The URL can be used to link to this page

2019, 04-16 Study Session AGENDA SPOKANE VALLEY CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION FORMAT Tuesday,April 16,2019 6:00 p.m. CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10210 E Sprague Avenue (Please Silence Your Cell Phones During the Meeting) CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL APPROVAL OF AGENDA ACTION ITEM: 1. Motion Consideration: Bid Award,Knox Sidewalk,Hutchinson to Sargent—Gloria Mantz [public comment] NON-ACTION ITEMS: DISCUSSION LEADER SUBJECT/ACTIVITY GOAL 2. Chief Werner,Deputy Moman; Crisis Co-response Team Discussion/Information Mental Health Professional Holly Report Keller; Frontier Behavioral Health Chief Operating Officer Jan Dobbs 3. Cary Driskell,John Hohman Federal Legislative Agenda Discussion/Information 4. Lori Barlow, Mike Basinger Comprehensive Plan Amendments Discussion/Information 5. Mike Basinger Community Economic Revitalization Discussion/Information Board(CERB),Planning Grant 6.Mayor Higgins Advance Agenda Discussion/Information 7.Mayor Higgins Council Check in Discussion/Information 8.John Hohman Deputy City Manager Comments Discussion/Information 9. Executive Session : Review the Performance of a Public Employee [RCW 42.30.110(1)(g)] ADJOURN Study Session Agenda,April 16,2019 Page 1 of 1 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: April 16, 2019 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ® new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Motion Consideration: Bid Award — Knox Avenue Sidewalk (Sargent to Hutchinson) — CIP #0279 GOVERNING LEGISLATION: SVMC 3.35.10 — Contract Authority PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: • 10/24/2017: Council held a Public Hearing for the 2018 Community Development Block Grant Program, which included this project. • 6/5/2018: Council passed Resolution 18-003 adopting the 2019-2024 Six Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP), which included this project. • 1/29/19: Council passed Resolution 19-002 amending the 2019 TIP, which included this project. • 2/5/19: Administration Report provided an update on the project status. BACKGROUND: This project will install new sidewalk, curb and gutter, and widen the pavement on the south side of Knox Avenue between Sargent Road and Hutchinson Avenue. The stormwater division identified needed stormwater improvements that can be done in conjunction with the project. The project costs and budget are: Project Costs Project Budget Preliminary Engineering $ 45,626 City Fund 303 $ 77,210 Construction Bid Award $ 375,985 City Fund 402 $ 25,650 10% Constr. Contingency $ 37,000 City Fund 403 $ 90,000 Construction Engineering $ 21,675 CDBG Grant $ 287,426 Total estimated costs $ 480,286 Total Budget $ 480,286 The Engineer's Estimate for construction was $467,525. The project was advertised on March 22, 2019, and bids were opened on Friday April 5, 2019. Three bids were received. N.A. Degerstrom submitted the lowest responsive, responsible bid of $375,985.15, which is $91,539.85 below the Engineer's Estimate. Cameron-Riley and W.M. Winkler also submitted bids. A copy of the Bid Tabulation is attached. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: There are sufficient funds in the budget to construct the project. OPTIONS: 1) Move to award the contract to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder, or 2) take other appropriate action. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to award the Knox Avenue Sidewalk Project CIP #0279 to N.A. Degerstrom in the amount of $375,985.15 and authorize the City Manager to finalize and execute the construction contract. STAFF CONTACT: Bill Helbig PE, City Engineer ATTACHMENTS: 4/5/19 CIP #0279 Bid Tabulation BID TABULATION Spill ne Knox Sidewalk-Hutchinson to Sargent 400.1110Valley Project CIP No.0279 Engineers Estimate NA Degerstrom,Inc. Wm.Winkler Co. Cameron-Reilly,LLC. Item It Units Quantity Unit Price I Total Cost Unit Price I Total Cost Unit Price I Total Cost Unit Price I Total Cost Schedule A-Sidewalk Improvements 100 MOBILIZATION L.S. 1 $45,000.00 $45,000.00 $37,000.00 $37,000.00 $32,471.00 $32,471.00 $17,000.00 $17,000.00 101 CONSTRUCTION SURVEYING L.S. 1 $9,000.00 $9,000.00 $5,250.00 $5,250.00 $6,615.00 $6,615.00 $7,500.00 $7,500.00 102 SPCC PLAN L.S. 1 $800.00 $800.00 $525.00 $525.00 $509.00 $509.00 $750.00 $750.00 103 MINOR CHANGE CALC. 1 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 104 PROJECT TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL L.S. 1 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 $17,475.00 $17,475.00 $6,476.00 $6,476.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 105 PORTABLE CHANGEABLE MESSAGE SIGN HR. 2928 $3.00 $8,784.00 $2.30 $6,734.40 $3.70 $10,833.60 $5.00 $14,640.00 106 DOCUMENTATION COMPLIANCE EST. 1 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 107 REMOVAL OF STRUCTURES AND OBSTRUCTIONS L.S. 1 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $8,400.00 $8,400.00 $374.50 $374.50 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 108 CLEARING AND GRUBBING L.S. 1 $5,500.00 $5,500.00 $4,250.00 $4,250.00 $5,498.00 $5,498.00 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 109 EROSION CONTROL L.S. 1 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 $3,085.00 $3,085.00 $915.00 $915.00 $1,200.00 $1,200.00 110 SAWCUT ASPHALT PAVEMENT LF-IN 3210 $0.50 $1,605.00 $1.05 $3,370.50 $0.60 $1,926.00 $1.00 $3,210.00 111 REMOVE ASPHALT PAVEMENT S.Y. 570 $10.00 $5,700.00 $4.85 $2,764.50 $10.20 $5,814.00 $12.00 $6,840.00 112 REMOVE CEMENT CONCRETE CURB L.F. 650 $10.00 $6,500.00 $4.45 $2,892.50 $5.90 $3,835.00 $12.00 $7,800.00 113 REMOVE CEMENT CONCRETE SIDEWALK/DRIVEWAY APPROACH S.Y. 130 $20.00 $2,600.00 $13.00 $1,690.00 $33.30 $4,329.00 $12.00 $1,560.00 114 ROADWAY EXCAVATION INCL.HAUL C.Y. 430 $40.00 $17,200.00 $50.50 $21,715.00 $48.90 $21,027.00 $40.75 $17,522.50 115 CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE,2 IN.DEPTH S.Y. 9 $10.00 $90.00 $12.25 $110.25 $35.30 $317.70 $100.00 $900.00 116 CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE,3 IN.DEPTH S.Y. 20 $12.50 $250.00 $10.20 $204.00 $21.10 $422.00 $100.00 $2,000.00 117 CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE,6 IN.DEPTH S.Y. 1070 $20.00 $21,400.00 $16.95 $18,136.50 $15.90 $17,013.00 $12.00 $12,840.00 118 HMA CL.3/8"PG 645-280.25 FT.DEPTH S.Y. 1070 $35.00 $37,450.00 $18.75 $20,062.50 $18.80 $20,116.00 $20.00 $21,400.00 119 COMPACTION PRICE ADJUSTMENT CALC 1 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 120 JOB MIX COMPLIANCE PRICE ADJUSTMENT CALC 1 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 121 ADJUST EXISTING WATER VALVE EACH 15 $1,000.00 $15,000.00 $445.00 $6,675.00 $320.00 $4,800.00 $550.00 $8,250.00 122 UTILITY CASTING DEPTH COMPLIANCE CALC 1 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 123 CEMENT CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER L.F. 990 $25.00 $24,750.00 $20.50 $20,295.00 $26.20 $25,938.00 $31.50 $31,185.00 124 CEMENT CONC.SIDEWALK S.Y. 367 $50.00 $18,350.00 $64.00 $23,488.00 $65.80 $24,148.60 $65.00 $23,855.00 125 CEMENT CONC.DRIVEWAY APPROACH S.Y. 123 $70.00 $8,610.00 $83.00 $10,209.00 $112.00 $13,776.00 $80.00 $9,840.00 126 CEMENT CONC.CURB RAMP TYPE SINGLE DIRECTION EACH 5 $2,000.00 $10,000.00 $2,450.00 $12,250.00 $2,345.00 $11,725.00 $2,500.00 $12,500.00 127 CEMENT CONC.CURB RAMP TYPE PARALLEL A EACH 1 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $3,175.00 $3,175.00 $2,350.00 $2,350.00 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 128 CEMENT CONC.PEDESTRIAN CURB L.F. 140 $30.00 $4,200.00 $21.65 $3,031.00 $28.20 $3,948.00 $30.00 $4,200.00 129 CEMENT CONC.CURB WALL L.F. 20 $50.00 $1,000.00 $48.75 $975.00 $68.60 $1,372.00 $75.00 $1,500.00 130 CEMENT CONC.MOW CURB L.F. 10 $25.00 $250.00 $31.00 $310.00 $27.00 $270.00 $75.00 $750.00 131 PERMANENT SIGNING L.S. 1 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $935.00 $935.00 $920.50 $920.50 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 132 SOD INSTALLATION S.Y. 420 $17.00 $7,140.00 $10.50 $4,410.00 $8.35 $3,507.00 $12.00 $5,040.00 133 TOPSOIL TYPE C,2 IN.DEPTH S.Y. 430 $10.00 $4,300.00 $4.45 $1,913.50 $9.00 $3,870.00 $6.00 $2,580.00 134 IRRIGATION SYSTEM REVISION EACH 4 $1,000.00 $4,000.00 $1,150.00 $4,600.00 $1,532.00 $6,128.00 $1,250.00 $5,000.00 135 REMOVE AND RE-INSTALL CHAIN LINK FENCE L.F. 130 $25.00 $3,250.00 $30.00 $3,900.00 $25.00 $3,250.00 $40.00 $5,200.00 136 TEMPORARY FENCE L.F. 130 $7.50 $975.00 $5.25 $682.50 $8.70 $1,131.00 $13.00 $1,690.00 137 MAILBOX SUPPORT,TYPE 1 EACH 6 $500.00 $3,000.00 $460.00 $2,760.00 $358.00 $2,148.00 $600.00 $3,600.00 Schedule A Subtotal $320,707.00 $278,277.15 $272,776.90 $274,855.50 Schedule B -Stormwater Improvements 200 MOBILIZATION L.S. 1 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $2,350.00 $2,350.00 $836.00 $836.00 $4,100.00 $4,100.00 201 TRENCH EXCAVATION SAFETY SYSTEM L.S. 1 $500.00 $500.00 $750.00 $750.00 $611.00 $611.00 $750.00 $750.00 202 MINOR CHANGE CALC. 1 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 203 SAWCUT ASPHALT PAVEMENT LF-IN 510 $0.50 $255.00 $1.05 $535.50 $0.60 $306.00 $1.00 $510.00 204 STORM WATER PATCH REMOVAL S.Y. 50 $10.00 $500.00 $4.10 $205.00 $11.10 $555.00 $15.00 $750.00 205 POTHOLE UTILITY EACH 2 $1,000.00 $2,000.00 $805.00 $1,610.00 $375.00 $750.00 $250.00 $500.00 206 ABANDON EXISTING DRYWELL EACH 4 $2,500.00 $10,000.00 $975.00 $3,900.00 $2,325.00 $9,300.00 $1,000.00 $4,000.00 207 REMOVE EXISTING CATCH BASIN EACH 2 $1,000.00 $2,000.00 $125.00 $250.00 $715.00 $1,430.00 $1,000.00 $2,000.00 208 REMOVE STORM DRAIN PIPE L.F. 12 $30.00 $360.00 $14.25 $171.00 $42.50 $510.00 $50.00 $600.00 209 ADJUST EXISTING CATCH BASIN OR DRYWELL EACH 1 $800.00 $800.00 $445.00 $445.00 $240.00 $240.00 $700.00 $700.00 210 REPLACE EXISTING FRAME&GRATE WITH SOLID'STORM'FRAME&COVER EACH 1 $650.00 $650.00 $635.00 $635.00 $658.50 $658.50 $600.00 $600.00 211 CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE,6 IN.DEPTH S.Y. 50 $20.00 $1,000.00 $11.75 $587.50 $21.70 $1,085.00 $15.00 $750.00 212 HMA CL.3/8"PG 645-280.25 FT.DEPTH S.Y. 50 $35.00 $1,750.00 $18.75 $937.50 $18.80 $940.00 $20.00 $1,000.00 213 JOB MIX COMPLIANCE PRICE ADJUSTMENT CALC 1 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 214 COMPACTION PRICE ADJUSTMENT CALC 1 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 215 SPILL CONTROL SEPARATOR EACH 2 $300.00 $600.00 $500.00 $1,000.00 $242.50 $485.00 $300.00 $600.00 216 PRECAST CONCRETE DRYWELL TYPE A WITH SOLID COVER EACH 1 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $5,100.00 $5,100.00 $4,074.00 $4,074.00 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 217 PRECAST CONCRETE DRYWELL TYPE B WITH TYPE 4 GRATE EACH 2 $7,000.00 $14,000.00 $5,450.00 $10,900.00 $4,111.00 $8,222.00 $3,500.00 $7,000.00 218 SWALE EXCAVATION INCL.HAUL C.Y. 880 $30.00 $26,400.00 $23.10 $20,328.00 $27.90 $24,552.00 $35.00 $30,800.00 219 TOPSOIL,TYPE A,12 IN.DEPTH S.Y. 170 $20.00 $3,400.00 $22.10 $3,757.00 $23.80 $4,046.00 $21.00 $3,570.00 220 TOPSOIL,TYPE A,2 IN.DEPTH S.Y. 730 $10.00 $7,300.00 $4.45 $3,248.50 $6.00 $4,380.00 $5.00 $3,650.00 221 SOD INSTALLATION S.Y. 900 $17.00 $15,300.00 $10.50 $9,450.00 $8.00 $7,200.00 $11.00 $9,900.00 222 CONCRETE SPLASH PAD S.Y. 5 $500.00 $2,500.00 $193.00 $965.00 $170.00 $850.00 $100.00 $500.00 223 COMBINATION INLET EACH 5 $2,000.00 $10,000.00 $1,450.00 $7,250.00 $1,772.00 $8,860.00 $2,500.00 $12,500.00 224 CATCH BASIN TYPE 1 EACH 2 $2,000.00 $4,000.00 $1,315.00 $2,630.00 $1,751.00 $3,502.00 $2,500.00 $5,000.00 225 CURB INLET TOP,TYPE 1 EACH 1 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $810.00 $810.00 $1,517.00 $1,517.00 $1,700.00 $1,700.00 226 DUCTILE IRON STORM SEWER PIPE 10 IN.DIA. L.F. 280 $80.00 $22,400.00 $49.25 $13,790.00 $71.70 $20,076.00 $65.00 $18,200.00 227 DUCTILE IRON STORM SEWER PIPE 8 IN.DIA. L.F. 50 $80.00 $4,000.00 $48.20 $2,410.00 $80.00 $4,000.00 $65.00 $3,250.00 228 CONNECTION TO EXISTING DRYWELL EACH 1 $1,200.00 $1,200.00 $900.00 $900.00 $886.50 $886.50 $750.00 $750.00 229 POROUS GRAVEL SHOULDER S.F. 360 $15.00 $5,400.00 $7.75 $2,790.00 $4.10 $1,476.00 $10.00 $3,600.00 Schedule B Subtotal $146,818.00 $97,708.00 $111,351.00 $119,783.00 Project Totals = $467,525.00 M $375,985.15 SIMMUMI $394,638.50 CHECKLIST Bid Proposal Checklistx x x Competitive bids were opened on April 5,2019. I hereby certify Bid Proposal Form x x x to the best of my ability that this is a true and correct bid Addendas Acknowledgedx x x tabulation for the Knox Avenue Sidewalk Project,CIP#0279. By: Glenn Ritter,PE Cert for Wage Payment Compliance x x x Contractor Infox x x Bid Qualificationsx x x Bid Bondx x x Reps&Certs x x x CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: April 16, 2019 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ® admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Crisis Co-Response Team Report GOVERNING LEGISLATION: PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: none BACKGROUND: Police Chief Mark Werner, along with Spokane County Deputy Dan Moman, Frontier Behavior Health Operating Officer Jan Dobbs, and Frontier Behavior Health Professional Holly Keller, will discuss the Community Diversion Unit, which has been made possible through a partnership with Spokane County Sheriffs Office, Spokane Valley Police Department, and Frontier Behavior Health. OPTIONS: Discussion RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Discussion BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: STAFF CONTACT: Police Chief Mark Werner ATTACHMENTS: PowerPoint Presentation Community,„, ,„ ,„ ,„ 4441 Diversion UnitAlp ( CDU ) Spokane County Sheriff's Office Spokane Valley Police Department Frontier Behavioral Health Community Diversion Unit ► Made possible through a partnership with ► Frontier Behavioral Health (FBH ) ► Spokane Valley Police Department (SVPD) Spokane County Sheriff's Office (SCSO) ► Introduction : ► FBH Chief Operating Officer Jan Dobbs P g SVPD Chief Mark Werner Community Diversion Unit ► Team Introduction : ► SCSO Deputy Dan Moman ► 6 years with SCSO ► SCSO CIT Coordinator, Bachelors in Psychology Taser Instructor, Master Excited Delirium Instructor FBH Mental Health Professional Holly Keller 6 years in the mental health field t, ► Master in Clinical Psychology from EWU E�3 / ► Experience as a Crisis Response Advocate for sexual assault victims, support staff in group homes, and a child and family therapist. 3 Community Diversion Unit ► The Mission of the team is to: ► Increase safety Diversion from the criminal justice system and emergency departments for. . . ► Connection to community resources to support the vulnerable in our community where they are. Based on the Memphis Model of Crisis Intervention Team response. 4 Community Diversion Unit ► Grant Overview \! w • State funds dispersed by the Washington Association of Sheriffs Et Police Chiefs (WASPC) ► SCSO proactively Et competitively applied for and was awarded funding from October 2018 to June 2019. • Grant monies pay for FBH MHP Keller to ride full time with Deputy Moman. • 4111 The _ - Difference � . in Response How does the team differ in response from a regular patrol officer? 0. • 1111) 6 S1 "restricting the access of some people to useful or potentially useful health services due to budgetary limitation". (Keliddar, Et al. 2017) Service Services are limited and rationed. The nature of police and other Rationing public service work. Largest area impact the team has is time spent with those in crisis. Officers routinely resolve crisis calls proficiently, but are limited with time, information, and resources. Community Diversion Unit ► The difference in response: Time ► Team spends an average of 47 minutes on crisis calls to stabilize. ► Crisis is usually time limited (fight/flight response). Time to rally support, help regulate emotions by allowing time to venting, supportive listening, creation of safety plans, and making appointments, etc. ► Very few persons are moved to inpatient if hospitalized, creating a safe and supportive environment is key to heading of future crisis. 8 Community Diversion Unit ► The difference in response: Hospital Time ► The team works with local hospitals to facilitate care. ► Not uncommon for officers to spend over 3 hours sitting with the person in crisis in the emergency department taking away from response to criminal calls. ► The team averages 16 minutes from doors to bed. ► This allows the team to return to crisis work to divert and connect more persons with support. ► This relieves officers in the field and lessens burden at ER. ► Ambulance Diversion: Less cost for person in crisis. 9 Community Diversion Unit The difference in response: High Utilizers ► The team makes efforts to check in and support persons with limited support after the crisis. ► Often frequent utilizers of emergency services "Bill" with over 200 clear calls in the last twoY ears ► "Becky" person who is paranoid and uses systems ► "Tom" threatening "suicide by cop" 10 Community Diversion Unit The difference in response: Informed Response During a crisis state law allows certain information sharing between mental health systems and law enforcement. This informed response increases safety. Both systems are immediately accessible in the patrol car and the flow of information is invaluable. ► Safety plan and "Zippy" IM. Community Diversion Unit \ . The difference in response: Training Iff ► Team cross trains together both on the job and in the classroom. ► Common risk assessment (C-SSRS) Motivational Interviewing (MI ) ► Law Enforcement In-Service training and FBH monthly 1; .- (CDU) training. 7. ► Combined these increase the team effectiveness 12 Community Diversion Unit The difference in response: Resources ► The team uniquely has access and familiarity with many community resources. FBH has worked to provided dedicated shelter beds for CDU teams, among other resources. Team resources such as VA Emergency Room for tO Veterans, detox, shelters, and other resources that officers may not be able to access or are familiar with. Community Diversion Unit The difference in response: ERPO ► Extreme Risk Protection Orders ► This type of order allows a family or law enforcement agency to petition for removal of firearms temporarily and restrict purchasing. This is a relatively new type of order that only the team has completed and successfully defended in court. ► "Kill List" ► "I was going to kill myself today" lel';',--, -:.'.', , ., -- I Data Driven y,F/'':::: --'' K and Response , , . c 1 . , e. Proven .=,t ... _ I How the team uses data to deploy and collection of data showing outcomes. Community Diversion Unit Team is data driven . ► Data collected from a 22 month period prior to the grant resulted in 1806 suicidal call types. ► This information indicates that crisis work done between Noon and 10 PM would have the biggest impact. The following illustrates peak days and time period. Suicidal Calls By The Hour Suicidal calls by the hour over a 22 month period 140 133 127 123 120 113 115 1 110 10• 102 100 94 88 :8 1 8 80 71 73 75 58 60 46 Sk 40 37 39 30 31 30 20 24 20 17 RS 0 CP DO 0O 0O DO 0' CP (P DO Cc' CP DO 0' CP CP 6) Cc' CP DO 0O CP CP 0' CP CO imiti 17 Suicidal Calls By The Week Day Over last 22 months 300 294 290 282 280 270 260 58 257 25' 250 241 240 230 223 223 220 210 200 Saturday Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday 18 Grant Outcomes to Date : 3 / 31 / 19 ► 265 Grant Contacts to date (81 ) 3.2 avg/2. 5 � ► 231 Diversions (87%) 31 Emergent Detentions (11 .6%) ► Arrested: 3 (1 . 1 %) ► Use of Force: No force on grant contacts beyond hand cuffing and soft restraints. ► Extreme Risk Protection Orders: 2 ► Motivational Interviewing: 98% use of skills on calls 19 Co- Responder Crisis Response Unit Actual Diversions (as of 3 /28/ 19) • A diversion where a normal patrol response would have more than likely resulted in a emergent detention or arrest. Actual Emergent Detention Diversions: 38 • Actual Arrest Diversions: 21 • These 38 diversions saved an estimated 114 hours for patrol time if they had been taken to a hospital and report writing time. Co- Responder Crisis Response Unit ► Time saved and officers relieved : 3 /31 / 19 ► Time saved for unincorporated Spokane County: 8, 154 minutes ► Time saved for City of Spokane Valley: 4, 179 minutes ► Overall time saved: 12,333 Minutes ► Over all officers relieved and back on the street: 150 Requested: 40 times (tracking started 01 /01 / 19) ► Ambulance Diversions: 20 (tracking started 12/ 1 / 18) 21 Co- Responder Crisis Response Unit ► Community Feedback ► "Where was this program a year ago" ► Community members are often surprised at the level of response and care and comment on the helpfulness of the team. ► Officers appreciate the support and the ability to connect persons with more resources through the team. 1, Feedback from hospitals and other community resources have been positive. JA ; 1,7-i l'-_,-..::---- , { • rir Closingec, } . _ Questions . ,..,...,„„fliii;...,,, __, _ , ...or,,,,e,„ - =.__...,,, -,,,:-,,,„ _ - , s„. _ _______, ..,..,.._, , ,, . ..., , ,. ...„..., ....... . ._ ..„,„...„...„, ,.„ „ ,,:„. ,__....,:,,,,47.:::;.,:: Co- Responder Crisis Response Unit Summary The team is capable of efficiently and safely responding to a vulnerable population and providing a higher level of care in the field than possible in any other form. The Team also provides training and support to officer in the z field to increase the overall response to crisis situations. Deputy Moman: dmoman@spokanesheriff.org CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: April 16,2019 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑consent ❑old business ❑new business ❑public hearing ❑information ®admin.report ❑pending legislation ❑executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Administrative report—discussion of draft Federal Agenda. GOVERNING LEGISLATION: Not applicable. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: June 12,2018 Budget Workshop request from Council that staff initiate the process for identifying and contracting with a government affairs firm that specializes in lobbying at the federal level,and specifically has expertise in federal transportation funding; administrative report July 24,2018.November 6,2018 administrative report; and November 13,2018 approval of contract with Cardinal Infrastructure,LLC. BACKGROUND:The City executed its agreement with Cardinal Infrastructure in November,2018. Since that time, staff has worked internally to identify appropriate items for inclusion on a proposed draft federal lobbying agenda for consideration by the Council. In doing so, staff relied upon our knowledge and experience in working on the City's legislative agenda at the state level,as well as our understanding of the budgetary goals of the Council. Staff also discussed options with Bennett Resnick of Cardinal Infrastructure on several occasions to get input. The primary goal in contracting for a federal lobbyist was to try to get additional funding for large infrastructure projects. As such, the draft Federal Agenda identifies four major capital projects of importance to the City that we are seeking funding assistance with: Pines Road Grade Separation Project, the Sullivan Road Corridor Projects, the Barker Road Corridor Projects, and the Argonne Road Corridor Projects. Attached are four one-page handouts related to each project. Additionally, the draft Federal Agenda requests changes to the way federal capital project funding occurs, including regulatory requirements,which make the process unnecessarily cumbersome and expensive. Mr. Resnick from Cardinal Infrastructure is joining us this evening from Washington D.C. Mr. Resnick will assist us with the discussion on what information the Council may ultimately want to include in the final adopted Federal Agenda, as well as providing additional information on what he and his firm provide to the City to accomplish its goals. In prior discussions with Mr. Resnick, he identified that the Council should consider including between two and five capital projects for the agenda,which fits what you have before you for discussion. Once Council adopts a 2019 Federal Agenda,it will be communicated to our federal legislative delegation, the United States Department of Transportation, and the Federal Railroad Administration, as well as other relevant federal agencies. Additionally,it will be used by Council and staff when they travel to Washington D.C. May 7-9 to assist in their efforts to accomplish the goals identified in the adopted 2019 Federal Agenda. OPTIONS: (1) Consensus to place on future agenda for motion consideration; or(2) take other action as appropriate. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Consensus to place on future agenda for motion consideration. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS:The contracted amount is$78,000 annually,plus City costs for travel expenses to and from Washington D.C. STAFF CONTACT:John Hohman,Deputy City Manager;Cary Driskell,City Attorney;Bennett Resnick, Cardinal Infrastructure,LLC. ATTACHMENTS: Draft 2019 Federal Agenda with four one-page handouts for capital projects. SjöIL1ine 10210 E Sprague Avenue • Spokane Valley WA 99206 Phone: (509)720-5000 •Fax: (509)720-5075 •www.spokanevalley.org April 16,2019 DRAFT: 2019 Federal Legislative Agenda The following provides brief summaries for each of the City's priority projects included in Council's approved,2019 Federal Legislative Agenda. Pines Road/BNSF Railway Grade Separation Project(GSP) - $29 Million: The Pines Road/BNSF Railway GSP will replace an at-grade rail crossing on Pines Road(SR 27)with an underpass at the BNSF Railway tracks.The project accommodates BNSF Railway's future mainline track expansion that will provide a second mainline at Pines Road. The project will also improve the intersection of two state highways, Pines Road (SR 27) and Trent Avenue (SR 290), with either a roundabout or an upgraded signalized intersection.The existing project limits experience an average of 60 trains and 34,000 vehicles per day.In 2017,given an average train delay of four minutes per train,vehicles experienced over 27,000 hours of delay. Additionally, the Pines & Trent intersection experienced 27 collisions from 2014 to 2017, some of which resulted from vehicles delayed by train traffic at the Pines/BNSF crossing. The Pines Road/BNSF crossing is ranked 12th for improvement in Washington State by the State Joint Transportation Committee. The state has placed it first on its list of unfunded at-grade crossing projects. Sullivan Road Corridor Projects—Interstate 90 to Wellesley Avenue- $35 Million: The Sullivan Road Corridor is a regionally significant corridor serving local,regional,and interstate traffic connections. This corridor is a vital arterial link providing service to the Spokane Industrial Park, Central Pre-Mix,Inland Asphalt,Inland Empire Distribution Systems and many other industrial,commercial and freight businesses. This corridor is also the terminus of the Spokane County's Bigelow Gulch Road Project, which is expected to be constructed by 2022. The Bigelow Gulch Project will link freight and commuter traffic between north Spokane to Interstate 90 (I-90) through Spokane Valley. The Bigelow Gulch Road project is expected to nearly double the peak hour traffic volumes on Sullivan Road at the Trent Avenue(SR 290)interchange. These travel demands require a series of transportation projects along the corridor: • Reconstruction of the Sullivan Road and Marietta Avenue Intersection Project and provide two westbound left turn lanes on Marietta Avenue to accommodate the growing traffic volumes. • Widen Sullivan Road from Wellesley Avenue to Trent Avenue (SR 290)to five lanes. • Installation of continuous roadway lighting between Wellesley Avenue and Trent Avenue (SR 290). • Replacement of the existing diamond interchange of Sullivan Road over Trent Avenue (SR 290) to accommodate future growth in the region. The Sullivan Road/Trent Avenue Overpass Project will consider improving Sullivan Road's existing four-lane crossing over Trent Avenue to a seven- lane crossing with fully protected, signalized intersections, or maintaining a reduced number of lanes but incorporating two roundabouts at the overpass's two intersections. • Installation of multi-modal accommodations to facilitate non-motorized transportation through the corridor,connecting people's homes to nearby schools,businesses, and parks. The City is currently underway with a 2019 update to the 2015 Sullivan Road Corridor Study that updates and re-evaluates project alternatives and will provide clear direction in 2019. Barker Road Corridor Projects—Appleway to Mission -$45 Million: The Barker Road corridor is located near the east limits of Spokane Valley and extends from the City's north boundary at Trent Avenue(SR 290)to its south boundary at 10th Avenue.North of I-90,Barker Road provides access to over 800 acres of industrially-zoned properties and 220 acres of occupied residentially- zoned properties. There are nearly 500 acres of vacant industrial land and the City is facilitating rapid industry growth in the next three years along the corridor. The area south of I-90 is experiencing extensive residential growth within the City, within unincorporated Spokane County, and in neighboring Liberty Lake to the east. The City has nearly 1,000 acres of residential and mixed-use properties while Spokane County and Liberty Lake have another 2,000 combined acres of residential properties in the corridor. Barker Road accommodates almost all of this traffic. Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT)recognizes that an improved interchange and bridge overpass at Barker Road and Interstate 90 is required by year 2030, but funding continues to be a challenge. During peak hours, this interchange creates vehicle back-ups for the length of the off-ramps, stopping the east/west flow of I-90. The following improvements are required at the interchange: • WSDOT will provide interim improvements by 2021 at the eastbound I-90 interchange by providing a single-lane roundabout and additional approach lanes that will extend this failing intersection's lifespan for five to seven years. However, a double-lane roundabout is ultimately required to meet the City's and WSDOT's required level of service. • WSDOT and the City of Spokane Valley are partnering in 2019 to design interim improvements at the westbound I-90 interchange. These improvements are similar in scope and life to what is identified for the eastbound interchange. Funding for the construction of these interim improvements has not yet been secured. • The full build out of the interchange will require that the existing, deficient, two-lane bridge be reconstructed to accommodate four lanes of traffic and acceptable clearance over I-90. Additionally, final configuration requires that the single-lane roundabouts at the interchange be retrofitted to double lane roundabouts. The area south of I-90 is experiencing a significant increase in residential growth within Spokane County and Liberty Lake. This increase also includes a new high school to the southeast of the project interchange. North of I-90 in the City's northeast industrial area, approximately 700 new jobs are expected in the next five years. Continued growth is expected in the foreseeable future,particularly with the 2021 completion of the Barker Road/BNSF Railway Grade Separation Project that provides a roundabout at Trent Avenue (SR 290), as well as triggering other additional required improvements: • Widening Barker to five lanes between Mission Avenue and Appleway Boulevard. • Intersection Improvements: o Sprague Avenue &Barker Avenue o 4th Avenue &Barker Avenue o 8th Avenue &Barker Avenue • Reconstruction of Barker Avenue between Appleway Boulevard and the south city limit. Argonne Road Corridor Projects—Interstate 90 to Trent Avenue (SR 290)-$20 Million: Argonne Road serves the entire Spokane region, and is rated by the State's Freight and Goods Transportation System as a T-1 freight route, carrying an average annual freight in excess of 10 million tons. North and south Spokane County are linked to I-90 by the Argonne corridor,the City of Millwood is bisected by the corridor, and the congested route carries 35,000 vehicles every day, 15% of which is freight.The project supports the East Montgomery Corridor Employment Center,home to 2,500 jobs.This is truly a regional project,impacting WSDOT's I-90, the City of Spokane Valley,the Town of Millwood, and Spokane County. For planning purposes, the corridor includes six signalized intersections starting at Mission Avenue and extending north to the intersection of Trent Avenue. All six intersections fail during the morning, mid- day, and evening peak hours on any given day. A comprehensive retiming of all traffic signals will temporarily help alleviate congestion in the corridor, although this would only be a temporary fix to the corridor's congestion problem. • The existing southbound Argonne Road bridge over 1-90 is a critical bottleneck for the corridor. The deficient and undersized two-lane bridge must be replaced with a new concrete bridge that accommodates three lanes of traffic and provides adequate clearance over 1-90. Additionally,the project may align with planned WSDOT improvements at the 1-90/Argonne Road interchange where signal and lane improvements are anticipated. This bridge project will save five minutes of travel time for vehicles travelling from Trent Avenue (SR 290)to 1-90. • Lastly, given the heavy use of the corridor,the pavement condition of Argonne Road consists of failing asphalt with heavy rutting and consistent potholes. A reconstruction of the roadway is necessary to remove seven lanes of failed asphalt and replace it with a reinforced concrete pavement. Streamlining the federal aid transportation project process: Initiatives to streamline the approval process for federally funded transportation projects should be a top congressional priority. The requirements for Federal Highway Administration administered projects change too often and projects do not have vesting rights. In Washington State, the "Local Agency Guidelines Manual" establishes the statewide policies and standards to follow when using FHWA funds for transportation projects. This manual is updated twice per year, which leads to multiple changes in requirements for projects that span over a year. Generally, federally funded projects can cost up to 50% more and can take 50%to 100%longer to deliver. The process should be streamlined to add predictability to the review and approval process by allowing agencies to know what the requirements are in the beginning stages of the project. In addition, the acquisition of property rights must follow the Uniform Relocation Act, including temporary rights. These requirements are unnecessarily stringent and add thousands of dollars to project costs and months to project delivery. Agencies often pay 10 to 20 times more to acquire temporary construction rights when considering the costs of right-of-way agents for negotiations, appraisers for valuations,and the time for these negotiations and valuations to take place. Pines Road/BNSF RailwaySÔk�rrr ane Grade Separation Project Valley} 509-720-5000 A Bridging the Valley Project www.spol<anevalley.org Project focus .. e,r.,' ,,, The Pines Road/BNSF Railway Grade Separation Project is c ... located in Spokane Valley,Wash.,a city of nearly 100,000 residents.The city is situated in the largest Metropolitan Statistical Area between Seattle and Minneapolis,and home to \=* '' several large industrial parks. 2901 Me p kgft. The project will remove the existing at-grade crossing of a BNSF transcontinental rail line at Pines Road(SR 27),one of Leh Spokane Valley's busiest arterial streets.In 2018,the Freight F CVp5� gtrll, Mobility Strategic Investment Board (FMSIB) rated the Pines 8Road crossing as the highest ranked unfunded Tier 1 rail crossing in the state out of 4,171 total crossings based on ti freight mobility and safety. Eliminating the crossing is critical ' to improving vehicle and pedestrian safety, increasing freight mobility and enhancing economic vitality across the region. *,�, The crossing is adjacent to the intersection of Pines Road and Tren ii Elemen a �» '�" Trent Avenue (SR 290),which serves 34,000 vehicles per day, - 1 r ' o{' including freight trucks traveling from Canada and northern Idaho that connect to Interstate 90. Improvements to the intersection will be constructed as part of the project. 'IL44 0am .1I 1 Key improvements rovements ■ The grade separation project will replace the Pines e 1, � I Road crossing with an underpass and redesign the adjacent i i , signalized intersection of Pines and Trent. In conjunction with a grade separation project underway at the nearby Barker Road/BNSF crossing,the Pines/BNSF project Funding required will eliminate three of the city's seven at-grade crossings 2023 construction (Barker,Flora and Pines). $29 million total cost • The crossing is located 200 yards north of Trent Secured Funding-$5.1 million Elementary.The new underpass will reduce congestion and • $3.2 million set aside by the city improve safety for students, staff and parents. • $1.9 million Surface Transportation Block Grant • The existing intersection and BNSF crossing limits development of 170 acres of mixed-use or commercially- Funding shortfall zoned property,and 56 acres of prime industrial-zoned • $23.9 million property.The project will increase access to this property and generate additional economic development. Project II etails . a On aver age,58 BNSF freight trains and two Amtrak passenger trains travel through the Pines Road/BNSF at-grade crossing each day. This results in 27,000 hours of vehicle delays •a i IMOi ^ annually,and at least five vehicle collisions from 2015 to , ,, ' `' • in PIPIT - 2017.BNSF has notified the city that it plans to add a second I „ main track to the existing rail line,possibly as early as 2019.A ' second track will likely increase train traffic and vehicle delays. The grade separation project also includes improvements to - the adjacent intersection of Pines and Trent.There were 27 collisions at this intersection from 2014 to 2017.The proposed =_ alignment and intersection control(roundabout or signal)will be identified in 2019. Pines Road/BNSF crossing The project supports the"Bridging the Valley"initiative to improve safety,create more effective freight routes and Public safety and livability spur economic development. enhancements Economic benefits The project will significantly enhance vehicle and pedestrian Completion of the Pines Road/BNSF project will improve safety, likely saving lives. In addition, it will greatly improve access to 170 acres of nearby mixed-use or commercially- neighborhood livability.Overall the project: zoned property,and 56 acres of prime industrial-zoned • Eliminates the Pines Road/BNSF crossing—saving property that is currently undeveloped(see graphic below). three hours per day(average gate-down time) in Over time,the projected economic and tax impacts of this vehicle wait time. development include: • Improves commercial and residential traffic flow. • $1.3 billion in total economic output in Spokane •Enhances access to 1-90 and other main arterials in the County($686 million in direct spending) Spokane Valley transportation network. • 8,719 new jobs supported in Spokane County(4,312 ■ Increases access to key emergency services located on direct job impacts) the south side of the city. • $8.2 million in new general fund taxes to Spokane • Enhances access to Trent Elementary for school buses, Valley(25 years at 4 percent) as well as students and families traveling to and from • $101.9 million in new general fund taxes to surrounding neighborhoods. Washington State(25 years at 4 percent) • Eliminates 15 minutes of train horn noise per day at the crossing(based on 58 freight trains and two Undeveloped ;� Amtrak passenger trains per day). Commercial 4'1 ' Undeveloped t i h °1 Streamlining the approval process for federally-funded transportation �. .< Residential ,.i• moi.. �=��;A,„,(::: " °, projects would make this(and other projects)easier to administer, ! P savingtime and money.Federal! funded projects can cost u to 50 O Project Site �' L iw I , , -,.: -0 Y p 1 p percent more and take 50 to 100 percent longer to deliver because of ri,„�� constant and extensive changes to the federal requirements.Initiatives to streamline review and approval processes for transportation projects 4111 4 should be a top congressional priority. A ,,, � • 44 , i City of Spokane Valley .� �. ••• " � 10210 E.Sprague Avenue ..,. o.-- ', >,� Spokane Valley,WA 99206 r 1[,' 01 IFr ,111 - Washington State r - } 509-720-5000 Undeveloped Properties www.spokanevalley.org April 11,2019 Sullivan Road CITY Or ►.��polialle Corridor Projects Vallee 509-720-5000 State Route 290 (Trent) to Mission www.spokanevailey.org 6 .x .yx+ i '7 'l' _.-meq aT,Yx a:4 ' { �, fF 1iµ s�1 � Sy'y *4 ` ■ �:.r « , 'y '' I I �'". * Project focus gr; .4 , ark.. �-40 ' k1 yt � • Ok. .I gym4' a,' ,, " "M:, t The Sullivan Road Corridor serves local, regional and ;,, "-� :w, � ,� interstate transportation networks"This corridor is the ►� i ' r V.. tI 'L `1.`'t'elf+ E �'s,rru terminus of Spokane Count-y's Bigelow Gulch Road �, ,,,,'2.2%* ',� ^ l'** M;ry �`F ��' _ Project expected to be constructed by 2022.The r 1 r .,,,,, i *' lk 1 ,lis �._� ' " ,. k_ , � ,..,.i.,-* �F_:: :0,-",,,, '*, *3, Bigelow Gulch Project will link freight and commuter �� ya ;.k. , * 'i : ' . „s` •. r traffic from north Spokane County to Interstate 90 (I- * ;.- .- °; a>yx. . 4"' a tel•Y IIl_� •` . i r ; w 'I 90)through Spokane Valley and will nearly double the x ' . ' � ' peak-hour traffic volumes on Sullivan Road at the Trent ' � ' aJU_ b "' 1'c ___I Avenue (SR 290) interchange. ,,,, {S ,cal ' Ili 4 p a � _ '""'� `� ,i ‘-t-' ' �' 1:' i t�aNi°J�y'1�G`i f �' I�11111111* ^i�1, :tai"l' -, I s F a . , " I II_ , -; HkfieTThis corridor is a vital arterial link providing service - - " "- `' to a robust commercial district on Indiana Ave., ��I-`°", "'4 I I ,~ x'° : "1 - �' including the Spokane Valley Mall, Spokane Industrial 4 r ',41'7,,,,,1.44%-f'.:1. '---:-,---5--„,,,-,,,a "- .-.tea d _ _ � ., ,,i-,...--_, Park, Central Pre-Mix, Inland Asphalt, Inland Empire " 1. 51: Distribution Systems and many other industrial, freight t` nX ' � ��*a �� , ��. �°� '� -'' f� "�,.. and commerical businesses. .4i-ti--mo fiYi+` N { 40* - • Y fig;" - �; = ,-, o 47} . �.. . , - Key improvements 1 1��f e- .'Y' 'Y p I s "" * "I �-*I " ' '" - N Replace the existing diamond interchange of Sullivan #• ' . ' " * ,r.' ' °i Road over Trent Avenue (SR 290) to accommodate a �� a te` x ' " s' - ,'`. 1'• sr 4 ::: `+PM 1,T'; ,; increased capacity and future growth in the region. *� X1,7',4.7 • ' ' 'r - ''' ,, : • Reconstruct and signalize the Sullivan Road and g' / ? 1 �� r. ' Wellesley Avenue intersection. k'''''' , � s „ I, l� ' ,,; .- .i pi ■ Widen Sullivan Road from Wellesley Avenue to Trent ` � .: c4f ,3 Avenue(SR 290)to five lanes. b�; �T:� .. • Upgrade sidewalks to ADA standards. w 5i ° s am a, y, Project timeline Ir Sullivan Road Advanced Corridor Study expected in 2019 Funding ■ Bigelow Gulch Road connection expected by 2022 Total corridor cost: $70 million ■ Sullivan-Wellesley intersection planned by 2020 Funding request: $25 million for SR 290 / interchange reconstruction '":',{s .+ /amp / � f Project partners �, � , , ; ��,�, � h. .�-' P `� ■I Washington State Department of Transportation •Spokane County Streamlining the approval process for federally-funded transportation Spokane Regional Transportation Council projects would make this(and other projects)easier to administer, saving time and money. Federally-funded projects can cost up to 50 • East Valley School District#361 percent more and take 50 to 100 percent longer to deliver because • Greater Spokane Valley Chamber of Commerce of constant and extensive changes to the federal requirements. • Spokane Transit Authority Initiatives to streamline review and approval processes for transportation projects should be a top congressional priority. Project det . iii 3 We have had made significant a� x investments in the Sullivan '—� * Corridor and continue to make40 \ Washington State improvements to accomodate growth.Area projects include: f Queen t,g I A O RECONSTRUCTION - Funded- Wellesley to Forkerh Olympic 1 . — I rt>r ic� Project cost: $8.7 million I Construction year: 2020 = ar�aa E tVaueyaw,00l ti m o o orad Faslland I — © INTERSECTION RECONSTRUCTION- Funded -At Wellesley e W E eyAve m m Heng Hera/ g .g; Upland -s.,, Remy Z U G Project cost: $1.4 million I Construction year:2020 L"ng[elow J J W He" Q RECONSTRUCTION &STREET LIGHTING- Unfundedpan _ 0 g. .. PtIth =km Rockwell Roekwei a' Trent Wellesley to SR 290 - ANITh a Project cost: $5 million I Construction year: pending m - lacrosse 1. FUNDING REQUEST Industrial Palk A x o SR 290 INTERCHANGE RECONSTRUCTION -Unfunded _ $ Industrial Parka 5 H( n r �. Project cost: $25 million I Construction year:pending a . '6 ' Industrial Perk C O INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM - Funded - Indiana to SR 290 c Industrial Park C N as Project cost:$1 million I Construction year: 2020 _ 'ndaahla,Parl F SP 4 o INTERSECTION RECONSTRUCTION - Unfunded -At Kiernan 1 Fairview 8N` E Euclid Ave -o Project cost: $2.5 million I Construction year: pending e o INTERSECTION RECONSTRUCTION -Completed -At Euclidrarietla E Project cost:$2.4 million I Construction year:2017 d INTERSECTION RECONSTRUCTION- Unfunded-At Marietta Flnra Project cost:$2.5 million I Construction year: pending 0 BRIDGE REPLACEMENT-Completed -At Spokane River iridlua Project cost: $16 million I Construction year:2015 (.Y INTERSECTION RECONSTRUCTION-Completed -At Indiana Project cost:$1.3 million I Construction year:2011 �} OwM�� ifjD INTERSECTION RECONSTRUCTION -Completed -At Broadway _ _$„...----\..,\, Project cost:$1.2 million I Construction year: 2010 a 9ngve Me�bs�q Ile - _ ocsme' eb INTERSECTION RECONSTRUCTION -Completed -At Sprague ' r caraldo__ N Project cost:$2 million I Construction year: 2010 vobn oadwalAva s BUS, BICYCLE, PEDESTRIAN UPGRADES-Unfunded r Q a - NW m SprEn95okt Ste I lel Project cost:$1 million I Construction year: pending Alio E Ail., C a lway Z VdI®ywa .2 = i m CORRIDOR FUNDING STATUS o y Dn N.” E a C n 2 rfxen (in millions) ii Main ° Wvesde O winri Riveretae E Sprague Ave 7 , Il Funded Funded a id CID m $11.1M 2nd o ' F.1 Total: $70M 1 16n& - ��d 3�2,p Huth Funded/Complete: $34M Shortfall (Unfunded): $36M Unfunded City of Spokane Valley Request: $25M $36M 51% Complete 10210 E.Sprague Avenue SCITY OF $22.9 M Spokane Valley,WA 99206 okane 33% III 509-720-5000 Valley www.spokanevalley.org April 11,2019 Argonne Road �- CITY OF Spokane Corridor Projects Valley. Mission to Trent including Interstate 90 509-720-5000 � www.spokanevalley.org im ri- L� -' ; : .m, '..w..1:„. —.1.,-,—.:,,-, . .--, a t • f r _4 Project focus r 'a ,r 'i'� -' The Argonne Road corridor is a regional gateway that is 1 � " ,?ate add.; h" " ' ' - 4. a '1 heavily congested. It is a north-south arterial that carries ",; : - V i 41 ' residential and commercial traffic from Spokane County's r r w`�' ti Bigelow Gulch and the City of Millwood into Spokane Valley 0.► - x .a.,+r • t - and 1-90. w 11' , ' -.k y" -, fes' l c"' i, _ : ; , Argonne connects I-90 to State Route 290 (Trent Avenue), 7 '°"":, " <: i1? s a main highway for commercial vehicles traveling from � a I rr y1 " '( ,111l1 w — EE'7: r northern Idaho and Canada.The corridor serves 35,000 7-1".."..� -' "% `' vehicles each day, including 4,500 commercial or freight .. ■ ice" i ti...' W ill.. l "N-'2,-,,,,,r �, 1 . t ( 1 1vehicles. It is designated Tier 1, meaning it transports more a} _ 4 :ppm _ I. -.J ` ,,,*,:-...„1- „*a 1. ""4�i`a ,_ than 10 million gross tons of freight annually. , 1� s a107129 I r N r N. lk y” 17l7. 1 4 SSI,; .'a . # ',ill' 1,` f{, i4am 1,1 �ill . ,..,r 1 " ,�,,;, ,AP . From East Mission Avenue just south of the 1-90 interchange .. 1 lira :_,-1 f- north to Trent Avenue, the corridor includes six signalized intersections.The intersections fail to move vehicles ..,a� , �A . + i "ice" ` efficiently through the corridor during peak traffic hours „- ii A .. 7- ,1 resulting in significant congestion and delays. In partnership ,. with the Washington State Department of Transportation `r 1I. ' ' - , - r (WSDOT) and other agencies,the city has identified three 0004 ," , : . r." + 1'-' �r - . primary strategies to improve congestion. *• , , z 1 , ,� �.:r 85 ,,, ■! • r Key improvements 1 4x"14 I" _ ,1 4.R iit '' . �' r Tr " :,; + y ,"l ' " J -' • Upgrade signals and timing to distribute traffic more •.0,'";',, W-- • , _fi 3 i '. effectively through the corridor, streamline traffic flow ,.., • ,1 ..--,. and reduce vehicle wait time. Funding ■ Argonne's current pavement with its potholes and heavy rutting cannot support existing traffic loads.A Total corridor cost: $20 million reconstruction of the roadway is necessary to replace the Funding request: $15 million for 1-90 failing asphalt with reinforced concrete. bridge replacement • The existing two-lane southbound bridge at 1-90 is Project partners a critical bottleneck in the Argonne Road corridor and •Washington State Department of Transportation does not provide adequate clearance over 1-90. The • City of Millwood bridge does not currently have capacity to serve heavy • Spokane County loads and is weight restricted. It must be replaced with ■Spokane Regional Transportation Council(SRTC) a new three lane concrete bridge that will provide the ■ Greater Spokane Valley Chamber of Commerce needed capacity and facilitate traffic more efficiently and safely. Pr * jest details Improvements to the Argonne * Road corridor will improve pedestrian and vehicle safety, a � Washington State and reduce travel time. Here are 1 the project components: 0 SIGNAL UPGRADES-A comprehensive upgrade and re-timing of six traffic signals in the corridor,from East Mission Avenue north to Trent Avenue,will streamline 1 MONTGOMERY AV traffic flow. New infrastructure such as signal poles, detection systems and ramp extensions will help distribute 2 traffic more efficiently, resulting in reduced congestion, vehicle wait time and noise.While some signal coordination - KNOX AV 1 can be implemented in 2019 to provide short-term relief, more significant infrastructure improvements remain 2 unfunded. 0 PAVEMENT RECONSTRUCTION -Argonne Road's ` i' 1. 2` pavement is failing due to heavy commercial vehicles ��`��n:,5�eie. and significant traffic volume.A reconstruction of the rn sn_ roadway is required to restore the pavement condition '"�e,5ieie tlr'9 m�o1 and reconfigure travel lanes as needed for signal and 2, intersection upgrades.This improvement will reduce travel MissigNA 1 times and vehicle noise. In addition, pedestrian facilities in the project area will be upgraded to meet current ADA standards. FUNDING REQUEST BRIDGE REPLACEMENT The existing conoj 1ic benefits southbound Argonne Road bridge at 1-90 is a The Argonne Road projects are located in the East bottleneck for traffic, does not provide adequate Montgomery Corridor Freight Focused Employment clearance over 1-90 and is weight restricted.The Activity Center.This area is home to more than 2,500 deficient two-lane bridge must be replaced with a new freight-related jobs spread across 450 acres, of which concrete bridge that accommodates three lanes of 96 percent are occupied. Improvements to the corridor traffic and provides sufficient clearance.A shared-use will enhance access to the national highway system and path will also be installed for pedestrian and bicycle promote commerce, use.This new bridge will save five minutes of time for vehicles traveling from Trent Avenue to 1-90.The bridge project may also align with planned WSDOT SCITYOrs improvements at theI-90 interchange where signal poliane and lane upgrades are anticipated. Valley? Streamlining the approval process for federally-funded transportation projects would make this(and other projects)easier City of Spokane Valley to administer,saving time and money. Federally-funded projects 10210 E.Sprague Avenue,Spokane Valley,WA 99206 can cost up to 50 percent more and take 50 to 100 percent longer to deliver because of constant and extensive changes to the federal 509-720-5000 requirements. Initiatives to streamline review and approval processes for transportation projects should be a top congressional priority. www.spokanevalley.org April 11,2013 Barker Roadspc.„0„,kane Corridor Projects Valley 509-720-5000A Appleway to Mission www.spokanevalley .org ... � Project focus INisslon'Ave Barker Road is near the east edge of Spokane Valley, ;, - ' and provides access to more than 800 acres of industrial " ' r' property and 220 acres of homes.The area to the north c : — 1 is experiencing rapid industrial growth, and the areas to ,' , v • , , the south in Spokane County and east in Liberty Lake : ° e'ave are seeing more residential expansion. Barker Road Boon • accommodates almost all of this traffic. � , i 9, �' ' " ; ° ' , Washington State Department of Transportation y,�ii (WSDOT) recognizes that an improved Barker Road 1 9 interchange and bridge overpass at Barker Road and . - 0 Interstate 90 (1-90) is required by the year 2030. During r y ,fillpeak commuting times,this interchange creates vehicle back-ups for the length of the off-ramps, often backing ^� '' i up and limiting the east/west flow of 1-90. 1. , F: ayroe Key improvements i - . '. Ap ,ew +.AWA, • WSDOT will provide interim improvements �� ♦ e ' ! e •• .- by 2021 at the eastbound and westbound 1-90 �• . °i t i interchange including single-lane roundabouts and A. + ° additional approach lanes that will extend this failing • .� - B intersection's lifespan for 5-7 years. `F' , { - Sprague Ave , ■ Long-term, there is a need to convert the 1-90 w( . " roundabouts to double-lane roundabouts to meet the city and WSDOT's required level of service. Funding ■ Replace the Barker Road Bridge over 1-90 with a Total corridor cost: $90 million four-lane bridge to add needed capacity and provide Funding request: $9 million for a multiuse trail or sidewalk on both sides to allow for reconstruction from Sprague to 1-90 safe circulation of bicyclists and pedestrians. Project partners ■ Widen Barker Road to a five-lane urban section •Washington State Department of Transportation from Mission Avenue to Boone Avenue. • City of Liberty Lake • Spokane County ■ Widen Barker Road to a five-lane urban section ■ Spokane Regional Transportation Council from 1-90 to Appleway Avenue. • Greater Spokane Valley Chamber of Commerce Streamlining the approval process for federally-funded transportation projects would make this(and other projects)easier to administer,saving time and money. Federally-funded projects can cost up to 50 percent more and take 50 to 100 percent longer to deliver because of constant and extensive changes to the federal requirements. initiatives to streamline review and approval processes for transportation projects should be a top cnn'recsinnai nriority Project details _ 1 - ' _- We have had made significant cRt3:A' investments in the Barker 4 * Corridor and continue to make l Washington State improvements to accomodate growth.Area projects include: I E Garland Ln el INTERSECTION &GRADE SEPARATION - Funded Project cost: $25 million I Construction year: 2020 O RECONSTRUCTION - Funded - Euclid to Grade Separation Project cost: $2.8 million I Construction year: 2019 Imo' O RECONSTRUCTION - Funded - Spokane River to Euclid Project cost: $4.5 million I Construction year: 2021 EUCLID AVE EUCLID AVE I. 0 BRIDGE REPLACEMENT- Completed -At Spokane River j Project cost: $11.2 million I Construction year: 2010 1 Q RECONSTRUCTION - Completed - Boone to Spokane River Project cost: $2.5 million C Construction year: 2008 0 RECONSTRUCTION - Unfunded - Mission to Interstate 90 Project cost: $5 million I Construction year: pending 0 f a 1-90 INTERCHANGE RECONSTRUCTION - Unfunded - Ramps only E RiverwayAve l Project cost: $10 million I Construction year: pending ci cc E Mena Ave I CWane Ave CC Q 1-90 BRIDGE RECONSTRUCTION - Unfunded ui Project cost: $20 million I Construction year: pending m FUNDING REQUEST RECONSTRUCTION - Unfunded -Appleway to 1-90 MISSION AVE E Maxwell Ave ! Project cost: $6.5 million Construction year: pending I E Siero Ave. eRECONSTRUCTION - Unfunded -Appleway to Sprague ESharp Ave Project cost: $1 million I Construction year: pending EBoone Ave I e INTERSECTION RECONSTRUCTION -At Sprague - Interstate 90 -i E GBralda Je Interstate 90 Unfunded (partial funding secured) Project cost: $1.5 million I Construction year: 2022 BRO AY AVE EAIM,,eP P� " Cowie,A113AP 1-E CORRIDOR FUNDING STATUS (in millions) SPRAGUE AVE11 Total: $90M Funded/Complete: $46M Funded Shortfall (Unfunded): $44M $32.4M I I Unfunded 36% Request: $9M $44 M 49% City of Spokane Valley '" Complete 10210 E.Sprague Avenue Strio-. 4 na e $13.7 M Spokane Valley,WA 99206 K 15% 509-720-5000 Valley www.spokanevalley.org April 11,2019 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: April 16, 2019 Department Director Approval Check all that apply: [' consent ❑ old business [' new business [' public hearing ❑ information ® admin. report ❑ pending legislation [' executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: 2019 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendments(CPAs) GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 36.70A, SVMC 17.80.140 and 19.30.010 PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: On December 13, 2016, City Council approved Ordinance 16-018 adopting the Comprehensive Plan and associated development regulations as required every eight years. On November 20,2018, City Council approved the 2019 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Docket. BACKGROUND: The annual comprehensive plan amendment cycle runs from November 1st to October 31st of the following year. The Planning Commission considers applications during the following spring, with a decision by City Council generally occurring in late spring/early summer. The Community and Public Works Department received three privately initiated requests for Comprehensive Plan map amendments. In addition, the City proposed one Comprehensive Plan map amendment and six Comprehensive Plan text amendments. Properties approved for a Comprehensive Plan amendment(CPA)receive a zoning classification consistent with the new land use designation. On February 14, 2019,the Planning Commission was briefed on the 2019 CPAs, and a public hearing was conducted on February 28, 2019. The public hearing was closed at that time and the Planning Commission reviewed and deliberated on each of the proposed CPAs. On March 14,2019,the Planning Commission voted on the following Findings and Recommendations to the City Council: • The Planning Commission voted 5-0 to forward to City Council a recommendation to not approve CPA-2019-0001.Note: Commissioner Johnson recused himself due to a conflict of interest. • The Planning Commission had a split vote of 3-3 for CPA-2019-0003. A recommendation requires a majority vote, and therefore the Planning Commission is not able to forward a recommendation. • The Planning Commission voted 5-1 to forward to City Council a recommendation of approval of CPA-2019-0009 • The Planning Commission voted 6-0 to forward to City Council a recommendation to approve CPA-2019-0002, CPA-2019-0004 through 0008, and CPA-2019-0010. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: OPTIONS: Consensus to proceed to First Reading scheduled for May 14, 2019; or take other action as appropriate. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Consensus to proceed to First Reading. STAFF CONTACT: Mike Basinger,AICP,Economic Development Manager; Lori Barlow,AICP, Senior Planner ATTACHMENTS: PowerPoint Presentation; Yellow Binder Distributed Separately 1 of 1 2019 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendments City Council Administrative Report April 16, 2019 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Process 2 ■ 111 11.C 0 ._ c cn •O _ .v .N Administrative _ C Study Session 0 O E 2-14-19 '13 Report •v c O � N a � O 0- 5 } } E .c `-1- 'E U Public Hearing 0 Ordinance 1 st N O O 0) 2-28-19 Reading Q E o " a) 0 0 i -Q •i N U = N c ._ - N w 0 O c Findings of Fact U Ordinance 2nd Q Z .2 3-14-19 Reading f V V f Today City Initiated Text Amendments CPA-201 9-0004 — Strategies Amend Strategies Chapter 2 Strategies for l mplementation The strategies included on the previous pages are compiled here for reference. Legend For each strategy,the implementation matrix provided below also explores • bconofnicDevelopment Removed corn p I ete d the relationship between each strategy and the various elements of the • Comprehensive Plan,designates lead staff or organization for implementation LandUSe activities,outlines a time table for completion,and provides a rough sense of • Transportation Strategiesrelative priority.Though the strategies are not mandatory for the City,they are an important window Into Spokane Valley's approach to the implementation • Housing of the Comprehensive Plan and they merit continued evaluation by City staff. • Capital Facilities Updated timelines • Public&Private Utilities • Parks&Open Spaces • Natural Resources Modified strategies with new information STRATEGY ERPIMY EMENT RELATED ELEMENT(S) PARTN RS TIMING PRIORITY Undertake a comprehensive branding process to create and market an identity for Spokane Valley ; La�'len 2007 HIGH that sells the City's inherent assets to would-be Economic • • Visit Spokane Developed new s t r a t e g i e s residents,employers,and visitors Development Continue partitlpation in regional tourism-pro- • ED Dial n. motion efforts and increase the City's presence in Ecoromlc • • SpoVaAtyrest.ortsVislt 0,i,.rm HIGH regional events Development Commission Evaluate the return on investment of potent at • tourism anchors and allocate available funds Visa SpoDivikane 2018 HIGH Economic �• • �� Visit Spokane according to the-findings Development CPA-201 9-0006 — Annexation Policies 5 UP- 1111 Create annexation policies I '1Criteria for processing �" J FF- ID land use designations , L. 99 EMlssion v_ 3 Analyze fiscal impacts i_--- - �� '' CR - +vAm P _ r Spfa6�A`re I e771 Rlvd lb 111 Ave ma dAL rDAppendix - - ewap AmikimilL din Create 11 "x17" maps Easier to read and copy I / Appendix II Effe��e oa�e. a .0. Assist in public records06 1 /AI Mu dU IB nasries Y .m-. w ane o s e :40: _ _ s 11111111 ;1_,____,..)-- ...- •---, ,-,-,-i %dime Valley _ CTransportationDA-2019-0005 — Ch . 5 _JIM iiM1=11ill E e,��vA�e Update Transportation E`P"° w t•O�X - _- I ��JJJ P '.- MII o�•a .s 'j ♦ EEuddA J Feltskie. Eaa'f. dgutkeyea PI eau ryj� Element: ,E Mama mery Dr r ,! la, f - nn rrLm/ /i f Mission Ave m __-. '4. • E„.„Ave ekane n� i — Focus on pedestrian and y _ ' „....... ir -- a; e E =l i w ,- bicycle e bicycle components EP r 4....I E ESDra9 ue Ave ” • , ERM Ave ...... ,•.4...4.... 111111 111 117 •. - 111 -■�^ ..q �. T"' EB,nAe �— Ea,hAeill A,prway Tr,.. Connect pathway networkEl-e. E� i- � s Dishma , - consE � -. � Existing&Proposed Add policy language to .a - I E °'� Bikeway Network L Municipal Boundaries E29414 E32ntl Are - QSpokane'Jalley support Complete Streets � ' k e4allryU6 �,�,thAr=ai��a; � P k-Rccrcat &Opcn Space N A e �� g ,_ i Bikeway Elements •44.‘ r,,:' � ave "' =.•P p C Ped B.,._k Bridge E 44M Ave •P p Sliar'd Ue Path •••�Vew Proposed Shared Usc Path ••••V=iv Proprs 1Ped/Bike Bridge. —Removed°;1iBikc Bridge 0 0.5 7 1.5 CO Miles J IIIercr9ek n' a CPA-2(' 19-0005 — Transportation Ch . 5 8 Public Involvement: Which improvements are most critical for addressing transportation safety? 140 Online survey 1211. Public tabling H In-person survey a 3 0 a0 , to 0 a H ah.a aco ♦`~F � �Ov't ° m 3 15 .'" Sul * ' 4— D# 4.1 Cal IIII 6� . q 1 Ill mN Other tk qi° - e4 Q,�� tO ��t count v id 4Ea' Havana ■Sidewalks •Pavement Condit inns •Bikeways •street Crossings •Speeding •Bus Stops •Other CPA-2(' 19-0007 — Pedestrian /Bicycle Maps 9111 • • j. 1 Amend ma s: ov, - • , ,,.„.. ... .. ._. . . _ ii Figure 26: Pedestrian Network __ r Ma RN. I ,k t Figure 27: Bikeway Network ^-- - . , -: J„';21, p -mU i I u �, _ .� Figure 46: School Districts =-� r r u=; . CL �a ,[' W, — W -qui. 5_ r { Example: Figure 26—Pedestrian Network CPA-201 9-0010 – Twenty-year TIP .,,,,,:=, 42 imp— ii 20-Year Transportation improvement Pian =fi3^-ass Create20-year TIP Y:coc--e•! ce- •ccr•c_:teca^ccote^!Y race-'c'+st.sr e.,e:ce:Ke 6-yea-TA New appendix GraAe Sep,ranon Protects Can'truct Grum Sepe^eton et nnrJENSF Grace Pinese$NSF GSP AA�trent�3A2lQ} $ 24.004.000 7-10 years 2025-2029 ',,........ Consolidate transportation projects: P�l4NSFGra4e - W:W=t(semi anaonit►sttl6NSF all 5 25.404.000 10-20 years 20342034 lidiblidialliII0 Comprehensive Plan curs r;q_2. en :;rsoearropace�. : . �. $ 3.4":0.0:0 7-1C years 2025-2029 rrraoeau a marisrelc intersection Ado trerc:ignaietretwaceuc 5 9:0.400 7-IC years 2025-2029 intersecilon _improvement Traffic Studies 6� Barter improvement ,es trek:urn'or riii.no aoetintersecoon TBD 7.10 years 2025-2024 Barter&Apptlur3yr IrteesecJD-' aepace trunk tow or agate aril grto v!tersecuon THD 7-147 years 2023-2029 Informs 6-year TIP annually Improvement m ' P ` munidatiowt Improvement interseacin Voice mteroe bon et sea ravra.rta,t �1�M1 TBD 7.10 years 2025-2029 Triermain 8 ApplCgy Aar.=Arris movement:one aiSnei intersection TBD 7-10 years 2025-2029 intersection brnpm'+rmerlt oases unpeavement illi d PY1es Intersection intersection 1 Ur rice resection -E_, I:years 2025-2029 •rerner: PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION 11 EL im imiALisi Appendix B Fgure 27.Bikeway Network Q 16 1.16 ii gleam a. YYelet.22016 Approve 2019 proposed n. f Exise__q.=x- 'vas ky&Proposes! \ 8 Bikeway Network 1. M apalB tlenez text amendments F._....,,,,,..,,,�'"` b Bikeway Elements gi s iliWWW" ...... - �, . . • ■■ NM _ r.�I CPAs-2019-0004, 0005, 0006, 0007, 0008, and 0010 ;, �1-� L 1.---- te Wilw' aa�■■® -.. APPROVE REQUEST F,g (VOTE: 6 TO 0) i' keoe nk...man sham,on.IMIP14 a..ft.m.ouungces The C.robes WO berm and commns in in avant rrnmaxuracyce..ter... Example:Figure 27—Bikeway Network Privately Initiated Map Amendment Studyrea I CPA-2019-0001 E Emedawax•, e -f � ff r BI I J Applicant: Danny Davis SFR - Owners: Circle J Mobile Home f. (R-3 LU Park, LLC IZone) > Proposal: Change the land use W designation from I to SFR and the zoning l 0 from I to R-3 /77.., . 0 of r N,g k .; .mac CPA-2019-0001 u Area _ , .: itr�. �.�I ler rsftnY- z -. Displaying , Surroundinguses1 iginbir _ , _ MI 2r- = CPA-2019-0001 s E, . , # �l = Industrial ® - a 'tee a , Q e i r„, , = Single family � � Ifs W ■ = Commercial < •-- = Recent permitting activity L s CPA-201 9-000 1 L_ i__, 14 E :I. .,,I.', ,, L •- E Broadway Ave - �� • o `�` • Parcell oc4(6 `� Parcell 4J _1 1-11v Existing Proposed .. , P I LEGEND ❑ CPA-2019-000i Parcel 3 le at Transitional .x Regulation Buffer a `` - z Parcel 4 Affected Parcels i a - 1, Comments and Analysis 15 MIL Comments Comparison of Development Standards No substantive agency comments received ❑ • aximums Public Comment Issues noted include Building Zone Height Coverage Impacts to industrial area Incompatible uses r Unlimited N/A Limits future development R-3 35 ft. 50% Comments Included in Packet * If abutting residential, development shall comply with Transitional Regulations t R, � �� =�� 1 _ . %,-,.-� Study Area CPA-2019-0001 e i L E -- .� ''''----r- 3 1 PLANNING COMMISSION ba *1111.1111111111!' :$1 • a r RECOMMENDATION : e a �} DENY REQUEST I 1Fl F (VOTE: 5 TO 0) kilt1111111111 g , MEL € 1 i Privately Initiated Map Amendment Study Areal CPA-2019-0002 Etth A { 17iML Applicant: Whipple Consulting g NC Engineers Owners: Advent Lutheran Church, TCF Properties, LLC i Proposal: Change the land use SFR designation from SFR E9thAre — f to NC and the zoning from R-3 to NC ' I .P.1,1,i 11.4.! p CPA-2019-0002 , i tudy Ares ,.: ,._ ., , . „. v,. .,r:, itro, , ..,"'i *Ai: ,, CI- Surrounding uses g &�. i „ 1 QL. . ., _ 2 I-. I = CPA-2019-0002 1 1.-.... , ,-,.._-._... , . .--' .0 = Water District 1 _ , R 1 e e/ = Single family Ifs LU i,- ■ = School / Church " ;:i.7.k . ,, ,,-;.5„" ':-1-:/-'1. t,.' 1'''''''' '-': 4.,. .„..,„, , } .---, 'e - ._, - - ee' r----AL, 1 1 Comments and Analysis 19 MIL JIMIIL Comments Comparison of Development Stan . . rds No substantive ü Development standards are Agency comments the same — scale will be received preserved o No public comments i Maximums Density Minimum - ,acks Buildin Minimum dwelling 'ront/Flanki .• Rear Side received Zon Height Coverage Lot Size /acre Yard Yard Yard R-3 35 ft. 1 50% 5,000 6 15 ft.f 20ft. 10 ft. 5 ft. s•ft NC\ 35ft. N/A * * 15ft. 10 ft.^ 10 ft.^i cipm Y ! ,, � 1Cii. PA-2 19- 2 �-�� _ tallij 1: Study Ar�� „,.. 4,i,r _ _ i,4 ,: „.. ._ :: ,ti, ,, .::- . ' _ _ ,,_t ,__, ,:it, r4i: 1 P - mil ” PLANNING COMMISSION11 - 41 __rir 4:-" 1 . '‘i IIIK II r 7:; 4 orli ` . Iu I . " ik 4 RECOMMENDATION : n ilt4P�Pt}:I j j , ' 1_2' -: -' '': ,IH APPROVE REQUEST �Hllf`-,-' IPLIM0A' 4;ri. ,,',' uil-_ } P (VOTE: 6 TO 0 - fl'I'--. - ..i _ "2: I r,-- _ __ _ . _ � r Privately Initiated Map Amendment Tiimi I PA-2 19- C 0 0003 RC Applicant: Joel Elgee Study Areas Owners: Marguerite, LLC — Terry Ovstedal SFR/R-3 45181A213 2817E Proposal: Change the land use S'MI4, designation from SFR to MFR and the zoning from R-3 to MFR - L :„.7 ___ ,_ 1 ,,..„ . _ 9 ! , , , .. , __ , , ,..... I :7:-....., .., „_ , t_____ 1, ,, PA-2 19- .� -0 0003 � g; zF ,�L fs ...F.---, - , 1 CL 41 ialStudy Area i., Surrounding uses < S. ' t 2 Ci. = CPA-2019-0003 ii i,`.. = Single family and two family _ z' sim — aJ s , gi . �/ ■ = Commercial i Ii -IH . _ .• _ . 1 W , „_ ■ < -....._ .: Q ■ I - 1 _ g. i Comments and Analysis 23 MIL Comments Comparison of Development Standards ❑ No substantive Agency r Height and Lot size comments received Differences noted Public Hearing Comments aximums l ensity o Increased traffic/street parking Building Minimum L. •welling Zone Coverage o Inconsistent with Single Family Height Size /acre neighborhood character (height and R-3 35 ft. 50% 5,000 soft 6 density) \\, No sidewalks in area — increased MFR 50 ft. 60% 2,000 wit 22 traffic affects pedestrian safety ilt: .! 1 CPA2019000311_f41 ..1,'t. 1:'''.'t-. u - t1 :y.._.ar__ 1ir_ ■ PLANNING COMMISSION . o, uA«a ;a. RECOMMENDATION : '� � itII s o r NO RECOMMENDATION e ®. • (VorE: 3ro3 ) ) ,11 � `` NTS r City Initiated Map Amendment N //// \\ ,. , , ,_. 7 ------ iwi-' 1- CPA-20 19-0009 25M111i �,. .. - - i _{ �� I II 111Applicant: City of Spokane Valley i Project Site . 1 -I ___ - UMW i Owners: Carlson, Janson, Kjos, loom - Massong, On the Rock We 1 1 tam ---------66-- ..............„ LU Stand, LLC, Consolidated ' -----: Irr. Dist., Henderson ; 1i �- .IIIIII i r117 i . et Legacy, LLC and Whimsical 1 rue- W Pig LTD Part. I ■�� , g .11.W 0 Proposal: 1., I I I I �, F "Sh.)11..)11. p Change the land use _ +II �a mum i� .-: :',-;h_ designation and zoning • intim ®u ri J from MFR to CMU � I �•=.I��r- ! - I , 1. , I � 11111111111111111111111 LL_ In I MI 1dt 1 1 1 CPA-2019-0009 _ ,,. ., ,._ , ,6iiiii.,_ , , ..___. „.,,, __ ____. ___.,,m.,,,,,mille _ _.E,I..,0%_t_._._,,..,. _. _. __ _ t Study Area rA,��f; 5 i 411:11C r • - *Ne'i ,--,-.„- — - . .xR `J, v At 4 a t 2 „,... . . „ _. , ,, .:__;,_.... :_,. .:,_,,:: : —:_-_-,..„-,--, -7 .. :,-itet,„ z 1`�' *1 ,: `fir r r, a biz _' -� i • ..� a�• 1 + - _- __---- )11-, n Qj T i - /�/ r. p .VW gni „..... �ehri tLJ ' ■ . 1.. * _... ...:, ,, i. „..,_. ; ., t, _ __-_,:_:, w ___T.;,-, i. ri4:,-.1....1 ..101is i+ -. - ' m .s.,. �,. a.r f 4 [`'� :1. ° S. p rm ,,_. y F • .e_ >[�,r i Trey c _0E2.,,,,i l'i CPA-2019-0009 .1771 I. ,....,,A\, it n�� _ _ _ _ ________ 1 COMPREHENSIVE CML ,*Study Area PLAN MAP LAND i ri 45104.9151 Y USE13107 E MISSION AV DESIGNATIONS 45104.0328 R51134.0323 323 :ADPRE55 < U VACANT . 'WWII LAND AND - 45104.0329 • I RESS OWN ZONING MAP ,,..:.. ,, ,... 15104.6316 • 4-5104_0311 "- 45104,0330 13516E 13519E 13021 E ZONING 7 YISSION AVE MISSION AVE MISSION AVE DISTRICTS MFR SFR 11 Comments and Analysis 28MIL - Comments Comparison of Development Standards No substantive Agency r Height and Density received Differences noted comments e s o Public Hearing Comments aximums Density Building Minimum Lot welling Unspecified concerns Zone Height Coverage Size /acre about change MF ' 50 ft. 60% 2000 soft 22 CMU N/A N/A N/A No limit's A 20 19000 9 _ E'I'" 4li'}tii4udy !"1 . r., ' [.1-.F.,“:----- i9p [l {a} .:. _ _ - +— ._. l Nl}Fcl ilk C,� ` PLANNING COMMISSION � � ,.. . _ A , RECOMMENDATION: , .. .a F APPROVE REQUEST .. .� .�` - , w: ?r (VOTE: 5 TO 1 ) ,:viiik_ f .v.,-,,..., :- ' 7r•,,,0,,,_,,,..5._44_,0. ,.,: „, - ,, M® , -:i ,,, .Pir . _,I Illt- =, ! . ' ',-..' • ,rte !, E JP t 7 �a�' �' +eY�l' fSglQy. If E 30 QUESTIONS 2019 Annual Comp Plan Amendments Contents of Yellow Binder City of Spokane Valley 2019 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Index COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS File Number Map yr Text Summary of Amendment Index Tab No. Minutes from February 1428 and Index Tab 1 March 14, 2019_ Presentations from February 14 and 28, 2019 CPA-2019-0001 Land Use Map Change parcel 45183.9059 from I to Index Tab 2 SFR (Danny Davis) CPA-2019-0002 Land Use Map Change parcel 45234.4501 and Index Tab 3 45234,0210 from SFR to NC (Advent Lutheran Church and TCF Properties LLC CPA-2019-0003 Land Use Map Change parcel 45181.0213 from SFR index Tab 4 to MFR (Elge) CPA-2019-0009 Land Use Map Change designation for parcels Index Tab 5 45104.9151, 45104.0150, etas, from MF to CIMIU. CPA-20190004 Text - Chapter 2 Update implementation strategies to Index Tab 6 remove completed strategies, update timelines, and add new strategies consistent with the goals and policies in the Comprehensive Plan. CPA-2019-0005 Text - Chapter 5 Update pedestrian and bicycle Index Tab 6 components of the Transportation Element and related goals and policies. Bring language forward to support the consideration of a Complete Streets ordinance. CPA-2019-0006 Text - Chapter 2 Annexation tcal and *olicy additions Index Tab 6 CPA-2019-0007 Figure 26, 27, and 46 Update Figures 26, 27 and 46 to Index Tab 6 reflect changes and amendments to pedestrian and bicycle facility recommendations. CPA-2019-0005 Text- New Appendix Create a new appendix of the most Index Tab 6 _ recently adopted maps, CPA-2019-0010 Text - New Appendix Create a new appendix of i Index Tab 6 transportation projects for a 20-year period that is informed by existing studies and plans. . CPA-2019-0001 Findings of Fact Index Tab 7 through 2019- CPA-2019-0001 through 2019-0010 0010 TAB1 Regular!Meeting Minutes Spokane Valley Planning Commission Council Chambers—City Hall February 14,2019' L Chair Johnson called the meeting to order at 5:59 p.m. LI. Commissioners, staff and audience stood for the pledge of allegiance. I. Office Assistant Robin Hutchins took roll and the following members and stafF were present: James Johnson. Erik Lamb, Deputy City Attorney Danielle Kaschmitter Lori Barlow, Senior Planner.. Timothy Kelley at-dyed late®t 5;01 pale Karen YKerndall Planner Robert McKinley MarlinPalaniuk, Planner Michael Phillips, absent - excused Cohn Quinn Hurts, Planner Michelle Rasmussen, absent-excused Robin Hutchins, Office Assistant 1llatt Walton Deanna Horton, Secretary to the Commission ITearing no objections, Commissioners Rasmussen and Phillips were excused from the meeting. IV. AGENDA: Commissioner Walton moved to approve the February 14, 2019 agenda as presented. There was no discussion. The vote on the'motion was five in favor, zero against, and the MO passed V. MINUTES: Commissioner Walton moved to approve the meeting minutes from January 24, 2019 as presented. There was no discussion. The vote on this notion was f five in_favor, zero against and the motion.passed, VI, COMMISSION REPORTS: Commissioner Johnson thanked Secretary Horton for going above and beyond in providing him the materials he needed in preparation for the meeting dee to his absence. Ccnunissioner Johnson advised he attended the City Council meeting February 5, 2019 regarding the Planned Action Ordinance for the Centennial Business Park that the Commission forwarded. The Council unanimously moved the item forward for a second reading and Chair Johnson congratulated the Commission on their work. He added that he attended a lecture put on by YWCA at Gonzaga and the speaker was Jackson Cats, P1 D "What does it mean to be a strong Man". The lecture was regarding gender equality and was eye opening. VII. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT: Senior Planner Lori Barlow had nothing to report, but commented that she would update the advanced agenda_prior to the next meeting„ VIII. P TJBLIC COMMENT: On any subject which is not on the agenda. Barb Howard, City of Spokane Valley: Ms. Howard advised that her public comment from the January 24, 2019 meeting was not accurately reflected in the minutes. She stated her comment regarding Bast Rich was mistaken to be East Ridge. IX. COMMISSION BUSINESS: 02-14-21119 Planning Commission Mirages Page 2 of 10 t. Deliberations: CTA 2018-005, a privately initiated amendment to Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVi 1C) 19.40.050, 19.40.060 and 19.060.050, proposing changes to duplex and towniwine development standards. Senior Planner Lori Barlow summarized that the amendment would modify the Permitted Use Matrix in SVMC 19.60.050. This amendment would change the Matrix to add supplemental regulations to the requirements for duplexes and would eliminate townhomes in the R-3 zone. This would also add supplemental regulations restricting duplexes to one duplex per acre, they would be required to be on separate lots with separate parcel numbers. This amendment would also add regulations dictating duplex location and proximity to each other. Lastly, this would modify Cottage Development standards by requiring that the development have mere than one owner, Ms. Barlow explained that the Commissioners asked if the City had employment projections or infonnatiou relative to rental verses owner occupied housing at the previous meeting. Ms. Barlow noted that she was unable to identify employment projections for the City, but she was able to collect data from the 2018 census regarding ownet occupied housing units. Ms. Barlow provided a map depicting housing units at the Census tract level identifying the percentage of homes that are owner occupied within each tract. Ms. Barlow explained the Census counts each dwelling unit as well as each single family home highlighting that anything considered to be a"dwelling unit" was captured. For example, each unit within a multi-family complex is a mit that would be counted. Ms. Barlow concluded that the closer the areas are to corridors or the freeway the higher the rental rates, moving further south and east of the City the owner occupied rate increases in these lower density zones. Commissioner Kelly requested clarification asking if the pereentages listed are owner occupied or rentals. Ms. Barlow explained the percentages reflect owner occupied homes. Commissioner Kelly asked how the map depicts rentals. Ms. Barlow explained that the census identified these percentages by counting everything(single family, duplexes, apartments, manufactured homes, etc.) that constitutes a dwelling unit. Continuing that some of the tracts have very dense single family residential neighborhoods, but also have a high number of apartment complexes. When these land uses are combined in the tract, the results are skewed by the high number of apartments within the complexes. The rentals are concentrated hi one area; while if you look closer in the neighborhood the single family areas have a very high percentage of owner occupied homes. Commissioner Johnson stated he was surprised to see 84 %rental oo upled units east of Pines Road and south of the freeway. Ms. Barlow advised that the area in question has 900 housing units and 148 of them are owner occupied. Commissioner Walton asked if the City has any current applications for new duplexes or tows homes pending. Ms. Barlow stated she does not have information on current construction permits. Information on the number of platted lots or plats under review could be compiled, but it's problematic due to the length of time that it may take a developer to record a plat following preliminary review. She continued to explain the three step process for approving a plat She concluded that it is difficult to know how many lots may be developed with duplexes versus how many lots are large enough to allow a duplex. Commissioner Johnson asked about a letter received in the packet from Leonard and Nancy Percell, stating there was no date stamp on the letter and asked when it was received. Ms. Barlow explained the letter was forwarded to the City via an email from Ms. Pete Miller who was aware that it was not provided to us ia time for the public 02-14-2019 Pluttniitig Commission Minutes Page 3 olio heating, After discussion with the legal department it was determined it could be provided for consideration as the public hearing was still open. Commissioner Johnson asked for clarification on the number of duplexes that would be reduced. Ms. Barlow explained that table three of the staff report captures how many duplexes would be allowed under the current regulations verses how many duplexes would be allowed if this code text amendment were to be passed. Ms. Barlow explained that should you have a lot size of 10,000 to 15,000 square feet you would be allowed one duplex under the current regulations. She continued that the code text amendment as proposed insinuates you would have to have at least one acre of land and would not allow any duplex development on 10,000 to 15,000 square feet. Commissioner Johnson clarified that the 161 vacant lots that were 15,000 to 39,930 square feet would allow one to three duplexes or two to six dwelling units under the current code. Commissioner Johnson stated that under the proposed amendment up to one duplex could be developed, and that was agreed upon by Ms. Barlow. Commissioner Johnson stated that the amendment could potentially impact up to 600 dwelling units. Ms. Barlow concluded that this amendment does not affect our land capacity analysis to due underlying minimum lot size being the same for a single family dwelling as it is a duplex. Coln issiones Johnson asked about developmental rights. Deputy City Attorney Eric Lamb explained that the City regulates land use and restrict rights through zoning. Mr. Lamb added that the duplex portion of this proposed regulation limits the number of duplexes, but does not necessarily limit the number of dwelling units in total. The applicant would not be prohibited from constructing and using the land for residential purposes with the same number of dwelling units. Mr. Lamb added it may be cheaper to build duplex dwelling units, and the developer may see a different return on investment but no total loss of units allowed would occur and thus no substantial injury incurred, Mr. Lamb added that from a taking standpoint staff isn't overly concerned, but it is something to consider. Ms. Barlow concluded that if the Planning Commission recommendation is for approval, staff requests the Planning Commissioners provide specific direction as to how to rewrite the proposal making it implementable to alleviate staf Ps concerns. Commissioner Johnson asked about a concern heard during public Gommerit regarding the feasibility of cottages as a viable development. Ms. Barlow explained that if this were to be implemented as written, cottage development may not be allowed. Commissioner Walton stated his concern was intent verses interpretation regarding owners selling after development and if they would be in violation. Mr. Lamb added the City does net regulate who purchases a property, since that is a private transaction between two parties. Mr. Lamb added that if the application indicated multiple owners the City would have no recourse. Commissioner Walton asked if the City has determined an interpretation on converting a single family to a duplex and hoW that would be regulated or impacted and the answer was no. There was discussion regarding a dwelling that could be developed as duplex and the permit review process to determine if it can be done. Ms. Barlow added that for the record the addition of accessory dwelling uruts(ADIJ) is different than converting a home to a duplex. This happens frequently and the ADU does not require a 5,000 square feet lot per dwelling unit, Hearing nofurther questions Chair Johnson closed the public hearing at 6:40 PM During deliberation Commissioner Kelley stated the testimony from public comment was excellent and understands their passion;however, he cannot see how to implement this as presented. Commissioner IoKinley added he agreed with Commissioner Kelley anal had 02-14-2019 Planning Commission Minutes Page 4 an) nothing further. Commissioner Z<.aschrnitter stated that she understands the desire to protect the neighborhood character and the traffic concerns, but did riot feel the proposal to be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. She added she is concerned with the availability of affordable housing and is not in favor. Commissioner Walton expressed his worry in trying to find a solution to the problem. He noted he has seen the uptick in apartments and duplexes. Commissioner Walton stated he understands the community character is changing and gave the elimination of the open space requirement in the Mixed Use zones as an example He finds it concerning to see a more urbanized Valley. He continued with his concerns regarding the language end how difficult it would be to achieve while keeping in line with the Comprehensive Plan and concluded that he could not support this proposal as presented. Commissioner Johnson stated he utelemtands the feelings surrounding the quality of life as he grew up here and gave examples of his childhood. Commissioner Johnson asked what the Valley would look like if it had been decided back then that they didn't want growth. He added that change happens. He applauded the applicants for their work on the amendment and effort to impact change in a positive manner. He went to state, that as a government entity we have to consider the common good and the common good does not necessarily mean what is best for a few. He went onto explain that he agrees that owner occupied is much more desirable environment and encourages more investment into the community. Commissioner Johnson felt if there was a moratorium on development of duplexes there could be litigation. He concluded that he could not support this proposal. Commissioner Kelley moved to recommend denial of CTA 2018-0005. Commissioner Walton stated there is still opportunity for residents to engage moving forward and encouraged citizens that have concerns to come forward to the City Council or member of the Commission to voice their opinions. The urate ofi the motion was fiva irnfavor and zero opposed and the motion passed ii. Study Session: Proposed 2019 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Ms, Barlow gave some background and introduced the 2019 A.s rural Comprehensive Plan Amendment process. Ms. Barlow explained that the deadline for applications was October 31, 2018 at which time the City had received three privately initiated and seven City initiated Comprehensive Plan amendments. The City Council approved the docket on November 20, 2(11 g and the City began notification requirements and review. Ms. Barlow advised the Commission will conduct the study session and that the public hearing is scheduled February 28, 2019 with deliberations to be held on March 14, 2019. Ms. Barlow highlighted procedural r'ecommendatious and urged the Commission to consider the information provided and public comments. She noted that public comment had not been closed and the Commission would receive additional comments up to the public hewing. Commissioner Johnson confirmed that these proposals will be addressed individually but will be forwarded to the Council as a group. Ms. ]Barlow explained that yes, during the public hearing stage each proposal would be discussed individually to allow for ease of public comment. Each item will be addressed individually by the Commission and can be modified, approved or denied. Finally,the recommendations will be forwarded to the council as a complete package. Mr. Lamb added that the law requires these items to be considered collectively to ensure that the impacts are considered cumulatively. 