Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
2018, 09-04 Study Session
AGENDA SPOKANE VALLEY CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION FORMAT Tuesday, September 4,2018 6:00 p.m. CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10210 E Sprague Avenue (Please Silence Your Cell Phones During the Meeting) CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL DISCUSSION LEADER SUBJECT/ACTIVITY GOAL 1. Gloria Mantz Barker/I-90 Westbound Interchange Discussion/Information 2.Mike Stone; and Jon Mueller of Heart of the Valley Sculpture Placement Discussion/Information Architects West 3. Mike Stone Centennial Trail Contract Amendment Discussion/Information 4.Bill Helbig,Henry Allen Glenrose and Central Park Watersheds Discussion/Information Deanna Horton Flood Study 5. Erik Lamb Business License Code Amendments Discussion/Information 6.Mayor Higgins Advance Agenda Discussion/Information 7. Information Only(will not be reported or discussed):Police Department Monthly Report 8. Mayor Higgins Council Check in Discussion/Information 9.Mark Calhoun City Manager Comments Discussion/Information ADJOURN Study Session Agenda,September 4,2018 Page 1 of 1 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: September 4, 2018 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ® admin. Report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Barker/I-90 Westbound (WB) Interchange GOVERNING LEGISLATION: N/A PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: N/A BACKGROUND: Improvements at the existing Barker Road/I-90 interchanges are warranted to handle current traffic volumes. The Barker Road Bridge over 1-90 has two lanes and does not meet height clearance requirements. To add additional lanes, the existing bridge will need to be lowered or a new bridge must be constructed. The Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) is currently designing interim improvements for the eastbound interchange on the south side of the freeway. Interim improvements include a single roundabout with additional approach lanes. Similar improvements are needed for the westbound interchange. It is anticipated that interim improvements for the westbound interchange will operate satisfactory until 2028. WSDOT requested that the City manage the engineering design of the westbound interchange with WSDOT paying for the costs of the engineering phase, including internal City costs. WSDOT has Connecting Washington funds which included improvements to the 1-90 corridor from Barker Road to Harvard Road. An Interlocal Agreement will be necessary for the City to provide the services that WSDOT is requesting. A Request for Qualifications (RFQ) for the westbound interchange was advertised on June 29, 2018. HDR was selected to perform design services on the project. Staff is currently working with HDR to develop a final Scope of Work and Fee for the project. OPTIONS: Council consensus to place the above mentioned interlocal agreement as well as the contract with HDR, on the September 11, 2018 Council agenda for approval consideration; or other action deemed appropriate. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Council consensus to place the above mentioned interlocal agreement as well as the contract with HDR, on the September 11, 2018 Council agenda for approval consideration. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: WSDOT will fund the project in its entirety. STAFF CONTACT: Gloria Mantz, PE, Engineering Manager ATTACHMENTS: PowerPoint Presentation .., ., T , BarkerI- Westbound (WB _ .. ._..__ ___ , _ g. X„ 44 „--------.,,,. ,_„.- Trfai.,•<--*_.._- t 1 il Interchange 111 7I 7 lot 7�'-Jr a }vim. - Y l —-. .. 4itt _____ _ 1 ,_ , t __ _ _ __.!,.. ... _, ..,...f.. .1.44.- - ,., _,.. -.t =. ...i 11111 Project Introduction. 1 : ,: I a f rte _T .. ... _ , __ . ' .1V4V ,,, .:„,L j ,. 1 i, i 11- ZOINit II �i _r I. kr ` '+F �# �r� b• I A _ :. 4 �r 11� - .,yam.. A. '��_ R. 1, .�. • • ■it �'.; • � ....,„r., • r ''' a , -..i, 0.,_ ... ,„__ - ,-. At• . , ��: . jo •t . , , _� : 4•.' .., , st_ , . i September 4 2018 f * !, , .. ._ , , it' rot . , �ti mac.. , ,.. f • 01 044 okaneot .. Gloria Mantz, PE, Engineering Manager Valley September 4, 2018 Presentation Agenda Project Background Project Design Next Steps SP`"'okane 2 4i.p0OValley September 4, 2018 Project Existing Conditions at Barker Road I-90 Westbound Interchange Signalized Intersection Level of Service is E (AM Peak Hour) Southbound Queue is 1,200 ft (AM Peak Hour) Two Lane Bridge Over I-90 Does Not Meet Height Clearance Requirements Connecting Washington Funding Package Includes Improvements to I-90 Corridor from Barker Road to Harvard Road WSDOT Currently Designing the Barker Road I-90 Eastbound Interchange for 2019 Construction WSDOT asked the City to Manage the Design Phase of the Barker Road I-90 Westbound Interchange Interim Improvements City Manages Engineering Design — Interlocal Agreement WSDOT Manages ROW Acquisition and Construction ne WSDOT Funds All Project Phases Spol� Valley- 3 ] September 4, 2018 Project Design _.. , 1, _ i i-lie„, .., , ' - . °. . - Interim Improvementsg: Single Lane Roundabout with h `" Southbound Barker Lane Improvements r Level of Service C in 2028 _ _ s Single Lane Roundabouts -. Project Status �,`,to �.,,.„. r ate tell',„,,e� .as a• City Issued Request for -t° �` � = ,, - •w,,.�®�.„...„.s rg 9 4v � Qualifications " ._ feta g Broadway City SelectedHDR :4s _ a HDR Developing Scope and Fee ` Spokane 4 Valley September 4, 2018 Next Steps Finalize Interlocal Agreement with WSDOT and Agreement with HDR Motion Consideration - September 11, 2018 Design Project — October 2018 to June 2019 WSDOT Obtains ROW — February to May 2019 WSDOT Advertises Construction Project (Contingent on Funding) — June to July 2019 5 Valley September 4, 2018 Questions S`"'okane 6 P Valley CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: September 4, 2018 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ® admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Heart of the Valley Sculpture Placement GOVERNING LEGISLATION: Chapter 3.34 SVMC — Acceptance of donations and gifts; chapter 3.46 SVMC — Non-architectural and engineering services. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Over the years, the Spokane Valley Arts Council has donated a number of sculptures to the City for public display. BACKGROUND: The Spokane Valley Arts Council (SVAC) is a not-for-profit 501(c)(3) organization formed in 2004 for the stated purpose of working "with local businesses, civic leaders and artists to cooperatively conceive , develop and implement art-related programs and cultural activities." The SVAC has been instrumental in identifying projects to be constructed and located on property owned by the City for the cultural benefit of our citizens. Examples of their efforts include projects at CenterPlace ("Working the Line" by Jerry McKellar, "Dance of Sun and Moon" by Jerry McKellar) and City Hall ("Coup Ponies" by Jerry McKellar, "Berry Picker" by Nancy McLaughlin, and "Woman and Horse" by Ace Powell). These earlier projects occurred prior to adoption of the City's donation/gift acceptance provisions in the Spokane Valley Municipal Code. These new provisions require a process that includes an objective analysis of the proposed donation, including related costs that will result from acceptance of the donation. The process was discussed with the City Council back in May 2018 and the details are still being worked out. However, the City is in need of making a decision regarding the potential placement of the SVAC latest project, titled `Heart of the Valley" by Richard Warrington. This sculpture is 12' high and approximately 8' in diameter. It weighs in excess of 2,000 pounds. It should be noted that the City has already awarded the SVAC funding as a part of the 2018 outside agency awards. They were seeking a total of $76,100 in their application and were ultimately awarded $30,708 by Council on October 24, 2017. Staff has retained Landscape Architect, Jon Mueller of Architects West to assist the City in the siting of the sculpture and related installation costs. To date, the City has identified appropriate potential sites for placement of the piece. The City's gateway property has been suggested as a potential site and staff will be discussing this location with the Council. Timing is critical if this is to be installed this fall. OPTIONS: (1) Council discussion on location and costs; or (2) take other action as appropriate. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Consensus to authorize the City Manager to proceed with the installation of the "Heart of the Valley" sculpture at the property deemed most appropriate by Council. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Preliminary cost estimate including design consultant, installation of the sculpture, relocation of trees, install lighting and rework the existing irrigation is estimated to be approximately $27,350, of which $7,350 is for the design consultant. No funding has been budgeted for this work at this time and consequently a 2018 Budget Amendment to the General Fund will be necessary to complete the installation. STAFF CONTACT: Michael D. Stone, Director of Parks and Recreation. ATTACHMENTS: PowerPoint slides. .. j(, ,, , • 4,..1 , � a� The RICHARD WARRINGTON Work spans 45 years,and during that time,he has been quite successful in many areas from residential, corporate and public art.His work has reached four countries beyond the United States borders. Educated in both fine arts and commercial art,gives him a broad knowledge of field of art. Artist PUBLICATIONS: ' $100 . Art In America,Art News,Art Business,Sculpture Magazine,Palm Springs Life,Southwest Art,New York Times,Art&Antiques,Best of America Sculpture Artist,The Guide,Artist Showcase,Florida Design,Spokesman Review,The Inlander,Coeur D'Alene Magazine,Spokane Coeur D'Alene Living,House Trends,Triangle and Blink. SHOWS: "• 4 Art Expos(Las Vegas,New York,Miami,Fort Lauderdale,Los Angeles),International Architect Show Chicago and Art Event Atlanta. k. / ',, , . .4" f EXHIBITS: r' .t), P r, Art Current,Coeur D'Alene,ID.Art On The Avenue,Wenatchee,WA.The Kroc Center,Coeur D'Alene,ID. rl 4, 1li t. , , , INSTALLATIONS: . Port of Kennewick-FAMILY GROUP,Columbia Basin College-GEMINI 11,Family Bank-RISING SUN, - , t,',- Art on the Avenue-IMPACT,U-Haul Corporation Head Quarters-MOTHER EARTH SERIES, ...... Pk Spokane Country Club-TREE OF GROWTH,Coeur D'Alene Resort-SAILING, '"4 ! r " . Barrington Fitness Center-FANCY FREE,Tap Pharmaceutical-MIXER and GATHERING, _ ti Renaissance Place Corporate Offices-GEISHA,Central DuPage Hospital-PROTECTOR OF THE FAMILY, ,, ,. ' . ? John Price Sculpture Park-FIVE O'CLOCK PEOPLE,Goebel Construction Company- SPIRIT GOD RISING,and many others sold and installed by top galleries coast to coast. ( , v: Web site-www.rwarrington.com 4 email:warrington-r@msn.com 45,,r., immewliairos__...,., Phone 509-979-0555 III r r. iy ,,i),/ ..i'i \ , • ,.t 1-- ,, , .. .. ,,r,. , ..„. , ... \ ., .4f 4 t Ihilii, , ......., ,Ifki, \ ,0 _ , f Works of The Artist r 44 . . . , �1 , ., i Le.r Si1 il' ("lir14.-----____.7--p t' r. Our Piece : . . r t_.„, , `The Heart of the Valley' . ,. - .. . 2 il 4,0 A r.+.� �__ 1 �' 114, y j� JJ 1 47} A Ai, ' , - , • ___ II% ________=__ ,,, ,: i z e c a e L...., ss. .0,,, ..-'T. L i of th iece .�f y 3 Proposed Site Plan N CITY ,,11 GATEWAY � � SITE OFF N N i4iit OF 1-90 EXIT 285 i 1 ( _ . yea ` \- 0, , LI 4,A4 Akp 11110.f N1(16'4W ; 1110111111 / l tt, WOWit f lg.'. E. 1st Avenue - - '%\ --/;- . 4\s‘ 4 m r • • ,14 N.. , r ` ' 4.H y yr r. • l z� f' � t : } • oe r jh: :J....,g �; tai _ '`^y s - x J� 4. Atti_ �N111y � J.,-•••.•-• . . . r, ..003•' '. �� <w yr mo, €ya '''"•:,,'4 tiP '71;11•47„,,,, • -. ,. ,-, 7 ' . ,- ' .,a? ..rte.} '� 1,.„.„...t.„.... 7 ''. 4 ..— h --__ - ` -__---- rN to a �!n+.S•"' gr 444,,,,7r ( �y a „, .,., ...,....„.6.,, , ,„...,,, .. _ . . . ‘,. ,. Before • f ." . ', - • . 5 , .7 ..„., , ,:-..-1,t ,,,-,,,,,,,.. 1 t5..:A.. r -I.-- r.'..,`•-, --,,,:'-. ' "7- -..4- - { :ia • � ` . f ,w. C �,. 'Stµ . ! ko- - 'm,. sz .. 'F ,, ► .. ' gyp.. 4 y. �,- . q _ 1.1.. 7.T., ,' I 'a te,,• , ill After ., __, .. ., . , .. All.. . ., 6 7*.eder- , V f a x .-:,I: .. ,,. 7,,,, la moo °j ' . ® Vii s ,, Y �"^'�Wfa tlllYYlvl _ #' S •Y W r °wxa, ;. —w r P. -- { _ • ;� - am �" _ . .5'f%.,,.''''r, ',.k'''' f"-�1 - .- t ,,,,-04-',.'i i. g, ! ... ____. Before . ,/ 7 W r • • 4- �. Y� . P �.0 l k \ tr Al r I'M�� z ��i��i ate' • G _ .Y , . . . ... .... . •• After. ..... .„.....,.,, . 8 Anticipated MOB/ INS/GEN CON 2,000.00 DEMO/CLEAR/ DISPOSAL 2,000.00 , 1 EXCAVATION/COMPACTION 2,000.00 CONCRETE 6,000.00 #A1 \-1 ' ' IRRIGATION/SEEDING 2,300.00 ` . LIGHTING 2,000.00 lititi TREE MOVING 2,200.00 - f . ' , SUBTOTAL 18 500.00 + r'. 1 CONTINGENCY 1 ,500.00 TOTAL 20,000.00 9 lim Questions? iitio —, NO i i , IT 44 1111W ' ( dN.• e \� ,i `4,1.) N ‘'166 4E, <111111111111111Air PA' SIGN i ___ if - .ate __ is\ . ,, , l,mi � d ' a..` *rib. " ' _ - /dj9 ;, k E.1st Avenue V 10 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: September 4, 2018 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ® admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Centennial Trail Cooperative Agreement Amendment GOVERNING LEGISLATION: N/A PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Centennial Trail Cooperative Agreement approved in June 2014. BACKGROUND: The Spokane Centennial Trail comprises 37 miles of natural beauty following the historic Spokane River from the Idaho state line to Nine Mile Falls, WA. Designed for use by people of all ages and physical capabilities, the Trail is fully paved so it is ADA accessible. It is used for commuting to both work and pleasure, and wildlife observation. The Trail is marked by sites of historic and archaeological interest. With its metropolitan center section in downtown Spokane, the Centennial Trail branches out to more rural west and east endpoints, reaching into Idaho for a total of 61 miles. It mostly follows the contours of the Spokane River and joins with Lake Coeur d'Alene, Idaho, connecting along the way with the Liberty Lake Trail, Plantes Ferry Link Trail, and Cheney-Fish Lake Trail. There are over 2 million uses per year on the Trail. In 1979, Spokane County Parks proposed a bicycle/pedestrian pathway along the Spokane River. In 1984, the Spokane Valley Chamber of Commerce formed a Parks and Recreation Committee to explore this recreational possibility. In 1986, this group proposed a 10.5-mile recreational trail in the valley, naming it a Centennial Trail to coincide with Washington State's 100th birthday in 1989. In 1987, the internationally recognized architectural team, Jones & Jones, was selected to develop a master plan for the Centennial Trail. It took a community to build the trail system - fundraisers, volunteers, and local businesses. In 1991, the Friends of the Centennial Trail was created, a nonprofit Washington corporation, dedicated to the ongoing support of the public sector for the development, operation, maintenance, and enhancement of the Spokane Centennial Trail. With the cooperation of the entire community, roughly 30 miles of class 1 trail were completed by 1992. The remaining seven miles consists of class 2 and 3 trails to create a contiguous trail system. The Trail is maintained via a cooperative agreement between the Washington State Parks & Recreation Commission and the City of Spokane, Spokane County and the City of Spokane Valley through their respective parks departments with assistance by the Friends of the Centennial Trail. The original cooperative agreement did not involve the City of Spokane Valley since we did not become a City until 2003. However, since 2003, the City of Spokane Valley has been managing and maintaining our portion of the Trail just as if we were a signatory on the original cooperative agreement. On June 10, 2014 a new revised Centennial Trail Agreement which included the City of Spokane Valley was approved by the City Council. The new agreement not only included the City of Spokane Valley but it has been updated to reflect current maintenance trends, costs, trail conditions and responsibilities. It also contains a management plan exhibit and a trail maintenance fund exhibit. The current amendment being considered by the City Council simply adds the City of Liberty Lake to the agreement. The five entities, Washington State Parks, City of Spokane, Spokane County, City of Spokane Valley and the City of Liberty Lake, all share in the maintenance and operation of the Trail including the funding of the Trail Maintenance Fund. The Centennial Trail Cooperative Council has been working on this amendment for over a year. Each jurisdiction is being asked to approve this amendment. OPTIONS Consensus to place this on next week's consent agenda, or as a regular agenda item; or take other action deemed appropriate. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Consensus to place on next week's consent agenda. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: The City's Parks and Recreation budget includes $20,000 each year that is paid into the Trail Maintenance Fund administered by Spokane County for capital projects, and approximately $70,000 that is spent on the operation and maintenance of the sections of the Centennial Trail located within our corporate boundaries. No additional financial impact required for this amendment. STAFF CONTACT: Michael D. Stone, CPRP. Director of Parks and Recreation ATTACHMENTS: Draft Amendment State Parks Contract#: IA 315-128 Spokane River Centennial Trail Interagency Cooperative Agreement Revision 1 Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission City of Spokane Spokane County City of Spokane Valley City of Liberty Lake THIS AGREEMENT,is made and entered this day of , 2018, by and between SPOKANE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Washington, having offices for the transaction of business at West 1116 Broadway Avenue, Spokane, Washington, 99260 ("COUNTY") and the City of Spokane, a municipal corporation of the State of Washington, having offices for the transaction of business at 808 West Spokane Fall Boulevard, Spokane Washington 99201 ("CITY"), the City of Spokane Valley, a municipal corporation of the State of Washington, having offices for the transaction of business at 11707 E Sprague Avenue, Spokane Valley, WA 99206 ("SPOKANE VALLEY"), the City of Liberty Lake, a municipal corporation of the State of Washington, having officers for the transaction of business at 22710 East Country Vista Drive, Liberty Lake, Washington, 99019 ("LIBERTY LAKE"), and Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission, having offices for the transaction of business at 1111 Israel Road, P.O. Box 42650, Olympia, WA 98504 ("COMMISSION"). Collectively, the COUNTY, LIBERTY LAKE, CITY, SPOKANE VALLEY and the COMMISSION are referred to as the "PARTIES." WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the PARTIES are owners of land within or adjacent to the Spokane River Centennial Trail ("Trail") corridor as described in Section 3 of this Agreement; and WHEREAS, the Spokane River corridor is ecologically important, has significant potential for interpretive purposes, provides outstanding scenic beauty, tranquil surroundings and valuable historic and prehistoric features, is uniquely held in public ownership for the more than 39 miles of its length, is the common thread that links governments, communities and neighborhoods together, and has, for many thousands of years, been the corridor for commerce in the area and provides significant recreational opportunities; and WHEREAS,the PARTIES desire to provide for the development and operation of a multi- purpose trail system within the intent and authority of RCW 79A.05.030 and RCW 39.34.030 (2); and WHEREAS,the PARTIES agree that the primary development objective should be to preserve the river environment and provide facilities for public access,recreation, education and ecological and historic interpretation; and Page 2 of 25 WHEREAS,the COMMISSION is authorized under RCW 79A.05.030 and RCW 39.34.030 (2)to cooperate with the COUNTY, LIBERTY LAKE, SPOKANE and SPOKANE VALLEY in accomplishing the program herein referred to and to enter into this agreement to that end; and WHEREAS, the COMMISSION at its May 19, 1989 meeting authorized the Director or designee to enter into a long-term cooperative agreement with multiple governmental entities for the development and operation of the Spokane River Centennial Trail corridor(Trail); and WHEREAS,the PARTIES agree that the Trail can most advantageously be managed by the Commission with shared operation, maintenance and law enforcement responsibilities; WHEREAS, LIBERTY LAKE's existing municipal boundaries are located adjacent to a sizable stretch of the Spokane River Centennial Trail corridor and LIBERTY LAKE has expressed a desire to contribute to the care and maintenance of the Trail through becoming a voting member of the Coordinating Council, WHEREAS, the PARTIES wish to further amend said Spokane River Centennial Trail Agreement as set forth below. NOW THEREFORE, in order for LIBERTY LAKE to become a voting member of the Coordinating Council and in consideration of the mutual benefits to be derived, the PARTIES hereby agree the Spokane River Centennial Trail Agreement is amended as follows, with language to be deleted in stri'rcthro..gh and new language bolded and underlined: Section 1: Term The term of the Agreement shall extend through August 5th, 2034. This Agreement may be renewed in 10-year increments upon expiration of the original 20 year term by mutual agreement of the PARTIES. The COMMISSION will be given the first right to renew the Page 3 of 25 Agreement before any other party is given the opportunity to manage the Trail under agreement with the COUNTY, LIBERTY LAKE, SPOKANE and SPOKANE VALLEY. Section 2: Development and Management (a) All development and management of the Trail shall be the responsibility of the COMMISSION, unless otherwise provided herein, and the COMMISSION shall be the lead agency in preparing future development plans. Operation, including maintenance and law enforcement, shall be as set forth in Exhibit 1 - Management Plan ("Management Plan"), which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Each jurisdiction shall be responsible for all costs related to providing ordinary Trail operation, maintenance and law enforcement activities as outlined in the Management Plan. In the event of a capital repair or project (a project that falls outside of the parameters of ordinary maintenance as outlined within Exhibit 1 - Management Plan and/or exceeds $25,000 to complete), the underlying property owner or lease holder shall assume full responsibility (financially and otherwise) for project completion, barring any other agreements in place that may otherwise supersede. (b) In the event of a capital repair or project impacting the Trail and/or associated buffer lands, the responsible party may elect to petition the other PARTIES for evaluation of opportunities for cooperative funding in accordance with Exhibit 2 — Trail Maintenance Fund ("Maintenance Fund") which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Construction, alteration or repair to the Trail that is paid for in part or in whole from the Maintenance Fund will require the unanimous approval of all PARTIES. PARTIES will also agree to which entity will be responsible for carrying out the work including planning, permitting, contracting, spending, and the liability associated with such activities. No such work Page 4 of 25 will begin without the written approval of the plans by all PARTIES. Written approval can be in letter form or electronically by e-mail. In the event of an emergency requiring immediate action to protect persons or property, the PARTIES may call a special meeting or communicate by phone or e-mail to approve emergency spending. All construction or reconstruction must comply with applicable state and local laws. In the absence of cooperative funding, the responsibility for capital repairs shall fall to the underlying land owner or lease holder for the section of Trail in need of repair. The PARTIES shall meet every three years for the life of this Agreement to review the capital funding threshold (currently at $25,000 —which is presently the state threshold for capital funding). Section 3: Coordinating Council A Coordinating Council comprised of one (1) representative of each of the PARTIES, as well as a non-voting representative of the Friends of the Centennial Trail, shall be established to carry out all its responsibilities as outlined in the Management Plan and Maintenance Fund. The Coordinating Council representative from each party to this Agreement shall be as follows: • Washington State Parks: Riverside State Park Manager or Designee • Spokane County: Parks, Recreation & Golf Director or Designee • Spokane: Parks and Recreation Director or Designee • Spokane Valley: Parks and Recreation Director or Designee • Liberty Lake: Parks and Recreation Director or Designee • Friends of The Centennial Trail (non-voting): Executive Director or Designee Each representative shall have responsibility for disseminating information to other individuals and parties in his/her group and for coordinating matters for the administrative working group. Page 5 of 25 The designated representative shall have the authority to vote on fund spending priorities on behalf of the organization they represent. Section 4: Areas of Jurisdiction i. The COMMISSION is primarily responsible for management of the entire 39 mile length of the Trail and maintenance and law enforcement on or within the Trail corridor and adjacent buffer lands within Riverside State Park from Nine Mile Recreation Area to the TJ Meenach Bridge. The COMMISSION is not precluded, however, from conducting maintenance or law enforcement on the entire Trail corridor and buffer lands to protect safety and recreation on the Trail, including those areas where the COMMISSION is the underlying property owner but another jurisdiction is responsible for management, maintenance and law enforcement per this Agreement. ii. SPOKANE is responsible for the management of adjacent CITY OR PARKS DEPARTMENT-owned or leased buffer lands and maintenance and law enforcement on or within the Trail corridor located within the existing and future municipal boundaries of SPOKANE from the south end of the TJ Meenach Bridge to Centennial Trail Mile Marker 16 near"Boulder Beach"beyond the eastern municipal boundary of SPOKANE. iii. The COUNTY is responsible for management of adjacent COUNTY-owned or leased buffer lands and maintenance and law enforcement on or within the Trail corridor from Centennial Trail Mile Marker 16 near"Boulder Beach" to the Idaho border minus any portion of the Trail corridor and adjacent buffer lands that are located in SPOKANE VALLEY'S municipal boundaries (current and future) and along, adjacent to and/or within Liberty Lake's municipal boundaries (current and future)—and minus any other portions of the Trail corridor and adjacent buffer lands in this stretch that become Page 6 of 25 located within an existing or future city(s) municipal limits (i.e. annexation, incorporation). iv. SPOKANE VALLEY is responsible for management of adjacent city-owned or leased buffer lands and maintenance and law enforcement on or within the Trail corridor within its municipal boundaries (current and future). v. LIBERTY LAKE is responsible for management of adjacent city-owned or leased buffer lands and maintenance and law enforcement on or within the Trail corridor along, adjacent and/or within its municipal boundaries (current and future),which currently starts at the western line of the NE Quarter of Section 8, Township 25 Range 45 EWM and continues east along the Centennial Trail to the east line of the NE Quarter of Section 10, Township 25 Range 45 EWM. Section 5: Rules and Regulations The Trail is to be managed consistent with the provisions of chapter 79A.05 RCW and the rules and regulations adopted thereunder, unless otherwise exempted by the Director or COMMISSION. Section 6: Permits Development and maintenance along the Trail corridor shall be done in full possession of all necessary permits and licenses and in accordance with all applicable codes and regulations— including SEPA—and consistent with the overall development plans prepared by the COMMISSION. Obtaining permits will be the responsibility of the initiating party. Page 7 of 25 Section 7: Cooperative Management This Agreement allows management by the COUNTY, LIBERTY LAKE, SPOKANE and SPOKANE VALLEY of COMMISSION-owned lands; and, by the COMMISSION of COUNTY, LIBERTY LAKE, SPOKANE, and SPOKANE VALLEY-owned buffer lands within the Trail corridor. Any modifications or uses of this property for other than buffer shall be consistent with Trail development,preservation of the river corridor, and approved by COMMISSION staff prior to use,modification or construction. Use of these lands for recreation, education or river access purposes may be granted by amendment to this Agreement upon approval of the proposed plans for said property by COMMISSION staff and approval of use by the COMMISSION, and in accordance with all applicable Federal, state and local laws. Section 8: Jurisdiction Approval All new facilities and improvements made by the COMMISSION shall be consistent with Trail development,preservation of the river corridor, and approved by the applicable jurisdiction prior to construction. The COMMISSION shall be in possession of all necessary permits and licenses and shall carry out all development, maintenance and operation in accordance with all applicable Federal, state and local laws. Section 9: Hamilton Street Bridge The Hamilton Street pedestrian bridge and Don Kardong Bridge are located on SPOKANE-owned property. Routine maintenance of these bridges will be the responsibility of SPOKANE. Any repairs relating to the structural integrity of the bridges; and, if necessary, replacement will be the responsibility of SPOKANE. Page 8 of 25 Section 10: Denny-Ashlock Bridge The Denny Ashlock pedestrian bridge is located on both COMMISSION and SPOKANE VALLEY-owned property. Routine maintenance of this bridge will be the responsibility of the party in whose jurisdiction the bridge resides (presently the COUNTY for the northern half of the bridge, and SPOKANE VALLEY for the southern half of the bridge). Any repairs relating to the structural integrity of the bridge and,if necessary, replacement will be the responsibility of the COMMISSION. Section 11: Entire Agreement This Agreement grants only permission to allow the COMMISSION to use the COUNTY, LIBERTY LAKE, SPOKANE and SPOKANE VALLEY-owned property and to allow the COUNTY, LIBERTY LAKE, SPOKANE and SPOKANE VALLEY to use the COMMISSION-owned property for the purposes and on the terms and conditions herein stated. No legal or equitable title is conveyed hereby. Title to the subject property shall remain with the landowner throughout the term of this Agreement and renewal thereof. Section 12: Indemnification To the extent permitted by law, the COUNTY and/or LIBERTY LAKE, SPOKANE and/or SPOKANE VALLEY shall defend and hold harmless the COMMISSION and the State of Washington, its officers, agents, employees, successors or assigns against any and all claims suffered or alleged to be suffered on the property, except such claims which arise out of the activities of the COMMISSION, its officers, agents or employees, for which claims the Page 9 of 25 COMMISSION will defend and hold the COUNTY, LIBERTY LAKE, SPOKANE and/or SPOKANE VALLEY harmless. Section 13: Signs The COMMISSION shall erect and maintain a sign(s)identifying the COUNTY, LIBERTY LAKE, SPOKANE and SPOKANE VALLEY as cooperating agencies. Any development authorized in accordance with Section 8 herein shall be signed by the applicable jurisdiction identifying the COMMISSION as a cooperating agency. The COMMISSION will be the primary focal point and contact for signing. Section 14: Termination This Agreement may be terminated at any time by mutual written consent of all PARTIES hereto. Section 15: Modification The provisions of this Agreement may be modified at any time by the mutual consent of all PARTIES hereto. Section 16: Assignment of Rights No rights under this Agreement may be assigned without the prior written consent of the other PARTIES. This does not preclude third-party agreements which are in compliance with the Management Plan. Page 10 of 25 Section 17: Tree Removal Any tree removal shall be in accordance with landowner rules and regulations. Section 18: Non-Compliance The Trail and adjoining buffer lands are to be used by the COMMISSION for public Trail corridor purposes. Except as otherwise provided for herein, this Agreement may be terminated by any party in the event of non-compliance by any other party with the terms and conditions hereof,providing that the terminating party allow the non-complying party no less than ninety (90) days written notice of violation in which to correct any situation which is not in compliance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. If correction is not made to the satisfaction of the terminating party within the ninety (90) days, this Agreement will automatically terminate without further notice. Section 19: Removal of Improvements Unless otherwise agreed, upon termination or expiration of this Agreement, all improvements placed on property under this Agreement shall be disposed of in compliance with applicable provisions of the Revised Code of Washington. Section 20: Discover Pass LIBERTY LAKE, SPOKANE, SPOKANE VALLEY, and the COUNTY have agreed to contribute towards the operation, care and maintenance of portions of the Trail and associated buffer lands as outlined herein. In recognition of this investment,the COMMISSION agrees NOT to impose any parking or visitor fees (i.e. Discover Pass) for ordinary visitation and use of Page 11 of 25 those trailheads and other areas commonly used for parking along portions of the Trail corridor and buffer lands for which LIBERTY LAKE, SPOKANE, SPOKANE VALLEY, and the COUNTY have maintenance responsibility. Section 21: Trail Realignments and Connections (a) Trail realignments which may be completed to address safety hazards, to separate the Trail from stretches of roadway, to eliminate gaps, or to otherwise perfect the Trail shall become part of this Agreement and the Party whose geographic area includes the new trail element(s) shall assume jurisdictional responsibility for the new trail element(s)unless otherwise determined by the PARTIES through modification of the Agreement. (b)Future connections to the Trail such as neighborhood access points, local commuter trails, or regional trail connections (e.g. Fish Lake Trail) are a stated goal in the adopted Spokane County Regional Trails Plan. Trail connections shall be encouraged to be completed, but any trails which have been connected to the Centennial Trail shall not become part of this Agreement nor extend maintenance responsibilities by the PARTIES under this Agreement,unless otherwise determined by the PARTIES through modification of the Agreement. Section 22: Entities No new entities are created by this Agreement. Section 23: Agreement to be Filed The PARTIES shall record this Agreement with the Spokane County Auditor. Page 12 of 25 Section 24: Personal/Real Property/No Joint Board There shall be no common ownership of any real or personal property under the terms of this Agreement. Each party to this Agreement shall separately own its real and personal property. The Coordinating Council referenced in Section 3 will administer the provisions of this Agreement, as well as the Management Plan and Trail Maintenance Fund. Page 13 of 25 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the PARTIES have caused this Interagency Cooperative Agreement Amendment to be executed on the date and year opposite their respective signatures. NOTE: There will be a separate signature page for each entity signing the agreement. DATED: WASHINGTON STATE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION By: DIRECTOR Approved as to form: By: Michael Young Assistant Attorney General March 1, 2018 Page 14 of 25 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the PARTIES have caused this Interagency Cooperative Agreement Amendment to be executed on the date and year opposite their respective signatures. NOTE: There will be a separate signature page for each entity signing the agreement. DATED: CITY OF SPOKANE By: MAYOR Attest: Approved as to form: By: City Clerk Assistant City Attorney Page 15 of 25 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the PARTIES have caused this Interagency Cooperative Agreement Amendment to be executed on the date and year opposite their respective signatures. NOTE: There will be a separate signature page for each entity signing the agreement. DATED: CITY OF LIBERTY LAKE By: MAYOR Attest: Approved as to form: By: City Clerk City Attorney Page 16 of 25 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the PARTIES have caused this Interagency Cooperative Agreement Amendment to be executed on the date and year opposite their respective signatures. NOTE: There will be a separate signature page for each entity signing the agreement. DATED: CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY By: CITY MANAGER Attest: Approved as to form: By: Chris Bainbridge, City Clerk Office of the City Attorney Page 17 of 25 Exhibit 1 Management Plan A- PURPOSE The purpose of this Management Plan ("Plan")is to establish minimum standards for the management, maintenance and law enforcement along the Spokane River Centennial Trail ("Trail"). B -PARTIES INVOLVED This Plan is part of the Interagency Cooperative Agreement entered into by the Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission ("COMMISSION"), the City of Spokane ("SPOKANE"), Spokane County ("COUNTY") the City of Liberty Lake ("LIBERTY LAKE"), and the City of Spokane Valley ("SPOKANE VALLEY"). C - GENERAL MANAGEMENT 1. Overall management of the entire 39-mile length of the Trail will be done by the COMMISSION through the Riverside State Park Manager's office. 2. All special activities along the Trail corridor will be coordinated through Riverside State Park via Special Recreation Event permits. Special activities on the Trail within other jurisdictions will be coordinated by the COMMISSION, who will notify the parks administrative staff and the law enforcement department for the affected jurisdiction. 3. The COMMISSION may collect Special Activity Permit fees and may require an insurance binder with a minimum coverage of$1 million for parties of 20 or more people, or a damage deposit or a bond. 4. Centennial Trail Use, Approved Activities and Prohibited Activities shall be established by the Coordinating Council subject to applicable laws and shall be kept on record with the COMMISSION. 5. The Trail facility will be open to the public on existing COMMISSION posted hours. Page 18 of 25 6. Each agency is responsible for obtaining fire protection for their jurisdiction. D- GENERAL MAINTENANCE STANDARDS 1. Each agency will be responsible for general maintenance in their respective areas of the Trail as set forth in "Section 4: Areas of Jurisdiction" of the Interagency Cooperative Agreement. 2. Corrective action necessary to protect the public will be taken as soon as possible following report of damage to the jurisdiction responsible. Temporary emergency Trail closure will be imposed, if necessary, until hazardous condition is corrected(i.e. fire, flood,washout,leaning trees). Signs showing appropriate detour routes shall be placed accordingly, and notification given to the Riverside State Park Manager's office. Permanent repair or replacement, where not possible due to weather or other circumstance, will be accomplished subject to the limitations set forth in "Section 2: Development and Management" of the Interagency Cooperative Agreement. 3. Subject to the limitations set forth in"Section 2: Development and Management" of the Interagency Cooperative Agreement, each jurisdiction will be responsible for routine asphalt maintenance of the Trail as deemed necessary by the jurisdiction providing the maintenance. Routine maintenance shall include patching potholes, cutting out and/or patching large cracks or heaved pavement, sealing smaller cracks in asphalt with tar and trail shoulder repairs. Shoulder repairs include placing asphalt on trail edges where old asphalt is cracking and breaking away and placing gravel along the shoulders where erosion has occurred. Seal coating of the Trail shall be considered a capital repair. Maintenance Fund money may be used for routine asphalt repairs with the mutual agreement of all PARTIES if included within the 6-year trail capital improvement plan as outlined in Exhibit 2—Trail Maintenance Fund. 4. COMMISSION, SPOKANE, LIBERTY LAKE, SPOKANE VALLEY and COUNTY will strive to use the same standardized amenities and replacement amenities, including but not limited to signs, benches,picnic tables, bollards, mile markers and bulletin boards as determined by the Coordinating Council. The Coordinating Council will develop and may periodically update a list of options for these standardized amenities. Each agency shall bear the cost of repair and replacement of amenities as necessary, subject to the limitations set forth in "Section 3: Development and Management" of the Interagency Cooperative Agreement. Page 19 of 25 5. No amenity, other than replacement of existing amenities, shall be placed along the Trail corridor without the approval of the jurisdiction responsible for maintenance of that particular stretch of trail corridor. 6. A comprehensive record of maintenance will be kept by Riverside State Park. SPOKANE, SPOKANE VALLEY and the COUNTY agree to provide a summary of maintenance performed on the trail for the calendar year by January 31'of the following year. From time to time the COMMISSION may request written documentation from SPOKANE, LIBERTY LAKE, SPOKANE VALLEY and/or the COUNTY to verify or otherwise document maintenance work performed on the Trail as outlined herein. E- SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE ITEMS Following is a listing of specific maintenance items with comments as needed: 1. Amenities—interpretive and informational signs, benches,picnic tables, bollards, water fountains, trash receptacles, mile markers,hitching posts, rest stations and bulletin boards. 2. Bridges 3. Fencing 4. Guardrail 5. Handrail 6. Litter Control—litter will be picked up as needed to ensure that the Trail and adjacent buffer areas are kept clean. 7. Mile Markers—both posts and large mile numbers painted on asphalt will be maintained. 8. Signs—an inventory of replacement signs may be requested. 9. Snow Plowing—no snow plowing will be required on the Trail. Trail head parking lots may be plowed, depending upon user demand and resource availability by the jurisdiction responsible. 10. Sweeping—entire Trail length will be swept or blown off as needed to ensure that the Trail surface is safe for use by bicycles, skates, skate boards and other non-motorized trail uses. Page 20 of 25 11. Trail heads including facilities,parking lot and entry road—inspected and cleaned as needed to ensure that these areas are clean and safe. 12. Vandalism—the PARTIES shall notify local law enforcement and strive to inform the COMMISSION of incidents of vandalism. 13. Weed Control—in compliance with Spokane County Noxious Weed Control Board requirements, a control program along the Trail will be developed and accomplished, the cost borne by the individual jurisdictions within parameters of the Interagency Cooperative Agreement. 14. Trail shoulders will be mowed or sterilized as needed and overhanging vegetation cut back for a minimum of two feet on each side of the Trail. Vegetation will be cut back to maintain line-of-sight necessary for safety on curves. F-LAW ENFORCEMENT 1. Primary responsibility for law enforcement/major crimes shall always default to the underlying government agency as applicable by law, generally determined upon geographical location and/or type of incident (e.g. County Sheriff, City Police Department, Federal Bureau of Investigation). 2. In working collaboratively to enhance public safety for Trail users the PARTIES agree to have their respective law enforcement personnel patrol the Trail corridor within each PARTIES area of jurisdiction as outlined in Section 4 of the Cooperative Agreement. a. More specifically,law enforcement/ public safety services provided by the PARTIES shall include community caretaking functions such as but not limited to patrolling for and/or responding to reports of car prowls, homeless, loitering, disorderly conduct,indecent exposure,vandalism, and welfare checks. b. Patrols in the designated area of jurisdiction/Trail corridor is as follows: LIBERTY LAKE,with the Liberty Lake City Police; in SPOKANE, with the Spokane City Police; in SPOKANE VALLEY, with the Spokane Valley Police; in the COUNTY, with the COUNTY Parks Ranger and/or the Spokane County Sheriff; and, within Riverside State Park,with the State Parks Rangers. 3. The COMMISSION will assist within the city and County jurisdictions in normal park patrol and enforcement along the Trail. 4. Upon request of the COMMISSION, SPOKANE, SPOKANE VALLEY, LIBERTY LAKE, or the COUNTY will respond as backup during any law enforcement situation beyond park rule violations. Page 21 of 25 5. The COMMISSION may submit a request at any time to a respective law enforcement agency, to SPOKANE, SPOKANE VALLEY and the COUNTY will provide documentation of all law enforcement activities related to the Trail on a yearly basis to the Riverside State Park office. 6. Law enforcement violations attributable to the Trail are specified through WAC (Washington Administrative Code), RCW (Revised Code of Washington) or SMC (Spokane Municipal Code) and include fines if convicted. Page 22 of 25 Management Plan Attachment "A" Maps Maps shall be developed cooperatively by the PARTIES, periodically updated as needed due to municipal annexation, trail development/re-routes or other reasons, and kept on file with the Coordinating Council. Page 23 of 25 Exhibit 2 Trail Maintenance Fund A MAINTENANCE FUND FOR THE SPOKANE RIVER CENTENNIAL TRAIL SHALL BE CREATED. STATEMENT OF MUTUAL INTEREST AND BENEFIT WHEREAS,the PARTIES desire to work together to create a Trail Maintenance Fund in order to preserve the recreational values of the Centennial Trail and to bring additional recreation and economic value to the area; and WHEREAS,the Centennial Trail is a valued regional resource linking communities from Coeur D'Alene, Idaho to Nine Mile Falls; and WHEREAS,the Trail Maintenance Fund shall become a component of the Interagency Cooperative Agreement to cooperatively manage and maintain the Trail; and WHEREAS,the Interagency Cooperative Agreement spells out the obligations of the PARTIES related to routine maintenance and law enforcement; and WHEREAS,the Trail is over 20 years old and the maintenance obligations are increasing as the Trail ages; and WHEREAS,the Trail is in need of capital repairs to maintain current trail usage; NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual benefits to be derived,the PARTIES hereby agree to create a Trail Maintenance Fund for the Spokane River Centennial Trail to be jointly administered by the PARTIES for the maintenance of the Spokane River Centennial Trail. This fund is primarily intended to address preventative maintenance needs that PARTIES cannot cover as part of the routine maintenance specified in the Interagency Cooperative Agreement and to address capital repairs. I. PARTIES In addition to the PARTIES to the Interagency Cooperative Agreement, a representative of the Friends of the Centennial Trail (FCT) shall be invited to participate in a non-voting capacity when the PARTIES meet to carry out the responsibilities of the Trail Maintenance Fund outlined herein. FCT is a non-profit corporation under the laws of the state of Washington, has pledged to contribute to the Trail Maintenance Fund as resources allow, and has consistently supported the construction and maintenance of the Trail. II.RESPONSIBILITIES OF ALL PARTIES All PARTIES to the Interagency Cooperative Agreement shall: 1) Meet not less than twice a year to coordinate the management, operation, and maintenance activities for the Trail. Page 24 of 25 2) Discuss upcoming anticipated expenses and maintenance needs. 3) Develop a six(6)year Trail capital improvement plan for utilization of the Trail Maintenance Fund taking into account capital needs not covered under the terms of the Interagency Cooperative Agreement,Exhibit 1 -Management Plan. 4) Annually review,update and approve the six(6)year Trail capital improvement plan by an affirmative vote of not less than four (4) of the five (5)voting members of the Coordinating Council. 5) Make an annual lump sum payment in the amount of$20,000 to the Trail Maintenance Fund by February 1St each year the Interagency Cooperative Agreement is in place, beginning in 2015. 6) Hereby agree, that aAll expenditures from the Trail Maintenance Fund shall be unanimously approved by an affirmative vote of not less than four (4) of the five (5) voting members of the Coordinating Council the Parties prior to disbursement. This may occur through unanimous approval by the Parties of the annual review, update and approval 7) Inspect the Trail within their area of jurisdiction annually to determine maintenance needs in order to bring these issues to the semi-annual meetings for prioritization and/or funding. 8) Send a representative to each meeting with the authority to vote on spending priorities. III. SPOKANE COUNTY SHALL: 1) Establish a Trail Maintenance Fund for the collection and disbursement of monies contributed by the Parties as outlined herein in Section II, Subsection 5. 2) Be responsible for bookkeeping and the disbursement of funds approved by the parties from the Trail Maintenance Fund. 3) Prepare an Annual Report of the accounting of revenues and expenditures of the Trail Maintenance Fund. IV. CONTACTS The Trail Maintenance Fund shall be administered by the Coordinating Council. Page 25 of 25 Monroe Rd Areas of Responsibility for Trail Maintenance and Law Enforcement Under the Centennial Trail Interagency Cooperative Agreement dP, Day-Mt Spokane Area of Responsibility County Parks ) \.. 1/Washington State Parks Washington State Parks Chd,e -City of Liberty Lake Lakes/Rivers s Rd -o Fa ` z \\ V City of Spokane I=1 Spokane County Boundary ,,,,,---2-, J' Farwell Rd m` )City of Spokane Valley Hastings R ( )Spokane County g3r Map Produce:August 2017 29 Miles "r0 N Hawthorne Rd 4 ,^�.oh 4 8 Pa P m 6 e �r Seven'° S�'' 6 Riverside Fe State •r° s ark °a,. w. da Lincoln Rd a E ..iiii �y d, " Bigelow Gulch Rd ll P 7 411k Rd � Alli� �' I��'Fra ncis'A�� 29 cu 2 Wellesley Av o;. .$ tn h Wellesley Av 7. �oFh _°,2,_ o " SPOKANE ,, A Wes ,e.�` s O CI, B7 o4�� G M e=� r MIL .. L nnJP .. vi eN (15 i s i ;1 o Q _ Trent Rd 90 90 w Trails Rd n m Mission Av N - O s o SPOKANE — 4_' j o_ Broadway Av ly— a ¢- Trent AvVALLEY o = \e�ay cn ro LL PPp 1st Av » A Sprague Av '^ PP eN,ay'Bv 3rd Av LL � � z --1 __Ilti Set ey �, , « Liberty AIRWAY �� Sv° n o` v Lake Sunset a 16th A I HEIGHTS Hy c , v d n w Z o 11 ., _cF m Mcfarlane-Rd ems p 29th Av � 32nd-Av (> mac 1 L9 9o, 111 CP r IJ do IA 315-128 Revision 1 ,-,0): Exhibit 1 - Attachment A 902 °a- a CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: September 4, 2018 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ® admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Glenrose and Central Park Watersheds Flood Study GOVERNING LEGISLATION: • Chapter 21.30 Spokane Valley Municipal Code; • Code of Federal Regulations, Title 44: Emergency Management and Assistance: • Chapter 1, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Department of Homeland Security • Part 60: Criteria for Land Management and Use • Part 65: Identification and Mapping of Special Hazard Areas • Part 70: Procedure for Map Correction • Part 72: Procedures and Fees for Processing Map Changes PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: • September 6, 2016: Project was presented as an informational item included in the 2017- 2022 Stormwater Capital Improvement Plan • September 13, 2016 Admin Report 2017-2022 Stormwater Capital Improvement Plan • September 27, 2016, Motion passed to approve the 2017-2022 Stormwater Capital Improvement Plan PURPOSE: The Glenrose and Central Park watersheds in the southwest corner of the City include FEMA Special Flood Hazard Areas (100-year floodplains) designated as Zone A's. These Zone A floodplains were not delineated using rigorous scientific methods and so do not have water flow information, water surface elevations and, in many places do not have accurate floodplain boundaries. These deficiencies have created the following problems which this proposed study plans to address: • Due to a lack of water flow information, when citizens who are shown to be in a floodplain need water surface elevations for filling out FEMA's elevation certificates or locating finished floors in new buildings, we have been estimating these elevations using flood flows from a draft watershed study performed by Spokane County in 2002. It is believed these flows are very conservative resulting in estimated water surface elevations that could be much higher than they actually are, causing flood risks to be over-estimated and finished floors to be higher than needed. This study will provide accurate flood water surface elevations. • FEMA flood insurance is rated by risk level. Without accurate flood water surface elevations, people who have to pay flood insurance can't get accurately rated insurance. These customers could be paying too much for their insurance because the Base Flood Elevations could be too high, estimating the risk level to be higher than it actually is. • Due to inaccurate flood boundaries, the flood risk in these basins is not correctly portrayed. It is estimated that up to 20 properties are shown to be in floodplains that actually are not and thus are unnecessarily paying for flood insurance. Also, there are properties that have floodplains on them that could be too large thus overly encumbering the property. Lastly, it is possible that there are properties which could really be in a flood hazard area but are not shown in one and so do not have needed flood insurance. This study will provide accurate floodplain boundaries. • The lack of accurate and official flood information also complicates development because our floodplain regulations require subdivisions proposed on parcels with floodplains to include water surface elevations. This study will provide those water surface elevations. Due to these issues, the floodplains are proposed to be studied and remapped. PROJECT HISTORY: • June 2009: City met with FEMA representatives during which the Glenrose channel was identified as needing to be remapped. • September 2016: This project was presented and approved by the City Council as part of the Stormwater CIP. • June 2017: City published Request for Qualifications (RFQ) for the Glenrose & Central Park Floodplain Delineation and received 3 Statements of Qualifications (SOQ). • August 2017: Project selection committee (City of Spokane, Spokane County and Spokane Valley) reviewed and scored SOQs and selected the most qualified consultant. • July 2018: Consultant's Scope of Work, Cost, and proposed Schedule was reviewed and accepted. OPTIONS: Seeking Council consensus to include a motion consideration on the September 11, 2018, agenda for Council consideration. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Seeking Council consensus to present motion to award the Consultant Contract at the September 11, 2018 meeting. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Anticipated funding timeline - project expected to take 5 or more years to complete, funded through 402 Stormwater Utility: o Year 2018 $50,000 o Year 2019 $76,500 o Year 2020 $42,700 o Year 2021 $62,000 o Year 2022+ $30,700 $261,900 over the anticipated 5+ year study STAFF CONTACT: • Bill Helbig, City Engineer • Henry Allen, Senior Engineer • Deanna Horton, Admin Assistant, Certified Floodplain Manager ATTACHMENTS: • PowerPoint presentation • Consultant Contract Glenrose-CentralParkWatersheds "arm X11 FLOOD mein4,0i; INSURANCE- TU DY _ 4'*,74 -7-74 Oho : .tt6' .440.3) A ITTedlirdirl&41 September 4, 2018 Henry Allen, PE, Senior Engineer Deanna Horton, Admin Assistant, CFM Slide #1 Bill Helbig, PE, City Engineer September 4, 2018 Watersheds Glenrose l ood 9 Square Miles N Central Park Liberty Lake 3.3 Square Miles Spokane Valley Spokane Central.;J Basin Glenrose Basin Legend Spokane Valley Border Spokane County Municipal Boundaries Glenrose&Central Park Basins Slide #2 September 4, 2018 Flow Patterns j;` j �l 1ar' �, x Legend :9.0 Municipal Boundaries '? ' Glenrose - W�tersPaeds ��-� � � -m.. 11,,17, mGLENIROSE v& `. ..: Generally North � 1TR4LP.ARK -;..'41,—. • eta! SF HA �° N 177 ■ Central Park - 1.111.C. �` 4r: ' Generally Northwest ,gar; - is 10 'c�ri x ' Flood Hazard ,...„,„..., . . ..:, ...7,....._, 1::.6 ' i. rY: t R....".: `- .0..ac.. . c,h"� S . w 4. Q. s. a• Special Flood Hazard •;;;,,,,-.-..,.7........;.!._:,:....„v.,;,=+.:-.„,..:,,,,,•7, -..! / rq7 n 4 {i � eArea (SERA) .pe. l $' : ■ ■ Zone A (Approximate) Qffi _. Flow Joins at . . t . ,,.. , , . , ,. ...,.... 0. ••.:.'4 4-,F,v,,:„. .....•...A.6.:4-'--j. '.'„krir--,:t..i..j...?*::--.........r.:-.__.._,,,, .,i-,1,,___,...:. .1.,3,n 4 4,k an- t Slide #3 • September 4, 2018 FEMA Map I! tIs nified � v • E Biw AVE JE lu � x ,�y ZONE XeA .. i nT 100 Year m� Millw AVENUE 1 E N C1'1'Y OF SPOKANE VALLEY TH ,,. 1- • Zone X saa - 500 Year , . ' RI Central Park I' E 14TH L.11E E TI, wrIf L.{r o m E Phil! AY -.551 ',L. '- Y Ar I q E3LJ I ZONE W G .n} �• ` 1iTN E1 I I n E 17TH AVENUE 7I K ¢ L d i ND = + e III n a / J ni 6, yy W, W AVE Z Glenrose E ryTx 4 w••� t 4.•r • E 10TH A E Slide #4 e , $. September 4, 2018 FEMA Map Issues l rb aT ri f I. 4 sr- iii Actual topography suggests _ ;` split doesn't occur, but rather �. 3 ,r all flow goes northeast 0ado_ ..._..., ` , ., ir Impossible flood depths, l ` ,* boundaries not accurate 0 1W Akio 1 ■ Zone A doesn't have flood N. .E - elevations which are required ` - � , for above-floor elevations, flood - 4611% IT 000, , - risk determination, and flood _ ., , el 0- -'1 insurance premiums. .' - Awa o Foot r .:,:. _ ,44ir,,,,;gi 2,,,,,-: /two- '6.4..t. Elev. Diff ,.# ii _ir Slide #5 ,-- 002 r September 4, 2018 ;4;) Data Issues Amp No official flood flows. When needed, use flows from draft ' „ ' Glenrose/Central Park Stormwater Management Plan (Sp. Co. 2002). In plan, calculated 100-year flow for Glenrose = 454 cubic feet per second = 70 bathtubs per second =- 4 4 100-year flow very conservative, calculations do not take into account detention basins, retention basins or the hundreds of drywells in the basin ■ Also, the Stormwater Management Plan states (page 3-1): "Stormwater runoff in the Glenrose and Central Park Watersheds runs off of property and hillsides, ponds in low-lying areas and infiltrates into the ground. Over much of the watershed during intense storms or during snowmelt, localized flooding does occur, however, large flood flows, with contributions from all parts of the watershed does not occur." Slide #6 September 4, 2018 J Proposed Project Detailed Analysis & Mapping of the Glenrose and Central Park Flood Areas Results in a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) from FEMA Officially Revises the Floodplain Boundaries S`"'Poane Slide #7 4i000Valley September 4, 2018 Project History June 2009: City met with FEMA representatives during which the Glenrose channel was identified as needing to be remapped September 2016: Project was presented and approved as part of the Stormwater CIP (Cost = $150,000, Time to Complete = 3 years) • June 2017: Published Request For Qualifications (RFQ) for the Glenrose & Central Park Floodplain Delineation; Received 3 Statements of Qualifications (SOQ) • August 2017: Selection committee (City of Spokane, Spokane County and Spokane Valley) reviewed and scored SOQs and selected most qualified consultant • July 2018: Consultant's Scope of Work was accepted; many reviews and revisions (Cost = $262,000, Time to Complete = 5+ years) S`"'Poane Slide #8 4000Valley September 4, 2018 Key Changes : 2016 — 2018 Based on input from County and City of Spokane (experienced with flood studies), increased hours on several tasks • Requested more thorough research and field work, resulting in better- documented and possibly lower flood flows into City of Spokane Valley • Use of 2018 costs rather than 2016 costs • Based on other projects, increased project life from 3 years to 5+ years • Consultant will take lead role in project management Consultant utilizing a local firm to conduct public meetings and outreach S`"'Poane Slide #9 4000Valley September 4, 2018 Anticipated StudyProgression Litak 2018 Data collection and review Infiltration testing (ponds, drywells) Cross section and structure survey 2019 Kick-off meeting with site visit and reconnaissance Open house public meeting presenting project Topographic data development Data collection summarization and jurisdiction coordination Hydrologic analysis and second site visit 2020 Hydraulic analysis Public meeting presenting hydrology and initial hydraulic results 2021 Develop floodplain maps Finalize hydrologic and hydraulic analyses Public meeting concerning maps Initial submittal to FEMA Develop flood mitigation recommendations 2022+ Cycles of submittals to FEMA and revisions based on their review comments Hydrology model training for engineers and jurisdictions „„ , diod 2018+ Coordination meetings, project management S JO ane Slide #10 Valley- September 4, 2018 H Questions? Seeking Council consensus to present I °O' motion to award the Consultant Contract Liberty Lake Spokane Valley at the September Spokane 11, 2018 meeting Central Park Basin Glenrose Basin Legend Spokane County Spokane Valley Border p Municipal Boundaries r�Glenrose&Central Park Basins Slide #11 September 4, 2018 AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WEST Consultants,Inc. Glenrose and Central Park Basins Floodplain Delineation Contract No. 18. THIS AGREEMENT is made by and between the City of Spokane Valley,a code City of the State of Washington,hereinafter"City"and WEST Consultants, Inc.,hereinafter"Consultant,"jointly referred to as "Parties." IN CONSIDERATION of the terms and conditions contained herein, the Parties agree as follows: 1.Work to Be Performed. Consultant shall provide all labor,services,and material to satisfactorily complete the Scope of Services, attached as Exhibit A. A. Administration. The City Manager or designee shall administer and be the primary contact for Consultant. Prior to commencement of work,Consultant shall contact the City Manager or designee to review the Scope of Services, schedule, and date of completion. Upon notice from the City Manager or designee, Consultant shall commence work, perform the requested tasks in the Scope of Services, stop work, and promptly cure any failure in performance under this Agreement. B. Representations. City has relied upon the qualifications of Consultant in entering into this Agreement. By execution of this Agreement,Consultant represents it possesses the ability,skill,and resources necessary to perform the work and is familiar with all current laws, rules, and regulations which reasonably relate to the Scope of Services. No substitutions of agreed-upon personnel shall be made without the prior written consent of City. Consultant represents that the compensation as stated in paragraph 3 is adequate and sufficient for the timely provision of all professional services required to complete the Scope of Services under this Agreement. Consultant shall be responsible for the technical accuracy of its services and documents resulting therefrom, and City shall not be responsible for discovering deficiencies therein. Consultant shall correct such deficiencies without additional compensation except to the extent such action is directly attributable to deficiencies in City-furnished information. C. Standard of Care. Consultant shall exercise the degree of skill and diligence normally employed by professional consultants engaged in the same profession,and performing the same or similar services at the time such services are performed. D. Modifications. City may modify this Agreement and order changes in the work whenever necessary or advisable, Consultant shall accept modifications when ordered in writing by the City Manager or designee, so long as the additional work is within the scope of Consultant's area of practice. Compensation for such modifications or changes shall be as mutually agreed between the Patties. Consultant shall make such revisions in the work as are necessary to correct errors or omissions appearing therein when required to do so by City without additional compensation. 2. Term of Contract. This Agreement shall be in full force and effect upon execution and shall remain in effect until completion of all contractual requirements set forth in the Scope of Services have been met as Agreement for Professional Services(with professional liability coverage) Page 1 of 6 determined by City. The project is anticipated to take at least five years to complete. Either Party may terminate this Agreement for material breach after providing the other Party with at least 10 days' prior notice and an opportunity to cure the breach. City may,in addition,terminate this Agreement for any reason by 10 days'written notice to Consultant. In the event of termination without breach,City shall pay Consultant for all work previously authorized and satisfactorily performed prior to the termination date. 3. Compensation. City agrees to pay Consultant no more than $262,000,(which includes Washington State Sales Tax if any is applicable)as full compensation for everything done under this Agreement,as set forth in Exhibit B. Consultant shall not perform any extra, further, or additional services for which it wiII request additional compensation from City without a prior written agreement for such services and payment therefore. The Parties may agree to project change requests to amend the Scope of Services and compensation amount(s) as provided in Exhibit A and Exhibit B. 4. Payment. Consultant shall be paid monthly upon presentation of an invoice to City. Applications for payment shall be sent to the City Finance Department at the below-stated address. City reserves the right to withhold payment under this Agreement for that portion of the work(if any)which is determined in the reasonable judgment of the City Manager or designee to be noncompliant with the Scope of Services, City standards, City Code, and federal or state standards. 5. Notice. Notices other than applications for payment shall be given in writing as follows: TO THE CITY: TO THE CONSULTANT: Name: Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Name: Henry Hu,VP/Sr. Project.Manager Phone: (509) 720-5000 Phone: (425)646-8806 Address: 10210 East Sprague Avenue Address: 12509 Bel-Red Road, Ste. 100 Spokane Valley,WA 99206 Bellevue, WA 98005 6.Applicable Laws and Standards. The Parties,in the performance of this Agreement,agree to comply with all applicable federal,state,and local laws and regulations. Consultant warrants that its designs,construction documents, and services shall conform to all federal, state, and local statutes and regulations. 7. Certification ReEarding Debarment, Suspension, and Other Responsibility Matters — Primary Covered Transactions. A.By executing this Agreement,the Consultant certifies to the best of its knowledge and beliefthat it and its principals: 1. Are not presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from covered transactions by any federal department or agency; 2. Have not within a three-year period preceding this proposal been convicted of or had a civil judgment rendered against them for commission of fraud or a criminal offense in connection with obtaining, attempting to obtain, or performing a public (federal, state, or local)transaction or contract under a public transaction;violation of federal or state antitrust statutes or commission of embezzlement,theft,forgery,bribery,falsification or destruction of records, making false statements, or receiving stolen property; 3. Are not presently indicted for or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a governmental entity (federal, state, or local) with commission of any of the offenses enumerated in Agreement for Professional Services(with professional liability coverage) Page 2 of 6 paragraph(A)(2)of this certification; and 4. Have not within a three-year period preceding this application/proposal had one or more public transactions(federal, state, or local)terminated for cause or default. B. Where the prospective primary participant is unable to certify to any of the statements in this certification, such prospective participant shall attach an explanation to this Agreement. 8.Relationship of the Parties. It is understood and agreed that Consultant shall be an independent contractor and not the agent or employee of City,that City is interested in only the results to be achieved, and that the right to control the particular manner,method,and means in which the services are performed is solely within the discretion of Consultant. Any and all employees who provide services to City under this Agreement shall be deemed employees solely of Consultant. The Consultant shall be solely responsible for the conduct and actions of all its employees under this Agreement and any liability that may attach thereto. 9. Ownership of Documents. All drawings, plans, specifications,and other related documents prepared by Consultant under this Agreement are and shall be the property of City, and may be subject to disclosure pursuant to chapter 42.56 RCW or other applicable public record laws. The written, graphic, mapped, photographic, or visual documents prepared by Consultant under this Agreement shall, unless otherwise provided, be deemed the property of City. City shall be permitted to retain these documents, including reproducible camera-ready originals of reports,reproduction quality mylars of maps,and copies in the form of computer files, for the City's use. City shall have unrestricted authority to publish, disclose, distribute, and otherwise use, in whole or in part,any reports, data, drawings, images, or other material prepared under this Agreement,provided that Consultant shall have no liability for the use of Consultant's work product outside of the scope of its intended purpose. 10.Records. The City or State Auditor or any of their representatives shall have full access to and the right to examine during normal business hours all of Consultant's records with respect to all matters covered in this Agreement. Such representatives shall be permitted to audit,examine,make excerpts or transcripts from such records,and to make audits of all contracts, invoices,materials,payrolls,and record of matters covered by this Agreement for a period of three years from the date final payment is made hereunder. 11. Insurance. Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of the Agreement, insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damage to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by Consultant, its agents, representatives, employees,or subcontractors. A. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Consultant shall obtain insurance of the types described below: 1.Automobile liability insurance covering all owned,non-owned,hired,and leased vehicles. Coverage shall be written on Insurance Services Office(ISO)form CA 00 01 or a substitute form providing equivalent liability coverage. 2. Commercial general liability insurance shall be at least as broad as ISO occurrence form CG 00 01 and shall cover liability arising from premises, operations, stop-gap independent contractors and personal injury,and advertising injury. City shall be named as an additional insured under Consultant's commercial general liability insurance policy with respect to the work performed for the City using an additional insured endorsement at least as broad as ISO CG 20 26. 3.Workers' compensation coverage as required by the industrial insurance laws of the State of Washington. Agreement for Professional Services(with professional liability coverage) Page 3 of 6 4.Professional liability insurance appropriate to Consultant's profession. B.Minimum Amounts of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain the following insurance limits: 1.Automobile liability insurance with a minimum combined single limit for bodily injury and property damage of no less than$1,000,000 per accident. 2.Commercial general liability insurance shallbe written with limits no Iess than$1,000,00() for each occurrence, and $2,000,000 for general aggregate. 3. Professional liability insurance shall be written with limits no less than $1,000,000 per claim and $1,000,000 policy aggregate limit. C. Other Insurance Provisions. The policies are to contain,or be endorsed to contain,the following provisions for automobile liability,professional liability,and commercial general liability insurance: I.Consultant's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance with respect to the City. Any insurance,self-insurance,or insurance pool coverage maintained by City shall be in excess of Consultant's insurance and shall not contribute with it. 2. Consultant shall fax or send electronically in .pdf format a copy of insurer's cancellation notice within two business days of receipt by Consultant. 3.If Consultant maintains higher insurance limits than the minimums shown above,City shall be insured for the full available limits of commercial general and excess or umbrella liability maintained by Consultant, in-espective of whether such limits maintained by Consultant are greater than those required by this Agreement or whether any certificate of insurance furnished to the City evidences limits of liability lower than those maintained by Consultant. 4. Failure on the part of Consultant to maintain the insurance as required shall constitute a material breach of the Agreement,upon which the City may,after giving at least five business days' notice to Consultant to correct the breach, immediately terminate the Agreement,or at its sole discretion, procure or renew such insurance and pay any and all premiums in connection therewith, with any sums so expended to be repaid to City on demand, or at the sole discretion of the City, offset against funds due Consultant from the City. D.Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M.Best rating of not less than A:VII. E. Evidence of Coverage. As evidence of the insurance coverages required by this Agreement, Consultant shall furnish acceptable insurance certificates to the City Clerk at the time Consultant returns the signed Agreement,which shall be Exhibit C. The certificate shall specify all of the parties who arc additional insureds,and shall include applicable policy endorsements,and the deduction or retention level.Insuring companies or entities are subject to City acceptance. If requested,complete copies of insurance policies shall be provided to City. Consultant shall be financially responsible for all pertinent deductibles, self-insured retentions, and/or self-insurance. 12.Indemnification and Hold Harmless. Consultant shall,at its sole expense,defend,indemnify,and hold harmless City and its officers, agents, and employees, from any and all claims, actions, suits, liability, loss, costs,attorney's fees,costs of litigation,expenses,injuries,and damages of any nature whatsoever relating to or Agreement for Professional Services(with professional liability coverage) Page 4 of 6 arising out of the wrongful or negligent acts, errors, or omissions in the services provided by Consultant, Consultant's agents, subcontractors, subconsultants, and employees to the fullest extent permitted by law, subject only to the limitations provided below. Consultant's duty to defend, indemnify,and hold City harmless shall not apply to liability for damages arising out of such services caused by or resulting from the sole negligence of City or City's agents or employees pursuant to RCW 4.24.115. Consultant's duty to defend, indemnify,and hold City harmless against liability for damages arising out of such services caused by the concurrent negligence of(a) City or City's agents or employees,and (b) Consultant, Consultant's agents, subcontractors, subconsultants, and employees shall apply only to the extent of the negligence of Consultant, Consultant's agents, subcontractors, subconsultants, and employees. Consultant's duty to defend,indemnify,and hold City harmless shall include,as to all claims,demands,losses, and liability to which it applies,City's personnel-related costs,reasonable attorneys'fees,the reasonable value of any services rendered by the office of the City Attorney, outside consultant costs, court costs, fees for collection, and all other claim-related expenses. Consultant specifically and expressly waives any immunity that may be granted it under the Washington State Industrial Insurance Act,Title 51 RCW. These indemnification obligations shall not be limited in any way by any limitation on the amount or type of damages, compensation, or benefits payable to or for any third party under workers' compensation acts, disability benefit acts, or other employee benefits acts. Provided, that Consultant's waiver of immunity under this provision extends only to claims against Consultant by City, and does not include, or extend to, any claims by Consultant's employees directly against Consultant. Consultant hereby certifies that this indemnification provision was mutually negotiated. 13.Waiver. No officer, employee, agent, or other individual acting on behalf of either Party has the power, right, or authority to waive any of the conditions or provisions of this Agreement. A waiver in one instance shall not be held to be a waiver of any other subsequent breach or nonperformance. All remedies afforded in this Agreement or by law shall be taken and construed as cumulative and in addition to every other remedy provided herein or by law. Failure of either Party to enforce at any time any of the provisions of this Agreement or to require at any time performance by the other Party of any provision hereof shall in no way be construed to be a waiver of such provisions nor shall it affect the validity of this Agreement or any part thereof. 14. Assignment and Delegation. Neither Party shall assign, transfer, or delegate any or all of the responsibilities of this Agreement or the benefits received hereunder without prior written consent of the other Party. 15.Subcontracts. Except as otherwise provided herein,Consultant shall not enter into subcontracts for any of the work contemplated under this Agreement without obtaining prior written approval of City. 16. Confidentiality. Consultant may, from time-to-time,receive information which is deemed by City to be confidential. Consultant shall not disclose such information without the prior express written consent of City or upon order of a court of competent jurisdiction. 17. Jurisdiction and Venue. This Agreement is entered into in Spokane County, Washington. Disputes between City and Consultant shall be resolved in the Superior Court of the State of Washington in Spokane County. Notwithstanding the foregoing,Consultant agrees that it may,at City's request,be joined as a party in any arbitration proceeding between City and any third party that includes a claim or claims that arise out of,or that are related to Consultant's services under this Agreement. Consultant further agrees that the Arbitrator(s)' Agreement for Professional Services(with professional liability coverage) Page 5 of 6 decision therein shall be final and binding on Consultant and that judgment may be entered upon it in any court having jurisdiction thereof. 18. Cost and Attorney's Fees. The prevailing party in any Iitigation or arbitration arising out of this Agreement shall be entitled to its attorney's fees and costs of such litigation(including expert witness fees). 19. Entire Agreement. This written Agreement constitutes the entire and complete agreement between the Parties and supersedes any prior oral or written agreements. This Agreement may not be changed,modified,or altered except in writing signed by the Parties hereto. 20. Anti-kickback, No officer or employee of City, having the power or duty to perform an official act or action related to this Agreement shall have or acquire any interest in this Agreement, or have solicited, accepted, or granted a present or future gift, favor, service, or other thing of value from any person with an interest in this Agreement. 21.Business Registration. Consultant shall register with the City as a business prior to commencement of work under this Agreement if it has not already done so. 22.Severability. If any section,sentence,clause,or phrase of this Agreement should be held to be invalid for any reason by a court of competent jurisdiction,such invalidity shall not affect the validity of any other section, sentence, clause, or phrase of this Agreement. 23. Exhibits. Exhibits attached and incorporated into this Agreement are: A. Scope of Services B. Fee proposal C. Insurance Certificates The Parties have executed this Agreement this_day of ,20_ CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Consultant: Mark Calhoun, City Manager By: Its: Authorized Representative ATTEST: Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Office of the City Attorney Agreement for Professional Services(with professional liability coverage) Page 6 of 6 Exhibit A Scope of Services for PROJECT: Glenrose and Central Park Basins Floodplain Delineation Abbreviated: G-CP FIS SOW Prepared for: City of Spokane Valley Prepared by: WEST Consultants, Inc, 12509 Bel-Red Road, Suite 100 Bellevue, WA 98005 PREAMBLE Purpose: The purpose of this project is to delineate the 1-percent annual chance flood (also referred to as the base flood or 100-year flood) and the 0.2-percent-annual-chance (or 500-year) flood in portions of the Glenrose and Central Park basins using detailed methods and then, for these studied areas, revise the special flood hazard area (SFHA) delineations on the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMS) accordingly. This study will result in either a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) or Physical Map Revision (PMR) depending on FEMA discretion. These basins include areas within the City of Spokane Valley (City), City of Spokane (Spokane) and Spokane County (County). Parties to this Project: • Consultant: WEST Consultants, Inc. • Participating Jurisdictions: City and possibly in the future,through an interagency agreement, Spokane and/or the County. • Reviewing Jurisdictions: (at least) Spokane, the County and the Washington Department of Ecology (Ecology). Glenrose and Central Park LOMR/PMR Scope of Work 1 • Advisory Group: a collection of up to six individuals volunteering to provide non-binding advice, review and comment to improve the quality of the project. The Parties shall cooperatively select the members of the advisory group in the manner they determine is appropriate. Project Lead: WEST Consultants is the project lead (Consultant) and shall perform all tasks described below. Background: The majority of the 100-year floodplains within the Glenrose and Central Park basins are currently designated as Zone A and were delineated using approximate methods so no flood water depths or base flood elevations are shown within the zones. In many places, these FEMA-designated, effective floodplain boundaries (some effective since at least 1992) do not match the existing topography so it is possible there are homeowners paying for flood insurance that are not in a flood zone. To provide better flood risk data for floodplain management and flood insurance purposes, there is a need to delineate detailed, accurate floodplain boundaries. Figure 1 shows the watershed boundaries of the Glenrose and Central Park basins. The Glenrose basin is approximately nine square miles. The majority of the basin is within the County and Spokane and only the most downstream portion is within the City. The area within the City and Spokane is mostly urbanized, while the area within the County is mostly rural. The stormwater in the drainage basin flows south to north, originating in the County and in Spokane, and flows through the southwestern corner of the City before exiting into Spokane to the west. While topography shows evidence of historic flows, it appears that most water is infiltrated into the ground prior to entering the City boundaries. In the City, groundwater flows appear to surface just southwest of 9th Avenue and Carnahan Road in a pond and overflow to the north into a system designed for local neighborhood stormwater flows. The Central Park basin is approximately 3.3 square miles and covers areas within the unincorporated County and the City. The headwaters of the basin are within the rural and undeveloped areas. The lower areas are primarily single-family residential. The stormwater in the County portion of the basin flows generally south to north, and then travels east to west through the City before joining Glenrose Creek. The Glenrose and Central Park special flood hazard areas are currently mapped primarily as an approximate Zone A on FEMA FIRM panels 530630-0568D, -0564D, -0563D, and -07270. Some areas are mapped as shaded Zone X, defined as areas of 0.2% annual chance flood, or areas of 1% annual chance flood with average depths of less than 1 foot or with drainage areas less than 1 square mile. Project Tasks Tasks necessary for the project include: Task 1: Data Collection and Review Glenrose and Central Park LOMR/PMR Scope of Work 2 Task 2: Kick-off Meeting, Initial Site Visit, and Reconnaissance Task 3: Topographic Data Development Task 4: Data Collection Summarization and Jurisdiction Coordination Task 5: Hydrologic Analysis and Second Site Visit Task 6: Hydraulic Analysis Task 7: Floodplain Mapping Task 8: LOMR/PMR Submittal Task 9: FEMA Reviews Task 10: Public Outreach Task 11: Meetings Task 12: HSPF Model Training Task 13: Flood Mitigation Recommendations Task 14: Project Management Tasks 1 through 9 are generally sequential; Task 10 through Task 14 will be occurring at different points throughout the project. The Consultant shall participate in each Task as further described herein. All analyses and the floodplain mapping will be done in accordance with FEMA's Guidelines and Specifications for flood Hazard Mapping. Flood flows will be developed for the 10-, 2-, 1- and 0.2-% annual chance flood (the 10-, 50-, 100- and 500-year storms, respectively) at appropriate locations. Floodplains will be delineated for the 1- and 0.2-% annual chance flood (the 100- and 500-year floods, respectively) and floodways will be delineated where appropriate for the 1% annual chance flood. The City is relying on the Consultant's expertise and years of experience on working with FEMA on floodplain studies in the Consultant's development and confirmation of the following scope, schedule and fees to cover all submittals, resubmittals, communications, coordination, documentation and additional work necessary for the Consultant and all subconsultants to complete each task. Project Duration The Agreement shall continue until all work set forth herein is completed. The Parties anticipate that it will take at least five years to complete this project. Fees Fees are included in the Exhibit B. Project Revisions Glenrose and Central Park LOMR/PMR Scope of Work 3 If either Spokane and/or the County decide to participate in this project then at that time the scope, schedule (where provided) and the fees shall be reviewed and revised as needed and changes documented in writing with a Project Change Request or other appropriate form of agreement prepared by the Consultant (see Task 14) and agreed to and signed by the Consultant, City, and the joining members. As is typical of complex flood insurance studies, the scope, schedule and the fee for each task is an estimate and is understood to be flexible because the results of previous tasks in the sequence may result in an adjustment of the scope, schedule and fee in successive tasks and/or a revisiting of a previous task. If, prior to beginning work on a task or portion of a task, the Consultant, or City realizes that the scope, schedule and/or fee needs to be revised then work on that task or portion of the task shall be stopped until a revised scope, schedule and/or fee is documented in writing with a Project Change Request prepared by the Consultant (see Task 14) and agreed to and signed by the Consultant and City. The Consultant and Participating Jurisdictions agree to negotiate any such Project Change Request in good faith. WORK PROGRAM: The Consultant shall accomplish the following tasks, providing the needed services and deliverables. Deliverables and meeting invitations, as noted in each Task, shall be provided to the City, ReviewingJurisdictions and Advisory Group. Unless agreed to otherwise,the initial submittal of a deliverable will be a draft for review and comment. Task 1: Data Collection and Review A key element of this floodplain delineation study is to develop flood hydrology that is representative of the site conditions of the two basins. Important and unique features include high infiltration, interaction between groundwater and surface water, and complex drainage system that consists of inlets, drywells, pipes, open channels, bridges/culverts, and detention, retention and evaporation ponds. Many commercial developments, public transportation projects, and plat build-outs have occurred in the basins, and special study reports have also been developed. These projects and associated supporting documents provide valuable information of the basin characteristics, which is the foundation of developing a representative hydrologic model. The Consultant shall collect and review data and information from the City, Spokane, the County and other agencies for hydrologic and hydraulic modeling. The City shall assist in data collection. The City shall also use reasonable efforts to work with Spokane and the County to procure their assistance in data collection. Glenrose and Central Park LOMR/PMR Scope of Work 4 Data will be collected to evaluate basin characteristics which will include but not be limited to the following: • Drainage basin boundaries, • Precipitation, • Vegetation (e.g. canopy, rainfall interception), • Soils (e.g. composition, infiltration), • Geology (e.g. shallow bedrock, deep sands and gravels), • Shallow groundwater, the ground water/surface water interaction and its possible contribution to baseflows during the base flood, • Pervious and impervious surfaces, • Areas of significant depression storage, • Land use (e.g. commercial and residential development), • Zoning, • Stormdrain system and facility size, depth, location, infiltration rate and capacity, including— o Pipes, catch basins, manholes, outlet locations o Ponds: detention, retention, evaporation o Regional facilities o Large swales o Drywells o Culverts o Channels, natural drainageways • Sewer systems receiving stormwater, • Wetlands, • Streets and bridges. Data and information sources include, but are not limited to: • LiDAR, • Climate and flow datasets, • Aerial photography, • NRCS soil surveys, • GIS layers, • WA Dept. of Ecology data on registered UiCs (e.g. drywells), • Existing special studies (USGS, Glenrose/Central Park Stormwater Management Plan, geotechnical, groundwater, hydrologic and hydraulic), • Design and as-built plans for commercial and plat build-out plans, street improvement plans, regional stormwater facilities, • Drainage reports for stormdrain system and facility designs, • Infiltration tests for soils and drainage structures, • Complaints and documented issues (flooding, high groundwater, standing water in drywells, etc.). Glenrose and Central Park LOMR/PMR Scope of Work 5 The Consultant shall collect and review data and information prior to kick-off meeting and first site visit. Consultant shall document all stormdrain systems and facilities that are judged to be large enough to impact the flood flows to be modeled and to document all drywells. Assumptions: • The City shall help facilitate with obtaining documents and GIS datasets. The City shall also use reasonable efforts to work with Spokane and the County to have them facilitate obtaining documents and GIS datasets. GIS layers shall, at least, show locations of drainage facilities and systems and drywells, etc. Consultant shall keep a log of all documents obtained and/or reviewed. • Consultant shall document the locations of up to 30 stormdrain systems, 10 culvert groups, five bridges, 20 large ponds and regional stormwater facilities and 1200 drywells for later possible field evaluation and/or inclusion in model. • Consultant shall review up to: o 15 special study reports with up to 1,500 pages, o 30 designs of commercial developments, public street projects and plat build-outs with up to 2,000 pages of supporting documents that may include geotechnical, drainage reports, etc. Deliverables: • One data review memo including a list and summary of data collected and/or reviewed and the relevance to this project. Task 2: Kick-off Meeting, Initial Site Visit and Reconnaissance In conjunction with a kickoff meeting with the City, Reviewing Jurisdictions, Advisory Group and other interested parties, the Consultant shall make an initial site visit to confirm basin characteristics from Task 1, obtain additional on-site information such as that mentioned in Tasks 3 and 4 below and determine other information needed. In order to maximize the utility of this site visit, at least one week prior to this meeting/visit the City and other interested parties shall provide to Consultant a map(s) and/or list of areas of concern, an estimate of channel reaches needing floodplain delineation and any other details that will help clarify needed evaluation in this project. The site reconnaissance assessment shall include, but is not limited to, the following items: • Determining/confirming flow paths, barriers and potential basin divides, • Estimating Manning roughness values, • Confirming vegetation cover, geology, pervious and impervious surfaces, areas of significant depression storage, and land use, • Confirming location and condition (size, depth, location and capacity) of stormdrain systems and facilities and bridges including those noted in Task 1, stormdrain systems and Glenrose and Central Park LOMR/PMR Scope of Work 6 facilities and bridges shall be surveyed if as-built plans are not available or do not provide adequate information, • Surveying the channels including cross-sections where LiDAR data may not well capture the field condition, • Performing full-scale infiltration tests on drywells and infiltration test on pond bottoms to determine rates, Assumptions: • The kick-off meeting, initial site visit and reconnaissance are anticipated to take five people up to five working days, • During site visit time an additional meeting with the City, Reviewing Jurisdictions and other interested parties may be called to discuss intermediate findings, • Number of stormdrain systems and facilities requiring in-field evaluation and possibly survey include: 15 stormdrain systems, five culvert groups, three bridges, 10 large ponds and regional stormwater facilities and 100 drywells, • Number of in-field tests (per Spokane Regional Stormwater Manual chapter 4)to confirm infiltration capacities include: o drywells evaluated with full-scale drywell test: Glenrose— 7, Central Park- 3, o pond bottoms evaluated for infiltration rates: Glenrose— 1, Central Park - 1, Infiltration tests shall be conducted by the Consultant's subconsultant, ALLWEST Testing Engineering Inc. in Spokane Valley. Deliverables: • Field visit documentation report including an assessment of items identified above and implications for model development. Documentation shall include field notes, photos, videos, survey data and list of additional information needed. Task 3: Topographic Data Development The Consultant shall acquire base maps and develop topography from LiDAR data and channel surveys, and prepare the data as part of the LOMR/PMR for submittal to FEMA. Deliverables: • A memo explaining the process of developing the topographic data. • Base maps, contours, and bare earth digital elevation models (DEMs). Task 4: Data Collection Summarization and Jurisdiction Coordination Upon successful completion of Tasks 1 through 3, a meeting either in person or remotely (e.g. web/video) will be set up by Consultant to discuss data collection findings and future Glenrose and Central Park LOMR/PMR Scope of Work 7 coordination. Future coordination shall include any known details to help define the scope of upcoming tasks such as specific concentration points for the hydrologic analysis, channel limits for the hydraulic analysis, areas with flooding issues for the flood mitigation recommendations, etc. Deliverables: • A memo summarizing Data Collection and Jurisdiction Coordination. Task 5: Hydrologic Analysis and Second Site Visit The primary goal of this task is to develop flood hydrographs and peak flows at key points within the Glenrose and Central Park basins. The Consultant and City shall work to develop a hydrologic model that most reasonably represents flooding of the study area using reasonable rainfall- runoff modeling parameters. The hydrographs and peak flows will be developed using the hydrologic model, Hydrologic Simulation Program Fortran (HSPF). The model will be used to develop the runoff from historical precipitation records and applicable baseflows due to groundwater surfacing. Climate data may include the precipitation data from the Spokane Airport,the PRISM data, and records at two rain gages operated by Spokane. Sub-basin boundaries and synthetic flows shall be developed at key locations throughout the study area. The locations shall be determined by the Consultant, City and other participating agencies to provide sufficient resolution and detail for developing the hydraulic model and floodplain mapping that will represent the current conditions, and will also enable the evaluation of impacts from future proposed developments to the floodplains. Once the initial layout of sub- basins is determined, the Consultant shall provide the layout to the City for review prior to beginning HSPF model construction. The HSPF model will incorporate drywells, ponds (detention, retention and evaporation) and other stormwater facilities that are located throughout the study area. The drywells and ponds will help account for infiltration within the floodplain which may also include gravel pits and channels. Where applicable, current final plats will assume to be fully built out. A statistically based Flood Frequency Analysis (FFA) will be conducted on the long-term simulation model results to develop distributions of the 10-, 2-, 1- and 0.2-%annual chance flood peak flows at appropriate locations. The choice of FFA methodology will depend on the results of the HSPF model. Typically, a Log-Pearson Type Ill analysis is conducted for FFA in a non- regulated basin; however, for Chester Creek, a graphical distribution approach was required due to the number of years with zero flow at some points in the watershed. Glenrose and Central Park LOMR/PMR Scope of Work 8 The hydrologic model will not be calibrated to a specific flood event as there is not any observed data available. The HSPF model that was previously developed for the adjacent Chester Creek watershed will be used as a guide in developing rainfall-runoff parameters. While there are not flow or snowpack data available for the study basins, the parameters that affect snow accumulation and melt in HSPF will be calibrated to the observed snow depth data collected at the Spokane Airport. The parameters that control runoff will be calibrated to anecdotal evidence. For example, the results from both Chester and Saltese Creeks studies as well as the flow record along Hangman Creek all indicate that the December 1996 and January 1997 storms produced an approximately 1% annual chance flood event in the region. The model results will also be checked with local knowledge of runoff in recent years. Lastly, the flood frequency results from the HSPF long-term simulation will be compared to regional data, including the results from the Chester and Saltese Creeks, USGS regional regression equations (for rural sub-basins), and flood frequency flows at gages in the region (for rural sub-basins). Based on this comparative analysis, parameters within HSPF will be adjusted as needed to ensure reasonable results. The Consultant shall submit the hydrologic analysis and report as a draft to the City, Reviewing Jurisdictions and Advisory Group for review and comment. The Consultant shall submit the final hydrologic analysis to FEMA that incorporates review comments and resulting revisions. Site Visit and Meeting Once the preliminary hydrologic model is developed, Consultant shall perform a site visit and meet with the City, Reviewing Jurisdictions, Advisory Group and other interested parties to discuss findings. The purpose of the site visit is to perform a field check of sub-basin delineations, model elements connectivity, and verify preliminary hydrologic results. Asumptions: Number of study items in each basin: • sub-basins/ concentration points: Glenrose—60, Central Park - 20, • stormdrain systems: Glen rose—25, Central Park- 5, • culvert groups: Glen rose— 7, Central Park—3, • bridges: Glenrose—4, Central Park- 1, • large ponds and regional stormwater facilities: Glenrose—17, Central Park- 3 • drywells: Glenrose — 1000, Central Park — 200 (note that most drywells probably will be aggregated for inclusion in model) Deliverables: • A draft and final memo that describes the choice of HSPF over HEC-HMS for the hydrologic analysis. • Initial layout of sub-basin delineations and concentration points. • GIS shapefiles of delineated flow paths and routing, stream networks, sub-basins and stormwater facilities; boundaries of areas with assessed infiltration. • HSPF model snow calibration. • A draft hydrologic analysis. Glenrose and Central Park LOMR/PMR Scope of Work 9 • A final hydrologic analysis submittal incorporating review comments and resulting revisions for incorporation into the LOMR/PMR submittal. Task 6: Hydraulic Analysis The primary goal of this task is to develop floodplain and floodway limits and flood elevations within the City. The Consultant shall perform hydraulic modeling with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers software using the latest official (FEMA-approved, non-beta)version available when the work commences. Once the initial layout of cross-sections and structures needing analysis is determined, the Consultant shall provide the layout to the City, Reviewing Jurisdictions and Advisory Group for review. Cross-section density shall be such as to enable a quick and confident determination of water surface elevations at permanent structures. The hydraulic model will not be calibrated to a specific flood event as there is not any observed data available. The Consultant and City shall work to develop a hydraulic model that most reasonably represents flooding of the study area based upon the experience and judgement of the Consultant and the City and upon historical observations of flooding by the City. The City and Consultant may work with other interested parties, including Spokane and the County in development of the model. For the City, the Consultant shall perform hydraulic modeling, including floodplain and floodway delineations, of the Glenrose, Central Park and Bettman (in Central Park) channels within the City from downstream City boundary to upstream City boundary. The Consultant shall evaluate the need to use a coupled 1D/2D model to best represent the flood conditions in areas with possible flow splits. If a coupled 1D/2D model will best represent the flood conditions then that shall be utilized. The stream miles are approximately distributed as follows: • Central Park Channel - 1.5 miles with 0 bridges and 1 culvert group(s), • Bettman Channel - 0.4 miles with 2 bridges and 1 culvert group(s), • Glenrose Channel - 0.6 miles with 0 bridges and 2 culvert group(s), • Overland flowpaths - 1.9 miles with 0 bridges and 1 culvert group(s). The Consultant shall submit the hydraulic analysis and report as a draft to the City, Reviewing Jurisdictions and Advisory Group for review and comments. The Consultant shall submit the final hydraulic analysis to FEMA that incorporates review comments and resulting revisions. Deliverables: Glenrose and Central Park LOMR/PMR Scope of Work 10 • Initial layout of cross-sections and structures. • GIS shapefiles of HEC-RAS components. • Draft Hydraulic Model — This will be a HEC-RAS simulation with all hydrologic and geometric data included in the model. The model will include the results of discussions with the City, Reviewing Jurisdictions and Advisory Group to determine if the HEC-RAS model is appropriately estimating observed flooding in the reaches. • Preliminary Hydraulic Model — This will be the HEC-RAS model, including the 10-, 2-, 1-, and 0.2-% annual chance flood events, and the encroachment analyses. • Hydraulic Model for LOMR/PMR — This will be the model that incorporates review comments and resulting revisions for incorporation into the LOMR/PMR submittal. Task 7: Floodplain Mapping The Consultant shall complete flood mapping of the study area shown in Figure 1 per input by the City. Based on the hydraulic model results, the floodway, 1%-annual-chance floodplain and 0.2%-annual-chance floodplain boundaries will be delineated and provided on topographic workmaps.The Consultant shall develop flood profiles and floodway data tables. The Consultant shall submit the floodplain mapping according to FEMA's Guidelines and Specifications for flood Hazard Mapping as a draft to the City, Reviewing Jurisdictions and Advisory Group for review. The Consultant shall submit the final floodplain mapping that incorporates review comments and resulting revisions for incorporation into the LOMR/PMR submittal. Deliverables: • Preliminary mapping items as described in FEMA's Guidelines and Specifications for flood Hazard Mapping for mapping of riverine flooding.. • The Consultant shall deliver the final floodplain mapping incorporating review comments and resulting revisions for incorporation into the LOMR/PMR submittal. Task 8: LOMR/PMR Submittal The Consultant shall prepare a LOMR/PMR submittal for FEMA review. The package will include all required materials including FEMA's certification forms, topographic data, hydrologic and hydraulic models and a study report, and mapping products (flood profiles, Floodway Data Tables, work maps, GIS data). The Consultant shall prepare public notifications and notices to affected landowners on behalf of the City. The Consultant and City shall select either a LOMR or a PMR request after discussions with FEMA during the course of the study. Glenrose and Central Park LOMR/PMR Scope of Work 11 Deliverables: • A draft LOMR/PMR submittal package. • A LOMR/PMR submittal package for FEMA review. Task 9: FEMA Reviews The Consultant shall develop responses to FEMA comments, make necessary revisions to the LOMR/PMR submittal package, and prepare responses or a resubmittal, as needed. Four rounds of FEMA reviews and Consultant responses are assumed. Deliverables: • A resubmittal of the LOMR/PMR package incorporating FEMA review comment responses and resulting revisions. Task 10: Public Outreach Public outreach activities shall be led by the Consultant's subconsultant, Studio Cascade, Inc. (Studio Cascade), and assisted by the Consultant. Studio Cascade is a Spokane-based community planning and design firm with experience in multiple facets of public and private sector planning. To get the public involved and seek input from the public throughout the study, three (3) public meetings/updates located in or near the project area are expected, including (1) an open-house meeting to discuss project scope, schedule, and expected outcomes; (2) proposed flood hydrology; (3) preliminary hydraulic results and flood maps. The subconsultant shall devote approximately 24 hours to each meeting, including time to prepare and run the public events. That includes the work of two staff members to build meeting materials based on technical information the Consultant provides, coordinate with the City and others on meeting logistics and to prepare the venue, as appropriate. It also includes having two staff members attending the meeting, running the agenda, taking meeting notes and participating in the event to the degree appropriate. This is based on the assumption that the meetings are essentially informational in nature, where material at various stages in the process are packaged and presented to the public to inform them of the project. These are not workshops, where attendees will participate in various exercises and group discussions to advise on the project or wrestle with challenging issues. Deliverables: • Presentation materials Glenrose and Central Park LOMR/PMR Scope of Work 12 • Meeting minutes Task 11: Meetings To ensure that the Consultant provides high quality deliverables within budget and on schedule, the Consultant shall be expected to attend the following meetings: In-Person Kickoff meeting. In conjunction with the site visit (Task 2), the Consultant will attend a kickoff meeting in the City. The Consultant shall prepare a draft meeting agenda and draft and final meeting minutes. Data Collection Summarization and Jurisdiction Coordination meeting. The meeting to be remote (web/video) in conjunction with Task 4. In-Person Project and Hydrologic Analysis Update meeting. In conjunction with the second site visit (Task 5), the Consultant will attend a meeting in the City to discuss the project to date, the hydrologic model and findings. The Consultant shall prepare a draft meeting agenda and draft and final meeting minutes. Public Outreach Meetings. The Consultant shall provide technical data to Studio Cascade and attend three public outreach meetings in conjunction with Task 10. Bi-weekly Web/Video meetings. The Consultant shall report bi-weekly progress and activities, discuss model results, identify potential issues, and discuss solutions. The Consultant shall prepare draft and final meeting minutes. Incremental Review Meetings.The Consultant shall attend the following in-person or web/video meetings: 1. hydrology with snow and runoff calibration (web/video); 2. hydrology with flood frequency flows (web/video); 3. hydraulics with 1D, and discussion on 2D areas (web/video) 4. a preliminary LOMR/PMR submittal (web/video). FEMA Coordination. The Consultant shall have a meeting/conference call with FEMA Region X at the beginning of the study to understand the submittal requirements, review process, and timelines. The Consultant shall update FEMA on progresses at a semiannual basis. Glenrose and Central Park LOMR/PMR Scope of Work 13 Task 12: HSPF Model Training The Consultant shall develop documentation of the HSPF modeling including detailed, clear instructions for future users on how to modify the model for anticipated land use and development changes. In addition to the modeling documentation, the Consultant shall develop training materials for a one-day (maximum) training class for city and county staff and others to learn to run and modify the HSPF model and shall lead the one day (maximum) training class at the City. The training materials and instruction shall be specific to the HSPF model developed for this study, not a general HSPF modeling course. Assumptions: • To make the training more effective, the maximum number of participants is 15. Deliverables: • The Consultant shall deliver the HSPF modeling documentation and training materials for the one-day (maximum) training class for jurisdiction staff and others. • The Consultant shall travel to the City and lead the one-day (maximum)training class. Task 13: Flood Mitigation Recommendations With input from the City, the Consultant shall formulate and recommend potential projects at a conceptual level to reduce flooding issues that occur within the project areas. The mitigation alternative analysis will require HSPF and HEC-RAS modeling. Deliverables: • A report that presents the alternatives and results Task 14: Project Management The Consultant is to be the project manager and to perform active day-to-day administration of the project. Consultant is responsible for project management which includes but is not limited to: • Planning work to be done to accomplish tasks, who will do it and monitoring the schedule and budget, • Organizing and conducting meetings, keeping parties on task, compiling meeting minutes where not provided by subconsultant, • Coordinating reviews and comments, Glenrose and Central Park LOMR/PMR Scope of Work 14 • Keeping track of documents received and generated, • Notifying the City of information needs, deadlines, upcoming milestones, etc. • Providing monthly invoices to and keeping track of tasks performed for and fees charged. Consultant shall provide sufficient details to support its invoices, including time sheets for services performed and expense summaries, unless otherwise agreed to by the Parties. • Developing progress reports for and weekly communication with the City to ensure that all tasks are performed on time and within budget. • Preparing and facilitating Project Change Requests (PCR)for any necessary changes in the scope of work, schedule or fees, PCRs may be initiated by any of the Parties and shall be prepared,facilitated and processed by the Consultant.The PCR must describe the change, the rationale for the change, and the effect the change will have on the project. If the change is approved by all Parties, the Parties shall sign the PCR, which shall constitute approval for the work and project revision. Glenrose and Central Park LOMR/PMR Scope of Work 15 Figure 1. Glenrose—Central Park Basins Legend ll � � . ' M �', ., ,- •L J ]key Municipal Boundaries f1 1, -i� °3- "" * _- ` ----i,:: ..... ., 4a r Watersheds a e-� .f F . ',. ©CENTRAL PARK r r �• � FHA em . _ .. __- .1.?le :._ � ...;<,{ :...4-,:11:: N .Y ..s i -- -;.,.0%., ti _ _, Park _. Basrn _ - _ P+ . _ -1r1 _ ,- Basin t r Glenrose and Central Park LOMR/PMR Scope of Work 16 WEST Exhibit B - Cost Estimate .........- WEST Consultants,Inc. CLIENT City of.Spokane Valley 12.939 Eel-Red Road.Suite 00' Xicikvae,WA.9.360S-2S5 PROJECT: GIenrose and Central Park Basin' s FloodoLiin Delineation 425.646.2S06'Cphatoe). 425446.0570(ru) P.D.No.: Proj.No.: Date: 6,8/2015 ._._......_....._„,......................_...„.........._............._....._......._................,........................._._.__.......,........,............................_.......,,..................„.....,......._....._.........,.,...............,.....,..._........................„........,..._._....... WEST Consaltantr....lec. _ Projcel: &ajar Senior Staff Staff Sr.GIS J's.CIS ,, Tel,Loh®r SutiComailwit PHASE Task Description Man:60r , Q:1-LIQC Engin acr 1 Entiacer 1 Engificer 7. Elvinter i Slicatiiiit Specis8s4 a°— .1*—*""--°r 211.°:1°°'s TOTALS 1 . . . CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY I .1 I I , Task,L Data Collection and Review 9 O. /e• 0 0 ] 124 4 28 157 $221.546 _ _ 821.1146 I I TaSk2- Kick-olIMetiiiia.Initial Sits Visit and Recormaismacc 41 0 2 0 I 0 44 0 S 95 827.986 53.889 59.200 541.075 I I Task 3. Taaasnishia.aSta Dsycloscacra 0 r -.0 2_ 0 . 0 0 6 20 28 82.955 $2.955 I Task 4. II=Collection and.Ttaisdaction Coordination 12 1 0 2 0 0 4 0 0 18 s3.341 . 83.341 Task 5. ilyclroltheta Analysis and Sel:nad Site Visit 27 8 44 0 0 180 90 8 357 545.233 8701 545,934 I . Task 6. HYdranLic AnalYias' 8 4 30 0 0 174 12 52 280 S2.328 532.323 - _ - Task 7, Flosdplais Mappine 1 0 10 0 CI 22 12 64 109 511.734 811.734 1 I _ ask 8. 1.01v11VPIA Submittal 4 0 10 0 0 32 .0 I -72 118 812,785 512.785 I I 25k 9. FEIVIA licvicws 8 - 0 _ 16 0 0 I 45 0 I 32 104 512.477 812.477 I - _ - ask 10. Public.Outreach 3 0 0 1) 0 12 . D 24 35 I $4,230 81.089 8,10,800 516.119 - Task 11. Marines 74 _ 0 0 0 0 46 0 0 120 I 820.901 820.901 1i2. HSPF Model ThliliC1- C I f 0 0 0 0 64 0 16 81 SS.,571_ _ 58.571 I aik13. FloOd MitieationRCcammiadatians 12 0 6 0 0 80 0 44 142 516.302 _ $16,302 I I Task 14. Proiect Mattar_eineat 72 1 0 0 I 0 0. 0 0 0 72 S15.567 567 - . . ' 15_ I I I - 1 . . . 1OTAL HOURS 272 1.2 1 144 0 0 830 1 124 368 1,750 1 8236.256 1 55,679 1 520.000 I 5561.935 1 HOURLY BELLING RATE $216.21 5208.05 8160.17 8144,14 5106.55 510555 8119.29. , 595.95 SUBTOTALS 558:510 . .497 _ 823,065- SD SO 888.439 514,792 I 835.309 Nom: !, Hourly billing rams and manber ofbours arefor arronaring purposes only inmicarivill bobairad on adval lijages and burs Ofstoff#signed 0,*ippii. TOTAL COMPENSATION: 5261,935 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: September 4, 2018 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ® admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Administrative report— Business license code changes. GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 35A.82.020; RCW 35.22.280; chapter 35.90 RCW; chapter 5.05 SVMC. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: The City business license code was last amended in 2004. BACKGROUND: Pursuant to RCW 35A.82.020, the City is authorized to license all businesses within the City. Historically, the City has done so through chapter 5.05 SVMC, which requires any business to obtain a license registration with the City. There are certain exemptions and penalties for failure to properly register. The City has partnered with the Washington State Department of Revenue Business Licensing System ("BLS") to administer the City's business licensing. Thus, business owners submit license applications through the BLS online portal for a state license and City registration. BLS then provides the information to the City for review and approval. The BLS ultimately issues the owners a business license with the City's license registration. The City charges $13 annually for a City license registration. The City fee is in addition to any state business license fees. The City has imposed business license registration requirements on businesses for two primary purposes. First, the license registration ensures that sales taxes from the business are appropriately distributed to the City of Spokane Valley. Secondly, the City reviews applications to ensure that the proposed business use is allowed within the applicable zoning. This also includes ensuring that any proposed home business applies for and receives a home business permit to ensure that it does not adversely impact the surrounding residential neighborhood. In 2017, the State Legislature adopted Engrossed House Bill 2005, which is now codified as chapter 35.90 RCW. Chapter 35.90 RCW requires all cities to adopt, by January 1, 2019, a model business license ordinance. The model business license ordinance was developed by a large group of stakeholders with input from cities around the State. The model business license ordinance specifies a uniform definition of "engaging in business" that identifies what business does and does not constitute "engaging in business" for purposes of requiring business license registration. Secondly, the City is required to adopt one of two "threshold" provisions for businesses located outside of the City that provide business within the City. Specifically, the threshold provision provides that businesses located outside of the City that have business activity within the City of less than a specified threshold are either (1) not required to seek business license registration, or (2) must seek license registration, but cannot be required to pay for such application. The initial threshold amount has been determined to be$2,000 annual gross income. Finally, Chapter 35.90 RCW requires cities to either(1) partner with BLS to operate and administer their business licensing, or (2) use an approved business licensing portal (currently FIIeLocal). Page 1of3 Chapter 35.90 RCW requires BLS partner cities to adopt the model ordinance by a date such that it will be effective by January 1, 2019. BLS requires 75 days' notice of any changes to a city's business licensing system, so effectively the City is required to adopt the model ordinance provisions by October 17, 2018. In addition to the model ordinance requirements, City staff have reviewed chapter 5.05 SVMC and determined several updates and changes were necessary to more effectively implement the City's business license registration system. Due to the number of changes, staff are proposing to repeal the existing chapter 5.05 SVMC and replace it with a completely new chapter 5.05 SVMC. All of the changes, including the model business license ordinance provisions, are identified below. Model Ordinance Provisions— "Engaging in Business." Pursuant to chapter 35.90 RCW, the City is required to adopt the definition of"engaging in business" set forth in the model business license ordinance. The City cannot modify the language or it will be prohibited from licensing any businesses within its City. The definition of "engaging in business" is a broad definition and includes businesses that may be located outside of the City, but that clearly conduct business within the City. Historically, that distinction was sometimes unclear in the prior City code. The model ordinance definition of "engaging in business" is set forth in proposed SVMC 5.05.010. Model Ordinance Provisions— Threshold Pursuant to chapter 35.90, the City is required to adopt one of two specified threshold provisions. The threshold provisions only apply to businesses based outside of the City. Under the threshold provisions developed, the minimum gross annual threshold is $2,000. Thus, any business based outside of the City that conducts business within the City boundaries, but has business activity under $2,000, would qualify for the selected provision. For such businesses, the City may choose to either (1) not require a license, or (2) require a license at no cost. Staff recommends that Council choose option two and require a license at no cost. As a business grows over time, we ensure that we will capture appropriate sales taxes. Further, seeking a Spokane Valley license is relatively easy as it may be done online through the BLS portal. The threshold provision is set forth in proposed SVMC 5.05.020(D). Application Procedure Historically, chapter 5.05 SVMC identified the City Clerk as the official responsible for business licensing. This has been removed. Further, the application process has been clarified to require a complete application, including payment of fees, prior to processing. Further, the City's authority to review and approve or deny a business license has been clarified. The criteria include zoning, home business, or other applicable land use regulations. Finally, the effect of approval has been specified so as to clarify that approval of a business license does not preclude the City from enforcing any of its applicable land use, zoning, or development regulations. Violations and Penalties The City currently provides for a class 2 civil infraction for violations of chapter 5.05 SVMC. However, it has never been enforced as such. In lieu of a single penalty provision, the proposed chapter 5.05 SVMC identifies a procedure for the City to seek suspension or revocation of a business license and successive increasing penalties that begin as class 1 civil infractions and Page 2 of 3 escalate to class 3 civil infractions for ongoing violations. Since the process for applying for a business license registration is very easy and accessible and since the City's fee is so small at $13, the threat of the penalties allows the City a tool to ensure quick and timely response from businesses that fail to register. Currently, a class 3 civil infraction is $50, a class 2 civil infraction is $125, and a class 1 civil infraction is $250. Appeal Chapter 5.05 SVMC does not currently identify an appeal procedure. The proposed changes identify an appeal procedure for determinations for denial, suspension, and revocation of licenses. Penalties imposed for failure to obtain a license would proceed through a court of limited jurisdiction like other civil infractions. City staff are seeking input from City Council on the proposed new chapter 5.05 SVMC, including consensus on which threshold option Council would prefer. OPTIONS: Consensus to proceed with first reading at a future Council meeting; or take other action deemed appropriate. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Consensus to proceed with first reading at a future Council meeting. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: The City currently charges $13 for a City business license registration. The City received $124,006 in 2017 from business licenses. The City cannot determine if there will be significant changes from the proposed changes at this time. STAFF CONTACT: Erik Lamb, Deputy City Attorney ATTACHMENTS: Proposed new chapter 5.05 SVMC. Page 3 of 3 Chapter 5.05 BUSINESS LICENSE REGISTRATION Sections: 5.05.010 Engaging in Business. 5.05.020 Business license registration required. 5.05.030 Exemptions. 5.05.040 Application procedure. 5.05.050 Fee. 5.05.060 Transfer or sale of business—New registration required. 5.05.070 Violation;Penalty. 5.05.080 Appeal. 5.05.010 Engaging in business. A. The term"engaging in business"means commencing,conducting,or continuing in business,and also the exercise of corporate or franchise powers,as well as liquidating a business when the liquidators thereof hold themselves out to the public as conducting such business. B. This section sets forth examples of activities that constitute engaging in business in the City,and establishes safe harbors for certain of those activities so that a person who meets the criteria may engage in de minimus business activities in the City without having to pay a business license registration fee.The activities listed in this section are illustrative only and are not intended to narrow the definition of "engaging in business"in SVMC 5.05.010(A). If an activity is not listed,whether it constitutes engaging in business in the City shall be determined by considering all the facts and circumstances and applicable law. C. Without being all inclusive,any one of the following activities conducted within the City by a person, or its employee,agent,representative,independent contractor,broker or another acting on its behalf constitutes engaging in business and requires a person to register and obtain a business license registration. 1. Owning,renting,leasing,maintaining,or having the right to use,or using,tangible personal property,intangible personal property,or real property permanently or temporarily located in the City. 2. Owning,renting,leasing,using,or maintaining,an office,place of business,or other establishment in the City. 3. Soliciting sales. 4. Making repairs or providing maintenance or service to real or tangible personal property, including warranty work and property maintenance. 5. Providing technical assistance or service,including quality control,product inspections, warranty work,or similar services on or in connection with tangible personal property sold by the person or on its behalf. 6. Installing,constructing,or supervising installation or construction of,real or tangible personal property. 7. Soliciting,negotiating,or approving franchise,license,or other similar agreements. 8. Collecting current or delinquent accounts. 9. Picking up and transporting tangible personal property,solid waste,construction debris,or excavated materials. 10. Providing disinfecting and pest control services,employment and labor pool services,home nursing care,janitorial services,appraising,landscape architectural services,security system services, surveying,and real estate services including the listing of homes and managing real property. 11.Rendering professional services such as those provided by accountants,architects,attorneys, auctioneers,consultants,engineers,professional athletes,barbers,baseball clubs and other sports organizations,chemists,consultants,psychologists,court reporters,dentists,doctors,detectives, laboratory operators,teachers,veterinarians. 12.Meeting with customers or potential customers,even when no sales or orders are solicited at the meetings. 13.Training or recruiting agents,representatives,independent contractors,brokers or others, domiciled or operating on a job in the City,acting on its behalf,or for customers or potential customers. 14. Investigating,resolving,or otherwise assisting in resolving customer complaints. 15. In-store stocking or manipulating products or goods,sold to and owned by a customer, regardless of where sale and delivery of the goods took place. 16. Delivering goods in vehicles owned,rented,leased,used,or maintained by the person or another acting on its behalf. D. If a person,or its employee,agent,representative,independent contractor,broker or another acting on the person's behalf,engages in no other activities in or with the City except the following,it need not register and obtain a business license registration. 1. Meeting with suppliers of goods and services as a customer. 2. Meeting with government representatives in their official capacity,other than those performing contracting or purchasing functions. 3. Attending meetings,such as board meetings,retreats,seminars,and conferences,or other meetings wherein the person does not provide training in connection with tangible personal property sold by the person or on its behalf.This provision does not apply to any board of director member or attendee engaging in business such as a member of a board of directors who attends a board meeting. 4. Renting tangible or intangible property as a customer when the property is not used in the City. 5. Attending,but not participating in a"trade show"or"multiple vendor events". Such activities may be subject to other City regulations. 6. Conducting advertising through the mail. 7. Soliciting sales by phone from a location outside the City. E. A seller located outside the City merely delivering goods into the City by means of common carrier is not required to register and obtain a business license registration,provided that it engages in no other business activities in the City.Such activities do not include those in SVMC 5.05.010(D). The City expressly intends that engaging in business include any activity sufficient to establish nexus for purposes of applying the license registration fee under the law and the constitutions of the United States and the State of Washington.Nexus is presumed to continue as long as the taxpayer benefits from the activity that constituted the original nexus generating contact or subsequent contacts. 5.05.020 Business license registration required. A. Every person engaging in business shall register such person's business with the City. License registration shall include completion of a registration request,payment of any applicable license registration fees,and receipt of endorsement or approval of the license registration application by the City. If more than one business is located on a single premises,including residential home-based businesses,separate license registrations shall be required for each separate business conducted. Businesses with more than one City location shall register each location separately. B. Valid License Registration. No person may engage in business in the City or with the City without first having obtained and being the holder of a valid annual Washington State business license registration,and a valid annual City license registration. C..The City Manager is hereby authorized to enter into an agreement with the State of Washington Master License Service,its successor,or any other entity as allowed by law under which that agency shall accept and process City business license registration applications. ID.TWO OPTIONS ALLOWED BY MODEL ORDINANCE: / Commented[EL1]:Model Code allows two options for businesses with income under the threshold of$2,000. The First Option—No registration: To the extent set forth in this section,the following persons and first is to have no registration required,while the second businesses shall be exempt from the registration,license and/or license fee requirements as outlined in requires registration,but it is free. this chapter: (1) Any person or business whose annual value of products,gross proceeds of sales,or gross income of the business in the City is equal to or less than$2,000(or higher threshold as determined by City)and who does not maintain a place of business within the City shall be exempt from the general business registration requirements in this chapter.The exemption does not apply to regulatory license requirements or activities that require a specialized permit. Second Option—Free license registration: 1'or purposes of the license registration by this chapter,any / Commented[EL2]:Recommend second option,as this person or business whose annual value of products,gross proceeds of sales,or gross income of the ensures capturing revenue in the event the business grows business in the City is equal to or less than$2,000 land who does not maintain a place of business within over time. the City,shall submit a business license registration to the City.The threshold does not apply to Commented[EL3]:Threshold may be set higher,but regulatory license requirements or activities that require a specialized permit. cannot go below$2,000. 5.05.030 Exemptions. The following services and activities shall be exempt from the provisions of chapter 5.05 SVMC: A. Delivering newspapers and periodicals. B. Soliciting orders from retail establishments via telephone,Internet or mail for the delivery and sale of goods,wares,and merchandise unless the person's place of business is located within the City. C. Minors engaged in babysitting. D. The casual sale of items of personal property where the person conducting such sale is not regularly engaged in the business of selling items of personal property(for example,garage sales,service agency bake sales). E. Sales by fanners or gardeners of their own faun products raised and grown exclusively upon lands owned or occupied by them. F. Providers of Internet or wireless phone services where the provider operates from premises located outside the City and the only event occurring within the City is receipt of such goods and services. G. Temporary craft booths and food booths lasting 10 days or less in any one location. / Commented MEL4l:These exemptions currently exist in the City's code. 5.05.040 Application procedure. A.Application for the business license registration or renewal shall be made in writing to the City upon a form provided by the City,which may be electronic,and which may be through any agency the City has contracted with for processing of license registration applications. Business license registrations shall include a physical address for the business which shall not be a post office box or a mail delivery designation for addresses associated with a commercial mail receiving agency. Complete applications shall include all necessary information as set forth on the form,any additional information requested by the City such as additional information about the nature of the business operations,and complete payment of any applicable fees. B.If the applicant is a partnership,the application shall be made by one of the partners;if a corporation, by one of the officers thereof;if a foreign corporation,partnership or nonresident individual,by the resident agent or local manager of the corporation,partnership or individual. C. Home businesses. A business license registration application for a home business shall not be approved until a home business permit is applied for and received from the City by the applicant. D. Review. The City shall review each application for completeness and may return any application that is incomplete. The City may deny and reject any applications that are inconsistent with applicable land use regulations,including zoning,home business,or other applicable land use regulations. The City shall provide applicants with a statement as to the reasons for any denial and rejection of an application. In the event any application is rejected,the City may,but is not required to refund any fees collected. E. Effect of business license registration. Receipt of a business license registration shall not be deemed or construed as approval of or right to any particular land use,approval of a particular structure,facility, or improvement,or approval under any other Code provision. Persons with business license registrations shall comply with all applicable Code provisions,including but not limited to land use,zoning, environmental,and building regulations. The City may enforce such provisions regardless of any business license registration that may have been received by an owner or operator. 5.05.050 Fee. A.City business license registration shall occur on an annual basis and shall automatically expire one year from the date of registration or renewal for which the City registration or previous renewal was issued. B.An annual fee shall be charged for registering a business or businesses and renewing any license registration.Business license registration fees shall be established by City Council through adoption of a resolution. The City may impose an additional delinquency fee for any late renewal that is not paid by the applicable annual renewal due date. 5.05.060 Transfer or sale of business—New registration required. Upon the sale or transfer of any business,the license registration issued to the prior owner or transferer shall automatically expire on the date of such sale or transfer and the new owner intending to continue such business in the City shall apply for a new license registration pursuant to the procedures established by chapter 5.05 SVMC. 5.05.070 Violation;Penalty. A. Violation. Failure to comply with any provision herein shall be a violation of chapter 5.05 SVMC. The City may seek any remedy available by law,including but not limited to suspension or revocation of a business license registration and imposition of penalties pursuant to SVMC 5.05.070(C). B. Suspension or revocation. In the event the City determines to suspend or revoke a City business license registration,it shall issue a determination in writing to the business owner listed on the license registration stating the basis for such determination,the business owner's rights to appeal,and the effect of the determination. A business owner shall cease all business operations upon suspension or revocation of a business license registration. A determination to suspend or revoke a license registration shall not in any way limit the City's right to any other remedy,including but not limited assessment of applicable penalties. C.Penalty. Any person,firm,or corporation who knowingly violates or fails to comply with any term or provision of chapter 5.05 SVMC shall be deemed to have committed a civil infraction.A person,firm,or corporation found to have committed a civil infraction shall be assessed a daily monetary penalty pursuant to RCW 7.80.120,as adopted or subsequently amended,including any applicable statutory assessment. The penalties shall be assessed as follows: 1. First offense:Class 3 civil infraction. 2. Second offense arising out of the same facts as the first offense:Class 2 civil infraction. 3. Third offense and any other subsequent offenses arising out of the same facts as the first offense:Class 1 civil infraction. / Commented[EL5]:Currently,our code provides that violation shall be subject to a class 2 civil infraction. 5.05.080 Appeal. A. A person may appeal any(1)determination of a violation of chapter 5.05 SVMC other than violations associated with the imposition of penalties,which shall be appealed pursuant to SVMC 5.05.080(B),(2) denial,suspension,or revocation of a City business license registration,or(3)determination that a person is engaged in business and the person disputes that determination,to the City Manager within 14 days of such determination. In order for an appeal to be considered,the business owner or applicant shall provide a written statement that describes with particularity the reasons why the City's decision was in error and the reasons the City Manager should reverse the denial,suspension,or revocation. An appeal shall be accompanied by payment of any applicable appeal fees to be considered timely. The City Manager shall review the appeal and issue a written decision to uphold,modify,or reverse the determination within 30 days of receipt of the appeal.The City Manager's decision is the final decision of the City and may be appealed to the Spokane County Superior Court within 21 days of the date of the City Manager's decision. B. Appeals of the imposition of penalties shall be made pursuant to chapter 7.80 RCW. DRAFT ADVANCE AGENDA as of August 30,2018; 8:30 a.m. Please note this is a work in progress;items are tentative To: Council& Staff From: City Clerk,by direction of City Manager Re: Draft Schedule for Upcoming Council Meetings Friday,September 7,2018-Special Meeting w/Spokane Regional Council of Governments 10:00 a.m. —12:30 pm;Spokane county Fair&Expo Center,Expo Complex, 404 N Havana Street Sept 11,2018,Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Tue Sent 41 Proclamation: Valleyfest 1. PUBLIC HEARING#1: 2019 Revenues including Property Taxes—Chelsie Taylor (15 minutes) 2. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes;motion to set Oct 9 budget hearing, Centennial Trail Amended Contract) (5 minutes) 3.First Reading Ordinance 18-020 Amending Business License —Erik Lamb (15 minutes) 4.First Reading Ordinance 18-021 Amending SVMC 2.10.020, Salary Commission—Cary Driskell(15 min) 5.Motion Consideration: WSDOT Interlocal,Barker I-90 Westbound Interchange—Gloria Mantz (10 minutes) 6.Motion Consideration: Barker/I-90 Westbound Interchange Contract—Gloria Mantz (10 minutes) 7.Motion Consideration: Glenrose Floodplain Re-Study—Henry Allen (15 minutes) 8. Admin Report: Spokane Valley Express System—Elisha Heath (10 minutes) 9. Advance Agenda—Mayor Higgins (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting: 100 mins] Sept 18,2018, Study Session,6:00 p.m. [due Tue Sept 111 1. Outside Agencies Presentations(Economic Dev& Social Services combined)—Chelsie Taylor(—60 minutes) 2. Street& Stormwater Main. Programs—John Hohman,Harry Lorick, Consultant (30 minutes) 3. Integration of Combined Communication Center—Chief Werner,Chief Collins (20 minutes) 4. Proposed Ordinance Adopting 2019 Property Taxes—Chelsie Taylor (10 minutes) 5.Advance Agenda -Mayor Higgins (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting: 125 mins] Sept 25,2018,Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Tue Sept 181 1. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 2. Second Reading Ordinance 18-020 Amending Business License—Erik Lamb (10 minutes) 3. Second Reading Ordinance 18-021 Amending SVMC 2.10.020, Commission-Cary Driskell (15 min) 4.First Reading Ordinance 18- Amending Park Regulations—Cary Driskell,Mike Stone (15 minutes) 5.Mayoral Appointment: Human Rights Task Force—Mayor Higgins (10 minutes) 6.Admin Report: City Manager Presentation of 2019 Preliminary Budget—Mark Calhoun (45 minutes) 7.Admin Report: Advance Agenda—Mayor Higgins (5 minutes) 8. Info Item: Department Reports [*estimated meeting: 105 mins] Oct 2,2018, Study Session,6:00 p.m. [due Tue Sept 25 1. Duplex Density Discussion—Lori Barlow (15 minutes) 2.Budget Amendment,2018—Chelsie Taylor (10 minutes) 3. Legislative Agenda,2019—Mark Calhoun (15 minutes) 4.Advance Agenda—Mayor Higgins (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting: mins] Draft Advance Agenda 8/30/2018 9:30:50 AM Page 1 of 3 Oct 9,2018,Formal meeting Format,6:00 p.m. Idue Tue Oct 21 1. PUBLIC HEARING#2: 2019 Budget— Chelsie Taylor (20 minutes) 2. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 3. Second Reading Ordinance 18- Amending Park Regulations—Cary Driskell,Mike Stone (15 minutes) 4.First Reading Ordinance 18- ,Property Tax— Chelsie Taylor (10 minutes) 5.Advance Agenda—Mayor Higgins (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting: 55 mins] Oct 16,2018, Study Session,6:00 p.m. [due Tue Oct 91 1.Advance Agenda—Mayor Higgins (5 minutes) Oct 23,2018,Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Tue Oct 161 1. PUBLIC HEARING: 2018 Budget Amendment—Chelsie Taylor (10 minutes) 2. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 3. Second Reading Ordinance 18- ,Property Tax—Chelsie Taylor (10 minutes) 4.First Reading Ordinance 18- ,adopting 2018 Budget Amendment—Chelsie Taylor (10 minutes) 5.First Reading Ordinance 18- ,adopting 2019 Budget— Chelsie Taylor (10 minutes) 6.Motion Consideration: Outside Agency Allocation of Funds—Chelsie Taylor (20 minutes) 7.Motion Consideration: Approval of 2019 Legislative Agenda—Mark Calhoun (10 minutes) 8.Admin Report: Quarterly Police Department Report—Chief Werner (10 minutes) 9.Advance Agenda—Mayor Higgins (5 minutes) 10. Info Item: Department Reports [*estimated meeting: 90 mins] Oct 30,2018, Study Session,6:00 p.m. [due Tue Oct 231 1.Advance Agenda—Mayor Higgins (5 minutes) Nov 6,2018, Study Session,6:00 p.m. [due Tue Oct 301 1.Fee Resolution for 2019—Chelsie Taylor (15 minutes) 2.Advance Agenda—Mayor Higgins (5 minutes) Nov 13,2018,Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Tue Nov 61 1. PUBLIC HEARING#3: 2019 Budget— Chelsie Taylor (15 minutes) 2. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 3. Second Reading Ordinance 18- ,adopting 2018 Budget Amendment—Chelsie Taylor (10 minutes) 4. Second Reading Ordinance 18- ,adopting 2019 Budget—Chelsie Taylor (10 minutes) 5.Admin Report: LTAC Recommendations to Council—Chelsie Taylor (15 minutes) [*estimated meeting: 55 mins] Nov 20,2018,Study Session,6:00 p.m. fdue Tue Nov 131 1.Advance Agenda—Mayor Higgins (5 minutes) 2. Info Item: Department Reports Nov 27,2018—Meeting Cancelled— Thanksgiving Holiday Dec 4,2018,Study Session,6:00 p.m. [due Tue Nov 261 1.Advance Agenda—Mayor Higgins (5 minutes) Dec 11,2018,Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Tue Dec 41 1. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 2. Proposed Fee Resolution for 2019— Chelsie Taylor (10 minutes) 3.Motion Consideration: Award of Lodging Tax for 2019— Chelsie Taylor (15 minutes) Draft Advance Agenda 8/30/2018 9:30:50 AM Page 2 of 3 Dec 18,2018, Study Session,6:00 p.m. 1due Tue Dec 111 1.Advance Agenda—Mayor Higgins (5 minutes) 2. Info Item: Department Reports No Meeting: Tuesday,December 25,2018, and no meeting Tuesday, January 1,2019 *time for public or Council comments not included OTHER PENDING AND/OR UPCOMING ISSUES/MEETINGS: Aging&long Term Care Board Appointments Animal Control Regulations(SVMC 7.30) Argonne Rd Broadway to Indiana Bid Award Browns Park Update Camping in RVs Centennial Trail Contract Amendment Compassionate SV Donation Recognition Electrical Inspections Governance Manual Health District Re SV Stats Human Rights Task Force Land Use Notice Requirements Legislative Delegation Meeting Legislative Remote Testimony(Chambers) Naming City Facilities Protocol Neighborhood Restoration Program Police Dept.Quarterly Rpt(April,July,Oct,Jan) Police Precinct Lease Renewal(Nov '18) Sign Ordinance Snowplows,sidewalk snow removal,etc. St.Illumination(ownership,cost,location) St. O&M Pavement Preservation Sullivan Bridge Project Completion Update Tobacco 21 Resolution Town Hall Conversations TPA Utility Facilities in ROW Washington,D.C.trip(transportation issues) Draft Advance Agenda 8/30/2018 9:30:50 AM Page 3 of 3 Mark Werner Ozzie Knezovich Chief of Police Sheriff OL�C Spokane Valley Police Department Accredited Since 2011 Services provided in partnership withAr Aft,Nt.001, \ the Spokane County Sherds Office and the Community, Dedicated to Your Safety. TO: Mark Calhoun, City Manager FROM: Mark Werner, Chief of Police DATE: August 24, 2018 RE: Monthly Report July 2018 In August 2016, we switched from UCR to NIBRS classification, which means we went from reporting based on a hierarchy to reporting all the crimes for each incident. Consequently, comparing crime statistics before August 2016 to crime statistics after that timeframe is not recommended using the data provided in the attached charts and graphs. ADMINISTRATIVE: Chief Werner attended a SpoCom Board Meeting in early July as well as SpoCom Executive Director Assessment/Interviews in mid-July. Quarterly In-Service was held in mid-July, which Chief Werner attended. The Spokane Regional Safe Streets Task Force Board Meeting was held in late July, which Chief Werner and other command staff from the Sheriff's Office attended. Chief Werner and other local law enforcement command staff attended the Joint Terrorism Task Force's quarterly meeting in late July. Page 1 SHERIFF'S COMMUNITY ORIENTED POLICING EFFORT (SCOPE): In the month of July, S.C.O.P.E. participated in: • S.C.O.P.E. Basic Training • East Valley Community Coalition Meeting • Adams Elementary School Summer Camp Underage Drinking/Drug Prevention • ValleyFest Cycle Celebration Bike Ride • GSSAC Coalition Meeting, and • ValleyFest Planning Meetings • Operation Family ID • Moving Forward S.C.O.P.E. Regional Meetings July 2018 Volunteers Hours per Station *Includes estimated volunteer service hours that are provided in the City of Spokane Valley. These two locations cover both Spokane Valley and the unincorporated portion of the county. Location # Volunteers Admin Hours L.E.Hours Total Hours Central Valley 7 92.5 64 156.5 East Valley* 26 260.5 363 623.5 Edgecliff 9 209 14 223 Trentwood 5 142.5 84 226.5 University 27 382 135 517 West Valley* 19 297.5 63.5 361 TOTALS 93 1,384 723.5 2,107.5 Volunteer Value ($30.46 per hour) $64,194.45 for July 2018 SCOPE members assist the Spokane Valley Police Department each month by placing speed radar boards throughout Spokane Valley in conjunction with the Traffic Unit, in an effort to reduce speed in locations that have been identified by law enforcement or brought to their attention by the community as having excessive speeding vehicles. For the month of July, the speed radar board was placed at 17 locations, capturing 480 hours of coverage. S.C.O.P.E. Incident Response Team (SIRT) volunteers contributed 165 on-scene hours (including travel time)in July,responding to crime scenes,motor vehicle accidents and providing traffic control; 57 hours were for incidents specifically in Spokane Valley. There were 8 special events in July; 1 was in Spokane Valley: ValleyFest Cycle Celebration. Total July volunteer hours contributed by SIRT, including training, stand-by, response and special events is 1,425; total for 2018 is 8,083. (Starting January 2018, a change was made in how actual hours of `stand-by' time is calculated. Due to the shortage of staff necessary to cover up to 62 shifts of 24 hours per day per month, a simple formula as used in the past, no longer reflects the actual time spent on stand-by. We now count each month the actual time members sign up for duty minus the time actually spent on-scene.) Page 2 Abandoned Vehicles April May June Tagged for Impounding 24 37 40 Cited/Towed 8 3 5 Hulks Processed 12 24 13 Total Vehicles Processed 88 143 131 Yearly Total of Vehicles Processed 418 561 692 SCOPE DISABLED PARKING ACTIVITY REPORT City of Spokane Valley # of # of Hrs. # of # of # of Non - Vol. Disabled Warnings Disabled Infractions Issued Infractions Issued Issued January 0 0 0 0 0 February 0 0 0 0 0 March 1 3.5 1 3 0 April 1 3 0 2 0 May 1 3.5 1 0 0 June 0 0 0 0 0 July 0 0 0 0 0 YTD Total 3 10 2 5 0 Spokane County # of # of Hrs. # of # of # of Non - Vol. Disabled Warnings Disabled Infractions Issued Infractions Issued Issued January 1 11.5 1 11 0 February 3 24 7 13 0 March 3 34.5 11 16 0 April 2 21.5 2 5 0 May 3 28.5 4 20 0 June 10 2 8 0 0 July 4 28.5 6 13 0 YTD Total 26 150.5 39 78 0 Page 3 OPERATIONS: Spokane Valley Deputy Responding to a Reported Dead Body Administers Naloxone (Narcan) Probably Saving the Male's Life-A Spokane Valley Deputy responding to a report of a neighbor finding a dead body discovered the unconscious male had a very faint pulse and was taking very shallow breaths. Deputy Woolard administered Naloxone to reverse the effects of a possible overdose and save the man's life. In early July, at approximately 7:30 a.m., Spokane Valley Deputies responded to a suspicious circumstance call where the caller stated her neighbor just came over and said he found a dead body in his basement. Deputy Natalie Woolard was the first to arrive at the residence located in the 11100 block of E. 10th Ave.in Spokane Valley. The caller stated several people were living inside her neighbor's residence, but she was unsure of their names. Suddenly, the front door of the residence opened by a male screaming for help. The male ran back inside and continued to yell. He reappeared dragging a lifeless, unconscious male to the door. Not knowing what had occurred,Deputy Woolard quickly detained the male and moved to check on the unconscious male. Deputy Woolard located a very faint pulse and heard him taking very shallow breaths. From her observations at the scene, Deputy Woolard believed the male was experiencing a possible opioid overdose. Deputy Woolard advised dispatch and requested a medic response as she ran to her patrol car to retrieve her "Overdose Reversal Kit." Deputy Woolard administered one dose of Naloxone and began a strong sternum rub in an effort get the male to regain consciousness. After approximately a minute, Deputy Woolard administered a second dose while continuing the sternum rub. Deputy Brian Lawler, who had arrived at the location to assist, stated the male's pulse was getting stronger and it was apparent his breaths were becoming more frequent. The deputies decided to move the male from the porch onto the walkway to allow medical staff more room for equipment and to provide treatment. As they began the move, the male became conscious, opened his eyes and asked what had happened. He admitted he used heroin and had recently taken some Xanax pills. Spokane Valley Fire and AMR personnel arrived and took over medical care of the male. The witnesses who were inside the residence were vague and provided very little information about the incident. The male was transported by ambulance to the hospital for further treatment. Fleeing Suspect Rams Deputy's Vehicle after Pursuit and is Shot — Spokane Valley Deputies received a call to check the welfare of a female who told a citizen she needed help. The female, who appeared to have been badly beaten and injured, left the store in a van with an adult male. A deputy attempted to stop the vehicle, but the driver refused to stop and began to flee. After turning down a dead-end road, the driver rammed the patrol car, disabling it. The deputy exited his vehicle, drew his weapon and began giving commands. When the driver accelerated toward the deputy,he fired his weapon striking the suspect. In late July,just prior to 2:00 a.m., Spokane Valley Deputies responded to a call of a female who reportedly appeared to be in danger. A caller stated the female appeared to have been badly beaten/injured and asked for help prior to leaving the store in a van driven by an adult male. Deputies began looking for the vehicle and preliminary information indicated a deputy located it a few minutes later near the area of Hartson and Thor. When the deputy attempted to initiate a traffic stop of the vehicle, the driver failed to pull over and continued south on Thor. The driver seemed to be stopping a few blocks later, but, instead, he turned west on Hills Ct. and began to flee. As the driver approached the end of Hills Ct., he turned the vehicle around and rammed into the deputy's marked patrol car, disabling it. The deputy exited his vehicle, drew his weapon, and began giving commands. The driver accelerated toward the deputy and the deputy fired his weapon, striking the driver. Life-saving medical attention was initiated at Page 4 the scene by law enforcement until they were relieved by medical personnel. Despite these efforts, the male was pronounced deceased at the scene. The adult female passenger was provided medical attention before she was transported to a hospital for additional treatment. The Officer Involved Protocol was enacted and SIRR Team investigators responded to the scene to conduct the investigation and process the scene for evidence. The SIRR Team is comprised of multiple agencies in eastern Washington, including the Spokane Police Department, Washington State Patrol, Spokane County Sheriff's Office and the Spokane Valley Police Department. The Spokane Police Department is the case managing agency in this incident. All future communications regarding this investigation will be sent via the SIRR Team. Wanted Suspect Rams Deputy's Vehicle During a Traffic Stop and Flees - Spokane Valley Deputy Joseph Wallace stopped a vehicle believing the driver was a 38-year-old male who had an active felony warrant for his arrest. After pulling over, the male suspect put his vehicle in reverse,rammed Deputy Wallace's patrol car and fled. The vehicle was located abandoned and a 1(9 search, assisted by Air 1, was unsuccessful in locating the male suspect. Alerts were sent out that the suspect was believed to be attempting to flee the area and should be considered armed and dangerous due to this incident and his violent history. In late July, at approximately 11:15 p.m., Spokane Valley Deputy Wallace observed and recognized a gray Dodge Charge traveling south on Vista Rd. Knowing the male suspect usually drives this vehicle, Deputy Wallace checked the suspect's name and learned he had an active Washington State Department of Corrections warrant for his arrest. Deputy Wallace activated his emergency lights to conduct a traffic stop and the male suspect pulled into a driveway of a residence in the 600 block on N. Vista and stopped. Knowing he had a history of violence, eluding,and known to be armed, Deputy Wallace requested the assistance of additional deputies. Deputy Wallace stayed back and ordered the male suspect to shut off the vehicle and place his hands out of the window. The suspect complied and stuck his head out as well,looking back at Deputy Wallace. When Deputy Wallace ordered the suspect to use one hand to unbuckle his seat belt,the male suspect suddenly pulled back inside both hands and began to dig around. Deputy Wallace asked for emergency backup as he ordered the male suspect to put his hand back out of the window. The suspect ignored the orders, started the vehicle and threw it into reverse, colliding with Deputy Wallace's patrol car. The force of the collision caused the patrol car to jolt backwards almost striking Deputy Wallace who was standing next to it behind the open driver's door. Knowing the suspect intentionally rammed his patrol car and fearing for his life,Deputy Wallace aimed his weapon toward the male suspect to defend himself, but did not fire due to safety concerns. After pushing past the patrol car,the male suspect fled north on Vista with Deputy Wallace in pursuit. Once Deputy Wallace caught up to the suspect,the suspect suddenly slammed on his brakes causing the two vehicles to collide before speeding away again. The pursuit continued north on Vista, east on Mission, and south on Bessie where Deputy Wallace lost sight of the male suspect near Valleyway. As additional deputies arrived in the area to assist, Deputy Nathan Booth and Deputy Skye Ortiz located the male suspect near Sprague and Locust. The suspect continued to flee and drive recklessly as he drove north on Locust with the deputies in pursuit. Now eastbound on Nora, the suspect's vehicle began to smoke badly and appeared to be losing oil. Near Nora and Woodruff, the deputies lost sight of the male suspect again. Soon after,the vehicle was located abandoned near Nora and Dartmouth. A perimeter was quickly established and a Spokane Police Department K9 Unit and Air 1 were requested to assist in the search. Despite everyone's efforts, the male suspect was not located. The Dodge was seized for evidence and Spokane Valley Investigative Unit (SVIU) Page 5 Detectives applied for and were granted a search warrant for the vehicle. A search of the vehicle recovered cocaine and over$1,500 in cash. The following day, at approximately 9:45 a.m., a citizen called to report finding a 9mm pistol on the side of the road near Boone and Vista. Deputy Paul Vaughn and Deputy Mike Wall responded to the scene and observed a Walther CCP 9mm pistol on the west shoulder of Vista. The pistol was loaded with one round in the chamber and six rounds in the magazine. A check of the serial showed the x handgun had not been reported stolen. While SPoxaH P �asF SHEERR IFF /145.4 -7 the deputies collected the pistol for evidence, SHERIF ' � r the original person who reported the initials o ' finding of the handgun returned and said she '. f . located a second pistol near Vista and Sinto. There, the deputies recovered a green 9mm Glock 43. The pistol was not loaded, but a check of the serial number revealed it had ti�,� been reported stolen last month in Spokane. Ly Both firearms were booked into evidence and �. f` submitted for testing to determine if they were discarded by the suspect during the �``�• �::,� + �� pursuit. The following day at 5:30 p.m., the Spokane Valley SWAT Team, members of the . SPOKANE COUNTY Spokane Valley Fire Rescue Task Force and SHERIFF SHERIFF OZZIE O.KNEZOVICH with Air 1 overhead assisted Spokane Valley Investigative Unit Detectives safely serve a f ` search warrant at a residence located in the 600 "Nt block of N. Vista Rd. in connection with this i; investigation. No one was located inside the residence but detectives recovered two additional firearms, methamphetamine, heroin, drug scales and a reported stolen air compressor. Through further investigation, ' Spokane Valley Investigative Unit (SVIU) Detective Jeff Thurman developed information the male suspect was possibly in a hotel room of the downtown Quality Inn. Detective Thurman accompanied by Deputy Jason Hunt, his partner K9 Gunnar and additional Deputies/SPD Officers arrived at the location. Multiple subjects were located inside the suspected hotel room including the male suspect, who refused to comply with commands. K9 Gunnar was deployed to help safely take the male suspect into custody. The suspect was provided medical attention prior to being transported and booked into the Spokane County Jail. During a search of the hotel room, detectives seized approximately one pound of Heroin, one-half pound of Methamphetamine,numerous Suboxone strips and approximately$13,000 in cash.None of the other individuals contacted at the scene were charged at the time of the male suspect's arrest; however, SVIU Detectives continue to work this investigation, conduct interviews and process evidence. The male suspect was booked into the Spokane County Jail on a Washington State Department of Corrections hold. He faces multiple felony charges from this active investigation. Page 6 Suspect Learns "COPS" Ringtone is a "Catchy" Tune - A suspect who attempted to elude a Spokane Valley Deputy in a vehicle, and on foot, was arrested at a sports bar while trying to blend in with the crowd. After his arrest, he denied running from the deputy even after his identity was confirmed by a witness and the deputy himself. The final proof occurred when the deputy called the cell phone number provided by the suspect and the "COPS" theme song ringtone started playing from the suspect's phone he left in the driver's seat. In mid-July,just before 11:30 p.m., Spokane Valley Deputy Andrew Richmond observed a Volkswagen spin its tires and rapidly accelerate from a traffic light on Sullivan and Broadway. The 28-year-old male driver continued to accelerate to over 70 mph despite Deputy Richmond's patrol vehicle behind him with its emergency lights and siren activated. In an obvious attempt to evade Deputy Richmond, the male suspect turned into a parking lot in the 200 block of N. Sullivan and rapidly accelerated. The suspect drove around the Sullivan Scoreboard to a gravel parking lot, rapidly accelerated again and turned off all the lights. As the suspect parked the vehicle and jumped out, Deputy Richmond pulled up and exited his patrol car. The male suspect looked directly at Deputy Richmond who ordered him to stop and get on the ground. The suspect ignored the commands, turned and ran into the business. Deputy Richmond chased the male suspect through the bar,but briefly lost sight of him when the male ran out onto a large patio area occupied by approximately 50 or more people. A few minutes later, a male approached Deputy Richmond and told him the male suspect was sitting at a table on the west end of the patio. Deputy Richmond immediately recognized the suspect even though the male had removed his shirt and hat in an attempt to change his appearance. The male suspect was arrested without further incident,placed in the back of a patrol car and advised of his rights. The male suspect denied running from Deputy Richmond and stated he had been at the bar for"hours." During the interview,the male suspect provided his name, address and other information including his cell phone number. A check of the male suspect's name revealed an active misdemeanor warrant(DUI) for his arrest and that the suspect's driver's license was suspended in the 3rd degree. During a search of the male suspect, a cell phone was not located. With the suspect still denying he tried to flee, Deputy Richmond decided to call the cell phone number the male suspect provided. He walked over to the vehicle the suspect was driving and Deputy Richmond could clearly hear the well-known theme song of the Cops TV show coming from the male suspect's cell phone, which was sitting on the driver's seat. The male suspect was transported and booked into the Spokane County Jail for Attempting to Elude a Police Vehicle, Obstructing and Driving While Suspended 3rd Degree in addition to his misdemeanor warrant. Email SCAM: Same Principle of Threats Used to Steal Your Money - The Spokane County Sheriff's Office and Spokane Valley Police Department continue to receive reports of scammers trying to lie, intimidate, trick, and threaten people into giving up their hard-earned money or personal information,leaving them vulnerable to identity theft. They"IRS Scam,""Grandparents Scam," "You have warrants" Scam and the "You've won a huge amount of money but you have to send us a small fee to get it" Scam are still active in our area,but a twist using email has recently been reported. In this email scam, a potential victim receives an email stating the sender has evidence of pornography crimes committed by the victim. This could be anything, such as your email address or home internet service has been used to download, view, send or somehow commit some type of crime involving pornography. The scammer demands a $7,000 payment to not disclose this "evidence" to law enforcement. This or any other threat to cause fear and demand money to keep you out of trouble is a SCAM! Do not fall victim to these predators and lose your hard-earned money. Some of these emails also contain "links" to click, such as "reset your password by clicking here." Some are more subtle and play off your curiosity, asking you if you've seen what's been written about you or"Is this Page 7 you...?" These are"phishing emails"and are scammers using fraudulent emails designed to trick you into providing personal information (social security numbers,banking/account information, computer logon/password information) or entice you into click a bogus link to load malware or potentially gain access to your computer/personal information. For more information about protecting your privacy, identity and online security, including how to report phishing emails to the Federal Trade Commission(FTC), along with other scams and consumer information, go to the FTC website https://www.consumer.ftc.gov/ or the FBI Internet Crime Complaint Center(IC3) at https://www.ic3.gov/. • di LOCK OBSERVE CARS SHOULD KEEP GARAGE ITEMS IN AND REPORT NEVER RUN DOORS CLOSED YOUR TRUNK UNATTENDED Page 8 Spokane County Sheriff's Office , ,COUN1 ' Regional Intelligence Group --- 4�a Spokane Valley Districts :`?F IBR Classification: Burglary -RIG 9 120 100 / \ A///4\ `e„..._,..................____4/ l Hill 80 I ---- 60 2015 2016 2017 40 • Calendar 2018 • • • 20 0 >- >- I J >- W >- F K K K K e, e, u - a z J in in in u a a e, 0 2 z Z Z m m m m Z Z a a 2 0 2 2 Z ce 2 Z u H u u a m <in a o w u_ u o z Year Month Count 2015 2016 2017 Calendar 2018 January 84 72 55 51 February 66 73 53 26 March 71 78 42 33 April 68 87 49 36 May 69 73 47 34 June 86 93 59 28 July 103 89 51 45 August 86 103 56 September 94 91 78 October 105 71 37 November 80 92 32 December 81 63 33 Grand Total 993 985 ilIl 592 i 253 * IBR Offense: Burglary/Breaking&Entering 220 Produced: 8/28/2018 For Law Enforcement Use Only This document is confidential and may not be further disseminated or released to any unauthorized persons pursuant to RCW 42.56.420 Spokane County Sheriff's Office ° ��� Regional Intelligence Group 10 Y --- . 4�a Spokane Valley Districts `?F IBR Classification: Murder NonNeg Manslaughter -RIG 9 2.5 2 1.5 X2015 2016 1 ■ * ■ A---4 2017 Calendar 2018 0.5 0 >- >- I J >- W >- F K K K K e, e, u - < z J in in in u a < e, 0 2 z Z z m m m m > > a a2 0 2 2 z cc 2 Z u H u u a m <in a o > u u_ u o inz Year Month Count 2015 2016 2017 Calendar 2018 January 1 February March 1 April May June 1 July 1 1 August 1 September October 2 November 1 1 1 December 1 Grand Total 5 4 11.11 2 = 1 *IBR Offense: Murder/Non-Negligent Manslaughter 09A Produced: 8/28/2018 For Law Enforcement Use Only This document is confidential and may not be further disseminated or released to any unauthorized persons pursuant to RCW 42.56.420 Spokane County Sheriff's OfficeCOUN1 ' ' Regional Intelligence Group ---. 4�a Spokane Valley Districts `?F IBR Classification: Identity Theft RIG 9 35 30 • •• • • 25 • • l i l : • • 20 • /. X2015 15 2016 2017 10 Calendar 2018 5 ••■ • 0 >- >- = J >- W >- H K K K K u a z J w w w w < < c, 0 2 Z Z Z m m m m > > a a0 2 0 2 2 z ce 2 Z in Hw w Q m < H U > u in a 0 0 in u_ wz 0 Year Month Count 2015 2016 2017 Calendar 2018 January 9 20 February 1 24 17 March 22 13 April 16 22 May 32 21 June 18 17 July 23 14 August 9 13 September 7 17 October 7 15 November 10 19 December 8 26 Grand Total MI j 42 234 i 124 *IBR Offense: Identity Theft 26F Produced: 8/28/2018 For Law Enforcement Use Only This document is confidential and may not be further disseminated or released to any unauthorized persons pursuant to RCW 42.56.420 Spokane County Sheriff's Office COUN1)' ' Regional Intelligence Group Spokane Valley Districts . .F IBR Classification: Fraud -RIG 9 80 70 fr------\\ 60 50 40 —•—2015 2016 30 "i 4a-2017 20 " Calendar 2018 10 0 } } = J } w } H K K K K cc cc u a z J u) w w w w a a cc a 2 Z Z Z m m m m z ce 2 Z w H w w a m a ui a o w w w O Z u, Year Month Count 2015 2016 2017 Calendar 2018 January 12 23 26 70 February 18 17 36 46 March 20 21 37 60 April 18 15 43 55 May 24 8 53 67 June 14 19 57 65 July 17 26 61 64 August 28 15 53 September 24 16 66 October 34 41 64 November 18 38 54 December 25 30 43 Grand Total 252 269 l 593 427 * IBR Offense: Fraud -Credit Card/ATM 26B, Fraud - False Pretenses/Swindling/Con Games 26A, & Fraud -Impersonation 26C Produced: 8/28/2018 For Law Enforcement Use Only This document is confidential and may not be further disseminated or released to any unauthorized persons pursuant to RCW 42.56.420 Spokane County Sheriff's Office COUN11' ' Regional Intelligence Group Spokane Valley Districts . .F IBR Classification: DUI RIG 9 45 • 40 li 35 • 30ATII � • • • • • 25i 1 I 1 Ft' At.fA. i • • • �\ 2015 20 • 7� 2016 —A—2017 15 Calendar 2018 10 • • • • • • 5 0 • >- >- = J >- W } F K K K K e, e, V - a z J in in in w < < e, 0 2 z Z Z m m m m Z Z a a0 2 0 2 2 Z ce 2 Z w H w w a m <in a o > w u_ w o z Year Month Count 2015 2016 2017 Calendar 2018 January 30 30 22 21 February 22 30 26 18 March 25 31 33 39 April 28 22 18 13 May 27 27 19 33 June 29 31 28 23 July 31 19 26 15 August 31 18 24 September 18 20 19 October 25 19 24 November 20 28 18 December 13 27 21 Grand Total milv_ 299 302 278 i 162 * IBR Offense: DUI 90D Produced: 8/28/2018 For Law Enforcement Use Only This document is confidential and may not be further disseminated or released to any unauthorized persons pursuant to RCW 42.56.420 Spokane County Sheriff's Office COUN1 ' ' Regional Intelligence Group Spokane Valley Districts . .F IBR Classification: Drugs RIG 9 70 • • • 60 • • 50 • •• •• •• • • 40 •• •• •• •• •• •• •• • 2015 30 I 2016 • 2017 • 20 Calendar 2018 • • 10 "T' •• •• • • --",1111.1111"'--",1111.1111"'0 '4111111111111111111"— 411.'1 } } = J } w } H K K K K cc cc u a z J w w w w a a cc a 2 Z Z Z m m m m z ce 2 Z w H w w a m a ui a o w w w O Z u, Year Month Count 2015 2016 2017 Calendar 2018 January 2 5 19 44 February 3 30 38 March 2 2 30 64 April 4 1 37 56 May 1 5 23 34 June 2 2 20 56 July 3 1 21 56 August 4 16 26 September 5 28 25 October 3 20 24 November 1 20 39 December 3 27 25 Grand Total 30 111.1 130 1111= 319 i 348 * IBR Offense: Drug Equipment Violations 35B &Drugs/Narcotics Violations 35A Produced: 8/28/2018 For Law Enforcement Use Only This document is confidential and may not be further disseminated or released to any unauthorized persons pursuant to RCW 42.56.420 Spokane County Sheriff's OfficeCOUN1'�� Regional Intelligence Group Spokane Valley Districts :. F IBR Classification: Theft From Motor Vehicle SIG 9 200 180 • • 160 •• •• • • 140 • 120 4 0 r le 100 2015 2016 80 , 141/4 w Aillh' 1 l 2017 60 Calendar 2018 40 • • 20 • 0 >- >- I J >- W } F K K K K e, e, V - a z J in in in w < a e, 0 2 z Z Z m m m m Z Z a a2 0 2 2 Z ce 2 Z w H w w a m <in a o > w u_ w o z Year Month Count 2015 2016 2017 Calendar 2018 January 134 101 99 77 February 124 76 104 33 March 96 72 94 79 April 62 134 131 62 May 84 108 78 69 June 68 177 107 66 July 85 139 97 107 August 92 131 70 September 109 103 118 October 111 124 70 November 91 153 54 December 110 118 70 Grand Total jilli II= 1166 _ 1436 1 1092 493 * IBR Offense:Theft From Motor Vehicle 23F Produced: 8/28/2018 For Law Enforcement Use Only This document is confidential and may not be further disseminated or released to any unauthorized persons pursuant to RCW 42.56.420 Spokane County Sheriff's Office COUN1), Regional Intelligence Group Spokane Valley Districts . .F IBR Classification: Motor Vehicle Theft RIG 9 120 100 80 60X2015/ ' 1 2016 1 I I I 1 2017 40 • Calendar 2018 • • 20 • 0 >- >- = J >- W } F K K K K K K U K 1 z J W W W W < < e, 0 z Z Z m m m m Z Z a a0 2 0 2 2 Z cc 2 Z w H w w a m <in a o > w u_ w o z Year Month Count 2015 2016 2017 Calendar 2018 January 62 112 44 36 February 64 53 38 24 March 53 66 44 28 April 53 75 41 27 May 71 59 27 24 June 58 80 28 24 July 73 73 41 39 August 60 39 36 September 78 35 43 October 65 51 40 November 59 33 34 December 78 39 28 Grand Total OM 774 111111 715 M. 444 i 202 * IBR Offense: Motor Vehicle Theft 240 Produced: 8/28/2018 For Law Enforcement Use Only This document is confidential and may not be further disseminated or released to any unauthorized persons pursuant to RCW 42.56.420 Spokane County Sheriff's Office „COUN1 ' ' Regional Intelligence Group --- . 4�a Spokane Valley Districts `?F IBR Classification: Robbery RIG 9 16 • 14 • • 12 \i/\ : : : •• •• • / 10 • g A2015 2016 hhk 6 \ 2017 Calendar 2018 4 2 I 0 >- >- = J >- W >- F K K K K e, e, u - a z J in in in u a < e, 0 2 z Z Z m m m m Z Z a a2 0 2 2 Z cc 2 Z u H u u a m <in a o w u_ u o z Year Month Count 2015 2016 2017 Calendar 2018 January 11 3 3 6 February 9 7 6 2 March 12 8 7 5 April 6 3 3 6 May 6 8 2 8 June 5 5 1 3 July 8 5 4 7 August 7 3 1 September 15 2 4 October 7 10 4 November 3 10 3 December 11 3 1 Grand Total 01 100 67 39 = 37 * IBR Offense: Robbery 120 Produced: 8/28/2018 For Law Enforcement Use Only This document is confidential and may not be further disseminated or released to any unauthorized persons pursuant to RCW 42.56.420 Spokane County Sheriff's Office couNi)' ' Regional Intelligence Group •Spokane Valley Districts :. F IBR Classification: Assault RIG 9 180 160 140 • 120 : • • 100 ` X2015 80 N. • -"</ , I H I H 2016 2017 60 •• • • • Calendar 2018 40 20 • •0 >- >- I J >- W } F K K K K e, e, V - a z J in in in w a a e, 0 2 z Z Z m m m m Z Z a a 2 0 2 2 Z ce 2 Z w H w w a m <in a o > w u_ w o z Year Month Count 2015 2016 2017 Calendar 2018 January 157 131 96 98 February 141 140 95 67 March 138 145 78 113 April 131 142 90 94 May 151 143 93 86 June 140 115 93 104 July 143 122 95 111 August 136 63 73 September 130 81 92 October 148 99 88 November 124 97 86 December 127 88 85 Grand Total 1666 1366 1064 673 * IBR Offense:Aggravated Assault 13A&Simple Assault 13B Produced: 8/28/2018 For Law Enforcement Use Only This document is confidential and may not be further disseminated or released to any unauthorized persons pursuant to RCW 42.56.420 Spokane County Sheriff's Office ° i�� Regional Intelligence Group --- . 4�a Spokane Valley Districts `'F IBR Classification: Theft RIG 9 300 250 200 1..–y�* -'° 150 —•-2015 2016 2017 100 Calendar 2018 50 0 >- >- I J >- W >- F K K K K e, e, V - a z J in in in w < a e, 0 2 z Z Z m m m m Z Z a a 2 0 2 2 Z ce 2 Z w H w w a m <in a o > w u_ w o z Year Month Count 2015 2016 2017 Calendar 2018 January 233 240 205 242 February 240 208 199 171 March 258 215 214 209 April 239 232 204 203 May 226 193 235 230 June 239 263 252 225 July 259 242 237 234 August 264 203 224 September 247 222 213 October 227 232 238 November 193 244 219 December 278 225 199 Grand Total 2903 2719 2639 1514 * IBR Offense:Theft-All Other 23H,Theft- Pocket-Picking 23A,Theft- Purse-Snatching 23B,Theft-Shoplifting 23C,Theft From Building 23D, Theft From Coin-Operated Machine 23E, &Theft of Motor Vehicle Parts/Accessories 23G Produced: 8/28/2018 For Law Enforcement Use Only This document is confidential and may not be further disseminated or released to any unauthorized persons pursuant to RCW 42.56.420 Spokane County Sheriff's Office „COUN1 ' ' Regional Intelligence Group --- . 4�a Spokane Valley Districts `?F IBR Classification: Rape RIG 9 18 \ ; • • 16 •• • •• • 14 • • • • • • 12 • • 10 l i 41k\: ,Ilr. 2015 8 2016 2017 6 • `.�4 Calendar 2018 . , , , : 4 • • 1 •• • • 2I •• • • •0 } } = J } w } H K K K K ec ec u a z J w w w w a a ec a 2 Z Z Z m m m m z ce 2 Z w H w w a m a ui a o 0 w w o wz D u, Year Month Count 2015 2016 2017 Calendar 2018 January 7 7 8 17 February 10 7 2 3 March 6 9 3 8 April 10 8 7 5 May 9 12 9 9 June 5 9 1 8 July 5 4 6 5 August 13 2 5 September 3 4 2 October 14 5 8 November 9 6 1 December 8 4 3 Grand Total MO j 99 77 mil 55 I . 55 *IBR Offense: Rape-Forcible 11A Produced: 8/28/2018 For Law Enforcement Use Only This document is confidential and may not be further disseminated or released to any unauthorized persons pursuant to RCW 42.56.420 Spokane County Sheriff's Office COUN11' ' Regional Intelligence Group Spokane Valley Districts . .F IBR Classification: Counterfeiting Forgery RIG 9 30 • • • • • 25 • •• • • • • • • • • • • • • • 20 • • • • f, 15 2015 • • • 2016 •i 10 / ,ill ,, , 2017 Ir Calendar 2018 5 •• •• •• • • • • • •0 } >- I J >- W >- F K K K K e, e, V < z J w w w w < < e, a 2 z Z Z m m m m Z Z < Z 0 2 0 2 2 Z cc 2 Z w H w w a m <in a o > w u_ w z „ 0 , z Year Month Count 2015 2016 2017 Calendar 2018 January 18 14 9 18 February 18 13 11 10 March 11 25 20 23 April 7 6 20 22 May 9 9 26 21 June 9 15 15 15 July 12 11 21 14 August 12 7 14 September 8 11 20 October 12 7 18 November 6 15 9 December 19 12 9 Grand Total 141 145 a 192 i 123 *IBR Offense: Counterfeiting/Forgery 250 Produced: 8/28/2018 For Law Enforcement Use Only This document is confidential and may not be further disseminated or released to any unauthorized persons pursuant to RCW 42.56.420 Spokane County Sheriff's OfficeC°U.- ,. Regional Intelligence Group F --- . Spokane Valley Districts :11 IBR Classification: Destruction Damage Vandalism RIG 9 250 200 150 2015 2016 100 2017 Calendar 2018 50 0 >- >- I - >- W >- F K KK K e, e, V — a z - w w w w < a e, 0 2 Z Z Z m m m m > > a a 2 0 2 2 z ce 2 Z w H w w a m < a o 0 w in o wz o Year Month Count 2015 2016 2017 Calendar 2018 January 162 133 159 145 February 130 111 148 95 March 127 148 136 121 April 126 151 173 127 May 130 134 139 142 June 130 176 143 139 July 125 154 178 140 August 141 160 149 September 130 118 160 October 156 165 119 November 129 196 132 December 163 161 106 Grand Total 1649 1807 1 1742 i 909 IBR Offense: Destruction/Damage/Vandalism 290 Produced: 8/28/2018 For Law Enforcement Use Only This document is confidential and may not be further disseminated or released to any unauthorized persons pursuant to RCW 42.56.420