2018, 09-11 Regular MeetingAGENDA
SPOKANE VALLEY CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING
FORMAL FORMAT MEETING
Tuesday, September 11, 2018 6:00 p.m.
Spokane Valley City Hall Council Chambers
10210 E Sprague Avenue
Council Requests Please Silence Your Cell Phones During Council Meeting
CALL TO ORDER
INVOCATION: Pastor Joe Pursch, Valley Fourth Memorial Church
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL
APPROVAL OF AGENDA
INTRODUCTION OF SPECIAL GUESTS AND PRESENTATIONS
COMMITTEE, BOARD, LIAISON SUMMARY REPORTS
MAYOR'S REPORT
PROCLAMATIONS: (1) Constitution Week, (2) Valleyfest
PUBLIC COMMENTS: This is an opportunity for the public to speak on any subject except those on this
agenda as action items. (Action items include public hearings, and those items under NEW BUSINESS.
Public Comments will be taken on those items at the time those items are discussed.) When you come to
the podium, please state your name and city residence for the record and limit remarks to three minutes.
1. PUBLIC HEARING: 2019 Budget Revenues (including property tax) — Chelsie Taylor
2. CONSENT AGENDA: Consists of items considered routine which are approved as a group. Any
member of Council may ask that an item be removed from the Consent Agenda to be considered separately.
Proposed Motion: I move to approve the Consent Agenda.
a. Approval of claim vouchers on Sept 11, 2018 Request for Council Action Form Total: $2,739,582.23
b. Approval of Payroll for Pay Period Ending August 31, 2018: $503,337.80
c. Approval Motion Setting October 9 Budget Hearing
d. Approval of Centennial Trail Amended Contract
e. Approval of August 21, 2018 Special Joint Council/Lodging Task Advisory Committee Meeting
f. Approval of August 21, 2018 Council Meeting Minutes, Study Session
NEW BUSINESS:
3. First Reading Ordinance 18-020 Amending Business License — Erik Lamb [public comment]
4. First Reading Ordinance 18-021 Amending SVMC 2.10.020, Salary Commission — Cary Driskell
[public comment]
5. Motion Consideration: Consultant Contract Glenrose Floodplain Study — Henry Allen, Deanna Horton
[public comment]
Council Agenda 09-11-18 Formal Format Meeting Page 1 of 2
PUBLIC COMMENTS: This is an opportunity for the public to speak on any subject except those on this
agenda as action items. (Action items include public hearings, and those items under NEW BUSINESS.
Public Comments will be taken on those items at the time those items are discussed.) When you come to
the podium, please state your name and city residence for the record and limit remarks to three minutes.
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS:
6. Spokane Valley Express System — Elisha Heath
7. City Delegation to Washington, D.C. — Mark Calhoun
8. Aging and Long Term Care of Eastern Washington — Mark Calhoun
9. Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins
INFORMATION ONLY (will not be reported or discussed): n/a
CITY MANAGER COMMENTS
ADJOURNMENT
General Meeting Schedule (meeting schedule is always subject to change)
Regular Council meetings are generally held every Tuesday beginning at 6:00 p.m.
The Formal meeting formats are generally held the 2"-1 and 41 Tuesdays. Formal meeting have time
allocated for general public comments as well as comments after each action item.
The Study Session formats (the less formal meeting) are generally held the 1St3d and 5t1 Tuesdays.
Study Session formats normally do not have time allocated for general public comments; but if action items
are included, comments are permitted after those specific action items.
NOTICE: Individuals planning to attend the meeting who require special assistance to accommodate
physical, hearing, or other impairments, please contact the City Clerk at (509) 720-5102 as soon as possible
so that arrangements may be made.
Council Agenda 09-11-18 Formal Format Meeting
Page 2 of 2
Spokane
Valley
'l0
ro cta.matio n
City of Spokane vatTy, Washington
Constitution Week
WHEREAS, September 17, 2018, marks the two hundred thirty first anniversary of the drafting
of the Constitution of the United States of America by the Constitutional
Convention; and
WHEREAS, It is fitting and proper to accord official recognition to this magnificent document
and its memorable anniversary, and to the patriotic celebrations which will
commemorate the occasion; and
WHEREAS, Public Law 915 guarantees the issuing of a proclamation each year by the
President of the United States of America designating September 17 23, as
Constitution Week.
NOW, THEREFORE, 1, Rod Higgins, Mayor of the City of Spokane Valley, on behalf of the
Spokane Valley City Councilmembers, do hereby proclaim the week of September 17 - 23 as
Constitution Week
and 1 encourage all citizens to reaffirm the ideals the Framers of the Constitution had in 1787
by vigilantly protecting the freedoms guaranteed to us through this guardian of our liberties,
remembering lost rights may never be regained.
Dated this 11th day of September, 2018.
L.R. Higgins, Mayor
Spokane
Valley
'lt
roct rm rtion.
City of Spo4ne Valley, Washington
)alreyfest
WHEREAS, Valleyfest has been an annual tradition bringing the valley community together
since 1990; and
WHEREAS, Valleyfest three-day event provides entertainment, social opportunities and
recognizes area youth for their talents; and
WHEREAS, Valleyfest brings visitors from throughout the region to learn about and enjoy all
that our valley community has to offer; and
WHEREAS, Valleyfest brings local and regional leaders together, helping build stronger
communities; and
WHEREAS, Valleyfest attracts over 15,000 attendees to the parade and over 35,000 attendees
to the Mirabeau Point Park events, and provides a positive economic impact in
dollars spent at the event and at local businesses in the event area; and
WHEREAS, Valleyfest provides the opportunity for non profits to raise awareness of their
efforts on behalf of citizens in Spokane Valley; and
WHEREAS, Valleyfest provides businesses the opportunity to promote their products and
services to gain new customers, provide jobs, and generate taxes that benefit our
community.
NOW, THEREFORE, 1, Rod Higgins, Mayor of the City of Spokane Valley, on behalf of the
Mayor and Council of the City of Spokane Valley and its citizens, do hereby invite members
within and without our community, to join in the September 21 through 23, 2018 festival known
as
Valleyfest
and I encourage all citizens and community members throughout the region and beyond, to enjoy
this wonderful local festival.
Dated this 11th day of September, 2018
L.R. Higgins, Mayor
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: September 11, 2018
Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business
❑ information ❑ admin. report
Department Director Approval:
❑ new business ® public hearing
❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Public Hearing — 2019 Budget Revenues — Including Property Tax
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: State budget law.
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: No formal Council action has been taken on the 2019
Budget. A proposed budget is currently under review by the City Manager who will present his
Preliminary 2019 Budget to the Council on September 25, 2018.
BACKGROUND: This marks the third occasion where the Council will discuss the 2019 Budget
and by the time the Council is scheduled to adopt the 2019 Budget on November 13, 2018,
Council will have had an opportunity to discuss it on eight separate occasions, including three
public hearings to gather input from citizens:
• June 12 Council Budget Retreat
• August 22
• September 11
• September 25
• October 9
• October 23
• November 13
• November 13
Admin report: Estimated 2019 revenues and expenditures
Public hearing #1 on 2019 revenues and expenditures
City Manager's presentation of preliminary 2019 Budget
Public hearing #2 on 2019 Budget
First reading on ordinance adopting the 2019 Budget
Public hearing #3 on 2019 Budget
Second reading on ordinance adopting the 2019 Budget
State law requires that the City hold a public hearing on revenue sources for the upcoming year's
budget in order to consider input from the public. An administrative report was presented to
Council on this topic on August 21st and the public hearing is set for this evening. Until City
Council adoption all figures currently included in the 2019 Budget worksheets are preliminary and
subject to change by the City Manager.
2019 Budget Overview:
• The 2019 Budget currently includes appropriations of $73,853,656 including $16,207,362 in
capital expenditures, comprised in -part of:
o $5,232,987 in Fund #303 Street Capital Projects.
o $1,812,095 in Fund #309 Park Capital Projects.
o $7,238,200 in Fund #311 Pavement Preservation including $972,300 financed by the
General Fund.
o $503,480 in Fund #314 Railroad Grade Separation Projects.
o $1,282,600 in Stormwater Management Fund #402 and Aquifer Protection Area Fund
#403 projects.
• To partially offset the $16,207,362 in capital costs we anticipate $7,491,558 in grant revenues
which results in 46.22% of capital expenditures being covered with State and Federal money.
• Budgets will be adopted across 24 separate funds.
1
• The full time equivalent employee (FTE) count will increase by 4.50 from 89.25 in 2018 to
93.75 in 2019. This includes the reduction of a vacant administrative assistant position in the
City Manager's office from 1.0 to 0.5 FTE, and the addition of 5.0 FTEs requested by the
Community and Public Works Department that are necessary to meet project needs going
into the future and of these, the wage related costs of 3.1 FTEs will be paid through capital
project that are in large part financed with grant revenues dedicated to those projects. Of the
5 additional FTEs:
o 2 will be engineers with wages allocated 20% each to the Engineering Division in the
General Fund (for an increase of 0.4 FTEs) and 80% to the Street Capital Projects Fund
#303 (for an increase of 1.6 FTEs). The primary responsibilities of these positions will be
to focus on capital projects.
o 3 will be construction inspectors with wages allocated 50% each to the Street Capital
Projects Fund #303 (for an increase of 1.5 FTEs) and 50% each to the Street Fund #101
(for an increase of 1.5 FTEs). During the construction season (April through October) the
primary responsibility of these positions will be to focus on capital projects. During winter
season operations (November to March) the primary responsibility of these positions will
be snow operations and winter maintenance.
o It is noteworthy that these 5.0 additional FTEs are largely necessary to meet capital
construction needs that are in large part grant financed. If at some point in the future the
number and/or magnitude of capital projects decreases due to reduced grant opportunities
or some other currently unforeseen circumstance, we will begin to eliminate these
positions.
The FTE count is allocated among City funds as follows:
General Fund #001
Street O&M Fund #101
Street Capital Projects Fund #303
Stormwater Fund #402
2018
Budget
74.63
5.72
4.50
4.40
2019
Reallocate
Staff
-0.50
0.50
0.50
-0.50
2019
City Mngr
Change
-0.5
0
0
0
2019
CPW
Request
0.4
1.5
3.1
0
Total
After
Changes
74.03
7.72
8.10
3.90
89.25 0 -0.5 5 93.75
Pertaining Specifically to the General Fund:
• The 2019 recurring revenue estimate of $45,396,900 is $2,389,300 or 5.56% greater than the
2018 budget of $43,007,600.
• The 2019 recurring expenditure proposal of $41,685,569 is $776,925 or 1.90% greater than
the 2018 amended appropriation of $40,908,644.
• Budgeted recurring revenues currently exceed recurring expenditures by $3,711,331 or
8.18% of recurring revenues.
• Nonrecurring revenues total $40,422 and include:
o $40,422 is the remaining transfer in from the Solid Waste Fund #106 as a repayment to
the General Fund for various studies and fees related to the Solid Waste program paid
out of the General Fund in the years of 2013 and 2014. The repayment will have occurred
over five years beginning in 2015 and ending in 2019.
2
• Nonrecurring expenditures total $1,342,000 and include:
o $107,000 for Information Technology expenditures including:
• $22,000 to replace outdated copiers
• $50,000 to upgrade storage devices at CenterPlace
• $30,000 for a whole room UPS for the server room at City Hall
o $50,000 for workstations and carpet replacement at the police precinct
o $25,000 for retail recruitment services
o $160,000 transfer out to the Parks Capital Projects Fund #309 to construct a new restroom
at Browns Park
o $1,000,000 transfer out to the Parks Capital Projects Fund #309 to complete additional
improvements at Browns Park
• The total of 2019 recurring and nonrecurring revenues exceeds total expenditures by
$2,409,753.
• The projected ending fund balance for the General Fund at the end of 2019 is currently
$32,993,418 or 79.15% of recurring expenditures.
Other Funds:
2019 Budget appropriations (expenditures) in the other funds total $30,826,087 as follows:
Fund
Number
Fund
Name
2019
Appropriation
101 Street Fund
103 Paths and Trails Fund
104 Hotel / Motel Tax - Tourism Facilities Fund
105 Hotel / Motel Tax Fund
106 Solid Waste Fund
107 PEG Fund
120 CenterPlace Operating Reserve Fund
121 Service Level Stabilization Reserve Fund
122 Winter Weather Reserve Fund
204 Debt Service Fund
301 REET 1 Capital Projects Fund
302 REET 2 Capital Projects Fund
303 Street Capital Projects Fund
309 Parks Capital Projects Fund
310 Civic Facilities Capital Projects Fund
311 Pavement Preservation Fund
312 Capital Reserve Fund
313 City Hall Construction Fund
314 Railroad Grade Separation Projects Fund
402 Stormwater Management Fund
403 Aquifer Protection Area Fund
501 Equipment Rental and Replacement Fund
502 Risk Management Fund
4,918,044
0
0
655,000
1,726,300
71,100
0
0
500,000
998,350
1,357,058
984,209
5,232,987
1,812,095
0
7,288,200
1,239,332
0
503,480
2,297,332
832,600
20,000
390,000
30, 826, 087
3
Primary sources of revenues in these other funds include:
• Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax revenue that is collected by the State and remitted to the Street Fund
is anticipated to be $2,101,100.
• Telephone Tax revenues remitted to the City that supports Street Fund operations and
maintenance are anticipated to be $1,700,000.
• Real Estate Excise Tax (REET) revenues that are in large part used to match grant financed
street projects are anticipated to total $2,000,000.
• Hotel / Motel Tax revenues that are dedicated to the promotion of visitors and tourism are
anticipated to be $990,000 ($600,000 in the Hotel/Motel Tax Fund #105 and $390,000 in the
Hotel/Motel Tax — Tourism Facilities Fund #104).
• Stormwater Management Fees that are estimated at $1,890,000.
• Aquifer Protection Area Fees are estimated at $460,000.
Funding Challenges:
• Declining revenues in the Street O&M Fund #101 that will impact our ability to deliver historic
levels of service. Fund #101 is dependent upon motor vehicle fuel tax revenues and telephone
utility tax revenues.
o Motor vehicle fuel taxes have increased slightly due to recent State legislation; however,
they are generally flat or declining in recent years due to improvements in vehicle fuel
mileage.
o Telephone utility taxes have been declining at an average of 5.18% per year from 2009
through 2017. We believe the decline is primarily due to the elimination of land lines by
individual households. The revenues from this tax reached a high of $3.1 million in 2009
(the year the tax was implemented) and is currently estimated to generate $1.7 million in
2019.
o At the June 12, 2018 Budget Workshop, Council requested that Staff prepare a 2019
Street O&M Fund Budget that continues to deliver historic levels of services despite the
fact that telephone utility tax revenues have continued to decline. At that time Council was
aware that recurring revenues were substantially exceeded by recurring expenditures and
asked Staff to prepare a budget that resolves this funding imbalance with a one-time
transfer during 2019 of Capital Reserve Fund #312 money, The necessary transfer is
$907,544 and this is reflected in both Fund numbers 101 and 312.
• Balancing the cost of pavement preservation against other transportation and infrastructure
needs.
o Pavement Preservation Fund #311 is relying more heavily on REET revenues due to an
elimination of the contribution from the Street Fund #101 related to declining revenues
and an elimination of contributions from the Civic Facility Replacement Fund #123. The
fund balance in Fund #123 was entirely depleted at the end of 2016, and the fund was
closed during 2017.
o Reliance on REET revenues to fund pavement preservation in Fund #311 limits the City's
ability to provide match funding for State and Federal grants received for other street
projects.
o Railroad grade separation projects (overpasses and underpasses) are exceptionally
expensive endeavors and are largely beyond the City's ability to finance through existing
sources of revenue. The City has secured funding for the Barker Rd. Grade Separation
project; however, funding is still needed for other grade separation projects within the City.
OPTIONS: State law requires a public hearing on 2019 estimated revenues and expenditures.
4
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: As the purpose of the public hearing is to gather input
from the public in regard to the 2019 Budget, no action is requested at this time.
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Given that the budget is not scheduled to be adopted by the
Council until November 13, 2018, it is possible the figures may be modified as we refine estimates
of revenues and expenditures.
STAFF CONTACT: Chelsie Taylor, Finance Director
ATTACHMENTS:
• Power Point presentation.
• Assorted 2019 Budget information:
o Pages 1-12 Budget summary information with detail by fund.
o Page 13-14 General Fund budget change from June 12 to September 11
o Page 15-16 General Fund revenue and expenditure line -item changes.
o Page 17-19 General Fund department changes from 2018 to 2019.
o Page 20 Full-time equivalent employees (FTEs).
5
City of Spokane Valley
2019 Budget Discussion
Public Hearing #1
2019 Estimated Revenues and Expenditures
September 11, 2018
2019 Budget Summary
All Funds
Total appropriations across all City Funds of $73.9 million
including:
$43 million in the General Fund which is comprised of $41.7 million
recurring and $1.3 million nonrecurring.
$30.8 million spread across 23 additional funds.
$16.2 million in capital expenditures.
2019 Budget Summary
All Funds
FTE count proposed to be 93.75 employees in 2019.
Increase is result of adding 5 FTEs and reducing a vacant
administrative assistant position by 0.5 FTE.
Summary changes in FTE from 2018:
General Fund #001
Street O&M Fund #101
Street Capital Projects Fund #303
Stormwater Fund #402
2018
Budget
74.63
5.72
4.50
4.40
2019
Reallocate
Staff
- 0.50
0.50
0.50
- 0.50
2019
City Mngr
Change
-0.5
0
0
0
2019
CPW
Request
0.4
1.5
3.1
0
Total
After
Changes
74.03
7.72
8.10
3.90
89.25 0 -0.5 5 93.75
3
2019 Budget Summary
All Funds
The addition 5 FTEs have been requested by the
Community and Public Works Department, and consist of:
2 Engineers (0.4 FTE to General Fund & 1.6 FTEs to Fund #303) —
primary responsibilities will be capital projects.
3 Construction Inspectors (1.5 FTEs to Fund #303 & 1.5 FTEs to
Fund #101) — primary responsibilities will be capital project
inspections and snow operations.
These 5 FTEs are to meet construction needs on projects that
are primarily grant financed.
If needs were to decrease in the future, the City will begin to
eliminate these positions.
General Fund
REVENUES:
Total recurring 2019 revenues of $45,396,900 as compared
to $43,007,600 in 2018 for an increase of $2,389,300 or
5.56%.
All revenue estimates are based upon a combination of
historical collections and future projections with some
increasing and others decreasing.
2 largest sources are Sales Tax and Property Tax which are
collectively estimated to account for $37,897,300 or 83.48%
of 2019 General Fund recurring revenues.
General Fund
General sales tax collections are estimated at
$22,917,000, an increase of $2,035,100 or 9.75% over the
2018 Budget.
Property Tax levy is not proposed to include the 1%
increase authorized by State law.
2019 Levy is estimated at $11,954,400
Levy assumes we start with the 2018 levy of $11,804,400 +
estimated new construction of $150,000
General Fund
Nonrecurring revenues include $40,422 for Solid Waste
Fund #106 repayments to the General Fund.
This is the last of the repayments to the General Fund.
General Fund
EXPENDITURES:
2018 recurring expenditure proposal of $41,685,569 as
compared to $40,908,644 in 2018 for an increase of
$776,925 or 1.90%.
Recurring revenues currently exceed recurring
expenditures by $3,711,331 or 8.18% of recurring
revenues.
General Fund
Nonrecurring expenditures total $1,342,000 and include:
$107,000 of IT related capital replacements
$50,000 for workstations and carpet at the precinct
$25,000 for a retail recruitment contract
$1,160,000 in transfers out to Fund #309 for:
a restroom at Browns Park, and
other improvements at Browns Park
General Fund
The total of 2019 recurring and nonrecurring revenues
exceeds total expenditures by $2,409,753.
Projected fund balance at the end of 2019 is currently
$32,993,418 or 79.15% of recurring expenditures.
Other Funds
Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax revenue that is collected by the
State and remitted to the Street Fund is anticipated to be
$2,101,100.
Telephone Taxes that are remitted to the City and support
Street Fund operations and maintenance are anticipated
to be $1,700,000.
Real Estate Excise Tax (REET) revenues that are in large
part used to match grant financed street projects are
anticipated to total $2,000,000.
11
Other Funds
Hotel/Motel Tax revenues that are dedicated to the promotion of
visitors and tourism are anticipated to be $990,000.
Stormwater Management Fees of $1,890,000.
Aquifer Protection Area fees of $460,000.
Grant Revenues of $7,491,558:
Fund #303 — Street Capital Projects - $4,208,681
Fund #309 — Parks Capital Projects - $572,308
Fund #311 — Pavement Preservation - $1,820,000
Fund #314 — RR Grade Separation Projects - $467,369
Fund #402 — Stormwater Fund - $106,000
Fund #403 — Aquifer Protection Area Fund - $317,200
12
Other Funds —Challenges
Declining revenues in the Street O&M Fund #101 that will
impact our ability to deliver historic levels of service.
Telephone utility tax revenues continue to decrease.
2019 Budget reflects a one-time transfer of $907,000 from Capital
Reserve Fund #312 to balance revenues and expenses in Fund
#101
Balancing the cost of pavement preservation against other
transportation and infrastructure needs.
Use of REET for pavement preservation limits availability of funds
for grant matching.
Railroad grade separation projects
13
Future Council Budget Discussions
Sept. 25 — City Manager presentation of Preliminary 2019
Budget
Oct. 9 — Public hearing #2 on 2019 Budget
Oct. 23 — First reading of ordinance adopting 2019
Budget.
Nov. 13 — Public hearing #3 and second reading of
ordinance adopting 2019 Budget.
P:\Finance\2019 Budget\Budget Worksheets\RCAs and Intros and PowerPoint Presentations\2018 09 11\budget summary as of 2018 09 11.xlsx
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA
2019 Budget
2018
As
Adopted
1st
Amendment
2nd
Amendment
As
Amended
#001 - GENERAL FUND
RECURRING ACTIVITY
2019
Proposed
Budget
9/11/2018
Difference Between
2018 and 2019
OA
Revenues
Property Tax 11,796,100 0 0 11,796,100 11,954,400 158,300 1.34%
Sales Tax 20,881,900 0 0 20,881,900 22,917,000 2,035,100 9.75%
Sales Tax - Public Safety 967,800 0 0 967,800 1,081,900 114,100 11.79%
Sales Tax - Criminal Justice 1,738,000 0 0 1,738,000 1,944,000 206,000 11.85%
Gambling Tax and Leasehold Excise Tax 381,000 0 0 381,000 387,000 6,000 1.57%
Franchise Fees/Business Registration 1,210,000 0 0 1,210,000 1,224,000 14,000 1.16%
State Shared Revenues 2,109,600 0 0 2,109,600 1,909,800 (199,800) (9.47%)
Fines and Forfeitures/Public Safety 1,319,900 0 0 1,319,900 1,078,500 (241,400) (18.29%)
Community and Public Works 1,684,100 0 0 1,684,100 1,882,300 198,200 11.77%
Recreation Program Revenues 633,300 0 0 633,300 628,800 (4,500) (0.71%)
Miscellaneous Department Revenue 1,000 0 0 1,000 1,000 0 0.00%
Miscellaneous & Investment Interest 201,800 0 0 201,800 358,200 156,400 77.50%
Transfers in - #101 (street admin) 39,700 0 0 39,700 0 (39,700) (100.00%)
Transfers in - #105 (h/m tax -CP advertising) 30,000 0 0 30,000 30,000 0 0.00%
Transfers in - #402 (storm admin) 13,400 0 0 13,400 0 (13,400) (100.00%)
Total Recurring Revenues 43,007,600 0 0 43,007,600 45,396,900 2,389,300 5.56%
Expenditures
City Council 548,494 0 1,593 550,087 544,903 (5,184) (0.94%)
City Manager 956,245 0 455 956,700 944,035 (12,665) (1.32%)
City Attorney 594,752 7,000 455 602,207 610,549 8,342 1.39%
Public Safety 25,464,251 0 0 25,464,251 25,927,304 463,053 1.82%
Deputy City Manager 450,663 0 228 450,891 267,044 (183,847) (40.77%)
Finance / IT 1,339,064 0 910 1,339,974 1,402,497 62,523 4.67%
Human Resources 275,387 0 5,028 280,415 297,421 17,006 6.06%
City Hall Operations and Maintenance 306,043 0 228 306,271 290,543 (15,728) (5.14%)
Community & Public Works - Engineering 1,572,947 56,118 228 1,629,293 1,816,141 186,848 11.47%
Community & Public Works - Economic Dev 970,642 0 228 970,870 1,018,772 47,902 4.93%
Community & Public Works - Building & Planninc 2,265,677 (56,118) 228 2,209,787 2,248,698 38,911 1.76%
Parks & Rec - Administration 301,083 0 228 301,311 335,958 34,647 11.50%
Parks & Rec - Maintenance 893,700 0 0 893,700 893,500 (200) (0.02%)
Parks & Rec - Recreation 260,574 0 228 260,802 253,622 (7,180) (2.75%)
Parks& Rec- Aquatics 492,900 0 0 492,900 491,153 (1,747) (0.35%)
Parks & Rec - Senior Center 98,229 0 0 98,229 101,215 2,986 3.04%
Parks & Rec -CenterPlace 910,468 0 228 910,696 949,414 38,718 4.25%
General Government 1,261,610 0 0 1,261,610 1,332,650 71,040 5.63%
Transfers out - #204 (2016 LTGO debt service) 399,350 0 0 399,350 401,250 1,900 0.48%
Transfers out - #309 (park capital projects) 160,000 0 0 160,000 160,000 0 0.00%
Transfers out - #311 (pavement preservation) 962,700 0 0 962,700 972,300 9,600 1.00%
Transfers out - #501 (CenterPlace kitchen reserve) 36,600 0 0 36,600 36,600 0 0.00%
Transfers out - #502 (insurance premium) 370,000 0 0 370,000 390,000 20,000 5.41 %
Total Recurring Expenditures 40,891,379 7,000 10,265 40,908,644 41,685,569 776,925 1.90%
Recurring Revenues Over (Under)
Recurring Expenditures 2,116,221 (7,000) (10,265) 2,098,956 3,711,331
Page 1 of 20
P:\Finance\2019 Budget\Budget Worksheets\RCAs and Intros and PowerPoint Presentations\2018 09 11\budget summary as of 2018 09 11.xlsx
#001 - GENERAL FUND - continued
NONRECURRING ACTIVITY
Revenues
Transfers in - #106 (solid waste repayment)
Miscellaneous
Total Nonrecurring Revenues
Expenditures
General Government - IT capital replacements 115,000 0 0 115,000 107,000 (8,000) (6.96%)
City Attorney (part-time attorney furniture) 4,809 0 0 4,809 0 (4,809) (100.00%)
Public Safety (full facility generator) 100,000 0 0 100,000 0 (100,000) (100.00%)
Public Safety (carpet & workstation replacement) 0 0 0 0 50,000 50,000 0.00%
Deputy City Manager (Q -Alert software) 11,700 0 0 11,700 0 (11,700) (100.00%)
Community & Econ Dev (retail recruitment) 50,000 0 0 50,000 25,000 (25,000) (50.00%)
Parks & Rec (Flooring in Great Room & Dining Room 50,000 0 0 50,000 0 (50,000) (100.00%)
Parks & Rec (CP reseal two restroom floors) 3,000 0 0 3,000 0 (3,000) (100.00%)
Generator for City Hall 0 200,000 0 200,000 0 (200,000) (100.00%)
Transfers out - #309 (CP outdoor venue Phase 1) 200,000 0 0 200,000 0 (200,000) (100.00%)
Transfers out - #309 (Browns Park lighting & path) 200,000 0 0 200,000 0 (200,000) (100.00%)
Transfers out - #309 (Browns Park restroom) 0 0 0 0 160,000 160,000 0.00%
Transfers out - #309 (Browns Park other) 0 0 0 0 1,000,000 1,000,000 0.00%
Transfers out - #122 (replenish reserve) 0 490,000 0 490,000 0 (490,000) (100.00%)
Transfers out -#312 (misccapital projects) 1,000,000 0 0 1,000,000 0 (1,000,000) (100.00%)
Transfers out - #312('15fund bal>50%) 0 2,795,429 0 2,795,429 0 (2,795,429) (100.00%)
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA
2019 Budget
2018
As
Adopted
1st
Amendment
2nd
Amendment
As
Amended
2019
Proposed
Budget
40,425 0 0 40,425 40,422
0
0
0 0 0
9/11/2018
Difference Between
2018 and 2019
OA
(3) (0.01%)
0 0.00%
40,425 0 0 40,425 40,422 (3) (0.01%)
Total Nonrecurring Expenditures 1,734,509 3,485,429 0 5,219,938 1,342,000 (3,877,938) (74.29%)
Nonrecurring Revenues Over (Under)
Nonrecurring Expenditures
Excess (Deficit) of Total Revenues
Over (Under) Total Expenditures
Beginning unrestricted fund balance
Ending unrestricted fund balance
Fund balance as a percent of recurring expenditures
(1,694,084) (3,485,429) 0 (5,179,513) (1,301,578)
422,137 (3,492,429) (10,265) (3,080,557) 2,409,753
33,664,222
34,086,359
83.36%
Page 2 of 20
33,664,222 30,583,665
30,583,665
74.76%
32,993,418
79.15%
P:\Finance\2019 Budget\Budget Worksheets\RCAs and Intros and PowerPoint Presentations\2018 09 11\budget summary as of 2018 09 11.xlsx
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA
2019 Budget
2018
As
Adopted
1st
Amendment
2nd
Amendment
As
Amended
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
#101 - STREET FUND
RECURRING ACTIVITY
2019
Proposed
Budget
9/11/2018
Difference Between
2018 and 2019
OA
Revenues
Utility Tax 1,900,000 0 0 1,900,000 1,700,000 (200,000) (10.53%)
Motor Vehicle Fuel (Gas) Tax 2,052,400 0 0 2,052,400 2,092,300 39,900 1.94%
Multimodal Transportation Revenue 133,800 0 0 133,800 132,200 (1,600) (1.20%)
Right -of -Way Maintenance Fee 70,000 0 0 70,000 70,000 0 0.00%
Investment Interest 6,000 0 0 6,000 6,000 0 0.00%
Miscellaneous 10,000 0 0 10,000 10,000 0 0.00%
Total Recurring Revenues 4,172,200 0 0 4,172,200 4,010,500 (161,700) (3.88%)
Expenditures
Wages / Benefits / Payroll Taxes 771,019 0 0 771,019 1,044,547 273,528 35.48%
Supplies 112,500 0 0 112,500 113,300 800 0.71%
Services & Charges 2,141,751 0 455 2,142,206 2,308,818 166,612 7.78%
Snow Operations 504,800 0 0 504,800 497,200 (7,600) (1.51%)
Intergovernmental Payments 851,000 0 0 851,000 855,000 4,000 0.47%
Transfers out - #001 39,700 0 0 39,700 0 (39,700) (100.00%)
Transfers out - #311 (pavement preservation) 67,342 0 0 67,342 0 (67,342) (100.00%)
Vehicle rentals - #501 (non -plow vehicle rental) 77,929 0 0 77,929 77,929 0 0.00%
Vehicle rentals - #501 (plow replace.) 21,250 0 0 21,250 21,250 0 0.00%
Total Recurring Expenditures 4,587,291 0 455 4,587,746 4,918,044 330,298 7.20%
Recurring Revenues Over (Under)
Recurring Expenditures (415,091) 0 (455) (415,546) (907,544)
NONRECURRING ACTIVITY
Revenues
Transfers in - #312
Miscellaneous
0
0
0 0 0 907,544 907,544 0.00%
0 0 0 0 0 0.00%
Total Nonrecurring Revenues 0 0 0 0 907,544 907,544 0.00%
Expenditures
Battery backups for intersections 15,000 0 0 15,000 0 (15,000) (100.00%)
Total Nonrecurring Expenditures 15,000 0 0 15,000 0 (15,000) (100.00%)
Nonrecurring Revenues Over (Under)
Nonrecurring Expenditures (15,000) 0 0 (15,000) 907,544
Excess (Deficit) of Total Revenues
Over (Under) Total Expenditures (430,091) 0 (455) (430,546) 0
Beginning fund balance 1,067,294 1,067,294 636,748
Ending fund balance 637,203 636,748 636,748
#103 - PATHS & TRAILS FUND
Revenues
Motor Vehicle Fuel (Gas) Tax 8,700 0 0 8,700 8,800 100 1.15%
Investment Interest 0 0 0 0 400 400 0.00%
Total revenues 8,700 0 0 8,700 9,200 500 5.75%
Expenditures
Transfers out - #309 (Appleway Trail - Sullivan to Cc 0 50,000 0 50,000 0 (50,000) (100.00%)
Total expenditures 0 50,000 0 50,000 0 (50,000) (100.00%)
Revenues over (under) expenditures 8,700 (41,300) 9,200
Beginning fund balance 46,324 46,324 5,024
Ending fund balance 55,024 5,024 14,224
Page 3 of 20
P:\Finance\2019 Budget\Budget Worksheets\RCAs and Intros and PowerPoint Presentations\2018 09 11\budget summary as of 2018 09 11.xlsx
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA
2019 Budget
2018
As
Adopted
1st
Amendment
2nd
Amendment
As
Amended
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS - continued
#104 - HOTEL / MOTEL TAX - TOURISM FACILITIES FUND
Revenues
Hotel/Motel Tax
Investment Interest
Transfers in - #105
Total revenues
Expenditures
Capital Outlay
Total expenditures
Revenues over (under) expenditures
Beginning fund balance
Ending fund balance
377,000
1,500
0
2019
Proposed
Budget
9/11/2018
Difference Between
2018 and 2019
OA
O 0 377,000 390,000 13,000 3.45%
O 0 1,500 7,000 5,500 366.67%
O 250,000 250,000 0 (250,000) (100.00%)
378,500 0 250,000 628,500 397,000 (231,500) (36.83%)
0
O 0 0 0 0 0.00%
0
O 0 0 0 0 0.00%
378,500
1,228,595
1,607,095
628,500 397,000
1,228,595 1,857,095
1,857,095 2,254,095
#105 - HOTEL / MOTEL TAX FUND
Revenues
Hotel/Motel Tax 580,000 0 0 580,000 600,000 20,000 3.45%
Investment Interest 1,000 0 0 1,000 2,000 1,000 100.00%
Total revenues
581,000 0 0 581,000 602,000 21,000 3.61%
Expenditures
Transfers out - #001 30,000 0 0 30,000 30,000 0 0.00%
Transfers out - #104 0 0 250,000 250,000 0 (250,000) (100.00%)
Tourism Promotion 572,000 0 (250,000) 322,000 625,000 303,000 94.10%
Total expenditures 602,000 0 0 602,000 655,000 53,000 8.80%
Revenues over (under) expenditures (21,000) (21,000) (53,000)
Beginning fund balance 221,867 221,867 200,867
Ending fund balance 200,867 200,867 147,867
#106 - SOLID WASTE FUND
Revenues
Solid Waste Administrative Fee 225,000 0 0 225,000 225,000 0 0.00%
Solid Waste Road Wear Fee 0 0 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,500,000 500,000 50.00%
Grant Proceeds 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%
Investment Interest 0 0 0 0 1,300 1,300 0.00%
Total revenues 225,000 0 1,000,000 1,225,000 1,726,300 501,300 40.92%
Expenditures
Education/Contract Admin/General Fund reimb 184,575 0 0 184,575 185,878 1,303 0.71%
Transfers out - #001 40,425 0 0 40,425 40,422 (3) (0.01%)
Transfers out - #311 0 0 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,500,000 500,000 50.00%
Total expenditures 225,000 0 1,000,000 1,225,000 1,726,300 501,300 40.92%
Revenues over (under) expenditures 0 0 0
Beginning fund balance 190,682 190,682 190,682
Ending fund balance 190,682 190,682 190,682
#107 - PEG FUND
Revenues
Comcast PEG contribution 79,000 0 0 79,000 76,000 (3,000) (3.80%)
Investment Interest 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%
Total revenues
79,000 0 0 79,000 76,000 (3,000) (3.80%)
Expenditures
PEG Reimbursement - CMTV 40,200 0 0 40,200 40,100 (100) (0.25%)
Capital Outlay 31,000 0 0 31,000 31,000 0 0.00%
Total expenditures 71,200 0 0 71,200 71,100 (100) (0.14%)
Revenues over (under) expenditures 7,800 7,800 4,900
Beginning fund balance 54,837 54,837 62,637
Ending fund balance 62,637 62,637 67,537
Page 4 of 20
P:\Finance\2019 Budget\Budget Worksheets\RCAs and Intros and PowerPoint Presentations\2018 09 11\budget summary as of 2018 09 11.xlsx
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA
2019 Budget
2018
As
Adopted
1st
Amendment
2nd
Amendment
As
Amended
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS - continued
#120 - CENTER PLACE OPERATING RESERVE FUND
Revenues
Investment Interest
Miscellaneous
Total revenues
Expenditures
Operations
Total expenditures
Revenues over (under) expenditures
Beginning fund balance
Ending fund balance
0
0
0
0
0
2019
Proposed
Budget
0
9/11/2018
Difference Between
2018 and 2019
OA
0 0.00%
O 0 0 0 0 0.00%
0
O 0 0 0 0 0.00%
0
O 0 0 0 0 0.00%
0
O 0 0 0 0 0.00%
0
300,000
300,000
#121 - SERVICE LEVEL STABILIZATION RESERVE FUND
Revenues
Investment Interest
Miscellaneous
0
0
0 0
300,000 300,000
300,000 300,000
O 0 0 0 0 0.00%
O 0 0 0 0 0.00%
Total revenues 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%
Expenditures
Operations
Total expenditures
Revenues over (under) expenditures
Beginning fund balance
Ending fund balance
0
O 0 0 0 0 0.00%
0
O 0 0 0 0 0.00%
0
5,500,000
5,500,000
0 0
5,500,000 5,500,000
5,500,000 5,500,000
#122 - WINTER WEATHER RESERVE FUND
Revenues
Investment Interest 3,500 0 0 3,500 5,000 1,500 42.86%
Transfers in - #001 0 490,000 0 490,000 0 (490,000) (100.00%)
Total revenues 3,500 490,000 0 493,500 5,000 (488,500) (98.99%)
Expenditures
Street maintenance expenditures 500,000 0 0 500,000 500,000 0 0.00%
Total expenditures 500,000 0 0 500,000 500,000 0 0.00%
Revenues over (under) expenditures (496,500) (6,500) (495,000)
Beginning fund balance 7,717 7,717 501,217
Ending fund balance (488,783) 1,217 6,217
Page 5 of 20
P:\Finance\2019 Budget\Budget Worksheets\RCAs and Intros and PowerPoint Presentations\2018 09 11\budget summary as of 2018 09 11.xlsx
DEBT SERVICE FUNDS
#204 - LTGO BOND DEBT SERVICE FUND
Revenues
Spokane Public Facilities District
Transfers in - #001
Transfers in - #301
Transfers in - #302
Total revenues
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA
2019 Budget
2018
As
Adopted
1st
Amendment
2nd
Amendment
As
Amended
414,050
399,350
82,000
82,000
0
0
0
0
2019
Proposed
Budget
9/11/2018
Difference Between
2018 and 2019
OA
O 414,050 432,150 18,100 4.37%
O 399,350 401,250 1,900 0.48%
O 82,000 82,475 475 0.58%
O 82,000 82,475 475 0.58%
977,400 0 0 977,400 998,350 20,950 2.14%
Expenditures
Debt Service Payments - CenterPlace 414,050 0 0 414,050 432,150 18,100 4.37%
Debt Service Payments - Roads 164,000 0 0 164,000 164,950 950 0.58%
Debt Service Payments - City Hall 399,350 0 0 399,350 401,250 1,900 0.48%
Total expenditures 977,400 0 0 977,400 998,350 20,950 2.14%
Revenues over (under) expenditures 0 0 0
Beginning fund balance 0 0 0
Ending fund balance 0 0 0
Page 6 of 20
P:\Finance\2019 Budget\Budget Worksheets\RCAs and Intros and PowerPoint Presentations\2018 09 11\budget summary as of 2018 09 11.xlsx
CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS
#301 - REET 1 CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND
Revenues
REET 1 - Taxes
Investment Interest
Total revenues
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA
2019 Budget
2018
As
Adopted
1st
Amendment
2nd
Amendment
As
Amended
2019
Proposed
Budget
9/11/2018
Difference Between
2018 and 2019
OA
800,000 0 700,000 1,500,000 1,000,000 (500,000) (33.33%)
7,500 0 0 7,500 22,000 14,500 193.33%
807,500 0 700,000 1,507,500 1,022,000 (485,500) (32.21%)
Expenditures
Transfers out - #204 82,000 0 0 82,000 82,475 475 0.58%
Transfers out - #303 1,048,852 0 0 1,048,852 504,172 (544,680) (51.93%)
Transfers out - #311 (pavement preservation) 685,329 0 0 685,329 734,300 48,971 7.15%
Transfers out - #314 (Barker Grade Separation) 0 0 463,836 463,836 36,111 (427,725) (92.21%)
Total expenditures 1,816,181 0 463,836 2,280,017 1,357,058 (922,959) (40.48%)
Revenues over (under) expenditures (1,008,681) (772,517) (335,058)
Beginning fund balance 2,125,374 2,125,374 1,352,857
Ending fund balance 1,116,693 1,352,857 1,017,799
#302 - REET 2 CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND
Revenues
REET 2 - Taxes
Investment Interest
800,000 0 700,000 1,500,000 1,000,000 (500,000) (33.33%)
8,000 0 0 8,000 25,000 17,000 212.50%
Total revenues 808,000 0 700,000 1,508,000 1,025,000 (483,000) (32.03%)
Expenditures
Transfers out - #204 82,000 0 0 82,000 82,475 475 0.58%
Transfers out - #303 1,003,544 0 95,890 1,099,434 167,434 (932,000) (84.77%)
Transfers out - #311 (pavement preservation) 685,329 0 0 685,329 734,300 48,971 7.15%
Total expenditures 1,770,873 0 95,890 1,866,763 984,209 (882,554) (47.28%)
Revenues over (under) expenditures (962,873) (358,763) 40,791
Beginning fund balance 3,008,424 3,008,424 2,649,661
Ending fund balance 2,045,551 2,649,661 2,690,452
Page 7 of 20
P:\Finance\2019 Budget\Budget Worksheets\RCAs and Intros and PowerPoint Presentations\2018 09 11\budget summary as of 2018 09 11.xlsx
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA
2019 Budget
2018
As
Adopted
1st
Amendment
2nd
Amendment
As
Amended
CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS - continued
#303 - STREET CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND
Revenues
Grant Proceeds 8,919,182
Developer 65,212
Transfers in -#301 1,048,852
Transfers in -#302 1,003,544
Transfers in - #312 - Euclid Ave - Flora to Barker 5,000
Transfers in - #312 - 8th & Carnahan Intersectio, 0
Transfers in - #312 - Indiana bus stops & crosses 110,000
Transfers in - #312 - Barker Corridor 0
Total revenues
2019
Proposed
Budget
9/11/2018
Difference Between
2018 and 2019
OA
0 (938,037) 7,981,145 4,208,681 (3,772,464) (47.27%)
0 (32,180) 33,032 35,700 2,668 8.08%
O 0 1,048,852 504,172 (544,680) (51.93%)
O 95,890 1,099,434 167,434 (932,000) (84.77%)
O 410,839 415,839 5,000 (410,839) (98.80%)
O 425,000 425,000 45,000 (380,000) (89.41%)
O (110,000) 0 0 0 0.00%
O 148,488 148,488 267,000 118,512 79.81%
11,151,790 0 0 11,151,790 5,232,987 (5,918,803) (53.07%)
Expenditures
123 Mission Ave. - Flora to Barker 3,625,716 0 136,412 3,762,128 5,000 (3,757,128) (99.87%)
141 Sullivan & Euclid PCC (PE & RW) 0 0 25,000 25,000 0 (25,000) (100.00%)
142 Broadway @ Argonne/Mullan PCC intersection 2,250,000 0 91,799 2,341,799 12,500 (2,329,299) (99.47%)
166 Pines Rd (SR27) & Grace Ave. Intersect Safety 402,710 0 92,290 495,000 5,000 (490,000) (98.99%)
201 ITS Infill Project Phase 1 378,172 0 58,828 437,000 5,000 (432,000) (98.86%)
205 Sprague/Barker Intersection Improvement 35,700 0 0 35,700 35,700 0 0.00%
221 McDonald Rd Diet (16th to Mission) 1,000 0 0 1,000 0 (1,000) (100.00%)
222 Citywide Reflective Signal Backplates 17,000 0 25,645 42,645 0 (42,645) (100.00%)
239 Bowdish Sidewalk - 8th to 12th 5,000 0 0 5,000 0 (5,000) (100.00%)
247 8th & Carnahan Intersection Improvements 0 0 425,000 425,000 45,000 (380,000) (89.41%)
249 Sullivan/Wellesley Intersection 268,000 0 0 268,000 1,167,287 899,287 335.55%
250 9th Ave. Sidewalk 2,000 0 0 2,000 0 (2,000) (100.00%)
251 Euclid Ave. - Flora to Barker 5,000 0 414,359 419,359 5,000 (414,359) (98.81%)
258 32nd Ave Sidewalk - SR27 to Evergreen 407,870 0 0 407,870 5,000 (402,870) (98.77%)
259 N. Sullivan Corridor ITS Project 808,723 0 (723,723) 85,000 730,000 645,000 758.82%
263 Citywide Signal Backplates 24,526 0 100,193 124,719 0 (124,719) (100.00%)
264 8th Ave Sidewalk 458,958 0 0 458,958 0 (458,958) (100.00%)
265 Wellesley Sidewalk Project 647,665 0 (609,665) 38,000 382,000 344,000 905.26%
267 Mission Ave Sidewalk 60,250 0 0 60,250 420,000 359,750 597.10%
273 Barker/I-90 Interchange 0 0 500,000 500,000 500,000 0 0.00%
275 Barker Rd Widening - River to Euclid 0 0 88,000 88,000 132,000 44,000 50.00%
276 Barker Rd Widening - Euclid to Garland 0 0 54,000 54,000 81,000 27,000 50.00%
277 Barker Rd Widening - Garland to Trent 0 0 36,000 36,000 54,000 18,000 50.00%
278 Wilbur Rd Sidewalk - Boone to Broadway 0 0 20,000 20,000 354,500 334,500 1672.50%
279 Knox Ave Sidewalk - Hutchinson to Sargent 0 0 20,000 20,000 294,000 274,000 1370.00%
Barker Road Widening 106,500 0 (106,500) 0 0 0 0.00%
Coleman Sidewalk 25,000 0 (25,000) 0 0 0 0.00%
Argonne Reconstruction - Indiana to Montgom 512,000 0 (512,000) 0 0 0 0.00%
Indiana bus stops & crosswalks 110,000 0 (110,000) 0 0 0 0.00%
Contingency 1,000,000 0 (638) 999,362 1,000,000 638 0.06%
Total expenditures 11,151,790 0 0 11,151,790 5,232,987 (5,918,803) (53.07%)
Revenues over (under) expenditures 0 0 0
Beginning fund balance 66,692 66,692 66,692
Ending fund balance 66,692 66,692 66,692
Note: Work performed for pavement preservation projects out of the Street Capital Projects Fund is for items such as sidewalk upgrades that the
were bid with the pavement preservation work.
Page 8 of 20
P:\Finance\2019 Budget\Budget Worksheets\RCAs and Intros and PowerPoint Presentations\2018 09 11\budget summary as of 2018 09 11.xlsx
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA
2019 Budget
2018
As
Adopted
1st
Amendment
2nd
Amendment
As
Amended
CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS - continued
2019
Proposed
Budget
9/11/2018
Difference Between
2018 and 2019
OA
#309 - PARK CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND
Revenues
Grant Proceeds 1,693,200 0 29,725 1,722,925 572,308 (1,150,617) (66.78%)
Transfers in - #001 560,000 0 0 560,000 1,320,000 760,000 135.71%
Transfers in - #103 (Appleway Trail - Sullivan to Cori 0 50,000 0 50,000 0 (50,000) (100.00%)
Transfers in -#312 324,100 0 0 324,100 14,788 (309,312) (95.44%)
Investment Interest 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%
Total revenues
2,577,300 50,000 29,725 2,657,025 1,907,096 (749,929) (28.22%)
Expenditures
237 Appleway Trail (Sullivan to Corbin) 1,853,300 233,000 0 2,086,300 5,000 (2,081,300) (99.76%)
268 Appleway Trail (Evergreen to Sullivan) 164,000 0 0 164,000 72,500 (91,500) (55.79%)
270 CenterPlace outdoor venue - Phase 1 200,000 0 0 200,000 0 (200,000) (100.00%)
271 Browns Park lighting and pathway 200,000 0 (176,800) 23,200 0 (23,200) (100.00%)
274 Park signs (Sullivan, Park Rd, Balfour) 24,000 0 0 24,000 0 (24,000) (100.00%)
280 Appleway Trail Amenities (Univ- Pines) 0 0 29,725 29,725 509,595 479,870 1614.37%
282 Browns Park volleyball courts 0 0 176,800 176,800 0 (176,800) (100.00%)
Browns Park restroom 0 0 0 0 160,000 160,000 0.00%
Browns Park improvements 0 0 0 0 1,000,000 1,000,000 0.00%
Swingsets 0 0 0 0 25,000 25,000 0.00%
Resurface Discovery Park 0 0 0 0 40,000 40,000 0.00%
Electrical Upgrade Mirabeau Point Park 0 0 7,700 7,700 0 (7,700) (100.00%)
Heart of the Valley Sculpture Placement 0 0 28,000 28,000 0 (28,000) (100.00%)
Total expenditures 2,441,300 233,000 65,425 2,739,725 1,812,095 (927,630) (33.86%)
Revenues over (under) expenditures 136,000 (82,700) 95,001
Beginning fund balance 126,202 126,202 43,502
Ending fund balance 262,202 43,502 138,503
#310 - CIVIC FACILITIES CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND
Revenues
Investment Interest
Total revenues
Expenditures
Miscellaneous
Transfers out - #001
Total expenditures
Revenues over (under) expenditures
Beginning fund balance
Ending fund balance
5,900
0
0 5,900 9,000 3,100 52.54%
5,900 0 0 5,900 9,000 3,100 52.54%
0
0
O 0 0 0 0 0.00%
O 0 0 0 0 0.00%
0
O 0 0 0 0 0.00%
5,900
843,688
849,588
5,900 9,000
843,688 849,588
849,588 858,588
Note: The fund balance in #310 includes $839,281.10 paid by the Library District for 2.82 acres at the Balfour Park site. If the District
does not succeed in getting a voted bond approved by October 2017 then the City may repurchase this land at the original sale
price of $839,285.10.
#311 - PAVEMENT PRESERVATION
Revenues
Transfers in - #001 962,700 0 0 962,700 972,300 9,600 1.00%
Transfers in - #101 67,342 0 0 67,342 0 (67,342) (100.00%)
Transfers in -#106 0 0 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,500,000 500,000 50.00%
Transfers in - #301 685,329 0 0 685,329 734,300 48,971 7.15%
Transfers in - #302 685,329 0 0 685,329 734,300 48,971 7.15%
Grant Proceeds 2,572,500 0 (1,000,000) 1,572,500 1,820,000 247,500 15.74%
Total revenues
Expenditures
Pavement preservation
Pre -project GeoTech
Total expenditures
4,973,200 0 0 4,973,200 5,760,900 787,700 15.84%
4,008,600 0 401,940 4,410,540 7,238,200 2,827,660 64.11%
50,000 0 0 50,000 50,000 0 0.00%
4,058,600 0 401,940 4,460,540 7,288,200 2,827,660 63.39%
Revenues over (under) expenditures 914,600 512,660 (1,527,300)
Beginning fund balance 3,362,503 3,362,503 3,875,163
Ending fund balance 4,277,103 3,875,163 2,347,863
Page 9 of 20
P:\Finance\2019 Budget\Budget Worksheets\RCAs and Intros and PowerPoint Presentations\2018 09 11\budget summary as of 2018 09 11.xlsx
CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS - continued
#312 - CAPITAL RESERVE FUND
Revenues
Transfers in - #001
Transfers in - #313
Investment Interest
Total revenues
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA
2019 Budget
2018
As
Adopted
1st
Amendment
2nd
Amendment
As
Amended
1,000,000 2,795,429
74,960 0
16,000 0
2019
Proposed
Budget
9/11/2018
Difference Between
2018 and 2019
OA
O 3,795,429 0 (3,795,429) (100.00%)
O 74,960 0 (74,960) (100.00%)
O 16,000 50,000 34,000 212.50%
1,090,960 2,795,429
O 3,886,389 50,000 (3,836,389) (98.71%)
Expenditures
City Hall Sculpture Siting 0 0 5,383 5,383 0 (5,383) (100.00%)
Transfers out #101 0 0 0 0 907,544 907,544 0.00%
Transfers out #303 (Euclid Ave - Flora to Barker) 5,000 0 410,839 415,839 5,000 (410,839) (98.80%)
Transfers out #303 (8th & Carnahan Intersection) 0 0 425,000 425,000 45,000 (380,000) (89.41%)
Transfers out #303 (Indiana bus stops & crosswalks; 110,000 0 (110,000) 0 0 0 0.00%
Transfers out #303 (Barker Road Corridor) 0 0 148,488 148,488 267,000 118,512 79.81%
Transfers out #309 (Appleway Trail - Sullivan -Corbin 301,900 0 0 301,900 5,000 (296,900) (98.34%)
Transfers out #309 (Appleway Trail - Evergreen-SuII 22,200 0 0 22,200 9,788 (12,412) (55.91%)
Transfers out #314 (Pines Rd Grade Separation) 0 0 4,809 4,809 0 (4,809) (100.00%)
Total expenditures 439,100 0 884,519 1,323,619 1,239,332 (84,287) (6.37%)
Revenues over (under) expenditures 651,860 2,562,770 (1,189,332)
Beginning fund balance 4,427,286 4,427,286 6,990,056
Ending fund balance 5,079,146 6,990,056 5,800,724
#313 - CITY HALL CONSTRUCTION FUND
Revenues
Investment Interest
0
0 0 0 0 0 0.00%
Total revenues 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%
Expenditures
Capital Outlay - City Hall 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%
Transfers out - #312 74,960 0 0 74,960 0 (74,960) (100.00%)
Total expenditures 74,960 0 0 74,960 0 (74,960) (100.00%)
Revenues over (under) expenditures (74,960) (74,960) 0
Beginning fund balance 101,076 101,076 26,116
Ending fund balance 26,116 26,116 26,116
#314 - RAILROAD GRADE SEPARATION PROJECTS FUND
Revenues
Grant Proceeds 1,919,921 0 (254,980) 1,664,941 467,369 (1,197,572) (71.93%)
Transfers in #001 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%
Transfers in #301 0 0 463,836 463,836 36,111 (427,725) (92.21%)
Transfers in #312 0 0 4,809 4,809 0 (4,809) (100.00%)
Total revenues 1,919,921 0 213,665 2,133,586 503,480 (1,630,106) (76.40%)
Expenditures
143 Barker BNSF Grade Separation 1,919,921 0 200,856 2,120,777 503,480 (1,617,297) (76.26%)
223 Pines Rd Underpass 1,000,000 0 77,540 1,077,540 0 (1,077,540) (100.00%)
Total expenditures 2,919,921 0 278,396 3,198,317 503,480 (2,694,837) (84.26%)
Revenues over (under) expenditures (1,000,000) (1,064,731) 0
Beginning fund balance 1,068,803 1,068,803 4,072
Ending fund balance 68,803 4,072 4,072
Page 10 of 20
P:\Finance\2019 Budget\Budget Worksheets\RCAs and Intros and PowerPoint Presentations\2018 09 11\budget summary as of 2018 09 11.xlsx
ENTERPRISE FUNDS
#402 - STORMWATER FUND
RECURRING ACTIVITY
Revenues
Stormwater Management Fees
Investment Interest
Miscellaneous
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA
2019 Budget
2018
As
Adopted
1st
Amendment
2nd
Amendment
As
Amended
2019
Proposed
Budget
9/11/2018
Difference Between
2018 and 2019
OA
1,870,000 0 0 1,870,000 1,890,000 20,000 1.07%
7,500 0 0 7,500 20,000 12,500 166.67%
0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%
Total Recurring Revenues 1,877,500 0 0 1,877,500 1,910,000 32,500 1.73%
Expenditures
Wages / Benefits / Payroll Taxes 557,157 0 0 557,157 494,273 (62,884) (11.29%)
Supplies 14,800 0 0 14,800 10,700 (4,100) (27.70%)
Services & Charges 1,140,982 0 228 1,141,210 1,182,109 40,899 3.58%
Intergovernmental Payments 35,000 0 0 35,000 37,500 2,500 7.14%
Vehicle rentals - #501 12,750 0 0 12,750 12,750 0 0.00%
Transfers out - #001 13,400 0 0 13,400 0 (13,400) (100.00%)
Total Recurring Expenditures 1,774,089 0 228 1,774,317 1,737,332 (36,985) (2.08%)
Recurring Revenues Over (Under)
Recurring Expenditures 103,411 0 (228) 103,183 172,668
NONRECURRING ACTIVITY
Revenues
Grant Proceeds 65,000 0 0 65,000 106,000 41,000 63.08%
Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%
Total Nonrecurring Revenues 65,000 0 0 65,000 106,000 41,000 63.08%
Expenditures
Capital - various projects 450,000 0 0 450,000 450,000 0 0.00%
Effectiveness study 15,000 0 0 15,000 10,000 (5,000) (33.33%)
Watershed studies 60,000 0 0 60,000 100,000 40,000 66.67%
Total Nonrecurring Expenditures 525,000 0 0 525,000 560,000 35,000 6.67%
Nonrecurring Revenues Over (Under)
Nonrecurring Expenditures (460,000) 0 0 (460,000) (454,000)
Excess (Deficit) of Total Revenues
Over (Under) Total Expenditures (356,589) 0 (228) (356,817) (281,332)
Beginning working capital 1,973,424 1,973,424 1,616,607
Ending working capital 1,616,835 1,616,607 1,335,275
#403 - AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA
Revenues
Spokane County 460,000 0 0 460,000 460,000 0 0.00%
Grant Proceeds 0 0 445,955 445,955 317,200 (128,755) (28.87%)
Investment Interest 0 0 0 0 10,000 10,000 0.00%
Total revenues 460,000 0 445,955 905,955 787,200 (118,755) (13.11%)
Expenditures
Capital - various projects 400,000 0 248,780 648,780 832,600 183,820 28.33%
Total expenditures 400,000 0 248,780 648,780 832,600 183,820 28.33%
Revenues over (under) expenditures 60,000 257,175 (45,400)
Beginning working capital 1,413,073 1,413,073 1,670,248
Ending working capital 1,473,073 1,670,248 1,624,848
Page 11 of 20
P:\Finance\2019 Budget\Budget Worksheets\RCAs and Intros and PowerPoint Presentations\2018 09 11\budget summary as of 2018 09 11.xlsx
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA
2019 Budget
2018
As
Adopted
1st
Amendment
2nd
Amendment
As
Amended
INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS
#501 - ER&R FUND
Revenues
Vehicle rentals - #001 30,000
Vehicle rentals - #101 21,250
Vehicle rentals - #101 (plow replace.) 77,929
Vehicle rentals - #402 12,750
Transfers in - #001 (CenterPlace kitchen reserve) 36,600
Investment Interest 4,000
Total revenues
0
0
0
0
0
0
2019
Proposed
Budget
9/11/2018
Difference Between
2018 and 2019
OA
O 30,000 30,000 0 0.00%
O 21,250 21,250 0 0.00%
O 77,929 77,929 0 0.00%
O 12,750 12,750 0 0.00%
O 36,600 36,600 0 0.00%
O 4,000 9,500 5,500 137.50%
182,529 0 0 182,529 188,029 5,500 3.01%
Expenditures
Vehicle Replacement 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%
Snow Plow Replacement 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%
Snow Plow Blades 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%
Small tools & minor equipment 20,000 0 0 20,000 20,000 0 0.00%
Total expenditures 20,000 0 0 20,000 20,000 0 0.00%
Revenues over (under) expenditures 162,529 162,529 168,029
Beginning working capital 1,096,283 1,096,283 1,258,812
Ending working capital 1,258,812 1,258,812 1,426,841
#502 - RISK MANAGEMENT FUND
Revenues
Investment Interest 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%
Transfers in - #001 370,000 0 0 370,000 390,000 20,000 5.41 %
Total revenues
370,000 0 0 370,000 390,000 20,000 5.41%
Expenditures
Auto & Property Insurance 370,000 0 0 370,000 390,000 20,000 5.41%
Unemployment Claims 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%
Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%
Total expenditures 370,000 0 0 370,000 390,000 20,000 5.41%
Revenues over (under) expenditures 0 0 0
Beginning fund balance 244,261 244,261 244,261
Ending fund balance 244,261 244,261 244,261
TOTAL OF ALL FUNDS
Total of Revenues for all Funds
Total of Expenditures for all Funds
Total grant revenues (included in total
revenues)
Total Capital expenditures (included in
total expenditures)
75,762,925 3,335,429 3,339,345 82,437,699 73,060,908
77,365,593 3,775,429 3,449,734 84,590,756 73,853,656
15,169,803
21,644,311
0 (1,717,337) 13,452,466 7,491,558
283,000 999,924 22,927,235 16,207,362
Page 12 of 20
P:\Finance\2019 Budget\Budget Worksheets\RCAs and Intros and PowerPoint Presentations\2018 09 11\budget summary as of 2018 09 11.xlsx
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA
2019 Budget
General Fund
RECURRING ACTIVITY
Revenues
Property Tax
Sales Tax
Sales Tax - Public Safety
Sales Tax - Criminal Justice
Gambling Tax and Leasehold Excise Tax
Franchise Fees/Business Registration
State Shared Revenues
Fines and Forfeitures/Public Safety
Community and Public Works
Recreation Program Revenues
Miscellaneous Department Revenue
Miscellaneous & Investment Interest
Transfers in - #101 (street admin)
Transfers in - #105 (h/m tax -CP advertising)
Transfers in - #402 (storm admin)
Total Recurring Revenues
2018
Amended
Budget
2019
as of
$
as
6/12/2018
Change
revised
9/11/2018
Difference Between
2018 and 2019
11,796,100 11,954,400 0 11,954,400 158,300 1.34%
20,881,900 22,917,000 0 22,917,000 2,035,100 9.75%
967,800 1,081,900 0 1,081,900 114,100 11.79%
1,738,000 1,944,000 0 1,944,000 206,000 11.85%
381,000 387,000 0 387,000 6,000 1.57%
1,210,000 1,224,000 0 1,224,000 14,000 1.16%
2,109,600 1,858,800 51,000 1,909,800 (199,800) (9.47%)
1,319,900 1,078,500 0 1,078,500 (241,400) (18.29%)
1,684,100 1,882,300 0 1,882,300 198,200 11.77%
633,300 628,800 0 628,800 (4,500) (0.71%)
1,000 1,000 0 1,000 0 0.00%
201,800 358,200 0 358,200 156,400 77.50%
39,700 0 0 0 (39,700) (100.00%)
30,000 30,000 0 30,000 0 0.00%
13,400 13,400 (13,400) 0 (13,400) (100.00%)
43,007,600 45,359,300 37,600 45,396,900 2,389,300 5.56%
Expenditures
City Council 550,087 523,717 21,186 544,903 (5,184) (0.94%)
City Manager 956,700 983,965 (39,930) 944,035 (12,665) (1.32%)
City Attorney 602,207 610,808 (259) 610,549 8,342 1.39%
Public Safety 25,464,251 25,777,304 150,000 25,927,304 463,053 1.82%
Deputy City Manager 450,891 266,589 455 267,044 (183,847) (40.77%)
Finance / IT 1,339,974 1,393,637 8,860 1,402,497 62,523 4.67%
Human Resources 280,415 285,466 11,955 297,421 17,006 6.06%
City Hall Operations and Maintenance 306,271 290,088 455 290,543 (15,728) (5.14%)
Community & Public Works - Engineering 1,629,293 1,715,027 101,114 1,816,141 186,848 11.47% Net
Community & Public Works - Economic Dev 970,870 1,047,820 (29,048) 1,018,772 47,902 4.93% ference
Community & Public Works - Building & Plannin 2,209,787 2,245,502 3,196 2,248,698 38,911 1.76% $273,661
Parks & Rec - Administration 301,311 332,207 3,751 335,958 34,647 11.50%
Parks & Rec - Maintenance 893,700 893,500 0 893,500 (200) (0.02%)
Parks & Rec - Recreation 260,802 241,762 11,860 253,622 (7,180) (2.75%)_ Net
Parks & Rec - Aquatics 492,900 491,153 0 491,153 (1,747) (0.35%) difference
Parks & Rec - Senior Center 98,229 101,215 0 101,215 2,986 3.04% $67,224
Parks & Rec - CenterPlace 910,696 949,149 265 949,414 38,718 4.25%
General Government 1,261,610 1,290,250 42,400 1,332,650 71,040 5.63%
Transfers out - #204 (2016 LTGO debt service) 399,350 401,250 0 401,250 1,900 0.48%
Transfers out - #309 (park capital projects) 160,000 160,000 0 160,000 0 0.00%
Transfers out - #311 (pavement preservation) 962,700 972,300 0 972,300 9,600 1.00%
Transfers out - #501 (CenterPlace kitchen reserve) 36,600 36,600 0 36,600 0 0.00%
Transfers out - #502 (insurance premium) 370,000 390,000 0 390,000 20,000 5.41 %
Total Recurring Expenditures 40,908,644 41,399,309 286,260 41,685,569 776,925 1.90%
Recurring Revenues Over (Under)
Recurring Expenditures 2,098,956 3,959,991 (248,660) 3,711,331
Page 13 of 20
P:\Finance\2019 Budget\Budget Worksheets\RCAs and Intros and PowerPoint Presentations\2018 09 11\budget summary as of 2018 09 11.xlsx
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA
2019 Budget
General Fund
NONRECURRING ACTIVITY
Revenues
Transfers in - #106 (solid waste repayment)
Miscellaneous (donation)
Total Nonrecurring Revenues
2018
Amended
Budget
40,425
0
2019
as of
$
as
6/12/2018
Change
revised
40,425
0
(3) 40,422
0
0
40,425 40,425 (3) 40,422
9/11/2018
Difference Between
2018 and 2019
(3) (0.01%)
0 0.00%
(3) (0.01%)
Expenditures
General Government - IT capital replacements 115,000 107,000 0 107,000 (8,000) (6.96%)
City Attorney (part-time attorney furniture) 4,809 0 0 0 (4,809) (100.00%)
Public Safety (full facility generator) 100,000 0 0 0 (100,000) (100.00%)
Public Safety (carpet & workstation replacement) 0 0 50,000 50,000 50,000 0.00%
Deputy City Manager (Q -Alert software) 11,700 0 0 0 (11,700) (100.00%)
Community & Econ Dev (retail recruitment) 50,000 0 25,000 25,000 (25,000) (50.00%)
Parks & Rec (Flooring in Great Room & Dining Roos 50,000 0 0 0 (50,000) (100.00%)
Parks & Rec (CP reseal two restroom floors) 3,000 0 0 0 (3,000) (100.00%)
Generator for City Hall 200,000 0 0 0 (200,000) (100.00%)
Transfers out - #309 (CP outdoor venue Phase 1) 200,000 0 0 0 (200,000) (100.00%)
Transfers out - #309 (Browns Park lighting & path) 200,000 0 0 0 (200,000) (100.00%)
Transfers out - #309 (Browns Park restroom) 0 0 160,000 160,000 160,000 0.00%
Transfers out - #309 (Browns Park other) 0 0 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 0.00%
Transfers out - #122 (replenish reserve) 490,000 0 0 0 (490,000) (100.00%)
Transfers out - #312 (misc capital projects) 1,000,000 0 0 0 (1,000,000) (100.00%)
Transfers out - #312 115 fund bal > 50%) 2,795,429 0 0 0 (2,795,429) (100.00%)
Total Nonrecurring Expenditures 5,219,938 107,000 1,235,000 1,342,000 (3,877,938) (74.29%)
Nonrecurring Revenues Over (Under)
Nonrecurring Expenditures
Excess (Deficit) of Total Revenues
Over (Under) Total Expenditures
Beginning unrestricted fund balance
Ending unrestricted fund balance
(5,179,513) (66,575)
(3,080,557) 3,893,416
33, 664, 222 30, 583, 665
30,583,665 34,477,081
Ending fund balance as a percent of recurring expenditures =
83.28%
(1,301,578)
2,409,753
30,583,665
32,993,418
79.15%
Recurring Expenditures
Public Safety
All other departments
25,464,251 25,777,304 150,000 25,927,304 1.82% 62.20%
15,444,393 15,622,005 136,260 15,758,265 2.03% 37.80%
40,908,644 41,399,309 286,260 41,685,569 1.90% 100.00%
Page 14 of 20
P:\Finance\2019 Budget\Budget Worksheets\RCAs and Intros and PowerPoint Presentations\2018 09 11\budget summary as of 2018
09 11.xlsx
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA
General Fund #001
2019 Budget Worksheets - Expenditure Changes from June 12 to August 21, 2018
Account
Number
Revenues
001.000.000.336.00.99
001.000.000.336.06.21
001.000.000.336.06.26
001.000.000.336.06.42
001.000.000.336.06.94
001.000.000.336.06.95
001.000.000.397.10.60
001.000.000.397.40.20
Expenditures
Council
001.011.000.511.60.42.03
001.011.000.511.60.43.10
City Manager
001.013.000.513.10.10.00
001.013.000.513.10.20.00
001.013.000.513.10.42.03
City Attorney
001.013.015.515.32.10.00
001.013.015.515.32.42.03
Public Safety
001.016.000.521.20.49.06
001.016.099.521.20.35.01
001.016.099.521.20.48.01
Deputy City Manager
001.018.013.513.10.42.03
Finance
001.018.014.514.23.10.00
001.018.014.514.23.20.00
001.018.014.514.23.42.03
001.018.014.514.23.43.01
001.018.014.514.23.49.04
Human Resources
001.018.016.518.10.41.17
001.018.016.518.10.42.03
001.018.016.518.10.49.10
Description
Streamline Mitigation of Sales Tax
MVET Criminal Justice - Population
Criminal Justice Special Programs
Marijuana Excise Tax Distribution
Liquor Board Excise Tax
Liquor Board Profits
Transfers in - #106
Transfers in - #402
Cell Phones - Smarsh
Travel/Mileage - Federal Lobby
Wages
Payroll Taxes and Benefits
Cell Phones - Smarsh
R
R
9/11/2018
Line -Item
Line -Item
Budget @
Increase
Budget @
6/12/2018
(Decrease)
8/21/2018
254,500
30,300
103,400
33,200
478,200
776,200
40,425
13,400
3,800
0
R 631,780
R 280,105
R 1,080
Wages R 345,064
Cell Phones - Smarsh & Phone Allowanc R
Miscellaneous Srvs/Contingency
Minor Equipment
Equipment Repair & Maintenance
Cell Phones - Smarsh
Wages
Payroll Taxes and Benefits
Cell Phones - Smarsh
Travel/Mileage
Registrations
Advertising
Cell Phones - Smarsh
Education Reimbursement
City Hall Operations & Maintenance
001.033.000.518.30.42.03 Cell Phones - Smarsh
500
R 500,000
N 0
N 0
R
1,020
R 935,223
R 427,964
R 600
R
5,000
R 9,700
R
R
R
2,000
0
0
R 0
Page 15 of 20
(50, 000)
1,300
1,000
78,900
14,200
5,600
(3)
(13, 400)
37,597
3,186
18,000
21,186
204,500
31,600
104,400
112,100
492,400
781,800
40,422
0
6,986
18,000
(24,096) 607,684
(16,744) 263,361
910 1,990
(39, 930)
(1,709) 343,355
1,450
(259)
150,000
40,000
10,000
200,000
455
455
3,900
840
1,820
200
2,100
8,860
1,500
455
10,000
11,955
1,950
650,000
40,000
10,000
1,475
939,123
428,804
2,420
5,200
11,800
3,500
455
10,000
455 455
455
P:\Finance\2019 Budget\Budget Worksheets\RCAs and Intros and PowerPoint Presentations\2018 09 11\budget summary as of 2018
09 11.xlsx
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA
General Fund #001
2019 Budget Worksheets - Expenditure Changes from June 12 to August 21, 2018
Account
Number
Description
Expenditures - continued
Community & Public Works -
001.040.041.543.10.10.00
001.040.041.543.10.20.00
001.040.041.543.10.42.03
001.040.041.543.10.49.02
Engineering
Wages
Payroll Taxes and Benefits
Cell Phones - Smarsh
Memberships/Professional Licenses
Community & Public Works - Economic Development
001.040.042.558.70.10.00 Wages
001.040.042.558.70.20.00
001.040.042.558.70.41.07
001.040.042.558.70.42.03
001.040.099.558.70.41.05
Payroll Taxes and Benefits
Contracted Economic Development
Cell Phones - Smarsh
Retail Recruitment Contract
Community & Public Works - Building and Planning
001.040.043.558.50.10.00
001.040.043.558.50.20.00
001.040.043.558.50.42.03
Wages
Payroll Taxes and Benefits
Cell Phones - Smarsh
Parks & Recreation - Administration
001.076.000.576.80.10.00 Wages
001.076.000.576.80.20.00 Payroll Taxes and Benefits
001.076.000.576.80.42.03 Cell Phones - Smarsh
Parks & Recreation - Recreation
001.076.301.571.20.10.01 Temp/Seasonal - Wages
001.076.301.571.20.20.01 Temp/Seasonal - PR Tax & Benefits
001.076.301.571.20.42.03 Cell Phones - Smarsh
001.076.301.571.20.49.06 Miscellaneous Services
Parks & Recreation - CenterPlace
001.076.305.575.50.10.01 Temp/Seasonal - Wages
001.076.305.575.50.20.01 Temp/Seasonal - PR Tax & Benefits
001.076.305.575.50.42.03 Cell Phones - Smarsh
General Government
001.090.000.513.10.41.05
001.090.000.514.23.41.01
001.090.000.550.00.41.05
001.090.000.518.90.44.03
001.090.000.553.70.44.03
001.090.000.597.30.00.90
001.090.000.597.30.00.90
9/11/2018
Line -Item
Line -Item
Budget @
Increase
Budget @
6/12/2018
(Decrease)
8/21/2018
R 682,305
R 301,146
R 5,483
R 2,100
R 489,664
R 203,631
R
40,000
R 540
N 0
R 986,232
R 468,520
R
5,800
R 195,939
R 60,219
R 0
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
Professional Services - Misc Studies R
Accounting & Auditing R
Outside Agencies - Social Svc & Econ DE R
Taxes & Assessments R
Spokane Regional Clean Air Agency R
Transfers out - #309 (Browns Pk restroom) N
Transfers out - #309 (Browns Pk impr.) N
67,653
9,393
200
21,900
85,450
10,242
900
200,000
90,000
200,000
0
139,000
0
0
66,522
33,637
455
500
101,114
(32, 994)
(14, 509)
18,000
455
25,000
(4,048)
2,256
485
455
3,196
2,712
584
455
3,751
3,210
1,195
455
7,000
11,860
(857)
667
455
265
45,000
5,000
(18, 000)
12,100
(1,700)
160,000
1,000,000
1,202,400
Total changes in General Fund expenditures 1,521,260
R = recurring
N = nonrecurring
Page 16 of 20
286,260
1,235,000
1,521,260
748,827
334,783
5,938
2,600
456,670
189,122
58,000
995
25,000
988,488
469,005
6,255
198,651
60,803
455
70,863
10,588
655
28,900
84,593
10,909
1,355
245,000
95,000
182,000
12,100
137,300
160,000
1,000,000
P:\Finance\2019 Budget\Budget Worksheets\RCAs and Intros and PowerPoint Presentations\2018 09 11\budget
summary as of 2018 09 11.xlsx
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA
2019 Budget
General Fund Department Changes from 2018 to 2019
City Council
Wages, Payroll Taxes & Benefits
Supplies
Services & Charges
Total
City Manager
Wages, Payroll Taxes & Benefits
Supplies
Services & Charges
Total
City Attorney
Wages, Payroll Taxes & Benefits
Supplies
Services & Charges
Total
Public Safety
Non -Departmental (Fines & Forfeits)
Wages/Payroll Taxes/Benefits
Supplies
Other Services and Charges
Intergovernmental Services
Total
Deputy City Manager
Wages, Payroll Taxes & Benefits
Supplies
Services & Charges
Total
Finance/IT
Wages, Payroll Taxes & Benefits
Supplies
Services & Charges
Total
Human Resources
Wages, Payroll Taxes & Benefits
Supplies
Services & Charges
Total
City Hall Operations & Maintenance
Wages, Payroll Taxes & Benefits
Supplies
Services & Charges
Total
2018
Amended
Budget
233,194
4,950
311,943
2019
Budget
208,417
4,950
331,536
550,087 544,903
877,105
4,300
75,295
871,845
4,300
67,890
956,700 944,035
506,481
1,951
93,775
521,744
2,351
86,454
602,207 610,549
579,750
3,000
25,500
296,715
24,559,286
25,464,251
358,493
2,000
90,398
589,150
12,000
25,750
748,266
24,552,138
Difference Between
2018 and 2019
Increase (Decrease)
0/0
(24,777) (10.63%)
0 0.00%
19,593 6.28%
(5,184) (0.94%)
(5,260) (0.60%)
0 0.00%
(7,405) (9.83%)
(12,665) (1.32%)
15,263 3.01%
400 20.50%
(7,321) (7.81%)
8,342
1.39%
9,400
9,000
250
451,551
(7,148)
1.62%
300.00%
0.98%
152.18%
(0.03%)
25,927,304 463,053
220,619
2,000
44,425
1.82%
(137,874) (38.46%)
0 0.00%
(45,973) (50.86%)
450,891 267,044 (183,847) (40.77%)
1,308,614 1,367,927
6,450 6,450
24,910 28,120
1,339,974 1,402,497
254,577
580
25,258
265,058
1,130
31,233
280,415 297,421
100,943
30,000
175,328
89,488
30,500
170,555
306,271 290,543
Page 17 of 20
59,313
0
3,210
4.53%
0.00%
12.89%
62,523
4.67%
10,481
550
5,975
4.12%
94.83%
23.66%
17,006
6.06%
(11,455) (11.35%)
500 1.67%
(4,773) (2.72%)
(15,728)
(5.14%)
(Continued to next page)
P:\Finance\2019 Budget\Budget Worksheets\RCAs and Intros and PowerPoint Presentations\2018 09 11\budget
summary as of 2018 09 11.xlsx
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA
2019 Budget
General Fund Department Changes from 2018 to 2019
(Continued from previous page)
2018
Amended
Budget
2019
Budget
Difference Between
2018 and 2019
Increase (Decrease)
0/0
Community & Public Works - Engineerinq
Wages, Payroll Taxes & Benefits 1,480,905 1,602,572 121,667 8.22%
Supplies 27,750 27,100 (650) (2.34%)
Services & Charges 120,638 186,469 65,831 54.57%
Page 18 of 20
P:\Finance\2019 Budget\Budget Worksheets\RCAs and Intros and PowerPoint Presentations\2018 09 11\budget
summary as of 2018 09 11.xlsx
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA
2019 Budget
General Fund Department Changes from 2018 to 2019
(Continued from previous page)
2018
Amended
Budget
2019
Budget
Difference Between
2018 and 2019
Increase (Decrease)
0/0
Parks & Rec- CenterPlace
Wages, Payroll Taxes & Benefits 503,499 534,355 30,856 6.13%
Supplies 73,524 70,774 (2,750) (3.74%)
Services & Charges 333,673 344,285 10,612 3.18%
Total 910,696 949,414 38,718 4.25%
General Government
Wages, Payroll Taxes & Benefits 0 0 0 0.00%
Supplies 104,450 86,350 (18,100) (17.33%)
Services & Charges 754,660 841,900 87,240 11.56%
Intergovernmental Services 332,500 339,400 6,900 2.08%
Capital outlays 70,000 65,000 (5,000) (7.14%)
Total 1,261,610 1,332,650 71,040 5.63%
Transfers out - #204 debt service 399,350 401,250 1,900 0.48%
Transfers out - #309 park capital pros 160,000 160,000 0 0.00%
Transfers out - #311
Pavement Preservation 962,700 972,300 9,600 1.00%
Transfers out - #501
CenterPlace Kitchen Reserve 36,600 36,600 0 0.00%
370,000 390,000 20,000 5.41%
40,908,644 41,685,569 776,925 1.90%
Transfers out - #502
Total recurring expenditures
Summary by Category
Wages, Payroll Taxes & Benefits 8,662,158 8,769,830 107,672 1.24%
Supplies 355,905 329,855 (26,050) (7.32%)
Services & Charges 4,400,395 5,055,046 654,651 14.88%
Transfers out - #204 399,350 401,250 1,900 0.48%
Transfers out - #309 160,000 160,000 0 0.00%
Transfers out - #311 - Pavement Presery 962,700 972,300 9,600 1.00%
Transfers out - #501 36,600 36,600 0 0.00%
Transfers out - #502 370,000 390,000 20,000 5.41
Non -Departmental (fines & forfeits) 579,750 589,150 9,400 1.62%
Intergovernmental Svc (public safety) 24,559,286 24,552,138 (7,148) (0.03%)
Intergovernmental Svc 352,500 364,400 11,900 3.38%
Capital outlay 70,000 65,000 (5,000) (7.14%)
40,908,644
41,685,569 776,925 1.90%
Page 19 of 20
P:\Finance\2019 Budget\Budget Worksheets\RCAs and Intros and PowerPoint Presentations\2018 09 11\budget summary as of 2018 09 11.xlsx
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA
Full Time Equivalent Employees
Adopted
2009 1 2010 1 2011 1 2012 1 2013 1 2014 1 2015 1 2016 1 2017 1 2018
Proposed
2019
Difference from
2018 to 2019
+ (-)
#001 - General Fund
City Manager / City Clerk 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 7 6.5 (0.500)
City Attorney 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3.5 3.5 0.000
Public Safety 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.12 0.120
Deputy City Manager 8 8 7 7 6 6 6 6 6 3 1 (2.000)
Finance 10 12 11 11 10.75 11.75 11.75 11.75 11.75 11.75 11.75 0.000
Human Resources 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 0.000
Public Works 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 7 7.375 7.375 7.375 6.375 0 0 0.000
City Hall Operations & Maintenance 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0.88 (0.120) (4)
CPW - Engineering 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.5 13.275 0.775 (6)(7)
CPW - Economic Development 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6.375 6 (0.375) (6)
CPW - Building and Planning 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 20 2.000 (5)
CED - Administration 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 1 0 0 0.000
CED - Economic Development 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.5 2.65 4 0 0 0.000
CED - Development Services 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 11 10 0 0 0.000
CED - Engineering 8 8 6 6 8 7 0 0 0 0 0 0.000
CED - Planning 9 9 8.5 8.5 8 8 0 0 0 0 0 0.000
CED - Building 14.75 14.75 12.75 12.75 11.5 12.5 14 14 15 0 0 0.000
Parks & Rec - Admin 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 0.000
Parks & Rec - Recreation 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0.000
Parks & Rec - Senior Cntr 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0.000
Parks & Rec - CenterPlace 7 7 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 0.000
Total General Fund 81.25 83.25 74.75 74.75 72.25 73.625 73.625 73.775 74.125 74.125 74.025 -0.100
#101 - Street Fund 5 5 5 4.5 5 5.375 5.725 5.725 5.725 5.725 7.725 2.000
#303 - Street Capital Project Fund 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 5 8.1 3.100
#402 - Stormwater Fund 4 4 4 4.5 4.5 4.75 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.4 3.9 (0.500)
Total FTEs 93.75 95.75 87.25 87.25 85.25 87.25 87.25 87.4 87.75 89.25 93.75 4.500
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
FTEs for 2017 reflect the reorganization that was effective in April 2017.
The original 2017 Budget had FTEs of 88.4.
FTEs for 2018 reflect the budget amendment approved on May 29, 2018.
Vacant Administrative Assistant position reduced to 50%.
The Maintenance Worker position was split part time with the Precinct and City Hall.
Two Office Assistant positions were moved from DCM to Building.
For the General Fund portion of the Planning Grants Engineer position (0.375 FTE), position was moved from
Economic Development to Engineering.
Supplemental budget request for 5 FTEs, including one Senior Engineer, one Assistant Engineer,
and three Construction Inspectors.
Page 20 of 20
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: September 11, 2018 Department Director Approval:
Check all that apply: ® consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Approval of the Fallowing Vouchers:
VOUCHER
08/22/2018
08/28/2018
08/28/2018
08/28/2018
08/30/2018
08/30/2018
09/05/2018
09/05/2018
LIST VOUCHER NUMBERS
45380-45437
45438-45461
45462-45478
7916-7944
45479-45514
45515-45519
7945-7969
45520-45536; 5040606
GRA
TOTAL AMOUNT
$232,049.58
$190,280.77
$74,328.15
$3,977.00
$266,062.93
$5,004.17
$3,063.20
$1,964,816.43
ND TOTAL: $2,739,582.23
#001 - General Fund
001.011.000.511.
001.013.000.513.
001.013.015.515.
001.016.000.
001.018.013.513.
001.018.014.514.
001.018.016.518.
001.032.000.
001.058.050.558.
001.058.051.558.
001.058.055.558.
001.058.056.558.
001.058.057.558
001.076.000.576.
001.076.300.576.
001.076.301.571.
001.076.3 02.576.
001.076.304.575.
001.076.305.571.
001.090.000.511.
001.090.000.514.
001.090.000.517.
001.090.000.518.
001.090.000.519.
001.090.000.540.
001.090.000.550.
001.090.000.560.
001.090.000.594.
001.090.000.595.
Explanation of Fund Numbers found
City Council
City Manager
Legal
Public Safety
Deputy City Manager
Finance
Human Resources
Public Works
CED - Administration
CED -- Economic Development
CED — Development Services -Engineering
CED — Development Services -Planning
CED — Building
Parks & Rec—Administration
Parks & Rec-Maintenance
Parks & Rec-Recreation
Parks & Rec- Aquatics
Parks & Rec- Senior Center
Parks & Rec-CenterPlace
General Gov't- Council related
General Gov't -Finance related
General Gov't -Employee supply
General Gov't- Centralized Services
General Gov't -Other Services
General Gov't -Transportation
General Gov't -Natural & Economic
General Gov't -Social Services
General Gov't -Capital Outlay
General Gov't -Pavement Preservation
on Voucher Lists
Other Funds
101 — Street Fund
103 — Paths & Trails
105 — Hotel/Motel Tax
106 — Solid Waste
120 - CcnterPlace Operating Reserve
121— Service Level Stabilization Reserve
122 — Winter Weather Reserve
204 — Debt Service
301 —REET l Capital Projects
302 — REET 2 Capital Projects
303 — Street Capital Projects
309 — Parks Capital Grants
310 — Civic Bldg Capital Projects
311 — Pavement Preservation
312 — Capital Reserve
314 — Railroad Grade Separation Projects
402 — Stormwater Management
403 — Aquifer Protection Area
501 — Equipment Rental & Replacement
502 — Risk Management
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to approve attached list of claim vouchers.
[Approved as part of the Consent Agenda, or may be removed and discussed separately.]
STAFF CONTACT: Chelsie Taylor, Finance Director
ATTACHMENTS: Voucher Lists
vchlist
08/22/2018 11:24: 50AM
Voucher List
Spokane Valley
Page: 1
Bank code : apbank
Voucher
Date Vendor
Invoice
45380 8/22/2018 000958 AAA SWEEPING LLC
45381 8/22/2018 004278 ARCHITECTS WEST INC
45382 8/22/2018 003122 CALHOUN, MARK
45383 8/22/2018 001122 CAMERON-REILLY LLC
45384 8/22/2018 002562 CD'A METALS
45385 8/22/2018 006443 CRAIG GOODWIN PHOTOGRAPHY
45386 8/22/2018 000734 DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION
45387 8/22/2018 002920 DIRECTV INC
45388 8/22/2018 006869 DRB COMPANY LLC
45389 8/22/2018 000999 EASTERN WAATTORNEY SVC INC
45390 8/22/2018 002157 ELJAY OIL COMPANY
62060
62061
9765
EXPENSES
PAY APP 7
366943
367141
367283
Fund/Dept
402.402.000.531
402.402-000.531
001.090.000.513
001.013.000.513
303.303.141.595
101.000.000.542
101.000.000.542
101.042.000.542
261 001.040.042.558
R E -313 -ATB 8 0716057 101.042.000.542
R E-313-ATB980716048 101.042.000.542
34801083505
BLD -2018-1401
116000
116001
116002
101 042.000.543
001.040.043.322
001.013.015.515
001.013.015.515
001.013.015.515
4277830 101.042, 000.542
Description/Account
Amount
STORM DRAIN CLEANING
STREET SWEEPING
Total :
PROFESSIONAL SVCS - CITY HALL
Total :
EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT
Total :
CIP 0141 - SULLIVAN-EUCLID PCC
Total :
SUPPLIES: MAINTENANCE SHOP
SUPPLIES: MAINTENANCE SHOP
SUPPLIES: MAINTENANCE SHOP
Total :
PHOTOGRAPHY SERVICES
Total :
REIMBURSE ROADWAY MAINT
REIMBURSE TRAFFIC SVCS
Total :
CABLE SERVICE FOR MAINTENAN
Total :
32,379.42
17,871.41
50,250.83
1,562.34
1,562.34
97.42
97.42
111.00
111.00
46.22
70.98
27.74
144.94
1,937.50
1,937.50
9,136.43
4,169.60
13,306.03
75.24
75.24
REFUND PERMIT BLDG FEE & PLA 12,828.42
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Total : 12,828.42
Total :
60.00
80.00
80.00
220.00
FUEL FOR MAINTENANCE SHOP 621.45
Page: 1
vchlist
08/22/2018 11: 24: 50AM
Voucher List
Spokane Valley
Page: 2
Bank code : apbank
Voucher
Date Vendor
Invoice
45390 8/22/2018 002157 002157 ELJAY OIL COMPANY
45391 8/22/2018 003274 EXCHANGE PUBLISHING LLC
45392 8/22/2018 001447 FREE PRESS PUBLISHING INC
501029
501030
501031
501032
48881
48894
48896
48897
48912
48915
48916
48917
45393 8/22/2018 002975 FREEDOM SALES AND SUPPLY LLC 2018568
45394 8/22/2018 005474 FREIGHTLINER NORTHWEST
45395 8/22/2018 000007 GRANGER
45396 8/22/2018 000321 GREATER SPOKANE 1NC
45397 8/22/2018 000002 H & H BUSINESS SYSTEMS INC.
(Continued)
PC001421566:01
PC001422281:01
9851841982
9865386487
9865386495
9872071163
118230
AR81170
AR81171
AR81172
AR81173
Fund/Dept
001.013.015.515
001.013.000.513
001.013.000.513
001.040.043.558
001.011.000.511
001.040.043.558
001.013.000.513
001.040.043.558
001.013.015.515
001.013.000.513
001.013.000.513
001.040.043.558
001.090.000.519
101.000.000.542
101.000.000.542
101.000.000.542
101.000.000.542
101.042.000.542
001.040.041.543
001.040.042.558
001.013.000.513
001.018.014.514
001.018.016.518
001.013.015.515
Description/Account
Amount
LEGAL PUBLICATION
LEGAL PUBLICATION
LEGAL PUBLICATION
LEGAL PUBLICATION
ADVERTISING
LEGAL PUBLICATION
LEGAL PUBLICATION
LEGAL PUBLICATION
LEGAL PUBLICATION
LEGAL PUBLICATION
LEGAL PUBLICATION
LEGAL PUBLICATION
OFFICE SUPPLIES
Total :
Total :
Total :
Total :
SMALL TOOLS/MINOR EQUIP - MAI
SMALL TOOLS/MINOR EQUIP - MAI
Total :
SMALL TOOLS/MINOR EQUIPMENT
SMALL TOOLS/MINOR EQUIPMENT
SMALL TOOLS/MINOR EQUIPMEN1
SMALL TOOLS/MINOR EQUIPMEN1
Total :
BASE INVESTMENT/PUBLIC INVES
Total :
COPIER COSTS - CITY COUNCILIC
COPIER COSTS - IT
COPIER COSTS - HR
COPIER COSTS - LEGAL
621.45
35.25
35.55
41.87
64.78
177.45
148.80
177.60
25.00
88.40
78.40
41.65
47.60
76.50
683.95
43.50
43.50
59.86
-23.57
36.29
20.18
58.81
123.48
46.77
249.24
3,583.34
3,583.34
421.52
30.52
91.35
358.72
Page: 2
vchlist
08/22/2018 11:24:50AM
Voucher List
Spokane Valley
Page: 3
Bank code : apbank
Voucher
Date Vendor
Invoice
45397 8/22/2018 000002 H & H BUSINESS SYSTEMS INC.
45398 8/22/2018 006864 HERITAGE BANK
45399 8/22/2018 002901 IMSA NW CHAPTER
45400 8/22/2018 000864 JUB ENGINEERS INC.
45401 8/22/2018 002466 KENWORTH SALES COMPANY
45402 8/22/2018 006645 LA CONSULTING INC
45403 8/22/2018 001944 LANCER LTD
45404 8/22/2018 003251 MDI MARKETING
45405 8/22/2018 002259 MENKE JACKSON BEYER LLP
45406 8/22/2018 000157 MOAT, BRIAN
(Continued)
AR81174
AR81540
2017 RETAINAGE
218048
101769
0118736
S P 0 802932571
S P O R02936233
S P O R02937075
SPOR02954465
SPOR02960324
SPOR02961591
0014561
0470456
11145
462
EXPENSES
Fund/Dept
001.013.000.513
001.040.043.558
001.223.40.00
001.076.305.575
101.042.000.542
101.042.000.542
101.000.000.542
101.000.000.542
101.000.000.542
101.000.000.542
101.000.000.542
101.000.000.542
402.402.000.531
001.040.043.558
001.040.042,558
001.013.015.515
001.033.000.518
Description/Account
Amount
COPIER COSTS - OPS/ADMIN
COPIER COSTS - PERMIT CTR
Total :
RETAINAGE RELEASE - PROTON 3
REMAINING CONTRACT - PROTON
Total :
CERTIFICATION RENEWAL: RYAN I
Total :
2018 TIP MAINTENANCE & UPDATE
Total :
DOT INSPECTION
DOT INSPECTION
DOT INSPECTION
DOT INSPECTION
DOT INSPECTION
DOT INSPECTION
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
BUSINESS CARDS
ADVERTISING
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Total :
Total :
Total :
Total :
Total :
655.07
219.66
1,776.84
11, 746.12
11,580.10
23,326.22
40.00
40.00
16,047.42
16, 047.42
679.44
151.12
3,246.71
126.12
151.12
225.38
4,579.89
23,617.16
23, 617.16
99.02
99.02
2,562.38
2,562.38
48.75
48.75
EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 52.63
Total : 52.63
Page: 3
vchlist
08/22/2018 11:24:50AM
Voucher List
Spokane Valley
Page: 4
Bank code: apbank
Voucher
Date Vendor
Invoice
45407 8/22/2018 000662 NAT'L BARRICADE & SIGN CO
100566
45408 8/22/2018 004850 NAVIA BENEFIT SOLUTIONS, HRA PLAN 10149458
45409 8/22/2018 001844 NIMRI, RABA
45410 8/22/2018 003090 NORTH 40 OUTFITTERS
45411 8/22/2018 000652 OFFICE DEPOT INC.
45412 8/22/2018 003653 PARTSMASTER
45413 8/22/2018 005049 PEDERSON, MICHAEL ROY
45414 8/22/2018 001089 POE ASPHALT PAVING INC.
45415 8/22/2018 002510 POHL SPRING WORKS INC
EXPENSES
084695/3
161574978001
161592647001
161592648001
163003587001
163025526001
163025792001
167683241001
172898143001
176218134001
184283368001
23309997
JULY 2018
45815
45816
176194
176348
Fund/Dept
001.040.041.558
001.018.016.518
001.018.014.514
101.042.000.542
001.040.041.543
001.040.041.543
001.040.041.543
001.040.041.543
001.040.041.543
001.040.041.543
001.040.041.543
001.040.041.543
001.076.301.571
001.018.014.514
101.000.000.542
101.042.000.542
101.042.000.542
311.000.000.595
101.000.000.542
101.000.000.542
Description/Account
Amount
SMALL TOOLS/MINOR EQUIPMENT
Total :
FLEX SPENDING ADMINISTRATION
Total :
EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT
Total :
SMALL TOOLS/MINOR EQUIPMENT
Total :
OFFICE SUPPLIES: CPW
OFFICE SUPPLIES: CPW
OFFICE SUPPLIES: CPW
OFFICE SUPPLIES: CPW
OFFICE SUPPLIES: CPW
OFFICE SUPPLIES: CPW
OFFICE SUPPLIES: CPW
OFFICE SUPPLIES: CPW
OFFICE SUPPLIES: CENTERPLACE
OFFICE SUPPLIES: FINANCE
Total :
REPAIR/MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES.
Total :
DEAD ANIMAL REMOVAL
Total :
2018 STREET MAINTENANCE
2018 STREET MAINTENANCE
Total :
REPAIR SUPPLIES: #207
REPAIR SUPPLIES: SNOWPLOWS
Total :
81.33
81.33
380.00
380.00
370.40
370.40
537.44
537.44
36.47
36.09
29.64
-14.13
2.36
16.42
-16.42
64.32
369.15
14.99
538.89
199.97
199.97
1,425.00
1,425.00
8,000.82
7,248.18
15,249.00
448.15
533.12
981.27
Page: 4
vchlist
08/22/2018 11: 24: 50AM
Voucher List
Spokane Valley
Page: 5
Bank code : apbank
Voucher
Date Vendor
Invoice
45416 8/22/2018 005968 PRECISE MRM LLC
45417 8/22/2018 003208 RODDA PAINT CO.
45418 8/22/2018 002520 RWC GROUP
45419 8/22/2018 002835 SCS DELIVERY INC
45420 8/22/2018 003133 SHAMROCK MANUFACTURING INC
45421 8/22/2018 002531 SIX ROBBLEES INC
45422 8/22/2018 006773 SMARSH
45423 8/22/2018 000090 SPOKANE CO INFO SYSTEMS
45424 8/22/2018 000001 SPOKANE CO TREASURER
45425 8/22/2018 004099 SPOKANE VALLEY ACE HARDWARE
45426 8/22/2018 000093 SPOKESMAN -REVIEW, THE
45427 8/22/2018 000065 STAPLES ADVANTAGE
1N200-1017694
09488094
80237N
11985
6489
5-831215
INV00388315
50317585
14801011
24772
24784
24794
RENEWAL
3386275038
3386275042
3386275044
Fund/Dept
402.402.000.531
001.090.000.519
101.000.000.542
001.011.000.511
101.042.000.542
101.000.000.542
001.011.000.511
001.040.043.558
001.090.000.566
101.042.000.542
101.042.000.542
101.042.000.542
001.011.000.511
001.090.000.519
001.090.000.519
001.090.000.519
Description/Account
Amount
DATA PLAN
Total :
SUPPLIES: CARNAHAN HOME
Total :
SUPPLIES FOR #209
BROADCASTING
SUPPLIES: STREET DEPT.
SUPPLIES FOR #208
Total :
Total :
Total :
Total :
TEXT MESSAGING ARCHIVING CO
Total :
COUNTY 1T SUPPORT JULY 2018
Total :
2ND QTR 2018 LIQUOR/EXCISE TA
275.00
275.00
303.40
303.40
48.48
48.48
75.00
75.00
422.45
422.45
63.97
63.97
355.95
355.95
14, 756.56
14,756.56
6,525.68
Total : 6,525.68
SMALL TOOLS/MINOR EQUIPMENT
SMALL TOOLS/MINOR EQUIPMENT
SMALL TOOLS/MINOR EQUIPMENT
Total :
SUBSCRIPTION ACCOUNT 288112E
Total :
KITCHEN SUPPLIES
KITCHEN SUPPLIES
KITCHEN SUPPLIES
52.50
60.79
108.80
222.09
180.00
180.00
57.16
-0.98
0.98
Page: 5
vchlist
08/22/2018 11:24:50AM
Voucher List
Spokane Valley
Page: 6
Bank code : apbank
Voucher
Date Vendor
Invoice
45427 8/22/2018 000065 000065 STAPLES ADVANTAGE
45428 8/22/2018 000257 STATE AUDITOR'S OFFICE
45429 8/22/2018 006865 THOMAS, DEAN & HOSKINS INC
45430 8/22/2018 004740 THOMSON REUTERS -WEST
45431 8/22/2018 005732 TNT TRUCK PARTS
45432 8/22/2018 002597 TWISTED PAIR ENTERPRISES LLC
45433 8/22/2018 006846 US LINEN & UNIFORM INC
45434 8/22/2018 006847 VALLEY MACHINE
45435 8/22/2018 000087 VERIZON WIRELESS
45436 8/22/2018 002651 WOODARD, ARNE
(Continued)
L126760
13522
838667157
S 41770
S 41771
7252018
2200267
S0018639
23244
9811172796
EXPENSES
45437 8/22/2018 006876 YARBROUGH, MICHAEL J & MICHELLE L 08-09-2018
58 Vouchers for bank code : apbank
58 Vouchers in this report
Fund/Dept
001.090.000.514
303.303.123.595
001.013.015.515
101.000.000.542
101.000.000.542
001.011.000.511
101.042.000.543
101.042.000.543
101.000.000, 542
001.076.302.576
001.011.000.511
303.000.247.595
Description/Account
Amount
SAO AUDIT OF 2017
Total :
Total :
C1P 0123 - ON-CALL CONSTRUCTI(
Total :
SUBSCRIPTION CHARGES
REPAIR SUPPLIES: #207
REPAIR SUPPLIES: #209
Total :
Total :
BROADCASTING COUNCIL MTGS
Total :
SUPPLIES: MAINTENANCE SHOP
SUPPLIES: MAINTENANCE SHOP
Total :
REPAIR SUPPLIES: SNOWPLOWS
Total
6/19/18-7/18/18 VERIZON CELL PH(
Total :
EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT
Total :
CIP 0247: MOVING EXPENSES RE
Total :
57.16
12,628.36
12,628.36
10,007.53
10,007.53
805.12
805.12
289.95
297.02
586.97
1,424.00
1,424.00
20.18
20.18
40.36
489.60
489.60
3,367.86
3,367.86
101.16
101.16
1,470.33
1,470.33
Bank total : 232,049.58
Total vouchers : 232,049.58
Page: 6
vchlist
08!28120'18 9:48:18AM
Voucher List
Spokane Valley
Page: 9
Bank code : apbank
Voucher
Date Vendor
Invoice
45438 8/28/2018 000050 APA- INLAND EMPIRE SECTION
45439 8/28/2018 006916 ARCHITECTURAL VENTURES
45440 8/28/2018 002326 BATTERIES PLUS BULBS
45441 8/28/2018 000322 CENTURYLINK
45442 8/28/2018 001888 COMCAST
45443 8/28/2018 000683 DAVID EVANS & ASSOCIATES
45444 8/28/2018 003624 DEHN, SHELLY
45445 8/28/2018 003274 EXCHANGE PUBLISHING LLC
45446 8/28/2018 001926 FARR. SARAH
45447 8/28/2018 003261 FEHR & PEERS
45448 8/28/2018 002134 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE
127299
127346
SEP -2018-0012
P4020275
AUGUST 2018
Aug 18 -Sep 17 2018
426075
EDUCATION
501949
501950
501951
501952
501953
EXPENSES
124231
861-425964629
Fund/Dept
001.040.042.558
001.040.042.558
001.040.043.345
001.090.000.518
001.076.000.576
001.090.000.518
101.042.000.542
001.018.016.518
001.013.000.513
001.013.000.513
001.040.043.558
001.040.043.558
001.040.043.558
001.018.014.514
001.090.000.513
001.013.015.515
Description/Account
Amount
2018 ANNUAL CONFERENCE: C. BL
2018 ANNUAL CONFERENCE: C. Q
Total
PERMIT REFUND: SEP -2018-0012
Total :
BATTERIES
Total :
2018 PHONE SVCS: ACCT 509 Z14 -
Total :
Total :
TRAFFIC SERVICES
Total :
INTERNET CITY HALL
EDUCATION REIMBURSEMENT
Total :
LEGAL PUBLICATION
LEGAL PUBLICATION
LEGAL PUBLICATION
LEGAL PUBLICATION
LEGAL PUBLICATION
EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT
Total
Total :
SOUTH BARKER CORRIDOR STUD
Total :
TITLE INSURANCE: ESTATE OF M
590.00
295.00
885.00
350.00
350.00
130.56
130.56
547.98
547.98
106.17
106.17
3,465.64
3,465.64
1,650 00
1,650.00
31.60
26.86
59.25
78.21
75.84
271.76
77.94
77.94
16,582.80
16,582.80
896.51
vchllst
08/28/2018 9:48:18AM
Voucher List
Spokane Valley
Page: ' —
Bank code : apbank
Voucher
Date Vendor
Invoice
45448 8/28/2018 002134 002134 FIRSTAMERICAN TITLE
45449 8/28/2018 001447 FREE PRESS PUBLISHING INC
45450 8/28/2018 000007 GRAINGER
45451 8/28/2018 002568 GRANICUS INC
45452 8/28/2018 001944 LANCER LTD
45453 8/28/2018 004632 LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS
45454 8/28/2018 000652 OFFICE DEPOT INC.
(Continued)
48932
48933
48936
48937
48938
9868021883
9870345858
101158
98709
98737
0470581
0470656
72562096
181246925001
184282186001
185816215001
185816834001
187288679001
45455 8/28/2018 000307 OFFICE OF THE STATE TREASURER JULY 2018
45456 8/28/2018 005050 OGDEN MURPHY WALLACE PLLC 815741
Fund/Dept
001.013.000.513
001.013.000.513
001.040.043.558
001.040.043.558
001.040.043.558
001.016.016.521
001.016.016.521
107.000.000.594
107.000.000.594
001.011.000.511
001.090.000.519
001.040.042.558
001.076.305.575
001.090.000.518
001.018.014.514
001.090.000.519
001.090.000.519
001.013.015.515
001.016.000.589
001.013.015.515
Description/Account
Amount
LEGAL PUBLICATION
LEGAL PUBLICATION
LEGAL PUBLICATION
LEGAL PUBLICATION
LEGAL PUBLICATION
Total :
Total :
REPAIR & MAINT. SUPPLIES: PREC
REPAIR & MAINT. SUPPLIES: PREC
Total :
GRANICUS ANNUAL SUPPORT AN[
GRANICUS ANNUAL SUPPORT AN[
GRAN1CUS ANNUAL SUPPORT AN[
Total :
ENVELOPES
RESOURCE CARDS
TELECOM SERVICES
Total :
Total :
SMALL TOOLS/MINOR EQUIP: GEN
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES: GEN'L GOVT
OFFICE SUPPLIES: GEN'L GOVT
OFFICE SUPPLIES: LEGAL
Total
STATE REMITTANCE
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Total :
Total :
896.51
34.85
32.30
65.45
88.40
92.65
313.65
89.21
35.51
124.72
3,739.52
2,040.01
9,309.43
15,088.96
212.17
44.06
256.23
1,349.67
1,349.67
203.67
22.62
20.66
14.00
117.06
378.01
45,686.74
45,686.74
504.00
504.00
vchlist
0812812018 9:48:18AM
Voucher List
Spokane Valley
Page:
Bank code : apbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount
45457 8/28/2018 001089 POE ASPHALT PAVING INC. 2017 Retainage 101,223.40.00 2017 STREET/STORMWATER MAIN 67,378.54
Total : 67,378.54
45458 8/28/2018 000308 SPOKANE CO PROSECUTING ATTY JULY 2018 001.016.000.589 CRIME VICTIMS COMPENSATION F 672.71
Total : 672.71
45459 8/28/2018 000419 SUMMIT LAW GROUP PLLC 94641 001.018.016.518 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 152.50
Total : 152.50
45460 8/28/2018 002291 WACE Fall 2018 001.040.043.524 WACE FALL 2018 CONFERENCE: I\ 200.00
Total : 200.00
45461 8/28/2018 000842 WM WINKLER COMPANY PAY APP 6 309.000.237.595 0237 -CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT 33,210.68
Total : 33,210.68
24 Vouchers for bank code : apbank Bank total : 190,280.77
24 Vouchers in this report
Total vouchers : 190,280.77
Page: —3--
vchlist
08128/2018 12:37:16PM
/C
Voucher List Page: —1—
Spokane Valley
Bank code : apbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount
45462 8/28/2018 003076 AMSDEN, ERICA Expenses 001.040.041.543 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 38.15
Total : 38.15
45463 8128/2018 000619 COSTCO MEMBERSHIP 111810668149 001.090.000.518 ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL 120,00
Total : 120.00
45464 8/28/2018 006890 FISH WINDOW CLEANING #3097 3097-18374 001.033.000.518 WINDOW CLEANING AT CITY HALL 1,980.00
Total : 1,980.00
45465 8/28/2018 006002 GREGERSON, TINA Expenses 001.076.301.571 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 24.45
Total : 24.45
45466 8/28/2018 006917 JOHNSON, SONIA ROW -2018-0613 001.040.041.322 PERMIT REFUND: ROW -2018-0613 172.20
Total : 172.20
45467 8/28/2018 000252 LOWE'S BUSINESS ACCOUNT August 2018 001.033.000.518 OPERATING SUPPLIES: CITY HALL 564.17
Total : 564.17
45468 8/28/2018 006918 OSMOSE UTILITIES SERVICES ROW -2018-0718 001.040.041.322 PERMIT REFUND: ROW -2018-0718 37.92
Total : 37.92
45469 8/28/2018 004029 ROSS PRINTING COMPANY 103723 001.076.305.575 CENTERPLACE BAG CLIPS FOR M. 1,035.78
Total : 1,035.78
45470 8/28/2018 000709 SENSKE LAWN & TREE CARE INC. 8557143 402.402.000.531 FLAGGING SVC CONTRACT: JULY 530.94
8557211 402.402.000.531 ROADSIDE LANDSCAPING SVCS:. 6,768.53
Total : 7,299.47
45471 8/28/2018 000324 SPOKANE CO WATER DIST #3 Aug 2018 402.402.000.531 WATER CHARGES FOR AUG 2018 a 1,605.93
Aug 2018 #2 402.402.000.531 WATER CHARGES FOR JULY 2018 1,446.56
Total : 3,052.49
45472 8/28/2018 000898 SPOKANE PROCARE INC 627579 402.402.000.531 2018 ROADSIDE WEED SPRAYING 2,874.85
Total : 2,874.85
45473 8/28/2018 000404 SPOKANE VALLEY HERITAGE MUSEUM Aug 2018 105.000.000.557 2018 LODGING TAX GRANT REIMB 109.00
Aug 2018 105.000.000.557 2018 LODGING TAX GRANT REIMB 897.90
Page: —Ir
vchlist
08!2812018 12: 37:16 P M
Voucher List
Spokane Valley
fr
Page:
Bank code : apbank
Voucher
Date Vendor
invoice
45473 8128/2018 000404 SPOKANE VALLEY HERITAGE MUSEUM (Continued)
Aug 2018
Aug 2018
Aug 2018
Aug 2018
Aug 2018
August 2018
45474
45475
45476
45477
45478
8128/2018 001969 SUNSHINE DISPOSAL
8/28/2018 006422 SUPPLYWORKS
1330114
449265396
8/28/2018 000038 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF SPOKANE 0067999-1518-3
8/28/2018 000487 YMCA OF THE INLAND NW
8/28/2018 004961 ZOME INC
17 Vouchers for bank code : apbank
17 Vouchers in this report
Aug 2018
36460,61,62
Fund/Dept
105.000.000.557
105.000.000.557
105.000.000.557
105.000.000.557
105.000.000.557
105.000.000.557
101.042.000.542
001.090.000.519
402.402.000.531
001.076.302.576
001.076.301.571
Description/Account
Amount
2018 LODGING TAX GRANT REIMB
2018 LODGING TAX GRANT RE1MB
2018 LODGING TAX GRANT RE1MB
2018 LODGING TAX GRANT REIMB
2018 LODGING TAX GRANT REIMB
2018 LODGING TAX GRANT REIMB
Total :
TRANSFER STATION: CPW JULY 2(
Total :
SUPPLIES FOR CITY HALL KITCHE
Total :
WASTE MGMT: VACTORING WAST
Total :
OPERATING EXPENSES: WAGES C
Total :
UNIFORMS FOR DAY CAMP & STAF
Total :
290.00
2,520.00
490.00
300.00
428.00
428.00
5,462.90
421.61
421.61
43.00
43.00
823.28
823.28
48,007.49
48,007.49
2,370.39
2,370.39
Bank total : 74,328.15
Total vouchers : 74,328.15
vchllst
08/2812018 2:52:26PM
Voucher List
Spokane Valley
Page: "tom
Bank code :: pk-ref
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount
7916 8/28/2018 006891 BUECHEL, ROBERT PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: GREENACRES 75.00
Total : 75.00
7917 8/28/2018 006892 BUTLER, VANESSA PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: GREAT ROOM': 500.00
Total : 500.00
7918 8/28/2018 006912 EAST CENTRAL COUNTY UNIT PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: VALLEY MISSIC 75.00
Total : 75.00
7919 8/28/2018 006893 ELAM, KAYLENE PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: DISCOVERY PL 75.00
Total : 75,00
7920 8/28/2018 006894 F5 NETWORKS INC PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: BROWNS PAR' 75.00
Total : 75.00
7921 8/28/2018 006914 FILIPINO AMERICAN ASSN PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: MIRABEAU ME, 75.00
Total : 75.00
7922 8/28/2018 006895 FINNIGAN, CONNOR PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: GREAT ROOM/: 500.00
Total : 500.00
7923 8/28/2018 005282 GENESIS CHURCH PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: MIRABEAU ME, 75.00
Total : 75.00
7924 8/28/2018 006896 GRAHAM, MISTY PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: VALLEY MISSIC 75.00
Total : 75.00
7925 8/28/2018 006897 GRETCH, SUZANNE PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: VALLEY MISSIC 75.00
Total : 75.00
7926 8/28/2018 006898 HAYDEN, STEPHANIE PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: MIRABEAU ME, 300.00
Total : 300.00
7927 8/28/2018 004484 INSHRM PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: MIRABEAU ME, 75.00
Total : 75.00
7928 8128/2018 006250 JONES, CHRISTOPHER PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: TERRACE VIEV 75.00
Page: �_
vchlist
08128/2018 2:52:26PM
Voucher List Page: 2
Spokane Valley
Bank code : pk-ref
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount
7928 8/28/2018 006250 006250 JONES, CHRISTOPHER
(Continued)
Total : 75.00
7929 8/28/2018 006899 KE I I LESON, FRANKI PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: MIRABEAU ME, 300.00
Total : 300.00
7930 8/28/2018 006584 KUNTZ, KAREN PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: TERRACE VIEV 75.00
Total : 75.00
7931 8/28/2018 006900 LABUSOHR, SHAWNA PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: GREENACRES 75.00
Total : 75.00
7932 8/28/2018 006261 LDS CHURCH PONDEROSA WARD PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: TERRACE VIEV 75.00
Total : 75.00
7933 8/28/2018 006901 NORTH BY NORTHWEST RELAYS PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: SULLIVAN PARI 300.00
Total : 300.00
7934 8/28/2018 006913 PARSONS, ABBEY PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: MIRABEAU ME, 159.00
Total : 159.00
7935 8/28/2018 006902 ROEGELE, JULIE PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 SUMMER DAY CAMP REFUND 118.00
Total : 118.00
7936 8/28/2018 006903 SELLEGOUNDER, DURAI PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: TERRACE VIEV 150.00
Total : 150.00
7937 8/28/2018 006904 SOAR BEHAVIOR SERVICES PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: DISCOVERY PL 75.00
Total : 75.00
7938 8/28/2018 006905 SORENSON COMMUNICATIONS PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: GREENACRES 75.00
Total : 75.00
7939 8/28/2018 006911 SPOKANE ALLERGY & ASTHMA PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: GREENACRES 75.00
Total : 75.00
7940 8/28/2018 006906 TALK, LEARN AND COMMUNICATE PARKS REFUND 001 237 10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: DISCOVERY P1 150.00
Total : 150.00
7941 8/28/2018 006907 TAYLOR, KRISTINE PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: TERRACE VIEV 75.00
Page:
vchlist
08/28/2018 2:52:26PM
Voucher List
Spokane Valley
(q
Page:
Bank code : pk-ref
Voucher
Date Vendor
Invoice
7941 8/28/2018 006907 006907 TAYLOR, KRISTINE
7942 8/28/2018 006908 TORESON, KAREN
7943 8/28/2018 006909 TUCKER, STEVE
7944 8/28/2018 006910 ZANDELL, SANDRA
29 Vouchers for bank code : pk-ref
29 Vouchers in this report
I, the undersigned, do certify under penalty of perjury,.
that the materials have been furnished, the services
rendered, or the labor performed as described herein
and that the claim is just, due and an unpaid
obligation against the City of Spokane Valley, and that
I am authorized to authenticate and certify said claim.
Finance Director Date
Council member reviewed:
Mayor
Date
Council Member Date
(Continued)
PARKS REFUND
PARKS REFUND
PARKS REFUND
Fund/Dept
001.237.10.99
001.237,10.99
001.237.10.99
DescriptionlAccount
Amount
Total :
DEPOSIT REFUND: MIRABEAU ME,
Total :
DEPOSIT REFUND: SULLIVAN PARI
Total :
DEPOSIT REFUND. DISCOVERY PL
Total :
Bank total :
Total vouchers :
75.00
75.00
75.00
75.00
75.00
75.00
75.00
3,977.00
3,977.00
Page:
vchlist
08/30/2018 3:18:07PM
Voucher List
Spokane Valley
Page:
Bank code : apbank
Voucher
Date Vendor
Invoice
45479 8/30/2018 000648 ABADAN REPROGRAPHICS
91493
93515
93516
93678
45480 8/30/2018 002816 ABLE CLEAN-UP TECHNOLOGIES INC 18428
45481 8/30/2018 003078 ALLWESTTESTING & ENGINEERING 89303
90089
90093
45482 8/30/2018 000135 APA
45483 8/30/2018 000168 BLACK BOX NETWORK SVC
45484 8/30/2018 002993 BROADWAY INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY
45485 8/30/2018 000796 BUDINGER & ASSOCIATES INC
45486 8/30/2018 002562 CD'A METALS
45487 8/30/2018 000101 CDW-G
45488 8/30/2018 000322 CENTURYLINK
45489 8/30/2018 000571 CODE PUBLISHING COMPANY
144189-1871
SPO -195187
433141
M18373-1
Fund/Dept
303.303.166.595
311.000.254.595
303.000.258.595
311.000.254.595
Description/Account
Amount
PRINT SERVICE
PRINT SERVICE
PRINT SERVICE
PRINT SERVICE
101.043.000.542 ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP
303.303.142.595
311.000.248.595
303.303.123.595
0142 -MATERIALS TESTING
0248 -MATERIALS TESTING
0123 -MATERIALS TESTING
001.040.042.558 MEMBERSHIP 2018 C BATES
001.090.000.518 IT SUPPORT
101.000.000.542 SUPPLIES: SNOWPLOWS
303.000.201.595 0201 -MATERIALS TESTING
375970 101.043.000.542 SUPPLIES: BRIDGE
376147 101.043.000.542 SUPPLIES: BRIDGE
N RZ6290
AUGUST 2018
61056
Total :
Total :
Total :
Total :
Total :
Total :
Total :
Total :
001.090.000.518 COMPUTER HARDWARE NON -CAF
Total :
001.090.000.518 CITY HALL PHONES
Total :
001 013,000.513 ELECTRONIC CODE UPDATE
193.45
477.03
576.20
708.77
1,955.45
2,219.52
2,219.52
1,870.50
5,254.84
11, 640,44
18,765.78
472.50
472.50
177.89
177.89
83.49
83.49
1,583.89
1,583.89
695.01
88.73
783.74
376.32
376.32
258.08
258.08
549.44
Page:
vchlist
08/3012018 3:18:07PM
Voucher List
Spokane Valley
Page: `F
Bank code: apbank
Voucher
Date Vendor
Invoice
45489 8/30/2018 000571 000571 CODE PUBLISHING COMPANY (Continued)
45490 8/30/2018 001880 CROWN WEST REALTY LLC
45491 8/30/2018 003255 DAY WIRELESS SYSTEMS
45492 8/30/2018 002604 DELL FINANCIAL SERVICES LLC
45493 8/30/2018 000999 EASTERN WA ATTORNEY SVC INC
SEPTEMBER 2018
605460
79634357
116278
45494 8/30/2018 000007 GRAINGER 9876103442
9880679353
45495 8/30/2018 002201 HARBOR FREIGHTTOOLS
45496 8/30/2018 005353 INTERMOUNTAIN MATERIALS
45497 8/30/2018 002466 KENWORTH SALES COMPANY
45498 8/30/2018 001944 LANCER LTD
45499 8/30/2018 001640 MAINTENANCE SOLUTIONS INC
852865
9876
9947
SP0R02965172
S P O R 02972167
0470639
081522102
45500 8/30/2018 000636 MOORE IACOFANO GOLTSMAN, INC. 54767
Fund/Dept
101.042.000.543
101.042.000.543
001.090.000.548
001.013.015.515
001.040.041.543
101.042.000.542
001.090.000.519
303.000.264.595
303.000.264.595
101.000.000.542
101.000.000.542
001.040.041.543
101.042.000.543
309.000.227.595
Description/Account
Amount
Total :
COMMON AREA CHARGES FOR M)
Total :
TOWER RENTAL
Total :
COMPUTER LEASE: 001-8922117-0
Total :
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Total :
SMALL TOOLS/MINOR EQUIPMENT
SMALLTOOLS/MINOR EQUIPMENT
Total :
SUPPLIES: CARNAHAN PROPERTI
Total :
0264 - MATERIALS TESTING
0264 - MATERIALS TESTING
Total :
DOT INSPECTION/REPAIRS FOR #:
DOT INSPECTION
BUSINESS CARDS
Total :
Total :
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: STREE
Total :
549.44
219.64
219.64
212.33
212.33
862.93
862.93
40.00
40.00
31.10
63.63
94.73
36.96
36.96
6,082.20
439.22
6,521.42
1,279.39
151.00
1,430.39
38.09
38.09
498.04
498.04
APPLEWAY TRAIL - PINES TO EVEI 1,688.98
Total : 1,688.98
vchlist
08/30/2018 3:18:07PM
Voucher List
Spokane Valley
Page:
Bank code : apbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount
45501 8/30/2018 002203 NAPAAUTO PARTS 0538-884537 101.042.000.542 SUPPLIES FOR #5-214 15.18
1713-102590 101.042.000.542 SUPPLIES: MAINT. SHOP 10.33
Total : 25.51
45502 8/30/2018 004621 OREILLYAUTOMOTIVE STORES INC 2862-286395 001.040.043.558 SUPPLIES FOR #4-010 - 2015 ESC/ 35.97
Total : 35.97
45503 8/30/2018 004173 POWDERTECH 35640 101.000.000.542 SANDBLAST GRATES: SNOWPLOV 489.60
Total : 489.60
45504 8/30/2018 003208 RODDA PAINT CO. 9488179 001.090.000.519 SUPPLIES: CARNAHAN PROPERTI 43.87
Total : 43.87
45505 8/30/2018 000031 ROYAL BUSINESS SYSTEMS IN87791 001.040.043.558 AUGUST 2018 COPIER COSTS 1,812.31
Total : 1,812.31
45506 8/30/2018 000001 SPOKANE CO TREASURER 110100210 101.042.000.542 JULY2018 ENGINEERING 71,945.40
51504432 001.016.000.523 AUGUST 2018 HOUSING 134,244.81
51504448 101.042.000.542 WORK CREW INVOICE JULY 2018 6,683.20
Total : 212, 873.41
45507 8/30/2018 000710 SPOKANE COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION 24087 001.013.015.515 DUES 2018-2019 0 DRISKELL 105.00
32844 001.013.015.515 DUES 2018-2019 R MCFETRIDGE 105.00
40557 001.013.015.515 DUES 2018-2019 E LAMB 105.00
Total : 315.00
45508 8/30/2018 001903 SPOKANE TRAFFIC CONTROL INC 3572 101.043.000.542 TRAFFIC CONTROL 1,134.00
Total : 1,134.00
45509 8/30/2018 001875 STRATA INCORPORATED SP180263-IN 303.303.166.595 0166 -MATERIALS TESTING 3,601.47
Total : 3,601.47
45510 8/30/2018 006413 THOMPSON, LINDA EXPENSES 001.011.000.511 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 278.98
Total : 278.98
45511 8/30/2018 006847 VALLEY MACHINE 23247 101.000.000.542 REPAIR SUPPLIES: SNOWPLOWS 48.96
Total : 48.96
vchlist
08/30/2018 3:18:07PM
Voucher List
Spokane Valley
/G
Page: —4—
Bank code : apbank
Voucher
Date Vendor
Invoice
45512 8/30/2018 000087 VERIZON WIRELESS
45513 8/30/2018 000158 WELCH COMER & ASSOC. INC
45514 8130/2018 004741 ZUMAR INDUSTRIES INC
36 Vouchers for bank code : apbank
36 Vouchers in this report
I, the undersigned, do certify under penalty of penury,
that the materials have been furnished, the services
rendered, or the labor performed as described herein
and that the claim is just, due and an unpaid
obligation against the City of Spokane Valley, and that
I am authorized to authenticate and certify said claim.
Finance Director Date
Council member reviewed:
Mayor Date
Council Member Date
9813025555
51043001-004
51060000-006
24164
Fund/Dept
001.076.302.576
309.000.237,595
303.000.249.595
101 042.000.542
DescriptionlAccount
Amount
7/19/18-8/18/18 VERIZON CELL PH(
2,834.24
Total : 2,834.24
16-058: CIP 0237 ENGINEERING S\,
0249 -DESIGN SERVICES
895.03
475.56
Total : 1,370.59
MEGA MARKERS AND STAND BASE
2,329.41
Total : 2,329.41
Bank total : 266,062.93
Total vouchers : 266,062.93
Page:
vchlist
08/3012018 3:45:11 PM
Voucher List
Spokane Valley
Page:
9
Bank code : apbank
Voucher
Date Vendor
Invoice
45515 8/30/2018 001606 BANNER BANK
45516 8/30/2018 001606 BANNER BANK
45517 8/30/2018 001606 BANNER BANK
6368 Aug 2018
6368 Aug 2018
6368 Aug 2018
6368 Aug 2018
8573 Aug 2018
8573 Aug 2018
8573 Aug 2018
8573 Aug 2018
8599 Aug 2018
8599 Aug 2018
8599 Aug 2018
8599 Aug 2018
8599 Aug 2018
8599 Aug 2018
8599 Aug 2018
8599 Aug 2018
8599 Aug 2018
8599 Aug 2018
8599 Aug 2018
8599 Aug 2018
8599 Aug 2018
8599 Aug 2018
8599 Aug 2018
8599 Aug 2018
8599 Aug 2018
8599 Aug 2018
8599 Aug 2018
8599 Aug 2018
8599 Aug 2018
8599 Aug 2018
8599 Aug 2018
8599 Aug 2018
Fund/Dept
001.090.000.518
001.090.000.518
001.018.016.518
001.040.041.543
001.018.014.514
001.013.015.515
001.013.015.515
001.090.000.518
001.076.305.575
001.076.305.575
001.076.305.575
001.076.305.575
001.076.301.571
001.076.301.571
001.076.305.575
001.076.301.571
001.076.305.575
001.076.305.575
001.076.305.575
001.076.301.571
001.076.301.571
001.076.305.575
001.076.301.571
001.076.305.575
001 076.301.571
001.076.305.575
001.076.305.575
001.076.301.571
001.076.305.575
001.076.301.571
001.076.305.575
001.076.305.575
DescriptionlAccount
Amount
HARBOR FREIGHT TOOLS
COSTCO.COM
CRAIGSLIST.ORG
NAT'L INST OF BUILDING SCIENCE
Total :
COSTCO.COM
LEGAL BLUEBOOK
WSAMA
AMAZON.COM
Total :
FIRST AID SUPPLIES ONLINE
VIP PRODUCTIONS
WALMART
RSD SPOKANE
WALMART
ROLLER VALLEY
WEST PLAINS CHAMBER OF COMI
FIRST AID SUPPLIES ONLINE
DOLLAR TREE STORES
MICHAELS
WALMART
WALMART
MICHAELS
BEST BUY
WALMART
CONVOY SUPPLY
BOOST MOBILE
HOME DEPOT
SECO CONSTRUCTION SUPPLY
ROLLER VALLEY
WEST PLAINS CHAMBER OF COME
RAMADA
BEST LASER POINTERS
HOME DEPOT
32.62
979.17
25.00
200.00
1,236.79
571.18
50.28
30.00
87.03
738.49
87.03
166.37
38.38
135.80
110.49
368.00
25.00
52.68
16.32
19.56
119.98
16.35
35.27
138.14
39.48
15.50
35.00
28.26
20.13
398.00
25.00
144.36
10.00
253.21
Page: �Y�
"vchlist
08/30/2018 3:45:11PM
Voucher List
Spokane Valley
Page:
Bank code : apbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount
45517 8/30/2018 001606 001606 BANNER BANK (Continued) Total : 2,298.31
45518 8/30/2018 001606 BANNER BANK 9713 Aug 2018 001.040.043.558 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY 38.95
9713 Aug 2018 001.033.000.518 THE MASONRY CENTER 213.48
9713 Aug 2018 001.033.000.518 DEPT OF L &I 154.20
9713 Aug 2018 001.033.000.518 DEPT OF L&I 3.95
Total : 410.58
45519 8/30/2018 001606 BANNER BANK 8557 Aug 2018 001.011.000.511 AWC 200.00
8557 Aug 2018 001.011.000.511 GREATER SPOKANE INC 90.00
8557 Aug 2018 001.011.000.511 GREATER SPOKANE INC 60.00
8557 Aug 2018 001.011.000.511 CREDIT: GREATER SPOKANE INC -30.00
Total : 320.00
5 Vouchers for bank code : apbank Bank total : 5,004.17
5 Vouchers in this report
Total vouchers : 5,004.17
Page: �L'r
vchlist
09/05/2018 8:34:26AM
:72/
Voucher List Page:
Spokane Valley
Bank code : pk-ref
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount
7945 9/5/2018 006919 ALTIMORE, LEAH PARKS REFUND 001 237,10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: DISCOVERY Pt 145.00
Total : 145.00
7946 9/5/2018 000334 ARGUS JANITORIAL LLC PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: EDGECLIFF PA 75 00
Total : 75.00
7947 9/5/2018 006928 BECU LOSS MANAGEMENT PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: MIRABEAU MEQ 75.00
Total : 75.00
7948 9/5/2018 006929 BENNER, PEGGY PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: GREENACRES 75.00
Total : 75.00
7949 9/5/2018 006930 BENNINGER, TROY PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: BROWNS PAR' 75.00
Total : 75.00
7950 9/5/2018 003920 BERKOWITZ, JOAN PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: EDGECLIFF PA 75.00
Total : 75.00
7951 9/5/2018 006297 COLUMBIA DISTRIBUTING PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: MIRABEAU ME 75.00
Total : 75.00
7952 9/5/2018 005254 DINNEN, CHASITY PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: VALLEY MISSIC 75.00
Total : 75.00
7953 9/5/2018 006931 FARMER, LAKECIA PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: VALLEY MISSIC 76.00
Total : 76.00
7954 9/5/2018 006932 FISHER, JOET PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: GREAT ROOM 490.00
Total : 490.00
7955 9/5/2018 006920 GREEN, JENNY PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 SWIMMING LESSON REFUND 35.00
Total : 35.00
7956 9/5/2018 001673 HOSPICE OF SPOKANE PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: VALLEY MISSIC 159.00
Total : 159.00
7957 9/5/2018 005341 HOSSAIN, AWLAD PARKS REFUND 001,237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: GREENACRES 75.00
Page: �r
vchlist
09/05/2018 8:34:26AM
Voucher List
Spokane Valley
�L-
Page:
Bank code : pk-ref
Voucher
Date Vendor
Invoice
7957 9/5/2018 005341 005341 HOSSAIN, AWLAD
7958 9/5/2018 000979 IRS ENVIRONMENTAL OF WA INC
7959 9/5/2018 006933 KENCK, JENNIFER
7960 9/5/2018 006934 KOSTELECKY, KATHY
(Continued)
PARKS REFUND
PARKS REFUND
PARKS REFUND
7961 9/5/2018 002057 MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION PARKS REFUND
7962 9/5/2018 003952 NELSON, JERRY
7963 9/5/2018 006935 PURCELL SYSTEMS
7964 9/5/2018 004726 SEARS 9480
7965 9/5/2018 006644 STOLLEY, MELISSA
7966 9/5/2018 003917 TAYLOR, GREG
7967 9/5/2018 000877 VALLEY FOURTH CHURCH
7968 9/5/2018 006936 WESTERN DANCE ASSN
7969 9/5/2018 004584 WITHEROW, KATY
25 Vouchers for bank code : pk-ref
PARKS REFUND
PARKS REFUND
PARKS REFUND
DEPOSIT REFUND
PARKS REFUND
PARKS REFUND
PARKS REFUND
PARKS REFUND
Fund/Dept
001.237.10.99
001.237.10.99
001.237.10.99
001.237.10.99
001.237.10.99
001.237.10.99
001.237.10.99
001.237.10.99
001.237.10.99
001.237.10.99
001.237.10.99
001.237.10.99
Description/Account
Amount
DEPOSIT REFUND:
DEPOSIT REFUND:
DEPOSIT REFUND:
DEPOSIT REFUND:
DEPOSIT REFUND:
DEPOSIT REFUND:
DEPOSIT REFUND:
Total :
ROOM 110
Total :
TERRACE VIEV
Total :
DISCOVERY PL
Total :
MIRABEAU ME,
Total :
VALLEY MISSIC
Total :
GREAT ROOM
Total :
DISCOVERY PL
Total :
DAY CAMP REFUND
DEPOSIT REFUND:
DEPOSIT REFUND:
DEPOSIT REFUND:
DEPOSIT REFUND:
Total :
MIRABEAU ME,
Total :
TERRACE VIEV
Total :
SULLIVAN PAR
Total :
EDGECLIFF PA
Total :
75.00
52.00
52.00
75.00
75.00
75.00
75.00
424.00
424.00
75.00
75.00
210.00
210.00
75.00
75.00
47.20
47.20
75.00
75.00
75.00
75.00
300.00
300.00
75.00
75.00
Bank total : 3,063.20
Page: _2�
vchlist
09/05/2018 12:53:55PM
Voucher List
Spokane Valley
Page: "1—
Bank code : apbank
Voucher
Date Vendor
Invoice
45520 9/5/2018 006937 ADVANCE AUTO PARTS
45521 9/5/2018 004278 ARCHITECTS WEST INC
45522 9/5/2018 006574 AWARD CONSTRUCTION INC
45523 9/5/2018 004231 BELSBY ENGINEERING
45524 9/5/2018 000571 CODE PUBLISHING COMPANY
45525 9/5/2018 002604 DELL FINANCIAL SERVICES LLC
45526 9/5/2018 002604 DELL FINANCIAL SERVICES LLC
45527 9/5/2018 000734 DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION
45528 9/5/2018 000734 DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION
45529 9/5/2018 000652 OFFICE DEPOT INC.
1921-258541
9821
PAY APP 2
18272
61183
79638405
79635500
RE-313-ATB80813048
RE-313-ATB80813057
RE 46 JG6457 L012
187288679002
191290953001
191292418001
45530 9/5/2018 001604 PACIFIC NW PAPER 192553
45531 9/5/2018 000868 POWER CITY ELECTRIC CON. INC. PAYAPP2
Fund/Dept Description/Account
Amount
101.042.000.542 SUPPLIES: STREET DEPT.
001.090.000.513
303.303.166.595
001.040.041.558
001.013.000.513
001.090.000.548
001.090.000.548
101.042.000.542
101.042.000.542
303.000.201.595
001.013.015.515
001.076.305.575
001.076.305.575
001.018.014.514
303.000.201.595
Total :
PROFESSIONAL SVCS - CITY HALL
Total :
0166 -CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
Total:
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Total :
ELECTRONIC CODE UPDATE
Total :
COMPUTER LEASE: 3 YR WORKS1
Total :
COMPUTER LEASE 3050 MICRO
Total :
REIMBURSE TRAFFIC SVCS
REIMBURSE ROADWAY MAINT
Total :
CIP 0201 TRAFFIC SIGNAL/ITS INS
Total :
OFFICE SUPPLIES: LEGAL
OFFICE SUPPLIES: CENTERPLACE
OFFICE SUPPLIES: CENTERPLACE
Total :
COPY PAPER
Total :
0201 -CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
64.96
64.96
13798
137.98
255,588.15
255,588.15
2,917.50
2,917.50
171.36
171.36
2,286.44
2,286.44
231.68
231.68
1,386.34
8,182.70
9,569.04
1,297.24
1,297.24
11.30
304.38
46.32
362.00
499.39
499.39
124, 595.48
Page:
vchlist
09/0512018 12:53:55PM
Voucher List
Spokane Valley
Page:l
—2'
Bank code: apbank
Voucher
Date Vendor
Invoice
45531 9/5/2018 000868 000868 POWER CITY ELECTRIC CON. INC. (Continued)
45532 9/5/2018 000675 RAMAX PRINTING & AWARDS INC 31007
45533 9/5/2018 000001 SPOKANE CO TREASURER
45534 9/5/2018 000854 SPW LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS
45535 9/5/2018 000065 STAPLES ADVANTAGE
45536 9/5/2018 000140 WALT'S MAILING SERVICE LTD
5040606 8/31/2018 000001 SPOKANE CO TREASURER
18 Vouchers for bank code : apbank
42000524
1755.02
1755.05
1755.08
3386275033
3386275034
3386275035
3386275036
62843
9290201379
Fund/Dept
001.011-000.511
001.016.000.554
303.303.123.595
303.303.123.595
303.303.123.595
001.040.043.558
001.040.043.558
001.040.043.558
001.040.043.558
311.000.254.595
001.016.000.521
Description/Account
Amount
NAME TAG
Total :
Total :
ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES SEP'
Total :
0123 -LANDSCAPE DESIGN
0123 -LANDSCAPE DESIGN
0123 -LANDSCAPE DESIGN
Total :
OFFICE SUPPLIES: COMM. DEV.
OFFICE SUPPLIES: COMM. DEV.
OFFICE SUPPLIES: COMM. DEV.
OFFICE SUPPLIES: COMM. DEV.
Total :
POSTAGE SERVICES
Total :
LE CONTRACT BILLING AUGUST 21
Total :
Bank total :
18 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers :
124,595,48
18.77
18.77
21,178.22
21,178.22
5,233.78
1,334.10
1,989.94
8,557.82
24.15
84.93
72.55
5.97
187.60
1,873.80
1,873.80
1,535,279.00
1,535,279.00
1,964,816.43
1,964,816.43
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: September 11, 2018 Department Director Approval :
Item: Check all that apply: ® consent ❑ old business ['new business ['public hearing
['information ❑admin. report ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Payroll for Pay Period Ending August 31, 2018
GOVERNING LEGISLATION:
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN:
BACKGROUND:
Budget/Financial impacts:
Employees Council Total
Gross: $ 307,311.22 $ 5,475.00 $ 312,786.22
Benefits: $ 179,401.83 $ 11,149.75 $ 190,551.58
Total payroll $ 486,713.05 $ 16,624.75 $ 503,337.80
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to Approve above payroll. [Approved as part of
the Consent Agenda, or may be removed and discussed separately.]
STAFF CONTACT: Raba Nimri
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: September 11, 2018 Department Director Approval:
Check all that apply: ® consent ❑ old business ® new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Motion Consideration — Set public hearing date for the 2019 Budget.
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: State budget law.
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: None.
BACKGROUND: State law requires the City to a set a public hearing date to review the 2019
Budget, and Staff is proposing October 9, 2018. This public hearing is included in the eight
separate opportunities the Council will have to discuss the budget, including public hearings to
gather input from citizens:
• June 12 Council Budget Workshop
• August 21 Admin report: Estimated 2019 revenues and expenditures
• September 11 Public hearing #1 on 2019 revenues and expenditures
• September 25 City Manager's presentation of preliminary 2019 Budget
• October 9 Public hearing #2 on 2019 Budget
• October 23 First reading on ordinance adopting the 2019 Budget
• November 13 Public Hearing #3 on 2019 Budget
• November 13 Second reading on ordinance adopting the 2019 Budget
OPTIONS: The Council could choose to set the public hearing on another date but the
recommendation will keep us on schedule to adopt the budget on November 13, 2019.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to set the 2019 Budget hearing date for October
9, 2019. [Approved as part of the Consent Agenda, or may be removed and discussed separately.]
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: This is part of the 2019 Budget development process leading
to its scheduled adoption on November 13, 2019.
STAFF CONTACT: Chelsie Taylor, Finance Director
ATTACHMENTS: None.
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: September 11, 2018
Check all that apply: ® consent ❑ old business
❑ information ❑ admin. report
Department Director Approval:
❑ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Motion Consideration: Centennial Trail Cooperative Agreement
Amendment
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: N/A
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Centennial Trail Cooperative Agreement approved in
June 2014; administrative report September 4, 2018.
BACKGROUND: The Spokane Centennial Trail comprises 37 miles of natural beauty following
the historic Spokane River from the Idaho state line to Nine Mile Falls, WA. Designed for use by
people of all ages and physical capabilities, the Trail is fully paved so it is ADA accessible. It is
used for commuting to both work and pleasure, and wildlife observation. The Trail is marked by
sites of historic and archaeological interest.
With its metropolitan center section in downtown Spokane, the Centennial Trail branches out to
more rural west and east endpoints, reaching into Idaho for a total of 61 miles. It mostly follows
the contours of the Spokane River and joins with Lake Coeur d'Alene, Idaho, connecting along
the way with the Liberty Lake Trail, Plantes Ferry Link Trail, and Cheney -Fish Lake Trail. There
are over 2 million uses per year on the Trail.
In 1979, Spokane County Parks proposed a bicycle/pedestrian pathway along the Spokane
River. In 1984, the Spokane Valley Chamber of Commerce formed a Parks and Recreation
Committee to explore this recreational possibility. In 1986, this group proposed a 10.5 -mile
recreational trail in the valley, naming it a Centennial Trail to coincide with Washington State's
100th birthday in 1989. In 1987, the internationally recognized architectural team, Jones &
Jones, was selected to develop a master plan for the Centennial Trail. It took a community to
build the trail system - fundraisers, volunteers, and local businesses.
In 1991, the Friends of the Centennial Trail was created, a nonprofit Washington corporation,
dedicated to the ongoing support of the public sector for the development, operation,
maintenance, and enhancement of the Spokane Centennial Trail. With the cooperation of the
entire community, roughly 30 miles of class 1 trail were completed by 1992. The remaining
seven miles consists of class 2 and 3 trails to create a contiguous trail system. The Trail is
maintained via a cooperative agreement between the Washington State Parks & Recreation
Commission and the City of Spokane, Spokane County and the City of Spokane Valley through
their respective parks departments with assistance by the Friends of the Centennial Trail.
The original cooperative agreement did not involve the City of Spokane Valley since we did not
become a City until 2003. However, since 2003, the City of Spokane Valley has been managing
and maintaining our portion of the Trail just as if we were a signatory on the original cooperative
agreement. On June 10, 2014 a new revised Centennial Trail Agreement which included the
City of Spokane Valley was approved by the City Council. The new agreement not only
included the City of Spokane Valley but it has been updated to reflect current maintenance
trends, costs, trail conditions and responsibilities. It also contains a management plan exhibit
and a trail maintenance fund exhibit.
The current amendment being considered by the City Council simply adds the City of Liberty
Lake to the agreement. The five entities, Washington State Parks, City of Spokane, Spokane
County, City of Spokane Valley and the City of Liberty Lake, all share in the maintenance and
operation of the Trail including the funding of the Trail Maintenance Fund. The Centennial Trail
Cooperative Council has been working on this amendment for over a year. Each jurisdiction is
being asked to approve this amendment.
OPTIONS Approve the agreement as presented.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to approve the agreement as presented.
[Approved as part of the Consent Agenda or may be removed and discussed separately/]
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: The City's Parks and Recreation budget includes $20,000
each year that is paid into the Trail Maintenance Fund administered by Spokane County for
capital projects, and approximately $70,000 that is spent on the operation and maintenance of
the sections of the Centennial Trail located within our corporate boundaries. No additional
financial impact required for this amendment.
STAFF CONTACT: Michael D. Stone, CPRP. Director of Parks and Recreation
ATTACHMENTS: Draft Amendment
DRAFT
Spokane River Centennial Trail
Interagency Cooperative Agreement
Amended
Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission
City of Spokane
Spokane County
City of Spokane Valley
City of Liberty Lake
THIS AGREEMENT, is made and entered this day of , 2018, by and
between SPOKANE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Washington, having
offices for the transaction of business at West 1116 Broadway Avenue, Spokane, Washington,
99260 ("COUNTY") and the City of Spokane, a municipal corporation of the State of
Washington, having offices for the transaction of business at 808 West Spokane Fall Boulevard,
Spokane Washington 99201 ("CITY"), the City of Spokane Valley, a municipal corporation of
the State of Washington, having offices for the transaction of business at 11707 E Sprague
Avenue, Spokane Valley, WA 99206 ("SPOKANE VALLEY"), the City of Liberty Lake, a
municipal corporation of the State of Washington, having officers for the transaction of business
at 22710 East Country Vista Drive, Liberty Lake, Washington, 99019 ("LIBERTY LAKE"),
and Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission, having offices for the transaction of
business at 1111 Israel Road, P.O. Box 42650, Olympia, WA 98504 ("COMMISSION").
Collectively, the COUNTY, LIBERTY LAKE, CITY, SPOKANE VALLEY and the
COMMISSION are referred to as the "PARTIES."
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the PARTIES are owners of land within or adjacent to the Spokane River
Centennial Trail ("Trail") corridor as described in Section 3 of this Agreement; and
WHEREAS, the Spokane River corridor is ecologically important, has significant potential
for interpretive purposes, provides outstanding scenic beauty, tranquil surroundings and valuable
historic and prehistoric features, is uniquely held in public ownership for the more than 39 miles
of its length, is the common thread that links governments, communities and neighborhoods
together, and has, for many thousands of years, been the corridor for commerce in the area and
provides significant recreational opportunities; and
WHEREAS, the PARTIES desire to provide for the development and operation of a multi-
purpose trail system within the intent and authority of RCW 79A.05.030 and RCW 39.34.030
(2); and
WHEREAS, the PARTIES agree that the primary development objective should be to
preserve the river environment and provide facilities for public access, recreation, education and
ecological and historic interpretation; and
Page 2 of 24
WHEREAS, the COMMISSION is authorized under RCW 79A.05.030 and RCW
39.34.030 (2) to cooperate with the COUNTY, LIBERTY LAKE, SPOKANE and SPOKANE
VALLEY in accomplishing the program herein referred to and to enter into this agreement to
that end; and
WHEREAS, the COMMISSION at its May 19, 1989 meeting authorized the Director or
designee to enter into a long-term cooperative agreement with multiple governmental entities for
the development and operation of the Spokane River Centennial Trail corridor (Trail); and
WHEREAS, the PARTIES agree that the Trail can most advantageously be managed by the
Commission with shared operation, maintenance and law enforcement responsibilities;
WHEREAS, LIBERTY LAKE's existing municipal boundaries are located adjacent to a
sizable stretch of the Spokane River Centennial Trail corridor and LIBERTY LAKE has
expressed a desire to contribute to the care and maintenance of the Trail through becoming a
voting member of the Coordinating Council,
WHEREAS, the PARTIES wish to further amend said Spokane River Centennial Trail
Agreement as set forth below.
NOW THEREFORE, in order for LIBERTY LAKE to become a voting member of the
Coordinating Council and in consideration of the mutual benefits to be derived, the PARTIES
hereby agree the Spokane River Centennial Trail Agreement is amended as follows:
Section 1: Term
The term of the Agreement shall extend through August 5th, 2034. This Agreement may be
renewed in 10 -year increments upon expiration of the original term by mutual agreement of the
PARTIES. The COMMISSION will be given the first right to renew the Agreement before any
Page 3 of 24
other party is given the opportunity to manage the Trail under agreement with the COUNTY,
LIBERTY LAKE, SPOKANE and SPOKANE VALLEY.
Section 2: Development and Management
(a) All development and management of the Trail shall be the responsibility of the
COMMISSION, unless otherwise provided herein, and the COMMISSION shall be the lead
agency in preparing future development plans. Operation, including maintenance and law
enforcement, shall be as set forth in Exhibit 1 - Management Plan ("Management Plan"), which
is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Each jurisdiction shall be
responsible for all costs related to providing ordinary Trail operation, maintenance and law
enforcement activities as outlined in the Management Plan. In the event of a capital repair or
project (a project that falls outside of the parameters of ordinary maintenance as outlined within
Exhibit 1 - Management Plan and/or exceeds $25,000 to complete), the underlying property
owner or lease holder shall assume full responsibility (financially and otherwise) for project
completion, barring any other agreements in place that may otherwise supersede.
(b) In the event of a capital repair or project impacting the Trail and/or associated buffer
lands, the responsible party may elect to petition the other PARTIES for evaluation of
opportunities for cooperative funding in accordance with Exhibit 2 — Trail Maintenance Fund
("Maintenance Fund") which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
Construction, alteration or repair to the Trail that is paid for in part or in whole from the
Maintenance Fund will require the unanimous approval of all PARTIES. PARTIES will also
agree to which entity will be responsible for carrying out the work including planning,
permitting, contracting, spending, and the liability associated with such activities. No such work
Page 4 of 24
will begin without the written approval of the plans by all PARTIES. Written approval can be in
letter form or electronically by e-mail. In the event of an emergency requiring immediate action
to protect persons or property, the PARTIES may call a special meeting or communicate by
phone or e-mail to approve emergency spending. All construction or reconstruction must
comply with applicable state and local laws. In the absence of cooperative funding, the
responsibility for capital repairs shall fall to the underlying land owner or lease holder for the
section of Trail in need of repair. The PARTIES shall meet every three years for the life of this
Agreement to review the capital funding threshold (currently at $25,000 — which is presently the
state threshold for capital funding).
Section 3: Coordinating Council
A Coordinating Council comprised of one (1) representative of each of the PARTIES, as
well as a non-voting representative of the Friends of the Centennial Trail, shall be established to
carry out all its responsibilities as outlined in the Management Plan and Maintenance Fund. The
Coordinating Council representative from each party to this Agreement shall be as follows:
• Washington State Parks: Riverside State Park Manager or Designee
• Spokane County: Parks, Recreation & Golf Director or Designee
• Spokane- Parks and Recreation Director or Designee
• Spokane Valley: Parks and Recreation Director or Designee
• Liberty Lake: Parks and Recreation Director or Designee
• Friends of The Centennial Trail (non-voting): Executive Director or Designee
Each representative shall have responsibility for disseminating information to other individuals
and parties in his/her group and for coordinating matters for the administrative working group.
Page 5 of 24
The designated representative shall have the authority to vote on fund spending priorities on
behalf of the organization they represent.
Section 4: Areas of Jurisdiction
i. The COMMISSION is primarily responsible for management of the entire 39 mile length of
the Trail and maintenance and law enforcement on or within the Trail corridor and
adjacent buffer lands within Riverside State Park from Nine Mile Recreation Area to the
TJ Meenach Bridge. The COMMISSION is not precluded, however, from conducting
maintenance or law enforcement on the entire Trail corridor and buffer lands to protect
safety and recreation on the Trail, including those areas where the COMMISSION is the
underlying property owner but another jurisdiction is responsible for management,
maintenance and law enforcement per this Agreement.
ii. SPOKANE is responsible for the management of adjacent CITY OR PARKS
DEPARTMENT -owned or leased buffer lands and maintenance and law enforcement on
or within the Trail corridor located within the existing and future municipal boundaries of
SPOKANE from the south end of the TJ Meenach Bridge to Centennial Trail Mile
Marker 16 near "Boulder Beach" beyond the eastern municipal boundary of SPOKANE.
iii. The COUNTY is responsible for management of adjacent COUNTY -owned or leased buffer
lands and maintenance and law enforcement on or within the Trail corridor from
Centennial Trail Mile Marker 16 near "Boulder Beach" to the Idaho border minus any
portion of the Trail corridor and adjacent buffer lands that are located in SPOKANE
VALLEY'S municipal boundaries (current and future) and along, adjacent to and/or
within Liberty Lake's municipal boundaries (current and future)— and minus any other
Page 6 of 24
portions of the Trail corridor and adjacent buffer lands in this stretch that become located
within an existing or future city(s) municipal limits (i.e. annexation, incorporation).
iv. SPOKANE VALLEY is responsible for management of adjacent city -owned or leased
buffer lands and maintenance and law enforcement on or within the Trail corridor within
its municipal boundaries (current and future).
v. LIBERTY LAKE is responsible for management of adjacent city -owned or leased buffer
lands and maintenance and law enforcement on or within the Trail corridor along,
adjacent and/or within its municipal boundaries (current and future), which currently
starts at the western line of the NE Quarter of Section 8, Township 25 Range 45 EWM
and continues east along the Centennial Trail to the east line of the NE Quarter of Section
10, Township 25 Range 45 EWM.
Section 5: Rules and Regulations
The Trail is to be managed consistent with the provisions of chapter 79A.05 RCW and the
rules and regulations adopted thereunder, unless otherwise exempted by the Director or
COMMISSION.
Section 6: Permits
Development and maintenance along the Trail corridor shall be done in full possession of all
necessary permits and licenses and in accordance with all applicable codes and regulations —
including SEPA — and consistent with the overall development plans prepared by the
COMMISSION. Obtaining permits will be the responsibility of the initiating party.
Page 7 of 24
Section 7: Cooperative Management
This Agreement allows management by the COUNTY, LIBERTY LAKE, SPOKANE and
SPOKANE VALLEY of COMMISSION -owned lands; and, by the COMMISSION of
COUNTY, LIBERTY LAKE, SPOKANE, and SPOKANE VALLEY -owned buffer lands within
the Trail corridor. Any modifications or uses of this property for other than buffer shall be
consistent with Trail development, preservation of the river corridor, and approved by
COMMISSION staff prior to use, modification or construction. Use of these lands for
recreation, education or river access purposes may be granted by amendment to this Agreement
upon approval of the proposed plans for said property by COMMISSION staff and approval of
use by the COMMISSION, and in accordance with all applicable Federal, state and local laws.
Section 8: Jurisdiction Approval
All new facilities and improvements made by the COMMISSION shall be consistent with
Trail development, preservation of the river corridor, and approved by the applicable jurisdiction
prior to construction. The COMMISSION shall be in possession of all necessary permits and
licenses and shall carry out all development, maintenance and operation in accordance with all
applicable Federal, state and local laws.
Section 9: Hamilton Street Bridge
The Hamilton Street pedestrian bridge and Don Kardong Bridge are located on SPOKANE -
owned property. Routine maintenance of these bridges will be the responsibility of SPOKANE.
Any repairs relating to the structural integrity of the bridges; and, if necessary, replacement will
be the responsibility of SPOKANE.
Page 8 of 24
Section 10: Denny-Ashlock Bridge
The Denny Ashlock pedestrian bridge is located on both COMMISSION and SPOKANE
VALLEY -owned property. Routine maintenance of this bridge will be the responsibility of the
party in whose jurisdiction the bridge resides (presently the COUNTY for the northern half of
the bridge, and SPOKANE VALLEY for the southern half of the bridge). Any repairs relating
to the structural integrity of the bridge and, if necessary, replacement will be the responsibility of
the COMMISSION.
Section 11: Entire Agreement
This Agreement grants only permission to allow the COMMISSION to use the COUNTY,
LIBERTY LAKE, SPOKANE and SPOKANE VALLEY -owned property and to allow the
COUNTY, LIBERTY LAKE, SPOKANE and SPOKANE VALLEY to use the COMMISSION -
owned property for the purposes and on the terms and conditions herein stated. No legal or
equitable title is conveyed hereby. Title to the subject property shall remain with the landowner
throughout the term of this Agreement and renewal thereof.
Section 12: Indemnification
To the extent permitted by law, the COUNTY and/or LIBERTY LAKE, SPOKANE and/or
SPOKANE VALLEY shall defend and hold harmless the COMMISSION and the State of
Washington, its officers, agents, employees, successors or assigns against any and all claims
suffered or alleged to be suffered on the property, except such claims which arise out of the
activities of the COMMISSION, its officers, agents or employees, for which claims the
Page 9 of 24
COMMISSION will defend and hold the COUNTY, LIBERTY LAKE, SPOKANE and/or
SPOKANE VALLEY harmless.
Section 13: Signs
The COMMISSION shall erect and maintain a sign(s) identifying the COUNTY, LIBERTY
LAKE, SPOKANE and SPOKANE VALLEY as cooperating agencies. Any development
authorized in accordance with Section 8 herein shall be signed by the applicable jurisdiction
identifying the COMMISSION as a cooperating agency. The COMMISSION will be the
primary focal point and contact for signing.
Section 14: Termination
This Agreement may be terminated at any time by mutual written consent of all PARTIES
hereto.
Section 15: Modification
The provisions of this Agreement may be modified at any time by the mutual consent of all
PARTIES hereto.
Section 16: Assignment of Rights
No rights under this Agreement may be assigned without the prior written consent of the
other PARTIES. This does not preclude third -party agreements which are in compliance with
the Management Plan.
Page 10 of 24
Section 17: Tree Removal
Any tree removal shall be in accordance with landowner rules and regulations.
Section 18: Non -Compliance
The Trail and adjoining buffer lands are to be used by the COMMISSION for public Trail
corridor purposes. Except as otherwise provided for herein, this Agreement may be terminated
by any party in the event of non-compliance by any other party with the terms and conditions
hereof, providing that the terminating party allow the non -complying party no less than ninety
(90) days written notice of violation in which to correct any situation which is not in compliance
with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. If correction is not made to the satisfaction of
the terminating party within the ninety (90) days, this Agreement will automatically terminate
without further notice.
Section 19: Removal of Improvements
Unless otherwise agreed, upon termination or expiration of this Agreement, all
improvements placed on property under this Agreement shall be disposed of in compliance with
applicable provisions of the Revised Code of Washington.
Section 20: Discover Pass
LIBERTY LAKE, SPOKANE, SPOKANE VALLEY, and the COUNTY have agreed to
contribute towards the operation, care and maintenance of portions of the Trail and associated
buffer lands as outlined herein. In recognition of this investment, the COMMISSION agrees
NOT to impose any parking or visitor fees (i.e. Discover Pass) for ordinary visitation and use of
Page 11 of 24
those trailheads and other areas commonly used for parking along portions of the Trail corridor
and buffer lands for which LIBERTY LAKE, SPOKANE, SPOKANE VALLEY, and the
COUNTY have maintenance responsibility.
Section 21: Trail Realignments and Connections
(a) Trail realignments which may be completed to address safety hazards, to separate the
Trail from stretches of roadway, to eliminate gaps, or to otherwise perfect the Trail shall become
part of this Agreement and the Party whose geographic area includes the new trail element(s)
shall assume jurisdictional responsibility for the new trail element(s) unless otherwise
determined by the PARTIES through modification of the Agreement.
(b) Future connections to the Trail such as neighborhood access points, local commuter
trails, or regional trail connections (e.g. Fish Lake Trail) are a stated goal in the adopted Spokane
County Regional Trails Plan. Trail connections shall be encouraged to be completed, but any
trails which have been connected to the Centennial Trail shall not become part of this Agreement
nor extend maintenance responsibilities by the PARTIES under this Agreement, unless otherwise
determined by the PARTIES through modification of the Agreement.
Section 22: Entities
No new entities are created by this Agreement.
Section 23: Agreement to be Filed
The PARTIES shall record this Agreement with the Spokane County Auditor.
Page 12 of 24
Section 24: Personal/Real Property/No Joint Board
There shall be no common ownership of any real or personal property under the terms of
this Agreement. Each party to this Agreement shall separately own its real and personal
property. The Coordinating Council referenced in Section 3 will administer the provisions of this
Agreement, as well as the Management Plan and Trail Maintenance Fund.
Page 13 of 24
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the PARTIES have caused this Interagency Cooperative
Agreement Amendment to be executed on the date and year opposite their respective signatures.
NOTE: There will be a separate signature page for each entity signing the agreement.
DATED: WASHINGTON STATE PARKS AND
RECREATION COMMISSION
Approved as to form:
By: Michael Young
Assistant Attorney General
March 1, 2018
By:
DIRECTOR
Page 14 of 24
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the PARTIES have caused this Interagency Cooperative
Agreement Amendment to be executed on the date and year opposite their respective signatures.
NOTE: There will be a separate signature page for each entity signing the agreement.
DATED: CITY OF SPOKANE
Attest:
By:
MAYOR
Approved as to form:
By:
City Clerk Assistant City Attorney
Page 15 of 24
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the PARTIES have caused this Interagency Cooperative
Agreement Amendment to be executed on the date and year opposite their respective signatures.
NOTE: There will be a separate signature page for each entity signing the agreement.
DATED: CITY OF LIBERTY LAKE
Attest:
By:
MAYOR
Approved as to form:
By:
City Clerk City Attorney
Page 16 of 24
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the PARTIES have caused this Interagency Cooperative
Agreement Amendment to be executed on the date and year opposite their respective signatures.
NOTE: There will be a separate signature page for each entity signing the agreement.
DATED: CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Attest:
By:
CITY MANAGER
Approved as to form:
By:
Chris Bainbridge, City Clerk Office of the City Attorney
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the PARTIES have caused this Interagency Cooperative
Agreement Amendment to be executed on the date and year opposite their respective signatures.
NOTE: There will be a separate signature page for each entity signing the agreement.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this
ATTEST:
day of , 2018.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
JOSH KERNS, CHAIR
MARY KUNEY, VICE -CHAIR
Ginna Vasquez, AL FRENCH, COMMISSIONER
Clerk of the Board
Page 17 of 24
Exhibit 1
Management Plan
A - PURPOSE
The purpose of this Management Plan ("Plan") is to establish minimum standards for the
management, maintenance and law enforcement along the Spokane River Centennial Trail
("Trail").
B - PARTIES INVOLVED
This Plan is part of the Interagency Cooperative Agreement entered into by the Washington State
Parks and Recreation Commission ("COMMISSION"), the City of Spokane ("SPOKANE"),
Spokane County ("COUNTY") the City of Liberty Lake ("LIBERTY LAKE"), and the City of
Spokane Valley ("SPOKANE VALLEY").
C - GENERAL MANAGEMENT
1. Overall management of the entire 39 -mile length of the Trail will be done
by the COMMISSION through the Riverside State Park Manager's office.
2. All special activities along the Trail corridor will be coordinated through
Riverside State Park via Special Recreation Event permits. Special
activities on the Trail within other jurisdictions will be coordinated by the
COMMISSION, who will notify the parks administrative staff and the law
enforcement department for the affected jurisdiction.
3. The COMMISSION may collect Special Activity Permit fees and may
require an insurance binder with a minimum coverage of $1 million for
parties of 20 or more people, or a damage deposit or a bond.
4. Centennial Trail Use, Approved Activities and Prohibited Activities shall
be established by the Coordinating Council subject to applicable laws and
shall be kept on record with the COMMISSION.
5. The Trail facility will be open to the public on existing COMMISSION
posted hours.
6. Each agency is responsible for obtaining fire protection for their
jurisdiction.
Page 18 of 24
D- GENERAL MAINTENANCE STANDARDS
1. Each agency will be responsible for general maintenance in their
respective areas of the Trail as set forth in "Section 4: Areas of
Jurisdiction" of the Interagency Cooperative Agreement.
2. Corrective action necessary to protect the public will be taken as soon as
possible following report of damage to the jurisdiction responsible.
Temporary emergency Trail closure will be imposed, if necessary, until
hazardous condition is corrected (i.e. fire, flood, washout, leaning trees).
Signs showing appropriate detour routes shall be placed accordingly, and
notification given to the Riverside State Park Manager's office.
Permanent repair or replacement, where not possible due to weather or
other circumstance, will be accomplished subject to the limitations set
forth in "Section 2: Development and Management" of the Interagency
Cooperative Agreement.
3. Subject to the limitations set forth in "Section 2: Development and
Management" of the Interagency Cooperative Agreement, each
jurisdiction will be responsible for routine asphalt maintenance of the Trail
as deemed necessary by the jurisdiction providing the maintenance.
Routine maintenance shall include patching potholes, cutting out and/or
patching large cracks or heaved pavement, sealing smaller cracks in
asphalt with tar and trail shoulder repairs. Shoulder repairs include
placing asphalt on trail edges where old asphalt is cracking and breaking
away and placing gravel along the shoulders where erosion has occurred.
Seal coating of the Trail shall be considered a capital repair. Maintenance
Fund money may be used for routine asphalt repairs with the mutual
agreement of all PARTIES if included within the 6 -year trail capital
improvement plan as outlined in Exhibit 2 — Trail Maintenance Fund.
4. COMMISSION, SPOKANE, LIBERTY LAKE, SPOKANE VALLEY
and COUNTY will strive to use the same standardized amenities and
replacement amenities, including but not limited to signs, benches, picnic
tables, bollards, mile markers and bulletin boards as determined by the
Coordinating Council. The Coordinating Council will develop and may
periodically update a list of options for these standardized amenities. Each
agency shall bear the cost of repair and replacement of amenities as
necessary, subject to the limitations set forth in "Section 3: Development
and Management" of the Interagency Cooperative Agreement.
5. No amenity, other than replacement of existing amenities, shall be placed
along the Trail corridor without the approval of the jurisdiction
responsible for maintenance of that particular stretch of trail corridor.
Page 19 of 24
6. From time to time the COMMISSION may request written documentation
from SPOKANE, LIBERTY LAKE, SPOKANE VALLEY and/or the
COUNTY to verify or otherwise document maintenance work performed
on the Trail as outlined herein.
E- SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE ITEMS
Following is a listing of specific maintenance items with comments as needed:
1. Amenities — interpretive and informational signs, benches, picnic tables,
bollards, water fountains, trash receptacles, mile markers, hitching posts,
rest stations and bulletin boards.
2. Bridges
3. Fencing
4. Guardrail
5. Handrail
6. Litter Control — litter will be picked up as needed to ensure that the Trail
and adjacent buffer areas are kept clean.
7. Mile Markers — both posts and large mile numbers painted on asphalt will
be maintained.
8. Signs — an inventory of replacement signs may be requested.
9. Snow Plowing — no snow plowing will be required on the Trail. Trail head
parking lots may be plowed, depending upon user demand and resource
availability by the jurisdiction responsible.
10. Sweeping — entire Trail length will be swept or blown off as needed to
ensure that the Trail surface is safe for use by bicycles, skates, skate
boards and other non -motorized trail uses.
11. Trail heads including facilities, parking lot and entry road — inspected and
cleaned as needed to ensure that these areas are clean and safe.
12. Vandalism — the PARTIES shall notify local law enforcement and strive to
inform the COMMISSION of incidents of vandalism.
13. Weed Control — in compliance with Spokane County Noxious Weed
Control Board requirements, a control program along the Trail will be
Page 20 of 24
developed and accomplished, the cost borne by the individual jurisdictions
within parameters of the Interagency Cooperative Agreement.
14. Trail shoulders will be mowed or sterilized as needed and overhanging
vegetation cut back for a minimum of two feet on each side of the Trail.
Vegetation will be cut back to maintain line -of -sight necessary for safety
on curves.
F- LAW ENFORCEMENT
1. Primary responsibility for law enforcement/major crimes shall always default
to the underlying government agency as applicable by law, generally
determined upon geographical location and/or type of incident (e.g. County
Sheriff, City Police Department, Federal Bureau of Investigation).
