The URL can be used to link to this page

2018, 05-29 Study SessionAGENDA SPOKANE VALLEY CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION FORMAT (with some action items) Tuesday, May 29, 2018 CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10210 E Sprague Avenue (Please Silence Your Cell Phones During the Meeting) 6:00 p.m. CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL ACTION ITEMS: 1. Second Reading Ordinance 18-011 Amending 2018 Budget — Chelsie Taylor [public comment] 2. Mayoral Appointment: Continuum of Care for the Homeless — Mayor Higgins [public comment] 3. Motion Consideration: Spokane County Interlocal Agreement, Highland Estates Connector — Bill Helbig [public comment] DISCUSSION LEADER SUBJECT/ACTIVITY GOAL NON -ACTION ITEMS: 4. Larry Krauter, CEO, Spokane Airports 5. Cary Driskell, Mike Stone 6. Chelsie Taylor, Erik Lamb, John Hohman 7. Chelsie Taylor 8. Cary Driskell 9. Mayor Higgins Spokane Airport Projects Arts in Public Spaces Street O&M Fund #101 Level of Service/Financial Challenges Economic Analysis of Tourism Related Venues & Events Splashdown Contract Advance Agenda 10. Information Only: Police Department Monthly Report 11. Mayor Higgins 12. Mark Calhoun ADJOURN Council Check in City Manager Comments Discussion/Information Discussion/Information Discussion/Information Discussion/Information Discussion/Information Discussion/Information Discussion/Information Discussion/Information Study Session Agenda, May 29, 2018 Page 1 of 1 P:\City Clerk\AgendaPackets for Web\2018\2018, 05-29\item 1 2018 05 29 RCA 2nd read Ord 18-011 Amend 2018 budg.docx Meeting Date: CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action May 29, 2018 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ® new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Second reading of proposed Ordinance #18-011 which amends the 2018 Budget. GOVERNING LEGISLATION: In order for the City to amend an adopted budget, State law requires the Council to approve an ordinance that appropriates additional funds. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: The Council last took formal action on the 2018 Budget when it was adopted on November 14, 2017. On May 8, 2018, an Administrative Report was delivered to Council regarding the need for a budget amendment. On May 22, 2018, a public hearing was held on this topic and Ordinance #18-011 was advanced to a second reading. BACKGROUND: Since the initial adoption of the 2018 Budget on November 14, 2017, a number of events have transpired in the normal course of operations that necessitate a 2018 Budget amendment. Proposed amendments include: #001 - General Fund Provide additional appropriations (expenditures) of $3,492,429 comprised of: • $7,000 additional in filing and recording fees for the Office of the City Attorney due to an increased ability to process code enforcement cases with the half-time attorney position that was added in the 2018 Budget. • Net $0 additional expenditures related to repurposing a vacant Senior Plans Examiner position in the Building Division to an Engineering Technician II position in the Engineering Division due to workflow needs. • $490,000 to replenish the Winter Weather Reserve Fund #122 back to a fund balance of $500,000. The City had $500,000 in winter weather response expenditures from Fund #122 during 2017. • $2,795,429 transferred to Capital Reserve Fund #312 which represents the 2016 yearend fund balance in excess of 50% of recurring expenditures. • $200,000 additional nonrecurring expenditure for a generator at City Hall. #103 — Paths & Trails Fund Expenditures are increased by $50,000 for a transfer out to the Parks Capital Projects Fund #309. This transfer out in part pays for increased costs for the Sullivan to Corbin section of the Appleway Trail which was discussed at the January 16, 2018 Council meeting. #122 — Winter Weather Reserve Fund Revenues are increased by $490,000 reflecting a transfer in from the General Fund #001 to replenish the fund balance to $500,000 after having $500,000 in winter weather response expenditures during 2017. #309 — Parks Capital Projects Fund 1 P:\City Clerk\AgendaPackets for Web\2018\2018, 05-29\item 1 2018 05 29 RCA 2nd read Ord 18-011 Amend 2018 budg.docx Revenues are increased by $50,000 due to a transfer in from the Paths & Trails Fund #103 for the Sullivan to Corbin section of the Appleway Trail. Expenditures are increased by $233,000 due to increased costs for the Sullivan to Corbin section of the Appleway Trail which was discussed at the January 16, 2018 Council meeting. #312 — Capital Reserve Fund Revenues are increased due to a transfer of $2,795,429 from General Fund #001 which represents the 2016 yearend fund balance in excess of 50% of recurring expenditures. The 2018 Budget amendment reflects the changes noted above and will affect 5 funds resulting in total revenue increases of $3,335,429 and expenditure increases of $3,775,429. 001 General Fund 103 Paths & Trails Fund 122 Winter Weather Reserve Fund 309 Parks Capital Projects Fund 312 Capital Reserve Fund 0 3,492,429 0 50,000 490,000 0 50,000 233,000 2,795,429 0 3,335,429 3,775,429 The 2018 Budget amendment also includes changes to the Full Time Equivalent Employees schedule in the 2018 Budget in order to reflect repurposing a vacant Senior Plans Examiner position in the Building Division to an Engineering Technician II position in the Engineering Division due to workflow needs. The updated schedule is included as an attachment to this RCA. OPTIONS: Options are to accept the proposed amendments in whole or in -part. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to approve Ordinance #18-011 amending Ordinance #17-014 which adopted a budget for the period January 1, 2018 through December 31, 2018. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: This action amends the estimated revenues and appropriations for the 2018 Budget that was adopted on November 14, 2017. There are adequate funds available to pay for these amendments. STAFF CONTACT: Chelsie Taylor, Finance Director ATTACHMENTS: • Ordinance #18-011 • Fund level line -item detail of revenues and expenditures. • Fund summaries for all funds affected by the proposed budget amendment. • Proposed amended Full Time Equivalent Employees schedule. 2 Revenue Expenditure Fund Fund Increase Increase No. Name (Decrease) (Decrease) 001 General Fund 103 Paths & Trails Fund 122 Winter Weather Reserve Fund 309 Parks Capital Projects Fund 312 Capital Reserve Fund 0 3,492,429 0 50,000 490,000 0 50,000 233,000 2,795,429 0 3,335,429 3,775,429 The 2018 Budget amendment also includes changes to the Full Time Equivalent Employees schedule in the 2018 Budget in order to reflect repurposing a vacant Senior Plans Examiner position in the Building Division to an Engineering Technician II position in the Engineering Division due to workflow needs. The updated schedule is included as an attachment to this RCA. OPTIONS: Options are to accept the proposed amendments in whole or in -part. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to approve Ordinance #18-011 amending Ordinance #17-014 which adopted a budget for the period January 1, 2018 through December 31, 2018. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: This action amends the estimated revenues and appropriations for the 2018 Budget that was adopted on November 14, 2017. There are adequate funds available to pay for these amendments. STAFF CONTACT: Chelsie Taylor, Finance Director ATTACHMENTS: • Ordinance #18-011 • Fund level line -item detail of revenues and expenditures. • Fund summaries for all funds affected by the proposed budget amendment. • Proposed amended Full Time Equivalent Employees schedule. 2 DRAFT CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 18-011 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON, AMENDING ORDINANCE 17-014, WHICH ADOPTED A BUDGET FOR THE PERIOD JANUARY 1, 2018 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2018; AND OTHER MATTERS RELATED THERETO. WHEREAS, the City Council approved Ordinance 17-014 on November 14, 2017, which adopted the 2018 annual budget; and WHEREAS, subsequent to the November 14, 2017 adoption of the 2018 annual budget, it has become necessary to make changes by adding new revenue, appropriations, amendments, and transferring funds in order to properly perform City functions, services and activities; and WHEREAS, certain changes to employee positions have been made by the City Manager, which necessitate changes to the allocation of full time equivalent employees among City departments and funds; and WHEREAS, the budget changes set forth in this Ordinance could not have been reasonably anticipated or known when the 2018 annual budget was passed by the City Council; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the best interests of the City are served by amending the 2018 budget to reflect unanticipated revenue, expenditures, transfers, and appropriating the same as set forth herein. NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley, Washington do ordain as follows: Section 1. Amended Revenues and Appropriations. Ordinance No. 17-014 adopted a budget for the twelve months beginning January 1, 2018 and ending December 31, 2018. Each item, revenue, appropriation, and fund contained in Section 1 of Ordinance 17-014 is hereby further amended as set forth in Attachment A to this Ordinance, which is incorporated herein. Section 2. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance. Section 3. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect five days after publication of this Ordinance or a summary thereof in the official newspaper of the City as provided by law. Passed by the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley this day of May 2018. ATTEST: L.R. Higgins, Mayor Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Approved as to form: Ordinance 18-011 amending the 2018 budget Page 1 of 3 Office of the City Attorney Date of Publication: Effective Date: Ordinance 18-011 amending the 2018 budget Page 2 of 3 ATTACHMENT A Sources Uses Fund No. Annual Appropriation Funds Beginning Fund Balance Reve nue s Total Sources Appropriations Estimate d Ending Fund Balance Adopted via Ord. 17-014 Amended via Ord. 18-011 Total Revenues Adopted via Ord. 17-014 Amended via Ord. 18-011 Total Appropriations 001 General 32,946,667 43,048,025 0 43,048,025 75,994,692 42,625,888 3,492,429 46,118,317 29,876,375 101 Street O&M 1,075,927 4,172,200 0 4,172,200 5,248,127 4,602,291 0 4,602,291 645,836 103 Paths & Trails 46,324 8,700 0 8,700 55,024 0 50,000 50,000 5,024 104 Hotel/Motel Tax - Tourism Facilities 1,228,595 378,500 0 378,500 1,607,095 0 0 0 1,607,095 105 Hotel/Motel Tax 221,867 581,000 0 581,000 802,867 602,000 0 602,000 200,867 106 Solid Waste 178,014 225,000 0 225,000 403,014 225,000 0 225,000 178,014 107 PEG 54,837 79,000 0 79,000 133,837 71,200 0 71,200 62,637 120 CenterPlace Operating Reserve 300,000 0 0 0 300,000 0 0 0 300,000 121 Service Level Stabilization 5,500,000 0 0 0 5,500,000 0 0 0 5,500,000 122 Winter Weather Reserve 7,717 3,500 490,000 493,500 501,217 500,000 0 500,000 1,217 204 Debt Service LTGO 03 0 977,400 0 977,400 977,400 977,400 0 977,400 0 301 Capital Projects 2,125,374 807,500 0 807,500 2,932,874 1,816,181 0 1,816,181 1,116,693 302 Special Capital Projects 3,008,424 808,000 0 808,000 3,816,424 1,770,873 0 1,770,873 2,045,551 303 Street Capital Projects 71,190 11,151,790 0 11,151,790 11,222,980 11,151,790 0 11,151,790 71,190 309 Parks Capital Projects 126,202 2,577,300 50,000 2,627,300 2,753,502 2,441,300 233,000 2,674,300 79,202 310 Civic Facilities Capital Projects 843,688 5,900 0 5,900 849,588 0 0 0 849,588 311 Pavement Preservation 3,358,006 4,973,200 0 4,973,200 8,331,206 4,058,600 0 4,058,600 4,272,606 312 Capital Reserve 4,427,286 1,090,960 2,795,429 3,886,389 8,313,675 439,100 0 439,100 7,874,575 313 City Hall Construction 93,511 0 0 0 93,511 74,960 0 74,960 18,551 314 Railroad Grade Separation Projects 1,068,803 1,919,921 0 1,919,921 2,988,724 2,919,921 0 2,919,921 68,803 56,682,432 72,807,896 3,335,429 76,143,325 132,825,757 74,276,504 3,775,429 78,051,933 54,773,824 Sources Uses Reve nue s Appropriations Estimate d Beginning Ending Fund Working Adopted via Amended via Total Total Adopted via Amended via Total Working No. Working Capital Funds Capital Ord. 17-014 Ord. 18-011 Revenues Sources Ord. 17-014 Ord. 18-011 Appropriations Capital 402 Stormwater Management 1,985,316 1,942,500 0 1,942,500 3,927,816 2,299,089 0 2,299,089 1,628,727 403 Aquifer Protection Area 1,413,073 460,000 0 460,000 1,873,073 400,000 0 400,000 1,473,073 501 Equipment Rental & Replacement 1,096,283 182,529 0 182,529 1,278,812 20,000 0 20,000 1,258,812 502 Risk Management 244,261 370,000 0 370,000 614,261 370,000 0 370,000 244,261 4,738,933 2,955,029 0 2,955,029 7,693,962 3,089,089 0 3,089,089 4,604,873 Total of all Funds 61,421,365 75,762,925 3,335,429 79,098,354 140,519,719 77,365,593 3,775,429 81,141,022 59,378,697 Ordinance 18-011 amending the 2018 budget Page 3 of 3 P:\Finance\2018 Budget\Amendment #1\2018 05 29 2nd Reading\2018 Amendment No 1 Detail v2 for RCA.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA 2018 Budget -Amendment #1 Line Item Detail 5/29/2018 Account Description Account Number Description / Justification Initial Budget Amendment Amended Budget #001 - General Fund Recurring Expenditures Filing & Recording Fees Salaries & Wages Employee Benefits & Payroll Taxes Salaries & Wages Employee Benefits & Payroll Taxes 001.013.015.515.32.49.05 001.040.041.543.10.10.00 001.040.041.543.10.20.xx 001.040.043.558.50.10.00 001.040.043.558.50.20.xx Nonrecurring expenditures Transfer out - #122 Transfer out - #312 Heavy Machinery & Equipment 001.090.000.597.12.00.20 001.090.000.597.31.00.20 001.090.099.594.18.64.05 #103 - Paths & Trails Fund Expenditures Transfer out - #309 - Increase in filing fees due to increased code enforcement activity - Repurpose Senior Plans Examiner to Engineering Tech II - Repurpose Senior Plans Examiner to Engineering Tech II - Repurpose Senior Plans Examiner to Engineering Tech II - Repurpose Senior Plans Examiner to Engineering Tech II Total recurring expenditures - Replenish Winter Weather Reserve - 2016 #001 fund bal > 50% - Generator for City Hall Total nonrecurring expenditures 3,000 579,006 253,135 949,296 471,645 7,000 10,000 35,550 614,556 20,568 273,703 (35,550) 913,746 (20,568) 451,077 7,000 0 490,000 0 2,795,429 0 200,000 3,485,429 Total of all General Fund revenues Total of all General Fund expenditures 0 3,492,429 103.103.000.597.30.00.90 - Appleway Trail - Sullivan to Corbin #122 - Winter Weather Reserve Fund Revenues Transfer in - #001 122.122.000.397.00.10 Total expenditures - Replenish Winter Weather Reserve Total revenues Page 1 of 2 0 50,000 50,000 490,000 2,795,429 200,000 50,000 0 490,000 490,000 490,000 P:\Finance\2018 Budget\Amendment #1\2018 05 29 2nd Reading\2018 Amendment No 1 Detail v2 for RCA.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA 2018 Budget -Amendment #1 Line Item Detail 5/29/2018 Account Description Account Number Description / Justification Initial Budget Amendment Amended Budget #309 - ParksCapital Projects Fund Revenues Transfer in - #103 309.000.237.397.10.30 - Appleway Trail - Sullivan to Corbin Total revenues 0 50,000 50,000 50,000 Expenditures Appleway Trail - Sullivan to Corbin 303.000.237.595.xx.xx.xx - Construction costs in excess of estimates 1,853,300 233,000 2,086,300 #312 - Capital Reserve Fund Revenues Transfer in - #001 Total expenditures 312.000.000.397.00.10 - 2016 #001 fund bal > 50% Total revenues Totals Across all Funds 233,000 0 2,795,429 2,795,429 2,795,429 Total revenues Total expenditures 3,335,429 3,775,429 Page 2 of 2 P:\Finance\2018 Budget\Amendment #1\2018 05 29 2nd Reading\Budget Summary for Amended Funds.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA 2018 Budget Amendment 2018 As Adopted Proposed Amendment As Amended #001 - GENERAL FUND RECURRING ACTIVITY Revenues Property Tax 11,796,100 0 11,796,100 Sales Tax 20,881,900 0 20,881,900 Sales Tax - Public Safety 967,800 0 967,800 Sales Tax - Criminal Justice 1,738,000 0 1,738,000 Gambling Tax and Leasehold Excise Tax 381,000 0 381,000 Franchise Fees/Business Registration 1,210,000 0 1,210,000 State Shared Revenues 2,109,600 0 2,109,600 Fines and Forfeitures/Public Safety 1,319,900 0 1,319,900 Community and Public Works 1,684,100 0 1,684,100 Recreation Program Revenues 633,300 0 633,300 Miscellaneous Department Revenue 1,000 0 1,000 Miscellaneous & Investment Interest 201,800 0 201,800 Transfers in - #101 (street admin) 39,700 0 39,700 Transfers in - #105 (h/m tax -CP advertising) 30,000 0 30,000 Transfers in - #402 (storm admin) 13,400 0 13,400 Total Recurring Revenues 43,007,600 0 43,007,600 Expenditures City Council 548,494 0 548,494 City Manager 956,245 0 956,245 City Attorney 594,752 7,000 601,752 Public Safety 25,464,251 0 25,464,251 Deputy City Manager 450,663 0 450,663 Finance / IT 1,339,064 0 1,339,064 Human Resources 275,387 0 275,387 City Hall Operations and Maintenance 306,043 0 306,043 Community & Public Works - Engineering 1,572,947 56,118 1,629,065 Community & Public Works - Economic Develop 970,642 0 970,642 Community & Public Works - Building & Planninc 2,265,677 (56,118) 2,209,559 Parks & Rec - Administration 301,083 0 301,083 Parks & Rec - Maintenance 893,700 0 893,700 Parks & Rec - Recreation 260,574 0 260,574 Parks & Rec - Aquatics 492,900 0 492,900 Parks & Rec - Senior Center 98,229 0 98,229 Parks & Rec - CenterPlace 910,468 0 910,468 General Government 1,261,610 0 1,261,610 Transfers out - #204 (LTGO debt service) 399,350 0 399,350 Transfers out - #309 (park capital projects) 160,000 0 160,000 Transfers out - #311 (pavement preservation) 962,700 0 962,700 Transfers out - #501 (CenterPlace kitchen reserve) 36,600 0 36,600 Transfers out - #502 (insurance premium) 370,000 0 370,000 Total Recurring Expenditures Recurring Revenues Over (Under) Recurring Expenditures 40, 891, 379 7,000 40, 898, 379 2,116,221 (7,000) 2,109,221 Page 1 of 4 5/29/2018 P:\Finance\2018 Budget\Amendment #1\2018 05 29 2nd Reading\Budget Summary for Amended Funds.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA 2018 Budget Amendment #001 - GENERAL FUND - continued NONRECURRING ACTIVITY Revenues Transfers in - #106 (solid waste repayment) Total Nonrecurring Revenues 2018 As Adopted Proposed Amendment As Amended 40,425 0 40,425 40,425 0 40,425 Expenditures General Government - IT capital replacements 115,000 0 115,000 City Attorney (part-time attorney furniture) 4,809 0 4,809 Public Safety (full facility generator) 100,000 0 100,000 Deputy City Manager (Q -Alert software) 11,700 0 11,700 Parks & Rec (Flooring in Great Room & Dining Roor 50,000 0 50,000 Parks & Rec (CP reseal two restroom floors) 3,000 0 3,000 Economic Development (retail recruitment) 50,000 0 50,000 Generator for City Hall 0 200,000 200,000 Transfers out - #122 (replenish reserve) 0 490,000 490,000 Transfers out - #309 (CP outdoor venue Phase 1) 200,000 0 200,000 Transfers out - #309 (Browns Park lighting & path) 200,000 0 200,000 Transfers out - #312 (misc capital projects) 1,000,000 0 1,000,000 Transfers out - #312 ('16 fund bal > 50%) 0 2,795,429 2,795,429 Total Nonrecurring Expenditures 1,734,509 3,485,429 5,219,938 Nonrecurring Revenues Over (Under) Nonrecurring Expenditures Excess (Deficit) of Total Revenues Over (Under) Total Expenditures Beginning unrestricted fund balance Ending unrestricted fund balance Fund balance as a percent of recurring expenditures SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS #103 - PATHS & TRAILS FUND RECURRING ACTIVITY Revenues Motor Vehicle Fuel (Gas) Tax Investment Interest Total revenues (1,694,084) (3,485,429) (5,179,513) 422,137 (3,492,429) (3,070,292) 32, 946, 667 32, 946, 667 33, 368, 804 29, 876, 375 81.60% 8,700 0 73.05% 0 8,700 0 0 8,700 0 8,700 Expenditures Transfers out - #309 (Appleway Trail - Sullivan to CI 0 50,000 50,000 Total expenditures 0 50,000 50,000 Revenues over (under) expenditures Beginning fund balance Ending fund balance 8,700 (41, 300) 46,324 46,324 55,024 5,024 Page 2 of 4 5/29/2018 P:\Finance\2018 Budget\Amendment #1\2018 05 29 2nd Reading\Budget Summary for Amended Funds.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA 2018 Budget Amendment SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS - continued #122 - WINTER WEATHER RESERVE FUND Revenues Investment Interest Transfer in - #001 Subtotal revenues Expenditures Snow removal expenses Total expenditures Revenues over (under) expenditures Beginning fund balance Ending fund balance CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS 2018 As Adopted Proposed Amendment As Amended 3,500 0 3,500 0 490,000 490,000 3,500 490,000 493,500 500,000 0 500,000 500,000 0 500,000 (496,500) 7,717 (6,500) 7,717 (488, 783) 1,217 #309 - PARKS CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND Revenues Grant Proceeds 1,693,200 0 1,693,200 Transfers in - #001 560,000 0 560,000 Transfers in - #103 0 50,000 50,000 Transfers in - #312 324,100 0 324,100 Investment Interest 0 0 0 Total revenues 2,577,300 50,000 2,627,300 Expenditures 227 Appleway Trail (Sullivan to Corbin) 1,853,300 233,000 2,086,300 268 Appleway Trail (Evergreen to Sullivan) 164,000 0 164,000 270 CenterPlace outdoor venue - Phase 1 200,000 0 200,000 Browns Park lighting and pathway 200,000 0 200,000 Park signs (Sullivan, Park Rd., Balfour) 24,000 0 24,000 Total expenditures 2,441,300 233,000 2,674,300 Revenues over (under) expenditures 136,000 (47,000) Beginning fund balance 126,202 126,202 Ending fund balance 262,202 79,202 Page 3 of 4 5/29/2018 P:\Finance\2018 Budget\Amendment #1\2018 05 29 2nd Reading\Budget Summary for Amended Funds.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA 2018 Budget Amendment CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS -continued #312 - CAPITAL RESERVE FUND Revenues Transfers in - #001 Transfers in - #313 Investment Interest Total revenues 2018 As Adopted Proposed Amendment As Amended 1,000,000 2,795,429 3,795,429 74,960 0 74,960 16,000 0 16,000 1,090,960 2,795,429 3,886,389 Expenditures Transfers out #303 (Euclid Ave - Flora to Barker) 5,000 0 5,000 Transfers out #303 (Indiana bus stops & crosswalk) 110,000 0 110,000 Transfers out #309 (Appleway Trail - Sullivan - Cort 301,900 0 301,900 Transfers out #309 (Appleway Trail - Evergreen -Sul 22,200 0 22,200 Total expenditures 439,100 0 439,100 Revenues over (under) expenditures Beginning fund balance Ending fund balance 651,860 4,427,286 3,447,289 4,427,286 5,079,146 7,874,575 Page 4 of 4 5/29/2018 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Full Time Equivalent Employees 2008 2009 2010 2011 Adopted 2012 I 2013 2018 2014 2015 2016 2017 Adopted Amend 5/22/2018 Difference from 2018 adopted to amended + (-) #001 - General Fund City Manager / City Clerk 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 7 7 0.000 City Attorney 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3.5 3.5 0.000 Deputy City Manager 8 8 8 7 7 6 6 6 6 6 3 3 0.000 Finance 9 10 12 11 11 10.75 11.75 11.75 11.75 11.75 11.75 11.75 0.000 Human Resources 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 0.000 Public Works 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 7 7.375 7.375 7.375 6.375 0 0 0.000 City Hall Operations & Maintenance 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0.000 CPW - Engineering 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 12.5 0.500 CPW - Economic Development 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6.375 6.375 0.000 CPW - Building and Planning 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 18 (1.000) CED - Administration 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 1 0 0 0.000 CED - Economic Development 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.5 2.65 4 0 0 0.000 CED - Development Services 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 11 10 0 0 0.000 CED - Engineering 8 8 8 6 6 8 7 0 0 0 0 0 0.000 CED - Planning 9 9 9 8.5 8.5 8 8 0 0 0 0 0 0.000 CED - Building 14.75 14.75 14.75 12.75 12.75 11.5 12.5 14 14 15 0 0 0.000 Parks &Rec - Admin 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 0.000 Parks & Rec - Recreation 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0.000 Parks & Rec - Senior Cntr 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0.000 Parks & Rec - CenterPlace 7 7 7 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 0.000 Total General Fund 80.25 81.25 83.25 74.75 74.75 72.25 73.625 73.625 73.775 74.125 74.625 74.125 -0.500 #101 - Street Fund 4.4 5 5 5 4.5 5 5.375 5.725 5.725 5.725 5.725 5.725 0.000 #303 - Street Capital Project Fund 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 4.5 5 0.500 #402 - Stormwater Fund 4 4 4 4 4.5 4.5 4.75 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.4 0.000 Total FTEs 92.15 93.75 95.75 87.25 87.25 85.25 87.25 87.25 87.4 87.75 89.25 89.25 0.000 Changes to FTEs for the 2018 Budget Amendment reflect the repurposing of a vacant position in the Building division to the Engineering division due to workflow needs. This position will be split half time between the General Fund and Street Capital Projects Fund #303, resulting in total FTEs in the General Fund decreasing by 0.5 and FTEs in Fund #303 increasing by 0.5. CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: May 29, 2017 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: nconsent n old business ® new business n public hearing n information n admin. report n pending legislation n executive session AGENDA TITLE: Motion Consideration: Appointment of Councilmember to the Continuum of Care Board GOVERNING LEGISLATION: The McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act as Amended by S.896 HEARTH Act of 2009. "The Homeless Emergency Assistance and Rapid Transition to Housing Act of 2009 (HEART Act), enacted into law on May 20, 2009, consolidates three of the separate homeless assistance programs administered by HUD under the McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act, into a single grant program. The HEART Act also codifies into law the Continuum of Care planning process, a longstanding part of HUD's application process to assist homeless persons by providing greater coordination in responding to their needs." https://www.hudexchange .info/programs/coc/toolkit/introduction-to-the-coc-program/#coc-program-law- regulations-and-notices PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: At the May 15, 2018, Council meeting, Mr. Patrick Stretch, Community Development Specialist with the Spokane County Community Services, Housing and Community Development Department; and Spokane Housing Authority Executive Director Pam Tietz, explained about the Continuum of Care for the Homeless, and invited a member of the Council to consider participation on that board. BACKGROUND: The Continuum of Care (CoC) for the Homeless, is a regional planning body that coordinates housing and services funding for homeless families and individuals. The CoC submits a single application for McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Grants to streamline the funding application process and encourage coordination of housing and services. This planning body encourages a more strategic approach to housing and services for those experiencing homelessness. OPTIONS: Move to confirm the appointment; do not confirm the appointment; or take other action deemed appropriate. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to confirm the Mayoral appointment of Councilmember Woodard to the Continuum of Care Board for a term beginning immediately upon appointment, and expiring December 31, 2018. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Possible funding opportunities. Spokane City/Spokane County Continuum of Care (CoC) allocates $3.7 million directly through HUD. An official link from the City of Spokane Valley Council allows for our direct impact. COUNCIL/STAFF CONTACT: Mayor Higgins ATTACHMENTS: none CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: May 29, 2018 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ['consent ❑ old business ® new business ['public hearing ['information ❑admin. report ['pending legislation ['executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Motion Consideration: Highland Estates Connector (Barker Road GSP) Interlocal Agreement with Spokane County GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 35.77.010, Perpetual Advanced Six -Year plans for coordinated transportation program expenditures. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: • May 7, 2013 — Administrative Report, Bridging the Valley • June 23, 2015 — Passed Resolution No. 17-011 adopting the 2016-2021 Six Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP), which included both the Barker Road and the Pines Road Grade Separation Projects (GSP) • April 5, 2016 — Admin Report for use of federal earmark funds • November 8, 2016 — Information Report on the status of the Barker GSP • November 15, 2016 — Administrative Report on the Barker GSP status • November 22, 2016 — Informational RCA • December 6, 2016 — Administrative Report • December 20, 2016 — Administrative Report • January 10, 2017 — Motion failed to contract with DEA for project design services • February 21, 2017 — Administrative Report • February 28, 2017 — Passed Resolution 17-006, amending the 2017 TIP • May 23, 2017 — Passed Resolution No. 17-011 adopting the 2018-2023 Six -Year TIP, which included the Grade Separation Project • August 22, 2017 — Passed motion to enter into a contract with DEA for the project's Phase 1 design • October 24, 2017 — Administrative Report to discuss alternatives • January 30, 2018 — Administrative Report to discuss alternatives with Council consensus to move the project forward with Alternative 5 • March 2, 2018 — Administrative Report to discuss alternatives • March 13, 2018 — Administrative Report to discuss history and alternatives • March 16, 2018 — Administrative Report for Council and Chamber of Commerce • March 27, 2018 — Passed motion to select preferred alternative for advancing project • April 10, 2018 — Passed motion to contract with DEA for the project's Phase 2 design BACKGROUND: The City previously received a federal earmark grant of $719,921 and a $1.5M state legislative appropriation for the Barker Road GSP. These grant funds can be used for the design, right -of way and construction phases of the project. The City has also received a grant from the Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Fund (FMSIB) for up to 20 percent of total project cost, not to exceed $10M, which can be used in the construction phase only. In October 2017, the City applied for the Transportation Investment Generating Economic Recovery (TIGER) grant. The City applied for the National Significant Freight and Highway Projects (INFRA) program in November 2017. In December 2017, the City was notified that it was awarded $6.0M from the National Highway Freight Program (NHFP). This award requires the state legislature to appropriate the funds in the 2019-2020 biennium. Additionally, the City has earmarked $3.6 million in real estate excise tax and capital reserve fund monies for this project. The City must advertise bids no later than September of 2020 to qualify for the NHFP funds. In March 2018, the City was notified that it was awarded $9,020,149 from the TIGER 2017 program. In the first phase of the project, David Evans and Associates (DEA), the Consultant, analyzed and compared six alternatives in terms of cost, right-of-way needs, impacts to existing properties, constructability, safety, and other pertinent project elements, so the City could select the preferred alternative. The alternatives evaluation identified Alternative 5 as the preferred alternative. On March 27, 2018, Council passed a motion selecting Alternative 5 and advancing the project to full design which will be completed in the second phase of the project. Alternative 5 consists of a three legged roundabout at the intersection of Trent Avenue and Barker Road. Spokane County is interested in evaluating the feasibility of a northerly fourth leg for the roundabout that would provide access to the Highland Estates subdivision. Spokane County desires to enter into an Interlocal Agreement (attached) with the City so this connection can be evaluated using the City's consultant, DEA. The Interlocal Agreement provides the City reimbursement for costs associated with this fourth leg, the Highland Estates connector, evaluation effort. The level of design will be determined by Spokane County. OPTIONS: Discussion only. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to authorize the City Manager to finalize and execute the Interlocal agreement with Spokane County for the reimbursement of costs associated with evaluating the feasibility of the Highland Estates Connector. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: None. STAFF CONTACT: Bill Helbig, City Engineer ATTACHMENTS: Interlocal Agreement — County Executed RESOLUTION NO.1 8 0373 BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON IN THE MATTER OF EXECUTING AN INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY AND SPOKANE COUNTY TO ALLOW THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY TO PROVIDE ENGINEERING DESIGN SERVICES FOR SPOKANE COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS RESOLUTION WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of RCW 36.32.120(6), the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington, (`the Board') has the care of county property and the management of county funds and business; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 39.34 RCW, Chapter 35.77 RCW, and Chapter 47.24 RCW, the City of Spokane Valley ('the City') and Spokane County (`the County') may enter into a cooperative Interlocal Agreement wherein the City can perform engineering design services for the County as mutually agreed upon; and WHEREAS, the CITY is the project sponsor for the proposed Barker Road/BNSF Grade Separation Project (BARKER PROJECT); and WHEREAS, the BARKER PROJECT necessitates a new three legged roundabout for the Barker Road and Trent Avenue (State Route 290) intersection; and WHEREAS, the proposed BARKER PROJECT is located within the CITY limits and unincorporated County jurisdiction; and WHEREAS, the COUNTY is interested in the feasibility of providing a new county road (CONNECTION) to the Highland Estates subdivision from the proposed BARKER PROJECT's roundabout; and WHEREAS, the COUNTY is willing to pay the CITY for the engineering design services for the CONNECTION; and WHEREAS, the County, pursuant to RCW 35.77.020, by resolution of the Board must approve the cooperative agreement between the City of Spokane Valley and the County; and WHEREAS, the Spokane County Engineer recommends the approval of this Interlocal Agreement as it is in the best interest of the public; and WHEREAS, the Board feels that the best interests of the public will be served by entering into said agreement with the City of Spokane Valley. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Board that the Interlocal Agreement between the City of Spokane Valley and the County for the City to provide engineering and design services is approved. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board that the Interlocal Agreement between the City of Spokane Valley and the County may be executed by the Chair, or a majority of the Board, at other than an open meeting and any addendum to said agreement may be executed by the Spokane County Engineer. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 22nd day of May, 2018. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON ATTEST: © COM SIS caG��a�SI* By Josh, Kerns, Chair Mary Kuney, ice -Chair Ginna Vasquez, Clerk of the Board Al French, ommissioner INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT ENGINEERING DESIGN SERVICES CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY AND SPOKANE COUNTY This Interlocal Agreement (AGREEMENT) for Design Services is made and entered into by and between the CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY (CITY), a municipal corporation within the State of Washington, having offices for the transaction of business at 10210 East Sprague Avenue, Spokane Valley, WA 99206 and SPOKANE COUNTY (COUNTY), a political subdivision of the State of Washington, having offices for the transaction of business at 1116 West Broadway Avenue, Spokane WA 99260. Together, the CITY and the COUNTY are referred to as the PARTIES. WHEREAS, the PARTIES enter into this AGREEMENT pursuant to chapter 39.34 RCW (Interlocal Cooperation Act), chapter 35.77 RCW (Streets — Planning, Establishment, Construction, and Maintenance), and chapter 47.24 RCW (City Streets as Part of State Highways). WHEREAS, the CITY is the project sponsor for the proposed Barker Road/BNSF Grade Separation Project (BARKER PROJECT); and WHEREAS, the BARKER PROJECT necessitates a new three legged roundabout for the Barker Road and Trent Avenue (State Route 290) intersection; and WHEREAS, the proposed BARKER PROJECT is located within the CITY limits and unincorporated County jurisdiction; and WHEREAS, the COUNTY is interested in the feasibility of providing a new county road (CONNECTION) to the Highland Estates subdivision from the proposed BARKER PROJECT's roundabout; and WHEREAS, the COUNTY is willing to pay the CITY for the engineering design services for the CONNECTION; and NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the terms and conditions set forth herein, it is agreed among the CITY and COUNTY as follows: ARTICLE 1 -RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CITY 1.1. The CITY shall provide the engineering design services for the CONNECTION. 1.2. The CITY shall take the engineering design services to a design level determined under Article 2.1. Environmental permitting and documentation, and right-of-way services are not considered as part of the engineering design services. 1.3. The CITY shall provide to the COUNTY all design files, calculations, memorandums, reports, and associated design information or files related to the engineering design of the CONNECTION. 1.4. The CITY shall submit to the COUNTY, on a regular basis, a bill requesting reimbursement for the costs associated with the engineering design services for the CONNECTION. ARTICLE 2 -RESPONSIBILITY OF THE COUNTY 2.1. The COUNTY shall determine the scope of the engineering design services. 2.2. The COUNTY shall coordinate with the CITY to determine the schedule and fee for the engineering design services provided by the CITY's consultant. 2.3. The COUNTY shall reimburse the CITY for the actual cost of completing the engineering design services which will include the full direct and indirect cost of all engineering design services including costs incurred by the CITY for the work. 2.4. Within 30 days of receiving reimbursement request, the COUNTY shall pay to the CITY the full amount of said reimbursement request. ARTICLE 3 -GENERAL PROVISIONS 3.1. Amendment: This AGREEMENT may be amended or modified only by the mutual agreement of the PARTIES. Such amendments or modifications shall not be binding unless they are in writing and signed by persons authorized to bind each of the PARTIES. 3.2. Term of AGREEMENT: This AGREEMENT will terminate upon completion of the scope of work pursuant to Article 2.1. The PARTIES may extend the term of this AGREEMENT by mutually executing an amendment which specifies a new termination date. 3.3. Termination of AGREEMENT: This Agreement may be terminated at any time by mutual written consent of the COUNTY and the CITY. If this AGREEMENT is terminated pursuant to this section, the CITY shall continue performing services through the date of termination. The COUNTY shall compensate the CITY for all services performed by the CITY through the date of termination. The COUNTY obligation to make such final payment to the CITY shall survive the termination of this AGREEMENT. If this AGREEMENT, including any addendum, is terminated prior to the fulfillment of the terms of this AGREEMENT or addendum, the COUNTY agrees to reimburse the CITY for the actual costs, both direct and indirect, it has incurred for the work up to the date of termination, as well as the actual costs, both direct and indirect, for those products or services which were obligated prior to the date of termination and are non -cancelable. Any termination of this AGREEMENT or an addendum shall not prejudice any rights or obligations accrued to the PARTIES prior to termination. 3.4. Independent Contractor: The CITY shall be deemed an independent contractor for all purposes, and the employees of the CITY or any of its contractors, subcontractors, consultants, and the employees thereof, shall not in any manner be deemed to be employees of the COUNTY. City of Spokane Valley / Spokane County Interlocal Agreement for Engineering Design Services Page 2 of 5 3.5. Indemnification: The COUNTY shall defend, indemnify, and hold the CITY, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers harmless from any and all claims, injuries, damages, losses, or suits including attorney fees arising out of or in connection with the performance of this AGREEMENT or an addendum, except for injuries and damages caused by the sole negligence of the CITY. Should a court of competent jurisdiction determine that this AGREEMENT or an addendum is subject to RCW 4.24.115, then in the event of liability for damages arising out of bodily injury to persons or damages to property caused by or resulting from the concurrent negligence of the COUNTY and the CITY, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers, the COUNTY'S liability hereunder shall be only to the extent of the COUNTY'S negligence. It is further specifically and expressly understood that the indemnification provided herein constitutes the COUNTY'S waiver of immunity under Title 51 RCW (Industrial Insurance) solely for the purposes of this indemnification. This waiver has been mutually negotiated by the PARTIES. 3.6. Disputes: In the event that a dispute arises under this AGREEMENT or an addendum, it shall be resolved as follows. 3.6.1. The CITY and the COUNTY shall each appoint a member to a disputes board. Those two members shall select a third board member not affiliated with either Party. The three member board shall conduct a dispute resolution hearing that shall be informal and unrecorded. An attempt at such dispute resolution in compliance with aforesaid process shall be a prerequisite to the filing of any litigation concerning the dispute. 3.6.2. The PARTIES shall equally share in the cost of the third disputes board member; however, each Party shall be responsible for its own costs and fees. 3.7. Venue: If either Party deems it necessary to institute legal action or proceedings to enforce any right or obligation under this AGREEMENT or an addendum, the PARTIES agree that any such action or proceedings shall be brought in Spokane County Superior Court. Further, the PARTIES agree that each will be solely responsible for payment of its own attorney's fees, witness fees, and costs. 3.8. Audits/Records: All records for the completed PROJECT, in support of all costs incurred, both direct and indirect, shall be maintained by the CITY for a period of six (6) years. The COUNTY shall have full access to and right to examine said records, during normal business hours, and as often as it deems necessary. Should the COUNTY require copies of any records, it agrees to pay the costs thereof. The PARTIES agree that the work performed herein or under an addendum is subject to audit by either or both PARTIES and/or their designated representatives, and/or State of Washington and/or the federal government. 3.9. All Writings Contained Herein/Binding Effect: This AGREEMENT, along with an adopted addendum, contains the terms and conditions agreed upon by the CITY and COUNTY. The CITY and COUNTY agree that there are no other understandings, oral or otherwise, regarding the subject matter of this AGREEMENT. No changes or additions to this AGREEMENT shall be valid or binding upon the CITY or COUNTY unless such change or addition is in writing and mutually executed by the PARTIES. City of Spokane Valley / Spokane County Interlocal Agreement for Engineering Design Services Page 3 of 5 3.10. Interpretation: This AGREEMENT has been and shall be construed as having been made and delivered within the State of Washington and it is mutually understood and agreed by each Party that this AGREEMENT shall be governed by the laws of the State of Washington both as to interpretation and performance. Each Party consents to the personal jurisdiction of the Spokane County Superior Court of the State of Washington for all claims, disputes, proceedings, or actions in any way arising under, or relating to, this AGREEMENT or an addendum. 3.11. Severability: The PARTIES agree that if any parts, terms, or provisions of this AGREEMENT or an addendum are held by the courts to be illegal, the validity of the remaining portions or provisions shall not be affected and the rights and obligations of the PARTIES shall not be affected regarding the remainder of the AGREEMENT or an addendum. If it should appear that any part, term, or provision of this AGREEMENT or an addendum conflicts with any statutory provision of the State of Washington, then the part, term, or provision thereof that may be in conflict shall be deemed inoperative and null and void insofar as it may be in conflict therewith and this AGREEMENT or an addendum shall be deemed to be modified to conform to such statutory provision. 3.12. Headings: The section headings appearing in this AGREEMENT or an addendum have been inserted solely for convenience and ready reference. In no way do they purport to, and shall not be deemed to define, limit, or extend the scope or intent of the sections to which they pertain. 3.13. No Third -Party Beneficiaries: Nothing in this AGREEMENT is intended to give, or shall give, whether directly or indirectly, any benefit or right, greater than that enjoyed by the general public, to third persons. ARTICLE 4- RCW 39.34 REQUIRED CLAUSES 4.1. Purpose: Authorize the CITY to provide to the COUNTY engineering design services for the northern leg (CONNECTION) of the roundabout at Barker Road and Trent Avenue (SR 290), (BARKER PROJECT). The CITY has hired an engineering consultant to prepare the design of the BARKER PROJECT. The COUNTY will coordinate with the CITY to determine the final scope, schedule, and fee for these services. 4.2. Organization of Separate Entity and Its Powers: No new or separate legal or administrative entity is created to administer the provisions of this AGREEMENT or any addendum. 4.3. Duration: See Article 3.2 Term of AGREEMENT. 4.4. Termination: See Article 3.3 Termination of AGREEMENT. 4.5. Property Upon Termination: See Article 1.4. 4.6. Responsibilities of the PARTIES: See various provisions throughout this AGREEMENT. City of Spokane Valley / Spokane County Interlocal Agreement for Engineering Design Services Page 4 of 5 4.7. AGREEMENT to be Filed: The COUNTY shall file this AGREEMENT or any amendment with the County Auditor or, in the alternative, place the AGREEMENT or any amendment on the COUNTY'S website or other electronically retrievable public source. 4.8. Representatives: The PARTIES hereby appoint the following individuals as their respective representatives for administering the terms of this AGREEMENT or any addendum. City of Spokane Valley William S. Helbig, PE City Engineer City of Spokane Valley 10210 East Sprague Avenue Spokane, WA 99206 509-720-5320 bhelbig@spokanCV alley.org Spokane County Chad W. Coles, P.E. Spokane County Engineer Spokane County Public Works 1026 West Broadway Avenue Spokane, WA 99260-0170 509-477-3600 ccoles ct spokanecounty.org The PARTIES warrant that the officers executing below have been duly authorized to act for and on behalf of the Party for purposes of confirming this AGREEMENT. This AGREEMENT between the PARTIES is entered into this 2 240t day of I'vl a �•� In witness, whereof, the PARTIES hereto below have executed this AGREEMENT. City of Spokane Valley Signature: Mark Calhoun City Manager Date: Spokane County . 2018 Signature: '' -- ---- Josh Kerns 18 0 3 y 3 Chair, Board of Spokane County Commissioners Date: 5 .22.18 City of Spokane Valley / Spokane County Interlocal Agreement for Engineering Design Services Page 5 of 5 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: May 29, 2018 Department Director Approval Check all that apply: ['consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ['public hearing ❑ information ® admin. report ['pending legislation ['executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Spokane Airport Projects GOVERNING LEGISLATION: N/A PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: None BACKGROUND: CEO Larry Krauter of Spokane Airports will provide Council with an overview of Spokane Airport projects. OPTIONS: Discussion only. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: N/A BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: N/A STAFF CONTACT: Mark Calhoun ATTACHMENTS: Powerpoint Welcome to Felts Field! May 7, 2018 SISpokane International Airport GEG - GENERATING ECONOMIC GROWTH Felts Field Spokane International Airport GEG - GENERATING ECONOMIC GROWTH Felts Field 3 s, Spokane International Airport GEG - GENERATING ECONOMIC GROWTH Felts Field SPOKANE RIVER UPRIVER HYDROELECTRIC & WATER WORKS FACILI POLICE 4CADEM` 4 s, GEG - GENERATING ECONOMIC GROWTH Spokane International Airport Felts Field EAGLE SPOKANE HELICOPTERS COMMUNITY COLLEGE 5 1 EDMO AVIONICS DISTRIBUTORS SPOKANE TURBINE CENTER s, GEG - GENERATING ECONOMIC GROWTH Spokane International Airport Felts Field EAA, CH 79 AVIATION (FBO) TERMINAL BLDG., SKYWAY CAFE, PILOT'S LOUNGE VALLEYFORD PROPERTIES 6 EAGLE HELICOPTERS LIFE FLIGHT 91 Spokane International Airport GEG - GENERATING ECONOMIC GROWTH Felts Field LIFE FLIGHT AIRPORT SREB 7 MOODY AVIATION 91 Spokane International Airport GEG - GENERATING ECONOMIC GROWTH Recent Improvements 8 SISpokane International Airport GEG - GENERATING ECONOMIC GROWTH Felts Field Recent Improvements 9 SISpokane International Airport GEG - GENERATING ECONOMIC GROWTH Felts Field Ramp Project SISpokane International Airport GEG - GENERATING ECONOMIC GROWTH Felts Field Taxiways & Taxilanes Project 11 Felts Field Turf Runway Project 12 { Upcoming Improvements 13 Spokane International Airport GEG - GENERATING ECONOMIC GROWTH Felts Field Fuel Facility Relocation 14 91 Spokane International Airport GEG - GENERATING ECONOMIC GROWTH Felts Field Fuel Facility Relocation II1LRKAiIGKI[L �IRPQICI Felts Field Master Plan 16 ISSpokane International Airport GEG - GENERATING ECONOMIC GROWTH Felts Field Master Plan • AMP/ALP May 2005 • ALP Update December 2010 17 S. Spokane International Airport GEG - GENERATING ECONOMIC GROWTH Felts Field Master Plan 18 91 Spokane International Airport GEG - GENERATING ECONOMIC GROWTH Felts Field Master Plan Existing ATCT Light of Sight Penetration 19 91 Spokane International Airport GEG - GENERATING ECONOMIC GROWTH Felts Field Master Plan 20 Sil GEG - GENERATING ECONOMIC GROWTH Spokane International Airport Felts Field Master Plan Update 21 SISpokane International Airport GEG - GENERATING ECONOMIC GROWTH Felts Field Historic District Gateway Study 22 Spokane International Airport GEG - GENERATING ECONOMIC GROWTH Felts Field Historic District Gateway Study 23 5 Spokane International Airport GEG - GENERATING ECONOMIC GROWTH SPOKANE 24 Spokane International Airport GEG - GENERATING ECONOMIC GROWTH 25 Spokane International Airport GEG - GENERATING ECONOMIC GROWTH Felts Field Historic District Gateway Study Felts Field Historic District Gateway Study PAR,. • „..••••• •- ;;VCAZ7.4*,.1.41' ;. _641-1610_1irsfir--f* E PANORR.Off PAR, y AVE 1 --If 4.4en erxee PARIrATER.3 .Tterr4e" 71.7: " :4firpt, 76' ally" prss Oor I! ,,, TRENT AVE. wk. • 411D 27 SISpokane International Airport GEG — GENERATING ECONOMIC GROWTH Felts Field Historic District Gateway Study Coen P•re,T/APP4AL At gALAA...Myr 7.. ArAt Nr .AY REFHa ,ve 6RlENTIN - PARK/Ne _ APA,NrMN N23RtF94/Ea4e99 (7-1 0." • -,—w: rtMTTER Ayr efOR6A6Pr INTO rtrt A N. mAYPe PPS tl P 'C_ LAN096APr ImP.ROV,M1sNT®. frTSNTIhh P PPORTENITY O TREET46APF LANn9oMINa- ov ("ao so, NARR6W PEPe4TRAIN/P/Kr 6411N0✓14 PppoftTbNKY T6 /5P7.15( PEPE*TRJAN eAPe-/), - UNION PACIFIC RAiLROAO Opr5RTMNIrY 1-6 /Ne6rtP6n0re 4rrtrer ALONr. 7 rrert Ave eel -We -EN rye SPOR*VeCrAtri, ANo eons oP pAveArrxr PVERNeAO Pc*eA 1-,NE4 REPTRJOT TAU 4Ke 1 28 ILEGEND WATS FENCE .5.14/16.11011 1 OPPORTUNITIES AND CONSTRAINTS 5 PINER Ca. nE0 CVO Spokane IM Nnatiana l Avyt -ffln fiflD- FELTS FIELD GATEWAY STUDY ge, Spokane International Airport GEG — GENERATING ECONOMIC GROWTH Felts Field Historic District Gateway Study P/TEWT/AF TP PRIVIDE AoNENt {-I®NtIN® To NIETlAm PEA'roAm NFETOAIN LMC wool OAPs O PPORT/NITY Td IAIPRNE metAwMO AMAM-r/6t PY EXPANPIMB PO*NPArrON PPAN706e. PORAIA/-FY PREKNT THE - ERAVNAI YAl/-0YNP WPre APPROPA(Arl MAIVA., eXPeNeW1t .—Aol-POM peEP PLAN POLE WESTERN 3' RUTTER AVE. a I QAE -Q 3 t'• pN6/NTROLGro &mom _ LAEArE4 FOTeM-o1AL Ta, ahPETY IC.... OPPORrOVIrlte TO MAAROM- NEINPOROE IN6AEbb/E6RE%9 IN6Aeeele6rteee INoloPNv6APYNB ANP PPINre atANMA.P.dN6 nNVellAY W.4-ANy1NAPIN® ANO v,,,l,-reNANT sIBNA.R OW y --- 1 - FIg ,_� rtorr eA A j I 0 0 0 Of7D7:5 0 0 0 - CD, t 4 V SQ UNION. PACIFIC RAILROAD OPPOrtmA,Ay r4 PNOloom ___r Z S�oAMAK AKR/11- APPROPA,re ARANO, �/ rAPERIEN6e AONpotvh- aIaNA6e 6Q. SPOKANE COUNTY -OPPOArg#trY TO /NOORP/RATE erRerr rrtre. Al -ON& RHTTER AVE EY ArPpdpNN NNl#NTAOFLEP Room* POIN-rv5. CPPORT AKY TO INeORPORRre 4TAEer, "Am* AYONa AprrEA 11,.. EETWEEN ,- NERNEAP POWER ANP EvaE OP PAV7EEN-7 29 -=II£GEND rflrI'fi*' OPPORTUNITES AND CONSTRAINTS MYER EAMENTIVACATION RC. CDPIA POWER Far • FIRE WO., CURB Spokane International Airport 1111flflD= FELTS FIELD GATEWAY STUDY Spokane International Airport GEG — GENERATING ECONOMIC GROWTH Felts Field Historic District Gateway Study Felts Field Site Plan Concept -1 1 Scale: N.T.S. 30 91 Spokane International Airport GEG — GENERATING ECONOMIC GROWTH al I 'aA�I '�/1ilii/k;r 16 r11 .x4LIMr,or 151 lista_ Srdus 31 Spokane International Airport GEG - GENERATING ECONOMIC GROWTH 8r 22/ 32 SISpokane International Airport GEG - GENERATING ECONOMIC GROWTH 7fGV Ilp eitirrey 52. PcNr/4r6 tIkv 33 Spokane International Airport GEG - GENERATING ECONOMIC GROWTH SITE -Exterior Project IC, Vehicular Getaway' E03 Project ID, Pedestrian Gateway 1E04 4 Park© 4 Valet Vehicular Directional, SecondaryI EU7 Pedestrian Map 1E05 Scale: l(d"=1"-0" Project ID, Vehicular Getaway - Secondary 1 [03.1 Vehicular Directional, MajorlPrinrary 1E06 Scale'. 4 Park® 4 Hotel 4 Valet Pedestrian Directional, Freestanding j E09 Pedestrian Directory, Freestanding 1E12 34 SISpokane International Airport GEG — GENERATING ECONOMIC GROWTH F NM SW 35 Spokane International Airport GEG - GENERATING ECONOMIC GROWTH 36 s, Spokane International Airport GEG - GENERATING ECONOMIC GROWTH 37 SISpokane International Airport GEG - GENERATING ECONOMIC GROWTH 38 Spokane International Airport GEG - GENERATING ECONOMIC GROWTH 39 91 Spokane International Airport GEG - GENERATING ECONOMIC GROWTH 40 91 Spokane International Airport GEG - GENERATING ECONOMIC GROWTH 41 Spokane International Airport GEG - GENERATING ECONOMIC GROWTH Felts Field 42 91 Spokane International Airport GEG - GENERATING ECONOMIC GROWTH Spokane International Airport GEG - GENERATING ECONOMIC GROWTH CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: May 29, 2018 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ['consent ❑ old business ['new business ['public hearing ❑ information ® admin. report ['pending legislation ['executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Administrative report — art in public spaces. GOVERNING LEGISLATION: Chapter 3.34 SVMC — Acceptance of donations and gifts; chapter 3.46 SVMC — Non -architectural and engineering services. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Over the years, the Spokane Valley Arts Council has donated a number of sculptures to the City for public display. BACKGROUND: The Spokane Valley Arts Council (SVAC) is a not-for-profit 501(c)(3) organization formed in 2004 for the stated purpose of working "with local businesses, civic leaders and artists to cooperatively conceive, develop and implement art -related programs and cultural activities." The SVAC has been instrumental in identifying projects to be constructed and located on property owned by the City for the cultural benefit of our citizens. Examples of their efforts include projects at CenterPlace ("Working the Line" by Jerry McKellar, "Dance of Sun and Moon" by Jerry McKellar) and City Hall ("Coup Ponies" by Jerry McKellar, "Berry Picker" by Nancy McLaughlin, and "Woman and Horse" by Ace Powell). These earlier projects occurred prior to adoption of the City's donation/gift acceptance provisions in the Spokane Valley Municipal Code. These new provisions require a process that includes an objective analysis of the proposed donation, including related costs that will result from acceptance of the donation. Pursuant to SVMC 3.34.030(A)(2), the City Manager may accept or decline any nonmonetary donation. In making this determination, the City Manager shall consider the potential practical use the City would make of the donation. The City Manager may seek input from the Council when accepting the donation would require expenditure of City funds for storage, maintenance, upkeep, repair, or similar costs. This will be a current issue in the very near future for the City as we have just learned that the SVAC is nearing completion of its latest project, titled "Heart of the Valley" by Richard Warrington. To date, the City has not received any firm information from the SVAC regarding the size of the new sculpture being constructed, which will be important in identifying appropriate potential sites for placement of the piece. Also of importance for the City is that it has not budgeted any funds for this project. This has generated additional internal discussion between staff of the need for adopting a more formal process for identifying - at the front end - the theme and size of each proposed piece in the future. The City has limited public spaces where sculptures may be placed, so advanced planning is critical. Based on staff discussions, we believe that we need to consider at least the following issues for future pieces: - Mutual agreement between the City and SVAC to select a specific piece before any commitment is made to construct. This discussion may include what the theme of the sculpture will be; - A determination by the City on a location for the piece prior to construction. Extensive time, effort, and expense goes into each unique piece, and appropriate time and consideration should be used to identify where each will fit from a spatial standpoint, and where each piece will best represent the artist's vision in designing it; and - An assessment by the City of the anticipated costs for placement and maintenance. Staff suggests that the Council and SVAC should consider whether to enter into an agreement that captures the various aspects of the long-term relationship between the SVAC and the City. These topics may include discussion about addressing the selection of projects, advanced budgeting for expenses the City agrees to assume, and future use of City facilities for fundraising efforts. In the City's early years, the SVAC combined its fundraising efforts with when Valleyfest was held at Mirabeau Park/CenterPlace. As such, it was considered part of Valleyfest, and the City did not charge separately to use CenterPlace. In recent years, the fundraising event has become a separate event earlier in the year. The agreement could acknowledge that use and consider it as part of the consideration to SVAC in partial exchange for the sculptures donated to the City. This discussion raises an additional issue that the City Council previously discussed relating to adoption of an art master plan. The City applied for grant funds in order to contract for this function, but did not receive the grant. At Council's direction, staff can bring back potential funding options for creating an arts master plan. This type of plan would identify long term goals for the City relating to what types of art the City would like to focus on, where it could be located, and how it would be funded. In the short term, staff will bring back information for Council consideration regarding an assessment of the anticipated costs to permanently locate the "Heart of the Valley" so the Council and City Manager may consider whether to accept the proposed donation. This discussion will also include some potential sites where a sculpture of this theme and size may be located. Staff will then look for Council discussion and input to the City Manager regarding whether to accept the donation. OPTIONS: (1) Council discussion on the issues raised; or (2) take other action as appropriate. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: NA. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Unknown at this time. STAFF CONTACT: Mike Stone, Parks and Recreation Director; Cary Driskell, City Attorney ATTACHMENTS: PowerPoint slides Art in Public Spaces — Administrative report Cary Driskell, City Attorney Mike Stone, Parks and Recreation Director May 29, 2018 City of Spokane Valley - Office of the City Attorney r Long Term, Valued Relationship with Spokane Valley Arts Council The Spokane Valley Arts Council (SNAG) was formed in 2004, is separate from the City, and is a non -for-profit 5oi(C)(3) entity. The SVAC has traditionally conducted fund-raising efforts to get some of the money necessary to fund the purchase of public art in Spokane Valley. These funds have been used to purchase a number of sculptures which are publicly displayed in the City. City of Spokane Valley - Office of the City Attorney Donated Sculptures - CenterPlace "Working the Line" By Jerry McKellar "Dance of the Sun and Moon" By Jerry McKellar City of Spokane Valley - Office of the City Attorney Donated Sculptures —City Hall "Berry Picker" "Woman and Horse" "Coup Ponies" By Nancy McLaughlin By Ace Powell City of Spokane Valley - Office of the City Attorney By Jerry McKellar 4 New Sculpture Nearly Complete The SVAC has apparently nearly completed a new project. The City has not received any specific information on when the project is anticipated to be completed, how large it is, or a location where such a sculpture may fit from the standpoint of size and theme. City of Spokane Valley - Office of the City Attorney Richard Warrington, Heart of The Valley 5 SVMC 3.34 —Acceptance of Donations and Gifts The prior sculptures were all donated to the City prior to adoption of chapter 3.34 SVMC relating to acceptance of donations and gifts. These Code provisions require a process -based analysis of proposed donations to the City to determine need by the City, and what any attendant costs for the City would be in accepting a donation. The City has not had an opportunity to engage in that process to date, but looks forward to doing so with the SVAC regarding "Heart of the Valley." City of Spokane Valley - Office of the City Attorney Acceptance of "Heart of the Valley" Staff will come back in the very near future to present the analysis to Council on costs to the City to accept this sculpture. As part of this, staff will need to know the sculpture's size, which will determine: • How much land would be necessary to accommodate such a piece; • What type of base material will be necessary to support it; Whether the piece will require lighting; and Whether the theme of the sculpture dictates locating or not locating it in specific areas. The City has not budgeted for any of these costs because it did not have this information during last year's budgeting process. City of Spokane Valley - Office of the City Attorney Other Issues for Consideration The City has had a long term relationship with the SVAC, dating to 2004 involving various facets. Staff believes it would be beneficial for both the City and the SVAC to consider entering into an agreement encompassing these components in order to provide more predictability for both parties. Potential discussion points could include: Identifying ways the City can provide meaningful input on sculpture decisions; • Establishing timeframes for notification to City for budgeting purposes; • Clarifying how SVAC use of CenterPlace for fundraising will occur; City of Spokane Valley - Office of the City Attorney Public Arts Master Plan The City has discussed the possibility of drafting and adopting a master plan to guide the Council in issues relating to public art in the City. Staff applied for a grant in 2017 in an effort to get this off the ground, but was unsuccessful. Staff is seeking input from Council as to whether it wants staff to continue seeking a grant to draft a Public Arts Master Plan. This type of Plan could develop a list of suitable locations for public art, and could include preferred themes and genres for sculptures, providing more predictability for the City and the SVAC. Council direction? City of Spokane Valley - Office of the City Attorney CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: May 29, 2018 Check all that apply: ['consent ❑ old business ['information ® admin. report Department Director Approval: ['new business ['public hearing ['pending legislation ['executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Street O&M Fund #101 — Level of Service and Financial Challenges GOVERNING LEGISLATION: Transportation Benefit Districts — RCW 35.21.225, RCW 36.73, and RCW 36.74 Banked Property Tax Capacity — RCW 84.55.092 Levy Lid Lift — RCW 84.55.050 Utility Taxes — RCW 35A.82.020, RCW 35.21.865, and RCW 35.21.870; SVMC 3.70.140 PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Council has had various discussions regarding funding deficits and needs in the Street O&M Fund #101 dating back to incorporation. Since 2016, the following Council discussions on this topic have occurred: • 2016 — Multiple discussions on transportation and infrastructure funding for the City, including discussion of a proposed utility tax (which did not move forward). • 2017 — Staff re-evaluated the condition of the streets and worked on revising estimates of funding needs for the City's transportation and infrastructure program. • 2018 — Council authorized a $1.4 million City fee as part of the new solid waste collection contract in order to help fund pavement preservation efforts, and Council discussed deficits and needs in transportation and infrastructure programs at the February 13, 2018 Workshop. BACKGROUND: Since 2004, Council has had periodic discussions regarding the need and potential options for funding current and projected future deficits in the City's transportation and infrastructure programs, particularly related to the Street O&M Fund #101. In 2004 a proposed utility tax ordinance was introduced in response to projected deficits in the City's Street O&M Fund #101, but Council ultimately decided not to have a second reading of that ordinance. The discussion was postponed for a few years due to the City receiving more in both property taxes and sales taxes than was originally anticipated in the first few years of incorporation. However, in 2008 the City was once again faced with annual deficits of approximately $2.1 million in the Street O&M Fund #101, and Council was confronted with the choice of either increasing revenues or reducing street maintenance activities in order to reduce costs. The decision was made to increase revenues through a 6% telephone utility tax through passage of Ordinance 08-014 in August 2008. The telephone utility tax generated $3.05 million during 2009 in its first year of implementation, which served the purpose of eliminating the deficit in the Street O&M Fund #101 at that time. However, between 2009 and 2017 the City has seen an annual average decrease of 5.18% in telephone utility tax collections. In 2017, the City collected $176,403 or 8.52% less in telephone utility taxes than it did during 2016 (see Attachment #1), and preliminary estimates for collections are $1.7 million for the 2019 Budget. This represents an overall reduction of nearly $1.2 million in revenues since the tax's inception in 2009 while at the same time we have continued to see an increase in the cost of service contracts and materials throughout the same time period. Declining revenues in the Street O&M Fund #101 have once again placed the City in the position of looking at options on how to fund current and projected future deficits in this Fund. Street O&M Fund #101: The City's transportation and infrastructure programs are operated out of several different City Funds. The Street O&M Fund #101 generally accounts for the operations and maintenance of City streets. Maintenance work in Fund #101 includes street pavement repairs, traffic signals and signs, landscaping and vegetation control, snow and ice control, and many other street maintenance and repair activities. The main revenue sources for Fund #101 are motor vehicle fuel taxes and multimodal transportation revenues, which are passed through to the City from the State, as well as the City's telephone utility tax which is imposed by the City under SVMC Chapter 3.70 at a rate of 6%. As noted above, the City has continued to see a decline in the annual amount of telephone utility taxes collected. The budget for the Street Fund in the past several years has reflected cost cutting measures in order to keep recurring expenditures from exceeding projected recurring revenues to the extent possible. Attachment #2 depicts three years of actual activity for the Street Fund, the initial and adopted 2018 Budget, the preliminary 2019 Budget, and projected activity from 2020 through 2023. The assumptions used in the projection are as follows: • We assumed that the telephone utility tax would not be eliminated and that it would continue to decrease at the average annual rate of 5.18%. • The dollar amount of the projected alternate revenue stream is the amount necessary for estimated recurring revenues to break even with recurring expenditures. • We assumed an increase of 2% annually for most expenditures as a reasonable measure of anticipated inflation. • The Street Fund is assumed to have no contributions to the General Fund #001 nor the Pavement Preservation Fund #311 from 2019 forward. Using these assumptions, we have calculated the alternate revenue stream would need to generate approximately $1.3 million in 2020 in addition to estimated collections of the telephone utility tax. As the telephone utility tax continues to decline, we calculate the alternate revenue stream would need to generate approximately $1.8 million by 2023. Projected (in millions) 2020 2021 2022 2023 Projected Funding Needs: Street Fund #101 $ 1.3 $ 1.4 $ 1.6 $ 1.8 We anticipate the revenue stream referenced above will be required each year beyond 2023 if the City wishes to maintain streets at this level of service. If the City does not wish to implement an alternate revenue source, then the estimated amounts above would be the dollar amounts that would need to be eliminated from the Street O&M Fund #101 existing services. Alternate Revenue Options: If it so chooses, the City has several revenue options available that may be used for Street O&M purposes. These include a transportation benefit district, property tax banked capacity, a levy lid lift, and utility taxes. Transportation Benefit District: A city or county may form a transportation benefit district (TBD) by ordinance, following a public hearing. The ordinance must include the boundaries of the TBD and a description of the transportation improvements that will be funded by it. The boundaries may include all or part of the city or county that is establishing the TBD, and the boundaries may include all or part of another jurisdiction (i.e. another city or county) through an interlocal agreement. Once the TBD is formed, it is a quasi -municipal organization that is a separate legal entity from the establishing jurisdiction with independent taxing authority. If the TBD shares the same boundaries as the establishing jurisdiction, it must be governed by the members of that jurisdiction's legislative body acting as the governing board for the TBD as a separate legal entity and holding separate and distinct meetings. In 2015, the Legislature adopted legislation authorizing the establishing jurisdiction (i.e., the city) to assume the rights, powers, functions, and obligations of the TBD if the TBD shared the same boundaries as the establishing jurisdiction. In the event a city or county "assumes" the TBD, the TBD ceases to be a separate legal entity and the legislative body may hear TBD issues at their normally scheduled meetings. If the boundaries of the TBD include multiple jurisdictions, it must be governed by a separate governing board pursuant to an interlocal agreement between the jurisdictions that are part of the TBD. The governing board must consist of at least five members, including at least one elected official from each participating jurisdiction. Transportation benefit districts are given authority to impose vehicle license fees (RCW 36.73.040(3)(b)), levy a sales and use tax after approval by a majority of voters (RCW 36.73.040(3)(a)), limited vehicle tolls on state routes or city streets (RCW 36.73.040(3)(d), levy an excess property tax (RCW 36.73.060), issue general obligation bonds (RCW 36.73.070), establish local improvement districts (RCW 36.73.080), and impose impact fees (RCW 36.73.120) to fund transportation improvements. However, the impact fees may be imposed only on commercial and industrial development. The three most common forms of funding (vehicle license fees, sales taxes, and property taxes) are discussed below. Vehicle License Fees Vehicle license fees of up to $50 may be imposed without a public vote; however, this is limited as follows: • Up to $20 vehicle license fee allowed from formation • Up to $40 vehicle license fee allowed