862 113,961 133,265 71,366 59,887 64,122 86,204 99,507 109,625 105,680 84,834 72,630 75,812 93,256 72,021 38,725 64,128 36,443 95,880 79,681 124,692 81,579 79,629 129,472 68,020 61,396 74,753 65,077 46,359 56,115 71,730 86,537 111,627 124,976 101,049 106,517 63,517 238,095 104,886 74,300 56,898 155,226 72,172 90,377 116,165 139,112 128,921 117,150 174,070 117,806 78,324 75,429 61,192 67,049 81,724 105,448 198,870 106,676 208,199 172,536 152,323 123,505 172,227 117,682 96,141 103,508 165,868 236,521 165,748 347,421 217,375 202,525 179,849 128,833 129,870 157,919 104,446 83,583 220,637 205,654 192,806 284,897 248,899 231,200 178,046 253,038 186,434 164,180 153,661 124,514 282,724 169,060 202,734 248,768 449,654 472,420 187,348 207,895 229,800 278,995 1,986,762 2,000,000 (13,238) 1,088,222 2,000,000 (911,778) 962,304 760,000 202,304 960,751 800,000 160,751 1,185,707 950,000 235,707 1,321,650 1,000,000 321,650 1,567,429 1,200,000 367,429 2,131,578 1,600,000 531,578 2,353,822 2,000,000 353,822 3,007,573 2,000,000 1,007,573 Total actual collections as a % of total budget 99.34% 54.41% 126.62% 120.09% 124.81% 132.17% 130.62% 133.22% 117.69% 150.38% % change in annual total collected (23.28%) (45.23%) (11.57%) (0.16%) 23.41% 11.47% 18.60% 35.99% 10.43% 27.77% Chart Reflecting History of Collections through the Month of December 3,500,000 3,000,000 2,500,000 2,000,000 1,500,000 1,000,000 500,000 0 2008 2009 2010 December 2011 2012 2013 2014 1/30/2018 2017 to 2016 Difference 49,214 47.12% 40,931 48.97% 62,087 28.14% (36,594) (17.79%) 9,928 5.15% (36,129) (12.68%) 200,755 80.66% 241,220 104.33% 9,302 5.22% (45,143) (17.84%) 43,366 23.26% 114,815 69.93% 653,751 27.77% 2015 2016 2017 • December • November • October • September • August ■ July ■ June May April March Page 23 P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Debt Capacity\2017\debt capacity 2017 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Debt Capacity 2016 Assessed Value for 2017 Property Taxes 8,124,487,663 Voted (UTGO) Nonvoted (LTGO) Voted park Voted utility 1.00% of assessed value 1.50% of assessed value 2.50% of assessed value 2.50% of assessed value Maximum Outstanding Remaining Debt as of Debt ok Capacity 12/31/2017 Capacity Utilized 81,244,877 121,867,315 203,112,192 203,112,192 609, 336, 576 0 81,244,877 12, 790, 000 109, 077, 315 0 203,112,192 0 203,112,192 12,790,000 596,546,576 0.00% 10.50% 0.00% 0.00% 2.10% 2014 LTGO Bonds 12/1/2014 Bonds 12/1/2015 Repaid 12/1/2016 12/1/2017 225,000 175,000 185,000 190,000 135,000 125,000 130,000 130,000 360,000 300,000 315,000 320,000 0 0 75,000 150,000 360,000 300,000 390,000 470,000 775,000 520,000 1,295,000 \ 225,000 1,520,000 12/1/2018 230,000 135,000 365,000 155,000 520,000 12/1/2019 255,000 140,000 395,000 160,000 555,000 12/1/2020 290,000 140,000 430,000 165,000 595,000 12/1/2021 320,000 145,000 465,000 170,000 635,000 12/1/2022 350,000 150,000 500,000 175,000 675,000 12/1/2023 390,000 155,000 545,000 180,000 725,000 12/1/2024 430,000 0 430,000 185,000 615,000 12/1/2025 465,000 0 465,000 95,000 660,000 12/1/2026 505,000 0 505,000 00,000 705,000 12/1/2027 395,000 0 395,000 2 5,000 600,000 12/1/2028 300,000 0 300,000 2 5,000 515,000 12/1/2029 245,000 0 245,000 220,000 465,000 12/1/2030 225,000 0 225,000 225,000 450,000 Bonds 12/1/2031 180,000 0 180,000 235,000 415,000 Remaining 12/1/2032 130,000 0 130,000 240,000 370,000 12/1/2033 165,000 0 165,000 250,000 415,000 12/1/2034 0 0 0 260,000 260,000 12/1/2035 0 0 0 270,000 270,000 12/1/2036 0 0 0 280,000 280,000 12/1/2037 0 0 0 290,000 290,000 12/1/2038 0 0 0 305,00 305,000 12/1/2039 0 0 0 315,00 315,000 12/1/2040 0 0 0 330,000 330,000 12/1/2041 0 0 0 340,000 340,000 12/1/2042 0 0 0 355,000 355,000 12/1/2043 0 0 0 365,000 365,000 12/1/2044 0 0 0 375,000 375,000 12/1/2045 0 0 0 390,000 390,000 4,875,000 865,000 5,740,000 7,050,000 12,790,000 5,650,000 1,385,000 7,035,000 7,275,000 14,310,000 Page 24 1/5/2018 Road & LTGO Bonds Period Street 2016 LTGO Grand Ending CenterPlace Improvements Total Bonds Total 12/1/2014 Bonds 12/1/2015 Repaid 12/1/2016 12/1/2017 225,000 175,000 185,000 190,000 135,000 125,000 130,000 130,000 360,000 300,000 315,000 320,000 0 0 75,000 150,000 360,000 300,000 390,000 470,000 775,000 520,000 1,295,000 \ 225,000 1,520,000 12/1/2018 230,000 135,000 365,000 155,000 520,000 12/1/2019 255,000 140,000 395,000 160,000 555,000 12/1/2020 290,000 140,000 430,000 165,000 595,000 12/1/2021 320,000 145,000 465,000 170,000 635,000 12/1/2022 350,000 150,000 500,000 175,000 675,000 12/1/2023 390,000 155,000 545,000 180,000 725,000 12/1/2024 430,000 0 430,000 185,000 615,000 12/1/2025 465,000 0 465,000 95,000 660,000 12/1/2026 505,000 0 505,000 00,000 705,000 12/1/2027 395,000 0 395,000 2 5,000 600,000 12/1/2028 300,000 0 300,000 2 5,000 515,000 12/1/2029 245,000 0 245,000 220,000 465,000 12/1/2030 225,000 0 225,000 225,000 450,000 Bonds 12/1/2031 180,000 0 180,000 235,000 415,000 Remaining 12/1/2032 130,000 0 130,000 240,000 370,000 12/1/2033 165,000 0 165,000 250,000 415,000 12/1/2034 0 0 0 260,000 260,000 12/1/2035 0 0 0 270,000 270,000 12/1/2036 0 0 0 280,000 280,000 12/1/2037 0 0 0 290,000 290,000 12/1/2038 0 0 0 305,00 305,000 12/1/2039 0 0 0 315,00 315,000 12/1/2040 0 0 0 330,000 330,000 12/1/2041 0 0 0 340,000 340,000 12/1/2042 0 0 0 355,000 355,000 12/1/2043 0 0 0 365,000 365,000 12/1/2044 0 0 0 375,000 375,000 12/1/2045 0 0 0 390,000 390,000 4,875,000 865,000 5,740,000 7,050,000 12,790,000 5,650,000 1,385,000 7,035,000 7,275,000 14,310,000 Page 24 1/5/2018 1 1 P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Tax Revenue \MVFT\2017\motor vehicle fuel tax collections 2017 - December CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Motor Fuel (Gas) Tax Collections - December For the years 2008 through 2017 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 January 165,698 February 149,799 March 159,316 April 165,574 May 162,281 June 176,085 July 166,823 August 171,690 September 176,912 October 165,842 November 193,360 December 142,230 133,304 155,832 146,264 161,117 156,109 173,954 169,756 179,012 175,965 163,644 167,340 144,376 161,298 145,869 140,486 161,721 158,119 168,146 164,221 176,869 175,067 164,475 168,477 143,257 154,792 146,353 141,849 165,019 154,700 158,351 165,398 153,361 173,820 158,889 160,461 124,714 159,607 135,208 144,297 153,546 144,670 159,827 160,565 164,050 171,651 153,022 162,324 138,223 146,145 145,998 135,695 156,529 151,595 167,479 155,348 173,983 195,397 133,441 164,303 142,140 152,906 148,118 131,247 156,269 156,850 161,965 157,805 172,308 173,299 160,539 165,871 141,298 152,598 145,455 140,999 157,994 156,259 164,872 168,205 186,277 174,505 161,520 181,771 153,338 163,918 163,037 145,537 167,304 171,829 157,737 177,427 177,567 194,640 166,369 176,178 152,787 1/30/2018 2017 to 2016 Difference ok 150,654 (13,264) (8.09%) 164,807 1,770 1.09% 138,205 (7,332) (5.04%) 168,000 696 0.42% 174,211 2,382 1.39% 174,838 17,101 10.84% 177,019 (408) (0.23%) 195,780 18,213 10.26% 184,342 (10,298) (5.29%) 163,780 (2,589) (1.56%) 194,814 18,636 10.58% 154,298 1,511 0.99% Total Collections 1,995,610 1,926,673 1,928,005 1,857,707 1,846,990 1,868,053 1,878,475 1,943,793 2,014,330 2,040,748 Budget Estimate 2,150,000 2,050,000 1,900,000 1,875,000 1,905,800 1,868,900 1,866,400 1,867,700 2,013,400 2,048,900 Actual over (under) budg (154,390) (123,327) 28,005 (17,293) (58,810) (847) 12,075 76,093 930 (8,152) Total actual collections as a % of total budget 92.82% 93.98% 101.47% 99.08% 96.91 % 99.95% 