2. In working collaboratively to enhance public safety for Trail users the
PARTIES agree to have their respective law enforcement personnel patrol the
Trail corridor within each PARTIES area of jurisdiction as outlined in Section
4 of the Cooperative Agreement.
a. More specifically, law enforcement / public safety services provided
by the PARTIES shall include community caretaking functions such as
but not limited to patrolling for and/or responding to reports of car
prowls, homeless, loitering, disorderly conduct, indecent exposure,
vandalism, and welfare checks.
b. Patrols in the designated area of jurisdiction / Trail corridor is as
follows: LIBERTY LAKE, with the Liberty Lake City Police; in
SPOKANE, with the Spokane City Police; in SPOKANE VALLEY,
with the Spokane Valley Police; in the COUNTY, with the COUNTY
Parks Ranger and/or the Spokane County Sheriff; and, within
Riverside State Park, with the State Parks Rangers.
3. The COMMISSION will assist within the city and County jurisdictions in
normal park patrol and enforcement along the Trail.
4. Upon request of the COMMISSION, SPOKANE, SPOKANE VALLEY,
LIBERTY LAKE, or the COUNTY will respond as backup during any law
enforcement situation beyond park rule violations.
5. The COMMISSION may submit a request at any time to a respective law
enforcement agency, to provide documentation of all law enforcement
activities related to the Trail to the Riverside State Park office.
6. Law enforcement violations attributable to the Trail are specified through
WAC (Washington Administrative Code), RCW (Revised Code of
Washington) or SMC (Spokane Municipal Code) and include fines if
convicted.
Page 21 of 24
Management Plan Attachment "A"
Maps
Maps shall be developed cooperatively by the PARTIES, periodically updated as needed due to
municipal annexation, trail development/re-routes or other reasons, and kept on file with the
Coordinating Council.
Page 22 of 24
Exhibit 2
Trail Maintenance Fund
A MAINTENANCE FUND FOR THE SPOKANE RIVER CENTENNIAL TRAIL SHALL BE
CREATED.
STATEMENT OF MUTUAL INTEREST AND BENEFIT
WHEREAS, the PARTIES desire to work together to create a Trail Maintenance Fund in
order to preserve the recreational values of the Centennial Trail and to bring additional
recreation and economic value to the area; and
WHEREAS, the Centennial Trail is a valued regional resource linking communities from
Coeur D'Alene, Idaho to Nine Mile Falls; and
WHEREAS, the Trail Maintenance Fund shall become a component of the Interagency
Cooperative Agreement to cooperatively manage and maintain the Trail; and
WHEREAS, the Interagency Cooperative Agreement spells out the obligations of the
PARTIES related to routine maintenance and law enforcement; and
WHEREAS, the Trail is over 20 years old and the maintenance obligations are increasing as
the Trail ages; and
WHEREAS, the Trail is in need of capital repairs to maintain current trail usage;
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual benefits to be derived, the PARTIES
hereby agree to create a Trail Maintenance Fund for the Spokane River Centennial Trail to be
jointly administered by the PARTIES for the maintenance of the Spokane River Centennial
Trail. This fund is primarily intended to address preventative maintenance needs that
PARTIES cannot cover as part of the routine maintenance specified in the Interagency
Cooperative Agreement and to address capital repairs.
I. PARTIES
In addition to the PARTIES to the Interagency Cooperative Agreement, a representative of
the Friends of the Centennial Trail (FCT) shall be invited to participate in a non-voting
capacity when the PARTIES meet to carry out the responsibilities of the Trail Maintenance
Fund outlined herein. FCT is a non-profit corporation under the laws of the state of
Washington, has pledged to contribute to the Trail Maintenance Fund as resources allow, and
has consistently supported the construction and maintenance of the Trail.
II. RESPONSIBILITIES OF ALL PARTIES
All PARTIES to the Interagency Cooperative Agreement shall:
1) Meet not less than twice a year to coordinate the management, operation, and maintenance
activities for the Trail.
Page 23 of 24
2) Discuss upcoming anticipated expenses and maintenance needs.
3) Develop a six (6) year Trail capital improvement plan for utilization of the Trail Maintenance
Fund taking into account capital needs not covered under the terms of the Interagency
Cooperative Agreement, Exhibit 1 - Management Plan.
4) Annually review, update and approve the six (6) year Trail capital improvement plan by an
affirmative vote of not less than four (4) of the five (5) voting members of the Coordinating
Council.
5) Make an annual lump sum payment in the amount of $20,000 to the Trail Maintenance Fund
by February 1 st each year the Interagency Cooperative Agreement is in place.
6) Hereby agree, that all expenditures from the Trail Maintenance Fund shall be approved by an
affirmative vote of not less than four (4) of the five (5) voting members of the Coordinating
Council prior to disbursement.
7) Inspect the Trail within their area of jurisdiction annually to determine maintenance needs in
order to bring these issues to the semi-annual meetings for prioritization and/or funding.
8) Send a representative to each meeting with the authority to vote on spending priorities.
III. SPOKANE COUNTY SHALL:
1) Establish a Trail Maintenance Fund for the collection and disbursement of monies
contributed by the Parties as outlined herein in Section II, Subsection 5.
2) Be responsible for bookkeeping and the disbursement of funds approved by the parties from
the Trail Maintenance Fund.
3) Prepare an Annual Report of the accounting of revenues and expenditures of the Trail
Maintenance Fund.
IV. CONTACTS
The Trail Maintenance Fund shall be administered by the Coordinating Council.
Page 24 of 24
+as`
Monroe Rd
9
0 Farwell Rd
Hastings Q'
T 4-
g3
5',.f
HaW thorne Rd �
6 f
P6'
Seven Seven 0`
Riverside
State
Park
oa
ti d,
oo
Rc,
Wellesley Av
cu cu
esF
Av
Pd
Day -Mt Spokane
mot
a
Bigelow Gulch Rd
Areas of Responsibility for Trail Maintenance
and Law Enforcement Under the
Centennial Trail Interagency Cooperative Agreement
Area of Responsibility
- Washington State Parks
City of Liberty Lake
City of Spokane
City of Spokane Valley
IIIISpokane County
County Parks
MIWashington State Parks
Lakes/Rivers
OSpokane County Boundary
Map Produce: August 2017
8
Miles
MILLWOOD`
z Wellesley Av
rara
Trails Rd
AIRWAY
HEIGHTS
Trent' Rd 90
SPOKANE
Broadway Av VALLEY
LL APPlewayBv Sprague Av '^
cc
16th Av
>
to
n
Mcfaylane-RdI EM
'�
A
32nd Av
IA 315-128 Revision 1
Exhibit 1 - Attachment A
DRAFT
Attendance:
Councilmembers
MINUTES
SPECIAL JOINT MEETING
Spokane Valley City Council
Spokane Valley Lodging Tax Advisory Committee
Spokane Valley City Hall Council Chambers
Spokane Valley, Washington
August 21, 2018
Staff
Rod Higgins, Mayor
Pam Haley, Deputy Mayor
Brandi Peetz, Councilmember
Linda Thompson, Councilmember
Ben Wick, Councilmember
Sam Wood, Councilmember
Arne Woodard, Councilmember
Lodging Tax Committee Members:
Sam Wood, Chair
Lee Cameron, Mirabeau Park Hotel
Colleen Heinselman, Hampton Inn Suites
Gregory Repetti, The Hub
Absent: Scott Peterson, Spokane County Fair Board
Mark Calhoun, City Manager
Erik Lamb, Deputy City attorney
Chelsie Taylor, Finance Director
Mike Stone, Parks & Recreation Director
John Hohman, Deputy City Manager
Cary Driskell, City Attorney
Chaz Bates, Economic Development Specialist
Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk
Mayor Higgins called the meeting to order at 5:00 p.m. and welcomed members of the Lodging Tax
Advisory Committee (LTAC).
ROLL CALL: City Clerk Bainbridge called the roll; all Councilmembers were present.
After Ms. Taylor read the "Council Goals and Priorities for Use of the Initial 2% Lodging Tax," the floor
was opened for discussion.
Mr. Cameron mentioned the 1.3% set-aside funds and Ms. Taylor replied that all these are captured through
the budget process. Mr. Calhoun re -read goal #6 and said with that plus the $500,000, it is anticipated the
fund will have slightly over $1.8 million by the end of 2018; said there have been about seven different
occasions where those funds have been discussed, with the most recent discussion last week; said we had
partnered with the County, Liberty Lake, and the Central Valley School District to look at ball fields, and
at Plantes Ferry and other places and for other projects, which he said has all come to Council several times,
and that during the July 10 Council meeting, Council narrowed that list of ten projects down to three: a
sports plex as noted in the initial study, replacement of a structure at the fairgrounds, and the CenterPlace
West Lawn improvements; he said we will work to gather more information on each of those three to bring
before Council again at a future meeting.
Discussion briefly turned to bonds and how much any particular bond amount would require in payments
to service such a debt. Mr. Cameron asked if it is legal for the LTAC to set aside a fixed annual amount to
be used for bonding. Deputy City Attorney Lamb stated that it would be acceptable, but he would like to
research the process to confirm whether it needs to be an application since it is the LTAC that makes
recommendations from the applications. Mr. Cameron said he was checking with the Attorney General and
said the AG's office said we could do that provided it goes through the process. Councilmember Woodard
Special Joint CounciULTAC Meeting 08-21-2018 Page 1 of 3
Approved by Council:
DRAFT
asked about a bond process and Mr. Lamb said procedurally we would apply for a bond toward a capital
facility; then once the LTAC makes its recommendation and Council approves, then we could go forth on
the bond process. Deputy City Attorney Lamb also stated this process would need to be confirmed with our
bond counsel, and that likely the primary payment would be from LTAC revenues and the secondary from
a city fund to cover any deficit. Mr. Calhoun agreed and said we would identify the LTAC as the primary
source and if there weren't enough funds to make that payment, then the general fund would make up the
difference.
There was discussion about both of the LTAC funds, the 1.3% and the regular 2%, and of the available
amount for the 2019 awards, and Finance Director Taylor mentioned that we also keep some residual funds
for cash flow purposes. Councilmember Wick suggested setting aside some of those funds prior to
advertising so applicants would know exactly how much would be in the "pot" but Deputy Mayor Haley
said since the last several years were good economically speaking, that could change in the future. Mr.
Cameron said that when the State Lodging Association went to the Attorney General, a set aside was
challenged; said they are very serious about goal #2 [Council will emphasize the utilization of funds for
capital expenditures to develop tourism destination facilities or venues within the City of Spokane Valley
as a means of drawing additional visitors to the City (recognizing that this option is limited to facilities
owned by a municipality or public facility district). Council would like to move in the direction of allocating
a majority of lodging taxes toward this purpose.] and in trying to create a real strong tourism presence for
the valley for economic development; he said one would think that by now with two year's history, there
would be an expectation that a set-aside would continue, that a portion of that could be bonded; said he
knows the City ultimately has to make the decision, but he reminded Council that lodging has strongly
purported and encouraged Council to focus on a large sports venue with that 1.3% set-aside; and that the
plan and hope is that 1.3% would grow so it could be applied toward a large sports venue. Mr. Cameron
said that sports is the largest tourism draw in the county; and that it is easier to build on something that
already exists. Mr. Lamb spoke about the change in the law concerning LTAC awards and not like the set-
aside for CenterPlace, there is no indication that this 1.3 would be an annual or ongoing/recurring set aside;
and said to assure or to limit risk of any challenge, the cleanest way would be to have the City apply; that
it might be best to look at it on a percentage basis; that LTAC can weigh-in and Council can approve or
not. Mr. Calhoun noted that if the LTAC came forward and recommended for example, $250,000 for a
bond payment, that would be a bit specific as we don't have a bond yet.
Mr. Lamb said today's meeting is a special meeting so we can only take the action included in the notice,
and it was noticed that the meeting is for discussion purposes. Councilmember Woodard asked if the LTAC
has any disagreements or questions about the goals or priorities, and if not, then we move ahead with the
normal process. Mr. Cameron said concerning the three areas of interest, he would like to recommend that
we have one more joint meeting on this topic, and said the LTAC wants to help Council make the most
informed decision possible; said it is critical to acquire property, and then we can do further due diligence
on how it is funded in the future; based on the past study, we need to define space. Mr. Repetti mentioned
the LTAC process, and said he feels under -informed at this point to talk about large things like a sportsplex,
or replacement of facilities at fairgrounds; said he is not familiar with CenterPlace; said he feels these things
require separate conversations about how the funding works; and again said he doesn't feel informed
enough to have an adequate recommendation at this point. Mr. Calhoun stated that Council has discussed
this seven times, that we need to carry these topics forward and we can let the LTAC know of upcoming
conversations on this topic. Mr. Calhoun again stated that Council has narrowed that ten item list down to
three; and last week's admin report should be given to members of the LTAC, and Ms. Taylor said she will
get copies to members of the LTAC, which includes a copy of the last presentation made to Council, which
includes the two studies, as well as all the financials. There was brief talk about the timing of having another
meeting, but nothing concrete was decided. Councilmember Wood said he would like LTAC's input on
those three projects, and Mayor Higgins mentioned we will have another meeting like this in the future,
Special Joint CounciULTAC Meeting 08-21-2018 Page 2 of 3
Approved by Council:
DRAFT
with Mr. Calhoun adding that it would be good to get an admin report to the joint group so all can weigh-
in at the same time.
It was moved by Deputy Mayor Haley, seconded and unanimously agreed to adjourn. The meeting
adjourned at 5:41 p.m.
ATTEST: L.R. Higgins, Mayor
Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk
Special Joint CounciULTAC Meeting 08-21-2018 Page 3 of 3
Approved by Council:
DRAFT
Attendance:
Councilmembers
MINUTES
SPOKANE VALLEY COUNCIL MEETING
STUDY SESSION
Spokane Valley City Hall Council Chambers
Spokane Valley, Washington
August 21, 2018
Staff
Rod Higgins, Mayor
Pam Haley, Deputy Mayor
Brandi Peetz, Councilmember
Linda Thompson, Councilmember
Ben Wick, Councilmember
Sam Wood, Councilmember
Arne Woodard, Councilmember
Mark Calhoun, City Manager
John Hohman, Deputy City Manager
Cary Driskell, City Attorney
Erik Lamb, Deputy City Attorney
Chelsie Taylor, Finance Director
Bill Helbig, City Engineer
Gloria Mantz, Engineering Manager
Adam Jackson, Planning & Grants Engineer
Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk
Mayor Higgins called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. and then asked for an observance of a moment of
silence for the person who perished in the first on the west end of our city.
ROLL CALL: City Clerk Bainbridge called the roll; all Councilmembers were present.
ACTION ITEMS:
1. Motion Consideration: Consolidated Rail Infrastructure & Safety Improvement Grant (CRISI) — Adam
Jackson
It was moved by Deputy Mayor Haley and seconded to authorize the City Manager or designee to apply
for CRISI Grant funds for the PE phase only for the Pines/BNSF Grade Separation Project with a 50%
City match of $1,246,500. Grants Engineer Jackson explained that this is the second CRISI call for projects
within the last two months; he explained that the difference this time is applicants are now allowed to submit
for preliminary engineering as well as final engineering and construction funding in the same application;
but that the FRA (Federal Railroad Administration) has cautioned us against this option because projects
that haven't completed PE won't likely be in a position to be awarded construction funds; and that because
there are similarities between this and the previous call for projects, the FRA allows applicants to resubmit
their first CRISI application, and that applicants can include a cover letter with the application addressing
minor changes since the first submittal. Mr. Jackson noted the maximum award is 80%, with priority given
to 50% non-federal match applications; and said the 50% City match for this request would be $1,246,500.
Councilmember Wood said based on previous comments, it sounds like the issue hasn't been resolved about
the railroad and tracks, and how many tracks there would be as well as the width between the tracks, and
he asked how we could do engineering on something when we aren't sure of the configuration. City
Engineer Helbig explained that we now have information for the Pines location concerning potential future
tracks and spacing on the tracks so we can now move forward with the design of the Pines project.
Councilmember Wick asked if there is a window in which we must construct; and Mr. Jackson said he
doesn't think so but would have to verify that, and said there was no obligation deadline with the first
submittal. Councilmember Wick said he is aware we have our application submitted to SRTC for right-of-
way funds, and he asked if that counted toward the CRISI program. Mr. Jackson said it could count for this
call for projects if we were to resubmit under the entire project, but for consistency sake and us submitting
a duplicate submittal for the first call; said that first application identified and discussed that there are
challenges in coordinating with the railway and the design of how this configuration would work; so in the
Council Study Session: 08-21-2018 Page 1 of 6
Approved by Council:
DRAFT
first application we focused on design only, so to come in with a second application that differs from that,
puts a kink in the consistency of the project from June to September; he said that right-of-way is an eligible
cost for the full construction phase if we were to resubmit under that track, or multiple tracks including
preliminary engineering, environmental right-of-way, final design and construction; but for our first
submittal of PE only to maintain that, we would not be going after right-of-way. Councilmember Wick
asked if the application to the SRTC includes the full right-of-way fund that we would need, or do we still
have more right-of-way funding needed. Mr. Jackson replied that it is intended to be the full amount given
the amount of information we knew at the time of the SRTC submittal. Councilmember Wick asked
Councilmember Woodard about the potential for us to get right-of-way funding for that [SRTC] program
for this year and the five-year program. Councilmember Woodard said it doesn't look hopeful for this year;
said the committee has not got to the five-year, but has prioritized projects and that is number five or six in
the final prioritization list but it depends on the type of granting available, because the prioritization, if the
funding calls meet #17 best, that would be the one that gets filled; or if there was a right-of-way call and
ours was the top right-of-way one, of course that would be the one put in there, so there's no guarantee if
you are the number one project or number sixteen project where you will end up or when you'll end up
with funding, and he said it depends on the calls for funding or calls for granting. Councilmember Wick
said they already did calls for granting, and Councilmember Woodard said they called for projects to be put
into that list for prioritization, but said he doesn't know if that necessarily takes care of Mr. Jackson's grant
here, and said it doesn't look like we will get the grant this year. Mayor Higgins invited public comment.
Mr. John Harding, Spokane Valley: said he is confused and wants to know if this CRISI grant replaces the
TIGER grant; does it address police, fire, EMS interdiction with the rail system; said that will get worse
with additional lines; asked if we know it will be limited to two and what if commerce continues as it has
been as maybe they'll want four or five, and apparently we can't stop that, or can we; said he has been
doing some counting and he thought they were limited to 120 cars; but the last three to four weeks he has
seen several well over 120; what if lines in two directions are going at the same time, which sometimes
happens and there is an emergency, no one will get through; said the rail system apparently has carte blanche
and that it seems to him we should really look into this and not get the cart before the horse and make sure
we know exactly what the future rail improvements might be. There were no other public comments.
Councilmember Wick said he thinks our Pines project has a good shot being ranked the #1 project in the
state through the FMSIB projects for grade crossings; and he asked if the CRISI grant program focuses just
on grade separations or rail conflicts. Mr. Jackson replied that it does not entirely, and that a big factor with
the federal rails program is inner-city passenger service and safety and improvements to infrastructure. Mr.
Jackson explained that grade crossing improvements would be the minority in terms of how those funds
will be distributed, but it is still an eligible project because it would be improving safety for passenger or
freight rail movements. Councilmember Wick asked if that gives us an advantage since that is used by
Amtrak. Mr. Jackson explained it does not; as in the inner-city definition, we don't have an urban
environment that the truer inner-city would have. Councilmember Wick said he feels we have set up our
application very well for the design phase, and coming in with the 50% match to try to go forward; said it
was a very quick call for projects and was the first round; that he knows it was a limited dollar amount but
isn't sure how many others country -wide are already planning to try to move forward with that and is sure
it will be getting more and more popular; and he would like us to think hard about whether we should
submit the same one over and over again or look at what an application would be for construction funds;
said he doesn't know if there is enough time to do that today but the second call isn't until September, and
that he would like to consider deferring this to another week to give us more time to consider that idea.
Deputy Mayor Haley said it is her understanding that the Federal Rail Administration recommends we do
this; and Mr. Jackson acknowledged that is correct. Mr. Jackson said the CRISI application is very similar
at the federal level from a planning grants engineering perspective; that it is similar to a BUILD or TIGER
grant and is very competitive and very large; but how we set up this application, it is different as it goes
Council Study Session: 08-21-2018 Page 2 of 6
Approved by Council:
DRAFT
above and beyond the BUILD application where it requires you to specify in a statement of work document
included with the application, to provide line -item schedules for the project development; said the idea is
that it is written from the perspective that the applicant has been awarded the project funds, and then Federal
Rail can ask to see the statement of work and if that's what we said we'd do, then that's what we do. Mr.
Jackson explained that the FRA has a line item of what they are signing up for when awarding the funds;
so the warning from the FRA staff was, when you do that at the PE level and you know your project is at
that track for PE only from the previous submittal, you outline that statement of work and are essentially
showing your cards, saying, here's where the project sits today, here are the challenges we have and here's
what we hope your funds can help us work through; by going with that in the first CRISI submittal, and
then turning around and re-creating another statement of work that essentially takes away or acknowledges
those challenges but then adds ten -fold all the other challenges that may exist, and assign dates to the right-
of-way, and from the federal perspective that just introduces more risk which lowers the potential scoring;
so all that convinced staff to keep the same application because it shows our focus and priority to the project,
and we knowledge with the SRTC application that we are trying to piece to the right-of-way; so as we grow
the project, the appeal for full funding gets better, but we aren't quite there yet.
Councilmember Thompson referred to this call where it references `seeks private sector participation' and
she asked what has changed in the application or what addresses that. Mr. Jackson replied that from our
project's perspective, it changes nothing; we haven't gained mitigation fees for the project or private
developer contributions, so that's something where the previous application had an opportunity to inject
that into a table that describes the funding, but this notice specifies a particular section of the document that
really identifies that and shows the sharing of the project; and for ours right now, it doesn't score well in
that area. Vote by Acclamation: In Favor: Mayor Higgins, Deputy Mayor Haley, and Councilmembers
Wood, Woodard, and Peetz. Opposed: Councilmembers Thompson and Wick. Motion carried.
2. Proposed Resolution 18-007 Declaring Property Surplus — Chelsie Taylor
It was moved by Deputy Mayor Haley and seconded to approve Resolution 18-007 declaring real property
surplus. As she had explained earlier, Finance Director Taylor again explained the property and the process
to declare that property surplus, after which Mayor Higgins invited public comment. No comments were
offered. Vote by Acclamation: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed: None. Motion carried.
NON -ACTION ITEMS:
3. Estimated Revenues & Expenditures for 2019 Budget — Chelsie Taylor
Finance Director Taylor went over the information contained in her August 21, 2018 Request for Council
action form, and said this marks the second occasion where Council will discuss the 2019 budget. Via the
PowerPoint presentation, Director Taylor stated the total appropriations in all City Funds, and stated that
our FTE (fulltime equivalent) personnel is proposed at 93.75 for 2019, which she said is an increase of
adding five FTEs and reducing a vacant administrative assistant position to a half-time position. Deputy
City Manager Hohman further explained about the addition of the proposed five FTEs, and that they are
being proposed to meet construction needs on projects that are primarily grant financed, and if needs were
to decrease in the future, the City would begin to eliminate the positions. Mr. Hohman discussed the
proposal for the additional staff, mentioned the current unassigned projects, increased grant requirements,
and increased inspector positions which would allow us to bring our engineering technicians back in out of
the field so they could work on the designs; said that during the winter some of these positions could
supplement or replace the seasonal staff. In response to Councilmember Wick's question, Mr. Hohman
stated we have never had to lay off any staff. Councilmember Wick mentioned he met someone while
attending the AWC Conference in Yakima, who owns an engineering firm in Spokane and they contract
for inspection; said that individual indicated his interest in bidding on something if we were to go out for
bids for road construction inspection, and said they do that with the City of Spokane Mr. Hohman explained
that staff went through that process and there was only one qualified firm and we did retain them; and again
said we have not laid off any staff and are typically very creative and during the last decline in the economy,
Council Study Session: 08-21-2018 Page 3 of 6
Approved by Council:
DRAFT
as staff positions became vacant, we did not fill those positions and would imagine we would look at similar
creative solutions when necessary. City Manager Calhoun added that if possible we would try to engineer
a "soft landing" so we don't have to lay someone off, but given the current and projected workload, said
he'd rather risk having to lay someone off in the future as opposed to not having enough people to do the
work.
Finance Director Taylor then discussed the general fund revenues and expenditures noting that recurring
revenues currently exceed recurring expenditures by about 8.27%; she noted projected fund balance at the
end of 2019 is currently 79.33% of recurring expenditures. Director Taylor also went over other funds such
as the motor vehicle fuel tax revenues, telephone taxes, real estate excise taxes, hotel/motel tax revenues,
stormwater management fees, and aquifer protection area fees. Ms. Taylor briefly discussed challenges
such as the declining revenues in the Street O&M Fund, and balancing the cost of pavement preservation
against other transportation and infrastructure needs; and lastly mentioned upcoming dates for future budget
discussions.
4. 32' Avenue Sidewalk Project Change Order #1 — Gloria Mantz
After Engineering Manager Mantz explained the background of the change order for the 32nd Avenue
Sidewalk Project, Council concurred to place this on the August 28 Consent Agenda.
5. Capital Projects Update — Gloria Mantz
As noted on her August 21, 2018 Request for Council Action and accompanying PowerPoint, Engineering
Manager Mantz updated Council regarding the status of several capital projects including the grade
separation projects, North Sullivan ITS (Intelligent Transportation System) Project, ITS Infill Phase I
Project; and other projects in construction such as Mission Avenue Flora to Barker, Pines and Grace
Intersection Safety Project, Broadway/Argonne/Mullan PCC Intersection Project, and two City-wide
reflective signal backplate projects. Concerning the grade separation project, Councilmember Thompson
asked if we sent a thank you to the congressional delegation thanking them to help move the communication
on the project. Mr. Calhoun said we have not, that it would be appropriate, but that he isn't sure we are
finished yet, adding we could send an interim thank -you, but anticipated we will likely continue working
with them; and agrees an update and a thank you would be a good idea. Councilmember Peetz said that
when she attended some of the National Night Out Parties, several people asked about how to obtain some
of that reflective signalized backing, and she asked how would one go about getting that. Ms. Mantz said
citizens can contact engineering and make a request; that they would not qualify for the ongoing grant
opportunities, but staff will evaluate the requests to see if there is potential to qualify for other grant
opportunities.
6. Park Regulations — Cary Driskell, Mike Stone
City Attorney Driskell explained that it has been several years since the City reviewed the rules governing
use of the parks, and staff has noted several instances where adopted rules are difficult to enforce due to
ambiguity, and said tonight is an opportunity to obtain Council feedback on same draft changes as contained
in the track -change document included in tonight's packet material. After Parks and Recreation Director
Stone went over some of the major changes proposed, Mr. Driskell said a camping definition will also be
included in the near future, but it wasn't quite ready for tonight's agenda. Concerning weapons in the park,
Mr. Driskell noted local jurisdictions are pre-empted from prohibiting firearms, but these provisions
continue to prohibit discharge of firearms, as well as other projections. There was discussion about signs
and people posting circulars about lost pets, etc. and Mr. Driskell said we have to be careful about signs as
we cannot prohibit certain types of signs; said posting notices about lost pets means people would be posting
them on trees or vegetation, which causes harm to the vegetation, results in litter, and that a billboard is not
our vision of a park; in addition, if political signs are posted in parks staff picks them up and asks the owner
to come collect them. It was suggested by several members of Council that the rules should be posted at all
parks so people are aware, with specific mention of prohibiting hitting golf balls, and that alcohol is
Council Study Session: 08-21-2018 Page 4 of 6
Approved by Council:
DRAFT
prohibited. Councilmember Wood mentioned Edgeclift Park and that the canopy area is used a lot and
there is beer drinking, and said he doesn't see a problem with it. Mr. Stone explained that when people rent
the shelters they get a list of the rules and the person requesting to use the shelter must check off that they
won't have alcohol at the event; and he added that most parks don't allow alcohol in the parks; said if it
were openly allowed he is not sure we could keep up with all the challenges that presents and intoxicated
people often lead to destruction and damage in the park; and said he will make sure the rules are posted if
they aren't already.
Councilmember Thompson said she would like to advocate for the use of pifiatas; and if the problem is in
hanging them from trees, people might use two poles or figure out another method as she would like us to
figure out how to allow families to use them; she also asked if there is an option to call ahead if someone
wants to use a metal detector. Director Stone said he would venture a guess that 90% of those who use a
metal detector never talk to the Parks and Recreation Department and staff hardly knows they are there; but
if that is something Council feels is important, we could develop a no -cost permit. Deputy Mayor Haley
also expressed her advocacy for pifiatas and said most people don't hang them in trees, and it is an
inexpensive fun activity. Mr. Stone said staff will work on the language to figure out a way to allow that
and Mr. Driskell said he will also work on language regarding not only pifiatas, but metal detectors.
Councilmember Woodard said littering is also a problem and maybe we could post a schedule of fines. Mr.
Driskell said littering is a class infraction and could result in a fine and court costs of about $112, which is
usually a sufficient disincentive; that most people know not to litter, and the problem with those who do
litter, is catching them in the act; and said he and Mr. Stone will work further on the language and bring
back a draft ordinance mid to late September. Council agreed.
7. Council Salary — Cary Driskell
City Attorney Driskell explained that this came about as a result of a citizen public comment at a previous
Council meeting, concerning Council's compensation. Mr. Driskell explained about the two ways that
Council's pay could be adjusted, and after his explanation and brief discussion, it was Council's consensus
to move forward on the second option, which would be through the use of a salary commission, and to bring
an ordinance back to amend that section of the Municipal Code.
8. Council Budget Goals for 2019 — Mark Calhoun
After City Manager Calhoun read through the individual budget goals for 2019, Council agreed to keep the
goals as written and for goal #7, to include the "Appleway Trail." Councilmember Thompson mentioned
about finding ways in our economic development to support local businesses including to perhaps add
something in our legislative agenda. Mr. Calhoun said that topic will be discussed during next week's
agenda so we can discuss about having language encouraging the state not to impose regulations that hinder
businesses. Mr. Calhoun also noted that once finalized, these goals will be reflected in the budget document
when it comes before Council in mid-September.
9. Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins
Councilmember Woodard asked about sending a letter to Rob Ford in Toronto who fired the CEO of Hydro
One, and the entire Board, to see if we can get an explanation, and if there is anything he knows about
Hydro One that he can share with us for the benefit of our citizens, since the sale of this company will
impact about 10,000 of our homeowners. Mr. Calhoun noted three or four Councilmembers agreed, and he
asked if the intention is to draft a letter for the Mayor's signature to bring back for Council's review and
potential approval, and several Councilmembers concurred.
In light of the CRISI programs and other federal grants, Councilmember Wick suggested another advocacy
trip to Washington, D.C., to get a group to meet with the FRA in Washington, D.C. to express our need and
urgency of our projects to be a higher priority for them. Councilmember Woodard agreed and suggested
perhaps also making a visit with the Secretary of Transportation or others at USDOT. Councilmember Wick
Council Study Session: 08-21-2018 Page 5 of 6
Approved by Council:
DRAFT
suggested planning for a day or two of meetings, and to perhaps extend an invitation to the Chamber to
encourage them to go as well. Mayor Higgins suggested a planning session to lay out the details of such a
trip, and Mr. Calhoun said we can include an admin report on a future agenda to more fully develop this,
including a timeline
10. Council Check-in — Mayor Higgins
Councilmember Thompson said she met with the financial committee with the Board of Health and they
discussed how the services of the Health District expand into communities, and asked that one of the
"Neighborhoods Matter" projects be considered for Spokane Valley; said there has been several
"Neighborhoods Matter" projects in the City of Spokane, and she would like to see that possibility in
Edgeclift or elsewhere in our community; she also mentioned that Todd Miller was selected as a large
jurisdiction DUI Officer of the Year with the Washington Traffic Safety Commission and was honored at
a Mariner's Game last Saturday, and said she will submit an application for a proclamation to honor him
officially.
11. City Manager Comments — Mark Calhoun
Mr. Calhoun had no additional comments.
It was moved by Deputy Mayor Haley, seconded and unanimously agreed to adjourn. The meeting
adjourned at 7:57 p.m.
ATTEST: L.R. Higgins, Mayor
Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk
Council Study Session: 08-21-2018 Page 6 of 6
Approved by Council:
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: September 11, 2018 Department Director Approval:
Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ® new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: First Reading — Proposed Ordinance No. 18-020 relating to business
licensing changes.
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 35A.82.020; RCW 35.22.280; chapter 35.90 RCW; chapter
5.05 SVMC.
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: The City business license code was last amended in
2004. City Council heard an administrative report on September 4, 2018.
BACKGROUND: Pursuant to RCW 35A.82.020, the City is authorized to license all businesses
within the City. Historically, the City has done so through chapter 5.05 SVMC, which requires any
business to obtain a license registration with the City. There are certain exemptions and penalties
for failure to properly register. The City has partnered with the Washington State Department of
Revenue Business Licensing System ("BLS") to administer the City's business licensing. Thus,
business owners submit license applications through the BLS online portal for a state license and
City registration. BLS then provides the information to the City for review and approval. The BLS
ultimately issues the owners a business license with the City's license registration. The City
charges $13 annually for a City license registration. The City fee is in addition to any state
business license fees.
The City has imposed business license registration requirements on businesses for two primary
purposes. First, the license registration ensures that sales taxes from the business are
appropriately distributed to the City of Spokane Valley. Secondly, the City reviews applications
to ensure that the proposed business use is allowed within the applicable zoning. This also
includes ensuring that any proposed home business applies for and receives a home business
permit to ensure that it does not adversely impact the surrounding residential neighborhood.
In 2017, the State Legislature adopted Engrossed House Bill 2005, which is now codified as
chapter 35.90 RCW. Chapter 35.90 RCW requires all cities to adopt, by January 1, 2019, a model
business license ordinance. The model business license ordinance was developed by a large
group of stakeholders with input from cities around the State. The model business license
ordinance specifies a uniform definition of "engaging in business" that identifies what business
does and does not constitute "engaging in business" for purposes of requiring business license
registration. Secondly, the City is required to adopt one of two "threshold" provisions for
businesses located outside of the City that provide business within the City. Specifically, the
threshold provision provides that businesses located outside of the City that have business activity
within the City of less than a specified threshold are either (1) not required to seek business
license registration, or (2) must seek license registration, but cannot be required to pay for such
application. The initial threshold amount has been determined to be $2,000 annual gross income.
Finally, Chapter 35.90 RCW requires cities to either (1) partner with BLS to operate and administer
their business licensing, or (2) use an approved business licensing portal (currently FIIeLocal).
Page 1 of 3
Chapter 35.90 RCW requires BLS partner cities to adopt the model ordinance by a date such that
it will be effective by January 1, 2019. BLS requires 75 days' notice of any changes to a city's
business licensing system, so effectively the City is required to adopt the model ordinance
provisions by October 17, 2018.
In addition to the model ordinance requirements, City staff have reviewed chapter 5.05 SVMC
and determined several updates and changes were necessary to more effectively implement the
City's business license registration system. Due to the number of changes, staff are proposing
to repeal the existing chapter 5.05 SVMC and replace it with a completely new chapter 5.05
SVMC. All of the changes, including the model business license ordinance provisions, are
identified below.
Model Ordinance Provisions — "Engaging in Business."
Pursuant to chapter 35.90 RCW, the City is required to adopt the definition of "engaging
in business" set forth in the model business license ordinance. The City cannot modify the
language or it will be prohibited from licensing any businesses within its City. The definition of
"engaging in business" is a broad definition and includes businesses that may be located outside
of the City, but that clearly conduct business within the City. Historically, that distinction was
sometimes unclear in the prior City code. The model ordinance definition of "engaging in
business" is set forth in proposed SVMC 5.05.010.
Model Ordinance Provisions — Threshold
Pursuant to chapter 35.90, the City is required to adopt one of two specified threshold
provisions. The threshold provisions only apply to businesses based outside of the City. Under
the threshold provisions developed, the minimum gross annual threshold is $2,000. Thus, any
business based outside of the City that conducts business within the City boundaries, but has
business activity under $2,000, would qualify for the selected provision. For such businesses,
the City may choose to either (1) not require a license, or (2) require a license at no cost. Staff
recommends that Council choose option two and require a license at no cost. As a business
grows over time, we ensure that we will capture appropriate sales taxes. Further, seeking a
Spokane Valley license is relatively easy as it may be done online through the BLS portal. The
threshold provision is set forth in proposed SVMC 5.05.020(D).
Application Procedure
Historically, chapter 5.05 SVMC identified the City Clerk as the official responsible for
business licensing. This has been removed. Further, the application process has been clarified
to require a complete application, including payment of fees, prior to processing. Further, the
City's authority to review and approve or deny a business license has been clarified. The criteria
include zoning, home business, or other applicable land use regulations. Finally, the effect of
approval has been specified so as to clarify that approval of a business license does not preclude
the City from enforcing any of its applicable land use, zoning, or development regulations.
Violations and Penalties
The City currently provides for a class 2 civil infraction for violations of chapter 5.05 SVMC.
However, it has never been enforced as such. In lieu of a single penalty provision, the proposed
chapter 5.05 SVMC identifies a procedure for the City to seek suspension or revocation of a
business license and successive increasing penalties that begin as class 1 civil infractions and
Page 2 of 3
escalate to class 3 civil infractions for ongoing violations. Since the process for applying for a
business license registration is very easy and accessible and since the City's fee is so small at
$13, the threat of the penalties allows the City a tool to ensure quick and timely response from
businesses that fail to register. Currently, a class 3 civil infraction is $50, a class 2 civil infraction
is $125, and a class 1 civil infraction is $250.
Appeal
Chapter 5.05 SVMC does not currently identify an appeal procedure. The proposed
changes identify an appeal procedure for determinations for denial, suspension, and revocation
of licenses. Penalties imposed for failure to obtain a license would proceed through a court of
limited jurisdiction like other civil infractions.
During its September 4, 2018 meeting, City Council gave consensus to include the second
threshold option and to keep the threshold at $2,000. The proposed ordinance includes those
provisions.
OPTIONS: Move to advance to a second reading, with or without further amendments.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to advance Ordinance No. 18-020, repealing
existing chapter 5.05 SVMC and adopting a new chapter 5.05 SVMC related to business
licensing, to a second reading.
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: The City currently charges $13 for a City business license
registration. The City received $124,006 in 2017 from business licenses. The City cannot
determine if there will be significant changes from the proposed changes at this time.
STAFF CONTACT: Erik Lamb, Deputy City Attorney
ATTACHMENTS: Proposed Ordinance No. 18-020.
Page 3 of 3
DRAFT
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO. 18-020
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY,
WASHINGTON REPEALING EXISTING CHAPTER 5.05 OF THE SPOKANE VALLEY
MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO BUSINESS LICENSES, ADOPTING A NEW
CHAPTER 5.05 OF THE SPOKANE VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE, AND OTHER
MATTERS RELATED THERETO.
WHEREAS, the City of Spokane Valley (City) is authorized pursuant to RCW 35A.82.020 and
RCW 35.22.280 to license businesses within its boundaries; and
WHEREAS, the City has adopted chapter 5.05 Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) regarding
the licensing of business within the City; and
WHEREAS, in 2017, the Washington State Legislature adopted chapter 35.90 RCW, which
requires the City to (1) adopt a model business license ordinance, (2) adopt a threshold option for certain
businesses located outside of the City, and (3) use either the Washington State Department of Revenue
Business Licensing (BLS) or other authorized licensing portal to administer its business licensing by
January 1, 2019; and
WHEREAS, the City contracts with BLS for administering City business license registrations under
chapter 5.05 SVMC; and
WHEREAS, the City has determined that in addition to the changes required pursuant to chapter
35.90 RCW, chapter 5.05 SVMC requires other updates; and
WHEREAS, the City Council hereby determines that repealing existing chapter 5.05 SVMC and
replacing it with a new chapter 5.05 SVMC to adopt the required model business license ordinance and
other changes proposed by staff is in the best interest of the City and its citizens.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley ordains as follows:
Section 1. Purpose. The purpose of this Ordinance is to repeal existing chapter 5.05 SVMC and replace it
with a new chapter 5.05 SVMC relating to business license requirements.
Section 2. Repeal. Chapter 5.05 SVMC is hereby repealed in its entirety.
Section 3. Adoption. The City Council hereby adopts the following as chapter 5.05 SVMC:
5.05.010 Engaging in business.
A. The term "engaging in business" means commencing, conducting, or continuing in business, and also
the exercise of corporate or franchise powers, as well as liquidating a business when the liquidators thereof
hold themselves out to the public as conducting such business.
B. This section sets forth examples of activities that constitute engaging in business in the City, and
establishes safe harbors for certain of those activities so that a person who meets the criteria may engage in
de minimus business activities in the City without having to pay a business license registration fee. The
activities listed in this section are illustrative only and are not intended to narrow the definition of "engaging
Ordinance 18-020, Business Licensing Update Page 1 of 6
D RAFT
in business" in SVMC 5.05.010(A). If an activity is not listed, whether it constitutes engaging in business
in the City shall be determined by considering all the facts and circumstances and applicable law.
C. Without being all inclusive, any one of the following activities conducted within the City by a person,
or its employee, agent, representative, independent contractor, broker or another acting on its behalf
constitutes engaging in business and requires a person to register and obtain a business license registration.
1. Owning, renting, leasing, maintaining, or having the right to use, or using, tangible personal
property, intangible personal property, or real property permanently or temporarily located in the City.
2. Owning, renting, leasing, using, or maintaining, an office, place of business, or other
establishment in the City.
3. Soliciting sales.
4. Making repairs or providing maintenance or service to real or tangible personal property,
including warranty work and property maintenance.
5. Providing technical assistance or service, including quality control, product inspections,
warranty work, or similar services on or in connection with tangible personal property sold by the person
or on its behalf.
6. Installing, constructing, or supervising installation or construction of, real or tangible personal
property.
7. Soliciting, negotiating, or approving franchise, license, or other similar agreements.
8. Collecting current or delinquent accounts.
9. Picking up and transporting tangible personal property, solid waste, construction debris, or
excavated materials.
10. Providing disinfecting and pest control services, employment and labor pool services, home
nursing care, janitorial services, appraising, landscape architectural services, security system services,
surveying, and real estate services including the listing of homes and managing real property.
