The URL can be used to link to this page

2018, 06-19 Study SessionAGENDA SPOKANE VALLEY CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION FORMAT (with some action items) Tuesday, June 19, 2018 6:00 p.m. CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10210 E Sprague Avenue (Please Silence Your Cell Phones During the Meeting) CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL ACTION ITEMS: 1. CONSENT AGENDA: consists of items considered routine which are approved as a group. Any member of Council may ask that an item be removed from the Consent Agenda to be considered separately. Proposed Motion: I move to approve the Consent Agenda. a. Approval of claim vouchers on June 19, 2018 Request for Council Action Form Total: $2,335,687.72 b. Approval of Payroll for Pay Period Ending May 31, 2018: $472,953.53 c. Approval of May 22, 2018 Council Meeting Minutes, Formal Format d. Approval of May 29, 2018 Council Meeting Minutes, Study Session Format e. Approval of June 5, 2018 Council Meeting Minutes, Study Session Format 2. Second Reading Proposed Ordinance 18-012, Code Text Amendment, Hotel/Motel in Industrial Zone - Marty Palaniuk [public comment] 3. Motion Consideration: Termination Notice to Spokane Co.re Hearing Examiner Interlocal —Cary Driskell [public comment] 4. Motion Consideration: Land Acquisition, 729 S Carnahan — Cary Driskell, Bill Helbig [public comment] PUBLIC COMMENTS: This is an opportunity for the public to speak on any subject except those action items above, as public comments will be taken on those items at the time those items are discussed. When you come to the podium, please state your name and city residence for the record and limit remarks to three minutes. NON -ACTION ITEMS: DISCUSSION LEADER SUBJECT/ACTIVITY GOAL 5. John Hohman, Ray Wright, and Intelligent Transportation System/ Discussion/Information Ms. Becky Spangle of WSDOT Spokane Regional Transportation Management Center (SRTMC) 6. Bill Helbig Burlington Northern/Santa Fe Discussion/Information Railway, 2nd Rail Project Update 7. Bill Helbig, Ray Wright 22nd Avenue Traffic Discussion/Information 8. Cary Driskell Repeal of SVMC 2.45 Discussion/Information 9. Mayor Higgins Advance Agenda Discussion/Information Study Session Agenda, June 19, 2018 Page 1 of 2 10. Information Only (will not be reported or discussed): Department Reports 11. Mayor Higgins Council Check in Discussion/Information 12. Mark Calhoun City Manager Comments Discussion/Information 13. Executive Session [RCW 42.30.110(1)(b) and (1)(i)]: Potential Land Acquisition, Potential Litigation ADJOURN Study Session Agenda, June 19, 2018 Page 2 of 2 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: June 19, 2018 Department Director Approval: El Check all that apply: ►.t consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Approval of the Following Vouchers: VOUCHER 05/31/2018 06/01/2018 06/04/2018 06/05/2018 06/06/2018 06/07/2018 06/12/2018 06/12/2018 LIST VOUCHER NUMBERS 44754-44759 44760 44761-44791; 4423786 7636-7647 6296; 6298; 6300; 6306-6308; 6310; 6321; 4479 44793-44818 7648-7672 44819-44841 2 GRAND TOTAL AMOUNT $9,430.55 $147.25 $1,899,100.67 $1,055.00 $326,623.96 $34,240.84 $3,407.65 $61,681.80 TOTAL: $2,335,687.72 #001- General Fund 001.011.000.511. 001.013.000.513. 001.013.015.515. 001.016.000. 001.018.013.513. 001.018.014.514. 001.018.016.518. 001.032.000. 001.058.050.558. 001.058.051.558. 001.058.055.558. 001.058.056.558. 001.058.057.558 001.076.000.576. 001.076.300.576. 001.076.301.571. 001.076.302.576. 001.076.304.575. 001.076.3 05.571. 001.090.000.511. 001.090.000.514. 001.090.000.517. 001.090.000.518. 001.090.000.519. 001.090.000.540. 001.090.000.550. 001.090.000.560. 001.090.000.594. 001.090.000.595. Explanation of Fund Numbers found on City Council City Manager Legal Public Safety Deputy City Manager Finance Human Resources Public Works CED - Administration CED — Economic Development CED — Development Services -Engineering CED — Development Services -Planning CED — Building Parks & Rec—Administration Parks & Rec-Maintenance Parks & Rec-Recreation Parks & Rec- Aquatics Parks & Rec- Senior Center Parks & Rec-CenterPlace General Gov't- Council related General Gov't -Finance related General Gov't -Employee supply General Gov't- Centralized Services General Gov't -Other Services General Gov't -Transportation General Gov't -Natural & Economic General Gov't -Social Services General Gov't -Capital Outlay General Gov't -Pavement Preservation Voucher Lists Other Funds 101— Street Fund 103 — Paths & Trails 105 — Hotel/Motel Tax 106 — Solid Waste 120 - CenterPlace Operating Reserve 121— Service Level Stabilization Reserve 122 — Winter Weather Reserve 204 — Debt Service 301 — REET 1 Capital Projects 302 — REET 2 Capital Projects 303 — Street Capital Projects 309 — Parks Capital Grants 310 — Civic Bldg Capital Projects 311 -- Pavement Preservation 312 — Capital Reserve 314 — Railroad Grade Separation Projects 402 — Stormwater Management 403 — Aquifer Protection Area 501 — Equipment Rental & Replacement 502 — Risk Management RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to approve attached list of claim vouchers. [Approved as part of the Consent Agenda, or may be removed and discussed separately.] STAFF CONTACT: Chelsie Taylor, Finance Director ATTACHMENTS: Voucher Lists vchlist 05131/2018 3:36:20PM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: 1 Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 44754 5/31/2018 001606 BANNER BANK 44755 5/31/2018 001606 BANNER BANK 6368 May 201'8 6368 May 2018 6368 May 2018 6368 May 2018 6368 May 2018 6368 May 2018 6368 May 2018 6368 May 2018 6368 May 2018 6368 May 2018 6368 May 2018 6368 May 2018 6368 May 2018 6368 May 2018 6368 May 2018 6368 May 2018 9713 May 2018 9713 May 2018 9713 May 2018 9713 May 2018 9713 May 2018 9713 May 2018 9713 May 2018 9713 May 2018 9713 May 2018 9713 May 2018 9713 May 2018 9713 May 2018 9713 May 2018 9713 May 2018 9713 May 2018 9713 May 2018 9713 May 2018 Fund/Dept 001.018.014.514 001.033.000.518 101.042.000.542 001.040.041.558 001.018.014.514 001.040.041.558 001.018.016.518 001.018.016.518 001.018.016.518 001.090.000.518 101.042.000.542 001.040.042.558 001.018.014.514 101.042.000.542 101.042.000.542 101.042.000.542 001.040.043.558 001.040.043.558 001.033.000.518 001.040.042.558 001.033.000.518 101.042.000.543 001.033.000.518 101.042.000.543 001.040.042.558 001.040.043.558 001.040.043.558 001.033.000.518 001.033.000.518 001.033.000.518 001.040.041.558 001.040.043.524 001.040.041.558 Description/Account Amount ACCIS LOWE'S ASPHALT INSTITUTE - PAYPAL LAKE ROOSEVELT FORUM - PAYPF ACCIS SPOKANE RIVER FORUM CRAIG'S LIST BOXWOOD TECHNOLOGY - ASCE CRAIGSLJST AVTECH SOFTWARE INC INSTITUTE OF TRANSPORTATION GREATER SPOKANE INC ACCIS ASPHALT KINGDOM BANNER INT'L TRANSACTION FEE ADJUST FOR PREVIOUS OVERPAY Total : WAYFAIR GALETON GLOVES AMAZON CENEX ZIP TRIP AMAZON ULINE DIVINE CORPORATION M&L SUPPLY THRIFTY RENTAL ULINE ULINE WALMART HARBOR FREIGHT WAYFAI R JIFFY LUBE PERFORMANCE LUBE JIFFY LUBE -75.00 232.98 50.00 165.00 75.00 25.00 25.00 295.00 25.00 199.95 1,149.00 120.00 75.00 582.95 5.25 -0.01 2,950.12 -435.19 104.62 8.67 9.78 142.53 798.96 100.10 119.23 208.98 377.10 330.25 125.16 61.29 387.24 452.01 41.80 -266.18 Page: 1 vchlist 0513/12018 3:36:20PM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: 2 Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor invoice 44755 5/31/2018 001606 BANNER BANK 44756 5/31/2018 001606 BANNER BANK 44757 5/31/2018 001606 BANNER BANK 44758 5/31/2018 001606 BANNER BANK 44759 5/31/2018 001606 BANNER BANK (Continued) 9713 May 2018 8573 May 2018 8573 May 2018 8573 May 2018 8573 May 2018 8573 May 2018 8573 May 2018 8599 May 2018 8599 May 2018 8599 May 2018 8599 May 2018 8599 May 2018 8599 May 2018 8599 May 2018 8599 May 2018 8599 May 2018 8599 May 2018 8599 May 2018 5214 May 2018 5214 May 2018 5214 May 2018 8557 May 2018 8557 May 2018 8557 May 2018 8557 May 2018 8557 May 2018 8557 May 2018 8557 May 2018 Fund/Dept 001.040.043.558 001.018.016.518 001.018.014.514 001.018.014.514 001.018.014.514 001.011.000.511 001.033.000.518 001.076.305.575 001.076.305.575 001.076.305.575 001.076.305.575 001.076.305.575 001.076.305.575 001.076.305.575 001.076.305.575 001.076.305.575 001.076.305.575 001.076.305.575 001.040.041.558 001.018.013.513 001.018.013.513 001.011.000.511 001.011.000.511 001.011.000.511 001.011.000.511 001.011.000.511 001.011.000.511 001.011.000.511 DescriptionfAccount Amount ENZIAN INN Total : FRED PRYOR CAREERTRACK GFOA GFOA GFOA DISPLAYS2GO AMAZON.COM OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT WEBSTAURANT HOME DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT DOLLAR TREE MICHAEL'S STORES RISE VISION EXXON MOBIL ENTERPRISE RENT -A -CAR HILTON HOTELS DULUTH TRADING CO DELTA AIRLINES 5/8/18 PRICELINE Total : Total : Total : SCRAPS HOPE FOUNDATION SCRAPS HOPE FOUNDATION SCRAPS HOPE FOUNDATION SCRAPS HOPE FOUNDATION GSI FAMILY PROMISE OF SPOKANE FAMILY PROMISE OF SPOKANE 245.08 2,811.43 149.00 377.00 377.00 377.00 91.44 109.90 1,481.34 107.67 54.39 228.31 323.77 54.37 23.94 44.65 -216.52 42.00 203.26 12.76 878.60 54.34 323.40 4.38 382.12 50.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 20.00 60.00 60.00 Page: 2 vchlist 05/3112018 3:36:20PM Voucher List Page: 3 Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 44759 5/31/2018 001606 BANNER BANK (Continued) 8557 May 2018 001.011.000.511 VALLEYFEST 50.00 8557 May 2018 001.011.000.511 VALLEYFEST 50.00 8557 May 2018 001.011.000.511 SPOKANE LILAC FESTIVAL 35.00 8557 May 2018 001.011.000.511 SPOKANE LILAC FESTIVAL 35.00 8557 May 2018 001.011.000.511 GSI 20.00 8557 May 2018 001.011.000.511 GREATER SPOKANE INC 25.00 8557 May 2018 001.011.000.511 EVENTBRITE 48.47 8557 May 2018 001.011.000.511 EVENTBRITE 48.47 8557 May 2018 001.011.000.511 FAMILY PROMISE SPOKANE 60.00 8557 May 2018 001.011.000.511 SPOKANE RIVER FORUM 25.00 8557 May 2018 001.011.000.511 SIMPLEVIEW 40.00 8557 May 2018 001.011.000.511 PAYPAL- INLAND NW PARTNERS 80.00 8557 May 2018 001.011.000.511 GSI 35.00 8557 May 2018 001,011.000.511 GSI 35.00 Total : 926.94 6 Vouchers for bank code : apbank Bank total : 9,430.55 6 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers : 9,430.55 Page: 3 vchiist 06/01/2018 2:27:14PM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: �1f Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 44760 6/1/2018 006579 JACKSON, ADAM 1 Vouchers for bank code : apbank 1 Vouchers in this report I, the undersigned, do certify under penalty of perjury, that the materials have been furnished, the services rendered, or the labor performed as described herein and that the claim is just, due and an unpaid obligation against the City of Spokane Valley, and that I am authorized to authenticate and certify said claim. Finance Director Date Council member reviewed: Mayor Date Council Member Date Expenses 001.040.042.558 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 147.25 Total : 147.25 Bank total : 147.25 Total vouchers : 147.25 Page: vchlist 06/04/2018 9:09:49AM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: ` fi Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 44761 6/4/2018 000958 AAA SWEEPING LLC 61339-A 44762 6/4/2018 002816 ABLE CLEAN-UP TECHNOLOGIES INC 18307 44763 6/4/2018 006614 AIR REPS LLC 0072984 -IN 44764 6/4/2018 006403 AMERICAN TIRE DISTRIBUTORS INC 5108439829 S108440195 44765 6/4/2018 003076 AMSDEN, ERICA 44766 6/4/2018 002517 BROWN BEARING CO INC 44767 6/4/2018 000322 CENTURYLINK 44768 6/4/2018 002920 DIRECTV INC 44769 6/4/2018 003274 EXCHANGE PUBLISHING LLC 44770 6/4/2018 003261 FEHR & PEERS EXPENSES 6447721 6463396 MAY 2018 34141038145 490998 490999 491002 491003 491004 491005 491006 491007 Fund/Dept 402.402.000.531 101.042.000.542 001.033.000.518 101.042.000.542 101.042.000.542 001.040.041.543 101.000.000.542 101.000.000.542 001.090.000.518 101.042.000.543 001.013.000.513 001.040.042.558 001.013.000.513 001.013.000.513 001.040.043.558 001.040.043.558 001.040.043.558 001.040.043.558 122444 001.040.042.558 Description/Account Amount STREET SWEEPING Total : EMERGENCY SPILL RESPONSE Total : SUPPLIES: CITY HALL Total : TIRES FOR PATCH TRAILER TIRE FOR PATCH TRAILER Total : EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT Total : SUPPLIES - SNOWPLOWS SUPPLIES. - SNOWPLOWS CITY HALL PHONES Total : Total : CABLE SERVICE FOR MAINTENAN Total : LEGAL PUBLICATION ADVERTISING LEGAL PUBLICATION LEGAL PUBLICATION LEGAL PUBLICATION LEGAL PUBLICATION LEGAL PUBLICATION LEGAL PUBLICATION Total : 90, 681.85 90,681.85 1,055.36 1,055.36 149.14 149.14 573.20 143.30 716.50 36.52 36.52 32.92 39.23 72.15 238.54 238.54 70.99 70.99 19.50 30.00 23.70 90.06 82.16 77.42 77.42 75.84 476.10 BARKERIBNSF GRADE SEPARATIC 4,787.50 Page: —1"~ vchlist 06104/2018 9:09:49AM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 44770 6/4/2018 003261 FEHR & PEERS 44771 6/4/2018 001447 FREE PRESS PUBLISHING INC 44772 6/4/2018 000007 GRAINGER 44773 6/4/2018 006579 JACKSON, ADAM 44774 6/4/2018 000012 JOURNAL OF BUSINESS 44775 6/4/2018 001944 LANCER LTD 44776 6/4/2018 004632 LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS 44777 6/4/2018 002203 NAPA AUTO PARTS (Continued) 122518 48635 48640 48641 48642 48643 48645 9778606880 9781303319 9783966618 9783966626 9783966634 9789014041 2nd Picture 321808 0469605 70617954 0538-866300 0538-866736 0538-866844 0538-866968 Fund/Dept 001.090.000.513 001.013.000.513 001.040.043.558 001.013.000.513 001.040.043.558 001.040.043.558 001.040.043.558 001.040.041.558 402.402.000.531 001.033.000.518 001.033.000.518 001.033.000.518 101.042.000.542 001.018.016.518 001.040.042.558 001.011.000.511 001.076.305.575 001.033.000.518 001.033.000.518 001.033.000.518 001.033.000.518 Description/Account Amount SOUTH BARKER CORRIDOR STUD Total : LEGAL PUBLICATION LEGAL PUBLICATION LEGAL PUBLICATION LEGAL PUBLICATION LEGAL PUBLICATION LEGAL PUBLICATION Total : SAFETY EQUIP - CPW ENGINEERII SMALL TOOLS/MINOR EQUIP- STC OPERATING SUPPLIES: CITY HALL SMALL TOOLS/MINOR EQUIP - CIT OPERATING SUPPLIES: CITY HALL OPERATING SUPPLIES: STREET Total : 'PICTURE IT' WELLNESS CAMPAIC Total : Total : Total Total : MAG FULL PAGE BUSINESS CARDS TELECOM SERVICES SUPPLIES FOR 3-502 2005 CHEVY SUPPLIES FOR 3-502 2005 CHEVY SUPPLIES FOR 3-502 2005 CHEVY SUPPLIES FOR 3-502 2005 CHEVY Total : 2,237.78 7,025.28 63.45 93.50 101.15 91.80 91.80 89.25 530.95 6.91 78.16 66.11 74.93 75.95 39.04 341.10 15.00 15.00 1,730.00 1,730.00 56.04 56.04 1,350.85 1,350.85 387.12 420.73 47.19 -420.73 434.31 Page: —� vchlist 06104/2018 9:09:49AM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: -3— Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 44778 6/4/2018 000662 NAT'L BARRICADE & SIGN CO 44779 6/4/2018 003090 NORTH 40 OUTFITTERS 44780 6/4/2018 000652 OFFICE DEPOT INC. 44781 6/4/2018 004621 OREILLYAUTOMOTIVE STORES INC 44782 6/4/2018 005238 PHILLIPS, CHAD 44783 6/4/2018 001089 POE ASPHALT PAVING INC. 44784 6/4/2018 003407 RIGHT! SYSTEMS INC 44785 6/4/2018 002520 RWC GROUP 44786 6/4/2018 003133 SHAMROCK MANUFACTURING INC 44787 6/4/2018 002531 SIX ROBBLEES INC 99101 083273/3 140610406001 2862-267782 2862-267995 2862-268038 EXPENSES 45678 45679 45680 45681 45682 SI -156956 75178N 6193 5-819009-1 5-820717 5-826022 Fund/Dept 402.402.000.531 101.042.000.542 001.013.015.515 001.033.000.518 001.033.000.518 001.033.000.518 402.402.000.531 101.042.000.542 101.042.000.542 101.042.000.542 101.042.000.542 101.042.000.542 001.090.099.594 Description/Account Amount SMALL TOOLS/MINOR EQUIP - STC Total : SMALL TOOLS/MINOR EQUIP - STF Total : OFFICE SUPPLIES - LEGAL Total : SUPPLIES FOR #3-502 2005 CHEV` SUPPLIES FOR #3-502 2005 CHEV' SUPPLIES FOR #3-502 2005 CHEV' Total : EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT Total : 2018 STREET MAINTENANCE 2018 STREET MAINTENANCE 2018 STREET MAINTENANCE 2018 STREET MAINTENANCE 2018 STREET MAINTENANCE Total : JUNIPER EX4600 101.000.000.542 SUPPLIES FOR #207 101.042.000.542 101.000.000.542 101.000.000.542 101.000.000.542 COLDMIX 57.88 57.88 54.39 54.39 18.49 18.49 122.22 26.10 -122.22 26.10 14.88 14.88 60,847.46 22,772.89 98,617.99 2,926.00 2,538.14 187,702.48 16,331.51 Total : 16,331.51 Total : 214.68 Total : 1,219.92 214.68 1,219.92 SUPPLIES FOR SNOWPLOWS SUPPLIES FOR SNOWPLOWS SUPPLIES FOR SNOWPLOWS Total : 14.04 -14.04 82.11 82.11 Page: vchlist 06!0412018 9:09:49AM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 44788 6/4/2018 000001 SPOKANE CO TREASURER 44789 6/4/2018 002540 SPOKANE HOUSE OF HOSE INC. 44790 6/412018 000273 SRTC 44791 6/4/2018 000065 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 4423786 5/30/2018 000001 SPOKANE CO TREASURER 32 Vouchers for bank code : apbank 110100204 671373 TS -2051 3377524450 9290201332 Fund/Dept 101.042.000.542 101.000.000.542 101.042.000.542 001.011,000.511 001.016.000.521 Description/Account Amount APRIL 2018 ENGINEERING Total : SMALL TOOLS/MINOR EQUIP - SNC Total : SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE Total : OFFICE SUPPLIES: COUNCIL/CITY Total : LE CONTRACT BILLING MAY 2018 Total : Bank total : 32 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers : 50,679.47 50,679.47 38.02 38.02 2,035.77 2,035.77 365.29 365.29 1,535, 279.00 1,535,279.00 1,899,100.67 1,899,100.67 Page'. vchlist 06/05/2018 3:00:53PM Voucher List Page: Spokane Valley Bank code : pk-ref Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 7636 6/5/2018 006619 AVDEYEVA, TATYANA PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: BROWNS PAR' 75.00 Total : 75.00 7637 6/5/2018 006620 BRANON, CHELSEA PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: VALLEY MISSIC 75.00 Total : 75.00 7638 6/5/2018 006621 CALLAHAN, JUSTIN PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: VALLEY MISSIC 75.00 Total : 75.00 7639 6/5/2018 006622 CUEVAS, ALVARO PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: TERRACE VIEV 75.00 Total : 75.00 7640 6/5/2018 006623 FUNDERBURD, ZONDRA PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 COUNSELOR IN TRAINING OVERP, 5.00 Total : 5.00 7641 6/5/2018 006624 INTERNATIONAL BIBLE CHURCH PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: MIRABEAU ME, 75.00 Total : 75.00 7642 6/5/2018 006625 PALPALATOK, CARLA PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: VALLEY MISSIC 75.00 Total : 75.00 7643 6/5/2018 006626 PARKS, TYLER PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: DISCOVERY PL 75.00 Total : 75.00 7644 6/5/2018 006627 PESKA, AUTUMN PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: MIRABEAU ME, 300.00 Total : 300.00 7645 6/5/2018 006632 SPICE PROGRAM PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: VALLEY MISSIC 75.00 Total : 75.00 7646 6/5/2018 006628 STACK, CHARLES PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: MIRABEAU ME, 75.00 Total : 75.00 7647 6/5/2018 006629 SUN CITY CHURCH PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: BROWNS PARI75.00 Total : 75.00 12 Vouchers for bank code : pk-ref Bank total : 1,055.00 Page: .� id vchlist Voucher List Page: —ice 06106/2018 1:16:31PM Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 6296 6/5/2018 000165 DEPT OF RETIREMENT SYSTEMS Ben80385 001.231.15.00 PERS: PAYMENT 108,687.45 Total : 108,687.45 6298 6/512018 000699 WA COUNCIL CO/CITY EMPLOYEES Ben80387 101.231.21.00 UNION DUES: PAYMENT 2,911.11 Total: 2,911.11 6300 6/5/2018 006345 IDAHO CHILD SUPPORT RECEIPTING Ben80389 001.231.20.00 IDAHO CHILD SUPPORT RECEIPTING: 163.33 Total : 163.33 5306 6/512018 000048 VANTAGE TRANSFER AGENTS, 401A PLAN Ben80391 001.231.14.00 401A: PAYMENT 33,824.54 Total : 33,824.54 6307 6/5/2018 000682 EFTPS Ben80393 001.231.11.00 FEDERAL TAXES: PAYMENT 31,437.77 Total : 31,437.77 6308 6/5/2018 000145 VANTAGEPOINT TRANSFER AGENTS, 457 PL./ Ben80395 001.231.18.00 457 DEFERRED COMPENSATION: PAY/ 8,778.48 Total : 8,778.48 6310 6/5/2018 000162 VANTAGE TRANSFER AGENTS, 401A EXEC PL BenB0397 001.231.14.00 401 EXEC PLAN: PAYMENT 637.50 Total: 637.50 5321 6/5/2018 000562 EFTPS Ben80401 001.231.12.00 FEDERAL TAXES: PAYMENT 1,026.06 Total : 1,026.08 44792 6/5/2018 000120 AWC Ben60383 402.231.16.00 HEALTH PLANS: PAYMENT 129,354.85 Ben80399 001.231.16.00 HEALTH PLANS (COUNCIL): PAYMENT 9,802.85 Total : 139,157.70 9 Vouchers for bank code : apbank Bank total : 326,623.96 9 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers : 326,623.96 Page: vchlist 06/07/2018 3:17:42PM Voucher List Spokane Valley // Page: Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 44793 6/7/2018 000197 ACRANET 44794 6/7/2018 006403 AMERICAN TIRE DISTRIBUTORS INC 44795 6/7/2018 000271 BAINBRIDGE, CHRISTINE 44796 6/7/2018 006631 CONCRETE CUTTERS INC 44797 6/7/2018 001881 DOMRESE, DAN 7200 S108453313 EXPENSES 27369 EXPENSES 44798 6/7/2018 003274 EXCHANGE PUBLISHING LLC 491809 491810 44799 6/7/2018 001447 FREE PRESS PUBLISHING INC 44800 6/7/2018 001253 GORDON THOMAS HONEYWELL 44801 6/7/2018 000917 GRAYBAR 44802 6/7/2018 000321 GREATER SPOKANE INC 44803 6/7/2018 000011 GREATER SPOKANE VALLEY 143533 143554 48669 48690 48693 48695 May 18 1042 9304111258 117716 253.9089.16209 Fund/Dept 001.018.016.518 101.000.000.542 001.013.000.513 001.033.000.518 001.018.014.514 001.013.000.513 001.040.043.558 001.018.013.513 001.018.013.513 001.040.043.558 001.013.000.513 001.040.043.558 001.040.043.558 001.011.000.511 001.090.000.518 001.040.042.558 001.040.042.558 Description/Account Amount EMPLOYEE BACKGROUND CHECI< Total : SUPPLIES: SNOWPLOWS Total : EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT Total : PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Total : EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT Total : LEGAL PUBLICATION LEGAL PUBLICATION DISPLAY ADVERTISING DISPLAY ADVERTISING LEGAL PUBLICATION LEGAL PUBLICATION LEGAL PUBLICATION LEGAL PUBLICATION GOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS Total : Total : 437.00 437.00 77.54 77.54 165.97 165.97 544.00 544.00 807.86 807.86 22.50 58.46 80.96 170.00 170.00 68.00 75.20 68.85 94.35 646.40 4,604.48 Total : 4,604.48 SMALL TOOLS/MINOR EQUIP Total BASE INVESTMENT/PUBLIC INVES Total : 67.56 67.56 3,583.34 3,583.34 BUSINESS CONNECTIONS JUNE 2. 50.00 Page: vchlist 06/07/2018 3:17:42PM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 44803 6/7/2018 000011 000011 GREATER SPOKANE VALLEY (Continued) Total : 50.00 44804 6/7/2018 003297 HIGGINS, LEWIS ROD EXPENSES 001.011.000.511 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 253.59 Total : 253.59 44805 6/7/2018 000421 HOHMAN, JOHN EXPENSES 001.018.013.513 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 33.98 Total : 33.98 44806 6/7/2018 001944 LANCER LTD 0469465 001.040.043.558 BUSINESS CARDS 81.61 0469668 001.090,000.519 BUSINESS CARDS 56.04 Total : 137.65 44807 6/7/2018 000132 MODERN ELECTRIC WATER CO EE -18-020/022 303.303.142.595 CIP 0142 BROADWAY/MULLAN [NT 5,144.29 Total : 5,144.29 44808 6/7/2018 000652 OFFICE DEPOT INC. 147203142001 001.018.014.514 OFFICE SUPPLIES: FINANCE 9.20 Total : 9.20 44809 6/7/2018 000058 OMA A500163 001.018.016.518 EMPLOYEE PHYSICAL EXAMS 900.00 Total : 900.00 44810 6/7/2018 001604 PACIFIC NW PAPER 190201 001.040.041.543 COPY PAPER 118.59 Total: 118.59 44811 6/7/2018 005109 PICTOMETRY INTERNATIONAL CORP US414841 402.402.000.531 PICTOMETRY CONNECT 2,393.60 Total : 2,393.60 44812 6/7/2018 002193 QSCEND TECHNOLOGES INC 9065 001.018.099.594 ONSITE SOFTWARE TRAINING 4,600.00 Total : 4,600.00 44813 6/7/2018 003407 RIGHT! SYSTEMS INC SI -157094 001.090.000.518 IT SUPPORT 6,179.84 Total : 6,179.84 44814 6/7/2018 000031 ROYAL BUSINESS SYSTEMS IN82564 001.040.043.558 MAY 2018 COPIER COSTS 1,341.12 Total : 1,341.12 44815 6/7/2018 004535 SHRED -IT USA LLC 8124682626 001.090.000.518 DOCUMENT DESTRUCTION 156.30 8124888464 001.090.000.518 DOCUMENT DESTRUCTION 156.30 Page: vchlist 06/07/2018 3:17:42PM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: /1,1 -3-- Bank J Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept DescriptionlAccount Amount 44815 6/7/2018 004535 004535 SHRED -IT USA LLC (Continued) Total : 312.60 44816 6/7/2018 000230 SPOKANE CO AUDITORS OFFICE MAY 2018 44817 6/7/2018 000093 SPOKESMAN -REVIEW, THE 44818 6/7/2018 001791 STONE, MIKE 26 Vouchers for bank code : apbank 26 Vouchers in this report I, the undersigned, do certify under penalty of perjury, that the materials have been furnished, the services rendered, or the labor performed as described herein and that the claim is just, due and an unpaid obligation against the City of Spokane Valley, and that I am authorized to authenticate and certify said claim. Finance Director Date Council member reviewed: Mayor Date Council Member Date 496781 497408 EXPENSES 001.040.043.558 RECORDING FEES 001.018.013.513 001.040,042.558 001.076.000.576 Total : ACCT 8001932 ADVERT1SING ACCT 42365 Total : 463.00 463.00 422.60 371.06 793.66 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 494.61 Total: 494.61 Bank total : 34,240.84 Total vouchers : 34,240.84 Page: �� vchlist 06/12/2018 11:46:45AM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: Bank code : Pk -ref Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 7648 6/12/2018 004379 AMERICAN BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SYS PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: ROOM 205 41,65 Total : 41.65 7649 6/12/2018 006633 ANDERSON, SAHARA PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: DISCOVERY Pl. 75.00 Total : 75.00 7650 6/12/2018 006634 BEATTY, HILIARY PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 SUMMER DAY CAMP REFUND 118.00 Total : 118.00 7651 6/12/2018 006635 BOBADILLA, VANESSA PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DANCE CLASS REFUND 95.00 Total : 95.00 7652 6/12/2018 006636 CANALE, ANTOINNETTE PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: DISCOVERY PL 75.00 Total : 75.00 7653 6/12/2018 006649 COBURN, JEFF PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: FIRESIDE LOUI 210.00 Total : 210.00 7654 6/12/2018 006637 FRITZ, CURTIS PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: GREENACRES 75.00 Total : 75.00 7655 6/12/2018 006650 GARRY MIDDLE SCHOOL PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: ROOM 108 52.00 Total : 52.00 7656 6/12/2018 006638 GLANVILLE, CRICKET PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: VALLEY MISSIC 75.00 Total : 75.00 7657 6/12/2018 006651 LYAKHOV, YULIYA PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: GREAT ROOM 500.00 Total : 500.00 7658 6/12/2018 006647 MCQUARRIE, JENNIFER PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 CANCELLATION REFUND - VALLEY 159.00 Total : 159.00 7659 6/12/2018 004682 MIRANDA, CHRISTY PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: MIRABEAU ME, 75.00 Total : 75.00 7660 6/12/2018 006646 MUV FITNESS PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: VALLEY MISSIC 75.00 Page: vchlist 06112/2018 11:46:45AM Voucher List Page: Spokane Valley Bank code : pk-ref Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 7660 6/12/2018 006646 006646 MUV FITNESS (Continued) Total : 75.00 7661 6/12/2018 000895 NEWBILL, BRANDON PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 SUMMER DAY CAMP REFUND 214.00 Total : 214.00 7662 6/12/2018 006639 NIEHUSER, TERESA PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: EDGECLIFF PA 76.00 Total : 76.00 7663 6/12/2018 004270 PRIMAKOVA, DARYA PARKS REFUND 001237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: MIRABEAU MEI 75.00 Total : 75.00 7664 6/12/2018 006640 ROSE, TIA PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: DISCOVERY PL 75.00 Total : 75.00 7665 6/12/2018 006641 SCLERODERMA FOUNDATION PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: MIRABEAU MEI 300.00 Total : 300.00 7666 6/12/2018 006642 SINGLETON, JACKIE PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: DISCOVERY PL 75.00 Total : 75.00 7667 6/12/2018 006643 SIRIANI, TAMI PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: MIRABEAU MEI 75.00 Total : 75.00 7668 6/12/2018 006652 SPOKANE REGIONAL HEALTH DIST. PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: GREAT ROOM 80.00 Total : 80.00 7669 6/12/2018 006644 STOLLEY, MELISSA PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 SUMMER DAY CAMP REFUND 118.00 Total : 118.00 7670 6/12/2018 001452 VALLEY BIBLE CHURCH PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: VALLEY MISSIC 300.00 Total : 300.00 7671 6/12/2018 006630 WARD, SUE PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: MIRABEAU ME. 159.00 Total : 159.00 7672 6/12/2018 006566 WASHINGTON FOOD INDUSTRY ASSN PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 CANCELLATION REFUND: ROOM 2 235.00 Total : 235.00 25 Vouchers for bank code : pk-ref Bank total : 3,407.65 Page: vchlist 06/12/2018 2:30:27PM Voucher List Page: Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 44819 6/12/2018 006143 ACTION DRAIN AND ROOTER WA LLC 328123 001.076.305.575 SERVICE AT CENTERPLACE 261.12 Total : 261.12 44820 6/12/2018 004046 AMERICAN ONSITE SERVICES A-251723 001.076.300.576 PORTABLE RESTROOMS AT PARK; 162.97 Total : 162.97 44821 6/12/2018 006402 ARAMARK UNIFORM & CAREER 1990701098 001.076.305.575 SUPPLIES FOR CENTERPLACE 662.80 1990721654 001.076.305,575 SUPPLIES FOR CENTERPLACE 540.95 1990732010 001.076.305.575 SUPPLIES FOR CENTERPLACE 540.95 Total : 1,744.70 44822 6/12/2018 000326 CONSOLIDATED IRRIGATION #19 May 2018 001.076.300.576 UTILITIES: MAY 2018 CP AND PARI< 970.05 May 2018 402.402.000.531 UTILITIES: MAY 2018 CPW 313.27 Total : 1,283.32 44823 6/12/2018 006618 COUGAR MECHANICAL I-6771 001.076.305.594 AIR CONDITIONING FOR CP #18-0: 8,254.66 Total : 8,254.66 44824 6/12/2018 000823 DEPT OF LABOR & INDUSTRIES 297811 001.076.305.575 BOILER PRESSURE VESSEL INSPE 233.00 Total : 233.00 44825 6/12/2018 000246 EAST SPOKANE WATER DIST #1 April 2018 402.402.000.531 WATER CHARGES: APRIL 2018 2,122.70 Total : 2,122.70 44826 6/12/2018 002308 FINKE, MELISSA May 2018 001.076.301.571 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 45.00 May 2018 001.076.301.571 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 75.00 Total : 120.00 44827 6/12/2018 004813 FIRST CHOICE COFFEE SERVICES 209567 001.076.305.575 COFFEE SVCS FOR CENTERPLAC 129.71 Total : 129.71 44828 6/12/2018 000011 GREATER SPOKANE VALLEY 2nd QTR 2018 001.090.000.550 2ND QTR 2018 ECO DEV GRANT R 4,423.50 Total : 4,423.50 44829 6/12/2018 000070 INLAND POWER & LIGHT CO May 2018 101.042.000.542 UTILITIES: MAY 2018 453.05 Total : 453.05 Page: `tom vchlist 06/12/2018 2:30:27PM Voucher List Spokane Valley /7 Page: Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 44830 6/12/2018 000388 IRVIN WATER DIST. #6 44831 6/12/2018 001635 ISS FACILITY EVENT SERVICES 44832 6/12/2018 001860 PLATT ELECTRIC SUPPLY 44833 44834 44835 44836 44837 6/12/2018 006648 PREMIUM CONTRACTORS 6/12/2018 000415 ROSAUERS FOOD & DRUG CENTER 6/12/2018 000324 SPOKANE CO WATER DIST#3 May 2018 1285788 1286217 1286220 1289963 1289971 1289972 R116264 R356013 BLD -2018-1479 09-1198571 May 2018 6/12/2018 003532 STERICYCLE COMMUNICATION SOLUT 8010794992 6/12/2018 002306 TERRELL LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, MIC 3164 3245 59108687 May 2018 10659620 44838 6/12/2018 001472 TESTAMERICA LABORATORIES 44839 6/12/2018 000167 VERA WATER & POWER 44840 6/12/2018 000066 WCP SOLUTIONS Fund/Dept 001.076.300.576 001.076.305.575 001.076.305.575 001.076.305.575 001.076.305.575 001.076.305.575 001.076.305.575 001.016.016,521 001.076.305.575 001.040.043.322 001.076.301.571 402.402.000.531 001.076.305.575 309.000.271.594 309.000.270.594 001.076.300.576 101.042.000.542 001.076.305.575 Description/Account Amount UTILITIES: PARKS AND CPW MAY Total : EVENT SVCS AT CENTERPLACE EVENT SVCS AT CENTERPLACE EVENT SVCS AT CENTERPLACE MAY 2018 MONTHLY CLEANING AT EVENT SVCS AT CENTERPLACE EVENT SVCS AT CENTERPLACE Total : SUPPLIES FOR PRECINCT SUPPLIES FOR CENTERPLACE Total : PERMIT REFUND: BLD -2018-1479 Total : SUPPLIES FOR REC PROGRAMS Total : WATER CHARGES FOR MAY 2018 Total : ANSWERING SERVICE FOR CENTE Total : 0271 -ENGINEERING & ARCHITECT 0270-ENG/ARCH/PROD MGMT Total : J8536-1 MONTHLY DRINKING WATI Total : UTILITIES: MAY 2018 387.59 387.59 52.68 63.21 26.34 7,849.60 42.14 73.75 8,107.72 69.20 80.02 149.22 147.35 147.35 18.98 18.98 535.93 535.93 39.44 39.44 21,014.10 1,172.65 22,186.75 29.50 29.50 3,647.56 Total : 3,647.56 SUPPLIES FOR CENTERPLACE 685.33 Page: -�� vchlist 06/12/2018 2:30:27PM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: —3------ Bank 3� Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 44840 6/12/2018 000066 WCP SOLUTIONS 44841 6/12/2018 005715 WIDOW'S MIGHT 23 Vouchers for bank code : apbank 23 Vouchers in this report I, the undersigned, do certify under penalty of perjury, that the materials have been furnished, the services rendered, or the labor performed as described herein and that the claim is just, due and an unpaid obligation against the City of Spokane Valley, and that I am authorized to authenticate and certify said claim. Finance Director Date Council member reviewed: Mayor Date Council Member Date (Continued) 10668140 2018 Fund/Dept 001.076.305.575 001.090.000.560 Description/Account Amount SUPPLIES FOR CENTERPLACE Total : 268.19 953.52 2018 SOC SER GRANT REIMBURSI 6,289.51 Total : 6,289.51 Bank total : 61,681.80 Total vouchers : 61,681.80 Page: �� CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: June 19, 2018 Department Director Approval : Item: Check all that apply: ® consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Payroll for Pay Period Ending May 31, 2018 GOVERNING LEGISLATION: PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: BACKGROUND: Budget/Financial impacts: Employees Council Total Gross: $ 285,506.69 $ 5,475.00 $ 290,981.69 Benefits: $ 171,596.61 $ 10,375.23 $ 181,971.84 Total payroll $ 457,103.30 $ 15,850.23 $ 472,953.53 RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to Approve above payroll. [Approved as part of the Consent Agenda, or may be removed and discussed separately.] STAFF CONTACT: Raba Nimri DRAFT MINUTES City of Spokane Valley City Council Regular Meeting Formal Meeting Format Tuesday, May 22, 2018 Mayor Higgins called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. Attendance: Rod Higgins, Mayor Pam Haley, Deputy Mayor Brandi Peetz, Councilmember Linda Thompson, Councilmember Ben Wick, Councilmember Sam Wood, Councilmember Arne Woodard, Councilmember Staff Mark Calhoun, City Manager John Hohman, Deputy City Manager Cary Driskell, City Attorney Erik Lamb, Deputy City Attorney Chelsie Taylor, Finance Director Mike Stone, Parks & Rec Director Mark Werner, Police Chief Mike Basinger, Economic Dev. Manager Adam Jackson, Planning/Grants Engineer Martin Palaniuk, Planner Carrie Koudelka, Deputy City Clerk INVOCATION: Pastor Darrell Cole of Living Hope Community Church gave the invocation. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Council, staff, and the audience stood for the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL: Deputy City Clerk Koudelka called the roll; all Councilmembers were present. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: It was moved by Deputy Mayor Haley, seconded and unanimously agreed to approve the agenda. INTRODUCTION OF SPECIAL GUESTS AND PRESENTATIONS: n/a COMMITTEE, BOARD, LIAISON SUMMARY REPORTS: Councilmember Wood said he attended the Tourism Promotion Area (TPA) board meeting a couple weeks ago, which will donate approximately $2.8M received from hoteliers. He said this year the TPA only received two applications for the funds and they are giving twenty-eight percent to the Sports Commission and seventy-two percent to Visit Spokane. He said he attended the Un -Gala Gala and the Business Showcase at Mirabeau. Councilmember Peetz said she attended the Business Showcase, the Law Enforcement Memorial, and Lemonade Day. Councilmember Woodard acknowledged that the Spokane Association of Realtors recognized Carol Carter and CenterPlace as the Partner of the Year and congratulated Parks staff and director Mike Stone on that achievement. He said he attended Lemonade Day, the Business Showcase, the HCDAC (Housing and Community Development Advisory Committee) meeting, the Family Promise auction, Leadership Northwest, the Spokane Valley Arts Council auction, the Law Enforcement Project, Spokane Homebuilders legislative gathering, and Let Freedom Ring awards for top military. Councilmember Thompson said along with the events already mentioned by other Councilmembers, she attended the River Forum Breakfast where they discussed preserving the aquifer and the river, the Board of Health Education and Communication Committee meeting where they discussed getting all the cities in our region to be Wellness Cities through AWC. She said she also attended the Junior Lilac Parade. Councilmember Wick said he attended the Junior Lilac Parade and he said Spokane Valley had the largest showing in the region. He said he attended the Lilac Queen's luncheon and the Law Enforcement Memorial. He said he volunteered at Bloomsday with Councilmember Peetz, attended Lemonade Day, the Felts Field Minutes Regular Council Meeting: 05-22-2018 Page 1 of 6 Approved by Council: DRAFT strategic planning community group meeting, Spokane Regional Transportation Council executive meeting where they are talking about whether SRTC wants to move into a non-profit status. Deputy Mayor Haley said she attended the Leadership Prayer, Spokane Homebuilders legislative meeting, the Junior Lilac Parade, Lemonade Day, the Lilac Queen's luncheon, the Lilac Gala, two STA (Spokane Transit Authority) board meetings, and the Visit Spokane annual meeting where tourism awards were given. She said Spokane Valley did not fare well in the tourism awards, but CRAVE was nominated. MAYOR'S REPORT: Mayor Higgins said he attended the Chamber Business Showcase, Family Promise, the GSI (Greater Spokane, Inc.) Economic Briefing, the Lilac Parade, the Spokane Valley Arts Council Auction, Chamber of Government Affairs Committee meeting, Felts Field advisory committee meeting, Let Freedom Ring, Homebuilders Association After Hours, the Lilac Queen's luncheon, Lemonade Day, the Torchlight Parade, and the GSI Board meeting. PROCLAMATION: After Mayor Higgins read the proclamation for Older Americans' Month in Spokane Valley, it was received with thanks and appreciation from Ms. Marie Raschko-Sokol from Aging and Long Term Care of Eastern Washington. PUBLIC COMMENTS: After explaining the process and ground rules for giving comments, Mayor Higgins invited general public comments. Bruce and Jen Tucker — Mr. Tucker said he is the general manager of Al Illuminated Sign, and he has a client that would like to change his sign, increasing the size and listing the services provided. He said the business is located between Barker and Hodges on Appleway at the end of the aesthetic corridor. He said he believes the updated sign adds beautification to the area and he would like to propose an administrative exception for the updated sign and an amendment to the code and asked Council to approve the amendment to help this customer thrive in Spokane Valley. Laura Renz, Spokane — said she is with Northwest Service Dog Alliance and she would like to start the process for making Working Dog month or week. She said September is Service Dog month but it does not recognize all working dogs. She said she is starting the steps to begin the month of recognition for working dogs, and she said she is hoping it will be in August. 