100.65% 104.07% 100.05% 99.60% % change in annual total collected (4.95%) (3.45%) 0.07% (3.65%) (0.58%) 1.14% 0.56% 3.48% 3.63% 1.31% Chart Reflecting History of Collections through the Month 01 December 2,500,000 2,000,000 1,500,000 1,000,000 500,000 0 December ■ 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 26,418 1.31% December November October September • August • July • June • May • April Page 25 i P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Tax Revenue\Telephone Tax\2017\telephone utility tax collections 2017 - December CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Telephone Utility Tax Collections - December For the years 2009 through 2017 6 ._=, 2009 2010 1 2011 2012 1 2013 2014 1 2015 2016 1 2017 January 128,354 February 282,773 March 230,721 April 275,775 May 242,115 June 239,334 July 269,631 August 260,408 September 249,380 October 252,388 November 254,819 December 368,775 234,622 266,041 264,175 254,984 255,056 251,880 250,593 246,261 240,111 238,500 247,848 236,065 241,357 230,366 245,539 238,561 236,985 239,013 244,191 349,669 241,476 237,111 240,246 236,449 193,818 261,074 234,113 229,565 227,469 234,542 226,118 228,789 227,042 225,735 225,319 221,883 217,478 216,552 223,884 214,618 129,270 293,668 213,078 211,929 210,602 205,559 212,947 213,097 210,777 205,953 208,206 206,038 210,010 210,289 205,651 205,645 199,193 183,767 213,454 202,077 177,948 212,845 174,738 214,431 187,856 187,412 190,984 185,172 183,351 183,739 175,235 183,472 182,167 173,971 177,209 171,770 174,512 170,450 174,405 171,909 170,476 166,784 166,823 168,832 162,734 163,300 162,536 157,285 145,672 156,023 157,502 150,644 155,977 153,075 151,208 153,202 2/12/2018 2017 to 2016 Difference (19,433) (10.67%) (10,671) (6.13%) (14,673) (8.28%) (14,485) (8.43%) (28,840) (16.53%) (14,427) (8.46%) (16,903) (9.69%) (21,265) (12.37%) (14,499) (8.51%) (13,709) (8.22%) (15,615) (9.36%) (15,630) (9.26%) Total Collections 3,054,473 2,986,136 2,980,963 2,735,467 2,562,682 2,461,060 2,257,183 2,069,308 1,869,158 (200,150) (9.67%) Budget Estimate 2,500,000 2,800,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 2,900,000 2,750,000 2,565,100 2,340,000 2,000,000 Actual over (under) budg 554,473 186,136 (19,037) (264,533) (337,318) (288,940) (307,917) (270,692) (130,842) Total actual collections as a % of total budget 122.18% 106.65% 99.37% 91.18% 88.37% 89.49% 88.00% 88.43% 93.46% % change in annual total collected n/a (2.24%) (0.17%) (8.24%) (6.32%) (3.97%) (8.28%) (8.32%) (9.67%) Chart Reflecting History of Collections through the Month of December 3,500,000 3,000,000 2,500,000 2,000,000 1,500,000 1,000,000 500,000 0 December 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 • December • November • October ■ September • August ■ July ■ June • May • April ■ March ■ February • January Page 26 Mark Werner Chief of Police Spokane Valley Police Department Accredited Since 2011 Services provided in partnership with the Spokane County Sherds Office and the Community, Dedicated to Your Safety. Ozzie Knezovich Sheriff TO: Mark Calhoun, City Manager FROM: Mark Werner, Chief of Police DATE: February 19, 2018 RE: Monthly Report January 2018 In August 2016, we switched from UCR to NIBRS classification, which means we went from reporting based on a hierarchy to reporting all the crimes for each incident. Consequently, comparing crime statistics before August 2016 to crime statistics after that timeframe is not recommended using the data provided in the attached charts and graphs. ADMINISTRATIVE: Chief Werner attended the Joint Leadership Forum along with other law enforcement and fire command staff at the Fire Training Center. This is a monthly meeting to discuss joint efforts between agencies. In mid-January, a Community Leaders Luncheon was held at CenterPlace, which Chief Werner attended. The quarterly Safe Streets Task Force Meeting was held in mid-January, attended by Chief Werner and other command staff from the Spokane County Sheriff's Office. Chief Werner attended a swearing in ceremony for a new lateral transfer, Deputy Reyes, in mid- January. In late January, Chief Werner and Crime Prevention Deputy Chris Johnston attended a meeting at Valley Hospital with Sharon Rainer, a member of their Emergency Preparedness Committee, and Rick Ferraro, the chairman of their Emergency Operations Committee. They discussed getting an Active Shooter Drill Program set up for the facility, establishing training, identifying safe rooms, and Page 1 integrating their security personnel in the process. Deputy Johnston will be following up with the committee to assist with setting up the program. SHERIFF'S COMMUNITY ORIENTED POLICING EFFORT (SCOPE): In the month of January, S.C.O.P.E. participated in: • S.C.O.P.E. Basic Training • Girl Scouts Meeting Partnership • Big Brothers and Big Sisters Meetings on Partnership • Safe Kids Meeting • 2018 Washington State Crime Prevention Association conference planning meeting • Moving Forward S.C.O.P.E. Regional Meetings • East Valley Community Coalition Meeting Underage Drinking/Drug Prevention • GSSAC Coalition Meeting, and • Operation Family ID January 2018 Volunteers Hours per Station *Includes estimated volunteer service hours that are provided in the City of Spokane Valley. These two locations cover both Spokane Valley and the unincorporated portion of the county. Location # Volunteers Admin Hours L.E. Hours Total Hours Central Valley 3 25 60.5 85.5 East Valley* 26 314.5 402.5 717 Edgecliff 8 143 20 163 Trentwood 5 108 38 146 University 27 302 130 432 West Valley* 20 413 30 443 TOTALS 89 1,305.5 681 1,986.5 Volunteer Value ($30.46 per hour) $60,508.79 for January 2018 S.C.O.P.E. Incident Response Team (SIRT) volunteers contributed 46 on -scene hours (including travel time) in January, responding to crime scenes, motor vehicle accidents and providing traffic control; 6 hours were for incidents specifically in Spokane Valley. There were no special events in January. Total January volunteer hours contributed by SIRT, including training, stand-by, response and special events is 960; total for 2018 is 960. (Starting January 2018, a change is being made in how actual hours of `stand-by' time is calculated. Due to the shortage of staff necessary to cover up to 62 shifts of 24 hours per day per month, a simple formula as used in the past, no longer reflects the actual time spent on stand-by. Now, we will count each month the actual time members sign up for duty minus the time actually spent on -scene.) Abandoned Vehicles Page 2 November December January Tagged for Impounding 47 24 49 Cited/Towed 6 9 5 Hulks Processed 12 4 5 Total Vehicles Processed 116 68 118 Yearly Total of Vehicles Processed 1054 1122 118 Page 2 SCOPE DISABLED PARKING ACTIVITY REPORT City of Spokane Valley # of Vol. # of Vol. # of Hrs. # of Disabled Infractions Issued # of Warnings Issued # of Non - Disabled Infractions Issued January 0 0 0 0 0 YTD Total 0 0 0 0 0 Spokane County # of Vol. # of Hrs. # of Disabled Infractions Issued # of Warnings Issued # of Non - Disabled Infractions Issued January 1 11.5 1 11 0 YTD Total 1 11.5 1 11 0 OPERATIONS: Fleeing Suspect's Attempt to Hide No Match for K9 Gunnar's Nose - Several Spokane Valley Deputies, including Deputy Hunt and K9 Gunnar, responded to a theft where the suspect fled after she fought, bit, and threatened store employees. K9 Gunnar eventually located the 22 -year-old female suspect, who is now charged with three felonies, hiding in the closest of a home