The URL can be used to link to this page

2018, 06-05 Study Session AGENDA SPOKANE VALLEY CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION FORMAT (with some action items) Tuesday,June 5,2018 6:00 p.m. CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10210 E Sprague Avenue (Please Silence Your Cell Phones During the Meeting) CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL ACTION ITEMS: 1. PUBLIC HEARING: Proposed 2019-2024 Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program(TIP)— Colin Quinn-Hurst [public comment] 2. Resolution 18-003 Adopting 2019-2024 Six Year Transportation Improvement Program(TIP)— Colin Quinn Hurst [no public comment] 3. CONSENT AGENDA: consists of items considered routine which are approved as a group. Any member of Council may ask that an item be removed from the Consent Agenda to be considered separately. Proposed Motion:I move to approve the Consent Agenda. a. Approval of claim vouchers on June 5,2018 Request for Council Action Form Total: $305,682.71 b. Approval of May 15,2018 Council Meeting Minutes, Study Session 4. First Reading Proposed Ordinance 18-012, Code Text Amendment,Hotel/Motel in Industrial Zone- Marty Palaniuk [public comment] 5. Motion Consideration: BUILD Grant—Adam Jackson [public comment] 6. Motion Consideration: Splashdown Contract—Cary Driskell [public comment] PUBLIC COMMENTS: This is an opportunity for the public to speak on any subject except those on this agenda as action items, which include numbers 1, 2, 4, 5, and 6 above, as public comments will be taken on those items at the time those items are discussed.When you come to the podium,please state your name and city residence for the record and limit remarks to three minutes. NON-ACTION ITEMS: DISCUSSION LEADER SUBJECT/ACTIVITY GOAL 7. Chaz Bates; and Bear Burnett of Retail Recruitment Plan Discussion/Information Retail Strategies 8. Erica Amsden, Gloria Mantz Sullivan and Wellesley Intersection Discussion/Information Improvement Project 9. Rachelle McFetridge,Nicole Code Enforcement Update Discussion/Information Montano, Greg Baldwin 10. Cary Driskell Hearing Examiner Services Discussion/Information 11.Mayor Higgins Advance Agenda Discussion/Information Study Session Agenda,June 5,2018 Page 1 of 2 12. Mayor Higgins Council Check in Discussion/Information 13. Mark Calhoun City Manager Comments Discussion/Information ADJOURN Study Session Agenda,June 5,2018 Page 2 of 2 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: June 5, 2018 Department Director Approval: ❑ Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ® public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Public Hearing: Draft 2019-2024 Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 35.77.010, Perpetual advanced six-year plans for coordinated transportation program expenditures. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Adopted 2018-2023 Six Year TIP on May 23, 2017, Resolution #17-011; Administrative Report on Draft 2019-2024 Six-Year TIP on May 15, 2018. BACKGROUND: The TIP is composed of transportation projects intended to be implemented in the next six years that address the transportation needs within the City of Spokane Valley. The City is required by RCW 35.77.010 to prepare and, after holding a public hearing, adopt a comprehensive transportation program for the ensuing six calendar years. This plan must be submitted to the Washington State Department of Transportation by June 30th of each year. The attached six-year TIP presents an integrated approach to project selection and phasing that have been aligned with recent master plans, upcoming redevelopment projects, economic development efforts, land use changes, and capital projects by partner agencies. Staff reviewed historical funding levels for federal, state and City funds to estimate projected funding levels available during the next six years. The six-year TIP is required to be financially constrained and reflect realistic expectations of annual funding levels. OPTIONS: Conduct Public Hearing RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Conduct Public Hearing BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: The City's match on federal and state funded projects is typically between 13.5% and 20%. Staff will coordinate with the Finance Department as projects identified in the TIP move forward and as grant opportunities become available to ensure local match requirements can be met. STAFF CONTACT: Colin Quinn-Hurst— Senior Transportation Planner Mike Basinger— Economic Development Manager ATTACHMENTS: 1) PowerPoint Presentation 2) Project Summary Sheets 2019-2024 Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program June 5, 2018 Colin Quinn-Hurst, Senior Transportation Planner Mike Basinger, AICP, Economic Development Manager SCTTl ikane p = Valley Transportation Improvement Program P ose: r r A "�Se urp u - Required by RCW 35.77.010 a _p+y Must be referenced in Com Plan y F Required for REET expenditures Y V' �' L4'1�- x6 gV r ' { �''� • Required for grant eligibility ' ''' = = Provides afinancially-constrained � � -.7::' _---...-- , , d-4,.. ,-�*. �� x {K projection c d✓ Transition to the 2019-2024 An integrated approach that aligns: / f - Master plans and studies, Upcoming redevelopment projects, Economic development efforts, ' � ` - Land use changes, - Stormwater projects, --.. . 4::,:::::::"----(-- - - Water district plans, and Capital projects by partner agencies. ,_ Intersection Improvement ProJjects .. v 5. Sullivan &Wellesley T - ,-- 26. Mirabeau& Mansfield 'ate'" �.Y. '. -a 19. Pines& Mission �- a.,a _ is . v /Assbn 1. Broadway&Argonne/Mullan ;ams 1 Brea ,°s;, ;f 15. Sprague& Barker s 18. 8th & Carnahan E .x-= c cl Z f 8 25 Pines& 16th05 44 7;111. , r st f . CA el,Cb , v 20. 8th & Barker 1y Barker Corridor Projects 24. Barker Road —Garland Ave to Trent Ave 6 EtWild - 11. Barker Road — Euclid Ave to Garland Ave 23. Barker Road —Spokane River to Euclid Ave - -%a 22. Barker Road —Appleway to 1-90 Interchange 21. Barker Road —South City Limits to Appleway r C C'7`._. Q:75 1.E Mks N ''`7 I Sidewalk and Trail Projects .. : .... . ., an . - . _ Wellesley M "7?. .+ a — 9. Wellesley Ave-McDonald to Evergreen -. Mfraheau Fulo 13. Wilbur Rd-Boone to Mission 8• Mission Ave-Union to Bowdish 111014 .M101:- ti,nsfleld Irxilaru Ki1ox /. M1410 " - 7. Wilbur Rd-Broadway to Boone 10. Knox Ave-Hutchinson to Sargent E3rnadwav T 12. Appleway Trail-Evergreen to Sullivan ''' V i E SpragLe �.. _ A..000',',14' . 4th '"---4.,6' - . ° 8th So 73 E_ D 0.25 0.5 I Miles 0 2tr, I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 2d /,.' 6 Reconstruction/ Preservation Projects ---1,_,- -J,-.1-.:_,A .;_2 .;.-A.iiv-vi,,, ,, - -.7r7f.,..7.1,..; __-.7_,,,_- ._ .‘ a '' °co b` �te .7:.,. rat r '„ zrn zji--------.7.-• $ Weiesie -ps ' , 'i, F ac o We ire - va11eY 1 m 4' �-.. uv'' 17. Argonne Rd—Indiana to Montgomery :-�<oC"" Euclid fN ira he a u + Eucho Euclid C y 16. Park Rd Reconstruction ^�r`gomen' Ma ns f ie 4d Krax y ludiana '®�_• ca0 Mlssi0 rl MI sion - .?'-g „ �&_ Sharp . A ._ - o ��„,„ 7., a6. Evergreen Rd—Mission Connector to Indiana H 14. Mullan Rd Preservation 5 TT .. a m - 8th 3r11, 4th 3 8th — 3 v w m 8th D. _ _ n s H sF '�� 16th say 4. Planned Preservation Projects(Fund 311): d 9 P 24th • University Rd—16th to Dishman Mica 24th w 25tBowdish Road—8th to 16th m 3a 4. 2019 Street PreservationP 3�na, 're ” • Broadway Ave.—Havana to Fancher (Street Wear Fee) Mission Ave.—Mullan to Bowdish .e yr - BeAeTerre • Indiana Ave.—Evergreen to Sullivan 37th - - i -'`7,4 . 1- • 8th Ave.—Various Locations \ 0 0 375 0.75 1 5 Miles to . .' r Grade J Separation Projects .,,,„..-L.r.'1.!STkce;c.p , -.,...c-... ...,,7.:,..',.. • , .. '7,.,., ,.: _.- . . . , . 0" Vc e" 2. Barker/ BNSF Grade Separation Project =f=r'x r. t .m . 3. Pines / BNSF Grade Separation Project _ BNa'`F Raitoad 1 1 1 1 1 I I I -- E uclid 4 254 500 ,".r FL tir.IIJ I . . . I , . . 1 Bridge Projects .„ 4 _ ,„ _____ _,____ 11 27. Argonne / 1-90 Interchange Bridge Widening K r F E- rr_li • t �_�,,.x +Mn�bae�Alum _ '._ � I'. .. m te. Spokane _ �~ t_ _ •_ _-4. _ -- o ksrana-. Val et' •.P,amlP r,,zix�c 1 ._-'` 1111 ..A J - - 4 c _ -7, 41.- - i 4 0 250 500 1,000 Feet 'i 'Iry Questions _ _ ___ , ,. _,..., ,,,___„,,_ __ _ _ _. i, ....--:..-...,:, . .. .. . .. I. .� , � nJ • ' .- ate . -. - . .may z ,_� . . ' • - . , �' ..•.� . .� #fit , ;i, •- 41. "n # a : i .` a ` 1 . Broadway @ Argonne/Mullan IntersectionsSpokane valley iiititb «y, ,F D o "�"" Broadway imir3 m i .411) rr " g 3 0 25 50 100 Feet 11111111i N 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Project Description: Reconstruct Broadway Avenue intersections at Argonne Road and Mullan Road in concrete to improve driving surface and maintenance. Phase: Construction Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering (PE): Right of Way (RW): Construction (CN): $12,000 Total Cost 2019-24: $12,000 City of Spokane Valley 2019-2024 Six-Year TIP 11 2. Barker Rd / BNSF Grade Separation Spokane valley i9�% _ 0.N.,4 _ t4. _ 41C .11V/ Adi lt 4r '' s , r. } .r vp ..0 ., ,, , ...,, ,14,0('77, ,- ,: ' , 0 50 100 200 Feet 't, IIIIIIIII N 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Project Description: Grade separate Barker Road from the BNSF Railway tracks and improve intersection at Trent Avenue (SR-290). Phase: Preliminary Engineering, Right of Way, and Construction Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering (PE): $1 ,459,000 Right of Way (RW): 1 ,340,000 Construction (CN): 21 ,309,000 Total Cost 2019-24: $24,110,000 2 I City of Spokane Valley 2019-2024 Six-Year TIP 3. Pines (SR-27) / BNSF Grade Separation Spokan�` valley �Cegt +0 r IF 5 M t P�reGo C) 0 100 200 400 Feet 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Project Description: Grade separate Pines Road from the BNSF Railway tracks and improve intersection at Trent Avenue (SR-290). Phase: Preliminary Engineering, Right of Way, and Construction Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering (PE): $2,135,000 Right of Way (RW): 4,200,000 Construction (CN): 22,065,000 Total Cost 2019-24: $28,400,000 City of Spokane Valley 2019-2024 Six-Year TIP 13 4. Street Preservation Projects - Annual r Spokane valley n Spokane Valley 8 = `-p - � py o Potential Road Segments Eligible for Pavement Preservation p 1 E >a 1 r1 ,e''' E �I (Based on 2017 PCI Data) _1 ._ _ i 7:111.....119 i ® �� 8 g b lives E�� J t I !iui _ tow o EE" , g &L Y P �1 m 3 ", 8. -.. N ex�.u. x� � L , g „...n,,,e — —ri'..' !!----e , r i IQ; ,,,,__,7:1,5r.„ .., ,, ,... , . ,,............ .. .,...,_. ..m., . n- Nil„", .,, „„ ,, ,...............__ ...„.. ___, 8 ET �� ,_ _.„ Ec.,, ..„.,,ii.,....„,„ ----„, .Tb^ K 8 n — - -- s a �et� E „, ja I X19 ��T ®Y 1 j ,,x- - .,k Es” , . NIL ., Legend EF t CSV 1.LGIM.hosp Mals l .`°'., t PavementConditionlndex2017 Future Priority Area s `��" area PCI_17 � - 0-30 IIq ..„. 0 ea —, R 51-60 Project 61 '° A 0 0.75 1.5 3 Miles .' Area - 201 9 81-100 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I CSV_OAS.LGIM.Streets 2019 2020 2021 2022 111 2023 2024 Project Description: Yearly pavement preservation projects citywide. Funding includes $2.2M from Fund 311 and $1.4M from the Street Wear Fee. The 2019 and future Street Wear Fee priority areas are identified above. Future Street Wear Fee projects will be selected based on pavement conditions for local access streets. Fund 311 projects for 2019 are identified in TIP projects 5 and 6. Fund 311 may also supplement other preservation projects listed in the TIP as needed. Phase: Preliminary Engineering and Construction Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering (PE): $175,000 yearly Right of Way (RW): Construction (CN): 3,425,000 yearly Total Cost 2019-24: $3,600,000 yearly 4 I City of Spokane Valley 2019-2024 Six-Year TIP 5. Sullivan / Wellesely Intersection Improvement Spokane valley Wellesley I gni ci �rr 0 25 50 100 Feet IIIII _ I 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Project Description: Improve intersection with traffic signal or roundabout, connect with extension of Bigelow Gulch Road. Phase: Preliminary Engineering, Right-of-Way, and Construction Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering (PE): $103,000 Right of Way (RW): 120,000 Construction (CN): 1,103,000 Total Cost 2019-24: $1,327,000 City of Spokane Valley 2019-2024 Six-Year TIP 15 6. Evergreen - Mission Connector to IndianaSpokane valley Indiana t, 1 n ,, Fl90FW Y E/90 Fl yam. Y IL 141MIa 4 7<<, a M'm Zu' ' . ss,on �'T'' r+r.t v, a ulg ter ConnecttO� „ 0 125 250 500 Feet Mtsston Salto Ave N* 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Project Description: Grind and inlay hot-mix asphalt to preserve pavement condition on Mission Connector and asphalt sections of Evergreen Road between Mission Connector and Indiana Avenue. Phase: Preliminary Engineering and Construction Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering (PE): $33,000 Right of Way (RW): Construction (CN): 591,000 Total Cost 2019-24: $624,000 6 I City of Spokane Valley 2019-2024 Six-Year TIP 7. Wilbur Road Sidewalk - Broadway to Boone Spokan�` valley Sharp oo a l m , t k Boone .,,,..;m:. , �y� 4 i Ii w og ( x 4 ;� UI foo i Cataldo ' .r a „ O , ,S-' df E',S: - _ te. + il t ,;il . N 1 4 , R '. k Broadway 0 100 200 i$ t yet I I , , , 1 N 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Project Description: Install sidewalk from Broadway Avenue to Boone Avenue to improve Safe Routes to School-designated route to nearby schools. Phase: Preliminary Engineering and Construction Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering (PE): $41,000 Right of Way (RW): Construction (CN): 297,000 Total Cost 2019-24: $338,000 City of Spokane Valley 2019-2024 Six-Year TIP 17 8. Mission Avenue Sidewalk - Union to Bowdish Spokane valley Nora c Augusta CD N Mission W a G: Maxwell 3 7 0 100 200 400 Feet Sinto N 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Project Description: Add sidewalk to the north side of Mission Avenue, from Bowdish Road to 150' east of Union, to complete a gap in the sidewalk network and improve connectivity to Valley Mission Park. Phase: Preliminary Engineering and Construction Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering (PE): $12,000 Right of Way (RW): Construction (CN): 426,000 Total Cost 2019-24: $438,000 8 I City of Spokane Valley 2019-2024 Six-Year TIP 9. Wellesley Sidewalk - McDonald to Evergreen Spokane valley Olympic v 0 � fD o. Broad m CD CD Wellesley m Heroy Heroy t cn Ct 0 250 500 1,000 Feet 1111111112019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Project Description: Add sidewalk to Wellesley from McDonald to Evergreen to improve Safe Routes to School-designated route. Phase: Preliminary Engineering and Construction Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering (PE): $7,000 Right of Way (RW): Construction (CN): 408,000 Total Cost 2019-24: $415,000 City of Spokane Valley 2019-2024 Six-Year TIP 19 10. Knox Road Sidewalk - Hutchinson to Sargent Spokane e valley Mansfield c o cn CI 7 � 2 - uuuuuuuuu Knox sxxxsxx N � d 0 io 7 p d d 01 CC� Shannon 0 100 200 400 Feet N 2017 11IIIII2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Project Description: Add sidewalk to Knox Road from Hutchinson Avenue to Sargent Avenue to extend existing sidewalk network and improve connectivity to the Argonne/Mullan Corridor. Phase: Preliminary Engineering and Construction Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering (PE): $16,000 Right of Way (RW): Construction (CN): 296,000 Total Cost 2019-24: $312,000 10 I City of Spokane Valley 2019-2024 Six-Year TIP 11 . Barker Road - Euclid to Garland ,, valley E Garland Ln W 0 coi. i 1 E Bridgeport Ave z m a z m �11 X s f .A, 0 250 500 1,000 Feet E'"'c\1d Euclid I I I I I I I I I N 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Project Description: Reconstruct Barker Road to 3-lane urban section with a shared-use pathway to accommodate current and planned development. Phase: Preliminary Engineering, Right-of-Way, and Construction Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering (PE): $147,000 Right of Way (RW): 140,000 Construction (CN): 2,294,000 Total Cost 2019-24: $2,581 ,000 City of Spokane Valley 2019-2024 Six-Year TIP 111 12. Appleway Trail - Evergreen to Sullivan Spokane valley p: E Valleyway Ave.. _ _ _ ,,1 r E Valleyway kve IFO M1` a t "a. -R• - EMain Ave, • ; E z •A ..s._'. li vII III Sprague N 1[ _E_2nd Aye __.-... - -- 7 1g �,,6 rit rr , 4 P E 3rd ; 4 ,, ,� `"d r P. a ' ° r, i°r.,a' '&«'n xr ° g r n 44' fl „ ,,,„?,.„,,,,,1y.,, r 3 a, q A' z 1.1 41 A� d�'P' N { � 'v ''--.4 A � ° 6�” ;,h .y}n 1)"q�,. � p' II '+7a r%am x '''� ..,-!4,..,7*--, mw r ,.� a mr' `"�kap . jE I �{ ^x"[`.,. ,rrnr�.,,„ Ml.:.e "� " b r te. 4thI1-1 d,a,.,_ .:.* 1� r ,. A 6 - e. <� zt; 1 —_. ,a,. E 6th Ave .,. -_ - .. _--. -_- E 7th Ave, _ 8th _ 0 0.125 - 0.26 0.5 Miles' r; . I I I I"; I . 1 1 I _ I ,� g ' N ;a 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Project Description: Construct Shared-Use-Pathway to complete the final stretch of trail establishing an uninterrupted path from University Road to Corbin Road. Phase: Preliminary Engineering and Construction Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering (PE): $87,000 Right of Way (RW): Construction (CN): 2,250,000 Total Cost 2019-24: $2,337,000 12 I City of Spokane Valley 2019-2024 Six-Year TIP 13. Wilbur Road Sidewalk - Boone to Mission Spokan�` valley , .,: Mission Y gy Maxwell aft o Sinto Sinto 47 Sinto S � e Sharp 0 125 250 500 Feet Boone vur N 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Project Description: Install sidewalk on Wilbur Road from Boone Avenue to Mission Avenue to complete sidewalk connection on Safe Routes to School-designated route, connecting with planned sidewalks on Mission Avenue to the north and a segment of Wilbur Road immediately to the south, described in projects 7 and 8. Phase: Preliminary Engineering, Right-of-Way, and Construction Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering (PE): $64,000 Right of Way (RW): 21,000 Construction (CN): 558,000 Total Cost 2019-24: $643,000 City of Spokane Valley 2019-2024 Six-Year TIP 113 14. MuIlan Road - Broadway to Mission Spokane valley gp FwY �� ,? 4.. sad i I u, i O O Mission , rw it 1 01 _NM g j ESin1�A '� - _ ,..�' _ 7. �V.e...- r -. pD 11 C t0 1 i R_ . fir E Boone Ave .,F --' 77. r 1 Iz i4 4 4k N z ss "'� a' s I 1 W 1T,_ N 1m r ECataldoAve ' ' ,b.-t_.--__ . ...'.-_ - - A 1 z N Si a 1= Broadway _ _, — _ --01' ` .375- 750 1,500 Feet . --\. i. iq i1 I I I I I I It I ¢a 1 E gpringfieldlin 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Project Description: Pavement preservation project, grind and inlay of hot-mix asphalt. Project will install conduit for future ITS infill and will also upgrade traffic signals at Mission Avenue. Phase: Preliminary Engineering, Right-of-Way, and Construction Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering (PE): $149,000 Right of Way (RW): 160,000 Construction (CN): 1,091,000 Total Cost 2019-24: $1,400,000 14 I City of Spokane Valley 2019-2024 Six-Year TIP 15. Sprague / Barker Intersection ImprovementSpokan ` valley 4 Pe . l. Sprague 7 °' o x N ,r i iicil 0 25 50 100 Feet k. 111111111 - a N 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Project Description: Improve intersection with traffic signal or roundabout as part of overall improvements to the Barker Corridor to address current and forecasted traffic impacts. Phase: Preliminary Engineering, Right-of-Way, and Construction Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering (PE): $157,000 Right of Way (RW): 212,000 Construction (CN): 1,149,000 Total Cost 2019-24: $1,517,000 City of Spokane Valley 2019-2024 Six-Year TIP 115 16. Park Road - Broadway to IndianaSpokane' valley ,evert. ,r'µ %' Indiana • .. ,.. _ r �� m- ' Nora - m _ Augusta __ Mission �, m V , , 1Slnto 77a a w ,.. , (.. ,, IW .« i m l 4 Boone 5 CD .�..' i 1 CP m - -7 Fi, Cataldo FF ��O w i a 1 tom p 4 g g 0 275 550 x;100 Feet a q d Broadway ....R..\1 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Project Description: Reconstruct Park Road between Broadway Avenue and Indiana Avenue to a 3-lane urban section with curb, sidewalks, bike lanes, and stormwater facilities. The PE phase was completed to 90% in 2009. Phase: Right of Way and Construction Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering (PE): Right of Way (RW): $310,000 Construction (CN): 4,190,000 Total Cost 2019-24: $4,500,000 16 I City of Spokane Valley 2019-2024 Six-Year TIP 17. Argonne Concrete - Indiana to Montgomery Spokane valley Montgomery ' , am- 1„ 11,fi i IT114,1i w a � 11 Il t i � � 'acs t � _ vr,2 �'+ s:. ✓ f�D ate+ px 9111111 Q 75 150 •uadiara_ 2019 2020 72021 2022 2023 2024 Project Description: Reconstruct Argonne Road in concrete from Indiana Avenue to Montgomery Avenue. Improve signal timing at Montgomery Avenue. Phase: Preliminary Engineering, Right-of-Way, and Construction Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering (PE): $691,000 Right of Way (RW): 40,000 Construction (CN): 5,069,000 Total Cost 2019-24: $5,800,000 City of Spokane Valley 2019-2024 Six-Year TIP 117 18. 8th Ave / Carnahan Intersection Improvement Spokane valley "„ x - x sou , ilif ,..,M+mom' ati 18th b. t , �fhti54 � � � zl ,UJ ;i 6 z_ k yak . *,44"1*.... >� �. ` i N d , . r ^k ; v 5d g"i ` .d.'J ly -' 'r� '' KJ 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Project Description: Improve intersection alignment. Right-of-way phase planned for 2018. Phase: Preliminary Engineering and Construction Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering (PE): $175,000 Right of Way (RW): Construction (CN): 1,075,000 Total Cost 2019-24: $1,250,000 18 I City of Spokane Valley 2019-2024 Six-Year TIP 19. Pines / Mission Intersection Improvement Spokane valley E190Fwy Via. 4 t oaP aw 101111 'Tvi,,',, k q ,I i 101., I1�1I1 1'1_1,"' du 1II 1 i , Fitd� , iih ��Iii 4 o I kn iSi�I I hi I`l I .. C Ifillli 11' y Ft�p Ii91 EI i;l a , $ �ll`gi6I ��(v, i I. py!1-9ir1LI1iLhI" ,, Ili.AlLi W I,,1 Mission G ,*o ag 0 125 250 500 Feet 1 �� IIIIIIIII 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Project Description: Improve the intersection of Pines Road and Mission Avenue to address intersection capacity. Improve signal timing and add turn lanes. Phase: Preliminary Engineering, Right-of-Way, and Construction Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering (PE): $204,000 Right of Way (RW): 32,000 Construction (CN): 1,164,000 Total Cost 2019-24: $1,400,000 City of Spokane Valley 2019-2024 Six-Year TIP 119 20. 8th Ave. / Barker Rd. Intersection Improvement Spokan�` valley • t. W 8th 0 50 100 200 Feet 0 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Project Description: Improve intersection traffic control to address current and forecasted traffic demand. Phase: Preliminary Engineering, Right-of-Way, and Construction Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering (PE): $72,000 Right of Way (RW): 80,000 Construction (CN): 480,000 Total Cost 2019-24: $632,000 20 I City of Spokane Valley 2019-2024 Six-Year TIP 21 . Barker Road - S. City Limits to ApplewaySpokan ` valley w G04.01ay Nixon. __._ ' � � pp r to.,,....,-- 2 7 i Sprague -. 1sta ,7�, r ' m 2nd .,r `" 6 -, .z r a t 6 , r � � 2 '.....:%.1„; 3rd - — C-.1 o 4th a i o 6th 7th — _ - -- — CD - cn W. 8th x .. 9th 10th fh 0 0'�'2�"`• . 0.25 ro.: °co vv 0.5 1Vliies N, 11th M1 N 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Project Description: Widen and improve Barker Road to a 3-lane urban section with a center-turn-lane, curb and gutter, and sidewalks to accommodate current and forecasted traffic demand. Phase: Preliminary Engineering, Right-of-Way, and Construction Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering (PE): $326,000 Right of Way (RW): 25,000 Construction (CN): 2,502,000 Total Cost 2019-24: $2,854,000 City of Spokane Valley 2019-2024 Six-Year TIP 121 22. Barker Road - Appleway to 1-90 Spokan ` valley t. oad'way'r' r •"'', I � l , i � � #s biCN40)i4',,' Y r 11.1.1' 'ay � & ,BPOadW � Ck�.TE y�*�p 1 N c�§ ,��I� -0,---,-..,--1!:=i1;,, f� �,,� l )°� . 0�hr';',- �3�{h1 �� `' � b -'4,.,041' � t{S M t ��'.r^�+� �� `�I ICY b 4F1 t It, !`tltal t't.'!,, -a. , a u ° ,,,10,4,k, � t r v � r p ' ..*'',,4„..,1 , „I. ,,„,,,,,in lori;,, ..'„' Pu'- yds. ",:�!�, f' a _. y `. F 0 • -- ECowley Ave +#, , ,�. • e 04.4 0 '' 0 187.5 375 750 Feet '` ' I I s' I I I I I I I N 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Project Description: Widen and improve Barker Road between Appleway Boulevard and the 1-90 interchange. Reconstruct as a 5-lane urban section. Phase: Preliminary Engineering, Right-of-Way, and Construction Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering $382,000 (PE): Right of Way (RW): 850,000 Construction (CN): 2,397,000 Total Cost 2019-24: $3,629,000 22 I City of Spokane Valley 2019-2024 Six-Year TIP 23. Barker Road - Spokane River to Euclid Spokan�` valley n i( m N eUcUd Euclid --� --- — .�a me' _-- z { :';;-''')ti S ,,„€tJ '' ,n x ''' ' 4, E GracePVe EBu.ck t _. ___ 2s1< i 14 i{ r ah �q Dat i p�; 07 m ° \ e' ,o't‘oe, vcs ,4,0 Z e 0 0.125 0.2 „Spokane River .i es I I I N 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Project Description: Reconstruct Barker Road to 3-lane urban section with a shared-use pathway to accommodate current and planned development. Phase: Preliminary Engineering, Right-of-Way, and Construction Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering (PE): $449,000 Right of Way (RW): 120,000 Construction (CN): 3,520,000 Total Cost 2019-24: $4,089,000 City of Spokane Valley 2019-2024 Six-Year TIP 123 24. Barker Road - Garland to Trent Spokan�` valley a � J 0 Garland 0 250 500 1,000 Feet 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023] 2024 Project Description: Widen and improve Barker Road from Garland Avenue to the Barker Grade Separation at the BNSF Railroad and Trent Avenue. Reconstruct Barker Road to 3-lane urban section with a shared-use pathway to accommodate current and planned development. Phase: Preliminary Engineering, Right-of-Way, and Construction Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering (PE): $224,000 Right of Way (RW): 140,000 Construction (CN): 1,819,000 Total Cost 2019-24: $2,183,000 24 I City of Spokane Valley 2019-2024 Six-Year TIP 25. Pines SR-27 / 16th Intersection Improvement Spokane a Valley 15th > - 1 1.111111111l' C-' 16th . 3 r. do - 17th t, "! 4f 0 125 250 500 Feet I I I I I I I I I . 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 ' 2024 Project Description: Improve five-leg intersection design and traffic control at Pines Road and 16th Avenue. Phase: Preliminary Engineering, Right-of-Way, and Construction Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering (PE): $390,000 Right of Way (RW): 100,000 Construction (CN): 2,900,000 Total Cost 2019-24: $3,390,000 City of Spokane Valley 2019-2024 Six-Year TIP 125 26. Mirabeau / Mansfield Intersection Improvement Spokan�` valley 0 aJ ca Mansfield ��ahS''ea q�e 0 37.5 75 150 Feet 111111111 N 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Project Description: Improve intersection traffic control as surrounding area continues to develop. Phase: Preliminary Engineering, Right-of-Way, and Construction Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering (PE): $120,000 Right of Way (RW): 100,000 Construction (CN): 685,000 Total Cost 2019-24: $905,000 26 I City of Spokane Valley 2019-2024 Six-Year TIP 27. Argonne & 1-90 Interchange Bridge WideningSpoi ' valley ■� s '1'44i' #t t Y p E`90 fwy ,. A E °pwy h C, 3 3 m ° ffr r ,t;,,,%, S{ O 5i 1 q J"' F t� Y 4j . .11251 , 'r, 500 Feet h,, { , m oir � �Pf �{gip. l" — a : !' �: , -..�, _ �� +'q `r',; . 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Project Description: Reconstruct and widen Argonne Road bridge over 1-90 to accommodate three southbound lanes and improved sidewalks. Phase: Preliminary Engineering, Right-of-Way, and Construction Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering (PE): $425,000 Right of Way (RW): Construction (CN): 3,600,000 Total Cost 2019-24: $4,025,000 City of Spokane Valley 2019-2024 Six-Year TIP 127 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: June 5, 2018 Department Director Approval: ❑ Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ® new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Proposed Resolution 18-003: Adoption of the 2019-2024 Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 35.77.010, Perpetual advanced six-year plans for coordinated transportation program expenditures. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Administrative Report on Draft 2019-2024 Six-Year TIP on May 15, 2018; public hearing June 5, 2018. BACKGROUND: The TIP is composed of transportation projects intended to be implemented in the next six years that address the transportation needs within the City of Spokane Valley. The City is required by RCW 35.77.010 to prepare and, after holding a public hearing, adopt a comprehensive transportation program for the ensuing six calendar years. This plan must be submitted to the Washington State Department of Transportation by June 30th of each year. The attached six-year TIP presents an integrated approach to project selection and phasing that have been aligned with recent master plans, upcoming redevelopment projects, economic development efforts, land use changes, and capital projects by partner agencies. Staff reviewed historical funding levels for federal, state and City funds to estimate projected funding levels available during the next six years. The six-year TIP is required to be financially constrained and reflect realistic expectations of annual funding levels. OPTIONS: Adopt the 2019-2024 Six-Year TIP as presented, or adopt the 2019-2024 Six-Year TIP with revisions. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to approve Resolution 18-003, adopting the 2019-2024 Six-Year TIP as presented. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: The City's match on federal and state funded projects is typically between 13.5% and 20%. Staff will coordinate with the Finance Department as projects identified in the TIP move forward and as grant opportunities become available to ensure local match requirements can be met. STAFF CONTACT: Colin Quinn-Hurst— Senior Transportation Planner Mike Basinger— Economic Development Manager ATTACHMENTS: 1) Resolution 18-003 2) 2019-2024 Six-Year TIP DRAFT CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY SPOKANE COUNTY,WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. 18-003 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING THE 2019-2024 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, AND OTHER MATTERS RELATING THERETO. WHEREAS,to provide for the proper and necessary development of the street system within the City of Spokane Valley, the City shall, as required by State law, develop and adopt annually a Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program (Six-Year TIP) with such program acting as a guide for the coordinated development of the City's transportation system; and WHEREAS,the Six-Year TIP of the City shall specifically set forth those projects and programs of both City and regional significance that benefit the transportation system and promote public safety and efficient vehicle movements; and WHEREAS,the Six-Year TIP shall be consistent with the City Comprehensive Plan and be adopted following one or more public hearings before the City Council; and WHEREAS, a draft copy of the Six-Year TIP was submitted to the Washington State Department of Commerce and has been reviewed and approved prior to the scheduled adoption of the TIP in accordance with RCW 36.70A.106; and WHEREAS, the City Council conducted a public hearing on June 5, 2018, for the purpose of inviting and receiving public comment on the proposed Six-Year TIP. NOW THEREFORE,be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley, Spokane County,Washington,as follows: Section 1. The City Council hereby adopts the attached Six-Year TIP for the City of Spokane Valley for the purpose of guiding the design, development and construction of local and regional transportation improvements for the years 2019 through 2024. The City Clerk is directed to file the 2019- 2024 Six-Year(TIP)with the Washington State Secretary of Transportation before June 30,2018.The Six- Year TIP shall be reviewed at least annually for the purpose of determining the work to be accomplished under the program and the City transportation requirements. Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, and are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions. Section 2. Effective Date. This Resolution shall be in full force and effect upon adoption. Adopted this 5th day of June,2018. ATTEST: City of Spokane Valley Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk L.R. Higgins,Mayor Approved as to Form: Office of the City Attorney Resolution 18-003,Adopting Six-Year TIP SpOkafle 2019 - 2024 Six Year .•,,,OValley Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) 4 .fir s , t _ �'= v „ Asir .. r-� `A `- :y .. •s(`- z --- - ;� ,' _ a -.� . __. .r f .- Ms .c'Y n.: yrs r • a c � �tr ��- -- ': f,..7.;. '- _ '+�.,:� rt l �.y' Y om,. .. '--- , vi; - � g 7_,..m....) 'Xi, ,N Pi ��'y e..�: - -yrs,.. _ -.i v f ri —R f '�. _ _'s---40-4-7,--,r-. - .- -s�°.' 4_ `- p �f r i2r r. "- `� -. r - -fir%sem ` r� ��•`�� , '' ' ' a _ '"' r _ sem' y_ r -� ""•, -=� � _ � �` ' r _ ee - --.r - '7- _yr• __ . -, t,- < .. �- _ :' 3. rt .0%%..,_-''J-...„,.., y . eg , *+ „�. •a r-- le.* . r - _ - - - - ii, �r a. g gyp ' • roft, - ,- _'-i -..[- T - Via. --- -. - ` — iii ._- - „.... „,-„, 4,e,,,, . , -„,I T. a d` tea. �'T City of Spokane Valley Community & Public Works Department 2019-2024 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Spokane Valley Glossary & Abbreviations Funding Sources: Project Phases: • City City Funds • PE Preliminary Engineering • CDBG Community Development Block Grant • RW Right-of-Way • CMAQ Congestion Management/Air Quality • CN Construction • COM Washington Department of Commerce • DEV Private Developer Funds • FHWA Federal Highway Administration • FMSIB Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board • FTA Federal Transit Authority • HSIP Highway Safety Improvement Program • NHFP National Highway Freight Program • Other Misc. Unidentified Funding Sources • RCO Washington State Recreation Conservation Office • REET Real Estate Excise Tax • RR Railroad • SRTS Safe Routes to School • SW City Stormwater Funds • STA Spokane Transit Authority • STBG Surface Transportation Block Grant • STBG-SA Surface Transportation Block Grant—Set Aside • TIB Transportation Improvement Board • TIGER Transportation Investment Generating Economic Recovery • WAL Washington Legislature • WSDOT Washington Department of Transportation ,,, 2019- 2024 skane Six-Year' Transportation Improvement Program / 1I1t.\ Dollars in Thousands Funding Project/Description I Current Status I Length Total Sources 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Total 1 Broadway @ Argonne/Mullan Concrete Intersections 12 City 12 12 (CN Only) Description: Reconstruct intersections in concrete pavement. Status: Funding Status: PE 0 Construction primarily in 2018,final paperwork in 2019. RW 0 Length (miles) Intersection Secured CN 12 12 Total 12 12 2 Barker Road/BNSF Grade Separation Project 24,110 City 98 30 1,589 1,555 237 3,509 NHFP 448 852 1,880 1,840 280 5,300 Description: TIGER 152 47 4,056 3,969 604 8,828 Construct Grade Separation at Barker/BNSF RR/Trent(SR290). FMSIB 2,350 2,300 350 5,000 WAL 538 268 806 Other 281 86 141 138 21 667 Status: Funding Status: Secured PE 1,116 343 1,459 Design ongoing. Secured RW 400 940 1,340 Length (miles) Intersection Secured CN 10,015 9,802 1,492 21,309 Total 1,517 1,283 10,016 9,802 1,492 24,110 3 Pines(SR27)/BNSF Grade Separation Project 28,400 City 949 1,186 304 101 889 2,667 6,096 STBG 2,846 949 3,795 Description: Other 4,627 13,882 18,509 Construct Grade Separation at Pines/BNSF RR/Trent(SR290). Status: Funding Status: Partial PE 949 1,186 2,135 Design ongoing. Planned RW 3,150 1,050 4,200 Length (miles) Intersection Planned CN 5,516 16,549 22,065 Total 949 1,186 3,150 1,050 5,516 16,549 28,400 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances,and are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions. 5/31/2018 Page 1 a 2019- 2024 Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program Nelle)- Dollars in Thousands ✓ Funding Project/Description I Current Status I Length Total Sources 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Total 4 Street Preservation Projects-Annual 21,595 City 3,600 3,600 3,600 3,600 3,600 3,595 21,595 Description: Pavement preservation projects citywide. Ongoing,yearly amounts subject to change. Status: Funding Status: Planned pE 175 175 175 175 175 175 1,050 2019 projects to focus on neighborhood street preservation. RW 0 Length (miles) Varies Planned CN 3,425 3,425 3,425 3,425 3,425 3,421 20,544 Total 3,600 3,600 3,600 3,600 3,600 3,595 21,595 5 Sullivan/Wellesley Intersection Improvement 1,327 City 22 257 279 CMAQ 141 907 1,048 Description: Traffic signal or roundabout. Status: Funding Status: Secured pE 103 103 Design underway. Secured RW 60 60 120 Length (miles) Intersection Secured CN 1,103 1,103 Total 163 1,164 1,327 6 Evergreen Resurfacing-Mission Connector to Indiana 624 City 84 84 STBG 540 540 Description: Grind and inlay hot-mix asphalt. Status: Funding Status: Secured PE 33 33 Design underway. Secured RW 0 Length (miles) 0.7 Secured CN 591 591 Total 624 624 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances,and are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions. 5/31/2018 Page 2 y 2019- 2024 Spokane Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program '/a11C Dollars in Thousands Funding Project/Description I Current Status I Length Total Sources 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Total 7 Wilbur Road Sidewalk- Broadway to Boone 338 City 51 51 CDBG 287 287 Description: Install sidewalk from Broadway to Boone. Status: Funding Status: Secured PE 41 41 Pending Fall 2018 CDBG contract agreement. Secured RW 0 Length (miles) 0.3 Secured CN 297 297 Total 338 338 8 Mission Ave. Sidewalk-Union to Bowdish 438 City 87 87 TIB 351 351 Description: Add sidewalk to Mission Avenue,install ramps and curb. Status: Funding Status: Secured PE 12 12 Grant funds secured for design and construction. RW 0 Length (miles) 0.3 Secured CN 426 426 Total 438 438 9 Wellesley Sidewalk-McDonald to Evergreen 415 City 42 42 SRTS 373 373 Description: Install sidewalk,curb and gutter and ramps. Status: Funding Status: Secured PE 7 7 Planned construction in 2019. RW 0 Length (miles) 0.5 Secured CN 408 408 Total 415 415 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances,and are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions. 5/31/2018 Page 3 y 2019- 2024 Spokane Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program MilkyDollars in Thousands Funding Project/Description I Current Status I Length Total Sources 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Total 10 Knox Sidewalk-Hutchinson to Sargent 312 City 38 38 CDBG 274 274 Description: Install curb,gutter,and sidewalk. Status: Funding Status: PE 16 16 Applied for CDBG grant funding. RW 0 Length (miles) 0.2 CN 296 296 Total 312 312 11 Barker Rd-Euclid Ave.to Garland Ave. 2,581 City 135 135 STBG 1,919 1,919 Description: FMSIB 509 509 Reconstruct Barker to 3-lane urban section with shared-use path in DEV 12 6 18 partnership with County Sewer Extension. Status: Funding Status: Partial pE 147 147 Design 2018,prepare for construction by 2020. Partial RW 140 140 Length (miles) 0.8 Partial CN 2,294 2,294 Total 147 2,434 2,581 12 Appleway Trail-Evergreen to Sullivan 2,337 City 12 304 316 CMAQ 75 1,747 1,822 Description: STBG-SA 199 199 Construct shared-use pathway along public utility corridor. Status: Funding Status: Secured PE 87 87 Under design currently for 2020 construction. RW 0 Length (miles) 1 Secured CN 2,250 2,250 Total 87 2,250 2,337 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances,and are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions. 5/31/2018 Page 4 y 2019- 2024 Spokane Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program ' iIllcy Dollars in Thousands Funding Project/Description I Current Status I Length Total Sources 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Total 13 Wilbur Road Sidewalk- Boone to Mission 643 City 45 42 87 STBG-SA 556 556 Description: Install sidewalk from Boone to Mission. Status: Funding Status: Planned PE 45 19 64 Seeking grant funding through SRTS and STBG Set-Aside. Planned RW 21 21 Length (miles) 0.3 Planned CN 558 558 Total 45 598 643 14 Mullan Road Preservation-Broadway to Mission 1,400 City 42 147 189 STBG 267 944 1,211 Description: Grind and inlay hot-mix asphalt, provide conduit for future ITS infill, upgrade traffic signals at Mission. Status: Funding Status: Planned PE 149 149 Applying for STBG Preservation funds. Planned RW 160 160 Length (miles) 0.3 Planned CN 1,091 1,091 Total 309 1,091 1,400 15 Sprague/Barker Intersection Improvement 1,517 City 16 16 183 215 STBG 104 104 966 1,174 Description: DEV 64 64 128 Intersection improvement. Status: Funding Status: Partial PE 79 79 157 Applied for 2020-2023 STBG funds to supplement developer and City Planned RW 106 106 212 funds. Length (miles) Intersection Secured CN 1,149 1,149 Total 184 184 1,149 1,517 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances,and are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions. 5/31/2018 Page 5 2019- 2024 Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program \4llt Dollars in Thousands Funding Project/Description I Current Status I Length Total Sources 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Total 16 Park Road-Broadway to Indiana 4,500 City 42 800 842 STBG 268 3,390 3,658 Description: Reconstruct to a 3-lane section with curb,sidewalks,bike lanes and stormwater facilities. PE phase completed to 90%in 2009 with STP, now STBG,funds. Status: Funding Status: PE 0 RW planned in 2020. Planned RW 310 310 Length (miles) 0.8 Partial CN 4,190 4,190 Total 310 4,190 4,500 17 Argonne Road Concrete Pavement- Indiana to 5,800 City 98 292 390 Montgomery STBG 633 1,877 2,510 Description: FMSIB 1,160 1,160 Reconstruct pavement in concrete and improve signal timing at Other 1,740 1,740 Montgomery. Status: Funding Status: Planned PE 691 691 Applied for grant funding for 2021-22 FMSIB and STBG funds. Planned RW 40 40 Length (miles) 0.3 Planned CN 5,069 5,069 Total 731 5,069 5,800 18 8th Ave/Carnahan Intersection Improvement 1,250 City 175 775 950 TIB 300 300 Description: Intersection improvement. Status: Funding Status: Planned PE 175 175 Realign intersection. RW 0 Length (miles) Intersection Planned CN 1,075 1,075 Total 175 1,075 1,250 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances,and are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions. 5/31/2018 Page 6 y 2019- 2024 Spokane Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program Milk' Dollars in Thousands Funding Project/Description I Current Status I Length Total Sources 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Total 19 Pines/Mission Intersection Improvement 1,400 City 30 157 187 CMAQ 190 1,023 1,213 Description: Intersection improvements for signalization and turning movements. Status: Funding Status: Planned PE 204 204 Applied for 2021-23 CMAQ program. Planned RW 16 16 32 Length (miles) Intersection Planned CN 1,164 1,164 Total 220 1,180 1,400 20 8th Ave./Barker Rd. Intersection Improvement 632 City 72 80 480 632 Description: Intersection improvement. Status: Funding Status: Planned PE 72 72 Conceptual phase,traffic study underway. Planned RW 80 80 Length (miles) Intersection Planned CN 480 480 Total 72 80 480 632 21 Barker Rd Improvements-South City Limits to 2,854 City 46 340 386 Appleway TIB 293 2,175 2,468 Description: Widen and improve roadway to 3-lane urban section in partnership with County Sewer Extension. Status: Funding Status: Planned PE 326 326 Design and construction anticipated to follow interim 1-90 interchange Planned RW 13 13 25 improvements. Length (miles) 0.8 Planned CN 2,502 2,502 Total 339 2,515 2,854 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances,and are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions. 5/31/2018 Page 7 2019- 2024 Sy ne Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program 4000,00 Valley Dollars in Thousands Funding Project/Description I Current Status I Length Total Sources 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Total 22 Barker Rd Improvement Project-Appleway to 1-90 3,629 City 52 115 324 491 Other 330 735 2,073 3,138 Description: Widen and improve to 5-lane urban section. Realign east leg of Broadway. Status: Funding Status: Planned PE 382 382 Design and construction anticipated to follow 1-90 interchange Planned RW 850 850 improvements. Length (miles) 0.3 Planned CN 2,397 2,397 Total 382 850 2,397 3,629 23 Barker Rd Improvement Project-Spokane River to 4,089 City 77 372 449 Euclid STBG 492 2,385 2,877 Description: FMSIB 763 763 Reconstruct and widen to 3-lane urban section with shared-use path. Status: Funding Status: Planned PE 449 449 Seeking grant funding for design and construction. Planned RW 120 120 Length (miles) 0.5 Planned CN 3,520 3,520 Total 569 3,520 4,089 24 Barker Rd Improvement Project-Garland to Trent 2,183 City 49 191 240 STBG 315 1,221 1,536 Description: FMSIB 407 407 Reconstruct Barker to 3-Lane urban section with shared-use path from Garland to south limits of Grade Separation Project at Trent. Status: Funding Status: Planned PE 224 224 Seeking grant funding for design and construction. Planned RW 140 140 Length (miles) 0.1 Planned CN 1,819 1,819 Total 364 1,819 2,183 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances,and are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions. 5/31/2018 Page 8 y 2019- 2024 Sane Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program MilkyDollars in Thousands Funding Project/Description I Current Status I Length Total Sources 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Total 25 Pines SR-27/16th Ave. Intersection Improvement 3,390 City 195 295 2,900 3,390 Description: Add intersection traffic control. Status: Funding Status: Secured PE 195 195 390 Applying for funding to improve five-leg intersection. Planned RW 100 100 Length (miles) Intersection Planned CN 2,900 2,900 Total 195 295 2,900 3,390 26 Mirabeau/Mansfield Intersection Improvement 905 City 120 110 230 CMAQ 25 650 675 Description: Intersection capacity improvements. Status: Funding Status: Partial PE 120 120 Initial planning in Mirabeau Subarea Traffic Study. Planned RW 25 75 100 Length (miles) Intersection Planned CN 685 685 Total 145 760 905 27 Argonne Rd & I-90 IC Bridge Widening 4,025 City 57 90 147 FMSIB 396 396 Description: STBG 368 3,114 3,482 Widen Argonne Rd Bridge to 3 Lanes southbound. Improve sidewalks. Status: Funding Status: Planned PE 425 425 Project anticipates need for bridge reconstruction over 1-90. RW 0 Length (miles) 0.1 Planned CN 3,600 3,600 Total 425 3,600 4,025 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances,and are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions. 5/31/2018 Page 9 ykane 2019- 2024 Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program ' �11C Dollars in Thousands Funding Project/Description I Current Status I Length Total Sources 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Total Totals: 8,917 7,990 103,794 120,701 8,602 12,765 19,837 24,854 20,657 33,991 120,706 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances,and are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions. 5/31/2018 Page 10 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: June 5, 2018 Department Director Approval: El Check all that apply: ® consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Approval of the Following Vouchers: VOUCHER LIST VOUCHER NUMBERS TOTAL AMOUNT 05/17/2018 6283 6294-6295; 6297; 6299 $73,076.22 05/23/2018 44679-44708 (-voided 44701) $43,431.63 05/24/2018 7599-7609 $1,166.00 05/30/2018 44709-44753 $182;854.86 05/31/2018 7610-7635 $5,154.00 GRAND TOTAL: $305,682.71 Explanation of Fund Numbers found on Voucher Lists #001 - General Fund Other Funds 001.011.000.511. City Council 101 Street Fund 001.013.000.513. City Manager 103 —Paths&Trails 001.013.015.515. Legal 105—Hotel/Motel Tax 001.016.000. Public Safety 106—Solid Waste 001.018.013.513. Deputy City Manager 120-CenterPlace Operating Reserve 001.018.014.514. Finance 121—Service Level Stabilization Reserve 001.018.016.518. Human Resources 122—Winter Weather Reserve 001.032.000. Public Works 204—Debt Service 001.058.050.558. CED -Administration 301 —REET 1 Capital Projects 001.058.051.558. CED Economic Development 302—REET 2 Capital Projects 001.058.055.558. CED—Development Services-Engineering 303 --Street Capital Projects 001.058.056.558. CED—DeveIopment Services-Planning 309—Parks Capital Grants 001.058.057.558 CED—Building 310--Civic Bldg Capital Projects 001.076.000.576. Parks &Rec—Administration 311 —Pavement Preservation 001.076.300.576. Parks&Rec-Maintenance 312—Capital Reserve 001.076.301.571. Parks&Rec-Recreation 314—Railroad Grade Separation Projects 001.076.302.576. Parks &Rec-Aquatics 402—Stormwater Management 001,076.304.575. Parks &Rec- Senior Center 403 --Aquifer Protection Area 001.076.305.571. Parks &Rec-CenterPlace 501 —Equipment Rental&Replacement 001.090.000.511. General Gov't-Council related 502—Risk Management 001.090.000.514. General Gov't-Finance related 001.090.000.517. General Gov't-Employee supply 001.090.000.518. General Gov't-Centralized Services 001.090.000.519. General Gov't-Other Services 001.090.000.540. General Gov't-Transportation 001.090.000.550. General Gov't-Natural &Economic 001.090.000.560. General Gov't-Social Services 001.090.000.594. General Gov't-Capital Outlay 001.090.000.595. General Gov't-Pavement Preservation RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to approve attached list of claim vouchers. [Approved as part of the Consent Agenda, or may be removed and discussed separately.] STAFF CONTACT: Chelsie Taylor, Finance Director ATTACHMENTS: Voucher Lists vchlist Voucher List Page: 1 05117/2018 7:44:49AM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 6283 5/18/2018 002227 IDAHO TAX COMMISSION Ben80069 001.231.50.03 IDAHO STATE TAX BASE: PAYMENT 2,083.04 Total: 2,083.04 6294 5/18/2018 000048 VANTAGE TRANSFER AGENTS,401A PLAN Ben80071 001.231.14.00 401A: PAYMENT 32,490.28 Total: 32,490.28 6295 5/18/2018 000682 EFTPS Ben80073 001.231.11.00 FEDERAL TAXES:PAYMENT 29,138.00 Total: 29,138.00 6297 5/18/2018 000145 VANTAGEPOINT TRANSFER AGENTS,457 PLf Ben80075 001.231.18.00 457 DEFERRED COMPENSATION:PAYI 8,727.40 Total: 8,727.40 6299 5/18/2018 000162 VANTAGE TRANSFER AGENTS,401A EXEC PL Ben80077 001.231.14.00 401 EXEC PLAN:PAYMENT 637.50 Total: 637.50 5 Vouchers for bank code: apbank Bank total: 73,076.22 5 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers: 73,076.22 Page: 1 .chllst Voucher List Page: -.-* 05/2312018 1:09:05PM Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 44679 5/23/2018 001081 ALSCO LSP02036326 001.016.016.521 PRECINCT FLOOR MAT SERVICE 24.12 LSPO2041665 001.016.016.521 PRECINCT FLOOR MAT SERVICE 24.48 Total : 48.60 44680 5/23/2018 004278 ARCHITECTS WEST INC 9656 001.090.000.513 PROFESSIONAL SVCS-CITY HALL 295.00 Total : 295.00----- 44681 5/23/2018 000334 ARGUS JANITORIAL LLC INV02929 001.033.000.518 JANITORIAL SVCS: CITY HALL, PRE 9,115.45 Total : 9,115.45 44682 5/23/2018 000030 AVISTA ESA#21242 309.000.270.594 ELECTRIC SERVICE AGREEMENT: 3,572.20 Total : 3,572.20--- 44683 5/23/2018 000148 BLUMENTHAL UNIFORMS& EQUIP 009740299 001.016.000.521 UNIFORM SERVICES FOR POLICE 21.76 009748665 001.016.000.521 UNIFORM SERVICES FOR POLICE 21.76 Total : 43.52 lei 44684 5/23/2018 004437 COMMUNITY ATTRIBUTES INC 2270 001.040.042.558 BROWNS PARK ECONOMIC IMPAC 7,880.63 Total : 7,880.63., 44685 5/23/2018 003274 EXCHANGE PUBLISHING LLC 489435 001.040.042.558 LEGAL PUBLICATION 31.60 490211 001.013.000.513 LEGAL PUBLICATION 19.50 490212 001.040.042.558 LEGAL PUBLICATION 30.00 490213 001.040.043.558 LEGAL PUBLICATION 75.00 490215 001.040.043.558 LEGAL PUBLICATION 51.75 490216 001.040.043.558 LEGAL PUBLICATION 77.42 490217 001.018.013.513 LEGAL PUBLICATION 170.00 490218 001.040.043.558 LEGAL PUBLICATION 77.42 490219 001.040.043.558 LEGAL PUBLICATION 81.37 ` Total : 614.06-"- 44686 14.06!44686 5/23/2018 001447 FREE PRESS PUBLISHING INC 48594 001.040.042.558 ADVERTISING 65.60 48595 001.040.043.558 ADVERTISING 163.20 48596 001.040.043.558 ADVERTISING 120.00 48599 001.040.043.558 ADVERTISING 92.65 48601 001.040.043.558 ADVERTISING 90.10 Page: .-31----- vchlist Voucher List Page: _3 -2-- 35/23/2018 1:09:05PM Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 44686 5/23/2018 001447 FREE PRESS PUBLISHING INC (Continued) 48602 001.040.043.558 ADVERTISING 94.35 ,- Total : 625.90 44687 5/23/2018 003186 GENERAL FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM 62091 001.016.016.521 ANNUAL FIRE ALARM INSPECTION 254.59 Total : 254.59.7 44688 5/23/2018 000007 GRAINGER 9775944045 001.033.000.518 SUPPLIES FOR CITY HALL 69.13 9775944052 001.033.000.518 SUPPLIES FOR CITY HALL 3.17 Total : 72.30 44689 5/23/2018 000002 H & H BUSINESS SYSTEMS INC. AR72337 001.040.043.558 COPIER COST 97.60 AR73332 001.011.000.511 COPIER COST 102.01 AR73333 001.018.014.514 COPIER COST 15.21 AR73334 001.018.016.518 COPIER COST 32.39 AR73335 001.013.015.515 COPIER COST 109.81 AR73336 001.013.000.513 COPIER COST 105.45 Total : 462.47 1--- 44690 44690 5/23/2018 006579 JACKSON,ADAM 1st Picture 001.018.016.518 "PICTURE IT" WELLNESS CAMPAIC 10.00 Total : 10.00 44691 5/23/2018. 000472 LAWTON PRINTING 42229 001.040.042.558 RETRACTABLE BANNER AND STAN 368.83 42230 001.040.042.558 TABLE THROW AND RUNNER 460.22 Total : 829.05 'y 44692 5/23/2018 000252 LOWE'S BUSINESS ACCOUNT May 2018 001.076.305.575 OPERATING SUPPLIES: CITY HALL 314.84 Total : 314.84 44693 5/23/2018 001002 M & L SUPPLY CO INC S100343673.001 001.033.000.518 SUPPLIES FOR CITY HALL 136.81 Total : 136.81 7 44694 5/23/2018 005457 MADDEN MEDIA 201708911 001.040.042.558 SPOKANE OFFICIAL VISITORS GUI 2,248.00 Total : 2,248.00..'- 44895 5/23/2018 006554 NAOMI May 2018 001.090.000.560 2018 SOC SER GRANT REIMBURSI 7,351.36 Total : 7,351.36 — Page: ..--2--- vchlist Voucher List Page: /f --3---- 05/23/2018 1:09:05PM Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 44696 5/23/2018 004829 OSI HARDWARE INV-US15279 001.090.000.518 MEDIA CONVERTER 649.51 Total : 649.51 44697 5/23/2018 001133 PATRIOT FIRE PROTECTION INC. 2316126-1 001.016.016.521 5 YEAR INSPECTION OF WET FIRE 488.93 Total : 488.934-"- 44698 5/23/2018 001860 PLATT ELECTRIC SUPPLY R037902 001.016.016.521 SUPPLIES FOR PRECINCT 81.19 R291406 001.016.016.521 SUPPLIES FOR PRECINCT 188.01 Total : 269.20! 44699 5/23/2018 006348 POWERS-HENDERSON, CANDICE 1st Picture 001.018.016.518 "PICTURE IT`WELLNESS CAMPAIC 10.00 Total : 10.00 44700 5/23/2018 000709 SENSKE LAWN &TREE CARE INC. 8362756 001.016.016.521 MONTHLY SVCS AT PRECINCT 809.43 Total : 809.43' -447-04 5/23/234-$-GQ0S68-SP-G �' ^^ SEIPI RIF}RR-COURT 3560727-0 0©1-013.01-5 1-5— FILING FEE - -- 24-0:00 [ 4 -3550493 004-7013701-5754-5 FILING FEE - 240700 it frig4t 4013550..-3+4 061.-01'3{15:5'€5 FILING-FE f 240,00- -3550:317 001:613015565 FILIN TFEE 240.00 -3550330 001313.015:515 FILING-FEE- 240.00. 3550.7364 001-:01-3:015:515---Fl-LING-FEE--- 24430-- 3550:386 001701-37015:51-5—HUNG FEC 240.00- Total : 1,C60.U0f 44702 5/23/2018 000001 SPOKANE CO TREASURER 110100203 001.040.042.558 PSA VIDEO SHARE/CONSTRUCTIC 130.00 Total : 130.00 l 44703 5/23/2018 001083 STANDARD PLBG HEATING CONTROLS 57003 001.016.016.521 APRIL2018 MONTHLY MAINT PREC 642.90 Total : 642.90 .� 44704 5/23/2018 001969 SUNSHINE DISPOSAL 1290505 101.042.000.542 TRANSFER STATION: CPW APRIL 2 1,068.34 Total : 1,068.34 44705 5/23/2018 006422 SUPPLYWORKS 434443594 001.016.016.521 SUPPLIES:JANITORIAL: PRECINC- 488.62 / Total : 488.62,-"-- 44706 44706 5/23/2018 001217 THOMAS DEAN & HOSKINS INC. 12596 309.000.270.594 SURVEY FOR WEST LAWN PROJE 1,600.00 ✓ Page: -3 vch list Voucher L stt Page: ,--4"--- 05/23/2018 1:09:05PM Spokane Vaoiey Sank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 44706 5/23/2018 001217 001217 THOMAS DEAN & HOSKINS INC. (Continued) Total : 1,600.00 44707 5/23/2018 006474 TYPECRAFT INC 79142 001.040.042.558 BUSINESS MAILER 84.86 Total : 84.86 44708 5/23/2018 000038 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF SPOKANE 0067486-1518-1 402.402.000.531 WASTE MGMT:VACTORING WAST 3,315.06 Total : 3,315.06'6".- 30 30 Vouchers for bank code: apbank !Bank total:- - --45;111.83 30 Vouchers in this report Totai-vovk.he�s . 4s-,11-1-76-3— F__,,( 5-42,1iii 4,,,,,. ,z, „.... , (4,(-,_ciA, 1,the undersigned,do certify under penalty of perjury, that the materials have been furnished,the services rendered,or the labor performed as described herein and that the claim is just,due and an unpaid obligation against the City of Spokane Valley, and that I am authorized to authenticate and certify said claim. 0(/,4 (7-1—, -(1-"--1 Finance Directo Date Cou Al me-7b= `-viewedr , IIIIIIW ,iorr- S- 4 .c, ,,o, aMayor f Da±_i__ tt1/4-kfZit-- Council Member Date Page: vchlist Voucher List Page: -1--- 05/24/2018 8:23:37AM Spokane Valley Bank code : pk-ref Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 7599 5/24/2018 006580 BEUQUE, JENNIFER PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 SUMMER DAY CAMP REFUND 107.00 Total : 107.00 7600 5/24/2018 006581 COMUNIDAD CRISTINA DE SPOKANE PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND-GREENACREE 75.00 Total : 75.00 7601 5/24/2018 006582 COUCH, CLAYTON PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND-MIRABEAU ME 75.00 Total : 75.00 7602 5/24/2018 006568 ESTES,AMANDA PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND- DISCOVERY P 75.00 Total : 75.00 7603 5/24/2018 006569 HAEGELE, CAROL PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 RESERVATION REFUND: MIRABEA 384.00 Total : 384.00 7604 5/2412018 004349 HAMMER, BECKY PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND- MIRABEAU ME 75.00 Total : 75.00 7605 5/24/2018 006584 KUNTZ, KAREN PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: MIRABEAU ME, 75.00 Total : 75.00 7606 5/24/2018 006570 MARCHAND, LISA PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DAMAGE DEPOSIT REFUND: BRO' 75.00 Total : 75.00 7607 5/24/2018 006583 MARTINEZ, ASHLEE PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND-MIRABEAU ME 75.00 Total : 75.00 7608 5124/2018 006571 SQUEZELLO, EMILY PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DAMAGE DEPOSIT REFUND: DISCI 75.00 Total : 75.00 7609 5/24/2018 006572 TABU, RICHARD PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DAMAGE DEPOSIT REFUND:TERF 75.00 Total : 75.00 11 Vouchers for bank code : pk-ref Bank total : 1,166.00 11 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers : 1,166.00 Page: -ii" vchlist Voucher List Page: . 05130/2018 1:03:09PM Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 44709 5/30/2018 001107 ADVANCEDTRAFFIC PRODUCTS 0000020949 301303.123.595 0123-SIGNAL EQUIPMENT 2,650.51 Total : 2,650.51 44710 5/30/2018 006402 ARAMARK UNIFORM&CAREER 1990690654 001.076.305.575 SUPPLIES FOR CENTERPLACE 540.95 1990711342 001.076.305.575 SUPPLIES FOR CENTERPLACE 601.88 Total : 1,142.83 44711 5/30/2018 000030 AVISTA April 2018 001.076.300.576 UTILITIES: PARKS MASTER AVISTA 8,713.64 April2018 101.042.000.542 UTILITIES: CPW MASTER AVISTA 26,482.59 Total : 35,196.23 44712 5/30/2018 004231 BELSBY ENGINEERING 18158 001.040.041.558 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 962.50 Total : 962.50 44713 5/30/2018 001816 BENTHIN &ASSOCIATES 2834 303.303.123.595 0123-CONSTRUCTION STAKING 2,565.00 Total : 2,565.00 44714 5/30/2018 003122 CALHOUN, MARK Expenses 001.013.000.513 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 118.28 Total : 118.28 44715 5/30/2018 000572 CARTER, CAROL Expenses 001.076.305.575 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 95.70 Total : 95.70 44716 5/30/2018 001888 COMCAST May 18-Jun 17 2018 001.090.000.518 INTERNET CITY HALL 106.17 Total : 106.17 44717 5/30/2018 002604 DELL FINANCIAL SERVICES LLC 79498743 001.090.000.548 COMPUTER LEASE: 001-8922117-0 1,050.24 Total : 1,050.24 44718 5/30/2018 006586 DILLARD,TAYLOR 1st Picture 001.018.016.518 "PICTURE IT"WELLNESS CAMPAIC 10.00 Total : 10.00 44719 5/30/2018 003697 ELECTRIC LIGHTWAVE LLC 15317533 001,090.000.518 INTERNET SERVICE 228.51 Total : 228.51 44720 5/30/2018 003682 EPIC LAND SOLUTIONS [NC 0318-0702 303.000.247.595 0247-15-073 I ACQUISITION REMEC 6,362.70 0418-0702 303.000.247.595 0247-15-073 [ACQUISITION REMEC 1,492.90 Page: — vchlist Voucher List Pager 05/30/2018 1:03:09PM Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice FundlDept Description/Account Amount 44720 5/30/2018 003682 003682 EPIC LAND SOLUTIONS [NC (Continued) Total : 7,855.60 44721 5/30/2018 000917 GRAYBAR 9304087837 001.090.000.518 SMALL TOOLS/MINOR EQUIP: IT 157.65 Total : 157.65 44722 5/30/2018 006002 GREGERSON, TINA Expenses 001.076.301.571 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 46.33 Total : 46.33 44723 5/30/2018 006577 INDEED INC 14357242 001.018.016.518 APRIL 2018 ADVERTISING FOR SU 208.00 Total : 208.00 44724 5/30/2018 003718 INLAND PUBLICATIONS INC 60342 001.076.301.571 ADVERTISING FOR PARKS AND RE 400.00 Total : 400.00 44725 5/30/2018 001635 ISS FACILITY EVENT SERVICES 1284735 001.076.305.575 EVENT SVCS AT CENTERPLACE 63.21 1284736 001.076.305.575 EVENT SVCS AT CENTERPLACE 42.14 1285789 001.076.305.575 EVENT SVCS AT CENTERPLACE 31.61 1285790 001.076.305.575 EVENT SVCS AT CENTERPLACE 21.07 1285791 001.076.305.575 EVENT SVCS AT CENTERPLACE 31.61 1286221 001.076.305.575 EVENT SVCS AT CENTERPLACE 52.68 1286222 001.076.305.575 EVENT SVCS AT CENTERPLACE 36.87 1287098 001.076.305.575 EVENT SVCS AT CENTERPLACE 63.21 1287100 001.076.305.575 EVENT SVCS AT CENTERPLACE 63.21 1287101 001.076.305.575 EVENT SVCS AT CENTERPLACE 52.68 Total : 458.29 44726 5/30/2018 006579 JACKSON,ADAM Expenses 001.040.042.558 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 147.35 Total : 147.35 44727 5/30/2018 001944 LANCER LTD 0469511 001.013.015.515 BUSINESS CARDS 38.09 0469512 001.040.043.558 BUSINESS CARDS 56.04 Total : 94.13 44728 5/30/2018 000132 MODERN ELECTRIC WATER CO 19492821 309.000.227.595 UTILITIES:APPLEWAY TRAIL 36.98 19492822 309.000.227.595 UTILITIES:APPLEWAY TRAIL 47.66 Total : 84.64 44729 5/30/2018 000636 MOORE IACOFANO GOLTSMAN, INC. 0053373 309.000.227.595 APPLEWAY TRAIL- PINES TO EVEI 88.20 Page: vchlist Voucher List Page: ------ 05/30/2018 1:03:09PM Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 44729 5/30/2018 000636 000636 MOORE IACOFANO GOLTSMAN, INC (Continued) Total : 88.20 44730 5/30/2018 000240 NAT'L LEAGUE OF CITIES 139163 001.011.000.511 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL 2018 000: 6,697.00 Total : 6,697.00 44731 5/30/2018 004850 NAVIA BENEFIT SOLUTIONS, HRA PLAN 10137362 001.018.016.518 FLEX SPENDING ADMINISTRATION 376.00 Total : 376.00 44732 5/30/2018 000652 OFFICE DEPOT INC. 134779289001 001.076.000.576 OFFICE SUPPLIES: PARKS/CENTEI 95.61 Total : 95.61 44733 5/30/2018 001860 PLATT ELECTRIC SUPPLY R313813 001.076.305.575 SUPPLIES FOR CENTERPLACE 26.73 R326905 001.076.305.575 SUPPLIES FOR CENTERPLACE 145.35 R326920 001.076.305.575 SUPPLIES FOR CENTERPLACE 85.68 Total : 257.76 44734 5/30/2018 000658 SPOKANE CO SUPERIOR COURT 3550.270 001.013.015.515 FILING FEE 240.00 Total : 240.00 44735 5/30/2018 000658 SPOKANE CO SUPERIOR COURT 3550.293 001.013.015.515 FILING FEE 240.00 Total : 240.00 44736 5/30/2018 000658 SPOKANE CO SUPERIOR COURT 3550.314 001.013.015.515 FILING FEE 240.00 Total : 240.00 44737 5/30/2018 000658 SPOKANE CO SUPERIOR COURT 3550.317 001.,013.015.515 FILING FEE 240.00 Total : 240.00 44738 5/30/2018 000658 SPOKANE CO SUPERIOR COURT 3550.330 001.013.015.515 FILING FEE 240.00 Total : 240.00 44739 5/30/2018 000658 SPOKANE CO SUPERIOR COURT 3550.364 001.013.015.515 FILING FEE 240.00 Total : 240.00 44740 5/30/2018 000658 SPOKANE CO SUPERIOR COURT 3550.386 001.013.015.515 FILING FEE 240.00 Total : 240.00 44741 5/30/2018 000001 SPOKANE CO TREASURER 11006328 303.000.251.595 CIP 0251: INSPECTION/TESTING FI 111.48 Page: —3--- vchlist Voucher List Page: ,i --4' 05/30/2018 1:03:09PM Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 44741 5/30/2018 000001 000001 SPOKANE CO TREASURER (Continued) Total : 111.48 44742 5/30/2018 000324 SPOKANE CO WATER DIST#3 May 2018 402.402.000.531 WATER CHARGES FOR MAY 2018 571.93 Total : 571.93 44743 5/30/2018 000404 SPOKANE VALLEY HERITAGE MUSEUM May 2018 105.000.000.557 2018 LODGING TAX GRANT REIMB 1,051.00 May 2018 105.000.000.557 2018 LODGING TAX GRANT REIMB 1,930.00 Total : 2,981.00 44744 5/30/2018 000202 SRCAA 11183 001.090.000.553 2ND QTR 2018 ASSESSMENT 33,623.25 Total : 33,623.25 44745 5/30/2018 005918 STRATA 1NC SP180116-IN 309.000.237.595 0237-MATERIALS TESTING 1,307.50 Total : 1,307.50 44746 5/30/2018 006422 SUPPLYWORKS 436973069 001.033.000.518 SUPPLIES: JANITORIAL CITY HALL 452.38 Total : 452.38 44747 5/30/2018 001206 SWANSON'S REFRIGERATION &, RESTA 155916 001.076.305.575 WORK ORDER FOR CENTERPLAC 389.97 Total : 389.97 44748 5/30/2018 006071 TAX RECOVERY SERVICES LLC 1066 101.042.000.316 UTILITY TAX AUDIT 53,417.79 Total : 53,417.79 44749 5/30/2018 004740 THOMSON REUTERS-WEST 838153273 001.013.015.515 SUBSCRIPTION CHARGES 805.11 Total : 805.11 44750 5/30/2018 000717 TRANSPO GROUP 1NC. 21555 303.000.259.595 0259-ENGINEERING SVCS 18,067.95 21764 303.000.259.595 0259-ENGINEERING SVCS 1,814.86 Total : 19,882.81 44751 5/30/2018 003175 VISIT SPOKANE April 2018 105.000.000.557 2018 LODGING TAX GRANT REIMB 5,833.34 Total : 5,833.34 44752 5/30/2018 006585 WINKLER, CHRISTOPHER BLD-2017-1414 001.040.043.322 PERMIT REFUND: BLD-2017-1414 650.72 Total : 650.72 44753 5/30/2018 002651 WOODARD,ARNE Expenses 001.011.000.511 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 55.05 Page: vchlist Voucher List Page: /f 05130/2018 1:03:09PM Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 44753 5/30/2018 002651 002651 WOODARD,ARNE (Continued) Total : 55.05 45 Vouchers for bank code : apbank Bank total : 182,854.86 45 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers : 182,854.86 I,the undersigned,do certify under penalty of perjury, that the materials have been furnished,the services rendered, or the labor performed as described herein and that the claim is just,due and an unpaid obligation against the City of Spokane Valley, and that i am authorized to authenticate and certify said claim. Finance Director Date Council member reviewed: Mayor Date Council Member Date Page: vchlist Voucher List Page: --1--- 05/31/2018 10:30:54AM Spokane Valley Bank code : plc-ref Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 7610 5/31/2018 006591 AGP WEALTH ADVISORS PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: ROOM 109 52.00 Total : 52.00 7611 5/31/2018 006592 BUCHANAN, TAMBI PARKS REFUND 001237.10.99 CANCELLATION REFUND: MIRABE. 457.00 Total : 457.00 7612 5/31/2018 006593 CAPELLO, WENDY PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 CANCELLATION REFUND: GREAT F 500.00 Total : 500.00 7613 5/31/2018 006594 DOW, LARRY PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: GREENACRES 75.00 Total : 75.00 7614 5/31/2018 006595 ELLIS, DON PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: MIRABEAU MEQ 75.00 Total : 75.00 7615 5/31/2018 006596 FLETCHER, NATHAN PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 SUMMER DAY CAMP REFUND: 7/2: 236.00 Total : 236.00 7616 5/31/2018 006597 LUX, LINDA PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: MIRABEAU MEd 75.00 Total : 75.00 7617 5/31/2018 006598 MEYER, JENNIFER PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: FIRESIDE LOUI 210.00 Total : 210.00 7618 5/31/2018 006287 NORTHEAST YOUTH CENTER PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: GREAT ROOM 210.00 Total : 210.00 7619 5/31/2018 004980 NORTHWEST AUTISM CENTER PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: ROOM 216 52.00 Total : 52.00 7620 5/31/2018 006599 NUCA OF EASTERN WA-NORTH IDAHO PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: ROOM 212 52.00 Total : 52.00 7621 5/31/2018 006600 PAPPAS, D1NA PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: FIRESIDE LOUI 210.00 Total : 210.00 7622 5/31/2018 006601 PATTERSON, BILL PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: FIRESIDE LOUI 210.00 Page: fly vchlist Voucher List Page: 05/31/2018 10:30:54AM Spokane Valley Bank code : pk-ref Voucher Date Vendor invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 7622 5/31/2018 006601 006601 PATTERSON, BILL (Continued) Total : 210.00 7623 5/31/2018 006602 PNW KEY CLUB PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: ROOM 109 52.00 Total : 52.00 7624 5/31/2018 006603 POWERFUL CONNECTIONS NOW PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: ROOM 109 449.00 Total : 449,00 7625 5/31/2018 006604 RIORDAN, COURTNEY PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND:TERRACE VIEV 75.00 Total : 75.00 7626 5/31/2018 006605 RUDNEV, DANIIL PARKS REFUND 001237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: GREAT ROOM/: 500.00 Total : 500.00 7627 5/31/2018 006606 SPOKANE GYMNASTICS PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: MIRABEAU ME, 75.00 Total : 75.00 7628 5/31/2018 006607 STEM CELL CENTERS PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: ROOM 216 52.00 Total : 52.00 7629 5/31/2018 006608 SYNGHAL, MUDIT PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: ROOM 109 22.00 Total : 22.00 7630 5/31/2018 006609 USTIMENKO,ALEX PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 CANCELLATION REFUND: GREAT f 500.00 Total : 500.00 7631 5/31/2018 006610 WHIPPLE CONSULTING ENGINEERS PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: ROOM 109 52.00 Total : 52.00 7632 5/31/2018 006025 WINDERMERE MARATHON PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: MIRABEAU ME 300.00 Total : 300.00 7633 5/31/2018 006611 WISE, LORI PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: FIRESIDE LOUI 210.00 Total : 210.00 7634 5/31/2018 006612 YANGA,ARLIE PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 CANCELLATION REFUND: EDGECL 243.00 Total : 243.00 7635 5/31/2018 006613 YOUNG, JENNIFER PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: FIRESIDE LOUI 210.00 Page: 2-- vchlist Voucher List Page: /K-3'- 05/31/2018 10:30:54AM Spokane Valley Bank code : pk-ref Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 7635 5/31/2018 006613 006613 YOUNG, JENNIFER (Continued) Total : 210.00 26 Vouchers for bank code : pk-ref Bank total : 5,154.00 26 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers : 5,154.00 I,the undersigned,do certify under penalty of perjury, that the materials have been furnished,the services rendered, or the labor performed as described herein and that the claim is just,due and an unpaid obligation against the City of Spokane Valley,and that I am authorized to authenticate and certify said claim. Finance Director Date Council member reviewed: Mayor Date Council Member Date Page: �$� DRAFT MINUTES SPOKANE VALLEY COUNCIL MEETING STUDY SESSION Spokane Valley City Hall Council Chambers Spokane Valley,Washington May 15,2018 Attendance: Councilmembers Staff Rod Higgins,Mayor Mark Calhoun,City Manager Pam Haley,Deputy Mayor Cary Driskell, City Attorney Brandi Peetz, Councilmember Chelsie Taylor,Finance Director Linda Thompson, Councilmember Mike Stone,Parks&Rec Director Ben Wick, Councilmember Gloria Mantz,Engineering Manager Sam Wood, Councilmember Lori Barlow, Senior Planner Arne Woodard, Councilmember Bill Helbig, City Engineer Colin Quinn-Hurst, Sr.Transportation Planner Mike Basinger,Eco. Dev.Manager Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Mayor Higgins called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. ROLL CALL: City Clerk Bainbridge called the roll; all Councilmembers were present. ACTION ITEMS: 1.Motion Consideration: Bid Award,Mission Ave. Improvement Project—Craig Aldworth,Gloria Mantz It was moved by Deputy Mayor Haley and seconded to award the Mission Avenue Improvement Project, CIP 0123 to MDM Construction, Inc., in the amount of$2,966,440.40 and authorize the City Manager to finalize and execute the construction contract. After Engineering Manager Mantz briefed Council on this bid award,Mayor Higgins invited public comment. No comments were offered. Vote by Acclamation: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed:None. Motion carried. NON-ACTION ITEMS: 2. Spokane County Continuum of Care—Patrick Stretch, and Pamela Tietz Mr. Patrick Stretch, Community Development Specialist with the Spokane County Community Services, Housing and Community Development; and Ms. Pam Tietz, Executive Director for Spokane Housing Authority,via their PowerPoint,explained about the Continuum of Care for the Homeless;they mentioned the parts of Continuum of Care,what it does and how it works; that the Continuum of Care (CoC)submits a single application for McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Grants to streamline the funding application process and to encourage coordination of housing and services. They spoke of the Board and membership structure, and said they are here tonight to ask for a Spokane Valley Elected Official to consider joining as a member of the Board. Ms. Tietz went over the goals, vision, mission and key responsibilities of the Board, followed by Mr. Stretch discussing some of the reasons for having a representative from Spokane Valley, and added that the time commitment is not large as the Board usually meets the last Wednesday of the month, from 3:30 to 5:00 at the Goodwill Store on Second avenue. Discussion ensued regarding the purpose of the Board and the reasons for a Spokane Valley elected official to participate as a board member, which reasons were included in the PowerPoint slides; and it was ultimately agreed by Council that Spokane Valley should be represented by an elected official. City Manager Calhoun said this will be scheduled for an appointment on the May 29 agenda, with a recommendation by the Mayor and confirmation by Council. Council agreed. Council Study Session:05-15-2018 Page 1 of 2 Approved by Council: DRAFT 3. Proposed 2019-2024 Six Year Transportation Improvement Program(TIP)—Colin Quinn-Hurst Mr. Quinn-Hurst went over the various projects included in the 2019-2024 proposed Six Year Transportation Improvement Program;he noted those projects were divided into types of projects for easier viewing and explanation,such as the intersection improvement projects,Barker corridor projects,sidewalk and trail projects, reconstruction/preservation projects, grade separation projects, and bridge projects. It was noted this will be back to Council June 5 for a public hearing and a resolution for adoption consideration by Council. 4. Duplex/Single Family Dwellings—Lori Barlow Senior Planner Barlow explained that Council had requested a discussion concerning duplex regulations; she explained the difference between single family versus duplex as defined in our Municipal Code as well as in the Washington Administrative Code; she mentioned the reasons why duplexes are allowed in single family neighborhoods, and went over some of the scale and character of single family, duplex,townhouse and multifamily; she also noted the City's zoning map showing zones that allow single family and duplex; and discussed lot size as per our Code's development regulations. Ms. Barlow also showed how our regulations compare with those of Spokane County, Liberty Lake, and Spokane City; and went over some of the regional trends concerning number of duplex permits over the past few years. Councilmembers Woodard and Wood asked about zero lot lines, and Ms. Barlow said that is an entirely different topic,but that topic can be brought later if Council desires. Council thanked Ms. Barlow for her presentation. 5. Advance Agenda—Mayor Higgins There were no suggested changes to the Advance Agenda. 6. Information Only: Support Letter for Heritage Museum's Grant Application 7. Council Check-in—Mayor Higgins n/a 8. City Manager Comments—Mark Calhoun City Manager Calhoun mentioned the support letter under tonight's agenda item #6; that the Heritage Museum had asked for a letter of support, and of their impending deadline. Mr. Calhoun also reminded everyone of the Mayor's State of the City address set for next Wednesday, May 23, at CenterPlace, from 8-9 a.m.with doors opening at 7:45 a.m. Mr. Calhoun also mentioned that on the Council dais is a copy of a draft letter to Mike Gribner,Eastern Regional Administrator for WSDOT,thanking him and his staff for helping secure funding for our Barker Board/BNSF Grade Separation Project; and if Council agrees, this letter will be mailed out under Mayor Higgins' signature. Council concurred. Mr. Calhoun said that we were contacted by FMSIB concerning two projects we had applied for funding, and that we were selected to be interviewed for both projects, which interviews were to take place today. Other items of note, Mr. Calhoun mentioned the upcoming annual budget workshop June 12, 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m., and of the cancellation of that evening's Council meeting; and that as Councilmembers will be attending the AWC Conference,the June 26 Council meeting will also be cancelled. It was moved by Deputy Mayor Haley, seconded and unanimously agreed to adjourn. The meeting adjourned at 7:29 p.m. ATTEST: L.R. Higgins,Mayor Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Council Study Session:05-15-2018 Page 2 of 2 Approved by Council: CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: June 5, 2018 Department Director Approval: El Check all that apply: [' consent ❑ old business ® new business [' public hearing ❑ information [' admin. report [' pending legislation [' executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: First Reading Proposed Ordinance 18-012 amending SVMC 19.60.050 and SVMC 19.65.080, Hotel/Motel in Industrial Zone GOVERNING LEGISLATION: SVMC 17.80.150; 19.30.040; and RCW 36.70A.106 PREVIOUS ACTION TAKEN: Administrative Report May 22, 2018 BACKGROUND: CTA 2018-0002 is a privately-initiated code text amendment to amend chapters 19.60 and 19.65 SVMC to outright permit hotels/motels in the Industrial(I)zoning district with a building footprint up to 25,000 square feet, and to permit hotels/motels with a footprint greater than 25,000 square feet subject to a Conditional Use Permit(CUP). SVMC 19.60.050,Permitted Use Matrix,identifies the uses that are permitted in each of the zoning districts. Hotel/motel uses are not a permitted use in the"I"zoning district as indicated by a blank cell in the permitted use matrix. The applicant has requested an amendment to the matrix which will permit hotel/motel uses in the "I" zoning district with the application of supplemental use regulations described in SVMC 19.65.080. The proposed amendment would amend SVMC 19.65.080, Supplemental Use regulations. Language would be added to the section to outright permit a hotel/motel use with a building footprint up to 25,000 square feet in the Industrial zoning district on parcels with frontage on a principal arterial. A hotel/motel use with a building footprint greater than 25,000 square feet on a parcel with frontage on a principal arterial would be allowed in the Industrial zoning district subject to the approval of a CUP. The Planning Commission conducted a study session on April 12, 2018 and a public hearing on April 26, 2018 to consider the amendments. Following the public hearing and deliberations, the Planning Commission voted 5-2 to recommend that the proposed code text amendment be approved with staff recommended changes. On May 10,2018,the Planning Commission approved the Findings of Fact and Recommendation to City Council. OPTIONS: Move to advance Ordinance 18-012 to a second reading with or without further amendments; or take other action deemed appropriate. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to advance Ordinance 18-012 amending zoning regulations to a second reading. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: N/A STAFF CONTACT: Martin Palaniuk, Planner ATTACHMENTS: A. Draft Ordinance 18-012 E. PC Meeting Minutes 05/10/2018 B. Planning Commission's Findings and Recommendations F. Staff Report CTA-2018-0002 C. PC Meeting Minutes 4/12/2018 D. PC Meeting Minutes 4/26/2018 DRAFT CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY SPOKANE COUNTY,WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 18-012 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON AMENDING SPOKANE VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 19.60 RELATED TO USES PERMITTED IN THE INDUSTRIAL ZONE,AND SPOKANE VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 19.65 RELATED TO LODGING IN THE INDUSTRIAL ZONE,AND OTHER MATTERS RELATING THERETO. WHEREAS, the City of Spokane Valley (City) previously adopted Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) Title 19,relating to zoning regulations, and has made subsequent amendments from time- to-time as appropriate; and WHEREAS, such regulations are authorized by RCW 36.70A; and WHEREAS, on April 6 and 13, 2018, notice of the Planning Commission public hearing was published in the Valley News Herald; and WHEREAS,on April 12,2018,the Planning Commission held a study session relating to proposed amendments to chapters 19.60 and 19.65 SVMC relating to siting hotel/motel uses in Industrially-zoned areas; and WHEREAS,on April 26,2018,the Planning Commission held a public hearing,received evidence, information,public testimony, and a staff report with a recommendation followed by deliberations; and WHEREAS,on May 10,2018,the Planning Commission approved the findings and recommended that City Council adopt the amendments; and WHEREAS, on May 22, 2018, City Council reviewed the proposed amendments, Planning Commission findings, and Planning Commission recommendation. City Council determined it desired to consider adopting the amendments; and WHEREAS, on May 23, 2018, the Washington State Department of Commerce was notified pursuant to RCW 36.70A.106.3.b, providing a notice of intent to adopt amendments to Spokane Valley development regulations; and WHEREAS,the amendment set forth below is consistent with the goals and policies of the City's Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, SVMC 19.60 and 19.65, as amended, bears a substantial relationship to the public health, safety,welfare and protection of the environment. NOW,THEREFORE,the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley ordains as follows: Section 1. Purpose. The purpose of this Ordinance is to amend chapter 19.60 SVMC, Permitted Uses to allow the hotel/motel use in the industrial(I)zoning district subject to supplemental use regulations; and to amend chapter 19.65 SVMC adding supplemental use regulations for the hotel/motel use in the I zoning district. Ordinance 18-012 Page 1 of 4 DRAFT Section 2. Findings and Conclusions. The City Council acknowledges that the Planning Commission conducted appropriate investigation and study, held a public hearing on the proposed amendments and recommends approval of the amendments. The City Council has read and considered the Planning Commission's findings. The City Council hereby makes the following findings: A. Growth Management Act Policies - Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA) provides that each city shall adopt a comprehensive land use plan and development regulations that are consistent with and implement the comprehensive plan. B. City of Spokane Valley Goals and Policies-The City of Spokane Valley has adopted goals and policies consistent with the GMA and adopted County-Wide Planning Policies, set forth below. Goal ED-G1: Support economic opportunities and employment growth for Spokane Valley. Goal ED-G4: Collaborate with relevant economic development stakeholders, including the business community, to grow a strong and healthy regional economy. Goal ED-G5: Support and encourage the development of a strong workforce that is globally competitive and responds to the changing needs of the workplace. Goal ED-G6: Maintain a positive business climate that strives for flexibility, predictability and stability. Goal LU-G3: Support the transformation of commercial, industrial, and mixed— use areas into accessible districts that attract economic activity. Goal LU-G4: Ensure that land use plans, regulations, review processes, and infrastructure improvements support economic growth and vitality. Goal LU-P12: Maintain a robust supply of productive industrial land. C. Conclusions The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to public health,safety, welfare,and protection of the environment. The proposed City-initiated Code text amendments are consistent with the City's adopted Comprehensive Plan and the approval criteria pursuant to SVMC 17.80.150(F). Ordinance 18-012 Page 2 of 4 DRAFT Section 3. Amendment. SVMC 19.60.050 is hereby amended as follows: Parks and Commercia Open Residential Mixed Use 1 Industrial Space R-1 R-2 R-3 MFR MU CMU NC RC IMU I POS Agriculture and Animal Animal processing/handling P Animal raising and/or keeping SSS S S S Animal shelter S P P Beekeeping,commercial P Beekeeping,hobby S S S Community garden SSS S S S S Greenhouse/nursery,commercial P P P Kennel S S S S P P Orchard, tree farming, commercial P P Riding stable P P C Lodging Bed and breakfast PPPP P Hotel/motel P P P P S Recreational vehicle S park/campground Ordinance 18-012 Page 3 of 4 DRAFT Section 4. Amendment. SVMC 19.65.080 is hereby amended as follows: 19.65.080 Lodging A. Recreation Vehicle Park/Campground 1. The maximum net units per acre shall be 15; 2. Recreational vehicle stalls shall average 1,500 square feet; 3.Accessory uses including management headquarters,recreational facilities,restrooms,dumping stations, showers, laundry facilities, and other uses and structures customarily incidental to operation of a recreational vehicle park are permitted as accessory uses. 4. A minimum of 15 percent of the gross site shall be set aside and developed as common use areas for open or enclosed recreational facilities. Recreational vehicle stalls, private streets, storage,utility sites,and off-street parking areas shall not be counted as meeting this requirement; and 5. The recreational vehicle park shall meet all Spokane Regional Health District and City regulations regarding sewage and water. B. Hotel/Motel in Industrial Zone: A hotel/motel use is allowed in the "I" zoning district on sites with frontage on a Principal Arterial. If the proposed hotel/motel use has a building footprint greater than 25,000 square feet, a conditional use permit pursuant to 19.150 SVMC is required. Section 5. Other sections unchanged. All other provisions of Title 19 SVMC not specifically referenced hereto shall remain in full force and effect. Section 6. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance shall be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section,sentence,clause,or phrase of this Ordinance. Section 7. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect five days after publication of this Ordinance or a summary thereof in the official newspaper of the City of Spokane Valley as provided by law. Passed by the City Council this day of ,2018. ATTEST: L.R. Higgins,Mayor Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Approved as to form: Office of the City Attorney Date of Publication: Effective Date: Ordinance 18-012 Page 4 of 4 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE SPOKANE VALLEY PLANNING COMMISSION CTA-2018-0002—Proposed Amendment to Spokane Valley Municipal Code(SVMC) Pursuant to SVMC 17,80.150(E)the Planning Commission shall consider the proposal and shall prepare and forward a recommendation to the City Council following the public hearing. The following findings are consistent with the Planning Commission recommendation that City Council adopt the amendment. Background: 1. Pursuant to RCW 36.70A.130, Spokane Valley adopted its 2016 Comprehensive Plan Update and updated development regulations on December 13,2016,with December 28,2016 as the effective date, 2. CTA-2018-0002 is a privately initiated code text amendment to SVMC 19.60.050 and SVMC 19,65,080 to allow a hotel/motel in the Industrial zone on sites with frontage on a principal arterial subject to a conditional use permit (CUP) only if the building footprint exceeds 25,000 square feet. Staff provided alternative proposed amendment language that is more congruent with the language and organization of the SVMC,but that is substantively the same. 3. The Planning Commission held a properly noticed public hearing and conducted deliberations on April 26, 2018. The Commissioners voted 5-2 to recommend that the City Council adopt the amendment using the alternative language proposed by staff. Planning Commission Findings: 1. Recommended Modifications The Planning Commission recommended approval of the proposed amendments as revised by staff and attached in Exhibit 1. 2. Compliance with SVMC 17.80.150(F)Approval Criteria a. The proposed text amendment is consistent with the applicable provisions of the Comprehensive Plan: Findings: Goal ED-G1: Support economic opportunities and employment growth for Spokane Valley. Goal ED-G4: Collaborate with relevant economic development stakeholders, including the business community,to grow a strong and healthy regional economy; Goal ED-G5: Support and encourage the development of a strong workforce that is globally competitive and responds to the changing needs of the workplace. Goal ED-G6: Maintain a positive business climate that strives for flexibility,predictability and stability. Goal LU-G3: Support the transformation of commercial,industrial,and mixed—use areas into accessible districts that attract economic activity; Goal LU-G4: Ensure that land use plans,regulations,review processes,and infrastructure improvements support economic growth and vitality. Goal LU-P12: Maintain a robust supply of productive industrial land. Findings and Recommendations of the Spokane Valley Planning Commission CTA-2018-0002 Page 1 of 2 b. The proposed amendment bears a substantial relation to public health,safety,welfare and protection of the environment. Findings: The amendment bears substantial relation to public health,safety,welfare and protection os the environment. The hotel/motel use in close proximity to the job locations in the industrial area adds a level of convenience that is currently not available to the people who travel to the area and spend the preponderance of their time working in the industrial area. Additionally the hotel/motel use provides a positive economic impact to businesses in the area and to the citizens of Spokane Valley. 3. Conclusion: The proposed text amendment is consistent with Comprehensive Plan and bears a substantial relation to public health,safety,welfare,and protection of the environment. 4. Recommendation: The Spokane Valley Planning Commission therefore recommends the City Council approve CTA-2018- 0002 as modified. Attachments: Exhibit 1—Proposed Amendment CTA-2018-0002 Approved this 10th day of May,2018 Planning Commission Chairman ATTEST Deanna Horton,Administrative Assistant Findings and Recommendations of the Spokane Valley Planning Commission CTA-2010-0002 Page 2 of 2 Minutes Spokane'Valley Planning Comnrissionr Council Chambers—City Hall April 12,2018 I. Chair Rasmussen called the meeting to order at 6:02 p.m. Commissioners,staff and audience stood for the pledge of allegiance, Secretary Deanna I lotion took roll and the following members and staff were present: James Johnson Cory Driskell,City Attorney Danielle l(aschmitter,absent,excused Lori Barlow,Senior Planner Tim Kelley Jenny Nickerson,Assistant Building Official Mike Phillips Henry Allen,Engineer Michelle Rasmussen Marty Palaniuk, Planner Suzanne Staihos,absent-excused Matt Walton Deanna Horton,Secretary for the Commission Hearing no objections,Commissioners Stathos and Kasehrnitter wore excused from the April 12,2018 meeting. IL AGENDA:Commissioner Johnson moved to accept the April 12,2018 agenda as presented. The vote on the motion was five in f ivor;zero against and the motion passed. HI. MINUTES:Commissioner Johnson moved to approve the March 22,2018 minutes as presented. The vote on the motion was jiw in favor, zero against and the motion passed. 1V. COMMISSION REPORTS:The Commissioners had no reports. V. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT: Senior Planner Lori Barlow explained the open space in the mixed use zones discussion was not on the agenda for the evening,as it had been moved in the minutes, the City had been anticipating the decision to the SEPA appeal for CPA-2018-0003. Shc said there had been a scheduling issue for the hearing on the SEPA appeal and the hearing had taken place on March • 27, 2018. Once the decision regarding the SEPA appeal is received, the Comprehensive Plan Amendments would he returned to the agenda. The open space discussion would he placed on the agenda subject to the Comprehensive Plan Amendment deliberations. VI. PUBLIC COMMENT:There was no public comment. VII. COMMISSION BUSINESS: I. Study Session: CTA-2018-0002, A privately initiated code text amendment to the Spokane Valley Municipal Code to allow lodging in the Industrial zone. Planner Marty Palaniuk presented to the Commission an overview of the privately initiated amendment requesting to add lodging as a supplemental use to the Industrial zone. Mr. Palaniuk explaiined lodging is a permitted use in the Mixed Use,Corridor Mixed Use,Regional Commercial,. and Industrial Mixed Use zones. The proposal requests to add a 'P/C' in for permitted or conditional use permit in the supplemental language for the Industrial zone in the Permitted Use Matrix. The supplemental language would state that the hotel/motel would need to have frontage on a principal arterial and if the building footprint were greater than 25,000 square feet, a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) would be required. He mentioned that staff had reviewed the language proposed and if the Commission recommends approval of the proposal,revised language would be recommended that was consistent with the language and format of the SVMC. The staff revision suggested an "S" in the Permitted Use Matrix, which references the Supplemental Use Regulations; it is further suggested that the supplemental language be placed under the Lodging heading,rather than the industrial heading. All staff suggested revisions are non-substantive to the proposed language, Mr. Palaniuk said there are only three areas in the City this proposal would apply to, in the east along Broadway Avenue in the Yardley urea,north attic,river along Sullivan and north of the river along Barker. Barker is not currently classified as a principal arterial, but there are plans to reclassify it in the future. Much of the urea along Broadway would be restricted because it fulls 2018.04 42 Planning Commission Minutes singe 201'3 under an airport hazard overlay and high intensity uses, such as a hotel are not permitted in an airport hazard zone. in looking at other jurisdictions, Pasco and Richland allow hotels in their heavy industrial zones. Spokane allows it with a CUP,Spokane County only in light industrial, Kennewick does not allow hotels in an industrial zone, but in a Business Park zone, and federal Way allows the use in a Commercial Enterprise zone. Yakima and Liberty Lake do not allow them in any industrial zone. A Conditional Use Permit is heard by the Hearing Examiner. Ile reviews them case by ease and can impose conditions based on the impacts to the su►i'ounding development. Commissioner Johnson asked how the 25,000 square foot number was chosen. Mr. Palaniuk replied this was the number the applicant proposed. Most°tribe smaller hotels in the urea are under this footprint based on research Mr.Palanluk had done,except for the Mirabeau Hotel. Commissioner Walton asked if there was a specific project proposed. Ms.Barlow stated no project has been submitted since It currently is not on allowed use. Commissioner Rasmussen confirmed that Barker Road is currently not a principal arterial now,but that there are plans to reclassify it in the future. if. Study Session:FEMA Floodplain review processes Engineer Henry Allen presented to the Commissioners the process for how to modify a FEMA floodplain. The City has six Special Flood Hazard Areas(S FHA)or 100-year floodplairns. These are areas having a I%annual chance in any given year to flood. Currently four of them are under review,Porker Draw,Saltese/Shelley Lake,Central Park and Glenrose. Development can occur in a floodplain and changes to the floodplain boundaries can change based on development, topography changes,mapping errors and proposed changes to the boundaries. Mr.Allen explained several scenarios where the floodplain can be changed. All changes need to be based on current conditions and supported by scientific data. A homeowner could prepare materials and submit to FEMA to have their structure removed from the floodplain because the home is above the Base Flood Elevation(BFE). The documentation is prepared and sent to FEMA for review. Then FEMA determines if it mete the criteria and sends back a determination. These do not change the map and takes two to three months. These are Letter of Map Amendments (LOMA or LOMA-F if fill has been used). If a development wants to build in the floodplain,they prepare the necessary documents,explain what they are going to build,how they will mitigate the floodplain, prepare engineering analysis and send it to FEMA for review and comment. They receive a Conditional Letter of Map Amendment(CLOMR). Alter the development is built,they send the as-hunts are sent to FEMA. If the as-buills are the same as the proposed information,then FEMA sends back a Letter of Map Amendment and the map is changed. This can take several months or years, depending on the scale.The Porker Draw Alluvial Fan started scoping in 2010 and the property owner received the CLOMR March 15,2018. Developments can change the map by bringing in fill to mitigate the floodwaters,this is referred to by a Letter of Map Amendment based on Fill or a CLOMR-F,if the`-F' is on the and,it is based on additional till being brought into the site as a mitigation measure. When the map has topographical and scientific data discrepancies, data is collected, engineering studies are conducted,and reviewed. Information is then sent to FEMA for review and comment. Then the Map is updated. This can take several years. Salton Creek/Plats to Shelley Lake began in 2010 and sent to FEMA for review and comment on March 8,2018. VIII. GOOD OF THE ORDER:There was nothing for the good of the order. • 2018.04.12 Planning Commission Minnles Pane 3 ora IX. X. ADJOURNMENT: Commissioner Johnson moved to adjourn the matting at 7;06 p.m. The vote on the motion teas unanimous tri fitiAnr, the motion passed L4 - Mioliolic Rasniusscn, ChairDate signed 141eafbeila_*44(..` Deanna Norton, Secrctaiy • APPROVED Minutes Spokane Valley Planning Commission Council Chambers--City Hall April 26,2018 I. Chair Rasmussen called the meeting to order at 6:02 p.m. Commissioners,staff and audience stood for the pledge of allegiance. Secretary Deanna Horton took roll and the following members and staff were present: James Johnson Erik Lamb,Deputy City Attorney Danielle Kasobmitter Lori Barlow,Senior Planner Tim Kelley Jenny Nickerson,Assistant Building Official Mike Phillips Marty Palaniuk,Planner Michelle Rasmussen Suzanne Stathos Matt.Walton Deanna Horton, Secretary for the Commission II. AGENDA: Commissioner Johnson moved to accept the April 26,2018 agenda as presented. The vote on the motion was seven in favor,zero against and the motion passed III. MINUTES: Commissioner Johnson moved to approve the April 12, 2018 minutes as presented. The vote on the motion way seven in favor, zero against and the motion passed IV. COMMISSION REPORTS: The Commissioners had no reports. V. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT: Senior Planner Lori Barlow informed the Commission the City had received the decision on the appeal of the SEPA decision for the Comprehensive Plan. Amendment CPA-2018-0003. The Hearing Examiner had upheld the City's determination and denied the applicant's appeal. There had not been enough time for staff to prepare for the Comprehensive Plan Amendments for the Planning Commission packet for this meeting so staff will prepare materials for deliberations to continue on May 24,2018. VI. PUBLIC COMMENT: There was no public comment. VII. COMMISSION BUSINESS: i. Public Hearing: CTA-2018-0002,A privately initiated code text amendment to the Spokane Valley Municipal Code 19.60 and 19.65 to allow lodging in the Industrial zone. Chair Rasmussen opened the public hearing for CTA-2018-0002 at 6:03 p.m. Planner Marty Palaniuk presented to the Commission an overview of the privately initiated code text amendment requesting to add hotel/motel as a supplemental use to the Industrial zone. Mr. Palaniuk explained hotel/motel is a permitted use in the Mixed Use,Corridor Mixed Use, Regional Commercial, and Industrial Mixed Use zones. The Industrial zone allows for all types of manufacturing and industrial type uses. The amendment proposes to allow hotels/motels along principal arterials on a parcel which has frontage along a principal arterial. Mr.Palaniuk said there are three areas in the City this proposal would apply to, Broadway Avenue west of the Interstate, north of Interstate 90 along Sullivan and north of the river along Barker. Barker is not currently classified as a principal arterial,but there are plans to reclassify it in the future. These are the areas along a principal arterial which are zoned Industrial. Much of the area along Broadway would be restricted because it falls under an airport hazard overlay zone (AHO) and high intensity uses like a hotel are those which draw and concentrate people into a certain areas and are not permitted in a AHO zone. There is a small area along Broadway which is outside of the AHO zone which would be available for this proposal. Commissioner Phillips confirmed the AHO was because of the proximity to Felts Field, but wanted to know why it didn't apply to the Spokane International Airport(SIA). Commissioner I(elley offered the hotels at SIA are not in the crash zone,and are allowed to build where they based on their location to those zones. The applicant's proposal requests to add a `PIC' in for permitted or conditional use permit in the supplemental language for the Industrial zone in the Permitted Use Matrix. Staff is recommending that an 'S' be placed in the Permitted Use Matrix which would reference the supplemental use 2018-04-26 Planning Commission Minutes Page 2 of 5 regulations. Staff also made some suggests instead of placing the use in the Heavy Industrial section of the Use Matrix placing it in under the Lodging heading,along with some minor language changes to make sure it was in line with the way the rest of our code is written. Staff discussed requiring a Conditional Use Permit(CUP)and most of the conditions covered by a CUP would be handled by existing regulations from the Building Code, environmental regulations, SEPA, etc. Ms. Barlow stated although staff has made some minor changes to the language of the proposal in order to make the proposal more consistent with City code but staff did not made a recommendation on the proposal itself. If the Planning Commission recommends approval of the amendment staff would propose accepting the minor revisions as well. The Choir opened the hearing for public testimony Steve Sclunautz, Spokane WA: Mr. Sehmautz stated he was the applicant for CTA-2018-0002 and principal on the project for the former ITRON site located on Sullivan Road. He stated they are working to develop the 12-acre site into a higher level use with 150,000 square feet of office space, 110,000 square feet of high cube warehouse space, The plan is to.develop an extended-stay business type hotel similar to others in the area. He said has had studies done and there is a demand for this use. He said the product he would be offering would have a different price point,something complimenting the area which is growing northward. What they are considering putting on their site would be less than the footprint in their amendment, catering to sales/business people who service the area,convenient,affordable, more suites,and larger spaces. Commissioner Stathos inquired regarding the campus layout, and Mr. Schmautz stated it would have a bit of everything,office, commercial, warehouse and convenience in the same place on an arterial,Ms.Barlow reminded the Commissioners this was not a project specific,and would affect more than this proposal. Commissioner Walton commented one arguments in the application for the proposal was to reduce trip generation. He wondered how it would do this when many of the other services which hotel patrons need are outside of the industrial areas. Mr. Sehmautz said he has been doing this for a while and the trips would mostly concentrate where the work was near the offices and warehousing facilities. Dwight Hume,Mead,WA: Mr. Hume said he represents the applicant for CTA-2018-0002. Mr. Hume stated he remembers when the hotel currently the Industrial Park was built. He commented the need for it was created by the tenants of the park. He believed the Industrial Park had to have a change to the code at that time to allow the hotel,because the Industrial Park needed the facility, and it wasn't allowed until the code was corrected. Corporate visitors could be coming to visit or do training for businesses right in the general area and are less populated on the weekends. He said the hotel would be a convenience to the surrounding businesses which would use it services but the clients would use other services in the area such as restaurants and shopping. He commented that the proposal was requested to be on an arterial so it would handle trip generations and ingress/egress issues. Commissioner Kelley asked Mr. Hume to share his background with the Commission. Mr. Hume is currently a private land use consultant, but spent many years working for Spokane County as their planning director and as a zoning adjustor, which is like a hearing examiner now. Commissioner Johnson asked Mr. Hume how he felt about changing the proposal to require the project to have frontage on a principal arterial instead of the parcel being on a principal arterial, Commissioner Johnson said he was concerned about a structure being located deep inside a parcel where 1'1 responders would have trouble finding it. Mr.Hume responded the street system would feed to the arterial,but that would be specific to this site. Each site would be different and need its own ingress and egress onto the arterial. He felt there are enough performance standards and development reviews to be able to discover a problem before the doors are opened. Mr.Hume also said other jurisdictions have a CUP process when siting a hotel in an industrial area. Many times the criteria for a CUP has already been met, so he does not know why people should have to go through the process. Ms. Barlow commented the way the language is written a CUP would only be necessary of the proposal was for a building footprint greater than 25,000 square feet. If they did not want to go through the CUP process, it would require the project to be designed to go vertical and protect the valuable industrial space. Mr.Hume stated he wasn't against them,he just 2018-04-26 Planning Commission Minutes Page 3 of 5 feels the criteria is covered in other ways. Commissioner Walton asked why the applicant did not rezone the property to Corridor Mixed Use with all of the allowed uses which would be allowed in the CMU zone. Mr. Hume replied the applicant is not trying to bring the CMU uses into the industrial area, they simply want to bring a hotel use into the industrial zone. There is a demand for it and they felt this would be an appropriate request. Ms. Barlow the intent of the Industrial zone is to provide for industrial uses and allow for some accessory uses,so environment is created where it thrives. The intent of the CMU zone is to allow for uses which are much less intensive. If it was rezoned, it would be stripped of one of the amenities the property offers. It could also be argued the property was spot zoned and surrounding properties have not been given the same rights to the uses allowed in the CMU zone. The proposal brings forward the hotel as an accessory to the Industrial zone instead of stripping those uses and adding uses which might not be compatible with the surrounding area. Chair Rasmussen seeing no one else who wished to testify closed the public hearing at 6;50 p.m. Commissioner Walton asked Commissioner Johnson about his expressed concern regarding not having a hotel which fronted on a principal arterial. Commissioner Johnson said it might be better, as Mr. Hume had stated,to have the access on a side road. The customers might be going out once or twice a day to somewhere up and down the arterial,but he feels the language should change in order to keep the project out on the arterial so first responders are not having to drive around in the Industrial Park. Commissioner Walton stated he was a bit concerned that this could amount to telling someone how to develop their property. Commissioner Phillips stated he felt having a having hotel in the industrial area was a good idea. He commented developers will build a hotel where it would be most advantageous to them and would not put it off the arterial unless they were catering to a select few clients. He is content with the language the way it is. Commissioner Kelley commented generating more trips are what we want because it means that people are coming to the City and spending money. There would revenue from the rooms,food and beverage, payroll,federal, state and local taxes, sales taxes, payroll taxes, lodging taxes,jobs would be created from the construction,from the new business, more suppliers in the area would spend more money and the employees themselves there by increasing economic development. Commissioner Kelley said he was concerned about making the hotel right on the arterial because it could be a security concern if it was too easy to get to from the street. Commissioner Rasmussen said previously she traveled for work and she appreciated having the hotel next door to where she was going to work in the morning so she did not have to deal with the traffic. She said she felt this amendment would fit the needs of the of the specific business people who visit the area and she supported the amendment. She would leave it to the developers to determine where to put the structure based on their needs. Commissioner Stathos stated the area is adding conveniences for the businesses in the area. She would like to protect the industrial areas for those industrial uses but this is a need which would be beneficial to many businesses in this zone. Commissioner Kaschmitter stated she would support the amendment because she felt it would be good for business and the visitors to have the option. Commissioner Johnson also feels the change would be good for the City. He felt it would be a good addition to the industrial zone, he wanted to make sure there was sufficient protection of the industrial land. He said he was not in favor of a CUP. He wanted to protect staff from having to make any interpretations of the code. He wants the language to he specific so there is no misunderstanding. Commissioner Walton said he agreed and specific language allows for less interpretation and would be important to him. He is concerned that allowing an expansion of ause to this zone when there are hotels in the surrounding area which are not at capacity. He wanted to make sure that the industrial land is protected. Commissioner Walton stated his concern with the CUP process and how the hotels could be allowed with little control except for the amount of square footage. Commissioner Rasmussen and Kelley talked about their experiences in being in a hotel in more industrial areas and how they found them beneficial and how the users of the hotels would benefit the area. Commissioner Kelley is in favor of allowing the hotels, but is not necessarily in favor of a larger hotel, 25,000 square 2018-04-26 Planning Commission Minutes Page 4 of 5 feet,in the area. Commissioner Phillips said he was fine with a CUP for a hotel over 25,000 square feet footprint. Ms.Barlow wanted to remind the Commission when they made a recommendation,staff had made some suggested language to the amendment to make it more consistent with the way the Municipal Code is written. Commissioner Walton said his preference would be to eliminate a hotel greater than 25,000 would not be allowed in the industrial zone,so that it would preserve the most amount of land for those purposes. If someone wanted a larger hotel, then they would need to go vertical instead of horizontal in order to increase the amount of rooms they could offer. This would eliminate the CUP process. Commissioner Walton moved to recommend approval of CTA-2018-0002 to the City Council with the proposed changes from staff,but modifying the language in SVMC 19.65.080(B)(1)to read`A hotel/motel is allowed in the "1" zoning district on sites with frontage on a principal arterial provided hotellmotel use has a building footprint of 25,000 square feet or less.' Motion died for lack of a second. Commissioner Kelly moved to recommend approval of CTA-2018-0002 to the City Council as revised by staff. This motion was seconded. The vole on the motion by show of hands was five in favor., two against with Commissioners Johnson and Walton dissenting. ii. Study Session: Open Space Requirements in Mixed Use Zones. Ms. Barlow gave a quick presentation to remind the Commission the subject for discussion of the open space requirements in the mixed use zones. She also discussed that projects in mixed use zones which had been developed and stated all had provided some kind of open space. She also reviewed the requirements of other jurisdictions and most have some form open space requirements, She also shared several examples of mixed use development. The code currently requires any development,multifamily or mixed use,in a mixed use zone would require open space to be provided at a rate of 210 square feet per unit for any development which has more than 10 un its. Options which could be considered are: • Separate vertical and horizontal developments • Separate Multifamily and mixed use • Separate Mixed Use zone from Corridor Mixed Use • Increase the distance from a public park or trail • Increase the unit threshold • Increase the amount of open space required per unit • Increase the amount of units required before the open space is required • Leave the requirements as they are currently written • Eliminate the requirements completely Commissioner Phillips confirmed the latest update to the development regulations there are no setback requirements in the mixed use zones. Commissioner Johnson confirmed Spokane does not have any open space requirements in a mixed use zone. Spokane County does not have a requirement but offers incentives if they are added to a mixed use development. Commissioner Johnson pointed out that about 90% of the areas being discussed would be except, but the rest of the areas he would not want to have some kind of open space requirements. Most of the areas are close to transit, places we want there to be vertical growth, and people who live in these places have a different lifestyle.He said he didn't think there should be a requirement in those cases. Commissioner Phillips' concern has been someone trying to build a multifamily project in the MU or CMU zone so they could get out of the open space requirement. After listening to some of the conversations, he thinks maybe this requirement would not be necessary in these zones and would make us more equal with the County and Spokane. Commissioner Walton feels that a dedicated multifamily development in these zones should have different requirements than a mixed use development. There was considerable discussion about why the City does not have mixed use development.Ms. Barlow shared a consultant for the City, at the time of the Comprehensive Plan 2018-04-26 Planning Commission Minutes Page S of 5 Update,said there is not enough density in the City to drive it right now. Discussion of how much commercial there should be required in order to consider the project as mixed use. Commissioner Rasmussen said she did not want to stand in the way of any mixed-use project which would want to build here, Commissioner Kelley said he supports no open space for a vertical environment,but for multifamily,open space should be required, At the end of the discussion the consensus was to have staff separate the mixed use development from the multifamily, to define what would be a mixed-use development, look at whether or not the 1,300 foot requirement from a park or trail would still need to be included and remove the language regarding the"fee in lieu' altogether. VIII. GOOD OF THE ORDER: Commissioner Walton discussed when a motion is actually made, especially when the subject has had a bit of discussion back and forth and everyone might not be in agreement with the solution,there should be some extra discussion on the merits of the motion itself before taking a vote. IX. ADJOURNMENT: Commissioner Johnson moved to adjourn the meeting at 8:36 p.m. The vote on the motion was unanimons in favor, the notion passed. 411,6 1111,111.ffai IPPY ) Miche le Rasmussen,Chair Date signed LLith76,0 Deanna Horton,Secretary APPROVED Minutes Spokane Valley Planning Commission Council Chambers--City Hall May 10,2018 I. Chair Rasmussen called the meeting to order at 6:01 p.m. Commissioners,staff and audience stood for the pledge of allegiance. Secretary Deanna Horton took roll and the following members and staff were present: James Johnson Cary Driskell,City Attorney Danielle Kaschmitter Lori Barlow,Senior Planner Tim Kelley Jenny Nickerson,Assistant Building Official Mike Phillips Marty Palaniuk, Planner Michelle Rasmussen Micki Harnois,Planner Suzanne Stathos,arrived at 6:04 p.m. Karen Kendall,Planner Matt Walton Deanna Horton,Secretary for the Commission Hearing no objections the Commission excused Commissioner Stathos II. AGENDA: Commissioner Johnson moved to accept the May 10,2018 agenda as presented. The vole on the motion was six in,favor,zero against and the motion passed. III. MINUTES:There were no minutes to approve. IV. COMMISSION REPORTS:The Commissioners had no reports. V. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT: Senior Planner Lori Barlow informed the Commission the city of Millwood is holding a Planning Short Course May 23,2018 and suggested anyone who had not attended one previously should consider attending. This Short Course is produced by the Washington State Department of Commerce and provides good information. VI. PUBLIC COMMENT:There was no public comment. VII. COMMISSION BUSINESS: i. Planning Commission Findings of Fact for CTA-2018-0002, a privately initiated code text amendment to the Spokane Valley Municipal Code 19.60 and 19.65 to allow lodging in the Industrial zone. Planner Marty Palaniuk presented the Planning Commission's Findings of Fact for CTA-2018- 0002, a privately initiated code text amendment to Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) to allow hotels/motels in the Industrial zone. Mr.Palaniuk explained the Findings reflect the Planning Commission's recommendation to the City Council: to allow hotels/motels with a building footprint of 25,000 square feet or less in the Industrial zone, a building footprint of more than 25,000 square feet, would need a Conditional Use Permit (CUP). Also adopted were minor language changes recommended by staff, to bring the original amendment language in line with the way the rest of the SVMC code is written. Commissioner Johnson clarified the 25,000 square foot footprint only referred to the building size on the ground and did not dictate the overall size the building could be. Commissioner Kelley moved to accept the Findings for CTA-2018-0002 as presented Commissioner Walton stated he was still strongly opposed to the language allowing a structure with a building footprint larger than 25,000 square feet. He said the applicant was not seeking anything larger and it would be a mistake to allow larger structures to take up more Industrial zoned land. Commissioner Kelley confirmed Mr. Walton is comfortable with a structure which has a 25,000 square feet or smaller footprint. Commissioner Walton noted he had moved to adopt language which excluded a larger structure but that motion had died for Iack of a second. Commissioner Kelley renewed his support of the hotels/motels for what they can bring into the City by means of tax base,employment,other services,retail sales,business sales. Commissioner Johnson agreed the amendment was a good idea but feels the CUP process was extra regulation which was unnecessary,and felt this part of the amendment needed further discussion and should 2018-05-10 Planning Commission Minutes Page 2 of 5 have been removed from the proposal. He also felt that the location of the project should be closer to the arterial, and that not adding language to the amendment to require it lacked proper prudence. The motion passed, by a show of hands, with fano,.in favor and three against, with Commissioners Johnson, Stathos and Walton dissenting. ii. Deliberations: 2018 Comprehensive Plan Amendments CPA-2018-0001 Planner Micki Harnois reminded the Commission that CPA-2018-0001 is located approximately 300 east of Pines on Valleyway. The request is to change the Comprehensive Plan designation from Single Family Residential (SFR) to Multifamily Residential (MFR) and from R-3 to Multifamily zoning. The property is bordered to the north and south by MFR and to the west by Corridor Mixed Use(CMU). Commissioner Johnson said he sympathized with people who did not want to have development intrude into their neighborhood but this was only a few hundred feet from the corridor and nothing stays the same forever. Commissioner Walton stated he felt it would match the rest of the surrounding areas. Commissioner Johnson moved to recommend approval of CTA-2018-0001. Commissioner Stathos asked where the line is drawn in order to stop development from encroaching into the neighborhoods. Commissioner Walton said he sympathized with Commissioner Stathos'comment and felt the Planning Commission exists to determine where change was appropriate, and he felt this change was appropriate in this area. The motion passed with a vote of six in favor, one against with Commissioner Stathos dissenting. CPA-2018-0003 Mr. Palaniuk reminded the Commission that CPA-2018-0003 was located on Bowdish Road just north of the intersection with Sands Road. The request is to change the designation from SFR to CMU and the zoning from R-2 to CMU. Mr. Palaniuk said this parcel is located in a floodplain, has alluvium soils,has a fish-bearing stream running through it and is south of the railroad tracks. The contiguous parcels which meet the criteria to make the request for the change are across the railroad right-of-way to the north,which is designated CMU. Commissioner Kelley discussed many of the objections which had been raised during the public hearing, schools would be over crowded, the traffic would increase, property values would decrease,there was not enough notice given and crime would increase. He noted that these issues are often brought up when a multifamily project is proposed. He commented that rarely do any of these things actually happen. He noted Ms. Barlow said there was plenty of notice given. Commissioner Walton said the request was to change from SFR to CMU has more uses than just multifamily which need to be considered when before allowing the change. Commissioner Johnson said when he visited the site in February and the homes in the front of the site are an extension of the surrounding neighborhood. He felt the transition between those homes and Dishman-Mica needed to be preserved,and this is not the right change for this area. Commissioner Phillips said he does not feel the CMU should reach across the railroad tracks to the south into the residential neighborhoods. Commissioner Stathos said she was concerned about the floodplain on the property and comments the citizens had made. Commissioner Kaschmitter said she had concerns regarding the floodplain,fire evacuations,soil contamination and the outpouring of people who were against the change. Commissioner Walton said he noted all of the citizen comments,but in the staff report it noted that the request was not consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The allowable uses for the CMU designation were not appropriate for the area and the requested change was not consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Commissioner Rasmussen said she was concerned about neighbors who live next to the request stating they have had water in their backyards and not allowing the CMU to encroach past the logical division of the railroad tracks. Commissioner Johnson moved to recommend denial of CPA-2018-0003 to the City Council The motion passed with a vote of six in favor and one against with Commissioner Kelley dissenting. 