1. PUBLIC HEARING: 2018 Budget Amendment — Chelsie Taylor Mayor Higgins opened the public hearing at 6:36 p.m. Finance Director Taylor said the hearing is for a 2018 proposed budget amendment, which will effect five funds with total revenue increases of approximately $3.3M and the total expenditures of about $3.8M. She pointed out that page two of the RCA has an error in the table and dialogue box for which she apologized. She said the revenue increase is listed as $3.5M and it should be $3.3M and added that will be corrected for the next reading. Ms. Taylor also pointed out the newly added changes reflecting the generator for City Hall. She then went through the funds and proposed changes as listed in the packet materials and she said assuming this amendment passes the first reading, it will return for a second reading at the May 29 Council meeting. Councilmember Wick asked if the total amount left over from last year was $2.9M and Ms. Taylor confirmed that is correct. Mayor Higgins invited public comment; no comments were offered. Mayor Higgins closed the public hearing at 6:42 p.m. 2. First Reading Ordinance 18-011 Amending 2018 Budget — Chelsie Taylor After Deputy City Clerk Koudelka read the ordinance title, it was moved by Deputy Mayor Haley and seconded to advance Ordinance 18-011 amending the 2018 Budget to a second reading. Finance Director Taylor said this is the first reading of the ordinance amending the 2018 budget. She said it is a companion item to the public hearing just held and it effects five funds. Councilmember Wick said that during the February 13th Council meeting, they discussed a shortfall in the street preservation or maintenance funding and identified a need for $1.8M to maintain the current level of our roads. He said in the past we had a percentage of the end fund balance set aside that went to the City Hall fund. He said he would like an amendment to this amendment that sets aside fifty percent of the end fund balance of $1.5M and direct it to the street fund for the street maintenance program. (While not stated as a motion, Councilmember Peetz seconded and Council discussed Councilmember Wick's proposed amendment to the Budget amendment). Minutes Regular Council Meeting: 05-22-2018 Page 2 of 6 Approved by Council: DRAFT Councilmember Woodard said he thinks it would be short sighted to use what he considers a windfall to try to fund road preservation or maintenance. He said ultimately they will have to come up with a solution to the shortfall, but he said he doesn't think this is plausible. He said the phone tax is down 12.9 percent for the first quarter, and if we bandaid this now, it does not create a long-term method to keep our roads up. City Manager Calhoun said the analysis of street fund 101 mentioned by Councilmember Woodard takes place next week. Deputy Mayor Haley said she agrees it would be a bandaid and she said she is concerned with the railroad crossings that are causing deaths and where funds will come from to fix those crossings if we take money from those projects now. Councilmember Wick said this is half of half of our end balance funds. He said moving $3M to the street 101 fund allows us to have more opportunities and he said there would still be $1M left to allocate to other projects such as parks or grade separation and that every dollar spent now helps save money in the future. He said this is a roll over from two years ago and signs show we have a healthy situation for money. Councilmember Wood said it sounds like sound logic but he would like to see the report when it comes out; he said he thinks it is premature to do this now. City Manager Calhoun said the report next week discusses street fund 101 and will not discuss the street preservation fund at all. Mayor Higgins said street preservation requires dependability and consistency and he said taking funds from this account does not ensure dependability. Vote by show of hands on the amendment by Councilmember Wick: In Favor: Councilmembers Peetz, Thompson and Wick. Opposed: Councilmembers Wood and Woodard, Deputy Mayor Haley and Mayor Higgins. Motion failed. Vote by Acclamation on the motion to advance the 2018 Budget amendment ordinance to a second reading: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed: None. Motion carried. 3. CONSENT AGENDA: Consists of items considered routine which are approved as a group. Any member of Council may ask that an item be removed from the Consent Agenda to be considered separately. Proposed Motion: I move to approve the Consent Agenda. a. Approval of claim vouchers on May 22, 2018 Request for Council Action Form, Total: $3,277,306.32 b. Approval of Payroll for Pay Period Ending May 15, 2018: $331,181.13 c. Approval of May 8, 2018 Council Meeting Minutes, Formal Format It was moved by Deputy Mayor Haley, seconded and unanimously agreed to approve the Consent Agenda. NEW BUSINESS: 4. Motion Consideration: Consolidated Rail Infrastructure Grant — Adam Jackson It was moved by Deputy Mayor Haley and seconded to authorize the City Manager or designee to apply for CRISI Grant funds for the preliminary engineering (PE) phase only of the Pines/BNSF Grade Separation Project. Planning/Grants Engineer Jackson said he gave an administrative report on this topic to Council two weeks ago, and since then the $2.2M PE phase has increased to $2.5M for a couple of reasons but he said ultimately they do not want to underfund the project. He said as they develop the CRISI grant application, they feel the $2.5M will complete the PE phase but, he said as they continue to evaluate and develop the project, it could go back down closer to the $2.2M. He said staff is confident in their application to SRTC that project costs were adequately covered. He said that the flyer they had for their visit to Washington DC had a $27M project cost and that was prepared in April using the best information they had at the time for a projected 2022 Alternative 1 signal price, which he said was the most expensive alternative we have. He said based on recent information, staff did not think we could finish the project by the 2022 date and he said the $29M includes a couple years' worth of inflation and should be enough to cover the project so we are not underfunded with a potential grant award. Mr. Jackson went through the Powerpoint presentation and said the motion consideration is for staff to apply for the CRISI grant that requires a minimum twenty percent match but he recommends the City raise their match to fifty percent which, he said, our funding supports and will better the chances that we get the grant. Mayor Higgins invited comments from the public; no comments were offered. Councilmember Woodard said he likes the idea of raising the City match to fifty percent and he said he thinks it puts us in good standing for the federal grant award. Councilmember Wood said he thinks it is encouraging that we are moving ahead quickly on Pines. Councilmember Thompson asked what percentage of CRISI grants have had a fifty percent match and Mr. Jackson said he does not have that information but staff is advocating maximizing the City's dollars because the grant is very competitive. City Manager Calhoun said the administrative report shows a twenty percent Minutes Regular Council Meeting: 05-22-2018 Page 3 of 6 Approved by Council: DRAFT City match, but now staff is recommending a fifty percent match at $1.25M. It was the consensus of Council to change the City match to fifty percent when applying for the CRISI grant. Vote by Acclamation on the initial motion: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed: None. Motion carried. PUBLIC COMMENTS: After explaining the process and ground rules for giving comments, Mayor Higgins invited general public comments. No comments were offered. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS 5. BUILD Grant Program — Adam Jackson Economic Development Manager Basinger said he wanted to reemphasize the importance of grade separating at the rail crossings and he said he knows it seems aggressive in going after grants for projects but he said he believes the City needs to do this. He said the increase in rail traffic in this corridor will increase travel delays, impact emergency services, commerce and our economic development efforts. He said the probability of being awarded funding through the BUILD program is low but he said we need to continue to stress the importance of grade separating the valley and he said he is confident staff can put together a high quality application. Planning/Grants Engineer Jackson said the BUILD program replaces TIGER and he said the Pines/BNSF grade separation is a good project for this grant and he led Council through the Powerpoint presentation. He said the BUILD grant is three times the funding size that TIGER was last year. Mr. Jackson said the deadline in the packet is incorrect and he said July 19, 2018, is the deadline for the application. He said staff is looking for Council consensus to keep proceeding in the direction they are going to apply for the BUILD grant, and he said they would come back to Council in a few weeks to ask for authorization to apply for the grant. Councilmember Wick asked if staff has heard from other jurisdictions as to what they are applying for and Mr. Jackson said the County is applying for something and SRTC is looking to get a shortlist of the regional projects together, but he has only heard of the one coming from the County. It was consensus of Council to develop the grant application and come back in two to three weeks for a motion consideration. 6. Spokane Valley Youth Voices — Councilmember Thompson Councilmember Thompson brought forward youth presenters from area high schools that she has been meeting with since March and thanked Council for allowing them to speak about issues they would like addressed in the community. Adora Wallgren, Central Valley High School, said with regard to mental illness she would like access to counselors and peer counselors, and she would like crisis numbers provided on the backs of student identification cards. Shelby Menga, Central Valley High School, said her topic of concern is safety: street safety including more sidewalks, snow removal, bike lanes, speeding near schools; personal safety including knowledge of sex offenders near schools and identifying suspicious cars; and school safety. Joseph Zuniga, Central Valley High School, said he would like to see more regulation regarding illegal substances in and around schools and he would like school counselors to do more to address substance abuse and recommend options for help. Deidre Calvo, Central Valley High School, said there could be more security, more supervisors, enforcement on drugs and weapons brought in the schools and more awareness assemblies to discuss drug abuse and mental illness. Christine Dugger, East Valley High School, said she is talking about homelessness and youth employment, and she would like to see more help for parents and students who are homeless and more awareness about what homelessness is. She said she would like to see job advertisement in the schools and assistance for students in the application and interview process. Alexandra Burgess, East Valley High School, said there are many homeless students in her school and she would like to see more help for them to get back on their feet. Mr. Zuniga added that the See Something Say Something campaign at Central Valley covers all these topics and he thinks implementing the campaign in all the schools would help with the morale of the students. Councilmember Thompson said in this first quarter of meetings, thirty-seven youth have discussed these topics and they are looking to see how they can connect with boards and organizations in the community. Minutes Regular Council Meeting: 05-22-2018 Page 4 of 6 Approved by Council: DRAFT She said the next meeting is Monday, June 11, and they will make a plan for small work groups to meet over the summer months and reconvene in the fall. Councilmember Woodard asked if there are peer counselors at Central Valley; and the response was there are not, but they would like to have them. Councilmember Peetz thanked the group for coming and she encouraged them to continue their work. Councilmember Wick asked for a list of the topics they are discussing and a prioritization of the items and what they want to accomplish. Councilmember Thompson said they will do that and provide it to Council. Councilmember Wood said he is impressed with the students, they are articulate, smart and to the point, and he said he hopes they continue as great representatives of their schools. Mayor Higgins called for break at 7:45 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 7:55 p.m. 7. Evaluation of Street and Stormwater Maintenance Programs — John Hohman & Harry Lorick, Consultant Deputy City Manager Hohman introduced Mr. Harry Lorick of LA Consulting to discuss the evaluation of the City's street and stormwater maintenance programs. Mr. Hohman explained that in the past, the City contracted with Spokane County for snow removal services but in 2007 the County notified us that they no longer wanted to provide those services. He said we purchased old snowplows from the state and we have a few in-house employees and contracted drivers to drive the plows. He said we put out an RFQ to evaluate our services and selected LA Consulting. Mr. Lorick said they are just starting the process and he is looking to get comments from Council as to their concerns and areas to look at to improve services. As he went through the Powerpoint presentation, he provided background information on his firm and described the evaluation process moving forward. Councilmember Thompson asked if his firm has any findings from evaluating other agencies that are consistent throughout and Mr. Lorick said not always, but he said they find there are some commonalities among agencies, such as misusing technology. Councilmember Wick asked if they will look at how we do things or what we are doing and Mr. Lorick responded that his team will look at what the City is doing and then look at how to make improvements. Councilmember Wick asked if he has worked with agencies that contract for services as much as Spokane Valley. Mr. Lorick responded that he has and that many cities in southern California are contract cities but, he said, what Spokane Valley does differently is that it uses contracts, County, State, and its own employees to provide services and it uses them together. Councilmember Woodard said he would like to know if we are efficient and best suited to do the snow removal for the City. Councilmember Peetz said comments she has received from the public relate to supervision of crews and she said she would like to see the data that his company provides. Councilmember Wick commented that it seems like we get more complaints when we plow the snow than when we don't, and he would like to know if there is something we can do better. Councilmember Woodard suggested they might look at our small contractors to make sure we are doing things efficiently there. Councilmember Wood asked if they will look into sweeping, such as the priorities and how often they go out to sweep. Mr. Hohman said they will work on compiling a baseline in the next several months and come up with recommendations for Council. 8. Gothmann Property Donation — Cary Driskell, Mike Stone City Attorney Driskell said he and Parks and Recreation Director Stone will discuss the potential property donation by former Councilmember Gothmann of eleven acres located approximately three miles outside the city limits. He said the property has an assessed value of $184,000 and Mr. Gothmann asks that if Council accepts the property donation, the City name the land Myrna Park. Mr. Stone said it is a tremendously generous offer and it is a wonderful natural conservation area, he said it has some physical challenges but added that it is a unique property. He said the City is poor in park acreage and this would add to our Parks Master Plan. While outside the city limits, he said he thinks our residents would use it and years ahead in the future it could be in the center of Spokane Valley so he said he hopes the location does not discourage Council from accepting the donation. Councilmember Peetz said there is a shortage of park property and this would be great for the community. Councilmember Thompson asked about liability if someone gets hurt in the park and Mr. Driskell explained that when landowners open land for recreational purposes, there is recreational immunity so the landowner is not liable under Washington law. Deputy Mayor Haley thanked the Gothmann family for considering donating the land to the City and thinks naming the park Myrna Park is appropriate. Councilmember Woodard said he would like it to remain undeveloped and named Myrna Park. Mr. Driskell said the City Manager has authority to accept the donation and hearing Minutes Regular Council Meeting: 05-22-2018 Page 5 of 6 Approved by Council: DRAFT no objection Mr. Calhoun can proceed in accepting the donation of the land. City Manager Calhoun said with Council consensus to move forward, he will have the City Attorney work with Mr. Gothmann to facilitate the transfer of the property. Councilmembers and staff applauded Mr. Gothmann in a show of appreciation. 9. Code Text Amendment 2018-0002 : Hotel/Motel in Industrial Zone — Marty Palaniuk Planner Palaniuk said the City received a privately initiated code text amendment in February and the Planning Commission held a public hearing on April 26th and then voted last week to forward the amendment to Council for approval. He said this is an amendment to the City's zoning regulations, specifically Title 19, Permitted Use Matrix, and the supplemental use language for lodging. He said it will add an "S" to the supplemental regulations in the industrial zone for hotel/motel uses, specifically to allow hotel/motel use in the industrial area on lots that have frontage on a principal arterial. He said if the building has a footprint greater than 25,000 square feet, it would require a conditional use permit. He said the industrial zone is intended for manufacturing, processing, fabrication and freight handling and the areas that would allow hotel/motel use if the amendment is approved would be Broadway, Sullivan, and Barker Road in the future when it is classified as a principal arterial. He said the Airport Hazard Overlay limits high intensity uses and covers a portion of Broadway Avenue so that would further restrict the hotel/motel use in this area. There was Council Consensus to move forward with the amendment. 10. Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins Deputy Mayor Haley said she would like a report showing options and costs for City -provided electrical inspections in Spokane Valley. Mr. Calhoun said this came up in the agenda committee meeting based on issues that a number of contractors have with the way L & I (Washington State Department of Labor and Industries) conducts electrical inspections. He said the contractors are impressed with the permitting and inspections done by Spokane Valley and would like the City to take over the electrical inspections as well. He said staff will look at what it would take to try to do this, the number of inspections, the number of staff needed to take this on, and the costs. He said it will take time to analyze but staff will look into it and report back to Council. 11. INFORMATION ONLY: The department reports were for information only and were not reported or discussed. CITY MANAGER COMMENTS: City Manager Calhoun said the State of the City address is Wednesday, May 23rd at CenterPlace; the doors open at 7:45 a.m., the speech begins at 8:00 a.m. and concludes at 9:00 a.m. and it is being conducted in partnership with the Spokane Valley Chamber. He said the Budget Workshop will be on June 12 beginning at 8:30 a.m. and there will be no evening meeting that night. Lastly, he said on June 26th Councilmembers are attending the AWC conference so the June 26th Council meeting is also cancelled. It was moved by Deputy Mayor Haley, seconded and unanimously agreed to adjourn. The meeting adjourned at 8:50 p.m. ATTEST: L.R. Higgins, Mayor Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Minutes Regular Council Meeting: 05-22-2018 Page 6 of 6 Approved by Council: DRAFT Attendance: Councilmembers MINUTES SPOKANE VALLEY COUNCIL MEETING STUDY SESSION Spokane Valley City Hall Council Chambers Spokane Valley, Washington May 29, 2018 Staff Rod Higgins, Mayor Pam Haley, Deputy Mayor Brandi Peetz, Councilmember Linda Thompson, Councilmember Ben Wick, Councilmember Sam Wood, Councilmember Arne Woodard, Councilmember Mark Calhoun, City Manager John Hohman, Deputy City Manager Chelsie Taylor, Finance Director Mike Stone, Parks & Rec Director Cary Driskell, City Attorney Erik Lamb, Deputy City Attorney Bill Helbig, City Engineer Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Mayor Higgins called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. ROLL CALL: City Clerk Bainbridge called the roll; all Councilmembers were present. ACTION ITEMS: 1. Second Reading Ordinance 18-011 Amending 2018 Budget — Chelsie Taylor It was moved by Deputy Mayor Haley and seconded to approve Ordinance 18-011 amending Ordinance 17-014 which adopted a budget for the period January 1, 2018 through December 31, 2018. City Clerk Bainbridge then read the ordinance title, followed by a brief explanation of the need for the amendment by Finance Director Chelsie Taylor. Mayor Higgins invited public comment; no comments were offered. Vote by Acclamation: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed: None. Motion carried. 2. Mayoral Appointment: Continuum of Care for the Homeless — Mayor Higgins Mayor Higgins explained about some the functions of the Continuum of Care and of their request for a Spokane Valley Councilmember to sit on their board; and he noted his recommendation for this appointment is Councilmember Woodard as he has similar experience in his association with the HCDAC (Housing and Community Development Advisory Committee). It was then moved by Deputy Mayor Haley and seconded to confirm the Mayoral appointment of Councilmember Woodard to the Continuum of Care Board for a term beginning immediately upon appointment and expiring December 31, 2018. Mayor Higgins invited public comment; no comments were offered. Vote by Acclamation: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed: None. Motion carried. 3. Motion Consideration: Spokane County Interlocal Agreement, Highland Estates Connector — Bill Helbig It was moved by Deputy Mayor Haley and seconded to authorize the City Manager to finalize and execute the interlocal agreement with Spokane County for the reimbursement of costs associated with evaluating the feasibility of the Highland Estates Connector. City Engineer Helbig explained that Spokane County is interested in evaluating the feasibility of a northerly fourth leg for the roundabout that would provide access to the Highland Estates subdivision so that their connection can be evaluated using the City's consultant, DEA; he said the agreement provides reimbursement to us for costs associated with this fourth leg. Mr. Helbig also noted that the preliminary design will be done by us in parallel with work on the grade separation project, and again noted this would be done at no cost to our City. Mayor Higgins invited public comment. Mr. Bob West, Spokane Valley, asked for confirmation that this is not going to cost our city any Council Study Session: 05-29-2018 Page 1 of 5 Approved by Council: DRAFT money, and Mayor Higgins confirmed Mr. West is correct. There were no further comments. Vote by Acclamation: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed: None. Motion carried. NON -ACTION ITEMS: 4. Spokane Airport Projects — Larry Krauter, CEO Spokane Airports Via his PowerPoint, Mr. Larry Krauter, CEO of Spokane Airports, provided an overview of the Spokane Airport projects; he mentioned Felts Field and the Spokane International Airport are actually in a straight line to each other; he spoke of the various runways including the turf runway for the older airplanes; he mentioned some of the improvements and planned projects to Felts Field, including their ramp project, field taxiways and taxi -lanes project, turf runway project, field fuel facility relocation, and their master plan. Mr. Krauter noted the planned historic district gateway study and showed some depictions of possible gateways. At the conclusion of his presentation, Mr. Krauter invited Council, staff and the members of the audience to the free, Felts Field Neighbor Day event which will be this Saturday from 9-4. Mr. Krauter also extended compliments to City staff for their professionalism and helpfulness, and thanked Council for the opportunity to present. 5. Arts in Public Spaces — Cary Driskell, Mike Stone City Attorney Driskell explained that the Spokane Valley Arts Council (SVAC) was formed in 2004, is a separate entity from the City, is a nonprofit organization, and that Spokane Valley and the Arts Council have had a valued relationship. Mr. Driskell stated that the SVAC has conducted fundraisers to help fund purchases of public art, and several of those art pieces are now publicly displayed in the City, particularly around City Hall. Mr. Driskell noted that a new sculpture, "Heart of the Valley" is nearly complete but we do not have specifics on exactly when the project will be completed, how large it will be, or a suitable location for the piece; so one question for Council to consider is, where should this new piece be sited; he noted that to keep in line with our recently adopted policy for acceptance of donations and gifts, this and other aspects associated with art pieces should be discussed, and he noted that one of tonight's discussion points deals with an agreement to memorialize the donations, where the art will be placed, and to make sure we incorporate all aspects of these art pieces, including maintenance costs, etc., into a contract in order to alleviate the possibility of miscommunications. Mr. Driskell asked Council if they are interested in approaching the Arts Council to discuss an agreement of this type. City Attorney Driskell noted that staff will come back at a future meeting to present the analysis to Council on costs to the City in accepting this sculpture, whether the piece will require lighting, and to discuss possible locations. He also noted the City has not budgeted for any of these costs because we did not have this information during last year's budget process. Mr. Driskell and Mr. Stone also discussed the possibility of drafting and adopting a master plan to guide Council in issues relating to public art. Mr. Driskell asked if there is Council consensus for staff to proceed with the above-mentioned approach. There was some discussion about the Arts Council and who sits on that Board; and it was mentioned that a former Councilmember was (and likely still is) a member of that board. Mr. Stone added that there could also be others who might be interested in art, such as collectors, artists, or others who work to advance art in our community, and it would be beneficial to have a written agreement, as well as an arts master plan. Councilmember Woodard noted that having a plan is a great start, not just to achieve goals but also in applying for grants; and it would give the public opportunity for input; and said he agrees a written contract is a good idea. There was Council consensus to proceed with an agreement with the Arts Council, and to continue working on an arts master plan. City Manager Calhoun mentioned that such an agreement will help the Council and the community preserve a long-standing relationship with the Arts Council and with Dr. Harkin; he said the Arts Council is interested in continuing to use CenterPlace for their fundraising event in exchange for periodic donations, adding that it is important for Council to have a say early in the process of where such art would be placed, as well as having an opportunity to discuss whether to accept each piece. Council concurred. Mayor Higgins mentioned the idea of having Council representation on their Board, and Mr. Calhoun said we could possibly build that into the agreement. Council Study Session: 05-29-2018 Page 2 of 5 Approved by Council: DRAFT 6. Street O&M Fund #101 Level of Service and Financial Challenges — Chelsie Taylor, Erik Lamb, John Hohman Deputy City Manager Hohman explained that tonight's agenda item is in follow-up to numerous discussions since 2004, concerning street preservation and maintenance and how to fund those activities; and that street fund 101 has some challenges which will impact the 2019 budget preparation. Via his PowerPoint presentation ,Mr. Hohman noted that Fund 101, Street O&M, gets its funding from gas and phone tax, and the proceeds are used for street patching, crack sealing, snow plowing, and other street operation and maintenance activities. He mentioned a past attempt in 2004 for Council to pass a utility tax ordinance, but that it did not advance; he noted the 6% telephone utility tax ordinance was approved by Council in 2008 and went into effect in 2009, and that tax is applied to land lines and the voice portion of cell phones, but that those tax collections have declined since implementation. Mr. Hohman noted that the immediate need is determine whether to add additional 2019 revenues for Street O&M Fund 101; and if no additional revenues are to be added, services will need to be cut to stay within current revenue constraints. Finance Director Taylor gave further details about Street O&M Fund 101; she mentioned this fund generally accounts for the operations and maintenance of our streets and as mentioned, includes street pavement repairs, but also traffic signals, signs, landscaping and vegetation control; that the adopted 2018 budget has recurring expenditures of about $4.587 million, but that identified needs at last year's budget workshop were approximately $4.826 million, which led to a decision about reducing recurring expenditures due to revenue constraints. Finance Director Taylor went over some of those expenditures, which included such things as $1.5 million for pothole patching, repairs and other maintenance, and also included about one million for pavement preservation. She noted other expenditures such as traffic operations and maintenance, street lighting and sweeping, fleet maintenance, snow maintenance; as well as estimated revenue sources, all as included on slides 7 and 8 of the PowerPoint. Director Taylor also showed some charts depicting the motor vehicle fuel tax collections over the years as well as the percentages of decrease and increase, the declining telephone utility tax revenues over the years as well as those percentages of decrease and increase, and she noted that we anticipate the telephone utility tax to continue declining, but are uncertain when those revenues will bottom out. As noted on slide 14, Deputy City Manager Hohman explained some of the challenges in this street O&M fund and of our attempts to provide recommendations to improve efficiency and cost effectiveness; and the slide also showed projected revenues, expenditures and deficits for years 2020-2023, which culminated in projected funding needs of between $1.3 and $1.8 million over those years. Deputy City Attorney Lamb then explained about the revenue options, and that recurring revenues must be at least equal to recurring expenditures to finance current service levels. The revenue options Mr. Lamb explained about included a Transportation Benefit District, or TBD, property tax banked capacity, a levy lid lift, and a utility tax, all as noted on the PowerPoint slides. In conclusion, Mr. Hohman said our street fund 101 needs a new revenue source for 2019, or historic service levels would need to be reduced by $741,000 for 2019. Mr. Hohman noted that this issue needs public input and discussion; that we can look at new revenue sources, or Council could direct us to scale back some of those operations. Mr. Hohman also noted that back in February we talked about fund 101 and pavement preservation 311, but he feels the immediate need is to focus on 101, even though we are reviewing the needs of 311 and the amount of money needed to keep that preservation at its current level; he said staff is looking for an additional consultant to double-check what we've done to make sure that number is as accurate as it can be; he said there are several issues staff are working with including working through the bottleneck of construction projects, and said staff realizes Council might want to look at some residential streets and what kind of treatment would be best; adding that this will be a continuing and ongoing discussion as more information is developed. Council discussion included comment from Councilmember Peetz that she wants to keep our good roads, but would not be in favor of a utility tax as citizens are already struggling financially; said she feels there Council Study Session: 05-29-2018 Page 3 of 5 Approved by Council: DRAFT should be more public input on this, or even put it to a vote; adding that there is a lot of information concerning a TBD, and perhaps we could have more discussion and detail on that option. Councilmember Wood mentioned that there was no discussion on the PCI index or discussion about what level of roads we would maintain, and Mr. Calhoun noted that the focus tonight is street fund 101; that fund 311 is pavement preservation, and that those issues are for a different discussion later. Councilmember Haley stressed again that the telephone utility tax is on land lines and only on the voice portion of a cell phone and does not include data. Mr. Calhoun said that we are not trying to answer anything tonight, but merely trying to get a bit ahead of the June 12 budget workshop where all this will be discussed more; that this is a big topic requiring a big decision and that the 2019 budget is the budget where this comes home to roost and that we must find more revenue or cut $740,000 of existing service levels, adding that we will need a decision by late summer or early fall on how best to proceed. Councilmember Woodard said he has seen this coming for years and we are now at that uncomfortable position and he hopes that Council will take this seriously and not rule out anything, but have a good discussion June 12 to set staff on the direction of what needs to be done. 7. Economic Analysis of Tourism Related Venues & Events — Chelsie Taylor Finance Director Taylor explained that as shown in the spreadsheet, staff have prepared an analysis of the economic impact of ten potential tourism enhancement projects. After Director Taylor went over the information in the RCA and the spreadsheet, Mr. Woodard asked if this too will be discussed at the June 12 budget workshop. Mr. Calhoun replied that it will not as that June 12 agenda will be full enough as we will go through the line -item funds, and the "bigger picture" types of projects for that afternoon; that for tonight, he said we are not seeking a decision from Council on which projects to include and of how to narrow down this list of ten projects; he said some of those items are in the northeast area that could generate 150+ family wage jobs, while some of the other projects would be minimum wage, part-time jobs which are not really economic development projects; he said the reality is none of these projects will make money; the CenterPlace project could "pencil out" and the Fairgrounds project could get started as the land is reasonably close and there is no land acquisition needed, and the County would operate it rather than us; adding that most of these projects pertain to bringing in tourists during the sunny, warmer months, while the Fairgrounds is geared more toward other seasons. Discussion ensued about the Browns Park improvements and the sand volleyball courts as well as the masterplan; with Mr. Calhoun mentioning that lighting for Browns Park went out to bid and we received two bids, each over $300,000, which is substantially greater than what we have budgeted; and said that will be discussed at the workshop. Councilmember Wick asked about the extra lodging tax money and about using that to purchase land somewhere, and perhaps to do that in phases instead of having a bond payment. Mr. Calhoun said if you don't have a bond consideration, and are simply looking at operations, that is a different discussion. Mr. Calhoun said that he and Ms. Taylor want to bring this topic back again so Council can come up with ideas of what to do, and that it would be the City making requests of the LTAC (Lodging Tax Advisory Committee) and then having that committee appropriate funds to us or not. Mr. Calhoun noted that this topic will come again to Council in July so that perhaps Council can start narrowing down the list to perhaps two or three projects. Council concurred, and Ms. Taylor said that time would also work nicely with the agenda topic of Council goals for the LTAC. 8. Splashdown Contract - Cary Driskell City Attorney Driskell gave a history of the Splashdown lease agreement, as noted in his May 29, 2018 Request for Council Action form; he added that the Bleasners are here tonight with their attorney Mr. Montgomery; he stated that the Bleasners are interested in taking over the ownership of Splashdown and are interested in executing a lease agreement. Mr. Driskell then went through the essential terms of the agreement, and stated that if Council is interested in a longer term, to please let him know as the Bleasners would also prefer a longer agreement as it helps with financing and stability. Mr. Driskell noted that the Bleasners' desire is to open the weekend of June 8, and if Council agrees with the terms of this agreement, Council Study Session: 05-29-2018 Page 4 of 5 Approved by Council: DRAFT it will be brought back at next week's Council meeting for a motion consideration. There was Council consensus to go forward with a five-year lease and a five-year extension. Mr. Driskell said he will speak with the owners before the next Council meeting, and if there are any differences, he will let Council know, adding that it has been a very amicable discussion with the Bleasner's attorney Mr. Montgomery. 9. Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins There were no suggested changes to the Advance Agenda. 10. Police Department Monthly Report This item was for information only and was not reported or discussed. 11. Council Check-in — Mayor Higgins Councilmember Woodard mentioned that someone approached him about our permitting process and our planning department, and said that gentleman reported that he has never had a project go so smoothly as what was done here, and that's he's telling people what a business -friendly city we are; and also extended compliments to Micki Harnois and some of the engineers assisting with his project. 12. City Manager Comments — Mark Calhoun City Manager Calhoun reminded everyone that the budget workshop will be held in this room June 12, from 8:30 a.m. to about 3:30 p.m., and that there will be no evening meeting that night; he also reminded everyone that the June 26 Council meeting will be cancelled as the majority of Councilmembers attend the AWC (Association of Washington Cities) conference in Yakima. Concerning the budget workshop, Mr. Calhoun said we will be setting up a finance committee meeting sometime next week. It was moved by Deputy Mayor Haley, seconded and unanimously agreed to adjourn. The meeting adjourned at 8:08 p.m. ATTEST: L.R. Higgins, Mayor Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Council Study Session: 05-29-2018 Page 5 of 5 Approved by Council: DRAFT Attendance: Councilmembers MINUTES SPOKANE VALLEY COUNCIL MEETING STUDY SESSION Spokane Valley City Hall Council Chambers Spokane Valley, Washington June 5, 2018 Staff Rod Higgins, Mayor Pam Haley, Deputy Mayor Brandi Peetz, Councilmember Linda Thompson, Councilmember Ben Wick, Councilmember Sam Wood, Councilmember Arne Woodard, Councilmember Mark Calhoun, City Manager John Hohman, Deputy City Manager Chelsie Taylor, Finance Director Mike Stone, Parks & Rec Director Cary Driskell, City Attorney Erik Lamb, Deputy City Attorney Bill Helbig, City Engineer Gloria Mantz, Engineer Manager Rachelle McFetridge, Attorney Nicole Montano, Code Enforcement Officer Greg Baldwin, Dev. Services Coordinator Adam Jackson, Planning/Grants Engineer Erica Amsden, Project Manager Colin Quinn -Hurst, Sr. Transportation Planner Marty Palaniuk, Planner Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Mayor Higgins called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. ROLL CALL: City Clerk Bainbridge called the roll; all Councilmembers were present. ACTION ITEMS: 1. PUBLIC HEARING: Proposed 2019-2024 Six Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) — Colin Quinn -Hurst Mayor Higgins opened the public hearing at 6:02 p.m. Mr. Quinn -Hurst explained the purpose of the TIP, and briefly went over some of the more predominant projects, after which Mayor Higgins invited public comment. No comments were offered and Mayor Higgins closed the public hearing at 6:10 p.m. 2. Resolution 18-003 Adopting 2019-2024 Six Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) — Colin Quinn Hurst It was moved by Deputy Mayor Haley and seconded to approve Resolution 18-003, adopting the 2019-2024 Six Year TIP as presented. Vote by Acclamation: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed: None Motion carried. 3. CONSENT AGENDA: consists of items considered routine which are approved as a group. Any member of Council may ask that an item be removed from the Consent Agenda to be considered separately. Proposed Motion: I move to approve the Consent Agenda. a. Approval of claim vouchers on June 5, 2018 Request for Council Action Form Total: $305,682.71 b. Approval of May 15, 2018 Council Meeting Minutes, Study Session It was moved by Deputy Mayor Haley, seconded and unanimously agreed to approve the Consent Agenda. Council Study Session: 05-29-2018 Page 1 of 4 Approved by Council: DRAFT 4. First Reading Proposed Ordinance 18-012, Code Text Amendment, Hotel/Motel in Industrial Zone - Marty Palaniuk After City Clerk Bainbridge read the title of the ordinance, it was moved by Deputy Mayor Haley and seconded to advance Ordinance 18-012 amending zoning regulations, to a second reading. Mr. Palaniuk briefly explained this privately initiated amendment as noted in the RCA. Mayor Higgins invited public comment; no comments were offered. Vote by Acclamation: In Favor: Mayor Higgins, Deputy Mayor Haley, and Councilmembers Thompson, Woodard, Peetz, and Wood. Opposed: Councilmember Wick. Motion carried. 5. Motion Consideration: BUILD Grant — Adam Jackson It was moved by Deputy Mayor Haley and seconded to authorize the City Manager or designee to apply for BUILD funds for all phases of the Pines Road/BNSF GSP (grade separation project). After Mr. Jackson went through his PowerPoint presentation explaining about this grant opportunity, City Manager Calhoun noted that perhaps Mr. Jackson could draft a list of agencies from whom we could seek letters of support, and deliver those to Councilmembers who could advocate for this grant on our behalf. Mr. Jackson said he would get that started after tonight's meeting. Mayor Higgins invited public comment; no comments were offered. Vote by Acclamation: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed: None. Motion carried. 6. Motion Consideration: Splashdown Contract — Cary Driskell It was moved by Deputy Mayor Haley and seconded to authorize the City Manager to finalize and execute the Lease Agreement with 'New Splash -Down Concessions, Inc., ' for use of a portion of Valley Mission Park, and any related documents to accomplish the same. City Attorney Driskell mentioned the formerly proposed ending lease period would put the termination right before the beginning of the season, and said he therefore proposes a 67 month initial lease which would end at the end of December; and then have a second optional five-year period beyond that. Council concurred. Mayor Higgins invited public comment. Mr. John Montgomery, Spokane- said he is the attorney for the New Splash -Down, which has been an evolving corporation; said the Bleasners were the original owners, and that the site was originally an old - gravel pit and an old dump pit; and that they opened their facility in 1983, which at the time was the state- of-the-art facility and very popular with young children and young families; said the Bleasners have poured their hearts into this trying to make it a successful enterprise for the community. There were no other comments. Vote by Acclamation: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed: None. Motion carried. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Mayor Higgins explained the process, and then invited public comments. Mr. Keith Harger, Spokane Valley: regarding the City's street sweepers, said they don't do Mission at all and he was wondering why; said he runs and bikes on that street and they don't ever sweep it; said he has seen the sweepers up and down Pierce three times, but they continue to refuse to do Mission, and he would like it swept. Mr. Calhoun said staff will follow-up with AAA Sweeping to get a sense of where Mission is on their schedule of streets to sweep. Ms. Nina Fluegal, Spokane Valley: mentioned the idea of security for our building, and via the Clerk, distributed copies to Councilmembers of her handout of "Smarter, Safer, More Sustainable Buildings and Cities" from Johnson Controls, with James (Jim) Fluegal listed as District Sales Manager. She also mentioned the condition of the Appleway Trail and the amount of weeds; said we need to maintain the existing sections, that the weeds are numerous and high; said people are also writing on benches and there is trash everywhere, and that it is a waste and a shame. There were no further public comments. City Attorney Driskell said we are aware of the Trail situation and there was an initial difficulty in getting the needed work taken care of, but this should be resolved fairly soon. NON -ACTION ITEMS: 7. Retail Recruitment Plan — Chaz Bates Prior to the meeting, as part of the Amended Agenda, this item was removed from the agenda. Council Study Session: 05-29-2018 Page 2 of 4 Approved by Council: DRAFT 8. Sullivan and Wellesley Intersection Improvement Project — Erica Amsden, Gloria Mantz Engineering Manager Mantz introduced Project Manager Amsden, and Welch -Comer Senior Project Manager Mr. Matthew Gillis who is working on the design of this project. Ms. Mantz explained some of the existing conditions of the project, as well as some points of Spokane County's future project; and the project background and budget. Ms. Amsden explained about the design options of a traffic signal or a two- lane roundabout, after which as noted in the PowerPoint slides, said that staff recommends the traffic signal. Ms. Mantz said concerns were raised by members of the public, mostly about traffic near the schools and inexperienced drivers trying to navigate a roundabout; Ms. Mantz noted in this area, there will likely always be a lot of inexperienced drivers. It was noted the speed limit area will be a school zone. Ms. Amsden explained that outside this specific project, it is a County project, and we would just be working to improve the intersection. There was Council discussion concerning the amount of traffic and the proximity to the schools, with some members of Council expressing their preference for a traffic signal. There was consensus from Council to move this forward to the July 3 Council meeting for Council to determine their preferred design alternative. 9. Code Enforcement Update — Rachelle McFetridge, Nicole Montano, Greg Baldwin After Attorney McFetridge introduced Code Enforcement Officer Montano and Development Services Coordinator Baldwin, Ms. McFetridge started the PowerPoint presentation by explaining some of the duties of each of the three staff members, as well as some of the current and past code enforcement cases; she stressed the goal is voluntary compliance and staff works with the property owner with that goal in mind. City Attorney Driskell said this team works very well together and as they work on these issues, Ms. McFetridge and Ms. Montano work to refine the process; he said they inherited a large number of cases, some of which were very old; that they are still working on the backlog of cases but making good progress. Mayor Higgins mentioned shipping containers on the property around 9th on the NE corner near Evergreen; and Ms. Montano said she will investigate that concern. 10. Hearing Examiner Services — Cary Driskell After City Attorney Driskell explained the current issue with the services of the hearing examiner, as noted in his June 5, 2018 Request for Council Action, he ended his explanation with his suggestion to terminate the contract with the County by giving six months' notice, after which staff will issue an RFP (Request for Proposals) and gather options for service elsewhere. There was Council consensus to bring this back in two weeks for such a motion consideration. 11. Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins There were no suggested changes to the Advance Agenda. 12. Council Check-in — Mayor Higgins Councilmember Woodard mentioned that SRTC (Spokane Regional Transportation Council) and the Chamber of Commerce will be sponsoring a Roundabout Conversation event scheduled for tomorrow from 6-8 pm at CenterPlace. Mayor Higgins and Mr. Calhoun referenced the Library's Business in the Park event, Saturday, June 16, from 10 am to 6 pm, which will be held on the Library's property across from City Hall. 13. City Manager Comments — Mark Calhoun Concerning tomorrow's SRTC sponsored event concerning roundabouts, Mr. Calhoun said the event will be held from 6-8 pm, with a Q&A opportunity at the end; on the same topic tomorrow from 9-12 there will be a workshop for engineers and planners, and from 5-6 there will be a reception for elected officials with an opportunity for elected officials to meet the panel members. Mr. Calhoun again reminded everyone of the cancelled Council evening meetings on June 12 and 26th, and of the special budget workshop meeting June 12, beginning at 8:30 a.m. here in Council chambers. Council Study Session: 05-29-2018 Page 3 of 4 Approved by Council: DRAFT 14. Executive Session: [RCW 42.30.110(1)(b)] Potential Land Acquisition It was moved by Deputy Mayor Haley, seconded and unanimously agreed to adjourn into executive session for approximately 15 minutes to discuss potential land acquisition, and that no action is planned upon return to open session. Council adjourned into executive session at 7:46 p.m. At 8:04 p.m. Mayor Higgins declared Council out of executive session, at which time it was moved by Deputy Mayor Haley, seconded and unanimously agreed to adjourn. ATTEST: L.R. Higgins, Mayor Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Council Study Session: 05-29-2018 Page 4 of 4 Approved by Council: CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: June 19, 2018 Department Director Approval: El Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ® new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Second Reading Proposed Ordinance 18-012 amending SVMC 19.60.050 and SVMC 19.65.080, Hotels/Motels in Industrial Zone GOVERNING LEGISLATION: SVMC 17.80.150; 19.30.040; and RCW 36.70A.106 PREVIOUS ACTION TAKEN: Administrative Report May 22, 2018, First Reading June 5, 2018 BACKGROUND: CTA 2018-0002 is a privately -initiated code text amendment to amend chapters 19.60 and 19.65 SVMC to outright permit hotels/motels in the Industrial (I) zoning district with a building footprint up to 25,000 square feet, and to permit a hotels/motels with a footprint greater than 25,000 square feet subject to a Conditional Use Permit (CUP). SVMC 19.60.050 Permitted Use Matrix identifies the uses that are permitted in each of the zoning districts. The applicant has requested an amendment to the matrix which will permit hotel/motel uses in the "I" zoning district with the application of supplemental use regulations described in SVMC 19.65.080. On June 5, 2018 the City Council passed a motion to advance Ordinance 18-012 to a second reading. OPTIONS: Move to approve Ordinance 18-012 with or without further amendments; or take other action deemed appropriate. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to approve Ordinance 18-012 amending chapters 19.60.050 and 19.65.080 SVMC to allow hotels/motels in the Industrial zoning district. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: N/A STAFF CONTACT: Martin Palaniuk, Planner ATTACHMENTS: A. Draft Ordinance 18-012 B. Planning Commission's Findings and Recommendations C. Proposed amendment to SVMC 19.60 and 19.65.080 D. PC Meeting Minutes 4/12/2018 E. PC Meeting Minutes 4/24/2018 F. PC Meeting Minutes 05/10/2018 G. Staff Report CTA -2018-0002 CTA -2018-0002 RCA for 2nd Ordinance Reading page 1 DRAFT CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 18-012 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON AMENDING SPOKANE VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 19.60 RELATED TO USES PERMITTED IN THE INDUSTRIAL ZONE, AND SPOKANE VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 19.65 RELATED TO LODGING IN THE INDUSTRIAL ZONE, AND OTHER MATTERS RELATING THERETO. WHEREAS, the City of Spokane Valley (City) previously adopted Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) Title 19, relating to zoning regulations, and has made subsequent amendments from time - to -time as appropriate; and WHEREAS, such regulations are authorized by RCW 36.70A; and WHEREAS, on April 6 and 13, 2018, notice of the Planning Commission public hearing was published in the Valley News Herald; and WHEREAS, on April 12, 2018, the Planning Commission held a study session relating to proposed amendments to chapters 19.60 and 19.65 SVMC relating to siting hotel/motel uses in Industrially -zoned areas; and WHEREAS, on April 26, 2018, the Planning Commission held a public hearing, received evidence, information, public testimony, and a staff report with a recommendation followed by deliberations; and WHEREAS, on May 10, 2018, the Planning Commission approved the findings and recommended that City Council adopt the amendments; and WHEREAS, on May 22, 2018, City Council reviewed the proposed amendments, Planning Commission findings, and Planning Commission recommendation. City Council determined it desired to consider adopting the amendments; and WHEREAS, on May 23, 2018, the Washington State Department of Commerce was notified pursuant to RCW 36.70A.106.3.b, providing a notice of intent to adopt amendments to Spokane Valley development regulations; and WHEREAS, the amendment set forth below is consistent with the goals and policies of the City's Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, SVMC 19.60 and 19.65, as amended, bears a substantial relationship to the public health, safety, welfare and protection of the environment. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley ordains as follows: Section 1. Purpose. The purpose of this Ordinance is to amend chapter 19.60 SVMC, Permitted Uses to allow the hotel/motel use in the industrial (I) zoning district subject to supplemental use regulations; and to amend chapter 19.65 SVMC adding supplemental use regulations for the hotel/motel use in the I zoning district. Ordinance 18-012 Page 1 of 4 DRAFT Section 2. Findings and Conclusions. The City Council acknowledges that the Planning Commission conducted appropriate investigation and study, held a public hearing on the proposed amendments and recommends approval of the amendments. The City Council has read and considered the Planning Commission's findings. The City Council hereby makes the following findings: A. Growth Management Act Policies - Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA) provides that each city shall adopt a comprehensive land use plan and development regulations that are consistent with and implement the comprehensive plan. B. City of Spokane Valley Goals and Policies - The City of Spokane Valley has adopted goals and policies consistent with the GMA and adopted County -Wide Planning Policies, set forth below. Goal ED -G1: Support economic opportunities and employment growth for Spokane Valley. Goal ED -G4: Collaborate with relevant economic development stakeholders, including the business community, to grow a strong and healthy regional economy. Goal ED -G5: Support and encourage the development of a strong workforce that is globally competitive and responds to the changing needs of the workplace. Goal ED -G6: Maintain a positive business climate that strives for flexibility, predictability and stability. Goal LU -G3: Support the transformation of commercial, industrial, and mixed — use areas into accessible districts that attract economic activity. Goal LU -G4: Ensure that land use plans, regulations, review processes, and infrastructure improvements support economic growth and vitality. Goal LU -P12: Maintain a robust supply of productive industrial land. C. Conclusions The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment. The proposed City -initiated Code text amendments are consistent with the City's adopted Comprehensive Plan and the approval criteria pursuant to SVMC 17.80.150(F). Ordinance 18-012 Page 2 of 4 DRAFT Section 3. Amendment. SVMC 19.60.050 is hereby amended as follows: Ordinance 18-012 Page 3 of 4 Residential Mixed Use Commercia 1 Industrial Parks and Open Space R-1 R-2 R-3 MFR MU CMU NC RC IMU I POS Agriculture and Animal Animal processing/handling P Animal raising and/or keeping S S S S S S Animal shelter S P P Beekeeping, commercial P Beekeeping, hobby S S S Community garden S S S S S S S Greenhouse/nursery, commercial P P P Kennel S S S S P P Orchard, tree farming, commercial P P Riding stable P P C Lodging Bed and breakfast PPPP P Hotel/motel P P P P S Recreational vehicle park/campground S Ordinance 18-012 Page 3 of 4 DRAFT Section 4. Amendment. SVMC 19.65.080 is hereby amended as follows: 19.65.080 Lodging A. Recreation Vehicle Park/Campground 1. The maximum net units per acre shall be 15; 2. Recreational vehicle stalls shall average 1,500 square feet; 3. Accessory uses including management headquarters, recreational facilities, restrooms, dumping stations, showers, laundry facilities, and other uses and structures customarily incidental to operation of a recreational vehicle park are permitted as accessory uses. 4. A minimum of 15 percent of the gross site shall be set aside and developed as common use areas for open or enclosed recreational facilities. Recreational vehicle stalls, private streets, storage, utility sites, and off-street parking areas shall not be counted as meeting this requirement; and 5. The recreational vehicle park shall meet all Spokane Regional Health District and City regulations regarding sewage and water. B. Hotel/Motel in Industrial Zone: A hotel/motel use is allowed in the "I" zoning district on sites with frontage on a Principal Arterial. If the proposed hotel/motel use has a building footprint greater than 25,000 square feet, a conditional use permit pursuant to 19.150 SVMC is required. Section 5. Other sections unchanged. All other provisions of Title 19 SVMC not specifically referenced hereto shall remain in full force and effect. Section 6. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance shall be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause, or phrase of this Ordinance. Section 7. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect five days after publication of this Ordinance or a summary thereof in the official newspaper of the City of Spokane Valley as provided by law. Passed by the City Council this day of June, 2018. ATTEST: L.R. Higgins, Mayor Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Approved as to form: Office of the City Attorney Date of Publication: Effective Date: Ordinance 18-012 Page 4 of 4 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE SPOKANE VALLEY PLANNING COMMISSION CTA -2018-0002 —Proposed Amendment to Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) Pursuant to SVMC 17,80.150 (E) the Planning Commission shall consider the proposal and shall prepare and forward a recommendation to the City Council following the public hearing. The following findings are consistent with the Planning Commission recommendation that City Council adopt the amendment. Background: 1. Pursuant to RCW 36.70A.130, Spokane Valley adopted its 2016 Comprehensive Plan Update and updated development regulations on December 13, 2016, with December 28, 2016 as the effective date. 2. CTA -2018-0002 is a privately initiated code text amendment to SVMC 19.60.050 and SVMC 19.65.080 to allow a hotel/motel in the Industrial zone on sites with frontage on a principal arterial subject to a conditional use permit (CUP) only if the building footprint exceeds 25,000 square feet. Staff provided alternative proposed amendment language that is more congruent with the language and organization of the SVMC, but that is substantively the same. 3. The Planning Commission held a properly noticed public hearing and conducted deliberations on April 26, 2018. The Commissioners voted 5-2 to recommend that the City Council adopt the amendment using the alternative language proposed by staff. Planning Commission Findings: 1. Recommended Modifications The Planning Commission recommended approval of the proposed amendments as revised by staff and attached in Exhibit 1. 2. Compliance with SVMC 17.80.150(F) Approval Criteria a. The proposed text amendment is consistent with the applicable provisions of the Comprehensive Plan: Findings: Goal ED -G1: Support economic opportunities and employment growth for Spokane Valley. Goal ED -G4: Collaborate with relevant economic development stakeholders, including the business community, to grow a strong and healthy regional economy; Goal ED -G5: Support and encourage the development of a strong workforce that is globally competitive and responds to the changing needs of the workplace. Goal ED -G6: Maintain a positive business climate that strives for flexibility, predictability and stability. Goal LU -G3: Support the transformation of commercial, industrial, and mixed —use areas into accessible districts that attract economic activity; Goal LU -G4: Ensure that land use plans, regulations, review processes, and infrastructure improvements support economic growth and vitality. Goal LU -P12: Maintain a robust supply of productive industrial land. Findings and Recommendations of the Spokane Valley Planning Commission CTA -2018-0002 Page 1 of 2 b. The proposed amendment bears a substantial relation to public health, safety, welfare and protection of the environment. Findings: The amendment bears substantial relation to public health, safety, welfare and protection os the environment. The hotel/motel use in close proximity to the job locations in the industrial area adds a level of convenience that is currently not available to the people who travel to the area and spend the preponderance of their time working in the industrial area. Additionally the hotel/motel use provides a positive economic impact to businesses in the area and to the citizens of Spokane Valley. 3. Conclusion: The proposed text amendment is consistent with Comprehensive Plan and bears a substantial relation to public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment. 4. Recommendation: The Spokane Valley Planning Commission therefore recommends the City Council approve CTA -2018- 0002 as modified. Attachments: Exhibit 1— Proposed Amendment CTA -2018-0002 Approved this 10' day of May, 2018 Planning Commission Chairman ATTEST Deanna Horton, Administrative Assistant Findings and Recommendations of the Spokane Valley Planning Commission CTA -2010-0002 Page 2 of 2 Minutes Spokane Valley Planning Comtnissiotr Council Chambers — City Hall April 12, 2018 I. Choir Rasmussen called the meeting to order al 6:02 p.m. Commissioners, staff and audience stood for the pledge of allegiance. Secretary Deanna I lorton took roll and the following members and staff were present: James Johnson Danielle Kaschlnitter, absent, excused Tion Kelley Mike Phillips Michelle Rasmussen Suzanne Studios, absent - excused Matt Walton Cary Driskell, City Attorney Lori Barlow, Senior Planner Jenny Nickerson, Assistant 13uilding Official Henry Allen, Engineer Marty Palaniuk, Planner Deanna Horton, Secretary tbr the Commission Hearing no objections, Commissioners Stalhos and Kasolunitter were excused from the April 12, 2018 meeting. IL AGENDA: Commissioner Johnson moved to accept the April 12, 2018 agenda as presented. The vote on the motion was five irr firm; zero against and the motion passed 111. MINUTES: Commissioner Johnson moved to approve the Murch 22, 2018 minutes as presented. The vote on the motion was jive inflow, zero against and the motion passed. 1V. COMMISSION REPORTS: The Commissioners had no reports. V. ADMiNiSTRATiVE REPORT: Senior Planner Lori Barlow explained the open space in the mixed use zones discussion was not on the agenda for the evening, as it had been moved in the minutes, the City had been antieipatiug the decision to the SEPA appeal for CPA -2018-0003. She said there had been a scheduling issue for the hearing on the SEPA appeal and the hearing had taken place on March 27, 2018. Once the decision regarding the SEPA appeal is received, the Comprehensive Plan Amendments would he returned to tho agenda. The open space discussion would he placed on the agenda subject to the Comprehensive Plan Amendment deliberations. VL PUBLIC COMMENT: There was no public eominent. VII. COMMISSION BUSINESS: Study Session: CTA -2018-0002, A privately initiated code text intendment to the Spolcane- Valley Munieipal Code to allow lodging in the Industrial zone. Planner Marty Palaniuk presented to the Commission an overview of the privately initiated amendment requesting to add lodging as a supplemental use to the Industrial zone. Mr. Palaniuk explainred lodging is a permitted use in the Mixed Use, Corridor Mixed Use, Regional Commercial,. and industrial Mixed lJse zones. The proposal requests to add a 'WC' in for permitted or conditional use permit in the supplemental language for the Industrial zone in the Permitted Use Matrix. The supplemental language would state that the ltotellmotel would need to have frontage on a principal arterial and if the building footprint were greater than 25,000 square feet, a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) would be required. He mentioned that staff had reviewed the language proposed and if the Commission recommends approval of the proposal, revised language would bo recommended that was consistent with the language and format of the SVMC. The staff revision suggested an "S" in the Permitted Use Matrix, which references the Supplemental Use Regulations; it is further suggested that the supplemental language be placed under the Lodging heading, rather than the industrial heading. All staff suggested revisions are non -substantive to the proposed language. Mr. Puluniuk said there are only three areas in the City this proposal would apply to, in the east along Broadway Avenue in the Yardley urea, north attic. river along Sullivan and north of the river along Barker. Barker is not currently classified as a principal arterial, but there are plans to reclassify it in the future. Much of the urea along Broadway would be restricted because it fulls 2018.0442 Planning Commission Minutes rage 2 01'3 under an airport hazard overlay and high intensity uses, such as a hotel are not permitted in an airport hazard zone. in looking at other jurisdictions, Pasco and Richland allow hotels in their heavy industrial zones. Spokane allows it with a CUP, Spokane County only in light industrial, KennewIek clots not allow hotels in an industrial zone, hut m a Business Park zone, and Federal Way allows the use in u Commercial Enterprise zone. Yakima and Liberty Lake do not allow then in any industrial zone. A Conditional Use Permit is heard by the Hearing Examiner. I le reviews them case by case and can impose conditions basal on the impacts to the su►i•ounding development. Commissioner Johnson asked how the 25,000 square foot number was chosen. Mr. Palaniuk replied this was the number the applicant proposed. Most ofthe smaller hotels in the urea are under this footprint based on research Mr. Palanink had done, except for the Mirabelli' Hotel. Commissioner Walton asked if there was a specific project proposed. Ms. Barlow stated no project has been submitted since It Currently is not an allowed use. Commissioner Rasmussen confirmed that Barker Road is currently not a principal arterial now, but that there are plans to reclassify it in the future. ii. Study Session: FEMA Floodplain review processes Engineer Henry Allen presented to the Commissioners the process for how to modify a FEMA floodplain. The City has six Special Flood Hazard Areas (S1111A) or 100-year floodplains. These are areas having a I% annual chance in any given year to flood. Currently four of them are under review, Porker Draw, Saltese/Shelley Lake, Central Park and Glcnrose. Development can occur In a floodplain and changes to the floodplain boundaries can change based on development, topography changes, mapping errors and proposed changes to the boundaries. Mr. Allen explained several scenarios where the floodplain can be changed. All changes need to be based on current conditions and supported by scientific data. A homeowner could prepare materials and submit to FEMA to have their structure removed from the floodplain because the home is above the Base Flood Elevation (BFE). The documentation is prepared and sent to FEMA for review. Then FEMA determines Wit meets the criteria and sends back a determination. These do not change the map and takes two to three months. These are Letter of Map Amendments (I.OMA or LOMA-F if fill has been used). If a development wants to build in the floodplain, they prepare the necessary documents, explain what they are going to build, how they will mitigalc the floodplain, prepare engineering analysis and send it to FEMA for review and comment. They receive a Conditional Letter of Map Amendment (CLOMR). Anter the development is built, they send the as-hu iIts are sent to FEMA. I1' the as-builts are the same as the proposed information, then FEMA sends back a Letter of Map Amendment and the map is changed. This can take several months or years, depending on the scale. The Porker Draw Alluvial Can started scoping in 2010 and the property owner received the CLOMR March 15, 2018. Developments can change the map by bringing in till to mitigate the floodwaters, this is referred to by a Letter of Map Amendment based on Fill or a CLOMR-F, if the `-F' is on the and, it is based on additional till being brought into the site as a mitigation measure. When the map has topograplticaal and scientific data discrepancies, data is collected, engineering studies are conducted, and reviewed. Iitforinatioa is then sent to FEMA for review and comment. Then the Map is updated. This can take several years. Salton Crcelc/Plats to Shelley Lake began in 2010 and sent to FEMA for review and eminent on March 8, 2018. VIII. GOOD OF THE OI WE1t: There was nothing for the gond of the order. 2018.04.12 Planning Commission Minnles Pate 3 ora IX. X. ADJOURNMENT: Commissioner Johnson moved to adjourn the matting at 7;06 p.m. The vote on the motion was unanimous triANAnr; the motion passed. Micllcllc Rasnlussctt, Chair Date signed 4(,) Deanna Norton, Secretary I. Chair Rasmussen called the pledge of allegiance. present: James Johnson Danielle Kasehmitter Tim Kelley Mike Philips Michelle Rasmussen Suzanne Stathos Matt. Walton APPROVED Minutes Spokane Valley Planning Commission Council Chambers -- City Hall April 26, 2018 the meeting to order at 6:02 p.m. Commissioners, staff and audience stood for Secretary Deanna Horton took roll and the following members and staff were Erik Lamb, Deputy City Attorney Lori Barlow, Senior Planner Jenny Nickerson, Assistant Building Official Marty Palaniuk, Plattner Deanna Horton, Secretary for the Cominission II. AGENDA: Commissioner Johnson moved to accept the April 26, 2018 agenda as presented. The vote on the motion was seven in favor, zero against and the motion passed III. MINUTES: Commissioner Johnson moved to approve the April 12, 2018 minutes as presented. The vote on the motion was seven in favor, zero against and the motion passed I.V. COMMISSION REPORTS: The Commissioners had no reports. V. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT: Senior Planner Lori Barlow informed the Commission the City had received the decision on the appeal of the SEPA decision for the Comprehensive Plan. Amendment CPA -2018-0003. The Hearing Examiner had upheld the City's determination and denied the applicant's appeal. There had not been enough time for staff to prepare for the Comprehensive Plan Amendments for the Planning Commission packet for this meeting so staff will prepare materials for deliberations to continue on May 24, 2018. VI. PUBLIC COMMENT: There was no public comment. VII. COMMISSION BUSINESS: i. Public Hearing: CTA -2018-0002, A privately initiated code text amendment to the Spokane Valley Municipal Code 19.60 and 19.65 to allow lodging in the Industrial zone. Chair Rasmussen opened the public hearing for CTA -2018-0002 at 6:03 p.m. Planner Marty Palaniuk presented to the Commission an overview of the privately initiated code text amendment requesting to add hotel/motel as a supplemental use to the Industrial zone. Mr. Palaniuk explained hotel/motel is a permitted use in the Mixed Use, Corridor Mixed Use, Regional Commercial, and Industrial Mixed Use zones. The Industrial zone allows for all types of manufacturing and industrial type uses. The amendment proposes to allow hotels/motels along principal arterials on a parcel which has frontage along a principal arterial. Mr. Palaniuk said there are three areas in the City this proposal would apply to, Broadway Avenue west of the Interstate, north of Interstate 90 along Sullivan and north of the river along Barker. Barker is not currently classified as a principal arterial, but there are plans to reclassify it in the future. These are the areas along a principal arterial which are zoned ]ndustrial. Much of the area along Broadway would be restricted because it falls under an airport hazard overlay zone (AHO) and high intensity uses like a hotel are those which draw and concentrate people into a certain areas and are not permitted in a AHO zone. There is a small area along Broadway which is outside of the AHO zone which would be available for this proposal. Commissioner Phillips confirmed the AHO was because of the proximity to Felts Field, but wanted to know why it didn't apply to the Spokane International Airport (SIA). Commissioner I(elley offered the hotels at SIA are not in the crash zone, and are allowed to build where they based on their location to those zones. The applicant's proposal requests to add a `PIC' in for permitted or conditional use permit in the supplemental language for the Industrial zone in the Permitted Use Matrix. Staff is recommending that an 'S' be placed in the Permitted Use Matrix which would referenee the supplemental use 2018-04-26 Planning Commission Minutes Page 2 of 5 regulations. Staff also made some suggests instead of placing the use in the Heavy Industrial section of the Use Matrix placing it in under the Lodging heading, along with some minor language changes to make sure it was in line with the way the rest of our code is written. Staff discussed requiring a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) and most of the conditions covered by a CUP would be handled by existing regulations from the Building Code, environmental regulations, SEPA, etc. Ms. Barlow stated although staff has made some minor changes to the language of the proposal in order to snake the proposal more consistent with City code but staff did not made a recommendation on the proposal itself. If the Planning Commission recommends approval of the amendment staff would propose accepting the minor revisions as well. The Chair opened the hearing for public testimony Steve Sclunautz, Spokane WA: Mr. Sehmautz stated he was the applicant for CTA-2018-0002 and principal on the project for the former ITRON site located on Sullivan Road. He stated they are working to develop the 12-acre site into a higher level use with 150,000 square feet of office space, 110,000 square feet of high cube warehouse space, The plan is to. develop an extended-stay business type hotel similar to others in the area. He said has had studies done and there is a demand for this use. He said the product he would be offering would have a different price point, something complimenting the area which is growing northward. What they are considering putting on their site would be less than the footprint in their amendment, catering to sales/business people who service the area, convenient, affordable, more suites, and larger spaces. Commissioner Stathos inquired regarding the campus layout, and Mr. Schmautz stated it would have a bit of everything, office, commercial, warehouse and convenience in the same place on an arterial, Ms. Barlow reminded the Commissioners this was not a project specific, and would affect more than this proposal. Commissioner Walton commented one arguments in the application for the proposal was to reduce trip generation. He wondered how it would do this when many of the other services which hotel patrons need are outside of the industrial areas. Mr. Sehmautz said he has been doing this for a while and the trips would mostly concentrate where the work was near the offices and warehousing facilities. Dwight Hurne, Mead, WA: Mr, Hume said he represents the applicant for CTA-2018-0002. Mr. Hurne stated he remembers when the hotel currently the Industrial Park was built. He commented the need for it was created by the tenants of the park. He believed the Industrial Park had to have a change to the code at that time to allow the hotel, because the Industrial Park needed the facility, and it wasn't allowed until the code was corrected. Corporate visitors could be coming to visit or do training for businesses right in the general area and are less populated on the weekends. He said the hotel would be a convenience to the surrounding businesses which would use it services but the clients would use other services in the area such as restaurants and shopping. He commented that the proposal was requested to be on an arterial so it would handle trip generations and ingress/egress issues. Commissioner Kelley asked Mr. Hume to share his background with the Commission. Mr. Hume is currently a private land use consultant, but spent many years working for Spokane County as their planning director and as a zoning adjustor, which is like a hearing examiner now. Commissioner Johnson asked Mr. Hurne how he felt about changing the proposal to require the project to have frontage on a principal arterial instead of the parcel being on a principal arterial. Commissioner Johnson said he was concerned about a structure being located deep inside a parcel where 1'1 responders would have trouble finding it. Mr. Hume responded the street system would feed to the arterial, but that would be specific to this site. Each site would be different and need its own ingress and egress onto the arterial. He felt there are enough performance standards and development reviews to be able to discover a problem before the doors are opened. Mr. Hume also said other jurisdictions have a CUP process when siting a hotel in an industrial area. Many times the criteria for a CUP has already been met, so he does not know why people should have to go through the process. Ms. Barlow commented the way the language is written a CUP would only be necessary of the proposal was for a building footprint greater than 25,000 square feet. If they did not want to go through the CUP process, it would require the project to be designed to go vertical and protect the valuable industrial space. Mr. Hume stated he wasn't against them, he just 2018-04-26 Planning Commission Minutes Page 3 of 5 feels the criteria is covered in other ways. Commissioner Walton asked why the applicant did not rezone the property to Corridor Mixed Use with all of the allowed uses which would be allowed in the CMU zone. Mr. Hume replied the applicant is not trying to bring the CMU uses into the industrial area, they simply want to bring a hotel use into the industrial zone. There is a demand for it and they felt this would be an appropriate request. Ms. Barlow the intent of the Industrial zone is to provide for industrial uses and allow for some accessory uses, so environment is created where it thrives. The intent of the CMU zone is to allow for uses which are much less intensive. If it was rezoned, it would be stripped of one of the amenities the property offers. It could also be argued the property was spot zoned and surrounding properties have not been given the same rights to the uses allowed in the CMU zone. The proposal brings forward the hotel as an accessory to the Industrial zone instead of stripping those uses and adding uses which might not bo compatible with the surrounding area. Chair Rasmussen seeing no one else who wished to testify closed the public hearing at 6;50 p.m. Commissioner Walton asked Commissioner Johnson about his expressed concern regarding not having a hotel which fronted on a principal arterial. Commissioner Johnson said it might be better, as Mr. Hume had stated, to have the access on a side road. The customers might be going out once or twice a day to somewhere up and down the arterial, but he feels the language should change in order to keep the project out on the arterial so first responders are not having to drive around in the Industrial Park. Commissioner Walton stated he was a bit concerned that this could amount to telling someone how to develop their property. Commissioner Phillips stated he felt having a having hotel in the industrial area was a good idea. He commented developers will build a hotel where it would be most advantageous to them and would not put it off the arterial unless they were catering to a select few clients. He is content with the language the way it is. Commissioner Kelley commented generating more trips are what we want because it means that people are corning to the City and spending money. There would revenue from the rooms, food and beverage, payroll, federal, state and local taxes, sales taxes, payroll taxes, lodging taxes, jobs would be created from the construction, from the new business, more suppliers in the area would spend more money and the employees themselves there by increasing economic development. Commissioner Kelley said he was concerned about making the hotel right on the arterial because it could be a security concern if it was too easy to get to from the street. Commissioner Rasmussen said previously she traveled for work and she appreciated having the hotel next door to where she was going to work in the morning so she did not have to deal with the traffic. She said she felt this amendment would fit the needs of the of the specific business people who visit the area and she supported the amendment. She would leave it to the developers to determine where to put the structure based on their needs. Commissioner Stathos stated the area is adding conveniences for the businesses in the area. She would like to protect the industrial areas for those industrial uses but this is a need which would be beneficial to many businesses in this zone. Commissioner Kasehmitter stated she would support the amendment because she felt it would be good for business and the visitors to have the option. Commissioner Johnson also feels the change would be good for the City. He felt it would be a good addition to the industrial zone, he wanted to make sure there was sufficient protection of the industrial land. He said he was not in favor of a CUP. He wanted to protect staff from having to make any interpretations of the code. He wants the language to be specific so there is no misunderstanding. Commissioner Walton said he agreed and specific language allows for less interpretation and would be important to him. He is concerned that allowing an expansion of ause to this zone when there are hotels in the surrounding area which are not at capacity. He wanted to make sure that the industrial land is protected. Commissioner Walton stated his concern with the CUP process and how the hotels could be allowed with little control except for the amount of square footage. Commissioner Rasmussen and Kelley talked about their experiences in being in a hotel in more industrial areas and how they found them beneficial and how the users of the hotels would benefit the area. Commissioner Kelley is in favor of allowing the hotels, but is not necessarily in favor of a larger hotel, 25,000 square 2018-04-26 Planning Commission Minutes Page 4 of 5 feet, in the area. Commissioner Phillips said he was fine with a CUP for a hotel over 25,000 square feet footprint. Ms. Barlow wanted to remind the Commission when they made a recommendation, staff had made some suggested language to the amendment to make it more consistent with the way the Municipal Code is written. Commissioner Walton said his preference would be to eliminate a hotel greater than 25,000 would not be allowed in the industrial zone, so that it would preserve the most amount of land for those purposes. If someone wanted a larger hotel, then they would need to go vertical instead of horizontal in order to increase the amount of rooms they could offer. This would eliminate the CUP process. Commissioner Walton moved to recommend approval of CTA -2018-0002 to the City Council with the proposed changes from staff, but modifying the language in SVMC 19.65.080(B)(1) to read `A hotel/motel is allowed in the "1" zoning district on sites with frontage on a principal arterial provided hotel/motel use has a building footprint of 25,000 square feet or less.' Motion died for lack of a second. Commissioner Kelly moved to recommend approval of CTA -2018-0002 to the City Council as revised by staff. This motion was seconded. The vole on the motion by show of hands was five in favor., two against with Commissioners Johnson and Walton dissenting. il. Study Session: Open Space Requirements in Mixed Use Zones. Ms, Barlow gave a quick presentation to remind the Commission the subject for discussion of the open space requirements in the mixed use zones. She also discussed that projects in mixed use zones which had been developed and stated all had provided some kind of open space. She also reviewed the requirements of other jurisdictions and most have some form open space requirements, She also shared several examples of mixed use development. The code currently requires any development, multifamily or mixed use, in a mixed use zone would require open space to be provided at a rate of 210 square feet per unit for any development which has more than 10 un its. Options which could be considered are: • Separate vertical and horizontal developments • Separate Multifamily and mixed use • Separate Mixed Use zone from Corridor Mixed Use • Increase the distance from a public park or trail • Increase the unit threshold • Increase the amount of open space required per unit • Increase the amount of units required before the open space is required • Leave the requirements as they are currently written • Eliminate the requirements completely Commissioner Phillips confirmed the latest update to the development regulations there are no setback requirements in the mixed use zones. Commissioner Johnson confirmed Spokane does not have any open space requirements in a mixed use zone. Spokane County does not have a requirement but offers incentives if they are added to a mixed use development. Commissioner Johnson pointed out that about 90% of the areas being discussed would be except, but the rest of the areas he would not want to have some kind of open space requirements. Most of the areas are close to transit, places we want there to be vertical growth, and people who live in these places have a different lifestyle. He said he didn't think there should be a requirement in those cases. Commissioner Philips' concern has been someone trying to build a multifamily project in the MU or CMU zone so they could get out of the open space requirement. After listening to some of the conversations, he thinks maybe this requirement would not be necessary in these zones and would make us more equal with the County and Spokane. Commissioner Walton feels that a dedicated multifamily development in these zones should have different requirements than a mixed use development. There was considerable discussion about why the City does not have mixed use development. Ms. Barlow shared a consultant for the City, at the time of the Comprehensive Plan 2018-04-26 Planning Commission Minutes Page 5 of 5 Update, said there is not enough density in the City to drive it tight now. Discussion of how much commercial there should be required in order to consider the project as mixed use. Commissioner Rasmussen said she did not want to stand in the way of any mixed-use project which would want to build here, Commissioner Kelley said he supports no open space for a vertical environment, but for multifamily, open space should be required, At the end of the discussion the consensus was to have staff separate the mixed use development from the multifamily, to define what would be a mixed-use development, look at whether or not the 1,300 foot requirement from a park or trail would still need to be included and remove the Language regarding the "fee in lieu' altogether. VIII. GOOD OF THE ORDER: Commissioner Walton discussed when a motion is actually made, especially when the subject has had a bit of discussion back and forth and everyone might not be in agreement with the solution, there should be some extra discussion on the merits of the motion itself before taking a vote. IX. ADJOURNMENT: Commissioner Johnson moved to adjourn the meeting at 8:36 p.m. The vote on the motion was trrnaninions in favor, the notion passed. Miche le Rasmussen, Chair ( Date signed Deanna Horton, Secretary APPROVED Minutes Spokane Valley Planning Commission Council Chambers -- City Hall May 10, 2018 Chair Rasmussen called the meeting to order at 6:01 p.m. Commissioners, staff and audience stood for the pledge of allegiance. Secretary Deanna Horton took roll and the following members and staff were present: Jaynes Johnson Cary Driskell, City Attorney Danielle Kaschmitter Lori Barlow, Senior Planner Tim Kelley Jenny Nickerson, Assistant Building Official Mike Phillips Marty Palaniuk, Planner Michelle Rasmussen Micki Harnois, Planner Suzanne Stathos, arrived at 6:04 p.m. Karen Kendall, Planner Matt Walton Deanna Horton, Secretary for the Commission Hearing no objections the Commission excused Commissioner Stathos H. AGENDA: Cotnrnissioner Johnson moved to accept the May 10, 2018 agenda as presented. The vole on the motion was six in, favor, zero against and the motion passed. III. MINUTES: There were no minutes to approve. IV. COMMISSION REPORTS: The Commissioners had no reports. V. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT: Senior Planner Lori Barlow informed the Commission the city of Millwood is holding a Planning Short Course May 23, 2018 and suggested anyone who had not attended one previously should consider attending. This Short Course is produced by the Washington State Department of Commerce and provides good information. VI. PUBLIC COMMENT: There was no public comment. VII. COMMISSION BUSINESS: i. Planning Commission Findings of Fact for CTA -2018-0002, a privately initiated code text amendment to the Spokane Valley Municipal Code 19.60 and 19.65 to allow lodging in the Industrial zone. Planner Marty Palaniuk presented the Planning Commission's Findings of Fact for CTA -2018- 0002, a privately initiated code text amendment to Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) to allow hotels/motels in the Industrial zone. Mr. Palaniuk explained the Findings reflect the Planning Commission's recommendation to the City Council: to allow hotels/motels with a building footprint of 25,000 square feet or less in the Industrial zone, a building footprint of more than 25,000 square feet, would need a Conditional Use Permit (CUP). Also adopted were minor language changes recommended by staff, to bring the original amendment language in line with the way the rest of the SVMC code is written. Commissioner Johnson clarified the 25,000 square foot footprint only referred to the building size on the ground and did not dictate the overall size the building could be. Commissioner Kelley !moved to accept the Findings for CTA -2018-0002 as presented Commissioner Walton stated he was still strongly opposed to the language allowing a structure with a building footprint larger than 25,000 square feet. He said the applicant was not seeking anything larger and it would be a mistake to allow larger structures to take up more Industrial zoned land. Commissioner Kelley confirmed Mr. Walton is comfortable with a structure which has a 25,000 square feet or smaller footprint. Commissioner Walton noted he had moved to adopt language which excluded a larger structure but that motion had died for Iack of a second. Commissioner Kelley renewed his support of the hotels/motels for what they can bring into the City by means of tax base, employment, other services, retail sales, business sales. Commissioner Johnson agreed the amendment was a good idea but feels the CUP process was extra regulation which was unnecessary, and felt this part of the arnendment needed further discussion and should 2018-05-10 Planning Commission Minutes Page 2 of 5 have been removed from the proposal. He also felt that the location of the project should be closer to the arterial, and that not adding language to the amendment to require it lacked proper prudence. The motion passed, by a show of hands, with jbur in favor and three against, with Commissioners Johnson, Stathos and Walton dissenting. ii. Deliberations: 2018 Comprehensive Plan Amendments CPA -2018-0001 Planner Micki Harnois reminded the Commission that CPA -2018-0001 is located approximately 300 east of Pines on Valleyway. The request is to change the Comprehensive Plan designation from Single Family Residential (SFR) to Multifamily Residential (MFR) and from R-3 to Multifamily zoning. The property is bordered to the north and south by MFR and to the west by Corridor Mixed Use (CMU). Commissioner Johnson said he sympathized with people who did not want to have development intrude into their neighborhood but this was only a few hundred feet from the corridor and nothing stays the same forever. Commissioner Walton stated he felt it would match the rest of the surrounding areas. Commissioner Johnson moved to recommend approval of CTA -2018-0001. Commissioner Stathos asked where the line is drawn in order to stop development from encroaching into the neighborhoods. Commissioner Walton said he sympathized with Commissioner Stathos' comment and felt the Planning Commission exists to determine where change was appropriate, and he felt this change was appropriate in this area. The motion passed with a vote of six in favor, one against with Commissioner Stathos dissenting. CPA -2018-0003 Mr. Palaniuk reminded the Commission that CPA -2018-0003 was located on Bowdish Road just north of the intersection with Sands Road. The request is to change the designation from SFR to CMU and the zoning from R-2 to CMU. Mr. Palaniuk said this parcel is located in a floodplain, has alluvium soils, has a fish -bearing stream running through it and is south of the railroad tracks. The contiguous parcels which meet the criteria to make the request for the change are across the railroad right-of-way to the north, which is designated CMU. Commissioner Kelley discussed many of the objections which had been raised during the public hearing, schools would be over crowded, the traffic would increase, property values would decrease, there was not enough notice given and crime would increase. He noted that these issues are often brought up when a multifamily project is proposed. He commented that rarely do any of these things actually happen. He noted Ms. Barlow said there was plenty of notice given. Commissioner Walton said the request was to change from SFR to CMU has more uses than just multifamily which need to be considered when before allowing the change. Commissioner Johnson said when he visited the site in February and the homes in the front of the site are an extension of the surrounding neighborhood. He felt the transition between those homes and Dishman-Mica needed to be preserved, and this is not the right change for this area. Commissioner Phillips said he does not feel the CMU should reach across the railroad tracks to the south into the residential neighborhoods. Commissioner Stathos said she was concerned about the floodplain on the property and comments the citizens had made. Commissioner Kaschmitter said she had concerns regarding the floodplain, fire evacuations, soil contamination and the outpouring of people who were against the change. Commissioner Walton said he noted all of the citizen comments, but in the staff report it noted that the request was not consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The allowable uses for the CMU designation were not appropriate for the area and the requested change was not consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, Commissioner Rasmussen said she was concerned about neighbors who live next to the request stating they have had water in their backyards and not allowing the CMU to encroach past the logical division of the railroad tracks. Commissioner Johnson proved to recommend denial of CPA -2018-0003 to the City Council. The motion passed with a vote of six in favor and one against with Connmissioner Kelley dissenting. 2018-05-10 Planning Commission Minutes Page 3 of 5 CPA -2018-0004 Mr. Palaniuk said CPA -2018-0004 was located at the corner of 7s' Avenue and University Road. The request is to change the designation from SFR to Neighborhood Commercial (NC) and the zoning from R-3 to NC. The applicant owns an adjacent parcel which was designated NC during the 2016 Comprehensive Plan Update. During the public hearing, several citizens had commented that language on the subdivision plat could prohibit commercial development on any property located within the subdivision without a vote of the subdivision members. The Commissioners asked City Attorney Cary Driskell to opine on how this covenant would affect the property change. Mr. Driskell stated that covenants are a civil matter between parties and does not affect any decision that the Commission would make. The City has the legal right to rezone the property. The covenants could affect development in the future; however, a single-family residence is still an allowed use on the property. Commissioner Johnson said he understood the comments regarding increased in traffic in the neighborhood as was suggested by many who testified, but there was also a need for more NC in many areas. He also conformed a Coundllmember had requested that staff add more areas of NC in the City during the Comprehensive Plan update. Commissioner Walton said he understood the objections but since both parcels were owned by the same person, he felt it placed the property owner at a disadvantage when the parcels were zoned differently. Commissioner Kelley said the Commission had discussions during the Comprehensive Pian Update about having more services. in the neighborhoods. The two parcels are right on University Road and fit all the criteria discussed for the NC during the Update. Commissioner Kasehinitter agreed. Commissioner Johnson moved to recommend approval of CPA -2018-0004 to the City Council. The motion passed with a vote of Sven in favor, and zero against. CPA -2018-0005 Commissioner Phillips recused himselffrom this amendment and left the room. Planner Karen Kendall reminded the Commission this amendment was correcting a mapping error where several parcels were split zoned during the Comprehensive Plan Update. The parcels are located at the apex of Progress and Forker Roads. The City is proposing to correct the zoning by having the NC zone along the north and east portion above the Bonneville Power Easement and south and west of the easement changed to SFR. The Commissioners had no concerns regarding this amendment. Commissioner Johnson moved to recommend approval of CTA -2018-0005 to the City Council The motion passed with a vote of six in favor and zero against. CPA -2018-0006 Commissioner Phillips returned to the room. Ms. Kendall explained the parcel for this amendment is located on Trent Road just east of Sullivan, and the easterly 15 feet of the parcel is designated as SFR and the remainder of the parcel is designated Industrial Mixed Use (IMU). The proposal is to designate the entire parcel as 1MU. The Commissioners had no concerns regarding this correction. Connnissiorzer Johnson moved to recommend approval of CTA -2018-0006 to the City Council. The motion passed with a vote of seven in favor and zero against. iii. Discussion to Rescind CTA -2018-0002 Commissioner Walton moved to rescind the motion regarding CTA -2018-0002 due to a procedural error. Commissioner Walton stated he felt the topic needed more discussion, especially since the vote to approve the findings was four to three. He also felt there had been an error in parliamentary procedure during the April 26, 2018 meeting while recommending approval of the amendment, a privately initiated code text amendment to allow hotels/motels in the Industrial zone. The vote on the motion to recommend approval of the amendment as submitted with minor changes passed with 2018-05-10 Planning Commission Minutes Page 4 of 5 a vote of five in favor, two against. Although the Commissioners had discussed the merits of the amendment under small board miles, when the adopted motion was put to the floor, there was no discussion on the merits of the main motion itself before the Commission voted on it, which Commissioner Walton felt was in error. There was discussion as to whether the motion to rescind was the proper main motion and the Commission took a break for staff to research the topic. After review of Roberts Rules of Order, it was determined the motion to rescind was in order, however it would have been more timely had it been made prior to the Findings of Fact supporting the Planning Commission's decision on CTA -2018-0002. If the motion to rescind passes, then there will need to be extra work to reconsider the Findings since they currently support CTA -2018- 0002 as it passed. Commissioner Walton stated he felt the Commission moved too quickly to take the vote on the adopted motion and Commissioners should have been given an opportunity to discuss the merits of the main motion on the floor. He feels that were several strong viewpoints that could have changed minds, there could have been amendments to the motion had the opportunity been there. However in moving to vote right after the motion was made, did not allow for the proper discussion of the merits of the motion itself. Commissioner Kelley said there is a proper procedure but many times based on small board rules all the elements are there, but not necessarily in the correct order. While he agrees there should be discussion every time, it does not always happen with this group and up until now, no one has had an issue with this process. He believes the topic was thoroughly discussed before it was voted on. Commissioners Stathos and Kaschmitter had no comment. Commissioner Johnson said he remembered Commissioner Kelley making a motion without the 25,000 square foot requirement with the CUP requirement but the motion was not very clear to him. After some conversation, Mr. Kelley made a motion to accept the amendment as it was written. Commissioner Johnson said it seemed the motion was unclear, and then all of the sudden there was a vote on it. Commissioner Kelley said his only confusion was when Ms. Barlow interjected that he adopted staff's proposed language changes, otherwise he said he was aware of what his motion was. Commissioner Walton added he understands that while at times the Commission does follow small board rules, it does not relinquish its right to follow the proper procedures when adopting a motion for Commission business. He also said to Commissioner Johnson's point, he was confused about what the actual motion before he was asked to vote on it, Commissioner Phillips stated he seconded the motion made by Commissioner Kelley and he understood the motion, whether it was understood by anyone else, five people voted in favor of it. Someone understood it enough to vote on it. Commissioner Walton said he was going to make one more plea that there is order and procedure for a reason. If they are not followed, there has to be a remedy for it, especially if there was an opportunity to seek clarification or to add additional clarification. He appreciates the extensive discussion prior to the motion being made, but after the motion is made there needs to be opportunity offer amendments and additional discussion based on the language of the motion itself before there is a vote. This did not occur during the vote of CTA -2018-0002, which violated proper procedure; he encourages the Commission to consider this when voting on the motion to rescind the motion. The motion failed with a vote of three in favor and four against with C°onrrnissioners Kaschmitter; Kelley, Phillips and Rasmussen dissenting. VIM GOOD OF THE ORDER: Thanks to staff and Commission members for discussion on parliamentary procedure. IX, ADJOURNMENT: Commissioner Johnson moved to adjourn the meeting at 7:46 p.m. The vote on the :motion was unanimous in favor, the motion passed. 2018-05-101'lannin n1Lnissien Minute 2 Michelle Rasmussen, Chair ` Date signed Deanna Horton, Secretary l'age 5 of 5 COMMUNITY AND PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING & PLANNING Spokane dool*Valley STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION CTA -2018-0002 STAFF REPORT DATE: April 18, 2018 HEARING DATE AND LOCATION: April 26, 2018, beginning at 6:00 p.m., Spokane Valley City Hall Council Chambers, 10210 East Sprague Avenue, Spokane Valley, Washington 99206. PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: A privately -initiated text amendment to SVMC 19.60.050 and SVMC 19.65.080 to allow a hotel/motel in the Industrial zone subject to a conditional use permit (CUP) only if the building footprint exceeds 25,000 square feet. APPROVAL CRITERIA: Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan, SVMC 17.80,150, 19.30.040. SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS: Staff concludes that the proposed amendments to SVMC 19,60.050 and SVMC 19.65.080 are consistent with minimum criteria for review and approval, and with the Comprehensive Plan. STAFF CONTACT: Martin Palaniuk, Planner and Lori Barlow, AICP, Senior Planner ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit 1: CTA -2018-0002 Application, attachment and proposed amendments to chapter 19.60.050 SVMC, and chapter 19.65.080 SVMC, Exhibit 2: Staff revised proposed amendments Exhibit 3: Presentation BACKGROUND INFORMATION 1. APPLICATION PROCESSING: SVMC Chapter 17.80, Permit Processing Procedures. The following table summarizes the procedural steps for the proposal. Process Date Application Submitted February 21, 2018 Determination of Completeness February 26, 2018 SEPA — DNS Issued March 23, 2018 Published Notice of Public Hearing: April 6, 2018 Department of Conunerce 60 -day Notice of Intent to Adopt Amendment April 18, 2018 PROPOSAL BACKGROUND: The proposal is to allow hotels and motels on sites with frontage on a principal arterial in the Industrial zone. if the building footprint is greater than 25,000 square feet, the use would be subject to a conditional use permit. The proposal modifies the SVMC 19.60.050 Permitted Uses Matrix and SVMC 19.65.080 Lodging - Supplemental Use Regulations. The intent is to allow hotels/motels in the Industrial zone, but keep the hotel/motel location on the perimeter of the industrial areas to minimize conflict with industrial related activities, such as truck traffic and hazardous operations. The Applicant has StaffReport and Recommendation CTA -2018-0002 noted its view that hotels are needed in the Industrial zone to provide proximal lodging for commuting workers — an evolving trend where workers commute to the job, but maintain permanent residence elsewhere. Analysis: Currently hotels and motels are allowed in four zones, (see Table 1 below) without supplemental regulations. The proposed amendment would permit hotels and motels in the Industrial zone only if the site has frontage on a principal arterial. This limits potential sites to Industrial zoned properties adjacent to North Sullivan Road (in the NE corporate limits) and a limited area along Broadway Avenue (in the westerly corporate limits) that 1 ies outside of the Airport Hazard Overlay Zone (AHOZ). Pursuant to SVMC 19.110.030(1)(E)(1)(f), high intensity uses are prohibited. Table 1— Current Zoning Allowances for Hotels and Motels Residential Mixed Use Commercial Industrial Parks and Open Space R-1 R-2 R-3 MFR MU CMU NC Hotel/motel P P RC IMU P P POS The development regulations pertaining to a hotel/motel use in the zones that currently allow hotels and motels were compared to the Industrial zone. The only difference in the regulations was that uses located in the Industrial zone are exempt from landscaping requirements for the site and parking areas (See Table 2). In the absence of setbacks, height requirements, etc, in the Zoning Code, the International Building Code (IBC) and the International Fire Code (ITC) will determine any setbacks, height etc., It was noted that transitional regulations are called out where properties of more intensive zoning abut less intensively zoned properties. However, a review of the areas affected by the proposal notes that these circumstances do not exist and therefore transitional regulations would not be triggered. Table 2 Zoning Regulations Comparison Regulations Zones MU/CMU/RC/IMU 1 Setbacks N/A N/A Lot size N/A N/A Lot coverage N/A N/A Density N/A N/A Height N/A N/A Landscaping and renting Required for site and parking areas pursuant to chapter 22.70 SVMC Fencing, Landscaping and Screening Uses in the Industrial Zone are exempt from the landscaping requirement for the site and parking areas; fence regulations are the same Signage Required to same standard -- based on "Nonresidential Zones" Parking Required to same standard - based on "Use" The lands capacity analysis presented in the September 2015 Existing Conditions Housing and Economic Trends Report prepared for the Comprehensive Plan update identified that the City had at that time 1250 net buildable acres of commercial and industrial lands, with the majority of the lands located in the industrial Page 2 of 5 Staff Report and Recommendation zones. The analysis concluded that the city had sufficient development for the twenty year planning horizon. Exhibit 3. Buildable Commercial and Industrial Land Net Net Underutilized Net Buildable Zone Vacant Acres Acres Acres Share 1-2 379 1-1 201 MUC 105 RC 44 CMU 37 C 28 0 25 GO 9 NC 3 Total 831 208 65 52 x,47 29 7 5 2 419 587 46.9% 266 2L3'% 109 8.7% 96 7.7% 84 6.7% 57 4.5% 32 2.5% 14 1.2 x 5 0.4% 1,250 100.0% CTA -2018-0002 capacity for commercial, industrial and residential The intent of the Industrial zone (I) is to provide lands for industrial development (manufacturing, processing, fabrications, assembly, disassembly, and freight -handling) - uses that could have significant noise, odor, or aesthetic impacts. Non- industrial uses should be limited to preserve industrial land viability but ancillary uses should be permitted to serve the industrial uses. The proposed CTA -2018-0002 also includes amended language that provides that if the proposed hotel/motel has a building footprint greater than 25,000 square feet, a conditional use permit is required. The proposed language would allow a development with as many floors and rooms as the site could support without a conditional use permit (CUP) because the total square footage is not linked to a CUP. This language suggests that a three—story, 75,000 square foot hotel or motel with a 25,000 square foot footprint could be constructed without a CUP, but a smaller 2 story hotel with a total area of 55,000 square feet and a footprint of 27,500 square feet could require a CUP However maintaining a footprint of 25,000 square feet or less leads to a more intense use of the land with vertical construction and results in preserving lands for industrial uses. For comparison to understand the scale of such a structure the new city hall building has a total area of —43,000 square feet and three floors; a current building permit for a hotel includes a total area of 29,000 square feet and will include over 200 rooms. If the CUP process is linked to a footprint rather than the total square footage, a CUP may never be required by virtue of design driving vertical development. Impacts from a hotel or motel use would generally be addressed by the City's development regulations or other agencies with jurisdiction, i.e. fire, water, sewer. The SVMC would address site development impacts such as drainage, access, parking, signage, etc., Traffic impacts are typically addressed through the concurrency requirement and mitigated through the SEPA review process. Large trip generators are typically required to provide a traffic study. Discussions with the Assistant Building Official note the following: • The Building and Fire Codes (adopted by reference pursuant to Title 24 SVMC) generally dictate property line setbacks and other protective measures where hazardous or dangerous uses occupy buildings/sites. The Building and Fire Codes dictate property line setbacks due to the fact that the development under consideration generally has no control over the existing or future development of an adjacent site. • If a large industrial parcel is developed with a hotel and the developer wishes to utilize the remainder of the site for a hazardous industrial use, there could be restrictions which would dictate no -build areas or fine lanes to provide the protection normally afforded by the property line setback requirements. A review of the regulations in place notes that all anticipated impacts from this use, including location and proximity to other uses, would be addressed by existing regulations. Page 3 of 5 Staff Report and Recommendation CTA -2018-0002 The Applicant has noted that the market requires lodging uses to be proximal to the work place to provide convenient alternatives for workers who may commute during the week and maintain a permanent residence elsewhere, or lodging for the increased number of persons involved in routine visits that involve short term stays and desire to be close to the site. Currently lodging is allowed in the four zones discussed above. The analysis discussed in this report did not consider whether allowing lodging in the Industrial zone would result in a significant shift of lodging uses to the industrial areas from the corridors based on land values, nor consider the impacts to the industrial land capacity by allowing additional non -industrial uses. The location of the land along arterials in the Industrial zone suggests a limited customer base with a direct correlation to the viability of the site for hotels and motels. Requiring that lodging sites have principal arterial frontage minimizes the opportunity for development and leads to a conclusion that the impact to available industrial lands would be marginal. A. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO THE MUNICIPAL CODE TEXT AMENDMENT 1. Compliance with Title 17 (General Provisions) of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code a. Findings: SVMC I7.80.150(F) Municipal Code Text Amendment Approval Criteria i. The City may approve Municipal Code Text amendment, if it finds that (I) The proposed text amendment is consistent with the applicable provisions of the Comprehensive Plan; Staff Analysis: The proposed amendment is supported by the Comprehensive Plan and is consistent with the following goals and policies: Goal ED -GI: Support economic opportunities and employment growth for Spokane Valley. Goal ED -04: Collaborate with relevant economic development stakeholders, including the business community, to grow a strong and healthy regional economy; Goal ED -G5: Support and encourage the development of a strong workforce that is globally competitive and responds to the changing needs of the workplace. Goal ED -G6: Maintain a positive business climate that strives for flexibility, predictability and stability. Goal LU -G3: Support the transformation of commercial, industrial, and mixed —use areas into accessible districts that attract economic activity; Goal LU -G4: Ensure that land use plans, regulations, review processes, and infrastructure improvements support economic growth and vitality. Goal LU -P12: Maintain a robust supply of productive industrial land. (2) The proposed amendment bears a substantial relation to public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment; Staff Analysis: The amendment bears substantial relation to public health, safety, welfare and protection of the environment. The amendment allows hotel and motel uses to locate proximal to concentrated work environments in specific areas that limit conflict with industrial uses, and maintain adequate opportunities for industrial development within the industrial zone. Further, anticipated impacts of the use would be addressed by existing regulations. Page 4 of 5 Staff Report and Recommendation CTA -2018-0002 b. Conclusion(s): The proposed text amendment is consistent with the approval criteria contained in the SVMC. 2. Finding and Conclusions Specific to Public Comments a. Findings: No public comments have been received to date. b. Conclusion(s): In the absence of public comments, staff makes no conclusions. 3. Finding and Conclusions Specific to Agency Comments a. Findings: No substantive agency comments have been received to date. b. Conclusion(s): In the absence of substantive agency comments, staff makes no conclusions. B. OVERALL CONCLUSION The proposed code text amendment is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan policies and goals. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff makes no recommendation on the privately initiated code text amendment. However, if the Planning Commission recommends approval of the code text amendment, staff has revised the proposed code text amendment to be consistent with the terminology and format of the SVMC with no substantive changes to content (see attached). Page 5 of 5 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: June 19, 2018 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ® new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Motion Consideration: Authorization to City Manager to issue Termination Notice to Spokane County Regarding Hearing Examiner Interlocal Agreement GOVERNING LEGISLATION: Chapter 39.34 RCW; chapter 18.20 SVMC. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: The City has contracted with Spokane County for hearing examiner services since the City's inception in 2003. BACKGROUND: Mike Dempsey served in the role of Hearing Examiner for both Spokane County and Spokane Valley from 2003 until December 31, 2017. Spokane County then hired David Hubert as the new Hearing Examiner. Mr. Hubert has heard several matters in 2018, but has also recused himself from hearing two matters relating to development applications from Diamond Rock Construction, which is owned by Dennis Crapo. Mr. Hubert apparently has a long-standing relationship with the Crapo family which creates a potential issue regarding the Appearance of Fairness Doctrine. This doctrine relates to actual or potential conflicts of interest in decision -makers, and ensures that parties appearing before such decision -makers are free from such conflicts. This doctrine is critical in the public having confidence that critical land -use decisions are made on objective bases, rather than on personal relationships. Staff want to make it extremely clear that neither Mr. Hubert nor Mr. Crapo are believed to be engaging in conduct that would violate the Appearance of Fairness Doctrine. Mr. Crapo owns a large amount of residential property in the City, and is a very active developer. Based on their prior relationship, Mr. Hubert has been careful to recuse himself from matters relating to Mr. Crapo. Unfortunately, this is creating a situation for the City where it has multiple hearing examiners, Mr. Hubert and a pro tem hearing examiner from the City of Spokane, Brian McGinn. This results in staff needing to work with two separate staff to prepare for various matters (not at the same time), including staff reports, scheduling, noticing, updates regarding the Spokane Valley Municipal Code, etc. Staff believes it would be in the best interests of the City to terminate the interlocal agreement for provision of hearing examiner services and determine how best to obtain such services from another party. The interlocal agreement requires a minimum of 180 days' notice for any termination. The timing of this notice reflects the City's attempt to minimize any budgetary impact this action would have on the County as a mid -year action. As such, any new hearing examiner the City hired would not start until January 1, 2019. If Council agrees with this proposed action, staff would begin the process of identifying how the services would be provided by somebody else. The following is a list of the hourly rates the City has paid for these services from Spokane County over the past three years, and which we anticipate would be similar into the future: 2015 - $12,639 2016 - $21,662 2017 - $30,021 ($140 per hour) ($137 per hour) ($141 per hour) OPTIONS: (1) Authorize the City Manager to send 180 day notice of termination to Spokane County of the Interlocal Agreement for Hearing Examiner Services in the City of Spokane Valley; or (2) take other action as appropriate. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: I move we authorize the City Manager to send 180 day notice to Spokane County of the termination of the Interlocal Agreement for Hearing Examiner Services in the City of Spokane Valley. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Unknown. STAFF CONTACT: Cary Driskell, City Attorney. ATTACHMENTS: CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: June 19, 2018 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ® new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Motion Consideration: Real property acquisition — 729 South Carnahan GOVERNING LEGISLATION: SVMC 3.49.010. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: BACKGROUND: The City has been studying the layout of the intersection at 8t' Avenue and Carnahan Road for some time because it is an off -set intersection, with a physical constraint in the form of a large rock outcropping on the southwest corner. This outcropping impacts options available to the City in the event the City were to undertake a project to alter the intersection. Please note that the City does not currently have plans or funding to undertake this intersection project. The attachments show both potential intersection configurations. Staff has determined that there are likely two options to alter the intersection to remove the offset. First, the City could construct a roundabout in this intersection. The second option could be a signalized intersection. Current traffic counts do not warrant a signal. However, a ten percent increase in traffic volumes would trigger the 4 -hour vehicular volume signal warrant. Either option would require the City to acquire property from two different lots, one at 729 South Carnahan (corner lot), and the lot at 707 South Carnahan. The amount of land needed from these two lots would be different depending on whether the signalized intersection or roundabout was chosen. The attachments show the two potential options with the maximum acquisition needed from each parcel. The City previously purchased 707 South Carnahan. The lot at 729 South Carnahan is approximately .9 acres, and is zoned Mixed Use. It is owned by Michael and Michelle Yarborough. It has a residence, unattached garage, and a separate outbuilding shop behind the house. Staff is proposing that the City acquire the entire lot, then dedicate the maximum property needed for the intersection project from both 729 and 707 South Carnahan, and then put both parcels on the market. These properties, which are .9 acres each, could be purchased separately or together and used for mixed use or residential purposes. The real estate market is extremely active right now, and the City hopes to recoup most of its expenses from these two purchases by selling both parcels in the very near future. Staff has used the real property procurement policies required by federal law for projects that may be funded with federal funds. Typically, the City receives around 83% funding for these types of federal projects. A consequence of using the federal process, however, is that this process is very stringent. The City is required to pay fair market value which is determined by an appraisal that assumes the highest and best use of the property. In addition, the property owner is entitled to moving expenses and incidental expenses related to their relocation such as inspection fees, appraisal fees, and other incidentals related to the closing of a new property. The property owner is also entitled to the additional cost for purchasing a comparable replacement housing (`price differential'). The price differential is determined by using comparable houses which are currently in the market (i.e. their sale cannot be pending or contingent). This is required to ensure the property owner is not disadvantaged in having to sell at the jurisdiction's request, and to allow the seller the ability to get into essentially the same type of house if they would like. This market differential only comes into play, however, if the seller then buys a more expensive house, up to $329,900. For this purchase, the total projected cost to the City is as follows, which are all required under the federal process. Staff is also including an extra $10,000 in the authorization in the event there are incidental costs not currently identified. If there are no such costs, this extra amount would not be spent. Purchase price (appraisal price) Market differential (difference b/n $292,000 and $329,000) — up to Closing costs (estimate) Incidentals expense (estimate) Moving expenses (self -move option) TOTAL (with additional $10,000 for unknown incidental costs) $292,000 $ 37,900 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 2,200 $362,100 As mentioned above, staff will endeavor to recoup as much of this money as it can by dedicating the property it needs for the intersection project, and then quickly putting the property on the market for resale. The other option the City has is to identify the maximum amount of property it needs for the project, and then pursue condemnation and force the sale of just that portion it needs. This would likely be a much more contentious process than a negotiated purchase, and often ends up in trial. Most jurisdictions use condemnation to avoid acquiring more property than they need, but the City has not used it in its 15 years of being a city. Staff can provide additional information at a subsequent meeting if Council is interested in pursuing this option. OPTIONS: (1) Authorize the City Manager to complete this negotiated transaction with the Yarbroughs; (2) Take other action as appropriate. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: I move we authorize the City Manager to finalize and execute all documents necessary to complete the acquisition of the property at 729 South Carnahan in an amount not to exceed $362,100. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Up to $362,100, will be expended from Capital Reserve Fund #312 which staff will try to recoup to the greatest extent possible by reselling the property after dedicating necessary right-of-way for the future intersection project. Proceeds from the sale will be redeposited in Capital Reserve Fund #312. STAFF CONTACT: Cary Driskell, City Attorney; Bill Helbig, City Engineer. ATTACHMENTS: Conceptual design options for future intersection project at 8t1 Avenue and Carnahan. CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: June 19, 2018 Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ information ® admin. report Department Director Approval: ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Intelligent Transportation System/Spokane Regional Transportation Management Center (ITS/SRTMC) GOVERNING LEGISLATION: PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: 2015, 03-24: Informational memorandum on SRTMC Interlocal Agreement 2015, 03-31: Admin report on SRTMC Interlocal Agreement 2015, 04-14: Motion passed to approve SRTMC Interlocal Agreement amendment #1 2015, 12-08: Motion passed to approve SRTMC Interlocal Agreement amendment #2 2016: 11-08: Motion passed to approve SRTMC renewal Interlocal BACKGROUND: Since 2002, the Spokane Regional Transportation Management Center (SRTMC) has been a regional collaboration of the Washington State Department of Transportation and multiple jurisdictions working together to improve traffic flow and safety while providing reliable transportation information services for the traveling public. The City of Spokane Valley is among SRTMC's regional partners who work together to link the infrastructure and technology resources to support each other through equipment sharing and incident coordination. New SRTMC and Electronics Manager, Becky Spangle along with Spokane Valley staff will give a current overview of the Transportation Management Center and provide an update of the regional and local intelligent transportation system. OPTIONS: Discussion RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Discussion BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Each year the City of Spokane Valley budgets $15,000 to pay partner dues. This is a recurring expense. STAFF/OTHER CONTACT: Becky Spangle, SRTMC & Electronics Manager John Hohman, Deputy City Manager Ray Wright, Sr. Engineer, Traffic ATTACHMENTS: PowerPoint Presentation SPOKANE cr_ T■iAN 1 TA IC' N NAGF flF ■ CFNITPR CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY CITY COUNCIL June 19, 2018 SPOKANE Pr— { t i Wastiirtyton State _' ` _ Department of Transportation SRTC SDoka i Tiaosir ,,,, i'OU tliwluL nwstcaurwM tour<u r tp^ dloVai 1 Congested Roadways are becoming a bigger problem: • Commute AM and PM Peak periods are growing longer in duration • LOS on Major Arterials during these peak periods is degrading • Delay experienced by the commuting public is growing • Backups on high speed arterials or on signalized corridors increase chances for rear end collisions Existing Level of Service Map Spokane Valley Euclid Mon onery Mansfield vawy Micsinn a Melly Lake pua le9wa'N LL 4 4Ih ! 8th „°, 33 w 181h e /f 6/z./f/ Spokenee Valley Level of Service Municipa I LOundarie5 DSn.,k�ne'J:,Iey j Sookk,,e✓d I',[v Urban Growth Area (1-tGA) Park . M.fl,'CrliOn h Vpen Space U. 241 Existing LOS LOS A-E LO5 L05E �1o5 rwwww 03+s wnw�„ 0.5 1 3 Mips Multi -Modal Development - Transit - Bicycle - Pedestrian - Ferries Commute Trip Reduction. Managed Lanes High Occupancy Vehicle Tolled Bus on Shoulder '.... Tolling '.. Integrated Multimodal '.. Scheduling and Fare '.... Collections Systems There are two options to consider: • Build More Capacity OR • Maximize the Efficiency of Existing Infrastructure ITS IMPROVEMENTS Traveler Information Ramp Metering Traffic Incident Management Wrong -way Driver Notifications Incident Response Traffic Management Centers Work Zone Management - Traveler Information - Coordination Among Zones - Policy Development Adaptive Signals Intersection Conflict Warning Systems TSMO Managing safety and capacity as an asset. TRAVEL DEMAND MANAGEMENT COOPERATIVE AUTOMATED TRANSPORTATION Traffic Signal Communications to Vehicles Truck Platooning Autonomous Truck Mounted Attenuators Work Zone Warning and Management Tolling Vehicle Occupancy Detection Rest Area Truck Parking Applications Winter Operations and Rural Traveler Information Machine Readable Signing and Striping TRADITIONAL TRAFFIC OPERATIONS Access Management Signal Operations/ Optimization Safety Analysis) Countermeasures Signage Striping Minor Geometric Enhancements - Channeilzatlon - Turn lanes - Compact Roundabouts PLANNING, PARTNERING, AND POLICY DEVELOPMENT Land Use Planning Utilization of Regional Roadway Network. Policy Implementation Agreement Development Data Sharing Joint Corridor Planning Groundwork Complete... Region Wide ITS Infrastructure wx I 1 at MINCE ITS Device Locations - Spokane, WA Appoxlmately 70 Mlles of IN OPERATION Fiber currently in service. MOOT Chi T .®I •. • EI! IN OPERATION£ WAWA ASE M.1 i n. SSD AcE, Ic° IE FUTURE (FUNDED) COS leen IN OPERATION WSDOT 0 !PLANNED FIBER TEDSV p03v EA .1 CS TrOPESIS . � .. _.Nx07 EMPTY ,in.V - COSY EbYEA00 ;COSY L71p1: COS, _ -,SY FIBER sm. vE COSY IN OPERATION r, WSDOT cv_v a ELnTr N OPERATION WSDOT SCALE IN FEET IT LI 4909 8900 EMPTY COS,/ 114 OPERATION WSDOT IIMSS SO. LI ARO DI LEGEND ITKI .re.exe City of Spokane Valley ITS System Map ITS Infrastructure • • • • • • • • . • • • • • LEGEND FIBER CONDUIT EMPTY CONDUIT PLANNED 2018 CON011fT & FIBER PROPOSED CONDUIT B FIBER RA010 PLANNED RADIO SPOKANE VALLEY SIGNALS WSDOT SIGNALS STOP FLASHERS Cc1v PLANNED CAMERA DYNAMIC MESSAGE SIGN CITY BUILDINGS • -f- 1711 IDMS Drown By. MN Data em 0Il pes gree By Doie: SCALE HORIZONTAL + - 4ERTICAL1 x/• ��+• H 11 111y LIo n 1 r * II II +:.rk0 11J E fl Ell 'lite 106 SF .:I A8E v::LLE7. •:,'J9:16 SPOKANE VALLEY PRO -,ECT No. City of Spokane Valley ITS Infrostrueture SHEET 1 04 1 6 RTM is the Solution Now... Providing Information to the Public for Better Travel Choices and Efficient Use of Existing Infrastructure by Managing Incidents, Construction, Weather Events and More for All Agency Partners SRTMC 1 Spokane Regional Trensportatian Management Center Help F e O 0 Aleway HeIgen • Ind SRTMC ...and in the Future 1-90 Operations Study Projects: • Ramp Metering System • Wrong Way Notification System • Queue/Merge Warning System 1-90 Ramp Metering E6 !1S 195 (nnrfgsrvnrxv: X-Iane(tetroflt) VOL.& aahvse h erhn2- gee rnl000es ferVirtOM AVMS): 570 h (2 lanes) re 1400 Mn. rcCe re 6essee' ram eLening.- 1250 EB Walnut craeywnrinn 2 -lane SexlatIng} Vo1irere Reiner, iandern green physes PYl07 7445,.pragp kn7r. fnu1L-YieJ- 3 50 ft (2 lanes) 1100 RAVE. exeet, avoid rompriveuh4 1450 WB BrownefDivision [anFquroGcn 5Ingle-lane VetadeFie�;e Iwo vehicles pergreen P.vaaNe fmw6v 500 R (5 lane} Max 7xxy ram lervcrnl. 1200 4tn..rore rampwP2. 1000 CarAwraeipn ven0eRdease rx:nxa. ApaVadesrcruye M..yfb( o�hnry. 2 -lane {existing) Tandcfn green pila0e5 760M2 lanes) hWx.towl$' erre 14611110,, 1700 61,n mato ami MTVQreufnq: 1600 EB Browne/Division Ca,rjaieorc� 2 -lane (resat) 12NeeRD:ea- aSernea�' Akerna tq greeny Pmakrble swage 1500 Se{lanes) .sax terry 1400 Atx. rare tuned mmp queuing. 1050 EB Hamilton Wrong Way Notification System blare Crash dna fiam 2611-2615 Mavis) included n analyrsts- • - Fatal ar Severe 'Ivy Crash • - Minor Injury or Novelty Damage Only:PL:Ci: Crash 01 KS Wrong Way Notification System Benefit Cost Analysis ITS & Target Zero... • ITS is a key component in getting • And a step towards... to zero serious & fatal incidents ACCIDENT AHEAD REDUCE SPEED EXIT T 2 CLOSED 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 Photo Source: LAT SRTMC Objectives o Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) Architecture Implementation o Regional Data Archival for System Planning and Performance Reporting o Coordinated Incident & Congestion Management o ITS Infrastructure Support & Priority Planning o Financial Stewardship & Funding Options o Action Plan Development for Expected and Unexpected Events o Regional Signal Coordination 36% SRTMC Funding FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to Current Expenditures: WSDOT Funding = $393,571 30% M & O Grant Funding = $426,148 Equipment Grant Funding = $458,332 *Partner Funds = $8,414 WSDOT Funded Partner Funded 33% M & 0 Grant Funded Equipment Grant Total SRTMC Expenditures $1,286,465 SRTMC Maintenance & Operations is funded by Grants through June 2023 *Partner funds ($15,000 per agency = $60,000/yr) have not been collected for three years. Collection of partner funds anticipated to resume in 2019. SRTMC Current Business o Complete ATMS (Advanced Traffic Management Software) Testing o Arterial Data Gathering — Travel Speeds & Travel Time Data o First Responder TIM (Traffic Incident Management) Training o ITS Architecture Plan & Project Update o 2019 Work Plan & Budget o Integration of Maxview with iNET ATMS Spokane Valley Next Steps o Implement priority projects identified in the 2011 ITS Strategic Plan to install or update fiber optic systems along: > MuIlan Rd from Appleway Blvd to Mission Ave, > Sprague/Appleway from Sullivan to Barker, and > Increase fiber capacity along Sullivan from Mission to Indiana o Update the City's 2011 ITS Strategic Plan that will identify the City's current priorities and how future projects can be coordinated within the regional system o Continue to be an active partner with the SRTMC Questions? CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: 6/19/2018 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ® admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: BNSF 2nd Mainline Track — Project Update GOVERNING LEGISLATION: None PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: None BACKGROUND: In 2018 and 2019, the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad (BNSF) is undertaking a rail expansion project that was initially planned for a 2025 timeframe. Current business practices and favorable railroad market conditions have them completing the work at this time. The project, the "Otis Orchards to Irvin Double Track Project," entails the planning, design, and construction of a second mainline track from just east of Barker Road to just west of Pines Road (SR -27) in Spokane Valley. In general, the project includes 4.4 miles of mainline track parallel to the existing track as well as modifications to existing public road crossings, existing railroad communication infrastructure, existing railroad structures, and the construction of a new railroad bridge over the Spokane River. The Double Track Project will have a direct impact on five public road crossings, four at -grade crossings and one grade -separated crossing. The at -grade crossings include Barker Road, Flora Road, Evergreen Road, and Pines Road and the grade -separated crossing at Sullivan Road. Over the last several months, City staff have been coordinating with BNSF on their project approach to minimize the impacts to the City, its residents, and the traveling public during construction. To assist with the coordination and review of the BNSF project, the City has retained professional consulting engineering and legal services. OPTIONS: Discussion Only RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Discussion Only BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Unknown at this time. STAFF CONTACT: Bill Helbig, City Engineer ATTACHMENTS: PowerPoint Presentation; a few federal laws applicable to railroads BNSF 2"d Mainline Track Bill Helbig, PE, City Engineer 2 Project Description June 19, 2018 Otis Orchards to Irvin Double Track Project Second Mainline Track, Parallel to Existing Track 4.4 Miles Long Modifications at Existing Road Crossings Modifications to Existing Railroad Communication Infrastructure Modifications to Existing Railroad Structures (i.e. Retaining Walls, Culverts, etc.) Construction of New Railroad Bridge Over Spokane River BNSF Project Schedule 2018 Design and Permitting 2019 Construction Project Location June 19, 2018 Wellesley Ave. 271d_&ah line Track VPN '� 54 - II mgr 3 Evergreen Rd. & Flora Rd. Crossings June 19, 2018 2nd Mainline 35 Feet North of Existing (2) 1 -Day Closures for Construction 4 BNSF will Coordinate with Kaiser 2nd Mainline 20 Feet South of Existing (2) 1 -Day Closures for Construction Barker Road Crossing June 19, 2018 2nd Mainline 17 Feet South of Existing (3) 1 -Day Closures for Construction Future Expansion to South Coordinating with Grade Separation Project 5 Spoka e _ Valley Sullivan Road Crossing June 19, 2018 Use Existing Spur as 2nd Mainline Track New Spur 115 Feet South of Mainline Tracks New Bridge over Spur New Bridge in Existing Roadway Fill Area Closures of Sullivan (Currently Undetermined) Future Expansion Will Require New Bridges 6 Spokane i0Valley Pines Road Crossing June 19, 2018 2nd Mainline Location Undetermined Location Dependent Upon Bridge over River Future Expansion Undetermined Coordinating with Grade Separation Project Requires WSDOT Coordination Closures of Pines Road Undetermined 7 Spokane .000 Valley Current Status June 19, 2018 BNSF Project Status Project Currently in Design Environmental Review (State Environmental Policy Act) Lead Agency — Washington State Department of Ecology 2 Phase Approach — Geotechnical Investigations & Project Construction Construction in 2019 City Project Status 4 City/BNSF Coordination Meetings to Date Engineering Consultant Acquired for Project Reviews — HDR Engineering Legal Consultant Acquired for Project Coordination — Fletcher & Sippel 8 Spokane .000 Valley Questions June 19, 2018 9 The Interstate Commerce Commission Termination Act of 1995 (Act) preempts most pre -construction permit requirements imposed by states and localities if those requirements could result in a disruption to operations (interstate commerce) of a common carrier over any part of the interstate rail network'. The term common carrier is not defined in the Act but is defined by common law and agency precedent. A railroad that is a common carrier provides service to any and all shippers along the line that request service or may want service in the future2. Common carriers are subject to the Surface Transportation Board (STB) regulations and thus the Act. Common carriers include both main lines and branch lines (i.e. those lines that serve shippers in rural communities). 149 use 10102(5) and 10501(a)(2) 249 USC 11101(a) Chapter 33 The Federal Laws Applicable to Railroads 33-100 Introduction Congress and the courts long have recognized a need to regulate railroad operations at the federal level City of Auburn v. United States, 154 F.3d 1025 (9th Cir. 1998), A number of federal laws are controlling, but three commonly found to preempt state and local attempts to regulate railroad activities are the Interstate Commerce Commission Termination Act of 1995, the Federal Railroad Safety Act of 1970, and the Noise Control Act of 1972. The state and local issues examined in this section are limited to those that are primarily related to land use. The general principal arising from the statutory and case law is that, if a railroad is engaged in transportation -related activities, federal law will preempt state and local attempts to regulate. 33-200 The Interstate Commerce Commission Termination Act of 1995 The Interstate Commerce Commission Termination Act of 1995 ("ICCTA") (49 U.S.C.A. §10101 et seq) abolished the Interstate Commerce Commission and gave the Surface Transportation Board exclusive jurisdiction over: (1) transportation by rail carriers and the remedies provided with respect to rates, classifications, rules (including car service, interchange, and other operating rules), practices, routes, services, and facilities of such carriers; and (2) the construction, acquisition, operation, abandonment, or discontinuance of spur, industrial, team, switching, or side tracks, or facilities, even if the tracks are located, or intended to be located, entirely in one state. 4.9 U.S.0 j 10501(b). The ICCTA preempts state and local rrguulatiort, i.e., "those state laws that may reasonably be said to have the effect oF `managing' or `governing' rail transportation." Norfolk Southern Railway Company o. Cill /' Ile.�nrrd�za, 608 F.3d 150, 157--158 (4ih Cir. 2010) (city ordinance regulating the transportation of bulk materials, including ethanol, and city permit unilaterally issued to the railroad under the ordinance regulating the transport of ethanol to the railroad's transload facility, was preempted by the ICCTA). Thus, the ICCTA preempts the state and local regulation of matters directly regulated by the Surface Transportation Board, such as the construction, operation, and abandonment of rail lines. Emerson t Kansas City S. Ry. Co., 503 F.3d 1126 (10th Cir. 2007); F,iberg U. Kansas City S. Ry. Co., 267 F.3d 439 (5th Cir. 2001). Whether a state or local regulation is preempted requires a factual assessment of whether the action would have the effect of preventing or unreasonably interfering with railroad transportation. Emerson, supra. Following is a summary of state and local permitting or preclearance requirements preempted by the ICCTA because, by their nature, they could be used to deny a railroad the ability to perform part of its operations or to proceed with activities authorized by the Surface Transportation Board (collected in Emerson, supra): • Preconstruction permitting of a transload facility. Green Mountain R.R. Corp. v. Vermont, 404 F.3d 638 (2d Cit. 2005). • Environmental and land use permitting. City ofAuburn y United States, 154 F.3d 1025 (9th Cir. 1998). • The demolition permitting process. Soo Line R.R. Co. u. City ofMinneapolis, 38 F. Supp. 2d 1096 (D.Minn. 1998). • Requirement that railroad companies obtain state approval before discontinuing station agents, abandoning rail lines, or removing side tracks or spurs. Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corp. U. Anderson, 959 F. Supp. 1288 (D.Mont. 1997). Following is a summary of areas of state and local regulations directly regulated by the Surface Transportation Board and, therefore, ate preempted by the ICCTA (collected in Emerson, supra): 33-1 The Albemarle County Land Use Law Handbook March 2012 • State statutes regulating railroad operations. Friberg v. Kansas City S. Ry. Co., 267 F.3d 439 (5th Cir. 2001) (state and local regulations such as those attempting to limit the duration that crossings are blocked are operational requirements and are preempted); RR I/entams, Inc v. Surface Transportation Baan, 299 F.3d 523 (6th Cir. 2002) (state statute regulating railroad operations preempted); CSX 1 insportation, Inc. v. City of Plymouth, 283 F.3d 812 (6t1 Cir. 2002) (holding that state law imposing limitation on duration at which crossing may be blocked by train, which is related to train speed, was preempted). • State statutes regulating contracts between rail carriers. San Luis Cent. RR. Co. v. Spins Terminal Ry. Co., 369 F. Supp. 2d 172 (D.Mass. 2005) (contract between rail carriers concerning use of railroad cars and payment rates preempted in light of other ICCTA provisions regulating those issues). • Attempts to condemn railroad tracks or nearby and. City ofLincaln v. Saaface Transportation Board, 414 F.3d 858 (8th Cir. 2005) (attempt to use eminent domain to acquire portion of property abutting a rail line for municipal bicycle trail preempted); Wis. Ont. Ltd. V. City ofMar:rlfeld, 160 F. Supp. 2d 1009 (W.D.Wis. 2000) (attempt to use state's condemnation statute to condemn an actively used railroad track preempted). • State negligence and nuisance claims. Fribetg, supra (state claims of negligence and neg igence per se concerning a railroad's alleged blockages of road leading to plaintiffs business were preempted); Rztshin, n. KansasCity S. Ry. Co., 194 F. Supp. 2d 493 (S.D.Miss. 2001) (state law nuisance and negligence claims that would interfere with operation of railroad switchyard preempted), Following is a summary of state and local activities not preempted by the ICCTA: • Voluntary agreements entered into by the railroad. PCS Phosphate Co. v. Norfolk Southern Corp., 559 F.3d 212, 221 (4«' Cir. 2009) (quoting the Surface Transportation Board that "voluntary agreements may be seen as reflecting the carrier's own determination and admission that the agreements would not unreasonably interfere with interstate commerce," though this rule is not absolute). • Traditional police powers over the development of railroad property such as electrical, plumbing and fire codes, at least to the extent that the regulations protect the public health and safety, are settled and defined, and can be obeyed with reasonable certainty, entail no extended or open-ended delays, and can be approved or rejected without the exercise of discretion on subjective questions. Green .A4ountain RR Corp. v. Vetmont, 404 F.3d 638 (2d Cir. 2005). The regulations may not discriminate against rail carriers or unreasonably burden rail carriage. Southern Norfolk, sora. • Zoning regulations applied to railroad -owned land used for non -railroad purposes by a third party. Flotilla East Coast Railway Comp®, v. City of Vest Palm Beach, 266 F.3d 1324 (11 a' Cir. 2001). • Miscellaneous laws and acts determined to not have anything to do with transportation. Emerson, surra (summary judgment for railroad was reversed because the railroad's acts of depositing old railroad ties and other debris into a drainage ditch abutting plaintiff's property, which allegedly caused the flooding of plaintiffs' property, were not preempted because they had nothing to do with transportation); Hi Tech Trans, LLC v. NewJersey, 382 F.3d 295 (3td Cir. 2004) (state regulation of solid waste disposal facility serving railroad was not preempted). • State statute requiring railroads to pay for pedestrian crossings across railroad tracks. Adrian & Blisefield R.R. a Village ofBlissfield, 550 F.3d 533 (6th Cir. 2008) (determined not to be preempted by the ICCTA). 33-300 The Federal Railroad Safety Act of 1970 Issues regarding state and local regulation of train speed and the duration rIiat railroad crossings are blocked are also considered under the Federal Railroad Safety Act of 1970 ("FRSA"). Tirc l itS.,1 contemplates a comprehensive and uniform set of safety regulations in all areas of railroad operations. Chicap 7 izw, ! ; dnthority v. Floln•, 570 F.2d 1305 (7th Cir. 1977). The purpose of the FRSA is to "promote safety in evety area of railroad operations and reduce 33-2 The Albemarle County Land Use Law 1 -landbook 34farch 2012 railroad --related accidents and incidents." 49 U.S.0 If 20101. The FRSA includes a preemption provision that, among other things, allows state and local governments to regulate only those matters on which the Secretary of Transportation has not yet regulated. The Secretary regulates train speeds, which depend on the classification of the tracks. CSX Transportation, Inc. v. Cite of 1)/pm/rib, 283 F.3d 812 (6th Cir. 2002) (holding that state late imposing a limitation on the duration at which a crossing may be blocked by a train, which is related to train speed, was preempted); see also CSX Transportation, Inc. P. City of Mitchell, 105 F. Supp. 2c1 949 (S.D.Ind. 1999) (granting summary judgment to railroad and enjoining city from enforcing law prohibiting railroad from blocking crossing for more than 10 minutes); Driesora v. Iowa, Chicago &Eastern Railroad Corporation, 777 F. Supp. 2d 1143 (N.D. Iowa 2011) (partial summary judgment for railroad; federal regulations governing the movement of trains, including blocked crossings as they pertained to air brake testing requirements, preempted state and local laws). In Plymoarth, the attorney general argued that the crux of the state statute was not train speed, but "the time that trains may block highway traffic." The court of appeals was unpersuaded by this contention, explaining that "the amount of time a moving train spends at a grade crossing is mathematically a function of the length of the train and the speed at which the train is traveling." The court concluded that the statute would require the railroad to modify either the speed at which its trains travel or their length, and would also restrict the railroad's performance of federally mandated air brake tests. The court also concluded that numerous federal regulations covered the speed at which trains may travel and, thus, the federal regulations "substantially subsume the subject matter of the relevant state law." Plymouth, 283 F. 3d at 817. Congress intended that the ICCTA and the FRSA coexist. While the Surface Transportation Board must adhere to federal policies encouraging "safe and suitable working conditions in the railroad industry," the ]CCTA and its legislative history contain no evidence that Congress intended for the Surface Transportation Board to supplant the Federal Railroad Administration's authority over rail safety under the FRSA. Tyrrell v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co., 248 F.3d 517 (6th Cir. 2001). Rather, the agencies' complementary exercise of their statutory authority accurately reflects Congress's intent for the ICCTA and the FRSA to be construed in pari materia.Tyrell, supra. 