she illegally entered. In early January, at approximately 7:50 p.m., Spokane Valley Deputies responded to ShopKo, located at 13414 E. Sprague, for a report of a theft. Loss Prevention employees said a female entered the store and picked up several items, to include a prepaid cell phone and several makeup items, as she walked around. The female suspect went into a dressing room with all the items, but when she exited, she didn't have the phone or makeup. The employee checked the dressing room for the items, which were not located. The suspect then approached the checkout counter and attempted to pay for other items, but the credit card she used was declined and she left the store. The ShopKo Loss Prevention employees contacted the female suspect outside the store, identified themselves, and attempted to escort her back to the loss prevention office. The female refused and became assaultive, pushing, hitting, kicking, and even biting one of the employees. She also threatened to "mace" them and yelled she had a gun during the encounter before she fled the scene on foot. After viewing store security video, Deputy Wang recognized the female suspect and confirmed her identity by matching the video to a previous booking photo and provided the suspect's description via radio to Patrol units checking the area. A short time later, Deputy Wilson observed a purse hanging on a fence, which matched the description of the one the suspect was carrying when she fled. Deputy Hunt and K9 Gunnar arrived at the location and began a track to find the suspect. Fresh footprints in the snow were observed as K9 Gunnar led the deputies to an unsecured back door of a residence on McCabe, Page 3 just North of Sprague. Multiple K9 warning announcements were given without response. As deputies worked to obtain a search warrant, a resident of the home was contacted. The resident said he did not know the female suspect, he did not give her permission to enter his residence, and gave deputies permission to enter and search for the suspect. With the continued K9 warnings still being ignored, in addition to the threats the suspect made of being armed and her willingness to be combative to avoid arrest, K9 Gunnar was deployed on a lead. He located a black coat and new makeup lying on the floor before leading deputies to a closet. Several additional K9 announcements were given and went unanswered. The door to the closet was opened and K9 Gunnar entered. He made contact with the female suspect who was hiding under a pile of blankets and other items. She initially failed to comply with deputies' commands, but she soon surrendered and was taken into custody without further incident. The female suspect was provided medical attention before being transported and booked into the Spokane County Jail for Robbery 1st Degree, Burglary 1st Degree and Resisting Arrest. An addlitional charge of Possession of a Controlled Substance -Methamphetamine was added after a white crystalline substance, which tested and showed a presumptive positive result for methamphetamine, was located inside the suspect's purse. Warnings from Deputies & K9 Khan Fail to Persuade Wanted Felon - Wanted 19 -year-old felon attempted to avoid arrest and tried to hide from Spokane Valley Deputies, including Deputy Kullman and his partner, K9 Khan. Even after multiple K9 warnings, along with K9 Khan loudly announcing his presence, the male suspect chose to not follow commands and surrender. K9 Khan was deployed and quickly located the suspect, who continued to struggle and resist arrest. In early January, just after 10:00 p.m., Spokane Valley Deputy Tyler Kullman was parked in a parking lot near Coleman and Appleway when he observed a dark -colored SUV that was occupied by two males drive out of a parking lot and travel south on Coleman. The driver, later identified as a 19 -year- old male felon, looked at the patrol car and quickly turned his head away. Deputy Kullman recognized the driver as a wanted subject they had searched for in the past and heard the engine of the SUV rev as the vehicle accelerated. As Deputy Kullman attempted to catch up to the vehicle, it turned west on 2nd Avenue without signaling the turn. When Deputy Kullman turned on 2nd Avenue, he observed the vehicle pull in front of a residence approximately a block and a half away. Both males exited the vehicle and ran into the house located in the 6900 block of E. 2nd Ave. While waiting in the area, Deputy Kullman learned there had been multiple warrant calls at the residence for a white male, the same 19 -year-old male suspect. He pulled up the suspect's booking photo and confirmed he was the driver of the SUV. Dispatch confirmed the male suspect had an active Washington State Department of Corrections Escape Community Custody felony warrant for Possession of a Control Substance. Deputy Kullman and Deputy Wallace attempted to make contact at the front door while additional units covered the back of the house to block potential escape routes. At the front door, they contacted a female who agreed to check the house for the suspect. A short time later, she came back to the door and advised she couldn't find him and welcomed the deputies inside to check. Several people were contacted inside, including the male passenger from the vehicle, but the male suspect was not located. No one could say where the male suspect had gone, but indicated he might have fled out the back or tried to hide. Deputy Kullman returned to his vehicle to retrieve K9 Khan. They went to Page 4 the back yard with Deputy Acosta and gave verbal K9 warnings advising the male suspect he was under arrest and needed to surrender or a K9 would be used to search the back yard, and if the K9 located him, he would be bitten. With no response from the male suspect, K9 Khan began searching the yard toward the deck. Along the back side of the deck, K9 Khan's behavior changed, his ears perked up, and he pulled against his lead toward the deck, which was covered with furniture, garbage, and other miscellaneous items. Unable to see under the deck, Deputy Kullman gave four more K9 warnings in addition to giving K9 Khan a command to bark, which Khan followed multiple times, but the male suspect still refused to show himself and surrender. When K9 Khan was deployed, he immediately went up onto the deck, through the piles of trash, and made contact with the suspect who was hiding under a tarp and some boxes. Instead of following commands, the male suspect began to struggle and a small hammer -type item, with two sharp metal points on either end, fell to the ground. Deputy Wallace and Deputy Acosta moved in to take control of the suspect while Deputy Kullman had K9 Khan release his hold. The suspect continued to fight the efforts of the deputies, resisted arrest, and disregarded their commands to comply, but the deputies were able to gain control after a short struggle. The male suspect was provided medical attention, due to the K9 contact, prior to being transported and booked into the Spokane County Jail for the felony warrant in addition to new charges of Resisting Arrest and Obstructing. The male suspect did inform deputies he heard the K9 warnings, but didn't surrender because he was tired of going to jail and he didn't think K9 Khan would find him. Deputies Arrest Suspect Sleeping in Stolen Car - Spokane Valley Deputies responding to a suspicious vehicle call found a 28 -year-old male sleeping in the backseat of a reported stolen vehicle. The male suspect was arrested and found to be in possession of brass knuckles, a knife, shaved keys, and burglary tools. In early January, at approximately 9:00 a.m., Spokane Valley Deputy Jeff Conway arrived in the 4200 block of N. Silas Rd. to investigate a suspicious vehicle that had been reported by a citizen. The caller stated the vehicle arrived around 2:30 a.m., it parked across the street, and a male was inside with the vehicle running. Deputy Conway checked the vehicle's license plate and learned the vehicle had been reported stolen earlier in the morning. As he approached the vehicle, he observed a male who appeared to be sleeping in the backseat. The male suspect was detained with the assistance of Deputy Cassandra Erickson without incident. The suspect had a set of brass knuckles, a folding knife, and shaved keys (commonly used to steal vehicles) on his person. A shaved key was found in the ignition of the vehicle and a pry bar was located on the passenger's side floorboard. After being advised of his rights, the suspect refused to answer questions. He was transported and booked into the Spokane County Jail for one felony Possession of a Stolen Vehicle, and three misdemeanors: Possession of a Dangerous Weapon, Making/Possessing Motor Vehicle Theft Tools and Making/Possessing Burglary Tools. The suspect, however, was released the next day on his own recognizance after his first appearance before a judge. SVIU Detectives Would Like Your Help Locating a Stolen Compressor - Spokane Valley Investigative Unit Detectives investigated a theft and sought the public's assistance in looking for a stolen compressor, which was taken from a worksite northeast of Pines and Mirabeau Pkwy. In early January, a manager of Divcon Inc. reported a towable Sullair portable air compressor was stolen from a jobsite located in the 12600 block of E. Pinecroft Way sometime between the afternoon of January 5th and the morning of January 8th. The compressor was painted green and mounted on a single -axle, black frame with "Divcon Inc." stickers on it bearing a Washington license plate of 7513ZV. A few hours after we put the information out along with a photograph on Facebook asking for our community's assistance, a citizen noticed the compressor in the 5300 block of N. Page 5 Evergreen and reported it. Deputy Gorham responded to the area and confirmed the equipment was the stolen compressor, which appear undamaged and released back to an employee of Divcon Inc. Thank you to everyone who helped disseminate the information, helped look for compressor and ultimately locate it. Suspect Arrest at Scene of Early Morning Violent Assault - Spokane Valley Deputies responding to an alarm at the Cenex Zip Trip in the early morning hours arrested a 36 -year-old male suspect who was still inside the store. The store clerk/victim, who had been viciously beaten and sexually assaulted, was found inside the restroom of the business. In mid-January, just before 5:00 a.m., Spokane Valley Deputies responded to a panic alarm at the Cenex Zip Trip Store, located at 8215 E. Trent, in Spokane Valley. Already in the area, deputies arrived quickly and found the 24-hour store dark inside with the front door unlocked. When they began to enter, they contacted a male later identified as the suspect, exiting the restroom. He was immediately detained as deputies worked to locate anyone else inside the business. The injured adult female victim was found inside the restroom partially dressed. She told deputies she had been beaten, strangled, and sexually assaulted, by the suspect. She received immediate medical attention at the scene and was transported to local hospital for serious, but non -life-threatening, injuries. Spokane Valley Major Crimes Unit Detectives were called to the scene to continue the investigation. The male suspect, a convicted felon and a Level 3 Registered Sex Offender from Chelan County, was transported and booked into the Spokane County Jail for Rape 1st Degree and Assault 2nd Degree. Continuing this investigation, in early February, Spokane Valley Major Crimes Detective Rob Satake charged the male suspect with two additional crimes of Burglary 1st Degree with Sexual Motivation and Kidnapping 1st Degree with Sexual Motivation. He remains in the Spokane County Jail with a $750,000 bond set for these charges. Detectives Charge 2 Robbery Suspects, Concluding a Lengthy Investigation of a 2017 Armed Robbery at a Spokane Valley Home — In late January, Spokane Valley Major Crimes Detective Darin Staley charged two suspects, both with several felony convictions, with Robbery 1st Degree. The suspects are believed to have been armed when they entered a Spokane Valley home, demanding drugs and money from the victim in February 2017. In late February 2017, at approximately 3:30 a.m., Spokane Valley Deputies responded to a residence in the 700 block of S. Arties for a report of two subjects, armed with guns, who broke into the residence and demanded money. During an initial interview of one of the occupants of the home, deputies were told he was sleeping when two males, wearing black jackets and black bandanas covering their faces, woke him up. Both suspects were described as white, medium -build males, one armed with a rifle, and one with a shotgun. They told the victim they knew he had money and guns and demanded them. During the robbery, one of the victim's roommates started to exit his bedroom, which distracted the two suspects. The victim struggled with one of the suspects and gained control of a shotgun and pointed it at the other suspect. As he pulled the trigger, the suspect he had taken the weapon from, hit the barrel upward causing the shot to hit the ceiling. The victim was then struck in the head with the butt end of a gun. He got up and ran from the residence to call 911 while his roommates barricaded themselves in their bedroom. Deputies, with the assistance of K9 Laslo and his handler Deputy Thurman, cleared the residence to check for the suspects and determine if anyone inside was injured. Deputies observed several items (drug paraphernalia) commonly used in the sales and abuse of controlled substances. Additional deputies set up a perimeter and Deputy Thurman and K9 Laslo attempted a track to locate the fleeing suspects. They located a Ziploc baggie, filled with what appeared to be methamphetamine, wrapped in a shirt and hidden under a piece of equipment in the back yard. Despite their continued efforts, the suspects were not located. Spokane Valley Major Page 6 Crimes Detectives responded to the scene to continue the investigation. The victims inside the residence denied ownership of the drugs or knowing who the suspects were. Through the interviews, detectives learned the roommate, who exited his bedroom prior to the shotgun being fired by the victim, wears hearing aids and is partially deaf. During a search of the residence, they located a dry erase board believed to have been left by the suspects in the victim's room with a phrase "Dope & $ or you die" written on it. They also recovered a roll of duct tape in the same bedroom. With all the information and evidence gained during the investigation, detectives surmised the roommate was the intended target of the robbery, possibly over drugs and money, and the suspects presented the message on the dry erase board to the victim, believing he was deaf. Several items were submitted to the Washington State Patrol Crime Lab for fingerprint and DNA processing. The cumulative results of the of the testing led detectives to a 51 -year-old male suspect (seven -time convicted felon) and a 41 - year -old male suspect (18 -time convicted felon). Continuing the investigation, Detective Staley developed additional information supporting the lab results. In late January 2018, Detective Staley added a Robbery 1st Degree to the booking charges of the two suspects, who were already in custody at the Spokane County Jail for unrelated charges. Fresh Prints in the Snow Help Lead to Arrest of Suspect in 144 Block Crime Spree - Spokane Police Officers booked a 31 -year-old male suspect into Spokane County Jail for multiple felony charges after a crime spree in late January that started in the 2500 block of east Stn Ave. in the City of Spokane and ended in the 16900 block of east Nora in Spokane County. Spokane Police Officers booked the male suspect for 1st Degree Burglary, 2' Degree Robbery, and Theft of Motor Vehicle. Further felony charges are expected from the Spokane County Sheriff's Office. In late January, just after 5:OOam, Spokane Police Officers responded to the report of an occupied residential burglary in the 2500 block of East 8th. It was reported that the male suspect (unknown to the victims) entered the home through an unsecured door at the back of the residence. The suspect then confronted the homeowner and demanded the keys to the victim's vehicle saying he was suicidal and the police were after him. The victim complied, in fear that other family members, including two young children, in the home could be harmed due to the suspect's irrational behavior. Officers arrived on scene and checked the area, but were unable to find the suspect. They were, however, able to locate very distinct footprints leading from the east side to the back of the victims' house where entry was gained, and then again leaving out the front of the house (see pictures). The suspect had also provided the victim with his name during the confrontation so officers were able to narrow it down to the male being the likely suspect. Within 15 minutes, just after 5:30am, the Spokane County Sheriff's Office received a report of a single vehicle crash in the 1700 block of North Arc in Green Acres. Dispatch advised the stolen vehicle from the earlier incident in Spokane crashed in the front yard of a residence and the suspect was seen running west on Nora. Several Officers and Deputies from multiple agencies (Spokane Valley Police, Spokane County Sheriff's Office, Spokane Police Department, Liberty Lake Police Department) responded to the area to locate the suspect. A short time later, dispatch advised they were receiving another call reporting a male broke into an occupied residence in the 16900 block of East Nora. Spokane Police Officers arrived quickly and took the male Page 7 suspect into custody with Spokane Valley Deputies arriving to assist. Spokane Police transported and booked the male suspect into the Spokane County Jail for 1st Degree Burglary, 2nd Degree Robbery, and Theft of Motor Vehicle in connection with the initial incident. Spokane Valley Deputies continued contacting witnesses/victims and collected evidence in the area of the suspect's arrest, as they continued to investigate the morning's events. Additional charges of Burglary and Hit and Run are anticipated. Stolen Vehicle, Shaved Keys, Heroin - After checking a vehicle's license plate and learning it had been reported stolen, Spokane Valley Deputy Chad Eaton stopped the vehicle in the 7500 block of E. Buckeye. Both the driver and passenger were arrested on felony charges. In late January, at approximately 3:50 a.m., Deputy Eaton observed a red Ford Escort near Park and Rutter. He checked the vehicle's license plate on his mobile computer and received a return showing the vehicle as stolen. The 27 -year-old male driver of the vehicle abruptly turned into a driveway in the 7500 block of E. Buckeye, causing Deputy Eaton to activate his lights before backup arrived. Deputy Eaton kept his distance and ordered the male suspect and the 21 -year-old male passenger to keep their hands raised as he waited for additional units. During that time, the passenger repeatedly moved around in the vehicle and appeared to be attempting to hide something near the center console in front of him. Both suspects were detained without incident with the assistance of backup deputies. While clearing the car, a set of obviously shaved/altered keys were located on the center console. One of the shaved keys fit into the ignition, allowing the ignition to turn and start the vehicle. A small, dark brown ball believed to be heroin, along with numerous small baggies among other trash, was observed on the passenger's side floorboard. The substance was later field tested and showed a presumptive positive result for Heroin. After advising both suspects of their rights, they were interviewed and subsequently arrested. Ten additional shaved/altered keys were located on a key chain inside the suspect driver's backpack. He was transported and booked into the Spokane County Jail for Possession of a Stolen Motor Vehicle, Possession of Motor Vehicle Theft Tools and Driving While Suspended 2nd Degree. The suspect passenger was transported and booked into the Spokane County Jail for Possession of a Controlled Substance -Heroin. Information: Suspicious Behavior/Possible Child Luring Attempt - Spokane Valley Deputies responded to a suspicious person call where a 10 -year-old child stated a male talked to her in the toy isle of Walmart and told her she needed to leave with him. The child was not grabbed, threatened, or hurt, and quickly ran to an adult family member in the next isle. On the first of January, at approximately 3:15 p.m., Spokane Valley Deputies responded to Walmart, located at 5025 E. Sprague, for a report of a suspicious male who told a young child she needed to leave the store with him. The child did the right thing and immediately ran to an adult family member in an adjacent isle. Deputies checked the store and surrounding area for the male, but were unable to locate him. The child was not harmed or injured and, with the information she and other witnesses provided, deputies believe they have possibly identified the male. This information was forwarded to the Spokane Valley Sexual Assault Unit for further investigation. Thankfully, this child knew exactly what to do when she was contacted by a stranger. We encourage you to take a few minutes to talk to your children about situations like this and explain/reinforce they should never go anywhere with anyone without first checking with a parent or guardian. Page 8 For additional information on how to keep your children safe and for educational tips/tools, please visit the National Center for Missing & Exploited Children's Education webpage at http://www.missingkids.com/education. LOCK ITEMS IN YOUR TRUNK OBSERVE AND REPORT CARS SHOULD KEEP GARAGE NEVER RUN DOORS CLOSED UNATTENDED ******************** Page 9 Spokane County Sheriff's Office Regional Intelligence Group Spokane Valley Districts IBR Classification: Burglary Month Count Year 2015 2016 2017 Calendar 2018 January 84 72 56 49 February 66 73 59 March 71 78 44 April 68 87 54 May 69 73 49 June 86 93 59 July 103 89 52 August 86 103 56 September 94 91 78 October 105 71 37 November 81 92 33 December 81 63 35 Grand Total 994 985 612 49 * IBR Offense: Burglary/Breaking & Entering 220 Produced: 2/20/2018 For Law Enforcement Use Only This document is confidential and may not be further disseminated or released to any unauthorized persons pursuant to RCW 42.56.420 Spokane County Sheriff's Office Regional Intelligence Group Spokane Valley Districts IBR Classification: Murder NonNeg Manslaughter 2.5 2 1.5 1 • ■ * ■ 0.5 0 JANUARY FEBRUARY S V a 2 CC a > W > E- < z J In D a SEPTEMBER OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER X2015 2016 2017 Calendar 2018 Month Count Year 2015 2016 2017 Calendar 2018 January 1 February March 1 April May June July 1 1 August 1 September October 2 November 1 1 1 December 1 Grand Total 5 4 2 *IBR Offense: Murder/Non-Negligent Manslaughter 09A Produced: 2/20/2018 For Law Enforcement Use Only This document is confidential and may not be further disseminated or released to any unauthorized persons pursuant to RCW 42.56.420 Spokane County Sheriff's Office Regional Intelligence Group Spokane Valley Districts I BR Classification: Identity Theft 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 JANUARY ■ >- W >- E- < z J In D a SEPTEMBER OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER X2015 2016 2017 Calendar 2018 Month Count Year 2015 2016 2017 Calendar 2018 January 9 18 February 1 24 March 22 April 16 May 32 June 18 July 23 August 9 13 September 7 17 October 7 15 November 10 20 December 8 27 Grand Total 42 236 18''' *IBR Offense: Identity Theft 26F Produced: 2/20/2018 For Law Enforcement Use Only This document is confidential and may not be further disseminated or released to any unauthorized persons pursuant to RCW 42.56.420 Spokane County Sheriff's Office Regional Intelligence Group Spokane Valley Districts IBR Classification: Fraud Month Count Year 2015 2016 2017 Calendar 2018 January 12 23 27 70 February 18 17 38 March 20 21 37 April 18 15 43 May 24 8 53 June 14 19 57 July 17 26 63 August 29 15 54 September 24 16 68 October 34 41 65 November 18 38 56 December 25 30 46 Grand Total 253 269 607 70, * IBR Offense: Fraud - Credit Card/ATM 26B, Fraud - False Pretenses/Swindling/Con Games 26A, & Fraud - Impersonation 26C Produced: 2/20/2018 For Law Enforcement Use Only This document is confidential and may not be further disseminated or released to any unauthorized persons pursuant to RCW 42.56.420 Spokane County Sheriff's Office Regional Intelligence Group Spokane Valley Districts IBR Classification: DUI Month Count Year 2015 2016 2017 Calendar 2018 January 30 30 24 20 February 22 30 26 March 25 31 33 April 28 23 18 May 27 27 19 June 29 31 28 July 31 19 26 August 31 18 24 September 18 20 19 October 25 19 24 November 20 28 18 December 13 27 22 Grand Total 299 303 281 20 * IBR Offense: DUI 90D Produced: 2/20/2018 For Law Enforcement Use Only This document is confidential and may not be further disseminated or released to any unauthorized persons pursuant to RCW 42.56.420 Spokane County Sheriff's Office Regional Intelligence Group Spokane Valley Districts IBR Classification: Drugs Month Count Year 2015 2016 2017 Calendar 2018 January 2 5 19 36 February 3 30 March 2 2 30 April 4 1 37 May 1 6 23 June 2 2 20 July 3 1 21 August 4 16 26 September 5 28 25 October 4 20 24 November 1 19 38 December 3 27 30 Grand Total 31 130 323 36 * IBR Offense: Drug Equipment Violations 35B & Drugs/Narcotics Violations 35A Produced: 2/20/2018 For Law Enforcement Use Only This document is confidential and may not be further disseminated or released to any unauthorized persons pursuant to RCW 42.56.420 Spokane County Sheriff's Office Regional Intelligence Group Spokane Valley Districts IBR Classification: Theft From Motor Vehicle Month Count Year 2015 2016 2017 Calendar 2018 January 134 101 98 76 February 124 76 102 March 96 72 94 April 62 134 131 May 84 108 79 June 68 177 107 July 85 139 99 August 92 131 71 September 109 103 120 October 112 124 70 November 92 153 55 December 110 118 70 Grand Total 1168 1436 1096 76 * IBR Offense: Theft From Motor Vehicle 23F Produced: 2/20/2018 For Law Enforcement Use Only This document is confidential and may not be further disseminated or released to any unauthorized persons pursuant to RCW 42.56.420 Spokane County Sheriff's Office Regional Intelligence Group Spokane Valley Districts IBR Classification: Motor Vehicle Theft Month Count Year 2015 2016 2017 Calendar 2018 January 62 112 44 34 February 64 53 38 March 53 66 44 April 53 75 42 May 72 59 27 June 58 81 28 July 73 73 41 August 60 39 36 September 78 35 43 October 66 51 40 November 59 33 33 December 80 39 28 Grand Total 778 716 444 34 * IBR Offense: Motor Vehicle Theft 240 Produced: 2/20/2018 For Law Enforcement Use Only This document is confidential and may not be further disseminated or released to any unauthorized persons pursuant to RCW 42.56.420 Spokane County Sheriff's Office Regional Intelligence Group Spokane Valley Districts IBR Classification: Robbery Month Count Year 2015 2016 2017 Calendar 2018 January 11 3 3 6 February 9 7 6 March 12 8 7 April 6 4 3 May 6 8 2 June 5 5 1 July 8 5 4 August 7 3 1 September 15 2 4 October 7 10 4 November 3 10 3 December 11 3 1 Grand Total 100 68 39 6' * IBR Offense: Robbery 120 Produced: 2/20/2018 For Law Enforcement Use Only This document is confidential and may not be further disseminated or released to any unauthorized persons pursuant to RCW 42.56.420 Spokane County Sheriff's Office Regional Intelligence Group Spokane Valley Districts IBR Classification: Assault I 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 JANUARY FEBRUARY 1 0 a 2 > W > E- < z J In D a SEPTEMBER OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER X2015 2016 2017 Calendar 2018 Month Count Year 2015 2016 2017 Calendar 2018 January 157 131 97 97 February 141 140 95 March 138 146 78 April 131 142 90 May 151 143 93 June 140 115 95 July 143 123 98 August 136 63 76 September 130 81 94 October 149 99 88 November 124 97 86 December 127 88 88 Grand Total 1667 1368 1078 97 * IBR Offense: Aggravated Assault 13A & Simple Assault 13B Produced: 2/20/2018 For Law Enforcement Use Only This document is confidential and may not be further disseminated or released to any unauthorized persons pursuant to RCW 42.56.420 Spokane County Sheriff's Office Regional Intelligence Group Spokane Valley Districts IBR Classification: Theft Month Count Year 2015 2016 2017 Calendar 2018 January 233 240 208 233 February 242 208 201 March 258 215 220 April 239 232 207 May 227 194 240 June 239 264 252 July 259 242 244 August 266 203 231 September 247 222 219 October 227 232 240 November 194 244 221 December 278 225 201 Grand Total 2909 2721 2684 233. * IBR Offense: Theft - All Other 23H, Theft - Pocket -Picking 23A, Theft - Purse -Snatching 23B, Theft - Shoplifting 23C, Theft From Building 23D, Theft From Coin -Operated Machine 23E, & Theft of Motor Vehicle Parts/Accessories 23G Produced: 2/20/2018 For Law Enforcement Use Only This document is confidential and may not be further disseminated or released to any unauthorized persons pursuant to RCW 42.56.420 Spokane County Sheriff's Office Regional Intelligence Group Spokane Valley Districts IBR Classification: Rape Month Count Year 2015 2016 2017 Calendar 2018 January 7 7 8 16 February 10 7 5 March 6 9 7 April 10 8 9 May 9 12 11 June 5 9 3 July 5 5 6 August 13 2 6 September 3 4 3 October 14 5 9 November 9 6 5 December 8 4 7 Grand Total 99 78 79 16 *IBR Offense: Rape - Forcible 11A Produced: 2/20/2018 For Law Enforcement Use Only This document is confidential and may not be further disseminated or released to any unauthorized persons pursuant to RCW 42.56.420 Spokane County Sheriff's Office Regional Intelligence Group Spokane Valley Districts IBR Classification: Counterfeiting Forgery Month Count Year 2015 2016 2017 Calendar 2018 January 18 14 9 17 February 18 13 11 March 11 25 20 April 7 6 20 May 9 10 26 June 9 15 15 July 12 11 21 August 12 7 15 September 8 11 20 October 12 7 18 November 6 15 9 December 19 12 14 Grand Total 141 146 198 17'' *IBR Offense: Counterfeiting/Forgery 250 Produced: 2/20/2018 For Law Enforcement Use Only This document is confidential and may not be further disseminated or released to any unauthorized persons pursuant to RCW 42.56.420 Spokane County Sheriff's Office Regional Intelligence Group Spokane Valley Districts IBR Classification: Destruction Damage Vandalism Month Count Year 2015 2016 2017 Calendar 2018 January 162 133 161 141 February 130 111 149 March 127 148 136 April 126 151 173 May 130 134 139 June 130 176 143 July 125 154 178 August 141 160 150 September 130 118 160 October 156 165 120 November 129 196 131 December 163 161 109 Grand Total 1649 1807 1749 141 IBR Offense: Destruction/Damage/Vandalism 290 Produced: 2/20/2018 For Law Enforcement Use Only This document is confidential and may not be further disseminated or released to any unauthorized persons pursuant to RCW 42.56.420 Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 01/01/18 — 01/31/18 MAINTENANCE Agreements for Services Adopted and In Operation * Budget estimates ** Does not include January Contract Name Contractor Contract Amount Total % of Contract Expended Expended Street Maintenance Street Sweeping Storm Drain Cleaning Snow Removal Landscaping Weed Spraying Emergency Traffic Control Litter and Weed Control State Highway Maintenance Traffic Signals, Signs, Striping Dead Animal Control Poe Asphalt AAA Sweeping AAA Sweeping Poe Asphalt Senske Spokane Pro Care Senske Geiger Work Crew WSDOT Spokane County Mike Pederson $1,366,663.00 $490,200.00 $189,990.00 $282,578.46 $62,256.92 $20,124.20 $10,000.00 $70,000.00 $265,000.00 $632,000.00 $20,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $26,458.50 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $6,515.70 $0.00 $0.00 $1,400.00 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 9.36% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 9.31% 0.00% 0.00% 7.00% ©®®©©...... Citizen Requests for Public Works - January 2018 Request Submitted In Progress Waiting 30+ da s Resolved C.A.R.E.S. CPW Projects Dead Animal Illegal Dumping Illicit Discharge Landscaping ROW Report a Pothole Roadway Hazard Solid Waste - Compla Storm Draina:e / Erosions Sign & Signal Requests Traffic 6 1 11 4 2 4 12 7 2 11 12 21 Deicing - Priority 1,2,3_.' Deicing - Priority 4 Snow Berms Snow Comments Snow Plowing Damag Snow Plowing P1-3 m'®' Snow Plowing P4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 6 1 11 4 2 3 12 5 2 10 12 21 13 16 38 13 0 13 26 Totals 213 0 5 208 January 2018 Snow and Ice Operations Date Mag (Gallons) Iceslicer (Tons) Snowfall Pre -Treat Deicing Plowing 01/01/18 Trace 01/02/18 4150 7.00 0.0 X 01/03/18 1300 10.00 0.0 01/04/18 2400 3.00 Trace X 01/05/18 10.00 Trace 01/06/18 1600 15.00 Trace X X 01/07/18 0.2 01/08/18 1200 Trace X 01/09/18 1300 Trace X 01/10/18 1400 2.00 0.0 01/11/18 73.00 6.3 X 01/12/18 60.00 0.2 X 01/13/18 700 0.0 X X 01/14/18 0.0 01/15/18 0.0 01/16/18 50 0.0 01/17/18 1100 0.0 01/18/18 600 0.0 X X 01/19/18 700 0.0 01/20/18 1300 0.1 01/21/18 1800 Trace X X 01/22/18 2600 0.0 X X 01/23/18 0.7 01/24/18 700 0.0 X X 01/25/18 3600 0.1 X X 01/26/18 1700 0.2 X X 01/27/18 1600 0.3 X X 01/28/18 Trace 01/29/18 0.0 01/30/18 0.0 01/31/18 50 0.0 X Totals 25,700 180.00 8.10 Season Totals 97,800 1,058 32.4 STREET MAINTENANCE ACTIVITY The following is a summary of Contractor maintenance activities in the City of Spokane Valley for January 2018: • Poe Asphalt, JH Landscape - Provided drivers for snow plow operations. • Geiger Work Crew - Tree trimming, litter pickup and sidewalk snow removal. WASTEWATER Status of the process can be monitored at: http://www.spokaneriver.net/, http://www.ecy.wa.gov/geographic/spokane/spokane river basin.htm, http://www.spokanecounty.org/utilities/WaterReclamation/content.aspx?c=2224 and http://www.spokaneriverpartners.com/ 2 STORMWATER UTILITY The following is a summary of City Stormwater Utility activities for January 2018: • Continued attending steering committee meetings for Ecology's update of the Stormwater Manual for Eastern Washington, which could have implications to update the Spokane Regional Manual. • Continued working on the following tasks: o Prepared 2018 Storm Drain Cleaning contract for advertisement. o Provided stormwater recommendation packets for CIP projects. o Finalized stormwater rolls for County Treasurer. o Assisted Maintenance in deploying GPS units for tracking plows/trucks. o Updated stormwater GIS layers. o Responded to snowmelt/rain events, 8-10 sites. o Stormwater action requests for small works and maintenance projects 2018. Current status to date is shown below: Stormwater Project Requests (Incl. Public and In -Staff Requests) Jan -18 Total Requests Logged Since 2009: 326 2018 Completed Projects: Completed Projects 2009-2017: Locations not warranting work: 0 195 52 Total Project Backlog: 79 Remaining Projects Assigned for 2018-2020 Small Works: Maintenance: Large Capital: 41 28 10 Unfunded Projects Large Capital: 6 3 CAPITAL PROJECTS Public Works Projects Monthly Summary - Design & Construction January -2018 Project# Design & Construction Projects Funding Proposed Ad Date Bid Open Date %Complete Estimated Construction Completion Total Project Cost PE 1 CN Street Projects 0123 Mission Ave - Flora to Barker 0141 Sullivan & Euclid PCC 0142 Broadway @ Argonne/Mullan 0166 Pines Rd. (SR27) & Grace Ave. Int Safety 0249 Sullivan & Wellesley Intersection Improv 0251 Euclid Avenue Reconstruction Project 0258 32nd Ave Sidewalk-SR27 to Evergreen 0264 8th Ave Sidewalk- Dicky toTheirman 0265 Wellesley Sidewalk Project 0267 Mission SW- Bowdish to Union FHWA - STP(U) FHWA - STP(U) TIB - UAP HSIP FHWA - STP(U) COSY TIB - SP CDBG FHWA - CMAQ TIB - SP Street Preservation Projects 0248 Sprague Street Pres - Sullivan to Corbin FHWA-STP(U) 0252 Argonne Resurfacing: Broadway to Indiana FHWA-STP(U) Traffic Projects 0201 ITS Infill Project- Phase 1 0222 Citywide Reflective Signal Back Plates 0259 North Sullivan ITS Project 0263 Citywide Signal Backplates Parks Projects 0227 Appleway S.U.P. - Pines to Evergreen 0237 Appleway Trail - Sullivan to Corbin FHWA - CMAQ HSIP FHWA - CMAQ HSIP FHWA - STP(U) COSY 03/23/18 03/03/17 TBD 03/23/18 05/03/19 03/10/17 04/13/18 03/16/18 TBD TBD 04/13/18 03/24/17 TBD 04/13/18 05/24/19 03/31/17 04/27/18 03/30/18 TBD TBD 03/02/18 03/23/18 04/13/18 05/04/18 02/23/18 03/16/18 N/A N/A 03/30/18 04/20/18 N/A N/A 95 100 90 100 15 100 90 50 20 0 0 97 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11/15/18 12/31/17 12/31/18 11/01/18 12/31/19 12/31/17 09/28/18 12/31/18 12/31/18 $ 4,333,334 $ 2,404,838 $ 2,526,301 $ 878,865 $ 1,370,000 $ 3,041,206 $ 471,891 $ 485,851 $ 447,000 $ 486,000 90 0 12/31/19 $ 1,977,273 50 0 10/31/18 $ 640,000 100 100 90 100 0 26 0 17 10/31/18 03/01/19 12/31/18 12/31/18 $ 350,402 $ 81,000 $ 914,209 $ 124,862 11/11/16 12/09/16 100 98 10/31/17 $ 2,134,057 11/10/17 12/08/17 100 0 12/31/18 $ 2,130,000 Project# Design Only Projects Funding Design Complete %Complete Total Project Cost PE Date Street Projects 0143 Barker Rd/BNSF Grade Separation FHWA - STP(U) 0205 Sprague/Barker Intersection Improvement COSV 0223 Pines Rd Underpass @ BNSF & Trent COSV 0247 8th & Carnahan Intersection Improvements CDBG Street Preservation Projects 0254 Mission - McDonald to Evergreen 0256 University Rd Pres -24th to Dishman Mica 0257 University Rd Pres -16th to 24th Stormwater Projects 0198 Sprague, Park to University LID 0199 Havana -Yale Diversion 0200 Ponderosa Surface Water Diversion 0262 Stormwater Capacity Grant COSY COSY COSY Dept of Ecology Dept of Ecology Dept of Ecology Dept of Ecology 12/31/19 12/31/18 TBD TBD 03/31/18 12/01/18 12/01/18 03/01/20 10/31/18 10/31/18 TBD 4 5 5 9 0 80 90 90 30 35 35 0 $ 2,827,702 $ 51,619 $ 1,710,000 $ 250,000 $ 67,000 $ 48,000 $ 53,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING The following is a summary of Development Engineering activities for January 2018: • Assisted Building and Planning Division with preparation of design requirements for (8) Commercial and (8) Land Use Pre -Application meetings. • Prepared Recommended Conditions of Approval for (5) preliminary plats and Dedication Language for (1) final plat. Reviewed multiple final plats and submittal packages to record final plats. • Reviewed civil plans and drainage reports for Engineered Grading Permits associated with commercial and land use projects. Coordinated with private Engineers and Developers. • Met with Planning Commission to discuss proposed changes to the City's Street Standards. • Met with citizens and developers in Permit Center to answer inquiries and discuss design requirements for potential commercial and land use projects. • Conducted preconstruction meetings, performed site visits, prepared punch lists, reviewed surety estimates, and reviewed and approved construction certification packages to finalize final plats and to issue commercial building certificates of occupancy. TRAFFIC Traffic Scoping, Vistas at Belleaire Staff met with the developer for the Vistas at Belleaire to scope a Transportation Impact Analysis report for this proposed subdivision. Vistas at Belleaire is a proposed residential development within the City of Spokane Valley about 0.75 -miles east of Sullivan Road and 0.80 -miles south of Sprague Avenue. The project would be made up of about 226 single family homes on 81.5 -acres in an R-3 single family residential zone. The scoping meeting was attended by both Spokane County and WSDOT officials for their scoping requests because the two principal arterials that will feed the subdivision will be Sullivan and Barker Roads. Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) Strategic Plan Update Traffic is currently working to establish a scope and fee to update the City's Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) Strategic Plan with Transpo Group, the consultant who that performed the original study back in 2011. Assisted CIP Street projects are in full design mode and Traffic continues to assist CIP in generating plans and specifications for their street projects. PLANNING AND GRANTS Community Development Block Grants (CDBG) CDBG issued a request for proposals for the 2018 program year. Project applications for two sidewalk improvement projects were submitted: Wilbur Road, Boone to Broadway (west side) and Knox Avenue, Hutchinson to Sargent (south side). Due to funding availability, Spokane County recommended that both sidewalk projects receive funding. 5 Upcoming Grant Programs for 2018 Staff is evaluating its TIP, along with various other planning documents, to identify potential projects that are eligible for the various grant funds. Information regarding these funds and their eligible projects will be discussed with City Council in February and March 2018. The following is a brief description of funds: Washington State Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board (FMSIB) issued the following call for projects: 1. Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Program Applications Due: March 30th Funds Available: $10 Million for 2019-2021 and $15 Million for 2021-2023 Program Purpose: Improve the movement of freight and/or mitigate the movement of freight through local communities. Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) issued the following calls for projects: 2. Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) — City Safety Program (CSP) Applications Due: April 16th Funds Available: $25 Million shared by two programs (2/3 for Systemic, 1/3 for Spot) Program Purpose: Reduce fatal and serious injury crashes on City streets using engineering improvements/countermeasures. 3. Safe Routes to School (SRTS) Applications Due: April 27th Funds Available: $19,150,000 Program Purpose: Increase the number of children walking and biking to school safely. 4. Pedestrian and Bicycle Program (PBP) Applications Due: May 11th Funds Available: $18,380,000 Program Purpose: Reduce collisions with pedestrian and bicyclist and increase the number of people who choose to walk and bike for transportation. Another call for projects will be made available through Spokane Regional Transportation Council (SRTC) in March 2018 and will include Surface Treatment Block Grant (STBG), Surface Treatment Block Grant — Set Aside (STBG-Set Aside), and Congestion Mitigation & Air Quality (CMAQ). More information to follow. Amendment to the 2018 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) From January to October each year, the City has a recurring opportunity to update the previous year's Six-year Transportation Improvement Program. A February amendment identifies additional projects and updates to existing projects for the 2018 TIP. Additions include a Right - of -Way phase for the Barker Grade Separation project and 2017 projects extending into 2018. An administrative report will be submitted on February 20. Adoption is anticipated in March 2018. 6 Draft 2019-2024 Six Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) RCW 35.77.010 requires local jurisdictions to prepare and, after holding a public hearing, adopt a revised and extended comprehensive transportation program for the ensuing six calendar years. The Washington State Department of Transportation requires adoption of this plan byJune 30th each year. A draft list of updated and new projects for 2019 to 2024 is currently under review. Ongoing projects from the last TIP will roll over into the new program. A draft document will be submitted as an Administrative Report for City Council in April. This is an ongoing project through June 2018. Pavement Management Update Staff has consulted with IMS Infrastructure Management Services to conduct its biennial survey of the City's street network. The network survey was conducted in September and October of 2017 and December 2017 marked the first review of IMS's data collection results. This survey helps to identify the current and projected roadway network conditions, identifies network needs and evaluates network priorities. Network condition is rated on a scale from 0- 100 (0=worst, 100=best) and assigned a Pavement Condition Index (PCI) score and a Backlog score. Overall, the City's network has a PCI of 71 and a backlog of 6%. Backlog is defined as the accumulation of "failed" road segments within the City network that are waiting to be repaired. Backlog is quantified as the percentage of the overall road network that is falling below a minimum PCI level. Staff is currently in the process of evaluating various levels of service (i.e. PCI and backlog levels) and the associated costs for each. Once complete, this information will be made available for review and discussion. 7