2018-05-10 Planning Commission Minutes Page 3 of 5 CPA-2018-0004 Mr. Palaniuk said CPA-2018-0004 was located at the corner of 7s' Avenue and University Road. The request is to change the designation from SFR to Neighborhood Commercial (NC) and the zoning from R-3 to NC. The applicant owns an adjacent parcel which was designated NC during the 2016 Comprehensive Plan Update. During the public hearing, several citizens had commented that language on the subdivision plat could prohibit commercial development on any property located within the subdivision without a vote of the subdivision members. The Commissioners asked City Attorney Cary Driskell to opine on how this covenant would affect the property change. Mr. Driskell stated that covenants are a civil matter between parties and does not affect any decision that the Commission would make. The City has the legal right to rezone the property. The covenants could affect development in the future;however,a single-family residence is still an allowed use on the property. Commissioner Johnson said he understood the comments regarding increased in traffic in the neighborhood as was suggested by many who testified, but there was also a need for more NC in many areas. He also contained a Counci membet had requested that staff add more areas of NC in the City during the Comprehensive Plan update. Commissioner Walton said he understood the objections but since both parcels were owned by the same person, lie felt it placed the property owner at a disadvantage when the parcels were zoned differently. Commissioner Kelley said the Commission had discussions during the Comprehensive Plan Update about having more services. in the neighborhoods. The two parcels are right on University Road and fit all the criteria discussed for the NC during the Update. Commissioner Kasehinitter agreed. Commissioner Johnson moved to recommend approval of CPA-2018-0004 to the City Council. The motion passed with a vote of seven in favor, and zero against. CPA-2018-0005 Commissioner Phillips recused himselffrom this amendment and left the room. Planner Karen Kendall reminded the Commission this amendment was correcting a mapping error where several parcels were split zoned during the Comprehensive Plan Update. The parcels are located at the apex of Progress and Forker Roads. The City is proposing to correct the zoning by having the NC zone along the north and east portion above the Bonneville Power Easement and south and west of the easement changed to SFR. The Commissioners had no concerns regarding this amendment. Commissioner Johnson moved to recommend approval of CTA-2018-0005 to the City Council. The motion passed with a vote of six in favor and zero against. CPA-2018-0006 Commissioner Phillips returned to the room. Ms.Kendall explained the parcel for this amendment is located on Trent Road just east of Sullivan, and the easterly 15 feet of the parcel is designated as SFR and the remainder of the parcel is designated Industrial Mixed Use (IMU). The proposal is to designate the entire parcel as IMU. The Commissioners had no concerns regarding this correction. Commissioner Johnson moved to recommend approval of CTA-2018-0006 to the City Council. The motion passed with a vote of seven in favor and zero against, iii. Discussion to Rescind CTA-2018-0002 Commissioner Walton moved to rescind the motion regarding CTA-2018-0002 due to a procedural error. Commissioner Walton stated he felt the topic needed more discussion,especially since the vote to approve the findings was four to three. He also felt there had been an error in parliamentary procedure during the April 26,2018 meeting while recommending approval of the amendment, a privately initiated code text amendment to allow hotels/motels in the Industrial zone. The vote on the motion to recommend approval of the amendment as submitted with minor changes passed with 2018-05-10 Planning Commission Minutes Page 4 of 5 a vote of five in favor,two against. Although the Commissioners had discussed the merits of the amendment under small board rules, when the adopted motion was put to the floor, there was no discussion on the merits of the main motion itself before the Commission voted on it, which Commissioner Walton felt was in error. There was discussion as to whether the motion to rescind was the proper main motion and the Commission took a break for staff to research the topic. After review of Roberts Rules of Order, it was determined the motion to rescind was in order, however it would have been more timely had it been made prior to the Findings of Fact supporting the Planning Commission's decision on CTA-2018-0002. If the motion to rescind passes, then there will need to be extra work to reconsider the Findings since they currently support CTA-2018- 0002 as it passed. Commissioner Walton stated he felt the Commission moved too quickly to take the vote on the adopted motion and Commissioners should have been given an opportunity to discuss the merits of the main motion on the floor. He feels that were several strong viewpoints that could have changed minds,there could have been amendments to the motion had the opportunity been there. However in moving to vote right after the motion was made,did not allow for the proper discussion of the merits of the motion itself. Commissioner Kelley said there is a proper procedure but many times based on small board rules all the elements are there,but not necessarily in the correct order. While he agrees there should be discussion every time, it does not always happen with this group and up until now,no one has had an issue with this process. He believes the topic was thoroughly discussed before it was voted on. Commissioners Stathos and Kaschmitter had no comment. Commissioner Johnson said he remembered Commissioner Kelley making a motion without the 25,000 square foot requirement with the CUP requirement but the motion was not very clear to him. After some conversation, Mr. Kelley made a motion to accept the amendment as it was written. Commissioner Johnson said it seemed the motion was unclear,and then all of the sudden there was a vote on it. Commissioner Kelley said his only confusion was when Ms. Barlow interjected that he adopted staff's proposed language changes, otherwise he said he was aware of what his motion was. Commissioner Walton added he understands that while at times the Commission does follow small board rules,it does not relinquish its right to follow the proper procedures when adopting a motion for Commission business. He also said to Commissioner Johnson's point,he was confused about what the actual motion before he was asked to vote on it, Commissioner Phillips stated he seconded the motion made by Commissioner Kelley and he understood the motion,whether it was understood by anyone else,five people voted in favor of it. Someone understood it enough to vote on it, Commissioner Walton said he was going to make one more plea that there is order and procedure for a reason. If they are not followed,there has to be a remedy for it, especially if there was an opportunity to seek clarification or to add additional clarification. He appreciates the extensive discussion prior to the motion being made, but after the motion is made there needs to be opportunity offer amendments and additional discussion based on the language of the motion itself before there is a vote. This did not occur during the vote of CTA-2018-0002,which violated proper procedure; he encourages the Commission to consider this when voting on the motion to rescind the motion. The motion failed with a vote of three in favor and four against with Commissioners Kaschmitter; Kelley, Phillips and Rasmussen dissenting. VII. GOOD OF THE ORDER:Thanks to staff and Commission members for discussion on parliamentary procedure. LX. ADJOURNMENT: Commissioner Johnson moved to adjourn the meeting at 7:46 p.m. The vote on the motion was unanimous in favor, the motion passed. 2018-05-10 Ptannin_ minissien Minute Page 5 of c _ S7/2,1//g�� /'wry Michelle Rasmussen,Chair Date signed /0V16/q-61.0 Deanna Horton, Secretary — COMMUNITY AND PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING&PLANNING Spokane 4.00.1;Valley STAFF REPORT PORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION CTA-2018-0002 STAFF REPORT DATE: April 18,2018 HEARING DATE AND LOCATION: April 26, 2018, beginning at 6:00 p.m., Spokane Valley City Hall Council Chambers, 10210 East Sprague Avenue,Spokane Valley,Washington 99206. PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: A privately-initiated text amendment to SVMC 19.60.050 and SVMC 19.65.080 to allow a hotel/motel in the Industrial zone subject to a conditional use permit(CUP)only if the building footprint exceeds 25,000 square feet. APPROVAL CRITERIA: Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan,SVMC 17.80,150, 19.30.040. SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS: Staff concludes that the proposed amendments to SVMC 19.60.050 and SVMC 19.65.080 are consistent with minimum criteria for review and approval, and with the Comprehensive Plan. STAFF CONTACT:Martin Palaniuk,Planner and Lori Barlow,AICP,Senior Planner ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit 1: CTA-2018-0002 Application,attachment and proposed amendments to chapter 19.60.050 SVMC,and chapter 19.65.080 SVMC, Exhibit 2: Staff revised proposed amendments Exhibit 3: Presentation BACKGROUND INFORMATION 1. APPLICATION PROCESSING: SVMC Chapter 17.80, Permit Processing Procedures. The following table summarizes the procedural steps for the proposal. Process Date Application Submitted February 21,2018 Determination of Completeness February 26,2018 SEPA—DNS Issued March 23,2018 Published Notice of Public Hearing: April 6,2018 Department of Commerce 60-day Notice of Intent to April 18,2018 Adopt Amendment PROPOSAL BACKGROUND: The proposal is to allow hotels and motels on sites with frontage on a principal arterial in the Industrial zone. if the building footprint is greater than 25,000 square feet,the use would be subject to a conditional use permit. The proposal modifies the SVMC 19.60.050 Permitted Uses Matrix and SVMC 19.65.080 Lodging-Supplemental Use Regulations. The intent is to allow hotels/motels in the Industrial zone, but keep the hotel/motel location on the perimeter of the industrial areas to minimize conflict with industrial related activities,such as truck traffic and hazardous operations. The Applicant has Staff Report and Recommendation CTA-2018-0002 noted its view that hotels are needed in the Industrial zone to provide proximal lodging for commuting workers — an evolving trend where workers commute to the job, but maintain permanent residence elsewhere. Analysis: Currently hotels and motels are allowed in four zones, (see Table 1 below) without supplemental regulations. The proposed amendment would permit hotels and motels in the Industrial zone only if the site has frontage on a principal arterial. This limits potential sites to Industrial zoned properties adjacent to North Sullivan Road (in the NE corporate limits) and a limited area along Broadway Avenue (in the westerly corporate limits)that lies outside of the Airport Hazard Overlay Zone(AHOZ). Pursuant to SVMC 19.110.030(I)(E)(l)(f),high intensity uses are prohibited. Table 1—Current Zoning Allowances for Hotels and Motels Parks and Open Residential Mixed Use Commercial Industrial Space R-1 R-2 R-3 MFR MU CMU NC RC IMU I POS Hotel/motel P P P P The development regulations pertaining to a hotel/motel use in the zones that currently allow hotels and motels were compared to the Industrial zone. The only difference in the regulations was that uses located in the Industrial zone are exempt from landscaping requirements for the site and parking areas(See Table 2). In the absence of setbacks, height requirements, etc, in the Zoning Code,the International Building Code(IBC)and the International Fire Code(IFC)will determine any setbacks,height etc.,It was noted that transitional regulations are called out where properties of more intensive zoning abut less intensively zoned properties. However,a review of the areas affected by the proposal notes that these circumstances do not exist and therefore transitional regulations would not be triggered. Table 2 Zoning Regulations Comparison Regulations Zones MU/CIYIU/RC/IMU I Setbacks N/A N/A Lot size N/A N/A Lot coverage N/A N/A Density N/A N/A Height N/A N/A Landscaping Required for site and parking areas Uses in the Industrial Zone are and renting pursuant to chapter 22.70 SVMC exempt from the landscaping Fencing, Landscaping and requirement for the site and parking Screening areas; fence regulations are the same Signage Required to same standard--based on"Nonresidential Zones" Parking Required to same standard-based on"Use" The lands capacity analysis presented in the September 2015 Existing Conditions Housing and Economic Trends Report prepared for the Comprehensive Plan update identified that the City had at that time 1250 net buildable acres of commercial and industrial lands,with the majority of the lands located in the industrial Page 2 of 5 Staff Report and Recommendation CTA-2018-0002 zones. The analysis concluded that the city had sufficient capacity for commercial,industrial and residential development for the twenty year planning horizon. Exhibit 3.Buildable Commercial and Industrial Land Net The intent of the Industrial zone(I) is to provide Net Underutilized Net Buildable lands for industrial development(manufacturing, Zone Vacant Acres Acres Acres Share 1-2 379 208 587 46.9% i processing, fabrications, assembly, disassembly, 1-1 201 65 266 2L3% I and freight-handling) - uses that could have MUC 105 a 109 8.7% ' significant noise,odor,or aesthetic impacts. Non- RC 44 52 96 7.7% industrial uses should be limited to preserve CMC 27 29 57 4,5']Gviability ancillary 57 4.77E 28 29 i industrial land but illal uses should C 0 25 7 32 2.5% ' be permitted to serve the industrial uses. GO 9 5 14 1.2c NC 3 2 5 O.4'1, ' The proposed CTA-2018-0002 also includes Total 831 419 1,250 100.0% amended language that provides that if the proposed hotel/motel has a building footprint greater than 25,000 square feet,a conditional use permit is required. The proposed language would allow a development with as many floors and rooms as the site could support without a conditional use permit (CUP)because the total square footage is not linked to a CUP. This language suggests that a three—story,75,000 square foot hotel or motel with a 25,000 square foot footprint could be constructed without a CUP,but a smaller 2 story hotel with a total area of 55,000 square feet and a footprint of 27,500 square feet could require a CUP However maintaining a footprint of 25,000 square feet or less leads to a more intense use of the land with vertical construction and results in preserving lands for industrial uses. For comparison to understand the scale of such a structure the new city hall building has a total area of —43,000 square feet and three floors;a current building permit for a hotel includes a total area of—29,000 square feet and will include over 200 rooms, If the CUP process is linked to a footprint rather than the total square footage,a CUP may never be required by virtue of design driving vertical development. Impacts from a hotel or motel use would generally be addressed by the City's development regulations or other agencies with jurisdiction,i.e.fire,water,sewer. The SVMC would address site development impacts such as drainage, access, parking, signage, etc., Traffic impacts are typically addressed through the concurrency requirement and mitigated through the SEPA review process. Large trip generators are typically required to provide a traffic study. Discussions with the Assistant Building Official note the following: • The Building and Fire Codes(adopted by reference pursuant to Title 24 SVMC)generally dictate property line setbacks and other protective measures where hazardous or dangerous uses occupy buildings/sites. The Building and Fire Codes dictate property line setbacks due to the fact that the development under consideration generally has no control over the existing or future development of an adjacent site. • If a large industrial parcel is developed with a hotel and the developer wishes to utilize the remainder of the site for a hazardous industrial use,there could be restrictions which would dictate no-build areas or fire lanes to provide the protection normally afforded by the property line setback requirements. A review of the regulations in place notes that all anticipated impacts from this use,including location and proximity to other uses,would be addressed by existing regulations. Page 3 of 5 Staff Report and Recommendation CTA-2018-0002 The Applicant has noted that the market requires lodging uses to be proximal to the work place to provide convenient alternatives for workers who may commute during the week and maintain a permanent residence elsewhere,or lodging for the increased number of persons involved in routine visits that involve short term stays and desire to be close to the site. Currently lodging is allowed in the four zones discussed above. The analysis discussed in this report did not consider whether allowing lodging in the Industrial zone would result in a significant shift of lodging uses to the industrial areas from the corridors based on land values, nor consider the impacts to the industrial land capacity by allowing additional non-industrial uses. The location of the land along arterials in the Industrial zone suggests a limited customer base with a direct correlation to the viability of the site for hotels and motels. Requiring that lodging sites have principal arterial frontage minimizes the opportunity for development and leads to a conclusion that the impact to available industrial lands would be marginal. A. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO THE MUNICIPAL CODE TEXT AMENDMENT 1. Compliance with Title 17(General Provisions)of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code a. Findings: SVMC 17.80.150(F)Municipal Code Text Amendment Approval Criteria i. The City may approve Municipal Code Text amendment,if it finds that (1) The proposed text amendment is consistent with the applicable provisions of the Comprehensive Plan; Staff Analysis: The proposed amendment is supported by the Comprehensive Plan and is consistent with the following goals and policies: Goal ED-GI: Support economic opportunities and employment growth for Spokane Valley. Goal ED-04: Collaborate with relevant economic development stakeholders, including the business community,to grow a strong and healthy regional economy; Goal ED-G5: Support and encourage the development of a strong workforce that is globally competitive and responds to the changing needs of the workplace. Goal ED-G6: Maintain a positive business climate that strives for flexibility, predictability and stability. Goal LU-G3: Support the transformation of commercial, industrial, and mixed—use areas into accessible districts that attract economic activity; Goal LU-G4: Ensure that land use plans, regulations, review processes, and infrastructure improvements support economic growth and vitality. Goal LU-P12:Maintain a robust supply of productive industrial land. (2) The proposed amendment bears a substantial relation to public health,safety, welfare,and protection of the environment; Staff Analysis: The amendment bears substantial relation to public health,safety, welfare and protection of the environment. The amendment allows hotel and motel uses to locate proximal to concentrated work environments in specific areas that limit conflict with industrial uses,and maintain adequate opportunities for industrial development within the industrial zone. Further,anticipated impacts of the use would be addressed by existing regulations. Page 4 of 5 Staff Report and Recommendation CTA-2018-0002 b. Conclusion(s): The proposed text amendment is consistent with the approval criteria contained in the SVMC. 2. Finding and Conclusions Specific to Public Comments a. Findings: No public comments have been received to date. b. Conclusion(s): In the absence of public comments,staff makes no conclusions. 3. Finding and Conclusions Specific to Agency Comments a. Findings: No substantive agency comments have been received to date. b. Conclusion(s): In the absence of substantive agency comments,staff makes no conclusions. B. OVERALL CONCLUSION The proposed code text amendment is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan policies and goals. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff makes no recommendation on the privately initiated code text amendment. However, if the Planning Commission recommends approval of the code text amendment, staff has revised the proposed code text amendment to be consistent with the terminology and format of the SVMC with no substantive changes to content(see attached). Page 5 of 5 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: June 5, 2018 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ® new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Motion Consideration: Better Utilizing Investments to Leverage Development (BUILD) GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 35.77.010: Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Adoption of 2018-2023 Six-Year Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP), Resolution No. 17-011, May 23, 2017; Administrative Report on BUILD Grant Opportunity, May 22, 2018. BACKGROUND: The US Department of Transportation (USDOT) issued a call for projects on April 20, 2018 for the BUILD discretionary grant program and applications are due July 19, 2018. BUILD replaces the Transportation Investment Generating Economic Recovery (TIGER) Discretionary Grant Program. The BUILD program has a total of $1.5 billion available for transportation infrastructure improvement projects like the City's Pines Road/BNSF Grade Separation Project (GSP). Minimum and maximum award amounts are $5 million and $25 million, respectively. No state is permitted to receive over$150 million of awarded funds. BUILD requires a 20% non-federal match for any awarded project. On May 24, 2018, staff attended a webinar detailing the BUILD program requirements identified in the notice of funding opportunity (NOFO). The NOFO states that at least 30% of funds must be awarded to rural projects, but USDOT expects to award at least 65% of available funds to Rural Areas. This proportion is similar to what was awarded in the 2017 TIGER IX program. This makes the City eligible for approximately $500 million available to Urban Area projects. The NOFO also states that projects must obligate all BUILD funds "sufficiently in advance of" the September 30, 2020 deadline, and USDOT will prioritize projects that have obligation dates with earlier timelines. Projects that plan to obligate near the September 2020 deadline will be considered higher risk. Given this additional insight into USDOT's interpretation of the BUILD program's NOFO, staff recognizes that this project's already narrow chance of success is further reduced when considering project readiness and limited non-federal funding availability. In order to be successful with a 2018 BUILD award, everything in the project must progress perfectly. In addition, staff is aware of several competing high profile regional projects that will likely draw local support from the Pines GSP given the City's recent success on obtaining the TIGER grant for the Barker GSP. Despite its challenges, staff sees this as an opportunity to continue moving forward with one of the City's highest priority long term goals. OPTIONS: 1) Authorize the City Manager or designee to apply for BUILD Grant funds for the Pines/BNSF Grade Separation Project; or 2) delay the application for the Pines GSP for subsequent BUILD calls for projects; or 3) take other appropriate action RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to authorize the City Manager or designee to apply for BUILD funds for all phases of the Pines Road/BNSF GSP. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: The BUILD program can award up to 80% of the total project cost, or$23.2 million of BUILD funds for a $29 million total cost. A 20% non-federal match of$5.8 million would be required. Currently, the project has approximately$1.74 million of available local funds. This results in a non-federal funding gap of approximately $4 million. STAFF CONTACT: Adam Jackson, PE — Planning & Grants Engineer Mike Basinger, AICP — Economic Development Manager ATTACHMENTS: PowerPoint Potential Grant Opportunity Better Utilizing Investments to Leverage Development (BUILD) .� OFTRgNSAI 'ii: .„,, ,_ �Osr S CiFP�� A TES IO June 5, 2018 SkaneAdam Jackson, P.E., Planning & Grants Engineer Valley° Economic Development Division What is BUILD? US Department of Transportation (USDOT) BUILD Program Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2018 Replaces Transportation Investment Generating Economic Recovery (TIGER) grant program. The two programs remain very similar. The 2017 TIGER IX application process included a draft application for the Pines/BNSF grade separation project that is a basis for the BUILD application. BUILD funding can support roads, bridges, transit, rail, ports or intermodal transportation. Projects evaluated on safety, economic competitiveness, quality of life, environmental protection, state of good repair, innovation, partnership, and additional non-Federal revenue for future transportation projects. 2 2018 BUILD Funding Total program funds $1.5 Billion Local Agency Federal Ald Fi r="ntr7s!Mos so cr..r co Project Prospectus At least 30% of awards to Rural Areas ($450 Mil) ,...6 Hr", ,.,..., Aw, m 4., USDOT expects to award at least 65% to Rural Areas zt-r,z r odoctV,311DICTON HMO,MOBILITY S r vo LGIC INVESTMENT BOARL, om.L.0,/w vv.,R.,201•ro.ro9c5..r...,LLL.14.5,-I.,SU Pro,e,,mul,,w ,m !:Z Se AN\ Min Award $5 Million Th Wi Or:g:irern=... .v.,,, sp L'r DM 1,1,2 Max Award $25 Million ,pc,,te VallYi,,,,,Ly 0,1u6-5, Barker 12ordlil,F Cm aft h.pAratmn WY,.'flilioufil Highway 1,210r P.m,. , (80% of Project Cost) 12tAr MI r frjc.* • State Award Limit $150 Million ,77 ___ .or.r.m.o.5.,,fcae,,,Lem,321s,Ne Milow,arc regulyrd t.22,2 SI • F,2,22L,r2,1121,mcnr reJ b,lot,L2221Vin2 n.22•Rrm Toc,,gr,ILL, p,r Irdcia•,.qr ard m.,..t dip*for Mrsernmu • I,,c,rr 1 o the I ir2.11,02=22 Vr2F rx2c for dchilD1 1 rtfmmano, • Applications Due July 19, 2018 .., L, hcl 0•,2 2,,,2•dr,.,2,2. 2,,,n2r2r1,1)includ•ru Y'1,,,,,,,•ILIdrn.,,,G1 In M.tncLec,,m,ML t,,,,,IS ,,721=1,Ing,a Ommat pp,nulbut.nnz,e, V Prricelr 2,132.22 I*tun,inuw,2212tled m r 2,222ao Tr.,,,L'Ion J111,1-1,VCInC II PITILlant mr,.,m,,,,,,ar^a pro,ct.Lln.c wur I'P Lumenclm,,,appLuved Sk SDLII u,11..Heu,1Lle 1Iltcy,,to,nspor..no,Inpro..—wr eLoglat ISTLP) • Award Notice December 18, 2018 P.,L Sy,cn,Lmtd L3,r 22d 2• Mai,hinc 1,,,,er,tr.d 2222212b,22,1 2AI lo Nr resr LI o/1,4a., Spol.a.tc,II,,J,aur r-L,swonl Ix SL.,,,, L ,L,6L,Ls.L.N .crly-Lve As a innunder,I.,c212,12nrr mown,a I e,gcn,su.0 YUL,L mort5I,pro,,,,,,,,Li • Funds Obligated September 30, 2020 ...,,,,1 tmcly reuubLo,en-mt,L cl,b1c,,,,,Inu.tv • Funds Expended September 30, 2025 3 Recommended Project E £LEMENTARYSCIIIC - " Alternate 2 - Roundabout4 '" tot Pines/BNSF Grade * - ' Separation Project 4 a. _ ate, N.CXEP wait 4 *-+rte;.. $', 2�` rP "i'„� _ " • I r -;.,,,e1.-A.,,' ' :..,....4 1. R s e • Iiii areisi. ,...... , , . . ., 4 0 14 1,, _• 4,-1 ,,.., , ' ' -'. 1.-- '''' - --- ...amnia g in ........ . ...,.. . ... TRENT om_ 41111111.11 -'-..�Se. f_ t a"N a / � 1 XoprNMI "fCop 101112:1113 4111111i $a 7 .Y :t3r F�. "• • 4,4 WO ■@E, i , ii. mplir �� f k 2. ,+ '. :,AI i \,,,,,t,, ' ,,,, \\ .:.1.1.4T,,„„),;,.,,i,4., . A i q MCH ERRr ST- 4 �. IAU ii ■ e e �� li vu F II IC IN i ! OE �� t 0Alternate 1 - Signal1. ,„.ii.L.VrA ' °F II II ■ _ _ �im ,. Pines/ BNSF Grade J Separation Project ..1RERl F Y .- - -. , .. : ., .. , Estimated Total Cost: $29,000,000 S-Rn ,cam y Alternate 2 - Signal Max Federal Award 80%: $23,200,000 . . Non-Federal Match = 20%: $ 5,800,000 4, `° .¢ 0. x exsan*sr. �? ,1. Secured Local Funds 1800 000 4 Non-Federal Gap $ 4,000,000 (4 - : ; t.;: ,4ELEMENM Ri ?..t, :: i �•} ^ Parallel Federal Funding Requests: k� 1, t CRISI Funding Request (PE): $ 1,250,000 _ �`"" - J� - : ,�. SRTC Funding Request (RW): 3,795,000 ALC,:., : - ,_.--,;_-:;, - , _:.,,•, -,5‘,--1;• ' City Match to PE + RW: 1,655,000 , N-SHERRY 6T - . Subtotal $ 6,700,000 �- ` . � A`` � " �� Alternate 1 - Roundabout .r QUESTIONS? OF IRAN Noi ol zZ 0, STATES OF P 6 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: June 5, 2018 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ® new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Motion Consideration: New Splash-Down Concessions, Inc. Lease agreement. GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 35A.11.020; chapter 3.49 SVMC. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Splash-Down Concessions, Inc. previously leased a portion of Valley Mission Park since 1983 for the purposes of operating a water slide and concession business. The City granted a new 10-year lease in 2009, which was set to expire April 30, 2019. Administrative report May 29, 2018 regarding proposed new lease. BACKGROUND: Upon incorporation, the City became the owner of Valley Mission Park, and also became the lessor to Splash-Down. The owner in 2003 was a small, closely-held corporation, and the City's primary contact was shareholder Bill Bleasner. The Bleasner group sold the corporation to Geoff and Melissa Kellogg in 2005, who operated Splash-Down through 2017. The City recently terminated the lease agreement with Splash-Down. The Bleasner group again owns the corporation which owns Splash-Down, and is renaming the corporation "New Splash-Down Concessions, Inc." There is currently no lease agreement to operate Splash-Down, and the new owners have been negotiating with City staff on terms of a replacement lease in time to open the weekend of June 8, 2018. In the administrative report on May 29, Council gave direction to staff on several key points. First, the proposed term of 31 months should be extended to five years. Staff is now suggesting that we extend that to December 31, 2023 (67 months instead of 60) so it would terminate at the end of the calendar year, rather than immediately prior to a new operating season. A second five year term is provided for at the mutual option of the parties. The annual lease payment will be $15,000 plus applicable leasehold excise taxes. Staff would be happy to answer any questions you may have. We will meet immediately with Mr. Montgomery, attorney for Splash-Down, to get the lease executed as soon as possible. OPTIONS: Move to authorize the City Manager to finalize and execute the Lease Agreement as drafted or amended; or take other action as appropriate. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: I move we authorize the City Manager to finalize and execute the Lease Agreement with New Splash-Down Concessions, Inc. for use of a portion of Valley Mission Park, and any related documents to accomplish the same. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Generate $15,000 annually, which is $10,000 less than in 2017. STAFF CONTACT: Cary Driskell, City Attorney, Mike Stone Parks and Recreation Director. ATTACHMENTS: Proposed lease agreement. DRAFT LEASE AGREEMENT—NEW SPLASH-DOWN CONCESSIONS,INC. This Agreement is between the City of Spokane Valley, a municipality of the State of Washington, with an address of 10210 East Sprague Avenue, Spokane Valley, Washington, 99206, hereinafter referred to as the "City," and New Splash-Down Concessions, Inc. having offices with an address of 2206 North Pines, Spokane Valley, Washington, 99206, hereinafter referred to as "Splashdown,"jointly,hereinafter referred to along with the City as the "Parties." WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, pursuant to RCW 35A.11.020, a city may lease real property, buildings, or facilities in the rendering of recreational services; and WHEREAS, the City is the owner of Valley Mission Park, located at 11123 East Mission, Spokane Valley,Washington; and WHEREAS, the City (and Spokane County prior to that) previously leased a portion of Valley Mission Park to Splashdown for the purpose of operating a water slide facility for use by the public; and WHEREAS, the City issued a notice of termination of the prior Lease Agreement (Agreement) to the prior owners of Splashdown on May 8, 2018 for material breach of the Agreement principally relating to non-payment of the lease amounts; and WHEREAS, the new owners of Splashdown is a group of investors led by William and Ruth Bleasner and the registered agent is John Montgomery, 2206 North Pines, Spokane Valley; and WHEREAS, Splashdown, under its new ownership, desires to enter into a new lease agreement with the City under the same terms that have been historically agreed to; and WHEREAS, the City desires to have Splashdown continue to provide recreational amenities to the residents of the City and has no other current use for the property at issue. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises set forth herein, the Parties mutually agree as follows: Section 1. Subject and Purpose. - The City leases to Splashdown, subject to the terms and conditions herein contained, certain real property in Valley Mission Park located at 11123 East Mission, Spokane Valley,Washington, and more particularly described as follows: That portion of Blocks 72, 75, 76 lying South of State Highway and Blocks 78, 79, 81 and 82 all in Pinecroft First Addition according to plat hereof recorded in Book "M" of Plats, Page 35, Spokane County, Washington. Together with that portion of vacated Johnson Street adjoining said Blocks. Except the West 110 feet of said Blocks 72, 75, 78 and 81; also, except the East 346.7 feet of said Blocks 76, 79 and 82; also except that portion of said Block 82 and vacated Johnson Street included within the existing tennis courts. Containing 2.56 acres more or less. Water Slide Agreement—New Splash-Down Concessions,Inc. Page 1 of 9 DRAFT This property shall hereinafter be referred to as the "Premises" for the purpose of constructing and operating only a water slide or slides and related landscaping uses. Splashdown is further permitted to sell food, soft drinks, active wear, and souvenirs on the Premises consistent with operation of the water slide. Splashdown and its clients are permitted to use the paved parking lots immediately adjacent to Mission Road (north and south) for purposes directly related to the operation and normal use of the waterpark, and subject to any applicable provisions in the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC). The City reserves the right to designate spaces for specific uses which may place limitations on use by Splashdown. Splashdown is not permitted to drive outside of the parking lot area, such as on the grass or sidewalks, without specific written permission from the Parks Director. Section 2. Term. - The initial term of this Agreement shall be for 67 months, commencing on June 1, 2018, and terminating on December 31, 2023. This Agreement may be extended for an additional five years, which would run from January 1, 2024 to December 31, 2028. The option shall be considered and determined no later than November 1,2023. Section 3. Construction of Slide Facilities. A. Splashdown, at its sole expense, shall construct and maintain upon the Premises a water slide or slides, together with appropriate fencing, support structures, landscaping, splash pool, and all related facilities and equipment. If at any time during the life of this Agreement the Splashdown fails to use the Premises for the purpose of construction and operation of a water slide or slides,without first obtaining permission in writing from the City,this Agreement may at the City's option,be terminated. B. If Splashdown desires to add additional flumes, apparatus, or other recreational items or facilities other than those constructed and in use at the time this Agreement is executed, Splashdown shall first obtain written permission for the City at least 90 days prior to the start of construction, and obtain all necessary permits related thereto. Section 4. Operation of Slide. A. Splashdown may only utilize the premises for the operation of a business providing recreational water slide services for public use during the last week of May, the months of June, July, and August, and the first week of September; provided, however, that hours of operation shall comply with any applicable SVMC provisions. B. Splashdown shall be responsible for garbage, electricity, water, natural gas, sewer, telephone service, and any other public utility of any kind furnished to the Premises during the term of this Agreement, including any extensions. Splashdown shall pay any and all other costs and expenses of every kind whatsoever in connection with the use, operation, and maintenance of the Premises and all activities conducted thereon, and the City shall have no responsibility of any kind whatsoever for any such costs. C. Any signage shall comply with currently adopted SVMC provisions. D. Splashdown shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment, or patron in violation of federal or Washington State law. Water Slide Agreement—New Splash-Down Concessions,Inc. Page 2 of 9 DRAFT Section 5. Fee. - Splashdown shall pay to the City for the initial and renewal terms of this Agreement an annual lease payment of$15,000, plus applicable leasehold excise tax (the annual payment). The annual payment may, at Splashdown's option, be paid in one lump sum payment or, alternatively, in three equal payments. If the annual payment for 2018 is in three equal payments, they shall be physically received by the City no later than 4:00 p.m. on August 5, September 5, and October 5. For subsequent years, if the annual payment is in equal payments, the payments shall be due by 4:00 p.m. on July 5,August 5,and September 5. Section 6. Compliance with Leasehold Excise Tax. A. This Agreement is subject to the "leasehold excise tax" pursuant to chapter 82.29A RCW, as adopted or amended, and shall promptly pay the City all leasehold excise tax amounts in addition to the fees set forth in Section 5. The rate is currently 12.84% pursuant to state law, which currently results in a tax of $642 per $5,000 payment, or $1,926 for the annual lease payment of$15,000. This amount may change in the future if chapter 82.29A RCW is amended, and it shall be Splashdown's responsibility to ensure it is paying the correct amount. B. Splashdown agrees to promptly pay when due any other taxes, rates, charges and assessments, special or otherwise and public charges of every kind and nature which may be lawfully imposed or assessed in any way on Splashdown regarding its use of the Premises. Splashdown further agrees to pay promptly when due all applicable taxes imposed on Splashdown as a result of the services provided upon the Premises. C. Splashdown shall comply with and abide by all federal, state, municipal, and other governmental statutes, ordinances, laws and regulations affecting the Premises, the construction, operation and maintenance of the water slide thereon, the improvements thereon, or any activity conducted on or in such Premises. Section 7. Termination. — In addition to all other rights and remedies, which the Parties may have herein or at law, the Parties may terminate this Agreement as follows: By Splashdown: This Agreement may be terminated by Splashdown upon 30 days written notice upon a default by the City in the performance of any terms of this Agreement required to be performed by the City, and the subsequent failure of the City to remedy such default within 30 days after the receipt from Splashdown of written notice to remedy the same; provided,however,that no notice of termination shall have any force or effect if the City shall have remedied the default prior to the expiration of the 30-day period, or if the nature of such default is such that a period in excess of 30 days is necessary in order for the City to cure the default and shall diligently continue its efforts to correct such default. In such event, the City shall have a reasonable amount of time to cure the default. By CITY: This Agreement may be terminated by the City upon 30 days' written notice to Splashdown for the following: A. The failure of Splashdown to make any payments of money as required hereunder after receiving 10 days' written notice of its failure to pay such money. Water Slide Agreement—New Splash-Down Concessions,Inc. Page 3 of 9 DRAFT B. Abandonment of the Premises by Splashdown and/or the continuance of unauthorized conduct and operation of the business required hereunder for a period of at least five consecutive days. Failure to operate the business as authorized herein would be considered abandonment. Provided, however, that the City agrees that interruptions in the operation of the water slide due to weather conditions or repairs shall not constitute an abandonment of the Premises. C. A default by Splashdown in the performance of any terms,conditions,or covenants of this Agreement, and the failure of Splashdown to remedy such default within 30 days after receipt of written notice to remedy the same. Splashdown may cure any such default to the satisfaction of the City,which shall render the notice of default moot. In such event, Splashdown shall have such time as is reasonably required to cure the default. Section 8. Removal of Improvements. A. In the event of termination of the lease under Section 8, the Parties shall have the following remedies: By Splashdown: In the event of termination by Splashdown, and except as provided herein, Splashdown shall have the right to remove all improvements from the Premises at any time within 120 days after such termination within the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. Splashdown shall restore the Premises to its original condition during the same time frame allowed for removal of the structure. By City: In the event of termination by the City or at the end of the term of this Agreement, the City shall have the right for a period of 90 days after termination to purchase the improvements from Splashdown at a price to be mutually agreed upon. In the event the City does not exercise its right to purchase the improvements, Splashdown shall remove the same within 120 days after the expiration of such period and restore the Premises to its original condition during the same time frame. B. In the event of a termination, and Splashdown does not remove the improvements placed upon the Premises by Splashdown within the time frames set forth herein,the City may at its option, (1) on the payment of$1.00 take title to said property; or (2) dismantle, remove and store such property at a location convenient to the City and charge to Splashdown a fee for dismantling,removing,transporting, and storing said property. Section 9. Waste and Nuisance Prohibited. - Splashdown shall not commit, or suffer to be committed, any waste or nuisance on the Premises. Section 10. Sewers. The Parties agree to the following allocation of costs with regard to sewer: A. Sewer Capital Facilities Rate: Splashdown shall be responsible for paying all Sewer Capital Facilities Rate charges (i.e. ERU's) allocable to Splashdown's use of the Premises. B. Splashdown shall pay all construction costs incurred to connect new service, increase service due to expansion of the water slide facilities, and to maintain sewer service. Water Slide Agreement—New Splash-Down Concessions,Inc. Page 4 of 9 DRAFT Splashdown shall, at its expense, install an additional water meter(s) to measure the flow of water entering the sewered portion of the Premises. C. Splashdown shall hook up to sewer no later than October 31, 2019, or when the City, as the owner of the property,is notified by Spokane County that hookup is required. D. Splashdown shall pay all monthly sewer charges allocable to Splashdown's use of the Premises. Section 11. Notices. A. All notices, demands, or other writings in this Agreement provided to be given or made or sent or which may be given, or made or sent by either Party hereto to the other, shall be deemed to have been fully given or made or sent when made in writing and deposited in the United States mail, certified, postage pre-paid and return receipt requested, and addressed as follows: To CITY: City of Spokane Valley,Attn: City Manager 10210 East Sprague Avenue Spokane Valley,Washington 99206 To LESSEE: New Splash-Down Concessions,Inc. 2206 North Pines Spokane Valley,Washington 99206 B. The address to which any notice, demand,or any other writing may be given or made or sent to any Party may be changed by at least 30 days' written notice. Section 12. Insurance. Splashdown shall procure and maintain, for the duration of the Agreement, insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damage to property which may arise from or in connection with the Splashdown's operation and use of the leased Premises. No Limitation. Splashdown's maintenance of insurance as required by the agreement shall not be construed to limit the liability of Splashdown to the coverage provided by such insurance, or otherwise limit the City's recourse to any remedy available at law or in equity. A. Minimum Scope of Insurance Splashdown shall obtain insurance of the types described below: 1. Commercial General Liability insurance shall be written on Insurance Services Office (ISO) occurrence form CG 00 01 and shall cover premises and contractual liability. The City shall be named as an insured on Splashdown's Commercial General Liability insurance policy using ISO Additional Insured-Managers or Lessors of Premises Form CG 20 11 or a substitute endorsement providing equivalent coverage. 2. Property insurance shall be written on an all risk basis. B. Minimum Amounts of Insurance Splashdown shall maintain the following insurance limits: Water Slide Agreement—New Splash-Down Concessions,Inc. Page 5 of 9 DRAFT 1. Commercial General Liability insurance shall be written with limits no less than$1,000,000 each occurrence, $2,000,000 general aggregate. 2. Property insurance shall be written covering the full value of Splashdown's property and improvements for their full replacement value with no coinsurance provisions. C. Other Insurance Provisions The insurance policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions for Commercial General Liability insurance: 1. Splashdown's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City. Any insurance, self-insurance, or insurance pool coverage maintained by the City shall be excess of Splashdown's insurance and shall not contribute to it. 2. Splashdown's insurance shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be cancelled by either party, except after 30 days' prior written notice by certified mail,return receipt requested,has been given to the City. D. Acceptability of Insurers Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best rating of not less than A:VII. E. Verification of Coverage Splashdown shall furnish the City with original certificates and a copy of the amendatory endorsements, including but not necessarily limited to the additional insured endorsement, evidencing the insurance requirements of Splashdown. Section 13. Indemnification and Hold Harmless. Splashdown shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any and all claims, suits, actions, or liabilities for injury or death of any person, or for loss or damage to property,which arises out of Splashdown's use of Premises,or from the conduct of Splashdown's business, or from any activity, work or thing done, permitted, or suffered by Splashdown in or about the Premises, except only such injury or damage as shall have been occasioned by the sole negligence of the City. Section 14. Attorney's Fees - If any action at law or in equity shall be brought to enforce the provisions of this lease or to enforce or interpret any of the covenants,terms,or conditions of this lease, or for the recovery of the possession of the Premises, each Party shall pay all of their own attorney's fees. Section 15. Repairs. A. Throughout the term of this Agreement, Splashdown shall at its own cost and without any expense to the City, keep and maintain the Premises in good, neat, and sanitary order. This includes all buildings and improvements of every kind which may be a part thereof including all appurtenances thereto, including sidewalks adjacent thereto. The City shall not be obligated to Water Slide Agreement—New Splash-Down Concessions,Inc. Page 6 of 9 DRAFT make any repairs,replacements, or renewals of any kind, nature, or description whatsoever to the Premises,or any buildings or improvements thereon. B. Splashdown shall control all rodents and other pests that may be on or in the Premises during the term of this Agreement. C. Splashdown shall provide trash and garbage receptacles and have refuse removed from the Premises on a regular basis. D. Splashdown shall remain in compliance with all applicable laws and regulations of the Spokane Regional Health Department. Section 16. Insolvency or Bankruptcy - If Splashdown becomes insolvent, voluntarily or involuntarily bankrupt, or if a receiver, assignee or other liquidating officer is appointed for the business of Splashdown,then the City may terminate this Agreement. Section 17. Employees - Splashdown shall conduct a background check on all employees working at the water slide or any concessions operated on the Premises. Section 18. Liens - Splashdown shall keep the Premises free and clear from all mechanics' and materialmens' and other liens from work or labor done or services performed in any way arising out of the use of the Premises by Splashdown. Section 19. Ownership of Improvements. — All improvements and equipment placed on the Premises by Splashdown shall be and remain the property of Splashdown, and the City shall have no interest therein except as provided hereinafter. Section 20. Non-Liability of City for Theft, Burglary or Vandalism - The City shall not be liable in any manner for any loss, injury, or damage incurred by Splashdown from any acts of theft, burglary, or vandalism. Splashdown shall be responsible for providing all expenditures relating to any security precaution that Splashdown deems necessary or appropriate for the safety of the personnel, guests, employees, patrons, or users of the premises, or property of Splashdown located on the Premises. Splashdown shall implement security measures sufficient to secure the Premises after hours and prevent unauthorized use. Section 21. Relationship of the Parties. A. The Parties intend that an independent contractor relationship will be created by this Agreement. The City is interested in only the results to be achieved, and the conduct and control of the services will lie solely with Splashdown. Splashdown will be solely and entirely responsible for its acts and the acts of its agents, employees, servants, sub-lessee or otherwise during the performance of this Agreement. B. No agency, employment or partnership is created by this Agreement. Splashdown's business is separate and apart from that conducted by the City. Neither Party will have authority to act for the other in any obligations or expenses whatsoever of the other Party. Section 22. Venue Stipulation -This Agreement has been made and delivered within the State of Washington, and shall be governed by the laws of the State of Washington, both as to interpretation and performance. Any action at law, suit in equity, or judicial proceeding for the Water Slide Agreement—New Splash-Down Concessions,Inc. Page 7 of 9 DRAFT enforcement of this Agreement or any provision hereof shall be instituted and maintained only in Spokane County Superior Court. Section 23. Assignment - Each Party to this Agreement binds themselves, their partners, successors, executors, administrators, and assigns to the other Party of this Agreement and to the Party's successors, executors, administrators and assigns of each other Party with respect to all terms, conditions and covenants set forth herein. Splashdown may not assign, transfer in whole or in part its interest in this Agreement without the same being first authorized by motion of the City Council. A decision by the City Council to provide consent or denial shall be communicated to Splashdown within a reasonable time frame,not to exceed 30 calendar days of written request. The City Council's decision shall be made considering, among other factors, the financial stability, experience in operating/owning water slides and related recreational facilities, and the ability to meet conditions within this Agreement. In the event of an assignment, the assignee shall assume all liability of the assignor. Any unauthorized voluntary assignment or sub-lease shall be void, and shall terminate this lease at the City's option. Section 24. Waiver-No officer, employee, or agent of the City has the power,right or authority to waive any of the conditions or provisions of this Agreement. The waiver of any breach of this Agreement shall not be held to be a waiver of any other or subsequent breach. All remedies afforded in this Agreement or at law shall be taken and construed as being in addition to every other remedy provided herein or by law. The failure of the City to enforce at any time any of the provisions of this Agreement or to require at any time performance by Splashdown of any of the provisions hereof, shall be in no way construed to be a waiver of such provisions, nor any way affect the validity of this Agreement or any part hereof or the right of the City to thereafter enforce each and every such provision. Section 25. Modification - There shall be no modification of this Agreement, except in writing, executed with the same formalities of this present instrument. Section 26. Severability. A. It is understood and agreed by the Parties that if any part, term, or provision of this Agreement is held by the Court to be illegal, the validity of the remaining portions or provisions shall not be affected, and the rights and obligations of the Parties shall be construed and enforced as if this Agreement did not contain a particular part,term,or provision held to be invalid. B. If it should appear that any part, term, or provision hereof is in conflict with any statutory provisions of Washington, then the part, term, or provision hereof which may conflict shall be deemed void insofar as it may be in conflict, and be deemed to modify the Agreement to conform to such statutory provisions. Section 27. Time of the Essence - Time is of the essence regarding each and every provision of this Agreement. Section 28. All Writing Contained Herein-This Agreement contains all the terms and conditions agreed upon by the Parties. No other understandings, oral or otherwise, regarding the subject matter of this Agreement shall be deemed to exist or to bind any of the Parties. In the event any language in an attachment which has been made part of this Agreement conflicts or appears to conflict with this document, it is expressly agreed by the Parties that this written Agreement shall control in the resolution of any such disputes. Water Slide Agreement—New Splash-Down Concessions,Inc. Page 8 of 9 DRAFT Section 29. Exhibits— A. Insurance certificates. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the PARTIES have caused this Agreement to be executed on the date and year set forth above. CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY: NEW SPLASH-DOWN CONCESSIONS,INC.: Mark Calhoun, City Manager Name Title: Tax ID No. Approved as to form: Approved as to form: Office of the City Attorney Counsel for New Splash-Down Concessions,Inc. Water Slide Agreement—New Splash-Down Concessions,Inc. Page 9 of 9 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: June 5, 2018 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ® admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Retail Recruitment Plan GOVERNING LEGISLATION: None PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: None BACKGROUND: In 2015, the City engaged the services of Community Attributes, Inc. (CAI) to develop a retail improvement strategy and action plan to enhance the City's retail offerings. In 2016, the City adopted an update to its comprehensive plan and development regulations that incorporated the strategies and actions identified in the study, such as increased flexibility for retailers, increased density along commercial corridors, and new opportunities for neighborhood commercial. In late 2017, the City engaged Retail Strategies, a retail recruiter, consistent with the implementation strategy to intensify targeted retail recruitment efforts. Retail Strategies has completed the Retail Recruitment Plan, which includes a delineation of the Spokane Valley Trade Area that includes demographic and psychographic data. The development of the plan also included in-person market research and a peer market analysis. This information was used to develop the Spokane Valley— Market Guide. This guide is used for marketing the city to retailers. Tonight, Mr. Burnett of Retail Strategies will provide an overview of the Retail Recruitment Plan and provide a summary of the feedback they received from various retail merchants and developers they met on our behalf at The Global Retail Real Estate Convention held May 20-23, 2018 in Las Vegas, Nevada. OPTIONS: Discussion RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Discussion BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: None STAFF CONTACT: Chaz Bates, Economic Development Specialist Mike Basinger, Economic Development Manager ATTACHMENTS: Spokane Valley— Market Guide Retail Strategies presentation a; k. Q., as 0 0 0 G) 0 O 4� A—) U) A--) U) •_ c6 = > N I�1 2 O U Your Research 1 1 Discover: Market Research — Research Investment $ 176, 000 mond ■ U Foas. L^_} Trade Area Identification Drive Times specific reports Radius Rings Customized Trade Area 23,555 Psychographic Profile unique variables Data Based Decision Making Tapestry Segmentation geographies 1irc Market Opportunity Analysison per variable CP Mo Peer Community Analysis 3,367 Void & Distance Tolerance P - t®kP Gap Analysis variables to analyze Mobile Data Collection GIS Mapping & Data Resources Paid Subscriptions and Reports $60,000 $111,000 $5,000 An industry leading report which utilizes cell phone Sitewise, Site to Do Business, REGIS Retail Lease Trac, Plain Vanilla Shell, Supermarket data to identify the home location of consumers that STI PopStats, ESRI, Applied Geographic Solutions, News, Sales Genie, Nation's Restaurant News, visit a defined shopping area within the trade area. Land Vision Crittenden Research, Loopnet �resgenre SN LAND V I S ION CC[M � � ube,Reta� Sitewise FPQPtaurantzvs TETRAD 'i stats STDB sitesusr RLT REGIS Crittenden Research ^""4""`T°`� °^ e Discover: Drive Time & Radius 0 Drive-Time & Radius Traditionally when retailers and developers first look at a market for the purpose of evaluating 3-Mile 5-Mile 10-Mile 5-Minute 10-Minute 15-Minute Category demographic information relevant to market Radius Radius Radius Drive Time Drive Time Drive Time potential they begin with radius rings. This approach can work for a quick simple analysis but Current Year Estimated fails to take into account the unique aspects Population Discover: Mobile Tracking Mobile Data Collection Our mobile tracking study uses data collected from mobile phone users who displayed in a color-coded distribution map that indicates the percent of visitors have agreed within their apps and phone settings to enable location information. who have travelled to the study area from each square-mile block in a map grid. By drawing a polygon around a retailer, we are able to gather data about the Once we draw a polygon around a study area, we then specify a time frame in home and work location of customers who have actively used their mobile which to measure customer location patterns. The resulting data is gathered device while in the defined area. For this study, we have used mobile GPS from shoppers who visited the defined location during the designated time tracking data to examine Spokane Valley's core consumer trade area using the period. When assessing the results of a mobile study, we must keep in mind Walmart, Lowes, Eddie Bauer and Home Goods stores located in Spokane that the number of visitors that are tracked is a very small percentage of the Valley, WA. The chosen retailers are large traffic generators that might attract overall population who have visited the study area. These data give us accurate different consumer groups drawn to different categories and levels of retail. The insights to the distribution of visitors, but not the overall quantity of visitors. results of this study are Locations Tracked: Bio Distribution Time Period Tracked: a of i to 0.25% Walmart 0.25%to 0.5% January 31, 2017 — 0.5(y.to 1% Lowe's January 31, 2018 0.7s%to lar% Eddie Bauer Home Goods • l it • Walmart Lowes Eddie Bauer Home Goods Prepared for Spokane Valley WA by Retail Strategies Discover: Custom Trade Areas Primary Trade Area C Garay Beach Each retailer has a specific formula of market criteria they use to determine if they will have a profitable store. Understanding your trade area is extremely important Buckeye 2 3D6 because it sets the parameters for measuring ( , t Gree tuff demographic criteria and spending potential sought by I; retailers and developers. Municipal boundaries, radius rings and drive times are a start to evaluating this information. However, these predefined boundaries are ne a Fails unable to take into account the unique aspects affecting r the actual consumer pulling power and local geography of your community. For these reasons a customized trade area is the next step to analyzing a market. A trade area is the geographic area from which a community generates the majority of its customers. A community can have more than one trade area. We define your primary trade area the core base of consumers highly likely to shop and eat in the market at rk4_ least once a month. Your primary trade area has been created by combining the results from the mobile tracking data with other factors such as: current retail R mix in your community, traffic patterns, destination attractions and proximity to competing markets. 299,401 rr Th.es Marshall es 2017 Estimated Population Custom Trade Area E= q-5 r n • • Duncan Manito : 313,659 4.8% -, Dynamite projected projected growth rate 2022 population 2017-2022 SettersAsti 38 40 Retail Strategies has created the customized trade area shown in the map above and outlined in RED which is male female focused on a consumer who might travel for their primary shopping destination within Spokane Valley. avg age avg age Prepared for Spokane Valley_WA by Retail Strategies 6 Discover: Total Market Supply 0 Total Market Supply ri , ,,,.. , __„„ 3 31 _.___37 i .. ,, ' ,-i / ...,7,i f_„_,, • $1 to $5MM `" ❑ $5MM to $11JMM111 ', + n 1{]MM toSMM R n $25MM to $5OMM 'n1 • $50MM to $75MM Ile Fails 4 _ , ,_ • $75MM to $1{1OMM .: _ 1 I I al 'fit 'f ;-0,----• r.: is ilkoco-pi1111 r`° tr..,,. z Total Market Supply $6,039,688, 153 1 This represents the amount rt captured by businesses located � Bellgrove in the defined trade area by block group. The areas with _ , darker green are capturing more consumer dollars. Turn'. 117:74. - vee '_ �` n Prepared for Spokane Valley WA by Retail Strategies111 Discover: Total Market Demand 0 RTota I Consumer Demand to $5MM in, 1W isatillip ❑ $5MM to $ DMM ❑ $ {]MM to $25MM © $25MM to $5{]MM .- ® $5]MM to $75MM • $75MM to $ {]JMM — ---.'T ` �- . • > $ 1JJMM !aim. '111,‘„ il ililltil ".. a+v�l—aet ,, . ®11 Total Market Demand , �= $5,531,717,699 `` i This represents the amount spent by consumers located in -___. _ the defined trade area by block - can ,y111,,. p ,tAl group. In the dark green areas ,n Batters the consumer demand is higher. a ikrr.e. 7 mi Prepared for Spokane Valley WA by Retail Strategies 8 Discover: Opportunity Gap 0 Opportunity Gap -11 - MM ❑ -$50MM to -$25MM ( . 'Pi 0 50.00-$25;000 000.00 � . IIIII • $25MM to $5]MM i .r' _.. • S50MM to S DEMM ti • > $ {]JMM ' l -- -it ': lih , Total Market Leakage t +. ' ;1_: , _ - .y _ake `-., -$507,970,454 ..: am This means more people purchase � items outside of the defined Spokane L r , _ ` . 1 Valley trade area than in the Spokane �'� Valley defined trade area for their 1 a consumer goods and services. _ ..___ Finding the specific categories where r. they are leaving the market is the key. ` L I a Prepared for Spokane Valley WA by Retail Strategies 9 Discover: Peer Analysis 0 CITY COMPARISON REPORT Target- 5 Minute Drive Time City State Residential Pop Total Daytime Median Market Supply Retail Shopping Center GLA Population Household Income 34,743 $44,618 Fresno CA 39,425 26,992 $47,690 $1,184,863,694 39,425 Chico CA 30,416 20,854 $45,916 $1,285,979,702 30,416 Yuba City CA 39,357 23,951 $44,325 $1,121,515,929 39,357 Clackamas OR 35,600 24,037 $51,399 $762,493,723 35,600 Springfield OR 32,776 17,947 $41,920 $497,494,359 32,776 Prepared for Spokane Valley WA by Retail Strategies Discover: Peer Analysis 0 CITY COMPARISON REPORT Safeway at 14020 E Sprague Ave - 10 Min Drive Time Residential Total Daytime Median ity State Median Age Market Supply Pop Population Household Income • $51,189 Keizer OR 100,195 121,263 $44,432 34.7 $2,028,051,210 Bend OR 89,493 106,810 $58,125 38.8 $2,136,254,265 Lacey WA 96,414 106,430 $61,254 38.0 $2,085,949,594 Olympia WA 89,557 116,210 $58,987 38.3 $2,329,642,661 Tacoma WA 96,191 110,618 $54,901 38.4 $2,171,789,221 Puyallup WA 92,609 97,416 $58,063 36.5 $1,464,749,114 Prepared for Spokane Valley WA by Retail Strategies Discover: Peer Analysis 0 CITY COMPARISON REPORT Walmart at 15727 E Broadway Ave 10 Min Drive Time City State Residential Total Daytime Median Market Supply Retail Shopping Center GLA Pop Population Household Income III Billings MT 78,453 52,816 $53,454 $1,955,396,106 1,430,089 Milwaukie OR 88,438 47,488 $59,494 $2,409,415,740 1,381,997 Sherwood OR 76,097 48,558 $69,636 $1,821,500,032 2,528,373 Logan UT 79,796 45,482 $45,667 $1,202,221,256 1,275,545 Prepared for Spokane Valley WA by Retail Strategies #trendingnow w _ -- -- ----.... ---- --- --. . . , . . . _ 1 • _. - t- , : • ....._.._ __ .„, - A--_ 0 , --. 1 " ....-..,.. ....;......'''''' . 1 ' 4RFORS¢,,,, ,..1001106 i iillkb EXPERIENCIAL RETAIL Retail is Growing but Changing . . . o TRAINING CLASSES BOPUS PUPHo P0 — SOPS SHOWROOMS 2017 (14,248 opens,10,168 closures) • 4,000 New Openings Segment NetttSotoorre +4,080 paw.,• t>i , . • 1,326 New "Core Retail" Stores Net `-ter , °'AL. ' '" t Core Retail is chains with>50 Stores) Supermarkets 874 Stores Opening O ,/ j N ` 2,754 New Restaurants Opening in 2017 o'u9storea 345 ,420--N-4,7,7 '"*` • 0 Superstores/WH Clubs 82 , e en I i 201 8 Department Stores •400 '♦11,'W • 5,500 New Openings Specialty Hardpoods 153 r -.) _ 1 Specialty Softpoods -3,133 El t • 3,446 New "Core Retail" Stores , "` rMaes Merchandisers 1,995 - I • Convenience Stores 1,700 1. / 2,071 New Restaurants r � ♦• Bar f Restaurants 728 Source:IHL Group, •c � 1 Fast Food 2,026 Company Reports s i.halk f.."+ I rack ` r L SIMON'STOP MALL INLINETENANTS IN 1993 s -; #of SF %of %ofTotat Coman r JJJ p y Stores 4000's► Total SF Base Rent Limited 156 1,126 2.1% 5.7% i F.W.Woolworth 206 642 12% 3.5% E Melville Corp. 135 442 0.13% 2.1% = OLE United States Shoe 109 390 0.7% 2.0% Tlt1�y=l� f Edison Brothers 110 217 0.4% 1.1% 1 FOODS. The Musieland Group 56 179 0.3% 1.1% MARKET Petrie Stores Corp. 66 346 0.6% 1.1% _ Zale Corp. 78 112 0.2% 1.0% Kmart Corp. 47 173 0.3% 1.0% Payless Shoe Stores 56 177 0-3% 0.9% ,I, it,. • \ Total 69 195/ almart 4.I Source:Stenon Property Group;Barclays Global Financial.9 Services Conference (9/14/20141 "� • TM Save money.Live better. a■nnr ...•...SIMON STOCK PERFORMANCEPERFORMANCESINCE 1993 4000% b'Xn 'Ry, AFTER 3500% --,y .i "ttAs)).': :•r. .: SFG SNL REIT Index E 3000% �rTS a 2sao% a., C moo% lell - Rne0slrnw, .�---- MIIMIIIIT O 1500%MIIMMEllEr �� - • irMIMIMIINIW. 1000% riii- __ a ' �� l sr�ilee� F -�..Il i1,.1_` il'.i� `..:.d+s 500% _ .- -- _ - monwpr O O CP O O CP O CP O O CP C Source Bloomberg I t Source: Lee Holman &Greg Buzek, IHL Group, "Debunking the Retail Apocalypse, August 2017 14 Real Estate Analysis _ti Real Estate Analysis. Current Real Estate Overview y a H on . ___©_.... AD. E. .1111.11A., , Settlement w Camp ..y. l t A • ,, !.•` !...,..,::4_11-, t . Sekanl Park 1� de nalPar E Upriver or - .r s — s �`_ .tee. l w / r fr ; Spokane Busine - :-:C ''i' .. - - - ! k tf Lll Pa ��__ i� _ - _ a &41ridu, k�' f" � ',,t;{ •i. * _ [4 1 ''.I i t �t'.1-Orf + h ` — ; • .fir.. �, ' d 1 • 14G[SN MGACEi ./ A-‹: '5''' € I• ti 'I r . E.Ir d narAve Ill„. } ' I. '7"f` i -:::: - ' - - ''''' ' II_ .+ .1 vo _ .c. 1I + r-, rte <� aaA �• ��.. .i; /.' - YY ~a .,f .�WC)1 alt• x� O1 S i.Q©. -i1- .�• -- X90•. .. SAA _.__. IW[SH AGACEi __- _.-- r is " k r 0 = City Boundary n ___ A« _ t. = Major N/S Corridor(s) 1 ` - = Secondary N/S Corridor(s) , - •--, - - = Major E/W Corridor(s) _ - = Secondary E/W Corridor(s) - • - _ _ = One Way Transit(any color) _ ` • = •Primary Sprague Ave.Intersections \ Prepared for Spokane Valley WA by Retail Strategies 004 Real Estate Analysis: Current Real Estate Overview ::1-.1.:,..,-:,/":. _:-::::, - it'l '�+}�i F: � TSLiS_n,F�Cl.. i - I` ♦ 4 Y 'i . J'e'.. r+anax f ;�:..4l�al�rl�" twit r01."'"lt * .u,tYc"DX.L sears * /___1_- ` t�. x t�.'ra P4GSUh SEPH{) A $A ' Aspiyi�nix�.iR�&}rf *PrEHOp FOREVER?) Q _dol)11'- 4 1p ES NOBLI -I ' N noaElSteR wet rc'1r1 alersun ; —- - ' - _:. r.€cilii CCi1e5fliiiiii �kf_[ IE '! I[ f- - '.-R j i ■ AERO v .:r+reua�rack OLD NAVY 1' . I . 1 { }� {j1' 4 � � , l d � �"'�5�+' 'i. N -moi` - 8 i - tea. . „JF _ i • � 'I ''. „ cricket � +� "1 'r 3"' k .. � flts'Ss._ ---".. ......<- _ _,A'� -`. f sJJ ,. - j. . N MUM THEN I. 6 7r1i); �,4 UQa•Caesara - ! v - 1� ., RITE - �� , ' 1}x1fF A - i ram., R' ' t Wa7rnart i < , ,_ ,. p as ■ - - iC' f/. I•tt} s / i,r1-� • Y P ^�^ r+cr 111 �!--r4.a .cl,� � � , Mitt 14 I , �hr # .. �”--rats ,�.� SALLY �EACY ■ ca- Y� _mr 1+ ' i ![rimmti R - 9 Lr ass v7Hs Nai lis .r,�®-�,- ..� - 1 —__ _ _ .- - W • _ L 4 . _Ig ter, y� ; s -.. I f!P V t- .. , I.f.1.1�: -- . . . .. ;.:, _ i �ti: f Fff'�C;�1 P r,mrrQhK� ljj tt1RY 7 • .-E+r r.- lrrle.[a R..� fif i _ Im , Qs 7 YEPY T vw fiTAS1at orsRw aid? rint i ' Mince _- 0.....rTQ a v , le ' 11,:,xr .4• kitDrt,erer Booh!. Le 1 T ��t 1 ' t '"°� Petco c A rt s)vw 9 d • o i - - sm�-a,ps.Glw.aerrsl.a-a..e.n �ara=w os s�o,r w7er:.nt�r..:., V Prepared for Spokane Valley WA by Retail Strategies 17 Real Estate Analysis Retail Strategies can and will support retail growth and development in all areas within the city limits of Spokane Valley. However, based on our analysis,experience,and the current retail synergy as it exists in the market today,we feel the most immediate retail real estate opportunities are the Retail Focus Properties following properties below. Therefore, our efforts will be primarily focused on these properties. EXISTING REAL ESTATE/ UNDER CONSTRUCTION .-um--s= Erind-i H ��` Idy R` - a � . E R S B ff IoWlld W� �j f 4 K _- e�1'M:1,- IH—ii;..11 -:B g � �( ima }�i�E }5 tk Valley ' 6p kalack 1 '�,,.Sp k Valley Pla •thIIIII" v EEE - tir ..:.-,=-. lin', _ .--i,_4c—e..±. ,. Xt . .y "1 Kr sPYK B 9Fnuts♦�9�-` L _ im z r,-4. �. �G as - - _ FM Evergreen Crossing Hanson &Spokane Valley Mall & Plaza Wal-Mart/TRU Power Center 13806 E Indiana Ave 14700 E Indiana Ave 15505 E. Broadway Ave. DEVELOPMENT/ HIGHER & BETTER USE k _ H —,,,, ' * ' -`1r1 :pi ••••• • . -.•••,! _ � it P J n,.ve M.i Grp •.,n T i w.• t, i a v r v I.ntary - I me o,y - -- ,,. A "' s . FnwE P :e �` I_ a 3yYr +.L _ - ,} � It J\ 41 lit 4 ; iii X41 -- rv; k t vr .,1_.1:::.1-,..c..., � , : II E Lri' `ti r i[ . , i k m rll : �t A' t '.-se n tvl I rilst(n_► � - '. I.°' r h - -.7 :_—/��Wr�'r Sprague Ave & Pines Rd "5 Points" Sprague Ave &Sullivan Rd. Applevalley Blvd & Dishman Mica Rd. Prepared for Spokane Valley WA by Retail Strategies 18 Jok Implementing your Strategy y*� VC Discover Connect Implement Contactretailersdevelopers, . , i„Aid, .. TOI m Mt representatives and ill, 14,.. i franchisee groups both •A • lop fill regionally and nationally in Make direct and indirect connections through e IIHII conference ,� % representation, in person 4 MO IIHII IMO meetings, phone calls and emails on Focus eill Coordinate and communicate our efforts with local brokers, gala' a property owners, and city 4.,„ 5 staff on an on going basis mo. - ,J� ,�L . Follow industry trends as well as changes in your • •••• • 0 local market to MI da • continuously adjust our ; strategy and improve our •• •• 14 G efforts to maximize the retail potential in your community Ji‘k Retail Recruitment: Outreach • Retail is a dynamic industry that is constantly changing... Retail decision makers may be in-house corporate real estate staff, local, regional, or national tenant representative brokers, preferred developers, consultants, etc. Retail Strategies maintains a database of nearly 10,000 unique industry contacts that is being constantly 9 703 updated as these players change. As a result, your retail recruitment ' team can easily identify the appropriate decision makers and present sites in Spokane Valley quickly in order to determine level of interest and begin work to address any potential barriers to market entry. retailers contact Retail Strategies database not only contains WHO makes the retail information & site development decisions for Spokane Valley but also WHAT each retailer se I ect I o n c r i to r i a requires from a market ( i.e. demographics, psychographics, trade area parameters) and real estate perspective ( i.e. size, co-tenancy, access, visibility). Each individual retailer has their own unique needs that must be met before taking a new store location to their real estate committee. By having this information available we are able to prepare custom site specific packages of information to illustrate that Spokane Valley has the trade area and real estate to support a successful location. Prepared for Spokane Valley WA by Retail Strategies Jpt Retail Recruitment: Conference Representation Building relationships locally, Who We Connect With regionally, RETAIL On Your Behalf NATIONALLY on 04$4 •• •. • behalf of Spokane _ -" ICSC RF-fiC-II • RFAI FSTATF.IIVF Valley Q O 0 � 4 � 0 4 0 2018 Conferences Nashville Las Vegas Austin Atlanta Chicago Dallas New Orleans New York City Washington DC Los Angeles Charlotte Orlando Prepared for Spokane Valley WA by Retail Strategies Ji‘k Marketing Guide ii•� Ti (1rII' (0 1 e�. 4v4101101. retail strategies —'a SPOKANE VALLEY, WASHINGTON City Contact Information Focus Properties Market Guide nORO,Basinger.%ICP Chu Babas.NCP Rata,Straa13,62...31 a:.aucg.a of re*3d - ,.. - - _..:.r. s..+r.• ate.,....a..vm.r,..e... caormwrcal real ottait Ptp6€he6 rl this manta 1616/16t..s9aka.nal4r-e9 cP€1991313 MF..a1N}.w* -- loves€NNW.E..- rot,r nbrrnoton,denee contact the PC6601* 5/66.•Valve Al mans Dracut aM'oe Retail Da'ertopnwr�€ *ree�r Its ! "�-- _. may ,� m to.tient clews "'� - 50€]7o5L't O. 5147:RS#€SGW - - �r -. — - — •..asa..aew.e... n .:ani a.r'7919 .-v" Demographies.... it # 41 $ eill AptIII. $ - �,- 9. 1 1 __.. .y....w.yy !T-�`�•or f ,.- dlY -"-.{amu d,.• - ... Pep.l . Ixra�ale Mnleehae Iran-tMetIinl 166696661519/6611669 a In Rale tlnnehrid Inmene tA.erege) $ 116419 39.3 $50,410 46,933 6.43% ,6 4_29 aEROCRAP)lC PROFILE a16k tall. 5M,le 1119451 11 Mi.taaia6 ! �f Ei1.9ea 56a.5E5 60 03 126 136 111!373 Ni.: Retail Prospects Discover: Top Categories for Recruitment z .No's. FLOOR FT '4a/ DECOR rangetheory !Maaeage Envy �Rn F 1 T E 'F ,,�� Ashley Stanton HOMESTORE 'rVisionworks L AOB 0 Y" Hardware & BED BATH & Health/Fitness & LIFETIME Home Furnishings BEYONQ Personal Care FITNESS CankAtru. BAGS,`' �v.. RESTAURANT RREWNQYSE rpli �n,l,,,., .•b 0 CHIPOT LE MOD Restaurants """'°°RILL S )1 MKaz= garLden ***For the purpose of this study Focus Categories identify where the market can support the most significant growth with market conditions as they exist today. However, Retail Strategies recruitment efforts will in no way be solely limited to retailers that fall within the top four categories. Prepared for Spokane Valley WA by Retail Strategies 24 Merchant/Tenant/Developer Feedback rk RECO0 fl a 37,000 853,000 1 ,200 .r , , _,-,- y ,. .,-. ATTENDEES SQUARE FEET EXHIBITORS — 1,111i;,i* PARTICIPANTS FROM 58 COUNTRIES NE LOCKBUSTER SPECIALTY r-"" ""n.� r R' ""' L` ' "" ,� }�' ' EDUCATION & � � 1 • ::. 2CERTIFICATION 31z KEYNOTE • LEASIN 411040' - SESSIONS SPEAKERS SESSIONS = = -. �• r ' --- — _ ��%( REc0n retail strategies retail strategies ' 1e 1 I{ e E YOU ARE 1. lg. M _ a '- _ I . _ rivift '+ - r v n e <{ th • s • L ; I 11 yr' -4. . _„___. . 9 „tir � r „E . A ; r: , .. iyi „. _ . � _ ... .„.„,,..., ,..,. _....... _,.. � ,� Prepared for Spokane Valley WA by Retail Strategies Thank y ou ! There's a lot of potential here. retail strategies 120 18th Street South, Suite 120, Birmingham, AL 35233 205.314.0386 retailstrategies.com (f4) retailstrategies com ( 9) reta i I strategies � SPOKANE VALLEY WASHINGTON City Contact Information Focus Properties Market Guide ,7, Mike Basinger,AICP Chaz Bates,AICP Retail Strategies has a catalogue of retail commercialreal properties n this market nthasinger@spokanevalley.org cates�s okanevalleYorH G10210 E. prageFor information,please contact the Portfolio Spokane Valley,WA 99206 Director and/orRetail --'" Director listed 509-720-5331 office 509-720-5315 office on the front of this guide. - � .--." - - _ spokanevalleyed.org --� "••fd�' "�: `3^^f • Demographics y. as Mata pr�Tma, ,- • • , ..........„,,,*.4...._.„.7------- -,'-_ -- .. ,,---:-. --;-'_'_------------------ ,. , .,1----menr_-- -, ...„:„_ If IP .f $ it .\/ ' Ili sus s ��--� a g�p *s`rff' ++' 1,€re'-a o t aft iter l h ,4,: ^�. 7 :- .�;" � - � *tea` Population Average Age Household Income(Median) Number of Households Growth Rate Household Income(Average) 116 419 39.3 $50,410 46,933 6.43% $62,429 DEMOGRAPHIC E t nn PHID PR ti n 3 Mile Radius 5 Mile Radius 10 Mile Radius f � 2017 Estimated Population 68,371 114,983 353,015 � Daytime Population 80,062 120,138 417,923 Median HH Income $45,892 $52,230 $48,083 Number of Households 28,089 46,232 144,605 Peer Analysis Daytime Population 145,697 -......-.1 - + tv- 5 Minute DT 10 Minute DT 15 Minute DT The Peer Analysis,built by Retail Strategies along with our analytics partner(Tetradh), ^-- - ' 2017 Estimated Population 36,182 116,419 211,473 'dent f'es analogue till nodeswth'n a s 'I demographic and retail makeup.Te „,,m, Dayti me Population 50,679 145,697 288,815 Peer AnalV' d d from a 5 or 10 m' t d' t' from malor comparable Children at Home 6,303 Median HH Income $41,027 $50,410 $48,423 retail corridors throughout thecountry Thevara bles used are population income " Number of Households 15,558 46,933 86,161 daytime population market supply and gross leasable area.The following are ret ail . aedredmi�bI persons 15,538 - 10-rnin^^'^" areas that most resemble this core city. _ w„a sn�sne . Homemakers 16,366 "" Peer Trade Areas0 • North Logan UT 15.N Maln St . Student Population 32,40] "'.` ^ - l '_. Spokane Valley ...,... '"- 7:9' ngn �/ Billings 2525.22A,NI Yaklma,WA 1600E Chestnut Ave . Work at Home 2,620 ==n k Retltl'ng CA 1616 tram Dr ,..� _, Mllwauk'e,OR 15.0 Se MCloughts 81, Employed 69,269 - - _ - SM1erwootl,OR 11111 21320 Sw/anger Farms Pkwy . } Logsn,nT - 11.5100W nim°•rv. ,•• '' Unem Played 4304 a-, e .,,. „,.. O , Major Employers Fun Facts , ___ ( Company Name Employees •Its pronounced"Spo-Can"Valley not"Spo-Cane"Valley --At f .. Pemco Mutual Insurance Co 260+ •Home to the Appleway TrailwhichIs6miles of grade separated urban trail for K'serAlum num 260+ walkers,runners and bilkers 'ng along the commercial condor. T+ Trentwood Rolling Mill 260+ •Easy access to severalhit t features used by novices and professionals. �' """` Weley st Onpsptal 250+ *Average Commute T'me.20 mia nutes Bear Burnett Dalton Dillard 250+ •The Valley started as a patchwork of townships irrigation districts,or railway stops. ,_, - Rare°oavaloama�r olaar°' as°°°oval°nma�r cnoal�m°' Huntwood Custom C binefs 250+ These places were known as Dlshman Verada le,Yardley,Opportunity,Trentwood, A ,I r• "„ - ooamau®,e,a�lalag a�.aom ooluam®ala�o-alag a�.aom Franz Bakery ounet score 250+ Trent East Trent Chester Velox,Austin Evergreen Orchard Park,Irwin,and ""� American Linen 250+ Greenacres and are still'n use by some people. „igi - *Hi 205 905 5703 office 205 209 4599 office Walmart Supercenter 260+ Wagstaff 250+ J. `k , ; II,•+ Follow us! in o f V` ( 4) 'WA Af.' . W.L-'11Ce „.. .:. ,,,IX, SI.•Wjtifr- ..'....: ..'1,- .- r, aQ V. k t .r ® • • , •' L.. .T HOBBY BOBBY Total Woe a.1"'" `F �. - ,.. E F•ru[H I I;R tl i E Fe1 r , SPOKANE WRY l DOLLAR TREE Pa tyC'ty D>�L _ (moi (e3dlhtldrt ' .:. ^rav T Iia y ,� _ 6= sears JCPenney --' Pa Q I7�NY SII I�, "/ :; 1Ecnkailli - - \�j �pu�e ba«e r'• i•;I+SNR 11' ��r �E•Vr'ellesleY•Ave �.�e� (41 •. v\G�r i rv��n �O sleep number I ii i lllll'1iii W WRY illa _-, 4.- a �;-,3. z oxc s s MI /� t y Tuesday Morning SHOE REPT. PLACE 1 _ GNC Amndrnna __.. ENCORECA Q �p PAC$U N EQAGOE'�O HotneGo&i 6 SEPHORA lamrm W ICU. villa F 0 R V E R 21 r•J r IMPIANiS ® ... AMP Buckle 0 - JOAN N WR1D CZU IM1TA:•.... • • IHO O:�a. p" BARNES. NOBLE ■ ,N,ift GreatGreat Clips SI �/ i�p �fe imG))( nDtritiDno .�;.. r A •- litt �F . mor .., ->.--T-, HOLLISTER wet seal "U�}ICQ 1;s s� -. Verizon' a ° eR' Ewo.n\rICTORIAS (roMOUS .�~ ��E•Freaer cbAve f -� SF.CRFT clnrxes h5r��t 4 �_?. �a,._ - ' 1- ,•.o Ps�� ■ Claire's �REcnL o AERO I Sh M,iRM,[i � b \FE litl•A I WRY' �P s I•-=''----1 + • 1 .oNORDSTROM rack OLD NAVY IYI %* i Alf, • r� � �.,, L _ 1 T Mobile s=fig % u Delnyq ='I `9°�@ ,SUB "s F � ; t'NGR CERVOIJRET r -tl ,�— ild S _ u ; ; r 731 1 .a .• H - -` ---7-411,,,,,, •d ?�/\�W ! ,a -E Intlla na p OVr QReilly I ' t!Pli ,� cricket � a y Rarn1 / t{�/ E� n o: , , .� A �.�. z _ � - ./I, 1 — • . E•MI s n•Ave ��Comtoxt \nom E•M issio•nAve I.,vrtmmm -.� - • .r� H I�DOLLARrREE .. •..qi . II-- - 2 alittleCaesars_ Q 013 7 �,t.•• ae,00p_00- ` 71 r,, _ a ' HOP COSTCO � �.-.r-,J�i- • QUALITY i?I - lJL�� / ',la.) ' � NAPA' ' I :• 11O a� I lib - -`� z„- II dee _ 0 a- Walmart p, 125111 ,l'...- . so'. .la> 1 i' �� Y aownY JJ = ��\ '^ "'"'""''''',1'r.; Ir"�draz e.ereen.aa. I - {'int / .�',y< i 1 `r i JJif(ylube ;II.. J V.a II Y YAv LAP- - _ _ _._�I' - fi A SPOK'ANEUMW PLAZA I rillj nRE 1 , 00 M r� _ �—� E sP ly e•A • t,�I • 32 333 VPO• ] x'21 800 VP.2.` — X5,'00 VPD" T S S €�V J .•IL �fZ�!- -�' `T h �•` �n1CHEY$ " ,A Walmart SALLY BEAUTY na000veD� • [h .. aX a Ave PET RT ,,I th CAROL t •'" -. FTS A 9; L 4 E;� _® I BOSS GreatClipsKOHL'S �� 9°°doIIi 9 L3�� SUPERRAGUE F, a _� UPERCUTS J ax f�rj`R�.9':TT1 °Y SHOPKO � S ,. .. + - C=M.a LAA9LLcay11 TARGET UM w ri WAY'w • �RURRITcI " llvrla�c. R°° ROAD fb SPRAGUE S\ also :•.u OfficeDEAx BIG AuterIJty ppb, SAFEWAY OffiCeMax k•I is • Qa 'Fantastic Sams LOTS SportClips 1. Q Sprint Table 1 a , 0 • - -• A.T Dennys s,savers �� cricket �A�o a p WRY' Round 8 \ if DOLLAR TREE 'Cec Tma , HARBOR INC. 41" • 1 �Xk bion,.11'...•!' •,.'�.£� k< _ ` ` apNG cR cEmO rEi .11 IE Se�e�e.R FREIGHT • RAMADA Deseret B00)'i, LU ! ArmcnaP • a R>r ,S€_{ E 3F JYleyer T Mobile Z r' ° t ?,a , SUB ter) + GNC ® d Jiffylube ._r' ,..:,t ++'4 � 'tt" : 4 l 1. \\ 0 WAY' NAPA •\ �.. s•�I • • ^e.AVe DOLLAR TREE petco CAR TOYS 9 O ,e.:41-. - } - h wxr wuumrs t n,e'. R✓�Jrilr. � f � ri'� C' '11 - ..qs. • - ��E FIVEWGUVS 70)_il,-�LQP.IGL +.•"A 9°°dwill �/CL O =r�t)i 1� _ •tr"11 .. 'a ."t., • 4 .• - • • ty� """`l V I ani- kA ki y,4 --, •,i E•44th•Ave _- ®201]0191ialOibberUCNES(2017)Distribution Airbus OS®2017 Microsoft Corporation CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: June 5, 2018 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ® admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Administrative Report: Sullivan-Wellesley Intersection Improvement Project GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 35.77.010, Perpetual Advanced Six-Year plans for coordinated transportation program expenditures. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: • 3/10/2015: Admin report on CMAQ call for projects • 4/14/2015: Motion Consideration on CMAQ call for projects • 4/28/2015: Info Report on Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) • 6/23/2015: Council passed Resolution 15-005, Adoption of 2016 —2021 Six Year TIP • 5/23/2017: Council passed Resolution 17-011, adopting the 2018-2023 Six Year TIP, which included this project. BACKGROUND: In 2015, HDR completed a Sullivan Road Corridor Study for the City of Spokane Valley. The study identified the intersection of Sullivan and Wellesley as functioning poorly. The intersection is currently operating with a Level of Service of F, causing delays to motorists. In 2015, the City submitted a grant application and was awarded a Congestion Mitigation & Air Quality (CMAQ) grant to upgrade the intersection based on current traffic volumes and demands. Spokane Valley's intersection improvements include preliminary engineering, right-of-way acquisition, and construction to build either a single lane roundabout or a signalized intersection. Construction for the project is currently programed for 2021 with SRTC. The City is currently working with SRTC to move up the project timeline. Spokane County has been working on the Bigelow Gulch Corridor (Bigelow) Project for several years. Phase 6 of the Bigelow Gulch Corridor project will connect Bigelow Gulch to the Sullivan and Wellesley intersection, greatly increasing the traffic volumes and requiring capacity increases. The Bigelow project is currently scheduled to begin in 2020 but it is not fully funded. When this connection takes place, the intersection will need to be upgraded to a double lane roundabout or signalized intersection with larger capacity. In preparation for their project, Spokane County contributed $99,625 to the Sullivan-Wellesley Intersection Project with the intent to purchase enough right-of-way to accommodate the intersection improvements that will be triggered with the Bigelow project. The total project budget for the City of Spokane Valley's intersection improvement project is: City Match (301) $ 184,950 Spokane County (ROW Contribution) $ 99,625 CMAQ Grant $ 1,085,425 Total estimated costs $ 1,370,000 The City has been closely coordinating with Spokane County to determine if the full buildout intersection improvements can be constructed at the same time to minimize disruption to the public. The County has expressed interest in contributing financially towards the full buildout of the intersection. However, they have not yet received formal approval from the County Commissioners. Depending on the selected alternative, they may need to seek grant funds to breach the funding gap. To move forward with the design of the intersection project, City staff is looking at the design alternatives of a roundabout verses a signalized intersection. Following tonight's presentation and comments, staff plans to go to Council for a motion consideration to select a preferred design alternative on July 3, 2018. OPTIONS: Discussion only. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Discussion only. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: The total project budget is $1,370,000. STAFF CONTACT: Gloria Mantz, PE, Engineering Manager Erica Amsden, PE, Project Manager ATTACHMENTS: PowerPoint Presentation June 5, 2018 Sullivan & Wellesley Intersection Improvement Project June 5, 2018 WELCMtCIXNER.Vff Sio `alley Presentation Agenda June5, 2018 • Existing Conditions • Intersection Options • Spokane County Future Project • Selection Criteria • Project Background & Budget • Next Steps and Schedule • Traffic Analysis • Questions Spokane WELCH COMER`�JK do•OValley ENGINEERS I SURVEYORS Existing Conditions June 5, 2018 ,} .s i [ -- -_ _- _ __ F { N East Valley East Valley , ``Ai1 High School Middle School • 4-Way Stop r • Existing Level of Service (LOS) F Based on Sullivan Road Corridor Study - e� • 17 Accidents in 8 years � �� ire es e - _s �� _ _ ,:� - ': �� - • Current ADT = 13,413 Vehicles per Day :1. (vpd) ... E _& i Aill ` , 7---''''- '7:'-, '%,,I• to S`pakane WELCH-COMVEYORS Valley ENGINEERS I SURVEYORS Spokane County Future Project June 5, 2018 • New Cul-de-Sac at r Progress = „} • Majority of Traffic Using Progress Shifts to Sullivan 1 _ • Changes Vehicle Traffic �• _ ,� Patterns (Local ands: 411 Regional) -10.1 ., . • Traffic at Sullivan/Wellesley Grows SignificantlyY' " � � , • ADT in 2040 = 23,091 vpd1111, '' ' k ADT=average daily traffic q� +'.yr s. r. _ r ..; ,.