11. Rendering professional services such as those provided by accountants, architects, attorneys,
auctioneers, consultants, engineers, professional athletes, barbers, baseball clubs and other sports
organizations, chemists, consultants, psychologists, court reporters, dentists, doctors, detectives, laboratory
operators, teachers, veterinarians.
12. Meeting with customers or potential customers, even when no sales or orders are solicited at
the meetings.
13. Training or recruiting agents, representatives, independent contractors, brokers or others,
domiciled or operating on a job in the City, acting on its behalf, or for customers or potential customers.
14. Investigating, resolving, or otherwise assisting in resolving customer complaints.
15. In-store stocking or manipulating products or goods, sold to and owned by a customer,
regardless of where sale and delivery of the goods took place.
Ordinance 18-020, Business Licensing Update Page 2 of 6
D RAFT
16. Delivering goods in vehicles owned, rented, leased, used, or maintained by the person or
another acting on its behalf.
D. If a person, or its employee, agent, representative, independent contractor, broker or another acting on
the person's behalf, engages in no other activities in or with the City except the following, it need not
register and obtain a business license registration.
1. Meeting with suppliers of goods and services as a customer.
2. Meeting with government representatives in their official capacity, other than those performing
contracting or purchasing functions.
3. Attending meetings, such as board meetings, retreats, seminars, and conferences, or other
meetings wherein the person does not provide training in connection with tangible personal property sold
by the person or on its behalf. This provision does not apply to any board of director member or attendee
engaging in business such as a member of a board of directors who attends a board meeting.
4. Renting tangible or intangible property as a customer when the property is not used in the City.
5. Attending, but not participating in a "trade show" or "multiple vendor events". Such activities
may be subject to other City regulations.
6. Conducting advertising through the mail.
7. Soliciting sales by phone from a location outside the City.
E. A seller located outside the City merely delivering goods into the City by means of common carrier is
not required to register and obtain a business license registration, provided that it engages in no other
business activities in the City. Such activities do not include those in SVMC 5.05.010(D).
The City expressly intends that engaging in business includes any activity sufficient to establish nexus for
purposes of applying the license registration fee under the law and the constitutions of the United States
and the State of Washington. Nexus is presumed to continue as long as the taxpayer benefits from the
activity that constituted the original nexus generating contact or subsequent contacts.
5.05.020 Business license registration required.
A. Every person engaging in business shall register such person's business with the City. License
registration shall include completion of a registration request, payment of any applicable license registration
fees, and receipt of endorsement or approval of the license registration application by the City. If more
than one business is located on a single premises, including residential home-based businesses, separate
license registrations shall be required for each separate business conducted. Businesses with more than one
City location shall register each location separately.
B. Valid License Registration. No person may engage in business in the City or with the City without
first having obtained and being the holder of a valid annual Washington State business license registration,
and a valid annual City license registration.
Ordinance 18-020, Business Licensing Update Page 3 of 6
D RAFT
C. The City Manager is hereby authorized to enter into an agreement with the State of Washington Master
License Service, its successor, or any other entity as allowed by law under which that agency shall accept
and process City business license registration applications.
D. Threshold for Out -of -City Businesses. For purposes of the license registration by this chapter, any
person or business whose annual value of products, gross proceeds of sales, or gross income of the business
in the City is equal to or less than $2,000 and who does not maintain a place of business within the City,
shall submit a business license registration to the City. The threshold does not apply to regulatory license
requirements or activities that require a specialized permit.
5.05.030 Exemptions.
The following services and activities shall be exempt from the provisions of chapter 5.05 SVMC:
A. Delivering newspapers and periodicals.
B. Soliciting orders from retail establishments via telephone, Internet or mail for the delivery and
sale of goods, wares, and merchandise unless the person's place of business is located within the City.
C. Minors engaged in babysitting.
D. The casual sale of items of personal property where the person conducting such sale is not
regularly engaged in the business of selling items of personal property (for example, garage sales, service
agency bake sales).
E. Sales by farmers or gardeners of their own farm products raised and grown exclusively upon
lands owned or occupied by them.
F. Providers of Internet or wireless phone services where the provider operates from premises
located outside the City and the only event occurring within the City is receipt of such goods and services.
G. Temporary craft booths and food booths lasting 10 days or less in any one location.
5.05.040 Application procedure.
A. Application for the business license registration or renewal shall be made in writing to the City upon a
form provided by the City, which may be electronic, and which may be through any agency the City has
contracted with for processing of license registration applications. Business license registrations shall
include a physical address for the business which shall not be a post office box or a mail delivery designation
for addresses associated with a commercial mail receiving agency. Complete applications shall include all
necessary information as set forth on the form, any additional information requested by the City such as
additional information about the nature of the business operations, and complete payment of any applicable
fees.
B. If the applicant is a partnership, the application shall be made by one of the partners; if a corporation, by
one of the officers thereof; if a foreign corporation, partnership or nonresident individual, by the resident
agent or local manager of the corporation, partnership or individual.
C. Home businesses. A business license registration application for a home business shall not be approved
until a home business permit is applied for and received from the City by the applicant.
Ordinance 18-020, Business Licensing Update Page 4 of 6
D RAFT
D. Review. The City shall review each application for completeness and may return any application that
is incomplete. The City may deny and reject any applications that are inconsistent with applicable land use
regulations, including zoning, home business, or other applicable land use regulations. The City shall
provide applicants with a statement as to the reasons for any denial and rejection of an application. In the
event any application is rejected, the City may, but is not required to refund any fees collected.
E. Effect of business license registration. Receipt of a business license registration shall not be deemed or
construed as approval of or right to any particular land use, approval of a particular structure, facility, or
improvement, or approval under any other Code provision. Persons with business license registrations shall
comply with all applicable Code provisions, including but not limited to land use, zoning, environmental,
and building regulations. The City may enforce such provisions regardless of any business license
registration that may have been received by an owner or operator.
5.05.050 Fee.
A. City business license registration shall occur on an annual basis and shall automatically expire one year
from the date of registration or renewal for which the City registration or previous renewal was issued.
B. An annual fee shall be charged for registering a business or businesses and renewing any license
registration. Business license registration fees shall be established by City Council through adoption of a
resolution. The City may impose an additional delinquency fee for any late renewal that is not paid by the
applicable annual renewal due date.
5.05.060 Transfer or sale of business — New registration required.
Upon the sale or transfer of any business, the license registration issued to the prior owner or transferer
shall automatically expire on the date of such sale or transfer and the new owner intending to continue such
business in the City shall apply for a new license registration pursuant to the procedures established by
chapter 5.05 SVMC.
5.05.070 Violation; Penalty.
A. Violation. Failure to comply with any provision herein shall be a violation of chapter 5.05 SVMC. The
City may seek any remedy available by law, including but not limited to suspension or revocation of a
business license registration and imposition of penalties pursuant to SVMC 5.05.070(C).
B. Suspension or revocation. In the event the City determines to suspend or revoke a City business license
registration, it shall issue a determination in writing to the business owner listed on the license registration
stating the basis for such determination, the business owner's rights to appeal, and the effect of the
determination. A business owner shall cease all business operations upon suspension or revocation of a
business license registration. A determination to suspend or revoke a license registration shall not in any
way limit the City's right to any other remedy, including but not limited to assessment of applicable
penalties.
C. Penalty. Any person, firm, or corporation who knowingly violates or fails to comply with any term or
provision of chapter 5.05 SVMC shall be deemed to have committed a civil infraction. A person, firm, or
corporation found to have committed a civil infraction shall be assessed a daily monetary penalty pursuant
to RCW 7.80.120, as adopted or subsequently amended, including any applicable statutory assessment. The
penalties shall be assessed as follows:
Ordinance 18-020, Business Licensing Update Page 5 of 6
D RAFT
1. First offense: Class 3 civil infraction.
2. Second offense arising out of the same facts as the first offense: Class 2 civil infraction.
3. Third offense and any other subsequent offenses arising out of the same facts as the first offense:
Class 1 civil infraction.
5.05.080 Appeal.
A. A person may appeal any (1) determination of a violation of chapter 5.05 SVMC other than violations
associated with the imposition of penalties, which shall be appealed pursuant to SVMC 5.05.080(B), (2)
denial, suspension, or revocation of a City business license registration, or (3) determination that a person
is engaged in business and the person disputes that determination to the City Manager within 14 days of
such determination. In order for an appeal to be considered, the business owner or applicant shall provide
a written statement that describes with particularity the reasons why the City's decision was in error and
the reasons the City Manager should reverse the denial, suspension, or revocation. An appeal shall be
accompanied by payment of any applicable appeal fees to be considered timely. The City Manager shall
review the appeal and issue a written decision to uphold, modify, or reverse the determination within 30
days of receipt of the appeal. The City Manager's decision is the final decision of the City and may be
appealed to the Spokane County Superior Court within 21 days of the date of the City Manager's decision.
B. Appeals of the imposition of penalties shall be made pursuant to chapter 7.80 RCW.
Section 4. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance should be held to
be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality
shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or phrase of this
Ordinance.
Section 5. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective five days after publication of the
Ordinance, or a summary thereof, in the official newspaper of the City.
Adopted this day of , 2018
ATTEST:
Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk
Approved as to Form:
Office of the City Attorney
Date of Publication:
Effective Date:
City of Spokane Valley
L.R. Higgins, Mayor
Ordinance 18-020, Business Licensing Update Page 6 of 6
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: September 11, 2018 Department Director Approval:
Check all that apply: ❑ consent
❑ old business ® new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: First Reading of Proposed Ordinance No. 18-021 amending chapter 2.10 of
the SVMC regarding an independent salary commission.
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: Washington State Constitution Article XXX; RCW 35.21.015; SVMC
2.10.020.
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Adoption of SVMC 2.10.020 in 2006 establishing the
ability of the Mayor to appoint a Salary Commission, with approval of the Council. On August 21, 2018,
City Council heard an administrative report.
BACKGROUND: At the July 17 Council meeting, a citizen expressed concern in the public comment
period about the level of Council compensation, stating it had been many years since this issue had been
addressed. At the July 31 meeting, City Manager Calhoun asked the Council if there was interest in
receiving an administrative report regarding Council compensation, and there were no objections.
There are two ways in which Council pay may be adjusted. First, the Council may adopt a salary
ordinance establishing the new salary. However, pursuant to RCW 35A.13.040, "any increase or
reduction in the compensation attaching to an office shall not become effective until the expiration of the
term then being served by the incumbent: PROVIDED That compensation of councilmembers may not be
increased or diminished after their election nor may the compensation of the mayor be increased or
diminished after the mayor has been chosen by the council." As such, for example, Councilmember
Thompson would not see increased pay under this method until the beginning of a second term if she
chose to run and was re-elected, in 2022. Similarly, for example, Councilmember Woodard would not
see increased pay under this method until the beginning of a third full term if he chose to run and was re-
elected in 2020.
The second way council pay may be adjusted is through the recommendation of a salary commission.
RCW 35.21.015 provides the authority and process by which a city may establish a salary commission.
Under this method, an appointed salary commission would undertake a review of the council and mayor
salaries, analyze what councilmembers for similar jurisdictions are paid, and then make a written report to
the council regarding whether the pay levels should be adjusted and, if so, to what levels. A summary of
the salary commission's report would be published in the official newspaper of the City for two weeks,
with the second publication marking the date as the official date of action for the salary commission. If
there is no referendum petition filed with the City within 30 days of that second publication, the salary
adjustment automatically goes into effect without any action of the Council, on the 31St day. Because the
salary adjustment is made by the salary commission, and not the council, this is not considered an act by
the council to perform a mid-term adjustment, and is thus permitted.
Upon incorporation, the Council's pay was set pursuant to RCW 35A.13.040 at $400 per month, with the
Mayor receiving $500 per month. In 2006, the Council adopted SVMC 2.10.020 establishing the
authority for the Council to appoint a Salary Commission. The Council then appointed a five -member
Commission to a one year term. The Commission met seven times, and submitted a final report
December 4, 2006 which recommended an increase in pay to $750 per month for Councilmembers, and
$975 per month for the Mayor. There was no referendum petition filed with the City within 30 days of
the second publication date, so this recommendation became final and effective without action of the
Council on January 17, 2007.
A copy of the 2006 Independent Salary Commission Final Report is included for additional background,
including the criteria for consideration, and process used in arriving at the recommendation. A staff
member was assigned to assist the Salary Commission in collecting data for its consideration.
A salary commission may be appointed for a period of one year by the Mayor, and confirmed by the
Council. This five -person commission serves without pay, and members shall be residents of the City,
and registered to vote in Spokane County. No officer, official, or employee of the City or any of their
immediate family members may serve on a salary commission.
At the August 21, 2018 City Council meeting, Council indicated a desire to create an independent salary
commission. As discussed at that time, the use of a salary commission requires amendments to chapter
2.10 SVMC. Staff is presenting Proposed Ordinance No. 18-021 to make the necessary amendments to
chapter 2.10 SVMC. After approval of Ordinance No. 18-021, City Council could create the salary
commission and begin the Council salary review process.
OPTIONS: Move to advance Ordinance No. 18-021 to a second reading, with or without amendments.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to advance Ordinance No. 18-021, amending
chapter 2.10 SVMC, to a second reading.
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Unknown at this time.
STAFF CONTACT: Cary Driskell, City Attorney.
ATTACHMENTS: Proposed Ordinance No. 18-021.
2006 Independent Salary Commission Final Report.
DRAFT
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO. 18-021
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY,
WASHINGTON AMENDING CHAPTER 2.10 OF THE SPOKANE VALLEY MUNICIPAL
CODE PERTAINING TO THE CITY COUNCIL SALARY COMMISSION, AND OTHER
MATTERS RELATED THERETO.
WHEREAS, the City of Spokane Valley (City) is authorized pursuant to RCW 35.21.015 to
establish independent salary commissions to set the salaries for City Councilmembers; and
WHEREAS, the City has adopted chapter 2.10 Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) to govern
how City Council salaries are set, including allowing for the creation of an independent salary commission;
and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined it necessary to adopt amendments to chapter 2.10
SVMC relating to the creation, authority, and operation of independent salary commissions.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley ordains as follows:
Section 1. Purpose. The purpose of this Ordinance is to adopt amendments to chapter 2.10 SVMC relating
to the creation, authority, and operation of an independent salary commission.
Section 2. Amendment. Chapter 2.10 SVMC is hereby amended as follows:
2.10.010 Salary levels established.*
A. Council Members. Each city council member shall be entitled to receive a salary of $400.00 per
month, payable on the last day of each calendar month, unless said day is a holiday or weekend, then said
salary shall be paid the Friday before the last day of the month, or such other amount as set by an
independent salary commission.
B. Mayor. The mayor shall be entitled to a salary of $500.00 per month, which is 25 percent greater than
council member salaries, payable on the last day of each calendar month, unless said day is a holiday or
weekend, then said salary shall be paid the Friday before the last day of the month.
C. Adjustment by Independent Salary Commission. If the City's independent salary commission
establishes a salary schedule for the mayor and council members, those salaries will take effect at the
times, in the amounts, and under the conditions established in the schedule as provided by law.
* Code reviser's note: Monthly salary adjustments of $975.00 for mayor and $750.00 for council members
were effective January 17, 2007.
2.10.020 Independent Salary Commission
A. Independent Salary Commission.
1. Creation of Independent Salary Commission. The City may appoint an independent salary
commission for a period of up to one year.Thcrc is hereby established for the City of Spokane Valley an
independent salary commission for a period of one year.*
Ordinance 18-021, Salary Commission Amendments Page 1 of 4
D RAFT
2. Purpose. The purpose of the independent salary commission shall be to review and establish the
salaries of the mayor and the council -members.
3. Composition. The independent salary commission shall consist of five members appointed by
the mayor and confirmed by the city council.
4. Compensation. The independent salary commission shall serve without compensation.
5. Term. The term of appointment is up to one year.
6. Qualifications.
a. Each person appointed to serve as a member of the independent salary commission shall
be a citizen of the United States, a resident of the City of Spokane Valley for at least one year
immediately preceding such appointment and while serving on the independent salary commission,
and a registered voter in Spokane County.
b. No officer, official, or employee of the City or any of their immediate family members
may serve on the independent salary commission. "Immediate family member" as used in this
section means the parents, spouse, siblings, children, or dependent relatives of the officer, official,
or employee, whether or not living in the household of the officer, official, or employee.
7. Operation.
a. The independent salary commission shall elect a chair and vice chair from among its
members. The independent salary commission may establish and adopt rules of procedure for the
efficient and fair conduct of its business.
b. The city manager shall appoint staff and make available supplies and equipment to assist
the independent salary commission in preparation of its reports and records.
c. Any communication from the independent salary commission to any member of the city
council while reviewing the schedule of salaries shall be in writing and made part of the record of
the independent salary commission's proceedings.
d. The independent salary commission shall keep a written record of its proceedings, which
shall be a public record in accordance with state law, and shall actively solicit public comment at
all meetings, which shall be subject to the Open Public Meetings Act, chapter 42.30 RCW.
e. The first meeting of the independent salary commission shall occur no later than 20 days
after the appointments are made by the City CouncilOctober 23, 2006, and the commission shall
review and, if it so determines, amend and file its schedule of salaries with the city clerk within 90
days after appointments are made by the City Council.no later than December /I, 2006
f. Three members of the independent salary commission shall constitute a quorum and the
affirmative vote of three members shall be sufficient for the decision of all matters and the
transaction of all business.
8. Responsibilities. To determine the appropriate rate of compensation, the independent salary
commission shall assess the market rate of compensation for elected city officials and study the relationship
Ordinance 18-021, Salary Commission Amendments Page 2 of 4
D RAFT
of salaries to the duties of the mayor and the city council members. Salaries shall be established by an
affirmative vote of not less than three members.
9. Removal. A member of the independent salary commission may only be removed during the
term of office for cause such as incapacity, incompetence, neglect of duty, or malfeasance in office or for a
disqualifying change of residence.
10. Filing Date — Salary Schedule. The independent salary commission shall file its salary
schedule with the city clerk who will publish the schedule two times, at least one week apart, in the official
newspaper of the City. The second date of publication shall be considered the official filing date of the
salary schedule.
11. Effective Date — Salaries. The independent salary commission's salary schedule shallv,411
become effective in the amounts, at the times, and under the conditions established in the schedule unless
a referendum has been filed pursuant to SVMC 2.10.020(B).in accordance with subsection B of this section.
Once filed, the schedule shall be incorporated into the City budget without further action of the city council
or independent salary commission. Salary adjustments established by the independent salary commission
that result in a salary increase shall beare effective immediately as to all council -members and/or the mayor,
regardless of their terms of office. If the salary adjustment established by the independent salary
commission results in a salary decrease, the decreased salary shall be effective at the commencement of the
incumbent's next subsequent term of office.
B. Referendum.
1. Salary Schedule Subject to Referendum Petition.
a. The independent salary commission's adopted salary schedule shall be subject to
referendum petition by the people of the City. Any such petition shallmust be filed with the city
clerk within 30 days after the official filing date of the salary schedule. In the event of the filing of
a valid referendum petition, the salary increase or decrease shall not go into effect until approved
by a vote of the people.
b. Referendum measures under this section shall be submitted to the voters of the City at
the next following general or municipal election occurring 30 days or more after the petition is
filed, and shall be otherwise governed by the provisions of the Washington State Constitution or
other laws generally applicable to referendum measures.
2. Referendum Statement. A referendum statement on a petition shall be phrased in the following
language:
Should the salary schedule filed with the City Clerk of the City of Spokane Valley by the
Independent Salary Commission on be repealed in its entirety? Your signature on this petition
indicates your vote in favor of repeal of the attached salary schedule in its entirety.
A copy of the salary schedule or ordinance to such referendum petition shall be attached to each
referendum petition for the information of the parties requested to sign such petition.
3. Initiative Provisions Applied to Referendum Process. All state law provisions applicable to the
form of the petition and sufficiency of signatures required for an initiative petition as set forth herein, and
to the submission to the vote of the people as set forth herein, shall apply to a referendum petition and to
the salary schedule sought to be defeated thereby.
Ordinance 18-021, Salary Commission Amendments Page 3 of 4
D RAFT
4. Referendum — Effective Date — Record. If a majority of the number of votes cast on the
referendum oppose the salary schedule or ordinance, such salary schedule or ordinance shall be deemed
repealed following the certification of the vote.
Section 3. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance should be held to
be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality
shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or phrase of this
Ordinance.
Section 4. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective five days after publication of the
Ordinance, or a summary thereof, in the official newspaper of the City.
Adopted this day of , 2018
City of Spokane Valley
ATTEST:
L.R. Higgins, Mayor
Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk
Approved as to Form:
Office of the City Attorney
Date of Publication:
Effective Date:
Ordinance 18-021, Salary Commission Amendments Page 4 of 4
Spokane
��lalley
REcevED
2006
� '
CI y OF SFO YE VALLEY
city c�
11707 E Sprague Ave Suite 106 ♦ Spokane Valley WA 906
509.921.1000 ♦ Fax: 509.921.1008 ♦ cityhall@spokanevalley.org
Memorandum
To: Chris Bainbridge, City Clerk
From: Cary P. Driskell, Deputy City Attorney
CC: Dave Mercier, City Manager
Date: December 4, 2006
Re: 2006 Independent Salary Commission Recommendation
The Spokane Valley 2006 Independent Salary Commission was formed pursuant to
Ordinance 06-021. The purpose of the Commission was to review and establish the
salaries of the Mayor and Council.
According to the Ordinance, the Commission was to begin meeting no later than October
23, 2006, and was to file its schedule of salaries with the City Clerk no later than
December 4, 2006. The Commission met on October 23, November 1, November 8,
November 15, November 20, November 29, and December 4, 2006.
Attached is the final report of the City of Spokane Valley 2006 Independent Salary
Commission. The report includes the salary schedule along with their rationale.
The monthly salary schedule is as follows:
Position
Current Monthly Proposed
Salary Monthly
Salary
Mayor
$500
$975
Councilmember
$400
$750
Please let me know if you have questions.
Cary P. Driskell
Staff Liaison to the Spokane Valley 2006 Independent Salary Commission
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
2006 INDEPENDENT SALARY COMMISSION
Final Report: December 4, 2006
Members:
• Diane Tortorelli, Chair
• Jim Huttenmaier, Vice Chair
• Rick Larned
• Frankie DeWitt
• Gail Stiltner
• Cary P. Driskell, Deputy City Attorney, Staff Liaison
Introduction
The City of Spokane Valley was incorporated effective March 31, 2003. It was the largest incorporation
in Washington State, and the second largest incorporation in the country by population. With a
population of 87,005, it is the seventh largest city in Washington.
Spokane Valley operates under a Council -Manager form of government. The legislative branch is made
up of a seven member Council, with the Mayor chosen by his or her fellow Councilmembers. The City
Council hires a professional City Manager as the City's Chief Executive Officer. He or she is responsible
for the administration of the city, and carrying out the policy directives of the City Council.
According to the state law, upon incorporation of a city of 15,000 or more, the starting salary for council
members is $400, and a councilmember holding the position of mayor shall be entitled to an additional
25%. The Mayor of Spokane Valley receives $500 per month, and the Councilmembers receive $400 per
month. The Spokane Valley City Council adopted this salary schedule at incorporation until they could
form an independent salary commission to provide a more in-depth analysis.
The City Council formed the 2004 Independent Salary Commission to recommend a salary level. That
Commission recommended that the Mayor receive $1,200, the Deputy Mayor receive $1,000, and that the
other five Councilmembers each receive $900 per month. A referendum petition relating to the proposal
was filed with the City pursuant to RCW 35.21.015. The issue was placed before the electorate of the
City at the next general election, and the increase was defeated.
Description of 2006 Independent Salary Commission
On September 19, 2006, the City of Spokane Valley City Council approved Ordinance 06-021, creating a
five -member 2006 Independent Salary Commission. The purpose of the Commission is to review and
establish the salaries of the Mayor and Council.
The City advertised the Commission openings, received applications, and appointed five members. The
term of the Commission is one year, and members serve without compensation.
Pursuant to Ordinance 06-021, the Independent Salary Commission was to begin meeting no later than
October 23, 2006, and was to file its schedule of salaries with the City Clerk no later than December 4,
2006.
The Commission met on October 23, November 1, November 8, November 15, November 20, November
29, and December 4, 2006, and submitted its report on December 4, 2006. With the exception of the
December 4 meeting, the Appendix [II contains a summary of each meeting. The December 4 meeting
summary will be available later from the City clerk.
The Process
The Salary Commission analyzed Mayor and Council salary information compiled by the Association of
Washington Cities of over 250 cities throughout the state. They narrowed their comparison to the twenty
largest cities in the state. Additional analysis led the Commission to again refine its focus to four cities:
Bellevue, Federal Way, Yakima and Kennewick. See Appendix I for more information on comparables.
The Commission members focused on three factors in their deliberation: (1) what council members and
mayors receive in other cities of similar size (market comparison); (2) a thorough understanding of the
Page 2 of 16
work and responsibility of Spokane Valley Councilmembers; and (3) public opinion of what constitutes a
fair salary.
The Commission requested and received information from the Spokane Valley City Council regarding
how many hours each Councilmember spends, on average, each month attending to City business.
The Commission held public meetings, and the City posted the meeting agendas and meeting summaries
on its website. Commission members also compiled a survey that was placed on the City's website with
questions regarding various potential salary levels. See Appendix II for a summary.
The Commission as a whole discussed various salary proposals, and reached consensus on a final salary
schedule.
Council Roles and Responsibilities
Based upon a survey of the Councilmembers, the Commission determined that the average time spent
monthly for the six Councilmembers, excluding the Mayor, is 78 hours. The Mayor averages 100 hours
per month.
There are typically two regular Council meetings and two study sessions per month. These meetings and
study sessions last two to three hours each. In addition to the meeting attendance, the Mayor and
Councilmembers prepare for each meeting by reading the material and sometimes following up with staff
members in advance with questions they may have.
In their role as policy makers for the City, Councilmembers need to stay informed on issues such as
provision of public services; land use and zoning; levels of taxation and spending; and regional, state and
federal legislative proposals.
In addition to these regular commitments, Councilmembers represent the City's interests on various
regional Boards and Commissions. Councilmembers are currently Board members of the Spokane
Transit Authority, the Spokane Regional Transportation Council, the Spokane Regional Health District,
the Convention & Visitors Bureau and the International Trade Alliance. They also represent the City at
the state and national level, with a Council member serving as the Vice President of the Association of
Washington Cities, and two Councilmembers serving on steering committees for the National League of
Cities.
They interact both formally and informally with other elected officials in the region, representing
Spokane Valley's interests on a broader level. Examples of current issues include the future of
wastewater treatment, regional emergency management, potential construction of a jail facility, regional
transportation, and management of region -wide growth.
The responsibilities of the Mayor and Councilmembers also include maintaining contact with the
community. They are active in community organizations and events such as the Spokane Valley
Chamber of Commerce, the Economic Development Council, the Spokane Valley Business Association,
and ValleyFest.
On a periodic basis, they hold Conversations with the Community at various locations around the city.
During the school year, they also visit area high schools to discuss issues of importance to Spokane
Valley's youth. They regularly receive and respond to letters, e-mails and telephone calls.
Page 3 of 16
The Mayor and Councilmembers develop and deliver presentations to community organizations, such as
the Spokane Valley Chamber of Commerce and Kiwanis. They write articles and guest editorials,
conduct press conferences and conduct on -air interviews. They attend ceremonies such as ribbon
cuttings, ground breakings, grand openings, open houses, graduations, and special events at local
elementary schools. At some of these events they are simply in attendance, and at others they are writing
and delivering speeches or acting as master of ceremonies.
In addition to the above responsibilities, the Mayor manages the agenda and presides at Council meetings.
The Deputy Mayor assumes the responsibilities of the Mayor in his or her absence.
Rationale for the Proposal
The City of Spokane Valley adopted the state -mandated $500 per month for the Mayor and $400 per
month for Councilmembers until an independent salary commission could be appointed to review the
amounts. The Commission members uniformly agreed that the amount was too low for the amount of
time elected officials were obliged to devote to the City, and for the responsibility of representing the City
and its residents. However, the Commission believes the basis for the Spokane Valley City Council
should be grounded in a sense of volunteerism, and a desire to serve the community. Every Commission
member expressed appreciation for the work of each member of the City Council.
The Commission recognizes that a Councilmember is never "off-duty." He or she is approached by
citizens not only at official events, but also in his or her everyday life, such as at work, at the grocery
store and at church. The Commission members feel this accessibility is important to the community.
While the Commission didn't feel it was appropriate to propose a full salary, they did feel the City should
compensate its elected officials at a higher rate than they currently receive.
The Commission had a general discussion regarding total compensation, including salary and optional
benefits. The Commission is also aware that the value of the benefits package received, when averaged,
is $569 per month. They weighed this information as they developed the proposal; however, they
recognized that the scope of their work was limited to salary, which does not include benefits.
The salary schedule proposed for the Spokane Valley Mayor and Councilmembers is less than the average
monthly salary for comparable cities (See Appendix I)
The Salary Commission considered three general factors in arriving at its proposal:
1. the amount of time spent, and work performed on behalf of the City, set forth above;
2. a market analysis of salary for mayors and councilmembers in comparable cities in
Washington, set forth in Appendix I;
3. survey results and other public input received directly by Commission members, set forth
in Appendix II. A majority of survey respondents indicated support of a salary increase
at some level.
Page 4 of 16
Salary Schedule Proposal
The Spokane Valley 2006 Independent Salary Commission proposes the following salary schedule for the
City of Spokane Valley Mayor and Councilmembers:
• Position' Current Monthly 'Proposed Monthly ,
SalarSala
Mayor
$500
$975
Councilmember
$400
$750
Pursuant to state law (RCW 35.21.015), this salary schedule shall become effective and incorporated into
the city budge without further action of the City Council or Salary Commission, subject to a referendum
of the people.
Respectfully Subm
//
Diane Tortorelli,
Chair of the Spokane Valley Independent Salary Commission
Page 5 of 16
APPENDIX I: Comparables
Survey of Monthly Salaries
Municipality
Seattle
Spokane
Tacoma
Vancouver
Bellevue
Everett
Spokane
Valley
Federal Way
Kent
Yakima
Bellingham
Kennewick
Lakewood
Renton
Shoreline
Redmond
Auburn
Pasco
Kirkland
Richland
Population*
578,700
201,600
199,600
156,600
117,000
101,100
87,000
86,530
85,650
81,710
73,460
61,770
59,000
58,360
52,830
49,890
48,955
47,610
47,180
44,230
Form of Government Mayor** Councilmembers**
Mayor -Council
Mayor -Council
Council -Manager
Council -Manager
Council -Manager
Mayor -Council
Council -Manager
Council -Manager
Mayor -Council
Council -Manager
Mayor -Council
Council -Manager
Council -Manager
Mayor -Council
Council -Manager
Mayor -Council
Mayor -Council
Council -Manager
Council -Manager
Council -Manager
12,378
11,564
6,276
1,885
1,950
10,742
500
1,375
8,516
1,600
9,285
1,191
900
9,666
875
8,833
9,362
1,100
1,200
1,177
*Official April 1, 2006 Population Estimates: Office of Financial Management
(OFM).
**Source: AWC 2006 Salary
Data
Page 6 of 16
8,675
1,500
2,844
1,260
1,650
1,759
400
1,075
1,146
1,075
1,585
922
700
950
700
850
975
900
900
927
APPENDIX II: Summary of Public Survey Results
1. Given the responsibilities of Councilmembers, how much do you feel is an appropri.
salary?
$400 (no change): 31 43%
$500-$800: 6 8%
$900 -$1200: 16 22%
$1300-$1500: 12 16%
$1600-$2000: 7 10%
TOTAL 72
2. Given the responsibilities of the Mayor, how much do you feel is an appropriate monthly salary?
$500 (no change): 30 42%
$600-$900: 5 7%
$1000-$1300: 7 10%
$1400-$1700: 17 24%
$1800-$2100: 13 18%
TOTAL 72
Page 7 of 16
APPENDIX III: Meeting Summaries
SPOKANE VALLEY INDEPENDENT SALARY COMMISSION
Spokane Valley City Hall
Opportunity Conference Room, 8:30 a.m.
October 23, 2006
Commission Members Present: Staff Present:
Frankie DeWitt Staff Liaison: Cary Driskell, Deputy City Attorney
Jim Huttenmaier Chris Bainbridge, City Clerk
Robert (Rick) Larned
Gail Stiltner
Diane Tortorelli
Meeting Summary:
The meeting began at 8:30 .a.m. There were no members from the public in attendance.
After everyone introduced themselves, Deputy City Attorney Driskell briefly reviewed the contents of the
distributed notebooks, which included today's agenda, copy of signed Ordinance 06-021 creating the
Salary Commission; Powers and Duties of Mayor, Deputy Mayor, and Councilmembers per RCW;
Spokane Valley Municipal Code 2.10 stating the current salary levels of the Mayor and Councilmembers;
and the August 2, 2004, final report of the previous salary commission.
Commission members discussed whether to elect a chair and vice chair now or at the next meeting; they
voiced their preference to have the Salary Commission information included on the City's website,
including meeting schedules and meeting notes; they reviewed Ordinance 06-021 and the report due date
of December 4 was announced. Commission members asked questions about and discussed the process
from the last commission; discussed the importance of public education; and Mr. Driskell briefly
explained the structure of City Hall and the Council/Manager form of government.
It was determined that Mr. Driskell will survey the Mayor and Council as to the amount of time they
spend in the capacity as members of the Council; and the idea was broached to put an interactive survey
on the City's website to put the question to the public concerning a salary increase. Mr. Larned said there
are three things for the commission and the public to consider: are they (Mayor and Council) worth it; can
the City afford it, and is it equitable in the public's mind.
Mr. Driskell will, prior to next week, e-mail the requested information to each Salary Commissioner. Mr.
Driskell will examine the list of comparable cities used last time, and will update that list, and research a
total of twenty cities, comparable in size, and ones which use the Council/Manager form of government.
It was determined that the next meeting will be held Wednesday, November 1, beginning at 4 p.m. in the
Opportunity Conference Room; a tentative further meeting was set for the same time the following week
(November 8), keeping in rnind the date can change if necessary. Ms. DeWitt mentioned there were a
couple recent newspaper articles relative to the Salary Commission and the Council's salary.
The Commission elected Diane Tortorelli as Commission Chair, and Jim Huttenmaier as Vice Chair.
The meeting adjourned at 9:32 p.m.
Page 8 of 16
SPOKANE VALLEY INDEPENDENT SALARY COMMISSION
Spokane Valley City Hall
Opportunity Conference Room, 4:00 p.m.
November 1, 2006
Commission Members Present: Staff Present:'
Diane Tortorelli, Chair Staff Liaison: Cary Driskell, Deputy City Attorney
Jim Huttenmaier, Vice Chair Chris Bainbridge, City Clerk
Gail Stiltner
Commission Members Absent:
Frankie DeWitt
Robert (Rick) Larned
Meeting Summary:
The meeting began at 4:00 p.m. There were no members from the public in attendance.
There was mention of previous news articles that Frankie DeWitt was going to bring. It was also
mentioned that Charlie Plumb of the Valley News Herald may be doing an article soon. Mr. Driskell said
of the three goals mentioned at the last meeting, that the only goal this Commission should focus on is the
actual salary itself, and should not be concerned with whether the City can afford it as Council determines
budget.
Discussion continued on the information from the other cities, whether other councils are part-time or full
time, how much time councilmembers spend on their duties as compared with other cities; and the
difficulty in a strict absolute comparison among all cities. Mr. Driskell also explained the public input
referendum process. Mr. Driskell said he will explore the "cost of living" issue, as the previous Salary
Commission's recommendation included "no automatic annual cost of living increase."
It was determined that Mr. Driskell will ask councilmembers about the number of hours they spend in
their capacity as Councilmembers, and hopes to get that information quickly. Mr. Driskell will also
determine of those twenty cities researched, which cities have part-time councils. It was also determined
to get specific time commitments from councils in Kennewick, Bellevue, Federal Way, and Yakima, and
compare that information with that of our Councilmembers.
The Commission will continue to work on phrasing of the question for the website, and will explore this
further when all commission members are present.
There was consensus that Mr. Driskell contact the media (Spokesman Review and Valley News Herald)
after the November 8 meeting in the hope that they will run a public service announcement directing
citizens to our website so citizens can give us their input.
The meeting adjourned at 4:50 p.m.
Page 9 of 16
SPOKANE VALLEY INDEPENDENT SALARY COMMISSION
Spokane Valley City Hall
Opportunity Conference Room, 4:00 p.m.
November 8, 2006
Commission Members Present: Staff Present:
Diane Tortorelli, Chair Staff Liaison: Cary Driskell, Deputy City Attorney
Frankie DeWitt Chris Bainbridge, City Clerk
Robert (Rick) Larned
Gail Stiltner
Commission Members Absent:
Jim Huttenmaier
Others Present:
Bob Blum
Meeting Summary:
The meeting began at approximately 4:15 p.m. Mr. Bob Blum, member of the public (and member of the
Spokane Valley Planning Commission), was also in attendance.
The following discussion took place:
1. Calculation of benefits as part of councilmember's compensation: determined difficult to compare
exactly internally and with the other four cities (Bellevue, Federal Way, Yakima, Kennewick), as some
discrepancy likely to occur concerning benefits compensation, as number of family members vary, health
benefits may be available but some would chose not to sign up for those benefits. It was determined to
use an average for Spokane Valley councilmembers, that of $549.43 monthly. Mr. Driskell will work on
exact wording for the website.
2. Suggestions for questions for the website: Ms. DeWitt: "Considering the fact that the salary for council
of start-up cities is mandated by state law of $500 for mayor, and $400 for other councilmembers, and the
City of Spokane Valley incorporated as the 8111 largest city in the state, what salary would you recommend
for our councilmembers?" Discussion was also held concerning Mr. Huttenmaier's e-mailed suggestions.
3. Discussion on the process: whether to go forth with the report, or educate the citizens first. It was
determined that questions would be placed on our website as soon as possible to gather citizen feedback.
Mr. Driskell will also contact the City's Public Information Officer Carolbelle Branch, and Charlie Plumb
of the Valley News Herald after today's meeting to discuss a public service announcement. Salary
Commission members were reminded that the report must be completed and filed with the City Clerk by
December 4, 2006. Ms. DeWitt asked if it was appropriate for each salary commissioner to write a letter
to the editor; and Mr. Driskell said that would not be inappropriate.
Concerning other cities' councilmember's salaries, staff will research to see how far down the list we
have to go to find a $400 monthly councilmember salary. Staff will also research to determine the annual
budgets for the other four comparable cities.
It was also determined to add the following for the website information: Prior to Spokane Valley's
incorporation, the average population of a newly incorporated city was ;" and "how long have
you been a resident of the City of Spokane Valley;" and to include the name, phone number and e-mail
address of Chris Bainbridge as the person to send website responses to.
Mr. Driskell will take.all the comments and draft what he understands is to be placed on the website; and
will send to all commission members for input.
Page 10 of 16
Mr. Blum stated that it appears we are readying public information before a salary decision is made; and
perhaps the commission should determine if council should get paid more and if so, how much, then place
the information on the website.
It was determined that the next meeting will be held next Wednesday at 4:15 p.m. in the Opportunity
Conference Room; and to tentatively schedule a subsequent meeting for the following Monday at 4:00
p.m. It was determined that Diane Tortorelli will be the spokesperson for media contact.
There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 5:25 p.m.
Page 11 of 16
SPOKANE VALLEY INDEPENDENT SALARY COMMISSION
Spokane Valley City Hall
Opportunity Conference Room, 4:15 p.m.
November 15, 2006
Commission Members Present: Staff Present:
Diane Tortorelli, Chair Staff Liaison: Cary Driskell, Deputy City Attorney
Frankie DeWitt Chris Bainbridge, City Clerk
Robert (Rick) Larned
Gail Stiltner
Commission Members Absent:
Jim Huttenmaier
Meeting Summary: The meeting began at approximately 4:15 p.m.
Mr. Driskell mentioned as an information item, that approximately a month ago someone asked the
Attorney General if an increase in health benefits is considered an increase in salary and therefore not
allowed. Mr. Driskell explained that the Attorney General issued an opinion that such an increase would
be considered an increase in salary, would not be allowed, and therefore, the official would have to pay
the increased cost. Mr. Driskell said that he and our City Attorney Mike Connelly are working on
language between now and Monday to propose to the AWC (Association of Washington Cities) to
address this issue.
Website survey: (see "Website Survey draft below):
It was moved by Diane Tortorelli and seconded to accept the survey draft. It was then moved by Gail
Stiltner and seconded to amend that motion to include the mention of benefits in the document. After
brief discussion, Commission members voted unanimously to amend the motion. Connnission members
concurred to add a new sentence after the words $400 monthly: "The Spokane Valley City Council
receives those salaries, plus optional benef ts. "
Mayor/Council Work Hours:
Commission members discussed monthly and weekly average council work hours, and came to the
consensus to amend the website survey to include that the Mayor averages 20-25 hours a week; and the
council members each average 15-20 hours a week. Discussion then turned to average monthly salaries
of the cities of Spokane Valley compared to Yakima, Bellevue, Federal Way, and Kennewick, resulting in
an average mayor's salary of $1529; and an average council member's salary of $1180. Discussion then
turned to the issue of if or how to include on the website survey, the survey of monthly council and mayor
salaries of the twenty largest Washington cities. It was determined that a document will be drafted
showing the municipality, population, form of government, and monthly salary of the Mayor and
Councilmembers (along with mention of the source of the information), and to link that document to the
website survey. Commission members concurred to add the new information, by adding the following
sentence "click here to see the salaries of councilmembers of the 20 largest Washington State cities" and
to add that information as a new sentence in the third paragraph, after the word "questions."
Page 12 of 16
SPOKANE VALLEY INDEPENDENT SALARY COMMISSION
Spokane Valley City Hall
Opportunity Conference Room, 4:00 p.m.
November 20, 2006
Commission Members Present: Staff Present:
Diane Tortorelli, Chair Staff Liaison: Cary Driskell, Deputy City Attorney
Frankie DeWitt Carrie Acosta, Deputy City Clerk
Robert (Rick) Lamed
Gail Stiltner
Jim Huttenmaier
Meeting Summary: The meeting began at approximately 4:10 p.m.