33-400 The Noise Control Act of 1972 Issues regarding state and local regulation of train noise are evaluated under the Noise Control Act of 1972 ("NCA"), which establishes the maximum noise levels for rail cars engaged in interstate commerce. The preemption provision under the NCA has been described as being "decidedly narrow." Rushing v. Kansas City Soultherw Ry. Co., 185 F.3d 496 (5a' Cir. 1999). Many cases in this area ate based on state nuisance claims brought by abutting landowners. Generally, if the noise generated by the train has a transportation purpose and is within the NCA's noise limits, state and local regulation is preempted. Rushing, supra (holding that a triable issue of fact existed based on the plaintiffs' lay opinion that the railroad's expert's opinion regarding compliance was based on sound measurements which did not reflect the true sound level plaintiffs typically heard); Jones v. Union Pacific RR, 79 Cal.App.4th 793 (2000) (holding that plaintiffs nuisance claim could proceed against the railroad for excessive idling and horn blowing near plaintiff's home because plaintiff had adequately alleged that these activities did not have a transportation purpose but were, instead, done solely to harass the plaintiff). 33-3 The Albemarle County Land Use Law Handbook March 2012 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: 6/19/2018 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ® admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: 22nd Avenue Traffic Briefing GOVERNING LEGISLATION: None PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: None BACKGROUND: Over the last ten months, residents along East 22nd Avenue have been concerned about the increase in speed and traffic volume on their roadway. In response to their concerns, City staff has evaluated the conditions and reported those findings back to the residents. East 22nd Avenue is located in the southeast area of the City, adjacent to the city/county border. This area of the City, platted as Ridgemont Estates, was developed in the mid 1970's and was considered the outskirts of county development. On July 18, 2013, Spokane County expanded the urban growth area (UGA) to the east and south of Ridgemont Estates and the area was quickly platted. With the recent economic surge in the region over the last few years, the newly platted UGA is being developed. This new development has increased traffic in the existing neighborhoods, causing the concern of the 22nd Avenue residents. Beginning in 2017, a developer came to the City to begin the approval process for building a 226 home subdivision named the Vistas at Belleaire. The new subdivision will reside inside the City, within a parcel just north of the south City limits, located east and north of Ridgemont Estates. The development has the potential to add to the already growing traffic on the City's roadways, which includes the County's rapid residential growth between Sullivan and Barker Roads. Since beginning the permitting process, the Ridgemont Estates residents have been active to insure that this new growth will have minimal traffic impacts on their streets. The residents of the area have written numerous emails and made several phone calls expressing their traffic concerns. They fear that if the City were to allow the new Vistas at Belleaire subdivision to move forward, along with the continued County development in the area, their lifestyle will be significantly impacted as a result of traffic congestion. First, the neighborhood is concerned about safety due to the speeds on the roadway and the lack of pedestrian facilities. Second, they are concerned about the increase in traffic volumes and its impacts on existing residential roadway facilities. Finally, they are concerned that their residential roadway is not suited for the increase in traffic from a design standpoint. Brainstorming by the residents has resulted in their requests for various measures including the installation of speed bumps/humps, stop controlled intersections, and traffic restrictions to their neig hborhood. Over the last 10 months, the City has coordinated efforts with the neighborhood and evaluated traffic in the area and has reached several conclusions: • A Traffic and Speed Study conducted in November 2017 indicates that traffic volumes and speeds fall within established standards for the residential roadway. • New development within the UGA may increase traffic in the neighborhood by approximately 20%. • Installation of stop -controlled intersections is not warranted by the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD). Two traffic mitigation measures that have the potential for managing traffic in the area include the use of radar speed signs and placing truck restrictions on the roadways. These measures, which are relatively inexpensive, have been used in other areas of the City. OPTIONS: Discussion Only RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Consensus on moving forward with the two above- mentioned mitigation measures. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Final impact yet to be determined. STAFF CONTACT: Bill Helbig, PE, City Engineer Ray Wright, PE, Sr. Engineer, Traffic ATTACHMENTS: 22nd Avenue Traffic and Speed Study Presentation jUalley Memorandum Public Works Department Traffic Engineering 11707 E Sprague Ave Suite 106 • Spokane Valley WA 99206 509.921.1000 ♦ Fax: 509.921.1008 ♦ cityhall@spokanevalley.org To: Ryan Kipp From: Jerremy Clark CC: Date: 11/28/2017 Re: Engineering and Traffic Survey / Speed Study Summary INTRODUCTION This Engineering and Traffic Survey for the City of Spokane Valley was conducted to evaluate the existing speeds along the roadway segment of 22nd Avenue between Vera Crest Drive and Conklin Road (approximately 1/4 mile). PREVAILING SPEEDS Posted speed limits are primarily established to protect the general public from unreasonable behavior of reckless, unreliable, or otherwise dangerous drivers. The majority of drivers comply with the basic speed law (RCW 46.61.400) and maximum limits. These posted limits provide law enforcement with the means to identify and cite those that violate what is accepted by the majority. RCW 46.61.400 states that, "no person shall drive a vehicle on a (highway) at a speed greater than is reasonable and prudent under the conditions and having regard to the actual and potential hazards then existing. In every event speed shall be so controlled as may be necessary to avoid colliding with any person, vehicle or other conveyance on or entering the highway in compliance with legal requirements and the duty of all persons to use due care." Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 468-95-045 lists several criteria for consideration when establishing the speed limit, including: 85th percentile speed, roadway characteristics, pace speed, and roadside development and environment. The speed limit is generally set at the nearest 5 mph increment at or below the 85th percentile. This document summarizes the evaluation of the existing speeds along 22nd Avenue with consideration of the criteria referenced above. STUDY AREA 22nd Avenue is a two-lane local roadway. There currently is no posted speed limit along this segment; as such, the legal speed limit is 25 mph in this residential area. The study area limits are illustrated in the figure below. Table 1 summarizes the study roadway segment. 2..''nd Avtr: F Y Qv'tr: E 24rh Awe ONE'°0 E 221v ` AvA. }b a�,ti q,c E Saill�gp y Bible Church 0 F Qv fl 51 0 J � 't; s4 22"Avenue as 5 pa E32:,c:Awv HeIdi's F051-110[1 Design Q f::z7nd AYE' Figure 1. Vicinity Map Image Courtesy of googleTM Table 1. Study Roadway Segments Galaxy Ln r: Segment Limits Length (miles)(mph) ADT Posted Speed Limit Presence of Bicycle Lanes? Presence of Sidewalk or Curb* Average Pavement Width Driveways per Mile Vera Crest Drive to Conklin Road 0.25 1,643 None No 100% 36 68 *: Sidewalk/Curb is based on Spokane County Scout Map measurements As summarized in Table 1, the segment of 22th Avenue between Vera Crest Drive and Conklin Road is curbed with no sidewalk or bicycle lanes. The intersections of 22nd Avenue at Vera Crest Drive, 22nd Avenue at Conklin Court and 22nd Avenue at Conklin Road are T -intersections currently with no traffic control. 2/5 DATA COLLECTION An Engineering and Traffic Survey form was prepared for the segment shown in Table 1. Significant measures reported in the Engineering and Traffic Survey are summarized below: • The 50th percentile is the median speed of the observed data set. The 50th percentile speed represents the speed at which half of the observed vehicles are below and half of the observed vehicles are above. The 50th percentile of speed represents the average speed of the traffic stream. The critical speed, or 85th percentile speed, is the speed at or below which 85 percent of the traffic is moving. This speed is the primary guide in determining the voluntary compliance of the greater majority of drivers. A speed limit set higher than the critical speed is not considered reasonable and safe. Speed limits set a great deal lower than the critical speed would not elicit respect from the public. The 10 mph Pace is the 10 mph range of speed which contains the most vehicles. It is a measure of the dispersion of speeds within the samples surveyed. This 10 mph range is that which contains the greatest number of speed measurements. The established speed limit is typically within the 10 mph Pace. An Outlier is any value that is numerically distant from most of the other data points in a set of data. In the case of vehicle speed studies, an outlier indicates a speed that is significantly different than the typical speeds on the roadway. For this analysis, 24-hour tube counts were conducted at a location along 22nd Avenue between Vera Crest Drive and Conklin Road during the week of October 9th to October 13th, 2017 to obtain prevailing speeds in the study area. As shown in Figure 2, the tubes were set just west of Carmine Court. Traffic in both directions was recorded during the survey period. To ensure capture of free flow speed, the specific location of measurement of the segment was selected after considering the following: • Minimal stop sign / traffic signal influence • Avoid influence of curvature or other • Little to no visibility restrictions roadway conditions that may affect the • Uncongested traffic flow normal operations of a vehicle Tube Counters Figure 2. Counting Device Location 3/5 SPEED STUDY RESULTS This section provides a summary of the results of the speed survey along roadway segment of 22nd Avenue between Vera Crest Drive and Conklin Road. A 3 -day average during the typical weekdays of Tuesday, Wednesday, and Thursday was calculated as part of this analysis. There were speeds measured for 3,926 vehicles in both directions. The 50th percentile speeds are shown in Figure 3. The 50th percentile speed is the speed at or below which 50% of the drivers are traveling. As shown in Figure 3, the 50th percentile speed along the segment of 22nd Avenue, between Conklin Road and Vera Crest Drive is approximately 26 mph. 29 26 2 a 23 20 50th Percentile Speeds - 3 -Day Average EB WB Vera Crest to Conklin 22ND AVENUE - WEEKDAY 24 HOUR TUBE COUNT Figure 3. 50th Percentile Speeds The 85th percentile speeds resulting from the speed survey are shown in Figure 4. The 85th percentile speed is the primary guide in determining the voluntary compliance of the greater majority of drivers. This level indicates that 85% of the drivers on the road are driving at or below the resultant speed. As shown in Figure 4, the 85th percentile speed along the segment of 22nd Avenue, between Conklin Road and Vera Crest Drive is just below 30 mph. 34 223 25 85th Percentile Speeds - 3 -Day Average EB WB Vera Crest to Conklin 22ND AVENUE - WEEKDAY 24 HOUR TUBE COUNT Figure 4. 85th Percentile Speeds 4/5 As previously stated, an established speed limit is typically within the 10 mph pace. As shown in Figure 5, the 10 mph pace for each direction is typically between 21 mph and 31 mph. The 85th percentile speed is near the upper limit of the 10 mph pace for each day of the study. Across the three day period, approximately 80% of the vehicle speeds measured fell within the 10 mph pace. An additional measure of speed compliance is how many outliers were observed. During the three day study period, there were 54 vehicles identified exceeding 35 mph; six (6) of which were exceeding 45 mph and three (3) were further shown to exceed 55 mph. This equates to less than 2% of vehicles exceeding 35 mph out of the 3,926 measured speeds, with less than 0.2% exceeding 45 mph. 10 MPH Pace and 3n 32. .30 28 26 24 22 85th Percentile Speeds T 20 EB 'Tuesday VVectnes! Figure 5. lOmph Pace SUMMARY AND DISCUSSION Based on the data collected and evaluated for this study, the measured speeds were used to determine if speeding is an issue on this segment and, if so, determine recommended measures to reduce speeding. As shown in Table 2 the measured 50th percentile speeds and 85th percentile speeds on 22nd Avenue between Conklin Road and Vera Crest Drive are 1 mph and 5 mph above the default 25 mph speed limit, respectively. Table 2. Speed Survey Results Segment 9 Speed Limit 50th Percentile Speed 85th Percentile Speed EB WB EB WB Vera Crest Drive to Conklin Road 25 MPH 26.1 26 29.9 29.6 As summarized in Table 2, it is interesting to note that the uphill speed (eastbound) is nearly identical to the downhill speed (westbound). It was expected that the downhill speeds would be higher and possibly excessive. This result is likely due to the location of the count, which was approximately 2/3 of the distance up the hill (see Figure 2). This location allows less distance for downhill vehicles to accelerate and more distance for the uphill vehicles to gain speed. This segment of 22nd Avenue has a paved width of 36 feet, which, with on -street parking, potentially reduces the travelled way to a 20 -foot width. Combined with the residential nature of the roadway and horizontal curvature, excessive speeding is not expected to increase over time. However, based on feedback from a resident, the developing area to the west of Conklin Road uses this street as a cut -through to Sullivan Road to avoid Saltese Road. As development continues in this area, much of the "new" traffic is likely to use 22nd to Vera Crest as a short cut to Sullivan. As a result, the volumes will likely continue to increase on this segment. Over time, this increase in volumes will increase the perception of congestion on the residential roadways in the area and may necessitate future monitoring. 5/5 ay Wright, PE, Senior Traffic Engineer Location June 19, 2018 Southeast Area of City Urban Growth Area (UGA) Expansion 90% of UGA Expansion Platted Vistas at Bellaire within City Traffic Contribution to 22nd Avenue 2 Vistas at Bellaire Ridgemont Neighborhood June 19, 2018 Neighborhood Concerns Safety Traffic Speeds No Pedestrian Facilities Traffic Volume Increase New Developments Existing Residents Road Design Road Grades Pavement Design 3 Vistas at Bellaire Neighborhood Ideas June 19, 2018 Safety Radar Speed Signs Stop Control Intersections Utilize Speed Bumps/Humps Continued Enforcement Construct Sidewalks Traffic Volume Increase Restrict Access to Area Road Design Restrict Access to Area Neighborhood Proposed StopSign &/or Speed Hump p �' 11nr i ave >�.• E 23rd -Ave Neighborhood Coordination June 19, 2018 Multiple E -Mail Correspondences Neighborhood Meeting 16 Attended Gathering of Information Exchange of Ideas Documentation Exchanged Individual Discussions 5 City Investigations June 19, 2018 Traffic / Speed Study (Fall 2017) — 22nd Avenue Actual Speeds Fall within Established Standards Average Daily Traffic (ADT) of 1,300 Traffic Mitigation Studies — New Development Anticipated Traffic Increase Approximately 20% Stop Sign Installation Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) — National & City Standard Signs Not Warranted for 22nd Avenue Speed Bumps / Humps City Practices Preclude Use Road Maintenance / Snow Removal Concerns Spokane 6 No Documented Speed Issues to Mitigate .000 Valley City Investigations June 19, 2018 Radar Speed Signs Studies Support Effectiveness in Reducing Speeds Vistas at Bellaire — Traffic Mitigation Requires 2 Signs Location of Signs — Yet to be Determined Vehicle Restrictions Decrease Construction Traffic City Currently has "No Trucks" Sign Ordinance Location of Signs — Yet to be Determined 7 Vistas at Bellaire 8 Questions June 19, 2018 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: June 19, 2018 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ® admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Administrative report — repeal of chapter 2.45 SVMC — Department of Public Safety. GOVERNING LEGISLATION: Chapter 2.45 SVMC. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Adoption of chapter 2.45 SVMC through adoption of Ordinance 03-069 in 2003, shortly after incorporation. BACKGROUND: Shortly after we incorporated, the City Council adopted chapter 2.45 SVMC, creating the Department of Public Safety. It was believed at that time that the City should have such a department to coordinate the various public safety functions that would be provided by outside entities, such as fire, public health, and law enforcement. In reality, each organization that provides public safety related services (police, fire and health district) are separate municipal entities with their own elected or appointed leadership over whom the City has no legal control, excepting of course contracted law enforcement services provided by the Spokane County Sheriff. Because the City has never had a "Department of Public Safety," because the City has no legal control over these other entities, and because the City Manager communicates on an as -needed basis with all such entities affecting the health and safety of our citizens, there is no need for such an entity in the City. Staff is recommending this chapter be repealed in its entirety because it is not being used, and its existence and stated function has caused confusion with prior Councilmembers. OPTIONS: (1) Place on a future agenda for an ordinance first reading; or (2) take other action as appropriate. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Consensus to place on a future agenda for an ordinance first reading. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: None. STAFF CONTACT: Cary Driskell, City Attorney ATTACHMENTS: Draft Ordinance repealing chapter 2.45 SVMC. DRAFT CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 18-0** AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON, REPEALING CHAPTER 2.45 SPOKANE VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, AND OTHER MATTERS RELATING THERETO. WHEREAS, the City originally adopted chapter 2.45 SVMC, Department of Public Safety, in 2003 with the belief it was necessary for the proper oversight and communication between the City Manager and the various third party entities providing public safety services in the City; and WHEREAS, the City has never utilized chapter 2.45 SVMC since it was adopted; and WHEREAS, the City Manager communicates on an as -needed basis with the Police Chief, the Fire Chief from District 8, the Fire Chief from District 1 (Spokane Valley Fire), the Spokane Regional Health District, as well as other regional participants in the provision of public safety, all for the betterment and protection of our citizens; and WHEREAS, each of these outside organizations that provides public safety related services are separate municipal entities with their own elected or appointed leadership over whom the City has no legal control, with the exception of contracted law enforcement services provided by the Spokane County Sheriff. Because the City has never had a Department of Public Safety, because the City has no legal control over these other entities, and because the City Manager communicates on an as -needed basis with all such entities affecting the health and safety of our citizens, there is no need for such an entity in the City; and WHEREAS, the presence of chapter 2.45 SVMC has created confusion for some citizens regarding what its role is and should be, and repealing this chapter of the SVMC will remove that confusion. NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley, Spokane County, Washington, ordains as follows: Section 1. Purpose. The purpose and intent of this Ordinance is to repeal chapter 2.45 SVMC because it is unnecessary for protecting the public in times of emergency, and its existence creates confusion regarding how it should be utilized. Section 2. Repeal. Chapter 2.45 Spokane Valley Municipal Code is hereby repealed in its entirety. Section 3. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance shall be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause, or phrase in this Ordinance. Section 4. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect five days after publication of this Ordinance or a summary thereof in the official newspaper of the City of Spokane Valley as provided by law. Ordinance 18-0** Repealing chapter 2.45 SVMC — Department of Public Safety Page 1 of 2 DRAFT Passed by the City Council this day of , 2018. City of Spokane Valley ATTEST: L.R. Higgins, Mayor Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Approved as to Form: Office of the City Attorney Date of Publication: Effective Date: Ordinance 18-0** Repealing chapter 2.45 SVMC — Department of Public Safety Page 2 of 2 DRAFT ADVANCE AGENDA as of June 14, 2018; 9:30 a.m. Please note this is a work in progress; items are tentative To: Council & Staff From: City Clerk, by direction of City Manager Re: Draft Schedule for Upcoming Council Meetings June 26, 2018, Formal 6:00 p.m. Meeting cancelled June 26-29, 2018: AWC Annual Conference, Yakima, WA July 3, 2018, Study Session, 6:00 p.m. [due Tue June 26] ACTION ITEM: 1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) (5 minutes) 2. First Reading Proposed Ordinance 18-013 Repealing SVMC 2.45 - Cary Driskell (5 minutes) 3. Motion Consideration: Bid Award: Argonne Rd Preser.Project, Broadway to Indiana - G. Mantz (15 min) 4. Motion Consideration: Preferred Alt: Sullivan & Wellesley Inter. Improv.-E.Amsden, G.Mantz (10 min) NON -ACTION ITEM: 5. Sullivan Bridge Project Completion - Erica Amsden, Gloria Mantz (15 minutes) 6. Mission Avenue Street Preservation (McDonald to Evergreen) - Gloria Mantz, Erica Amsden (15 minutes) 7. Street Addressing Standard - Doug Powell (15 minutes) 8. Advance Agenda - Mayor Higgins (5 minutes) 9. Info Only: Finance Monthly Report [*estimated meeting: 85 mins] July 10, 2018, Formal meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. 1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) 2. Admin Report: CenterPlace West Lawn Update - Mike Stone 3. Motion Consideration: Economic Analysis of Venues & Events re 4. Admin Report: Telephone Utility Tax - Chelsie Taylor 5. Admin Report: TIB Grant Applications - Colin Quinn -Hurst 6. Admin Report: SVMC 2.75 (public records) Update - Erik Lamb 7. Advance Agenda - Mayor Higgins [due MON July 21 (5 minutes) (10 minutes) (20 minutes) (20 minutes) (10 minutes) (10 minutes) (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting: 80 mins] Tourism - Chelsie Taylor July 17, 2018, Study Session, 6:00 p.m. 1. Aging & Long Term Care of Eastern Washington - Lynn Kimball, Exe. Director 2. Code Text Amendment, Lot Size for Animals - Micki Harnois 3. Comprehensive Plan Amendments - Lori Barlow, Marty Palaniuk, Micki Harnois, K.Kendall 4. Council Goals/Priorities for Lodging Tax - Chelsie Taylor 5. Advance Agenda - Mayor Higgins [due Tue July 10] (20 minutes) (15 minutes) (30 minutes) (15 minutes) (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting: 85 mins] July 24, 2018, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. [due Tue July 17] 1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) (5 minutes) 2. First Reading Ordinance 18-014 Code Text Amendment, Lot Size for Animals - Micki Harnois (10 minutes) 3. First Reading Ordinance 18-015, Comp Plan Amendment - Lori Barlow (20 minutes) 4. First Reading Ordinance 18-016 Comp Plan Amendment, Zoning Map - Lori Barlow (5 minutes) 5. Motion Consideration: TIB Grant Applications - Colin Quinn -Hurst (10 minutes) 6 Motion Consideration: Bid Award, Mission Avenue St. Preservation, McDonald -Evergreen - G.Mantz (5 min) 7. Admin Report: Quarterly Police Department Report - Chief Werner (10 minutes) 8. Advance Agenda - Mayor Higgins (5 minutes) 9. Info Item: Department Reports [*estimated meeting: 70 mins] July 31, 2018, Study Session, 6:00 p.m. [due Tue July 24] ACTION ITEMS: 1. Second Reading Ordinance 18-014 Code Text Amendment, Lot Size for Animals - Micki Harnois (10 mins) 2. Second Reading Ordinance 18-015 Comp Plan Amendment - Lori Barlow (15 minutes) Draft Advance Agenda 6/14/2018 11:17:20 AM Page 1 of 3 3. Second Reading Ordinance 18-016 Comp Plan Amendment, Zoning Map — Lori Barlow 4. Motion Consideration: Council Goals/Priorities For Lodging Tax — Chelsie Taylor NON -ACTION ITEMS: 5. Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins [*estimated meeting: August 7, 2018 Meeting Cancelled — National Night Out August 14, 2018, Formal meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. 1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) 2. Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins August 21, 2018, Study Session, 6:00 p.m. 1. Estimated Revenues & Expenditures 2019 Budget — Chelsie Taylor 2. Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins August 28, 2018, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. 1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) 2. Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins 3. Info Item: Department Reports Sept 4, 2018, Study Session, 6:00 p.m. 1. Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins Sept 11, 2018, Formal meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. 1. PUBLIC HEARING #1: 2019 Revenues including Property Taxes — Chelsie Taylor 2. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes; motion to set Oct 9 budget hearing) 3. Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins (5 minutes) (15 minutes) (5 minutes) 50 mins] [due Tue Aug 71 (5 minutes) (5 minutes) [due Tue Aug 141 (20 minutes) (5 minutes) [due Tue Aug 211 (5 minutes) (5 minutes) [due Tue Aug 281 (5 minutes) [due Tue Sept 41 (15 minutes) (5 minutes) (5 minutes) Sept 18, 2018, Study Session, 6:00 p.m. [due Tue Sept 111 1. Admin Report: Proposed Ordinance Adopting 2019 Property Taxes — Chelsie Taylor (10 minutes) 2. Outside Agencies Presentations (Economic Dev & Social Services combined) — Chelsie Taylor — 90 minutes 3. Advance Agenda - Mayor Higgins (5 minutes) Sept 25, 2018, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. 1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) 2. City Manager Presentation of 2019 Preliminary Budget — Mark Calhoun 3. Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins 4. Info Item: Department Reports Oct 2, 2018, Study Session, 6:00 p.m. 1. Budget Amendment, 2018 — Chelsie Taylor 2. Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins Oct 9, 2018, Formal meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. 1. PUBLIC HEARING #2: 2019 Budget — Chelsie Taylor 2. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) 3. First Reading Ordinance 18- , Property Tax — Chelsie Taylor 4. Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins Oct 16, 2018, Study Session, 6:00 p.m. 1. Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins Oct 23, 2018, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. 1. PUBLIC HEARING: 2018 Budget Amendment — Chelsie Taylor Draft Advance Agenda 6/14/2018 11:17:20 AM [due Tue Sept 181 (5 minutes) (45 minutes) (5 minutes) [due Tue Sept 25 (10 minutes) (5 minutes) [due Tue Oct 21 (20 minutes) (5 minutes) (10 minutes) (5 minutes) [due Tue Oct 91 (5 minutes) [due Tue Oct 161 (10 minutes) Page 2 of 3 2. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) 3. Second Reading Ordinance 18- , Property Tax — Chelsie Taylor 4. First Reading Ordinance 18 -,adopting 2018 Budget Amendment — Chelsie Taylor 5. First Reading Ordinance 18- , adopting 2019 Budget — Chelsie Taylor 6. Motion Consideration: Outside Agency Allocation of Funds — Chelsie Taylor 7. Admin Report: Quarterly Police Department Report — Chief Werner 8. Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins 9. Info Item: Department Reports [*estimated meeting Oct 30, 2018, Study Session, 6:00 p.m. [due 1. Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins Nov 6, 2018, Study Session, 6:00 p.m. 1. Fee Resolution for 2019 — Chelsie Taylor 2. Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins Nov 13, 2018, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. 1. PUBLIC HEARING #3: 2019 Budget — Chelsie Taylor 2. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) 3. Second Reading Ordinance 18 -,adopting 2018 Budget Amendment — Chelsie Taylor 4. Second Reading Ordinance 18-, adopting 2019 Budget — Chelsie Taylor 5. Admin Report: LTAC Recommendations to Council — Chelsie Taylor Nov 20, 2018, Study Session, 6:00 p.m. 1. Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins 2. Info Item: Department Reports Nov 27, 2018 — Meeting Cancelled — Thanksgiving Holiday Dec 4, 2018, Study Session, 6:00 p.m. 1. Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins Dec 11, 2018, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. 1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) 2. Proposed Fee Resolution for 2019 — Chelsie Taylor 3. Motion Consideration: Award of Lodging Tax for 2019 — Chelsie Taylor Dec 18, 2018, Study Session, 6:00 p.m. 1. Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins 2. Info Item: Department Reports No Meeting: Tuesday, December 25, 2018, and no meeting Tuesday, January 1, 2019 *time for public or Council comments not included OTHER PENDING AND/OR UPCOMING Animal Control Regulations (SVMC 7.30) Camping in RVs Donation Recognition Duplex Density Electrical Inspections Federal Lobbyist Governance Manual Legislative Remote Testimony (Chambers) LTAC/Council Jt Mtg (Aug?) Naming City Facilities Protocol Neighborhood Restoration Program Police Dept. Quarterly Rpt (April, July, Oct, Jan) Draft Advance Agenda 6/14/2018 11:17:20 AM [due (5 minutes) (10 minutes) (10 minutes) (10 minutes) (20 minutes) (10 minutes) (5 minutes) : 80 mins] [due Tue Oct 231 (5 minutes) Tue Oct 30] (15 minutes) (5 minutes) Tue Nov 61 (15 minutes) (5 minutes) (10 minutes) (10 minutes) (15 minutes) [due Tue Nov 13] (5 minutes) Idue Tue Nov 261 (5 minutes) [due Tue Dec 41 (5 minutes) (10 minutes) (15 minutes) Idue Tue Dec 11] (5 minutes) ISSUES/MEETINGS: Police Precinct Lease Renewal (Nov '18) Sign Ordinance Snowplows, sidewalk snow removal etc St. Illumination (ownership, cost, location) St. O&M Pavement Preservation Tobacco 21 Resolution TPA Utility Facilities in ROW Page 3 of 3 City of Spokane Valley Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 01/01/2018 - 01/31/2018 Page Title 1 Cover Sheet 2 Pre -Application Meetings Requested 3 Online Applications Received 4 Construction Applications Received 5 Land Use Applications Received 6 Construction Permits Issued 7 Land Use Applications Approved 8 Development Inspections Performed 9 Code Enforcement 10 Revenue 11 Building Permit Valuations Printed 06/0612018 10:05 Page 1 of 11 Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 01/01/2018 - 01/31/2018 Pre -Application Meetings Requested A Pre -Application Meeting is a service provided to help our customers identify the code requirements related to their project proposal. Community & Public Works Department scheduled a total of 16 Pre -Application Meetings in January 2018. 20 15 10 5 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Commercial Pre -App Land Use Pre -Application: Meeting Monthly Totals Annual Total To -Date: 16 Land Use Pre -Application I[♦ Commercial Pre -App Meeting Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 Printed 06/06/2016 10:05 Page 2 of 11 0 0 Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 01/01/2018 - 01/31/2018 Online Applications Received Community & Public Works Department received a total of 225 Online Applications in January 2018. 300 200 100 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Trade Permit 1 Sign Permit pproa' r Demolition Permit Other Online Applications Pre -Application Meeting Request 1 Right of Way Permit Reroof Permit Reroof Permit Right of Way Permit Sign Permit Trade Permit Pre -Application Meeting Request Demolition Permit Other Online Applications ® Approach Permit Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 85 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 124 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Monthly Totals 225 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Annual Total To -Date: Printed 06/06120/8 10:05 225 Page 3 of 11 Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 01/01/2018 - 01/31/2018 Construction Applications Received Community & Public Works Department received a total of 423 Construction Applications in January 2018. 600 400 200 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Commercial - New Commercial - TT Residential - New IIIII Other Construction Permits Commercial - New Commercial - TI Residential - New Commercial - Trade Residential - Trade Residential - Accessory Demolition Sign Other Construction Permits Monthly Totals Annual Total To -Date: Printed 06/0612018 10:07 422 ]an Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 38 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 51 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 *6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 *8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 *269 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 422 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Includes Online Applications. Page 4 of 11 Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 01/01/2018 - 01/31/2018 Land Use Applications Received Community & Public Works Department received a total of 76 Land Use Applications in January 2018. 100 50 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec MO Boundary Line Adjustment Binding Site Plan Preliminary State Environmental Polley Short Plat Preliminary Final Platting Act (SEPA) .1 Long Plat Preliminary Zoning Map/Comp Plan Amendment Administrative Exception/Interpretation Other Land Use Permits Boundary Line Adjustment Short Plat Preliminary Long Plat Preliminary Binding Site Plan Preliminary Final Platting Zoning Map/Comp Plan Amendment State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Administrative Exception/Interpretation Other Land Use Permits Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 4 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 64 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Monthly Totals 76 0 0 0 0 0 0 0' 0 0 0 0 Annual Total To -Date: Printed 06/06/2018 10:07 76 Page 5 of 11 Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 01101/2018 - 01/31/2018 Construction Permits Issued Community & Public Works Department issued a total of 409 Construction Permits in January 2018. 600 400 200 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Commercial - New Commercial -11 Residential - New Other Construction Permits Commercial - New Commercial - TI Residential - New Commercial - Trade Residential - Trade Residential - Accessory Demolition Sign Other Construction Permits Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 37 12 20 10 58 3 4 9 255 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Monthly Totals 408 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Annual Total To -Date: Printed 06/0612018 10:08 408 Page 6 of 11 0 0 0 Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 01/01/2018 - 01/31/2018 Land Use Applications Approved Community & Public Works Department approved a total of 64 Land Use Applications in January 2018. 80 60 40 20 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Boundary Line Adjustment Short Plat Preliminary I Long Plat Preliminary i7=4 Binding Site Plan Preliminary Final Platting Zoning Map/Ccmp Plan Amendment Boundary Line Adjustment Short Plat Preliminary Long Plat Preliminary Binding Site Plan Preliminary Final Platting Zoning Map/Comp Plan Amendment State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Administrative Exception/Interpretation Other Land Use Permits Monthly Totals Annual Total To -Date: Printed 06)06/2018 10:08 64 - State Environmental Policy I Act (SEPA) Administrative Exception/Interpretation )♦ Other Land Use Permits Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 61 0 0 0 0 64 0 0 0 0 0 Page 7 of 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 01/01/2018 - 01/31/2018 Development Inspections Performed Community & Public Warks Department performed a total of 1054 Development Inspections in January 2018, Development Inspections include building, planning, engineering and ROW inspections. 2,000 1,500 1,000 500 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec -+W 2016 2017 -- 2018 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Totals 1,053 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 965 776 1,356 1,351 1,727 1,680 1,372 1,760 1,458 1,626 1,379 1,114 i, 764 958 1,333 1,390 1,443 1,565 1,287 1,459 1,553 1,529 1,509 1,074 r Printed 06/06/2018 10:09 Page 8 of 11 Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 01101/2018 - 01/31/2018 Code Enforcement Code Enforcement Officers responded to 99 citizen requests in the month of January. They are listed by type below. Please remember that all complaints, even those that have no violation, must bo investigated. 100 50 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec CE -Stop Work Order i Complaint, Non -violation Environmental General Nuisance Property CE -Stop Work Order Complaint, Nan -Violation Environmental General Nuisance Property Monthly Totals Annual Total To -Date: Printed 0610612018 10:09 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nay Dec 99 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 75 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Page 9 of 11 Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 01/01/2018 - 01/31/2018 Revenue Community & Public Works Department Revenue totaled $193,214 in January 2018. 350,000 300,000 250,000 200,000 150,000 100,000 50,000 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2018 2017 Five -Year Trend 2018 Trend 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 $193,214 $0 $0 $0 $ $141,336 $114,162 $200,027 $177,670 $255,932 $239,522 $168,601 $161,655 $158,931 $175,053 $136,687 $185,045 $153,153 $153,939 $237,444 $318,163 $274,897 $156,278 $144,167 $159,789 $202,869 $250,078 $213,319 $191,658 $383,912 $196,705 $371,319 $243,029 $128,848 $271,681 $252,268 $207,849 $150,902 $74,775 $108,328 $161,174 $187,199 $123,918 $117,453 $162,551 $162,864 $99,587 $181,791 $99,627 $74,528 $66,134 $198,571 $160,508 $282,086 $152,637 $117,776 $127,540 $153,838 $149,197 $84A42 $158,912 $51,536 $102,538 $106,496 $184,176 $409,592 $277,553 $102,021 $129,174 $133,561 $96,386 Printed 06/0612018 10:11 Page 10 of 11 $114,587 IIIIIIII $173,009 $133,482 Ma $102,195 $97,689 $66,559 2018 Trend 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 01/01/2018 - 01/31/2018 Community & Public Works Department Building Permit Valuation totaled $12,858,279 in January 2018. 80,000,000 60,000,000 40,000,000 20,000,000 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2018 2017 -- Five Year Trend $12.86M $0,OOM $0.00M $0.00M $0.00M $0,00M $0.00M $0.00M $0.00M $0.00M $0.00M $0.00M MI $12,68M $12.32M $16.83M $15.22M $27.19M $22.32M $12.24M $14.94M $13.57M $11.13M $18.31M $7.24M MI $23.82M $18,37M $6.98M $31.20M $35.66M $35.64M $9.78M $9.05M $8.88M $10.14M $67.10M $16.78M iiiii $7.97M $28.14M $55.63M $10,10M $36,76M $19,11M $7.07M $41.60M $33,68M $9,13M $7.76M $5.52M $2.93M $10.71M $8,07M $18.60M $6.73M $7,53M $5.05M $8.06M $5,15M $14.42M $5.86M $5.08M $3.18M $2.45M $9.90M $8.92M $34.58M $7,44M $6.37M $9.47M $12.01M $7.74M $3.60M $6.30M $25.49M $1.92M $3.59M $7,30M $22.22M $41.88M $32.91M $6.52M $8.11M $14.22M $7.25M $2.54M Printed 0610612018 10:11 Page 11 of 11 City of Spokane Valley Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 01/01/2018 - 02/28/2018 Page Title 1 Cover Sheet 2 Pre -Application Meetings Requested 3 Online Applications Received 4 Construction Applications Received 5 Land Use Applications Received 6 Construction Permits Issued 7 Land Use Applications Approved 8 Development Inspections Performed 9 Code Enforcement 10 Revenue 11 Building Permit Valuations Printed 06/06/2018 10:15 Page 1 of 11 Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 01/01/2018 - 02/2812018 Pre -Application Meetings Requested A Pre -Application Meeting is a service provided to help our customers identify the code requirements related to their project proposal. Community & Public Works Department scheduled a total of 15 Pre -Application Meetings in February 2018. 20 15 10 5 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Commercial Pre -App Land Use Pre -Application Meeting Monthly Totals Annual Total To -Date: 31 Land Use Pre -Application ® Commercial Pre -App Meeting Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 8 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 15 0 0 0 0 U 0 0 0 0 0 Printed 06/0612018 10:15 Page 2 of 11 Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 01/01/2018 - 02/28/2018 Online Applications Received Community & Public Works Department received a total of 189 Online Applications in February 2018. 300 200 100 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Trade Permit I Right of Way Permit I Sign Permit Reroof Permit Approach Permit Demolition Permit Other Online Applications Pre -Application Meeting Request Reroaf Permit Right of Way Permit Sign Permit Trade Permit Pre -Application Meeting Request Demolition Permit 1 Other Online Applications Approach Permit Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 0 0 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 o o o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 85 56 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 124 115 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Monthly Totals 225 188 0 0 0 Annual Total To -Date: Printed 06/06/2018 10:15 413 Page 3 of 11 0 0 0 0 0 Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 01/01/2018 - 02/28/2018 Construction Applications Received Community & Public Works Department received a total of 391 Construction Applications in February 2018. 600 400 200 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Commercial - New Commercial -11 Residential - New Ii• Other Construction Permits Commercial - New Commercial - TI Residential - New Commercial Trade Residential - Trade Residential - Accessory Demolition Sign Other Construction Permits Monthly Totals Annual Total To -Date: Printed 06/06/2018 10:16 809 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 38 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 51 62 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 *6 *5 *8 *7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 *269 *264 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 422 387 0 0 Page 4 of 11 0 0 0 0 Includes Online Applications. Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 01/01/2018 - 02/28/2018 Land Use Applications Received Community & Public Works Department received a total of 57 Land Use Applications in February 2018. 100 50 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Boundary Line Adjustment Short Plat Preliminary 1 Long Plat Preliminary Boundary Line Adjustment Short Plat Preliminary Long Plat Preliminary Binding Site Plan Preliminary Final Platting Zoning Map/Comp Plan Amendment State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Administrative Exception/Interpretation Other Land Use Permits ltnti Binding Site Plan Preliminary Final Platting Zoning Map/Comp Plan Amendment I - State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA) Administrative Exception/Interpretation Other Land Use Permits Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 4 3 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o i o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 64 45 0 0 0 0 Monthly Totals 76 57 Annual Total To -Date: Printed 06/06/2018 10:16 133 Page 5 of 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 01/01/2018 - 02/28/2018 Construction Permits issued Community & Public Warks Department issued a total of 353 Construction Permits in February 2018. 600 400 200 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Commercial - New Commercial - TI Residential - New Other Construction Permits Commercial - New Commercial - TI Residential - New Commercial - Trade Residential - Trade Residential - Accessory Demolition Sign Other Construction Permits Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 37 2 0 12 8 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 58 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 9 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 255 256 0 0 0 Monthly Totals 408 349 0 0 0 Annual Total To -Date: Printed 06106/2018 10:17 757 Page 6 of 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 01/01/2018 - 02/28/2018 Land Use Applications Approved Community & Public Works Department approved a total of 40 Land Use Applications in February 2018. 80 60 40 20 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Boundary Line Adjustment Short Plat Preliminary E Long Plat Preliminary Bou dary U a Adjustment Short Plat Preliminary Long Plat Preliminary Binding Site Plan Preliminary Final Platting Zoning Map/Comp Plan Amendment State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Binding Site Plan Preliminary Final Platting Zoning Map/Comp Plan Amendment State Environmental Policy I .. _ 1 Act (SEPA) Administrative Exception/Interpretation Other Land Use Permits Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Administrative Exception/Interpretation Other Land Use Permits Monthly Totals Annual Total To -Date: Printed 06/06/2018 10:17 104 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 a i 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 61 33 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 64 40 0' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Page 7 of 11 Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 01/01/2018 - 02/2812018 Development Inspections Performed Community & Public Works Department performed a total of 1025 Development Inspections in February 2018. Development Inspections include building, planning, engineering and ROW inspections. 2,000 1,500 1,000 500 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec �►- 2016 2017 --- 2018 Jan Feb Mar Apr May ]un Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Totals 1,053 1,022 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 965 776 1,356 1,351 1,727 1,680 1,372 1,760 1,458 1,626 1,379 1,114 764 958 1,333 1,390 1,413 1,565 1,287 1,454 1,553 1,529 1,509 1,074 Printed 06/06/2018 10:18 Page 8 of 11 rnmuunnum Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 01/01/2018 - 02/28/2018 Code ±d-frr'o,.Gotn ri Code Enforcement Officers responded to 45 citizen requests in the month of February. They are listed by type below. Please remember that all complaints, even those that have no violation, must be investigated. 100 50 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec ® CE -Stop Work Order Complaint, Non -Violation Environmental 1 General Nuisance I= Property CE -Stop Work Order Complaint, Non -Violation Environmental General Nuisance Property Jan Feb Mar Apr May Sun lul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 32 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 75 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Monthly Totals 99 45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Annual Total To -Date: Printed 06/06/2018 10:18 144 Page 9 of 11 Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 01/01/2018 - 02/28/2018 Revenue Community & Public Works Department Revenue totaled $124,191 in February 2018. 2018 Trend 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 350,000 300,000 250,000 200,000 150,000 100,000 50,000 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec -0- 2018 2017 - Five -Year Trend Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Totals $193,214 $124,191 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $141,336 $114,162 $200,027 $177,670 $255,932 $239,522 $168,601 $161,655 $158,931 $175,053 $136,687 $114,587 $185,045 $153,153 $153,939 $237,444 $318,163 $274,897 $156,278 $144,167 $159,789 $202,869 $250,078 $173,009 82.13,319 $191,658 $383,912 $196,705 $371,319 $243,029 $128,848 $271,684 $252,268 $207,849 $150,902 $133,482 $74,775 $108,328 $161,174 $187,199 $123,918 $117,453 $162,551 $162,864 $99,587 $181,791 $99,627 $102,195 MIN $74,628 $66,134 $198,571 $160,508 $282,086 $152,637 $117,776 $127,540 $153,838 $149,197 $84,442 $97,689 $158,912 $51,536 $102,538 $106,496 $184,176 $409,592 $277,553 $102,021 $129,174 $133,561 $98,386 $66,559 Printed 06106/2018 10:19 Page 10 of 11 Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 01/01/2018 - 02/28/2018 Building Permit Valuation Community & Public Works Department Building Permit Valuation totaled $6,720,197 in February 2018. 60,000,000 60,000,000 40,000,000 20,000,000 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec -a- 2018 2017 -- Five -Year Trend $12.86M $6.72M $0.00M $0,00M $0,00M $0.00M $0.00M $0.00M $0.00M $0.00M $0.0OM $0.00M $12.68M $12.32M $16.83M $15.22M $27.19M $22.32M $12,24M $14.94M $13.57M $11,13M $18.31M $7.24M $23,82M $18.37M $6.98M $31,20M $35.66M $35.64M $9,78M $9.05M $8.88M $10.14M $67.10M $16.78M $7.97M $28.14M $55.63M $10.10M $36.76M $19.11M $7.07M $41.60M $33.68M $9.13M $7.76M $5.52M $2.93M $10.71M $8.07M $18.60M $6.73M $7.53M $5.05M $8,06M $5.15M $14.42M $5,86M $5.08M $3.18M $2.45M $9.90M $8.92M $34.58M $7,44M $6.37M $9.47M $12.01M $7.71M $3,60M $6.30M $25.49M $1,92M $3.59M $7.30M $22.22M $41,88M $32.91M $6.52M $8.11M $14.22M $7.25M $2.54M [ Printed 06106/2018 10:19 Page 11 of 11 City of Spokane Valley Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 01/01/2018 - 03/31/2018 Page Title 1 Cover Sheet 2 Pre -Application Meetings Requested 3 Online Applications Received 4 Construction Applications Received 5 Land Use Applications Received 6 Construction Permits Issued 7 Land Use Applications Approved 8 Development Inspections Performed 9 Code Enforcement 10 Revenue 11 Building Permit Valuations Printed 06/06/2018 10:22 Page 1 of 11 Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 01/01/2018 - 03/31/2018 Pre -Application Meetings Requested A Pre -Application Meeting is a service provided to help our customers identify the code requirements related to their project proposal. Community & Public Works Department scheduled a total of 18 Pre -Application Meetings in March 2018. 20 10 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Land Use Pre -Application = Commercial Pre -App Meeting Commercial Pre -App Land Use Pre -Application Meeting Monthly Totals Annual Total To -Date: 49 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 8 6 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 9 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 15 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Printed 06/06/2018 10:22 Page 2 of 11 Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 01/01/2018 - 03/31/2018 Online Applications Received Community & Public Works Department received a total of 237 Online Applications in March 2018. 400 200 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May ]un Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Trade Permit 1 Sign Permit l Right of Way Permit Reroof Permit Approach Permit Demolition Permit Other Online Applications Pre -Application Meeting Request Reroof Permit Right of Way Permit Sign Permit Trade Permit Monthly Totals Annual Total To -Date: Printed 06106/2018 10:22 649 Pre -Application Meeting Request Demolition Permit I 'el Other Online Applications Approach Permit ]an Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 2 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 12 21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 85 56 80 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 124 115 L24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 225 188 236 Page 3 of 11 0 0' 0 0' 0 0 0 0 Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 01/01/2018 - 03/31120/8 Construction Applications Received Community & Public Works Department received a total of 423 Construction Applications in March 2018. 600 400 200 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Commercial - New Commercial - New Commercial -11 Residential New Commercial - Trade Residential - Trade Residential - Accessory Demolition Sign Other Construction Permits 1 Commercial -11 Residential - New MI Other Construction Permits Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 38 16 17 13 51 4 *6 *8 *269 6 5 18 12 62 8 *5 *7 *264 4 12 11 8 37 17 *10 *8 *314 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Monthly Totals 422 387 421 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Annual Total To -Date: Printed 06/08/2018 10:23 1,230 Page 4 of 11 *Includes Online Applications. Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 01/01/2018 - 03/31/2018 Land Use Applications Received Community & Public Works Department received a total of 64 Land Use Applications in March 2018. 100 50 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Boundary Line Adjustment r.. Binding Site Plan Preliminary Short Plat Preliminary Final Platting 17,47,1 Long Plat Preliminary Zoning Map/Comp Pian Amendment Boundary Line Adjustment Short Plat Preliminary Long Plat Preliminary Binding Site Plan Preliminary Final Platting Zoning Map/Comp Plan Amendment State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Administrative Exception/Interpretation Other Land Use Permits State Environmental Policy I Act (SEPA) Administrative Exception/Interpretation Other Land Use Permits Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 9 2 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 1 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 64 45 52 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Monthly Totals 76 57 64 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Annual Total To -Date: Printed 06/06/2018 10:23 197 Page 5 of 11 Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 01/01/2018 - 03/31/2018 Construction Permits issued Community & Public Works Department issued a total of 432 Construction Permits in March 2018. 600 400 200 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Commercial • New - Commercial - T1 Residential - New Other Construction Permits Commercial - New Commercial - TI Residential - New Commercial - Trade Residential - Trade Residential - Accessory Demolition Sign Other Construction Permits Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 37 12 20 10 58 3 2 5 0 0 0 0 8 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 53 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 4 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 255 256 303 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Monthly Totals 408 349 429 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Annual Total To -Date: Printed 06/06/2018 10:24 1,186 Page 5 of 11 Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 01/01/2018 - 03/31/2018 Land Use Applications Approved Community & Public Works Department approved a total of 60 Land Use Applications in March 2018. 80 60 40 20 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May 3un Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Boundary Line Adjustment Short Plat Prelinllnary I Long Plat Preliminary Boundary Line Adjustment Short Plat Preliminary Long Plat Preliminary Binding Site Plan Preliminary Final Platting Zoning Map/Comp Plan Amendment State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Administrative Exception/Interpretation Other Land Use Permits Monthly Totals Annual Total To -Date: Printed 06/06/2018 10:24 164 Binding Site Plan Preliminary Final Platting Zoning Map/Comp Plan Amendment State Environmental Policy I_ _J Act (SEPA) Administrative Exception/Interpretation Other Land Use Permits Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 61 33 55 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 64 40 60 0 0 Page 7 of 11 0 0 0 0 Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 01101/2018 - 03/31/2018 Development Inspections Performed Community & Public Works Department performed a total of 1560 Development Inspections in March 2018. Development inspections include building, planning, engineering and ROW inspections. 2,000 1,500 1,000 500 0 2018 2017 2016: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec -+- 2016 2017 — 2018 Jan Feb Mar Apr May ]un Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Totals 1,053 1,022 1,557 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 965 776 1,356 1,351 1,727 1,680 1,372 1,760 1,958 1,626 1,379 1,114 764 958 1,333 1,390 1,443 1,565 1,287 1,454 1,553 1,529 1,509 1,074 Printed 06/06/2018 10:25 Page 8 of 11 Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 01/01/2018 - 03/31/2018 Code Enforcement Code Enforcement Officers responded to 44 citizen requests in the month of March. They are listed by type below. Please remember that all complaints, even those that have no violation, must be investigated. Jan Feb Mar Apr May ]un Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec CE -Stop Work Order Complaint, Non -Violation CE -Stop Work Order Complaint, Non -Violation Environmental General Nuisance. Property Environmental E I General Nuisance on Property Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a o 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 32 32 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 75 11 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Monthly Totals 99 45 44 0 0 0 0 Annual Total To -Date: Printed 06/06/2018 10:25 188 Page 9 of 11 0 Revenue 2018 Trend 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 01/01/2018 - 03/31/2018 Community & Public Works Department Revenue totaled $204,532 in March 2018. 350,000 300,000 250,000 200,000 150,000 100,000 50,000 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec -41- 2018 2017 -- Five -Year Trend $193,214 $124,191 $204,532 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $141,336 $114,162 $200,027 $177,670 $255,932 $239,522 $168,601 $161,655 $158,931 $175,053 $185,045 $153,153 $153,939 $237,444 $318,163 $274,897 $156,278 $144,167 $159,789 $202,869 $213,319 $191,658 $383,912 $196,705 $371,319 $243,029 $128,848 $271,684 $252,268 $207,849 $74,775 $108,328 $161,174 $187,199 $123,918 $117,453 $162,551 $162,864 $99,587 $181,791 $74,628 $66,134 $198,571 $160,508 $282,086 $152,637 $117,776 $127,5413 $153,838 $149,197 $158,912 $51,536 $102,538 $106,496 $184,176 $409,592 $277,553 $102,021 $129,174 $133,561 Printed 06/06/2018 10:26 Page 10 of 11 $0 $0 $ $136,687 $114,587 $2,044,164 $250,078 $173,009$2,408,831 $150,902 $133,482$2,744,975 $99,627 $102,195 $1,581,462 $81,442 $97,689 ,665,046 $98,386 $66,559 $1,820,504' Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 01/01/2018 - 03131/2018 L N_4'N�r�d i1r] 1�''C'Ir'rudc+n,` Vr P,!i'a 4101 Community & Public Works Department Building Permit Valuation totaled $27,600,422 in March 2018. 80,000,000 60,000,000 40,000,000 20,000,000 0 Jar Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec "-+' 2018 2017 Five -Year Trend 2018 Trend 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 $12.86M $6.72M $27.60M $0,00M $0.00M $0,00M $0,00M $0.00M $0,0OM $0.00M $0.00M $0,00M1 $12.68M $12.32M $16.83M $15.22M $27.19M $22.32M $12,24M $14.94M $13.57M $11,13M $18.31M $7,24M $23,82M $18.37M $6.98M $31.20M $35.66M $35.64M $9.78M $9.05M $8.88M $10,14M $67,10M $16.78M $7.97M $28.14M $55.63M $10.1OM $36,76M $19.11M $7.07M $41.60M $33.68M $9.13M $7.76M $5.52M1 $2,93M $10.71M $B.07M $18.60M $6.73M $7.53M $5.05M $8.06M $5,15M $14.42M $5.86M $5.08M $3.18M $2.45M $9,90M $8.92M $34.5BM $7,44M $6.37M $9.47M $12.01M $7.74M $3.60M $6.30M $25.49M $1.92M $3,59M $7.30M $22.22M $41.88M $32.91M $6.52M $8.11M $14,22M $7.25M $2.54M1 Printed 0610612018 10:26 Page 11 of 11 $47.18M' $183.09M, $273.4014 $262.47M $98.19M $111.9611 $173.95M1 City of Spokane Valley Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 01/01/2018 - 04130/2018 Page Title 1 Cover Sheet 2 Pre -Application Meetings Requested 3 Online Applications Received 4 Construction Applications Received 5 Land Use Applications Received 6 Construction Permits Issued 7 Land Use Applications Approved 8 Development Inspections Performed 9 Code Enforcement 10 Revenue 11 Building Permit Valuations Printed 06/06/2018 10:29 Page 1 of 11 Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 0110112018 - 04/30/2018 Pre -Application Meetings Requested A Pre -Application Meeting is a service provided to help our customers identify the code requirements related to their project proposal. Community & Public Works Department scheduled a total of 11 Pre -Application Meetings in April 2018. 20 10 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Land Use Pre -Application Commercial Pre -App Meeting Commercial Pre -App Land Use Pre -Application Meeting Monthly Totals 16 15 18 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 6 19 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 9 9 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Annual Total To -Date: 60 Printed 06/06/2018 10:29 Page 2 of 11 0 Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 01/01/2018 - 04/30/2018 Online Applications Received Community & Public Works Department received a total of 255 Online Applications in April 2018. Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Trade Permit r="' l Right of Way Permit F,171 Sign Permit Reroof Permit Pre -Application Meeting Request Demolition Permit Other Online Applications NO Approach Permit Approach Permit Demolition Permit Other Online Applications Pre -Application Meeting Request Reroof Permit Right of Way Permit Sign Permit Trade Permit Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 0 3 0 0 12 85 1 124 0 2 0 0 12 56 3 115 3 6 1 0 21 80 1 124 5 1 0 0 29 99 0 121 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Monthly Totals 225 188 236 255 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Annual Total To -Date: 904 Printed 06/06/2018 10:29 Page 3 of 11 Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 01/0112018 - 04130/2018 a1',i) i`ad.. i°�; i U i)[ if fI�Y,SGd' c �'1;�,1Pn i U f S`;4 ive Community & Public Works Department received a total of 517 Construction Applications in April 2018. 600 400 200 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Commercial - New I Commercial -11 Residential - New I♦ Other Construction Permits Commercial - New Commercial - 11-1 Residential - New Commercial - Trade Residential - Trade Residential - Accessory Demolition Sign Other Construction Permits Monthly Totals Annual Total To -Date: Printed 06/06/2018 10:31 1,744 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 38 6 4 28 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 5 12 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 18 11 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 12 8 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 51 62 37 58 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 8 17 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 *6 *5 *10 *5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 *8 *7 *8 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 *269 *264 *314 *349 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 422 387 421 514 Page 4 of 11 *Includes Online Applications. Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 01/01/2018 - 04/30/2018 Land Use Applications Received Community & Public Works Department received a total of 48 Land Use Applications in April 2018. 100 50 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 111. Boundary Line Adjustment NM Short Plat Preliminary Long Plat Preliminary Binding Site Plan Preliminary Final Platting Zoning Map/Comp Plan Amendment State Environmental Polley Act (SEPA) Administrative Exception/Interpretation Other Land Use Permits Boundary Line Adjustment Short Plat Preliminary Long Plat Preliminary Binding Site Plan Preliminary Final Platting Zoning Map/Comp Plan Amendment State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Administrative Exception/Interpretation Other Land Use Permits Monthly Totals Annual Total To -Date: Printed 06/06/2018 10:31 245 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 4 2 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 69 45 52 42 0 0 76 57 64 48 0 0 Page 5 of 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 ai 0 Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 01/01/2018 - 04/30/2018 Construction Permits Issued Community & Public Works Department issued a total of 434 Construction Permits in April 2018. Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Commercial - New Commercial - TI Residential - New _ Other Construction Permits Commercial - New Commercial - TI Residential - New Commercial - Trade Residential - Trade Residential - Accessory Demolition Sign Other Construction Permits Monthly Totals Annual Total To -Date: Printed 06/0612018 10:31 1,619 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 37 2 5 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 8 9 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 10 22 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 10 8 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 58 50 53 47 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 5 12 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 7 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 4 10 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 255 256 303 311 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 408 349 429 433 Page 6 of 11 Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 01/01/2018 - 04/30/2018 Land Use Applications Approved Community & Public Works Department approved a total of 33 Land Use Applications in April 2018. 80 60 40 20 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Boundary Line Adjustment 173: Binding Site Plan Preliminary Short Plat Preliminary Final Platting ! Long Plat Preliminary Zoning Map/Comp Plan Amendment Bo n ary 1ne, rs` ent� Short Plat Preliminary Long Plat Preliminary Binding Site Pian Preliminary Final Platting Zoning Map/Comp Plan Amendment State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Administrative Exception/Interpretation Other Land Use Permits Monthly Totals Annual Total To -Date: Printed 06/06/2018 10:31 197 State Environmental Policy I___l Act (SEPA) Administrative Exception/Interpretation Other Land Use Permits Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1 3 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 61. 33 55 29 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 64 40 60 33 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Page 7of11 Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 01/01/2018 - 04/30/2018 Development Inspections Performed Community & Public Works Department performed a total of 1480 Development Inspections in April 2018. Development Inspections include building, planning, engineering and ROW inspections. 2,000 1,500 1,000 500 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2016 2017 --- 2018 2018 2017 2016 Jan Feb Mar Apr May ]un Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Totals 1,053 1,022 1,557 1,479 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 965 776 1,356 1,351 1,727 1,680 1,372 1,760 1,458 1,626 1,379 1,114 764 958 1,333 1,390 1,443 1,565 1,287 1,454 1,553 1,529 1,509 1,074 Printed 06/06/2018 10:32 Page 8 of 11 011 Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 01/01/2018 - 04/30/2018 Code Enforcement Code Enforcement Officers responded to 66 citizen requests in the month of April. They are listed by type below. Please remember that all complaints, even those that have no violation, must be investigated. 100 50 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec CE -Stop Work Order Complaint, Non -Violation CE -Stop Work Order Complaint, Non -Violation Environmental General Nuisance Property Monthly Totals 99 45 44 66 0 0 Annual Total To -Date: Environmental I l General Nuisance MI Property ]an Feb Mar Apr May ]un Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 32 32 45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 75 11 11 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Printed 06106/2018 10:32 254 Page 9 of 11 Revenue 2018 Trend 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 01/01/2018 - 04/30/2018 Community & Public Works Department Revenue totaled $195,453 in April 2018, 350,000 300,000 250,000 200,000 150,000 100,000 50,000 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec -+- 2018 2017 Five -Year Trend Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Totals $193,214 $124,191 $204,532 $195,453 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 717,3901 $141,336 $114,162 $200,027 $177,670 $255,932 $239,522 $168,601 $161,655 $158,931 $175,053 $136,687 $114,587 p44,1641 $185,045 $153,153 $153,939 $737,444 $318,163 $274,897 $156,278 $144,167 $159,789 $202,869 $250,078 $173,009 408,831 $213,319 $191,658 $383,912 $196,705 $371,319 $243,029 $128,848 $271,684 $252,268 $207,849 $150,902 $133,482 X744,975 $74,775 $108,328 $161,174 $187,199 $123,918 $117,453 $162,551 $162,864 $99,587 $181,791 $99,627 $102,195 F,581,462 $74,628 $66,134 $198,571 $160,508 $282,086 $152,637 $117,776 $127,540 $153,838 $149,197 $84,442 $97,689 f $1,665,046 $158,912 $51,536 $102,538 $106,496 $184,176 $409,592 $277,553 $102,021 $129,174 $133,561 $98,386 $66,5591 9,504 Printed 06/06/2018 10:33 Page 10 of 11 Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 01/0112018 - 04/30/2018 Building Permit Valuation Community & Public Works Department Building Permit Valuation totaled $8,193,439 in April 2018. 80,000,000 60,000,000 40,000,000 20,000,000 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec -+- 2018 2017 Five -Year Trend 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 $12,86M $6.72M $27.60M $7.94M $0.00M $O.00M $0.00M $0.00M $0.00M $0,00M $0.00M $0.00M $12,68M $12.32M $16.83M $15,22M $27.19M $22.32M $12,24M $14.94M $13.57M $11,13M $18.31M $7,24M $23.82M $18.37M $6.98M $31.20M $35.66M $35.64M $9.78M $9.05M $8.88M $10.14M $67.10M $16.78M $273.401 $7,97M $28.14M $55.63M $10,10M $36.76M $19.11M $7.07M $11.60M $33.68M $9.13M $7.76M $5.52M '262 47m. v w $2.93M $10.71M $8.07M $18.60M $6.73M $7,53M $5.05M $8,06M $5.15M $14.42M $5.86M $5.08M $3.18M $2,45M $9.90M $8.92M $34.58M $7,44M $6.37M $9.17M $12.01M $7.74M $3.60M $6.30M $25.49M $1,92M $3.59M $7.30M $22.22M $41.88M $32.91M $6,52M $8.11M $14.22M $7.25M $2.54M Printed 06106/2018 10:33 Page 11 of 11 City of Spokane Valley Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 01/01/2018 - 05/31/2018 Page Title 1 Cover Sheet 2 Pre -Application Meetings Requested 3 Online Applications Received 4 Construction Applications Received 5 Land Use Applications Received 6 Construction Permits Issued 7 Land Use Applications Approved 8 Development Inspections Performed 9 Code Enforcement 10 Revenue 11 Building Permit Valuations Printed 06/06/2018 10:36 Page 1 of 11 Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 01/01/2018 - 05/31/2018 Pre -Application Meetings Requested A Pre -Application Meeting is a service provided to help our customers identify the code requirements related to their project proposal. Community & Public Works Department scheduled a total of 7 Pre -Application Meetings in May 2018. 20 10 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Land Use Pre -Application Commercial Pre -App Meeting Commercial Pre -App Land Use Pre -Application Meeting Monthly Totals Annual Total To -Date: 67 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 8 6 11 9 2 0 0 fl 0 0 0 8 9 4 2 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 15 18 11 7 0 0 Printed 06/06/2018 10:36 Page 2 of 11 0 Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 01/01/2018 - 05/31/2018 Online Applications Received Community & Public Works Department received a total of 252 Online Applications in May 2018. 400 200 0 1 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Trade Permit .a'. Right of Way Permit I Sign Permit Reroof Permit Pre -Application Meeting Request Demolition Permit 1 Other online Applications 1= Approach Permit Approach 'Permit Demolition Permit Other Online Applications Pre -Application Meeting Request Remo( Permit Right of Way Permit Sign Permit Trade Permit Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 0 3 0 0 12 85 1 124 0 2 0 0 12 56 3 115 3 5 1 0 0 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 29 37 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 80 99 79 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 121 131 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 124 Monthly Totals 225 188 236 255 252 0 0 0 0 0 0 Annual Total To -Date: Printed 06/06/2018 10:36 1,156 Page 3 of 11 Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 01/01/2018 - 05/31/2018 Construction Applications Received Community & Public Works Department received a total of 506 Construction Applications in May 2018. 600 400 200 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Commercial - New r Commercial - TI Residential - New Other Construction Permits Commercial - New Commercial - 11 Residential - New Commercial - Trade Residential - Trade Residential Accessary Demolition Sign Other Construction Permits Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 38 6 4 28 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 5 12 11 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 18 11 23 21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 12 8 13 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 51 62 37 58 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 8 17 22 33 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 *6 *5 *10 *5 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 *8 *7 *8 5 *13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 *269 *264 *314 *349 *367 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Monthly Totals 422 387 421 514 504 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Annual Total To -Date: Printed 06106!2018 10:36 2,248 Page 4 of 11 includes Online Applications. Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 01/01/2018 - 05/31/2018 Land Use Applications Received Community & Public Works Department received a total of 72 Land Use Applications in May 2018. 100 50 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Boundary Line Adjustment Short Plat Preliminary Long Plat Preliminary Boundary Line Adjustment Short Plat Preliminary Long Plat Preliminary Binding Site Plan Preliminary Final Platting Zoning Map/Comp Plan Amendment State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Administrative Exception /Interpretation Other Land Use Permits Monthly Totals Annual Total To -Date: Printed 06106/2018 10:36 317 Binding Site Plan Preliminary Final Platting Zoning Map/Comp Plan Amendment State Environmental Policy 1 _1 Act (SEPA) Administrative Exception/Interpretation NI Other Land Use Permits Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 4 2 6 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 4 3 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 64 45 52 42 53 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 76 57 64 48 72 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Page 5 of 11 Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 01/01/2018 - 05/31/2018 Il'� ; r—d Community & Public Works Department issued a total of 491 Construction Permits in May 2018. 600 400 200 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Commercial - New Commercial - T1 Residential - New Other Construction Permits Commercial - New Commercial 11 Residential - New Commercial - Trade Residential - Trade Residential -Accessory Demolition Sign Other Construction Permits Months ,. p,otals Annual Total To -Date: Printed 06/0612018 10:36 2,109 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 37 2 5 7 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 8 9 10 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 10 22 13 17 D 0 0 0 0 0 D 10 10 8 12 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 58 50 53 47 41 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 5 12 23 31 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 7 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 4 10 5 8 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 255 256 303 311 362 0 0 0 0 0 D 408 349 429 433 490 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 Page 6 of 11 Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 01/01/2018 - 05/31/2018 Land Use Applications Approved Community & Public Works Department approved a total of 59 Land Use Applications in May 2018. 80 60 40 20 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Boundary Line Adjustment Short Plat Preliminary Long Nat Preliminary Boundary Line Adjustment Short Plat Preliminary Long Plat Preliminary Binding Site Plan Preliminary Final Platting Zoning Map/Comp Plan Amendment State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Administrative Exception/Interpretation Other Land Use Permits Binding Site Plan Preliminary Final Platting Zoning Map/Comp Plan Amendment State Environmental Policy I _ .I Act (SEPA) Administrative Exception/Interpretation )♦ Other Land Use Permits Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1 3 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o o o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 61 33 55 29 56 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Monthly Totals 64 40 60 33 59 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Annual Total To -Date: Printed 06/06/2018 10:36 256 Page 7 of 11 Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 01/01/2018 - 05/31/2018 Development Inspections Performed Community & Public Works Department performed a total of 1766 Development Inspections in May 2018. Development inspections include building, planning, engineering and ROW inspections. 