if a $20 fee has been in effect for at least 24 months • Up to $50 vehicle license fee allowed if a $40 fee has been in effect for at least 24 months The TBD may also impose voter -approved vehicle license fees up to $100. Annual revenues are estimated as follows: Average Vehicle Count Subject to Fee (1) Tab Fee $20 Fee $40 Fee 72,417 72,417 $ 20.00 $ 40.00 $ 50.00 $50 Fee 72,417 Estimated Revenue Generated $ 1,448,340.00 $ 2,896,680.00 $ 3,620,850.00 Less: Dept of Licensing Administrative Fee (1°/0) $ (14,483.40) $ (28,966.80) $ (36,208.50) Estimated Net Revenue Received by the City $ 1,433,856.60 $ 2,867,713.20 $ 3,584,641.50 (1) Estimated vehicles in the City subject to the fee per the Washington State Department of Licensing. Sales and Use Taxes A TBD may impose a sales and use tax of up to 0.2%. This tax may not be imposed for longer than 10 years at a time, except to repay debt, and must be approved by a simple majority of voters. Annual revenues are estimated as follows: 2017 Estimated Gross Taxable Sales in the City Multiplied by: TBD Sales Tax Rate Voted Property Tax Levy $ 2,481,074,612.94 0.20% $ 4,962,149.23 A TBD may levy a property tax in excess of the one percent limitation for a one-year period whenever authorized by the voters of the district. It may also pay for the retirement of voter - approved general obligation bonds, issued for capital purposes only, by levying bond retirement property tax levies in excess of the one percent limitation whenever authorized by voters of the district. Transportation benefit district revenue may be used for transportation improvements included in a local, regional, or state transportation plan (RCW 36.73.015(6)). Improvements can range from roads and transit service to sidewalks and transportation demand management. Construction, maintenance, and operation costs are eligible. Over 100 TBDs have been formed throughout Washington. Of these, only three have multiple funding sources (vehicle license fees and sales tax), only five have vehicle license fees above $20, and only one has a vehicle license fee above $40. Per the Municipal Research Services Center, the Seattle TBD is the only district to successfully pass a voted vehicle license fee; however, there are a number of TBDs that have successfully passed voted sales taxes. In the Spokane area, TBDs have been formed in Spokane, Liberty Lake, and Airway Heights. See Attachment #3 for further details. Banked Property Tax Capacity Banked property tax capacity is the difference between what the City could levy (the highest lawful levy) and what it actually levies for property tax. The City's banked property tax capacity for 2018 is $650,326. Banked capacity can be accessed by the City through the annual property tax levy ordinance that is adopted by Council. Accessing the banked capacity resets the base upon which the City's future property tax calculations are made, and it does not mean that the City can go back in time and collect the property taxes that have been left behind. Levy Lid Lift: A levy lid lift is voter approval to increase the jurisdiction's property tax levy by greater than the 1% limitation. Levy lid lifts can be single -year or multi-year and may be temporary or permanent. The ballot measure for a levy lid lift requires a simple majority of voters to pass. However, banked capacity must be used prior to using a levy lid lift. A levy lid lift may be for a restricted period and/or restricted purpose depending on how the ballot measure is stated. Utility Tax: The City has the authority to impose utility taxes under RCW 35A.82.020. The tax rate is limited to 6% (without a vote of the people) for the following: • Electricity • Natural gas • Steam • Telephone A higher tax rate may be imposed with majority voter approval. There are no rate limits for the following activities: • Sewer/Stormwater • Solid waste • Water • Cable television (however, the rate must be the same or similar to other utilities in order to not be discriminatory) There are no statutory limitations on the use of utility tax revenues; however, Council may choose to dedicate the revenues toward a specific activity, such as transportation and infrastructure needs. Any changes in the tax rate cannot take effect until the end of 60 days after the enactment of the ordinance by the City. Currently the City only imposes a utility tax of 6% on telephone providers, which was effective beginning January 1, 2009. The revenue generated by this tax is designated in SVMC Chapter 3.70.140 for exclusive use in the City road fund (Street O&M Fund #101), as is discussed previously in the Street Fund #101 section above. One of the reasons that a broader utility tax has been rejected by the City in the past is that we did not believe that we could impose the utility tax on quasi -municipal entities providing utility services in the City. Our area is unique in that we have a mixture of utility providers that are either private businesses or quasi -municipal entities. If the City were to impose a utility tax on only the private business, it would cause an inequity among citizens who were contributing toward the tax because some citizens are served by private businesses and others are served by quasi -municipal entities. However, a court case in 2014 clarified that the City can impose a utility tax on another municipality or public agency if they are deriving revenues on proprietary activities. The case was specifically related to water utilities but applies to any activity that is considered to be proprietary in nature. That being the case, the City is generally no longer in the position of only imposing a utility tax on some providers and not others, which makes any future utility tax apply more equitably to all of the City's population. Attachment #4 shows the revenue estimates ranging from a 1% to a 6% utility tax on each of these services. The amount generated by the City on a utility tax would depend upon the tax rate selected as well as which services were taxed. For comparison purposes, Attachment #5 shows the utility tax rates of neighboring jurisdictions for various services as well as the current Spokane Valley telephone utility tax. OPTIONS: Continue discussion on current and projected deficits for the Street O&M Fund #101, including potential new revenue sources or reductions in services. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: None at this time. However, staff is seeking Council direction on preferred revenue options or whether Council wishes that staff reduce service levels for the Street O&M Fund #101 in the 2019 Budget. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Based on the preliminary 2019 Budget, the Street O&M Fund #101 will have depleted its fund balance before the end of 2019 due to the anticipated deficit of approximately $741,000 in recurring expenditures exceeding recurring revenues. Current projections for the years of 2020 through 2023 show deficits continuing to increase annually in order to maintain current levels of service in Fund #101. Without either additional revenue sources or cuts to service levels, the conditions in the Street O&M Fund #101 are no longer sustainable as of 2019. STAFF CONTACT: John Hohman, Deputy City Manager; Chelsie Taylor, Finance Director; and Erik Lamb, Deputy City Attorney ATTACHMENTS: • Illustrative Attachments: o Attachment #1 — Telephone Utility Tax Collections for the Years 2009 through 2017 o Attachment #2 — Street Fund #101 Projection through 2023 o Attachment #3 — Comparison of Transportation Benefit Districts with Other Jurisdictions o Attachment #4 — Annual Utility Tax Revenue Estimates for the City o Attachment #5 — Comparison of Utility Tax Rates with Other Jurisdictions • PowerPoint Presentation il CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Telephone Utility Tax Collections - December For the years 2009 through 2017 Attachment #1 2009 2010 1 2011 2012 1 2013 2014 1 2015 2016 1 2017 January 128,354 February 282,773 March 230,721 April 275,775 May 242,115 June 239,334 July 269,631 August 260,408 September 249,380 October 252,388 November 254,819 December 368,775 234,622 266,041 264,175 254,984 255,056 251,880 250,593 246,261 240,111 238,500 247,848 236,065 241,357 230,366 245,539 238,561 236,985 239,013 244,191 349,669 241,476 237,111 240,246 236,449 193,818 261,074 234,113 229,565 227,469 234,542 226,118 228,789 227,042 225,735 225,319 221,883 217,478 216,552 223,884 214,618 129,270 293,668 213,078 211,929 210,602 205,559 212,947 213,097 210,777 205,953 208,206 206,038 210,010 210,289 205,651 205,645 199,193 183,767 213,454 202,077 177,948 212,845 174,738 214,431 187,856 187,412 190,984 185,172 183,351 183,739 175,235 183,472 182,167 173,971 177,209 171,770 174,512 170,450 174,405 171,909 170,476 166,784 166,823 168,832 162,734 163,300 162,536 157,285 161,506 156,023 157,502 150,644 155,977 153,075 151,208 161,115 2/12/2018 2017 to 2016 Difference $ % (19,433) (10.67%) (10,671) (6.13%) (14,673) (8.28%) (14,485) (8.43%) (13,006) (7.45%) (14,427) (8.46%) (16,903) (9.69%) (21,265) (12.37%) (14,499) (8.51%) (13,709) (8.22%) (15,615) (9.36%) (7,717) (4.57%) Total Collections 3,054,473 2,986,136 2,980,963 2,735,467 2,562,682 2,461,060 2,257,183 2,069,308 1,892,905 (176,403) (8.52%) Budget Estimate 2,500,000 2,800,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 2,900,000 2,750,000 2,565,100 2,340,000 2,000,000 Actual over (under) budg 554,473 186,136 (19,037) (264,533) (337,318) (288,940) (307,917) (270,692) (107,095) Total actual collections as a % of total budget 122.18% 106.65% 99.37% 91.18% 88.37% 89.49% 88.00% 88.43% 94.65% % change in annual total collected n/a (2.24%) (0.17%) (8.24%) (6.32%) (3.97%) (8.28%) (8.32%) (8.52%) Chart Reflecting History of Collections through the Month of December 3,500,000 3,000,000 2,500,000 2,000,000 1,500,000 1,000,000 500,000 0 1 December 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Tax Revenue\Telephone Tax\2017\telephone utility tax collections 2017 - December.xlsx • December • November • October ■ September • August ■ July ■ June • May • April N I March ■ February • January CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Fund #101 - Street Fund Projection through 2023 RECURRING ACTIVITY Revenues Attachment #2 (6) (1)(6) Actual 2015 Actual 2016 Actual 2017 Initial Budget 2018 Adopted Budget 2018 Preliminary Budget 2019 7/7/2016 11/27/2016 9/8/2016 5/7/2018 11/1/2016 Projected 2020 1 2021 1 2022 1 2023 Telephone Utility Tax Alternate Revenue Stream 2,257,184 2,069,309 1,892,906 1,900,000 1,900,000 1,700,000 1,611,940 1,528,442 1,449,268 1,374,196 O 0 0 0 0 0 1,250,773 1,433,175 1,613,229 1,791,199 Motor Vehicle Fuel (Gas) Tax Multimodal Transportation Revenue Right -of -Way Maintenance Fee Investment Interest Insurance Premiums & Recoveries Miscellaneous Revenue Total Recurring Revenues Expenditures Wages / Benefits / Payroll Taxes Supplies Services & Charges Snow Operations Intergovernmental Payments Interfund Transfers -out - #001 Interfund Transfers -out - #311 (pavement preservation) Interfund Transfers -out - #501 (non -plow vehicle rental) Interfund Transfers -out - #501 (plow replace.) Signal Detection Replacement Program Traffic Signal Replacement Program Battery backups for intersections Total Recurring Expenditures Recurring Revenues over (under) Recurring Expenditures NONRECURRING ACTIVITY (2) (3) 1,935,629 2,005,870 2,032,174 2,052,400 2,052,400 2,046,700 2,046,700 2,046,700 2,046,700 2,046,700 O 95,509 98,994 133,800 133,800 131,900 131,900 131,900 131,900 131,900 11,200 56,035 136,112 70,000 70,000 70,000 70,000 70,000 70,000 70,000 3,212 5,886 7,843 6,000 6,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 4,319 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9,649 188 0 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 4,221,193 4,232,797 4,168,029 4,172,200 4,172,200 3,966,600 5,129,313 5,228,216 5,329,097 5,431,995 738,381 736,538 811,402 768,196 771,019 819,763 836,158 852,881 869,939 887,338 116,660 87,534 98,747 112,500 112,500 113,300 115,566 117,877 120,235 122,640 2,052,457 2,114,608 2,074,977 2,141,751 2,141,751 2,207,908 2,583,566 2,635,237 2,687,942 2,741,701 465,232 409,635 637,359 504,800 504,800 527,200 537,744 548,499 559,469 570,658 707,967 836,513 748,703 851,000 851,000 855,000 872,100 889,542 907,333 925,479 39,700 39,700 39,700 39,700 39,700 0 0 0 0 0 206,618 67,342 67,342 67,342 67,342 0 0 0 0 0 12,077 31,000 23,250 23,250 21,250 21,250 21,250 21,250 21,250 21,250 O 40,000 77,929 77,929 77,929 77,929 77,929 77,929 77,929 77,929 O 0 49,702 40,000 0 45,000 45,000 45,000 45,000 45,000 O 0 0 200,000 0 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 O 0 0 0 0 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 4,339,092 4,362,870 4,629,111 4,826,468 4,587,291 4,707,350 5,129,313 5,228,216 5,329,097 5,431,995 (117,899) (130,073) (461,082) (654,268) (415,091) (740,750) 0 0 0 0 (144,268) 5,500 209,732 (45,000) (15,000) 0 0 0 0 0 Excess (Deficit) of Total Revenues Over (Under) Total Expenditures (262,167) (124,573) (251,350) (699,268) (430,091) (740,750) 0 0 0 0 Beginning fund balance 1,705,244 1,443,077 1,318,504 1,067,154 1,067,154 637,063 (103,687) (103,687) (103,687) (103,687) Ending fund balance 1,443,077 1,318,504 1,067,154 367,886 637,063 (103,687) (103,687) (103,687) (103,687) (103,687) Assumptions (1) The actual numbers presented for 2017 are preliminary and unaudited as of April 26, 2018. They are subject to change as we complete the audit process. (2) For purposes of this analysis, we assumed that the telephone utility tax will continue to decline at the average annual rate of 5.18%, which is what the City has seen historically. (3) The projection for the alternative revenue stream equals the amount necessary to bring recurring revenues to an amount that covers recurring expenditures for the years 2020 through 2023. (4) For purposes of this projection, expenditures from 2020 to 2023 are calculated at an increase of 2% annually. The expenditures for the 2019 Budget are prelminary and are subject to change as the City progresses through the 2019 Budget development process. (5) The Street Fund is assumed to have no contributions to the General Fund nor the Pavement Preservation Fund from 2020 to 2023. (6) Actuals in 2016 and 2017 do not include $500,000 in winter response costs that were expended out of the Winter Weather Reserve Fund #122. H:\Pavement Preservation Program\101 Forecast.xlsx (4) (5) (5) CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Comparison of TBDs with Other Jurisdictions Municipality Spokane Liberty Lake Airway Heights Attachment #3 5/3/2018 Year Formed Assumed Powers? Vehicle License Fee TBD Sales Tax 2011 No $ 20.00 0.0% 2002 No $ - 0.0% 2011 No $ - 0.2% Note: TBD information was obtained from the MRSC website at http://m rsc. org/getdoc/042e7d31-772b-4102-a785- 1363d09a3bcb/TBD-List-Map.aspx on May 3, 2018. H:\Pavement Preservation Program\TBD Comparisons Other Jurisdictions.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Annual Utility Tax Revenue Estimates for the City Attachment #4 9/8/2016 10/10/2016 11/1/2016 1% Utility Tax 2% Utility Tax 3% Utility Tax 4% Utility Tax 5% Utility Tax 6% Utility Tax Electric Services $762,811 $1,525,621 $2,288,432 $3,051,243 $3,814,053 $4,576,864 Natural Gas Services 261,662 523,325 784,987 1,046,649 1,308,312 1,569,974 Sewer Services 140,827 281,654 422,482 563,309 704,136 844,963 Solid Waste Disposal Services 60,566 121,132 181,698 242,264 302,830 363,396 Water 68,813 137,627 206,440 275,253 344,066 412,880 $1,294,679 $2,589,359 $3,884,039 $5,178,718 $6,473,397 $7,768,077 H:\Utility Taxes\Utility Tax Revenue Estimates.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Comparison of Utility Tax Rates with Other Jurisdictions Municipality Spokane Liberty Lake Cheney Deer Park Airway Heights Pullman Millwood Spokane Valley Attachment #5 5/7/2018 Electricity Natural Gas Telephone Cable TV Solid Waste Water Sewer 6.0% 6.0% 6.0% 6.0% 20.0% 20.0% 20.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 0.0% 0.0% CO CO 6.0% 5.0% 6.0% 11.0% 11.0% 6.0% 6.0% 6.0% 6.0% 12.0% 12.0% 12.0% 6.0% 6.0% 6.0% 3.0% 10.0% 19.8% 15.0% 8.0% 8.0% 8.0% 8.0% 11.0% 8.0% 8.0% 6.0% 2.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 6.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% (1) Rates are 6% for Regular, 4% for Residential Street and 4.75% for Parks. Note: Utility tax rates for otherjuridictions were taken from the AVVC 2015 Municipal Taxes and Fees Survey, which was obtained at https://www. awcnet. org/Data Resou rces/resou rcesbytopic/Taxand U serFeeSurvey. aspx or from the municipal code of the jurisdiction. H:\Pavement Preservation Program\Utility Tax Comparisons Other Jurisdictions.xlsx STREET FUND #101 STRATEGIES Spokane jUalley� DISCUSSION ITEMS ■ Street Program Funding Summary ■ Funding History ■ Street O&M Fund #10I Overview Fund #I0I Revenue Challenges ■ Projected Fund #101 needs ■ New revenue options ■ Conclusions ■ Next Steps Questions STREET PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY Fund # I 0 I Street O&M 303 Street Construction Grants and REET Construction/reconstruction Funding Gas and phone tax Uses Patching, Crack Seal, Snow Plow, Etc 3 I 1 Pavement Preservation Grants, General Fund, Overlays, surface treatments Street wear fee, REET 3 COUNCIL DISCUSSION HISTORYAND PROPOSED NEED Street Operations and Maintenance Council discussions related to financing current and future projected deficits in transportation and infrastructure date back to 2004. Proposed utility tax ordinance. Did not advance to a second reading. A 6% telephone utility tax ordinance was approved by Council in 2008 and went into effect in 2009. Tax is applied to both land lines and the voice portion of cell phones. The City has continued to see a decline in these tax collections since implementation. COUNCIL DISCUSSION HISTORYAND PROPOSED NEED ■ Conversations about how to adequately address street O&M needs have been a featured discussion in the budget development cycle of each year since incorporation. 2016 — Multiple discussions occur on funding needs and potential solutions ■ 2016 — Proposed 6% utility tax for pavement preservation does not move forward ■ 2017 — Staff re-evaluates the condition of the streets and revisits need projections ■ 2018 — Council passed $1.4 million City Fee as part of new solid waste collection contract to help fund pavement preservation ■ 2018 — Staff presents revised pavement preservation needs at the FebruaryWinterWorkshop ■ Immediate need is to determine whether to add additional 2019 revenues for Street O&M Fund # 101. If no additional revenues are added, services will need to be cut to stay within current revenue constraints. STREET O&M FUND #10I ■ The Street Fund generally accounts for the operations and maintenance of City Streets. ■ Includes street pavement repairs, traffic signals and signs, landscaping and vegetation control, snow and ice control, etc. ■ The adopted 2018 Budget has recurring expenditures of about $4,587,000. However, identified needs at the 2018 BudgetWorkshop on June 13, 2017 were approximately $4,826,000. A decision was made to reduce recurring expenditures due to revenue constraints. ■ Staff = 5.725 FTEs and 2 interns SERVICES PROVIDED IN STREET O&M FUND #10I ■ Expenditures include in part: $1,500,000 Street Maintenance — pothole patching, asphalt repairs, street surface treatments, concrete and sidewalk repairs, roadside landscaping, litter and weed control, pavement restoration $1,000,000 for pavement preservation $915,000 Traffic Operations and Maintenance — Maintain and operate 87 traffic signals, electrical costs, equipment replacement, 32 school zone beacons, signs, striping and pavement markings a $485,000 Street Lighting — electric bill to light streets, intersections and sidewalks $20,000 Street Sweeping — this service is shared with the Stormwater Utility which pays 96% of total costs which are about $500,000 $95,000 Public Works Maintenance Shop and Fleet Maintenance — building maintenance, electricity, water, sewer, trash, common area fees, and vehicle maintenance $505,000 Snow Maintenance — plowing, deicing materials, equipment, plow trucks a $40,000 Bridge Maintenance and Repairs Note: Budget amounts are rounded and approximate for illustration purposes. FUNDING SOURCES IN STREET O&M FUND #10I Estimated major revenue sources in the preliminary 2019 Budget: MotorVehicle Fuel Tax - $2,046,700 Multimodal Transportation Revenue - $131,900 Telephone Utility Tax - $1,700,000 SVMC 3.70 — Provides for a tax of 6% on telephone services within the City including both landline telephones and cell phones. Has decreased at an average annual rate of 5.18% since implementation. Collected $176k Tess in 2017 than in 2016. MOTORVEHICLE FUEL TAX 2,100 2,050 2,000 c 1,950 N 0 -I 1,900 1,850 1,800 1,750 1,996 1,927 1,928 MotorVehicle Fuel Tax Collections 1,858 1,847 1,868 1.878 1,944 2,014 2,041 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 9 MOTORVEHICLE FUEL TAX 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Annual Collections 1,995,610 1,926,673 1,928,005 1,857,707 1,846,990 1,868,053 1,878,475 1,943,793 2,014,330 2,040,748 $ Increase (Decrease) (68,937) 1,332 (70,298) (10,717) 21,063 10,422 65,318 70,537 26,418 Increase (Decrease) (3.45%) 0.07% (3.65%) (0.58%) 1.14% 0.56% 3.48% 3.63% 1.31% DECLINING TELEPHONE UTILITY TAX REVENUES 3,500 3,000 2,500 N 7 2,000 V, 0 0 -1 1,500 1,000 500 0 3,054 2,986 2,981 Telphone UtilityTax Collections 2,735 2,563 2,461 2,257 2,069 1,893 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 DECLINING TELEPHONE UTILITY TAX REVENUES 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Annual Collections 3,054,473 2,986,136 2,980,963 2,735,467 2,562,682 2,461,060 2,257,183 2,069,308 1,892,905 $ Decrease Decrease (68,337) (5,173) (245,496) (172,785) (101,622) (203,877) (187,875) (176,403) (2.24%) (0.17%) (8.24%) (6.32%) (3.97%) (8.28%) (8.32%) (8.52%) TELEPHONE UTILITY TAX Current 6%Telephone Utility Tax: 2009 collections were $3.05 million. 2017 collections were $1.9 million. 2019 collections are estimated at $1.7 million. We anticipate they will continue declining into the future. Uncertain when revenues will bottom out. ADDITIONAL CHALLENGES IN STREET O&M FUND #10I ■ City has retained a consultant to review entire maintenance program • Consultant will provide recommendations to improve efficiency and cost effectiveness • Additional areas of need may be discovered ■ City lacks a comprehensive Asset Management Program • Identify City Assets • Track maintenance/replacement cycles ■ Limited replacement funds for: • Aging traffic signal and signal detection equipment • Bridge components STREET FUND PROJECTION THROUGH 2023 Recurring Revenues Recurring Expenditures Recurring Activity Deficit Nonrecurring Revenues Nonrecurring Expenditures Nonrecurring Activity Deficit Total Change in Fund Balance Actual Actual Actual 2015 2016 2017 2018 Initial Adopted Preliminary Budget 2019 Projected 2020 2021 2022 2023 $ 4,221 $ 4,233 $ 4,168 $ 4,172 $ 4,172 $ 3,967 $ 3,879 $ 3,795 $ 3,716 $ 3,641 (4,339) (4,363) (4,629) (4,827) (4,587) (4,707) (5,129) (5,228) (5,329) (5,432) (118) (130) (461) (655) (415) (740) 72 225 (144) (66) (16) (45) (15) (144) 6 209 (45) (15) (1,250) (1,433) (1,613) (1,791) (262) (124) (252) (700) (430) (740) (1,250) (1,433) (1,613) (1,791) Beginning Fund Balance 1,705 1,443 1,319 1,067 1,067 637 (103) (1,353) (2,786) (4,399) Ending Fund Balance $ 1,443 $ 1,319 $ 1,067 $ 367 $ 637 $ (103) $ (1,353) $ (2,786) $ (4,399) $ (6,190) **Amounts in thousands. See detail in attachment to the Request for Council Action. Actuals in 2016 and 2017 do not include $500k in snow related expenditures that were accounted for in the Winter Weather Reserve Fund #I22. STREET FUND REVENUE NEEDS Projected Funding Needs: Street Fund #I0 Projected (in millions) 2020 2021 2022 2023 $ 1.3 $ 1.4 $ 1.6 $ 1.8 REVENUE OPTIONS ■ Street Fund assumptions in defining revenue needs are: ■ Recurring revenues must be at least equal to recurring expenditures to finance current service levels, ■ Telephone Utility Tax collections will continue to decrease at annual average rate of 5. 1 8% ■ Recurring expenditures will increase at an inflation rate of 2% annually, and ■ The Street Fund will no longer make contributions to the General Fund #00 I nor the Pavement Preservation Fund #3 1 1. ■ Revenue Options ■ Transportation Benefit District ■ Property Tax Banked Capacity ■ Levy Lid Lift ■ Utility Tax REVENUE OPTIONS -TRANSPORTATION BENEFIT DISTRICT ■ Formation ■ A transportation benefit district (TBD) is a separate legal entity. ■ ATBD may be formed by a city or county by ordinance following a public hearing. ■ A city or county may assume the powers of aTBD if it has the same boundaries. • At the point of assumption, the TBD ceases to be a separate legal entity. ■ Use of Funds ■ Revenues collected by aTBD may be used for transportation improvements included in local, regional, or state transportation plans. ■ Construction, maintenance, and operation costs are eligible. REVENUE OPTIONS -TRANSPORTATION BENEFIT DISTRICT Funding Sources Vehicle License Fees: • Vehicle license fees of up to $50 may be imposed without a public vote; however, this is limited as follows: • Up to $20 vehicle license fee allowed from formation • Up to $40 vehicle license fee allowed if a $20 fee has been in effect for at least 24 months Up to $50 vehicle license fee allowed if a $40 fee has been in effect for at least 24 months Vehicle License fees of up to $100 may be imposed if approved by a simple majority of voters. Estimated annual revenues from vehicle license fees are as follows: ■ $ I.4 million at $20 fee ■ $2.9 million at $40 fee $3.6 million at $50 fee 19 REVENUE OPTIONS -TRANSPORTATION BENEFIT DISTRICT ■ Funding sources, cont. ■ Sales and Use Taxes ■ ATBD may impose a sales and use tax of up to 0.2% for up to 10 years (except to pay for debt service). ■ This tax must be approved by a majority of voters. ■ The tax is in addition to any other taxes authorized by law. The estimated annual revenue from a 0.2% sales and use tax is just under $5 million (based on 2017 gross sales within the City). ■ Estimate would be $3.3 million at the City's historic low for sales tax collections (2010). ■ Excess Property Taxes ■ ATBD may levy a property tax in excess of the one percent limitation for a one-year period whenever authorized by the voters of the district. ■ ATBD may pay for the retirement of voter -approved general obligation bonds, issued for capital purposes only, by Igyying bond retirement property tax levies in excess of the one percent limitation whenever authorized by voters of the district. TRANSPORTATION BENEFIT DISTRICT COMPARISON TO OTHER MUNICIPALITIES Municipality Spokane Liberty Lake Airway Heights Year Formed Assumed Powers? Vehicle License Fee TBD Sales Tax 2011 2002 2011 No No No $ 20.00 $ - $ - 0.0% 0.0% 0.2% Note: TBD information was obtained from the MRSC website at http://m rsc.org/getdoc/042e7d31-772b-4102-a785- 1363d09a3bcb/TBD-List-Map.aspx on May 3, 2018. ■ Over 100 TBDs have formed throughout Washington Only three have multiple funding sources (vehicle license fees and sales tax) Only five have vehicle license fees above $20, and only one is above $40 Per MRSC, the only TBD to have successfully passed a voted vehicle license fee is the Seattle TBD. However, there are a number of cities that have successfully passed the voted 0.2% sales tax. REVENUE OPTIONS -PROPERTY TAX -BANKED CAPACITY(UPDATE) Banked capacity is the difference between what the City could levy (the Highest Lawful Levy) and what it actually levies for property tax. Banked capacity can be accessed by the City through the annual property tax levy ordinance that is adopted by Council. ■ Accessing the banked capacity resets the base upon which the City's future property tax calculations are made, and it does not mean that the City can go back in time and collect the property taxes that have been left behind. • The City's banked property tax capacity for 2018 is $650,326. REVENUE OPTIONS - LEVY LID LIFT ■ A levy lid lift is voter approval to increase the jurisdiction's property tax levy by greater than the 1 limitation. ■ The ballot measure for a levy lid lift requires a simple majority of voters to pass. ■ Banked capacity must be used prior to using a levy lid lift. ■ A levy lid lift may be for a restricted period and/or restricted purpose depending on how the ballot measure is stated. REVENUE OPTIONS - UTILITY TAX ■ Utility tax rate limited by state law to 6% (without voter approval) for: ■ Electricity ■ Natural gas ■ Steam ■ Telephone ■ Utility tax rate NOT limited by state law for: ■ Sewer/Stormwater ■ Solid waste ■ Water ■ Cable television (cannot be discriminatory) REVENUE OPTIONS - UTILITY TAX ■ There are no statutory limitations on the use of utility tax revenues. ■ Any changes in the tax rate cannot take effect until the end of 60 days after the enactment of an ordinance by the City. ■ Taxation of Other Municipalities ■ Clarified through a court case in 2014 that a city may impose utility taxes on other jurisdictions if they are acting in a proprietary capacity. UTILITY TAX COMPARISON TO OTHER MUNICIPALITIES (REMOVE 6%) Municipality Spokane Liberty Lake Cheney Deer Park Airway Heights Pullman Millwood Spokane Valley Electricity Natural Gas Telephone Cable TV Solid Waste Water Sewer 6.0% 6.0% 6.0% 6.0% 20.0% 20.0% 20.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 0.0% 0.0% (1) (1) 6.0% 5.0% 6.0% 1I.0% 1I.0% 6.0% 6.0% 6.0% 6.0% 1 2.0% 1 2.0% 1 2.0% 6.0% 6.0% 6.0% 3.0% 1 0.0% 1 9.8% 1 5.0% 8.0% 8.0% 8.0% 8.0% 11.0% 8.0% 8.0% 6.0% 2.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 6.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% (1) Rates are 6% for Regular, 4% for Residential Street and 4.75% for Parks. Note: Utility tax rates for other juridictions were taken from the AWC 2015 Municipal Taxes and Fees Survey, which was obtained at https://www.awcnet.org/DataResources/resourcesbytopic/Taxand UserFeeSurvey.aspx or from the municipal code of the jurisdiction. UTILITY TAX REVENUE ESTIMATES % Utility Tax 2% Utility Tax 3% Utility Tax 4% Utility Tax 5% Utility Tax 6% Utility Tax Electric Services $762,811 $1,525,621 $2,288,432 $3,051,243 $3,814,053 $4,576,864 Natural Gas Services 261,662 523,325 784,987 1,046,649 1,308,312 1,569,974 Sewer Services 140,827 281,654 422,482 563,309 704,136 844,963 Solid Waste Disposal Services 60,566 121,132 181,698 242,264 302,830 363,396 Water 68,813 137,627 206,440 275,253 344,066 412,880 $1,294,679 $2,589,359 $3,884,039 $5,178,718 $6,473,397 $7,768,077 These are the same utility tax revenue estimates that were used in the 2016 Council discussions of this topic. CONCLUSIONS ■ Street Fund #10I needs new revenue source for 2019 ■ Alternatively, historic service levels need to be reduced by $741,000 for 2019 ■ New revenue options are available that would restore historic levels of funding for Fund #10I NEXT STEPS Street Fund #I0 I Identify preferred revenue options Public Input and Discussions Implement new funding source or direct staff to reduce service levels for 2019 Pavement Preservation# 31 I Continue preliminary engineering for first expenditure of the Street Wear Fee Consultant review of staff's pavement preservation funding needs assessment Additional Council and public discussions on verified needs assessment Continue Council discussions on revenue options for Fund #311 QUESTIONS COMMENTS DISCUSSION CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: May 29, 2018 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ['consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ['public hearing ❑ information ® admin. report ['pending legislation ['executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Economic Analysis of Tourism Related Venues and Events GOVERNING LEGISLATION: None PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: • March 8, 2016, Council heard a report from Community Attributes, Inc. (CAI) on the Retail Improvement Study, as well as the Tourism Enhancement Study. • August 16, 2016, Council authorized staff to move forward with the analysis of six potential tourism enhancement projects. • November 30. 2016. Council and staff attended a special Council meeting to hear about and discuss the CSL Feasibility Study. the purpose of which was to consider a potential sports complex on land located near the HUB facility, and for potential major enhancements to Spokane County's existing Plante's Ferry Sports Facility. • December 20, 2016, Council heard a report from CAI on an update to the Tourism Enhancement Study, including analysis of the six projects approved by Council as well as the Plante's Ferry expansion and the HUB Complex. • Also, Council heard at the November 17, 2017 council meeting that staff was having CAI perform an analysis on expanding the outdoor venue at CenterPlace in addition to the other projects in the Tourism Enhancement Study. • February 13, 2018, Council heard an administrative report on this topic. BACKGROUND: In the attachments to this report Staff have prepared an analysis of the economic impact of ten potential tourism enhancement projects. Our analysis is based upon four separate consultant prepared documents: • the CAI report titled Spokane Valley Tourism Analysis — Phase II Project Profiles dated March 2017, • the CSL Feasibility Study from November 2016, • the CAI report titled CenterPlace Expansion Economic Impact Assessment dated April 2018, and • a recently completed draft report from CAI that analyzes the economic impact of future improvements to Browns Park. In the analysis, the top box computes the amount that the City would have to borrow to actually construct the amenity: • The line titled "Mid -Range Capital Costs is the mid -point of the estimated cost of construction provided in either the CSL or CAI studies. It is important to understand that the actual capital costs may be higher or lower than that used in the estimates in the summary. • The funding also assumes that Spokane County is contributing $5,861,000 towards Plante's Ferry and $2,500,000 towards the HUB Complex as a result of a levy lift. It is unknown if this would actually occur and as a result a second attachment shows the analysis of these two projects if the County does not make these contributions. Staff have also assumed the use of all of the proceed collected to date of the 1.3% lodging tax accounted for in our Hotel/Motel Tax — Tourism Facilities Fund #104. The P:ICity ClerklAgendaPackets for Web1201812018, 05-291item 7 2018 05 29 RCA for Economic Analysis of Tourism Related Venues Events.docx City imposed this tax at the request of the Lodging Tax Advisory Committee effective July 1, 2015, and the proceeds of this tax are to be used solely for capital expenditures for acquiring, constructing, making improvements to other capital related expenditures for large sporting venues or venues for tourism -related facilities that generate overnight guests at lodging facilities. The balance of this fund at the end of 2018 is estimated at $1,826,732. • For the CenterPlace Expansion project and the Browns Park Improvements project, capital costs are reduced by $200,000 which reflects General Fund money being used toward these projects in the 2018 Budget. • The remaining capital costs would be financed by borrowing money which would be facilitated through an LTGO bond issue. Staff calculated the estimated bond payments based upon the following assumptions: o Annual interest rate of 4.5%. o Bonds repaid over 30 years for all projects except the HUB Complex where we estimate bonds would be repaid over an average of 20 years (in reality the bond issue related to construction of the ball fields would be repaid over the estimated useful life of the fields of 10 years and structures would be financed over 30 years). o Bond issuance costs of 2% of the net proceeds needed. o The 1.3% lodging tax accounted for in Fund #104 could provide up to $377,000 annually for the bond payment, based on current revenue projections for this tax. The second box on the summary shows the estimated annual revenues and expenditures for each of the projects, including: • Annual operating revenues as estimated by either CAI or CSL. • City Staff's calculation of estimated increases in sales taxes collected by Spokane Valley that result from the project. The estimated increase in sales tax collections is calculated by multiplying the City's 0.85% sales tax rate by the estimated visitor spending in the City, as estimated by CAI or CSL. • Annual operating expenditures as estimated by CAI or CSL. • The estimated annual bond repayment necessary as a result of borrowing money to construct the facility. • The annual gain or loss (net impact on cash) of the project is listed in bold and double underlined near the middle of the page. The third box on the summary lists a few additional economic impacts of the projects. Included here is: • The estimated visitor spending in the City as provided by either the CAI or CSL studies. • City Staff's calculation of increases to sales tax collections. • CAI and CSL's estimated number of jobs created in the City. • The capital costs of the project per job created. It is anticipated by staff that most of the jobs created by these projects would be at minimum wage and part-time in nature. OPTIONS: None — discussion only. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: None — discussion only. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: The Hotel/Motel Tax — Tourism Facilities Fund #104 is estimated to have ending fund balance of $1,826,732 at the end of 2018 (Fund #104 ending fund balance in the 2018 Budget of $1,576,732 plus a transfer in of $250,000 from the Hotel/Motel Tax Fund #105 as was approved by Council on January 9, 2017). Revenues in that fund are currently estimated at $377,000 annually which would finance approximately $6,020,501 in bond proceeds. STAFF CONTACT: Chelsie Taylor, Finance Director and Mark Calhoun, City Manager P:ICity ClerklAgendaPackets for Web1201812018, 05-291item 7 2018 05 29 RCA for Economic Analysis of Tourism Related Venues Events.docx ATTACHMENTS: • Analysis of Potential Tourism Enhancements • Analysis of Potential Tourism Enhancements for Plante's Ferry and HUB Complex assuming no contributions from Spokane County P:ICity ClerklAgendaPackets for Web1201812018, 05-29Vtem 7 2018 05 29 RCA for Economic Analysis of Tourism Related Venues Events.docx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Analysis of Potential Tourism Enhancements Administrative Report May 29, 2018 Council Meeting Special Events l 5/22/2018 Whitewater & Parke Arts & Entertainmentw Fairgroundsw Balfour Pare HU ComplBexo Browns Park Imp (3) CenterPlace Expansioe Capital Costs Mid -Range Capital Costs Less: Spokane County contributions Estimated Fund #104 @ 12/31/18 Other City funding source $ 3,600,000 $ $ - $ $ (1,826,732) $ $ - $ $ 2,350,000 $ 3,825,000 $ 8,400,000 $ 6,400,000 $ 5,861,000 $ 27,880,000 $ 2,500,000 $ 2,014,967 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ (5,861,000) $ (2,500,000) $ - $ - $ (1,826,732) $ (1,826,732) $ (1,826,732) $ (1,826,732) $ - $ (1,826,732) $ (1,826,732) $ (1,814,967) $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ (200,000) $ (200,000) Remaining capital cost to finance $ 1,773,268 $ - $ 523,268 $ 1,998,268 $ 6,573,268 $ 4,573,268 $ - $ 23,553,268 $ 473,268 $ LTGO bond payment $ 111,041 $ - $ 32,767 $ 125,130 $ 411,614 $ 286,375 $ - $ 1,846,898 $ 29,636 $ - 30 -year bond @ 4.5%, issue costs @ 2% (except HUB which is a 20 -year bond) - 1.3% lodging tax may provide up to $377,000 annually for the payment Analysis of Annual Activity Annual revenues - Operating revenues $ - $ - $ - $ 342,500 $ 460,800 $ - $ 1,469,890 $ 1,277,901 $ 2,000 $ 79,250 - Estimated increase in sales tax collections • $ 21,862 $ 12,580 $ 21,565 $ 12,665 $ 27,115 $ - $ 35,514 $ 34,103 $ 1,489 $ 29,427 $ 21,862 $ 12,580 $ 21,565 $ 355,165 $ 487,915 $ $ 1,505,404 $ 1,312,004 $ 3,489 $ 108,677 Annual expenses - Operating expenses $ 8,500 $ 60,000 $ 180,000 $ 341,000 $ 305,000 $ - $ 1,750,352 $ 1,428,683 $ 2,000 $ 27,000 - Bond payment $ 111,041 $ - $ 32,767 $ 125,130 $ 411,614 $ 286,375 $ - $ 1,846,898 $ 29,636 $ Annnual gain (loss) on activities $ 119,541 $ 60,000 $ 212,767 $ 466,130 $ 716,614 $ 286,375 $ 1,750,352 $ 3,275,581 $ 31,636 $ 27,000 $ (97,679) $ (47,420) $ (191,203) $ (110,965) $ (228,699) $ (286,375) $ (244,948) $ (1,963,577) $ (28,147) $ 81,677 Analysis of Other Economic Impacts Estimated visitor spending in the City $ 2,572,000 $ 1,480,000 $ 2,537,000 $ 1,490,000 $ 3,190,000 $ - $ 4,178,110 $ 4,012,116 $ 175,200 $ 3,462,000 - Corresponding increase in sales tax $ 21,862 $ 12,580 $ 21,565 $ 12,665 $ 27,115 $ - $ 35,514 $ 34,103 $ 1,489 $ 29,427 Number of jobs created 32 27 31 20 43 - Capital cost per job created $ 112,500 $ - $ 75,806 $ 191,250 $ 195,349 - The majority of jobs created are assumed by staff to be part-time, minimum wage jobs n/a 83 86 3 62 $ 70,614 $ 324,186 $ 833,333 $ 32,499 (1) Values for capital costs, operating revenues, operating expenses, estimated visitory spending in the City, and number of jobs created was taken directly from the CAI report. (2) Values for capital costs, operating revenues, operating expenses, estimated visitory spending in the City, and number of jobs created was taken directly from the CSL report. (3) Values for operating revenues, operating expenses, estimated visitory spending in the City, and number of jobs created was taken directly from the CAI report. The report is still in draft form, and is therefore subject to change. Capital costs are those estimated by staff to complete the Browns Park Master Plan as of May 22, 2018. (4) Values for capital costs, operating revenues, operating expenses, estimated visitory spending in the City, and number of jobs created was taken directly from the CAI report dated April 6, 2018. CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Analysis of Potential Tourism Enhancements - Plante's Ferry & HUB Complex Without Spokane County Capital Contributions Administrative Report May 29, 2018 Council Meeting 5/22/2018 Trails and Arts Special Events'° Whitewater & Park° Arts & Entertainment° Fairgrounds'° Balfour Park'° Plante's R. HUB Ferry° Complex°) Browns Park Imp (3) CenterPlace Expansion° Capital Costs Mid -Range Capital Costs Less: Spokane County contributions Estimated Fund #104 @ 12/31/18 Other City funding source Remaining capital cost to finance LTGO bond payment - 30 -year bond @ 4.5%, issue costs @ 2% (except HUB which is a 20 -year bond) - 1.3% lodging tax may provide up to $377,000 annually for the payment im $ 5,861,000 $ 27,880,000 $ - $ $ (1,826,732) $ (1,826,732) $ - $ $ 4,034,268 $ 26,053,268 $ 252,623 $ 2,042,932 Analysis of Annual Activity Annual revenues - Operating revenues - Estimated increase in sales tax collections Annual expenses - Operating expenses - Bond payment Annnual loss on activities $ 1,469,890 $ 1,277,901 $ 35,514 $ 34,103 $ 1,505,404 $ 1,312,004 $ 1,750,352 $ 1,428,683 $ 252,623 $ 2,042,932 $ 2,002,975 $ 3,471,615 (497,571) $ (2,159,611) Analysis of Other Economic Impacts Estimated visitor spending in the City - Corresponding increase in sales tax Number of jobs created - Capital cost per job created - The majority of jobs created are assumed by staff to be part-time, minimum wage jobs $ 4,178,110 $ 35,514 83 $ 70,614 $ 4,012,116 $ 34,103 86 $ 324,186 (1) Values for capital costs, operating revenues, operating expenses, estimated visitory spending in the City, and number of jobs created was taken directly from the CAI report. (2) Values for capital costs, operating revenues, operating expenses, estimated visitory spending in the City, and number of jobs created was taken directly from the CSL report. (3) Values for operating revenues, operating expenses, estimated visitory spending in the City, and number of jobs created was taken directly from the CAI report. The report is still in draft form, and is therefore subject to change. Capital costs are those estimated by staff to complete the Browns Park Master Plan as of May 22, 2018. (4) Values for capital costs, operating revenues, operating expenses, estimated visitory spending in the City, and number of jobs created was taken directly from the CAI report dated April 6, 2018. CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: May 29, 2018 Check all that apply: ['consent ❑ old business ['information ® admin. report Department Director Approval: ['new business ['public hearing ['pending legislation ['executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Splash -Down Concessions, Inc. — Lease agreement GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 35A.11.020; chapter 3.49 SVMC. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Splash -Down Concessions, Inc. has leased a portion of Valley Mission Park since the mid-1980s for the purposes of operating a water slide and concession business. The City granted a new 10 -year lease in 2009, which was set to expire April 30, 2019. BACKGROUND: Upon incorporation, the City became the owner of Valley Mission Park, and also became the lessor to Splash -Down. The owner in 2003 was a small, closely -held corporation, and the City's primary contact was shareholder Bill Bleasner. The Bleasner group sold the corporation to Geoff and Melissa Kellogg in 2005, who operated Splash -Down through 2017. The City recently terminated the lease agreement with Splash -Down. The Bleasner group again owns the corporation which owns Splash -Down. There is currently no lease agreement to operate Splash -Down, and the new owners have contacted staff to ask about getting a lease agreement in time to open the weekend of June 8, 2018. Staff has prepared a draft lease agreement that cleans up what appeared to be unnecessary or outdated language from the old lease, and has materially similar terms to the prior lease with the Kelloggs with the exception of two items, as follows: - two year lease (extension by mutual agreement of five additional years, seven total years poss.), the prior lease had a five year lease with a possible extension of another five years; - $15,000 annual lease payment plus leasehold excise tax (lump sum or three payments), a reduction from the prior lease, which charged $25,000. Staff would be happy to answer any questions you may have. OPTIONS: (1) Discuss options regarding grant of new lease; or (2) take other action as appropriate. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Consensus to place on future agenda for motion consideration authorizing City Manager to enter into lease agreement with Splash -Down Concessions, Inc. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Generate $15,000 annually, which is $10,000 less than previously. STAFF CONTACT: Cary Driskell, City Attorney, Mike Stone Parks and Recreation Director ATTACHMENTS: Proposed lease agreement DRAFT LEASE AGREEMENT — SPLASH -DOWN CONCESSIONS, INC. This Agreement is between the City of Spokane Valley, a municipality of the State of Washington, with an address of 10210 East Sprague Avenue, Suite 106, Spokane Valley, Washington, 99206, hereinafter referred to as the "City," and Splash -Down Concessions, Inc. having offices for the transaction of business at ***, Spokane Valley, Washington, 992**, hereinafter referred to as "Splashdown," jointly, hereinafter referred to along with the City as the "Parties." WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, pursuant to RCW 35A.11.020, a city may lease real property, buildings, or facilities in the rendering of recreational services; and WHEREAS, City of Spokane Valley is the owner of Valley Mission Park, located at 11123 East Mission, Spokane Valley, Washington; and WHEREAS, the City (and Spokane County prior to that) previously leased a portion of Valley Mission Park to Splashdown for the purpose of operating a water slide facility for use by the public; WHEREAS, the City issued a notice of termination of the prior Lease Agreement (Agreement) to the prior owners of Splashdown on May 8, 2018 for material breach of the Agreement principally relating to non-payment of the lease amounts; WHEREAS, the new owners of Splashdown are * * * * * *, and the registered agent is John Montgomery, 2206 North Pines, Spokane Valley; WHEREAS, Splashdown, under its new ownership, desires to enter into a new lease agreement with the City under the same terms that have been historically agreed to; WHEREAS, the City desires to have Splashdown continue to provide recreational amenities to the residents of the City and has no other current use for the property at issue. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises set forth herein, the Parties mutually agree as follows: Section 1. Subject and Purpose. - The City leases to Splashdown, subject to the terms and conditions herein contained, certain real property in Valley Mission Park located at 11123 East Mission, Spokane Valley, Washington, and more particularly described as follows: Splashdown Water Slide Agreement Page 1 of 10 DRAFT That portion of Blocks 72, 75, 76 lying South of State Highway and Blocks 78, 79, 81 and 82 all in Pinecroft First Addition according to plat hereof recorded in Book "M" of Plats, Page 35, Spokane County, Washington. Together with that portion of vacated Johnson Street adjoining said Blocks. Except the West 110 feet of said Blocks 72, 75, 78 and 81; also, except the East 346.7 feet of said Blocks 76, 79 and 82; also except that portion of said Block 82 and vacated Johnson Street included within the existing tennis courts. Containing 2.56 acres more or less. This property shall hereinafter be referred to as the "Premises" for the purpose of constructing and operating only a water slide or slides and related landscaping uses. Splashdown is further permitted to sell food, soft drinks, active wear, and souvenirs on the Premises consistent with operation of the water slide. Splashdown and its clients are permitted to use the paved parking lots immediately adjacent to Mission Road (north and south) for purposes directly related to the operation and normal use of the waterpark, and subject to any applicable provisions in the Spokane Valley Municipal Code. The City reserves the right to designate spaces for specific uses which may place limitations on use by Splashdown. Splashdown is not permitted to drive outside of the parking lot area, such as on the grass or sidewalks, without specific written permission from the Parks Director. Section 2. Term. - The initial term of this Agreement shall be for 31 months, commencing on June 1, 2018, and terminating on December 31, 2020. This Agreement may be extended for an additional five years, which would run from January 1, 2021 to December 31, 2025. The option shall be considered and determined no later than November 1, 2020. Section 3. Construction of Slide Facilities. A. Splashdown, at its sole expense, shall construct and maintain upon the Premises a water slide or slides, together with appropriate fencing, support structures, landscaping, splash pool, and all related facilities and equipment. If at any time during the life of this Agreement the Splashdown fails to use the Premises for the purpose of construction and operation of a water slide or slides, without first obtaining permission in writing from the City, this Agreement may at the City's option, be terminated. B. If Splashdown desires to add additional flumes, apparatus, or other recreational items or facilities other than those constructed and in use at the time this Agreement is executed, Splashdown shall first obtain written permission for the City at least 90 days prior to the start of construction, and obtain all necessary permits related thereto. Splashdown Water Slide Agreement Page 2 of 10 DRAFT Section 4. Operation of Slide. A. Splashdown may only utilize the premises for the operation of a business providing recreational water slide services for public use during the last week of May, the months of June, July, and August, and the first month of September; provided, however, that hours of operation shall comply with all provisions as set for in Section 28 (Land Use Action) of this Agreement, such hours of operation which may be imposed in conjunction with any subsequent land use action, if any, or Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) provisions, which may be adopted, whichever is most restrictive. B. Splashdown shall be responsible for garbage, electricity, water, natural gas, sewer, telephone service, and any other public utility of any kind furnished to the Premises during the term of this Agreement, including any extensions. Splashdown shall pay any and all other costs and expenses of every kind whatsoever in connection with the use, operation, and maintenance of the Premises and all activities conducted thereon, and the City shall have no responsibility of any kind whatsoever for any such costs. C. Any signage shall comply with currently adopted SVMC provisions. D. Splashdown shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment, or patron in violation of federal or Washington State law. Section 5. Fee. - Splashdown shall pay to the City for the initial and renewal terms of this Agreement an annual lease payment of $15,000, plus applicable leasehold excise tax (the annual payment). The annual payment may, at Splashdown's option, be paid in one lump sum payment or, alternatively, in three equal payments. If the annual payment for 2018 is in three equal payments, they shall be physically received by the City no later than 4:00 p.m. on August 5, September 5, and October 5. For subsequent years, if the annual payment is in equal payments, the payments shall be due by 4:00 p.m. on July 5, August 5, and September 5. Section 6. Compliance with Leasehold Excise Tax. A. This Agreement is subject to the "leasehold excise tax" pursuant to chapter 82.29A RCW, as adopted or amended, and shall promptly pay the City all leasehold excise tax amounts in addition to the fees set forth in Section 5. The rate is currently 12.84% pursuant to state law, which currently results in a tax of $642 per $5,000 payment, or $1,926 for the annual lease payment of $15,000. This amount may change in the future if chapter 82.29A RCW is amended, and it shall be Splashdown's responsibility to ensure it is paying the correct amount. B. Splashdown agrees to promptly pay when due any other taxes, rates, charges and assessments, special or otherwise and public charges of every kind and nature which may be lawfully imposed or assessed in any way on Splashdown regarding its use of the Splashdown Water Slide Agreement Page 3 of 10 DRAFT Premises. Splashdown further agrees to pay promptly when due all applicable taxes imposed on Splashdown as a result of the services provided upon the Premises. C. Splashdown shall comply with and abide by all federal, state, municipal, and other governmental statutes, ordinances, laws and regulations affecting the Premises, the construction, operation and maintenance of the water slide thereon, the improvements thereon, or any activity conducted on or in such Premises. Section 7. Termination. — In addition to all other rights and remedies, which the Parties may have herein or at law, the Parties may terminate this Agreement as follows: By Splashdown: This Agreement may be terminated by Splashdown upon 30 days written notice upon a default by the City in the performance of any terms of this Agreement required to be performed by the City, and the subsequent failure of the City to remedy such default within 30 days after the receipt from Splashdown of written notice to remedy the same; provided, however, that no notice of termination shall have any force or effect if the City shall have remedied the default prior to the expiration of the 30 -day period, or if the nature of such default is such that a period in excess of 30 days is necessary in order for the City to cure the default and shall diligently continue its efforts to correct such default. In such event, the City shall have a reasonable amount of time to cure the default. By CITY: This Agreement may be terminated by Spokane Valley upon 30 days written notice to Splashdown for the following: A. The failure of Splashdown to make any payments of money as required hereunder after receiving 10 days written notice of its failure to pay such money. B. Abandonment of the Premises by Splashdown and/or the continuance of unauthorized conduct and operation of the business required hereunder for a period of at least five consecutive days. Failure to operate the business as authorized herein would be considered abandonment. Provided, however, that the City agrees that interruptions in the operation of the water slide due to weather conditions or repairs shall not constitute an abandonment of the Premises. C. A default by Splashdown in the performance of any terms, conditions, or covenants of this Agreement, and the failure of Splashdown to remedy such default within 30 days after receipt of written notice to remedy the same. Splashdown may cure any such default to the satisfaction of the City, which shall render the notice of default moot. In such event, Splashdown shall have such time as is reasonably required to cure the default. Section 8. Removal of Improvements. Splashdown Water Slide Agreement Page 4 of 10 DRAFT A. In the event of termination of the lease under Section 8, the Parties shall have the following remedies: By Splashdown: In the event of termination by Splashdown, and except as provided herein, Splashdown shall have the right to remove all improvements from the Premises at any time within 120 days after such termination within the hours of 7:00 a.m and 8:00 p.m. Splashdown shall restore the Premises to its original condition during the same time frame allowed for removal of the structure. By City: In the event of termination by the City or at the end of the term of this Agreement, the CITY shall have the right for a period of 90 days after termination to purchase the improvements from Splashdown at a price to be mutually agreed upon. In the event the City does not exercise its right to purchase the improvements, Splashdown shall remove the same within 120 days after the expiration of such period and restore the Premises to its original condition during the same time frame. B. In the event of a termination, and Splashdown does not remove the improvements placed upon the Premises by Splashdown within the time frames set forth herein, the City may at its option, (1) on the payment of $1.00 take title to said property; or (2) dismantle, remove and store such property at a location convenient to the City and charge to Splashdown a fee for dismantling, removing, transporting, and storing said property. Section 9. Waste and Nuisance Prohibited. - Splashdown shall not commit, or suffer to be committed, any waste or nuisance on the Premises. Section 10. Sewers. The Parties agree to the following allocation of costs with regard to sewer: A. Sewer Capital Facilities Rate: Splashdown shall be responsible for paying all Sewer Capital Facilities Rate charges (i.e. ERU's) allocable to Splashdown's use of the Premises. B. Splashdown shall pay all construction costs incurred to connect new service, increase service due to expansion of the water slide facilities, and to maintain sewer service. Splashdown shall, at its expense, install an additional water meter(s) to measure the flow of water entering the sewered portion of the Premises. C. Splashdown shall hook up to sewer no later than October 31, 2019, or when the City, as the owner of the property, is notified by Spokane County that hookup is required. Splashdown Water Slide Agreement Page 5 of 10 DRAFT D. Splashdown shall pay all monthly sewer charges allocable to Splashdown's use of the Premises. Section 11. Notices. A. All notices, demands, or other writings in this Agreement provided to be given or made or sent or which may be given, or made or sent by either Party hereto to the other, shall be deemed to have been fully given or made or sent when made in writing and deposited in the United States mail, certified, postage pre -paid and return receipt requested, and addressed as follows: To CITY: City of Spokane Valley, Attn: City Manager 10210 East Sprague Avenue Spokane Valley, Washington 99206 To LESSEE: Splash -Down Concessions, Inc. ** Spokane Valley, Washington 9921 B. The address to which any notice, demand, or any other writing may be given or made or sent to any Party may be changed by at least 30 days' written notice. Section 12. Insurance. Splashdown shall procure and maintain, for the duration of the Agreement, insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damage to property which may arise from or in connection with the Splashdown's operation and use of the leased Premises. No Limitation. Splashdown's maintenance of insurance as required by the agreement shall not be construed to limit the liability of Splashdown to the coverage provided by such insurance, or otherwise limit the City's recourse to any remedy available at law or in equity. A. Minimum Scope of Insurance Splashdown shall obtain insurance of the types described below: 1. Commercial General Liability insurance shall be written on Insurance Services Office (ISO) occurrence form CG 00 01 and shall cover premises and contractual liability. The City shall be named as an insured on Splashdown's Commercial General Liability insurance policy using ISO Additional Insured -Managers or Lessors of Premises Form CG 20 11 or a substitute endorsement providing equivalent coverage. 2. Property insurance shall be written on an all risk basis. B. Minimum Amounts of Insurance Splashdown shall maintain the following insurance limits: Splashdown Water Slide Agreement Page 6 of 10 DRAFT 1. Commercial General Liability insurance shall be written with limits no less than $1,000,000 each occurrence, $2,000,000 general aggregate. 2. Property insurance shall be written covering the full value of Splashdown's property and improvements for their full replacement value with no coinsurance provisions. C. Other Insurance Provisions The insurance policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions for Commercial General Liability insurance: 1. Splashdown's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respect the City. Any insurance, self-insurance, or insurance pool coverage maintained by the City shall be excess of Splashdown's insurance and shall not contribute to it. 2. Splashdown's insurance shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be cancelled by either party, except after 30 days prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to the City. D. Acceptability of Insurers Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best rating of not less than A: VII. E. Verification of Coverage Splashdown shall furnish the City with original certificates and a copy of the amendatory endorsements, including but not necessarily limited to the additional insured endorsement, evidencing the insurance requirements of Splashdown. Section 13. Indemnification and Hold Harmless. Splashdown shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any and all claims, suits, actions, or liabilities for injury or death of any person, or for loss or damage to property, which arises out of Splashdown's use of Premises, or from the conduct of Splashdown's business, or from any activity, work or thing done, permitted, or suffered by Splashdown in or about the Premises, except only such injury or damage as shall have been occasioned by the sole negligence of the City. Section 14. Attorney's Fees - If any action at law or in equity shall be brought to enforce the provisions of this lease or to enforce or interpret any of the covenants, terms, or conditions of this lease, or for the recovery of the possession of the Premises, each Party shall pay all of their own attorney's fees. Section 15. Repairs. Splashdown Water Slide Agreement Page 7 of 10 DRAFT A. Throughout the term of this Agreement, Splashdown shall at its own cost and without any expense to the City, keep and maintain the Premises in good, neat, and sanitary order. This includes all buildings and improvements of every kind which may be a part thereof including all appurtenances thereto, including sidewalks adjacent thereto. The City shall not be obligated to make any repairs, replacements, or renewals of any kind, nature, or description whatsoever to the Premises, or any buildings or improvements thereon. B. Splashdown shall control all rodents and other pests that may be on or in the Premises during the term of this Agreement. C. Splashdown shall provide trash and garbage receptacles and have refuse removed from the Premises on a regular basis. D. Splashdown shall remain in compliance with all applicable laws and regulations of the Spokane Regional Health Department. Section 16. Insolvency or Bankruptcy - If Splashdown becomes insolvent, voluntarily or involuntarily bankrupt, or if a receiver, assignee or other liquidating officer is appointed for the business of Splashdown, then the City may terminate this Agreement. Section 17. Employees - Splashdown shall conduct a background check on all employees working at the water slide or any concessions operated on the Premises. Section 18. Liens - Splashdown shall keep the Premises free and clear from all mechanics' and materialmens' and other liens from work or labor done or services performed in any way arising out of the use of the Premises by Splashdown. Section 19. Ownership of Improvements. — All improvements and equipment placed on the Premises by Splashdown shall be and remain the property of Splashdown, and the City shall have no interest therein except as provided hereinafter. Section 20. Non -Liability of City for Theft, Burglary or Vandalism - The City shall not be liable in any manner for any loss, injury, or damage incurred by Splashdown from any acts of theft, burglary, or vandalism. Splashdown shall be responsible for providing all expenditures relating to any security precaution that Splashdown deems necessary or appropriate for the safety of the personnel, guests, employees, patrons, or users of the premises, or property of Splashdown located on the Premises. Splashdown shall implement security measures sufficient to secure the Premises after hours and prevent unauthorized use. Section 21. Relationship of the Parties. A. The Parties intend that an independent contractor relationship will be created by this Agreement. The City is interested in only the results to be achieved, and the conduct and control of the services will lie solely with Splashdown. Splashdown will be Splashdown Water Slide Agreement Page 8 of 10 DRAFT solely and entirely responsible for its acts and the acts of its agents, employees, servants, sub -lessee or otherwise during the performance of this Agreement. B. No agency, employment or partnership is created by this Agreement. Splashdown's business is separate and apart from that conducted by the City. Neither Party will have authority to act for the other in any obligations or expenses whatsoever of the other Party. Section 22. Venue Stipulation - This Agreement has been made and delivered within the State of Washington, and shall be governed by the laws of the State of Washington, both as to interpretation and performance. Any action at law, suit in equity, or judicial proceeding for the enforcement of this Agreement or any provision hereof shall be instituted and maintained only in Spokane County Superior Court. Section 23. Assignment - Each Party to this Agreement binds themselves, their partners, successors, executors, administrators, and assigns to the other Party of this Agreement and to the Party's successors, executors, administrators and assigns of each other Party with respect to all terms, conditions and covenants set forth herein. Splashdown may not assign, transfer in whole or in part its interest in this Agreement without the same being first authorized by motion of the City Council. A decision by the City Council to provide consent or denial shall be communicated to Splashdown within a reasonable time frame, not to exceed 30 calendar days of written request. The City Council's decision shall be made considering, among other factors, the financial stability, experience in operating/owning water slides and related recreational facilities, and the ability to meet conditions within this Agreement. In the event of an assignment, the assignee shall assume all liability of the assignor. Any unauthorized voluntary assignment or sub -lease shall be void, and shall terminate this lease at the City's option. Section 24. Waiver - No officer, employee, or agent of the City has the power, right or authority to waive any of the conditions or provisions of this Agreement. The waiver of any breach of this Agreement shall not be held to be a waiver of any other or subsequent breach. All remedies afforded in this Agreement or at law shall be taken and construed as being in addition to every other remedy provided herein or by law. The failure of the City to enforce at any time any of the provisions of this Agreement or to require at any time performance by Splashdown of any of the provisions hereof, shall be in no way construed to be a waiver of such provisions, nor any way affect the validity of this Agreement or any part hereof or the right of the City to thereafter enforce each and every such provision. Section 25. Modification - There shall be no modification of this Agreement, except in writing, executed with the same formalities of this present instrument. Section 26. Severability. A. It is understood and agreed by the Parties that if any part, term, or provision of this Agreement is held by the Court to be illegal, the validity of the remaining portions or Splashdown Water Slide Agreement Page 9 of 10 DRAFT provisions shall not be affected, and the rights and obligations of the Parties shall be construed and enforced as if this Agreement did not contain a particular part, term, or provision held to be invalid. B. If it should appear that any part, term, or provision hereof is in conflict with any statutory provisions of Washington, then the part, term, or provision hereof which may conflict shall be deemed void insofar as it may be in conflict, and be deemed to modify the Agreement to conform to such statutory provisions. Section 27. Time of the Essence - Time is of the essence regarding each and every provision of this Agreement. Section 28. All Writing Contained Herein - This Agreement contains all the terms and conditions agreed upon by the Parties. No other understandings, oral or otherwise, regarding the subject matter of this Agreement shall be deemed to exist or to bind any of the Parties. In the event any language in an attachment which has been made part of this Agreement conflicts or appears to conflict with this document, it is expressly agreed by the Parties that this written Agreement shall control in the resolution of any such disputes. Section 29. Exhibits — A. Insurance certificates. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the PARTIES have caused this Agreement to be executed on the date and year set forth above. CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY: SPLASH -DOWN CONCESSIONS, INC.: Mark Calhoun, City Manager Name Title: Tax ID No. Approved as to form: Approved as to form: Office of the City Attorney Counsel for Splash -Down Concessions, Inc. Splashdown Water Slide Agreement Page 10 of 10 To: From: Re: DRAFT ADVANCE AGENDA as of May 24, 2018; 9:50 a.m. Please note this is a work in progress; items are tentative Council & Staff City Clerk, by direction of City Manager Draft Schedule for Upcoming Council Meetings June 5, 2018, Study Session, with action items 6:00 p.m. [due Tue May 291 ACTION ITEMS: 1. PUBLIC HEARING: Proposed 2019-2024 TIP — Colin Quinn -Hurst 2. Resolution 18-003 Adopting 2019-2024, Six -Year TIP — Colin Quinn -Hurst 3. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) 4. First Reading Ordinance 18-12 CTA 0002, Hotel/Motel in Industrial Zone — M.Palaniuk 5. Motion Consideration: BUILD Grant — Adam Jackson 6. Motion Consideration: Splashdown Contract — Cary Driskell NON -ACTION ITEMS: 7. Retail Recruitment Plan — Chaz Bates 8. Sullivan and Wellesley Intersection Improvement — Erica Amsden, Gloria Mantz 9. Code Enforcement Update — Rachelle McFetridge; Greg Baldwin 10. Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins June 12, 2018, Formal 6 pm Meeting cancelled (10 minutes) (10 minutes) (5 minutes) (10 minutes) (10 minutes) (10 minutes) (20 minutes) (20 minutes) (20 minutes) (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting: 120 mins] June 12, 2018, Special Meeting, Budget Workshop (8:30 a.m. — 3:30 p.m.) [due Tue June 51 June 19, 2018, Study Session, with action items 6:00 p.m. ACTION ITEMS: 1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) 2. Second Reading Ordinance 18-012 CTA 0002, Hotel/Motel in Industrial Zone — M.Palaniuk NON -ACTION ITEMS: 3. ITS/SRTMC Discussion — John Hohman, Ray Wright, and Becky Spangle of WSDOT 4. BNSF 2nd Rail Project Update — Bill Helbig, John Hohman 5. Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins due Tue June 12 (5 minutes) (15 minutes) (30 minutes) (15 minutes) (5 minutes) 6. Info Only: Department Reports (normally due for the June 26 meeting) [*estimated meeting: 70 mins] June 26, 2018, Formal 6:00 p.m. Meeting cancelled June 26-29, 2018: AWC Annual Conference, Yakima, WA July 3, 2018, Study Session, 6:00 p.m. ACTION ITEM: 1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) 2. Motion Consideration: Bid Award: Argonne Rd Preser.Project, Broadway to Indiana 3. Motion Consideration: Sullivan & Wellesley Intersection Improvement — E.Amsden, NON -ACTION ITEM: 4. Sullivan Bridge Project Completion — Erica Amsden, Gloria Mantz 5. Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins July 10, 2018, Formal meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. 1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) 2. Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins [due Tue June 261 (5 minutes) — G. Mantz (15 min) G.Mantz (10 min) (15 minutes) (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting: 50 mins] [due MON July 21 (5 minutes) (5 minutes) Draft Advance Agenda 5/24/2018 1:39:57 PM Page 1 of 3 August 7, 2018 Meeting Cancelled — National Night Out July 17, 2018, Study Session, 6:00 p.m. 1. Council Goals/Priorities for Lodging Tax — Chelsie Taylor 2. Advance Agenda - Mayor Higgins July 24, 2018, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. 1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) 2. Admin Report: Quarterly Police Department Report — Chief Werner 3. Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins 4. Info Item: Department Reports fdue Tue July 101 (15 minutes) (5 minutes) [due Tue July 17] (5 minutes) (10 minutes) (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting: mins] July 31, 2018, Study Session, 6:00 p.m. 1. Motion Consideration: Council Goals/Priorities For Lodging Tax — Chelsie Taylor 2. Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins August 14, 2018, Formal meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. 1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) 2. Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins August 21, 2018, Study Session, 6:00 p.m. 1. Estimated Revenues & Expenditures 2019 Budget — Chelsie Taylor 2. Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins August 28, 2018, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. 1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) 2. Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins 3. Info Item: Department Reports fdue Tue July 241 (15 minutes) (5 minutes) fdue Tue Aug 71 (5 minutes) (5 minutes) fdue Tue Aug 141 (20 minutes) (5 minutes) [due Tue Aug 211 (5 minutes) (5 minutes) Sept 4, 2018, Study Session, 6:00 p.m. [due Tue Aug 281 1. Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins (5 minutes) Sept 11, 2018, Formal meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. 1. PUBLIC HEARING #1: 2019 Revenues including Property Taxes — Chelsie Taylor 2. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes; motion to set Oct 9 budget hearing) 3. Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins fdue Tue Sept 41 (15 minutes) (5 minutes) (5 minutes) Sept 18, 2018, Study Session, 6:00 p.m. [due Tue Sept 111 1. Admin Report: Proposed Ordinance Adopting 2019 Property Taxes — Chelsie Taylor (10 minutes) 2. Outside Agencies Presentations (Economic Dev & Social Services combined) — Chelsie Taylor — 90 minutes 3. Advance Agenda - Mayor Higgins (5 minutes) Sept 25, 2018, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. 1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) 2. City Manager Presentation of 2019 Preliminary Budget — Mark Calhoun 3. Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins 4. Info Item: Department Reports [due Tue Sept 18] (5 minutes) (45 minutes) (5 minutes) Oct 2, 2018, Study Session, 6:00 p.m. fdue Tue Sept 25 1. Budget Amendment, 2018 — Chelsie Taylor (10 minutes) Draft Advance Agenda 5/24/2018 1:39:57 PM Page 2 of 3 2. Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins Oct 9, 2018, Formal meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. 1. PUBLIC HEARING #2: 2019 Budget — Chelsie Taylor 2. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) 3. First Reading Ordinance 18- , Property Tax — Chelsie Taylor 4. Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins Oct 16, 2018, Study Session, 6:00 p.m. 1. Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins Oct 23, 2018, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. 1. PUBLIC HEARING: 2018 Budget Amendment — Chelsie Taylor 2. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) 3. Second Reading Ordinance 18- , Property Tax — Chelsie Taylor 4. First Reading Ordinance 18 -,adopting 2018 Budget Amendment — Chelsie Taylor 5. First Reading Ordinance 18- , adopting 2019 Budget — Chelsie Taylor 6. Motion Consideration: Outside Agency Allocation of Funds — Chelsie Taylor 7. Admin Report: Quarterly Police Department Report — Chief Werner 8. Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins 9. Info Item: Department Reports *time for public or Council comments not included OTHER PENDING AND/OR UPCOMING ISSUES/MEETINGS: Animal Control Regulations (SVMC 7.30) Camping in RVs Donation Recognition Duplex Density Electrical Inspections Governance Manual Legislative Remote Testimony (Chambers) LTAC/Council Jt Mtg (Aug?) Naming City Facilities Protocol Neighborhood Restoration Program Police Dept. Quarterly Rpt (April, July, Oct, Jan) Police Precinct Lease Renewal (Nov '18) Sign Ordinance Street Addressing Standard St. Illumination (ownership, cost, location) St. O&M Pavement Preservation Tobacco 21 Resolution Utility Facilities in ROW (5 minutes) due Tue Oct 21 (20 minutes) (5 minutes) (10 minutes) (5 minutes) [due Tue Oct 91 (5 minutes) [due Tue Oct 161 (10 minutes) (5 minutes) (10 minutes) (10 minutes) (10 minutes) (20 minutes) (10 minutes) (5 minutes) Draft Advance Agenda 5/24/2018 1:39:57 PM Page 3 of 3 Mark Werner Chief of Police Spokane Valley Police Department Accredited Since 2011 Services provided in partnership with the Spokane County Sherds Office and the Community, Dedicated to Your Safety. Ozzie Knezovich Sheriff TO: Mark Calhoun, City Manager FROM: Mark Werner, Chief of Police DATE: May 21, 2018 RE: Monthly Report April 2018 In August 2016, we switched from UCR to NIBRS classification, which means we went from reporting based on a hierarchy to reporting all the crimes for each incident. Consequently, comparing crime statistics before August 2016 to crime statistics after that timeframe is not recommended using the data provided in the attached charts and graphs. ADMINISTRATIVE: In early April, Chief Werner attended the swearing in of a lateral transfer, Deputy Paul Ouimette, who previously worked as an Eastern Washington University Police Officer. Later that day, Chief Werner attended a Community Stakeholder Session at Spokane Valley Tech. Spokane Valley Fire Chief Bryan Collins invited Chief Werner to participate in a session to support their Strategic Planning process. The process included gathering input about the community's current expectations and concerns, as well as identifying the community's priorities regarding programs and services provided by the Spokane Valley Fire Department. In mid-April, Chief Werner attended the "hand off' meeting for the new Spokane Communications Entity (SPOCOM) as well as the first board meeting where there was a review of draft by-laws and draft executive director job competencies. At the end of April, there was a second meeting of the board to follow up on the initial actions items to create by-laws, levels of service, new executive director hire, and other miscellaneous items. The quarterly Spokane Regional Safe Streets Task Force Board Meeting was held in mid-April, which Chief Werner and other command staff from the Spokane County Sheriff's Office attended. Page 1 In late April, the Greater Spokane Rotary, represented by President Heather Schilling, presented to Chief Werner a new flag to be flown at the Valley Precinct. The Spokane Valley Police Department is very appreciative of the support given by the Spokane Rotary to the precinct by way of furnishing a new flag each time one is needed to replace an aging flag. A small ceremony was held to retire the aging flag and replace it with the new flag. Our thanks to this organization for their continued support. The Spokane Regional Law and Justice Council (SRLJC) provided Government Alliance for Racial Equity (GARE) training in late April, specifically aimed at department heads and leaders in the use and implementation of a Racial Equity toolkit in each organization. This training was brought forward by the Racial Equity Subcommittee and was a follow-on from the Glenn Harris meeting held at the SRLJC in March 2015. SHERIFF'S COMMUNITY ORIENTED POLICING EFFORT (SCOPE): In the month of April, S.C.O.P.E. participated in: • Valley Chamber of Commerce Breakfast • S.C.O.P.E. Basic Training- seven new volunteers • Senior Resource Fair at CenterPlace • Moving Forward S.C.O.P.E. Regional Meetings • East Valley Community Coalition Meeting Underage Drinking/Drug Prevention • GSSAC Coalition Meeting, and • Operation Family ID April 2018 Volunteers Hours per Station *Includes estimated volunteer service hours that are provided in the City of Spokane Valley. These two locations cover both Spokane Valley and the unincorporated portion of the county. Location # Volunteers Admin Hours L.E. Hours Total Hours Central Valley 7 53 49 102 East Valley* 29 308 402 710 Edgecliff 7 198 18 216 Trentwood 5 129 88.5 217.5 University 26 529.5 140.5 670 West Valley* 21 453.5 92 545.5 TOTALS 95 1,671 790 2,461 Volunteer Value ($30.46 per hour) $74,962.06 for April 2018 S.C.O.P.E. Incident Response Team (SIRT) volunteers contributed 10 on -scene hours (including travel time) in April, responding to crime scenes, motor vehicle accidents and providing traffic control; all the hours were for incidents specifically in Spokane Valley. There were two special events in April; one event was in Spokane Valley, the Rapid Rabbit at East Valley High School Area, where traffic control was provided. Total April volunteer hours contributed by SIRT, including training, stand-by, response and special events is 1,253; total for 2018 is 4,351. (Starting January 2018, a Page 2 change is being made in how actual hours of `stand-by' time is calculated. Due to the shortage of staff necessary to cover up to 62 shifts of 24 hours per day per month, a simple formula as used in the past, no longer reflects the actual time spent on stand-by. Now, we will count each month the actual time members sign up for duty minus the time actually spent on -scene.) Abandoned Vehicles SCOPE DISABLED PARKING ACTIVITY REPORT February March April Tagged for Impounding 31 30 24 Cited/Towed 8 6 8 Hulks Processed 5 19 12 Total Vehicles Processed 98 114 88 Yearly Total of Vehicles Processed 216 330 418 SCOPE DISABLED PARKING ACTIVITY REPORT City of Spokane Valley # of Vol. # of Vol. # of Hrs. # of Disabled Infractions Issued # of Warnings Issued # of Non - Disabled Infractions Issued January 0 0 0 0 0 February 0 0 0 0 0 March 1 3.5 1 3 0 April 1 3 0 2 0 YTD Total 2 6.5 1 5 0 Spokane County # of Vol. # of Hrs. # of Disabled Infractions Issued # of Warnings Issued # of Non - Disabled Infractions Issued January 1 11.5 1 11 0 February 3 24 7 13 0 March 3 34.5 11 16 0 April 2 21.5 2 5 0 YTD Total 9 91.5 21 45 0 OPERATIONS: Convicted Felon Arrested after Accidentally Shooting Himself: In early April, Spokane Valley Deputies responded to a shooting call in the 6900 block of E. rd Ave. in Spokane Valley. Their investigation revealed a convicted felon who cannot legally possess a firearm had accidentally shot himself in the leg. No one else was injured, the handgun was recovered, and, after receiving medical attention, the male was arrested and booked into jail. In early April, at approximately Page 3 3:15 a.m., Spokane Valley Deputies responded to a shooting call at a residence located in the 6900 block of E. 2nd Ave. Responding deputies were told a male at the location accidentally shot himself in the leg. Deputy Travis West, familiar with the residence from previous contacts, arrived and contacted a 21 -year-old male in the basement of the home. The male had a wound to his lower leg and was receiving first-aid from two subjects. Deputies provided medical attention until they were relieved by Spokane Valley Fire and AMR personnel. The male suspect said an "unknown person" came downstairs, shot him in the leg and left with the gun, contradicting what deputies had been previously told, that the male had accidently shot himself. During the investigation, Deputy Nathan Booth located the firearm, a Lorcin .380 pistol, under a tarp on a picnic table in the backyard. A check of the firearm's serial number showed it had not been reported stolen. Additional information received by deputies confirmed the original report that the male had accidently shot himself in the leg. A check of the male's name and criminal history showed he had been convicted of attempted Robbery 2nd Degree and Assault 2nd Degree, both serious felonies, which legally preclude him from possessing a firearm. The male suspect was transported to a local hospital for additional medical treatment. Upon his release, he was arrested and transported to the Spokane County Jail where he was booked for Unlawful Possession of a Firearm 1st Degree. Detectives Seek Information Regarding Armed Robbery: Spokane Valley Major Crimes Detectives would like anyone with information regarding the armed robbery of a Spokane Valley business. Major Crimes Detectives are investigating the robbery of Piece of Mind, a business located at 12101 E. 1st Street, which occurred in late March, and would like to talk to anyone who has information regarding potential suspects or noticed anything suspicious between 9:00 p.m. and 10:00 p.m. in that area. In late March, at approximately 9:50 p.m., Spokane Valley Deputies were called to a reported armed robbery at Piece of Mind. The employee stated he was in the process of closing the store when two adult males entered. One of the suspects had a knife in his hand and demanded the employee get down on the ground. The suspects bound the employee's hands, took the money from the cash register and paraphernalia (glass pipes etc.) from the display case, and fled south from the store on foot. The employee, who was not injured, freed himself and called 911. Suspect #1 was described as approximately 6'02" with a thin build wearing a hooded sweatshirt, a bandana covering his face, gloves and jeans. Suspect #2 was described as approximately 6'02" with a thin build wearing a hooded sweatshirt, a bandana covering his face, gloves and jeans. Deputies immediately set up a perimeter while Deputy Hunt and his partner K9 Gunnar arrived and conducted a search. Unfortunately, the suspects were not located. Anyone with information regarding this crime, or observed anything suspicious in the immediate area around the timeframe of crime, is asked to call Detective Darin Staley at 509-477-3160. Attempting to Identify these Females: Spokane Valley Major Crimes Detectives are attempting to identify two females who were involved in a robbery at Walmart. One of the females told a store employee she would stab her in the neck if she said anything during the theft. In early April, at approximately 1:20 p.m., Spokane Valley Deputies responded to a reported robbery at a Walmart located at 5025 E. Sprague in Spokane Valley. A loss prevention employee said he observed the two females at a self -scan register. They appeared to scan one item and then placed several in the shopping bags. The register signaled that items had not been scanned properly and locked, requiring a clerk's attention. When the females were told the items did not scan properly, one of the females stated she had more shopping to do. She removed the items from the bag and placed them back in the shopping cart. One female pushed the cart down the aisle while the second exited the store and returned to their vehicle. A second employee watched the female with the cart walk up to another Page 4 check stand and place the items from her cart into plastic shopping bags. The employee planned to approach the female, but the female looked at her and said something to the effect of, "If you say anything, I will stab you in the neck." Fearing for her safety, the employee did not approach the female suspect who walked out of the store with the stolen merchandise. The females arrived in a silver, four - door car, possibly an early 2000's Chevrolet Malibu. If you can help identify the females or provide any information regarding this investigation, you are urged to contact Detective Darin Staley at 509- 477-2573, reference #10046382. SVIU Detectives Obtain a Search Warrant for Two Residences; Three Arrested as Investigation Continues: Spokane Valley Investigative Unit (SVIU) Detectives, with the assistance of SWAT Team members, executed a search warrant, which resulted in the arrest of two suspects for possession of stolen property and one for a felony warrant. This investigation remains active and additional charges/arrests are expected. In mid-April, SVIU Detective Jeff Thurman obtained a search warrant for two residences, one in the 1300 block of S. Ray and a second in the 1600 block of W. Toni Rae Drive. At approximately 10:00 p.m., SVIU Detectives, assisted by the Sheriff's Office SWAT Team with Air 2 overhead, executed the search warrant at the residence on W. Toni Rae Drive. Multiple subjects were detained, but two defiantly remained inside the residence despite multiple attempts by HNT negotiators to make contact and PA announcements/ commands to surrender. After several hours, SWAT Team members, including Sheriff's Office and Spokane Police Department K9s, entered the residence and located a 39 -year-old male suspect and 32 -year-old female suspect. During the evening/early morning hours, the search warrant was also served on the residence on S. Ray. As a result of this investigation, two stolen trailers, a 2011 Salem Cruise and a 2008 Eclipse Attitude Toy Hauler, were recovered. The trailers were reported stolen from a Spokane Valley business on March 12, 2018, and had a total estimated value of over $35,000. The male suspect, a five -time convicted felon (Theft of a Motor Vehicle (2 counts), Identity Theft, Forgery and Theft of a Firearm), was booked into the Spokane County Jail for two counts of Possession of Stolen Property 2nd Degree. The female suspect, a two-time convicted felon (Possession of Stolen Property and Possession of Controlled Substance), was booked into the Spokane County Jail for two counts of Possession of Stolen Property 2nd Degree and two felony warrants (Theft of a Motor Vehicle and Bail Jumping). Detectives seized property/vehicles/evidence and this investigation is ongoing with additional charges/arrests expected in the future. Also arrested at the Toni Rae Drive location was a 31 -year-old male suspect who was booked into the Spokane County Jail for an unrelated felony warrant for Possession of a Controlled Substance. Stemming from this active investigation, Spokane Valley Investigative Unit (SVIU) Detectives developed probable cause to request and obtain a search warrant for two additional residences the following weekend. Detectives recovered a large amount of suspected stolen property (estimated over $100,000), along with drugs, a firearm and ammunition. In mid-April, SVIU Detectives executed a search warrant for two residences in connection to this investigation. Detective Jeff Thurman requested and obtained a search warrant for two residences located in the 100 block of E. Mission. No arrests were made at the time of the warrant service; however, detectives seized a firearm, 80 rounds of ammunition, a Counterfeit $100 bill, small amounts of Heroin and Methamphetamine, 25 pounds of harvested Marijuana and a large amount of suspected stolen property. The recovered property, which has an estimated value over $100,000, filled four pickup trucks and two SUVs. Detectives continue to unravel this criminal web of activity as they work to identify the victims of the stolen property recovered, which includes two victims of burglaries into Latah County, Idaho. Several additional charges/arrests are expected as this investigation continues. To date, during this investigation, detectives have made three arrests, recovered over $140,000 in Page 5 property and seized six firearms, numerous magazines, over 8,000 rounds of ammunition, and multiple additional firearms parts and optics. They have also seized a large amount of Heroin along with Methamphetamine, Cocaine, Marijuana and over 300 pills. Social Media Threats NEVER a Joke: Spokane Valley Deputies arrested a middle school student after receiving information about a Snapchat message he sent, along with a picture of a firearm, where he threatened a school shooting the next day. The 11 -year-old male was cooperative and stated the post was meant as a `joke.' The pictured firearm was later determined to be a BB gun rifle. In mid-April, at approximately 9:30 p.m., Spokane Valley Deputy Veronica Van Patten began to investigate a threat of school shooting made on social media. Deputy Van Patten learned the original Snapchat threat was sent by the suspect to another middle school student. The concerned student replayed the message for the alarmed youth group leader who reported it to the youth group's adult leader. Due to the Snapchat platform settings, the message automatically deleted within seconds after it was viewed, but there was an option to `replay' the message one time. The witnesses explained the message stated, "There's going to be a school shooting tomorrow. Tell your Mama. Psych." and was sent with a picture of a rifle -style firearm. Deputy Van Patten contacted the suspect who was accompanied by his legal guardian. The suspect stated he knew why Deputy Van Patten was there and was cooperative during the interview. He explained he sent a Snapchat to five friends stating "There is going to be a school shooting tomorrow. Psych.", along with a picture of his neighbor's BB gun rifle. He said he meant it as a `joke,' but two of his friends replied to the message saying it was messed up and the cops are coming. He said he apologized to both friends and realized afterward he had made a bad decision. The juvenile was arrested and transported to the Spokane County Juvenile Detention Facility where he was charged with Threats to Bomb or Injure Property, a felony. Sheriff Knezovich stated, "Spokane County will have a zero -tolerance policy for making threats toward shooting up a school or classmates and if you make such threats, we will arrest you." Central Valley School District Officials and the Spokane Valley Resource Deputy were advised of this information and investigation. We ask parents of school -aged students to talk with their children about social media and know what applications they are using. Some of these apps, such as Snapchat, make it nearly impossible to monitor activities as they delete posts/messages automatically. Other apps are designed to look harmless, but enable pictures/screenshots to be hidden or locked from view without secretly entering a password. It is up to each parent how they raise their children, which includes the use of social media. Please be aware of these apps and technologies specifically designed to be secret. The entire world can be accessed from a smartphone, tablet or computer, all of which have photo and video capabilities. Washington RCW 9.61.160: Threats to bomb or injure property—Penalty. (1) It shall be unlawful for any person to threaten to bomb or otherwise injure any public or private school building, any place of worship or public assembly, any governmental property, or any other building, common carrier, or structure, or any place used for human occupancy; or to communicate or repeat any information concerning such a threatened bombing or injury, knowing such information to be false and with intent to alarm the person or persons to whom the information is communicated or repeated. (2) It shall not be a defense to any prosecution under this section that the threatened bombing or injury was a hoax. (3) A violation of this section is a class B felony punishable according to chapter 9A.20 RCW. Page 6 Convicted Felon's Suspicious Attempts to Avoid Contact Fail: A 17 -time convicted felon's suspicious attempts to avoid contact ended in his arrest and the recovery of a stolen firearm. In mid-April, at approximately 10:45 p.m., Spokane Valley Deputy Skye Ortiz observed a blue Ford Crown Victoria with what appeared to be a damaged windshield, pulling up to the gas pumps at HICO, located on the corner of Sprague and Mullan. Planning to contact the driver for the violation, Deputy Ortiz drove around the block. He observed the 34 -year-old male driver exit the still running vehicle and enter the store. As Deputy Ortiz pulled closer to record the license plate, he observed the male suspect walking east from the store, rounded the corner of the building and walked into the laundromat where he remained. The suspect continued to stare at the patrol car and although lacking any laundry, remained in a laundromat while leaving his unattended vehicle running at the gas pumps. Deputy Ortiz left the immediate area to a position where he could continue to observe the suspect's suspicious behavior. Several minutes later, the male suspect exited the laundromat, looked around in the direction of the parked patrol car and made a call on his cell phone. He remained in view as he sat down on an outside bench. At approximately 11:00 p.m., the suspect stood up and walked northbound on Willow, away from the location, leaving his still running and unattended vehicle. Due to the suspect's highly suspicious behavior, Deputy Ortiz pulled on Willow to contact him, where he observed him getting into a Ford Mustang. The Mustang, occupied by two people in addition to the suspect, drove south on Willow to Sprague where Deputy Ortiz conducted a traffic stop. The male suspect was contacted, identified and removed from the vehicle to continue the investigation into his suspicious actions. The suspect began reaching in his pockets and was detained in handcuffs. During a frisk for weapons, Deputy Ortiz located an illegal switchblade style knife in the suspect's back pocket and informed him he was under arrest for possession of a dangerous weapon. Sgt. Simmons, who had arrived to assist, checked the vehicle that the suspect had abandoned and observed a pistol in a black holster sitting on the driver's seat. After being advised of his rights, the suspect initially denied even driving the vehicle, but eventually said he borrowed it from a friend. He also admitted his fingerprints might be on the pistol because he pushed everything in the seat to the side when he borrowed the car, but denied any actual knowledge of a firearm. A check of the suspect's criminal history revealed he is a 17 -time convicted felon (possession of a controlled substance w/o prescription, burglary 2nd degree, possession of stolen property and theft 1st degree) and prohibited from possessing firearms. The vehicle, which contained additional possibly stolen property, was seized, pending a search warrant. The pistol, a Glock G43 9mm, was later determined to have been reported stolen during a vehicle prowl in March of this year. The male suspect was transported and booked into the Spokane County Jail for Unlawful Possession of a Firearm, Possession of a Stolen Firearm, Possession of a Dangerous Weapon and Driving While Suspended 3rd Degree. After his initial court appearance, his bond was set at $25,000. Suspicious Behavior Advisory: The Spokane Valley Police Department would like parents to be aware of an incident reported in mid-April where a young female student observed a male while she walked to and from school last week. The male's suspicious behavior was concerning to the student, but his intentions are not known. Attempts to locate and identify this subject have not been successful and no similar incidents are known to have been reported. This advisory is to inform parents in the area of this information and to request anyone who has information regarding similar incidents or can help identify this male to call Crime Check at 50-456-2244, reference #10049317. As the student walked to school in the area of Evergreen and 26th, the male drove up in an older, small white four - door vehicle. The male asked if she had missed the bus since she appeared to be running and if she needed a ride. The student did a great job, declined the ride and continued her way to school. Later in the afternoon, as she walked home from school, she noticed the same male walking behind her near Evergreen and 24th. The male did not say anything or attempt to contact her, but after the morning's incident, she got a "creepy feeling" seeing the male again. A couple blocks later, a neighbor pulled Page 7 up and gave her a ride home. The male was described as being in his 50's or 60's, approximately 5'11" with medium build and balding with gray hair on the sides. The male was wearing shorts with a windbreaker -style jacket, which were orange and back in color. Although the male's reported actions are not criminal, his intentions are not known and were alarming to the young student. Deputies/Detectives would like to identify this male and talk to him about this incident. Anyone with information regarding this incident, has observed similar activity or can help identify this male is asked to call Crime Check at 509-456-2233, reference #10049317. Wanted Suspect Known to Flee, Fails to Heed K9 Warning: A wanted suspect, known to jump from a second story balcony and flee, did so again, but this time Deputy Kullman and K9 Khan were positioned at the back of the apartments to stop any escape attempt. In late April, at approximately 11:30 p.m., Spokane Valley Deputies responded to an apartment complex located in the 700 block of N. Argonne regarding a loud argument. Deputy Getchell, who had responded to the very same apartment earlier in his shift for a similar call, advised one of the persons involved was possibly a 35 -year-old male. This male suspect had a felony warrant for his arrest, had previously jumped from the second story balcony, and fled on foot when deputies responded. Hearing this, Deputy Kullman and K9 Khan took a position at the in the back of the apartments. A male and female could be heard inside the apartment arguing. Deputy Getchell knocked on the door, which was answered by the involved female. As Deputy Getchell entered the apartment, the male suspect looked at him and immediately turned and ran toward the slider door. Deputy Getchell ordered him to stop and warned a K9 was positioned behind the apartments to stop any escape, but the suspect ignored it all and jumped from the balcony to the ground. After the suspect hit the ground, Deputy Kullman used his flashlight to light up the male suspect and the area. Deputy Kullman told the male suspect to stop and warned of K9 Khan. The suspect looked right at the Deputy and K9, but ignored the commands and fled on foot as Deputy Kullman again announced himself, ordering the suspect to stop. Knowing the male suspect had a felony warrant for his arrest, coupled with his attempt to flee and failure to follow commands, Deputy Kullman sent K9 Khan who rapidly closed the distance, catching the suspect as he tried to scale a fence. Once on the ground, K9 Khan was removed, but the suspect, on his knees, remained defiant and would not follow commands to lay on the ground. Additional deputies arrived to assist and the suspect was taken into custody. He was provided medical treatment before being transported and booked into the Spokane County Jail for his felony warrant and a new charge or Obstructing. SWAT Team Successfully Arrests Wanted Suspect After He Refuses to Exit Residence: Spokane Valley SWAT Team members entered the residence of a defiant, wanted suspect and successfully took him into custody without anyone being injured. The 48 -year-old male suspect, who's been known to be armed and has made threats toward law enforcement, was transported and booked into the Spokane County Jail. In late April, at approximately 8:35 p.m., Spokane Valley Deputies responded to a residence located in the 7000 block of E. 6th Ave. for a report of a suspect with a warrant. Deputies learned the male suspect, who has made threats to harm law enforcement, was wanted for two counts of Possession of a Controlled Substance and believed to be inside the residence. At the location, deputies observed a male believed to be the suspect, inside the home and attempted to make contact. Several announcements made over the patrol vehicle's PA system went unanswered. Spokane Valley SWAT, Hostage Negotiation Team (HNT), and Spokane Valley Fire Rescue Task Force members were called to the scene. SCOPE SIRT Team volunteers also responded to assist with traffic control in the area. With the suspect continuing to ignore commands and failure to peacefully surrender, a search warrant for the residence was requested and obtained. After multiple Page 8 additional attempts to contact the male suspect were unsuccessful, SWAT Team members implemented their tactical plan and made entry into the residence. The suspect was located inside and safely taken into custody without injury. The male suspect was transported and booked into the Spokane County Jail for Possession of a Controlled Substance with Intent to Deliver (2 counts), Unlawful Use of a Building for Drug Purposes and Obstructing Law Enforcement. This conclusion was made possible by multiple teams and agencies who worked together, developing a well, thought- out plan and safely implementing that plan to end a dangerous situation with the arrest of the suspect without injury to him, citizens in the area, or law enforcement/fire personnel. Driver Traveling at 100mph on Sprague Listening to "Good Music" Attempts to Flee, Caught by K9 Bane: Spokane County Sheriff's K9 Deputy Clay Hilton, assisted by his partner K9 Bane, successfully caught and arrested a driver he initially tried to stop for driving at or over 100mph on Sprague near McDonald Rd. in Spokane Valley. K9 Bane was deployed to run down the driver who he fled on foot after a short pursuit. In late April, prior to 11:00 p.m., Deputy Hilton and K9 Bane were traveling west on Sprague near McDonald when Deputy Hilton noticed a black Volkswagen, eastbound. He estimated the Volkswagen's speed was at 100mph or more. Deputy Hilton activated his emergency lights and siren as he turned around to conduct a traffic stop of the vehicle. Instead of slowing or pulling over, the 19 -year-old male driver continued to drive recklessly and began to try and evade Deputy Hilton. As he approached Sullivan, the male suspect turned into the parking lot on the southwest corner. He accelerated through the bank's drive through lanes before turning south in the parking lot. The suspect then turned west behind the business, accelerated, drove between two dumpsters and onto a dirt walking trail. As additional Spokane Valley Deputies responded to the area to assist, the male suspect reached speeds of approximately 50mph on the dirt trail as he rapidly approached Progress Rd. and a dirt mound (Kelly Hump) used to prevent vehicle traffic from accessing the trail from Progress. The suspect did not stop, vaulting his vehicle over the mound. On the west side of Progress, he accelerated and attempted to drive over the dirt mound on the west side of Progress, but the vehicle became stuck. Not knowing if the suspect was armed or if he planned to continue his attempt to flee, Deputy Hilton exited his patrol vehicle with K9 Bane. The male suspect jumped out of the driver's door and began to run. Deputy Hilton identified himself, told the suspect he was under arrest and warned if he did not stop running, K9 Bane would be used to capture him. The suspect, continuing to make poor choices, continued to run. Deputy Hilton released K9 Bane who quickly covered ground and made contact with the suspect, bringing him to the ground. Deputy Hilton checked the vehicle to ensure no one was hiding inside and took control of K9 Bane while assisting deputies took the suspect into custody. The male suspect was provided medical attention prior to being transported and booked into the Spokane County Jail. After being advised of his rights, the male suspect said he didn't pull over because he was scared and thought he could get away. When asked why he was driving so recklessly and fast, he explained he was, "listening to good music and wanted to drive fast." The male suspect was booked into jail for Attempting to Elude a Police Vehicle and Obstructing/Resisting Arrest. Detectives Need Help Identifying Extremely Brazen Burglar: Spokane Valley Investigative Unit (SVIU) Detective Jeff Thurman was investigating a burglary where a female brazenly walked into a home, while the homeowners were in the back yard and their young son was inside watching TV, and stole items including credit cards and electronics. In late April, at approximately 11:05 a.m., Spokane Valley Deputies responded to a reported burglary at a residence located in the 14900 block of E. Broadway in Spokane Valley. The homeowners stated they were in the back yard when their young son, who was inside watching television, came to the back door and Page 9 yelled some lady was taking mom's purse. The victims ran through the house and out the front door in time to see a female getting in the back seat of an older white four -door car, possible a Mazda, and drive east. Deputies were told the female just opened the front door and walked into the residence. She told the young child she was there to babysit and walked back toward his parent's bedroom. She came out holding his mother's purse so he ran to the back door to call for his mom and dad. The victim's credit cards were used, or attempted to be used, at several locations. The picture of this female, who detectives are attempting to identify, was captured from surveillance video at one of those locations. At the time of the burglary, the victims stated there were two males waiting in the vehicle as the female got inside. The driver was described as a white male in his 20's with red hair and a beard. The passenger was described as a white male in his 20's, dark hair and heavy set. (The suspects continued their crime spree into the City of Spokane where they were arrested on theft and burglary charges; this Spokane Valley case was included in those for which the trio were arrested.) Spokane Sheriff's Regional Air Support Unit Proudly Announces the Addition of Search/Rescue/Fire Support Helicopter: The Spokane County Sheriff's Office Regional Air Support Unit (ASU) and its partners would like to announce the new addition of a Bell UH -1H Helicopter to its fleet. Named "Rescue 3," the helicopter will primarily be used for Search & Rescue, Fire Support/Suppression and greatly expand the capabilities of the ASU. The new capabilities of this heavy lift helicopter will enable ASU crews to lift victims to safety and eventually conduct water drops on fires quickly, potentially saving lives and preventing property damage. Also, with the partnership with both the Spokane Valley Fire Department and Spokane Fire Department, paramedics and their equipment will be part of Rescue 3's responding4#4.1111hal11101111 flight crew. This will enable them to be inserted directly into remote areas and quickly provide initial advanced medical treatment to injured rescue/fire victims. The Bell UH -1H Helicopter was acquired through the 1033 surplus program at no cost to the citizens of Spokane County. The Air Support Unit is proud of the extremely profession and safe level of service it provides while keeping operating costs low. This is done by utilizing civilian volunteer pilots, generous community support including free or low-cost maintenance/parts, and the utilization of the 1033 surplus program. In addition, the ASU applies for and receives Homeland Security grant funds for equipment. Since its inception in 2005, the Air Support Unit has a perfect safety record and is honored to be 1 of only 10 agencies in the United States to earn and maintain accreditation through the Airborne Law Enforcement Association. The Spokane County Sheriff's Regional Air Support Unit consists of three helicopters, two Bell OH -58's (Air 1 & Air 2) and the newest addition, the Bell UH -1H, Rescue 3. In addition to the civilian pilots, the Air Support Unit consists of personnel from the Spokane County Sheriff's Office, Page 10 Spokane Valley Police Department, Spokane Valley Fire Department, Spokane Police Department, Spokane Fire Department, Kootenai County Sheriff's Office, and Coeur d'Alene Police Department. *** We would also would like to recognize and thank River City Helicopters and CW Wraps for their help and generous donations to the Air Support Unit and Rescue 3. River City Helicopters donated a search light, rappelling kit and maintenance work. CW Wraps donated the graphics and design work. LOCK ITEMS IN YOUR TRUNK OBSERVE AND REPORT CARS SHOULD KEEP GARAGE NEVER RUN DOORS CLOSED UNATTENDED ******************** Page 11 Spokane County Sheriff's Office Regional Intelligence Group Spokane Valley Districts IBR Classification: Burglary Month Count Year 2015 2016 2017 Calendar 2018 January 84 72 56 51 February 66 73 54 26 March 71 78 42 33 April 68 87 50 34 May 69 73 47 June 86 93 59 July 103 89 51 August 86 103 56 September 94 91 78 October 105 71 37 November 80 92 32 December 81 63 33 Grand Total 993 985 595 144" * IBR Offense: Burglary/Breaking & Entering 220 Produced: 5/21/2018 For Law Enforcement Use Only This document is confidential and may not be further disseminated or released to any unauthorized persons pursuant to RCW 42.56.420 Spokane County Sheriff's Office Regional Intelligence Group Spokane Valley Districts IBR Classification: Murder NonNeg Manslaughter 2.5 2 1.5 1 • ■ * ■ 0.5 0 JANUARY FEBRUARY S V a 2 CC a > W > E- < z J In D a SEPTEMBER OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER X2015 2016 2017 Calendar 2018 Month Count Year 2015 2016 2017 Calendar 2018 January 1 February March 1 April May June July 1 1 August 1 September October 2 November 1 1 1 December 1 Grand Total 5 4 2 *IBR Offense: Murder/Non-Negligent Manslaughter 09A Produced: 5/21/2018 For Law Enforcement Use Only This document is confidential and may not be further disseminated or released to any unauthorized persons pursuant to RCW 42.56.420 Spokane County Sheriff's Office Regional Intelligence Group Spokane Valley Districts I BR Classification: Identity Theft Month Count Year 2015 2016 2017 Calendar 2018 January 9 20 February 1 23 17 March 21 13 April 16 22 May 32 June 18 July 23 August 9 13 September 7 17 October 7 15 November 10 19 December 8 26 Grand Total 42 232 72" *IBR Offense: Identity Theft 26F Produced: 5/21/2018 For Law Enforcement Use Only This document is confidential and may not be further disseminated or released to any unauthorized persons pursuant to RCW 42.56.420 Spokane County Sheriff's Office Regional Intelligence Group Spokane Valley Districts IBR Classification: Fraud Month Count Year 2015 2016 2017 Calendar 2018 January 12 23 26 70 February 18 17 36 46 March 20 21 37 60 April 18 15 43 55 May 24 8 53 June 14 19 57 July 17 26 61 August 28 15 53 September 24 16 66 October 34 41 64 November 18 38 54 December 25 30 43 Grand Total 252 269 593 231 * IBR Offense: Fraud - Credit Card/ATM 26B, Fraud - False Pretenses/Swindling/Con Games 26A, & Fraud - Impersonation 26C Produced: 5/21/2018 For Law Enforcement Use Only This document is confidential and may not be further disseminated or released to any unauthorized persons pursuant to RCW 42.56.420 Spokane County Sheriff's Office Regional Intelligence Group Spokane Valley Districts IBR Classification: DUI Month Count Year 2015 2016 2017 Calendar 2018 January 30 30 24 21 February 22 30 26 18 March 25 31 33 39 April 28 23 18 13 May 27 27 19 June 29 31 28 July 31 19 26 August 31 18 24 September 18 20 19 October 25 19 24 November 20 28 18 December 13 27 21 Grand Total 299 303 280 91 * IBR Offense: DUI 90D Produced: 5/21/2018 For Law Enforcement Use Only This document is confidential and may not be further disseminated or released to any unauthorized persons pursuant to RCW 42.56.420 Spokane County Sheriff's Office Regional Intelligence Group Spokane Valley Districts IBR Classification: Drugs Month Count Year 2015 2016 2017 Calendar 2018 January 2 5 19 44 February 3 30 38 March 2 2 30 63 April 4 1 37 55 May 1 6 23 June 2 2 20 July 3 1 21 August 4 16 26 September 5 28 25 October 4 20 24 November 1 20 38 December 3 27 25 Grand Total 31 131 318 200.. * IBR Offense: Drug Equipment Violations 35B & Drugs/Narcotics Violations 35A Produced: 5/21/2018 For Law Enforcement Use Only This document is confidential and may not be further disseminated or released to any unauthorized persons pursuant to RCW 42.56.420 Spokane County Sheriff's Office Regional Intelligence Group Spokane Valley Districts IBR Classification: Theft From Motor Vehicle Month Count Year 2015 2016 2017 Calendar 2018 January 134 101 98 77 February 124 76 102 33 March 96 72 94 79 April 62 134 131 62 May 84 108 79 June 68 177 107 July 85 139 96 August 92 131 70 September 109 103 118 October 112 124 70 November 92 153 54 December 110 118 70 Grand Total 1168 1436 1089 2511 * IBR Offense: Theft From Motor Vehicle 23F Produced: 5/21/2018 For Law Enforcement Use Only This document is confidential and may not be further disseminated or released to any unauthorized persons pursuant to RCW 42.56.420 Spokane County Sheriff's Office Regional Intelligence Group Spokane Valley Districts IBR Classification: Motor Vehicle Theft Month Count Year 2015 2016 2017 Calendar 2018 January 62 112 44 36 February 64 53 38 24 March 53 66 44 28 April 53 75 41 27 May 72 59 27 June 58 80 28 July 73 73 41 August 60 39 36 September 78 35 43 October 66 51 40 November 59 33 34 December 80 39 28 Grand Total 778 715 444 115; * IBR Offense: Motor Vehicle Theft 240 Produced: 5/21/2018 For Law Enforcement Use Only This document is confidential and may not be further disseminated or released to any unauthorized persons pursuant to RCW 42.56.420 Spokane County Sheriff's Office Regional Intelligence Group Spokane Valley Districts IBR Classification: Robbery Month Count Year 2015 2016 2017 Calendar 2018 January 11 3 3 6 February 9 7 6 2 March 12 8 7 5 April 6 3 3 6 May 6 8 2 June 5 5 1 July 8 5 4 August 7 3 1 September 15 2 4 October 7 10 4 November 3 10 3 December 11 3 1 Grand Total 100 67 39 19 * IBR Offense: Robbery 120 Produced: 5/21/2018 For Law Enforcement Use Only This document is confidential and may not be further disseminated or released to any unauthorized persons pursuant to RCW 42.56.420 Spokane County Sheriff's Office Regional Intelligence Group Spokane Valley Districts IBR Classification: Assault I 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 JANUARY FEBRUARY 1 0 a 2 > W > E- < z J In D a SEPTEMBER OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER X2015 2016 2017 Calendar 2018 Month Count Year 2015 2016 2017 Calendar 2018 January 157 131 97 99 February 141 140 95 67 March 138 145 78 112 April 131 142 90 94 May 151 143 93 June 140 115 93 July 143 123 96 August 136 63 73 September 130 81 92 October 149 99 88 November 124 97 86 December 127 88 85 Grand Total 1667 1367 1066 372 * IBR Offense: Aggravated Assault 13A & Simple Assault 13B Produced: 5/21/2018 For Law Enforcement Use Only This document is confidential and may not be further disseminated or released to any unauthorized persons pursuant to RCW 42.56.420 Spokane County Sheriff's Office Regional Intelligence Group Spokane Valley Districts IBR Classification: Theft Month Count Year 2015 2016 2017 Calendar 2018 January 233 240 205 242 February 240 208 199 172 March 258 215 213 207 April 239 232 204 201 May 227 194 235 June 239 263 252 July 259 242 237 August 264 203 224 September 247 222 213 October 227 232 238 November 193 244 218 December 278 225 199 Grand Total 2904 2720 2637 822. * IBR Offense: Theft - All Other 23H, Theft - Pocket -Picking 23A, Theft - Purse -Snatching 23B, Theft - Shoplifting 23C, Theft From Building 23D, Theft From Coin -Operated Machine 23E, & Theft of Motor Vehicle Parts/Accessories 23G Produced: 5/21/2018 For Law Enforcement Use Only This document is confidential and may not be further disseminated or released to any unauthorized persons pursuant to RCW 42.56.420 Spokane County Sheriff's Office Regional Intelligence Group Spokane Valley Districts IBR Classification: Rape Month Count Year 2015 2016 2017 Calendar 2018 January 7 7 8 17 February 10 7 2 3 March 6 9 3 8 April 10 8 7 5 May 9 12 9 June 5 9 1 July 5 5 6 August 13 2 5 September 3 4 2 October 14 5 8 November 9 6 1 December 8 4 3 Grand Total 99 78 55 33., *IBR Offense: Rape - Forcible 11A Produced: 5/21/2018 For Law Enforcement Use Only This document is confidential and may not be further disseminated or released to any unauthorized persons pursuant to RCW 42.56.420 Spokane County Sheriff's Office Regional Intelligence Group Spokane Valley Districts IBR Classification: Counterfeiting Forgery Month Count Year 2015 2016 2017 Calendar 2018 January 18 14 9 18 February 18 13 10 10 March 11 25 20 23 April 7 6 20 22 May 9 10 26 June 9 15 15 July 12 11 21 August 12 7 14 September 8 11 20 October 12 7 18 November 6 15 9 December 19 12 9 Grand Total 141 146 191 73, *IBR Offense: Counterfeiting/Forgery 250 Produced: 5/21/2018 For Law Enforcement Use Only This document is confidential and may not be further disseminated or released to any unauthorized persons pursuant to RCW 42.56.420 Spokane County Sheriff's Office Regional Intelligence Group Spokane Valley Districts IBR Classification: Destruction Damage Vandalism Month Count Year 2015 2016 2017 Calendar 2018 January 162 133 161 145 February 130 111 148 95 March 127 148 136 120 April 126 151 173 127 May 130 134 139 June 130 176 143 July 125 154 178 August 141 160 149 September 130 118 160 October 156 165 119 November 129 196 132 December 163 161 106 Grand Total 1649 1807 1744 487 IBR Offense: Destruction/Damage/Vandalism 290 Produced: 5/21/2018 For Law Enforcement Use Only This document is confidential and may not be further disseminated or released to any unauthorized persons pursuant to RCW 42.56.420