*i� .40 w_ a VPD=vehicles per day lc, , r 0 i 1 .: `"i sir WELCH—COMERJK `�"'okane do.OSalle ENGINEERS I SURVEYORS y Project Background & Budget June 5, 2018 • Grant award to improve the intersection1 a City Fund 303 $ 184,950 Spokane County $ 99,625 Federal Grant $ 1,085,425 E WELLESLEY AVE _7..../.._ t Total Estimated Budget $ 1,370,000 _C,.k O\r___11----- • Interim improvement originally programmed for 2019 Construction - =: u; Fo 1 . • Spokane County contributed $99,625 for ROW for full buildout solution ',N • Spokane County Bigelow Gulch Corridor Project • Phase 6 connects Bigelow Gulch to the Sullivan/Wellesley intersection • Construction originally scheduled after 2020 • City and County have been closely coordinating to match schedules WELCH-COMER Spokane rpISINEERS I SURVEYORS Valley Design Option A : Traffic Signal June 5, 2018 1 1 II 1 JI 1 I! I MATCH IMO SPOKANE COUNTY I SULLIVAN ROAD PROJECT I II I L WELLESLEY AVE I of ❑ g C * oa j Ja r i I I1I , , 1 -. Iy eft -- „. WELCH-COMER Spokane ENGINEERS I SURVEYORS Valley Design Option B . 2- bane Roundabout June 5, 2018 I. -' NIA CN...,POI'''..rr, Sll13.MIW ROA6 PROJECT IT 1 I 1- C.fJ: . . \• I i , :/,} . 1I i - ER1Pr,4- . c=,,— . ..`c"-.. -==c,4=: e r — Spokane WELCH CDMVEYORS Valley ENGINEERS 1 —-. Intersection Options June 5, 2018 Selection Criteria — [VI Vehicle Safety 41. Air Signal '4 Pedestrian Function and Safety Bicycle Function and Safety • l Performance [VI Dependability 991 Ease of Obtaining ROW [r Future Transportation Needs 91 Familiarity and Public Acceptance • Roundabout Traffic Control During Construction Construction Cost Spokane WELCH COMER`.0 Valley ENGINEERS I SURVEYORS Criteria — Vehicle Safety June 5, 2018 Traffic Signal — 32 Conflict Points 2-Lane Roundabout — 14 Conflict Points II 0diverging spat .�« merging its* crossing spots diverging spots Reduction in collisions A, reduction j 75% r. reduction 1 '41'.'1'.'j- - - - t •�• II 0—Q-A—, + }```kyr Ni dog, ily : • Diverging y• - - i,,_ reduction Jo r I :o I Merging 0 Crossing I Ora'fll Injor lata"'.` I'+vl+str 11n ivrlliaiom r IIi, Ili, ..II-.- WELCH—COMER J ' Spokane ENGINEERS I SURVEYORS of..*Val ley Criteria — Pedestrian Safety June 5, 2018 Roundabout . • 0 • • 0 0 CD 0 • Hit by a vehicle traveling at 12 Conflict Points MPH 9 out of 10 pedestrians survive. - 0 0 0 0 • • • Hit by a vehicle traveling at 3 Traffic Signal MPH 5 out of 10 pedestrians survive. 16 Conflict Points • • • • • • • • • Hit by a vehicle traveling at 40 MPH u only 1 out of 10 pedestrians survives. WELCH—COMER Spokane 9 T. ENGINEERS I SURVEYORS Valley Criteria — Function & Safety June 5, 2018 4 • Bicyclist May Use Bike Lane r or Sidewalk - I 3:1....,y.- 1 • Turning Left • Enters Left Turn Lane, or -I I - - = • Uses Crosswalk . � •--------1 --- -- 5. 1� 4 I _ ttq, '' iii)i 1 lb — ----: AP. 11 it.41..1,n6. `-3 ii ! I - IL Spol�ane WELCH COMER`�JK Valley ENGINEERS I SURVEYORS Criteria — Function & Safety June 5, 2018 . . i 5 ii • ii . • Bicycle May Use Bike Lane or Path `.E' . „ . . ii . • Opportunity to Enter/Exit On-Street Bike Lane ,f: f 54, • Turning Left __ _ ,,,R -,, ::.... • Enters Travel Lane, or -_:,:i _______ 1 , • Exits to Use Crosswalk _ _ _ _ -- 0,=;,:-.4, .. 9 44 l,-4ir 411 oi WELCH-COMER` Spokane ENGINEERS I SURVEYORS .00Valley Criteria - Performance June 5, 2018 Level of Service • Traffic Signal — Low B • Roundabout — High B WELCH COMER`W Spol�ane Valle ENGINEERS I SURVEYORS A separate video will be shown at this point Y Criteria — Dependability June 5, 2018 Intersection Areas of Failure Example Control • Power Outages • Failed Electrical Components � , , . • Pole/Detection/Controller/Wiring << Damage - .4. cEa "` • Failed Bulbs ...... .-.•-•— • Intersection Illumination Damage • Hardscape Damage • Beacon Pole Damage • Intersection Illumination Damage -weir4 - , 00,1 WELCH-COMER`�JK Spokane ENGINEERS I SURVEYORS .00Valley Criteria — Ease of Obtaining ROW June 5, 2018 I l I I I! I1 If 1 • I I i I 1 � t RAREA 1=3993 SF ] ROW AREA 1953 SF _._.. . I 14 I f I � J.' w ly lIfI111I�i' Total Area = 73,500 sq. ft. ___ I = r YFELLESLEYAVE 'I fl t. )i) , \ 1N - _ y ow twEn 22795 SF HOW MEA 3+,373 SF'4z x ROW AREA4=76&SF I' �, '�� _ i i �. ..� f/ 011..N' 1 - / ` - ' ` `7. 1 J -ate_ .- I Total Area - r— _- ROA AREA 5=7&7 SF - __ \\ Il q 8,900 sq. ft. = � �, _ 01 4 r '--- -7- \I kk {I e=5145 - I ! - 1 , ROW AREA I .. i t I _.. r _.. - ... ,:,_-„,BL1WA7=.9 SFS?'- I I I �Ai 111 \ WELCH-COMER Spokane ENGINEERS I SURVEYORS Valley Criteria — Future Transportation Needs June5, 2018 Roundabout ' ii-4, 7;1-7 ,. • Future Roundabouts at Trent .. e a • No Widening on Sullivan -.. _ -- . %_ Between Trent & Wellesley _ � � 1 • Overpass Widening may be — Required at Trent & BNSF • Potential Lower Future Costs Exhibit 3-19 from Sullivan Road Corridor Study Spkoane WELCH COMER` Valley ENGINEERS I SURVEYORS Criteria — Future Transportation Needs June5, 2018 ' l --:,.... 11* Traffic Signal • Future Signals at Trent • Widening on Sullivan Between i $ ` Trent & Wellesley WUHAN RD • Overpass Widening Required for -:' �, I Bridges over BNSF & Trent \. a c.,% € i„-.) * f. : • • Potential Higher Future Costs .a= Exhibit 3-18 from Sullivan Road Corridor Study Spoknae WELCH—COMER`�Jf Valley ENGINEERS I SURVEYORS Criteria — Public Acceptance June 5, 2018 Outreach Public Acceptance • Public Meeting • Roundabout • Mailers • Concerns with Young Drivers • 75 Attended • Concern about Pedestrian Safety • Mixed Opinions • Two-lane Configuration is New & Unfamiliar • Traffic Signal • Familiar to the Public Spokane WELCH-COMER`ff Valley ENGINEERS I SURVEYORS Criteria - Public Acceptance : Roundabouts Near Schools June 5, 2018 1 251, P o 1 r' rilis l 1 , 11 _ !/ 1 -s 1 ! ,' 41��0 iiini��' 'r--7, - - _ �i i 1 _ ` 1 I I 1 _`' For 2-lane roundabouts near schools: "...consideration should be given to providing a pedestrian crossing island and/or an actuated rapid flashing beacon or pedestrian hybrid beacon (PHB) at each crossing." Source: Safe Routes To School Program (SR2S) Spf.okane WELCH—COMER` Valley ENGINEERS I SURVEYORS Criteria — Traffic Control During Construction June 5, 2018 • • ::: T/ "• a:: • • • - - - - - • • I _ WELCH-COMER`�JK Spokane rNOINEERS I SURVEYORS 40,0Val ley Criteria — Signal Cost Summary June 5, 2018 Interim Signal at Final Signal After Intersection Bigelow Gulch Difference Connection Design $175,000 $175,000 $0* Spokane County contributed $99,625 to the ROW phase of project Right of Way* $56,100 $135,150 $79,050 ** Actual Funding Gap = Construction $1,174,358 $1,462,323 $287,965 $35,458 + $79,050 = $114,508 (To obtain full buildout ROW per grant application) Project Cost $1,405,458 $1,772,473 $367,015 Project Budget $1,370,000 $1,370,000 Funding Gap $35,458** $402,473 Spokane WELCH CDMER`� Valley r^I�INEERS I SURVEYORS Criteria — Roundabout Cost Summary June 5, 2018 Interim Final Roundabout Roundabout at After Bigelow Gulch Difference Intersection Connection *Spokane County contributed $99,625 to the ROW phase of project Design $257,000 $275,000 $18,000 Right of Way* $265,269 $323,625 $58,356 ** Actual Funding Gap = $1,269,242 + $58.356 = $1,327,598 (To obtain full buildout ROW per grant application) Construction $2,116,973 $2,287,973 $171,000 Project Cost $2,639,242 $2,886,598 $247,356 Project Budget $1,370,000 $1,370,000 Funding Gap $1,269,242** $1,513,598 Spokane WELCH—CDMER`� Valley ENGINEERS I SURVEYORS N ext Steps and Schedule June 5, 2018 • Select a Preferred Alternative and Finalize Design • Continue to Coordinate with Spokane County to Construct Full Buildout Improvements with Spokane County Breeching Funding Gap • ROW Acquisition from August 2018 to May 2019 • Construction Currently Programed for 2021 • Spokane County's Bigelow Gulch Corridor Connection to Sullivan & Wellesley • Preliminary Engineering 2018 and Construction 2020 (Not Funded Yet) Spokane WELCH COMER`�Jf do•OValley ENGINEERS I SURVEYORS Recommendation June 5, 2018 • Traffic Signal Benefits • Lower right-of-way impacts • Lower project cost • Higher public acceptance near schools • Similar level of service as roundabout at this location • Less impacts during construction Spol�ane WELCH COMER`�JK do•OValley ENGINEERS I SURVEYORS June 5, 2018 Questions Spokane WELCH COMER`�� Valley ENGINEERS I SURVEYORS CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: June 5, 2018 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ® admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Administrative report— Code Enforcement Update GOVERNING LEGISLATION: Chapter 7.05 SVMC; chapter 17.100 SVMC; chapter 7.48 RCW. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: on January 16, 2018, Council Adopted Ordinance 18- 001 amending SVMC Chapter 7.05 for various reasons, including chronic nuisances. BACKGROUND: The City adopted chapter 7.05 SVMC relating to nuisance properties shortly after becoming a city in 2003. The most common types of nuisances we have dealt with over the years have involved accumulations of trash, junk vehicles, and accumulations of broken machinery or equipment, and enforcement of the City's land use, zoning, and building provisions. Less frequently, we deal with other types of nuisance violations such as illegal structures, encroachments on sidewalks (vegetation, debris), fire hazards, noise, dust, graffiti, and excessive yard sales. The City has altered and refined the nuisance provisions over the years to make them more effective, or to address new items as appropriate. Recently, the City Council approved regulations to address sidewalk snow removal. These complaints are handled by the Code Enforcement officer. Further, in early 2018, City Council approved chronic nuisance provisions for properties that have ongoing criminal activities. The current Code Enforcement Officer is Nicole Montano, who recently joined us from Spokane County Prosecutor's Office. In 2017, the City Council approved the addition of a part time attorney to focus on prosecution of code enforcement cases due to the increasing volume. The City hired Rachelle McFetridge as the part-time attorney in mid-January, 2018. A nuisance case may be initiated in one of several ways, including observation by City staff, on referral from another agency, or through receipt of information from citizens. When Ms. Montano initiates a code compliance investigation, she will generally engage in the following process: - visit the property in person to determine whether there is a likely violation; - if so, attempt to make contact with the owner or occupant in an effort to get compliance through the easiest means possible, voluntary compliance; - if it cannot be cleaned up immediately, a warning notice would then likely be issued to provide specific information on the nature of the violation, as well as what is necessary to cure it including applicable timeframes; - most people are interested in executing a Voluntary Compliance Agreement (VCA) with the City, which describes what will be done, including timeframes, to come into compliance. Successful completion of the terms of the VCA results in suspension of the penalty; - staff would follow up after the time for compliance in the warning notice had expired. If the violation was taken care of, the City would issue a letter to that effect; Page 1 of 2 - if the violation had not been eliminated, the City would issue a Notice and Order, which if not appealed, assesses a minimum penalty of$500 and identifies the time by which the violation must be abated by the property owner or occupant; - if the Notice and Order is not appealed, and the violation not cleaned up, then the case would get referred to the Office of the City Attorney for further enforcement action; - the Office of the City Attorney attempts to contact violators as well in an effort to get compliance instead of filing suit in Superior Court. If we are successful, then the City will issue a letter that the property is in compliance; - if we don't get a sufficient response, we file suit and seek an abatement order from the Court which will order the owner/occupant to remove the violations and, if they fail to do so, authorize the City to enter the property after 20 days to abate the violation. After such an abatement, the City is authorized to file a lien against the property in the full amount, however only the first $2,000 of that amount is a high priority lien on par with County and municipal taxes. We generally have to wait until the property transfers before we get paid the rest of the money we spent on abatement. There are some cases where the City never gets paid, however, the City was able to assist the neighborhood in removing a blight that was likely reducing their property values. Tonight, staff will provide an update on the City's code enforcement program, including the current activities they are engaged in, current statistics and trends, and ongoing projects. On average, the City handles 330 new compliance cases annually. Of that number, the Office of the City Attorney has been forwarded an average of 30 cases per year since 2013 to pursue potential legal action. OPTIONS: Discussion. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Discussion. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: N/A. STAFF CONTACT: Rachelle McFetridge, Attorney; Nicole Montano, Code Enforcement Officer; ATTACHMENTS: PowerPoint presentation. Page 2 of 2 2018 Code Enforcement Update Rachelle McFetridge Attorney, City of Spokane Valley Nicole Montano Code Enforcement Officer June 5, 2018 City of Spokane Valley- Office of the City Attorney "Illim1111111,-1Mop C aci=eEtTfo Joint effort from multiple departments Primary team consists of: Code Enforcement Officer: Monitors City for possible nuisance violations and investigates complaints of possible code violations. Areas include but are not limited to nuisance, signage, occupancy, hazardous sidewalks, construction, land use and zoning, building, animals, noise, dumping, clearing, grading, filling, polluting, and other code related violations. Conducts field investigations and gathers evidence. Makes determinations of violations and issues administrative warnings and notice and orders. Works with defendants and complainants through code enforcement process. Development Services Coordinator and Building Official: Provide support to Code Enforcement Officer as necessary. Office of the City Attorney: Provides legal support to Code Enforcement Officer. Works through Superior Court to obtain orders and warrants of abatement when defendants will not voluntarily clean up violations. City of Spokane Valley- Office of the City Attorney Cade= En forc - S - of ..,, A Of N %, ..,, , , 0 ti 1.* ' Since January 1, 2,018 ` _ Riff - 307 cases closed - Includes active cases from prior _._ ! _w» years and new cases from 2018 w r 4 •. 316 new complaints • - . ' . -s -, , . The number of nuisance and r 4 - .'' � : ye,... snow complaints has increased _4. v a `' " _ this year, likely due to the snow ; M1 = '4.,: removal regulations adopted in ¢Ak 6 '�� . the fall of 2017 and other .; nuisance regulations adopted in early 2018. t City of Spokane Valley- Office of the City Attorney 3 Code Enforcement Snapshot Historical comparison January 1 - May 30, 2018: 307 cases closed, 316 new complaints 2017: 522 total cases 2016: 462 total cases 2015: 383 total cases 2014: 354 total cases 2013: 36o total cases City of Spokane Valley- Office of the City Attorney 4 =,_-_- Co_cte,En forcement-S n apsli o=t Code Enforcement currently has 49 _ _ ''��`,.a:1 :, f ,,i1--.. active cases s . , This does not include active cases referred to the City Attorney's Office , ' ,:.. 1 fi Code enforcement continues to monitor { cases referred for legal action, and is '' i , responsible for: ` ,! Communicating with violators in ongoing „,0 ,,, ..1' `, effort to promote compliance. Confirming compliance prior to closure of $. _ legal case. Arranging and managing any abatement actions required to bring properties into compliance. 3s Proactive identification of violations when �' 1, � �` - ,, possible. City of Spokane Valley- Office of the City Attorney n orcénientSna p s Compliance efforts Goal is voluntary compliance Considerable time and work with complainants and property owners to resolve nuisance issues with minimal cost and providing property owners every opportunity to bring their own property into compliance without the need for fines, legal action, or expending city resources to abate nuisances. This includes multiple site visits, calls with complainants, property owners, tenants, mortgage companies, or property managers, sending an initial letter, warning notices, notices and orders, follow up letters, voluntary compliance agreements, and anything else necessary to promote nuisance resolution. Balance of voluntary compliance with negative impact on neighborhoods and need for timely compliance. Increased code enforcement presence and coordinated efforts with City Attorney's Office has improved citizen awareness of the ability to address nuisance and code enforcement violations, resulting in an increasing number of complaints and issues reported to the City. City of Spokane Valley- Office of the City Attorney n orcementSnapshut ______ ... '„ _ -.. •iL` r'! Mi+F i. ~P' ... Y. ..... .` 4 'lam t -. p W +.:_• sk i i ' -'1 . ,--,..--.. _-_,--.-- 1*,,( ' : ' *-t.c41'... 4- -4'...1.41,-- ' 1: � .. � � 4 Am- Ai-9 ° ''' -+ '''''''?Z."6'-'- `4,91 F '-'4 P sf-y: ce, • t g • sr. A.!' - 4. .1-:''t-:Az-.10' --,e4.N., ir.,,,,,e_.'4..S., ,k. . � yi eit - - - 1�rr�' � - .4”" tet'`,.• fi - City o Spo ane Va ey- 0 ice o the City Attorney 7 Legal_Enent3napshot — Office of City4- Attorney Since January 1, 2018 14 cases closed 53 active cases 12 cases filed with court 2 judgments 14 cases pending to be filed with the court 12 cases brought into compliance and Remaining cases still in process of closed prior to litigation through work attempting pre-litigation resolution with with Code Enforcement and the City property owners by working with citizens to Attorney's Office resolve nuisance issues on their property 4 distressed properties have been sold or without litigation. are in the process of closing; which includes the cleanup of the property, Saves time, as the court process takes much longer to achieve a compelled resolution, where payment of any fines, and satisfaction of a voluntary resolution is generally faster. applicable judgments. Court process is more expensive for the City 21 new cases and the property owner, resulting in judgments against the violating citizen and lien on the property in question. City of Spokane Valley- Office of the City Attorney Legal EnentSna pshot — Office of City =4- Attorney __ .. r ,.,„,, t,;;:' '.,,,„''' ' 4igt a ' - it '' .i " - ' - m - - y• RI 4 1"41. '14111g fes/ ".^.2.A!. ro aF 4 - P -yam r ,. sr City of Spokane Valley- Office of the City Attorney 9 Issues Contributing to Nuisance Properties Property owners/tenants who elect not to utilize weekly municipal garbage services, often to avoid the monthly bill, which leads to accumulation of garbage that owners cannot or do not remove. Long term neglect and lack of awareness of municipal codes. Aging property owners who can no longer maintain their property. Death of an owner, with no probate or formal transfer of ownership. Substance abuse. Mental illness or hoarding behavior. Foreclosure. City of Spokane Valley- Office of the City Attorney ro ronic Nuisance ( Crimina I Activit y City Council adopted new chronic nuisance provisions in early 2018 to deal with properties with chronic criminal activity. City Attorney's Office has been actively working with the Spokane Valley Police on chronic nuisance properties. We are preparing our first cases dealing with chronic nuisance properties. These are properties that have repeated, documented criminal activity. The criminal activity is documented by law enforcement and referred to the City Attorney's Office. Should have more case resolution information in the next 6 months. City of Spokane Valley- Office of the City Attorney Other Related Projects Ongoing review and updates to enforcement and litigation process. Increase opportunities to resolve code violations prior to litigation. Shorten resolution timelines Promote efficiency and reduce City costs when possible. Drafting updated and new code provisions related to recreational vehicle and camping use. To reduce nuisance violations. To uphold public safety in public parks, on public property, and on City streets. City of Spokane Valley- Office of the City Attorney CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: June 5, 2018 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ® admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Administrative report— Hearing Examiner services GOVERNING LEGISLATION: Chapter 39.34 RCW; chapter 18.20 SVMC. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: The City has contracted with Spokane County for hearing examiner services since the City's inception in 2003. BACKGROUND: Mike Dempsey served in the role of Hearing Examiner for both Spokane County and Spokane Valley from 2003 until December 31, 2017. Spokane County then hired David Hubert as the new Hearing Examiner. Mr. Hubert has heard several matters in 2018, but has also recused himself from hearing two matters relating to development applications from Diamond Rock Construction, which is owned by Dennis Crapo. Mr. Hubert apparently has a long-standing relationship with the Crapo family which creates a potential issue regarding the Appearance of Fairness Doctrine. This doctrine relates to actual or potential conflicts of interest in decision-makers, and ensures that parties appearing before such decision-makers are free from such conflicts. This doctrine is critical in the public having confidence that critical land-use decisions are made on objective bases, rather than on personal relationships. Staff want to make extremely clear that neither Mr. Hubert nor Mr. Crapo are believed to be engaging in conduct that would violate the Appearance of Fairness Doctrine. Mr. Crapo owns a large amount of residential property in the City, and is a very active developer. Based on their prior relationship, Mr. Hubert has been careful to recuse himself from matters relating to Mr. Crapo. Unfortunately, this is creating a situation for the City where it has multiple hearing examiners, Mr. Hubert and a pro tem hearing examiner from the City of Spokane, Brian McGinn. This results in staff needing to work with two separate staff to prepare for various matters (not at the same time), including staff reports, scheduling, noticing, updates regarding the Spokane Valley Municipal Code, etc. Staff believes it would be in the best interests of the City to terminate the interlocal agreement for provision of hearing examiner services and determine how best to obtain such services from another party. The interlocal agreement requires a minimum of 180 days' notice for any termination. The timing of this notice reflects the City's attempt to minimize any budgetary impact this action would have on the County as a mid-year action. As such, any new hearing examiner the City hired would not start until January 1, 2019. If Council agrees with this proposed action, staff would begin the process of identifying how the services would be provided by somebody else. The following is a list of the hourly rates the City has paid for these services from Spokane County over the past three years, and which we anticipate would be similar into the future: 2015 - $12,639 ($140 per hour) 2016 - $21,662 ($137 per hour) 2017 - $30,021 ($141 per hour) OPTIONS: (1) Discuss whether to give 180 days' notice to Spokane County for termination of the interlocal agreement for provision of hearing examiner services; or (2) take other action as appropriate. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Consensus for staff to bring back a motion to give notice to Spokane County of termination of the "Interlocal Agreement for Hearing Examiner Services in the City of Spokane Valley." BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Unknown. STAFF CONTACT: Cary Driskell, City Attorney. ATTACHMENTS: DRAFT ADVANCE AGENDA as of May 31,2018; 2:00 p.m. Please note this is a work in progress; items are tentative To: Council& Staff From: City Clerk,by direction of City Manager Re: Draft Schedule for Upcoming Council Meetings June 12,2018, Formal 6 pm Meeting cancelled June 12,2018, Special Meeting,Budget Workshop (8:30 a.m.—3:30 p.m.) [due Tue June 51 Spokane Valley City Council Chambers June 19,2018, Study Session,with action items 6:00 p.m. [due Tue June 12 ACTION ITEMS: 1. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 2. Second Reading Ordinance 18-012 CTA 0002,Hotel/Motel in Industrial Zone—M.Palaniuk (15 minutes) NON-ACTION ITEMS: 3. ITS/SRTMC Discussion—John Hohman,Ray Wright, and Becky Spangle of WSDOT (30 minutes) 4. BNSF 2nd Rail Project Update—Bill Helbig,John Hohman (15 minutes) 5. Advance Agenda—Mayor Higgins (5 minutes) 6. Info Only: Department Reports (normally due for the June 26 meeting) [*estimated meeting: 70 mins] June 26,2018,Formal 6:00 p.m.Meeting cancelled June 26-29, 2018:AWC Annual Conference, Yakima, WA July 3,2018, Study Session, 6:00 p.m. [due Tue June 261 ACTION ITEM: 1. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll, minutes) (5 minutes) 2.Motion Consideration: Bid Award: Argonne Rd Preser.Project,Broadway to Indiana—G.Mantz (15 min) 3.Motion Consideration: Preferred Alt: Sullivan&Wellesley Inter. Improv.-E.Amsden, G.Mantz(10 min) NON-ACTION ITEM: 4. Sullivan Bridge Project Completion—Erica Amsden, Gloria Mantz (15 minutes) 5. Advance Agenda—Mayor Higgins (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting: 50 mins] July 10,2018,Formal meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due MON July 21 1. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 2.Motion Consideration: Economic Analysis of Venues&Events re Tourism—C. Taylor (20 minutes) 3. Admin Report: Telephone Utility Tax—Chelsie Taylor (20 minutes) 4. Admin Report: Street Fund 101 —Chelsie Taylor,Erik Lamb,John Hohman (20 minutes) 5. Advance Agenda—Mayor Higgins (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting: 70 mins] July 17,2018, Study Session,6:00 p.m. [due Tue July 10] 1. Aging &Long Term Care of Eastern Washington—Lynn Kimball,Exe. Director (20 minutes) 2. Council Goals/Priorities for Lodging Tax—Chelsie Taylor (15 minutes) 3. Advance Agenda -Mayor Higgins (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting: 40 mins] July 24,2018,Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Tue July 17] 1. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 2. Admin Report: Quarterly Police Department Report—Chief Werner (10 minutes) 3. Advance Agenda—Mayor Higgins (5 minutes) 4. Info Item: Department Reports [*estimated meeting: mins] Draft Advance Agenda 5/31/2018 2:46:41 PM Page 1 of 3 July 31,2018, Study Session, 6:00 p.m. [due Tue July 241 ACTION ITEMS: 1.Motion Consideration: Council Goals/Priorities For Lodging Tax—Chelsie Taylor (15 minutes) NON-ACTION ITEMS: 2. Advance Agenda—Mayor Higgins (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting: mins] August 7,2018 Meeting Cancelled—National Night Out August 14,2018,Formal meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Tue Aug 71 1. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 2. Advance Agenda—Mayor Higgins (5 minutes) August 21,2018, Study Session,6:00 p.m. [due Tue Aug 141 1. Estimated Revenues&Expenditures 2019 Budget—Chelsie Taylor (20 minutes) 2. Advance Agenda—Mayor Higgins (5 minutes) August 28,2018,Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Tue Aug 211 1. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 2. Advance Agenda—Mayor Higgins (5 minutes) 3. Info Item: Department Reports Sept 4,2018, Study Session,6:00 p.m. [due Tue Aug 281 1. Advance Agenda—Mayor Higgins (5 minutes) Sept 11,2018,Formal meeting Format,6:00 p.m. fdue Tue Sept 41 1. PUBLIC HEARING#1: 2019 Revenues including Property Taxes—Chelsie Taylor (15 minutes) 2. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes;motion to set Oct 9 budget hearing) (5 minutes) 3. Advance Agenda—Mayor Higgins (5 minutes) Sept 18,2018, Study Session,6:00 p.m. [due Tue Sept 111 1. Admin Report: Proposed Ordinance Adopting 2019 Property Taxes—Chelsie Taylor (10 minutes) 2. Outside Agencies Presentations (Economic Dev& Social Services combined)—Chelsie Taylor—90 minutes 3. Advance Agenda -Mayor Higgins (5 minutes) Sept 25,2018,Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Tue Sept 18] 1. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 2. City Manager Presentation of 2019 Preliminary Budget—Mark Calhoun (45 minutes) 3. Advance Agenda—Mayor Higgins (5 minutes) 4. Info Item: Department Reports Oct 2,2018, Study Session,6:00 p.m. fdue Tue Sept 25 1. Budget Amendment,2018—Chelsie Taylor (10 minutes) 2. Advance Agenda—Mayor Higgins (5 minutes) Oct 9,2018,Formal meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Tue Oct 2] 1. PUBLIC HEARING#2: 2019 Budget—Chelsie Taylor (20 minutes) 2. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 3. First Reading Ordinance 18- ,Property Tax—Chelsie Taylor (10 minutes) 4. Advance Agenda—Mayor Higgins (5 minutes) Draft Advance Agenda 5/31/2018 2:46:41 PM Page 2 of 3 Oct 16,2018, Study Session,6:00 p.m. [due Tue Oct 91 1. Advance Agenda—Mayor Higgins (5 minutes) Oct 23,2018,Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Tue Oct 161 1. PUBLIC HEARING: 2018 Budget Amendment—Chelsie Taylor (10 minutes) 2. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 3. Second Reading Ordinance 18- ,Property Tax—Chelsie Taylor (10 minutes) 4. First Reading Ordinance 18- ,adopting 2018 Budget Amendment—Chelsie Taylor (10 minutes) 5. First Reading Ordinance 18- , adopting 2019 Budget—Chelsie Taylor (10 minutes) 6.Motion Consideration: Outside Agency Allocation of Funds—Chelsie Taylor (20 minutes) 7. Admin Report: Quarterly Police Department Report—Chief Werner (10 minutes) 8. Advance Agenda—Mayor Higgins (5 minutes) 9. Info Item: Department Reports *time for public or Council comments not included OTHER PENDING AND/OR UPCOMING ISSUES/MEETINGS: Animal Control Regulations (SVMC 7.30) Camping in RVs Donation Recognition Duplex Density Electrical Inspections Governance Manual Legislative Remote Testimony(Chambers) LTAC/Council Jt Mtg (Aug?) Naming City Facilities Protocol Neighborhood Restoration Program Police Dept. Quarterly Rpt(April,July, Oct, Jan) Police Precinct Lease Renewal(Nov '18) Sign Ordinance Street Addressing Standard St. Illumination(ownership,cost,location) St. O&M Pavement Preservation Tobacco 21 Resolution Utility Facilities in ROW Draft Advance Agenda 5/31/2018 2:46:41 PM Page 3 of 3