The URL can be used to link to this page

2020, 05-26 Regular Meeting AGENDA SPOKANE VALLEY CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING FORMAL FORMAT Tuesday,May 26,2020 6:00 p.m. Remotely via ZOOM Meeting 10210 E Sprague Avenue Council Requests Please Silence Your Cell Phones During Council Meeting NOTE: In response to Governor Inslee's March 24, 2020 Proclamation concerning our recent State of Emergency, which waives and suspends the requirement to hold in-person meetings and provides options for the public to attend remotely,all meeting guidelines contained in the Governance Manual are hereby superseded until the Governor's order has been rescinded or amended. Therefore,effective immediately and until further notice,a live feed of the meeting will be available on our website and on Comcast channel 14.Public comments will be accepted via the following links and must be received by 4:00 pm the day of the meeting. • Sign up to Provide Oral Public Comment at the Meeting via Calling-In • Submit Written Public Comment Prior to the Meeting • Join the Zoom Meeting CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL APPROVAL OF AGENDA INTRODUCTION OF SPECIAL GUESTS AND PRESENTATIONS: n/a MAYOR'S REPORT 1.PUBLIC HEARING: 2021-2026 Transportation Improvement Program—Adam Jackson [public comment] 2. Resolution 20-009 Adopting 2021-2026 Transportation Improvement Program—Adam Jackson [no public comment[ 3. CONSENT AGENDA: Consists of items considered routine which are approved as a group. Any member of Council may ask that an item be removed from the Consent Agenda to be considered separately. Proposed Motion:I move to approve the Consent Agenda. a.Approval of claim vouchers on May 26,2020,Request for Council Action Form Total: $1,335,370.43 b.Approval of Payroll for Pay Period Ending May 15,2020: $384,640.51 c.Approval of Council Meeting Minutes of May 12,2020 Regular Formal Format NEW BUSINESS: 4.Motion Consideration: CenterPlace Roof Bid Award—Bill Helbig [public comment] 5.Motion Consideration: Bureau of Justice Assistance COVID-19 Emergency Supplemental Funding Program—Morgan Koudelka [public comment] 6.Motion Consideration: Planning Commission Appointment—Mayor Wick [public comment] PUBLIC COMMENTS:Use the link above to sign up for oral public comments. The link will direct you to directions to sign up for oral public comments. This is an opportunity for the public to speak on any subject except those action items above, as public comments will be taken on those items where indicated. This is not an opportunity for questions or discussion.Remarks will be limited to three minutes per person. Council Agenda May 26,2020 Page 1 of 2 ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS: 7. Washington State Department of Transportation Land Acquisition,Flora Road—Cary Driskell 8. Pavement Preservation Program Update—Adam Jackson,Bill Helbig,John Hohman 9. Tourism Venues—John Hohman, Chelsie Taylor 10.Advance Agenda- Mayor Wick INFORMATION ONLY(will not be reported or discussed): 11. Department Monthly Reports CITY MANAGER COMMENTS ADJOURNMENT Council Agenda May 26,2020 Page 2 of 2 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: May 26, 2020 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: [' consent ❑ old business [' new business ® public hearing [' information ❑ admin. report [' pending legislation [' executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Public Hearing: Draft 2021-2026 Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 35.77.010, Perpetual advanced six-year plans for coordinated transportation program expenditures. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Annual adoption of the TIP and its amendments. BACKGROUND: The TIP is composed of transportation projects intended to be implemented in the next six years that address the transportation needs within the City of Spokane Valley. The City is required by RCW 35.77.010 to prepare and, after holding a public hearing, adopt a comprehensive transportation program for the ensuing six calendar years. This plan must be submitted to the Washington State Department of Transportation by June 30th of each year. The attached draft six-year TIP presents an integrated approach to project selection and phasing that has been aligned with recent master plans, upcoming redevelopment projects, economic development efforts, land use changes, stormwater and water district plans, and capital projects by partner agencies. The six-year TIP is required to be financially constrained. Currently the six-year TIP may exceed financial expectations; however, it does accurately reflect the City's short-term transportation needs and provides a prioritized path forward. OPTIONS: Conduct public hearing. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Conduct public hearing. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: The required City match on federal and state funded projects is typically between 10% and 20%. A review of projected REET funds through 2026 will be provided to determine if there are sufficient funds to provide the City's match for the recommended projects. STAFF CONTACT: Adam Jackson, P.E. — Planning & Grants Engineer ATTACHMENTS: PowerPoint Presentation 2021-2026 Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) May 26, 2020 Adam Jackson, P. E. - Planning & Grants Engineer S1oki11ii� jUalley� Transportation_Improvement Program ___ ___ c.II,c,, ,, 2021 - 2026 Six Year Purpose: .0,00Valle • Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Alb- _ Required by RCW 35 . 77.010 . * ., Must be rereferenced in CompPlan .. . . _. _„ ..„*„. _ , � A - r � � •: Required for REET expenditures Y -4.E 1111 , � °- � Required for grant eligibility -- 4-4-eL ' — ;yam f n, .s + i •A. i �v. a _ :r te 6 t iii ii, ii . 4 The Program (68 Total Projects) An integrated approach that aligns: r ._ ...,_, _ _iMaster plans and studies P. _ .- Upcoming redevelopment , -z Economic development efforts, '- - Land use changes, - 4: Sto r mwato r projects p -N Capital projects by partner agencies. -..,, ._„... , 3 2021 Closeout Projects (10 Projects) ar 1. Barker Rd. & I-90 WB Interchange I L 2. N. Sullivan Rd. ITS Project I i_ i 1 3. Adams Rd. Sidewalk . n 4. Conklin Rd. Sidewalk ,% � / _,. 04 5. 2020 Local Access Streets (Barker Rd. Homes) 4,... ... � 1,0 6. Ella Rd. S2 idewalkv. -1, 44-0, .......i., ' 7. Indiana Ave. Preservation - Evergreen to Sullivan -'' 7 . . __ - III.# 179] 8. Sullivan Rd. Bridge Deck Resurfac ,_ ,. ing � #' �.::. 8 - -. .1 ,._,---:,... ,J _._ 4Pla 7•?-.-4,_ ° , _,, Ih 9. Appleway Trail (Evergreen-Sullivan) in _ , _- - . , _ __�. .r ■ in . 10. Garland Ave. Extension F� - - RI_ Ikr: 1 ' �_....OW.me 11, Bil-_: —Ln 'ale I I I I M1 I 1 ilii 1—. , i.L I, illiCL, � 1 P. is 1 :; SII AI Z ' - . - '""' 1 21721- _ L}- 1- �; _ yam- 1 �IoE Pl n■ u� 1 I s i t 1 .*# I 1 r i -I NI 1111 ' -� "� 1 _ L s . T-^ !11 { -. I' ;. v icor.- I I E #4,---,—.. ..,, ,75:11 I . M a 1 rine -s -. fT, .,. ,...*2.4,-.... -.: '' -.i, 1,: �7y� �'.r - ''f,". I 7 .` 2;-,:1- M' ` _ *• lil iii 0al � ` tea'.? it _ r _..` . # r rt mrd} .. -gip-=— .7.7.--1 1 ; a Bridge & Grade Separation Projects (4 Projects) 31. Barker Rd. / BNSF Grade Separation _ ' Project 4 1 A ,• r, --. L_ � 32. Pines Rd. (SR27) / BNSF Grade - ati.21.ogra. � fie_ v �° . ti �'. Separation Project ;71' �E_ .- 1 .1. _1_- M- f_i. , 0.-----irel i . ±± 33. Sullivan Rd. / SR 290 Interchange �'-� 7 31 Reconstruction33 t r 1- ..., ... 1..` 56. Argonne Rd. & I-90 Interchange Bridge1 � �. _; _ - .,, Widening - -r� - 3 P F '� F• ! �. �„ r t 1.: ' _a1��i " ; r Q"� - 1 I, 1 L . t„ ! l 1 : _pro' t ara,'1 . _ _Py 1 i —j --. r� ;fir , - - ■ f J I ' _ . E 1j I I--- r---T ,�T 1 M - ! - 1 L 1 1- _,".• EIM i ii= V- IMIIMF III ma • I- 1 �- 4 _ IIT r ._ tai ° - _ -1_._ I -' i1 - r , mi. �. iiir _ ._ . . . . . _ - ` - •mow v. ,4,1111 r ! �. . • _ r-- •i _ 1 - r . rc 7 - fe:;•r ,—,— _ I .—,� _ I ' • 1 �Q — —I— 1_1 r ,, ,�.— , I. x P {Rpm �--. ° 1 ILILp A , 5 Intersection I m rovement Projects (15 Projects) p 11. Pines Rd. / Mission Ave. Intersection 16. Sullivan Rd. / Wellesley Ave. Intersection 19. Park Rd. / Mission Ave. Intersection 28. Sprague Ave. / Barker Rd. IntersectionI _6_ __1 i I 38. 8th Ave. / Carnahan Rd. Intersection • - _- - 43. Mirabeau / Mansfield Intersection ~-"" 48. Barker Rd. Intersections at 4th & 8th 0°. 1 .6.‘'''''1•=., 63 ., TV 49. Cataldo Ave. Realignment at Barker Rd. —� f. L- 1 + r 54. Flora Rd. / SR 290 Intersection ;~ 1 _--�-""� `� . ' 57. 8th Ave. / Park Rd. Intersection ''' L--- x e ; � 43 64 -f. 58. Pines Rd (SR-27) / 16th Intersection � - ' �, � } 19 : , l- ��t-H f- 1 , II . _ _ 'I r I ) 9 59. Barker Rd. / Boone Ave. Intersection - r ,Y , . .r ' I .1' {r: { _, .`– { mom j -_.-13.-T_-_-:_--,____ --4 r� —�a -161 62. 4th Ave. / Pines Rd. (SR 27) Intersection . x° r-74417. i y - ��; _ �' f4.T # ` t; 4 63. Sullivan Rd. Kiernan Ave. Intersection i / 0 y l� r _1_1,.11_[_-114- 1 l F_I I_ H_'-H______1_1_4„____,—_ 1 s i j ., i rF I k ; 2 64. Sullivan Rd. Marietta Ave. Intersection - - . r-rr _ „.::,-5-...-,---=_ J r-I., , -: --, , � . .. I. Y 9 . '1.-e.x IIS ..4._ 414. + 38 457 8 �T fiG` -r.;.7.t_ _-.I.,„„,,,,,„._,. .''�T Ilfik96ie1...i-n.b. �1 r r � �. , y,. . E S, -,r��`-�'� —c� -7.-----=75--LIT� X11--�"—�-- '� 'IIS!�i ,� �I �'�t �; it --.m+'-`4 .� I • ,. r----._.....3 f , — T1�'`- o F T;; .j- ` i1. 114' i ,- oto ' r4d15. r1 f 1 � '1 1 - ' rr ; t`- ,:Ait_r_d_: �' + g j i to 4 ,_ -,- , c 1 Y i_. T r y 'f—t- '�+ :�, N1fi \ °__ IQJ tom- .. fes* .�r ..■-----.::::f '..y tiA= } „ ,. g Reconstruction/ Preservation Projects (28 Projects) 15. Barker Rd. - Spokane River to Euclid 61. Barker Rd. - Mission to Interstate 90 17. Broadway Ave. Pres. - Havana to Fancher 65. Boone Ave. Reconstruction - Flora to Barker 18. 8th Ave. Pres. - Progress to Sullivan 66. Flora Rd. Reconstruction - Sprague to Indiana 22. Barker Rd. at Union Pacific Crossing 67. Euclid Ave. Preservation - Barker to E. City Limit 23. Sullivan Rd. Pres. - Sprague to 8th _ 68. Sullivan Rd. Improvements - Trent to Wellesley 24. Sullivan Rd. Pres. - 8th to 16th 1, :._-. 68 i5O---- 25. Argonne Rd. Concrete - Indiana to Montgomery • 26. Evergreen Rd Pres. - Sprague to Mission ; --- _; -- ------ 45 22 67 27. Balfour Park Frontage Improvements �,r25-- 37. -' Sullivan Rd Pres. i fr 16th Ave. to City Limit ' w-. 46 39. Mission Ave. Pres. - Mullan to University39 ,. . 2 .... 66 7 40. S. Bowdish Rd. Corridor Improvements i1- �_ re: 4 Lill 1 -; - . _ 61 41. Dishman-Mica Rd. Pres. - Schafer to S. City Limit 27 F H--rr - If ;- 42 � e �aw r 60 44 42. Mullan Rd. Pres. - Broadway to Mission 52 1r 23 t r �.=-,„(_ f-E4-----D3.- 1 r Apr—�.s Y 53 44. Barker Rd. Improvements - Appleway to 1-90 •,, :_ . I E li— � _ �. ,fir �8 45. Flora Rd. Reconstruction - Euclid to Garland _ =t,; .4 �" - F ___ 40 24 46. Park Rd. Pres. - Sprague to Trent '_. -' "e� y -1—a ' 37 tp„r 47. Vera Crest + Rocky Ridge Street Reconstruction 47 -47 50. WellesleyAve. Pres. - Sullivan to Flora 51_ ; f �- 51. 32nd Ave. Pres. - Pines to SR 27 --- _ 52. 8th Ave. Pres. - Havana to Park ' 53. Barker Rd. Improvement - Appleway to S. City Limit +- ; ° 41 -- 60. Broadway Ave. Improvements - Flora to Barker ''� Citywide Projects (6 Projects) 12. Citywide Reflective Post Panels (2018) --- __,-, 13. Citywide Reflective Signal Backplates (2018) .0---.,... _ • 211 . City of Spokane Valley __ - -1 1 II. 1 1r'^ 21. Pedestrian & Bicycle Safety Analysis r ,l�_. 34. Street Preservation Projects - $3M Annually Local Road Safety Plan _ ; - Crash Data Time Period:2014-2018 IIIIIII , ❑ l fl.rMr• w: Ll 35. Local Access Street Improv. - $1.5M Annually M� 5. ,s,�- ,,,,,�.� w • i nate:March 2,2020 = y ❑ - 36. Citywide Safety Projects - Biennial update tothe 1.,19.=nla,bo 0..-a�Soeh.�ss, r(20t==a=6) - mEE oma= _ �� _- =_ � It Developed with assistance from the Washington state Department of ---- ; ,__ _ Transportation and the FHWASysiemir Safety Project Selection Tool --' , '" _ , -- �- '. - 3 Spokanev yDepartmentd cnmmunnye Public works _ , Engineering bivIsinn __ •'t^ t--r ../4s..... 7 WSDOT • _ Spokane �" 5 t��: Walley° r ,- .- • ? � � N 6. .. ; 1 F, - -, , ' ' ,,136 ..... ' _ • , .i. „ . 1 - . , .._ a , li 4r : ;1 - 344' :A,..-. ... . - �_ ; L. o t` _ _ - _ _ ,[ - ,-,-....ffc , - . Legend ,:12 \; -�., . -4 • •-- G Citywide Signal Backplates • • _ ” .... ,` — --- -'''''t. I 1 I 744 ; - —•• y — Safety Priority 1 Streets 2r TI r iSafety Priority 2 Streets' _ _• o • P 3,500 i,P00 19,bW 21,OP0 Feet^ [ __ r\ _ •1• 1N 1- ! a ' _..! • I_._ c +I7 - Legend LL —f°" ca Safety Priority I Streets i Good a 3.264 sero 17 e0a 1>a.sia ren Safety PiloPiloety 2 Streets g Awe 9.900 ,9,000 V.099 F.' 1 N l • r N r I , 1 , • r .—a Si dewalk, Trail , and Sto rmwate r Projects (5 Projects) .uplmitli 14. Park Rd. Sidewalk 1 20. Appleway Blvd. Stormwater Improvements - --71 -I - "' '' - 1 -,1 ----- ,. 29. Sprague Ave. Stormwater Improvements 30. Wilbur Rd. Sidewalk - Boone to Mission 55. Appleway Trail - University to Dishman Mica 1 A ,.---- - 30 1.---1-'4-:tit---e-c-- -- -'t 7 -F 1 -- r74--.11:IL- - _itia--- - ._.-.J. --- i 1 - --.--, -.- i .it d , 1 'I ' - '7 1'..1-. ---1 .1.4. ---'-'r - 1------4 LI.,1- [ tj, , : H , I Hi ' I. _,1_,__I___ i ;_-. i.---- - - • 0 ----- . . : . --. -___:1--- 1-----, ----,-, _ . ..., . • __- ,_ _., . ..1.:1 • i: r- - -, :4: .14 ; 1 . .1 -••• .. _. 1 , L _ _____ 4 • _ . .. , _ . - , ' - 4 _,4_ . 1_, , ,,,-- -1 11.1 - .----• .7.-H, .,7-. _ ..- , 1 ''L— --. ,-,-.P.' ....-- - •• J • 1.1.-1 ' . 4 . T.: [i 55 20 ..., ,ililL44111,, ,,,•,... ,;-,,,.'_...,-.--9r-..r--,--.v.,- . .-----.--,,,, . - . .. . -. -, , • QuesLions • ,...,, J... ..10 N. • .• . .-- i r\ 1 .1 •s, , 1611, n .-„, ..... , z--- .....0'‘ i 'III . . .. .....,_ .... . .............. .., r, . i i ,..,_,".._ , . :. 11, !Iniii. ... t . . .0 - . . .... . a - '.- J . .,...•". di ingimak.ai-. II . II. r•Il ,0 .1.1 I.: . .w."'. ' ,. .;''': .1_7.:_,_ . —..'1/'.. L ‘: i ,.''' r . ' ''' '=" Fil— C' . °"....." -.4'''' WT.'''''' .17..." . --i"Ai-1 . '; ' .almws, 3. ''' I .- a ' . 7 --_ •-L-z-,- .7--, . . , • I I - - i ,,. , , 1i &' --r— • ii- 4_ _", _ - - . ----I-, - 1, , .... - I • _..- I - , _ ..... '.• . I I ..., - ,.! i J1 -P-- - ' - '. /4. t, , I- I 1 _U _1-1. ' Aili ' -='-'-'--- e.- 1.. 1 1--ii---' . .. L ;1- t_ __ __ ' ""- '1in . _, 1 1 I L. !._,,..... I , r H 7 r ;P ILL I ' ' , a H . 1 --;L----- FV" I .4. -1--T-4 - ,_ ,. zwiFnirFF-.7717= Trite!' 1 ,_ ,_ k_i_ L- I.,, 1 t-- •11' .11 1 ff"' _..L. I----T. _ - -- '.... . iir — -- 1111..1-- -'- r ' "_,..ri L. I -' ''' /- ' - -r-':-,- .! - • ---j_wirRel ° 1 I 4 ..- • - • - --- 1..--. ---I Try co- I - I . riiii - i .'. P.- I--- -, . AI _- ..s.—.' 1 ... 4. ..... '. .6_, -irn.-I mmi - 1 ---• ,- . . . ... . • _ . , • -- ---L- 1_: _I i. r- IN- I.-. I'•- I I, ft i It I .... 4 $ I E .... . , , -.. .:. .,.1._ 1, It ilt '-...;,- la Aira .'''"i:.:..--1.:-:-.._ "..;: -. sh' •dm ' -'_,it',...., 4,.. :'-1.-t_.,mal.. . —ffs_ .7'-', i i 1) II 'Fi, 1 •-- I 1 -.,- '.....:.,.-,t ... 61. I -.L'..-=11'..- i tr -' f 7i---1 , . - ,-- - "44,,....- ..-7.--: I A, I $ I $ I Ip; r. 7,"-. ..jr:. ..p I— :,..r l: I I . _ , ' - I I .. I 4... I I '. I m..... I .I. r .....I 4 i I • I I - I 4I I I- I I-- I -- I . . II--- .0' I._ • CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: May 26, 2020 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: [' consent ❑ old business ® new business [' public hearing [' information ❑ admin. report [' pending legislation [' executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Resolution 20-009: Approval of Draft 2021-2026 Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 35.77.010, Perpetual advanced six-year plans for coordinated transportation program expenditures. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Annual adoption of the TIP and its amendments. BACKGROUND: The TIP is composed of transportation projects intended to be implemented in the next six years that address the transportation needs within the City of Spokane Valley. The City is required by RCW 35.77.010 to prepare and, after holding a public hearing, adopt a comprehensive transportation program for the ensuing six calendar years. This plan must be submitted to the Washington State Department of Transportation by June 30th of each year. The attached draft six-year TIP presents an integrated approach to project selection and phasing that has been aligned with recent master plans, upcoming redevelopment projects, economic development efforts, land use changes, stormwater and water district plans, and capital projects by partner agencies. The six-year TIP is required to be financially constrained. Currently the six-year TIP may exceed financial expectations; however, it does accurately reflect the City's short-term transportation needs and provides a prioritized path forward. OPTIONS: Adopt the 2021-2026 Six-Year TIP as presented or take other action. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to approve Resolution 20-009, adopting the 2021-2026 Six-Year TIP as presented. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: The required City match on federal and state funded projects is typically between 10% and 20%. A review of projected REET funds through 2026 will be provided to determine if there are sufficient funds to provide the City's match for the recommended projects. STAFF CONTACT: Adam Jackson, P.E. — Planning & Grants Engineer ATTACHMENTS: Resolution 20-009 2021-2026 Six-Year TIP Report DRAFT CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY SPOKANE COUNTY,WASHINGTON RESOLUTION 20-009 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING THE 2021-2026 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, AND OTHER MATTERS RELATING THERETO. WHEREAS,to provide for the proper and necessary development of the street system within the City of Spokane Valley, the City shall, as required by State law, develop and adopt annually a Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program (Six-Year TIP) with such program acting as a guide for the coordinated development of the City's transportation system; and WHEREAS,the Six-Year TIP of the City shall specifically set forth those projects and programs of both City and regional significance that benefit the transportation system and promote public safety and efficient vehicle movements; and WHEREAS, the Six-Year TIP shall be consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan and be adopted following one or more public hearings before the City Council; and WHEREAS, a draft copy of the Six-Year TIP was submitted to the Washington State Department of Commerce and has been reviewed and approved prior to the scheduled adoption of the TIP in accordance with RCW 36.70A.106; and WHEREAS, the City Council conducted a public hearing on May 26, 2020 for the purpose of inviting and receiving public comment on the proposed Six-Year TIP. NOW THEREFORE,be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley, Spokane County,Washington,as follows: Section 1. The City Council hereby adopts the attached Six-Year TIP for the City of Spokane Valley for the purpose of guiding the design, development and construction of local and regional transportation improvements for the years 2021 through 2026. The City Clerk is directed to file the 2021- 2026 Six-Year TIP with the Washington State Secretary of Transportation before June 30, 2020. The Six- Year TIP shall be reviewed at least annually for the purpose of determining the work to be accomplished under the program and the City's transportation requirements. Projects and timeframes identified in the Six-Year TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, and are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions. Section 2. Effective Date. This Resolution shall be in full force and effect upon adoption. Adopted this 26th day of May,2020. ATTEST: City of Spokane Valley Christine Bainbridge,City Clerk Ben Wick,Mayor Approved as to Form: Office of the City Attorney Resolution 20-009,Adopting Six-Year TIP sitiokane 2021 - 2026 Six Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) y Valle g M .-. 1 . ��' -..".....--.¢.. . • rt , tw.."r,"t.- •• - gib.' r �. f,r�. ° ,_ .� - - �rrrlP .;, r _ - II 1 ' ~-. '�,� ---,,--x.----- _ _. r A�' :: tea., ! v , I rrr_r� -- � � � 'fix g" .11 N(1' Vt. .— .' . —' ,,-,yr. -___Iit- -- "41W1 pr----- - _, P.P.:, 4. '�' Tom. ,� ' • - w .•_ II,P1.-" r',�"'"'r+ "M1..c'r "'+:"r^r•f. `. R _ _" �_ +�r, •-tear * IA! } . t �. , . AA:4 1.1. Cie . r ,` -11 w: IA ' Br711 1, ' T a _ � Y. 4 _ • a s ,a _ `•.. PM, i • If j �. City of Spokane Valley Community & Public Works Department p ImprovementProgram (TIP) Spokane 2021-2026 Transportation Walley Glossary & Abbreviations Project Phases: Funding Sources: • PE Preliminary Engineering • City City Funds • RW Right-of-Way • CDBG Community Development Block Grant • CN Construction • CMAQ Congestion Management/Air Quality • COM Washington Department of Commerce Zoning • DEV Private Developer Funds • FHWA Federal Highway Administration R1 • FMSIB Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board R2 • FTA Federal Transit Authority • HSIP Highway Safety Improvement Program R3 • NHFP National Highway Freight Program • Other Misc. Unidentified Funding Sources POS • RCO Washington State Recreation Conservation Office MF • REET Real Estate Excise Tax • RR Railroad NC • SRTS Safe Routes to School MU • SW City Stormwater Funds • STA Spokane Transit Authority CMU • STBG Surface Transportation Block Grant RC • STBG-SA Surface Transportation Block Grant—Set Aside • TIB Transportation Improvement Board IMU • WAL Washington Legislature • WSDOT Washington Department of Transportation ,,�„ d 2021 - 2026 Spokane Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program alleDollars in Thousands Funding Project/Description/Current Status/Length Total Sources 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Total 1 Barker Rd. & 1-90 WB Interchange 90 WSDOT 90 90 Description: Partnership with WSDOT for PE of westbound I-90/Barker interchange roundabout. Status: Funding Status: Secured PE 90 90 2019-20 PE,2021 Closeout. Future CN by WSDOT. RW 0 Length (miles):0 CN 0 Total 90 90 2 N. Sullivan Rd. ITS Project 14 City 2 2 CMAQ 12 12 Description: Extend Intelligent Transportation Systems conduit and controls along Sullivan Corridor. Status: Funding Status: Secured PE 0 2020 CN,2021 Closeout. Secured RW 0 Length (miles):2 Secured CN 14 14 Total 14 14 3 Adams Rd. Sidewalk 8 City 2 2 TIB 6 6 Description: New sidewalk and stormwater on the east side from 16th to 22nd. Status: Funding Status: Secured PE 0 2020 CN,2021 Closeout. RW 0 Length (miles):0.4 Secured CN 8 8 Total 8 8 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances. 4/29/2020 Page 1 2021 - 2026 pokane Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program ..10001 Valley Dollars in Thousands Funding Project/Description/Current Status/Length Total Sources 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Total 4 Conklin Rd. Sidewalk 3 City CDBG 3 3 Description: New sidewalk on the west side from Appleway Trail to Riceland Lane. Status: Funding Status: Secured PE 0 2020 CN,2021 Closeout. Secured RW 0 Length (miles):0.0 Secured CN 3 3 Total 3 3 5 2020 Local Access Streets (Barker Rd. Homes) 35 City 35 35 Description: County sewer partnership. City to reimburse County for paving and stormwater costs. Status: Funding Status: Secured PE 0 2020 CN,2021 Closeout. RW 0 Length (miles):2 Secured CN 35 35 Total 35 35 6 Ella Rd. Sidewalk 8 City 1 1 CDBG 7 7 Description: New sidewalk on the west side from Broadway Ave.to Alki Ave. Status: Funding Status: Secured PE 0 2020 CN,2021 Closeout. Secured RW 0 Length (miles):0.2 Secured CN 8 8 Total 8 8 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances. 4/29/2020 Page 2 2021 - 2026 pokane Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program ValleyDollars in Thousands Funding Project/Description/Current Status/Length Total Sources 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Total 7 Indiana Ave. Preservation - Evergreen to Sullivan 38 City 38 38 Description: Pavement preservation project with stormwater and signal improvements as necessary. Status: Funding Status: Planned PE 0 2019 PE,2020 CN,2021 Closeout."Other"funding:TIB or City. RW 0 Length (miles):0.9 Planned CN 38 38 Total 38 38 8 Sullivan Rd. Bridge Deck Resurfacing 5 City Other Fed 5 5 Description: Resurface existing bridge deck for Sullivan Road northbound over UPRR tracks. Status: Funding Status: Planned PE 0 2020 CN,2021 Closeout. Program delays may push CN to 2021. Planned RW 0 Length (miles):0 Planned CN 5 5 Total 5 5 9 Appleway Trail - Evergreen to Sullivan 45 City 6 6 CMAQ 35 35 Description: STSG-SA 4 4 Construct shared-use pathway along public utility corridor. Status: Funding Status: Secured PE 0 2020 CN,2021 Closeout. Secured RW 0 Length (miles):1 Secured CN 45 45 Total 45 45 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances. 4/29/2020 Page 3 .,t,,,s„ 2021 - 2026 pokane Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program ValleyDollars in Thousands Funding Project/Description/Current Status/Length Total Sources 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Total 10 Garland Ave. Extension Project 60 City 30 30 DEV 30 30 Description: Construct 3-lane urban section between Flora and Barker. Status: Funding Status: Secured PE 0 2019-2020 CN,2021 Closeout. Secured RW 0 Length (miles):1 Secured CN 60 60 Total 60 60 11 Pines Rd. / Mission Ave. Intersection Improvement 1,320 City 68 109 177 CMAQ 440 703 1,143 Description: A two-phased project with signal and channelization upgrades to improve capacity(Phase 1)and additional turn lanes on Pines(Phase 2). Status: Funding Status: Partial PE 10 120 130 Phase 1 ($588k)funded by CMAQ for 2021 CN,potential for Developer Partial RW 32 32 funds via Mirabeau Subarea Traffic Study. Phase 2 is unfunded. Length (miles): Intersection Partial CN 498 660 1,158 Total 508 812 1,320 12 Citywide Reflective Post Panels (2018) 36 City HSIP 36 36 Description: Installation of reflective post panels to stop signs and speed limit signs on select streets. Status: Funding Status: Secured PE 0 2020-2021 CN RW 0 Length (miles):0 Secured CN 36 36 Total 36 36 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances. 4/29/2020 Page 4 2021 - 2026 pokane Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program ValleyDollars in Thousands Funding Project/Description/Current Status/Length Total Sources 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Total 13 Citywide Reflective Signal Backplates (2018) 82 City HSIP 82 82 Description: Installation of reflective backplate panels at select traffic signals. Status: Funding Status: Secured PE 0 2020-2021 CN RW 0 Length (miles):0 Secured CN 83 83 Total 82 82 14 Park Rd. Sidewalk 688 City 275 275 TIB 413 413 Description: New sidewalk on west side from Sharp to Mission with potential marked crossing at Sharp or Cataldo. Status: Funding Status: Secured PE 5 5 2020 PE,2021 CN. RW 0 Length (miles):0.2 Secured CN 683 683 Total 688 688 15 Barker Rd. Improvements-Spokane River to Euclid 566 City 2 2 STBG 353 353 Description: FMSIB 178 178 Reconstruct and widen to 3-lane urban section to east leg of Euclid. HSIP 33 33 DEV Status: Funding Status: Secured PE 0 2020-2021 CN Secured RW 0 Length (miles):0.5 Secured CN 566 566 Total 566 566 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances. 4/29/2020 Page 5 K-1,,,,,),-,00,\•......._ 2021 - 2026 poaneSix-Year Transportation Improvement Program .0000 Valley Dollars in Thousands Funding Project/Description/Current Status/Length Total Sources 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Total 16 Sullivan Rd. /Wellesley Ave. Intersection Improvement 1,460 City 98 98 196 CMAQ 632 632 1,264 Description: Spo.Co. Traffic signal and intersection improvement project, partnership with Spokane County. Status: Funding Status: Secured PE 0 2019-2020 PE&ROW,2021 CN,2022 Closeout. Secured RW 0 Length (miles): Intersection Secured CN 730 730 1,460 Total 730 730 1,460 17 Broadway Ave. Preservation- Havana to Fancher 2,910 City 578 12 590 Other 2,274 46 2,320 Description: Pavement preservation,including stormwater improvements as necessary. Status: Funding Status: Secured PE 10 10 2020 PE.2021 CN Possible funding via TIB or City Fund 311. Planned RW 0 Length (miles):1 Planned CN 2,842 58 2,900 Total 2,852 58 2,910 18 8th Ave. Preservation - Progress to Sullivan 655 City 578 12 590 Other 64 1 65 Description: Potential partnership with Vera Water&Power for sidewalk extension on south side along frontage of Vera's property. Status: Funding Status: Planned PE 5 5 2020 PE with City funds,potential Fund 311 project in future CN years. RW 0 Length (miles):0.2 Planned CN 637 13 650 Total 642 13 655 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances. 4/29/2020 Page 6 .,t,,,s„ 2021 - 2026 pokane Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program ValleyDollars in Thousands Funding Project/Description/Current Status/Length Total Sources 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Total 19 Park Rd. / Mission Ave. Intersection Improvement 1,252 City 68 1,184 1,252 Description: Improve channelization and signal operations. Status: Funding Status: Planned PE 20 20 2021 PE+RW,2022 CN. Planned RW 48 12 60 Length (miles):0 Planned CN 1,172 1,172 Total 68 1,184 1,252 20 Appleway Blvd. Stormwater Improvements 895 Other State 659 13 672 City 219 4 223 Description: Improve stormwater facilities between University and Farr. Funded by Dept.of Ecology. Status: Funding Status: Secured PE 45 45 2020 PE,2021 CN,2022 Closeout.25%local match. Secured RW 0 Length (miles):0.6 Secured CN 833 17 850 Total 878 17 895 21 Pedestrian &Bicycle Safety Analysis 50 City 25 25 50 Description: Evaluate crash history of vehicle versus pedestrian/bicyclists on City streets,as identified in the 2020 Local Road Safety Plan. Status: Funding Status: PE 25 25 50 PE only. May be staff-led with support from consultant team.Sprague,SR RW 0 27,and Sullivan have majority of sever pedestrian crashes. Length (miles):0 CN 0 Total 25 25 50 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances. 4/29/2020 Page 7 K-1,,,,,),-,00,\•......._ 2021 - 2026 poaneSix-Year Transportation Improvement Program ValleyDollars in Thousands Funding Project/Description/Current Status/Length Total Sources 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Total 22 Barker Rd. at Union Pacific Crossing 1,339 City 776 15 791 FMSIB 269 5 274 Description: STBG 110 2 112 Reconstruct and widen to 3-lane urban section between Euclid intersection HSIP 159 3 162 legs and install shared-use path from river to Trent. Status: Funding Status: PE 17 17 2020 PE+RW,2021 CN RW 25 25 Length (miles):0 CN 1,273 26 1,299 Total 1,314 25 1,339 23 Sullivan Rd. Preservation -Sprague to 8th 1,400 City 80 280 360 Other 1,040 1,040 Description: Pavement preservation with signal,sidewalks and stormwater improvements as necessary. Status: Funding Status: Planned PE 80 20 100 Seeking funds,candidate for TIB or STBG preservation funding.Assumes Planned RW 0 20%City match for CN. Length (miles):0.3 Planned CN 1,300 1,300 Total 80 1,320 1,400 24 Sullivan Rd. Preservation-8th to 16th 1,400 City 80 280 360 Other 1,040 1,040 Description: Pavement preservation with signal,sidewalks and stormwater improvements as necessary. Status: Funding Status: PE 80 20 100 Seeking funds,candidate for TIB or STBG preservation funding.Assumes RW 0 20%City match for CN. Length (miles):0.3 CN 1,300 1,300 Total 80 1,320 1,400 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances. 4/29/2020 Page 8 K-1,,,,,),-,00,\•......._ 2021 - 2026 poaneSix-Year Transportation Improvement Program .1000 Valley Dollars in Thousands Funding Project/Description/Current Status/Length Total Sources 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Total 25 Argonne Rd. Concrete Pavement- Indiana to 5,044 City 646 430 1,076 Montgomery TIB 1,139 779 1,918 Description: STBG 1,210 840 2,050 Reconstruct with concrete and improve signal timing at Montgomery. Status: Funding Status: Secured PE 25 25 2020 PE. TIB funds Montgomery intersection in 2021.SRTC funds Indiana Secured RW 20 20 to Montgomery in 2022 or 2023. Length (miles):0.3 Partial CN 2,950 2,050 5,000 Total 2,995 2,049 5,044 26 Evergreen Rd. Preservation -Sprague to Mission 2,000 Other 72 1,498 30 1,600 City 18 374 8 400 Description: Pavement preservation project. Status: Funding Status: Planned PE 90 10 100 2021 PE,20212CN,2023 Closeout."Other"funding:TIB or City Fund 311. RW 0 Length (miles):0.9 Planned CN 1,862 38 1,900 Total 90 1,872 38 2,000 27 Balfour Park Frontage Improvements 1,910 City 1,872 38 1,910 Description: Pavement preservation,widen paved shoulder,install curb and sidewalk on Herald, Main and Balfour. Status: Funding Status: PE 10 10 2020 PE,2021 CN. Partially funded REET,local street wear fee,CDBG, RW 0 Length (miles):0.4 CN 1,862 38 1,900 Total 1,872 38 1,910 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances. 4/29/2020 Page 9 .t,,,s„ 2021 - 2026 ,SPOkarie Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program .1000 Valley Dollars in Thousands Funding Project/Description/Current Status/Length Total Sources 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Total 28 Sprague Ave. /Barker Rd. Intersection Improvement 2,139 City 175 1,497 30 1,702 CMAQ 342 7 349 Description: DEV 74 14 88 Provide new roundabout and with sidewalks and bike accommodations. Status: Funding Status: Secured PE 33 33 2021 PE+RW,2022 CN. Partial CMAQ funded for 2022 authorization, Partial RW 216 54 270 potential TIB candidate. Length (miles): Intersection Partial CN 1,798 37 1,835 Total 249 1,853 37 2,139 29 Sprague Ave. Stormwater Improvements 2,000 Other State 74 1,398 28 1,500 City 24 466 10 500 Description: Drywell retrofits between University and Park. Funded by Dept.of Ecology. Status: Funding Status: Secured PE 98 2 100 2021 PE,2022 CN,2023 Closeout.25% Local match. RW 0 Length (miles):2 Secured CN 1,862 38 1,900 Total 98 1,864 38 2,000 30 Wilbur Rd. Sidewalk-Boone to Mission 646 City 9 134 3 146 STBG-SA 56 435 9 500 Description: Install sidewalk from Boone to Mission on one side of road. Status: Funding Status: Secured PE 48 12 60 2021 PE,2022 CN. Secured RW 16 4 20 Length (miles):0.3 Secured CN 553 11 564 Total 65 569 12 646 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances. 4/29/2020 Page 10 .,t,,,0,-.400"\•......._ 2021 - 2026 p4 �arieSix-Year Transportation Improvement Program .1000 Valley Dollars in Thousands Funding Project/Description/Current Status/Length Total Sources 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Total 31 Barker Rd. /BNSF Grade Separation Project 21,033 City 1,210 1,210 1,210 3,630 NHFP 2,000 2,000 2,000 6,000 Description: TIGER 2,034 2,034 2,034 6,102 Construct Grade Separation at Barker/BNSF RR/Trent(SR290). FMSIB 1,667 1,667 1,667 5,001 WAL Other 100 100 100 300 Status: Funding Status: Secured PE 0 Assumes 50% ROW in 2019. Secured RW 0 Length (miles): Intersection Secured CN 7,010 7,010 7,010 21,030 Total 7,011 7,011 7,011 21,033 32 Pines Rd. (SR27)/ BNSF Grade Separation Project 28,127 City 1,267 456 872 1,744 1,744 6,083 STBG 1,894 1,894 3,788 Description: Other Fed 811 811 Construct Grade Separation at Pines/BNSF RR/Trent(SR290). Other 3,489 6,978 6,978 17,445 Status: Funding Status: Secured pE 1,621 1,621 2020 PE Start."Other"assumes 20%City match. Secured RW 2,350 2,350 4,700 Length (miles): Intersection Partial CN 4,361 8,722 8,722 21,806 Total 3,972 2,350 4,361 8,722 8,722 28,127 33 Sullivan Rd. /SR 290 Interchange Reconstruction 26,630 City 636 636 636 433 55 4,520 6,916 Other 159 159 159 936 221 18,080 19,714 Description: Reconstruct interchange to improve safety and capacity. Status: Funding Status: Planned pE 795 795 795 265 2,650 City initiate PE in 2021,seek RW+CN funding by 2025. Planned RW 1,104 276 1,380 Length (miles):0 Planned CN 22,600 22,600 Total 795 795 795 1,369 276 22,600 26,630 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances. 4/29/2020 Page 11 K-1,,,,,),-,00,\•......._ 2021 - 2026 p4ri� Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program WalleyDollars in Thousands Funding Project/Description/Current Status/Length Total Sources 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Total 34 Street Preservation Projects-$3M Annually 18,000 City 3,600 3,600 3,600 3,600 3,600 18,000 Description: Preservation projects,typically arterials or collectors,or used as matching funds for grants. Status: Funding Status: Planned PE 100 100 100 100 100 500 Specified projects in TIP my duplicate this annual placeholder. Projects RW 0 may include storm and sidewalk upgrades as applicable. Length (miles): Varies Planned CN 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 17,500 Total 3,600 3,600 3,600 3,600 3,600 18,000 35 Local Access Street Improvements-$1.5M Annually 9,000 City 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 9,000 Description: Funded by Street Wear Fee. Project type varies(surface treatments, grind/inlays,reconstruction Status: Funding Status: Secured pE 100 100 100 100 100 100 600 Site selection is on-going.Actual locations to be determined. Secured RW 0 Length (miles): Secured CN 1,400 1,400 1,400 1,400 1,400 1,400 8,400 Total 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 9,000 36 Citywide Safety Projects-Biennial 1,748 HSIP 433 86 433 86 433 102 1,573 City 48 10 48 10 48 11 175 Description: Projects are consistent with the City's Local Road Safety Plan.Awarded projects specified in TIP. Status: Funding Status: Planned PE 11 22 11 22 11 23 100 Costs assume project implementation in odd-number years and RW 0 design/close-out in even-numbered years. 10%local match. Length (miles):0 Planned CN 476 85 476 85 476 102 1,700 Total 481 96 481 96 481 113 1,748 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances. 4/29/2020 Page 12 K-1,,,,,),-,00,\•......._ 2021 - 2026 poaneSix-Year Transportation Improvement Program ValleyDollars in Thousands Funding Project/Description/Current Status/Length Total Sources 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Total 37 Sullivan Rd. Preservation- 16th to S. City Limit 2,200 City 80 1,700 1,780 Other 420 420 Description: Pavement preservation with signal,sidewalks and stormwater improvements as necessary. Status: Funding Status: Planned PE 80 20 100 Seeking funds,candidate for TIB or STBG preservation funding.Assumes Planned RW 0 20%City match for CN. Length (miles):0.8 Planned CN 2,100 2,100 Total 80 2,120 2,200 38 8th Ave. /Carnahan Rd. Intersection Improvement 2,000 City 35 50 315 400 Other 140 200 1,260 1,600 Description: Add intersection control(turn lanes,potential signal). Status: Funding Status: Planned PE 175 175 Assumes 20%City match. OTHER may be TIB, DEV or City. Planned RW 250 250 Length (miles): Intersection Planned CN 1,575 1,575 Total 175 250 1,575 2,000 39 Mission Ave. Preservation -Mullan to University 1,880 City 50 77 1,718 35 1,880 Description: Pavement preservation and possible widening project with stormwater improvements as necessary. Status: Funding Status: Planned PE 50 50 100 Assumes 100%City funded(Fund 311). Planned RW 135 15 150 Length (miles):0 Planned CN 1,715 35 1,750 Total 50 77 1,718 35 1,880 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances. 4/29/2020 Page 13 K-1,,,,,),-,00,\•......._ 2021 - 2026 poaneSix-Year Transportation Improvement Program ValleyDollars in Thousands Funding Project/Description/Current Status/Length Total Sources 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Total 40 South Bowdish Rd. - Phased Corridor Improvements 2,502 City 12 8 460 12 8 500 Other 49 32 1,840 49 32 2,002 Description: Reconstruct Sprague to Dishman Mica as 2-lane section w/curb,sidewalk, bike lanes and new stormwater facilities. Also included are intersection improvements at 32nd Ave and a new signal or roundabout at 16th Ave. Status: Funding Status: Planned PE 200 200 400 Phased improvements to align with available funding opportunities. Planned RW 100 100 200 Potential sources include TIB,SRTC, Local. Length (miles):3 Planned CN 2,300 2,300 Total 61 40 2,300 61 40 2,502 41 Dishman-Mica Rd. Preservation - Schafer to S. City 1,300 City 50 1,250 1,300 Limit Description: Pavement preservation project. Status: Funding Status: Planned PE 50 50 Assumes 100%City funded(Fund 311). Planned RW 0 Length (miles):1 Planned CN 1,250 1,250 Total 50 1,250 1,300 42 MuIlan Rd. Preservation- Broadway to Mission 1,400 City 42 147 189 STBG 267 944 1,211 Description: Preservation project with conduit for future ITS infill,signals improvements at Mission. Status: Funding Status: Planned PE 149 149 Applying for STBG Preservation funds. Planned RW 160 160 Length (miles):0.3 Planned CN 1,091 1,091 Total 309 1,091 1,400 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances. 4/29/2020 Page 14 K-1,,,,,),-,00,\•......._ 2021 - 2026 poaneSix-Year Transportation Improvement Program ValleyDollars in Thousands Funding Project/Description/Current Status/Length Total Sources 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Total 43 Mirabeau Parkway/Mansfield Ave. Intersection 905 City 120 110 230 Improvement cMAQ 100 575 675 Description: Intersection capacity improvements. Status: Funding Status: Partial PE 120 120 Potential for Developer funds via Mirabeau Subarea Traffic Study. Planned RW 100 100 Length (miles): Intersection Planned CN 685 685 Total 120 100 685 905 44 Barker Rd. Improvement Project- 1-90 to Appleway 6,501 City 135 270 473 878 Other 865 1,730 3,028 5,623 Description: Reconstruct 5-lane urban section with alignment/channelization improvements at Appleway&Broadway. Status: Funding Status: Planned PE 1,000 1,000 Anticipated to follow 1-90 interchange improvements. Planned RW 2,000 2,000 Length (miles):0.3 Planned CN 3,500 3,500 Total 1,000 2,000 3,501 6,501 45 Flora Rd. Reconstruction- Euclid to Garland 2,200 City 20 20 400 440 Other 80 80 1,600 1,760 Description: Reconstruct to an urban arterial section in partnership with Spokane County Sewer Extension Status: Funding Status: Planned PE 100 100 Seeking funding,assume 20%City match. Planned RW 100 100 Length (miles):0.6 Planned CN 2,000 2,000 Total 100 100 2,000 2,200 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances. 4/29/2020 Page 15 K-1,,,,,),-,00,\•......._ 2021 - 2026 poaneSix-Year Transportation Improvement Program ValleyDollars in Thousands Funding Project/Description/Current Status/Length Total Sources 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Total 46 Park Rd. Preservation- Sprague to Trent 1,360 City 100 60 1,200 1,360 Description: Pavement preservation project. Status: Funding Status: Planned PE 70 70 Assumes 100%City funded(Fund 311). Planned RW 30 30 Length (miles):0.8 Planned CN 1,200 1,200 Total 100 60 1,200 1,360 47 Vera Crest+ Rocky Ridge Street Reconstruction 150 City 60 60 30 150 Projects Description: Stormwater and road reconstruction projects including multiple neighborhoods: Kahuna Hills(Carnahan/Kahuna/15th), Heather Park(16th at Rocky Ridge, Koren), Ridgemont Estates(Vera Crest,Conklin). Status: Funding Status: Planned PE 60 60 30 150 Multi-year,phased project.PE required to define scope and CN cost. RW 0 Possible CN funding by Ecology. Length (miles):0 CN 0 Total 60 60 30 150 48 Barker Rd. Intersection Improvements at 4th &8th 3,500 City 45 45 72 2,988 3,150 DEV 5 5 8 332 350 Description: Provide new traffic signal or roundabout,per S. Barker Corridor Study. Status: Funding Status: Planned PE 50 50 100 Assume City funded, but may be eligible for grant funds. Planned RW 80 20 100 Length (miles):0 Intersection Planned CN 3,300 3,300 Total 50 50 80 3,320 3,500 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances. 4/29/2020 Page 16 K-1,,,,,),-,00,\•......._ 2021 - 2026 poaneSix-Year Transportation Improvement Program ValleyDollars in Thousands Funding Project/Description/Current Status/Length Total Sources 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Total 49 Cataldo Ave. Realignment at Barker Rd. 2,000 City 20 120 100 560 800 DEV 5 30 25 140 200 Description: Other 25 150 125 700 1,000 Realign Cataldo east of Barker to intersect Boone Ave.,per adopted Planned Action Ordinance. Status: Funding Status: Planned PE 50 50 100 Planned project.Assume PAO contributions from Developers in the Planned RW 250 250 500 amount of 10%,City 40%,grants 50%.CN after 2025. Length (miles):0.2 Planned CN 1,400 1,400 Total 50 300 250 1,400 2,000 50 Wellesley Ave. Preservation -Sullivan to Flora 1,000 City 54 946 1,000 Description: Pavement preservation project. Status: Funding Status: Planned PE 54 6 60 2024 PE 2025 CN RW 0 Length (miles):1 Planned CN 940 940 Total 54 946 1,000 51 32nd Ave. Preservation -Pines to SR 27 1,000 City 54 946 1,000 Description: Pavement preservation project. Status: Funding Status: Planned PE 54 6 60 2024 PE,2025 CN RW 0 Length (miles):0.8 Planned CN 940 940 Total 54 946 1,000 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances. 4/29/2020 Page 17 ,--,,,,,,),-.400"\•......._ 2021 - 2026 p4 �arieSix-Year Transportation Improvement Program .1000 Valley Dollars in Thousands Funding Project/Description/Current Status/Length Total Sources 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Total 52 8th Ave. Preservation- Havana to Park 2,000 City 54 106 1,840 2,000 Description: Pavement preservation project with select locations of sidewalk and road widening. Status: Funding Status: Planned PE 54 6 60 2024 PE,2025 ROW,2026 CN Planned RW 100 100 Length (miles):1 Planned CN 1,840 1,840 Total 54 106 1,840 2,000 53 Barker Rd. Improvement-Appleway to S. City Limits 3,500 City 20 36 644 700 TIB 80 144 2,576 2,800 Description: Reconstruct to 3-lane urban section from Appleway to Sprague including signal/channelization improvements at Appleway,and a 2-lane urban section south of Sprague. Status: Funding Status: Planned PE 100 100 200 Identified in S. Barker Corridor Study. Planned RW 80 20 100 Length (miles):0.8 Planned CN 3,200 3,200 Total 100 180 3,220 3,500 54 Flora Rd. / SR 290 Intersection Improvement 150 City 20 20 20 60 DEV 5 5 5 15 Description: Other 25 25 25 75 Provide new signal or roundabout,per adopted Planned Action Ordinance. Assume ROW&CN after 2026. Status: Funding Status: Planned PE 50 50 100 Planned project.Assume PAO contributions from Developers in the Planned RW 50 50 amount of 10%,City 40%,grants 50%. Length (miles):0 Planned CN 0 Total 50 50 50 150 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances. 4/29/2020 Page 18 ,--,,,,,,),-.400"\•......._ 2021 - 2026 p4 �arieSix-Year Transportation Improvement Program WalleyDollars in Thousands Funding Project/Description/Current Status/Length Total Sources 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Total 55 Appleway Trail - University to Dishman Mica 200 City 10 10 20 40 Other 40 40 80 160 Description: Extend Shared Use pathway to Dishman Mica with north connections to City Hall and Balfour Park. Status: Funding Status: Planned PE 50 50 100 Potential funding sources:TIB,SRTC, RCO, LDA,City Planned RW 50 50 Length (miles):1 Planned CN 0 Total 50 50 100 200 56 Argonne Rd. & 1-90 Interchange Bridge Widening 500 City 50 50 100 FMSIB 75 75 150 Description: STBG 100 100 200 Widen Argonne Road bridge to 3 lanes southbound and improve sidewalks. WSDOT 25 25 50 Status: Funding Status: Planned PE 250 250 500 $15 M total assumes bridge reconstruction,rechannelization,adjacent RW 0 signal rework.20%City match,and CN after 2025. Length (miles):0.1 Planned CN 0 Total 250 250 500 57 8th Ave. /Park Rd. Intersection Improvement 340 City 16 52 68 DEV Description: Other 64 208 272 Provide new traffic signal or roundabout. Status: Funding Status: Planned PE 80 20 100 Assume 2025 PE,2026 ROW,2027 CN. Planned RW 240 240 Length (miles):0 Planned CN 0 Total 80 260 340 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances. 4/29/2020 Page 19 K-1,,,,,),-,00,\•......._ 2021 - 2026 poaneSix-Year Transportation Improvement Program ValleyDollars in Thousands Funding Project/Description/Current Status/Length Total Sources 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Total 58 Pines Rd. (SR-27)/16th Ave. Intersection Improvement 250 City 50 75 125 DEV 50 75 125 Description: Other Add traffic control at five-leg intersecton. Status: Funding Status: Planned PE 100 100 200 $5M est.total. Pending funding to improve five-leg intersection. Planned RW 50 50 Length (miles): Intersection Planned CN 0 Total 100 150 250 59 Barker Rd. /Boone Ave. Intersection Improvement 200 City 20 60 80 DEV 5 15 20 Description: Other 25 75 100 Provide new signal or roundabout,per adopted Planned Action Ordinance. Assume ROW&CN after 2025. Status: Funding Status: Planned PE 50 50 100 $2.8 est.total.Assume PAO contributions from Developers in the amount Planned RW 100 100 of 10%, City 40%,grants 50%. Length (miles):0 Planned CN 0 Total 50 150 200 60 Broadway Ave. Improvements-Flora to Barker 600 City 16 104 120 Other 64 416 480 Description: Extend 3-lane urban section to Barker Rd and realign connection east of Barker. Status: Funding Status: Planned PE 80 20 100 Possible partnership with WSDOT. Planned RW 500 500 Length (miles):5E Planned CN 0 Total 80 520 600 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances. 4/29/2020 Page 20 K-1,,,,,),-,00,\•......._ 2021 - 2026 poaneSix-Year Transportation Improvement Program ValleyDollars in Thousands Funding Project/Description/Current Status/Length Total Sources 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Total 61 Barker Rd. -Mission to Interstate 90 700 City 80 200 280 DEV 20 50 70 Description: Other 100 250 350 Reconstruct to 5-lane urban section. Improvements at Boone intersection are identified separately. Status: Funding Status: Planned PE 200 200 Planned project for 2025 PE.Assume PAO contributions from Developers Planned RW 500 500 in the amount of 10%,City 40%,grants 50%. Length (miles):0.3 Planned CN 0 Total 200 500 700 62 4th Ave. /Pines Rd. (SR 27) Intersection Improvements 300 City 100 200 300 Description: Install new intersection control. Status: Funding Status: Planned PE 100 100 Est.$1M total cost.2025 PE,2026 ROW,2027 CN. Planned RW 200 200 Length (miles):0 Planned CN 0 Total 100 200 300 63 Sullivan Rd. / Kiernan Ave. Intersection Improvement 80 City 16 16 Other 64 64 Description: Improve channelization and signal operations at intersection and reconstruct intersection with concrete. Status: Funding Status: Planned PE 80 80 $2M est.total. Planned PE in 2026.Assume 20%City match. Planned RW 0 Length (miles):0 Planned CN 0 Total 80 80 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances. 4/29/2020 Page 21 2021 - 2026 pokane Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program ValleyDollars in Thousands Funding Project/Description/Current Status/Length Total Sources 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Total 64 Sullivan Rd. /Marietta Ave. Intersection Improvement 80 City 16 16 Other 64 64 Description: Improve channelization and signal operations at intersection and reconstruct intersection with concrete. Status: Funding Status: Planned PE 80 80 $2M est.total. Planned PE in 2026.Assume 20%City match. Planned RW 0 Length (miles):0 Planned CN 0 Total 80 80 65 Boone Ave. Reconstruction-Flora to Barker 75 City 75 75 Other Description: Reconstruct corridor to city standards. Status: Funding Status: PE 75 75 Est.$4M total cost.2025 City-funded PE,2026 ROW,2027 CN. RW 0 Length (miles):1 CN 0 Total 75 75 66 Flora Rd. Reconstruction- Sprague to Indiana 75 City 15 15 Other 60 60 Description: Reconstruct to city standards,including a shared-use pathway connecting Appleway&Centennial Trails. Status: Funding Status: PE 75 75 Assume 20%City match. Possible funding from SRTC, RCO,TIB,WA Leg. RW 0 Length (miles):2 CN 0 Total 75 75 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances. 4/29/2020 Page 22 2021 - 2026 pokane Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program ValleyDollars in Thousands Funding Project/Description/Current Status/Length Total Sources 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Total 67 Euclid Ave. Preservation -Barker to E. City Limit 50 City 50 50 Description: Pavement preservation project.City may consider increasing scope of project to improve road section to meet City standards. Status: Funding Status: Planned PE 50 50 2026 PE RW 0 Length (miles):0.5 Planned CN 0 Total 50 50 68 Sullivan Rd. Improvements-Trent to Wellesley 100 City 20 20 Other 80 80 Description: Widen to add center turn lane,improved corridor access management, improved lighting,and addition of shared-use path. Status: Funding Status: PE 100 100 Est.$3M total cost.Scope based on updated to Sullivan Corridor Study. RW 0 Assume 20%City match. Length (miles):0.3 CN 0 Total 100 100 27,983 28,655 22,199 26,253 26,371 40,273 171,734 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances. 4/29/2020 Page 23 1 . Barker Rd . & 1-90 WB a Interchan Spolane' Interchange Valley • Project Type: Intersection Improvement Project Description: Partnership with WSDOT for PE of westbound I-90/Barker interchange roundabout. Funding Status: Secured Project Phase(s): Secured Cost Estimate Estimated Project (in $1,000) Schedule Preliminary Engineering (PE): 900 2019-2020 Right of Way (RW): 0 - Construction (CN): 0 - Total Cost: 900 2. N . Sullivan Rd . ITS Project *wane Valley 1 • I 1 .._ , i Project Type: Traffic Operations & Maintenance Project Description: Extend Intelligent Transportation Systems conduit and controls along Sullivan Corridor. Funding Status: Secured Project Phase(s): Secured Cost Estimate Estimated Project (in $1,000) Schedule Preliminary Engineering (PE): 105 2017-2019 Right of Way (RW): 100 2019 Construction (CN): 709 2020 Total Cost: 914 3. Adams Rd . Sidewalk >Mdley E y4 -.a 1('rr7 r-7, i;---1► r- ,,.r—• .---- Ir.... it' . _ _ � i w rl r-. • i 0- ...t 3 �► .. r - x atop.. A ill- 4 G^ .-- Y r e ``^" ^"` .M z i,,. • 6' _ '- - f M ems. '_ I ` J ill . l•-• '•1 4y ' • lam,` .-,r , , _, iiii. 1V Project Type: Pedestrian/Bicycle Improvement Project Description: New sidewalk and stormwater on the east side from 16th to 22nd. Funding Status: Secured Project Phase(s): Secured Cost Estimate Estimated Project (in $1,000) Schedule Preliminary Engineering (PE): 40 2019 Right of Way (RW): 0 - Construction (CN): 400 2020 Total Cost: 440 4. Conklin Rd . Sidewalk Spokane' Valley Project Type: Pedestrian/Bicycle Improvement Project Description: New sidewalk on the west side from Appleway Trail to Riceland Lane. Funding Status: Secured Project Phase(s): Secured Cost Estimate Estimated Project (in $1,000) Schedule Preliminary Engineering (PE): 26 2019 Right of Way (RW): 0 - Construction (CN): 155 2020 Total Cost: 181 5. 2020 Local Access Streets (Barker Siiiika Valley Rd . Homes) . ,,,ogle l . . • : . . 1- ill' -I ' , • � Slit �'y'�r C'.' ' '.,"... ,7 , lif i.,,li. '- . , il, 1-01 :,„4.,t , s,, „_-,,,...........,; - k IN ._'-- 'r 4'- .. - - PIC I� +Z + • 1. -. . r' Yi Project Type: Street Preservation Project Description: County sewer partnership. City to reimburse County for paving and stormwater costs. Funding Status: Secured Project Phase(s): Secured Cost Estimate Estimated Project (in $1,000) Schedule Preliminary Engineering (PE): 50 2019 Right of Way (RW): 0 - Construction (CN): 1 ,750 2020 Total Cost: 1 ,800 6. Ella Rd . Sidewalk >Milley I , I Ana �. ( Ni4001111 r ---.4, 4 _ ._ ,4040. , , . , .,___, _,T. t fi 11 : Project Type: Pedestrian/Bicycle Improvement Project Description: New sidewalk on the west side from Broadway Ave. to Alki Ave. Funding Status: Secured Project Phase(s): Secured Cost Estimate Estimated Project (in $1,000) Schedule Preliminary Engineering (PE): 43 2019 Right of Way (RW): 0 - Construction (CN): 383 2020 Total Cost: 426 7. Indiana Ave. Preservation - spot Valley Evergreen to Sullivan ) :6 mss` - <+ • _ 110 oio =41 Pr i y • •w P • I ' ' � +rte,..w _ Project Type: Street Preservation Project Description: Street preservation project. Funding Status: Secured Project Phase(s): Secured Cost Estimate Estimated Project (in $1,000) Schedule Preliminary Engineering (PE): 100 2019 Right of Way (RW): 0 - Construction (CN): 1 ,900 2020 Total Cost: 2,000 8. Sullivan Rd . Bridge Deck Spoian' Valley Y Resurfacing ,e 11191 t 111ii'iiii.iii.ii.- i . I I ito.edi I lc I Y is �a�� a Gr.a - 4 Project Type: Bridge Project Description: Resurface existing bridge deck on northbound bridge over UPRR tracks. Funding Status: Secured Project Phase(s): Secured Cost Estimate Estimated Project (in $1,000) Schedule Preliminary Engineering (PE): 68 2019-2020 Right of Way (RW): 0 - Construction (CN): 270 2020 Total Cost: 338 �9. ApplewayTrail - Evergreen to spo Valley Sullivan � IJP It- �! II _ � � - it r ft ti 9 • - w _i fir"----� _ ,- -, q43f0. + Project Type: Pedestrian/Bicycle Improvement Project Description: Construct shared-use pathway along public utility corridor. Funding Status: Secured Project Phase(s): Secured Cost Estimate Estimated Project (in $1,000) Schedule Preliminary Engineering (PE): 145 2019 Right of Way (RW): 0 - Construction (CN): 2,250 2019-2020 Total Cost: 2,395 10. Garland Ave Extension- Flora to spot Valley Barker ----------- Project Type: Arterial Improvement Project Description: Construct 3-lane urban section between Flora and Barker. Funding Status: Secured Project Phase(s): Secured Cost Estimate Estimated Project (in $1,000) Schedule Preliminary Engineering (PE): 0 - Right of Way (RW): 0 - Construction (CN): 3,000 2019-2020 Total Cost: 3,000 11 . Pines Rd . / Mission Ave. spot' Valley Intersection Improvement r -1 . si. F rsr :FN F_ 1 171i . _ i ir _ 1 ri"? '''' ' 1 ''''"? IA" k _ .r._ .2i-- lop. Project Type: Intersection Improvement Project Description: Two phases with signal and channelization upgrades (Ph 1) & additional turn lanes on Pines (Ph 2). Funding Status: Secured (Ph 1) Project Phase(s): Secured (Ph 1) Cost Estimate Estimated Project (in $1,000) Schedule Preliminary Engineering (PE): 210 2020 (Ph. 1) Right of Way (RW): 32 - Construction (CN): 1 ,158 2021 (Ph. 1) Total Cost: 1 ,400 12. Citywide Reflective Post Panels Spo ' y Valley (2018) L . I leill" limiiiiiil 1. *._ _ -. K mt } rll 4 4� f 3 _ ►lla , - 1T 1 .: I w . _,. I� !. I I .. l _ 5 i ,.. r, _ -- ,. .. _ , _ . = ..., . i ii 1,-1- .1. . 1 N Project Type: Safety Project Description: Installation of reflective post panels to stop signs and speed limit signs on select streets. Funding Status: Secured Project Phase(s): Secured Cost Estimate Estimated Project (in $1,000) Schedule Preliminary Engineering (PE): 6 2019 Right of Way (RW): 0 - Construction (CN): 72 2020 Total Cost: 78 13. Citywide Reflective Signal spol�ane� y g Valley Backplates (2018) L - iF a . Ir.,: „. , 7,„„ *._ _ -. 4 4t f IlitiAL. 4- I Fi 4 . 4 a _ • ►l , ,.. ..,. I !. I I 1 _ l _, . 5 =, , . __ . _ _. . .. _ , _ , . a 2 Q7., I 4 . p,�'.. .1 .. 1 Project Type: Safety Project Description: Installation of reflective backplate panels at select traffic signals. Funding Status: Secured Project Phase(s): Secured Cost Estimate Estimated Project (in $1,000) Schedule Preliminary Engineering (PE): 15 2019 Right of Way (RW): 0 - Construction (CN): 165 2020 Total Cost: 180 14. Park Rd . Sidewalk STo Valley us-gra.A.HEL....... ----74---!:--1— - - - ' • L . � - 17 moat -,z, c ; y 141, It. iii:II 1,.. ' - ., ti - 4 .6T " ,-,-0 ..„. __11 010-1".11011 I11` If � q : iPe4,4t4 Wa- - 1.- - k , e-! l . ; -- 7;ii0 Project Type: Pedestrian/Bicycle Improvement Project Description: New sidewalk on west side from Sharp to Mission with potential marked crossing at Sharp or Cataldo. Funding Status: Secured Project Phase(s): Secured Cost Estimate Estimated Project (in $1,000) Schedule Preliminary Engineering (PE): 50 2020 Right of Way (RW): 0 - Construction (CN): 683 2021 Total Cost: 733 15. Barker Rd . Improvements ts - Sio e' p Valley Spokane River to Euclid 4.. l' F4 , • _ %• ;1a • Project Type: Arterial Improvement Project Description: Reconstruct and widen to 3-lane urban section to east leg of Euclid. Funding Status: Secured Project Phase(s): Secured Cost Estimate Estimated Project (in $1,000) Schedule Preliminary Engineering (PE): 165 2019 Right of Way (RW): 195 2020 Construction (CN): 2,831 2020-2021 Total Cost: 3,191 16. Sullivan Rd . / WellesleyAve.AveSpo ' Valley Y Intersection Improv. Project Type: Intersection Improvement Project Description: Traffic signal and intersection improvement project, partnership with Spokane County. Funding Status: Secured Project Phase(s): Secured Cost Estimate Estimated Project (in $1,000) Schedule Preliminary Engineering (PE): 175 2018-2020 Right of Way (RW): 135 2020 Construction (CN): 1 ,460 2021-2022 Total Cost: 1 ,770 17. Broadway Ave. Preservation - spo ' Valley Havana to Fancher Project Type: Street Preservation Project Description: Pavement preservation, including stormwater improvements as necessary. Funding Status: Secured Project Phase(s): Secured Cost Estimate Estimated Project (in $1,000) Schedule Preliminary Engineering (PE): 100 2019-2020 Right of Way (RW): 0 - Construction (CN): 2,900 2021 Total Cost: 3,000 18. 8th Ave. Preservation - Progress spot' g Valley to Sullivan . �,l' 1 I likk ..' ri S . ,P I � :,... , \ - F- 1 .10'Vik N. IL. 41 . ' II'-: I .,, ' . ,er(P ril IPI" 7 " 91 I 0 .--- ' I J -it& I i 4 ' 1 :0 iisl, 0 . h ' . ' ' , f 7 at "w I r 1 ' r e ,A ezu jpilLopa t .„ - _ . — .. 4 itilL I. fit iiVn P+ . ir err ri : 1". owilit _ , .:- tr tir . , .11 _ 0. f_ iii .t ,w ... P tri W` i --, h. "..#,-- 1# _. Oa" It xilii kik ,..L_ Project Type: Street Preservation Project Description: Street preservation with potential sidewalk extension and partnership with Vera Water & Power. Funding Status: Planned Project Phase(s): Planned Cost Estimate Estimated Project (in $1,000) Schedule Preliminary Engineering (PE): 50 2020 Right of Way (RW): 0 - Construction (CN): 650 2021 Total Cost: 700 19. Park Rd . / Mission Ave. Spo ' Valley Intersection Improvement MLR Project Type: Intersection Improvement Project Description: Improve channelization and signal operations. Funding Status: Planned Project Phase(s): Planned Cost Estimate Estimated Project (in $1,000) Schedule Preliminary Engineering (PE): 100 2020 Right of Way (RW): 60 2021 Construction (CN): 1 ,172 2022 Total Cost: 1 ,332 li�20. ApplewayBlvd . Stormwater spoan Valley Improvements . __ ilik., -. . - . 7 _ If: il i - . , # r i a r 4 ,_. a ,wry"_rd , ' d • itAwa - , n i' t ; r .777 --0.4- .--.,,rs� 'e -010-1•=7.1.' a 1 s.� - _ -.a r.—. e!' {9. t- . - A' r ° —' _&=a =ti �g� Project Type: Stormwater Project Description: Improve stormwater facilities between University and Farr. Funded by Dept. of Ecology. Funding Status: Secured Project Phase(s): Secured Cost Estimate Estimated Project (in $1,000) Schedule Preliminary Engineering (PE): 150 2020 Right of Way (RW): 0 - Construction (CN): 850 2021 Total Cost: 1 ,000 21 . Pedestrian & Bicycle Safetyspo � y Valley Analysis L Iri..,:. „. , *._ _ -. lir } r.11 4 4� f . , 3 _ • ►lIN , I . _,. I� !. I Iwi .. l _ r, . 1,„ .„- _.. ___ ,. _. _ , _ . = ..., . p,�'.. .1. . 1 N Project Type: Safety Project Description: Evaluate vehicle vs. pedestrian/bicycist crashes, as identified in the Local Road Safety Plan. Funding Status: Planned Project Phase(s): Planned Cost Estimate Estimated Project (in $1,000) Schedule Preliminary Engineering (PE): 50 2021-2022 Right of Way (RW): 0 - Construction (CN): 0 - Total Cost: 50 22. Barker Rd . at Union Pacific SIo ' Valley Crossing Project Type: Arterial Improvement Project Description: Recnstruct and widen to 3-lane urban section at UPRR and E. Euclid Ave. Funding Status: Secured Project Phase(s): Secured Cost Estimate Estimated Project (in $1,000) Schedule Preliminary Engineering (PE): 85 2020 Right of Way (RW): 50 2020-2021 Construction (CN): 1 ,299 2021 Total Cost: 1 ,434 23. Sullivan Rd . Preservation - Siolan' Valley Sprague to 8th i q t - - .cam - � - -- ' • I � ; - - t f , . N - cam..- ] .r ! ! • T - t _ r ��, I / ry 'fwtl EE ' . '. r I. fi e..� } � .�aK11 -• I ` . ::'—•;. fY" ! iF f � v f. r~ � f �, l+ a y, NI, .- S '5 L l a 4aa _ F- m J iv�.f'f� a v 0 "' a ■ ' .., :fir" , b - - y p.t.' ,, : -- .f it ,--' - -i- .. !" N 1 I.? - Project Type: Street Preservation Project Description: Pavement preservation with signal, sidewalks and stormwater improvements as necessary. Funding Status: Planned Project Phase(s): Planned Cost Estimate Estimated Project (in $1,000) Schedule Preliminary Engineering (PE): 100 2021 Right of Way (RW): 0 - Construction (CN): 1 ,300 2022 Total Cost: 1 ,400 24. Sullivan Rd . Preservation - 8th to Sio ' Valley 16th --71- .rIf j 1u F. 1 ;iri I.PIT M z °I Y 414.6.4111171141 fil% a- —e4x .- b 4 r= ,nl /i r- 4 �- ti ,,4 i _ �. P % ,, � . H. f ° !_ A?, " 1 ,_ f— -_, _ r. `,F. 'Y °6 .k"! • ,- ; , r L. L_0.- 1%fir; ‘ `' 9 141 ® - £- `4 r— VI r A-4i 4 _ 1" 'i . 4 M Imo- eA yy _'V r' I T' i g _: _ Ore' - I- -,a Project Type: Street Preservation Project Description: Pavement preservation with signal, sidewalks and stormwater improvements as necessary. Funding Status: Planned Project Phase(s): Planned Cost Estimate Estimated Project (in $1,000) Schedule Preliminary Engineering (PE): 100 2021 Right of Way (RW): 0 - Construction (CN): 1 ,300 2022 Total Cost: 1 ,400 '25. Argonne Rd . Concrete Pave. - S o e Valley Indiana to Montgomery % 7 I I 4 , i:fl 14` J I` F r ,.I $ ' I IF t:.. , s AIM I ice'. i n sa _,. I„i., , ... t, ,i, 1 a �r 1 y t- 1 Fr RR d Project Type: Arterial Improvement Project Description: Reconstruct with concrete and improve signal timing at Montgomery. Funding Status: Secured Project Phase(s): Secured Cost Estimate Estimated Project (in $1,000) Schedule Preliminary Engineering (PE): 125 2020 Right of Way (RW): 40 2020-2021 Construction (CN): 5,000 2021-2022 Total Cost: 5,165 26. Evergreen Rd Preservation - spo e' g Valley Sprague to Mission , n` ► , - iillia . "- ' 1 '" MEM Ail PI boil . iiimmi ..,... - , . _ , ,_ . , o _ . ._ _ . , . . t . _ . _ .ei : _ . ., ,. _ , . _ of -ill P .___ - „ _. _ E.ariii ,; .,_, ,. _ r - ,_ ,.4 t. A r � e Mil r F s' r E W, Iltimi.4 Project Type: Street Preservation Project Description: Pavement preservation project. Funding Status: Planned Project Phase(s): Planned Cost Estimate Estimated Project (in $1,000) Schedule Preliminary Engineering (PE): 100 2021 Right of Way (RW): 0 - Construction (CN): 1 ,900 2022 Total Cost: 2,000 27. Balfour Park Frontage spo � g Valley Improvements Project Type: Street Preservation Project Description: Pavement preservation, widen paved shoulder, install curb and sidewalk on Herald, Main and Balfour. Funding Status: Planned Project Phase(s): Planned Cost Estimate Estimated Project (in $1,000) Schedule Preliminary Engineering (PE): 100 2020 Right of Way (RW): 0 - Construction (CN): 1 ,900 2021 Total Cost: 2,000 28. Sprague Ave. / Barker Rd . spol�ean � Valle Intersection Improvement 111 y _ N Project Type: Intersection Improvement Project Description: Provide new roundabout and with sidewalks and bike accomodations. Funding Status: Partial Project Phase(s): Partial Cost Estimate Estimated Project (in $1,000) Schedule Preliminary Engineering (PE): 165 2020 Right of Way (RW): 270 2021 Construction (CN): 1 ,835 2022 Total Cost: 2,270 29. Sprague Ave. Stormwater *Wane Valle Improvements . -r -_ _, e at S 4 fes.: 7 , - r Project Type: Stormwater Project Description: Drywell retrofits between University and Park. Funded by Dept. of Ecology. Funding Status: Secured Project Phase(s): Secured Cost Estimate Estimated Project (in $1,000) Schedule Preliminary Engineering (PE): 100 2021 Right of Way (RW): 0 - Construction (CN): 1 ,900 2022 Total Cost: 2,000 30. Wilbur Rd . Sidewalk - Boone to *dime Mission 1 =_‘1'I 1 ; ' r_,-; , _ iii. *If ___ _ e jj1.04.41,1ilt_ 1. ", r L . j . - -ar , ` . r Cam( it '1 ..111 - ilk. l , -0-...4i ma * ` -- I ' - . ,., ` � a rkfM;affiii - r� !Y _ . 1 r e't 1� `.._ r- T. , - {4.--1 ', `; ie . — _ -` ` _ , 'mak � " i' —' , .•.irr . I, ii ..._ i Project Type: Pedestrian/Bicycle Improvement Project Description: Install sidewalk from Boone to Mission on one side of road. Funding Status: Secured Project Phase(s): Secured Cost Estimate Estimated Project (in $1,000) Schedule Preliminary Engineering (PE): 60 2021 Right of Way (RW): 20 2021 Construction (CN): 564 2022 Total Cost: 644 31 . Barker Rd . / BNSF Grade Spo ' Valley Separation Project Project Type: Bridge Project Description: Construct Grade Separation at Barker/BNSF RR/Trent (SR290). Funding Status: Secured Project Phase(s): Secured Cost Estimate Estimated Project (in $1,000) Schedule Preliminary Engineering (PE): 2,595 2019 Right of Way (RW): 2,545 2020 Construction (CN): 21 ,030 2020-2023 Total Cost: 26,170 32. Pines Rd . (SR27) / BNSF Grade Spo ' Valley Separation Project Project Type: Bridge Project Description: Construct Grade Separation at Pines/BNSF RR/Trent (SR290). Funding Status: Partial Project Phase(s): Partial Cost Estimate Estimated Project (in $1,000) Schedule Preliminary Engineering (PE): 2,494 2020-2021 Right of Way (RW): 4,700 2020-2022 Construction (CN): 21 ,806 2023-2025 Total Cost: 29,000 33. Sullivan Rd . / SR 290 a Interchang ValleySpokane � Reconstruction a vawrg - • J .01 1.71-7 Project Type: Bridge Project Description: Reconstruct interchange to improve safety and capacity. Funding Status: Planned Project Phase(s): Planned Cost Estimate Estimated Project (in $1,000) Schedule Preliminary Engineering (PE): 2,650 2021-2023 Right of Way (RW): 1 ,380 2024-2025 Construction (CN): 22,600 2026-2028 Total Cost: 26,630 34. Street Preservation Projects - *dime Valley $3M Annually L aisk 1 r. . . 1. finsift ___. __Lit. tiL. „. , ._ _ --.. _ K } '1 4lot 4� f I * ,� _. . , r ri.. 3 _ � ►lla , — 17— .-1= 1 1 i . 1 .: I w - i i -a. 1 �,`I ' 11 r . 1 r, - a 21 , i _ . ..,. r I 1" _ t- ,i . .� N Project Type: Street Preservation Project Description: Preservation projects, typically arterials or collectors, or used as matching funds for grants. Funding Status: Planned Project Phase(s): Planned Cost Estimate Estimated Project (in $1,000) Schedule Preliminary Engineering (PE): 500 Annually Right of Way (RW): 0 Annually Construction (CN): 17,500 Annually Total Cost: 18,000 35. Local Access Street spot' Valley Improvements - $ 1 .5M Annually L ais Iri..,:. . . 1. finsibi ___. .....6.= ‘,. „. , .. 4*._ _ -. . . lot } r.l1 4 4� f __, , ,N "' --+A '1In - 3 _ � ►l 17- •-i 1 : w k I , 1 I 1 r !. I I . I . _,. _ 5 __. 1 % .„- _ -_ _. .. _ . _. 4,. .0., :::')r I I . .. 11,,`I i,1011# '..p, ' , ' N Project Type: Street Preservation Project Description: Funded by Street Wear Fee. Project type varies (surface treatments, grind/inlays, reconstruction). Funding Status: Planned Project Phase(s): Planned Cost Estimate Estimated Project (in $1,000) Schedule Preliminary Engineering (PE): 600 Annually Right of Way (RW): 0 Annually Construction (CN): 8,400 Annually Total Cost: 9,000 36. Citywide SafetyProjects - *dime Valle Biennial L - _ _ ais Ir. .. „. , *._ _ -. 4 4t f I * - -- A ' r ri.. libAIL,. i q •17-1 i . I • I w ie 1 , . _Jlt - ill r . 11 = _ , 5 -- , ' Project Type: Safety Project Description: Projects are consistent with the City's Local Road Safety Plan. Awarded projects specified in TIP. Funding Status: Planned Project Phase(s): Planned Cost Estimate Estimated Project (in $1,000) Schedule Preliminary Engineering (PE): 100 Annually Right of Way (RW): 0 Annually Construction (CN): 1 ,700 Annually Total Cost: 1 ,800 37. Sullivan Rd Preservation - 16th *Wane Ave. to City Limit A „ti roof A, Ill , : 4.4_,iirif Project Type: Street Preservation Project Description: Pavement preservation with signal, sidewalks and stormwater improvements as necessary. Funding Status: Planned Project Phase(s): Planned Cost Estimate Estimated Project (in $1,000) Schedule Preliminary Engineering (PE): 100 2022 Right of Way (RW): 0 Construction (CN): 2,100 2023 Total Cost: 2,200 38. 8th Ave. / Carnahan Rd . SIo ' Valley Intersection Improvement 1 t. s. -L,_ ii .., ...Ls!: 1,71, r. i--,. a Project Type: Intersection Improvement Project Description: Add intersection control (turn lanes, potential signal). Funding Status: Planned Project Phase(s): Planned Cost Estimate Estimated Project (in $1,000) Schedule Preliminary Engineering (PE): 175 2022 Right of Way (RW): 250 2023 Construction (CN): 1 ,575 2024 Total Cost: 2,000 39. Mission Ave. Preservation - SIo e' Valley Mullan to University liguaammotiongsa z I - 1 f - 0 . - J 1' H. .1,4 • 7- . r. , , ilk i y` tall ' ,.. • . 1 ' .t4X + s1 �T r _ F ., . .1 ,' Project Type: Street Preservation Project Description: Pavement preservation and possible widening project with stormwater improvements as necessary. Funding Status: Planned Project Phase(s): Planned Cost Estimate Estimated Project (in $1,000) Schedule Preliminary Engineering (PE): 100 2022 Right of Way (RW): 150 2023 Construction (CN): 1 ,750 2024 Total Cost: 2,000 40. South Bowdish Rd . - Phased Spot' Valley Corridor Improvements �.-. ':"Cgira 1 :11 111 1 4eires Amu. - l "man= Ill ,) r � N Project Type: Arterial Improvement Project Description: Reconstruct Sprague to Dishman Mica as a modified urban street with improvements at 16th/32nd. Funding Status: Planned Project Phase(s): Planned Cost Estimate Estimated Project (in $1,000) Schedule Preliminary Engineering (PE): 1,000 2022 Right of Way (RW): 500 2023 Construction (CN): 11 ,500 2024 Total Cost: 13,000 41 . Dishman-Mica Rd . Pres. - Schafer spo e' 4,.....0 valley to S. City Limit ,, ,. I ' . rill! - 7 l: ' 4111 to Igo . e c s` � Ali • , .; .,-. , •• ...;1 "R.- _ . . ,.. i , , y'1� , . _ f 1 I Y ' Fp 'f a I _Jy� ` .ice 1 •'4' r N� ^ •_ 12 ` , 4: . SER,►,_ Project Type: Street Preservation Project Description: Pavement preservation project. Funding Status: Planned Project Phase(s): Planned Cost Estimate Estimated Project (in $1,000) Schedule Preliminary Engineering (PE): 50 2023 Right of Way (RW): 0 - Construction (CN): 1 ,250 2024 Total Cost: 1 ,300 42. MuIlan Rd . Preservation - S o1an' Valley Broadway to Mission ,� � _ _ _ _ ,7 r , A ;II I -'' i LI -- ' .. _. .., . ; . . . . ,-. Fm, ,. . - .4. ,- Me y * G3 s:.: I I y - - rt 1V Project Type: Street Preservation Project Description: Preservation project with conduit for future ITS infill, signals improvements at Mission. Funding Status: Planned Project Phase(s): Planned Cost Estimate Estimated Project (in $1,000) Schedule Preliminary Engineering (PE): 149 2023 Right of Way (RW): 160 2023 Construction (CN): 1 ,091 2024 Total Cost: 1 ,400 43. Mirabeau / Mansfield Intersection *Wane Improvements 47 F F T CS. ."II- :'' " p.. _ lit.Project Type: Intersection Improvement Project Description: Intersection capacity improvements. Funding Status: Planned Project Phase(s): Planned Cost Estimate Estimated Project (in $1,000) Schedule Preliminary Engineering (PE): 120 2023 Right of Way (RW): 100 2024 Construction (CN): 685 2025 Total Cost: 905 '44. Barker Rd . Improvements - Sio e Valley Appleway to 1-90 �"" `� r I 1 '. T IN, fj�: � , ?`*z; � �'rvii-g,i vti. k,y-. No • r. T 1- ,. r { , '- +; rt.,-. 3+,1 1. + $.'C.P'.,y- ,`s alt, _ I 4N.• alp`-`- � }- ,. 'C e$1r; 1, -, , Yr wil*,tir 161=44 ..r-1--i--rc.7. -'• . I AjI rwVA{ '�1j t,,,r. 11S r+ 1 r : '' - , 'kr pu eye. r', r l. 1° 9 � . ..- Iit is ..� k•_-- Yom. .6.7--'. L :. „� i I Eta i :' 6 - F' ,2„� :�. 0 I. .. _ -1k * J F.e�_ Project Type: Arterial Improvement Project Description: Reconstruct 5-lane urban section with alignment/channelization improvements at Appleway & Broadway. Funding Status: Planned Project Phase(s): Planned Cost Estimate Estimated Project (in $1,000) Schedule Preliminary Engineering (PE): 1,000 2023 Right of Way (RW): 2,000 2024 Construction (CN): 3,500 2025 Total Cost: 6,500 45. Flora Rd . Reconstruction - Euclid spot' Valley to Garland y f Lc Marra t ti Project Type: Arterial Improvement Project Description: Reconstruct to an urban arterial section in partnership with Spokane County Sewer Extension Funding Status: Planned Project Phase(s): Planned Cost Estimate Estimated Project (in $1,000) Schedule Preliminary Engineering (PE): 100 2023 Right of Way (RW): 100 2024 Construction (CN): 2,000 2025 Total Cost: 2,200 \.......46. Park Rd . Preservation - Sprague spkan Valle to Trent a ! _ :I1; , imisiniiiimmi It ire 1 _ ,, . — ,. _ 1, lit.00--„)-___–„,400----., :-.. 1 _ , , --,..... - liVIME .,.... s .." * 0 •1 , i — t Iit t – i � U 3 I I 1111. 1 . N . MIN ISM FIN - ... e 11121 L .7: - F ' - pc : iirm;1,rY 11.11.11.11 ,ry ®. J 11W I lei • � e I ° In it n .�a ie -_i.L!_P Project Type: Street Preservation Project Description: Pavement preservation project with potential sidewalks at select locations. Funding Status: Planned Project Phase(s): Planned Cost Estimate Estimated Project (in $1,000) Schedule Preliminary Engineering (PE): 70 2023 Right of Way (RW): 30 2024 Construction (CN): 1 ,200 2025 Total Cost: 1 ,300 47. Vera Crest + RockyRidge Street spo � Valle Reconstruction ,w u== -iri°tramI 5 rr. rri�iw�e -- Nip�rr-ri111f■au11r7 ■ate �— [2.1. �am MAII■=■!m 11 s=raE RNIIIII ti r d II II11 il -a. ii- -. Mg M74-5,1-154iii HiniffilSEM"filriglIZEW.w Wit"' Le LI 4 -1..14%) • 1 1 HL ,�1 ♦ 1'.-h i I % '=EF 1 * �1 I -., ci.a: ,917. 1 yram craft', r----- 4,1 1 r i saw, -'• 1 I 1 1 -1 Project Type: Street Reconstruction Project Project Description: Stormwater/road reconstruction in mulltiple areas: Kahuna Hills, Heather Park, Ridgemont Estates. Funding Status: Planned Project Phase(s): Planned Cost Estimate Estimated Project (in $1,000) Schedule Preliminary Engineering (PE): 150 2023-2025 Right of Way (RW): 0 - Construction (CN): 0 - Total Cost: 150 48. Barker Rd . Intersection Sio e' Valley Improvements at 4th & 8th z Y r 1 AL i .� , it it 4 i _ f� I Vl it 1014.11 _ ¢� y 55�y, �`" . IraIP yip .a o . I , •F 1 IL r .. 1�, Imo... rt r # `3 _.a: .fir 5 y • —^ s. e _ j 1 1 /a h - +' . /b 1 1T - tri-, . .2,-„Air 16 ,, *--021.,1 r".. , 1,.. I _ 1 Project Type: Intersection Improvement Project Description: Provide new traffic signal or roundabout, per S. Barker Corridor Study. Funding Status: Planned Project Phase(s): Planned Cost Estimate Estimated Project (in $1,000) Schedule Preliminary Engineering (PE): 100 2023-2024 Right of Way (RW): 100 2025 Construction (CN): 3,300 2026 Total Cost: 3,500 '49. Cataldo Ave. Realignment at S o Valley Barker Rd . r v , .. ... 0 ow_ IF 1116"‘: ,priA ler ,_, * , F. Project Type: Intersection Improvement Project Description: Realign Cataldo Ave east of Barker to Intersect Boone Ave., per adopted Planned Action Ordinance. Funding Status: Planned Project Phase(s): Planned Cost Estimate Estimated Project (in $1,000) Schedule Preliminary Engineering (PE): 100 2023-2024 Right of Way (RW): 500 2024-2025 Construction (CN): 1 ,400 2026 Total Cost: 2,000 50. WellesleyAve. Preservation - spo ' Valley Sullivan to Flora ,. s .c._ = r d 1 ■ r —F _ 4 • #T t-� r� 7 I' — ".!- — + Project Type: Street Preservation Project Description: Pavement preservation project. Funding Status: Planned Project Phase(s): Planned Cost Estimate Estimated Project (in $1,000) Schedule Preliminary Engineering (PE): 60 2024 Right of Way (RW): 0 - Construction (CN): 940 2025 Total Cost: 1 ,000 51 . 32nd Ave. Preservation - Pines to Sio e' Valley SR 27 e. • Ala.io 1 1`"._wp t 1 x oi ir., ._ -,,j, -.. . , ,, , ... , , _., _ ,.. .,4_. ii, ..,. . _.:. ..._ y Fit-, r+..-.` r .. - _ _c _ 1 I set's Fes" it �- ,� _. %.� . t-. e ` _. r .- ,, Plumb •• �._ I` . mss. . 1�� - `,} . _ ., a d t.' 4 ,. or P\--.°,1% --. fi . �,, -- - ... t,.- �t� T . _ e %,_ ..'^ - - __ _ . — a -. .. �. .,� N Project Type: Street Preservation Project Description: Pavement preservation project. Funding Status: Planned Project Phase(s): Planned Cost Estimate Estimated Project (in $1,000) Schedule Preliminary Engineering (PE): 60 2024 Right of Way (RW): 0 - Construction (CN): 940 2025 Total Cost: 1 ,000 52. 8th Ave. Preservation - Havana to Spolane' Valley Park 1111111MerthigiliPM 1_,„Aimiczr ,ir_I it ir,. _.,,,i,.ifkoimitimiima.itericaiima t - - - 4 rw - IIS®�, a II „wino= AI . Plimirip- mit - V 1 ti _ L- 1 1 i i 1 1 Project Type: Arterial Improvement Project Description: Pavement preservation project with select locations of sidewalk and road widening. Funding Status: Planned Project Phase(s): Planned Cost Estimate Estimated Project (in $1,000) Schedule Preliminary Engineering (PE): 60 2024 Right of Way (RW): 100 2025 Construction (CN): 1 ,840 2026 Total Cost: 2,000 53. Barker Rd . Improvement t - spoe� p Valley Appleway to S. City Limit , 1 • - • 1 f 1 I 1 • r 1 Project Type: Arterial Improvement Project Description: Reconstruct 3-lane urban section from Appleway to Sprague and 2-lane urban section south of Sprague. Funding Status: Planned Project Phase(s): Planned Cost Estimate Estimated Project (in $1,000) Schedule Preliminary Engineering (PE): 200 2024 Right of Way (RW): 100 2025 Construction (CN): 3,200 2026 Total Cost: 3,500 54. Flora Rd . / SR 290 Intersection Sol ' Valley Improvement . • Project Type: Intersection Improvement Project Description: Provide new signal or roundabout, per adopted Planned Action Ordinance. Assume ROW & CN after 2026. Funding Status: Planned Project Phase(s): Planned Cost Estimate Estimated Project (in $1,000) Schedule Preliminary Engineering (PE): 100 2024-2025 Right of Way (RW): 100 2026-2027 Construction (CN): 3,800 2028 Total Cost: 4,000 e�55. ApplewayTrail - Universityto Sio Valley Dishman Mica $_ ins P. _ milltsi t } .. i _ Project Type: Pedestrian/Bicycle Improvement Project Description: Extend Shared Use pathway to Dishman Mica with north connections to City Hall and Balfour Park. Funding Status: Planned Project Phase(s): Planned Cost Estimate Estimated Project (in $1,000) Schedule Preliminary Engineering (PE): 100 2024-2025 Right of Way (RW): 100 2026-2027 Construction (CN): 1 ,800 2028 Total Cost: 2,000 56. Argonne Rd . & 1-90 Interchange spoane Valle Bridge Widening Project Type: Bridge Project Description: Widen Argonne Road bridge to 3 lanes southbound and improve sidewalks. Funding Status: Planned Project Phase(s): Planned Cost Estimate Estimated Project (in $1,000) Schedule Preliminary Engineering (PE): 500 2025-2026 Right of Way (RW): 0 - Construction (CN): 14,500 2027-2028 Total Cost: 15,000 57. 8th Ave. / Park Rd . Intersection Spolan' Valley Improvement I. I I - --. A - 7 . .'l 0,41rril"' Project Type: Intersection Improvement Project Description: Provide new traffic signal or roundabout. Funding Status: Planned Project Phase(s): Planned Cost Estimate Estimated Project (in $1,000) Schedule Preliminary Engineering (PE): 100 2025 Right of Way (RW): 300 2026 Construction (CN): 2,600 2027 Total Cost: 3,000 58. Pines Rd (SR-27) / 16th SI o e' Valley Intersection Improvement ai I*IL ++r _ F� .. •... - .4414 Project Type: Intersection Improvement Project Description: Add traffic control at five-leg intersecton. Funding Status: Partial Project Phase(s): Partial Cost Estimate Estimated Project (in $1,000) Schedule Preliminary Engineering (PE): 200 2025-2026 Right of Way (RW): 100 2026-2027 Construction (CN): 4,700 2028 Total Cost: 5,000 59. Barker Rd . / Boone Ave. spot' Valley Intersection Improvement fl�l Y f-Y S 3 - ' .4411,a--mitiftwoihrimviriaglikaddigilre, r e Millii.ffeMkrin. 3., I .0 w. .4f: ,._ Project Type: Intersection Improvement Project Description: Provide new signal or roundabout, per adopted Planned Action Ordinance. Assume ROW & CN after 2025. Funding Status: Planned Project Phase(s): Planned Cost Estimate Estimated Project (in $1,000) Schedule Preliminary Engineering (PE): 100 2025-2026 Right of Way (RW): 200 2026-2027 Construction (CN): 2,500 2028 Total Cost: 2,800 e�60. BroadwayAve. Improvements - spokan Valley Flora to Barker - - �- � - - _ - - - - - � _ � _ ti .r �. .__ ;. - pj. .;,�•°" , r - t` � . 1 - F,R.f .i _ 1!_I, 1% r-. rpp T., f.- • . ._ '. fi' �"AIw. --pi.... .. '' -i [ 11 1 y�. r' ,.-44;:t1,,.' 4f-} ¢. R _ ',1' 4 ,fig y� - :x • ! 'r •,s is '�.. •� � + ' b. - � .. � '' .'N- 4- .1 °W. a ..ee F e - .L- S pp T Y 'k„,_ - .- 't" It • _r- Pik .r.n,,.'4 • _ ' ,'i i.4' -' _, `- .. + r I T edp r Y h N j'. _ Project Type: Arterial Improvement Project Description: Extend 3-lane urban section to Barker Rd and realign connection east of Barker. Funding Status: Planned Project Phase(s): Planned Cost Estimate Estimated Project (in $1,000) Schedule Preliminary Engineering (PE): 100 2025 Right of Way (RW): 500 2026 Construction (CN): 4,400 2027 Total Cost: 5,000 61 . Barker Rd . - Mission to Interstate spot' Valley 90 .. ! far i _ 1 - �7 . -.r i , �1F5w r ^o ' , ;` I . - " ,� F,} �y' . s A * , AT- F 1r. r ,y..''r0.-._.-rte 9 a I r`r •r5* s eta 6 ` N M ' _ .''" .�,--;, e I ! — f . % L ' 1 f m i..'p : ara i -.•. te ._, 4.- J tLli - 41r—p 'r % I � I _ .® r i. ....zfi lif#,Jr ex .._......41 A . ,_ I < i- g -, IIII .1•., a_.••• .. .- . iliVb ia•-•-rfia) -I, - am...e - g:711,47:114, �° `"' �,1 .: r �jam` ' :� - r- —: r -. ' r s ,. . I _ 1 1 1 r. Iv t , r , 6-- r r , .. . Project Type: Arterial Improvement Project Description: Reconstruct to 5-lane urban section. Improvements at Boone intersection are identified separately. Funding Status: Planned Project Phase(s): Planned Cost Estimate Estimated Project (in $1,000) Schedule Preliminary Engineering (PE): 200 2025 Right of Way (RW): 500 2026 Construction (CN): 2,300 2027 Total Cost: 3,000 62. 4th Ave. / Pines Rd . (SR 27) S o1an' Valley Intersection Improv. Mr Irwin' milk it t - T -Wit - -: _ 1.4, - -41 riggill .t1 r 1 r" trill ' 7 Ir.-JO-% r......._. . , ' . 5,..,, t 1 1,. v 1 -4 1° CKin -ilk r A, r-r-k-1 ifr ,f Project Type: Intersection Improvement Project Description: Install new intersection control. Price assumes new signal and channelization. Funding Status: Planned Project Phase(s): Planned Cost Estimate Estimated Project (in $1,000) Schedule Preliminary Engineering (PE): 100 2025 Right of Way (RW): 200 2026 Construction (CN): 700 2027 Total Cost: 1 ,000 63. Sullivan Rd . / Kiernan Ave. *Wane Valley Intersection Improv. 4[pol/wow_ " ""' "° - LAMMOINIMIR jelirw Project Type: Intersection Improvement Project Description: Improve channelization and signal operations and reconstruct intersection with concrete. Funding Status: Planned Project Phase(s): Planned Cost Estimate Estimated Project (in $1,000) Schedule Preliminary Engineering (PE): 100 2026 Right of Way (RW): 100 2027 Construction (CN): 1 ,800 2028 Total Cost: 2,000 64. Sullivan Rd . / Marietta Ave. spot' Valley Intersection Improv. Z. • I Project Type: Intersection Improvement Project Description: Improve channelization and signal operations and reconstruct intersection with concrete. Funding Status: Planned Project Phase(s): Planned Cost Estimate Estimated Project (in $1,000) Schedule Preliminary Engineering (PE): 100 2026 Right of Way (RW): 100 2027 Construction (CN): 1 ,800 2028 Total Cost: 2,000 65. Boone Ave. Reconstruction - Si o e' Valley Flora to Barker ,.r e N...- — y. r q, , �7' . ,.ra ,` n 4 . to _ , �, ' r t F' I — . i I • _ 1,1 d I 5 06 t4.',— — . —. 777 ` . . —a i B : ° . r r,,,„:,t,..--4 . 4- N. 1,J.., N. I 4 'i d' "' '' —,u .p'- _. ; 71''7,* I k=•°-Ir '----'7,-,-W771,,,'1 - 1 7t i ds- 7k F ` y .XII �� s }°` yA�y lf.'O' d - - . 'N _. Project Type: Street Reconstruction Project Project Description: Reconstruct corridor to city standards. Funding Status: Planned Project Phase(s): Planned Cost Estimate Estimated Project (in $1,000) Schedule Preliminary Engineering (PE): 150 2026-2027 Right of Way (RW): 350 2028-2029 Construction (CN): 3,500 2030 Total Cost: 4,000 66. Flora Rd . Reconstruction - Siiiikane Valley Sprague to Indiana • - - 4.00#16.. - Elko Mkt Project Type: Arterial Improvement Project Description: Reconstruct to city standards, including a shared-use path connecting Appleway & Centennial Trails. Funding Status: Planned Project Phase(s): Planned Cost Estimate Estimated Project (in $1,000) Schedule Preliminary Engineering (PE): 150 2026-2027 Right of Way (RW): 250 2028-2029 Construction (CN): 3,600 2030 Total Cost: 4,000 67. Euclid Ave. Preservation - Barker S o1an' Valley to E. City Limit -- , r U ,, , c 17 — _ . --1 '`. r '. , t P. a ice# „S r, . h . '+' *'t - .1- rd-• �, a B ' '1 _ _ - tiott. ,,,_. 1: , p%VilAirr: '54:t. ri.---47-.°":'' ' - * — iti... - ,1 L Project Type: Street Preservation Project Description: Pavement preservation project. City may elect to improve road section to meet City standards. Funding Status: Planned Project Phase(s): Planned Cost Estimate Estimated Project (in $1,000) Schedule Preliminary Engineering (PE): 50 2026 Right of Way (RW): 0 - Construction (CN): 450 2027 Total Cost: 500 '68. Sullivan Rd . Improvements - So e Valley Trent to Wellesley 9 r M �— i a M % t 1- -- ,. ` +mom, . V. , , b -4 7 I .4 re_.... _ , .. .... . - II i- .�.' .�. r j -- iY P — _ , ft FMS � - r' N Project Type: Arterial Improvement Project Description: Widen for center turn lane, improved access management, lighting, and addition of shared-use path. Funding Status: Planned Project Phase(s): Planned Cost Estimate Estimated Project (in $1,000) Schedule Preliminary Engineering (PE): 200 2026-2027 Right of Way (RW): 300 2027-2028 Construction (CN): 2,500 2029 Total Cost: 3,000 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: May 26, 2020 Department Director Approval: El Check all that apply: I.1 consent [' old business ❑new business ❑ public hearing AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Approval of the Following Vouchers: VOUCHER LIST VOUCHER NUMBERS TOTAL AMOUNT 05-11-2020 50669-50707 $651,794.18 05-11-2020 7125; 7127; 7131; 7139-7142; 7144-7145; 7152-7153 $374,269.10 05-12-2020 50708-50720 $28,843.06 05-13-2020 8730-8734 $3,562.00 05-15-2020 50721-50742 $189,277.93 05-15-2020 7143; 7155-7156; 7159-7160; 7162 $87,624.16 GRAND TOTAL: $1,335,370.43 Explanation of Fund Numbers found on Voucher Lists #001 - General Fund 001.090.000.560. General Gov't-Social Services 001.011.000.511. City Council 001.090.000.594 General Gov't-Capital Outlay 001.013.000.513. City Manager 001.013.015.515. Legal Other Funds: 001.016.000. Public Safety 101 —Street Fund 001.018.013.513. Deputy City Manager 103 —Paths &Trails 001.018.014.514. Finance 105—Hotel/Motel Tax 001.018.016.518. Human Resources 106—Solid Waste 001.040.041. Engineering 120—CenterPlace Operating Reserve 001.040.042. Economic Development 121 —Service Level Stabilization Reserve 001.040.043. Building 122—Winter Weather Reserve 001.076.000.576. Parks &Rec—Administration 204—Debt Service 001.076.300.576. Parks &Rec-Maintenance 301 —REET 1 Capital Projects 001.076.301.571. Parks &Rec-Recreation 302—REET 2 Capital Projects 001.076.302.576. Parks &Rec-Aquatics 303 —Street Capital Projects 001.076.304.575. Parks & Rec- Senior Center 309—Parks Capital Grants 001.076.305.571. Parks & Rec-CenterPlace 310—Civic Bldg. Capital Projects 001.090.000.511. General Gov't- Council related 311 —Pavement Preservation 001.090.000.514. General Gov't-Finance related 312—Capital Reserve 001.090.000.517. General Gov't-Employee supply 314—Railroad Grade Separation Projects 001.090.000.518. General Gov't- Centralized Serv. 402—Stormwater Management 001.090.000.519. General Gov't-Other Services 403 —Aquifer Protection Area 001.090.000.540. General Gov't-Transportation 501 —Equipment Rental &Replacement 001.090.000.550. General Gov't-Natural&Eco. 502—Risk Management 001.090.000.595. General Gov't-Pavement Preser. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to approve attached list of claim vouchers. [Approved as part of the Consent Agenda, or may be removed and discussed separately.] STAFF CONTACT: Chelsie Taylor, Finance Director ATTACHMENTS: Voucher Lists vchlist Voucher List Page: 1 05111/2020 8:55:49AM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 50669 5/11/2020 000683 DAVID EVANS&ASSOCIATES 460305 303.000.300.595 _ 0300-TRAFFIC ENGINEERING 3,751.91 461974 303.000.300.595 0300-TRAFFIC ENGINEERING 17,329.73 465251 303.000.300.595 0300-TRAFFIC ENGINEERING 2,146.85 Total: 23,228.49 50670 5/11/2020 003274 EXCHANGE PUBLISHING LLC 565672 309.000.315.594 ADVERTISING 62.41 Total: 62.41 50671 5/11/2020 004628 NORTHWEST ROOF CONSULTANTS INC 5692 309.000.305.594 CONSULTING 960.00 Total: 960.00 50672 5/11/2020 000365 DEPT OF LICENSING MAINT TRAILER 001.033.000.518 LICENSE FOR CARRY-ON TRAILER 54.75 Total: 54.75 50673 5/11/2020 000652 OFFICE DEPOT INC. 477495757001 001.018.014.514 OFFICE SUPPLIES:FINANCE 49.50 Total: 49.50 50674 5/11/2020 000001 SPOKANE CO TREASURER 51505311 001.016.000.523 MARCH 2020 INMATE HOUSING 116,961.21 51505338 001.016.000.523 APRIL 2020 INMATE HOUSING 116,961.21 Total: 233,922.42 50675 5/11/2020 000202 SRCAA 14673 001.090.000.553 2ND QUARTER 2020 35,102.75 Total: 35,102.75 50676 5/11/2020 007705 CT NORTHWEST KI042014 303.000.285.595 0285-SIGNAL EQUIPMENT 4,775.79 KI042017 303.000.285.595 0285-SIGNAL EQUIPMENT 3,239,31 Total: 8,015.10 50677 5/11/2020 000683 DAVID EVANS&ASSOCIATES 465249 101.042.000.542 TRAFFIC SERVICES 17,534.67 Total: 17,534.67 50678 5/11/2020 000093 SPOKESMAN-REVIEW,THE 0000014072 311.000.285.595 ACCT 42365 ADVERTISING 3,033.81 Total: 3,033.81 50679 5/11/2020 007637 COMMONSTREET CONSULTING LLC CSROW 20051 314.000.223.595 0223-RIGHT-OF-WAY SERVICES 5,845.61 Total: 5,845.61 Page: 1 vchlist Voucher List Page: 2 05/1112020 8:55:49AM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 50680 5/1112020 000683 DAVID EVANS&ASSOCIATES 465263 311.000.285.595 19-129-TRAFFIC ENGINEERING 2,909.53 Total: 2,909.53 50681 5/11/2020 000140 WALT'S MAILING SERVICE LTD 73085 311.000.285.595 POSTAGE SERVICES 1,090.10 Total: 1,090.10 50682 5/11/2020 000158 WELCH COMER&ASSOC. INC 51060001-016 303.000.249.595 0249-DESIGN SERVICES 1,879.96 Total: 1,879.96 50683 5/11/2020 000158 WELCH COMER&ASSOC. INC 51068000-016 101.042.000.542 ENGINEERING SERVICES 1,775.69 Total: 1,775.69 50684 5/11/2020 007156 WIDENER&ASSOCIATES 207110 314.000.223.595 0223-ENVIRONMENTAL AND PERMITTI 1,405.60 Total: 1,405.60 50685 5/11/2020 004231 BELSBY ENGINEERING 55233 311.000.309.595 0309-SURVEY SERVICES 2,640.02 Total: 2,640.02 50686 5/11/2020 006573 NATIONAL NATIVE AMERICAN CONST PAY APP 1 303.000.302.595 302/303-CONSTRUCTION 68,268.99 Total: 68,268.99 50687 5/11/2020 000842 WM WINKLER COMPANY PAY APP 2 309.000.304.594 0304-CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT 192,009.72 Total: 192,009.72 50688 5/11/2020 000508 CONOCOPHILLIPS FLEET 65267483 001.040.043.558 APRIL 2020 FLEET FUEL BILL 838.87 Total: 838.87 50689 5/11/2020 004535 SHRED-IT USA LLC 8129698131 001.090.000.518 DOCUMENT DESTRUCTION 169.95 Total: 169.95 50690 5/11/2020 000065 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 3446418398 001.090.000.519 KITCHEN SUPPLIES 71.10 Total: 71.10 50691 5/11/2020 007136 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES INC 14DT HNMJ-GRCH 101.042.000.542 VEHICLE REPAIR&MAINT.SUPPLIES 250.46 16JG-4JGC-36G1 101.042.000.542 VEHICLE REPAIR&MAINTENANCE SU 178.64 1LNH-Y464-6QRW 101.000.000.542 SMALL TOOLS/MINOR EQUIP 119.32 1LRV-NNH6-4X9Q 101.042.000.542 VEHICLE REPAIR&MAINTENANCE SU 17.09 Page: 2 vchlist Voucher List Page: 3 05111/2020 8:55:49AM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept DescriptionlAccount Amount 50691 5/11/2020 007136 007136 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES INC (Continued) Total: 565.51 50692 5/11/2020 003255 DAY WIRELESS SYSTEMS INV628754 101.042.000.543 TOWER RENTAL 216.57 Total: 216.57 50693 5/11/2020 002157 ELJAY OIL COMPANY 4300653 101.042.000.542 FUEL FOR MAINTENANCE SHOP 667.80 Total: 667.80 50694 5/11/2020 005474 FREIGHTLINER NORTHWEST PC001480532:01 101.000.000.542 VEHICLE REPAIR&MAINTENANCE SU 490.00 PC001480956:01 101.042.000.542 SUPPLIES-MAINTENANCE SHOP 108.90 Total: 598.90 50695 5/11/2020 007825 HERC RENTALS 31427372-001 101.043.000.542 EQUIPMENT RENTAL:SULLIVAN BRID( 203.75 Total: 203.75 50696 5/11/2020 002518 INLAND PACIFIC HOSE&FITTINGS 1044733 101.000.000.542 HYDRAULIC HOSE-233' ROLL 1,996.91 1045186-01 101.000.000.542 VEHICLE REPAIR&MAINTENACE SUP 24.83 1045539 101.000.000.542 VEHICLE REPAIR&MAINTENANCE SU 77.38 1045631 101.000.000.542 VEHICLE REPAIR&MAINT.SUPPLIES 13.33 1045950 101.000.000.542 VEHICLE REPAIR&MAINT.SUPPLIES 8.23 1046116 101.000.000.542 VEHICLE REPAIR&MAINT.SUPPLIES 237.37 Total: 2,358.05 50697 5/11/2020 000979 IRS ENVIRONMENTAL OF WA INC 21797 101.042.000.542 CLEAN-UP 4511 N BARKER 1,669.44 Total: 1,669.44 50698 5/11/2020 002466 KENWORTH SALES COMPANY SPOIN3994411 101.000.000.542 VEHICLE REPAIR&MAINTENANCE SU 142.96 Total: '142.96 50699 5/11/2020 000734 DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION RE-313-ATB00413062 101.042.000.542 REIMBURSE TRAFFIC SVCS 7,635.05 RE-313-ATB00413070 101.000.000.542 REIMBURSE ROADWAY MAINTENANCI 24,256.81 Total: 31,891.86 50700 5/11/2020 003274 EXCHANGE PUBLISHING LLC 564731 106.000.000.537 ADVERTISING 27.65 565168 106.000.000.537 ADVERTISING 26.25 Total: 53.90 50701 5/11/2020 001447 FREE PRESS PUBLISHING INC 50894 106.000.000.537 ADVERTISING 59.20 Page: 3 vchlist Voucher List Page: 4 05/1112020 8:55:49AM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 50701 5/11/2020 001447 001447 FREE PRESS PUBLISHING INC (Continued) Total: 59.20 50702 5/11/2020 000652 OFFICE DEPOT INC. 474034881001 001.040.041.543 OFFICE SUPPLIES: MAINT.SHOP 347.89 479239474001 001.040.041.543 OFFICE SUPPLIES: ENGINEERING/DE1 41.53 479248444001 001.040.041.543 OFFICE SUPPLIES: ENGINEERING/DE1 160.77 Total: 550.19 50703 5/11/2020 000709 SENSKE LAWN&TREE CARE[NC. 9868100 402.402.000.531 895 CONTRACT MAINTENANCE 4,776.11 Total: 4,776.11 50704 5/11/2020 001888 COMCAST 4/1712020-5/1612020 001.076.305.575 INTERNET-CENTERPLACE 406.14 Total: 406.14 50705 5/11/2020 002604 DELL FINANCIAL SERVICES LLC 80401000 001.090.000.548 COMPUTER LEASE:001-8922117-007 139.58 80401001 001.090.000.548 COMPUTER LEASE:001-8922117-008 658.51 80401002 001.090.000.548 COMPUTER LEASE:001-8922117-009 368.09 80401003 001.090.000.548 COMPUTER LEASE:001-8922117-010 187.76 80401004 001.090.000.548 COMPUTER LEASE:001-8922117-011 806.78 80401005 001.090.000.548 COMPUTER LEASE:001-8922117-012 266.18 80403476 001.090.000.548 COMPUTER LEASE:001-8922117-004 1,001.72 Total: 3,428.62 50706 5/11/2020 001885 ZAYO GROUP LLC 2020050003578 001.090.000.518 NETWORK INFRASTRUCTURE 283.80 2020050005522 001.090.000.518 INTERNET 626.70 2020050025710 001.090.000.586 INTERNET SERVICES 248.72 Total: 1,159.22 50707 5/11/2020 007168 ZOOM VIDEO COMMUNICATIONS INC INV15770801 001.090.000.518 ZOOM WEB CONFERENCING SOFTWA 2,176.92 Total: 2,176.92 39 Vouchers for bank code: apbank Bank total: 651,794.18 39 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers: 651,794.18 Page: 4 vchlist Voucher List Page: -#y 05/11/2020 9:10:46AM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept DescriptionlAccount Amount 7125 5/5/2020 000120 AWC Ben93201 001.231.16.00 DENTAL PLAN:PAYMENT 146,220.50 Total: 146,220.50 7127 5/5/2020 000165 DEPT OF RETIREMENT SYSTEMS Ben93203 001.231.15.00 PERS:PAYMENT 125,751.51 Total: 125,751.51 7131 5/5/2020 000699 WA COUNCIL CO/CITY EMPLOYEES Ben93205 001.231.21,00 UNION DUES: PAYMENT 2,777.50 Total: 2,777.50 7139 5/5/2020 000048 VANTAGE TRANSFER AGENTS,401A PLAN Ben93207 001,231.14.00 401A:PAYMENT 37,417.18 Total: 37,417.18 7140 5/5/2020 000682 EFTPS Ben93209 402.231.12.00 FEDERAL TAXES: PAYMENT 36,753.57 Total: 36,753.57 7141 5/5/2020 007303 VANTAGEPOINTTRANSFERAGENTS,457 RO Ben93211 001.231.23.00 457 ROTH OPTION:PAYMENT 1,667.36 Total: 1,667,36 7142 5/5/2020 000145 VANTAGEPOINT TRANSFER AGENTS,457 PLS Ben93213 001.231.18.00 457 DEFERRED COMPENSATION: PAYI 9,278.12 Total: 9,278.12 7144 5/5/2020 000162 VANTAGE TRANSFER AGENTS,401A EXEC PL Ben93215 001.231 14.00 401 EXEC PLAN: PAYMENT 703.31 Total: 703.31 7145 5/5/2020 007657 WA STATE SUPPORT REGISTRY Ben93217 101.231.20.00 DIVISION OF CHILD SUPPORT: PAYMEI 229.00 Total: 229.00 7152 5/5/2020 000120 AWC Ben93222 001.231.16.00 DENTAL PLAN(COUNCIL): PAYMENT 11,389.29 Total: 11,389.29 7153 5/5/2020 000682 EFTPS Ben93224 001.231.11.00 FEDERAL TAXES:PAYMENT 2,081.76 Total: 2,081.76 11 Vouchers for bank code: apbank Bank total: 374,269.10 11 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers: 374,269.10 Page: -r--_ vchlist Voucher List Page: 05/1212020 3:05:33PM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 50708 5/12/2020 000101 CDW G XLN0451 001.040.043.524 OTTERBOX DEFENDER IPAD 82.22 Total: 82.22 50709 5/12/2020 000019 PURFECT LOGOS LLC 53355 001.033.099.518 BRICK COVER SIGNS 898.43 Total: 898.43 50710 5/12/2020 007159 THE HOME DEPOT PRO 547057455 001.033.000.518 SUPPLIES FOR CITY HALL 87.47 54757463 001.033.000.518 SUPPLIES FOR CITY HALL 315.20 Total: 402.67 50711 5/12/2020 007231 WESTERN EXTERMINATOR COMPANY 2880472 001.016.016.521 PEST MGMT SERVICES AT PRECINCT 189.49 2884073 001.033.000.518 PEST MGMT SERVICES AT CITY HALL 161.17 Total: 350.66 50712 5/12/2020 007136 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES INC 1 RHR-VHYF-6Q9W 001.040.042.558 SUPPLIES FOR ECO DEV 98.54 Total: 98.54 50713 5/12/2020 000011 GREATER SPOKANE VALLEY 30531 001.040.042.558 Q1-2020 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 6,250.00 Total: 6,250.00 50714 5/12/2020 000065 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 3446418390 001.090.000.517 SUPPLIES FOR CITY HALLJGEN GOV 347.22 3446418393 001.013.000.513 SUPPLIES FOR OPS/ADMIN 69.97 Total: 417.19 50715 5/12/2020 000603 CONTRACT DESIGN ASSOCIATES INC 46670 001.013.015.515 OFFICE FURNITURE: CHAIR FOR LEG/ 433.81 Total: 433.81 50716 5/12/2020 001253 GORDON THOMAS HONEYWELL April 2020 1042 001.011.000.511 GOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS SERVICES 5,000.00 Total: 5,000.00 50717 5/12/2020 000326 CONSOLIDATED IRRIGATION#19 April 2020 001.076.300.576 UTILITIES:APRIL 2020 PARKS&CP 723.18 Total: 723.18 50718 5/12/2020 000070 INLAND POWER&LIGHT CO April 2020 101,042.000.542 UTILITIES:APRIL 2020 453.18 Total: 453.18 50719 5/12/2020 000388 IRVIN WATER DIST.#6 April 2020 001.076.300,576 UTILITIES: PARKS APRIL 2020 175.00 Page: '.-1--. vchlist Voucher List Page: '2'' 05/1212020 3:05:33PM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 50719 5/12/2020 000388 000388 IRVIN WATER DIST.#6 (Continued) Total: 175.00 50720 5/12/2020 000132 MODERN ELECTRIC WATER CO April 2020 001.076.300.576 UTILITIES:APRIL 2020 PARKS 1,489.50 April 2020 101.042.000.542 UTILITIES:APRIL2020 CPW 12,068.68 Total: 13,558.18 13 Vouchers for bank code: apbank Bank total: 28,843.06 13 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers: 28,843.06 I,the undersigned,do certify under penalty of perjury, that the materials have been furnished,the services rendered,or the labor performed as described herein and that the claim is just,due and en unpaid obligation against the City of Spokane Valley,and that I am authorized to authenticate and certify said claim. Finance Director Date Council member reviewed: Mayor Date Council Member Date Page: �� vchlist Voucher List Page: " 05113/2020 12:20:35PM Spokane Valley Bank code: pk-ref Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 8730 5113/2020 007836 LILJEGREN, DEL PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 CANCELLATION REFUND: MIRABEAU P 159.00 Total: 159.00 8731 5/13/2020 004819 MASTER GARDENER FOUNDATION PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 CANCELLATION REFUND:CENTERPIJ 2,838.00 Total: 2,838.00 8732 5/13/2020 007835 MCMAHON,JENNY PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 CANCELLATION REFUND: MEETING R( 354.00 Total: 354.00 8733 5/13/2020 007837 NEW LIFE NETWORKS REISSUE PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND:ROOM 111 52.00 Total: 52.00 6734 5/13/2020 006706 WESCHE,SHANNON PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 CANCELLATION REFUND:MIRABEAU r 159.00 Total: 159.00 5 Vouchers for bank code: pk-ref Bank total: 3,562.00 5 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers: 3,562.00 Page: "i_____-- vchlist Voucher List Page: 1- 0511312020 11:56:53AM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 50721 5/13/2020 000683 DAVID EVANS&ASSOCIATES 465165 314.000.143.595 0143-DESIGN SERVICES 160,121.16 Total: 160,121.16 50722 5/13/2020 007156 WIDENER&ASSOCIATES 207109 303.000.275.595 0275-ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 1,910.40 Total: 1,910.40 50723 5/13/2020 002203 NAPAAUTO PARTS 0538-980423 101.042.000.542 SMALL TOOLS/MINOR EQUIPMENT 37.92 0538-980486 101.042.000.542 VEHICLE REPAIR&MAINT.SUPPLIES 168.02 0538-981328 001.040.041.558 VEHICLE REPAIR&MAINT.SUPPLIES 75.64 0538-981365 001.040.043.558 VEHICLE REPAIR&MAINT.SUPPLIES 62.08 0538-981564 001.040.041.543 VEHICLE REPAIR&MAINT.SUPPLIES 189.01 0538-982118 101.042.000.542 VEHICLE REPAIR&MAINT.SUPPLIES 114.57 0538-982187 101.000.000.542 VEHICLE REPAIR&MAINT.SUPPLIES 115.22 0538-982546 101.042.000.542 VEHICLE REPAIR&MAINT.SUPPLIES 28.19 058-980422 001.040.041.543 VEHICLE REPAIR&MAINT.SUPPLIES 129.49 1713-195889 101.042.000.542 SMALL TOOLS/MINOR EQUIP. 135.00 Total: 1,055.14 50724 5/13/2020 003090 NORTH 40 OUTFITTERS 095409/3 101.042.000.542 SAFETY EQUIPMENT 62.06 095459/3 101.042.000.542 SMALL TOOLS/MINOR EQUIP. 87.10 095664/3 101.042.000.542 SUPPLIES 16.32 Total: 165.48 50725 5/13/2020 006220 PAPE MACHINERY INC 11979288 101.000.000.542 SIDEWALK SNOW REMOVAL 6.00 Total: 6.00 50726 5/13/2020 005968 PRECISE MRM LLC 200-1025663 101.000.000.542 DATA PLAN 250.00 Total: 250.00 50727 5/13/2020 002520 RWC GROUP 120089N 101.000.000.542 FLOOR PANEL-WELDED INTO SNOW} 1,086.97 Total: 1,086.97 50728 5/13/2020 002531 SIX ROBBLEES INC 5-874623 101.000.000.542 VEHICLE REPAIR&MAINT.SUPPLIES 433.14 Total: 433.14 50729 5/13/2020 006822 SNAP-ON INC ARV/43647502 101.042.000.542 SMALL TOOLS/MINOR EQUIPMENT 842.84 Page: "�-- vchlist Voucher List Page: 4r 05113/2020 11:56:53AM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 50729 5/13/2020 006822 006822 SNAP-ON INC (Continued) Total: 842.84 50730 5/13/2020 001660 TITAN TRUCK EQUIP CO INC 1264037 402A02.000.531 VEHICLE REPAIR&MAINE SUPPLIES 290.23 Total: 290.23 50731 5/13/2020 000571 CODE PUBLISHING COMPANY 66696 001.013.000.513 ELECTRONIC CODE UPDATE 168.18 Total: 168.18 50732 5/13/2020 003274 EXCHANGE PUBLISHING LLC 566886 001.040.043.558 LEGAL PUBLICATION 81.37 566887 001.013.000.513 LEGAL PUBLICATION 30.02 566889 001.040.043.558 LEGAL PUBLICATION 86.11 567437 001.013.000.513 LEGAL PUBLICATION 28.50 567439 001.013.000.513 LEGAL PUBLICATION 25.28 567440 001.040.043.558 LEGAL PUBLICATION 119.02 567441 001.040.043.558 LEGAL PUBLICATION 104.28 567442 001.040.043.558 LEGAL PUBLICATION 10.27 567443 001.040.043.558 LEGAL PUBLICATION 65.57 Total: 550.42 50733 5/13/2020 001447 FREE PRESS PUBLISHING INC 50933 001.040.043.558 LEGAL PUBLICATION 92.65 50934 001.040.043.558 LEGAL PUBLICATION 97.75 Total: 190.40 50734 5/13/2020 000001 SPOKANE CO TREASURER 51505359 101.042.000.542 WORK CREW INVOICE MARCH 2020 3,643.40 Total: 3,643.40 50735 5/13/2020 006846 US LINEN&UNIFORM INC 2519409 101.042.000.543 SUPPLIES: MAINTENANCE SHOP 10.89 2523297 101.042.000.543 SUPPLIES: MAINTENANCE SHOP 10.89 2527182 101.042.000.543 SUPPLIES: MAINTENANCE SHOP 10.89 2530993 101.042.000.543 SUPPLIES: MAINTENANCE SHOP 10.89 2534571 101.042.000.543 SUPPLIES: MAINTENANCE SHOP 10.89 2538037 101.042.000.543 SUPPLIES:MAINTENANCE SHOP 10.89 2541377 101.042.000.543 SUPPLIES: MAINTENANCE SHOP 14.81 2544478 101.042.000.543 SUPPLIES:MAINTENANCE SHOP 14.81 2547531 101.042.000.543 SUPPLIES: MAINTENANCE SHOP 14.81 Total: 109.77 50736 5/13/2020 002501 WHITE BLOCK COMPANY 0272294-IN 402.402.000.531 SUPPLIES:STORMWATER 851.55 Page: —2---- // vchlist Voucher List Page: -3-- 05/13/2020 11:56:53AM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept DescriptionlAccount Amount 50736 5/13/2020 002501 002501 WHITE BLOCK COMPANY (Continued) Total: 851.55 50737 5/13/2020 007710 GRANICUS LLC 122360 001.011.000.511 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES-BROADC. 600.00 123285 001.011.000.511 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES-BROADC. 12,193.07 Total: 12,793.07 50738 5/13/2020 000002 H&H BUSINESS SYSTEMS INC. AR151943 001.011.000.511 COPIER COSTS:WEST WING/COUNCII 136.02 AR151944 001.018.014.514 COPIER COSTS: IT 4.87 AR151945 001.018.016.518 COPIER COSTS: HR 22.73 AR151946 001.013.000.513 COPIER COSTS:OPS/ADMIN 310.48 AR151947 001.013.015.515 COPIER COSTS: LEGAL 109.64 AR151948 001.040.043.558 COPIER COSTS: PERMIT CTR 66.76 AR151949 001.040.041.543 COPIER COSTS:CPW ENGINEERING 329.83 AR151950 001.076.000.576 COPIER COSTS:CENTERPLACE 387.10 Total: 1,367.43 50739 5/13/2020 007157 MASTERGRAPHICS AEC,LLC 1-22407 402.402.000.531 2020 BLUEBEAM REVU EXTREME REN 2,758.44 Total: 2,758.44 50740 5/13/2020 001926 FARR,.SARAH EXPENSES 001.018.014.514 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 156.40 Total: 156.40 50741 5/13/2020 005191 HALEY, PAM EXPENSES 001.011.000.511 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 324.64 Total: 324.64 50742 5/13/2020 002960 WICK,BEN EXPENSES 001.011.000.511 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 202.87 Total: 202.87 22 Vouchers for bank code: apbank Bank total: 189,277.93 22 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers: 189,277.93 Page: 3- %2 vchlist Voucher List Page: ,_,r-- 005/2020 f`05015/2020 3:32:44PM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 7143 5/20/2020 002227 IDAHO TAX COMMISSION Ben93454 001.231.50.03 IDAHO STATE TAX BASE:PAYMENT 1,680.33 Total: 1,680.33 7155 5/20/2020 000048 VANTAGE TRANSFER AGENTS,401A PLAN Ben93456 001.231.14.00 401A:PAYMENT 37,786.36 Total: 37,786.36 7156 5/20/2020 000682 EFTPS Ben93458 001.231.11.00 FEDERAL TAXES:PAYMENT 36,392.06 Total 36,392.06 7159 5/20/2020 007303 VANTAGEPOINTTRANSFERAGENTS,457 RO' Ben93460 001231.23.00 457 ROTH OPTION:PAYMENT 1,697.32 Total: 1,697.32 7160 5/20/2020 000145 VANTAGEPOINTTRANSFERAGENTS,457 PLF Ben93462 106.231.18.00 457 DEFERRED COMPENSATION:PAYI 9,364.78 Total: 9,364.78 7162 5/20/2020 000162 VANTAGE TRANSFER AGENTS,401A EXEC PL Ben93464 001.231.14.00 401 EXEC PLAN:PAYMENT 703.31 Total: 703.31 6 Vouchers for bank code: apbank Bank total: 87,624.16 6 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers: 87,624.16 Page: --1---- CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: May 26, 2020 Department Director Approval : Item: Check all that apply: ® consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Payroll for Pay Period Ending May 15, 2020 GOVERNING LEGISLATION: PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: BACKGROUND: Budget/Financial impacts: Employees Council Total Gross: $ 316,675.00 $ - $ 316,675.00 Benefits: $ 67,965.51 $ - $ 67,965.51 Total payroll $ 384,640.51 $ - $ 384,640.51 RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to Approve above payroll. [Approved as part of the Consent Agenda, or may be removed and discussed separately.] STAFF CONTACT: Raba Nimri DRAFT MINUTES SPOKANE VALLEY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING FORMAL FORMAT Spokane Valley City Hall Spokane Valley,Washington May 12,2020 Mayor Wick called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. The meeting was held remotely via ZOOM meeting. Attendance: Councilmembers Staff Ben Wick,Mayor Mark Calhoun,City Manager Brandi Peetz,Deputy Mayor John Hohman,Deputy City Manager Pam Haley, Councilmember Chelsie Taylor,Finance Director Tim Hattenburg, Councilmember Cary Driskell,City Attorney Rod Higgins, Councilmember Bill Helbig, City engineer Linda Thompson, Councilmember Mike Stone,Parks&Recreation Director Morgan Koudelka, Sr.Administrative Analyst ABSENT: Jenny Nickerson,Building Official Arne Woodard, Councilmember Erik Lamb,Deputy City Attorney Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk ROLL CALL City Clerk Bainbridge called the roll; all Councilmembers were present except Councilmember Woodard. It was moved by Councilmember Haley, seconded and unanimously agreed to excuse Councilmember Woodard from tonight's meeting. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: It was moved by Councilmember Hattenburg, seconded and unanimously agreed to approve the amended agenda. INTRODUCTION OF SPECIAL GUESTS AND PRESENTATIONS n/a MAYOR'S REPORT: Mayor Wick reported that as chair of the Health District Board, he met with that group and said that Dr. Lutz feels comfortable with our community moving to phase 2; said a letter has been drafted which has now been submitted to and unanimously approved by the Board of Health;that the letter will then go to the Board of County Commissioners who will approve it and send it to the Governor's office;he said that letter will include letters of support from the two hospitals in our area,i.e.Multicare and Providence, that state that while we have had cases,there is considerable hospital capacity; he mentioned our levels of testing, isolation, and our plans which adds to our strong case to allow us to move forward into phase 2. Mayor Wick asked if there were any objections from Council in him signing the letter, and no objections were raised. Mayor Wick also mentioned a draft letter giving recognition to all area high school graduates,and he asked whether there were any objections from Council in him signing that letter. No objections were raised. 1. CONSENT AGENDA: Consists of items considered routine which are approved as a group. Any member of Council may ask that an item be removed from the Consent Agenda to be considered separately. Proposed Motion:I move to approve the Consent Agenda. a.Approval of claim vouchers on May 12,2020,Request for Council Action Form Total: $3,108,707.68 b.Approval of Payroll for Pay Period Ending April 30,2020: $530,306.82 c.Approval of Council Meeting Minutes of April 28,2020 Formal Meeting Format d.Approval of Council Meeting Minutes of May 5,2020 Study Session Format It was moved by Deputy Mayor Peetz, seconded and unanimously agreed to approve the Consent Agenda. Regular Formal Council Meeting:05-12-2020 Page 1 of 4 Approved by Council: DRAFT NEW BUSINESS: 2. Resolution 20-008 RCO Grant Applications—Mike Stone It was moved by Deputy Mayor Peetz and seconded to approve Resolution 20-008 authorizing a grant application through the Washington Recreation Conservation Office (RCO)for the Flora Road Property Acquisition.Mr.Stone explained that the proposed resolution is required by the RCO as noted in his Request for Council Action;that we will be requesting$1 million for the Flora Road acquisition;he said we received a waiver of retroactivity from the RCO to allow us to reimburse ourselves if the grant application is successful; that the grant application will be scored and ranked by a RCO team, and that funds must be approved by the State Legislature in their 2021 session. It was noted there were no public comments. Vote by acclamation: in favor: unanimous; opposed: none. Motion carried. 3.Motion Consideration: Data Sharing Agreement with Spokane County Assessor—Jenny Nickerson,Erik Lamb It was moved by Deputy Mayor Peetz and seconded to authorize the City Manager to finalize and execute the Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Spokane Valley and Spokane County for site plan data sharing in substantially the form presented.Building Official Nickerson explained that she and Deputy City Attorney Lamb have been working on this process, which has taken more than a year; and she referenced the information in her Request for Council Action form, adding that the name of the software company is Dude Solutions. It was noted there were no public comments. Vote by acclamation: in favor: unanimous; opposed: none. Motion carried. 4.Motion Consideration: Commute Trip Reduction Five-Year Plan Update—Morgan Koudelka It was moved by Councilmember Hattenburg and seconded to adopt the Commute Trip Reduction Plan update, 2020-2024, Updating the Plan Originally adopted by Ordinance 10-013. Mr. Koudelka briefly explained that this is a planning document required under the State's Clean Air Act; he mentioned this material was discussed at last week's Council meeting,and tonight he is asking Council to adopt the updated five-year plan. It was noted there were no public comments. Vote by acclamation: in favor: unanimous; opposed: none. Motion carried. 5.Motion Consideration: Commute Trip Reduction Interlocal Agreement—Morgan Koudelka It was moved by Councilmember Hattenburg and seconded to authorize the City Manager to finalize and execute the Interlocal Agreement Between Spokane County and the City of Spokane Valley Regarding Commute Trip Reduction Implementation. Mr. Koudelka explained that this interlocal allows the County to administer and oversee the programs for all effective employers in Spokane Valley; that it is a two-year agreement based on the state's bi-annual budget,adding that the County has always performed this service for us. It was noted there were no public comments. Vote by acclamation: in favor: unanimous; opposed: none. Motion carried. 5a.Motion Consideration:Barker Road/BNSF Grade Separation Project,BNSF Overpass Agreement—Bill Helbig It was moved by Deputy Mayor Peetz and seconded to authorize the City Manager to finalize and execute the Overpass Agreement with BNSF. City Engineer Helbig explained that time is of the essence on this agreement; that staff has been working for about a year with Burlington Northern regarding the Barker Road Grade Separation Project; he noted the agreement is an accumulation of temporary and permanent easements and associated exhibits outlying costs, including a $70,000 administrative fee for removal of signal and tracks,which fee he noted is a conservative estimate;that the fee is based on 300 working days of flagging and we will have 220, so the figure will be lower. It was noted there were no public comments. Vote by acclamation: in favor: unanimous; opposed: none. Motion carried. PUBLIC COMMENTS: There were no public comments as it was noted that the one person who had initially signed up,was no longer participating in the ZOOM meeting. Regular Formal Council Meeting:05-12-2020 Page 2 of 4 Approved by Council: DRAFT ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS: 6.Mental Health Crisis Stabilization Facility Update —Ariane Schmidt, Spokane Regional Project Mgr Spokane Regional Project Manager Ariane Schmidt,along with Pioneer Human Services Regional Director Dan Sigler,and Ms.Kirsten Gable, Sapere Consulting with Pioneer Human Services Project Management, gave an update on the Mental Health Crisis Stabilization Facility. Ms. Schmidt mentioned that she has been working with the City of Spokane and Spokane County on the creation of a Mental Health Crisis Stabilization Center to divert qualifying individuals form the jail,provide the opportunity to stabilize their condition, enter them into treatment, and manage their conditions to reduce recidivism, thereby allowing for more productive lives while reducing the demand on emergency responders, the jail, and the overall criminal justice system. Ms. Schmidt started the PowerPoint slide presentation,with Mr. Sigler explaining the actual site plan, the floor plan showing the different areas for such things as medical clearance, stabilization,inpatient beds,and withdrawal management and detox areas;he also noted that this facility is not meant for long-term treatment.Mr.Sigler showed some of the suggested soft decor as well as depictions of the multipurpose area,and the lounge and dining area,noting the openness of the rooms.Councilmember Thompson asked if the men and women would be separated, and Mr. Sigler said not necessarily, although they have the capability of doing so; he said with this design, there will be separate areas to shower and change clothes,and that other accommodations can be made when necessary. Moving to the estimated construction timeline,Ms. Schmidt stated that they are on time and on schedule; that they are currently finalizing the design documents and getting ready to go out to bid the first week in June,with the goal to have the bid and selection done by the end of June, and with construction starting in July. She also noted that the next step after that is to begin the documents tied to the long-term and regional partnership, and verifying that this is a regional ownership,noting the three partners to a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) would include Spokane County, the City of Spokane, and the City of Spokane Valley. As shown on slide 14, she went over the revenues and expenditures as well as the purpose of the MOU, which would cover construction costs not funded by the state or Trueblood capital grants, that it would include a formula for cost sharing, but would not include long-term site maintenance costs as that would be part of the interlocal agreement. She also went over some of the operating figures for the first and second years of operation,as shown on slide 15. There was further discussion about grants, and criteria for using those funds, including how much of those funds would be used toward start-up; mention of the County's motor pool building that was built about 1913 and that nothing much has been done to it,which means the building would have to be brought up to code prior to use;mention of the prior estimated municipality fee of$5.00 compared with the figures shown today of$20.00 and how such a change would affect the left over, unfunded areas. Ms. Schmidt said she can have further discussions about the more realistic fee as we move closer to signing the documents,adding that the numbers have not been verified and are preliminary. Mr. Calhoun asked if the municipality fee would be the same for each participating entity and Ms.Schmidt said the fee would be the same,but perhaps not the percentage of how that fee would be applied. Discussion moved to services,then on to the public and partnership engagement timeline,with the last slide showing the project status report of the three phases of the facility. Councilmember Thompson asked if a person started out in mental health but was later determined they couldn't stay there and had to go to jail, would there be two fees. Ms. Schmidt said they haven't got that far down in the details yet; she said perhaps there could be an overnight fee separate from the booking fee, and that would be something to consider.Mr. Sigler added that the expenditure figures are based on about 95% capacity. There was also discussion about the number of beds, and Ms. Schmidt said the number of 16 is a fixed number. Liability was also mentioned and Mr. Sigler said that they would be primarily liable as the facility provider;with Ms. Schmidt adding that the County would assume the risk as the parent entity; and that the County is double-checking with their risk management on that issue. Regular Formal Council Meeting:05-12-2020 Page 3 of 4 Approved by Council: DRAFT Finally,there was discussion about the make-up of the team in that the grant from Trueblood allowed for one deputy and one mental health worker to vet the concept of the unincorporated areas, and she said that has been very successful;and that the team has been formally analyzed and they are now up to two deputies. Mayor Wick remarked that we had advocated for our own dedicated segment and Mr.Calhoun said he will look to bring in Chief Werner to bring us a future update. Councilmembers concurred. Ms. Schmidt also noted they will be working with our legal department and Mr. Calhoun on drafting the legal agreement to get us all to our individual comfort levels; and to determine how to close the capital gap; where the municipalities fall and where they want that user fee to come in in the long term. City Attorney Driskell said we are always interested in the cost methodology and he asked for a copy of the initial draft interlocal so he could begin his review. Council thanked the presenters for their information. 7.Advance Agenda—Mayor Wick Mayor Wick said as we get ready to move into phase 2 of the stay home, stay healthy, there are many restrictions on restaurants,and he would like staff to look at our Code to see if something could be done to add flexibility for the next phases of opening restaurants and other businesses; and to perhaps look at the use of sidewalks or parking lots and/or tents. Councilmembers agreed and Mr. Calhoun said staff will discuss this in their director's meeting tomorrow and will schedule an administrative report for an upcoming Council meeting. 8. Police Department Quarterly Report The Police Department Quarterly Report was for information only and was no reported or discussed. CITY MANAGER COMMENTS: City Manager Calhoun mentioned there will be no meeting next week but we will be back May 26;he also noted that we were informed by the Association of Washington Cities that Councilmember Haley has been awarded a certificate of municipal leadership,and congratulations were extended to Councilmember Haley. It was moved by Deputy Mayor Peetz, seconded and unanimously agreed to adjourn. The meeting adjourned at 7:32 p.m. ATTEST: Ben Wick,Mayor Christine Bainbridge,City Clerk Regular Formal Council Meeting:05-12-2020 Page 4 of 4 Approved by Council: CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: May 26, 2020 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: [' consent ❑ old business ® new business [' public hearing [' information ❑ admin. report [' pending legislation [' executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Motion Consideration: Bid Award — CenterPlace Roof Replacement project— CIP #0305 GOVERNING LEGISLATION: SVMC 3.35.10— Contract Authority PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: • March 23, 2004— City Council approved the construction of CenterPlace • October 27, 2015 — City Council approved a budget amendment for the 2015 General Fund budget which included $36,000 for recommended CenterPlace roof repairs • June 11, 2019 — City Council Budget Workshop included discussion about CenterPlace roof leaks • November 26, 2019 — City Council consensus to proceed with replacing the CenterPlace roof with standing seam metal roofing material • April 14, 2020 — City Council consensus to proceed with replacing the CenterPlace roof with composition shingles roofing material BACKGROUND: At the budget workshop of 2019, staff discussed the CenterPlace roof issue with City Council. Based upon direction from the Council, staff contracted with Architects West to provide consulting and design services to replace the roof. Staff and the consultant presented re- roofing options along with conceptual pricing for comparison purposes in November of 2019. City Council concurred with the consultant and staffs recommendation to proceed with the standing seam metal roofing material. The consultant completed the plans and specifications and the project was advertised for bid on February 7, 2020. Bids were opened February 21 with a wide range of bids. After careful consideration, staff decided it was in the best interest of the City to reject all bids and re-bid the project. On April 14, 2020, staff presented to City Council a revised roof replacement estimate utilizing asphalt composition shingles, similar to the roof at City Hall. The consultant estimated the roof replacement cost at$675,477.08 with this material.While the life expectancy of the standing seam metal roof is greater than composition shingles (50 plus years vs 30 years), staff recommended changing the roof material selection to composition shingles to stay within the anticipated project budget. City Council provided consensus on this updated recommendation. The construction documents were subsequently updated and the project was rebid. The project was advertised on May 1, and bids were opened on May 15, 2020. Five responsive bids were received. Cano Roofing, Inc., doing business as (dba) Signature Roofing submitted the lowest responsive, responsible bid of $661,550.08 (includes $54,066.08 sales tax) which is $13,927 below the Engineer's Estimate. A copy of the Bid Tabulation is attached. If City Council awards the bid, a budget adjustment will be needed to fund construction as follows: Project Costs Project Budget Preliminary Engineering $ 68,225 City General Fund $ 815,000 Construction Contract $ 661,550 Total Budget $ 815,000 Construction Contingency $ 30,450 Construction Engineering $ 54,775 Total estimated costs $ 815,000 OPTIONS: 1) Move to award the contract to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder, or 2) take other appropriate action. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to award the CenterPlace Roof Replacement Project CIP #0305 to Cano Roofing, Inc., dba Signature Roofing in the amount of$607,484 plus applicable sales tax, and authorize the City Manager to finalize and execute the construction contract. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: A 2020 budget amendment is necessary to construct the project and this would be financed as a nonrecurring General Fund expenditure. The General Fund has reserves that are sufficient to accommodate this expense. STAFF CONTACT: Bill Helbig, City Engineer Mike Stone, Director of Parks & Recreation ATTACHMENTS: Bid Tabulation BID TABULATION it,. CenterPlace Roof Replacement Project CIP No. 0305 40.1001.1FTValkV Engineers Estimate Signature Roofing Icon Corporation All Surface Roofing Spokane Roofing Ameritech Roofing Description Units Qty. Unit Price Total Cost Unit Price Total Cost Unit Price Total Cost Unit Price Total Cost Unit Price Total Cost Unit Price Total Cost Schedule A Roof Replacement L.S. 1 $589,272.80 $589,272.80 $576,484.00 $576,484.00 $578,000.00 $578,000.00 $586,999.00 $586,999.00 $738,500.00 $738,500.00 $1,270,000.00 $1,270,000.00 Minor Change CALC 1 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 Allowance for Permit Fees CALC 1 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 Bid Schedule A Sub-Total $620,272.80 $607,484.00 $609,000.00 $617,999.00 $769,500.00 $1,301,000.00 8.9%Tax $55,204.28 $54,066.08 $54,201.00 $55,001.91 $68,485.50 $115,789.00 Bid Schedule A Total $675,477.08 $661,550.08 $663,201.00 $673,000.91 $837,985.50 $1,416,789.00 Competitive bids were opened on 5/15/20. CHECKLIST I hereby certify to the best of my ability Bid Proposal Checklist x x x x x that this is a true and correct bid Bid Proposal Form x x x x x tabulation for the CenterPlace Roof Addendas Acknowledged x x x x x Replacement Project, CIP#0305. Cert. Wage Pymt. Compliance x x x x x Contractor Info x x x x x or Bid Qualifications x x x x x °" Bid Bond x x x x x Glenn Ritter, PE Reps &Certs x x x x x Senior Engineer/Project Manager 5/18/2020 P:\Public Works\Capital Projects\Street Projects\0305-Centerplace Roof Repair\Bid Information\Bid Tab\0305-CenterPlaceRoof-BidTab CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: May 26, 2020 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: [' consent ❑ old business ® new business [' public hearing [' information ❑ admin. report [' pending legislation [' executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Motion Consideration: Bureau of Justice (BOJ) Coronavirus Emergency Supplemental Funding Grant GOVERNING LEGISLATION: N/A PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: N/A BACKGROUND: The City of Spokane Valley has been allocated $75,065 by the BOJ for the purpose of preventing, preparing for and responding to the coronavirus. City staff have coordinated with the Spokane Valley Police Department (SVPD), the Spokane County Sheriff's Office (SCSO), Spokane County Detention Services, and the Spokane Regional Emergency Operation Center and have identified the following items in which to allocate the resources. Already Incurred SCSO/SVPD OT $24,626 Future SCSO/SVPD OT $32,675 Clorox Sanitation Station $ 4,453 Personal Protective Equipment SCSO $ 9,072 SCSO Sanitation $ 1,330 Jail PPE $ 1,573 Jail Sanitation $ 1,336 Total $75,065 The majority of the funds will be used to support overtime costs of the SVPD and SCSO in conducting extra patrols and property crime emphasis related to COVID-19 business closures as well additional COVID-19 related criminal activity. Additional funds will be used to provide sanitation and personal protective equipment needs of law enforcement and detention services. OPTIONS: Consider whether to authorize staff to submit an application for the BOJ grant for items as listed above or modified. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to Authorize the City Manager or designee to Apply for the Bureau of Justice Coronavirus Grant for those items identified above. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: $75,065 in non-supplanting grant funds, no match required. STAFF CONTACT: Morgan Koudelka, Senior Administrative Analyst ATTACHMENTS: BOJ Solicitation OMB No. 1121-0329 Approval Expires 11/30/2020 U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Bureau of Justice Assistance Coronavirus Emergency Supplemental Funding Program Solicitation FY 2020 Formula Grant Solicitation CFDA #16.034 Solicitation Release Date: March 30, 2020 Application Deadline: 11:59 p.m. eastern time on May 29, 2020 The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), Office of Justice Programs (OJP), Bureau of Justice Assistance (BJA) is seeking applications for the Coronavirus Emergency Supplemental Funding Program. This solicitation incorporates the OJP Grant Application Resource Guide by reference. The OJP Grant Application Resource Guide provides guidance to applicants on how to prepare and submit applications for funding to OJP. If this solicitation expressly modifies any provision in the OJP Grant Application Resource Guide, the applicant is to follow the guidelines in this solicitation as to that provision. Eligibility The following entities are eligible to apply: • States, U.S. Territories, the District of Columbia, units of local government, and federally recognized tribal governments that were identified as eligible for funding under the Fiscal Year (FY) 2019 State and Local Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) Program are eligible to apply under the Coronavirus Emergency Supplemental Funding (CESF) Program solicitation. NOTE: Only the State Administering Agency that applied for FY 2019 JAG funding for a state/territory may apply for the state allocation of CESF funding. The eligible allocations for the FY 2020 CESF Program can be found at: https://bia.oip.gov/program/fy20-cesf-allocations. For the purposes of the CESF Program, please note the following: • The term "states" includes the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Northern Mariana Islands, the U.S. Virgin Islands, Guam, and American Samoa. (Throughout this solicitation, each reference to a "state" or "states" includes all 56 jurisdictions.) • The term "units of local government" includes a town, township, village, parish, city, county, borough, or other general purpose political subdivision of a state, or a federally recognized Indian tribal government that performs law enforcement functions (as determined by the Secretary of the Interior). A unit of local government also may be any law enforcement district or judicial enforcement district established under applicable state law with authority to independently establish a budget and impose taxes; for example, in Louisiana, a unit of local government means a district attorney or parish sheriff. • All recipients and subrecipients (including any for-profit organization) must forgo any profit or management fee. Contact information For technical assistance with submitting an application, contact the Grants Management System (GMS) Support Hotline at 888-549-9901, option 3, or via email at GMS.HelpDesk@usdoi.gov. The GMS Support Hotline operates 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, including federal holidays An applicant that experiences unforeseen GMS technical issues beyond its control that prevent it from submitting its application by the deadline must email the NCJRS Response Center contact identified below within 24 hours after the application deadline to request approval to submit its application after the deadline. Additional information on reporting technical issues appears under "Experiencing Unforeseen GMS Technical Issues" in the How to Apply (GMS) section in the OJP Grant Application Resource Guide. For assistance with any other requirement of this solicitation, applicants may contact the NCJRS Response Center by telephone at 1-800-851-3420; via TTY at 301-240-6310 (hearing impaired only); by email at grants@ncirs.gov; by fax to 301-240-5830; or by web chat at https://webcontact.ncirs.gov/ncichat/chat.isp. The NCJRS Response Center hours of operation are 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. eastern time, Monday through Friday, and 10:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. eastern time on the solicitation close date. Post-Award Legal Requirements Notice If selected for funding, in addition to implementing the funded project consistent with the OJP- approved application, the recipient must comply with all award conditions, and all applicable requirements of federal statutes and regulations (including applicable requirements referred to in the assurances and certifications executed in connection with award acceptance). OJP strongly encourages prospective applicants to review information on post-award legal requirements and common OJP award conditions prior to submitting an application. For additional information on these legal requirements, see the "Administrative, National Policy, and Other Legal Requirements" section in the OJP Grant Application Resource Guide. Deadline details Applicants must register in GMS at https://grants.oip.usdoi.gov/ prior to submitting an application under this solicitation. All applicants must register, even those that previously registered in GMS. Select the "Apply Online" button associated with the solicitation title. All registrations and applications are due by 11:59 p.m. eastern time May 29, 2020. For additional information, see the "How to Apply (GMS)" section in the OJP Grant Application Resource Guide. 2 BJA-2020-18553 Contents A. Program Description 4 Overview 4 Permissible uses of Funds 4 B. Federal Award Information 5 Type of Award 5 Financial Management and System of Internal Controls 5 Budget Information 5 Cost Sharing or Match Requirement 6 Pre-agreement Costs (also known as Pre-award Costs) 6 Prior Approval, Planning, and Reporting of Conference/Meeting/Training Costs 6 Costs Associated with Language Assistance (if applicable) 6 C. Eligibility Information 6 D. Application and Submission Information 6 What an Application Should Include 6 How to Apply 7 E. Application Review Information 7 Review Process 7 F. Federal Award Administration Information 8 Federal Award Notices 8 Administrative, National Policy, and Other Legal Requirements 8 Information Technology (IT) Security Clauses 8 General Information about Post-Federal Award Reporting Requirements 8 G. Federal Awarding Agency Contact(s) 9 H. Other Information 9 Freedom of Information and Privacy Act (5 U.S.C. 552 and 5 U.S.C. 552a) 9 Provide Feedback to OJP 9 Appendix A: Application Checklist 10 3 BJA-2020-18553 Coronavirus Emergency Supplemental Funding Program Solicitation CFDA # 16.034 A. Program Description Overview The Coronavirus Emergency Supplemental Funding (CESF) Program will provide funding to assist eligible states, local units of government, and tribes in preventing, preparing for, and responding to the coronavirus. Statutory Authority: The CESF Program is authorized by Division B of H.R. 748, Pub. L. No. 116- 136 (Emergency Appropriations for Coronavirus Health Response and Agency Operations); 28 U.S.C. 530C. Permissible uses of Funds Funds awarded under the CESF Program must be utilized to prevent, prepare for, and respond to the coronavirus. Allowable projects and purchases include, but are not limited to, overtime, equipment (including law enforcement and medical personal protective equipment), hiring, supplies (such as gloves, masks, sanitizer), training, travel expenses (particularly related to the distribution of resources to the most impacted areas), and addressing the medical needs of inmates in state, local, and tribal prisons, jails, and detention centers. Expenditures which require prior approval —There are no specific prohibitions under the CESF Program other than the unallowable costs that are identified in the DOJ Grants Financial Guide; however, the following items should be identified during application and appropriately justified as noted: • Individual items costing $500,000 or more — if the recipient intends to purchase an individual item that costs $500,000 or more, those item(s) should be identified and thoroughly justified by the grantee and receive written prior approval from BJA post-award through the submission and approval of a Grant Adjustment Notice (GAN). Costs must be reasonable to receive approval. • Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS), Unmanned Aircraft (UA), and/or Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV) — if the recipient requests to purchase an UAS, UA, and/or UAV, Federal Aviation Administration approval must be obtained as outlined here: https://www.faa.gov/news/fact sheets/news story.cfm?newsld=22615. Documentation related to these purchases should be included with the application or the applicant must receive written prior approval from BJA post-award through the submission and approval of a GAN. Draw-down — Consistent with the CESF Program's purposes, which involve assistance in responding to the present national emergency in connection with the coronavirus, OJP has determined that eligible states (or State Administering Agencies) or units of local government may draw down funds either in advance or on a reimbursable basis. To draw down in advance, funds must be placed in an interest-bearing account, unless one of the exceptions 4 BJA-2020-18553 in 2 C.F.R. § 200.305(b)(8) apply. This interest-bearing account must be dedicated specifically for the CESF Program award, and funds other awards or sources may not be commingled with the funds in the account established for the CESF Program award. It is not necessary that the interest-bearing account be a "trust fund." For additional information, see 2 C.F.R. § 200.305. Prohibition of supplanting — Funds may not be used to supplant state or local funds but must be used to increase the amounts of such funds that would, in the absence of federal funds, be made available. Limitation on direct administrative costs — Funds may not be used for direct administrative costs that exceed 10 percent of the total award amount. B. Federal Award Information Maximum number of awards BJA expects to make 1,873 Period of performance start date January 20, 2020 Period of performance duration 2 years Recipients have the option to request a one-time, up to 12-month extension. The extension must be requested via GMS no fewer than 30 days prior to the end of the performance period. The expected eligible allocations for the FY 2020 CESF Program can be found at: https://bja.ojp.gov/program/fy20-cesf-allocations. All awards are subject to the availability of appropriated funds and to any modifications or additional requirements that may be imposed by statute. Type of Award' BJA expects to make awards under this solicitation as grants. See the "Administrative, National Policy, and Other Legal Requirements" section of the OJP Grant Application Resource Guide for additional information. Financial Management and System of Internal Controls Award recipients and subrecipients (including recipients or subrecipients that are pass-through entities) must, as described in the Part 200 Uniform Requirements2 as set out at 2 C.F.R. 200.303, comply with standards for financial and program management. See OJP Grant Application Resource Guide for additional information. Budget Information This solicitation expressly modifies the OJP Grant Application Resource Guide by not incorporating the "Limitation on Use of Award Funds for Employee Compensation; Waiver" provision in the "Financial Information" section of the OJP Grant Application Resource Guide. For purposes of this solicitation, the phrase "pass-through entity" includes any recipient or subrecipient that provides a subaward ("subgrant")to carry out part of the funded award or program. 2 The "Part 200 Uniform Requirements"means the DOJ regulation at 2 C.F.R Part 2800, which adopts (with certain modifications)the provisions of 2 C.F.R. Part 200. 5 BJA-2020-18553 Cost Sharing or Match Requirement The CESF Program does not require a match. Please see the OJP Grant Application Resource Guide for information on the following: Pre-agreement Costs (also known as Pre-award Costs) Prior Approval, Planning, and Reporting of Conference/Meeting/Training Costs Costs Associated with Language Assistance (if applicable) C. Eligibility Information For eligibility information, see the title page. For information on cost sharing or match requirements, see Section B. Federal Award Information. D. Application and Submission Information What an Application Should Include See the "Application Elements and Formatting Instructions" section of the OJP Grant Application Resource Guide for information on what happens to an application that does not contain all the specified elements. (This solicitation expressly modifies the "Application Elements and Formatting Instructions" section of the OJP Grant Application Resource Guide by not incorporating paragraph two of that section (referring to nonresponsive applications or applications missing critical elements not "[proceeding] to peer review"). The solicitation further expressly modifies the "Application Attachments" section of the OJP Grant Application Resource Guide by not incorporating the "Applicant Disclosure of Pending Applications," "Applicant Disclosure and Justification — DOJ High Risk Grantees," and "Research and Evaluation Independence and Integrity" provisions.) 1. Application for Federal Assistance (Standard Form (SF)-424) The SF-424 is a required standard form used as a cover sheet for submission of pre-applications, applications, and related information. See the OJP Grant Application Resource Guide for additional information on completing the SF-424. Intergovernmental Review: This solicitation ("funding opportunity") is subject to Executive Order 12372. An applicant may find the names and addresses of State Single Points of Contact (SPOCs) at the following website: https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/spoc1 16 2020.pdf If the applicant's state appears on the SPOC list, the applicant must contact the State SPOC to find out about, and comply with, the state's process under E.O. 12372. In completing the SF-424, an applicant whose state appears on the SPOC list is to make the appropriate selection in response to question 19, once the applicant has complied with its State E.O. 12372 process. (An applicant whose state does not appear on the SPOC list should answer question 19 by selecting the response that the: "Program is subject to E.O. 12372, but has not been selected by the State for review.") 6 BJA-2020-18553 2. Program Narrative Describe the specific coronavirus prevention, preparation, and/or response efforts that will be addressed with this funding and include a summary of the types of projects or items that will be funded over the 2-year grant period. 3. Budget Information and Associated Documentation Please note that the budget narrative should include a full description of all costs, including administrative costs or indirect costs (if applicable). See the Budget Preparation and Submission Information section of the OJP Grant Application Resource Guide for details on the Budget Detail Worksheet, and on budget information and associated documentation, such as information on proposed subawards, proposed procurement contracts under awards, and pre-agreement costs. This solicitation expressly modifies the OJP Grant Application Resource Guide by not incorporating the "Information on proposed subawards" provision in the "Budget Preparation and Submission Information" section of the OJP Grant Application Resource Guide. Specifically, OJP is suspending the requirements for CESF grant recipients to receive prior approval (either at the time of award or through a Grant Adjustment Notice) before making subawards. For additional information regarding subawards and authorizations, please refer to the subaward section in the OJP Grant Application Resource Guide. Please see the OJP Grant Application Resource Guide for information on the following: 4. Indirect Cost Rate Agreement (if applicable) See the Budget Preparation and Submission Information section of the OJP Grant Application Resource Guide for information. 5. Financial Management and System of Internal Controls Questionnaire (including applicant disclosure of high risk status) 6. Disclosure of Lobbying Activities How to Apply An applicant must submit its application through GMS, which provides support for the application, award, and management of awards at OJP. Find information, registration, and submission steps on how to apply in GMS in response to this solicitation under How to Apply (GMS) in the OJP Grant Application Resource Guide. E. Application Review Information Review Process BJA reviews the application to make sure that the information presented is reasonable, understandable, measurable, achievable, and consistent with the solicitation. See the OJP Grant Application Resource Guide for information on the application review process. In addition, if OJP anticipates that an award will exceed $250,000 in federal funds, OJP also must review and consider any information about the applicant that appears in the nonpublic segment of the 7 BJA-2020-18553 integrity and performance system accessible through the System for Award Management (SAM) (currently, the Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System, FAPIIS). Important note on FAPIIS: An applicant, at its option, may review and comment on any information about itself that currently appears in FAPIIS and was entered by a federal awarding agency. OJP will consider any such comments by the applicant, in addition to the other information in FAPIIS, in its assessment of the risk posed by the applicant. Absent explicit statutory authorization or written delegation of authority to the contrary, the Assistant Attorney General will make all final award decisions. F. Federal Award Administration Information Please see the OJP Grant Application Resource Guide for information on the following: Federal Award Notices Administrative, National Policy, and Other Legal Requirements OJP strongly encourages prospective applicants to review information on post-award legal requirements and common OJP award conditions prior to submitting an application. In addition to implementing the funded project consistent with the OJP-approved application, the recipient must comply with all award conditions, and all applicable requirements of federal statutes and regulations (including applicable requirements referred to in the assurances and certifications executed in connection with award acceptance). For additional information on these legal requirements, see the "Administrative, National Policy, and Other Legal Requirements" section in the OJP Grant Application Resource Guide. Information Technology (IT) Security Clauses General Information about Post-Federal Award Reporting Requirements Any recipient of an award under this solicitation will be required to submit the following reports and data: Required reports. Recipients typically must submit quarterly financial status reports, semi- annual progress reports, final financial and progress reports, and, if applicable, an annual audit report in accordance with the Part 200 Uniform Requirements or specific award conditions. Future awards and fund drawdowns may be withheld if reports are delinquent. (In appropriate cases, OJP may require additional reports.) See the OJP Grant Application Resource Guide for additional information on specific post-award reporting requirements. OJP may restrict access to award funds if a recipient of an OJP award fails to report in a timely manner. 8 BJA-2020-18553 G. Federal Awarding Agency Contact(s) For OJP contact(s), see page 2 of this solicitation. For contact information for GMS, see page 2. H. Other Information Please see the OJP Grant Application Resource Guide for information on the following: Freedom of Information and Privacy Act (5 U.S.C. 552 and 5 U.S.C. 552a) Provide Feedback to OJP 9 BJA-2020-18553 Appendix A: Application Checklist Coronavirus Emergency Supplemental Funding Program: FY 2020 Solicitation This application checklist has been created as an aid in developing an application. What an Applicant Should Do: Prior to Registering in GMS: U Acquire a DUNS Number (see OJP Grant Application Resource Guide) U Acquire or renew registration with SAM (see OJP Grant Application Resource Guide) To Register with GMS: U For new users, acquire a GMS username and password* (see OJP Grant Application Resource Guide) U For existing users, check GMS username and password* to ensure account access (see OJP Grant Application Resource Guide) H Verify SAM registration in GMS (see OJP Grant Application Resource Guide) H Search for and select correct funding opportunity in GMS (see OJP Grant Application Resource Guide) H Register by selecting the "Apply Online" button associated with the funding opportunity title (see OJP Grant Application Resource Guide) H Read OJP policy and guidance on conference approval, planning, and reporting available at_ oip.gov/financialquide/DOJ/PostawardRequirements/chapter3.10a.htm (see OJP Grant Application Resource Guide) If experiencing technical difficulties in GMS, contact the NCJRS Response Center (see page 2) *Password Reset Notice— GMS users are reminded that while password reset capabilities exist, this function is only associated with points of contact designated within GMS at the time the account was established. Neither OJP nor the GMS Help Desk will initiate a password reset unless requested by the authorized official or a designated point of contact associated with an award or application. Overview of Post-Award Legal Requirements: U Review the "Overview of Legal Requirements Generally Applicable to OJP Grants and Cooperative Agreements - FY 2020 Awards" in the OJP Funding Resource Center. 10 BJA-2020-18553 Scope Requirement: _I The eligible allocations for the FY 2020 CESF Program can be found at: https://bia.oip.gov/program/fy20-cesf-allocations. Eligibility Requirement: States, U.S. Territories, the District of Columbia, units of local government, and federally recognized tribal governments that were identified as eligible for funding under the FY 2019 State and Local JAG Program will be eligible to apply under the CESF Program solicitation. NOTE: Only the State Administering Agency that applied for FY 2019 JAG funding for a state/territory may apply for the state allocation of CESF funding. What an Application Should Include: U Application for Federal Assistance (SF-424) (see OJP Grant Application Resource Guide) U Intergovernmental Review (see page 6) U Program Narrative (see page 7) U Budget Detail Worksheet (see page 7) U Budget Narrative (see page 7) U Indirect Cost Rate Agreement (if applicable) (see page 7) U Financial Management and System of Internal Controls Questionnaire (see OJP Grant Application Resource Guide) U Disclosure of Lobbying Activities (SF-LLL) (see OJP Grant Application Resource Guide) 11 BJA-2020-18553 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: May 26, 2020 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: [' consent ❑ old business ® new business [' public hearing [' information ❑ admin. report [' pending legislation [' executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Motion Consideration: Planning Commission Mayoral Appointment GOVERNING LEGISLATION: Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) 18.10 PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: February 18, 2020: Council approved Mayoral Recommended appointments of Fred Beaulac and Sherri Robinson, each for a three-year term, and Matthew Walton for a one-year term, all beginning January 1, 2020. BACKGROUND: According to SVMC 18.10, members of the Planning Commission shall be nominated by the Mayor and confirmed by a majority vote of at least four members of the City Council. Planning Commissioners shall be selected without respect to political affiliations, and shall serve without compensation. On April 28, 2020, Mayor Wick received a resignation letter from Matthew Walton, effective May 14, 2020, informing of his resignation due to his moving out of our City limits. Since being appointed, and in large part due to the coronavirus pandemic, the Planning Commission has only held three meetings. During the April 28, 2020 Council meeting, Mayor Wick informed Council of Mr. Walton's resignation, and that his term expires the end of this year. Mayor Wick asked Council if there were any objections to him re-reviewing the applications from those who had applied before, and choosing someone from those applications. There were no objections. OPTIONS: Confirm or not confirm, the Mayor's recommendation for this appointment. If the Mayor's recommendation is not confirmed by Council, the Mayor may either make another recommendation, or the matter can be postponed. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: I move to confirm the Mayoral nomination of Walt Heneke to the Planning Commission, effective immediately, to complete the unexpired term of Mr. Walton, which expires December 31, 2020. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: n/a STAFF CONTACT: Mayor Wick ATTACHMENTS: Application from Mr. Heneke Application Form for Committees/Boards/Com lens >vj go i ' Q�ne Return completed form to Cit rile: Ors. <"0 Vlipv, Spokane Valley City Hall �^;, �7p �9 10210 East Sprague Avenue Spokane Val 9Sf Phone:509-720-5102 cbainbridgeOsnokanev 4� � L/ [Note: To meet an application deadline, applications may be faxed or e-mailed. However, the Clerk's office will need an on.:Ial;fsignd��Py application prior to appointment. One application per position please. DO NOT SUBMIT AN APPLICATION UNLESS THE AN OPENING.OPENINGS ARE POSTED ON THE CITY'S WEBPAGE AND ADVERTISED IN THE LOCAL NEWSPAPERS. Call the City Clerk if you have questions.] I AM INTERESTED IN SERVING ON THE FOLLOWING COMMITTEE: [Check one box;note requirements] [X]Planning Commission—Must be a Spokane Valley resident. (See chapter 18.10 SVMC) Terms are for three years.Applicants are selected without respect to political affiliations,and serve without compensation. [ ] Lodging Tax Advisory Committee(LTAC)-Need not be a Spokane Valley resident. (See chapter 3.20 SVMC) Terms are for one or two years.Committee consists of five members: One Councilmember:appointed by the Mayor,confirmed by the Council. Two who represent a business required to collect the tax(hotels,motels,etc.). Two involved in funded activities(such as a non-profit organization to increase tourism), Identify the business or organization you represent • [ ] Spokane County Housing and Community Development Advisory Committee(HCDAC) HCDAC includes two Spokane Valley residents;terms not to exceed three years. Spokane Valley appointment pending final approval by Spokane County Board of Commissioners. Spokane County Application and Supplemental Application also required. [ ] Spokane County Human Rights Task Force —Terms are for four years.Must be a resident of Spokane Valley. The Board currently meets 2nd Tuesday of each month,3:30 to 5:00 at Catholic Charities, 12 E 5n'Spokane. [ ] Spokane Housing Authority(SHA)—regional committee,five members. Terms are five years. One individual directly assisted by the Authority,jointly appointed by Spokane Mayor,Spokane Valley Mayor,and Chair of Board of County Commissioners. Two individuals who work or reside within Spokane City limits. One individual who works or resides in unincorporated Spokane County, One individual who works or resides within Spokane Valley City limits. Check with the City Clerk concerning a vacancy on this committee. [ ] Tourism Promotion Area,Hotel Advisory Committee(aka Hotel/Motel Association)—Terms are for three years. Spokane Valley appoints two members,and one ex-officio(a member of Council). All nominees must be operators or employees of lodging business within Spokane.County. [ ] Other: Name(please print): Walt Haneke Complete residence address: 14924 E, 23rd Spokane Valley 99037 Street City Zip Code Complete mailing address (if different from above address): Length of time residing at current address: 31 years U.S. Citizen? [ ]yes [ ]no WA State registered voter? [X]yes [ ]no What is your preferred way for us to contact you: [Note:Ifyou have an unlisted phone number, or do not wish your e- mail address made public, do not include that information. Once this document is submitted to the City, it becomes subject to public disclosure.] [ ] Home Phone: [ ] Work phone: [X] Cell Phone: (208)661-8717 [ ] Other message phone: [X]E-mail address: (please print clearly): whaneke@acinw.com [ ]Regular mail to residence or mailing address shown above EMPLOYMENT: (Please start with most recent) 1. [I present [ ] previous Name of employer: ACI Northwest, Inc. Address: 6600 N. Government Way,Dalton Gardens,Idaho 83815 Phone: (208)209-0199 Position held: Senior Project Manager Dates of employment: 1999 to Present 2, [ ] present [X] previous Name of employer: North Central Construction, Inc. Address: 13184 Wheeler Road NE,Moses Lake, Washington 98837 Phone: (509) 765-5885 Position held: Senior Project Manager Dates of employment: 1992 to 1999 3. [ ] present [ ] previous Name of employer: Inland Asphalt Co, Address: 5111 E.Broadway Avenue, Spokane Valley, WA 99212 Phone: (509)534-2657 Position held: Senior Estimator/Portable Branch Manager Dates of employment: 1987 to 1992 4. [ ] present [ ] previous Name of employer: Address: Phone: Position held: Dates of employment: EDUCATION: Name of high school University High School Address: 10212 Est 9th Ave., Spokane Valley, WA Diploma or GED: [N yes [ ] no Trade school/college/university: Name of School Washington State University Address: Pullman, Washington Diploma: [ ] yes [X] no Degree or certification earned: Trade school/college/university: Name of School Address: Diploma: [ ] yes [ ] no Degree or certification earned: Other relevant certifications/licenses: VOLUNTEER EXPERIENCE: Name of social,fraternal, organizations,etc. 1. [N current [ ] previous AGC Scholarship Committee 2. [X] current [ ] previous AGC Government Affairs Committee 3. [ ] current [ ] previous 4. [ ] current [ ] previous PROFESSIONAL ORGANIZATIONS. Local, state,or national government boards,committees, or commissions on which you serve or have served. 1. [ ] current [ ] previous Board Member- Associated General Contractors of Inland Northwest 2. [ ]current [N previous President-Associated General Contractors of Inland Northwest 3. [ ] current [N previous Board Member-Washington State Chapter of National Asphalt Pavement Association 4, [ ] current [ ] previous 5. [ ]current [ ] previous REASONS for applying for this committee,Commission, board: I have lived in Spokane Valley almost my entire life,grade school, Junior High,High School and most of my employment career.I want to see us continue to grow within sensible guide lines. My experience as a contractor has e t osed me to many of the pluses and minuses of development. I am familiar with the Growth Management Act and believe 1 would brine a fair and balanced perspective to the committee. By signing this application, I certify under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington that all information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further state that my appointment would not represent a conflict of interest or an appearance of a conflict of interest with the duties of this position, I understand this application is subje t to disclosure pursuant to chapter 42.56 RCW. / ---,or /F/ /+t / Signa ure Dat igne CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: May 26, 2020 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑consent ❑old business ❑new business ❑public hearing ❑information ® admin.report ❑pending legislation ❑executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Administrative report — update on property acquisition of Washington State Depaitnient of Transportation (WSDOT)Flora Road property. GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 35A.11.020; SVMC 3.49.010. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN:November 12,2019 approval of 2019 Spokane Valley Parks and Recreation Master Plan Update; February 11, 2020 winter workshop discussion on Recreation Conservation Office (RCO) grant opportunities; February 25, 2020 administrative report on potential purchase; administrative report (scheduled as a motion, which was later withdrawn) March 17, 2020; administrative report March 31, 2020;April 7, 2020 Resolution#20-006 seeking Council authorization to apply for a RCO grant,the proceeds of which would partially offset the cost of the acquisition (action on resolution was deferred until a later date); Admin Report April 28, 2020 Resolution #20-008 seeking Council authorization to apply for an RCO grant,the proceeds of which would partially offset the cost of the acquisition; May 12, 2020 Council approved Resolution 20-008 authorizing staff to apply for a RCO Grant for the Flora Road property. BACKGROUND: The City has been negotiating with the WSDOT for the acquisition of 45.73 acres east of Flora Road, immediately north of the Spokane River. The property would be used for park purposes. The purchase price is $2,091,600, which was established by appraisal. A small section of the easterly portion of the property abuts the Spokane River, with the rest of the property having a 225 foot strip of property belonging to Washington State Parks between the Spokane River and the property to be purchased. A map is attached for further reference. The property is largely in a natural state,with extensive coniferous trees along the westerly and southerly boundaries. The City is in the process of applying for a grant from the Washington State Recreation and Conservation Office for up to one million dollars to offset part of the purchase price. The overall economic picture is not changed much from March 17,2020 when Council withdrew its motion consideration. Staff believes some updated financial information is likely to come forward in the end of June and July. Staff also checked in with WSDOT representatives on May 15 to see if anything has changed in the event we need a full six months to schedule a motion on whether or not to purchase the property. The City's contact has advised that this is still a good date,and we will continue to stay in touch if anything looks like it may change. Staff for the City made a short video of the Flora site that it hoped to use in its RCO grant application process, but was advised it could not. The video will be shown at the meeting as a visual for those who have not been able to physically visit the site. OPTIONS: Discussion RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Discussion BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: $2,091,600 plus associated costs such as title insurance. Staff previously suggested the sources of funds to facilitate the acquisition could be comprised of the following: • $500,000 from the Capital Reserve Fund#312 that has been earmarked for park land acquisition; • $281,209 from the Capital Reserve Fund#312 that is currently unallocated; and • $1,310,391 (plus any costs associated with closing)from General Fund reserves, • Reallocating money in Fund#312 that is currently earmarked for other projects(if Council were to do so, Staff recommends that no projects currently underway be impacted). • Potentially up to $1,000,000 from an RCO grant. The 2020 Budget for both the General Fund and Capital Reserve Fund#312 would need to be amended for the acquisition. STAFF CONTACT: Cary Driskell,City Attorney;Mike Stone,Parks and Recreation Director. ATTACHMENTS: Overhead map of the site; Short video showing the site (not attached due to size,but will be available for showing) , � _.. _ r •dR•- 1 1 ..:....: :.. :ffilimmaiiik' '�Y i � - �'� � a ,•101:0:: a„I 0;3.: , , ,iiiiir a x 1 -..: . s ..1:.,'• 1 -z- - -.."--',..• a%.''-1-°z°- : I, i J:" Kiri r. F ^L ".,:r.41,.• - � — d .8:e5 �-'Y .. ,....77.....1,,..: ,Y:m 0. , •L 7 "^ _ ' .. =:s ' Q til Nom` • - jllIllhl � G, �+T+ '_u1 '& Y` -' N C � I_. g3 L-.L, ,.., :>r • Ra - -„..fl 7.-7-c-'-'' d y., ,11,1`'a r d' ��' ; • •. mili..._ . /40 . . . ..., ^ fid. F ' r i Dalton - ,. • E Industrial Park E St <1'4 r” ': " r • Milli ' rw,.. , v _ .:, �- _.. , a ,I1 'p F �,.' '' , .I 'i y ':. _,4 i'r .. - .. +' •�" x .. --� i"' ,tsl �.. L - • ;6 r � � b tie.'/:" ,.� ter,-a ?, ,APAI �3, s d _ .., r mac/ „.,." i , I _ _ r i ti z ��: �.�-�-- �'' a� I '� � QFairview t Q Ln „,r ;. E Euclid - tF ;< + ,, ( a o' r_ct I•. - t. " Grace Ave : > rQ ,fi : j' : ..._ ��,f. - !.,..fm*- ' r�'� '�r= . itim _.. i I c'''' '',-.--;441'.'l $ i t' I. 1".�i i ..-*. { l _,.,..„,,..1‘,,''-.--" ..----:----. Y ,-f,' 4 - '� Y I, p t 't 54 (...'.f Vtl. vii - 3 1.1 b. A 'Q 13 eye }p �r y <) " i, ti '100 i." { �` .✓^,?a�+,,Jii-v 21r2` ,},i' a, _ 'y -.-" r', .? .a °0 q s5i �e 'ifs. • A? i r < ` - • " - ,. A ■ , e. :. .: E. r•.- ;� ' • i'', - �.-{c:li*� .. „..., _ ,'441:!,4,:1,-,,, -.�a'i rte .. " . g�$t;%Ni �j t:,r a a. • • F'µ `>, '` ..,....•,..-- i f t7 # s, '"1 4 ..., ..._, [[tet,. . - rr wy ' .� :_.:..�sa_ ,@ t '",-�[ ..,.•T ''sy ,,o'`'ff' y� ,l' P ,, • Nif ', ri . ti+. ^IYi. v $ ,fit, � art -- y‘ -s. ,,: j ,. .-, Pa te' • ... Ast (r p'� {..!-...r,!_-'"—. s a •-'� �" 4 �, ry �a,a3 • 4.� c ? S 1,',. ..„ -,,,„„.1 ...• ) 1 ,, _ 4:• - ••--4 • #, k.i s::, � F` t 0,4, 8 7 • j ` ' ra. � `C �y a`\_ !t s"" .� - Montgomery �r . 5 ..:,,,,7.;-..::: •,,IA - , As Ir- ' 1 , r l' ' , r...1„.(1.-Iii.r, , AA , ,. , N , aN rr, . � �1 s .�q,ry, i' „ .r R �"" �_ l Mansfield '. .< ..: -•,, ..,.., .,,toff-,.-,.I '. r :. --- _ x�- 'y :! 4 \, i v Ave , wt w .ae , 4. *E, Ir,"-) ,-:.,:,,,,7:,i.:.: • fa , y r - .7.:-, _ .,.'�'". • r .�• _ ti r I.0,,_.-7...,1„, - ; hann0 AVe 'i € . �"JI y ✓ '> E'S r ��-� M ERrbervvay • ,_ , I'� :.oF -: r. - ,. .4 erg', - _F, .r .f-n _ _ - -�..•.; hr • C� -+f'-, :' c"N=Ln.Y�' e, 1 �b CI ��' I � � F .-I,!' ,,,-.,,,4 � I_ ' ... 1G .` , 5. ,..• �+' 0'.-.,,,,'.. 1;., '^,. - ..�� .� .. �, 1:•• rt*--- r {� Kra ,- ,,r,; wE_Knox Aved i' - �:d E Michielli �F- r tm„ aq p Fp,�c! t ,. v r.., ,, s +:; pr ..: r�( {�f�ll ,S. t,—l''' j '� Y-: 4,e�sh.•:..t- I- q"^' �, ( ; 1.� w:, i < ' ��.. :' � I� ]al; 9 :._1 �Ir y,a _ is : .: 9" �s"-b Ve „�` :� d 4 -.44,-0, EKnoxLn ��7 r.�x.� -L 3 � r3 ¢�A. ��w x t i r� y^ mrr,i• _C IT ,fc : 1�-]e rr r' L'3 a ��:< .:, � �` �k. ��,II r` T �_ v' � °f � �E Indiana Ave'- .,-,c,,,„1 ,f,tr' h_ . , !e-- i :'i ,' r` ft I. T • SfA7 : f' _1 t a , 'r Ir". ��' ' .,: j� ;r '? ;. fr „' "� _ Z irJ • _ Z _ 9r1`r,na f- - 1y. #tca r ,a. • -▪„▪; ,-ia cs,�.-'l E Baldwin Avet. cor _,,” Allan t _ _ Wit. II -,..e ) - .: � r: .. - w Ln • • A• l'tit, s 1 ,y v,° z � , / : - Mora �` + `1 . Legend k F 4,. r,.' ,' : .,. _`r p �' .a E �;, y ��Nora L/� d Y i o ±� ,""t`. ti•. .1-7-'-v-....'' N_- , ., ,,, e` s ii I J r t•�. ,:,�.r.:l , r': o - .rN r- S. vM Ave rk °a �� _rI. , - WSDOT Property a 1 " s^ 'z-� ..:... .,: . aill � '� �:i' —.._ -�7 ti <o Augusta '� `i"•1 �, .. ., ::.,, If- Ln fig.: Q I ;x> -r',, `. :'; R a: it..., : .:z C Aline, - ,P , r -, z 'rte ,' te ,, fir' �.._ Parcels t '.,, ,. ^,•,.,.. ✓ is: r;,�q ,]ya i : ,tS s.sx.,l' �"r �.t<o.:� 7L. .:�i — • V r,' er , ■. . {l ` Y A�.. 5 - a _. - ri'..- L,a. �" — 't► . . ,�' ,y , :,_�, .-_,: .- ... ,.x •... ✓ •Y�y � ,�_}' .'tom MissionAve , < ,, `..' -*--..N.. t Q� -. ,.az,..� .y f r, �,. 0 250 500 1,000 rte , ,.ktei ,,•, - -- ., _- O Q� - fA ' ,f-'y.:,�. R E,- ' " �� <-r1 1r - Feet • -'-•••'-'".4..".;,.._„.„.� ;`i' a tf �r%' Z 1A-* ` >n x=r'..: •'...1,••'7;,..':.c.:.‘ y •1e4- r I •��l � • I �,wC� ,„' z<E!....;,..-• '� �f'� r" I - ,�_ itK m , , ' / �c �y � 7 ,• z, N Mxwell^Ave' , • F P i j' .;._x, .r ..e. .., 4 ISI ( �.. [� _ r-- •''��;. - .-� 1`,y,,� - "�� ". "' dace.5.. I l i .. ^ i•'r .. . ° _ _ _. _, - E' • CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: May 26, 2020 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: [' consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ® admin. report ❑ pending legislation [' executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Administrative Report —Pavement Management Program Update GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 35A.11.020 — Powers vested in legislative bodies of noncharter and charter code cities. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: The topics of street operations and maintenance, pavement preservation, and associated funding mechanisms have been discussed with Council since shortly after the City's incorporation. This topic has been before Council at least 47 times, tonight marking the 48th occurrence: Date Meeting Type Presentation Type Subject/Activity • 10/12/2004 Regular Administrative Report Budget Discussion: Street Fund • 10/12/2004 Regular Informational Item Utility Tax Scenarios 10/26/2004 Regular Pending Legislation First Reading: Proposed Utility Tax • Ordinance 11/02/2004 Study Session Pending Legislation Public Comment: Proposed Utility Tax • Ordinance 11/09/2004 Regular Pending Legislation First Reading: Proposed Utility Tax • Ordinance • 11/16/2004 Study Session Informational Item Update on Utility Tax Data 12/07/2004 Study Session Pending Legislation First Reading: Proposed Utility Tax • Ordinance • 01/11/2005 Regular Administrative Report Utility Tax Report 04/05/2005 Study Session Informational Item Pavement Management and Associated • Policy Issues • 06/11/2005 Workshop Informational Item Review of Budget Goals 12/20/2005 Study Session Informational Item Draft Scope of Work for Street Masterplan • and Related Activities 02/11/2006 Workshop Informational Item Review Budget Goals: Draft a well-defined • Street Master Plan, with Funding Options Motion Consideration: Amendment to JUB • 10/10/2006 Regular Informational Item Contract for Street MasterPlan for Street Development Standards • 12/19/2006 Study Session Informational Item Street MasterPlan Update • 01/27/2007 Workshop Informational Item Adopt a street master plan • 06/02/2007 Workshop Informational Item Summer Retreat- No specific topic • 07/17/2007 Study Session Administrative Report Draft Street Master Plan Presentation • 10/16/2007 Study Session Administrative Report Street Masterplan 07/22/2008 Regular Pending Legislation First Reading of Proposed Ordinance 08-014 • Telephone Tax 08/12/2008 Regular Motion Consideration Second Reading of Proposed Ordinance 08- • 014 Telephone Tax • 01/20/2009 Study Session Informational Item J-U-B Street Master Plan Update • 08/17/2010 Study Session Informational Item Street Preservation Program • 08/17/2010 Study Session Informational Item City Transportation Benefit District • 12/27/2011 Regular Informational Item Street Preservation (Info only) • 02/07/2012 Workshop Informational Item Street Preservation Funding Options • 03/20/2012 Study Session Administrative Report Pavement Management Plan • 03/27/2012 Regular Administrative Report Funding Options, Pavement Management 03/27/2012 Regular Motion Consideration Pavement Management Plan Update for • 2011 • 04/10/2012 Regular Motion Consideration PMP-One time General Fund transfer • 06/12/2012 Special Informational Item Public Works • 12/17/2013 Study Session Administrative Report Pavement Management Plan Update 03/15/2016 Workshop Informational Item Planning for sustained funding of PMP • beyond 2020 • 06/14/2016 Workshop Informational Item Transportation & Infrastructure Issues 11/01/2016 Study Session Administrative Report Transportation and Infrastructure Funding - • Utility Taxes 11/08/2016 Regular Public Hearing Transportation and Infrastructure Funding - • Utility Taxes 12/06/2016 Special Special Meeting Transportation and Infrastructure Funding - • Utility Tax Proposal 02/14/2017 Workshop Informational Item Street O&M, Pavement Preservation and • Street Construction • 01/9/2018 Regular Administrative Report Solid Waste Collection Street-Wear Fee 01/30/2018 Study Session Motion Consideration Waste Management Contract Amendment, • Street-Wear Fee 02/13/2018 Workshop Informational Item Street O&M, Pavement Preservation and • Street Construction 05/29/2018 Study Session Administrative Report Street O&M Fund #101 - Level of • Service/Financial Challenges • 06/12/2018 Workshop Informational Item Street Operations & Maintenance Fund • 07/10/2018 Regular Administrative Report Telephone Utility Tax • 04/2/2019 Study Session Administrative Report Pavement Preservation • 6/18/2019 Study Session Administrative Report Pavement Management Ad-Hoc Commission • 10/1/2019 Study Session Administrative Report History of Pavement Management Program • 10/29/2019 Study Session Administrative Report Discuss formation of Ad-Hoc Committee • Since 2011, Council has approved annual budgetary General Fund transfers to the Pavement Preservation Fund. Between 2011 and 2020 these transfers total approximately$10 million. BACKGROUND: Between summer 2018 and spring 2019, staff contracted with Nichols Consulting Engineers (NCE) to evaluate the City's Pavement Management Program (PMP). As part of the evaluation, NCE included findings and recommendations as part of their final report to the City. Since spring 2019, staff has begun implementing these recommendations. The City's updates to its PMP improve the PMP evaluation software and operability. Using these updated tools, however, indicate the financial need for the PMP remains at $10 million annually to maintain the street network in its current condition. Since 2011, the City has averaged $6 million of annual expenditures to maintain its PMP. These contributions are predominately a combination of various City funds and state or federal grant funds. The $4 million deficit in the program ($10 million - $6 million = $4 million) is expected to increase due to steadily declining revenues in Street Fund #101, which relies on telephone utility and gas tax revenue. OPTIONS: Discussion Only. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Staff requests Council direction regarding any outstanding questions or concerns that may exist regarding the Pavement Management Program. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Impacts to the program will be dependent on Council direction. STAFF CONTACT: John Hohman, Deputy City Manager Chelsie Taylor, Finance Director Bill Helbig, City Engineer Adam Jackson, Engineer— Planning & Grants Engineer ATTACHMENTS: PowerPoint Presentation ----himil_._..... Pavement Management Program Update bit : Recent Developments to the PMP it 'ai" Ilmilfiiir ea. 44 t 1, City of Spokane Valley' May 26, 2020 Spokane" � jUalley Outlinef.11l Iii Spokane Valley diosiO - PMP History =int -__,..-0*-- _ _____ PMP Developments y Current Status Final Report Evaluation of Pavement Management Pmgmm March 20,2019 Street Fund # 101 1 N C E Ram PA, MSS S.AAlagma Are..Sono III Raw RE 89509 -' 4_ , _, ' Next Steps - -: : -••• * .- „ City of Spokane Valley a- �+�� ~— ,_ 0 - 692-10 E.Sprague Avenue ` (` - — Spokane Palley,Wk 99206 /I .. . �\ /2-j _ 2 PMP History ______ Spokane Valley 2004 2006/2007 2008 Proposed Utility Tax > City conducts its 1st > Telephone Utility Tax 2011 discussion does not PMP Approved and Fund #311 Created move forward Street Master Plan Effective in 2009 1 2012 2013 2014 2016 $2.0 Million of General Civic Facility Replacement Council sets goal for a Proposed Utility Tax Fund #123 transfers $2.3 sustainable PMP Fund surplus used for Million into Fund #311 discussion does not Preservation Projects over 4 years (recurring thru 2019) move forward 1 y 2018 2019 2020 Going Forward: Solid Waste Collection > 3rd Party PMP Review > 2019 condition survey Public Outreach results, action items, Fee New survey contract & improvements Identify Targets 3 soo f 71yHistorykar�e pmp Valley Dates Back to October 12, 2004 47 Pavement Management Specific Council Items 21 Informational Items Ef F� 1 „,„.._, ,, cavi.....- WM..ia- 16 Administrative Reportsis o " ` i00,01111 ,4,,„L,6 Public Hearings and/or PendingLegislation aow« ' zr � mcw `° "auk AA.8Z s.v0tt, .�ha, A�tt n4.. "� � to-.`" V nmb s' wxVr Vre 5 A 6M "r. r"p""...'.�+ "',iae.�1 nmtL� yn msµ"'` ""r«. 1 Special Meeting M�, ` ` • r�1ev ' w�n .. sti 3 Motion Considerations A �w7.117Z;'7%:.\:,,,,m uwwµ+�r �0r �'^a,ay it,,,,, w ....... 44 Unique Council Meeting Dates/Times ,,,..„. "at: " �a 1G0.4V C 4 9' qw°erwi `' 'r b '•••,fid" Yw Ra 32 Council Meetings (Regular, Study Session) { ` � r..r4F ",�.,,, tip, �".w»""��^�.. a., wpk 12 Workshops, Retreats, Specia I Meetings 4 ,,....,'-'. .,\,_..,...• , s vkane Current Status dim...dal ley 2019 NCE Study : Overall a Good PMP STREET Roads Asset Management Plan StreetScan/StreetLogix Software _ 4. Most User-Friendly Programs Available =„ ;, i Budget Planner & Scenario Builder am---. a 4�� g ■� . Staff Program Training is Ongoing v� _ CI Data QA Process is Ongoing o • 7/ ,.. ... Vk! • Q. lx 2x 3x r , L J 5 „,, f!I 1 f 71 C to urrentStatus S' xe Valley StreetSca n/StreetLog ix Software Pavement: Maintenance Suggestion Percentage Visually Easy to Follow Moderate Panel Replacement , Light Rehab litalion ti Joint Rehabilitation&Crack Seal Preventive Maintenance Easy to Understand User Inputs Heavy Rehabilitation Intuitive "Screen Appeal” _ Decision Tree Editor X 1 Budget Planner _, -— ::ll 1 l I II - Set PCI Breaks for Asphalt Select asset Pavement too .etre • � — default scenario I rcha`rrdAr - Year Length yl) Cast{$) Average Network PCI PCI Change ^ Av + E Mdse + i year 1 as I 7 _ la 1 54993 6,949,895 74.89 -0.96 ,. ! Anoka I t year2 xo � ��sh,_ �a4l�y r� _ JaratlaiF _year3 so__ 2 95968 6,949,868 74.45 -0.44 $a�.c jvJ , . 7 others ao 3 123400 6,949,679 74.59 D.14 e r ItIWrL` - a +1 1 t 1- • zs;� y 4 open the attribute table to see retails of the segments. 1 - i t:hange features in result layer manually on the map. 111%- I 0 1 i Color Maintenance Method Unit Cost[yd') year 1 + t Segment J - Defer Maintenance $0 Segment LiGet Charttlefault_oeenario y Preventive Maintenance $3 ;;i Cabo.ss Filter Sy map extent Q zoom to NClear selection 3 Refresh - Surface Treatment $14 a Generate Report Q Light Rehabilitation $35 Year Street From To Street Functional Surface Width(ft) ss id pra objectid Name Street Name Class Type Heavy Rehabilitation $50 Name Reconstruction $65 1 0 E Sprague S Coleman S Girard Rd Major Arterial Asphalt 56 396 77 Pr' l7f Edil CI Delete a method @Add new method Ave Rd Mt 6 1 1 5 Dishman E 7th Ave E 4th Ave Major Arterial Asphalt 62 737 75 5r Li Apply Apply and Save Reset A Download Li Save ®Delete Mica Rd Tr l l l f 71 �fpvky r�e CurrentStatus a Valley streetlogix PCI " Bump" Upwards : Old 70 > New 76 . Dashboard X V Statistics — 6 PCI points is acceptable considering T AP Fo change of survey method and vendor. ry° t i Data Validation by NCE (01-31-20 Memo) • o 8. Pavement Average PCI:76 3 I Total Length:438 miles City of Spokane PCI Network Average : 64 Maintenance Backlog:$99,720,095 — 1. ii .1 j ._JAnnual Cost to Maintain Remains $ 10M q.� f> ."� e�ai 41;11 . �• a-� le I "C'iSS• -�. •4411 rte 4^*,=� IE '_ ! JJ.. " It's cheaper tokeep goodroads good. � ^'s1=E ! [- 917t !srA�t0-. -- P ' Maintain existing network condition. ��. f!I 1 f 74 � Spokane 2011 - 2019 dim...Valley How much has the City funded versus the PMP recommendations? $15,000,000 $14,000,000 PMP Budget to Maintain PC $13,300,000 PMP Budget to Maintain PCI PMP Budget to Maintain PCI $13,000,000 N $7,250,000 $10,000,000 i $12,000,000 3 iiiii $11,000,000 PMP Budget to Maintain PCI $9,900,000 PMP Budget to Maintain PCI $9,592,397 Q $10,000,000 $9,564,110 . $7,500,000 L $9,000,000 $8,000,000 Grant & Other Funds I Avg. Annual Amount: $2.1 Million $6,961,931 �� 71) $7,000,000 $6,080,237 CC $6,132,468 a $6,000,000 Fund #303/311 Expenditures — $5,623,855 a $5,000,000 Avg. Annual Amount: $2.8 Million $4,554,166 _ fiMPBudgetto 3 $4,000,000 $3,628,254 Maintain PCI = Fund #101 Expenditures 1 I $2,994,723 Q $3,000,000 Avg. Annual Amount: $1.1 Million $7,000,000 $2,000,000 I le R $1,000,000 — Annual Actual PMP Totals Avg. Annual Amount: $6.1 Million $0 • 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 8 Year �pvkar�e Current Status .000Valley Based on Historical Annual Expenditures : 2011-2019 Average Annual PMP Expenditures by Fund Est. Cost to Maintain PCI $ 10,000,000 ($6,125,793 Total) Average Actual Expenditures $ 6,000,000 Average Annual PMP Deficit ($ 4,000,000) Grant & Fund Other Funds #303/311 $2,169,205 Expenditures Street Fund # 101 Contribution 36% $2,836,351 46% Funded by Excess General Fund Contribution Fund #101 2019 Actual $ 907,500 Expenditures 2020 Budgeted $ 1,364,706 $1'18;o237 9 Street Fund # 101 v Goals Include : Implement private contracts for street maintenance services. Continue on-going roadway and bridge maintenance and repairs. Finalize 6-year Bridge Maintenance Program and begin implementation . Implement identified signal timing plans for the Argonne, Pines, and Sullivan Corridors. Work with other departments in developing a city-wide, comprehensive Asset Management Program, incl . transportation operations facilities. Finalize a comprehensive Pavement Preservation Program, including funding source identification . 10 � y S"' "Ekane pv StreettreetSFund Valley Maintenance Work Includes : jJ �, Fy Snow and Ice Control - — r = ' 1` ped Pavement Repairs Pavement Maintenance ® , _: li 11 . I7br „ .� _ - Traffic Signals and Signs 6. - r —�- fir': 1.� -1!''r' ., AIL � Street Lighting Street Sweeping Sidewalk Repairs 11 i Vegetation Control }ii 1`07. i .i A r Prelim . 2021 Street Fund # 101 Bs2piii,4/1Tealley Estimated Annual Expenses Wages / Payroll Taxes / Benefits $ 1, 128,000 Contracted Traffic Engineering $ 215,000 Miscellaneous Services & Charges $ 124,000 Road Maintenance Supplies $ 119,000 Contracted Street Maintenance $ 1,532,000 Governmental Street Maintenance (WSDOT, County) $ 935,000 Traffic Control System Maintenance Supplies $ 132,000 Street Lighting $ 485,000 Bridge Maintenance $ 91,000 Snow Operations $ 800,000 Total Estimated Annual Expenses $ 5,561,000 12 Prelim . 2021 Street Fund # 101 Bs2ii.,1411,ealley Estimated Annual Revenue Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax $ 1,715,000 Multimodal Transportation $ 113,000 Telephone Utility Tax $ 1,500,000 ROW Maintenance Fee $ 70,000 Miscellaneous Revenues $ 48,000 Total Estimated Annual Revenue $ 3,446,000 Total Estimated Annual Expenses $ 5,561,000 Total Estimated Fund Deficit ($ 2,115,000) 13 Next Steps Siokane ,00Valley City Council Direction Budgeting and Economic Forecasts Street Fund # 101 Deficit Spending Pavement Management Program Funding and Level Of Service Ad-Hoc Commission 14 Questions dostiovalley 15 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: May 26, 2020 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: [' consent ❑ old business ❑ new business [' public hearing ❑ information ® admin. report [' pending legislation [' executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Update on Tourism Related Venues GOVERNING LEGISLATION: None PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: • March 8, 2016, Council heard a report from Community Attributes, Inc. (CAI) on the Retail Improvement Study, as well as the Tourism Enhancement Study. • August 16, 2016, Council authorized staff to move forward with the analysis of six potential tourism enhancement projects. • November 30, 2016, Council and staff attended a special Council meeting to hear about and discuss the CSL Feasibility Study, the purpose of which was to consider a potential sports complex on land located near the HUB facility, and for potential major enhancements to Spokane County's existing Plante's Ferry Sports Facility. • December 20, 2016, Council heard a report from CAI on an update to the Tourism Enhancement Study, including analysis of the six projects approved by Council as well as the Plante's Ferry expansion and the HUB Complex. • November 17, 2017, Council heard that staff was having CAI perform an analysis on expanding the outdoor venue at CenterPlace in addition to the other projects in the Tourism Enhancement Study. • February 13, 2018 and May 29, 2018, Council heard administrative reports on this topic. • July 10, 2018 Council approved a motion to limit future discussions of this topic to the fairgrounds and stadium district, a sports complex, and CenterPlace west lawn expansion. • August 14, 2018 Council heard an administrative report which went into greater detail on the economic analysis of the fairgrounds and stadium district, a sports complex, and CenterPlace west lawn expansion. • April 9, 2019 Council heard an administrative report that updated Council on the status of the preferred alternatives. • April 23, 2019 Spokane County gave an overview of the proposed renovations to Plante's Ferry Sports Complex BACKGROUND: At the July 10, 2018 meeting, Council approved a motion to narrow the discussion of economic venues and events to the fairgrounds and stadium district, a sports complex, and the CenterPlace west lawn expansion. At the August 14, 2018 meeting, Council discussed financial analysis of these three venues prepared by staff. All three alternatives were again discussed on April 9, 2019 with updates on each proposal. Council gave direction to further study the fairgrounds/stadium district and the sports complex. After the April 23, 2019 presentation from Spokane County on the latest concept for Plante's Ferry, Council indicated a preference for staff to look into two sports complex options, one at Plante's Ferry in cooperation with Spokane County and a City initiated project near the Central Valley School District property at Ridgeline High School in Liberty Lake. The CenterPlace West Lawn expansion was included in the City's the 2020 City budget process and construction will be completed in a few months. Staff engaged Architects West to develop concepts centered around the 2016 study on sports fields completed by Conventions, Sports & Leisure International (CSL) which recommended a twelve triangular field layout and to develop building ideas for the Fairgrounds. Page 1 of 3 As the twelve triangular concepts neared completion last fall, it became apparent that we needed CSL to analyze the new concepts for economic viability. In January 2020, CSL recommended that we focus on eight triangular field layouts as their work was showing that the twelve field configurations would be underutilized for the foreseeable future. The project team revised the concept at Ridgeline High School and Spokane County revised their Plante's Ferry Concept as well. The CSL contract was then amended to include an analysis of these new concepts. Architects West also further developed the Fairgrounds/Stadium Concept and prepared several renderings of a 30,000 square foot new building that would offer entry features, exhibit space, and provisions for restaurant anchor which would act as a catalyst project for the stadium district. This would encourage further investment in the Fairgrounds/Avista Stadium and surrounding properties. Staff will provide Council with an overview of the work performed over the past year and will detail the final concepts for the two sports field concepts and the renderings for the Fairgrounds/Stadium District building. The financial benefits and impacts of each concept will be discussed. Fairgrounds and Stadium District At baseline attendance, the project is estimated to draw an additional 57,600 visitors per year resulting in 8,300 estimated hotel nights. The cost of the project is estimated at $10 million and would require LTGO (limited tax general obligation) bonds in the amount of$7.3 million after the use of $2.7 million in preliminary fund balance in the Hotel/Motel Tax — Tourism Facilities Fund #104 at December 31, 2019. The bond payment would be about $458,000 annually, of which the 1.3% lodging tax could provide an estimated $213,000. The annual net cash outflow from this project is estimated at $195,000 after factoring in revenues and expenses from operations, projected increases Spokane Valley sales taxes from additional visitor spending in the City, the 1.3% lodging tax assumed to pay for the LTGO payment, and the LTGO bond payment. It is noteworthy that if Council chose this option, City Staff would recommend we enter into an Interlocal Agreement (ILA) with Spokane County (County) where the City agrees to provide the County with the proceeds of the 1.3% lodging tax in exchange for the County constructing and operating at the Fairgrounds a multipurpose structure of approximately 30,000 square feet. The ILA would make clear that the City's financial involvement would be limited to turning over the proceeds of the 1.3% lodging tax. It would be Staffs intent that this option require no General Fund financial participation. Plante's Ferry Sports Complex The renovations of this facility were analyzed in the CSL Feasibility Study dated May 15, 2020. Improvements were envisioned for both the softball and rectangular fields. At the second year of operations, which staff is using as a mid-line for potential operating activity, the project is estimated to draw a total of 462,800 visitors per year resulting in 10,712 estimated hotel nights in Spokane Valley. The cost of the project is estimated at $31.7 million split 50% between the City and County. The project would require LTGO bonds in the amount of$29 million after the use of $2.7 million in preliminary fund balance in the Hotel/Motel Tax —Tourism Facilities Fund #104 at December 31, 2019. The bond payment would be about $2.3 million annually with the City's portion being about$1 million, of which the 1.3% lodging tax could provide an estimated $213,000. The annual net cash outflow from this project is estimated at $2.8 million after factoring in revenues and expenses from operations, projected increases of Spokane Valley sales taxes from additional visitor spending in the City, and proceeds from the 1.3% lodging tax assumed to partially pay for the LTGO bond payment. These operating figures are assuming that the complex continues to be a pay to play facility and that fees would be charged for any use of the complex. The County proposes to share in covering the operating losses so the City's share would be approximately $1.2 million. Page 2 of 3 Ridgeline High School Sports Complex The sports complex project is discussed in the CSL Feasibility Study dated May 15, 2020, which envisioned the complex as a pay to play facility rather than a community park — meaning that access to the fields would be limited to paying customers. Proceeds from renting field space for practice and tournaments would be used to partially cover construction, plus operating and maintenance costs. At the second year of operations, which staff is using as a mid-line for potential operating activity, the project is estimated to draw an additional 211,410 visitors per year resulting in 7,361 estimated hotel nights. The cost of the project is estimated at $27.9 million and would require LTGO bonds in the amount of $25.2 million after the use of $2.7 million in preliminary fund balance in the Hotel/Motel Tax—Tourism Facilities Fund #104 at December 31, 2019. The bond payment would be about$2 million annually, of which the 1.3% lodging tax would provide an estimated $213,000. The annual net cash outflow from this project is estimated at $2.4 million after factoring in revenues and expenses from operations, projected increases Spokane Valley sales taxes from additional visitor spending in the City, the 1.3% lodging tax assumed to partially pay for the LTGO payment, and the LTGO bond payment. Again, these operating figures are assuming that the complex is a pay to play facility and that fees would be charged for any use of the complex. OPTIONS: None—discussion only. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: None—discussion only. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: The Hotel/Motel Tax — Tourism Facilities Fund #104 has a preliminary ending fund balance of $2,690,945 at the end of 2019. Revenues in that fund are $420,000 in the 2020 Budget; however, staff currently estimated that the City will collect approximately $213,000 in revenues from the 1.3% lodging tax due to the effects of the COVID- 19 Pandemic and related economic impacts. The current estimate of $213,000 would finance approximately $3,401,500 in bond proceeds for a 30-year bond at a 4.5% interest rate. STAFF CONTACT: John Hohman, Deputy City Manager, Chelsie Taylor, Finance Director ATTACHMENTS: • PowerPoint Presentation • May 2020 CSL Study • Financial Analysis of Fairgrounds and Stadium District o Analysis of potential tourism enhancement o Bond payment calculation o Sales tax increase calculation • Financial Analysis of Plante's Ferry Sports Complex Renovations o Analysis of potential tourism enhancement o Bond payment calculation o Sales tax increase calculation • Financial Analysis of Ridgeline High School Sports Complex o Analysis of potential tourism enhancement o Bond payment calculation o Sales tax increase calculation Page 3 of 3 Economic Analysis of Tourism and Events May 26, 2020 John Hohman, Deputy City Manager Chelsie Taylor, Finance Director Spokane �Va11ey° Retail Improvement Strategy 2015 hired CAI to develop a retail improvement strategy and action plan Analyze Retail Trade Area , demographics, retail demand Identify opportunities for retail growth • Develop strategic work program actions Ca ' attributesty Identified strong connection between retail and tourism A retail improvement strategy action was to explore potential tourism anchors and study those projects Retail Im rove m e ntSt rategy: Trade Capture Primary Trade Area MOTOR VEHICLES AND PARTS 199% Trade capture is relatively strong GENERAL MERCHANDISE 187 ° but lags in tourism CLOTHING AND CLOTHING ACCESSORIES 171% related categories SPORTING GOODS, HOBBY, BOOK, AND MUSIC 153% BUILDING MATERIAL AND GARDEN EQUIPMENT 133% GASOLINE STATIONS 133% MISCELLANEOUS RETAILERS, NON-STORE RETAILERS 120% ELECTRONICS AND APPLIANCE 113% FOOD SERVICES AND DRINKING PLACES 107% FURNITURE AND HOME FURNISHINGS 104% ACCOMMODATION FOOD AND BEVERAGE STORES 91% Data Source Department of Revenue PERFORMING ARTS, SPECTATOR SPORTS 779 Office of Financial Management 67% HELTH 2014 Data,published 2015 ' AND PEROf .A'.L CARE Trade Capture 3 Retail m rovement Strategy: RRetail a es 5t584 $2,039 FOOD SERVICES AND DRINKING PLACES $1,649 $323 I ACCOMMODATION 572 11 Spokane Valley PERFORMING ARTS, SPECTATOR SPORTS 99 $181 $0 S00 $1,000 $1,500 $2,000 $2,500 Taxable Retail Sales Per Capita City lags behind in retail sales per capita in tourism retail sectors Data Source Department of Revenue Office of Financial Management 2014 Data, published 2015 Tourism Strategy • Ca ' community attributes inc Phase I - Existing conditions & development of strategies Phase II - Technical evaluation of strategies Phase III - Implementation ( Projects) Phase I : Engagement with TIndustry . 0 - - I _ __ , ,. ,_...m . 4 Conducted interviews with stakeholders _ 9 iii,,,r, .1'lj - -_,,,,_- Developed a survey to identify •1- ...Ilia, ___L, . . opportunities and challengeslir - ---- , • is. 7 Convened workshops ,,,,, ,_,_ .----1`40 -' 'N .--• - - 1st workshop: develop strategies and i ; - - identif potential investments/projects r Y /p jects 0. . 2nd workshop: review goals, strategies and • select projects for further study ‘41;47.- 1pihr, i .1 Phase I : Existing Conditions & Strategy Development Inventoried and profiled key tourism assets in the City Special events, lodging facilities, retail and dining destinations, convention, recreation, sports Identified strengths and deficits in tourism based on regional and local spending on tourism activities Compiled case studies of tourism investments Initial investment, ongoing operational costs, impact on tourism Developed a list of potential strategies or investments with stakeholder input Phase II : Investment Opportunities and Strategies Funded by Lodging Tax Advisory Committee ( LTAC) Study feasibility of projects identified in Phase Evaluated strategies for potential investment Whitewater and Waterfront Park Trail Development and Public Art Fairgrounds and Stadium District Balfour Park Redevelopment Special Events (CenterPlace supplemental) Arts and Entertainment Venue Sports Complex (Spokane County - 2016 Conventions, Sports & Leisure International Study) Phase II : Investment Opportunities and Strategies Analyzed the economic feasibility of each strategy: Market opportunity Potential development costs Operational challenges and other anticipated barriers Analyzed the project economic impacts and return on investment: Projected operational revenues (e.g. ticket sales) Direct fiscal impacts (e.g. retail sales tax, property tax, lodging tax) Ability to become self-sustainable Phase III - Current Tourism Projects Fairgrounds and Stadium District 2 concepts Outdoor Sports Complex Plantes Ferry — 2 concepts Ridgeline High School — 2 concepts ■ CenterPlace West Lawn Expansion — Funded as part of the 2020 budget and currently under construction Work Since Last Discussion _r_ Staff engaged Architects West to develop concepts, renderings, and/or cost estimates for the Fairgrounds, East Valley School District/Tupper property, and Ridgeline High School property Coordinated with private property owners, East Valley and Central Valley School Districts on various concepts Spokane County developed revised Plante's Ferry concepts Reengaged Conventions, Sports & Leisure International (CSL) to analyze new concepts as a follow up to their 2016 study Fairgrounds/Stadium District - Why Increase market share in event hosting Need for renovation or replacement of existing facility Capitalize on existing visitors to the Fair and Expo Center and Stadium Capture existing demand in winter Spokane County will maintain and operate new facility Create a multifaceted stadium or entertainment district . • • Fairgrounds/Stadium District icinity MaJMIL. 11 11 11 11.. --I , I_ .' :_.. •, A ii. ,..wilia_.. 1 . - ---)- -1 i Jl&._ ' fr: HUS -r_ "" - —`- ©C' '1 LSA .. 7- P ; Re Pasadena I sports rr d ~-� � Trentwood A : . .Ar'+ i k t p0 a/79 fRive. Y w �' s\------ 0G- ftrtk 2L: C II. • Millwood ' -I— 8 Il - 0 r Municipal a ' - ma e ,�_' Airport , i — a Centerplace -- - r ___ Ccillt or _ Orchard Ave - ��61{ t• - -0 Indisna.AYo _ 1, - — =� n _ - —E Ni,ssion.Ave- - t- -- -- iE-Mlsslo,,.A Vy it f td / /1fl . �\ �t I 'III ' x 1 �� k.' ., a! ,. Fairgrounds I l�� 1 L=-� • 0 ' ro -E Broadwa Avje[Z--- - �Ya M 41I __ Z Y v-- {- j 1 ig. l�.[' c, fry^r "' "E `�-�11 IM1Broadwa Aver E-Broadwa kAvc -- _ - 21 rr- �.;_ Esprag ue•Ave — - Dlshmari- gE r' A;0 Spokaneva,u9 — ---'Veradale- - '. �/ a ' 9 Va!leypPortunity '• b 1a. - i 1 M=Imillillii=Maiir— Y__ } F g�_� I,y City Hall i ...tiim --' imil! �.�.- 1 a 2 — -- Dishman G 3 Q �� weal LL : f rte'• •. rlat*ralark0 Jt' �-alt �= � _ �`1 _ 1 f. 1 E 16ihAvc ma ��Z ,J i. ;, l Jnr mini , e mi is • r_ ` . {iID ��N�Lr y3"''P' �� ma�yr}}'' . . • - - . ` E 32nd,tet. aadatI�E'•31 it �. @ a Y I -. ! ~ - \�• i � ,` ^ Conservation it ` l:� -.® • dn�..�q rb \ >1 ' r. 4 ' 13 Fairgrounds/Stadium District - Details 30,000 sf addition/ new structure One concept connects to existing fairgrounds structures, the other is separated from existing structures Architect analyzed many alternatives and potential locations within the site $ 10 million estimated cost $8 million from COSV based on lodging tax revenue Anything exceeding $8m would be Spokane County's responsibility Fairgrounds/stadium District _ Details g• ,., • 111111,-- , , . _ _. ... ,..___ IT _ __ e7„,......._____ . 7•• a 27.77::.-. . .iiii>' ''. .i. 41 ".7- Er . -"•:.. , - - --- --.. 77-;'-' ... . . . ,..-. _ _-- , - , ....., r. 7i '-'"-" -,. - i- -., "I''- . 7--- " in iii ..,., II. --'",. --414r r f, 2 •- :-In'' 1 z .,, - [p •, • , / ,,, . • r7 . . , -.r t”;rit o. e•;, ;..--.: ,._ „...„. ....., 1---- - I r l' -• - --elprei smisr ex.,. i-----r-'-- : , -'r 4- .,,:. IL. P• i ._. r ifJi,g . 1, ...,. 4- R , , ' i _ -7_7' g _ . . . , • .0.,i '--- I -- ==- ---, .".1 Node ..:.— - - - • --r-: -..-: ;_ F.-, ;7 -• -- c *At*, 41, ,.., - - .;, •,-_ - --... i,, r - - -, ;tr= .c.- --' -t _.,,d , ";, - i t,-.--' 4' 4S, t, 4IP 0 0 0• r- #' f" #^ ... .=' :' .. , .,-..,--, di ,ii• p'-• --' - - _ .__ _ . , ... • a - 1 ,_.„.,_______-----_, , , , u 1-. --., -• ,. , ,,, 1:.-- - - •. -' -,.• .- -- v tt..„, , - . V , .., '', . ...; 4i...,--lj- -• -------,_=,-,-._ _ , ,;.1 ._,. . _,... . • . , , . „,, t.. .,, .--„- .--..___.•-_-- . 1 „I . 14 ' I - j •.' r_.,* / , - .... --:- i- j 1.1 , :. • ,•_,,.7--.. ‘ . 1, ...:,-.',,r , 1 . ..., .—, _, •, ' li 1 2 . ... . A-•''- i52271' . f• ..-.---, ' r' 4 ; • e -, _ , 1--1'..— 7 P-- - - • '7. --,-;,;_ I 2-1,-.-2-2 2,."-ie, 'Co • . _2. ,• e'214,,,.'•..'2.,.,”,...,_:1 '.1. ... j "1-, -. '- . . -...' .., .. :-..--. -... .\ e 1 ='.7 7- 7:2-. -,,-.' ,•2-'-'-. . - IP ta '- ,- -,.--- -,,•:. : i. . 0 - .... i , p. ,,.. ,... . k ...... _ .0. ,7' -_ - , •## re' Views In j .,.- 0 ;°'. I ,:te - •T` ' - -4- 1 . .. I -0'4 0° 0 0-0 Pedestrian Connection 1 . _,• . ._ fr,4c1.;1, : ! Os° NODE OPTION - CONNECTIVITY - , _ • • i Fairgrounds/Stadium District - et.. ___. ,__ , , ,, _,.. ......... .f., ........: , r— ,7-'—',,,' . . as .�--- .-, -` it i ,339438 o .1 --j- „ ,-4:,i �.. e Connected : „,a �� _ r Al J _ r111�1�1 } J 1 ^ Y ' ,.1114(1 ly — #W4'J Yv� _ i{pp A1111• 5111��11� L J A _. 0,`4J' . i ';;t1,111, �1�1 L l” 546 I y • Prre ' —---NI ' -P-z•-,,, ,,, - - --,-;-•c' __;.,-_,- _ t .r' - t,•,�os, �,r- r ,,,, ter. — _ - -— --- - - . 11111 - • I A. Alle a-�sr Fairgrounds/stadium District - Connected . _ .11 . 0 1. A4.4 i.04144 4 , . IP. +s Sly , 4 1 - 'Ibfatifidg&EXPO CENTE-:- 1 .-.- --- , r ,.. SPOKANE COUNTY l orm m.. „ii m low mimmoommmmwm RA" . 11 immemigokm, t Ems immtir. MI I= NM MI NM _glitaW, a_s oil. ,kw., _____, .....„•,..._41441... ce ;111-__),.. ,•!le-, Ili ' (. J-„, =1=1 421U)a-1-.. ,e,' -m- es_.....k ii-...) 4 _ . I 0 i IMMIM I a NM iliMia meir•ri. i. EFT it — gi•-• — ...5 --- 1 1 ,..., ___,_ _ -,emilliMINIF .'-7.11.1F- — 17 Fairgrounds/Stadium• - on td h T - -,»s 3� 1IP , - - - Eno NI MI I IME 11,1,..111Mrior 1,ji:,'"ioNn• I • II Mier... _ _ A J.-41411 i I i 18 a ■ r roun s to iumDistrict - Connected ,,„ _________ ,=_.,,_ ~'� q_N_ C ______ II ■all MO Irr 1111111 "-cr • am1 _ lir ti _� - i, WO I, S� `1.j.4 rtk.: L, '',. 7.1'' loom , --mac,. _ ,i Y t-� /y 'i... Fairgrounds/Stadium• - on td' , INI.,I +.44 lum ism. r ry ' ,0°11' '_Al ._ iiim ii eft ....111111111111111111110 4 // '. %Hi r , , ,.„, __ ,. ,_ ..,... ..,_. _ _ .. ..__......, , , _ , -'.111111111PlirrAWIF‘r - -,..... ,_,. _,..,.- ---- --- _ -. .„.. -.. . _ _ _ m, '. ' ' - --_--- _ ____ - . __ _ ,_ , , __.,_ /le ‘ -- ------- -.... 011.# ' leilli iff...., Air ,fir, . '�. . �Ilinftivamil � , , ■ ■Fairgrounds/Stadium District - Connected --. .. .. ._ _ pi SP©KAN' �' OUNTY lalelli_ _ -Mg - - BAR AND GRILL j -- - 1 IIIIb dill 4.k4' ft AL '!' .' tai lia liimis ■ lig li a ■Fairgrounds/StadiumDistrict - Details - i .,.. ,_.... ,. ,i9, _,.......„. ..r., .........., =,.....„ ..r,....1. ,:i.„ . q . ...„.rt, yD Wyk 'a „ .� Y Separated _ ti'7� !1111 6 _ \.:'11.,'"','-',.,‘'40.--'- ,11111 . A —��r_.�._._ �i,,‘,. r t,' 11`)111 L4 {y ,w. .;r RI F __ m _-- � s bllf! ..0 �� a �• `.. "' _ 1111!!!, J , ........-,,,,; , '--LI,--____.;1.--g%------........--:-,,..--.----_---s--:;',. 'I ' -;II‘j.' .7::' -::49.:1'41 : : . ,— JA, IP - ' _ ._ti gin • r - .cm ti""` amu ' �' - . 1! `, 4 . IDL, .N.. -: _ : • r sem. . - - '-iia_ 4, -.. as- :_, .-_u.- _�_ . a',�„.._. la _ { F ti 4 W41 . i . u 13.,_..�1. r y lir ��,, �,9 4aa m .r:a., _ X � i. .- ° € ' - ' -1'''7'- 2i2-±f. ®y - a . ` ia.,.. s - - . _ ■ ■Fairgrounds/Stadium District - separated opactorrot-,. -----,1 A . --- ..., , .rit- , pow .. _ r t ______________________. ,----- ., .. ,, ,,,,- _____„. ____ . .,.„. . , , ..„. I . . . ....... ___....... 0.----7411 ... . . ,... , ,. ,..,....„ ,,__ __ _ . . f . , 0,r-o ,, , , , �' �' wr s i • IQ1 l '...— 1 _ —_. . eip ___________ ________________________________ 23 ■ ■Fairgrounds/Stadium District - separated _ _�.' ' - p CANTER r� I 1—p —+ — �' c - , , , , 1 i , - IR AND_____ _Ex �� mi r , ill i yy .: i . -w`i sa, �fll� ar - -� c, kki, }' •^..�!�� l ib o" �— — _ — - ,i e F P , sib " , ! -- ♦ +X h h4 .* ,';''4',,,` , nd 41 J,,Ir .,il ,,...4,.!.;,°rS tV rP _... s ,1111. 24 Fairgrounds/Stadium District _ separated : , _, .7. ,... ___ __ ,......„ ...r ......I I _ ir 1 1 I V mg _ Aqui I. ' --. ='.y j • .� _ . _ 4jinn 25 Fairgrounds/stadium District - separated IIPI i ........, , , ,,a, - - 1 j'401111 1 1111111 17 '.1 ' 1 1 i , 17 1771 rfirirrilp 7, r I I 1' il i linTintr I nillmma.- --..atvikeiCil rlr, ,,,icip, = i irinii ;rir , ... - i- - •. nra ra\ -4.1 i i -'1 Ir 1:r rer,v•- _ A--..--,. raL, - --"•-•<..„. 1 IL r gi: ''''' - TnilL__ -- •-• --- & - 1 ____ ,....._ .-- ,.. , . . , - __- _ - - _ air roue s to iumDistrict - separated . , , ,i , j„l;u I , ,, it . , 1 . . E• ' ,,,, t. . , , , , ,,,,,....,.,,,,. ., _ _, . . t- 11.11 ' 1511.111.11X1P3M9M '' 7 ill ' 1 i'1 1,,., , - - nr=,,-giriallimmit i,',. •:% .:•.,'.`,,"•: . ' 1i,___ 7 -4_,_z4:.:!•,,, , ...1,_ imam— , ' ——— ,1 Ili e r tlil z_..� . _ r • M it, lc ,......„: ,, 1/ F',, ' ill t d ,, Al -ff1, .;. Is ' - r� I - it:,1... r17, ..I ..., ,4 • '": 1• ��' fir..:..5� f - Vit' r -F'r -ikt. t Y •-'. ,i r1� �...ciit �,]] )r -. ...i �. � .. w \..--;-'i,::::. }"::':',....V . 3� ,Y4 .� Fairgrounds/Stadium District _ separated . . . _ . _ ,_ „ .. ..,_. ,, , . LI ,._. ,_ __ .. . _ _ ,_ : . , -4,, ...1 ,. , . , ,....„__.._ , ... r 7� 1 Fairgrounds/Stadium District - separated __,-- _ . --ww.:....„- ..........,, _ ,,,,.• _..... ..„.......-----,__--. R , , ...------- ........ 1 _., , . . , : . -...: ,. . ,, . ,. ------------------------ ____________----;------____________ , .. .....,.„..„.4,7._ , r--. 1 i 2 ii 11 I II 1 ill 1 i 1 11 0 r(„ ex.. :.c.,:.‘, . .. OEN\ ''''' -' • •'- t ' I I:• illIt ipli , i N i 1 -- -,1--- - ,:.4 ''. `" , . . -, ,-,,.. : ...„_. .. ' — -. — ' .' -'' ‘-.......:".' -.,,; .,,. , 1..,e„,4 7,P./.:::. , we - . ------ mrc: ------------- —_____ ..' LL__ ,....2. .„,__. Iii LI I law L..... ._._ _. . . 1 ill _____ ___-_. .______._,, . . 29 Fairgrounds/stadium District - separated ,. . , __=____:_:_. --.4 1 awrzomern11116.,.. ,..i_ _ II il 1 .. ...... m.„1 „..r. : . ran'AND EX 7 0 , . , I ..._.-Ig. :.-. .F .7.7 hi 1 . .- ST 1 ------ ------------ ------------ ------------ IMMIMMIR.' CENTER )Ell f1111111Ill p, mil II 11111— I . ,..,1 BiLi 4 0 olicimul "iik I 1 W. III ri,.. ......, ansillin' _- _ ',I'• ,...7'7:7----''-• — It' 'Ma' .4110h -41, . ...-r_._,....:,.'..... _ glIMPI ___.-- — • , ...z.,?...41$1 k.-;.::-,y;',',,V. n'',,,,,. ',,'W,',. .------- ---...-----___________ ----____ -------------- - , 40000000roP .1111e.--_____._..... ............................_ Fairgrounds - Financial Analysis Total Attendance Da s Low Baseline High Visitors Total Visitors ' 28,000 57,600 86,400 Estimated Hotel Room Nights (2) 8,300 Capital Costs Mid-Range Capital Costs $ 10,000,000 $ 10,000,000 $ 10,000,000 Less: Preliminary Fund #104 @ 12/31/19 (3) $ (2,690,945) $ (2,690,945) $ (2,690,945) Remaining capital cost to finance $ 7,309,055 $ 7,309,055 $ 7,309,055 LTGO bond payment $ 457,688 $ 457,688 $ 457,688 - 30-year bond @ 4.5%, issue costs @ 2% - 1.3% lodging tax may provide up to $213,000 annually for the payment Values for number of visitors, capital costs, operating revenues, operating expenses, estimated visitor spending in the City, and number of jobs created was taken directly from the CAI report pg. 61. However, the capital cost has been increased due to estimated inflation. (2) Not calculated. _ 31 (3) December 31, 2019 fund balance is preliminary and unaudited as of May 26, 2020. ■ ■ ■Fairgrounds - Financial Analysiscontinued Total Attendance Da s ah, Low + Baseline High Analysis of Annual Activity Annual cash inflows - Operating revenues $ 230,400 $ 460,800 $ 691 ,200 - 1 .3% COSV lodging tax $ 213,000 _ $ 213,000 $ 213,000 - Estimated increase in sales tax collections $ 16,779 $ 33,558 $ 50,320 $ 460,179 $ 707,358 $ 954,520 Annual cash outflows - Operating expenses ` $ 445,000 $ 445,000 $ 445,000 - Bond payment $ 457,688 $ 457,688 $ 457,688 $ 902,688 $ 902,688 $ 902,688 Annual net cash inflow (outflow) $ (442,509) $ (195,330) $ 51,832 Analysis of Other Economic Impacts Estimated visitor spending in the City ` ;' $ 1 ,974,000 $ 3,948,000 $ 5,920,000 - Corresponding increase in sales tax $ 16,779 $ 33,558 $ 50,320 Values for number of visitors, capital costs, operating revenues, operating expenses, estimated visitor spending in the City, and number of jobs created was taken directly from the CAI report pg. 61. However, the capital cost has been increased due to estimated inflation. Fairgrounds - Financial Analysis , continued If this option were chosen by Council , Staff recommends development of an Interlocal Agreement: Where the City agrees to provide Spokane County with the proceeds of the 1.3% lodging tax and that this would be the sole extent of the City's financial involvement. Spokane County agrees to construct, operate and own at the Fairgrounds a multipurpose facility of approximately 30,000 square feet. This option would require no City General Fund financial participation . Sports Complex - Why The 2016 CSL study noted high demand among local and non-local softball and baseball leagues, clubs and tournament producers Enhanced sports and recreation opportunities Reduce the need for residents to leave the region for sports Synergy with the other sports, recreation , entertainment and leisure facilities leading to increased tourism activity Enhanced community pride, self-image, exposure and reputation Improved regional exposure 2016 oits om ex stu - Details 12 tournament softball fields were recommended in the 2016 CSL study Site requirements i x 48 to 72-acre site X44. ;I I I i 1 e "Y 4t 6 acres per field .616 ,.t{ IVB 1 75 parking spaces per field ° L• bin �- tih. ° � { s �� it. 1 a L • . I� -. 41� +w� 1: 0. I R Y• tii' • . k• le, JI] Lie • ti 4.° 7 r 4 k.17 ti1.tiL • lil v. i" .• .. 1 ti I $ 1.-�•I.AY.%NI ice' • y, 1 I• 0. r • ° I a I_ p+n • 4 i1 ° in r I 1 0. r = _. 35 2016 Sports Complex (CSL study) - Details The 2016 CSL study envisions the Sports Complex as a " Pay to Play" facility rather than a community park, meaning that access to fields would be limited to paying customers. Proceeds from renting field space for practice and tournaments would be used to partially cover construction plus operating and maintenance costs. Concept 12019 Modified Plante 's Ferry/ EVSD 12 field proposal Upgrade 5 existing PF fields Develop 4 new fields on property west of the existing alignment for Progress Road north of Wellesley Avenue and bordered by the new Bigelow Gulch connector to be constructed by Spokane County. Utilize 3 new fields to be constructed by East Valley School District piante7s Ferry/ Evsp Concept vicinity map r Nitr F. i V r '7' • diet - t , ' f TU p per/EVS D, , ,,Lictl.,,, •,, i ' I',:36.. - P I a nte's Ferry ( nom=Eaca Pasadena 77 Allizificettly 01.7..) --'s 1, ,, ' Trentwood Pan ..,. =. 1_,122,14,g _ __ pir, 21:°8 , '-'. SP04. AR., ...).-' ---Al H i lyr.„ ,The RfvPr ,o, ----:"-----" 4, ii - -- li' •• IP Ira - MIllii6OCC - -- 1--- ' — .,,...-- i. 2p11r)4, E.7. 0Centerplace r iataSi°' ,•-,a.....--•` ' 1 - ' .. 16 I - . II MUM 1_4 • ana."----..„ / - _, .. . • '''S T r_...• " itati.itucix) 1,,TJ.r A IatTikrik.. , , r --- _a .__ Priln i i ' - z- . .... _ , _ I , 3 !-L-H-Ori 1 '' illi- I [—HI r__Li 1 1- ' ._ E , i i i (1 . q- Is .,.------ FA = pl NE--reca'Er/Mow,,-,- P uacor_Lrx al) i06 -.----- d-- r- ' 1_1 --- , . I -I-7 11 0 - , r —1 - gir . Spoltane — Celltiald gerirr-,cLAM INtileaflp an:11MM MP =Opportunity INCIE City Hail ._ , H 4 . .•- • , -‘4m--. inumirm.-48 k 4 A 111111NI an 11/1 Mt j E3 , D shman Mb, 3mmi 0 VITT/A a6Cn . , N >--r ' E EiNIM I i __1 -4 -r ' 7' --1- , ' E 116th-Ara =_ I=rill 4-4 , 1111 -;, r . 1- / ,... • t-, rj..- 7-, LL-'-r.Li ,,1_, 1 ,- _ , ' I )-=on ; - ..-41 ,,,.. —r, .1 i— • , \,.._., IT \limno r ' , At , , - wr . . ,, \ im r--,,,l---4, IV Arm \\\;i :----1 , 14,i _ ../, mows* f , t J ,-, , ,r 41..... IIP \ 1-gitm,. .....p ii-- Maui iv ---f.' :: . z• ' t 4` 640 .0, .;,.. ..griee ' ". .. ,r k -.. i-,-F i , I lho. I , ,, l l , mr r , .---mw_ ._ i .._,,.. , . , map ,•r- ) ' re I-• 1* . in DetailedConce t12019Plante 'sFerrY EVSD Layout EAST VALLEY S.D./TLPPER ---------------=---------::::----- S', Proposed Site Concept ,::,,., , ,-- -- '" `tea � er :.;' \.:". ' �' ' 7- fib. • i -.1r...Ti �j'l w▪t`s 41 .44,10,_ i r'kit - 1N ‘ \le'''." r p• n c ._ - . -''' *1-' ' ' .,,,::: ..-',..'',$;':' ' ---"" --‘,.. ti • w . ...` .1e... ul ti . ,tar ' sf . \ I 7-2 A - l a'3 ', .I '' E 4105 � y MDII L.-. _czy ...a .,4 ,.. - ,..., - :.• ..,,, :41 N I 116 _ G ar A, ArchitectsWew. on Ridgeline High School Concept Vicinity Map _. ._ ...,, ,_ IMP . vos......•-,-.- Hutton _. -- @CDd0A II --,-. . - ..P.A., . ---i . - ur: -1 .• '-- Pasadena;inn .....1., sp Of i8 gitatal' .--r-i-r---',- ' 1 Velo _ , . •- - - . 4N.v--- --'-'--- i . • , _ -, ,. „ ,• am. .-.,.1,rr-'-- I. - • __ L 1 ' . <-,--.'''' • -- - , :'''''' 1 . .-.- - ,1! iiimL ''• ” Nolill . aocl ' -1.-..,- _- _, 8 mi... ,• ., -.1 , - _..--Af - . . • - •• - II .....',,,,,,,c,*,-.... •---,•-‘ -_ 1 *,.,ellt-,,, a ...„., „ ,‘„, ...D.,„._ , --- ,, . oCenterplace . _ :,_ - .. ,,_.__..---- i S•o ane ,......a ,Wg -''''' ' 1 ean Pean:4•I'a I aii ...-- - Av. , ---- ,- - -I 4 ' -E IndlanalAY,''.- - .. - . . ------ , . _ .. . • 4 ---:-' - 4-'- 1- ---- -- 1r-;: " . \‘'‘,, -- -- ..--7—:.---- --.---- - -- _ __. .. --0 m Ise i on.A - - - 1_1_'-' - - ---- .111itimi ,., -W° 7. •-' L_L__ 411111*.' .._., .2 . •- illill fillilir _- 1 _.,-__ -,. • A m ma- --- •• -a iikm r_.' _ 141 IF, r7 ,_ ----- -. . 1 M Li ii.F. ._.Brond ay/$50 . L _ I.-. 31k; -,-m--1=1:i Broad'm AC 7 ------------- --ii iii '.'... -. --"- MR AM a , --•- , —_i ___-,_4i,i-..11 —1- FRI' - 7- -- , -4 Nip. 11. lig._.__-- . , G P'9°6 . . - - 1 • - . ' • -• - - r • , .-.... ' - ,•---3,,-1 , -j- Di sh m a n Li MC.' r.'Icc a keipportun ty _ Veradal a Greenacres __,. - _ -•-.,__ _ 01) r , , -, , WitGri .i 1J r- ' Central Valley City Hall 1.s- 7-- - .. -. N. -- -` ,.• ' - t_ -'7'04- i 1 1 . „ , ME 1E Ell In _ 1, OE' '''' ..-73-1 _ li'-1—.1111. diFFS' -.7 :01VrilifW l' ': . II -,-. -- - - eD -__ M ._. • III , - I-1 . , ; 7 Cri=h en Ma: • ,, -,g, -, --- , - - . I . , ..- . WEI.VBEFAm -. 'V ---_ 1--T- -— Uplands -. -7=-1-'‘,.i z;---'-- -----4.:---4-1.T\ - , -i- ,---.,..j. . m.ift aaccoulaz& ,...,.... . r- - - -14-1-6---,-i . r a a • N,,- Al 1 1 v... ec _ :., ; --,j,._.. -- , :177-) ---, : - _1. II-I-I `"4- `. ) . - _ Area _.- 7 ''' \-4 ---1-11-- ----=-77.4 \ -- '1*.- • I 1-"T-i ' - ' '' ' - - " • '•(''-' ' • • ''• i r .c-i \r'= 11111111111ffr - f --' - . ' ' - ' - .. . .. ,• '• , •. ' ..,, 44 :a .... .. 1M NM 414 II ,, a 0' . • * : 4: , .7 4 , .•• - - • . .. . ''''', .-- , - 3. t."..ii mil II AO ,. ,;-,, -a .1 •; --• 1, •, _ ,, . , • • ,•• ---w. ---; ' , .. . —El.:1:27arevileW- • i Air . . .4• ••.• -lir ' - . -.11.•. . 1... '' ,,,,+ ' 1 ' '4 SP- _iitskiiitisr '' ' r--r i—C:e' ./7-—: ! ' ilk: ,,,, !, r.,: •411-- . ,:,i, .. , onservation"0 • ..„,,. ,,'• , • _ AM;'.: '.- .• •,. ••:•• . . -.4. - * .It . r: '1. • alt. _ammomMli • once t2 2019 R • dge � neH • gh s . _ . . . ... ,...w. a k►4.!,-aAi .,,,.._.. 744 -- ..._ _ .. _. .. ------------ - r - - ----,-..-;--.-_.._ T 1 12 Field Concept j . . � � • .' ' _- Y I 10 field proposal • _. on 60 acres for Y b6 � x -----_� -__t-...- - r �. .L. —� p ,_,,,,t,,____, (,_._. —_,,---1. i �{` 1 J'�-J AL-.°� Q'....� f-. + _ -- _-- n sale by CVSD — ,, � � -� - -- . - • 2 fields available r,. ' 111,111 Nib F .? , r 5l t at CVS D sf� � �5 ."0rie I _ -__ g R 1 Ridgeline HS .. ... \ ._�. i "� `.crI._ •� g ,+ '4K'* rt 1 e I' 'i; Il i! ti tr �y a ,.:_•,-cr,„,. .„,,ip. ..j y„ 1.,. .. ,., .,, N\ it. r — . f: \,\,,, d• :01._ _ _• ,\ ;ft L_ iir,- ,. \H 1 „.„,” :, sc .. CENTRAL VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL _ ire sil 1 ,. ,._.� ,_ .... - Site Concept . , r t i` le--I` 4 ''# _ r 2020 CSL Study Findings Preliminary economic studies of the 2019 Plante's Ferry and 2019 Ridgeline HS concepts showed that a 12 triangular field facility would be underutilized for the foreseeable future Work began on developing concepts with 8 triangular fields to improve the economic viability of the proposals Concept_3 2020 antes Ferry 1 L . . . . yr- 4,,i ` • Developed by Spokane County jAk 4,,/,‘„) • Consolidate 8 triangle fields at existing PF property 4 r * _ f • Rectangular fields would be - `_i pA I� reduced from 13 to 10, J regraded, and artificial turf 4f. =‘'), .__,---- -1 RI <'' '' A, , installed on 4 • Upgraded internal access and ' � pg , increased parking R „=, • Upgraded SR 290 Trent access .� Mil" Mil.rolla - IF-Mi ri,. so : \ r el b.d. 1 Ni. _ A _ _ , , �� 43 Concept 3 Plante 's Ferry - Financial na sus Year 2 Allocation between Spokane Mir Year of Operation - Range of Operation County CoSV + Tota Year 1 Year 2 Year 4 Visitors Total Visitors 390,750 462,800 583,768 Estimated Hotel Room Nights 7,872 10,712 15,488 Capital Costs Mid-Range Capital Costs $ 31 ,663,000 $ 31 ,663,000 $ 31 ,663,000 $ 15,831,500 $ 15,831,500 $ 31 ,663,000 Less: I Preliminary Fund #104 @ 12/31/19 $ (2,690,945) $ (2,690,945) $ (2,690,945) $ - $ (2,690,945) $ (2,690,945) Remaining capital cost to finance $ 28,972,055 $ 28,972,055 $ 28,972,055 $ 15,831,500 $ 13,140,555 $ 28,972,055 LTGO bond payment $ 2,271 ,805 $ 2,271 ,805 $ 2,271 ,805 $ 1 ,241 ,406 $ 1 ,030,399 $ 2,271 ,805 - 20-year bond @ 4.5%, issue costs @ 2% - 1.3% lodging tax may provide up to $213,000 annually for the payment � Values for number of visitors, capital costs, operating revenues, operating expenses, estimated visitor spending in the City, and number of jobs created was taken directly from the CSL report dated 05/15/20 pgs. 32, 33 and 34. December 31, 2019 fund balance is preliminary and unaudited as of May 26, 2020. Concept 3 Plante 's Ferry - Financial Analysis, continued Year 2 Allocation between Spokane Year of Operation - Range of Operation County CoSV _ Total Year 1 Year 2 Year 4 - Analysis of Annual Activity Annual cash inflows - Operating revenues $ 1 ,388,500 $ 1 ,659,390 $ 2,241 ,735 $ 829,695 $ 829,695 $ 1 ,659,390 - 1 .3% COSV lodging tax $ 213,000 $ 213,000 $ 213,000 $ - $ 213,000 $ 213,000 - Estimated increase in sales tax collections $ 61 ,912 $ 83,637 $ 125,484 $ - $ 83,637 $ 83,637 $ 1 ,663,412 $ 1 ,956,027 $ 2,580,219 $ 829,695 $ 1 ,126,332 $ 1 ,956,027 Annual cash outflows - Operating expenses (1) _ $ 2,375,340 $ 2,510,596 $ 2,955,212 $ 1 ,255,298 $ 1 ,255,298 $ 2,510,596 - Bond payment $ 2,271 ,805 $ 2,271 ,805 $ 2,271 ,805 $ 1 ,241 ,406 $ 1 ,030,399 $ 2,271 ,805 $ 4,647,145 $ 4,782,401 $ 5,227,017 $ 2,496,704 $ 2,285,697 $ 4,782,401 Annual net cash inflow (outflow) $ (2,983,733) $ (2,826,374) $ (2,646,798) $ (1,667,009) $ (1,159,365) $ (2,826,374) Analysis of Other Economic Impacts Estimated visitor spending in the City $ 7,283,779 $ 9,839,674 $ 14,762,870 - Corresponding increase in sales tax $ 61 ,912 $ 83,637 $ 125,484 Values for number of visitors, capital costs, operating revenues, operating expenses, estimated visitor spending in the City, and number of jobs created was taken directly from the CSL report dated 05/15/20 pgs. 32, 33 and 34. R vi Ri lin Hi h h l Concept e se e e c o0. . . mac.. .. _am IPP/ - — - — - I90 �_�--- I1' _r 8 field Concept „ __ _ 1 - _ Arranged in preferred • , , _ " pinwheel " layout s ,„ f E— n n n n n r r with central , 0—E U II High School L _..•., _ - I Central Valley `I ,_, ._. . r'.-' , 1' concessions .--'::'''' r __,..„ .. -y_ — t .:_ f-1= Te ,,,,,t , ._,,---, Main entrance on -,�_ 5: \.......-",---.\\ ' : ' - 7. Sprague Ave ;Ail€ 7 "{ _, L /7 I _ 1 *.I lift. __ ; f'.----4 _.1 I �.__1-' \ —. -- 1t y a p ' CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY r<. *F' ' • ' ' I 11I DOUBLE QUAD- SOFTBALL PARK CONCEPT F' o'er.- fr. 7 , - E.SPRAGLPEAVE, Air Ar{chitect5'"IIVest �_ ,p _ f Y' FEBRUARY 2020 46 Concept 4 2020 Ridgeline High School - Financial Analysis Year of Operation - Range of Operation Year 1 Year 2 Year 4 Visitors Total Visitors 152,320 211 ,410 292,540 Estimated Hotel Room Nights (1) I 4,603 7,361 11 ,097 Capital Costs Mid-Range Capital Costs 14 $ 27,870,000 _ $ 27,870,000 $ 27,870,000 Less: Preliminary Fund #104 @ 12/31 /19 $ (2,690,945) $ (2,690,945) $ (2,690,945) Remaining capital cost to finance $ 25, 179,055 $ 25, 179,055 $ 25, 179,055 LTGO bond payment $ 1 ,974,382 $ 1 ,974,382 $ 1 ,974,382 - 20-year bond @ 4.5%, issue costs @ 2% - 1.3% lodging tax may provide up to $213,000 annually for the payment Values for number of visitors, capital costs, operating revenues, operating expenses, estimated visitor spending in the City, and number of jobs created was taken directly from the CSL report dated 5/15/20 pgs. 32, 33 and 34. December 31, 2019 fund balance is preliminary and unaudited as of May 26, 2020. Concept 4 2020 Ridgeline High School - Financial Analysis, cont Year of Operation - Range of Operation Year 1 Year 2 Year 4 Analysis of Annual Activity Annual cash inflows - Operating revenues $ 676,500 $ 885,490 $ 1 ,312,425 - 1 .3% COSV lodging tax $ 213,000 $ 213,000 $ 213,000 - Estimated increase in sales tax collections $ 33,907 $ 53,911 $ 85,368 $ 923,407 $ 1 ,152,401 $ 1 ,610,793 Annual cash outflows _ - Operating expenses $ 1 ,448,640 $ 1 ,543,096 _ $ 1 ,807,912 - Bond payment $ 1 ,974,382 $ 1 ,974,382 ' $ 1 ,974,382 $ 3,423,022 $ 3,517,478 $ 3,782,294 Annual net cash inflow (outflow) $ (2,499,615) $ (2,365,077) $ (2,171 ,501) Analysis of Other Economic Impacts Estimated visitor spending in the City ` $ 3,989,062 $ 6,342,456 $ 10,043,256 - Corresponding increase in sales tax $ 33,907 $ 53,911 $ 85,368 (1) Values for number of visitors, capital costs, operating revenues, operating expenses, estimated visitor spending in the City, and number of jobs created was taken directly from the CSL report dated 5/15/20 pgs. 32, 33 and 34. Next Steps • As determined by City Council H:\Tourism Study Info and Analysis\2020 05 26 Admin Report\Analysis for Fairgrounds RH Sportsplex CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 3/25/2019 5/15/2020 Analysis of Potential Tourism Enhancements 1/21/2020 5/19/2020 Fairgrounds Redevelopment Total Attendance Ila s Low I Baseline I High Visitors Total Visitors (1) 28,000 57,600 86,400 Estimated Hotel Room Nights (1) (2) 8,300 (2) Capital Costs Mid-Range Capital Costs (1) $ 10,000,000 $ 10,000,000 $ 10,000,000 Less: Preliminary Fund#104 @ 12/31/19 (3) $ (2,690,945) $ (2,690,945) $ (2,690,945) Remaining capital cost to finance $ 7,309,055 $ 7,309,055 $ 7,309,055 LTGO bond payment $ 457,688 $ 457,688 $ 457,688 - 30-year bond @ 4.5%, issue costs @ 2% - 1.3%lodging tax may provide up to $213,000 annually for the payment Analysis of Annual Activity Annual cash inflows - Operating revenues (1) $ 230,400 $ 460,800 $ 691,200 - 1.3% COSV lodging tax $ 213,000 $ 213,000 $ 213,000 - Estimated increase in sales tax collections $ 16,779 $ 33,558 $ 50,320 $ 460,179 $ 707,358 $ 954,520 Annual cash outflows - Operating expenses (1) $ 445,000 $ 445,000 $ 445,000 - Bond payment $ 457,688 $ 457,688 $ 457,688 $ 902,688 $ 902,688 $ 902,688 Annual net cash inflow(outflow) $ (442,509) $ (195,330) $ 51,832 Analysis of Other Economic Impacts Estimated visitor spending in the City(1) $ 1,974,000 $ 3,948,000 $ 5,920,000 - Corresponding increase in sales tax $ 16,779 $ 33,558 $ 50,320 Number of jobs created (1) 22 43 67 - Capital cost per job created $ 454,545 $ 232,558 $ 149,254 - The majority of jobs created are assumed by staff to be part-time, minimum wage jobs (1) Values for number of visitors,capital costs,operating revenues, operating expenses,estimated visitor spending in the City, and number of jobs created was taken directly from the CAI report pg. 61. However, the capital cost has been increased due to estimated inflation. (2) Not calculated. (3) December 31, 2019 fund balance is preliminary and unaudited as of May 26,2020. Fairgrounds H:\Tourism Study Info and Analysis\2020 05 26 Admin Report\Analysis far Fairgrounds RH Sportsplex CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA 3/25/2019 Estimated Annual Bond Payments 5/15/2020 Fairgrounds Redevelopment 5/19/2020 Mid-range capital cost $ 10,000,000 (1) Less Fund#104 Q12/31/20 $ (2,690,945) Remaining cost to finance $ 7,309,055 Net bond proceeds needed $ 3,401,500 Lesser of mid-range capital cost or amt financed by lodging tax Bond issue costs $68,030 Assumed at 2%of bond issue Bond issue amount $ 3,469,530 Interest Repayment periodyrs.) Rate 20 I 25 I 30 Annual Bond Payment 3.00% $ 233,207 $ 199,248 $ 177,013 3.50% $ 244,120 $ 210,510 $ 188,643 4.00% $ 255,294 $ 222,091 $ 200,643 4.50% $ 266,724 $ 233,982 $ 213,000 4.75% $ 272,533 $ 240,040 $ 219,307 5.00% $ 278,404 $ 246,172 $ 225,698 5.25% $ 284,336 $ 252,376 $ 232,170 5.50% $ 290,328 $ 258,651 $ 238,722 Financing on remaining amount: Net bond proceeds needed $ 3,907,555 After amount financed through lodging tax Bond issue costs $78,151 Assumed at 2%of bond issue Bond issue amount $ 3,985,706 Interest Repayment period yrs.) Rate 20 25 I 30 Annual Bond Payment 3.00% $ 267,902 $ 228,891 $ 203,348 3.50% $ 280,439 $ 241,829 $ 216,708 4.00% $ 293,275 $ 255,133 $ 230,494 4.50% $ 306,406 $ 268,792 $ 244,689 4.75% $ 313,079 $ 275,752 $ 251,934 5.00% $ 319,823 $ 282,796 $ 259,276 5.25% $ 326,638 $ 289,923 $ 266,711 5.50% $ 333,521 $ 297,132 $ 274,238 (1) Value for capital costs is escalated for inflation from amounts taken directly from the CA!report pg. 61. Bond pmt-Fairgrounds H:\Tourism Study Info and Analysis\2020 05 26 Admin Report\Analysis for Fairgrounds RH Sportsplex CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA 3/25/2019 Calculation Estimated Increases to Sales Tax Collections - Fairgrounds Redevelopment Total Attendance Days Low Baseline ! High Estimated Visitor Spending (1) $ 1,974,000 $ 3,948,000 $ 5,920,000 COSV Sales Tax Rate 0.85% 0.85% 0.85% Estimated increase in sales tax collections $ 16,779 $ 33,558 $ 50,320 (1) Value for estimated visitor spending was taken directly from the CA1 report pg. 61. Sales Tax Calc-Fairgrounds H:\Tourism Study info and Analysis\2020 05 26 Admin Report\2020 05 26 Plante's Ferry Financial Analysis with CAI yr 2 estimate CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 1121/2020 Analysis of Potential Tourism Enhancements 5/15/2020 Sports Complex-Plante's Ferry Renovation Year 2 Allocation between Spokane Year of Operation-Range of Operation County CoSV Years II Year 2 J Year 4 Visitors Total Visitors(1) 390,750 462,800 583,768 Estimated Hotel Room Nights (1) 7,872 10,712 15,488 Capital Costs Mid-Range Capital Costs(1) $ 31,663,000 $ 31,663,000 $ 31,663,000 $ 15,831,500 $ 15,831,500 Less: Preliminary Fund#104 @. 12/31119 (2) $ (2,690,945) $ (2,690,945) $ (2,690,945) $ - $ (2,690,945) Remaining capital cost to finance $ 28,972,055 $ 28,972,055 $ 28,972,055 $ 15,831,500 $ 13,140,555 LTGO bond payment $ 2,271,805 $ 2,271,805 $ 2,271,805 $ 1,241,406 $ 1,030,399 -20 year bond @ 4.5%,issue costs @ 2% - 1.3%lodging tax may provide up to $213,000 annually for the payment Analysis of Annual Activity Annual cash inflows -Operating revenues (1) $ 1,388,500 $ 1,659,390 3 2,241,735 3 829,695 $ 829,695 - 1.3%COSV lodging tax $ 213,000 $ 213,000 $ 213,000 3 - $ 213,000 -Estimated increase in sales tax collections $ 61,912 $ 83,637 $ 125,484 $ - $ 83,637 $ 1,663,412 $ 1,956,027 $ 2,580,219 $ 829,695 $ 1,126,332 Annual cash outflows -Operating expenses (1) $ 2,375,340 $ 2,510,596 $ 2,955,212 $ 1,255,298 $ 1,255,298 -Bond payment $ 2,271,805 $ 2,271,805 $ 2,271,805 $ 1,241,406 $ 1,030,399 $ 4,647,145 $ 4,782,401 $ 5,227,017 $ 2,496,704 $ 2,285,697 Annual net cash inflow(outflow) $ (2,983,733) $ (2,826,374) $ (2,646,798) $ (1,667,009) $ (1,159,365) Analysis of Other Economic Impacts Estimated visitor spending in the City (1) $ 7,283,779 $ 9,839,674 $ 14,762,870 -Corresponding increase in sales tax $ 61,912 $ 83,637 $ 125,484 Number of jobs created (1) 93 125 187 -Capital cost per job created $ 340,462 $ 253,304 $ 169,321 - The majority of jobs created are assumed by staff to be part-time,minimum wage jobs (1) Values for number of visitors,capital costs,operating revenues,operating expenses,estimated visitor spending in the City,and number of]obs created was taken directly from the CSL report dated 05/15/20 pgs.32,33 and 34. (2) December 31,2019 fund balance is preliminary and unaudited as of May 26,2020. Plante's Ferry H:\Tourism Study Info and Analysis\2020 05 26 Admin Report\2020 05 26 Plante's Ferry Financial Analysis with CAI yr 2 estimate CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 1/21/2020 Estimated Annual Bond Payments 5115/202.0_ Sports Complex-Plante's Ferry Renovation Spokane County CoSV Total Mid-range capital cost $ 31,663,000 (1) $ 15,831,500 $ 15,831,500 $ 31,663,000 Less Fund#104 @12131119 $ (2,690,945) $ - $ (2,690,945) $ (2,690,945) Remaining cost to finance $ 28,972,055 $ 15,831,500 $ 13,140,555 $ 28,972,055 Net bond proceeds needed $ 2,716,400 Lesser of mid-range capital cost or amt financed by lodging lax $ 15,831,500 $ 13,140,555 $ 28,972,055 Bond issue costs $54,328 Assumed at 2%of bond issue $318,630 $262,811 $579,441 Bond issue amount $ 2,770,728 $ 16,148,130 $ 13,403,366 $ 29,551,496 Interest Repayment period(yrs.) Rate 20 [ 25 I 30 L 20 I 20 I 20 Annual Bond Payment 3.00% $ 186,236 $ 159,117 $ 141,360 $ 1,085,408 $ 900,917 $ 1,986,325 3.50% $ 194,951 $ 168,111 $ 150,648 $ 1,136,200 $ 943,075 $ 2,079,275 4.00% _ $ 203,875 $ 177,360 $ 160,231 $ 1,188,208 $ 986,243 $ 2,174,451 4.50% $ 213,003 $ 186,855 $ 170,009 $ 1,241,406 I$ 1,030,399 I$ 2,271,805 4.75% _ $ 217,642 $ 191,693 $ 175,136 $ 1,268,443 $ 1,052,841 $ 2,321,284 5.00% $ 222,330 $ 196,590 $ 180,240 $ 1,295,768 $ 1,075,521 $ 2,371,289 5.25% $ 227,067 $ 201,545 $ 185,409 $ 1,323,376 $ 1,098,436 $ 2,421,813 5.50% $ 231,853 $ 206,556 $ 190,641 $ 1,351,265 $ 1,121,585 $ 2,472,849 Financing on remaining amount: Net bond proceeds needed $ 26,255,655 After amount financed through lodging tax Bond issue costs $525,113 Assumed at 2%of bond issue Bond issue amount $ 26,780,768 Interest Repayment period(yrs.) Rate 20 I 25 I 30 Annual Bond Payment 3.00% $ 1,800,088 $ 1,537,962 $ 1,366,335 3.50% $ 1,884,324 $ 1,624,897 $ 1,456,106 4,00% $ 1,970,576 $ 1,714,290 $ 1,548,734 4.50% $ 2,058,802 $ 1,806,069 $ 1,644,113 4.75% $ 2,103,642 $ 1,852,831 $ 1,692,798 5.00°10 $ 2,148,958 $ 1,900,161 $ 1,742,127 5.25% $ 2,194,745 $ 1,948,051 $ 1,792,087 5,50% $ 2,240,997 $ 1,996,489 $ 1,842,661 (1) Estimated capital costs from the CSL report dated 0511520 pg.33. Bond pmt-Plante's Ferry H:\Tourism Study Info and Analysis\2020 05 26 Admin Report\2020 05 26 Plante's Ferry Financial Analysis with CAI yr 2 estimate CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA 1/21/2020 Calculation Estimated Increases to Sales 5/6/2020 Sports Complex - Plante's Ferry Renovation Year of Operation - Range of Operation Year 1 I Year 2 I Year 4 Total Economic Output (1) $ 7,283,779 $ 9,839,674 $ 14,762,870 COSV Sales Tax Rate 0.85% 0.85% 0.85% Estimated increase in sales tax collections $ 61,912 $ 83,637 $ 125,484 (1) Value for estimated visitor spending was taken directly from the CSL report pg. 34. Sales Tax Calc- Plante's Ferry H:\Tourism Study Info and Analysis\2020 05 26 Admin Report\Analysis for Fairgrounds RH Sportsplex CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 1/21/2020 Analysis of Potential Tourism Enhancements 5/15/2020 Sports Complex-Ridgeline HS Year of Operation-Range of Operation Year 1 I I Year 2 I Year 4 Visitors Total Visitors(1) 152,320 211,410 292,540 Estimated Hotel Room Nights(1) 4,603 7,361 11,097 Capital Costs Mid-Range Capital Costs(1) $ 27,870,000 $ 27,870,000 $ 27,870,000 Less: Preliminary Fund#104 @ 12/31/19(2) $ (2,690,945) $ (2,690,945) $ (2,690,945) Remaining capital cost to finance $ 25,179,055 $ 25,179,055 $ 25,179,055 LTGO bond payment $ 1,974,382 $ 1,974,382 $ 1,974,382 - 20-year bond @ 4.5%, issue costs @ 2% - 1.3% lodging tax may provide up to $213,000 annually for the payment Analysis of Annual Activity Annual cash inflows - Operating revenues (1) $ 676,500 $ 885,490 $ 1,312,425 - 1.3% COSV lodging tax $ 213,000 $ 213,000 $ 213,000 - Estimated increase in sales tax collections $ 33,907 $ 53,911 $ 85,368 $ 923,407 $ 1,152,401 $ 1,610,793 Annual cash outflows - Operating expenses (1) $ 1,448,640 $ 1,543,096 $ 1,807,912 - Bond payment $ 1,974,382 $ 1,974,382 $ 1,974,382 $ 3,423,022 $ 3,517,478 $ 3,782,294 Annual net cash inflow(outflow) $ (2,499,615) $ (2,365,077) $ (2,171,501) Analysis of Other Economic Impacts Estimated visitor spending in the City(1) $ 3,989,062 $ 6,342,456 $ 10,043,256 - Corresponding increase in sales tax $ 33,907 $ 53,911 $ 85,368 Number of jobs created (1) 51 81 127 - Capital cost per job created $ 546,471 $ 344,074 $ 219,449 - The majority of jobs created are assumed by staff to be part-time, minimum wage jobs (1) Values for number of visitors, capital costs,operating revenues, operating expenses, estimated visitor spending in the City, and number of jobs created was taken directly from the CSL report dated 5/15/20 pgs.32,33 and 34. (2) December 31, 2019 fund balance is preliminary and unaudited as of May 26, 2020. Ridgeline HS Sports Complex H:\Tourism Study Info and Analysis\2020 05 26 Admin Report\Analysis for Fairgrounds RH Sportsplex CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA 1/21/2020 Estimated Annual Bond Payments 5/15/2020 Sports Complex-Ridgeline HS Mid-range capital cost $ 27,870,000 (1) Less Fund#104 @12/31/19 $ (2,690,945) Remaining cost to finance $ 25,179,055 Net bond proceeds needed $ 3,401,500 Lesser of mid-range capital cost or amt financed by lodging tax Bond issue costs $68,030 Assumed at 2% of bond issue Bond issue amount $ 3,469,530 Interest Repayment period yrs.) Rate 20 25 [ 30 Annual Bond Payment 3,00% $ 233,207 $ 199,248 $ 177,013 3,50% $ 244,120 $ 210,510 $ 188,643 4.00% $ 255,294 $ 222,091 $ 200,643 4.50% $ 266,724 $ 233,982 $ 213,000 4.75% $ 272,533 $ 240,040 $ 219,307 5.00% $ 278,404 $ 246,172 $ 225,698 5.25% $ 284,336 $ 252,376 $ 232,170 5.50% $ 290,328 $ 258,651 $ 238,722 Financing on remaining amount: Net bond proceeds needed $ 21,777,555 After amount financed through lodging tax Bond issue costs $435,551 Assumed at 2% of bond issue Bond issue amount $ 22,213,106 Interest7 Repayment period (yrs.) Rate 20 25 i 30 Annual Bond Payment 3.00% $ 1,493,070 $ 1,275,651 $ 1,133,296 3.50% $ 1,562,938 $ 1,347,759 $ 1,207,756 4.00% $ 1,634,479 $ 1,421,905 $ 1,284,586 4,50% $ 1,707,658 $ 1,498,030 $ 1,363,697 4.75% $ 1,744,850 $ 1,536,817 $ 1,404,078 5,00% $ 1,782,437 $ 1,576,074 $ 1,444,994 5.25% $ 1,820,415 $ 1,615,796 $ 1,486,433 5.50% $ 1,858,778 $ 1,655,973 $ 1,528,381 (1) Estimated capital costs from the CSL report dated 5/15/20 pg. 33 Bond pmt-RHS Sports Complex H,\Tourism Study Info and Analysis\2020 05 26 Admin Report\Analysis for Fairgrounds RH Sportsplex CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 1/21/2020 Calculation Estimated Increases to Sales 5/15/2020 Tax Collections - Ridgeline HS Sports Complex Year of Operation - Range of Operation Year 1 Year 2 I Year 4 Total Economic Output (1) $ 3,989,062 $ 6,342,456 $ 10,043,256 COSV Sales Tax Rate 0.85% 0.85% 0.85% Estimated increase in sales tax collections $ 33,907 $ 53,911 $ 85,368 (1) Value for estimated visitor spending was taken directly from the CSL report pg. 34. Sales Tax Calc RHSports Complex Questions? ._ . ._. _,,,,,,,., • • , ...,...L.,.... .. . . .. .a.,„.:. . , .4.,.....,•.. _ . , r..„ .. , _ .._ :_ ...., m ,„„,...„ gy . , , .0...,.,z F . .. oim■■fg -ibia. . o4N p- E al' 1 Q CE N .. ! i _,,, - mi. &ilk T j -----";-141.- -H131 ' , G f INIF si._ 1 1 ti rf- _a :rwl"-. rlri -- ' \\II. - ' iik. EMI ._ - 101 RI AL.. Irill IME riiimil w■ 41.P. Illy r! 9 ` — . N(.‘,.*'''' +, , 1 1 ''I:: �`. I. ' /* rOise:usslun PorPo,i s Only likO? ' f„......,— ----=--.....,\ ... }t 1 �,, ...<�f/j L'::: if I L, . I* . Jo . 1\ -, ___ \ ' .01 \.,___ 4*._:0-..— 4 'i 'K. 1 -- .11 i —} 4•_ . 1 t / {LLQ L Fl i, Cl i ff----1,, -2 . . 1 ,. , ,,,, ----- . \ _..... ._ . _ ..\.:, ,, , ,\,,,,. . 4w... I , -'U'l 11 1 7 111 } p�'�yl r� 1 '�r} rAn ''N'S q ,._..` 4~ _� a d� r 1-'410 -di tiM,' ""--,:- \ . 46: . ; P'..:-.):-• lilt le I' 1 II N ~'JS, y� r41� of r I1 .k a�� 1, !i . ,_, _ r j .-� rr, r., a P f 1 r� �_ s ia i k. I f 13 rA. y..-rtir , .Y'•I� 1 I' 1 c l \IIiiit, )II, , i li 01-7 ii 2, 4\\ I r `• J", fir..--'� `a '4. /l. { 1 1 ° 1 r - r. f, FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS FOR POTENTIAL 11,7 NEW OUTDOOR SPORTS FACILITIES IN SPOKANE VALLEY, WASHINGTON = ,,, May 15, 2020 � _ • t Spoan �' = ,Walley.: • t•_.....,,, , SL Far Discussion Purposes Only May 15, 2020 Mr. John Hohman Deputy City Manager City of Spokane Valley 10210 E. Sprague Avenue Spokane Valley, Washington 99206 Dear Mr. Hohman: Conventions, Sports & Leisure International (CSL) has completed an update to our comparative analysis for new outdoor sports facilities in Spokane Valley, Washington. The analysis presented in this report is based on estimates, assumptions and other information developed from industry research, data provided by study stakeholders, surveys of potential facility users, discussions with industry participants and analysis of competitive/comparable facilities and communities. The sources of information, the methods employed, and the basis of significant estimates and assumptions are stated in this report. Some assumptions inevitably will not materialize and unanticipated events and circumstances may occur, Therefore, actual results achieved will vary from those described and the variations may be material. The findings presented herein are based on analyses of present and near-term conditions in the Spokane Valley area. As in all studies of this type, the recommendations and estimated results are based on competent and efficient management of the subject facility and assume that no significant changes in the event markets or assumed immediate and local area market conditions will occur beyond those set forth in this report. Furthermore, all information provided to us by others was not audited or verified and was assumed to be correct. The report has been structured to provide study stakeholders with a foundation of research to provide decision makers with the information necessary to evaluate issues related to potential future decisions concerning the potential for new outdoor sports facilities in Spokane Valley and should not be used for any other purpose. This report, its findings or references to CSL may not be included or reproduced in any public offering statement or other financing document. We sincerely appreciate the assistance and cooperation we have been provided in the compilation of this report and would be pleased to be of further assistance in the interpretation and application of our findings. Very truly yours, CSL International Conventions, Spoils&Leisure International r 520 Nicollet Mail•Suite 520•Minneapolis, MN 55402• Telephone 612.294.2000•www,cslinti.com ♦.rte i..r D UsSicn a,urpones Cniy TABLE OF CONTENTS ,,, • s),.„..._ . . -,-,‘ .. _ _-, ., 1 . Introduction 4 .- Lid -- 2. Situation Analysis 6 :rr` ` .•" 3. Opportunity Analysis 18 , a.° 4. Cost/Benefit Analysis 29 41 - ' 0. , -II._ w 44, _-.. „1::;.:-..,..i...: I fk i + s . 1 .. FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS FOR POTENTIAL NEW OUTDOOR SPORTS FACILITIES IN SPOKANE VALLEY, WASHINGTON ��1 Page 3 .7L ror Discussion Purposes Only ,--, ri L _ • _ _ • .-\\-‘ N i ilk- '4010P "....N , . ;- 1 - - 1 1 ..) .• r. .. N il li .- (0) D LLJ ( ,, Jr (,..__..1) . • ,- ''- • ‘ . • • •..., ,‘ 1 , . , ,, ,, . i .• 1 i .• it . . t • 4 1, la 0 .1-1• 1' ' -‹ in lit - I.'41 INN k4 sir!'" - r. . . .. .4.,.,... ---.._ FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS FOR POTENTIAL NEW OUTDOOR SPORTS FACILITIES IN SPOKANE VALLEY, WASHINGTON 1. .SI Page 4 'I . INTRODUCTION : Project Background & Approach For[11soussron Purposes Only Conventions, Sports & Leisure International (CSL) was retained by the City of Spokane Valley to update a feasibility and East Valley HS Site economic impact analysis for the potential development of outdoor triangle (baseball/softball) fields, which builds upon work and findings related to CSL's Feasibility Study for Potential New Outdoor Multi-Use Sports Facilities in Spokane County completed in x,� yi, November 2016. ` N. 5 CSL was originally engaged in 2016 by Spokane County, with funding participation and collaboration by the cities of Spokane \ ' s q� si*, 4.1 Valley and Liberty Lake, the Central Valley School District and the Regional Sports Commission to analyze the market, Es,�.„,,r,,rt , , r;i programmatic, financial and economic feasibility of potential new/improved outdoor multi-use sports facilities in Spokane County1,;!,,,.4.,,.., ,.} +'t�'f ,.*;,-1:, 1.,41:: : for the purpose of driving new revenue and economic impact to Spokane County, as well as enhancing rental, practice and other i ,Y * A. ' Y clit special event facility alternatives available for County residents. l'•' r 1 ,`,.„ l,'. `� r(r In late 2019, City of Spokane Valley representatives approached CSL to discuss two new potential site opportunities for outdoor 14. ,;r t: 1 °�•r "° �1.' {4i sports facilities, with a specific focus on triangle field complexes. The intent of this update to our original study is to specifically id" % ,;`' ..at . S r.k C il'' �l ,,rt assist the City of Spokane Valley and other stakeholders to comparatively evaluate the market opportunities and viability of facility investment under the two following potential development options: Ridgeline HS Site r - • Seven (7) new triangle fields to be developed near East Valley High School and East Valley Middle School in conjunction v with a redevelopment of five (5) existing triangle fields at Plante's Ferry. i ® �i �i _. . ;. ,I . �- • Ten (10) new triangle fields at the former site of the Spokane Gun Club to be developed in conjunction with Central Valley i1 �il 1 ;;slr'_ , 1- School District's new Ridgeline High School. 1110 ., € ! " f The research, analysis and conclusions associated with the previous Feasibility Study provides a foundation for our assessment I 4114H 1111 \ 11111 andprogrammatic assumptions for projecting the utilization and cost/benefit implications for each of the two potential ; .1 �� development scenarios. Additionally, we conducted telephone interviews with community stakeholders and potential user groupsMA ` lo. i, • to update our market assessment. We then conducted an evaluation of each of the proposed sites, conducting a high-levelf , SWOC analysis before updating our comparative cost/benefit projections for each. ;' FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS FOR POTENTIAL NEW OUTDOOR SPORTS FACILITIES IN SPOKANE VALLEY, WASHINGTON it 7i Page 5 7 Far Discussion Purposes Only ,f ' i f7 6c.ii--::::,, 1- , 1 u A 1.., i/ (0 I NI '' 1 ,.,,, ) . - . . , ,. ,, , ,..,. .. ....._ , .,.,f N. . .11 !,V1,1.' ;, : ' ',, " :. I , . h- \, .1 r\11 ll \ F-1 11 K--> \ ii a 4..t II -,� `�ti ". ,''t kVri V \ • „..r„, ,, , _,.. t is p'We_ . il -12„. ,...j,,,,.."\ ----z,..7----_ _. ._ _ • FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS FOR POTENTIAL NEW OUTDOOR SPORTS FACILITIES IN SPOKANE VALLEY, WASHINGTON r •✓� Page 6 0 2 . SITUATION ANALYSIS : Plante's Ferry & East Valley HS Site For urscusslon Purposes only Concept #1 • "—``�_____ .,,,�• ,-•• '` ."0,44;e L ` Plante's Ferry Renovation & ;; ., 1 - ' '" +� -, 1-11-1.,—.. I ` , East Valley High School Development ' ` \ k ti' ; k` pe.f. s • Renovate five (5) existing triangle fields at Plante's Ferry • /r\ � , `["' r.s z. `, ‘s , �r . til I • Develop seven (7) new triangle fields at or near East Valley High ,,�,• 1L� r a I 1 \ ., ;g t School t t., ' `, ti• ` , 'i I - • A partnership between S Spokane Valleyand Spokane Countywould `', - * ' - Ap p .. r '' , be responsible for the development of four (4) total fields. k, , , .., <<�,,,•ti , . . " T 1 • Sites separated bytwo miles and connected byWellesleyAvenue { ,, r \4....4..... ,i I • Spokane Valley/Spokane County is continuing work on renovating ! tri` rrt1,4,}11,+li ;i�:+,,,( �;} .\ , �,, (-_= multipurpose rectangle fields at Plante's Ferry "` _;; � ,�11:..r.:., 111;-r.� 3_,• . rk'"°� `" 'ill,,-.W7'° - ' "�;w ' • Facility operating model is to-be-determined. Facility operator + ',;i j `'. 1 ,i'' ;,i, ' :i ;f ° ° ''-\1 `� would need to work with East Valley School District for access and , ,. , r,•,*' • t •,�, ' , ',��, ;`r-•,� :r ; /! (.. I_ \ r .. k rights to their fields 1 �,,;=r ,� !a r ; ; .01:*,,.-, '' 4, .'• L-' \, I 1 ) booking !g pi$ ,r - to- � Tr �' �; 1! \ , S, .1 ! ( r 414:iff rL� . '�¢ -11 4 5 I ! rr. J! '1 1 t4 !, .I 4 a. (4' � .k`��f3.k�R(-• 5,iq tF,,r', ,r *1'4, 1"c 1, • }, z , •-1 •� ....�, r � x�,*�Y1' /y', �;.5 1 �r, S� - Lao. •i 5 ` . ... I { 111.x. _. i1F+,, di gil`r'4 '1 , Y.,-, , if/ 4.-a*w • .. FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS FOR POTENTIAL NEW OUTDOOR SPORTS FACILITIES IN SPOKANE VALLEY, WASHINGTON CSL Page 7 2 . SITUATION ANALYSIS : Ridgeline High School i to For Discussion Purposes Only 1 Concept #2. � 44,---- '� �� --„rt.,-.. _,,,,_..-__---,„:„.- 1 Central Valley School District! --- i' -T -- r� Ridgeline High School Development `f ` ` ` "`� r' d,° I - iii. ...,---• �- il..... y'-.-�'r� r: E :i _ S r _.112_ p - - • Develop ten (10) new fields at former site of Spokane Gun Club r ' s• " - - --' ` -- J • The City would be responsible for developing all ten fields t-- r✓ „--�� )) f � • Central Valley School District is currently constructing Ridgeline q1 •P '` Il';. 1f`''j "� 01----- ll oi, r n -o--o 1--o-�t n 1 . High School at the former site of the Spokane Gun Club 1 i,.., . \ �`, '• \ r,^=f- � fin t -` ,1 I - 1 IF-D-4 } • RHS will offer four (4) triangle fields and four (4) rectangle fields f ►' F f4 \-)--4.1111.' -• CVSD will make two (2) of the four triangle fields available upon ,� t"4,1111 r 4 , lb( ;r � � �, ,a / request. 4 , * �`' r t `!' ' ! ` - ---- • Less than a mile and a half from access to Interstate 90 -1-tit . 1•:` `": _.'i ' .o\ ,�- • Approximately two miles from the HUB Sports Complex; potential ' �4 V `-c1( \ ;1# pp Y p p 11t= 1 partnership for operations of both complexes. .1�; `, `4- "e - j ` ' qiii: L . .,,-' ,-.„ ii fr , ' t0 - _A, „sv,F tl \ -r ! 1. i ,Ili F l. .,5_.. — .` r``Qi``' -\ kUrr r I . .71, - .\ . % . , ' it ,, , ' .,„,- ..ski., I . !:.t':? IL - 1' e 1 ,1,, i FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS FOR POTENTIAL NEW OUTDOOR SPORTS FACILITIES IN SPOKANE VALLEY, WASHINGTON4 rci Page 8 2 . SITUATION ANALYSIS : Key Market Demographics For Oiscv55100Purposes Only The exhibit below illustrates the location of Spokane Valley its proximity to nearby markets and the markets/land area captured within 30-minute, 90-minute and 180-minute estimated driving distances from Spokane Valley. It is reasonable to expect that most residents within 30-minutes would be willing to participate in league games, practices and other such activities on a regular basis. Those within 90-minutes could be expected to participate in somewhat regular games and tournament activity, while those further away would be more likely to travel only for larger events. Spokane Valley's population of more than 543,500 within 30 minutes and nearly 819,000 within 90 minutes suggest a strong base of individuals that have a potential need for amateur sports facilities. The nearly 1.6 million within three hours suggests a potential opportunity to host non-local tournament activity. Spokane State of Tr Gran.'r•on 5 0 Demographic Variable Valle 30-minute 90-minute 180-minute Washin.ton U.S. _. _ _ _ _ ,_ _ Y 01;ll4'].kn 'W1 r Population(2000) 79,654 414,527 630,395 1,221,435 5,894,121 281,421,906 `i '.',l 3 1 Population(2010) 89,657 476,035 720,368 1,418,456 6,724,540 308,745,538 t'.s cNe te'r • . ' ,,lr,irtr-,Pr,��=: Population(2019 est.) 102,009 543,517 818;948 1,596,977 7,608,571 332,417,793 1 _y %change(2000-2019) 28.1% 31.1% 29.9% 30.7% 29.1% 18.1% ' PR.a 1" If I I%alif, ell:, 1 iii .1!ni,ora lcrr Population(2024 est) 109,140 581,903 876,180 1,701,677 8,120,093 345,487,602 l;.,, ' I - ' % 0 o tr o 0 0 i' - '1. :i0,r,ir,urec Change(2019-2024) 7.0% 7.9/ 70/ 6.6/n 6.7/0 3.9/0 � inn,1 x11111 vmtrt mac', rl,nl..r 1 Pue • Avg. Household Inc. (2019 est.) $69,528 $76,607 $75,409 $74,415 $99,689 $87,398 :11m.. ,'as Avg. Household Inc. (2024 est.) $81,616 $89,611 $87,825 $86,376 $115,574 $99,638 '* I,u,.I�n: f_ otio',',. I % Change(2019-2024) 17.4% 17.0% 16.5% 16.1% 15.9% 14.0% 1757r:r ;Ai;-1' ` '., - -� -71 ! - aralf.n<I rcrr•l Median Age(2019, in years) 38.2 38.1 39.9 37.5 38.6 38.5 Gr.kH 1,,0 ,,.1t Leaiel'ofiti, liv,_$ rto t:1 i11J Hr-41<•_ ;;rvn ran 'F , », , .� y�„ ✓3rtrtrr{alclr rtal�tLL Businesses(2019 est) 4,354 19,746 29,336 53,881 254,548 12,112,147 1.n.ea Employees(2019 est.) 50,138 250,776 335,784 642,119 3,093,584 150,271,675 r,iP^,,.,;d Employee/Residential Population Ratio 0.49:1 _ 0.46:1 _ 0.41:1 0:40:1 0.41:1 0.45:1 1!,,,..11.4 j Source:Google Maps,ESRI,2019. FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS FOR POTENTIAL NEW OUTDOOR SPORTS FACILITIES IN SPOKANE VALLEY, WASHINGTON Page 9 cSL 2r 1FL.J /\1I IBJ /\I\J/\L....'y'S I ■ Estimated �, n�A P 4 r il,p - p 't i n ror Discussion PUlposes on4Y The following exhibit summarizes the estimated population base participating in outdoor sports based on participation rates applied to the overall market population. The rate of participation includes only frequent users and does not account for occasional and infrequent users. The city of Spokane Valley would have an estimated 880 to 1,280 total participants in baseball and another 540 to 550 in softball based on national and regional participation rates. Frequent participants within a 30-minute drive would range between 4,700 and 6,800 for baseball and 2,860 to 2,900 for softball, while a 180-minute drive radius would yield between an estimated 13,800 to 20,000 for baseball and 8,400 to 8,600 for softball This base of frequent participants presents a significant opportunity to host non-local tournament, event and other activity in Spokane Valley. Estimated Frequent Participants City of - - 30-minute 90-minute -- .180-minute State of Spokane Vale Drive Time • Drive Time Drive Time 6, Washington Market Population:ulation: 102�009 543,517 818,948 1,596,977 7,608,571 p National Regional ;National egiona� National Region ational Regional National Regional Rate Rate Rate Rate Rate Rat Rate Rate Rate Rate Baseball 882 1,280 4,702 6,817 • 7,084 10,27 13,815 20,031 65,818 95,436 Softball , 548 537 2,919 2,860 4,398 4,310 8,576 8,404 40,857 40,040 Flag Football ; 114 129 607 686 915 1,03' 1,784 2,016 8,499 9,603 Tackle Football 713 528 3,798 2,8111 ' 5,723 4,23 '11,160 8,25. 53,171 39,346 Touch Football . 190 179 1,015 9544 1,529 1,43 • 2,981 2,80• ' 14,205 13,352 Lacrosse 128 178 684 950 1,030 1,432 2,009 2,79 9,569 13,302 Soccer , 1,361 1,701' 7,252 9,066 10,927 13,659 21,308 26,63,, Pr101,520 126,901 AVERAGE 562 647 2,997 3,449 4,515 5,197 8,805 10,134 41,948 48,283 Source: NSGA, ESRI,2019. FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS FOR POTENTIAL NEW OUTDOOR SPORTS FACILITIES IN SPOKANE VALLEY, WASHINGTON � L Page 10 7 2 . SITUATION ANALYSIS ■ Hotel In !I en ory rot Discussion Purposes Only A central driving factor in the determination to develop and operate new outdoor sports facilities in Spokane Valley is the opportunity to generate economic impact through non-local spending. To evaluate the opportunity to retain this impact it is important to analyze the inventory and location of hotel rooms relative to the potential sites for facility development. Currently, there are 11 hotel properties throughout Spokane Valley and two in nearby Liberty Lake. The Blue and Green dots represent the location of the Plante's Ferry/East Valley High School sites and the Ridgeline High School site, respectively. All recent new hotel development has occurred within Spokane Valley, including nearly 400 new rooms between the Fairfield, Holiday Inn Express, Residence Inn and Ramada hotel properties. _. . 1 '410Map # of PF .�oi.l , Ke Hotel Rooms I Mirabeau Park Hotel & CC 235 IV ii,,-,r 'Illiiiiiinrrrli 2 Super 8 180 3 Fairfield by Marriott Spokane Valley 128 Park " 'ti 4 Oxford Suites Spokane Valley 128 2 14 (ill!) 0,IyL) 5 Hampton Inn & Suites Spokane Valley 106 - l 6 Comfort Inn & Suites Spokane Valley 103 0g 1 , 00 13 5 Lll� rty L7 Holiday Inn Express Spokane Valley 103 1 - yam,,... i_7, - Tru by Hilton Spokane Valley (1) 92 hpolc:an i,�i,,i 9 Residence Inn by Marriott Spokane Valley 84 DIshtn+v Valley y ert�rlt�l�_� Greem ri+.s RHS CU III 10 Ramada Spokane Valley 76 1__ . . Irl l�nr so ; `iI`rI Best Western Plus Liberty Lake Inn 76 I lril . i.lc . Quality Inn & Suites at Liberty Lake 69 ' 13 My Place Hotel Spokane Valley 64 • ,' 14 Baymont Inn & Suites Spokane Valley 61 0 Potential Complex Sites (1)Tru by Hilton Spokane Valley expected to open fall 2020. Source; Spokane Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau, 2019 FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS FOR POTENTIAL NEW OUTDOOR SPORTS FACILITIES IN SPOKANE VALLEY, WASHINGTON Page 11 c; SL 2 . SITUATION ANALYSIS : Competitive Regional Complexes I-oruiaaussionpuiposesOnly Based on conversations with stakeholders, tournament organizers, sanctioning bodies and other market research, we identified 13 competitive triangle facilities throughout Washington, Oregon, Idaho, and Western Montana. While the total number of fields at identified competitive regional complexes range from four to ten fields, no complex has more than six fields of any one specific dedicated type (e.g., youth baseball, adult softball, etc.). Additional detail on specific facilities is provided on the following page. Baseball Softball Total ?r. "' }' l Key Facilit Location Adult Youth Adult Youth Other Fields '''' ' • ntla4:r;t c.nt�r.rr r.'. 1 I,1:rrr pi,,rs 1 U.S. Cellular Community Park Medford, OR 3 0 5 2 0 10 .: L/ I9;r; 2 Simplot Sports Complex Boise, ID 0 6 0 2 1 9 S�3III? s NANO :.a•-IUIJ :T"I ,l. 3 Settlers Park Meridian, ID 0 5 0 3 0 8 ' 4 g :� 1.1011 &U .._, 11-:k iaa 4 Sprinkler Rec Center Tacoma, WA .0 0 4 4 0 8 6 10 -I. • 8 13 .`.' 5 Spurgin Park Missoula, MT 0 6 0 2 0 a1.4.,, ‘K. . . ?• t,. 6 Gordon Faber Rec. Complex Hillsboro OR 2 0 5 0 0 7 .. °f'17n'' r, 0 :111) 14 lu ti Er " "i111a-q&Litt. {j 1• 11,&tnal • 7 Dwight Merkel Sports Complex Spokane, WA 0 0 6 0 0 6 „ 1 ►I I (+ r,wl.n B. 8 Pasco Sporting Complex Pasco, WA 0 0 5 1 0 6p7 " E;r,:=,11 ';„ ;'. 9 Boise Creek Park Enumclaw, WA 0 0 4 2 0 6 -' • 'C1 i 10 Pasco Youth Baseball Complex Pasco, WA 0 5 0 1 0 6 1, or 1 „ ?' A,, ;,{ .5' 11 Paul Lauzier Memorial Athletic Park Moses Lake, WA 2 0 3 0 0 6 12 Wallace Marine Park Softball Complex Salem, OR 0 0 5 0 0 5 13 Southridge Sports Complex Kennewick, WA 0 0 4 0 0 4 Source: Facility Management,2019, FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS FOR POTENTIAL NEW OUTDOOR SPORTS FACILITIES IN SPOKANE VALLEY, WASHINGTON Page 12 CL 2 . SITUATION ANALYSIS : Competitive Re ianaI Complexes rur Discussion purposes Only We have identified four complexes that provide a representative sense of the competition for attracting and hosting larger tournaments that draw from a state, regional and national base. When hosting the largest state, regional and national tournaments, communities like the Tri-Cities will leverage access to multiple locations (e.g., Pasco Sporting Complex, Southridge Sports Complex and/or Pasco Youth Baseball Complex) to accommodate all teams. Others, such as U.S. Cellular Community Park accommodate large tournaments by offering high quality synthetic turf fields with lights and portable mounds, fences and bases provide guaranteed games for a wide array of types of teams and age levels. ,,o, �' 1'';,Sts, Uy _�y4 * Dwight Merkel Sports Complex U.S. Cellular Community Park `► ► . Dwight Merkel Sports Complex is a $11 million multi- U.S. Cellular Community Park is a $32.5 million ,-t, . _:• ,; . sport complex in Spokane, Washington that opened in t multi-sport complex in Medford, Oregon most i,"" 2010. This facility offers eight rectangle fields, six '+r•: recently renovated in 2015. The facility offers nine s ,, _� ' `� A triangle fields, a skate park, a playground and a splash ,--,•;,., I '• ,, synthetic turf triangle fields, a 1,300 seat stadium ,� ► pad. The complex hosts a variety of tournaments i_. with a natural grass field and six turf rectangle fields. o =• T including the SIYB Best in the Northwest Tournament. \ The Park hosts approximately 44 tournaments per 41 i i ti r '' This particular tournament is also hosted at multiple 'I i ',,i �Il i"."ow year, with an estimated 194,000 visitors. Funding for ',,.', ` , ' other locations because no single facility offers enough the facility came from a combination of bonds, •. fields to host the entire tournament. lodging tax, car rental tax, park utility fees and U.S. Cellular naming rights. '--.4 Pasco Sporting Complex , ` .: Southridge Sports Complex I,, r4 Pasco Sporting Complex is a multi-sport complex South Ridge Sports Complex is a multi-sport complex located in Pasco, Washington. It offers six triangle i/. l` located in Kennewick, Washington. It offers a .E °. + 5 fields, a 3,700 seat stadium, eleven rectangle fields, '\ community play area, four triangle fields, two `+,,+q ,. o e al courts and a water play area. The ` / Er ". "` rectan le fields a 30000 s uare foot indoor s orts tis,1,8 �, 1.,.,, { two sandy II yb 1 rt t p y ` g q p 1a. ,i.--,`".+"(. - }• ' Tri-City Dust Devils NWL minor league baseball team .� \-' and events pavilion, a 9/11 World Trade Center 1 •� "• { ' `:, calls the complex home. Memorial and a carousel. The facility attracts local, Y r regional and national softball tournaments. FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS FOR POTENTIAL NEW OUTDOOR SPORTS FACILITIES IN SPOKANE VALLEY, WASHINGTON Page 13 �:: L 2 r SITUATION ANALYSIS ■ Competitive Regio1 1aICorn p l exa For Discussion Purposos Oniy Based on conversations with stakeholders, tournament organizers, sanctioning bodies and other market research, we identified 19 competitive rectangle facilities throughout Washington, Oregon, Idaho, and Western Montana. The total number of fields at identified competitive regional complexes range from eight to nineteen fields. Additional detail on specific facilities is provided on the following page. Total r:.. ,. '7 9 + II.,.n., KeyFacilit Location Adult Youth Other Fields +nr,nria' ! INt 4,,l`"'""'j" A EI:;'E to 1 Pasco Sporting Complex Pasco, WA 8 17 12 37 13 ` .A.:<,urt,arr, 1r' 11 ci' LLQ/t.. 2 Simplot Sports Complex Boise, ID 10 25 0 35 3 r:nrruc 3 Sixty Acres Park Redmond, WA 16 9 0 25 5 ,,,•- 11,-41' ,. 1- 4 SOZO Sports Complex Yakima, WA 13 4 0 17 Ort 8 " . 9 Y' 1.1011.,U-• 4 .s - .,,, I',Jana 5 Starfire Sports Tukwila, WA 7 5 1 1311 6 Harmony Sports Complex Vancouver, WA 4 6 3 13 41 s , u,zyr�i: _r 1, (` rJ'r, 7 Northwest Soccer Park Bellingham, WA 10 2 0 12 �, 6 . 8 Washington Premier Football Club Complex Puyallup, WA 7 3 2 12 1215ran+r ` f l`, 9 Rotary Park Ellensburg, WA 0 7 5 12 ,{ r} ,'cti rl'.;"`, '_ .�, 5a]cru 9 " ti:i1,,,t,d4 10 Kalispell Youth Athletic Complex Kalispell, MT 6 6 0 12 `� ' �3 `I { c 'coca.' f t r�r nor r,• 1• 11 Spokane Polo Club Spokane, WA 7 3 0 10 • ci „`ti;,',`,;,, 12 Capital FC Soccer Complex Salem, OR 9 1 0 10 Falls ,:Idaho : I 13 Stocker Fields Snohomish,WA 9 1 0 10 .r 14 Crystal Lake Sports Fields Corvallis, OR 5 4 0 9 " . l / ' • ,..,. 15 Owens Sports Complex Portland, OR 4 5 0 9 1.1�trx•trJ n n A r:n'F v F n s r .i '37 16 Dwight Merkel Sports Complex Spokane. WA 7 1 0 8 17 Bombing Range Sports Complex West Richland, WA 0 8 0 8 18 Smith Athletic Fields Whitefish, MT 8 0 0 8 19 Bender Fields- Lynden Parks Lynden, WA 6 0 2 8 Source: Facility Management,2020. FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS FOR POTENTIAL NEW OUTDOOR SPORTS FACILITIES IN SPOKANE VALLEY, WASHINGTON Page 14 c SL 2 . SITUATION ANALYSIS : Competitive Regional Complexes For Discussion Purposes Only p � We have identified four complexes that provide a representative sense of the competition for attracting and hosting larger tournaments that draw from a state, regional and national base. When hosting the largest state, regional and national tournaments, communities like the Tri-Cities, Seattle, and Boise will leverage access to multiple locations (e.g., Pasco Sporting Complex, Simplot Sports Complex and Sixty Acres Park) to accommodate all teams. Others, such as Harmony Sports Park and SOZO Sports Complex accommodate large tournaments by offering high quality synthetic turf fields with lights and portable mounds, fences and bases provide guaranteed games for a wide array of types of teams and age levels. Spokane Polo Club ,., ,�` ,- Harmony Sports Complex Ii'l` The SpokanepPolo Club offers 10 fields (seven full-size 1tin'i 1,"a'° Harmony Sports Park of Vancouver, WA is a major l4 \ S! r-r•,. 41,,�i 1,, a i{ t ,' adult fields and three youth fields) and is located just c IN , athletics venue of southern Washington and northern 4! 1, 1`* .jam;sIA044.4174; '711!.. f' f .. , . lb ti° , north of Spokane International Airport. It is currently Oregon.The complex features 13 rectangle fields, 8 1 -II.,' „, -•' I , home to the Spokane Shadow Youth Soccer Club, a • - ,. , _'y: triangle fields, as well as on-site parking and L-1,4''';_ , '{y`. 14 ''t ' artner of the Seattle Sounders, and hosts the 200- .1",..1,,, t t.,„?..„„ � restrooms. The complex(ex iso en year-round for �' ' F �'�'' team Northwest Cu Soccer tournament everyAugust. 1' .4 �° p p Cup g • , , ., t ; , tournaments, regular league play, and practices. ,- % 1 '~, , } ,, r• _.�° : _ 'y N,. Additionally, the fields are equipped with li lighting, I yg gr ' 'D. , allowing for more flexible game times. rt. 1, Simplot Sports Complex ," -,t;,„ SOZO Sports Complex � - Simplot Sports Complex is a 161-acre athletics facility ';., 1 f - 1 .\\ Situated in Yakima, Washington, SOZO Sports e located in Boise, Idaho. The complex features 35 r r, u\ Complex is a major sports hub of Central Washington. ,I °„` • rectangle fields, 14 triangle fields, a playground, and 'r• W ,1i The complex currently features 17 grass rectangle / on-site restrooms.The facility's large size makes it the iret `' fields. Construction is currently underway for an premier destination for large tournaments, regular I ° 1 attached indoor complex featuring basketball/volleyball �° league play, and practices in the region. However, the "�',`° courts and indoor turf as well as a future ice arena. , tournaments are limited to the daytime as the facility l 1 Since its completion, the facility attracts over 100 event _,� does not have lighting on its fields. i AA r' days annually, a majority of which involve overnight visits that benefit the central Washington economy. FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS FOR POTENTIAL NEW OUTDOOR SPORTS FACILITIES IN SPOKANE VALLEY, WASHINGTON rr Page 15 CSL 2 . SITUATION ANALYSIS : Important Emerging Trends ror DlscusslOO Purposes°ON' 1. Covered Areas/Hospitality Space: Participants and attendees are increasingly looking for -- covered/shaded areas for time in between games and during inclement weather, These spaces should a be strategically located in high-traffic areas with good access to/from fields throughout the complex. J f��\fie �, Additionally, these facilities present an opportunity to offer hardscaped bathrooms, concession space, �~~� '. _ .. official/umpire rooms, team/meeting rooms and other such space. ,f ,,.W 2, Sibling Play Areas: Access to well designed play space (including playground space, dedicated playiririinl; $ " d L P, `k space, splashpads and other water features, etc.) provides alternative activities for siblings and helps to ...,--1 r , '', . 'I-', a' . keep non-participants in a more controlled space. Further, offering these types of amenities can ' '-. . 411111 increase the length of stay for participant families, increase the likelihood of return visits and increase - F per capita concession revenue as a result of increased average attendance levels. 1 i 3. Sufficient Warm-up Space: As much a safety concern as it is a convenience, providing adequate t r . L i \' space between fields and other infrastructure to allow teams to warm-up prior to the start of their ...•.„• `' , .,._ ,,, i_ i tournament game helps to ensure good flow for larger events. T �'',;` g 4. Flexible Vendor/Sponsor Space: Providing space in high-traffic areas for vendors and sponsors ,,,, j` 'l ft, 11 , 4 Ar..�aQ 9 to set-up booths, tents, tables or food trucks offers an opportunity for enhanced revenue generation. ', ,, ,•° 4 f ' ' ,, importantly, different tournaments, sports and other events have different needs for their sponsors ; .� t �" ' and/or potential vendors, so flexibility within the space is key. Access to power supply is sometimes "6- f' required, but investment in this infrastructure without proof of market is not required. , 141 11 f ii. 5. Enhanced Technological Offerings: ProvidingWi-Fi access throughout anypublic assemblyI! !11,7 ':';':k g� g g k 1 I �.. � �, venue or complex is becoming increasingly expected by event attendees. Opportunities to partner with , �; ti-, L .:, -_ �:7 local service providers should be pursued to help defray the cost of development and/or ongoing -" ; � I 'LT i e' = s: operations. Further, as technology needs continue to change at a rapid pace, it is important to consider ( r. scalable investments. �` j FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS FOR POTENTIAL NEW OUTDOOR SPORTS FACILITIES IN SPOKANE VALLEY, WASHINGTON dr , Page 16 •.. 2 . SITUATION ANALYSIS : Synthetic Turf Advantages iurUlsrusslonPurposesOnly '1. Upfront vs. Ongoing Costs: Although synthetic turf fields can cost $800,000 to $900,000 per field `.. r.,�`^ _,k.:+;. n}} ,r,� (under a multi-field competitive bid) to purchase and install (versus $350,000-$450,000 for tournament- 71171 y ,. quality natural grass), annual maintenance for a synthetic turf field typically costs between $7,000•- , h I $12,000, while maintenance for natural grass fields costs between $35,000 and $45,000 per year on .. _ average. ,. 2. Enhanced Usage & Marketability: Fast moisture draining, recovery and durability of synthetic fields result in a significant reduction in cancelled tournaments and games due to inclement weather relative to natural grass/dirt fields. This leads to enhanced marketability for tournaments and higher, more consistent, use/attendance levels. Synthetic fields are estimated to increase the number of playable hours by approximately 50 percent due to the ability to withstand weather conditions. 3. Lifespan & Replacement: Turf fields have a useful life of between 10 and 15 years. At time of replacement, costs are approximately 60 to 80 percent of the initial purchase and installation cost, as the t � ` � �• �-` - = �, foundation, base, and drainage system can be re-used, - ,, .t - ,, ; .,. ,$ :. , ' ' , wet wow [41—-;111U-- 4 110010 0010 %wimp Tirri ,.. . i, , .4 s "ffOr' ?, - i ,,,! p,; iii , i t; ,. ii.,; - ,, , it ' i '1,( /1 ;Iil ' i :4'. /A) ,. „Ai ,, , „4,Ift i'• Al- -f It Iv {1e s. ' !_ •s V.,.;l.. _ '4k.,' FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS FOR POTENTIAL NEW OUTDOOR SPORTS FACILITIES IN SPOKANE VALLEY, WASHINGTON `' Page 17 t.� L For Dlsaussion Purposes Only ------- . . .. Ili\VI,• . ..„ "'.. .':i1 IIIIIIIhgllIllill""liillIlliIlldIIIPIIIIII lkil; \/ NI I .1( \ r.. . J ...t' ' 'L., ,,1 111' , . . ems. -a, 10- i 04 .,,,, 4. :_. 7 i- \ - „ ....., f• '• I *PI , ; qc V 'ti ' •••k. h., jr. 0 ..4".. ..."1--- Zialt..... FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS FOR POTENTIAL NEW OUTDOOR SPORTS FACILITIES IN SPOKANE VALLEY, WASHINGTON Page 18 GSL 3 . OP P RTU N IT? PNALYS I Overview For Olseunslon Purposes Only The potential development of new outdoor sports facilities in "� Spokane Valley at either the Plante's Ferry/East Valley High School I sites or the Ridgeline High School site would be expected to 4 ;_ a enhance the quality of baseball and softball field inventory serving -' `'.' " I t**_.: c:j I� l the Spokane Valley and greater Spokane County area. While, new r l l " r f L_ i, ifacilities would present an opportunity to draw in larger regional and '�national signature events, there are important distinctions between �' # f u s each potential development scenario that have the potential to 1. 1, y ^ ( I N impact both utilization and economic impact by the city of Spokane <. +'� -_ 1,,L , Valley. . , ., j 1 1)11L1- . .1.1 i As such, an essential element of this analysis is to explore potential j o ' ways to develop recommendations for the best financial investment 0 and use of the current land resources in order to attract economic " �" '! �l impact generating events to new outdoor sports facilities in Spokane „ ,. •�_ .. ,,rii„ s t Valley. r' I,` , } In order to provide guidance to the city of Spokane Valley and other ,, e.- rY,rw+ i:-, t stakeholders on potential market opportunities that could be � ti....1 ''/ • ! _ `1I pursued, we have summarized our outreach to local stakeholders .� '--. ' \.5...... r*IS-, l '' and user groups with a potential interest in utilizing new or improved t ' '_ outdoor sports facilities in Spokane Valley. f '�";',= �11t , } 4, ` riellar- FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS FOR POTENTIAL NEW OUTDOOR SPORTS FACILITIES IN SPOKANE VALLEY, WASHINGTON 7LPage 19 ✓` 3 . OPPORTUNITY ANALYSIS : SWO C An a ly i S Far Mscuss¢on Pu1Posee Only OPTION 1 : OPTION 2: PLANTE'S FERRY/EAST VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL SITES RIDGELINE HIGH SCHOOL SITE STRENGTHS STRENGTHS • Lower Acquisition/Development Cost— renovation, rather than new • Location &Accessibility — easy access into/out of site along Sprague development, of five fields at Plantes Ferry greatly reduces the upfront Avenue; approximately one mile from Interstate 90 access. capital cost. • Visibility —view corridors from Interstate 90. * Proximity to Spokane Valley Hotel Inventory — all Spokane Valley hotel properties within a short drive of either/both locations. • Single Location of Fields — single location of fields allows for maximizing operational efficiencies and enhanced marketability of the • Development/Operational Partnership— partnership with Spokane complex. County and East Valley School District would reduce upfront investment and limit risk associated with ongoing operations. • Parking and Support Facilities— configuration of fields provides an opportunity to develop parking, concessions, restrooms, shelters and other support facilities to maximize usage and attendee experience. FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS FOR POTENTIAL NEW OUTDOOR SPORTS FACILITIES IN SPOKANE VALLEY, WASHINGTON Page 20 14-.04;,7L 3 . OPPORTUNITY ANALYSIS : SWOC A For Discussion Purposes Only OPTION 1 : OPTION 2: PLANTE'S FERRY/EAST VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL SITES RIDGELINE HIGH SCHOOL SITE WEAKNESSES WEAKNESSES • Disconnected Sites —approximately two miles between sites, • Location on Periphery of City— proposed site is currently outside of connected by a two-lane road through a residential neighborhood. Spokane Valley city limits on the east side of the city. Most of the City's visitor industry infrastructure (e.g., restaurants, hotels, etc.) are located • Field Configuration — configuration of fields at Plante's Ferry does not closer to the center of Spokane Valley or on the western side of the City. allow for a natural central point; fields at East Valley High School in three Ideally, a sports tourism asset would be located closer to these assets. separate pods, with approximately one mile between the two furthest fields. • Cost to Acquire/Develop —cost to acquire and develop land significantly more expensive (two to three times more) than Plante's • Parking and Support Facilities— configuration of fields requires Ferry/East Valley High School sites. multiple parking lots to provide access to each complex and each field within each complex. • Limited Opportunity for Future Growth —field build-out, as contemplated, would render both sites landlocked and unable to expand further with additional fields or synergistic facilities. FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS FOR POTENTIAL NEW OUTDOOR SPORTS FACILITIES IN SPOKANE VALLEY, WASHINGTON f.rL Page 21 3 . OPPORTUNITY ASWOC Analysis Far Oiscussian Pucposes Only OPTION 1 : OPTION 2: PLANTE"S FERRY/EAST VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL SITES RIDGELINE HIGH SCHOOL SITE OPPORTUNITIES OPPORTUNITIES o Hotel Room Night Capture— non-local participants would likely have to • Marketability of Location — critical mass of fields at singular location, drive past significant inventory of Spokane Valley hotel properties if they proximity to Ridgeline High School's regular activity, visibility from 1-90 were to stay in Liberty Lake or the city of Spokane. and other factors suggest that sponsorship, advertising and other marketing opportunities may be more viable. o Redevelopment of Corridor Connecting Complexes-- long-term opportunities to redevelop Wellesley Avenue between two complexes ° Sprague Avenue Entrance— develop this corridor in such a way as to with mixed-use infrastructure to benefit attendees and area residents, encourage attendees to exit/enter from the west to increase the connectivity with Spokane Valley infrastructure. ° Investigate the Potential of a Liberty Lake Partnership--- mutually beneficial partnership with Liberty Lake based. on potential/actual economic impact generated within the city of Liberty Lake should be considered. FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS FOR POTENTIAL NEW OUTDOOR SPORTS FACILITIES IN SPOKANE VALLEY, WASHINGTON Page 22 `✓�~+� 3 . OPPORTUNITY ANALYSIS : SAnaIyss For Discussion Puiposes Only OPTION 1 : OPTION 2: PLANTE'S FERRY/EAST VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL SITES RIDGELINE HIGH SCHOOL SITE CHALLENGES CHALLENGES o Infrastructure improvements to Connect Sites —two-lane road • Liberty Lake Re-zoning Near Site — large vacant land parcels could be connecting two sites is primarily a residential corridor. May need to re-zoned by Liberty Lake to allow for mixed-use, commercial, hospitality consider additional infrastructure funds to enhance connectivity to or other development that could impact economic impact for the city of ensure safety and/or maximize economic impact capture. Spokane Valley. • Impact on Area Residents —traffic through residential neighborhood a Partnership with Liberty Lake—The potential for a partnership with nights and weekends along with utilization of lights at night could Liberty Lake is unknown. As such, all capital and operating costs must negatively impact area residents. be assumed to be borne by the City of Spokane Valley. • No Alcohol on School Grounds —would only be a challenge during large adult softball tournaments and other special events. o Availability of Funds for Capital Repair and Replacement—will be critical to incorporate funding of capital repair and replacement. With a project of this magnitude, careful consideration should be given to project phasing to ensure sufficient funds are available to maintain facilities to the highest levels. o Impact on Area Residents —traffic through residential neighborhood nights and weekends along with utilization of lights at night could negatively impact area residents. FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS FOR POTENTIAL NEW OUTDOOR SPORTS FACILITIES IN SPOKANE VALLEY, WASHINGTON SL Page 23 3 . OPPORTUNITY A NALYS I S Initial Con C l u s i o n s ror DI cucston Purnosos Only 1 . Configuration and Quality of Existing Fields Limits Appeal: Current Plante's Ferry fields not marketable for attracting significant non-local tournament activity. 2. Growing Local Need for Fields: Growing community demand for baseball and softball field access -- local programs turning kids away due to lack of field space. 3. Measurable Unmet Market Demand: Moderate to high demand levels noted among local and non-local softball and baseball organizers remains consistent with findings from previous market study. Demand supports consideration of new triangle field development in Spokane Valley. 4. Minimum of S Fields to Accommodate Existing Demand: An initial development of an eight (8) field complex consisting of six (6) youth baseball/softball fields with 225' fences and two (2) fields with 300' fences would be expected to satisfy existing demand, 5. Potential to Generate New Economic Spending: A central driving factor is the opportunity to generate economic impact through non-local spending. A Plante's Ferry/East Valley High School development scenario would be expected to provide natural synergies between the field locations and hotels, restaurants and other infrastructure. A Ridgeline High School development presents an opportunity to leverage a partnership with Liberty Lake and should be further explored. 6. Multi-Site Option Would Not Offer a Competitive Advantage: Other markets already offer the opportunity to compile 10+ fields at multiple complexes within the community. Tri-Cities offers up to 16 fields between Pasco Sporting Complex, Pasco Youth Baseball Complex and Southridge Sports Complex; the Spokane market offers 16 fields between Dwight Merkel, Franklin Park and Plante's Ferry. A similar product with fields/complexes at multiple locations would not provide Spokane Valley with a unique product to attract incremental non-local tournament participants. FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS FOR POTENTIAL NEW OUTDOOR SPORTS FACILITIES IN SPOKANE VALLEY, WASHINGTON Page 24 ✓`-�� 3 . OPPORTUNITY AUpdated ScenariosFor Discussion Purpasos Only Renovated Plante's Ferry Site Updated Ridgeline HS Site Upon delivery of the initial findings outlined previously, where it was -4_- ___ __ �_ i__.___ _ ___ __ _ ___ __ recommended that eight triangular fields would satisfy existing demand, a , `I P , i 1 „ third potential development option was presented involving a full = — = ' ' i . redevelopment of the Plante's Ferry Sports Complex. This scenario � ° i \c, •would involve development of eight (8) fully synthetic triangle fields each - - 1, - ' with LED field lighting suitable for adult/youth softball and youth baseball, , 1, ,, } -.' o- P-•- four (4) full-sized synthetic multipurpose rectangle fields with LED lighting •;1; } �� , I and six (6) renovated full-sized natural grass rectangle fields. {• ° ° � - .. ii/60/0/ ) •ALL _ This development scenario was envisioned as an alternative to the multi- ff - . , "�`" site solution presented previously through the development of new fields l - ..• . Odink i I, �oat East Valley High School and a partial renovation of Plante's Ferry. Y" _ Additionally, based on initial findings and updated projected construction t _ �_.,:_i___ �,1 al(i111-1- r ' - . Ii _cost estimates, the updates have also been presented for the Ridgeline ,; . rti , , r�� 4111 QHigh School scenario. This update reflects the near-term demand for an ,,eight-field complex with the potential to leverage RHS fields for larger • tournaments and events. Both of these development scenarios are p �. presented to the right. *-,,. "fitNcy a ,� fir . ' li" =:1 i ' Ng% 4 - i :Lk - 1 It is estimated that the Plantes Ferry Renovation Scenario would cost iAll � approximately $31.7 million, inclusive of an estimated $19.2 million ;�'} -y �` - \, _ g , • investment in triangle field-related renovations and $12.5 million in k% , �, • - j !, ■ multipurpose rectangle field renovations. The Plante's Ferry Renovation - �- _.-. would be jointly funded by the City of Spokane Valley and Spokane " -.4,4,' , ' . � ,, County. The updated RHS scenario is estimated to cost approximately �' ,,, $27.9 million. FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS FOR POTENTIAL NEW OUTDOOR SPORTS FACILITIES IN SPOKANE VALLEY, WASHINGTON � - .al Page 25 ✓k. 3 . c P P O RT LJ N I TY ANALYSIS : l - d Scenario Analysis I-Or Dr.cus ior,Purriosc:Only 1 . Similar Utilization and Economic Impact Profile: ,._.. offer eightfields at a single locationiti -(1 i.. - Both scenarios would fF r Id g — Triangle field event activity at PF may be impacted by rectangle field activity 4 y,� — Economic impactgeneration at PF maybe limited due to proximityto Spokane 4 ii P p _ ti — Economic impact generation at RHS may experience leakage to Liberty Lake L �,r 2. Construction Cost: , &iow ; c 0,r___ ,,,_.__.._1_. . - Estimated PF construction cost of $31.7 million I all \\e - Estimated RHS construction cost of $27.9 million ®7 Liiiii 1� iii , p pp p 3. Potential Future Expansion Opportunities: . _ . — PF site offers potential expansion across Trent Avenue; would be dependent on E � ability to secure access to the property T. — PF expansion would require additional funding to connect both sites � , — Expansion possibilities at RHS site somewhat limited _ r 1 tJ ZJ ? ,t• 1 4. Impact on Soccer/Rectangle Field Utilization: ,; `, =` rl — PF triangle field development dependent on reduction in rectangle field inventory - 'a' . 4 —,7 "--:-. -- PF rectangle field inventory reduced from 13 to 10 fields - S: _- t I — Four (4) of ten PF fields would be developed with synthetic turf and lights --.lc .'., . _. MkIIM FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS FOR POTENTIAL NEW OUTDOOR SPORTS FACILITIES IN SPOKANE VALLEY, WASHINGTON CSL Page 26 �•••++7 3 . OPPORTUNITY ANALYSIS : Rectangle FieId I m p a et For Discussion Purposes Only 1 . Local Utilization: :g. r 1111 . — Measurable capacity available at PF rectangle fields between 5 pm and 8 pm , ,_ `• -ti • Monday through Thursday (more limited in September) "' —Adding lights to four (4) fields would increase utilization by 1 to 2 hours per night, /r primarily increasing access for adult and/or older youth programs r4 j:,1, I' —Addition of four (4) synthetic turf fields would reduce the hours lost to field rest _ __ .. ,, ' - _ 2. Non-Local/Tournament Demand: .,, l_- r-,. f —Addition of four (4) synthetic turf fields would offer guaranteed games, increasing / .% likelihood of attracting non-local teams — Reduction in field inventory has potential impacts on tournament capacity, increasing 0' \ , 'i;, , '" �' the importance of creativity and flexibility in scheduling games �`AL-_._. ,., t ,„ i - Yi,ti_ lit 3. Impact from Spokane Polo Club Closure: '' ,' ,' ■qq■'1 - —Anticipated closure of fields to occur at completion of this season r,ii NN, • — Spokane Shadow considering options for new home field -- Large tournaments (e.g., Northwest Cup; River City Cup) require new home; potential ,, - - opportunity for complex(es) able to accommodate demand +. i; - . g‘,,,, '` . i , ( ) , FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS FOR POTENTIAL NEW OUTDOOR SPORTS FACILITIES IN SPOKANE VALLEY, WASHINGTON Page 27 ✓SL 3 . OP P ORTU N ITY ANALYSIS : SWOC C For olbcu.5sion Purposes Only PLANTE'S FERRY RENOVATION SCENARIO UPDATED RIDGELINE HIGH SCHOOL SCENARIO • Cost to Develop— $31.7 million ($19.2 million triangle field • Cost to Develop —$27.9 million (triangle field development only) development and $12.5 million rectangle field renovation/development) • Triangle Field Demand and Economic Impact—event activity and • Triangle Field Demand and Economic Impact— event activity and economic impact generated by non-local participants at triangle field economic impact generated by non-local participants at triangle field events expected to be consistent with Updated RHS scenario events expected to be consistent with PF renovation scenario • Rectangle Field Demand and Economic Impact-- conversion of four • Rectangle Field Demand and Economic Impact— no current existing fields to synthetic turf expected to extend seasons into months consideration of rectangle fields at RHS site. when resting fields historically had prevented play, while lights provide opportunities for additional evening hours (some youth, more adult play); however, field capacity reduction would limit number of teams able to practice weeknights (late evening hours availability not a benefit to youth play) and capacity of tournament play. Expansion across Trent Avenue may be expensive and would require acquisition of additional property. Current soccer club operator (Spokane Valley Junior Soccer Association) is believed to be operating and maintaining the fields to as high of a level as possible, given limited resources. Improvements and new turf will increase pressure to elevate product quality and operational efficiency. However, greater efficiencies may be able to be achieved through consolidation of management and operations of all fields at PF. FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS FOR POTENTIAL NEW OUTDOOR SPORTS FACILITIES IN SPOKANE VALLEY, WASHINGTON 7� Page 28 For DiSCUS51011 Purposes Only --- . 4 4 El '011 N .... 'N. ri r—c__ - C 7 Fl ID) I i I\I\ 1 (c,, C. 0 [I i lip) ii— 1 \\\\\L li— [1-- M 0.. r....e ,.. ,e - . -''-' ' '- -.6 1 k AN A __,Y,'----D_D _ L-----\) 0 , . I 6 : 1111.1 16 + 104 i 4 - *- , it'''-'' - .,•"•,• . S .• _-___ ,, ----:c'4 • -.... FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS FOR POTENTIAL NEW OUTDOOR SPORTS FACILITIES IN SPOKANE VALLEY, WASHINGTON Page 29 (,-,SL r, _ . 4 . COST/BENEFIT: Overview & Methods rui uisI-usslan Purposes On4y This section presents an analysis of estimated utilization and costs/benefits associated with potential new outdoor sports ,/ 9 OM facilities under each development scenario option. Initially, based on the results of the market demand and building program analyses, modeling and analysis was performed to generate performance estimates for the subject projects. Performance estimates for the project have been presented for the first few years of operations, through a stabilized year, which is assumed to occur by the fourth full year of operation. The analysis assumes a partnership with Spokane County to operate the Plante's Ferry/East Valley High School option and third-party private management for the Ridgeline High School option. It has been assumed that similar demand exists among local recreational, club and/or association leagues for youth and adults. As this study is intended to provide analysis as to the distinguishing characteristics between the two separate development options, specific consideration of local/league play has not been considered. A) COSTS (Construction & Operations) CSL performed a financial operating analysis for each of the potential new outdoor sports facilities development options. :µ Specifically, we developed a computer-based model incorporating comparable facility data and the estimated levels ofmamma.r utilization and attendance derived from the market analysis to generate estimates with regard to potential annual facility , `1,•-1 ,.i operating revenues and expenses. d4101. "` Revenues including rental, concessions, advertising and sponsorship revenues, and other such sources were estimated. Expenses including salaries/wages/benefits (including contracted services costs), utilities, maintenance & repair, materials & - �.. supplies, insurance, general & administrative, and others were estimated. The comparison of revenues and expenses enables ---- stakeholders to evaluate the level of facility-supportable revenues or public subsidies that may be required for annual facility8 operations. *, This presentation is designed to assist project representatives in assessing the financial effects of potential new outdoor sports `*_�`' facilities in Spokane Valley and cannot be considered a presentation of expected future results. Accordingly, the analysis of pair ` - -- r ! 4 eA c potential financial operating results may not be useful for other purposes. The assumptions disclosed herein are not all „ a inclusive, but are those deemed to be significant. Because events and circumstances frequently do not occur as expected, ” 01 V: \,. there usually will be differences between estimated and actual results and these differences may be material. FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS FOR POTENTIAL NEW OUTDOOR SPORTS FACILITIES IN SPOKANE VALLEY, WASHINGTON Page 30 � �SL 4 . COST/BENEFIT: Overview & Methods (continued) Far niscusslon Purposes only B) BENEFITS (Economic Impacts & Other) The ability of an amateur sports complex to generate A) Construction (one-time) B) In-Facility (ongoing) C) Out-of-Facility (ongoing) new spending and associated economic impact in a � i ail II community is often one of the primary determinants �' Di' t� , II I� regarding a decision by a public sector entity to participate in investing in the development and/or Construction materials, labor, design and Direct spending is generated through the Outside the subject facility itself, additional operation of sports tourism facilities. Beyond generating professional fees, and other soft cost operations of the subject facility direct spending is generated in city, county new visitation and associated spending in local spending are generated during the (represented through operating revenues) and regional areas by visitors, spectators, communities, amateur sports complexes also benefit a planning and construction of the subject driven by events and patronage, This attendees, participants,event staff, and facility spending occurs with respect to both event exhibitors on lodging,food and beverages. community in other important ways, such as providing and non-event items, such as rentals, retail, entertainment,transportation,etc. in venues for athletic and recreation activities attended and admissions, food and beverage, connection with their visit to the area. participated in by local community members and drawing merchandise, sponsorship and advertising, new visitation/traffic into core areas. education, and retail leases. The impact of an amateur sports complex project is 1. Direct Spending 1. Direct Spending 1. Direct Spending maximized when out-of-town athletes/participants and • Materials • Room&Space Rentals • Lodging family members or guests spend money in a community • Labor • Food&Beverage • Restaurants/Bars 2, Indirect& Induced Spending • Retail&Merchandise • Retail while visiting. This spending by visitors represents new 3. Output(direct+Indirect+Induced spending) • Entertainment • Entertainment/Gaming money to the community hosting the event. This new 4. Employment(rll&parr-tlmajobs) • Sponsorship&Advertising • Transit • Contract&Other Services • Services/Other money then creates multiplier effects as the initial 5. Earnings(personal Income) 2. Indirect & induced Spending 2. Indirect& Induced Spending spending is circulated throughout the local economy. 6. Tax Revenue 3. Output(direct+Indirect+Induced spending) 3. Output(direct+indirect+Induced spending) • Sales&use taxes 4. Employment(full&part-lime Jobs) 4. Employment poli&part-lime Jobs) It is important to note that spending estimates 5. Earnings(personal income) 5. Earnings(personal Income) associated withpotential new outdoor sports facilities 6. Tax Revenue 6. Tax Revenue p Sales&use taxes • Lodging taxes only represent spending that is estimated to be new to • Excise,gaming&other taxes • Sales&use taxes • Car etransittaxes Spokane Valley (net new spending), directly attributable • Excise,gaming&other taxes to the operation (and existence) of a new/improved facilities as part of the development options outlined. FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS FOR POTENTIAL NEW OUTDOOR SPORTS FACILITIES IN SPOKANE VALLEY, WASHINGTON 114,...;•‘41. Page 31 4 . CO S T/BENEFIT: Estimated Financial Operations For DIscusston Purposes Only The exhibit below presents a summary of projected annual financial operating results (excluding debt service) associated with a Renovation of Plante's Ferry (including development of eight new synthetic triangle fields, four synthetic turf rectangle fields and six natural grass rectangle fields) and a summary of the updated program for Ridgeline High School (including eight new synthetic triangle fields). Renovated Plante's Ferry Site Updated Ridgeline High School Site Opening Stabilized Opening Stabilized FINANCIAL OPERATIONS _ Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 OPERATING REVENUES In-House League Registration $63,600 $71,700 $80,100 $85,600 $63,600 $71,700 $80,100 $85,600 In-House Tournament Registration $145,600 $182,240 $220,800 $341,280 $145,600 $182,240 $220,800 $341,280 Rental Income $614,400 $729,700 $844,200 $919,800 $229,400 $301,400 $371,000 $418,400 Camps/Clinics $40,700 $58,400 $83,000 $88,300 $20,000 $37,100 $50,900 $52,300 Concessions $402,300 $491,800 $589,900 $672,900 $153,700 $226,900 $283,300 $344,200 Advertising/Sponsorship $46,900 $48,300 $50,100 $51,900 $29,200 $30,100 $31,200 $32,400 Other $75,000 $77,250 $79,568 $81,955 $35,000 $36,050 $37,132 $38,245 Subtotal $1,388,500 $1,659,390 $1,947,668 $2,241,735 $676,500 $885,490 $1,074,432 $1,312,425 OPERATING EXPENSES Salaries, Wages and Benefits $585,000 $595,900 $737,900 $760,000 $407,500 $415,100 $489,600 $504,300 Utilities $78,500 $80,900 $83,300 $85,800 $36,100 $37,200 $38,300 $39,500 Maintenance and Repair $98,200 $101,100 $104,200 $107,300 $45,100 $46,500 $47,900 $49,300 Materials and Supplies $137,500 $141,600 $145,800 $150,200 $63,200 $65,100 $67,000 $69,100 Insurance $78,500 $80,900 $83,300 $85,800 $36,100 $37,200 $38,300 $39,500 Concessions $321,800 $393,400 $471,900 $538,300 $92,200 $136,200 $170,000 $206,500 General and Administrative $120,000 $123,600 $127,300 $131,100 $65,000 $67,000 $69,000 $71,000 Tournament Expenses $58,240 $72,896 $88,320 $136,512 $58,240 $72,896 $88,320 $136,512 League Operations/Programming $75,100 $93,700 $117,400 $125,200 $60,200 $78,300 $94,300 $99,300 Management Fees $135,000 $139,100 $143,200 $147,500 $85,000 $87,600 $90,200 $92,900 Subtotal $1,687,840 $1,823,096 $2,102,620 $2,267,712 $948,640 $1,043,096 $1,192,920 $1,307,912 NET OPERATING INCOME ($299,340) ($163,706) ($154,953) ($25,977) ($272,140) ($157,606) ($118,489) $4,513 Capital Repair and Replacement Fund $687,500 $687,500 $687,500 $687,500 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 TOTAL NET INCOME!(LOSS)-City ($493,420) ($425,603) ($421,226) ($356,739) ($772,140) ($657,606) ($618,489) ($495,487) TOTAL NET INCOME!(LOSS)-County ($493,420) ($425,603) ($421,226) ($356,739) FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS FOR POTENTIAL NEW OUTDOOR SPORTS FACILITIES IN SPOKANE VALLEY, WASHINGTON Page 32 C.sSL 4 . COST/BENEFIT: Estimated Cost Comparison For Discussion Purposes only The exhibit below presents the total estimated costs in 2019 dollars that will likely be borne by Spokane Valley to implement each of the scenarios, for a stabilized year of operations (assumed to be the fourth full year of operations), as well as cumulative costs over the first 10 years of operations. Costs have been presented in terms of construction debt service (assuming the entire construction debt would be bonded debt) and operating subsidy needed per scenario. Specifically, a 30-year term and a 4.5 percent annual interest rate have been assumed for the hypothetical debt associated with each scenario. However, should there be an opportunity to utilize funding sources and financing mechanisms (in part or in full) that would limit the City's need to issue traditional bonded debt (in part or in full), the cost of capital could be reduced and overall annual costs would lower. A replacement reserve has been assumed to account for replacement of the synthetic turf fields (every approximately 12 years) and other major capital improvements that would be expected. OPTION 1: OPTION 2: Renovated Plante's Ferry Site Updated Ridgeline High School Stabilized Stabilized ESTIMATED COSTS Year 10- ear.Total Year 10- ear Total One-time Costs: Hard Construction Costs -- $23,600,000 -- $18,258,000 Soft Construction Costs -- 8,063,000 -- 6,238,000 Site/ Infrastructure Costs -- 0 -- 3.374,000 Total Public Sector Cost -- $31,663,000 -- $27,870,000 Ongoing Operations: Operating Revenues $2,241,735 $22,139,791 $1,312,425 $12,695,036 Operating Expenses 2,267,712 21,405,480 1,307,912 12,229,180 Operating Profit/(Loss) ($25,977) $734,311 $4,513 $465,856 Ongoing Costs: Debt Service $1,944,000 $19,440,000 $1,711,000 $17,110,000 Operations 25,977 (734,311) (4,513) (465,866) Capital Reserve Funding 687.500 6,875,000 500.000 5.000,000 Total Annual Costs —City $1,328,739 $12,790,345 $2,206,487 $21,644,144 Total Annual Costs — County $1,328,739 $12,790,345 FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS FOR POTENTIAL NEW OUTDOOR SPORTS FACILITIES IN SPOKANE VALLEY, WASHINGTON fl � Page 33 4 . COCOST/B CG ■ E N I` lic f(In a c il's (By Impact Type) For Discussion Purposes Only The exhibit below presents a summary of the annual projected economic impacts of renovating fields at Plante's Ferry and developing new field inventory at Ridgeline High School. Importantly, the projections represent net new spending that is not currently, or would not otherwise have occurred in Spokane Valley. Renovated Plante's Ferry Site Updated Ridgeline High School Site Opening Stabilized Opening Stabilized ECONOMIC IMPACT Year 1 Year 2 _ Year 3 Year 4 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 TOTAL NET NEW IMPACTS Net New Hotel Room Nights 7,872 10,712 13,393 15,488 4,603 7,361 9,149 11,097 Total Attendee Days 390,750 462,800 536,096 583,768 152,320 211,410 254,540 292,540 Net New Non-Local Visitor Days 45,366 62,907 78,618 91,499 28,418 45,529 56,610 68,730 Direct Spending $4,326,046 $5,844,311 $7,418,387 $8,768,786 $2,369,447 $3,767,465 $4,788,236 $5,965,854 Indirect/Induced Spending $2,957,733 $3,995,363 $5,071,126 $5,994,084 $1,619,615 $2,574,991 $3,272,604 $4,077,402 Economic Output $7,283,779 $9,839,673 $12,489,513 $14,762,869 $3,989,062 $6,342,456 $8,060,840 $10,043,256 Personal Income $2,996,345 $4,044,076 $5,130,226 $6,063,457 $1,641,653 $2,605,665 $3,310,436 $4,124,235 Employment(full & part-time jobs) 93 125 159 187 51 81 102 127 City Sales Tax (0.85%) $44,314 $59,865 $75,988 $89,820 $24,270 $38,590 $49,045 $61,107 City Hotel/Motel Tax (1.3%) $12,478 $17,254 $22,239 $26,378 $6,912 $11,383 $14,573 $18,206 Total Taxes $137,599 $186,284 $236,793 $279,987 $75,440 $120,342 $153,054 $190,744 FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS FOR POTENTIAL NEW OUTDOOR SPORTS FACILITIES IN SPOKANE VALLEY, WASHINGTONC� Page 34 7 rcf Discussion Purposes Only 4 . CT/B E N E : Economic impacts comparison The exhibit below presents a summary of the estimated annual economic impacts, in 2019 dollars, associated with the construction and operations of the potential development scenarios identified for new outdoor sports facilities in Spokane Valley. Estimated impacts relate only to net new visitor spending in the Spokane Valley market and does not include construction impacts. OPTION 1: OPTION 2: Renovated Plante's Ferry Site Updated Ridgeline High School ESTIMATED BENEFITS Stabilized Year 10- ear Total Stabilized Year 10- ear Total Attendance: Total Attendee Days 583,768 5,231,222 292,540 2,565,250 Total Non-Local Visitor Days 91,499 828,735 68,730 617,336 Total Hotel Room Nights 15,488 140,348 11,097 99,578 Ongoing Quantifiable Benefits: Direct Spending $8,768,786 $100,618,746 $5,965,854 $71,026,640 Indirect/Induced Spending 5,994,084 68,829,191 $4,077,402 $48,587,875 Total Output $14,762,869 $169,447,937 $10,043,256 $119,614,515 Personal Income (earnings) $6,063,457 $67,630,276 $4,124,235 $47,386,142 Employment (full & part-time jobs) 187 2,003 127 1,387 City Tax Revenue City Sales Tax (0.85%) $89,820 $1,030,774 $61,107 $727,626 City Hotel I Motel Tax (1.3%) $26,378 $254,012 $18,206 $173,877 FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS FOR POTENTIAL NEW OUTDOOR SPORTS FACILITIES IN SPOKANE VALLEY, WASHINGTON Page 35 SL 4 . COST/BENEFIT: Non-Quantifiable _Benefits Far Discussion Purposes OnIY • Enhanced sports and recreation opportunities for local youths and adults ' 11110 III --- -i-- rn.1 {_ . ,.:„,:,,, , iirn, • Reduction in the need for residents to leave Spokane Valleyfor sports, ' p p �, ,wy,< `� I recreation and entertainment activities - .; il 1 E !---- --C'' ' , - --- .__Ijj Q Improved wellness and other health outcomes for community members �' , 'y ,(4" 1 I97 ) • Inducement of ancillary/proximate private sector development Illiiii , ''----1 1 tic ' ;:: ,e [ • Synergy with the other sports, recreation, entertainment and leisure # lijin' ti; , facilities leading to increased tourism activity 7 ' :71 , _. I1 P , • Enhanced community pride, self-image, exposure and reputation , . '` ,;'° `•ci.; - ,_A-:.'...,-, 1 ,1,,..P . ',.•-' ,` V -, i • Enhanced regional exposure . ''' .,-."'" ''-'7- ' ...4e- - ir .r„4404,-,..: I,. -'i ."7 . .r / ,,, s�� b , ,.- _..„..._____, _ ., _.„.......,„,:, , .. , _ . . ;Ttornalixik. ,,,,.... . 1 „,---.,1-11.r. A - - -_~- � may' I j' ,,�� .' �' I r . - ii,:, ).- FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS FOR POTENTIAL NEW OUTDOOR SPORTS FACILITIES IN SPOKANE VALLEY, WASHINGTON LSI 36 s7 DRAFT ADVANCE AGENDA as of May 20,2020; 11:30 a.m. Please note this is a work in progress;items are tentative To: Council& Staff From: City Clerk,by direction of City Manager Re: Draft Schedule for Upcoming Council Meetings June 2,2020, Study Session,6:00 p.m. [due Tue May 261 ACTION ITEMS: 1.Motion Consideration: Interlocal Agreement, CDBG—Mike Basinger (15 minutes) NON-ACTION ITEMS: 2. COVID-19 Phase 2 Restaurant Operations—Jenny Nickerson (15 minutes) 3. COVID-19 Update Revenue Estimates— Chelsie Taylor (15 minutes) 4. Governance Manual Discussion—Chris Bainbridge, Cary Driskell (20 minutes) 5.Advance Agenda—Mayor Wick (5 minutes) 6. Info Only: Finance Monthly Report [*estimated meeting 70 mins] June 9,2020,Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Tue June 21 1. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 2.Admin Report: Graffiti—Cary Driskell, Legal Intern Aziza Foster (10 minutes) 3.Admin Report: Vaping—Erik Lamb (10 minutes) 4.Admin Report: Motorized Foot Scooters—Erik Lamb (10 minutes) 5.Admin Report: Advance Agenda—Mayor Wick (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting 40 mins] June 16,2020, Study Session,6:00 p.m. [due Tue June 9] 1.Aging&Long Term Care of Eastern Washington—Lynn Kimball,Executive Director (20 minutes) 2.Behavior Health Update—Chief Werner (15 minutes) 3. COVID-19 Impact on Parks&Recreation Summer Programs—Mike Stone (30 minutes) 4.Advance Agenda—Mayor Wick (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting 70 mins] June 23,2020,Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Tue June 161 1. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 2. Info Only: Department Monthly Reports June 30,2020, Study Session,6:00 p.m. [due Tue June 231 Oath of Office:Administered to New Police Chief 1.Advance Agenda—Mayor Wick (5 minutes) July 7,2020, Study Session,6:00 p.m. [due Tue June 301 1.Advance Agenda—Mayor Wick (5 minutes) July 14,2020,Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Tue July 71 1. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 2.Admin Report: Council Goals&Priorities for use of Lodging Tax— Chelsie Taylor (15 minutes) 3.Admin Report: Advance Agenda—Mayor Wick (5 minutes) July 21,2020, Study Session,6:00 p.m. 1due Tue July 141 1.Advance Agenda (5 minutes) July 28,2020,Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Tue July 211 1. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 2.Motion Consideration: Council Goals&Priorities for Use of Lodging Tax—Chelsie Taylor (10 minutes) Draft Advance Agenda 5/20/2020 2:08:13 PM Page 1 of 2 3.Admin Report: Advance Agenda—Mayor Wick (5 minutes) 4. Info Only: Department Monthly Reports August 4,2020, Special Meeting: Budget Workshop 8:30 a.m.—2:30 p.m. [due Tue July 281 August 4,2020,Study Session, 6:00 p.m. - Cancelled August 11,2020,Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Tue Aug 41 1. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 2.Admin Report: Advance Agenda—Mayor Wick (5 minutes) August 18,2020, Study Session,6:00 p.m. [due Tue Aug 111 1. Council 2021 Budget Goals—Chelsie Taylor (20 minutes) 2.Advance Agenda August 25,2020,Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. [clue Tue Aug 181 1. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 2.Admin Report: Advance Agenda—Mayor Wick (5 minutes) 3. Info Only: Department Monthly Reports Sept 1,2020, Study Session, 6:00 p.m. [due Tue Aug 251 1.Advance Agenda (5 minutes) Sept 8, 2020,Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Tue Sept 11 1. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 2.Admin Report: Estimated Revenues&Expenditures,2021 Budget— Chelsie Taylor (15 minutes) 3.Admin Report: Advance Agenda—Mayor Wick (5 minutes) Sept 15,2020, Study Session,6:00 p.m. [due Tue Sept 81 1. Outside Agency Presentation(max 5 minutes each)—Chelsie Taylor (—60 mins) 2.Advance Agenda Sept 22,2020,Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Tue Sept 151 1. Public Hearing#1 —2020 Budget Revenues and Property Taxes—Chelsie Taylor (15 minutes) 2. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 3.Motion Consideration: Set 2021 Budget Hearing #2 for Oct 27—Chelsie Taylor (5 minutes) 4.Admin Report: Advance Agenda—Mayor Wick (5 minutes) 5. Info Only: Department Monthly Reports Sept 29,2020, Study Session,6:00 p.m. [due Tue Sept 221 1.Advance Agenda *time for public or Council comments not included OTHER PENDING AND/OR UPCOMING ISSUES/MEETINGS: Appleway Trail Amenities Park Lighting Art Sculptures Placements PFD Presentation Artwork&Metal Boxes SPEC Report/Update Comp Plan Amendments St. Illumination(owners,cost,location) Donation Recognition St. O&M Pavement Preservation Fee Resolution Cost of Service Analysis Trunk or Treat Flashing Beacons/School Signage Utility Facilities in ROW Health District Re SV Stats Water Districts& Green Space Mirabeau Park Forestry Mgmt. Way Finding Signs Naming City Facilities Protocol Draft Advance Agenda 5/20/2020 2:08:13 PM Page 2 of 2 City of Spokane Valley Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 01/01/2020 - 04/30/2020 Page Title 1 Cover Sheet 2 Pre-Application Meetings Requested 3 Online Applications Received 4 Construction Applications Received 5 Land Use Applications Received 6 Construction Permits Issued 7 Land Use Applications Approved 8 Development Inspections Performed 9 Code Enforcement 10 Revenue 11 Building Permit Valuations Printed 05/08/2020 16:43 Page 1 of 11 Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 01/01/2020 - 04/30/2020 Pre-Application Meetings Requested A Pre-Application Meeting is a service provided to help our customers identify the code requirements related to their project proposal. Community& Public Works Department scheduled a total of 14 Pre-Application Meetings in April 2020. 30 20 10 1;ili 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Land Use Pre-Application = Commercial Pre-App Meeting Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Commercial Pre-App 6 10 11 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Land Use Pre-Application Meeting 9 13 6 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Monthly Totals 15 23 17 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Annual Total To-Date: 69 Printed 05/08/2020 16:43 Page 2 of 11 Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 01/01/2020 - 04/30/2020 Online Applications Received Community& Public Works Department received a total of 266 Online Applications in April 2020. 400 211111 I Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Trade Permit Right of Way Permit Pre-Application Meeting Request Demolition Permit Sign Permit Reroof Permit lin Other Online Applications = Approach Permit Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Approach Permit 0 0 2 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Demolition Permit 0 4 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other Online Applications 0 1 32 61 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pre-Application Meeting Request 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reroof Permit 5 25 29 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Right of Way Permit 37 51 41 51 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Permit 6 7 9 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Trade Permit 139 109 151 108 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Monthly Totals 187 197 265 268 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Annual Total To-Date: 917 Printed 05/08/2020 16:43 Page 3 of 11 Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 01/01/2020 - 04/30/2020 Constrwction Applications Received Community& Public Works Department received a total of 314 Construction Applications in April 2020. 600 4 400 III 200 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May ]un Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Commercial -New Commercial -TI Residential-New MT Other Construction Permits Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Commercial-New 24 70 22 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial-TI 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Residential-New 55 48 34 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial-Trade 13 16 12 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Residential-Trade 118 71 75 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Residential-Accessory 8 5 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Demolition 3 *7 *5 *5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign *10 *8 *10 *6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other Construction Permits 1 *232 *258 *322 *296 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Monthly Totals 463 483 489 314 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Annual Total To-Date: 1,749 *Includes Online Applications. Printed 05/08/2020 16:45 Page 4 of 11 Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 01/01/2020 - 04/30/2020 Land Use Applications Received Community& Public Works Department received a total of 81 Land Use Applications in April 2020. r 200 IIP 150 IIII 100 1 111 50 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Boundary Line Adjustment lel Binding Site Plan Preliminary State Environmental Policy Short Plat Preliminary Final Platting Act(SEPA) Long Plat Preliminary Zoning Map/Comp Plan Amendment Administrative Exception/Interpretation = Other Land Use Permits Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Boundary Line Adjustment 3 5 5 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Short Plat Preliminary 4 4 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Long Plat Preliminary 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Binding Site Plan Preliminary 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Platting 5 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Zoning Map/Comp Plan Amendment 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA) 3 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Administrative 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Exception/Interpretation Other Land Use Permits 68 146 93 *73 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - Monthly Totals 85 159 105 e I Annual Total To-Date: 430 *Includes Online Applications. Printed 05/08/2020 16:45 Page 5 of 11 Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 01/01/2020 - 04/30/2020 Construction Permits Issued Community& Public Works Department issued a total of 294 Construction Permits in April 2020. f 600 400 ;r14,-- _ I 200 6 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May ]un Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Commercial - New Commercial -TI Residential-New TM Other Construction Permits Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Commercial-New 23 49 25 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial-TI 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Residential- New 43 48 48 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial-Trade 13 16 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Residential-Trade 84 91 91 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Residential-Accessory 7 5 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Demolition 1 5 5 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign 6 10 11 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other Construction Permits 212 209 279 249 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Monthly Totals 390 433 472 294 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Annual Total To-Date: 1,589 Printed 05/08/2020 16:46 Page 6 of 11 Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 01/01/2020 - 04/30/2020 Land Use Applications Approved Community& Public Works Department approved a total of 0 Land Use Applications in April 2020. r 60 40 20 b 11111 r Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Boundary Line Adjustment i Binding Site Plan Preliminary State Environmental Policy Short Plat Preliminary Final Platting Act(SEPA) Long Plat Preliminary Zoning Map/Comp Plan Amendment Administrative Exception/Interpretation = Other Land Use Permits _ —1 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Boundary Line Adjustment 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Short Plat Preliminary 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Long Plat Preliminary 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Binding Site Plan Preliminary 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Platting 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Zoning Map/Comp Plan Amendment 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Administrative 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Exception/Interpretation Other Land Use Permits 23 39 41 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Monthly Totals 23 39 1 I 0 ei ` to a Annual Total To-Date: 103 Printed 05/08/2020 16:46 Page 7 of 11 Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 01/01/2020 - 04/30/2020 Development Inspections Performed Community& Public Works Department performed a total of 571 Development Inspections in April 2020. Development Inspections include building, planning, engineering and ROW inspections. I 2,000 1,500 1,000 500 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2018 2019 2020 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Totals 2020 999 1,180 1,232 571 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2019 1,113 772 1,050 1,402 1,417 1,363 1,300 1,485 1,285 1,525 1,139 1,030 2018 1,026 990 1,441 1,384 1,619 1,754 1,413 1,483 1,338 1,452 1,165 962 Printed 05/08/2020 16:48 Page 8 of 11 Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 01/01/2020 - 04/30/2020 Code Enforcement Code Enforcement Officers responded to 72 citizen requests in the month of April. They are listed by type below. Please remember that all complaints, even those that have no violation, must be investigated. r 100 li Pill" ,-- 1 50 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec IIII CE-Stop Work Order Environmental General Nuisance 1.11 Property Complaint, Non-Violation Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec CE-Stop Work Order 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Complaint,Non-Violation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Environmental 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 General 4 2 7 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Nuisance a 32 40 26 49 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Property 10 18 21 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Monthly TotalsEin MI AL,IMI 0 0 0 0 Annual Total To-Date: 233 Printed 05/08/2020 16:48 Page 9 of 11 Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 01/01/2020 - 04/30/2020 Revenue Community& Public Works Department Revenue totaled $237,120 in April 2020. 500,000 400,000 300,000 200,000 100,000 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep ❑ct Nov Dec 2020 2019 Five-Year Trend Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Totals 2020 $230,256 $402,862 $371,956 $237,120 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,242,194 Trend $159,604 $156,291 $228,212 $198,243 $251,439 $198,641 $204,983 $242,691 $194,002 $216,861 $192,571 $179,943 $2,423,484 2019 $162,441 $228,717 $265,529 $195,244 $241,906 $233,496 $355,943 $304,988 $228,157 $294,794 $299,906 $349,821 $3,160,942 2018 $177,431 $117,425 $220,845 $206,090 $234,009 $158,168 $260,179 $362,478 $253,342 $270,649 $204,016 $169,751 $2,634,383 2017 $174,349 $146,874 $133,382 $221,935 $309,558 $265,383 $134,394 $135,242 $149,194 $197,639 $232,319 $159,618 1$2,259,887 2016 $212,038 $183,405 $375,848 $187,053 $356,403 $229,293 $124,020 $264,735 $243,514 $163,819 $139,562 $124,778 1$2,604,468 2015 $71,763 $105,035 $145,457 $180,895 $115,321 $106,864 $150,381 $146,012 $95,805 $157,403 $87,053 $95,749 1$1,457,738 Printed 05/08/2020 16:50 Page 10 of 11 Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 01/01/2020 - 04/30/2020 Building Permit Valuation Community& Public Works Department Building Permit Valuation totaled $27,624,138 in April 2020. r 50,000,000 �I 40,000,000 30,000,000 20,000,000 10,000,000 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep ❑ct Nov Dec - 2020 2019 Five-Year Trend 1 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Totals 2020 $22.13M $20.94M $36.68M $27.62M $0.00M $0.00M $0.00M $0.00M $0.00M $0.00M $0.00M $0.00M $107.37M Trend $10.62M $17.16M $23.50M $15.92M $22.33M $20.71M $19.56M $20.58M $16.55M $14.51M $28.27M $13.64M $223.34M 2019 $5.66M $22.21M $19.46M $12.46M $23.15M $15.02M $46.65M $18.80M $14.36M $17.16M $35.18M $34.15M f $264.26M 2018 $12.84M $6.35M $27.60M $7.87M $9.55M $26.26M $29.25M $25.44M $20.69M $21.88M $25.46M $6.70M I $219.89M 2017 $23.82M $18.37M $6.98M $30.99M $35.66M $35.63M $9.78M $9.05M $8.88M $10.05M $67.10M $16.78M I $273.09M 2016 $7.83M $28.14M $55.63M $10.10M $36.56M $19.11M $7.07M $41.53M $33.68M $9.06M $7.76M $5.52M I $261.99M 2015 $2.93M $10.71M $7.82M $18.16M $6.73M $7.53M $5.05M $8.06M $5.15M $14.42M $5.86M $5.06M $97.48M Printed 05/08/2020 16:50 Page 11 of 11 Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 04/01/20 — 04/30/20 MAINTENANCE Agreements for Services Adopted and In Operation * Budget estimates ** Does not include April Contract Name Contractor 11 Contract Total % of Contract Amount Expended Expended Street Maintenance Poe Asphallimill $1,500,000.00 $10,067.59 0.67% II Street Sweeping AM Sweepingill $560,000.00 $65,050.61 11.62% II Storm Drain Cleaning AM Sweeping , $202,587.50 $9,310.50 4.60% II Landscaping Senske all $62,985.00 $4,776.11 7.58% Weed Spraying Clearwater $39,000.00 $0.00 0.00% Emergency Traffic Control Senske 11 $15,000.00 $3,457.78 23.05% II Litter and Weed Control Geiger Work Crew $70,000.00 $14,523.30 20.75% si State Highway Maintenance WSDOT • $265,000.00 $122,203.26 46.11% 1111 Traffic Signals, Signs, Striping Spokane County I $737,000.00 $111,081.12 15.07% Dead Animal Control Mike Pederson 1 $20,000.00 $3,300.00 16.50% ii Snow Season - October 2019 -April 2020 ■ In Call - Grader Multiple 1 $500,000.00 $76,062.32 15.21% iCin Call - Plow Drivers Multiple I $265,000.00 $105,336.80 39.75% ■ 1)n Call - Sidewalk Operator Valley Landscape $40,000.00 $5,593.38 13.98% Citizen Requests for Public Works - April 2020 Request Submitted In Progress Resolved i /Waiting Broken Sprinkler iiiMI 1 0 1 Construction - CPV' 4 0 4 Construction - Deve 1 0 1 Construction - Private I 1 0 1 Dead Animal Removal A 1 0 1 Downed Tree / Branch M 1 0 1 General Street Maint AIM 9 0 9 Gravel Shouldering ' 2 0 2 Hazard on Street 111= 3 0 3 llegal Dumping - 012, ..M 4 0 4 Wort a Pothole All 4 0 4 Wetation/Wil 3 1 2 SOLID WASTE M 1 0 1 TORMWATER M 6 4 2 Prffic IIIII 15 0 15 [Signs: Missing/ Damaged 1 17 0 17 Totals 1 STREET MAINTENANCE ACTIVITY The following is a summary of Contractor maintenance activities in the City of Spokane Valley for April 2020: • Geiger Work Crew— No operations. • Pothole patching. • Poe Maintenance Contract — Cracksealing, gravel road grading, patching and gravel shoulder repair. • AAA sweeping Contract—Arterial sweeping and residential sweeping • AAA Sweeping Vactor Contract — Cleaning drywells, sidewalk inlets and north/south arterial catch basins. WASTEWATER Status of the process can be monitored at: http://www.spokaneriver.net/, http://www.ecy.wa.gov/geographic/spokane/spokane river basin.htm, http://www.spokanecounty.org/utilities/WaterReclamation/content.aspx?c=2224 and http://www.spokaneriverpartners.com/ STORMWATER UTILITY The following is a summary of City Stormwater Utility activities for April 2020: • Continue Design Report task for the Drywell Retrofit with Pavement Preservation Water Quality Dept. of Ecology Agreement. Environmental tasks SEPA, and Inadvertent Discovery Plan and Cultural Resources are completed. • Spokane Valley Regional Decant Facility: Project Kickoff meeting with KPFF and WSDOT. KPFF begins project design. • Continued. In concert with the release of the revised Stormwater Management Manual for Eastern Washington (Dept. of Ecology), COSV Stormwater Utility began coordinated effort with City of Spokane, and Spokane County to evaluate the Spokane Regional Stormwater Manual for equivalency. • Submitted to Ecology progress and payment reports for the 4 stormwater grant projects. • Continue process to identify the merits for jurisdictional coverage under the UIC program. Begin subbasin delineation. • Continued updating the Stormwater Utility 0 & M plan. • Awarded the 2020 Roadway Landscape Maintenance contract. Senske Lawn and Tree Care. • Posted to website 2019 Annual Report and 2020 Stormwater Management Plan. • Participation and support Glenrose, Central Park Flood Insurance Study. • Continued annual management and/or participation of the following service contracts: o Roadway Landscape Maintenance Contract —Contract Awarded —Work underway- Senske. o Street Sweeping Contract—Work underway—AAA Sweeping. o Storm Drain Cleaning Contract—Work underway- AAA Sweeping. o Roadway Weed Control Contract—Work underway- Clearwater Summit • Continued working on the following tasks: o Responded to stormwater related issues, 6 sites. o Stormwater action requests 2020. 2 Current status to date is shown below: Stormwater Action Requests (Incl. Public and In-Staff Requests) April - 20 Total Requests Logged Since 2009: 631 2020 Completed Project sites: 6 Completed Projects 2009-2019: 288 Locations not warranting work: 260 Total Project Backlog: 83 DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING The following is a summary of Development Engineering activities for April 2020: • Assisted Building and Planning Division with preparation of design requirements for (5) Commercial and (10) Land Use Pre-Application meetings. • Prepared multiple Recommended Conditions of Approvals for preliminary plats and Dedication Languages for final plats. Reviewed multiple final plats and submittal packages to record final plats. • Reviewed civil plans and drainage reports for Engineered Grading Permits associated with commercial and land use projects. Coordinated with private Engineers and Developers. • Reviewed civil plans for the following projects: o Sammy's Pit Stop (EGR-2019-0083) o The Elks -Grading Only (EGR-2019-0086) o Empire Physicians Clinic (EGR-2020-0009) o Raugust Parking Lot (EGR-2020-0010) o Mansfield Townhomes (EGR-2020-0012) o Flora Road Apartments (EGR-2020-0014) o Quarry Apartments (EGR-2020-0015) o Barker Mini Storage (EGR-2020-0016) o Barker Retail (EGR-2020-0017) o Boone Ave Short Plat—7 lots (EGR-2020-0018) o Pacific Way Alley (EGR-2020-0019) o 15th Ave Short Plat—3 lots (EGR-2020-0021) o Moskalenko Short Plat—5 lots (EGR-2020-0022) o Spokane Conservation District Office (EGR-2020-0024) o Dolphin Commercial Center (EGR-2020-0026) o Garland Avenue Improvements (EGR-2020-0027) o Albo Short Plat—5 lots (EGR-2020-0028) o Cirrus Storage (EGR-2020-0029) o Coast Aluminum (EGR-2020-0030) o Audi Spokane —Shop Expansion (EGR-2020-0031) o Sprague Avenue Office & Retail (EGR-2020-0032) o Lenora Drive Short Plat—4 lots (EGR-2020-0033) o TAPA Business Park— Lot 9 (EGR-2020-0034) o TAPA Business Park— Lot 1 (EGR-2020-0035) o Spokane Metals Shell Building (EGR-2020-0036) • Spoke with and emailed citizens and developers to answer inquiries and discuss design requirements for potential commercial and land use projects. • Conducted preconstruction meetings, performed site visits, prepared punch lists, reviewed surety estimates, and reviewed and approved construction certification packages to finalize final plats and to issue commercial building certificates of occupancy. 3 CAPITAL PROJECTS "1.31 Public Works Projects Monthly Summary-Design&Construction raj . April-2020 Bid Estimated Total Project Proposed %Complete # Design&Construction Projects Funding Ad Date Open Construction Project Date PE I CN Completion Cost Street Projects 0143 Barker Rd/BNSF Grade Separation FHWA-STP(U) TBD TBD 100 0 12/31/22 $24,600,000 0249 Sullivan&Wellesley Intersection Improv FHWA-STP(U) TBD TBD 90 0 12/31/20 $ 1,370,000 0275 Barker Rd Widening-River to Euclid FHWA-STP(U) TBD TBD 100 0 12/31/21 $ 3,190,800 0291 Adams Sidewalk Infill Project TIB-SP 02/28/20 03/20/20 100 1 12/31/20 $ 507,051 0295 Garland Avenue Extension COSV 04/05/19 04/19/19 100 50 12/31/20 $ 2,900,000 0302 Ella Sidewalk:Broadway to Alki CDBG 02/28/20 03/20/20 100 2 11/01/20 $ 431,487 0303 S.Conklin Road Sidewalk CDBG 02/28/20 03/20/20 100 0 11/01/20 $ 179,520 0309 Local Access Streets:Barker Homes COSV 04/24/20 05/20/20 100 0 12/31/20 $ 1,500,000 0310 Sullivan Rd Overcrossing UP RR Deck Rep. FHWA-BR TBD TBD 0 0 12/31/20 $ 337,625 0313 Barker Road/Union Pacific Crossing FMSIB TBD TBD 90 0 12/31/22 $ 1,434,000 Street Preservation Projects 0267 Mission SW-Bowdish to Union TIB-SP 03/01/19 03/22/19 100 98 12/31/19 $ 2,196,922 0269 Evergreen-Mission Connector to Indiana FHWA-STP(U) 04/05/19 04/26/19 100 98 12/31/19 $ 822,050 0285 Indiana Ave Pres-Evergreen to Sullivan COSV 03/06/20 03/20/20 100 1 12/31/20 $ 2,343,166 Traffic Projects 0259 North Sullivan ITS Project FHWA-CMAQ 02/14/20 03/06/20 100 0 12/31/20 $ 1,104,209 0293 2018CSS Citywide Reflective Signal BP HSIP N/A N/A 100 3 12/31/21 $ 180,000 0294 Citywide Reflective Post Panels HSIP N/A N/A 100 1 12/31/21 $ 78,000 0300 Pines&Mission Intersection Improvement(Ph.1) FHWA-CMAQ TBD TBD 0 0 12/31/2020 $ 588,000 Parks Projects 0268 Appleway Trail-Evergreen to Sullivan FHWA-STP(U) 06/28/19 07/19/19 100 70 12/31/20 $ 2,516,550 0304 CenterPlace West Lawn Phase 2 COSV 11/22/19 12/20/19 100 10 12/31/20 $ 2,000,000 0305 CenterPlace Roof Repair COSV 05/01/20 05/15/20 100 0 07/01/20 $ 571,000 Design Total Project %Complete # Design Only Projects Funding Complete Project Date PE Cost Street Projects 0205 Sprague/Barker Intersection Improvement COSV 12/31/20 24 $ 142,021 0223 Pines Rd Underpass @ BNSF&Trent COSV TBD 27 $ 1,710,000 0273 Barker/I-90 Interchange TBD 97 $ 900,000 0299 Argonne Rd Concrete Pvmt Indiana to Mont TIB-UAP TBD 17 $ 2,825,000 0301 Park&Mission Intersection Improvements COSV TBD 0 $ 153,500 0311 Sullivan Rd./SR 290 Interchange Project COSV 12/31/23 0 $ 500,000 Street Preservation Projects 0286 Broadway Preservation:Havana to Fancher COSV TBD 65 $ 100,000 0292 Mullan Preservation:Broadway-Mission COSV TBD 25 $ 75,000 4 PLANNING AND GRANTS WSDOT's City Safety Program WSDOT administers the federal Highway Safety Improvement Program and funds projects under the City Safety Program (CSP). In November 2019, WSDOT announced the CSP call for projects, making available $25 million statewide for projects that address data-driven safety improvements. In February 2020, City Council authorized the City Manager to submit 6 projects ranging in cost from $165,000 up to $2,000,000, generating a total program request of$4,424,200, with a $20,400 City match (5% local match). Applications were submitted on March 3, 2020 and due March 6, 2020.Awards are anticipated by October 2020. Washington State Department of Commerce Electrification Transportation Systems Grant Program Spokane Regional Transportation Council and Avista Corp. have partnered to submit a regional application for the installation of electric vehicle charging stations for public use.The City would participate by applying to install charging stations at City Hall and CenterPlace. Avista will be responsible for all matching costs required by the grant program. The City would be responsible for any ongoing operations and maintenance costs associated with the charging stations.On April 14, 2020, City Council authorized the City Manager to partner with SRTC and Avista to submit an application. Applications are due July 1, 2020. USDOT's BUILD Program USDOT administers the Better Utilizing Investment to Leverage Development (BUILD) discretionary grant program. On February 18, 2020, USDOT announced its current call for projects, making available $1 billion for capital projects. On April 14, 2020, City Council authorized the City Manager to submit an application for the Pines/BNSF GSP to BUILD.The City's application was submitted on May 13,2020.Awards expected by September 15, 2020. WSDOT's: Safe Routes To School (SRTS) and Pedestrian and Bicyclist Program (PBP) WSDOT administers two parallel funding programs to improve safety for pedestrians and bicyclists. PBP makes available approximately$18 million and applications are due July 13, 2020. SRTS makes available approximately $19 million and applications are due July 20, 2020. Award announcements are issued during winter 2020, likely by December 2020. However,funding award isn't formalized until it is adopted as part of the state's budget for the 2021-2023 biennium. Funding will be available for the 2021-2023 biennium beginning July 2021. Staff will bring forward recommended project applications at a future City Council meeting in June 2020. Pavement Management Update Public Outreach& Education On October 29, 2019, staff received Council consensus to move forward with an ad-hoc committee for input regarding the City's pavement management program. Staff will work with the Mayor's office to develop a recommended committee membership program and roster.This information will be brought forward to council for a motion to create and appoint the committee and its members. Further, this outreach process will be contingent upon StreetScan's pavement condition survey work, see below for more details. StreetScan—Pavement Condition Evaluation In September 2019, StreetScan surveyed 100% of the City's street network to evaluate its current condition. Final findings and reporting of the pavement condition survey has been shared with City staff and a final quality assurance review has occurred through the months of March and April. Final delivery is anticipated in May 2020, when staff will be available to present the findings to City Council. 5