02-I4-2012 Maud rig CornmissIon Minutes Page 5 of 10 a. CPA-2019-0004: A City Initiated Amendment to update implementation strategies to remove completed strategies, update timelines, and add new strategies consistent with the goals and policies in the Comprehensive Plan. Ms. Barlow introduced Conprehensivc Plan Amendment CPA-2019-0004. Ms. Barlow explained that this will modify some strategies in Chapter 2 to refresh some language and bring it into sync with the City's objectives_ This will remove strategies that have been completed, update timelines and modify with new information. Ms: Barlow gave an example of strategies to remove such as pursuing funding for the Barker Grade separation since the money has been procured and the City is moving forward. 'b. CPA-2019-0006: A City Initiated Amendment to Annriexcrtian and policy additions. Ms. Barlow introduced Comprehensive Plan Amendment CPA-209-0006, Ms. Barlow explained that this amendment would be to modify the existing annexation policies and add one additional policy. The proposed amendment would require the City to develop criteria for processing annexation requests and would develop framework for regulations in the future. This amendment would also identify land use designations in our unincorporated urban growth area. Lastly, a policy would be modified to include that the City looks at fiscal impacts to utilities when considering aniiexation, c. CPA-2019-0008 A City Initiated Amendment to create a new map appendix of the most recently adopted maps. Ms. Barlow introduced Comprehensive Plan Amendment CPA-2019-0008, Ms. Barlow explained that this introduces a new map appendix to the Comprehensive Plan. The maps are not new to the City but the appendix is new to the Comprehensive Plan. The appendix will capture the maps and attached them to the Comprehensive Plan making them more accessible to the public at a manageable size. d. CPA-2019-0005 A City Initiated Amendment to update pedestrian and bicycle component. of the Transportation Element and related goals and policies. Transportation Planner Colin Quinn-Hurst introduced Comprehensive Plan Amendment CPA-2019-0004. Mr. Quinn-Hurst explained that this amendment updates the pedestrian and bicycle components in completing the pathway and trail network. This will add language to support consideration of Complete Streets. Mr. Quinn--Hurst explained that the bicycle and pedestrian plan was first established in 2011 and the updates will revise the components to reflect changes in the network based ori current conditions and practicalities. The 2011 recommendations included a network of 156 miles of sidewalk, 38 miles of bike lanes and 28 miles of new pathways. Mr. Quinn-Hurts explained that with 156 miles at $600.00 per foot for a new side walk the cost is a substantial amount of money adding up to halfa billion and decades of time. Mr, Quinn-Hurst stated the City conducted a public involvement process that included attending community events and an online survey, Through the survey it was determined that the top priority for improvements was a completed sidewalk system the second priority was good pavement, and third priority was pathway and bikeway improvements followed by crosswalks, The City administered a technical evaluation looking at crashes and safety, congestion and travel patterns,to find "hot spots"where improvements would have the largest impact and fit in line with public tat-l4-20I9 planning Commission Miniktcs Page 6 of HI comment. In conclusion adding text to Chapter 5 would outline these priorities, add language to support the goal of connecting the pathway network by linking the Appleway Trail to the Centennial Trail. Lastly this amendment would add language supporting eventual consideration of a Complete Streets ordinance to leverage existing funding. e. CPA.-2,019.0007 A City Initiated Amendment to update Figures 26, 27 and 46 to reflect changes and amendments to pedestrian and bicycle facility recommendations. Mr. Quinn-Hurst introduced Comprehensive Plan Amendment CPA-2019-0007. Mr. Quinn -Hurst advised this proposal is to update the Sidewalk, Bicycle and School District Maps to reflect completed projects and updated networks. f. CrA-2019-000h) A City Initiated Amendment create a new appendix of transportation projects for a 20-year period that is Informed by existing studies. Mr. Quinn -Hurst introduced Comprehensive Plan Amendment CPA-2019-0010.. Mr. Quinn -Hurst advised this amendment will create an appendix showing a list of 20- year transportation projects. This will be regularly updated as a resource for vetting and developing our transportation projects to make themeligible for grant opportunities Commissioner Kelley asked about the implementation of a sidewalk in R-3 residential zones on private property and how the setbacks are addressed with the homeowner. Mr. Quinn -Hurts advised that is one of the largest challenges of constructing sidewalk as property owners often have landscaping in the City right-of- way. It was discussed that the City has the authority to construct the improvement within public right-of-way and that the City pays for all sidewalk improvements when rt is a City initiated project The resident has no cost to them. g. CPA.-2019-00001:A Privately Initialed Amendment to change the Comprehensive Plan Laird Use Designation from Industrial a) to Single Family Residential (SFR) and to change the Zoning District from Industrial (X) to Single Family Residential Urban (R-3). Planner Iaren Kendall introduced CPA-2019-0001 a privately initiated Comprehensive Plan amendment, located 300 feet south of the intersection of Park Road and Broadway Avenue. This site-specific Comprehensive Plan Map and Zoning Map amendment is requesting to change the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation from lndtxsii.a1 (i) to Single Family Residential (SFR) and to change the Zoning District from Industrial (I) to Single Family. Ms. Kendall went on to explain the potential incompatibility of rezoning the site to R- 3 from Induial as it would reduce the allowable uses from a broad range of industrial uses to single family, duplex, cottages, townlionnes, daycares, school and church uses. The R-3 zone would allow six dwelling units per acre and up to 12 units per acre with cottage development. Changing the land use designation and zoning of the subject parcel will impact adjacent industrial properties as future development will be subject to transitional regulations, limiting ability for full site development. The transitional standards include greater setbacks, screening requirements and various other restrictions. Ms. Kendall explained that if approved, the transitional tegtmlatians would apply to any new development on the four parcels adjacent to the subject parcel located 0Z-14-7019 Planning Commission Minutes Inge 7 of 10 to the west and south. Ms. Kendall went on to explain that two of the surrounding parcels have recent activity. One parcel has an active building permit and the other has gone through a pre-applitatiotr meeting - both for industrial development, Commissioner Kelley asked questions regarding adding borders to residential and industrial properties and how this would affect the size of each parcel, Ms. Kendall explained that yes that would be the case, iiE this were to be changed to R-3 z€rrxing it would impact the future development of the four adjacent parcels as the land surrounding the properties would become larger reducing the size of the existing. She referred to the graphic highlighting the areas affected by the transitional regulation. Commissioner Johnson asked for confirmation that one of the current parcels lms development occmTing. Ms. Kendall explained, one property has an active building permit and the other has completed a preliminary application meeting inquiring what they can develop on the property. The site does not have an active permit, however they are contemplating development. Ms. Kendall concluded the proposed amendment is not consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan, Commissioner Walton confirmed that if this were to pass this change would isolate two parcels from the industrial 7011e bordering north Park Road. Commissioner Walton asked how this change would impact existing use of surrounding property's? Ms. Kendall advised the property would remain the same. If the amendment were to be approved and if the property owners choose to redeveloped the property to a nonresidential use in the future, they would have to comply with the transitional regulations. h. CPA-2019-0002: A Privately Initiated Amendment to change the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation from Single Family Residential (SFR) to Neighborhood Commercial (INC) and to change the Zoning District from Single Family Residential Urban -3) to Neighborhood Commercial(NC) Planner Marty Palaniuk presented CPA-2019-0002, explaining this is a privately initiated amendment to change the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation from Single Family Residential(SFR)to Neighborhood Commercial (NC) and to change the Zoning District from Single Family Residential Urban (R-3) to Neighborhood Commercial (NC). Mr. Palaniuk stated that the property is located at $4+'Avenue and Sullivan Road. $'l' Avenue is a minor arterial, and Sullivan Road is a principal arterial with approximately 20,000 vehicle trips per day. This is directly across the street from Central Valley High School which creates significant traffic. North of the high school there has been substantial multifamily developments creating significant density. Mr. Palaniuk stated that this site consists of two properties, one owned by the Genesis Church and one residence. There is an irrigation district located to the west of the property and a Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) easement The easement encumbers both of the properties along the east boundary and does create some issues. Mr. Palaniuk explained the Comprehensive Plan land use designation for these properties is to have single family residential units. If approved this would change the land use designation to Neighborhood Commercial intended to provide neighborhood scaled commercial developments to serve the neighborhoods. Mr. Palaniuk explained the current zoning of R-3 limits the uses, changing the zoning would allow several additional uses to include retail, office and convenience stores. I-le added the 02.14,2019 Harming Commission taintes Pagc E of t0 development restrictions to the Neighborhood Commercial zone would keep the scale of the development to fit into the neighborhood. For example, height requirements would be the same and setbacks would be designed to be consistent with the adjacent residential lots. Mr. Palaniuk concluded that this proposal is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan, i. CPA-2019-0403 A Privately Initiated Amendment Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation from Single Family Residential (SFR) to Multi Family Residential (MFR) and to change the Zoning District from Single Family Residential Urban (R-3) to Multi Family Residential (MFR) Mr, Palaniuk presented CPA-2019-0403, a privately initiated amendment to change the Comprehensive Plan.Land Use Designation from Single Family Residential (SFR) to Multifamily Residential (MFR) and to change the Zoning District from Single Family Residential Urban (R-3) to Multifamily Residential (MFR). Mr. Palaniuk stated the property is located near the Mullen Road and Argonne Road cotiidor which are both.principal arterials that are heavily traveled, Mn- Palaniuk added that this corridor is mostly commercial uses with a large retail center located northeast of the site, Mi. Palaniuk continued that this site is satiated on the northwest corner of Sinto Avenue and Marguerite Road within an older neighborhood. The site is a single parcel with two duplexes and a single family home constructed on site. Current regulations would not permit the numerous dwellings on one lot. Mr. Palaniuk continued explaining the current uses adjacent to the site arc commercial. The intent of this amendment it to change the current land use designation of Single Family Residential to Multifamily Residential. The change would allow multifamily development and low impact commercial development, and would change the zoning regulations significantly, the density would allow additional units. Mr. Palaniuk continued adding that the most significant change would be increasing the height requirements from 35 teet to 55 feet, and the setback requirements. Mr, Palaniuk concluded this is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan_ Commissioner Walton asked how would this be in keeping with the Comprehensive Plan as it is essentially creating a Multifamily Residential "island". Mr. Palaniuk explained that normally if this were a site specif o rezone it world not meet the criteria. Due to this being air_arnendment this is considered to be an area wide rezone, looking at the plan it seeks to situate multifamily near transportation corridors and retail centers, Ma, Barlow added that the review of the Comprehensive Plan is just as Mr_ Palaniuk stated however, if this were a site specific rezone this would meet the criteria as the commercial zone located across the street is a higher intensity zone; multifamily is a less intensive zone and would meet the criteria, Commissioner Johnson asked if the development directly north was a duplex development. Mr. Petunia advised that there arc five duplexes on the lot. It was believed the applicant approached the owners asking if they had interest in the amendment, and they declined at this time. j. CPA-2019-OOO9; A City Initiated Amendment Proposal to change Comprehensive Plan land use designation and zoning district from Multifamily Residential (M1 R) to Corridor Mixed Use(CMU). Planner Karen Kendall introduced CPA-2019--0009 a City initiated Comprehensive Plan to change the land use designation and zoning district from Multifamily Residential to Corridor Mixed Use. Ms. IKendall explained the property involved is 18.7 acres and includes 12 parcels of land north of Mission Avenue between McDonald Road on the west and Maurer Road to the east. Ms. Kendall explained that there is a 154-foot-wide Bonneville Power Administration (13PA) easement 02-M-2019 Planning Comm ission Mint es Page 9 aft* crossing the properties and noted that the properties were largely developed as the Whimsical Pig with other various owners and uses. Ms, Kendall went on to explain the surrounding uses of the site include single family residence, multifamily, professional offices, assisted living and retail. The intent of the Comprehensive Plan land use designation is to provide land that will allow light manufacturing, retail, multifamily and offices along transpiration corridors -the uses in the area currently fit the intent. Ms. Kendall explained that should this change occur;the amendment area would be allowed to further develop consistently with the adjacent land uses. Ms. Kendall continued that the zone change would allow uses that align with the intent of the Comprehensive Plan along the major transportation corridor being Mission Avenue. Ms. Kendall concluded that there is limited development opportunity for these properties. This proposal would allow development along the corridor consistent with the corridor and would not be create any nonconforming use with the change. The Corridor Mixed Use designation has no height limitations; in comparison the current Multifamily Residential zone is limed to 50 feet in height. However, there are not many buildings that currently push or exceed the 50-foot height limit. Ms. Kendall added the Corridor Mixed use has 110 density limits and the change may allow an increase in the density. Ms. Kendall concluded that the amendment would make the location consistent with the surrounding area and is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Commissioner Johnson asked if parking can be located within the easement, Ms. Kendall advised that yes there can be parking however, no buildings can be constructed iii the easement. Conuniissioner Johnson asked if the lots to the far east were single family homes, Ms. Kendall advised they are single family residences and there would be no transitional standards as transitional standards only apply between zones. Ms. Barlow addressed the Commission regarding procedural process and the irext step will be the public hearing scheduled for February 28, 2019, Commissioner Johnson asked about public hearing notification. Ms. Barlow advised the notification went out and the City increased the notification requirement area from the 400 feet to 8Oi1 feet around the site specific requests. X. GOOD OF THE ORDER:Commissioner Walton was appreciative to the community for their civic duty and applauded them fat taking action. He stated it was with regret that he had to vote as he did. He stated the purpose of the Commission is to maintain the Comprehensive Plan in looking out for the citizens and the future in keeping the Valley vibrant. Commissioner Kaschmitter thanked the staff and the public for their comments. Commissioner Johnson thanked the public for their comments and understands the difficulties in loss for the quality of life, He explained the Corntnissicn is here for the common good and that is the only way it works. If itis narrowed to serve the few, that is when it fails, He thanked the Commission for their hard work. Commissioner Kelley commented en. the Planned Action Ordinanc amendment the Commission passed. He noted that an article in the paper noted the council. was looking at approving the amendment; but that there wasn't-going to be a requireriient for any environmental study. Mr. Lamb advised that the article misstated the details. It was determined that there may be an environmental review, but, the City will have already undertaken the environmental review. The Council is considering allowing developers to rely on the environmental review that has already been done. Commissioner Kelly asked for clarification that should someone propose a project to the industrial zone that may need additional study they will have to conduct further testing, Mr. Lamb advised that yes, that would be the case. 02.-I4-2o1g Plnriniiig Conuriissioa7 ifvilnutes Page Lo orio . ADJOURNMENT: Commissioner Walton moved to adjourn at 8:05 p.m. The vote on the motion was unanimous s in favor, zero against, and the maUUon passed. .„ JE1111S Johnson, Chair Date signed 9 1,4-,71-41;LIKJ Robin Hutchins, Secretary Regular Meeting Minutes Spokane Valley Planning Commission Council Chambers —City Hall February 28, 2019 I. Chair Johnson called the meeting to order at 6:03 p.m. IL Commissioners, staff and audience stood for the pledge of allegiance, IH. Office Assistant Robin Hutchins took roll and the following members and staff were present: James Johnson Eric Lamb, Deputy City Attorney Danielle Kaschinitter Lori Barlow,-Senior Planner Timothy Kelley Karen Kendall, Planner Robert McKinley Martin Palatiiuk, Planner Michael Phillips, absent - excused Colin Quinn-Hurst, Planner Michelle Rasmussen Jenny Nickerson, Building Official Matt Walton Ray Wright, Senior Tra.ff�ir Engineer Mike Basinger, Economic Development Manager Robin Hutchins, Office Assistant Deanna Norton, Secretary to the Commission Hearing no objections, Commissioner Phillips was excused from the meeting. IV. AGENDA: Commissioner Walton moved to approve the February 28, 2019 agenda as presented. There was no discussion. Tiw vote an /1w motion was six in,fa or•, zero against, and the motion passed V. MINUTES: Commissioner Walton moved to approve the meeting minutes from February 14, 2019 as presented. Commissioner Johnson asked to connect his comment made regarding mduving up to 600 dwelling units. His intent was to state it could impact 600 dwelling units as that was a critical point. The vote oro the amended motion was six in favor, zero against and the ,notion passed VI. COMMISSION REPORTS: Commissioner 'Johnson went to the City council meeting and advised Councilmember Haley commented on the important topics the Commission has addressed VII, ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT: Senior Planner Lori Barlow advised the City has received a privately initiated Code Text Amendment and will bring forward a City Initiated Code Text Amendment_ VIII. PUBLIC COMMENT:NT: On any subject which is not on the agenda. There was no public comment. IX. COMMISSION III ISINESS: I. Findings of Facts: CTA-2018-0005, a privately initiated amendment of Spokane Valley Municipal Code 19.40.050, 19.40.060 and 19.60.050, proposing changes to the duplex and townhamne development standards. 02.28-20I 9 Planning Cuinmassion Minutes PEkge 2 of IS Senior Planner Lori Barlow summarized that CIA-2018-0005 has come before the Commission on several occasions, First being the study sessions, a continued public hearing and the process ending in deliberations where the Commission voted unanimously to deny the request. Ms. Barlow explained that the findings and recommendation will be forwarded to the Council for review and their process will also include public comment for those following the item.. Cam, riS iOrle1' Walton moved to for tiPar'd the Findings of tact recommendation as presented to the City Council. Commissioner Walton stated he recognized the interest and would like to see how the Council continues to look at the item. Commissioner Walton strongly recommended the Commission uphold their Findings of Fact, Commissioner Johnson clarified that his correction to the minutes was extremely important for a number of reasons. idc added that if the Commission would have approved this request it would have impacted thousands of opportunities for dwelling units to be constructed and was toe far reaching. The vote err the motion vp'as six in favor and zero oppos c1 and the motion passed. ii. Public Hearing: Proposed 2019 Comprehensive flair Amendments. Chair Johnson read the rules of the public hearing and opened the public hearing at 6..24 p.n�. Ms. Barlow reviewed the process and advised that determinations of non-significance had been issued for all amendments being considered. Should the Commission make it through to deliberations the Findings of Facts will be considered on March 14,2019 and then the recommendations will be forwarded to the Council. Ms. Barlow emphasized the notice requirements for the amendments, On January M),201g the general notice was published in the newspaper, a notice was posted on site for those that arc site specific and notices were mailed to property owners within 800 feet as opposed to code requirements off only 400 feet. Ms. Barlow added that three additional comments have been received for consideration and will be discussed during the applicable amendment presentation. Ms. Barlow highlighted procedural recommeridntions advising that tonight's meeting is for the Commission to review the materials and to consider public comment, Ms, Barlow explained that staff will be discussing the City initiated Comprehensive Plan Amendments collectively. The site specific Comprehensive Plan Amendments will be presented individually. a. CPA-2019-0004: A City Initiated Amendment to update implementation strategics to remove completed strategies, update timelines, and add new strategies consistent with the goals and policies in the Comprehensive Plan. CPA-2019-0000: A City Initiated Amendment to Annexation and policy additions. CPA-2019-0008 A City initiated Amendment to create a new map appendix of the most recently adopted maps. Ms. Barlow introduced Comprehensive Plan amendment CPA-2019-0004. Ms, Barlow explained that this will modify some strategies in Chapter 2 to refresh some language and bring it into lune with the City's objectives. This will remove strategies that have been coropieted, update timelines and modify with new information. Ms. Barlow continued with CPA-2019-0006 advising that this would modify one existing Land Use goal and one existing Land Use policy regarding annexation and will add one additional policy. 02-25-2019 Pim n inz Commission Minmtcs Page 3 oi'LS Lastly, Ms. Barlow explained CPA-2019-0008 introduces a new map appendix to the Comprehensive Plan. The maps are not new to the City but the appendix is new to the Comprehensive Plan. The appendix will capture the maps and attach them to the Comprehensive Plan making them more user friendly for public access. M . Barlow concluded that there have been no substantive comments related to any of the amendments she presented. There was nopubfrc comment, b. CPA-2019-0005: A City Initiated Amendment to update tlxe pedestrian and bicycle component of the Transportation Element and related goals and policies. CPA-2019-0007: A City Initiated Amendment to update Figures 2fi 27 and 46 to reflect changes and amendments to pedestrian and bicycle facility recommendations. CPA-2019-0010: A City Initiated Amendment to create a new appendix of transportation project for a 20-year period that is informed by existing studies. Transportation Planner Colin Quinn-Hurst introduced Comprehensive Plan amendment CPA-2019-0005. Mr. Quinn-llurst explained that this amendment updates the pedestrian and bicycle components in completing the pathway and trait network. This will add language to support consideration of a Complete Streets ordinance, Mr. Quinn-Hurst explained that the bicycle and pedestrian plan was first established in 2011, and the updates will revise the components to reflect changes in the network based on current conditions and practicalities. The 2011. recommendations included a network of 156 miles of sidewalk, 38 miles of bike lanes and 28 miles of new pathways. Mr. Quinn-Hurst explained that with 156 miles at 9;600.ou per foot for a new side walk the cost is a substantial arrloLLttt of money adding up to half a billion and decades of time. Mr. Quinn-Hurst stated the City conducted a public involvement process that included attending community events and an online survey. Through the survey it was determined that the top priority for improvements was a completed sidewalk system the second was good pavement, and third was pathway and bikeway improvements followed by crosswalks. The City administered a technical evaluation looking at c-rashes and safety, congestion and travel patterns, to find "hot spots„ where improvements would have the largest impact and they fit in line with public comment. In conclusion adding text to Chapter 5 would outline these priorities,acid language to support the goal of connecting the pathway network by linking the Apploway Trail to the Centennial Trail, Lastly this amendment would add language supporting eventual consideration of a Complete Streets ordinance to leverage existing funding. Mr. Quinn-Hurst continued with CPA-2019-0007 advising this proposal is to update the Sidewalk, Bicycle and School District Maps to reflect completed projects and updated networks. Mr. Quinn-Hurst highlighted CPA-2019-0010 advising this amendment will create an appendix showing a list of 20-year transportation projects. This will be regularly updated as a resource for vetting and developing our transportation projects to make them eligible for grant opportunities, Mt. Quinn-Hurst concluded that there have been no substantive comments related to any amendments he presented. Q2-211-2419 Planning Commission Mignrtes Pap 4 of 15 Commissioner Johnson stated he is somewhat disappointed that the Pines Road grade separation at Trent Avenue is going to take seven years. He hopes there will be a way to accelerate the schedule to keep within the $29 million budget. There was no public corrr,raene, e. CPA-2019-00001: A Privately Initiated Amendment to Change the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation from Industrial (1) to Single Family Residential (SFR) amt to change the Zoning District from Industrial (I) to Single Family Residential Urban (R-3). Plattner Karen Kendall introduced CPA-2019-0001 a privately initiated Comprehensive Plan amendment located 300 feet south of the itttersection of Park Road and Broadway Avenue. This site-specific Comprehensive Plan Map and Zoning Map amendment is requesting to change the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation from Industrial (1) to Single Family Residential (SFR) and to change the Zoning District from Industrial (I) to Single Family. Ms. Kendall went oti to explain the potential inconipatib lity of rezoning the site to R- 3 flop Industrial as it would reduce the allowable fuses from a broad range of industrial uses to single family, duplex, cottages, townhomes, daycares, school and church uses. The R-3 zone would allow six dwelling units per acre and up to 12 units per acre with cottage development. Clinging the land use designation and zoning of the subject parcel will impact adjacent industrial properties as future development will be subject to transitional regulations, limiting ability for full site development. The transitional standards include greater setbacks, screening requirements and various other restr'ietions. Ms_ Kendall explained that if approved,the transitional regulations would applyto atny new development en the four parcels adjacent to the subject parcel located to the west and south. Ms. Kenndall went on to explain that two of the surrounding parcels have hail recent activity. One parcel has an active building permit and the other has gone through a pre-application meeting, both for industrial development. Ms. Kendall concluded that staff has received standard agency comments with,nothing substantive. Staff has also received three additional public comments and summarized that the concerns were specific to redevelopment oldie adjacent parcels,the industrial nature of the area and traffic impacts on Park Road. Ms. Kendall concluded that this amendment is not consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. Commissioners Kelley asked if the property located south cast of the parcel will have little to no impact and it wrns concluded to be true. Commissioner Kelley also questioned green zone compliance (transitional regulations) with existing parcels should this amendment be approved and it was determined that once the lots are developed they would have to comply with transitional regulations. Commissioner Johnson discussed the property located at Broadway Avenue and Prixlc Road being commercial and the transitional impact to those sia'rounding it should this amendment be approved or denied Ms. Kendall explained that it would depend on what zone they proposed to change to in order to determine what types of impacts would be associated, if any at ale Danny Davis, 2780 W Ingo Street, Post Falls, I1): Mi. Davis gave a presentation to the Conuinissioii and audience. lir. Davis explained that he is the owner of the Circle .1 Mobile Home Park adjacent to the proposed parcel. Mr.Davis described his argument to be that the current zoning is possibly wrong today. He went on to explain that what exists today is a beautiful mobile home park consisting of sixty-one low income Douses, 07-25-2019 Planning Commission Minutes P gc 5 Dr t5 for seniors fifty-five and over surrounded by Industrial. Mr. Davis detailed the current uses that are allowable next to these homes to be dog kennels, animal processing, crematorium and heavy truck industrial sales. Mr. Davis explained that they believe the zoning has been incorrect since implementation. Mr. Davis continued that his proposal is in lute with the City's Comprehensive Plan such as providing land uses that are essential to residents and to enable development of affordable housing for all income levels. Mr. Davis explained that their plan is to build a fifty-five and over cottage style development for seniors in turn providing innovative and affordable housing types for all income levels.Mr.Davis advised they have reached out to their neighbors to discuss the transitional zoning and understand their concerns. Mr. Davis promised that should their application be approved they will self-implement the transitional buffets onto their property as they do not want the thirty-foot buffer to encroach onto their neighbors. Mr. Davis concluded that a residential rezoning is much more compatible, will remain in line with the City's Comprehensive Plan's goals and policies, and promised their neighborhood friendly development plan would not negatively impact the surrounding properties. Commissioner Johnson asked Mr. Davis when the Circle J was purchased and what the zoning of the neighboring parcels were at that time. Mr. Davis advised they purchased the property six years prior and the zoning was Industrial at the time it was purchased. Curt Neat], 18552 W Rice Avenue, Homer, ID: Mr. Nead stated he is representing the Crow family trust for Mr. Jim Crow at 1201 N Evergreen Road. Mr. Nead advised they share a property line with the subject property and they feel this change would negatively impact their property when it conies to the setback requirements. Mir. Nead asked without a plats in place how would the promise by the development be enforced? Mr. Nead stated their property would be made unattractive to potential buyers and would take away fi.ttn a opportunities. Ma`. Nead concluded that developing a senior community where access would merge into active Industrial traffic on Park Road would not be conducive to safety. Mr. Nead stated they agree with staff that this is not in keeping with the City's goals and policies and believe it should he denied. Jim Chavez, 15902 E 15'' Ave, Spokane Valley WA: Mr. Chaves read a statement on behalf of his brother Brian Chaves whom is the property owner at N 630 Park Road adjacent to the proposed amendment. Mr. Brian Chaves is not in favor of the proposal. He respectfully requests that the Commission look at the incompatibility issues and continued that the transitional igulattons will be detrimental to his properly. Mr. Cleaves notes that the self-imposed regulations can't be promised and he is opposed to the proposed zoning changes. Joel!Iger,24327 E Maxwell,Liberty Lake,WA: Mr. Elgee stated he is a proponent and knows the applicant personally and spoke to his good character. He stated that if Mr. Davis promises to do something he will. Mr. Elgee added that this proposed site and the surrounding properties seem to be limited with the current zoning. d. CPA-2019-0002: A. Privately Initiated Amendment to change the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation front Single Family Residential (SFR) to Neighborhood Commercial (NC) and to change the Zoning District from Single Family Residential Urban -3) to Neighborhood Commercial (NC) Planner Marty Palaiiink presented CPA-2019-0002, explaining this is a privately initiated amendment to change the Comprehensive Plan. Land Use Designation from Single.Family Residential (SSR) to Neighborhood Commercial (NC)and to change the 02-28-2019 Infirm rag Commission Minualus Page G or IS Zoning District from Single Family Residential Urban (R-3) to Neighborhood Commercial C). Mr. Palaniralc stated that the property k located at Ser'Avenue and Sullivan Road. 8l1' Avenue is a minor arterial, and Sullivan Road is a principal arterial with approximately 20,000 vehicle trips per day. This is directly across the street from Central Valley High School which creates significant traffic. North of the high school there has been substantial multifamily developments creating significant density. Mr. Palaniuk staged. that this site consists of two properties, one owned by the Genesis Church and one residence. There is an irrigation district located to the west of the property and a Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) easement along the east. The BPA easement encumbers bath of the properties along the east boundary and does create same issues. Mr. Palaniuk explained the intent of the Comprehensive Plan land use designation for these properties is to have single family residential units. If approved this would change the land use designation to Neighborhood Commercial, which is intended to provide neighborhood scaled commercial developments to serve the neighborhoods. Mr. Palaniuk explained the current zoning of R-3 limits the uses to residential, changing the zoning would allow several additional uses to include retail, office and convenience stores. He added the development restrictions tc the Neighborhood Commercial zone would keep the scale of the development to fit into the neighborhood. For example, height requirements would be the saute mid setbacks would be designed to be consistent with the adjacent residential lots, Mr, Palaniuk stated there have been no substantive comments from staff or public related to this amendment, Mr. Palaniuk concluded that this proposal is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan, Commissioner Walton asked if other Neighborhood Commercial zones that has been identified in the Coinpr'eheiisive Plan had experienced any increase traffic flow or traffic pattern impacts following redesignation or development? Mr. Palaniuk explained that the only NC zone which had developed was a coffee/espresso stand located at 1 tith Avenue and Sullivan Road and there have been no significant traffic pattern impacts. Commissioner Johnson asked Mr. Palaniuk if lie was Aware of an easement which would allow 9`i` Avenue to extend to Progress Road. Mr. Palaniuk stated he was unaware of any. Commissioner Johnson was concerned that if 9111 Avenue was extended it might impact the homes along 9th Avenue.. Commissioner Walton asked about the residential parcel's access points onto 9'"Avenue,one being from the Church parking lot and another from the daycare. Commissioner Johnson added there would be nothing to preclude them from adding access to 9l'' Avenue. It was concluded that the parcel with the single family residence would be allowed access to Sullivan Road and 911z Avenue. Ben Goodmansen-Whipple Consulting Engineers,ers, 21 S Pines Road, Spokane Valley,WA: Mr. Goodmansen thanked the staff for their work advised they agree with the Staff Report. Mr. Goodmansen explained they feel this Land Use change is an appropriate one, not only for the immediate neighborhood but for those to the South. Mr. Cxondinansen explained that the Coffee Espresso Stand on 16th Ave is a good Neighborhood Commercial development and he pointed out that it is on the "going home" side of the roadway. He added that they are seeing growth to the South and commercial access is becoming necessary especially on the "going home" side of the road. Mr. Goodmansen mentioned the access for the smaller parcel at 910 S Sullivan Road has two access point, one on 911' Avenue and one on Sullivan Road, Lastly, Mr. 02-28-2019 P lowing Commission hA[autos Pogo 7 of 15 Goodmansen mentioned that the property owner Mr. Ford approached members of the neighborhood to include the church and had positive feedback. Stephen Ford, 320 S Sullivan Road, Spokane Valley, WA: Mr. Ford advised he is an attorney and his current office is located art 320 S Sullivan Road where it has become increasingly commercial which is not needed for the rratnre of his business. Mr. Ford pursed the proposed property at 902 S Sullivan Road with intent to put a law office there. He advised he spoke to the homeowners on 9th Avenue and the cul-de-sac to discuss the proposal. He stated the response was overwhelmingly supportive.Mr. Ford explained that he would be creating a nice entry into the neighbaarhood and separate the neighbors from Sullivan Reaact, Currently the main access to 902 S Sullivan Road is off Sullivan Road with a secondary access off of 9thE Ave -Avenue both appropriate fin a Law Office. Mr. Ford stated he encourages the Commission to accept the recommendation. C. CPA-2019-0003 A Privately Initiated Amendment Comprehensive Plum Land Use Designation from Single Family Residential (SFR) to Multi Family Residential (MFR) and to change the Zoning District from Siegle Family Residential Urban (R-3) to Multi Family Residential MEM Mr. Palaniuk presented CPA-2019-1003, a privately initiated amendment to change the Compreheasive Plan Lend Use Designation from Single Family Residential (SFR) to Multifamily Residential (MFR) and to change the Zoning District from Single Family Residential Urban (R-3) to Multifamily Residential (MFR). Mr. Palaniuk stated the property is located near the ailullanFArgoune Road corridor. Both reads are principal arterials that are heavily (raveled. Mr. Palaniuk added that the corridor is mostly commercial uses, with a large retail eenter located northeast of the site. Mr. Palaniuk continued that this site is situated on the northwest corner of Siartc Avenue and Marguerite Road within an elder neighborhood. The site is a single parcel with two duplexes and a single family home constructed on site. Current regulations would not permit the numerous dwellings on one lot, Mr. Palaniuk continued explaining the current uses which are adjacent to the site and are commercial The intent of this amendment is to change the current land use designation of Single Family Residential to Multifamily Residential, The change would allow multifamily development and low impact commercial development, and would change the zoning regulations significantly. The density would allow additional units. Mr. Palaniuk added currently the Single Family Residential allows a density of up to six units per acre, multifamily would allow up to 22 units per acre_ however; on this site the size would be limited to a maximum of 20 units, if the existing buildings were to be raised and multifamily was undertaken 20 units would be the maximum allowed. Mr. Palanitik continued adding that the most significant change would be increasing the height requirements from 35 feet to 50 feet, and the setback requirements. Mr. Palaniuk stated staff did not receive any agency comments. Mr. Palaniuk stated there has been one public comment received, and they are opposed to the change. Mr. Paahiniuk concluded Lhat this proposal is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. Commissioner Kelley asked for clarification that a multifamily zone has to be adjacent to a higher intensity right-of-way of like zone, and can be separated by right of way? Mr.Palaniuk explained that this being an area wide amendment and not a site specific rezone, it does not have to meet that criteria. It was also clarified that the Commercial zone across the public right of way would meet the criteria of a higher intensive zone district. 02-28-2019 Plouiriii Cornw issidn Minr.it rage 8 of 15 Commissioner Walton added that with this being part of the Comprehensive Plan process even though it is applying to a specific parcel that requirement is not necessary even though this does border a higher use zone. Walton discussed the future opportunity created if this were rezoned as multifamily since it would allow similar rezoning of surrounding properties, or would those properties he required 10 apply for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment, It was clarified that they would have to apply for a Comprehensive Plan amendment. Deputy City Attorney Eric Lamb advised that the staff report identifies the code requirements for Compzehensiv'e Plan approval by looking at consistency with the Comprehensive Plan as well as suibstantial relation to public safety and welfare. The surrounding area plays into a lot of those points but is not necessarily a check box at this point in time. Commissioner Rasmussen asked if the owner of the parcel is seeking to subdivide the property into four different lots and read the application stating such, Ms. Barlow explained that they may have identified that specific language however if this is approved there is nothing binding them to do exactly what is written, the plan could change to include multiple options, r. Palarxtuk explained that a pre-application meeting was done and those details were listed hut it can change. Mr. Palaniuk stated that in changing this to Multifamily zoning it would be more advantageous for them to subdivide the property to have the smaller lot sizes. Mr. Palaniuk added that it could be subdivided now under the Single Family Residential zoning, however the lots would have to be bigger and the duplex lots would have to be 10,000 square feet versus 4,000 square feet under the Multifamily zoning. Commissioner Walton asked what the total size of the lot was, and it was noted to be joist under an acre. Commissioner Johnson asked for confirmation that they can have parking in the transitional area as long as it has appropriate screening. Mr. Palaniuk stated if this develops as Multifamily that is correct. Joel Agee, 24327 E Maxwell, Liberty Lake, WA: Mr. Elgee stated he was appreciative of Staffs recommendation and thanked them for their work, Mr. Elgee stated after looking at the current uses his intent would be in keeping with the City's Comprehensive Plan by providing affordable house opportunities. He continuo ed that the intent of the owner is not to tear anything down and build new as that would not make financial sense, He explained they wvould keep the existing and would possibly build an eight to ten-unit apartment type structure with access off of Sinto Avenue or Marguerite Road. Mr. Elgee added that this would provide public improvements to the streets as well. Connissianer Kelley asked the applicant if he was familiar with the current vacancy rates in the Valley? Mr. Agee advised that depending on the unit size generally they are around three percent. Commissioner Kelley confirmed that five percent is considered run occupancy. Mr. Ogee. stated that alp to four or five years ago the area was at 10 percent vacancy, With this being a smaill project this would add to that vacancy rate where it's needed. Micluiel Porter, 8919 E Boone Avenue, Spokane Valley, WA: Mr. Porter stated he and his family has lived in the area for 20 plus years and traffic is increasing on both Sinto Avenue and Marguerite Road, Mr. Ported stated the neighbors will have problems with parking as the streets are narrow and stated he is not in favor of the proposal. Mae Greenwood, 8802 E Boone Avenue, Spokane Valley, WA1 Ms. Greenwood thanked the Commission for the opportunity to speak. Ms. Greenwood is concerned O2.2 2019 Pinning ComuniNsion Minutes Papp 9 oris with safety, traffic impacts and the on street and off street parking. Ms. Greenwood stated the neither Sinto Avenue or Marguerite Road are arterials and there is no clear access to the businesses. Ms. Greenwood thanked Mr. Palaniuk for mentioning her comment adding that the public does not know how to comment as access isn't always apparent. Ms. Greenwood stated she is opposed to this proposal. John Rohrhacic, 8722 E into Avenue, Spokane Valley, WA: Mr, Rohrback stated his property is adjacent to the proposed site and his concern is with the size of the building and the appearance of the neighborhood. 1-Ic is also concerned with parking, traffic and and safety of those walking the streets. Mr. Rohrback mentioned concerns with a driveway coming from Sinto Avenue. Mr. Rohrback asked that if this is approved the units be kept to a bare minimum to help with parking and traffic issues, Jolene McGuire 8810 E Sinto Avenue, Spokane Valley, WA: Ms. iVicGuire spoke about the conflicting information as to what is going to be constructed and gave examples of proposed developments, Ms. McGuire is worried about access due to the corner of Sinto Avenue and Marguerite Road being a hazardous corner and is also concerned with parking_ She is also concerned for her privacy in her home as being looked in upon with the height requirement changes. Ms. MeGuire asked for more clarification as to what is being proposed as there are too many safety issues and she is opposed to the Irr-oposal. Daniel Harrington, 8817 E Suite Avenue,Spokane Valley, WA: Mr. Harrington is opposed to the proposal and is concerned for the safety of the children in the area as there are no sidewalks rind kids play in the street. Mr. Harrington stated this would also take away his neighbors model airplane landing strip and the deer would no longer visit. Mr. Harrington stated this would not be in keeping with the character of the neighborhood. He is not in favor and asked the Commission to keep the neighborhood sa fe. Commissioner Johnson asked Mr. Palaniuk what kind of improvements would be required if they were to put a 20-unit development? Mr. Palaniuk advised they would have to provide sidewalks, a Swale, curb and gutter along Marguerite Road and Sinto Avenue. There was some discussion regarding dinheusions for the street and sidewalk improvements. Commissioner Walton asked if under the current R-3 zoning would allow the parcel to be subdivided into eight separate lots at 5,000 square feet niluimum? Mr, Palaniuk advised the City would apply the density standard which would allow six units per acre, if changed to Multifamily it would allow for 20 units based an the size of the lot if the two duplexes and single family were removed from the property. Conamniissioner Kasehmitter asked that if sidewalks were required would it encroach onto the properties along Marguerite Road? It was concluded that all of the improvements would be along the frontage of the proposed site and no other properties would lose any frontage. Commissioner Jolmson asked for clarification regarding changing the zoning when no other multifamily was contiguous to the subject parcel. Ms. Barlow explained that this can be considered regardless, because it is a Comprehensive Plan amendment, not a rezone, however if the City were looking at it via the rezoning criteria this would have to be adjacent or contiguous to a property zoned of equal or higher intensity. In this case the commercial property across the right-of-way to the east is a higher intensity use. 1)2-28-2019'Planing Commission Minuics ?age 1&or 15 j. CPA-2019-0009: A City initiated Amendment Proposal to change Comprehensive Plan land use designation and zoning district from Multifamily Residential (MFR) to Corridor Mixed Use (CMU). Planner Karen Kendall introduced CP.A-2019-0009 a City initiated Comprehensive Plan to change the land use designation and zoning district from Multifamily Residential to Corridor Mixed Use. Ms. Kendall explained the property involved is 18.7 acres and includes 12 parcels of land north of Mission Avenue between McDonald Road on the west and Mamer Road to the east. Ms. Kendall explained that there is a 150-foot-wide Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) easement - crossing the properties and noted that the properties were largely developed as the Whimsical Pig with other various owners and uses Ms. Kendall went on to explain the surrounding uses of the site include single-family residence, multifamily, professional offices, assisted living and retail. The intent of the Comprehensive Plan land use designation is to provide land that will allow light manufacturing, retail, multifamily and offices along transpiration corridors - the uses in the arca currently fit the intent. Ms. Kendall explained that should this change occur; the amendment area would be allowed to further develop consistently with the adjacent land uses. Ms. Kendall continued that the zone change would allow uses that align with the intent of the Comprehensive plait along the major transportation corridor being Mission Avenue. Ms. Kendall concluded that there is limited development opportunity for these properties. This proposal would allow development along the corridor consistent with the corridor and would not create any nonconforming use with the change. The Corridor Mixed Use designation has no height limitations; in comparison the current Multifamily Residential zone is limed to 50 feet in height. However, there are not many buildings that currently push or exceed the 50-foot height limit. Ms. Kendall added the Corridor Mixed use has no density limits and the change may allow an increase in the density [loin 22 dwelling units per acre to no limit however this is not likely due to building placement, parking and landscaping. Ms, Kendall advised staff has received no public comment. Staff has however received one agency comment from Washington State Department of Transportation asking for additional transportation information. Ms. Kendal stated the City's traffic engineer provided a Trip Generation and Distribution letter concluding there is adequate capacity. Ms. Kendall concluded that the amendment would make the location consistent with the surrounding area and is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Commissioner Johnson asked for an explanation on the voluntary impact fee mentioned in the transportation report. Senior Traffic Engineer Ray Wright explained that in working with developers and consultants the City has created the Is/fireboat] Subarea Plan. The intent of this plait was to look at existing conditions of the streets, what developments might occur within the zoning of each and expected traffic impacts. Mr. Wright explained that within the Mirabeau Subarea Plan there is a fee associated with the specific amount of trips needed to complete the analysis. Mr. Lamb clarified that impact fees have not been adopted under the Growth Management Act, These fees are technically mitigation fees similar to those identified in the Planned Action Ordinance for the northeast industrial area. As part of environmental review, developers are required to complete the traffic analysis. Similarly, with the Mirabeau Subarea Plan there has been an agreement as to what project may be coining and provide some certainly for the cost of those trips. Developers are allowed to enter into this Subarea Plan voluntarily, Mr. Lamb added 02-25-2019 Planning Commission M imam Page I I of 15 that Washington State Department of Transportation wanted to clarify if the parcels were changed to Corridor Mixed Use that the City has sufficient capacity, We reviewed the proposal and concluded that we do. Commissioner Walton asked what the maximum impact of this property would be if developed at its maximum potential,then would the traffic analysis bear out or would there need to be additional improvements, Mr. Wright stated they did consider that possibility as this is a large piece of property. Mr. Wright stated that if this were converted to a hospital that it would increase the trips considerably, and that professional judgement was used to determine what can be supported. Commissioner Kelley clarified that Mr. Wright reviewed the amount of traffic which he expects new development to generate. Ms. Barlow explained that the initial answer that staff was looking for was whether or not there was capacity, and that has been addressed through analysis with Washington State Department of Transportation. Future impacts from development will be under discussion with the City and Washington State Department of Transportation, however that would not be provided to the Commission as part of the current process. Sharon Janson-13607 E Mission Ave, Spokane Valley, WA: Ms. Janson explained that there is a lot of uncertainty and she is not sure as to what can be built. She explained that her property includes the irrigation ditch, and she isn't sure what would happen to her property. Chair Johnson closed the public hearing at 8:13 PM After a detailed discussion it was concluded that all City initiated Code Text Amendments CPA-2019-0004, CPA-2019-0006, CPA-2019-0008, CPA-2019-0005, CPA.-2019-0007 and CPA-2019-0010 would be combined as a collective motion and vote. Commissioner Walton moved to CPA-2019-0005, CPA-2019-0006, /ssix City y{Initiated+Code Text 1.m�endm[en[tys CPA-2019-0004, CPA-201 9-0005, CPA-201 9-0006, CP —201 9-000 f, C1' -201 9- 0008 and CPA-2019-0010 as presented by the City. Commissioner Walton thanked the Staff for their work on each amendment. Commissioner Johnson ConeLirred. The voce on The motion rims ria Miami.and zero opposed and the motion passed. CPA-2019-0001 Commissioner Johnson stated he knows a party involved and recused himself from deliberation. lie passed the gavel to Commissioner Walton Arid left the room. Commissioner Kelley thanked the applicant, Danny Davis, for his enthusiasm and the work he had done. Commissioner Kelley continued that he would be voting against the proposal as he agreed with land owners. Commissioner Rasmussen advised she had driven the location to familiarize herself with the area. Her concern is the Industrial environment along Park Roast. Commissioner Rasmussen added that she is a proponent of Cottages and alternative housing types, however she is concerned for the properties adjacent and will be voting against. Commissioner McKinley stated he was torn on the proposal and feels that if it were developed as proposed it would provide needed additional low income housing for seniors. However, the area is Industrial. Commissioner Sc.aschniitler explained that she sees both sides with the need for senior housing and the need for Industrial. She feels that with the current zoning of Industrial it should be left as such,adding that it is harder to rezone to Industrial. After considering 02.28-2019 Planning Commission Mi nibs Pap 12 of 15 public comment and the difficulty to enforce the promise related to buffers she is opposed to the proposal. Commissioner Walton discussed blending uses rind explained that his concern is the impact to the surrounding properties, He applauded the applicant's creativity in self-imposing the setbacks however it would riot alleviate all setback requirements to the'Industrial lots. Commissioner Walton concluded that there is existing Industrial infrastructure on a large portion of the mobile home park to the south and also mentioned the current application End permits. Commissioner Walton stated he will be.voting against the proposal following City recommendations. Commissioner Kelley moved to deny CPA-2.019-0011 as presented. There Was no • discussion. The vole on the motion afros five in favor and zero opposed and the 'notion passed Commissioner Jof711,t007 returned at 8:28 PM CPA-2019-0002- Commissioner Johnson commented that this is almost what they wrote the Land Use into the code for, adding that with the light there and the traffic, the neighborhood commercial expansions are perfect for what the Commission had intended. Commissioner Kelley commented on the"going home"side of the, street and how important that was; and that the City does need development here. Commissioner Walton stated he sees this as being in line with the Comprehensive Plan. He added that his only reservation would be to encourage crosswalk and signage should this be developed to prevent vehicle verses pedestrian interactions. Commissioner Walton concluded that he is in favor. Commissioner Rasmussen agreed that this is a good use and thanked the applicant for reaching out to the neighbors. Commissioner ICasehmitter stated she is in support of the proposal and thanked the applicant for speaking with the neighbors. Commissioner McKinley stated he is in support. Commissioner Walton moved to approve CPA-2019-0002 as presented, There was no discussion. The vote on the ,notion was six ill frriror•rind zero opposed and the ;notion passed CPA-2019-0003 Commissioner Kelley stated he is sympathetic to public comments related to safety. He added that should this be developed there will be curbs and sidewalks that will help in regards to safety keeping people and children off of the street, Commissioner Kelley stated he is in favor of the proposal. Commissioner Walton stated he will be opposing the amendment. IIe stated there will be sidewalk and swales, however, they will end without connections, causing safety concerns. Commissioner Walton continued that if approved he feels it would be creating an island for additional Multifamily residential applications moving forward, creating higher uses iii an area that claw not have infrastructure that supports this kind of development. Commissioner Walton thanked the applicant for their ideas, is respectful of the idea for additional affordable housing, conc[uding that he will be voting no on this proposal. Commissioner Kaschinitter agreed with Commissioner Walton and his comments regarding the sidewalks adding that there would be access and parling issues and will not be supporting the proposal. Commissioner McKinley stated he did not believe he would be supporting the proposal. Commissioner Rasmussen stated she was on the fence gadding that the drove the site and is familiar with the road. She added that the area has several sections of duplexes and some commercial toward the end of Mission Avenue. Commissioner Rasmussen stated the environment does fit the proposal and will be voting iu favor. Commissioner Rasmussen added that she understands the neighbors' concerns adding that the lots tire large and there should he ample space far 02.28-20I 9 Pinning Commission tog 111ge L3 of 15 parking. Commissioner Johnson also drove the area several times mentioning that there is a large amount of open space to the back of the properties that does not appear to be well used. Commission Johnson reiterated that his argument for having a medium density zoning and land use as this would be perfect for row houses. Commissioner Johnson stated that this may be starting a slippery slope if this is approved, however he feels that the owners of the properties will find an increase in property value that will allow them to move to an area that provides the type of life they are looking for. He continued that he feels this change is appropriate and will be voting in favor adding that once this is under development there will be infrastructure improvements that will have to be made. Commissioner Walton stated he considered the existing non-conforming uses trying to divide the lot as it exists tinder the current zoning and determined it could be done. Commissioner Walton spoke about lot sizes and duplex units and densities in order to conform. Commissioner Walton added. if zoned Multifamily lie understands the concerns from the homeowners. Commissioner Walton has concerns about access and does not feel like this is the right time for this application and will be voting against. Commissioner Johnson stated that when you look at the area as a whole it lends more to a Multifamily zone, Commission Kelley spoke about the vacancy rates being unheard of at three percent. Adding that this is a great location with access to bus service, restaurants and retail. commissioner Walton pointed out that he sees there is a flaw in the thought process for the evening. Adding that should this be developed in the future there would be sidewalk improvements providing access to bus routes however at present the sidewalks would go nowhere. Commissioner Walton stated that he feels creating this one small area hoping for more to follow is potentially poor foresight on the part of the Commission. Corrrmissioirer Kelley asked for clarification from Commissioner Walton regarding his stance on Multifamily and it was concluded that Commissioner Walton is not opposed to Multifamily hut feels this proposal would provide a "base property" that may create additional adjoining properties. Commissioner Walton concluded that right now the commission is looking at creating higher occupancy for a single property that creates a non-conforming usage in this area. Commissioner Kelley spoke about sidewalks stating that currently there are no sidewalks and the addition of them would be a plus. Commissioner Kelley moved to approve CPA-29l9-[}U 3 as presented. The vote on the motion by u showing of hands was three in favor and( wee opposed. Secretary Deanna Horton highlighted procedural voting requirements that a Comprehensive Plan amendment recommendation can only be moved forward with a vote of four, It was concluded that another motion be made with a hope for a fourth or this moves forward with no recommendation. Commissioner Kelley moved to approve CPA-2019-0003 as presented. The vote on the motion by cr showing of hands was three in favor and three opposed to motion fails and amendment moves fbrwcrr°d with no recommendation. CPA-2019-0009 Commissioner Walton stated he is torn as all uses conform with the existing Multifamily Residential and is unsure as to what this change would do to future intent. He spoke about the maximum potential development for a rezone not just the current zone and spoke about traffic flow and access to the hospital. Commissioner Walton stated he is opposed at this time due to future potential. Commissioner Rasmussen asked for clarification in regards to a property addressed during public comment and if the property is within two zones. Ms. Kendall explained that the property is directly on the corner of Mamer Road and Mission Avenue or is one of the D2-26-2019 Phoning Commission Minutes rage 14 or 15 four single family residences, Ms. Kendall provided clarification by using the reap and stated that the property does span across the irrigation canal. Commissioner Johnson asked if all property to the man are Corridor Mixed Use and it was determined to be true. Commissioner Kelley moved to extend the meeting to 9:15 PM The vote on Mc mol on was six in Aviv and zero opposed and the motion passed. Commissioner Kelley agreed with Commissioner Walton's concerns however, he is in favor. Commissioner Kelley continued that he sees a lot of potential for development with great access to Pines Road, Evergreen Road and Sullivan Road. Commissioner Kelley added he does not believe traffic would inhibit the hospital. Commissioner Kaschmitter stated she is on the fence. She secs the potential and also sees what is existing and that it's working as is. Commissioner McKinley isn't sure why the change is needed and is not in favor. Commissioner Kaschmitter added something to consider would be changes in taxes should this be approved. Commissioner Rasmussen stated that this ties in with the Comprehensive Plan's goals and mission in bringing development and jobs. Commissioner Rasmussen added that she drove the area and this proposal fits, adding that this being a City initiated amendment this will pave the way for future development. Commissioner Rasmussen spoke on the transportation issue that once a development is proposed it will be reviewed concluding she will be voting for this proposal. Commissioner Johnson stated he also drove this area and spoke about the expandable area for additional parking and access. He saw several units on the ground floor that could be used for medical offices and sees benefit. Commissioner Johnson added that should this be -redeveloped it is exactly what the hope was Commissioner Johnson seated in his opinion this would be a benefit to the City and is in favor. Commissioner Walton is in support of the proposal and sees great potential for mixed use opportunities. Commission= Walton added that the use does conform with the adjoining uses. He continued he does have concern that access on Mission Avenue is not very good, however he feels most of the traffic would feed toward Pines Road if redeveloped and is in support, Commissioner Johnson added that should this be developed into medical offices that use would not be during rush hour and would be spread out throughout the day and does riot see added traffic being an issue. Commissioner Johnson conclude that.he is sympathetic to single family homes and feels that the residents will be in a good situation to sell their property and move to a much more single family type of environment. • Commissioner Walton moved to approve CPA-2019-0003 as presented by the City. The vote on flee nw/ion was jive in favor and one opposed and the motion passed. Commissioner Kasclimitter• expressed her concern about apartments being moved somewhere else in the valley deeper into an R-3 zone. X, GOOD OL THE ORDER: Commissioner McKinley stated he will not be attending the next meeting clue to work conflict. Commissioner Walton thanked the public lic for their comment. Commissioners Johnson apologized to the commission for CPA-2019- 0001 as he did not realize until public testimony that he had a business relationship with one of the neighboring owners, He could have remained impartial, however perception was more important and recused himself, Commissioner Kelley stated that if Commissioner Johnson felt he could have been impartial he could have stayed. Ms. Barlow noted that with Commissioners Phillips and McKinley being absent at the next meeting and Commissioner Johnson teeming himself, that clue to voting tequircnients we may be in a position to move the Findings to the next meeting. Commissioner 02-28-2019 Planning Commission ission Mii utcs Page 15 of 15 Walton asked for procedural clarifications pertaining to the voting requirements with the absentees and Commissioner Johnson recusing himself. Mr, Lamb stated that this is a written recommendation from the Planning Commission and is memorialized as part of ihe vote. It was concluded that under the rules of order that at least four votes are needed to move a Comprehensive Plan amendment forward. XL ADJOURNMENT: Commissioner McKinley moved to adjourn the meeting at 9:13 p.m. The vote on the mofkin t1'cm unanimous. in favor, zero a,gainsi, and the motion paswee. James Johnson, Chairman Date signed 1,+ tit Robin I-Iutchins, Secretary Regular Meeting minutes Spokane Valley Planning Commission Council Chambers — City Flail March 14,2019 I. Chair Johnson called the meeting to order at 6:02 p.m. II.. Commrssirrrcrs, shill and audience stood for the pledge of allegiance. III. Office Assistant Robin I-Xutchius called toll and the following members and staff were present: James Johnson Cary Driskell, City Attorney Danielle Kaschrrtter Jenny Nickerson, Building Official Timothy Kelley Lori Barlow, Senior Planner- Robert McKinley, absent-excused Karen Kendall, Planner Michael Phillips, absent- excused Martin Palaniuk, Planner Michelle Rasmussen Colin Quinn-Ilurst, Planner Matt Walton Robin Hutchins, Office Assistant Hearing no objections, Commissioners Phillips and McKinley were excused from the meeting. IV. AGENDA: Commissioner Walton moved to approve the Iviarch 14,2019 agenda as presented. • There was no discussion. The vote on the motion was jive in favor, zero opposed, cetwl the motion passed V. MINUTES: Chair Johnson explained that due to time restraints in reviewing the minutes by staff there have been some changes. He continued that the Commission members were provided a redline version of the minutes correcting minor errors. The Commission was given some time to review the minutes. Commissioner Kuehn-litter asked that her comment regarding CPA-20l 9-0009 be clarified on Page 1-, last sentence; her intent was that all apartments andfor development, not just the proposed apartments. Commissioner Walton suggested to Commissioner Kaselimitter removing "the" from the sentence and she agreed. Commissioner Walton moved to amend the minutes as presented in the redline version. Adding to strike "the" from Commissioner ICasehtnitter's statement, per her request, to read: Corr inissiotper Koschmitter expressed her concern about apartments being moved somewhere else in the valley deeper into an R-3 zone. The vote on the amended motion was jive in fervor, zero opposed, and the motion passed. Commissioner Walton moved to approve the minutes es amended. There was no discussion. The vote on the motion was.five in ft.or. zero opposed, and the motion passed. VI. COMMISSION REPORTS: Commissioner Rasmussen reported that she attended the City Council meeting,for the annual City accomplishments and it was great, she eouldn't be happier with the work staff is doing. VII. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT: Senior Planner Lori Barlow advised of additions to the advanced agenda with one being an amendment to modify the. City's inarijtiann regulations. 03.14.2019 I'IBnning Camnmislion Minutes tinge 2❑r3 She continued that the City has received a privately initiated Street Vacation and staff will also be bringing forward a City initiated Street Vacation. VIII. PUBLIC COMMENT: On any subject which is not on the agenda. There was no public comment. IX. COMMISSION BUSINESS: i, I inclings of Fact Proposal 2019 Comprehensive Plan Aiiicndmeiits Commissioner Johnson recused himself due to his previous relationship with a party involved and left the room at 6:10 p.m. Senior Planner Lori Barlow summarized the Findings of Fact for the 2019 Comprehensive Nan annual amendment cycle. Ms. Barlow explained the items came before the Commission on two prior occasions, On February 14, 2019; the PLatxning Commission held a study session, A public hearing was held on February 28, 2019, after which the PIanning Commission deliberated and voted on recommendations to Council. Ms. Barlow explained there were a number of privately and City initiated Comprehensive Plan amendments and the votes were captured in the Request for Planning Commission Review and further detailed in the Findings and Recommendations. Ms. Barlow highlighted the Corninissionn's votes pertaining to the privately initiated map amendments o 2P/.-2019-000l: The Planning Commission voted five in favor and zero opposed to forward to City Council a recommendation of denial. CPA-201.9-0002: The Planning Commission voted six in favor and zero opposed to forward to City Council a recommendation for approval, • CPA-2019-0003: The Planning Commission voted three in favor and three opposed to forward to City Council a recommendation of approval. However, Comprehensive Plast amendments require a vote of four members therefore this amendment moves forward without a recommendation. • CPA-2019-0M, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10: The Planning Commission voted six ill favor and zero opposed to forward to the City Council a recorraneadatioE1 of approval. Ms. Barlow concluded that the procedural requirements of the Growth Management Act guidelines require the amendments be considered and forwarded CUM ulatively. Commissioner Walton asked for clarification that the Commission is forwarding no recommendation on CPA-2019-0003 due to the tie, and Ms. Barlow confirmed that to be correct Commissioner Rasmussen moved to approve the Planning C007m177,ssion7 Findings of Fact recommendation as presented to the City Council. Commissioner Kelley addressed CPA-2019-0003 and the many discussions regarding sidewalks. Commissioner Kelley stated he drove the location and advised there are several sidewalks, some from Sint° Avenue to Mission Avenue and some from Marguerite Road to Argonne Road. He felt (he Commission may have missed that detail and wanted to note sidewalks do exist in the area. The vole 007 the atelier was lour-Th fevor, zero opposed, mid the rrtnlron passed, Commissioner Johnson returned at 6:18 PM 03-I4-2019 PIanniitig Camini s .h n Minutes P gc 3 of 3 X. GOOD O1 TIE ORDER: Them was nothing for good ai the oriel'. XI. ADJOURNMENT: Commissioner Walton moved to adjourn the meeting at 6:19 p.m. The �r fe on the motion was file in favor,or, aero opposed, and the motion passed, James Johnson, Chairman bale signed ,l/Qtr/I-C Robin Hutchins, Secretary oo'''*t%, Siokane Walley 2019 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendments Planning Commission Study Session February 14, 2019 CompPlan Annual Amendment Process • October 31 , 2018 deadline for applications (60 day notice) Docket • Adman Report — Discuss Process and i tr due Docket Nov. 13, 2018 • City Council ta,k es action on offkicd docket — Nov. 20, 2018 • Public Notk ru r — • . ' 1'1 •. • �.• •ostia on site for Site Specific CPA's - Planning Commission Study Session — F54°). 14, 2019 c Public Hearing — Deliberations and a Recommendations — Mar. 14, 2019 u • Administrative Report ,,.• • First Reading u • Second Rea Qrng Compiehensive Plan Amendment Process SVMC 17.80. 1 40 Elm Staff Role Planning City Council • Facilitate Process Commission • Legislative • Conducts Review • Conducts Public Decision and Analysis Hearing • Considers Public • Prepares • Deliberates and Comment Reports and Makes • Discretion to public notices Recommendation approve, modify, to Council or deny requests Planning Materials Yellow Binder ° Spokane de o Application Materials41212,,a/co,„, l{eYrens�Ye P/Qii ❑ Staff Report ` - ❑ Notices a ❑ Agency Comments • Public Comments ;.n p t4 ❑ Maps ❑ Any other related documents .,1 • °°' ,' r va I CriteriaStaffReport AnalysisA o Required Findings Other Considerations ❑ Supports public health, safety ❑ Effect on Environment welfare, and protects the ❑ Compatibility and impact on environment existing uses and neighborhoods ❑ Consistent with GMA and ❑ Adequacy and impact on Comprehensive Plan services ❑ Responds to a change in ❑ Benefit to City and Region conditions ❑ Quantity, Location and Demand ❑ Corrects an error for land ❑ Addresses a deficiency ❑ Protected population for area ❑ Other effects on Comp. Plan 2019 Amendments Privately Initiated City Initiated ❑ CPA-2019-0001 CPA-201 9-0004 ❑ GPA-2019-0002 LI CPA-2019-0005 o CPA-2019-0006 u CPA-2019-0003 ❑ CPA-2019-0007 ❑ CPA-2019-0008 ci CPA-2019-0009 r.° CPA-2019-0010 CPA-201 Strategies Amend Strategies Chapter strategies for implementation Th.5 r3tlii it it•clodzJ on 1.,,.....:I:!tvroua pat es+•<co;+pl1 tl her.:Iar rcferencc. Legend Far carts str.rte{,y.the rtnolcrnerttaticrs matrix prided Polar,also explores II Removed corn p I er t e d the relationship bensiecn ea lr gratm and the various eiemenb of the Comprclrertsiv•Mar.ciesironatesieadstaff ororgattI:atk,ntor implementation • 1—,,Lidi1�, .1ctivilt't:s.oOtlines a tare table tar eonrplcti.xa.and provides a rough sense of • i r;risporttien r,4attvt uriortly 1hou.fs the drat.tties are not rrarxiatory Ier the City.they are Update timelines � I+�,s;" = an important sv ntfctt into Spokane V.tltcyi approach to the in* of the CompreI -.ssree I bail olid they merit contlnaed evaluation by City staff, •C7.Yt:,,Fac iii Lies • i',..:LI:,_,;x r'I'h.Y.rl.H ilii ie4 e Modifyy with new information : : ; : ::..., E Develop new PRIMARY STRATEGY ELEMENT RELATED ELEMENTiS) PSN H TIMING PRIORITY unre,tats....,na::._rgwc ur.ril,g pr.Mi:as 0,445m,1-1.,c:J,.iar.,1::,.rnr5p,,x.,n.:•ratrrs • ■ • SD.Divkion: _Oy: HIGH ;»I sets ii,City s.11,en vi,zuel&ivwoultl•be Et5srr51Irkane doNt,or ..,u,,ilo,_ OT'ap4jt Ca t,no, to t......retla}arboli;,:.pro- • alDavI31D11: to tis .^ertnnersrt_and lrrtreale tic OW.;.rxt><c to Erol• • • y>'ak 3rxsrta - HIGH R.g.nole,svits ektp wrc Cnnr isslan [VAL.',ta2.rtsrn pn Lices lmeel el aaitnlut • E.0.DMslpn: rbl•i,tin apttxosana ai.u.at<•aysa.v.etticdx Cear+•mK •• • •• t..it>/cs4erx 2030 HIGH aGemlikko*Ib5t'rkv.v. LRF",,,,p+'- g CPA-201 9-0006 — Annexation Policies Create annexation policies N Criteria for processing s • ID land use designations a , • Analyze fiscal impacts - _ p �o=�,.. fid � ��,� �.� 9 } wkA 1 C It ril 1 iiii . mem , .. . CPA-2019-0008 . New map Appendix Create 11 "xl 7" maps • Easier to read and copy _." Appendix 11 Figure 16.Future Land Use ___."--N, ,1...-ro.P.r.• • • r_-. . . • • I ---E___ .. . •' . • • ' .. - wed Ws ▪ Assist in public records . : .._.. ) ..„___L___........_ _ -_-----_, . P.Ptickparx•rpd Ant, -•-••"----- ' --- ..----- --•-•-,- - - • ._ _. --- Lr4 tka 0.444,4., — 1 .,-._. _ .:it ,,T- '-"- •11,.. --:-----___:.--..„-' ..: ...:.,,_ _---) 1 ....._ __. ' ' ' - _ t . L. . 1 13 I 'I -air on _..... .. ..... 0 , _______ , •i•4. I;.• 1111 n•-•••-- .., -41L44CO`•• . II 4'•I • .• . 4.-"'Ir I -- • Sookan... .. -- ..mr-r"--4,f.-..:• ------,,-: .-,--,- - .....r---...kilk. ..71-MINKLA 11-1••••‘101.111!,L". . • '-,r- a 4111 - , . ,...,.. —.A, i _------ . rirttellt 'CI,:2:re---r • • --- :- ( . :-. Lik' p ,.. . , ',,J.=--- ''.• . 4 ' -1- -L.J.' \' ,,,,.. \n' ..MIW•••-L.3r• --"" 'br- " .`..-.'-... .`-''1.. .a..i j •••, • .,---• . • !. 1 . '1' r-----r • - . . • p. L•-• '1%. p ,..,.., . 0 ,----„...4f--•••.." o - 1 - ! r.. .Vrarrox, • F-•-' . . I III 1,14.4,4(1/4215,444•1440-4.3.4,...•411.,Fl.,,414,..14 kw,-e.4-te,...........-at.l.....,...'.,,.....•••.•IIII,•I,‘I-I. ,... SI 1 • a.s.,•••••....,..ror,re•414..,1144...411,44.5 W.,Kr-1....,'MTV ,41.1,414,4,41•4•4,4'4..•4•4,,,.I4.4...,I.•4.1., • CPA-2019_0005 — Transportation Ch . 5 / 7E. _ 1 _ ry.---b -• 4441614 ...— Purpose: r"----- 1 — W. y.-0011 0 c, I Zg 1 1 — - 1474)P**6**4*V.4.4 1, :: .4,.Z.taltilg011_ 11•110 01.141 0, E b.,... A,,,i *1' 11 • r 1..."`' • Update Transportation _ _ __ .. -__ Element _ F T -- i. 100110,1,1 : .. / I •—•-•. '....41111.1 AN T ze '" E - 0,1 : i 11 .---1--'--•,_,, i -.'4."1,11111.1011i llllll _ - I 0 z • Focus on pedestrian and .41101B lllllll 1 1/14. Z—___ gil lllll 111 1111 i -., I ' I i — --.1— — ••=i=r!J.L.N..44 4.nr FA... CA I / b 1.1.0,•.. Ilk A '1.- , -11----17 .... . 01111 AppiewayTraili bicycle components L III F Ian. 0 1 Li—T Dishman Hills . Connect pathway network Existing&Pmposed ... W. 11 11 ••• MIMICZWI BL.1111Cligieg 0 0417. I • Add policy language to ---1_ _..,. .,..„.„,,C,V,P,4 L0 Z Z BiKews,e E lenTrn(4 g ....b';'''.I. t •r1 . support Complete Streets ., ...I0'4141'0.1 ex...,EfIqg 0 44 4 id 0 so= n10010.4 - -- Transportation Ch . 5 CPA-201 • Which improvements are most critical for addressing Public involvement: transportation safety? • Online survey • Public tabling 0 • In-person survey 0 o Iv a. P, 0-ipsyf4 7.- -E _v c =- TIS ate�a ,, Farr4111"7a q ' e. ° y E m 0 a ,//y� aa V — _a o ,y / 3rd1►ro * 411;4C.J N? SIIIIP1Mil kr le._ 7 -c Ci. "a , O • moi, 9 Other IA Count �r� iE"��'o Havana 5�c e a:<s ■Uavemei.`_Lcrc ot't r. E. :-..aVS Street Cru irgs ■Speecng •6115 Stop ■Other CPA-201 005 Transportation Ch . Short trips citywide ] ) Technical Evaluation: , iren4 Rve • Housing and lob density i ` '' ' • /Crashes sio ▪ Co:::sit / 4101,. - aik 44.4' Aft Am, AO - __: . , • Public 11110 /1/7 NW Ila • Short Trips �_Lm,tjb L \\\,,, v 1 - , ,__1 I �� - 5 Mile Trips y — 1 Mile Trips 2MlileTnps _ JI `t_ /' r -74 Source: SRTC Nvuseharc!Travel Survey . , CPA-201 Transportation Ch . 5 Recommendations: ' ' . i a -- Complete trail connections `- "} Prioritize sidewalk projects • Prioritize bike ro acts - s' - IME- =11111iinii,iM IVil . M- I Streets `meq �. r�. � - • Consider Complete ` . ' ..■n.i --rte v I \ 1 . if- I1 i Example:Figure 26—Pedestrian Network CPA-2b1 '-0007 — Pedestrian/Bicycle ___ Append(13 ! Figure 27.61kewaY NetworkI Amend maps! _—s. � __ y{ • ai rigotri Fig• ure 26: Pedestrian Network ....._ .-::M,:�. , j r -___1 t .,+'..---' i ' 1...,...t:.-MI: T . : _. Fig▪ ure 27: Bikeway Network i � ,�, • III Figure 46: School Districts r- -- ..�- • �- - � � - L ,1 .k �� / .+ iriiw. • il :11 111111111111 • Example:Figure 27—Bikeway Network CPA-201 9_001 0 _ Twenty-year TIP 20-Year Transporlaymn Improvement Plan t.311201.1 Create20-year TI P T-:cot.-e-:;e :'et:..e 4 raldet a.c reett-e; r-*_ece.:t-stad c....z es I-Le d-,,c, Villehlilli Iftril . New appendix GMCIS Seasranon Proem T • .:,-.' :.!-:::::', ..--T-t:..: : X.:••:1-1::- . Consolidate transportation projects: ' • .. e X kliiatlattlUEDZSZWIELP-Millti, Comprehensive Plan -;4: :.4.-:-S e- -:.:.e--....- E '.-''.t::.'.:1:•.V--ff}-""'ei'.':" -.1: Traffic Studies I:!ear' ME years MEI Earte-i Ast a --enens- --t_t_r: -9,--_,:F5:--e;r:;:5-5 A'. -erle:::" •!-e.: --I:)on :::E-::::; • Informs 6-year TIP annually --:,:•,..-e".;,„+:. -„-..,.., siimiii.,E-:;•:-1T,I7 r.7-i::-T.--:3::..... INNI 7E: Ell M,'-3"1-4::•e;:o 7E: 7-1: -ersers%7 -:-...+-i.- BEINiiii11115§111 ▪ ...srse:':.- 7.1: Privately Initiated Map Amendment CPA-2019-0001 Karen Kendall, Planner . . - I 17,-,' ,*..--- fiji. P X01 9_000 1 7-- _7.1_ „V IIIM! MIR , ,.L. ,:o ,,= . =_— coe , ..‘, ‘ MI ;- C‘ -",: 1,..1 i'%.'l.J 1 .i=---._ �_ Applicant: • Ommr-- / Danny Davis _ . -- I a Owners. _ mw NM J Mobile Home LU . Park, LLCEll � ra Proposal: Change the land use a 6 lli • --�- W designation from Ito Project Site`0> I — SFR and the zoning - Efrom Ito R-3in G■..... Ji 11, L-.-..-lirilig mil"11111.1.111WImjillidilliellffill~1 2 zi;i:71-_.CPAI � f • P—2019-0001 simll ;;� Study Area lm tc t.t,,,,,,,,a,75.'C . —.- ' -'-'—' ‘IlliSs=!- -4.,,.— - ". " . :i.,,, ,,,.: .::mL -., ,:: :-. ,—,,iiit-l'"Iirli46411' 'It i kk . Cm IDisplaying . } •- x t 41E Surrounding uses :. j = CPA-2019-0001 4. ' 2e ; 110Pr. li:“':,11.1:: -e:I'; :::::. ,= Industrial ,,- e :i=ij A i{- ' t - 44 I lk . = Single family f 1, 4• It Ce 1 41 :ran...A.. r_ 41, I< ■ = Commercial r i ° Fil,4 i = Recent r r w permitting acti�ifiy _ •- "_ + - r' F. auekxa ,tic Study Area C I -- — c pA2 0 ii 9..0001 , 1 Ammoms LU > . eL Z "CC I SFR LU I Land Use LU Z , et Designations a- 44 = 1 ,,, CI- %, . = SF R V 1 NC itl_________ - Study Area NC pA 2 01 0001 _ I R-3 0 Zoning Districts = 1 0 = R-3 1 = NC Comparison of Development Standards Lot Maximums Density Minimum Setbacks Building Minimum Lot dwelling Front/Flanking Rear Side ZoneHeig ht Coverage Size /acre Yard Yard Yard R-3 35 ft. 50% 5,000 sqft 6 15 ft./20ft. 10 ft. 5 ft. 1* Unlimited N/A N/A N/A N/A 10 ft.* 10 ft.* * If abutting residential, development shall comply with Transitional Regulations CPA-2019-0001 . 1‘,.......„ E =r.-.4tlrr,iy �,•.- Parcel 3 i I Parcel 2 U , C LEGEND 0CPA-2019-0 01 •_ Proposed 1 • Transitional Regulations Buffer MINIIMIIIMI 0) ad Existing _ Parcel 5 LEGEND CPA-2619-000' �` ++ EI IX Adjacent parcels • Parcel 4 •� -; zoned R-3 Ci- 1111 C Transitional 0 Regulation Buffer g <- -.� '5•;.'0"11E-R ar.•=•Si iirlIMPPIIIII ...minimi , • i C PA-20 1 9-0001m , • •, , Study Area • '' 1,. . i 1 . • 1 , ---, - ,. , I -M17 F,.Bre qi dm.ay Av.:• -411•111P.r- ':'4L-1•: ! , ,0 •al, .410 -,,i,„„,._1..,.-.,,,,J., i • .. -` i — A 1 411101111141ill - 111, i' • -•,....... •- 10', 6) .1 44 Ilk.filt I I I •1 71_ ' .1 ...- . , . !i. ,,, ,, • ..-,*_ A6## ' is -11111.111 _..7. .,i,,..„. , ,,,,.„. • • : 0 ,1...ill'', ''.., ..'''. itli6: (1- • ' II7444,;,,,I•rifdPer . ; , . . .... dipfr t i ... —11111r"--7211111t -, . 4.., . # • . i = - .,. .. Q u E 5 T 1 0 N s . ,..... .. . _ . -- ,,._-; „ .., , ...,-,0:0,-*•:,. _ ,, _ ,., ,• _ ., , r *p ,400pirr, '-' ,. , 1, ' -.[. .rt r .. . , • ..... ._ !_::: .:.i,tipi,..rzi,: lc ,., 4 .P111 I, , :111EIL : r 0-.... 0".". 1 li I .( N • ice,LI , 414 It rj. • t'l --arm . 441"-ra ."1 1 °"4 ist":41t •.4 4i . (• r • ii r . - a.; ti . • - - . 1 - : • • "4,1, .1 ' ' ik ,p • 11. . , '', , f . . ....'''4 . ,:.•Loot ': •:' 1 .- ._ ...... . ..-_ - -- -Ai --=--=---• —I.-\A 1 t.!•1,wav ve...A...m. m.... - 'wow Privately Initiated Map Amendment CPA-2019-0002 Martin Palaniuk, PIcc7ner -„,_ , ,,, 1 , Li ] , , in -- [4,[,J ii -7 _J • - CPA-2019-0002 - " -5.,.- IV ,_ .. _ • 1 ____, , • T ' F M'*'Tr . d i - jrl ;r:' -`-/-11- 1. FIlLx �t�!_YApplicant: ':'� v Whipple Consulting _-- � �.■■ .: �y■ W Engineers ::': ' ILI Owners. Advent Lutheran Church i_ > TCF Properties, LLC — 1 r"TT1 , Ce L- -1 -=V , LU Proposal: Change the land use if*.K,w ' - - ti 2 — " ''01-c1 S #e 0 designation from S e v, ■ ■■, -1...-. IAN 1 NC and the zoning from �: ■ NM �ry_nnv� MI III El . allimer R-3 to NC ..,, j ._f__. mow _ __ ■i I� - 1"1""1 :__ ■■ � --1n I I - S 1 I foiti rr. PA-20 1 9-0002 *, t11rr,�,1 Area , 44 �(k JI . M1T 11. CL A16, ( urrounciing uses • �� trr Fe. ri}��14��4s. = CPA-2019-0002 • , trr �' ,, it 4 dor E] = Water District r ' p0111 SULLIVANekes offimistal 41k, = Single family f: - 41:11C = Schon, Church/ i, r Ili . .41 1 '11)16i °. * — r — 1,11i , BPA Easement ' *. 601 a,. • 1 CPA-20 9-0002 - -- .,c 'Study Area Land Use W Designations NC SFR Z d . LU * NC I "I Z I 4--- -- imillEMil ek O. —i SF FL 2 a_ 0 r ac*acv U 1 1 • -________ _ _,.. 1 a / \ \!study Area CPA-201 _ -- - -= Zoning Districts 1 = R-3 1 1 ••• CLQ NC L = NC 2 , 1,0 Z Z R-3 0 n �. l tStandards Comparison Lot Maximums Density Minimum Setbacks Building Minimum dwelling Front/Flanking Rear Side Zone Height Coverage Lot Size /acre Yard Yard Yard 000 R-3 35 ft. 50% 6 15 ft./20ft. 10 ft. 5 ft. sqft NC 35ft. N/A * * 15ft. 10 ft.^ 10 ft." * If residential development, comply with density & dimensional standards of adjacent residential zone. A If adjacent to residential use. ,.....jr. .... ...f..00 •L .r,„ _ .,,,elf, * _.-1E41 r 4 :I ;w k, .T1 C PA■� �■ ^ ;� � �Study Area X 0 1 0002 u fir6 ! Apr . R 4411 PrktFPNlrr kb . .1 I ../if, O F ,–,,.•, _ . If ""1: VC ... I" & .it - + `'p ;ISI�. , y �'e �, ,g •. . ' - .5103 A 4 illyi,' i i ? rIsii 4 SULL ANIF. s ! Ci tirtIF A.- x ti , QUESTIONS III �� i y1 lank, riga', . Ii k F ' -riL F r .,\ is - ‘.. b rit-11/2- . ii ithi c ti ' r ' 'I. . 1 . 7.4frj. r . • Sit 1 .A tiC-1--___.- lf:_\''. ?:.'.,1.1......: . ?..5: — 4 6 - t . r. 1!: . . , ".44at Tlit, ps, I•' • L 6 . 4 rif . p#. Privately Initiated Map Amendment CPA-2019-0003 Martin Palaniuk, Planner J ri., /.. H ' i ... i.,,: e„.......r- C PA-20 19-0003 , . . ill 1 1-14';I .,,- Uri III. Applicant: Joel Elgee I Elio II , ,.:.._..: _.. ;,.. la cffi . I III NE 7 , L ,,,, _ _ . rl Owners: Marguerite, LLC — LU its • Terry Ovstedal III Proposal: Change the land use 111111-1 . inli.i r ig •■ . • LU designation from SFR fiaiPTThim liumer 1911111111 > MM--":4 I 111 IN•iiiimeilill to MFR and the zoning row mill from R-3 to MFR I II MI :; PM '4 illi" :II1= lltIm wiz plum P. . ...714. 1-1 se•C-......,-1—... ..,.., 2 �.-C PA-2 0 1 9_000 3 . .... .Jw r F r • M .f Stud Area / c �+ *I 6urrounding uses . * . ■ = CPA-2019-0003 ' ' . .,tel ' Single family . _ 411C and two family - „;, -0. ., r r •r;° = ir" ' ' I toAr... ')44. . c , i _ ?..2- -Fl Commercial Ce ./' i:. .,e.:,F.'"` ' .., .,r.", <IC . ,-, - ...,,,,,,,, � I,l Y CPA-2019-0003 Study Area C` SFR MFR f Land Use DC Designations = MFR 0 = SFR V = RC C PA-2o 1 9_0003 , .■. , . 1 1,1 1 Study Area a R-3 x MF R0 Z Zoning Districts Z 111 = MFR 0 . _ NI = R-3 h - = RC Comparison of Development Standards Lot Maximums Density Minimum Setbacks Building Minimum Lot dwelling Front/Flanking Rear Side Zone Height Coverage /acre Size Yard Yard Yard R-3 35 ft. 50% 5,000 sqft 6 15 ft./2Oft. 10 ft. 5 ft. MFR* 50 ft. 60% 2,000 sqft 22 15 ft./ 2Oft. 10 ft. 5 ft. *Where MFR abuts R- 1 , R-2, or R-3 zones, development shall comply with Transitional Regulations • 11711-1i ----, .44,.... ...._. .... 1 CP A—20 1 9_0003 1.11 1 1,, , di 1,6 g q . - t ,_,_ _ lei, —... -1 117r ...r.. SOO r" "'" ... miliosimiiimmiiii=jaw_.#4="illaiii" -L.--;:-.4 M. , II ' — ` 1 r:'II ii i 1111) 111 g ' ' rid! •,1; Study Area 4 id 1, • , . ,44.. . n, ir i *"' .--•-••-- i. lb, , QUESTIONS , . or= —.... .,.. .-„ . -L ._ , IF , __ ? 1 - 6.14-Ltkir Ai •. ... Vi .... , .... !LAI . . ;-..-• - 7- 1, :- i , . , , --‘r":"•7,fr!' it"• I • ' - 4:4* 91 1 3 i, ,... , ,,.. • ._ ... . . ir , ,. ., _, .... . • . -r . •'" . , . . a a... , gial _ g i : I . .- -1 i N'10 ' •'- 1 - — 1 ._ii••• •• .11, g ,.le r 1 , .1 .4 . ,.! 1 1,, ii • •114 ..: 1, --- I i -- , • 4 -,,,, i ... ' . --- NE, , I 4 Z. AV 4 tr .4. 4 10.- s•--or • -- - --- i iii 11--- .. ii, i, - r It EN. City Initiated Map Amendment CPA-2019-0009 Karen Kendall, Planner CPA ,20 1 ,?„_, -f =__:_:_:_:___- . LI • , _I Applicant: City of Spokane Valley F T —___L____ _ Pro ect 5't r._=---- __ Owners: Carlson, Janson, Kjos, - , ill in Masson On the Rock We ! ,t - W Stand, LLC, Consolidated . : Irr. Dist 1l Henderson "'' 1 — Tif—Tr—r- -- ce Legacy, LLC and Whimsical } F ,i LU Pig LTD Part. = I _, a ' iRt --nom _ - r me. 0 Proposal: Change the land use =- ■1111111111 designation and zoning 1L ._1_ i r 1 ' ��ta from MFR to CMU '11d ' 111 7 1 MUM din: - II I _Ill - mi m I < t: -- II H CPA-201 -0006 .„_,,,._._._.__._. _ .,_ f I. ' ' ' ' I \"I ." 1164k ' " 4 7_, - - 1 ,... PaAtt, , . .„ .,=mkt I. IF‘4' Ilik ,, k xt 411%01°L- i . , . „4,441. _ if,' • yij'�MJ"(� '� ''J•b'�� 'M�� _'y,. �n.,r6 } , I �r1 11141( xriii:r .. r - 44 t . av z ter,.OS-,__ \0:. -r . 1. • ' /' N" - ! t * . • • \ A e .; r . ‘ti.a' , , fir ..r., . ,. . .,. . i - 10 , -. II : 11, , ' , ',L. :4' k ,:l'‘)Ilk', 4', 10' *r - ;I •4,141 7:' a . ,, ''# 1 .., 11,;) ict 4 y1r i- j _��.�A X1'\4 -. 01 i. —!7 : - r 'lir 1„ pi"' Jol,:,i_ 1 l' r'. . ''' 114 - ,. ,s ir. -, ,, , .... r.. « i„ , _ IIFFHil n,,,...., _ 1, ..„.....„,.....„ C 1- ". . . . :t,4� t . a: _- .[ ; f AO BPA Easement • CPA-2019-0009 9_0009 ,„.10.1„. ..__ __ c)-7)0 L.,,,f)c.n..„....-------------------„,m .ilim„____________________ 1:Ni,ia A‘e r K 44:1 Study ►reap , 45104.9151 V) 13107 E Z414�I 1 — MISSION AV W45104.0 45104.0323 I • )ADDRESS 0 VACANT �W Z 45104.0329 a CL rir •CRESS 4 OWN ' apN2 MR --- ....... — aitam+s sKr 51a1i - --, 45'104.0330 t lrIT3$15eSION YE i3519 13621 E LI) I HissFomAve MISSION AVE MFR S R ". .I C PA-20 1 9-0009 _______ _. . .... iimir---------- I:Itiara.1e lo k;9j(}4-}:krn _.__ - •- _ —7 — - Study Area; Om 1 'CC . 45104.9151 13107 E MISSION AV1. `""" 45104,U328S 0 405 04.0323 0SVACANT j � OADDRELANC7 J -1 45104.0329 Z KESS OWN 0 , 43104.D315 "'"" 4504131145104.03301 ,s:1s'c E 13621 E 415:154 A'fE MISSION93519LE s �� MISSION AVE . I MFR 7LIi R-3 Comparison of Development Standards Lot Maximums Density Minimum Setbacks Building Minimum Lot dwelling Front/Flanking Rear Side Zone Height Coverage g Size /acre Yard Yard Yard MFR 50 ft. 60% 2,000 sqft 22 15 ft./ 20ft. 10 ft. 5 ft. No CMU N/A N/A N/A * N/A N/A N/A limit *Single family residential shall comply with the density and development standards of the MFR zone. CPA-201 9-00„7 _ . .----, ,-;:11 F n'r t Study Area �c�r,�, " , Ili ‘111.-)1741 ,k• \L.',,"' . lit litti: kiliv , ,ilk.1 4,..v.z.._I. _...,.,_,:::: ;, 1,77::: 1,.[, .irr....„......-..„. , - - _,,. , rilirliF,�FiA• i J , " .J""'.`' f..ra k�•Ji ' r'.';a� . - _1.. x 1 ,,. � �i ,1.:- _...+�,.� - _y J 1 �J �f' y r 1 •�.al'y' r _lr : i . : . .. Q U ESTI0NS P x� � _ '4„,-.7.: .:7.......,H1_:-:_ --7-:_..- .7.,.': -._,,,.,.. -1.:, .. „...4. . .„- ., + {.„ � ., ir .. '' ",„1,1 ..-Naa- '1r .. ;11 .71', , _ 4. , . ..; .:(„iti, , 1 4,4.-,,,, v. _ , - ori . ,.,.:. I, % . , W 16M rtj 17;;;;;;:TZ I r- T r' '70'i;i)' ` SSSM7 ,M 1A,641t1141 tf %. ,. err „, . - 14 r • _ ti t itiv..tli it I i. _..,: , . - . ..,-, .,, . .1,,.. rt'�+_ iui? ; r r r .', !1 1 �"r` 11 €x-'_ NEXT Steps - Amendment Process • October 31 , 2018 deadline for applications (60- day notice) Docket • Admin Report — Discuss Process and Introduce Docket — 1ov. 18, 2018 • City Council takes action on official docket — Nov: 20, 2018 • Public Noticin• — •ublishin a • t� • •ostin• on site for Site Specific CPA's •° • nin• Commission Study S.ess on Feb 14, 2019 c N • Public Hearing -- Feb 28, 201 9 deliberations and Recommenda Torus oMar. 1 , 2019 • Administrative Report 'c • First Reading u8 • Second Rea d ing Comprehensive Plan Amendments NEXT STEPS SOlikane jValley 2019 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendments Planning Commission Public Hearing February 28, 2019 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Process 0 •_ . ,,, .o Z5 C •V 'E Study Session Administrative �r- .� �7 _ _ 2 -3 cp 2-7 4-]9 .F3 Report CL 3 } E •c d 'c Public Hearing V Ordinance 7 St •u E Q E 0 0 O 2-28-19 7• Reading a c c 0 o 'C Findings of Fact U Ordinance 2"d Cl— QLI-1 0 3-7 4-19 Reading F ! f NV V Today Comprehensive Plan Amendment Process SVMC 17.80. 140 Staff Role Planning City Council • Facilitate Process Commission • Legislative • Conducts Review • Conducts Public Decision and Analysis Hearing • Considers Public • Prepares • Deliberates and Comment Reports and Makes • Discretion to public notices Recommendation approve, modify, to Council or deny requests Notice ofPublic Hearing ----- „aciwpw-- , ii, c ,.. .r1 r..ti 91A 4r kA.NAr,,,\NA, 11 D Published in paper -" �;- , �\\\ „ ,� p �.t� k. pan*\ wits, .,,,..,,,\,%.*A.0,./..* 4,-,fr.- ,— \:,,,,,,,,,, .,,,\E 1 -30- 19 .1 mitlIcre,/,4%,,,,;;AV/Ap op,, WWI.=Igt4re;Acfr d I AfA \\ ger•;N11N11E1= \� i'co a frA.•/,',rvp/,AAiMmkN\ `. L—IPosted 1 -30- 1 :��a„ �,. ll ...\\ a/6,d ,'Z'7Fil. re/ • 1 ''M immusivi 1 Mailed 1 - 30- 19 �•�'�, ":„4:d7,/,./01,4,4,""f:2"/..'"‘„\k,,,,,,\,;1 `%f/Vii? ,i +!rN,``,:\ \w ti 11 , , , Extended noticing from 400 \\\\ , ,? ,\ feet radius to 800 feet. t \\ a Legend II � IlL .f � Site APwart Darter .�ti soon buffer i i nMaterials Plannin ssoomr� -----min. Yellow Binder - cityoAn u 1�p°.ane t'�7//ey Li Application Materials A dit-lonal .� �. , Ar�ren� ents mprebensivePfan El Staff Report I. ; � � ,, • ❑ • - Received ❑ Agency Comments , • Public Comments ❑ Maps �. [1, - is Y il o Any other related documents - "''YI�:lIM ' \:i I i., l= Approval Criteria -- Staff Report Analysis Required Findings other Considerations ❑ Supports public health, safety ❑ Effect on Environment welfare, and protects the ❑ Compatibility and impact on environment existing uses and neighborhoods hborhoods ❑ Consistent with GMA and ❑ Adequacy and impact on Comprehensive Plan services ❑ Responds to a change in ❑ Benefit to City and Region conditions ❑ Quantity, Location and Demand ❑ Corrects an error for land ❑ Addresses a deficiency ❑ Projected population for area ❑ Other effects on Comp. Plan City Initiated Text Amendments CPA-2019-0004 , 0006, and 0008 CPA-201 9-0004 _ strategies Amend Strategies Chapter 5trategiesforlmplementativn The strategies included on the previous pages are compiled here for reference. te_nd Far eat:h stratetev.the implementation matrix provided below also exdrores • Removed Comp1eted the relationship bete pen each strategy and the various elements of the •Comprehensive Plan.designates!earl staff or organization for implementation f '- activities.outlines a time table fOr completion-and provides a rough sense of • i-.i-i_tci;, itii_,-. relative priority.Though the strategies are not naandatory for the City.their are Update timelines • II icir. • an Important window into Spokane Valley's approach.to ttte implementation of the Comprehensive Plan am they merit continued evaluation by City s±aft. • a�.t,, F 1.:1, • • • • • I-�'bliCt.C.-:.r.,:. .I1[.Ir.7, • Modify with new information • .1.5 .(lo:r., o _:;5 • Platurnl F;Cso_n .s ▪ Develop new PRIMARY STRATEGY ELEMEN RELATED ELEMENTlS) PA"AfNERS TIMING PRIORITY 11 ocr cite"acurntrercrc!ctra a"I dr..,la awls.and nwkel an Identity Fee O♦in4ane Vann • :hal setmtncG�lvse+l.ar,rn;,,,.,et:te•rpurduF Cronorn,c • • ae Division.'i 2017 HIGH rc deity.amp,cma,mu as:lc: Dert-locrcn Continue narlKbat.on mrab'.wnar trnnram'pra• • Ell ulHaten; otionotf rta anwcr d ataw Ow Cr 's nrewn“in Ecarcmic • • 'y„'�`•L m . - HIGH Sports mdienal t,er4; Dnoriapr'cnt Cammiaton Eyatuatr the eelMm On irntettrnenl n!noienlial • lrurism anchor:and Allocate ivaaaNefunds Ccvrema •• • 5• v Opo..bblne 2g1 a HIGH aoso.dlnt to the brdinp J i!Spaka e oc-re+nW+tchl CPA-201 9-�� — Annexation Policies Create annexation policies ,-,--7 ti l • Criteria for processing - ____ • ID land use designations r p • Analyze fiscal impacts _ _ r 7 . ilib L 4111 -Nr 21'. - f CPA-2019-0008 — New map Appendix Create 11 "x17" maps • Easier to read and copy . , Appendix B • : .,...... Figu,re 16-Future Land Use ,..i: _ ,-`• i OK,It Cur* in public . _ lawi Lin • Assist records . .. .. P . , 1,n,incr...1 flantl.•,.. : --..----=,- 1. + _ _.-- •. __ .__ ..•-. --....-, r.-,--..-.P-h-.-....1-- -- _ . • ..7..4.4_.-•-•., .-..-•' .. ....'3- ...\-, ..-- --- - - . .: r . _ ---- ___...._ 'V .• a ..er il ---- A...—.:_-.. MU. 1 ..,. -,-- i .._--- '.=1: "1---—- ;-' 11.111 .VMErai aminilIal ann.i 11.1.0'••••1".!:.L. _ et"50 11_,, _ - rillir . '. • MI 11/7....,_„1„,j_ ' 1 .0,00 Valley . . , .-- ;,-, • , by- '' ''''- '--•'-:• Z'''—: \ \ a I . , ' .-.T. . - 'I • ..-1 '... r 6 .ini?___EM47 ..- 1 . • - I 1 - ad INDOM Nweraimog . . •. , ' • _ ! I . .' " ....0 . , i ......5.m el r6rIXT.5....i..V...........r,arc R.V.r••••,. .-^....r; li :I-'.7;f.!';•=,:r...'"'s•tt.'""'"'''..-'''7,Z'ttr Staff, Agency & Public Comment Staff & Agency Comments Public Comment ❑ No Agency ❑ No public comments comments received received • PA-20 19- 12 Strategies for I mpf eme n tat i on L. 1111111 .„. .mak. . . . Srw•.r.Yu.ie lw•r..r.w.Me+.4,+, • • 1•. _ Via.- PUBLIC nv..slc ,u.m+, u.lou...c.r. .w.<h rw..c n -'Y —• — p F III i lb I COMMENT • Iwnurwn..,— (please come to podium) .tit .. ,� ... r City Initiated Text/Map Amendments CPA-2019-0005 ,0007 and 0010 Colin Quinn-Hurst, Senior Planner CPA-2019-0005 . Transportation Ch . 5 .., .., ,. .., , ...,_ ., , : . . Update Transportation ------ _ .„,,,,...„ 0.....c. __, ,.. . , ..1 i . •-e,.., : .— fah.fixat 041,,....,"j "417;<„,.. . • Element• ,---- ! _i____ ,-9•. ...... : • Nr.1.:, t --, • _:'- . — .1 ,.. i IL : A ...I... ... i . 21 E Kamen eare ,r,ae—iplYeae 11-- 4---.. .--- - 1. Focus on pedestrian and k,. .: i , i ; , • i • ,a.,,,,..„.... ; ' -qv 6 lllll - --i--; , .1_ _1 bicycle components 011111111111111 lit, 14 4 I rt I —1 E. '4- ¢. •'''"- V X elen t '•-N.n.,.....4 ' bailaii44.0 ,iiM=1 iii,,,, 1 ett1 tl. . .. Ell Appleway Trail —1 kelfnak. 'C I*Pin 1 1 1 -----. • Connect pathway network __, ', L1„ i I .c. I p.JDishman Hills 1 ; Z \ • °,1 1 - ; ve Existing&Proposed • Add policy language to 1.z. Ineaway listisert 1 1 Munictpal Boundaiies E MI Awn ti e E Men!eaa support Complete Streets , i 1 .'7.1 ar...,'e -..V:' ,9.,.1- g,L.Pc.:,.ar:.:...t•SLazc Z 4..,„ r 1 Prewar Ver.ems 7 i 'or 1 • h.1.1, 4- .. •' Pt. 1 g moo D a...._P. :•• : . E ...a. €1.Are : ea il \ Ilmn= 11110 CPA-201 9 �� Transportation- — Ch . 5 Public involvement: Which improvements are most critical for addressing transportation safety? ,o • Online survey 120 • Public tabling . ,pc .441 • In-person survey 0 3 a T.; Et' i VJ to C a°` c,, N V) V0 yq : �` Farr '% be VI). qi,-4,4,'& o E m 3 c Y4 7, CD..-:-'-'3,z4ge sIrtA0 4 0 1.0 ,,_, . _o bi 0,, ia ,c4 , - *ht/"..,* *T.* ' :ftl' , . -, .74,,,,,,, p.,._ v 1 20 . cr_ il L i w -- 4 � E Other v.146 �� , fe 6 tout �� 's y'46 AO 'der e Q r# Havana ■Sidewalks ■Pavement Conditions Bikeways Street Crossings •Spee ding i Bus Stops a ether PA-2019-0005 — Transportation Ch . 5 Short trips citywide Technical Evaluation: i. YQ < ,--.., \ • Housing and job density 7- , _ L, __, __:...›. / • Crashes - ft(f - ,, ii, , = • Congestion - l A AI • Public transit , � I►t0 '1 1 �i 11111,, 14110 - ---lit-' jN , . I • Short Trips >__ s . _ r f - 5 Mile Trips - 1 P.lile Trips ! y. I 2 Mile Trips _ {�F` i source: SRTC Household Travel Survey CPA-2019-0007 — Pedestrian/Bicycle Maps Amend maps: l- - nwo--=.,, _ ittiE.-= - • Figure 26: Pedestrian Network _� � R - • Figure 27: Bikeway Network t ti L - __ . ��_ �i . Jul U N. _ • Figure 46: School DistrictsfiriffillMitailrili IL,- -a-■� 7 - is g! sire rmt J %,, a _ V1 Example: Figure 26—Pedestrian Network CPA-201 9-001 0 — Twenty-year TIP 20-Year Transportation Improvement Plan s.as,n111 Create 20-year -rip T-3 coc.rre-s,C2-: ,e.;a-;c=CC a-e pote-ea ..r:*tC":.:In.t.i D.:.:CC a,,e 6,-•ea-TP - 1,011.2 8.2124111.0 Pl0g1 Tiro Qat imeiramir rum • Nevi appendix Graala 3 paragon Protects. :: .7.srat: a:.-e:V.:, :•'-30e Z"25 e.:P Cp.:; I: :i:::::: --I:)21-1 ::::-::::5 :f.:3r32:0, • Conso1.date transportation projects: - . ' r „,,„„„ i In Isrorerion imam romans Prpsiel • Comprehensive Plan ,-t:-... .:=:-, ,:. ....-„,:-MZ6ZGt•l ::...73 s 212C::: --1: -i--,i1--:' -:-zr.e^•,.-'. , raffic :' .ss.-l.s::ra aPa..,.sa . , 7-- 2.- .- 7-?: • TStudies '235 :::1-.:::;• 3•12 1 a:7 -'2-, ' a7.,1t-t,.::E.a.r•:--esee-1 2 6-yearTIPannually E - 2 :- T5 -::i,ave;o:e:5- a., ..7.r..3-Je..2:"-:2"- TBg'::4 ..I:))i33I'S5 ::! . Informs es A:a-I:Z.:: ^7irs:+:-.:, ^•+.-1.•&:::- ::-:za rta-xst v•a,see-:.-taes--. _:7.i,...... -es --I:y231 :::5.- ::, -- , I.k;;;,.2,‘Pa A:.:'7-,,,P 5,,,,C^trZ:1,,::r-3 -2-127:- 7.E.: --1:12.311 ::::.!..-::.:i ;:'••=,.: -:-.•2-2-' €-i -i'..i.:: -re: -.1: -:r:•+-+" -zi-s•4.-^e•-•: Staff, Agency & Public Comment Staff & Agency Comments Public Comment ❑ City's Public Works ❑ No public comments ❑ Spokane Valley Fire received CPA-20 19-0005 , 00070010 0 20 Appendix B Figure 27.Bikeway 744twe rk :seem.Nra :3111 Num,Nam* C y, c' PUBLIC G _N Erre >e---- , ._r_t �. ..11. :'. 1iirrieliiiii .•.... n...", • '-..- __-..........f.,..........'.._. ..... , mil Rail - . COMMENT .... k —rooms Nil � 1r" ley (please come to podium) , , I Example:Figure 27-Bikeway Network Privately Initiated Map Amendment CPA-2019-0001 Karen Kendall, Planner - F7-- -- „--. PA-201 9-000177, v A,:iil ... 9 �y.+'R =`fG — FaMI F:_'-dpi FR 4� Fr,ol Applicant: -�■T �- pp Danny Davis �� rI Y ■r■. - ME �x ,�y:., _ �i-ter Owners: Circle J Mobile Home z ■i17 W Park, LLC • w onr miii >ce Proposal: Change the land use . Ill designation from I to '_ P ojecSite 0 SFR and the zoning from I to R-3 �.Ay� .; r^� p • ,4_ .. IlilibmomElp ■ " 1 ��` `�, StudyArea c PA_2 0 19-0001 " r ..wpm -1IFMEI mu-j . - �e-r --- - - r '5 %..IU I.1.: -1 k. %i __� . " Displayingl' °4( Surrounding uses 2 = CPA-2019-0001 Iy hill d -. tvi ]gyp ;yyY .1)1; ]. � ,1%1^'9 ; ./y 972)4, 4-, 111 = Industrialti A ; 1 °4C , . . Ill iLi .- = Single family r---": ' '-,1 .11, , , I lit -. ' ,Jr-i mil . _ d .r- I / LU 0 = Commercial . < . i Recent permitting activity F - - . 11 I Study Area CPA-201 9- , Nc _, ,,. , ,,,1 i I _ W › _, z < I SFR W Land Use W Z et Designations !. Q * .1 = 1 I 0 = SFR U = NC Study Area _1'I}f I' NC CPA-2019-0001 1 . r_ _ Q R-3 0 Zoning Districts = 1 1 0 R-3 = NC r V 1--•:,,tip r Comparison of Development Standards Lot Maximums Density Minimum Setbacks Building �Vera a Minimum Lot dwelling Front/Flanking Rear Side �`ZHeight g Size /acre Yard Yard Yard 1* Unlimited N/A N/A N/A N/A 10 ft.* 10 ft.* R-3 35 ft. 50% 5,000 sqft 6 15 ft./20ft. 10 ft. 5 ft. * If abutting residential, development shall comply with Transitional Regulations CPA-201 9-000 1 1 ,. 1 i L_I E rrnadway Ave E nraadii.ry .4:ve• mi _AN dN f �+�• �, . P CcjsPane{1 "V*tita)1 C 1' Parcell 44,,,e Existing ,Proposed LEGEND 0 CPA-2019-0001 _ Parcel 3 1.7 ce ix Transitional I • Regulation Buffer d 2 Parcel 4 Affected Parcels Staff, Agency & Pubik. L, ]i'tm1.sEVnJ Staff & Agency Comments Public Comment o City's Public Works ❑ Comments received o Spokane Valley Fire Included in Planning o Ecology Packet o Yellowstone Pipeline I .. . . _ _„_._ _ ,. 1,,__,. 131,- „...a. ..... . . • ,., ' -4 - _ orwarlr -.-4,• . "rail WM 1 Ir I'-- C PA_201 9.0001 ,. ,.:,. , , . , . Study Area ._ .1_10' - I •..- , . , - Osir411 • „ - . riga •7 ' ,' ' ." -7.---mr ., i -1:-_,N F-, ,.• - • i i 1 4111.:* 29 1 r -. ' '77g-'0,_ •" -.E.--Eir-oLt&k.av ...L: • . ._ .. _ .....— - - ., . --. c• 1 -4 '-'.1,rik'-7 !,if:,L:i"rt4,1' li,-., -ref_,, _,‘-:. .5.-.- i,_ , • 'MI! " -)77., 4 ' .... 1-.4ii,- if.: ,,„ •Ipe-.0 ,70_•-t,,,,:' , ., ht• - 1 i:,:::,•'1.-• _,. A. -,•.• .. _• 1•, ,, T • ,1 11.riC,',1 ' , , . . . ' . ,-,- .. • r . . •.,, .....1 i,-_:.-.. - ... -, , - k-r.•• S' PuBLIc ____ ....c .,• . ,,... _ . .:.• r i.., `Aillo„ C ' . ir _ N,..,.. . , . ' 'i ,r • .1' ... i ii. ,:j '1 t-T' . • - 1, 1 1$1:t . . 0 4: ' • ,-.-' •.:"i- COMMENT 11 c•:- . '-gt4 „ qf- COMMENT ... . . . . _ .0 .,.. . i ?I _ l', 1 . .*. it tl - , •:,(' • ' '' I' .. . , 1 . .... .1 , oi ,. (please come to podium) _ . . • , - . . - ,. ., I; fr144-1:41:' • ..., •1 . • 1. -•. • - - .,. P . r FA-%--,r - .i.,, .. - . • .1. --...t- • r .- '"•'' 1 ..,,, .. J.jim 1 i , • .....-- . It - , ..". . , _ _ 74 1 .:...- . , _ _ -F.-':al 1.:•.--,A.ay7tIvt- _ - • Privately Initiated Map Amendment CPA-2019-0002 Marlin Palaniuk, Planner :d I N I I I I all 1111 rLLI L_ I 1 ,ItiI CPA-2019-0002 f E1! 00j, ,.•,.111' , ..- *1 rags ,' 4 n!! i v • 9.7, ,,...,7 ; I- r- Z. 17 ,g,,:'ii . \ .'' it' • ' r71 a /, , ,f, til, .:.-t: .. .„ ...... , 1 .. kt •,, , .11!. , . ,. , - — . ,. 10 _ — r CPA-201 9_0002 lorio_ tudy Area c,,,, ?!-I• . .,, :44. c.,,,,,,, I 4" ‘7117P 0 r"r -...:' • ..,„...„:14........_-.-.....-,07:: • , .T - -- -- - aipplri prl 00 . _ surrounding use-.s. 41). 0 ' II ''' r. • ,,, • , 0 I ... ', ''. •' '4 : ''''.'1' i I 0 * . = CPA-2019-0002f..,,,,, 144.1100.. . ,?„ . 'i !, , ,...,..„...„ . , • . ,. '7 040 : itit:111. 14tY.!,0, IA,re, ; -'..17 11,'., ;,'' 1111 111114 t Pre .. 001 . .,,',ir,5",iLltalal ' • I l• '., t ,„ itt V.'',••• :r..,.r2;'"1.,49111011 1 _ . _ 1 ,. er,t...W014111,1.11111 II = Water District 1 i —OA 0 ' I ':' •' . _ . Ce I -= Single family .1174::,. .-2,-.....,., 16 L , . LU i.....111[—is. th, !hal.,r..,, , ,... . IIIICI( 1:=1 = School / Church - wiliCli. ., iliiiii 'fi '' ' ti ' 1 - _-.........4"... VA = BPA Easement C 11 :157: ,ryr* :i . i• Apia" _... 7 r '.... \........4515 . f.k •A,, e• 14. A • ../.0,• 1 , \ , i___ / CPA-201 9-000 — — „study Area I Land Use W Designations NC > , CL = SFR iti)Z ail I 1.1.E [ = NC 1 Wz Icea0:( * ...1 5F 1 _ 10 E:f M L • CPA-201 9 'Study Area Zoning Districts = R-3 an NC = NC 0 z R-3 0 1 _ i 1 Comparison of Development Standards Lot Maximums Density Minimum Setbacks Building Minimum dwelling Front/Flanking Rear Side Zone Height Lot Size /acre Coverage Yard Yard Yard 35 ft. 50% 5,000 6 15 ft. R-3 /20ft. 10 ft. 5 ft. sqft NC 35ft. N/A * * 1 5ft. 10 ft." 10 ft." If residential development, comply with density & dimensional standards of adjacent residential zone. A If adjacent to residential use. Staff, Agency & Public Comment Staff & Agency Comments Public Comment ❑ City's Public Works ❑ No comments received ❑ Spokane Valley Fire ❑ Ecology _ Pti .,.. g le ., • W-Tt '4`4....• .7 ,, . . . / . . . . .4 Study Area ._.,pAm2 0 1 9_0002 .i 41 A4 . ,. 0 %1 [ - I di\ RktrftiltPrrt , • : • .ii-ii Alan F . a.: - 1 t, • _ . . -• . - 7111L .-..., ,,.. _ ,•:-_ ,.„. !,_ i 1r r__. I 411 k 11 PUBLIC •ilit-'-:. t '- ... 1 ,,. .,:,i,..„...„ , ., _• , 4 sIkr ti7or , , : Ili. ItetirliF - Mr .i.0 •a . k ..... • COMMENT . • , iii: I ' , .-,, r ., -•,._ _ . . •. _ . . _ , , . .' ' .. ki•ot -- — • • (please -5-,-..----T--___„--- come to podium) I ‘.-P, •±1 lal.,:_ . A -,. 1. 15:, Mt A ' I, 1 ._ 4' W .......A111.0.... la, ' I! FI .,--.sd, ,,,, rir ' I. Nr•WI7 ,. ; e.Pi: • . - ti - !. Privately Initiated Map Amendment CPA-2019-0003 Martin Palaniuk, Planner In N. -M �a =Et90 CPA-2019-0003 1111111# T- I l!'' r- .1986 fi 2 y "-1-:-. 191(.291 OCFRxnp ':------ -IIII IM - Ill Applicant: 11.1. 11.Pp Joel ElgeeEldi.s,anAv n, _ii n' Owners: IL/4 1 ill ilm - Marguerite, LLC — m Am LU Terry Ovstedal 1I III 2 1 [ 11-, a Proposal: the land use 111■1 � amL14111 ' _� Change � fir ,r_=M.�_Y�: 1 � designation from SFR R j ,■ �■ _;-. > liii 1111[:= IIIiiEI T to MFR and the zoning --- 0 III la.from R-3 to MFR Ci-ii-: s 0-- -En _ iIII•• =II 111 , CPA-201 9- 1{Vr ., - . ' sr' it 1 4 `° ''+ , ,i ' !`' y, p is '-1 1 ''' VI r, . ,, 1 i1R4 sPI , � � �Y,� v. - ,, Study Area .i.4,,I. ,r 1 - . surrounding uses`` fi rr 1 ' 1114 II al...1.,,! , ! , L jt 111 14: rcy yY JJ ' * . M _ �' by '; � I + ',I'll .:.�1 = CPA-2019-0003 p'�', 4. r `+ r�; "�i 4.•fir p, r�;IF �y_ Ii il = Single family �', . 44.' �,; ,if ,_.�.. , '�1>. " e. . — and two family ",;,'"y ,,ri! a -- , .�, :#2: , i a ' , lik, - Ce . = Commercial111111 w � t ,� ,►. �! °.�r1�` '� < ; LLI \......_ _....) . ,., ' ., 1114 , .„,16'. ° , '' A ittlg '.,,,,1\ v",:y _ 1.0 1 'ri :?:"";., W J ti �� I •OWL 1 -v. A r + w R' I fe" pp 1 ,;^ A .it �' ' �• .y ,11• 7 a ,1 19-0003 LU Study Area eL SFR W I . MFR = Land Use LLI ce Designations Q J ■ = MFR = SFR --- = RC CPA-2019-0003 Study Area Q R-3 MFR Zoning Districts = MFR = R-3 = RC i - p Comparison of Development Standards Lot Maximums Density Minimum Setbacks Building Minimum Lot i dwelling Front/Flanking Rear Side Zone Height Coverage g Size /acre Yard Yard Yard R-3 35 ft. 50% 5,000 sqft 6 15 ft./20ft. 10 ft. 5 ft. MFR* 50 ft. 60% 2,000 sqft 22 15 ft./ 20ft. 10 ft. 5 ft. *Where MFR abuts R-1 , R-2, or R-3 zones, development shall comply with Transitional Regulations Staff, Agency & Public Comment Staff & Agency Comments Public Comment ❑ City's Public Works ❑ No comments received ❑ Spokane Valley Fire o Ecology • • I�s ..C PA_2 0 1 9-0 00 : ' : : 1i '., , , , .. '�_ . ,I I i I_-. `_' Study Area }�. PUBLIC ,, ._ . ,,,,, . ., ;_. z. ,_ ,,,,,,_ ,. , . ... .. ,, ...., ,., _ ' ,.. ,,,,, _ __. ... . i _ „, 1 _ 11 i I l p =COMMENT . . �� -., ) - Ali•a I. r - . lo,t___, (please come to podium) . it - - , L ;11 _I 1 City Initiated Map Amendment CPA-2019-0009 Karen Kendall, Planner 1 _ CPA-2019-0009 — 1.Iii:ni_:4c. '.: — Applicant: City of Spokane Valley �- ---L__ Pro ect S t owners: Carlson, Janson, Kjos, , _``— Massong, On the Rock We LII Stand, LLC, Consolidated Irr. Dist., Henderson Eli Mall ----'-'-''----'''----- Ce Legacy, LLC and Whimsical _ : m �I sie- ILU Pig LTD Part. � .� _I:� j > r -U• ��L�� 0 Proposal: lirmliim_gliiiiip Change the land use � designation and zoning 11h1U1111h1hh1 jIl ;1��J1 from MFR to CMU iii - „III 1 .11 Er m. ■ E p CPA-201 �-�_ - - - . mei._ .... �- I,�,��•„—; Stud Area f9�, i4-, . _,id, . -J. If. S&L .• . - - 441: . L , J - . . '1 _' f3atil ,,, .rr;,r1 " ter' 2 4 ' iiiri!zi.,,' .\J t , ",, '...,,, --,47-7,01twatirtak' : .t_Ilmiffinvimr.,. frie .- -----„.t-_......... .0;41 . , ;7/11-(Y\ .1 oil.. , , _I 1 tk C '..' -. _ \4:114si.c.40. 44 A . • M. .4 . , * .bb, • \\ N614$. ' 4 , -7 ' ° '1 --er\ — - ' Is 14 ,N, 4 ** iet il 1,,r $ $ * II*AV• V ,-... 4 illi i 11114( )11116 R f r __AI= _. _ . _ ,r TIP;.1?.".'161....1 r : ,r.,,,,,,.... ,., ,. •,:- 7.------ -----.,, "" 'II'' '" :. 1.1,71.,41:i +�.+�,yr. _ .r` % r l �II 1 �. fr.lMrl • ,I Ior'.'�!•�r 1 - u rf P•i' • r a11��1.:it ))ri I _ 1114111C •• ille. , 1 • r 1 r' y L�tl'ell_ ;z _ e 1 ! ! r olorliiii r..... , I ,;Cr \; f w. ► - BPA Easement CPA-2019-0009 wimilma 171f111T L E Nora 1` — E " NO C}F 'Ramp 1 CM 6 Study Area] ---_ , 45144.9 i 51 LT1 in Ci. 1 1 Z — MISSION AVE, { 1 W 45104.0328 .45104.0323 T /ADDRESS 0 VACANT I "N '' LAND W Z Cl 45104.0325 1 m RESS OWN il %a , .. -niimigNIMMINIMMIIP-- 4slfla.wls 45105.0311 r'451 04.0330 --. 13515E 43519 E 13621 E ‘11) . YISSIONAVE MISSION AYE MISSION AVE CPA-2019-0009 E Nora Me E- 9°'E 90 O F kamp CM() Study Area Cm 45104.9151 * — 13197 E MISSIpN AV,.7-' 0 45104°0328 45194.0323 ADDRESS 0 VACANT ZOWN LAND — 45104.0329E KESS OWN 0 — 4`51042315 45101.0371 '--- 413620330 _,7_____ __ ` ' 1$515 e 13519 E --•.�—— 13621 E IlIS5i6X AVE MISSION AVE MISSION AVE _ I NI F R R-3 =.1,r�-,,1 _ _ 1 . Comparison of Development .Standards LotMaximums Density Minimum Setbacks Building Minimum Lot dwelling Front/Flanking Rear Side Zone Coverage Height Size /cicre Yard Yard Yard MFR 50 ft. 60% 2,000 sqft 22 15 ft./ 20ft. 10 ft. 5 ft. CMU N/A N/A NA No N/A N/A N/A limit *Single family residential shall comply with the density and development standards of the MFR zone. Staff, Agency & Public Comment Staff & Agency Comments Public Comment ❑ City's Public Works ❑ No public comments ❑ Spokane Valley Fire to date ❑ Sewer ❑ WSDOT ❑ Yellowstone Pipeline C PA_2 0 1 9-0 00 9 _... E _ sa _ - I•'f'•1i1': Study Area °"-'4f�� , � _ E •= f11 F Homo I4 �r _ IMPRI' , 1 '''''l puBLic . , . .._ , , ..,, _ „„,„,.., .,,. . . .., -;it. .Si b ' ' ,44 1, COMMENT 1. _ �F V11ti ,i111 \1C ,0-.0,„.e. r i rt,,, ,,-;--;,,,,,, ,,...-.:—,------, k.;„.:. ,...... r‘ ... ... .4. .1,,,,,,c... e N--- (please come to podium) �_ _ _ . , rr-, f........„ r 1 ; any — _ : ., , , -,:cH..14gAr., 1 1, _jig 1 "'M.-- tea. ' ,r ;.—g77... . r '. '-.i ,:Jo- ..,,,, _ le: t=1:11H--: -- F _ z { _r i ; : [:. ._ Ft .. 511..,..., trprb,--1,,., {' `,',. r E"1 +1 r Vii.' �L'7 ,' J A. NEXT Steps Amendment P 0 • Planning Commission Study Session — Feb. 14, 2019 U • Public Hearin . — F , ' r • e uberations and Recommendations = Marc 4 2019 • Administrative Report • First Reading • Second Reading 0 -1 Comprehensive Plan Amendments NEXT STEPS TAB 2 COMMUNITY & PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT *Wane, BUILDING PLANNING DivIS1ON STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION . a CPA-2019-0001 STAFF REPORT DATE: February 6, 2019 HEARING DATE AND LOCATION: February 28, 2018, beginning at 6:00 p.m, Spokane Valley City Hall Council Chambers, 10210 East Sprague Avenue, Spokane Valley, Washington 99206. Project Number: CPA-2019-0001 Application Description: Request to change the Comprehensive Plan Land Ilse Designation from Industrial(I)to Single Family Residential (SFR)and to change the Zoning District from Industrial (1)to Single Family Residential Urban (R-3) Location: Parcel number 45183.9059; addressed as 622 North Park Road, located 300 feet south of the intersection of Park Road and Broadway Avenue, further located in the SW 1/4 of Section 18, Township 25 North, Range 44 East. Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washington 1?wrrer Applicant: Danny Davis,Circle J Mobile Home Park, LLC!3580 North Gunnar Court, Coeur D'Alene, ID 83815 Owner: Sue S. Garcia Family Limited Partnership, 16.93 Eureka Road, Suite 300, Roseville, CA 95661 Date of Application: October 24, 2018 Staff Contact: Karen Kendall, .Planner APPROVAL CRITERIA: Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan, Title 17 Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVIv1C) General Provisions, Title 19 SVMC Zoning Regulations, and Title 21 SVMC Environmental Controls. ATTACHMENTS Exhibit 1: Application Exhibit 6: Environment Determination Exhibit 2: Vicinity Map Exhibit 7: Notice of Public Flearing Exhibit 3; Comprehensive Plan Map Exhibit 8: Agency Comments Exhibit 4: Zoning Map Exhibit 9: Graphics Exhibit 5: SETA Checklist A. BACKGROUND INFORMATION The site-specific Comprehensive Plan Map and Zoning Map amendment is a privately-initiated request to change the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation of parcel 45183.9059 from Industrial (I)to Single Family Residential (SFR) and to change the Zoning District from Industrial (I)to Single Family Residential Urban (R-3). Staff Report CPA-2019-0001 The contiguous parcel to the cast is also owned by Circle J Mobile Home Park and is caned R-3, 'The property owner would like to develop the property with a 30 unit cottage development cm the 2.7 acre site, In order to allow a cottage develaprnent or other residential Lttse the land use designation mist he changed. The subject parcel underwent a rezone in NH from Agricultural: Suburban to Restricted Industrial with Spokane County, Since incorporation in 2003, the site has remained Industrial zoned, PROPERTY YNFORMATION Size and Characteristics: The property consists of to single parcel 2.7 acres in size with frontage on Park Road. • Comprehensive Plan: Industrial (l) Zoning: — Industrial (I) Existing Land Use: Vacant land. SURROUNDING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN,ZONING,AND LAND USES: Contprehensive Plan: Single Faintly Residential (SFR)and Neighborhood Corninercial (NC) North Zoning Single Family Residential Urban (R-3) Uses: Single family residences, convenience store and multi-tenant building under construction. Comprehensive Plan: Industrial MI South Zoning: Industrial(I) Uses: Vacant and office/warehouse use under construction Comprehensive Plan: Single Family Residential (SIR) East Zoning: Single Family Residential Urban (R-3) Uses: Circle J Manufactured Mobile Home Park Comprehensive Plan: Industrial (I) West Zoning: Industrial (I) Uses: Single family residences, lumber warehouse and storage yard, contractor's yard and former mining pit. • IMPLICATIONS: Rezone of the site to R-3 would reduce the allowable uses from a broad range of industrial uses to single family,duplex,cottage;, townhomees, dayc.ar-es, school and church uses. The R-3 zone would allow six dwelling units per acre and up to 12 units per acre with cottage development, The Single-family Residential Urban zone is intended for single-family residential development at an urban density that provides flexibility and promotes reinvestment in existing single-fair ily neighborhoods. Changing the land'use designation and zoning of the subject parcel will impact adjacent industrial properties as future development will be subject to chapter 19.75 SVI IC(transitional regulations) thereby limiting ability for full site development, T'he transitional standards include greater setbacks, screening requirements, and restrictions on the location of parking, drive aisles, loading areas,and mechanical equipment, If approved,the transitional regulations would apply to any new development on the four parcels adjacent to the subject parcel located west and South, The industrial zoned parcels would have Page 2 of 1 0 Staff Report CPA-2019-0041 less buildable area if the transitional regulations are applied. Landscaping, parking, lighting and on-site treatment of stormwater would also be required consistent with the development regulations. Graphic 1, provided in Exhibit 9, shoves the relationship of the proposed subject parcel to the four adjacent parcels. Within each of the parcel boundaries shown in red,the green shading represents the buffer of transitional regu1atiens that would be applicable to new development. The transitional standards would significantly limit development of Parcel 2 as the R-3 zoning would border on two sides of a lot only 70 feet by 150 feet in size. The remaittinr three lots would have reduced develoahle ffr as a result of the transitional standards although they are lar-aa enou_ii to devela. Note that the transitional standards Woeld not apply to existing development on thesites. Conversely, Graphic 2 of Exhibit 9 shows the transitional regulations imposed upon the subject parcel if the zoning did not change and industrial development was to occur on the land adjacent to the existing R-3 zoned properties located north and east. The City is reviewing a building permit and conducted a pre-application meeting en parcels in the immediate vicinity of the subject parcel represented in Graphic 3 of Exhibit 9. SLD-2018-2241 to construct an 18,000 square foot office, sales and warehouse facility is currently under review by the City on parcel 45183.9150 located approximately 250 feet south of amendment site on the northeast corner of Park Road and Valleyway Avenue. Additionally, a pre-application meeting was conducted on parcel 45183.9151 to construct a 40,000 square foot office and window manufacturing facility. However, formal application has not been submitted. Graphic 4 of Exhibit 9 highlights the implementation of the transitional regulations on the parcel to the south to show the first 30 feet is limited in development to address the impacts of two potentially incompatible uses adjacent to each other. If development were proposed following the land use change to R-3 the pre-application proposal would be required to redesign the site plan to accommodate the transitional standards in the area adjacent to the proposed R-3 zone, The following table provides a comparison of the development requirements for both zones. R-3 & I Development Standard Comparison Lot Maximums Minimum Setbacks Building gGarageDensity Zone Height Coverage Front Rear Yard Side Yard R-3 35 ft. 50% 15 ft. 20 ft. 5 ft. 20 ft du'slac r 1 _ None N/A * Iti(1A N/A *Setbacks comply with transitional'regulations and International Building Code: APPLICATION PROCESSING: Chapter 17,80 Permit Processing Procedures in the SVMC. The following summarizes Rey application procedures for the proposal. Pre-Application lvieeting: -September 19,2018 Application Submitted: . October 24,2018 SEPA Determination ofluon-Si r ificartce DNS Issue date January 25,2019 End of A,seal Period for DNS: Not At sealed Februar 5,2419 Date of Posted Notice of Public}nearing January 30,2019 Date of Published Notice of Public Hearin:: Januar 25 2019 Date of Mailed Notice of Public Hearin*: Janne 30,2019 Page 3of10 Staff Report CPA-2019-000 1 B. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO SEPA 1. Findings: Pursuant to Title 21 (Environmental Controls) SVVMC, the lead agency has determined that this proposal does 11 01 have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required ander- RCW 43.21C.03o(2)(c). The Building and Planning Division issued a Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) for the proposal on January 25, 2019. The determination was made after review of a completed environmental checklist, the application, Titles 19, 21, and 22 SVCVIC, a site assessment, public and agency comments, and other information on file with the lead agency. 2. Conclusion(s): The procedural requirements of the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) and Title 21 SVMC have been fulfilled. C. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN A_M FNDMENT AND REZONE 1. Compliance with Title 17 (General Provisions) of 11w Spokane Valley Municipal Code a. Findings: SVMC 17.80,140(H). Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezone Approval Criteria i, The City may approve Comprehensive Plan amendments and area-wide zone trap amendments if it finds that: (1) The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to the public health, safety, welfare,and protection of the environment; Analysis: The proposed SFR designation is intended to allow for single-family residential development at an urban density that privies flexibility and promotes reinvestment in existing single-family neighborhoods. This de.sign at ion presently exists to the Frorth and east of the aniendrrrent site. Transitional regulations will limit the impacts of new development, however they will not address impacts front existing uses, It is possible that conflicts may result by allor°ving the extension of residential uses into areas surrounded by other types of uses. The amendment area is located within the service boundaries of Spokane Comity Environmental Services and Spokane County Water District No. 3. Other utilities such as electricity, telephone and garbage ore to be provided by franchise utility providers in conformance with applicable City standards and regarirernerntr_ Spokane County Fire District No, I is the fire protection service provider for the City of Spokane Valley, rind the police service provider is the City of Spokane Valley. Park Road is identified in the City of Spokane Valley Transportation Network as on urban minor arterial. Safety related services such as fire, police and road access are adequate to serve the amended area, Complaints regarding traffic, truck traffic, and speeding along Ella Road, one block east of subject site, have been filed with the city. The City and Spokane's Sheriff Community Oriented Policing Effort (SCOPE) conducted a speed study in June 20.18. Page 4 uf 10 Staff Report CPA-2019-1100 I Botta studies showed that the 85 percentile are driving Within five miles of the posted speed limit_ Currently there are conflicts resrxltirtg,from residential uses adjacent to industrial uses. industrial arses generally function with an increase of light, noise, pollution, and traffic, which conflict with residential neighborhoods. Comprehensive .Plan policy Lli-P7 which states, "Protect residential neighborhoods from incompatible land ages and adverse impacts associated with transportation cord-rdors,",shall be considered to allevlateyfttture impacts. The amendment area has no critical areas or designated natural resources. The public health, .wifely, welfare and protection of tate environment are promoted by standards established by the state and the City's regulations. The slight decrease of industrial lands would have a marginal impact on the industrial lands available, but is not consistent with policy Li{P12 "Maintain a robust supply of productive industrial land. " (2) The proposed amendment is consistent with the requirements of Chapter 36:70A RCW and with the portion of the City's adopted plan not affected by the amendment; Analysis: The Growth Management Act (CM) adopts thirteen goals to guide the development of local comprehensive plans and development regulations. Pursuant to the Urban Growth and Housing goal, the request would allow development where adequate public facilities and services are provided and promote a variety of residential densities and housing types. The request would also allow residential development' opportunity for housing on a parcel where the land use designation currently does not allose standalone housing. The site is proximal to various services (e.g.: school, park, convenience store. bars stop) and a multi-tenant commercial complex is under construction all within walking distance. (However, in contrast the following Comprehensive Plan goal and policies conflict with the proposed amendment.- a. ED-P6 Promote the development or redevelopment ofvacant and underutilized properties,particularly those with potential to serve as a catalyst for economic development. b. LU-G3 Support the transformation of commercial, industrial, and mixed-use areas into accessible districts that attract economic activity c: I.Li-P5 Ensure compatibility between adjacent residential and commercial or industrial uses. r LU-P12 Maintain a robust supply of productive industrial lard (3) The proposed amendment responds to n substantial change in conditions beyond the property owner's control applicable to the area within which the subject property lies; Analysis: Parcel 45183.9059 and parcel 45183,9601 (located adjacent to the east), are under the same ownership; as discussed in Section A (background inforn?ation), parcel 45183.9601 is zoned R-3, and parcel 45153.9059 has been zoned iraa'ustrtrrl since 1980. No substantial change of conditions to the subject parcel or to the surrounding area has been noted. The area continues to develop with a variety of industrial uses. Page 5 of I t) Staff Repoli CPA-2019-0001 (4) The proposed amendment corrects an obvious mapping error; or Analysts: The amendment is riot in response to a mapping error and would not correct any error. (5) The proposed amendment addresses an identified deficiency in the Comprehensive Plan, Analysis: Figure 15 of the Comprehensive Plan indicates 49.7 percent of lands within the City are desrgnated residential verses 6.5percent erre designated as industrial. The plan identified sucient lands for both industrial and residential development_ /Wimp changes in the land use would not create a deficiency in industrial lands. ii. The City must also consider the following factors prior to approving Comprehensive Plan amendments: (1) The effect upon the physical environment; Analysis: Where are no known physical char•acierisricr that would create difficulties in developing the property milder the proposed designation, This is a rton-project action and future development will be evaluated for compliance with all environmental requirements. (2) The effect on open space, streams,rivers, and Iakes; Analysis: There are no Mown critical areas associated with the site, such as wetlands, fish and wildhle hobliar areas, frequently flooded areas or geologically haaaidous areas. The site is not located within the shoreline jurisdiction and there we no known surface water quality or quantity issues. (3) The compatibility with and impact on adjacent land uses and surrounding neighborhoods; Analysis: Transitional Mgufations provide a rraeasure to address compatibility of properties with wore intensive zoning that abut less intensively zoned properties, This would apply to the west and south jour abutting industrial zoned parcels as previously discussed in the Implications £ecrian above and shown in Graphic 4 of Exhibit 9. Transitional regulations will address new development; however the regulations will not address impacts from existing uses_ It is passible that conflicts may be created by allowing the extension of residential uses into areas surrounded by other types of uses, A change to the R-3 zoning would allow residential uses to be developed adjacent to parcels zoned„fora range of industrial uses. There are limited measures to mitigate such impacts as noise, traffic, and pollution of dust between incompatible uses. As previously Mentioned, complaints regarding traffic, truck traffic, and speeding along Ella Road, one block east of subject site, have been filed with the city. Based on complaints it appears that residents are concerned about traffic conditions. Page 6of10 Staff Report CPA-2D19-0,001 (4) The adequacy of and impact on community facilities including utilities, roads, public transportation,parks, recreation, and schools; A rt alysis: The City of Spokaan e Valley addresses adequacy of community facilities on a citywide basis through copilot facilities planning_ A level of service standard is identified for each of the city services. Policy CF-P6 of the Comprehensive Plan recommends that the Cita ensure that facilities and services meet the rrrinhmttrn Level of Service standards. This is irrrplernertted through chapter 22.20 SVMC Concurrency. The City's Senior Traffic Engineer reviewed the proposal and generally found that no impacts are anticipated. (5) The benefit to the neighborhood, City, and region; Analysis: The proposed site-specific map amendment may affect the surrounding neighborhood by increasing the incompatibility of uses adjacent to each other and disadvantaging industrial zoned properties by limiting buildable area pursuant to policy T-F2 which states "Consider neighborhood traffic and livability conditions and address patential adverse impacts of public and private projects during the planning, designing, permitting, and construction phases. " Park Road is designated crs a minor arterial however it is salt improved to accommodate pedestrian traffic to commercial services in the vicinity. (6) The quantity and location of land planned for the proposed land use type and density and the demand for such land; Analysis: Comprehensive Plan policy _ U P12 states, 'Maintain a robust supply of productive industrial liana"As previously stated the residential land use designation makes rip half of the City's land use compared to 6.5 percent of industrial lands in the City. There are adequate lands available to accommodate the projectedfuture demand of residential and industrial lands. The City has the residential land capacity to accoanmodate over 19.980 additional people by 2037, (7) The current and projected population density in the area;and Analysis: Spokane Valley has experienced steady, but modest population growth since its incorporation, growing at a rate of about 1% per year. The City's population density is currently 2,414 people per square mile The amendment totaling 2.7 acres will have marginal affect an the density of the area at six dwelling units per acre in the R-3 zone. The increase in density for the area was not contemplated in the Comprehensive Plan for the parcel. The change will have marginal impact on population density. (8) The effect upon other aspects of the Comprehensive Plan. Analysis: Staff notes that the applicant identified severed Growth Management Act (GMA) goals and a policy that indicated the change in land use would enhance the character and quality of life, and provide essential land uses, that include a ordable Page 7 of IC Staff Report CPQ+.-20194)001 homing (see aapplicatton narrative), However, staff reviewed the application and noted in section C.La.i(2) that the request was in conflict with a Comprehensive Plan goal and several policies, Cone!"'skirt(s): For the reasons outlined above the proposed amendment is not consistent with SVa1 C }78t,/4O(14). 2. Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan Findings: The proposed amendment is not consistent.with the goals, policies and strategies of the Comprehensive Plan.The amendment k proposing residential land use on a 2.7 acre parcel, The change would disadvantage four adjacent parcels by limiting the available land to develop due to transitional regulations could further limit the attractiveness for economic development. Residential development may be affected by the existing industrial zoned parcels south and west of the site relative to intensity of use, operation hours, light, noise, pollution and traffic, thus not ensuring compatibility. The neighlrhood (south of Broadway Avenue and east of Park Road) has seen no change in land use designation since the incorporation of Spokane Valley in 2003, with the exception of the convenience store being changed from a residential to commercial designation to be consistent with the use.There is a conflict between increasing the size of the residential neighborhood, while introducing more environmental factors related to industrial uses that may make a neighborhood undesirable. A place where someone lives, sleeps and congregates inside and outside of dwelling is harder to adjust to incompatible uses verses an industrial use looking to maintain operations. impacts associated with undesirable conditions and incompatibility between uses could be expected if additional residential land is introduced adjacent to industrial uses A review of the applicable goals and policies ofthe Comprehensive Plan, which was discussed in section C.i.a,i(2), concluded that the request was not consistent, Cone!usian(s): The proposed amendment is not consistent with the City's Adopted Comprehensive Plan. 3. Adequate Public Facilities a. Findings: The Growth Management Act(GMA)and the City's Comprehensive Plan requires that public facilities and services be adequate to serve the development at the time the development is available for occupancy. The area is currently served with the services by Spokane County Water District No. 3, Spokane County Environmental Services, Spokane Valley Fire District, and West Valley School district provide water, sewer, and fire protection and schools services in this area. Urban services are available- The Comprehensive Plan did not anticipate this area being used for residential. Specific site needs will be addressed at the time a de elopmcnt is proposed for the site. b. Conclusion(s): The proposed amendment will have adequate urban services at the time of development. Page 8 of 10 Staff Report CPA-2Di9-0001 D. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO PUBLIC COMMENTS L Findings: Staff has received no public comments to date. Comments received following the date of this report will be provided to the Planning Commission at the February 28,2019 meeting. 2. Cwiclusiuu(s): Notice of Public Hearing(NOPIA)will be published on February 8, and February 15, 2019. The NOP1-1 will be posted on site and mailed on or before February 13, 2019 to residents within an 8.00 foot radius. Pursuant to Section 17.0,120.B.I,c the City dotermined it was appropriate to increase the radius from 400 feet to 800 feet due to the likely public interest in the proposed amendment. E. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECLFIC TO AGENCY COMMENTS 1. Findings: Staff has not received any agency corrrrnerns o '.signi ficw ce is date. Agency Received Comments Dated Corn merits Ci of S iokane Vall- Senior Traffic En;ineer Yes Januar 17,2019 City of Spokane Valley Development Engineering Yes January 9, 2019 City of Spokane Valley Building&Planning - City of Spokane Valley Parks & Recreation Spokane Valley Fire Department Yes January 9,2019 City of Millwood Ci c f Lihe Lake City of Spokane City of Spokane Valley Police Department Spokane County, Building and Planning S.+ . _ . ,, �r y. + I u . er " Spokane County, Clean Air Agency Spokane County, Fire District No. l Srokane CCoun Fire District No, S _ Spokane County Regional Health District Spokane Regional Clean Air Agency Spokane Aquifer Joint Board Spokane Transit Authority(STA) Washington State Dept of Ecology(Olympia) Washington State Dept of Ecology(Spokane) Yes Januar 16,2019 Washington State Dept of Fish &.Wildlife Washington State Dept of Natural Resources Washington State Dept of Transportation Washington State Parks & Recreation Commission WA Archaeological &Historic Preservation Avista Utilities Inland Power &Light Modern Electric Water Company Central.Valley School District#35 East Valley School District#361 Page 9'of10 Staff Report CPA-20194)0i West Valley School District#363 Century Link - Coincast Model Irrigation District#l8 Consolidated Irrigation District#19 East Spokane Water District#1 Vera Water& Power _ Spokane County 'Water District -B3 - Spokane Tribe of Indians Yellowstone Pipeline Yes January 3, 219 Conelusicn(s): No concerns are noted. F. CONCLUSION: For the reasons set forth in Section C (1 and 2)the proposed amendment to change the land use designation from Ito SFR is not consistent with the requirements of the SVMC 17.80.140(1-i) and the Comprehensive Plan. Page [0 of 10 EXHIBIT 1 i11ti+H kane � aI�ey COMPREHENISVE PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION e. The proposed amendment addresses an identified deficiency in the Comprehensive Plan. STAFF USE ONLY Date Submitted; td I Received by: Fee: a- r■ -- PLUS*, .PLUS#:, NLA File*: +L = sly{ PART II — APPLICATION INFORMATION 7 Map Amendment; or ❑ Text Amendment APPLICANT NAME: 00filiVF D f i5 —_ I_ C IUI►��LItaG Atiof�ES$: tJ'�' �� GITY• � +� �� $TATE ZIP:S � Kt. PHONE: - FAX: CELL: 2 rYt1 ' 3 EMAIL: PROPERTY OWNER; r t t /add,ae V f$ MAILING ADDRESS: .f11 Cjc ) ( GITir: o 04+" �' + ' t +� STATE712 ZIP: 9-31' PHONE FAX: CELL: - EMAIL: SITE ADDRESS; .'t 2 , PARCEL NO.: 11 )✓ 5 � . COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: T, 111( V+ PROPCISED COI1 PREHENstVE PLAN DESIGNATION: ZONING I]EsIGNATION: >-'> re-4•i. R 4 PROPOSED ZONING DESIGNATION: BRIEFLY EX.AIN REASON FORMA!?OR TEXT AMENDMENT Ottached hill explanatfcrt on separate sheet of paper}' " t t riefufttir s 7i1`. r}I • [moi ` ' r; �I PL as V1.D Pawl 3 of SPCK..Nr ).)41 L4Y CON1i44UNhT' DEVELOPMENT pt In , alley COMPREFIENISVEPLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION PART HI — AUTHORIZATION (Signature of legal owner or applicant} 0741 i f"-)-4 l , (prtn# name) swear or affirm that the above responses are made truthfn to the beet of my knowledge:—' (Si riat6re) (Date) NOTARY STATE OFWASHINGTOI4) ss; COUNTY OF SPOKANE } SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this } day of --"�` ZIP NOTARY SEAL c _tee ----- NOTARY NOTARY SIGNATURE 7 r ' tfr Notary Public in and for the State of Washington 1r11 Residing et 01% AUBvP „9 f{f1„. oF �` My appointment expire : r�ItIt11111\ y `- LEGAL OWNER AUTHORIZATION: If the applicant is not the legal Dwner(s), the owner must provide the following acknowledgement; I ,owner oftha above described property do hereby authorize to represent me and my interests in all matters regarding this application. PL-U6 V'I U Page 5 of October 24th,201E City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Amendment for parcel#45183,9059 Dear City of Spokane Valley teadership, My name is Danny Davis, and I represent the ownership group who not only owns the parcel of property in the subject matter, but also the adjacent parcel which is currentiy operating as a 61-unit mobile home community for individuals who are 55 and odder.Since acquisition of this project, we have invested over$200,000 into improving the property and are scheduled to spend another$125,000 on brand-new paving.This investment has been good to us, and we intend on being good to the low- income seniors who reside in cur mobile home community. We consider both the mobile home park and this subject parcel as long-term investments.The purpose of this proposal is to transition the zoning classification of our vacant land to one that is more in harmony with the 55 and older mobile home park. We respect and agree with the concerns cited by staff around the complications of residential areas adjacent to industrial users.This is part of our motivation to move our subject parcel away from the industrial zoning to reduce the exposure of our current 55 and older community to industrial users, This will allow us to limit our exposure to the industrial zoning to a single southern property line. ■ Inaiusulrl Peninsula 11 _ I 1 As you can see above,the current industrial zoning creates a peninsula that extends mostly via our subject parcel into an area that is primarily residential.Our proposal would help eliminate this and reduce the overall exposure to the neighboring residents from industrial type uses. It also allows us the opportunity to establish proper noise and space buffers between the majority of these residents and potential future industrial users to the south. Now onto your specific line of questioning. I think itis important to note that many of the answers provided below are centered around the concept of a 55 and older cottage style development, which is what we are currently considering.We understand that the council must look at the Trost intensive possible usage allowed in the proposed zoning, which is why we want to be transparent with our planned usage of a cottage style project. With that, I woild like to begin to address some of the specific criteria as requested: 17.80140(W Anorovaf Criteria .L The ity may ottly Drip,irove Comprehensive Plan Amendments and area-wide zoning mal! amendments if it finds that: a) Does the proposed amendment bear a substantial relationship to the public health,safety, welfare, and protection of the environment? A residential usage represents a far lower risk to the environment and public health than the options associated with industrial zoning. b) Is the proposed amendment consistent with the requirements of Chapter RCW 36.70A and with the portion of the City's adopted plan not affected by the amendment? RCW 36,70A.070 section 2 subsection A "A housin• element ensurina the vita ht and character c estublishedresidential rrei•fiborhoads that.(a) includes an ifIVErtorcul sis vjexisting and projected housing needs that identifies the number of housing units necessary to maracas projected growtl]." As noted at the 2018 Market Forum put on by the SKRERC, Spokane and Kootenai County are the fastest graving areas within the United States for"In" migration, (l.e.) individuals who are moving from other states and counties to our area. Most of this growth is from those who are 65 and older, and the supply of housing directly targeted for these Individuals is lagging far behind. RCW 36.70A.090 'IA comprehensive plan should provide for innovative land use management techniques, including? but 'PA riot limited to densit bonusescluster housiri+ ,iariried unit aievelo'rrnerlts and the trans ero development rionts.' • The city of Spokane Valley's adop-ion of cottage style housing has been a perfect example of what this section is referencing. We want to be one of the first to implement this concept to prove Its functionality and desirability. RCW 36.70A.020subsection 1 "Hibor? rawth. Encaura a develo went drr urbauz areas wirers rude oats ubfic ncilities and services exist or can be provided in an efficient manner." This project would expand housing well within the City's public service areas. RCW 36.70A.020 subsection 2 'Reduce sprawl. Reduce the inappropriate conversion of undeveloped laird into sprawling, low-density development.,, This project Is an example of an infili pooled that would help fulfill a need for specific type of housing and lower the demand for projects further away from the City Center. Rale 36.70,4.020 subsection 4 1-lousing Encouragthe availability of affordable housing to all econorrrfcseoraents of the population of this state, promote a variety o residential densities arrrl ho sinct wipes, and encourege preservation r�( existinai housing stock.' RCW36.70.215 subsection E 'Vent! in. the measures to increase houslni cruailabilit and aordobili or all economic se•ments a the com munity and the factors cc,ntribr firm to the high cost oousinlncludrrr4 zoning/development/environmental regulations,permit processing timelines, housing production trends by housing type and rents and prices national and regbncri ecanarnic and demographic trends off ecting housing affordability and production by.rents and prices,. housing unit size by housing type, and how well growth taraers alien with market conditions including the assumptions on Where,pule desire to live.' Roth subsection 4 and subsection E speak to the need for targeting the demand of the individuals that both reside within our community and are moving to our community, and ensuring that the wide range of those needs are met. We believe this is compatible with our proposed zone change. Upon review of Chapter RCW 36.70A, this proposed change does not appear to be in direct tiriolatiort of any of the stated guidelines adopted by the City of Spokane Valley. Compatibility with the current Comprehensive Plan adapted by the City of Spokane Valley in December of 2016: lousing is a key issue for rncrrry 5pakarre urrliev residents and participants in the visioning workshops highlighted housing affarclability,housing for seniors, and hausi'rrgslir'ersity as important challenges far the Cjy to address." Chapter 1 page 16 Our proposed zone change and future-planned development would both offer diversity in housing and additional opportunities for senior housing. "Maintain and enhance the character and quality of life rn Saokrine Volley." Land Use Goa!1 A cottage style development, as referenced, will offer character and quality of life for the community. "Provide for land uses that are essential to Spokane Volley residents, employees, and visitors" Land Use Goal 2 Additional housing for seniors is essential. "Enable the development of a fordable housing for crfl_r."racorrrelevels," --Housing Goal 2 A development such as the one we are proposing would offer additional supply in a diverse form of housing for middle-income seniors. "Adopt development regulations that expand housing choices by allowing innovative hsusino types includin, tin homes or'cesso dwelfin, units re- abricated homes co-housin• cotta i e housin and other housing types." Housing Policy 2 We aim to take advantage of this adoption of the new types of housing that are focused on in this policy. c) Does the proposed amendment respond to a substantial change in conditions beyond the property owners control applicable to the area within which the subject property lies? No. d) Does the proposed amendment correct an obvious mapping error, or does the proposed amendment address an identified deficiency in the Comprehensive plan? This certainly isn't a mapping error,and I believe that "deficiency" is too strong of a word. However,we do believe that the subject property is better suited for a residential zoning due to the impacted neighboring property being a 55 and older mobile home community. As stated in the introduction,the reduction or elimination of the industrial zoned 'peninsula' along Park Road will reduce the length of potential conflicting uses and therefore reduce the need for buffering between industrial and residential zones. e) What is the effect upon the physical environment caused by this proposed amendment? We believe the simple reduction in zoning from the more intense usage of industrial to residential will create a much smaller negative impact on the environment. Z The Cl shall also consider the allawinactors riot to a, ,rouin, Comprehensive Plan Amendments. a) What is the effect upon the physical environment? The vacant lot itself is relatively undesirable as it stands,so no negative impact on the physical environment.Just the basic development ascetics of a residential project. 14 What is the effect on open spate,streams,rivers,and lakes? There is zero impact on any of the above. c) What is the compatibility with and impact on adjacent land use and surrounding neighborhoods? As noted before, this change will be in perfect harmony with the primary neighboring usage of a 61-unit mobile home cornmueity. Having said that, we are also keenly aware of the drawbacks of residential uses in arid around industrial areas;those drawbacks being primarily due to noise and traffic. I am happy to speak to this, as we have owned the 61-unit mobile home park for over S years now. Over that period, we have not received a single complaint pertaining to noise generated from the neighboring industrial users.We have, however, received complaints from one of two tenants located directly on Ella Road, These are our only two units located on a main arterial, and it has been noted to us that the large semi- trucks that travel up and down this road in the early hours of the morning can be a nuisance. Outside of those individuals, we have zero complaints from anyone else within the corn munity. It's for this reason we would never build new units directly on Park Road with our subject property. Units will be set back, separated by natural space, fencing,and landscaping to prevent future complaints. It is also important to note that the cottages we would intend to build would be much more sound proof than a manufactured home that was built in the early 1990s, d) What is the adequacy of Impact on community facilities including utilities, roads,public transportation,parks,recreation,and schools? Specifically, we would need to utilize the sanitary sewer system and Spokane Water District. Park Road appears to be a perfectly adequate arterial to support a development of this kind, and I would venture to guess most individuals here would utilize their own transportation rather than public.Schools wilt likely not be impacted by the introduction of a small 55 and older Cornmunit'yr, but parks and recreation could certainly see a slight increase in traffic. e) What is the benefit to the neighborhood, City, and Region? Without intending to sound like a broken record, this zone change would be a huge benefit to our existing mobile home community as its mast impacted neighbor. Any type of industrial usage would be detrimental to the 90+individuals who currently call the mobile home park their home. The benefit for the City and Region is the continued introduction into the market of a new style of housing project. Apartments (glorified boxes) are going up by the thousands,and single family residential has remained largely unchanged for decades. A cottage development adds flavor and identity to a community.Something new and different that will help inspire others to do more of the same. f1 What is the quantity and location of land planned for the proposed land use type and density and the demand for such land? The subject parcel in question is 2,72 acres. We believe that due to the demographics that are moving our community,our proposed project would be healthy in demand. g) What is the current and projected population density in the area? Please see attached demographic report from Coldwell Banker Commercial. h) How would this effect other aspects of the Comprehensive Plan? think the net effect would be 2.72 acres less of industrial land in this area. It certainly doesn't appear that a small change of this size would have any greater impact. 3.Au site-sperrfic zaninrrlau amenr meat regu its slwIl meet Rl!of the llutnring criteria: a) Does the project meet the requirements ander Chapter 22.20 SVMC, Concurrency? I believe this will ultimately be unto City staff to confirm, bttt upon review of this code the subject property does in fact meet the requirements of Concurrency. lr) Does this Amendment bear a substantial relation to the public health,safety, and welfare; To be candid,I believe this type of question is geared towards more intense uses such as heavy manufacturing, gas/oil production,smelter plants, mines,etc. I don't believe the development of a small cottage style development on a parcel originally zoned industrial has any major impact on any of these metrics. c) Is this warranted in order to achieve consistency with the Comprehensive Plan or because of+a need for additional property in the proposed zoning district classification, or because the proposed zoning classification is appropriate for reasonable development of the subject property? specifically, in our case, I believe we fit comfortably within the final portion of this question, We believe our proposed zoning change is reasonable considering the surrounding usages, d) Is the subject property adjacent and contiguous to rr property of the same or higher zoning classification? Yes, our mobile home park is currently the same zoning we are requesting on the subject parcel. ej Would this amendment be materiofly detrimental to the uses or property in the immediate vicinity of the subject property? Certainly not.A reduction in zoning intensity will be a benefit for the surrounding existing uses and property owners, fj Does this have merit and voltie for the community as a whole? I touched on this a bit in question#9. We consider the value proposition to the community as a whole to be fulfilling a need for senior housing in our community and building a project that is unique that can be seen as an example for future projects. Concerns specifically cited by Spokane Volley Staff A new residential project near industrial users. Concerns with noise generated from neighboring industrial use's, and industrial traffic and adjacent arterials: This has been addressed in the answer to line item#7. We already have strong reason to believe that there are no problems with the standard day-to-day noise generated by neighboring industrial users as we would have already experienced those complaints from any number of our SO+tenants in our mobile home park community. As for traffic noise,this is a very valid concern that we respect, Any project we do will have enough space, landscaping,and fence borders between Park Road and the nearest residence to ensure any road noise is mitigated. The inclusion of neighboring properties located at 630 and 708 N. Park Road in the Comprehensive Plan Amendment to prevent the isolation of two small tots left on an island of industrial Zoning, assuming this proposal was accepted: Both of these property owners have been contacted and do not have an interest in being included in the zone change, Both have noted interest in the option of being acquired to be included with our subject property and whatever development might become of it. i think based on the size of these two properties, even combined,the plan was always to hold out for a development on the larger piece behind and aim to be acquired or aligned with it. We are not interested in purchasing these properties at this time. It is for these reasons we were unable to include these two properties in our amendment request, Thank you in advance for your time andconsideration in this matter. Kindest Regards, Danny Davis Circle J, LLC COLDWELL CI BANKER 1 COMMERCIAL 6 rern 6101 _ . Demographics for Nritr Iwo, 622 N Park Rd , Spokane Valley, Washington United States . . _. . • . _ 4 , 1-1111w4 ,..... ...n3,-I WWI I•2 S1I /. -. t2 -$4 .... . al. T t .1.,4. Otis CI rihxds 1 - 1 -, a Celts I 1."24442.4A A2r4 , .4I.m . 1L .. ,..2611'44 wa.1 .x 1 vo, *1111,44; .4 444 I 4. .. .2.... ...2.2r,,,,,..-2.2.4.7.......z..........,," 41121,1, ' ' - NOWAri. 41 ..RNLI 4'..4 AM -,. WIT[MI VII 3 . 1 .0,44441 or R 42.12444,W1.411. CP Ili'd 9,;L': 'Ain wansis910 ., :,- 01111911 L 44 A4.# 1, C Iltrld Ayr 1 CD,JiTer4ro. N ;1 .. - + / r , , t ,... 1 Natal. 1iI hiabg; 4. i 1t j ILlsriiink i LI.blip!) Mar. 1.,r 41.;;;•11Egga,,,at.vrorsesat a 2_1U.-MI . . . . . .. .. . Population Pop luiation 1-mi. 2-mi. 3-ml. Total Population (US Census 2010) 5,906 22,746 51,657 Total Papulation (Current Year) 6,063 23,604 54,069 Total Population (Five Year Projection) 5,015 23,831 55,100 Adult Population (U5 Census 2010) 4,570 17,598 39,343 Adul:Population(Current Year) 4,741 18,446 41,550 Adult Population (Five Year Projection) 4,707 18,643 42,403 % Femme Population(U5 Census 2010) 49.34% 49.8% 50.4% % Male Population(LJ5 Census 2010) 50.66% .50.2% 49.b% lib Female Population (Current Year) 48.82% 49.439 50,14% %Male Population (Current Year) 51.18% 5057%6 49.86% %Pernale Population(Five Year Projection) 48.68% 4937% 50.05% % Male Population (Five Year Projection) 51.32% 50.63% 49.95% Total Daytime Population 9,997 35,287 55,190 Population aged 16 and under(Children) 1,505 4,805 10,725 Daytime population (Age 16+) 8,492 30,482 54,46 Civilian 16+, at Workplace 6,190 23,626 37,362 Retired population (Age 65+) 764 3,087 5,819 Homemakers (Age 16+) 464 1,612 3,850 Population Mosaic (Current Year) 1-mi. 2-mi, 3-ml. % Power Elite 0% O% %flourishing Families 0% 0% O% % Booming with Confidence 0% 0.93% 5,194 %Suburban Style 0% 0% 0% %Thriving Boomers 0% 6.02% 8.32% % Prorr;ising Families 0% 0% 0% Young City sales 0% 0% 0% % Middle-class Melting Pot 0% 0% i3% %f=amily Union 0% 0% 1.49% %Autumn Years 451% 22.89% 23.4% % Significant Singles 0% 839% 5.14% %Blue Sky Boomers 44.18% 41.41% 33.79% % Families in Motion 0 0% 0,98% 4b Pastoral Pride 0% 0% 0% %Singles and Starters 0% 3.58% 11.74% %Cultural Connections 0% 0% 0% %Golden year Guardians 6.66% 4.6% 2.35% %Aspirational Fusion 0% 0% 0)2% %Economic Challenges 4.07% 11.79% 7,39% % Unclassified 0% 0% 0% Age 1-nil, 2-mi. 3.mi. Median Age,Total 37.36 38.09 36,54 %Age 18+ 78.19% 78.15% 76.85% %.Age 554 27.73% 28,85% 27.6% %Age 654- 14.76% 1555% 14.86% Ethnicity i-mi. 2-rni. 3-mi. %White(2010 US Census, Not Hispanic/Latino) 91.43% 92.21% 90,99% % Black/African American (2010 US Census, Not HIspanic1Latino) 1.68% 1.32% 1.69% %American Indian &Alaska Native(2010 US Census, Not HispanIc/Latino) 1.64% 1.61% 1.46% %Asian(2010 US Census, Not HispaniclLatino) 1.65% 1.63% 2,11% %Native Hawaiian!Other Pacific Islander(2010 U5 Census, Not HispaniclLatino) 0.4% 0.26% 0.31% %Some other race(2010 US Census, Not Hispanic/Latino) 0,02% 0.05% 0.069/0 %Two or more races(201 0 US Census, Nor Hispanic/LatIno) 3.16% 2.92% 3.36% White(2010 US Census, Hispan-c1Latinc) 49.79% 52.03% 51.71% %Oiack/African American(2010 US Census, Hispanic/Latino) 2.52% 15% 1.54% %American Indian &Alaska Native(2010 US Census, Hispanic/Latino) 4.3% 4.59% 3.97% %Asian(2010 US Census, Hispanic/Latino) 0.61% 0,57% 056% • Native Hawaiian! Other Pacific Islander 12010 US Census, Hispanic/Latino) 0% 0.08% 0,23% %Some other rare(2010 US Census, Hispanic/Latino) 30.21% 27% 28,76% % Two or more races(2010 US Census,Hispanic/Latina) 12.58% 14.23% 13.23% White(Current Year, Not Hispanic/Latino) 90.4% 91,37% 89.91% • RIack/African American (Current Year, Not Hispanic/Latino) 1.95% 1.46% 1.89% American Indian&Alaska Native (CUrrent Year,Not Hispanic}Latino) 1.73% 1.7% 1.53% %Asian(Current Year, Not Hispanic/Latino) 1.85% 1,78% 2,3196 % Native Hawaiian/ Other Pacific Islander(Current Year, Not HispanicfLatirPoi 059% 0.39% 0.45% Some other race(CurrentYear, Not Hispanic/Latino) 0.02% 0.05% 0.08% % Two or more races(Current Year, Not Hispanic/Latino) 3.47% 3,2596 3,83% %White(Current Year), Hispanic/Latino 50.9% 52.56% 52.34% c Blaek/AfrIcan American (Current Year,Hispanic/Latino) .73% 1.11% 1.16% 96 American Indian &Alaska Nati (CUrrent Year, Hispanic/Latino) 4.46% 417% 4,14% Asian (Current Year,Hispanic/Latino) 0.46% 0.43% 0.42% 96 Native Ha'waiha.n! Other Pacific islander(Current Year, HlspanlcfLatino) 0% 0.06% 01 6% %Some other race (Current Year, Hispanic/Latino) 30.4% 27,25% 28.89% %Two or more races(Current Year, Hispanic/Latino) 12.04% 13.82% 12.9% %White(Five Year Projection, Not Hispanic/Latino) 89.5% 90.5% 88,87% % EilackJAfrican American (Five Year Projection, Not Hispanic/Latino) 2.02% 1,52% 1.98% %American Indian &Alaska Nath(Five Year Projection, Not Hispanic/Latino) 1,8% 1.78% 1,59% %Asian(Five Year Projection, Not Hispanic/Latino) 2.04% 1.95% 2.54% % Native Hawaiian? Other Pacific Islander(Five Year Projection, Not Hispanic/Latino) 0.6% 0.41% 0.48% % Same other race(Five Year Projection, Not Hispanic/Latino) 0.02% 0,05% 0,08% % Two or more races(Five Year Projection, Not Hispanic/Latino) 4.02% 3.79% 4.47% % White(Five Year Projection, Hispanic/Latino) 50.97% 52.53% 52.33% • BlackkAfrlcan American (Five Year Projection, Hispanic/Latino) 1,52% 0.96% 1.02% %American Indian&Alaska Native(Five Year Projection, Hispanic/Latino) 4.1 S% 4.5% 3.8S% % Asian (Five Year Projection, Hispanic/Latino) 0.4% 0.37% 0.35% %Native Hawaiian! Other Pacific Islander(five Year Projection, Hispanic/Latino) 0% 0,05% 014% %Some other race(Five Year Projection, Hispanic/Latino) 30.87% 27.5646 29.24% %Two or more races(Five Year Projection,Hispanic/Latino) 12.09% 14.03% 13,06% Housing & Households Housing and Households 1-mi. 2-m1, 3-M1. Land Area (Estimated Square Mules) 3.55 12.63 28.48 Total Housing Units(Current Year) 2,918 10,766 23,571 Total Households(Current Year) 2,766 10,286 22,504 Total Households(Five Year Projection) 2,778 10,497 23,215 Owner-Occupied: Owned with a mortgage or loan 1,107 4,132 9,215 Owner-Occupied: Owned free and clear 601 2.022 4,182 Reiter-Occupied 1,058 4,132 9:118 Housing Value (Current Year) 1-mi. 2-mi. 3-mi. Housing Value c $10,000 22, 912, 150 Housing Vale $10,000414,999 42 107 161 Housing Value $15,000-$19,999 61 125 199 Housing Value $20,300-$24,099 4? 90 123 Housing Value $25,000429,999 8 22 29 Housing Value$30,000-$34,999 2 3 12 Housing Value $35,000-$39,999 6 18 29 Housing Value $40,000-$49,999 21 64 88 Housing Value $50,000-$59,999 44 134 195 HausingValue $60,000469,999 29 89 159 Housing Value $70,000-$79,999 59 173 293 Housing Value $80,000-$89,999 82 254 455 Housing Value $90,0100-$99,999 59 209 451 Housing Value$100,000-$124,999 229 685 1,260 Housing Value $1250100-$149,999 196 745 1,495 Housing Value $15U,000-$174,999 195 743 1,511 Housing Value $175,0004199,999 169 602 1,363 Housing Value $200,000-$249,999 199 874 2,088 Housing Value $250,000-$299,999 103 519 1278 Housing Value $300,000-$399,999 81 345 955 Housing Value $400,000$499.999 26 121 450 Housing Value $500.000-$749,999 13 65 393 Housing Value $750,0004999,999 7 38 159 Housing Value $1,000.000 or more 10 31 90 Total Owner-occupied housing units(CCNU) 1,708 6,155 13,386 Income 1-mi, 2-mi. 3-mi. Per Capita Income(2010 US Census, based on Total Population) $21,008 $21,537 $22,716 Per Capita Income(Current Year, based on Taal Popuiatinr7) $23,808 $24,636 $26,170 Per Capita Income (Five Year Projection, based on Total Population) $26,338 $27,309 $29,146 Average(Mean)Household Income(Current Year) $52,148 $55,991 $62,445 Median Household Income (Current Year) $41,612 $43,503 $47,255 Households by Income (Current Year) 1-mi, 2-mi. 3-mi. % Household Income<$10,000 6.22% 7,15% 7.04% %Household Income$10,000,-$14,999 637% 6.37% 5.5% % Household Income$15,000-$19,999 5.75913 5,45% 4.82% % Household Income$20,000-$24,999 9.4% 7,15% 5,29% % Household Income$25,240$29.999 6.72% 6.41% 5.89% % Household Income$30,00c-$34,999 8.66% 8.62% 7,49% % Household Income$35,000439,999 4.92% 4.5% 5,31% %Household income$40,000-$44,999 6.23% 6.05% 5,44% %Household'Income$45,000-$49,999 5.28% 5.12% 4.79% %Household Income$50,000-$59,999 7.72% 7.97% 9,33% %Household Income$60,000-$74,999 12,8% 12,29% 11,58% % Household Income$75,000-$99,999 11.66% 11.92% 12,72% % Household income $' D0,00D-$124,999 4.85% 5,2% 5.87% 96 Household Income$125,000-$149,999 1.41% 2,5% 2.97 a % Household income$150.000-$199,999 0.79% 1,62% 2.57% % Household Income $200,000-$149999 0.569 0.49% 0,89% % Household Income $25Or000-$499,999 0.49% 0.93% 1.06% % Household Income $500,00+ Q.1 7% 0,116% 0.44% 2017 Caldwell 9enVer anal Estate 11C,dba Caldwell Ranker Cornme-dal ArfUat4s.MI Rl its Reserved.Colwell eanktr Mal l t ter LLt.dha CeIdwott Ranker Commer(lal Affilutos filly suppler;s the am cipres arthe Equal Opporeuntty Act_Eats Lae K INdependentiyOwned and Operated,Coldvreil6ar er Commercial and Om Coldv.el Ranker Commercial Logo are reglsce-edserrlce marlttawes dyCddrrBll Ranker Real Estate LIG dba Catderall Lianfce r Commuclal pffillates. sales reFrest nt KM,andloroker f resporeihre farcamplr verb any rams/mar dtirESiu'e Iral a•regulations 2015t20t7 Dem®grapl'ets wooded bi Experian through Alearya PO Box /: 4 Olson Engineering posfFalls, ID61&7'7 m J-41.52 o3elda0o ma0.corra TRIP GENERATION & DISTRIBUTION LETTER 622 N Park Rd,Spokane Valley,WA 99212 30-unit Cottage Housing Development This letter follows the outline forrnat of the City of Spokane Valley Street Standards Section 3.2.2—Minimum Elements [for Trip Generation & Distribution Letters]. a. Project description, including proposed use: A 30-unit, 55 and older, Cottage Housing development In the preliminary planning stages. This letter is being provided as additional information for the consideration of a Comprehensive Plan Amendment for the Subject Property that WGuld change zoning from Industrial to Residential. b.Site plan with vicinity map:There is no Site Plan at this time.See Vicinity Map below. c.1'EUl M i6 . % sone Trrrnirsnl UPS Spex,.ne 3rl,r:.)111a1 Millie School °44,4 r• llr�ndw7'�Piping 4122 Hirth pod;Rom IItWwLPlata " s x 2 n s L Wilily d j ch �+y parr,tlhtyslerherr, ` GLPSJohnson rel.! 5laraye of Spokane f ' `' ti. 2 c. Building size noted in square feet: Cottage homes will be approximately 600 to 800 square feet with one or two bedrooms. d. Zoning of the property: Zoning is currently Industrial.The Comprehensive Plan Amendment seeks to change the coning to Single-Family Residential Urban CR-3 . e.Determination of whether the project is to a 5EPA Infill Area:it's not. Page 1 of 3 f. Proposed and existing access points, site circulation, queuing lengths for driveways (and drive-throughs, if applicable) and parking locations: Referring to the parcel map below with the Subject Property highlighted In red, there is an existing access Point on the west side of the parcel onto Park Road and the property includes an internal circulation route for the Circle J Mobile Home Park under cvrnrnon ownership. The existing access point would be improved,and the internal circulation route severed or possibly retained for emergency use only. Dedicated parking will be provided for each home. More details will be known once the Site Pian is developed. ri Y TT IN 4'' --- E B r'_a a'id w ay Ave 1 ,� .,-,-z-----.7----:,. _..„.7, ,.� �� Y -a�. y T .. �. �._�.�- _ .. .11.E % v. f. �, lip .1in0 rte;. ' a 0 tint, ,411 ;, .y, ► Jr -fir lip fj . . ill � . . ' 's As E ;fI" f'Yr.. liff- yr .1v -.0 AV it rip, '4 7!It it . __ y, R i' - j .. 5 +L� ' 1 404. , fp of*ir p ii Imo.jtili ir, C16. III f 'a1 + � All ' ,- ii Ii ' Pl e t r , rte iii ` ; 1111 , 1 it i g,Project phasing and expected build out year:The project would likely be constructed in a single phase over a period of approximately S years. h.An estimate of trip generation for the typical weekday,AM peak-hour,and PM peak-hour conditions: There is no Land Use Code for cottage housing in the 10Th Edition of ITE's TO Generation Manual.The following table shows the Land Uses considered for this project and their relative trip generation rates. Land Use 22C—Multifamily Housing (Low-Rise) was selected as being most representative of a cottage housing project. Land Use 220 includes uses such as condorniniums, apartments, and town onne., It seems most representative because those uses, like cottage homes,are likely have 1 or 2 occupants as opposed to traditional single-family homes more suited to larger families. TRIP GENERATION RATES CODE TRIPS VS.. DE5CRI1?Ti0N _ WEEKDAY WEEKDAY AM WEEKDAY PM 210 1 DWELLING UNIT SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED HOUSING 9.44 0.76 1.00 214 2 RESIDENTS SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED HDUSING 530 0.42 0.56 220 i DWELLING UNIT MULTIFAMILY HOUSING (LOW-RISE) 732 0.56 l 0.67 240 1 DWELLING UNIT MOBILE HOME PARK 5.00 126 0.4.9 270 1 DWELLIi G UNIT RE5tOENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVI:LOPMVIENT 7.3e _ 0:58 _ 0.72 101h Edition Trip Generation Rates for Various Residential Land Uses Page 2 of 3 Applying the selected trip generation rate to a 30-dwelling unit project results in the following trip generation figures. _ TRIP GENERATION CODE DWELLING UNITS DESCRIPTION WEEKDAY TOTAL WEEKDAY AM WEEKDAY PM 220 30 MULTIFAMILY HOUSING(LOW-RISE) 220 17 _ 20 — Project Trip Generation Per the Trip Generation Manua)for Land Use 220, AM Peak Hour Trips split 284 Entering/72% Exiting and PM Peak Hour Trips split 59% Entering/41% Exiting. This results in the following Entering/Exiting Splits: AM ENTERIIVGT AM EXITING PM ENTERING PM EXITING 28% 72% 5D% 41% 5 12 12 8 Project Entering/Exiting Splits AM &PM Peak Hour i. A comparison of the trip generation between the previous and the proposed site tise for projects involving a change of use:Not applicable fora vacant site. j. A preliminary distribution pattern for traffic or the adjacent street network, shown in a graphical format: I speculate that traffic will he drawn approximately equally to/from the north (I-90) and south (Spokane Valley commercialcorridor).This results in the following estimated peak hour tam movements atthe Park Road access point. z(6) 6 4) Cl SITE ACCESS , 3 4) AM(Phi) PEAK HOUR ti Project Generated Peak Hour Turn Movements k.The engineering sea!signed and dated by the engineer who prepared the letter. w& `S' 34 44978 Ni 4C.,r sioNAIL c,-.‘' ion 8f 18 Page 3 of 3 EXHIBIT 2 Vicinity Map CPA-2018-0001 ! 1iii1[I11i Wad;i rd-s 1111111 EIvIi sionAve . l■1V1 11 I I.- 1■11■ E.Mis ion.Ave_ 11 1, 11111111x„ Ir ' .. w 8t� .�� 11M1 �`�1I !IIIg am ti Z 4: k-$Ynt. t� w rix' :11%.1[?;: ■ w S-... ri . � !!,� rj�"ai to71110mg.:41'4 � ! �, � w a = —ctco =I I. _ � ` - u. - - 11 F ■aMI ■ Eli 1 ■■ �.. Ii ■ Jill 1 III � E_S .,-.0_t�,e IA `� . ��v .,3ta�•Ave in �.[�•r —7-- � CY = �. M. � : --- ��:Mil III �- !_! . IMO g '*� I ;z ■ •■f ;r.. >~soarre_A aIiIIIJrAl N1 . -,, . ' ■I r 1111�PI1 1111 ■ :■ 1111 l�irrl ip ■ Eren r _ al ! ! rt E r mer .ve a alit. ■■11 _ MMI.MI m t M E r�]�srn lip, 1A met 1 q �_ • Centcr7nal I � 111 1•E1 a • I' . , co adldv� i�J fl•I 9-6-9ILi1111 Ill E D.Li AveE 91 'hff tIl S�ca:ttl S;n(fl X11 = �� F moi■ I wino. .j41 �!1 IC ■ ■M.E-NIaildn Z8� w cc . T 1 :Ir -'1 - J a - MIME , p ' . ---, Z� ■ I iit 14MI .�t■1N .1 111 1 MINI NMI roa xay 1----t" l b° �.rrrr _ t_ 1 _AM B .adwayAy [t II z Y r■r■Ir LL `s . � 11■N�■■�� ■■11■■��:'■ •�'�I !IIL iI'I !___ Ll �z P !.. .■1r _■■P �- Fnn:a WI. = bi A��k� ` lm; mane 4 nods ■■1 lli -Iki !ti♦.11 u�1..■ •I : _E Al _ � :4'. �i1N1'ti�.�0 IJw 14.iiF 7,vr v16,1" NI ■e, 12-11 �t/4. Ui. ! IiuI1m1r Cit�Stl�nol a;■�� E Vall I 1 �II, ■ •EIA 1'r E on e ■1�I ®i1 !! '1■It .11■IN F �.1 II11 _ II' __ 2 ��.. rim ■ : ■ i C in_A� ' i 0 •�rrrr 3 �� w g ■ a E. nin.A.. d ommi.u11� y1111 .1.'1 EiMai Ave ■11 - ON i Y minim aePy'Ai �'■r■r �1 11111 W 9 ,z moil E'•I, ersid Ave 1 2S , nisi Li 1.1� �� .-��■! S.ra ue ,ve m- �1, vommi. NE 1st L y.. x 4 I M 1■■ F p 11111 inn ILII �� a 1�1�� ■I .h� �- �.1 A a�llUII ,. ■ :n _ ...... n 1mmenfan ... ■ tt MI 1101b6 \.. _ [" i1M1 6717.-.1.5 _11111111 I G1 11 ., V 11 7... r� �^ �{11111 rl 1111111111 ....-:6.1_.3 z Appleway :IKd 1.11 — ' ._ �111e . it W h E111I i'r_,so'tt 1111M1i Ali- �IM11 �` +. 1■ um Elcntentnrv' 11111" 1111 c.1..,I' 1•• r.av_ 1i i mum' 1fi.1i riiii ,.:i,t. rk '1 III " ■1111111. 11111111■1 tilij_j 11 L I■ Hill,it;, .-., ', MIA , • ,111■1111■ ■_ _. wsia Ax II L1 I HUM UM 1.i i,..,.l.i, -A` . •••il1 Ae,��■FI' ------ 0 0.25 0.5 1 EXHIBIT 3 Comprehensive Plan MapRua al IN al 1110111111111111111 _ ' 1111 O rA Study Area E iiraadwa 1 -. 11111 "— Vnitt %lk Ave_ I - - CPA-2019-0001 Request: l kerne Owner: penny Davit, circle J ori i7t ry initialrop s l to ch rrc�e tie Horne Perk,LLC laird USG ciestgnal/ori from 1 to SFR Valley Rercel#; 45103,9059 and 70t?irlj from t to R-3 Address: 622 N Park Rd EXHIBIT 4 Zoning MEte a { Study Area Broadway A 1 - _ v • ti CPA-2019-0001 I Nest: I" Owner Dprul�r�7atifs, e ; Prrva#e�y affiliated propose(to change O e rot,iI HQIT Pyr, LW land use do srgn ttlon from I to SFR Permit 5183,g059 5 . 11 9 and zoning from!to R-. - Address: 622 N Park Fid — EXHIBIT 5 FIFA SEPA CI. KLIST PRane SVC 21,20 10210 E Sprague Avenue ♦ Spokane Valley WA 9' '5 [hone: (504),720-5240 4 Fax:(309)720-5075 i 2t rstititcepAcr:c%sti�c�k:tnew.tlle I$FLUSL 011.Y. - Date Submitted: Received by: Fee. PLUS #: 'File#: (1r4– ° — PART! — REQUIRED MATERIAL 'ATHE APPLICATION WILL NOT 8E ACCEPTED IF THE REQUIRED MATERIALS ARE NOT PROVIbED" 0 Completed SEPA Checklist L] Application Fee El Reduced Site Plan of proposal in S1/'P by 11" or 11" by 17" size El Trip Distribution and Generation Letter,if requested by Development Engineering. PURPOSEeilliELLEELIFSILGISlaZ The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement(EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide Information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, If it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an E15 is required. atElitleILOLLSIELAEPAElanal This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal, Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known,or give the best description you can. • You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge, In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your oWn observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. if you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write"do not know" or"does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations. such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions If you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects, The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you toexplain your answers or provide additional Information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. VSE OF cHE.C.KLUST_FON-PfiQJUT PROPOngLs; Complete this checklist for eon-project proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not appty," IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NON-PROJECT ACTIONS(Part D). PL-22 V1,0 Page 1 nF p Win, SEPA CHECKLIST' .000Vall . For non-project actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal" "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable None 2, Name of applicant: Danny Davis of CircteJ Mobile Home Park LLC 3, Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: 3580 N. Gunnar Court. Coeur D'Alene ID 83015 2084914003 4. Date checklist prepared. 9/25118 5. Agency requesting checklist: Planning and zoning 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): October 31Pt submittal for comprehensive plan amendment. 7_ Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? if yes, explain_ The current intent is to apply for the rezone down to residential to allow the construction of a cottage style development for people 55 and older. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. NIA 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known_ NIA 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are severat questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal You do not need to repeat those answers on this page, (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) ltatent is to change the 2.7 acres neighboring our 55 and older Mobile Home Community from industrial to Residential. This will allow ownership to have a uniform usage for the property we own between Ella Road and Park Road. PL-22 V1.0 Page 2 of SESEMGt CHECKLIST Sn 12. Location of the proposal_ Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any. and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the sites). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist, 62211, Park Road, Spokane Valley WA 99212 Parcel#45183.9059 13. Does the proposed action lie within the Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA)?Yes The general Sewer Service Area?Yes Priority Sewer Service Area? No (See: Spokane Ccunty's ASA Overlay zone Atlas for boundaries). 14. The following questions supplement Part A, a. Critical Aquifer Recharge Area (CARA) !Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA). 1. Describe any systems, other than those designed for the disposal of sanitary waste, installed for the purpose of discharging fluids below the ground surface (includes systems such as those for the disposal of Stormwater or drainage from floor drains). Describe the type of system, the amount of material to be disposed of through the system and the types of material likely to be disposed of (including materials which may enter the system inadvertently through spills or as a result of firefighting activities), There would most likely be storm water basinsldry wells. Swaim. Nothing else. Exact amounts are unknown 2. Will any chemicals (especially organic solvents or petroleum fuels) be stored in aboveground or underground storage tanks? If so, what types and quantities of material will be stored? 3. What protective measures will be taken to insure that leaks or spills of any chemicals stored or used on site will not be allowed to percolate to groundwater? This includes measures to keep chemicals out of disposal systems. Not applicable 4. Will any chemicals be stored, handled or used on the site in a location where a spill or leak will drain to surface or groundwater or to a Storrnwater disposal system discharging to surface or groundwater? No PL-22 V1Page 3 of ane SEPA CHECKLIST 49000 Malley b. Stormwater What are the depths on the site to groundwater and to bedrock (if known)? Unknown,but unlikely 2. Will stormwater be discharged into the ground? if so, describe any potential impacts. Probably, and not impact other than what is typical for residential projects. B. ENVIRONN1ENTALELEMENTS EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY '1) Earth a. General description of the site (check one): /flat, E rolling, ❑ hilly. [� steep slopes, ❑ mountainous, ether Flat b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percentslope)? Perhaps a 1T slope towards the southern property line. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland_ Top soil. Perhaps some gravel. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed, Also indicate source of fill. Grading work has already been completed years ago. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Nothing significant or unusual g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Approximately 80%.Final designs are not complete. PL-2 VtO Page 4 of 4515liane SEPA CHECKLIST . J1e ' t1, Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Standard site disturbance measures where applicable. EVALUATION FOR 2) Air AGENCY USE ONLY a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wcod smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Not Applicable b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? Not Applicable If so, generally describe. c_ Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Not Applicable 3) Water a, Surface, 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. No 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? if yes, please describe and attach available plans. No 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. Not Applicable 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions' Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. Not Applicable PL-22 VI C Page 5 of pk SEPA CHECKLIST EVALUATION FOR AGENCY Usu ONLY 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? No If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Yes Give general description, purpose. and approximate quantities if known. Existing well will be utilized for irrigation 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, it any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals; agricultural; etc.)_ Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the systerr(s) are expected to serve Not Applicable c_ Water runoff (including stormwater): 1) Describe the source cf runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? No Applicable at this time. SII this water flow into other waters? If so, describe 2) Could waste materiats enter ground or surface waters? No If so. generally describe, Project will be serviced by sanitary sewer. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground. and runoff water impacts, if any: Storm water will be controlled and contained with drywells and swales where necessary. PL-,22 V1 0 Page 6 of {�'�'" SEPA CHECKLIST piikae , ' aIle . EVALUATION FOR 4) Plants AGENCY USE ONLY a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: n deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other i❑ ergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other hrubs grass Q pasture 0 crop or grain ❑ wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulirush, skunk cabbage, other mater plants: water lily, eelgrass, miffed, other MJ other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation wili be removed araltered? Maybe 7-10 small trees on the property.Would try to keep as many as possible c. List threatened or eridangered species known to be on or near the site, None d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Bushes,trees, and plants would be planted along the borders of the property to privatize the community,enhance the environment,and provide a natural buffer.There will be interior landscaping and planting,but that Is yet to be designed. 5) Animals a Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: © birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: ❑ mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: ® fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.None c. is the site part of a migration route? No If so, explain. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: increased landscaping would support birds and small mammals. PL-22 V1.O Page 7 of EPA CHECKLIST 6). Energy and natural resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood slave, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing,etc. Electricity and natural gas will service any residences on the property b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe, No c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Not Applicable 7) Environmental health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? if so, describe No 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Fire, Medlcallambulance,and police are commonly required in residential neighborhoods 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: None b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Noise from neighboring industrial users from their physical site as well as their truck traffic generated on Park and Ella Road. Key aspect of our project will be to provide spacing and natural buffers (Including fencing)(rani Park Road and adjacent properties.zoned Industrial_ After owning the Circle J MHP for over 5 years,we know that the noise generated from the physical site of our neighboring Industrial users does not generate complaints. it's for that reason we believe it to he a non-issue. PL-22 Vi,[) Page 8 of C-411.111 p pane sEMELIVablir , Valle AGENOY USE ONLY 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. in the short term the only noise would be with the construction of a residential project in general. In the long term you can expect increased traffic from the hours of Gam through 9pm from the residents. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: We do not believe there is a need for long term efforts In noise reduction for a project such as this. 8). Land and shoreline use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Vacant and industrial b. Has the site been used for agriculture? if so, describe. No. c. Describe any structures on the site. Existing well"pit"for the irrigation well servicing the Circle J Mobile Home Park d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? The well "pit" either needs to he improved or removed and replaced with a pump house. Final determination there has not been made. e, What is the current zoning classification of the site? Industrial f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Industrial g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Unknown h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. Not to my knowledge 1. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Approximately 3U to 60 individuals depending on family composition. PL-22 Vi,4 Page 9 of Wham ._ SEPA CHECKLIST 4000 Valle `. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? Zero k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: Not Applicable L Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any. A residential development on this site would be much more compatible with the neighboring usage of a 55 and older mobile home park_Establish buffers(landscapingifencingispacingPect)for Park.Road and the Southern boundary adjacent to future industrial users to increase compatibility. PL-22 V1.0 I}acge10 of `pOkane 1 CHECKLIST Valley. 9) Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether nigh, middle, or low-income housing. Approximately 30 middle income units. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any- Not Applicable 10). Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas: what is the principal exterior building materials) proposed? No more than two story homes_ Cottage style units would be stick built on small crawl spaces. Vynal siding is likely, but Hardtplank style siding world be preferable depending on budgetary restrictions. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Norte ce Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: I don't foresee any negative aesthetic impacts of this type of project. Quite the contrary. 11). Light and glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Only the typical lighting seen from houses. There is a chance we might do some street lighting in the courtyards and streets, but it would be more accent lighting than "glaring" b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None to my knowledge PL-22 V1.0 Page 10 of 14 `pile SEPA CHECKLIST 4000Valley' EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY 12) Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? None to my knowledge b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? if so, describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: We might build a small dog park within the community. 13). Historic and cultural preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? if so, generally describe. No. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to thesite. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: Not Applicable 14). Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Easy access off the Broadway exit onto Park Road. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? No, and unknown, G. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? Exact number is currently unknown at this time. However,we have a design goal to produce atleast two covered parking spots per home, and one half parking spot per home for guest parking.No parking spaces will be eliminated. PL-22 V1.D Page 11 cl Spokane SEPA CHECKLIST 'a .1ey d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). EVALUATION FOR The community itself will require it's own roads. Any alterations to Park AGENCY USE ONLY Road are unknown. e, Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. Na f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If Known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. See traffic letter. g. Proposed measures to reduce or central transportation impacts, if any: None appear to be necessary at this time. 15) Public services a Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, sch❑o.ls, other)? If so, generally describe. It is typical for residential developments to require services from police, fire protection, and health care. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None appear to be necessary at this time. 16) Utilities a. Check ilities cu ntly available at t site: e ctricity, ii natural gas, water, Irefuse service, telephone, A sanitary sewer, ❑ septic system, ❑ other- describe b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed, The local water district will provide domestic water for consumption.1Ne will utilize sanitory sewer,and we will use our own well to generate irrigation water. C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge 1 understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make it Jdeei.'•R. - Signature, - - PL.22 V1.0 Page 12 of + lio ne SEPA Ci-IECKLIST lye Date Op Submitted; D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NON-PROJECT ACTIONS (Do not use this sheet for„project actions) Because these questions are very general, it relay be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activitieslikely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? Not applicable, a. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are' 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? Not applicable a. Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: 3, How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Energy and resource draw will be in the vein of other residential developments. a Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: 4, How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? No affect. a. Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: 5. t-low would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible With existing plans? No affect PL-22 Vi.0 Page 13 of *Alone SEM CHECKLIST alley, a. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts Are Not Applicable 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? Very much in the vein of what any other residential project might have. a. Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such dernand(s) are: None appear to be needed at this time. 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws €tir requirements for the protection of the environment. None E. SIGNATURE t, the undersigned, swear under penalty of perjury that the above responses are made truthfully and to the best of my knowledge. I also understand that, should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part, the agency may withdraw any Determination of Nonsignificance that it might issue in reliance upon this check list, -" Date: 0/2 Vi? Signature: l Please print or type: Proponent: 1 '74Vr Address: 3§870 C oit 7 e or + 1i/1# 1-17 c l r Phone: 619 -1?"-- 6043 Person completing form (if different from proponent): Name: Address: Phone: PL.-22 V1.0 Page 14 of EXHIBIT 6 - - COMMUNITY & PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SjiÔkane DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE Valley 40000 10210 East Sprague Avenue• Spokane Valley WA 99204 5D9.720,5000• Fax: 509.720.5075 • planning(r po]canevalley.org FILE NUMBER: CPA-2019-00'01 PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: Request to change the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation from Industrial (I)to Single Family Residential (SFR)and to change the Zoning District from Industrial(1) to Single Family Residential Urban(R-3) APPLICANTIOW 1ER: Danny Davis, Circle 3 Mobile Home Park, LLC, 3580 North Gunnar Court; Coeur 1 'Alene, ID 83815 OWNER: Sue S.Garcia Family Limited Partnership, 1693 Eureka Road, Suite 300, Roseville, CA 95661 PROPOSAL LOCATION: Parcel number 45183.9059, addressed as 622 North Park Road, located 300 feet south of the intersection of Park Road and Broadway Avenue, further located in the SW rV of Section 18, Township 2.5 North, Range 44 East, Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washington LEAD AGENCY: City of Spokane Valley Pursuant to Title 21 (Environmental Controls) of the SVIviC, the lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement(E1S) is not rewired under RCW 43.21 C.030(2)(c). This decision Was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request, DETERMINATION: This DNS is issued under WAC 197-111-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date issued. Comments must be received by 5:(W p.m.on February 22, 2019. STAFF CONTACT: Karen Kendall,Planner,City of Spokane Valley Community and Public Works Department, 1021+0 East Sprague Avenue, Spokane Valley, WA 99206, 1>H; (509)720-50261FX(509) 720-5075, kkerniallrt]spokunevai RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: Lori Barlow,AICD,Senior Planner, City of Spokane Valley Community and Public Works Department, 10210 East Sprague Mentte,Spokane Valley,WA 99206,PH:(509)720- 5335TFX (509)720-5075, 1.liarlo tai+sps 7atic ai °.c DATE ISSUED: February 8,2019 SIGNATURE: r` 4 I LI GGA APPEAL: An appeal of this determination shall,he submitted to the Corpmunity& Public Works Department within fourteen(14)calendar days after the date issued, The appeal must be written and specific factual objections made to the City's threshold determination. Appeals shall be conducted in conformance with Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) 1790 Appeals,and any required fees pursuant to the City's adopted Fee Schedule shall be paid at the time of appeal submittal. Pursuant to WAC 197-11-680,appeals shall be limited to a review of a final threshold determination. City of Spokane Valley February S,2019 peteieiination or Noa•SigeiFicance(DNS) Page of 'Elk No.CPA-2019-0001 EXHIBIT 7 COMMUNITY & PUBLIC WORKS DEPA1 `CME 'P Sit v nF. BU1LDINC & PE,. NNING DIVISIO CSpo it v n NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ]02.10 E Sprague Ave •Spokane Valley WA 99206 509.720.5240 a Fax: 509:720.507.5 • planning r -pakanevalley,org Date of Notice: February 13, 2019 Pursuant to Spokane Valley Municipal Code(SVMC) 17.80.120, Notice of Public Hearing, the Building &Planning Division is sending notice to all property owners within 800 feet of the subject property. Public Hearing Date and Time: February 28,2019,beginning at 6:D8 p.m. Hearing Location: Spokane Valley City Council Chambers, City Hall I Project Number: i. DCPA-2019-4001 I Application Description: Request to change the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation from Industrial (I)to Single Family Residential (SFR) and to change the Zoning District from Industrial (I)to Single Family Residential Urban (R.-3) Location: Parcel number 45183.9059; addressed as 622 North Park Road,located 300 feet south of the intersection of Park Road and Broadway Avenue, further located in the SW V4 of Section CS,Township 25 North,Range 44 East, Willamette Meridian,Spokane County, Washington Owner/Applicant: Danny Davis, Circle I Mobile Home Park, LLC, 3580 North Gunnar Court,Coeur D'A1ene, ID 83815 Owner: Sue S. Garcia Family Limited Partnership, 1693 Eureka Road, Suite 300, Roseville, CA 95661 Date of Application: October 24, 2018 Stuff Contact: Karen Kendall,Planner Hearing Procedures: The Spokane Valley Planning Commission will conduct the hearing pursuant to the Planning Commission rules of procedure, Interested persons may testify at the public hearing and may submit written comments and documents before or at the hearing. The Planning Commission may limit the time given to speakers. The Planning Commission will forward a recommendation on the request to the Spokane Valley City Council. NOTICE: Individuals planning to attend the meeting who require special assistance to accommodate physical, hearing, or other impairments, please contact the City Clerk at (509) 720-5000 as soar: es possible so that arrangements may be made. A staff report will be available for inspection seven (7) calendar days before the hearing at the Community & Public Works Department, located at the Spokane Valley City Hall, 10210 East Sprague Avenue, between 8:00 am and 5:00 pm, Monday-Friday, excluding holidays. Send written comments to the Spokane Valley Community&Public Works Department. EXHIBIT 8 Karen Kendall From: Chad Riggs Sent: Wednesday, January 9, 2C19 3'13 AM To: Karen Kendall Cc: Ray Wright Subject: RE; Request fur Comments- CPA-2019-0091 , � . , _ :I,.- --i-mtlerits for CP \ .Lc __a ,I.,.i+!.. _I""..'�i r'i-, 11'i•r i 7'�i [ c( 'Iirrill ei, T 11 17.i1=ess'.I'f. 19p4 +fOIi, 1-1 -4r1 -+ tj - _ n r C . = I: i I I. „ ,. I I I.y ' a Se r %14 e'.r., r{ 51i.}.ktati�tra iti t r+_ I Irl srt ii Val ley From:Karen Kendall Sent:Thursday,January 3, 2019 11:59 AM To.'Central Valley School District 4356' <jrowellicvsd.orp; 'CenturyLink' <Karen.Stoddard@centurylink.com>; 'Chris Johnston"<crjoh nston@spokanesheriff.org>; 'Chris Knudson' <CKnudson@spokanecounty,org'; 'Christina Janssen (City of Millwood"<planningrnillwoodwa.us>; 'Cindy Anderson'<cyan461@ecy.wa.gov>; 'City of Spokane Tirrell Black' <tblack@spokanecty.org'; 'Colin pepner' <CDERNERlaspokanecounty.org>i 'Comcast' <bryan_richardson@cahie.corncast.corn>; "Consolidated Irrigation District#19' <consclidatedirrigatior ecmcast,net>; 'East Spokane Water District#1' <distlJa comcast.net'; 'East Valley School District#361'<smithLo@evsd org>; 'inland Power& Light'<connien@inlandpower.com>; 'Jacob McCann'<Jrrnca4b1@ecy.wa.gov>; Mike Stone <mstone@spokanevalley.org>; 'Modern Electric Water Company'<mndernrrnewco.com>; 'Patncde, Brian (PARKS' <Brian.Patrrode@PARKS,WA.COV>; Ray Wright<rwright@spokaneualley.orp;'; 'Spokane Aquifer Joint Board' <info@spakkaneaquifer.org>; 'Spokane County Planning&Building'<jpederson@a spokanecounty.org';'Spokane County Water District#3'<scwd3@corncast.riet'; 'Spokane Regional Clean Air Agency' <awestby@spokanecleanair.org>; 'Spokane Regional Health District' <psavage@srhd,crg'; 'Spokane Regional Transportation Council' <rstewart@SRTC.org>; 'Spokane Transit Authority' <kotterstrom@spokanetransit.com>; 'Spokane Tribe of Indians' <randya@spokanetribe.com>; 'Traci Harvey,Spokane Valley Lire Dept No_ 1'<HarveyT@spokanevalleyfire.cam>; 'Vera Water& power'<kwells@verawaterandpower.com>; 'WA Commerce'<reviewtearrlpcamrnerce.wa.gov>; 'WA Dept of Arch and Hist Preservation'<Gretclhen.Kaehler@DAHP.wa,gov>; 'WA Ecology,Olympia' <se paunit@ecy.wa.gov>; 'WA Fish&Wildlife'<SFPAdesk@dfw.wa.gov›; 'WA Natural Resources' <northeast.regian@dnr.wa.gov>; 'WA Parks' <Chris.guidottiaparks-wa.gov>; 'WA Transportation' <FiggC@wsdot.wa,gov>; 'Spokane Valley Fire Department' <inspections spckanevalleyfire.com'; 'Chris Wafstet, ECOW'<cwafstet@mewco.com>; 'Hutchinsonidl€a'@gwestoffice.net';'Larry.a.ostwaldip66,com'; 'irvinwater@ windwireless.net';. "leslie.king@n dfw,wa.gov';Chad Riggs<criggs@spokanet+alley.org>;Jenny Nickerson<jnickersan@spokanevalley,org>; Lori Barlow<lbarIow@spokanevailey.org);Mike Basinger<mbasinger@spukanevalley+.org>;Chaz Bates <cbates@spokanevalley.org>; Michael Froemming<mfraemming spokanevalley.org>; 'mlong@scldB.org'; 'orchardave irrigationdist6@corncast.net'; 'tirnothy.morgan@wusd_org; 'rick@nnodirr.arg'; 'info@ madirr.org'; 1 Ikey@Ilibertylakewa.gov' Subject: Request for Comments- CPA-2019-0001 Please review the attached Environmental Checklist and associated materials for the following project: Project Name: Park Road Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment File #: CPA-2019-0001 Parcel:45483,9059 If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Pest regards, Karen Kendall I Planner J.0210 E.Sprague Avenue I Spokane Valley,WA 99206 (509) 720-5026 Ih tr:ndall wcltanevalllev.atc "pane Valley This email ancs any attachments may be subject to disclosure pursuant to Washington State's Pu bile Record Act,chapter 42.56 RCW. 2 Karen Kendall From: Ray Wright sent: Thursday, January 17, 2019 9:26 AM To: Karen Kendall Cc: Chad Riggs Subject: FSE: Request for Comments - CPA-2019-0001 Karen- As oLltlirt,26 Anti est=tbIFslied in tlr . pFicant's Tr i)Celi rat'roti Distribution Lett'yr. tito traffic impacts as a :e laic of this comp plan change would be beim,.. el.e thresh ld votuir ps for requiring aclditiannl trek+r ;turfy The city li«s area; infrastrticn ire and capacity iii-place to strppoet this C . f1100. Ifo'' Ray Writ,--m,: P E Sect/4r Engin -2 r, Traffic Val ley 10210 E. Sprague Ave, Spokane Valley, WA 99206 rwrr'chtW ohonevoilev.taro (509) 72,0-501c. From: Karen Kendall Sent: Thursday, January 3, 20,19 11:59 AM To:'Central Valley School District#356' ejrowell@cvsd.org>; 'CenturyLink' <Karen..Stoddard@centurylink.corn>; 'Chris Johnston'<crjohnston@spokanesheri#f.org>, 'Chris Knudson'<CKnudsar, spakanetounty.org>; 'ChristinaJansserr (City of Millwood' <planning@miilwoodwa.us> 'Cindy Anderson'<cyan461@ecy.wa.gov>; 'City of Spokane Tirrell slack' <tblack ►spokanecityr.org>; 'Colin Depner' <CDEPNER@spokanecounty.org>; 'Comcast' <bryan_richardson@cable.cornca5t.conn>; 'Consolidated Irrigation District#19`<consolidatedirrigationc'comcast.net>; 'East Spokane Water District#l'<distl@comcast.net>, 'East Valley School District#361'<srnithLO@evsd.crp; 'Inland Power& Light' <cannier inlandpower.ccm>; 'Jacob McCann' CJrnca451@ecy.wa.gov>; Mike Stone <mstone@spokanevalley.org>; 'Modern Electric Water Company' <madern@rnewca.corn>; 'Patnade, Brian (PARKS' <Brian.Patnnde@PARKS,WA.GOV>; Ray Wright<rwright@spokanevalley.org>; 'Spokane Aquifer Joint Board' <info@spokaneaquifer.orp; 'Spokane County Planning & Ruilt$ing'<jpederson@spokanecounty.org>; 'Spokane County Water District*3'<scwd3@cnmca5t.net>; 'Spokane Regional Clean Air Agency' <awestby@spokanecleanair.org.; 'Spokane Regional Health District'<psavage@ srhd.org>; 'Spokane Regional Transportation Council' <rstewart@SRTC.org>; 'Spokane Transit Authority' <kotterstrom spokanetranSitcom>; 'Spokane Tribe of Indians' <randya@spokanetribecam>; 'Traci Harvey, Spokane Valley Fire Dept No. t' <HarveyT spokanevalleytlre.corn>; 'Vera Water& Power'<kwells@verawaterandpower.cotrt>; 'WA Commerce'<reviewtearncomrnerce.wa.gov>; 'WA Dept c Arch and Hist Preservation'<Gretchen°Kaehie r@OAHP.wa.gov>; 'WA Ecology, Olympia'<sepaurtit ecy.wa.gov>; 'WA Fish &1Nildiife' <SEPAdesk +dfw.wa.gov); 'WA Natural Resources' <northeast,region@dnr.wa.gov>; 'WA Parks' <Chris.guidotti1parks.wa.gov); 'WA Transportation' <FiggG@wsdot.wa.gov>, 'Spokane Valley Fire Department' <inspections@spokanevailey€ire.com>; 'Chris Wafstet, MECOW'<cwafstet@rnewco,com>; 1 "Fl utchinsonid16@gwestoffice,net°; 'Larry.e.ostwaId +a p 5.com; 'irvinwater @windvrireless.net"; 'Ieslie.kirr8@dfw.wa.gov'; Chad Riggs<criggs@spokanevaliey.org>;Jenny Nickerson .jnickerson spakanevalley.org>; Lnrr Barlow<lbarlow@spokanevalley.org>; Mike Basinger<rnbasinger@spokanevalley.org>; Chu sates ates@spokanevaliey.erg>; Michael Froemrning<mfroemming@a spokanevalley.org>; 'mlong@scfd8.org', 'crchardaveirrigationdist6@a comcast.net'; 'tirothy.morgan@wvsd.org'; 'rick@modirr.arg'; 'info@modirr.org'; Ikey@libertylakewa.go i' Subject; Request for Comments- CPA-2019-0001 AU, Please review the attached Environmental Checklist and associated materials for the fallowing project: Project Name: Park Road Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment File #: CPA-2019-0001 Parcel: 45483.9059 If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Best regards, Daren Kendall I Planner 10210 C.Sprague Avenue I Spokane Valley,WA 99206 (509)720-5026 i kkerti ialle5uokanevalley erg `poae .0050 Valley email and any attachments may be subject to disclosure pursuant Ifl Washington State's Public Record AO,'chapter 42.56 RCW. • • • 2 Karen Kendal From: Blanchette,Jake <BlanchetteJ@SpokaneValleyFire.com> Sent: Wednesday,January 9,201912;18 PM To: Karen Kendall Subject: FW: Request for Cemrrrents - CPA-2019-KM Attachments: CPA-2019-0DD1 Kendall.peif Review letter attached. Thanks, Jake Blanchette Spokane Valley Fire Depart!nem {509)892-4121. From:Andersen, Patricia On Behalf Of Inspections Sent:Thursday,January 3,2019 12:19 PM To: Harvey,Traci <HarveyT SpnkaneValleyFire_corn>; Blanchette,Jake <BlanchetteJ 1)e SpokaneValleyFire.com> Subject: FW: Request for Comments- CPA-2019-0001 From: Karen Kendalljrnailto:kkenriallPsrankanevaliey:rargl Sent:Thursday,January 03,2019 11:59 AM To:'Central Valley School District#1356'<jrawell+ cvsd.or'>; `CenturyLink`<Karen.Stoddard@centurylink,corn›;'Chris Johnston' <crinhnston asnokanesnerifF.ore>; 'Chris Knudson' <CKnudson ispokanecaunty.org›; 'Christina Janssen (City of Millwood'<j nnirrgPrnillwoadwa.us›; 'Cindy Anderson'<cvan461@ecy.wa.eav>; 'City of Spokane Tirrell Black' <tblack sprikanecity.c rg›;'Cohn Depnek'<CDEPI ER[soak.araecour,tv.ore›;'Comcast' <L) an rithardson cable.camcast,corn>;Consolidated Irrigation District 419<corasclidatedirriaativnGa7c�rneast.oat>; 'East Spokane Water District#1'<distl@comcastnet>; 'East Valley School District f#361'<smithLO evsd.are›; 'Inland Power&Light'<canriien@inlandoower,corn›;'Jacob McCann'<Jmca451@ecy.wa. €av>; Mike Stone <mstane@spcikanevalley.o g>;Modern Electric Water Co.<moderr Pmewco.corrn>; 'Patriode, Brian (PARKS' <Brian.Patnode PARKS.WA.G V); Ray Wright<rwright@spokanevaIley.org›; 'Spokane Aquifer Joint Board' <infoi sopkanea 0er.or ›; 'Spokane County Planning& Building'<jpedersan@s rokaiter.nuntv.org›;'Spokane County Water District#3'<scwd3@coomcast net>; 'Spokane Regional Clean Air Agency'<awestbv@spo anecleanair.ore>; 'Spokane Regional Health District'<psavagel�5rhei.ort?›;'Spokane Regional Transportation Council' <rstewart SRTC.crp; 'Spokane Transit Authority'<1.otterstrom@spokaretransit.scorn>;'Spokane Tribe of Inclians' <randyaa spcakanetribe.corn>;Harvey,Traci<Ha.-vey'T@SpokaneValleyFire.com›; 'Vera Water& Power' <kwells verawaterandpower.corn.; 'WA Commerce'<reviewteam carnmerce_wa.eov>; 'WA Dept of Arch and Hist Preservation'<Gretc hen.KaehlerPDAHP.wa.gov>;'WA Ecology,Olympia'<sepaunit@ecv_wa cr,v>; 'WA Fish&Wildlife' <SEPAdesk@tlfw.wa.gov>; 'WA Natural Resources'<noraleast.re ionednr,wa.gav>; WA Parks' <Chris.au dott Pparks.wray>;'WA Transportation' <FigR.G@wsdot.wa.eov>; inspections <Inspections Spokane'u`alieyFire.com›; 'Chris Wafstet, MECOW'<cwafstet(r rnewco:com>; 'Hutchinsanid16@gwestoffice.net'; 'Larry.e.ostwald@p56.com; 'irwinwater@udindwireless.net'; 'leslie.king@dfw.wa.gow';Chad Riggs<cri srmspokanevaiiev.org>;Jenny Nickerson<jnickerson@spokanevalley.or;, ; Lori Barlow<dbarlowPspokaneaallev.org>; Mike Basinger<rnhasingerff spokaneva I ley.org>; Chaz Bates <chatesgspokanevallev,org>; Michael Froemming<mfrneinrning +lspokanevalley.or >; 'mlong sc#d1i.org'; 'orchardaveirrigationdistgl comcast_r et'; 'timothy_morgan@wvsd.org', 'info@Iinodirr.org'; Ikey@llibertylakewa.gov` Subject: Request for Comments-CPA-2019-1)001 l All, cl1c1ase review the attached Environmental Checklist and associated materials for the following project: Project Name: Park Road Comprehensive Plan MapAmendrnent Fide #:CPA-2019-0001 Parcel; 45483.9059 if you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Best regards, Karen Kendall I Planner 10210 E.Sprague Avenue I Spok,sne Valley,WA 09206 (509)720-5026 I kkendgIl srial nevalley,org Sifolalle Valley. This email and any attachments may be subject to disclosure pursuant to Washington State's Public Renard Mt,chapter 42.56RM. z Pursuing Excellence 4T t B1a n1v cou.rr's, FIRE CHi1u fuDEP,' 7 6; � 2120 N.Wilbur Spa kaneValley,WA 9920€ (509)928-1 700 Main January 9, 2019 (509¢.892-,1125 Fax spolianevalleyfire.com City of Spokane Valley 13210 E. Sprague Avenue Spokane Valley,WA 99206 RP- CPA-2019-0001 622 N Park Technical Review Comments The Spokane'Valley Fire Department has completed the review for the above referenced project and has no comments on the SEPA checklist. Specific fire department requirements shall be conditioned on future permits. If there are any questions please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, Jacob Blanchette Environmental Engineer Spokane Valley Fire Department Karen Kendall m: Anderson, Cindy (ELY) <CYAN461 ECY.WA.GL V> Sent: Wednesday,January 16, 2019 10:48 AM To: Karen Kendall Subject: ECOLOGY COMMENTS: 201900021 Park Road Comprehensive Plan Amendment (K Kendall) Attachments: (Kendall, K)201900021.pdf Hello; Ecology submits the attached comments. If you have any questions, pease 4et me know. If cannot answer your question I will either research the answer or direct you to the appropriate person to help you. Thank you. j.h.t Cindy Anderson S.E.P: Planner SEA ,ERO ! Dew, of EcoIi. y l 5°9.329.3442 phoria [mail: Cindy-Anderson e+v.ua, 'no _ Please note: This communication is public record and may be subject to disclosure as per the Washington State Public Records Act, RCW 1 �4fr K �.1 f..es~ fel .rtiN M1 STA7r OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY 46rlt N . orin+r, 57rzof • Wls,tm. LI iiirigiw! 9920742 " J70911'241-?-ifibt January 16,2019 Ms. Karen Kendall Planner City of Spokane Valley 10210 E. Sprague Ave. Spokane Valley, WA 99206 Re: Park Road Comprehensive Plan Amendment, File# CPA-2019-f}O01 Dear Ms. Kendall: Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments regarding the proposal to change the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation from Industrial (I) to Single Family Residential (SF) and change the zoning district from Industrial (1) to Single Family Residential Urban (R-3). The project includes the construction of a cottage-style development for a 55+community (Proponent: Circle J Mobile Home Park, LLC). The Department of Ecology (Ecology) has reviewed the documents and submits the following comments: Hazardous Waste and Toxics Reduntion Prearam Wastes produced during construction or remodeling can be dangerous wastes in Washington State. Some of these wastes include absorbent material, aerosol cans, asbestos-containing materials, lead-containing materials, PCB-containing light ballasts, waste paint,waste paint thinner, sanding dust and treated wood. The Common Construction and Demolition Wastes website has a more comprehensive list and a link to identifying and designating your wastes. You can find this information on line at l7ttp://v v.,v..ecv.wa.eovleresUrirms/hwlrklun;ermmticon-wrin demo wIstcs.htri71 Responsibility for construction waste generated at a facility is the responsibility of the facility that generates the waste. You can find more information about who is responsible for properly managing construction debris at ltttfr:llw�� v ccr.�.+'a.eao i rorzrun ehtvt�:�I�rl{?eI°r tiad+d:niu r°c onsibiliLv.htn71 In order to adequately identify some of your construction and remodel debris, you may need to sample and test the wastes generated to determine whether they are dangerous waste. You can find this information about how to sample and what to test for at htt :thVveay.ee> ova.gov, rautisaanplir�<n`UeEnol ebris.l�tml. Ms. Karen Kerida11 January 1.6,2019 Page 2 For more information and technical assistance with determining whether wastes are dangerous wastes in Washington, contact John Blunt at(509) 329-3525 or via email at joint b[un t(`4Jecv. i a.gov, Water Quality Program Shannon Adams(509) 329-3610 You must use proper erosion and sediment control practices on the construction she and adjacent areas to prevent upland sediments from entering surface water. Local stormwater ordinances will provide specific requirements. Also, refer to the Stormwater Management Manual for Eastern Washington at hup:liwnnv.cc s.wa.}ovlprvarains/wgtstormstiater/eastere inaaiLIal!nia L All ground disturbed by construction activities must be stabilized. When appropriate, use native vegetation typical of the site. You roust register all new dry wells and other injection wells with the Underground Injection Control program ( 1IC)at Department of Ecology prior to use. In addition. discharge from the well(s) must comply with the ground water quality requirement (nonendangerment standard)at the top of the ground water table. Contact the Eastern Regional Office U C Coordinator,Llyn Darer s at(509)329-3518 or via email at L1yn.Dorerrius cc v.winuov. You may also go to haps:AlecotouN.wa.gov/Reauilatiorls- PenniisGuidance-technicalnissistunce/Underi round-iniec ton-control-prom m For registration forms and further information. RCW 90.48.080 prohibits the discharge of polluting matter to waters of the state of Washington. Any discharge of sediment-laden runoff or other pollutants to waters of the State without a permit is in violation of Chapters 90.48 of the Revised Code of Washington (RCW), Water Pollution Control, and 173-201A of the Washington Administrative Code (WAC) Water Quality Standards for Surface Waters of the state of Washington and is subject to enforcement action. Even on projects that do not require a permit,the discharge of polluting matter to waters of the state of Washington is prohibited and adequate erosion and sediment control measures should be utilized. State Environmental Policy Act(SEFA) Ecology bases comments upon information submitted for review. As such, they.do not constitute an exhaustive list of the various authorizations you must obtain, nor legal requirements you must fulfill in order to carry out the proposed action. Please contact the appropriate staff listed above if you have any questions or would like to respond to these comments. Department of Ecology Eastern Regional Office (Ecology File#: 201900021) cc: Danny Davis, Circle J Mobile Home Park, LLC Karen Kendall From: Ostwald, Larry E. <Larry.E.Cstwald p66.com5, Sent: Thursday, January 3, 2419 12:21 PM To: Karen Kendall Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL]Request for Comments- CPA-2419-0001 No impact to Yellowstone Pipe Line Cum pany. Sent from my iPhorte On Jan 3, 2019, at 1:03 PM, Karen Kendall<kkendail s okanevalle .or p wrote; All, Please review the attached Environmental Checklist and associated materials for the following project: Project Name: Park Road Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment File K: CPA-2019-0001 Parcel: 45483.9059 If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Best regards, Karen Kendall I Planner 10210 E. Sprague Avenue I Spokane Valley,WA 99206 (509)720.5026 I kisendall@soolanevallev.org. ‹image 061.1pg phis email and any attachments may be subject to disclosure pursuant to wasritngton State's Public Record Act,chapter 42.56 RCW. <CPA-2019-0001 SEPA Rou1ing.pd <CPA-2019-0001 vicinity map.pdf), EXHIBIT 9 Graphic 1: Parcels Requiring Transitional Regulations E Rrnad ay Awe LEGEND illiParce11 ❑ CPA-2019-0001 Transitional Parcel Z Regulations Buffer Parcel 1= 45183.9057 Parcel 2= 45183,9458 Parcel 3= 45183.9151 Parcel 4--45183.9167 Parcel 3 eL � Parcel 4 1 ileywxy Aitif Graphic 2: Transitional Regulations on Subject Parcel (CPA-2019-0001) LEGEND 0 CPA-2019-0001 111111":11T E Adjacent parcels paned R-3 1.1 Transitional ReEulat'r'n Buffer H _ F '/al l eyw ti p +`a Graphic 3: Adjacent Industrial Proposed Activity I 4 E Ernmthrd,rir Ave LEGEND —1-1 —1..17 El CPA-2019-0001 i Pre-Application Meeting conducted IMI Submitted Building l'errnit 1 Parcel 45183.9151 ilfZ it Parcel 45183,910 1 Lismiiii F Val AVP _ = ' r Graphic 4 Visual representation of transitional regulations (proposed development directly south of amendment) CPA-2019-0001 .. -,,mi I 30 feet of property limited in development adjacent to R-3 zone. r DRAIN 113 Mt GRAVEL Lig i . a - Pre-Application Request • Parcel 45183.9151 ▪ _ 40,000 square foot _ , manufacturing facility ▪ L . 1 r- _ ____] — GRAVEL Vi jL . ti y a--.a LEGEND _I_ -L - - - - _- -- GRAVEL -- Parcel Boundary ' 0 CPA-2019-0001 Transitional Area EXHIBIT 10 CPA-2019-0001 Public Comment(s) From: jphn erull To: Karen Kendall; Marsha Negt Subject: CPA-1Ol94001,622 N,Park Road Comp Plan Change and Rezone DOE: Thursday,February 14,2019 6:39:59 PM Karen Kendall, My name is John Crull and I ani submitting this comment letter on behalf of the Crull Living Trust, Wo have owned the property located at 70R N. Park Road, which is directly adjacent to the subject property, since the mid 1950s. We oppose the proposed Comprehensive Plan Change and downzone from Industrial to R3 residential for the following reasons: 1 ) Land use along both sides of Park Road between Sprague Avenue arid Broadway is industrial except for the two small vestigial lots from an earlier era, one of which is our 708 N. Park Road property. Both we and the neighboring 630 N. Park Road owner have long resigned ourselves to the reality the Park Road corridor between Sprague and Broadway has irreversibly transformed into an industrial corridor over the past half century. Any possible value our property may yield in the future will result from eventual conversion to a commercial or industrial use. If the Camp Plan and Downzone is approved, the possibility of our property being merged with the larger adjacent subject property, for a future larger scale commercial or industrial purpose, will be eliminated. By foreclosing this foreseeable merging of future interests, the proposed action is damaging to our property, particularly-so in that our two small lots, if not combined with the subject property for a larger development, are just not large enough to support most commercial and industrial uses. 2) If the subject property is down-zoned and developed with a residential use, it is quite likely that both the owners and future residents of that property will oppose any future commercial or industrial development we will, at some point, sack to establish on our property. The potential residential 1 industrial land use clash that approval of the proposed action will inevitably tee-up is another serious impact to our property ifdown-zone is approved. 3) Further, our property is simply not deep enough to accommodate typical environmental mitigations [setbacks, landscaped buffers, etc) often imposed on commercial and industrial projects that share a common boundary with residential zoning. Please do not set us hp for this future mitigation scenario by approving the dawnzone and allowing subsequent development of the subject property with residential units! 4) We cannot join applicant's petition because our property is obviously not suitable for future residential redevelopment, It is highly impacted by both major arterial traffic, mostly trucks, and surrounding commercial and industrial development. Northbound traffic on Park Road routinely backs up from the Park & nrnaciway stoplight in front of our property making ingress and egress very difficult throughout the day. The only viable future option for our property, if not combined with the larger subject property, is a commercial or industrial use. Again...allowing the subject properly to be developed with a residential use limits our future redevelopment options. We respectfully request that you consider the existing pattern and character of industrial use along Lark Road, and the serious adverse impact the Comp Plan Change and Rezone will have on our property. Please deny the applicant's petition. Thanks for your consideration. Best Regards, John Crud On behalf of the Crull Living Trust 206.920.2235 1201 N. Evergreen Road#2014 Spokane Valley, WA 99216 EXHIBIT 10 Karen Kendall CPA-2019-0001 ern: John crull cjdcrull@gmail.com> - dot: Monday, February 25,2019 412 PM To; Karen Kendall; Marsha Nead Subject! lie:CPA-2019-0001, 622 N.Park Road Comp Plan Change and Rezone Re: CPA-2019-0001 , 622 N. Park Road Comp Plan Change and Rezone Bear Karen Kendall and Planning Commission Members: I am writing to let you know that I will be out of town and unable to attend the Thursday 2/2 evening Public Hearing on this requested Comp Plan and Rezone application referenced above. Please do net interpret my absence as lack of interest or concern about the Planning Commission decision on This important matter. If approved Comprehensive Plan amendment and Rezone will be highly detrimental to our property at 708 North Park Road, Since I cannot be there in person to vocalize my opposition, l respectfully request that you accept this second communication as a stand-in for my oral testimony. As the Staff Report correctly points out...approvai of subject application will create a new development restriction on both our property and the neighboring 630 North Park Road property...namely the 30 foot wide industrial buffer. Given the small size of both the 630 and 708 N. Park Road properties,this new buffer created ' the rezone would make our small properties virtually undevelopable. While the applicant has indicated willingness to incorporate the new buffer within the larger subject property, my understanding is that such a condition cannot be written into the Comp Plan/Rezone decision. So, there can be no guarantee that this new buffer requirement will not eventually fall upon us to provide. For this reason and other reasons cited in my prior comment letter, I reiterate my request that you deny this application. Thank you for your consideration. John Crull On behalf of the Crull Living Trust Owner of the 708 North Park Road property 1201 N. Evergreen Road Apt 2014 Spokane Valley, WA 99216 206.920.2235 On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 6:39 PM john coati <ihcrull r�mail.com wrote: Karen Kendall, My name is Jolt.. Crull and I am submitting this comment letter on behalf of the Crull Living Trust. We have wned the property located at 70$N. Park Road, which is directly adjacent to the subject property, since the mid 1950s. i We oppose the proposed Comprehensive Plan Change and clownzone from Industrial to R3 residential for the following reasons: 1) Land use along both sides of Park Road between Sprague Avenue and Broadway is industrial except for the two small vestigial lots from an earlier era, one of which is our 708 N. Park Road property. Both we and the neighboring 630 N, Park Road owner have long resigned ourselves to the reality the Park Road corridor between Sprague and Broadway has irreversibly transformed into an industrial corridor over the past half century. Any possible value our property may yield in the future will result from eventual conversion to a commercial or industrial use. If the Comp Plan and Downzone is approved,the possibility of our property being merged with the larger adjacent subject property, for a future larger scale commercial or industrial purpose, will he eliminated. By foreclosing this foreseeable merging of future interests,the proposed action is damaging to our property, particularly-so in that our two small lots, if not combined with the subject property for a larger development, are just not large enough to support most commercial and industrial uses. 2) Ifthe subject property is down-zoned and developed with a residential use, it is quite likely that both the owners and future residents of that property will oppose any future commercial or industrial development we will, at some point, seek to establish on our property. The potential residential I industrial land use clash that approval of the proposed action will inevitably tee-up is another serious impact to our property if down-zone is approved. ) Further, our property is simply not deep enough to accommodate typical environmental mitigations (setbacks, landscaped buffers, etc) often imposed on commercial and industrial projects that share a common boundary with residential zoning, Please do not set us up for this future mitigation scenario by approving the downzone and allowing subsequent development of the subject property with residential units! 4) We cannot join applicant's petition because cur property is obviously not suitable for future residential redevelopment. It is highly impacted by both major arterial traffic,mostly trucks, and surrounding commercial and industrial development. Northbound traffic on Park Road routinely backs up from the Park& Broadway stoplight in front of our property making ingress and egress very difficult throughout the day. The only viable future option for our property, if not combined with the larger subject property,is a commercial or industrial use, Again...allowing the subjectproperty to be developed with a residential use limits our future redevelopment options. We respectfully request that you consider the existing pattern and character of industrial use along Park Road, and the serious adverse impact the Comp Plan Change and Rezone will have on our property. Please deny the applicant's petition. Thanks for your consideration. Best Regards, John Crull On behalf of the Crull Living Trust 206.920.2235 201 N. Evergreen Road #2014 Spokane Valley, WA 99216 2 EXHIBIT 10 CKaren Kendall -2019-0001 'tom: Brian Chavez <valley+maystoragn grnatLcom> .erat: Wednesday, February 27, 2019 12:14 PM To: Karen Kendall subject: CPA -2019-0001 ,622 N Park Road Comp Plane Change and Rezone.Tue5day Feb 27th 2019 To the Planing commission,Karen Kendall My name is Brian Chavez I own property directly adjacent on two sides to the subject property at 630 N park Rd ,I have owned this property since 1992. I oppose the proposed Comprehensive Plan Change and down Zone from Industrial to R3 for multiple reasons I] I Agree with ail of city of Spokane Valley Staff Assessments a] particularly the finding on pg 3 that states [ The transitional standards would significantly limit development of Parcel 2 as the R3 zone would border on two sides of a lot only 70 feet by 150 feet in size ] essentially making my industrial zoned prop unusable b] staff reviewed the application and noted in section C.I.a. [2] that the request was in conflict with Comprehensive Plan goals and several policies c] staff Conclusion pg [The proposed amendment is not consistent with the City's Adopted Comprehensive Plan. 2] Park rd is industrial in this area If you are not familiar with the area ,622 park is across the street from the old central pre mix concrete plant and gravel yard which is now being used as a contractor yard. 3] A reduction in zoning intensity will be detrimental to the property's in the immediate vicinity,this area is obviously a industrial. area and the introduction of-Single Family Residential has the potential to cause a significant increase in noise and traffic complaints to the City of Spokane Valley, and hamper existing owners normal use of their industrial zoned property with nuisance complaints If you have any question that 1 can answer please call Pm out of tnwii all week 509 991 2450 Best Regards Brian Chavez XHIBI 1 1 Presentation by Applicant at February 28 , 2019 public hearing z128/2O1 • E`- CPA2OI9-0001 ,s Circle J MHP, LLC Application Request Danny Davis, Representative Initial, Perspective Parcel 1 • � Pilrral! Proposed Parcel fi W rcul 4 -- x 2/28/2019 The other side of the coin - t �oryir Ay. i��q{k� F Existing Proposed1st i - iiiip2 I co 3 x. 1 in_z r Pile. x - .7 �f t + ,. . I\ .w- 61 tow income homes for a 55 Ir. :F - . �.eand older communit n .:' 1. } Industrial - 0 10 7.. C L. • p s y3, Industrial l 7 Current potential usages under the existing industrial zoning Dog Kennels Animal processing and for handling Heavy assembly • Crematorium Off road vehicle use Racetrack Public utility distribution facility (sewer plant?) Heavy truck industria', sales and repair i:orpalt hllity with Spokane Valley's C f)m rehensive Nan-Adopted 12/ 1 /2016 "Provide for Land uses that are essential to Spokane Valley Residents, Employees, and visitors". Land Use Goal #2 'Enable the development of affordable housing for oh' income t'= Levels". Housing Goal #2 ''Adopt development regulations that expand housing choices by allowing innovetive housing types including tiny homes, accessory dwelling units, pre-fabricated homes, co-housing, cottage housing, and other housing types." Housing Policy 412 "Housing is a key issue for many Spokane Valley residents and participants in the visioning workshops highlighted housing affordability, housing for seniors, and housing diversity as important challenges for the City to address." Chapter 1, Page 16 2/28/2019 1. Neighbor Friendly PirposaL 11111H 11 q viro 71111111111111L. _ _____ 4 _ _ __ Summary Inning the parcel Industrial in the first place was a mistalte. Cjuite possibly driven from a "10,000" ft. view perspective at the time. - A residential zoning is much more compatible to the general health and quiet enjoyment of the 61 low-income senior households located directly adjacent to the subject parcel. i Acceptance of this proposal will remain in line with many of the Comprehensive Plan's stated goals. + A promise of a neighbor friendly development plan. * Thank you for your time and consideration/ 8 4 TAB3 COMMUNITY& PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT M BUILDING & PLANNING DIVISION Silt . olne Valley STAFF REPORT TO TI{E PLANNING COMMISSION .000 CPA-2019-0002 STAFF REPORT DATE: February 6,2019 HEARING DATE AND LOCATION: February 14, 2019, beginning at 6:1)0 p.m., Spokane Valley City Hall Conned Chambers, 10210 East Sprague Avenue, Spokane Valley, Washington 99206. ProWi Number: CPA-2019-0002 Application Description: Request to change the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation from Single Family Residential (SFR)to Neighborhood Commercial (NC)and to change the Zoning District from Single Family Residential Urban (R-3) to Neighborhood Commercial(NC) Loc.antiu»: Parcel number 45234.0210 addressed as 810 S. Sullivan Road, and panel number 45234.4501 add,essed as 902 S Sullivan Road; located in the SW corner of 8'"Avenue and Sullivan Road, further located in the SE VA of Section 23,Township 25 North, Range 44 East, Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washington Applicant: Whipple Consulting Engineers, Inc ,_ 21 S Pines Road, Spokane Valley, WA 99206 Owner: Advent Lutheran Church, 13009 E Broadway Ave, Spokane Valley, WA 99216 TCF Properties LLC,320 S Sullivan Road,Spokane Valley, WA 99037 Date of Application; October 30,2018 Staff Contact: Martin Palarriuk, Planner, 10210 E Sprague Avenue,Spokane Valley, WA 99206 _ APPROVAL CRITERIA: Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plant, Title 17 Spokane Val ley Municipal Code (SVMC) General Provisions, Title 19 SVMC Zoning Regulations, and Title 21 SVMC Environmental Controls. ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit 1: Application Exhibit 5: SEPA Checklist Exhibit 2: Vicinity Map Exhibit 6: Environment Determinations Exhibit 3: Comprehensive Plan Map Exhibit 7: Notice of Public Hearing Exhibit 4: Zoning Map Exhibit 8: Agency Comments A. BACKGROUND INFORMATION The Comprehensive Plan Map and Zoning Map amendment is a privately-initiated request to change the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation of parcels 45234.4501 and 45234.0214 from Single Family Residential (SFR)to Neighborhood Commercial (NC)and to change the Zoning District from Single Family Residential Urban (R-3)to Neighborhood Commercial (NC). The land use located at 810 S. Sullivan Road is a Lutheran pre-school and Genesis Church. The site slopes from the higher south portion of the site down to the lower north portion of the site. The Genesis Page 1 of 10 Matt`Report CPA-2019-00012 Church is centrally located on the site and entry to the church is from Sullivan Road. A large, paved parking area lies along the south side oldie church and backs to the backyard of several single-family homes located along 9th Avenue. The pre-school fronts 81r'Avenue and consists ref the day-lighted portion of the building with a gravel entry and parking area. The approach into the pre-school is unimproved. A nine unit duplex development and a church are located directly across 811'Avenue on the north side,and a Vera irrigation District pomp house and utility building are adjacent to the west of site. Central Valley High School is across Sullivan Road to the east, and fain-teen single-family homes in the Revious Addition subdivision are located south of the site adjacent to the large parking lot. The Revlous Addition plat was recorded in 1979 and the homes were constructed in the early to arid-1980s, The existing use located at 902 S. Sullivan Road within the Revious Addition is a single-family residence and a detached accessory structure. The home fronts onto 9111 Avenue, with the primary access taken from 911'Ave, and a secondary access to the accessory building taken from Sullivan Road, It appears that an informal automotive repair business may have been conducted from the accessory structure with access taken from Sullivan Road. City of Spokane Valley home occupation records do not show any business licensing activity fcr the address.. The loot is fronted on two sides by streets and on a third side by the parking lot for the Genesis Church. The Central Valley High School is located directly across Sullivan Road from the site. The 59-acre high school site consists of 240,000 square feet of school buildings, parking areas,sports fields and open landscape areas With an enrollment of over 2,300 students, the school generates considerable vehicular and pedestrian traffic during the a.m. and p.m. student drop-off and pick-up periods, as well as during after-school events. A 40-foot wide Bonneville rower Administration (BPA)casement encumbers both of the properties along the east boundary_ BPA operates the Vera Tap to Trentwood—Valley Way No. 1 power distribution facility within the easement running from the substation located north of the Spokane Valley Mall to the substation at 36'1'Avenue and Stullrvan Road. The facility consists of a series of power poles spaced approximately 240 feet apart and approximately 70 feet in height. The overhead power line is shared by several providers and serves both commercial and residential uses. Single-family residential neighborhoods are located south and west of the site with an average dwelling density of approximately 2,5 dwelling units per acre. The neighborhoods consist of a mix of older and newer homes. Sullivan Square Shopping Center,Fred Meyer and Ace Hardware stores are located at the Sprague/Sullivan intersection, The area is well served by retail, banking, fast-food,restaurant, vehicle services, and fuelieonvenience establishments. All of these establishments can be found within a half mile of the siteSeveral large, multi-family apartment complexes are located north and northeast of the site along 4'h Avenue. Sullivan Road is located along the east boundaries of both parcels running north/south. Sullivan Road is a 5-lane north/south Urban Principal Arterial arid provides connection to the east/west running principal and minor arterials, and major collectors. 8`''Avenue is located along the north boundary of the project site and is a Minor Arterial. 9`I, Avenue is a local access street, According to traffic counts conducted by the City of Spokane Valley Traffic Engineering Division in 2017, the intersection of 8144 Avenue and Sullivan Road experiences nearly 20,000 vehicular trips per day. The site is not served by sidewalks. There are no sidewalks located along the west side of Sullivan Road nor on the south side of 8i'`Avenue. The north side of 8t Avenue has a 5-foot sidewalk adjacent to the street running from Sullivan Road west to Adams Elementary School. A 7-foot wide sidewalk and 8-foot wide landscape strip are located adjacent to Sullivan Road on the east side oldie road along the high school frontage. The landscape strip is filled with hushes,grasses, and street trees. The sidewalk is contiguous along the east side of Sullivan Road From Sprague Avenue all the way to 244, Avenue. Paget of 10 Stan-Rep:rt CFA-20 9-Lloo2 PROPERTY INFORMATION: Size and Characteristics: The property consists of two parcels totaling 3.63 acres in size with frontage on Sth Avenue to the north and Sullivan Road to the cast, Comprehensive Plan: Single Family Residential(SFR) Zoning: Single Family Residential Urban (R-3) Existing Land Use: A church with a clay-lighted lower level is located on the north property. A pre-school occupies the lower level and takes access from th Avenue with the entrance located on the north side of the building. The church occupies the upper level of the building. The main entrance is located on the smith side of the building and the church parking lot is situated on the southern one-half of the parcel with two access approaches ear Sullivan Road. A single family home and garage are located on the smith property. SURROUNDING COMPREHENSIVE,PLAN,ZONING,AND LAND USES: Comp Plan: Single Family Residential (SFR) _ North Zoning: Single Family Residential Urban (R-3) Uses: Duplexes and r church__ _ . Coinp Plan: Single Family Residential (SFR) South Zoning: Single Family Residential Urban (R-3) Uses: Single funnily homes _ Comp Plan: Single Family Residential (SFR) East Zoning: Single Family Residential Urban (R-3) Uses: Vera Water and Power buildings _ Comp Plan: Single Family Residential (SFR) West Zoning: Single Family Residential Urban (R-3) Uses: Central Valley High School — IMPLICATIONS: The rezone of the site to Neighborhood Commercial would allow a broader range of uses than the R-3 zone, including retail and office uses. If redevelopment to a commercial use were to occur,the adjacent residential uses could experience impacts. impacts nay include greater lot building coverage and increased vehicle and pedestrian traffic into and out of the site. The impacts to the residential uses will be mitigated by the building setbacks,screening, and landscaping. The Neighborhood Commercial acne is intended to provide an amenity that serves the neighborhood. In addition to retail and office uses, the NC zone allows some low intensity commercial uses such as medical office, day care, and community ball; club or lodge. Specific examples include dental clinic, martial arts ordancing studio, accounting, law, engineering office,a single family hone, or vehicle charging station. Uses which are allowed but require compliance with supplemental regulations include general indoor and outdoor storage, fueling station, car wash, retail sales and service, animal clinic, exercise facility, and kennel. The supplemental regulations vary and are specific to the.use. For example,a car wash is limited to a single bay in the NC zone; outdoor storage is only permitted as an accessory use to a permitted use in the NC zone; animal clinics and veterinary clinics shall serve only small animals in the NC zone. Page 3 of I D _Staff Report CPA 2019-0002 Nonresidential development in the NC zone that is adjacent to a residential use is subject to dimensional standards intended 10 reduce the impact to the residential uses and the neighborhood. The table below provides a comparison of the development starndards between the R-3 and the NC zone, Generally, the standards provide far a similar scale of development in both zones with similar building height and setbacks requirements. Additionally, parking or drive aisles would require screening, loading ar-eas ,n'ould be prohibited within 30 feet of the residential zone, and mechanical equipment, building vents,and exhaust within transitional setback areas would require screening. All outdoor lighting in the transitional setbacks would be shielded and limited to 16 feet in height. Landscaping, parking, and on-site treatment of stormwater would also be required consistent with the development regulations. The existing church was constructed prior to the adoption of these regulations and is considered a legal nonconforming structure with regards to the standards. The following table provides a comparison.of the development requirements for both zones, R-3 & NC Development Standard Comparison Lot Maximums Minimum Setbacks ' Density Zone Building Height Coverage Front Yard Rear Yard Side Yard Garage R-3 35 fl. 50% 15 ft. 20 ft. _ 5 ft. 20 ft. 6 du'slacre NC 35 ft. N/A - 15 it,* . 10 ft." 10 ft.* N1A Same' *If adjac•ettt to a residential use. 'Shall comply with the density of adjacent single family residential zone. APPLICATION PROCESSING; Chapter 17.80 Permit Processing Procedures in the SVMC. The following summarizes key application procedures for the proposal. Pre-A p lication Meetinr : - October 9,2018 Application Submitted: October 30,2018 SEP.A Determination of Norr-Significance Issue date _ February 8,2019 End of Appeal Period for DNS: Not Appealed February 22,2019 Date of Posted Notice of Public Hearing February 6,2.019 Date of Published Notice nfPublic I-lean : Februa 8 & 15, 2019 Date of Mailed Notice ofPublic Hearing. February 13,2019 B. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECITIC TO SEPA 1. Findings: Pursuant to Title 21 (Environmental Controls) SVMC, the lead agency has determined that this proposal does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21 C-030(2)(c). The Building and Planning Division issued a Determination of Non-Significance (DIMS) for the- proposal heproposal on February 8, 2019. The determination was made after review of a completed environmental checklist, the application, Titles 19, 21, and 22 SVMC, a site assessment, public arid agency comments, the Comprehensive Plan and the Comprehensive Plan Environmental Impact Statement Page 4 of 10 Staff'Report CPA-2019-0002 2. Conclusion(s): The procedural requirements of the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) and Title 21 SV'MC have been fulfilled. C. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT AM) REZONE 1. Compliance with Title 17 (General Provisions) of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code a. Findings: SVMC 17.80.140(H).Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezone Approval Criteria i. The City may approve Comprehensive Plan amendments and area-wide zone map amendments if it finds that (1) The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to the public health, safety, welfare,and protection of the environment; Arrcrlys/s:Land use and the regulation of land uses are inherently relatedtothe public health, safety, welfare and protection of the environment. Corrrrnurritya infrastructure (which is created to protect public health, safety, and welfare) is designed and built in response to the development of properly which in tarn is dictated by the land uses that are permitted through the comprehensive plan and zoning regulations. The necessary infrastructure components (streets, water, sewer, etc.) are available to support the proposed amendment. (2) The proposed amendment is consistent with the requirements of Chapter 36.70A RCW and with the portion of the City's adopted plan not affected by the amendment; Analysis: The Growth Management Act (UMA) adapts thirteen goads to guide the development of local comprehensive plans and development regulations. The request would allow opportunity fir growth in a centralized area with adequate public facilities, and creates opportunity for small scale businesses to develop in a neighborhood oriented commercial area within walking distance of residential neighborhoods. The request does not conflict with any other GAA goals or any non- related portions of the City's Comprehensive Plan_ (3) The proposed amendment responds to a substantial change Iii conditions beyond the property owner's control applicable to the area within which the subject property lies; Analysis: Substantial change has not occurred since the 2016 Legislative Update to the Comprehensive Plan. Changes have occurred in the area since the two properties were initially developed nearly four decades ago. Then the Central Volley High School was remodeled and reopened in September 2002 the school had expanded to over 50 acres with 240,000 square feel under roof including a 57i-seat performing arts center,gymnasiums with four full size basketball courts aridseaiingfor 2,2(10fnns, ond multi-use student commons, Current enrollment is over 2,300 students. Considerable millfamily development has occurred along fir' Avenue and Sullivan Road with approximately 700 new apartments constructed within this area since 2003. Based on a survey of historical traffic counts completed by the City traffic engineers, traffic has Increased since the initial property development however, traffic has not Page 5 of 10 Staff'Repoi1 CPA-2019-0002 increased since the 2016 update The amendment would allow the site to transition from a residential use to a neighborhood scale commercial or office development in an area that has experienced increased traffic associated with the increase in student population at the high school and residential growth to the south. (4) The proposed amendment corrects an obvious hipping error; or Analysis: The amendment is not in response to a wrapping error and would not correct any error. (5) The proposed amendment addresses an ideratiiiied deficiency in the Comprehensive Plan, Analysis: The 2016 Comprehensive Plan Update specifically sought to identify areas into which NC zoning could be cloistered and identffied the need as a convoy vnity priority, The Comprehensive Plan identifies neighborhood areas served by arterial roadways. Although the site is served by arterial roadways, the subject parcel was not identified for NC land crse as part of that update. The current property owners have expressed an interest ire futfilling this identified need for neighborhood commercial nodes with the zoning change. The neighborhood is already served by the retail and commercial uses located within one half mile of the site. A new 6,100 foot retail building is being constructed approximately one tenth of a mile north of the site and will house a Domino's Pizza franchise. Banking, retail,fast food, dining large and small grocery markets, and vehicle services are all located-kvithin one half mile of the site. The amendment does not address an identified deficiency however it does offer an opportunity,for smaller scale commercial development than the areas located anther north ii. The City must also consider the following factors prior to approving Comprehensive Plan arnendinents (1) The effect upon the physical environment; Anniysis: The change to NC will allow neighborhood commercial development of the property. The site will likely transition from a residential use with residential driveways, trees, !awry, and buildings to a commercial building with parking structures, commercial landscaping, and storinwater treatment areas. Traffic will likely increase with the commercial development. Roth sites have been developed with building,paving and grading rrctitdty. (2) The effeet on open space,streams, rivers, and lakes; Analysis: Any storimwater associated s ith commercial development will be retained and treated on the site. The site does not contain any streams, rivers or lakes. The open space areas associated with the required residential front, rear,flanking, and side yards will likely transition to parking ot commercial landscaping areas. This will result in a negligible impact on the open space areas. (3) The compatibility with and impact on adjacent land uses and surrounding neighborhoods; Attrrdysis: NC development is purposefully limited in size to reduce impacts to neighboring residential uses. Development standards will limit the height and location of any new commercial development and together with landscaping and screening standards, will reduce the impacts to adjacent residential uses. The existing church is Page 6of 10 Staff J.eport CPA-2019-0002 a permitted use in the NC zone and was developed prior to the NC development standard Subsequent changes of we would have to be a permitted use in the NC' zoning district and comply with the NC development standards. (4) The adequacy of and impact on community facilities including utilities, roads, public transporLation, parks, recreation, and schools; Aria/pis: A neighborhood commercial use will likely have minimal impact on parks, recreation or schools. Generally a commercial use does not generate a treed for those facilities. As noted earlier the uses permitted within the NC zone are smaller in scale and suited for neighborhoods. Sullivan Road is a Principal Arterial designed to serve through trips and connect Spokane Valley with the rest ofthe region. S Aversu+e is an Urban Minor Arterial. Minor arterial streets provide inter-neighborhood connections, transit access, and serve both local and through trips. No impacts on camnrunity facilities are anticipated. (5) The benefit to the neighborhood, City, and region; Analysis: The 2016 Comp Plan update increased the neighborhood commercial nodes, The community expressed a strong desire to encourage neighborhood scale commercial development_ .The neighborhood is already served by the larger-scale commercial and retail uses north of site along ei Avenue and Sprague Avenue. The existing church is consistent with neighborhood commercial development. The redevelopment of the southern property/Min single family residential to an NC we, such as office, would allow a use that is reasonable and appropriate for the location =ram.from the school. (6) The quantity and location of land planned for the proposed land use type and density and the demand for such land: Analysis: The 2016 legislative update to the Comprehensive Plan increased the areas that are zoned NC. The NC zoned lands are scattered Throughout the Gity.,primarily located on arterial streets ii ithirr neighborhoods. NC zoned lands are located south of the site at the intersections of 10 and Sullivan,. and 244' and Sullivan. A small coffee/espresso stand has developed at le and Sullivan. Of the five NC-zoned properties closest to this site, the 10fS'ullivan site is the only site lo redevelop,from the existing use into a neighborhood commercial use, This site is located within one half mile of major retail centers at Sprague/Sullivan and smaller retail centers at 4t/`atllivan_ During school periods the Central Valley High School, with a student population of over 2300 students, adds population density that can support NC' development. Additional NC properties in this area would not be incompatible with community desires, (7) The current and projected population density in the area; and Asailysis: The NC zone allows single-family dwellings (current use of the south property) and neighborhood scale commercial development, Single family uses are permitted in the NC zone and the proposed change would have no effect on the land use capacity of the property. The proposed change in land use to NC will no impact on the overall density of the area_ (8) The effect upon other aspects of the Comprehensive Plan. Analysis: The NC designation would support trinity of rhe Economic Development, Land Use, Transportation, and Housing goals, It would be likely to have little effect Page 7 of 10 Staff Report CPA-21119-0002 or the Capital Facilities and Public Services, Public and Private D ilittes,t Parks and Open Space and Natural Resources elements of the Comprehensive plan, Cnnclusiott(s : For the reasons outlined above the proposed atnendrnent is consistent with SVJvIC 17.617,140(fa'a, 2. Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan a. Findings: The amendment is consistent with the goals arid policies enumerated in the Comprehensive Plan. Economic Development goal ED-G1 seeks to support economic opportunities and ernploynteet growth for Spokane Valley, The adopted Comptehensive Plan Policies LH-P1 and LU-P2 encourage neighborhood scale development in appropriate locations. The NC use designates area for small-scale neighborhoods serving retail and office uses. Ideally the areas are no larger than two acres in size and are located as business clusters. However, several sites larger than 2 acres have previously been designated for NC land use within the City of Spokane Valley. The 2016 Comprehensive Plan update identified the NC zone,as underserved and identified and designated areas for NC. Coact us i o n(s): The proposed amendment is consistent with the City s Adopted Comprehensive Plan_ 3. Adequate Public Facilities a. Findings: The Growth Management Act (GMA) and the City's Comprehensive Plan requires that public facilities and services be adequate to serve the development at the time the development is available for occupancy, The area is currently served with adequate public facilities and services. Vera Irrigation I)istriet 45, Spokane County Environmental Services, Spokane Valley Fire District, and Central Valley School district provide water, sewer,and fire protection and schools services in this area, The applicant submitted a Trip Generation and Distribution Letter that generates the number and distribution anew vehicle trips based on the highest use of the property permitted under the NC zone. The City Senior Traffic Engineer determined that sufficient roadway capacity exists to accommodate the oentemplated new vehicle trips and the adopted intersection Level of Service would be meet. Urban services are available. Specific site needs will be addressed at the time a development is proposed for the site h. Conclusions): The proposed amendrnerat will have adequate urban services al the time ofdevetopmerrt. D. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO PUBLIC COMMET'itTS 1. Findings: Staff has received no public comments to date. Comments received following the date of this report will be provided to the Planning Commission at the February 28,2019 meeting, 2. Conelusiort(s): Notice of Public Hearing (NGP1I) was published on February 8 and 15, 2019. The NOPEI was posted on site on February L, 2019 and mailed en February l3, 2019 to residents within an 8O0 foot radius Pursuant to Section 17,8O.I20.131.e the City determined it was appropriate to increase the radius from 400 feet to 800 feet due to the likely public interest in the proposed amendment. Page 8 of 10 Staff'Report CPA-2019-0002 F. FINDINGS ANt) CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO AGENCY COMMENTS 1. Findings: Staff has not received any agency comments of significance to date. Agency Received Comments Comments Dated City of Spokane Valley Senior Traffic Engineer Yes January 17,2019 City of Spokane Valley Development Engineering Ycs January 9,2019 City of Spokane Valley Building & Planning _ City of Spokane Valley Parks &Recreation Spokane. Valley Fire Depailment Yes January 9,2019 City of l lillwood -_ City of Liberty Lake City of Spokane City of Spokane Valley Police Department Spokane County, Building and Planning Spokane County, Environmental Services Spokane County, Clean Air Agency Spokane County, Fire District-No. 1 Spokane County, Fire District No. S Spokane County Regional Health District - Spokane Regional Clean Air Agency Spokane Aquifer Joint Board Spokane Transit Authority(STA) Spokane Regional Transportation Council(SRTC) Washington State Dept of Commerce Washington State Dept of Ecology.O1yrnpia) Washin= on State Deli of Ecolo y (Spokane) Washington Slate Dept of Fish& 1�4 ildliife Washington State Dept of Natural Resources Washington State Dept of Transportation Washtton State Parks&Recreation Commission WA Archaeological &Historic Preservation _ _ Avista Utilities Inland Power&Light Modem Electric Water Company Central Valley_School District fr356 East Valley School District 11361 West Valley School District#363 ti Century Link Comcast Model Irrigation District#18 Consolidated Irrigation District#f 19 East Spokane Water District 111 Vera Water& Power • Spokane County Water District#3 Spokane Tribe of Indians Page 9 of 10 Staff Report CPA-2014-0042 2. Conclusion(s): No concerns we rroled. F, CONCLUSION: For the reasons set forth in Section C(1 and 2)the proposed amendment to change the land use designation from SFR to NC is consistent with the requirements of the SVMMIC 17.84.140(H) and the Comprehensive Plan. Page 10 of 10 1114 SSI P alle CCIMPREI-tEN1SVE PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION e The proposed amendment addresses an identified deficiency in the Comprehensive Plan. STAFF USE ONLY Date Submitted: / Received by: Fee: ie.0061 PLUS * File PART II — APPLICATION INFORMATION E Map Amendment; or Q Text Amendment APPLICANT NAME: Whipple Consulting Engineers, inc MAILING ADDRESS: 21 S. Pines Road Cir : Spokane Valley STATE: VVA. ZtP: 99206 �ipodniallueilEANhippl uccs PHONE: '' _ _) 893-2617 FAX: 0 } 926-0227 a CELL: EMAIL: tOddW{ wi-lipplece.cOrnj PROPERTY OWNER Advent Lutheran Church Si.TCF Properties LLC. MAILING ADDRESS: 13009 E. Broadway Ave Sc 320 S. Sullivan Road Spokane Valley WA 99216 & 99037 CITY: STATE: ZIP: PHONE: FAX: CELL: EMAIL: 810 & 002 S. SullivanRoad 45234 4501. SITE ADDRESS: PARCEL No.; 45234,0 10 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Single Family Residential PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE FLAN DESIGNATION: Neighborhood Cunwriercial ZONING DESIGNATION: R-3 PROPOSED ZONING DESIGNATION: NC BRIEFLY EXPLAIN REASON FOR MAP OR TEXT AMENDMENT(attached full explanation an separate sheet of leer): The completed non-project action is anticipated to allow the redevelopment of the Pa two (2) existini lots into a •rofessiorial office or other commercial entit . The •ro.osed change is anticipated to provide the surrounding land uses with complimentary professional and retail services. PI:06 VI G Page 3 or 4 Valley COMPREHENISVE FLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION PART III — AUTHORIZATION (Signature of legal owner or applicant) Ben CQndrnan en (print name) swear or affirm that the above responses are made truthfully and to the best of my knowledge. (Signature) (Date) NOTARY STATE OF WASHINGTON) ss: COUNTY OF SPOKANE SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this 2 day of e- , 20I NOTARY SEAL . NOTARY SIGNATURE Notary Public in end for the State of Washington DREW DOUGLAS DALTON STATE OF WASFINGTC3N Reid Ing at: NOTARY PUBLUC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES 01-10-2G p f- G'iV My appointment expires: LEGAL OWNER AUTHORIZATION: If the applicant is not the legal owner(s), the owner must provide the foilowing acknowledgement owner of the above described property do hereby authorize 41` to represent me and my interests in all matters regarding this application. Date: rd/24/ /r PL-C6 V1.O Page 4 nI 4 J/f. . ! .rw -14 c i' 2tLFki tharvenSpefr icez los ,. March 27, 2018 Stephen H. Harr Attorney at Law 320 S. Sullivan RD Spokane Valley, WA 99037 Dear Mr. Ford: This letter as in response to your request that Advent Lutheran Church include our p-operty on 810 S Sullivan RD with your rezoning request of the City of Spokane Valley to change the property you own at 902 S. Sullivan Road from an 1=-3 to Neighborhood Commercial. After careful consideration, the council has decided to approve your request provided that it can be done with no cost to the church. Please feel free to contact us if you have any questions or need more information. Sincerely, Ian Moore Council President 13009 E Broaclw y_Avenue, Spokane Valley,Washington 99216 Phone: (509) 928-7n3 Fax; { Q9}4.92-5219 E "WC E Whipple Consulting Engineers, Inc. Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment Narrative Single Family Residential (SFR) to Neighborhood Coiruriercial 810 S Sullivan Road,and 902 S Sullivan Road Parcel No.s 45234.0210 & 4-5234.4501 Reasons for Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment Request The subject properties are located between 8'1' and 9`t' Avenues along the west side of Sullivan road. The size of the subject properties totals approximately 163 acres_ The comprehensive plan designation is Single Family Residential (SFR) and the parcels are currently zoned Single- Family Residential Urban (R-3). The subject properties are bordered by single family residents to the south and to the west, to the east across Sullivan Road is Central Valley High School, and to the north is a church, a cluster of single-family residents and corridor mixed fronting Sullivan Road. The proposal includes a 3.11 ac +/-parcel (45234,0210) on the Southwest comer of 8`'' Avenue & Sullivan Road: The parcel is currently developed as a church and a daycare facility with appropriate internal parking, and landscaping. Access to the parcel is from 8111 Avenue and Sullivan Road The proposal also includes a 0.52 ac+I-parcel (45234.4501) on the northwest corner of 9th Avenue &Sullivan Road. The parcel is currently developed as a single residence with access driveways on Sullivan Road and 9 Avenue. Development of the subject properties in a viable and subjective nature would be to continue neighborhood commercial land uses found in the area, such as at the intersection of 8`h Avenue& McDonald, 16th Avenue with Evergreen, Adams & Sullivan Roads, 24'11` Avenue with Evergreen & Sullivan Roads, each of these are zoned as neighborhood commercial NC as they are located near a school, church, or city park. It is the intent of the Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment request, that upon approval, or as a part of the approval to NC, that the south parcel be developed as an office building and the north parcel be developed to a highest and best use that compliments the existing adjacent.church and High School facilities We believe that the subject properties should be allowed to develop to the highest and best use in order to maximize density within the City of Spokane Valley, which would be NC. The change in designation would be consistent with similar planning of 16'and 24'h Avenues providing neighborhood commercial at the intersection of atter als. 21 South Pines Rd. • Spokane Valley, WA 99206 PO Box 1566 • Veradale, WA 99037 Phone 509-893-2617 • Fax 509-926-0227 • WhippleCP.com • lnfou@WhippieCE.com Civil, Structural. Traffic. Survey, landscape Architecture and Entitlements Spokane Valley CPA it r Sullivan Road Properties- Single Family Residential to Neighborhood Commercial October 30, 2018 Pate 2 of 5 Approval Criteria A, The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to the public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment; The proposed amendment will have a minimal impact to the surrrnending properties. The proposed amend/nerd will provide a transition and buffer from the high school to the single- family residents to the west of the subject properlie . The residential areas to the west and south will not be adversely affected with the required relational setbacks, landscaping and buffering requirements wider the current development code. The proposed amendment will benefit the community as a whole by providing needed additional office and commercial space along a city arterial and, centralizing public services and maximizing the use of those services which ere near the subject properties. B. The proposed amendment is consistent with the requirements of RCW 36.70A and with the portion cc-the City's adopted plan not affected by the amendment; The proposed amendment is consistent with RCif36.7)A planning goals by providing a mixture of commercial and professional facilities at the intersection of city arterials and reducing the dereu-md need for the community to travelfar•needed services. COSY'Comprehensive Plan The proposed amendment is consistent with land use goal I (LU-G1) to preserve and protect the character of Spokane Valley's residential neighborhoods in Haat there are currently neighborhood commercial zones and land uses located at the intersection of arterials within the south eastern residential section of the City of Spokane Valley. The proposal is consistent with land use policy l (LU--Fl) Enable neighborhood-scale commercial uses in residential areas as the proposal is a Neighborhood Commercial land uses that is similar to existing developments as well as being in character with s�rrrilarzoning at the intersection of other arterials. The proposal is also cortsisterrt with land use policy 2 (LU--F2) where the proposal will support unique, high-quality, and locally owned retail businesses, by providing lands at arterial intersections within the residential areas that they serve. C. The proposed amendment responds to a substantial change in conditions beyond the property owner's control applicable to the area within which the subject property lies; The changes to the economic climate are a condition beyond the properties'owner control. The ecorrrrrirtic changes that haw occwrrr-ed over the past few years have increased the demand for more commercial and professional services within the residential areas for which they serve, The proposed amendment would help fulfill this shift'in commercial and professional demands. Additionally, the change is a logical extension of the existing laid uses of the Sullivan Road corridor. Spokane Valley CPA Sullivan Road Properties- Single Family Residential to Neighborhood Ctmmeroial October 3U,2018 Page 3 of 5 D, The proposed amendment corrects an obvious mapping error; The proposed amendment does not correct a mapping error. E. The proposed amendment addresses an identified deficiency in the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed amendment does not address a deficiency in the Comprehensive Plan but adjusts the plan to changed commercial and professional demands. Specific Factors A. The effect upon the physical environment; The subject properly is not designated as a critical area. The subject property is not within the floodplain, nor within an or-ea of erodable soils, and has no bodies of water(stream or lake) within or adjacent to the subject properties. The change from ERF to NC does not create any significant impacts to the physical environment. Development under either land use designation would result in grading and construction across the entirepropertyand alteration of the existing landscape. B. The effect on open space, streams,,givers, and lakes; The proposed amendment will not affect any adjacent open space nor is it adjacent to any bodies of water, i.e. streams, rivers, or lakes. There are no known =face wafer quality or quantity issues. C. The compatibility with and impact on adjacent land uses and surrounding neighborhoods; The proposed amendment would change the land use and zoning from single family residential, SER, to Neighborhood Commercial, NC. The proposed amendment will be compatible with the adjacent sing!e farmly residential uses to the south and west of the subject properties. it would be expected that this will have minimal impact to the single-family residentialpropertiesto the south and west as the big parcel is already developed as a church and day-care facility with appropriate screening and landscaping of the time. Additionally, the church and r'esid 'rrtia!land uses the north across 846 Avenue are not to be impacted. As for the Central Valley High School to the east the Neighborhood Commercial is anticipated to only serve as a means of noqvenierr for the students crud parents of llu Community. D. The adequacy of and impact on community facilities including utilities, roads, public transportation, parks, recreation, and schools; The proposed amendment will make use of the existing utilities and streets. The parks and recreation facilities within the ar=ea are not anticipated to be impacted, The Central Valley High Spokane Valley CPA Sullivan Road Properties-Single Family Residential to Neighborhood Commercial October 30,2018 Page of School is anticipated to berrefct,from the close proximity ofthe proposed amendment. Public Transportation is provided by STA with stops along Sullivan Roan, east of the property E. The benefit to the neighborhood, city and region; The proposed arriendnaent will benefit the neighborhood by maintaining and marching the character of similar neighborhoods with neighborhood commercial located at the intersection of arterials. The proposed amendment is in an appropriate location to allow for commercial retail and office land use which will maximize the land-use within the City of Spokane Valley anti reduce the need for travel ofresidents beyond the neighborhood. The proposed amenthnent will allow for the use of existing.streets and urban services and lead to a more efficient delivery of those services. The proposed amendment will also encourage alternative modes of transportation such as walking, biking, and bus routes. Also, in this area a bus route currently exists along Sullivan Road. As densities increase, it allows for bus routes to be added or altered to serve Me larger population. The proposed amendment will increase the ability of residents to livor and work within close proximity to commercial, retail and office uses that serve the existing neighborhood and the City of Spokane Valley as a whole. F. The quantity and location of sand planned for the proposed laud use type and density and the demand for such land; The proposed amendment will not create an isolated district which is unrelated to the surrounding neighborhood. 0. The current and projected population density in the area; The existing comprehensive plan and zoning designation of the subject property under R-3 has the potential to be developed up to 21 units, compared to the proposed amendments potential development of the subject property into a 7,000-sf office and an 8-position fuel station with convenience market_ The proposed comprehensive plan amendment will not allow foo•ars increase in residential population density. H. The effect upon other aspects of the Comprehensive Plan; The proposed amendment is within close proximity to services that would be beneficial to a Neighborhood commercial. These services include but are not limited to the existing residential uses, the high school and the Sullivan}toad arterial, as well as the public transportation system that curr'entlypasses near the subject properties on Sullivan Road. The proposed site-speelfc amendment is consistent with the overall comprehensive plan and will have re minimal impact on all other aspects of the comprehensive plan, Spoica a Va11ey CPA Sullivan Road Properties- Single Family Residential to Neighborhood Commercial October 30,2018 Page S ofS Policy LU-Pi Enable neighborhood scale commercial uses in residential areas. The proposed amendment is not proposed to affect this policy but is intended to implement this policy. Policy LU-P2 Support 1,Fpique, high quality, and locally-owned retail in appropriate locations. The proposed amendment will facilitate this policy as ra neighborhood commercial at the intersection of arterials in a residential neighborhood is an appropriate location. CPA-2019-900 Vicinity Map ig rail I: la —.-- .,,L_1 h - I —, Hi+ 1 — ■ 111N■ i ____ _ _ _i di ■I-q Num miiim 11111-..11 j ■ _ - ____ i -- '■■1U■ 1■111■uflu■1! 1 . M r := I■ ON l w� wl — r ' w: mtrim No 1 w IN M:- ■■■■I■I �■■■ 1 I L mon. _7 17 f� ) iilii mH_]'d F. ■ MIN " . m■W■I■� ■■■�■■ 1 :1:_ � : ■ 1)Fh\- (11 I6Ii!. 1■ 11 �■:': /44 ■ 11 ■h I 11 ■— no � i I si II mos EN sou - * �i�1111 �� s• monlIE ON -L-ILL-7-M ■ '■' _ - -' , s■ ■ I !jLL.. #LI 11!■w �"' — 111vissir � L■ w —.' = 11 ii1 I I_■■ 1■�—�iH ! so 1 on ... . 11 v- _. d !! X ■■i I ■11m ■■mn . . I I liiiI 1111611111111 w, Il 1C �--- . ll . 1.hIIIP w�IC� E 1= m \ e r iii - r..IiiiI." " •- , ■ j11 1 111mom INNEN r� -. 4111 JJ N 1,— ' - _ _ iii le _ 1 ,Ip iniliiiiki i' -.ittk Mb" .. 111.4. 1,,,,,,,,i4::'-- 1 E= „_:_cji _ 'l lm�� J �� ll1 i 1 -__�J,_ : ±-1 1 1 i _ ,..-. 0,--01 I f In 1 I I 1 C (-VI, i 3/2019, 11:27:1 9 AM 118,056 0 0.15 0.3 0.6 mi I 4 4 5 ,T , 0 0.25 0.5 1 km CSV Esrs HERE. Gamin. © OpenStree^,t'vlap contrihutces, and the GIS u con frau nitY CSV I Esri,HERE,Garmn.INCREMENT P,NGA,U..GS 1 Sen.HER Comprehensive Nan Map \\\71study Area] IY E hili Ave _ l ' f 9111 A V 1111 CPA-2019-0002 Request: `1"" Owner: AdventLutheran Church TCF F'roper I 11 Change the land use designe erg from %lle F�arcel#:46234 4501, .42S121�]LLC SFR to r C and the Zoning from R-3 to NC i . Address: 810 S Sullivan Rd Zoning Map 1 it Study Area F Heh Awe a li I T zz B9th Aae • CPA-2019-0002 sRequ est: npouaj Owner: Advent Lutheran Church ne TCF Proper-toes LLC Change the lanff vse designation from ValleY parcel;45234.4601, .0210 SFR to NC and She Zoning from R-3 to NC Address: 810 S Sullivan Rd _ po cnsiii SEM CHECKLIST ILCIL[5 r alley sv1 c 21 .2{} 102110 t: Sprague Asoma • Spokane Valley WA 99206 Phone: {509)70-524n • Fax' (509) 720-507(1 • L-I i.in1ilccliL„-rrzr,jn,kEuncl;rll4• '_tirg STAR: USE i)Nt.l` Date Submitted: Received by: _Fee: PLUS #: File #: WOE 18-2022 PART I - REQUIRED MATERIAL "'THE APPLICATION WILL NOT RE ACCEPTED IF THE REQUIRED MATERIALS ARE NOT PROVIDED” E Completed SEPA Checklist Application Fee Reduced Site Plan of proposal in BV" by 11" or 11" by 17" size € Trip Distribution and Generation Letter, if requested by Development Engineering. LUEP.OSE OF CHECKLIST; The Slate Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.210 ROW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts at a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared fcr all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal {and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal. i'il can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. JNSTRUCTJONS FOR APPLICANTS: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly. with the roost precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and oarefully, to the best of your knowledge. 4n most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts, If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or 'does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental -eguletions. such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply 10 all parts of your propose.. even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. OF CFIEGKLIIT FOR NON-PROJECT PROPOSALS: . • Complete this checklist for non-project proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply" IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NON-PROJECT ACTIONS tPart D). For non-project actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant,' and "property or site should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area." respectively. PL-22 V1_p Page 1 of 15 SEPA CHECKLIST EVALUATION FOR °� Kan AGENCY USE ONLY Val lc A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable Sullivan Road CPA 2_ Name of applicant: Whipple Consulting Engineers, Inc 3_ Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: 21 S. Pines Rd, Spokane Valley, WA 99216 Phone: 509-893-2617 Contact: Todd R. Whipple, P.E.1 Ben Goodniansen, E,LT, 4. Date checklist prepared October 16, 2018 5, Agency requesting checklist: City of Spokane Valley 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Comp. planning process through FY 2018/2019; Any future project plans if any, will occur only after the Comp Plan process is finished_ 7_ Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. Yes, Development of a professional office building at 902 5 Sullivan Road. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. This SEPA checklist, Planning level trip Generation letter. 0_ Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting (he property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. There are no other applications pending. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, it known. SEPA Approval 11_ Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) There are two (2) parcels included in the proposed map amendment. The properties are currently listed and zoned as Single Family Residential (R-3) the first parcel is located on the southwest corner of 81h Avenue & Sullivan Road. The parcel is 3,11 ac +/- and is currently developed as a church and PL-22 V1.0 Page 2 of-IS SEPA CHECKLIST EVALUATION FOR pone AGENCY USE ONLY .400.01;Mu icy daycare center the parcel is accessed by driveways on tr Avenue and Sullivan Road. The second parcel is located adjacent to the first on the northwest corner of 9th Avenue & Sullivan Road. The parcel is 0.52 ac +/- and is currently developed as a single-family residence with access on 9t Avenue and Sullivan Road. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The proposal is within the SE ', of Section 23, T25N, R44E W,M, on the Southwest corner of the intersection of 8th Avenue & Sullivan Road at 610 S. & 902 S. Sullivan Road The parcel numbers for the subject properties are 45234.0210, and 45234.4501. 13. Does the proposed action lie within the Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA)? The general Sewer Service Area? Priority Sewer Service Area? (See: Spokane County's ASA Overlay zone Atlas for boundaries). The proposal is within the ASA the general Sewer Service Area. 14. The following questions supplement Part A. a. Critical Aquifer Recharge Area (CARA) /Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA). 1. Describe any systems, other than those designed far the disposal of sanitary waste, installed for the purpose of discharging fluids below the ground surface (includes systems such as those for the disposal of Storriwater or drainage From floor drains). Describe the type of system, the amount of material to be disposed of through the system and the types of material likely to be disposed of (including materials which may enter the system inadvertently through spilt, or as a result of firefighting activities). As this is a non-project action no systems are to be constructed or put in place with this proposal. 2. Will any chemicals (especially organic solvents or petroleum fuels) be stored in aboveground or underground storage tanks? If so, what types and quantities of material will be stored? As this is a non-project action no chemicals are proposed to be stored on the subject properties. 3. What protective measures will be taken to ensure that leaks or spills of anychemicals stored or used on site will not be allowed to percolate to groundwater? This includes measures to keep chemicals out of disposal systems. As this is a non-project action that proposes no chemicals to be stored on site there are no protective measures proposed with this proposal, PL-22 V1.G Page 3 of 15 SEPA CHECKLIST EVALUATION FOR Spokane AGENCY USE ONLY 4. Will any chemicals he stored, handled or used on the site in a location where a spill or leak wilt drain to surface or groundwater or to a Storrrwwater disposal system discharging to surface or groundwater? For this non-project action, no chemicals are proposed to be stored or handled on site. h. Stonrwater 1. What are the depths on the site to groundwater and to bedrock (if known)? The depth to Groundwater on the subject properties is unknown at this time. 2. Will stormwater be discharged into the ground? If so, describe any potential impacts. For this non-project action, there is no system proposed to discharge stormwater. PL-22 V1.0 Page 4 of 15 °11. r. CHECKLIST S pA EVALUATION FOR Spokane AGENCY USE ONLY 40000 ley B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (check cne)4(f1Th rolling, hilly, steep slopes,mountainous, other The smaller parcel to the south is generally flat the larger parcel has a gentle slope to 81' Avenue. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? The steepest slope on site is around the church building's daylight basement with a 10% slope otherwise the slope of the site is generally 5% to 8%. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification rcf agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. 7110 Urban land-Opportunity disturbed Complex 0 to 3 percent slopes. 7111 Urban land-Opportunity disturbed Complex 0 to 8 percent slopes A review of the Spokane Soil Survey shows that the soil is Garrision very gravelly loam 0 to 8 percent slopes (GmB), these are generally a mixture of gravels and loess. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No, there are no indications or a history of unstable soils on the subject properties. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Also indicate source cf fill. As this is a non-project action there is no grading of any kind proposed on the subject properties. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. As this is a non-project action the subject properties are not proposed to have any grading activities and is therefore not anticipated to have any erosion occur as a part of this proposal. g About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example. asphalt or buildings)? As this is a non-project action the proposal will not be changing the percentage of impervious surfaces of the subject properties. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, it any; As this is a non-project action no earth disturbing activities are proposed and therefore no erosion is anticipated on the subject properties. PL-22 V1.0 Page 5 of 15 SEPA CHECKLIST EVALUATION FOR Sin AGENCY USE ONLY 1 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. For this non-project action, there are no emissions proposed, with future professional office and retail land uses associated with neighborhood commercial typical building and vehicular emissions would be anticipated. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. There are no known off-site sources of emissions that would affect the proposal. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: There are no proposed measures at this time. 3. Water e Surface: 1 . Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site [including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names_ If appropriate, state what stream or river it Flows into. There are no bodies of water on the subject properties. The nearest body of water is Shelly Lake, located approximately, 2,400 ft +1- to the east. 2. Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? tf yes, pleasedescribe and attach available pleas. No work is proposed with this non-project action. 3, Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. NIA, this non-project action has no proposed fill or dredge activities. 4. Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give generai description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. NIA, this non-project action has no water withdrawals or diversions. 5. Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location en the site plan. No, the subject properties are not within a floodplain. 6, Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters` If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No, the proposed non-project action has no discharges to surface waters. PL-22 V1.0 Page 6 015 P nit re SEA IiECKLtST EV 4L LJA ICIN FOR} [` AGENCY USE ONLY ' i1 leer b. Ground: 1. Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No, Groundwater is proposed to be withdrawn from this non-project action. 2. Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (f©r example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals; agricultural: etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems. the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. No wastewater is proposed to be withdrawn from this non-project action. c Water runoff(including stormwater): 1 . Describe the source of runoff(including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where witl this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. For this non-project action, no stormwater systems are proposed, stormwater will continue to flow as it currently does. 2. Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No, systems are proposed with this non-project action that would allow waste materials to enter the ground. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts. if any: No measures are proposed as no system is proposed. 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the s,te: deciduous tree:(d ; maple, aspen, other evergreen tree: fir, cedar,q te,other shr`u grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, rnilfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? For this nevi-project action, no vegetation is proposed to beremoved. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. There are no known endangered species on the subject properties. PL-22 V 1.{1 Page 7 of 15 SERA CHECKLIST EVALUATION FOR Spokane AGENCY USE CNLY Mlle d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: For this non-project action, there is no landscaping proposed. For future development the landscaping as required by City code is anticipated to be used. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site birds: hawk, heron, eagle,rsongbirdsi other mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver. other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other. b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. There are no known endangered species on the subject properties. 2. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain_ Spokane County is within the Pacific Flyway. An online review of the available maps through the City of Spokane Valley did not list or show any, therefore no Migration route is anticipated to utilize the project site. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: There are no measures proposed with this non-project action. 6. Enery and natural resources a_ What kinds of enemy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. NA, for this non-project action however for future development electricity and natural gas will be made available for heating, air conditioning and lighting. Additionally, solar, wind, and other sources of power would be available if installed by the property owner. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. Future development is not anticipated to affect the potential use of solar energy. o. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Future development may include energy conservation features as required by state, county and national energy guidelines. PL-22 V1.0 Page of 15 SEPA CHECKLIST EVALUATION FORSill II Akan AGENCY USE ONLY �l icy 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so. describe For this non-project action, no chemicals are proposed to be on site and would therefore have no risk of exposure, fire or explosion, 1. Describe special emergency services that might be required. For this non-project action, no special emergency services are required. 2 Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards. if any: For this non-project action, no measures are proposed with this proposal. b. Noise 1. What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example. traffic. equipment, operation, other)? Sources of noise within the area is traffic and crowd noises from events at Central Valley High School, generally from the football stadium. 2 What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic. construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site_ For this non-project action, no noise is anticipated to be created. Future development may generate construction noise for a short period of time. 3. Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: For this non-project action, no measures are proposed. 8. Land and shoreline use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The properties are currently developed as a church/daycare center and as a single-family residential house. To the south and to the west are residential land uses. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. Unknown, the subject properties are not known to have been used in agriculture. c. Describe any structures on the site, The properties are currently developed as a church/daycare center and as a single-family residential house. d. Will any structures be demolished? if so, what? For this non-project action, no structures are proposed to be demolished. PL-22 V1.0 Page 9 cif 15 SERA CHECKLIST EVALUATION FOR pokan AGENCY USE ONLY 41000 al le e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? The subject properties are currently zoned as SFR R-3. f_ What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? The subject properties are listed as Single Family Residential, g. If applicable, whet is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? There is no shoreline designation of the subject properties. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify.. The subject properties have not been classified as environmentally sensitive. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in tie completed project? For this non-project action, no change would occur. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? For this non-project action, no people would be displaced. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: For this non-project action, no measures are proposed, i, Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, ii any: Neighborhood Commercial land uses are quite common in the residential area located at the intersection of arterials. 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided. if any? Indicale whether high, middle, or ow-income housing, As a non-project action, no housing would be constructed_ b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? indicate whether high, middleor low-income housing. No units would be eliminated with this non-project action. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: No measures are proposed with this non-project action. 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; whet is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? There are no proposed structures with this non-project action. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? PL-22 X11.0 • Page 10 of 15 S''' . r SEPA CHECKLIST EVALUATION FOR pone AGENCY USE ONLY No views would be altered or obscured by this non-project action. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: There are no proposed measures for this non-project action. 11. Light and glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? For this non-project action, no light or glare is proposed to be produced. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views' For this non-project action, no light or glare can be a safety hazard or interfere with views as there is none produced, c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? There are existing Street lights on Ott' Avenue and Sullivan Road. As well as the lights of the tennis courts and stadium of the Central Valley High School, d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any. For this non-project action there are no measures proposed. 12, Recreation c, What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Central Valley High School is across Sullivan Road, Adams Elementary is located mile to the west on EP Avenue. Sullivan Park is located 1,75 mi to the north on Sullivan Road, b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so. describe. The proposed non-project action would not displace any recreational uses. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: There are no proposed measures for this non-project action. 13 Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally de-scribe, • There are no known places or objects, on the property given a WISAARD search, b, Generally, describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. PL-22 V1.0 Page 11 o115 SEPA CHECKLIST EVALUATION FOR Spokane AGENCY USE ONLY 1_MiI icy There are no known landmarks or evidence on the property. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: There are no proposed measures for this non-project action. 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. 8th Avenue and Sullivan Road serve the subject properties. For this non- project action, no access designs have been generated. b. Is site currently seared by public transit? if not, what iss the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? The subject properties are currently served by STA Route 97 on Sullivan Road the Bus Stop is located on the Northwest and southeast corners of the intersection 8' Avenue & Sullivan Road approximately 60 feet in each direction from the largest of the two properties. c. How many par'cinrg spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? For this non-project action, no parking spaces would be completed.. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not inducing driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private) For this non-project action, no roads or street improvements will be completed, e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. This non-project action does not occur within the immediate vicinity of these services, therefore, the non-project or any future actions are not anticipated to use alternative modes of transportation. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. For this non-project action, no additional trips are proposed to be generated, with approval in future applications additional trips may be generated. Per the planning level trip generation and distribution letter that was prepared to analyze the highest and best use of the proposed zone, the noted development of a fuel station and professional office within the letter are anticipated to generate 30 additional AM peak hour trips 41 additional PM peak hour trips, and 1,616 Average Daily trips tofrorn the property Please see the PLTGDL for a comparison of trip generation for existing and proposed zoning. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any. PL-22 V1.0 Page 12 of 15 $EPA, CHECKLIST EVALUATION FOR lokn AGENCY USE ONLY ,ssAoo0*Mi1 ley There are no anticipated impacts from this non-project action, future development of a real project would generate trips that may have impact and would be evaluated at that time. 15. Public services a. Would the project result in en increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? if so, generally describe. For this non-project action, additional public services will not be applicable. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. There are no proposed measures for this non-project action. 16. Utilities a Check utilities currently available at the site: • Electricity ✓ Natural gas • Water Refuse service ▪ Telephone "' Sanitary sewer Septic 111 Other b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. For this non-project action, no utilities are proposed to be used. C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. understand that the lead agency is relying on them to n ake its decision. Signature: __ Date: PL-22 V1.0 Page 13 of 15 SEPA CHECKLIST EVALUATION FOR Spokane AGENCY USE ONLY .00001FVailey D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NON-PROJECT ACTIONS (Do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal. or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or ata faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented, Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, ❑r release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? The proposal would allow retail and office land uses to be developed with such development there would be an increase to stormwater, vehicular and building emissions to the air as well as vehicular noise. There may also be the storage of fuel with applicable permits that would not be proposed to be released under such permits. a. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: For this non-project action there is noproposed measure other than City code providing landscape requirements that would serve as a buffer between a proposed project and the existing land uses, 2. How would the proposal be likety to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life The proposal is not anticipated to affect plants, animals, fish or marine life. a. Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: There are no proposed measures at this time. 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? The property does not provide energy or natural resources for a business of industry, a. Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are, There are no proposed measures, other than existing rules and regulations. 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated ,or eligible or under study) for governmental protection: such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat historic or cultural sites, wetlands. flcodpleins.. or prime farmlands'? The proposal is not anticipated to affect environmentally sensitive or designated areas. a. Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are; There are no proposed measures, other than existing rules and regulations. PL-22 Vi.l7 Page 14of15 SEPA CHECKLIST EVALUATION FOR pone AGENCY USE ONLY Valley 5. Flow would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? There are no shorelines on the subject properties, so there is not going to be an impact. a. Proposed measures +o avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are There are no proposed measures, other than existing rules and regulations, 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? The proposal may increase traffic on local roads and intersections please see the planning level trip generation letter. a. Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: There are no proposed measures at this time, 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements For the protection of the environment. There are no known conflicts with local, state, or federal laws. E. SIGNATURE 1, the undersigned, swear under penalty of perjury that the above responses are made truthfully and to the best of my knowledge. I also understand that, should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part, the agency may withdraw any Determination of Nonsignificance that it might issue in reliance upon this check list ❑ate: Signature: Please print or type: Proponent: . Address: Phone: Person completing Form (if different from proponent): Name: Address: Phone: PL-22 V1,0 Page 15 ci 15 COMMUNITY & PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Son arkan II IG PLAMNII+I DIVISION DETERMINATION'N' OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE R 102117 E Sprague Ave + Spokane Valley WA 99206 509.720.524D- Fax: 509.720.5075 • planningr@lr spakanevalley,org FILE NUMBER: CPA-2019-0002 PROPOSAL 'DESCR1FTtoN: The application is a privately initiated site-specific Comprehensive Plan amendment requesting ro change the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation from Single Family Residential (SFR) with a Single-fancily Residential Urban District CR-3) zoning classification to Neighborhood Commercial (NC) designation with a Neighborhood Commercial (NC) zoning c lass ifrcation. PROPOSAL LOCATION: Parcel number 45234.0210 addressed as 810 S Sullivan Road and parcel number 452.34.4501 addressed as 902 S Sullivan Road, located at the southwest corner of the intersection of East 8th Avenue and South Sullivan load, further located in the SE '' of Section 23,Township 25 North, Range 44 East, Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washington APPLICANT: Whipple Consulting Engineers,21 S Pines Rd, Spokane Valley, WA 99206 OWNER: Advent Lutheran Church, 13009 E Broadway Ave, Spokane Valley, WA 9921,6; TCF Properties, 320 S Sullivan Rd, Spokane Valley, WA 99037 LAAO AGENcV: City of Spokane Valley, Community & Public Works Department Pursuant to Title 21 {Environmental Controls} of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code, the lead agency has determined that this proposal does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43,21 C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist, the application Spokane Valley Municipal Code Titles 19, 21 and 22, site assessment, and comments from the public and affected agencies.This information is available to the public on request. DETERMINATION: . This DNS is issued under WAC I97-11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on his proposal for 14 days from the date below. Comments must be received by 5:00 p.m, on February 22,2019. STAFF CONTACT: Markin Palaniuk, Planner,(509)720-5031, mpalaniuk@spokanevalley.org spokanevaliey,org RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: Lori Barlow, AICP,Senior Planner DATE ISSUED: February B.,2018 SIGNATURE: tor) APPEAL: An appeal of thisdetermination shall be submitted to the Community& Public Works Department within fourteen (14),calendardays after the date issued. The appeal must be written and make specific factual objections to the City's threshold determination. Appeals shall be conducted in conformance with SVNIC 17.90 Appeals, and any required fees pursuant to the City's adopted Fee Scheduled shall be paid at time of appeal submittal. Pursuant to WAC 197-11-680, appeals shall be limited to a review of a final threshold determination. City or Spokane Valley February a.2019 Determination of Non.Significanet(DNS) Nip' of File No.CPA-2019-0002 COMMUNITY && PUBLIC WoRicS DEPARTMENT Srri� sane LIUiLIl1l�G, PLANNING DIVISION NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING 10210 E Sprague Ave+Spokane Valley WA 99206 5D9.72U,5240 • Fax: 509.720.5075 . planning@spokanevalley.org spokanevailey.org late of Notice: February 13,2019 Pursuant to Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) 17.80.120, Notice of Public Hearing, the Building & Planning Division is sending notice to all properly(milers within 800 feet of the subject property, Publlel-Ienring Date and Tante: February 28,2019, beginning at 6:00 p.m. Hearing Location: Spokane Valley City Council Chambers, City Hall Project Number: CPA-2019-0002 Application Description: Request to change the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation from Single Family Residential (SFR) with a Single-family Residential Urban District(R-3)zoning classification to Neighborhood Commercial (NC)designation with a Neighborhood Commercial (NC) zoning classification. Location: Parcel number 45234.0210 addressed as 810 S Sullivan Road and parcel number 45234.4501 addressed as 902 S Sullivan Road, located at the southwest corner of the intersection of East 8'1" Avenue and South Sullivan Road, Further located in the SE A of Section 23, Township 25 North, Range 44 East, Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washin. on Applicant: Whipple Consulting Engineers, 21 S Pines Rd, Spokane Valley, WA 99206 Owner: Advent Lutheran Church, 13009 E Broadway Ave,Spokane Valley, WA 99216 _ TCF Properties, 320 S Sullivan Rd, Spokane Valley, WA 99437 Date of A J!jcatioir: October 30,2018 Staff Contact: Martin Palnniuk, Planner Hearing Procedures: The Spokane Valley Planning Commission will conduct the hearing pursuant to the Planning Commission rules of procedure. Interested persons may testify at the public hearing and may submit written comments and documents before or at the hearing. The Planning Commission may limit the time given to speakers, The Planning Commiission will forward a recommendation on the request to the Spokane Valley City Council. NOTICE: Individuals planning to attend the meeting who require special assistance to accommodate physical, hearing, or other impairments, please contact the City Clerk at (509) 720-5000 as soon as possible so that arrangements may be made. A staff report will be available for inspectiolt seven (7) calendar days before the hearing at the Community & Public Works Department, located at the Spokane Valley City Hall, 10210 East Sprague Avenue, between, 8:00 am and 5:00 pm,.Monday-Friday, excluding holidays. Send written comments to the Spokane Valley Community& Public Works Department. GPA-2019-O( 2 Vicinity Map 11._ I._L-- '2d _ y I(j1-- -_:E.-5_17H E LI_ _ c fn 1 I ME 1 la1111-N-7.1 I I I rent --Ir: _ limli mum. Inn Effilliii -I. - _ Au — ®IIIM11: '■i :== ■■�■ :■ 1111■ I1 ' used: �1 n SII l■ill l :1111 N mans „nil IITE ! 1 �'_� r■■ � = �rL — ■1■■1 j ;i:'j; i 1 �i1i1m1wii *' \;.' i` ma � ■ I J _ ■ 1111 ' ■■ I1111, I 1^4\ • ■I I� s■ -- e1 N1o 1111 ■ ■ --j*tj ir 1 �iI1 - 1111 1111 . ; ' , atr - MIMN i -= , '--7 iii..■ N■■ ■ ■■i■ — u11111■ ,i F 1111 r,"In v._ r ■= 1: .! • II ME Eci ida- : •.'MO S 1111'1111 mi ;r--, _ J. , ---::\ .= -----, - i W'rr - LI 1111 . Illi ,i'l -'1-----V- ad \ IIII IN _ Jr.__ . / ----.4 ' —:„..., ��Ji_ _ Ismll 111 .EI P i!IIt 1iJ•i ■ u i■ N2 ■%1_ l J J E. i,� 4ii ' il IE-11 Imilis \ .mi: ■■■■■ �� 111 f I I l 1! ..1111■ III � a E ii.III ■■ Tk----- c . - rNE � ■'111 1 ' - :on!! ■ �■ 1111 ` E ,,, I== - .1 =ion ■n■■ sn■sp 1 ni ■ I �� ' 1)-_..;, - - 1 1 , , I ., Mi ■ , 11_' still mil I l 1 (l r ,`' 3/2019, 11:27:19 AM 1:15,056 0 0.15 0.3 0.5 mi I ; i , , II 0 0.25 0.5 1 km Csv Esri HERE. Garin, 0 ❑penSireelMap contributors, and the GIS community CSV I EsrL HERE.Garen,INCREMENT P,NGA.USES[Esri,HE Martin Palaniuik - `rorf,: Karen Kendall Sent: Wednesday,January 9, 2019 8:1 5 AM To: Martin Palaniuk object; FW: Request for Comments - CPA-2019-0012 FYI From: Chad Rugs Sent: Wednesday, January 9, 2019 8:15 AM To: Karen Kendall <klcendall spokanevalley_arg> Cc: Ray Wright <rwright@spokanevalley,org> Subject: RE: Request for Comments - CPA-2019-0002 Karen, DE does not have any comments for CPA-2019-0002. Comments Will be provided at time of permit application. Thank you, Chad Riggs, P.E. l Senior Engineer 10210 E. Sprague Avenue Spokane Valley, WA 99206 d09) 720-5033 I crig_ses.okanevalle .0 . Val This email and any attachments rrkav be subject to dsclosure pursuant to Washington State's public Record Act,Chapter 42.56 RCW_ f=rom:Karen Kendall Sent:Thursday,January 3, 2019 11:59 AM To: 'Central Valley School District 11358' <Jrowell@cvsd.org›; 'CenturyLink' <Karen.Stoddard@ centurylink.com>; 'Chris Johnston' <criohnston@a spokanesheriff.org>; 'Chris Knudson' <CKnudson spokanecount .or 'Christina Janssen(City of I iillwood' <planningcmillwoodwa.us>; 'Cindy Anderson' <cyan451 a}ecy_wa.gov>; 'City of Spokane TIrrell Black' <tbleck@spokanecltyr.or >; 'Colin Depner' <CDEPNER@spakanecount+ .org>; 'Comcast' <bryan richardson@cable.cumcast.corn>; 'Consolidated Irrigation District 419'<consolidatedirrigation( cc mcast.net>; 'East Spokane Water District#1' <distl@corrrcast.net>; 'East Valley School District#351' <smithLO ]a e'ysd,org>, 'Inland Power& Light`<connieniinlandpower.core►>; 'Jacob McCann'<Jrnca461 ►ecv.wa.gov>; Mike Stone ‹t stone[?spokanevallev.org>; 'Modern Electric Water Company'emodern mewcv.com>; 'Patnode,. Brian PARKS' <Brian.Patnadi FARK5.WA.GDV>; Ray Wright<rwriehttmspokanevallev.org>; 'Spokane Aquifer Joint Board' <info spokaneaquifer.rarg>; 'Spokane County Planning & Building' <jpedersonespokanecounty.crg}; 'Spokane County Water District#3'<scwcf3@acamcast.net>; 'Spokane Regional Clean Air Agency'<awestbvtespokanecleanair.org>; "cookane Regional Health District'<psavage srhd.org>; 'Spokane Regional Transportation Council' stewart@SRTC,org>; 'Spokane Transit Authority'<katterstromtispokanetransitcom>; 'Spokane Trifle of Indians' <randyaspoka etribe.com>; 'Traci Harvey, Spokane Valley Fire Dept No. 1' cHarveyT a7spokanevalleyfire.corn>; 'Vera Water&Power' <kweils@verawaterand�ower.caru>; 'WA Commerce' <reviewtearri c@.coomrnerce.wa.gov>; 'WA Dept of Arch and Hist Preservation' <Gretchen.Kaehler@DAHP.wa.gov>; 'WA Ecology,Olympia'<sepaunitf ecv.wa.gov>; 'WA 1 Fish & W ldlife' cSEPAdeskCdfw.wa v>; 'WA Natural Resources'<northeast.re ian@drtir.wa.gov>; 'WAParks' <Chris.guidotti@parks.wa,r vv>; 'WA Transportation'cFiggG@wsdot.wwa.gov>;; 'Spokane Valley Fire Department' ‹insta ctians@spakarieualleyflre.com>; 'Chris Wafstet, MECOW<cwafstet@rnewco.carn>; 'Flutchiri onid16@gwestaffice.riel'; 'Larry.e.astwald p66.com'; 'irvinwater iwir}dwireless.net'; "leslie,king@dfw.wa.gav;Chad Ries<criggs spokarievalley.ar ; Jenny Nickerson<lnickersor7@srokenevelley.or ; ; Lori Barlow<Ibarlawv s okarrevape .ar ,Mike Basinger cmbasiinger( spokenevalleu.crp; Chat Bates cchates@spokanevalley,orp. Michael Froemming cr,7fraemmirrg@spakanevalleyr.org> 'rmlong@scfd8.arg'; archardaveirrigationdist6@comcast.net'; 'timothy.morgan uDwusd.org'; 'rick@modirr.org'; "info@modirr,org'; 'I key@liberty+la kewa.Rav' Cc: Martin P'alaniu <mpalaniulkasiaokanevalley.prp Subject: Request fur Comments-CPA-2019-0002 All, Please review the attached Environmental Checklist and associated materials for the followkng project: Project Name: Sullivan Road/8`h Avenue Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment File U: CPA-2€ 19-0002 Parcels: 45234.0210 and 45214.4501 If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Best regards, Karen Kendall I Planner 10210 E.Sprague Avenue k Spokane Valle'.WA 99206 (509)720-5026 1 hkeridall pokanevalley.arg sok<e\i,„ Valley This email ano any attachments roe?be subject to disclosure pursuant to Washington State's Public Record Act,chapter-42 56BCW. 2 l i 1'1 „ I"urstnni y xcellence c { • s CFAI QBRYAN COLLINS, ) RE CHIEF ERF D.619 4gh 2120 N.Wilbur Spokane Valley,WA 99206 (5099928-1700 Main (509)892-412S Fax Jarruaiy 9, 2019 pakanevalleyhire.com City of Spokane Valley 10210 E. Sprague Avenue Spokane Valley, WA 99206 RE: CPA-2019-0002 810 S Sullivan&902 S. Sullivan Technical Review Comments The Spokane Valley Fire Department has completed the review for the above referenced project and hes no comments on the SEPA checklist. Specific fire department requirements shall be conditioned on future permits. If there are any questions please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, Jacob Blanchette Environmental Engineer Spokane Valley Fire Department Martin Palaniuk From: Karen Kendall Sent: Thursday, January 17,2019 10:09 Atvl To: i iartin Palaniuk Subject: FW: Request for Comments - CPA-2019-002 FYi From: Ray wriight Sent:Thursday,January 17, 2019 10.05 AM To: Karen Kendall <kkendallCilspolcanevalley.or > Cc: Chad Riggs<criggs@spokanevaliey.org> Subject: RE: Request for Comments- CPA-2019-0002 Karen; As outlined and established in the applicant's Trip Generation& Distribution Letter, the traffic impacts as a result of this comp plan change will have minimal effect on the City street system. Reviewing the street capacity today and what will be needed to support the City's comprehensive plan, the city has street capacity in-place to support this CPA, Thank you, Ray Wright,PE Senior Engineer, Traffic Spillane Valley. 10210 E.Sprague Ave, Spokane Valley,WA 99206 rwria'hrfasvakonevai ey.org (S09) 720-5639 From: Karen Kendall Sent:Thursday, January 3,2019 11:59 AM To:'Central Valley School District N356'<jrowell a cvsd,org>; 'CenturyLink' <Karan.Stoddard@centurylink_com>; 'Chris Johnston'<crjohnstontaspokanesheriff.org>; 'Chris Knudson'<CKnudson( spokanecounty.org>; 'Christina Janssen {City of Millwood' <planninrillwoodwa,us>; 'Cindy Anderson'<cyan461@ecy,wa,.go+v>; 'City of Spokane Tirrell Black' <tblack@spokanecit+v.org>; 'Colin Depner' <CDEPNERu@spokanecounty.ori;>; 'Com cast' <bryan richardson@cable.camcast.com>; 'Consolidated Irrigation District#19' <consolidatedirrigation@comcast.neP; 'East Spokane Water District 111' <t tl c comca t.net>; 'East Valley School District #361' gmithL ea evsd,arg>; 'inland Power& Light'<cannierPinlandpower.com>; 'Jacob McCann' <Jmca451@ecy.wa.gnv>; Mike Stone <mstvnei spokanevalle > 'Modern Electric Water Company' <rt,odem@rnewco.com>; 'Patnode, Brian (PARKS' <Brlari.Patnode u@PARKS.WA.GOV>; Ray Wright<rwrightt spokane'uailey.arg'; 'Spokane Aquifer Joint Board' <Ink'r spokaneaduifer,org>; 'Spokane County Planning& Building' <jpedersonfi spokanecauntv.org>; 'Spokane County Water District 13'<scwd3@comcast.net>; 'Spokane Regional Clean Air Agency' <awestby@spokanecleanair.org>; 'Spokane Regional Health District'<psavage srhd.org>; 'Spokane Regional'transportation Council' 1 <rstewartOSRTC,org>; 'Spokane Transit Authority' <kotterstron sok netransit.corn>; "Spokane Tribe of Indians' <ranldya spokanetribe.corrt>; 'Traci Harvey,Spokane Valley Fire Dept No. i' <Harve T s a anearalle fire.com>; 'Vera Water& Power'<kwells@verawatera idpower.corn>; 'WA Commerce' creviewteam cn nmerce.wa. ov>; 'WA Dept lrch and Hist Preservation' <Cretchen.Kaehler@DAHP.wa, ov>; 'WA Ecology, Olympia'<sepaurlitPecy.wa.gou); 'WA Fish &Wildlife' <SEPAdesk@dfw.wa.gov}; 'WA Natural Resources' <northeast.region# dnr.wa.gm>; 'WAParks' <C]ris. uiciottiAiparks.wa.gcv>; 'WATransportation' <Figg wsdot.wa.gov ; 'Spokane Valley Fire Department' <ins ections s alsanevalle reccm>� 'Chris Wafstet, NIECCW'<cwafstetCc rnewco.corrti>; 'Hutchinsonid16 gwestaf#ice.net'; 'Larry.e.ostwaId +xp66.corn'; inwater@windwireless.net'; 'leslie.king dfw.wa,gov'; Chad Riggs <criggs(r spokanevallev.org>;Jenny Nickerson <inickersonPspokanevaliev.orr;›; Lori Barlow<Ibarbwo@spolcanevalley.or >; Mike Basinger<mbasirtgerJa. spokanevadley >; Chaz Bates <cbates@a spokanevalley.org>; Michael Fraernrning<mfrcerrfming spokanevallev.or >; 'rnlong@scfd8.arg'; 'orchards reirrigatiandist6 +colmcast.net`; 'tirriothy.morgan wvsd.arg'; 'rict@modirr.ore; 'info mcdirr,org'; Ikeyl i bertylakewa.gav' Cc; Martin Palaniuk'mpalaniuk@spokanevallev.org> Subject: Request for Comments-CPA-2019-0002 All, Please review the attached Environmental Checklist and associated materials for the following project: Project Name: Sullivan Road/811' Avenue Comprehensive Pian Map Amendment File #: CPA-2019-0002 Parcels;45234.0210 and 45234,4501 If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Rest regards, Karen Kendall i Planner 10210 E.Sprague Avenue I Spokane Valley.WA 99206 (509)720-5026 Ijikricsooltanevalle_y_ole po ane This email and any attaellmants may be subject to dfeclasure pursuant to Wasfafngtert State's Puck Record Act,chapter 42.56 KW, 2 TAB4 . - -- COMMUNITY & PUBLIC WOR1CS DEPARTMENT .,../"" en."1 - ,_.., Bolo,'NG & PLANNINC DIVISION po ane .000Valley STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION CPA-2019-0003 STAFF REPORT DATE: February 6,,,2019 HEARING DATE AND LOCATION: February 28,2019, beginning at 6:00 p.m., Spokane Valley City Hall Council Chambers, 1021 0 East Sprague Avenue, Spokane Valley, Washington 992G6, Project Number: _ CPA-2019-0003 Application Description: Request to cininge the Comprehensive Plan Land I 1,-,.• ini..-.; :,iiation from Single Family Residential (SFR) to Multi Hin111:•.. R.,..ill....ni 61 (MFR) and to ehangc th;.: 1.",::.a Mg sriil from Single Family P.....H1,..,,,-.i.il Urban(R-3)to Midi, H.L.111, 1?.. .i.yiii ,i! i1v1I-I.) ...... Location: l'il.:;:-CI: nlinih:.I 1:.•:•:";1.c:.;. I addressed :1!„. 8,!-;l7, 81'..; 's.:.. ::-1,1•::' I F. .:7.,into Avenue, ]4I. and '',407 N Niargue.,iu: I<IKR1 I,H :AA hi i!:... \IW etraer of Sint° Avc.-iniL! arid \...b.3-?.,tierite Road, rir-ili....i k:,....:!'.i.LI in l'he 1-...1.1 '/, ,,i,-:L.,..i Jo 1 18,Township 25 NorilL, 1zalT.o -.11 FL.LTt. \V di .ui.:0,.. .VLi'4:611_ 1.:1-1; :.. Hi,' County, 5Ar...A. Initglon A-• M'leant: Jocl rk ..24... 2.1327 1.1. M1;,......,P.II Aye. 1 ;Iii-riv i ii-..• \\21%, 9.(H:i I i; . ____.... • ......_. Owner: -Fury Ovsteclal Marginv IL. t1 ( , I 110 V kv.daiiii Way. iLiin.01;d,. ).,, .A. 98020 .._ Date of Application: (.:1(1,oiicr ".;0, 2C)1 s Stall Contact: Malin Eii.ikir.iiik, PI:inner, 10210 E. S•irkir.tie Avcniic, Spokile Vu 14, WA 99206 .....___ ........_... APPROVAL CRITERIA: Spokane Valley Comp!cd-m-Kiv...2, Plan, 1 i:.k.... I :'-ipokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) General Provisions, Title 19 SV MC /or.Hir RL,ruiliiii,-3, :-.... ,,,:i .rille 21 Syivif.: 1 H.... 1,1,c.rientril Controls. ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit 1: Application Exhibit 5: SETA Checklist Exhibit 2: Vicinity Map Exhibit 0: 1..T...•ro:nn.21Li I) Exhibit 3: Comprehensive Plan Map Exhibit 7: Nc:4:c... ..)1. Exhibit 4: Zoning Map Exhibit 8: A . .i1:cly. c A. BACKGROUND INFORMATION The Comprehensive Plan Map and Zoning Map aincitUnielit is a privatcIy-iiiitiLited :.ei.11.....;.i to el kallN the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Des ..1..ion of.parcol number 45181.0213 from Siiu:k: 7ainily Residential (SFR) to Multi Family R.,,i(IL:ntial (i•.111. .) and to chine the Zoning District from Single Family Residential Urban(R-3) :0 .11...1.11iLl.aiiiii,j Residential (MFR). . • The parcel is situated on the northwest eorner ef Sint° Avenue and Marguerite Road in au older, inauire :rivjuallypied iH IV', Til'.: r;!1'...CI is i'lliT:'1)11:',. .,,,xupi:,..! hy three sep:i ak.: rv2idential . :-;iriy...:iii... . InLiially a siiu;k: liuni'..:,, honk. ',Ail:, Hiii L..ii I'L. ,ile. ...1.111.111... ro....) duplexes .,..,...eri,-! hbilt ::! ilie ... 114' IR'..!... .7orhood to tlik... v....L.,-;1. :..1:1, ::.i.:-.1i i.,1 IL... !....11 .....,:i ,inu k eir-..i...-11-; prim:drily ol -;izi.f._:.1e fainily ;Ind Staff-Report CPA-2019-0003 .I!Is i. `~;_ LL..;42s. Two single family Ii imcs arc lotiiiatied east 011ile site onlh noi°l'lt rsr c.c:rrlcr of itlt_1 ,tie .11:i i+.larguerit Load. An eight acre retch center known ..-''^ti.c•nnc Mission {'enter is IL:t iii.tett {care~; `;,1: iI!. rit;° 1ti{,rsc: aI 'ht, irltersecti{1rl ofvliasioi: Av'enuL. Oul:,l AU,_onii Road, Tile site is L.r..itreiii Ir. r1L•ctill cd !'`ti' . eve:ii hirsirle;.;CS ini;.-[ticing Rite Aid, Ali ir!ido TrantridIine rc.iiL, Clan's Bistro, Iii '_ila .'; i ic:lor-T.r-d !,,,,2„-...,.:,./, n i-nnil s i[o RIO sf'oral a ]1cr srr.6:11 h:i;inesso.s. Ht.. i :_lr li .lil ]rttl (Motel, tt_ii. Spokane Ce-iter for iiki,ii;,.;:6.;.,..; 1.i,.. rtL, u:III Ilic 11S Ilc!-laririia it oI Agi iCrllture-offices ars. all 11nc.iLod a1llm;i-1i Icly' ril:v tenth Gi a mile north ol the SILC: t'Il ilio fbi-iIt side c11 f'e11;sit.7El Avenue. The ctrects adjacent to the site are ur'.:i31 Iti. i i,ii withjul ci:rlT;.s, Rutter,or side 4'all.i:'. I ..ii': `'Alto ri•'�',..Mic rind Mi:rgiieritc 111] :il iii' Classified as it)t•-1 il�'e.ess si ce. Local frill :1CCCS7:.il.' 4 `' .'I 1•_ :1 1+_L acce .: to '.• I !P4- :l:.7i .:.Ir:`' [Iiii rtL'ii_�LII' hillil <;illil to t1�' ]170re tr'�dvr:led I'O l I41'il'�5 within til:; . I ":,I. I ',l] trail,:: movetnc'nt. lti 11,SLO11 Avenue k-icatl'd DriC, [Gll.IL of a mile !.i}II!t ! I':. .,iii,.. 0 ':1i. ,iii.a'ii :i`: ;; 'ti Iii°r f ,1,Ii`e-!11r and Aigc-irnc I uad 1o:.z:trcl one tr::llill ofa mile cast of the :lli i:, l'1 •:l, il:: I .l r:..'. 121inic t .; t,;:iEiici traffic from lull local ."i.',ad 2?ne [hone! tliern lo .he arterial i'c:ml'' riS,s. 11.,;...i. .;.:•,i '..I iai 2 i3:1:4-.: S and :riiLi0 tiitL;l1]lltlfi'rl "tl 114-,her LIC•11 1i}' rl'.!dcut al and ctJllllllcrc1:11 i11;;1ti, I he 2'10. .' .velar,(' i)nllw •l ':il'l'lc (AD.') cooid IOr lvi iSSi4111 Avc.ii IC iS 2800 .::tlly 'rips while :1 i:.�::lir:l 00 ri:Indc'i1 I`UF A.I c'O11IK A erin' in 2618 was 12,400 ALIT. PROPERTY tNFOi.MATION: Sire and Characteristics: The propertyc.uns;9.1� iii a pai7 cl 4I,, 3 sil>.i:uic Reel in size with frontage on Si11111 Avenue 1e IIic scn!ti. mi':: Mainitor:rce Road along the ea,st, The lot is flat '':i111 resideniiLl deer'1anirll:ttii ale:-ii;:a the score t,and a large +Macantt i]le:I in ti]i- norl htieust corr:.er. Cnmpreherlslvc Plan: Single Family Resilleu..linil (SI:11) 1fl,ilili I SiliLiile Family Refii.iiidential Uri?iLt: (R-3) I?. ';rinf, I.lir1Ll ifs.: S'inifl4•-Iamil}' r.:wi einia1 c I sitili.ii,?,cif two duplexes and ,il. ;le iOntily licai:ie. I Sino+.;{, `is1'i,ai i''1111't i Hi:NsiIA., ['LAN. I.4:0iiN1.1. :1r111i #NT11....WS: (;'bill~ i'l,II;' ' r.!':c !;:tinily Resicicrltirtl (oil i' i.-•itii Zoning: i.iiii sic: I"al:li!y Residential l:rlsril: l;l 1. :!111 I li.i_:; 'il!1r?h: fitrilil"l"consistir�'. l..`t Citipioxr'- :Ind inrIt' Lacon ' I'Csidenc?,s ( i:-Ilial, VI in„ . :!.,,0,1.0. E and;ly itesidclllinl ($0.10 South 7_Ill'ri!r; ' til:;•.:' : 1' tr'li'`. Ikesliit:ntiil] >.:ii •l. 1`l•' `) 1..iiii i.';:'':i: t)ca;'lc' lirnil'' 4;r}II..i;1k_l}I,:iiliL_l'.. I..iiriiik' 14::;:i.I.1ncc1': (_I.IIIIp Ohio: Single l'ard' l,ic idenlla: (SIR)! P.,tglioual CommCr:i:tl (RU) East s (.ihriing; Sins c Fiin.iiy i.esidc2iritial Urban (1 -'ii+ Regional Colruitorci Il (Rt ) 1-,bail Uses: Single family consisting olio ,iii :.le Ii ily residence Sod co`.unicroial R`,aii and recrF"ati':)°t ll t:saas within a enniinr-rC iLl retail center Comp Plan. `]..itglc l' ltlliiv.• i.csiderllial 1;41 1 J LorirnO.: Singic: ('until~~' I{r-sic:untiral liirh�tn 1:k--.1:1Land Uses. Silt lie lali-:il\ c.O114 isti id sinp_1c' anal rein i:l[Snce 1111MLIVIPLICATIONS: .. rn -1,1. I.. :,....1:1. CPA-2019-0003 '111:: Ir:fcJne of the. site to `+°ituii 1 <1111i1,!., R:±i icl•.,nriiil ' oii I ro1 ercii:e 'I -1,J1 cic}]1Fprniing use. .i-1 -.1c fill }- ikii:ir:k.dia. ,_iulll•:xcnit:, HAI "]CL 1IliLCCI. L"S'L in the MFT( ?:c .lc:, -`l;l° r.cni.: el1a!-1Lc: Will al1(i\. iii ill:i-1i:rliiy cieveloprricn1 al a density 01.2' units pertici"c. Sinp.,Ie-faliiily Lle,,e ul]r:lc.Iii iii the \IFR ...-.01.k. w.,.;auI.I icy.ir,_: a rninimunl lot size of2,[1':1() square feet, 71 lie sett'~ticics in the R ...one!' incl N.E.R rote arc: ic:cn'i ,1. a Elle cli<u:'e would 11;11 hove ally ilnpact on the ll:l .;iccll fill nl of clevc:i'1:']Ilelil. .t.)1,...:-1. space wou][] b:: Niitiirecl lc r my multi I:ur:ils} d,2yclopincnt red wflLIltl l ENI.i:r,'.cl .II" ,I r:.•.,L. . t..,; I.t';'„i,il ,.:. Ih.' <<rass erea. The 111c1werl l iiil(1i11(J ]:ei'lu v,ftll(1 inc:ie -4. ]i-Llnl 51 fed ii' 111.: l..i. l011s 1,; :=,'1 !;.'t-1 in 'ht. N.1 FR Zone, See 'i ill}I(,'. 1 below fur standards, t he clirrl =e from It 141 l\1171 .id i'....:.°.Ill Ii ;I c Irin!,e to^I1: us.L II:::I All 11."1"1i-:.:-,: ,,u (Etc site. The MFR ieci-illowsa I iiii.,I' .,l Illulti-faii.il, ii.;..‘:-., 0,(?i;.,:-.hl:w11I +liliCL':, i.11,1sJ.t .::]"v1L.L. :1.i1,..11.rc rs.:.:Il:tic,.s, in :',('.L.11.,:;ti Iii the 411:;ienSiOnkl tililri 1 1(Il. :!-`L forth in T ru'.le 19.70.1. ,^,11'., 111111'1 i-id r 1, iir nonresidential l:L',I_'ILI„I,,Akio I!] l:it'. "1l:1( ZOL1C w1.I I . ,1..: ,.I.,1-IICC.l to Ilk Il:i'i itinnal n, ii i'L:.: 1'C- I.I:II Hi - 511 S • ,� 4•h'1�. ,1.75 - 1 r.ircili'-liG!1 f;";',LI;:Ihun \vin,:]liiI iiil:: :I lik. I. L ill Iti ; c :I ... ,\ !' irll'(: I..vt1 :,1111;id. 1.11.11:11 R12"l -..ill ili :1"111;:'IL:'i. ,.4):),'r Ic'\c , --;;Mt-...,-, !.: ,-:II t.):- IC:. I L.i For both rinrlil-1. li'11'.' ,.,11. iii:ILIC ;i. JIiIici !.ii't :l(l'l111c11t. HI, I:: :c-rti::Ilii!',p1 i!-11 i!', t! ``.ti. '.'il '[I.!I rl.i(r-._i c';lll .:.- rL:L k!`,.si I, I' Eli' rnlnI-lalll7]y or IIS;111.4'sick11t1'rll '}'I'1.,....1 '1.,. .1.1!'li, Ili.. �LL.11 !+•. 111 -111,4'x''_IC` lll-11 ;iii: ,-'iii:L l 1'; - Al. y I l-;;.: I 11:!Iltl.I!: in tlil' II<Lii i1'.0:;:,il .-.1.'1.,ks would H. ti11;c°11.1:"ll , .:LI Iilliilc](I to it i::;:i in li.!.: 1il. L{ul.i-...'.;1,Hi! . ]i,Irk.ing, rend i'n-wile tI_rc,:t:llkll f ,:1.:Irinwater wcaij i also be required consistent ' 'itii the develc•,; i [-i:: I,:;.,i&lislns. 11,c \IFR 1.111E :71`.i. sided to provide multi-farm\' I1Ui1s:Iig neat- l-II::iILL 'i:,: iiiItl c4']iiiiii rci:s1 i "'.1lll' :. 111x' !]Ic..i.H1 Al Cul ,`x,11 'll, ,In,] l:nl:rile transit. Since tlic, 1 :irL ] ii, ,:1. 1 !_Wil y, _I.'°._L.I011.'6. ,V'i:h a :.-;11);; e filMily I1::1] C: :MCISll!I.l '▪ _ 11!14` '-'ll,srrlr,;: 171 !.1LSIri1 L'i°',II ls1 the ISrII'::4i v','(l„H I..L is i ITlik Ii]Ll-l} lot. ttlttl'`c ii.''.'e°ir, !1L.i.'i)l. I!lili':i 101.1K. t]I'....ip'.r1ies will iir.YI i crir inkss the CIirn.To. ;;d"•, clL--Aii I ii:ic. Liars i icl1s IL, i1 rl;''.1' iiiiil11 I:I1111I▪ 511- ;',;r11111t'I',2::ll use or-A',.. 1l H` !vii5P ;. II11:!jci:Fiiginttiun" li redcl'i [epriii i i 1wi n L'SLiII!Ilc 1: ..1! ".:1,-;,.... .`i I.: i1y i..-..t• i'_ tlx:: arijJ:'::I'.1 I-r-:Iilcii11:!1 rsces C'e.ild c*I;- i i.:nce ]n1-.i:Lct]. ]Ii:ri:.L1; :1Ti1° Lek I.:,.L. !'r :Il C: I.,l 1,11.I4I„'';' 4,. •;C'1.:,It' '11ll] IIIS:II':I".L',l t'e.i!H.(' ?ii l Il'L;(I L°411":I`lnl lrtil'ic 'rata arid l,,--r ill rl' ' `:Ill` 1-,1i l', IL°' .,i°El i I 'I,: , •::10..:i iiii", s rid I.I11tISCa 1)1:::" 'v();_Ici I.IIl1:[ILL 1iw impacts l4] wi_Illl: cl.".Sni, Table l provides a LOrr1p8r1: 1] 0the d veinpnicll1 I:'c iiiitII]L°I 1!, icI" both a'eric°--, Table 9 R4& MFR Develo merit Standards C0niimriscln Lot Maximums Minimum Setbacks Density Zone Building I-I eight Coverage Front Yard Rear Yard Side Yard Garage R-3 35 ft. 50% 15 ft. '10 ft, 5 ft, 20 ft. 6 didacre MEP 50 ft. 60% 15 ft" 10 ft. 5 ft, 20 ft. 22 du/acre APr'L.iCATLor PROCE Sm(:: 4`lit'1-,IL7: 17.30 :PciIll=1 ]'r+Jti:cs;ili t1'I';leed'uresi1}theSVMC. The following summarizes keys application pros:c•rhl;c::: i..,etllti. l?rop.X.•_ 1 Pi.-Application Meeting: t icIoI1:'r c.-.:?'11 g _ .Application Submitted: 0k:10l}.:I i1,. -'.'Jl ,:',EPA Determination of Non-Si Tnificance Issue date ] .`l]i ii ! 4. .4.;'.I I+1 1:.n,] of Appeal Period for DNS: Not Appealed l'c irli, l ti '22. :'...11'.' I).[Lc of Posted Notico of Public Hearin; H.::~'1.1.:,:.1 ,. I •'-1I'.1 17.1::1,'. t:FPublished Notice of Public Hearing: L'Ii .1 !'-',- t; i'..::. I .,. :',1I',1 Page 3of9 Staff Report CPA-2019-0003 Date of Mailed Notice of Public Hearinu. February 1.3,2019 R. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO SEPA I. Findings: 1%irsuant to Title 21 (Envii-oiruciar.I11.Toriinls) Ski the. krid r I 01. 1 ii propos]' does not have a pro1:44E, m]vcrc: Livid ou EnviroinleriLal Irnoact Statenir under Division i:_'HCd it 1.), !rinirini:on of 10<S oi februalymad(' alter 8, 2018, T: cInvir)riinerital checklist, the appliciAlick, Titles 19, 21, nrd VN,v.:,, comments,and information on fiki iil 2. Cowl us ii ): St.; P.Frvir(7111uilla Policy Act (ST.PA) ard Title 21 SYNC haw been fulfilled. C, FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO 'LIM _cOMPREI-IESSIVE PLAN A NI VNDikilENIT AND REZONF t compi Lance with Title 17 (General Provisions)of the Spokane Volley Municipal Code :A. Findings: SVMC 17.80.140(H). Comprehensive Plan Amencirrient and Rezone Approval Criteria j, TIi Ci1y manorove Comprehensive Plan amendments arid area-wide zone map amendments i.f ii ri;ids that: (1) ihe propc6.0.1 iiHekcIntent b iii libstantia relationship to the public health, safety, Liici1 .c.iiori oldie environment; Anairsis:[and zae anri the regidntion f"-mid uses are ihhererdiry rclated to the public 1: c crc.q.fird to .=uLq e;Hefw.4,10.-z) and reApons,,v, (he .?1 T(1• i /l fifli ifie!ared USCS (hal iecessary infrowucture ivaler, sewer, etc.) we available io support the priJposea!amenclok.,ni. (2) Tilt pr()DOSed C.0111Si:i[eni With I.k. requircmcnk of Chapter 36_70A RCW and wiCli the portion of Elio Clty's ikropteC plan nut affected by the amendment; Analysis: Ivr::ii70f....r.,C(':af A CY (G. L•i; YOUIY the develop-nen( of 10,7-:,.:11 r icy ( i'egtfit:ii0fos. The reqUeS1 0014+7 th6 opi;or!?tri(.ij,; Lvor a businc:s and_ cornincrcirli S.1/P.:7:!1r reqUe:q e1F.01,5 14'W1 SeVeltil (.100,'; itnY oilier GA-14 any nan-related poreians of the City's ComprOwPsiv lqao. (3) The proposed amendment responds to a substantial change in conditions beyond the ptoperty owner's.control applicable to the arca within which the subject property lies; Pno-pt rffl Staff Report CPA-201R-00013 wilysis: properod P,c tocorr?.dwitliTh on older., i.17C Snlj:11.7:/), c4C0'OS S IIW 5ri( 1 "Ty (1 A/1,csio,,,i •". n' A./717'0;7 .7015_ The Treuni..,0/(ne Park" rel2iau?(.1 tire Sa,(.1s.,Lty f5UlliAlg,_ No ehoivc iac occ urred sihcr iLin..! 2( J latc ineliatri...-1 the applieddik- ike10 I'vide pruperty Phu) intitPUThal dA'Sforidior ex ix h vch /CHICY ;nrk:' `2.CiOtd,qq?ing 4,lc:( ICE rict:! 1.12 • rpiu,Ti.,112.? 491 the A"3 `;'1.6 °-.11 fe) the C.: OM Sq.ft.) The r Lir; trit,',.1 (i1C4 tht'Ci,dAk Oil1.1 iS a non-crin • r;.,+.0.,.11?, Ci-latE:f athilT,S thi! pPO: 0,1'fy (.0 I. COP/OrMeij,' ITI7c fiprononitylor Oh ?" v. /01. ari0,' aage MP_AiC.10,1if:M f..he pr.:pet-ay oulter to 1ICZ the property In the must (4) The proposed amendment corrects an obvious mapping error.,or Analysis: The amendment is nor response to a mapping error and would not correct any error. (5) The proposed amen addresses an id,nilic-d dc-Tv..Lielcy in the Comprehensive Plan, A ni-dy,cis: 6 T7'C7' ,' 7'17;77 ;i10.7 ir )711 to idelPt tenciav in the and del clopolio-PI.0.1r;ri 7 ro maiti-loo .7.0Lv Y .1 di5er-el/1 ( ' .'CfJ-CLUOkVIMCCSl. Hyi" ir!" Ac' IL' tipJa.ris"CIM.Vcrelid,irCrif he tr,..ror? H allPCC 2:7 ()CP'4? ::/?C :r ; 417 1 'ye ond tduidNfiert 1,.0c idcrugicd for a r, ri,,. pi•opoyed afiarress an ILJ'c1/ 'd Coat;y.:thet?viuo P .fioricycu. the : !EI? on r s:re (Ls (.r2%rc,'c'g A'fJ'R zone pvoiri.de fit'vt?.!ropo.,Np,, )Ji.:(41 L.:1 T.; ,!.'12."; I.idir n. C.c..rop:dri.;:z,...-c Plan (1) The effcct upon the physical environment; A oirdvsis: The..7furnpvto MFR Irjlj allow iini&flicommercial 11'027i a l'c.u(i('nIFa, ;02re with r ?eilticil #0 a LFnuii!-101i.11,11., 01qt. Jiilthrg ar",...'OS hi dhat c h-fl6riC Pr,,V2 I!! I ir%. r:Oidd i,??.:7.'ecise with OK: y Cf•coki,nexcial (ievcioluncn; soIm, iowact O1 the environment . based on the physical cha: io (2) The,effect on open ,:treams,rivers, and lakm:. Anaiysiv: Any "1•iated with I11.11! dpirneradi OH L ' l1pen 1,Y required.fri be reiiriw,:/ !),7/1-7C,1 Lyrr.r. s .,70e NirmIns, rivers or lab's Y . cpc.,.. space OTC,- ±;ii•,j Page 5 ot 9 Staff Report CPA-2-019-NQ _rear, fianking and side yards will likely transition to 1; ,ng or ku,:iseaping areas. However herewUt be negligible impact- 0h-, ri:3071 (3) Thr mpatibility with and impact on adjacent L:Id 1.1:-:LIS and .su r OL 01 elirck: ,4ihdhi-LiOW.F17 sy,s ii ill have yogi.?itilpacts On the adiacent uses. 211.c7e1c ." ' OiS . The im.!;i!iiaPot reguiaticms that 'were .'.2: were adop,..ei 1r recha-,.• P.... impacts af ih;.; • ; , ':" 'rtj "IT? on f7dPi H,r. ?,5 .r.-L-J,.`uses. 7'/t,-i 'f-L'gulai Oro. ..;'•• 11,..;ifHPf the heigirV: MO' 10( 'r1, .' Cry'(my bcki,- 69Kcihei. nehlaqd.ro..-rpiNg m(.1 1 Yc'Ji , IccOa? fS e I/h:-21 rc I h!'. com.vw.vcia ase would be COY:pad 1.11 the surrouridtk8 i•ins, lam .r-C"ia.i. uses. (4) The ad&uacy ofrid impact on community facilities including tiiilaies, roads, pubtic transportation, paiks, 1-ourc...t 14.in, and schools; Anaksis: Ill ph den y y developmerd will generate a necd,f01 r)?-01)er 04 1',ere. r. 7fi Rciv tats_ , be o'n: Is granfrii', ive i 0-1:"."?rand 0:1 r.) r 4'S in i2.t.r.1111:: r./.1 a . i?:i, rr Op 1,4 Ant" -.1/)1; 7..1'1 r 2'7r: :12'1-2 ;pool arid ,S'cjig•toll are ad within f Cr 1,. ,f• rtri • ;("111.17, c?;,P? :`) a J.:orCIFI f ; .11 (kr/F ihAL,...1 by the tai; (mf! 1 ;IC 24.4q WIN):PrOVICii,rS c() F),rn,701b !VS 1 r 'c neer& are ip .1re 1^ilfeell Pei ifirV 1.9; for evory ii.ccoom0oeicd..7 die proposed atheildtitui and F..0 imgalive CL51.til 1100 the •, uli (5) The benefit tc the neighborhood, City,kind region: Analysis: Rei-1,71,.elNumem. fire 21....)T,Nertv pro-a,..A• gororical comnur.iiiiy. The Lrbio r/tr ..1/1/7R h. fo4'an4,; (v. rgpm r' ire . rg 16012i (.111.d ."c re) p4'e..,1! i SpOIC(Me Ti'.'. i 771C: Chrff,',..4(7 Jr-)14,4L- p() 101 (he PtiOkr • uses r,'(,), in to tIio I1F.h1hflL!Ofthe SYMC `Jr' Lioic 'hr...:fore the .qatus. ; e ;.);',. land pr.1111,,A .1-or the proposed land dCrISLIN 12:1-d", PThir361 elf 0 CPA-209-0003 A nitiysis: Tiic zonfhg1 !IN uhr F.!'acre and 20 M.111; 1 .vii1d piii tO ?fr..p,-.7),...7e4 the C.L.qf i zinc:- (.1101V pOrCei f i. 'i !tire orrcel (i,01,...P4, ipro 7/ reuH7111:.. o. nee iiiase of 15 clircilin.i4 :nuts. I'17f.!prn.V.: di...m.sity anal 1iin7,1.e' f.,:c'Zir near ipan:11 and commercial centers_ (7) The.eurri.....iu and or•Jjeccd population dens ii . nd Aludisix: C IT N • (anticipate,Vpokone 12dleys e11 pcii er.r;. 7 ) (0ii e, i (; ;' A: or I 9 13 SpoitimR. i0// ]. he ociallh,if rif I 5 the poindoi,-ou d;,.rrsity neighborhood. (8) The effc:ct othc-. L milvNi /;,•• • ic.,,,F4)0,•,•,,,L.• 0,,„.!: fi•:,"/ .; 1111,2 7.1.; iprp . .Y (410 hr.!' iCk 'V 't Park, Resuzirce.s. of the CO For ihe ;FI.,(Yrr" el!C (1„.?!,„'l 41"12.7: 2. ConStstieEcy wiTh Cs:L. 'Cii.imprehensivc a. Findi -. TH. proposed arnerp. ..riant is consistent with "..hic fDllowing cie5 erunu.ni. 'th,e(;:.1::.: I II 1.. 1; :.:cc.H uses thni10 SpokL V:.I h...., P1-I 4H.sitv di dc% Hopr ;11;Ai;, 1)M.Ih71 p .1111:in ".11d e1F.: •. The E1111HdlEk1.1 111.H NI. 11:.D110: h.: I -0. 1 IJ 1,: 1101.1'-/:).1', 1'..0:Lh-- I !,,}11..;H:,, ;OH' I I a LE4.1 11.0!:-:,1°1!,....I'l?,.111!H:.1V., 111.1'! 11,..;!.:..k H- G1 would 114. 11,:vt•Ii)-Al...,eilt inconn.: 2016 I'LL' to the Lip*: zoning di rHt ;k1,Licss ch:Ficr.2.r.L.i!.-..!-: in the hurl The c...,d(mi.:141.2,nt is con...:LY./..:11 viJi diose eltanyes and the Conciasion(sY. o w.'th Cay's A doiocor C. ipr ..0?. 3. Adequate Pii : : dl1us a. Findings: he C.irijwili A::z (.1;\tiA) and the City's Comprehensive Plan requires that public 117e I eopiient !tic: Lime the development is Are?: UUtC11111SOnirrigatiou 1:Y:A P/1 • 1 -t :iiiVallcy Fire Distfic....t, and the ± ii).tcti.,:511 Lind schools 1Iii s Letter geneintes the cf the properly Page 7 of 9 Staff Report CPA-2019-0O03 wick:. i1i;_., 1....11-R Joni:: T1R., Ci-_.... Senior l'ilifie Engirieer determined that sufficient roadway capa:ty e-c.i... 1.s to acccAnn.o.:.(1...ilLl'..l-R.,{.....yliciriplatod new vehicle trips and the adopted intersection Lev1 ol..';.-1.1-,..icc would bc. riic-.. Slic.,Eilic it needs will be addressed at the time a developrnent ii.impost:rcl for the silk I . Conclusion07 IVR:.iJ L;„,..,,....y...-/..,:neniti.h..ni .11.-.U; rice oacqoar4 vif...c...,? .5,,..:rtJ,.tes at the time al dveiopment, D. F.INDINGS .' ND -('_'4'}r,,t'1 A rSIONS SPECIFIC TO TrIff31.IC COMMENTS L Findings: Sniff ha.--: ruo.,....ivol fici 1..-.,ublic... .coihrhcni...-.: io date. Cann:olds rc.,.. ived fol owing the date of this repDri. wil1. 1)c -:irovicii.....,11::, Lk Flininiroz. Commission at tiv: February 28, 2019 meeting. 2. Conclusioul(.$): NCYLICe. W..1'111)1-1.7:: I[CT:-1110. (.N01)11) '0,1)ti pilirishci on February 8,and 15, 2019. The NOPH was posie:d on s',it. on 1-cbroary 13, 2019 and ma i ILA on Pubruary 13, 2019 to residents within an 800 foot radios. l'ilr.ril 1.() Rccion 17.80,12013.U: the City determined it was appropriKe to inercli,..0 it,: uilini, :I%J._11 400 feet to SOO feet due to the likcdy pone nitcrest in the proposed amenclineni:. E. LANDINGS AN!) CO)-41.1,I;i5lONS Sri...C.111C 70 AC-EN(.,'V (101\1 NiEN'i S 1. Findings: Staff has in)!receive('any agency 1:70.mtnents of siglicance to date. hcceived CUritcat..“k Conimorttsi)n red . _ Spokane Valley i._licii_-.Tr17 , Nii...L.,),..!1- ',.. ...; Janircu.),' 17, 2019 lki]r10 Val leV L'i'..C1,1I F'1:1:111 i.;1!'i[A:k.A rig Y es I Ja.nivity 9,21)19 cli,..,. .:..1:IT.:1:.;!°'.,.. V°111,..•.: P,dilliii.v.. .. Planning , (.. ji). oi., !-.;.1....)..:.,:i,_. %,.'; k..y r,ii.,..s Az. l(LLA-cation, k. i.,..: Lk:part:tient .... 1 0 .\--1Eill..'•-•i:.) I 1 ' _ 1 ;i1ty i ..:IL.c: . . of St;:Lane (1:ityof;•_:;p:',1::H nu VE0,107,) Polic,c neviririicnt I'dail FrE:....!1 ."Iiiiii:!:.1:', 1,alic t_::Aii.f.y, [.....voi• ,r ::1‘..-11. !1 SL'31vices Yes January 18,2019 Sp..)karicCoiii.i.::, i,'!,i.;i, .....h- ,,,..,, acy Sr' )1(vhc., cour.ty, rn.,.. ili.., ,.;:.;.. :-.H. I snok,,,,,,-2.Coun'...,,,, Hr.:: Disiric. No. $ re*UMinh• :ir,I V C 01 WO ! co 1 1 111 1 lcallli 1Th*ririt i....leati Air A.u.clie],- Aquilll.Joint 1 .)i'ird _ Spokiiiic Trrni.....iit Atillool.1..,, (SA) .Sppk.,inc Rf_.ii.Join.ilTran:,:,porliLi HAI Council (SP..1-1:_;) - . • ' Washinvion Stnis:-. 1),......1:d o'.. ()Jilin-La-ea . Vvra.,:hih:21cil St.11:-.. Dept or 1.-_,:eology_pyrv'.3.) Ys Jarniary 16,2019 Washinton St.r,Ltc 1),{L:1:1). of Ecology (S'p_yl.,-..aine) Washington St:Ire Dept cIl I i.i.;171 & \Ili I'd.Lift' NAi.Thingto7.] uDc1 SI [C -2t of NAtu rat It'....sotli cus 1 _._ ._. I).— Staff Report CPA-20L9-0003 Washington State Dept cif Transportation Washington State Parks & Recreation Commission WA Archaeological & Historic Preservation Avista Utilities Inland Power& Light Modern Electric Water Company [Central Valley School District. 356 Last Valley School District 8361 West Valley School District#363 Century Link Comcast luded Irrigation District 4 Consolidated Irrigation Distrit.t 1 li:t,t Spokane Water District rt1 Ver:1 Vtter & Power SP14;ane County Water District #3 Yens January 4,2019 Spokane Tribe of Indians Phillips 66 Co. Yes January 3,2019 2. Corrclusion(s): No concerns are noted F. CONCLUSION: For the reasons set forth in Section C 2)the propost'cl aincncdrnent to change the land use designation from SFR to Iv9FR is consistent with the r-cy_; S''w`MC 17.80.140(1-1) and the Comprehensive Plan. Page 9 o1 9 Stioliane 4,00015Valley. COMPRFRFNISVE P1 PLIV Aii4E.NDIVIEN.L APPLICATION e. The proposed amendment adcliesit, in the Comprehensive Plan. STAFF USE ONLY • Date Submilled: 1NW Received by: -71,(,/,, Fee: PLUS #: File #: --LROI8 — 00 fD PART II - APPLICATION INFORMATION Ed Map Amendment; or El Text Amendment Joel Elgee APPLICANTNAME: MAILING ADDRESS: 24327 E Maxwell Ave CITY: Liberty Lake STATE: WA ZIP: 99019 pHotiE: 509-868-5264 FAX: CELL: EMAIL: iceinjoeCeigee.corri Marguerite LLC - Terry Ovstedal PROPERTY OWNER: MAII.ING ADDRESS: 1140 Viewlard Way CITY: Edmonds STATE: WA ZIP: 98020 ( PHottE. 425-327-1197 FAX: CELL; EmAIL: terryov@sol.corn 8817 E Sint°Ave SITE ADDRESS: PARCEL NO.: 45181.0213 CcMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: SFR •-., , • PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: MFR • . • - ZONING DESIIGNAIION: R3 PROPOSED ZONING OESIGNATION: • UIF BRIL-L I EXPLAIN REASON FOR MAP OR TEXT AMENDMENT(attached full expluna!inn Shce:Of paper): The owner o the parcel ssocking 1c: subdivide the subject parcel into fol.r lots I twee of the iot..3 would sitpcd_ the exis:i% homes alreerly on tilo t.--;LibX.ct parcel. The exhAir,[.7 homes aro ono Fionlii f-r-iiii home and 1 .O duplox units. Thc final w.:w lot would be proposed t:-)cnsrLic.tEl haw rhulli-family t..r;.1.. We ow requestiiig a chailgo from thIJLL F rnily 1-Zesidontial-R3 uMulti-l'arriiy Residential-MF. PL-06 V1,0 • PE:qC 3 bro COM PREHENISVE PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION PART III -- AUTHORIZATION iLre of legal owner or applicant) I. - (:/-c vs- , (print name) swearcrshirr that the above responses aro zinc.> of my I.:1'101:4e dg e. //7711-- topolig Male) NOTARY STATE OF WASHINGTON) ss: couriTY OF SPOKANE r',11:11 If I-3ED AND SWORN to before rrie thi (1,..1, 11% day of ar,i679.4. , 20 jSfr N WARY SEA_ NOTARY SIGNATUE Notary Puhlir in and for tho State of Washington Residing at; ,1 N NM&PLJEL. -STATE OF COU m166 ION WATER Wu 3 M COM Mf'5 5'0 1D-2-2024 " My IP11fif s'.:rit expires: ) L.FGAL OVVNER AUTHORIZATION: if lie dpplicarl.is not the legal owner{sh the owner must provide re fallowing acknowledgement owner of the above described property do hereby authorize Ber674541prk_ri,vi... raproont me and my interests in ati matters regarding this application. FiL-se Pfl Page 4 or.1 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Narrative 8817 E Sinio Ave Parcel No. 4.5181.0213 • • • aiT.• requesting a change from Singta Family Residenlial-R3 to Multi-Family ResideritD!,1%,Th Currently the subject property(1 Fircel) contains 5 units (2 duplexes and 1 single fan-ii:y hoi arnc.ndrnent would properly cl(*;ignotr the oxistric.g un urits near Argonne Road, v4-11.-_:h is a major transporticl corndcr. Tho p:rmc:ty r7;adjaccrd wgional co.-rrrinrcral zono. This zoning changc we are sed4).d :::11t-of; TI frov doinrnerciEl to multi-family before rrrovinu to single fe7nily zoning. One parcel ,--; rjo.hirie to the north ( 181_0201 - 1503 N Margueite) is currently supporting 5 CLplex units (10 dwelling units). We feel thiF. proposed amendment would better match the xisting conditions stir roundng the pa7cel. TN.., effect on ti physical rifivi"ortrnent should bo frinimai. There aro not any significant blnge,,,. in Talc. or vegelittion proposed by this: project. Th.ore are not any bodies of water in the area. I ii cur by public utilities including, sewer, water. gas, phone, and power. lit I would be used to provide these services.. id Avene adjoin the parcel on the s•nta and the east. These roads r.)mvir..lo access to the site. Punic transportation Tuns I LIIu1ld ilorg Arcinne an. , lying one block to the east of rarcel. ivy° bus stops te-iitH/ 0.25 miles to the rorthoist arid t outhr2ast. Thir: oposal would allow far an additional parcel dwelling units with!ri easy kiiq clistanc.e-to transpor.atien services, Our chsorviticnEi ul rt-2.ritd histipry `,-i[.K:,kane Valley chow tot str..7tiuni : aro hi iiqh ckmand and low availibility in the: are , CPA-2019-0003 Vicinity Map [ 1 ffil FiTI-9 !NM ' FE , _,1 I rrii-grsisi■■ ■ C rn ill att:l Ave.. �I _ - 1■ 11 �-_ �� I M , - — -- +:G 417�i€]F i 6tan}A Z Zt I1hh1_,5„„* ,z. p 11.;,r SF' C i 9q I Fti' :]N't'ttr`" �, r- I. Eli 1111 `S . gl.vs 1 c1i]t II . ■ii■ 111111 i 1■11111 ,,r�,,£ f; ,..„,./..4, ,:S}��,� E•Noira,Ko a a � ' IMN i p lig L q n�5 q=v�Y _ pfill ... i II • imil Ertkl•hSii+iaAte— =I "Ill -..,--"' r--- " Inic' • III . . Minn Vi,:Linn 1v:. y im -iiimm II ii.,, x ....r ■• ■�■ ! Ifl• j• L_;ijpui. :Iu. ' DI .., liii i;1i Iii . ill Illimiiiimm., 1 1111• 11111 111 191.__-= .11: fl1II!'_ L ix: r11111. iii to tiIIIIIIi Eli , E.Br. coil — — ----{ -r:Y� — ,--:a� 1 i 1 I r`--- - _ ---- s r 1 3/2019, 11:29.11 AM 1:9,028 a 0.075 0.15 0.3 mi 0 0.1 0.2 0.4 km CSV Esri HERE, Garrnin. ' OpenSSreeIMap contributors. and the GIS u community rna,q_.- wwrac r----- n.ir ecueklr 0 liar 11c 1,10 I Ccei HFR Comprehensive Plan Map 01111 StudY Area ; ,A. F h • • 1 E Sint°.vc • CPA-2019-0003 Request; Owner: Marguerite t.LC Change the Land Use Designation from 'Valley ovseoraF SFto MFR and the Zoning from R-3 to Parc;l#: 45181.0213 MFR Address; 8817 E Sinto Ave Zoning Map i i i kl i I 1• i . .,'Study Area . • d i S 1 1 5inln Ave GPA.-2019-0003 Request: i rre"` : owner: Marguerite LLC o e Change the Land Use Desrgnatrorr from 000°Val1� Terry Ov tech/ SFR to MFR end the Zoning from R-3 to Pa rce l: 45181.0213 MFR I... Address: 8817 E&into Ave SEPA CHECKLIST SVC 21.2.0 .0•••*Valley 10210 E Sprague Avenue +w Spoken: ;lane) W'A 9,7206 Phone: {.5091 7_2ft-524 i Fax: 0 Qt)j 721l-5073 psi mfflumwmf aTAFF USE Q,HLY Date Submitted: 1Fee, Received by _..:— {°ti .- PLUS #: File #: PART I - REQUIRED MATERIAL ,'THE APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF THE REQUIRED MATERIALS ARE NOT PROVICEn— ❑ Completed SEPA Checklist ❑ Application Fee �`y' ❑ Reduced Site Plan of proposal in 8:'" by 11" or 11" by 17" size `❑ Trip Distribution and Generation Letter, if requested by Development Engineering. EUEEQU OF G,HECIcLIST; The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43 21C RGW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement;EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency den/Hy impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. OR APei ICANTR: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal, Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant. requiring preparation of an EIS_ Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. in most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts, If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or"does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can, If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of lime or on different parcels of land• Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Complete this checklist for non-project proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IIS ADOITIQN, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NON-PROJECT ACTIONS(Part D), PL-22 V1.0 Page 1 of ire sl•.l'A CHLCKLlsI Millet' For non-project actions. the references in the checklist to the weeds "project," "applicant,' and "property or site" should be read as "proposal,' 'proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project. if applicable Comprehensive Plan Amendment - Sinto Avenue & Marguerite Road 2. Name of applicant: Marguerite LLC 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Owner: Marguerite LLC - Terry Ovestedal Contact: Joe! Elgee -Agent 1140 Viewland Wey, Edmonds, WA 98020 24327 E Maxwell Ave. Liberty Lake.WA 99019 425-327-1197 509-868-5264 4. Date checklist prepared' September xx. 2018 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Spokane Valley 6. proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Between January and March. 2019 per City of Spokane Valley standards for Comprehensive Plan Amendment requests. 7. Do you have any pians for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal'? Yes If yes. explain. If the comprehensive plan amendrnenl is approved, the owner is proposing to subdivide the parcel into 4 lots. Three of the lots will be rer the existing buildings. A new multi-family unit will be constructed on the last parcel. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. A comprehensive plan amendment, this checklist. and preliminary copy of the proposed subdivision_ 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the properly covered by your proposal? No if yes, explain. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposaL if known. Shortplat after approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment All applicable building permits to construct a multi-Family dwelling unit, if approved. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) A comprehensive plan amendment to change 0.95 acres(41516 S.F.) from Single Family Residential (SFR) to Multi-Family Residential (MFR), PL-22 V1 LI Page 2 of r,<<, Wane SEPA CHECKUST .000 Val ley 12. Location of the proposal, Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available, While you should submit any pians required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. 6817 E Sinto Ave. Spokane Valley. WA 99212 Section 18. T251\f. R44E, N.M., lying in the northwest quadrant of Sinto Agee and Marguerite Road. 13. Does the proposed action lie within the Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA)? Yes The general Sewer Service Area? Yes Priority Sewer Service Area? Yes (See: Spokane County's ASA Overlay zone Atlas for boundaries), 14. The following questions supplement Part A. a. Critical Aquifer Recharge Area (CARA)f Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA). 1. Describe any systems* other than those designed for the disposal of sanitary waste, installed for the purpose of discharging fluids below the ground surface (includes systems soca as those for the disposal of Stormwater or dreinaoe from floor drains). Describe the type of system, the amount of material to he disposed of through the system and the types of material likely to be disposed of (including materials which may enter the system inadvertently through spills or as a result of firefighting activities). This checklist is being prepared in conjunction with a Comprehensive Plan Amendment. Specific plans for the discharge of groundwater have nal been determined. There will likely be vehicle parking and the associated required stormwater drainage systems. 2. Will any chemicals (especially organic solvents Or petroleum fuels) be stored in aboveground or underground storage tanks? If so, what types and quantities of material will be stored? No 3. What protective measures will be taken to insure that leaks or spills of any chemicals stored or used on site will not be allowed to percolate to groundwater? This includes measures to keep chemicals out of disposal systems. This checklist is being prepared in conjunction with a Comprehensive Plan Amendment Specific plans for chemical protective measures have not been determined. Alt standards required by' the City of Spokane Valley will be addressed when the Building permits are aoplied for. 4. Will any chemicals be stored, handled or used on the site in a location where a spill or leak will drain to surface or groundwater or to a Stormwater disposal system discharging to surface or groundwater? No PL-22 V1.0 Page 3 or �I7 SEPA C HECKLIST MLI legit b. Stormwater 1 , What are the depths on the site to groundwater and-to bedrock (if known)? Unknown 2. Will stcrmwater be discharged into the ground? If so, describe any potential impacts. yes, it is likely that a drywell will be provided For the parking area. No potential impacis have been identified, B. ENVIRONMENTALELEMENTS EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY ) Earth a. General description of the site(check one): Q fiat, d rolling, fl hilly. 7 steep slopes, 1 mountainous, other b. What is tic steepest slope on the site (approximate percentslope)? 36,4 c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example. day. sand, grovel, peat, muck)? if you know the classification of agricultural soils. specify them and note any prime farmland. Smit testing has not been performed as part of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment Application. Typical soils for Spokane Valley are expected. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? No If so, describe_ e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Also indicate source of fill. No 1. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Typical minor erosion may occur during construction. Current standards in place by the City of Spokane Valley will be used to used to minimize any erosion. g- About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Likey 50%. specific plans have not been completed, A Multi-Family Unit and associated parking is proposed_ PL-22 V1.0 Page 4 of o .ne sF:P,\ C l-lECKL]ST 4.000 Val ley h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Appropriate ESC measures will be put in place when plans are prepared. Air EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY a, What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e,, dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known_ Increased emissions from automobile traffic due to increased density after construction. Some dust is probable during the construction phase b, Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air. if any: Typical dust control measures will be taken during construction. . ) Water surface: 1 ) is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? if yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. No 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 2O ' feet) the described waters? tf yes, please describe and attach available plans. N/A 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the sae that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. N/A 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known, No PL-22 V1.0 Page 5 of potiane SI_PA CHECKLIST Mi!i y EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY 5) bees the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. Na 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No D. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground: water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. Drywells and swales will likely he used for storrnwater dispersal from parking areas. Specific drainage plans have not been prepared at this time, 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (tor example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals: agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of sucn systems, the number at houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the systems) are expected to serve, N/A c. Water runoff(including stormwater): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters"? if so, describe, Dryweils and swales will likely be used for starmwatsr dispersal from parking areas. Specific drainage plans have not been prepared at this time. 2) Gould waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so. generally describe. No O. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Appropriate ESC measures will he put in place when plans are prepared. PL-22 VI.0 Page ti 01 �I{1 7 17 [)k SFZPACHf�C'}C1.[ Val ley 4) Ryan EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site:: a deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen. other J evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other Ea shrubs 0 grass E pasture El crop or grain E wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other ❑ water plants: water!ily, eelgrass, milfoil, other ❑ other types of vegetation b. Whet kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Grass. shrubs, trees will likely be altered and/or removed. The specifics wilt be shown when plans are prepared, C. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Bone known. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any; A landscaping plan will likely be prepared to meet the current requirements in place by the City of Spokane Valley. The specifics will be shown when plans are prepared. 5t Animals a Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: ❑ birds: hawk. heron, eagle, songbirds, other: ❑ mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: ❑ fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, skielffish, other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known. c. is the site part of a migration roue? If so, explain. None known. O. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None. PL-22 V1.0 Page 7 of w� a-n I SEP C'f lE 'l~LEST Val EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY 6). Energy and natural resources a. What kinds of energy (electric. natural gas, oil, wood stove. solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing,etc. Electricity and Naturat gas will likely be available to all lots for residential use. Specific plans will be prepared to meet current standards. b_ Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of • this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: None. 7) Environmental health a. Are there any environmental health hazards. including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe No 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Nene. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: None. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation. other)? None. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: trailic, construction, Operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Normal construction noise, during typical construction hours. Typical vehicle noise of a multi-family unit after project completion, 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts. if any: None. P1-22 V1.0 Page 8 of SOkane SEA CHECKLIST EVALUATION FOR 8). Land and shoreline use AGrvcY UsE ONLY a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Residential to the north, south, and west. Regional Commercial to the ease. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No c. Describe any structures on the site. Two existing duplex units and one single family dwellIng- d Will any structures be demolished? If se, what? No e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? R3 f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? SFR-Single Family Residential tf applicable, what is the current shorehne master program designation of the site? NlA ii. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Unknown at this time. Specific plans will be prepared after consideration of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment. !• Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None, k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: N/A I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if arty: Development will follow current PL-22 V t,D regulations of the proposed zone. Page 9 of �7��t, SEPA CHECKLIST ►7 Mia ley EVALUAT;ON FOR AGENCY USE ONLY 9) Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. The size of the multi-family unit is not determined at this time, It will meet zoninc standards, upon approval_ The two duplexes and the single.family dwelling will continue to provide 5 middle income units, b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing_ None. C. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impactsif any: None. 10). Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas: what is the principal exterior building nlaterial(s) proposed?The height or Iha mk,11i-fernilv unit is flat determined et this time It wall meei zoning standardsupon approval. The two duplexes are ere sceryr Twc sin9ie family dwelling is 1.1;2 story Typical residential exteriors ere proposed b_ What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Current surface views of the vacant portions of the parcel weud be altered C. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Current standards will be used to develop the site. 11 ). Light and glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Typical residential lighting will be used during evening and night hours, meeting the current standards. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? T yo'cal ambient light will be produced, no significant impact is anticipated, c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None anticipated. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: None. PL-22 V1.o Page 10af14 1111,M I',l'.°� CHF( l,j.tti i kane i ley EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY 12) Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? A commercial trampoline park is neighboring to the east. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. None c. Proposed measures lo reduce or control impacts on recreation. including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any None, 13). Historic and cultural preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for. national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next lathe site? If so. generally describe. None known. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to thesite. N/A c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: NfA 14). Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system_ Show on site plans, if any. Access to the existing units will remain unchanged from Marguerite Road and Sinto Ave. The proposed multi-family unit will likely have a private drivewayfparking from Sinto Ave. b. Is site currently served by public transit? No If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Two stops are approximately 0,25 miles away. One is at Mission Ave & Argonne Road, end another at Boone Ave& Argonne Rd. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? There is not a specific site plan at this time. Sufficient parking would be provided for the multi-family unit per the current zoning code, No parking would be eliminated. PL-22 V1.0 Wage 11 of SOokane SEPA CHECKLIST ,�M1ll y d_ Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). [VALUATION FD1 Only driveways are likely to he proposed. AGENCY USE ONLY e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate-vicinity of} water, rail, or air transportation? No If so, generally describe. f, How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Unknown g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts. if any: Unknown 15) Public services a_ Would the project result in an increased need for public seNices (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care. schools. other)? If so, generally describe. The minor increase in population would have some minimal impact on services. The services in oboe should be sufficient to provide for the needs of this development, b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. All current development standards would be addressed at the time of approval. 16) Utilities a. Check utilities currently available at the site: El electricity, E natural gas, Lwater, K. refuse service, 0 telephone, El sanitary sewer, n septic system. [j other-describe b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. All above checked utilities shall be provided to each let by the serving utility companies as provided at the time the multi-family unit is developed. C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: PL-22 L-22 V1.O Page 12 of �k n SERA CH B:U.1;3 f ley Date Submitted: D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NON-PROJECT ACTIONS (Do not use this sheet for roiept actions Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment, When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to resutt from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented_ Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? a. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: 2. I-low would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? a Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants. animals, fish, or marine life are: 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? a. Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resaurcesare. 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental' protection; such as parks, wilderness. wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, flocdplains, or prime farmlands? a. Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: 5. How woud the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? PL-22 'i1.0 Page 13 Dt '• +O� SEPA CHLC'Y�.1 ' VaI 1ev a. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are S. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public service and utilities? a. Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demands) are: 7_ Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, slate, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. E. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, swear under penalty of perjury that the above responses are made truthfully and tc the best of my knowledge_ I also understand that, should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part, the agency may withdraw any determination of Nonsignificance that it might issue in reliance Upon this checklist, Date. 10 3 Signature: '• " '"° '�) Please print or type Proponent � ��'-j ti.IUS�-�Oy � If Address. ' Li 0 ' }} } J` �-6 p-,,,,�aza a,/�} � �,.35If•�ti E� h `' ri'.s..� t � if 4�s i 1 � �1 r� � } F 0 Phone: Person completing form (if different from proponent) Name Address: 2' L .e—.10Q0-11.1 . cV0.19 Phone: _ C). 'u\ PL-22 y1.0 Page 14 Of ... COMMUNITY&PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT , ' pal'Orka S o ne .,.. HUILD1NG A PLANNING 1VIS1Oti DETE'RMINAT1ON OF NON—SIGNIFICANCE .1021D E Sprague Ave •Spokane Valley WA 99206 509.720.5.240.Fax 509.720..5.075 . planning@spekanevaliey.org Ni rmr i.-.L : CPA-2019-0003 fRuf.i.K.,;AI li.4.-fkii'LION: Ti .11,pfly: im is a privately initiated 0C-S-ic.ajric C2oinpr.:110.1 Plan r..; Cit.:Age the l'HiTte:111..iive Plan Lzincl & :s..: D....,:i:,,H.Aioi, Iro.:-.1 .SiuglE: FLmily Residentia.. 'P.: Mill!i Hmiiy Eir.!-,ii!!..::-,tial (MFR) arM IA) ,-.11.. .2 Lie ........ 11* .1)i.ciriei frum Single l'arailly P..c.sidclitia'c Uri...:in (K-3) to kiu hi Family Resident i: I 'vi FR). PROP(K--..At.. l!,4.H..1..•1i(n.: PnrH.t I number z, i g1.07.11 addrugw'll :1, :-.'..:'-:1-,', 8, 19 .!:'.;2...., 1' Sint°Apcii!ft.., 111..M.- -in:1 1.-,i)! .,.1k ..:1 ill iii ‘,I.,,V .'.•::Tit...i• _ii: :iirtki .1'... 11tic.•iito Ro:v:', Eiflicr 1,........tateci .!. Ai. N N. '4' of S,._-'.. •,:1 l'il, Towi::: ir.. .25 1,L1.1.11, Viiiimictic Meridian, SpoLr.c County, .APPLICANI : Jo oi Elgee, 24327 E Maxwell Ave, Liberty Lake, WA 99019 OWNER.: Marguerite LLC,Terry Ovstedal, 1140 Viewland Way, Edmonds, WA 98020 LEAD AGENCY: City ef Spokane Valley,Community & Public Works Department Pursimm to Title 2] (Environmental Controls) of the .S]Jok:Lry.:r Vnllr:y Municip-i_'. ; 'i'.,i-,-.. F . 1!..:.. i'.,...termiiic..ri tHil iilI p;(,i)c,.,.•;il iii...._:. ti.:i bi......• ;-! ii.,:.J..kii)j... ..;ir ,i,..-,:cani .f.i.iversi: iiiiE):.D..! on ;i1... L.m..;.;,i,iiici.i. ..-.:1 rilyimillnenthi kin,:_ic-J. :-.2d...liell.,...:ii1 .r.i...:4,-.',11. ;:... ti., [-Hill,t.!(.I tilidt.1- Rcv„: 113,2. (': -:),,I;;•.')(e). I 1 l; dix)sion made a Hi ruvicw of :1 coinp!zif.....d etpi..rorirt1el-1-mi ebeaklist, the appli... ....,g, Sp.,.1....!i-....; Valley Hi.rnic,ip:11 (..!ock.., `I''.tic-. 19, 21 and 22, it assessment, anir comments fri,n- Iii;.,! public. i,.ici affecie.cl :..Y.P.cri cies_ This inforrnation is available to the public on reciiicisi, DicrER:41NATION7 This mis is issued Linder WACI97-11-3411(2); 1Iie lead agency-will rent act on his propos:II for 14 days froui the date below. Comments must lie received by 1-3:00 p.m.un February 22, 2409. STAFF CONTACT: Martin Pataniuk, Planner,(509)720-5031, rupalaniult@spokanevalley,org RFSPONS:ME E OITIC:IAL: Lori Barlow, MCP, Senior Planner .. ;,.. 1, - t_..: 6':id.il. l'i'D PATI ISsum: February 8,20118 SiGNA.11,to.;.: , .:Nirtxt _) Alli.nAi.: An Bpp cal ofthi23 detcrrn fi I II l'''''' .11A..011 !',.12.1 1..,-, Sibni:fled to 111.1: COFT1MLIllit:•i& r'.11::.J7?.. Wu]ks ilo.ill i,....'ii;J:i iutillccri 1F2) :•:::.ii,:itilar ddys after 1.:i.e dale ksued. The appeafir,IN .:...e Written and make spc.:.ific factual olii,...!Lii{);;!-: if-, (he. City's threshold cicruilnation. pials shell !k. c:rifliterc-(1 in . . '.. conformance Will! F,1,...'[..ii,("L'. 1 ..'. ..1 Appeals,and any required Ices Fau>naut tc.the CityTs iidop.til! .1.,:: Sc1]....'.r1111,....(1 s`.-ial1 IA- •5;iiii A 'iin.. ()lappet] submittal, Purse.a-.11 h.i WA l97-11-58E„ appe::11,..; .. 11.:Iiiii,L. Fr-ik.-1 I:.: .7.: 1.,...vi,...,,,. A :i ',11171! t:.11.re:,:linfe! determination. „. _. .___________ City i.i .irml....aric Val!c..-::.• Febr:, ry Det2.;•;iiivicion of Nolii.,iiihk :ficc..:0)i-,IS', Page I o1 I Fil.c.TA:), Cr A-20 I 9-0003 COMMUNITY & PUBLIC wonics DEPARTMENT gay orka n BUILDING & Pa� 1wtnrc ?1VIrt]t4 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING 10210 E Sprague Ave -Spokane Valley WA 992k 509.720.5240 Fax: 509.720.5075 pluuning@spokauevalley,org Date of Notice: February 13, 2019 Pursuant to Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) 17.80.120, Notice of Public Hearing, the Building Planning Division is sending notice to all property owners within 800 feet of the subject property. Public Hearing Date and Time: February 28,2019, beginning at 6:00 p.m. Hearing Location: Spokane Valley City Council Chambers, City Hall Project Number: CPA-2019-0003 Application T]escription; Request to change the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation from Single Family Residential (SFR) to Multi Family Residential (MFR) and to change the Zoning District from Single Family Residential Urban (R-3 to Multi Fain]] Residential MFR). Location: Parcel number 45181.0213 addressed as 8817, 8819, 8821 E Sint° Avenues 1405 and 140711 Marguerite Road located in the NW corner of Sinto Avenue and Mai guerite Road, further located in the NE'i1 of Section 18, Township 25 North, Range 44 East, Willamette Meridian, S okane Count , Washitt or. Applicant: Joel Elgee,24227 E Maxwell Ave, Liberty Lake, WA 99019 Owner; Marguerite LLC,Terry Castedal, 1140 Viewland Way, Edmonds, WA 98020 Date of Application: October 30,2018 . Staff Contact: Martin Palamuk, Planner 1-tearing Procedures: The Spokane Valley Planning Commission will conduct the Bearing pursuant to the Planning Commission rules of procedure. Interested persons may testify at the public hearing and may submit written comments and documents before or at the hearing. The Planning Commission inay limit the time given to speakers, The Planning Commission will forward a recommendation on the request to the Spokane Valley City Council. NOTICE: Individuals planning to attend the meeting who require special assistance to accommodate physical, hearing, or other impairments, please contact the City Clerk at(509) 720-5000 as soon as possible so that arrangements may be made. A staff report will be available for inspection seven (7) calendar days before the hearing at the Community & Public Works Department, located at the Spokane Valley City HalI, 10210 East Sprague Avenue, between 8:00 am and 5:00 pm, Monday-Friday, excluding holidays. Send written comments to the Spokane Valley Community& Public Works Department. CPA-2019-0003 Vicinity Map "rriicl,itfli=1 1 . _ ,__....._.. _..._..._..„__,_ . _ _ _ . I / E nrti4na Ave;." .. I. 1 1111111111 --,-- 1. 11 I _ _ _ ,x A. i;l Q%'r'171' ilii Ili �� `' ►.�, , �' r rIw4I •v, irr� G7 Cid .. 1] r"c'r 7 CA; ""Y ■11E fur 6 riv e • 1111 ■■i !11____ ... , ,ij4 _'��I 0. ■1.111 1 MI ll ■�■m -� • ■ _M 1 .0111111.1 &pu1P �r f 1 �;�Ir.-^.inn hk F.£flLflU t= _ - ii c NM IIIII. Mill Al Mom mill IIIII i IlUE MI rWIrM ■ vX11■ zvV MUM NMI :� l' - - ■■��■■�: : `� ■ : •"S it k Av.e �— ■■■ �. -=P1�— 1111. P! 1'lP!'_ L a 17,4 ■ rc 41IMMI , r.11! WE C hula. .� G gCC•ne YV.�. f—•� f I.° [° 1 ..0 H "'. • 1:9,()28 319, 11:29:1 1 AM 0 0.075 0.15 0.3 mi 1 r , , ' i 4 r -7"--' 0 0.1 0.2 0.4 km CS V ESA, HERE, Gamin. © QpenStreetivtap cw'tributars, and the GIS sr ccmmurYiy • !' N/1 Fcri HFRF ni-rmu INf.RFMFNT P.NGA US GS I Esti-HER Martin Palaniuk in: Karen Kendall Sent: Wednesday, January 9, 2019 8:16 AM To: Subject: FV..": Ii1:•.;!Jcti` -(1I :..t y'1 1� ;"' I` : �':mk .,;(1-!-: FYI From: Chao! r SE`'nt:y,�y:, ;I lr,ai'i'y; l,IlntJary 9 %Il j; e;..l to AN,I 'rr]: kolii_.I � P-•rl•. I '-(I'::'rlCclllf[i y {lis i.3rlf,'wdrilll.}°i,ll'.: Cc: F:"/ .r�,rrl'.Iir > r:lc 'trk;.,lir Subject: I'•l II.J ,1 i•:,r i ;r-riri•It,rltS - CPA-2OJ'J'0003 Karen, Dr doe- • no=, any comments for CPA-2019-0003. Comments will be provided at time of permit application. Tirank you, Chad Riggs, P.E. I Senior Engineer 1210 E. Sprague Avenue I Spokane Valley, WA 99206 ,9] 720.5033 [ criggs@spokanevallay.org I�'AA This crnail and any attachments may scib ect to disclosure pursuant to Washington State's Public Record Act,Chapter 42.56J w. From: Karen Kendall Sent:Thursday,January 3, 2019 11:59 AM To: 'Central Valley School District#35C <LL ' t '?lits cr.tl.217›; 'CertturyLink' <Karen.Stocidarcl(r centtJryhink.com>; 'CI Johnston' <crJohnston spokanesheriff,urf,:; '[:fins Knudson' <CKnudson@a spokane. Wuur _orr>; 'C:hvi£t'r7a larisser, KK'ir): of Millwood' <plannirre+ rrtillwoc�dwa use 'CincJv Anclnnrsort'<cvarr461 aecv.wa,gov>; 'City o Sl.uk.,rlr Tir,rllf[Mack' <tblacic s crkanecit .or >, 'Colin Depner'<CI]EPNER a spokenecounty.org>; 'Comcast' <bryran richardsor cable.carncast.cc1t1>; 'Consolicl ted Irrigation District#19`<cnnsnlic]ate:Jim atien cnrncast.net>; 'East Spokane Water District#7.' <dist1@corncrast.nnt>; 'East Valley School District 436J' -smiEh[_O ev dcr ,; 'Inland Power& Light' <connienr; inlandoower.co�::::; 'Jacob McCann'cJmca461C+ ecy.wa.g ,>; fviikc S;_on ‹mstone t7 spakanevallev.org>r 'Modern Electric Water Company'<modern mewco.corn>, 'Patnode., Brian (PARKS' <brian.Patnode Pct }�RlS:WA,GOV>; Ray Wright.<rwri ht sracXkaneva1leyF:org>, 'Spokane Aquifer Joint F!;,t:rd' <info s okanea Aux ›, 'Spokane County Planning&Building' eioedersonPsh7okanecounty'.orp; 'Si)lkeile Cour ,' Water District P3' <scwd3@comcast.net>; 'Spokane Regional Clean Air Agency'<awestbv@spokaneelealair,or R>; aokane Regional Health District' <Jasaaaesrhd.org>; 'Spokane Regional Transportation Council' jtewart SRTC.Drg›; 'Spokane Transit Authority'<kotterstrom spakanetransit.com›; 'Spokane Tribe or IFL—isins <randya spokcanetribe.com›,•'Traci Harvey,Spokane Valley Fire Dept No. 1'<H rveT s okanevalle fire,.cal . 'Vera Water A. Power'<kwells@verawaterandpower.corn>; "INA Comirrerce' <reviewteam commerce wa cow.; 'W1 Ile pi of Arch and Hist preservation'<Gretchen,Kaehlera t7AHP,wa.Rov>; 'WA Ecology,Olympia'<sepaunit ecy. a. ov-.: .5i_Pr tir:s,CD_li',.k, t'JGrlrr:iI Resources'<northea5t.ie[iio •wa.f;Ov>, 'W," Parks` <CIIri I �,,'°r [ I > wa,goV>,' 'WA Transportation' <Fip;r;G@wsclnt.tai1 -?v..>; poolktaneVaI4eydire Dopar ton ont' {irl_I !,(i, r okc11-1;'. all jfiro rnm> 'Chris rai51e1, MI.COW' 0IT;›; 'Fit I: if6 1'II L ([r7is'hTstnfi Lt r r't I;Yrup ' psi v aldle-'i I C(lrII iivinikater Pohndvviroless.w.1 l -I II ':,;Fr:o 4 7'{ 4�)SIiuk rla`.'lr�?�{u ]fY •Iwiri4 Irrl ci urr { riIrl e =Yinifilcpr d1.1C'ue1 „- I <� �'L 1 ti I'oSL-i I[T� Cr.�e _, _ 1 __. Loll 1,,°Irlt}',,at I i. 5 3.' Iof is .IFu_t ':�7" 111.[. IS .s rir;c rr �t Slnr� i"CI;a`levallex �l_��; Ek).7 12: l .I ivI � 'l'IIc1I'I I:,-012111rlIEFT r.f'llfiil rrlffll l01:sr]ololl valley,ar(? f 'rntor L"•_ �S' I �r '. y,E-1{1rr'dr!os,.w sri.cii,'. 'IiC.1 TIc';lirT orF,' IfII[ ;[x5n7LTIITf,`1T1 PLV Martin Palaniuk<i77n.i .rllil.I�t.([r)SI:J k?.pr.,r irk".9_12> 5u.:;c1'::1: RC. r 5t for Comments-CPA-207.:3-4003 All, Please review the attached Environmental Checklist and associated materials for the following project: project Name: Marguerite RoadfSinto Avenue Comprehcn iV' ['1= r', Viat>Arn cEnflrni:l,1 File #:CPA-2019-0003 Parcel:45181.0213 if you have any questions, please da not ftesitate to contact me. Best regards, Karen Kendall I planner 10210 E.Sprague Avenue I Spokane Valley,WA 99206 1509) 7205026 I en all a voile".or }-i1t11 f1 annc I hi H.r.1a'il and any attachrinentS'may Sub]ectto disclosure pursuant to Washington State's Public Record Act.chapter 42.56 9GW. 2 Martin Palaniuk r'= Karen Kendall Sent: Thursday,January 17, 2019 10:10 AM To: Martin Palaniuk Subject: FW: Rcques`for Comments - CPA-2019-0003 FYI From: Ray Wright Sent:Thursday, Janurrry 17, 2019 1.005 ANl To: Karen Kendall .,;10r.ris1: i16>:�lr:l<U:7:r4� Eirr._, r. Cc: Chad Riggs<criggs@spo,;arl, ualic,, Subject: RE: Request for Con-invents - CPQ'. ;':i:l r ur1;1 Karen: As outlined and established in the applicant's-Fri!) Gc-,..r;;tir, y,;,ribution Letter,the traffic impacts asa result of this comp plan change would be below thethr: :.h.,ici YS), r ,-r, i, r. 41 ii, additional traffic study, The City has street infrastructure and capacity in-place to Thank you, Wright,PE Senitar Engineer, Traffic pow .000-Valley 10230 E. Sprague Ave. Spokane Valley,WA 9920G rwrr`c�hts�akor�edJley.ora (509) 720-5019 From: Karen Kendall Sent: Thursday,January 3, 2019 11:59 AM To: 'Central Valley S.hcol District 5 'Y:Jreti"fel l?cvsc,i.o >; 'CenturyLink' <Karen.Stoddarri ca centurvlinkcom>; 'Chris Johnston`<crjohnsturh1's,r'hne_,sliF r',f,r ; '(hi is Knudson' <CKnUdson r spokar,r-county.urg>; 'Chr stin, Janssen(City of Millwood' <pianning millwood vn.us>; 'CinLIy Anti eiso ' <c an461 ec _W3.gov:}; 'City of Spokane Tin ell Black' <tblack+`7a.spokanecitv.erg>; 'Colin Depner' <DPW ltrj s,p+ckanecounty.orp); 'Comcast" <i.ryan richardsan cable.cr�rncast corn>; 'C:<,risolidatcrd Irrigation District#19'<consolidatedirrigation@cc,:nc,st.rrt'; 'East Spokane Water District#1' <distl@comcast. let›, 'East Valley School District#361'<smithLC} evsd,o > 'Inland viler& Light'<ccinnienrinlandpowi'r,cor,-:: , 'ar,cr,t <Jmca461@ecv.wa.gov>; Mike Stone istane@spokanewaJfev.ar >; 'Mod r I , 'F , tR:r Cpany'<modern rrtewca.com>; 'l}atnod , Briars PARKS' <Brian.?atrivde- PARK,S.WA.Gt >, .Ni' if s;1 r1 r,.,i11@spokanevallev,ore>; 'Spokane Aquifer Joint Burd' <info@sp©kaneagu;fer.org>; 'Spokar ( Mrs , g. Building' <ipsderson@spokanecounty.ore>;`Spobne County Water District#3'<scwd3@comcast,r:C::-; Snnkane Rug iuna Clean Air Agency'<avuestb spokaneele hair are).; 'Jrp()Ic fl[ I�t.:rio Ii'. 1'1�'r.11'Ii Litliti' Scrokanc:: 1tiri 101i; I IrdriG 1.4t 't[OI Cou11C'll' <rSCc'.V ot:Na'SkIC.'_'r 'Sp-A:Ar;E rr?rl:si Ault.'only' .1.9.;A r'.; I!-iriil?`pp anc2trar,I It r.'rri 5ci[1k r'.E 1'ibc 1f lniE6ris' r7� i,ll,=; '1 rad Harvo � 5°,oI rbc y'.�..11i I iie Lep]. lti7t+_ 7' �Fldl .'�:''�T��51?:al .711F.}a11�1r1'rd:: Cillllf '(.'1%J �r<.I•,ri sir i ,richt I��> iElc.�:��' ti d r ._-- _-_. Vlln1 "e r,`V4- Imo,W Vl!I ate i ll�l:i Jf r.romYY>; 'WA CoIT111C[CC'<rfSvg,'WTC=FTI! caro"'Fr+ •h+r qO.'? �hr1t _JC'Flt ti Arc11..rici I11.:1 f 11 ' cvatiarp I> rr fn? r r � - Y' Iw Jt l 1 frF'iDAHP.wa.g04'7; ' Ecuii.r(y,i 1y.11'Fil: <SL2VCCILrfili;�l}'t'y+.'Jtrc! �?r,:r:; 'l�rriaE'•. Fish "VOA N lI Resources'<IirlriryFsrfft +p.iL'ri(rr)yll'ir.Wd ?.o•y?; r:1 f ri i <Chri_4•r.-.Ilidt-gt_iPiirarks�k.ya.k ) F'•, Iri•1?r`,11ortatlr.in' `-- IggC..(y.• v•l°ri'.LLd t,uv?. 'Spokane galley FIY'' Dc•p]rtrlil'r..r' [Ir.S,'7C`I'f,Ii7TI.$ S�fI�I� SrIELF[�I1PSrIIri CIrTI^` '1.. lrIS Wat:itc•1., r••/,[COW' ` c.v., f.;tr_1(ir'in2wco.00r'il>t IHutc:hirisOrli :1GinlcLw stofike r7c'C l e'ryd r tui llti(rdp6t1 corn, 1ritn F'tc rifuwil 1wiroless.net'; dIeS:1 1,.nr, i'],Jfk+,4^+rs.trl ; cha. (.IF'I.ti Ci II't,5` j1CYl rl "l ill 'f.r.! i.} IC I!ny illr.l•Ccra'i inickt'rSon spot D e 'I : 'i' r:r-,> Lori Barley., < li2?f C1"JS+ i1C . I:i 11T„ MikeInti, F': l r 'rT !1:T`Iri„tr(L'rir)I;iirl_,_Jdlle,p'.Gr };ChEt Pate•F 5 cr'' I•r",IC.h.:l.1 i me Ii,ni III, s ni:oeI1lwrrrirl, tY nrP( l: IE_f:._':_srg m 1arlt;fr4cCftlS.o ; 'or.11r lrly +('4rllztJili)rIL�I5tF1 �CYnI=35f_r1E't'+ '#imflthy.mOrtelll@)wV5L.crg; rick@incdif1.i}rf;'F ':f' t1��i111G[.iirr..fr `; 'I key.' )1:botylJll.r°w gov' Cc: martin Polariuk<i,102lanil.Jl ('7a5Eo1 w,rlc? I!tv.org7 Subject: Iieque4t for(.nrnrrl it,- [-I'r,• ;r;:l I S.1-UOL15 All, Please review the =irilp: ;I :.,i' •:;1,1i:•:'r'fzJ117;: I LIi'-I and materials for the following project: Project Name'. Mlarguerilr f+t srl,'; r ,i i l , I°,'i• is.r ti:y;e Plan Map Amendment File CPA-2019.0003 Parcel.:45181.0 213 If you have any questions, please do not hesitxo Best regards, t<r,rrr s'.r'..rirlall I Planner r .:';o.:racile Avenue I Srrekane vailayd WA 99206 •'o26r I IkelndalI okanev Ilev.or This eriAti and any attachments may he subject to ,,',1'rar"'ir .1cin State's Public Record Act,chapter 42.56 RCW. To: Karen Kendall (City of Spokane Valley- Community Development} CC: From: Colin D pner Date: Friday, January 18, 2019 Flanning!Building #: Subject: CPA-2019-00D3 Stage: Phase: Schucks Auto Addition Address: FADI The Spokane County Environmental Services Department has no objection to the finalization of the above mentioned project. • Q- • ."••• ' 1)4kE - -6 4,SY AdM STAR OF WASHINcToN DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY 4601 N Monroe Street e. Spokane. Washin3torf 9920S-129.i (509)329-34W January 16, 2019 Ms.Karen Kendall platmer City of Spokane Valley W210 k. S1:.;a2..tir; Ave. Spokani.: WA 99206 Re: Sino Avenue Comprehensive Plan Amendrnuit, CP A,:2019-0003 Der TIuHk y(.311 cc..swnents ret..TJ1r,L . pi,:po...sN to. chlin.uct thc CoriH Van Lii 1!.ttit,;,ii I Pin -5-.irwly; I ',..Liiiy1;4;s'icle-nial (SIT) to Mithi Fan '' . Resitlent,..11 II l'ropts.;.; ;r1.; L iiI 'I IIILIV diSLI I 111)111 Fart!: PcSidffiti31 1_11"kafi Muir, Fain•ly N.I Li Proponeml. Nialvicri!e ILL(H 1 i Deparim,:.nt of 1..r..,o[ogy ;; rho documents tn1(1 OK! 1.01 il;rumis: \N:A1.c,..1 1)rograrn— Sala'mon AthilillS (509) L329-3610 You must use prop L1 ,2-1-oNion aml sediment coronpl praotiecs on the 4...onstruaion site and adjacent 27CriS tO pieveriL Upland SCN:fill'CrIL: sur CaCC; Wdtcr. 1 ucI storno,val. i. 0D-3i naiices will 1)3 ov sprxific rc.rdiliwnINItS. Also, refer to the Storn:c.vai.e.r tylanual for bkstern Wasliiuonn htto:/,iyivo.......t..;...riv.v, tn,...:Trcler_:-dnisiv_cp".9.e.rdii,;,.al.i2u/e:ci.iL.;..erit_niaritialirriaritial.11tuni. All greund clki°_it'i24:-.d by corisiinction activitEc:.; iii Lic Li Hi I W hoi appropHatc, use native vegetation typical i [the i :most rep.i3tFL.r rI I t1C..V., dry wells and c; 0...ittt tlw t lneterrrounJ injection Col riogi Lin; (01(i) at Del)arimord ;:i crior discharge from the elks) must comply will., ri!. (nonendangerment standard) al the tor of[11;1. r:06,11:: L1n I.:astern Regional Office UIC Coordinator, LyiiDfc-clinis ail at Ltyn.Doremusiriaecy.wa.nry. Y011al ..!1:atioris- Perraii$/Guid9nce-technical-asqstanc.c.el:Pc:cmrourIci-il!i.4 for registration Forms and further inforn-Lat'A..R.6 Ms. Karen Kendall January 16,2019 Page 2 d. (1-tarce of polluting matter to waters or `,A;a!•,1-'ngton. Ar 1c of cdi tvroff or other pol:lutanty to 'IC tLout Ii! vi:,1.:Jiori of of the ke.vised (7de of 173-'::01A of the Wahington WatcridI FIs -.'-;urface Wasilinipori aril is subjeGi toenfori...„.:rivnt Even on projects that do not require a permit, the liscliarpe Of po!ltiring matter to waters of the state of Washington is prohibited and adequato eroon mid sediment control measures should beutilized. Etiviron tal Policv Act (SEM) HesiJiri ;iLIIfor review. L:1). rhey do not you trpust yoa Ililist eiIil Lfl Olda to C;irry Out the proposed ;:ichcij uiii. tIie appropriate staff listed above it-you have.any questions or would like to the.sc corrnents. lkpartilato II 'hid 0 iTIGU (Ecology LiIc 20]900028) fit' fYhagLici. bl • Matin PaIaniuk [to in: Koren Kendall Scut: 3,2419 2:12 PM 1o: r•. ,riir Pi! r;'Yi rk Subject: I ,1! [EXTERNALTF;e:lrar?rt far Corn rnm - CPA-2019-0003 FYI: From:Ostwald, Larry E, [ma ilto_Larry_E_OstwaId@up66.com] Sent:Thursday,January 3, 2019 12:34 PM To: Karen Kendall <kkerrdalltzspoknevalley.org> Subject: Re: jE TE.R AL]Request for Comments - CPA-2019-0003 No impact to Yel'ovostone Pipe Line Company. Sent from my [Phone On Jan 3,2019, at 1:20 PM, Karen Kendall<k1cendall@spokanevalleV.or1>wrote: All, Please r vic v,,;.hr! ttached Environmental Checklist and associated materials for the following project: pr(Yjr't1 Narnv-': iv art,or!rite Ro.rd/S into Avenue Comprehensive Plan MapAmendmerlt s: lc!4: CP'A-:![119-OO J- pill-Lel:45181.0213 H you have any queS'ion , pleas+ riO real lresili:te tri cooEdCt rrre, Bcs1 records, Karen K r,d !I I F I rt 10210 i'..c:Jo 1 1II°: rwcanuC I ':5:i:H: `,°%511 '',-WA 99206 (Fog!72C ;If[r Y4 i; Ir: ,l:r:• :v:o!I: car[ Mir :ou_ !°.c,a;r;�1... •..1.�Yilrl r;rYl�:atrzii.�i:,.. .r .i;r.::;I��•.Y-lana � Iu c..r I I a:,air, .,..'°.-rr;ril. , ,.,�..Il.r ..r,r:, ; [ ,_ 1 1:-!.E..] �4 :��_•�ril+i llfa.;°j ;�I.i,°t iw° ...i[6• .�Y,C . :CPA Martin Palaniuk n: Karen Kendall Sent: Monday,January 7, 2019 7:43 AM To: Martin Palaniuk Subject: FW: Request for Comments - CPA-7019-0003 Best regards, Karen Kendall I Planr.ar (509)720-55026 I Iticeridall 5 an val e Spokane This email aria'any attachments may be su biidct to disclasure pursuant to Washington State's Public Record,qct,chapter 4,2,56 ROW. From: Kelly Williquette jmailto:kwilligraettegiscwd3.orgl Sent: Friday, January 4, 2019 10:41 AM To: Karen Kendall <kkendalli@spakanevailey_org Subject: RE: Request for Comments -CPA.2019-0003 - Karen, SCWO 3 has no comments at this time. Thank you, 0;� at Y Kelly Williquette, General Manager - Spokane County Water District# 3 1225 N.Yard]ey St. Spokane Valley, A k 9-9212 ‘ ,,,,�v Offic : (5O) 536-0121 Fax (5O)534-3760 or + ail: inti lliqu5tte sc'wd3_org ;nifty, �t'l,pl From: Karen Kendall maifto:kken _ p___ nevailey,org] sent:Thursday, January 03, 201911:59 AM To: 'Central Valley School District#356'<.rowell cvsd.o >; 'Ce nturyLink''Karen.Stoddardcenturyllnk com ; 'Chris 'nhnston'‹g'oF,nstofC soaolka iesheriff.or-g>; 'Chris Knudson'<CKnudson @ s akanecount ,or >; 'Christina Jan r1rs{City '�lillwoad'<plenrtin �mjIIwoodwa.us>; 'Cindy Anderson' c 46.1( eci.wa.gov>; `City of Spokane Tirrell 1 IK rl,'` ctblacks okar►ecit ; 'Colin Depner' <CCEPNEF s okarrecaunt ,or >; "Comcast' (1 an - hardsan a@cable,comcast.com>; 'Consolidated Irrigation District#19'<consol rri ation r,,rKast,nr); 'East Spokane WA ter District#1' ‹di:stl corrrcast.nef>; 'East Valley School I]istrict#301' <smititape,Sd,or > 'Irrl,in. afrvdi'r s; t.r;lli' :CC.17111 l e ? .I I;'t'(]t1[TL1+f Y.I:Cm>; d .g v>; ,vIIIC tort": IL:cCI'Ic► f C rl, "i'.. r_I Y I lflii oCU.CC�,I'17� "pr.t.r1C,de, 1 [i ii ii Y1_R1 j ry J <rll .y111cI S€.C. 1 _ll it IItI iC71rt, BOaCd I' I ! '-``.r'illt<rb I { i' �t`rr:�I' �all�:.� rrr�>; I BJilrg° r cour k pokane { it iiii�-•" t dr§ter [Ask- id _t i1: 5pc l' -ne Regional Clean Ai: i T,e irry' ,r-,�I;�trlt� I�"t,i§�n�l lic•e�ilh f} .�t'icl I . ,NaneTr.r Ir°III:' 1 :' r. t:lfll5 ok la tP'�n IttCrD`TT t;'11 111 Tribe Of Indians' ��'- • � Firt .com�• 'Vera ; if � 11 l� IlrrV r, Ir :1 1 'WA , kh'ril>'"Frac' I I,c 'r I I' r , 7tr 'il Y I � � • sflrlu•a i k�r3�:'-�kanetrll`k ._ ..71 ',� � l -li"Itl v III 'I•,'If Y1t3 '`l�}, Dept of W.-7-.;ter ' ‹i: V:rd rrhYreraV,n-i-' III.:+.: , s-i i, 'WA y" ei I r i I l t,,, Arch and 11:!4 I'reser'.•:illort Cr3rfl":il l l C'Ilit [ 'L_ tIII _,'` Fish & 1r 1 'Arks' CChr .k;U1ClCt�� 7 r{ yyr irII� Rie Department' <inst}—I �rCkIlSirlf} '1fl tiri�Il: V7f _._. iritr_iinsoni, ,( nrr D[r;ir rl t i, It . In - t 511ti jiq Xir.Li:..F V'fChadEic 's !Pro' t I Sr ;;,[ III + r.`.£ I tUrilr.I;nPl2'dc�liey.Lrn7; r z � ! N i Li�p�ifli [�Ii' y le', .I{[.' 13ru5inrt"'I fl r'c Sl rl ,.Y.il`�. V 1 .! �•^ § lle !' alll"'S vlii.lelci t'1-eetri lrl Inv;<piFr _ —_ _._ A tn`aCCrp��5t.r3Gt': 'tIIt1Ui.17~r.rM`I['r�s�"�Ifa�v4w4rl•:lr�?.I. rlrf i�JlTlt,iti;� e I 'i;Y J�r�1rt14dirf.4rP; 'orcil-clri v irrlf�ri i ,r Cc: Martini Palin 1IiJ( r_>li list rrk( s ak .n�vall v,orP Subject: F NIuc,t#ar Comments- CPA-2D1'7.)-0003 All, Please review the a'ttacl'ri.':i I_ 'V 11 .i i 1,IL"I 1hetktist and associated nnateriais for the following project; ProjoCt Name: Marguerite itgad/Sir's, prehensive Plan Map Amendment dile tf:CPA-2019-0003 Parcel:4518 .02 13 It you have any euestionso pIY.-I :r` ,:'L: '}'rl I'' :11:11" [I:1 ,; ;lr; i Ilii . Best regards, V.7!p•.) :;•rlri"all l Ramer 1:7.7 '.i I.. :_i'.tta Ue I..ke�.venuf ( ' r�I','_.It' .1{.I,+j'�1k,�-'Ir 25 I Fnd li[' s�xlkCir'.-w'`Iii f7ii,y- �4• pwo this email and any attachments may Lie subi2cI t Ii::1,h . ; 1,:Ir'::.ant to!e.ashiragion State's Public Record Act,chapter 42.56 RCW. 2 TAB 5 , COMMUNITY & PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 4.4.°1414.4arrala BUILDING&PLANNING DIVISION , snrieF 100VallEY STAFF REPORT TO THE PLArietuvG COMMISSION CPA-2019-0009 ArIlleamm....MIW /1111, STAFF REPORT DATE: February 6, 2019 HEAR1NC DATE AND J..k_H. L„ F1ON: February 2S, 2018, beginning at 6:00 p.m_ Spokane Valley City Flail Council Chambers, 10210 k..-.4 Sprague Avenue, Spokane Valley, Washington 99206. . . Project i (1'A '.'0 1 c) I) 09 Number: __ . _...., ......... _ _ . . Application 1 Prc ..zil .. d ..-nige C linvi.-.11,..6-;.-,... 1'1;21. hilid imii. de:iignali.i-In and zoilin. ; (ID! ...-1 from Descri tion; 1 i\Ai.11!11;m11., k,=•!-i.1, 1-1, :LI (i'vIIII::. r.•1.'Li: i6i,i! Mixed 1.1, 611C1".411,;:i. Location: PJ.k..:. I iii i;i.H....r, .11, , 11.i..1.1...1150, (-I.: hill) ' 1. 15;1:',.!..1.1P12zi !!151.04.03-. :-. .15104.0-1! I, 47, 45 101 iTi DS, 41-5104.C!--.1-!.11, i'1'i i i.:11.011_1•1rLi9, 1,51111z11122., :I': 11..:!1.1137.7 e6 0.1 0328, adC i esse'ti as 1 7, 'Of::, ';5(ii, ..7'515, 13511) 111111110..-1 ,irid 1. i.iii:i'..i H ,. 1 ;i:71.1 Avemai, ioinled north of Nolisizi!iiii Avenue b(.!i,ii....,...!in the ink: \cciim:.: 1\i,H.A.•ri .,vventio azid McDonald Road and M:ssion Avi.:..,:;k' :Ind tylinnii.71,1,1-11- . 6 4 of Township 25, Rmg44, NY il ;II lune Coumi,..... Was1R7ir,[oli _ . ApplicAnt: Cii , 01.-f.:d,.,..10L: V:1.11...-,.. 102101..::-.1. ;-;py.:11.:..11...: :....„-..,..ilLic '..,:v,...::.:.•.,: '....,d1-. ..,.-_ We",, I)LE06 Owners: 1 p,cii:1ii.• iiii._! 13.0nr.ii• cli,;,), ni..! 1!..0, 716. qi....1iii111.!, V....A Hiii •-•,•.; ..._ i, 1:111-.4,11 I !!!!!;T: I IVIii,i;ii I A vi.iiiiii.•. c:!,,,L:ii.ic ‘,..,:il!...... ¼ / i.!...iii.'.16 ..lcirry 1!._ ,!!!-!: 1 ii:!! 1'i I i.. I'vli,:i.,;1(-6 '.o.'(...1:1 i:• 1-:1!),.1..,- Li: 'y'!,111i.:!'1. V.,'A c;.I.:::! _• \ :i;k::,,itclip.i,t...r.:1:: !.t...t.lc:sKt.al yd, LL15320 E. 1v1i sioa Ave n u i.. !-.:,?,11-,j,lie. %%I:L.', %VA. )92.6 11 T 0ill! Nit;.'.I I C . 'WA W'16 -tC, nu.::, .A...,..,illh5. Spkae i, :.-;(e., crh ..... . Ci`.•:nsolicla16( h ii, 11H...111)6m:1(1 NL . 10, 120 N. (_.,,,-.,11-.H.ies Road, Spokane Valley, \VA 09016 Iicruli_Tsoli 1.t.gick.iy, Ilk, 319 S I.-Ilor,..iiii.:71...tiv,.... [ 11-....1[•:: .,11,1c, %VA, ';110,..) 1 Whini!..-;ical Pig LTI) Pa1i11rii...1:ii-i, i!,-; 10 ! 11 . iiiiciIi,!ii..1-,, 1.4.0;0.1 :.- 1.,..:. .I.iIII0 Scottsale, AZ W(k!: of 1.)ctol.)er 31, 201S Aloplication: _ . . Staff C:oninct: V-,ii Li: KL:whill, l'InHilLiir, !1).! 1 F. Siii..dv..te A ._v..11.1.1,„•... -.11kliii._! y:111,..::,., WA 99206 APPRovA], CiMEIRIA: Spokane Valley Comprii.... 1.1,.:k..... PHIL. l'ilfc. i 7 :-.1!".iiii..:4•111..., VLIILiy 1\11.-inicipal Code (SV1v1 ) Gaueial Piovisions, Title 19 SVIVIC 7,)Liiii!, 1•:....-„,:.'HI:irit.r., . :Iiol 1 ilk.: 11 H\.\A( Hi% iliq riii2nial 11...'.onilrols. i . . ATTACHMENTS: • . . . . Exhibit 1: Vir,...initir. Map Exhibit 5: Environmental Determination Exhil)it 2 (,..:cmipruhensive Plan Map Exhibit 6: Notice of Public Hearing 1.:Allibii. .. : Lonirle WILiii Exhibit 7: Agency Comments Exhibn 4: SEPA Chezldist .._ ::::•[.il'..R.,Th•:)it CPA-2019-0009 A. H.M..-.K4:.;It.OUN1i INIA)It\lATION .1.1ic Cornprcliensive Plan 'Map .Lid Zoning Map arnenclinent is a City in II I::H:.I 10:::,.pasal.to cage kc Con!picIaz..nsive Plan Land tis t Designation ri:' ! ' pill..-._:1:,•. 1.1:,...111 ;::.".1.1:fanilly LI.,.....::01.:.:.:aLLI r1"::17:',.‘„: i.:_, Nil ixef.I I..t.3c(C1011j. During kt:c ,.I 1, t i...Lik. c11.• t..-,.,!1,17•:': IL.:r1'1';',.: VH. [ . :ads SIJIT,!.Mdillp, 11•447. k-trop_osicci ani.......nrbent arca NA4,_.14.! le rk:..,...,I211ano....1 : inl i...-.0T.I..:110 i'l ryif I 1 1:,..: ..>.i i ., InrEl. .... ...w..... r. ....To, I 1'.. .1 ,410. 111.". 1:-.:P.:1,17: W.: ..' dosi.e:10.0ci ryti,P. k!'i., ,,1 i.,... wii.., ,.. ...1.1;,-Iiifd 1.•.0,,.: 1.,,,,,,,.. ...•,. ....:d..,,,,,ILL:Hi 1.,..,:ii:......,.1 0-,.. ,..011:: .i. ..:,[1.:hi:!:...Li lh,,i, this area al.pinj i•N/J:-...:::i.:ir, ..\.:,..t.tit.2. :464:i:lc I,: All. y.,.‘,1 ! ! Litlyolt•-1: r..(.4ir“t44 IC, .....'iill •1-:c 11,1;.: ic:rt::. .tr'.I.,-. Corridor:',,iiKed 1.1:-..a- tic.-4.;,Hon. Since the City's ine...;poraliaii in fVfard, 21:107i ni.: 12 pareck11:-..wk: be.i.:n ilesi.,..plianci ::nnl -,...co:: C1 int.nii- fainily. Two artrf n1.lit colopixxes and r. JILI' :1!'1?h. 'tittily rosidinicc::.: Lre ict:-AL‘_•....(1 among: iii 1 parc.c,:.k The Whimsical Pig 4'..•••J-: :2.nii:-. 1u....lorl ii I.:.:'..'(.. ,:', H Fun i\1 :,irlI1lo.:41t.s ct.-•niruc-ial in 1978. :...vc.. rt,J..-..idem.-J: s in 1941 and the last i.,vo resikl.Lrace,..: v.t::::e: ; ,11...11 JL,.,.:(i 'nil,9'I and 1 ),18. PROri.t•;11 )1 li,J.4..kmAirioN: Size and Chai...1.-ieris1.......: iii.c ;.1,..p._,..iiy cr.-.7mr'..-, ..ii • .' :.;-..:T.cls tot,Iiii?r1:-.•:.7•1 Acr...: i..t c:......4.. !.r,...11,1 • on Hi:-..-Hit -,..,..4,1t1.._ 14.) di,. 4;IF., :41....; i',./;:ilift: te.:0:11.'i t '.. ; ::risr. — — , , , Comprehensive 1-11.1;.: r••..1.1 !•;:[,;;!•••,•• K•,:•;ih.Liiii:,' -- _ --- Zoning: 1 NitiltiLicii:- k..:•:Hci:,i1.!il if.,-.1.',.'„.) Existing Land Use: l ,,,,i7 in LH...1w',.-. •,11..1110,11i ....c•Eir•!,..\-...- J.:14: i..41.1',. ...!,t4,SURROUNDING CONIPPLii ENs[vE P6,34.N,ZONiNG,...4,‘4:1) C 0 I n Pi f.::1 1:.1 c..i ve Pkri-i: (.;,-.-Ari.lot :•4.4liv...t! ; :.::.. 0 .M1.:•) Nuitit Yota:It.... (.. :4•4kfidor M ixoti I._kc: Lisk....: l\ ii 41...Alta, oti icc. slriPL- I' ',Ii'.1)' li:!..;ItL:r!,',.`-:, ...-;',...',Ii!ti I.:C.1.1. r. 1.,111.1:..1:10... ':.4.1 _ . COM7,,:i. H.:11:•;!'-,,,, '- 1.. .,..ri.idor NI L.,..c,I 1 H.:,:,i .1,.111 ... ':,.,:ludifinr: .:,,.: !..:',.:-.sr.d...r.iliil (MIR) and Single !...n.:11iI.:‘,., 1.......:::. I.1,•;:di,:l C.::::.f:I<) South r/.....: ;II:. I.',..1. idL:d• [..:h..4:4:d Use(CrviU),Multifamily ResidenLiin (.\•11.k .1 .i '-•'H.,:.,ic.• L i.inily r1_ .:4IH 1.11•1••;.ir, I i.;4-...; 1\1•.,:.1.1i11: II Li.:111pleX,nickl.H:::11 offices, ... gle-farn-il:•.• -._., d: p.•:.,...:, di...Li ,,,::,_:111. r•iiki V..E.,1,. ._-..',.,..: :-...2 i'li.,Ji. 1.;.!,:-.:11otk,t-11 C'.0k:tr-.1:2.1-cia J:4;.(7) ;1,1 ..4..11:ti_: 1:-JH 1%: 1,..c..:.;0.•:.Th ti i'.--'41-13..) 1 Ea3lt ./...)..ting• kc.,:tiontt.lCorkinicrcial (KC), Sii112,1c 1:;:t7Illiv k:J;(1,11:1j ; WAIL ,....;:„: 4(illice...:,....,illir41.,e,Ne-•;.-:. shi.,..!le-,;L111l1)." R'SKICIIL111V L'..`-_- ..". ,:l LIL1.1[11. i'd.hd - - C:inillIACIi.-:rtiv. r",)IP.11: E.. .:21Tilk1? "N•li"..._•4'.,:_i Use(CMU) West :.........ri-..F.- (..:01-1-hl..-)r M1o.1 (..i!,•:-... (CiV11,_) Uses: Assisted living taeiliiv, h •erbaric chamber,medical and dental offices • Smil It CPA-71119-0009 I NIP ILlir_A Ill ONS: Ti-m le7.011C of the site to CMU wcv.ild ..7111iwi il broai!L. 'I aup.: L::11.-i,'..,.; Ih.F1 the Mrl< zone. S'inec. the yaKcIs ,iii• e :rt.111;.:„: . ,2,...... 1,....•ped with n .-..,:ingli;-:::11.i,y i.,i. :ill :',..h..711i.y hs1.!....- .111:,. ,:111nge in 1..losi,411, lui: r,C1 ilic pili'CC1 w1 ..1:(1 !lavc r:IIII-LaU,..111..; riAr Iii klpiihill ilirl.(21.. ,..,. !II,. 16.1,....i..;„2, will mol ciectu tinies;,,, 1 le ciii.F.1;1 r,...,i U.:110A ils,.is trausiticn lo :,. :,.....-wrik:i....1.!J i!se lifiCiej Ll'iC CM 1.1 ,..u.ning designation. •11:71 .1.,it:. .,, ,,i-0.7.' F... ini1.:m:1nd irOI LL :s sin.11 - I ri..1 .iiiiiiii15.-ilinn, re,uli , multifamily, siv1c Iiiinih...: and 111y.i.., inarrtiNiispori -iioil c.-.....:11,1,:r-i. The ...,si-iiii.„. !..:1111 use.s iiie .:i110,....,..,,L.C., Thc (NO clesn/rEilion .10.:.iic.., :he exi..,J'.n. .! 1.1!•;CS. 111:• Cl:. WOLliti pi.,... leo iiim.....; 1,2,,,il.li I ity Ir, itiL.re,r,Hy, tIi c iln-isity r...driir.. ,iiinen.4.}nall rcguironents. I :L-re al L' !,o IMEIS hind] ])1._!ivilr111(lardS or sCrec'Lin t,:ill.w..! ',.b,111. , .;... !,..r I.° ,....iiv..s. The subicet parcels nr,- ,idi:ii,.-......1,1 i.c..1 Mission Avenue and desigulcd il. an I. -1...:11 n::,iel-11.1,..:Hil IN,1!:...,,: 01: AVCI WC •“_61.','L . :!..; a bilfici to loss -1:11.011,1' uses located k.-,1111-1. ..\, ., currewl., . oi ,....I :L. ,... ,.. ;,,..1c.H.,U;i, 11. iii.' l)..1,. n 17-ililliri,,mil.:.,. 1.1.S.:2!, "..0 Siq,10-1.0111iFy 1.!!',..,::-; 1)CT L-VNfil( : :l.' 1 :II , .,'''' '',) '.),'ii ' h.,: :II: 11.1 iiimI ..A.q.illid ; 11,1....: 11mre crevelooniciii LexibilityICU (IiI;C Ai:.,,, "..:1-1t I)Lik:,'1. /H ], .1 ', .N.11 . .i:- `,.•.':11 : ; 11.'''.If. 1.i l:',' 1 :I 1.1.-.. 1.. ..:•1::1"1 IL 11 pi.-tru-15 within die sullje......-t af CL. .1 IE.; CJMU €H.:;-4ii.-.L.1011 :A.. hi !c:i.,'....1.1 ,;:.1-,k11Sliy I!.'.,11',C1.1.011. Iii COil1pflilS011 thl' .:2111':-..7tli MFR zone is limed to 50 feet in height and 22 dw,..,.l1H.ig units per aci us. The followirig table provides a comparison of the development requirements for both.zones. R-3 & CMU Development Standard Comparison , Lot lvfaxirruisis 1.11 Minimum Setbacks —% Density BuikEng Zone Covcra.i..,e I:ront Ylird Garage Side Yard Rear Yard Height ;\•.:I:R 0 ft. 6 O'76 ' i 5 fi. 2tl it. 7, -...1 l 0 It 22 duilaere CMI: N/A N/A N/A L —N.f.A , N/A N/A No density limit* ._ — 1 'S,I.'15.F...''''f'' ir,•`,1112'1,),' rte' /_51fr.(11.11 Ceiiilply 1..4,fi, ,'ilt,.cric.013'1!....'r".•.r :1 I leVel....,,pmein Niondards ofi/.&MFR Zoe. A..PPLicAriorcPROCESSIN(;; Chaplet 17.8(.: Pcriiii[ Priicts!:liii,, ProcA tires in the SVMC. The.foiliming summarizes key app I 11.ion p]ocochirS fcr the pi ipr:isn:. Pro,A po I icat'km Mcctiq,: _ 1-- _ Cicrober IP: 7,r1 1 7 . :opliC:il.L'ii ."-.i. bilElled! 01:101)1.77 31::. :I:d 7 - '..-;11):',, I K.I.ci ii:Iii.r.ion i-SNon-Sieni.Picince Isstic date Fchrtrai., End ,..d ALF,pci.t1 Pei:in:11cl-DNS: Not .A.ppe,nle.ni rd Null it •",-..',l,',_ LDalt.: or l'osio:71 Not icc o 1.Public E teat iri , l'i..Thruar, _ 1:),..ite. of Publidiec.: Ni.lice of Public I {caring: Fd)ruar,. 7...2018 i 1 Dcite ol-MEiled NIcitico of Public I-Liiring: Pc.111-uary 7,2018 13,_ FINDiNGS /i,N1) CON(i:Lsi()Ns srEciffh: 1() SETA 1.. Findings: Pursuant to Title 21 (Environmental Controls) SVMC, ::lie loij ,- agf.'[Wy has l'IvdCrillitied that this proposal does not have a pi-7.1nablc :;ignificant ritivt_ns.L.. imp:[ 011 OK. .c,livironinciit. An Environmental Impact StatemErit r.,.IS) is not rocHirt.'d under R.CW -..13.21C.030(2)(c). The Pnow, 1 AF 0 cPA-2019-0o09 Staff Report Building and Planning Division issued a Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) for the proposal on January 25, 2019. The determination was made after review of a completed environmental checklist, the application,Titles 19, 21, and 22 SVMC, a:site assessment, public and agency comments,and other information on file with the lead agency. 2. Conclusion(s); The procedural requirements of the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) and Title 21 SVMC have been fulfilled. C. `ll l lNC,iS ANTI, f tJh.d() 's siq:C1IT1d_Ii Ill rrv9141ZE)1FNSIYE Pr AN ; II]t;s;11L�1I' i \ :i.} 1:i^7.()fE I. C;urllp 1unce',+ith Title 17 (General Provisions) (dike Sl:'ok.1'i 1`..tfr 1191?.ili `E:L at 0i1C ;t. t{iRdingS: SAY (J!.l Gl ': '. lii1LreILc r!':IVO Phn Arne11dnient and 1,.'} 151^. La �l nmy . 4.'ilr.".ti' > ':I'I'I^,i :'!i: l k all :;L1ll,ItdliI( li Lil!_I wen-wide zone map ai71CudincIILs LI it �tilllti L11;« (I) The proposed amendment bean. sl:l:>r,l .;; I. 'L I.', Ilip to th "^I.LI!lie health,safety, welfare,end protection of the env .r if 1 L: A1idySIS.' The arrwnri ii.?tU pY?! 'rp•.'. inorc d uses. The tL rl .rr J 1 an $rdr`d'."i�J�l7;?f" � wNl!! CIJ" Mfr rr oppod it n,.!.y to ac.L`:css daily good., ., 7 Theproposed 1,t (I 3 " 1. JR rf r'"ri i �!f S'I i it4 r r !,}r in L!fr171.'/r.'r'ifi+ ri'�0 , UFO a .rr 'ira�.i, 'd- er r.r7r . ��r r c + �.;,'- P.L'( Trt,S'ena rr; ""` `:1;'rfl�fQYi :5! + - r J ri' �' }r r1 Cl fii r.rir:' 14.! (if rhe CJ'i.'`i Pr) (he west, Ilorin andAC.!irJiP Ie 1Vrtl:"iii (fir ,Ti:r''.rL( "NITWIT-in;f71��"fll�TT-ir.':i of ,�j!o1canii (.aunty The ,r"d .'t:�tJrrrr t( .rJ'�Clr 1S �0� wit! Vera W.L.-, ,'r ou.!1 �'r 4t^�'d'. i.Jrl r r1dl�lJrt .S:ft it (1. C'it t 1r'r(`Lta". ,r d r .., , r .1 r?i'!rC{+[:r �,. f{d tr)( I.1't. uti ly j]ri.!{id'r.c ,"fr LL t'r'�td}PdC' rrr�r, ;�"xJ r,s . >Fr. ,'1:; x , cCPiti:1r•rrda!LCe with ar r iicahie C'i1j s1I7rrdrir;;1S and reeptitditt(?)L!?,}, Spt7+4 r'r '{.r}Jr'2 j' f'!P e' 1.1 sir'ri.r No. is r ?: re r�!Pufe'frl fd service provider ider fod' th?CI r police 1' / Pa.C,r the • > 4 r. .4 7r ri` tti r!citaiIff.e•:;'i ad r(i r. -i :" d:.;,r , Yf, . as .� .,"�rr:C'eS'S' Lw C:;'i,'u, .rr' d l'l;7Yr to .7idllr'Jr"i'i""!i'P'([if .�£I;�Ea(L'1C-'iCrIC1r ftid rj Yfd '' '1 "' 'r , i': . a1Lc'd`Pdb). L'i rrrdf'i i,rfCa' D! f!",ci�i e The dTrJ2CPyrr'r.1rc�r,f area is r!<Y1 G _} r A rti°lr12'iii:i; ra�''1`Yrr�7t, so,fety, 1r e/. iro tr1'r{< lr1I" - ..r r,.!r ilr r:i:t t'e�lr r'f�r J7"7c rli r r r r f wwtelR R7�' ':Lr(he state.'and the r'L,t; J`{?�siti�;.lrrL)Yi,• ( ) The prop ;cd.IL!v.i1711 ....'lli L1 : ns9Slent I.Cquircirienis1ii i I' 'FC 'ti• 'r��:: ryr l°.' and \.Lt11 Lin! l', - I-I'.L ril'u Cil}•'. lrior',l!.'ll Om no', ;I1IcrI.ci l: ' the aIf4,,1j,11.'.L'Lli,y r'lrroly,41.1'" ,Y�;t• .1110Li'.'�r rt�lydi'c:�;`{-a?r(?J7t .4.^t (G111.4) c doptS t irt'en goats 0 guide the pl-'Sr '�":d1 i,2r iii rtiT 1"l:f:t.r l'Limp/,'i':f rf' i}'t^ r±"`lri,ti .?tui .rci...vi0p13ir'iT. i ec!"7 gUrans. The re{jues ry ,. , , r growthC L?: r.r t'rilr.sf":'ect C,,'C`.'[;r llllli i'rC1t:. iL[?.' ' pwrfic i tdtlres. iff,r,."ll.'.5' . �,of'fxrziiy-J�Jr' Staff Report creates ff k,',1 C'17 p rii. ii.' thn I Irk dr.-I?•jg and i,Lifice 1;1,1_4 E.T.'4,,c' hi.,ne.2-0 is nui •fliy .• T1 nY r) h e plan. (3) The proposvd I I lie Property owner s conlrol aP1.dil-11, i 1 arc ....NthicE I the su1jc,..1 propcir, A ItalYsis: ho. ,1"u!.iiYinient 3-ubstantial chaiç hicocrtillory riN,. (i)C 20/6 (.::-.)ny.,rel-de#7.,:ive he 'dirt)WO; j/ .hf..14Y.S. • ire Co; /-/an 1;parC.,; d .20 the: tie ?i,.1Efl:I 1,-f,JaSi",JT,,,? •.:th ,f170 /and n'S(-!.ciid '1,•• is 7'h0 [))'0/F l('A; h (o?ri r;1,, ••I card r-rst. yquir.-3i0r) C'..1.1U. The foiid rie.iignedir;,1 cud parcoh- r i11ir.91:!Y r ge from iig171 req...'• (frifie:Or Mid iii(Uni j fi, I Iizes iC4.Vf'!..1(%4 iVith ; 0,1 /14-: '1 .1 (eijOr.7 t he A--irmsicn A ;":•:;;; ;; pai-cris orc 1.,,e cmu ph'?subs,..; funwe development. (4) The ; 1.rni.:: ing error; or • mapping erdi.n. arm inniid not any 0) rile iI 1601:1ficd dohcii.:1:cy in till.; 11 Ii Analysis: The amendment does Rol address an identWed deficiency in the Conivehar7SitV Pian. ii. The City must also consider the following factors prior to approving Comprehensive Plan amendments: (1) The physicAl Llivftcrriwnt; fij (7,1,I!: USrs ns well ai corn jnerrirti ...!" i +pc: ono' .+1;.1 1111.-1 vir;y. fr ;''e j'S Cithe:'; .Oct Q./physical,i,:iv....coppoW. (2) The effect on open and .4/hdrsis: There are in.f2/WOiin crnicae area).f.r.'sZ!'012 .1" with Ehef and areris.. f epe,,illy liooeitfci was or e US. /7C,' at-W 'Of MoreiineI nir.ithrtjcu (1..0 fluE., ,,f ore ie S1'.?'',0 :C WW1 WO or ch'.+(bWit).' !SSire.S. orcimapc•c, eaStei!' (.,+-r•;•ifectir7if 111 the ,ffects and ad./at:en( 1c/Id Odd ni Staff Report CPA-2019-0009 (3) The compatibility with and impact on : Lip..-o-; ( nd uses and s1.Hounding neighborhoods; Analysis: The CA/7 .V VII (+: north au/ west. 7Ji ! d .( ,e.L.re ?di.1( and tIi e :cwi +17:!? - 4-old dev8lopinClli cka„i; thttlire c i JrjF .5'd• i l• •..1 A'I'Lh..%!e) .ivititthq. The 18 ;!_.3 ocre area is limited to firtftre tivi,e191n;]ornO tiso 15.85 acres i5 eltrrendy ,`:!;on.u.... of ;lir 1..iily L ....'n,:ginbered by the /TA.) The ro2nrzeiniN 2.88 acres is vacanii.OF- !Nay ,!10i; [ .i'I'. Deveiopinc2ti be eva1uf2ted for cor,,1icr a 11 i fri7,1wis ii relates to cgiiiK:ch'i' mes. (4) The adeey cif and :Impact. °it commllnity facilities including utilities, roads, puhlEc frAnsportation. ,ic!icok; ji,filysis: 7 ri?Evigks. will Aerie • •h..• .r The nit-Ority rho!-YriA (121.vi'opez1ntif.1 adequate, At ehey ( flw-otaitoble•for fopifori P1/2/0 hitin'2. tir.F,.•t,lopment. ..411LL,Yi ? A dE-Y.•i.2.Pi.:tee: •? !Ji : AlWo).” . (AO Transit Awl:m-4) Yti irtto_]).-11c-.. .:.°_11170thood eon r ' ?r i The CilY'S Senior !f prepttr2t-c:) tc,,r.,o.oterniuR- thto number of ari1fjr.rip3 thai rielli:loporc (!1.6'.,V,Y; tkE.7' C 2012C. The T6,. 11 1'J prok,k-lecl ii) PioniFititc!. !lac!U7 Si 41.1111trisdidion for review and rF tia reipllborhood, City,and i-e6ort; Anotriifv: oroR..,1(ap,ct f.' sip,Fciii.!Fn provides equal developuTthe opportimily tO dit! ^ • Ili ht.!' COT rr.:(.1r ichvf h CWCOUP3t.r..V.V t she rr bed suci Nal t/,‘: defiCr Tag owing 1.:011.;;,q!..r ,,c..?" Of regtfk?fiWPilin'ye601,"C orl teimtg fl:C5 :n16 ri?.? .:cg creflYSa sitztoik..0 '.°E' .the. COMVer.1 /0-G5 1-4 tO yry'vc, lyiu! TdSe.s, r maI r r vor.,0Wite 1'0 it.r.r:( ; Will,' NW beticiit r/r Lu i . iiiig elLdir46. iad within u2'bi-2nipzed (6) The quantity and location of land planned for the proposd lIlcI use type and density and the demand for such land; Analysis: As . twin it Figure 218, _Residential Land Celipacity: of the Comprehensive ,,t)73 no deve op:thin! ficrcAik, Pk! IH., the MFR zone. POrfld vi,Tease lands NV 11 20"7 (114.1?-1? d.:lotely 18 ck:acs and dc Pon zone c,..J.inparabiy_ (oncr,...121en( p.y-),7sisterii with the to fi)&ctis2nixc.:1,v,se:rine"; CPS ryir ifennify develoi2,1 ut s (.} 7A 90, ehu arneFid.,ppnif area ....ppipeadta6'nt 11m in.`srgiowf iinp:L.1. bill thc change world QUI:TIT for inure iidernive uses Uati ac (7) The current and projected populeon density in the area; and SitI Ncpc,4t CPA-N19-000;J Am/fp:Ls: P.-C.i.f.', ,1/V ,ori-d Ton gporin.., lt O701.:11%1 of a . cie.n.u,ry p.:7Lopic the , 1Fe .11L0 ri: I se decr- e-)..se h'.117 I. 6-4:imity CteCoa,.++,+! noicei iha (iii.72.1Jona? L OI .1]L1-0 the cLirr,!: : should L.-1:i' j?...vprixtoli o'cllsio, 1i ff' ct upon üil Ias—)L'ClSri the CUIript ehensive Platt. -11"11is7 1.:40 ('H(/designalion will support mow of the Economic Lie-.,4,1!iio.irt,L7.q.t, E )r(riSPO)riE.01,-E-7)+-a. P A r,ie/FP re!?...,,fIn2e. C.,V?i ServiCeS, Plivegc• oirra Opcn Srxe and ..-1C1?;1:) (S Of the C(iNT.P, plou Conclusion(s): For the reasons outiErred above ihe 0: :1 ' ConSiQcne!,.. J hc ronlpi-J4.ensive Plan .t:...r,..;:itlinent is consi '1:111 dovelopmeni or Ic copuirn I vaC.Mit and ru.1.....kru(il'icci properties, : 1..:- LI : IR+ rIC iL ii i.Jiistrpal tics. I, I A ITN Car a riload range of housing, oppoi H:111 r 11.c Cr-P2 Optiiniz.c thc use blexisting public lacJitics before irtlicsin ,, H, Ai( kli'..1i171.,- COnCIUS/0111(g): The proposed amendment y cons.istoni with the City's Won. 3. Ad crinate Fluidic Facilities a. Findings: Thc! Growl! Act (GiviA) arid the City's Comprehensive Nan requires that public inkl services be adequate to 3c:rye. the developinent at the vi il ,lIc. ['or Thea ra s currcrntly served with Vcrn Water and Powor, SuokoriL Servr.c.c.s, VL]leyy. •.lol disrricr ijuil proiLoiionI.iri sorvir4.s al ; • wctin7, 11 !!.(2 die "larEirivid . ccr+r1IGII1 ;11 Ilk: link: dcyclopmcin is proi.ow.:I lor PN 13-PI rtr Staff Report CPA-2019-0009 I), Conclusion(s): A,-.1e,pt,::.v.:,.. iciki.',,h•..:-4.., .!ic vs cid.'.i'E.')/i/j,exist to acconThlodatz existing and future development Iv ylN DINGS AND (J)1\(1.11:S1()IN'S Sig-C(1 I,IC.: 'EU PliBLIC COIVINCENTS Finlnt2s Staff has rucivcd :1u pul).ic aniiiiiciii ,1,-)dNe. Co:Tiinitis reeei-ved followinthe date of this report wit! be p--ovidi-..:I _1.) iii1Lirriii4!,(.•olii mission at the Fc5ruary 28, ,ZO,C. riouLing, 2. Conclusion(s): N:-.-ili-..-_-e.cfPublic l!eurinp-(NOPII)will be published on Fob ruary 8, and FebriLT, '.-:.... -..,.1 1 ..:itk- iii:(I Iiili!ed eqi or 1)cfore l'oL-Erti.L-,, 13, 21)19 tO rc!;ic._...H.; v..-1:1!vi art Pur:-;:iiii: 1. :.-1,....:•_i:i..?1, I .1 ,:; ;.)..1 .13,1,c tip: Ch.) 0,....-1-rr ined it ,:vas appro,-.4Nu..... to Ili,-......:,,i,-. ilk.: 1--,..klitL, ;hit., -1C(I ;,;._.,-1. Lo .12,1Y.) ro:i .:1_10 EC3 II!!:' 1.i,..k °.,: F: .1.r,.: io.:.:-11_ in thc posed al0..:Iicirrient. E. FINDINGS. AND coNcr IN-IONS SPECIFIC TO AGENCY COMMENTS 1. F,iti,:liu:.4.,:,... i.....4. :., 1 1-i!ceirod oii•i, irc:e..7*,commenr:i of.....,ignificra;!,:v to dale. Agency Reccivtql cotnolcuts Dated Com men is I.P.II.::!tl.... \:HI1,...I. ::',.: I. 1: I •.; I-Lt. 111 US January lg,2018 a ,;!: .....1! Valicy i) vuiconicrit Ycs _January '..),2019 _, c•j,,.,:: !--.;p014anc:vallov,F,Jild.14...-r,&. Pitirming, cii,,, ,=, sp,:.1.yi , V.011,:y l'ark:,, it`.., 1ic--t-IC.00 'I....1:k%. l'ii..! ft.;,,-01,11;‘,111 Yes JanuarL9, 20 L9 f.' i. -I Millv,,....,1 .__ . (-..i.,. •',...11..iher_b., I..-,11:,,,- (".1.o.. ...,1-SpoJ.nric _ ...., t ..r],.. 4,zipok;_uie Valley Police 1-)4,.:pit:merit _ .,.1.,,i...: 0,,.( oiln1y, NI litlio, acid Pyirining Spi..l.Jtic Comity. 1 [ vIronit1c:L121 S.c.c.vicc,,:i Yes January 18,2019 sprit:Ckloni.v. Clean Air Agency J .._ ..— LIFLokaiie Coc,ii-v-.. 1:ire District'No. L Spokane-t.";))ilitty., 1--re 1)Istriet tJ1 S S okmte Couniv P.,,A.1!,ic.ii,11 1-IcalLli Dis'xic,11 — __ _ , ... SpLiv.: Ri,•;:r6,11.:11 Cic-.-4:,n .c.,ir Apv _____ . ...1:11.1fcr.1:Jill L Voaril 1 SpekTic 11111 LI Pan.liority (SI"A) _ ..._...._ "Vv'n,1)11.-on.;1 S'i-iiy; !)cpi. c..,r 1_i Ii) (0I\ . . . . . W.:1,4E,o(oriSiii.c. Dcrc cid 1„;:l.0:i.-)pL(Sr-duo-J'.2)_ „ ..._ '0.. ts11111P,Ioil !'Li'A- I)<1....q ,:.1LI.i.::1- &-. Wildllte ........ .7 WaswiiilLon i Sk-,ic 13 :1)1 o: Nnural 1eser -ces _ . , — \A;,-_,shin;zioil Stiitc..1.)e..-)44,-,1.111a13iinimticirl Yes January 16,-7-019 Staff Report CPr -2719-0009 li`ptil)inp,Lon State Parks& P.ecreition � �?n'llir:I5lC1t7 l !k ; r�.,i,;l acaltap,iwal I-IiStoric PLe. crva,tlon L'l kl0',`�t'.I IL' Ill 1i�1` Yes Januar 2019 vi 1:1 1..iLl11.11.' I11IaIrlc.1 Pow,- ] 1vlodcrn f i c .ti \\:;ncl room; 'riiI a` U >1u l I:isl l•'ul Ic.v School i we t l al1c� Sclii'n I„ink Con icus [Iri align ,oi18 t_".{Si solidat4G' IIri hilil I}IS:]lLt I . 1"..71S( 1)i triC:i Vc:}t \ ilLcr. r l'owwc~r NI),_sl;itri'• County k air4 <..r Di.S.int.1 ��- I, rlc>rn� ['ri15c ;,1'Indians 2. Conclusion(s): The TGL will be provided to the Panning Commission and agencies with jt,r•isdictton for i°eview and comment F. CONCLUSION: For the reasons set forth in SecAioil C (1 einci?)the proposed a,11c'ridilo.:nt in ci111ngc: 1Ii land ;re irksi..nntiori from MFR W CMU iti t :Ir: Is si' wit] the requirements'Qt t1i SV Mr 17.Sil,I40(H)and tli Coiuprehensive Plan, Paiae 9 of 9 EXHIBIT I Vicinity iVIa.p Lr k-ZU 1 a—UUU' - - — — 1 \RI:Iile3tu 1 i'7 - I -1 1-- !- � l'oirrll rrl, ' l Mari its A e ` f] - 3fi! "° -7iY frile)Parks- i [ rnit•r Geretenniul"1r•�!il' •7 l'iare• ' i E•lvinns held Ave 4--?"Spokane -----=--Di nd ian a{A ve, E Montgome Ave murien E190WI"'On E190Fwy ! }Q-fi 840 � 1g:' "��- E'Iynta-r vt -I� �'19D W2gfl ON f{anr ro a ,v RP' '1i�ittritti '4!,� .r..z'r�+vt{ v E f 90 L2Hp,pPJ!{aF q°rr. rry III E Maxwell Ave. g I .- E -late Ave 1_ ...v 4c r 4 Ei E Sharp Ave ca 2 ;H°- E Boone AveW z f,' EBonneLn E E Dcsme!Ave z a E c a Z :2 �u E3lrlier l!i�It ECataldoAve z z School and r-- z `- zlrMnllon Ct• Learning iing E Malltan Ave L North r6a'a Pines , .. E Broadway Ave .4r 1vIi+![lle - 4 . tt E E Springfield Ave "'l �' c rY ° C .lki Lvii 3 � r C "R"'IE Alki Ave z z J I I Z 'Miles 0 EXHIBIT 2 Comprehensive Plan Map r rt,a 1r1Sff .:wi � `am „ ''_ 3 cc E y �vY ..,a44.1,/,44A,:„ "1 b "0. c, ,w h ` ' 4. ^: p 0'. 1 * C �.S 1� tiw �� .... _ "*yy�-,�'''S: �1 'mow,, 1on, �.F ref. ',„";"7,4e i' „ ,� Y ..'..=.`"rte ,ii I 96 f �i�� 0 `k .E.'191)rn°y Ramp Non Al. 1 9Q ga OPF Rat Study Areanlp Th-- 1-'-- ��. li 1. 45114.9151 13107 E ffllI sIcJ AYkF { 40104.05 07TL `f 45104.0115 451Q4.0323( 1`71+ 4 1D4,gl5a 0 ADDIV8S I n VAc.ANT `UNKNOWNu i310T1'oaai2iy� LAND AVE i3nr 1afif 445104.0329a s' ,LWWrU H n AlidaRFss i. II 1501 4jii • . 117SSi0n fu4C —� "— 1153E "'I 15619 E 11sslorrrv¢1 /M183fOxrwe 136x11" MISSION AVE 5 I 6 utas"off r"w 1 G t? A - 1 rnl I I I ' ---b 1111 { C • I [ PA-2OI9-ftOU9 I est: ilt) l il, l Owner:Reit.And 3erela e,ril I l 6Iwan Amp,.leaf Kma,JflIn Mo ssen C iy initiated proposal to change Iced use ' 4000010 Valley C?cnsa7aa et!Mownrte,is_ designation.arra zoning from MFR to CMU Henderxrl L MY.LII- . VNrlmskal Pig LTU Pati A.11-7Ship EXHIBIT 3 Zoning Map a �- F1 -, ,'1 .'F t SA f C•� ., ";LI I_'T �.�1 1 tik 4 L - :} } 4 . �, +Alia ci r';:I -7,'"....I °a 4'7.24-4, +..x�?-'" k Y ai-. s 9� " �. �.y 4.1,,,.:7".:* � �� 11� � � C� t y+.,T� �,�v 1-.1." til� �y�. '""�' tl • �, „ J^r7 , cy .::'^''.,,,,":_1,71,•''):"7',"',;M a �, M 1.,; P 1,r 'lx M,"';..' as RA +� J 1+' r"`''x 4 ry,t "}i .,.,�.' 4 ti ""'$. ° e x ' u, ''ni A� wwE ..-c h4, t9�,� r i r„ -"_' �-i h ..,,y 4 �i, � E 195 E �� '1,1/.1-.0 Tv�;IIT1p, E as Ave l'9(1 ,gp4FF rr� . 1 I uc �y Areaj [ . - 13157 E /I L 1 MIS SION Mil-I 171 7 UADO HESS UNKNOWN 1 .., .# I — 45144.I1)aze 145104.0823 fl At3eYI0ESS 45104.9150 d V4CAN#1 t1NhSNbWN " 13147'E —� LANd 45104.6324 4.. -' ...tif' MISSION AVE 1aaa7Y u'11-. :."i=- +1st«.a>,uI '14$104.032S PILOOR�S uxCM7NN I '10 ADDRESS — LStCtAaa I' ,U KNOWN1tl £fd1A►E�,-.��mr li i51l,`I,g4 I l ,,, C Mission Avc Yr. -.. _ • �, uswa.o>>0194.031•FL, 46104.0311 45904.0330 ID416E • 415"MAV€I ------.—J 13619E - 1352. MISSION AVE G E ikl�c e I �, • I I1G l L, ziG u. II I' 1 zv E Sins Avc I , • 1 III - . CPA-2099-OOO9 Request: !7rtd\NI I Owner_SIJ® + Nla J ca sng.RuenandBcctMn,po n Cit)r iniriatedprop sa4 to change use II Valley o1em,s� Iieek ti Vcnl ad,lLC,$ .andgeerLr9e7..,-LC,rrhlp dsignct ton and zontngom MFR ro CMUJ w.. sPTDa' r t, p0 ar SEPA CHECKLIST �' a11eSVMCz.a 10210 E Sprague Avenue +0 Spokane Valley WA 99206 Phone: (509)720-5240 4 Fax: ON)720.5475 4 permircegreascokancrrallew.ere S FFU E N Date Subrnifed: 12-2U-18 _ Received by: Fee: A, PLUS #: File#: PA-2Up e R7 i -- EQ RED MATERIAL "THE APPLICATION WILL WIT RE ACCEPTED IF THE REWIRED MATERIALS ARE NOT PROVIDED`• [] Conplaied SEPA Checklist C] Application Fee [ Reduced Site Plan of proposal in BY" by 11" or 11" by 17"size 0 Trip Distribution and Generation Letter, if requested y .cvelo Foal; Engiula�,sritep. LJ P,L;QS nir• QI lE,CF IST; I he Sta::e Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), -ha,ter .13.2ii C f;C'.'"'r requires f .qAn all g v r,7m..nlr l �,c. ictes to [:onsider the environmental impacts of a proposal h:~fs,re makintl rl�r t r ns.An environmental imps.rs(statement _EIS) rnus: be prepared for all proposals with probable significorit ;idvrl s irrpocts on the: qui-:.,[114 of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide. informacion to ire. p you r_And the agency s from your proposal(arid to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be donr.,) and to help t`}}im+e ncy decide whether an EIS is required. inal$.UC1ION5 PQR APPIUCANTS,. This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic inform,:-.1.::-.n •i Soul. your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental irni,ar.1:. ai your proposal aro significant, requiring preparation of an E.15_ Answer the questions briefly, with the r ios7 precise information known,or give the best description you can, You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your kriowi dge. In most c_scs you should be able to ana':'s r the riur;stions From yor,r own abservetionb or project plans withciut the ,need to hire experts, If you really 1,:o rrt t l,:.clo + tire answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal. write"do not know' or"does not apply C:ii plete: answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary-7ryr delays t,;te•`. Scj it rrrestion • rl wl n:lrriri rl,iv. rrin7errtal ro ulations. such as Zoning, shoreline, and landmark designaat',ons. these c l "� If you r. .rI. if you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you_ The r:hr:f,:k.ist questiar,c., e,pr,,ly to rill parts of your proposal, ever- if •,,r±:u plan to do them over a period of time or on diltc—ent parcels c8 I rl l f•.r ; tnuy addle; :nr7l iriforrla-.:r1:�n ilr<:r rill help describe: your proposal or its enviroT'Inn"1t::il effect 1 i r�i r cc. v I r:h `.rr 'r ':'„ll mit t.11l f 1y4 [.I;I i may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional rr�i. r Ilr,n r:. ;a nobly rcli-ito.l to ri�:t.: r it II'u r ;.bore may be significant adverse Impact. Complete this checklist for non-projQct proposals •!nciugrn eut ;:ions may be answered"does not apply,' IN ADDITION, complete :he :;!JPP!_ELISNTAL SHEET POP,,N(!-'- ACTIONS(Part D). PL-2? V1.0 Paget of Spok❑IS l9 acne SEI'A CHECKLIST Ear non-project actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site"should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1• Name of proposed project, if applicable City-initiated Comprehensive Plan Amendments (CPA) 2. Name of applicant: City of Spokane Valley 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: fcaren Kendall, Planner, City of Spokane Valley Community & Public Works Department; 10210 East Sprague Avenue; Spokane Valley, WA 99206 4, Date checklist prepared: December 20, ME 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Spokane Valley 6_ Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Anticipated adoption in May/June of 2012. 7. leo you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? No. if yes, explain. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will bo prepared, directly related to this proposal. An Environmental JrnpactStat neral(EIS)was completed for the City's most recent Comprehensive Pfau update, titled 2017-2037 Comprehensive Plan Final Environmental Impact Statement(FOS)and supporting g Development Regulations. 9_ Do you know whether applications are pending far governmental nppruials of other propDsals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? Mo. if yes, explain• 10. List any government approvals or permits that MI be needed for your proposal, if known, City of Spokane Valley Council approval. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed .uses and the size of the project and site.There are several questions later in this checkiist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this parte, (Lead aericies may modify this form to include additional specific information an project description ) Proposal to change Comprehensive Plan land use designation anc' III) 1 ,.1r;c; Multifamily Residential(MIR}to Corridor Mixed Use (CMU • 12, Location of the proposal, Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, incloIng a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known, If a proposal would oc:, it over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal ddescrrpucn site plan, vicinity map, and topographic neap, if reasonably available. While you shop'd alar ii ::nv plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted witr, any permit applications related to this checklist. PL-22 V1,o Page 2 of Spokane SEPA C1-3ECKUST 4000 ValleY Parcel numbers 45104.9150, 45104.9151, 45104.0324, 45104,O315, 45104.0311, 45104.0307, 45104.0308, 45104.0330, 45104.0329, 45104.0323, 45104.0327 and, 45104.0328, addressed as 13303, 13507, 13515, 13519, 13607 and 13621 East Mission Avenue, located north of Mission Avenue between the intersections of Mission Avenue and McDonald Road and Mission Avenue and Manlier Road, further located in Section 4 of Township 25, Range 44, W ttamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washington proposed action lie within the Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA)? Yes. The general ;n.,..1ac:r. Se-y,;c.=,,, Area? Yes. priority Sewer Service Area? Yes. (See: Spokane County's .ASA {_)v orinif &lir Atlas for boundaries). i.. .l lac: tollowinciestnt Part.A. a. Critical Aquifer Recharge Area(CAI A)f Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA)_ 1. ❑e;crib(: any syst rras. other than those designed for the disposal of sanitary ',,wase, installed for the purpose of discharging fluids e eiooA, the ground surface (includes systems wtacla s ihose for the disposal of Stormwater ordrainage from floor drains)_ Describe He type of system, the amount of material to be disposed of through the system and the types of material likely to he disposed of (including materials which may enter the system inadvertently through spills or as a result of fircficghiing activitiesf. Not ap iitiFible. 2. Will any ohomioars < , :.r:�_:is it ; ti �;.�..nic solvents or petroleum fuels) be stored in aboveground or _,r cic ;-arsmli1c ;stca,r ri; t.a:iks? If So, what types and quantities of mater . l Not. 3. What protective rhea ures will be taken to insure that leaks or spills of any chemicals r;tored Or Lied on site will not be allowed to percoiato to graundvvate:? :iu includes measures to keep chemicals out of disposal sy tc mo s ': clii:� 9i1 . 4. Will any chemicals be stored, handled or used on the site in a location where a spill or leak will drain to surface or groundu iter or to U Stormwater disposal system discharging to surface or groundwater? Nut applicahie. b. Stormwater 1. What are the depths on the site togrouru;l}A, tc:r 2nd to bedrock (if known)? Nut pt:);'_able. 2. Will stortn-o iter be discharged into the grou d? If so, descriee any potential impacts after project construction (for example, asphalt or kali>dings)? Not app.ticE-ble. • PL-22 V1.4 aaE 3 of r-41El CZ LI p( � ' til PA CIMCK K P 15"1 - Valle , B, ENI/IRONMENTALELE ENTS 1 ) Earth i=?1e7LUAT10N FOR AGEP!cY USE ONLY a. General description of the site(check ane):❑ flat,❑ rolling, a illy,, steep slopes, 7 mountainous, other The parcels range from flat to steep slopes. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? Unknown. c. What general types of soils Lire found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If yc:u know the c assification of agricultural soils, specify them and note Drime forrlil incl, Not appticabte. d. Are there surface indications or history: of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? Not applicable. If so, describe. :'::scri4e the purpose, type, and approximate quantifies of any filling or iyAilnq proposed. Also indicate source of fill. Not applicable_ i eras on occur as a rr.sult of clearing, construction, or Use? Not ,:pp: e;roi k_ li z-,o, generally describe. AL out what pc It +"'lt i.'ir sit lj`I!1 be r:4]',':rc :.. ;If!'l impervinUs surfaces after project cons.r.1r;:icon (for example, asplii I! cr b;.iiidirigs)? Not h. roar;cl�;oc r.:=°°a==L;rt.... to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the i.r r:aHT At,r,laeof future development, all c;ratting activities will the reviewed per the.C6ty of Spokane Valley's Street Standards (SUSS , 2) Ar a_ What type;; of emissions to the air would result from the proposal(Le, dust, automobile, odors, irtdustrial wood smoke)during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate cio aitities if known_ Not applicable. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? Not applicable. if so, generally describe. c. F'ropnscd r1le a.ares to reduce cr control emissions or other impacts to air, if any. Not applicable. PL-22 V1.0 Page 4 of SEPA CHECKLIST 4012035VaileY 3) Water a. Surface: EVALUATION FOR 1) Is there any surface water body or, i i e rrirnectate vicinity of the AGENCY USEDNLY site (including year-round arid SOiSUIEIl .5truatris, saltwater, lakeS, ponds, wetlands)? If 'es, tyre and provide names_ If appropriate, state wha:- cky into. Mot applicable.. 2) Wit! the protect require arty'work or, in: oi djaciuni tc, ( thit 2Ufi fe the described waters? If yes, pie,asie describe rind attach 3vailabPe plans. Jot applicable. tHscirnate the amount o cid dredge firialeral 1-lei:would he placed in or removed ‘rorri surftci wor or v.ietlani=1..5 and the area of the that would be ariecitcici. ridicate th Source of fit material. Not 4) proriosal require surface water v.,,ithdim6iRls or diversions? Faippficable. Givc oeriL-ral description, purpose, and approximate quantities if 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year ilhodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. Not applicable, 6) flne. hc rICIi0.;2:1 involve any discharges of waste materials to surface If so, describe the type of waste and LIrviicb--zitt.ci volume of Discharge. b. Ground: 1) Will ground water Lo .„-vithdrav,:n, or will ti7: ground water? Not apvik:F..brz. Givc -,J!!q1en-Ji pdtpOSC, or-c approximate 2) 1)c-scribe. that will citi:iharyo( into the ground from iic tanl<E, c),;:hc~ sources: V Lift; (for Domestic sewage; containing the following chemicals p_gricultural; etc.), tii . ciener;_:i I size of the System, the nui-nt.ii7:r of such systems, number of hous::::=s to be served (if applic.ible), Di- the number of Einimals or humans the sysirmi(s) are expected to serve. Not 2,7);phcbl.2. FL-22 V1.0 Page 5 of Lill ilk oI SETA CHECKLIST -A Wiley EVAL!JATICN FOR AGENCY USE ONLY c. Water runoff(including store water) 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flaw"? Not applicable. Will this water flow into other waters? Not applicable. If so, describe, 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters`? Not applicable. If so, generally describe- d. Proposed measures to reduce cr control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any' At the tim of-future development, all grading activities will be reviemed per the Oily of Spokane Valley's Street Standards(SUSS). 4) Plants a. Check or circ-lo found on the site: :11Icer, maple, aspen, other I lre:. fir, cedar, pine, other LI :=•ilrCl�):: [[ 1crcporcfr ir1 I--1 wet Sail pit:rits. c ,bail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants; v.;ater lily, eelgr;as other o other types of vegetation b What kind and F.mourt of vegetation will be removed or altered?Not c. List thre'ainned or errcl innnrecl -:pec:ies known to be an or near the site, Not pplic b n d rc:l.rcr, c rl l;•3ridscapinca, use of native plants, or other measures to presence or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Not 12pliea�te. PL-22 V1,0 Page 6 of Slietkane SEPA CHECKLIST ,u0.•# Valley. J irna s EVALUATION FOR AGENCY US a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on Dr near the site:birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: b. List any hreatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. No, c. Is the site part of a migration route? Net applicable. if so, explain_ d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: Not applicable. PL-22 V1.0 Page 7 of Lltk po� CEPA CHECKLIST 6). Energy and natural resources EVALUATioN FOR a What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be AGENCY USE OIVLY used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Not applicable, b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe_ Not applicable. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? Not applicable. List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Not applicable. 7) Environmental health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of tire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? Mot applicable. If so, describe 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required_ Not applicable. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: Not applicable. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your pr':.oci (for example; traffic, equipment, operation, other)? 2) Vdhat types and levels of noise would be created by or as73ociated with the projFct on a shod-term or a Ion -•term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation other)? Indicate v,,hEat hours noise would come rum the site. : of applictWe, 3j Proposed measures to -educe or control noise irnnects, if r,ny: Not applicab]e. PL22 Vt.O 'age B of 11411 �'f;lf_U:°•`iP_ o FC)R 8)_ Land and shoreline use F What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? . Three parcels are constructed with multi-family apartments and the remaining four parcels have single family residences. Five vacant parcels do not have direct access to a public or private street b. Has the site been used for agriculture? Unknown. 11 sc, describe_ C. Describe any structures an the site. Structure information below was retrieved from the Spokane County Assessor's Office parcel data on seven of t t parcels occupied by structures. 1. Parcels 45104.9150 and 45104.9151 have 11 apartment buildings and two clubhouse buildings constructed in 1997. 2, Parcel 45104.0324 has two apartment buildings and a carport constructed in 1970. 3. Parcel 45104.0315 has a residence constructed in 1948 and a detached garage constructed in 1989_ 4. Parcel 45104.0311 has a residence constructed in 1247 with two attached garages constructed in 94'V grid 2000. 5, Parcel 43104.0308 has a residence and a detached garage constructed in 1941. B. Parcel 45104.0330 has a residence constructed in 1E47 and an attached garage constructed in 1955_ d. Will any structures be demolished? WA If so, what? e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Multifamily Residential i/RFRJ f. Whst is the current comprehensive plan desgriatiari of the site? Multifamily Residential(MFRI P.,-22 Vi Page 9 pi Stilikane SEPA ValleY EVACLUATIHN FOR g. It applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation ofGi ucY USE ONLY the site? The proposal is not located within the shoreline designation. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive' area? No, If so, specify. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project's Not applicable. j. Approximately bow many people would the completed project displace? Not applicable. k. proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: Not applicable. I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: None. 9) Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Not applicabl . Indicate whether high, middle, or tow-income housing. b. Approx mately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high middle, or low-income housing. Not applicable, c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: Not .r:7. s'ifrci tjCs the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including Intr.' Anal:i; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? Not apa icabie. w,,?f-.at views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or r,bsti ucted? Not applicable. C. Prono:L; ci E r:o. 1.IrE`• fly rf IIIC a !:• ".?:rltrol '9':thetic impacts, it any: Not arp aticU bliE. • PL-22 Vi:.D P8ge10 of 14 SEPA CHECKLIST Valley 1 1). Lig ht and glare EVALUATION FOR a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce?What time of daysNCY use17O( would it mainly occur? Not applicable. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? Not appiicabte. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? Not applicable. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Not applicable. 12) Recreation a What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? There ere no designated or informal recreational opportunities in the immediate vicinity amendment. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? if no, describe. Not applicable. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be pro'lided by the project or applicant, if any; None 13). Historic and cultural preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed an, or proposed for, national, state, of local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? None lrRauwn. If so, generally describe. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeolo ica". scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or nc ,tt to the site_ s+t r,,z.; known. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: Not appitcable. 14x. Tr'a.nsportatio 2, identity public streets girl highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the :xis-ing street system. Show on site ph is ; any_ Site is to g_tcd ?.(lje!een l f iFs on Po.fewitu .ird is bor&c'".,C' 'tri li't, e.as[ FaRe11 of 14 ► '„3C) ia�"1 PA CHECKLIST '.fS axe. O. is site currently served by public transit? Yes. If not, what is the EVALUATION FOR approximate distance to the nearest tra7-,sit stop'? AGENCY 115E ONLY c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? Not applicable. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? Any affects to exie#i•n or future roadways wilt be assedecl at time of sate development. If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). a Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? Not applicable. if so, generally describe. f. Hew many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? Not applicabic If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any At the time of future development transportation will be reviewed per the City of Spokane Valley's Street Standards tSVSS). 15) Public services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? `Flee CPA is a non-project action. There are services}rr the vicinity and anticipated to be available attic,time of development. If so, generally describe. o. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. Not applicable, 16) Utilities a. Check utilities currently available at the site £41c: `si..it� , Vera'h'ks7ter sar,ci Power, natural gas, Arista, water, ot'erril V', Iter Corn pent/ and Vera Water. Powis, refuse service, telephone, Corncas , sanitary sewer, Spok:71-1.E.,, b. Describe the uri',iei _ that are proposed for Lhe project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which m ght be needed. Not spp]ic.hlc. PL-221f1.0 Page 12 of 14 n„ ] anSEPA CHECKLIST C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge_ I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. / Signature: -'k U, d Date Submitted: . ~, -� D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NON-PROJECT ACTIONS (Do not use this sheetforproject actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal,would affect the item at a greater intensity or ata faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise?It is anticipated as the sles develop impar will be mitigated through the City's regulations and outside entities with juiiselictiori. a. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: To be determined at time of development E Irr,.. . .}r.,lrl the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? It is not anticipated any tl.e\:i-:t•Jpment will affect vegetation or habitats of any kind. tea. Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are:Tobe determined at time of development. 2. 1-low would the proposal be likely to deplete: energy or eeteret resources? It is not inticippa°cd development of any kind would bo ikely to deplete energy or natural resources. l'r..p.. eee ince...1.r: to protect or conserve energy and natui resciurceSare To e rit�ra7rraed a:'; tir.ow.: of development. e. I ere would the prep:. el ft.. '•il_e_e to use or affect environmentally S n otic: areas or it rE!as ceegrlated (:`Fr E;.ic_3ihlc or under eiud,,e for governmrtientat protectiee such as parks, wildieelese wild and scenic were, hire tcrod or endangered species habitat, histu-ie or cultural sites, "'v tlanee flaodplains, or 'prime loi erilarrds? It is not anticipated development wo:itcl sf cct environmental' sensitive areas, h ev ver protect and follow established critical ares r::.ciulrtions within the Spokane Valley Sal urricipal Code. PL-22 V1 Page13af14 k7i 0 SEPt1 CIIECKI.IST - Valle. a. Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: To be determined at time of development. 4. How would the proposal be likely' to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? It is net located within shoreline jurisdiction and no impacts are anticipated; no impacts associated with land use are anticipated, as the allowed uses are consistent with existing developrr.enf_ Development shall follow regulations within the Spokane Valley Municipal Code, a. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: To be determined at time of development. 5, How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services a-id utilities? It is not anticipated development would increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities.The amendment would allow properties to develop consistent with adjacent properties of higher intensity uses and infrastructure is already constructed to serve new development. Any impacts will be reviewed add mitigated a.t the time of development based upon the re9u atiions within the Spokane Valley I1ilunicipai Code. a. Proposed measures to renuc': or respond to such rde-rnand(s) are: To be determined at time of development. 6. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may confiicc with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of#hc crivircn rnent. The proposal i,s not in conflict with any local, state or federal laws or requirern :its_,_{}Y the protec'tiort of t c environment. E. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, swear under penalty of perjury that the above responses are made truth-fully and to the best of roy knowledge. I also understand that, should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part, the agency may withdraw any Determination of Non- significance that it might issue in reliance upon this list, t5 i f Date: lc,' I signature.tY ( l CP, 1 { Please print or type: Proponent: Karen Kendall, Planner. c:ty of Spokane Vallev Community & Public Works becartrnent Address: 10210 East Sprague Avenue; Spokane Valley, WA 99206 Phone: .(6p5) 720-5026 Person completing form (if different from proponent): Name: Address: Phone: PL-22 V1.0 Page 14 of 14 . . .17 . . / . — `� �y _ ayv R. k \ q ^ . , y < » , eiA, 4 . �=« . . Ott2"\RANksh COMMUNITY &PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT woicane DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE NitileY" 102[0 East Sprague Avenue • Spokane Valley WA 99206 509.720.5000 R Fax 509,720.5075• planning r@spakanev+ailep,cug FILE NUMBER:CPA-2019-0009 PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: Propo-w ti io chi Comprehensive PCan land 'ase designation and zoning district from Multifamily Residential(MFR)to Corridor r.li. s tl Usc(CMU). PERSON COMPLETING CHECI{L.1S'r': Kasen Kend;311, 1'Iaa ac:.; City c Spokane r`[;11 y, 102:0 East Sprague Avenue; Spokane Valley, WA 49206 APPLICANT: City ofSokane Valley; 10210 1 tht. 6pra!ue Avenue; Spokane Valley, WA 992.0+5 OWNERS: Ronnie and Bonnie Carlon, 130 Po\ 710, �J �.: c 11�:. wp.„ 99037 Sharon J insert, 1361)7 l:. i.li:•,:,:<,,i ,.' • :i evi . poc_Lo._ ` [tw, 'r1 }'aZ]6 Jerry Ljo 1?-77.: rY;i;H or: At .: pukanc Il�ti WA 1)()2 6 Joit. I'41,i scar 13519 wl]-;ie•ii ; ert " Spol:<;n: Va1Cey 1':' i."99216 On The Solid Rock We 7;I,iri.1, [.i C ', I: '3 •'.IJ E. tviririetta Av ,rI ii, Ste. 5, Spokane Valley, WA 99216 Congo Iidatod [:rip,atis;ta 4l%:,t i ib 1 ' I+,. ['.. i s0 lid, ';; ..w,i teres Road, Spokane Valley, WA 99016 Herrc'orson i.cti:tc} LLC. . i il, .�.I„ [.rtkfv WA 99019 lriHrnsir;al Pig LTD ]'artn.,.:r:,Iile, 6710 ' ';1!,<<.'hack 1:•,,.:rd, Ste. 200,Scottsdale, AZ 85251 '?ROPOSALLOCAT1ON: Pal i i iie.in, ,rr 4 .r! i.;: I 4.91S], 45104.0324, 45]04.0315, 15161.1.0311, 45104.0307, 45104.0308, 45104.0330, 4'5.104.0320. .1,, ,•x1323, 45104.0327" and, 451;''..x: : lurtss4'4; as 13303, 13507, 13515, I: 51':7, 13611? and 13621 1,:{.ca lviis.,_at5 Avenue, located tr:; +li i,l kis•.•:i-;,u.Avenne between the intersections of rvi Avertue and iv14Domild Rii i!c1 ai i l Irl i;;siun Avenuc .:n.] '..1;.,IT!,21 Road, further located In Section 4 ofTro.vuH,ip 25,Range 44, NVillamc!tt. 1 l.:::lien Spokane LEAD AGENCY: City of Spokane Valley Pursuant to Titic 2.1 (Environmental Controls) of airs :;VMC.', the lead atcricv for tli pre r:us 1 has determined c1 dict it does not have a probably: siL nifica„7t aci'•ersc. impact on the cnvimntttutit. Aa Env iranrncrrrr tall `hrr,pacl Stateiticat (E:IS) i"s rpt ri;c]erirecl uncles ROW 43.7 IC'A30(2)(c), This decision wa.s atacic oiler review of a completed cnvirc:nrnei>.:a] clueck[ist and other information on File with the lead agri ic.y. This information is available to the pail die on request. DETERMINATION: This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11.340(2 j; the lend agtnc`4' 'gev3E1 not act it this proposal for 14 days front the date issued. Comments must he rece<ivcici by S:44t p.71:1-OP Febrilary 22, 2019. STAFF CONTACT: Karen Kendall,Pla'rtne,r,City or 'H 11. 1v!r; Valley Community and Public Works. . . Department, 10210 East Sprague Avenue, Spoken° V_v i kry-, WA 99206,PH:(509)720-5026(EX(.50) 720-5075, kkei:dallecsDokanev°allev,or'a City of poka!IC Vi.ley February$,2Q19 i)cru:rrt:i:), un o`No -Sieni5c:uiice(DNS) Pavlof-2 Fii<! No i-.I'.-; 014-ti)O{9 RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: Lori Barlow, AICP, Senior Planner, City of Spokane Valley Community and Public Works Departnrient, L021(3 East Sprague Avenue,Spokane Valley,WA 99206, Pit (509) 720- 5335NX(509)720,-5075, LbarIcrwps okarrae:Loi.4 r DATE ISSUED: February R. 2019 S 1;r12.-vr TJRE: -.1641L APPEAL An apptzql Lu PLiblIC Works Department within ) bt°.; Writ/ spiicfa.ctual. l71 conformance ',xi:1h Spokane 17.90 Appeals. and ally pursuant to Citv's adopted pLHc tin Dfappt!al ubinir' IF WAC appci-11.-; n rvjew oia final threshold February II„2019 ;Fir'ohm uf Ni Page 2 of2 :2'14 ,- rzev_, ... •,':4,„,,•'-...-.-.. ' ierkM'f„I-'7,-,.7...4'A'SI,AL.H. t•:.r,51.102..'0i,' 1.4:-.4,,,1,1 t,: 4 7 6 ... . . COMMUNITY & PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT • SCITV Ors 102°'11411144Z12441,. BUILDING & PLANNING DiVISION V polia.nelleY NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING 10210 E Sprague Ave •Spokane Valley WA 99206 509720.5240 • Fax: 509.720.5075 • planning@spokanevalley.org Date of Notice! 'February 13, 2019 Pursuant to Spokane Valley Municipal Code ( VMC) 17:80.120, Notice of Public Hearing, the Building & Planning Division is sending notice to all property owners within CO8feet of the subject property. Public Hearing Date and Time: February 28,2019, beginning at 6:00 p.m. Hearing Location: Spokane Valley City Council Charn be,rs,City Hall Project CPA-2919-0009 Number: Apiliatio proposal to change Comprehensive Plan land ;iso ci at i and zoning district from Description: Multifamily Residential cV[ER)to Corridor ivlixec; Usc (Cry111)_ Lototion: Parcel numbers 45104.9150, 45104.915], 451 4 5 1 G.-.015, 4 5 104.1::r3 1, 451_01.9307, 45104.0308, 45104_0330, 45104,0329, 4510,1_0323, 415104, 3`21 and, i 04_9328, addressed as 13303, 13507, 1 3: iS, 13319, 13607 and IS ')' East Niiis-fion Avenue, located north of Mission Ayorine hctwcci tic- inti3r!.;e;:.iiotrz; of jssion Avenue and McDonald Road nig: Missior, Nianicir koad., further located in Section 4 of Township 25, Spokane Com Wash6gton City of Spokane Valley, 10210 L 'pIa['uL A vt n spOk.,• fIC ' ll[c W 1920c rs: Ronnie arid Bonnie Carlson, PO Div, 710., Vc:..:ida If% WA c}',402:; Sharon Jansen, 13607 E.. M iss i on 1,..veutie, Spokane Volk). WA 99216 •i.-rry Kjos, 13519 E. Mission Spokam.‘.. \talky WA 99:-1.[ Massong, 13515 F Missior. fic,ic nuc Spokane Vallcy, WA 1)921 6 _ (ii The Solid Rock We Seind, LLC, 15320 E. Mai-iutta Avt.milc, S . 5, Spubrie. ]in 11) 5triu1 Na. 19, 120 N. (ircolac-.. Road, Spokai t I ,ake, WA 99019 • Whim Acai Pig LTD Pal (.171U Li.Cainclback Road, Ste.. 200, Scoitsila le,AZ "pat.., of • Ap heat ion: Sialf Contact: Karen Keint-iii ' F. v;r1k)., wA 9924, Hearing Procedures: Th(', Spokane Valley Planning Comm issini: lunrinp pursmiit tio the Planning Com:111--;s:on [inks persr:rt:iiv Li I Li clic public hea.ing Kid rfloy submit •,'il'itten til; Nt 1114j 1-c.nr :)Lintun:, Commission tidy ILinit the :Uric 1iicri 1 Thu munk!-•ion will roconink.:-Idation on the request td . Coum'il. N(Y1.10:: planning to atleni die meeting who require sPLuia] assiq;p_L-L: 1;ciiriu.5 i otlici- impairr,it•nN. .-7.o[1tact the City Clerk at (509)720-5000 as. s,:ion ispus.si We so that arrangomcnts may be made, A :.iafi rrqiori: will be available for inspection seven (7) calendar Jays before the hearing at the •1ni1ru1nhiL s.:. Public Works Department, located at the Spokane 14all, 10210 East Sprague 8:00 am and 5:00 pm, Monday-Friday, excluding La 1:cia,,,,; icl written comments to thc Spok ilk,/ Community& Public Works Department, Karen Kendall +rn. Chad Rirgys Herat: Wednesday, January 9, 2019 8:17 AM To: Karen Kendall Cc: Ray Wright Subject: RE: Request far Comments - CPA-Z019-0009 • L94l(3J9 ��:,,.,�r:�:5 .. JI !r= ?�r� il ! r,i;1,r Than:. . 10_0 - .sr�akeieLill�,ti r�ri3 SliVrikarl:\***% at ley )rrt: Karen Kendall Sent: Thursday,January 3, 201911:59 AM To: 'Central Wiley School District#356'<jrowell@casd,org>; 'CenturyLink' cKaren.Stoddard@centurylink.cnrn>; 'Chris Johns::on' crjohnston@s pokanesheriff.arg>; 'Chris Knudson'<CKnudson cz spnkanecaunty.org>; 'Christina Janssen (City of Mil/ food' <planning©miilwoodwa.us>; 'Cindy Anderson'<cyarr161-@ery.+.'a.P,ov>; 'City of Spokane TirrnJl Black' <thiar:k@spakanecity.org>; 'Corin Depner'cCDEPNIEIti, .si;I kanecoirriy or •-; 'C',:n <br,,f=7n_ ric;hard;on c@cable.comcast,com>; 'Consolidated Irri7;itian [liar <:r r; t,` ,;;. , ,.;r lialatedirrit;.:ric,nCc mcast.net ; 'East Spo ane Water District #1' <dist`t@conicast.net>; 'East V_,l,rk..`Yc iai:,l 11it.irict 33b1' - s nit :Llicoevsd.orga; 'Inland Power E Eight' ccannienC}inlandpower.corn>; ')acob 1V1cCann'clm ,-.1,Fw .gov> It iil_I 4;tnne <mstnne[ spiakanevaliey_org); 'Modern Electric Water Corrlpany'<modc.m.o..r 1 wco r:;,rn>; 'Patnnrtrw, Prr:r4 (Pi`RKS' <Ierian `'i;tnortE,tie7VARI S_WA,GC V).; Ray Wright<rwrightl spckanevallr:'•'-: r{ :; `Spokane Aquifer Joint <11-1fo@spokane;i[laifer_org>; 'Spokane County Planning & Building'cjperor:rl(r°sr, ,:canecounty.org>, 'Spoxane County Cscwd3@camcastnet›; 'Spokane Region& Cle2n Air A pricy' f1viestil r z ! °=" �,C�sfsokanecleanair.crga; Spokane Rep I. irt,l IIPZ Itti District'<psavage@srhd.org>; 'Spokane- Regimi,.l r"ansportation Council' r ;teWart@'S!i i( .[ir y ; 'Spo!cane Transit Authority'<kotterstrom; spai..,ry ti",nsitcam ; 'Spakan TriI t c- Indio:ins' r >ndya@skr;.karlOrit.:.,:oTn>; 'Traci Harvey,Spokane Valley 1-ire Dept C§;o. 1'<Harve yTfr spokariev !leyilre. :.im>; `Vera ,Maier P,. Power' kwel]s .verawaterandpawer.carn>; 'WA$ orirTI rce' <nevi'ewtean1 Pcomnic ::r','JU? o ) 'WA D!`pt et Arch erica Hist Preservation' <Gretchen.I aehler[iaDAHP.wa_rt0':, 'WA Ecology,Olympia' <s paurlit( ecy•f.a.gnv?; 'Wfk. Fish & IIdF i*' <SEPAdesk@cifw.wa,go, ;'WA Natural Res.-}.J"c r";' r�r,rri w Ir�Iri,r�tC4auf7 • ov ; 4rParIc;;' Chris,g,iic.Ic,tti c@l]arks,wa.gov>; 'WATransportation' { i`�I LF (uL+J;c`rCada.t;::d ' Lkanu Val ey Fin' Dep drnent <insoectia[Is @spo kanevalleyfirecom,>; 'Chris 4 !afstet, Lbii COW' ,:cv:,,fste:.:`!nl ,•dc_ .cam ; lt,tci,insanid76@gwestoffice.net'; 'La iry.e.ostwald@p65.com', 'irti: ,fattr(:,4Mrirl;iuJireless.rlet': .4:.king rs.dfwv.wa.gov';Chad Riggs‹c:i[tgs( spokaneval;ie5,f.or ,.>; Jenny i�.li,: kerson <ir izkr:rson@spokanevalley,arg>; c:ri rlow@spakaneva'ley c i!>; {47i1;r F3;,singer<rnba it°,;, r ; :,1._t]], r'AiCI Chaz Bates r?,.: +:s .r} pokaneualley.arg>; Michael I roemming<rnfrcemming@spuinevalle,t ,arg>; "mlong@scfd$.org'; 'orctiardaveirrigationdist6@ACamcastnet'; 'timo_llrnorgan ' wvscI_org°; 'rick([i7i'ire{fi' Cfr '; 'info@modirr,org'; 1 'lkey@iibertylakewa.gov' Cc: Cohn Quinn-Hurst<cghurst@spol(anevalley.org> bJect: Request far Comments-CPA-2019-0009 III, Please review the attached Environmental Checklist and associated materials for the following project: Project Name: City Initiated Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment File#:CPA-2019-0009 Parcels:45144.9150, 45104.9151, 45104.0324, 45104.0315, 45104.0311,45104.0307, 45104.0308,45104.0330, 45104.0329, 45104.0323, 45104.0327 and, 45104.0328 Ft you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Best regards, ; ren Kendall I Planner 10210 E.Sprague Avenue I Spokane Valley,WA 9920E (509)720-5025 I Is c rida1l@soc anevel. v.firg rn 1+F,#f�F�" ail This email and any actecnrrlenLs may be subject k disclosure pursuant to Washington State's Publrc Record Act,chapter 42.55 RCW. 2 Karen Kendall +m= glarnchette,Jake <Blanchettel@5pokeneValleyFire.corn> Sent: Thursday,January. 10, 2019 B:BO AM To: Karen Kendal! Subject: CPA-2019-0009 ,Attachments: CPA-2019-41009 KendalI.pdf Please see the attached review letter for CPA-2019-0009. Thanks, Jake Blopr:hctte k,[, 'ari Fire DeporRent 1:!:,09)8•92-4121 1 41^a _ , p$4,,,A: i --4-4ty......471-Rytyr-6-6.c,;,."7 02 \t. t M , t .� *` -'1 fi i BRYAN COLLINS FIRE CHIEF 2120 hi.Wilbur S paha-e Valley,WA 99206 (5139)928-1700 Main January 10, 2019 ( ) 89212 Fax speileaneualieyfire,com City of Spokane Valley 10210 E. Sprague Avenue Spokane Valley, WA 9920a RE: CPA-2019-0009 Technical Review Comments The Spokane Malley Fine Department hes completed the review for the above referenced project and has no comments on the SEPA checklist_ Specific tare department requirements shat#be conditioned on future permits_ If there are any questions please do not hesitate to call, S incerely. Jacob Blanchette Environmental'Engineer Spolane Valley Fire Department Karen Kendall n: Figg, Greg <FiggG@w.sdot•wa_gov> Sent: Wednesday, January 16r 2D19 5:41 PM To: Karen Kendall Cc: Kay, Charlene; Ray Wright Subject: RE: Reglaest for Comments - CPA-2019-0009 Good atterncon Karen, in regard to the proposed Corrprehensive Pian aitierid ment, the Wa shingter. 5tace Department Ci Transpur:et on rWS!IDDT; is requesting additio'nel information regarding the change from multifamily T'".9.5idt=nt:al to Mixed Use Corridor. Without additional traffic inforriatiori WSDOT cannot deterxint what the impacts to SR 27 will he. The SEPA ci7ecklist make; mention in Section . item 8 that an FRS was prepared for the recent C in-iipre°,e siw Plan update. While this is "rite we do rot see h0'i. .. = •:r7Jortt thLe Li �4 �I is S a ='s n e tt.ti the „tier ren- plan ailid t!lr i7 :u o l the ?fIS !i':�'Fr11'i ;w" i ' WOUid 7can 'r;ll� l ai_'' C WEA v�JlrY3r7_ T f'i lard. -1 +"ai eig,ein='1'it Act under SCW 36.'0,01.0'7J ifi ',c' .III regi_iires that --"koac '-i' ;5 i �l�ur[�9!:i' :•o-ern be identified acid addressed as pari of the Comp,;:.ensive Plan, which has riot occurred in thisir.:,tacice_ Tin wait until the building permit stage does not give the agencies and informed c r,portunit';' to cfn„I: on the appi-apriaiSS of the land use c ar_r nor would it address the cumulative impacts This proposal can later be :.r;.'.en ou t to inulripce t•rci?:ts some vithich may br e_r_mr; frau 75FA at time of buiiiti ng permit, e tyle other comprehensive. plan :ousels :bait have been submitted, a trip geinirKl..io+i letter is needed to unclerr;and difference in trip:.- t'-ns propc l would create frcrn the cJrrenr cornprehensi• plan de:igrasi:,ri ii,•VSDOT requests mat t'nis nrc:ia icon be provided before a determtnation i>rade on this requested 7,"i„Y_,_h ::;"e plan change. Please da not ho.sit-ate to contact me ;i you shouki have an? g'u. stiditi • ;in^rrc•ly, Grey, ' igg DeNcIupment Services Manager WSDOT Eastern I.egian (509) 324-6199 figg.g@wsclot.wa*dv From: Karen Kendall ckkencdaltspokarrevally.org. Sent:Thursday, January 3,2019 11:59 AM To:'Central Valley School District#356"<jroweIl cv5d,org>; 'Centucytink' <Karen,Stoddard@centurylink•com>, 'Chris Johnston' <crjoknston@spokaE esher ff,orp; 'Chris Knudson'<CKnudson@spokanecounty.org>;'Chr€stina Janssen{City of <planning@millwraeadwa.us>; 'Cindy Anderson' <cyan461C ecy.wa.gov>; 'City of Spokane Tirrell Black' <tbiack spoka rieeity.org>; 'Colin.Delmer' <CDFP INERgspokanecounty,org>; 'Camcast' cbryr'an_richardson@cable.corncast.com>; `Consolidated Irrigation district#t1.ig'<consolidatedirrigation@corncast.net>; 1st Spokane Water District#1"cdistl@@comcast.net>; 'East Valley School District 4361'<.srnithLQ@evsd.crg›; 'Inland ;ger& Right'<connien@iniandpawer.com—'Jacob rilidCann'<Jrnca461 ecy_we.gov>; Mike Surae <rnstonegspokanevalleyr:org>; 'Modern Electric Water Company' <r odern amewco.cora>, 'Patnoder Brian (PARKS' ‹Briart.Patnode u1PARKS.WA_GOV>; Ray Wright<rwright[spakanevalley.org.; 'Spokane Aquifer Joint Baird' info@spokaneaquifer.orp; 'Spokane County Planning& Building' 1pederson@5pokanecountyr.org>; 'Spokane County i Water District#3' <scwd3 comcast.net>; 'Spokane fiegiona! Clean Air Agency' <FwaE.tby'{zospokaneclennair.�r� 'Spokane Regional Health District' ‹psaysge@srhd.org>;Stewart, Ryan (SVC)crstewtartia) rtc.cri > C}tter,5tr:in,, I(e:rl tterstrom@Spok:anc.-l ransit.com>;'Spokane Tribe of Indians' randya@spr kanetrihe.canr>; 'l r Li H'ar'vey, 5polmt Fire Dept No. 1' <1 r2r,.reyT lspokanevalleyfire.com>; `Vera Water& Power' <ku':alis[ veraavateraradlao+,ver,curri>, '‘N‘-%Commerce' <reviewtemn comrrrerce.wa.gov>; 'WA Dept of Asch and Hist PreservaLion` <Gretchen.Kaehler@DAHP.•Na•gov>; 'WA Ecology, Olympia' <sepaunit ecy.worgov>; `kalrl Fish &Wildlife' <SEPAdesk4dfw.wa.gov>; 'WA Natural Resources'<northeast.re,gion r@r dr"7r.Wa.uov->; Parks' <Chris.guidottig parks.wa.gov>; Figg,Creg c-FiggG@Arsdot.wa goo>; 'Spokane van-I f=ire C7.•Ipartmertt' <inspections spokanevalleyfire.com>; 'Chris Wa1stet, MECUM'<cwafstet@melorrr,_cnni:; 'HutchinSDnid15@cit,:;-.:;7,fsire.nryr..; `L-arrv.e,astwald@p66.corn'; 'inainwaterOtwintivoirc 'leslie.king dfw_w,_i'4, , i s:r LiF _', criggs0,a ;:,c,kanevalley,org>;Jenny folic l.i t.,,"n :irli; { ?i.e�c�,.•!;., cva.ley.org ; Lori Barlow <fbarlow;,� F .); ao r ill Sf.Ur , i �i.: inl;er mhasirrgeri s,c�l' a ,f,:liic lr:, h,: f I'.,"�{:4 <cbates@o spikar, ..r!:Jley.org>, Michael "orchardaveirrigatrorrlli;t5[Ca'a1cost.net'; 'tic : Jiilr 11o1 irl[", •,;,;tr{ ";] �' 1<Sr,'f'iliniiri.Jr 'i 'info@rrhodir".org''; 'IkeyIibertylakemoa• av' Cc: Colin CtLlinra•%ir:r ccclhurst[ spakanevalleyr.c rg> Subject; Reques,: lur ;.amrnents- CPA-2019-0009 A€I, Please review the att�ch•od Environmental Checklist and associated materials for the following project: Project Name: City Initiated Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment File #: CPA-2019-01009 ?arceis:4510 -.9150,45104.9151,45104.031x,45104.[:315,45104,p311,45104.0307,45104.0308, 45104,0330, 45104.0329,45104.0323,45104.0327 and,45104.0328 u hal/0. any questions, please do nct hesitate to contact me. Best regards, Karen Kendall ' planner 1.029.07 E.Sprague Avenue 1 Spot rye Valley,WA 99206 (509)120.5026 I klt frSl ;l � roc an �aClev�,r Spokane Mi This email end any attachments may be subject to disclosure pursuant to Washington State's Public Record Act.chapter 42.56 9CW. 2 Karen Kendall •on': Depner, Colin 'cCDEPNER.Ca spokanecouryty.org> Fent: Friday,January 18, 2019 5207 PM To Karen Kendall subject: Project-CPA2019-0009 Attachments. r PA Comrnents.rtf 11i Karen- Please SPF the attached comments. Thank you. Colin Depner Spokane County Environmental Services 1026 W. Broadway Ave.4th Floor Spokane, WA 99260 509-4)7-7282 cdepner@spokanecourty.org Video Inspection, Requests sew erTVrequests@spokanecvunty-org 'ectronic Plan Submittal ESPlanReview@spokanecounty.org 1 T Karen Kend+I (City/Spokane Va ey-Com Community DeAWpmen( CC: From: Colin Depner Date Friday, jan p9 :% 2018 Pl ingJ m inr : Su iect CPS 2019-0N g Stug Com9rh nsiPhase: CPA - ZONE CI d e FAO] The SpoV,Hre ?A r§ Eamr nmenQ|Se vices D parm e% has no objection to the Finalization of @e above meeen jQ [ Karen Kendall 1: Ostwald, Larry E <Larry.E.astwalcf@pr66.corn> Sent: Thursday,January 3, Z019 12:38 PM To; Karen Kendall Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL]Request for Comments - CPA-2019-00D9 No impact to Yellowstone Pipe Line Company. Sent frorn my iPhone On Jan 3, 2019, at 1:28 PM, Karen Kendall cickendall@spokanevalley.org> wrote: All, Please review the attached Environmental Checklistand associated matmial5 for til&following pr. le,c(: Project Name: City initiated Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment File t:: CPA-2019-0009 ?arcel.s: 45 i Cia.9151-1, LI-510 .9351, Ri 1704, "..Snel,13312 , Cy! HD, 0'D.1.04.0307, 15:104.030S, 45104.C3:SO,45:10LU32.'), l' 5102! 451Dt.-.0327 cinr 15:104,032/3 If you have any questions, please du no 1,esitaEe to r or Tnct rns. Best regards, Karen Kendall I Planner 10210 E.Sprague Avenue Spokant / Ile WA ValliQ206 L509)720-b,026 Ikken_joilitjj.:L <irrrage001.jpg> This ernai[and any attachments may be subject to disclosure pursuant to Washington Staters Public Record Act,ctapter 456 RCW, <CPA-2 D19-0009 SEPA R.outing.pdf> <CFA-2019-0009 vicinity rna.p.pdf> EXHIBIT 7 CPA-2019-0009 Additional Agency Comment(s) Project Dame: City Initiated Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment File #: CPA-2019-0009 Parcels: 45104.9150, 45104.9151, 45104.0324, 45104.0315, 45104,0311, 45104.0307, 45104.0308, 45104.0330, 45104.0329, 45104.0323, 45104.0327 and, 45104.0328 This Trip Generation and Distribution Letter (TGDL) is being prepared to support the State Environrnental Policy Act t;SE.PA) application for a city initiated Comprehensive Plan Amendment ,(CPA) for changing an existing Multifamily Residential (MFR) to a Corridor Mixed Use (CMU) land designation. This letter estimates the trip generation of the current zoning versus the trip generation that ::could occur if the land were developed under the proposed new land use. Project Description CPA-2019-0009 is bounded to the south by the 13000 block of Mission Avenue, between McDonald and Maurer Roads. The CPA is situated about half way between interchanges of I- 90's Exit 289 at Pines (SR27) and Exit 291A at Evergreen. The Valley Hospital is less than half a mile to the west and Spokane Valley Mall is a mile to the east. r.#x...,IP cr,.It 4 ' ,..,r- ::. ,-- ,7, - - w:...� �,~ ' .4,,y 1-90 Exit 289 , , r 1 :( .ems} . ' . Pines (5R-27) I-T'r . , i'MVA:6!•• �,- . ,�:f t - C_ 2019-0t309 - - q::yyam� �71 ' Hospital t' •+ L . ----- _ _;,a__ I. .„�.a.-,m. DOQ-Jrif7 Ai6 �1" ` . '■; ' We 1:. -d`90Exii291.4 �A '- EPA Easement it-4' ! tr--VS 1- °,5,- a , ._ x - 4 ,° ,,. r + t °r4 -.e-1 i "- Evergreen Road r• Tr.' f r:5e. -9r • Y . ,,, 7 w :1 rR %•.- r icr f'F::r x r i If.. 1 tom'}ij';v'+,' cry a ,'r It •- ''- : �:,q � � ,kl� t " `' "ur°"p't . r° [ . - _ m q ►. .� . '�4 'rs �`� a' r r , 'g. .„"=---. r r w ^' ,r.-.I : y. �,:,_,f,�,'-„ f r , —' a ° ! )_ ` b .I",.. ! t -- ', • .,1.. " ,, °w y., --- w- . .`.. F i. 7 P J q n 9 it r RF 9 }�4.M h b; 'I Wage Trip Generation There are 12 parcels for this proposed comprehensive plan amendment totally approximately 17.5 acres. A 150 foot easement for the Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) bisects the site that prohibits structures within the easement. The BRA e escmcnt reduces the buildable area by 2.7 acres. The remainder equates to a total of 14.8 acres of developable property. Under the current zoning (MFR), the available density allows 22 apartments per acre. If these densities could be realized, 325 apartment units could be built within the area. The total expected trips for all available property in the proposed comprehensive plan amendment are shown below for both the AM and PM peak periods. AM Peak Hoar Trips PM Peak Hoar Trips Directional _ Directional tni. ''oluu� Das�trrhrrtr'rrrl �- Dislrr'larrtirrtr .0.46 ri,f? 0.56 PM Trips per 23%. 77% Trips per 63% 37% Unit in Ottt Unit In Oat Apartments (3 25 Dwelling Units) MFR 150 34 116 182 115 67 After conducting a literature review, it was found that commercial developments have been surveyed in various jurisdictions and typical Land to Building ratios calculated (see attached article). This ratio is determined simply by dividing the square footage of the land parcel by the square footage of the building, Typical values in urban areas are 2.5 and those in suburban areas 3.5. Using a land to building ratio of 3.5 for the purposes of determining the potential building sizes would be 14.8 acres ` (43,500 sq ft/acre) 1 (3.5) = 184,000 sq ft To evaluate the reasonableness of the 3,5 Land to Building ratio selected, a scaled map of the site showing building footprints that add to 184 004 square feet of useable property was drawn for single and two-story buildings, Cir Single-Storer Den ill'of 184,000 Square Feet of Buildings on 14.8 Acres 2IPage 101 . Twa-Store Density of 184,000 Square Feel of Buildings on 14.8 Acres Corridor mixed use under the City's zoning allows for Apartments, General and Medicalrgental offices, and Retail and commercial development. Because of the site's proximity to the hospital, opportunities for general and medicalldental offices could be considered in combination with housing. Finally, there are opportunities to have retail and commercial development that would support the residences and cater to people working at offices throughout the day. What the development may become if the City Initiated Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment's permitted might be these land uses and their expected peak hour trips: AM Peak Hour Trips PM Peak,Your Trips DwellingDirectional Directional P Lagar!Use Zoning Volume as 'Volume a Units �� Distribution VlDistribution 0.46 AM 0,56 PM Trips per 23% 77% Trips per 63% 37% Unit In Out Unit In Out .Aparginents CMIU 120 55 13 le 67 AM Peak Hoar Trips PM Peak Hoar Trips Volume ;:. Volume Land Use{7111} ZoningDirectional 1.15 PMI 1Jiredkiiira( Distribution Distribution Trips per Tales per. 1,000 86% 14% 1,806 16% 84% GFA hr Out GFA In Oat General Office CMU 30,000 35 30 5 6 29 31 age AM Peak flour Trips PM Perk limit Trips Volume ! Volume(a, ..,, Dir°ectwvai .Directional 78 AM .3.46 PM Distribution Distribution Trips per Trips per 4 1,000 78% 22% 1,000 28% 72% ' GFA In Out GFA In Out '1 Ldical/Dentin Office is C m U 20,4:. ' f 04 56 min 69 19 50 ,.., AM Petri, Hour Trips PM Peak Hour Trips Valium ; Volume ta,1 L[rrrtf1se z. Direeliorral Dir¢ctitarrtrr • 0.94 AM 3,81 PM Distribution Distribtrliou i Trips Per Trips per iiiiiiminimi 1,010 62% 38% 1,000 48% .52 1••''' 416, GFA In Oat GEA hi Out Retaii/Commurciai CIM! 40,000 1=1 24 16 1662 EllE Total Expected Trips for CMU Land Use 18 4 73 32.3 140 163 Subtracting the peak hour trips for the current zoning of MFR from those that would be expected if CMLJ were allowed to develop gives a difference between the two land uses_ The City Initiated Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment could have a net increase on traffic volumes of 34 during the AM peak hour and 141 during the PM peak hour. 4IPage Traffic Trip Distribution Using current traffic information for Mission, Pines, McDonald and Evergreen gives a trip distribution on a percentage and number of new PM peak hour trip basis as shown here: Net PM Peak Hour Trips CMU - MFR CPA-201940009 rasa pairni„sry- City initiated Camp Plan "9 0 Map Amendment CPA-2019-0009 +-w-7 i2e. %, Azo -17 Crf 19 i7 a 794. 1#hi i_ 5R% 29 1- 4:;•' • • 70 t e.. .., T-°. .... 5 15 41 Olt • Z " ;V' Traffic Mitigation In June, 2016, the City evaluated traffic operations in the Mirabeau Subarea then and into the future to 2040. The Subarea includes the Pines Road (SR-27) corridor from Mission Avenue to Trent Avenue, along Mission Avenue to Evergreen Road to the east, the i-90 Evergreen Exit 291A interchange, Indiana Avenue west to Mirabeau Pkwy end Pines Road (SR-27). The Mirabeau Subarea identified future projects that need to be constructed in order to accommodate future growth within the area in order to insure the City will have the street infrastructure needed to support planned development. The project costs were estimated and a proportionate share of$323.75 per new pm peak hour trip was established in the report. When the plan was completed, the City established a "trip bank"that listed the number of new pm peak hour trips that are available upon the adoption of the plan. As development has occurred since 2016, developers submit a Trip Generation and Distribution Letter (TGDL)that presents the number of new trips and identifies their traffic pattern. Each of these de"velj jments paid a pm per peak hour trip cost and these trips are then deducted from the City's trip bank. 5IPage At this Um , e:e are adequate pm peak hour trip, to allow this Ci\ Initiated Comprehensive Plan Nap Amendment lithe developer, al the time of development, pa a voluntary impact fee of 2.75 fur each of their new pm peak hour M that would use the Pines (SR-27) corridor. . � I 2 • q % if WAS* / , ® 1111.1'0%;:s " i . < ,1/ 4 \q -cr 11,11;11 ) 25§ ° • � i A ci § � Page 2/21/2019 Calculating Land lc Build'rig Ratio and 1Uhy It Mailers REAL ESTATE Or BASICS How to Calculate the Land to Building Ratio A low ratio indicates that the property is being fully used BY JAMES KIMMONS Updated September O9.201B Every structure occupies 3 certain portion or percentage of the land parcel on which it sits. This percentage or ratio of the size of the building to the land is called the "land to building ratio." When it's high, the property isn't being used to its fullest potential. When it's low, the property is already at full capacity. The Calculation Divide the square footage of the land parcel by the square footage of the building to arrive at the land to building ratio. Here's an example: 188,000 land square feet divided by 43,500 building square feet equals 4.32 This is a 4.32:1 land to building ratio. and it's actually r r the high side. The average is between 2.5:1 to 3.5:1. Is It Important for Residential properl it's? The land to building ratio isn't reported in all appraisals. In fact, it's rarely seen in residential appraisals. There are many municipal codes and property restrictions that can lint the ratio. however. There might be a desire to 'Keep too sizc of homes to a certain percentage of the available lot space, Land to Building Ratio in Commercial Applications The Lr,-E-? of [he land to build ng ratio is much more prevalent in commercial and industrial applications. There are usually stringent requirements in building codes for the amount of parking that certain size structures must maintain, as well as setback and green .rea considerations, htips'tlwJsu.thtsataacesmb,comrriov,,-tatcaIcurate•tile-lana-to-huilding-ratio- 166427 10 2r2112O19 Calculating LEnd to ERA ding patio and V./Ay i! Mailers to 1 could be at maximum capacity or in violation of current codes due to grandfather clauses. The greatest number of considerations with municipal find other regulations occurs when you're working Vvith commercial, industrial, and institutional real estate. There could be EPA issues with industrial properlTes, :,rid there blight be hazardous materials to think about. rill-Er Relai➢ Simppi 14 . (. P CJ' CI NILE You won't final r; snapping mall or strip center in the middle of thousands of acres of i ;rri-rland. Popu ul-ion demographics are the first consideration in siting retail commercial buildings. There must be enough consumers to support the shops and businesses or there will soon be a shell building sitting empty. Traffic patterns are also important. In suburban situations, it's very important to have easy access to cars and lots of convenient parking. Sometimes it's enough to provide underground parking and rely also on walking traffic in an urban setting, Ratios of the tenant retail leases aces and the overall theme of the center L;rr'. important as well. There's often an "anchor tenant," the largest retailer that will draw the mcst traffic. Then there will be others who offer related but not necessarily competitive products and services. A major mall might have 20 clothing stores, but they each believe they have their niche customers and will do well. The anchor tenant, in this case, could be Macy's. Office Buildings These vary by the type of cfhces they'll house. A building catering to accountants, attorneys, and consultants would have certain space use requirements. and there might be one or more shared conference rooms for larger meetings. They might even share a receptionist to route calls and visitors. A medical office or dental office complex would have very different space requirements. especially when it comes to electric power and other special concerns related to the equipment being used. Medical office buildings might need more elevators or easier access situations for the aged or hrtps. vw.v_the.balar cesmb.com1how-te-calcufate-the-fang-to-txJilding-wid-28x6427 218 2/21/2019 Calculating Land to Building Raga and Why It Matters warenouses require a lot or space, anc they also require large truck ioacing accKS in some cases, They generally don't need much more in the way of parking spaces, however. Warehouses will usually have one or two areas set up for offices, but they won't have much in the way of amenities—just space, utilities, and phone service. Specialty businesses include auto repair shops. oil change businesses, and car and RV dealerships. They each have different needs as far as space and parking. Auto repair and oil change businesses have special needs for disposal of waste oil and other chemicals. Every cne. of these buildings and business types will have some concern for the land to building ratio_ The Value of l•'.}x:ct:ss Land The natur cf excel land and its zoning determine whether paying for it is a waste of capitt:;l. Can it effectively be sliced off and sold? It can if the overall land is comprised of two or more independent parcels, if the structure doesn't infringe upon one of them,and if the unused land has its own access. The same applies if it can be subdivided. Otherwise, you probably have no choice but to dedicate the excess land to future expansiorl...even if that's just a parking lot or storage. BASICS BASICS What Is Improved Land in Real Estate? Zoning and Land Use Codes—Are They Necessary? Mips. umv.thebalanceamb.nomfhovwta•caiculata-tha•land-ta.bullding-ratio-2866427 ora TAB 6 COMMUNITY AND PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIVISION ota101.1:4441111ftia, 4.0010%11eY STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION 2019 COMPREIHENSIVE PLAN TEXT AMENDMFNTS CPA-2019-0004,CPA-2019-11005,CPA-2(119-0006,CPA-2019-0007, CPA-2019-0008i.AND CPA-2019-0010 STAFF REPORT DATE: February 6, 2019 HEARING DATE AND LOCATION: February 28, 2019, beginning at 6.:00 p Spokane valley City Hall Comic LI Chambers, 10210 East Sprague Avernie, Spokane Valley, Wash in ocn 99206. IrizoNwAL DE;CRIP1 City Comprel•oii.7;ivL: Plan z-iiitelairnents CPA-:.T.,,Q-00/1,. -0005, - .01107,-00W_ mid-0610 in....hick:. -.lamer 2 11.:)1,;•..ic...s,and Chapter 1 i'inTorial z.lso in of a nn v.,. rrwl:S, and an Ii I is:my pLaIned Transporliva IIJlirove111ci11--,..!1 ]i,.. I11Ld 1 :1: I ori/40-, 1 ic amendments 1.. ,..11angcs t( .:.)1 kilicnts that reterc;Ice the ti I I cndnci LS. Farther details of Cny 1111 ;11":(_l iachniv Update mu CIH !1LII1rI slra[CL k:c lo RAU CIVI2 C:mipleted strate6es., update CPA-7019-0004: tiniclincl---;. mid ad icw sirites,i,:!..c.:!nsistani with the goals and polii.zieS in the conira..,dmuivc: ['law .:1111:1 bicycle colnin.,—..111..... ::.rt.l1:Transportario,.. 1:1-pinta1t and related :): 11;7,12'S. Dring to_supporL tilt cou-;itIca.mma ora CPA-2019-41106:CIA 2019I ij.it i: IFJ05\ 26,2 i1I:]d I:: . , oy CPA-2015-u6;n: -.N.:.tre1 pp.- adciptcd 1:'ll lor a 20-year period that is CPA-211'; 31Vt.off:IL-Al APPROVAL CRITVRIA: (.01norclicr.. .-.L..... Plan 2017-2037; Spokane Valley Ialunitipal Ccd (SVIV1C) 17 80_140, mid SVNIC 19.30 01.0 Ar..F Mike Basinger, A1CP. Fuonorriic 1)cveloprnent Manager; Chaz Bates,AICP, 11IiI4A. DC%,:1:101-,inCril SPCULiliiSA.; Colin \ :I'. Friaiporiation Planner Exhibit 1: Erwirourncritel Checklist Exhibit 2: DNS 3: Notice of Pn-..1 1-Tearing 1':•<11;11it 4: 1-N11.1.1ii 5! 1)i.j1 L-.114111,!nts to ((TA-2019..000;o 6! ;lir(Aid 1.1,1 Cllarth..2Goals and (C.:1'3..2.01C+M(10(..1, Dr.n11 Chiiicr :7! .eN( ,cC111,.-20 I 9-0005, trinTnoation) lit 27 3110E (Cl'A .".1.11 9-0007) 1:1),IiiLik 9 DMA ACI.)".az't1 (1:10g) Staff Report CPA-2019-0004,CPA-2019-0005,CPA-2019-0006,CPA-2019-0007, C '0 1.16 CPA-20 r.9-01)10 Exhibit 10: Draft new Appendix B:20-year Transportation Project Li • • I.:I 110) A- BAA:it..:i-:.-:,RouNi) i.017 PI-5a tt.lovy. In the periodic updaie, the City developed a serics of implementation tcaL: u; tied ur various goals and pciliojes of Plan. The in1r:10 v..71.F.: IdirlitifY leads fcr ii1112.10FTM:11Wic.fl. I e.orroJction, and u Sl .! pHor.tv. Thc! str.11, ? :;, rnanda(ory Liiiii ielp onj,ar. inun'LenntAtation activities ,1 -,d di recta ii poliodk Find trautes as steges are completed or more information is obtained.. 'At. proposed .1.-.wii;nerits to the strategies remove coAr.r ictecl strategies, yid iL. biH ru. add new strategies consistent %vit. ihu goiLk and CPA-2019-0005 [1.AirnrIn !rid hicv-,itt n-nprovoinetir :wore carried ki 1, Oplate from the Illeye.e and Pedestrian iviasret Piogram. The p1.6d,y,;,...d ,...'Aainges are 10 [L!fieell projects -,)11(1 current need: used on ti.; I ;.let,elopit-m-t pat tenri. community It-ettl)nek. An ii LIt. I ...vas used lo..,-,;]hcit cotruntinIty incliidi11;!, I 70 :',7! rif Ill ',Luc] likOi-C 012:1 30 additicrial, u; i iii person pohlic rneetilif!,s at evoras and throtit2itoia t:ity. CPA-2019-0006 Since the of[lie t....."0-nipichensiv Pinii lila ri;C:."..:1VCCI a ntruber of inierntai Alicx Li tiori alto the Cily, thstie cI ea dterii iircd har. franiewprk for a1lniea ti LU. ! V.: 1 I i.'.1picnid.c: directizn to potential a i.n.licants atul iiinLuNation requests. The oroprvori .1:1;in.:1117. require die:City to ikvoll.);) ITilt:A-la For IjniiiriiIv ilentifjv land use dr,iip.,natiorr4 far and irlentiry impacts of piidiii acid Hic!„ the anocxation. area. CPA-2019-0007 pocIL:cirian and bicycle were III,. Con.prohensive Plan Update from 111(2 BOCyck. wid A •-•..rrIc,:riisic...EIL5 are intended co reflect cornp!olcd projec+.F., and pil keocls Sill current truvd.and deval opulent patterns :lot! Al c \ 0008 n .,Ii-a-t.,1Nclisive Plan Was tic‘...clopotl and (aft.4oti te kn an online d . irwi etwrQu1 technology to allov, users who are vie,,ming the ird.nActive nears rriw dinc a,tti dt to re.ad. Ftic: prcioris.cd anKI:Inlciti re-creates the entire maps to an 11"x tr 1,,!tn:Ii i.; 10, an'l ; ;; ;0 1, nuilg; ;;';111;:. arc p.:r..casci Staff Report CPA-2019-0004,CPA-2019-0005,CPA-2019-000 ,CPA-2019-0007,CPA-20 L 9-000g. ar....1 CPA-2019-0010 the interactio:-. maps; nnd no .1r.acie.by CPA-2019L 0007) have bc..ctilimi.12... CPA-2019-0010 Thc Man Ir.C7111::1C.:; pritt,',AS tCt Stipp:A-1 the 20-year fbruvds: L.: Plan. Add iiiona:1:,!. tl:e City 11,--t!..; conducted a number of si ii dint identify traiispotIalicri projects. The propo!...orl 1LJ.ndIierii I hi. vdrio;p:r. pi.....r.c•L hilt,one mastai find • !:L-A.v mask., not include al .,i. Ly in a pkin or study_ Afr'i ,•! Chapter 17.8l!, Permit Processing Pruedures..The following table 1011 is PNVCCSS Lgate Dock,::1 13 201L in ii ii 8 I H I I iii tiii -15,2019 (II flu I I I Lc 01. knew to Adi.-.7511 PubjShc:d IC1ce of 1)c.1):.i.....; i -v 2,10 9 B. FINDINGS AND SPECIFIC: 10SLPA Firalings: l'ord_...cint to Tine 71 (FrivironrIciltril SVNIC, the lead 1h:A probalfle i.,,(Iver-s-c impact 01) the. (,nvironment. , Ii 17.:11;11I_ Slaie:1-Jelli (1'11S) IiCt ic&1jind IO: tliC7 UndelRCN • 7:2 I( ). Ii 11': ii I.IIL tv ;.11(11 PUblie Work. )nt urintIit AWL; Inlkterniihairon i 1\1c2,11-Signficidn,2.L. kiyon review of Elit: c:orni:le[cc.1 environinontal CIIUJLIIS1, Tiles "IR,. 21, and 22 .cy comments, and c-41 lei m—rniali:.•11 .:-.11 i l loc the proposal Conelusion(s): The procech./.-4d Ppficy Act (S. FA) qnd7de21 SVA/Chow been fulfilled for each 1-,r9-oposa1. C. FINDINGS AND CONC I..i."Si.ONS Syq.:(:I VIC TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS 1. Compliance with Title 17(General Provisions)of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code a. Findings: SVMC 17.80.140(11), Comprehensive Plan Amendment Approval Criteria L The City may aum-09,-.4! Phri amendments and area-wide zum: map amendments if it liT3y. that: (1) The proposed bonrs I all'illf-E-111[1cr the public health, safl7tv_vvcd flii and protentio•I ,.-71)V11-011n)C.1)1.; Analysis: 77?(' Stan? Plan 1 ri? ' 01'4 e, Orri;e7riPM?12/,', L-Md L ;P:c • .t Co,...-11;1.),, • 0, 'i .-.)plAsT +111,..i;' !.'Cr.,131)0.0 pc) Itr(Jn.I5– 01; c )A-2019-0005,CPA-2019-0006,CFA-2019-0007,CPA-201 9-0008, and CPA-2019,-0010 201 9 proprls.rq !ex,' amembnevits will nslere that i9k:71.?6,1 plans ..!.:d ori curt • c iSisn 1:4C piiiPLIC (V.I.r,„'!V;(y, I ?nj prAieet1017 of the the Co re,0,-7div8 poi* (2) The proposedanu-...ridreent is CORSI stent ..0th the requirements of Chno....r. 36.70A RCWand with the portion adopi.d p Ia Lc I. atfecd1J:v antendipor_d:: Aoroiy..„As: 1,rn , AI* ;1'; ,PAC e.".15q:ir CZ he use coniiP:e.!ny re vccIIzmi &a/nation ,A!,),.the ne. The pr , hq.• Ac-• C;:_qrpre Ire 1I ' CTvt. OP! (:/,:P /IPi p 1, C If 't Or 36.VOA RCW(6io .ii Y. Ac) cmi a no/ the Aran itself (3) 1h 7[7.00: in a .heiiy owner's control applicable to iI. a within hid 1.1'.0 Analysis: The proposed amendment's are not privately butiated site-specific requests. The criteria does not appiy. (4) TIIL. !PI-C1)11' Ll I amendment corrects an obvious mapping error; or Acalvs6: f.+Co includ, .:n1:..,..:-(1.)?ent.! to Figures 26 fliVi , ' 'se cmcndments /pa-. r, re 4-7 , !r'iOrKC(!(.1,c !raw/ . appctidr.:. ri)nericirw2nt.. • an identified deficiency in the Compr,4-1)Elisive AmigH,Kr: The Cirr is adding on appenthr of maps to increase accessibility and aid in the ; p ; ; 12 S remove co+Apleted LT and 'rS r ;• 02: r !1:171(7.‘ PO/ OPNI'lfied ' fCrenCY Comp, ii. Tin City mum also consider the iiiitoviL.g CountweTiensive Plan amendments: (1) The effect upon the physical environment; Anally*: Thr effrct of/he proposed runenchnents helve on the:phy.vi:...h.1 have been are prrinok.,,,.!..: ?rt. rwielih.,...f (phi Ivin-project (hoir hc11AL: effi:Cif (.1 iIi J. PL ! )P':hII,l1D!. (2) Theeffec! ,o, MO:1041s: ore' prienarify p)'icy oriented and nor-project cunencemoi6 and do• :./1.1L1 on open si...c.we,streginS, rivers, and lakes. Staff Report CPA-2019-0004, CPA-20I9-0005,,CPA-20194)006,CPA-2019-0007,CPA-2019-0008, and CPA-21)19-0010 (3) The compatibility with and impact on adjacent 1 ,!1,1 surrounding neighturu:nds: AnalrAN: 7 he' rP(';„,-)(v...,..YYT 11 and no pro jr.t.1 rin1PM.1');E!!IIV ,.);(1 ,Ph• ci I .V Thiif)h'liAg (j1 (ArlY/.1,1.V.:fc-PJ. '"07,•'; VidnIeS fc," j•!, !., !TiL nrhi:" Ii if d.S7C( 11.-ii.:' A7;,,e,?, Nicc+if (4) 'rho p,doquacy of .e.r.vi )ii community facilir ilv.:1!.ir1inf transporLation, parks, rectttation, and sohocas; Alis: Cii lifies Policy Cf-P6 recomilY'.07d., ri for Ii( ' and -vice 1.!,••pc?' LOS stano(ohi:-.• adopted").- wo.ro•i, selver, !ran sportaii IF {!)?lorc.2irfent, ) II k. street cleaiing eirT,Nr ei; Yt.hr%!1. YI(^ n 1 ROI hicicus cy; SOr "r. i: l'i.,UNed 10 be ckh'qualc p.id.upn:f Corivrehoe Plan. (5) TI-,c f. IL. up... (.:ity, and region; 1,?",:,,..( ed r. Jiiiov,r)I Id v /j ' ;Joicy , j,,th- thipl ;;Ir pqCOY 11.1)/, ick"? ip to tho paMic as (6) 11•,.. ..iikinH1,.." .r.c. Iv 1!:..::0 or IL.- :I..nsity and the dor land Cur AwInlvsis: ;Tr:posed omeir.../i.ricidA •::1Q charigc the location or quan,ity /and uses tviiirr.,7 the C10•1•. tho inc ary consHien; •,12,;1,ii the adopt ,/con plan ON' oreca,;(,.r_ (7) The current and projected population densly ii. 111c: arca! aild AiLaFysis: I; t,:•7 are wed and non-projecl ;:o ri, 1i(4 u err- 1 cL,ISIly. (8) The of the Comprehensive Plan, Ali.,.1-1-!.:Nn!,:,7 714• proposed anrendp7ents have been evaIunied io consistency with the adopted Com./ in '..V1711 W,;e Wili; mpo.:1:Is of the plan C01101rShAl(S): For the yen, ph, c -ni C011SiStew with 7.80.140(11), D. FPiNCS AND CONCiAlSO VIIS SPECifir TO PUBLIC COMMENTS IF511.1.-..g.s: fl:"/kJ.) no receivecipublic COP?Me1215 lolace for Inc amo7dinents analyzed in this sire-report Staff Report _ CPA-2019-0004,CPA-2019-0005,CPA-2019-0006,CPA-2019-01007,CPA-20194005.and CPA-2019-0010 2. (::0 rid osion(s): ',\Tolicc of Public lIcaring (NOP11J1 was published an February g, and IS, 2019. No comments °lave 1-x,...r.:,11 cci....cived to die K LIN D];.Niti-'S ANIP 01.04,'ClA:SIC)NS SP1c,C11115.::ft)A(..:l.:NCY COMMENTS 1. Ifinilirws: 1) ,Lic. ...„',I/I.-cc,,i,lied agency coinments fron2 the agey?ce.c: .1.,e,,,Vei 6c101.1,c No con„......erris were nod 9!ii com..Wenli.i.ig agencies. Aiiericv Received Comments Continents Dated ..... (...ity k-;: Sricikalh....: \;;I ,..-.:,' SLr?.H. VI.k1(1.1(:nip H 1:.%:': Yes January 17, 2019 .. _ . . ..„ cfl.,..,.. D:Spol,-..;Hu .,/=.114:-, [:It.:kr)17.11],...:21: 1.711,,fl:r::•.:E,', CilV CI i Siabh.Hic V;ik..... IL...11,!I P. ..': PliIIIIIII V31.1 Pad ....:. ....:. ration s7,4)1,..an,..... V.1.11ey FireDDpartnnesiL Yes January 9,2019 Cif.vz..)1 Mill‘vond _ Ciiv ol 1,iberi...-' 1.4akB . City of Spril.:nic:! Cit v or Sp44,L-irie. ‘47,.....114.-y. Police f'.;.:.:1:-.1111,14i ., si)c.ka71,:.7.•County.% Buildirvi, ..11-.I I''..1[;,nill!._ !:74-4K.,,,LiEle(7i:imity, 1411,4firurnii.:.1c:1! ;;...e Vi..,..:.S. SpOka[le(.4)1.1nry., CICArl '''' :4,`,- ':!1:17y :4.:dn.'...:Courity, 16c 1.) ii .. \--I. 1 1"in„. 1„.),....irik.: s\-h.. 8 . . 1 - !.,.:,1,,‘„ ( :.; ;III:. t4[7:. i, rh'._ ;1,7141 District ‘,...:1k:,,,1oil: '. m] A;r Azenoy ____ I..IL--all BC1:11.1.1 ...WIICikhrl,....' ;',ICH. A li11.01.1ty_(STA) ▪ lilk;H.;,.: R.,.'..:,;,11i1: VI-111,[mr'.-ation Cnunc,il (53k.TC) ..,,y.:1.... i!,.;,[;,.]Fi (:1;.i. 1)..J]1 .oC: Iiiriicrce ▪ ocr, c...1-.:11.. 1.4.i a l'Ecc)lory(01ympia) I iii:,1:,H1 Stale, 1-hp1illFc.okrp:!.., ( 1.1n] aro) .....\'..... 1:]rftir.:11] Sr lie Doiii 01 Vis) ik. Viiildlife ...... .._ v....'.:;.Iii! 41.,..,21 .-aA. .1)4_11! iir Nk:I'Ll.441 kos,.......LE-ces '0..%."!...4111]k.,.1.41•4 :-,i iic I 'up,. .i I.;anspirridion . v/:!..,I,1ii-..71i . .Lk PA,,- --, A j.?--..cre.:ii! 1.11 Con-yr ic:.431011 ......._ .._ — V..!..'... AI cild...i....1 ):IL;I: L",:'. i!kLi:( l'o',....k.: ,..1..... 1.L.,111. ::. V.,:d:CI ( ''Piriparly I, k r.rt; ..! V:111.',... .'-;,....ii:,.11 l';':.:lrict P#36 . . I :.1-.: V;.:1,..A., ..::....I ii F ',.' rIL I 4361. . _ I ',.......%•,-.1 1c::•01 .1../ 1.1ct#363 ( .k•[-,-,k ;;N. _. _ _ yk".01'..11!:'',Coi,:il !fr,; 1!,!;'....il 1)111-11 : 2:H.:, Lizi, 6,pk;i'.., V':d!el" DiSIII ILI ii I L ...._.. .„ , . . .. ._ . Staff Report CPA-2019-0004,CPA-2019-0005,CPA-2019-0006, CPA-2019-0007,CPA-2019-0008,and CPA-2019-0010 Vera Water&Power Spokane County Water District#3 Spokane Tribe of Indians 2. Coneltisinn(s): No eancerns are gated far the amendments, Exhibit 1 Environmental C eckUikt �j`I��t�,� #� COMMUNITY& PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT P1.:4NNINC DIVISION 460,ValiCY. REQUEST FOR COMMENTS - ROUTING MEMORANDUM ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW DATE: January 3,2019 TO: J:ne cst,cd. Parties, City Departments, and Agencies with jurisdiction FROM: Colin Quinn-Tlur,st,Transporiat:oi ''liirliler 10.:.10 Shle'ii.;l-il• AvC7II1lC Spt11•:<:I= ',zl IIL:y, WA 9920(' P1-i.. 509.72C...5373 E-MAIL: eq::urst(aspolranevalley.or SUBJECT: CPA-21119-000,1, CPA-2019-0005, :i'A-2 )18-0006, CPA-2019-0O07,CPA-2019- 0008, sndl CPA-2019-0010 f'i' T tll.i i, t� i (iiivr-ellea'isivx Pbm Amendments; SEPA Checklist for non-project actions <'.5':;iJobtlLel with the City's annual comprehensive plan amendment cycle, including the followitig six r'ropoi,:.l.t-,11r7prehensiveplan amendments: CPA-200-0004: Proposal to update implementation strategies and timelines, removing completed strategies and adding strategies consistent with city goals and policies. CP \ 7t:'_i>1.t:o(i' Proposal to updili ' :x ilcsiI in11 1rlt] i[.}c:lc components of the Transportation Element and related gtl}Yl` and pohei .s, I I1 IY 1[t l ll!' policy:i port I r,r coils it r tt lnrl of a Complete Streets ordinance. cp,",_2019-oar,: PrinosP,Iio ltrul acid i;iiriI Ration Foals and policies. CPA-20 9 (JJ007: updar.e: li;adcsiri in and biLycic network maps to reflect completed projects and L'1�11 tinciii IU}(Ih 171'0poS.:CI pe Cti[rian and l:iieycl( [1Vtl'r'CIYaS- CPA-.:'ti I i.}..I Ii) )fi: Proposal to rn I i n ;ipp : dix with printable maps for the purposes of official record-keeping and to improv' wi nuUnity acc:(74 t i 1'::I i'.:d ii:mi"d copies of maps. CPA-2019-0010: Proposal to odd an apt,cio r: I i.,tinix planrie:I tl•ansporuotion p meets over a twenty-year horizon. Please review the attached l: .' t.)lk•etdis'i and submit written contingents via mail, facsimile,mail or ill pe : o ,111111. 1•7, 2019 at :( l p.m. to the ' attention of the Staff pec :Aunt iv ::lhove. The City of Spokane Valley is the lead SEPA agency for the envit-onnleIite r view of the above referenced project, If addi!iona[ information is required or iic-c.cicii fr or your dupe rtruent or :II'.Q IL']' to comment i. L'FY c contact Division.. If no coiil'vilnt!, are. givm by the date iiidi aced above, it k assumed J 1}I 1 .41ic:�,;iitr,e.cniic.Sp>'riiaiie ':yllti}',S5':►•9)20.6•i.5101710-5C1°Feat(549)72D-So75 COMMUNITY& PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MANNING NING DIVISION that there are no comments relative to the environmental review, The determination will he based on the existing information, 111201 I.So-quo Avenue•SptLsa ne Valley,WA•9920,6•(509)-26-500-0-Fox(509)7211-5U75 SEPA CHECKLIST Spokane *SVPr1C 2120 Milky 10210 E Sprague Avenue # Spokane Valley W . Phone: (509)720-5240 + Fax! (509)720-5075 # perailitcontergsoLasevaL,..„.or " • ONLY fl. Slamljttutl: Jacithiry 3, 2019 Received by: Fee: PLUS 4:. File -1,i; CPA-2019-0004; C3A-201P--iltIO : CPA- 2019-00013. Cl'IA-.201. -0007: CF.4-20.1.9-00O : CPA-20'0-0010 PART :1 — REQUIRED MATERIAL I Ii CATION MILL N01 JL ACCI 1E'f.1 I'"7-1Hr RQLJIRD MA EKIALS- 1<e:, LILLY C0jiWP.I.7C(i SFRA clivuktist 1. I Appif.:: tico Li Hoduced Site Plan of pro .,-.11 in 131/2" by 11" or 11" by 17"size El Trip Distribution and Generation Letter, if requested by Development Engineering. nWPoSZ OF CHEM.1511 Shite 17-nvir0rri1ei1t]I Policy Act rr:SI'fik.) chapter 43.21C ROW, reqie ilI ci0 tir:(..ntal agencies to cunsidur 11-1,1., environmental impacts of a Droriosal before making decisions_ Ar impact (LIS) Tust be prepared for all ptonosals with or:A:able significan!adverse r,:!! 1.7:, cliality of the nvTorniert. purpose ut this cric.-,c11:st is to yovick ilto!in:.,.ition to Irrjp u I 1.o icieqtlfy invcts Iiti yL-Jui roposal (ane to -ciltrue orLvoicl rnp-Lcts. rwm the proposal, it i ccic I1 Ihe orci cy Jc.:,c.iciekkilletier an HS is required. c. • , Ili ellViP:innicnk.711 -isks you to surriC ififL:.rrnation ab Jj-. you' LISC: this c heck:isl to detui iii ii vvIK•ther tlik! imp-icis of yoiii ]•Ircir...;-.2aV are i ji11. -equiriri!A F.ireparE.;110:1 21- Ans.,p_ror V:- questions brief"v. vothi tie must precise infilrmation know:- tile.best rieserbtion you must each questior aCrAi7.-itely an tc the hest o you' kno92-1c.c.ige, mcst CHSOS, you should 13c.: ii :ii,ff:rsi.lonS from your owi obsu[v;-.11Pns or pi i)?,:..41 plans Wthc Lit the need to hire experts-. if know tho answer o II a quest ori -r.l..Dn.F; not apply In your proposal, wi to do not know" or ' _ Or1ri oio nns...Yers to the gric!..-;:ioul: now rciu.y iViid urine.c .s.sary delays :-.r1 Lind-n:71-k de7:sic1witiorl$, Answer ','AIEIStiOM: If you eau you hoviL, vs, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checl.•(,11:,,I gircistiun .,::.iphiy to al: parts of your proneF.-y:-..1 ,.Jveri if you plan to do them over a period of lime oi on difileren: parcek of and P•11..:J21) nw aclditioriul thnt 1p/iF hilo describe yoJt proposal or its erivron:rion:01 cileds. he agen:.7.,v tc whori yol I subrull you to explain .5.ou, nswei s c:pr prLy.p.Licabditional information reasonably 'ri-hted to deterrnininj r- : . in r 1.7 . • COM plkAC,01 is r.111T.Lkii : 'OF non-project. proposls, even though cueslinns rn2.,,r be aosoiered'does not apply! IN A[ :ITIUN, corffete :.E;t1P1,11,1LNIAL SHEET FOR NON-PROJEC'i AC I ICS(Fart PL-22 V1.0 Page 1 of till a SEPA CHECItLIST 4000%HEY For non-project actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project." "applicant,"and "property or site" should be read as"proposal,""proposer," and "affected geographic area " respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: City-initiated Comprehensive Plan Amendments (CPA) 2_ Name of applicant: City of Spokane Valley 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Colin Quinn-Hurst, Senior Transportation Planner, City of Spokane Valley Community & Public Works Department; 10210 East Sprague Avenue, Spokane Valley,WA 99208 4. Date checklist prepared: December 26, 2019 5. Agency requesting cL,eckiist, City of Sppoiiario :alley 6. Proposed timing or schec:L,l.9 (including phasing, if applir.aL::;.+): n cipafe'? May/June of 2019. 7, Do you have any plans for future additions, expnnsicn, or si riiicr activity related to or connected with this proposal? Yes, If yes, exl,lain. This proposal identifies anticipated projects that will be developed in detail at a ft L!ro dolt',-. These projects will come forward iriiividualiy in future SEPA checklists. 's. Last any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be L:repared, directly related to this proposal. An Environmental Impact Statement(EIS)was ,:.rurnpleted for the City's must recent Comprehensive Plan update, titled 2017-2037 Comprehensive Plan Final Environmental Impact 5L,L9sn ent(FEIS) and supporting 2vetopment Regulations. 9 Do yc+i know .',rhethrr applications are pend nq for ooverrimer>li:al approvals of other proposals direnLI; ,'.i::r:.tiriq the property covered. by your p•uposr If yes, explain. Not applicable. 10. List any grave r7iim-I'; il,l7r .. 71t. r r I>'IIi Ii`, th -t 'b��lli Lc neeued for your proposal, it known. Legislative i7) ircwval by ti:ity C. moil PL-22 V1.0 Page 2 of S4'1141(arie SEPA CHECKLIST 4000 ValleY 1. Give brief, ccmplct€: de cr ptiori el yar proposal incliidirhq the proposed uses and The size of the project and site. There are si :vcral qucsticno Io -i it this checklist that as you to ccscribe certain aspects of your p'oposal. You d:) not need to Iepca: these an5weis on thli: pope. (Lead agencies may modify tiiis tom) include q- :•cific information on project description.) These are non-project actions associated with the City's annual comprehensive plan amendment cycle, ni o inerude six proposed amendments: CPA-2019-0004: Proposal to update implementation strategies and timelines, removing completed strategies and adding strategies consistent with city goals amid policies. CPA-2019-0005 Proposal #o update pedestrian and bicycle components of the Transportation Element and related goals and policies, including policy support for consideration of a Complete Streets ordinance. CPA-2019-0006;: Proposal to update and add annexation goals and policies. CPA-2019-0007: Proposal to upzioatc. peck:strinn L,:i: t :ictwork maps to reflect completed projects and adjustments to 11,2 pro lhw ti_'C ') 'Cl7.4it7i?,fi And bk yCle networks. CPA-2019-0008: Proposal to add an a2:e1•11d, i h p:rrtabrc maps for the purposes of official record-keeping and to improve corIv•:cimnity access to printed hard copies of maps. CPA-2019-0010: Proposal to add an ap E ii Uix listing planned transportation projects over a twenty-year horizon. PL-22 V1.0 Page 3 of QUIYokail0.11ce\1111.1% SEPA CHECKLIST 41000Val 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, towr:h p ar d range, if known_ If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the r_nc.e or boundaries of the sites). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinAyr neap, ono t000grapliic map. if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agericy, you are not required :o duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The proposed amendments are non-project actions. Projects that might result in impacts were analyzed in the 2017-2037 Comprehensive Plan Final Environmental Impact Statement(FEIS) and supporting Development Regulations, 13. Does the proposed action lie within the Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA)? Not applicable. The general Sewer Service Area? Not applicable. Priority Sewer Service Area? Not applicable. (See: Spokane County's ASA Overlay zone Atlas for boundaries). I, �_i5.. ~ 11l.t.Jr�l o l�r�l•6_t..�.rl� .] t��}�� r 1,: A!tl.. r:r.rir::P.rl Aquifer Recharge Area (CARA) I Aquifer Sensitive Area (AF-A)_ i. 1:;; .,..rite^ any systems, other than those designed for the dLt r. A k r tr; iris:ailed for the purpose of discharging fluids below tliu }ro ii.i 'ir7 lfrcf s :;yEtems such as those for the disposal .c.f >t_ rmwater or drair,r;ge it um floor drains). Describe the type of system, th,: ...r,.{:u P material to be .:., ..poscc of through the system and the types of rnatruriJ ilkol,r to be disposed of (including rnaterlals which may enter the system inad v:rverr11y through spills ru: a result of firefighting activities). Not apx icabte. 2. Will rar,r :F 4:niicr1 {cr7.1:�7!7.io1! organic solvents or petroleum fuels) be stored in above::ourxl 0 urr:_ierniniiu..d storage tanks? If so, what types and qua Mit rel ri.Ar::iai will be stored? Not aprp'.ico.; :o.. 3, What protective riias..ros will be taken to insure that leaks or spills of any chemicals stored or Lied on site will not be allowed to percolate to groundwater? Thiu iris lodes measures to keep chemicals out of disposal systems. Not applicable. 4. Will any chemicals be stored, handled or used on the site in a location where a spill or leak will drain to surface or grcur',rlwater or to a Storm-water disposal system discharging to surficu or groundwater? Not applicable. r ; Vi.i1 Page 4 of 4"„o e SEPA CHECKLIST doos*Vallhrley.. b. Storrnwater 1. What are the clepir1_ , I'I ffi l_. ':' fa! .`lil i. . I r' + h..ndicY;I ;It kr90\vr)? Not applicable. 2. W II stc.ri,1vK:;t !! .}0 ::FF.+::i,.-lr: edl into the ground? If so, describe any potential !•lip=1i,:i:-;. Not iDiviitohic. B. ENV1RONIVIENTALELEMENTS EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY 1 ) Earth a. General description of the s:tc (cl-erx arc)! flat,[ rolling. ❑hilly, ❑ steep slopes. ❑ mount loLs othe. Varies citywide. This proposal consists of policy-level changes and citywide network recommendations,. Characteristics of indiv'ithial sites will be addressed at the time of project development. b. What the steepest slope on the site (approximate percentslope)? Not applicable. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gr=avel, pe=at, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, ir,r Mem and note any mime farmland. Not applicable. Are tl! rr: surface indications cr history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity'? Not applicable. If so, descnbc. [ esc b, the purpose, type and appro iivate quantities of any filling or r,r ;riin I proposed, Also inaicatc: :,ou ce of fill. Not applicable. i:. Cul iic c^.r 'son occur as a result of clearing, c:onstruoticn, or use? Not I)piis.: 1's:,le. If r, generally describe, About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Not applicable. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Not a.pplieable ��f, n Page of "tl kane SEPA CHECKLIST Val.ley 2) Air rOR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e.. EVALUATION dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and AGENCY USE ONLY when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known_ Not applicable. ID_ Are there any off-site sources of emissions or CCC! 1h t ni a:yFr1ic(1 your proposal? Not applicable. if so, generally describe. c. Proposed measures to redLrce or control emissions or othc.i i2ir:-a .ts to air, it any: Not applicable. 3) Water a, Surface: 1) Is there any surface Watcr ood 1 on or in the irrrnediate vicinity of the site (including year-round rico seasonal strum-ns, saaltwDter, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? it }os, desuibe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it f ows into. Not app'i-z:7C 9e. 2) Will the project require any .u'jork over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described watcr-r' It yes, please cicscribE and attach available plans, Not appl'acable. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surfar.E, water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. IncicAte the source of pill material. Not applicable. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Not applicable, Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. PL-22 V1,0 Page 6 of u„Q0.0"N, SEA CHECKLIST Vaasa 5) Does the Proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site p ui G. Not applicable. 6) Does the.: L:r poral involve any discharges of waste rnater .ds to surface 1.6rat..- �r? Not applicable. If so, describe the typc of +p.,astc uiwi _rticip:,�,t cl v0lr.mC of discharge. be Ground: 1) NH ground water be withdrawn, or MI water be riischarged to ground water? Not applicable. Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. 2) Describe waste material that dischamed ;oto the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if ;7;1v (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the foll;y,4,ing chcmioa .53; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the syslerr., the [lumbar of such systems, the number cf houses to be .r;E:srvea (if applicable, cr toe r1iiniber of animals or humans the 3votem(s) are expected to serve. Not applicable. c. Water runoff(including stormwater): 1) Describethe z,ocrce of rtrtofl (ir;c 9i! :t •k, an,.! led of co'Ieciinn to l :1 ;:'.J:i'.:i . If ;uiy (inclil:; _: quantities, it L:I'I.'F1 ;r!! Wiiere will this +raer flow? Not .,pplic;able, VFill this tv tt"r ik)w into other waters? Not applicable. If so, desctiuu. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? Not applicable. If so, generally describe. d. Proposed !neciE;_.IIes to rcdiIce or control surface, ground, and runoff water iriip;„7,:ts:, ifoy Not applicable. AGENCY USE ONLY OI 7q U1 Pagel of ❑]1 ik 0renSEPA CHECKLIST EVALUATION FOR 4) Plants AGENCY USE ONLY a. Check or circle typos of vegetat on found on the site: ❑ deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other ❑ evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other • shrubs ❑ grass ❑ pasture ❑ crop or grain ❑ wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulirush,, skunk cabbage, other ❑ water plants: water lily, eelgrass, rnilfoil, other ❑ other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation,}.gill be removed orattered' Not applicable. c, List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Not applicable. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, it any: Not applicable. 5) Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have beer- observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: ❑ birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: ❑ mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other ❑ fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: b List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Not applicable. c. Is the site part of amigration route? Not applicable. If so, explain, d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: Not applicable. PL-22 V1.0 Page 8 of _ -ley EVALUATION FOR AGENCY UsL ONLY 6). Energy and natural resources a 'iNhat kinds of envresy (electric, natur=al gas. roil, At-00d 1c.ve, soEa`) 1:.)c '_sort to meet the :::orr p16:fed =ymje€Y- energy nc,;!s? Describe .,,,fhllrer it be .used tor I it a1irnq. rr a,nutactur r}g, e:fc- Not applicable. b Would your project affect the pcten'iul use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, gen._ra>Ili c.i_r,cribc. Not applicable. 'hhat kinds of cnorny conser- aVon fcatives are included in the plans of this Frroposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy ir•.t,acts, if any: Not applicable. 7) Environmental health a Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic ohemicnf,, risk of fire and explosion. spall, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? Not applicable. If so, describe: 11 Describe special emergency services that might be required. Not .rl plicable. 2) proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: Not applicab;o. b. Noise 1) 1 Thal types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project ( cr example: raffle, Et.ui )m-vent, operation, other)? Not applicable. 21 Wt-rat types and levels of noise would be (Te ted by or i.asc.7ciated with thr project on a short-term or a long-term boas (for example: traffics Y•onsirrrctron, operation, other)? Indicate what hours. noise would coirr; from the site. Not applicable. 3) I'rnposco r leaSurr-�; 10 reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Not applicable. PL-22 V1.0 Page 9 of rt'ip S}-.PA CHECKLIST ne 4.000Val.l . EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY 8). Land and shoreline use a What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Not applicable. b_ Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe Not applicable. c_ Describe any structures on the site. Not applicable. d. Will any structures be demolished? Not applicable. If so, oihat? e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Not applicable. f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Not applicable. g. if applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Not applicable. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? Not applicable. If so, specify. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the con-ipleted project? Not applicable. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? Not applicable. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: Not applicable. I. Proposed measures ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: Not applicable. PL-22 V1.0 Page 10 of iiorle ' EPA40.000 c1tr ~ i.�s l Mil.Xe EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY 9) Housing a. ,Approxim „teiv ho. marry (roils wc)Li d bc: yovided, it any? indicate whether hicih, riddle, or iow.l,cora € 110Lisi~:4;. Not applicable_ b. Approximately how many units, if any, vk'ould] be el.mate(P ladicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Not{applicable. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any Not applicable. 10). Aesthetics a What is the tallest height of any prop:: ed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior 1;41iIdin n-iaterial(s) reposed? Not applicable. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Not applicable, c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impact , if any: Not applicable. I 1 ,. Light and glare (1 gf.3r': ;rill iil: rJi.;tirp, I r)-(:)duce?kWhat time of day ,�'J 1ir iii..' ri Er1�I IP I;y C..!( IC!' Not appJicaNe. b. Could light or ,;;fare t ii ir,,: li i;:i ;::c; piciject be a safety hazard or interfere with, Not c,sp,.}14:z31318. C. What existing off-site sources 0 Ciyl,i: or glare may affect your proposal? Not applicable. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Not applicable- . 71 -2..2V1.0 Page 10 of 14 sookine SE PA CHECKLIST EVALUATION FOR AGENCY 115E ONLY 12) Recreation a What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Not applicable. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? if so, describe. Not applicable c. Proposed measures to reduce or corka! in pa s an recro.at:pn, ,rlcluciing recreatiuri opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: Not applies ble. 13). Historic and cultural preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or prni)DE:ori for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, (jc-:n r.I y describe. The proposal contains citywide project recommendation. Places or objects l'.sted on, or proposed for, national, state or local preservation registers will be idonti1ic d n.LL the time of project development. b, Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. Not applicable. G. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: Not applicable. 14). Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed :icces to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any Not applicable. b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If :'ot, who( upproximatc d;sian,e to the nearest transit stop? Not applicable. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? Not applicable. PL-22 V1.0 Page 1 1 of Kn3P SEPA CHECKLIST d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, nol including driveways? Not applicable. If so, -rr:r..,rully+ describe (indicate rn+hether public or private). EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY e I;'iiII the project !.isn iir' r)07.1.2r in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air I� orr.:I:u:Wr::'`' Not applicable. If so, generally describe. f p.„r,, ;7 r,r,y vet icular trips pc:r rid!,,, would h generated by the completed project? Not applicable. it l r�r'^�rr', rrid cafe when peak volumes would occur. to reduce ar control transportation impacts, if any: Not applicable, 15) Public services a, Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fir; pi^tectinn, police protection, health care, schools, other)? Not applicable_ If so, generally describe. b. Proposed measures to roduco or control ,direct impacts on public rG ices, if any. Not applicable. 6) Utilahies a. Check utilit currently available at the site: ❑ electricity, 11 natural [] refuse service, ❑ telephone, 11 sanitary sewer, ❑ E!pt c systorYi, U other- descrih . h. L}esc'i ib: the utilities that are prupo.:.$.ri for the project, the utility providing the .service, and the general col. activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might I:>> rrecci,i1 Not applicable. C. SIGNATURE The ahc'vc :iris rrerrs vire true and complete to the best of rny Kncwfedpe. I understand that the lead odericy relyirg ,Yr1 them to rrinkk.e its dersisicci. Signature: _ Date Submitted: _ PL-22 V .O Page 12 of npokan e SEM. CHECKLIST D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NON-PROJECT ACTIONS (Do not use this sheet for roiect actions Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the demerits of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or re',ease of toxic or hazardous substances; cr production of noise?The recommendations in this proposal may increase emissions to air, production of noise, and discharge to water through an increase in impervious surfaces and the generation of additional vehicle trips_ Any impacts will be reviewed and mitigated at the time of development based upon the regulations within the Spokane Valley Municipal Code. a Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: Proposed measures will address drainage and stomiwater design as well as multi-modal improvements. Measures will be developed in detail at tine time of project development. 2. Hew would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine Life? Impacts are unknown at this time and will vary according to project. Specific impacts will be identified at the time of project development based upon regulations within the Spokane Valley Municipal Code, a. Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: Proposed measures will be identified at the time of project development. 3. I.Iov..', would the, proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? impacts are unknown at 17i4 time and will vary according to project. Impacts will be identified at the time of individual nro •ecrt development based upon regulations within the Spokane Valley Municipal Code. a. Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: Proposed measures will be identified at the time of project development. 4, How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for govcrn°ir::ntdi protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic avers, threatened or endangered ,:l.. : ::ie , li,bitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? Impacts are arrik aro'vn .al this time and will vary according to project. Specific impacts will be identified at the i',dvidual project development based upon regulations within the Spokane Valley 8_ Proposed measures to protect rig.:€l resources or tc avoid or reduce impacts are: Proposed measures to protect or conserve such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts will be identified at the time of prcjeet deve!cpraicnt. Pt-22 V1.o Page 13 of njo1 .n SFPA CHECKLIST 5. How would the proposal be ie l_, i y i11.2":i and ;Fi rE.!ir,e Lisa, including whether 1 would allow or encauragr, Lind or sliorc•I rd,: with existing plans? Impacts are unknown and will vary according to project. Specific impacts will be identified at the time of project development based upon regulations within the Spokane Valley Municipal Code. a. Pi. posrYtf measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: Proposed measures will be identified at the time of project development. G. I low ^;;t:ft! Thr, proposal be !ikely to increase demands on transportaf'on or public services and '1I]r= proposal would improve tura€.i alter transportation facilities, impacting trnrasl)uraf;{'[i through additional trips and impacting the provision of public services and i filific°s tlarou€1h changes to route chv.racteristics• Any impacts will he reviewed and mitigated thL time of rievefopment based upon voqu! buns within the Spokane Valley Municipal Code. Proposed ii easrirr-,rs to reduce: car resp,,nrt tot reduce or respond to such demands. inclruc;c acivIrEss ilF ire rc:as co vohici i+'r=we through safety and multi-modal improvements. project-tovcl coordination with public service providers to supprxt public se.� ice rie Y s. 7 Identify, if possible.; vnether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or ric°r:. i Ic,'vs or roquirerv;certs for Lie r:.-c]tection of the environment. The proposal d€a .i. rot. with Kcal, state, or federal laws or requirements for tfR) protection of nt c•i1v; teii7:nL Any specific issues that r,say ;.fisc during the development of indi'vica•.ifat t c a3j{sa t vHri''1 1, i,-r 3:=ifsi t! he ci addressed bo.sect reiltrtatious within the S ,ukaric V:1ll•7tr Municipal Coa.ie, PL-22 V1.0 s,;,,,r ;a •.r swamSEPA CIIECK.L1ST 4000 ley oz. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, swear under perlalt.w+ of perjury thw 'the above responses are made truthfully and to the best of my knowledge. I also understand that, shchi ti.cro be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part, the :q•,:rl;:T.t rllt]y withdraw any Determination of Nonsignificance that it might issue in reliance upon ilius Date: Signature: Please print or type: Proponent: Colin Quinn-Hurst, Sr. Transportation Plari-icr Val11 .5u Cc�ri,i lri: iiy >i7d Public Works Department Address: 18210 East Sprague Avenue; Spokane Valley, WA 99206 Phone: (509) 720-5323 Person completing form (if different from proponent): Name: Address: Phone: PL-22111.0 Page 15 of Exhibit D\5 Determination Con1MuN PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMI!NT Seal ax BUILDING&PLANNING DIVISION LANNING DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE 10210 E Sprague Ave • Spokane Valley WA 99206 509.720.5240• Fax: 509.720.5075 •planning[a spokanevalley.org nIAT. NUMBER: CPA--2019-0004, CFA-2019-0005, CPA-2018-0006, CPA-2019-0007, CPA-2019-0008, and CPA-2019-0010 PI OPOSALDESCRIPTIOIY: City initiated amendments to tlic Compiehendve Plan inciuding: Update implementation strategies to remove r-olfr1?'rcied strategies,update timelines, awl add CPA-2019-0004: new strategies consistent with the goals and gaalicacs in t'.ic Comprehensive Plan. Update pedestrian and bicycle components of the'I.r:rrisp€artation Element. Bring Ian?,nn a I'onvartl CPA-2019-0005; to identifying Complete Streets as a best prrcrice CPA_2019-0006: Annexation goal and policy additions. CPA-2019-0007: recommendations.Figures 2C 27 and 46 to reflect amendments to pedestrian and bicycle Facility recommendat ions. CPA_2019-08: Create a new appendix of the most recently adopted maps. Create a new appendix of transportation projects for a 20-year period consolidating existing CPA-20t9-0010: stndi.es and plans. PROPOSAL LOCATION: Proposals appy citywide APPLICANT;City of Spokane Valley, 10210 E Spokane Valley„ WA 99206 OWNER: Various • LEAR AGENCY: City of Spokane Valley,Community& Public Works Department Pursuant to Tide 21 (Environmental Controls)ofthe Spokane Valley Municipal Code,the lead agency has determined that this proposal does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement(EIS) is notrequired under RCW 43.21 C,030(2){c). This decision was made alter review of a completed environmental checklist,the application,Spokane Valley Municipal Code Titles 19,21 and 22,site assessment,and comments Croat the public and affected agencies,This information is available to the public en request. DETERMINATION: This DNS is issued lender HVAC 197-11-340(2); the lend agency will not ad an this proposal for 14 days from the date below. Cornrnents rrrrrst be received by 4:00 p.m.on March 1,2919, STAFF CONTACT: Mike Basinger, Economic Development Manager, (509) 720-S33 I, mhasinger@spokanevalley.org RESPONSIBLEOFF1ClALr Mike Basinger, Economic Development Manager je DATE ISSUED: February 5. 2019 SIGNATURE: �,;, ,L AP?PFAL: An appeal oftbis determination shall be submitted to the Community& Public Works Department within fourteen (14)calendar days after the date issued. The appeal must be written and make specific factual objections to the City's threshold determination. Appeals shall be conducted in conformance with SVMC 17.90 Appeals,and any required fees pursuant to the City's adopted Fee Scheduled shall be paid at time of appeal submittal. Pursuant to WAC 197-I 1-680,appeals shall be limited to a review of a final threshold determination. City of Spokane Valley February 15,2019 Detertninationoft+Ion-Significance(DNS) Page I oft File No.CPA.2019-01IO2 Exhibit Notice of Public Hearing Notii...,e of Public Hearing Cruyo1Spok iii valley '1019 Comprehensive Han Amendments 6;00 $1 vaI iIiii; i L:1; ;ilk::: 12.7 (.1.ambers, 10210 E.Sprague Ave.,Spokane Valley, WA 99206 IL.aiiiiBody.! Spokane Homing Commission w ic receive public-,comment CIL F)roptriscd Ai-clench-TR-1-A l i he .-2,-or1nd [he punlic 111,, I u tll of the to!t.0.-t-int%appliciuions_ Fa: ING.; CPA-2019-10AI rk.A.i.iption of Coinpi.ch:t Plan A nici.Cment to change the land use,designation from Industrial (F',.to atint district Crorn (c.• Urb-.1..;(R-3) tion of Phil usI 62?North irL Road Sita ft Calionct: Kciniall,Plarmor(509)720-5026 KKeridallaispok.attevaLley.ork File No.; (.:PA•7019-1.11A2 n Amendment to change the land use elesignecion Dot SingleF:iinily k14C)and the associated zoning from Single Fan7ily 1,',eirkr.i in I [h..; Road !.-,10(1•( MPalaniupoknevallev.orti ').111.11.03 CornFehensive Amendrnerii to change the land use cksignatioii :1011) S rirl Family Rc.5ideigirai (M FR)ancl [lc zissociat-ed zoning from Single [airily idantiai II:' I I : J9. -6.nd 8821 East Sinto Avenue;and 1405 and 1407 North Marguerite Road :4)1p:!o-vi Hillier(509)720-5031 riv1Palaniuk( spokanevallev.orp .1:.°P.A.-1ii!9 ),'•Q..nitt 'i-,.itpreliensive Plan Amendment to change the land use designation from Multi Family Mixed Use (CMU)arid the associated zoning from Multifamily Residential (MER)to .oti);io! Frop(Jsal: 622 North Pack Road 1.!)ut art; ".."2C-5026, ICKo.ndaliQsmoliwovzvallcy.irr2 rih. No.-. I TA-2019-0404,0005, 0006, 0007,0008,and 00.10 • r'1a iii praposou Compft er.rdivi,. Him Amendments to Chapter 2 Cinals, Sirategis, and tri-rinToi.Lii ion.Tic arrmicliliont!-; also include.the additicm. new 0(ncl'upkAl rups, plarinc:d improvf.„Inents horr.,:mt. ain.:tric!mun'Is Hwy- rILLuc micor cliany,cs 0111,-1 elements l'urthei details of the Cji initiated amendments include: srilt!rietii.0 CPA .2,0 A9-0094; arld stratc.gics i....-•011 the th.7, 1:.:(tr1iprz.th11,sivc and bicycle components of the Transportal and related t°Pk-211 i I Being language 11rwit-J1 , ole .1,r,Jinance. 4.).;i1C1' '116 Lo LIALL•:_A. MAI ii liendments to pedestrian and CPA-2019-00tr7:: H: reixidornertilal.kim. CPA-2019.tio : C:roait a hew appi.:ttiti ri"tile, iiijsrt maps. ACream a r:irisporiaticin projects for a 20-yoar period that is CP -2019 intbrmod by existing sitichos acid plans. Ci(., siarf Development Manager; I KT.. 1),.ov6.opment Specialitt; Tr,-t....-isportation Planner pin rin;,,Tion: the ;LIktUpalL.-.. i'V11111.j Det.?catination of Non-si -nifieitnce(I)NS)on ateill oitc.7 Aci and chiapkr 21.20 SVMC. rAt-aring. IlrocedureS: :;1" r11K,H1, 1IL jii: 1 ill Iii ICC:11:111,1;:;.cri of t TH1E1 15r. El. 1 -.AI HE. II CCE11111U.117 Enid Elociirraents Pir I. IL 1;111v The. I'iErtrinp Ct1!11111-1Y-;101) will l'oro.arLI eo....r .HE!....1.1:1:E. 1 int • .. .-.;.rEok.a:i L Staff Ic1l11r 1Il nspectii-m of File: A d‘hiiii,h1,. L. sc.\ ;he heal liE . 111L! Si'clii';.c.pori and 1110 I: r II/I lvand 1ocaie-;.I .At V•011Ey 1:!11 II• pi .. !I hr.. u1;1,!:. ... SLAIE! ..-E•iI Iii. Ill I...1 C01-:11111[1.1r,r',,Irld Pkii: 1, \M.?"1.:„::. t,i ' !O.'I(1 i \•;LiA 1:111Eil i PHIY1 E h.;['Ill.: I 1;h', hcariurir, or oilicr I H .; Il ) FL; L1L'llIuL!11 LIiii arr.lrE,riu...ry, End:, hi_ irrEidc Carrie Kotirirlki, SpoirmwViI Ic )L1Ju1y (J...., (1 Vublisli: l'ebtuary 8,211 9 mid February 15. UI Exhibit 4 Agency Comments Acckt Pursuing Excellence ?r fit" CFM t J ' valx Brt Ax COLLINS, FIRE CilIEF FIRE MI/ _ ` 2120 N. .r Spokane Valley,WA 99206 (509)928-1700 Main January 9, 2019 (509)892-4125 Fax spokanevalleyfire.com City of Spokane Valley 102111 F Sprague Avenue Spo ane valley,WA 99206 RE: CIA-2019-0034 to CPA-20 9'0006; CPA-2019-0010 Technical Review Cu-merits The Spokane Valley Fire Department has oompieted the review for the above referenced project and has nc comments on the SERA checklist. If there are any questions please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, J ti ':.: v:1 31 l'IP'.. From: guluight To: LOA Quinn-Hurst Chad Rian5 Subject: RE: Request for CDrnrrients•CPA-2019-0001 to 00013 arid COD Date: Thursday, January 17,201.9.10,11.8:.12 AM Attachments: imaggsaj,122 iinpug.1,1.B.111q 9•1• 11•-•,- - - - •- v.4.17 From: Colin Quinn-Hurst Sent:Thursday,January 3, 2619 I:7, OD To: 'Central Vallev School g 'Centuryijokl. cl(aren...St(w!:,...7irrl:7)centufyli:1,; 'Cit is Johnston <crjohnston@spakanesheriff.org›; 'Chris Knu : ! mps..-7...-Aorip.courv!,%/.014;>; 'Christina Janssen ',City of Millwood' cpl.: Iii 'Cindy Anderson'<cyaricl:-.:(!-Dc'....y.,A,a.gov : 'City of Spokane Tirrell ‹tbiacl,: !•1.1okanu:-.1kv.Drg>; 'Co; n ep nor' <CL': 2'."-.4•10-1)spokarit.2.-.:(-)Jr.ty.org>., 'Comcast' "(onsolicl)ted Irrigaucr ...)istriLi 1119' ‹cci WaLer ()Aria 111' <Itct1 OFflCjt 'last Vali.• lioyl 1 .i. .1 ,ST7 •H,•vit.I 10@ev5d.o.r:i>; '1111A rd 8. Lir 1 <CL; •I iy ii LII.-; '1)-; 'Jacob Mc!Ca:!n' <JInCaeli:_:101:ncry,'...Y71.:10, ,: EV1 i <rrist•:-.. iLr i 'Y.-•IeV-(:1 Led • ci ',.61'.1Rr ,„wco. ‹BriarLPF,Jriode@F•AP.,-(SAWA .<rwright(c':' Aquifoi Rijard <iFft pokMie J if LT.oi Col.nty Planr:h ig •--.ipr,. ::1ErSC..r,PS;JOh-:riel-c:Linty.ort>., Cow-ty 43' net>, 'SpokzI u Regional Clean All CC.L jr di cr Heali.h fl :11!:;11 ker,inr!..all I -aris-,..brtation Council' Transit Authority' <kotterst-orLia)31.-..-_-..kmorrarF.it cern›; `Soukans'. Tribe of Indians'<nand...0 :anetribe.ccrn>; 'Traci F.,' r ire Dept No. 1' <Ha rveyle spokaneva II( i rc.com>: 'Vera Water & Pcvdel' ,S1.-'-'121-..71'.,VE-7.—i-...ipower,corri>; 'WA Commerce' <reviewteam@camnnerce.Na.gov); 'WA Dept of Arai and Hist Preservation' <Gretchen.Kaehler@DAHP.wa.gov>; ''kr••:' .. ' calag`yr. Olympia"<se:.,iunit@ecy.wa.RCla>. WA Fish & Wildlife" <SEFAdesk@dfw.Wa.00 >; `}fl I iJ"=:I F'4oi.ircPS'‹no' I arks.v�ra. C.tir'- ii° �., ; ' fFi .. fa@ r :rit l 5` :#. :i r.; 'Spokane 4'life+ Parks' <Chris.guidcttiC�P � ., �' 'i Fire Department'<Inspections@sF':; ;• s.ei ccwafstet@mewco.c0m5; 'Hutchlnsc irl "Lai rj.c.ostwul.:Pp66..com'r 'irvinwater@Windwireless.raet'; 'Ieslre.klrig[ If''..'. :. h'Irji:l Riggs<;:ri{.,;:,i spokanevalley.org>; Jenny Nickerson<jnickerson@spakarrevalleV:,.:rr ; rlow 'spokanevallay.org ; Mike Basinger<mbasinger spokanevalley.arg>; CI .1 i'.': :•.1: ,,.ji pokanevalley,org'; Michael Fraemming <mfrcemming@spokanevelley.org>, 'null ; '? .;1 i'i' "Orchartaeirriga_iondist6@acorncast.net'; 'timothy.morgantiv'sssd ;r ,'; 'rick@modirr.org 'info@rrradirr.c;rg'; ' Ley@libertylakewa.gow' Cc: Karen rendall<kkendall@spokanevelley.org> Subject:. Request for Comments -CPA-2D19-0004 to 0008 and 001D All, Please review the attached Environmental Checklist and associated mtriaIs for the following projects; CPA-2019-0004: Proposal to update implementation strategies and timelines, removing completed strategies and adding strateges consistent with city goals and policies. CPA-2019-0005 Proposal to update pedestrian are bicycle components of the Transportation Element and related goals and policies, including policy support for consideration of a Complete Streets ordinance. CPA-2019-0006: Proposal to update and add annexation goals and policies. CPA-2019-0007: Proposal to update pedestrian and bicycle network maps to reflect completed projects and adjustments to the proposed pedestrian and bicycle networks. CPA-2019-0008; Proposal to add an appendix with printable maps for the purposes of official record-keeping and to Improve community access to printed hard copies of maps. CPA•2OI9-0010: Proposal to add an appendix listing planned transportation projects over a twenty-year horizon. Please submit written comments to me via email, or mail, byJenuary 17, 2019 @ 5:00 p.m. My contact information is listed he low and noted on the attached documents. Please contact me at any time with any questions_ Thank you. Colin Quinn-Hurst,AV I Sr.Irartsportetion Manner 10210 E.Sprague Avenue J Spokane Valley,WA 99206 (509) 720-53231 Qablairlanallev.or Pxhibft CPA-2019-004 Draft amendments to Chapter implementaflon Strategies PRIMARY RELATED LEAD£x ' STRATEGYTIMING PRIORITY ELEMENT ELEMFNT(S1 PARTNERS 411rt,:rital(.: I rorr,n•el icras ve - 11.wa icIIJ1?aYrr} (.-S In,i.,:L nd • market ar.... idcr�Lil{ a SIu.i1i14 rconamic E.D,.Division; 2131 -_. I Valley LI..IT ::,II,:I,h o C,7 s inl'IA 1.11 i • E.D,. Spokane HIGH hf Development assets towc:-rltl•beres id Nil,„ employers,aro is visitors, Continue participation regional � E.D.Division; tourism-promotion efforts and • ValleyFest,Visit Increase the City's presence in Economic • • Spokane,Sports C+1$aing HIGH regionalevents.,__ _ _ Development Commission Eeol:�r _- ar Economic ■• i #� E.D.Division; 201S_ _ HIGH _ _ Development resat SL►raaq — ,4f patcs-tial tourism d Itnsat -.tI.. 1 - kitdw vGIS and web•based2-044 Economic • LD.Uiivision technologies tin a 5 s iSt business �eV�ItFiranr IIIGII devela proem. I r:vify :.rsctce r'Iai * -=�. Fr s Economic •• • E.D.Division; 4"- 9 .- Develvprnent Comultar7t MEDIUM PIJEL"fit"!ea-interest Ift t•ktC * -�'.^:•ricins: er-eat4oR•sof-a-14-si--les4 C-4=unaak a-.4em-6.e41,. Zfe.-144% 9 I,44Dn u +I r�rnc Devclapn nt T r E.D.Envision; forme ar-eta. • Econonic • # cgioniI H It 201.9 MEDIUM Development t7ictrict. • _._�,....... __-. ■�■• ■4 ■ ■4 �. ...._._,_ PRIMARY RELATED LEAD& TIMING PRIORITY ELEMENT ELEMENT(S) PARTNERS • Streamline permitting procedures Building based on FeedbackCJ+7So9'r,v Land Use HIGH from business and landowners, developers.etc. reducothcamour.t'J�"^^1::`r'L� 9 #�-1-.