Loading...
2019, 06-04 Study SessionAGENDA SPOKANE VALLEY CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION FORMAT Tuesday, June 4, 2019 6:00 p.m. CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10210 E Sprague Avenue (Please Silence Your Cell Phones During the Meeting) CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL APPROVAL OF AGENDA ACTION ITEMS: 1. PUBLIC HEARING: 2020-2025 Six Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP)— Adam Jackson 2. Resolution 19-008 Adopting the 2020-2025 Six Year TIP — Adam Jackson 3. CONSENT AGENDA: consists of items considered routine which are approved as a group. Any member of Council may ask that an item be removed from the Consent Agenda to be considered separately. Proposed Motion: I move to approve the Consent Agenda. a. Approval of claim vouchers on June 4, 2019 Request for Council Action Form Total: $274,017.37 b. Approval of May 15, 2019 Council Meeting Minutes, Special meeting c. Approval of May 21, 2019 Council Meeting Minutes, Study Session 4. Second Reading Ordinance 19-006, Second Amendment to 2019 Budget — Chelsie Taylor 5. First Reading Ordinance 19-007 Amending Addressing Standards — Karen Kendall 6. Motion Consideration: BUILD 2019 Grant Potential — Adam Jackson [public comment] NON -ACTION ITEMS: DISCUSSION LEADER SUBJECT/ACTIVITY GOAL 7. Erica Amsden, Gloria Mantz Pines Grade Separation Project Discussion/Information Design Alternatives 8. Rob Lochmiller, Gloria Mantz Appleway Trail Project, Evergreen Discussion/Information To Sullivan, Update 9. Tija Danzig, Homeless & `Point in Time' Count 2019 Discussion/Information Rehousing Program Manager 10. Mayor Higgins Advance Agenda Discussion/Information 11. Mayor Higgins Council Check in Discussion/Information 12. Mark Calhoun City Manager Comments Discussion/Information ADJOURN Study Session Agenda, June 4, 2019 Page 1 of 1 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: June 4, 2019 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ® public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Public Hearing: Draft 2020-2025 Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 35.77.010, Perpetual advanced six-year plans for coordinated transportation program expenditures. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Annual adoption of the TIP, and its amendments. BACKGROUND: The TIP is composed of transportation projects intended to be implemented in the next six years that address the transportation needs within the City of Spokane Valley. The City is required by RCW 35.77.010 to prepare and, after holding a public hearing, adopt a comprehensive transportation program for the ensuing six calendar years. This plan must be submitted to the Washington State Department of Transportation by June 30th of each year. The attached six-year TIP presents an integrated approach to project selection and phasing that has been aligned with recent master plans, upcoming redevelopment projects, economic development efforts, land use changes, stormwater and water district plans, and capital projects by partner agencies. The six-year TIP is required to be financially constrained. Currently the six-year TIP may exceed financial expectations; however, it does accurately reflect the City's short-term transportation needs and provides a prioritized path forward. OPTIONS: Conduct Public Hearing RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Conduct Public Hearing BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: The required City match on federal and state funded projects is typically between 10% and 20%. A review of projected REET funds through 2025 will be provided to determine if there are sufficient funds to provide the City's match for the recommended projects. STAFF CONTACT: Adam Jackson, P.E. — Planning & Grants Engineer ATTACHMENTS: PowerPoint Presentation 2020-2025 Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) June 4, 2019 Adam Jackson, P.E. - Planning & Grants Engineer Spokane Dalley Transportation Improvement Program Purpose: Required by RCW 35.77.010 Must be referenced in Comp Plan Required for REET expenditures Required for grant eligibility The Program An integrated approach that aligns: Master plans and studies, Upcoming redevelopment projects, Economic development efforts, Land use changes, Stormwater projects, Capital projects by partner agencies. (63 Total Projects) 2019-2020 Closeout Projects (14 Projects) 1 el 11. Wellesley Ave. Sidewalk I 5. Knox Ave. Sidewalk 10. Mission Sidewalk & Preservation Argonne Road Preservation: 8. Broadway to Mission 9. Valleyway to Broadway 14. 2019 SCWD #3 Street Preservation. 12. Wilbur Road Sidewalk 7. University Road Preservation 2. Barker Road — Euclid to Grade Separation Project 4. Garland Avenue — Flora to Barker 6. Barker/I-90 Interchange Design 1. Appleway Trail — Evergreen to Sullivan 13. 2019 Local Access Streets (Midilome) 0 .800 7.600 16,200 ;,800 Fet 1 1 1 1 All projects assume 2% of the construction phase is carried over from 2019 into 2020. 4 Bridge & Grade Separation Projects (5 Projects) 17. Pines Road/BNSF Grade Separation Project 57. Sullivan Road/Trent Interchange Reconstruction 16. Barker Road/BNSF Grade Separation Project 29. Sullivan Road Bridge Deck Resurfacing 51. Argonne Road/I-90 Bridge Widening 0 2.1..50 4.300 8.700 12.900 Feat 1 i 1 i 1 i 1 5 Intersection Improvement Projects 18. Sullivan & Wellesley 58. Sullivan & Kiernan (15 Projects) 56. Flora & Trent 15. North Sullivan Road ITS Will Project 28. Park & Mission 59. Sullivan & Marietta 61. Barker & Boone 47. Mirabeau & Mansfield 32. Pines & Mission 36. Sprague & Barker 41. 8th & Carnahan 54. 8th & Park 50. Cataldo Ave. Realignment at Barker Road 45. 8th & Barker 60. Pines & 16th .800 7,600 1E.200 22.800 Flet Reconstruction/Preservation Projects 42. Argonne Road — Indiana to Montgomery 23. Indiana — Evergreen to Sullivan (17 Projects) 49. Flora Rd — Euclid to Garland 53. Park Road — Valleyway to Trent 62. Broadway Ave. — Flora to Barker 37. Mission Ave. — Mullan to University 22. Broadway Ave. — Havana to Fancher 46. Mullan Road — Broadway to Mission 30. Evergreen Road — Sprague to Mission 24. 8th Ave. — Progress to Sullivan 38. Sullivan — Sprague to South City Limit 44. 32nd Ave — Pines to SR 27 35. Barker Rd — Spokane River to Euclid 63. Barker Rd — Mission to 1-90 Barker Road Corridor: 48. 1-90 to Appleway 52. Appleway to City Limit Citywide Projects (5 Projects) 25. Street Preservation Projects - Annual L ! -;q 26. Local Access Street Improvement Projects - Annual r� - •r 0 3,500 7,000 14,000 21,040 Feet. - I i I I I • ?y Legend CPCI_17 Poor Falr Legend CPCI_17 - Poor Falr - Good 27. Citywide Safety Projects - Biennial 33. Citywide Reflective Post Panels L r— Th-i— • 34. Citywide Reflective Signal Plates ar1o6Feet r5' • • 6 • s rj1 L 4 .! Lr'' i• • t • i ❑ • • 0 4rr••N• r• ° 1 B • M M• M• MOO OW H • NO r * a • z . ❑ MN• - • vrw1r r M acct•° •-- s U&D 0 3,350 6,700 13400 2"*,100710 Legend ❑ Priorityl_StopSigns • 35MPH_Prioriryl_Signs • Priority2_StopSigns Legend • Cilywide Signal Backplales - Safety Priority 1 Streets - Safety Priorily 2 Streets 8 Sidewalk, Trail, and Stormwater Projects (7 Projects) 21. Ella Sidewalk — Broadway to Alki 40. Wilbur Sidewalk — Boone to Mission 39. Sprague Stormwater — Park to University 20. Conklin Sidewalk — Appleway Trail to Riceland Ln. 31. Appleway Stormwater — Farr to University 55. Appleway Trail — Dishman Mica to University 19. Adams Sidewalk — 16th to 22nd 2.12E 4.2E0 8. En0 . 12.750 Feet - 1 1 i 1 i-. 1 ..-.__. Questions CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: June 4, 2019 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ® new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Proposed Resolution 19-008: Adoption of the 2020-2025 Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 35.77.010, Perpetual advanced six-year plans for coordinated transportation program expenditures. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Annual adoption of the TIP, and its amendments. BACKGROUND: The TIP is composed of transportation projects intended to be implemented in the next six years that address the transportation needs within the City of Spokane Valley. The City is required by RCW 35.77.010 to prepare and, after holding a public hearing, adopt a comprehensive transportation program for the ensuing six calendar years. This plan must be submitted to the Washington State Department of Transportation by June 30th of each year. The attached six-year TIP presents an integrated approach to project selection and phasing that has been aligned with recent master plans, upcoming redevelopment projects, economic development efforts, land use changes, stormwater and water district plans, and capital projects by partner agencies. The six-year TIP is required to be financially constrained. Currently the six-year TIP may exceed financial expectations; however, it does accurately reflect the City's short-term transportation needs and provides a prioritized path forward. Updates from the May 21, 2019 Administrative Report include two projects: 1) addition of pavement preservation on 32nd Avenue from Pines to SR 27, and 2) revising the Park Road project scope to include sidewalk improvements along select segments of the project limits. OPTIONS: Adopt the 2020-2025 Six -Year TIP as presented or take other action. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to approve Resolution 19-008, adopting the 2020-2025 Six -Year TIP as presented. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: The required City match on federal and state funded projects is typically between 10% and 20%. A review of projected REET funds through 2025 will be provided to determine if there are sufficient funds to provide the City's match for the recommended projects. STAFF CONTACT: Adam Jackson, P.E. — Planning & Grants Engineer ATTACHMENTS: Resolution 19-008 2020-2025 Six -Year TIP Report DRAFT CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. 19-008 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING THE 2020-2025 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, AND OTHER MATTERS RELATING THERETO. WHEREAS, to provide for the proper and necessary development of the street system within the City of Spokane Valley, the City shall, as required by State law, develop and adopt annually a Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program (Six -Year TIP) with such program acting as a guide for the coordinated development of the City's transportation system; and WHEREAS, the Six -Year TIP of the City shall specifically set forth those projects and programs of both City and regional significance that benefit the transportation system and promote public safety and efficient vehicle movements; and WHEREAS, the Six -Year TIP shall be consistent with the City Comprehensive Plan and be adopted following one or more public hearings before the City Council; and WHEREAS, a draft copy of the Six -Year TIP was submitted to the Washington State Department of Commerce and has been reviewed and approved prior to the scheduled adoption of the TIP in accordance with RCW 36.70A.106; and WHEREAS, the City Council conducted a public hearing on June 4, 2019 for the purpose of inviting and receiving public comment on the proposed Six -Year TIP. NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley, Spokane County, Washington, as follows: Section 1. The City Council hereby adopts the attached Six -Year TIP for the City of Spokane Valley for the purpose of guiding the design, development and construction of local and regional transportation improvements for the years 2020 through 2025. The City Clerk is directed to file the 2020- 2025 Six -Year TIP with the Washington State Secretary of Transportation before June 30, 2019. The Six - Year TIP shall be reviewed at least annually for the purpose of determining the work to be accomplished under the program and the City transportation requirements. Projects and timeframes identified in the Six -Year TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, and are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions. Section 2. Effective Date. This Resolution shall be in full force and effect upon adoption. Adopted this 4th day of June, 2019. ATTEST: City of Spokane Valley Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk L.R. Higgins, Mayor Approved as to Form: Office of the City Attorney Resolution 19-008, Adopting Six -Year TIP Spokane'�� jUalley 2020 - 2025 Six Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) City of Spokane Valley Community & Public Works Department 2020-2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Funding Sources: • City • CDBG • CMAQ • COM • DEV • FHWA • FMSIB • FTA • HSIP • NHFP • Other • RCO • REET • RR • SRTS • SW • STA • STBG • STBG-SA • TIB • TIGER • WAL • WSDOT Glossary & Abbreviations City Funds Community Development Block Grant Congestion Management/Air Quality Washington Department of Commerce Private Developer Funds Federal Highway Administration Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board Federal Transit Authority Highway Safety Improvement Program National Highway Freight Program Misc. Unidentified Funding Sources Washington State Recreation Conservation Office Real Estate Excise Tax Railroad Safe Routes to School City Stormwater Funds Spokane Transit Authority Surface Transportation Block Grant Surface Transportation Block Grant — Set Aside Transportation Improvement Board Transportation Investment Generating Economic Recovery Washington Legislature Washington Department of Transportation Spokane 1Valley Project Phases: • PE Preliminary Engineering • RW Right -of -Way • CN Construction Zoninq R1 R2 R3 POS MF NC MU CMU RC IMU .000 Valle Project / Description / Current Status / Length Total 2020-2025 Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program Dollars in Thousands Funding Sources 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Total 1 Appleway Trail - Evergreen to Sullivan Description: Construct shared -use pathway along public utility corridor. Status: 2019 CN, 2020 Closeout. Length (miles) 1 45 City CMAQ STBG-SA 6 6 35 35 4 4 Funding Status: Secured PE RW Secured CN 45 0 0 45 Total 45 45 2 Barker Road Improvement - Euclid to Grade 46 City Separation Project Description: Reconstruct Barker to 3 -lane urban section with shared -use path in partnership with Spokane County Sewer Extension. Status: 2019 CN, 2020 Closeout. Length (miles) 0.7 46 46 Funding Status: Secured PE Secured RW Secured CN 46 0 0 46 Total 46 46 3 Evergreen Road Resurfacing - Mission Connector to Indiana Description: Pavement preservation project. Status: 2019 CN, 2020 Closeout. Length (miles) 0.5 12 City STBG 2 2 10 10 Funding Status: Secured PE Secured RW Secured CN 12 0 0 12 Total 12 12 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances. 5/28/2019 Page 1 S"E I Y ane Val 1C' 2020-2025 Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program Dollars in Thousands Project / Description / Current Status / Length Total Funding Sources 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Total 4 Garland Avenue Extension Project Description: Construct 3 -lane urban section between Flora and Barker. Status: City to manage 2019 CN with 50% funds by Dev, 2020 Closeout. Length (miles) 1 60 City DEV 30 30 30 30 Funding Status: Secured PE Secured RW Secured CN 60 0 0 60 Total 60 60 5 Knox Avenue Sidewalk - Hutchinson to Sargent Description: Install curb, gutter, and sidewalk with stormwater improvements. Status: CDBG grant funding. 2019 CN, 2020 Closeout. Length (miles) 0.2 6 City CDBG 1 1 5 5 Funding Status: Secured PE Secured RW Secured CN 6 0 0 6 Total 6 6 6 Barker Road & 1-90 WB Interchange Description: Partnership with WSDOT for PE of westbound I-90/Barker interchange roundabout. Status: 2019 PE, 2020 Closeout. Future CN by WSDOT. Length (miles) 0 18 WSDOT 18 18 Funding Status: PE RW CN 18 18 0 0 Total 18 18 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances. 5/28/2019 Page 2 S"E I Y ane Val 1C' 2020-2025 Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program Dollars in Thousands Project / Description / Current Status / Length Total Funding Sources 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Total 7 University Road Preservation Project - 16th to Dishman Mica Description: Pavement preservation project. Status: 2019 CN, 2020 Closeout. Length (miles) 1 50 City TIB 10 10 40 40 Funding Status: Secured PE Secured RW Secured CN 50 0 0 50 Total 50 50 8 Argonne Road Preservation - Broadway to Mission Description: Pavement preservation project. Status: 2019 CN, 2020 Closeout. Length (miles) 0.8 15 City STP(U) 5 5 10 10 Funding Status: Secured PE Secured RW Secured CN 15 0 0 15 Total 15 15 9 Argonne Road Preservation - Valleyway to Broadway Description: Pavement preservation project. Status: 2019 CN, 2020 Closeout. Length (miles) 0.2 6 City 6 6 Funding Status: Secured PE RW Secured CN 6 0 0 6 Total 6 6 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances. 5/28/2019 Page 3 S"E I Y ane Val 1C' 2020-2025 Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program Dollars in Thousands Project / Description / Current Status / Length Total Funding Sources 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Total 10 Mission Avenue Sidewalk & Preservation 41 City TIB Description: Pavement preservation project from University to Union, provide new sidewalk from Bowdish to Union. Status: 2019 CN, 2020 Closeout. Length (miles) 0.8 8 8 33 33 Funding Status: Secured PE RW Secured CN 41 0 0 41 Total 41 41 11 Wellesley Avenue Sidewalk - McDonald to Evergreen Description: Install sidewalk from McDonald to Evergreen, with stormwater improvements as necessary. Status: 2019 CN, 2020 Closeout. Length (miles) 0.5 8 City SRTS 1 1 7 7 Funding Status: Secured PE Secured RW Secured CN 8 0 0 8 Total 8 8 12 Wilbur Road Sidewalk - Broadway to Boone Description: Install sidewalk from Broadway to Boone, with stormwater improvements as necessary. Status: 2019 CN, 2020 Closeout. Length (miles) 0.3 6 City CDBG 1 1 5 5 Funding Status: Secured PE Secured RW Secured CN 6 0 0 6 Total 6 6 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances. 5/28/2019 Page 4 2020-2025 Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program Dollars in Thousands Project / Description / Current Status / Length Total Funding Sources 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Total 13 2019 Local Access Streets (Midilome Neighborhood) Description: Full depth reclamation project. Limits are generally bound by 32nd Ave., Bowdish Rd., Pines Rd., and 37th Ave. Status: 2019 CN, 2020 Closeout. Length (miles) 2 31 City 31 31 Funding Status: Secured PE RW Secured CN 31 0 0 31 Total 31 31 14 2019 SCWD#3 Street Preservation Description: Spokane County Water District #3 partnership to pave full width segments of Valleyway, Farr, and Woodruff as part of water project. Status: 2019 CN, 2020 Closeout. Length (miles) 0 6 City 6 6 Funding Status: Secured PE RW Secured CN 6 0 0 6 Total 6 6 15 North Sullivan Road ITS Project Description: Extend Intelligent Transportation Systems conduit and controls along Sullivan Corridor. Status: 2020 CN & Closeout. Length (miles) 2 709 City CMAQ 96 96 613 613 Funding Status: Secured PE Secured RW Secured CN 709 0 0 709 Total 709 709 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances. 5/28/2019 Page 5 2020-2025 Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program Dollars in Thousands Funding Project / Description / Current Status / Length Total Sources 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Total 16 Barker Road / BNSF Grade Separation Project Description: Construct Grade Separation at Barker/BNSF RR/Trent (SR290). (Rounding errors present.) Status: Assumes 50% ROW in 2019. Length (miles) Intersection 22,425 City NHFP TIGER FMSIB WAL Other 1,210 1,210 1,210 3,630 2,000 2,000 2,000 6,000 1,179 2,034 2,034 2,034 7,281 1,667 1,667 1,667 5,001 145 145 68 100 100 100 368 Funding Status: Secured PE Secured RW Secured CN 119 1,273 7,010 7,010 7,010 119 1,273 21,030 Total 1,392 7,011 7,011 7,011 22,425 17 Pines Road (SR27) / BNSF Grade Separation Project Description: Construct Grade Separation at Pines/BNSF RR/Trent (SR290). Status: 50% PE in 2019. "Other" assumes 20% City match. Length (miles) Intersection 27,525 City STBG Other 1,250 1,155 1,155 883 1,766 1,766 7,975 945 945 1,890 3,532 7,064 7,064 17,660 Funding Status: Partial PE Partial RW Planned CN 1,250 2,100 2,100 1,250 4,200 4,415 8,830 8,830 22,076 Total 1,250 2,100 2,100 4,415 8,830 8,830 27,525 18 Sullivan Road / Wellesley Avenue Intersection 1,179 City Improvement CMAQ Description: Spo. Co. Traffic signal and intersection improvement project, partnership with Spokane County. Status: 2019 PE & ROW, 2020 CN, 2021 Closeout. Length (miles) Intersection 76 71 487 455 90 147 942 90 Funding Status: Secured PE Secured RW Secured CN 20 108 526 526 20 108 1,052 Total 653 526 1,179 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances. 5/28/2019 Page 6 Sane Vallt' 2020-2025 Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program Dollars in Thousands Project / Description / Current Status / Length Total Funding Sources 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Total 19 Adams Road Sidewalk Description: New sidewalk on the east side from 16th to 22nd. Status: 2019 PE, 2020 CN, 2021 Closeout. Length (miles) 0.4 445 City TIB 87 2 89 349 7 356 Funding Status: Secured PE RW Secured CN 16 420 9 16 0 429 Total 436 9 445 20 Conklin Road Sidewalk Description: New sidewalk on the west side from Appleway Trail to Riceland Lane. Status: 2019 PE, 2020 CN, 2021 Closeout. Length (miles) 0.0 76 City CDBG 8 8 67 1 68 Funding Status: Secured PE Secured RW Secured CN 74 2 0 0 76 Total 75 1 76 21 Ella Road Sidewalk Description: New sidewalk on the west side from Broadway Ave. to Alki Ave. Status: 2019 PE, 2020 CN, 2021 Closeout. Length (miles) 0.2 354 City CDBG 38 1 39 309 6 315 Funding Status: Secured PE Secured RW Secured CN 347 7 0 0 354 Total 347 7 354 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances. 5/28/2019 Page 7 S"E I Y ane 2020-2025 Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program Dollars in Thousands Project / Description / Current Status / Length Total Funding Sources 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Total 22 Broadway Avenue Preservation - Havana to Fancher Description: Pavement preservation, including stormwater improvements as necessary. Status: 2019 PE, 2020 CN. Possible funding via TIB or City Fund 311. Length (miles) 1 2,200 City Other 431 9 440 1,725 35 1,760 Funding Status: Secured PE Secured RW Planned CN 2,156 44 0 0 2,200 Total 2,156 44 2,200 23 Indiana Avenue Preservation - Evergreen to Sullivan Description: Pavement preservation project with stormwater and signal improvements as necessary. Status: 2019 PE, 2020 CN, 2021 Closeout. "Other" funding from TIB or City Fund 311. Length (miles) 0.9 1,910 City Other 382 8 390 1,490 30 1,520 Funding Status: Partial PE RW Planned CN 10 10 0 1,862 38 1,900 Total 1,872 38 1,910 24 8th Avenue Preservation - Progress to Sullivan Description: Potential partnership with Vera Water & Power for sidewalk extension on south side along frontage of Vera's property. Status: 2019 PE with City funds, potential Fund 311 project in future CN years. Length (miles) 0.2 655 City Other 578 12 590 64 1 65 Funding Status: Planned PE RW Planned CN 5 637 13 5 0 650 Total 642 13 655 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances. 5/28/2019 Page 8 SOokane 2020-2025 Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program Dollars in Thousands Project / Description / Current Status / Length Total Funding Sources 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Total 25 Street Preservation Projects - Annual Description: Pavement preservation projects citywide, typically arterials or collectors, or used as matching funds for grant programs. Status: For 2020 CN, preservation projects identified specifically in TIP. Projects include storm upgrades as applicable. Length (miles) Varies 18,000 City 3,600 3,600 3,600 3,600 3,600 18,000 Funding Status: Planned PE RW Planned CN 100 100 100 100 100 500 0 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 17,500 Total 3,600 3,600 3,600 3,600 3,600 18,000 26 Local Access Street Improvement Projects - Annual Description: Pavement projects funded by Street Wear Fee. Approx. $1.5M annually. Projects are assumed to not have any ROW required. Project type varies (surface treatments, grind/inlays, reconstruction). Status: Site selection is on-going. Actual locations to be determined. Length (miles) 9,000 City 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 9,000 Funding Status: Secured PE Secured RW Secured CN 100 100 100 100 100 100 600 0 1,400 1,400 1,400 1,400 1,400 1,400 8,400 Total 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 9,000 27 Citywide Safety Projects - Biennial Description: Federally funded calls -for -projects occuring in even -numbered years. Projects are assumed to be low-cost, citywide, systemic improvements but can also be larger spot -specific projects. 2020 projects listed specifically in TIP. (Rounding errors present.) Status: Costs assume project implementation in odd -number years and design/close-out in even -numbered years. 10% local match. Length (miles) 0 502 HSIP City 45 158 45 158 45 451 5 18 5 18 5 51 Funding Status: Planned PE RW Planned CN 5 18 5 18 5 50 0 45 158 45 158 45 450 Total 50 176 50 176 50 502 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances. 5/28/2019 Page 9 • ` Val 1tyT' 2020-2025 Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program Dollars in Thousands Project / Description / Current Status / Length Total Funding Sources 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Total 28 Park Road & Mission Avenue Intersection Improvement Description: Improve channelization and signal operations. Status: Length (miles) 0 1,700 City 1,700 1,700 Funding Status: Planned PE Planned RW Planned CN 100 100 60 60 1,540 1,540 Total 1,700 1,700 29 Sullivan Road Bridge Deck Resurfacing Description: Resurface existing bridge deck for Sullivan Road northbound over UPRR tracks. Status: Pending funding request to FHBP. Length (miles) 0 338 City Other Fed 9 36 45 59 234 293 Funding Status: Planned PE Planned RW Planned CN 68 270 68 0 270 Total 68 270 338 30 Evergreen Road Preservation - Sprague to Mission Description: Pavement preservation project. (Rounding errors present.) Status: 2020 PE, 2021 CN, 2022 Closeout. "Other" funding from TIB or City Fund 311. Length (miles) 0.9 1,501 Other City 58 1,120 23 1,201 14 280 6 300 Funding Status: Planned PE RW Planned CN 72 8 80 0 1,392 28 1,420 Total 72 1,400 29 1,501 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances. 5/28/2019 Page 10 Sane llt' 2020-2025 Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program Dollars in Thousands Project / Description / Current Status / Length Total Funding Sources 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Total 31 Appleway Boulevard Stormwater Improvements 1,000 Other State City Description: Improve stormwater facilities between University and Farr. Funded by Dept. of Ecology. Status: 2020 PE, 2021 CN, 2022 Closeout. 25% local match. Length (miles) 0.6 106 631 13 750 36 210 4 250 Funding Status: Secured PE Secured RW Secured CN 142 8 833 17 150 0 850 Total 142 841 17 1,000 32 Pines Road / Mission Avenue Intersection Improvement Description: A two -phased project with signal and channelization upgrades to improve capacity (Phase 1) and additional turn lanes on Pines (Phase 2). Status: Phase 1 funded by CMAQ for 2021 CN, potential for Developer funds via Mirabeau Subarea Traffic Study. Phase 2 is unfunded. Length (miles) Intersection 1,400 City CMAQ 11 68 69 440 109 188 703 1,212 Funding Status: Partial PE Partial RW Partial CN 80 10 498 120 210 32 32 660 1,158 Total 80 508 812 1,400 33 Citywide Reflective Post Panels Description: Installation of reflective post panels to stop signs and speed limit signs on select streets. (Rounding errors present.) Status: 2019 PE, 2020 CN, 2021 Closeout. Length (miles) 0 72 City HSIP 71 1 72 Funding Status: Secured PE RW Secured CN 1 71 1 1 0 72 Total 71 1 72 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances. 5/28/2019 Page 11 S"E I Y ane 2020-2025 Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program Dollars in Thousands Project / Description / Current Status / Length Total Funding Sources 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Total 34 Citywide Reflective Signal Backplates Description: Installation of reflective backplate panels at select traffic signals. (Rounding errors present.) Status: 2019 PE, 2020 CN, 2021 Closeout. Length (miles) 0 166 City HSIP 163 3 166 Funding Status: Secured PE RW Secured CN 2 162 3 2 0 165 Total 163 3 166 35 Barker Road Improvement Project - Spokane River to 4,318 City Euclid STBG Description: FMSIB Reconstruct and widen to 3 -lane urban section with shared -use path. HSIP Pathway will extend from Spokane River to the Grade Separation Project. (Rounding errors present.) Status: Design ongoing. Length (miles) 0.5 318 168 251 737 820 1,230 2,050 520 780 1,300 92 139 231 Funding Status: Secured PE Secured RW Secured CN 188 130 1,600 2,400 188 130 4,000 Total 318 1,600 2,400 4,318 36 Sprague Avenue / Barker Road Intersection Improvement Description: Provide new traffic signal or roundabout, per S. Barker Corridor Study. (Rounding errors present.) Status: Assume partial 2019 PE by City. Partial CMAQ funded for 2022 authorization, potential TIB candidate. Length (miles) Intersection 1,471 City CMAQ DEV 140 653 278 231 118 51 1,071 349 51 Funding Status: Partial PE Planned RW Partial CN 86 106 106 86 212 778 396 1,174 Total 191 884 396 1,471 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances. 5/28/2019 Page 12 S"E I Y ane 2020-2025 Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program Dollars in Thousands Project / Description / Current Status / Length Total Funding Sources 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Total 37 Mission Ave. Preservation - Mullan to University Description: Pavement preservation project with stormwater improvements as necessary. Status: Assumes 100% City funded (Fund 311). Length (miles) 0 1,400 City 35 62 1,303 1,400 Funding Status: Planned PE Planned RW Planned CN 35 35 27 3 1,300 70 30 1,300 Total 35 62 1,303 1,400 38 South Sullivan Road Preservation - Sprague to South 3,800 City City Limit Other Description: Pavement preservation from Sprague to the South City Limit with signal and stormwater improvements as necessary. Status: Seeking funds, candidate for TIB or STBG preservation funding. Assumes 20% City match. Length (miles) 2 60 686 14 760 240 2,744 56 3,040 Funding Status: Planned PE Planned RW Planned CN 300 300 0 3,430 70 3,500 Total 300 3,430 70 3,800 39 Sprague Stormwater Improvements 2,000 Other State City Description: Drywell retrofits between University and Park. Funded by Dept. of Ecology. Status: 2021 PE, 2022 CN, 2023 Closeout. 25% Local match. Length (miles) 2 74 1,398 28 1,500 24 466 10 500 Funding Status: Secured PE RW Secured CN 98 2 100 0 1,862 38 1,900 Total 98 1,864 38 2,000 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances. 5/28/2019 Page 13 • ` Val 1tyT' 2020-2025 Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program Dollars in Thousands Project / Description / Current Status / Length Total Funding Sources 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Total 40 Wilbur Road Sidewalk - Boone to Mission Description: Install sidewalk from Boone to Mission. Status: Pending funding. Length (miles) 0.3 643 City CDBG 4 79 83 41 519 560 Funding Status: Planned PE Planned RW Planned CN 45 19 64 21 21 558 558 Total 45 598 643 41 8th Avenue / Carnahan Road Intersection Improvement Description: Add intersection control (turn lanes, potential signal). Status: Assumes 20% City match. OTHER may be TIB, DEV or City. Length (miles) Intersection 1,250 City Other 35 215 250 140 860 1,000 Funding Status: Planned PE Planned RW Planned CN 175 1,075 175 0 1,075 Total 175 1,075 1,250 42 Argonne Road Concrete Pavement- Indiana to 5,800 City Montgomery STBG Description: FMSIB Reconstruct pavement in concrete and improve signal timing at Other Montgomery. Status: Length (miles) 0.3 98 292 390 633 1,877 2,510 1,160 1,160 1,740 1,740 Funding Status: Planned PE Planned RW Planned CN 691 40 5,069 691 40 5,069 Total 731 5,069 5,800 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances. 5/28/2019 Page 14 Sane Vallt' 2020-2025 Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program Dollars in Thousands Funding Project / Description / Current Status / Length Total Sources 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Total 43 Dishman-Mica Preservation - Schafer to S. City Limit Description: Pavement preservation project. Status: Assumes 100% City funded (Fund 311). Length (miles) 2 1,300 City 25 25 1,250 1,300 Funding Status: Planned PE Planned RW Planned CN 25 25 1,250 50 0 1,250 Total 25 25 1,250 1,300 44 32nd Avenue Preservation - Pines to SR 27 Description: Pavement preservation project. Status: Assumes 100% City funded (Fund 311). Length (miles) 0.8 1,300 City 45 1,255 1,300 Funding Status: PE RW CN 45 5 50 0 1,250 1,250 Total 45 1,255 1,300 45 8th Avenue / Barker Road Intersection Improvement Description: Provide new traffic signal or roundabout, per S. Barker Corridor Study. Status: Ongoing. Length (miles) Intersection 632 City 72 80 480 632 Funding Status: Planned PE Planned RW Planned CN 72 80 480 72 80 480 Total 72 80 480 632 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances. 5/28/2019 Page 15 S"E I Y ane Val 1C' 2020-2025 Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program Dollars in Thousands Project / Description / Current Status / Length Total Funding Sources 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Total 46 Mullan Road Preservation - Broadway to Mission Description: Pavement preservation project, provide conduit for future ITS infill, traffic signals improvements at Mission. Status: Applying for STBG Preservation funds. Length (miles) 0.3 1,400 City STBG 42 147 189 267 944 1,211 Funding Status: Planned PE Planned RW Planned CN 149 160 1,091 149 160 1,091 Total 309 1,091 1,400 47 Mirabeau Parkway / Mansfield Avenue Intersection 905 City Improvement CMAQ Description: Intersection capacity improvements. Status: Potential for Developer funds via Mirabeau Subarea Traffic Study. Length (miles) Intersection 120 110 230 25 650 675 Funding Status: Partial PE Planned RW Planned CN 120 120 25 75 100 685 685 Total 145 760 905 48 Barker Road Improvement Project - 1-90 to Appleway Description: Widen and improve to 5 -lane urban section. Realign east leg of Broadway. (Rounding errors present.) Status: Anticipated to follow 1-90 interchange improvements. Length (miles) 0.3 6,501 City Other 135 270 473 878 865 1,730 3,028 5,623 Funding Status: Planned PE Planned RW Planned CN 1,000 2,000 1,000 2,000 3,500 3,500 Total 1,000 2,000 3,501 6,501 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances. 