2,000 1,500 1,000 500 0 2018 2017 2016 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec -0 2016 2017 --- 2018 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Totals 1,053 1,022 1,557 1,479 1,764 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 965 776 1,356 1,351 1,727 1,680 1,372 1,760 1,458 1,626 1,379 1,114 764 958 1,333 1,390 1,443 1,565 1,287 1,454 1,553 1,529 1,509 1,074 Printed 06/06/2018 10:36 Page 8 of 11 Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 01/01/2018 - 05/31/2018 Code Enforcement Code Enforcement Officers responded to 67 citizen requests in the month of May. They are listed by type below. Please remember that all complaints, even those that have no violation, must be investigated. 100 50 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec CE -Stop Work Order Complaint, Non -Violation Environmental General Nuisance ® Property CE -Stop Work Order Complaint, Non -Violation Environmental General Nuisance Property Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 32 32 45 45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 75 11 11 19 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Monthly Totals 99 45 44 66 67 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Annual Total To -Date: Printed 06106/2018 10:36 321 Page 9 of 11 Revenue 2018 Trend 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 01/01/2018 - 05/3112018 Community & Public Works Department Revenue totaled $224,384 in May 2018. 350,000 300,000 250,000 200,000 150,000 100,000 50,000 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2018 2017 Five -Year Trend Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Totals $193,214 $124,191 $204,532 $195,453 $224,384 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $141,336 $114,162 $200,027 $177,670 $255,932 $239,522 $168,601 $161,655 $158,931 $175,053 $136,687 $114,587 $185,045 $153,153 $153,939 $237,444 $318,163 $274,897 $156,278 $144,167 $159,789 $202,869 $250,078 $173,009 $213,319 $191,658 $383,912 $196,705 $371,319 $243,029 $128,818 $271,684 $252,268 $207,849 $150,902 $133,482 $71,775 $108,328 $161,174 $187,199 $123,918 $117,453 $162,551 $162,864 $99,587 $181,791 $99,627 $102,195 $74,628 $66,134 $198,571 $160,508 $282,086 $152,637 $117,776 $127,540 $153,838 $149,197 $84,442 $97,689 $158,912 $51,536 $102,538 $106,496 $184,176 $409,592 $277,553 $102,021 $129,174 $133,561 $98,386 $66,559 Printecl 06/06/2018 10:36 Page 10 of 11 Building Permit Valuation 2018 Trend 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 01/01/2018 - 05/31/2018 Community & Public Works Department Building Permit Valuation totaled $11,533,144 in May 2018. 80,000,000 60,000,000 40,000,000 20,000,000 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec y- 2018 2017 --- Five -Year Trend Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Totals $12.86M $6.72M $27.60M $7.94M $11.52M $0,00M $0,00M $0.00M $0.00M $O.00M $O.00M $12,68M $12,32M $16,83M $15.22M $27.19M $22,32M $12.24M $14,94M $13.57M $11.13M $18,31M $23,82M $18,37M $6.98M $31.20M $35.66M $35.64M $9.78M $9,05M $8,88M $10.14M $67,10M $7.97M $28.14M $55.63M $10,1OM $36.76M $19.11M $7.07M $11,60M $33,68M $9.13M $7.76M $2.93M $10.71M $8.07M $18.60M $6.73M $7.53M $5.05M $8.06M $5.15M $14.42M $5.B6M $3.18M $2.45M $9.90M $8.92M $34,58M $7.44M $6.37M $9.47M $12.O1M $7.74M $3.60M $25.49M $1.92M $3.59M $7.30M $22.22M $41.88M $32.91M $6.52M $8.11M $14.22M $7.25M Printed 06/06/2018 10:36 Page 11 of 11 $0.00M $7.24M i $183,9914 $16.78M ! $27340M $5.52M $5.08M $6,30M $2,54M Mark Werner Chief ofPolice Spokane Valley Police Department Accredited Since 2011 Services provided in partnership with Ihc 8120A -on ' (?/[!?/V Sheriff's Office and the Community, Dedicated to Your Safety. Ozzic Knczovich Sheriff TO: Mark Calhoun, City Manager FROM: Mark Werner, Chief of Police DATE: June 19, 2018 RE: Monthly Report May 2018 in August 2016, we switched from UCR to N1BRS classification, which means we went from reporting based on a hierarchy to reporting all the crimes for each incident. Consequently, comparing crime statistics before August 2016 to crime statistics after that timeframe is not recommended using the data provided in the attached charts and graphs. ADMINISTRATIVE: Chief Werner attended the Spokane Communications (SpoCom) Board Meeting in mid-May. The Annual Law Enforcement Appreciation Breakfast was held in early May; one of the local churches hosted the event again this year. Later in the morning, a memorial presentation was held in the cul- de-sac at the Public Safety Building, where those law enforcement officers who lost their life in the line of duty were recognized. Chief Werner attended the "Let Freedom Ring" Breakfast in mid-May, at the Davenport, along with other members of the Sheriff's Office Command Staff. The Semi -Annual Washington Association of Sheriffs and Police Chiefs (WASPC) Conference was held in late May, at the Spokane Convention Center. Chief Werner and Sheriff Knezovich attended the week-long conference and various committee meetings. The 7th Annual Pace Awards Banquet was held at the Mirabeau Park Hotel at the end of May. Both Chief Werner and Sheriff Knezovich attended. Page 1 SHERIFF'S COMMUNITY ORIENTED POLICING EFFORT (SCOPE): In the month of May, S.C.O.P.E. participated in: • Lone Wolf Harley motorcycle ride - traffic control • WSCPA (WA State Crime Prevention Association) conference at CenterPlace. • Broadway Elementary bike and helmet safety event • Windermere Marathon - traffic control • Valleyfest meeting • West Valley HS community event • Safe Kids meeting • GSSAC Coalition meeting, and • Operation Family ID May 2018 Volunteers Hours per Station *Includes estimated volunteer service hours that are provided in the City of Spokane Valley. These two locations cover both Spokane Valley and the unincorporated portion of the county. Location # Volunteers Admin Hours L.E. Hours Total Hours Central Valley 5 39 73 112 East Valley* 30 285 467 752 Edgeeliff 7 229.5 11 240.5 Trentwood 5 133.5 82 215.5 University 23 456 113 569 West Valley* 21 335 63.5 398.5 TOTALS 91 1,478 809.5 2,287.5 Volunteer Value ($30.46 per hour) $69,677.25 for May 2018 S.C.O.P.E. Incident Response Team (SIRT) volunteers contributed 33 on -scene hours (including travel time) in May, responding to crime scenes, motor vehicle accidents and providing traffic control; no hours were for incidents specifically in Spokane Valley. There were three special events in May; none were in Spokane Valley. Total May volunteer hours contributed by SIRT, including training, stand-by, response and special events is 1,120; total for 2018 is 5,471. (Starting January 2018, a change is being made in how actual hours of `stand-by' time is calculated. Due to the shortage of staff necessary to cover up to 62 shifts of 24 hours per day per month, a simple formula as used in the past, no longer reflects the actual time spent on stand-by. Now, we will count each month the actual time members sign up for duly minus the time actually spent on -scene.) Abandoned Vehicles Page 2 March April May Tagged for Impounding 30 24 37 Cited/Towed 6 8 3 Hulks Processed 19 12 24 Total Vehicles Processed 114 88 143 Yearly Total of Vehicles Processed 330 418 561 Page 2 SCOPE DISABLED PARKING ACTIVITY REPORT City of Spokane Valley # of Vol. # of Vol. # of Hrs. # of Disabled Infractions Issued # of Warnings Issued # of Non - Disabled Infractions Issued January 0 0 0 0 0 February 0 0 0 0 0 March 1 3.5 1 3 0 April 1 3 0 2 0 May 1 3.5 I 0 0 YTD Total 3 10 2 5 0 $pokane County # of Vol. # of Hrs. # of Disabled Infractions Issued # of Warnings Issued # of Non - Disabled Infractions Issued January 1 11.5 1 11 0 February 3 24 7 13 0 March 3 34.5 11 16 0 April 2 21.5 2 5 0 May 3 28.5 4 20 0 YTD Total 12 120 25 65 0 OPERATIONS. Scooter Riding Suspect's Attempt to Elude Fails: Spokane Valley Deputies arrested a 21 -year- old male suspect after he attempted to avoid capture on a 40cc gas -powered scooter. The suspect dumped the scooter and continued to flee on foot, but was quickly caught and taken into custody. The male suspect was booked on felony warrants for his arrest, as well as new charges. In early May, just prior to 1:00 a.m., Spokane Valley Deputy Logan Henry observed a male sitting in the dark outside of a closed business located in the 100 block of S. Bowdish. As Deputy Henry drove toward the male, the male jumped onto a motorized scooter and began to flee south on Bowdish. Deputy Henry activated his emergency lights, but the suspect refused to stop; he then turned west on the Appleway Trail as additional deputies responded to the area to assist. Deputy Wakem responded to University and the Appleway Trail in an attempt get ahead of the suspect. When he arrived in the area, deputies advised the suspect went south on University and possibly turned west on 4th Avenue. Deputy Wakem turned onto 4' and found the male had turned around and was now approaching the patrol vehicle head-on in the westbound lane of travel. When the suspect observed the deputy's car, he made a U-turn and continued to try and outrun the patrol vehicle on his scooter. Deputy Wakem pulled alongside the male suspect, with his emergency lights activated, but Page 3 the suspect continued to make the poor choice to run. Deputy Wakem pulled ahead of the scooter and quickly exited the patrol car in time to see the suspect throw the scooter to the ground and run south across 4th toward a senior center facility and multiple residences. Deputy Wakem told the male suspect to stop and gave chase. The suspect stopped, turned back toward the deputy and raised his hands up to his chest in what appeared to be a fighting stance. Deputy Wakem took the male suspect to the ground and, with the assistance of additional deputies, took the suspect into custody. After advising the suspect of his rights, he explained he ran because he knew he had warrants for his arrest. A check of the suspect's name confirmed the arrest warrant(s) for charges of Possession of a Controlled Substance (2 counts), Possession of a Controlled Substance with Intent to Deliver, Possession of a Stolen Motor Vehicle and Possessing/Making Motor Theft Tools. The suspect was provided medical attention prior to being transported and booked into the Spokane County Jail for the warrant(s), in addition to new charges of Attempting to Elude a Police Vehicle and Obstructing. The gas -powered scooter, a BladeZ 40cc (advertised maximum speed of 35+ mph), was seized and booked into the property facility as evidence. Sexual Assault Unit Detectives Charge Suspect with Nine Counts of Possession of Child Pornography: Spokane Valley Sexual Assault Unit Detective Nate Bohanek arrested and charged a 47 -year-old male suspect with 10 counts of Possessing Depictions of Minors Engaging in Sexually Explicit Conduct. This investigation is ongoing and additional charges are possible. Spokane Valley Sexual Assault Unit Detectives and assisting Major Crimes Unit Detectives began investigating allegations they had received regarding a male suspect. In late April, Detective Bohanek and Sergeant Rosenthal met with the suspect and conducted a consensual interview. During the interview, the male admitted to viewing pornography, but denied possessing child pornography and stated he would turn his computers over and allow them to be searched. In early May, Detective Bohanek received notification from a Spokane County Digital Forensic Specialist that videos depicting minors engaging in sexually explicit conduct were discovered on one of the computers. Deputy Bohanek requested Spokane Valley Patrol Deputies respond to the male suspect's apartment, located in the 6000 block of E. 6th Ave., where they contacted and arrested the suspect for Possession of Depictions of Minors Engaging in Sexually Explicit Conduct. The male suspect was transported to the Spokane County Jail where Detective Bohanek booked him on eight counts of 1' Degree Possession of Depictions of Minors Engaging in Sexually Explicit Conduct and one count of 2nd Degree Possession of Depictions of Minors Engaging in Sexually Explicit Conduct. Additionally, several thousand still images recovered from the suspect's computer still need to be examined in conjunction with the ongoing investigation, leading investigators to believe additional charges are possible. Neighbors & Detectives Work Together to Address Nuisance Home - 31 Firearms/Meth/ Heroin/ Vehicles Seized: The Spokane Valley Investigative Unit served a search warrant resulting in the arrest of a 32 -year-old male suspect and his 25 -year-old girlfriend, both convicted felons, for sales and possession of controlled substances and related charges; 2 of the 31 weapons were found to have been illegally converted into fully automatic weapons. The investigation of this Chronic Nuisance Property is a direct result of neighbors in the area reporting criminal/suspicious activity and working with Spokane Valley Police to achieve this successful outcome. In mid-May, Spokane Valley Investigative Unit (SVIU) Detectives and Patrol Deputies executed a search warrant at a residence located in the 10700 block of E. 29th in Spokane Valley. SVIU obtained the search warrant after receiving numerous calls from neighbors in the area reporting suspicious/drug related and other suspected criminal activity. The 22 incidents reported since the beginning of February 2018 were analyzed and an investigation was initiated. The information gained from citizens was combined with information received from Patrol Deputies and SVIU surveillance operations which Page 4 quickly led to SVIU Detective Jeff Thurman establishing probable cause to obtain the search warrant. At the residence, detectives located and seized Methamphetamine, Heroin, Suboxone, various prescription medications, scales, ledgers, syringes, stolen checks/identification and 31 firearms (17 rifles -2 were illegally converted to fire full automatic, 11 pistols and 3 shotguns). They also seized two vehicles and over $700 in cash. Investigators believe some of the firearms are stolen and are working to determine ownership/identity and who made the illegal modifications as well as any additional victims related to this ongoing investigation. Additional charges are expected. The suspects were arrested and booked into the Spokane County Jail; the male was charged with Delivery of a Controlled Substance (5 counts), Possession of a Controlled Substance (PCS) with Intent to Deliver -Methamphetamine (1 count), PCS with Intent -Heroin tine us�6 nalou, :) sunli,mual Film KI: .'�'" (2 counts), PCS with Intent Suboxone (1 count), PCS Hydrocodone (2 counts), PCS Zolpidem (1 count), PCS Alprazolam (1 count), Unlawful Use of a Building for Drug Purposes (3 counts) and Unlawful Possession of a Firearm 2"d Degree (2 counts). The female was charged with Delivery of a Controlled Substance (4 counts), PCS with Intent -Methamphetamine (1 count), PCS with Intent -Heroin (2 counts), PCS with Intent Suboxone (1 count), PCS Hydrocodone (2 counts), PCS Zolpidem (1 count), PCS Alprazolam (1 count), Unlawful Use of a Building for Drug Purposes (3 counts), Unlawfirl Possession of a Firearm 2nd Degree (1 count). Suspect Surrenders after K9 Enzo Announces Himself: Spokane Valley Deputies, responding to a person with a weapons call, learned the suspect was last seen hiding in a neighboring trailer. The trailer was surrounded and announcements to surrender were given, and ignored, until K9 Enzo announced his presence. In mid-May, prior to 6:00 p.m., Spokane Valley Deputies responded to a reported male, possibly armed with a knife, and a female arguing. When deputies arrived, they learned the 48 -year-old male suspect had assaulted his girlfriend and fought with another male at the location who tried to assist. A check of the suspect's name revealed an active felony Washington State Department of Corrections (DOC) warrant for his arrest. Deputies also learned the suspect ran into a neighboring trailer without consent and told the residents they needed to hide him because he was fighting with his girlfriend and the police were coming. The occupants of the trailer told the suspect to leave, but he refused. They confirmed he was still inside without permission, but they did not want to pursue charges. With the information that the suspect was assaultive, possibly armed and refusing to exit the trailer, Deputy McNall began drafting a search warrant and the SWAT Team was called out to assist. Once at the Page 5 scene, Deputy Pfeifer and his partner K9 Enzo took a position near the front door of the residence. As announcements advising the male suspect to surrender continued, Deputy Pfeifer gave a K9 warning advising the male that K9 Enzo would be used to find him and when found, he could be bitten. Deputy Pfeifer gave K9 Enzo a bark command causing K9 Enzo to firmly and loudly announce his presence. A few monuments later, the male suspect appeared in the doorway and surrendered. The SWAT Team response was cancelled and the suspect received medical treatment for injuries he sustained earlier during the initial fight. The male suspect was later booked into the Spokane County Jail for the felony DOC warrant. He faces new charges of Assault 4th Degree (DV) and Obstructing Law Enforcement in conjunction with this incident. Wanted Driver Arrested; Heroin, Meth, Cash and Vehicle Seized: Spokane Valley Deputies seize approximately one ounce of heroin, meth, pills, digital scales, $736 and a 2000 Acura during a traffic stop where the driver had an active felony warrant for his arrest. In addition to the warrant, the 37 -year-old male driver was arrested for possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver. In mid-May at approximately 12:30 a.m., Spokane Valley Deputy Thomas Walton checked the license plate of the vehicle in front of him while patrolling North Argonne. The return on. the Acura's license plate showed the registered owner had a felony warrant for his arrest. Deputy Walton conducted a traffic stop and contacted the driver. The Washington State Department of Corrections warrant was confirmed and driver/suspect was told he was under arrest. As the male suspect exited the vehicle, Deputy Walton observed a clear plastic baggie containing a dark substance on the driver's side floor that he believed to be heroin. During a search of the male, incident to his arrest, Deputy Walton located a glass pipe commonly used to smoke controlled substances in the suspect's pants pocket and $736 in cash in his wallet. Believing there was additional contraband in the vehicle, Deputy Walton asked the suspect for consent to search. Deputy Walton advised the suspect he planned to seek a search warrant after he declined and the suspect stated, "I got something in the car." He went on to admit having almost an ounce of heroin in the vehicle. With consent, the vehicle was searched and substances believed to be heroin and methamphetamine were recovered. The substances were later field tested and showed a presumptive positive result for heroin and methamphetamine. Additionally, digital scales and several pills, believed to be Hydrocodone, were recovered. After being advised of his rights, the male suspect admitted he was addicted to heroin and sold it to support his addiction. The drugs, paraphernalia, cash and the Acura were seized. The male suspect was transported and booked into the Spokane County Jail for Possession of a Controlled Substance with Intent to Deliver and for the felony warrant. The Spokane Valley Investigative Unit was advised and will continue the investigation, which could result in additional charges in the future. K9 Bane Concludes Search for Fleeing Driver: After a driver failed to stop for a Spokane Valley Deputy, he attempted to flee on foot when he drove down what ended up being a dead-end road; Deputy Hilton and K9 Bane located him attempting to hide in a building. In late May, at approximately 2:55 a.m., Spokane Valley Deputy James Wang observed a vehicle fail to signal as it turned from Mission onto Vercler. Deputy Wang followed the vehicle turning onto Vercler where the 30 -year-old male driver made a U-turn, went back to Mission and turned east. Deputy Wang activated his emergency lights to conduct a traffic stop, but instead of pulling over, the suspect accelerated at a high rate of speed. The suspect continued to drive recklessly and erratically as he tried to evade until he turned north on Wilbur from Mission, which comes to a dead end. The male suspect bailed out and ran north on a dirt path. He climbed over a fence, ran across 1-90 and then east through business parking lots. Deputy Wang notified the additional responding units who quickly established a Page 6 perimeter around the fenced Washington State Department of Transportation where the suspect was last seen fleeing. Several K9 announcements advising the male suspect to surrender went unanswered. With the assistance of WSP Troopers and Sheriff's Deputies, Deputy Hilton, with his partner K9 Bane, began a search for the male suspect inside the fenced area. K9 Bane led deputies around a large gravel pile, to a large wash bay and alerted on a set of doors to a building. Deputy Hilton gave several more K9 announcements advising the suspect that they knew he was inside the building and he was under arrest. The male suspect was ordered to exit the building, but he did not respond or surrender. When Sergeant Simmons and Deputy McNall attempted to open the doors, they opened slightly, but then slammed shut. Believing the male suspect was physically holding the doors preventing them from being opened, Deputy Turner responded with some tools to assist. Eventually, without the tools, the doors were pulled open. The male suspect, holding a large object in his hands, backed away further into the building, behind some barrels and did not follow commands. Deputy Hilton release K9 Bane who quickly made contact with the suspect, causing him to fall to the ground. The male suspect was given commands to show his hands and was quickly taken into custody after it was confirmed he wasn't armed. The suspect was provided medical attention prior to being transported and booked into the Spokane County Jail. While the search of the male suspect was conducted, Deputy Wang contacted the adult female passenger who stayed in the vehicle. She explained the male suspect was giving her a ride home when Deputy Wang attempted to stop the vehicle. She yelled at him several times to stop and let her get out of the vehicle after he began to flee, but he refused stating that he wasn't going back to j ail. The male suspect stated he didn't understand his rights and refused to answer any questions. He was booked into jail for Attempting to Elude a Police Vehicle, Unlawful Imprisonment, Burglary 2nd Degree, Resisting Arrest, Obstructing and Driving while Suspended/Revoked where his bond was set at $50,000. REMINDER: Criminals Look for Any Opportunity to Steal YOUR Valuables - Keep YOUR Valuables Safe, Not in Your Car: As nice warm weather approaches and the school year comes to an end, it's a wonderful opportunity to get outside and enjoy our parks, trails and waterways. Criminals know and understand this but they see a completely different opportunity, an opportunity to steal your valuables. Every spring/summer our local predatory criminals are also attracted to our parks, boat launches, and trailheads, not to enjoy them, but simply because they know everyone else will be. They know people will leave their cars parked and unattended, probably for several hours while they're out having fun, hiking, boating, and enjoying our beautiful scenery. They also know the odds are high that several of these parked cars will become their treasure-troves with electronics/wallets/purses/money/credit cards/ID and other valuables sitting in plain sight or somewhat hidden under a seat, towel or "secured" in a glovebox. These criminals are looking for any opportunity, a mere few seconds, to steal your valuables. The Spokane Valley Police Department and the Spokane County Sheriff's Office are asking for your help stopping property crimes by eliminating their opportunity. PLEASE, if at all possible, leave your valuables at home. If not, be sure to secure them in your trunk, out of sight or take them with you. Even the best, most fun, and memorable outing, can be smashed by thieves who took the opportunity to steal your valuables. Page 7 31'd Annual SWAT Team Fund "Razor" Efforts Helpful: The Spokane County Sheriff's Office SWAT Team Member's Fund "Razor" efforts raised over $5,600 for Sally's House this year. This is the third year the SWAT Team has raised funds to help Sally's House, a well deserving emergency receiving facility for children (2-12 years of age), who have been removed from their home due to abuse, neglect, abandonment or criminal activity. In May, Spokane County Sheriffs Office SWAT Team Members took some time away from training to visit with the children and staff at Sally's House. They also presented a check for $5,635, which was a result of their 3rd Annual Fund "Razor" efforts. The Fund "Razor" evolved from the SWAT Team deciding three years ago they wanted to give back as a team to the community they serve. Something to help others outside their chosen careers; something as SWAT Team Members usually do, to go above and beyond. The first year, the team donated money personally and accumulated $1,000 to donate. They choose Sally's House because they are very aware of the great work they do helping children in our community and they also know even a small donation can be a big help. The second year, wanting to do more, the idea grew and the Fund "Razor" event emerged, leading to a fun way to get others involved. The Fund "Razor" became an event where Lt. Jay McNall and Sgt. Mike Zollars volunteered to shave their beloved mustaches as motivation for team members to sell raffle tickets. The team, now curious of how the Lt. and Sgt. would look, were motivated to say the least. As the word spread, it seemed several people in and around the Spokane County Campus, family and friends also had the same curiosity. In 2017, the SWAT Team donated $3,500 to Sally's House. This year, inspired by their efforts, the Fund "Razor" raffle brought the entire team's fashionable hair styles into play. They asked the supporters to vote and select a team member who would win a free opportunity to shave their head completely bald, in addition to their donation. The Fund "Razor's" popular vote revealed Sgt. Whapeles as the winner and the SWAT Teams efforts raised $5,635 for Sally's House. This is truly what being a "Cop" really is, despite what some would lead you to believe. Giving back, helping others, strengthening community and doing so, not because it's expected or a job, but doing so because it's a desire. Thank you SWAT Team for your willingness to also be there no matter the need, regardless of the situation, and despite the danger. By Popular Vote: Sergeant Whapeles Wins! Before & After LOCK OBSERVE CARS SHOULD KEEP GARAGE ITEMS IN AND REPORT NEVER RUN DOORS CLOSED YOUR TRUNK UNATTENDED ************** ****** Page 8 Spokane County Sheriff's Office Regional Intelligence Group Spokane Valley Districts IBR Classification: Burglary 120 100 30 60 40 20 0 Y K z FEBRUARY CJ ce SEPTEMBER cc W 0 1- U 0 NOVEMBER DECEMBER —•-2015 --- 2016 - 2017 Calendar 2018 Month Count Year 2015 2016 2017 Calendar 2018 January 84 72 56 51 February 66 73 54 26 March 71 78 42 33 April 68 87 50 36 May 69 73 47 33 June 86 93 59 July 103 89 51 August 86 103 56 September 94 91 78 October 105 71 37 November 80 92 32 December 81 63 33 Grand Total 993 985 595 179 * 186 Offense: Burglary/Breaking & Entering 220 Produced: 6/13/2018 For Law Enforcement Use Only This document is confidential and may not be further disseminated or released to any unauthorized persons pursuant to RCW 42.56.420 Spokane County Sheriff's Office Regional Intelligence Group Spokane Valley Districts IBR Classification: Murder NonNeg Manslaughter 2.5 2 1.5 0.5 0 JANUARY FEBRUARY U ac 3- • 5- w - r- ¢ z _1 1...1 2 n - n ID n SEPTEMBER OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER --111--2015 —IN— 2016 X2017 Calendar 2018 Month Count Year 2015 2016 2017 Calendar 2018 January 1 February March 1 April May June July 1 1 August 1 September October 2 November 1 1 1 December 1 Grand Total 5 4 2 *IBR Offense: Murder/Non-Negligent Manslaughter 09A Produced: 6/13/2018 For Law Enforcement Use Only This document is confidential and may not be further disseminated or released to any unauthorized persons pursuant to RCW 42,56.420 Spokane County Sheriff's Office Regional Intelligence Group Spokane Valley Districts IBR Classification: Identity Theft Month Count Year 2015 2016 2017 Calendar 2018 January 9 20 February 1 24 17 March 21 13 April 16 22 May 32 21 June 18 July 23 August 9 13 September 7 17 October 7 15 November 10 19 December 8 26 Grand Total 42 233 93 *IBR Offense: Identity Theft 26F Prod Elced: 6/13/2018 For Law Enforcement Use Only This document is confidential and may not be further disseminated or released to any unauthorized persons pursuant to RCW 42.56.420 Spokane County Sheriff's Office Regional Intelligence Group Spokane Valley Districts IBR Classification: Fraud Month Count Year 2015 2016 2017 Calendar 2018 January 12 23 26 70 February 18 17 36 46 March 20 21 37 60 April 18 15 43 55 May 24 8 53 66 June 14 19 57 July 17 2.6 61 August 28 15 53 September 24 16 66 October 34 41 64 November 18 38 54 December 25 30 43 Grand Total 252 269 593 297 * IBR Offense: Fraud - Credit Card/ATM 268, Fraud - False Pretenses/Swindling/Con Games 26A, & Fraud - Impersonation 26C Produced: 6/13/2018 For Law Enforcement Use Only This document is confidential and may not be further disseminated or released to any unauthorized persons pursuant to RCW 42.56.420 Spokane County Sheriff's Office Regional Intelligence Group Spokane Valley Districts IBR Classification: DUI Month Count Year 2015 2016 2017 Calendar 2018 January 30 30 24 21 February 22 30 26 18 March 25 31 33 39 April 28 23 18 13 May 27 27 19 33 June 29 31 28 July 33 19 26 August 31 18 24 September 18 20 19 October 25 19 24 November 20 28 18 December 13 27 21 Grand Total 299 303 280 124 * IBR Offense; DUI 900 Produced: 5/13/2018 For Law Enforcement Use Only This document is confidential and may not be further disseminated or released to any unauthorized persons pursuant to RCW 42.56.420 Spokane County Sheriff's Office Regional Intelligence Group Spokane Valley Districts IBR Classification: Drugs Month Count Year 2015 2016 2017 Calendar 2018 January 2 5 19 44 February 3 30 38 March 2 2 30 63 April 4 1 37 56 May 1 5 23 35 June 2 2 20 July 3 1 21 August 4 16 26 September 5 28 25 Octcber 4 20 24 November 1 20 39 December 3 27 25 Grand Total 31 130 319 236 IBR Offense: Drug Equipment Violations 35B & Drugs/Narcotics Violations 35A Produced: 6/13/2018 For Law Enforcement Use Only This document is confidential and may not be further disseminated or released to any unauthorized persons pursuant to RCW 42.56.420 Spokane County Sheriff's Office Regional Intelligence Group Spokane Valley Districts IBR Classification: Theft From Motor Vehicle Moab Count Year 2015 2016 2017 Calendar 2018 January 134 101 98 77 February 124 76 102 33 March 96 72 94 79 April 62 134 131 62 May 84 108 79 68 June 68 177 107 July 85 139 96 August 92 131 70 September 109 103 118 October 112 124 70 November 92 153 54 December 110 118 70 Grand Total 1168 1436 1089 319 * IBR Offense: Theft From Motor Vehicle 23F Produced: 6/13/2018 For Law Enforcement Use Only This document is confidential and may not be further disseminated or released to any unauthorized persons pursuant to RCW 42.56.420 Spokane County Sheriffs Office Regional Intelligence Group Spokane Valley Districts IBR Classification: Motor Vehicle Theft Month Count Year 2015 .2016 2017 Calendar 2018 January 62 112 44 36 February 64 53 38 24 March 53 66 44 28 April 53 75 41 27 May 71 59 27 24 Junc 58 80 28 July 73 73 41 August 60 39 36 September 78 35 43 October 66 51 40 November 59 33 34 December 80 39 28 Grand Total 777 715 444 139 * IBR Offense: Motor Vehicle Theft 240 Produced: 6/13/2018 For Law Enforcement Use Only This document is confidential and may not be further disseminated or released to any unauthorized persons pursuant to RCW 42.56.420 Spokane County Sheriff's Office Regional Intelligence Group Spokane Valley Districts IBR Classification: Robbery Month count Year 2015 2016 2017 Calendar 2018 January 11 3 3 6 February 9 7 6 2 March 12 8 7 5 April 6 3 3 6 May 6 8 2 8 June 5 5 1 July 8 5 4 August 7 3 1 September 15 2 4 October 7 10 4 November 3 10 3 December 11 3 1 Grand Total 100 67 39 27 * IBR Offense: Robbery 120 Produced: 6/13/2018 For Law Enforcement Use Only This document is confidential and may not be further disseminated or released to any unauthorized persons pursuant to RCW 42.56.420 Spokane County Sheriff's Office Regional Intelligence Group Spokane Valley Districts IBR Classification: Assault Month Count Year 2015 2016 2017 Calendar 2018 January 157 131 97 98 February 141 140 95 67 March 138 145 78 112 April 131 142 90 94 May 151 143 93 87 June 140 115 93 July 143 122 95 August 136 63 73 September 130 81 92 October 149 99 88 November 124 97 86 December 127 88 85 Grand Total 1667 1366 1065 458 * IBR Offense: Aggravated Assault 13A & Simple Assault 13B Produced: 5/13/2018 For Law Enforcement Use Only This document is confidential and may not be further disseminated or released to any unauthorized persons pursuant to RCW 42.56.420 Spokane County Sheriff's Office Regional Intelligence Group Spokane Valley Districts IBR Classification: Theft 300 250 200 150 100 so a z FEBRUARY a a- w >- 1— a z _, vi SEPTEMBER OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER —4-2015 --0-2016 —,k-2017 Calendar 2018 Month Count Year 2015 2016 2017 Calendar 2018 January 233 240 205 242 February 240 208 199 172 March 258 215 211 208 April 239 232 204 203 May 226 194 235 227 June 239 263 252 July 259 242 237 August 264 203 224 September 247 222 213 October 227 232 238 November 193 244 219 December 278 225 199 Grand Total 2903 2720 2636' 1052 *188 Offense: Theft - All Other 23H, Theft - Pocket -Picking 23A, Theft - Purse -Snatching 238, Theft - Shoplifting 23C, Theft From Building 230, Theft From Coin -Operated Machine 23E, & Theft of Motor Vehicle Parts/Accessories 23G Produced: 6/13/2018 For Law Enforcement Use Only This document is confidential and may not be further disseminated or released to any unauthorized persons pursuant to RCW 42.56.420 Spokane County Sheriff's Office Regional Intelligence Group Spokane Valley Districts IBR Classification: Rape Month Count Year 2015 2016 2017 Calendar 2018 January 7 7 8 17 February 10 7 2 3 March 6 9 3 8 April 10 8 7 5 May 9 12 9 9 June 5 9 1 July 5 4 6 August 13 2 5 September 3 4 2 October 14 5 8 November 9 6 1 December 8 4 3 Grand Total 99 77 55 42 *106 Offense: Rape - Forcible 11A Produced: 6/13/2018 For Law Enforcement Use Only This document Is confidential and may not be further disseminated or released to any unauthorized persons pursuant to RCW 42.56.420 Spokane County Sheriff's Office Regional Intelligence Group Spokane Valley Districts IBR Classification: Counterfeiting Forgery Month Count Year 2015 2016 2017 Calendar 2018 January 18 14 9 18 February 18 13 11 10 March 11 25 20 22 April 7 6 20 22 May 9 10 26 20 June 9 15 15 July 12 11 21 August 12 7 14 September a 11 20 October 12 7 18 November 6 15 9 December 19 12 9 Grand Total 141 146 192 92 *IBR Offense: Counterfeiting/Forgery 250 Produced: 5/13/2018 Far Law Enforcement Use Only This document is confidential and may not be further disseminated or released to any unauthorized persons pursuant to RCW 4236.420 Spokane County Sheriffs Office Regional Intelligence Group Spokane Valley Districts IBR Classification: Destruction Damage Vandalism Month Count Year 2015 2016 2017 Calendar 2018 January 162 133 161 145 February 130 111 148 95 March 127 148 136 120 April 126 151 173 127 May 130 134 139 139 June 130 176 143 July 125 154 178 August 141 160 149 September 130 118 160 October 156 165 119 November 129 196 132 December 163 161 106 •Grand Total 1649 1807 1744 626 IBR Offense: Destruction/Damage/Vandalism 290 Produced: 5/13/2018 For Law Enforcement Use Only This document is confidential and may not be further disseminated or released to any unauthorized persons pursuant to RCW 42.56 420 S.C.O.P.E. ABANDONED VEHICLE ACTIVITY REPORT City of Spokane Valley Jan - Dec 18 Sold vehicles without new R.O.'s do not receive citations hence 2 tow columns. * Vehicles Vehicles Vehicles Citation & Hulks Stolen Total Month Total Amount Gone Tagged Towed * Towed Processed Vehicles Processed City/County Total January 50 49 9 5 5 118 JAN 192 February 48 31 6 8 5 98 FEB 162 March 54 30 4 6 19 1 114 MAR 187 April 39 24 5 8 12 88 APR 177 May 69 37 10 3 24 143 MAY 301 June 0 JUN July 0 JUL August 0 AUG September 0 SEP October 0 OCT November 0 NOV December 0 DEC Sub Totals 260 171 34 30 65 1 561 Yr Totals 1019 County Vehicles Vehicles Vehicles Citation & Hulks Stolen Total Gone Tagged Towed * Towed Processed Vehicles Processed January 45 18 1 7 3 74 February 22 7 2 8 25 64 March 37 22 4 4 6 73 April 32 18 1 3 35 89 May 38 16 4 5 95 158 June 0 July 0 August 0 September 0 October 0 November 0 December 0 Sub Totals 174 81 12 27 164 458 Totals 2018 434 252 46 57 229 1 0 1019 Year to Date Total Sold vehicles without new R.O.'s do not receive citations hence 2 tow columns. * CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: June 19, 2018 Department Director Approval Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation ® executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: EXECUTIVE SESSION: Potential Land Acquisition, Potential Litigation GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 42.30.110(1)(b) and (1)(i) PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: BACKGROUND: OPTIONS: RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: I move that Council adjourn into executive session for approximately 30 minutes to discuss potential land acquisition and potential litigation, and that no action will be taken upon return to open session. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: STAFF CONTACT: Cary Driskell ATTACHMENTS: