The URL can be used to link to this page

2018, 03-06 Study Session AGENDA SPOKANE VALLEY CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION FORMAT (with some action items) Tuesday,March 6, 2018 6:00 p.m. CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10210 E Sprague Avenue (Please Silence Your Cell Phones During the Meeting) CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL ACTION ITEMS: 1.First Reading Proposed Ordinance 18-006,False Alarm Code Amendment- Morgan Koudelka [public comment] DISCUSSION LEADER SUBJECT/ACTIVITY GOAL NON-ACTION ITEMS: 2. Colin Quinn-Hurst Proposed Amended 2018 Transportation Discussion/Information Improvement Program(TIP) 3. Gloria Mantz, Craig Aldworth Pines and Grace Intersection Safety Discussion/Information Project 4. Erik Lamb Code Text Amendment, Small Cell Discussion/Information Facilities 5. Mark Calhoun Accomplishments Report(2017) Discussion/Information 6.Mayor Higgins Advance Agenda Discussion/Information 7.Mayor Higgins Council Check in Discussion/Information 8.Mark Calhoun City Manager Comments Discussion/Information ADJOURN Study Session Agenda,March 6,2018 Page 1 of 1 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: March 6, 2018 Department Director Approval: ❑ Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ® new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information [' admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: First Reading Proposed Ordinance 18-006, False Alarm Code Amendment GOVERNING LEGISLATION: N/A PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Council approved the False Alarm Program contract C09-163 on October 13, 2009, which became effective January 1, 2010, and ended December 31, 2012, and which included up to three additional, one-year contract renewals. Council extended the contract for one year on December 29, 2015. Council provided consensus to move forward with an internal false alarm program and amended ordinance on October 18, 2016. Council approved an amended False Alarm Ordinance 17-001 on January 10, 2017. Council heard an administrative report on this topic on February 20, 2018. BACKGROUND: The City started the current false alarm program in 2010 in order to reduce the number of false alarms, improve police response times, increase officer safety, and create more time for proactive policing. Spokane Valley Municipal Code 7.20.010.A states, "The City regulates security alarm businesses to assure that responses to false alarms do not diminish the availability of police services to the general public and to assure that citizens who cannot afford or do not choose to operate security alarm systems are not penalized for their condition or choice." Spokane Valley Municipal Code 7.20.130.A. states, "Causing police to engage in a false alarm response constitutes an appropriation of public police services for private purposes and is subject to a cost recovery fee." In 2015, staff conducted an evaluation of the program, costs and revenues, and dispatch records. Council approved several changes to the program based upon that evaluation, including lowering the cost recovery fees. In October of 2016, Council approved a new in-house false alarm reduction program that reduced costs further, simplified administration, and reduced government regulation and intrusion. This program does not require registration of an alarm system and makes police response to an alarm trip voluntary for the alarm system owner. The customer may opt-out of that service with the alarm monitoring company. The accompanying draft code amendment language presented will clarify the duties of the alarm administrator, including the ability to mitigate a cost recovery fee up to 25% if he believes the facts and circumstances warrant it. Additionally, after suspending the false alarm reduction program while an in-house program and accompanying database were developed, the program is scheduled to restart on approximately March 15, 2018. The City is sending letters out to all known alarm companies and publishing an article in the Hot Topics Newsletter to inform people of the program reinstatement, lower costs, and fewer req uirements. OPTIONS: Move to advance the ordinance to a second reading, with or without further amendments. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to advance Ordinance 18-006, amending the False Alarm Code, to a second reading. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Approximately $500 in cost for online payment services. All costs are included in the cost recovery fee. STAFF CONTACT: Morgan Koudelka, Senior Administrative Analyst, John Pietro Administrative Analyst ATTACHMENTS: False Alarm Code Amendment Draft (Different colors of mark-up reflect changes by different contributors) DRAFT CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY SPOKANE COUNTY,WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 18-006 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON, AMENDING CHAPTER 7.20 OF THE SPOKANE VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO FALSE ALARMS,AND OTHER MATTERS RELATING THERETO. WHEREAS, the City of Spokane Valley previously adopted chapter 7.20 Spokane Valley Municipal Code in 2009,to be effective January 1,2010; and WHEREAS, the purpose and intent of adopting the original chapter 7.20 SVMC was to ensure that responses to false alarms did not diminish the availability of police services to the general public; and WHEREAS,through implementation and use of chapter 7.20 SVMC over the years, staff and the Spokane Valley Police Department have become aware of several issues that should be clarified through amendments to the Code, particularly relating to the authority and process for mitigating false alarm response cost recovery mitigation fees; and WHEREAS,Article 11,section 11 of the Washington State Constitution allows local governments to make and enforce within their jurisdictional limits, local laws and regulations not in conflict with the general laws of the State; and WHEREAS,the City Council, in enacting this Ordinance, seeks to promote the City's interest in protecting the public health, safety, and welfare of the residents of the City. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley, Washington ordains as follows: Section 1. Amendment. Chapter 7.20 of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code is hereby amended as follows: 7.20.170 Mitigation and Appeals. (A) Mitigation of Fees. False alarm response cost recovery fees may be mitigated in In certain circumstances as follows:an alarm owner who is assessed a false alarm cost recovery fee may accept the determination of a police response to be a false alarm but may wish to present mitigating circumstances to the alarm administrator. (1) The mitigation process shall be initiated by the alarm user contacting the alarm administrator, either in person, by mail, or by phone and identifying any •: .• ••_ . .•• . . .. . . consider mitigating circumstances pertaining to the incident resulting in the false alarm cost feeewiy-fee. This request shall be received by the alarm administrator within 30 calendar days after mailing of the initial invoice to the alarm owner. Failure to comply with this 30-day requirement shall render any mitigation request untimely and therefore void. A request to mitigate the fees shall not toll the 30-day appeal period pursuant to SVMC 7.20.170(B). (2)The alarm administrator is authorized to mitigate the false alarm response cost recovery fee by up to 25%if,in the alarm administrator's discretion,the facts and circumstances warrant mitigation. If mitigation is approved,the alarm user waives any further right to appeal. Ordinance 18-006 Amending Chapter 7.20 SVMC—False Alarms Page 1 of 3 DRAFT (B) Appeals of False Alarm Response Cost Recovery Fees. False alarm response cost recovery fees may be appealed to the alarm administrator, as follows: (1) The appeal process shall be initiated by the alarm user sending a letter to the alarm administrator requesting that the false alarm response cost recovery fee be waived, and specifying the reasons for the appeal. This letter shall be received by the alarm administrator within 30 calendar days after mailing of the initial invoice to the alarm owner. Failure to comply with this 30-day requirement shall render any appeal untimely and therefore void. B-(2)False alarm response cost recovery fees may be appealed only on the grounds that the incident cited as the basis for the false alarm violationcost recovery fee service fee was, in fact,not a false alarm response or that the alarm was activated due to an extreme weather event or a natural disaster. Human error or mechanical/electronic failure of the security alarm system are not valid reasons for appeal.The alarm user shall,in his letter requesting an appeal,describe detailed,credible evidence in his possession that supports the assertion that the incident was a valid alarm pursuant to SVMC 7.20.130(C)or(D)an alarm activation due to an extreme weather event or natural disaster. Q(3)The alarm administrator may reject requests for appeals that are not supported by detailed, credible evidence of criminal activity or extreme weather events or natural disasters. Notice of rejection of a request for this initial appeal shall be sent to the appellant in writing within 10 calendanver-k-ing days following receipt of the appeal request by the alarm administrator. a(4)The alarm administrator may affirm or, waive, cancel, or modify the false alarm response cost recovery fees or actions that are the subject of the appeal. A record of the determination on h pp 1 qucstany modification of the false alarm cost recovery fee shall be recorded and forwarded to the police chief and the city manager on a monthly basis. &(C)If the alarm administrator affirms or modifies the amount of a false alarm response recovery fee due,that amount becomes immediately due and payable. A record of the determination on each appeal and mitigation request shall be forwarded to the police chief and the city manager on a monthly basis. F7(D)The official decision of the alarm administrator shall be final and not subject to further appeal. Section 2. Severability. If any section, sentence,clause or phrase of this Ordinance is held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section,sentence,clause or phrase of this Ordinance. Section 3. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect five days after date of publication of this Ordinance or a summary thereof in the official newspaper of the City. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley this day of March,2018. L.R.Higgins,Mayor ATTEST: Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Ordinance 18-006 Amending Chapter 7.20 SVMC—False Alarms Page 2 of 3 DRAFT Approved as to Form: Office of the City Attorney Date of Publication: Effective Date: Ordinance 18-006 Amending Chapter 7.20 SVMC—False Alarms Page 3 of 3 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: 3-6-18 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ® admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: DRAFT 2018 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Amendment #1 GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 35.77.010 PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Council adopted the 2018-2023 Six Year TIP on May 27, 2017, Resolution #17-011; On July 25, 2017, Council passed a motion authorizing staff to apply for the Transportation Improvement Board's call for projects for sidewalk improvements on Mission Avenue from Bowdish Rd. to Union Rd. and for intersection improvements on Broadway Ave. from Argonne Rd. to Mullan Rd. BACKGROUND: The projects and associated expenses listed in the adopted TIP are based upon available information at the time of adoption relative to available funds and how those funds could be allocated. This amendment includes updates to anticipated 2018 expenses for several previously adopted projects. In addition, several ongoing projects from 2017 are continuing into 2018, requiring the addition of these carry-over projects into the 2018 TIP. Finally, after the May 2017 adoption of the 2018 TIP, the City received award letters for grant opportunities from the Transportation Improvement Board (TIB), necessitating the addition of these new projects into the 2018 TIP. Based on this information, it is recommended that the 2018 TIP be amended to include these projects. A public hearing and adoption of the Amended 2018 TIP is scheduled for March 13, 2018. OPTIONS: Discussion RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Discussion BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: The project costs shown in the draft Amendment #1 to the 2018 TIP are based on the award funding letters received from the TIB. There are sufficient funds available to meet the local match requirements for these projects. STAFF CONTACT: Colin Quinn-Hurst, Senior Transportation Planner Mike Basinger, AICP, Economic Development Manger ATTACHMENTS: Draft 2018 TIP Amendment #1; PowerPoint City of Spokane Valley Department of Public Works Adopted 2018 Transportation Improvement Program (Adopted by Resolution 17-011 on 5/23/17) Primary City Total 2018 Proj.# Project From To Source Amount Project Costs 1 0205 Sprague/Barker Intersection Improvements Sprague @ Barker City $ 33,000.00 $ 40,000.00 2 0249 Sullivan-Wellesley Intersection Imp Project Sullivan @ Wellesley County $ 3,000.00 $ 120,000.00 3 0252 Argonne Pavement Preservation Broadway Indiana STP(U) $ 77,000.00 $ 570,000.00 4 0143 Barker Road/BNSF Grade Separation Barker @ BNSF RR Fed/Other $ 668,000.00 $ 1,400,000.00 5 0259 North Sullivan ITS Project 1-90 Trent CMAQ $ 109,000.00 $ 804,000.00 6 0223 Pines(SR27)/BNSF Grade Separation Pines(SR27) Evergreen Other FED $ 955,000.00 $ 1,630,000.00 7 0248 Sprague Preservation Sullivan CORBIN STP(U) $ 203,000.00 $ 1,502,000.00 8 0254 2018 Street Preservation Projects Various Various City $ 2,200,000.00 $ 2,200,000.00 9 Appleway Trail Evergreen Sullivan CMAQ $ 22,000.00 $ 164,000.00 11 Argonne Concrete Reconstruction Indiana Montgomery Other $ 102,000.00 $ 512,000.00 12 Coleman Road Sidewalk 4th Ave 2nd Ave Other FTA $ 5,000.00 $ 25,000.00 13 Evergreen Resurfacing Mission Indiana STP(U) $ 4,000.00 $ 32,000.00 14 0123 Mission Ave. Flora Rd. Barker Rd. TIB $ 680,000.00 $ 3,400,000.00 15 Park Road#2 Broadway Indiana STP(U) $ 22,000.00 $ 162,000.00 Funded Projects $5,083,000 $ 12,561,000 Planned Projects $ 5,083,000 $ 12,561,000 City of Spokane Valley Department of Public Works AMENDED 2018 Transportation Improvement Program Resolution 18-0_,(_-_-2018) Primary City Total 2018 Proj.# Project From To Source Amount Project Costs 1 0205 Sprague/Barker Intersection Improvement Sprague @ Barker City $ 35,700.00 $ 40,000.00 2 0249 Sullivan-Wellesley Intersection Imp Project Sullivan @ Wellesley County $ 25,272.00 $ 267,200.00 3 0252 Argonne Pavement Preservation Broadway Mission STP(U) $ 77,200.00 $ 572,000.00 4 0143 Barker Road/BNSF Grade Separation(RW) Barker @ BNSF RR Fed/Other $ 668,000.00 $ 2,160,000.00 5 0259 North Sullivan ITS Project 1-90 Trent CMAQ $ 109,000.00 $ 804,000.00 6 0223 Pines(SR27)/BNSF Grade Separation Pines(SR27) Evergreen $ 1,200,000.00 $ 1,200,000.00 7 0248 Sprague Preservation Sullivan CORBIN STP(U) $ 203,000.00 $ 1,502,000.00 8 0254 2018 Street Preservation Projects Various Various City $ 2,200,000.00 $ 2,200,000.00 9 Appleway Trail Evergreen Sullivan CMAQ $ 22,000.00 $ 175,000.00 11 Argonne Concrete Reconstruction Indiana Montgomery Other $ 102,000.00 $ 512,000.00 12 Coleman Road Sidewalk 4th Ave 2nd Ave Other FTA $ 5,000.00 $ 25,000.00 13 Evergreen Resurfacing Mission Indiana STP(U) $ 4,000.00 $ 32,000.00 14 0123 Mission Ave. Flora Rd. Barker Rd. TIB $ 680,000.00 $ 3,400,000.00 15 Park Road#2 Broadway Indiana STP(U) $ 87,000.00 $ 162,000.00 0251 Euclid Reconstruct Flora Rd. Barker City $ 200,000.00 $ 300,000.00 0141 Sullivan/Euclid Concrete Intersection(RW/CN) Sullivan @ Euclid STP(U)/TIB $0.00 $ 14,000.00 0222 Citywide Reflective Signal Backplates(PE/CN) Various locations HSIP $ 900.00 $ 81,000.00 0227 Appleway Trail Pines Evergreen STP $ 10,000.00 $ 30,000.00 0237 Appleway Trail Sullivan Corbin RCO/COM $ 572,000.00 $ 2,215,000.00 0259 North Sullivan ITS Project 1-90 Trent CMAQ $ 101,500.00 $ 750,000.00 0258 32nd Ave Sidewalk SR27 Evergreen TIB $ 83,000.00 $ 415,300.00 0264 8th Ave Sidewalk Dickey Thierman CDBG $ 32,000.00 $ 464,000.00 0263 Citywide Signal Backplates Various Locations HSIP $ 1,000.00 $ 123,850.00 0166 Pines(SR-27)/Grace Intersection Safety Project Pines(SR 27)@ Grace Ave HSIP $200,000.00 $ 402,710.00 0201 ITS Infill Project(CN) Various locations CMAQ $ 74,000.00 $ 403,000.00 0155 Sullivan West Bridge Sullivan @Spokane River TIB $0.00 $ 55,000.00 0265 Wellesley Sidewalk Project(PE) McDonald Evergreen SRTS $ 10,000.00 $ 40,000.00 Broadway Ave. Argonne Mullan Rd TIB $ 450,000.00 $ 2,250,000.00 8th Ave and Carnahan Road 8th @ Carnahan City $ 450,000.00 $ 450,000.00 Mission Ave.Sidewalk Bowdish Union TIB $ 12,000.00 $ 60,000.00 Barker Road (Euclid to Garland)PE Euclid Garland City $ 106,500.00 $ 106,500.00 $7,721,072 $21,211,560 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates ordy that may change due to a variety of circumstances,and are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions. Funded Projects Updated Dollar Amounts 2017 Carry Over Projects New Projects City o Valley 2018 ,.. _ ____ . . . . ,,, ___ . . .., . , _ -;,, • ., . p• • .or Transportation.,, ,,„ __ � -4� ,., Improvement Program ,,,....,... --. vo. . - .._ -taw ,„ _ , ,.,..„,_,,,,,___ 1 N\iiiiiit,,,.. Amendments H SPOKANE 14 VALLEY ,..• ..,:. *. . , -------- ., , ,.__I • _..........., . , . ; _______ . ... • ies.„---- __.......... 674 S P 1 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 2018 - 2023 TIP - . _____ _ Adopted 'Ur SPOKANEA VALLEY 2018 — 2023 Six Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) May 23, 2017 4_ _ _ �. `" �' � T rte. _ ..,,,�,� :- ale. x s -~ a__'., --,"•' � c-c L.` *`+'yam z' .. �d - r -.---4"-,, '.'" -_ �- . ,o- .s_. -�,.;- - '.rte--,--- . '•°�^ r y '�`... s- � -�.•rife' • - :�. -7,„,_,a - -s��^_"sem.,' -� { '110 F .w +} .0 •- y- ---- may i m..'. . y 10 = ' VALLEY � ,. der ---,--- - , IIYAI SPOKANE 2 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 2018 - 2023 TIP Approved a E {o TABLE OF CONTENTS L " ice. By410 SRTC Board t Resolution of TIP Air Quality Conformity Finding Approval ii A — Resolution of TIP Approval v 0 Li Metropolitan Planning Area Self-Certification vi yam' '. Title VI Public Notice ail ` _ _ - INTRODUCTION 1 of .!` October 2 017 1 w --- Spokane Regional roc spo anon Council TIP Development Process 1 TIP Consistency Determinations 3 12, Metropolitan Transportation Plan 3 Congestion Management Process 3 A Air Quality Conformity 4 0 CD 2017-2020 TIP Accomplishments 5 ii N0. FINANCIAL PLAN 8 Project Selection S Financial Feasibility S 1t.. STA Financial Capacity 9 C 2018-2021 TIP PROJECTS 11 A Overview 12 • L ` Document Organization 12 Program Summary 13 i Project Map by Project Type 17 allyProject Details 19 r. L L11� o 0 - APPENDICES NA SRTC Information B Public Comments CV iirri __ C TIP Amendments and Administrative Modifications -t- D Local,State,and Federal Revenues aCa ^ eao - _' I E STIP Project Pages O L !1T�a' LW I 6,,,,,,7A a SPOKANEVAat a SRTC LI 101 r 549.3 111:701 wwww O ow =11 20182021 Transportation Improvement Program l Spokane Regional Transportation Council 43191!Omsk,. SprtlRrtr.Wes 99Qa1 549.341 2:170 ww+.•srDc.or< N' ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ch g t 2Projects to 2018.2021 TransSRTCportation Improvement Program • ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,„„q,,,,,o,,,,,,„ Detailed Project Information Pu rp ose t. 1 Spokane North Sullivan ITS Project SV024 • Update d a m o u n is Valley Federal Aid#: ,-, �s .,___-- -”. STIP ID#: WA-06167 ■ Carry over projects tms Management&Operations 1` s. _, — Road Name: Sullivan Rd Spokane,.. po��a� y` ■ Add newprojects F To: Trent Ave Length:(miles) 1.82 , Project Description: The project includes the installation of conduit and extension of the fiber optic lines for the continuation of the Intelligent Transportation System(ITS)along Sullivan Road from 1-90 to Trent Ave(SR290).This would connect the traffic signal controllers at Central Pre-Mix, Marietta,Euclid,Kiernan and Trent Ave to the SRTMC via existing fiber optic lines at Indiana.It would also install cameras at a couple locations. Funding Sources Total Estimated Cost of Project I $914,209 Fund Source Amount CMAQ Federal $790,790 Local Local $123419 SPOKANE > 4 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Updated Projects • Sullivan-Wellesley intersection improvement project (PE, ROW) • Argonne pavement preservation (PE, ROW, CN) • Barker Road / BNSF grade separation (RW, CN) • Pines (SR27) / BNSF grade separation (PE) araiSPOKANE Sullivan-WellesleyIntersection . , . . „in Project Description: • Intersection improvement _ ■ PE, ROW -- Wellesley Updated: - , __ :-_ _ ,._______ 1 4103. ._.41, City amount A, • .. I r -4.- $25,272 . AA nu � F' ' N. . RI Total Costs7-, - n $2677200 �' s • J 9Fokane - .S • �Ihman Walley 4'entla�e enscre�s _ f- immimps _ • ... .. 1 L • ," . .1,.....: 1 g SPOKANE r _7- 80 —--- 1 is s - ALLEY - , im „ , „ 0 75 150 • 300 Feet ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PreservationAr onne - to Project Description:p ,LLQ- w a • Street preservation f - i J • :1.: • PE, ROW, CN _ • ... Updated. Cit amount: - t',; ;ii- ,.: „. ., . . •,. y` �/ � y �, $777200 ,J— ��fi�o y a� ' t. Total cost: mem __ ,. T �.-.:- :., , $5727000 ...---S0 e d ® • 477,N4`4, x� a • SPOKANEr _ 14 • - x . VALLEY 0 225 450 900 Feet N ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Barker Road 111 BNSF Grade Separation 1 • . _ .__ • . . .. Project Description: ;- ;: .-.. ... - ,. , ... • Grade separation project o-+ . wF 4 • 4 5` i �hw .-.-- -&.N.. Y+ .. ,■ ROW CN 3 .ti_ $ y �a ; k a • !U dated: ' ,rc,nroo _ City amount: . Park .` R$668,000 a— r y „..... _ . , ..- . . , ?. .. ._‘ Total costs: osnman l'.'411' '''''''e Le `F $2,1 -s,„ .......m60,000 ,_ SPOKANE `- ,. �(r �� I d: 120 240 480 Feet ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Pines (SR27)/ BNSF Grade Separation Project Description: ..� ., �. 4, ,f}- - x F .�� y ■ Grade separation project = . . .3. Updated: " City amount: 3: .rte e $1,200,000' , f no Total Costs: •,i____11-,1 �A a m,m g , I • PE $172007000 1 1 — - okane .- ,, - - 11 ■ r � '— c } l' . ! .:.', -.• . . ., „ i , SPOKANE a - _ til, VALLEY 135 270 540 Fe et ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Carry Over • Euclid reconstruct (CN) • Citywide reflective signal backplates (CN) • Sullivan/Euclid concrete intersection (CN) • Citywide reflective signal backplates (CN) • Appleway Trail - Pines to Evergreen (CN) • Pines (SR27)/Grace intersection safety project (PE, CN) • Appleway Trail - Sullivan to Corbin (CN) • ITS infill project (CN) • North Sullivan ITS project (PE, ROW, CN) • Sullivan west bridge (CN) • 32nd Ave sidewalk (PE, CN) • Wellesley sidewalk project (PE) • 8th Ave sidewalk (PE, CN) alSPOKANE VALLEY 10 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Euclid Reconstruction - Flora to Barker Project Description: • Road reconstruction ■ CN - - { •� *AFF r z . .2017 Carryover: � sa City amount: - q , too as 3 t, . ' Fes' 1f 1 $200,000 __ i Total costs: .. 1..., h �n,•.n 1 r ,I $300,000 :{ ,� ri U I i.. .--di — v 'ir.t.g1 1,,sM1r ar Valle}' Veiadale piggy 's f$ A 4 . •• - -" L• .1_,_,,. \II . • qL - :-1 3 rN IlZ.711111:41 SPOKANE ECONOMIC �r} . 751 _,,, U.125 0.25 a.5 Mies ' 11 ALIEY - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Sullivan/ Euclid Concrete Intersecti.__ _ I _ on Project Description: I�, • ; . 3 • Intersection reconstruction , ,,i . '� Kms. • C I - . _ . tucl:r 2017 Carryover: ° City amount: _ Tr. r„ rc,n°roe of 1 I ak` :a y* ` 61 11 1 . C_� Pa Total cost: _ 4 `, fr- - h 71 $14,000 �poka�,a .� oisnmzn valley veraaeie �emc,ys ,, h I N. riAlr I Pr r r Pyy m SPOKANE ---4.,„ ,... V 0 75 50 00 Feet l i Al. I. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT TrailiAppIewa _ pines to Evergreen . , . f Project Description: r` , rt • Construct a 12-foot wide shared-use ° path and pedestrian crossings at Pines road and Evergreen Road : ; 4, s ,}= EJ 2 • CN -�. ,, 1� i �' . .. ' 1, 2017 Carryover: w5 1 ire, ti t 4uCity amount: � $10,000 Oa ' . .ny��.�m.n ' ° rt `i` '. ��- Pay a - y i r 444 I — ,-,„ I Total cost. F. �, .. Sp kene ID 15133,313 Valley eg -, - ' � . $30,000 'V1 ��.�5-1 : °, , rA "MI SPOKANE y ,`l ■rye r �_.J� i .. c_ x 1 O K A N E `i w , ' ¢ � C0 0.125 0.25 0.5 Miles ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Appleway Trail - Sullivan to Corbin 1 . . • Project Description: - ■ 12 foot wide shared use path, landscaping, trail amenities, and ® ,- E. , ° - T ' _, r restroom 11 -: _ d � • CN m, . � • 2 017 Carryover: `: n Cityamount. — �wn,,. a; y: $572 000 ' i �. 'nu�cEanlm m _. Total cost. 1 — y� 5pokan `Y ro $2,215 000 oisnman valleys 40) re� ; • ... L., jrkt Hills IL. } '�: SPOKANEr 0 175 0.35 0 7 Miles 1 VALLEY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT r11 North Sullivan ITS - Project Description: _ � - .-..: _ . , .. _ _ :. . . . , :. : - ■ Intelligent Transportation System projectWI ---ma.,„„„, 7x 01 ■ PE, ROW, CN _. � . �. 1117ter, w 2017 Carryover: ' .: _ wi, ,, _:I ... } .1 i''1 , ... i m n C a ou t: $101,500 ? F a• iiii : 41 � � `. Total cost: fNi- 11 750 000 h�� art J I j[gi 1-7-----=;1F _ eishmzn Valley 'lerotl�recre� 1-1—.., " • e �- Hen. `�-4- ',..N....,=--,,... -�. t'd _1 C 1_ J f : r .-1•44--t 0.25 0.5 1 Atlas SPOKANE fl 11 f i i l 1 i i i l N VALLEY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT I 32nd Ave Sidewalk - Pines to Evergreen '''''r -1:..1:1.;-:''.14 ' Tr '.-" .'''' ''''':. Project Description: - r _ ':. :' '" z A • Sidewalk project . R x' . . rn t.. 7 w 2017 Carryover: -.. - ,, , -� _$ :', .i,;;;;-..1,40 .A ,.„ �;- City amount: : - , ,�_ }, . E 3204 rpt $83,000 .. ,. • .� -is; 4 �_ '0:!!.51-'!'''.. - Total cost: �ret,ne $415,300 , , r 1 � ` p"m�,�Rn-- a .moi I 'r h� R� t • iill,. , L w. s ka e • v i �+ r _ !} aIsmmen Valley Verec.ie cre� ,�. +4. °°° . POKANE V L L E fX 5Zy-141 * fl o o� 0.2 0.4 Miles ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ,tea. i 6 8th Ave Sidewalk- Dickeyto Thierman .,.. r,"- ri' ..41'r',' I 1 1., V.,F 11 illp Project Description: : � � � � • • Sidewalk project % � � ,� Ty = ; .- 1• . . • PE CN 5 ` ' ' ° os,,,,, ' 1"--..,,,,*: .,... .04 L .� �� h .,Ar. o.11. 3.i° .;: -—I .,fid 911 • ,g1- �� E gthAv'- 2017 Carryover: Cit amount: 40f_ o . $32,000 _ W�_ _._ ° _ E 9 h'1744*- r -r."'/__ Total cost: NI 'NJ p4 , , 1 g, ■■ - `ax r 40'..:_-_77z— U , •I.Yvb�i 9im ium SSE S `P ,.� a $464,000 ftz.---i- _ . ; " I y, Q 5po1 51 kan 4'�" Dlshman 'JalleVe Yentla cre� } d _ ,�, _— • • L. i_ ., Oral SPOKANE VAtI ` E ,= 0 925 250 5t)0 Feet ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT - I N Citywide Reflective Signal Backplates Project Description: • Citywide reflective signal backplates 2017 Carryover: City amount: i $900 Total cost: � ~ $81,000 aSPOKANE l VALLEY� . EoE� Citywide Reflective Signal Backplates Project Description: • Signal backplates • CN , I I i s, 2017 Carryover: - City amount: e. ;: t $1,000 r,� .., 11 Total cost: $123,850 i isi 1r Ed- . 1 Le 2 t ,...., m S P VALLEY 19 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Pines and Grace Intersection Safety 11 . , Project Description: I r ` L • Intersection safety improvement _ r • n •- 1 I is Projecti_.. Illit .i 1, . , T ' 1 • PE, CN 1 . 2017 Carryover: - z _ f% - 4,0,, ., y St -Cityamount: M _ _— - Ma ; at ._ $200,000 N,� — Kai�r Total cost: — " r $402 710 - 4ff451' 1 . • Spokane Db• ' n'Isnman vaiiey weraeai� e-e � *- Y - I. " +'; Gy'!! "*, The . 14 . _ illis 4 ' . . sir■ ,- 41-4 �° , . _ SP0KANE ( 0 30 6L1 120 Feet ' ALLEY 20 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ITS Infill Project Project Description: • 1 • el 9 • Intelligent Transportation i • • System (ITS) project • /- MILLI&"WIMP MI Ii152KIM • ,1* • • CN f- 2017 Carryover: _ - l— --��-�-- — I ." -� �` LEGEND City amount: FJ __ruT �!Y CONpJT $74,000 PL&IIE iM�UTFlli FRCf9:8Pt ADLiT 5 FIBER IhET RIS? 1 Total cost: RAli.E6 kV%MO E VALLEY o $403,000 , T STOP R LblFll'h + Ct'Tv M4 LTC FAM "MACE ErCti�l a'BLLISN3 - SPOKANE � � LLE �f ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Sullivan West Bridge Project Description: _ .. „ .. .,. . 1. AFT 1 ". ,.._, ' 7. ` '� • Bridge replacement , ,f+ • CN i iiiii. . t2017 Carryover: City amount: * : , t urn i i Total cost: 1 • 4 rSpakane y L• o mman V licy vcmage� k $55,000 - ' rl` l ' • • ,{- x;, .44„ ,> _. r ,iI. �,� tit :g, t o i '�, :: • v . . . .,, _. - c. ../. , A . ,4 SPOKANE r. 1e :ia. VALLEY 0 100 200 400 Feet Ij NECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Wellesley Sidewalk Project - McDonald to Evergreen Au Project Description: 4 � : _ . � "r ■ Sidewalk project , :�. �. �-�o`��,�d� A-ve .,-� �� ■ PE . A, � 2017 Carryover • "' ' @ dy "Oh�p I City amount: F,. '� ,. - :.-,., -+ $10,000 ,. . 1 4 :, :. _ _ .t= Total cost: P� R $40 000 jr1%., k1' I I ,. E LOngfel O '. L. Spoka la - ` �'l . _. :'kI] P shm3n Valley V3mdal= w. rgcre3C +1 _ • Lam. —., , • . . ■ • . 1 - IIYAI SPOKANEVA . . „r. „,... r ,.., _ ._ ...._ .. __ . --,9. :'- . r-, __. , . . 0 125 2.5105010 Feet LIE ,i - 23 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT N New • Broadway Avenue - Argonne and Mullan Intersections (CN) • 8th Ave. and Carnahan Road Intersection Project (R0111 ) • Mission Avenue Sidewalk - Bowdish to Union (PE) • Barker Road - Euclid to Garland (PE) SPOKANE EL AM VALLEY� . EoEN24 Broadway - Argonne/Mullan Concrete Intersections Project Description: 1p - - '" \ - p 40 ‘ IF• Intersection reconstruction i rhp -thy- -Jr?, . , 0 -- • CN New Project: City amount: r. $450,000 4 Total cost: _ - sr,aka r , 1 $2,250,000 L alaYe�re� 4 \ i 1.. 10. ,,, Ji ! i fi SPOKANE (r ,, V A C L E Y I i 25 5 100 Feet N ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT -" 8th Ave . and Carnahan Road . . Project Description: �� - '' fi :.: _ ■ Intersection realignment ; iii. J • ROW New Project: 4 . _ . , , City amount: — _ — $450,000 .T�n.�., : , _ Total cost: ' Fa, rFy r A ,,,,' 450 000 '''''w)e d .: Y $ 1 , . 4. I C slim.�n 1�112y ,,encale r - —,�e c�� fit '. r1.1 . ,,... -,4-'1 , .it- ' . •. ad'_ t qtr.•1 SPOKANE11174 , ,_ F VALLEY 0 25 547 100 Feet I I 1 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT re Mission Ave, - Bowdish to Union Project Description: ■ Sidewalk project r P� , - -. PE I� ■ y r , ri.:74241:412:Ti: ;', '''' ' ' ... ; • III 411, ..-- 4-'''' ' '-' r New Project: = i � ;, �� -11 ;I 'Ga" Y City amount: - F c'r. . �-.'' =i $12000 , _, --, , , r -4. . .. Total cost: k` nt „..7 - 4 . ''':;:' a1$60,000 --a -- i s,,fa.N.`if i 0 I Sp kane •,-, N A ,_ tilshman Valleyereca�le ,�mew • �y e Iii lis i ■ �ef- titi3 �9 i,..71.„,:ii _ ., , . SPOKANE i — ` `” VALLEY .w.-' 0 125 250 500 Feet I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 N 27 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Barker Road - Euclid Ave. to Garland Ave. -,•Tp */ -'''' '. -111,1111M— P Project Description: a ■ Road widening and reconstruction `" . PE - New Project: City amount: D3 $106 500 =:3 ��r#�;nd m ,.. v° 4 I ','. r,d �part Total cost: ` A m m ------:0 �a, y $106,500 ' Q . .....0 i — d P Q S�i�hdiie oshm. Valley vereeaieoire,,,coq > _. {-''‘ LI1 �'- i rr L L Euciid�Aive r- '.... . d- r •'. • y „ . ,,, - .--,-_,-, p $ i iYviEW Ct ' Ill Cri KLL ';` fi 0 0.125 0.25 0.5 Miles ' LEfN 28 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 1 �. • _rte; { ' r_ _ . IF.- • r 16 a „€=�6 .;�r--,.... ,f�.' , J„♦ ` if Questions? SPOKANE VALLEY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: 3/6/2018 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ® admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Pines (SR 27) and Grace Avenue Intersection Safety Project, CIP 0166 GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 35.77.010, Perpetual Advanced Six-Year plans for coordinated transportation program expenditures. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: • February 7, 2017—Administrative report discussing amending the 2017 TIP, which included Pines and Grace Intersection Safety Project. • February 28, 2017 — Council passed Resolution 17-006, amending the 2017 TIP. • June 27, 2017 —Administrative Report discussing the project. BACKGROUND: The Pines Road and Grace Avenue intersection had 41 reported collisions between 2012 and 2016. Total crash data for 2017 has not been compiled yet. The predominant crash type involves left turning vehicles waiting on Pines Road in a live lane of traffic for a gap to make the left turn. While waiting, these vehicles have been rear-ended, sometimes at speeds over 35 mph. The other significant crash type involves left turning drivers on Pines misjudging the gap and getting hit by oncoming traffic. These types of crashes often result in injuries. Of the 41 crashes reported in the 2012-2016 period, 16 crashes resulted in injuries. In 2017, there was one fatal crash. This project will widen Pines Road to the east from a four to a five-lane section by adding a center turn lane on Pines Road on either side of the Grace Road intersection. This improvement will tie in with a previous project that widened Pines Road at Mirabeau Parkway, creating a continuous five-lane section between Mirabeau and Grace. The center turn lane will reduce traffic congestion and improve safety by improving visibility and providing a refuge for turning vehicles. One of the goals of this project is to improve sight distance for eastbound traffic using the Grace Avenue intersection at Pines Road. On the west side of Pines at Grace, there are existing fences, signs, and walls that obstruct sight distance. The original design proposed to remove the sight obstructions at the intersection which required purchasing right-of-way on each of the corners for the west approach of the intersection at Grace Avenue. Unfortunately, the City was unable to come to reasonable negotiations with the property owner at the southwest corner. As a result, staff designed a median island or "pork chop" that allowed eastbound drivers on Grace to only turn right, restricting northbound movements onto Pines Road. A community meeting was held on June 12, 2017, where staff presented the proposed design. Fifteen people signed in at the meeting. All of the meeting attendees expressed concerns with the proposed pork chop. Additionally, the City heard from five more citizens that objected to the pork chop either by email or telephone. Area residents were concerned that eastbound traffic using Grace to turn left would use other parallel roads like Buckeye to bypass the pork chop to make their northbound left hand turn onto Pines. This movement increases traffic on other streets and the northbound turning problem at Grace will only be moved to another intersection. Residents already experience a high number of speeding vehicles using their streets to avoid trains, and they are concerned with the safety of their neighborhood children. Staff worked with WSDOT to come up with other design options. WSDOT approved a design that narrows the drive lanes to 11 feet (12 feet is typical) and widens the sidewalk at the southwest intersection of Pines and Grace to improve the sight distance. Staff held a public meeting on January 3, 2018, to present the new design. There were thirteen people in attendance. The public did not raise concerns with the revised design and praised the City for developing a different option. OPTIONS: Discussion only RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Discussion only BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: The total project budget is $871,100. The total estimated cost falls within the current budget. STAFF CONTACT: Gloria Mantz, Engineering Manager Craig Aldworth, Project Manager ATTACHMENTS: Presentation ■ T . Pinesiz.. race Ave y- --,B, +■ �� *via, BM r,tr--- _ ___. ntersection Safety Project -- __ % _,,_.___ / Fil €. . _...: .. .___---ii-, ____ -10---- I"- g r ---r-•;• k„ i - iliiiiiit, a rte T --- - - _: -- ,, . - .. _ - . _: - ___ __ - il .,.a,plc. . ,... - . ____. r 1 ,,,__ 11-- i /, iff - '' . ' Iiirv' Arl .41Wt-L..__.. , . Y _g: r AO 10 -1. 1 , r i.r • ' iti - I • .� . � `s ,,, , ii.5 �: R, � March 6, 2018 * , 4y '. fM ,, -i, II - . 4"i IC4:10 \ ,•".,A - . . ' '' -��-- Gloria Manz PE, Engineering Manager . . k • -- ( 4 i CraigAldworth, PE, Project Manager Spoane r, ,- ..„..*Valley t,` March 6, 2018 Presentation Agenda Project Location Existing Conditions Project History Project Design Temporary Traffic Control Project Cost & Funding Tentative Schedule Sn�e`, `"'oa 2 P Valley March 6, 2018 Project Location iii co m rim ." 1 PINES (SR27) I ■I ■MIMMM. 1M WI 1MMMMM. IM MI MM=M1.1 NI MI 1=MMIN_ II s Mrs IM MI MINEIMMI MI MB 11IMMMM. f MI 1111 S`"'oan�e`� 3 P Valley- March 6, 2018 Existing Conditions Two Drive Lanes, Each Way No Left Hand Turn Lanes w W -1 • U \ 10 PINES ROAD (SR 27) \ - 4 �.r�- March 6, 2018 Traffic Accident Pattern __. )- �,...) , o o _ �f , - - - 2z PINES ROAD 1$R 27L 95+U0 o 4 1 99+00 2 2 -�• 4 LEGEND , f W U CRASH TYPE SYMBOL I I g I LEFT TURN INTO 4- I 0 I ONCOMING TRAFFIC REAR END WHILE ,I 5i WAITING TO TURN 5 INDICATES INJURY o • March 6, 2018 Existing Sight Obstructions 1 Vinyl Fence (N&S) q, Subdivision Sign (N&S) t. , Retaining Wall (S Corner) :ii:, Power Pole (N Corner) .lam ------------- r _ iiimo s ____. __ . . ..., . .., _ . .,_ _.:10. ., _ _ _ _ __ ... . _ ...,_ . _. ..,:...,... ., _:,....„.... ;.... ,.. _ ,...... .__..., . At.,A,,,„:„ .„... ,. 1040,4 S s March 6, 2018 Project History Original Design Proposed to Remove Existing Sight Obstructions Require Acquisitions at the West Intersection of Grace and Pines Could not Reach a Reasonable Agreement with Owner at the SW corner of Pines & Grace Proposed Pork chop Design Prohibiting Left Turns (Northbound) onto Pines Road Public Raised Many Concerns at June 12, 2017 Meeting Local Streets Already Experience High Speed Traffic from Vehicles Avoiding Trains Safety of Neighborhood Children Pork chop will Divert Additional Traffic from Grace Avenue to Other Streets 7 March 6, 2018 Project History Redesigned intersection to Allow vehicles on Grace Avenue Left Turns (northbound) onto Pines Rd . Narrowed Lane Design to 11 feet Wide Pursue Code Enforcement for Unpermitted Fence at SW Corner of Pines & Grace Citizens Supported Project as Presented At January 3, 2018 Public Meeting S`" lane 8 P Valley March 6, 2018 Project Scope Add Left Turn Lanes Improve Sight Distance at Pines & Grace (West Side) Provide Stormwater Improvements Not a Pavement Preservation Project WSDOT is Responsible for Maintaining Pavement S`" lane 9 P Valley March 6, 2018 Project Design West Leg Sight Distance Improvements Relocate NW Corner Fence and Shrubs, Trim Subdivision Planter Relocate SW Corner Fence Relocate Curb 2' East, Widen Sidewalk RETAINING WALL j I w MODIFY SUBDIVISION OBSTRUCTION I ?. > PLANTER fp w -7 - 0 RELOCATED FENCE RELOCATED kl '// f f r, \ `\ AND SHRUBS r 1111\\ FENCE (� r fi .. `'r l'. ` \ r - —" — — — IIII7MAIEK -Ln Mil 4 10 PINES ROAD (SR 27) -- March 6, 2018 Project Design Pines Road Revisions Add left turn lane by adding pavement on east side only Narrow lanes to 11 feet wide • Shift northbound traffic east RW RW 30' 45' .----•� v SIDEWALK VARIES 12.5'LANE 11' LANE 11' TURN LANE 11' LANE 12.5 LANE 6' SIDEWALK 4.5 TO 8.7 w SAWGUT NEW SIDEWALK, ti ROAD er CURB AND GUTTER F WIDENING c3 EMNITMEMITIOMOSI EXISTING ROADWAY INLAY PINES RD (SR27)LOOKING NORTH TYPICAL SECTION March 6, 2018 Project Design New Left Turn Lanes ►, ■ A NNW- PINES ROAD (SR 27) J r r 0 //1"' 12 March 6, 2018 Stormwater Improvements _.. Stormwater Swales — East Side ROADWAY 6' SIDEWALK SWALE BOTTOMwAu Th----,, INLET i \\_ - W'n *DRYWELL SWALE NORTHEAST CORNER OF PINES Spokane 13 4000Valley March 6, 2018 TemporaryTraffic Control Pines Road At Least One Lane Open, Each Way at All Times Grace Avenue West Side Closed for Project Duration East Side Flagged alternating one way traffic during working hours At least one lane open, each way during non-working hours S`" lane`, 14 P Valley March 6, 2018 Project Cost and Funding Project Estimated Cost Preliminary Engineering $ 161,000 Right-of-Way $ 184,475 Construction $ 525,625 Total Estimated Cost $ 871,100 Project Budget City Fund 402 $ 200,000 Federal Safety Grant $ 671,000 Total Estimated Budget $ 871,100 Spokane 15 P Valley March 6, 2018 Tentative Schedule March 23 Bid Advertisement April 13 Bid Opening April 24 Council Bid Award June 19 Construction Start Mid August Project Completion Sn�e`, `"'oa 16 P Valley March 6, 2018 Questions _ _ 14.0,4; ___"..'s,4„ fr ..„..„..._ - PINES ROAD (SR 27) 1 1 c C 111110 0 10 --,' 44/ lit n m *dime 17 P Valley- CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: March 6, 2018 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ® admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Administrative report— proposed small cell deployment regulations. GOVERNING LEGISLATION: Various Federal laws; chapter 35.99 RCW; RCW 35.21.860; chapter 22.120 SVMC. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: At its February 14, 2017 workshop, Council heard an administrative report on small cell deployments generally. On December 19, 2017, Council heard a report on the proposed amendments. BACKGROUND: Wireless telecommunication facilities are subject to a number of increasing federal and state laws. Further, wireless telecommunications are ever evolving, with new technologies and new business models continuing to be implemented. Currently, the wireless telecommunication providers are in the midst of rolling out"small cell"technology to meet growing bandwidth and data needs of their customers. The City has been working with the providers, a consortium, and internally to develop appropriate draft franchises and draft regulations to allow implementation of the small cell technology. The proposed regulations were presented to the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission considered the proposed regulations during its meetings on January 11, January 25, February 8, and February 22, 2018. The Planning Commission received substantial input from three small cell facility providers - Mobilitie, Verizon, and T-Mobile — through the Planning Commission's public hearing. Generally, the providers were supportive of the proposed regulations, although there were some comments to certain Planning Commission recommendations, as detailed below. Ultimately, the Planning Commission voted 6-0 to recommend the proposed amendments with several modifications for City Council consideration and approval. History Wireless Technology. Historically, wireless communications have been provided through antenna arrays located on private property, either attached to large "monopoles" or attached to existing structures, such as tall buildings or water towers. Monopoles can be upwards of 150 feet tall. An example of a monopole is the pole located east of City Hall adjacent to the Appleway Trail. The primary array is referred to as a "macrocell" and it delivers wireless transmissions to a large area. However, as one gets further from the macrocell,the signal gets weaker and becomes less reliable. Additionally, with the advent of smart phones, there has been an exponential increase in the demand for wireless data, and the macrocells have limits on the amount of data they can transmit. Accordingly, wireless telecommunications providers have developed technology to assist with the transmission of data from the macrocell and to boost the signal of the macrocell within the primary coverage area. This technology is referred to as "small cell" technology. It consists of smaller antennae located in various sites around the macrocell. It is referred to as "small cell" because the antennae generally are small and could fit within an imaginary enclosure of no more than three cubic feet. These cells are located on smaller Page 1 of 5 structures, such as light poles, power poles, and other smaller poles between 30-60 feet tall. The small cells collect the wireless signals and retransmit those signals to the macrocells wirelessly (which requires line of sight) or through fiber. This "backfill" boosts the capacity, reliability, and speed of the macrocells for all customers. Legal Framework. Since historically wireless telecommunications were provided through macrocells, the City developed appropriate local regulations addressing the placement of macrocells on monopoles or existing private structures. These regulations are included in chapter 22.120 SVMC and provide for appropriate height limitations based upon the zone where the facility is located. There are also design standards that primarily involve stealth shrouding to minimize the aesthetic impact of the facilities. Federal law provided that cities could not effectively ban all wireless facilities through local regulations. Recent Federal law changes authorized providers to place certain facilities with public rights-of- way (ROW) and provided that cities could not preclude all wireless facilities. Additionally, the changes provided for specific timelines for local review of permit applications. Such timelines are in some instances different than existing permitting timelines under state and local law. With the recent federal changes, chapter 35.99 RCW is now applicable, as it governs placement of wireless telecommunication facilities within the public ROW. It allows cities to require master use permits for placement of wireless facilities within the public ROW. It also allows cities to require"use permits" in addition to the master use permit. It further provides that wireless facilities shall not interfere with the normal use of the public ROW and shall not interfere with the public health, safety, and welfare. Finally, it provides that cities cannot regulate services based upon content or the kinds of signals used, and cities cannot prohibit placement of wireless facilities within the City. Additionally, RCW 35.21.860 provides that cities may require site-specific charges for placement of certain new wireless facilities, replacement wireless facilities over 60 feet tall, and personal wireless facilities on city-owned structures, when such facilities are in the public ROW. Actions to date. In late 2015, the City was contacted by Mobilitie regarding placement of its small cell technology in the City's ROW. In 2016, the City joined a consortium of numerous cities in order to assist it with development of appropriate regulations. The consortium also provided education and assistance with development of draft wireless franchises. In 2017, the City was also contacted by Verizon and MCI Telecom regarding placement of small cell technology in the City's ROW. The City has been working with Mobilitie, Verizon, and MCI Telecom on negotiating a draft franchise. Additionally, the City has been developing its small cell development regulations and the Planning Commission has recommended approval of the draft provided with this packet. Draft Small Cell Regulations In developing the draft franchise and small cell regulations, City staff considered numerous factors. State and federal law prevents the City from prohibiting wireless facilities within the City's ROW. The City currently has a large number of varied facilities already existing within its ROW. These range from smaller power and light poles to large primary poles carrying lines from substations. There are numerous signs and trees throughout the ROW. Further, there are already existing power and cable boxes on the ground within the ROW. Thus, the addition of small cell facilities is not likely to create significant additional aesthetic impact. However, staff believes it is appropriate for the City to maintain some restrictions to ensure the ROW remains available for its intended use and that such facilities do not negatively impact the public health, safety, or welfare. Finally, staff was cognizant that specific state and federal timelines apply to processing of wireless facility permits, so ease of permit processing was important. Page 2 of 5 Draft Small Cell Regulations. Specific changes are discussed below. Appendix A: Definitions were added related specifically to the small cell and timeline provisions. SVMC 17.80.030: Table 17.80-1 —Permit Type and Land Use Application was modified to provide that small cell permits are Type I permits subject to the permit processing requirements of chapter 17.80 SVMC except as otherwise required by federal and state law and as subject to any applicable time periods as set forth in newly proposed chapter 22.122. SVMC 19.60.050: The permitted use matrix was modified to permit "small cell deployments" in all zones subject to the supplemental regulations set forth in newly proposed chapters 22.121 and 22.122 SVMC. Chapter 22.120 SVMC: Chapter 22.120 currently exists and governs all wireless telecommunications within the City. It primarily address macrocell and monopole siting. The proposed amendments to chapter 22.120 SVMC remove small cell services from chapter 22.120 SVMC. Further, the amendments update Table 22.120-1 —Tower Height Limitations to address the zone changes that occurred in the 2016 Comprehensive Plan Update process to remove nonexistent zones and update zone name changes as appropriate. Newly proposed chapter 22.121 SVMC: A new chapter 22.121 SVMC is proposed to govern all small cell services and facilities. • In accordance with state law, the amendments provide regulations for applying for "master use permits," which are in the form of franchises. Franchises are agreements between the utility provider and the City and are approved in ordinance form by the City Council. However, by having them as "master use permits," it allows the City to better control its ROW and ensure there are not unknown utility providers trying to place small cell deployments in the ROW. • In addition to the master use permit requirement, the deployment of specific small cell facilities requires a small cell permit. Small cell permits are designated as a Type I permit. The provider may include up to 30 small cell facility locations per small cell permit application. Small cell permit applications require: - Sites to be located with a description of the facilities to ensure compliance with design standards; - A copy of the valid franchise or evidence that it is being processed concurrently; - Elements of the small cell deployment that are "collocations" or "eligible facilities requests," which are subject to the unique review periods must be identified; - A declaration from an RF Engineer regarding conformity with applicable FCC regulations on frequencies used; - Necessary environmental checklists for SEPA; and - Evidence of authorization from other utility providers if the small cell facilities will be located on the other providers' utility poles or facilities. Planning Commission also voted to include requirement for applicant to provide evidence that the small cell facility design will not impact the structural integrity of the utility pole on which it is placed. • Small cell facilities are subject to design and concealment standards. These include: - For new poles, integration into the new pole unless technically infeasible. Page 3 of 5 - For existing poles, integrated into the existing design of the pole, with external projections limited to the greatest extent technically feasible. Vertical projections are limited to fifteen feet above the pole. Antenna and antenna enclosure size is limited to three cubic feet in volume. Planning Commission also voted to allow the use of "unified design enclosure" that contains both the antenna and equipment in one enclosure in a unit that is up to six cubic feet in volume. - External projections shall be painted a color to resemble and match the pole. - Small cell facilities shall not interfere with the normal use of the pole and shall not interfere with the normal use of the ROW. - Planning Commission voted to require that small cell facilities be located at least 20 feet above grade unless technically infeasible. - Primary enclosures shall be no larger than seventeen cubic feet except for certain metering and other equipment which may be allowed on the outside of the enclosure. - Ground based enclosures shall be buried or locked and integrated into the surroundings unless technically infeasible, shall not be located in an improved street or sidewalk, and shall not be located in a stormwater facility, including stormwater swales. -Advertising is not allowed on small cell facilities and no artificial lights are allowed, unless required by the FAA. - Small cell facilities are not permitted in public parks. - Planning Commission voted to require that small cell facilities be located at least 250 feet apart unless technically infeasible. If required to be within 250 feet, the provider is required to use a good faith effort to collocate the new facility on the pole with the existing facility. If collocation is not possible, then new facilities within 250 feet would be allowed. Newly proposed chapter 22.122 SVMC: A new chapter 22.122 SVMC is proposed to provide for appropriate permit review timelines for certain wireless telecommunication facilities. • Specifies the City must review and approve an "eligible facilities request" within 60 days of receipt of a complete application. Eligible facilities are defined under federal law and Appendix A as "request for modification of an existing tower or base station that does not substantially change the physical dimensions of such tower or base station." • Specifies City must review and process an eligible "collocation" application within 90 days of receipt of a complete application. Eligible collocations are defined under federal law and Appendix A as"mounting or installation or transmission equipment on an eligible support structure for the purpose of transmitting and/or receiving radio frequency signals for communication purposes." • Specifies that new wireless communications facilities shall be processed within 150 days of receipt of a complete application. As a note, SVMC 17.80.130 requires the City to issue decisions on Type I permits within 60 days and Type II and Type III permits within 120 days after fully complete applications are received. Washington Legislative Amendments As of the date of this RCA, no small cell bill had been passed. However, at least two bills were pending that would allow an ordinance of the sort currently proposed. Page 4 of 5 OPTIONS: Consensus to proceed with first reading at a future Council meeting; or take other action deemed appropriate. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Consensus to proceed with first reading at a future Council meeting. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Unknown, but likely not applicable as small cell facilities are privately owned, installed, and operated. STAFF CONTACT: Cary Driskell, City Attorney; Erik Lamb, Deputy City Attorney. ATTACHMENTS: 1. PowerPoint presentation. 2. Proposed small cell regulation amendments 3. Planning Commission Findings and Recommendations 4. Staff Report to Planning Commission 5. Minutes from January 11, January 25, and February 8 Planning Commission meetings 6. Written comments from Mobilitie, Verizon, and T-Mobile Page 5 of 5 SMALL CELL DEPLOYMENT Cary Driskell City Attorney, City of Spokane Valley Erik Lamb Deputy City Attorney, City of Spokane Valley March 6, 2018 City of Spokane Valley- Office of the City Attorney Background Generally, discussing "small cell deployments" in public rights-of-way. Update to City Council on February 14, 2017. Update to City Council on December 19, 2017. Extensive background on history, legal framework, and need for regulations. Planning Commission considered the proposed amendments and conducted a public hearing on January 25 and February 8. Voted 6-o to recommend City Council approval of the amendments with changes included by Planning Commission. City of Spokane Valley- Office of the City Attorney Develo Development ofproposed amendments p Contacted by Mobilitie (connected to Sprint) in late 2015/early 2016. Joined Consortium of numerous cities in 2016. Consortium arranged multiple education meetings with small cell providers. Consortium developed "model franchise" and "model development regulations." Working with Verizon, MCI Telecom, and Mobilitie regarding usage of Spokane Valley rights-of-way for small cell deployment. Developed draft City franchise and draft City regulations related to small cell deployments. City of Spokane Valley- Office of the City Attorney Existhig wireless monopole facilities vs: small cell facilities Current wireless facilities are large monopoles (also called macrocells), which are up to 150 feet tall. These act as central reception areas for wireless signals from hand held devices like phones and iPads. The farther away you get from the monopole, the less reliable the signal is. Similarly, the monopole receivers have a limit on how much data they can accept at one time. This current technology is referred to as 3G or 4G, short for third or fourth generation technology. Issues with increased data usage. Goal is to use small cell technology to meet consumer data and usage needs. City of Spokane Valley- Office of the City Attorney 1111111 _Amm, ExttTFjivireIess monopole face ities vs . small cell facilities cont . Small cell deployment would add many smaller sites that would collect the wireless signals, and then retransmit those signals to the macro cells (monopoles), which then sends the signals on in various ways, including wirelessly or through fiber. The small cell facilities currently anticipate utilizing either a fiber connection to the closest macro cell, or utilizing a microwave signal. City of Spokane Valley- Office of the City Attorney Definition of small cell facility - RCW 80.36.375 (d) "Small cell facility" means a personal wireless services facility that meets both of the following qualifications: (1) Each antenna is located inside (ii) Primary equipment enclosures are an antenna enclosure of no more no larger than seventeen cubic feet in than three cubic feet in volume or, volume. The following associated in the case of an antenna that has equipment may be located outside the primary equipment enclosure and if so exposed elements, the antenna located, are not included in the and all of its exposed e ements calculation of equipment volume: could fit within an imaginary Electric meter, concealment, enclosure of no more than three telecomm demarcation box, ground- cubic feet based enclosures, battery back-up power systems, grounding equipment, power transfer switch, and cut-off switch. • Macro vs Small Cell Cell-edge Mid-cell Near Cell Mid-cell Cell-edge Macro Site I'l I- II II Small li . —— Small Small Sma CellCell 1 Cell - - Cell • "— :,„ .• V , V ..., A - .. ii -F — — , Microcells verizoni _ "nom= Macro Site P 0 A small cells can Small Cells IC II' densify our0 r network to 0 0 meet customer 1\\N(t) 460 0 demand0 r _ Different technology, different process Macro Cell ' Ft Small Cell II 6 ft 14 Thee slid:depicts a wee Rir al repre5enraiese of Small cells and macro eeE11 The actual equipment.We—and desgn may vary. Small Cell Deployment: Simulation for Seattle (equipment in base) A.. ' r`t_ ,� /4elf,} Fluexe�Pr PLR . .. �ir£us ,,./-11 orareiRolf7141•IFG if nP.Ytl Kit it1111[♦PfAM/COME* st lli'lMm/163W' 0. .. x ,e:-" li - „_,.',....46 ... ;'=A. ti; — Po[f14P i1.4.1 . m ri'ca �n mAMOK pro Fou.`' __ _ - @k gm-rdB7 vent CmitG F Ifs L1.0ilY! .6.,comoxt { Small Cell Deployment: Simulation for Bellevue (with cabinet) far ,1,'- a. PIOTOSIMPS03' s usanxn fore: ,. • I .......4k._ ifa r" " ' t •F • . -`: • I z e � ._____i_________-_ 11,iy.,... 411:11-1‘. i:a.:7,..u':-4-am: im. - : - ii 1 L . ._ _ _ _ _______ . __. _ ....1!!"1.-6 .. nom 11-1,i x IC,W x il•6 Ws Y rizo ■ c15C1501:516:11of et matetal E.rnotG 'd to anyunat G �ca thidparks if'vritea agreemeet 13 Clearwire Microcell Application • Clearwire deployment is similar to what is required for a `small cell'on a power pole • Typically,`small cell'antennas would be smaller and battery back-up may be optional 4 , n CLEARWIRE II WA-SEA065$ �`.' j v "41 et PSE AT KIMURA 4 fi *' ei,.. , . .,, IN THE RCM ADJACENT TO t law Ne*xi ST REMICI 1.WA 911X52 r Clearwire y Antennas � f 4 k II DANGER y I � •. !.. 7 Ijl r7 . -ti, _ I 1411111011 _ H Fiber Battery Power Radio Pedestal Box H-frame Unit ®2012 AT&T intellectual PropertyAl rights reserved AT&T and She AT&T log 0 are trademarlo or AT&T intellectual property. Considerations fr nwSpokaneValleyregulations s Cannot prohibit small cell facilities within the ROW. Currently have large number of varied facilities in the ROW. Power and light poles - ranging from standard wooden up to primary poles from substations. Power and other structures on the ground. Signs. Trees. Limits on height and location (e.g., use of ROW and public health, safety, welfare). Aesthetic impacts - design standards and/or stealth shrouding? Federal and State law timing requirements. Ease of permit processing - e.g., multiple sites per permit application? Charges for new facilities when allowed by State law? City of Spokane Valley- Office of the City Attorney ca___Sp-cre Valley Small Cell Regulations and Franchises Proposed regulations and franchises establish a system and process for the City to receive applications from wireless providers to use the City ROW and to place small cell facilities within the ROW with minimum aesthetic impact as allowed by law. City of Spokane Valley- Office of the City Attorney I Note on franchises Based largely on other existing franchises. Maintains common approach to governing ROW. No fees for siting of new facilities. Don't charge other services to place new facilities. Requires franchise-holder to apply for small cell permit for each small cell facility site. Franchises approved by City Council in ordinance form. Staff will be coming forward in future meetings with draft franchises for each provider for City Council consideration. City of Spokane Valley- Office of the City Attorney Proposed Amendments Amendments proposed for: Appendix A SVMC 17.80.030 - Permit processing SVMC 19.60.050 - Permitted use matrix • Chapter 22.120 SVMC - Existing wireless telecommunication regulations • New proposed chapter 22.121 • New proposed chapter 22.122 City of Spokane Valley- Office of the City Attorney E Proposed Amendments — Appendix A Appendix A amended to add definitions related specifically to small cell deployments and the new timeline provisions. City of Spokane Valley- Office of the City Attorney w,.=, Proposed Amendments — SVMC 17 . 80 . 030 SVMC 17.80.030 amended to provide that small cell permits are Type I permits subject to the permit processing requirements of chapter 17.80 SVMC except as otherwise required by federal and state law and chapter 22.122 SVMC, which contains those different review periods. City of Spokane Valley- Office of the City Attorney Proposed Amendments — SVMC 19 . 60 . 050 The permitted use matrix was amended to allow small cell deployments in all zones subject to the supplemental regulations in newly proposed chapters 22.121 and 22.122 SVMC. City of Spokane Valley- Office of the City Attorney ProposedAmendments — Chapter 22 . 120 SV Chapter 22.120 SVMC currently exists and governs all wireless telecommunications facilities. It primarily addresses macrocell and monopole siting. Proposed amendments remove small cell services from chapter 22.120 SVMC since they will be covered by proposed chapter 22.121 SVMC. Table 22.120-1 is updated to address the zone changes that occurred in the 2016 Comprehensive Plan Update process. City of Spokane Valley- Office of the City Attorney Propose Cha pter 22 . 121 SVC New chapter solely limited to small cell deployments. Provide for "master use permits." These will be franchises. Require application or franchise approval. Provide for "small cell permits." Type I permit - reviewed and approved administratively. Deployment of small cell facilities requires small cell permit application. City of Spokane Valley- Office of the City Attorney Propos,_e • — Cha ter 22 . 121 SVM cont . Application requirements: Up to 3o sites per application. Locations identified and description of facilities to ensure compliance with design standards. • Copy of valid franchise or concurrent franchise approval being processed. • Elements that are "collocations" or "eligible facilities requests" must be identified. • Declaration from RF Engineer regarding conformity with applicable FCC regulations on frequencies used. Environmental checklists as required per SEPA. Evidence of authorization from other utility providers if the small cell facilities will be located on other providers' utility poles or facilities. Planning Commission also voted to include requirement for applicant to provide evidence that the small cell facility design will not impact the structural integrity of the utility pole on which it is placed. City of Spokane Valley- Office of the City Attorney ��. Propose4pinendrnents - Chapter 22 . 121 SVM � Cont. Small cell design and concealment standards: • For new poles, integration into the new pole unless technically infeasible. • For existing poles, integration into existing design of pole. External projections limited to greatest extent technically feasible. Vertical projections are limited to fifteen feet above the pole. Antenna and antenna enclosures limited to three cubic feet. External projections painted to resemble and match the pole. Small cell facilities shall not interfere with normal use of the pole or ROW. Primary enclosures shall be no larger than seventeen cubic feet. Planning Commission also voted to allow the use of"unified design enclosure" that contains both the antenna and equipment in one enclosure in a unit that is up to six cubic feet in volume. Planning Commission voted to require that small cell facilities be located at least 20 feet above grade unless technically infeasible. City of Spokane Valley- Office of the City Attorney Proposed Amendments — Chapter 22 . 121SVMC nt . Small cell design and concealment standards continued: Ground based enclosures shall be buried or integrated into the surroundings unless technically infeasible. Originally, the proposal was to require buried or integrated facilities to the maximum extent feasible. Planning Commission voted to use the language "unless technically infeasible." Enclosures shall not be located on improved street or sidewalk. Enclosures shall not be located in stormwater facilities. Advertising not allowed. • No artificial lights, unless required by FAA. • Not permitted in public parks. • Planning Commission voted to require that small cell facilities be located at least 250 feet apart unless technically infeasible. If required to be within 250 feet, the provider is required to use a good faith effort to collocate the new facility on the pole with the existing facility. If collocation is not possible, then new facilities within 250 feet would be allowed. City of Spokane Valley- Office of the City Attorney 2,.t_I P ro --------w----- —- e r 22 . 122 SVMC Related to federal and state mandated permit review times "Eligible facilities request" - 6o day review period Eligible facilities are defined under federal law and Appendix A as "request for modification of an existing tower or base station that does not substantially change the physical dimensions of such tower or base station." Eligible "collocation" - 90 day review period. Eligible collocations are defined under federal law and Appendix A as "mounting or installation or transmission equipment on an eligible support structure for the purpose of transmitting and/or receiving radio frequency signals for communication purposes." Specifies that new wireless communications facilities shall be processed within 150 days of receipt of a complete application. As a note, SVMC 17.80.130 requires the City to issue decisions on Type I permits within 6o days and Type II and Type III permits within 120 days after fully complete applications are received. City of Spokane Valley- Office of the City Attorney 2 5 Public Comments Extensive written comments and public testimony from industry representatives. Generally supportive of amendments. Opposed to 250 foot limitation and collocation. Opposed to buried facilities. Opposed to prohibition in public parks. Proposed "unified camouflage design" concept. Provided other general technical information. Copy of written comments included in Council packet. City of Spokane Valley- Office of the City Attorney 26 Questions ? City of Spokane Valley- Office of the City Attorney 27 CTA 2017-0005 City Council Admin Report Draft 2/27/18, DRAFT APPENDIX A — DEFINITIONS RadiolTV broadcasting studio: Facilities serving the broadcast media. See "Communication favi°ities, use category." Repeater facility: A facility for the noncommercial reception and retransmission of radio signals. See "Communication facilities, use category,' RF Engineer: A person who, in the opinion of the City Manager, has appropriate is qualified with education, training and experience in wireless communication services. radio frequencies, and FCC and other applicable governmental regulations to provide the necessary certification(s) required pursuant to chapter 22:121 S JMvMC. Telecommunications: The transmission, between or among points specified by the user, of audio and/or visual information and data of the user's choosing, without change in the form or content of the information as sent and received_ Alternative mounting structure: A water tower, manmade tree, clock tower, church steeple, bell tower, utility pole, light standard, freestanding sign, flagpole, or similar structure designed to support and camouflage or conceal the presence of telecommunications antennas. • Antenna: Any exterior apparatus designed for telephonic. radio, data, Internet or other communications through the sending and/or receiving of radio frequency signals including. but not limited to. equipment attached to a tower, pole, light standard. utility pole, building or other structure for the purpose of providing wireless services. Types of antennas include: -An 'omni-directional antenna' receives and transmits radio frequency signals in a 360-degree radial patterer, -A "whip antenna" is an omni-directional antenna that is up to 15 feet in height and no more than six inches in diameter; and -A "direct anal or panel antenna' receives and transmits radio frequency signals in a specific directional pattern of less than 360 degrees.A structure or device used-to-cahoot radiate radio, television, or microwavo oIoctramagnotic wavoc, including-directional antennas, su _ -_ -- . _ - _ _- - _ diehesrand omni directional ontcrr - et-inoludito e nth-Stations-onoracornmereial antennas inctaila-tions for home use of radio or tel Antenna Height: The vertical distance measured from average building elevation to the highest point of the antenna, or if on a rooftop or other structure, from the top of the roof or structure to the hi.hest +Dint of the antenna. For re+lacernent structures antenna height is measured from the top of the existing structure to the highest point of the antenna or new structure, whichever is greater_ I CTA 2017-01705 City Council Admin Report Draft 2/27/18 • Approved small cell facility: Any small cell facility that has received all required permits. • Array: An arrangement of antennas and theft supporting structure. • Ease Station: A s_ructure or equipment at a fixed location that enables FCC-licensed or authorized wireless communications between user equipment and a communications network. The term does not encompass a tower as defined herein nor any equipment associated with a tower. Base Station includes. without limitation: - Equipment associated with wireless communications services as well as unlicensed wireless services and fixed wireless services such as microwave backhaul, - Radio transceivers, antennas. coaxial or fiber-optic cable, regular and backup power supplies, and comparable equipment, regardless of technological configuration 'including Distributed Antenna S stems "DA ") and small-cell networks). -Any structure other than a tower that. at the time the relevant application is filed with the itv1su• 'oras or houses e.ui.mentdescribed above that has been reviewed and approved under the applicable zoning or siting process. or under another State or local regulatory review process, even if the structure was not built for the sole or primary purpose of providing that support: The term does not irclude an structure that. at the time tree relevant asilication is filed with the Cit . does notsu■+ort or house esui.ment describedabove. • Collocation: The mounting or installation of transmissio�r ep;uiprnent on an eligible su i'art structure for the our•ose of transmittin+ and/or receiving radio fre uenc signals for communication purposes.A single telecommur ldrtions tower and/or cit3 used by more than-one telecommunications service provi . • Concealment technology: Transmission facilities desi fined to look like some feature other than a wireless tower or base station or which minimizes the visual impact of an antenna by use of nonreflective materials, appropriate colors and/or a concealment canister or enclosure. • Dish: A parabolic or bowl shaped device that receives and/or transmits signals in a specific directional pattern. • EIA-222: Electronics Industries Association Standard 222, "Structural Standards for Steel Antenna Towers and Antennas Support Structures.° • Electric transmission: A self-supporting structure in excess of 50 feet in height designed to support high voltage electric lines. This does not include local utility or distribution poles (with or without transformers) designed to provide electric service to individual customers_ • Eligible Facilities Request: _Any request for modification of an existing tower or base station that does not substantially change the physical dimensions of such tower or base station. involving_ - Collocation of new transmission equipment: 2 CIA 2017-0005 City Cot iitiI Admin Report Draft 2/27/18 Removal of transmission equipment: or - Replacement of transmission equipment. • Elia ibte SU E E ort structure: An tower or base station as defined in this section, provided that it is at the time the relevant application is filed with the City, houses or supports an antenna, micro cell or sural/ cell deployment, • Equipment structure: A facility, shelter, cabinet or vault used to house and protect electronic or other associated equipment necessary far processing fireless communications signals. "Associated equipment" may include, for example, air conditioning, backup power supplies and emergency generators. • Existing: A constructed tower or base station is existing if it has been reviewed and approved under the applicable zoning or siting process, o- under another state or local ref ulato review .recess •rovided that a tower that has not been reviewed and reviewed because it was not in a zoned area when it was built, but was lawfully constructed, is existing for purposes of chapter 22.122 SViv9 . • Guyed, tower: Any telecommunications tower supported in whole or in part by cables anchored to the ground, • Height: The distance measured from grade to the highest point of any and all components of the structure, including antennas, hazard lighting, and other appurtenances, if any. • Micracells: Has the same meaning as set forth in RON 80.36.375, as now adopted or hereafter amended. • Monopole: A self-supporting telecommunications tower which consists of a single vertical pole, fixed into the ground and/or attached to a foundation_ Other SU .ort structure: A structure used to su•port small cell facilities or equipment structures. exclud ng buildings, utilitypoles, and water reservoirs. Examples of "other support structures" include flagpoles and ball field light standards_ • Panel: An antenna which receives and/or transmits signals in a directional pattern. • Prior approval: Certification of approvals front the City authorizing the initial installation of a s.ecific wireless carriers small cell facilities on a base station or tower, Prior approval may also include the subsequent approvali s} from the City authorizing modifications to the initial installation that have resulted ir, the existing state of the small cell facility including. but not limited to, the number and location of equipment structures, antennas, antenna support structures, and ancillary equipment_ • Self-supporting lattice tower: A telecommunications tower that consists of err open network of metal braces, usually triangular or square in cross-section. Service: The offering of telecommunications for a fee directly to the public, or to such classes of users as to be effectively available directly to the public, regardless of the facilities used. • Service provider: Has the same meaning as set forth in RCVV 35.99.010(6) as now ado+ted or hereafter amended, Service •rovider shall include those infrastructure 3 CTA 2017-0005 City Council Adm in deport Draft 7/27/18 companies that provide telecommunications services or equipment to enable the deployment of personal wireless services. Small cell and small cell deployment: Have the same meaning as set forth in R VV 80.36.375, as now adopted or hereafter amended. • Stealth: A telecommunications antenna that is effectively camouflaged or concealed from view. • Substantial change: A modification substantially charges the physical dimensions of an eligible support structure if it meets any of the following criteria: - For towers other than towers in the public rights-of-way. it increases the height of the tower b. more than 10% orb the height of one additional antenna array with separation from the nearest existing antenna not to exceed twenty feet. whichever is greater. for other eligible su+.ort structures it increases the height of the structure by more than 10 or more than ten feet, whichever is greater: - For towers other than towers in the public rights-ca-way, it involves adding an appurtenance to the body of the tower that would protrude from the edge of the tower more than twenty feet. or more than the width of the tower structure at the level of the a •.urtenance. whichever is 'reefer. for other eligible su••ort structures, it involves adding an appurtenance to the body of the structure that would protrude from the edge of the structure by more than six feet, - For an eligible su .ort structure it involves installation of more than the standard number of new equipment cabinets for the technoloay involved, but not to exceed four cabinets; or. for towers in the public rights-of-ways and base stations, it involves installation of any new equipment cabinets on the ground if there are no ire-existing .round cabinets associated with the structure or else involves installation of ground cabinets that are more than 10% larder in height or overall volume than any other ground cabinets associated with the structure -ft entails any excavation or deployment outside ti-e current site - it would defeat the concealment elements of the eligible sur .ort structure- or - It does not comply with conditions associated with the siting approval of the construction or modification of the eligible su •ort structure or base station equipment, provided, however, that this limitation coes not apply to any modification tat is non-compliant only in a manner that would not exceed the thresholds identified above. • Telecommunications antenna: An antenna used to provide a telecommunications service. This excludes lightning rods, private mobile radio systems, amateur radio antennas less than 35 feet in height in residential districts and 50 feet in height in nonresidential districts, and whip antennas less than four inches (10 cm) in diameter and less than 10 feet in height. * Telecommunications service: Has the same meaning as set forth in R 'UV 35.99.010(7), as now adopted or hereafter amended. 4 CTA 2017-0U05 City Council Admin Report Draft 2/27/15 ▪ Tower: Any structure built for the sole or primary purpose of suppartinq any FCC- licensed or authorized antennas and their associated facilities, including structures that are constructed for wireless communications services including, but not limited to, private, broadcast, and public safety services, as well as unlicensed wireless services and fixed wireless services such as microwave backhaul and the associated site. A lower" shall not include a replacement utility pole as authorized by a lease with the City, a franchise or a Small Cell Permit.A-self-supporting or guyed structure more th • - - _ -- e . _ _ - - - _ _ eorc telecommunications antennas- Decs not include ham operator or wind turb * Transmission equipment: Equipment that facilitates transmission for any FCC- licensed or authorized wireless communication service, including, but not limited to. radio transceivers. antennas, coaxial or fiber-optic cable, and regular and backup power supply. The term includes equipment associated with wireless communications services including, but not limited to, private, broadcast, and public safety services, as well as unlicensed wireless services and fixed wireless services such as microwave backhaul. • Unified design enclosure: Concealment of antennas and equipment withina single enclosure. • Utility pole: A structure designed and used primarily for the support of electrical wires. telephone wires, television cable, traffic signals, or iiphtinq for streets, parking areas. or pedestrian paths. Whip antenna:-A - - , - - - - nna of cyliedrical shape-which is no more than six inchc rrdiamcter- * Wireless: Having no wire or wires, operating by means of transmitted electromagnetic waves. Tower, ham operator: A structure less than 75 feet in height above grade used for two- way communication-for hobby or emergency service purposes by private individuals. See "Communication m unication facilities, use category." .5 C.TA 20 17-0 c5 City Cou ncil Ad min Report Draft 2/27/18 DRAFT SVMC 1 9.60.050 Use/Category R7 R2 R3 R4 MF1 MF2 MUC CMU GO 0 NC C RC POS11 12 Type Communication Facilities Radio/TV P R P P P F' broadcasting studio Repealer facility PPPP P P _ PPP I P °P Chaoier Smpil cell S S S SS55S 22.121 deploymEnt — — — SVMC Telecommunication Chapter wireless antenna SS SS S S S S C C S S S 22.120 army SVMC Telecommunication Chapter wireless support CCCC C C S S CCSSS S S 22.120 tower SVMC Tower, ham SVMC SSSS S S S S C C S S SH S ' operator 40 110(A) CTA 2017-0005 City Council Ari min Repoli.Draft 2/27/18 DRAFT Chapter 22.120 SVMC 22.120.010 Purpose and intent. These standards we-e developed to protect the public health, safety, and welfare, and minimize visual impacts on residential areas, while furthering the development of wireless communication services. These standards were designed to comply with the Telecommunication Act of 1996_ The provisions of this se:tiocchapter 22.120 SV1v1C are not intended to and shall not be interpreted to prohibit or to have the effect of prohibiting wireless communication services. Chapter 22,120 SVMC shall cover all wireless communication services other than small cell services which, are reyiulatecl pursuant to chapter 22.121 SVMC 22.120.020 Permits and exemptions. Where a transmission tower or antenna support structure is located in a zoning district which allows such use as a permitted use activity, administrative review, and a building permit, shall be requ]red, subject to the project's consistency with the development standards set forth in SVMC 22.120.040. In instances where the use is not allowed as a permitted use activity , a conditional use permit and building permit shall be required in addition to a demonstration of consistency with all required development standards. Exemption: Wireless radio utilized for temporary emergency communications in the event of a disaster is exempt from the provisions of this section and shall be permitted in all zones, 22.120.030 Required application submittals. All applications for wireless antenna arrays and wireless communication support towers shall include the following: A. A letter signed by the applicant stating that all applicab]e requirements of the FCC, the FAA, and any required avigation easements have been satisfied. B. A scaled site plan clearly indicating the location, type and height of the proposed tower, antennas, on-site land uses and zoning, adjacent land uses and zoning, adjacent roadways, proposed means of access, setbacks from property lines, elevation drawings of the proposed tower, the equipment structure, fencing, buffering and the type of stealth technology which will be utilized. The full, detailed site plan shall not be required if the antenna is to be mounted on an existing structure. C. The applicant shall have performed and provided a photographic simulation of the proposed facility from all affected properties and public rights-of-way. 7 CTA 2017-0005 City Council Admin Report Draft 2/27/18 0. The applicant shall provide copies of any environmental documents required by the State Environmental Policy Act ( EPA). E. The applicant shall have demonstrated effort to co-Locate on an existing support tower or other structure. New support towers shall not be permitted within one mile of an existing support tower unless it is demonstrated that no existing support tower or other structure can accommodate the proposed antenna array. The City reserves the right to retain a qualified corsultant, at the applicants expense, to review the supporting documentation for accuracy. F. Evidence to demonstrate that no existing support tower or other structure can accommodate the proposed antenna array may consist of the following: 1. No existing support towers or other structures are located within the geographic areas required to meet the applicant's engineering requirements_ 2. Existing support towers or other structures are not of sufficient height to meet the applicant's engineering requirements. 3. Existing support towers or other structures do not have sufficient structure l strength to support the applicant's proposed antenna array and related equipment. 4. The applicant's proposed antenna would cause electromagnetic interference with the antenna on the existing support towers or other structures, or the antenna on the existing support towers or other structures would cause interference with the applicant's proposed antenna. G. The applicant of a new tower shall provide a signed statement stating the applicant has provided notice to all other area wireless service providers of its application to encourage the co-location of additional antennas on the structure. H. A signed statement from the owner and/or landlord to remove the facility or obtain another permit for the facility within six months of when the facility is no longer operating as part of a wireless communication system authorized and licensed by the FCC. I. Proof that all the necessary property or easements have been secured to assure for the proper construction, continued maintenance, and general safety of the properties adjoining the wireless communication facility. 22.120.040 Design standards. The support tower, antenna array, and supporting electrical and mechanical equipment shall be installed using stealth technology. Stealth technology applies to all personal wireless service facilities, including. without limitation, antennas, towers and equipment structures. For any facility, stealth technology means the use of both existing and future technology through which a personal wireless service facility is designed to resemble an object which is already present in the local environment, such as a tree, streetlight, or traffic signal_ rt also includes: CTA 2017-0005 City Council!linin Report Draft 2/27/18 A. For personal wireless service support towers: 1. 1f within existing trees: "stealth technology" means: a. The tower is to be painted a dark color b. Is made of wood or metal; and c. A greenbelt easement is required to ensure permanent retention of the surrounding trees. 2. Stealth technology for towers in a more open setting means that they must have a backdrop (for example, but not limited to, trees, a hillside, or a structure) on at least two sides, be a compatible color with the backdrop, be made of compatible materials with the backdrop, and that architectural or landscape screening be provided for the other two sides. If existing trees are the backdrop, then a greenbelt easement is required to ensure permanent retention of the surrounding trees. 3. Antennas shall be integrated into the design of any personal wireless service tower to which they are attached. External projections from the tower shall be limited to the greatest extent technically feasible. 4. For rooftop antennas or antennas mounted on other structures: a. For omni-directional antennas 15 feet or less above the roof, stealth technology means use of a color compatible with the roof, structure or background; b. Hr other antennas, stealth technology means use of compatible colors and architectural screening or other techniques approved by the City_ E. For antennas mounted on one or more building facades: stealth technology means use of color and materials such that the facility has architectural compatibility with the building_ it shall be mounted on a wall of an existing building in a configuration as flush to the wall as technically possible and shall not project above the wall on which it is mounted. C. For equipment structures, stealth technology means locating within a building, or if on top of a building, with architecturally compatible screening. An underground location, or above ground with a solid fence and landscaping, is also considered stealth technology. D. Advertising or display shall not be located on any support tower or antenna array; however: the owner of the antenna array shall place an identification plate indicating the name of the wireless service provider and a telephone number for emergency contact on the site. E. No artificial lights other than those required by FAA or other applicable authority shall be permitted. All security lights shall be down-shielded, and installed to be consistent with Chapter 22.60 SVM , L CIA 2017-0005 City Council Admin Report Draft 2/27/18 F. The facility shall be enclosed by a site-obscuring secured fence not less than six feet in height with .a locking gate. No barbed wire or razor wire shall be permitted. G. The support tower foundations, equipment shelters, cabinets or other on-the-ground ancillary equipment shall be buried below ground or screened with a site-obscuring secured fence not less than six feet high. The requirement for a site-obscuring fence may be waived provided the applicant has secured all on-the-ground ancillary equipment in a locked cabinet designed to be compatible with and blend into the setting, and the means of access for the support tower is located a minimum of 12 feet above the ground. H. All support structures) for wireless communication antennas shall have their means of access located a minimum of eight feet above the grou-id unless the requirement for a fence has been waived. I. The support tower shall meet the minimum primary structure setback requirements for the underlying zone. J. Support towers shall not be permitted inside a public park, public monument or private holding located within a public park or public monument. K The height of the support tower or antenna array above grade shall not exceed the maximum height identified in Table 22.120-1 below_ The height of a support tower shall include antenna, base pad, and other appurtenances and shall be measured from the finished grade of the parcel. Table 22.120-1 — Tower Height Limitations Zone h- Antenna Array Support Tower R-1, Single-Family Residential Estate R-2, Single-Family Residential Suburban R-3, Single-Family Residential Urban 20 feet above the zoning R 1, Single Family height limitation or 16 feet 60 feet Rr.cidantial 1 Irban above existing structure Multifamily ResidentialeDey Residential MF 2, High Dons ty Residential Mixed Use Center (mug) - 60 feet Corridor Mixed Use (CMU) 10 CTA 2017-0005 City Council Admin Report Draft 2/2-1/18 Table 22.120-1 — Tower Height Limitations Zone Antenna Array Support Tower City Cantor (CC) Garden Offtee.(GO) C ) filen }) 20 feet above the zoning Office (0) height limitation or 16 feet Neighborhood Commercial above existing structure (NC) Community C 20 Regional Commercial (RC) 20 feet above the zoning feet higher than the Industrial Mixed Use height limitation or 20 feet maximum height allowed in the zone or 80 feet whichever is (IMU4) above existing structure less* Heavy Industrial (14) *An additional 20 feet in height for each additional antenna array co-located on the support tower, up to a maximum tower height of 100 feet, including the height of all antennas_ 22.120.050 Landscaping. Refer to Chapter 22.70 SVMC for landscaping requirements applicable to the underlying zoning district. 11 CTA 2017-0005 City Council Aclmin Report Draft 2/21/18 DRAFT Chapter 22.121 SVMC — Small Cell Deployment 22.121.010 Overview. In order to manate its ri.ht-of-wa in a thou.htful manner which balances the need to accommodate new arid evolving technologies with the preservation of the natural and aesthetic environment of the City while complying with the requirements of state and federal law, the City adopts chapter 22.121 SVMC for the deployment of small cell and macrocell technology. Service providers who seek to utilize the public right-of-way for small cell deployment in order to provide wireless communication, data transmission or other related services to the citizens of the Cit shall receive a valid franchise to .rovide the s.ecific service seekin+ to utilize the small cell de.lo •rent. Entities with franchises who wish to utilize a small cell deployment to upgrade or expand their existing services shall utilize the processes set forth in chapter 22.121 SVMC and implementing small cell permits to deploy their technology and obtain design approval of specific installations. A. Nothing in chapter 22 121 SVMC revises or diminishes the rights and obligations of an existing franchise. B. The term small cell deployment" shall include the deployment of small cell facilities. micro cells and small cell networks as those terms are defined by RCVS 80.36.375 as now adopted or hereafter amended. Small cell deployment elements which require SEPA review may utilize these processes only in conjunction with SEPA review. 22.121.015 Administration. The City Manager is charged with administration of small cell deployment permitting and other wireless communication review processes established under chapters 22.120, 22.121. and 22.122 SVMC, 22.121.020 Small Cell Deployments. A Small Cell Deployments in Rights-of-Way. Small cell deployments in the public rights- of-way shall only be made pursuant (1) to a valid franchise with the City, and {2) in compliance with all federal, state, and local small cell permitting requirements. B. Small Cell Deployments outside of Rights-of-Way. Small cell deployments outside of the public rights-of-way shall only be made in compliance all federal, state, and local small cell, permitting requirements. 22.121.030 Franchise Application, A. Franchise Application. Service providers that desire to deploy small cell deployments 12 CTA 2011-0005 City Cour cil Admin Report Draft 2177{'{S in public rights-of-way shall apply for a franchise using tie City's franchise application form and submit a fee deposit commensurate with the estimated administrative costs of processing on application for a franchise. Service providers seeking to utilize City rights- of-wa for small cell dello agents shall s.ecif .eo■ra.hic boundaries for the small cell de•lo ment described in the a•.lication and provide detailed schematics and visual renderin.s of the pro posed facilities to be utilized. Phased develoiment is permitted and an applicant is encouraged tt specify at least the initial small cell deployment in its application. B. Designation of Facilities. All applicants for franchises seeking to utilize small cel deployment shall provide the following information- Existing franchisees that seek to utilize a small cell deployment to expand. assist or implement an existing franchise may provide the information as a part of a small cell permit application for small cell deployment. The a plicant shall specify in the franchise application: 1. whether and where small cell facilities are proposed to be located on existing utility poles: 2- whether and where small cell facilities are proposed to be located on re+lacement utilit poles new Eales. towers. and#or other structures and the t .e =of replacement poles to be installed, 3. the conduit and/or ground-mounted equipment necessary for and intended For use in the small cell de.lo rnent re•ardless of whether the additional facilities are to be constructed b the applicant or leaned from an infrastructure provider; 4. an r facilit which is ek•ible for or sub-ect to the a. .licable federal review time periods under an eligible facilities re#nest or as a collocation. C. SEPA Review- Any application fora franchise which contains an element which is not exempt from SEPA review shall simultaneously submit an environmental checklist pursuant to chapter 43.21C R W and chapter 21.20 SVMC. D. Completeness. The City Manager shall review a small cell franchise application far completeness and notify the applicant within 30 days of submission whether the application is complete, provided, however, that an applicant may consent to a different completeness revieweriod. A service provider may resubmit an application determined to be incomplete within 30 days of notice by the City Manager. Failure to resubmit an application within the 30 day period shall be deemed a withdrawal of that application. No application shall be deemed complete without the fee deposit set by the City Manager. 22.12'1.04[} Small Cell Permit Application. A. Concurrent small cell permit a..lication and franchise .a,ilication, Rishts ranted under the franchise for construction. installationand placement of small cell facilities shall be implemented through_the issuance of small cell permits- The franchise application may be accompanied by one or more concurrent applications for a small cell permit to deploy small cells. 13 CTA 2017-0005 City Council Aclmiri Report Draft 2/27/18 B. Small cell permit application. A small cell permit applic.tion shall contain the following, I. All small cell facility sites shall be specified. Up to 30 sites may be specified in one small cell permit application for processing. The application shall include sufficient information about each site and facility in order for the Guy to determine that it plies the design and location standards set forth in SVIVIC 22 121 .060_ 2_ If the argil cation include_s small cell deployment in the public rights-of-way. a copy of the franchise application or reference to approved existing franchise shall be included. Ag'royal for a small cell +ermit to install a small cell de.lo rent shall be contingent upon approval of a small cell franchise or the possession of a valid small cell fra nchise. 3. If more than one application fora small cell permit is submitted by an applicant, they shall be considered in the order received.. If multiple as u[ications are submitted on the same date, the applicant shall indicate which application shall be considered first. 4. Any element of a deployment which qualifies as either an eligible facilities request or a collocation shalt be specifically designated by the applicant and may be addressed separately by the City Manager in order to comply with the applicable processing retluirerments established by federal law. state law. and chapter 22.122 SVMC 5. Any application for a small cell permit which contains an element which is not exempt from SEPA review shall simultaneously submit an environmental checklist pursuant to chapter 43.21G RGVV and chapter 21 .20 SVIVC. 6. The applicant shall submit a sworn declaration under penalty of perjury signed by an RF Engineer with knowledge of thearoposed project affirming that the small cell deployment will be compliant with all FCC and any other applicable regulations in connection with human exposure to radio frequency emissions for every frequency at which the small cell facility and associated wireless backhaul will operate. An existing franchisee applying or a small cell permit for small cell deployment shall provide an RF certification for all facilities included in the deployment 7. The applicant shall provide proof of FCC and other ;requlatory approvals required to provide the service(s) or utilize the technologies sought to be installed. 8. As applicable, the applicant shall provide written proof from any utility provider authorizing the applicant to use the utility provider's utility poles for a small cell deployment The asslicant shall also .rovide evidence of a .rofessional engineer certification or other form of formal approval that the small cell deployment meets applicable structural standards foram im acted utilit ole, C. Completeness: Small Cell Applications. The City Manager shall review an application 14 CTA 2017-U0J05 City Council Admin Report Draft 2/27/1S for comeleteness and notif the a .licant within 30 days of submission whether the ai elication is comulete .rovided, however, that an a. .licant ma consent to a different completeness review period. A service •rovider ma resuomit an ae ilication determined to be incomplete within 30 days of notice er or designee. Failure to resubmit an application in a timely manner shall be deemed a withdrawal of that application. N o application shall be deemed cam.lete without the fee de.osit set b the City Manager. D. The City Manager mar approve_ deny or conditionally approve all or any portion of the sites proposed ir the small cell permit application. 22.121.050 Small Cell Franchise and Permit Review Process. The following provisions relate to review of applications for a franchise or small cell permit for small cell depIQyrnents, A. Review of Facilites. Review of the site locations proposed by the applicant shall be governed by the provisions of 47 U.S.C. 253 and 47 U.S.C. 332 and applicable case law. Applicants for franchses and the small cell permits which implement the franchise shall be treated in a corn etitivel neutral and non-discriminator manner with other service iproviders utilizing supporting infrastructure which is functionally equivalent, that is, service providers whose facilities are similarly situated in terms cif structure. placement or cumulative impacts. Franchise and small cell permit application review under chapter 22.121 SVMC shall neither rohibit nor have the effect of .rohibitin► the abilit of an alicant to to provide _elecommunicationsseryices. B. Design Review and Concealment. Small cell facilities shall conform to design, location and concealment standards and be sub'ect to desi.n review as set forth in SVMC 22.121.050. C. Franchise a..rovel. Franchises shall be a..roved in the form of a Ci ordinance. and franchises ma onl be a•'roved b the Cit + oanil .ursuant to its standard ordinance approvaIprocess. provided however, that the City shall meet any applicable federal or state time processing requirements in reviewing and approving or denying a franchise applicatior.. D. Other conditions of approval. Approval of a franchise, small cell permit and/or other approval referenced in chapter 22.121 SVMC are conditioned on the following requirements: 1. Satisfy all applicable bulk requirements including but not limited to height. noise, lightand an other applicable zoniriig requirements. 2. Provide written proof of the approval of the owner of any utility pole for the installation of its facilities on such utili tole. A•'royal of a franchise does not authorize attachment to Cit -owned utilit .oles or other structures. 15 CTA 2017-0005 City Council Ad min Report Draft 2/20.8 Unless specifically provided for in a franchise, obtain a lease from the City or provide proof of a lease between the City and the utility owner on whose poles the a..licant is Placing small cell utilities authorizing the utilit owner to utilize the Cit 's .round lace for the installation of an new .ale a re+lacemerit utilit tole over 60 feet or to locate any new ground based structure, base station or other attendant equipment on City right-of-way or City property; 4. Comply wi_h applicable City approval processes far the co-location of facilities, utile installation of an new or replacement utility poles in the right-of-way; and 5. Comply with all City construction standards and state and federal codes when o.eratin• in the right-of-vera and obtain a re.uired .ermit to enter the right-of-wa 22.121.060 best+n and Concealment Standards. Small cell facilities shall be installed using stealth or concealment technology. Stealth or concealment technology applies to all small cell facilities, including, without limitation. antennas. towers and +rima e.ui.ment enclosures. Foran small cell facilit , stealth or concealment technolo* means the use of both existing and future technolo• through which the small cell facilit is designed to resemble or blend into an ob'ect which is already 'resent in the local environment. such as a tree. streetlight or traffic signal. It also includes: A. For those portions of small cell facilities attached to or part. of Eight, power, sign, or other poles: 1 For new poles, integrated within the pole unless technically infeasible_ New poles shall be subject to any applicable City or industry standards, 2. For existing poles, integrated into the existing design of the pale to_which it is attached, with external projections limited in size and scope to the greatest extent technically feasible, ncludinq but:not limited to being as flesh as possible to the pole., not projecting more than fifteen feet vertically above the pole, and having architectural compatibility with the pole; 3. External pr iections shall be painted a color to resemble and match the pole so that they appear to be part of the pole; 4. Shall conform to an structural standards so as not to de■rade the structural engineering of the pole to which it is attached: 5_ Shall not interfere with the normal use for which the pole is intended, including but not limited to blocking any light designed to be dispersed from existinglighting fixtures installed on light poles, interfering with power lines on power polesand obscuring any portion of the applicable sign-face on signs; and 6. i. Antennae for small cell facilities shall be located inside of an antenna enclosure no more than three cubic feet in volume or in the case of an antenna that has expcsed elements, the antenna and all of its exposed elements could fit within an imaginary enclosure of no more than three cubic feet. 16 CFA 2017-0005 City Council Admin Report Draft 2/27/18 ii. In lieu of antennae and primary equipment enclosures. unified fest n enclosures are permitted, provided that the overall dimensions of such designs shall not exceed six cubic feet in volume. iii. Antennae and unified design enclosures shall be located at least 20 feet above the base elevation of the ground unless technically infeasible. B. Primary equipme-it enclosures shall be no lamer than seventeen cubic feet in volume. The following associated equipment may be located outside the primary equipment enclosure and if so located, are not included in the calculation of eiui.ment volume: electric meter concealment telecomm demarcation box, .round-based enclosures. battery back-up power systems, grounding equipment, power transfer switch. and cut-off switch. Primary equipment enclosures shall be buried below wound or locked and integrated into the surroundings unless technical! infeasible.. _ This shall include incor.oratin• the facilities into the base of the *ole, inte•ratin• into existin• surroundins fixtures, such as garbage containers or other power boxes, and/or use of materials and colors that blend into the surrounding setting, Ground-mounted facilities shall not be located in an improved street or sidewalk. Ground-mounted facilities shall not located in a stormwater facilit includin. stormwater swales. Unified desi.n enclosures are permitted pursuant to SVMC 22,121.06C(A)(6). C. For small cell facilities mounted on one or more buildin• facades stealth or concealment technolo*. means use of color and materials such that the facilit has architectural compatibility with the building. ft shall be mounted on a wall of an existing building in a configuration as flush to the wall as technically possible and shall not project more than three feet above the wall on which it is mounted. Unified desiin enclosures are permitted pursuant to SVNIC 22.121.060(A)(6). D. Advertisin• or dis•la shall; not be located on an small cell facilit - however the owner of the small cell facilit shall .lace an identification +late indicatin• the name of the wireless service +roviider and a tele•hone number for emer.enc contact on the site, E. No artificial lights other than those required by FAA or other applicable authority shall be permitted. Any security lights shall be down-shielded. F. Small cell facilities that are not within the ri•ht-of-wav shall meet the minimum primary structure setback requirements for the underiyinn zone_ G, Small cell facilities shall not be permitted inside a public park, public monument or 2rivate holding located within a public park or public monument. H. Location. Small cell facilities shall not be located within 250 feet of any other small cell facility unless the applicant demonstrates that no other location can accommodate or is sufficient to meet the wireless service needs. In the event a small cell facili is re.uired to be located within 250 feet of another existin• small cell -axil t . the a i i licant shall make a good faith effort to collocate the newfacility+ on the same pole or structure as the existing small facilit in order to minimize im.acts from new small cell facilities. 17 CTL 2017-00US City Council Ad min Report Drift 2/27/18 The City may require applicants to larovide evidence of efforts for collocation. An applicant may demonstrate good faith efforts to collocate by providing written evidence from the other wireless provider{s)_that the are unwliling or it is technical) infeasible to collocate, or from pole or structure owners that they will not allow collocation or that it is technically infeasible to allow ccllocation. 22.121.070 Small Cell Permit and Minor Deviations. A. The City Marader shall review applications for small cell permits_for small cell derlo merits a'.roved to a franchise or small cell Permit. The Ci Manaier mag authorize minor deviation in the small cell permit from the dimensional design and concealment technologies referenced in the exhibits to the franchise or design standards where such deviation is necessa to allow the as.licant to .rovide covet-ate and where such deviation eithe' does not rnateriall differ from the Ci 's desi n and concealment standards or achieves esuivarent or better inteoration_ B. Deviations in the dimensions or volume of small cell facilities which do not exceed the cumulative total :provided by the definition of a small cell or microcell facility in RCV' 80.36.375 shall be considered a minor deviation; irovided. however that the do not defeat the concealment features set by City's generally applicable design and concealment stancla-ds. C. Small cell per-nits to install facilities including apprcvar of minor deviations shall be processed within 60 days of receipt of a complete app) cation and final aoyrova! of a franchise. whichever occurs fast. 2 .1 21.080 Significant Deviations. An re+uest for sisniicant deviations from the a. .raved small cell facilities design designated in the franchise.. small cell permit or City's design standards shall be require a conditional use .emit and shall be considered under the .rovisions of chaster 22.120 SVMC and pursuant to the timerines established in SVMC 22.122.030 and VMC 22.122.040 A sisniFicant deviation is riot a substantial change. See As.endix A of the SVMC. 22..121.090 Compliance with State Processing Limitations. Review af_franchisc and small cell permits shall comply with the provisions of RCW 35.99.030_ Applications shall be reviewed, compreteness determined and the timeframe tolled as provided in chapter 22,122 SVMC. 18 CIA 2017-0005 City Council Acimin Report Dr.sfk 2f27J18, DRAFT Chapter 22.122 SWAG — Wireless Communications and Small Cell Facility Review Periods. 22.122.010 Rugose. Con•rens and the Federal Communications Commission have a ursuant to the authority ranted b 47 U.S.C_ 253 c and ? U.S.C. X32 a re aired local ovemments to act on wireless communication facilit a'p elications within a reasonable 'eriod of time and have established time limits for local review. The Washington State Legislature has also ado+ted similar limitations under the irovisions of cha-ster 35.99 RC1 . Accordinil the City adopts the following time limits for review of a lications for ell iile facili re uests. small cell permits and other a•*royals for service 'providers of telecommunication services. 22.122.020 Eligible Facilities Request. A. Application Review. 1. Application. The City Manager shall prepare and make publicly available an application form which shall be limited to the information necessary for the City to consider whether an application is an eligible facilities request. The application may not require the applicant to demonstrate a need or business case for the proposed modification, 2. Type of Review. Upon receipt of an application for an eligible facilities request the City Manager shall review such application to determine whether the application qualifies as an eligible facilities request_ 3. Timeframe for Review. Within 60 da s of the date on which an applicant submits a complete eligible facilities request application, the City Manager shall approve the as slication unless it determines that the a. slication is not covered b this S11MC 22122.02€0. 4, Toliini of the Timeframe for Review, The 60-da review 'period be*ins to run when the complete application is filed, and may be tolled only by mutual agreement by the City Manager and the applicant or in cases where the City Manager determines that the application is incomplete. The timeframe for review of an Eligible Facilities Request is not tolled by a moratorium on the review of aor�lications, a. To toll the timeframe for incorn.leteness the Cit Manager shall irovide written notice to the a■+licant within 30 da s of receipt of the a.'plicatiion. specifically delineating all missing documents or information required in the application_ 19 CTA 2017-0005 City Council Admin Report Draft 2/27/18 b. The timeframe for review be.ins runnin• a.ain when the auulicant makes a compliant supplemental submission in response to the City iylanager's notice of incompleteness. c. olla ipQ a supplemental submission. the City Manager shall notify the aw •licant within 10 da a if the su+ elemental submission did not •rovide the information identified in the original notice delineatinu missing information. The timeframe is tolled in the case of second or subse•uent notices pursuant to the ■rocedures identified in paragraph 4 of this section. Second or subsequent notice: of incompleteness may not specify missing doc+..ments or information that was not delineate€t in the original notice of incompleteness, B. Determination that A••lication is not an Eli■ible Facilities Request. If the Cit Mana•er determines that the a*.licant's re.uest does not eualif as an eli+ible facilities request, the time periods established by the applicable state or federal law and chap tQ.er 22.122 SVMC begin to run from the issuance of the City Manages decision that the_application is not an eligible facilities request. To the extent additional information is necessary, the City lvlanager may request such information from the applica.nt to evaluate the application under other provisions of this chapter 22.122 SVMC and applicable law. C. Failure to Act. In the event the City Manager fails to approve or deny a request for an eligible facilities request within the timeframe for review (accounting for any tolling), the request shall be deemed granted_ The deemed grant does not become effective until the applicant notifies the City Manager in writing after tl-e reviewperiod has expired (accounting for any toiling} teat the application has been deemed ranted. D. Remedies. Both the a e.licant and the Cit ma brie• claims related to Section 6409 a of the Spectrum Act to any court of competent jurisdiction. 22.122.030 Collocation. Eligible collocations shall be processed within 90 days of receipt of a complete apr lication. The ilyr Manager shall notify the a licant within 30 days of receipt of an a*Ilication whether it is cant,+lete or if additional information is re•uired. The term collocation shall not apply to the initial placement of a small cell facility on a utility pole or on an other base station or tower that was not constructed for the sole or •rirnar ■ur'ose of an FCC licensed antenna and their associated facilities. 22.122.040 New Wireless Communication Facilities. New wireless communications facilities shall be 'rocessed within 150 da s of receist of a complete application. The City Manager shall notify the applicant within 30 days of receipt of an application whether itis complete or if additional information is,required. 20 CTA 2017-0005 City Council Admin Report Draft 2/270/1$ D RAFT Chapter 17.80 17.80.030 Assignment of development application classification. A. Assignment by Table_ Land use and development applications shall be classified pursuant to Table 17.80-1 below: Table 17"80-1 - Permit Type and Land Use Application SVMC Dross. Type 1Land Use and Development Application Reference - -Accessory dwelling units 19.40 Administrative determinations by city manager or designee Multiple or building official Administrative exception 1 9.1 40 Administrative interpretation 17.50.010 Boundary line adjustments and eliminations 20.80 Building permits not subject to SEPA 21.20.040 Floodplain development 21.30 Type I Grading permits 24.50 Home business permit 19.65.180 Shoreline letter of exemption 21.50 Record 1.a0 Record of survey to establish lots within a binding site plan 20.60.040 Right-of-way permits 22.130.100 Site plan review 19.130 Small cell permit 22.121: 22-122 Temporary use permit 19.160 Time extensions for preliminary subdivision, short 20.30.060 subdivision, or binding site plan Alterations - preliminary and final subdivisions, short 20.50 subdivisions, binding site plans Type II Binding site plan - preliminary and final 20.50 Binding site plan change of conditions 20.50 SEPA threshold determination 21.20.060 Shoreline conditional use permit 21.50 21 C`FA 7017-0005 City Council Admin Report Draft 2/27/18 Shoreline nonconforming use or structure review 21.50 Shoreline substantial development permit 21 .50 Shoreline variance 21.50 Short subdivision -- preliminary and final 20.30, 20.40 Preliminary short subdivision, binding site plan — change of 20.30 conditions Wireless communication facilities 22.120 Conditional use permits 19.150 Planned residential developments 19.50 Plat vacation 20,70,020 Type III Preliminary subdivision — change of conditions 20.50 � ubdivisicns — preliminary 20.30 Variance 19.170 Zoning map amendments (site-specific rezones) 19.30.030 Annual Comprehensive Plan amendments (tex: and/or map) 17.80.140 Type IV Area-wide zoning map amendments 17,80.140 Development Code text amendments 17.80.150 B, Assignment by City Manager or Designee_ Land use and development applications not defined in Table 17.80-1 shall be assigned a type based on the most closely related application type by the city manager or designee, unless exempt under SVMC 17.80.040. When more than one procedure may be apprcpriate, the process providing the greatest opportuiity for public notice shall be followed. C. Shoreline letters of exemption, shoreline substantial development permits, shoreline conditional use permits, shoreline variances, and shoreline nonconforming use Of structure review sha I be processed pursuant to the procedures set forth in Chapter 17,80 SVMC, subject to any additional or modified procecures provided in Chapter 21 .50 SVIVIC, Shoreline Regulations, including submittals. completeness review, notices, hearings, and decisions, D. Small cell permits and wireless communication facikities shall be processed pursuant to the procedures set,forth in chapter 17.60 SVMC excep` as may otherwise be required pursuant to federal and State I , in hiding but not limit:.d to 4 k.M. 1455( (Section 6409(a) of the Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012) and chapter 3599 RCW. Chapter 22.122 SVMC specifies applicable time periods for review and processing of eligible facilities requests, collocations, small cell permits, and new wireless communication facilities. DE, Except as provided in Table 17.80-1, change of conditions for permits shall be processed the same as the original permit type. 22 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE SPOKANE VALLEY PLANNING COMMISSION FOR CTA-2017-(}005 February 22,2418 The following findings are consistent with the Planning Conurriission's decision to recommend approval. Background: I. The City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plait and related development regulations have been adopted and amended and updated from time to time,with the most recent major update in December} 2016. 2, CTA-2017-0005 is a City-initiated text amendment to amend Title 22 SVMC, SVMC 19.60.050, SVMC 17.8{].030 and.Appendix A to update wireless facility regulations to address siting of small cell wireless facilities within the public rights-of-way(ROW) 3. Thu Planning Commission held a properly noticed public hearing on Iannaty 25, 2018 and February 8, 2018 and conducted :iel[borations on February 8, 2018. The Planning Coniniissicn voted 6-O to recommend approval EN modified to City Council. Planning Commission Windings: 1. Recommended Modifications The Planning Commission recommended approval oi'the proposed amendments as provided during the January 25. 2018 pubic hearing with the following modifications to CTA-2017-0005: a. Maintain a requirement for a separation of 250 feet between small cell facilities. b. Maintain the regta_nementthat if the separation is not possible,for applicants to make a good faith attempt to collocate facilities on the same pole. Ticollocation_s not possible,new facilities within the 250 feet vouid be.[lowed. c, Maintain requirement that small cell facilities he located at(cast 20 feet above grade unless technically infeasible. d. Maintain requirement for provides to bury or integrate faci[itics into surroundings unless technically infeasi blo. e. Add requirement that applicant provide evidence that the small cell facility design will not impact the structural integrity of the utility pole on which it is placed. f. Add allowance for"unified design enclosure"to allow corn bin cd antenna and equipment enclosure of up to Six cubic feet in volume in lieu of aeparate antenna amid equipment enclosures. g. tyfalw such other minor grammatical and minor corrections as recommended from public comment., 2. Compliance with SVMC 17.80.150(F)Approval Criteria a. Tile proposed text amendment is consistent with the applicabl provisions of the Comprehensive Flag. Find;ncs(s)= i. Goal ED-Ol; Support economic opportunities and employment growth for Spokane Valley. Il. Policy EI F8, Provide and maintain an infrastructure system that supports Spokane Valley's economic development priorities. Policy ED-P15: Pursue technology-based solutions that improve assistance to businesses. Findings and 3 eanarnea1 lot;o:In°Rule Spillane Vanity Planning Canamtssron FA-2i l7-eOD5 Page 1 of iv, Goal LU-U1:Maintain and enhance the character and quality of life in Spokane Valley. v. Goal LU-02: Provide for kind uses that are essential to Spokane Valley residents, employees, and visitors. vi. Cio#rl Ce-l1: Coordinate with special districts, other jurisdictions, and the private sector to effcelivciy and affordably provide facilities and services. vii. Goal U-01: Coordinate with utility providers to balance nest-effectiveness with environmental protection, aesthetic impact, public safety, and public health. viii. Policy U-P1: Promote the efficient co-location of new utilities. ix. Policy U-P2: Promote the development lopment of citywide communication networks using the most advanced technology available. x. Policy U-P5:Require the placement of cellular facilities,substations,and antennas in a manner that minimizes adverse impacts on adjacent land i;sea and utilizes existing structures. xi. Policy tJ-P6: Coordinate with utility providers to ensure that sirhtg, locating, and phasing of utility systems are appropriate for planned growth. xii. Policy U-P8: Encourage the construction and maintenance of utility, communications, and feebuurlogy infrastructure that will help attract business and industry. b, The proposed amendment bears a substantial relation to public health, safety,welfare and protection of the environment. Finding(s): The.amendment bears substantial relation to public health,safety,wekfaro and proteotiori of the environment. The amendments allow wireless telecommunication providers to locate their small cell deployments within the ROW whi[o minimizing aesthetic impacts as allowed by law, Further,the normal use of the ROW is maintained and the normal use of other utilities is maintained, 3. Conclusion(s); a. The proposed lox:amendment is consistent with the City's adopted Comprehensive Flats and the approval criteria ecrltaiiicd in SVMC I7,80.150(F). b. The Growth Management Act requires that the comprehensive land use plan and development regulations shall be subject to continuing review and evaluation by the City, Recommendations: The Spokane Valley Nanning Commission therefore recommends the City Council approve C;TA-2Ol7- 0005 with modifications specified above. Approved ti&22 day of February,20IS 4 A L I'vltche le Rasnmusst n,Clair rsr, Deanna Horton,Administrative Assistant Nehdingsanal Re urrunenta4lonsoftheSpokaneValleyPlariningL ilmjssionCTA-1(.17-UOOS 2ije2or2 COMMUNITY AND 11JJlIK WORKS B[11f,DlNG&PLANNING (w 11011111.1111\1411/12ftb STAFF REPORT AND RECO M M E WATION TO THE PLAN N I NG COMISSION CTA-2017-0005 STAFF REPORT DATE:January 2,2018 HEARING DATE AND LOCATION: January 25, 2038, beginning at 14:00 p.m., Spokane Valley City hall Council Chambers, [[0210 East Sprague Avenue, Spokane Valley, Washington 99206. PROPOSALfESCRIPT1JN: A city-initiated text amendment to '1'i€lc 22 SVMC, SVMC 19,60.050,SVMC 17,80.030 and Appendix A to update wireless facility regulations to address siting of small cell wireless facilities within the public:rights-of-way(ROW). APPROvAL,CRITERIA: Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan,SVMC 17.80.1:50, 19.30.040. SUMMARY Staff recommends approval of the proposed amendmenls to SVMC 17.80.030, SV C 19,60.050, chapter 22.120 SVMC, chapter 22.12] SVM C, chapter 22.122 SVMC. and Appendix A. STAFF CONTACT:Erik Lamb, Deputy City Attorney AL"1'AClimENT.S; Exhibit I: Proposed amendments to SVNIC 17.80.030, SYMU 14,60,050, chapter 22.120 SVMC, chapter 22.121 SVMC, chapter 22.122 SVMC, and Appendix A. Exhibit 2: Presentation BACKGROUND INI,:) 1l A'r ON 1. APPLICATION PROCESSING; SVMC Chapter 17.80, Permit Processing Procedures. The following table s iiniTnai-i cs the procedural steps for the pi opr sal_ Process Date Published Notice of Public Hearing: January 5, 2013;January 12, 2018 Sent Notice of Public Hearing to stafflagencies: January 5, 2018 SEPA- -. Routed to staff and agencies on December 21, 207 Department of Commerce 60-day Notice of Intent to December 28, 2017 Adopt Amendment PROPOSAL BACKGROUND: In order to meet recent changes it, state law and to address wireless communication providers' new teclumo]ogical net ds, the City is proposing updates and amendments to its wireless teleconini.unicaaon facilities regulations. Specifically,the proposal will address changes in federal and state law related to lining of permit processing, new '-srnal I cell"technology, new legal and business S1a1T Report ttnd Recorrigl'ie:acl{ttion CIA-201 7-0'00.5 model directions to place "small cell" technology in puhlie rights-nf way (ROW), and to update existing regulations to folly account for these changes_ His-tory Wireless Technoio y. Historically, wireless communications have been provided through antenna arrays located on private paopelty,either attached to large "monopoles:'or aa-[ached lo existing structures, such as tall buildings or water towers. Monopoles eon he upwards of 150 feet tall. The primary array is i-efenred tLr Kk.rr`-rrlad rncell"and it delivers wireless transmissions to a large area. However,ads alae gets further from the macrocell, the sigial rets weaker and bec:orn :v lees reliable_ With the advent of smart phones, there has been an exponential increase in the demand for wireless data,and the_naacrocells have limits on the amount of data they can transmit. Accordingly,wireless ielecommtiaaicall ons Itov dens have developed technology to assist with the Llan rniNS10T1 Or t1,ila from the macrocell and to boast the signal of the maacroccl I within the primary coverage area. This technolory is referred to aas''`sma i.l eclI"lechaadafopy_ it consists of smaller antennae located in various sites around the rrraerocel I. It is referred to as"small cell"because the antennae F ncrally ;are small and could fit within an imaginary enclosure of no more than lhrce cable feet. These cells are located on smaller struclures, sudi as light poles, power poles, and other smaller poles between 30-610 feet tall_ 'Ihe small cells collect the wireless signals and retransmit those signals to the rraacrocells wirelessly (which requires line of sight) or through fiber. This "backfill" boosts the capacity, reliability, and speed of the maa cro:el is for NI I eustorn ens_ Legal Framework, Since hiswrically wireless telecommunications were provided throughmaac:roeellw, the City developed appropriate local regulations addressing the plueemeni of niacrocel Is on monopoles or existing private structures. `.These regulations are included in chapter 22.J20 SVMC and provide for appropriate height litltita>itins based upon the zone where the i<icili y is located. ':'here am also design standards that primarily involve stealth stare l idi rig iii minimize the aesthetic impact of the facilities. Federal law prnvided that cities could not effectively ban all wireless facilities through 'mai regulations. Recent Federal law changes authorized providers to place certain facilities within the ROW and provided that cities could not preclude all wireless facilities. Additionally, the changes provided for specific timelines for liiu:l review of permit applications, wlmiCh ill some cases is shorter than our standard permit processing thnelines. With the recent federal c-langes, chapter 35.94 RCW is now applicable,as it governs pfacement of wireless telecommunication facilities within the public ROW_ It allows cities to require master use pemtits for placement of wWiroloss facilities within the public ROW. Il also allows + :lies 141 require "use permits" in addition to the master use permit. It further provide, that. wireless Facilities shall not interfere with the normal use of the public kOW and shall not interfere with the public health, safety, and welfare, i :partly, it provides that cities cannot regulate services based upon content 01 the kinds of signals used, and cities cannot prohibit placement of wireless facilities within the City. Additionally, RCW 35.21.860 provides that cities may require site-specific charges for placement of certain new wireless facilities, replacement wireless facilities over (.0 feel lard, and personal wireless facilities on city-owned structures, when such Facilities are in the public ROW_ efcl/'crns to dale. In late 2015, the City was contacted by Mobilitie regarding placement of its small cell technology in the City's ROW. In 2016, the City jsiinert a consortium of numerous cities in order to assist it with development of appmpriaLe regutatioarse The consorthun alto provided education anti assislarice with development of drat wireless franchises. In 2017, the City wan also contacted by Verizon and MCI 'l elceom regarding placcinerrt of small cell technology in the City's ROW, The City has been working with Mobilitie,Verizon, and MCI Telecom onnegotiating aa draft franchise ivhercian the City will authorize their use of the ROW ('or inch utiliities, Additionally, the City has been developing its small cell development regulations, Page 2 of 6 51ail Rc. urt turd Recoil neldation CTA-2017-0005 Drrrf t Swan Celt 1fe i fri ions In developing the drti 0.small cell regulations,City stall-considered numerous Factors. State and federal law prevents the City from prohibiting wireless facilities within the City's ROW. State law further defines small cell technology as personal wireless services facilities that have = antenna ii an enclosure of no more than three cubic feet in volume and with a primary equipment enclosure of no larger than seventeen cubic feet in volume, with sonic pieces of equipment allowed outside of that enclosure. The City currently has a large number of varied facilities already existing within its ROW. These range from srnui er power and light poles to large primary poles canyirag lines from substations. There are numerous signs and trees throughout the ROW_ F'irilicr, there are already existing power and cable boxes on the ground within the ROW. Thus,the addition of small cell facilities is not likely to create s_gtulicant add ilinnal aesthetic impact. Ilowever. staff believes. it is appropriate for the City to maintain some restrictions to ensure the ROW remains available for its intended use and ilial.such facilities do not negatively impact the public health, safety, or welfare. Finally, staa ff was cognizant that specific state and federal liiiiclirres apply to processing of wireless facility permits,so ease ofpennit processing was impoltail. Draft Smca/ Rwthroo r t.s_ Specific changes are discussed below. Appendix A; Definitiom were added related specifically to the small,cell and timeline provisions. .SVMMC I7_80.1030: Table 17.80-1 --Permit Type and LandTFse App:ication was modified to provide that small cell permits are Type I permits suNect to the permit processing requirements of chapter 17.80 SVMC except as otherwise required by federal and stale law and as subject to any applicable time periods as set forth in newly proposed ;l mp10-22,122, SVMC 19.60.050: The permitted use matrix was modified to permit"small cell deploymenks"in all zones subject to the supplemental regulations set forth in newly proposed chaplers 22,121 and 22.122 SVMC. (_h apter 22.120 SVMC: Chapter 22.I20 currently exists and governs all wireless telecommunications within the City. lit primari ly rxldress inacmeell arid monopole siting. 'l'he proposed amendments to chapter 22,120 SV MC remove sinal] cell services from chapter 22,120 SVNIC. Further, the amendments update Table 22.120-1 `Power Height Limitations to address the zone changes that occurred in the 2016 Cumprehe ive Plan Update process to remove noxnesislcra runes and update zone name changes as appropriate. Newly proposed chapter 22.121 SVMC: A new ehaaplcr 22.121 SVMC is proposed to govern all small cell services and facilities. - Iti accordance with state law, the amendments provide regulations for applying for "master ui permits,"which are in the form of Franchises. Franchises are agreements between the utility provider and the City and are approved in ordinance form by the City Co unci I. However,by having them as"masher use permits," it allows the City to better coniroi ins ROW and ensure there are not unknown Wilily providers trying to place small cell deployments in the ROW. ▪ In addition to the master use permit retpuirement, the deployment of specific small cell facilities requires a small cell permit. The provider may include up to 30 small call facility locations per small cell permit application. Small cell permit applications require: - Sits in he located with a description of the facilitie to ensure compliance with desip standards: A copy of the valid franchise or evidence than it is being processed concurrently; -Elements::of the.small cell deployment that are"colloetflions"or"eligible facilities requests," which arc subject to the unique review periods roust be identified; -A declaration from an RI Engineer regarding conformity with applicable FCC regulations yin 1`i`c lncxiCirrs used; P gc301.6 Staff Report and Re ummendaalion #'.•I.1/-2017-0005 -Necessary environmental checklists for SEPAL and Evidence of authorization from other utility providers if the small cell facilities will be located on the other prop ders' utility poles or facilities. ▪ Small cull facilities are subject to design and concealment stz.ndards, These.include: -For new poles, inlek,pition into the new pole unks., technically infeasible. -For existing poles, integrated into the existing design of the pole;, with external projections hFTlited to tile greatest exlesil weliroicallyfeasible. Vertical pr€icctionsare limited Lofittccii rest above the pole. Antenna and ante:n is enclosure size is limited In three cubic feet in Voltir mc. -External projections shall he painted a color to resemble and match the pole, Small cell facilities shall not interfere with the normal jse;Of the pole and shall not int etrcre 'Mill the normal use of the ROW. - Fri mary eiaciosures shall be no larger than seventeen cubic feet except for certain metering and other equipment which many be allowed on the outside of the enclosure. Ground based enclosures shall he hurled or locked and integrated into the surroundings to the maximum extent feasible.,shalI not be located in an improved street or sidewalk,and shall not he located in a stormwater fici Illy, including stormwater swaJcs_ -Advertising is not allowed on small cell lac iliLicw and no artificial lights are allowed,unless required by the 1-'AA, - Small cell facilities are riot permitted in public parks_ Newly proposed chapter 22.122 SVMC: A new chapter 22,T22 SVMC is proposed to provide For appropriate permit review liniclincs for certain wireless telecommunication facilities. • Specifies the City must review and approve an"eligible thicilil.ie:s request"within 60 days of:roue ipt. of a complete application, Eligible facilities are defined under rederai law and Appendix Al as"request for mock Iic atioil of an existLig tower or base StaLloal that does not substantiafly change the physical dimensions of such tower or base Mali nn " • Specifics City must review and process an eligible "co]lcoc Lion" application within 90 days of receipt of a complete application_ Eligible collocations arc defined under federal law and Appendix A as "mounting or installation or transmission equipment on an eligible support :structure for the purpose of transmitting and/or receiving radio frequency signals for col imam ica_ion purposes." • Spcci lies that new wireless Qom intali call MIS facilities shall be processed within 150 days of Nee ipt of a complete application, As za msec, SVMC 17.130.130 requires the City to issue decisions on Type T permits within 60 days and Type II and Type Ill permi Is within 120 days after fully" complete applications are received. A, I I DINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECTFliC TO THE MUNICIPAL CODE TEXT A1i4ND111ENT I. Compliance with Title i7(General Provisions) of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code a. Findings; SVn+IC 17.80.150(F)Municipal Code Text Amendment Approval Criteria e The City may approve Municipal Code Text amendment, if it finds that (1) 'l he proposed text amendment l ins consistent with the applicable provisions of the Comprehensive Plan; Pare 4 of fi Stall-Ropurt rand Recommendatioli CTA-20 7-Ol)ti . Staff Annlysi : The proposed amendment.is supported by the Comprehensive Plain arae is consistent with the followilrg i;oal.s and policies: God( Ela-Ol: Support economic opporlunilies .arid employment growth for Spokane Vatley_ Policy ED-I'8. Provide and maintain an infrastructure system that supports Spokane Va.ley's economic development priorities. Policy ED-P15: Pursue technology-based solutions that improve assisixIce [o hu5inesse<s. Gael Ll_1-[ Y: tvlaintain and enhance Ilse character and quality of life in Spokane Va.ley. Goal LIJ-G2; Provide for land uses tlktl are et-senlial to Spokane Valley residents, employees,and visitors. I ct al Cli-Ci1. Coordinate with special districts, other jurisdictions, and the private sector to effectively and of fordahly provide facilities and services. Goal 1.3r01: Coordinate with utility priwidern to balance cost-effectiveness with environmental protection, aesthetic impact, public safety, and public health. Policy ll-P1: Promote the efficient co-luc<alion of new utilities. Policy LI-P2: Promote the development of citywide rxirrirminication networks using Ole mRcil.advanced technology available, Policy LI-P57 Require the placement of cellular facilities, substations, and antennas in a mai iner that minimizes adverse impacts ren adjacent ]and uses and uliliz.es existing structures. Poiley 1.1-l'6_ Coordinate with Wilily providers to ensure that sizing, locating, and phasing of utility sys.lr:mras arc appropriate for planned p`owth. Po icy IJ-P8: Encourage thae cosiroc Lion and maintenance of utility,coriintunications, and technology infrastructure that will help attract business and industry. (2) The proposed amendment bears a substantial relation to public health, safiiy, welfare, and protcclion cif the environment; Mali Analysis: The amendment bears si LE .staratial relation to public health, safety, welfare and protection of the environment. '1'lie amendments allow wireless telecommunication providers to locate their small cell deployments within Itrc FW)W while minimizing aesthetic impacts as allowed by law. l-nether,the normal use of rile ROW is maintained and the normal use oJ`s.ther utilities is maintained. b,. Con clusion(s): 'fine proposed text amendment is consistent "i l I'! the approval criteria contained in the SV MC_ 2, Winding and Conclusions Specific to Public Comments a. Findiin.gr; No public caanmc:nlss have been received to date, b. Cori elu sinri(s): h7 the absr:r ee OrpuE)llc comments,staffmnake-s no conclusions_ i'a e5n.f SUE %and Recommendation CTA-20 I 7-0005 3. ConclusionsFindingand Specmcto Agency Commt m Finding Nu a&e«y comments been received to date. k C aGi, ! m the absence ofagencym nt ,2ah'miks nu m on& B. OVERALL CONCLUSION The proposed code text amd enti consWent with @e Comprehensive Plan policies and g,R C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff remm ds that Planning Commissionrcommcndp¥o al of the code text amendmenim City Cil with or withoutcha PagLt 6 Ura MlfR& N Spokane Vniley Planning Conunissioir Couircil Chambers City Hall Jan Wiry 11,2018 I. Viae Chair Johnson called the meeting to udder at 6:02 p.m, Commir~,:ienera,sluff and audience stood for Clic pled,c of allegiance, &dietary Deanna Horton took roil and The frIlnwing members and slaff were present: James Johnson Iirilc Lamb,Deputy City Al homey Danielle Krtaelonilter absent excused Lori Barlow,senior Planner Tim Ka[lcy,absent,excused Marty Palaoiuk,Rumor Mike Phillips Henry Mien,Engineer Michelle Res/rumen Ray Wright,Senior Traffic Engineer Suzanne lxlalh s ti Lorin Manta,Senior F ngincering Manager Matt Walton Rod Higgins,Mayor Deanna Horton, Secretary for the Commission II. AGENDA:Ctjmmissiomeu Rasmussen moved Io accept the January 11,2018 agenda its presented. The vole noir the motion was five in f iwcrr; a;v egtilfiisl nodi the motion passed ifL TellN[JTT.Si Commissioner Ittsnsussean moved to approve the December 14, 2017 Intrriiles as presented. The vole mil flee motion isrus five Miami:,i, zero wine. (/w nimble pants, IV, COMMISSION IMPORTS:The COM miss ihers had no reports. V. ADMMISTRATIVl 1fl i'OItT: "Reeler Planner Lori Barlow noted Danielle ICasehtnitter lied been appointed to the Planning Coinrnisslon to glace Heather Graham of the January',2018 City Council meeting. She also sh:lrM the advanced agictiCh Ywlth tho Ctrwnii ;rioilers and discussed upcoming subiects which will appe,ir before thee!: Colnpreltenakee Llan anit9itdineni8 and n text atr1Gnd1i1 I1E to change the ene Here requirement for animal keeping back to 40,000 square feet which was changed to the update to the deveLopment regulations. �r 1� VI. PUBLIC COMMENTi Rod Higgins, Spokane Valley Mayor—Mr. Higgins thanked the Coinnilasioaers for n job well clone last year. He said he had heard the C0411111iSSioiucrs !cit they might hitwss been miderworhed, hilt hi assured them their mimic'',was very important. lb Algid the job of the Commission is to semen things for the City Council and It makes lhehr j obs easier. He commented that lately the Council has followed the recommendations of the Planning Commission,which fudicalcs they have done a thorough job. COIVIMISSIONIlLl IiYESS: Tectinn of Officers: Secretary !cants ilort it reminded the Conreiiis°eimi Ihai tinly Commissioners who had served more than ono year would be aligiblo to serve as the Clinic or the Vice Chair of the Commission. Ms. Horton then r:fllled tiir norninatinlas for The office of Chair, Mr. Phillips nominated Ms. Rasmussen, who accepted the nomination, Ms. Rtlsmurrsc+rt nominated Mr.Johnson, he declined the nomination. I laving no other noiniF !tions voting by H show of hands, four in favor and one against, Ms. Rtasirntss'en di;seuiling, M . Rui intiRRr.ii was voI d to the office of Planning Commission Chair for 201IL Ms. Horton then occepted norninatinris for the position of Vice Chair. Mr.Phillips nominated Mr, Johnson,who aixepted the nomination. I'invileg no other nominations,,voting by it show of hum's, five hi favor and sero against,Mr.Johnson was elected to the position of Vice Chair for 20111. Ms, Rasmussen then continued to lead-the meeting. ii. Plnnoing Commission Findings of Cruet fisi'CTA-2017-00031 A propose! iettlenilmuttt In tire Sp OrmeVrilley Municipal Code regarding subdivision genet !provisions. 20111.ol-IINanning CommissiarrMinutes Page 2of Planner Marty i'alauJukexplaitred lite Findings of Fnet had been dialled basad on the recolrtrnelirlccl changes the Planning Commission had voted on nt the public heading and then incorporated into the amendment to moue forward in the City Council. Commissioner.Jori tsori mum,ir1 approve floor F1rriiii rP CnwmmmiAc!ra a 171 itfrags of!WI.JreCr4- 201I7-fJ f13, The lkote ora faro ni tipr+hi+atfikl in f a r i;z+rr•n against, ;notion f?arrcct. Public Hearing,Street Standards update Cloth l(rhsinuysen apelled the piiblik li iii lg ut 1:17 p.k1L Engineer Henry Allen explained the City's Street Standards,which are the Etondards that guide the development of',kik end private in&asiruclnre, Mn Allen oxplained lite changes to the Street Standards were initiated to address the redetil lliglhway Administration's concern regarding Chapter 14.2.1 and the City's ability to maintain a sidewalk if the property owner silo LIlcl fall hu clo so, The Skeet Standards shoe also icing updated to eliminate City positions which Pica longer•exi.iit and change them to refer to the City Manager,who has oltirnale authority but dralegaites it to other staff members in the City to periform. Santo or the other changes include eliminating the vorit+rico process, FAA and Mylar record drawings, no !auger requiring streets to connect to Altura development, frontage improvements only where a prujeci accesses a street. Chapter 3 is being updated to allow limited Millie impact analysis for SFPA ltllill areas. There arc also proposed changes to the 'Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) 20.81 .010 and n.130 to remove referenees to Rite rc acquisition areas and revise SY d+1C22,f30to replace eliminated positions. Commissioner Rasmussen questioned why on page 3-14 which refercutccs collision history; the word 'past'was being struck. Senior Traffic.Engineer Ray Wrig1-1 explained the City provides the collision history to the outside engineers when they aced to doe traffic analysis and the City always provides the.most current information, She also noted that on pege 6-3 the word`dusts' needs to be changed lea cuts,on page 1-2 heck pted is in!he sentence twice. Chair Rasmussen then open the hearing up for the public to comment. Vicki Donahue,323 S Bowclish: MB,Donahue slated she lines al the intersection of 411 Ave and • flowdish Rd. 'I lois is a busy intersection and there are many eceidehits which occur there. She is also concerned about the school children walking along these roads. She feels there should be a baffle control device at this intersection, stowing people on llowdlslz, Improving 4'"Ave. She oho stated she Iliad received a letter regarding snow removal. She said they shovel hut then the plow comes gang and puts the,it righl back on the sidewalk. Paul Taylor,323 S.Bawd lib: Mr.Taylor said the leaves end the gutters did cool get dunned coca along the road, so when the NOM irmllaq there is no place for The water to go. lie coinrnotited iherc Is too rrrtr::h !tui :tin thud{I uw,,l air road, it RIAX19 u sataty control devive. I•le surd it is IA can we have It, It is do something about It. Seeing no one else who wished to testify,Chair Rasmussen closed the public hearing at I;37 p.m. Commissioner Smtihos stand Kiie could ace the Crinhhhhchhtci's point of view because 4111 Avenue is busier till ilia tits . She would like In see more stop lights along it. She ,said +I'1'Avenue is how cveiymthc avoids Stsrngue,but with all the apartments along it ncW,it is daarhgerous. C:orrtiu isRiofer Johnson triad lie agreed regard Mg Avenue. Commissioner cr Philips commented 14.1 says the City is not responsible fur maintenance of the sidewalks. H.e commented he has a problem with a eifit.cii Wiring tv replace tire sidewalk if it becomes damaged. He feels it should he pull of the City's maintenance program to repair the sidewalks,especially if they are inside the rig#it•of--way or a border easement. He fell maintenance should he explained better. 1 le also coin merited the hos n problem with shoveling the sidewalks and then Ilse plow comes along and piuls the snow the+cic and the City turning around and fining someone licionegvthere is dhow on titer sidewalk, fils, Barlow reminded fie Commissioners the mason for Me change in the language in this section is due to tim comments received from ilie Federal Highways AtiminisiraiiEon mod without il,II could affect the City's ii ility to reeelwaa wants in the future. 34 tla nI-I t P6ani:lug C ciiimission Miawes Taiga:3 el'4 Mr. Allen stated dont'srliuir the Street Standards were adopted, tlicy spoke to many jurisdictions regarding the care of Nidewitlkti,and the idea of citizens iiiaintaiaiatg the sidewalk in front of their homes or luminesces is net iliiique to our City, 'rho City inhe ikd this language from Spokune County but many ruler jurIsclietinits lit and around the state hive the sante rev ircinent, it would lac n huge expense olid runlet.inking fur the City to have to maintain hundreds of miles ofsidowellc, Commissioner Wilton. confirmed lige snow shoveling wits not In the Street Stiindards but was a separate ordinance from what was currently being considered.nsidered. 1•le wondered how the expense for repairing or repiac ing a sidewalk was delevrainuct Mr.Lamb explained the City is required to get bids for its phi projects and required to accept the,Iuwu-t bid. Based on This, the eitiren would only he billed for the actual work and we would 111/1Vd un Invoice for the work which was perforated, Commissioner Phillips Telt that rriaintenatnce was not dearly defined in section 10.1.1. Coin iiss[esicr lobiison stated that he also felt it did not clearly define mai itemmi a however fell chaingirig it might be better handled,iii a future update, Mr. Lamb offered Badding to the end et'the neiiteiicc 'prnperty owners arc responsible for the maintenance of these reantrus rix d n:J'ibed h dew,r The Commissioners agreed this change would satisfy brei r concern R. `r ntniSSIOnei'Johnson moved to ammo.to xfa reamivaasiided cdaariga.e to the municipal code a dtfieS5pit}kane Valley Street S4i air( id, ruproposed riwlththpefofllwingchwr,gleS, Street Standards scram itk2.1 changing the seconid aria ioixce of the seem' paragraph by adding 'as described below'to than dared ofthe areralteaic'e,Simla Standards rcciilon1.12,tilirdbuclle€teiaastampu,public facilities meet fwd of service standards adopted In the C'oanprehetulre Pleat, STMC 22,130 (have Fir.vedvprnral Service's senior h idginaer to t:'dip Manager. llac vi to on the motion was jive rii fivrii; aero twine, flee motion paawn'. iv. study Session—Vi/ii*s5 Small Gell Technology Deployment; Mr. Leib gave a presentation to explain to the Commission wh'e css small cell lechnolegy, Most wireless cell phone traffic is currently handled by the large iiiotinupoles. Historically the City has only dealt with the monopoles which have been located on privaalte property. The City was contacted by u Moitilitm, company connected with Sprint, regarding small cell sites in brie 2015/early 2016, The City joined u consortium of numerous cities in 20I6 to hemline more educated in W/1 et till) small cell technology Is and how it will affect us. The consortium idaeveloped `modal frimchise' njo'ceniee to and 'model development regulations' for the deployment of a:moll cell sites. The City harp heen wcukiug with Vcrizon,MCI Telecoeri,and Mobilise regirding the use of Spokurle Valley rights.ofway for small cell deployment. The City Inas developed draft fiautchlse agreements end initiations rotated to small cell deployments. Current 3 or 4C;(generation)technology is when n hand held device communicates with the large monopole. The farther you get fmm the nronepole the teas reliable slit: signal Is, Monopoles gain. only accept so much dela at one time. Small cell teelmeio ,,would be adding antennas la the r iglit- of-Wiays and hells to bring data from tilrthe r out to the larger monopoles. Federal law changed to set spccitic timelines for proccsshtg these small call parmits. There are also laws in puree which stop cities from prohibiting small cell deployment. State low allows the City to require it iii aster use permit,the City is using frairre anise agreements as these master permits, Cities Bras allowed site specific permits for the anuli cell installations in addition to the muter penults. The tele comet hutustry cannot interfere with the normal use of the rights-of-way. Cities cannot regulate aervicts eased on content or kind of sigriads,cannot prohibit placement of wireless facilities within the clty. Since the City does not own uny of the lighting€ixtarca in the right-oat= way,the cell providers have been signing agrecntwtilri wills eaich o f the power providers to ase their facilities. The City is expecting n small eell to be ilii antenna of no more than three cubic feet in volume and the equipment box would he itio large r than seventeen cubic rect. Mr.Lamb shared pictures of what it wan posg[b1e: fur the anutll call deployment to look like. The City can restrict the height, based 2111N-01-II Pinning Coamissini MNinnsir Page 4 odd on zoning location. irnpos+1 same design sltltmdnids which might Ioelu 1c mtcallh slrrotading requirements and landscaping for some facilities, Mr. Lamb explu[Led tiro proposed amendments'. ▪ Appendix A, Tadd definitions minted specifically to small cell dcploymwtts and tiie new tl w:ardc provisions. + SVMC 17.80.030 add that stnall cc11 pomiils aro a Typo T permit and shall he peaec”ed es such,cxcepi es otliorwlsa required lay federal end state law, • SVMC 191.60.050 amend the pounitted use tnairlx to allow small cell deployments iii all 7]ncH sutijecl to the suppteniental regulations proposed In new clmapteis SVMC22.121 and 22,122 ■ SVMC 23.120 remove mmmdy references to small cell surview • SVMC 22.121 new chapter providing for tlotester use porinlas, deployment of small cell facilities, and lays out the permit application requirements and small sell dei gti and m:vncl alni cnt standards. • SVMC 22.122 new chapter paw tailag for mandated permflreview lives as slaved Instate or federal regulations, Commissioner Johnsons asked who would be responsible if one of the gitess Ways damaged. Mr. Lamb stated it would be dandled just as if it was n power pale or a mull box in the nighl•of-way. Commissioners asked if providers wontdi be required to.co-locate on time snow pole, Mr, Lnanh Mid providers would have to prove that the only place they can provide services is whet they want to locate their equipment. Commissioners raised concerns regarding: • the ite slh±Bois of hawing more equipment in the rights-dal-ways. • how close together facilities would needs to be heisted,if lhuy could taut o-10 ate. • irthey w re wide band or inirrow bend facilities. ■ what would the fvenlaeney tie to honeybees,animals and people. ■ Iltia;vas wvould damage the sites for wiring. • radiation from lire aign els beistg given off these lowered antennas. • the nbilily to determine what they deployment will leek like,. Mrs Lamb trhd i1 the public healing for the snaiail colt deployment wmm.s scheduled for Jarttucay 25,2018. He would do his best to try and brim answers by the put lle hearing. VIH. GOOD OF TEE ORDER: Commissioners congratulated Commissioner Rasmussen oil nor appointment to the office of Chair and wished her luck. 1X. AD.i[14JRINTIViINTI€omrsiissioner Johnson moved to adjourn the meeting at 8:12 p.m. 1Y1e vole on 11w Nioliuzr lyvis togiol'i►rom infavor, 11w motion paned. fes Michelin Rasmussen,Choir unte signed lc/intim 1_) Deanna Horton,Secretary APPROVED Minutes Spokane Valley Piauutiug Comtnissiran Council Chambers--City hall •Tnrruary 25,201a L Chair Itugauu oncaltudtlrenteetingtoorderat6102 p.m. Cttnatrtisslnitet's,station ftrd[CJRCe signal cul` the pledge eal'atilcglaitcc. Secretary Deanna Horton took roll and The following members surd sla3fwcrc present: James Johnson Erik l iunb,Deputy City Attorney Danielle LisLhinitt r Lori Barlow,Senior Planner Tiur 1CaGllgy Koury Allen,Er'iglateet Mike Phillips Michelle Rasimussen StIZAItTatl.Mathes Man Wallell Mary Moore, OffleeA1sshtant Deanna Hotton, Scerctary for the Commission IT. AGENDA! Commissioner Johnson moved to ae epl the Jananrry 25, 2015 agenda as presented. The Vote a'ax#fhp wagon;Pm z8ven IiilbV01".MY)a galirc/0710 i!w ra al on passed. DI MINUTES:S:There were no minutes to approve. IV. COMMISSION REPORTS: '11 in Como'i sslonclr had no repots. V. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT: Administrative Assistant Ocarrnar Ronan ii troduecd Office Assistant Mary Moore. Ms.Hutton explained Ms..Moore would ht s>uidowing,her in order to he alike to learn the process oftekingcare of the Planning Commission in the case ofsbcJa neer in the future. VI. 1'C1J L1C COMMENT:There was n ra public comment. VU, cOMMTSsTON DUSJ SS: I. Planning firdluigs of Feet for CTA-2017-0004,Proposed updates to the Spokcilaii Valley Street standards and the Spokane Volley Municipal Code. Engineer Henry Allen explained to flag Commission the Findings have been drafted based on recommended changes the Pluming Commission had voted en at the public bearing and then incorporated inlo the nanarndntertt to move forward to the City Council. Coma/tufo/mt.gnat races moved to otlplui+c the Planning Commission Fincfixags of Fact for OA- 2017-01.104. A- 2fl17O1I1 h. 7lre.-Pofe on the motion was seven in favor. were r 's% and the mot fon paned. IL Public Bearing,CTA-2*i7.2OO+,A proposed a ru nuautot to Spakrine Volley hluu>riripnl Codas (SVMC) Title 22, SVMC 19.60.450, ;;VMC 1/.101.030 unit Ap1ieudlx A to update wireless fnel ity regulation's to Todd peas siting of small rell wireless fnetlitios wltlriir the putallc rights-t f- wny. Deputy city Altai noy lirik Lamb gave a preseniatian to the Commission regarding the wireleihx 51=11 call tech tatogy. Mr.Lamb explained be would try to answer some oir the questions which he received Boni the study session,and there were representatives ntativ from some orthe carriers in the uudienee prepared to give testimony:As well as attempt to aryswer some of the questions the Commissioners had. Mr, lamb requested the Commissioners hold their gtic§tions oaten after his presentation In order for ilteni to he part or Ihe record He then a3,xplralneil mos!,tint!'kettle is lulLadled by the large monopoles called macrocells. The farther away fmm the in rictooell a device gets,the weaker the signal gels. Small cell deployment is moving smaller raniterinns to power mud Hato proles which are already looted in the right-of-way. Tilt se ate called rnierecells, Some of the using the Planning Commission should consider Awn:eviiewi rug the Isrralraxvccl regulations are there are currently tt large number of varlott fticiliiies located in the City's r'iglats-of-way. Some of these ore power poles, light pules, power mid other structures on tic ground, signs, and trees. The Commission can consider limits on height,aesthetic 1nipacts designslanilaarnls andfer steuhis adu,uudlug, 2O0-OJ-25 Lomnniminn?lltiutbs t'eige.2 uI'S Mi.Lamb explained the proposed ninenitincnis; ■ Appendix A, adding definitions related sl cifictdly to small cell deployments and the uuew timeline provisions. • LV1V1C 17.80.11:30 addingtlirat srila[I stall pet in sire}u Type l pssrmii and Anil be pi r ed os such,exec pI ns mullet vise Moira by fcc[Crual and slti1a taw. • SVMC 19.60.0511 amending the peimittesl use mairix to allow small cell deployments in all zones subject lo the supplemental tegulaLions proposed in new eheplers SMC 22.121 and 22.122 • SVMC 12.120,generally addmssed large pole iilslallatiiolis. lire large:pole utleployrnenls were lett in tills ddaapter and any retb MRCS to small Bell services pee removed, ■ SVMC 22.121 is anew chapter providing for small cell deployments, II provides for Horsier use permits,which the City has determined will he our franchise agreement.Rua provider%vitt sign a ffanchise up-cement which is approved by the City Council. Small cell deployment permits fur small cell facilities for up to 30 sites al one lime and the requirements for each permit. The provider must have a franchise agreement with the City and the provider they are proposing to place be small cell on. This also lays out any design and concealment standards, For new poles,ii mast he integrated into the new pole. For existing poles,integration into the pole as much possible:. It is beitti;proposed the antenna a not extend more than 15 feet from the lop of the poo,and Bailod to three cubic teL The equipment box en the ground cannot be larger than I?cubic feel, Unless urnfeasiblea,the ectuipment must Ire brined hi the ground or integrated into the surroundings. Cannot he located on an Improved street or sidewalk or in. stormwnter facilities. They are not allowed in public parks. • SVM iC 22.122 is a ae w chapter providing for mandated pemill review times as staled in state or federal Ngulations, if the City fails to meet the timing requirements then the permit is deemed approved, Mr. Lsrrrb said he would try and answer some of the questions which came from the study session, Sonic wiiieli algin be mere v:0111110 1.1 he would defer to the providers wishing to testify. • • Could there be a required distance limit heaven new sites? The legal Hideo felt ibis might work, but There was some question as to whether this would not be competitively neutral because II would benefit whomever came joie to the area firs[, Smaril cell Tinges is limiiecl, between 5{1D-IAO feet. Forcing an additional spacing retltrireiltient could creole an impact arrr them providing their service. * Could !here be a requirement for co-location on one pole? From a legal standpoint it could be required,from a pm ctietil slandpoiat the poles are not very big and there is a sweet spot in range where the sins ll cell needs to bu stied,if the utility provider even allows more than one provider on a pole,which snow will not aaTlnw. Re said he noted most other cities are nut requiring cra- location. • Could there be o requirement ns to how bigb the antenna liar.to be located onraw grounds-The legal oft c e feels it would be a qualified yes. Unless it began to impact the technology, it has been suggested that 20 feet would be a goad height,most want to be higher than this, and it keeps it flnin interfering in Waffle and pedestrians. • Could there be a requirement to bury the ground based facilities? Yes, it would he required. However,there could be limitations to this. There could be limited space between the sidewalk And the tight-01=way, they can't be located in the sidewalk. He's heard that based on the weather in the Peallrc Nurlhwesl It eau►cause Issues with the equipment in the in the vault. ▪ Can we require the small cells to traitrsmlt to the macrecolls by liber Most of the small cells will ;elmady be communicating by fiber, however this would he trying to regulate the technologynett the City would not he able to do this. • The frequency levels arc governed by FCC guidelines and the providers are required to comply with those. • ilehad not received aiiy crime sIatistic an Small cell silos • Taxes on wireless services,the city al ready alas i tax on wi rico services, hut c.On't iox on the data. 21018.Oi-25 Planning Commission Minutes P1r d3ueS Mr, i,ttonb stated them avers comments provided which wens received just teday from three of the provides, Yailznr►, T-tattle and Mollilltie, The legal office has aster lard a chance to review these comments, These were provided to the Conimissiprt axtowhiles el the anecting. ChairRararrrrasera opened the public hearing art 6:35 p.ur, Joel Arrow, Lyne.Corisili1 nh for Vaariacnii Mr, Arrow Mated the i•aulglot reguliilion of locution over the.20 foot lieigltt was fine with them. 1 lowever,he said that they do not recommend the underground ing ofccluilunenI. He said if they could place the radios oil the poles,they prefer 1t. Avlslo does not allow Ilion In place the radio on am polies,go it needs to be on the groused,six feet from the pole. issues with tlndergaoundlna the equipment arc: ▪ Water gets into The vault, litho radio gels'awl,Chen it fails. There is too niw.di moisture in the Pacific Northwest and the vault will gel wet. ■ The vault traps gases which are unsafe for the workers to breathe. * ConslruclrabiBily, 11 is cr signi.iicarnt foot paint for an underground vault, plus the OSHA roquiremEnls make it lamer. ■ Service rc.liability. When water gets into the vault, lhen the radio Foils. Mr.Arrow would not,recommend separation requirements. When he in trying to'create a network,lie Is trying to 1ti sites 740 to 1,00t1 fuel,ta}naart. If you have a 250 foul awparation requirement the laasi person in will have a difficult lime trying to fled sites they sato Then Ec}carte un, He would ramex raol recommend the co-location requirement, Avlsta will not allow co-localien however, if 11 awiis rt requirement,then there would he the&piipinent ho"ic all located a:mndonepoleandTepoleswould ascii to be battler. Commissioner Johnson asked what produced the gases and what they were. Mr.Arrow d I d knrtw hut sald he would have to rind out. C°oanataissioner Johnson asked about the radio which is used in the small cell sites. The radio is the brains of the small tell alts, Conaria lssloncx Kelley confirmed his understanding that population and obstructions would determine the location or moat!cells AIWA, Mr.Arrow also say dad consannpoion will drive it us well. •[he more usage you have,the moire small cells you%Al I need. Ca-location would telates to two different Canters eta one pole. Commissioner Kelley asked how large an underground vault world he. Mr.Arrow said they would need to have enough spacefora technician to be able to get ail the way around the equips eat, instead of having a small lek;o sized box silting above ground. Cemmimione r Siaathos wanteLi to know if the installation of the small cell sites being fatslnlieit ran power poles awunld be inlernipting zany c:taslonier"s power. Mr,Arnow said lie could not N.pr.olc to Clot Woe. She said water would be a problem for above ground equipment,and Mr, Avow sold It is n water pooling Imine on the equipment and the radio just cant be kept dry, Commissioner Walton confirmed the provider,at least Verizon,would 1ske iop keep the control radion on the same parr:at least IS feet in the ala' or to integrate it lob !hie base of the poalo, Ti it 0144 be placed on the;pok,then it must he located within she Leet of the pole the antenna is on. Mr. Arrow skid lac would prefer to rise;whatever utility pole is ovsilahle. 11'there is no pole,then Vencor would p ropceme all I auegra Lad light pole standard, Cunanissitmer Walton confirmed mast of the deployments occur in aaclghla.>rtaaods. But cities does well,it depends on where the data demands me. Comm issiones P'Itillips slated his concern with having another utility lo move should a developer need to improve n piece of proi>erty. Mr. Phillips asked how providers handie communities win,have underground utilities. Mr.Arrow said in those situalloxns they propose a single canister On the top of or pole, there are many designs which can be used to help in those neighborhoods. Mr. Phillips commented our community does not gel lia4 some amount of water as they get on the coast, Mr. Arrow said thek radio is very sensitive io water and condensation,and he asks that the Commission to read the confluents submitted by Verizon. COM ra91sslonea'Walton asked about reallstic health moms. He said the Veriwont email commented ihciu is less iuoiiaatlon than ababy monitor. Mr. Arrow sold these operate within FCC standards. Commissioner Wnllorn noted for Ilse record Ihat the PCC might not he able to keep up with emerging MIS-01-25 Planning Curnmissl an Minutes Page 4 ai'11 ieelmtdagie s, Cainrnissioraer Staines also commented nil OM radiation and confirmed irmed the antenna was what WLIs vitM{ISi1Jb the nlicroWaVe. Commissioner Johnson asked if line of site would he en i ue. Mr_Arrow was unable to answer the question,. Steven llurke,1Vlobllitle,Coeur d'Alene W;Mr.Burke works far Mobitltke and stated they are one of the largest itrlrastructure providers in ilia awtnury, working in tall 50 slates. Currently they are working with Sprint as a provider. Mr, Burke stated he toll it would be ImporieoL to have a sub- agreement for providers like him who services clients. MrhilitIe hes john use agreements-With Avislaa and CetutttryLink. Mr.Burke provided the Commission wlih pictures oflils equipment art an Avlstaaaa pole, 1k sural his canister has everything needed to run the equipment in at. ile said he leeks for secondary polos tibiale uvi needing replacement. He would replace the pole,put the canister on top of the holo wh l' tat dacyoo feet telt. Mr. Burke said the einem is within FCC guidelines rind the signal emit otti>Ewaard, not downward. He said there Is a dedicated power line Ill the canister and it does not disrupt power to the eratswner. Mnnnpelca could handle phone calls and eke ting,but now evdatyoate is on hrwial media,watching TV mid Lite cotrsuinor 1s demanding to transport this data savor ihs network. The small cella smolt;purpose is to transport data. Mobllltie has built over 25 clie,s nn Avlsta power pales in Spokane,and taro going lo ;;;seam drum on street lights sdson. lin is working with the city of Spulcaaae to install them on elty owned street Ijglitn, Iia u deeairativa street light Mobilitie would like to see Speludtre Valley become n connected city, Ila would recommend the approved to rho municipal uta kl, this is the way things are evtgiving send the eoinmtipity will he better served. He would like to maggot coffin the review lime from 6V Ic 30 cloys. commissioner Jnitntsen asked whit the optimum spacing would be. He said he doesn't have an optimum spacing but they lank where people are havht;the most amount of trouble:getting their data service. lie currently looking at sites along Pines triad, right now they am ii titanic] of a mile from each ocher. Commissioner Resintiissen asked what the tiextform of technology would he going. Mr,1{urke sl ated the mere the consumers want the technology, ward more chlor,then they will drive it. There will ha places where They will be needed for coverage. Mr.Arrow commented he attended a conference hi Korea, where the data usage is match higher than it is in the US and not only is Consirlacr date increas[iag but machine to machine co nmurucetiun, i'haises talking to caarr, lo fitness intekeas,In refrigera1ots, controlling the lights and furnac ,driverless ears. All of theseIhiugii are going to be data driven. f ominissiomrRnsinussedi asked whro's ewtpeoalhiIity It IN to tepid rrlreit;aged equipment and how soon would it get fixed. Mr.Arrow commented his egitilirnvatl lin mu maria mud ii would get repaired right away. !fit in damaged Then appropriate governing factors would wane Foto mired. Commissioner ti lathes confirmed the equipment tieing used was not proprietary. Fedi provider uses whatever works for them. She prefers the look of 1l]e Mobilitie system and wonders why the other providers can't use'the Mlle equipment, Commissioner Walton confirmed)lacoplo who have!alder plumes will still be able to use them. Mr, Bunce commented 'flip' phonrs ore for coils and text mcsan ing, Bryon wiint to be able to use the new technology,it will require a smaitphone, Commissioner P.,asasirisaen eontljnind that the prcwIdera will be supplying structural analysis to show the poles which they will be installing equipment on will be able to handle it Commissioner Johnson asked if this nwiew wars puri of ilia permitting process. Mr. Lamb stated the City did not have any pole standards eumently, blit a requirement of a certification could be built into the process. Mr. Arrow slated they submit a structural analysis for every polo they install if it is a small cell site or a large monopole. Mr.Lamb staled that utility providers ore heavily regulated by the Utilities Uncle Commission. Mr. Broke said CeutttryLink requites a pole loading nnalysis!rel ire laky approve the I nstnll1'11°n of the new equipment. Mr. i etnb wanted lo remind the Commission under Federal law, we cannot regulate ln,sed on transmission type_ We can ask for separation based on aesthetic concerns but not din hea]lh concerns. The regulations need to consider some or the providers who mire not able to mount all of their equipment on the pole. We cannot regulate lheteelannrogy,ao we cannot regulate that one provider use tine annie kind of tethnolugy another provider is using. He said we have tried to emit regulations 2011441-25 Planning CommissEnn MInnlcs rage 5015 which allow for flexibility. The spacing requirement is different for each provider es was suggested tonight, and the 250 feel is just RR suggestion, in the proposed regulations. If they tirle tiiready using existing power poles it needs to be;considered that maybe a distance between the cgtiiprituut and not the poles ihcroscives, Commissioner StallwA asked it It was 11msib1e to ask to have the round tucllliltas to he co-located. Mr.Lomb said he would nate to took into that and discuss it with the providers. Commissioner Walton rutted Who wns rc.sptrnsible for relocation of equipment in the right-of-way if it needs to be moved or the tight,of way is+acme 1, Mr.Lamb wild he would tnnnaur to look into the answer. Commissioner]obnsott asked if the City would have to maintain a tine of sight. Mr.Arrow said the technology was a diffused microwave and ii was not specifically a lues of si Iti, Mr.Lamb would iry and find mare irifuirnalion. Commissioner Walton metalled if a +Rall site .ii ised tliernRe a.i 10 city property, the francht o evreernent covey how the provider will be held re ponsihl a. commissioner Phillips asked lithe provider could be held reaiion;lhlc to move their equipment If it needs to moved, Mr. Lamb std be would have to look Mtn ills. Mr. Burks commented in his exjicrlence,they would need 6 -50 day's notice hi order to tint! another solution. #:cr+rinesxioner_itilvtsm rnriwd In coniiJNri the pirfi le.hearing,to Peftrm ij 8, 7018. The vok dill t,e nta#tat was sewn in,Awl;zero against t7011 She!mono):passed ill. Trnirring-Public I eciartin/Let,Open Public Meeliii g Act. Mc. Lamb conducted the City's annual training for Planning Cortliiiis inners and stab regarding i}ne, Public Records Act and Ihe Open Public Meetings Act, iv. Sillily Session Discussion ur°anti Space requirements The Commission decided to postpone this study session to the next meeting tVilI. COOD OF THE ORDER:There was nothing For the.gaud ofddie ontet. IX. ADJOURNMENT: Commissioner Johnson moved to adjourn the mccti ng at R:3; p.m, Me yore on the motion war r+atrranon nae in foal',The ano]ton passed 'WS Michelle Rasmussen,Clair Datk±signed �fy , Deanna IIorton,Secro[a,v Minutes. Spokane Valley Planning Commission Council Chambers—City THaII )February ,2018 T. Vice Chair Johnson called Ibe meeting to order at 6:07 p.m. Commissioners, staff and audience stood for tht' pledge of allegiance. Secretary I)eanIna Horton took roll and the following members and staff were present: James Johnson Cary Driskell, City Attorney Danielle Kxaschmniitcar Erik Lamb, Deputy City Attorney Tim Kelley i,ori Barlow, Senior Planner Mike Phillips Karen Kendall, Planner Michelle Rasmussen,absent excused Micki I larnois, Planner Suzanne Stathos Marty Paalaniuk, Plainer Matt Walton Deanna I Forton, SecreTry 1it+r l is Commission Commissioner Woitnn moved to excuse Comm4,srnner kirsnnissen fr•orna' cFrrrec?fel? . The vote on this motion was six ill favor, zero against and the matiEm passed, 11I. AGENDA: Commissioner Walton mocd to accept-t ;February? 8, 2018 agendajr nted. The carte on the motion was six in favor, zero against and I ii'`rre tion c . TM MINUTES: Commissioner Walton moved to approve thean 1..iary I E,2018 minutes as presented, Thi vole cera this motion was six in favor, z€rb:agains1, and the motioara_passed Commission Walton moved to approve the January .25, 20 I fi minutesms=presented.m . 'he vote•-rir dhIS rout on was sic in favot, zeta against and this motion passed. — 1V. COMMISSION REPORTS: '1`he Commis iibners h nr=t'ep.orts. V. ADMINISTRATIVE RE PRIG ': 'There was rfo_attlF)inistratiTe-TOort. VI. PTJRI,TC C OMM ENT '1'here=Was.no public comment. VII. COMIVIS, ION!DI`FSTNFSS: — Continued Public Ill r-iu+ "J Q17-2OUS proposed amendment to Spokane. Valley Munici ljn i SVM TFtlle. 2; PVT(r1' . U.{}Sll, SVMC 17. 0.031) and Appendix A lu iipdsitilw—heless lity re-Mations to 'address siting cif stuail cell wireless facilities within the _psrblie rights�ot" ,,, _I-Tidily City Attorr.ey' k Lamb s'4 Ycc1 the Commission continued the hearing rrom Januaty 25,2018. rT arta answered sontiafihe quiestions raised at that meeting: ■ liaa. the City r iire a specific distance between new poles? hir_ Lamb said this was fc ti it lc.The ilia-fists-3T suggested this could prove problematic the more people who entered the rerEicet, 4-Ee industry said the distance. requirement could make it difficult to fired a locallocation-r_ahteli worked with the technology, • Can the{.ity require the providers to co-locate? Mr. Lamb said legally the City could require co-lova[ion however some of the utility companies do not allow it. I ie noted some of the technology doesn't work if there is more than one provider on the samric pc ]e • Can the City require a minimum height for equipment location? Mr_ Lamb said to the extent that iI doesn't interfere with the technology, li minimum height of20 feel would not lose a problem, but a higher level, above 60-80 feet, may cause issues from a technology standpoint. • Can the City require the ground base facilities to he buried? Mr. Lamb suited legally the City could require it, although there a practical considerations. The industry provided a significant number of comments regarding how del([mental to the equipment un,gouudiiig can he, 2Oi8-02-08 Noon iog C.oinmission M.inutra Page 2 of 5 • Can the City require providers.to transmit from the small cell to the macro cell via fiber? Mr. Lamb said the City cannot regulate the technology. 13y requiring the method of transmission, we would be regulating their technology. • There were: questions regarding radiation levels, type of bandwidth, possible impacts on people_ Mr. Lamb said under federal law we cannot regulate based on type of signal, which would be regulating the technology- He said these items are regulated by the Federal Communication Commission (FCC) and as long as the equipment meets FCC criteria the City cannot regulate them. * The Commission requested crime statistics on g-o.ind based facilities. Mr. Lamb said according-to the industry comments these structures do not have an impact on crime. * Could the City tax wireless facilities? Mr. Lamb said the City. already has a tax on telephone) wire cis. He said cities can do this under federal law, however we cannot tax the data, _ • Could the City require the provider to submit an engin ring ee.rtitication of the pole structures? Mr. Lamb said the City could require ilu maid this relates to the public safety of facilities placed in the right-of-way, rle the does not have any pole standards, the utility companies do. The providers woad-TI:ready he supplying this inforrr,;atico to the utility providers so it woril ot ant to ask r7r.a copy of it with the. application, • Who is responsible for the cost of relocation of polus With small celr cilities on them? Mr-, Lamb stated the cost of relocation is tri i'esponsi5ibity of the party maelag the request, Relocation costs are the responsibility o thin rat, company if ii ar capital project. Relocations cost arc the re_spcnsibility of the de±Tier when it is a private development, • is line of site a problem? Mr,J.arrah said accoodinwtu testimony at the last meeting, line of site wary not an issue, Hasaltlit' lipokane Valley th 4c g aphy does not pose a problem because olthc nature of the vikil he-City does noFairi issues similar to downtown Seattle with all the hillsides and huildthgs -lnadustry has_representatives who can provide more clarification, — t1 . Lamb saigLsialt4fid the Comrnissilirr received Cariments at the last meeting from the industry proud' "ers. H5ld eviewed therfla ick offered comments on some of the topics which were brouglrp. = • 'the industry"1=c ueste tito=have the undelgrounding l: eilities requirement removed. Mr. _Lamb laic_ legalkytl3e City canrrequir it, However, there are considerations dade to the site _=ifi't1 Y tttlts',vault= afeFty and 1oc tine, as pictures supplied by the vendors showed, * '1'lie industry Lqucst je r oving the requirement fur eo-Location era•a minimum distance between reToles. MF-I-im.b said staff does not see an issue with those requirements. 'i'J7e industry :camrrzentc_1- it would hinder the last company into the market. The Commissioner xpressed concern someone's burr e may have 3, ,1 or 5 poles played in -fir-int of it_ Mr. amb offered that in front of city hal] there is a pole on the edge of City I kill.pt.operfy rare another existing pole 2U-30 feet away. • The 1iINstay r quested shortening the permit processing time from 60 to 30 days. Mr_ i amb salt days is required under state and federal law. The City's permit processing time is rniieh shorter than that, however he recommends keeping 60 days. • T-Mobile requested the City allow a unified camouflage design. Mr. Lamb said this would be facility that houses both the antenna and control equipment in one.enclosure. -1-Mobile has suggested a unit which would not be bigger than six cubic feet. This is smaller iii sive than the size of the antenna and control box together. Mr. Lamb said this was a reasonable request and the Commission could consider this, however staff suggested a name change to 1 iin it confusion. ■ The industry requested allowing small cell facilities within city parks. Mr_ Lamb said given the size of our parks and their proximity the right-of-way there is no need for a facility the park_ The City has been working to clean up the overhead in its parks, it would be inappropriate to allow small cell facilities within the boundaries of the park. 2018-02-08 Pt ng(Qnimassian Mirages Page 3 of • The industry requested increasing the-bei ;hl of the electric transmissions structure from 50 to 60 Feel. Mr.Lamb shied this related to the Large macro-poles and he recommended not iTtak iris;this change_ • ']'he indusry requested increasing the allowable deviation before im action is viewed as ra substantial change_ Mr, Lamb said this is the amount of deviation allowed hethrc a Conditional Use Permit is required. He said the City regulations are relatively flexible and open, he would not tixonr,rnctid this change_ Commissioner Johnson and Phillips expressed concerns regarding the requirement for private developer 13;Ayitig to move of the utility pole when there is a private development. Commissioner Johnson shared his fear that line of site could pose a problem when a new building is meted. Mr. Lamb said it is _he responsibility the carriers to determine if their equipment was able to communicate. Vico~ehair.lahnso-t asked for public comment Joel Am,Links Consulting for erfron: Mr. Aro said hea5Nsiaaressing a couple of questions which arose. He staled There are naturally occurring gases ii an under hand vault. The equipment contained in the vault does not emit any kind of gas. He-commented li-o_—w=dainaged the equipment becomes if it is required to ha boric{. }lc re s-iTthe City elii this requirement, Commissioner Walton asked,/w the size of the ground cabinet Verizon uses Tr.. Aro said he did not have the specifications with him. Mr.11r 8idit wail ld he the responsibi lity:f he canier For making sure that they have eamrnunicatinn wit17 'their ownaacilities. CortnnsTriimet .John.eim Confirmed r merl eriaoo Iroyefers fiber er and that extensive-damage., as town its l er ii n's comment is caused by putting the equipment underground, and Steven Burke, Mobilitie, Coeur i1'-Mere W: Mr. Buaekc said_ he felt the Legal department had done a good job with the regulations=Vinci-he-wanted to encourage the Planning Commission to forward them to the City Council. + ta>k s1 '1'+°4ohilitie has a_ ) Tnntained antenna and control equipment in one unit. He said crime will-be cliffidult stating_tliaf Avista and t~eritut'vi.ink require equipment to he ten feet off the ground.. 1r. i rke saki-' li enough notice his company would move their own equrpn en City Attorney Driskellui riried how Washington state statutes regulates who pays to move a utility pole lam-Latin the right-of-way. He sar:d_uhder the statute i f the City is doing a capital project and utility }oletneeds=to-be avid, l.Fic cal is on the utility company. It is being moved for the puha-bonelit,. Tlfc=i ty T rad i rrnmissiorr (U I'C) has imposed tariff utility rates which lrtiy =i �`"tlr a tiToves. 'l he=_1J'1'0 determined that the person making the request pays for the nT vement. if itis_rpri.vittc d vciopinent,then the developer pays_ � atmamissioner Waltc�ti_tta�ked liow ianiy sites each of the carriers present were looking to deploy, Breen 171t6e for Mobilitie stated-They had sins., Mr. Aro stated Vcriron was looking at three at this Comm issrcaiier.5tE_thos €s. nfimied the equipment would be labeled for safety as required Dennis CruptcSpuluTne Crapo stated he wanted the Commission to be aware ol'the unintended acme ienees of allowing more poles in the right-of-way. He said it would set a precedence, and-cnuld keep someone[rain being able to develop a property_ Seeingno one else who w€sh& to lesri,v, Vice-Chair .Johnson dosed the public hearing a! 6:54 p.rfir. Mr. Ltarnb suggested the Commission begin with the propoLed amendments which were presented at the January 25 meeting. 'Then move to the:proposed chn1.ges to that proposal: ▪ the 20 foot minimum height requirement, • the facilities must be buried in 111c,ground unless technically infeasible, i 8-02-08 Phinnit g Croirirnissicon Minutes Page 4 of 5 • not located within a certain number of fbct (currently bracketed will 250 in this holding; spot) of other`sallall cell facilities unless the applicant demonstrates that no other location can accommodate or is sufficient to meet the wireless service needs, • if the provider cannot meet the 250-lot distance, then they must make an alt nlp4 to co- locate unless they demonstrate a reason why it is not possible. Mr. Lamb addressed the public cormont which said that this could setaprecedence. He said cities, under state. and federal law, are required to allow facilities ID locate within the right-of-way. The City cannot preclude Lhem, which was the mason for the amendment. Mr. Lamb confirmed facilities can locale on private property, but it re-quires an agreement with that private property owner allowing a recorded easement. The Commission began deliberations of the issues which had beeilpresented for change to the proposed amendment. Commissioners agreed to add a 250-ftsok•di l iiitec requirement between facilities. They Fe.t if the industry could demonstrate the prublerilbf locating at this distance, they can change it. The Commissioners agreed to add the requiper enf for co-location, if it was at ail feasible. The Commissioners discussed requiring a 20-fait height minimi.m and agreed to this addition, Then the Commissioners moved to the reCixirrcirrcnt of undergrounding the eontt`+ail equipment. After their discussion the Commissioners treed to adding shisT lan.girage as well. There was a consensus that requiring transmission by faht would ,rot be added, because the City cannot regulate the technology. Commissioners agfccd to adding the requirement=uf-engineering certification fur the polo. Commissioner Johnson felt parcelitlt a 50-fort fronto-age should be exempt.from new poles. Commissioner Phillips said he feel fhc ca rier should have to pay to move any utilities. Mr. Lamb said from practical standpoint he-vy'ais not sure how the City would he able to enforce it. Commissioner Walto"neo nfirmed there is ilii-7, comment or noticing regarding installation of a new utility pole. 11fi "itralu.asked how theIinn-iission felt about reducing the permit processing Timeline from 6O-days.'1' bmmissioners ago to leave the 60-davtime line. The Commissioners agreed to allow for m cotfbiffez_ closure wh ch might be a bit bigger than the allowable size for the antenna alone. Ther7Cornin.rssianerMsi OeJ they did not want to allow small cell facilities in Cityp l s; The Commissioners aged-To—: to change the height limitations on electrical transmissian towers, The CommisAioners agreed to not change the deviation standards, Mr. Lamb saidi.liommissioil should make a motion to approve the changes presented on January 25 along with the el es which were discussed`1tYnight which include: a 250-foot separation along with the co-location r direr' icul, ti minimum. height cif 20-feet, retain the existing language on the ground n1tsF4idJition 1's siructuial engineer certification with the ;application, and allowing unified eai7](71 -facttity'° with.a different tem as part of those changes.. =_:_77.0,137rnis.yioner Froftixia rmoved tn4RopTomencllu the Calve Cowed timoproposed amendment with the dittoes which had be iir rad r erorded 1y the Deputy City Attorney.. The vote on Ila 'notion was Lsliki I.fr tar, zawo a dinst aid the motion passed Senior PlanneMrri Barlow s:tiggested changing the agenda to move the Comprehensive Plan study session ahead of-#lie Open_ pace discussion due to the number of people in attendairt;t: who were interested in the topic . NM mission gave consensus to proceed. ii. Study Session— 2018 Comprehensive Plan amendments: Ms. Barlow presented an overview of the Comprehensive Plan process. She expfariatcd there were originally lour pries Ltaly initiated requests and three City initiated amendments- She explained after the docket. was approved, one of the privately initiated amendments was withdrawn. One City initiated aincndments was also withdrawn. tiller curivCrsatinns with the property owner they requested Ltic City hold off making the proposed change while.they develop their plan for the property. plannerMicki ilarnois explained CPA-2018-0001_ Vie property is located approximately 300 feet ea:l of Pines Road on Valleyway Ave. The request is the change three parcels of approximaLe[y two acres from Single Family Residential and R.-3 zoning to Multifamily Comprehensive Plan designation and zoning. 'I'ht site is surrounded by muhiftimily designation Lu .he north and south and Corridor Mixed Ilse to the west of the property. There have been no comments received for this amendment. 20L$-O2-0&Planning ,'oItftiiissiaa Minutes Page 5 o[5 Ms. Harnois reinirdcd iiia Commissioners that CPA-2018-0002 bad been withdrawn by the property owner_ Planner Marty IPaiaiiuk explained CPA-2018-0003 is located al I-3owdish and Sands Roads. The request is to change the S:ngle family desit pati+iri and R-2 roving to Corridor Mixed Use (CM1.1), ('.M(I designation located across the railroad tracks arid I)ishman Mica Road. lie said the.lotwwas created after a subdivision of the properly in 2010, which divided the property for several single family lots on the south side of the original lot. This lot was created as a drainage easement which has been dedicated to tf1e City, The property is surrounded on three sides by a single family residential and the railroad tracks to the north. The properly borders Chesler Creek, is located n a floodplain, has a Type F'' sireirn, a biologist has reported there are no wetlands on the site. Commissioner Walton asked if the property would have been alio wt d to he divided if the drainage easement had not been a part of it- Mr.Palaniuk stated he would have to defer to engineers an answer. Mr, Palaitiuk stated the Commissioners already had any coin milt which was provided up to the time of mailing the pad1 et Any comments received since then had beer, provided to the Commissioners rs that evening- -- Mr, Palaniuk discit_csed CPA-20I8-0004 is located at the correro-i'P-71fi.Avenue and University Road. The request is to change the des nation from Single Prii'iily l Kildential and R..3 mning to Neighborhood Gomm.ercial, He explained the subject pa el� utted airath r properly owned by the same property owner, which was changed to Nei .orhood Cornrricrcial during the 201.6. Comprehensive 13lan update. Mr. Palaniuk said thepruperty as surrounded'o otther sides by single family, 1lie site is bordered by University Road which is a-minor asteria]. 1 li-=i-salai iuk said the Commissioners had any comments staff have i cc:iv l- Plattner Karen Kendall was beginning her discussion of CPA,-20184005,when Commissioner Phillips recused himself regarding this amendment, and left toenuncil chambers. The City initiated amendments are both correcting mappifl Coors. The properfor CPA-2018-0005 is located at the corner of Progress and Porker Road. We-parcels are split betty tin... NeMiborhood Commercial and Single Family Residential- The amendlnenr s=to-designate the tau' Il_an'ri east edge of one parcel as Neighborhood Commercial and another a'iong tliae- .PA_easernetit- C-Crrinnissionei, Stathos commented the dues.could not handle any more. Lraffre irdt was da weliaa e i:_= MS, Kendall explain i change proposed_ 1Ii.:FA-201 I111106- The property is located on .1'rt:nt Avenue approxim; 1yanene wind .roc half mile Filist of Sullivan. The parcel is developed and there is a stormwater swat -along the T 5 ct to he rezt-rnetti The parcel is split zoned with the T 5 feet on the east side of this pare:;l-] rirned Sill ,le Family Resi€3ential while the rest is Industrial Mixed Use. The proposed change is tb rke the,easterly side.Indusfriiii Mixed Ilse. Thenext stc s,t.he puhll' wring whiai-is-sc i'eduled for February 22, 2018. iii. Shady Session, [lppii3Space errierkta hi Mixed Use zones. 'he Commission M=1c postp c;;tl1c discussion of open space requirements to another meeting_ VIII. GOOF +'THE RiJER`TTherc .vas nothing for the good of the order, IX. ADJOURNMENT: Gomm i . inner Walton moved to adjourn th':meting at 8:35 p.m. The vote cw the minion way y airrilrarraaouc hi fd iibr, the lnotien passed Michelle Rasmussen, Chair Date signed Deanna Horton, Seerctiliy S1k1an ~ Valley. Mobilite Comrnentc Re: Planning Commission CTA 2017-0405 Draft 1f3/38-MOBICri1E COMMENTS-HEHLIG MED IH DRAFT APPENDIX ADEFINITIONS RadioTTV broadcasting studio:Facilities serving the broadcast media-See "Communication facilities,use category.' Repeater facility:A facility for the noncommercial reception and retransmission o-radio signals.See°Communication facilities,use category' RF E i !1nE-r: A *croon who in the o.inion of the r a+er = ••ro fiats • education.training and experiencsin wireles• +n t ti4 -ervices radio • freouenciesLand FCC aid other a«'i'hie .ove s_u al .ulations to provide the I nesse certifi `on s re i d ursuant •- >a'ter 22 1, SVMC. Telecommunications:The transmission,between or among pplints specified by The user,of audio arEdfor visual infmmalon and data of the user's ch&ising,without change In the form or content of the information as sent and received. Alternative mounting structaro;A water tower, manmade tree,clock rawer.church steeple,bell tower,utility polo, right standard, r"eesiandir Ig sign, Rag pole,Or similar structure designed to support and camouflage or conceal the presence of telecommunications antennas, +Antenna:#rE j.or aaralrrs de flned fo"' eeDorllc t fie,data, Internet€t-other corn:nurri - ons.tfl 1441 IEEE','_ dine a ■r -die"fre.uenc ignals jncl.Edino but not r=• to.eg ement aftQe l d to a toll;po1g,light standard. pole,plul ding or other 3rr.Eckure:far k`I a riurrats of orrrr:di rm wireless servis-Tortes of Antennas inc 4e: • .7,t,�.,Sfnrit4trectionel antenna' receaeaesa t r nsrnits red enC si Weis In ;SAO-degreemedial I attecu: :i r. i. antenna*.'s i i cmil',+irectional a : na that is ri.to feel in heigtif and lamore than si7c inchesIK'di,2l ..—te and -A Enc al oripanet sills n ha`receives -r■. =n tails radio enc. Si*nails in a sp c r lirectiora' ettern of lambert 350 d ereese iCle usest-to,aelteradiate radio tolevi ro+ ve-elestregiagnetic waves, Includingdikect1 - nnas, cul as panelc,wireless cable and satellite d h end-- ai- Eceet at-antenaoc,cuCh asWlii{rs, 14 earth stht or7S Or emrstereinl-antenneslnctallotions far Ise-Ice-of iO-or television. Antenna Het aMt; The vertical distance mearir,red from everaar:building elevati n the hi hes Fant of the an air or if on a rooftoor oth= structure from t •a of the roof or structure to the Wohest point of the antenna For replacement structures, antenna h hi m asure tr rn the to ofttre $ti rSt st re tD Ih hl h st p i :lit le antenna or new structure,whichever is gr€,ake:-- 1 CTA 20117-0005 Dram 1/3/18-MOEiLME COMMENTS-HIIGHIJG41TEC IN In •A. rav!d small cell tact I : An a3rna •__ u.I' that has re, -• all fe.ul red pe:mics. •Array.An arrangement of antennas and their supporting structure" •Base$tItion: A structure o,F eguiprrleril at a fixed location that enables FCC-kcens@a o, r uthorazed wirele s mrnunicJations between user equipment and a communications networklie term do-s r■ =n■_•m.assatoi►' -- definedherein ;ran e•ul.went associated with a ower. Base slain includes,withc limitation: -1=q ui[arrrent associated with+,fireless corr mu nidations servicies as well lanlicensed wiretess ervices and rjreiess se&ices such as microwave bactau. -Radio iransoaivers.antennas,coaxial or fa41giticcable,regular and lacfur} power supplies,and comparable •{ui = •a3Vess of to rola icat configuration(including Distribul, d Ar nl a ysten `."1]AS'1 and smell-cell Ftelrlgs3. Any structure other than a t r tf ri<:.at the tirnn�he reev .aooIioation is filed with I e Cit sus rerts a cruses e+ui*"s, de : bed abova'l has treer� reviewed and approved uryite c 'e a••Ilcab . s .,- nr slung process"or Under another State or local ,'u r tt{;s,rev v yw .i.' even if the structs re was not built For the sole or .nam i :I w4*c- •f *rOvidiri•.at su.'ar't. The term does not Include any strucf i that at,#ie tune the relevant application is tiled wills the City,does n• :;G,a, or h•,. . .ul..11. s._. Col location:TYt a f.' ntinnsi- -i¢s i-risaii •F. ui.men.t on an eligible su000rt structure f• nUrpOt4f trams.41'llid al• • e■ ivin i radio fregueii signals for communlc Qli purO s. tint by�ri:x�,..k aa ,re}#1 tl jE 9r 5 ice provider. s:IMeri •Con t5tt:nt tetff s •to• Tian iS . al nes ■ • •nett to look like some feature other o a wire ss +', c r or station tri`-Which minimizes the vi :" u ad of an alien nd.. .-use of nonrpf,,otive cealment canister. ' •Dish A para'bu is or bowl 4ped device that receives and/or transmits signals h a specific direclloriil #lern •El A-222: Electronics.Indiraln`es Association Standard 222,'Slructural Standards for Steel Antenna Towers liaAntennas Support Structures •Electric transmission:A self-supporting structure In excess of ni feet in height designed to support high voltage etectric lines.Thisdoes riot include local utility or distribution poles(with or without transfonrrers)designed to provide electric service to individual customers. •Ell rti le Faculties Restuest: Arltr re Qalest for modifioalion vl an exls!inri tower :t: i. al Elar s net ,.i- a [sill d-ua !e r- =ioal dimonsia " . •. =r ar base stetipn,involving: -Cogocation of new traLismission equipment; 2 GTA 2017.0005 Draft 113118•-MDBIL11IE COMMENTS—HIGHLIGHTED IN I. Rerov l of transmission equipment,tlr _ -Reelacemsot r#transmssion equipment. -Eligible support Jre: Any lemur base sta i sn as definedinlhis section ,rovided that it i- at the lime lh= elevarrt a.+Iicacon is filed with the Ci houses Cr supports an antenna,in' o,cell ray srrlat u&tl deploYrneut= •Equipment strtrctura. A facili ty s $Iter cabinet cine vault used#o house and Drotad eleclrorltc or other associated equipment nese ary for orocessinawireless co mu iccations si Hale-'Assoc ated oquapmenF may inglude, for exaq] In e.air conditioning,backu• I e .r .pliesand a .,r.enc +e , r Existing: A constructed tower or base station is or s fhq i'it has been reviewed d and Approved under t t a'■livable coin+ 01 siliin n• , :or uncle another stale orb oat r utato rev ev rocess rovided that owe ".at has=jot been reviewed and review-.because it. -s not in a zor-' are , -` i#was b1lt i .but was lawfully constructed,is existing for purposes of chi s 4'22.122 SVM.t~.: ▪Guyed,tower;Any telecamm]nications tower supported in whole Dr in part by cables anchored to the ground. •Height:The distance measured from grade to the highest point of any and all components of the structure,including anterinas, hazard lighting, and other appurtenances.if aray- •Microcells: Has the a rig ttarn f {5:t fellfkt b 3fa-37 i,8s it w adopted or hereafter amendecf: •Monopole:A sell'-supporting telecommunications tow'ordtirhich consists of a single vertical pole,fixed into the ground arrdfor altadied to a foundation. •Other supfagrt strracture k �� retutp uses# D.s ort small cell ilities or eplripm a#stisjsturefi rxcllt l:t br+'Idiiii s iltiIi :Dot as.and water ilreservoirs. EXazinles of:lather s'.ifipar siruotures' tri Jude fiagoolilsand ball field light standards. •Panel;An antenna which receives andlor transmits signals in a directional pattern. •prior approval: Certificat on of approval(s)frpni the Cilli+yitorizino the i Citi l installation of 2 Specific wirotkrs carrier's small cell facilities on a base station or tower, prier aouroval riay etso incl the subseuol approval(s)from the City authorizing modifications to tltiei€I!ial initaAatio that have resulted lo the existing state of the small ce acili lrtciudi Ira butt-16:h. i F o the nuher and locationof a ui rnenl s ores. antennas.antenna su oPPA' fractures,and ancitlary equipment. •self-supporting lattice tom r;A telecommunications tower that consists of an open network of metal braces, usually triangular or square in cress-section. •Service:The offering of tel for a fee directly to the public, or tc such classes of users as to be effectively available directly to the public,regardless of the facilities used. •Serviceorovi. : Has the a meanin eel forth In RCyv 35..99.010M es new adopted or hereafter amended- Service_provider shall include those Infrmstrraclure 3 CrA 2017-0005 Draft 3/3/18—MOSIIJDE COMMENTS—HIGHLIGHTED IN companies thaaprcrvtde teteiog municatioos ,ervices or erluipment to eagle the delployinent of personal wireless services. *Small cell and ism- cell de•to • l t!Have the s-u e meanin• :at forth in R J S 36.376 as noarfc ed ar after amen d. •Stealth,A telecommunications antenna that is effectively camouflaged or corlceuled from view. •Substantial chance;A n • r lion substantially changes the physical dirnensic�ls afof ars elitrib]e support structure if it meets era of the fotl g rdlerle: -For I• rs other than towers in the •ubtic ri h' sa a it increases the height cif he tower b ore than-10% •r b the r i1`t Of one adMonal antenu arra vi," e•aration frog e nearest =xis .ad am n-not to exceed en fact whichever is relater for Other e1' i I tt• o!t lruetures, 1.1 increases Ine help1it of tructure tyv more then 1 •k}r more thann fee�tlever is or te?rs -For Jowere other Man towers in ih • is ris • -wa itis a addin r e, aapu.rferrerloet°the bod cs the towed s:r, ou ;< it •e fr.. tt a ed■e o the tovrar�tr are than rent or re the"±r , 'iii of the iow,gtgucture at level of the a•ourtena +.-ve • 21-6;4 +r+ her eli.idle su•tNri s ructures it involves addi bow .f e structure t-at would ittxirude from a®d. tfi9 =+ re is a:r a than six feet; -For a ri elr i l.. s ;r*or. nr it In `Li - ' staff: +d of more than Abe standar. 4 u Of.. . erul,m t ea; f f• h elfinolot ' volved but not to ex+oeed f4.k binetet` forte ,s'ss the •uli Wet tf-we and base steliofis iI lnvdt e.s insta on of aniliew eoulpment cabinets on fide mound if tt• - . e no it _ < ti"-.+ •., a■ cab' s, e,sodated wills e stnuctklre, o-else I .-Sk' : a#nor + c1.i Mier are mo a than 10%larger In height or vollu?Yi9-=lran = s associated ,i h the structure. .-n ilsan M.s -ticn" Y e+f• enloulsl,e hecurrentsite- tt aatritk at elements of the etiibte support structure or -It d❑egtint conpty v} ,coild ions associgLed with the Wino aooroval of the con, I. F '. r mod+li+:_ on of the = i.ible su r +r s ructure Of be,e station e•ui• ,ens •i dr;! eve hat this limitation does not alai to an modificatioi hat in fl u.lraratonl "i a manner Ilia would not exceed the thresholds Identifigiiabove. •Teleeommunicatianla antenna:An antenna used to provide a telecommunications service.This excludes lightning rods,private mobile radio systems,amateur radio antennas less than 35 feet in height in residential districts and 50 feet in height In nonresidential districts,and whip antennas less than four inches(10 crn)in diameter and less than 10 feet In height Teles, glrnv rllcatlog peruke: the samerroeani np as set forth In RCW 35.59.010t7 s now aadr or herea r amended 4 CTA 2.017-0005 Draft 1/3/18— PILITIE COMMENTS—HIOHUGHTED 6N •Tower:Any st uctuu built for Lite sole r ri.mar r se of su oil n n FCC- ricer:sect or authorized antenna:-and their associated facilities, including strucluf s that area strutted forlessocmmun ns services Ind udinp. but no, rniledl0, ' ivate .L -dcas and tub issafet service as well as ii•censedwlrel ;- services rad fixes wireless ervices suety as icrcr, ave back aul and the assgciates site. A lower s all not irtdud c - :i lacernent mill .ole es au r+riled b a lea, .with the City,a franchise ora Small Ge,11 Permit.A 41r uyvd structure moren ry^ alit,built rlly Lo support-rear mons tel$carl) to a& Does-not inclu4a-ham a#orDr- nd-turbine support towers- •Transmission equipment:S4auiarnent flat facilitates iffiihsrnisiori for anv FCC- licensed or authorized idgjess corn murlication servicerjaNding,but not limited to, ado transceivers rlleranas coa ial or fiber-o tic til ,i i d regular and backup Power sur t Iy r3lerrn inc ui;alrlent associateswifh wlrcloss communications services Including,but not lirnitad to, private, brwwdcast-and f)L.K1c safely services,as well as unlicensed wt..halo services and firedwireless services such as rniorewme batckhairl. •Utility Dole: Astructure desliined and usec'1,;arnarily for the suppDit of electrica' wires,telepho - wires telev--ion :ble tra Ic .. als of righting for oh•a parkin areas,or pedestrian PRIM- Ip. te,na44,11erw i d +er--oraal di le elm is 0f lugs+ l-snap^which Is ne more than six inehe ,tiler. ■VWreless:Having no rite or wires, operating by means of transmitted electromagnetic Tower,ham operator:A struc_ure less then 75 feet In height above grade used for two- way communication for hobby or emergency service purposes by private individuals. See'Ccn1municat;a:afacilities,use cafe or ." • 5 CTA 2417-00EI5 Ptah 113/19.-M43ILIf1E COMMENT5- IIGHLIG1i7ED IN DRAFT SVMC 18.60.060 UaerCalegay RI R2 R3 MF2 CML! GO 0 RC PIOSI 12 Type C1 mmurileattan Facilities 1.1 Radia/TV broadcasting 1111111, RepeaRerI2difty,dly ® . - Cha [ rna1 i Hell ^ deploymen`. Telecentmtinleelion 111111 I 11 Cnapier wiroless#alenna 22.1201 arra $NIMC array Teleccenrrnmicalian Chapker wireless euppo11 C S S S 22120 tower SVM. Tower,ham ' S C operator S S C S S S 19.4d.110(A) 6 (TA20t7•DOOS Ddal'r 1/3/18-M0aIt TIE COMMENTS-HIGH LIOFIT O IN- DRAFT Chapter 22.120 SVMC 22,120.010 Purpose and Intern" • These standards were developed to protect the public health.safety, and welfare,and minimize visual impacts on residential areas,while furthering the development of wireless communication services.These standards were designed to comply with the Telecommunication Act of 1996.The provisions of chaplr22.120 are-lot intended to and shall riot be interpreted lo prohibit orto have the effect of prohibiting wireless communication services. Chapter 22.120 nail Cciver soli "r t s oornmunicak nseivlcesOpt-Lan mg cell seroces,w hi h are regulated pursuant to chapter 22.121 Y1 C" 22.120.020 Permits and imam pitons. Where a transmission tower or2ntenria support structure is located In i ' ring district Which allows such use' as a pemcltted use activity,administrative review,kind a building permit,shall be required,subject lto the project's consistency with the developmert standards set forth in SVMC 22.1120,040. In instances where the use is not allowed as a permitted use activity,a cpnditivnal use pernnk and bu;lding permit shall be required In addition to a dernonst[atrdn of.corasisten�+with ell required development steridares. Exemption_Wireless radio ut l zed forteraaporary egnergency communications in the event of a disaster is exempt from the provisloris of this section end shall be permitted in all zones. 22.120.030IFi4iqulrie �pp d eticellon submittals. All appircetions for wird/Os antenna arrays end wireless communication support towers shall include thfollowing, A.A letter signed by the appy Ont stating that all applicable requirements of the FCC, the FAA, and eny required a+ gakion easements have been satisfied. B.A scaled site plan scanty Indicating the location,type and height ref the proposed tower.antennas,on-siteTand uses and zoning.adjacent land uses and zoning,adjacent roadways,proposed means of access,setbacks from property lines, elevation drawings of the proposed tower,the equipment structure,fencing,buffering and the type e stealth technology which will be utilized.The full,detailed site plan shall not be required if the antenna is to be mounted on en existing structure. C.The applicant shall"have performed and provided a photographic simulation of the proposed facility from all affected properties and public rights-of-way. 7 CIA 2017-0005 Draft 113/18-MOBILIIIE COM MENI5-HIGH LIG HIM IN= ID.The applicant shall provide copies of any environmental documents required by the Stale Environmental Policy Act i SEPA}. E.The applicant shall have demonstrated effort to ca•locate on an existing support tower or other structure. Now sLpport towers shall not be permitted within one mile of an existing support tower Unless it is demonstrated that no existing support tower or other structure con accommodate the proposed antenna array. The City reserves the rigit to retain a qualified consultant, at the applicant's expense,to review the supporting documentation for accuracy. F. 'Evidence to demonstrate Ma-.no existing support toyer Of other structure can accornniodate the proposed antenna array may c❑risist of the following: 1- No existing support towels or other structrires are located within the geographic areas required to meet the applicant's engineering requirements. 2, Existing support towers or other structures are not of sufficient height to meet the applicant's engineering requirements. 3. Existing support towers or other structures do not have sufficient structural strength b support the applicants proposed antenna array and related equipment. 4.The applicants Freposed antenna would cause electromagnetic interference with the antenna on the existing support towers or other structures, or the antenna on the existing support towers or other structures would cause Interference with ti.,e applicant's proposed antenna- G.The applicant of n hey.,tower shall provide a signed statement stating the appli:ant has provided notice to all other area wireloss service providers of its application tc encourage the co-localion of additional antennas on the structure- I-I. f signed statement from tate owner anddor landlord to remove the facility or obtain another permit for the facility tiv tion six months of when the facility is no longer operating as part of a.wretess communication system authorized and Rcensed by the FCC_ I. Proof that all the necessary/raps ty or easements have been secured to assure for the proper constiUclipn, Contin ued maintenance, and general safety of the properties adjoining the wireles:comrritiricalion facility. 22.120.040 Design standards. The support tower, antenna array,and supporting electrical and Mechanical equipment shall be installed using stealth technology, Stealth technology applies to ail personal wireless service fadlities, including,without limitation, antennas,towers and equipment structures. For any facility, stealth technology means the use of both existing and future technology through which a personal wireless service facility is designed to reser-lble an object which is already present in the local environment, such as a tree,streetlight,or traffic signal. It also includes: a C? 2017-O005Draft 1f3/1a—MOB1ErfIECOMMENTS—HIGHLIGHTED IN A,For personal wireless service support towers; 1. If within existing trees, `stealth technology'means_ a.The tower tato be painted a dark color; b. Is made of wood or metal; and c.A greenbelt easement is required to ensure permanent retention of the surrounding trees. 2. Stealth technology for lowers in a more open setting means that they must have a backdrop(for example, but not limited to,trees,a hillside,or a structure)on at least two sides, be a compatible color with the backdrop,be made of compatible materials with the backdrop,and that architectural or landscape screening be provided for the Other two sides. If existing trees are the backdrop,then a greenbelt easement is required to ensure permanent retention of the surrounding trees. . 3, Antennas shall be integrated into the design of any personal wireless service tower to wl7-ch they are attached. External projections from the tower shall be limited to the greatest extent technically feasible, 4. For rooftop antennas or antennas mounted on other structures: a,For omni-dire tional antennas 15 feet Or less above the roof,stealth technotogy means use of a color compatible with the root,structu-e or P background; means use of compatible b. For other amen nab,s,ealth technology colors and architectt°lfal scr1ening or other techniques approved by the City, B. For antennas mounted on one or more building facades, stealth technology means use of color and mate$iais sucF that the facility has architectural compatibility with the building. It shall be maurited or a wall of an existing building in a configuration as-flush to the wall as ted1riically possible and shall not project above the wall on which it=s mounted. C. For equipment structu£e.s, slealth technology means locating within a building,or if on top of a building,with architecturally mpatible screening.An underground location, or above ground with a solid!moo and landscaping, is also considered stealth technology, D.Advertising or d isplay,shall not be located On any support tower or antenna array: however,the owner of the antenna array shall place an Identification plate indicating the name of the wireless service provider end a telephone number for emergency contact on the site. E. No artificial lights other thar those required by FM or other applicable authoriy shall be permitted.All security;lights shall be down-shielded,and installed to be consistent with Chapter 22.60 OVMC. 9 CIA 2017.004S bra ft 1/3118-MOIL TIE COMMENTS-HIGHLIGHTED IN El F.The Facility shall be enclosed by a site-obscuring secured fence not less than six feet in height with a locking gate. Nc barbed wire or razor wire shall be permitted. a The support tower foundations.equipment shelters,cabinets or other on-the-ground ancillary equipment shall be busied below ground or screened with a site-obscuring secured fence not less than six feet high.The requirement for a site-obscuring fence may be waived provided the apsllcant has secured all on-the•ground ancillary equipment in a locked cabinet c esig Tied to be compatible with and blend Into the setting, and the means of access for the support tower is located a minimum of 12 feet above the ground. H.All support structures)far w reless oonmmuriicatlon antennas shall have their means of access located a minimum o eight feet abovethe grafirid unless the requirement for a fence has been waived- 1-The support tower shall meet the rn inirrluin primary structure setback requirements for the underlying zone. J. Support towers shall not be permitted inside`s publiO,P Fk,public rnor ument or private holding located within a py`biic park or public monurnent. K.The height of the support tower ot,entenna array aboye.grade shall not exceed the maximum height Identified in Table 2*1.20-11b ip►iu-The height of a support tower shall Include antenna, base:p d end other appurterna[ices end shall be measured from the finished grade of the parcel- Table 22.120-1 —Tower Height Limitations Zone Antenna Array Support Tower R-1,Single-Family Residential Estate R-2, Single-Family (Residential Suburban R-3,Single-Family Residential Urban 2 feet above the zoning I eight limitation or 1B feet f0 feet R^^ ial-Urt above existing structure $ ,M, fesMFiden4tiaultifamil ns t m it' # ecident=al tidigh¶Dortaity Resider:alai Mixed Use mute€.+;MUG)_ . 1Corridor Mixed Use (CM1J) 1.0 CIA 2O17- GS Dearl 113118-100B1LI TIE COMMENTS-I-11G II LUG HIED IN 1111 Table 22.120-1-Tower Height Limitations zone Antenna Array Support Tower CiLy-Gente4GC) CieFeen-014404G0) 20 feetabove the zoning Formatted Table OffiG0(CI} height limitation or 16 feet above existing sinicture Neighborhood Commerdal (NC) mniunity Regional Commercial(RC) 20 feet above the zoning 20 feet highef than the maximum height ellOwedin'the Light-Industrial led Use height limitation or 20 feet zone or SO feet whichever i (irg U-1) ElbOVe existing structure less" 1-Loavy Industrial(I-2) An additional 20 feet In height for each additional antenna array co-located on the support tower, up b a maximum tower height of 100 feet.including the height of Ell antennas 22,120.060 LandecapIng, Refer to Chapter 22,7p t\o'fmc EDI'Landscaping requirements applicable to the underlying zoning district 11 CTA 2017-13005 Draft 1/3{18-M❑EEUTIE COMMENTS-HIGHtIGHTF-O DRAFT Chapter 22121 SVMC-Small Cell Deployment 2j21.01O Overview. In order to masa a Its ht of-ra In a t nughtfui manner which balances the need to accommodate new and evolving technolonies with the preservati n of the rel end aesthetic enyjanrnent of the City While cgcnnlyinn wittaie regiuiretr' nts of state and federal law the Cit d❑ is circ t 121 SVMC forikif ell vjmertt ct smell cell erid X11 technoloev Servicr: providers+.w s ::ee4 to u1llrz= he ,trblic ' -of•+nla t,r amall cell deployment In order in projids wireles .p.mm.nlcalion,data lrensmist len or other relatod serviceto_the citiz=n of the Ci .; ;fir race v=lid frericlii a to provide I e reelfic service seeking to ulilize the a r i:fell dept in Entities with frau hFses who wish D utilize a small cell de lo me r de or e d their existng serwlces shall utilize thencoccesses set forth in rta '6r 22.121 SV C and i' ` menlin s II cell Flo deploy Weir technotcor and obtaii erasion app./oval of speblpginstallaliena. A. Nolhirti in a ter 22. S vises ❑r dire ii sl-es the rir}hSs arid olali alioas of en existinp franchise. R. The tare' `small * I . .1. m r':, 11 frit`de he delgo,mens of small cell facili micro ells and:foal .-rr:'s ars:c grin/d by RCW_3Q.36.37h as stow ado.ted or -re a • r yin n': _ ' _ lC nierrt cleinep which rearu1! SEPA review friar these proce?8es only InetiOnclIon w•ii`h SEPA review. 22,121,015,AcIrj)jnistralign, The r.Manager is eliasgpd with admili 1Y.,4 of s r- cell de+14 ii ant •errnitti ■,and other +Wrntnss comnr4rni Iion.repr[1Ces s establishR4 under chapters 22.120, 2,121,66422.122 SVMC. ti.:. 2.121.020$" lCell[5cr to ant A. Small Cel[Der to erlk, +olits-of-\NaV. Small cell deployments In the publicnghts of-way.stall only beifr6:61 Jptprsuant i. to a �+�lid franchise with the Q,ityf, and (2) in comallance with all Feder 1,stale. and l rzal mall cell,permlttlno rewirernents. B, Small Cell Deo4ovnrents qulsiide of Riohls-of-Wav gall cell deplgyments outside of thepubic riohls of wav shall oat made made incamnlrance all federal.slate.and local small celloerr'nitlilla reguiremaats. 2.121.03 rar hfse lloatlon. A Franchise A.pliQtion. Ser+rice providers that desire to deploy sm i l',cntl deployments 12 cr.'',2017..0 05 Graft i f3/1$-MOI3lLlTIE COMMENTS•-HIGHLIGHTED IN- Ln t,dl'allcjjghts-caf-wey -hall a. I f■: a fra chl se r' the eft r nchlse a form and submit a fee deposit commensurate with the estimated adrnlnistfwe costs of p o s inp n apPialiSin fora franchise" Servicgsgoviders seekag to ull laze City lights- of-way for mall cell deplavments shells cify peopraph c boundaries tar the small tl1 dp10 ent described in the application end a detailed faliematios and visual rendefin+s• he .ro'oseci acihitiesto irized. Pia--• develo• s ist-rrittedacid int applicant Isjincourared to specify. at least the initial small cell del:001e1'1t In Its aoplica on" B. Designation of Facilities. .11 =.Olican s r Iran i -_= i d to utiliz• mall cell deotiwmerq shall o'avide the .ollowin• information, + ffh french-.=-s that seek to utilize a small cell dello rent Io ex•and aseLst ant =r - 'stirs, fro iso ma. *rovide t r orrriation as a tart of small .i.•;1' =.aril a•+licat'& or smell WI deployment. e a lig all s Boil Ii the fracic a ',cation: t. whelper and where small cell fecilities are•prorxli_led to be I 0 on existing util.t'y+I�ples; 2. whether end where srr ati cell fa,cilties..€tre proosed to be 1pcaled ort replacement utility poles. riew les, to-Wars. andlor b}ter structures and the Ilene of replac.ernent t�cles to b t stalled: 3. the co It d uit nd{o:..1 d•rrtiouri;e■ e,u r 3E nRr asa for e r• mended for use in r s all ,•,n i ILL re ardie-s 'o al facilities anti=to be constructed try the :.- icaritoi",'usedfrorranfrastru«ii - •rovider an faclli u is ,+:b for or s`'A. h • the a.*licab a federal review time periods u ty..gel :"a.elkIble 1 or g:`. collo -lion. Skii0A Review. An a li 'ri for a fr Ise which 22ntalns an el eJgnt which is not exerrii '#ccr SERA. reg €t> l. imullaneo s submit a environmental checklist pursuant to c1apter 43X11: G4^! r ha ter 21.20 S IC. Cornplcterrass" .Thee City Manager shall review a mall cell franchise aroticeettioLfr completeness hitt.notify tshr;$ a■dant +wwihir` 30 des of submission ether the ap0licatllbn ilr;t.e;.pl led, however. #hat en applicant may consent to a c itragit coriitleteness review .$service provior ma resubmitan a Iica eIerrn[ned to be thorn plete wtthinM days of(dice by tine City Manaber, Failure.to resubmit en ,apolication with,the SO dal'period shall b• I= ed a wi iI+rawal of that a*ilicalkm. No application shall the deemed corp telewithou he fee de+*sit= b the Cit +-raider. Small Cell t"s rmIl A Ilc ton. A. rat smell emitta 'on and [ren&isea l,cali• 13 CTA 2017-6045 4)raft 11311E-MOBIL 74E COMMENTS-HFGHLIGITrE0 1H Bights cranked under the franchise fgrcon inn°installation,and placemer11 of small cell facilities shalt J-nolemented throh the iss4mnce of arrilts- The franchise application niav be accompanied by cille or more cgfrcurrenk 8pplle2lions for a small c t permit to dY small cell Sr _noel! •erl'nite.yication. As I- tc=ll iermlta•*1' ion shallco :1 the folio,• 1. ' I small I -cikt sites s14•lI be s ecified. ' ❑341 slt-s Ir Iasi-elk* in one small ce permit eppliatipn for processin.. 'he as*: ■n shall lndyle sufficient inform ion about each site and Wilk, In order For ih= - to deter i e that Itcorn■ii:- S I17e lesion standards set forth In SVMC 22,121 2. If the application incudes small cell eoloyrnant in the public rights- l-way, a copy of the franchise application of eferen to approved'existing franchise stjLbe Included. Apiual f•wl6. install a small Pell.deployment shall be continent upon approval of a small telt irlinchlse or the oosseskfigta valid small cell franchise. • a If more than one prwirdigiOn for a salt Bell eines i submitted t. arra I lea nk they shall be considered pn theca*rs ivied. If nitAlj k10'applications pre submitted gn Elie same date, the applicant stall iridr:ate'which pplidaApp shat be considered frst. • 4. Arrw' elerrip. ref ;.ftLcYme t which•qualif'es es.either an elk i'► • ad ides r-.Lest + a o d .- off• . CPiVbe s+eci •=tl lesi ri w'i.b the as i .nt and rutin $dressed se•ara = b the'=. t Man °In order fs m 1 with the licabte processing reoulrerneF -estab)ished byral law, stale law, and chapter 22.122 • • SVP/IC. ti .!is .-as.li6ii C,4si o g j all ce ! it which .I!rims an ele w tilcli IS's ex PA r it4 h_zirsultaro:k.. sl submit an environmental checklist pursuant-'' ¢ apter 13.24 CUVg`-- ter 21, S/111C. _ 6. The takolLcant shall-AIN-114 a sworn declaration under penalty of penury lrsaped by en RF Engine' ytrjth kn■ ,i-d.e of ih- ,roil*sed + ■'=K if tha h small cell dei mens wrll bel " +wi all FCC aro other a icable connectio ° h urnal: re to ra a eels e • cions for eve,p4 frequency at k'hi the small cell fa ' and as 'eted wireless backhaul wvi o rate. An existing franchisee I in for a em 1I cell ermit f r small cell d lG merit shall av'de an RE ce if cation For all acifities Incsu ed in the de rnent. 7, The applicant shall orovlc_e,procf of FCC and other requiatory approvals reelul red to provide tht servicetsl tsr ut ze the techigyzies sought Itc_pe Installed. 14 CTA 2017.0005 Drat]/3f 11i1—MJt4BIIJ TIE COMMENTS—HIGHLIGHTED IN Nu 8- As aisp]icabte,the applicant I hall provide wpWn proof$gm any t1RI%provider authorizirifg the appllicanl to Lie the utility provider"s utility colas for a smati cell depiovment, cam+letersessSmall Cell A!it oa io s. The Ci aria.er_ atl review t31n a POti=.etion for completeness and notify ttse a• Lithin 3D d s of sub l •-ion wheth r the r• cation i, •k•m.late • • '•ed h■ ,a er that a a..Iicant 1, consent to a different completeness rev€sw,,,period- A service rovider ms resub0iit ars a icatian d elerrnined tg be Incompita witl l.n_gQ days of Mice by the City Manager or dell ne Ediure to result sL7it an apolil;ation in a timely manner shall be _earned a wilhdrawal_!f that a licatl[sn, No a ii eliors 5helll be de rued corn 1e . ut the lee depS►sit set by the City Manager- D- I a Cit Mana.er me •.rove den . ,+ •ilionali =4 rove = 'or en +• ion of he sites • •.osed in the small cell ■-rrnit •n. 22,127.050 Small Cell Franchise and P4rrn11 Review process, The_follnvingpr€syisionSrelata,laviewDta lic€m.fa;)a_forafrays• fir: all Il ersnit for smaFl ll deDloymerits- A Review ofFacilitles. ;_ 'e~v of fir It bon 1'.i ed a the e•+1• nt s i all ID2 a ovenned • the rovisi•s of A U-S 1253 <47 U.S. '7;832 end a..I icable casa le e. pIicaimts for Iran ,_ `'_,s t _ I. t=` ll •e.si :: 'ihrrih i : -men1 the anehise std be treated in a •ir,a`: five •.,aulral amt t.,a=5 [ " _ s� mann-.r with o .r service u providers ilizsn. s ¢� in Irti`raj,ucture ,Aig Is func[io+ aiiV e0uivatent,thaatIs,5®rviee • • iders w .e tad a,e EImita y si s_4.e-ci in terms of structure, placement or cu s talo A;. ,,; ;a. Fr`ltIa is... it : tsali I aerr'n ad review uncis chapter 2.121 Al C-$ :r. either .rtimhihit iri+.,...6„Ye' i'- effect of I rohlbitina the ability of an a. ir-:F. -Ie provide`elecomrnt.icatlons£? s B. Desmgri #evlew_and ConccaIrien. Small cel[ la has shall CAnforits to d r n end mance lmerif: dards a sub eat- desl n r was se h lr Vduti 22-121.0 C Franchise a.40).1F aiii hires shall be a•ar■vecl In the form of a Cit •rdinancs and franc ises ma -•:-.0%11 156'a •roved b - CIL Co di .urstpa k to Its s'arldard i an a ravel =' rovide howevert the Ci all meek a Mica federal or state time pro si inre rJ.iren to in review` _ and a ;n or d irs a Tranchl5e eppflcalion. p Other conditionsa eeel, roval at a franchl semal#cell arldfcr o er caval r'1 r-Hoed In alter 22. 1 SV C -re conidlti• ed on H-Lfol[owinq re4ulemersts: 1. Satisfy all applicable + 1 tea uirea:n•-induct' , •ut no [i -• •theisl,ipise, light,end -n other a. i :Pk-I+11 • re•.uire =nS- 15 iCIA 2017-4I{s Drab Vans T Reim ant COMMENTS-HIGH LIOu TED IN 2. Provide written *roof F he a..royal of tli: owner of an utility role far the Icstall on of Its facllit n suchlitysge. Approval of a jranchlse does not authorize attachment to CIty-ogrled utility poles or Miler structures. 3. Urrless /min call ■ravided for in a rarrchlse dotal a !ease from the Citio to rrtikize the City's rirou nd space for the InstQl- 'on of an n9 •.Ie a re .cement util it pole over 60 f t or to locate any new clroUnd bas strudlure.Mase station or other attend?' • i.rrrentor 'ti ri•it-of-we or Ci, •ro•ad • 4. Comb wi h a.,licab'e Ci a.•roval rocessi {or the coIocation of facilities, or the festa la-on of an - , or re•lacertlent al4 v path art the riakit•o!- ray:eu Comply with all Ciltysongtruction sta arcs and rat t and federal s when open-titling ir)j ie right-of-way a d obtain a re,. ted .errn:t t€a =; •r the m ht-of '2, 21-060 Deslstn a d Cance al meui sial dards, Srnakl 1 facilities shall be instal d us' • s ea ?rrorlk truant tethlti Jay-Stealth o concealment technol•• a+slit 9`': 1 small cal f';11 'ies lncudi •, wrtfhout limitation antennas,tow f and rima a tit sure For an mall cell tacitly. stealth or coinmelment technology means :both exis ' • n future to n to throu h which tine small c-III 'li `s des• a►# rese. +.- •r blend. •an ob'ect which is.beady ;resent .i he local -i i ,'anent SLr s a B=Ilii or Iran' signal. tt also j rltrdes: �,:,• A.For those millions Of small llft:clkit,es . r-I to or +.rt 4 I'•lit *ewer Ethel or other ••lam• . . ypr'new ojes frstcc rated wtOtli tl.o Fie unless techrlscally infeasible- New poles F. Itra subject.ti nyoupljcable City r,industry standards; -:Tor axis i, •o=s Inge 'Abed i-Ito the ex sting design of Iliapole to' 1ifeh ` is attached external etion5 .limited in size and scope to the greatest extent tech nigelly( Il•C"E kble,Includido:tn tnotlimitedtobeingasflasliasOosSit,Ietothe poke oat proiectlniginvrh••Than fifteei eel verlicalJy above the polo and hawingsrchliectural corrtpatibl Illy wit 3 J pole' xternal orotOc igga shall be palrr ed a color to resemble end a cola that they appw ar to he"1bart:0 the pole, Shall conform'td tri structural standards so as not to degrade the structural engineering of the pole to which it is attached; 5. Shall ns -11 erre re wi:h ! , al use for wh. h the .ole i$- tended lnciu' r� but not t,d to bfockinti :n- HIM from Ili'hi roles interred t with lower lin-s on • -r poles,and ob urine any porton of the acolIca e s n-face on signs;and 6.Antennae.fer small cell .cilities shall b e coated Inside of gp antenna ericl4suze no more than three cub- at In volume • ' he case of an ntenna that has exposed elernefitS. the antenna nd atf aF fts exposed demerits could fit within en imaginary enclosure cif r10 more theme cubic feet 3.6 CTS O17-DUG5 Craft f 3{18-MORIr.i1IE COMMENTS-H1GkLIGHTEO IN in H. Prima :. uta meal='closures shall be to loner iha _eventee:n ■• feet In vdv nm,e. The following aslociated =.u•i tient ma •• acated i..t.-•- the •rima equipment enclosure and IF slo caterf are not Iriduded fn ltio iodation of eaulPmenl volume_ electric meter, concealment, telecomm dernercallol box, groprid-teased er�closures, baste b.a. • a+ r - a erns. •rou/din. es uI k rrtenl <sliver transfer switch.and uu¢aff ch. Pri at es ui.me t ::closures shat : e buried be ■w .round or +cited and integrated into the surroundlnt. to the meximu -:tent Feasibl=. his shall irciude incorparalincp the facilities lnt4 the base of a.: sole lnfe•r. • into exi tin' :arra d; • Moos, such as garbage containers or other 1•t„or bo :_ a • •r se of 1- :rials and colors that blend Into the urraundiri• -=,in.. Grow:4:�.C. urxted faciities shall no to I+ le-d in an ire• a+ied street or --dewalls. Gro n +x%J ed aci1'.ies shall notbca led in a stormwaler aclll f atciniw s alesr C. For sm lal ,cell facitilbas meunted on 6.ormore b Aldi:r fa s. stet! r ponreaMmerrt technology meart yse of Old 6rjg materials s'- that the f 'I- has prchiteciural oompatlbliit' will.'ane buildiri4:ft shall be mounted iSti.O.wall or an exist rr e•. lrjildini i a configuration as flush tote wall•eslteohn;_ sib shall ri eCt more than three feet above he wa.l on which itis moiled C1.,4dvertislnshall nes be located on any °sill I r e l I fa it irowev r h owner of the small cell facility shall ola*AnIdirolfication 1541.e indlatine the name c wireless service prpvider,and ateleplione nutrili r.iorernorelr,;-r contact on the site. .,.Vp artificial [ph ether blot]jniose require,•- t� M cr niher applicable authority shall be permitted.Any 5 cvriTy Iinh:s Shall be clOvieri-sliieliad. F. Si II c_:, = -I ies halm' . 'titt'ri the rt 1 0;•wa shall n -et the rnInirum primary stnJdur- ,_gym='. ' uirem pts for the t`U terl 't zone, G. Sm hell citifies l no`be errnir d 'nside a Le •c park, public monument tr private!print located wr .a rk or ublic urgent. 22_121,070 Shtl° .Cell Pe 9.v_rid Minor Deyiatlons, A- The Cit • ' a.er sI ,i :review on :tions for small cell i er i s fix small �tl d ments a ed Is The City Manager ma'r autho minor dev:i• s th• -gall cell r-rn .m the dimensional deslcrt and c❑rrceelmenl technotorleifirefe-enced in the exhibits to the franchise or design slandardq where •u deviation tecessa to -Il• the as ill o .row:+e ...vera•e and ie - such devtat on does not a'eriall diffe sm the CVL desk n and sancealnnenl standards. B. Deviations in the dimensions or volume of small cell facilities which do n►texceed the crrmulatiye total provided by the definition of a small cell or mlcrocell faculty in RUIN 80.•a8.37m hell be considered a minor deviation• ro d however fee do npl defeat the . -=lment f- = ures se $ Ci % •e er-Ill ay.licabl; •-Sign an 27 CIA 2017-0003 Draft 1J3f18 MOBILI1IE COMMENTS—HIGH LUGIITED IN Den Deal merit etgndards. C. Sural, -II .ermits to• 7.III facilities inctu.',i e.*royal of minor ieu ations shall be +rocrassed +Nithirt 6111 .a of re•= . of a comsIete -'Flrcation en, .incl a.+r+ al of a franchise,Michever occurs last. 22,12t.0B0 Significant Deviations, An re+[Jest for s' cant deviatiolorn the acro -d small cell facilities design designated ir,the franchise 11 cell emit r C' 's d n s andards shall be re uire 2 mr_d"itional use hermit ands1 it tae considered u d rovisiyns of chapter 22.120 SWAG and pursuant to the Iwr relines .Q ■ ish . id 22.122,0 I and SVM p 1122.040. A significant devi jorf is nota sub, .a 'cran':e, .Pee Atrpend-a off, f th,e SVN%C, ;2,121.0a Compliance with State Pros6ssinelPro Limitations. Review of franchise and sma1 cell permits shah comply with the provisions of ROW 3{,99 0 ADDI.cati ns sh 11 krs reviewed.ccarnpleLerress determined and the timeframe tolled es provided Inns peer 22.12:2 SVC.MC. • • • • • • • • • • • 18 CTA 2017-0005 Draft Ong-roc bum COMMENTS-1-ItaRUGHT10 IN I. DRAFT Chapter 22.122 SVNIC-Wireless Communications and Small Cell Facility Review Periods, 22,122.010 PurOose. Congress an• the Federa „Ammunt - sLS Corornission have, ilhoH ty ranteil s C.253c .arii 47 U.S.C.3_32ra),rag oLutr,i,local governments to act on .6%6reless cc irnu libation facility.appy 'EMs with r-isbilebt tfricid or -1.1 and hay. established limelocaleNg _Pana1e. e r 'tonSlate aasire also adopted similar lmitLions under the roiisonaor0.1Tierjter.35,P0 RCW, r.i, firEjwi City adopts the rollowiatt time limits for review otobtlicatigiiMor bie facility requests, small cell permits, and other approvals (of_scrvioe rovidr of 22,122.020 ties Request_ Jippljcation Review. 1. Appl- ion. Th- Cit Manna- shall *re E and nick: •ublict availabte rEJ i360p form whim shalt be lid to the -int nnatithe City to consider whether an abOlication is Eireliqiblelores,tqg2§ application Iraq P-1.9.11 !Duke the apeticant a need or business case for the proposed modification: 2, Type of Review, u on receipt a li ion for an etioible facilities reQuest the City Manager shall review such alaio to determine tietler the aophcaligp qualifies as an eligible facilities rawest. 3. Tilrefr mo for Within tit days or the date on WW1rsuwna suhmits a complete eli Ctibl facilitesr..suest as Ica Doi the Ci :ns'er Ghat 2 .rove the unlass LI date in s that the aticatioilisSco 22.122.02a 4. Toiling of the Tinefranne for Re w. The 6f3-dsy revIew period b'epinJp to when the complete applicationolled only riiutual arEemellt by tliQCitv Meriai.er and the am licant or i -es wh e he Cit -.gaper dete if*es ital the apolication !is income. TIa tirriefram for review 01 an Eligible Facilities Reauest Is not talked by a moratorium on t revievitof ions. a To lolltia tirnefrarra for Incornotateness, the_ ice.17 Marr shall providewriltan netica to the acolicard 1thn 30 dauof racipt or it' 21t-glipli, invents or inr atign requiredigrahitman . 10 (TA 2017-0(X5 Draft 1/3/18—Mo81IJTIE COMMENTS—HFGFH(,IGl#TED IN b.. The tingefrerne for review b-'Ins ru i_ • algin wh-n the a*i i .n makes a cornplian!suap`e.rneaitst ubrnisslon En response to the City Managers notice of f ncompleteriess. c. FQItowin a supple nentai submission the City Manager s]e I otif the appllcflt within 10 days If the supplemental s4ihmisslon did not provide tag fnfe ation notice delirteatin rissl formation. imeframe Is toll ed in the case of second or subsequent notices pursuant to the procedures Identified in p roralrh 4 of this sectL Second or subseouent notice❑f Incompleteness nnay nol sped missinct di cements or I[jermation that wapnl delineated_In the original notice of 'incompleteness. beterrainason that App1catit+n is n.otartEl Bible Facility iiepuest. lr.tie City Manragar determiries_lhat theepolleant's rectu ! does not qualify as an eligible facilities reouestt the t`_ e .erica pstablished +Y the as dicable s ate or feder=l law and chapter 22.122 SV C b•0 is run from eissuance ■ft e Cit Mai-•era decision r:tthe as•l '.n Is nol n eb ibte f lines r uest. To the extentgdditional information Es necessary. the Ci Mara rna r u t suck inforrai from the apalicant to e+yelU the apDlicativn under other pa) isfons 22.12Z SVIVIC and applicable C. Failure to ' i. En the ev.n the Cit Ma -.f r fads to a++rove or deny araoues1 for an eiigikilefacilities reue within.the imeframe for review faccounIirsg for any tolling). the re.uestshall be deemed !ran -d. The deem-d .rant doe-n■t become eflechie tri the eppiicant ❑tifies thl Cit Macias er in wrilin! ..`:er the revi, 'od has aired ...unIjri . an tollin+ :t the at li►,, lot has beet .,emed*cal .d. 0.Pen-edies, Both 1he ap•■.cant and th-Cit ma brie!, lai s relates f Section 0409 a of the, r }'_Act to any cost of connpelerlt risdieffort. 72.122.030 Collocadon. Eli.ib e r Llocations shall be rooesseF 'thin 90 da of receipt of a complete a*siii^ -■n. The s Nip ria! - II noti 1 e -i.iicantwithin20 days of receipt of an a lication wh ther l i corn lets if additional irtf..orrnatirin Is_required- Tterm poi location shall not apply o the initial is enl of a small cell facility on$ �pole or on any other base nation or +l:er that we r h construct•i or the sole ,f 'rima purpose of an FCClicense antenna aln��ik eir associ etpd facilities. 22.122,040.New Wireless Co-nrnunica#ier Facilites, New wireless ..iirnunicatio adlides shall be processed „'hin 150 da s . erael+t of acam e a tic do The Cit ,2,r]ager shall pay the applicant wilhin 20 days of acei.t of - a'.licatiorx_J+ later it is coil■ele or If addittoI al'nfownati+r is re.ulIed. 20 CTA 2017.401)5 Draft 1/M8 -MOBELIE E COMMENTS-HIG}IL1(+HIED IN= DRAFT Chapter 17.$0 17.80.030 Assignment of development application classification. A. Assignment by Table_ Lard use and development applications shall be cassihed pursuant to Table 17,60-1 below Tecate 17.80-1— Permit Type and Land Use Application SVMC Cross` Type Land Use and Deveioprner1l Application Reference Accessory dwelling trills 19.40 Administrative determinations by city manager or designee Multiple or building official Administrative exception 19,140 Administrative Interpretation 17,50 1710 Boundary line adjustments and eliminations 20-a0 Building permits not subject to SEPA 21_20.040 Floodplain development 2130 Grading permits_ 24.50 Typs l Home business permit 19.55.100 Shoreline letter of exremplion 21.50 Record of survey to establish lots within a binding site plan 20.60.040 Right-of-way permits 22.13+0.100 Site plan review t9,130 I Small cell permit 22,12t 22_'122 Temporary use permit 19,16 Time extensions for preliminary subdivision.short 20,30,060 subdivision,or binding Site plan Alterations--preliminary and final subdivisions,short 20.50 subdivisions,binding site plans Type II Binding site plan—preliminary and final 20 50 Binding site plan—dnange of conditions 20.50 SEPA threshold determination 2120.060 Shoreline conditional use permit 21.50 21 • CTA 2417-01:05 draft 1f3f18—ty1091UTIE COMMENTS—HIGHLIGHTLD IN MI Shorerine nvnvottforrning use or structure review 21.50 Shoreline substantial development permit 21.50 Shoreline variance 21.50 Short subdFvialon—preliminary and final 2030,20,40 Preliminary short subdivision,binding site plan—change of 20.30 conditions Wireless communication facilities 22-120 Conditional use permits _ 19.1E0 Planned residential developments 19.50 Plat vacation 20.70020 Type III Preliminary subdivision-,change of conditions 20,50 Subdivisions—preliminary 20,30 Variance 19,170 _Zoning map amendments(site-specific rezones) 19.30.0 10 Annual Comprehensive Plan amendments(text and/or map) 17.S41140 Type 1V Area-wide zoning snap amendments 17.80,140 Development Code text amendments 17.80,150 EL Assignment by City Manager or Designee- Land use and development applicatans not defined in Table 17.60-1 shell be assigned a type based on the most closely related application type by the city manager or designee,unless exempt under SVMC 17.s0,O10,When more than one procedure maybe appropriate,the process providing the gretilest opportunity for public notice shall be followed. C.Shoreline Letters of examptian,shoreline substantial development permits,sho-e[ine conditional use permits, shoreline variances,and shoreline nonconforming use or structure rdwie sha'I be processed Rul`suant to the procedures set forth in Chapter 17,80 SVMC,'subjed to any additional or modified procedures provided In Chapter 21.50 SVMMC, Shoreline Regulations, including submittals,completeness review, notices,hearings,and decision . D. mall cell pe€truss and wireless communi on facilities shall be processed pursuant to the • +.--,dur• set r.i In cheater 17 SU SVMC a sept as may qtapaiv1se be reguirgd_ ursuant to federal and stags taw.includin t u not limited to 47 ti.S.C.k 1455(a), iSectiork 640901 of the Middle CLass Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 20121 and chapter 35.99 RCW- Cheoter 22.122 amp specifies applicable time par ,ds for review andprccesslna a 31'aibletr. 'l L.:- re■uesls co Ir -aims smallcEt Permits a a "IBW wireless communication facilities. PE. E=xcept as provided in Table 17.80-1,change of conditions for permits snail be prccessett the Berne as the original parrnit type, 22 ! z ; ( 1 }I 2` \ J. ' . 'w ƒ jc, / /* a .=\ . PPS ' . . .. \�\ \ \) tow' .: -, . . t . z« \% 2\ -9 2 2'• . , < } : \, 7 I\ , <. , • . \\ 2. 2 \ » � jI - } 2 ./. : »- � r � ! .y . � ; y . . . 0.'7_ y � 2 g , . < \ , . i . ,. • k&%2a « 2 , a , »\/ _ ` �2 � ` . a %� _ < . ` k b r © � 14. R Z � , J I . ` J a / II K S� . �m/. � t�� ' . 24:4-, I.,7: = & \. . ] \ \ \/ z� \ . % g � \ , § ,} i rAtt;"'j i! �. ./ . . f ' •- 2P � - . . . � \ lir- v - --'1,...' ` . _ \ < %2 1 a i 4 l ., 1 Y 'll°l 1 _ �'dye fir 5 g .,,,.'4 - iI, I'. }+ iii •r: "max; - {,4, / •- ' a j M r M ti '1.. 1. I • : . ° '- 1101 ' x , A. .° 8r.. .` •j(� �, ` " ' Vit, .. %li "n.it7.i ! .' - — E. e 1 I _-dry ripT • r—r • - , - P .7 -- - --�� ,, " -_ ' 4 s Vi _ ° � s "* ,1 -- •- - - 1. frt • • 1 4 ;Itiff rt • "P I 1111 71. • I. -410, 11 11*--11 u L likka '‘• 014-11 II , - Ir•- • Spokane~ Vecizon Comments Re . Planning Commission Erik Lamb From: Kim Allen <Idrn.allen wirelesspolicy,com> Sent Tuesday, January 23,2018 10.13 AM To: Erik Lamb Cc: Jutei Campos (campos lynxcorrsulting.orgr 'Joel Aro' ,Caro Iynxconsulting,org]; 'Haley Gayer'; Cary Driskell;Vega, Lelah I-l;; Barrett, Donna B Subject: Re: Spokane Valley--Verizon Comment Letter for'Planning Commission tonight Attachments; Fact_Sheet. -_ iretess_Trends_Sep17[1],pdf; ftF expasure,pdf; Why Vaulted Equipment is Not Feesible[1].docx HI Erlk- I have prepared some responses to your questions from the Commission In blue below. I also attach some resource materials for you and the Commission, I will look forward to meeting you in person on Thursday. First, they indicated a desire to limit wireless providers to having too many poles within a close proximity to one another, which could create clutter and block the right-of woy. They indicated a desire to limit the distance between pole sites acid to require collocation if possible when two sites have to be right next to each other. The range of small cell radios is approximately between 500 to 1000 feet,depending on terrain, adjacent objects (like trees and buildings), and the strength and size of the radios. This is typically the spacing of Verizon's small cell facilities. While there is some flexibility in which pole to select,the 250 foot separation requirement proposed in the code could present problems in areas with terrain challenges, few existing poles andfor large vegetation. The optimal height for placement of small cell antennas is between 25-35 feet, Radios are typically placed below the antennas, but above 15 feet in height to prevent public access. Collocation of two carriers on a single pole would be difficult because most utility and light poles are between 25-45 feet in height and there would be separation required between the carriers' antennas. It would be extremely difficult to accommodate two carriers,who each need their antennas in that optimal 25-35 foot height. However, because each carrier's network is configured differently from the others,it is unlikely that a small cell would need to be placed directly next to an existing small cell, The 500-1000 foot range allows some limited flexibility in location of a small cell node. Verizon site acquisition consultants are instructed to select the least intrusive pole in the search area and to try to avoid selecting a pole directly in front of windows or views. 1 Additionally, they indicated a desire to have a minimum height for the facilities so as to limit impact on people on the ground. The small cell facilities have radiofrequency emissions at levels that are equivalent to many devices found in the average home, such as wireless routers and baby monitors. Questions regarding the technical aspects of the radio frequencies used. Federal law prohibits municipalities from regulating the choice of transmission technology. The FCC has preempted local regulations in this area. See New York SIVEi v, Town of Clarkstown, 603 i=,Supp.2d 715 (S,D.N.V. 2009) Radiation levels from those frequencies and the other supporting devices (such as power sources) andpossible impact on people. Srnall cell facilities are fully compliant with the FCC limits for radiofrequency emissions and proof of compliance can be required by local jurisdictions. Whether there was any federal limit on the amount of data that may be allocated to Spokane Valley, There are no federal limits on data that may be provided to a given community. crime statistics with the srparl c*li siites. Verizon is unaware of any issues Involving crime at small cell sites, The equipment is small and out of reach of passersby on the ground. 2 r` Kimberly Allen Senior Vice President, land Use Entitlements and Strategic Planning Wireless Policy Group LLC Box 34628, il75604 Snaffle WA 98124 426-628-26 tib Office kim,aller wirclesspolicv..com This message and any attachments to it may contain PRIVILEGED AND CC NFIDENTIAL ATTORNEY CLIENT INFORMATION AND/OR A1TOI NEY WORK PRODUCT exclusively for intended recipients. Please DO NOT FORWARD OR DISTRIBUTE to anyone else. if you receive this message in error,please contact Kim Allen.at 425-628-2666 or kim.allenC wirelesspellcy.coTn From: Erik Lamb<elamb spokanevallev.ur Date:Tuesday,January 16,2:018 at 9:53 AM To: Him Allen <kirn.a!len@wirelessppllcv.corn> Cc:Victoria Cherlault cvictoria.r.henault wirelesscounsel,com>, 11Ju1e1 Campos (Icarnpos lvnxconsuitingore)" <IcemposC iynxconsultl Barg>,"'Joel Aro' {faro _J+nxronsuAtin .or )"‹jot' lvnxconsultirtg ori>,'Haley Gayer' chgaver klynxcorisuftin ore>,Cary Urlslcell <CDriskell{aspokanevalley-or > Subject: RE: Spokane Valley—Velion Comment Letter for Planning Commission tonight Hi Kim and Julel, I wanted tote you know that we had a productive meeting with the Planning Cormission last Thursday. They did have some follow-up questions and i wanted to let you know these may come up again during the public hearing. I've Included the questions below. First,they indicated a desire to :imit wireless providers to having too many Doles within a close proximity to one another,which could create clutter and block the right-of-way. They Indicated a desire to limit the distance between pole sites and to require collocation if possible when two sites have to be right next to each other_ Additionally,they indicated a desire to have a mir._Irnurn height for the facilities so as to limit impact on people on the ground. We are looking at the legal issues with both suggestions, but believe there is some ialidity to having the providers work with each other if sites are in very close proximity to each other and to require a minimum height so as not to Impact normal use of the ROW. Secondly,there were questions regarding the technical aspects of the radio frequencies used, radiation levels from those frequencies and the other supporting devices (such as power sources) and possible ln3pact on people, and whether there was any federal limit on the amount of data that may be allocated to Spokane Valley, I indicated 1 dad not believe there was any limit on data, but I did riot have any of the other technical Information. i dict let them know that representatives would likely be at the public hearing and so they could ask-those questions at that limo. Further, I will convey to them that we really do not regulate any of the transmission or transmission technology. Finally,a Commissioner asked about crime statistics with the small cell sites, I wondered if you had any information I could provide or that you could bring to the public hearing, 3 Thank you and I look forward to seeing you on the 25th. Erik Erik Lamb I Deputy City Attorney 10210 E.Sprague Avenue I Spokane Valley,WA 99206 (a0€J)720,5030 I efamb+ sfstttisnevaklev.crr! Ili 1-4 TF k Omai6and any ottaeliments may lbwsu ]eetto disclomrw pursuant'La Washington t}'r;Public Record Act,clia,ptor 42.50 RCM. orifldeiitlairty No.tln : The information contained In this email aiid any accompanying nttta2Irrricrit4s) Rntonded only for the use of the Intended reclpkont and may ba cixrrfidentlaI and/or prtwlleRed, if any reader efthla Commuriloatiori Is not the Intondcd recipient,unanthariTeri use,dlsolosure or copying Is strictly prrrhfbtted,and may be unlawfulIf you have received lila communication In error, please immediately notify the sender by return email,and delete dire origins l rn essage and elk copies from.your system. Thank you. From: Kim Alien f iltc.kirn.aLier wlr [esspn[c,corn] Sent:Thursday,Jani.kary 11, 20181:31 PM To:Erik Lamb<e[ambf spolcanevalley.org,> Ce:Victciria Chenault<Victoria.criteftautt@wfre]es5COuirlc �,cQtLP Subject:Spokane Valloy—Verizon Comment Letter for Planning Commission tonight Hl Erik- Victi ria Chenault forwarded your email with a ilnk to tonight's materiels. Vcrizan's comments are attached and we woiJic1 appreciate it if you could forward the tetter to the PEA nninn Com mlkslonens. I also shared the link with AT&T. As you will set?,Verizon has no requested changes to this cote. It 1s entirely workable tirid we appreciate the efficient process that will make it easy to deploy sr-mall cells irk your community, The only suggestion we have]s a request to rethink the small cell prohibition in public parks. i see that provision is a15o present for macro facilities that a-e much larger and more visually intrutsive. Small cells can provide 1)c nefits to park 415ers aril Piave a very minimal visual impact when attached to existing poles and light standards. Verizon will not have a representative at the meeting tonight due to short notice. We would appreciate being added to the distribution list for this item goirlP,forward,as we would typically send someone to the next meetings to answer quast[c>i>s, Thank you for your assistance, Kimberly Allen Senior Vice President, Lend Use Erititlemerlts and Strategic Planning Wireless Policy Group LLC Box 34628,#75604 Seattle WA. 8124 425-628-2666 Office kiE .ellen chruliont 4 ' This message and any attachments to it may contain PRIVILEGED AND CON FIDENTIAI.ATTORNEY Cl_!ENT rNNFORMATION AND/OR ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT exciusiveWy for intended recipients. Please DO NOT FORWARD OR DISTRIBUTE to anyone else. IF you receive this message in error, please contact Kim Allen at 4425-628-2566 or kim,arlen u+lreCess olid .com 5 riz n err 201-7 In 2015, the average smartphone in North.America consumed 3.7 GB of data per month, and this is expected to increase to 22 OS per month by 2021. (Ericsson Mobility REport,June 2016) Around 52 percent of American households are now wireless only for voice service. (CDC's 2016 Wireless Substitution: Early Release of Estimates Flom the National Health Interview Survey,July-December) For 1.hillennlals (those horn Petween 1982 and 2004), the number increases to over two-thirds who live in mobile-only households. That number is another significant jump up from 10.5% in 2006 and 31.6% in 2011. (FCC, Annual Report and Analysis of Competitive Markel Conditions with Respect to Mobile Wireless,Nineteenth Report, DA 16-1061 (Sep. 23,2016) More than 70% of all adul-s aged 25-34 andof adults renting [heir homes were living in wireless-only households. (National Health Interview Survey, 'Wireless Subslitutior: Early Release of Estimates From the National Health irterview Survey, July-December 2016.) In 2016, wireless data traffic reached yet another record high, in all, traffic totaled 13.72 trillion MBs—the equivalent of 1.58 million years of streaming HD video - an increase of 4.07 trillion megabytes over 2015. Over the past two years, data use has increased 238 percent, (2017 CTIA Wireless Snapshot, May 2017 & Based on estimates from the U.S. Cellular Monthly Data Usage Estimate tool, available at htlps:ffwww.iascellular,00rnldataf data-estimatot.html) 2016 mobile data use is 35 times the volume of traffic in 2010. (2017 CTIA Wireless Snapshol, May 2017) There are now more wireless devices than Americans, with about 1.2 devices for every person in the country. That makes the wireless platform needy ubiquitous: 95 percent of U.S. adults own a cellphone. Compare that .o the 78 percent of Americans who own a computer. (2017 CTIA Wireless Snapshot, May 2017 & Pew Research Center, Mobile Fact Sheet" (Jan. 12, 2017), available at http:liwww.pewinternet.orgtfact-sheet!mobilet) Wireless-powered smart city solutions could produce$160 billion in benefits and savings from lower energy use, reduced traffic congestion,and decreased fuel costs. (2017 CTIA Wireless Snapshot, May 2017&Accenture,Smart Cities: I-low 5G Can Help Municipalities Become Vibrant Smart Cities (January 2017)available at Ilttps:ll NON,accenture,cornlus-enriflsight-smart-cities.) Connected devices coulc create $305 biitlion in annual savings for the healthcare industry. (2017 CTIA Wireless Snapshot, May 2017 & David H. Roman and Kyle D Conlee, The Digital Revolution Conies to US Healthcare: Technology, Incentives Align to Shake Up the Status Quo, Goldman Sachs Equity Report, Internet o' Things Volume 6 (June 29, 2015) available at http:// rnassdigitalhealth.orgl digital-revolution-comes-us-healthcare. Self-driving cars could sa,re 21,700 lives and $447 billion per year. (2017 CIA Wireless Snapshol, May 2017 & Daniel J. Fagnant and Kara Kockelman, 'Preparing a Nation for Autonomous Vehicles; Opportunities, Barriers and Policy Recommendations for Capitalizing on Self-Driven Vehicles,' Eno Center for Transporta`ion (2014 available at https,fhwwew. enotrans.orgfeti-materialIpreparing- a-nallon-for-autonomous-vehiclas-eppert; pities-barriers-and- alicy-recommendatious.) The number of loT devices worldwide will conservatively surpass 20 billion by the year 2020, (2) and this increase in connectivity stands to add roughly $2,7 Kim to U.S.. GDP by 2030. (2017 CTIA Wireless Snapshot, May 21017 & Dr. Michael Mandel, Progress,ve Pc-licy institute, Long Term U.S, Productivity Growth and Mobile Broadband: The Road Ahead (March 2016) available http,JJwviw.pragressivepolicy,orglwp-CODtentluplvadsr2016/031201€.03-MandelJ-Ong- term-US-Productivity-Growth-and-Mobile-Braadband_T he-Road-Ahead.pdf) In 2021,virion will account for around 70%of mobile data traffic. (Ericsson Mobility Report, June 2016) Across Income levels, a significant majority of Americans now have smariphones, with 64 percent of people making loss than $30,000 a year and 93 percent of people earning more than $76,000 a year owning smartphones.9 And since 2011, the number of individuals snaking under S3W:100 per year who own a smartplione has grown ' y 42 percent (2017 CTIA Wireless Snapshot, May 2017 & Pew Research Center, °Mobile Fant Sheer (Jars, 12, 2017), available at http,fl ims.pewinternet.orglfact-shee#fmobilef Today, just over half-50.5 percent—of American households only have-a mobile voice conneotion 13 For Millennia's, the number inc-eases to over Iwo-thlyds who live in mobile-only households, That number is up from 10.5% in 2006 and 31.6% in 2011. (2017 CTIA Wireless Snapshot, May 2017 & FCC, -Annual Report and Analysis of Competitive Market Condilions with Respect to Mobile Wireless, Nineteenth Report, DA 16-1061 (Sep.23,2016}} Millennia's lead smariphona adoption, with 92 percent of is-2a year olds having a smartphorie, followed by 85 percent of 30-49 year olds, end 74 percent of 50-64 year olds. Wth respect to race, smariphone ownership cuts across the board, with approximately 72 portent of African-Americans, 75 percent of Hispanics, and 77 percent t whites in the U.S. having smerlphones. (2017 CTLA Wireless Snapshot, May 2017 & Pew Research Center, 'Mobile Fact Sheet° (Jai. 12, 2017), available at http,llwuww.pewintemet,orglact-sheatlmobtile{) Teens have increased smertphorie TV/video viewing 85%in 4 years. (Ericsson Mobility Report, June 2016) Teen usage of cellular data for srnartphone video has grown 127% in 15 months, (Ericsson Mobility Report,June 2016) 76 of 911 calls origin&e from a cell phone (National Highway Traffic Administration, February, 2016) More than 75%of prospeive home buyers prefer strong cellular connections(RotNletrics,Juno 2015) 35%of Americans reach for their smariphone first In the morning (CTIA,July 2015) a Machine-to-machine connections are projected to rise from 36 million in 2013 to 263 million in 2018, (Cisco, VIVI Mobile Forecast. [highlights 2013-2618, at°United States—2016 Forecast Highlights and 2013 Year in Review) By 2020, more than 34 billion Internet-connected devices will be installer globally— that's more than 4 devices for every human on earth, (Businoss insider, May 20, 2016) 5 . . ,„__. _..... , RF Exposure Near the Antenna General population population wi exposure limit within ~5 feet of the antenna horizontally. Safe within this 1 envelope for ~2O minutes and still 1rennin within ��._. �� _ ublipMills. "._ Occupational exposure 1 limit within —2 feet of the 1 antennas. Untrained workers cannot enter Max. ground level li xposurefrom any nod ie safety i .�D 'l rrr cm or 2.1p % general crinin public exposure limit Why Vaulted Equipment Is Not Feasible Sufety: This is the Inain reason not to vault as it poses a significant safety hazard to technicians, contractors and utility crews. - Gas vapors build up inside the vault despite the ventilation systems installed especially when those systems fail.If a tech enters a vault before the air is purged, it could result in serious harm to include death.Von Wireless will not place personnel in this position, - Requires two people to be onsite. One tech in the vault and the other as an above ground attendant maintaining communication with the tech mak ng sure a hazard does not expose the tech to injury. Due to the increased risk, OSHA requires additional and more stringent policy,procedure and guidelines. Construe/4m: - Approximately four time more space is required to vault than installing above ground, o Need to accommodate digging out and placement of backfill as well as shoring the excavation site. o May pose an issue with utility clearance setback requirements. o No access around the vault causing disruption to pedestrians (sidewalk) and traffic (lane closures). o Require&a flatbed trailer tuck and a lege crane with outriggers which have [he potential of interfering with power lines. - Soil Condition—Extensive due diligence is required to test the soil prior to vaulting the equipment titndergroimd to include and not be limited to! o Expansive Soil—Soil Mil "swell' in volume when wet and shrink when dried causing the vault to heave, settle and shift_ o Soil Liquefaction—A phenomenon whereby a saturated or partially saturated soil substantially loses strength and itifl'ness in response to an applied stress, usually earthquake shaking or other sudden change in.stress condition, causing it to behave like a liquid. a Hazardous Waste—Soil that was previously contaminated by toxins requiring cleanup before work can continue or causing the site to be completely abandoned. - Hitting bedrock can prohibit the dig. - Is a longer and more intensive process that takes more time to complete. - 1•n many urban cases, it is not practical due to space eon`traints. Service Reliability: - Vaulting increases the chance for service disruption. - High rink of flooding and overheating damaging the equipment. - It increases the distance between the radius and the antennas resulting in path.loss in the coaxial cable. This in turn reduces the range of the ante:mas. Other: - It is a major expense to build and keep maintained. Photos of'Vault 11amiL+c: _ F.A.ERGENGY p,�l�g y. yr,r.4y3.1a — - .a{ A9ti `N # � • r r t•i P•RfoL"gr.0 ell • µ,p. • L eq r Y•i'.tap• 1.-- 1 uIk ' . f 1 �i f� frare 41i 714 i F _ I 1 ` 1 , I�ir fI ' i i(I) _ i' li. • . ---• J P. . ! Iii. • • • 010, ri r i n ' fir f- `� WIRELESS POLICY VVI'! '11 GROUP Lk H" January 11, 2018 Via Email do Erik Lamb, Deputy City Attorney elamb@spokaneyalley.org Spokane Valley Planning Commission Heather Graham James Johnson Tim Kelley Mike Phillips Michelle Rasmussen Suzanne Stathos Matt Walton Chair Graham and Commissioners: Thank you for the opportunity to provide comment on the draft wireless code before you. Verizon appreciates the city's careful and deliberate approach to revising the wireless code to accommodate small cell technology. V erizon generally supports the proposed code and appreciates how well it addresses the industry's concerns. It is important to get it right in adopting regulations for wireless facilities in a community that is growing as dynamically as Spokane Valley. We are in a period of tremendous growth in wireless data use. To put it simply, more people are using more wireless devices to do more things in more places than ever before. ■ In 2016, mobile data use was 35 times the volume of traffic in 2010. • In 2015, the average smart phone used 3.7GB of data each month. That is expected to increase nearly 6 fold by 2021, when average use PO Box 34625-#75504 kim,allereMirelesspolicy,ca m l 425,625,2666 SeaWe,WA 95124 wiakrAreleupolicy.com f 205,219.6717 January 11! 2O1 Ng 2 is expected to be about 2GB per month, • But it isn't just our phones. Machine-to-Machine cormections are projected to increase from 36M in 2013 to 263M in 2018, That is a 7- fold increase in just 5 years. • This growth is happening because the ways that we use Our wireless data are changing. Our phones are not just phones anymore, They are the remote controls for our.lives And it isn't just Facebook, and streaming video. More and more people are using wireless data to stay connected from any location. • _Devices that have never been wireless before arc wireless now, and require expanding the capacity in the existing network to function reliably. Some examples are smart lights, smart cameras, and smart watches, smart traffic signals, smart trasheans, smart refrigerators, and smart home beating, * Reliable and robust wireless services are essential to effective telecomtnuting, which reduces traffic congestion and improves quality of life. People use wireless service to stay connected with friends and family locally, nationally, and around the we rid. Home automation is allowing people to control lights, appliances, and security vstetns remotely_ Smart Communities solutions are improving safety and allowing our cities to operate more efficiently. • Wireless data is important for public health and safety. 76% of 911 calls originate from dell phones, and it is now common for first responders to use wireless data networks from devices in their vehicles and on their person when responding to a crisis. • Wide ranges of medical devices are connected to wireless networks, helping doctors to more effectively treat their patients. Devices include smart heart monitors and smart insulin pumps. ▪ 52% of American households are wireless only for voice service. More than 70% of all adults aged 25-34, and or adults renting January 11, 2018 Page 3 their homes, are living in wireless-only households. People are using mobile devices more than ever before, and that trend is expected to continue.] With such a pressing need for additional capacity, the city's small cell code will facilitate deployment of this much-needed intiastructurc. Verizon supports the code as proposed. The only suggestion would be to reconsider the prohibition against siting small cells in public parks, set forth in 79_121.060(0) on p. 17 of the draft code. This restriction appears to echo the prohibition on siting towers in public parks. However, Verizon would note that small cell facilities are much smaller than macro facilities and are useful to boost data and user capacity where there are lots of people ,gathered for sporting events, concerts and other similar activities where people are using their phones to sharephotos and video. Publicparks often host these types of everts. The very reduced visual impact makes small cells a good solution for existing lighting or utiility pc [es already present in many public parks_ Thank you for the opportunity to comment and we Look forward to continuing to work with the city to develop a code that preserves the look and feel of your community, while providing an efficient and workable process to deliver the service your residents, visitors and businesses have come,to expect. Sincerely, Kim Allen, Wireless Policy Group, LLC, Representative for Verizon Wireless Enc. L The attached fact sheet contains the sources of the data points listed here. verizorti Vu"i Tree V 2017 In 2015,the average smartphone in North America consumed 3.7 GD of dela per month,and this is expected to increase to 22 GB per month by 2021. (Ericsson Mobility Report, June 2016) Around 52 percent of American households are now wireless only for voice service, (CDC's 2016 Wireless Substitution: Early Release of Estimates From the National Health Interview Survey,July-December) For Millennials (those born between 1982 and 2004), the number increases to over two-thirds who live in mobile-only households. That number is another significant jump up from 10.5% in 20066 and 31,6 in 2011. (FCC, Annual Report and Analysis of Competitive Markel Conditions with Respect to Mobile Wireless, Nineteenth Report, DA 16-1061 (Sep, 23, 2016) More than 70% of all adulls aged 25-34 and of adults renting their hones were living in wireless-only households, (National Heait1i Interview Survey, 'Wireless Substitution: Early Release of Estimates From the National Health interview Survey, July-December 2016.) In 2016, wireless data traffic reached yet another record high. In all, traffic totaled 13,72 trillion MBs—the equivalent of 1.58 million years of streaming HD video - an increase of 4.07 trillion megabytes over 2015. Over the past two years, data use has increased 238 percent, (2017 CTIA Wireless Snapshot, May 2017 & Based on estimates from the U.S. Cellular Monthly Data Usage Estimate tool, available at https:l/wromuscellular.cornfdataldata-estimator,html) 2015 mobile data use is 35 limes the volume of traffic in 2010. (2017 CTIA Wireless Snapshot, May 2017) There are now more wireless devices than Americans, with about 1.2 devices for every person in the country. That makes the wireless platform nearly ubiquitous: 95 percent of U.S, adults own a cellphone. Compare that to the 78 percent of Americans who own a computer. (2017 CTII\ Wireless Snapshot, May 2017 & Pew Research Center, `Mobile Fact Sheet' (Jan. 12, 2017), available at http:ll.pewintemet.orgifect-sheetimobilef) Wireless-powered smart city solutions could produce$160 billion in benefrts and savings from lower energy use, reduced traffic congestion,and decreased fuel costs.(2017 CTIA Wireless Snapshot, May 2017&Accenture, Smart Cities: How 5G Can Help Municipalities Become Vibrant Smart Cities (January 2017)available al httpsi1 www.accenture,comJus-enfinsight-smart-cities,) Connected devices could create $305 billion in annual savings for the healthcare industry. (2017 CTIA Wireless Snapshot, May 2017 & David H. Roman and Kyle D. Coulee, The Digital Revolution Comes to US Healthcare: Technology, Incentives Align to Shake Up the Status Quo, Goldman Sachs Equity Report, Internet of Things Volume 5 (June 29, 2015) available at http:// nrassdigitalhealth.orgl digital-revolution-comes-us-healthcare. Self-driving cars could sane 21,700 lives and $447 billion per year. (2017 CTIA Wireless Snapshot, May 2017 & Daniel J, Pageant and Kara l<ockelman, "Preparing a Nation for Autonomous Vehicles: Opportunities, Barriers and Policy Recommendations for Capitalizing on Self-Driven Vehicles,` Eno Center for Transporta ion (2013), available at haps:Nam. enotrans,orgletl-materiatfpreparing• a-nation-for-autonomous-vehicles-opportunities-barriers-and-policy-recomrrendationsf) The number of loT devices worldwide will conservatively surpass 20 billion by the year 2020, (2) and this increase in connectivity stands to add roughly $2,7 trillion to UI,S. GDP by 2030. (2017 CTIA Wireless Snapshot, May 7017 & Dr. Michael Mandel, Progressive Policy Institute, Long Term U.S. Productivity Growth and Mobile Broadband: The Road Ahead (March 2016) available at hill] rm-U S-Productivity-Growth-and-Mobile-13 road ba nd_T he-Road-Ahead.pdf. In 2021, video will account br around 70% of mobile data traffic.(Ericsson Mobility Report,June 2016) Across income levels, a sigr-ificant majority of Americans now have smartphones, with 64 percent of people making less than $30,000 a year and 93 percent of people earning mode than $75,000 a year owning smartphones_9 Andsince 2011, the number of individuals making under $30,000 per year who own a smartphone has grown by 42 percent, (2017 CTIA Wireless Snapshot, May 2017 & Pew Research Center, 'Mobile Fact Sheet" (Jan, 12, 2017),available at hltp:dfwurw.pewin:arnet,orgdfact-sheethnvbilel) Today, just over haft-50.8 percent—of American households only have a mobile voice connection." For Millennials, the number Increases to over two-thirds who live in mobile-or ly households. That number is up from 10.6% in 2006 and 31,5% in 2011. (2017 CTIA Wireless Snapshot, May 2017 & FCC, Annual Report and Analysis of Competitive Market Conditions with Respect to Mobile Wireless, Nineteenth Report, DA 16-1061 (Sep, 23, 2016)) Miltenniels Lead smartphonv adoption, with 92 percent of 18-29 year olds having a smartphone, followed by 88 percent of 30-49 year olds, and 74 percent of 60-64 year olds. With respect to race, smartphone ownership cuts across the board, with approximately 72 percent of African-Americans, 75 percent of Hispanics, and 77 percent of whites In the U.S. haying smartphones. (2017 CTIA Wireless Snapshot, May 2017 & Pew Research Center, "Mobile Fact Sheet' (Ja=,, 12, 2017),. available at http:fdwww.pewrintemet,org,°fact-sheetyrnabiled) Teens have increased smartphone TV/video viek.'ing 85 in 4 years. (Ericsson Mobility Report, June 2016) Teen usage of cellular data for smartphone video has grown 127% in 15 months. (Ericsson Mobility Report,June 2016) 76%of 911 calls originate from a cell phone (National Highway Traffic Administration, February, 2016) More than 75% of prospective borne buyers prefer strong cellular connections(RootMetrics,dune 2016) 35%of Americans reach for theft smartphone first In the morning (CTIA,July 2015) A Machine-to-machine connections are projected to rise from 36 million in 2013 to 263 million IP 201B. (Cisco, VNI Mobile Fcrccas: Highlights 2013-201B, at `United States--2018 Forecast Highlights and 2013 Year In Review) By 2020, more than 34 billion internet-connected devices will be installed g[abaIIy — that's more than 4 devices for every human on eartl}. (Business Insider, May 20, 2016) 3 �,111R� SS P LLC POLICY W P GROU- I January 25, 2018 Via Email clh Erik Lamb. Deputy City Attorney elarab@spokanev-alley.org Spokane Valley Planning Commission Heather Graham James Johnson Tim Kelley Mike Phillips Michelle Rasmussen Suzanne Stathos Matt Walton Chair Graham and Commissioners: "1'hank you for the opporlttnity to provide comment on the r -viscd draft wireless code before you. Verizon appreciates the city's careful and deliberate approach to revising the wireless code to accommodate small cell technology. While Verizon generally supports the proposed code,there are a few late revisions we would like to address. ▪ 22.121.060 A. Antennae shall be located at decal 20 feet above the base elevation of the grow td unless technically infeasible. Nu objection. • 22.121.060B Primary equipment enclosures shall be buried below ground or locked and integrated into the surroundings unless technically infeasiblec in the Pacific Northwest,the rainy weather makes for damp, and often waterlogged vaults and equipment, which is damaging to electronic equipment, particularly for radios. SEI This is the main reason not to vault as it poses a significant safety hazard to technicians, contractors arid utility crews, P0 Box 34628-#756044 kim.allenwirelesspo .cvm t 425,628,2666 Seatlte, 9a'12+4 www,wirelesspolicy,ccm 1206.219.6717 January 25,2018 rage 2 - t:ra \rrpors build up inside the vault despite the ventilation systems installed especia]ly when those systems fail.If a tech enters a vault before the air is purger.,it could result in serious harm to include€cath.Verizon Wireless will notplace personnel in this position, - Requires two people to be onsite. One tech in the vault and the other as an above ground attendant maintaining common ication with the tech making sure a hazard does not expose the tech to injury. Due to the increased risk,OSHA requires additional and more stringent policy,procedure and guidelines. Construction Apprirnately four times more space is requirec to vauitt than installing above ground. c, Need to accommodate digging out and placement of backfill as well as shoring the excavation site. o M©y pose an issue with utility clearance setback requirements. o No access around the vault causing disruption to pedestrians (sidewalk) and traffic(lane closures). o Requires a flatbed trailer truck and a large crane with outriggers which have the potential of interfering with power lines. Soil Condition--Extensive due diligence is required to test the soil prior to vaulting the equipment underground to include and not be limited to: o Expansive Soil—Soil will `swell" in volume when wet and shrink when dried causing thevault to heave,settle and shift.. • Soil Liquefaction—A phenomenon whereby a saturated or partially saturated soli substantially loses strength and stiffness hi response to an applied stress, usually earthquake shaking or other sudden change in stress condition,causing it to behave like a liquid. o Hazardous Waste—Soil that was previously contaminated by toxins requiring cleanup before work can continue or causing the site to be completely abandoned. - Hitting bedrock can prohibit the dig. - ]s a longer and more intensive process that takes more time to complete. - In many urban discs, it is not practical due to space constraints. Service Reliability: - Vaulting increases the chance for service disruption. - High risk of floodinand overheating damaging the equipment. - it increases the distance between the radios and the antennas resulting in path foss in the coaxial cable, This in turn reduces the range of the antennas. Verizon requests that the uhdergrounding requirement be removed. January 25, 2018 Page 3 • 22.121.060 H Location. Small cell facilities shall not be located with to [2.50,1 feet of any other small cell facility unless the applicant demonstrates that no other location Gem accommodate or is sufficient to meet the wireless service needs, in the event o small cell facility is required to 5e located within 250 feet of another existing small cell facility, the applicant shall make a god faith effort to collocate the grew facility on the sane pole or structute as the exisiltrg small facility in order to m inirsr ize impacts from new small cell facilities. The City Meg reg ire applicaarts to provide evidence of efforts for collocation An applicant may demonstrate good faith efforts to collocate by providing written evidence from the other wireless provider(s) that they are unwilling or II is technically infeasible to collocate, or from pole or structure owners that they will not allow collocation or that it Is technically infeasible to allow collocation. Many pole owners are also restricting collocation by only allowing one carrier per pole. Regardless of the allocators,poles would still need to conform to NEC or NESC code and pass strnetural for all installations. That does become for complicated with additional collocators. It will be viable in some cases, but riot in others. There are already many practical constraints that narrow our pole chokes. The utility providers have pole types that we cannot locate upon_The utility and N ESC code clearances requirements also limit the viability of collocating more than one carrier en a single pole, Our RF engineers are looking for available poles in a very ;mall footprint for each node. The actual distance will vary basal 013 several factors,but moving one node location can have a cascading effect on other nodes, The separation requirement could be perceived as disoriMirvatory, by favoring those who enter the market first and burdening the carriers who deploy later in any given areas as the number of viable and available poles will be greatly reduced, The primary issues with small cells collocation is that the antenna range is short and- variable, The range of a small cell depends on the frequencies being used and the power of the radios and antenna. That range typically varies from 400 ft.to l,O0O ft. It is unlikely that each carriers target range will be the same for any single deployment area, Nodes too c1ci a together will create intetfcrcrtoe. Nodes too far apart leave capacity gaps. fn addition,the places where we need capacity aro different because the locations and ranges of our macro sites arc different. There will be sonic situations where collo catio.-is could make sense, but it will need to be evaluated case by case. Many pole owners are also restricting collocation by only allowing one carrier per pole. Regardless of the collocatora,poles would still need to conform to NECor NESC code and pass structural for all installations. That does become for complicated with additional colloc;aturs.There are already many practical constraints that narrow our pole choices, The utility providers have pole types that we cannot locate upon.The utility and NESC code clearances requirements also limit the viability of collocating more than one January 25, 2018 Page 4 carrier on a single pole. Finally, the proposed language could be perceived to discriminate against carriers who deploy later, by narrowly limiting t' available poles. Verizon suggests that this section be removed and that the code simply state the city's preference that small cells pot be deployed on adjaaont pole. Thank you for the.c portcirdty to comment and we look forward to continuing to work with the city. Sincerely, Kira Mien,Wireless Palley Group,LLC, Representative for Verizon Wircicss F t-tc, Photos of V ult Dam a'c; i,G{.t;.:13". 4 r C' 'Voe ' - 41. � jr,tC I r p ' 1 ti ._,t. i.i ' 1 i '.1171:I tIlli. 1 ii.,l'iii . , -' ili: ' a - . 11111 a ...o '4 „41-1 r`f rg ,. 4 ). iiiiiit i i x..01 0"..3/4 *Mane T-Moblle Comments Re : Planning Commission � DavisCIC t Suit 0304 777 108th Avenue ffE LIR Trernaine LLP Dellevuc,WA 98t1M-3149 Linda While Atkins 1125)646.6115 te1 025)4546-6199 fax lindatkiktelwixam January 25, 2018 Spokane Valley Planning Commission Spokane Valley City Hall 10210 E. Sprague Ave. Spokane Valley, WA 99206 Re: CTA-2017-0005-Wireless Telecommunications Amendment—T-Mobile Comments for Public Hearing Commission Members: On behalf of T-Mobile,we are submitting these written comments on the.proposed Wireless Communications Facilities code amendments for your consideration at this evening's public hearing. We appreciate the opportunity to comment on these proposed changes which address the siting of small cells. Small cells are a particular type of wireless facility installation that are intended primarily to address network capacity needs and management of network traffic, particularly in dense urban areas. Unlike the traditional macro cell (tower) wireless facility which is designed to provide primary coverage to a defined geographical area, small cells are designed to work with macro sites to manage heavy wireless traffic in dense areas in order to provide optimal network functionality and to ensure that wireless customers have access to the high quality and reliable wireless service they have come to expect. In order to ensure that all wireless communications users have access to an optimal network, it is particularly important that regulations for permitting small cell deployment be flexible enough to accommodate a range of small cell locations and aesthetic solutions,and to Billow for technological evolution. Each wireless carrier has small cell designs that are customized according to the carrier's network frequency and design and its anticipated capacity needs. Further,all carriers' technologies are continually evolving. Thus small cell regulations should avoid inadvertently forcing carriers to choose specific technologies or equipment, effectively discriminating among carrier technologies in violation of federal neutrality requirements. Federal telecommunications law requires that local governments manage the use of the public right of way for telecommunications purposes on a competitively neutral and 4841464 1-4427v t 0048172-000795 /uch4th lNe ' k 154MI1e $dam I dIead 5hanph al Lin Anomes Ban Forl 4O Waoinpion,Q.C- www,dwtcam January 25,2018 Paget nondiscriminatory basis. 47 TSC §253. Federal law further prohibits regulations that unreasonably discrimirnatc among providers of functionally equivalent services. 47 USC §332(c)(7)(13)(1). In addition to prohibiting discrimination, Federal law also preempts municipalities from dietatitug a wireless provider's choice of technology and equipment. 5'ee New fork 634-84 LP v. Town of C:/carhstou+n, 61217.3d 97 (2d Cir. 2010), With thesepriacipilcs in mind,we recommend the changes outlined in the attached redline of the draft,ordinance. In particular,we urge the Commission to modify the ordinance to expressly recognize a-unified camouflage design as an acceptable option for small cell design. T-Mobilo has developed this design to incorporate both the amtennas and associated equiptr ent into a single enclosure of approximately three cubic feet in order to standardize and minimize the aesthetic impact of small cell installations. We.include photoLp.phs and more detailed infh.rtnatiou concerning this unified design with our comments. For additional detailregarding our comments,please see the attr.ehed redlined ordinance, and the attached photographs'AT-Mobile's unified camouflage small cell design. "blank you again for this opportunity to comment on the draft wireless facilities ordinance. Very truly yours Davis Wright Tremainc LII' 046 Linda W lute Atkins cc: T-lvlobile 4841-4641-4427v.I ONE t72.94 793 a Th, • 561 11111' , r Small Cells: ForFactor is Important NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT T-Mobile has been working with our vendors to create an enclosure that holds all of our technology. These pictures depict our updated design. We believe it is important to create uniformity and a sleeka . .. 3 design that blends with infrastructure. llo}. - 3n 12.0. ... ,sh-a CAA _ % r l* 7 -_,-y., . J " L..„.„1 _.'. p.-4 awl:2- .4 11 - ' in l Jfi112017 TB • •Mobile W Jranuary25,Z0l8 Re:1-Mobile Small Cell Shroud Size City of Spokane Valley: The purpose of this letter is to provide more details about the size of T-Mthile's small cell shwa This shroud is designed to enclose both the small cell antennas and the primary equipment associated with the antennas,Thus,the rough exterior dimensions of this shroud(3r k 12"x 17.3-1 E.-,ewellbelow thevolurneUio throshmtds established under IA'ashington State law. ROW 60.38.375(2)(4}, With this shroud design the antennas ore el the very front of the shroud(terinest away from the side where the shroud would attach to a pale}.The antennas bale a slim prohla and are attached in front of the radios.The antennas only occupy aoout 2010 of the form factor.The remainder of the shroud contains primary equipment- Under the definition of s"small call facility"In the Washington State stalutes, the antenna enclosure (whether real or imaginary)and the primary equipment enclosure are subject to separate site limitations. See id. The statutory antenna enclosure size limitation is 3 cubic foot,while the primary equipment s ze limitation Is 17 cubic feet. id. The total volume of the 7-Mobile shroud complies with these limits based on the proportion devoted to antennas (roughly 0.6 cubic feet) and the proportion devoted to primary equipment{roughly 2,4 cubic feet).' In addition,although the shroud appears to be an even rectangular prism,there are various indentations around the box. These Indentions are parlor the design end mesh toe actual volume is smaller than the volume calculated using the rough exterior dimensions. It you have any questions,please reel free to contact Marta Emig in our local Seattle Market,at L125-308-1614 or Marie,Emlq T-Mabile.onnt. i As co.itempletaxl under:he statuto,the erten na enclosure can be ee uel or imaginary. 4 17.cOflO-1515v-t O04172-W0795 5pokaneVaIIey,T-¢•13blI'corn mt. 1/22/1B CTA 2021-0005 Draft 1/17/18 DRAFT APPENDIX A--DEFINITIONS Radio/TV broadcasting studio: Facllifes serving the broadcast media, See "Communication facilities, use category." Repoater facility:A Facility.1.-or the noncommercial reception and retransmission Df radio signals See'Communication facilities, use category." RF Engineer: Apersonrni of4ie 4 f la4a er as + t I _ ul1uit,neo AdMakingal un education,trainina and experiencn wireless corn snicatiori sewices, radia n +fl1 frboadJeveanEkOmMlJashd■rd. fre.uencies aid FCC and ether _!.f cable uovernmental regulations to FAro.ide the c.,mantlra ,:ins.rt-asitind br neaessary rtificalion(s)required pursuant to Chapter 22,121 SVMC. Telecommunicationsr The transmission, between or among points specified by the user,of audio andfcrr visual nformalien and data of the user's choosing,without change in the form or content of the Information as sent end received. -Alternative mounting structure; A water tower,manmade tree, cIec1'tower, church steeple, bell tower, utIity pole,light standard,freestanding sign, flagpole, or similar slructuce designed to support and camouflage or conceal the presence of telecommunications antennas. • Antenna:An =xteriiam eel watus deli.ned for tele'to tiic radio data Interne or other cor rntinlcalons through the sending angor recetvinct of radio frequence signals- including, ignalsincluding,but riot limited to, equipment attachedto a tower,pole,light standard.util.ty . • {Fcriaattad:nichligrrt _} +v1- • idin. or other sruciurefor the in •rairidin Wireless s=rvic . T .-sof antennas include: -.An"mini-directional antenna'receives and transmits radio frequency sl opals in a 3Sn-degree radial pattern; -A"whip ante nfia Is an ornn'i directiona! antenna that i5 uP to 15 feel in height and no more than inches in diameter: end -A"directional or panel antenna"receives and tre7nsmits radio frequency signals in a specific.dlrectioral pat/gm of less than x+30 decree&-A-atruat rrc rrr device 4.1&^s hest-e€roriatc radio,totoviaion a;a x including direct •-•- • • • r dctics, and,.,arnrii-aiir. •-•- = - -. - tiudi -saL4Fte tolcvidion, Antenna Height: The velice]distance measured from everane buildino elevation to the hiuhest point rrfthe antenna. or if on a rooftop or tithes.stn dole. f?om the top of the roof or struicttire to I e ishest taint of the antenna. For rerlace e t structures antefna_hei!ht Is measur . from the top of the a istingstructure to the highest point of the antenna or new structure NItitheve realer. 1 1482.0,2473-6858v-3 CO2181,72:0079 I kane Valle -rulal He - .art 1 2 rA 2017-paps Draft 1/17/18 •A• •roved small call iactlat n small cell acltlt that has eoeiv-• ail r-•uired permits. •Array:An arrangement of antennas and their supporting structure. .ease Station: A structure or eouipmentat a fixed loo tion that enables FCC licensed or authorized wireless corrsmunications between user equiorrient and a communications network. The term does nol encomass a to aas defined herein nor anerr i aryl associated with a tower- Ba se Stati on I:ndudea without l'[rrlilah n: -E•ui., eat as with r're ess colt/ u ication ices as v el as unli -nsed wirel--s services - d fixed wire = s cervices -uch as mlcrpwav+e back aul- -Radi• ansceivers antennas coaxial orf•:r=c+ is cable re.ular an+ l3aeku .wer su•des and comoatable e•ui -nt e+ardless of technoloabcal oonf• r_ 'ton i u■ii Distri• t-■ A tis stems "r;,S` ands. -•-II networksl. Any structure other than a tower Ilia at the time tyre relevant a licalia is filed 6Eh the C' su oris or ous�es a ui ant destr 2 d ad above ilhaltLas been eiiewed and a..roved rider the a•+ :hie .nin■ + s[ti ■ .rocas or under a. oilier State or local re to• or review •roeess even f ha structure was not built for the sole or crimary.prirpose cf rovtdr that su ri. Th1e 4errn do snot include a�n structure(hal. at the tiniej relevant appication is filed with the City-does not supcori or house equlcrnenl described above, •Collocation:Tfie ttiounlin or'a stallati o of ransml ssio -gull rnenl on an ell.ible support structure for the purpose of transmitting and!or receivinaradio frequency re-semfluricati as—ta y,a1 anctor situ 1c�nals for communication pr.rrrxo�ses,�em�-� +.wed by Blom than one-tel-e am iunlcat+ars or^vice far v♦rler. •Con cealmsnttechnologkr: Transmission.facilities designed to look like sprne feature other Iharx a wireless tower or b-se station•r latch minimizes the visual urn•act of an antenna b use of no reflective steraals a■•r..riate colors and/or'a concealment -nister, fpntimrrk 00.31:Add*of+rrcl.eun' •'Dish:A parabolic or bowl shaped device that receives artdJar transmits signals in a specific directional pattern. •EIA-222: Electronics industries Association Standard 222, "Structural Standards for Steel Antenna Towers and Antennas Support Structures." a Electric transmission:A self-supporting structure in excess of 50 feet in height designed to support high voltage electric lines.This does not include local utility or distribution poles(with or without transformers)designed to provide electric service to individual customers. • '•ible Facilit e= Re+nest• Ara r-+uest for mod f-icalion o!`an exisli . ower or base station that does not aubstantialltr ehanae the physic-al dirnen ions of such ower or base station.involving: CoJlocatian of neransrniss n ui ent 2 q$3-2473-6us.av-3 3048172-000755 Sookarff. r-mobllestarments,112zii CIA 2017-ocos Draft 1117{18 _ -Removal of transmission equipment:or - Replacement of lransrniss`ran eoulpment. • Eligible euppprtstructure: Anu tower or base station as defined In this section, rovided hat it s e lime t - L =v-it a..Ilcab•i `- fled with t e Cit houses of $LlPr+rts an.anten .- rn oro cell o i-II cell de. o u--nt-- F equipment structu A taclli iter cahlnet aauil used to hog and protect electronic or other associated eouiprrlerrt necessary foruracessln�wlrel commu icatinon.s si•:nals. ` ssoclated el i.rnent'ma i a z for exam I = it conditions , backup power supplies and emergency crenerators. • Exist nal A constructed lower or base station is existingif It has been reviewed and aeproved under theaticab[e zcanin or Bilin rocess o under another stele or local regulatory review process, provided that a lower that has not yeses reviewed and reviewed because It was n in a zoned are hen It was trult_ ut was lawful[yr censt acted,is existing for curpases o[cite sr 22i22 SV '..G, F Guyed,tower:Any telecommunications tower supported In whole or in part by cables anchored to the ground. • Height:The distance measured from grade to the highest point of any and ail cornponents of the structure.Including antennas., hazard lighting,and other appurtenances, if any. •Mlcrocrflls: Has the sarrLe meaning as set OM in RCW 80 36275, as now adopted or hereafter amended. •Monopole; A self-supporting lelecommunications tower,which consists of a single vertical pole.fixed into the ground anchor attached to a foundation. • Other srrinporl structure: A s njcture used to suo.art small cell fa_iii ies or enuinrneht slntures-,exclr.din: buirdin s utllrt ole and wafer reservafrs- Exam res of`other support strUct Tres include flagpoles and ball field light standards. • Panel;An antenna whichrecelves andlor transmits signals in a directional pattern. • Prior approval: Certifica oa of aoprcval(s.l from tine Cit'authorizin tlhe initial installation of a_E.:pacific wireless carders small cell facilities on a base staticn or tower- prior appayrovel also incudo the s ibserauent apnrovai(s]from the City authorizing rrrodifrcatio s o the I itial I net 1 lion that have rezulted In the existing state of the small cell fedtity including, but nct limited to,the numtmand location of equipment structures, antennas,antenna support structures,and ancillary eguiolxlent. •Self-support°rng lattice towers A telecommunications tower that consists of an open network of metal braces, usually triangular or square In cross-section. ▪Service:The offering of telecommunications for a fee directly to the public,or to such classes of users as to be effectively available directly to the public, regardless of the facilities used- • Service •rovtder: Has th- a e mean: a- set forth in RCW 35-'9 +10 B as L.l adopted or hereafter .. elided. Service 1 IA ider shall include those irnfrssl-while 3 -2473-685Ev-3 C104e17 kane Valley,T-Ma bile evrnine.nts,1/22/19 CIA 2017-C O5 Graft 1/17/x$ Companies that provide telecommunications services or equipment to enable the de to rrient of erso al wire ess s •Small cell and small call de lo [pent: Have the same meaning as set forth In RCA' 80.36.375,as now adopted or hereafter amended. • Stealth:A telecommunications antenna that Is effectively camouflaged or oancealecl from view. • Substantial change:A modification substantially chanties the physleal dimensions of an etirmible support structure If it,meets en 2 cif the feIIo inq criteria: =For towers other than towers in the increases the height of the tower by more titian iO or ICY the height of one additional arrtertna array with se'arati• from the nearest exIstin• antenna not to exceed twenty feet. whichever is maker-for oth-r titi n ibis suf.■on structures it Increases the height of the structure by mare than 10%or more than ten feet,whichever is greater; -For towers other Viz n towers in the public ri!hts•of-wa it i olves adding au agourtenance to the body of the tower that would protrude from the edge of the ti�ret more#hen tweet fee or snore th he width of he tamer slri4ure at the yel of the appurtenance wvhichever is seater for okl er ello[ble sup ort structures, It involves adding an apprirtenanee to the body e'f the structure that would protrude from the edge of the structure by more than six feet, •Far ancture, It lam es Installation of more than lyes standard number of new equitiment cabinets for the tecltin❑loan irivoltied. but not toexceed four cabinets:or,for lowers In the pub1le,riohts•af=i.vay and ease stations it Involve jnslaILal] n of an n-w - ul•ment -•inetsont .round if there are no pre-existinti ground cabinets associated with the strucktrreo r else Involves installation of around cabinets that are more than 1O artier in heeght or overall volume than tiny:other grail d cabinets associated wathe structure: it entails any excavation or eleplo'n}ent outside the current site. -It 2uld defeat thecoircea`ment elen�enls f ii�e ell ible su et star sire or -It does pot COM*1 with conditions associated ith the sitin• a••ravel of the construction or modli ation of the eligible support facture or base.dation eau:pment, rovided however that This lirnitalion does riot apply to an}t modification that Is raan.c❑rnoIiantonly in a manner that would not exneed the thresholds identified above. •Tetacommunications antenna:An antenna used to provide a telecommr nications service.This excludes lightning rods, private mobile radio systems, amateur radio antennas less than 35 feet in height in residential districts and 50 feet in hei211 in nonresidential districts, ant whip antennas less than four inches(10 cm)in diameter and less than 10 feet in height. *Telr'rn mmunientlons servicer: Has the carne..moon nn HS gel forth in 'C r.) 35,99,010(7}, as now adovled or hereafter amen ed. 4 44{28-74M.84158v,3!1.148172-000 `' $0.olcaneVall?Y,T-hlabilp corn m r,5s,1122 1$ CIA 2017-0005!'Draft 1117110 ■Tower:Anv structure bulli far the sole or orirnary purosse of Stipp Ling any FCC- licensed or authorized antennas and their associated faoiatties, Including structures that are oonstrucled for wir-less. arnmunic.atio:s services Includin,, but not limited io, private,b adcast. and public caret servle well as unli used wireless rti+loes andliixes'Aimless services such as mIcrawave bacrliaul and e 5soctates e_ A .. Corm•ient[LA4Jr `tower' shall not include a r .lacemerrt ullti o e as autlioozed lay_a lease viitie Comment(1..h51:•u«latid fit a frau ice or a Small Cell PerrellA 604f r ^parting-or 'tui:rT Fe t ni 2n feet bei+,ht_.■.r itt..1.v ril.•to_cura r more( alihnS ptenna.5: -v-rccrirr"z''8'"�; c ^^' FFalo 'ham opc roto't r Wo-4-turbine supped 1owcrc. •Transmission emerit that 2citita1es trans[ar ton foi env FCC., licensed or authorized wiroless corrtrlunlcatio service includin. but not lirn`ted to radio transceivers, antennas, oaaxiial or fiber-DOG cable,and regular and back o power suooly, The term includes eo.ui•recent Iassooia es ith wireless communicaticns {+Gurnrttntruisi'■scle'4nd services inoludinro. but not iim e, to. eluate •ra_drtst and`■ublicsafety servioys, as well as unlicensed wireless se s and fixed wireless services such as nilcra'•hrave backhaul- riified (Thrnoutia•a Desi In.Concealment of antennas anti e■ui■merit within a s'nole �Fcrmat e rrghir ht eriabosure. ' [7timment DAM ulcer nevi deflnhlen • [Wilt'? pots: A structure dell ned Arid used p aril for the surxoort of electrical wires,telephone wires,television cable.traffic Si. n is or l�ohtlr3 r streets arl<in areas,or pedestrian paths. •'Whip antenna:-An o n i drrectio►at-dipole curie-which is no more than iw inches lo-di etc-r: •Wireless Having no Wre or wires, operating by means of transmitted eleci_ramagnetic waves. Tower, ham operator;A structure less than 75 feet in height above grade used for two- way corn muntcation for hobby or emergency service purposes by private individuals. —- _.._ ISee"Communication fac:i.tt- use category.' 'l Formatted;FIrnilgnt 1 5 482 6.24 73-f 85avapa4817 2•f10D7 9 5 5pdlcanu.V J I L°y,7-Mo1311e ec mmt ni s 1i11f 711R CIA 2017-0005 draft 1/17/18 DRAFT SVMC 19.60.050 Use?Catcgary Type1 R1 Ft2 R R4lMF9 MF211AUC CMU 60 o tac'C RC Pl3S 11 12 ConImunteatlan Facilities I B Rad o T P P P P P P braadvastiing hIJi4 Repcaterfaci PPPP P P PPP P P P Sma° Lihankfif 5 5 S S S S O § SS O 22 121 SVMC Telmmunicaton Chapter wir ass ant+E3neaa SS S S S S S S C CIS S S S S 22.126 SVMC array I TelecalnmunIcabn e Chapt vtsratam.support G C C C C C S r S C C S S S S S 22.120 SVMC towar Thwer,barn SVMC SSSS S S S S C C S IS! S S S lopelatdi _ _ - 11 19.90.410(A) 4825-2473-585E4.30048172° 91 ;pal<ane -Mob'I cctmmpta,122116 CTA 2017-0005 Draft 3117/1 DRAFT Chapter 22.120 SVPAc 22.120.010 Purpose and intent. These standards were developed to protect the public health, safety, and v1e'fare, and minimize visual impacts on residential areas, while furthering the development of ..vireless communication services. These standards were designed to comply with the Telecommunication Act of 1990.The provisions of ilk. tFe_1ionvhapter 22.120 are not intended to and shall not be interpreted to prohibit or to have the effect of prd hl biting wireless communication services. Chanter 22,1Z0 shall cover all wireless communication services oilier than small cell services,which are regulated Pursuant to chapter22.121 22.120,020 Permits and exemptions. Where a transmission tower or antenna support structure is located in a zoning district which allows such use as a oermltled use activity, administrative review,and a building permit,shall be required, subject to the project's consistency with the development standards set forth in SVMC 22.120.040. In instances where the use is riot allowed as a permitted use activity, a conditional use permit and building permit shall be required in addition to a demonstration of consistency with all required development standards. Exemption; Wireless radio Ltilized for temporary emergency communications in the event of a disaster 1s exempt from the provisions of this section and shall be permitted in all zones. 22.1120.030 Required application 5ubrnittals. All applications for wiretessantenna arrays and wireless communication support towers shall include the following; A.A tetter signed by the applicant stating that all applicable requirements of the FCC, the FAA, and any required avigation easements have been satisfied. B.A scaled site plan clearly Indicating the location,type and height of the proposed tower, antennas, on-site land uses and zoning,adjacent land Cases and zoning, adjacent roadways, proposed means of access,setbacks from property lines,elevation drawings of the proposed tower, the equipment structure,fencing,buffering and the type of stealth technology which W:ll be utilized.The full, detailed site plan shall not be required if the antenna is to be mounted on an existing structure. C.The applicant shall have performed and provided a photographic simulation of the proposed facility from all erected properties and public rights•of-way- 7 X1828.2413-68 v-3 GOQri172.00r3795 Saak3neValley,7-Mobf grnrnents,1f22f18 CIA 2D17-0005 Draft 1/17/18 D,The applicant shall provide copies of any environmental documents required by the State Environmental Policy Act ($EPA). E. The applicant shall have demonstrated effort to co-locate on an existing support tower or other structure. New support towers shall not be permitted within one mile of an existing support tower unless it is demonstrated that no existing support tourer or other structure can accommodate the proposed antenna array-The City reserves the right to retain a qualified consultant:: at the applicants expense, to review the supporting documentation for accuracy. F. Evidence to demonstrate that no existing support tower or other structure can accommodate the proposed antennaarray may consist of the following; 1. No existing support towers or other structures are Located within the geographic areas required to meet the applicant's engineering requirements. 2. Existing supFort towers or other structures are not of sufficient height to meet the applicant's engineering requirements. 3- Existing supFort towers or other structures do not have sufficient structural strength to support the applicant's proposed antenna array and related equipment. 4. The applicant's proposed antenna would cause electromagnetic Interference wit-i the antenna on the existing support towers or other structures,or the antenna on the existing support towers or other structures would cause interference with the applicant's proposed antenna. G.The applicant of a new tower shall provide a signed statement stating the applicant has provided notice to all clher area wireless service providers of its application to encourage the co-location of additional antennas on the structure. I-I. A signed statement from the owner and/or landlord to remove the facility or obtain another permit for the facility within six months of when the facility is no longer operating as part of a wireless communication system authorized and licensed by the FCC. I. Proof that all the neesssry property or easements have been secured to assure for Ile proper construction, continued maintenance, and general safety of the properties adjoining the wireless communication facility. 22.120,044 [resign stande.rds, The support tower, antenna array, and supporting electrical and mechanical equipment shall be installed using stealth technology- Stealth technology applies to all personal wireless service facilities,including,waithout limitation, antennas, towers and equipment structures. For any facility, stealth technology means the use of both existirg and future technology through which a personal wireless service faculty is designed to resemble an object which is already present in The local environment,such as a tree, streetlight,or traffic signal. It also Includes: s 4E25.2473-65 5v_3 DO48172-0010755 akane V2licy'.F-f+.obile corn meals.1122/15 CIA nn17-0045 Draft 1117/15 A. For personal wireless service support towers_ 1. If within existing trees, "stealth technology" means: a, The tower is to be painted a dark color; b. Is made of wood or metal; and c. A greenbelt easement is required to ensure permanent re:ention of the surrounding trees. 2. Stealth technology for towers in a more open setting means that they must have a backdrop (for example, but not limited to, trees, a hillside, or a structure)on at least two sides, be a compatible color with the backdrop, be made of compatible materials with the backdrop, and that architectural or landscape screening be provided for the other two sides, if existing trues are the backdrop, then a greenbelt easement Is required to ensue permanent retention of the surrounding frees. 3, Antennas shEll be integrated into the design of any personal wireless service tower to which they are attached. External projections frum the tower shall be limited to the greatest extent technically feasible. 4. For rooftop antennas or antennas mounted on other structures: a- For omni directional antennas 1.5 feet or less above the roof, stealth technology means use of a color compatible with the roof, structure or background; b. For other antennas, stealth technology means use of compatible colors and architectural screening or olher techniques approved by the City. B. For antennas mounted of one or more building facades, stealth technology means use of color and materials such that the facility has architectural compatibility with the building_ It shall be mounted on a wall of an existing building in a configuration as flush to the wall as technically possible and shall not project above the wall on which it is mounted. C. For equipment structures, stealth technology means locating within a building, or if on top of a building,with architecturally compatible screening.Art undergror nd location, or above ground with a solid fence and landscaping,is also considered stealth technology. D.Advertising or display shall not bo located on any support tower or antenna array; however,the owner of the antenna array shall place an Identification plate Indicating the name of the wireless service provider and a telephone number far emergency contact on the site. E. No artificial lights other tnan those required by FAA or other applicable authority shall be permitted-All security lights shall be down-shielded, and installed to be consistent with Chapter 22,50 SVMC, 9 4x28.247 -EasEv.3 OD45177-OE0795 SGgkaneValle4,T-Maile eon-merts,142/18 CIA 20170005 araFt 1112/18 F.The facility shall be enclosed by a site-obscuring secured fence not less than six feet in height with a locking gate. No barbed wire or razor wire shall be permitted. G. The support tower foundations, equipment shelters, cabinets or other on-the-ground ancillary equipment shall be buried below ground or screened with a Nits obscuring secured fence not less than six feet high_The requirement for a site-obscurirg fence may be waived provided the applicant has secured all on-the-ground ancillary equipment in a locked cabinet designed to be compatible with and blend into the setting, and the means of access for the support tower is for al ed a minimum of 12 feet above the ground. H.All support structure(s)for wireless communication antennas shall have tf air means of access located a mini iii ur-i of eight feet above the ground unless the requirement for 2 fence has been waived. I.The support tower shall meet the minimum primary structure setback requirements for the underlying zone. J. Support towers shall not be permitted inside a public park, public monument or private holding located within a public park or public monument. K. The height of the support tower or antenna array above grade shall not exceed the maximum het hi identified in Table 22.120-1 below.The height of a support tower shall include antenna, base pad,and other appurtenances and shall be measured from 111e finished grade of the parcel. Table 22,120-1 —Tower Height Limitations Zone Antenna Array Support Tower R-'l, Single-Family Residential Estate R-2, Single-Family Residential Suburban R-3, Sln+gle-Farnily Residential Urban 20 feet above thezoning R 4, Single Family height limitation or 16 feet 60 feet ResidentlaUrban above existing structure MFR-4, Multifamily Resi d ent ialedldrm.Dc nsi;y Rceidcntial 141F 2, High-Derr:Ay RC4d2n1.i3l Mixed Use Center(MUG) 20 feet above the zoning bQ feet Corridor Mixed Use (CMU) 'height limitation or 16 feet 10 4E28-247_3-6858v.3 004 l7Z-0CQ7 5 5 ,;1NiumeVallvio,T•Mlablle commeats,it k 16 CrA 2017.0405 prart IAMB Table 22.120-1-Tower Height Limitations Zone Antenna Array Support Tower I City Center(CC) above existing structure I Gar-Jen-Cif-lice(SO) I Formatted Table Imo) Neighborhood Commercial (N C) Corn Regional Cornrnerolal(RC) 20 feet above the zonin 20 feet higher than by maximum height a lowed in the ILight Industrial Mixed Use height limitation or 20 feet zona yr SQ feet whichever Is (Ir u4) above existing structure less' 1 Hcy Industrial(I-2) "An additional 20 feet In height for each additional antenna array co-looted on the support tower, up to a maximum tower height of 100 feet.inoludIng the height of all antennas. 22.120.050 Landscaping. Refer to Chapter 22.70 SVMC for landscaping requirements applicable to the underlying zoning district. 14528.24 -6esau_3 OO4 755 5 l a n�V Ile T-Mnbile coil me i1 2 1E CIA 2013-0005 Draft 1/17/1$ DRAFT Chapter 22-1211 SWIM—Small Cell deployment 22.121.010 Overview, n order to manaa its 1.ht-of- n a thou hiful lanner which balances the need to aced] jmodete ne and evolvin technolo.ies with t .reservation of the natural a d aes a is environ ant of the Cit while =nil Ina with the requirements of slate a d federalJaw. the City -.o■ts cha.ter 22-121 SVMC fa the dello mento -mall cell and rnicrocell techr ologM. _Serwho seek to utilize the public right-off-w far smalll e to ment in ardet to rovide wireless communicallon data lean i sloe or other related senaioes to the citizens of the City shall receive a valid franchise to provide the s.ecific se 'ce seekin. to utilize the sinal -II dello ment. Entities wit-1 franchises who wish to utilize a small cell der {,rent to upgrade o_ r exr and their existing services shell utilize the processes set forth in chapter 22,121 SVMC and implementing small cell hermits to deploy_their technology_and ohtalrti desfdn approval or specific Irtstaliations. . hlothi in eha ter 22.121 S h11C revises or diminishes the rights and obligations or an existing franchise. B. The term 'small cetll der.lovment` shall Include Ihae deptoyrnent of esnail cell facilities, micro cells and small cell networks as those terms are defined by RCN 1:0.35.375 as ow ado ted ohereafter amended. Small cell deolovrnent elements wirlch reoruire SEPA review rna+�trtilfte these processes only in con lunotion with SEPA review. 22.121.016 Administration, The City Manager is chargod with administration of small cell deployment permitting and other `r= s commuhiri« review .recesses established ,rider chewers 22 f) 22-121,and 22.122 SVMC- 22.121,020$ all Cell Dei layprn Small C. I Dodo nierrks i 'i.hts-of-Wa , Small cell dello men s n the .ublic t ile-of-wa - all onl be rade ■ursuant 1 to a valid franchise with the i and 2 En compliance with a1i federal, slate.and local small cell permitting requirements. Small Cell Deployments outside of !Rights-of-Way. Small call deployments outside of the pubic rights-DI-way shall oral Sae 1.de in com+lian -II ;decal state and ■cat small cell perrniltina requirements, 22.121.030 Franchise Application. 12 4828.2+173-6853y3 oO 5172.Ooc7.95 ,okantValle uh;:leccrau-n . a n 1$ ciA 2017.0005 Draft2f17}18 A. Franchise Application. Servi 15 okaneva-'Ic T- tlecninmen a 1fz2/i8 CTA 2D17-DODs mart 1/1.7/1.8 a i+lira+o, ma be a., .arded • r rie or more concurre a..11cati■, s for a sma,Jcel1 r}e?rnl to deploy small Cells. 13. Small cell permit au❑I' atio . A small ell perrnit appliction shall ohteln ti-Le fallo wlna: 1. All small cell Cecilir sites shalt tae s scified. l!p to 30 sites rnav be speel{red in one small cell erniit G licatlon f❑r,p7ocessinR._ The application shall Include sufficient Information about each site an .acllit in o .er for the Cly to determine that It comcslies desi n . , location sta dards set faith I VMC 2.121.060. {Formattada WOW 2. if e a..lication eludes sm- cell dens -nt in the a copy of the franchise application or reference to approved existin€t french se shall be 'included. A+f .va far a ; -1l cell .errnit o install a sralis all be .intirrvenl upon approval of asmall cell fCAguise or theEassession of a valid small cell franchise. _ 3. If more than one ap l cation for as small veil permit rs submitted by en applicant, they shall be oonsid-red In the order received If multi+l= iiications are su rniktad on the name date t e o lino t shall indicate which application shall he considered first. 4. Any element of a deoloym nt whlcly Qualifies ae either an eligible facilities request or a collocation stall be s ecificall desi aneed b the aFP icarii and a be Addressed se amid k v the ity Marler En order to.com91++ with the aa❑licable iro assinc7 require ents established b federal law S ate law- and eh o'er 22122 SAM. 5. Any aiication for 2 srrral l ce 1 Eirnit whi contains an element whish is not exemit from SEPA reVew shall .`r ultaneousl bniit an •rwirorrrrnental checklist pursuant to Chapter 43.21c RCW and chapter 21.20 SVIVIC. f. The a. (cant shall submit a sworn declaration under ■enact of r• .0 sinned ky an RF Engineer with knotia ede of the .ro.cserl ire ect afftrmin■ that tete s - I cell de.10 ment 'II be corn+l ant with all FCC and another a••l.cable re+ulatip s to connection with human exsure to radio frequency emissions for e+rery Frequency at which the small cell faellity and associatedwirelessbacichatil will operate- An exitin franchisee ai•1 in. for a sm-t cell .ermit fir small cell de' o ell.shall .rovide an 1R1 certification for al]ja❑ilities'nclu,.ded In the deplovment. 7- The applicant attain pride pro Frof FCCca her re uta a rcvals fepuIred to pctrvide the service s or utibze tha teclinola le sou ht to be Installed. $, As applicable., the a..1irar a!I .rovidv itian .r•.+ IT.II an Ltili . ider authorizing the appijcant id use ttre utility pr,ayider's utility poles for small cell deployment. 14 482P-2473-6858Y 3 0040.172-1X-0 795 1 Vallr'i'LI-Mobile Com ments,11721U CTA 2617-1JOO5 Draft 1/17/18 C, Completeness; Small Cell Applications. The City Mai-tarter shall review an a.• - ion for comalelen=4s and noti the a.dicant w"thin 30 da s Of submission whether tI- 2pplicatisn is carni tete rovidedowever thata a I can a consent to a .3 a enl eom;,i - -1: review ;-ro• A service ' ov'der nia asubmIt en a..r `on determined ncom•lete wit in 34 days of n tice by the City_ anaecr r or cies°.r-a Failure to rSsu. if an ai*lic- i.. in a Wel annex shall be deemed a withdrawal of that application. No application shall be deemed complete without the fee deposit set by rhe City Mem-,ger. D. The City Manager may approve deny nr conditionally approve all or any Portion of the sites proposed In the small ceermit application. 22.121.050 Small Coll Franchise and Permit Review Process. The f owin. .rovisions elate to revie o a..lications for renchise cr s all cell permit for small cell deployments. A. Review of Far lies- Review late site locations proposed by the applicant shall be governed by the provisions of USC 253 and d7 U.S.C. 332 ad e icab1 se jaw- Applicants for franchlsbs and the small cell permits which lmplerrrenf the franchise shall be treated in p cornretitively neutral and non-dlsciiminatory manor with other service providers utilizing supporting infrastructure Wall is functionatl e r lvalent that service providers whose facilities are similarly situated In terms of structure, placement or cunwlalive Impacts. Franchise and small cell permit application review under chapter 22,121.SVM= shall neither pro' ibtt nor have the effect of rohibitin the abifit of an a..licaratto.,rn.ridetelecommunications services. 8. Desin Review end Coricealrnent- Small cell facilities shall conform to desi.n ocation and conceal men standards and be rub'ect to des+,a review as set fort I . trurma¢ed:Hhdiyht SV1I1C 22,1;1.050- C. Franchisepproval, Franchises shall tae a roved in the form of a Cik ordirrani e and franchises ua cal be as. +ved b the CI Council +• rsuant to its sten; ordinance approval process. provided however, that the City shall meet ary applicable federal or state time proceSsinq requirements in reviewing and approving or denying a franchise a_polication, D. 011ier auditions of approval Approval of a frantlse, small is 1t perrnit and/or other approval referenced in chapter 22.121 SVM,C_are cionditioned. on the following requirements: 1. Satisfy all applicable hulk requirements Including but not.limited to height, noise lilt and a other a+*iccebl= oil . re•uire el E. Provide written n ■of of the approval of this owner of arty Ertllity pole for the 15 1 482 8-7473-5,858v. 404E 17 z-4QU715 pakar'e valLev.1-Mlablre caanmg,ts,if 22/18 CTIA 3017-0OOS Craft 1/17fia i - allatior► of ills - iiities on sic sift .ole- • s oval of a franchise does not authorize attachment 10 City-owned utility ooles_or other structures. fess spscjfl l x ravicted for a franehlse ob sin a lease from the City to utilize the City's around 512 for the installation of any new pole, a replacement utility elle over sO feet lot to Idea a an new tround eased strJctu..e base station o. her . ...- Colarm.ntlIAel.clarify this UCCGf.r.tgtwr attendant eaul rent on Ci ht-el-way or City aro pit yyl;lr pale s awned end Co/TA by6 rsan#rty e ., Y+ eLKukfl swh Of Av1e6F00a 6a ravemtd ray Iii-7Rylt'a's aged nAe;MAN attsrhment t• 4, Corns With as•ficable Cil a•*royal .rooesses or the oo-lo_- ion of suds a trait,OEris eclivp pick replacement wit M aft required For structwal Ii.rit and/ores facilities, or the installation of any new or replacement replacernelik5rpales in the richt-of-way; dlrerJtedIrfant aR#ypro5dder- artd 5. Comply With all City construction standards aricf state and federal codes when operating In the rictht-ofmy and obtain a red permit t enter the right [t_wa IL121"O O Design and Concealment Standards_ Small cell facilities shall be nslalled using stealth or opncealment technologk. Stealth or co alment technolor a ".lies to al sm-11 cell fatalities 'ncludin., wilho i _Kation Inas (owe s 8l arra e. is r en enclosures. For -n small cel facitip stealth or concealment technologx means the use of both existing and future # olinologi through which the small cell fac11K Is dests red to resemble or blend Ink an oh`ect which is already present In the local=en r1ronment, such as a tree streetliGht or traffic signal. Et also Inclydes: — A. For those portions sf small -11 facilities attached to or dart of li hl +owe sl.rn- or other poles_ 1- Fcl cies integrated within he sole unless technical' Infeasible- New poles shall be sub ect to ty orIrtdustr r standards; 2, For exislino *des 'rtes rated Into the exis ino desk.,n of 1. _ •le to which -t- attached, with external erolect+ons limited In site and scope to the oreaiesl extent technically feasible, Including but not limited to being as flush as passipte to thele not .ro'eclina or- than fifteen feet ve'ticell above the +■le and having architectural I:osnpatlbklity with the P. 3- External rp'ec9ions shall be a-inted a color to e--}able and match pe ..le so that the appear to he part of the pole 4, hall conform to an structural standar■s so as not to degrade the stria r. engineering of th pole to which it is attached: a. Shall riot interfere with the normal use for which the pole is intended, including hitt n l limited to bto+eacing any liahl from iglik poles, interfering vuill7 power tines on - fComineetlur0ltsstb1illute-desired tobe uri e I andobsen onion ofthea able rslicsign-facen;inlon and +wa+Fad(pm e rnlingfzttui tuts Iled �rr C- ten nae for -mall cell facilities =hall be located Inside of an antenna enclosure no more than three cubic feet In volume,or in the case of an antenna that has exposed elements, the ent4tnr1t3 and all of its expp eti elements Gould fit within an lmagirlary enclosure of en more than three cubic#eel. nlfied carinpuflage designs are .ermitted a .vlded ,4-t the overall di e skins of such d. i+n- shall het e ed six is 482E-7173-5 SBY,3 C048.1724 203795 k 5pelPa ne+Ja llelr.1-uloblle rorrirfignt$.U2ZI .A CIA 2417.0O015 Draft 1.117118 cubic feet .r volume •nteranee s all be Iona ed et least 20 feet above the base .., - foltririgritIliaoilkuProtai elevation ofthe aroun unless tecfiinicailw infeasihle. ,Prlmapr eoulornenl enclosures shall be Rojlarger than seventeen oubin feet in volume. The falldwM assoclat a ul anent a tie l sated outside the p1]m N ehulorneni enclosure and If so located, are not included in the catnula tan of equipment volume = ectrlc ii _r roncea ent. tele +r m dem-rcalion boa, ground-based enclosures, battery back-up power systems. wounding_a iulprnentb power transfer switchand cut-off svirkOtt_ Primaryauioment enclosures shall be buried below_ rr ar locked and i t-.■rated into a sur oundi a s unless echntcWall nfeesiblc Io:.tee _, - - froirmatedilliamglit t llrs3u.T,--e4r,oR-;: This shall Include incorporating the facilities into The base of the pole, inteQraiirtn into ealstino surroundirra i tures such as cfarbage' containers or, olllerfower boxes. emits _Ise of matei Is and colors that blend Into the 3urraundinq setting. Ground r}unted facilities sh l of be located in an_Irr}proved street or sid• ,elk. Gro Ai a-mounte+ a tithes alai tot located r a stortrlwater faciti-ryjmolucfinq storrriw ter swales. nifte Mmoufare dash ns are Permitted pursuant to 22.121.060 fanrt,atted:tllyaW (A1{61^ - ramarnilnt[1u111a uwn(e»i C. For small cell facilities mcupted on one or mere b�uildin fa des stealth or conceai ent teatlns oau means use of odor, arid materials such tli t he facility. las architectural core tihili w1th the building. It shall be mooned on a wall n' en existing buildino in a configuration as flusl3 to the wall as teeliiucall possible and shall not I ro ect more than three feet above the wall on which s mountednlfied camouilarie —1designs are oennitted�urscant to22_121,Q660 A 6 imoment{1-412 � rnsert D.Advertising or display s'-iall not J e located oh anv small cell facility: however, the owner 01 the small cell facilit chat place an identification date Ind gin• the na I: of the wiielessservice plc der and a telephone number for erneroency contact on the site E. Ro arlificia.l iiuhts other than those required by FAA or other applic ble null 4rity shall b permitted An secuii§ lights shall be down-shielded. F.Smail cell facilities that are not wit in the right-of-wa shall meet the minimum m primary stnicture setback reauiremenfs for the under in zone. . moll ^all foe hal. r=MR a tZ,Aj..,s. a.111 4., :;.i.: - - . — Lal. '_ _ _ t• ' hind E - t t.tr_ - -- - -- - . [oma„wnt[L143.3),IEerammwiu■hminatin2 li ntirldlen Rail calk Fwd."6nproved colmiti and termare In areas of kith P•txrcak me;rho-i H. Location. Small call facilities shall not be located within l201 feet of any other s'rriall snap, ilk•rnanurnertsa vill peqUire thiSteralMbire cell fa:•i unless .; as alicarlt •=monstrates t -t no oil r location can acoorniinas+a a I1 mane wriretec wee.'mem or is sufficient to meet the eless sery co needs_ In the event a small cell a,-II is required to be located within 250 f--t of another exi5tin■ small cell fault' the a• ticceni shall make a good faith effort to colloca a ire ow Ii on lie sante u+,Ie or structure as tate erristinl3 small fa ilii in order t4 minimize iiia acts from new srrlell Cil: iacilthes 17 4825-2473.6854u'3 044$17 2-04079 5 1 SpokatiieVa`I€ .T-Moblie corrllneits,1/22/18 CTA 2017-9005 Draft 1./17/is The City may require appiC.anla tQ provide evidence [rf ffnris for colcoltion. An azelic ant rr1r3' demonstrate piped faith efforts to avid ee e /rum the ajthervvireless presyj erfs�iftat the are unwiiliiiaa it as fechn.caily Infeasible Io collocate. et from pole or structure owners that they will trot allow collocation or that.It is technically infeasible to allow callocatl,err. 22.121.07 Small Cull Per It€end Minor Deviations, k The City Mann ler shall review applications for small cell Permits far small cell de*lo jre is a .raved b e fra tit se or small ll ermit. e Cil Male.er ma auth•r' = minor d-viattons In the -m-1 tell .-rm` owl the dimensional Tensional design and concealrrrent lechnct� es referene ltn the exjs to the,nchise or design standards w ere such demotion is necessa to allow l ea. . bean t+ •rcwide coverage and where Stith deviation does not maeial differ from the Ci 's desinn and conceal ent ata ard-or moves es uivalenl or utter rrrte•r- i•,1.- - _ - '{Comment 11.410 rnsan tot Devialions in the dimensions or vplurne of srrrall cell facililFe rv�ich cies n❑t -xceed the cumulative total provided by the definition of a small cell or rniorocefl facility RCW 80.35 275 shall be .■ sidered a mlr'r devlaticirr •rovtded however that they do not defeat the concealment features set • Cit 's se oral. n.Mica, dello and concealment standards. C. Small cell perrnli s tb Install facilites Including apuoval of minor deviations shall be processed within&0 days of receipt of a camptete application and final approval of a franchise ichever occurs last. 22.121.084 SlgnifjcantDevlatione, Any request for significarr. dev6d olrs from the approved small cell facilities de5klu desi+na a In thef chlse. small c=- aermit of Cit 's des]:n standards shat{be reouire a conditional use *emit'and shall be •_■risidered and-r the trovisio sof cha. or 22,120 SVMC and ursuant.ito the timeline stab{ished n SVMC 22,122.030 and SVMC 22.122,040. A si+nificant•ceviation I of a substantia c an.e. See •■-ndix A of the VMC, 22,121.090 Compliance w`l State Processing Limitations. Review of francalvse -nd small cell •ermits shall corn l With the ar❑visions of FCVW 35-99.030. Applications shall be reviewed, completeness determined and the timeers • ailed es + * i,_,• in cha.ter 22. SVMC. 18 14525-7473.61#58, D0413172._107•5 I S.e '.n-VaIle T- +p'le ammertts _' 1l CTA 2017.0005 Draft 1/17f1 DRAFT Chapter RAFT Chapter 22,122 SVMC—Wireless Communications and Small Cell FacilLy Review Periods. 22.122,010 Purpose, Cypress and the Federal Coamun[cations Commission have.pursuant to tie authority Arent d by 47 U C-253[03 and 7 l -C- 332(aU guired local governments to a crn wirele;ta cCirrrnuricaticinfacility applications within a reasonable period of time and have established time Lim' s for local rev]-w. The Wash'I4ton Stale Le.Isla ure has also adopted_similar firnitalions under the provisions of ctaagjr 35.99 RCN, Acoordinoly,the Ci ado is the folk `rt. time Iirni s for review of a..lications ,far eligib[e facililv re+uests small call .-rrnl s and her a royals for service nroviders of telecommunication services 22.122.0201 Eligible Facia es Request. A. Application Review. 1. Application. the City Manager shall prepare and make publicly available pn application form which shall be limited to the information p cessarw fear the City to considerwhe her an a•4licatlo Is an eli.lbie facilities re.uesi. he a..11calljorT ea not re.ulre the a..11canl to cemo strafe a need or business case far the prappsed modiflcahon, Type of Review. Upon receipt of an epritication for an entitle facilis re u- the Ci -na•._r shall r= iew such ar ic- ion to d 'rmirie whether tare licali n qualifies as an ell ible fadlities ce€tuest, 3. Tirneframe for Review- Within 60 days of the date an which an applicant submits a complete ellolbtefacilities request application. the City Marlaoer shall approve. _application unless it determines that the application is not covered by this SVMC 22.122:020. 4- Tolling of the Timeframe for Review. The 60-day review period b-ecins to run when the corn•ete a.,licatiari Is filed and ma be tolled and b mut -1 a.reernenl by the City Manaser Vinci the applicant or in cases where the City Manage- determines that the aupticatiqj ILincc-rnplete. Trip timeframe fcar review of an Elieiale Facilities feouest Is not toff dib a iruratorivaon the review of applications, a. To toll the i efrante for inaar •leteness the Cit Manaaer.shat: •rovide written notice to the asolican ;` hin 30 da s • -cei.l of th- a••1ication •ecifi -ll detineati , all missin• d.,, ents or inform- 'on r-:Nulred[n t e application. 19 I a 7 73-6essw,3 72-U0Q755 I Golcarl+'0IIey,T•MobPe tornmertls,tna CTA 2e17-0005 Draft J/17/18 b The t- re _arae for review be ins rennin• at aIn whe the applicant makes a it i.liant so'I-i a :1 submissio In rest. n-e io the Cit Rana er's no'�: of ineomrl mess. c. I lowlnn e BLit = rental submis`i❑n the C• Mana+er ss - I toll the applicant within 10 da a if the - ■■terrrenlal -ubmission did not .rovi+z e I formation 'dentified i be ori.irsal ro-iee dellnea in. rrtissin' Information, I e limefrarFelled in the. case of second or subsequent notices pursuant to the dures Ade tified in areh 4 of this uectIon. Semi or subsequent notice of ioai1,Ietene_: ms not 6•- i mhssiri• documents • Inforrrtatlo ha was no1 delineated in the original notice of Incompleteness. B. Deteimio on that ApPlication is not an Eli Ne Facilities Eta east. 1E the Ci Manager determines that the aooli nt's request does not gca1114 as an ellgihle facilities eouesl the 'ate periods e -blished b t z. .a.Iioable stat: or federal law and chapter 22..1.22 SVMVIC begin to run from the Issuance the Cit a er's decisip that the a ••cation is not an eliplbEe facilities realest To the extent additional information is necessary, the City btana er may request such information from the applfr nt to evaluate the applicationwider other arovisians of this chapter 22122 SVEIItiC and appiicallte taw- C, Failure to Act_ In the event the Cit M,namer fails to a•'rove or deny reouesl for an eli•lble facilities r=.uest within the lirnefra e for review accountln• for an tollrn th- -.•uest shat) be deemed •ranted. The el:-red grant doe of became effective unlit he ao.licai i■ 'fres the Ci aria Per in ai i • a er the r=.'aw.-riod gas expired (accounting for any lolling) that the application hasp been deemedraa rated. �7, Remedies, E3oth the applicant and the City may bring claims related to Section 6448 a of the S r ec i, m Ad to an court of coo t.= ertt urlsdiction. 22,122.O31 Collocation. Eligible coll❑ca ions shall he processed within 90 days of receipt of a corr�ptete aorslicatian The tv Manager shall notif'ibe applicant wi hln 30 days of recel t. of an araplicaflan whether fl is crrnplete or if additional Infor ❑n is re uir e.. The to collocation shall not apply :y the initial placement of a small calf fa:ciiity on a trtillty pole or on an other base station or tower that -- not construes =d for the sore or . 'ma ur.ose of an FCC licensed a Jenna and their associated facilities. .122,E 4O I'lewWireless Communication Facilities: wireless comrnunicati�+ris facilities alk beprocessed within 160 days of receipt of a corn lets application, The City Manager shall nati thea licant within 34 da s of repel u ■f an al•k an whether ills orn.lele or Ii additional information,is requrreri 20. 1 4ala--q -68581:1795 15 ka CI 2017-DUDS Draft 1'17/18 DRAFT Chapter 17.80 17.80.030 Assignment of development application classification. A. Assignment by Table. Land use and development applications shall be classified pursuant to Table 17,80-1 below: Table 17.80-1 —Permit Type and Land Use Application SYMC Cross- Type Land Use and Development Application Reference Accessory dwelling units 19.40 Administrative determinations by city manager or designee Multiple or building official Administrative exception 19.140 Administrative interpretation 11.50.010 Boundary line adjustments and eliminations _ 20.80 Building permits rot subject to SEPA 21,20.040 Floedplaln development 21.30 Grading permits 24.54 Type I Home business permit 19.65,180 Shoreline letter of exemption 21.50 Record of survey to establish lots within a binding site plan 20,80.040 Right-of-way permits 22.130.100 Site plan review 19.130 l Small cell permit 22,121;22.122 Temporary use permit I9.'i6 Time extensions for preliminary subdivision, short 20.30,000 subdivision,or binding site plan Alterations—preliminary and final subdivisions, short 20.50 subdivisions,binding site plans Type II Binding site plan—preliminary and final 21150 Binding site plan--change of conditions 20.50 SEPA threshold determination1,20.0$(? Shoreline conditional use permit21,50 21. 14818.2473_6 58,03 0045112:00705 15ookarso Valley,T-Mrsblle cor•''ir1erNts 2 7/15 CTA 2017-0005 Draft 1/17/IR Shoreline nonconforming use or structure review 21.50 Shoreline substantial development permit 21.50 Shoreline variance 21-50 Short subdivision--preliminary and final 20.30, 20A0 Preliminary short subdivision, bindine silo plan—change of 20.30 conditions Wireless communication facilities 22.120 Conditional use permits 19.1150 Planned residential develepmen`:s 10.50 Plat vacation 20,70.020 Type III Preliminary subdivision--change of conditions 20.50 Subdivisions—preliminary 20-30 Variance 19-170 Zoning map amendments(site-specific rezones) _ 19,30.030 Annual Comprehensive Plan amendments(text andIor map) 17.80,1140 Type 1V Area-wide zoning map amendments 17,a0-140 Development Code text amendments 17.80.150 B. Assignment by City Manager or Designee,Land use and development applications not defined in Table 17.80.1 shall be assigned a type based on the most closely related application type by the city manager OT designee,unless exempt under SV +C 17.80.040.When more than one procedure may be appropriate,the process providing the greatest opportunity for public notice shall be followed. C. Shoreline letters of exerrptlon, shoreline substantial development permits, shoreline conditional use permits, shoreline variances, and shoreline nonconforming use or structure review shall be processed pursuant to the procedures set forth in Chapter 17,80 SVMC, subject to any additional or modified procedures provided in Chapter 21.50 SVf,11C, Shoreline Regulations, including submittals, completeness review, notices, hearings, and decisions. p Small cell pprni:ts and vAreless cammuriicatiou achilles shall,be processed pursuant a .rocedures set forth in cha!'er 17-80 SVM exce it as a •lherwlse be required pursuant to federal and stale law,includinqbut not limited to 4711$,C- k 1455(a) .Sectlon(340(al of the Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation.Act of 20'2) and clha■ger 35-99 RC Cho Pler 22.12 VMC s•ecifigs applicable time periods for revi a . •r. esslni ' - '.ible foci(ties = ests call6 ions small cell rrnits.and new s commu i tion facilities, DE. Except as provided In Table 17-B0-1,change of conditions for permits shall be processed the same as the original permit type. 22 I 4225-2473-68”v.3 3 0049131-UrJU l iJ CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: March 6, 2018 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: [' consent ❑ old business [' new business [' public hearing ❑ information ® admin. report [' pending legislation [' executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: 2017 Accomplishments Report GOVERNING LEGISLATION: PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: BACKGROUND: Staff will present the 2017 Accomplishments Report. The report includes accomplishments in support of Council's 2017 Budget Goals as well as general accomplishments of each City Department. OPTIONS: RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: STAFF CONTACT: Mark Calhoun, City Manager and Department Directors ATTACHMENTS: PowerPoint Presentation Spokane 201 7 ACCOMPLISHMENTS •OValley 2017 COUNCIL GOALS I . Continue to work with state and federal legislators toward financial assistance for both the Barker and Pines Road Grade Separation Projects. 2. Develop a strategic plan for financing and completion of all grade separation projects. 3. Continue and expand, where possible, economic development efforts. Complete the development of implementation strategies for the retail and tourism studies that were completed in 2016. 4. Pursue a sustainability plan in connection with the City's Street Preservation program, to include sustained funding in the City's Street Fund #10I and Pavement Preservation Fund #311 to address concerns beyond the year 2021 . 5. Evaluate and discuss increasing cost to public safety, including law enforcement. Continue the ongoing process to develop long term solutions to controlling costs while better serving the community. 6. Pursue financing for Browns Park, Balfour Park and ApplewayTrail amenities. I . Continue to work with state and federal legislators toward financial assistance for both the Barker and Pines Road Grade Separation Projects. 2. Develop a strategic plan for financing and completion of all grade separation projects. 2017 COUNCIL GOALS Part of 2017 Legislative Agenda TIGER 9 grant application (November 2017) INFRA grant application (October 2017) Working towards completing the design for both the Barker/Trent and Pines/Trent Grade Separation Projects. 2017 COUNCIL GOALS Barker/ Trent Grade Separation Estimated Cost $ 19,000,000 Fund #3 12 $ 1 ,421 ,000 .,..,._.,,..,:t,'".". ,,,,, •-lt;x7f-.., 7.2 ; r �fCa)RJrl]c�� arc a�a�« . BEET $2,209,000 ', ,:,,, <n ,'`` . } '- , •4,, ;t- rye:;'°`' : -`"K 11 Federal earmark $721 ,000 �"- t , "'" 2017 Washin ton $ 1 ,500,000 .#= ..• State Legislature .� -�- ,oi N H FP $6,000,000 1 , FMSIB $3,800,000 Total $ 15,651 ,000 Still needed $3,349,000 2017 COUNCIL GOALS Pines/ Trent Grade Separation Estimated Cost $21 ,000,000 2016 General Fund property acquisition $500,000 2017 General Fund $ 1 ,200,000 2018 Budget earmark $721 ,321 Total $2,421 ,321 Still needed $ 18,578, 679 2017 COUNCIL GOALS 6 3. Continue and expand,where possible, economic development efforts. Complete the development of implementation strategies for the retail and tourism studies that were completed in 2016. it � S P O K A N E T FIND PROPERTIES 4 N WHERE TRY bITION YA L L E Y 10110E.SpraB eA e., +1.10Y)/2 OUJ r,,economi<develooment(asookanevallevarR • `/ eets t6rtiox A I Spokane Vail,WA 99906 Iem Mnie,MlYeammunrty pdeetl la BUSINESS CLIMATE INDUSTRIES PROPERTIES * BUSINESS RESOURCES LIVING HERE ABOUT DS ow1l,oMm,nmittoam pros i pi �!Y e,lry am yglbrrhraaa,w ale cll,xena. mane et "' Leo. w.spekanevalleyEuag - : ;fp ' +—•_ T / :1 t. Oli WHERE TRADITION MEE S MI ,T 1_6 N a� .. Hy_ 0.111, ir ,- - - `r. - - _ SPOKANE VALLEY • WELCOME TO SPOKANE VALLEY,WASHINGTON . , - ' Spokane Val ley is a city oftrad it ion,fami ly values and a unique quality of life that makes it easy to call home.With low taxes.robust transportation,streamlined WHERE TRADITION ` permitting,and an attractive suite of incentive programs for businesses,Spoken a Va Iley is a city of ambition that makes it easy for businesses to expand or relocate. r Spokane Valley is a thriving,family-friendly 2017 ( ()U N C I L GOALS community poised for growth and committed to - '" -yt,.. -- .ir .. prosperity far both business and its citizens. Learn more at www.SpokaneValleyED.org ' 67, SPOKANE 44- ' .i V E Y Wir s 4. Pursue a sustainability plan in connection with the City's Street Preservation program, to include sustained funding in the City's Street Fund #101 and Pavement Preservation Fund #311 to address concerns beyond the year 2021 . Discussed with Council at February 14th Workshop Discussed throughout the 2018 budget development process 2017 COUNCIL GOALS 5. Evaluate and discuss increasing cost to public safety, including law enforcement. Continue the ongoing process to develop long term solutions to controlling costs while better serving the community. Approved a 5-year extension to the Law Enforcement Service agreement with Spokane County Updated cost methodology for Public Defender Interlocal Agreement Completed extension of Precinct Lease Agreement OLIO 44s. iF . � � tiI II • 2017 COUNCIL GOALS 6. Pursue financing for Browns Park, Balfour Park and ApplewayTrail amenities. Included $200,000 in 2018 budget for Browns Park path and lighting. Sought from 2017 Legislature $540,000 for Appleway Trail amenities on the University to Pines section. , Set aside $721 ,000 of General Fund surplus reserve balance for Balfour Park ,., , ? �' EBro.! � �" '3. Pines to Evereen , f ,. 2. thliver'stty to Pines I.Corbin to City Limit ✓ Completed 2014 Completed 200B ' .,� Completed 2015 - • t t z i I ' Evergreen to Sullivan 5,1,tUniversity to City Hall Design 2018 4. Sullivan t4 Corbin •• Design 2018 Construction 2020 Construction 2018 N Construction 2079 . yjilli",„ E ....,s.. �,�,�.,s.n k. 5 rl 2017 COUNCIL GOALS- # Spokane ADMINISTRATION Valley®COUNCIL CITY CLERK CITY MANAGER CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION CITY COUNCIL - REGIONAL REPRESENTATION PARTICIPATION I . Emergency Communications Board 911 2. Greater Spokane Incorporated Board of Trustees (GSI) 3. Greater Spokane Valley Chamber of Commerce Board 4. Growth Management Steering Committee of Elected Officials (GMA) 5. Hotel/Motel Advisory Committee (TPA) 6. Mayor's Association of Northeast Washington 7. Spokane County Housing & Community DevelopmentAdvisory Committee (HCDAC) 8. Spokane Regional Clean Air Board 9. Spokane Regional Health District Board 0. Spokane Regional Transportation Council (SRTC) 1 . Spokane Transit Authority (STA) 2.Visit Spokane Board of Directors I3.Wastewater Policy Advisory Board COMMITTEES - MEETINGS - RESO - ORDINANCES Total Meetings 47 k Regular Council Meetings 20 �� . WII ruwnnuAMKVALI EV VnI Study Sessions 22 ,. R. pGa..NORDINN o.ITNOF..o,,IV I YLIISMOPODANAtNNk(O,.. AVWANTIIMERPAT SlA 3TVNnye,.Fr roJmu MA11.MN Ilt UMW THEM TOx ninny n A Special Meetings 5 ..,re �� x..�... �.ry.w�, „�,�..a�. .� �, ��,� x.m ai Yk 20 — Resolutions passed 14 — Ordinances passed Spokane Valley City Council Committees A; con Finance CommitteeA�s� 2. Governance Manual Committee 3. Lodging Tax Advisory Committee (LTAC) 13 CITY CLERK Public Records Requests - 288 Recorded Documents — 66 Records Management Legal Notices Published — 188 Archived storage boxes — 240 Liquor License Applications — 37 Archived file storage boxes destroyed — 71 Marijuana License Applications — 6 Archived boxes sent to State Archives — 65 Liquor Special Occasion License Applications — 33 Files/Documents destroyed — 7,924 Address files scanned and destroyed — 4, 142 Contracts processed - 287 CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION Negotiated updated cost methodology for Public Defender Interlocal Agreement to better reflect services received and more accurately allocate costs to all jurisdictions Negotiated revised terms to the precinct lease and maintenance agreement with Spokane County including I 0 year term length extension Secured State Office of Public Defense Grant for $ 17,500 to help offset the costs of additional attorneys hired to meet caseload standards Successfully negotiated a new law enforcement contract that segregated City costs, simplified the cost methodology, enhanced control over services, and strengthened identity as well as increased performance measures and reporting requirements - CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION Completed re-worked law enforcement cost methodology with the County Budget Office Completed competitive process and negotiation for new solid waste collection services contracts providing $ I .5 million in savings Completed analysis of Regional Animal Control Model leading to a full review of Animal Control Services by the Advisory Board Presented and finalized agreement for Commute Trip Reduction HUMAN RESOURCES Spokane jvdlley " HUMAN RESOURCES Conducted 75 interviews, filling 30 positions Facilitated the City Hall move-in process transitioning staff to the new building Supported City management and employees through the restructure and consolidation of Public Works and Community & Economic Development Departments Attained the WellCity Award for the 7th consecutive year reducing City health care costs by 2% Revised compensation and sick leave procedures in response to Initiative 1433 we I City 18 Processed 193 separate payroll actions Supported the City Council in moving to alternative health plans Facilitated the annual employee appreciation events Successfully passed the 20I 7WCIA audit concerning fleet management Facilitated a workplace safety review of City Hall by Spokane Valley Police 401S \%.ftia OFFICE OFTHE CITYATTORNEYVa11ey(SPOn�l " OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY Mission —To assist in implementing Council policy by providing clear legal direction and meaningful assistance to Council, and to staff who implement City programs. Maintain a positive and creative workplace. Numerous presentations and drafts of sidewalk snow removal options, culminating 20-month process with adoption of new Code requirements; with assistance from Spokane Valley's Executive Assistant Elisha Heath, implemented new sidewalk snow removal requirements Significant participation in negotiating and drafting revisions to the interlocal agreement with Spokane County Library District for new library site Significant participation in negotiating and drafting revisions to the interlocal agreement for law enforcement services Significant participation in overseeing construction-related issues with new City Hall, including issues with closing out the construction contract OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY - CONTINUED Assisted Community & Public Works regarding large proposed development on southern part of the City Provided advice and guidance to Council and City Manager regarding proposals relating to parental rights Significant participation on developing new proposed regulations and franchise agreements for small cell telecommunication facilities Assisted Community & Public Works in resolving numerous contract and compliance issues relating to the Sullivan Bridge West project Provided support on many public record requests and related issues Significant participation in assisting the City Manager and Council in identifying and responding to broad spectrum of legislative agenda issues Advised and assisted with issues related to 20 18 lodging tax revenue distributions OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY - CONTINUED Primary support to all departments on contract issues Provided training to staff, Council, and other elected officials on various issues, including contracts, open public records, open public meetings, and sidewalk snow removal Provided general advice and guidance to senior management on a broad range of municipal and management issues Significant participation in completion of solid waste collection services RFP resulting in three long- term contracts and substantial savings over existing solid waste rates Assisted with implementation of Comprehensive Plan Update and related development regulations Assisted and advised numerous development and land use issues related to marijuana uses, including conducting and winning an appeal regarding a specific property Developed amendments to purchasing and procurement regulations Contracts Reviewed - 342 Work Orders Processed - 280 Number of Open Litigation Matters - 63 Number of Closed Litigation Matters - 37 Public Record Requests Processed - 24 Average Number of Days for Completion of Tasks - 19 24 FINANCE & Spokane INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY Va11ey ' FINANCE 2018 Annual Budget Completed the 2016 annual financial report and related audit process conducted by the State Auditor's Office. �, J Result was a "clean" opinion with few audit recommendations. jot. - - icer' r - fvl�Y r^Yi r Worked with the City Manager's office and all other departments to complete the 2018 Budget development process. - 10210 E.Sprague Ave. Spokane p Spokane 11a99206Val ley 00 w 509.720.50 4000 ookane~.11ermre 6 FINANCE _sa • Worked with other departments to implement the reorganization of the • Community & Economic Development and Public Works departments into the new "9g 337 Community & Public Works Department. -49.96„,/ '4ggd6&6 ,@9988 3p67 68 3°. Included developing a new account structure to accommodate the 677, reorganization. • Worked with the City Manager and Community & Public Works to evaluate funding needs for the Street O&M and Pavement Preservation Funds and the effect on Real Estate Excise Taxes. This is an ongoing evaluation. • Moody's Investors Service upgraded Spokane Valley's bond rating from Aa3 to Aa2 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY Facilitated the move of the City's network to the new City Hall with minimal disruption to operations. Worked with the contractor to design and install new audio/visual equipment in Council Chambers. 0th Technology Refresh 155 desktop computers 35 tablets INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY Worked with the Parks & Recreation Department to upgrade the audio/visual equipment in the Great Room at CenterPlace. Closed 849 Helpdesk calls. Maintained network availability of 99.9% during normal business hours in 2017. COMMUNITY & PUBLIC WORKS Spokane ENGINEERING Valle CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM TRAFFIC Y x STORMWATER SOLID WASTE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM TRANSPORTATION PLANNING • Coordinated with SRTC's Technical Transportation Committee (TTC) and State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) STREET PRESERVATION PROGRAM Continued work on Implementing Street Preservation Program Utilized grant funds and City funds to maximize preservation program CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DESIGN PROJECTS: • Mission Avenue Street Preservation — Pines to McDonald --- •-- . , w • Mission Avenue Street Preservation - McDonald to Evergreen " _ __ `` ' it Mission Avenue Reconstruction Project (Flora to Barker) imi -` -- Pines (SR-27)/Grace Intersection Safety Project ._ Indiana Avenue Preservation — Mirabeau Parkway g to Evergreen Euclid Avenue Preservation — Flora to Barker Appleway Trail — Sullivan to Corbin , ,201fl4; Saltese Preservation ' -t Ark 9th Avenue Sidewalk — Raymond to University ¢ ,A ; R6 ' -- it / t 4 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM . k.„i tTiipw DESIGN PROJECTS (CONTINUED): _ I,- _._. i • Sullivan Euclid PCC Intersection Project rk , ; ITS Infill Project r _ Bowdish Road & 12th Avenue Sidewalk Project i', , University Avenue - 16th to 24th 1 _ University Avenue - 24th to Dishman Mica _ Barker Road Grade Separation Project - Phase Pines Road Grade Separation Project - Phase Citywide Signal Backplates Citywide Reflective Signal Backplates Sprague Avenue Preservation — Sullivan to Corbin 33 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CONSTRUCTED PROJECTS: • Mission Avenue Street Preservation-Pines to McDonald $495K • Indiana Avenue Preservation-Mirabeau Parkway to Evergreen $520K Sullivan Road West Bridge Replacement $ 15.8M Saltese Preservation $965K • 9th Avenue Sidewalk $200K IF • Sullivan Euclid PCC Intersection Project $ I .75M '' • Bowdish Road & 12t"Avenue Sidewalk Project $575K i \' ONGOING PROJECTS: -�_._ l a • Euclid Avenue Preservation — Flora to Barker - 1.40 • Appleway Trail — Pines to Evergreen d , Citywide Signal Backplates Citywide Reflective Signal Backplates - - .. STO R MWAT E R . . . DRAINAGE SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS: _` *} y, • Installation of 23 new catch basins $58K `- Replaced 12 drywells $96K Decommissioned 8 drywells/pipe sumps $8K = Improved drainage at 92 locations $325K �' INSPECTIONS: --„ .. .._ , _, '- ▪ Investigated 17 reported spills 1111 Over 1, 100 drywell debris inspections ' :,k .. ,' � " � � � _sem, • Over 900 swale condition assessments ,_y .41„ OPERATIONS: , • Responded to 200 storm drainage calls : - ✓ Swept up over 1.300 cubic yds of street debris Cleaned over 1,400 structures > _ Maintained 12+ acres of irrigated turf `. ,t,aL,„,,t ti; N. fA } c 1, ,,F' I r',1 ,1 T R,A.F F I ('•" ---rf . Ktx Conducted 144 ADT counts r --__ ,11 '° "- t Produced traffic plans for 12 major CIP projects . 0` is Responded to 233 C.A.R.E.S. Requests STOP4'j P' Replaced vehicle detection system at 2 intersections -- tett. f r r Installed battery backup systems at 3 intersections 8th/McDonald Safety Project t t Coordinated repair and sought reimbursement at �.. „ - _ ; L . 10 locations damaged as a result of vehicle crashes --- . • — - Installed new HAWK Traffic Signal at SR 27/ApplewayTrail . .. .. / )Worked with Library District to produce How To video . City's first HAWK signal ..1 1 I Reviewed over 50 developer's proposals related to traffic items \ J'' r Reviewed Traffic Modeling & roadway geometrics for BNSF 4 Grade Separation projects 6 , J;.y __ Ii mi 2O 1 7 TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS _._.._.._.._..r t .meq -•.� Argonne&Trent: ! �— ,, ' i New Detection& i _..i Euclid&Sullivan:. 1 Install Battery Back-up `" i Signal Upgrade i Park&Rutter 1 I Argonne&Montgomery: i RR Crossing Improvemen.1. :,,, Install Battery Back-up ---\.... j_____--- i t _i r•. "� SR27 @ Indiana: _ ! ,�.•� i 2RRCWSSiH9 Improvement4 i i..•.. Install Battery Back-up i i i Indiana&Evergreen: t ...a Argonne,Trent to Mission: - Detection Upgrade ! Timing Modifications I i r... I Evergreen&Mission Connector:Ell I ! New Dectection i Broadway&Ella: ) _ I. ! [Damaged RRFB Replaced ---__'f`-- ! �fi/ _.Pl I i _:.r..,- �� SR27©Appleway Trail. �..` .,_„i ��. Installed New HAWK Signal _ ,� i 1 l7:----1...�;1' C•, ' 8th&McDonald: I 'I • i t t ,_.._.._. ! ".- - Flashing Beacons �a..�..� -�• i .1.” 'a , _ L-----11....-; aha 16th&Sullivan: • `a , Damaged Cabinet Replaced :a x i 1 2017 Traffic Improvements r ,.._�.,_. t i • Safety Project _rt'' iDate:218/2018 • Signal/Operations Upgrade i i l • Signal Timing Work '••.• r /I\ CIP Project '.1_1 •. Esai,HERE.Deanna,Mapmylndia.ie OEenStreetMap contributors.and the GIS user community SOLID WASTE ,- --- in Third full year of program operations , , �-- lir/' 'Renegotiated solid waste contracts . -_ ' '' ,,........._, , ___. III� '11f+l ii Annual curbside clean-up program provided ;r _'' _ i4- ,..,., - ..,,_ ! ...._ ......., ., :, 4 iri, . , , (k. - Transfer Station: §r s _ 1 _ Garbage Yard Waste Recyclables ; � w-P-- (Tons) (Tons) (Tons) :- _,, M y xr 141411414111114 Commercial ` � '. Haulers 59, 160 85 • 'Pd�;i��Nal. inu uwd. it, iii Al Self Haul 12,717 4253 .. ��* . -4);;;, ,- _�- • „ . Total 77,877 4328 507 0.°94%!Lft, COMMUNITY & PUBLICWORKS Siokane STREET MAINTENANCE Valley " Street Maintenance Contracts — (Poe Asphalt —AAA Sweeping) Poe Asphalt contract $ 1 .366M Contributed $ 1 ,038,000 toward Pavement Preservation ; -Rig. Placed 4,800 tons of Asphalt Cracksealed 83 lane miles "r Maintained over 50 miles of gravel shouldered roadways, *+� { sidewalk and curb repair �- Completed $ 150K in stormwater repair projects , _ _ J ' . , ' Managed sweeping and vactor services contracts ' , AAA Sweeping contract — Street Sweeping $490K .` AAA Sweeping contract -Vactoring $ 189.9K . —~ y.' Geiger Work Crew — (7,280 man hours worked) " -: t ':5 . fw• Mowed and maintained 105 acres of dry land grass Removed 130,260 lbs of garbage/vegetation from City right-of-way Cleared ice and snow from City bridges Snow and Ice Removal 82 snow days with at least a trace of snow 63.5 inches of snowfall Completed four full City residential plows Applied 184,570 gallons of liquid deicer Applied 1 ,850 tons of granular deicer Total Snow Operations - $ 1 ,280,522 ($500,000 from Winter Reserve Fund) xR - F- • _. .' „ Y ' _ - • lik . 41 0.°94%!Lft, COMMUNITY & PUBLICWORKS Siokane ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Valley " LONG RANGE PLANS Reviewed amendments to the comprehensive plan Evaluated and recommended amendments to development regulations Responded to annexation requests Continued analyzing tourism strategies SPOKANE VALLEY TOURISM ANALYSIS PHASE II PROJECT PROFILES PRESENTED TO Leye15pe6ne Val:ey Spokane Valley PREPARED BY Comprehensive Plan amn,ryFn, n,. 201]- 3] 43 ADOPTED[MN..2016 OADINANCENO.16 OiE BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT Assisted 22 new and existing businesses Responded to five Requests for Information from ADO (including Amazon HQ2) S O K N Recruited a large manufacturer bringing an estimated 150 ‘7,4 Y PA L LA E EY manufacturing jobsECCNOM C°EVELOPMFN.- Coordinated the development of industrial recruitment brochures Streamlined permitting for industrial development in vacant CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY industrial land ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT TOOL BOX Continued improving business assistance:Available Properties, November2017 Incentive Area Map Refined Economic Toolbox identifying various local and state incentives for business development Engaged retail recruiter 44 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT Conducted Survey of Roadway Pavement Condition Integrated pavement management with other :: City programs to maximize efficiency and cost - 4 . Y savings .- t Coordinated with utility providers to align ti - F ` ,. w sa-w'..: -i ,.,+.' .:� '... pavement improvements with their capital - A. f - ' g{ projects _ 3 2 Prioritized pavement improvement projects with economic development initiatives , ,_ � � :.,.,, r 5►-. ` Researched software to assist withP avement ` , management TRANSPORTATION PLANNING Used Geographic Information Systems to integrate transportation planning with land use and economic development Amended the 2017Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Developed the 2018-2023 SixYearTIP Coordinated with SRTC on State Transportation Improvement Program Assisted WSDOT with statewide Economic Vitality Transportation indicators and City Safety Program Coordinated with neighboring jurisdictions on transportation projects SRTC Aft,h, SPOKANE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COUNCIL PLANNING & GRANTS Grant FundingApplications Submitted — 13 Valued At $61 Million - Grant Funding Applications Awarded — 6 Awarded At $ 10.3 Million a1 0 Transportation Improvement Board — 2 grants awarded for a combined total of $2. 19 Million. a f ` Barker Road Grade J Separation Project: P ,. New National Highway Freight Program - $6 million award received Roundabout y Washington State Legislative DirectAppropriation - $ 1 .5 million . ' C t MI received 4" .L• . - r - ' i.. Community Development Block Grant — Recommended funding of ��,,�'�""��r- $453,895. eo' ` Over y':. v _ s STRATEGIC MARKETING • Enhanced Economic Development website - , , 77 .."'` Ii Completed digital marketing campaign to increase awareness at a national level ` ky , 0. WHERE TRADITION MEETS AMBITION iii Completed eight"testimonial" recruitment videos featured online and , . : . .;, on social media , 0.0 I In partnership with Visit Spokane S P 0 K N E VALLEY Learn Completed a two-minute culinary video ore Updated city specific tourism brochure for regional distribution Secured professional photography services to expand our portfolio of photosniiral phot Initiated transition to a full-service email marketing service. creative by nature PUBLIC INFORMATION ■ Expanded Twitter to include Council/PC agendas, City Hall updates, community meetings, and other important community updates. Twitter followers — 377 followers ■ HotTopic issues: 3 Printed HotTopic distribution: 48,000 Email update subscribers: ■ Coordinated internal/external materials and outreach on City Hall address Media releases: 832 changes HotTopic: 961 ■ Coordinated with all departments for City Hall Grand Opening Traffic Alerts: 790 ■ Coordinated with Traffic Engineering and SCLD to produce HAWK signal informational video 49 Completed and closed out Department of Ecology 2015-2017 Coordinated Prevention Grant solid waste alternatives outreach and communications REGIONAL PARTNER COORDINATION • Continued collaboration with Visit Spokane Participated with Spokane-Kootenai Real Estate Committee to develop the regional real estate report Expanded involvement with the Greater Spokane Valley Chamber of Commerce Served on the Spokane Regional Planning Technical Advisory Committee Participated in Spokane Regional Transportation Council (SRTC) committees and working groups Attended meetings for Regional Site Selector S 'd n GREATER SPOKANE sRTc creative VALLEY CHAMBER b SPOHMHEREGIONAL TRANSPORTATION [OMR 50 nature OF COMMERCE COMMUNITY & PUBLICWORKS BUILDING & PLANNING CONSTRUCTION PERMITS ISSUED 5,000 4,500 4,763 4,000 4,349 3,500 3,961 3,993 3,000 3,431 2,500 2,000 1,500 1,000 500 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 52 PERMIT VALUATIONS - * in millions $262.5 $273.5 $300.0 $250.0 $ 173.9 $200.0 $150.0 $ 1 1 1 .9 $98.2 $100.0 $50.0 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 53 2017 MAJOR PROJECTS Maverick @ Sullivan $3. I M Katerra, Inc. foundation, $35 M Maverick @Argonne $3.3 M Riverside Place @ Coyote Rock, $2.5 M Sportsman's Warehouse $ 1 .5 M Pinecroft, $3.4 M CVSD, Riverbend Elementary School $ 12.8 M Capul Stoneworks, $ 1 .8 M CVSD, North Pines Middle School, $2 I .4 M Tuesday Morning, $ 1 .5 M Providence Medical Park, $ 1 M UPS Package Sorting Facility, $ 1 .4 M Carter's Oskosh Valley Mall, $ I M Avista: Dollar Rd. Phase 11, $2 1 .6 M Sprague Ave. Apartments, $9.3 M AutoNation Honda add, $3.5 M WEB PORTAL USE Total Applications Received vs Applications Received Online 47.37% 51.03% 27.96% 39.62% 1111 55 • Total Applications Received • Total Applications Received Online PLANNING - PROCESSED 121 LAND USE ACTIONS 30 27 30 23 25 20 13 I4 15 8 io 4 I s 2 0 56 BLA SHP SUB BSP FINAL CPA SEPA ADE CODE ENFORCEMENT - PROCESSED 522 COMPLAINTS 400 380 350 300 250 200 150 120 100 50 4 18 0 57 Stop Work order General Nuisance Property CODE ENFORCEMENT - 11617 E CARLISLE AVE ,, an 15.2Q18 7o.56AM 1 17(h 12,'2018 02 ,5P1. IN . ,• "'',, .,,,,,i; ,,,,,..4-. "'�, p , ),r,Il ' ,, , ,. ..._ , , _ t 3 . - i, iip., a -..'...le-C-A16--------"--- Y1 �� -dill w ' 3. �E.. PARKS & RECREATION OFm PARKS ADMINISTRATION AND MAINTENANCE SCITY pOlaile CENTERPLACE REGIONAL EVENT CENTER RECREATION AND AQUATICS •ONTalleyR SENIOR CENTER 59 PARKS & RECREATION PARKSADMINISTRATION & MAINTENANCE 17 rillit - ' it ad 0,....... 4. 4. •.,`,' ..-, ,, wii - . .. ..... 27. -,,, ..... . --....__ , Illit n, – -'• .4 ' :** _ Air . . ' ° . , '7• „ ie 4-.. .- — -- ___ IIIL ,,!"77 • Mrrl lliti ALc. ., • ,*,i,-, ,, - _ , -----,-_,___ --. "--.--„,.......„,.._ ., • -, , %--.". ' ' T-4:,.. - - ' .:"74kr ' '' -' 1.=Mil 3 ,‘.:, ' '' 't it- T1 - ''. '); ' 4 rrir ,,,, .- k ' .. 1 1• ',.- :- -:' ' -* ` .- , . .0, 44 ..;,- .. , 01. F„,,, . , 1,– .,? ,, I: ' $ '..!..Aw• 111\ , 'i . ' * illfArirA pi II I j g— .-.' ,, ':,1,,, • . ."-' ,e.•' + , , ,, .,....- ... ''. It • Z— ____—– ---„, ,,, _ _ • – _-.. , — J '- ,1-.J... F - ,411kii„' '''' Mia11116.- .. 'CL- 4.• ' - ____-- ,,,-„, r _ .,_ _ - r., — — Z_Aar. I _...._ 1 Maintained all park facilities. . 4,,,,;.-7, t-20,,..11 , ,v,, ,_ ..t-,,,..t,,-- ,,,,..., • Park facility reservations were over 500. 60 PARKS & RECREATION PARKS ADMINISTRATION & MAINTENANCE • Administered 29 Special Event Permits with f�, f; - ,. e M. , ; an estimated 79,000 total participants. �:,.„ i r Ill• Events included 14 walks/runs, 2 bike rides, $ ` ' x At e 3 car shows, Valleyfest, BBQ feed, • 1 I V. ., l Li -� : block party, etc. '-' r. y ,4-4 .. + - M1. r Ai o'''4114.1._,..16,x '‘' w ,vip.._:1.t'' s ''.1: 1.--: ' • { , �.. . 61 PARKS & RECREATION PARKS ADMINISTRATION & MAINTENANCE Worked with KSPS to bring *it • 4. yy, The Wall That Heals, the Vietnam Veterans Memorial Replica and l Mobile Education Center, : r v to Mirabeau Meadows. 10 F ., ,. 4 J„ , S,JtI �" „� • 1 . _ ...,. ii, _ _ .•......_ �a qy .�'la,s Pap Th, _ 'L� f,7uabn C,Aerm lkNa a.�q ,� • r' y Tirnt\amer ,; ti;' Learn maR ww.4Vllf m, } f i _ - JJ ■ ,, 11L , . __ .. , ii 62 PARKS & RECREATION PARKS ADMINISTRATION & MAINTENANCE • Worked with Public Works on the design and bid package for the Sullivan to Corbin section of the Appleway Trail. • Assisted in construction management of the Pines to Evergreen section of theApplewayTrail. S6 p ! ! ✓ -vfid _v • -- "'''''''=01111-* '--";-' s'-72--- — - .2' :_,-, e , ---• __ w • f ..- * + ii ts,:::: T y` .... . . 1 ... _ ......, 1, _ , iii__ I .�.,_ ilL - — -�� + ,.. rte ' g4, -- 7 4-- r ,k c ` 1 _ fit. :# -*~: + 63 PARKS & RECREATION PARKS ADMINISTRATION & MAINTENANCE Finished splash pad at Browns Park. • Added splash pad to Edgecliff Park. 1` a t z . rr �R l pF t� .�.f • or - 'P ' ,e ' -is . .4 .• y -.y r -. I 1::.:_____ CJI;, !-z '1' -;A-si ` _ IL x 5 jit, 4 i7.:: . Added trees and dog agility elements to Valley Mission Dog Park. 64 PARKS & RECREATION PARKS ADMINISTRATION & MAINTENANCE il . . --- � riplial .. Sit :� •y � ILE irt, . _..,„,.. .•.-7;,.i......,i:iit-:.-.i..:.:,. 11 ' . ! 'a34.,; "ion.4, , qr, , ,.4, .4,,,:40,11W-'':krFT,,,,'.-'_ ' t:.-. --, .: r„.,/-„,t„. . 0 illi ' . , . . • r ` m ,,: , , pfis! `ice ^� A rt. �! m * 1 Connections .! F r . . } ,s`� 7�-.- a '£�Fr - �s '” �"per^,� par g',r-. "_ �. if_ f :,.,.,,...• ,_;,-.• . , , -7tp,,,,,o4,,,,,--,...,-.--,, -,'. ,.., •-,Z,' "x,"-.L' ,..- V '',, .,,,:,, '',-,-..ck...14,1i,v,, ,, .. c �v I: 1..,,,.,,-.,. -.-.' 71'-- A x ,`, 71!x-: I y�itHi j. 9 .'� 1 [-`` -' _ � w .. Hosted Valleyfest at Mirabeau Point Park and CenterPlace. 65 PARKS & RECREATION CENTERPLACE REGIONAL EVENT CENTER - 1 41111 1174 - ATV P. 41e. ......c, "" _____ -- ,, --- . _ .. 1 ' ' ' i 4: I , its ilp — - Al . _, ./A• dIIII .. , /---7N.,::', ' • ' ..$1 - alli 8 - • ,,,, __",....3. Sh -' ' lei" i 1...^. --11111111%111 Oil°. . ,. 0 . • 1 7'I VIPIIIIIIIIIIIISIMINIPI :: ' t. UmpOLIA ligr ...4,...' , B•A.N.K ."•'' - a • •••• - _ N \ Y a ---miLle 4 / 1/4 1 1 JO i 'Thl,, i ,-- f , , .44,-... . iii,-- , • , ;II _,. . ..,....,., .. ..: ,. ..,...: . . ._ v 1.411,.1. . . 4 .... !,14. li . ' EI '- 416°4 61101 516----' • g Hosted Valleyfest at Mirabeau Point Park and CenterPlace. 66 PARKS & RECREATION CENTERPLACE REGIONAL EVENT CENTER CenterPlace West Lawn Master Plan was developed and approved by City Council. This will accommodate future large community events and weddings. k � � _: - I. . pp? Hosted Crave! Food and Drink a : � � ' ' Celebration for the first time, :i ",`,�.-- ,,, - n� fJ,� ',} ll � + , :. . n and is planned again for 2018. } X. 4, i rr,; n '1 ,y.�j.ill4 4i4 J , i. ,- y ir., , '....t, • 4 ill ' ' ,- --'ig_ d \\ 1 ,,.tea J' i f iii _ .;I ,y.^ }�q,'et i q .,..1, t_ yam^ ti I �� 14� Ef 1»� `� y / ( , ..,„ , „, :,::10_, . _ - II id Ait sm. , ill itr - 4,1' I i 1 ” a ( 7 -' Hosted Spokane Oktoberfest A 0 • for the first time, and is dik 8- '' �" planned again for 2018. 67 PARKS & RECREATION CENTERPLACE REGIONAL EVENT CENTER HDYMeottp@Wty.ReMp PA..6}NNIMA17,1=817. — _ • . . t; 4 f • Repaired a motor terminal leak within the II hiller tem y . Al� � system. fir•. _ . 6tlA _ Ys— ._ .'.�yf�f . ,,=i-. Ili. ��.: .0 .iimm �i_ yl} V�V \ .A • The Great Room/Dining Room AV Sound System was upgraded4'I` and expanded, including a high tech video wall and additional Replaced carpet ins1 441 monitor screens throughout. three meeting rooms. 68 PARKS & RECREATION CENTERPLACE REGIONAL EVENT CENTER - `�'� 't • Hosted annual INPRO y << Participated in the Northwest's Wedding Tour and Show.„ Premier Bridal Festivals in both . 4 fall and winter and various business fairs. lir- .:. H : et . � +i�.�sp' - L�R _ q V�_ t i - 404 ..,_ , e \ *4 jin, C , et”, 14. Its;:i vh in1) 71 • Hosted our own Open House ' _ � � * ` '_ of CenterPlace, highlighting F our facility and our caterer, ,,: r 1 ° , ,,; Le Catering. _.,r.,. ,�. r ' \ )„. CenterPlace hosted over 1 ,041 events in 2017 and booked 370 reservations for 2018. 69 . PARKS & RECREATION RECREATION Hired and trained seven summer staff for Summer Day Camp Program, EASTERN WA UINOTONU6'[ti'888„r y plus 10 (volunteer) youth in the Counselor in Training Program. - Jraasasoi,,, , ti V,,, st+ Served 519 happy campers during the 10-week Day Camp. _ -7'1.11-1,:::„. .., `� �`g ' ""RIM'""" ""��'4"`"`� .-�._� S `til w--- e , � I spa -- .� ,+. j ' 0. ` _'— I ' .14'x.. Y L , I a I �:. �011,190 Ilio 1 ,_ ., :, . ...,:. , ,. , .,,, . ir,'"1 ' r. ,',. t ` I rot - ' --- -, — „, . ,,,,,, . ___, _,. .,::.„,,,,,,, _ _,,,i _.,s.),,,,z,. . .„ .,, ,,i, ,iiikl ,„ , , rs .,..,,, ‘t-i,„ ,, i thiv v:t_..--;_,,_ , ._4k i 1,, . .ii -, -...-. 7„ I - \• i 1 s ti { r 7FRE , r�.: i `a .!% ` • +IMS _ K r • we • 7 A i - ' L AIL III P .c.,..„1...---- ri.,..,_ L 1 ,....., _.. , _. • , i 70 PARKS & RECREATION RECREATION IT'S ALL ABOUT THE FREE! � li 1 i PwIR'. !" Gint -4 • 1.4 0'.: ' ..f / its n �c `Y. a ! k 4: ' qtrtit. . �rygr®1 �. _ Azz�ry �I 1 �& � . .it,,,i lit le . WSECU f 4 V. \ i ! lir i -.'- ,,,-1) Provided three free SummerOffered Free Summer Park Program and • Outdoor Movies in the Park, y _p F _ served 2,351 eager children, including free serving over 750 viewers. The - , s breakfast and lunch through EVSD Meal movies were sponsored in part by Program. Waste Management and WSECU. , . I Free Fun Friday events in July were enjoyed. 7l PARKS & RECREATION RECREATION ,... . . .. Hosted 10th annual Breakfast • • _ _ . •-- . With Santa,Santa, with 485 attending, . . . : • . . .--- - - -- ..e..... and coordinating 45 high . . .•. . . . . " ....--.- -- ,...... . school volunteers. ..._ . , ..• .. . -:), •- ... • Ai '...4t.w."-...-- f, ' t• , -i''. .:1 I 491 . — . 1.1 N,. ,) ' - . .... , ,. i-1 ,..,. , „„ _ ,..' i,,,,, ,Illr ,:i .\:11117-1 "' ... , .,,. 1 - r-- a • ,_, ,. ; •-: 1" 1,1 1,A ' ,.-12.0 )1'7'4' 7- -.•'...?..' '..'4'1 , --: 4 - I \,. , - ti I! Afri— f ,--,,,,M•tti .. • • : f oi44 , .,1 iti ' .--,_,i- , 1 , =, It 10 .: ' 1 14 41Ip s 1 . -: .--kk Of j O' ., )%4 ',;; e —•-• PV .ii '.,,,-t, ..,•iNf'.., 1/..,I '' ' ' AL ' I A • ---: v. 0._• .. . I Held our 5th annual Winter Break Cool Camp. 72 PARKS & RECREATION AQUATICS Had over 34,964 open swim, 1 ,490 swim lesson, 884 , . ;:.., water exercise, and 157 swim team participants. r -------"."1,411k ;, ,, ,i Summer Day Camp campers had several trips to the "' ` ' ee pools. r 1IF d 4 "' rrarrrrryfrrowir fflrr/N Firpripitioised31171a r` r- Matti 4.'. - ' `rr`s'a''''4 err F t. rr/iY te' _ 'A\ : i _ _ r r ti 73 PARKS & RECREATION k AQUATICS Held 6th annual "Paws in the Pool" There were numerous pool repairs to all three pools, dog swim event. including a new pump, boiler bypass, and lap drains and As b �� . plumbing. ',' \ r , � a a 1s {tit s jaa -0t.� r f I .. iiirms,,,,„ ,__ _ 4 r: ,____. i 11P* 1 , -4 p ,--. ; ,) ''t -11" ' ' 74 PARKS & RECREATION SENIOR CENTER Yp n _ Hosted the 6t" annual -, . , : PARKS & RECREATION SENIOR CENTER • Continued to provide a wide variety of programs, events, activities, classes, seminars for health and well being, and general information for services and/or assistance. INTFrA.A. rbt __ ,:. ._ , _,t, • ` - moi. r ala l 1 ____. , Ai . ,,,,, 17- I P- fil _ J f ,� _._._ f P. c ,,;- Sarr I� ;�... ,, ,a 4111 - — - �1'qs rl. .. . 19 _ 7 4 _ i. 1 1 i 41 rk 76 SPOKANE VALLEY Siokane POLICE DEPARTMENT Valley " SPOKANE VALLEY POLICE DEPARTMENT PATROL DIVISION Total citizen initiated calls for service (CFS) increased to 44,210 in 2017 (highest level in SVPD's history). CFS receiving deputy response were also at a new high 27, 102. Nevertheless, citizen complaints per 1 ,000 officer incidents decreased nearly 9% in 2017. Use of Force incidents were also down 24%. Most commissioned personnel attended the Crisis Intervention Training, an 8-hour class, with some completing the 40-hour class. 78 SPOKANE VALLEY POLICE DEPARTMENT TRAFFIC UNIT Spokane Valley reported traffic collisions down 8% from 2016. The unit maintained high productivity in its traffic enforcement. SVPD Traffic Deputy Todd Miller made 218 DUI arrests in 2017; this includes 36 arrests for marijuana intoxication and 14 arrests for impairment due to other drugs (27 DUI arrests and 8 blood draws were done while training new deputies). The Traffic Unit investigated five fatality and six serious injury traffic collisions. In cooperation with SCSO,Traffic Investigators utilized the FARO Laser Scanner throughout the year on numerous traffic collisions; they also assisted with seven major crimes incidents using the FARO Laser Scanner to map the crime scene. 79 SPOKANE VALLEY POLICE DEPARTMENT TRAFFIC SCHOOL 481 drivers participated in the program in Spokane Valley Continues to provide the option of attending an educational class in lieu of paying a fine Voluntary Program Positive evaluations from those who attend 80 SPOKANE VALLEY POLICE DEPARTMENT INVESTIGATIONS: INTELLIGENCE-LED POLICING ILP continues to evolve within the Spokane Valley Investigative Unit (SVIU) SVIU continues to work directly with Patrol to target criminals in Spokane Valley who are the prolific, repeat offenders or who show some sort of organization or structure among their enterprise Search Warrants: 13 ILP residences, recovering nearly $ 100,000 in stolen property from one residence Combined SO and SV Property Crimes Task Force operated out of the SVPD during first half of 2017; 174 arrested for 727 felony and 180 misdemeanor charges Second half of 2017 SVIU had 185 arrested for 1 ,894 felony and 98 misdemeanor charges Excellent collaboration between SVIU and the Patrol Division as well as the community lends to the Unit's success 81 SPOKANE VALLEY POLICE DEPARTMENT CRIME PREVENTION The Spokane Valley Police Department is committed to providing educational training to Spokane Valley citizens and businesses in an effort to better protect themselves from criminal activity. In 2017, SVPD Crime Prevention Deputy Chris Johnston provided the following training and assessment services to the community: 33 Active-Shooter Presentations 32 Personal Safety Presentations 37 Business/Community Security Surveys 12 Workplace Violence Prevention Presentations 82 SPOKANE VALLEY POLICE DEPARTMENT HIRING/RECRUITMENT In 2017, 13 officer candidates and 6 lateral deputies were hired by the Spokane County Sheriff's Office Does not include the 10 officer candidates processed in 2017 but hired in 2018 as we did not have an academy to send them to until February 2018 SCSO/SVPD recruitment team participated in: 7 Public Safety Testing Events 4 Civil Service Open House/Workshops 8 Campus/Military Installation Recruitment Visits 7 Career Fairs and Events in the Region Completed a comparison audit of hiring process with Civil Service to reduce the time between testing and point of hiring 83 SPOKANE VALLEY POLICE DEPARTMENT VALLEY PRECINCT Continued our efforts on remodeling of the old booking area to facilitate more workstations Implemented Sheriff's Employee Tracking Software (SETS) throughout ALL divisions of the Sheriff's Office Software development has been in the works for approx. five years and is instrumental in tracking schedules, training and overtime drivers Implemented new employee evaluation software Continue to make enhancements in SCOPE Investigative support personnel to assist detectives in reviewing surveillance video and making victim call backs In cooperation with McDonald's, implemented "Coffee With a Cop" Program to engage in a dialogue with the community 84 CITY HALL OPEN HOUSE & RIBBON CUTTING Design: 1 Efficiency, tradition and functionality tai. LO _- _- ilb- 1 I Mr _- I -T. C-- Materials represent: • 1 • River, orchards, agriculture and opportunity - - I -Aill I i - Designed to accommodate reasonable expansion during its 50- 100 year expected life use. ilie r - i % Welcome to your building Spokane Valley! 85 Total Project Cost: '�- �°°-- - Project Funding: $ 14, 150,000 � ' ` ', ,-,..,,,,i00.- ,------ r $6.3 million cash _-. �__. $7.85 million LTGO bond Land acquisition .=.7411,lk IS iii iii iiii .2:.611111 lir Design services ,..- �s �``f Bond repayment over 30 years i Construction & related -, .0., n i, :. �� - Annual bond payment: $399,888 sales tax ,� ,� / Annual interest rate: 2.91 _ „ . '•• ' - Furniture fixtures, & "** .° I''." T '"` ' ":A equipmente/b .{ L,.�� ` r' AL ,,,A,, r Full basement if . s ... * °' '" Ir. ji F, Landscaping Hardscaping l j Undergrounded utilities 4' /f , , a- " ' 11 , ' Permit fees '"`" PROJECT WAS DELIVERED ON BUDGET IN TERMS OF BOTH TIME AND MONEY 86 DRAFT ADVANCE AGENDA as of March 1,2018; 12:00 pm Please note this is a work in progress;items are tentative To: Council& Staff From: City Clerk,by direction of City Manager Re: Draft Schedule for Upcoming Council Meetings March 13,2018,Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Tue Mar 61 Proclamation: Honoring Nancy Hill, SCRAPS Director 1. PUBLIC HEARING: Proposed Amended 2018 TIP—Colin Quinn-Hurst (15 minutes) la. Proposed Resolution Amending 2018 TIP 2. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 3. Second Reading Ordinance 18-006 False Alarm Code Amendment—Morgan Koudelka (10 minutes) 4.First Reading Ordinance, 18-007, Small Cell—Erik Lamb (15 minutes) 5.Motion Consideration: CRAVE Contract—Lesli Brassfield (10 minutes) 6.Motion Consideration: Potential Grant Opportunities(FMSIB)—Adam Jackson (20 minutes) 7.Admin Rpt: Potential Grant Oppor. (SRTC, SRTS,PBP,CSP)—Colin Quinn-Hurst,A.Jackson(45 mins) 8.Admin report: Barker BNSF Grade Separation Alternatives—John Hohman (45 minutes) 9.Advance Agenda (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting: 170 mins] March 20,2018, Study Session,6:00 p.m. [due Tue Mar 131 1. Stn Ave. Sidewalk—Thierman to Dickey-Erica Amsden,Gloria Mantz (10 minutes) 2.Floodplain FEMA Process—Henry Allen (15 minutes) 3. Painted Hills Update—John Hohman, Cary Driskell,Erik Lamb (25 minutes) 4. Street O&M Pavement Preservation& Street Construction—Adam Jackson,Mike Basinger (60 minutes) 5.Franchise Agreements with Cell Carriers—Cary Driskell (20 minutes) 6.Advance Agenda (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting: 135 mins] March 27,2018,Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Tue Mar 201 1. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 2. Second reading ordinance 18-007 Small Cell—Erik Lamb (15 minutes) 3.First Reading Proposed Ordinance w/Cell Carrier MClmetro—Cary Driskell (10 minutes) 4.First Reading Proposed Ordinance w/Cell Carrier Verizon—Cary Driskell (10 minutes) 5.Motion Consideration, Sprague Ave. Preser. Project-Sullivan to Corbin—E.Amsden, Gloria Mantz(15 min) 6.Motion Consideration: ITS Infill Phase 1 Project,Bid Award-G.Mantz, C.Aldworth (10 minutes) 7.Motion Consideration: Potential Grant Opportunities: (a) SRTC,(b) SRTS,(c) PBP, and (d)CSP)—Adam Jackson,Colin Quinn-Hurst (20 minutes) 8.Admin Report: Legislative Update: Chelsea Hager,Briahna Murray of Gordon Thomas Honeywell(45 min) 9.Advance Agenda (5 minutes) 10. Info Item: Department Reports [*estimated meeting: 135 mins] April 3,2018, Study Session,6:00 p.m. [due Tue Mar 271 1.Airport Update—Larry Krauter (15 minutes) 2. GSI Contract—John Hohman,Mike Basinger (15 minutes) 3.Admin Report: Outside Agency,Allocation History/Discussion—Chelsie Taylor (20 minutes) 4.Admin Report: Economic Analysis of Tourism Related Venues&Events—Chelsie Taylor (45 minutes) 5.Advance Agenda (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting: 100 mins] Draft Advance Agenda 3/1/2018 3:32:52 PM Page 1 of 2 April 10,2018,Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Tue April 31 1. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 2. Second Reading Proposed Ordinance w/Cell Carrier MClmetro—Cary Driskell (10 minutes) 3. Second Reading Proposed Ordinance w/Cell Carrier Verizon—Cary Driskell (10 minutes) 4.Advance Agenda (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting: mins] April 17,2018, Study Session,6:00 p.m. [due Tue April 101 ACTION ITEMS: 1.Motion Consideration: 8th Ave. Sidewalk,Thierman to Dickey-Erica Amsden, Gloria Mantz (10 minutes) NON-ACTION ITEMS: 2. Quarterly Police Department Report—Chief Werner (10 minutes) 3.Advance Agenda—Mayor Higgins (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting: mins] April 24,2018,Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Tue April 171 1. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 2.Advance Agenda (5 minutes) 3. Info Item: Department Reports [*estimated meeting: mins] May 1,2018, Study Session,6:00 p.m. [due Tue April 241 1.Advance Agenda (5 minutes) May 8,2018,Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Tue May 11 1. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 2.Advance Agenda (5 minutes) May 15,2018, Study Session, 6:00 p.m. [due Tue May 81 1.Advance Agenda (5 minutes) May 22,2018,Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Tue May 151 1. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 2.Advance Agenda (5 minutes) 3. Info Item: Department Reports May 29,2018, Study Session, 6:00 p.m. [due Tue May 221 1.Advance Agenda *time for public or Council comments not included OTHER PENDING AND/OR UPCOMING ISSUES/MEETINGS: Animal Control Regulations (SVMC 7.30) Police Dept. Quarterly Rpt(April,July,Oct,Jan) BNSF 2nd Rail Police Precinct Lease Renewal(Nov '18) Camping in RVs Retail Recruitment Follow-up Citizen Recognition(city keys) Sign Ordinance City Hall Generator Spokane Regional Health District Opioid Epidemic Donation Recognition Street Illumination(ownership,cost,location) Duplex/Single Family Dwellings Definition Tobacco 21 Resolution Governance Manual Transportation&Infrastructure ITS/SRTMC Discussion SV Youth Voices Legislative Remote Testimony(Chambers) Utility Facilities in ROW Naming City Facilities Protocol 2018 Budget Amendment Neighborhood Restoration Program Draft Advance Agenda 3/1/2018 3:32:52 PM Page 2 of 2