5/28/2019 Page 16 2020-2025 Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program Dollars in Thousands Project / Description / Current Status / Length Total Funding Sources 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Total 49 Flora Road - Euclid to Garland Description: Reconstruct to an urban arterial section in partnership with Spokane County Sewer Extension Status: Seeking funding, assume 20% City match. Length (miles) 0.6 2,200 City Other 20 20 400 440 80 80 1,600 1,760 Funding Status: Planned PE Planned RW Planned CN 100 100 100 100 2,000 2,000 Total 100 100 2,000 2,200 50 Cataldo Avenue Realignment at Barker Road Description: Realign Cataldo east of Barker to intersect Boone Ave., per adopted Planned Action Ordinance. Status: Planned project. Assume PAO contributions from Developers in the amount of 10%, City 40%, grants 50%. CN after 2025. Length (miles) 0 600 City DEV Other 20 120 100 240 5 30 25 60 25 150 125 300 Funding Status: Planned PE Planned RW Planned CN 50 50 100 250 250 500 0 Total 50 300 250 600 51 Argonne Road & 1-90 Interchange Bridge Widening Description: Provide 3 lane bridge over 1-90 with sidewalks. Status: Price assumes bridge reconstruction, 20% City match, and CN after 2025. Length (miles) 0.1 500 City FMSIB STBG 50 50 100 200 200 400 Funding Status: Planned PE RW Planned CN 250 250 500 0 0 Total 250 250 500 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances. 5/28/2019 Page 17 2020-2025 Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program Dollars in Thousands Project / Description / Current Status / Length Total Funding Sources 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Total 52 Barker Road Improvement - Appleway to South City 2,854 City Limits TIB Description: Widen and improve roadway to 3 -lane urban section north of Sprague, and a 2 -lane urban section south of Sprague. Status: Identified in S. Barker Corridor Study. Length (miles) 0.8 46 340 386 293 2,175 2,468 Funding Status: Planned PE Planned RW Planned CN 326 326 13 13 25 2,502 2,502 Total 339 2,515 2,854 53 Park Road Improvements - Valleyway to Trent Description: Pavement preservation project from Valleyway to Trent. Project may include new sidewalk on select segments that align with City planning documents. Preservation and sidewalk projects may be completed together, or separately, pending available funding. Status: Assumes 100% City funded (Fund 311). Length (miles) 0.8 3,000 City 100 60 2,840 3,000 Funding Status: Planned PE Planned RW Planned CN 100 60 2,840 100 60 2,840 Total 100 60 2,840 3,000 54 8th Avenue / Park Road Intersection Improvement Description: Provide new traffic signal or roundabout. Status: Assume 2025 PE, 2026 ROW, 2027 CN. Length (miles) 0 400 City DEV Other 60 20 80 240 80 320 Funding Status: Planned PE Planned RW Planned CN 300 300 100 100 0 Total 300 100 400 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances. 5/28/2019 Page 18 Sane llt' 2020-2025 Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program Dollars in Thousands Project / Description / Current Status / Length Total Funding Sources 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Total 55 Appleway Trail - University to Dishman Mica Description: Construct shared -use path along Appleway Blvd, including northerly connection to City Hall on Dartmouth. Status: Planned project currently in its scoping phase. Length (miles) 0.9 2,000 TAP City 86 1,643 1,729 14 257 271 Funding Status: Planned PE Planned RW Planned CN 90 10 100 10 90 100 1,800 1,800 Total 100 1,900 2,000 56 Flora Road / Trent Avenue (SR 290) Intersection 100 City Improvement DEV Description: Other Provide new signal or roundabout, per adopted Planned Action Ordinance. Assume ROW & CN after 2025. Status: Planned project. Assume PAO contributions from Developers in the amount of 10%, City 40%, grants 50%. Length (miles) 0 20 20 40 5 5 10 25 25 50 Funding Status: Planned PE Planned RW Planned CN 50 50 100 0 0 Total 50 50 100 57 Sullivan Road / SR 290 Interchange Reconstruction Description: Reconstruct interchange to improve safety and capacity. Status: Assume partial PE in 2024-2025. Length (miles) 0 250 Other 125 125 250 Funding Status: Planned PE Planned RW Planned CN 125 125 250 0 0 Total 125 125 250 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances. 5/28/2019 Page 19 S"E I Y ane Val 1C' 2020-2025 Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program Dollars in Thousands Project / Description / Current Status / Length Total Funding Sources 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Total 58 Sullivan Road / Kiernan Avenue Intersection 50 City Improvement Other Description: Improve channelization and signal operations at intersection and reconstruct intersection with concrete. Status: Planned PE in 2025. Assume 20% City match. Length (miles) 0 10 10 40 40 Funding Status: Planned PE Planned RW Planned CN 50 50 0 0 Total 50 50 59 Sullivan Road / Marietta Avenue Intersection 50 City Improvement Other Description: Improve channelization and signal operations and reconstruction intersection with concrete. Status: Planned PE in 2025. Length (miles) 0 10 10 40 40 Funding Status: Planned PE Planned RW Planned CN 50 50 0 0 Total 50 50 60 Pines Road (SR -27) / 16th Avenue Intersection 100 City Improvement DEV Description: Other Add intersection traffic control. Status: Pending funding to improve five -leg intersection. Length (miles) Intersection 50 50 50 50 Funding Status: Planned PE Planned RW Planned CN 100 100 0 0 Total 100 100 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances. 5/28/2019 Page 20 2020-2025 Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program Dollars in Thousands Project / Description / Current Status / Length Total Funding Sources 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Total 61 Barker Road / Boone Avenue Intersection Improvement Description: Provide new signal or roundabout, per adopted Planned Action Ordinance. Assume ROW & CN after 2025. Status: Planned project. Assume PAO contributions from Developers in the amount of 10%, City 40%, grants 50%. Length (miles) 0 50 City DEV Other 20 20 5 5 25 25 Funding Status: Planned PE Planned RW Planned CN 50 50 0 0 Total 50 50 62 Broadway Avenue - Flora to Barker Description: Extend 3 -lane urban section to Barker Rd and realign connection east of Barker. Status: Possible partnership with WSDOT. Length (miles) 5E 80 City Other 16 16 64 64 Funding Status: Planned PE Planned RW Planned CN 80 80 0 0 Total 80 80 63 Barker Road - Mission to Interstate 90 Description: Widen and improve roadway to 5 -lane urban section. Improvements to the Boone intersection are identified separately. Status: Planned project for 2025 PE. Assume PAO contributions from Developers in the amount of 10%, City 40%, grants 50%. Length (miles) 0.3 200 City DEV Other 80 80 20 20 100 100 Funding Status: Planned PE Planned RW Planned CN 200 200 0 0 Total 200 200 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances. 5/28/2019 Page 21 Val 1C' 2020-2025 Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program Dollars in Thousands Project / Description / Current Status / Length Total Funding Sources 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Total Totals: 8,718 9,331 118,607 136,656 14,222 20,991 24,979 30,455 20,001 26,013 136,661 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances. 5/28/2019 Page 22 1. thru 14. 2020 Closeout Projects 7 Spvkan'•`, .0000Valley 10 3) 112 3,00D 5,00D '2,0M ; Fast 2020 1 jig a4 ———r tkti r — r •, - + 1 .• 2021 2022 L 2023 2024 2025 Project Description: Projects must remain in the TIP until all contract documents are complete. 2019 construction projects have potential to roll into 2020 and are conservatively included herein to avoid future amendments to the TIP in 2020. The full list of 2020 Closeout Projects is identified in the 2020-2025 TIP Report. Closeout costs are assumed to be 2% of the CN -phase total cost and cost estimate below is the sum of the applicable phase costs indicated in the 2020-2025 TIP Report. Phase: Preliminary Engineering (Closeout), Construction (Closeout) Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering (PE) 18,000 (One PE -Only Project) Right of Way (RW) 0 Construction (CN) 332,000 Total Cost (2020-2025) $ 350,000 15. North Sullivan Road ITS Project ens ��re W1 McDonald Rd Mirabeauo cc w Wellesley Ave Progress Rd TrentAve cc Euclid Ave °IMar+etta p`a e 40000 Val ley Mansfie Ave Indiana Ave • 0 0 `a) SF wb Adams Rd Broadway Ave 6,009.1 Vangskofsy Ave 2020 2021 90 eb 2022 2023 2024 2025 Project Description: Installation of conduit and extension of the fiber optic lines and controls for the continuation of the Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) along Sullivan Road from 1-90 to Trent Ave. (SR 290). Phase: Construction Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering (PE) 0 Right of Way (RW) 0 Construction (CN) 709,000 Total Cost (2020-2025) $709,000 16. Barker Road / BNSF Grade Separation eSp°kan• ►-.. p Project,0.0 Val ley 5i r•—•\ 0 80 160 320 480 Feet 1.11. P� e 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Project Description: Grade separate Barker Road from the BNSF Railway tracks and improve the intersection at Trent Avenue (SR 290). Phase: Preliminary Engineering, Right of Way, Construction Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering (PE) 119,000 Right of Way (RW) 1,273,000 Construction (CN) 21,033,000 Total Cost (2020-2025) $22,425,000 17. Pines Road (SR 27 / BNSF Grade Separation Pokan'' e�``' p .r . Val1ey 112 X370 Feat 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Project Description: Grade separate Pines Road (SR 27) from the BNSF Railway tracks and improve the intersection at Trent Avenue (SR 290). Phase: Preliminary Engineering, Right of Way, Construction Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering (PE) 1,250,000 Right of Way (RW) 4,200,000 Construction (CN) 22,075,000 Total Cost (2020-2025) $27,525,000 18. Sullivan Road / Wellesley Ave. Intersection E Wellesley Ave 15 ix 0 10 20 40 60 Feet I i I I i I 2020 2021 2022 Project Description: Improve intersection with traffic signal. Phase: Right of Way, Construction Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering (PE) Right of Way (RW) Construction (CN) Total Cost (2020-2025) ,�� Val ley 2023 2024 2025 0 108,000 1,052,000 $1,160,000 19. Adams Road Sidewalk �� Val ley S Warren Rd E 14th Ave E 17th Ave -s ct ce m E 18th AveCZ a CO 11. wE19thA� 43 Z-• 47 42 64s.000 nq y 'Icie br E 20th Ct m U 0 275 556 1.100 01,650 Feet 1 1 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Project Description: Install new sidewalk to complete a gap along the east side of Adams Road from 16th Avenue to 22nd Avenue. Phase: Preliminary Engineering, Construction Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering (PE) 16,000 Right of Way (RW) 0 Construction (CN) 429,000 Total Cost (2020-2025) $445,000 20. Conklin Road Sidewalk E-Riceiand Ln S Bet:en Ln E Birch Ln 0 87.6 176 E Sp -fp ce L n62, Feet J a) cri0 Spvkan'`� .0,0Val ley 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 fProject Description: Install new sidewalk to complete a short gap along the west side of Conklin Road from the Appleway Trail to Riceland Lane. Phase: Preliminary Engineering, Construction Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering (PE) 0 Right of Way (RW) 0 Construction (CN) 76,000 Total Cost (2020-2025) $76,000 21. Ella Road Sidewalk Spvkan'`� . Val ley 5c 150 380 c70 Feet E Broadway Ave E Alki Ave 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 fProject Description: Install new sidewalk to complete a gap along the west side of Ella Road from Broadway Avenue to Alki Avenue. Phase: Preliminary Engineering, Construction Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering (PE) 0 Right of Way (RW) 0 Construction (CN) 354,000 Total Cost (2020-2025) $354,000 22. Broadway Avenue - Havana to Fancher ,�� Val ley E Mission Ave E .Trent Ade E DesmetAve E CataldoAve E Mallon Ave 0 550 1,100 NEPaciiftcAve E 1 st34t E 2ndi Ave 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Project Description: Pavement preservation project, including stormwater improvements. Phase: Construction Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering (PE) Right of Way (RW) Construction (CN) Total Cost (2020-2025) 0 0 2,200,000 $2,200,000 23. Indiana Avenue - Evergreen to Sullivan ,�� Va11ey 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Project Description: Pavement preservation project, including stormwater and signal improvements as necessary. Phase: Preliminary Engineering, Construction Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering (PE) Right of Way (RW) Construction (CN) Total Cost (2020-2025) 10,000 0 1,900,000 $1,910,000 580 870 Feet 24. 8th Avenue - Progress to Sullivan N 0 0 N 0 145 290 ' E 91th'Ave' E 9th Ave 2020 2021 .000Valley 2022 2023 2024 2025 Project Description: Pavement preservation project, including possible sidewalk and stormwater upgrades. Project includes a partnership with Vera Water & Power for sidewalk extension along Vera's frontage. Phase: Preliminary Engineering, Construction Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering (PE) 5,000 Right of Way (RW) 0 Construction (CN) 650,000 Total Cost (2020-2025) $655,000 25. Street Preservation Projects - Annual 11� IFS 4-' +�►- li 1.r i # ♦ i � r - Spvkan'`� .0,I0 Val ley -- it Ili . I : � 1 1 n 1' 1 0 x,500 7,000 14,000 21,000 Feet` "1. • 2020 Legend CPCI_17 Poor Fair Goad 1 2021 1 2022 2023 2024 2025 Project Description: Pavement preservation projects citywide, typically located on arterial or collector streets; or funds can be used as local match for grant programs. Funds are provided via Fund 311. 2020 projects are identified within TIP. Phase: Preliminary Engineering, Construction Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering (PE) Right of Way (RW) Construction (CN) Total Cost (2020-2025) 500,000 0 17,500,000 $18,000,000 ($3.6 million annually) 26. Local Access Street Improvements - Annual II_ ... r� Spvkan'`� . Val ley 6 3,544 7,666 N 14,000 2020 2021 1 2022 Project Description: Pavement preservation projects citywide, prioritized to improve neighborhood streets (typically classified as local access streets but may also include higher functional classifications). Current funding is generated by the City's Street Wear Fee alone, estimated at $1.5 million annually. Project types vary depending on the condition of the pavements (surface treatments, grind/inlays, reconstruction). Legend CPCI_1 7 Poor Fair Good 2023 2024 2025 Phase: Preliminary Engineering, Construction Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering (PE) 600,000 Right of Way (RW) 0 Construction (CN) 8,400,000 Total Cost (2020-2025) $9,000,000 ($1.5 million annually) 27. Citywide Safety Projects - Biennial 11 -s ,. 1 1 1 - 1; -u 1 .1 • 1 11 _11 • .• '-.1 1 •'' •--''• l ••'• �. i� r +1 ' 1 1 J 1 � 1 _ f SI vkan! 40 Val ley — 1- ; • f .-+ _ _ I '• 7 II Nf •. • 0 3.200 6.400 12.800 2020 1 ► •_ • ■ 11 1 19.40 Feet 11 1.. , 1 — ► 1 .y.1 Legend Safety Priority 1 Streets Safety Priority 2 Streets 2021 1 2022 2023 2024 2025 Project Description: Federally funded calls -for -projects occurring in even -numbered years. Projects are assumed to be low-cost, citywide, systemic improvements but can also be larger, spot -specific projects. 2020 projects are identified specifically in TIP. Primary funding source is the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP). Project schedule and budget assumes project implementation in odd -numbered years and project design and/or closeout in even numbered years. Phase: Preliminary Engineering, Right of Way, Construction Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering (PE) 50,000 Right of Way (RW) 0 Construction (CN) 450,000 Total Cost (2020-2025) $500,000 28. Park Road / Mission Avenue Intersection N Bowman Rd 90 180 I i I E Missian Ave a: Y <4 270 Feet J 2020 2021 2022 ,�� Val ley 2023 2024 2025 Project Description: Improve channelization and signal operations, minor stormwater upgrades as necessary. Phase: Preliminary Engineering, Right of Way, Construction Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering (PE) Right of Way (RW) Construction (CN) Total Cost (2020-2025) 100,000 60,000 1,540,000 $1,700,000 29. Sullivan Road Bridge Deck Resurfacing Spvkan'`� ley 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Project Description: Resurface existing bridge deck for Sullivan Road northbound over UPRR tracks. Phase: Preliminary Engineering, Construction Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering (PE) 68,000 Right of Way (RW) 0 Construction (CN) 270,000 Total Cost (2020-2025) $338,000 30. Evergreen Road - Sprague to Mission _ Val1ey E N ora Ave E 90 Fey h0'f� na Ave Boone Ave w U N Pines R d E Gataldo Ave E Broadway Ave O 0 E Alki Ave E Valleyway Ave E Main Ave 0 700 1,400 IX 'L7 41 c � o m Z800 La 4,20© Feet 5 1,11E 6th Av e E Sprague Ave E 3rd Ave E 4th Ave 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Project Description: Pavement preservation project, including minor stormwater and signal improvements as necessary. Phase: Preliminary Engineering, Right of Way, Construction Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering (PE) Right of Way (RW) Construction (CN) Total Cost (2020-2025) 80,000 0 1,420,000 $1,500,000 31. Appleway Boulevard Stormwater Improvements SOOkan�``'' , .. Va11ey E Nixon Ave Main Ave N Su to -73 s � o. -> 0 360 720 N p' 9> E6th Ave 1.4-40 2,160 Feet E Archery Avc E 8th Ave 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Project Description: Improve stormwater facilities between University Road and Farr Road. Phase: Preliminary Engineering, Construction Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering (PE) Right of Way (RW) Construction (CN) Total Cost (2020-2025) 150,000 0 850,000 $1,000,000 32. Pines Road / Mission Avenue Intersection ,�� Val ley k", 90 Bch Opp EM ssionAve E Maxwell Ave 100 4u 000 Feet N Houk Rd 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Project Description: A two -phased project to improve signal timing and add turn lanes to improve intersection capacity. Phase 1 revises channelization and signal operations on Mission Avenue and adds a second left turn lane for eastbound Mission Ave. Phase 2 includes the addition of a Pines Road southbound right turn lane on to Mission Ave. Phase 1 is scheduled for 2020-2021 and Phase 2 is unfunded. Based on the improvements associated with Phase 1, the timing or scope of Phase 2 may be altered. Phase: Preliminary Engineering, Right of Way, Construction Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering (PE) Right of Way (RW) Construction (CN) Total Cost (2020-2025) Phase 1 Phase 2 Total 90,000 120,000 210,000 0 32,000 32,000 498,000 660,000 1,158,000 $588,000 $812,000 $1,400,000 r1 33. Citywide Reflective Post Panels Sr t 1! � 1 t_1 ::1(j d1+ yRrtej _ • • --M.1` E ❑ • •1 = {+- 1 1 ` 0. 1 - -1 1 -t 1_- . -1+J 7 - - 1 0 3,350 6,700 13,400 2071Q0Zeet 2020 2021 mlm 1 ` • Ei - -1 Spvkan'`� .0,00 Val ley I. — r : + + r r A • 1 ti 1 n 2022 2023 Legend E Priorityl_StopSigns 35MPH_Priarity 1_Signs • Priority2_StopSigns 2024 2025 Project Description: Installation of reflective panels on stop sign posts and speed limit sign posts on select streets. Phase: Preliminary Engineering, Construction Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering (PE) 1,000 Right of Way (RW) 0 Construction (CN) 71,000 Total Cost (2020-2025) $72,000 34. Citywide Reflective Signal Backplates o 0 Spvkan'`� .0,00 Val ley -•-, ._..,-• r, • .c a N • • 7 J� rJ 1 rt 3, 350 5,700 � I • 1 1 1 1 1 1 J 1 ✓ 1 1 Y 13,400 2571 0 eet •` 1 2020 ' 2021 2022 2023 Legend • Citywide Signal Backplates Safety Priority 1 Streets Safety Priority 2 Streets 0 2024 2025 Project Description: Installation of reflective backplate panels at select traffic signal locations. Phase: Preliminary Engineering, Construction Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering (PE) 2,000 Right of Way (RW) 0 Construction (CN) 165,000 Total Cost (2020-2025) $167,000 35. Barker Road - Spokane River to Euclid N w z E Montgomery Ave cr ;5 EsahannOrioAve EEuclidAve z m � 3 c_ m Z k`4y E Marietta Ave c�y�ry 4. O y EJack � pc OtIve Emontg z 3 cn E Buckeye Ave ,�� Val ley 2,550 Feet 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2 0 Project Description: Reconstruct Barker Road to 3 -lane urban section with a shared -use pathway. The shared -use pathway will extend from the Spokane River and connect to the grade separation project at Trent Avenue. Phase: Preliminary Engineering, Right of Way, Construction Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering (PE) Right of Way (RW) Construction (CN) Total Cost (2020-2025) 188,000 130,000 4,000,000 $4,318,000 36. Sprague Avenue / Barker Road Intersection .0,00 Val ley Sr 720 Feet I I .10 CC L 6.6. 16 CO z E Sprague Ave S Barker Rd E 2nd Ave 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Project Description: Improve intersection with traffic signal or roundabout as part of overall improvements to the Barker Corridor in order to accommodate current and planned development. Phase: Preliminary Engineering, Right of Way, Construction Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering (PE) Right of Way (RW) Construction (CN) Total Cost (2020-2025) 86,000 212,000 1,174,000 $1,472,000 37. Mission Avenue - MuIlan to University E Montgomery Ave ,�� Val ley E Knox Ave +r aargent rca N Mary Z 0_ Sinto Ave a ct z E Cataldo Ave El gq FwY E Nora Ave a 4G `v_E Mission,Ave N 0 500 1,000 2,000 3,000 Feet z re 0 0 z N Hera Id Rd a o m E sharp Ave L a z m E Broadway Ave 2020 2021 2022 z E Boone Ave ac a z 2023 2024 2025 Project Description: Pavement preservation project with stormwater and signal upgrades as necessary. Phase: Preliminary Engineering, Right of Way, Construction Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering (PE) Right of Way (RW) Construction (CN) Total Cost (2020-2025) 70,000 30,000 1,300,000 $1,400,000 38. Sullivan Road - Sprague to South City Limit E Broadway Ave 0 EMain Ave g z E Sprague Ave N N E Valleyway Ave E Alki Ave .0,00 Val ley Ct E ay P,`ie E 1169 z _._. fIi w - vrl f E 26th Ave 4.- E Skyview 've E 31st Ave E 10thAve E 4th Ave E 8th Ave E 12th Ave Er) 0 J y Ts E 16th Ave E 03 U) E 24th Ave E 20th Ave s 0' m 3 m N 0:. V) 5.600 8,40-0 FeetE 36th Ave in I ed I. s0) ;aa S CO S Barker Rd Toth Ave 2020 2021 1 2022 2023 2024 2025 Project Description: Pavement preservation project with stormwater and signal upgrades as necessary. Phase: Preliminary Engineering, Construction Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering (PE) Right of Way (RW) Construction (CN) Total Cost (2020-2025) 300,000 0 3,500,000 $3,800,000 39. Sprague Avenue Stormwater Improvements Pokane�``' p .0,000Valley E Nara Ave N E 2n d;A_ ve E•3rd Ave•° E Sth Ave E fith Ave z E Alki Ave E -Sprague Ave 4p pple.! ay:glvd m u. • 0) N LL z cc E9th Ave 0 1,150 Z300 4,600 6,900 Feet I 1 • I N Wo E Mission Ave N N Felts Rd N N E Valleyway Ave E Main Ave 2020 2021 2022 2023 E4th Ave E 8th Ave E 1 Oth Ave E 1 2th Ave S Oberlin Rd C z S Bowdish Rd E 17th Ave E 19th Ave E 20th Ave 2024 2025 fProject Description: Improve stormwater facilities, including drywell retrofits, between University Road and Park Road. Phase: Preliminary Engineering, Construction Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering (PE) Right of Way (RW) Construction (CN) Total Cost (2020-2025) 100,000 0 1,900,000 $2,000,000 800 0 200 40 40. Wilbur Road Sidewalk ,�� Val ley N Skipworth GI E Sinto Ave E Sinto Ln �° s 0 Ce m CO 1.200 Kat 2020 2021 z EBoone Ave 2022 2023 —J O CC z N Perrine Rd 2024 2025 Project Description: Install sidewalk from Boone Avenue to Mission Avenue to complete sidewalk connection on a designated Safe Route to School. Phase: Preliminary Engineering, Right of Way, Construction Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering (PE) 64,000 Right of Way (RW) 21,000 Construction (CN) 558,000 Total Cost (2020-2025) $643,000 41. 8th Avenue / Carnahan Road Intersection Spvkan'`� iii••••O Val ley cc E 8th Ave 0 100 200 300 Feet I I I U 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Project Description: Improve intersection control (i.e. turn lanes and/or signal). Phase: Preliminary Engineering, Construction Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering (PE) Right of Way (RW) Construction (CN) Total Cost (2020-2025) 175,000 0 1,075,000 $1,250,000 E Montgomery Ave its Y I. n z h 0 170 340 680 1,020 Feet I I i I i I i I 42. Argonne Road - Indiana to Montgomery Spvkan'`, _rVal ley 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Project Description: Reconstruct Argonne Road in reinforced concrete, improve channelization and signal operations at Montgomery, and provide stormwater upgrades as necessary. Phase: Preliminary Engineering, Right of Way, Construction Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering (PE) Right of Way (RW) Construction (CN) Total Cost (2020-2025) 691,000 40,000 5,069,000 $5,800,000 43. Dishman Mica Road - Schafer to S. City Limit SPokan'' e�``'' ter. Valley E 30th Ave E 31 st Av e .y cn E 44th Ave E 46th Ave a� Rd Ferret Dr 0) 0 875 1,750 3,500 I I I I 5!250 Feet Bowdish Rd e ABth Ave E 32nd Ave S � co 7'0 Lira 38Th Ave CC v� 3 0 0 co E 40th Ave 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Project Description: Pavement preservation project from the intersection of Schafer Road/University Road to the city's southerly boundary. Phase: Preliminary Engineering, Construction Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering (PE) Right of Way (RW) Construction (CN) Total Cost (2020-2025) 50,000 0 1,250,000 $1,300,000 44. 32nd Avenue - Pines Road to SR 27 S Whipple Rd E Sky view Ave E Lenora Dr S Collins Rd 5 Vere er Dr _ 1. &I Fera I I i I i I E27thAve E 31st Ave E 32nd Ave U7 O 47. m E 36th Ave a 5 McDonald St E 28th Ave E 29th Ave ,�� Val ley 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Project Description: Pavement preservation project from the intersection of Pines Road to State Route 27. Phase: Preliminary Engineering, Construction Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering (PE) Right of Way (RW) Construction (CN) Total Cost (2020-2025) 50,000 0 1,250,000 $1,300,000 F R 45. 8th Avenue / Barker Road Intersection J O1 U) (0m E 9th Ave E 10th Ave E 9th Ct m °''61Q 0 150 300 600 900 Feet vee th Ave N co Spvkan'`� . Val ley S McMillan Rd Ir• 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Project Description: Improve intersection with traffic signal or roundabout. Phase: Preliminary Engineering, Right of Way, Construction Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering (PE) 72,000 Right of Way (RW) 80,000 Construction (CN) 480,000 Total Cost (2020-2025) $632,000 46. MuIlan Road - Broadway to Mission s19d rwy E90 E287 OFF Ramp ,�� Val ley E Mission Ave tx as ♦N CO x N E Sinto Ave E Boone Ave E Cataldo Ave 0 380 760. A ki b52a Y A e� E Broadway Ave 2 z 2 1 C.;') z 2,280 Feet v a N Walnut Rd N Herald Rd 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Project Description: Pavement preservation project, including ITS conduit and improvements to stormwater and signals as necessary. Phase: Preliminary Engineering, Right of Way, Construction Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering (PE) Right of Way (RW) Construction (CN) Total Cost (2020-2025) 149,000 160,000 1,091,000 $1,400,000 47. Mirabeau / Mansfield Intersection ,�� Val ley E0 100 1E0 Feet I I I 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Project Description: Improve intersection traffic control as surrounding area continues to develop. Phase: Preliminary Engineering, Right of Way, Construction Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering (PE) 120,000 Right of Way (RW) 100,000 Construction (CN) 685,000 Total Cost (2020-2025) $905,000 E 1 90 W293 Ot+1 Ra'V E r 90 E293 OFF %Mp E 1 90 Fwy `�qg3 Q� RamP E Broadway Ave 48. Barker Road - 1-90 to Appleway .00•10Val ley owkev pue E corbin P1 0 225 450 aNN pv e le ■r t "= 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Project Description: Widen Barker Road to a 5 -lane urban section. Phase: Preliminary Engineering, Right of Way, Construction Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering (PE) Right of Way (RW) Construction (CN) Total Cost (2020-2025) 1,000,000 2,000,000 3,500,000 $6,500,000 2025 49. Flora Road - Euclid to Garland ,�� Val ley E Trent Ave n n 1 ° E Industrial Park D St Industrial Park A St E Industrial Park 8 St E Industrial Park C St E Industrial Park E St N Industrial Park 5th St n ` Ea,ctetta Ave 0 550 1.100 2.21010 3.300 Feet a els0 rE Dalton Ave N Tsc hirley Rd r.+ c/) w z 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Project Description: Widen Flora Road to a 3 -lane urban section in partnership with Spokane County sewer extension. Project's north limits will connect to the 2019 construction of Garland Avenue. Phase: Preliminary Engineering, Right of Way, Construction Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering (PE) Right of Way (RW) Construction (CN) Total Cost (2020-2025) 100,000 100,000 2,000,000 $2,200,000 50. Cataldo Avenue Realignment at Barker Road SPokan' e�``' g .r�00 Val1ey c°°ne Pkv e 0 90 180 360 540 Feet e I go S293 014 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Project Description: Realign Cataldo Ave. east of Barker to intersect Boone Ave. as a part of the I- 90 interchange improvements. Phase: Preliminary Engineering, Right of Way Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering (PE) 100,000 Right of Way (RW) 500,000 Construction (CN) 0 Total Cost (2020-2025) $600,000 SPe•`' 51. Argonne & 1-90 Interchange Bridge Widening kan � . Va11ey w s%go FWV rn Q Er 90E287OFfi&aenp wI 0 90 190 360 510 Feet E 190 W287 OFF Ramp z m 7C 0 rm. a E 1 90 E267 RamP kr� 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Project Description: Reconstruct and widen Argonne Road bridge over 1-90 to accommodate three southbound lanes and improved pedestrian access across the bridge. Phase: Preliminary Engineering Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering (PE) 500,000 Right of Way (RW) 0 Construction (CN) 0 Total Cost (2020-2025) $500,000 52. Barker Road - Appleway to South CityLimitsPokan�``' , u Va11ey N Flora Rd m E 3rd Ave ce) E 5th Ave E Alki Ave 0 v z E fith Ave 0 0 a N oadway Ave ieaY pole Y Derry pr E lz Etot °nAve E Sprague Ave C CD 0 2 un E 4th Ave E 9th Ave 0 ?EO 1.EOO 8.000 4.EO0 Feet treE 8th Ave E 2nd Ave E 12th Ave E11thAve E 15th Ave 1 2020 2021 Project Description: Widen Barker Road to a 3 -lane urban section. 2022 2023 2024 2025 Phase: Preliminary Engineering, Right of Way, Construction Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering (PE) Right of Way (RW) Construction (CN) Total Cost (2020-2025) 326,000 25,000 2,502,000 $2,854,000 53. Park Road - Valleyway to Trent (SR 290) Marietta Ave OC 0 E-"entpve... E Montgomery Ave __ rValley E Knox Ave v N z v 2 E Sharp Ave as V 2 N Lake Rd 2 E Dean Ave tY Ct m en w z z E Mission Ave z N Bradley Rd 3600 2E0 Feet 12nd Ave Yj E Indiana Ave E Nora Ave *44 gd OC � w 7 z z EiBroadway Ave E Alki Ave E Valleyway Ave E Sprague Ave m E Sinto Ave'7g E Boone Ave Q z N Bessie Rd N Sargent Rd IX m `m z E Main Ave E Appleway Blvd 2 z N Willow Rd N Locust Rd N Farr Rd E1st Ave L 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Project Description: Pavement preservation project from Valleyway to Trent. Phase: Preliminary Engineering, Right of Way, Construction Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering (PE) Right of Way (RW) Construction (CN) Total Cost (2020-2025) 100,000 60,000 2,840,000 $3,000,000 ,f0 100 200 C i C 54. 8th Avenue / Park Road Intersection E 8th Av e S Edgerton Ln Faat .00•10Val ley E 7th Ln S Edgerton Rd 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Project Description: Improve intersection with traffic signal or roundabout. Phase: Preliminary Engineering, Right of Way Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering (PE) 300,000 Right of Way (RW) 100,000 Construction (CN) 0 Total Cost (2020-2025) $400,000 55. Appleway Trail - University to Dishman Mica ,�� Val ley E Alki Ave N Willow Rd N Locust Rd E 1st Ave Iss u_ (13 LJ - z N Walnut Rd E Sprague Ave E 8th Ave 0 500 1,000 2040 _ ?,000 Feet I I I Walnut Rd 2 rn Tv z N Raymond Rd N University Rd E 4th Ave -0 cC 1 m rn E 9th Ave E VaileywayAve E Main Ave E 3rd Ave E 6th Ave E 7th Ave cc m u 1 CD e us E 1 Oth Ave 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Project Description: Construct a shared -use pathway along Appleway Blvd., including a northerly connection to City Hall on Dartmouth Road. Phase: Preliminary Engineering, Right of Way, Construction Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering (PE) Right of Way (RW) Construction (CN) Total Cost (2020-2025) 100,000 100,000 1,800,000 $2,000,000 56. Flora Road / Trent Avenue (SR 290) Intersection Sp°Kan•`►-.. .0,00Val ley 60 120 24-0 360 Feet E Tre nt Ave 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Project Description: Provide a new signal or roundabout at intersection, per adopted Planned Action Ordinance. The south leg of Flora Road will be closed as part of the Barker Road/BNSF Grade Separation project and is excluded from this scope of work. Phase: Preliminary Engineering Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering (PE) 100,000 Right of Way (RW) 0 Construction (CN) 0 Total Cost (2020-2025) $100,000 57. Sullivan Road / SR 290 Interchange N Lucille Rd E H eroy Ave E Longfellow Ave ,�� Val ley E Yre nt Ave 0 275 550 1100 1.650 Feet N 1 E Kiernan Ave E Industrial Park A St E Industrial Park B St 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 1 2025 fProject Description: Reconstruct interchange to improve safety and capacity. Traffic study and interchange alternative evaluation in 2019. Assumed PE start in 2024. Phase: Preliminary Engineering Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering (PE) 250,000 Right of Way (RW) 0 Construction (CN) 0 Total Cost (2020-2025) $250,000 r 2025 58. Sullivan Road / Kiernan Avenue Intersection ,�� Val ley 300 15 E Kiernan Ave m 46 J Feet rn z 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Project Description: Reconstruct intersection with reinforced concrete and improve channelization and signal operations. Phase: Preliminary Engineering Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering (PE) 50,000 Right of Way (RW) 0 Construction (CN) 0 Total Cost (2020-2025) $50,000 59. Sullivan Road / Marietta Avenue Intersection Spokane _.Val ley 0 60 120 240 3,30 Feet E Marietta Ave 0 z 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Project Description: Reconstruct intersection with reinforced concrete and improve channelization and signal operations. Phase: Preliminary Engineering Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering (PE) 50,000 Right of Way (RW) 0 Construction (CN) 0 Total Cost (2020-2025) $50,000 60. Pines Road (SR 27 / 16th Avenue Intersection SPokan'' e�`"'' tri Va11ey Z, ulIIuII R[] CC S Houk Rd E 14th Ave E 13th Ave E 15th Ave E 1 fith Ave co 1 0 190 380 760 1.140 Feet N E h 9th.Avv' 1 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Project Description: Improve 5 -leg intersection design and traffic control. Phase: Preliminary Engineering Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering (PE) 100,000 Right of Way (RW) 0 Construction (CN) 0 Total Cost (2020-2025) $100,000 61. Barker Road / Boone Avenue Intersection Spokan�```' __ rValley E 5into Ave 014 Re r111) �a 0 120 240 480 720 Feet 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Project Description: Provide a new signal or roundabout at intersection, per adopted Planned Action Ordinance, as a part of the 1-90 interchange improvements. Phase: Preliminary Engineering Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering (PE) 50,000 Right of Way (RW) 0 Construction (CN) 0 Total Cost (2020-2025) $50,000 62. Broadway Avenue - Flora to Barker ,�� Val ley stn et Ct u, m E Mission Ave Q ESintoAve E Sharp Avf�aoone Ave E Cataldo Ave E Broadway Ave 0.' E ValleywayAve 0 1 z CC c 1 O E iwoell ay pv � Co,N1eY �,ve 0 625 1,250 2.500 3,750 Feet E 31d,AYe CC as c O n E Sprague Ave 2 rn E 2nd Ave 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Project Description: Improve Broadway to a 3 -lane urban section and realign the east leg of the Barker / Broadway intersection. Schedule assumes that project will begin after WSDOT's completion if its I-90/Barker Road interchange roundabout projects. Phase: Preliminary Engineering, Right of Way, Construction Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering (PE) 80,000 Right of Way (RW) 0 Construction (CN) 0 Total Cost (2020-2025) $80,000 0 22 63. Barker Road - Mission to Interstate 90 N Greenacres Rd E Mission Ave E Maxwell Ave E Sint° Ave E Sharp Ave E Desmet Ave 5 450 900 1,350 Feet I I i I c8°one Ave N Harmony Ln E Cataldo Ave Spvkan'`� ley 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Project Description: Improve Barker to a 5 -lane urban section. Improvements to the Boone intersection are identified separately in this TIP. Phase: Preliminary Engineering Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering (PE) 200,000 Right of Way (RW) 0 Construction (CN) 0 Total Cost (2020-2025) $200,000 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: June 4, 2019 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: Ei consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Approval of the Following Vouchers: VOUCHER LIST VOUCHER NUMBERS 05/22/2019 8177-8187 05/22/2019 6671; 6683-6684; 6686; 6688 05/23/2019 47660-47688 05/23/2019 47689-47704 TOTAL AMOUNT $1,272.00 $83,077.40 $117,137.05 $72,530.92 GRAND TOTAL: $274,017.37 Explanation of Fund Numbers found on Voucher Lists #001- General Fund 001.011.000.511. City Council 001.013.000513. City Manager 001.013.015.515. Legal 001.016.000. Public Safety 001.018.013.513. Deputy City Manager 001.018.014.514. Finance 001.018.016.518. Human Resources 001.040.041. Engineering 001.040.042. Economic Development 001.040.043. Building 001.076.000.576. Parks & Rec—Administration 001.076.300.576. Parks & Rec-Maintenance 001.076.301.571. Parks & Rec-Recreation 001.076.302.576. Parks & Rec- Aquatics 001.076.304.575. Parks & Rec- Senior Center 001.076.305.571. Parks & Rec-CenterPlace 001.090.000.511. General Gov't- Council related 001.090.000.514. General Gov't -Finance related 001.090.000.517. General Gov't -Employee supply 001.090.000.518. General Gov't- Centralized Serv. 001.090.000.519. General Gov't -Other Services 001.090.000.540. General Gov't -Transportation 001.090.000.550. General Gov't -Natural & Eco. 001.090.000.595. General Gov't -Pavement Preset'. 001.090.000.560. General Gov't -Social Services 001.090.000.594 General Gov't -Capital Outlay Other Funds: 101 — Street Fund 103 — Paths & Trails 105 — Hotel/Motel Tax 106 — Solid Waste 120 — CenterPlace Operating Reserve 121 -- Service Level Stabilization Reserve 122 — Winter Weather Reserve 204 Debt Service 301 — REET 1 Capital Projects 302 — REET 2 Capital. Projects 303 — Street Capital Projects 309 —Parks Capital Grants 310 — Civic Bldg. Capital Projects 311 — Pavement Preservation 312 — Capital Reserve 314 — Railroad Grade Separation Projects 402 — Stormwater Management 403 -- Aquifer Protection Area 501 — Equipment Rental & Replacement 502 — Risk Management RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to approve attached list of claim vouchers. [Approved as part of the Consent Agenda, or may be removed and discussed separately.] STAFF CONTACT: Cheisie Taylor, Finance Director ATTACHMENTS: Voucher Lists vchlist 05/22/2019 11:53:OOAM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: 1 Bank code : pk-ref Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 8177 5/2212019 007224 BLEDSOE, MARILYN 8178 5/22/2019 007225 BROWN, TIFFANY PARKS REFUND PARKS REFUND 8179 5/22/2019 006581 COMUNIDAD CRISTIANA DE SPOKANE PARKS REFUND 8180 5/22/2019 007226 COSENS, LAURA 8181 5/22/2019 007227 D[ETERLE, CHRISTINE 8182 5/22/2019 006251 GASPAR, VICTORIA 8183 5/22/2019 007228 MARCHAND, LISA 8184 5/22/2019 007222 MARTINEZ, ASHLEE 8185 5/22/2019 006236 MESSERSMITH, JEFF 8186 5/22/2019 007229 STREHLOU, MACKENZIE 8187 5/22/2019 007223 WATSON, CARLEY 11 Vouchers for bank code : pk-ref 11 Vouchers in this report PARKS REFUND PARKS REFUND PARKS REFUND PARKS REFUND PARKS REFUND PARKS REFUND PARKS REFUND PARKS REFUND Fund/Dept Description/Account 001.237.10.99 001.237.10.99 001.237.10.99 001.237.10.99 001.237.10.99 001.237.10.99 001.237.10.99 001.237.10.99 001.237.10.99 001.237.10.99 001.237.10.99 Amount DEPOSIT REFUND: MIRABEAU ME, Total : DEPOSIT REFUND: DISCOVERY PL Total : DEPOSIT REFUND: GREENACRES Total : DEPOSIT REFUND: DISCOVERY PL Total : DEPOSIT REFUND: MIRABEAU ME Total : CANCELLATION REFUND: GREEN/ Total : DEPOSIT REFUND: BROWNS PARI Total : TEEN CAMP WEEK REFUND Total : SUMMER DAY CAMP REFUND Total : DEPOSIT REFUND: DISCOVERY PL Total : SUMMER DAY CAMP REFUND Total : Bank total : 75.00 75.00 75.00 75.00 75.00 75.00 75.00 75.00 75.00 75.00 243.00 243.00 75.00 75.00 144.00 144.00 120.00 120.00 75.00 75.00 240.00 240.00 1,272.00 Total vouchers : 1,272.00 Page: 1 vchlist Voucher List 05/22/2019 2:10:26PM Spokane Valley Page: Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 6671 5/20/2019 002227 IDAHO TAX COMMISSION Ben86707 6683 5/20/2019 000048 VANTAGE TRANSFER AGENTS, 401A PLS Ben86709 6684 5/20/2019 000682 EFTPS Ben86711 6686 5/20/2019 000145 VANTAGEPOINT TRANSFER AGENTS, 4E Ben86713 6688 5/20/2019 000162 VANTAGE TRANSFER AGENTS, 401A EX Ben86715 5 Vouchers for bank code : apbank 5 Vouchers in this report Fund/Dept DescriptionlAccount Amount 001.231.50.03 IDAHO STATE TAX BASE: PAYMEN1 Total : 001.231.14.00 401A: PAYMENT 001.231.11.00 FEDERAL TAXES: PAYMENT 001.231.18.00 457 DEFERRED COMPENSATION: I Total : 001.231.14.00 401 EXEC PLAN: PAYMENT 1,481.13 1,481.13 36,402.02 Total : 36,402.02 Total : Total : Bank total : 83,077.40 Total vouchers : 83,077.40 35,180.30 35,180.30 9,337.69 9,337.69 676.26 676.26 vchlist 05123/2019 9:21:06AM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 47660 5/23/2019 001107 ADVANCEDTRAFFIC PRODUCTS 47661 5/23/2019 003076 AMSDEN, ERICA 47662 5/23/2019 000843 ASFPM 47663 5/23/2019 000796 BUDINGER & ASSOCIATES INC 47664 5/23/2019 001888 COMCAST 47665 5/23/2019 000734 DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION 47666 5/23/2019 000999 EASTERN WA ATTORNEY SVC INC 47667 5/23/2019 003274 EXCHANGE PUBLISHING LLC 0000023706 EXPENSES CFM RENEWAL P19122-2 518777-2 518777-4 May 18 -June 17 2019 RE-313-ATB90415128 121762 529903 529904 529905 529906 530695 530696 530697 530698 530699 530700 530701 530702 Fund/Dept 303.000.287.595 001.040.041.543 001.040.043.558 311.000.290.595 001.033.000.518 001.033.000.518 Description/Account Amount 0287- SIGNAL EQUIPMENT Total : EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT Total : CFM RENEWAL FEE: D. HORTON Total : 0290-GEOTECH SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Total : 001.090.000.518 INTERNET CITY HALL 311.000.252.595 001.013.015.515 001.040.043.558 001.013.000.513 001.013.000.513 001.040.043.558 001.013.000.513 001.013.000.513 001.040.043.558 001.040.043.558 001.040.043.558 001.040.043.558 001.013.000.513 001.040.043.558 Total : 0252 - CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER Total : PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LEGAL PUBLICATION LEGAL PUBLICATION LEGAL PUBLICATION LEGAL PUBLICATION LEGAL PUBLICATION LEGAL PUBLICATION LEGAL PUBLICATION LEGAL PUBLICATION LEGAL PUBLICATION LEGAL PUBLICATION LEGAL PUBLICATION LEGAL PUBLICATION Total : Total : 2,260.76 2,260.76 54.08 54.08 80.00 80.00 682.03 2,104.77 475.60 3,262.40 106.18 106.18 46.56 46.56 65.00 65.00 55.50 34.50 20.54 58.46 34.50 19.50 55.50 82.95 83.74 53.72 23.70 60.83 583.44 Page: vchlist 05/23/2019 9:21:06A1V1 Voucher List Spokane Valley ev- Page: 7 —2 -- Bank-. Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 47668 5/23/2019 001926 FARR, SARAH 47669 5/23/2019 003261 FEHR & PEERS 47670 5/23/2019 001447 FREE PRESS PUBLISHING INC 47671 5/23/2019 002810 INLAND NW PARTNERS ASSOC 47672 5/23/2019 005472 JOHNSON, JOHN 47673 5/23/2019 000012 JOURNAL OF BUSINESS 47674 5/23/2019 005414 KAR-GOR INC. 47675 5/23/2019 006328 KREM-TV 47676 5/23/2019 001944 LANCER LTD 47677 5/23/2019 005931 LOCHMILLER, ROBERT 47678 5/23/2019 000239 NORTHWEST BUSINESS STAMP INC. EXPENSES Fund/Dept 001.018.014.514 Description/Account Amount EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 129995 001.040.042.558 TRAFFIC STUDY 49835 49837 49858 49859 49860 49861 SUMMER 2019 EXPENSES 61843 K1031922 K1041921 001.040.043.558 001.040.043.558 001.040.043.558 001.040.043.558 001.040.043.558 001.040.043.558 001.040.042.558 402.402.000.531 001.018.014.514 303.000.287.595 303.000.287.595 4-2019 SUMMARY BILL 001.040.042.558 0473751 EXPENSES 102722 001.013.015.515 001.040.041.543 001.040.043.558 LEGAL PUBLICATION LEGAL PUBLICATION LEGAL PUBLICATION LEGAL PUBLICATION LEGAL PUBLICATION LEGAL PUBLICATION Total : Total : Total : SUMMER 2019 MEETING REGISTR, Total : EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT Total : 3 YR SUBSCRIPTION : D. DUFFEY Total : 0287 -TRAFFIC SIGNAL EQUIPMEN- 0287-TRAFFIC SIGNAL EQUIPMEN- Tota l : ADVERTISING BUSINESS CARDS EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT Total : Total : Total : 104.69 104.69 1,412.50 1,412.50 126.40 65.45 95.20 94.35 62.90 69.70 514.00 40.00 40.00 23.09 23.09 99.95 99.95 93.19 7,921.12 8,014.31 17,115.00 17,115.00 63.17 63.17 10.00 10.00 STAMP 99.39 Page: �� vchlist 05/23/2019 9:21:06AM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: -3— Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor invoice 47678 5/23/2019 000239 000239 NORTHWEST BUSINESS STAMP IN( (Continued) 47679 5/23/2019 000652 OFFICE DEPOT INC. 47680 5/23/2019 000459 SPOKANE CO TITLE CO 47681 5/23/2019 000001 SPOKANE CO TREASURER 47682 5/23/2019 000065 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 47683 5/23/2019 004740 THOMSON REUTERS -WEST 47684 5/23/2019 001108 TRAFFIC PARTS INC 47685 5/23/2019 000295 VALLEYFEST 47686 5/23/2019 000167 VERA WATER & POWER 47687 5/23/2019 000964 VOLT MANAGEMENT CORP 312969295001 313198900001 313990905001 314017097001 314017406001 SP18900-RF 110100239 42000616 3413211162 3413211165 3413211166 3413211169 3413211171 3413211177 3413211179 839722679 478955 Order 4A4C11 UTILITY SERVICE 42480576 Fund/Dept 001.090.000.519 001.018.016.518 001.018.014.514 001.013.015.515 001.013.015.515 303.000.279.595 311.000.252.595 001.016.000.554 001.013.000.513 001.013.000.513 001.040.043.558 001.040.043.558 001.040.043.558 001.040.043.558 001.090.000.519 001.013.015.515 303.000.287.595 001.040.042.558 309.000268.595 001.090.000.518 DescriptionlAccount Amount Total : OFFICE SUPPLIES: GEN'L GOV'T OFFICE SUPPLIES: HR OFFICE SUPPLIES: FINANCE OFFICE SUPPLIES: LEGAL OFFICE SUPPLIES: LEGAL CIP 0279 - RECORDING FEE Total : Total : APRIL2019 ENGINEERING ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES JUNI Total : OFFICE SUPPLIES: CITY MGR OFFICE SUPPLIES: CITY MGR OFFICE SUPPLIES: COMM. DEV OFFICE SUPPLIES: COMM, DEV OFFICE SUPPLIES: COMM. DEV OFFICE SUPPLIES: COMM. DEV KITCHEN SUPPLIES Total : REISSUE CHECK - SUBSCRIPTION Total : 0287 -TRAFFIC EQUIMENT Total : BOOTH RENTAL FOR 2019 VALLEY Tota! : CIP 0268: DEPOSIT TO INSTALL W/ Total : 99.39 9.03 24.02 67.74 103.44 345.84 550.07 103.00 103.00 45,616.71 21,792.39 67,409.10 43.33 86.66 123.56 39.05 78.92 452.26 171.38 995.16 805.12 805.12 2,373.10 2,373.10 50.00 50.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 HELP DESK TEMP 691.20 Page: —3r vchlist 05/23/2019 9:21:06AM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 47687 5/23/2019 000964 000964 VOLT MANAGEMENT CORP (Continued) Total : 691.20 47688 5/23/2019 002651 WOODARD, ARNE EXPENSES 001.011.000.511 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 205.78 Total : 205.78 29 Vouchers for bank code : apbank Bank total : 117,137.05 29 Vouchers in this report F. the undersigned, do certify under penalty of perjury, that the materials have been furnished, the services rendered, or the labor performed as described herein and that the claim is just, due and an unpaid obligation against the City of Spokane Valley, and that I am authorized to authenticate and certify said claim. Finance Director Date Council member reviewed: Mayor Date Council Member Date Total vouchers : 117,137.05 Page: vchlist 05/2312019 4:54:44PM Voucher List Spokane Valley l Page: .-a-- Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 47689 5/23/2019 000334 ARGUS JANITORIAL LLC 47690 5/23/2019 000030 AVISTA 47691 5/23/2019 007235 BARGHAUSEN CONSULTING ENG 47692 5/23/2019 007230 JACOBS, QUINTON 47693 5/23/2019 001181 KOUDELKA, CARRIE 47694 5/23/2019 000252 LOWE'S BUSINESS ACCOUNT 47695 5/23/2019 007234 LYNCH, KELLY 47696 5/23/2019 000910 MANTZ, GLORIA 47697 5/23/2019 007233 NELSON TREE ARTISTRY LLC 47698 5/23/2019 005238 PHILLIPS, CHAD 47699 5/23/2019 000709 SENSKE LAWN & TREE CARE INC. 47700 5/23/2019 000324 SPOKANE CO WATER DIST #3 INV05306 April 2019 April 2019 SEP -2019-0008 ADE -2019-0001 Expenses May 2019 Expenses Expenses PRE -COMM -2019-0029 Expenses 9112702 9112747 May 2019 Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 001.033.000.518 JANITORIAL SVCS: CITY HALL, PR! Total : 101.042.000.542 001.016.016.521 001.040.043.345 001.040.043.345 001.018.013.513 001.016.016.521 001.040.041.543 001.040.041.543 001.040.043.345 402.402.000.531 001.016.016.521 001.033.000.518 402.402.000.531 UTILITIES: PW MASTERAVISTAAP UTILITIES: PARKS MASTER AVISTA Total : PERMIT REFUND: SEP -2019-0008 Total : PERMIT REFUND: ADE -2019-0001 Total : EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT Total : OPERATING SUPPLIES: CITY HALL Total : EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT Total : EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT Total : PERMIT REFUND: PRE COMM -2014 Total : EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT Total : LANDSCAPING SVCS AT PRECINC- LANDSCAPING SVCS AT CITY HALT Total : 9,229.99 9,229.99 26, 819.28 7,797.68 34, 616.96 350.00 350.00 315.00 315.00 473.38 473.38 423.45 423.45 14.58 14.58 218.39 218.39 250.00 250.00 21.11 21.11 479.90 1,104.83 1,584.73 WATER CHARGES FOR MAY 20191 599.43 Page: •�t-- vch list 05!23/2019 4:54:44PM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: —2 -'- Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 47700 5/23/2019 000324 000324 SPOKANE CO WATER DIST #3 (Continued) 47701 5/23/2019 001281 SPOKANE VALLEY ARTS COUNCIL May 2019 47702 5/23/2019 002306 TERRELL LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, MIC 3549 47703 5/23/2019 003175 VISIT SPOKANE April 2019 47704 5/23/2019 007231 WESTERN EXTERMINATOR COMPANY 2055381 2055903 2055952 16 Vouchers for bank code : apbank 16 Vouchers in this report Fund/Dept 001.090.000.560 309.000.296.594 105.000.000.557 001.016.016.521 001.016.016.521 001.033.000.518 Description/Account Amount Total : 599.43 2019 ECO DEV GRANT REIMBURSI 5,000.00 Total : 5,000.00 0296 -ENG & ARCH. SVCS Total : 2019 LODGING TAX GRANT REIMB 12,411.91 12,411.91 4,000.00 Total : 4,000.00 PEST CONTROL SVCS AT PRECINC PEST MGMT SVCS AT PRECINCT PEST MGMT SVCS AT CITY HALL Total : Bank total : 2,423.03 299.48 299.48 3,021.99 72,530.92 Total vouchers : 72,530.92 Page: DRAFT Attendance: Councilmembers MINUTES SPOKANE VALLEY CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING: WORKSHOP CenterPlace Regional Event Center — Room 109 2426 N Discovery Place Spokane Valley, Washington May 15, 2019 Staff Rod Higgins, Mayor Pam Haley, Deputy Mayor Brandi Peetz, Councilmember Linda Thompson, Councilmember Ben Wick, Councilmember [left at 6:26 p.m.] ABSENT: Sam Wood, Councilmember Arne Woodard, Councilmember Others Present: approximately 25 citizens Mark Calhoun, City Manager Cary Driskell, City Attorney Mike Basinger, Economic Dev. Manager Chaz Bates, Economic Dev. Specialist Mike Stone, Parks & Rec Director Patty Bischoff, Administrative Assistant Tina Gregerson, Recreation Coordinator Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Mayor Higgins called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. ROLL CALL: City Clerk Bainbridge called the roll, all Councilmembers were present except Councilmembers Wood and Woodard. It was moved by Councilmember Wick, seconded and unanimously agreed to excuse Councilmembers Wood and Woodard from the meeting. 1. Agenda Item: Parks and Recreation Master Plan Update; Goals and Policies Workshop Parks and Recreation Director Stone welcomed everyone to the meeting, and thanked them for attending; he explained that the purpose of tonight's workshop is to start the process of updating the Parks & Recreation Master Plan as it was last updated in 2013. Mr. Stone referenced tonight's PowerPoint and said for those who would like to have access to the PowerPoint, Parks and Recreation Administrative Assistant Patty Bischoff will send them a link to the presentation, as the presentation itself is likely too large to e- mail. After introducing Councilmembers and staff, Mr. Stone said these proposed basic goals will lead to the development of policies, and he turned the meeting over to Economic Development Specialist Chaz Bates. In going through the PowerPoint, Mr. Bates led the group through various exercises including choosing favorites, and a gap analysis. Individuals at four tables participated in the exercises and gave the following feedback: Table 1: reported there are not enough parks, need more green spaces, don't have parks where they are needed, and one person said she liked the idea of an indoor aquatic center. Table 2: reported they would like parks with neighborhood access; plants for sensory opportunities for kids; need more parks; need a larger budget; and safety issues were a concern, especially at night. Table 3: reported they feel we need more parks like Discovery Park, restrooms along the trails, pocket parks, themes in parks, river accessibility, and more parking availability at parks. Table 4: reported they love the volleyball courts at Browns Park; and we need more parks. Special Council Meeting, P&R Workshop: 05-15-19 Page 1 of 2 Approved by Council: DRAFT As an aside, Mr. Bates mentioned the handout entitled "Spokane Valley Libraries 2020" which he encouraged everyone to read at their leisure. As Director Stone was explaining the next steps and dates of the upcoming activities as noted on the PowerPoint slide, someone suggested handing out flyers at the various parks. Mr. Stone replied that unfortunately, they don't do that as the flyers ultimately end up on the ground. It was moved by Deputy Mayor Haley, seconded and unanimously agreed to adjourn. The meeting adjourned at 7:30 p.m. ATTEST: L.R. Higgins, Mayor Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Special Council Meeting, P&R Workshop: 05-15-19 Page 2 of 2 Approved by Council: DRAFT Attendance: Councilmembers MINUTES SPOKANE VALLEY COUNCIL MEETING STUDY SESSION Spokane Valley City Hall Council Chambers Spokane Valley, Washington May 21, 2019 Staff Rod Higgins, Mayor Pam Haley, Deputy Mayor Brandi Peetz, Councilmember Linda Thompson, Councilmember Ben Wick, Councilmember Sam Wood, Councilmember Arne Woodard, Councilmember Mark Calhoun, City Manager Cary Driskell, City Attorney John Hohman, Deputy City Manager Mike Stone, Parks & Rec. Director Jenny Nickerson, Building Official Adam Jackson, Planning/Grants Engineer Chelsie Taylor, Finance Director Erik Lamb, Deputy City Attorney Chad Phillips, Stormwater Engineer Bill Helbig, City Engineer John Whitehead, Human Resources Manager Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Mayor Higgins called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. ROLL CALL: City Clerk Bainbridge called the roll; all Councilmembers were present. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: It was moved by Deputy Mayor Haley, seconded, and unanimously agreed to approve the agenda. 1. Proposed Code Text Amendment, Addressing Standards — Karen Kendall After Building Official Nickerson, standing in for Ms. Kendall, explained the background of this proposed amendment, there was Council consensus to proceed to a first ordinance reading. 2. New Employee Report — John Whitehead Human Resources Manager Whitehead said this report is in response to a previous Council request to be informed quarterly of new employees; and he mentioned the five employees listed on the Request for Council Action form, noting that Executive Assistant Marci Patterson was inadvertently left off the list. City Manager Calhoun noted that Ms. Patterson has been here for about two months and is doing a wonderful job. 3. Draft 2020-2025 Six Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP)— Adam Jackson After Mr. Jackson went through the PowerPoint explaining the purpose of the TIP, and showing which projects are included as closeout projects, bridge and grade separation projects, intersection improvement projects, reconstruction/preservation projects, City-wide projects; sidewalk, trail and stormwater projects; there was Council consensus to proceed with the June 4th TIP hearing and proposed resolution to adopt. 4. Potential BUILD Grant — Adam Jackson Mr. Jackson explained about the call for the BUILD project grant application, as noted in his Request for Council Action form; after which there was Council consensus to bring this back to the June 4th Council meeting for a motion consideration. Mr. Calhoun added that the Pines/Grade separation project is not included in this, but as an aside, that also will be on the June 4 agenda to discuss the alternatives analysis for that project. Council Study Session: 05-21-2019 Page 1 of 2 Approved by Council: DRAFT 5. Browns Park Improvements — Mike Stone Parks and Recreation Director Stone gave some background on the Browns Park 2019 Improvements Projects, as noted in his PowerPoint; he noted bids had not been received at the writing of this Request for Council Action form, but we did have a bid opening with two bids submitted; that one was low, and the other was within budget; said the construction estimate was $999,866.76 and the low bid, including the three alternatives, was $991,000; said he is excited to come back next week for the bid award, and there was Council consensus to proceed as planned. 6. Department of Ecology Agreement, Decant Facility — Chad Phillips, Bill Helbig Mr. Phillips gave a brief overview of the purpose of these agreements, and then via his PowerPoint presentation, showed the location of the Decant facility, and went over the Phase III financials and summary including the project overview and benefits of the canopy. Council gave consensus to proceed with the motion consideration for the agreement at next week's Council meeting as planned. 7. Department of Ecology Agreement, Sprague Ave. Stormwater Improvement —Chad Phillips, Bill Helbig After Mr. Phillips went over the components of the Sprague Avenue, University to Park Stormwater Improvements Project, Council gave consensus to proceed with the motion consideration for the agreement at next week's Council meeting as planned. 8. Department of Ecology Agreement, Appleway Stormwater Improvement — Chad Phillips, Bill Helbig After Mr. Phillips went over the components of the Appleway Stormwater Improvements Project, there was brief Council discussion about ample funds for these projects. Council then gave consensus to proceed with the motion consideration for the agreement at next week's Council meeting as planned. 9. Travel Insurance for Councilmembers — Cary Driskell As per the Request for Council Action, City Attorney Driskell explained the proposed addition to the travel reimbursement policy and asked if Council supports that concept, and if so, instead of changing the entire Governance Manual now, this would simply be by motion during next week's Council meeting, and the next time we amend the Governance Manual, this would be included as an addition. All Councilmembers agreed. 10. Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins Councilmember Wick said that he previously mentioned that VisitSpokane has completed the visitor's guide or tourism brochure, and that he would like them to come and give Council a report. There was Council consensus and Mr. Calhoun suggested June 18, and again, all Councilmembers agreed. 11. Council Check-in — Mayor Higgins There were no additional remarks from Councilmembers. 12. City Manager Comments — Mark Calhoun Mr. Calhoun reminded everyone of the June 11 budget workshop, which will begin in this room at 8:30 a.m. with a goal of ending at 3:30; he also noted the June 11 evening will be cancelled. It was moved by Deputy Mayor Haley, seconded and unanimously agreed to adjourn. The meeting adjourned at 6:59 p.m. ATTEST: L.R. Higgins, Mayor Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Council Study Session: 05-21-2019 Page 2 of 2 Approved by Council: CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: June 4, 2019 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ® new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Second reading of proposed Ordinance #19-006 which amends the 2019 Budget. GOVERNING LEGISLATION: In order for the City to amend an adopted budget, State law requires the Council to approve an ordinance that appropriates additional funds. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: The Council last took formal action on the 2019 Budget when it was amended on March 26, 2019. On May 14, 2019, an Administrative Report was delivered to Council regarding the need for a budget amendment. On May 28, 2019, a public hearing was held on this topic and Ordinance #19-006 was advanced to a second reading. BACKGROUND: Since the initial adoption of the 2019 Budget on November 13, 2018 and the subsequent amendment on March 26, 2019, a number of events have transpired in the normal course of operations that necessitate a 2019 Budget amendment. They include: #001 - General Fund Provide additional appropriations (expenditures) of $403,000 comprised of: • $203,000 for the purchase and installation of a generator at City Hall. There was $200,000 in the 2018 Budget appropriated for this purchase; however, the project could not be completed before the end of 2018. The generator was discussed by Council last at the April 30, 2019 Council meeting when staff provided an update on the project. • $200,000 for the purchase and installation of a generator at the police precinct. There was $100,000 in the 2018 Budget appropriated for this purchase; however, the project could not be completed before the end of 2018 primarily due to the fact that installation costs at the precinct are much greater than what was previously anticipated. The generator was discussed by Council last at the April 30, 2019 Council meeting when staff provided an update on the project. #101 — Street O&M Fund Increase nonrecurring expenditures by $68,000 to purchase spare traffic signal equipment. The spare equipment will be used in emergencies or after equipment failure. Many of items included in the spare equipment purchase have long lead times, which could cause traffic signals to be down for weeks without spare equipment on hand to make repairs. 1 The 2019 Budget amendment reflects the changes noted above and will affect 2 funds resulting in total expenditure increases of $471,000. 001 General Fund 101 Street O&M Fund 0 403,000 0 68,000 0 471,000 OPTIONS: Options are to accept the proposed amendments in whole or in -part. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to approve Ordinance #19-006 amending Ordinance #18-024 which adopted a budget for the period January 1, 2019 through December 31, 2019, as subsequently amended by Ordinance #19-003. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: This action amends the estimated revenues and appropriations for the 2019 Budget that was adopted on November 13, 2018 and subsequently amended on May 26, 2019. There are adequate funds available to pay for these amendments. STAFF CONTACT: Chelsie Taylor, Finance Director ATTACHMENTS: • Ordinance #19-006 • Fund level line -item detail of revenues and expenditures. • Fund summaries for all funds affected by the proposed budget amendment. 2 Revenue Expenditure Fund Fund Increase Increase No. Name (Decrease) (Decrease) 001 General Fund 101 Street O&M Fund 0 403,000 0 68,000 0 471,000 OPTIONS: Options are to accept the proposed amendments in whole or in -part. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to approve Ordinance #19-006 amending Ordinance #18-024 which adopted a budget for the period January 1, 2019 through December 31, 2019, as subsequently amended by Ordinance #19-003. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: This action amends the estimated revenues and appropriations for the 2019 Budget that was adopted on November 13, 2018 and subsequently amended on May 26, 2019. There are adequate funds available to pay for these amendments. STAFF CONTACT: Chelsie Taylor, Finance Director ATTACHMENTS: • Ordinance #19-006 • Fund level line -item detail of revenues and expenditures. • Fund summaries for all funds affected by the proposed budget amendment. 2 DRAFT CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 19-006 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON, AMENDING ORDINANCE 18-024, WHICH ADOPTED A BUDGET FOR THE PERIOD JANUARY 1, 2019 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2019, AS SUBSEQUENTLY AMENDED BY ORDINANCE 19-003; AND OTHER MATTERS RELATED THERETO. WHEREAS, the City Council approved Ordinance 18-024 on November 13, 2018, which adopted the 2019 annual budget; and WHEREAS, the City Council approved Ordinance 19-003 on March 26, 2019, which amended the 2019 annual budget, and WHEREAS, subsequent to the November 13, 2018 adoption and March 26, 2019 amendment of the 2019 annual budget, it has become necessary to make changes by adding new revenue, appropriations, amendments, and transferring funds in order to properly perform City functions, services and activities; and WHEREAS, the budget changes set forth in this Ordinance could not have been reasonably anticipated or known when the 2019 annual budget was passed by the City Council; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the best interests of the City are served by amending the 2019 budget to reflect unanticipated revenue, expenditures, transfers, and appropriating the same as set forth herein. NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley, Washington do ordain as follows: Section 1. Amended Revenues and Appropriations. Ordinance No. 18-024 adopted a budget for the twelve months beginning January 1, 2019 and ending December 31, 2019, and Ordinance 19-003 amended the budget for the same period. Each item, revenue, appropriation, and fund contained in Section 1 of Ordinance 18-024, as subsequently amended by Ordinance 19-003, is hereby further amended as set forth in Attachment A to this Ordinance, which is incorporated herein. Section 2. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance. Section 3. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect five days after publication of this Ordinance or a summary thereof in the official newspaper of the City as provided by law. Ordinance 19-006 amending the 2019 budget Page 1 of 3 Passed by the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley this day of June 2019. ATTEST: L.R. Higgins, Mayor Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Approved as to form: Office of the City Attorney Date of Publication: Effective Date: Ordinance 19-006 amending the 2019 budget Page 2 of 3 ATTACHMENT A Sources Uses Fund No. Annual Appropriation Funds Beginning Fund Balance Revenues Total Sources Appropriations Estimated Ending Fund Balance Adopted via Ord. 18-024 Amended via Ord. 19-003 Amended via Ord. 19-006 Total Revenues Adopted via Ord. 18-024 Amended via Ord. 19-003 Amended via Ord. 19-006 Total Appropriations 001 General 36,817,956 45,537,322 500 0 45,537,822 82,355,778 43,033,369 7,459,300 403,000 50,895,669 31,460,109 101 Street O&M 784,972 4,918,044 120,000 0 5,038,044 5,823,016 4,918,044 31,353 68,000 5,017,397 805,619 103 Paths & Trails 5,417 9,200 0 0 9,200 14,617 0 0 0 0 14,617 104 Hotel/Motel Tax - Tourism Facilities 1,918,072 397,000 275,000 0 672,000 2,590,072 0 0 0 0 2,590,072 105 Hotel/Motel Tax 277,929 602,000 0 0 602,000 879,929 655,000 0 0 655,000 224,929 106 Solid Waste 431,359 1,726,300 0 0 1,726,300 2,157,659 1,726,300 0 0 1,726,300 431,359 107 PEG 84,831 76,000 0 0 76,000 160,831 71,100 0 0 71,100 89,731 120 CenterPlace Operating Reserve 300,000 0 0 0 0 300,000 0 0 0 0 300,000 121 Service Level Stabilization 5,500,000 0 0 0 0 5,500,000 0 0 0 0 5,500,000 122 Winter Weather Reserve 503,070 5,000 120,000 0 125,000 628,070 500,000 120,000 0 620,000 8,070 204 Debt Service LTGO 03 0 998,350 0 0 998,350 998,350 998,350 0 0 998,350 0 301 Capital Projects 2,480,268 1,022,000 0 0 1,022,000 3,502,268 1,370,947 0 0 1,370,947 2,131,321 302 Special Capital Projects 3,240,220 1,025,000 0 0 1,025,000 4,265,220 984,209 0 0 984,209 3,281,011 303 Street Capital Projects 66,906 5,432,987 6,443,000 0 11,875,987 11,942,893 5,432,987 6,443,000 0 11,875,987 66,906 309 Parks Capital Projects 39,294 1,907,096 0 0 1,907,096 1,946,390 1,812,095 0 0 1,812,095 134,295 310 Civic Facilities Capital Projects 857,737 9,000 0 0 9,000 866,737 0 0 0 0 866,737 311 Pavement Preservation 4,637,315 5,760,900 0 0 5,760,900 10,398,215 7,288,200 0 0 7,288,200 3,110,015 312 Capital Reserve 8,974,920 50,000 7,109,300 0 7,159,300 16,134,220 1,239,332 4,267,400 0 5,506,732 10,627,488 313 City Hall Construction 87,636 0 0 0 0 87,636 0 0 0 0 87,636 314 Railroad Grade Separation Projects 1,036,455 3,800,000 0 0 3,800,000 4,836,455 4,700,000 0 0 4,700,000 136,455 68,044,357 73,276,199 14,067,800 0 87,343,999 155,388,356 74,729,933 18,321,053 471,000 93,521,986 61,866,370 Sources Uses Revenues Appropriations Estimated Beginning Ending Fund Working Adopted via Amended via Amended via Total Total Adopted via Amended via Amended via Total Working No. Working Capital Funds Capital Ord. 18-024 Ord. 19-003 Ord. 19-006 Revenues Sources Ord. 18-024 Ord. 19-003 Ord. 19-006 Appropriations Capital 402 Stormwater Management 2,094,343 2,016,000 0 0 2,016,000 4,110,343 2,297,332 62,518 0 2,359,850 1,750,493 403 Aquifer Protection Area 1,840,005 787,200 0 0 787,200 2,627,205 832,600 0 0 832,600 1,794,605 501 Equipment Rental & Replacement 1,290,971 188,029 0 0 188,029 1,479,000 20,000 0 0 20,000 1,459,000 502 Risk Management 263,778 390,000 0 0 390,000 653,778 390,000 0 0 390,000 263,778 5,489,097 3,381,229 0 0 3,381,229 8,870,326 3,539,932 62,518 0 3,602,450 5,267,876 Total of all Funds 73,533,454 76,657,428 14,067,800 0 90,725,228 164,258,682 78,269,865 18,383,571 471,000 97,124,436 67,134,246 Ordinance 19-006 amending the 2019 budget Page 3 of 3 P:\Finance\2019 Budget\Amendment #2\2019 05 28 Public Hearing & 1st Reading\Public Hearing\2019 Amendment No 2 Detail v2 for RCA.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA 2019 Budget -Amendment #2 Line Item Detail 5/17/2019 Account Description Account Number Description / Justification Initial Budget Amendment Amended Budget #001 - General Fund Nonrecurring expenditures Heavy duty machinery & equipment 001.090.099.594.18.64.05 Heavy duty machinery & equipment 001.016.099.594.21.64.05 #101 - Street O&M Fund Expenditures Traffic Control Devices - Generator & installation for City Hall (carryover from 2018 Budget) Generator & installation for Precint (carryover from 2018 Budget plus revised installation cost) Total nonrecurring expenditures 0 203,000 203,000 0 200,000 200,000 403,000 Total of all General Fund revenues Total of all General Fund expenditures 0 403,000 101.042.099.542.64.48.44 - Spare traffic signal equipment Total expenditures Totals Across all Funds 0 68,000 68,000 68,000 Total revenues Total expenditures 0 471,000 Page 1 of 1 P:\Finance\2019 Budget\Amendment #2\2019 05 28 Public Hearing & 1st Reading\Public Hearing\budget summary for amended fund 2019 no2.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA 2019 Budget Amendment #2 Summary of Amended Funds #001 - GENERAL FUND RECURRING ACTIVITY Revenues Property Tax Sales Tax Sales Tax - Public Safety Sales Tax - Criminal Justice Gambling Tax and Leasehold Excise Tax Franchise Fees/Business Registration State Shared Revenues Fines and Forfeitures/Public Safety Community and Public Works Recreation Program Revenues Miscellaneous Department Revenue Miscellaneous & Investment Interest Transfers in - #105 (h/m tax -CP advertising) 5/17/2019 2019 As Adopted 1st Amendment 2nd Amendment As Amended 12, 054, 400 22, 917, 000 1,081,900 1,944,000 387,000 1,224,000 1,909,800 1,078,500 1,882,300 628,800 1,000 358,200 30,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 500 0 0 0 12,054,400 0 22,917,000 0 1,081,900 0 1,944,000 0 387,000 0 1,224,000 0 1,909,800 0 1,078,500 0 1,882,300 0 628,800 0 1,500 0 358,200 0 30,000 Total Recurring Revenues 45,496,900 500 0 45,497,400 Expenditures City Council 545,903 66,456 0 612,359 City Manager 948,835 15,692 0 964,527 City Attorney 610,549 8,207 0 618,756 Public Safety 25,927,304 184 0 25,927,488 Deputy City Manager 267,044 4,000 0 271,044 Finance / IT 1,402,497 25,203 0 1,427,700 Human Resources 297,421 8,422 0 305,843 City Hall Operations and Maintenance 290,543 1,351 0 291,894 Community & Public Works - Engineering 1,816,141 25,476 0 1,841,617 Community & Public Works - Economic Development 1,018,772 11,965 0 1,030,737 Community & Public Works - Building & Planning 2,248,698 32,776 0 2,281,474 Parks & Rec - Administration 335,958 4,162 0 340,120 Parks & Rec - Maintenance 893,500 0 0 893,500 Parks & Rec- Recreation 253,622 1,196 0 254,818 Parks & Rec - Aquatics 491,153 0 0 491,153 Parks & Rec - Senior Center 101,215 1,692 0 102,907 Parks & Rec -CenterPlace 949,414 6,918 0 956,332 General Government 1,332,650 16,300 0 1,348,950 Transfers out - #204 (LTGO debt service) 401,250 0 0 401,250 Transfers out - #309 (park capital projects) 160,000 0 0 160,000 Transfers out - #311 (pavement preservation) 972,300 0 0 972,300 Transfers out - #501 (CenterPlace kitchen reserve) 36,600 0 0 36,600 Transfers out - #502 (insurance premium) 390,000 0 0 390,000 Total Recurring Expenditures 41,691,369 230,000 0 41,921,369 Recurring Revenues Over (Under) Recurring Expenditures 3,805,531 (229,500) 0 3,576,031 Page 1 of 3 P:\Finance\2019 Budget\Amendment #2\2019 05 28 Public Hearing & 1st Reading\Public Hearing\budget summary for amended fund 2019 no2.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA 2019 Budget Amendment #2 Summary of Amended Funds #001 - GENERAL FUND - continued NONRECURRING ACTIVITY Revenues Transfers in - #106 (solid waste repayment) Total Nonrecurring Revenues Expenditures 5/17/2019 2019 As Adopted 1st Amendment 2nd Amendment As Amended 40,422 0 0 40,422 40,422 0 0 40,422 General Government - IT capital replacements 107,000 0 0 107,000 Economic Development (retail recruitment) 25,000 0 0 25,000 Public Safety (full facility generator) 0 0 200,000 200,000 Public Safety (carpet & workstation replacement) 50,000 0 0 50,000 General Government - City Hall generator 0 0 203,000 203,000 Transfers out - #122 (replenish reserve) 0 120,000 0 120,000 Transfers out - #309 (Browns Park restroom) 160,000 0 0 160,000 Transfers out -#309 (Browns Park other) 1,000,000 0 0 1,000,000 Transfers out - #312 ('17 fund bal > 50%) 0 7,109,300 0 7,109,300 Total Nonrecurring Expenditures Nonrecurring Revenues Over (Under) Nonrecurring Expenditures Excess (Deficit) of Total Revenues Over (Under) Total Expenditures Beginning unrestricted fund balance Ending unrestricted fund balance Fund balance as a percent of recurring expenditures 1,342,000 7,229,300 403,000 8,974,300 (1,301,578) (7,229,300) (403,000) (8,933,878) 2,503,953 (7,458,800) (403,000) (5,357,847) 36, 817, 956 36, 817, 956 39, 321, 909 31, 460,109 94.32% Page 2 of 3 75.05% P:\Finance\2019 Budget\Amendment #2\2019 05 28 Public Hearing & 1st Reading\Public Hearing\budget summary for amended fund 2019 no2.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA 2019 Budget Amendment #2 Summary of Amended Funds SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS #101 - STREET FUND RECURRING ACTIVITY Revenues Utility Tax Motor Vehicle Fuel (Gas) Tax Multimodal Transportation Revenue Right -of -Way Maintenance Fee Investment Interest Miscellaneous 5/17/2019 2019 As Adopted 1st Amendment 2nd Amendment As Amended 1,700,000 0 0 1,700,000 2,092,300 0 0 2,092,300 132,200 0 0 132,200 70,000 0 0 70,000 6,000 0 0 6,000 10,000 0 0 10,000 Total Recurring Revenues 4,010,500 0 0 4,010,500 Expenditures Wages / Benefits / Payroll Taxes 1,044,547 13,197 0 1,057,744 Supplies 113,300 0 0 113,300 Services & Charges 2,308,818 18,156 0 2,326,974 Snow Operations 497,200 0 0 497,200 Intergovernmental Payments 855,000 0 0 855,000 Vehicle rentals - #501 (non -plow vehicle rental) 21,250 0 0 21,250 Vehicle rentals - #501 (plow replace.) 77,929 0 0 77,929 Total Recurring Expenditures 4,918,044 31,353 0 4,949,397 Recurring Revenues Over (Under) Recurring Expenditures NONRECURRING ACTIVITY (907,544) (31,353) 0 (938,897) Revenues Transfers in - #122 0 120,000 0 120,000 Transfers in - #312 907,544 0 0 907,544 Total Nonrecurring Revenues 907,544 120,000 0 1,027,544 Expenditures Spare traffic signal equipment 0 0 68,000 68,000 Total Nonrecurring Expenditures 0 0 68,000 68,000 Nonrecurring Revenues Over (Under) Nonrecurring Expenditures 907,544 120,000 (68,000) 959,544 Excess (Deficit) of Total Revenues Over (Under) Total Expenditures 0 88,647 (68,000) 20,647 Beginning fund balance 784,972 784,972 Ending fund balance 784,972 805,619 Page 3 of 3 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: June 4, 2019 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: n consent n old business ® new business n public hearing n information n admin. report n pending legislation n executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: First Reading Ordinance No. 19-007 — Proposed Amendment to the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) - CTA -2019-0001 GOVERNING LEGISLATION: SVMC 17.80.150, SVMC 19.30.040 and RCW 36.70A.106 PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: 7-3-2018 - Admin report on Street Addressing Standards; and 5-21-19 - Admin report for City initiated code text amendment. BACKGROUND: Since incorporation, the protocol related to the assignment of street addresses for parcels and buildings in the City of Spokane Valley has been consistent with the protocol implemented in Spokane County. In 2012, E911, a group of representatives tasked with the operation of the Emergency Services Communication System, and other stakeholders initiated discussions with addressing authorities throughout Spokane County with the goal of creating a regional addressing standard that would complement newly acquired Computer -Aided Dispatch Systems (CAD) within the fire and law enforcement departments. In 2015, the Draft Public Safety Road Naming and Physical Addressing Standard was created by the addressing committee and presented to addressing authorities throughout Spokane County for consideration. City of Spokane Valley staff participated in two Joint Addressing Authorities Committee Meetings on September 17, 2015, and October 13, 2015. Addressing authorities were given the opportunity to review and discuss the Draft Public Safety Road Naming and Physical Addressing Code. Initially, the draft language gave addressing authority to the E911 Director, which created an additional layer of review and removed local control of this part of the process. This concerned staff because increases in permit review timelines would not be consistent with our streamlined process or our customer service -focused approach to permitting. Furthermore, it was determined that the City of Spokane Valley addressing protocol did not conflict with the Draft Public Safety Road Naming and Physical Addressing Code. The City recognized the need to formalize procedures and standards that align with the current addressing protocol. The City's proposed standards mirror the adopted standards in the region for consistency but the language is arranged in a way which is consistent with other regulatory language within the SVMC. The City is the last of the local jurisdictions to adopt addressing standards. On March 28, 2019, the Planning Commission conducted a study session. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on April 11, 2019 to consider the amendment. Following the public hearing and deliberations, the Planning Commission voted 6-0 to recommend that the proposed code text amendment be approved. On April 25, 2019, the Planning Commission approved the Findings of Fact and Recommendation to City Council with a 6-0 vote. CTA -2019-0001 RCA for Ordinance First Reading page 1 OPTIONS: Move to advance to a second reading with or without further amendments, or take other action deemed appropriate. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to advance Ordinance No. 19-007 to a second reading as proposed. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: N/A STAFF CONTACT: Karen Kendall, Planner ATTACHMENTS: A. PowerPoint Presentation B. Draft Ordinance No. 19-007 C. Planning Commission's Findings of Fact and Recommendation with Exhibit 1: Proposed language adding chapter SVMC 22.135 and Appendix A D. PC Meeting Minutes 3/28/2019 E. PC Meeting Minutes 4/11/2019 F. PC Meeting Minutes 4/25/2019 G. Staff Report CTA -2019-0001 with exhibits CTA -2019-0001 RCA for Ordinance First Reading page 2 siii-- _.Valley ADDRESSING STANDARDS Code Text Amendment City Council 1St Ordinance Reading June 4, 2019 Environmental Review N N N U 0 z N N U Process Planning Commission Study Session March 28, 2019 Public Hearing April 11, 2019 Findings of Fact April 25, 2019 d d d 2 Admin Report May 21, 2019 1st Reading June 4, 2019 2nd Reading June 18, 2019 Today Addressing Standards Overview NEW Chapter 22.135 ADD definitions in Appendix A LI Establish a uniform method ❑ Facilitate expedient emergency responses ❑ Regulate display of addresses ❑ Provide continuity and predictability ❑ Street naming is in Street Standards Addressing Functions City Manager administers addressing Coordination with Fire Districts Addresses real property and structures L Applies to new buildings or properties L Based upon need, non -conforming addresses may be updated to conform standards as adopted Emergency response Redevelopment ❑ Requested by owner occupant 5 DRAFT CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 19-007 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON ADDING CHAPTER 22.135 OF THE SPOKANE VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE RELATED TO ADDRESSING STANDARDS, AND AMENDING APPENDIX A - DEFINITIONS, AND OTHER MATTERS RELATING THERETO. WHEREAS, the City of Spokane Valley (City) previously adopted Title 22 of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) relating to zoning and land use regulations, and has made subsequent amendments from time -to -time as appropriate; and WHEREAS, such regulations are authorized by chapter 36.70A RCW; and WHEREAS, City staff have proposed an amendment to the SVMC to create a new chapter 22.135 SVMC for the purpose of formalizing addressing standards for the City and amending Appendix A — Definitions; and WHEREAS, on March 4, 2019, the Washington State Department of Commerce was notified pursuant to RCW 36.70A.106, providing a notice of intent to adopt amendments to Spokane Valley development regulations; and WHEREAS, on March 22 and 29, 2019, notice of the Planning Commission public hearing was published in the Valley News Herald; and WHEREAS, on March 28, 2019, the Planning Commission held a study session; and WHEREAS, on April 11, 2019, the Planning Commission held a public hearing, received evidence, information, public testimony, and a staff report with a recommendation, followed by deliberations; and WHEREAS, on April 25, 2019, the Planning Commission approved the findings and recommended that City Council adopt the amendments; and WHEREAS, on May 21, 2019, City Council reviewed the proposed amendments, Planning Commission findings, and Planning Commission recommendation; and WHEREAS, on June 4, 2019 City Council considered a first ordinance reading to adopt the proposed amendment; and WHEREAS, the amendment set forth below is consistent with the goals and policies of the City's Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, new chapter 22.135 SVMC, and Appendix A, as amended, bear a substantial relation to the public health, safety, welfare and protection of the environment. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley ordains as follows: Section 1. Purpose. The purpose of this Ordinance is to add chapter 22.135 SVMC, establishing the procedural standards to assign addressing for property identification within the City of Spokane Valley and add associated definitions in Appendix A. Section 2. Findings and Conclusions. The City Council acknowledges that the Planning Commission conducted appropriate investigation and study, held a public hearing on the proposed Ordinance 19-007 Page 1 of 8 DRAFT amendments and recommends approval of the amendments. The City Council has read and considered the Planning Commission's findings. The City Council hereby makes the following findings: A. Growth Management Act Policies - Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA) provides that each city shall adopt a comprehensive land use plan and development regulations that are consistent with and implement the comprehensive plan. B. City of Spokane Valley Goals and Policies - The City of Spokane Valley has adopted goals and policies consistent with the GMA and adopted County -Wide Planning Policies, set forth below. CF -G3 Ensure efficient and cost-effective public safety and emergency services. CF -P6 Ensure that facilities and services meet minimum Level of Service standards. C. Conclusions 1. The proposed amendment bears substantial relation to public health, safety, welfare and protection of the environment. The proposed amendment establishes procedural standards to reduce conflicts and inconsistences through addressing. Addressing is integral to the function of emergency responders, utility purveyors providing service, and citizens receiving parcel deliveries services, or general wayfinding. 2. The proposed City -initiated Code text amendment is consistent with the City's adopted Comprehensive Plan and the approval criteria pursuant to SVMC 17.80.150(F). Section 3. Adoption. Title 22 is hereby amended by adding a new chapter, to be designated "Chapter 22.135 Addressing Standards" as follows; ADDRESSING STANDARDS Sections: 22.135.010 Purpose. 22.135.020 Applicability. 22.135.030 Administration. 22.135.040 Addressing Grid Systems. 22.135.050 Addressing Standards. 22.135.060 Change in Street or Address Status. 22.135.070 Multiple Units. 22.135.080 Final Plat Addresses. 22.135.090 Display of Address. 22.135.100 List of Established Street Names, Assigned Addressing, and Mapping. 22.135.110 Deviations from Literal Compliance. 22.135.010 Purpose. A. The purpose of chapter 22.135 SVMC is to establish a uniform method for naming streets and assigning street addresses for real property and structures within the City. B. The goals of chapter 22.135 SVMC are as follows: 1. Facilitate expedient emergency response by medical, law enforcement, fire, rescue, and any other emergency services. Ordinance 19-007 Page 2 of 8 DRAFT 2. Regulate the display of property address numbers and provide for accurate street name signage, installation, and maintenance thereof. 3. Provide property owners, the general public, emergency responders, and government agencies and departments with an accurate and systematic means of identifying and locating property and/or structures. 22.135.020 Applicability. A. Chapter 22.135 SVMC applies to addresses for real property and structures situated within the City. The City may name or rename streets pursuant to the adopted Spokane Valley Street Standards, and assign or reassign addresses as necessary to further the purposes of chapter 22.135 SVMC. B. These provisions shall apply to the assignment of addresses to all new buildings or properties. C. All non -conforming addresses may be changed to conform to the standards set forth in chapter 22.135 SVMC. 22.135.030 Administration. The City Manager shall administer the provisions of chapter 22.135 SVMC, except as otherwise provided for herein. The City will coordinate with Fire Districts serving the subject area to be addressed. 22.135.040 Addressing Grid Systems. A. The City shall participate in the use of the addressing grid system described as follows: 1. Sprague Avenue divides the City into north and south addresses. 2. Division Street divides the east and west addresses. All directional designations are referenced as east because no part of Spokane Valley is located west of Division Street in Spokane All directional designations are referenced as east. 3. On streets running north and south: a. Addresses north of Sprague Avenue shall have even numbers on the east side of the street and odd numbers on the west side of the street; b. Addresses south of Sprague shall have even numbers on the west side of the street and odd numbers on the east side of the street. 4. On streets running east and west: a. Addresses shall have even numbers on the south side of the street and have odd numbers on the north side of the street. 5. The appropriate directional designation or abbreviation (e.g., "North" or "N.") is part of the address and follows the number. For example, the first lot south of Sprague Avenue on the east side of a street named "City Street" would have a street address of "10 S. City Street" or "10 South City Street." 22.135.050 Addressing Standards. A. Each property owner who has addressable property within the City and has not been assigned an address has a responsibility to apply to the City for a physical address for that property. Ordinance 19-007 Page 3 of 8 DRAFT B. Application for each address assignment prior to the issuance of a building permit (temporary addresses) shall include, at a minimum, a site map showing any proposed or existing structures, driveways, and approach locations. C. The numbering of addressable properties or structures along each street shall begin at the appropriate grid point of origin and continue in sequence. No address along a street shall be out of sequence in relation to the adjacent addresses. D. Each block along a street may have up to 100 address numbers. The hundred series shall change upon crossing a street intersection or in the best possible alignment with the established address grid if applicable, with the exception of intersecting driveways and/or alleys. The hundred series along a public street shall not change upon crossing a private street unless deemed necessary by the City Manager for continuity of address sequencing. E. Private streets wholly contained within plats shall be assigned the hundred series as if they were public streets. Except for loops and circles, two uniquely named streets may not intersect more than once (e.g., Main Street should not intersect Cherry Lane at 201 East Main Street, and also intersect Cherry Lane at 401 East Main Street). Loops and circles shall be reviewed on an individual basis and require approval by the City Manager. F. Addresses along a street shall have even numbers on one side of the street and odd numbers on the other side of the street pursuant to SVMC 22.135.040, as now adopted or hereafter amended. G. Individual address numbers shall be assigned to fit within the block range of the street segment to which the address is assigned (e.g., a new address that is assigned to the 200 block of Main Street shall be assigned a number between 201 and 233). Individual addresses shall be assigned to be consistent with adjacent blocks of the same north -south or east -west orientation. H. Addresses accessed via a shared driveway shall be assigned based on the point of origin of the driveway from the connecting street and shall be sequential. L Addressable property or structures shall be assigned based upon the street from which vehicular access to the property or structure is obtained, with the following exceptions as determined by the City Manager: 1. Commercial and public facility structures may be assigned an address based upon the street the main entrance faces and not necessarily the access street. 2. Residential structures on corner lots may be assigned an address based upon the street the main entrance faces and not necessarily the access street. J. Fractional addresses shall not be used (e.g., no "101'/2 East Main Street"). K. Address numbers shall not contain any non -numeric characters (e.g., no "118a"). L. Addresses on individual parcels shall comply with the following: 1. The street number shall range from one to five numbers. 2. No address shall have two or more zeros in a row at end of address unless referencing the location of a utility or communication facility. 3. The last two digits of street numbers shall not exceed 33. A deviation may be requested pursuant to SVMC 22.135.030. Ordinance 19-007 Page 4 of 8 DRAFT 22.135.060 Change in Street or Address Status. If a public or private street is altered, the City Manager shall review the alteration and may assign a corrected street name and/or address pursuant to chapter 22.135 SVMC. If the access to an individual address is altered, the City Manager shall assign a corrected address pursuant to chapter 22.135 SVMC (e.g., the owners of 201 East Cherry Lane change the location of their access from Cherry Lane to Houk Lane necessitating an address on Houk Lane). 22.135.070 Multiple Units. A. Duplex units shall be assigned a separate and unique address for each unit. B. Accessory dwelling units shall be assigned a unit designation with reference to the same address as the primary dwelling and shall follow the addressing standards in SVMC 22.135.070. C. Manufactured home parks which contain dwelling units fronting on a public or private street(s) shall be assigned one address for each dwelling unit. Manufactured home parks which contain dwelling units fronting on an unnamed private access street(s) shall be assigned one address for the entire property, and a secondary address assigned for individual spaces by the manufactured home park owner subject to approval by the City Manager (e.g., "9801 East Appleway Blvd., Space 1"). D. Multiple unit complexes shall be assigned one address for the property based upon the street from which vehicular access to the structure is obtained, except as otherwise provided herein. If necessary, the City Manager may assign an address based upon the street the main entrance faces (e.g., "1124 North University Street, Space 10). If additional parcels are added to an existing development, and access is taken through the existing development, a "0 Address Unknown" will be assigned to the new parcel to aid in emergency response. E. Structures within multiple unit complexes shall be assigned a building designator for each structure, as opposed to a unique address (e.g., "123 East Main Street, Building A"), unless an exception is granted by the City Manager. The building designators shall be generally arranged in a counter- clockwise rotation from the point of entry. F. When secondary addresses are assigned to multiple unit structures with individual building designations, the unit designator shall include the building designation (e.g., "123 East Main Street, Apartment A200" or "123 East Main Street, Building A, Apartment 200"). G. When secondary addresses are assigned to buildings with multiple floors, all above -ground units shall be assigned a three digit number (or higher) where the beginning number shall represent the floor upon which the unit is located (e.g., first floor units would be assigned three digit numbers beginning with 1, "Apaitment 101", tenth floor units would be assigned four digit numbers beginning with 10, "Apaitment 1001"). H. Units within below -grade stories shall include the alphabetical characters "LL" to indicate lower level, and then be assigned a three digit number where the beginning number shall represent the floor upon which the unit is located (e.g., all units in the first level below grade would be assigned three digit numbers beginning with 1, "Apartment LL101", units on the second level below grade would be assigned three digit numbers beginning with 2, "Apartment LL201"). L If a remodel of a multiple -unit structure alters the number or configuration of units, the addresses of units within said structure shall be updated to remain in compliance with chapter 22.135 SVMC. J. If a remodel of a single -unit structure creates a multiple -unit structure, the address units within said structure shall be updated to remain in compliance with chapter 22.135 SVMC. Ordinance 19-007 Page 5 of 8 DRAFT K. When secondary addresses are assigned to individual multifamily dwellings (including apartments and condominiums), the units shall use the unit designator for apartment (Apt) or unit (Unit). L. When secondary addresses are assigned to individual dwellings/spaces in manufactured home parks, the units shall use the unit designator for space (Spc). M. When secondary addresses are assigned to individual commercial suits or tenant spaces within a commercial structure(s), the units shall use the unit designator for suite (Ste). N. All other multiple -unit structures not previously described shall contain a unit designator which most closely identifies the unit's location and which is in accordance with current Postal Addressing Standards. 22.135.080 Final Plat Addresses. Temporary addresses assigned during the preliminary plat review shall be indicated on the final short plat, plat, or binding site plan drawings. The permanent physical addresses shall not be issued prior to recording the approved final short plat, plat, or binding site plan. 22.135.090 Display of Address. A. On currently -existing structures, or hereafter erected, the owner of the property or structure shall conspicuously place the correct address pursuant to chapter 22.135 SVMC. Addresses shall be displayed on all new and existing buildings. Letters, numbers, or symbols shall meet the following standards: 1. The posted address shall be metal or other durable material. 2. The numbering/lettering shall be at least four inches in height, and one-half inch in stroke width. In cases where conditions adversely affect the visibility and/or legibility of the numbers, additional numbers, larger numbers, or other modifications may be required in coordination with the City and Fire Districts serving the subject area to be addressed. 3. The posted address shall contrast with its background. 4. The address shall be placed on the structure plainly legible and visible from the street on which vehicular access is provided to the property or structure. 5. Addresses shall be visible from all directions of travel. B. Structures located in excess of 100 feet from the street fronting the property shall display the address on a sign, monument, or post not less than three feet, or greater than seven feet above the ground and located at the entrance to the property from the nearest street. The structure shall display additional posting at the structure location. C. If two or more addressable structures share a common primary access, and any one of the addressable structures is located more than 100 feet from the street designated in the assigned address, the addresses for each structure shall be posted at the intersection of the shared access and the named street on a sign or post not less than three feet or more than seven feet above the ground, and each structure shall display additional posting at the structure location. D. Address numbers, signage, location, and sizing shall be maintained by the responsible property owner. The fire districts, in coordination with the City, may require modifications to chapter 22.135 if deemed appropriate for fire and life safety. Ordinance 19-007 Page 6 of 8 DRAFT 22.135.100 List of Established Street Names, Assigned Addressing, and Mapping. Public and private streets and addresses within the City shall be maintained in a publicly viewable database which may be part of a larger database for all or a portion of Spokane County. The City may participate in any regional committees, organization, or entity to maintain, manage, review, or have control over such database. 22.135.110 Deviations from Literal Compliance. Applicants may request minor deviations from any requirement in chapter 22.135 SVMC. The applicant shall identify the requested deviation, including the basis for the request, to the City in writing. The City Manager may grant minor deviations in instances where complete compliance would create an obvious practical problem, provided the deviation still adequately addresses the property for location by emergency service providers and to promote the other purposes of chapter 22.135 SVMC. The City may consult with fire districts/other impacted agencies in approving deviations. Section 4. Amendment. SVMC Appendix A is hereby amended as follows; Addressing: Includes the following: • Address: A property location identification with the following format: address number, directional prefix, street name, street type, building designator, and secondary address (e.g.,"123 E Main St., Apt. 456"). The following elements are required: address number, street name, and street type. The following elements may be optional: directional prefix, building designator, and secondary address. • Address number: The numeric designation for an addressable parcel, structure, or unit. • Addressable: A property required to be assigned an address pursuant to chapter 22.135 SVMC. • Addressable property, addressable structures, addressable sites, addressable lots, or addressable units: The habitable or legally occupied structure on a parcel, but may also include other structures or sites as determined necessary by the City Manager. • Addressing grid system: The address number and directional system in a particular area such as a grid system or block system. • Building designator: A single character alphabetic descriptor for a single building within a multiple unit complex (e.g., " 1221 E. Sprague Avenue, Bldg. A"). • Directional prefix: A single or double character alphabetic descriptor preceding a street name consisting of any combination of the cardinal directions of North, South, East, and West which are generally used in specific street naming schemes (i.e., N, S, E, W). • Multiple units: The presence of two or more addressable structures, addressable sites, or addressable units on a single parcel. • Multiple unit complex: An apartment, condominium, or business complex where there exist multiple buildings on a single site, and two or more buildings include multiple units. • Multiple unit structure: A single structure which contains two or more units. Ordinance 19-007 Page 7 of 8 DRAFT • Street name: The word or words either existing, or in the case of new or renamed streets, which are approved by the City used in conjunction with a directional prefix and/or a street type to identify a public or private street. • Temporary address: An address assigned for the purpose of installing phone/electrical service or other utility on a parcel of land prior to an application for a building permit. Temporary addresses are subject to change at the time of building permit application. • Unit: A specific dwelling or commercial space amongst a larger group of dwellings or commercial spaces (e.g., apartment, suites. etc.). • Unit designator: An abbreviated word used in conjunction with a secondary address to describe the character of the unit, and will be in accordance with current USPS Published Standards. Section 5. Other sections unchanged. All other provisions of Title 22 SVMC and Appendix A not specifically referenced hereto shall remain in full force and effect. Section 6. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance shall be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause, or phrase of this Ordinance. Section 7. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect five days after publication of this Ordinance or a summary thereof in the official newspaper of the City of Spokane Valley as provided by law. Passed by the City Council this day of , 2019 ATTEST: L.R. Higgins, Mayor Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Approved as to Form: Office of the City Attorney Date of Publication: Effective Date: Ordinance 19-007 Page 8 of 8 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE SPOKANE VALLEY PLANNING COMMISSION CTA -2019-0001— Proposed Amendment to Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) Pursuant to SVMC 17.80.150(E) the Planning Commission shall consider the proposal and shall prepare and forward a recommendation to the City Council following the public hearing. The following findings are consistent with the Planning Commission recommendation that City Council adopt the amendment. Background: 1. Pursuant to RCW 36.70A.130, Spokane Valley adopted its 2016 Comprehensive Plan Update and updated development regulations on December 13, 2016, with December 28, 2016 as the effective date. 2. CTA -2019-0001 is a City -initiated text amendment to the SVMC, adding Chapter 22.135 establishing the procedural standards to assign addressing for property identification within the City. Addressing definitions would also be added to SVMC Appendix A. 3. The Planning Commission held a properly noticed public hearing and conducted deliberations on April 11, 2019. The Commissioners voted 6-0 to recommend that the City Council adopt the amendment. Planning Commission Findings: 1. Compliance with SVMC 17.80.150(F) Approval Criteria a. The proposed text amendment is consistent with the applicable provisions of the Comprehensive Plan. Findings: The proposed amendment is supported by the Comprehensive Plan and is consistent with the following goals and policies: CF -G3 Ensure efficient and cost-effective public safety and emergency services. CF -P6 Ensure that facilities and services meet minimum Level of Service standards. Conclusion: The proposed text amendment is supported by the Comprehensive Plan and consistent with the goals and policies. b. The proposed amendment bears a substantial relation to public health, safety, welfare and protection of the environment. Findings: The proposed amendment bears substantial relation to public health, safety, welfare and protection of the environment. The proposed amendment establishes procedural standards to reduce conflicts and inconsistences through addressing. Addressing is integral to the function of emergency responders, utility purveyors providing service, and citizens receiving parcel deliveries services or general wayfinding. Conclusion: The proposed text amendment is consistent with Comprehensive Plan and bears a substantial relation to public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment. Findings and Recommendations of the Spokane Valley Planning Commission CTA -2019-0001 Page 1 of 2 2. Recommendation: The Spokane Valley Planning Commission therefore recommends the City Council approve CTA -2019- 0001 as proposed. Attachments: Exhibit 1 — Proposed Amendment CTA -2019-0001 Approved this 25' day of April, 2019 lanni g Commission Chairman ATTEST Robin Hutchins, Office Assistant Findings and Recommendations of the Spokane Valley Planning Commission CTA -2019-0001 Page 2 of 2 Exhibit 1 Chapter 22.135 ADDRESSING STANDARDS Sections: 22.135.010 Purpose. 22.135.020 Applicability. 22.135.030 Administration. 22.135.040 Addressing Grid Systems. 22.135.050 Addressing Standards. 22.135.060 Change in Street or Address Status. 22.135.070 Multiple Units. 22.135.080 Final Plat Addresses. 22.135.090 Display of Addresses. 22.135.100 List of Established Street Names, Assigned Addressing, and Mapping. 22.135.110 Deviations from Literal Compliance. 22.135.010 Purpose. A. The purpose of chapter 22.135 SVMC is to establish a uniform method for naming streets and assigning street addresses for real property and structures within the City. B. The goals of chapter 22.135 SVMC are as follows: 1. Facilitate expedient emergency response by medical, law enforcement, fire, rescue, and any other emergency services. 2. Regulate the display of property address numbers and provide for accurate street name signage, installation, and maintenance thereof. 3. Provide property owners, the general public, emergency responders, and government agencies and departments with an accurate and systematic means of identifying and locating property and/or structures. 22.135.020 Applicability. A. Chapter 22.135 SVMC applies to addresses for real property and structures situated within the City. The City may name or rename streets pursuant to the adopted Spokane Valley Street Standards, and assign or reassign addresses as necessary to further the purposes of chapter 22.135 SVMC. B. These provisions shall apply to the assignment of addresses to all new buildings or properties. C. All non -conforming addresses may be changed to conform to the standards set forth in chapter 22.135 SVMC. 22.135.030 Administration. The City Manager shall administer the provisions of chapter 22.135 SVMC, except as otherwise provided for herein. The City will coordinate with Fire Districts serving subject area to be addressed. CTA -2019-0001 (Addressing Standards) Chapter 22.135 Draft v2 March 5, 2019 Page 1 6 22.135.040 Addressing Grid Systems. A. The City shall participate in the use of the addressing grid system described as follows: 1. Sprague Avenue divides the City into north and south addresses. 2. Division Street divides the east and west addresses. All directional designations are referenced as east because no part of Spokane Valley is located west of Division Street in Spokane. All directional designations are referenced as east. 3. On streets running north and south: a. Addresses north of Sprague Avenue shall have even numbers on the east side of the street and odd numbers on the west side of the street; b. Addresses south of Sprague shall have even numbers on the west side of the street and odd numbers on the east side of the street. 4. On streets running east and west: a. Addresses shall have even numbers on the south side of the street and have odd numbers on the north side of the street. 5. The appropriate directional designation or abbreviation (e.g., "North" or "N.") is part of the address and follows the number. For example, the first lot south of Sprague Avenue on the east side of a street named "City Street" would have a street address of "10 S. City Street" or "10 South City Street." 22.135.050 Addressing Standards. A. Each property owner who has addressable property within the City and has not been assigned an address has a responsibility to apply to the City for a physical address for that property. B. Application for each address assignment prior to the issuance of a building permit (temporary addresses) shall include, at a minimum, a site map showing any proposed or existing structures, driveways, and approach locations. C. The numbering of addressable properties or structures along each street shall begin at the appropriate grid point of origin and continue in sequence. No address along a street shall be out of sequence in relation to the adjacent addresses. D. Each block along a street may have up to 100 address numbers. The hundred series shall change upon crossing a street intersection or in the best possible alignment with the established address grid if applicable, with the exception of intersecting driveways and/or alleys. The hundred series along a public street shall not change upon crossing a private street unless deemed necessary by the City Manager for continuity of address sequencing. E. Private streets wholly contained within plats shall be assigned the hundred series as if they were public streets. Except for loops and circles, two uniquely named streets may not intersect more than once (e.g., Main Street should not intersect Cherry Lane at 201 CTA -2019-0001 (Addressing Standards) Chapter 22.135 Draft 032119 March 21, 2019 Page 2 6 East Main Street, and also intersect Cherry Lane at 401 East Main Street). Loops and circles shall be reviewed on an individual basis and require approval by the City Manager. F. Addresses along a street shall have even numbers on one side of the street and odd numbers on the other side of the street pursuant to SVMC 22.135.040, as now adopted or hereafter amended. G. Individual address numbers shall be assigned to fit within the block range of the street segment to which the address is assigned (e.g., a new address that is assigned to the 200 block of Main Street shall be assigned a number between 201 and 233). Individual addresses shall be assigned to be consistent with adjacent blocks of the same north - south or east -west orientation. H. Addresses accessed via a shared driveway shall be assigned based on the point of origin of the driveway from the connecting street and shall be sequential. Addressable property or structures shall be assigned based upon the street from which vehicular access to the property or structure is obtained, with the following exceptions as determined by the City Manager: 1. Commercial and public facility structures may be assigned an address based upon the street the main entrance faces and not necessarily the access street. 2. Residential structures on corner lots may be assigned an address based upon the street the main entrance faces and not necessarily the access street. J. Fractional addresses shall not be used (e.g., no "101 Y East Main Street"). K. Address numbers shall not contain any non -numeric characters (e.g., no "118a"). L. Addresses on individual parcels shall comply with the following: 1. The street number shall range from one to five numbers. 2. No address shall have two or more zeros in a row at end of address unless referencing the location of a utility or communication facility. 3. The last two digits of street numbers shall not exceed 33. A deviation may be requested pursuant to SVMC 22.135.030. 22.135.060 Change in Street or Address Status. If a public or private street is altered, the City Manager shall review the alteration and may assign a corrected street name and/or address pursuant to chapter 22.135 SVMC. If the access to an individual address is altered, the City Manager shall assign a corrected address pursuant to chapter 22.135 SVMC (e.g., the owners of 201 East Cherry Lane change the location of their access from Cherry Lane to Houk Lane necessitating an address on Houk Lane). 22.135.070 Multiple Units. CTA -2019-0001 (Addressing Standards) Chapter 22.135 Draft 032119 March 21, 2019 Page 3 6 A. Duplex units shall be assigned a separate and unique address for each unit. B. Accessory dwelling units shall be assigned a unit designation with reference to the same address as the primary dwelling and shall follow the addressing standards in SVMC 22.135.070. C. Manufactured home parks which contain dwelling units fronting on a public or private street(s) shall be assigned one address for each dwelling unit. Manufactured home parks which contain dwelling units fronting on an unnamed private access street(s) shall be assigned one address for the entire property, and a secondary address assigned for individual spaces by the manufactured home park owner subject to approval by the City Manager (e.g., "9801 East Appleway Blvd., Space 1"). D. Multiple unit complexes shall be assigned one address for the property based upon the street from which vehicular access to the structure is obtained, except as otherwise provided herein. If necessary, the City Manager may assign an address based upon the street the main entrance faces (e.g., "1124 North University Street, Space 10). If additional parcels are added to an existing development, and access is taken through the existing development, a "0 Address Unknown" will be assigned to the new parcel to aid in emergency response. E. Structures within multiple unit complexes shall be assigned a building designator for each structure, as opposed to a unique address (e.g., "123 East Main Street, Building A"), unless an exception is granted by the City Manager. The building designators shall be generally arranged in a counter -clockwise rotation from the point of entry. F. When secondary addresses are assigned to multiple unit structures with individual building designations, the unit designator shall include the building designation (e.g., "123 East Main Street, Apartment A200" or "123 East Main Street, Building A, Apartment 200"). G. When secondary addresses are assigned to buildings with multiple floors, all above- ground units shall be assigned a three digit number (or higher) where the beginning number shall represent the floor upon which the unit is located (e.g., first floor units would be assigned three digit numbers beginning with 1, "Apartment 101", tenth floor units would be assigned four digit numbers beginning with 10, "Apartment 1001"). H. Units within below -grade stories shall include the alphabetical characters "LL" to indicate lower level, and then be assigned a three digit number where the beginning number shall represent the floor upon which the unit is located (e.g., all units in the first level below grade would be assigned three digit numbers beginning with 1, "Apartment LL101", units on the second level below grade would be assigned three digit numbers beginning with 2, "Apartment LL201 "). If a remodel of a multiple -unit structure alters the number or configuration of units, the addresses of units within said structure shall be updated to remain in compliance with chapter 22.135 SVMC. J. If a remodel of a single -unit structure creates a multiple -unit structure, the address units within said structure shall be updated to remain in compliance with chapter 22.135 SVMC. CTA -2019-0001 (Addressing Standards) Chapter 22.135 Draft 032119 March 21, 2019 Page 4 6 K. When secondary addresses are assigned to individual multifamily dwellings (including apartments and condominiums), the units shall use the unit designator for apartment (Apt) or unit (Unit). L. When secondary addresses are assigned to individual dwellings/spaces in manufactured home parks, the units shall use the unit designator for space (Spc). M. When secondary addresses are assigned to individual commercial suits or tenant spaces within a commercial structure(s), the units shall use the unit designator for suite (Ste). N. All other multiple -unit structures not previously described shall contain a unit designator which most closely identifies the unit's location and which is in accordance with current Postal Addressing Standards. 22.135.080 Final Plat Addresses. Temporary addresses assigned during the preliminary plat review shall be indicated on the final short plat, plat, or binding site plan drawings. The permanent physical addresses shall not be issued prior to recording the approved final short plat, plat, or binding site plan. 22.135.090 Display of Address. A. On currently -existing structures, or hereafter erected, the owner of the property or structure shall conspicuously place the correct address pursuant to chapter 22.135 SVMC. Addresses shall be displayed on all new and existing buildings. Letters, numbers, or symbols shall meet the following standards: 1. The posted address shall be metal or other durable material. 2. The numbering/lettering shall be at least four inches in height, and one-half inch in stroke width. In cases where conditions adversely affect the visibility and/or legibility of the numbers, additional numbers, larger numbers, or other modifications may be required in coordination with the City and Fire Districts serving the subject area to be addressed. 3. The posted address shall contrast with its background. 4. The address shall be placed on the structure plainly legible and visible from the street on which vehicular access is provided to the property or structure. 5. Addresses shall be visible from all directions of travel. C. Structures located in excess of 100 feet from the street fronting the property shall display the address on a sign, monument, or post not less than three feet, or greater than seven feet above the ground and located at the entrance to the property from the nearest street. The structure shall display additional posting at the structure location. D. If two or more addressable structures share a common primary access, and any one of the addressable structures is located more than 100 feet from the street designated in the assigned address, the addresses for each structure shall be posted at the intersection of the shared access and the named street on a sign or post not less than CTA -2019-0001 (Addressing Standards) Chapter 22.135 Draft 032119 March 21, 2019 Page 5 6 three feet or more than seven feet above the ground, and each structure shall display additional posting at the structure location. E. Address numbers, signage, location, and sizing shall be maintained by the responsible property owner. The fire districts, in coordination with the City, may require modifications to chapter 22.135 if deemed appropriate for fire and life safety. 22.135.100 List of Established Street Names, Assigned Addressing, and Mapping. A. Public and private streets and addresses within the City shall be maintained in a publicly viewable database which may be part of a larger database for all or a portion of Spokane County. The City may participate in any regional committees, organization, or entity to maintain, manage, review, or have control over such database. 22.135.110 Deviations from Literal Compliance. Applicants may request minor deviations from any requirement in chapter 22.135 SVMC. The applicant shall identify the requested deviation, including the basis for the request, to the City in writing. The City Manager may grant minor deviations in instances where complete compliance would create an obvious practical problem, so long as the deviation still adequately addresses the property for location by emergency service providers and to promote the other purposes of chapter 22.135 SVMC. The City may consult with fire districts/other impacted agencies in approving deviations. CTA -2019-0001 (Addressing Standards) Chapter 22.135 Draft 032119 March 21, 2019 Page 6 6 Appendix A Addressing: Includes the following: • Address: A property location identification with the following format: address number, directional prefix, street name, streettype, building designator, and secondary address (e.g.,"123 E Main St., Apt. 456"). The following elements are required: address number, street name, and street type. The following elements may be optional: directional prefix, building designator, and secondary address. • Address number: The numeric designation for an addressable parcel, structure, or unit. • Addressable: A property required to be assigned an address pursuant to chapter 22.135 SVMC. • Addressable property, addressable structures, addressable sites, addressable lots, or addressable units: The habitable or legally occupied structure on a parcel, but may also include other structures or sites as determined necessary by the City Manager. • Addressing grid system: The address number and directional system in a particular area such as a grid system or block system. • Building designator: A single character alphabetic descriptor for a single building within a multiple unit complex (e.g., " 1221E. Sprague Avenue, Bldg. A"). • Directional prefix: A single or double character alphabetic descriptor preceding a street name consisting of any combination of the cardinal directions of North, South. East, and West which are generally used inspecific street naming schemes (i.e., N, S, E. W). • Multiple units: The presence of two or more addressable structures, addressable sites, or addressable units on a single parcel. • Multiple unit complex: An apartment, condominium, or business complex where there exist multiple buildings on a single site, and two or more buildings include multiple units. • Multiple unit structure: A single structure which contains two or more units. • Street name: The word or words either existing, or in the case of new or renamed streets, which are approved by the City used in conjunction with a directional prefix and/or a street type to identify a public or private street. • Temporary address: An address assigned for the purpose of installing phone/electrical service or other utility on a parcel of land prior to an application for a building permit. CTA -2019-0001 (Addressing Standards) Appendix A Draft 032119 March 21, 2019 Page 1 2 Temporary address are subject to change at the time of building permit application. • Unit: A specific dwelling or commercial space amongst a larger group of dwellings or commercial spaces (e.g., apartment, suites. etc.). • Unit designator: An abbreviated word used in conjunction with a secondary address to describe the character of the unit, and will be in accordance with current USPS Published Standards. CTA -2019-0001 (Addressing Standards) Appendix A Draft 032119 March 21, 2019 Page 2 2 Regular Meeting Minutes Spokane Valley Planning Commission Council Chambers — City Hall March 28, 2019 I. Chair Johnson called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. II. Commissioners, staff and audience stood for the pledge of allegiance. III. Office Assistant Robin Hutchins called roll and the following members and staff were present: James Johnson Cary Driskell, City Attorney Danielle Kaschmitter Jenny Nickerson, Building Official Timothy Kelley Lori Barlow, Senior Planner Robert McKinley Karen Kendall, Planner Michael Phillips, absent - excused Michelle Rasmussen Matt Walton, absent excused Deanna Horton, Secretary to the Commission Robin Hutchins, Office Assistant Hearing no objections, Commissioners Phillips and Walton were excused from the meeting. IV. AGENDA: Commissioner Rasmussen moved to approve the March 28, 2019 agenda as presented. There was no discussion. The vote on the motion was five in favor, zero opposed, and the motion passed. V. MINUTES: Commissioner Rasmussen moved to approve the March 14, 2019 minutes as written. There was no discussion. The vote on the motion was five in favor, zero opposed, and the motion passed VL COMMISSION REPORTS: Commissioner Rasmussen reported that she attended the State of the City and the presentation given from the viewpoint of the citizens and business owners was great. Commissioner Johnson attended the Gathering of the Community at the Islamic Center of Spokane for the mourning of the 51 innocents killed in Christchurch, New Zealand. Commissioner Johnson also attended the Council meeting and spoke on the topic of the gathering at the Islamic Center. He felt extremely welcome and the event was enlightening, it was enjoyable to see so many people come together. VII. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT: There was no administrative report. VIII. PUBLIC COMMENT: On any subject which is not on the agenda. There was no public comment. IX. COMMISSION BUSINESS: i. Study Session: CTA -2019-0001, a City initiated text amendment to Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) Title 22 adding a new Chapter 22.136 Addressing Standards. Planner Karen Kendall gave a presentation to the Commission explaining the proposed amendment to SVMC Title 22 by adding Chapter 22.135 Addressing Standards and incorporating definitions into Appendix A. Chapter 22.135 establishes procedural 03-28-2019 Planning Commission Minutes Page 2 of 3 addressing standards to assign property identification within the City. A determination of non -significance was issued on March 22, 2019 and notice of public hearing was posted on March 27, 2019. Ms. Kendall summarized a comment received stating it related to the numbering sequence, but staff concluded that changing the addressing sequence would cause an inconsistency in protocol and could potentially be confusing. The City's current sequence has been in existence prior to the City incorporation. The City's addressing range is 1-33 with no need for a greater range. However, should the need occur an exception is built into the code. Ms. Kendall continued that since incorporation the City has assigned addresses consistent with Spokane County's policy adding that inconsistencies in other jurisdictions have highlighted the need for regional standards. Ms. Kendall gave examples of uses that receive addressing identification which are single family residences, apartment complexes, cell towers and utilities. Ms. Kendall continued that this change will establish a uniform method of addressing, will facilitate expedient emergency responses, and regulate the display of addresses providing predictability. Ms. Kendall highlighted three types of addressing lots. Single family lots receive a single property identification adding that with the increasing popularity of accessory dwelling units(ADU), the City is proposing to address each dwelling on the property with a unit designation. This will include one street address and a unit designation such as A for the primary residence and B for the ADU. This will notify emergency responders that there may be more than one residence on the property and will ensure accurate parcel deliveries. Ms. Kendall explained that duplexes are assigned a separate and unique address for each unit. Apartment complexes are addressed with one street designation, a letter designating the building and an individual unit designation. Lastly, Ms. Kendall described multi -tenant buildings explaining the first number represents the floor followed by the unit designation. Ms. Kendall concluded with the placement of property identification numbers. Address numbers should be legible and visible from the street from all directions, made of durable material and have a contrasting background. Ms. Kendall concluded that she, the City's Building Official Jenny Nickerson and The City of Spokane Valley Fire Marshall Greg Rogers were available for questions. Commissioner Johnson asked if painted on addresses were appropriate. Fire Marshall Rogers stated as long as the address colors are contrasting they would be appropriate. Commissioner Johnson asked how individuals would be notified of this change. Building Official Jenny Nickerson advised that any existing addresses that would be made non- conforming with this proposal may remain as is with the exception of those found to be a safety hazard for emergency response. Ms. Nickerson advised those units would be contacted by staff to update their addresses to meet the current standards. Commissioner Rasmussen asked how property owners that have not been assigned addresses are notified? Ms. Nickerson advised that during the permit process all applications received are reviewed to ensure they meet the addressing standards and are accurately posted. Commissioner Rasmussen asked about the addressing of vacant lots. It was discussed that vacant parcels do not receive addresses until they are developed. There was some discussion on vacant lots with no addressing and how it may interfere with emergency response. Mr. Rogers explained that there is little impact and likened it to having an emergency on the freeway. The caller has to give a general description as to their location. Mr. Rogers added that with the new 911 systems your location will be more accurately pinpointed when using a cellular device. Commissioner Rasmussen asked why the City doesn't address vacant lots and it was concluded that per building and fire code buildings and structures receive addresses, properties do not. 03-28-2019 Planning Commission Minutes Page 3 of 3 Ms. Nickerson spoke to the public comment received regarding number sequencing. Ms. Nickerson noted that SVMC 22.135.050(L)(3) clarifies the last two digits of street numbers shall not exceed 33 however a deviation may be requested. Ms. Nickerson added that SVMC 22.135.050 does indicate each block may have up to 100 address numbers. Ms. Nickerson concluded those two sections, as written, address the public comment regarding sequence allowing for deviation should it be necessary while still in keeping with the City's parameters. Mr. Rogers thanked the staff for their time and thanked the Commission for their work in helping create a structured format to continue for generations to come. X. GOOD OF THE ORDER: There was nothing for the good of the order. XI. ADJOURNMENT: Commissioner Rasmussen moved to adjourn the meeting at 6:21 p.m. The vole on the motion was five in favor, zero opposed, and the motion passed. ames Johnson, Chairman Date signed Robin Hutchins, Secretary Regular Meeting Minutes Spokane Valley Planning Commission Council Chambers — City Hall April 11, 2019 I. Chair Johnson called the meeting to order at 6:01 p.m. II. Commissioners, staff and audience stood for the pledge of allegiance. III. Office Assistant Robin Hutchins called roll and the following members and staff were present: James Johnson Cary Driskell, City Attorney Danielle Kaschmitter Jenny Nickerson, Building Official Timothy Kelley Lori Barlow, Senior Planner Robert McKinley Karen Kendall, Planner Michael Phillips, absent - excused Michelle Rasmussen Matt Walton Deanna Horton, Secretary to the Commission Robin Hutchins, Office Assistant Hearing no objections, Commissioner Phillips was excused from the meeting. IV. AGENDA: Commissioner Walton moved to approve the April 11, 2019 agenda as presented. There was no discussion. The vote on the motion was six in favor, zero opposed, and the motion passed. V. MINUTES: Commissioner Walton moved to approve the March 28, 2019 minutes as written. There was no discussion. The vote on the motion was six in favor, zero opposed, and the motion passed VI. COMMISSION REPORTS: Commissioner Johnson reported he attended the Spokane County Human Rights Task Force meeting where the discussions focus was surrounding human rights. He stated he would be giving a presentation during the good of the order section next Commission meeting. Commissioner Johnson also attended the Council meeting where they discussed a street vacation that the Commission will be reviewing in the coming weeks. VII. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT: Senior Planner Lori Barlow reminded the Commission of an upcoming Short Course trainings. Ms. Barlow advised that the City continues to look for training opportunities for the Planning Commission members and encouraged them to attend. VIII. PUBLIC COMMENT: On any subject which is not on the agenda. There was no public comment. IX. COMMISSION BUSINESS: i. Public Heating: CTA -2019-0001, a City initiated text amendment to Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) Title 22 adding a new Chapter 22.136 Addressing Standards. Chair Johnson opened the public hearing at 6:06 p. m. 04-11-2019 Planning Commission Minutes Page 2 of 2 Planner Karen Kendall gave a presentation to the Commission reviewing the proposed amendment to SVMC Title 22 adding Chapter 22.135 Addressing Standards and incorporating definitions into Appendix A. Ms. Kendall summarized the process and spoke on the topic of the public comment received at the March 28, 2019 Study Session related to the City's numbering sequence. Staff concluded that changing the addressing sequence would cause an inconsistency in the City's protocol. Ms. Kendall added that no additional comments have been received. Ms. Kendall stated that since incorporation the City has assigned addresses consistent with Spokane County policies. Ms. Kendall continued that addressing inconsistencies in other jurisdictions have highlighted the need for regional standards. This change will establish a uniform method of addressing, will facilitate expedient emergency responses, and regulate the display of addresses providing continuity and predictability. Ms. Kendall added that all street naming is currently adopted within the City's Street Standards and nothing is being added. Ms. Kendall explained that addressing will provide identification of real properties and structures and applies to new buildings and properties. Should existing addresses be made non -conforming with this proposal those properties would be updated if found to be a safety hazard for emergency response, redevelopment, or requested by the owner or occupant. Ms. Kendall concluded the importance of addressing is to identify properties for the purpose of emergency response, utility service and parcel delivery. Having no one who wished to testify, Chair Johnson closed the public hearing at 6:12 p.m. Commissioner Walton moved to approve CTA -2019-0001 as presented and forward a recommendation to City Council. Commissioner Walton thanked the staff for the presentation and the detail provided. He believes strongly in the need for uniform standards to help maintain public safety and accurate parcel delivery, adding that it is greatly appreciated. The vote on the motion was six in favor, zero opposed, and the motion passed X. GOOD OF THE ORDER: There was nothing for the good of the order. XI. ADJOURNMENT: Commissioner Walton moved to adjourn the meeting at 6:14 p.m, The vote on the motion was six in favor, zero opposed, and the motion passed. James Jo son, Chairman Date signed Robin Hutchins, Secretary Regular Meeting Minutes Spokane Valley Planning Commission Council Chambers — City Hall April 25, 2019 I. Chair Johnson called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. II. Commissioners, staff and audience stood for the pledge of allegiance. III. Office Assistant Robin Hutchins called roll and the following members and staff were present: James Johnson Jenny Nickerson, Building Official Danielle Kaschmitter Lori Barlow, Senior Planner Timothy Kelley, absent - excused Karen Kendall, Planner Robert McKinley Michael Philips, absent - excused Michelle Rasmussen, absent - excused Matt Walton Robin Hutchins, Office Assistant Hearing no objections, Commissioners Kelly, Rasmussen and Phillips were excused from the meeting. IV. AGENDA: Commissioner Walton moved to approve the April 25, 2019 agenda as presented. There was no discussion. The vote on the motion was four in favor, zero opposed, and the motion passed V. MINUTES: Commissioner Walton moved to approve the April 11, 2019 minutes as written. There was no discussion. The vote on the motion was four in favor, zero opposed, and the motion passed. VI. COMMISSION REPORTS: Commissioner Johnson reported he attended the last few City Council meetings. Commissioner Johnson also attended the Spokane County Human Rights Task Force executive committee where they discussed considering a region wide leadership meeting. He is pleased to be a part of this team that is looking out for human rights in the area and is excited to be a part of the coming changes. VII. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT: There was no administrative report. VIII. PUBLIC COMMENT: On any subject which is not on the agenda. There was no public comment. IX. COMMISSION BUSINESS: i. Findings of Fact: CTA -2019-0001, a proposed text amendment to Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) Title 22 and Appendix A, regarding addressing standards. Planner Karen Kendall provided a brief overview of the amendment and discussed the procedural guidelines for the proposed text amendment to SVMC Title 22 and Appendix A. Ms. Kendall explained that this meeting is to finalize the recommendation from the Commission. Following public comment at the public hearing held April 11, 2019 the Commission deliberated and voted six in favor and zero opposed to approve CTA -2019- 0001 as presented and forward a recommendation to the City Council. 04-25-2019 Planning Commission Minutes Page 2 of 6 There was no further discussion. Commissioner Walton moved to approve CTA -2019-0001 Planning Commission Findings of Fact recommendation as presented to the City Council. The vote on the motion was four in favor, zero opposed, and the motion passed. ii. Study Session: STV -2019-0001, a proposed street vacation of a portion of Tschirley Road, Long Road, Rich Avenue, and Greenacres Road in the Northeast Industrial Area. Senior Planner Lori Barlow gave a presentation to the Commission outlining the Northeast Industrial Area City Initiated Street Vacation. Ms. Barlow explained that this area is located between Flora Road and Barker Road and is South of Trent Avenue. The proposed vacations are the unimproved Right of Ways (ROW) of Tschirley Road, Long Road, Greenacres Road and Rich Avenue that connects Long Road with Greenacres Road, Ms. Barlow noted that this property is predominantly owned by one property owner. However, there is one parcel located off of Rich Avenue with a separate property owner. Mr. Barlow highlighted this being a City Initiated Street Vacation the City is working to ensure there is easement access for the property that would be affected by the vacation. Staff stated that these ROW's are not necessary as all parcels will have access off of Garland Avenue once construction is completed. Ms. Barlow provided brief background information on the Garland Avenue project that was also a City initiated proposal. The proposal is currently undergoing environmental review and is expected to begin construction soon. It should be completed by the end of 2019. Ms. Barlow continued, that there is not an application on file at this point, and it is uncertain how the properties will be reconfigured. It is anticipated that once development is considered the property owner will come forward with a Binding Site Plan (BSP) to r identify access points to the properties in the development. Commissioner Walton asked if there will be a stipulation on the property owner to continue providing access for emergency services off of Garland Avenue. Ms. Barlow spoke to the BSP review process at which time parcels would be divided up and access points would be determined prior to development occurring. Ms. Barlow added this proposal has been routed to all agencies, and the Spokane Valley Fire Department advised they would manage situations as development occurs. Commissioner Johnson asked if the access will be maintained by the City. Ms. Barlow explained that if done through the BSP it would be a private street maintained by the property owners. Garland Avenue is a public road and would be maintain by the City. Commissioner Johnson spoke about the amount of property involved and asked if there would be any monetary compensation to the City. Ms. Barlow explained that is not being forwarded as a recommendation as this is a City initiated proposal with no expectations of reimbursement from the property owner. Ms. Barlow concluded that the current ROW may be an impediment to the future development. The City is trying to make this area more adaptable for future developments. iii. Study Session: CTA -2018-0006, a proposed code text amendment to Spokane Valley Municipal Code Chapters 19.60.050, 19.65.130, 19.40.035 and Appendix A, regarding affordable housing. 04-25-2019 Planning Commission Minutes Page 3 of 6 Ms. Barlow provided background information into the privately initiated Code Text Amendment (CTA) Ms. Barlow corrected the numbering error to be CTA-2018-0006 not CTA-2019-0006. Ms. Barlow advised this proposal was originally submitted in 2018, , then revised and resubmitted earlier in 2019. Ms. Barlow advised that staff had reviewed the application for environmental impact and a determination of non-significance was issued March 29, 2019. The notice of public hearing was posted in the newspaper as well as on the City's website. Ms. Barlow clarified that this proposal is a CTA which is not site-specific, therefore on site posting requirements do not apply. Ms. Barlow clarified procedural requirements. The Commission is conducting the study session, and the public hearing is scheduled for May 9, 2019. Once a recommendation is made by the Planning Commission, it will be formalized in the Findings of Fact scheduled for May 23, 2019. Ms, Barlow highlighted a recent change the City Council has made to the Governance Manual. The Council will no longer take public comment on items that have had a public hearing by the Planning Commission during their review process. Ms. Barlow stressed that the opportunity for public comment will only be during the Planning Commissions public hearing. Once that hearing is closed, there will be no further opportunity for public comment. Ms. Barlow continued, the proposals intent is to allow multifamily in the residential (R-3) zone as long as it meets supplemental regulations. Ms. Barlow explained that currently multifamily is not allowed in the R-3 zone. Multifamily is only allowed in multifamily residential and both mixed use zones. Ms. Barlow continued that this proposal would change the Permitted Use Matrix SVMC 19.60.050 by adding an "S" indicating multifamily could be allowed but subject to supplemental use regulations. Ms. Barlow described that this proposal would add supplemental language to SVMC 19.65.130 stating that multifamily could be allowed if it complies with Chapter 19.40 of SVMC Alternative Residential Development Options. Newly added section 19.40.035 identifies that multifamily in the R-3 zone would be allowed if specific criteria are met for applicability, site and building standards and other related agreements. Ms. Barlow continued that in order for a development to utilize this section of the code at least 51% of the units proposed must be used for affordable housing. Commissioner Johnson asked how the City would monitor that the 51% is being maintained? Ms. Barlow explained that this would be part of the agreement section. An agreement would be signed and recorded with the County, that during the lifetime of the project they would maintain 51% of the units as affordable housing units. Ms. Barlow continued that similarly during multifamily application review with affordable housing units the applicant provides evidence that the units meet an affordable housing standard. Commissioner Johnson asked what is included in affordable housing costs? Ms. Barlow stated it refers to the Federal definition that annual housing costs shall not exceed 1/3 of a families' annual income and is calculated by the US Department of Housing and Urban Development. Commissioner. Johnson asked if the percentage included utilities, etc., or just the direct housing cost. Ms. Barlow said she was uncertain and that she will provide that information at the next meeting. Ms. Barlow explained some of the criteria. Key criteria would require the property to be a single parcel, under single ownership. The parcel uses must include a church, school and the multifamily units all located on one parcel at least 10-20 acres in size. Ms. Barlow continued that the entire site can be used to calculate the six dwelling units per acre as the maximum density allowed in the R-3 zoning district. Currently the R-3 zone does not allow multifamily development but does allow single family development at a density of six dwelling units per acre. Ms. Barlow explained this amendment proposes to utilize the 04-25-2019 Planning Commission Minutes. Page 4 of 6 entire site to calculate what could have been allowed for single family development, but then allows the units to be clustered in the form of a multifamily development. The proposal intends to maintain the density. For example, if you have a 10 -acre parcel allowing six dwelling units per acre it would allow for 60 single family residential dwelling units. The proposal would allow you to develop a site that has a school and church with 60 single family dwelling units in a multifamily complex which would still maintain the density that is established within the R-3 Zone. Commissioner Walton asked how many 10-20 acre parcels are in the valley that would qualify. Ms. Barlow advised she did provide analysis in the staff report and used a query that identified a church on the property and any adjacent properties owned by same owner. Staff did find trough this query that there are 75 church sites in the city and of those 75, 25 of them fit within the 10-20 acres. Only one site had a church, school, and fit the criteria. However, a site could be developed. Commissioner Walton asked how many vacant parcels meet the criteria that do not currently have a school/church combination? Ms. Barlow concluded it would be difficult to compile that information as properties could be aggregated. Ms. Barlow continued that on site the school, church and multifamily may share parking and open space to help prevent overbuilding. Commissioner Kaschrnitter asked for clarification if parking can be used for open space. Ms. Barlow advised that would not be the case and explained how the City would calculate need during the review process for uses to share without building additional parking spaces. There was some additional discussion related to the intent, and that the hours of operation vary for each use with some concern of overflow street parking. Ms. Barlow mentioned the Conditional Use Permit (CUP) process would allow the opportunity to determine adequate parking and what "share "specifically means. Commission Johnson asked if staff knows of any advantage to limiting the size of this development to 20 acres, and why require both a church and a school? Ms. Barlow reminded the Commission that this is a privately initiated CTA and that during the public hearing the applicant can address questions as to what their intent may be. Ms. Barlow continued with other criteria that applies when specific circumstances exist, such as natural amenities shall be incorporated into the site, buildings, including parking structures, shall have design continuity to look as if they are part of a campus, pedestrian. areas shall be delineated and protected to provide clear areas for pedestrian activity. Ms. Barlow continued with development standards and noted that the proposal identified that it must meet residential standards in the dimensional and standards table 19.70-01, which includes building height of 35 feet, and setbacks, to maintain the surrounding character already in place. Ms. Barlow continued that the minimum lot size of 5,000 square feet is not applicable. Ms. Barlow continued that the density is still applicable 6 dwelling units per acre and lot coverage of 50% or greater. However, that should not be an issue with lot sizes of 10-20 acres. Ms. Barlow explained other requirements would be agreements to ensure compliance and that the conditions will run with the land and will not transfer with the owner. The agreement would be specific to the land, and that the affordable housing component will remain for the life of the project, Lastly, Ms. Barlow concluded this would be processed as a type three permit that requires a CUP. Ms. Barlow gave an overview of the CUP process and advised the permit would be considered by the hearing examiner, requires public notice, a public hearing, and can be denied or conditioned. Ms. Barlow explained that through the Hearing Examiner process 04-25-2019 Planning Commission Minutes Page 5 of 6 uses that may have unanticipated impacts could be conditioned to mitigate those impacts, or the permit could be denied completely. Mr. Walton asked for clarification how this would run with the land? Would the City put a covenant on the property moving forward? Should the 10-20-acre property have affordable housing built on one portion and later wanted to sell off the undeveloped portions of the property would they be able to do so as they utilized the 10-20 acre and max number of units. Ms. Barlow said agreements would be recorded and the site would be bound to the agreement; in theory property could be sold off it wasn't needed to meet the minimum requirements of the criteria. Commissioner Walton asked if they have 20 acres and they only use the minimum 10 acres and build 60 dwelling units could they create a secondary project within the 20 acres and use the additional 60 dwelling units available to them? Ms. Barlow explained that yes, the CUP process would allow for that. Ms. Barlow gave an example that if someone came in with a proposal of 20 acres and only proposed to build to a density that is less than max, they could come back and ask for modification to CUP. Commissioner Walton asked if they chose to use a portion of property and the dwelling units available to them which would only utilize half of the property, and sell 10 acres of the overall portion, is that locked in since they applied under the 20 acres. Ms. Barlow explained the City would have to review what the original capacity to determine if they had extra land to eliminate from the site and still meet the conditions. Ms. Barlow highlighted that if a CUP is granted that is identifying all criteria are met it is the baseline to determine what they could do moving forward. The process may require the Hearing Examiner revisit the CUP Commissioner Johnson asked how would the City know if someone decides to sell five acres. Ms. Barlow advised the criteria defines this would have to be one parcel under single ownership. The owner would have to go through segregation process in order to divide off a piece of land, The City would be involved in that process and would be aware of the underlying CUP, and the encumbrances recorded with County Auditor. Commissioner Johnson spoke to the topic of a comment made by Ann Fritzel with the Commerce Department and read a statement from her comment: "affordable housing gross density of 6 units per acre on the five-acre parcel". Commissioner Johnson provided a Birdseye view and zoning map of the only viable location that fits all of the criteria. He explained that there are five parcels that would be owned by the entity. Commissioner Johnson stated he has dealt with Catholic Charities and their hearts are always in the right place. He continued explaining that if the five parcels depicted on the map are converted to one single parcel there would not be much room left for development. He continued the three parcels on Walnut Road, the parcel facing Far Road, and on Valleyway Avenue are all somewhat developed. The only parcel remaining without development must be the five acres referenced by Ms. Fritzel. Commissioner Johnson continued that the 17 acres combined could develop 103 dwelling units on that five-acre parcel and asked if that would make this a high density development in an R-3 zone with no transitional requirements? Ms. Barlow explained that transitional regulations are not required, however a CUP would be required. Ms. Barlow continued that if it were to show impacts such as a three story building backed up to single family residence with obvious conflict some transitional regulations could be required by the Hearing Examiner. Ms. Barlow explained the development in question does have 5 pieces of property however they could aggregate and reduce the size or increase the size. She added that it is difficult not to focus on the one existing opportunity, but it is not our only focus as there is no proposal at this time. Commissioner Johnson wanted to make sure the commission is considering the worst case scenario. Should this move forward and be approved by the City Council, it does become 04-25-2019 Planning Commission Minutes Page 6 of 6 less probable that public testimony will be taken due to it already been approved. Commissioner Johnson's concern also lends to public notification and hopes the applicant contacts the neighboring properties. Commissioner Walton asked if there is anything that would prevent the applicant from applying for a rezone to multifamily residential to meet R-3 zone criteria? Ms. Barlow explained they couldn't apply for a rezone due to land use designation. A rezone could be considered through a Comprehensive Plan Amendment, however that process is only allowed on an annual basis Commissioner Johnson asked for clarification on approved land use regarding cottage developments being allowed in the R-3, multifamily and both mixed use zones? Ms. Barlow explained cottage developments are allowed in those zones and at twice the underlying density of the R-3 zone. A cottage development could be proposed in the R-3 zone with up to 12 dwelling units per acre and it is required to be aggregated around the site to speak to open space requirements. Commissioner Johnson asked if that is calculated on the aggregate land and the entire parcel. Ms. Barlow stated it is assumed that it is on the entire site and only being used for cottage development. There was discussion regarding affordable housing and it was noted that there is no affordable housing component in cottage development. Commissioner McKinley asked if this proposal conflicts with the previous density related Duplex CTA proposed in the R-3 zone that the Commission voted against? Ms. Barlow explained the Duplex CTA was attempting to limit the number of duplexes that could be allowed on a per acre basis. Currently attached and detached single family development is allowed in the R-3 zone as long as you meet the minimum lot size. The previous Duplex CTA was limiting the number of duplexes developed even if the minimum lot size was met. The CTA being reviewed tonight is proposing to add a use that is not currently allowed in the R-3 zone. The only commonality is the R-3 zone component. X. GOOD OF THE ORDER: Commissioner Johnson encouraged the Commission to bring items to share for the Good of the Order as he feels it is important. Commissioner Johnson read aloud a heartfelt statement he wrote illustrating his sentiments of pride and concerns for his hometown the City of Spokane Valley. XI. ADJOURNMENT: Commissioner Walton moved to adjourn the meeting at 7:10 p.m. The vote on the motion was four in favor, zero opposed, and the motion passed. Id I I P ,„S'74'/I/Z.0/7 ames Johnson, Chairman Date signed 4A-e-12-eLA--\„ ) Robin Hutchins, Secretary Spokane Valley COMMUNITY AND PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING & PLANNING STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION CTA -2019-0001 STAFF REPORT DATE: March 21, 2019 HEARING DATE AND LOCATION: April 11, 2019, beginning at 6:00 p.m., Spokane Valley City Hall Council Chambers, 10210 East Sprague Avenue, Spokane Valley, Washington 99206. PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: The proposed amendment is a City -initiated text amendment to the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) adding chapter 22.135 SVMC establishing the procedural standards to assign addressing for property identification within the City. Addressing definitions will be added to SVMC Appendix A. APPROVAL CRITERIA: Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan, SVMC 17.80.150, 19.30.040. SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS: Staff concludes that the proposed amendments to chapter 22.135 SVMC and SVMC Appendix A are consistent with minimum criteria for review and approval, and consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. STAFF CONTACT: Karen Kendall, Planner. REVIEWED BY: Jenny Nickerson, Building Official. ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit 1: Agency Comments. APPLICATION PROCESSING: Chapter 17.80 SVMC, Permit Processing Procedures. The following table summarizes the procedural steps for the proposal. Process Date Department of Commerce 60 -day Notice of Intent to Adopt Amendment March 4, 2019 SEPA — DNS Issued March 22, 2019 Published Notice of Public Hearing: March 22, 2019 & March 29, 2019 BACKGROUND: Since the City's incorporation in 2003, the protocol related to the assignment of street addresses for parcels and buildings in the City has been consistent with the regional protocol implemented in Spokane County. Street numbers begin at the intersection of Division Street and Sprague Avenue in the City of Spokane. Street names have followed the grid designations as the area has developed over the years. The City works closely with local fire districts for consistency and proper documentation to ensure emergency responders are able to quickly locate all parcels within the City. Staff Report and Recommendation CTA -2019-0001 Several years ago, a developer working near downtown Spokane and in Liberty Lake did not follow the historical protocol and, in a few instances, emergency responders had difficulty locating the properties to provide emergency services to residents in need. In 2012, E911 and other stakeholders initiated discussions with addressing authorities throughout Spokane County with the goal of creating a regional addressing standard that would complement newly acquired Computer -Aided Dispatch Systems (CAD) within the Fire and Law Enforcement Departments. In 2015, the Draft Public Safety Road Naming and Physical Addressing Standard was created by the addressing committee and presented to addressing authorities throughout Spokane County for consideration. City of Spokane Valley staff participated in two Joint Addressing Authorities Committee Meetings on September 17, 2015 and October 13, 2015. Addressing authorities were given the opportunity to review and discuss the Draft Public Safety Road Naming and Physical Addressing Code. Initially, the draft language gave addressing authority to the E911 Director, which created an additional layer of review and removed local control of this part of the process. This concerned staff here because increases in permit review and issuance timelines would not be consistent with our streamlined process, and inconsistent with our customer service approach. A meeting was held with Bryan Collins, Chief of the Spokane Valley Fire Department (SVFD) and Police Chief Mark Werner to discuss the merits of adopting the draft standards. It was agreed that, while the existing procedures have not resulted in any problems, it would be beneficial to adopt a version of the regional standard. Local jurisdictions such as Spokane County, City of Spokane, Liberty Lake, Cheney and Deer Park have adopted versions of the regional standards. ANALYSIS: The addressing standards formalize procedures that align with the City's current addressing protocol. The City's standards mirror the adopted regional standards for consistency. The proposal is tailored to the City of Spokane Valley regarding addressing authority going to the City Manager or designee in coordination of the Fire Districts and United States Postal Service (USPS). The City addresses new lots created through platting actions, vacant lots at time of permitting, owner -initiated address changes, and City -initiated address changes to correct errors and provide better emergency responses. The City's addressing standards are proposing two new components to further align with the regional addressing protocol. The City recognized the need to assign a unit designation for properties with an accessory dwelling unit (ADU). This indicates to first responders which unit to respond to and allows each resident the ability to have unencumbered postal deliveries. The second addition to the standards is assigning temporary addressing. This ensures property identification for emergency responders during site construction and allows utility companies to install services in appropriate locations. A. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO THE MUNICIPAL CODE TEXT AMENDMENT 1. Compliance with Title 17 (General Provisions) of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code a. Findings: SVMC 17.80.150(F) Municipal Code Text Amendment Approval Criteria The City may approve a Municipal Code Text amendment if it finds that: i. The proposed text amendment is consistent with the applicable provisions of the Comprehensive Plan; Staff Analysis: The proposed amendment is supported by the Comprehensive Plan and is consistent with the following goals and policies: CF -G3 Ensure efficient and cost-effective public safety and emergency services. Page 2 of 3 Staff Report and Recommendation CTA -2019-0001 CF -P6 Ensure that facilities and services meet minimum Level of Service standards. ii. The proposed amendment bears a substantial relation to public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment: Staff Analysis: The proposed amendment bears substantial relation to public health, safety, welfare and protection of the environment. The proposed amendment establishes procedural standards to reduce conflicts and inconsistences through addressing. Addressing is integral to the function of emergency responders, utility purveyors providing service, and citizens receiving parcel deliveries services or general wayfinding. b. Conclusion(s): The proposed text amendment is consistent with the approval criteria contained in the SVMC 17.80.150(F). 2. Finding and Conclusions Specific to Public Comments a. Findings: No public comments have been received to date. b. Conclusion(s): Adequate public noticing was conducted for CTA -2019-0001 pursuant to adopted public noticing procedures. 3. Finding and Conclusions Specific to Agency Comments a. Findings: The City has received two agency comments to date. The City updated the draft language to fix a grammatical and formatting error. In addition, staff added language to Section 22.135.020 of the new Addressing Standards to address comments from Spokane County Information Technology Department, representing the Public Safety GIS staff. b. Conclusion(s): Comments have been addressed and no concerns noted. B. CONCLUSION For the reasons set forth in Section A the proposed code text amendment to add addressing standards is consistent with the requirements of SVMC 17.80.150(F) and the Comprehensive Plan. Page 3 of 3 EXHIBIT I. Karen Kendall From: Chad Riggs Sent: Tuesday, March 5, 2019 5:06 PM To: Karen Kendall Subject: RE: SEPA Request for Comments - File No. CTA -2019-0001 (City Initiated Code Text Amendment) Ok. I found one misspelled word. The word "form" should be "from". H. Addressable property or structures shall be assigned based upon the str- form w' ich vehicular access to the property or structure is obtained, with the following - s as determined by the City Manager: 1. Commercial and public facility structures may be assigned an address based upon the street the main entrance faces and not necessarily the access street. 2. Residential structures on corner lots may be assigned an address based upon the street the main entrance faces and not necessarily the access street. Fractional addresses shall not be used (e.g., no "101'% East Main Street"). J. Address numbers shall not contain any non -numeric characters (e.g., no "1-18a"). K. Addresses on individual parcels shall comply with the following: 1. The street number shall range from one to five numbers. 2. No address shall have two or more zeros in a row at end of address unless referencing the location of a utility or communication facility_ 3. The last two digits of street numbers shall not exceed 33. A deviation may be requested as per SVMC 22.135.030. 22.135.060 Change in Street or Address Status. If a public or private street is altered, the City Manager shall review the alteration and may assign a corrected street name and/or address consistent with the provisions of chapter 22.135 SVMC. tithe access to an individual address is altered, the City Manager shall assign a corrected address consistent with the provisions of chapter 22.135 SVMC (e.g., the owners of 201 East Cherry Lane change the location of their access from Cherry Lane to Houk Lane necessitating an address on Houk Lane). CIA -201P -Non (Addis n_ Stancarth) Chapter 22.136 Drag v2 Thank you, Chad Riggs, P.E. 1 Senior Engineer 10210 E. Sprague Avenue 1 Spokane Valley, WA 99206 (509) 720-5033 1 criggsaspokanevalley.org 1 `larch 5. '_019 Pan _ 6 Spokane This email and any attachments may be subject to disclosure pursuant to Washington State's Public Record Act, Chapter 42.56 RCW. From: Karen Kendall Sent: Tuesday, March 5, 2019 4:55 PM To: Chad Riggs <criggs@spokanevalley.org> Subject: RE: SEPA Request for Comments - File No. CTA -2019-0001 (City Initiated Code Text Amendment) Are you sure?!? O From: Chad Riggs Sent: Tuesday, March 5, 2019 4:54 PM To: Karen Kendall <kkendall@spokanevallev.org> Subject: RE: SEPA Request for Comments - File No. CTA -2019-0001 (City Initiated Code Text Amendment) Hi Karen, DE does not have any comments for CTA -2019-0001. Thank you, Chad Riggs, P.E. I Senior Engineer 10210 E. Sprague Avenue I Spokane Valley. WA 99206 (509) 720-5033 1 criggsna,spokanevallev.org, Spokane :.0 Valley This email and any attachments may be subject to disclosure pursuant to Washington State's Public Record Act, Chapter 42.56 RCW. From: Karen Kendall Sent: Tuesday, March 5, 2019 4:49 PM To: 'Avista Dave Byus' <dave.bvus@avistacorp.com>; 'Central Valley School District #356' <irowell@cvsd.org>; 'CenturyLink' <Karen.Stoddard@centurylink.com>; Chad Riggs <criggs@spokanevalley.org>; 'Chris Johnston' <criohnston@spokanesheriff.org>; 'Chris Knudson' <CKnudson@spokanecounty.org>; 'Christina Janssen (City of Millwood)' <planning@millwoodwa.us>; 'Cindy Anderson (cyan461@ecy.wa.gov)' <cyan461@ecy.wa.gov>; 'City of Liberty Lake ' <LKey@libertylakewa.gov>; 'City of Spokane Tirrell Black' <tblack@spokanecity.org>; 'Colin Depner' <CDEPNER@spokanecounty.org>;'Comcast' <bryan richardson@cable.comcast.com>; 'Consolidated Irrigation District #19'<consolidatedirrigation@comcast.net>; 'Deborah Johnson' <SEPA.reviewteam@doh.wa.gov>; 'Derek Lilleberg (Conoco Phillips)' <Derek.Lilleberg@p66.com>; 'East Spokane Water District #1' <dist1@comcast.net>; 'East Valley School District #361' <smithLO@evsd.org>; 'Felts Field - Ryan Sheehan' <rsheehan@spokaneairports.net>; 'Hutchinson Irrigation District'<hutchinsonid16@gwestoffice.net>; 'Inland Power & Light' <connien@inlandpower.com>; 'Irvin Water District' <irvinwater@windwireless.net>; 'Jacob McCann (Jmca461@ecy.wa.gov)' <Jmca461@ecy.wa.gov>; Jenny Nickerson <jnickerson@spokanevalley.org>; 'Larry Ostwald (Conoco Phillips)' <Larry.E.Ostwald@p66.com>; 'Leslie King (Leslie.King@dfw.wa.gov)' <Leslie.King@dfw.wa.gov>; 'Marty Long' <mlong@scfd8.org>; Mike Stone 2 <mstone@spokanevalley.org>; 'Modern Electric Water Co. ' <transmittals@mewco.com>; 'Modern Irrigation District' <info@modirr.org>;'orchardaveirrigationdist6@comcast.net'<orchardaveirrigationdist6@comcast.net>; 'Patnode, Brian (PARKS)' <Brian.Patnode@PARKS.WA.GOV>; Ray Wright <rwright@spokanevalley.org>; 'Spokane Aquifer Joint Board' <info@spokaneaquifer.org>; 'Spokane County Planning & Building' <jpederson@spokanecounty.org>; 'Spokane County Water District #3' <scwd3@comcast.net>; 'Spokane Regional Clean Air Agency' <awestby@spokanecleanair.org>; 'Spokane Regional Health District' <psavage@srhd.org>; 'Spokane Regional Transportation Council' <rstewart@SRTC.org>; 'Spokane Transit Authority'<kotterstrom@spokanetransit.com>; 'Spokane Tribe of Indians' <randya@sookanetribe.com>; 'Spokane Valley Fire Disttict' <inspections@spokanevalleyfire.com>; 'Traci Harvey, Spokane Valley Fire Dept No. 1' <HarveyT@spokanevalleyfire.com>; 'Vera Water & Power'<kwells@verawaterandoower.com>; 'WA Commerce' <reviewteam@commerce.wa.gov>; 'WA Dept of Arch and Hist Preservation ' <Gretchen.Kaehler@DAHP.wa.gov>; 'WA Ecology, Olympia' <sepaunit@ecv.wa.gov>; 'WA Fish & Wildlife' <SEPAdesk@dfw.wa.gov>; 'WA Natural Resources' <northeast.region@dnr.wa.gov>; 'WA Transportation' <FiggG@wsdot.wa.gov>; 'West Valley School District' <Timothy.Morgan@wvsd.org>; 'Araceli Tapuro' <araceli.e.tapuro@usps.gov>; 'Bob Hardin' <Bob.L.Hardin@usps.gov>; 'Chris Wafstet (Modern Electric'<cwafstet@mewco.com>; 'Christine' <CMCMAHONCHASE@spokanecounty.org>; 'David Robles' <david.g.robles@usos.gov>; 'Degon' <JDegon@spokanecounty.org>; 'Dosch, Ryan A' <RDOSCH@spokanecounty.org>; 'Edward Freeman' <edward.s.freeman@usos.gov>; 'Frank Moulton' <fmoulton@sookanecounty.org>; 'Humphries, Guy B' <Guy.B.Humphries@usos.gov>; 'James Schiller' <James.C.Schiller@usos.gov>; 'Jodi Safarik' <jsafarik@spokanecounty.org>; 'Leonard Warren (Metro PO' <leonard.e.warren@usps.gov>; 'Lindsay Anderson' <LDAnderson@spokanecounty.org>; 'Maureen Ades (Co Utilities' <mades@spokanecounty.org>; 'PublicSafety'<PublicSafetyGlS@spokanecounty.org>; 'Tina Fisher (USPS' <tina.c.fisher@usos.gov>;'Veronica Soules (Avista' <veronica.soules@avistacorp.com>; 'Vicki Williams (Comcast' <vicki whitt-williams@cable.comcast.com>; 'Vickie Brown (CCC' <vrbrown@spokanefire.org>; Connor Lange <clange@sookanevalley.org> Cc: Taylor Dillard <tdillard@sookanevalley.org>; Greg Stauffer <gstauffer@spokanevallev.org> Subject: SEPA Request for Comments - File No. CTA -2019-0001 (City Initiated Code Text Amendment) All, Please review the attached SEPA checklist and proposed language adding Chapter 22.135 to the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) establishing the procedural standards to assign Addressing for property identification in the City. In addition addressing definitions will be added to SVMC Appendix A. Submit written comments via email or mail using the contact information below. The City of Spokane Valley is the lead SEPA agency for the environmental review of the above referenced City initiated Code Text Amendment. COMMENT PERIOD ENDS: March 19, 2019 Best regards, Karen Kendall 1 Planner 10210 E. Sprague Avenue 1 Spokane Valley, WA 99206 (509) 720-5026 1 kkendall@spokanevallev.org Spokane Walley This email and any attachments may be subject to disclosure pursuant to Washington State's Public Record Act, chapter 42.56 RCW. 3 Karen Kendall From: Frost -Andersen, Kirsten <KFROST@spokanecounty.org> Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2019 7:21 PM To: Karen Kendall Subject: RE: SEPA Request for Comments - File No. CTA -2019-0001 (City Initiated Code Text Amendment) Hi Karen, ran this by several of the Public Safety GIS staff here at the County and below are the comments I received in return: 1) They have not included the road naming section of the standards at all. They are just adopting the addressing standards. While the addressing standards are great and helpful and we certainly want to encourage adoption, it does nothing for the issues that arise from poor road naming, which are often more critical than the addressing, and at the very least are the base for the addressing. So no codification of disallowing duplicate road names, maintaining road names for their entire length, etc. I looked briefly at their existing municipal code thinking maybe they already had some road naming standards, but did not find anything. 2) Formatting issue... 22.135.050 Addressing Standards D. Each block along a street may have up to 100 address numbers. The hundred series shall change upon crossing a street intersection or in best possible alignment with the established address grid if applicable, with the exception of intersecting driveways and/or alleys. The hundred series along a public street shall not change upon crossing a private street unless deemed necessary by the City Manager for continuity of address sequencing. Private streets wholly contained within plats shall be assigned the hundred series as if they were public streets. This is the start of a new concept. It should be E. and all subsequent sections bumped up one letter. Except for loops and circles, two uniquely named streets may CTA -2019-0001 (Addressing Standards) March 5, 2019 Chapter 22.135 Draft v2 Page 3 I 6 not intersect more than once (e.g., Main Street should not intersect Cherry Lane at 201 East Main Street, and also intersect Cherry Lane at 401 East Main Street). Loops and circles shall be reviewed on an individual basis and require approval by the City Manager. E.F. Addresses along a street shall have even numbers on one side of the street and odd Thanks for letting us provide a review! We're exciting the City of Spokane Valley is adopting the regional standards! Kirsten Frost Andersen IT Supervisor Spokane County Information Technology Department kfrost@spokanecounty.org .., , 0.,,i1...Iti: s: i r•iii,.,,:t,:: � R`�qu ,t11,:41111 � 1i,..i1111� 174"m, Spokane County 1 From: Karen Kendall [mailto:kkendall@spokanevalley.org] Sent: Tuesday, March 5, 2019 4:49 PM To: 'Avista Dave Byus' <dave.byus@avistacorp.com>; 'Central Valley School District #356' <jrowell@cvsd.org>; 'CenturyLink' <Karen.Stoddard@centurylink.com>; Chad Riggs <criggs@spokanevalley.org>; Johnston, Christopher R. <CRJohnston@spokanesheriff.org>; Knudson, Chris <CKnudson@spokanecounty.org>; 'Christina Janssen (City of Millwood)' <planning@millwoodwa.us>; 'Cindy Anderson (cyan461@ecy.wa.gov)' <cyan461@ecy.wa.gov>; 'City of Liberty Lake ' <LKey@libertylakewa.gov>; Black, Tirrell <tblack@spokanecity.org>; Depner, Colin <CDEPNER@spokanecounty.org>; 'Comcast' <bryan_richardson@cable.comcast.com>;'Consolidated Irrigation District #19'<consolidatedirrigation@comcast.net>;'Deborah Johnson' <SEPA.reviewteam@doh.wa.gov>; 'Derek Lilleberg (Conoco Phillips)' <Derek.Lilleberg@p66.com>; 'East Spokane Water District #1' <distl@comcast.net>; 'East Valley School District #361' <smithLO@evsd.org>;'Felts Field - Ryan Sheehan' <rsheehan@spokaneairports.net>; 'Hutchinson Irrigation District' <hutchinsonid16@qwestoffice.net>; 'Inland Power & Light' <connien@inlandpower.com>; 'Irvin Water District' <irvinwater@windwireless.net>; 'Jacob McCann (Jmca461@ecy.wa.gov)' <Jmca461@ecy.wa.gov>; Jenny Nickerson <jnickerson@spokanevalley.org>; 'Larry Ostwald (Conoco Phillips)' <Larry.E.Ostwaid@p66.com>; 'Leslie King (Leslie.King@dfw.wa.gov)' <Leslie.King@dfw.wa.gov>; 'Marty Long' <mlong@scfd8.org>; Mike Stone <mstone@spokanevalley.org>; 'Modern Electric Water Co. ' <transmittals@mewco.com>; 'Modern Irrigation District' <info@modirr.org>; 'orchardaveirrigationdist6@comcast.net' <orchardaveirrigationdist6@comcast.net>; 'Patnode, Brian (PARKS)' <Brian.Patnode@PARKS.WA.GOV>; Ray Wright <rwright@spokanevalley.org>; 'Spokane Aquifer Joint Board' <info@spokaneaquifer.org>; Pederson, John <JPederson@spokanecounty.org>; 'Spokane County Water District #3' <scwd3@comcast.net>; 'Spokane Regional Clean Air Agency' <awestby@spokanecleanair.org>; 'Spokane Regional Health District' <psavage@srhd.org>; 'Spokane Regional Transportation Council' <rstewart@SRTC.org>; 'Spokane Transit Authority' <kotterstrom@spokanetransit.com>; 'Spokane Tribe of Indians' <randya@spokanetribe.com>; 'Spokane Valley Fire Disttict' <inspections@spokanevalleyfire.com>; 'Traci Harvey, Spokane Valley Fire Dept No. 1' <HarveyT@spokanevalleyfire.com>; 'Vera Water & Power' <kwells@verawaterandpower.com>; 'WA Commerce' <reviewteam@commerce.wa.gov>; 'WA Dept of Arch and Hist Preservation ' <Gretchen.Kaehler@DAHP.wa.gov>;'WA Ecology, Olympia' <sepaunit@ecy.wa.gov>; 'WA Fish & Wildlife' <SEPAdesk@dfw.wa.gov>; 'WA Natural Resources' <northeast.region@dnr.wa.gov>; 'WA Transportation' <FiggG@wsdot.wa.gov>; 'West Valley School District' <Timothy.Morgan@wvsd.org>; 'Araceli Tapuro' <araceli.e.tapuro@usps.gov>; 'Bob Hardin' <Bob.L.Hardin@usps.gov>; 'Chris Wafstet (Modern Electric' <cwafstet@mewco.com>; McMahon -Chase, Christine <CMCMAHONCHASE@spokanecounty.org>; 'David Robles' <david.g.robles@usps.gov>; Leifer, Jessica <JLeifer@SpokaneCounty.org>; Dosch, Ryan A. <RDOSCH@spokanecounty.org>; 'Edward Freeman' <edward.s.freeman@usps.gov>; Moulton, Frank <FMOULTON@spokanecounty.org>; 'Humphries, Guy B' <Guy.B.Humphries@usps.gov>; 'James Schiller' <James.C.Schiller@usps.gov>; Safarik, Jodi L. <JSAFARIK@spokanecounty.org>; 'Leonard Warren (Metro PO' <leonard.e.warren@usps.gov>; Anderson, Lindsey <LDAnderson@spokanecounty.org>; Ades, Maureen <MAdes@spokanecounty.org>; Public Safety GIS <PUBLICSAFETYGIS@spokanecounty.org>;'Tina Fisher (USPS' <tina.c.fisher@usps.gov>; 'Veronica Soules (Avista' <veronica.soules@avistacorp.com>; 'Vicki Williams (Comcast' <vicki_whitt-williams@cable.comcast.com>; 'Vickie Brown (CCC' <vrbrown@spokanefire.org>; Connor Lange <clange@spokanevalley.org> Cc: Taylor Dillard <tdillard@spokanevalley.org>; Greg Stauffer <gstauffer@spokanevalley.org> Subject: SEPA Request for Comments - File No. CTA -2019-0001 (City Initiated Code Text Amendment) All, Please review the attached SEPA checklist and proposed language adding Chapter 22.135 to the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) establishing the procedural standards to assign Addressing for property identification in the City. In addition addressing definitions will be added to SVMC Appendix A. Submit written comments via email or mail using the contact information below. The City of Spokane Valley is the lead SEPA agency for the environmental review of the above referenced City initiated Code Text Amendment. COMMENT PERIOD ENDS: March 19, 2019 2 From: Eliason, Joelie To: Karen Kendall Subject: RE: Proposed amendment to the SVMC Title 22 Date: Tuesday, March 26, 2019 11:52:51 AM Attachments: imaae002.pnq image003.pnq imaae004.pnq Thank you for the response, Karen (sorry I called you Kendall in my first email). I would like to describe my interest in this particular code change and I appreciate your time in reviewing my thoughts on the matter. I am a resident of Spokane Valley, so I have a vested interest in SVMC changes. I work for the City of Spokane (COS) and addressing is one of my duties. The COS also, historically, limited the numbering to below 50 for the last two digits of the address. This numbering scheme has created addressing issues as the COS continues to change and grow or as zoning changes. Some the issues are a result of re -platting or segregation to create smaller parcels within an existing platted area. There are times when a zoning or land use change from single family to two-family or more has caused an address crunch as duplexes are replacing dilapidated homes. I was encouraged by Public Safety GIS and Spokane County E911 to utilize the whole numbering system (01-99 — we try to reserve 00 for intersections) to better indicate the location of an emergency call; i.e. address numbers in the 01-50 range (west half of the block) will be closer to the west intersection and numbers in the 51-99 range (east half of the block) will be closer to the east intersection. This may allow for a reduction in emergency response time when seconds may count as some of the systems dispatch to the nearest intersection. Thank you again, Karen, for considering my thoughts on the matter. I am glad to see that a thorough addressing code is proposed and will provide guidance as Spokane Valley continues to grow. Best of luck! Sincerely, Joelie Eliason Joelie Eliason City of Spokane Engineering Technician IV Development Services Center 509.625-6385 fax 509.625.6822 jeliasonna spokanecity.ora spokanecity.ora Know wuhatss below. Gall before you dig. From: Karen Kendall <kkendall@spokanevalley.org> Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2019 9:17 AM To: Eliason, Joelie <jeliason@spokanecity.org> Subject: RE: Proposed amendment to the SVMC Title 22 Thank you for the question, Joelie. Historically the Valley has been addressed consistent with our proposed standards. The numbering provides consistency and predictability. There are rare cases we may increase the numbering as it is deemed fit. Hope this helps. Best regards, Karen Kendall 1 Planner (509) 720-5026 1 kkendall@saokanevallev.orc This email and any attachments may be subject to disclosure pursuant to Washington State's Public Record Act, chapter 42.56 RCW. From: Eliason, Joelie[mailto:jeliason@sookanecitv.org] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2019 3:40 PM To: Karen Kendall <kkendall@sookanevallev.org> Subject: Proposed amendment to the SVMC Title 22 Good afternoon Kendall, I was reviewing the proposed amendment to SVMC Title 22 regarding addressing in Spokane Valley. I am curious about why the last two digits of street number shall not exceed 33 (22.135.050.L.3). Is there a particular reason to limit the addresses from 1-33? Thank you, Joelie Eliason Joelie Eliason 1 City of Spokane 1 Engineering Technician IV Development Services Center 509.625-6385 1 fax 509.625.6822 jeliasonPspokanecity.or• 1 spokanecity.org F.A �5 i15 f LACE US Know wuhatss below Gall before you dig. From: Eliason, Joelie To: Karen Kendall Subject: RE: Proposed amendment to the SVMC Title 22 Date: Tuesday, March 26, 2019 11:52:51 AM Attachments: imaae002.pnq image003.pnq imaae004.pnq Thank you for the response, Karen (sorry I called you Kendall in my first email). I would like to describe my interest in this particular code change and I appreciate your time in reviewing my thoughts on the matter. I am a resident of Spokane Valley, so I have a vested interest in SVMC changes. I work for the City of Spokane (COS) and addressing is one of my duties. The COS also, historically, limited the numbering to below 50 for the last two digits of the address. This numbering scheme has created addressing issues as the COS continues to change and grow or as zoning changes. Some the issues are a result of re -platting or segregation to create smaller parcels within an existing platted area. There are times when a zoning or land use change from single family to two-family or more has caused an address crunch as duplexes are replacing dilapidated homes. I was encouraged by Public Safety GIS and Spokane County E911 to utilize the whole numbering system (01-99 — we try to reserve 00 for intersections) to better indicate the location of an emergency call; i.e. address numbers in the 01-50 range (west half of the block) will be closer to the west intersection and numbers in the 51-99 range (east half of the block) will be closer to the east intersection. This may allow for a reduction in emergency response time when seconds may count as some of the systems dispatch to the nearest intersection. Thank you again, Karen, for considering my thoughts on the matter. I am glad to see that a thorough addressing code is proposed and will provide guidance as Spokane Valley continues to grow. Best of luck! Sincerely, Joelie Eliason Joelie Eliason City of Spokane Engineering Technician IV Development Services Center 509.625-6385 fax 509.625.6822 jeliasonna spokanecity.ora spokanecity.ora Know wuhatss below. Gall before you dig. From: Karen Kendall <kkendall@spokanevalley.org> Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2019 9:17 AM To: Eliason, Joelie <jeliason@spokanecity.org> Subject: RE: Proposed amendment to the SVMC Title 22 Thank you for the question, Joelie. Historically the Valley has been addressed consistent with our proposed standards. The numbering provides consistency and predictability. There are rare cases we may increase the numbering as it is deemed fit. Hope this helps. Best regards, Karen Kendall 1 Planner (509) 720-5026 1 kkendall@saokanevallev.orc This email and any attachments may be subject to disclosure pursuant to Washington State's Public Record Act, chapter 42.56 RCW. From: Eliason, Joelie[mailto:jeliason@sookanecitv.org] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2019 3:40 PM To: Karen Kendall <kkendall@sookanevallev.org> Subject: Proposed amendment to the SVMC Title 22 Good afternoon Kendall, I was reviewing the proposed amendment to SVMC Title 22 regarding addressing in Spokane Valley. I am curious about why the last two digits of street number shall not exceed 33 (22.135.050.L.3). Is there a particular reason to limit the addresses from 1-33? Thank you, Joelie Eliason Joelie Eliason 1 City of Spokane 1 Engineering Technician IV Development Services Center 509.625-6385 1 fax 509.625.6822 jeliasonPspokanecity.or• 1 spokanecity.org F.A �5 i15 f LACE US Know wuhatss below Gall before you dig. CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: June 4, 2019 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ® new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Motion Consideration — Potential Grant Opportunity: Better Utilizing Investments to Leverage Development (BUILD) Fiscal Year (FY) 2019 GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 35.77.010: Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: • May 22, 2018: City Council authorized the City Manager to apply for Federal Railroad Administration's (FRA) Consolidated Rail Infrastructure and Safety Improvements Program (CRISI) FY 2017 grant funds for the Pines Road/BNSF Grade Separation Project (GSP) • June 5, 2018: City Council authorized the City Manager to apply for BUILD (FY 18) grant funds for the Pines Road/BNSF GSP • August 21, 2018: City Council authorized the City Manager to apply for FRA's CRISI FY 2018 grant funds for the Pines Road/BNSF GSP • May 21, 2019: Administrative report discussing the potential grant opportunity offered by USDOT's BUILD discretionary grant program. BACKGROUND: The US Department of Transportation (USDOT) issued a call for projects on April 17, 2019 for the BUILD discretionary grant program. BUILD was authorized as part of the Consolidated Appropriations Act in 2019 and offers a total of $900 million available for transportation infrastructure improvement projects like the City's Pines Road/BNSF Grade Separation Project. Projects are evaluated on safety, state of good repair, economic competitiveness, environmental sustainability, quality of life, innovation, and partnership. Minimum and maximum award amounts for urban projects are $5 million and $25 million, respectively. No state is permitted to receive over $90 million of awarded funds. Total awarded funds will be split equally between urban and rural areas. BUILD requires a 20% non-federal match for awarded projects within an urban boundary. BUILD applications are due July 15, 2019. Award announcements are on or before November 12, 2019. If awarded, BUILD funding must be obligated by September 30, 2021. This obligation requires the City to have a signed and executed grant agreement in place with USDOT by the September 30, 2021 deadline. If awarded, BUILD funding must be fully expended (i.e. expended, invoiced, or reimbursed) by September 30, 2026. Staff recommends applying for the City's Pines Road/BNSF Grade Separation Project. Assuming a $29 million total cost, a minimum 20% non -Federal match of $5.8 million would be required. Through May 2019, the City expended approximately $700,000 of the $3,200,000 set aside for this project, leaving a balance of approximately $2,500,000. The remaining $3,300,000 of non-federal matching dollars needed to comply with BUILD requirements could come from City funds, State Legislative appropriations, Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board (FMSIB), or Transportation Improvement Board (TIB) grants. OPTIONS: 1) Approve the recommended project for this grant program, 2) take other action. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to authorize the City Manager or designee, to apply for the BUILD FY 19 program for the Pines Road/BNSF Grade Separation Project. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: The 20% non-federal match for a $29 million total project cost is $5,800,000. The project will be responsible for securing this amount of non-federal funds. It is anticipated that the total project cost for the selected alternative will be less than $29 million. STAFF CONTACT: Adam Jackson, PE — Planning & Grants Engineer ATTACHMENTS: BUILD FY 2019 PowerPoint Presentation Potential Grant Opportunity Better Utilizing Investments to Leverage Development (BUILD) SpokaneValleye Pines/BNSF Grade Separation Project June 4, 2019 Adam Jackson, P.E., Planning & Grants Engineer Engineering Division What is BUILD? US Department of Transportation (USDOT) BUILD Program Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2019 BUILD funding can support roads, bridges, transit, rail, ports or intermodal transportation. Projects evaluated on safety, state of good repair, economic competitiveness, environmental sustainability, quality of life, innovation, and partnership. 2019 BUILD Funding • Total program funds $900 million — Awards split 50/50 to urban/rural areas • Min Urban Award $5 Million Max Award $25 Million (80% of Project Cost) $90 Million July 15, 2019 November 12, 2019 September 30, 2021 September 30, 2026 State Award Limit = Applications Due = Award Notice • Funds Obligated • Funds Expended ser Local Agency Federal Ald Project Prospectus 1.11F V,3111,141-01, Fa HOFF MOBILITY S rant dGlc INVESTLENJ ROARED Deceml., 11,10, Ida MI Rnginear City Qr,Rolatan,alle, 11707 Rav Sui. 105 Spokane Va., 11,5hinglan 992.05,24 Elmrher 121.1.135.tiF Glade Scpexattryn 141, 2,24 :National Highway Freight rragrrin Federal Funding Aarenl Duff 1,1, noT alt.,. advi,vau that May men don, pro, W32 rceeive ffind, duRogh theRlatar,111-411,, re,hr Plovarn .(1.1116) 2P20 11.Rdcral !and Mt Wow Maker Road/MYST' Separidan RRII00,11110 Saape, itepkuR, an at gmclo with mnoverrav, of .121.5F's ned lics into SR 2,40 ta the RT.,. an at grad° ratRicx,tion ko,2 Fam.Isaare cr,aeRibie, for co. from Om. oaks to mod sta., ruler, requia¢aign,s,11,1,,,,,,,,,,,, • Projeu aNymditurrs ,naurn4 Ixfore NOCiViE,11,11CL RragaRR frdorni fun.tr ant...azdan arr: ...Hail. fox Etirnburserric, l'Icasc raft, u the I nexl Rrogrons we!, nagc for cictaila in far:nano, (MOM,' w•clet ladlihe, (LW a., mi. Cr lac ,oritatt, regaR., Pralcau 1,1u, I 1, ca oal, 1,, nrrarl TERworktlaultap-avame, ta,au. pro,alancd unt, Lanc11,1, Rnas: 111. Srf.1.11. urAl DR:salb,a yaal: I a Na,eR, L1,13taba, Spoknc1,11,,,, -.-RutpiRmard 4,2,9 hr ,48gword is ,ca,tive Rs a rcalindel, Lac, Ravm, raotua, agcnci. bnAmorchl, 1115, , ras,u, r,unbulaerrmt vRgIbla 3 Pines/BNSF Grade Separation Project Estimated Total Project Cost: 80% Max. Federal Award Amount - Secured Federal Funds (STBG) Maximum BUILD Request 20% Non -Federal Funds Required - Available City Funds Min. Non -Federal Funding Gap $ 29,000,000 23,200,000 1,890,000 $ 21,310,000 $ 5,800,000 2,500,000 $ 3,300,000* *Non-federal examples: City allocations, Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board (FMSIB), State Legislative appropriations, or Transportation Improvement Board (TIB) ■ Parallel Federal Funding Requests: CRISI Funding Request (PE): $ 1,246,500 City Match to PE: 1,246,500 Subtotal $ 2,493,000 4 QUESTIONS? U.S.Deportment ofTrunsportrativn ell oi Federal Railroad Administrafion CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: June 4, 2019 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ® admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Pines Grade Separation Project Design Alternatives GOVERNING LEGISLATION: None PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: • Administrative report, Bridging the Valley, May 7, 2013 • Resolution No. 17-011 adopting the 2016-2021 Six Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP), which included both the Barker Road and the Pines Road Grade Separation Projects (GSP) — June 23, 2015 • Adopted the 2016-2021 Six Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP), which included the Pines Road Grade Separation Project (GSP) — • Motion to acquire Pinecroft property - January 10, 2017 • Council passed Resolution 17-006, amending the 2017 TIP, February 28, 2017. • Administrative report seeking Council consensus to move forward with project design - March 28, 2017 • Resolution No. 17-011 adopting the 2018-2023 Six -Year TIP, which included the Grade Road GSP - May 23, 2017 • Motion passed to select a Consultant for Pines/BNSF Grade Separation Project, Phase 1 Design Contract - July 11, 2017. • Admin Report on Design Alternatives — October 17, 2017. • Motion consideration to apply for Spokane Regional Transportation Council's (SRTC) federal grants, March 27, 2018. • Motion consideration to apply for Consolidated Rail Infrastructure and Safety Improvements Program, FY2017, (CRISI #1) grant, May 22, 2018. • Motion consideration to apply for Better Utilizing Investments to Leverage Development (BUILD) grant, June 5, 2018. • Motion consideration to apply for Consolidated Rail Infrastructure and Safety Improvements Program, FY2018, (CRISI #2) grant, August 21, 2018. • Admin Report on Design Alternatives — December 4, 2018 BACKGROUND: Staff issued a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) for engineering design services for the Pines Road GSP in 2016. HDR Engineering and DEA (Consultants) were selected to design the project in May 2017. On July 11, 2017, the City Council authorized the City Manager to award an engineering services contract to the Consultants. The design will be completed in two phases. In the first phase, the Consultant will analyze and compare two alternatives in terms of cost, right-of-way needs, impacts to existing properties, constructability, safety, and other pertinent project elements so the City can select the preferred alternative. In the second phase, the Consultant will complete the preliminary engineering design of the selected alternative. The Consultant is evaluating two alternatives as part of the Phase I design. Staff provided an overview of the alternatives to Council on October 24, 2017 and on December 4, 2018. Staff discussed the two alternatives at a public meeting on October 4, 2017 and at two public meetings on April 18, 2019. In addition, the Greater Spokane Valley Chamber of Commerce facilitated a project discussion with their members on December 13, 2018 and with their transportation committee on May 23, 2019 where staff presented the two alternatives and two intersection control types. Staff also met individually with representatives from the Spokane Valley Police Department, Spokane Valley Fire Department, East Valley School District, and in April 2019, met with Matt Ewers of IEDS Logistics who represents the freight industry. These stakeholders indicated that they support Alternative 2 with a roundabout because it has flatter grades than Alternative 1. East Valley School District also prefers Alternative 2 because it moves the intersection away from the school. In addition, staff had additional discussions with BNSF on May 15, 2019 to ensure they did not have any objections with either alternative. Furthermore, staff met with Senator Mike Padden and Representatives Matt Shea and Bob McCaslin in May 2019 to discuss the project and the upcoming staff recommendation to Council. The state legislators did not voice any concerns with staff recommendation of Alternative 2 with a roundabout. OPTIONS: Staff is recommending to advance Alternative 2 with a roundabout to design. Council can concur with staff or select another option. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Council consensus for staff to bring forward a motion consideration on June 18, 2019, to advance Alternative 2 with a roundabout design. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Varies as presented in the attached presentation. STAFF CONTACT: Gloria Mantz, PE — Engineering Manager Erica Amsden, PE — Senior Project Engineer ATTACHMENTS: Presentation Project Location June 4, 2019 Pines Road (SR 27) and Trent Avenue (SR 290) Intersection Main Freight Corridor Part of National Highway System (NHS) Route No. 1 Unfunded At Grade Crossing in WA State High Average Daily Traffic (ADT) Spokane Valley Existing Conditions June 4, 2019 Project Detai Existing Trains per Day 60 Vehicle ADT at Crossing 16,750 Intersection Current Level of Service D Daily Train Whistles 120 Total Vehicle Collisions (2014-2018) 53 Injury Collisions (2014-2018) 19 Property Damage Collisions (2014-2018) 34 3 Spokane _Valley Project Purpose June 4, 2019 Eliminate At -Grade Railroad Crossing with Underpass Improve Safety Improve Level of Service Improve Emergency Access Reduce Train Noise Add Non -Motorized Facilities Spokane .Valley Project Funding June 4, 2019 Current Funding City Funds STBG Grant Secured Funding Inactive Grants FMSIB Grant from 2000 (WSDOT Application) Funding Gap Highest Project Cost (Assume Alternative 1) Secured Funding Inactive Grants Funding Gap $ 3.2M $ 1.9M $ 5.1M $ 3.3M $ 29.0M $ 5.1M $ 3.3M $2O.6M Spokane .Valley Steps to Acquire Funding June 4, 2019 Pursue All Funding Opportunities Available Competitive and Limited Funding Most Successful Projects are Construction Ready (Design Complete). To Make the Project More Attractive to Funding Advance the Project to Design 6 Spokane .Valley Alternatives Evaluation —Phase 1 Design June 4, 2019 Roadway Alignment Evaluate Potential Roadway Alignments Accommodate 4 Tracks per BNSF Identify & Compare Scenarios Impacts of Vehicle & Pedestrian Safety Right -of -Way Needs Traffic Modeling Total Project Costs Constructability Construction Time Frame Intersection Control Evaluation Signal vs Roundabout 7 Spokane .Valley Alternative Evaluation June 4, 2019 v 1. :. -fes, +11s ' n. ij 44I Gh I= ILII I y51.9 EAU PKW 4•tc T/�• '� S'F . 5 '• yF ..�� t 5k ,ry A I 1��l i +10 - N. l`./ I f ll. - _.wI '_ -'—*.--- rir i •' ``�� aid •�a5' et -i_�� t. II EN, `l l .._ 1._ 1ENTAXY :HOOT - ! k1� • V . _'1^'''''a1 1, a\ a1 4. ' % ,_ .\ ' t a 1• i Cr ----' N. CNEkRY V, it �•' ,eF / t — "'-' } l _ems- Y- r�� �• 41rix V aria f' ¢- �a - .!Ex 11P%Yi _ i k Alternative 1 8 Alternative 2 Spokane .Valley Alternative 1 June 4, 2019 Pro More Traditional Alignment Cons Higher Probable Cost — $29M (Assumes 2023 CN) Lowers Trent 10 to 12 feet Steeper Road Grades Near Intersection 9 Alternative 1 —Pines Profile June 4, 2019 EXISTING GROUND EXISTING ANSF TRACK PROPOSED BNS TRACK 5.5' BRIDGE - THICKNESS ASSUMED \. MATCH TO EXISTING N. PINES RD. 10 MATCH TO EXISTING PORTLAND AVE. TRENT INTERSECTION FINISHED GRADE Alternative 1 —Trent Profile June 4, 2019 Lowers Trent 10-12 feet (N1500 feet of roadway) Requires Retaining Walls Along Trent -0.20% 11 0 RETAINING WALL / LEFT 1.50% RETAINING WALL GROUNG LEFT � GROUND 3.3 MATCH PROPOSED PINES RD Trent / Pines Intersection ,G~�...... -1.94% Alternative 1 June 4, 2019 Cons (Continued) Eliminates Access to Trent for Several Parcels Impacts More Private Property Owners 13 Property Acquisitions 4-6 Relocations Greater Impact to Traffic During Construction Construction of Trent 2 years of construction Lower Score in WSDOT Cost Benefit Analysis 12 Alternative 1 June 4, 2019 Construction of Trent Three Phases Reduce to two lanes Excavate/Build south side (1yr) Shift traffic to completed side Excavate/Build north side (1yr) Open all lanes Similar Construction for Pines 13 a -11 a r WORKZONE WORKZON E Alternative 1 June 4, 2019 Wall types (Geotextile, Pile w/ wood, Steel sheet pile) Alternative 2 June 4, 2019 Pros Lower Probable Cost — $26M (Assumes 2023 CN) Connects to Trent Avenue At -Grade Does not Require Walls on Trent Flatter Road Grades Near Intersection Higher Score in WSDOT Cost Benefit Analysis 15 Alternative 2 —Pines Profile June 4, 2019 Connects to Trent at Existing Ground Near Spokane River Bridge No Lowering of Trent Required EXISTING @NSF TRACK ROPOSED SNSF RACK 5.5' RRIDQE THICKNESS ASSUMED MATCH TO E]USTING N. PINES RD. 16 163' X18' Trent / Pines Intersection EXIS NG GROUND 1.20% FINFSHFD GRADE -0.50% 0.40% CLI.ARANCE 11-1;0,S` ;11-1;0,8I,.L:A .L DUE TO SuPFP.EI_., ON GURYF UNDER 8Ri:GE STRLI.':IINNI CENTER OF ROUNDABOUT MATCH TO EXISTING PORTLAND AVE. Alternative 2 June 4, 2019 Pros (Continued) Less Impact to Traffic During Construction Majority Can Be Constructed Without Impacts Impacts Less Private Property Owners 11 Acquisitions 3 Relocations 17 Mini BEAU PIKWY Alternative 2 June 4, 2019 Cons Unusual Alignment, However; Reduced Speed Near Intersection Accommodates Truck Movement Requires More ROW Acquisition from BNSF 18 Alternative 2 —Examples June 4, 2019 MRL Bridge over 13th Street, Billings MT Alternative 2 Examples June 4, 2019 BNSF Bridge over Passons Boulevard, Pico Rivera, CA 20 Intersection Analysis June 4, 2019 Signal Versus Roundabout Safety for Vehicles, Intersection and Pedestrians Dependability Level of Service Spokane .Valley June 4, 2019 Vehicle Safety Traffic Signal — 32 Conflict Points 22 • Diverging • Merging 0 Crossing 2 -Lane Roundabout — 14 Conflict Points Spokane .Valley Intersection Safety June 4, 2019 Roundabout Safety Performance Compared to Signal 7596 reduction (h eniTi is,fli.i,ai•, Ji1�ui3 4.11111*I��il. reductic>n7 1 s .. I I:, i in. NdoriJAIL Source: NCHRP Report 672 Exhibit 5-2 Hit by a vehicle traveling at Hit by a vehicle traveling at 20 MPH 30 MPH 140 Hit by a vehicle traveling at MPH 9 out of 10 pedestrians survive. O O O O • • • 5 out of 10 pedestrians survive. only 1 out of 10 pedestrians survives. SO lane .Valley Dependability June 4, 2019 24 Intersection Control Areas of Failure Example • Power Outages • Failed Electrical Components' ' • P Ie/Detecti n/Con r II r/Wiring gan' . _i_ Damage • Failed Bulbs • ,,, • Intersection Illumination Damage • • Hardscape Damage Beacon Pole Damage A , =� • Intersection Illumination Damage :` iokane .Valley Measure of delay or wait time at the intersection. Level of Service Intersection Level of Service (LOS) June 4, 2019 25 Description Signalized Intersection Delay (seconds} A Free-flowing condition's. 0-10 Stable operating conditirons. 10-20 Stable operating conditions, but individual motorists 20-5 are affected by the interactiQn with cher motorists. IJ High density of motorists, but stable flow_ E Near -capacity operations, with speeds reduced to a low but uniform speed_ F Over -capacity Conditions with long deliays. 0-10 10-15 15-25 35-55 25-35 55-80 35-50 } 8O Source: Highway Capacitor Manual 2016,. Transportation Research Board Spokane Valley Level of Service (LOS) at Pines/Trent June 4, 2019 26 TABLE 8. 2020 NO BUILD AND ALTERNATIVES PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION OPERATIONS Pines Rd / Trent Ave AM Peak Hour Delay / LOS PM Peak Hour Delay / LOS Alternative 1 Alternative 1 a Alternative 2 Alternative 2a Signal Roundabout Signal Roundabout 27/C 8/A 24/C 7/A 42 / D 9/A 32/C 7/A Source: Fehr & Peers, 2018 Spokane .Valley Level of Service (LOS) at Pines/Trent June 4, 2019 27 TABLE 9. 2040 NO BUILD AND ALTERNATIVES PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION OPERATIONS AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Pines Rd / Trent Ave Alternative 1 Alternative la Alternative 2 Alternative 2a Source: Fehr & Peers, 2018 Control Signal Roundabout Signal Roundabout Delay / LOS 28/C 9/A 26/C Delay / LOS 41 / D 9/A 32/C 8/A 8/A Spokane Valley 28 Roundabout Truck Accommodation June 4, 2019 Design Vehicle: WB -67 53' trailer 15' cab 67' from trailer to front truck axle 1615m _i 157m [530fi1 -I 1 [15D11 13.&7 m 145.5 ft] 20.42 m 1 35 m 14.4 e] 2240m 173.5 @] 594m 119.5 11] Spokane Valley City Council Presentations June 4, 2019 29 January 10, 2017 — Motion consideration for Pines GSP Early Property Acquisition March 28, 2017 — Administrative Report Seeking Council Consensus to Move Forward with Project Design July 11, 2017 — Motion Consideration Selecting HDR as the Consultant October 17, 2017 — Administrative Report on Design Alternatives December 13, 2018 — Administrative Report with Project Update Spokane .Valley Public Outreach June 4, 2019 October 4, 2017 Public Meeting December 13, 2018 Chamber of Commerce Transportation Meeting April 18, 2019 Morning Public Meeting April 18, 2019 Evening Public Meeting May 23, 2019 - Chamber of Commerce Transportation Committee Spokane .Valley Recent Stakeholder Outreach June 4, 2019 April 29-30, 2019 Spokane Valley Police Department Freight Industry Representative Spokane Valley Fire Department East Valley School District All Preferred Alterative 2 with a Roundabout May 15, 2019 BNSF Meeting to Discus Alignment Options BNSF Does not Object to Alternative 2 31 Spokane .Valley Recent Stakeholder Outreach June 4, 2019 Meetings with State Legislators — May 20 and 22 Senator Mike Padden State Representative Bob McCaslin State Representative Matt Shea 32 Spokane .Valley Staff Recommendation June 4, 2019 Based on the Phase I Alternative Analysis: Advance Alternative 2 with a Roundabout to Design Asking for Council Consensus Motion Consideration June 18, 2019 33 Spokane .Valley Next Steps June 4, 2019 Negotiate Scope of Work for Phase II Design with Consultant WSDOT Approval Begin Final Design of Selected Alternative Continue to Pursue Funding to Breach Potential Gap of $20.6M ROW Acquisition— Anticipated 2020/2021 Construction Schedule Unknown Until All Funding is Secured S""okane p .Valley Questions June 4, 2019 Jy }� L-Isi4 �4 is.�� ..T ' 4Gh I I, EAU PKWY — - .—_--T-. pyo '� 'F Sfi, yF t -� V ../.• ii A I 11111 `l iq . - N. 4 l`./ I ll I /)f 64y51w9 «.— 4 • �`�� aid •� � Re6. II EN, `l l .._ 1._ 1ENTAXY :HOOT - ! k1� • V . _'1^'''''a1 1, a\ a1 4. ' % ,_ .\ ' t a 1• i Cr ----' N. CNEkRY V, it r 5 '� .gP �/ tom' f •' k Y- :1.iY r�� . • 41rix V f ' ¢ - II I eEX — 1 L ,. .J.�Ta..J 1ha4 35 Spokane .Valley CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: June 4, 2019 Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ information ® admin. report Department Director Approval: ® new business ❑ public hearing ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Appleway Trail (Evergreen Rd to Sullivan Rd) GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 35.77.010, Perpetual Advanced Six -Year plans for coordinated transportation program expenditures. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: • 6/28/2016: Council passed Resolution 16-009, adopting the 2017-2022 Six Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP), which included this project. • 5/23/2017: Council passed Resolution 17-011, adopting the 2018-2023 Six Year TIP, which included this project. • 2/23/2018: Council Workshop discussion regarding Appleway Trail. • 2/27/2018: Council passed a motion to repackage two segments of the Appleway Trail to fully fund the trail segment from Evergreen to Sullivan BACKGROUND: When fully constructed, the Appleway Trail will provide a five mile urban trail that will extend from the eastern City boundaries to City Hall. The segments from the City boundaries to Sullivan, University to Pines, and Pines and Evergreen have been completed. Construction for the segment from Evergreen to Sullivan will begin in August 2019. The project scope includes a 12 -foot wide multi -use asphalt path and trail amenities such as irrigation, plantings, lightings, crossings, and traffic crossing devices. Because other agencies were not able to obligate federal funds this fiscal year, the funding for this project became available in 2019, rather than in 2020 when it was programmed. The project budget is: City Match (311) TAP Grant CMAQ Grant Total budget OPTIONS: Discussion $ 323,325 $ 198,950 $ 1,872,725 $ 2,395,000 RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Discussion BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: The estimated project cost is $2,395,000. There are sufficient funds to cover the cost for this project. STAFF CONTACT: Gloria Mantz, PE, Engineering Manager Robert Lochmiller, Project Manager Mike Stone, Parks & Recreation Director ATTACHMENTS: Power Point Presentation Trail (Evergren tQ Su Spokane Valle Mantz, PE, Engineering Manager Rob Lochmiller, PE, Project Manager Mike Stone, Parks & Recreation Director Jeremy Clark, DEA Presentation Agenda June 4, 2019 Project Timeline & Location Trail Amenities Crossing Treatments Estimated Budget & Funding Tentative Schedule Spokane .000 Valley Project Timeline & Location June 4, 2019 University to Pines —Completed 2015 Pines to Evergreen —Completed 2017 Sullivan to Corbin — Completed 2018 Corbin to City Limits — Completed 2008 Evergreen to Sullivan Design 2019 Construction 2019/2020 Trail Components June 4, 2019 12 foot Asphalt Tra i I Pedestrian Crossings 5 Trail Landscaping June 4, 2019 Landscape Treatments at Each Street Crossing Evergreen, Adams, Progress & Sullivan Roads Scottish Link Grass & Trees Irrigation Spokane _ Valley Trailhead Parking (Alternate) June 4, 2019 PIN �.y iN sln n{n' AM - -CFE- - -L - J _ul a�L 2nd Avenue kyk f 1 - X 6 Spokane �s Valley Restroom (Alternate) June 4, 2019 Outside Finish Interior Lighting Hand Dryer Automatic Locks Supplemental Lighting Spokane _ Valley Crossing Treatment Evaluation June 4, 2019 Speed 35 mph Width of Crossing 5 Lanes Without a Raised Median Vehicle Volume >15,000 ADT Pedestrian Volumes 25/hr Existing 80/hr — 20 year Estimate Spokane .000 Valley Crossing Treatment Evaluation June 4, 2019 Crossing Type Recommendation Sullivan Road Single Stage Full Crossing Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon such as HAWK Two Stage Half Crossing Evergreen Road Single Stage Full Crossing Two Stage Half Crossing 9 Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon such as HAWK Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon Spokane ii Valley HAWK Signal at SR -27 June 4, 2019 10 SR -27 Has Higher Volumes than Evergreen Rd and Sullivan Rd Coordinated the Crossing Phase with Signal at SR-27/Sprague Hold Pedestrians at the Crossing Until Signal Stopped Northbound and Southbound Traffic Pedestrians and Motorists Did not Comply Motorists Stopped Before Red Indications Trail Users Crossed Before the Red Indications — Did Not Wait for the Coordinated Cycle Motorists Arrived at Red Indications with No Trail Users Present & Passed the Red Indication Without Stopping S[ okne P �� Valley Traffic Crossing Devices June 4, 2019 Two Stage Crossings Pedestrian Refuge Islands Rectangular Rapid Flash Beacon Systems Advanced Warning Signs for Crossings Estimated Cost and Budget June 4, 2019 Estimated Project Costs Preliminary Engineering Construction Total Estimated Costs Current Project Budget CMAQ Grant TAP Grant City Fund 312 Total Current Budget $ 100,000 $ 2,295,000 $ 2,395,000 $ 1,872,725 $ 198,950 $ 323,325 $ 2,395,000 Spokane .000 Valley Tentative Schedule June 4, 2019 June 28th July 19th July 23rd Mid August Spring 2020 Bid Advertisement Bid Opening Council Bid Award Construction Start Project Completion Spokane .000 Valley Questions June 4, 2019 14 Spokane .000 Valley CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: June 4, 2019 Department Director Approval: ❑ Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ® admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Point in Time Count 2019 GOVERNING LEGISLATION: PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: BACKGROUND: Council previously asked for a presentation concerning the "Point in Time Count 2019," and Ms. Tija Danzig of the City of Spokane will be on hand to explain the "Everybody Counts Campaign" which is a point -in -time census of the homeless population in Spokane. According to the information on-line, this census is conducted every year during the last ten days in January and is designed to give every federally -funded community a snapshot of homelessness where they live, and has been deemed a critical element in efforts to end homelessness. In order to give a better understanding of the process, Ms. Danzig has supplied a full version of the presentation. However, in the interest of time, she will be giving Council an abbreviated version. OPTIONS: Information/discussion RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Information/discussion BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: STAFF CONTACT: ATTACHMENTS: Full Version of the "Everybody Counts Point -in -Time Count" presentation. One Vision. One Plan. One Voice. One Spokane. Safer. Smarter. Healthier. The 2019 Everybody Counts Point -in -Time Count effort is one way that the City of Spokane strives to utilize data and knowledge for action, in order to improve the lives of our most vulnerable citizens throughout the region. SPOKANE HELLO! This presentation is designed to share data collected during the 2019 Everybody Counts campaign's Point -in -Time Count. This data provides a snapshot that captures the circumstances and situations of people experiencing homelessness in our region. DATA ) KNOWLEDGE ) ACTION 2 One Vision. One Plan. One Voice. One Spokane. Safer. Smarter. Healthier. TODAY'S DISCUSSION verybody Counts O The Methodology O The Data O The Knowledge O The Action 3 One Vision. One Plan. One Voice. One Spokane. Safer. Smarter. Healthier. THE COUNT Everybody Counts The count date was January 24th This date aligns with the rest of the state The count of unsheltered homeless lasted for seven days from January 24th, however the surveys reflected where people stayed on the night of the count The count is focused on two main categories for persons experiencing homelessness: Sheltered during the night of the count (emergency shelter, transitional housing) Unsheltered, or out-of-doors during the night of the count 4 One Vision. One Plan. One Voice. One Spokane. Safer. Smarter. Healthier. THE METHODOLOGY (WhatStayedThe Same) o`�,oteer Suppo� Community Involvement Last year, we trained nearly 100 volunteers and had participation from three-quarters of them on campaign activities, including the count and donation drive efforts. This year, we held nine trainings for 142 people. More than two-thirds of those trained helped with counting events, while others became engaged in other ways. r111111 For the second year, we utilized an app developed by Simtech Solutions. The app was updated and improved based on feedback provided from last year. Data collected is combined with HMIS data to give us a fuller landscape. $Carded Out,- C4 1 We coordinated with 79 service agencies and all outreach teams, worked with County rural outreach centers, and expanded our known location list. This year, we counted in 211 locations (38 more places than 2018). cused 0 s)0,0tion Drat Targeted Efforts Engaged Citizens This year, we held four youth -focused events to meet youth and young adults in places they already go and incentivize their participation. These events were designed and led by youth service providers and young people. From mid-November to January, the City held a donation drive for winter clothing and essential needs items to distribute to people experiencing homelessness during the Count. In total, 4,021 items were donated by community members and 1,956 items were purchased by the City to create "Care Baggy'. Ion One Vision. One Plan. One Voice. One Spokane. Safer. Smarter. Healthier. e.‘ ns Abet/. Questions were added this year to learn more about reasons for homelessness and to better align with questions being asked in the HMIS work flow. *\,\°nal Loo./( s We added additional counting locations for critical services serving people experiencing homelessness, such as The Needle Exchange, meal sites, and clothing banks. �e�r,FocuseaF�2-1 Targeted Outreach For the first time, we held a Magnet Event to ensure effective counting veterans. This event partnered with veteran service agencies, offering targeted resources and services, as well as provided a hot meal to incentivize participation. e\ess Cosh oce While we overlapped with the Homeless Connect last year, this year we finished the Count with the Connect (rather than starting with it). This allowed us to better count people living in certain unsheltered locations, such as vehicles, etc. 6 THE DATA Understanding the landscape of homelessness throughout Spokane County. One Vision. One Plan. One Voice. One Spokane. Safer. Smarter. Healthier. 1,309 people which make up 1,070 households 8 GENERAL INFORMATION ALL PEOPLE One Vision. One Plan. One Voice. One Spokane. Safer. Smarter. Healthier. People in HH with Children Only, 22, 2% People in HH with Adults and Children (Families), 302, 23% People in HH with Adults Only, 985, 75% 3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 Average Household Size 3.1 Households with Households with Households with Adults and Children Adults Only Children Only 10 One Vision. One Plan. One Voice. One Spokane. Safer. Smarter. Healthier. Unsheltered, 19, 6% Emergency Shelter, 154, 51% People in Households with Adults and Children (Families) Unsheltered, 295, 30% Emergency Shelter, 613, 62% People in Households witr Adults Only Transitional Housing, Transitional Housing, 129, 43% 77, 8% Transitional Housing, 8, 36% Unsheltered, 1, 5% Emergency Shelter, 13, 59% 11 One Vision. One Plan. One Voice. One Spokane. Safer. Smarter. Healthier. 2009 2010 2011 0 17 2012 2013 Total People in HH with Adults and Children 16 17 10 2014 2015 2016 21 20 2017 2018 2019 Total People in HH with Adults Only Total People in HH with Children Only One Vision. One Plan. One Voice. One Spokane. Safer. Smarter. Healthier. Transgender, 6, 1% Gender Non -Conforming, 3, 0% Female, 511, 39% Male, 789, 60% 25 and Over, 1011, 77% AGE Under 18, 192, 15% 18 to 24, 106, 8% 13 One Vision. One Plan. One Voice. One Spokane. Safer. Smarter. Healthier. 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 84 43 26 17 and Under 18 to 24 640 Emergency Shelter Transitional Housing ■ Unsheltered 104 267 25 and Over One Vision. One Plan. One Voice. One Spokane. Safer. Smarter. Healthier. Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander, 0.60% American Indian and Alaska Native, 1.80% Black or African American, 2% Asian, 2.40% Multi -Racial, 4% White, 89.30% Asian, <0.1% American Indian and Alaska Native, 8% Black or African American,9% Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander, 2% Multi -Racial, 8% White, 73% One Vision. One Plan. One Voice. One Spokane. Safer. Smarter. Healthier. 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 - 0 758 n m 0 © 0 ® 6 0 26 White Black or African American Indian Asian Native Hawaiian or Multi -Racial American and Alaska Native Other Pacific Islander Families Adults Only ■ Children Only One Vision. One Plan. One Voice. One Spokane. Safer. Smarter. Healthier. 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 560 160 1 236 White 76 20 50 16 20 0 0 6 Black or African American Indian and American Alaska Native Asian Native Hawaiian or Multi -Racial Other Pacific Islander Emergency Shelter Transitional Housing ■ Unsheltered One Vision. One Plan. One Voice. One Spokane. Safer. Smarter. Healthier. Hispanic/Latino, 6% ETHNICITY (All People) Non-Hispanic/Non- Latino, 84% Hispanic/Latino, 8% Non-Hispanic/Non- Latino,192% One Vision. One Plan. One Voice. One Spokane. Safer. Smarter. Healthier. SHELTER TYPE BY ETHNICITY (All People) 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 181 246 Non-Hispanic/Non-Latino 58 rn 24 Hispanic/Latino u Emergency Shelter Transitional Housing ■ Unsheltered VETERANS One Vision. One Plan. One Voice. One Spokane. Safer. Smarter. Healthier. 85 Veterans were counted, representing a � 1.5% decrease from 2018 Unsheltered, 19, 22% Sheltered, 66, 78% 8% Veterans in Households with Adults and Children, 2, 2% Veterans in Households with Adults Only, 83, 98% 21 One Vision. One Plan. One Voice. One Spokane. Safer. Smarter. Healthier. 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Total Female Veterans Total Male Veterans 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 CHRONICALLY HOMELESS LEP One Vision. One Plan. One Voice. One Spokane. Safer. Smarter. Healthier. )_.3- chronically homeless were counted, representing a 6.5% decrease from 2018 Unsheltered, 84, 36% Sheltered, 147, 64% 23 Minor youth, under 18, identified as chronically homeless and was staying in an Emergency Shelter Veterans identified as chronically homeless, 13 stayed in Emergency Shelter and 10 were Unsheltered Households with Children, 7, 3% Households with Adults Only, 231, 97% 24 One Vision. One Plan. One Voice. One Spokane. Safer. Smarter. Healthier. 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 FAMILIES One Vision. One Plan. One Voice. One Spokane. Safer. Smarter. Healthier. FAMILIES verybody Counts 302 people in families with minor children were counting, representing an 8% decrease from 2018 Families are considered chronically homeless, of those: 6 families were in Emergency Shelter and 1 family was Unsheltered Transitional Housing, 129, 43% Unsheltered, 19, 6% Emergency Shelter, 154, 51% 27 One Vision. One Plan. One Voice. One Spokane. Safer. Smarter. Healthier. Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander, 0.60% American Indian and Alaska Native, 1.80% Black or African American, 2% Asian, 2.40% Multi -Racial, 4% RACE (Families) White, 89.30% Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander, 8% Asian, <0.1% American Indian and Alaska Native, 9% Black or African American,15% Multi -Racial, 9% WF e, 59% One Vision. One Plan. One Voice. One Spokane. Safer. Smarter. Healthier. 2009 2010 2011 Emergency Shelter 2012 2013 2014 2015 Transitional Housing 2016 2017 2018 2019 Unsheltered MINOR YOUTH \i One Vision. One Plan. One Voice. One Spokane. Safer. Smarter. Healthier. 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Emergency Shelter Transitional Housing Unsheltered Ihn One Vision. One Plan. One Voice. One Spokane. Safer. Smarter. Healthier. Everybody Counts Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander, 0.60% American Indian and Alaska Native, 1.80% Black or African American, 2% Asian, 2.40% Multi -Racial, 4% White, 89.30% Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander, 0% Asian, <0.1% American Indian and Alaska Native, 0% Black or African American,0% Multi -Racial, 14% W Ie, 86% YOUNG ADULTS One Vision. One Plan. One Voice. One Spokane. Safer. Smarter. Healthier. Transgender, 2, 2% Male, 51, 48% Gender Non -Conforming, 1, 1% Female, 52, 49% Household with Children and Adults, 18, 17% Households with Adults Only, 87, 83% 34 One Vision. One Plan. One Voice. One Spokane. Safer. Smarter. Healthier. Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander, 0.60% American Indian and Alaska Native, 1.80% Black or African American, 2% Asian, 2.40% Multi -Racial, 4% RACE (Young Adults) c Everybody Counts Asian, <0.1% American Indian and Alaska Native, 7% Black or African American,12% White, 89.30% Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander, 1% Multi -Racial, 9% One Vision. One Plan. One Voice. One Spokane. Safer. Smarter. Healthier. Unsheltered, 37, 35% Emergency Shelter, 43, 41% Transitional Housing, 26, 24% Households with Children, 26, 25% Households with Adults Only, 80, 75% 36 One Vision. One Plan. One Voice. One Spokane. Safer. Smarter. Healthier. Minor Youth (17 and under) Young Adults (18 to 24) 2018 2019 22 10%1 20 99 106 7%1 37 55+ v vv designed 6y 41 heepik.com 38 One Vision. One Plan. One Voice. One Spokane. Safer. Smarter. Healthier. Female, 60, 28% Male, 158, 72% Don't Know, 5, 2% Missing Information, 36, 17% Client Refused, 4, 2% Veteran, 50, 23% Not a Veteran, 123, 56% 39 One Vision. One Plan. One Voice. One Spokane. Safer. Smarter. Healthier. 30 25 20I 1 19 18 10 23 w J 0 W 015 0 • 13 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 74 76 77 78 85 AGE qua One Vision. One Plan. One Voice. One Spokane. Safer. Smarter. Healthier. Unsheltered, 5, 12% Transitional Housing, 3, 7% Emergency Shelter, 34, 81% 41 One Vision. One Plan. One Voice. One Spokane. Safer. Smarter. Healthier. Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander, 0.60% American Indian and Alaska Native, 1.80% Black or African American, 2% Asian, 2.40% Multi -Racial, 4% Multi -Racial, 11, 5% Black or African American, 17, 8% American Indian or Alaska Native, 17, 8% White, 89.30% SEN ORS EXPERIENCING HOMELESSNESS 42 White, 173, 79% OTHER POPULATIONS qua One Vision. One Plan. One Voice. One Spokane. Safer. Smarter. Healthier. verybody Cou is 318 adults counted reported experiencing serious mental illness 159 adults counted reported having a substance abuse condition F people counted reported living with HIV/AIDS or related illness 125 people counted reported being survivors of domestic violence 44 One Vision. One Plan. One Voice. One Spokane. Safer. Smarter. Healthier. ADULTS WITH SERIOUS MENTAL ILLNESS Unsheltered, 78, 25% Sheltered, 240, 75% ADULTS WITH A SUBSTANCE USE DISORDER Unsheltered, 52, 33% Sheltered, 107, 65% One Vision. One Plan. One Voice. One Spokane. Safer. Smarter. Healthier. ADULTS WITH HIV/AIDS Unsheltered, 4, 50% SHELTER TYPE (Other Populations) Sheltered, 4, 50% DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SURVIVORS Unsheltered, 35, 34% Sheltered, 67, 6W% One Vision. One Plan. One Voice. One Spokane. Safer. Smarter. Healthier. 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Severe Mental Illness Chronic Substance Abuse 0 2014 2015 2016 2017 14 0 2018 2019 Living with HIV/AIDS Survivors of Domestic Violence SHELTERED HOMELESS One Vision. One Plan. One Voice. One Spokane. Safer. Smarter. Healthier. Everybody Counts 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Emergency Shelter Transitional Housing UNSHELTERED HOMELESS One Vision. One Plan. One Voice. One Spokane. Safer. Smarter. Healthier. UNSHELTERED LOCATIONS c Everybody Counts 315 Unsheltered Individuals Outdoor Encampment, 34, 11% Under Bridge/Overpass, 31, 10% Bus, Train Station, Airport, 5, 1% Abandoned Building, 15, 5% Park, 9, 3% Vehicle, 79, 25% Other, 1, 0% Street or Sidewalk, 141, 45% 51 One Vision. One Plan. One Voice. One Spokane. Safer. Smarter. Healthier. 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 All People Experiencing Unsheltered Homelessness One Vision. One Plan. One Voice. One Spokane. Safer. Smarter. Healthier. TRENDS (Unsheltered Homeless) One Vision. One Plan. One Voice. One Spokane. Safer. Smarter. Healthier. PRIMARY REASON FOR HOMELESSNESS (Unsheltered Homeless) 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 10 ED 4 38 28 4 9 b • 1 28 • ED \N 02, �\� o c• m ��,a roc �J a •`• One Vision. One Plan. One Voice. One Spokane. Safer. Smarter. Healthier. OTHER REASON FOR HOMELESSNESS (Unsheltered Homeless) 100 90 80 70 60 50 94 58 40 30 20 10 — — 0 46 • 27 24 16 16II III 15 13 Lakes \ \c, o\zs �e '� • o�,��\0S, \)s \o,co� �\\o� •\O ,00 c. CP ok° Poo tee, • \c,,��c� 1 O �a o boa oo� P Lr <(a��. <c`e' a\\ \, 70 19 1 1 16 m �C�b. o ��� `oo .`" `0 �a��� �,o`o �''4• o4e1 �ri0 �e �• tea J`'e,a • ..k\0 fa fb. Qa o a• \i One Vision. One Plan. One Voice. One Spokane. Safer. Smarter. Healthier. TOP 10 REASONS FOR HOMELESSNESS (Homeless System) 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 28 63 45 35 37 74 28 25 Alcohol Drug Use Evicted Family Fleeing Lack of Lack of Lost Job Mental Other Use Conflict Domestic Affordable Income Health Violence Housing WHERE PEOPLE ARE FROM One Vision. One Plan. One Voice. One Spokane. Safer. Smarter. Healthier. LAST PERMANENTLY HOUSED BY STATE (Unsheltered Homeless) One Vision. One Plan. One Voice. One Spokane. LAST PERMANENTLY HOUSED BY WA COUNTY Safer. Smarter. Healthier. (Unsheltered Homeless) 200 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 El El 0 El El El 0 0 4 © 0 4 , .(;•A kei 184 0 0 .` co 00ec"� a �o oma Q�a ��or c,g ,�•� ��a �r �r One Vision. One Plan. One Voice. One Spokane. Safer. Smarter. Healthier. LAST PERMANENTLY BY JURISDICTION (Unsheltered Homeless) Everybody Counts City of Spokane & Spokane Valley, 14, 5% City of Spokane & Spokane County, 12, 5% City of Spokane, 132, 49% City of Spokane Valley, 9, 3% Other Jurisdiction, 85, 32% Spokane County, 8, 3% Spokane County & City of Airway Heights, 1, <1% Spokane County & City of Spokane Valles 8, 3% One Vision. One Plan. One Voice. One Spokane. Safer. Smarter. Healthier. NUMBER OF PEOPLE SURVEYED 120 102 100 - 80 60 40 41 20 - - ® Q Q Q Q Q Q Q 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 10 11 12 15 20 24 25 26 30 40 50 100 NUMBER OF EMERGENCY ROOM VISITS Sheltered Unsheltered THE KNOWLEDGE Point -in -Time Count data provides snapshot estimates used to inform collaborative solutions. The following slides include early impressions of successes and challenges. 62 qua One Vision. One Plan. One Voice. One Spokane. Safer. Smarter. Healthier. SUCCESSES Everybody _ - C For the second year in a row, Spokane County has seen a reduction in chronically homeless (21% decrease from 2017 to 2019). Of those, fewer people are unsheltered and more are coming inside and utilizing the shelter system. 8% fewer families are experiencing homelessness than in 2018. Despite a slight increase in youth homelessness in 2019, 100% more young people are in transitional housing than in the previous year. Transitional housing, while not a permanent housing solution, is a safe and stable place for young people to stay for up to 2 years. Spokane County continues to see a decrease in Veteran homelessness (28% since 2017), as we employ new best practice methodologies to end Veteran homelessness. 63 One Vision. One Plan. One Voice. One Spokane. Safer. Smarter. Healthier. CHALLENGES Everybody _ - C Over the last decade, Spokane County has seen a 46% increase in homelessness among single adults. Nearly one-third of single adults experience unsheltered homelessness, compared to only 6% of families and 5% of youth. 30% of those surveyed were experiencing homelessness for the first time. Racial minorities (specifically Black or African American, American Indian and Alaskan Natives, and Multi -Racial) make up a disproportionate share of the homeless population when compared to U.S. Census Data for the County. While Veteran homelessness has decreased in Spokane County, homelessness among female Veterans has increased. This mimics a national trend. 21 young adults reported being survivors of domestic violence. That equates to 17% of all those surveyed. 64 THE ACTION What is next given what we have learned this year. 65 One Vision. One Plan. One Voice. One Spokane. Safer. Smarter. Healthier. CONNECTION TO SERVICES Everybody Counts Improved access and coordination: Revisiting and redesigning the Coordinated Entry System Moving to a Diversion -First Model - Spokane Resource Center: A HUD EnVision Center - Outreach as a tool to prevent homelessness Training and support for the entire Continuum of Care on racial equity, bias, and sensitivity Engaging people with lived homeless experience to enhance the system and ensure it meets needs and is accessible to those who utilize it Offering more targeted services to meet individualized needs 66 One Vision. One Plan. One Voice. One Spokane. Safer. Smarter. Healthier. POVERTY REDUCTION The Homeless Crisis Response System is exiting more people into permanent housing each year over the last three years. The challenge is new people entering homelessness for the first time. Focused attention on poverty reduction and homelessness prevention is critical. Resource CENTER A HUD Envision Center 67 THANK You For questions, please contact: spokanechhs@spokanecity.org 68 To: From: Re: DRAFT ADVANCE AGENDA as of May 30, 2019; 11:00 a.m. Please note this is a work in progress; items are tentative Council & Staff City Clerk, by direction of City Manager Draft Schedule for Upcoming Council Meetings June 11, 2019, Special Meeting: 2020 Budget Workshop, 8:30 a.m. — 3:30 p.m., [due Tue June 41 June 11, 2019, 6 pm formal meeting cancelled June 18, 2019, Study Session, 6:00 p.m. [due Tue June 111 ACTION ITEMS: 1. Second Reading Ordinance 19-007 Amending Addressing Standards — Karen Kendall (15 minutes) 2. Proposed Resolution 19-009 Setting Privately -Initiated St. Vacation (Broadway Ave)- K. Kendall(10 min) 3. Motion Consideration: Pines GSP Preferred Design Selection — Gloria Mantz, Erica Amsden (10 minutes) 4. Mayoral Appointment: Interim Planning Commissioner — Mayor Higgins (5 minutes) NON -ACTION ITEMS 5. End of Legislative Session Report — members of Gordon Thomas Honeywell (40 minutes) 6. Visit Spokane Deliverables and Lodging Tax Award — Meg Winchester, Jamie Rand (20 minutes) 7. Re -opening 10th Avenue — Chad Riggs (10 minutes) 8. Proposed Code Text Amendment 2018-0006 Affordable Housing — Lori Barlow (20 minutes) 9. Transportation Improvement Board (TIB) Potential Grant — Adam Jackson (10 minutes) 10. Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins (5 minutes) Opportunity for General Public Comments [*estimated meeting: 145 mins] Tentative: Mon, June 24, 2019, Special Meeting, 6 p.m. Formal Format 1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) 2. Resolution Re -opening 10th Avenue — Chad Riggs 3. Admin Report: Street Vacation 2019-0001, Industrial Area — Connor Lange 4. Admin Report: Street Vacation 2019-0002, Baldwin Ave, Glenn Road — Connor Lang 5. Admin Report: Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins 6. Info Only: Department Reports June 25, 2019, Regular 6 pm Formal Meeting Cancelled (AWCAnnual Conference: June 25-28 Spokane Convention Center) 1due Tue June 171 (5 minutes) (10 minutes) (15 minutes) (15 minutes) (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting: 50 mins] July 2, 2019, Study Session, 6:00 p.m. ACTION ITEMS: 1. First Reading Ordinance Code Text Amendment 2018-0006 Affordable Housing — 2. Motion Consideration: Transportation Improvement Board (TIB) Potential Grant NON -ACTION ITEMS: 3. New Employee Report — John Whitehead 4. Street Vacation 2019-0001, Industrial Area — Connor Lange 5. Street Vacation 2019-0002, Baldwin Ave, Glenn Road — Connor Lang 6. Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins July 9, 2019, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. Proclamation: Parks and Recreation Month 1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) 2. First Reading Street Vacation Ordinance for 2019-0001, Industrial Area — Connor Lange 3. First Reading Street Vacation Ordinance for 2019-0002, Baldwin Ave, Glenn Rd — C. Lange 4. Admin Report: Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins [due Tue June 251 Lori Barlow(10 minutes) — Adam Jackson (10 min) (5 minutes) (15 minutes) (15 minutes) (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting: 60 mins] [due Tue July 21 Draft Advance Agenda 5/30/2019 11:17:01 AM (5 minutes) (10 minutes) (10 minutes) (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting: 30 mins] Page 1 of 2 July 16, 2019, Study Session, 6:00 p.m. [due Tue July 91 1. Council Goals/Priorities for use of Lodging Tax Advisory Committee (LTAC) Funds— C.Taylor (15 min) 2. Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting: mins] July 23, 2019, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. [due Tue July 161 Proclamation: Nick Mamer Days 1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) (5 minutes) 2. Second Reading Street Vacation Ordinance for 2019-0001, Industrial Area — Connor Lange (10 minutes) 3. Second Reading Street Vacation Ordinance for 2019-0002, Baldwin Ave, Glenn Rd — C. Lange (10 minutes) 4. Admin Report: Police Department Quarterly Report — Chief Werner 5. Admin Report: Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins 6. Info Only: Department Reports (10 minutes) (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting: mins] July 30, 2019, Study Session, 6:00 p.m. [due Tue July 231 ACTION ITEMS: 1. Motion: Council Goals/Priorities for Lodging Tax Advisory Committee (LTAC) funds-C.Taylor (10 min) NON -ACTION ITEMS: 2. Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting: mins] August 6, 2019, Study Session, 6:00 p.m. — Meeting cancelled Councilmembers attend National Night Out August 13, 2019, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. 1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) 2. Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins August 20, 2019, Study Session, 6:00 p.m. 1. 2020 Budget: Estimated Revenues & Expenditures — Chelsie Taylor 2. Council Draft 2020 Budget Goals — Chelsie Taylor 3. Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins August 27, 2019, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. 1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) 2. Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins 3. Info Only: Department Reports [due Tue Aug 61 (5 minutes) (5 minutes) [due Tue Aug 131 (10 minutes) (15 minutes) (5 minutes) [due Tue Aug 201 (5 minutes) (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting: mins] *time for public or Council comments not included OTHER PENDING AND/OR UPCOMING ISSUES/MEETINGS: Affordable Housing SHB 1406 Park Reg. Ord. amendments Appleway Trail Amenities PFD Presentation Camping in RVs Police Dept. Qtr Rpt (Jan, April, July, Oct) Crisis Co -response team funding Right -of -Way process Donation Recognition Sign Ordinance Duplexes, Townhouses, Cottages Snow Removal: St. Sidewalks Safe Rt to School Graffiti St. Illumination (ownership, cost, location) Health District Re SV Stats St. O&M Pavement Preservation Land Use Notice Requirements Studded Snow Tires Mirabeau Park Forestry Mgmt. Utility Facilities in ROW Naming City Facilities Protocol Water Districts & Green Space New Employee Qrt Rpt (Jan, April, July, Oct) Way Finding Signs Park Lighting Draft Advance Agenda 5/30/2019 11:17:01 AM Page 2 of 2