Potential Recommendations for Future Salary:
Mr. Driskell discussed the issues City Attorney Connelly researched in regard to increasing council
salaries. He stated one potential option is to have councilmembers pay the cost increase of benefits
themselves or the Salary Commission can include the benefits as part of their salary recommendation.
Discussion was held as to whether benefits are part of the salary or if recommendations on benefits should
be a separate issue. Mr. Driskell explained that the Attorney General's definition of salary varies, some
include benefits and some do not. He further stated the report approved by the Salary Commission should
indicate that discussion of benefits carne up during the meetings, helping to provide full disclosure. Mr.
Driskell explained that the Salary Commission could help clarify its own definition of "salary" by giving
a concise recommendation for the councilmember's salary and include benefit verbiage. Legally the
commission can include terms such as "plus benefits" in their report. The commissioners discussed
keeping the benefits at the current level. It was moved by Jim Huttenmaier and seconded that any salary
recommendation shall include an optional benefits package that is the same as what the City Council
currently receives. Commissioners concurred.
Mr. Driskell will prepare a draft report for the commissioners to review and will e-mail to the
commissioners by Wednesday, November 22, 2006. The draft report will not include specific dollar
amounts.
Commissioners discussed as part of their focus the need for assessing the market value of salary levels
and whether increasing salaries will be acceptable to public opinion and the public perception of whether
the city can afford it. The concern is that the recommendations by the Salary Commission may not be
marketable to the public; however, marketing is not the purpose of the commission. The Salary
Commission was formed to make a fair and equitable recommendation and the final report needs to
justify the numbers recommended by assessing the market value of compensation and area wage rates. A
fixed dollar amount on benefits cannot be included in the report because that amount varies depending on
the benefit option chosen. Mr. Driskell indicated it is not necessary for the report to have a City
fundability comparison showing the cost of salary and benefits now and the additional cost in the overall
package being proposed. The City's budget does not have anything to do with the market rate, but is a
consideration in the assessment of public opinion.
Public Comment:
Bob Blum asked if the Salary Commission is to determine if the City Council gets benefits as part of their
salary. It was determined that the purpose of the Salary Commission is to include benefits language in its
recommendation. The question again came up as to the definitions of salary and compensation. Mr. Blum
Page 13 of 16
questioned if benefits should be recommended by this Salary Commission or if they should just discuss
the salary without including benefits. He also asked if the proposed salary increase would be retroactive.
Good of the Order:
The survey ends Thursday, November 28, 2006 at 4:00 p.m.
The next meeting will be held Wednesday, November 29, 2006 at 3:30 p.m.
The final meeting will be Monday, December 4, 2006 at 4:00 p.m. to adopt the report.
The meeting adjourned at 5:10 p.m.
Page 14 of 16
SPOKANE VALLEY INDEPENDENT SALARY COMMISSION
Spokane Valley City Hall, Opportunity Conference Room
November 29, 2006 4:00 p.m.
Commission Members Present:
Diane Tortorelli, Chair
Jim Huttenmaier, Vice Chair
Frankie DeWitt
Robert (Rick) Larned
Gail Stiltner
Staff Present:
Staff Liaison: Cary Driskell, Deputy City Attorney
Chris Bainbridge, City Clerk
Others: Bob Blum, Citizen
Meeting Summary: The meeting began at approximately 4:10 p.m.
Call for Public Comments: No comments were offered.
Discussion of issues:
Salary Recommendation: The results of the website survey were reviewed and discussed. Discussion
included the process once the report is finalized; leaving the salary as is or making an increase, and if an
increase, how large; that survey results indicated a majority agreed to an increase; and that commission
members realize that this survey is only one way to get some public input and is only one factor in their
deliberations on the matter.
It was moved by Mr. Huttenmaier and seconded, that the salary commission recommend that the mayor's
salary be increased to $1100 monthly and the salary for the councilmembers be increased to $900
monthly. Discussion on the motion included the need for an acceptable range; other budget implications,
and the service to the public; to make a salary fair and equitable for what the councilmembers do; the
public's perspective of what these councilmembers do; salaries for other councils of comparable cities;
that a majority of those responding to the survey were in favor of an increase; and whether there should
be a differentiation in the Deputy Mayor's salary. Mr. Huttenmaier called for the question. Vote on the
motion to increase the mayor's monthly salary to $1100 and the monthly councilmembers salary to $900:
In favor: Jim Huttenmaier, Diane Tortorelli. Opposed: Frankie DeWitt, Gail Stiltner, and Rick Larned
Motion failed.
After further discussion, it was moved by Ms. Stiltner and seconded, to set the mayor's monthly salary at
$975 and the councilmember's monthly salary at $750. After discussion on whether to have a separate
salary recommendation for the deputy mayor, it was the Commission's consensus to keep the salary at the
two levels: mayor and councilmembers. Vote on the motion: In favor: Frankie DeWitt, Gail Stiliner, Rick
Larned. Opposed: Diane Tortorelli, Jim Huttenmaier. Motion passed.
Report Discussion: Using the previous commission's report as a base, it was the Commission's
consensus to make the following changes:
Introduction; third paragraph, add: "According to the state laws on incorporation, for cities of 15,000 or
above, the starting salary for council is $400 per month and the mayor receives $500 per month."
Introduction, third paragraph, last sentence, add the words "at incorporation" after the word salary.
Before the "Description of the Commission" add a discussion on the history of the first salary
commission, including what was recommended and how that progressed. [Mr. Driskell will add the
appropriate language.]
Page 15 of 16
Rationale for the proposal: first sentence, change the word "declared" to "Mandated."
Rationale for the proposal: delete the sentence: "In many cases, this meant that Councilmembers were
paid in effect less than half the minimum wage."
Rationale for the proposal: add to the sentence "The Commission members uniformly agreed that the
amount was too !ow for the amount of time elected officials were obliged to devote to the city" — and for
the responsibility of representing the City and its residents.
Council Roles and Responsibilities: add to the first paragraph: "Based upon a survey of the council
members, the salary commission determined that the monthly average time spent for the six
Councilmembers, excluding the Mayor, is 78 hours. The Mayor averages 100 hours per month.
Council Roles and Responsibilities: Paragraph 4, In addition to these regular commitments, omit the
words "for instance" in the second sentence.
Page 4, Rationale for the proposal: omit the second paragraph.
Rationale for the proposal, third paragraph: change the second sentence to read: However, they believe
the basis for the Spokane Valley Council should be grounded in a sense of volunteerism and a desire to
serve the community.
Rational for the proposal, add: The Commission had a general discussion about total compensation which
includes salary and optional benefits. The commission was also aware that the average benefit package
for each councilmember is $569 per month. They weighed this information as they developed the
proposal; however, they recognize that the scope of their work was limited to the salary, which does not
include benefits.
Page 5 — top paragraph, change the word "stipend" to "rate."
Page 4, bottom of the page, last sentence, omit "and want it to continue."
Top of page 5: "every day" should be one word.
Page 5, paragraph beginning "Looking at the ten comparable cities," omit "the ten," omit "deputy
mayor," and omit the last two sentences.
There was also consensus to include a summary in the rationale, that this rationale is based on the amount
of time spent (scope of activities) in their (council and mayor) duties of representing the city; after
looking at comparable communities around the state, after a survey and examination of the survey results
which showed that the majority favored an increase; and that public input was also gained by individual
commission members talking to members of the public.
It was also determined that the survey results to include in the final report will only include the first two
questions.
The next and final meeting will be held Monday, December 4 in the Opportunity Conference Room, at
3:00 p.m. The meeting adjourned at 5:35 p.m.
Page 16 of 16
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: September 11, 2018 Department Director Approval:
Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ® new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Motion Consideration - Glenrose and Central Park Watersheds Flood
Study
GOVERNING LEGISLATION:
• Chapter 21.30 Spokane Valley Municipal Code;
• Code of Federal Regulations, Title 44: Emergency Management and Assistance:
• Chapter 1, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Department of Homeland Security
• Part 60: Criteria for Land Management and Use
• Part 65: Identification and Mapping of Special Hazard Areas
• Part 70: Procedure for Map Correction
• Part 72: Procedures and Fees for Processing Map Changes
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN:
• September 6, 2016: Project was presented as an informational item included in the 2017-
2022 Stormwater Capital Improvement Plan
• September 13, 2016 Admin Report 2017-2022 Stormwater Capital Improvement Plan
• September 27, 2016, Motion passed to approve the 2017-2022 Stormwater Capital
Improvement Plan
• September 4, 2018, Admin Report
PURPOSE:
The Glenrose and Central Park watersheds in the southwest corner of the City include FEMA
Special Flood Hazard Areas (100 -year floodplains) designated as Zone A's. These Zone A
floodplains were not delineated using rigorous scientific methods and so do not have water flow
information, water surface elevations and, in many places do not have accurate floodplain
boundaries. These deficiencies have created the following problems which this proposed study
plans to address:
• Due to a lack of water flow information, when citizens who are shown to be in a floodplain
need water surface elevations for filling out FEMA's elevation certificates or locating finished
floors in new construction, we have been estimating these elevations using flood flows from
a draft watershed study performed by Spokane County in 2002. It is believed these flows
are very conservative resulting in estimated water surface elevations that could be much
higher than they actually are, causing flood risks to be over-estimated and finished floors to
be higher than needed. This study will provide accurate flood water surface elevations.
• FEMA flood insurance is rated by risk level. Without accurate flood water surface elevations,
people who have to pay flood insurance can't get accurately rated insurance. These
customers could be paying too much for their insurance because the Base Flood Elevations
could be too high, estimating the risk level to be higher than it actually is.
• Due to inaccurate flood boundaries, the flood risk in these basins is not correctly portrayed.
It is estimated that up to 20 properties are shown to be in floodplains that actually are not
and thus are unnecessarily paying for flood insurance. Also, there are properties that have
floodplains on them that could be too large thus overly encumbering the property. Lastly, it is
possible that there are properties which could really be in a flood hazard area but are not
shown in one and so do not have needed flood insurance. This study will provide accurate
floodplain boundaries.
• The lack of accurate and official flood information also complicates development because
our floodplain regulations require subdivisions proposed on parcels with floodplains to
include water surface elevations. This study will provide those water surface elevations.
Due to these issues, the floodplains are proposed to be studied and remapped.
PROJECT HISTORY:
• June 2009: City met with FEMA representatives during which the Glenrose channel was
identified as needing to be remapped.
• September 2016: This project was presented and approved by the City Council as part of
the Stormwater CIP.
• June 2017: City published Request for Qualifications (RFQ) for the Glenrose & Central Park
Floodplain Delineation and received 3 Statements of Qualifications (SOQ).
• August 2017: Project selection committee (City of Spokane, Spokane County and Spokane
Valley) reviewed and scored SOQs and selected the most qualified consultant.
• July 2018: Consultant's Scope of Work, Cost, and proposed Schedule were reviewed and
accepted.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Seeking Council consensus to award the Consultant
Contract.
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Anticipated funding timeline - project expected to take 5 or
more years to complete, funded through 402 Stormwater Utility:
o Year 2018 $50,000
o Year 2019 $76,500
o Year 2020 $42,700
o Year 2021 $62,000
o Year 2022+ $30,700
$261,900 over the anticipated 5+ year study
STAFF CONTACT:
• Henry Allen, Senior Engineer
• Deanna Horton, Admin Assistant, Certified Floodplain Manager
ATTACHMENTS:
• PowerPoint presentation
• Consultant Contract
1
Glenrose-Central Park Watersheds
FLOOD
INSURANCE
STUDY
Slide #1
September 11, 2018
September 11, 2018
Henry Allen, PE, Senior Engineer
Deanna Horton, Admin Assistant, CFM
Watersheds
Glenrose
9 square miles
Central Park
3.3 square miles
Slide #2
September 11, 2018
Spokane
ood
Spokane Valley
Liberty Lake
Glenrose
Basin
Spokane County
Legend
Spokane Valley Border
Municipal Boundaries
Q Glenrose & Central Park Basins
Flow Patterns
Glenrose -
Generally north
Central Park -
Generally northwest
Flows join at
Flood Hazard
Special Flood Hazard
Area, SFHA (100 -yr)
Zone A (Approximate)
Slide #3
September 11, 2018
Legend
�.lunicipal Boundaries
Mate rsh ads
GLENROSE
M CENTRAL PARK
SF HA
A
c nrrar.=
Pack
Basin
FEMA Map
Identified
Floodplains
Zone A
(100 -year)
Zone X
(500 -year)
Slide #4
September 11, 2018
Z
41F1 •V EhV'
ZONE X
24
i}H
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
530342
Central Park
141)1
AF E
FEVLD
4n
AiiErajt
17111
Glenrose
E +li
ME %K.
JOINS PANEL
FEMA Map Issues
Actual topography suggests
split doesn't occur but rather
all flow goes northeast
Impossible flood depths,
boundaries not accurate
Zone A doesn't have flood
elevations which are required
for above -floor elevations,
flood risk determination, and
flood insurance premiums.
Slide #5
September 11, 2018
30 Foot
Elev. Diff
Data Issues
No official flood flows. When needed, use flows from the draft
Glenrose/Central Park Stormwater Management Plan (Sp. Co.
2002). In plan, calculated 100 -year flow for Glenrose = 454 cubic
feet per second = 70 bathtubs per second
100 -year flow very conservative, calculations do not take into
account detention basins, retention basins or the hundreds of
drywells in the basin
Also, the Stormwater Management Plan states (page 3-1):
"Stormwater runoff in the Glenrose and Central Park
Watersheds runs off of property and hillsides, ponds in low-lying
areas and infiltrates into the ground. Over much of the
watershed during intense storms or during snowmelt, localized
flooding does occur, however, large flood flows, with
contributions from all parts of the watershed does not occur."
Slide #6
September 11, 2018
Proposed Project
Detailed analysis & mapping of the Glenrose and Central Park flood areas
Project to result in a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) from FEMA
LOMR is when the floodplain boundaries are officially revised
Slide #7
September 11, 2018
Spokane
�sValley
Project History
June 2009: City met with FEMA representatives during which the Glenrose
channel was identified as needing to be remapped
September 2016: Project was presented and approved as part of the
Stormwater CIP (Cost = $150,000, Time to Complete = 3 years)
June 2017: Published Request For Qualifications (RFQ) for the Glenrose &
Central Park Floodplain Delineation; Received 3 Statements of Qualifications
(SOQ)
August 2017: Selection committee (City of Spokane, Spokane County and
Spokane Valley) reviewed and scored SOQs and selected most qualified
consultant
July 2018: Consultant's Scope of Work was accepted; many reviews and
revisions (Cost = $262,000, Time to Complete = 5+ years)
Slide #8
September 11, 2018
Spokane
.0.10Valley
Key Changes: 2016 — 2018
Based on input from Spokane County and City of Spokane (both
experienced with flood studies), increased hours on several tasks
Requested more thorough research and field work resulting in better
documented and, possibly, lower flood flows into the City of Spokane
Valley
Use of 2018 costs rather than 2016 costs
Based on other projects, increased project life from 3 years to 5+ years
Consultant will take lead role in project management
Consultant utilizing a local firm to conduct public meetings and outreach
Slide #9
September 11, 2018
Spokane
ii Valley
Anticipated Study Progression
AMTIIiii
2018 Data collection and review
Infiltration testing (ponds, drywells)
Cross section and structure survey
2019 Kick-off meeting with site visit and reconnaissance
Open house public meeting presenting project
Topographic data development
Data collection summarization and jurisdiction coordination
Hydrologic analysis and second site visit
2020 Hydraulic analysis
Public meeting presenting hydrology and initial hydraulic results
2021 Develop floodplain maps
Finalize hydrologic and hydraulic analyses
Public meeting concerning maps
Initial submittal to FEMA
Develop flood mitigation recommendations
2022+ Cycles of submittals to FEMA and revisions based on their review comments
Hydrology model training for engineers and jurisdictions
2018+ Coordination meetings, project management
Slide #10
September 11, 2018
Questions?
Seeking Council
consensus to award
the Consultant
contract
Slide #11
September 11, 2018
Spokane
Spokane Valley
Liberty Lake
Spokane County
Legend
Spokane Valley Border
Municipal Boundaries
Glenrose & Central Park Basins
AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
WEST Consultants, Inc.
Glenrose and Central Park Basins
Floodplain Delineation
Contract No. 18.
THIS AGREEMENT is made by and between the City of Spokane Valley, a code City of the State of
Washington, hereinafter "City" and WEST Consultants, Inc., 11ere init Iter "Consultant," jointly referred to as
"Parties."
IN CONSIDERATION of the terms and conditions contained herein, the Parties agree as follows:
1. Work to Be Performed. Consultant shall provide all labor, services, and material to satisfactorily complete
the Scope of Services, attached as Exhibit A.
A. Administration. The City Manager or designee shall administer and be the primary contact for
Consultant. Prior to commencement of work, Consultant shall contact the City Manager or designee
to review the Scope of Services, schedule, and date of completion. Upon notice from the City
Manager or designee, Consultant shall commence work, perform the requested tasks in the Scope of
Services, stop work, and promptly cure any failure in performance under this Agreement.
B. Representations. City has relied upon the qualifications of Consultant in entering into this
Agreement. By execution of this Agreement, Consultant represents it possesses the ability, skill, and
resources necessary to perform the work and is familiar with all current laws, rules, and regulations
which reasonably relate to the Scope of Services, No substitutions of agreed-upon personnel shall be
made without the prior written consent of City.
Consultant represents that the compensation as stated in paragraph 3 is adequate and sufficient for the
timely provision of all professional services required to complete the Scope of Services under this
Agreement.
Consultant shall be responsible for the technical accuracy of its services and documents resulting
therefrom, and City shall not be responsible for discovering deficiencies therein. Consultant shall
correct such deficiencies without additional compensation except to the extent such action is directly
attributable to deficiencies in City -furnished information.
C. Standard of Care. Consultant shall exercise the degree of skill and diligence normally employed by
professional consultants engaged in the same profession, and performing the same or similar services
at the time such services are performed.
D. Modifications. City may modify this Agreement and order changes in the work whenever
necessary or advisable. Consultant shall accept modifications when ordered in writing by the City
Manager or designee, so long as the additional work is within the scope of Consultant's area of
practice. Compensation for such modifications or changes shall be as mutually agreed between the
Parties. Consultant shall make such revisions in the work as are necessary to correct errors or
omissions appearing therein when required to do so by City without additional compensation.
2. Term of Contract. This Agreement shall be in full force and effect upon execution and shall remain in
effect until completion of all contractual requirements set forth in the Scope of Services have been met as
Agreement for Professional services (with professional Lability coverage) Page 1 of 6
determined by City. The project is anticipated to take at least five years to complete.
Either Party may terminate this Agreement for material breach after providing the other Party with at least 10
days' prior notice and an opportunity to cure the breach. City may, in addition, terminate this Agreement for
any reason by 10 days' written notice to Consultant. In the event of termination without breach, City shall pay
Consultant for all work previously authorized and satisfactorily performed prior to the termination date.
3. Compensation. City agrees to pay Consultant no more than $262,000, (which includes Washington State
Sales Tax if any is app I icnb le) as full compensation for everything done under this Agreement, as set forth in
Exhibit B. Consultant shall not perform any extra, further, or additional services for which it will request
additional compensation from C icy without a prior written agreement For such services and payment therefore.
The Parties may agree to piiiject change requests to amend the Scope of Services and compensation amount(s)
as provided in Exhibit A and Exhibit B.
4. Payment. Consultant shall be paid monthly upon presentation of an invoice to City. Applications for
payment shall be sent to the City Finance Department at the below -stated address.
City reserves the right to withhold payment under this Agreement for that portion of the work (if any) which is
determined in the reasonable judgment of the City Manager or designee to be noncompliant with the Scope of
Services, City standards, City Code, and federal or state standards.
5. Notice. Notices other than applications for payment shall be given in writing as follows:
TO Tl -IE CITY:
Name: Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk
Phone: (509) 720-5000
Address: 10210 East Sprague Avenue
Spokane Valley, WA 99206
TO THE CONSULTANT:
Name: Henry Hu, VP/Sr. Project Manager
Phone: (425) 646-8806
Address: 12509 Bel -Red Road, Ste. 100
Bellevue, WA 98005
6. Applicable Laws and Standards. The Parties, in the performance ofthis Agreement, agree to comply with
all applicable federal, state, and local laws and regulations. Consultant warrants that its designs, construction
documents, and services shall conform to all federal, state, and Local statutes and regulations.
7. Certification Recardini Debarment, Suspension, and Other Responsibility Matters -- Primary
Covered Transactions.
A. By executing this Agreement, the Consultant certifies to the best of its knowledge and belief that it
and its principals:
I. Are not presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or
voluntarily excluded from covered transactions by any federal department or agency;
2. Have not within a three-year period preceding this proposal been convicted of or had a
civil judgment rendered against thorn for commission of fraud or a criminal offense in
connection with obtaining, attempting to obtain, or performing a public (federal, state, or
local) transaction or contract under a public transaction; violation of federal or state antitrust
statutes or commission of embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of
records, making false statements, or receiving stolen properly;
3. Are not presently indicted for or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a governmental
entity (federal, state, or local) with commission of any of the offenses enumerated in
Agreement for :Professional Services (with professional liability coverage) Page 2 of 6
paragraph (A)(2) of this certification; and
4. Have not within a three-year period preceding this application/proposal had one or more
public transactions (federal, state, or local) terminated for cause or default.
B. Where the prospective primary participant is unable to certify to any of the statements in this
certification, such prospective participant shall attach an explanation to this Agreement,
$. Relationship of the Parties. It is understood and agreed that Consultant shall be an independent contractor
and not the agent or employee of City, that City is interested in only the results to be achieved, and that the
right to control the particular manner, method, and means in which the services are performed is solely within
the discretion of Consultant. Any and all employees who provide services to City under this Agreement shall
be deemed employees solely of Consultant. The Consultant shall be solely responsible for the conduct and
actions of all its employees under this Agreement and any liability that may attach thereto.
9. Ownership of Documents. All drawings, plans, specifications, and other related documents prepared by
Consultant under this Agreement are and shall be the property of City, and may be subject to disclosure
pursuant to chapter 42.56 RCW or other applicable public record laws. The written, graphic, mapped,
photographic, or visual documents prepared by Consultant under this Agreement shall, unless otherwise
provided, be deemed the property of City. City shall be permitted to retain these documents, including
reproducible camera-ready originals of reports, reproduction quality mylars of maps, and copies in the form of
computer files, for the City's use. City shall have unrestricted authority to publish, disclose, distribute, and
otherwise use, in whole or in part, any reports, data, drawings, images, or other material prepared under this
Agreement, provided that Consultant shall have no liability for the use of Consultant's work product outside of
the scope of its intended purpose.
10. Records. The City or State Auditor or any of their representatives shall have full access to and the right to
examine during normal business hours all of Consultant's records with respect to all matters covered in this
Agreement. Such representatives shall be permitted to audit, exainine, make excerpts or transcripts from such
records, and to make audits of all contracts, invoices, materials, payrolls, and record of matters covered by this
Agreement for a period of three years from the date final payment is made hereunder.
11. Insurance. Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of the Agreement, insurance against
claims for injuries to persons or damage to property which may arise from or in connection with the
performance of the work hereunder by Consultant, its agents, representatives, employees, or subcontractors.
A. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Consultant shall obtain insurance of the types described below:
1. Automobile liability insurance covering all owned, non -owned, hired, and leased vehicles.
Coverage shall be written on Insurance Services Office (ISO) form CA 00 01 or a substitute
form providing equivalent liability coverage.
2. Commercial general liability insurance shall be at least as broad as ISO occurrence form
CG 00 01 and shall cover liability arising from premises, operations, stop -gap independent
contractors and personal injury, and advertising injury. City shall be named as an additional
insured under Consultant's commercial general liability insurance policy with respect to the
work performed for the City using an additional insured endorsement at least as broad as ISO
CG2026.
3. Worlcers' compensation coverage as required by the industrial insurance laws of the State
of Washington.
Agreement for Professional Services (with professional liability coverage) Page 3 of 6
4. Professional liability insurance appropriate to Consultant's profession.
B. Minimum Amounts of Insurance, Consultant shall maintain the following insurance limits:
1. Automobile liability insurance with a minimum combined single limit for bodily injury and
property damage of no less than $1,000,000 per accident.
2. Commercial general liability insurance shall be written with limits no less than $1,000,000
for each occurrence, and $2,000,000 for general aggregate.
3. Professional liability insurance shall be written with limits no less than $1,000,000 per
claim and $1,000,000 policy aggregate limit.
C. Other Insurance Provisions. The policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following
provisions for automobile liability, professional liability, and commercial general liability insurance:
1. Consultant's insurance coverage shall be prirnary insurance with respect to the City. Any
insurance, self-insurance, or insurance pool coverage maintained by City shall be in excess of
Consultant's insurance and shall not contribute with it.
2. Consultant shall fax or send electronically in .pdf format a copy of insurer's cancellation
notice within two business days of receipt by Consultant.
3. If Consultant maintains higher insurance limits than the minimums shown above, City shall
be insured for the full available limits ofcomtnercial general and excess or umbrella liability
maintained by Consultant, irrespective of whether such limits maintained by Consultant are
greater than those required by this Agreement or whether any certificate of insurance
furnished to the City evidences Iimits of liability lower than those maintained by Consultant.
4. Failure on the part of Consultant to maintain the insurance as required shall constitute a
material breach of the Agreement, upon which the City may, after giving at least five business
days' notice to Consultant to correct the breach, immediately terminate the Agreement, or at
its sole discretion, procure or renew such insurance and pay any and all premiums in
connection therewith, with any sums so expended to be repaid to City on demand, or at the
sole discretion of the City, offset against funds due Consultant from the City.
D. Acceptability of Insurers, Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best rating of
not less than AMI.
E. Evidence of Coverage. As evidence of the insurance coverages required by this Agreement,
Consultant shall furnish acceptable insurance certificates to the City Clerk at the time Consultant
returns the signed Agreement, which shall be Exhibit C. The certificate shall specify all of the parties
who are additional insureds, and shall include applicable policy endorsements, and the deduction or
retention level_ Insuring companies or entities are subject to City acceptance. If requested, complete
copies of insurance policies shall be provided to City Consultant shall be financially responsible for
all pertinent deductibles, self-insured retention:-, ncl/ i self-insurance.
12. Indemnification and Hold Harmless. Consultant shall, at its sole expense, defend, indemnify, and hold
harmless City and its officers, agents, and employees, from any and all claims, actions, suits, liability, loss,
costs, attorneys fees, costs of litigation, expenses, injuries, and damages of any nature whatsoever relating to or
Agreement for Professional Services (with professional liability coverage) Page 4 of 6
arising out of the wrongful or negligent acts, errors, 01 omissions in the services provided by Consultant,
Consultant's agents, subcontractors, subconsultants, and employees to the fullest extent permitted by law,
subject only to the limitations provided below.
Consultant's duty to defend, indemnify, and hold City harmless shall not apply to liability for damages arising
out of such services caused by or resulting from the sole negligence of City or City's agents or employees
pursuant to RCW 4.24.115.
Consultant's duty to defend, indemnify, and hold City harmless against liability for damages arising out of such
services caused by the concurrent negligence of (a) City or City's agents or employees, and (b) Consultant,
Consultant's agents, subcontractors, subconsultants, and employees shall apply only to the extent of the
negligence of Consultant, Consultant's agents, subcontractors, subconsultants, and employees.
Consultant's duty to defend, indemnify, and hold City harmless shall include, as to all claiuris, demands, losses,
and liability to which it applies, City's personnel -related costs, reasonable attorneys' fees, the reasonable value
of any services rendered by the office of the City Attorney, outside consultant costs, court costs, fees for
collection, and all other claim related expenses.
Consultant specifically and expressly waives any immunity that maybe granted it under the Washington State
Industrial Insurance Act, Title 51 RCW. These indemnification obligations shall not be limited in any way by
any lunitation on the amount or type of damages, compensation, or benefits payable to or for any third party
under workers' compensation acts, disability benefit acts, or other employee benefits acts. Provided, that
Consultant's waiver of immunity under this provision extends only to claims against Consultant by City, and
does not include, or extend to, any claims by Consultant's employees directly against Consultant.
Consultant hereby certifies that this indemnification provision was mutually negotiated.
13. Waiver. No officer, employee, agent, or other individual acting on behalf of either Party has the power,
right, or authority to waive any of the conditions or provisions of this Agreement. A waiver in one instance
shall not be held to be a waiver of any other subsequent breach or nonperformance. All remedies afforded in
this Agreement or by law shall be taken and construed as cumulative and in addition to every other remedy
provided herein or by law. Failure of either Party to enforce at any time any of the provisions of this
Agreement or to require at any time performance by the other Party of any provision hereof shall in no way be
construed to be a waiver of such provisions nor shall it affect the validity of this Agreement or any part thereof.
14. Assignment and Delegation. Neither Party shall assign, transfer, or delegate any or all of the
responsibilities of this Agreement or the benefits received hereunder without prior written consent of the other
Party,
15. Subcontracts. Except as otherwise provided herein, Consultant shall not enter into subcontracts for any of
the work contemplated under this Agreement without obtaining prior written approval of City.
16. Confidentiality. Consultant may, from time -to -time, receive information which is deemed by City to be
confidential. Consultant shall not disclose such information without the prior express written consent of City
or upon order of a court of competent jurisdiction.
17. Jurisdiction and Venue. This Agreement is entered into in Spokane County, Washington. Disputes
between City and Consultant shall be resolved in the Superior Court of the State of Washington in Spokane
County. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Consultant agrees that it may, at City's request, be joined as a party in
any arbitration proceeding between City and any third party that includes a claim or claims that arise out of, or
that are related to Consultant's services under this Agreement. Consultant further agrees that the Arbitrator(s)'
Agreement for Professional Services (with professional liability coverage) Page 5 of 6
decision therein shall be final and binding on Consultant and that judgment may be entered upon it in any court
having jurisdiction thereof.
18. Cost and Attorney's Fees. The prevailing party in any litigation or arbitration arising out of this
Agreement shall be entitled to its attorney's fees and costs of such litigation (including expert witness fees).
19. Entire Agreement. This written Agreement constitutes the entire and complete agreement between the
Parties and supersedes any prior oral or written agreements. This Agreement may not be changed, modified, or
altered except in writing signed by the Parties hereto.
20. Anti -kickback. No officer or employee of City, having the power or duty to perform an official act or
action related to this Agreement shall have or acquire any interest in this Agreement, or have solicited,
accepted, or granted a present or future gift, favor, service, or other thing of value from any person with an
interest in this Agreement.
21. Business Registration. Consultant shall register with the City as a business prior to commencement of
work under this Agreement if it has not already done so.
22. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause, or phrase of this Agreement should be held to be invalid for
any reason by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity shall not affect the validity of any other section,
sentence, clause, or phrase of this Agreement.
23. Exhibits. Exhibits attached and incorporated into this Agreement are:
A. Scope of Services
B. Fee proposal
C. Insurance Certificates
The Parties have executed this Agreement this _ day of , 20_
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Consultant:
Mark Calhoun, City Manager By:
Its: Authorized Representative
ATTEST:
Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Office of the City Attorney
Agreement for Professional Services (with professional liability coverage) Page 6 of 6
Exhibit A
Scope of Services
for
PROJECT: Glenrose and Central Park Basins
Floodplain Delineation
Abbreviated: G -CP FIS SOW
Prepared for:
City of Spokane Valley
Prepared by:
WEST Consultants, Inc.
12509 Bel -Red Road, Suite 100
Bellevue, WA 98005
PREAMBLE
Purpose:
The purpose of this project is to delineate the 1 -percent annual chance flood (also referred to as
the base flood or 100 -year flood) and the 0.2 -percent -annual -chance (or 500 -year) flood in
portions of the Glenrose and Central Park basins using detailed methods and then, for these
studied areas, revise the special flood hazard area (SFHA) delineations on the Federal Emergency
Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs) accordingly. This study will
result in either a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) or Physical Map Revision (PMR) depending on
FEMA discretion. These basins include areas within the City of Spokane Valley (City), City of
Spokane (Spokane) and Spokane County (County).
Parties to this Project:
• Consultant: WEST Consultants, Inc.
• ParticipatingJurisdictions: City and possibly in the future, through an interagency agreement,
Spokane and/or the County.
• Reviewing Jurisdictions: (at least) Spokane, the County and the Washington Department of
Ecology (Ecology).
Glenrose and Central Park LOMR/PMR Scope of Work 1
• Advisory Group: a collection of up to six individuals volunteering to provide non-binding
advice, review and comment to improve the quality of the project. The Parties shall
cooperatively select the members of the advisory group in the manner they determine is
appropriate.
Project Lead:
WEST Consultants is the project lead (Consultant) and shall perform all tasks described below.
Background:
The majority of the 100 -year floodplains within the Glenrose and Central Park basins are currently
designated as Zone A and were delineated using approximate methods so no flood water depths
or base flood elevations are shown within the zones. In many places, these FEMA -designated,
effective floodplain boundaries (some effective since at least 1992) do not match the existing
topography so it is possible there are homeowners paying for flood insurance that are not in a
flood zone. To provide better flood risk data for floodplain management and flood insurance
purposes, there is a need to delineate detailed, accurate floodplain boundaries.
Figure 1 shows the watershed boundaries of the Glenrose and Central Park basins. The Glenrose
basin is approximately nine square miles, The majority of the basin is within the County and
Spokane and only the most downstream portion is within the City. The area within the City and
Spokane is mostly urbanized, while the area within the County is mostly rural. The stormwater
in the drainage basin flows south to north, originating in the County and in Spokane, and flows
through the southwestern corner of the City before exiting into Spokane to the west. While
topography shows evidence of historic flows, it appears that most water is infiltrated into the
ground prior to entering the City boundaries, In the City, groundwater flows appear to surface
just southwest of 9th Avenue and Carnahan Road in a pond and overflow to the north into a
system designed for local neighborhood stormwater flows.
The Central Park basin is approximately 3.3 square miles and covers areas within the
unincorporated County and the City. The headwaters of the basin are within the rural and
undeveloped areas. The lower areas are primarily single-family residential. The stormwater in
the County portion of the basin flows generally south to north, and then travels east to west
through the City before joining Glenrose Creek.
The Glenrose and Central Park special flood hazard areas are currently mapped primarily as an
approximate Zone A on FEMA FIRM panels 53063C -0568D, -0564D, -0563D, and 0727D. Some
areas are mapped as shaded Zone X, defined as areas of 0.2% annual chance flood, or areas of
1% annual chance flood with average depths of less than 1 foot or with drainage areas less than
1 square mile.
Project Tasks
Tasks necessary for the project include:
Task 1: Data Collection and Review
Glenrose and Central Park LOMB/PMR Scope of Work 2
Task 2: Kick-off Meeting, Initial Site Visit, and Reconnaissance
Task 3: Topographic Data Development
Task 4: Data Collection Summarization and Jurisdiction Coordination
Task 5: Hydrologic Analysis and Second Site Visit
Task 6: Hydraulic Analysis
Task 7: Floodplain Mapping
Task 8: LOMR/PMR Submittal
Task 9: FEMA Reviews
Task 10: Public Outreach
Task 11: Meetings
Task 12: HSPF Model Training
Task 13: Flood Mitigation Recommendations
Task 14: Project Management
Tasks 1 through 9 are generally sequential; Task 10 through Task 14 will be occurring at different
points throughout the project. The Consultant shall participate in each Task as further described
herein.
All analyses and the floodplain mapping will be done in accordance with FEMA's Guidelines and
Specifications for flood Hazard Mapping. Flood flows will be developed for the 10-, 2-, 1- and
0.2-% annual chance flood (the 10-, 50-, 100- and 500 -year storms, respectively) at appropriate
locations. Floodplains will be delineated for the 1- and 0.2-% annual chance flood (the 100- and
500 -year floods, respectively) and fioodways will be delineated where appropriate for the 1%
annual chance flood.
The City is relying on the Consultant's expertise and years of experience on working with FEMA
on floodplain studies in the Consultant's development and confirmation of the following scope,
schedule and fees to cover all submittals, resubmittals, communications, coordination,
documentation and additional work necessary for the Consultant and all subconsultants to
complete each task.
Project Duration
The Agreement shall continue until all work set forth herein is completed. The Parties anticipate
that it will take at least five years to complete this project.
Fees
Fees are included in the Exhibit B.
Project Revisions
Glenrose and Central Park LOMR/PMR Scope of Work 3
If either Spokane and/or the County decide to participate in this project then at that time the
scope, schedule (where provided) and the fees shall be reviewed and revised as needed and
changes documented in writing with a Project Change Request or other appropriate form of
agreement prepared by the Consultant (see Task 14) and agreed to and signed by the Consultant,
City, and the joining members.
As is typical of complex flood insurance studies, the scope, schedule and the fee for each task is
an estimate and is understood to be flexible because the results of previous tasks in the sequence
may result in an adjustment of the scope, schedule and fee in successive tasks and/or a revisiting
of a previous task. If, prior to beginning work on a task or portion of a task, the Consultant, or
City realizes that the scope, schedule and/or fee needs to be revised then work on that task or
portion of the task shall be stopped until a revised scope, schedule and/or fee is documented in
writing with a Project Change Request prepared by the Consultant (see Task 14) and agreed to
and signed by the Consultant and City.
The Consultant and Participating Jurisdictions agree to negotiate any such Project Change
Request in good faith.
WORK PROGRAM:
The Consultant shall accomplish the following tasks, providing the needed services and
deliverables. Deliverables and meeting invitations, as noted in each Task, shall be provided to the
City, ReviewingJurisdictions and Advisory Group. Unless agreed to otherwise, the initial submittal
of a deliverable will be a draft for review and comment.
Task 1: Data Collection and Review
A key element of this floodplain delineation study is to develop flood hydrology that is
representative of the site conditions of the two basins. Important and unique features include
high infiltration, interaction between groundwater and surface water, and complex drainage
system that consists of inlets, drywells, pipes, open channels, bridges/culverts, and detention,
retention and evaporation ponds. Many commercial developments, public transportation
projects, and plat build -outs have occurred in the basins, and special study reports have also been
developed. These projects and associated supporting documents provide valuable information
of the basin characteristics, which is the foundation of developing a representative hydrologic
model.
The Consultant shall collect and review data and information from the City, Spokane, the County
and other agencies for hydrologic and hydraulic modeling. The City shall assist in data collection.
The City shall also use reasonable efforts to work with Spokane and the County to procure their
assistance in data collection.
Glenrose and Central Park LOMR/PMR Scope of Work 4
Data will be collected to evaluate basin characteristics which will include but not be limited to
the following:
• Drainage basin boundaries,
• Precipitation,
• Vegetation (e.g. canopy, rainfall interception),
• Soils (e.g. composition, infiltration),
• Geology (e.g. shallow bedrock, deep sands and gravels),
• Shallow groundwater, the ground water/surface water interaction and its possible
contribution to baseflows during the base flood,
• Pervious and impervious surfaces,
• Areas of significant depression storage,
• Land use (e.g. commercial and residential development),
• Zoning,
• Stormdrain system and facility size, depth, location, infiltration rate and capacity,
including —
o Pipes, catch basins, manholes, outlet locations
o Ponds: detention, retention, evaporation
a Regional facilities
o Large swales
o Dryweils
o Culverts
o Channels, natural drainageways
• Sewer systems receiving stormwater,
• Wetlands,
• Streets and bridges.
Data and information sources include, but are not limited to:
• LiDAR,
• Climate and flow datasets,
• Aerial photography,
• NRCS soil surveys,
• GIS layers,
• WA Dept. of Ecology data on registered UlCs (e.g. drywelis),
• Existing special studies (USGS, Glenrose/Central Park Stormwater Management Plan,
geotechnical, groundwater, hydrologic and hydraulic),
• Design and as -built plans for commercial and plat build -out plans, street improvement
plans, regional stormwater facilities,
• Drainage reports for stormdrain system and facility designs,
• Infiltration tests for soils and drainage structures,
• Complaints and documented issues (flooding, high groundwater, standing water in
drywells, etc.).
Glenrose and Central Park LOMB/PMR Scope of Work 5
The Consultant shall collect and review data and information prior to kick-off meeting and first
site visit. Consultant shall document all stormdrain systems and facilities that are judged to be
large enough to impact the flood flows to be modeled and to document all drywells.
Assumptions:
• The City shall help facilitate with obtaining documents and GIS datasets. The City shall
also use reasonable efforts to work with Spokane and the County to have them facilitate
obtaining documents and GIS datasets. GIS layers shall, at least, show locations of
drainage facilities and systems and drywells, etc. Consultant shall keep a log of all
documents obtained and/or reviewed.
• Consultant shall document the locations of up to 30 stormdrain systems, 10 culvert
groups, five bridges, 20 large ponds and regional stormwater facilities and 1200 drywells
for later possible field evaluation and/or inclusion in model.
• Consultant shall review up to:
o 15 special study reports with up to 1,500 pages,
o 30 designs of commercial developments, public street projects and plat build -outs
with up to 2,000 pages of supporting documents that may include geotechnical,
drainage reports, etc.
Deliverables:
• One data review memo including a list and summary of data collected and/or reviewed
and the relevance to this project.
Task 2: Kick-off Meeting, Initial Site Visit and Reconnaissance
In conjunction with a kickoff meeting with the City, Reviewing Jurisdictions, Advisory Group and
other interested parties, the Consultant shall make an initial site visit to confirm basin
characteristics from Task 1, obtain additional on-site information such as that mentioned in Tasks
3 and 4 below and determine other information needed.
In order to maximize the utility of this site visit, at least one week prior to this meeting/visit the
City and other interested parties shall provide to Consultant a maps) and/or list of areas of
concern, an estimate of channel reaches needing floodplain delineation and any other details
that will help clarify needed evaluation in this project.
The site reconnaissance assessment shall include, but is not limited to, the following items:
• Determining/confirming flow paths, barriers and potential basin divides,
• Estimating Manning roughness values,
• Confirming vegetation cover, geology, pervious and impervious surfaces, areas of
significant depression storage, and land use,
• Confirming location and condition (size, depth, location and capacity) of stormdrain
systems and facilities and bridges including those noted in Task 1, stormdrain systems and
Glenrose and Central Park LOMR/PMR Scope of Work 6
facilities and bridges shall be surveyed if as -built plans are not available or do not provide
adequate information,
• Surveying the channels including cross-sections where LiDAR data may not well capture
the field condition,
• Performing full-scale infiltration tests on drywells and infiltration test on pond bottoms
to determine rates,
Assumptions:
• The kick-off meeting, initial site visit and reconnaissance are anticipated to take five
people up to five working days,
• During site visit time an additional meeting with the City, Reviewing Jurisdictions and
other interested parties may be called to discuss intermediate findings,
• Number of stormdrain systems and facilities requiring in -field evaluation and possibly
survey include: 15 stormdrain systems, five culvert groups, three bridges, 10 large ponds
and regional stormwater facilities and 100 drywells,
• Number of in -field tests (per Spokane Regional Stormwater Manual chapter 4) to confirm
infiltration capacities include:
o drywells evaluated with full-scale drywell test: Glenrose — 7, Central Park - 3,
c pond bottoms evaluated for infiltration rates: Glenrose — 1, Central Park - 1,
Infiltration tests shall be conducted by the Consultant's subconsultant, ALLWEST Testing
Engineering Inc. in Spokane Valley.
Deliverables:
• Field visit documentation report including an assessment of items identified above and
implications for model development. Documentation shall include field notes, photos,
videos, survey data and list of additional information needed.
Task 3: Topographic Data Development
The Consultant shall acquire base maps and develop topography from LiDAR data and channel
surveys, and prepare the data as part of the LOMR/PMR for submittal to FEMA.
Deliverables:
• A memo explaining the process of developing the topographic data.
• Base maps, contours, and bare earth digital elevation models (DEMs).
Task 4: Data Collection Summarization and Jurisdiction Coordination
Upon successful completion of Tasks 1 through 3, a meeting either in person or remotely (e.g.
web/video) will be set up by Consultant to discuss data collection findings and future
Glenrose and Central Park LOMR/PMR Scope of Work 7
coordination. Future coordination shall include any known details to help define the scope of
upcoming tasks such as specific concentration points for the hydrologic analysis, channel limits
for the hydraulic analysis, areas with flooding issues for the flood mitigation recommendations,
etc.
Deliverables:
• A memo summarizing Data Collection and Jurisdiction Coordination.
Task 5: Hydrologic Analysis and Second Site Visit
The primary goal of this task is to develop flood hydrographs and peak flows at key points within
the Glenrose and Central Park basins. The Consultant and City shall work to develop a hydrologic
model that most reasonably represents flooding of the study area using reasonable rainfall -
runoff modeling parameters.
The hydrographs and peak flows will be developed using the hydrologic model, Hydrologic
Simulation Program Fortran (HSPF). The model will be used to develop the runoff from historical
precipitation records and applicable baseflows due to groundwater surfacing. Climate data may
include the precipitation data from the Spokane Airport, the PRISM data, and records at two rain
gages operated by Spokane.
Sub -basin boundaries and synthetic flows shall be developed at key locations throughout the
study area. The locations shall be determined by the Consultant, City and other participating
agencies to provide sufficient resolution and detail for developing the hydraulic model and
floodplain mapping that will represent the current conditions, and will also enable the evaluation
of impacts from future proposed developments to the floodplains. Once the initial layout of sub -
basins is determined, the Consultant shall provide the layout to the City for review prior to
beginning HSPF model construction.
The HSPF model will incorporate drywells, ponds (detention, retention and evaporation) and
other stormwater facilities that are located throughout the study area. The drywells and ponds
will help account for infiltration within the floodplain which may also include gravel pits and
channels. Where applicable, current final plats will assume to be fully built out.
A statistically based Flood Frequency Analysis (FFA) will be conducted on the Tong -term
simulation model results to develop distributions of the 10-, 2-, 1- and 0.2-°%o annual chance flood
peak flows at appropriate locations. The choice of FFA methodology will depend on the results
of the HSPF model. Typically, a Log -Pearson Type ill analysis is conducted for FFA in a non-
regulated basin; however, for Chester Creek, a graphical distribution approach was required due
to the number of years with zero flow at some points in the watershed.
Glenrose and Central Park LOMR/PMR Scope of Work 8
The hydrologic model will not be calibrated to a specific flood event as there is not any observed
data available. The HSPF model that was previously developed for the adjacent Chester Creek
watershed will be used as a guide in developing rainfall -runoff parameters. While there are not
flow or snowpack data available for the study basins, the parameters that affect snow
accumulation and melt in HSPF will be calibrated to the observed snow depth data collected at
the Spokane Airport. The parameters that control runoff will be calibrated to anecdotal evidence.
For example, the results from both Chester and Saltese Creeks studies as well as the flow record
along Hangman Creek all indicate that the December 1996 and January 1997 storms produced
an approximately 1% annual chance flood event in the region. The model results will also be
checked with local knowledge of runoff in recent years. Lastly, the flood frequency results from
the HSPF Tong -term simulation will be compared to regional data, including the results from the
Chester and Saltese Creeks, USGS regional regression equations (for rural sub -basins), and flood
frequency flows at gages in the region (for rural sub -basins). Based on this comparative analysis,
parameters within HSPF will be adjusted as needed to ensure reasonable results.
The Consultant shall submit the hydrologic analysis and report as a draft to the City, Reviewing
Jurisdictions and Advisory Group for review and comment. The Consultant shall submit the final
hydrologic analysis to FEMA that incorporates review comments and resulting revisions.
Site Visit and Meeting
Once the preliminary hydrologic model is developed, Consultant shall perform a site visit and
meet with the City, Reviewing Jurisdictions, Advisory Group and other interested parties to
discuss findings. The purpose of the site visit is to perform a field check of sub -basin delineations,
model elements connectivity, and verify preliminary hydrologic results.
Asumptions:
Number of study items in each basin:
• sub -basins/ concentration points: Glenrose — 60, Central Park - 20,
• stormdrain systems: Glenrose — 25, Central Park - 5,
• culvert groups: Glenrose — 7, Central Park — 3,
• bridges: Glenrose — 4, Central Park - 1,
• large ponds and regional stormwater facilities: Glenrose — 17, Central Park - 3
• drywells: Glenrose — 1000, Central Park — 200 (note that most drywells probably will be
aggregated for inclusion in model)
Deliverables:
• A draft and final memo that describes the choice of HSPF over HEC -HMS for the hydrologic
analysis.
• Initial layout of sub -basin delineations and concentration points.
• GIS shapefiles of delineated flow paths and routing, stream networks, sub -basins and
stormwater facilities; boundaries of areas with assessed infiltration.
• HSPF model snow calibration.
• A draft hydrologic analysis.
Glenrose and Central Park LOMR/PMR Scope of Work
A final hydrologic analysis submittal incorporating review comments and resulting
revisions for incorporation into the LOMR/PMR submittal.
Task 6: Hydraulic Analysis
The primary goal of this task is to develop floodplain and floodway limits and flood elevations
within the City.
The Consultant shall perform hydraulic modeling with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers software
using the latest official (FEMA -approved, non -beta) version available when the work commences.
Once the initial layout of cross-sections and structures needing analysis is determined, the
Consultant shall provide the layout to the City, Reviewing Jurisdictions and Advisory Group for
review. Cross-section density shall be such as to enable a quick and confident determination of
water surface elevations at permanent structures.
The hydraulic model will not be calibrated to a specific flood event as there is not any observed
data available. The Consultant and City shall work to develop a hydraulic model that most
reasonably represents flooding of the study area based upon the experience and judgement of
the Consultant and the City and upon historical observations of flooding by the City. The City and
Consultant may work with other interested parties, including Spokane and the County in
development of the model.
For the City, the Consultant shall perform hydraulic modeling, including floodplain and floodway
delineations, of the Glenrose, Central Park and Bettman (in Central Park) channels within the City
from downstream City boundary to upstream City boundary. The Consultant shall evaluate the
need to use a coupled 1D/2D model to best represent the flood conditions in areas with possible
flow splits. If a coupled 1D/2D model will best represent the flood conditions then that shall be
utilized.
The stream miles are approximately distributed as follows:
• Central Park Channel - 1.5 miles with 0 bridges and 1 culvert group(s),
• Bettman Channel - 0.4 miles with 2 bridges and 1 culvert group(s),
• Glenrose Channel - 0.6 miles with 0 bridges and 2 culvert group(s),
• Overland flowpaths - 1.9 miles with 0 bridges and 1 culvert group(s).
The Consultant shall submit the hydraulic analysis and report as a draft to the City, Reviewing
Jurisdictions and Advisory Group for review and comments. The Consultant shall submit the final
hydraulic analysis to FEMA that incorporates review comments and resulting revisions.
Deliverables:
Glenrose and Central Park LOMR/PMR Scope of Work 10
• Initial layout of cross-sections and structures.
• GIS shapefiles of HEC -RAS components.
• Draft Hydraulic Model — This will be a HEC -RAS simulation with all hydrologic and
geometric data included in the model. The model will include the results of discussions
with the City, Reviewing Jurisdictions and Advisory Group to determine if the HEC -RAS
model is appropriately estimating observed flooding in the reaches.
• Preliminary Hydraulic Model — This will be the HEC -RAS model, including the 10-, 2-, 1-,
and 0.2-% annual chance flood events, and the encroachment analyses.
• Hydraulic Model for LOMR/PMR — This will be the model that incorporates review
comments and resulting revisions for incorporation into the LOMR/PMR submittal,
Task 7: Floodplain Mapping
The Consultant shall complete flood mapping of the study area shown in Figure 1 per input by
the City. Based on the hydraulic model results, the floodway, 1% -annual -chance floodplain and
0.2% -annual -chance floodplain boundaries will be delineated and provided on topographic
workmaps. The Consultant shall develop flood profiles and floodway data tables. The Consultant
shall submit the floodplain mapping according to FEMA's Guidelines and Specifications for flood
Hazard Mapping as a draft to the City, Reviewing Jurisdictions and Advisory Group for review.
The Consultant shall submit the final floodplain mapping that incorporates review comments and
resulting revisions for incorporation into the LOMR/PMR submittal.
Deliverables:
• Preliminary mapping items as described in FEMA's Guidelines and Specifications for flood
Hazard Mapping for mapping of riverine flooding..
• The Consultant shall deliver the final floodplain mapping incorporating review comments
and resulting revisions for incorporation into the LOMR/PMR submittal.
Task 8: LOMR/PMR Submittal
The Consultant shall prepare a LOMR/PMR submittal for FEMA review. The package will include
all required materials including FEMA's certification forms, topographic data, hydrologic and
hydraulic models and a study report, and mapping products (flood profiles, Floodway Data
Tables, work maps, GIS data). The Consultant shall prepare public notifications and notices to
affected landowners on behalf of the City
The Consultant and City shall select either a LOMR or a PMR request after discussions with FEMA
during the course of the study.
Glenrose and Central Park LOMR/PMR Scope of Work 11
Deliverables:
• A draft LOMR/PMR submittal package.
• A LOMR/PMR submittal package for FEMA review.
Task 9: FEMA Reviews
The Consultant shall develop responses to FEMA comments, make necessary revisions to the
LOMR/PMR submittal package, and prepare responses or a resubmittal, as needed. Four rounds
of FEMA reviews and Consultant responses are assumed.
Deliverables:
• A resubmittal of the LOMR/PMR package incorporating FEMA review comment responses
and resulting revisions.
Task 10: Public Outreach
Public outreach activities shall be led by the Consultant's subconsultant, Studio Cascade, Inc.
(Studio Cascade), and assisted by the Consultant. Studio Cascade is a Spokane -based community
planning and design firm with experience in multiple facets of public and private sector planning.
To get the public involved and seek input from the public throughout the study, three (3) public
meetings/updates located in or near the project area are expected, including (1) an open -house
meeting to discuss project scope, schedule, and expected outcomes; (2) proposed flood
hydrology; (3) preliminary hydraulic results and flood maps.
The subconsultant shall devote approximately 24 hours to each meeting, including time to
prepare and run the public events. That includes the work of two staff members to build meeting
materials based on technical information the Consultant provides, coordinate with the City and
others on meeting logistics and to prepare the venue, as appropriate. It also includes having two
staff members attending the meeting, running the agenda, taking meeting notes and
participating in the event to the degree appropriate. This is based on the assumption that the
meetings are essentially informational in nature, where material at various stages in the process
are packaged and presented to the public to inform them of the project, These are not
workshops, where attendees will participate in various exercises and group discussions to advise
on the project or wrestle with challenging issues.
Deliverables:
• Presentation materials
Glenrose and Central Park LOMR/PMR Scope of Work 12
« Meeting minutes
Task 11: Meetings
To ensure that the Consultant provides high quality deliverables within budget and on schedule,
the Consultant shall be expected to attend the following meetings:
In -Person Kickoff meeting. In conjunction with the site visit (Task 2), the Consultant will attend
a kickoff meeting in the City. The Consultant shall prepare a draft meeting agenda and draft and
final meeting minutes.
Data Collection Summarization and Jurisdiction Coordination meeting. The meeting to be
remote (web/video) in conjunction with Task 4.
In -Person Project and Hydrologic Analysis Update meeting. In conjunction with the second site
visit (Task 5), the Consultant will attend a meeting in the City to discuss the project to date, the
hydrologic model and findings. The Consultant shall prepare a draft meeting agenda and draft
and final meeting minutes.
Public Outreach Meetings. The Consultant shall provide technical data to Studio Cascade and
attend three public outreach meetings in conjunction with Task 10.
Bi -weekly Web/Video meetings. The Consultant shall report bi-weekly progress and activities,
discuss model results, identify potential issues, and discuss solutions. The Consultant shall
prepare draft and final meeting minutes.
Incremental Review Meetings. The Consultant shall attend the following in-person or web/video
meetings:
1. hydrology with snow and runoff calibration (web/video);
2. hydrology with flood frequency flows (web/video);
3. hydraulics with 1D, and discussion on 2D areas (web/video)
4. a preliminary LOMR/PMR submittal (web/video).
FEMA Coordination. The Consultant shall have a meeting/conference call with FEMA Region X at
the beginning of the study to understand the submittal requirements, review process, and
timelines. The Consultant shall update FEMA on progresses at a semiannual basis.
Glenrose and Central Park LOMR/PMR Scope of Work 13
Task 12: HSPF Model Training
The Consultant shall develop documentation of the HSPF modeling including detailed, dear
instructions for future users on how to modify the model for anticipated land use and
development changes. In addition to the modeling documentation, the Consultant shall develop
training materials for a one -day (maximum) training class for city and county staff and others to
learn to run and modify the HSPF model and shall lead the one day (maximum) training class at
the City. The training materials and instruction shall be specific to the HSPF model developed for
this study, not a general HSPF modeling course.
Assumptions:
• To make the training more effective, the maximum number of participants is 15,
Deliverables:
• The Consultant shall deliver the HSPF modeling documentation and training materials for
the one -day (maximum) training class for jurisdiction staff and others.
• The Consultant shall travel to the City and lead the one -day (maximum) training class.
Task 13: Flood Mitigation Recommendations
With input from the City, the Consultant shall formulate and recommend potential projects at a
conceptual level to reduce flooding issues that occur within the project areas. The mitigation
alternative analysis will require HSPF and HEC -RAS modeling.
Deliverables:
• A report that presents the alternatives and results
Task 14: Project Management
The Consultant is to be the project manager and to perform active day-to-day administration of
the project. Consultant is responsible for project management which includes but is not limited
to:
• Planning work to be done to accomplish tasks, who will do it and monitoring the schedule
and budget,
• Organizing and conducting meetings, keeping parties on task, compiling meeting minutes
where not provided by subconsultant,
• Coordinating reviews and comments,
Glenrose and Central Park LOMR/PMR Scope of Work 14
• Keeping track of documents received and generated,
• Notifying the City of information needs, deadlines, upcoming milestones, etc.
• Providing monthly invoices to and keeping track of tasks performed for and fees charged.
Consultant shall provide sufficient details to support its invoices, including time sheets for
services performed and expense summaries, unless otherwise agreed to by the Parties.
• Developing progress reports for and weekly communication with the City to ensure that
all tasks are performed on time and within budget.
• Preparing and facilitating Project Change Requests (PCR) for any necessary changes in the
scope of work, schedule or fees. PCRs may be initiated by any of the Parties and shall be
prepared, facilitated and processed by the Consultant. The PCR must describe the change,
the rationale for the change, and the effect the change will have on the project. If the
change is approved by all Parties, the Parties shall sign the PCR, which shall constitute
approval for the work and project revision.
Glenrose and Central Park LOMR/PMR Scope of Work 15
Figure 1. Glenrose — Central Park Basins
Legend
Municipal Boundaries
Watersheds
GLENROSE
Q CENTRAL PARK
SF HA
A
Glenrose and Central Park LOMR/PMR Scope of Work 16
WEST
C.19•,•1104.V.6.10e.
WEST Con
125i19 Belaert Read, Suite IOti
Hamer, WA 5800S -253s
.12.5.6.46.SSOG (phont)
425.444.0570 (fax)
Exhibit B - Cost Estimate
CLIENT: City orSpokane Valley
PROJECT : Glenn:Ise and Central Park Basins Floodplik Delineation
P.D. No.: Proj. No.:
Dates
6/9/2018
...............
Tisknesessitn
WEST Conmle3nts. Inc.
PHASE
TOTALS
Project
tanner
QAiQc
Senior
Engineer 2
Sentar
Engineer 1
Staff
Engineer 2
Staff
Engineer 1
Sr. GIS
Speriaiist
Jr. GIS
Specialist
otes
Td
Tour! Labr
o
Esanes
p
SubCanmoIun n
CITY OF SPoKA,NE VALLEY
Task I. Data CoLloction and Rovimv
9
0
22
0
0
124
4
29
187
921.846
821.846
Task 2, Kick-ofINIcatina. Initial Site Visit and Rmonnainnloce
41
0
2
0
0
44
0
S
95
V7,986
93.889
$9:300
541.075
Task 3. Toactsmoina Data Development
0
1 0
2
0
0
0
6
20
29
S2.955
92,955
Task 4. Data Collection =8 Imisdiction Coordination
12
0
2
0
0
4
0
D
18
53.341
S3.341
Task 5. HvdrolonizAnalvsis and Second Silo Visit
27
8
44
0
0
180
90
8
357
945,233
9701
545 934
T± 6. Hydraulic AialvSis
8
4
30
0
0
174
12
52
280
932.329
532.328
Task 7. Floodolain Mapping
1
0
LO
0
0
22
12
64
109
511.734
511.734
Task S. LOMR/Philk Submittal
4
1 0
10
0
D
32
0
:72
118
912.785
S12-785
Task 9. FIE1V1A Roviews
8
1 0
16
0
3
49
0
32
104
512.477
512.477
Task 10. Public Outreach
3
0 1
0
0
0 1
12
0
24 1
39
84,230
91.089
5;13.901:,
916,119
Task 1I. Moctines
74
0
0
0
0
46
0
0 I
120
920.901
920.901
Task 12_ FISFF Model Traiaine
1
1 0
0
0
0
64
0
16
81
99,571
98.571
Toik13.Flood Miticatioa RO,...ocumcildarlOas
12
0
6
3
0
83 1
0
44
142
916.302
916.302
Tosk14. Itolocs Manatormont
72
0
0 1
0
0
3
0
0
72
S15,567
S15.567
TOTAL HOURS
HOURLY B1LLING RATE
SUBTOTALS
272
12 T 144
0
0
5216.21
358.810
5208,05 3160.17
92.497 923.065
3144.14
910555
SD
SO
830 124
368:
S105:55 5119.29 1 S95.95
588.439 514.792 j 835.309
1,750 9236.256 1 S5,679 920,000 S261.935
Nares
I. Hourly billing rates and number of hours are for estimating purposes only.
Invoices will he based on actual wages and hours of xraff assigaed la the projeci
TOTAL COMPENSATION: S261,935
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: September 11, 2018 Department Director Approval:
Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ® admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Spokane Valley Express System (SVexpress)
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: n/a
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: n/a
BACKGROUND: At the beginning of 2018, the City began the transition of service providers for
our Citizen Action Request Entry System (CARES) from EGov to QAlert, the same provider as
our website. QAlert offers more features to enable staff to better respond to citizen and
maintenance concerns within the City. With the transition, CARES has been rebranded as
SVexpress. SVexpress enables citizens to report concerns and maintenance issues they see
around the City any time of day or night through the website and mobile app. SVexpress is up
and running and available to the citizens to use.
The website provides citizens with information regarding common concerns through the
knowledge base articles, which are similar to frequently asked questions; provides additional
contact information for concerns that do not fall under the contracted City services such as
animal control or parking enforcement; and provides additional information to the citizens
regarding the City's process and timeline for addressing concerns.
The mobile app is a quick, effective way of reporting maintenance issues throughout the City. It
utilizes the phone's GPS to identify the location of a maintenance issue and allows the citizen to
receive updates regarding the concerns they have submitted.
SVexpress ensures accuracy through GPS and map capabilities, increased communication
between staff for addressing concerns, increased searching capabilities, and enhanced
reporting capabilities; and is customizable to our unique needs.
OPTIONS: Discussion
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Discussion
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: The 2018 Budget included funds to acquire the software and
provide staff training.
STAFF CONTACT: Elisha Heath
ATTACHMENTS: PowerPoint
Welcome to SVexpress
formerly C.A.R.E.S. (Citizen Action Request Entry System)
express
Website
www.spokanevalley.org/311
SOokane
Request for Service Contact
Report your concern by submitting a request for service through SVexpress 24/7 and it will be
cessed during regular business hours. if this is an emergency, dial 911.
Request for Service
Contact
Copyright 0 2818 - 45cend Technobgies. Inc
Spokane Valley www.spokanevalleyorg
2
Spokane—
Knowledge Base
Request for Service Contact
snow
7 matches found for snow
Q
Or browse categories
How long do I have to clear the sidewalk after a snow event?
How much snow/ice can accumulate before I receive a fine?
When will my street get plowed?
What equipment and/or personnel does the City have for snow
operations?
Why can't the plow driver lift the blade at my driveway?
My mail isn't getting delivered due to snow/berm in front of mailbox -
who is respon
en does deicing occur?
Can't find what you're looking for? Create a request for service
Gopy.igtn ®2g1 a -Ostend Technologies, Inc
Spokane Valley wwwspokanevalleyarg
Spokane
Knowlcdqc Base Rcqucst for Scrvicc Contact
What equipment and/or personnel does the City have for
snow operations?
Plowing
7- Plow/Sander trucks
3-- Plow/Deicer trucks
4- Regular driver/operators with additional contracted personnel as
needed
Was this page helpful? Yes me No If
rayrlgh[ 0 t61 i1-Q3cerd Techrwlpplest Inc
Spokane Valley wwwspokanevallevorg
SPolane
alley
Knowledge Base
Contact
Report your concern by submitting a request for service through SVexpress 24/7 and it will be
processed during regular business i s !f this is an emergency, dial 911.
Knowledge Base
Contact
Copyright 0 2018 - Q8cend Ted rol gins. Inc
Spokane Valley www.spokanevalley.org
5
Spokane
Location
Issue Location
Details Contact Info
Or drag and drop y on the map
Millwood
Ave
Next
E Avn
4
E Are
_Spokane _ N
E Valley
GREENACRES
E Rrnndwna
aishman
N TV
YERAOALE s.,,
r Sri, Ave LOV'
1,-'' c s Leu, Ave R ei
e m
i T.
n A o
ry4 c .'j F 1F.11, Au, . f m
n,.__E Map data €2018 Google Terms of Use Report a map error
Knowledge Base Request for Service Contact
6
Spokane
Knowledge Base Request for Service Contact
Re ' uest for Service
Location
Issue Location
Details
Contact Info
10210 East Sprague Avenue, Spokane Valley, WA, USA1
Q
Or drag and drop
on the rnap
— + !Map Type: sneers
2
m
E Appleway &'Vd
Next
Sprag
Co
79
ve
z
0
C
77
1
pd puvui(e!A N
Map data T. 20113 Google Terms of Ike Report a map error
7
Location
Type of Issue*
Details
Contact Info
Broken Sprinkler (on City property)
Building & Planning
Business Licenses
Code Enforcement
Dead Wildlife Removal
Drainage and Erosion Questions
Flooding
General Street Maintenance
8
Location
Type of Issue*
Office of the City Council
Details
Contact Info
Please leave your comment or question for Spokane Valley City
Councilmembers. The assistant to the Council will share your
concern(s) with the Council,
Comments*
0 3 related knowledge base articles
8 Add Photos or Files
Back
Next
Related Knowledge Base Articles
When are Council meetings?
Where can I find the video recordings from Council meetings?
Which Councilmember represents my neighborhood?
9
Request for Service
Location
First Name
Last Name
Email Address
Phone
Address
Add Second Lin -e
City 1 State / Zip
Spokane Valley WA
Details
Notify me of updates
0 Email me at
Cali me at Primary Number
Back
Create Request
Contact Info
10
Mobile App
SVexpress311
•••_= QScend
•
Messages
lib
Weather
10:00 AM
1'00% —
Calendar
Photos
Camera
fl/
Videos
Notes
Newsstand
iTunes Store
App Store
IZI4. "A 81°%o18:28AM
SVexpress311
A Report a Concern
I§ News
City Calendar
CO City Website
V Twitter
.11 T -Mobile Wi-Fi
2:21 PM 1 0 •
Back Select a type
To begin a new service request select an issue type.
Broken Sprinkler
Dead Wildlife Removal
General Street Maintenance
Graffiti
Gravel Shouldering
Hazard on Street
Illegal Dumping
Obstruction by Tree/Bush
Report a Pothole
Snow
Traffic Signs - Missing, Down, or Damaged
Features that allow staff to be
more effective and responsive to
citizen's concerns.
els Add Edit X Delete Print
Views
Request Types
Open and In Progress
All open ono In progress requests
My Service Requests
Escalating Soon
Closed
+Add View
ID
Request Type Address Create Date
12852 Downhill driveways and property along cu...
13200 Accumulation of garbage
13195 Report a business operating in a residenti...
13193 Drainage and Erosion Questions
7512 E Beverly Dr
Spokane Valley
18614 E Courtland Ave
Spokane Valley
13314 E 4th Ave
Spokane Valley
12614 E 12th Ave
Spokane Valley
7/3/2018
8/9/2013
8/9/2013
8/912018
ID
Request Type
Address
Create Date Last Action
13164 Traff c signs missing, down or damaged
13194 Trail issues
13197 Broken Sprinkler (on City property)
Spokane Valley
Appleway Trail and S C...
Spokane Valley
Spokane Valley
8/3/2018
8/9/2018
8/9/2018
8/10/2018 •
8/9/2018
0/9/2018
14
Views
Open and In Progress
My Service Requests
Escalating Soon
Closed
T Add VIe'r'•,
Request Types Search Requests
0 Refresh List
KB
ncis Ave
L'n'ellesley Ave
E Fredsnc&
E 1:111 Aye
1 21h Aee
E
ve
E 9ojeimr Gulch Rd
Pasadena Park E rte:;•., „
l'e•ey Av'• • 1 Yie°le=. ey Ave G S
111▪ 1 Orchards
• Farm
- a eksne R
• Mill�od •
i dine
iE Mi Sinn s•;� � jly'
• 0 CV ° • •
0
•
•
hman •Q0: 0 •
�. � U 7A6��
•
zT•� 0
SE 2,11h !i$th Ave 8
• s ..a are•
Glenrese
',Pie Are.
•
_h_;dAri
• •
r; -.n Arp
CR__NACRE.
• COS
0•.
F ELicki:.v¢
Liberty lake
•
--
17 So
15
ell. Add � Edit X Delete Print
View Request Types 1 Search Open and In Progress
open and In Progress
I openand in progress reqs
My Service Requests
Escalating Soon
Closed
+Add View
Search Help Go tJ Help Q Contad Support 0 Academy
ti Refresh = LA 8 KE
Search
Sprague Ave
a
hilT stam
re
I P R
c y of Spahr Valley
Safe Routes to Schools
Service Areas
Sidewalk Stent Removal Priority Areas
Valley Parcel
Water Districts
Sprague Ave
0
16
Questions
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: September 11, 2018 Department Director Approval:
Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ® admin. report ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: City Delegation to Washington D.C.
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: n/a
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: None.
BACKGROUND: During the Advance Agenda portion of our August 21, 2018 Council meeting,
Councilmember Wick suggested that Spokane Valley consider sending a delegation to
Washington D.C. to advocate for City programs such as the Pines Grade Separation Project and
the related CRISI and BUILD grant applications that we have submitted. At that time Staff
indicated we would come forward with a future administrative report that would allow Council a
better opportunity for further discussion. Some issues for Council consideration include:
• What topics would we plan to discuss?
• Who would we plan to meet with?
o Federal legislative delegation
o US DOT
o FRA
o ???
• What would be the composition of the delegation making the trip?
• How would the delegation navigate from place to place while in D.C.?
• How many days of travel would this require?
• When would the trip take place?
OPTIONS: Council discretion.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Staff is seeking direction from Council on how to
proceed.
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: We assume a trip would be comprised of airfare, three nights
in a hotel, meals and ground transportation while in D.C. and that the total cost per delegate would
be $3,000. For 2018, although this was not considered during the budget preparation process,
this would not require a budget amendment because we could accommodate the expense
through unexpended funds from the Federal Lobbyist line -item in the City Council budget. We
have included $18,000 for travel in the 2019 Budget and this assumes two trips by three people
each time at a cost of $3,000 each (2 x 3 x $3,000 = $18,000).
STAFF CONTACT: Mark Calhoun
ATTACHMENTS: None.
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: September 11, 2018 Department Director Approval:
Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ® admin. report ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Potential Membership in Aging and Long Term Care of Eastern
Washington.
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: n/a
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Council has heard Administrative Reports on this topic
at the July 17 and August 14, 2018 Council meeting. To date no action has been taken.
BACKGROUND:
• In June 2018 the City was approached by Aging and Long Term Care of Eastern
Washington to inquire whether the City of Spokane Valley might be interested in
joining their organization and having representation by a Councilmember on their
governing board of directors.
• At the July 17, 2018 Council meeting an Administrative Report was delivered by Aging
and Long Term Care that provided an overview of their budget and the services they
provide. During the discussion, Councilmembers learned that participation by
Spokane Valley would necessitate signing onto an interlocal agreement and it was
also stated that the number of Spokane Valley Councilmembers serving on the
governing board could be a point of negotiation.
• At the August 14, 2018 Council meeting, a follow-up Administrative Report was
delivered by City staff and at that time, Councilmembers reached consensus to
consider joining into the interlocal agreement with Aging and Long Term Care and
requested the appointment of two Councilmembers to the governing board.
• City staff communicated Council's desire to Aging and Long Term Care, and their staff
consulted with the existing governing board who noted that their existing board is
composed of 4 members from rural counties and 4 members from the Spokane region.
Their collective preference is to maintain the balance between the rural counties and
the Spokane region, but the City of Spokane has offered to reduce its membership on
the board from 3 to 2 thus allowing Spokane Valley to hold 1 position.
• Aging and Long Term Care also has a Planning and Management Council that is
composed entirely of volunteers. This Council has a committee that recruits,
interviews and nominates new members whose appointment to the committee must
be approved by the Governing Board. The Chair of this Council also holds a positon
on the Governing Board.
Following are tables that reflect the current and proposed board compositions:
Current Governing Board Composition
Agency
# of
Board
Members
City of Spokane Valley
0
City of Spokane **
3
Spokane County
1
Stevens County
1
Whitman County
1
Pend Oreille County 4
1
Ferry County
1
Chair of Planning &
Mgmt. Council
1
Total
9
"comprised of 1 Councilmember
and 1 City executive branch
appointee.
"comprised of Councilmembers
and 1 City executive branch
appointee.
r 4 Spokane
region
4 Rural
Proposed Governing Board Composition
Agency
# of
Board
Members
City of Spokane Valley
1
City of Spokane **
2
Spokane County
1
Stevens County
1
Whitman County
1
Pend Oreille County
1
Ferry County
1
Chair of Planning &
Mgmt. Council
1
Total
9
"comprised of 1 Councilmember
and 1 City executive branch
appointee.
4 Spokane
region
4 Rural
Aging and Long Term Care hopes to reach agreement in advance of their November 2, 2018
governing board meeting so at that time they can present an amended interlocal agreement that
includes Spokane Valley and the necessary change in board composition. Assuming board
approval on November 2, a revised interlocal agreement will be advanced to all participating
jurisdictions for approval with the intent that it go into effect on January 1, 2019.
Councilmembers currently serve on a total of 17 boards and committees.
OPTIONS: Council discretion.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Staff is seeking direction from Council on how to
proceed. If Council choses to join into the interlocal agreement, we anticipate staff will return in
the latter part of November or early December with an administrative report that includes a motion
consideration for approval.
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Based upon information presented by Aging and Long Term
Care on July 17, 2018, the cost to Spokane Valley is based upon the ratio of the number of
Spokane Valley's residents that are 60+ years of age relative to the total of all participating
municipalities. Based upon 2010 census data, the City of Spokane Valley could expect to pay
roughly 16.0% or $12,100 per year if Council choses to participate on this board. We have
included this in the 2019 Budget, but if Council chose to forgo participation we can remove the
appropriation.
STAFF CONTACT: Mark Calhoun
ATTACHMENTS:
• Council committee assignments.
Council Committees, Boards, etc. 2018
Currently for year ending 2018:
1. Chamber of Commerce Board (Greater Spokane Valley) — Arne Woodard
2. Clean Air Agency, Spokane Regional — Rod Higgins
3. Finance Committee: Rod Higgins, Pam Haley, Sam Wood
4. GMA (Growth Mgmt Steering Committee of Elected Officials) — Rod Higgins, Sam Wood
5. Governance Manual Committee —Arne Woodard, Sam Wood, Linda Thompson
6. GSI — Rod Higgins [must be mayor]
7. HCDAC (Housing and Community Development Advisory Committee) — Arne Woodard
8. Health District Board — Linda Thompson, Ben Wick
9. Lodging Tax Advisory Committee — Sam Wood
10. Mayors Association of Northeast Washington — Mayor Higgins
11. Spokane County Continuum of Care for the Homeless — Arne Woodard
12. SRTC (Spokane Regional Transportation Council) - Arne Woodard
13. STA (Spokane Transit Authority) — Pam Haley, Sam Wood, and Arne Woodard as alternate
14. Tourism Promotion Area (TPA) — Sam Wood
15. Visit Spokane — Ben Wick, Linda Thompson (as alternate)
16. Wastewater Policy Advisory Board — Arne Woodard, Rod Higgins
PAM HALEY
Finance Committee
STA
ROD HIGGINS
Clean Air Agency
Finance Committee
GMA
GSI
Mayors Association of Northeast Washington
Wastewater Policy Advisory Board
BRANDI PEETZ
LINDA THOMPSON
Governance Manual Committee
Health Board
Visit Spokane (alternate)
BEN WICK
Health Board
Visit Spokane
SAM WOOD
Finance Committee
GMA
Governance Manual Committee
LTAC
STA
TPA
ARNE WOODARD
Chamber of Commerce
Governance Manual Committee
HCDAC
Spokane Co Continuum of Care
SRTC
STA (alternate)
Wastewater Policy Advisory Board
[Although not directly appointed, the Mayor and Deputy Mayor are also on the Advance Agenda
Committee]
To:
From:
Re:
DRAFT
ADVANCE AGENDA
as of September 6, 2018; 8:30 a.m.
Please note this is a work in progress; items are tentative
Council & Staff
City Clerk, by direction of City Manager
Draft Schedule for Upcoming Council Meetings
Sept 18, 2018, Study Session, 6:00 p.m. fdue Tue Sept 111
1. Outside Agencies Presentations (Economic Dev & Social Services combined) - Chelsie Taylor (- 60 minutes)
2. Street & Stormwater Main. Programs - John Hohman, Harry Lorick, Consultant (30 minutes)
3. Integration of Combined Communication Center - Chief Werner, Chief Collins
4. Proposed Ordinance Adopting 2019 Property Taxes - Chelsie Taylor
5. Advance Agenda - Mayor Higgins
(20 minutes)
(10 minutes)
(5 minutes)
[*estimated meeting: 125 mins]
Sept 25, 2018, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m.
1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes)
2. Second Reading Ordinance 18-020 Amending Business License - Erik Lamb
3. Second Reading Ordinance 18-021 Amending SVMC 2.10.020, Commission -Cary Driskell
4. First Reading Ordinance 18- Amending Park Regulations - Cary Driskell, Mike Stone
5. Mayoral Appointment: Human Rights Task Force - Mayor Higgins
6. Admin Report: CRAVE Update - Mike Basinger; Tom Stebbins
7. Admin Report: City Manager Presentation of 2019 Preliminary Budget - Mark Calhoun
8. Admin Report: Advance Agenda - Mayor Higgins
9. Info Item: Department Reports
[due Tue Sept 181
(5 minutes)
(10 minutes)
(15 min)
(15 minutes)
(10 minutes)
(10 minutes)
(45 minutes)
(5 minutes)
[*estimated meeting: 115 mins]
Oct 2, 2018, Study Session, 6:00 p.m.
1. Duplex Density Discussion - Lori Barlow
2. Budget Amendment, 2018 - Chelsie Taylor
3. Governance Manual - Chris Bainbridge
4. Legislative Agenda, 2019 - Mark Calhoun
5. Advance Agenda - Mayor Higgins
fdue Tue Sept 25
(15 minutes)
(10 minutes)
(15 minutes)
(15 minutes)
(5 minutes)
[*estimated meeting: 60 mins]
Oct 9, 2018, Formal meeting Format, 6:00 p.m.
1. PUBLIC HEARING #2: 2019 Budget - Chelsie Taylor
2. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes)
3. Second Reading Ordinance 18- Amending Park Regulations - Cary Driskell, Mike
4. First Reading Ordinance 18- , Property Tax - Chelsie Taylor
5. Advance Agenda - Mayor Higgins
Oct 16, 2018, Study Session, 6:00 p.m.
1. Police Precinct Lease Renewal - Morgan Koudelka
2. Advance Agenda - Mayor Higgins
fdue Tue Oct 21
(20 minutes)
(5 minutes)
Stone (15 minutes)
(10 minutes)
(5 minutes)
[*estimated meeting: 55 mins]
Oct 23, 2018, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m.
1. PUBLIC HEARING: 2018 Budget Amendment - Chelsie Taylor
2. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes)
3. Second Reading Ordinance 18- , Property Tax - Chelsie Taylor
4. First Reading Ordinance 18 -,adopting 2018 Budget Amendment - Chelsie Taylor
5. First Reading Ordinance 18- , adopting 2019 Budget - Chelsie Taylor
6. Motion Consideration: Outside Agency Allocation of Funds - Chelsie Taylor
7. Motion Consideration: Approval of 2019 Legislative Agenda - Mark Calhoun
Draft Advance Agenda 9/6/2018 11:12:41 AM
fdue Tue Oct 91
(10 minutes)
(5 minutes)
[due Tue Oct 161
(10 minutes)
(5 minutes)
(10 minutes)
(10 minutes)
(10 minutes)
(20 minutes)
(10 minutes)
Page 1 of 2
8. Admin Report: Quarterly Police Department Report — Chief Werner
9. Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins
10. Info Item: Department Reports
Oct 30, 2018, Study Session, 6:00 p.m.
1. Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins
Nov 6, 2018, Study Session, 6:00 p.m.
1. Fee Resolution for 2019 — Chelsie Taylor
2. Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins
(10 minutes)
(5 minutes)
[*estimated meeting: 90 mins]
Nov 13, 2018, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m.
1. PUBLIC HEARING #3: 2019 Budget — Chelsie Taylor
2. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes)
3. Second Reading Ordinance 18 -,adopting 2018 Budget Amendment — Chelsie Taylor
4. Second Reading Ordinance 18-, adopting 2019 Budget — Chelsie Taylor
5. Admin Report: LTAC Recommendations to Council — Chelsie Taylor
[*estimated me
Nov 20, 2018, Study Session, 6:00 p.m.
1. Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins
2. Info Item: Department Reports
Nov 27, 2018 — Meeting Cancelled — Thanksgiving Holiday
Dec 4, 2018, Study Session, 6:00 p.m.
1. Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins
Dec 11, 2018, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m.
1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes)
2. Proposed Fee Resolution for 2019 — Chelsie Taylor
3. Motion Consideration: Award of Lodging Tax for 2019 — Chelsie Taylor
Dec 18, 2018, Study Session, 6:00 p.m.
1. Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins
2. Info Item: Department Reports
No Meeting: Tuesday, December 25, 2018, and no meeting Tuesday, January 1, 2019
*time for public or Council comments not included
OTHER PENDING AND/OR UPCOMING ISSUES/MEETINGS:
Aging & Long Term Care Board Appts/Interlocal
Animal Control Regulations (SVMC 7.30)
Argonne Rd Broadway to Indiana Bid Award
Barker I-90 WSDOT Interlocal, Interchange
Barker I-90 Interchange Contract
Browns Park Update
Camping in RVs
City Action Days, Olympia Feb 13-14
Compassionate SV
Donation Recognition
Electrical Inspections
Health District Re SV Stats
Land Use Notice Requirements
Legislative Delegation Meeting
Draft Advance Agenda 9/6/2018 11:12:41 AM
[due Tue Oct 231
(5 minutes)
[due Tue Oct 301
(15 minutes)
(5 minutes)
[due Tue Nov 6l
(15 minutes)
(5 minutes)
(10 minutes)
(10 minutes)
(15 minutes)
eting: 55 mins]
[due Tue Nov 131
(5 minutes)
[due Tue Nov 261
(5 minutes)
[due Tue Dec 41
(5 minutes)
(10 minutes)
(15 minutes)
[due Tue Dec 111
(5 minutes)
Legislative Remote Testimony (Chambers)
Naming City Facilities Protocol
Neighborhood Restoration Program
Park Lighting
Police Dept. Quarterly Rpt (April, July, Oct, Jan)
Sign Ordinance
Snowplows, sidewalk snow removal, etc.
St. Illumination (ownership, cost, location)
St. O&M Pavement Preservation
Sullivan Bridge Project Completion Update
Tobacco 21 Resolution
Town Hall Conversations
TPA
Utility Facilities in ROW
Page 2 of 2