�,.l�.b.s-r, --`--�::r'• I. :c c.. ;�I., Lint? �.se `�, ..W_ per- Collaborate tivith the priva te sector i to facilitate the successfu{ Land Use • _ E.D.Division HIGH redevelopmentofMirabeau Point. Coordinate transportation planning rffortswith other jurisdictions to cnsurethat Spokane Valley Transportation * • - Cowing HIGH businesses and neighborhoods are adjacent well servedjurisdictions, STA • Work with STA •• // Iaan", flfl— cto provid a but shclt r r,t:.t.etzie Transportation "` MEDIUM for ;ion1 `!i i::i _ :STA ii„ion STRATEGYPRIMARY RELATED LEAD& ELEMENT ELEMENT(51 PARTNERS t'VINc! PRIORITY Seek opportunities to continue toWcrks r fund grade separations en Transportation r• • Chamber HICII Pines Road anti Barr P.oael of amerce, GSI E.D.Division; Identify low-andmoderate-income Spokane 2024 housing needs, Housing • r Housing LOW Authority r • Housing _. .. ED Division; Continue to evaluate neoi housing ,•* r Womet�uiIders 2024 LOW typologies to meet market needs. Housing Association _ r • E.D.Efi :�: C:'pit.! 411-6-4,-6-4-4..9-AI c-„:11%.: 1'.: 2017 1441.1 U pdate wayfinding and signage for the entire City,and incorporate a • E.D.Divisiion; 2'-`' cop ntaesthelcor theme Capital r• Downtown LOW based on the outcome of the City's Facilities Partnership branding process. _ €,c:cute a Capital r■■ : ____ MEDIUM E.D. 2020 MEDIUM J F. Facilities Division _ t • Parks; Improve new and existir gaccess Capital ,a•r r 13 Department of 2024 MFDiUM points to the Spokane River. Facilities Ecology n:::91:t;atEoil a 24,24 Capital • fi1EQIUM_ II• .• �- . Facilities PRIMARY RELATED LEAD& STF ATE:C,Y WING PRIORITY ELEMENT ELEMENT(S) PARTNERS p lan.rlcd Administration prio1{tic:7rlr-cor+ rctir:.a[^1 .,. _ aclit es ital �' � • • _ 202 MEI)IUN{ L.D. ,. Division,; Pul�lic:.n� r Spokane 2022 :4: : -to Private County_ H I GI I support industrial developmel7'_. • iii Di 4.4e i ;d1.4 bli� 7_922 Irriration�.:.a. r -4:I`.`'-y': -r: pojat,tutsii-jt1444.1 Fes } • --" • dja� ::"L�ftcss W op7ort._n t!cn A E-C7,Division. , Parks Open o Si * adjacent 21,74g3414._. Space besin€ssrs Seek funding _ - deveIopnarth-saLthtraiG • _ t connections between Parks acid Open , «4 r • Resource 202C• cr3�t west Space ! Conservation _ Office • €vac 61=r;:41a:i6'kity )! • _ - - t- "P371.1:11:1^ m414-7 SkaacV r^r � �€C?!!JM , _ 1. Exhibit 6 CPA-2019-0006 Draft amendments to Chapter 2 Goals and Policies LU-P19 4dentify . and assess .... _ t Spokane Valley. CF-P16 Plan and coordinate the location of public facilities and utilities in potential annexation areae Exhibit CPA-2019-0005 Draft amendments to Chapter 5 : Transportation CPA-2019-005 Proposed Amendments to Chapter 5: T'r n, i),..t:ati':iii Pg. 5-77: Pedestrian Facilities F\.-sirlr17r �rrl `fl:if'71sirlSoot-119aValley ':r„If, Fr( I.dl i I i .Ll':+. rlllt:l Ii,lii 71141111~ ':115::•1 •J=::rilklil.9:a'r 1.:.11:111,!...ill:: 1.15(5r coliriccti: with .1 :I:.'r I I r:. r�� .'•'ll 311'-1 "_•�li ,:I .:tl�._Ilti 117:],:iii ' i ijc L:a'*' .'_.f •. i•.I require Si?I'; l .l:..Ji:,rl :Un nitltn3-.n iiiS..+'.,Ilit;,, ,d..-..-."s Lil.., '.:IRI''• i:iiii::: rlr�•- 'IS dI: '�{�I-}�rlcl[r alp; •111 l:,"�" ii! "k:: f lu tkn•i 11,� 1 :L.a_:1I°',ll ,u�� r'�r�,-1tnt 1.1 . r:t '1 . ii'. 1`r 10 till: id: •�!r':.l;S', ::114•1 et:i:': Itr�trip off—,_ :3.1 Il r�L`911 C? it ri ';G4'-hr,{1;:111"" }''I,Itilll -;i11• IIS"I`'. ,`." '- I:.,IJ.'i''ni.,i: all li •;LCI,. an !l[l l :''itiIic,such as1:1i1 l: ;iI}ill il',•II-: 'i?i q8 1.1iS; ;iii Also •w•;:'. • El.: •'oritHl-i l•'I ti''•1't,°IIlt?'i°, I,:lrric it ll; ilii RFCF:1iil .till-:"1.S..1 fl+_ 11?lai��-� I: I-i IIF''.`25 sl1'-.1:4'=i)iii ,-}f Pg, arc I;r' .;nt LIr: both sides of :Ir....A prin;,nal attd Ininorarterials an Spokane Valley as well as some. ,7Krll!:-`i:r3.Thr] t...:1 hili. l.l'..r I.I'i•tlllJ..:�,I t:r::..ell nl,;.'.:idr '.-ll .l IIS %II riGhr7l'•I .,. I1 1"ili.::. I :i :' 1 {.?':1ltl{:Ils, r.n':1 II-.a,iLIici iIS. k":hll:.liE[ t i_}'lil:sell I . .Il:_'+',!'. _lip. 11 ':. ri.r Llllr_ si?l.:t-'ial:.;s for a . '-,1C. 11, I:siri: 11hc: ;.weptiY of coverage,such 'rF?i a'ilrnI !1 t`'4t]1!':, ?ff1 1 1'_. 111.1 Adams =1ddif I.,r ifl'.. 5!'I t 'a:=ll II T.."`i C1•-generally focus oil till :3r r'rra15. In ;1''III:Lli717 i(,tiltl'L 7'11:C:111111 r I'[itiy'w':Yll::' :il- rl' SII+: t,` t'i7e7:ti17 4r-1111,' Jr io 1):I.: pk:Y•'xl hl:;il •1 II`:a: tint'h5 for I r -.ii iirli” J91 i b cyC u.�r;- lily -_'�i Ei•.,ii ii i.il .ii a9-U.'-'iUC:S a,Jedi,_LisCw - �. v `I' re -n.,�-•-��i; ��iiii•_,:iiVn:t,liJii` u;hared-ii$c path. Pg. 5-79: is part of a regional connection through Spokane and to the Washington-Idaho state border,The new Appleway Trail provides an additional east-west corridor for pedestrians and bicyclists along the former Milwaukee Railroad right-of-way- Spokane Valley is actively working on extending the Appleway Trail,and the City has also identified other opportunities for shared use paths along Iormer and active rail lines. Spokane Valley has a well-developed grid of arterial streets spaced roughly one-half mile apart,which is typical of 'communities built in the post-World War[I era.While this system is efficient for vehicle travel,crossing major strerr.w Iii:~ Sprague Avenue or Pines Road can b.difficult on foot or bike since signalized crosswalks arc spread far apart •\dililiun kly,croti:bugs of Interstate 90 and Trent Avenue are limited and are often located at busy ii7l :' hiln� s or intersections.These gaps in safe crossing locations isolate parts of Spokane Valley and lead to pcc.1Flc!'lei:ing for short Iii1:5 that they could typically make on foot or via transit.The map in Figure 26 illustrates a ri1ngc of pedestrian tiltiilltiCs in Spokane ',:alley,as well as recommended improvements from die Bike and Pedestrian Master Program,which is the City's adopted long-term,bicycle and pedestrian plan. t. •- !, hicycic IR:lilies are an important element in the irailsrhox ,tetwork that provide a safe and identifiable bicycling 5 enviionnicnt.Dicyclist$in the Spot,. _1! 3 variety of : liarz,d-use paths,bike rouitn. to u_ac'r, 27_ Ik,yjv 1:1 the. network .•17,h icte r; dlIlc,ilL arierial to Ci ill LI I :•10' LI .II iJ .iu 1, ,-n-i)torizod 1E' velis ;:fly hstrails an,1 hit"! n, ;..: soinu faciLti,1.5 aye no( :ml I1ILIIIIJiLI.. Fuic,27 also shows pLr, l[or the bi( P .5-al; in.cludes wide lanes,on-street parking,and a high member of diiv,:-..mys,vlu. I ILakI UilU bicyclist [1:,-.1)11,.1 table riding in the street, Some corridors,such as Sprague Avenue and Mission Avenue, have striped big ire'.1-1.1.:.1lso high vehicle speeds and volumes. Pg. 5-93 BEST PRACTICES Modertrizing 1.1;ji-oydn1cture I denting any infr....,Irionu re that needs or will noJed updating or replar.-,cfn,221(1)U11,1'7ri Fir!: ibil.Y2 investment beconN c.ril 1k3.I vill allow Spokane Valley to budgdl accordingly arid I p:1 infrastructure tillurcJ. iI efa v1ii rnany JiiC. t.3f infra..:Arucl.ur this planning is Iv-ally:1Ni.;to Lity., its residents,arid ernibyees. Mrahieninirg(7..rvf Compared to other cities in the 11,3 pood Cif!'Lm ir wiiii I 1I*I-1,2cl to street and Iwidc maintenance_This r.,;5511...: [0'3(7 GOtilti 14ro.:14,;Ind nvorc.. oppoiturwe.s to invest in i-pthci-GI y priorities.The['I C1111'.1 mitt street and Alia Win continue to make inf•iirlid decisions ahout budgeting arid capital expenr.i'.iiirQs. Ouitimoa'ai Systems The effectiveness of a transportation network may be Limited by deficiencies in the connections between transportation modes.Identifying arid fixing places where their ate safely concerns,a Lack of facilities,or missing Liisl wile"coanctioits will ensure that Spokane Valley's network r ,unct,oilscolirmtJv and efficiently for all users, Exhibit CPA-2019-00'07 Draft amendments to Figures 2 A R ure 27 and Figure 46 1 , . NMI, ....,,,..._ - - ----• _/:„/ /.././ ,/,/, '<Li, ' .....----,----. E Euclid Avt3 ds MiliWOD 0 *.t.' _ ____.-------- • 1111 - - 4(• . : Ili , -------‘_.„, - - .. ,. .- so _ — -4dir I fr'di - --1----.-----------.>-.. I X --.4' I - ' 1 i , .7 _ ---- - ----.. 1 - :• III i .1111111‘1111° # . WI":IFIC II 01" nil - I WEI a i r' 1 '0 1M E MIssion A..e. 11111ir ".-- „,..<=a 1.1 ix I 1 31111,M 1111.1111100: PM .5, - -A E•ntaido Ave ' 41IIII "'Mow- cunt Matt r, AIIIMINIIIII -- _E.M.,_: , .."-, IIIINilmeeiaITMIIIIIfrrm."liIlliiMill IIIMMIIIIMININ . 1011111-- + ‘,0 • III. r-r -di 11 — _ ,- , I ME= El ill /111//ir . C111 ,--cr_ mai u 1 _ 1 • .L RIM . T H 1.: Mei - ' _ 1 • , A , a , - . 1 . IIIIIIIM i rf E 32ndik)../ r , • -• -— . ,, r A /A r = / / /7/4100111110 wttii / ff / , , r E Upriver Dr LI/I�t a i s e Me .RS Z■ Mlrabeau Pk N Wo ... *ti E Euclid Ave t 3uckeyeA a'olio! 1,.,,t 'II E Montgglmery Dr a'_Cerr� 9 ' ,�-�'� 1 .___._ _-r E Indiana Ave .��,�, ti it E Mission Ave ' ' .... E Miss 1.1111 m a t -_-1 a ` . .. L E 1 r o +.� ; EI9+ q, E Broas�way Ave f° r _, j • a �. _....�. ._ -_ Df l lX z 1 m U Z r surstsrar' z t E5■ra■ueRve . ter -LI-- ..�._,._ r r ; - I E 4th Ave I - r 4. I I t J I I I ! ! • , Dishman Hills r E 8th Ave Natural Area ; 44)? #{ 11 ..ss. a. ti u VI 1 16th Ave m CC m Sate IJ; 1 , -� .` Consejvahr_ C rc'tI 12 1 IX ' % E 24th Ave r ..._ + I Cl) 1 1 _ 1 1 + tr 1 ' , , E 32nd Ave _ - ` � � E 32nd Ave 1 Distlman I-tills Ix " t Conservation Are r +.0,4 t * I 0 r 0 E:4th Ave E 44th Ave ,' . i 111j-4. (4 .////,-; / ',`,r Blemen�ary3�� IL�.d ,Semen y F I ///ii, �0,ll m ar t -/` view '/ West"' ..�/1< _ ' -- fast �' .. Valiey//,,,,„////,,,,,/,„.:-::,--.,-.7--,_� ,—r.�- . ,r !;Y.if --� Valley / #363% - • /j',/ , /` " #361 I Arl 7 c � j Mil!WOO. :lemente r I I EEu•idAv- i \ _.__....._ 7= st van • :enter Fill • _-----\..‘-. \•. z ...---,,----- • 1______ ..........,______ .._____, , i . ____ .... • ,,,,,.., ., rtrr _• . 1�1 R _ _ _ .. �:. Riverbend . - `— . E,, __ ..�._... . � -�� so ��_��_ Elementary Lc rn ng an. E M Ilion Ave 14Iit66 ur �n.�`` •` CUlttral Barker Nigh L� .. aT-.aching InV s North 4� Valley Klndergartan Cent a C•rater Bread Pines. School and �� manta ' Y wog =ss ■■ _ l delle Learning _/Y s rat,>d©Ave � ! — t J sn a - .J-� Dim rata ry ... ,,,,,,,,— MAIM "— i ■'e E Vlanney j -- 6.: ,�J .a 1 Pioneer and C3reenacres , l� P- St'John Ulanney, � Ralnbaw ! Middle kp's ''/:/ / .: YLt.--.,..,, `jjjYtu0Avg x (_ ,/,/,� / ,. :kud ,1 i nacres ,/ r _ r mrnit I Mai s Elementary . f , central chool E -. //, J'ff, Valley,_ er)y (._ ; t Adams Central:.. �'./f�/� Oppprtunity . .__ _- �msnt I earn6 r Ce I�ValleyHigh /, . • Ele me me ry University 0 latrtenta Mkddle •., EI en-ry , ry ! `� r ,- ,.,.. // ,, S II 14 dat% e uth 'tis $ nrisa Central �.,",././err, --, men E:men ry Valley#3b/,/'„, % 1 r- ,E —iv.iley '�� ! ! ' `r` i Chris -n f F .-� `fff`/ , ti /" ��— ,/,,i,,, i 7 1 Chest Unl ray !, i Els Mal_ i High , /". Paid se •' ' Har€ n --",/,:- '�;'. Eiel tart' , r', /:, • f/.f 'r/ ' f „., ✓,# 1 - ,moi. i.` .',r/ Exhibit C?A-201.9-0008 Draft new Appendix A: 11"x17" Maps • . . � • | °~~~� � _- ~ | ' _---. __� _-- -' ---- --' -- ' _--_ | ��/ ` | - �, I .;',e- , 7 i ___--------- /4 • • ' • 1 _ . , j -,:r , I --- ----- .... -- - _---- •_____...---- -- 1 -- :3 ---.----_____,_,,T:eti ...L....--.-- a co __-_, I r E Euclid Ave f../01( . -- - -Iii-14176-•-•\ ' _.....,...o /111 Point Parts (-- . 7, ( "--,..... ---.. _ r _ - -. — I • , --- I ....-:,-,..--------- - IEW . --', _ *1 E Mission Ave •a rr.wrk-• , , r- ., • V. aD i rX --vil: --'-' r------ . E oini clo Ave ouniry Viaia Dr c, , , • - -^-___ .164: @-. I 4111 1 1 •• • • o 0 • 9_, r ....._,_ ' , • . — _ N .. .III AVG a i ,11 k ;•• 111 ar a yy.A3 l\'' ,digiile r ,e5 siimilm....1 omrali: , .1111 ,5 •..., 14 . i i 1 pp' ! . . i I 1 I A1 ... t i 'V _ Saltese Upland,- 1\ conseiva I irA 1 A ? I . \ . 0 a cr c Or • . . 1 4/// .=. , ,,///(// / ./ / 1 /',//// /.., ./ . E 32Ad A** i'•"/ ' 7 / DiMinkrn Hills \1 \• • • • V ,..2„ Conservation Area \ //' i ..„,.. , __ i y, ..._. /://' ,. ...„ , .....„., ,_, //,,,, /. L I MI% mill. Ai i ...mil . .._,...-_,,...,..._ _...„ 1., . / .4 400•P _ _ _7 •• __ • , I.- ././ / ....... . _ ../.._ ..," /2 ....,-- E Euoild Ave . Z II MI I lw a o 4 `' __ ••—.__.,, --C-- i - . . .... 5 I 7 1 -11-1 1/4- --1 ... e ') . _L.,.' _ ____-_,---1-1 _ .-- . _ ____ , , ....„......„, , . _._ ..,....,„ 90 . - - - ''' PIP Int • - -...._-_ -um . 4xt r snu .•••........ 1:, gilr ria T Initia ' r" 11 :. . i I II,. ____. A W---• - 111.1111.-Himi- .,,,._,4•1 Tit , LE I E Mission Ave il .05 im aill: 7• IMINIMMIIIMIIM " 41= 1 Il 11 pc OM IIIII 11. 'G._•-----:----- - . ' 7 eCs Ji 1.5101111111101=ral - ..':-. .,.- • . _ in ,.. IIII: 1 r-r I / , -ifriP' lig.Wmi "I 'In .1.01, _ a __. • li •:,: •. :, -,.• . ur --1 1'1 I in 1 CI r - re* SI 1 -. . i --, ,. lidi4 IIs' ! 0 0. o.... r---1- ''';' c : 10:40:40-o re Ell fler r. 1.4. • ' 0 f 1 ' 1 . I _.111111. ' "/ ' Nir•' . M. -•• 4/7/ / i E 32ne A , '/ A 1 ' [ :fiS1101,1f1 r-1.11,-. C--.,r1SiqfWlititili An• re. , ././ / , i ,. ,... ..... . // 7 ///7/: / . . .IIIrf i E i I r • EEudidAve ��tr4 � —� f�`IEF-btu-e El _• p 4,•gli 1 Popiil Pekl~�' f(t i ►4 ' '� 1h... .w.-.... �a# Gi7.1'.9tq EMssioaAve N a 1 T �rie.exrs0,,,mw r:t�033d cc .I • ■ z E akaWoAve Z i I • I E Country Vise ill' MEI - ^: I I d i u1 'ue i c AP� a cI I 1- A 1----"-: : /I./ (p,fsB1. T ! �� iC f l. /►'1.1IWar ! Uri, , •••.,„ f I T '.7 / KA4i \\ 27 J Am f 9 /f E 32nd Ave ' f//i" //// r /// . f/'f ConseYVdlli'1fl Area *.� j ii„.„ f /.f J F; J ;/ f r I - /////*10 � / C! fff t* f /t;///. f// .// 7 ///.// '/ i2 . . . • . [ 0 _.. .. . .. . . El - . .... . . i _-.--'-'----------.----.-- .------ .. tlik.._- 7------------------ .., _---..... ......;..." 1 41 . S 61 ....—_------ Pv _...7 .1 . _ Ave i .. _.. --- E . . . . .. , . lifilligiM • ---- _ _iv -4•-- • — Pit,,,., ••••,,- i . 1 . _ . Rim- dr '-- — . •-Nia,---"Itili& ti • F Mission Ave .. 1 ii--. -43. . . ,_ _Al ,eseidomB L f 5 . .laIIIIIIIIImm. 9 0 _ .. ____ ___.. ___-_---___ ••• •• .. s"...1/W.- ..A."- L Cr - L .. ; Q 1 1 ' -.., ::.1 , -...... . . . . d .;-.111111111.IIIIIIII i 1 sis 1 1 . [ • . , _ 1 I , thi,,i;,,,,,,,,.., 1 , 0.. _. I 1 • A ^k . \r. j i 1 /A, 6-aire$c. Uplands . _ . • ot-iserVallori 6,,,teL a 0 , 0 1. . . 1 " /. .?. //1///77/1-A 1,.. .1 . . •, . • NIM - .., ..// 1 A .. 1 .. , , • . . , , 0 „„:...„ ,,,: , .,,,, : 11 ,., ....,.. //1 1) .'. / s i r ,• ., . . i',-..e.m....., ... / / / -- ua /�� Al r„ / f jrf -alt CO 23[105 19877 i f--------- -Ai11 -- , `� 3132 _ -- f' I D N -a / �Y�- !_f n f-d co 1 a / a�9 9 ,i� jf c _� __r—� r 1 Millw - 2242 �� o _ d �clldA _ r:F ew 536 2386 � 2447 -2120 4451 • E k ?= .0' . 7568 12411 , 8357 yt' e ` _ _tet ._._8.398_. 112'13_ ' 1-' Cy> m 'IP CD ` - r'i_, 7009 5901 • ;Valley 4.7685 r,.-8643 6176 �`;`' 45§8 4138 E Miss on Ave >� in z r.y v N COco a CO 1.zn 0es 3$Q� �. E1 COq-. s— r - e M co ` .. ! 9 Q yyy 1. N t`7 N rr�j w co r :: coun '.15(.2 i 8403 r' 993 10811 8986 8343 8946 9276 2 '8709 9327,, 17774 61' i�� 4 (NI 10133 _ r rn �y cam: M� �n �r, �195fl _-- - -- Liberty c� o0 00 N r- ,P N c4 in N v A3515 G .dw Lake 0'- 1%08 13388 18995 21847 25288 22051 19948 r-20310 - 19686 18906 409 3277 20 1316• E Sprague DivaCD 1 tr) co o 16636r �"r' `; 1915 .' 1593 :-1644 ;::: ::48858 ur 7 n, 196$ 1108 Natural area011 36;77,435296 8 iik ;.. 0.3 / r-. : ' C1 r• / f , 7 N / � �alSeSP'_lplaflr7S 6855 7046 �84� 4614 4$54 4556 i f /i:N .,'iservavon Area , -//lA - \ \ A cp r' `n NvCe)N V i• 918 1478 �� `1539 2715N.2296 2654 r,�, 4 l / r ' 7 8698 10632 11209 ,094 / �,!!//_/). E3214'''."r /8438 rt!shnt8rtrkii: . T +' (u�� /! m ervauon r-o L'c: ,.. / . Ril \44,46Je 1157 , , 139 //'7517r>/•-- JZr 4**4' ,,..1.1.c.9.1.; - f 27 to.,r^roak I .-..././A///- • / T , J 5300 6300 0 8300 N = ,_65'00 - oa 77-.7- _ ----2s1007:-..,:\ ff 00 1 q�-- -:24fi - g E Eileii0 Ara *^-`� E gmN°£Wa -301p0" i f Iwo-• 1 — 11100A 4300 r. �70�0 4100 app 1 j 6,,00 /�--� _ 2% ' l $$ 8 ,1203 6700 13600 --------- __. ii f - 1 4100 ----_,___9700 _ 2100 . 0 8 i 90 560(}f '9fi500 20300 16100. 0900 8 E Mission Ave 5000 . 8800 8200 10500 10500 8300 12900 0 17 a ��2oQ gx 4oa � 8 n C a 2C � 0 3g4f3� n a i IIP-,„ m.r- u7 m ? 7 E 5061 Ave I 2 it 4 * �o,ri,yVIVO Gr 9200 10300 111100 11000 10200 10400 11000 13200 m 12300 13000 20700 9803 2800 2300 Pilir ¢e i�S m g `M ev cl n w �1 ave sty$` X 00 ,, r� ---,..i�y E SRra a Ave '16700 chi 29300 `• , 23400 20800 19600 8 27500 c32100 2 34000 2 31600 8 28400 8 29000 8 25800 g 27000 26800 6500 5100 026600 • "'.77000 18000 r N 3 co r4 / %1000 a 1600 8 3200 0 2700 8 2500 2100 8 2700 0 2800 8 3800 m e r.;. 500 3800 3700 2700 r, 4000 3600 3000 3400 r a' 4100 v. o P., 'v/4\ ,17,E e nlr[d 8700 9300 11400 6900 1 83000700 -a 6200 F Q CT e'l d P 1 1300 1700 2700 9900 8 3700.z 4 ///// f- 1300 r a o Ci.) / i 51 i Wv; ' , W. Le) co E J2,tcl ll ` �'� fr 11100 13600 r 1 00 y11200 GI 8 •`,. Ire //:::: f 1700 27001 ,0 1///7/ 4. • /A '// !�� 40 "7/7 Er � 4 D3strlct 1 e N9 r ' " ,-/ --9 --&--- --- --~ IrA, ! Spokane 2� Consolidated CltyotMFllwood — .' A Kaiser Industrial �Irrigation Mit lwdod Park ] I 1 f -5etvPe°ed by Orchard Empire Wa • Trentwoad .� District N19 Avenge Irritation R * • Dist at#6 ¢ City o} - Irvin Water ! - 9 MIltwood . District#6 llirabs'eiit v CIWofMillwood E c?€tri!Daft cc ne rid 6y Orchard Avenue_ - Irritation - —�/ ��~ ,\ - �'y District Y6 z .;.,API nes tett I Home Park r,, ¢ 90m Wit# •• Valley -4111.1.- Cans• at.• 'j ' _IrrItet bn \ m E h4issfon Ave — Diiiil 19__ $0 • `� z tt • o Canso Hated -'! Itr i `-Irrtpstt n Distrlet 1.9 -di E+ataidoAvo • • e---- ---- --t -�� r Hutchinson - Y---- Modern Electric !z • / e Irrltatian n W.Iter Company Mgr lct1f16 a # f e.RI, ÷et !_t .pre eAve j� ra e cA Teves 91vd 2 7 Spokane Valley Fire • 'Dishman Hills //:/ Nattrrof Area • e • rr F /'r { ) i l,• t IrrlgvIon ! /'i fflCseyl1i}ktrf� a .�..`..r yam ., - ] Model — -! — Wu&rr.ar.0:.: 1 0 �__ — jN. Vera / 'r f _-- 1 np - Irritation -/ - • f { DIstricth5 `' % f - 4\ Spokane i • u ////f CovntylNater .7/ t r .:',..:„..://, .-..--1//'= /- J f/ ! Rlslrlti ff 3 � � f',' � /' f 32ndAv4 f -�-f.r-.. Disfiinnn f-llll5 r /' 05f / Cortservofion Arco / \ -• r f.. . I L ; r Spokane County Water�- / / , , ! District 19 / � if yvlew ElQmen ry ent _ — - I I / _ .-mentary 3'0' d Vall7-/-•-7---- / East 4.„0', ,.7 �•' % Valley 40111j #363 /// //././.1.-/:::( #361 Millwood -.nt ``_ ue ;iementary�� E Euclid Ave E4 to C �ti L�..[[; -st Vail,y ,, _._, .enior FSi�F � _ ._, f e ti. • 5•oke ne \__ �� _� ugh 1 - 1 - ti` (. li 1,.' —rr.4 ± verbend `fir rY E Mission Ave 5 ` "� - i �.. Central t Learning and III Ar;hur Earkor Igh `� Lrnin air z ss North School lnd Valley Klnde erten CentTeaching $ �� erica Sroadw,y Pines P, _ss d G neeran t ■ Learnin ..11 .. 'E i alaHtoAve l E Elemen a =ntary �,,� ,. ` ■ � Vlanste - pioneer and y I�M' SR JahnRalniaow Greenacres „ ` •' solorio VlBinne , s „ MlMiddlee� �- C3reenacre9 ,•/ r, , r` ummlt - Marys Elementary ; i,/ %, / a - Centre! ;School I - /:,-.,, / , Vale l--NAdams centrefle` 1f/.f '�` —Learnt . p Kunity— ! • 1'tcrnertt Valley +� Ela entry High f�!� ►r 1 , University • ~` / Et- en- lementary Middle /r//, / S�.+tis Upland!. '. ry / //.///2 /� r ' s'usc'ry 7:Ion Ana wine l to' '4' /K-//////' ��r//�/ •dle South "r =s S nrise TiC ent!'al/ . / 1 111 r, / , Vile El=ment E=msn=:ry Valley#35 / /E 1 valley [ Yom///,./././27/.,/ E32nd - •Ave , /-/ I I Chest Uni . - ; /- EIe nta High ,%.r ,f: Ponde�'JVosa Horl-•n 'Y/`, < • Eli® ghtary _ --/ /,/•, �`•; i f t. v0-....,A i',ro // . : . I ,,- — . . • te,..-z,•1,.... . . /7. ... ... . \ ---- ,---• ...—______L. -- ____.1-4--------- --4--------'-°.°P----- ' 1 I E Euclid Ave EEmOe‘" z Millwoo• ----•-- -••• .) t J -,3 ix 1 1 :-.--- ..4,2 _ ..'' --\\ '7' — • . - - . - '",.. Z I, .----• .__• .------....,, 00 E Mi5sf on Ave _ .._... / - „---,-- t., Z j a E Qtaldo Ave sw00101111.1. Z i c -----„,. - - —-------- — ----._ E COun try Vista Dr AvePRISI e .rz 1 z 1 0 _ Natural Area i SA '•- TD ii 1 ' ,.., , - r , e -_ s. . , P k G. 1 • ------4 - - \,. ... . Sat tese Upiands 1 1 S • '..//71:17-77 / -\,. \44„.. Lort5ervirit ion Area .k ..- 1 . • , .,? \ 0 - i 1 1 , // --- -,/ --1 . . ‘P. . I 1 4.', 7, ,• //7 -.1,. • • • •••••, ' .. \ ! 1 E 3 2nei Avc I _/ 1.---3/-.. •"1./ ' ///// ' ) /-.7 Di.thmatl Niles . 1•€:,•i,,ii,,,,,,,... comervatian Area r 07 i0 \ . .. If re .,• / 44.!0",;,,, k —.__. . -.1..„.„,0 I .......,. ,_.. .._. . ... v / /... _I . ) / P . , -r .‘ ... fYz./1/ --,, • . . . .......,,.......t. /.//://///7 , • --------- ; . _of 74,-1... _ , 1 E• 'OA • ' ..- ror ..,., . _....,.. 290 - ' - ' ,///// • E Euclid , Ave EEmpire-WaY --- - li MIIIWo*GI I I / _.--- .;'s- -....,„. .. . . . z z — ik -----Ad ---- 9D -------'--- ---'N, • : .....•- , -.sr --Nip- • ...., ....„ \ --" ,. •---. •,., E Mission Ave ------. -...441kh•-- '--'----.... _----'k' ce 1 . _. ECI 77. ... cloAve *.0 -------Z1— I rio I 7 e--••.--- ' • 1 la Z _. ._ --. • ' . 1 PO i c•C\ ' N•1:°. a E Spr4'gueAve i , ____ *siva&Estvjm.16 1 _A !---- - • I 1 I i ! / 1 1 i UReAN i 7 .. . , 1 NATURAL OpErq r' r 1 reol., i _• •-. ' „•• i I 1 11 CZ. 1 --"—. 411,1, e Upla(.th ' t--- /j • i `._.(lrirvationi,. se ,-- \\I i t I PR ANC 1 1 1 I 1 • // /___,/;11__A . WATERFOWL CONCENTRATIONS rt t., \11 ! E:32nd Ave /774 . i Fr ,-,A,,•,,,$i,ui t.,-6.,,.,, ( \ 1 I WETLANDS I , / / '-•...,.. . i LED / ' /, ? . . // .. ROCKY' //' /,,,, MOUNTAIN.-- - - — F. --/i, 7 ///,/, .4' ROCKY ELK MOUNTAIN . • . / // / UK .lta..F •"91 . - 1 1 I I ' . --. \ , q c I / !.--'" tn *V : MI!iwooTd--Y' . -"- e .- -..1 c . -,, \ _- I..-_---_. jZ ; , L. _ ._--- -- —-------,, 90 allk_ _ . I.....7 1 E Mission Ave -our -Q I — .- '- '''--- - ... ...,- ix • ----- -__ -.;_ m -----•_,,, -, cll E CataldoAve Z 1 Fu Z _ _..t( - — 1 1 la i Z E ,pras e Ave 1 I e , Ecx::::::::D r y Blv E A epiewad , — , . :,ibior + 1 11 ! _ ci. -, T.1 . • I 1 F I • ,z.,t I i 1_ i I ix `zoi ter:Uplands t "k 0 __.1/ / Co rr,erva Con Ai ea w . ? ----- I -5 1 i I vo v-, i 1 [ I 49 1 F/ / 41 ::// ---/// /:/// 1--- a • i 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 „//f/ a a 1 a '//1// . 1 1 '/ E 32nd Ave 11 i 1r",;/-'”‘ , „--- ,,iiiirin Hills __ 1 / Ipiti,k1 $ , _ ________„; 0, 4 '' . / i /:/ $ dit, Art ti.r4 ' 1 - - • / /) Exhibit 10 CPA-2019-0010 Draft new Appendix B: 20--year Transportation Project List 20-Year Transportation Improvement Plan Il 1/208 his document identifies anticipated and potential projects that fall outside the 6-year TIP. x \ry Grade Separation Projects construct Grade Separation at Pines/Fsr1S1 Grade Pine.s1BNSI�GSE, 2 ,000.000 7-10 years 2025-2029 RR/Trent sa294)I Separation ^ Park Road I BMSF Grade Construe Grade Separation at Park1l3l'Sr Grade $ 25,000 DD4 10-20 years 2030-2030 Separation RR/Trent(SR290) Separat on Intersection Improvement Projects Pines Rd., SR 27&16th Uprade or replace traffic signal Inlet section $ us-/-00,0010 1-10 years 2025-2[129 Intersection Irn:NDvernent Mirateau&Mansfield Add traffic signal or roundabout Intersection Intersection Improvement $ 900,040 MO years 20252029 f3ih R Barker I nterso4iion Add traffic Signal or roundabout Intersection TBD 7-10 year 2025-2429 Improvement. Improvement Barker&Appleway Intersection Replace traffic signal or repldcesignal with Intersection TBD 7.10 rests ' Improvement Project roundabout Improvement 'Bowdlah &32nd Intersection Intersection Si,,nali. •roll ,. u •: rin -atilt:aid "a • u- TBD 7-10 years 2;:.',. . •! Improvement Improvement Thiierman&Appleway Acle Is'.ti.-iirl,niorc n!:,nlc.inri sit=n,rl intersection Intersection Improvement pl.n ii i• rmprovement TBa 7-ieycars fug Ci�S 4th&Pines Intersection Intersection F 10 [3 'years '[??! 21729 Improvement �n ' r errs c 'rr 1 7B Improvement 9th&Park Intersection r IJrirc. tr I;I c c:aritrol drn, ne Intersection $ 9•400,04C 7-10 rotors uTb'?li?g improvement ronh2',:ri n,ren Improvement Sullivan &Indiana lnterseciip:, Add 4ecurut.t.. , rrnn .I If..i.:urn,ane intersar tion $ 70.130U 10-213 years 2030.2039 Improvement Improvement Sullivan &Mission Intersection acranii„ur!!e:,stbound'.o i"bcludpaleft and Intersection $ 61.000 10-20 years 2030-2039 Improvement throrri•I- r f;ht Iniie;I cir..-.if.ial Improvement Sullivan&Trent Intercha a Upgrade and wir.ler,tirade separation at Grade Sullivan/3riSI'T IV Ai ISR7Op] Separation $ 27,004,000 10-20 years 2030-2039 Fenchir .•.Biar,dvn+_'Intersection widen to incl:de eai1 ind westbound left- intersection T813 10-20 gears 2030 2039 Improvement turn lanes and remove sprit phase Irnprovernent Pines& Indiana Intersection Add westbound Tett-turn lane,retiree traffic Intersection 903,000 10-20 years 203fl-2039 Improvement signal.Connect sidewalks and bike lanes Improvement Sprague&Argonne-Mullan Reconstruct Intersections in concrete Intersection $ Concrete Intersections pavement Imf:rovement 2,d00,000 10-20 years 2030-2039 Sprague&Fariche r Concrete Reconstruct Intersection incencreto Irntersectien 5 1,800,000 10-20 years 2030-2039 Intersection pauement Improvement Sprague&Thierman Concrete weans rt:rr irirer,r•ction inecnerete trt:ersecticn Improvement $ 1,300,044 10.20 years 2030-2039 Intersection Rave rn_nt Sprague&University Concrete Rer.orintifict irrtfrii?0,00 ir,J I1Crete In:ersech•;n $ 1700,000 10-20 years 2030-2039 Intersection I iinirnent II1KitVertie,t Flora &Trent Intersection iFr olioin.:J,_,.lion •rd add Inst turn'ane: Iror;ecti;in 5 2,200,000 10.2.0 years 2330-2039 Irnprovernen! an riot..Dr Covert.CO'a rorrrrdataouC Irrprovoine,r.' Evergreen e= 32ra I Itcrs,-..lioli Iilcrsection TBD 10-20 years 2330.2039 v!;n;;ll: w'r•r>f!Clicrn'II .iC.cF r;;rq'.rl;al-•c;til Improver-le n rnvc-Cont k..ec nEltrer_ti1ln recrn struct roadway to ci y standard and Itr n r. r L'I :n 3,irke-r Re=construct THD 7-10 years 2025-2029 aJd-a_ss eight-of-we Reconstruct to a 3-lane Section with curbs, Pa k RU. I.t't,.l-lr t;3y 17 Irv!kii i sidewalk,ttike lanes and new s„orrnwater Reconstru41 tk 4,500,00+4 7-10 years 2025-2029 f iris t s Arnorin-;&I-k]I)B,,icclr f1•e sIr2CL Araanrle Rd I'c't?e 10 3 Lanes Reconstruct 5 10 0U0,9[}D 7-10 years 2025-2029 I:Y1;7I CY.•C!n•:.`.Ill P.•otrl hi ,'t:id 10'sIi 5--:I •_I,e sidewalk. Suilkvan L ti 51!0 [ane IP:id s i trr•ri.'rr to r 1 i5-.scctian a5-' 1 cl'or',;nlri Reconstruct $ 5,300,000 7-10 years ;.2025.2029 VVC1�5fL1! intt_•r52Lic.n5at':I::ell5-r,r:not 'Sinai-1w In rtcfr: r y ,.f.!-lioanci2r oew, ;11110 Section v.'itrr Bowdlsh Road-161 1 ttl Spry t:a r e 1 t.i r lbws,.and neve Reconstrut-t $ 2,900.000 7-10 years '2025-2029 cte'rrrrl.:flr•r faculties ii -dr5�'� iP,_I'rirl with rsrc,--I r�t-acrcz t d+n'. Rowdtsh Road-24th to 32nd a :F.si;Ii-. alk,I.iIce 1ornF,_nd:,ew ReCQnslruet $ 2,7O0,000 7-10 years 20255-2029 r rrmr,,.VrL,,_Ilit.aa Yt'1!7!1 ii. 1.10.'x.,T:r.o 1111,...�l i Ler Rd with Broadway,Ave_-Flora to da:ker et:u lanes,Re84gn Rrca,tI:Py connection Reconstruct $ 5,2oct,OO© 7-10 years 2025-22029 east o'barker rrdre it i.'i-_.I.ne r-ticn ^.1 rubs,sidewalk Flora Rd.-indium tc Bprague Reconstruct TBD 7-10 years '2025.2029 and 110,4 Sl❑rrIT 5-J t'J, f{ hike Widen to n-ease section with curb,sidewalk, Mission AVE. F3F:c i Ic Cily hike lanes,new stnrnwater facilities and Reconstruct TB13 7• Cl1years 2025.2029 Lrnit5 turn lanes at key intersections Widen to 5-Lane section with curb,sidewalk, ;.111 veli PA 24111 In City rani; bike lanes,and rlewVSi�rrrlWatCrFaClliti@5 Reconstruct THD 10-20 years 2030-2039 Reconstruct uitrh curb,sidexralk,bike lanes, k uwaisii Road-8th to 2.Ith Reconsti ei t s 2,900,0011 10-20 yeirs n702F -2029 ;.lci nr:vr}-',I r rl:•i.I..1 *;or.i11t;g$ widen t5-': lana section with curl:, ;Irlewalk, Barker Rd.-1-90 toMisslorl bike lanes,and s,iiiirII I,.tl]'Iroc;Iter Reconstrul:l 1C-2C"years 2030-2039 Facila�ns P.t 111 tf rxis:inf)1 :I,t:,,rn,l rnterChanse^ I-9O Barker Road lnterdlarnyC- Reconstruct :G fCs,66O,O['11 117-20 years 2030-2039 & 5-a rr.h.1l;cld,In Ire:;Nies ;ufdr 4;I;.li Ii i!..2e;1r,o,rl approaches to Finns Rd,&1-9C lair clr oo: I,li coo n5-, n:Ia 1.1. I\l �u11sI.1 act TDD 10-20 years 2030-2039 le•::,epr,rriJC tt1 J I:i tiIL ILII with Oh Ave. Dish m n Ellice to 7 RD 10 20 1t ?030-2039 Sullivan :•lcurrrkdtr:" f;1r iiiR4 'alrid.I ill;-I iiI Cctl:,n tit^itnI 301 Aye,. -FCaval a to Peck ;iriria7l6 Eike lanes and new stormwater Reconstruct TIS[? 10?1);5-::1 s '2090-20139 ',I C I I II I::•'; ilcsrrf.rrr :1111 li prnlir In? Ione section ail F4v: -1;0 ti'rd new Recons trod THD 10-20 years ,2030-2039 SLijItr 5-1 ,,torrie..•+i1=.jr',II'Iltl'Y5 'Jui•icn 70 i,.11-1111 Ii:sr, r•ilhcirhs, °•erlahnn Rd. • :k! xt": :II'r ,i,lr`+5-,1111 :til•.: 1:1115-:and:few sturmwater Reconstruct TBD, 110-20 yea's ,2030-20139 1 irnil [ctIIct!oc Res X1114-;rtr,.y r,vrn'•i Park l - r1 tflr3rCr1-,a curl: 1nll crrbi c iIL 7a lam Did zrcmiriLt. rs nt ' IxrMr:'n^.iruci TBD 10-211 years 2030-2039 c1rIIF:;u' la IT$along Broadway from Pines Rd(5R-27).to Evergreen&Broadway ITS Evergreen,alone Evergreen from Sprague to ITS S 1,8 70,000 7= 10 years 2025-2029 16th Ave. Pines Carrider ITS-Sprague to 16th Traffic Signal Control 5y'skem for Corridor ITS 8C0,000 10=20 years 2030-2039 Pedestr"!an&8icvclefSafety Appleway Trail- Unlversily to Extend Appleuvay Trail from University Road Peri Si f]Ishrnan Hills Co Ji5hman Wills TBD 7- 10 years 2025-2029 IBike'Safety Flora Rd, Indiana id Sprague Construct shared-use pathway to connect fed& Apptew-. ;,all to Centennial Trail Bike/Safety TED 7-14 years 2025.2429 ['ince. l r. - Mii3Ln::ar,. F ire-x.., y to SInir aup math tonne-ting Mirabeau to ped& 1 rent pines c;4+.' Bike/Safety TED 7-10 years 2025.2029 •rr_-:all waylinairir;^:it,naIe to connect Connections to Millwood Trail I•.�aod a arc ti : �$ I r scction5 of trail; Bike/SafetyS 350,000 7 10 years 2025-2029 iat•li r:c-.incctinr,Irrari it;:i1'ti, 12th AveCr055 Add inn: ml bye r 1,c.:11;trcatrr�i},ii,al Im r4vc-r ii ,t; arterialrntersectir�n tL.twe4,i Un:ver,ity� Fled& TED 7-10 years 2030-2039 P and Sullivan f3ikelSafety I:en! P.illr:':. y- Park to Pines Shared use pathway along Trent AvePed& Bike/Safety 7BG 10-20 years 2030-2039 SI: .,i-f, -,.:rh Ave Street Ped& �.� ,-r r: Enhanced crossing,treatment atSR-27 TED 1 b-20 years 2030-2039 Bike/Safety Spragrl. "railicad Pathw,y Shared-use pathway clang railroad line from Ped& Boulevard to West City Lirr•.its Bike/Safety TBD 10.20 years 2030-2039 Create Shared•u5e Path on north side of 1-50Ped & Bike/Safety Noiill C 1c r ri ci,�< f''7tl'ry ry I,,,r;�llel to Boone Ave.and Courtly ripht•of- 1,100,000 10-20 years 20302439 4l".ly Transit — STA: Sprague hIPT !Transit Cocrclirztr.•"iti STA's improvements,to Sidewalk Improvements ac.oir ,nn;lat_I IP1N on Sprague between I--Ensil –fit) 7-10 years 2025.-2029 Flv'abria arid I-90 STA::Mirabeau Park&Ride Caordir j►2 with STA to shift`vlirabeau Park i :.ii:.il 111) _ Ir. tears 2025.2029 HPTN Intip-evements &Bide to accommodate HPTII Si A;Argonn5!ark & hide I-MTh! Cn.orr' r -•iih STA to 10ca0, HPI 1.4:•.+r l: Facility:STA I ;;;;-;il i Irl . 11 :.:r_: �::_, 2020 to I iti DENr.;. AND 1tECOI\.1M1i".NDATIONS OF THE SPOKANE VAT..I..I0' I'I_ANN 1\ ; COMMISSION FOR 1'01.9 COMPREHENSFVEPEA.N Aill:.NDMi',NiTS 2019-0001 TIIROUGH 2019-0010 MARCH 14,2019 A. Background. 1. The Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan(Comprehensive Plan) includes an annual amendment cycle that runs from November 21111 to November IS' of the following year. The Planning Commission considers applications received prior to November 15'in late winter/early spring of the fol lowing year, with a decision] by City Council in late splringlearly summer. 2, For the 2019 Comprehensive Plan ar}Ittlal amendment cvc?e, the City received three privately initiated requc" :r I. I.'rSil}I'ti' 1!".i}j 11't'- :}Ian al i:'IIL I!! '.il`:5. r .;ll;I 18t,'.l.1 ;I; ? 1 I P 11:L.1 1, + tfti"..°`l7])-01,gy2, and siik';.r'11JIo' ed tot a l,.l}1110—ctic13ti•'•,'c I'at'll i:lll'.;ndi tem [ w l".ti,:l'...oliiirg.,Classifc Lion consislt:Iii will, lir,: land use designation. Thr:ti_:ry ipitiated one CoAl;i:c:•__•it i„:c Plan amendment and .umenl:r.L::lt; dc: ionated as CPA'201 a;„.:11)01 through CPA-2.019-[)0I0. B. ELndiri tip; 1. Spol.: it 1v[I.n',ci:ra1 Code (SVMC) 17.801,I{101 ,troviccs the framework for the pLFa]ic to particil:..rt: :I'ion .l l rr •!ie,, Comprehensive PI pi. r_iiie..r1r[1ncr.t :}recess. i + icE, an{I public hear o:). I.;1uirements. 2. On f".1:-.)7Lisy 26; 2019, the 1 ;:i.i Liniit of Commerce erce was provided a notice of intent to adopt rtlrt rill I;+ :it€ 1 , 3. P'.rr- i:nitr Lie t4:re F;iiv'rc:„nlneii':11 Policy Act, RCW 43.21C (SEPA), and Title 21 SVIVIC, en`.'iI(;I! lle:liral cI}ecic,ist. were required for each proposed Comprehensive Plan map and text 4. SLi1I reviewed thi.t I1L'll,i II;Iu1`' II ,_IIt': I.l_sts and altlreshold dererJnirirulcn was made fore each:'ropo ad Comprehensive I'i:ul .IIlierkin'T..t. Determinations ofNon-Si gni ficance(DNS) were iso cerci Cc: each& the proposed Camp,..11'..rl:.i vc Plan amendments on February 8, 20 19. 5. The Planning Cornrti:w:•it;I fi':lc; the procedural requirements of SN)A and T 21 SVMC' Move been fulfilled. O n Fel:,rua ; nn.l r Hi vl° ?1 i !notice 'r r tl:;proposed amendments was placed in the Spokane Valley News I.Icraici .r.«: t':!CI1 site :ttbi�ect to a1} ;tn}cndment was posted with a "Notice of Public Hearing”sign e tIt J. cirr.cI 1 lion of the proposal. 7. Individual notice of the map amendment proposals were mailed to a1I property owners within 800 feet of each affected site. 8. The Planning Commission reviewed the propcl ad nicm lou nts c aucur got y to evaluate the cumulative impacts. The review was consistent with the an 11 I :l:r,rnd1}larlt I:i oces,t-utlinod in SVMC 17.80.140 and cltapter 36.70A RCW (Growth Management Act). 9. On February 28, 2019, the Planning Commission held a public: hearing rrrl rho proposed Comprehensive Plan amendments. After rer•e ing public testimony,the 1'Ialio ng(lornu:ir cion closed the public hearing and deliberated on the Co;:,pr 1}en5ive Plant amendments :ind voted to forward to City Council the following recommendations! Findings and [tecomrnendetions of tl}a 1 c ;int \ :1Ic;,' i Ii-iiii rrl f' C.]111 m isle rl far proposed 2019 Carnprclt:.r,s.v Page 1 o13 CPA-2019-00011: The Planning,Commission voted 5.0 to forward to City Council a recommendation of denial of CPA-2019'-0001. 1. CPA-2019-0002: The PIanninz Commission voted 6-0 to Forward to City Connell a recommendation of approval of CPA-2019-D002. CPA-2019.4003: The P1anninlE Commission voted 3-3 and accordingly no recommendation is Forwarded to City Council for CCPA-2019--0003. CP'1.-201940,09i The Planning Com i fission Voted 5-1 to forward to City Council a recommendation d,i �Ipptivo.a[ r,r C:`P .` 019-J0i19. C1'a' -2111'9-11[1Ui1 throuvh CPA-2019-*t3f! and Cf'A4:Ot9-1 i1110: The Piiliming Commission voted 6-0 in forward to City Coc t-ic:1 ecniiit:e relation of apl+roval ro9 C}G'A-20!9-0004 through CPA-12019- 000E _inti! C"PA-2019-0010. T1ic Ccliurlis:ioil hereby adopts and iricoriiorat 'it:7 for c:iil,h Conl,rerl°eo!--Jvc. i Ian A ICEld ITWril l[at:nu[I iSccs.Attachments). Conclusions: The ]}1a;11ii .!r Conn hiss inn finds r'i 1111+I:r.itrc ';1'i`.l 1'I'.1C 17.80.1d0(1-0 • Cornprehemik•c Flail Aiiicr-Idrricnt Approval [_:rifer a for C':A-2f 1 r1.0 ]1i:' r, l°. I .+ ', ft' , CPA 21)' -{;i 1f)^, CCP A-201 c,•lJ00ti, CPA-2019-0001, CPA-2..014-1008, C:' :'il.'? (rill, ::ir•.I S 'l° + 7,0i41-0)10. Ti14` IJr'oilosod 2:)I{; Comprehensive Plan :s:c c47n istenl with the goals ::114. ;, ;li_if:s of the SpokFme V'allr.:y Coloprch:.l.11ve Plan, and will pi-o1,ltitr ll-,c, I}11 lie herdtl:, s;lt.'iy, '.'WeiCti.r r.;' ' .!ion of the environment. -1-ho Pliluiii:7[. �1iiinrliissio clni s not find erompliance with SVIVIC 17.80.140(I-[) Cciiii.irncensE'<fe Plan Ainenalir.e:iI Approval Criteria for CPA-2019-0001. The proposed arn•ndi:icrit is iiot rorlsisieri the:oa]s ilrui laulicilsti of' the Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan, and will not promote the public health, safety, ,.vc[fr-w ,or protection of the environment. I'[inn irig Commission makes no recommendation on the woposcd amendment CPA-2019-0003,and as sc• whc'her CPA-20y9-000 ; complies with SV1'iC 1`l. 0.l 0(E-1), whether it I'irin, and -WI-Lc:.t]1LW i[ [iro;•iniC'h s tits,public let-t1t11,r,.3fety, welfare., and :'I'=stir'•:u�,ll off the erivir.H.1I!1'..11' iZa i.nin Crutibii§}hiss. iI r'ik�' `.r:illey ^4".'.,iu lkrIlUUS the City Cotinoil approve the 20. C1r.mtI:''IC:lens1Ve CPr ;n:,1: ["_Int 1t'i`.)-lit !_. (11.1A-2C,19-60116. CA-Y.-2w 9-0007, CPA- ;t. l i,;il.`.k, ri.l (.[::k-:rii19-1)010. CPA-20 i S-1110 1 i:; 1-nrw4.rd ci with a l I;ntfrl.'liuri to deny die ti r ii., ;i Iii i:l I i' 1} §1?1'1'? (1ominkNitiii. C!p . 015-11003 nt]3tton. Findings and Recommendations cis""chi.:Sixd,,:i4: '1d I']rninir for proposed 2019 Cemproli iii'.r4: Plan AIllcliiiriirrltti Page 2 of 3 Approved this 14th day of Larch,2-019 Man Walton,Vice Chairman ATTEST Deanna Barton,Planning Commission Secretary Fuld'rwri airJ Rcc„rttmettda icrlstf [' ;171i':ing Conlin tQr proposed 2111'.9 Cecnnprc ;iw^4 Flan Arc. r Criu s Page 3cif.w 1''l" Ibl.N.GS .\NDRECOMME+NDATION OF THE SPOKANE V.• I.I. I'.}' P1.: NNING COMMISSION FOR PROPOSED COMPREHE),S1V l:; P1.1..N AMENDMENT CPA-2019-0001 '.•larch 14,2019 A. Background! 1. The Spokarine Valley Caniprcliensi\' I':art (Comprehensive Plan)includes an annual anendmIlidii cycle LI7riI :'uns from Hcivember 2' to November 1 r of the following year. P[an r'ing C:arrl :d.sion consider:; (applications received prior to November P', typici1y in laie wi,ite:'iearly spring of the following year, with a decision by City Council typically iii late spring/early summer. `.. Fear the 2C 1 t1 Lo]oprehensivc Plan annual a:ncndrnent cycle, the City received three pi ivatc:p i ritiaterl requests for Coml;r:].l ensive Pim arrieiid:ne:ir.s, dc.signnted as CPA- '201cj.-000 I, CPA-'}t11 9.fl002, ,::1'.A.-?LI19,0003. >ind one City Elluendrrierit CPA- 0009. Sites :.il;:ci.`L:rl ':r; t Comprehcic,-.ivu Pain amendrir5.r!I rcat.cive.a torn:.r.. 1 Las! itir,z,tira:z cr nsiYtont '.°.'.i:'r the: new land use 7 : ;i�}r7 l he City llll;',a'.ed six C:crr•rprel7ensive Nay. text amour:heats_ Pic pre pOSed u!11e.1dniients arc c tri:idcrci concUrrentlw' and cl,:trat:ilivL]v rcpa:chip potential impacts pursuant to E CW P. t+'ir+rlilti : l'iLr ii;F,r i4} Sly: l;;ui4 '' ,!i 11 ,' i',lr.+;ic iii l Code(SVla1C) 17.80.141001),the Planning II..: ulIii •:r:l I:nc.i:res with :',._:card to CPA-2019-CCiOI: . Ars :t Ir rai;i:r, ,:+ 1:. .1_rrc: Ito chart . .I.c r:.:t,:t1ruhensive. Pian Land LPs Ilesitantion fr•:7r,L !ATI Irl (I) Ica °;;,rrl.: Eamil 'Lai (SFR) and to chat-41c Ilii'. o[iink LJi:t:'ict from lnd...rit :c!1 ,:1; I„ ::i.:'.G, l atr,�il Residcntia.l Urban (I\ 3). 2. ilia nurr..1-.::I 451.83.9059; addressed 6) cr : :'ark I Cad, lr r .1UI) Icet sotc11 t l t" : 1lai.'I. vL _tli .rl IF IF-l: Q\t rLt' ....1] 131 r;.l•.,as� r'v r:ue, fur117� t`r'c°4[ In the SW t ;,l Tic' it r! 1r'. th N:rri'1 U'illaoi+ [t. ',]L:ridian, Spokane Colr.!; 3. Pursuant. I.o ti,t:State Envi:.annic..-.l,HI :'n :c.,, .'.c::- c:!:+1;°I:'r 'i 3.''IC' [?°,:;'�r1 {51; .".] ❑ i"i Cl? 21 SVM(:. 11 i;i-vironmental checklist was rc::;,r rcd low. the prop o.scci C.oniprel-.i2:15:�vc Plan mr:l :1,:7t:r:c.1, lent, 4. Staff reviti';°::d the t:,!'.iwinmental checklist, and a threshold dct�;!r ii,;..:ii�r7 v� :: i!i,::le for Compr.°.lat:r•,4ik'e. Plan amendment. A Determination{.al Non-Sig!ail •.wic •::.;'.ii.cI I-i r II,:: r o,posrad Coiniprehensiv'c Plan rlrncndiiaent 7n January I 9. I::!a!riiay, l;lc�� .;tai° 4i.a:i lipids the procedural regilirenicuts ca'. ,EPA arrd Title 21 1'`�•lui �v �0 .�i1L1[il.cd. r:. `/MC 17.1i0.[40 pr n ir;• , °',r: t. ilii !ca, �a.rs, 'or the ( ':E!!Iwrr.lif.'nr cve Plan amerldtrient process, including I:t!I,l.. I::!:.:: ii1 L'i!)Il. ';,,±i::.:.<:n ' l r bile. [ic,rri:lg I—cluirernents. 7.. On February 8, 2O] .. ..l h•-'I• u,r 1: , I', !catice i)ir the proposed amendment was publikhed in tlr: . l,c kar.e . rrll o .i,•,. l:(:r,ral. 8. On I .l,rt„rn; '; iinil ....,:rri...7ndmen1 process outlined n SVMC 17.80.140 and chapter 36.70A ReW (t1r.00.411 Mm2-:reinz..nt Act). 12. On February 2019 1:m PlInnno,Commission held a rthlic hearing on CPA-2019- one I A lIr!;- receivinp,public tstirriony,the Plaming ColutiOssion closed Inc public. hecan ciediberations. 13. TitE.. ..ii11:1ic licoPh, safety, welfare, and 2roicetion cif the errvironment il1p_ot he served by °,1.`,e rloposel amendment. Transitional riegtillions will limit tIK impacts cf:new dcvelopmert., hov,:cve,r.they will not ad tlrec: inils f0F existin 1 L possibl.e liar coiifl ick rnay Result by trio oxtmsion ci ri:r. idential tise.: into areas .A:Tuiiiikled 4 ind.carial or other ype5 of hLI icr intersicy uses.. 14. 'fie proposed arriondinciit ._c the C.orwrelinsive Plan is nod ::'..ornprdiensive Plan or the.(i:-owth Matiop,cment Act (Crivi A)chaii.i LI-1.6 The )roposal is not cons:Mont lowing Cam proH.,:flisivc Moo a. 1-11)-P6 lrc;TrA.,V the dc,vel on rnent or 7eclevelomacint of'.. IIt arid timicriv.iii:-".ed prupuriics, those •,vii It porenthil osc rye as 1.1 catalyst for ctonamic 4.7,eCleprin2rit. Surporl. tic inixed-use areas into acucssi1.11e1lisniffs ilial aitraca ceonornir aoivity. c L I_J-P.5 Ensure coniFaillility betwen EVS41c[c_ial and commercial or indiritrial uses. i.U-Pl: Ty1nj iii a :oLvio .:;apply of poducl_ive innaslrial hind. I 3. Flit:, proilo. 1 amendment does not respnad to a change in conditions beyond ic proryerty owner's control. 16. The inoro.52.d imoii1imiii co,..7.s not correct a inapoing error. 17. 'lite Frocoscii anwridincni doe:: oiltiress 311 icL:c:ctified deficiency in the Comprehensive C. Factprs: I. 'the.effect 'Ivan the 111]ys1c111 Laivironiiient; There are no knov,n ,.-tai-acteristics tial would ei eale !YH'....i.:iet iiki,'NO!017 the property under die proDoc.d do3ignation. effect on optnt space,streams, rivors, and lakes: Thesie does not cc:indin any sircains, rivers or lakes. There be lleni! i ii. in !Vic open SpACt 3. The compatibility with and impact on adjacent hind uses and surrouuiiii neighborlifutilN7 Tic current zonaig of h!te. propeity require tiaii,aar repniatioir-: an s;.;c to mitigate impacts ar hihh0riniCNISRy use Oil A1.11 ainc.nc'inent view approvc!d: than transitional fe,t,ulations would I>: adjacc.rir pnrcds at the thnp. of development and would limit red1y2lopraent. Limited Tells:11.es to mitigw,e,S LICk i1111)V,CS ;1111 pojLii ion of dust hc.tvq-;::en incompatible on pre-Lipid i cation rnecting!3 1110 Corninis6)n idea!iiiod tlie as al: industrial area and I leO 111110 11 il.11::nf. woo Id H.i.low For Rs.sid..?..itial encroachment. . 4_ The adcquac.7,,of and impact (III COMIII including roads, public transportation, parks, reet-eati•Ai. ..,:cinnris: The proposed LII 0:107111:Un :I k,:ty 11:1!..aa on parks, recreation or schools. 5, bemeii( to the oci.01),04-117ind, and rii:ion: TIEs p•opoitn! 'Lap ',Tn.:10111k 1.1! increasing the incompat*tility ohLi:icIiin iiscs cach ether and Y.C.!,)1.H 1"y 6. The (pi an Li[y nod Locri Lieu rff hInd for the proposed land use type and density and the demand fins acli hi lid; - Plnorang Commission Fionings kocrprnmcocimnsi CEA-7::19-0C111 Pap2or3 .111,TC aLfutLr Lklildad Of I C:ViCti11:11 7. Uiic...tirrt TO Anil prijeLfCill in the area: TIF2. IIIL hi diri I Of ilK 101 0.111L.Triplated in the Comprehensive Plan for t change impartilflD1L On population density. 8. upon other aspe.-N..:-.{31ihe t..:(nuprolicnsive Plan: co:14:11r1 with the Conprehensive goals and puIiis as identified in 13(13)abovc. 1) CORCluSion: Co..-nrEission does not find clornpliarle.e with SVMC 17.30,1400-l) Comprzix:Nsivc Plan Ai-florid/1.:erit. Approval Cril I L.,. for C1';•,-20 I .. Proposed 2C:9 Coropreliciiiive. F•Ari CPA-`2..019.0.17:111 with I:h.:: j_.4.1(11_., polic:_cs id the Conpro.11 .1.1-iive and will not promon.. Hint, tvotcction of the c:-.virormienL :::;rit;v1C ColnIniSSiOm ;:•:•:11H [i • ;Iiiy proposcd 2019 ,:(11....ni! 1cnt CPA-20194)001. N.-Larch,2019. I I Hi Lii Pkinnin.: 1.• ',innings and Racpinmcodadon CPA-2019-41iM PAP 3 cf] 111`1N111 ' [ A.ND RECOMMENDATION OF THE SPOKANE. V.1.I J.11'Y PLANNING COMMISSION FOR PROPOSED CO1 IPItE1-iE'SIVi:PLAN AMENDMENT CPA-2019-00112 March 14,2019 A. Background: 1. 'I2ie Spokane 'Valley Cori,pr2.11-ioiisi, PIfin (Comprehensive Plan) re1liciot an annual Amendment cycle tii it runs from I`�[vf:nl'ber end ro i` tvrembei I'' i)i : It. IoIioti owing year. f'11e Plar'li]1 C-;alniiiis5,on considers npp[io itiors r.cciv:cl prior to Nclv'en:l e typically in late wintt.-I•fcr:rIy :sp1'rnr of the °01In'.'4•ili yeaar, with a iI;' :l`.I{`'ll .:ry CityCounc[l typically in Iaie 51?E'iilr?Cr1r] stuff uiur, 2. For tlic Colnprehe:lsivt: [':a::I annual a_ilcndnicnr cycle. t:ie [, itr' rc.c:'.:iys:'ri three r'u.+ i •acts for Lana rehw115AV ]b' tr ariieiid i li:nr.. 7� ,i: :i:Icci as CPA- 2010-00D1, C 0••,-20I 1:-1"147., and CPA.-2019-DOW. Sites app-ov ri i`e: :.I Comprehensive 1'IrIE1 amend mew_ I'':`..::I\•r: : 7.171;H-' c'as.silieation consistent with ilk' :it'Vr I,tni':I (t-ie r'Lti]L IIi on, `f e t;;14' I ill.;;',.L e[ S'f1C: Co-rinrehcAsive, PIran anicntI(iI -I1 ICn.'. I.,`; tl:xt F1i:1cr141n1'=1nts. regardiir'.potential :I:,pacts purs'.ir;nt to RCW 36../0A,130(2)(6), B, Findings: Pur.,. ]alni to Spal.rrl.c 1':'iuti^cilitll Cotte(SVMC) l7.$[1.14 .'(?: .:LL I':al:nilid Co'n'niss:on Iii tl:t4 .itc oII' '.';I:LI'.Iifindiros with ''c and to CPA--2019-0002: 1. A v'e]rcly initiated request to change :he Comprehensive Plan 1,and Use Designation ILi'i nrlc 0 it- ±;•,I.i l,a Disfii.c:t fro:.: lE1r, ' I-tunll,- I.'s.identia Urb,.-.Iia (R-3) to Ncit',1;bD-:ioot` �. 1r,.b..) • y'u]:<Ir:ln ',Al the ;tate Environiiiental Policy Act,chapter 43.210 RCW(Sltit'+�.;, ar.d Title 2] SV.viC t'.I, ,:II'+ir€7t1n1.dllt<il .•I.ucklist was required for the proposed Calripreheensive Plan map ar_lcndn1:011. 3. Staff :'L:viewdc'CI the e ivii iiIt: ieiii;iI L',14:' ,']::t, and a threshold determiJiation l+ilF made for the propt3.3.od Co]r]r1rc ie ii:•,i'''c; Plan aiie:I.11nent. A Deteziilination oft—ctiir.. . ift:ilyce (I)NS) was issued for tilt: pi-oposed Comprehensive Plan ainendmcnr f1; I :•.l)r ;1:y S, 2019. 4. the Pinning Commission finds the.procedural requirements of t ::la,{, :i rot ':i:t.e131 S 3r M I' have been fulfilled. 5. SYIIvIC ]7.30.110 provides the rerinirc.rnerl'S. `.:ii the Comprel`!c'r-Isit'c.: ]'lie, ::Inrndnieut process, inc:utli1ig public parti°.. 1:,]ti ,I r rIiic.e ;m11(1public h :ariii.r :.aquirLniQnts, 6. On February 6, 2D19 the subiei l r;itc t;;i t::a ,' 41 ev-ith a"Novice of Public I Fearing"sign and a description of the proposi:l, 7. On Fehr'r.1nry ,'. 71)'rl ao.rl FehruLa-y ]ti, 2019, :uIi ° : r 11.0 i l' l;i sniff .,—,mind::ie.:it was puhlis[i.',I in t'.ic. 5piil:.]nc \'alley News Herald. +?r] ]:etrrn,LIy 1]1, '(t1';i int[i3 i Liol rin:iae of 0ie 'nap amendment was mailed to all property S}'.vners within 300 lens of the Snlyj^ct site. 9. .1. :ic Planning Cvrrintission tevicv.,.,;tl the proposed amendment to evaluate the c iuntila._ive IT.pacts co]I'ristent wi'Ii CvAi (i ,. . 0{2,)(19, The ruvicw•wwa r rjlitiist nt ,!,?Ill the ii]I1al r;rnendi cent [irl c ;,rl_.i:lc:tl i] ;;�, 1C 17.30.140 and cha,itc:.' 36.71;1,r RC\V (licowtll Iti'1?°I'1gern':Ilt i0. On l cbnter}' 0. IJ i 9, the Deparilit;.:nt ;,I t,;iiri,iieI- ,• \,•aprovided a no'icc of=:i k:ni to adopt arnei1C.r,enL; LC,the Con-11}I .IILii-ive Plan, i 1. On February .'.i. ,'rl I t1 the ;lantii:l ',.°. l:lrl; l i::ci 7 Ili'.lil .I il:lill lie'.] ' s on CPA-2019- 0002. r0002. After recivvil-a; public testi]licji e];]• .:I tltc public hearing and began deliberations. Pluming Commission CndingsnndRee mmcndatiattCPA•2019.4442 Page I o14 12. Th.. health,safely, End oretectiun orthe envirniano:it will be served by thc. :iTriendn-teirR. Dc.-isigniiiinf!, the prop.2rt...,.. as iiitiLi..Hboi-hool ccirninercial will rieui.. :1-inrInand scale s!2.1-',.lc es to be devc Loped a...id Valley 1-1411 d.... velopod iiicI site, Su.rvc:the ;URI !-,,c I :,..reets„ water,sewer, anti iIiLLF Lil]liUc , ay.... available to support the proposed bnienclin...!iu. and will be provided thiii.10 i of cleyclopment. 13. Tho p..-poscci arriCAIL11.112€11 to the COnirrnhRilive,Plan is c•unsisleril with Growth Act(CNA) chapter 36.70A E.oalsIieJ bdow. The follyAfing Con-iprehensive PFIF1 gl.MIS arid 7olici es: dci..inlopmenl in urtrEin areas w'ilore adequate public.. iii1itic. rid ser. or c-Jr [ o plovidol in an cf[cic:it niantic:.;al-Kt b.. P.i ,o !INA those 73lible, racilitre ar.d c.rvics ne..-....isiFary to support developnient shall he to scrv.;,i. the dovel.opriierit i 11112 time (hn dcycicipinent able for oc.c,_,?anc). .„ise wit..tout Gurreni nnin;inuin siririii_ar(!s; and I support u..-...ditornie opportunities .and growth IS'pokare d. LU-P! En.courage scale con.iiicr11 uses in 14. The.proposed a stioHLiiatial chanv. the property-owner's con'iol !he LegislaLive "prt3V.' I me., plan_ 15. ,Lorruct a rnapping error. 6. TIT2. 1:1:16 C.c.i111211CY Nall. The 20 .1... .11=1,:dit;t17.4:1 iht2 EIS a co.licaunity priority. The amendn-.....nt location was not in upd:AL., ii it Jo cs offer al-. ..-ft.porturtity for srniiicr caI eommeccial area that is gerterally coniiiint wil hi tho ctitoi..ia For NC. C. Factors: The effect upon the physical Cnvironment: The Glinrip:,(4 le' NC will ;Al utrimercial deve/opment of the property. The site rjfl fikLily transition fro:I; drivewaytrees, lawn,arid buildings to a LOL1L1.JCiill Fi ldiry. lariscaping, arid stonnwater tre.od.rr,.311: rca.:. the c„orn•i!,-,21ti2.1 „71,t--T•1,-,:-Trient. Both si:tBS have beLli LIP.7A1 :,i-.-crig activity. 2, TILFLEATeei IFI 11V.01-S, and lakes Any ilevcloprnent will be and trcElic.:j. oil le site. The,site :.ivers(31. lakes, The open El-inc.:2-areas associAtcd ‘,,,ith the rerpliced Iii [ and side yards wiiI liLely transition to paitin;,:r, or co.ninercial 'Flit carr and impact on adjacent land 10.i:111d urrouiiidin neii,thborhoods: Ni .di:v.:,21cprient is purposefully limited in si.zz:o reduce intitac,ti,tio al D.ii..clo..)inent standards will I irnit . n..1 Location of i-iny ldscaping Will FiIUCL Ilie nri.I.KILA.s It) oxi.sting,..:111„Kch is a pertnittec.lir:;:: in the NC ?Dile and was devcIcipmeint .....hanges, of LiSt W-1.-!,141 have. to be a pri".fiL°1,..:.d N.:; /_onirig district and comply with, ilic.NC develo-,Nricnt stank:Ind:3. 4. The-. of and impact on conunnuity racilittc,s rnchuiliug utilities, roods, Public tran,-portAoti, parks, reer..2.:itiun., aud sclwols: L'on.11-nt.:1-c,.mi use 111<cly nave rolaiinal. inii)ad on oarks, reereaticin a need those LacAities. As iüic ciiior thi.7; CP.0.-21.:'144X102 . are smaller ::: sc[1I:: and suit I'C ;:r ,'hla9ellootis_ Slr" i,:,l!I 1a1[!Ci 1[ I'I 1c:ip LL r'"tl to 1[_I ll!'.' Il :}tl { t4.}3GI�'c.11a 311 ;11 trll ;i ilrl:l clan iect ;yl`.c <orie %111u v.it i the I-� l -111 r,_�_,,n:',. n: 1 At.,eiII]c is 2!n I.Ji j ii-r V!ii'oi ArLcri:;I. 11'l.rnor art!:-- Ll r.;cv:de inter- [7::;,'. L::a 3'Eli7' , i oiiiicc iD115, ti`L!':si( :YCceSS, and serve both local and through ll +rip:=. 1';l} t[Enacts DFt :•l1IIYIniI:::,; tIcijlities are anticipated. `1'11+:: 11&'iiu01 tlr Lhe neighborhood, City, :Ind region: I Ill 'I)11+ .:i,i:dative tpd.<lie 1rc:•casoc C11`'IF':':I'll[Ilities for nt ijrl7l7r'i 1.L1 [I 0.7 1111,°l:,'lrll :IE.'r'. Ilillll t:lil City_ Th, llc\•clop!i Ln'.. "f ITS Ilei llf ,t Il:)CLI r; <tlrcaa;' l y the. 1l1 .:I- ._..! •:carr I.:r_ial 55 L.Ilrl. I::t;1 1s.:'- r,i ifill 4 1 ``a LI' 31LIL{, 11], l4i.+l:ILLL and 1`rcliYl':. ,}4+,(, ,,, L� •� till^ I h.c: tlli . ':'Il'.rCh is [I ':','•ILki111L,?c1c1 commercial development. The li'.F1evelo I:JL;lf ai 111u ,!itithern i;!,,r1] i IL1'll. l:il11'1"Y residential to an •\JC ilt;e, slid... as e ticc, '' ( 1l;I;l allow 1I' ' Illrlt is und al l:rcl I l`.l. For ills 13catiDll ac:os4 frain rbcs sc:iool and air ar•u:11 tr ;r ,Fill+ .11, Ike41ii:111111}' and iocntinn i 1[and planned for. tilt 111-1;];ri ecl l;111[1 LISC type awl ala iisilY niid the t1 rr7.11111 tor such [and: Update le. til:. Cer IIIC.'1...'ll ;j', 1'lC1Ii Increased the :l':. :S illc7t i1rC 'r.til'}t`;I NC. lands i :'L'rG+: iilf'.r:al III:or. . ;I11ILi :ll .. ".' p iii1iirilLi: located SilLi alt ilio intcrst.eti. :; Cif I6:l: <1nd S'.IIIlL;LFI, :'ik. "'Itll ;ll!I L!I.I".:iI. Ai:l'.PI I tiLLII:: :':'::l!I!....11: !;t:"'_l1Cl I1a.1$ icv'C.I017i.i. it 16Th and S' Ivan. ! 1l tilt: [.'.'i: 4f: '•.:u, t! "1 I ic:, ltii .i I It.; lllis oto, tic : , 17f 111Iivirlsite is .lue only SITe liJ rC It.'.'u1:r17 1.xu':"I CII:: .:. Liii l>:_', Illi.) ;I i,C1:.'II'. l Phar cl ..'f`i`ll-rciall '.,IaU This site is located tiL+i1I-,in cane hie utile l! major r t:1ii i:,:I;_t:^ .i1 ` i,l',Iguei :Iltl:.veri and :iii it LT retail Centers at 4111/Sullivan. During; ,r il7lti ni:rin I; I III' { L'lill:.1 ':ial I'y: l 1-}!-11 ;;Iicc 1. 1`•;11: .'. :,IlI;IC'!!t TlF? '•:[ ti..0 I>7 o:"over 2300 StlIC3['r tti. ;'[;.:r. [,'•:i1'Ill: ti ll'. !lief!: IIL ill,li. L:"sIY H.1-.)Hr[.`r[ l,l. c1t:'1F I+LI'rll 'lli 7. l ilc current :cilli projected Y tt d pt;I7llfJ:filll_ Cirllwl[y' 1I. .!lea.., :bili The NC sirn4le-fainil ' il,,.:Ilill; l:':,:;'I. Ilse; of the sot]tl: prop..;l-ty) and. cher are p ri:l!,ttcd in the NC '2..".11G' rind III: Iil'!;1':C;:;S !I 119 ':'ti:; L f;l. 1I: lend I':: capacity ,al il.t; nriner'Y. The reinot;ed d'.Yall[ ;t`. in lire..41 11°::'. (C7 i s wil (loot irl!'u:[i'.l ll7i: i7l'i i;l l I' 11+ li 1:. ! I � The effect ttpB,rl 1I4IJI;r i . pLC1.S 4111c C;nIiti71 elkeirsive The NC c: l J :Fli;i I r:r;:c! I i:.;BsrL IiI'i[I`r of the 12.0'!1 7,,n_r Ill4[1L:1't111n,:i. :tit. Ho. I'!;' t'r\Y ;. I Ili: Il;L1l)1:].- -:t [::114{ lit{' i.: 1ZIL:!'{' ',4' [I .'rr' Illi H C"r'I ;'Il the t`-apI1i1I and P '[11:l. 7. .IL:C":. h'Llh..l. lII:d ['I ".1t'.: i i'" 'i .. :'ill:::i :il.e L 11,,aI \raii: and L.itt;ral l<esetirce e:t:1:L:I'i : r7 l::c: i::unlprehcrisivc• D. Can The Planning Cr:oini scion finds ct1:J:i,I:..II .v'Rh SVMC 17.810.Ir10f:1'f)—Co[nprubc:ns:vo Flan Amendment €.riteria for CPA-20I'.`-0612•. Proposed 21)10 C.orlprokri..iv i Plan amendment CPAD 19-01002 is uClnsistcnt the guiil.i .incl policies crl T lie C'omprclicns;.ve PI:tn, and will promote the: pubic health,safety, welfare,a:1ci :lroteelion of file Crl4'iFoI: Recommendation: The Spokane Va:lcy l'I Lnning Commission, r•eca-iuncrris the City Council approve: proposal 2019 Comprehensive !' an !IntIIdI!leila ' P1't-20]9-0002. L,'..� •Ii.J'.`f''; .:}If l;ll; day ^.'l ii'_t 1'•.+;iltort, 'u ie�. :haii'[11;:II1 Planning Commission Findings and Recommendation CPA-28144003 Rage 3 oPd ATTEST Deanna Horton,Planning Comm is$ion Secretary pis wing Caanmissian Findings and Resolrtmendaliar CPA-2019-00002 Page 4 of le1NDI„NtiS AND RECOMMENI)ATIO,K OrniF, s POIKANE YALII Y 11...A.INNING CV.‘INIISSION FOR PROrOSED c(rdpittillENs]vii.. :AN M F,NDN11.:.:NT CPA-2019-1003 14,2019 A. Background: 1, The Spokan..,.._ V:11.ey in (Coi:1-..rehensive Pion) includes arnendrni=.1 n: 7\.,oventher 1 of the Folfte.,... The Phi-mini:, cori..,;ider2,„ ,trioi- to typi,,.....7.11). fonowini; by city CAJ:JPJ I Ivied ! e springlevz!y stirliner. 2, For'du: :7)0I Comprehensive II i annual amet-idrnt:nt die City roctiveci thTe :onloreitenisive 11'11 111.21!--.. ...L:.-;ii:!,11,'„1,KA;: a.;; CPA- i.pp.-ovcd for n...1 ve co, the ncv..' tiiid ii .. and 1u:it he- Lycly regarding potential impacts pursuant to RCW 36.701.130(2)(14. B. .Y1114 I illgs: Purt.tarit to Spokane Valley Municipal Code(SVMC) 17.80.140(N,the Planning C;oir,iniss:.°11 makes 7hc following findings with regard to CPA-2019-0,003: 1. A privately initiated request to clangthe Comprehensive Plan Land use Designation fi.Din Si Family kesicieniin1 (SFR) to anci ic chartgC thc ZoiTh..g District From. Single. Uthan (1t.„-'3) to Multi Family ltosiclantia‘,11 (1\-frIr,i. 2. Pu-,-541nt Eo. The Srite 1ity!toninc!ii:11 .2112 RCW (SEPA),and Title 21 '101° Cenriprellerilve Plan map arnendmenl„ 3. Starr Fe V le.weci the eirvimnmenial Lo-r:shoici made for '.11,c "proposed C.7orriprehensi.‹. A Determinatia, (1JNS) was issued for the proposed CompruivrirvL arnen:linent on F,..::1)rii,nr.!! 20L9, 4. Vie Platy:x:3 Commission grid 117.e r:HI;Ircru-p.2.111 c:.1 Sn..I2A and SVi,v1C. have bee, 5. SVi\4C 17,80.140 prcvides the_requirerricnts Phir. prtoces: including rn.IIic Firticipator, nolice publie hi. On Februairy 20 I 9 !.!:), 2019, urn IL:a for 111C proposed amendment was publish:2cl in chi 3tj ,Lrtiia V;,111.ey News Herald, 7. On r chrLary 13, .c;i pruscJ "1101.1Ce Of Public Hearing"sign and d Ow! 8. On Fc:11-1!•1 IN I 3, 2 d a Ii a dual notice of the ndment aru▪ rrhRiled to nil property iL.is00 Icat ci Ore subjeet site, 9. '111.,21.)1,11inlii. Coluirlision reviewed the proy.-.):,....-...JaTicni:Inte.....;1 • Cm. (Awn:dative. impacP: cc,,:isi...-Jeut with R.C.191 annual. amondinely. priacolLitlihuEl in :10 36.70A (( rowth I niapet aCuL ACL). 10. Oil Fetwintry .7.6. 2019,the 1.3'L!Va7iTIC:.1.il .0. (...0111111.C.VC PrC)Vi:kil anoticeofiT1entto adapt amendments.to the Comprdic.nmyL. Hint Planning Commission Finding5 gad Recomintt dation.CPA-2019-01303 Page I ur 3 11. On February 28, 2.01') on CPA-2018- 00C.:71, After re. iving pIhc testirnony, Ic IIanr, ;1!, the public hea:.ing ond bcEi.rp cielihnrations, 12, Thu Pla iiiiri Cirniuission re uwod Llv,t sag:„t7 report,consi(1...:Ivd pM)lic iostiniony and had ve clul I lyrnl.ons ontho topic,which included the liCe.r..! 14,U udd ti onal 1%.,4 FR lands if the r4 -lie. : would ruuIt in f1.171 lt-wids within 13. Thu L'ID111:61vConi rr. ssion \Tic(' an n niatior 1::11 rc:Cf1111-.1t11 that CiPy.' Co,incil Approve CPA-2019,00(13 I rL. Plannin,i3 .1 duel three vot.,2.s against. Piir!.a iot to thi.2 Ph;ia pursti.ini No. t.'on-orr2hiensivi1 aroc.ndin-n2nr. :in by at Leat four :41"..ri1alivc yo'u-. I 6.^.;-;!(,:-4(.'. Plin:ui lig Co-.nrnioit finds V1 e rCLTh5 11 IO !ii y CURIE:CI.. P...a11111110,Colnr.ith5SiOn RH 10' find that Si Ilas [IC. I ccomnwntiatio:i 15 Uu ic, nrcrvid:2:1:1, ot nor tinclis tvgnrft.rig Iii mvni selt forth in SVNIC: 14:.) are pro,...idal by EY:anning C0111Mi !3iCin, k-io'xever, the pihIic.ti-,SE':iriony, minutes ofthc uIC1IIJLFll:Lais of Planning Commission ano .7.7:11 other nyltcrizils in thu re.-....ord are hein, Conve_rdtd to CiLy Council for its review cnd co.nside.rac=on of CPA-2019-0003, 14, 111,.! 1'11-n111M-21 Connn;.s.sion nks i.. findinR as to the .613G -J.c.1171),safetY, welt ah:., and 19701ett i Oil Or the. (7L-Nit.:.-filriun. .-n! sienicd by proposed am on....Jrnett. 15. Tlic tin&ni2i1i to wimi HITior.clvinent is Plan raid Growth iViariagement Act((;MA)chapter 7 r)A 16. j1: no finding as lc) ...N-hocr.2r'he.propos::!! : bc.yond :11. ;;.•111 rnes no finci.4i as to wiled-Ler the proposf-A r..-.1ii:n-ir," COI I e LAS a lr I S. mai...es no finding as to whether the propo: (' ad6ccsses f.::1 in the Comprehensive C. Factors: The Planning Commission makes no recommendaLior. on the proposed amendment, and therefore makes no findings as to the factors identified in SVMC 1-7.150.140(FI)(2)- D. Cc-inclusion: Thc.I Tanning Cornitis-!,.i ori makes no ••-ccomme nciaLion on the proposed amendment,and therefore kc.s AID C.DriciiisiOri dc lo whi-21EKT the p:opo....-icd arricildnicrv. complieswilhi SVivIC1.7,80.140(H), wii2[11,.:r it is consisiont with ii)C Coiiip hiciici vc Ph cii, I villothe,r it IH-ornotes the public health, safeit-y; welfare, itiii procec: [on ilk,.el...ART-11111CW. E. Reconinnendlation: The Spokane Valley Planning Carni is,-4,[0:1 makes oolc.coaur.endation on the proposed 2019 Comprehensive Plan amendment CPA-2019-0003. Approved this ILO'day of March,2019. Matt Walton,Vice Chairman Planning Commission Findings and Recommendation CPA-2019.41DH pap 2 on ATTEST Deanna Horton, Planning Commission Secretary rbanning Com mission Findings nnd[Ix corn mendelion CPA-201 9-9003 Page 3 of3 AiN1:1, 1111.11.CoN1f1,1.1',N11..A•111PN (11, 11 I 1.1_ 'V \I,1_EV 1!,1_/,,.NNING PLAN ANIEND1V111.‘1' (1)A-2i9-1)009 .110:111.1i 14. 2019 Backgrurund: I ic SpokaneV1Jv Corriprehensi,:e Plan (Co:n prehensi rf. cudment yc1 hat r.atks Irvin Nuvcnthci 2h1tO Novemb1 f'imning Coatittisiolaconsiclens applications rec-eived prior to Nui ii I tyiliGally ill late wirifer.ifiarly spring of die k11(roeng year, d.decision :;,y typieally in late soling/early summer. Hir the Contiptelic!tsive Plan annual amencl:h,:hi, eyck, the City re,Lci,.....oin three icst ir ComprehenFive Play_ inondrachits, clesiE.nuiod CPA-. I CPA-2{/19-0102, pile one City initiated itonenchicrii CIA- I ippi-c vccl for a ainenHiatent ret.eivi... colcsi.sieat with the new The City inithftld six Plar text imultdincnt . IL pictio,,.NI .amendrnents consideNd 'Ay cumulatively regarding potf...; 1 ialimpacts pursuant to ReV/ 36./C....A,131.1.(1.111.;:. B. Pursti.7:at to E1u Valley VI rie;palCcidc(SVMC) 17.80.110(H) tl-.e Planning Cominission makes the following findings with rord to CPA-2019-009; I. City-initiated reque:a 10 chanpc l-AnC asu dusizilution am; district from Multi caritily Use(CM1.J). 2. The protntrty i .7lescri1i.z1.1 parecl 04,)1511, 45i n4.9151, 4.5104_03i:4, 45104.0315,45104,0311, 451014.01.107, ,1510.1.{)30fl 4.'1104.0330,4510,1,03:?.9, 1510:1.0323,15 -035'/ and, 45104.07,26, addrcssed as 13303, 13507, 135 13607 and i 3621 1...:ast M oil Avenue, I ocauLY iicrin of Missl(im A vcnue J LwLau Mc: ipte.rseetions- of tvli!ss 1017 Ave,I Lie al-di McDonald Road and Mission A Ve1111L! and Road, itirlIcr located in Section 4 of Town:F.111p 25, Raugn ,Ith Willant.etic tviurnfaii, Spokane County, Washington. 3. Pursuant to the S:1-11 ! -;.!.'rvironmental Policy Act. it:ha:pier 41.21C ItCW an::; -1 21 SVMC, an cii'H iiticritaL checklist wcis reLluired fbr the proposed COrilNell 2rIS I 4. c-..vironittental chacklist, and a iPri_:.!shold determination ...vas faitile For Plan A T.)et.,..!rtnination orNon-Sinificrince iSti',ItA far '111(.: (11;,..):1:pre..11eusivc Plan amendment on -121ILLi7 2t119, 1 requiretnents ofSERA 2nd T.tle the requirements,ft-.:r the Comp.rehensive Plan amendment participation, notice and public hearing requirements. 7. Or; 1-.4:.ifillry .3, 1110.:F 11.; and Ft...bruuy 15,2(119, notice for the proposed amendment was Lcc Spokane Valley News, 1-1cr-:11(1. 8.. Op i 2, 2012ifltIiVidLIZlI riotica of the:map wncii,.h:'::r.t mailed to all property thin SOO of the su.1)jo.;;1 sites. 9, 13, 20: c,,:td.lbject sites werc... pcstcc PHIjiii: 1_.1carilig" .r.--;u-! Hid ;-.1 ...aLteription of tit props-1. IC. 0:1 !.k:-,ru:lry 26, 2019, peva Copra:To:I! was provided a. notice at-)11::!Hi to reir"V_ a::iimdrnent.S ti tii Ci:11111:TCi1C:1S I VL n. Nanning CarnalisMon Fin dir1SS and Fa:Dammendation CPA-201940M PnF.c I 013 II, Tile Plann i Com in i.ss 11):.1 revived the proposal ...irrie-rtirci-mt ta :tluale the cumulative impacis eir y.:1111RiC:\AT 315.70A.130(2)(b). FLIL review was consistent with the Frin al a In ir,cnit il'ICC1 in SVIVIC 17.80.1410 and chapter 3-6.717PA R..CW i:Gro,.vth ACL)_ 12. On 1OIYAI:11-y 2 , 2(110 he Plan.-wn.:., Collii;H:H a public hearing on CPA-2019- °009. A icr )Lly, .1, P .111:!1n g Com missor closed the public and OCfLIl ( I I 1k)11 1.5. Thie riiii1)16.: health, siiiiety,welfare, mtd die envimnificnit will be served by the w.ciaese.1 ...1i1e:tdmeint, The 8rnc.indrint flcaibillty of uses and intensity in Xi sirrininded by iniia zonior 2Ii' uscs. Tit iL axeildmeni will iIIaw opportunity in providing c.iyilnleirkiniai-y aiIy EI1L I ud id the iUt benefit 'Jo1e .b.p eonskieni widi 1L •Iij L €11 14. Iho propcil:‹1 rv1rniiaii ; t ( riv11-\)chapiwii 36.70A goals woi.tid met: a. EflCCL1 devciop:A-itlit in urban areas pub!I;.: 1r:it I1ti es and sorvice;-: e:<11 Cur.. 13e [";:ovid.cid in LEI . t inintt b. Provides L:L(}1.101111:',cvICipiiiiiit minilar zoned parcels and utilizes land for iii1lI dr.veicipment whliin an Provides a suitable Iai&i usc on corm istent i%vith the City's 11.11%/1/',.. compliant Compri2ihensi via Plan, 1 . The pr posed arm:117.1.101i Es cciesisiciniw.1(1-; the lollOwi,rip,„CCETIKette:i1S•hwe goals and. pntieicis 1::1D-P6 Promote the development or redeveloprireilt of vaullit and uncle:.Litilized properties, particularly Illosci with potential to serve as a catalyst for economic;development. b. LL[-P5 Ensure cempatibilliy hiet,,veen adjacent residential anc! cominercia/ or industria' uses. c_ Litf-P 1.5 Maximize the density of development alorig rnaj or transit con id ovs anti:tear transit centers and commercial areas. d. 1-1-01 Allow for a broad range of housing opportunities to meet the needs of the community. CF-P2 ?Iv; Li:7a cif existing public facilities before investing in new facilities. 16. The prOpos,ct.1 respand to i. ubsil.anil al ..2:1itinge in cu: li Lie ns due the 20:6 Com I': C.. land use designailimi ,.`,Eritr.teol the surrou unikrwent an extcrisix.,L; citlLItIl Coinpreheinsive Elan Itip(1;jr in 20116. Aib:Icct ..-1nrCek lund uses and land use.rksir.:iiaLion. The.sairrouncliagpropenics tolii;e north and L. new Liiul 17. The prork-6.:„..„ Eict corro.7.t napp 18. The does nct addresi.: deticiertcy in th.e Comprehensive Plan, C. Factors; 1„. The urfeCf ir I Ilie ( ]' sial environ aunt: Th.2 OppOrlimily arid ad^-L1 a uiiix rf IISTS to serve the !..i.:10e. duplexes.;mid n-aTiorcial and office services. is nil rr1icanI1 all affect of plivsk-al .4TIVE-M1;111-q1.- 2. Tlic effect 011 open streams, rivers!. arid lakes: The siie (lis ni 1 cLiinUflany streams, tiv,:ft Thic:12 will tie :1pac-1,on the ope:1 pJhy.ri„ 3. The eata1niil,i1ii:i: with yiird impact on adjacent hand uses and surrounding neighbortioimk: and K.:!,2,311.:ncidolion CPA-201 9-00)9 Ptgx2of3 The amudrnero kinclly.:.,.2 (.1t!sigroion, and .i.7111ov.., properties to develoi Clv[[..1 (...1c...;ipp:v.ion and drwc.-:loprient the entire Mission 1. The adecina Cy or and imk::ict (ILL community facilities including utilitie!,i, romis, public tra.nsportation, rn.rks., ret-.1-uation, nil schools: Iheprop.u.sai hay. luinirnal impact on parks, recreation or set-lei:is, The City a TT cp....1.:a ion and Distribution Letter conciuding there is adequate cat..)aci!' :\10 1 5.. 'Etc benefit toilu? neighbuTiolod, and regi6n:. proposed ia d ic dr_:siKnitt ion pLov:dLEa ctia (1.,.,7v..-....loprient opportunity to the the corridor whi:cherionuragcs and impieninnts the vision fix 6. The quantity and hu,...m.ion of land planned for the proposed land use type and density and du.., Ht.diLt ..:,[ncr.dinert area is developed the amendment weutd but Iic. L dLIi wouitl allow for more intensive uses and increased VIA: current and projected papoLticicicnsity in the area: CS are,subliiuttially L.hit!'yc. CMU ditivelispinont i not dri6cipani.ii I, iiee or dui- n- l): .a the area. A I thougi it notc.,C, [hat.31...Iiitiow,1 units ccr.,4'. 1),._ sLtc4:iliove. the-current The el-rartgc !..flilotild not in on the in-oiccied Flit itVe I upon otter A!-;10.."C:i4 01.(11c11.7,orliprellc-nstyri Plait, I! 1)ev:),.lopritiii.nt, 1..and Use, ti; 1.1.H.1 I lowiira., Iilatle elicct en ftle. Capihi Facilities J! [ hililv ii vi . . and Privatc Parks and Cli:Kni Natural The PIanijn Commission SVMC 17.g0.1.10.(fi) Cc, :rcriive Plan ArnendlAtiti Approval (b CPA.-;2019-0009. 1)ropnstild 2019 Cc.r,r,preb.ensive Plan OIT1CACI.1-.1CiiC CPA-2019-0009 is consistiitir wi The Fi.o.a:s and i aL icju a I tLia CotriprcihezislnFkr. . and will proir_otc ILC iihIir heath:„safety, and protection of the environir:ont. D. Reci.msnindation: The Valley 131.aiiiilyr (..:01nrnission recommends the City Council approve proposed 2019 Coicii:c:: :i ;in Pan Lair cal ii'. CPA-2019-0009. Approved this 14'1'day of March, 2019. Matt',Walton, Vice Chairman ATTEST Deanna Horton, P1analng Commission secretary Planning Commission Find[Jigs and Recommendation CPA-20194309 Page 3 of:t 1'I NI I)1\C;S A 't7 Ilz.l.'t-,t p tiiNIFNE}•AT'[[?1'; O +TI-Ilft. SPOJ{:'\N]• V.A 'V 11 NNINaff; II'ORPROPOS ,1-) COMPREI-IENSI\'I; I'I:!l ti 'I It„".DiYi EN.I'S CI -2Oi 9.Otifl,t. CI'A..20l 9-0005, CPA-2-019-0006, 019-0006, (.1'A-2019-0007,CPA-..019-00o8, FLLLd t.'I"A-2019-0010 It•lareh 14. 2019 A. 1}[10.:171 011(id: 1. I. ' ;; IE,ii c V:lIe c °[:n11:rr.hl r1i. i l.I: I{'t,I:11irc h.-I,siv''. Plan) includes an annual "111:4..[1 slh -'ll' "ti Glc til ,Ins t1171IL hlo' "" , 1' of the fo]low it Oscar, 11:0.4' . _....., prior to November typically winlln/arl : with. I:r a decision by City Council typically i`I late ;]al;rl *Ie rly sr .IL]!ll_r. q 2, For the 2019 Coinorulionsive Plan anli. a.;n�.]':Ir:na t cycle, the City reee!..L'U three priveltcly init'tited Icc]uests for Co1n1'+x:'111. n4L'•.!C I'I 1 > inendillie111.ti, ']esifna?ed as CPA- 2 J 19-000"; CPA-2019-0002, and and ono C:it4r :I.itietcd 21n' I:(1;11'�IT C i A.-2019-1)009, Si:Cit approved fol.. ; 1.C71ll p:e]i.'i I .- ° Kul ant ateIi' receive class-iflcatlon cn:Lslslen, v.'ith 111,', new i :](I 11 '..` tilcsl J?iYllllll `I .1r City )[dialed six Co1n'111re'Lf:Ias:4''v Plan '.ax airiciiditicists, 1liC- ndra ants arc consik,ren conct.rrently and Cilia LII eiv ly regard!1,E, i:otctitlit. suriai to RCW 16-')0A.1 i O1i?)(b). B. Finding Pursuant to Spoka::e Valley MunitipEl[ Code(S 'MC) 17.80.140(11), the Planning Commission likes inc IcIlowing findings ivit:-, re`;Ird tot ('PA-2019-0004, CPA-2019-00D5,CPA-2019-0006, CPA-2019-001)7, CPA-20:9-0008,ia::L7 (.•)A-r015-001 O: I. The City proposes to amend text in Chanters and 3 rof-Liie Comprehensive I'lr Li, update reco]rlrmended pedestrian and bicycle 11c:1'A,ork Ln:Ips iL7+ ))Ante)- m,'amid add appendices. Proposed amendments to C'h;mp:er ? illcicle 1`nli'.}and str LC(a y Lair lis to reflect J'laliricc] ' ::icn Crtlirrance prajectt, in,and rrrnuncl theN'.rilhLir:t 'n Llstiial Arca,(-ildi1,C5 10 annexation policy and Jhangcs to strLtegic actions irr( `1,:I x--2r 2.. Updates to C::i:intL:;'5 rcfloct ]-tela{]-:•OC','!]}1eicc] projects no. lil.:-',31'111O:ii!1{';1119175 . ItiL`[ C'i i7Lliha iiivolYC111e]ll ti:id first tcclltiictt[ evaluation. ^7';c first l71'tll,;c,lswl tt4,1'c:l''I r 7J Cl II!i:i !l]:IIlli l),Y set of 3:11 n1i1:1r,and the secoliCl a pp_'ndix provides a 20.yearIliJ :::oIL t ii ii 1111:?1'o'vc.niclir `;iris{_ i]I'TIP. i:S:L:lei:ll tl'ill'1`i]5C11't3tia 1 Ia11p overncnty Cllr;:3i 20-','(e:'.1' Ii:'I'1;aim Int 1Siaalt E th'e 4Q;lti- l::-ttviroomei tai 1' "I L' :i, :i! ]lil4'-r *5 .;I'.: I l �ti ,; 1'rr' j, rck. 1 ;t1e 21 SV MC,ar_ Crrlfirii:)mental checklist was required for the proposed Coin prci.'urlsivc: Han mai,: 311ne:id nient. 3. skii-reviewed the e.iviranlnenlai 'eIical iis', and a threshold determination was made for the prnp1 ccl ty.ulrip;ehcnsive Plan anic•ndi i iir . A 1 eleriniriation of No:°-tiignifcance (DNS) \vas issued for each of the proposed Conlprcll ,nsiea flan trnerdineltts on Fa,I.ruary 15, 2019. I. -I`lie Plan.-.1[11g Commission finds the procedural I'cqui;'mtiuents of SEPA and Title 2] SVIV1C have been fulfili'Ltcl. 5. SVMC l7.$0.140 provides the rcquirerne.nt:; tar Lie Cort]preiler]sivc, 13i-an <_nicndment precess, Lnellydlll Iliyl)11c: participtL oil, notiCc and :)t:C?ILIA llC!ari11g .c-cll]ircl:ac:1TS. 6. On F•'L:IiniT.,,,: ,ti, 21. ISI and February i'S, 2.019,notice for the proposed ainendinents Wel' puhli-10.1 in t: c. ,tir•:: {,_ane Valiey News Herald, 7. i°Il. 15 t~,1,:; .:d arnerdrnents are primari'y policy-a:iented and did not rctrrire individual rStiiiI::s` ;:5 property C1wi:eis or"No ica. of PLLblic fearing" s;`�rnige at specific sites. 'I`Ilt: I ;Ilnir] Colnlnis io:t reviewed the proposed u:ncncdmeiiI. to evaluate the Llrnli.ati.A,t, impacts CCnsistcnt with iz['W 36.70A.I30(2)(b;.. The tav'iew was consistent :'L:, 1;rl,row inh!.ir:),Eur:l3nlfs,l c.ICe::.'rrrlllellllt:len(:]'"1-:,ql'?'X004-COOS,n rid CPA-2419.LJO1p t`8scIof4 111,7acinnal amenclim[..-. SVMC 17..84.140 and chapter 36.74A • (Cixorvtli mar.:,42,Elnen[ 9. (7';11:•:Thriciry 211., 2019, the 1.)epartni.21-il cif Commerce was provided a nolic.r: ofintent tilt,' Cornprebentiive III On mary 28„ 2019 (he Cumrnissior held a p :1:31ic hearing or CPA-2019- -701 CPI\-2 t:10-047.06, CPA-2019-00n, CP A-20 I'."-0008, 11 A i72-: teztisnony,the Planning Coairnisiii C.1:.1.;!:.71 :17 p1.117 I i •:.[1211beriliOnS• 1 iLL ribliC health, and po'rci; 11 ..1,1 1 be served the propo...-;e(l Emr,,ndrrienis by ensuring that die c..),: 1-,r1..:Iti;sive Han eon:Iitlails and iqo ferenoes of tii[:°:conan-A:nii ,as ver11. LTSAITillg COTT'. rtcy Mai regional. policy and oilier adop[ed fiLarb. 2.. The propos;.:(1 airclii(lincrits to the Com prthensive bii Ufl iiai 1 Lirowth PkariaL...ement Aci (Cr clAer 36.70A kCI.V. GMA gccis wool 1 be net os veI a pifc.i tic Cempre,fieitti-ve Plan Goals aid rnclici..es fret: Encourage efilcieril ITII lc inti.")tiill tr2nsnortauori tl"atare based on coordina:c.::: with.Ltopitty and Lt y J.14 . a. CPA-20 P,;:-()Ii04: UpdaiCing imi)leinc:leatipostrai:-.1t!Ns and tivi-Kiliaes, .1. Economic Dev,,doppierii: Support cfpol.ipii:_ies and irip:oyinp.rif i.rrov,rEi for Spokane. V id Ley. thaf land riso inti, reg,nlations,review prooes_Fies,and iiiliT,stim:Ao,:c iiOrOVei1C.itCArpr<irt r'zo1-.0];11c.: gry.0,11 ;cid ni. Transportation: 4_-riSt10:t•111:::,l.the trarispertal:oli i in transporlation in Ina,:truclum are designed to irtipr...,vt!. (ItLii illy of life or ijc.-velopment • l-lousing: Allow for A broad range of housing opportunities to meet the of the(7-oninntwity. v. ikusiug: 1 : bI .lii dt ye IriL1L1u of-,.7.froi.tiable housing for all income levels. VL.. Housing: Allow to ;Lily goods and services in Spokane Valley's nci 'no:toads. br. CPA-20 I 9.0005: upd2t..7,s to pcde,;trion and bicycle elements, i. :I: Maintain aEid enhance a'comprehensive multirnodal transportation sy:-;ii.pri that Droinotes,supports.,and improves the safe, efik,Len(, and rd inhie 111w/el:Lent people, vehicles,and goods. c. CPA-2019-0006: Avcrw.xion -an:j oIic.y addiLiorts- i. Land Use: rrt .fide Rm. land that are essential to Spokane Valley 'and visitors. ii, Land Urr.:11re Lind rise plallS, rep,olations, review processes,and iiiill ,,irtiottire economic growth and vitality. d. CPA-2019-0007: Recommender] no work nrapiipdtitcs. Trans)oill:itio;t: Ensure that the traosporiatiori system and investments in 11:;•-iportati:J;. -ilfrastructunare du..:Epriod to improve quality of life or s11pi:or! xcrLomie rlY,nslic,vfli:I.on planning efforts reflect laud use 'N111(42:711; arid suppor'. o)portunities. 9.1%.1:'!°•;:ial:ttion: Provide lo.r!:',. re,and Lill-icier-it Ii iVlaintain and e7w1;iric.i.r.• i comprdlonsIvn irpoli[titodal (liar prOiii0TCS,.-ArFAM1S, irripp.-rvos the.safe, EM,veL11RI:11. Ot.:rcoplx, vehicles, and goods. e. Aprcuji.Y..of mosi p,dopied maps. EL Land H hat li i1 tise plans, regulations,review processes,and infrestriK:',1::„ I p-,ovemc::Li:, support economic growth and vitality. ':"Iiii!jr17.7,7nd 20 19'•7.C.U+1-0(..e.k:, F:?"..-2(0 19.l1l110 Nip 2(11'4 f. l',...•-••fr•:„)19-0010- 20-yen; '..!•ansoortation improvement plan. rat LOO: !'..,-1!••iwe that t:te transportation system and investinerAs in tation fl (ICSIWICEI to improve,quality of life or economic ,Ic.:velopment ii. TrAft-ipartation: lilts',Erc that ,trarisnortation 1:•, anficip..i.1,..•:•:i land tise patterns and y upport P7ovide for safc• efficicni freight moHii W. Transroatior. Nininiain and unli.arte(... a comprehensive mulrinioda I trairTur Labia: ,,iys[crri that proTotcs, suppoi improves the safe, efficient,and reliable mo veined-it of people,. vdticics. arid goods. 3, r.ic proposed i=i111(711(1111erit does not respond to a substantial ell:Ai-12,e in conditinns beyond thi2. priper::..• !I. The pre:)iiscr.i a•-imndments not I. Thc does mil IL :orwrehensive aree..ti ;tress itiid ::•••••el n Al Ilk': I I IC h ,iicril. ••,•! 0,111 in...livid' 1•1._i•ae projcic• loiviirtl LL i. C. Factors: The uffect upon the 1-Physical II Vhf 'Hese [ex( arnendE7ienis strategies and network-level pIiiiii rather thaniiLStU- I)eCJti i .Iyi vill IQ .i.,-.1(11-it..ssed as indi.,•••iLltial :)!Pr.:I.'1!; r CPL121:1 ;1).1-War- TI1C 121IC421 on open LliLN't rivut.s,,and In Ices: The 1)1-4. --..!;L:d ar.• 1)01.ky oriented aid .i no Oirec-, iuiipt an opc,1 The ronipatibility vi,itti arid impart (in Lind uses fittii riciOihntliCOtts: 7:71u7. c.,{4:oI/RH .ja a City- cid . bis through ca.pitElJi. l [• hRLsivePlan ensure that theCii acle.qiialc!iy providing for the •: iiiie.:patee i recommend context- ',sensitive i•eciestrian and bicycle ::.•twork .rapreveme.iisL y :ocnLiom.arid !.:,•pc,s respond to de.si illution and ..i.scs aid aLcomnnoclating travel behaviors based on street and adjacent dci-velopmein. Gliaracteristics, The benefit to tire noir!'borliooil, City, :ind region: The public banfi is rcrthered by ere.--dir.np, the Co,-,ttpreiterisive Nan is roflective of regionai policy and current with other internal 5. The quantity incI location of laud planned far the proposed land use type and density arid the dern arid for such Lind: The proposed aniea .inknits arc policy oriented and do nut direct impact on tho quantity olid location of land piaimcd for land uses, "f he current arid projected population cleiiNny in the proposed anymdinents do not rei,Luiri, population analysis, 7, The effect upon other aspects of the Compruliviisive Plan! The proposed amendments are consistent with itiAe ConTreacnsive 11:.1; v,illluve minimal impact on other a•.: ••,,R-21.12-,.: of the Plan. • C. ennetusinni: ' • The PlanninLc,Coitirnission find eotnplianLe with SVuIC 1, I 400 Comprehersi ye. Nail Ame•itdrnent Apit•rovai Criteria rci- CPA-7.0[9-0094: CPA-2019-0005, CPA-20 I 9-D0o6, CPA- 2019-000.Y, CrA,2019-0008, and CPA-2C.119-00]1]. 1),:oposod 2019 Co.-npreliensive Phu an-iondinents CPA.20 9-0004,CPA-20 9-0095, CIJA-20 I 9-0006, 0.:1).A..-20 i 9-0007. CPA-201,9- C017i111011 inilinF,5 and ReL:AwnendatianCrA- 019-:iadi-Alit:, id CPA-M19.0010 ['age]of 000 , ;lyl"I ('1-A,2019-0010 .i;'(: coo j jlt rpt v:i'1b tL1C C*eals and orthe Comprehensive Plan, ani: �w i11 i)rnllio:c :he pEi'Dlis licah l,, s:1 '.y',wel iris'.:, and pr.atecrion of the environment, D. 1Lccolr mcil[l:ttion: The Spoki u- Vallcy PIan:1i:1 }: C ):!tllhi i')I icc'.onin.(,ds the City Council approve proposed 2019 Comprehensive nut aTw.rdiI rs -2019-00U,1-, LPA-2019-10005,CPA-2019-00061 CPA- 2019-0007,CPA-2019-0003, ritid CPA-20[9-0010. Approved this 146 day of March,2019. [Matt Walton,Vice Chairman ATTEST Deanna l-lorbri,Planning Commission Secrelsry Planning,Commission Findires end Rectinmcndation CPA•71319%.0 :14-0006,and CP A-2{]I9-001.0 Page 4014 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: April 16, 2019 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ® admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: CERB Planning Grant—Appleway Trail Economic Development Study GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 36.70A — City of Spokane Valley has adopted a comprehensive plan and is in compliance with the Growth Management Act. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: None BACKGROUND: The Community Economic Revitalization Board (CERB) is a division of the Washington State Department of Commerce that focuses on investments in local public infrastructure projects supporting private business growth and expansion. CERB accepts local applications for loans and grant funds in support of both planning and construction activities. CERB's Planning Grant program offers up to $25,000 to local agencies to conduct feasibility and planning work that furthers economic development initiatives. This program requires a minimum local match of twenty-five percent (25%) of the awarded grant amount. If the City were awarded the CERB Planning Grant, the match would be $6,250. The application deadline for the Planning Grant program is May 27, 2019. If awarded, the study would assess feasibility, design considerations and potential mechanisms for supporting private business improvements along the Appleway Trail corridor. Examples of such improvements might include orienting façade improvements toward the trail, installing temporary improvements such as seating or landscaping adjacent to or within the trail, and wayfinding signage or establishing accessible physical connections between private properties and the trail. Resulting recommendations would identify strategies to support positive business growth and economic development along the Appleway Trail. This study would further implement strategies for retail improvement. OPTIONS: Discussion RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Seeking Council consensus to proceed with the application for CERB Planning Grant funding as listed in Table 1 below. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: If awarded project funding, the City match requirement of 25% would amount to $6,250. The Economic Development Division's 2019 budget has sufficient funds to cover the local match. Table 1 Est. Total Cost CERB Funds City Funds Project Estimate $31,250 $25,000 $6,250 STAFF CONTACT: Mike Basinger, AICP, Economic Development Manager ATTACHMENTS: PowerPoint Presentation Community Economic Revitalization Board (CERB) Grant Opportunity Appleway Trail Economic Development Study Administrative Report April 16, 2019 Mike Basinger, AICP CITY OF Economic Development Manager Spokane Valley CERB Program Details Program Timeframe Eligible $ Est. City Award Planning Grant 2019-2021 $25,000 $25,000 • First round for applications opened April 1st • Applications are due May 27th 1• �, Awards are decided at July 18th Board meeting Future applications are accepted on a rolling basis, approximately every two months ECONOMIC REVITALIZATION CM CID 2 Appleway Trail Economic Development Study CERB Funding Request: $ 25 ,000 7 'y fi e r• _� V , City Match : $6, 250 (25%) II '_ ic. ,,. .:41. t , ira ti- Scope of work: T_ • Identify opportunities to support business growth .. ' N, 41, 1P�„- Physical connections Temporary improvements % N.A. :• ,,... ` '` l Wayfinding signage \ 4 Design considerations *M wt ovi hi,''v' r 1• 3 - . - - i ` __ _ 1 f c'.4 t 9- t, • • ,,, 1 - ''''' t:';'1/4 - ltiA;t,f..34(,•Z •"", 3. '' ' 74 ..". - .__ ._----.-----,... _-__ _ _ r e .mom =_ - - . ...,- - ,_ - .. ... _ 41# • 11) _ . ... . ., ____. . uestions . .._. . .._ . , , _ ._ . 4 DRAFT ADVANCE AGENDA as of April 11,2019; 10:00 a.m. Please note this is a work in progress; items are tentative To: Council& Staff From: City Clerk,by direction of City Manager Re: Draft Schedule for Upcoming Council Meetings April 23,2019,Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Tue April 161 Proclamation: Older American's Month;Lemonade Day 1. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 2.Motion Consideration: Bid Award,Evergreen Crossing,Mission to Indiana—John Hohman (10 minutes) 3.Motion Consideration: Bid Award,Midilome Neighborhood St.Imp. Project-John Hohman (10 minutes) 4.Motion Consideration: Bid Award,Barker Road Widening—John Hohman (10 minutes) 5. Admin Report: Plantes Ferry Sports Complex Renovation—John Hohman; Doug Chase (60 minutes) 6. Admin Report: Police Department Quarterly Report—Chief Werner (10 minutes) 7. Admin Report: Advance Agenda—Mayor Higgins (5 minutes) 8. Info Only: Department Reports [*estimated meeting: 110 mins] April 30,2019, Study Session, 6:00 p.m. [due Tue April 23 1 ACTION ITEMS: 1. Motion Consideration: Bid Award, Garland Avenue Extension Project—Gloria Mantz (5 minutes) 2.Motion Consideration: Adoption of Federal Legislative Agenda—M.Calhoun,J.Hohman, C.Driskell(10 min) NON-ACTION ITEMS: 3. Admin Report: City Hall and Police Precinct generators update—Bill Helbig (10 minutes) 4. Duplex Density Code Text Amendment 2018-0005—Lori Barlow (15 minutes) 5. Park Road Reconstruction Project Update—Gloria Mantz (30 minutes) 6. Advance Agenda—Mayor Higgins (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting: 75 mins] May 7,2019, Study Session,6:00 p.m. [due Tue April 30 1. Advance Agenda—Mayor Higgins (5 minutes) May 14,2019,Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Tue May 71 1. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 2. First Reading Ordinance, Comp Plan Amendments—Lori Barlow, Mike Basinger (20 minutes) 3. Admin Report: Advance Agenda—Mayor Higgins (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting: 30 mins] May 21,2019, Study Session,6:00 p.m. [due Tue May 141 1. Draft 2020-2025 Six-Year TIP—Adam Jackson (20 minutes) 2. Advance Agenda—Mayor Higgins (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting: 25 mins] May 28,2019,Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Tue May 211 1. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 2. Second Reading Ordinance, Comp Plan Amendments—Lori Barlow,Mike Basinger (10 minutes) 3. Admin Report: Advance Agenda—Mayor Higgins (5 minutes) 4. Info Only: Department Reports [*estimated meeting: mins] Draft Advance Agenda 4/11/2019 1:37:18 PM Page 1 of 2 June 4,2019, Study Session,6:00 p.m. [due Tue May 281 ACTION ITEMS: 1.Public Hearing: 2020-2025 Six-Year TIP—Adam Jackson (15 minutes 2. Resolution Adopting 2020-2025 Six Year Tip—Adam Jackson(no public comment) (5 minutes) NON-ACTION ITEMS: 3. Advance Agenda—Mayor Higgins (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting: mins] June 11,2019, Special Meeting: 2020 Budget Workshop, 8:30 a.m.—2:30 p.m., fdue Tue June 41 June 11, 2019, 6 pm formal meeting cancelled June 18,2019, Study Session, 6:00 p.m. [due Tue June 11] 1. Advance Agenda—Mayor Higgins (5 minutes) AWC Annual Conference:June 25-28 Spokane Convention Center June 25,2019,Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. [due Tue June 18] 1. Advance Agenda—Mayor Higgins (5 minutes) 2. Info Only: Department Reports July 2,2019, Study Session,6:00 p.m. [due Tue June 25] 1. Advance Agenda—Mayor Higgins (5 minutes) July 9,2019,Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. [due Tue July 21 Proclamation: Parks and Recreation Month 1. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 2. Admin Report: Advance Agenda—Mayor Higgins (5 minutes) July 16,2019, Study Session,6:00 p.m. [due Tue July 9] 1. Advance Agenda—Mayor Higgins (5 minutes) July 23,2019,Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Tue July 161 1. Advance Agenda—Mayor Higgins (5 minutes) 2. Info Only: Department Reports July 30,2019, Study Session,6:00 p.m. [due Tue July 23] 1. Advance Agenda—Mayor Higgins (5 minutes) *time for public or Council comments not included OTHER PENDING AND/OR UPCOMING ISSUES/MEETINGS: Appleway Trail Amenities St. Illumination(ownership,cost,location) Camping in RVs St. O&M Pavement Preservation Donation Recognition Studded Snow Tires Graffiti Utility Facilities in ROW Health District Re SV Stats Water Districts& Green Space Land Use Notice Requirements Way Finding Signs Mirabeau Park Forestry Mgmt. Naming City Facilities Protocol Park Lighting Park Regulations Ordinance Amendments PFD Presentation Police Dept. Quarterly Rpt(Jan,April,July, Oct) Sign Ordinance Snow Removal: Streets& Sidewalks Draft Advance Agenda 4/11/2019 1:37:18 PM Page 2 of 2 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: April 16, 2019 Department Director Approval Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation ® executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: EXECUTIVE SESSION: Review Performance of a Public Employee GOVERNING LEGISLATION: [RCW 42.30.110(1)(g)] PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: BACKGROUND: OPTIONS: RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: "I Move that Council adjourn into executive session for approximately sixty minutes to review the performance of a public employee, and that no action will be taken upon return to open session." BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: STAFF CONTACT: ATTACHMENTS: