2020, 06-30 Study Session AGENDA
SPOKANE VALLEY CITY COUNCIL
STUDY SESSION FORMAT
Tuesday,June 30,2020 6:00 p.m.
CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
10210 E Sprague Avenue
(Please Silence Your Cell Phones During the Meeting)
NOTE: In response to Governor Inslee's March 24, 2020 Proclamation concerning our recent State of
Emergency, which waives and suspends the requirement to hold in-person meetings and provides options
for the public to attend remotely, all meeting guidelines contained in the Governance Manual are hereby
superseded until the Governor's order has been rescinded or amended.Therefore,effective immediately and
until further notice,a live feed of the meeting will be available on our website and on Comcast channel 14.
Public comments will be accepted via the following links and must be received by 4:00 pm the day of
the meeting.
• Sign up to Provide Oral Public Comment at the Meeting via Calling-In
• Submit Written Public Comment Prior to the Meeting
• Join the Zoom Meeting
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Oath of Office:Administered to Incoming Police Chief Dave Ellis by City Clerk Bainbridge
Proclamation: In Support of our Police Officers
ACTION ITEMS:
1.Motion Consideration: Potential Grant Opportunities, Pedestrian/Bike Safe Routes to School—Adam
Jackson [public comment]
2.Motion Consideration: Memorandum of Understanding With Spokane County regarding COVID-19—
Cary Driskell [public comment]
3. Motion Consideration: Department of Transportation Construction Contract,Barker Grade Separation
Project—Bill Helbig [public comment]
NON-ACTION ITEMS:
DISCUSSION LEADER SUBJECT/ACTIVITY GOAL
4. Chad Knodel Technology of Remote Council Meetings Discussion/Information
5.Adam Jackson Potential Grant Opportunity: Transportation Discussion/Information
Improvement Board(TIB)
6. Erik Lamb, Carly Johnson Motorized Foot Scooters Discussion/Information
Legal Intern
7. Erik Lamb Vapor Product Retail Sales Discussion/Information
8.Mayor Wick Advance Agenda Discussion/Information
Study Session Agenda June 30,2020 Page 1 of 2
9. Information Only(will not be reported or discussed):
a. Finance Department Monthly Report b. Police Department Monthly Report
10.Mayor Wick Council Check in Discussion/Information
11.Mark Calhoun City Manager Comments Discussion/Information
ADJOURN
Study Session Agenda June 30,2020 Page 2 of 2
siTioka4e\ft...
40,00Valley
rocramation
City of Spo4ne Valley, Washington
Support of Spo4ne Valley ToCice Department Tersonne`
WHEREAS, the City of Spokane Valley has entered into an agreement with Spokane County for
law enforcement services through the Spokane Valley Police Department, the latest of which was
approved in July of 2017; and
WHEREAS, the Spokane Valley Police Department received accreditation from the Washington
Association of Sheriffs and Police Chiefs (WASPC), which reflects a determination that the
agency is "certified as operating under industry best practices and standards." The accreditation
program is intended to"reflect the highest professional standards of policing...;" and
WHEREAS,the Spokane Valley Police Department adopted policies to accomplish the rigorous
accreditation by WASPC, and these policies can be found on the Spokane County Sheriff's
website. These policies specifically identify policing practices to be used in an effort to keep
citizens and officers safe, and the Department will continue to strive to adopt and utilize new best
practices as they evolve over time; and
WHEREAS, we acknowledge and appreciate the brave men and women who work to keep us
safe; that they often must make split-second decisions that could save a life or property, and
therefore they deserve our praise and support; and
WHEREAS, we believe law enforcement is essential to maintaining our freedom, and we firmly
support our officers who put their lives at risk every day to serve and protect our citizens.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that I, Ben Wick, Mayor of Spokane Valley, on
behalf of the citizens and Council of Spokane Valley, do hereby proclaim our sincere appreciation
and strong support of the Spokane Valley Police Department, its officers and support staff, and
acknowledge that the hard work and diligence of these individuals is deeply appreciated by this
Council and the citizens we represent.
Dated this day of June, 2020.
Ben Wick,Mayor
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: June 30, 2020 Department Director Approval:
Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ® new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Motion Consideration: Potential Grant Opportunity— Pedestrian &
Bicycle Program (PBP) and Safe Routes to School (SRTS)
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 35.77.010: Six Year Transportation Improvement Program
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN:
• February 18, 2020 — City Council authorized the City Manager to apply to the 2020 City
Safety Program (CSP) call for projects, including sidewalk improvements on 8th Avenue
at Park Road, 8th Avenue at Sullivan Road, and Bowdish Road at 16th Avenue.
• May 26, 2020 —Adoption of Resolution 20-009 adopting the 2021-2026 Six-Year
Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP)
• June 9, 2020 —Administrative Report discussing potential projects for PBP and SRTS.
BACKGROUND: In April 2020, the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT)
issued a call for projects for the PBP and SRTS that aim to improve safety and increase the
number of people walking or bicycling. Both programs use a weighted evaluation process to
score projects: safety (40%), equity (16%), value (14%), deliverability (12%), and quality (18%).
Both funding programs share the same application; however a single project must apply to only
one of the programs, not both. Critical program details are:
PBP SRTS
Total Available Program Funds: $18.4M $19.2M
Funding Type (State/Federal) State State and/or Federal
2018 Award Range: $50k - $2M $125k - $2.5M
Match Amount: No match required, preference given to projects with match
Application Due Date: July 13, 2020 July 20, 2020
Award Date: Recommendations to Governor by 12/2020, formally
awarded in June 2020 as part of 2021-2023 state budget.
On June 9, 2020, staff proposed six projects for consideration to City Council. From that list,
City Council provided consensus to pursue three of the six projects (Table 1).
Table 1: Prioritized Projects for Application
PBP Estimated Requested Local
Project Name/Description or Preliminary Amount Match
SRTS Total Cost (80%) (20%)
PBP-1. Appleway Trail Crossing at Sprague PBP $ 550,000 $ 440,000 $ 110,000
Avenue: City Hall to Balfour Park
SRTS-1. Sidewalk Improvements: SRTS $ 700,000 $ 560,000 $ 140,000
Bowdish Rd. from 12th to 16th
SRTS-2. Sidewalk &Crossing Improvements: SRTS $ 950,000 $ 760,000 $ 190,000
Bowdish Rd. from 16th to 22th
Total $ 2,200,000 $ 1,760,000 $ 440,000
OPTIONS: 1) Proceed with the proposed project list and motion as written, 2) take other
appropriate action.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to authorize the City Manager or designee to
apply for the Pedestrian & Bicycle Program and Safe Routes to School Program grants for the
three projects identified in Table 1.
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Dependent upon the individual projects. The project costs
included are conservative to show the potential City matching responsibility should awards be
granted. The presented project costs conservatively assume the City is awarded all three
projects. However, it is most likely that the City would only receive one, if any, project awards. It
would be highly unlikely that the City would be awarded 2 or three project awards.
STAFF CONTACT: Adam Jackson, P.E. — Engineer— Planning & Grants
ATTACHMENTS: None
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: June 30, 2020 Department Director Approval:
Check all that apply: ❑consent ❑old business ®new business ❑public hearing
❑information ❑admin.report ❑pending legislation ❑executive session
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Motion Consideration: Proposed Memorandum of Understanding Regarding
Establishment of COVID-19 Recovery Group.
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 35A.11.020.
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: None.
BACKGROUND: Various staff and elected officials throughout the region have met regularly since the
onset of the coronavirus pandemic in March,2020,to discuss impacts and potential impacts of the pandemic
on the residents and businesses in the respective communities across Spokane County, as well as ways
governmental entities can assist in resolving such issues. Each entity has certain responsibilities within
their own jurisdictional borders, but some of these responsibilities can be done more effectively and
efficiently through a combined effort, and in that vein, Spokane County has proposed formation of a work
group to address COVID-19 related issues. The County has provided the attached draft memorandum of
understanding (MOU) to establish the parameters of what the group would do, who would be members,
and other related terms.
Staff received the draft MOU mid-afternoon on Tuesday, May 26, and were advised that attorney Jim
Emacio for Spokane County would be finalizing the draft on Monday, June 1. As such, staff had a track
changes draft done on Friday,May 29 and circulated to appropriate internal staff. We then sent that marked
up draft to Mr. Emacio on Monday,June 1. Mr. Emacio responded back that same day stating the time for
comment expired on May 29,that he had received other comments (presumably from Spokane), and that
the Board of County Commissioners(BoCC)would consider the proposed MOU later that day without any
of the recommended changes from anybody. We subsequently received notice that the BoCC did adopt the
MOU without amendment.
City staff believe there are changes to the document that are either necessary or appropriate. A copy of the
track changes draft is included in the packet for discussion. The areas of recommended change are as
follows:
1. On page one, Background, suggested additional language to either clarify or strengthen existing
language.
2. On page two, section(1)(a),Creation of COVID-19 Recovery Group,brought the information from a
footnote into the body of the section for clarity. Additionally,changed the titles of the identified members
to more accurately reflect their actual titles. On sub (b), changed the number from 11 members to 12,
which is the actual number of members identified.
3. On page three, added language to the statement that mayors who attend could only be non-voting
members of the Group. The new language reflects Spokane Valley's form of government in that our
Mayor is like any other Councilmember,unlike Spokane. For example,if Mayor Wick was chosen to be
the City's representative identified as#12 in sub(b),then he would have voting rights.
4. On page 3, immediately above the "Responsibilities" section, staff recommends removing the
prohibition on use of proxies to attend and act in that person's stead. Not allowing proxies will likely
lead to meetings without a quorum necessary to conduct business.
5. On page 3,under"Responsibilities," staff recommends adding a new subsection that allows analysis
of other matters that may arise that three-quarters of the parties agree is appropriate to consider. This
would allow some flexibility as new and important issues arise. Amending the MOU would not be timely
for addressing such things.
OPTIONS: (1)Approve the language as requested by Spokane County without changes; (2) approve the
language with the changes recommended by City staff; or(3)take other action as appropriate.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: I move we authorize the City Manager to finalize and
execute the proposed Memorandum of Understanding for Establishment of the COVID-19 Recovery
Group,with the changes proposed by staff as reflected in the revised draft.
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS:Unknown,but there are not anticipated to be related to the formation
of this Group.
STAFF CONTACT: Cary Driskell, City Attorney;Mark Calhoun, City Manager.
ATTACHMENTS:
(1) Track changes draft MOU for Establishment of the COVID-19 Recovery Group;
(2)Related documents from Spokane County relating to formation of the MOU.
�pA t
S P O K A N E - t` ,4.° .. x C O U N T Y
OFFICE OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
JOSH KERNS,1ST DISTRICT•MARY L KUNEY,2ND DISTRICT•AL FRENCH,3RD DISTRICT
May 26,2020
Mr.Wes Crago,City Administrator Ms.Amelia Clark,Administrator
City of Spokane Spokane Regional Health District
808 West Spokane Falls Boulevard 1101 W.College Avenue
Spokane,Washington 99201 Spokane,Washington 99201
Mr.Mark Calhoun,City Manager Ms.Alisha Benson,Chief Executive Officer
City of Spokane Valley Greater Spokane Incorporated
10210 E.Sprague Avenue 801 W.Riverside Avenue,Suite 100
Spokane Valley,Washington 99206 Spokane,Washington 99201
Re: Memorandum of Understanding Regarding establishment of COVID-19 RECOVERY
GROUP
Dear Addresses:
This correspondence will act as a Memorandum of Understanding ("MOU") among Spokane
County ("County"), City of Spokane ("City"), City of Spokane Valley ("COV"), Spokane
Regional Health District("SRHD")and Greater Spokane Incorporated("GSI"),jointly"Parties",
with respect to the creation of the COVID-19 Recovery Group("COVID-19 Recovery Group").
BACKGROUND
A Strategic Planning Group was informally created in conjunction with the Emergency Operations
Center("EOC")responding to the COVID-19 pandemic in Spokane County. The function of the
Strategic Planning Group was to plan for the region's long range response to the COVID-19
pandemic over the next year,including relevant milestone periods.a 30/60/90/180 or longer time
frame. The EOC is preparing to stand down in conjunction with the COVID-19 pandemic as the
nature of the regional response continues to evolve. Due to the unique circumstances of the
COVID-19 pandemic,resulting in the activation of the EOC,there is need for initial oversight of
on-going efforts concentrating on the long-term sustainability of the regional COVID-19 recovery.
The EOC's primary responsibility is to provide emergency response support and is not directly
authorized for long term recovery efforts. It is the intent of the Parties to create an entity to be
known as the COVID-19 Recovery Group, which is intended to have having certain
responsibilities regarding the regionalcontinued recovery within Spokane County tofrom the
COVID-19 pandemic.
The Parties desire to enter into a MOU setting forth their respective commitments with respect to
the formation and participation is the COVID-19 Recovery Group.
1116 WEST BROADWAY AVENUE • SPOKANE,WASHINGTON 99260-0100 • (509)477-2265
Mr.Wes Crago
Ms.Amelia Clark
Mr.Mark Calhoun
Ms.Alisha Benson
May 26,2020
Page 2
PURPOSE
The purpose of this MOU is to reduce to writing the Parties respective commitments with regard
to the formation and participation in the COVID-19 Recovery Group.
Pursuant to the terms of this MOU,the Parties understand and agree as follows:
(1) CREATION OF COVID-19 RECOVERY GROUP:
There is hereby created an entity to be known as the COVID-19 Recovery Group. The
COVID-19 Recovery Group shall be comprised of the following members:
(a) Present membership of the Regional Governance Workgroup established between
Spokane County and the City of Spokane pursuant to the interlocal agreement adopted
as Spokane County Resolution 16-0755 and City of Spokane document OPR 2015-
0074,which}-consistsiug of the following seven(7)members:
1.Spokane County Commissioner(1)
2.Spokane County Chief Executive OfficerCEO
3.Spokane County Chief Financial OfficerCFO
4.Spokane City Administrator
5.Spokane City Chief Financial OffierCFO
6.Spokane City Council member
7.City of Spokane Valley City ManagerAdministrator
}ILA filed under Spokane County kesolution No. 16 0755 and City of Spokane document /(Commented[Coi]:It is easier to read and understand by
OPR 2015 0071. putting the information in the paragraph rather than as a footnote.
(b)In addition to the above seven(7)members,the following five(5)members shall be
added for a total of twelvecleven(14-2)members:
8-9.Spokane County Commissioner(2)
10.Spokane Regional Health District Administrator
11.Greater Spokane Incorporated CEO
12.Representative from City of Spokane Valley legislative body
Mayors of cities within Spokane County may attend and participate in COVID-19 Recovery
Group meetings but they will be non-voting members on any item considered by the Recovery
Mr.Wes Crago
Ms.Amelia Clark
Mr.Mark Calhoun
Ms.Alisha Benson
May 26,2020
Page 3
Group. The exception to this would be if Spokane Valley's Mayor were chosen as the
representative from the Spokane Valley legislative body, since their Mayor is also a
Councilmember.
(c)The COVID-19 Recovery Group will be facilitated by the Spokane County Department
of Emergency Management("DEM")Director,or designee(s)("Facilitator")who shall
be a non-voting member of the Recovery Group. DEM will also be the primary liaison
among the Parties to the Recovery Group. Any costs associated with the Facilitator
shall be borne by the County through the DEM. Additionally,topical subject matter
experts("SME")may be asked to participate in meeting(s)as non-voting members.
(OVID-19 Recovery Group members identified in(1)(a),(b)or any Mayor of a city within
Spokane County who desires to attend and participate in a COVID-19 Recovery Group
meeting,may not designate alternate individuals Ito attend any meeting and act in his/her / Commented[CD2]:Why not allow any alternates or proxy?
capacity on any matter coming before the COVID-19 Recovery Group. This coma prove very problematic for making whatever decisions
are permissible under the interlocal.
- Commented[CD3]:This paragraph has different margin spacing
(2) RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE COVID-19 RECOVERY GROUP; than the prior paragraph.
The COVID-19 Recovery Group shall have the following responsibilities:
a. Providing recommendations to the appropriate Parties related to on-going COVID-
19 response work;;
b. Identifying key community recovery indictors for disease resurgence and/or
community issues with Parties;;
c. Monitoring key community recovery indicators for disease resurgence and/or
community issues (i.e. increased reliance on food banks, etc.) and making
recommendations to the appropriate Parties;,and
d. Deliberating, providing guidance and making recommendations on policy, and
intergovernmental agreements to the appropriate Parties relative to COVID-19
matters;and,
d-e.Other matters that are deemed reasonable and appropriate, as agreed by at least
three-fourths of the Recovery Group,in response to emergent issues.
(3) Consistent with the provisions of chapter 39.34 RCW, the Parties agree and
acknowledge as follows:
A. Duration: The term of the MOU shall commence as of the date of the last signatory
and run until December 31,2020,unless extended by mutual written agreement of
the Parties
B. Separate Legal Entity: This MOU does not create,nor seek to create,a separate
legal entity pursuant to RCW 39.34.030.
Mr.Wes Crago
Ms.Amelia Clark
Mr.Mark Calhoun
Ms.Alisha Benson
May 26,2020
Page 4
C. Responsibilities of the Parties: See provisions above.
D. Agreement to be Filed: Parties shall be responsible for filing this MOU as provided
for in RCW 39.34.040.
E. Financing: Except as provided in the MOU related to the cost of the Facilitator,all
Parties shall be solely responsible for financing its obligations under this MOU.
F. Property upon Termination: Title to all personal property acquired by any party in
performance of the MOU shall remain with the acquiring party upon termination of
the MOU.
The County's execution of this MOU shall act as its agreement with all the terms and conditions
set forth herein.
The City of Spokane's,City of Spokane Valley's,Spokane Regional Health District's,and Greater
Spokane Inc.'s respective execution of this MOU in the space provided hereinafter shall act its
agreement with all the terms and conditions set forth herein.
This MOU may be executed in counterparts,each of which when so executed and delivered shall
be an original,but such counterparts shall constitute one and the same.
Very truly yours,
AL FRENCH,Chair JOSH KERNS,Vice Chair MARY L.KUNEY,Commissioner
ATTEST:
CLERK OF THE BOARD
Ginna Vasquez
**********
Reviewed and agreed to this day of ,2020.
City of Spokane
By:
Title:
Mr.Wes Crago
Ms.Amelia Clark
Mr.Mark Calhoun
Ms.Alisha Benson
May 26,2020
Page 5
Approved as to form:
Assistant City Attorney
**********
Reviewed and agreed to this day of ,2020.
City of Spokane Valley
By:
Title:
Approved as to form:
Assistant City Attorney
**********
Reviewed and agreed to this day of ,2020.
Spokane Regional Health District
By:
Title:
**********
Reviewed and agreed to this day of ,2020.
Greater Spokane Incorporated
Mr.Wes Crago
Ms.Amelia Clark
Mr.Mark Calhoun
Ms.Alisha Benson
May 26,2020
Page 6
By:
Title:
COVID-19 Recovery Committee Meeting
Notes
5/26/20
MOU (attached)
— Requested by Board of County Commissioners (BoCC)for draft sent to all signing entities for
review and comment (directed to Jim Emacio at jemacio@spokanecounty.org). BoCC will finalize
for signature next Monday 06/01/20.
Key Indictors Discussion (attached)
No billing to entities will be associated with Key Indicators construct or monitoring. Funding allocations
will be separate to each entity awarded. Minor clarifications are noted in the attached document.
Funding Recommendations (attached)
Healthy Sheltering Responses
• Proceed with Option 2; if NO from FEMA proceed with Option 1.
• BoCC Motion to Approve seeking Reimbursement to submit application for FEMA for Health
Sheltering. Confirmed 05/26/20
Isolation Responses
— Proceed with Option 1
Other Items
Review of ongoing role of Joint Information Center(JIC) or deactivate with the rest of the EOC at the
end of May and move to a Joint Information System with SRHD (Kelly) as the coordinator of
messaging. Chandra will meet with JIC member for input. May continue to use FTC for Facebook
Live. GSI Conference room is also available for online messaging.
COVID-19 Recovery Committee Key Indicators - FINAL
Revised 05/26/20
**DEM will provide resource and platform for metric collection and display**
Indicator Area Monitor Entity Metric Provider Indicator Metric Notes
Public Health SRHD SRHD Health Officer Restrictions
SRHD SRHD Contact Tracing
SRHD SRHD Testing
SRHD SRHD Isolation/Quarantine
SRHD SRHD Fatality Management
SRHD SRHD Congregate Living
SRHD SRHD Epidemiological Surveillance
SRHD SRHD Public Health Messaging
SRHD SRHD COVID-19 Data/Metrics
SRHD SRHD REDi Healthcare Coalition
SRHD SRHD Infection Prevention
SRHD 2nd Harvest Food Continuity/Distribution SRHD will operate only as main contacat for metric provider
Community Minded
SRHD Childcare SRHD will operate only as main contacat for metric provider
Enterprises
SRHD ALTCEW SRHD will operate only as main contacat for metric provider
Seniors
GSI via Economic
Economic Impacts GSI Revenue Recovery
Recovery Task
GSI via Economic
Discuss better verbiage with GSI/Ecomonist resources.May
GSI Recovery Task Business Closures
Force just look at trends upwards/downwards.
GSI WA State Stage Best Practices for Business
guidelines operation/reopening
Tyler NW Analytics
Public Safety Law Enforcement Lead(Sonya Crime Trends(includes
Domestic Violence)
Aebischer SCSO)
Fire EMS Mike Lopez 911,Ambulance and ED
utilization rates
Behavioral Health BH-ASO Kathleen Torella Behavioral Health Capacity
Behavioral Health
BH-ASO Kathleen Torella
Mobile/Remote Connectivity
Mobile Crisis Hotline
BH-ASO Kathleen Torella
Utilization
Related to long-term provisioning for physical dsicataning
Continum of Care and isolation capcaity for each shelter Provider within
Housing Pam Tietz Healthy Sheltering Capacity
(CoC)Board) regular facility.Include City/County/Valley staff working with
shelter providers to ensure or assist.
Continum of Care Include supportive as well as general market housing
Pam Tietz Housing Capacity
(CoC)Board) availablity.
Meeting Notes in Pink
Recovery Committee Direction in Green
COVID- 19 RESPONSE COST & FUNDING UPDATE
MAY 26, 2020
OBJECTIVES
� . Understand Costs for Response Projects
2. Understand & Decide Funding Options
Healthy Sheltering
Isolation/Quarantine
Agree on Next Steps
REGIONAL RESPONSE COSTS - UPDATE
Cost Estimates
2020 Recurring 2021 Recurring Total Estimated Actual Cost as of
Projects Fiscal Agent One-time Costs Costs Costs Project Cost April 23
Emergency Operation Coordination County DEM 150,000 1,250,000 350,000 1,750,000 219,034
Public Health Preparedness Health District 1,581,000 395,250 1,976,250 -
PPE - local govt. Each Entity 1,920,000 2,500,000 4,420,000 -
Community Drive-through Screening/Testing Health District 69,750 - 69,750 47,193
Mobile/Telehealth "Triage" Unit Health District 90,000 120,000 210,000 9,013
Homeless Shelter - Social Distancing (100 beds) City of Spokane 99,825 3,018,429 4,024,572 7,142,826 46,495
Isolation/Quarantine Facility (100 people) City of Spokane 68,167 920,943 1,841,866 2,830,976 97,433
Alternative Care Facility (50 people) * County DEM 68,167 3,223,301 3,867,961 7,159,429 -
Security of Govt Facilities Each Entity 306,000 612,000 918,000 -
Public Safety Response Each Entity 1,500,000 1,875,000 3,375,000 -
386,159 13,879,423 15,586,649 29,852,231 419,168
* Does not include medical service/supply costs.
REGIONAL RESPONSE COSTS - UPDATE
Cost Estimates
2020 Recurring 2021 Recurring Total Estimated Actual Cost as of
Projects Fiscal Agent One-time Costs Costs Costs Project Cost April 23
Emergency Operation Coordination County DEM 150,000 1,250,000 350,000 1,750,000 219,034
Public Health Preparedness Health District 1,581,000 395,250 1,976,250 -
PPE - local govt. Each Entity 1,920,000 2,500,000 4,420,000 -
Community Drive-through Screening/Testing Health District 69,750 - 69,750 47,193
Mobile/Telehealth "Triage" Unit Health District 90,000 120,000 210,000 9,013
Homeless Shelter - Social Distancing (100 beds) City of Spokane 99,825 3,018,429 4,024,572 7,142,826 46,495
Isolation/Quarantine Facility (100 people) City of Spokane 68,167 920,943 1,841,866 2,830,976 97,433
Alternative Care Facility (50 people) * County DEM 68,167 3,223,301 3,867,961 7,159,429 -
Security of Govt Facilities Each Entity 306,000 612,000 918,000 -
Public Safety Response Each Entity 1,500,000 1,875,000 3,375,000 -
386,159 13,879,423 15,586,649 29,852,231 419,168
* Does not include medical service/supply costs.
HEALTHY SHELTERING (SPACE AND 24/7; - COST ESTIMATES
Response 1 - Library Facility (Mar-
May 15) Out of Pocket Cost $1,275,000
Operating Cost $175,000 Contributed Cost $69,750
Library Cost (25k sf @ $13.50) $42,188
Subtotal Response 1 $217,188 Total Sheltering Response Cost * $1,344,750
Response 2 - Arena & 8th St. Bldg. Cover all out of ocket
Aril —Aug(April 30)
Operating Cost $750,000 expenses.
Arena Cost $350,000
8th St. Bldg Cost (7k sf @ $13.50) $27,563 Contribution — Invoice-able
Subtotal Response 2 $1,127,563
costs that City/Countychose
Total Sheltering Response Cost $1,344,750
not to bill as In-kind
* Cost estimates through Aug. 2020 only
HEALTHY SHELTERING (SPACE AND 24/7) - FUNDING OPTIONS
Option 1 - DOC Grant ✓ DOC grant for homeless sheltering response &
DOC Grant (100% OOP only) $1,275,000 isolation of homeless.Awarded amount is $1 .4
Contribution (In-kind) $69,750 million.
$1,344,750 ✓ Use of FEMA requires authority. If granted, authority
good for 30-day increments. FEMA application
drafted and pending funding decision.
Option 2 - FEMA & Other
FEMA (75% limit, 79% of OOP) $1,008,563
Match - DOC $266,438 Recovery Committee Direction:
Match — Contribution (In-kind) $69,750 • Advance Option 2; if NO from FEMA
$1,344,750 proceed to Option 1.
• BoCC Motion to Approve seeking
Reimbursement to submit application
Option 3 - CARES Relief Funds (CRF) for FEMA for Health Sheltering.
CRF (100% OOP only) $1,275,000 Confirmed 05/26/20
Contribution (In-kind) $69,750
$1,344,750
COVID- I ISOLATION & QUARANTIN - COST ESTIMATES
Response 1 - Fairgrounds
Operating Cost $273,000 Out of Pocket Cost $459,000
Fairgrounds Cost Contribution (event
rates) (In-kind) $333,000 Contributed Cost $333,000
Subtotal Response 1 $606,000
Total Isolation/Quarantine Response
Response 2 - Other Facility Cost * $792,000
Operating Cost $71,000 Cover all out of pocket expenses.
Other Facility Cost $115,000 Contribution — invoice-able costs that
Subtotal Response 2 $186,000 City/County chose not to bill as In-kind
Total Isolation/Quarantine Response Cost * $792,000
* Cost estimates through Aug. 2020 only
COVID- 19 ISOLATION & QUARANTINE - FUNDING OPTIONS
Option 1 — FEMA ✓ FEMA authorization granted April 6.
FEMA (58% limit — 100% OOP) $459,000 Re-authorized for May 6-June 6.
Match (42% - contribution) (In-kind) $333,000 Next 30-day authorization pending
$792,000 funding decision.
Option 2 - DOC Grant
✓ DOC grant for homeless sheltering
DOC Grant (100% OOP only) $459,000 response & isolation of homeless.
Contribution (In-kind) $333,000
Awarded amount is $ 1 .4 million.
$792,000 Recovery committee Direction:
• Proceed with Option 1
Option 3 -CARES Relief Funds
CRF (100% OOP only) $459,000
Contribution in-kind) $333,000
$792,000
NEXT STEPS
I . Follow-up on sheltering and isolation tasks.
2. Review costs and funding options for public health projects.
I . Community screening
2. Tracing
3. Mobile triage
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: June 30, 2020 Department Director Approval:
Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ® new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Motion Consideration: Barker Road/BSNF Grade Separation Project—
Interlocal Agreement with WSDOT for Project Construction and Construction Administration
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: None
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN:
• May 7, 2013 —Administrative Report, Bridging the Valley
• June 23, 2015 — Passed Resolution No. 17-011 adopting the 2016-2021 Six Year
Transportation Improvement Program (TIP), which included both the Barker Road and
the Pines Road Grade Separation Projects (GSP)
• April 5, 2016 —Admin Report for use of federal earmark funds
• November 8, 2016 — Information Report on the status of the Barker GSP
• November 15, 2016 —Administrative Report on the Barker GSP status
• November 22, 2016 — Informational RCA
• December 6, 2016—Administrative Report
• December 20, 2016—Administrative Report
• January 10, 2017— Motion failed to contract with DEA for project design services
• February 21, 2017 —Administrative Report
• February 28, 2017 — Passed Resolution 17-006, amending the 2017 TIP
• May 23, 2017 — Passed Resolution No. 17-011 adopting the 2018-2023 Six-Year TIP, which
included the Grade Separation Project
• August 22, 2017— Passed motion to enter into contract with DEA for the project's Phase 1
• October 24, 2017—Administrative Report to discuss alternatives
• January 30, 2018 —Administrative Report to discuss alternatives with Council consensus to
move the project forward with Alternative 5
• March 2, 2018 —Administrative Report to discuss alternatives
• March 13, 2018—Administrative Report to discuss history and alternatives
• March 16, 2018—Administrative Report for Council and Chamber of Commerce
• March 27, 2018 — Passed motion to select preferred alternative for advancing project
• April 10, 2018— Passed motion to execute supplemental agreement with DEA for the
project's Phase 2 design
• December 4, 2018 —Administrative Report to discuss project status
• September 10, 2019 —Adoption of Ordinance 19-012 authorizing use of condemnation for
property acquisition with regards to three property owners;
• November 12, 2019 —Adoption of Ordinance 19-020 authorizing use of condemnation for
property acquisition with regards to a fourth property owner;
• January 14, 2020 — Passed motion to execute supplemental agreement with DEA;
• January 21, 2020 — Passed motion regarding property acquisition;
• March 31, 2020 — Passed motion to execute Avista Utility Construction Agreement; and
• May 12, 2020 — Passed motion to execute BSNF Overpass Agreement.
BACKGROUND: Over the past three years, the City has been working with David Evans &
Associates (Consultant) to develop and bring to fruition, the Barker Road/BNSF Railroad Grade
Separation Project. In the first phase of the project, which began in 2017, the Consultant
analyzed and compared six alternatives in terms of cost, right-of-way (ROW) needs, impacts to
existing properties, constructability, safety, and other pertinent project elements, so the City
could select the preferred alternative. In the second phase of the project, which began in 2018,
the Consultant developed final design and construction documents for the project.
As the project moves towards construction, the City and WSDOT have recognized the benefits
for WSDOT managing the construction and construction contract administration for the project.
The attached Interlocal Agreement outlines the mutually agreed upon conditions for
administration of the construction contract.
The following are significant items contained within the Agreement.
• The City is responsible for preparation of the Construction Documents, following
WSDOT guidelines
• WSDOT will Bid, Award, and Execute the Construction Contract
• WSDOT will award to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder, unless that bid
exceeds the Engineer's Estimate for construction by more than 10 percent, in which
case, bid award will require City approval
• WSDOT will be the lead agency in the administration of the Construction Contract
• Change Orders during construction in excess of$100,000, and when cumulative change
orders exceed $350,0000, will require City review and approval
• The City will be part of WSDOT's Final Inspection and Project Acceptance procedures
• The City will have the sole discretion to issue a Letter of Acceptance to WSDOT at the
final project closeout, until it is fully satisfied with the project
• The City will reimburse WSDOT for all costs associated with project construction and
construction administration.
OPTIONS: 1) Authorize the City Manager to execute the Interlocal Agreement GCB 3305
between WSDOT and the City; or 2) Take other appropriate action.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to authorize the City Manager to finalize and
execute the Barker Road/BNSF Grade Separation Interlocal Agreement GCB 3305 between
WSDOT and the City.
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: To date, the City has secured funding for the project from
seven sources in excess of $24,000,000. The Interlocal Agreement will be funded from the
project.
STAFF CONTACT: William Helbig, PE— Engineering Manager
ATTACHMENTS: Interlocal Agreement GCB 3305 with Exhibits
GCB 3305
Barker Road/BNSF Grade Separation (at Trent Avenue - SR 290)
HLP-REP-TIGER IX 4123(005)
This Interlocal Agreement is entered into between the City of Spokane Valley, hereinafter
referred to as the "Local Agency," and the Eastern Region of the Washington State Department
of Transportation, hereinafter referred to as "WSDOT," hereinafter to be referred to individually
as the "Party" and collectively as the "Parties."
A. The Local Agency is planning the reconstruction of a portion of SR 290, a non-limited
access controlled facility, located within the boundaries of the Local Agency, by
constructing a roundabout at the intersection of SR 290 and Barker Rd. which will be
connected to a new railroad overcrossing at Barker Rd. hereafter called the "Project." A
vicinity map is incorporated into this Agreement as Exhibit A.
B. The Local Agency is fully obligated for the cost of all design work, property acquisition,
construction, and Contract administration described herein and has secured sufficient
funding for the design, right of way acquisition, and construction of the Project, as set
forth in D. below.
C. WSDOT has agreed to perform Contract administration on the project.
D. The Local Agency has committed $20,533,391 funds to cover all Project Construction
costs (Project Construction Budget) and WSDOT will not contribute any money toward
the Project.
E. WSDOT recognizes the benefits to the transportation system and the Local Agency from
the construction of the Project.
F. WSDOT and the Local Agency now wish to define each Party's responsibilities for
Contract administration of the Project.
Now, therefore, by virtue of Title 39.34 RCW, pursuant to the above recitals that are
incorporated herein as if fully set forth below and in consideration of the terms, conditions,
covenants and performances contained in or the attached Exhibits A, B, and C by this reference
made a part of this Agreement,
It is mutually agreed as follows:
1. Pre-Construction and Construction Provisions:
1.1 The Local Agency shall prepare the Project documents comprised of Intersection Plans,
Bid Proposal, Contract Plans, Specifications, and Estimate (PS&E). The Intersection
Plans were developed and approved in accordance with all applicable sections of the
WSDOT Design Manual and are incorporated into this Agreement as Exhibit B. The
GCB 3305 Page 1 of 10
PS&E shall be prepared in accordance with the current WSDOT Plans Preparation
Manual and the Electronic Engineering Data Standards Manuals. WSDOT shall review
and concur the PS&E meets the requirements as described. Notice of PS&E concurrence
will be provided to the Local Agency by the WSDOT Representative identified in
Section 3 below, via email or formal letter. A copy of the PS&E sealed by the Local
Agency's Consultant Engineer of Record (EOR)will be kept on file in the WSDOT
Representative's office.
1.2 In coordination with the WSDOT Plans Office, the Local Agency will follow the State
Ad and Award process as outlined in the current version of the State Ad and Award
Manual and Local Agency Guidelines Manual; Chapter 45.
1.3 The Local Agency shall, at its sole expense, obtain all permits and agreements with
BNSF Railroad required to advertise the project and assist WSDOT in obtaining any
permits or agreement with the BNSF Railroad required during the duration of the Project.
1.4 Prior to Execution of the Project's Contract, the Local Agency's Consultant shall provide
to the WSDOT Representative all Construction Surveying information necessary for the
construction of the project, such as primary survey control data, final surfaces to be used
for Global Positioning System (GPS) surveying, slope stake notes, etc.
2. Bid,Award, and Execution
2.1 The Local Agency shall be responsible for all costs associated with advertising for bids,
award and execution of the Project's Contract.
2.2 WSDOT will advertise the Project for construction bids in accordance with the WSDOT
State Advertisement and Award Manual procedures and Local Agency Guidelines
Manual; Chapter 45.
2.3 WSDOT will award and execute the Project Contract, with the concurrence of the Local
Agency, as set forth below. The Project Contract will be between WSDOT and the
Contractor.
2.4 The Local Agency and their Consultant EOR shall assist WSDOT in answering bid
questions and resolving any design issues that may arise. All comments and clarifications
from bidders must go through WSDOT.
2.5 Upon bid opening, WSDOT shall submit a list of bid tabulations and bid results to the
Local Agency prior to award of the Project. WSDOT will award to the lowest responsive
and responsible bidder, unless that bid exceeds the Engineer's Estimate for construction
by more than 10%.
2.6 In the event bids exceed the Engineer's Estimate for construction by more than 10%,
WSDOT shall request written concurrence for Contract award or rejection from the Local
Agency prior to Contract award. The Local Agency shall provide written concurrence for
Contract award within five (5)working days of receipt of WSDOT's written request for
concurrence. If the Local Agency does not notify WSDOT within five (5) working days,
GCB 3305 Page 2 of 10
or as mutually extended in writing, WSDOT will reject all bids. The Local Agency shall
be responsible for all costs associated with rejection of bids.
2.7 If the Project is to be re-advertised, this Agreement will remain in affect between the
Local Agency and WSDOT. All additional costs for re-advertisement of the Project will
be at the Local Agency's expense.
3. Party Representatives
3.1 WSDOT shall be responsible for the day-to-day Contract administration of the Project in
accordance with the terms of Section 1, and has designated a representative to administer
the Project.
3.2 The WSDOT Representative shown in Section 3.3 shall be WSDOT's Representative
throughout Project construction, to ensure that the Project is constructed according to the
accepted Contract documents, associated permits, and in accordance with the terms of
this Agreement.
3.3 The representatives for WSDOT and the Local Agency are identified as follows:
WSDOT Representative Local Agency Representative
Mark Allen P.E. Robert Lochmiller, PEI Senior Engineer
2714 N. Mayfair St. 10210 E. Sprague Avenue Spokane
Spokane, WA 99207 Valley, WA 99206
Telephone Number: office (509) 324- Telephone Number: (509) 720-5010
6232 or cell (509) 209-7552 Email: rlochmiller@spokanevalley.org
Email: AllenMV@wsdot.wa.gov
3.4 Each Party's representative listed in Section 3.3 shall be responsible for familiarizing
themselves with the Contract documents, schedule, and relevant issues affecting the
faithful construction of the Project. Both representatives shall coordinate and cooperate
with one another in good faith to ensure completion of the Project in accordance with the
Contract documents. Each Party's representative shall provide to the other Party a list of
personnel who will be assigned to the Project to be presented at a construction kick-off
meeting. The Local Agency's list shall also identify any Consultant personnel the Local
Agency may utilize for the Project work. The construction kick-off meeting will be
arranged by the WSDOT Representative's Office within fifteen (15) days after Contract
Award. The Parties will update the lists as needed during the course of the Project and
provide such updates to the other Party.
3.5 The Local Agency recognizes the WSDOT Representative's role as lead for the Project.
All communication relative to Project from the Local Agency will be through WSDOT's
Representative, or as designated by the Representative. Further, all communication
between WSDOT and the Local Agency will be through the Local Agency's
Representative, or as designated by the Representative as provided in Section 3.3.
GCB 3305 Page 3 of 10
4. Construction
4.1 WSDOT will be the Local Agency's Representative during construction and will act as
lead agency in the administration of the Contract. A description of the work to be
accomplished on the Project is attached and is incorporated into this Agreement as
Exhibit C. The WSDOT Representative will provide all necessary services and tools,
including but not limited to Contract administration, inspection, materials testing, and the
representation necessary to administer and manage the construction Contract for the
Project to ensure work is constructed in accordance with the Contract documents.
WSDOT may utilize a Consultant in providing some of these services.
4.2 WSDOT will allow the Local Agency to consult with and inquire of the WSDOT
Representative, attend all meetings, and have access to all documentation as to all matters
concerning the Project. The Local Agency shall not provide direction, directly or
indirectly to the contractor. All contact between said Local Agency and the Contractor
shall be through WSDOT's Representative.
4.3 The Local Agency may inspect the Project. Any costs for such inspection shall be borne
solely by the Local Agency.
4.4 WSDOT will maintain one set of plans as the official "as-built" set, then make notations in
red ink of all plan revisions typically recorded per standard WSDOT practices,in
accordance with the Construction Manual. Once final acceptance of the Contract has
occurred, WSDOT will submit one reproducible set of as-built plans to the Local Agency no
later than 180 days after Final Acceptance.
4.5 WSDOT will prepare the permanent final construction documentation in general
conformance with Section 10-3.1A(1) of the WSDOT Construction Manual.
4.6 The Local Agency shall provide at their sole expense a Bridge Technical Advisor(BTA)
who serves as the structural subject matter expert to advise the WSDOT Representative
and provide professional certification for structural modifications including but not
limited to"as-built" changes, change orders, shop drawing concurrence, etc.
5. Archeological and/or Historical Findings
5.1 If any archaeological and/or historical resources are revealed in the Project work vicinity,
work shall immediately stop work. WSDOT will retain a qualified archaeologist, at the
Local Agency's sole cost and expense, who shall evaluate the site. The WSDOT
Representative, in consultation with applicable WSDOT personnel, shall be solely
responsible for determining when and under what circumstances the Project work may
continue. The Local Agency agrees that costs incurred as a result of a suspension of the
Project work pursuant to this provision shall be part of the Project costs and shall be the
sole responsibility of the Local Agency. WSDOT shall have no cost liability as provided
in Section 6.1.
6. Payment
GCB 3305 Page 4 of 10
6.1 The Local Agency agrees that it shall be responsible for the Construction Engineering
costs to cover all actual direct and related indirect costs associated with Contract
administration. As per the WSDOT EBASE User's Guide, the cost of this work is
estimated to be 10% of the Engineer's Estimate or the Bid Proposal amount, whichever is
higher. WSDOT shall invoice the Local Agency and provide supporting documentation,
for which the Local Agency agrees to pay WSDOT within thirty (30) calendar days of
receipt and approval of an invoice. A partial payment will not constitute agreement as to
the appropriateness of any item and that, at the time of final invoice, the Parties will
resolve any discrepancies. Advertisement, bid analysis and award costs are included in
Local Agency Agreement Number 09095.
6.2 Increase in Cost: In the event unforeseen conditions require an increase in the cost of the
work listed above in Section 6.1, (including sales tax, engineering, contingencies, and
WSDOT overhead) by more than Twenty Five (25)percent, the Parties agree to modify
the amount listed in Section 6.1 to include such cost increase. Local Agency shall be
responsible for any such cost increases.
6.3 Contract administration costs shall commence on the day of Award.
6.4 The cost of the construction includes items set forth in the Contract documents.
Construction contingencies may be used for cost increases to the Project Contract work,
including any change orders. Construction engineering as shown in Section 6.1
reimburses the WSDOT Contract administration work.
6.5 The WSDOT Representative (or designee)will hold progress estimate review meetings
with the contractor as needed, and will invite the Local Agency to participate in these
reviews when they occur. WSDOT will be responsible for making progress payments
and final payment to the contractor in accordance with the 2020 WSDOT Standard
Specifications. WSDOT shall invoice the Local Agency and provide supporting
documentation, for which the Local Agency agrees to reimburse WSDOT within thirty
(30) calendar days of receipt.
7. Right of Entry
7.1 The Local Agency hereby grants to WSDOT and its authorized agents, contractors,
subcontractors, and employees, a right of entry upon all land in which the Local Agency
has an interest for the purpose of constructing the Project.
8. Change Orders
8.1 Changes to the Project Contract will be documented by change order in accordance with
the 2020 WSDOT Standard Specifications. WSDOT shall process change orders for all
the changes affecting the Project in accordance with Section 1-04.4 of the 2020 WSDOT
Standard Specifications.
8.2 WSDOT will advise the Local Agency of any proposed required changes affecting the
Project as soon as possible and provide an opportunity, if time permits, to review the
change before implementation. WSDOT will determine the length of the review time
GCB 3305 Page 5 of 10
based upon the need to expedite the change to avoid delay to the Contractor.
8.3 WSDOT shall submit proposed change orders in excess of$100,000 to the Local Agency
for review and approval prior to the issuance of a change order to the Contractor.
WSDOT has the right to issue change orders necessary to, in its sole discretion, preserve
public safety without first obtaining Local Agency approval. In such circumstances,
Local Agency agrees that WSDOT may issue change orders of$100,000 or less without
the Local Agency's approval when aggregated they are less than 15 percent of the total
Contract amount or $350,000 whichever is less. If cumulative change orders are
anticipated to exceed that amount, WSDOT shall timely notify the Local Agency so staff
may seek additional change order authority from City Council so that the Project is not
delayed. The Local Agency further agrees to reimburse WSDOT for all change orders as
provided in this agreement. Time and monetary impacts to the Contract that occur while
waiting for Local Agency change order approval will be borne by the Local Agency.
8.4 The Local Agency's Consultant EOR shall be responsible for providing revised plan
sheets, specifications, quantities, updated design information, and staking information, as
necessary for change orders. WSDOT will make available to the Local Agency all
change order documentation related to the Project.
9. Final Inspection and Project Acceptance
9.1 Punch List: WSDOT shall notify the Local Agency in writing of Substantial Completion,
as defined in the 2020 WSDOT Standard Specifications, of the Project, within five (5)
working days of said completion. WSDOT shall prepare the punch list and oversee the
Contractor's corrections for the entire project. WSDOT shall include the Local Agency
in a walk-through to assist WSDOT in compiling punch list items that are outside
WSDOT's SR 290 limits.
9.2 Project Acceptance: After Physical Completion, as defined in the 2020 WSDOT Standard
Specification, the Local Agency will provide WSDOT with a Letter of Acceptance of the
Project, after the following items have been completed:
a. Satisfactory completion of the Project Work as determined by WSDOT and all the
WSDOT's Agreement obligations;
b. Final inspection of the Project work;
c. Submittal by WSDOT to the Local Agency of a complete set of as-built plans
acceptable to the Local Agency and final record documentation for the Project; and
d. Submittal of the final Project Record of Materials (ROM) and all supporting materials
documentation by WSDOT.
The Local Agency's Letter of Acceptance shall include a release of WSDOT from all
past, present and future claims and/or demands of any nature resulting from the
performance of the Project work, except for claims resulting from negligent construction
GCB 3305 Page 6 of 10
defects of a latent nature located within the Project limits or SR 290 right of way, and
subject to WSDOT's obligations.
9.2.1 The Local Agency may withhold its Project acceptance by submitting written
notification, including the reason(s)for withholding acceptance, to WSDOT,
within thirty (30) calendar days following the date the final inspection was
performed. The Parties shall work together in good faith to resolve the
outstanding issues identified in the Local Agency's written notification. If any
issues cannot be resolved within forty-five (45) calendar days after the Local
Agency's notification, the Parties agree to meet and discuss a resolution of the
outstanding issue(s)within the forty-five (45) calendar day time frame, including
providing for an extension of time in which to resolve all matters.
9.2.2 Upon final resolution of the outstanding issues, the Local Agency agrees to
deliver a Letter of Acceptance to WSDOT.
9.2.3 The Local Agency shall continue to be responsible for all actual direct and related
indirect costs incurred by WSDOT, until the outstanding issue(s) have been
resolved, a Letter of Acceptance has been issued, and all payments have been
made pursuant to Section 6.
10. Indemnification and Hold Harmless
10.1 Each Party to this Agreement will protect, defend, indemnify, and save harmless the other
Party, its officers, officials, employees, and agents, while acting within the scope of their
employment as such, from any and all costs, claims,judgments, and/or awards of
damages (both to persons and property), arising out of, or in any way resulting from, each
Party's negligent acts or omissions with respect to the provisions of this Agreement.
Neither Party will be required to indemnify, defend, or save harmless the other Party if
the claim, suit, or action for injuries, death, or damages (both to persons and property)is
caused by the sole negligence of the other Party. Where such claims, suits, or actions
result from the concurrent negligence of the Parties, their agents, officials or employees,
and/or involve those actions covered by RCW 4.24.115, the indemnity provisions
provided herein will be valid and enforceable only to the extent of the negligence of the
indemnifying Party, its agents, officials or employees.
10.2 The Parties agree that their obligations under this section extend to any claim, demand,
and/or cause of action brought by, or on behalf of, any of their officers, officials,
employees or agents. For this purpose only, the Parties, by mutual negotiation, hereby
waive, with respect to each other only, any immunity that would otherwise be available
against such claims under the Industrial Insurance provisions of Title 51 RCW.
10.3 This indemnification and waiver shall survive the termination of this Agreement.
GCB 3305 Page 7of10
11. Records and Audit
11.1 During construction of the Project through Project Acceptance, WSDOT will maintain all
records and accounts pertaining to the construction and Contract administration of the
Project. After closeout, and for a period of not less than six (6)years from the date of
final payment to the Contractor, the records and accounts pertaining to the construction
and Contract administration of the WSDOT operated and maintained portions of the
Project, shall be maintained and kept available by WSDOT for inspection and audit by
the Local Agency and federal government and for use in the event of litigation, claim or
any other purpose. All records generated or used in this Project shall be subject to the
Public Record Act, chapter 42.56 RCW. The Local Agency is responsible for retention of
records provided after closeout for Local Agency constructed facilities in accordance
with the appropriate retention policies. In the event of litigation or claim arising from the
performance of this Agreement, WSDOT agrees to maintain the records and accounts
until all such litigation, appeal or claim are finally resolved. This Section shall survive
termination of this Agreement.
12. Claims
12.1 Claims for Additional Payment
12.1.1 In the event the Contractor makes a claim for additional payment, WSDOT will
notify the Local Agency immediately of such claims. Such claims shall be made
in the manner and form as provided for in the 2020 WSDOT Standard
Specifications.
12.1.2 The Local Agency shall have the right to review and discuss the settlement of all
claims presented by the Contractor. The ultimate decision to pay a claim will be
by mutual agreement of the Local Agency and WSDOT. In the event such claims
are not resolved, the Local Agency shall defend itself and WSDOT against such
claims at its sole cost and shall pay any settlement, court judgment or arbitration
award resulting from such claims, provided that the Local Agency shall not be
obligated to pay such claims or the cost of defense to the extent that the claims are
caused solely by the negligent acts or omissions of WSDOT in administrating the
contract. WSDOT will cooperate with the Local Agency in the Local Agency's
defense of the claim. The Local Agency shall reimburse any WSDOT costs
incurred in providing such assistance.
13. Amendments
13.1 This Agreement, including the attached Exhibits, may be amended or modified only by
the mutual agreement of the Parties. Such amendments or modifications shall not be
binding unless they are in writing and signed by persons authorized to bind each of the
Parties.
14. Termination
14.1 The Secretary of the Department of Transportation, or designee, may terminate this
Agreement if the funding becomes unavailable or otherwise determined to be in the best
interest of WSDOT.
GCB 3305 Page 8 of 10
14.2 The Local Agency, may terminate this Agreement if the funding becomes unavailable or
otherwise determined to be in the best interest of the Local Agency.
14.3 If either Party terminates this Agreement pursuant to Section 14, the terminating Agency
shall give the other Party at least 90 days advance written notice.
15. Dispute Resolution
15.1 The Parties agree that any and all disputes or claims arising out of or relating to this
Agreement shall be submitted to a mediator selected by both Parties for mediation
pursuant to Section 15.2 below.
15.2 Mediation. Either Party may commence mediation by providing the other Party with a
written request for mediation, setting forth the matter in dispute and the relief requested.
The Parties agree to cooperate with one another in selecting a mediator and scheduling
mediation proceedings. The Parties agree to participate in the mediation in good faith.
The Local Agency agrees, at its sole cost and expense, to pay all costs of the mediation
between the Parties. WSDOT shall have no cost liability as provided in Section 6.1. If the
Parties do not agree on a mediation service to conduct the mediation, the mediation shall
be conducted in accordance with the Construction Industry Mediation Rules of the
American Arbitration Association. All offers, promises, conduct and statements, whether
written or oral, made in the course of mediation are confidential, privileged, and/or
inadmissible for any purpose in any litigation or arbitration of the dispute, provided that
evidence that is otherwise admissible or discoverable shall not be rendered inadmissible
or non-discoverable as a result of its use in mediation
15.3 Venue: In the event that either Party deems it necessary to institute legal action or
proceedings to enforce any right or obligation under this Agreement, the Parties agree
that any such action or proceedings shall be brought in the superior court situated in
Thurston County, Washington unless filing in another county is required under any
provision of the Revised Code of Washington. Further, the Parties agree that each shall
be responsible for its own attorneys' fees and costs.
16. Term of Agreement
16.1 Unless otherwise provided herein, the term of this Agreement shall commence and shall
be binding on the Parties as of the date this Agreement is fully executed and shall
continue until the Project is accepted by the Local Agency pursuant to Section 9, all
payments are made as required under Section 6.
GCB 3305 Page 9 of 10
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the Party's
date signed last below.
City of Spokane Valley Washington State
Department of Transportation
By: By:
Printed: Mark Calhoun Printed: Mike Gribner, P.E.
Title: City Manager Title: Regional Administrator
Date: Date:
Approved as to Form Approved as to Form
City of Spokane Valley Washington State
Department of Transportation
By: By:
Printed: Cary Driskell Printed:
Title: City Attorney Title: Assistant Attorney General
Date: Date:
GCB 3305 Page 10 of 10
TWO LANE ROUNDABOUT � �
WELLESLEY AVE
BARKER OVERPASS
290110 p,�lEl
s
SPOKANE VALLEY
X CITY LIMITS
ill 0 CLOSE FLORA RD AT A
D GRADE CROSSING x
73 0 0
VICINITY MAP
BARKER ROAD/BNSF GRADE SEPARATION
rrt--i —
-- --viELl€BEY NEII£eL€'r
Lodg1 -YFEN3" -
IJF • .,
(+p
uu.
9i „` g
t . AR€ - ,to, dVTG� _ ' 0,v, P
� ONBIANA
a 0 NM
ll''�m ----�_. �� -pd BRO-� AY 'rt-• �'.eROAbt'iAv : „,
GCCL�pSLF'g VAL i -&..-AL�� ■■-ALLFYbiAV ...FYIFY I �l�t� Sö1 ' "tio P��U' j 1ane
L _ 3 wpm- • ,e,N� — 1
ts,�- � _ � - Valley.
`' E �`' - _s� SPOKANE VALLEY CITY LIMITS
f li
,‘,..____/— PROJECT LIMITS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
I PROJECT 0143
r r `' DRAWN BY: DATE:
4RAL 4/8/20
CHECKED BY: DATE:
RAL 4/8/20
- __,_ _ .,
_ __ _
__
i
SEC 5 & 6
BARKER/TRENT EXISTING BARKER/TRENT 2040 1.25 N . R.4 5 E■ VV. M .
AM(PM) PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUME AM(PM)PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUME CURB 3 SEE STD
14500 EB ADT(2040) 10500 UB ADT(2040) Q PLAN F-10.18-01
1,023(512) 1,055(550) CDIUS110(55) SWAOFS 4 O F SEC 3 TR D19+442.63 (49.22' LT)
SE 31 /&
21500 EXISTING ADT 15100 EXISTING ADT _
387(1,021) 425(1,055) o �� END RADIUS
TRENT 6s(34) TRENT
395(385) �V 80°05'26" 86 4619
T.26N . RV. TR 109+54.65 (74.5' LT)
96(142) '-'"---a..-.10---"" BEGIN RADIUS
BEGIN RADIUS TR 109+67.86 (37.21' LT)
R 108+86.81 (75.9' LT) END RADIUS
BEGIN RADIUS D TR 109+70.49 (34.70 LT)
73
a pc 4 TR 108+75.50 (32.5' LT) _
110+00.00 P.O.B. -
Y y eel M YEt 4� 108+24.18 P.T. + TRENT 109+98.9fi, 42.19' LT
OC a Co
m m
N CURB 2 SEE STD 6 110+14.23 P.C.
PLAN F-10.18-01 N
D
BEGIN SIDEWALK BEGIN RADIUS
TR 107+76.27 (39.6' LT) 11 EB 210+60.20 (85.3 LT)
LEGEND
` ALIGNMENT ` /zz BEGIN CURB �
CONCURRENCE DATE / �7 TR 107+77.76 (31.8' L
iir
- RIGHT OF WAY BOUNDARY EASTERN REGION TRAFFIC NGINEER 8'
0 6..
APPROVED_ DATE d i Z°/' 107+57.65 P.C. ,� ilW i,i �`` CURB 1 SEE STD_
EASTERN R I SSI NT REGION
PLAN -10.18-01
ADMINISTRATOR FOR DEVELOPMENT
Pir*
\� CENTERLINE��� WB TRENT AVE.
GI/SDOT APPROVAL /S ONLY FOR THE GEO/19ETR/C E 1N RADIUS /'1tP\ ( 000o! P4 _
DESIGN T /N T RIGHT END RADIUS BEGIN
tu
32.5' L
T E T G L/N ( -� �1/ �"� O
SHOGI/N FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLARE r4. Llry��6' Amigui Olr
~ - _ 106+17.73 P.T. - 41"((.002!OO"(____
16' CURVE 3 Q� ��+ �1-
cotsfe 2
_ y4 `rte-- _I� ii,
rr .� �T v" T
.-------1,91111 ‘
P.O.B ~_- 2illik
W1 i _footIsuau 2
BEGIN RADIUS `-��' `""--- ___ �•'1� -�°° az o4ilw18 A 12' R 15' �� O ��45�. 5 co
!A-3---1-2- „---------
99+59.47
_______,,
SR 290 M.P. 12.35 ---- _ �a _ -�
TR 101+59.47 (31.9' LT) - _ vii,liwi,.......
_ a / 4� 12' �` N
/ 00
101 +59:47 P.C. ~ _ - '7 ��
-
N
36r.E
TR B T ENT AVE
...... 1-----------------------------------
---------__----Y --'- .lp 111
I
_ NE
TRENT qyE S CURVE 1 �_ / 1r `� �'� � hRA- +
f R 290 _ ____- /IA\;,, p ^ry :::1--
10 10.00 P.O.E.
T)
____
__-- _�_-_--_----�_----------------� -- EB 210+54.72 41 R
-_-- 1
-` - ----___ CURB 2 SEE STD
a-lose• PLAN F-10.1$-01 fI �� END/BEGIN RADIUS
BEGIN RADIUS _ w BA 95+02.18 (79.3' RT)
TR 101+59.47 (32.1' RT) BEGIN RADIUS BEGIN RADIUS ;, ,,,'
TR 104+49.22 (44.0' RT) TR 107+24.15 (34.1' RT) END RADIUS ' `....
210+00.00 P.O.B. =
END RADIUS
at �/ TRENT 109+79,83, 50.55 RT
END RADIUS TR 107+21.43 (42.9' RT) TR 108+24.08 (48.6 RT)
TR 102+93.40 (32.0' RT) BEGIN RADIUS aEND RADIUSCENTERLINE TRENT AVE ' yBEGIN SIDEWALK TR 108+37.45 (54.9' RT) If TR 109+39.02 (50.77 RT)
TR 107+25.87 (41.9' RT)
_ END/BEGIN RADIUS fir` -- __ TR 108+65.09 32.8' R BEGIN RADIUS
-- -- _ -----
- y END RADIUS �ti �^h BA 94+58.17 (61.0' RT)
-- _ TR 108+68.13 (36.2' RT) ,, ,(/! CURB 2 SEE STD
47
CURVE DATA ,,_B 91LN9 RADIUS
L - ----- ~-- -4'r CENir_E_R_LINE BAR ER RDPLAN 10.18-01
CURVE P.I. STATION _ DELTA RADIUS TANGENT LENGTH ALIGNMENT SR 290/TRENT BARKER RD.I .�___r- o f __ ,~ ~~�
1 TR 103+92.50 25°0021" LT 1050' 232.84' 458.26' ROADWAY CLASSIFICATION PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL MINOR ARTERIAL BEGIN RADIUS /:;-
�/ END RADIUS ` -~'^ ``� - -----
2 TR 107+91.11 15°14'46" RT 250' v 33.46' 66.52' ACCESS CONTROL 2 (NON LIMITED) NIA TR 108+95.98 (49.3' RT) �� BA 93+64.26 (18.4' RT) '� ~- `-�
3 WB 110+76.66 58°16'27" LT 112' _ 62.43' 113.91'
END/BEGIN RADIUS
4 WB 112+30.70 15°16'33" RT 512' 68.66' 136.51' LAND USE RURAL RURAL BA 94+86.64 (35.5' LT) ' BEGIN RADIUS
5 WB 114+08.40 10°21'27" RT 1212' 109.85' 219.09' ADT (EXISTING) 21500 5500 -
BA 93+47.85 (16.0' RT)
6 WB 120+21.64 8°37'53" RT 1146' 86.48' 172.64' _ ADT (2040) 25000 6900 94+58.21 P.T. / 93+47.62 P.C.
7 EB 215+08.76 21°57'20" RT 1255' 243.44' 480.91' PERCENT TRUCKS (PEAK) 3% 3%
END/BEGIN RADIUS �q 7w4 / END CURB TRANSITION
8 EB 219+00,94 23°52'04" RT 732' 154.71' 304.93 * - BA 94+21.06 (21.0 LT) 59 .•••/94/ it ` BA 93 25.81 (16.0 RT)
9 EB 224+78.10 28°28'46" LT 708' 179.67' 351.92' DESIGN VEHICLE WB-50 WB 50 ENDIBEGfN RADIUS ' B,q L.. SiBEGIN CURB TRANSITION
DESIGN SPEED (MPH) 45 35 BA 93+79.14 (17.5` LT) OR Ri, 164 BA 93+20.81 (16.0 RT)
14 BA 94+03.27 15°50'26" LT 400' 55.65' 110.59' END/BEGIN RADIUS �'F/� R s/ •y 9?,�S BEGIN CURB
15 WE 120+91.56 9°59'57" RT 1146' 100.25' 200.00' POSTED SPEED (EXISTING) 50 45 BA 93+39.42 16.0' L �F ��]' D BA 93+18.48 (16.0' RT) 1 1
*ACCOMMODATE WB-67 ( �CF s 0 40 80
BEGIN RADIUS SCALE IN FEET
BA 93+18.48 (16.0' LT)
FILE NAME c:lpwworkingldealdms006031XL0'143-„PSjPA_-001.dgn Plot 1
TIME 8:44:38 AM RELEASE FOR CONSTRUCTION RECORD REGION STATE FED.AID PROJ.NO. � PLAN REF NO
Allft
SR290IBARKER ROAD
DATE 1/18/2019 NO.
PLOTTED BY DPOSTEN - 10 WASH e , \, ax Oa
IPA1
BNS GRADE SEPARATION
DESIGNED BY MSKINNERIBKIRKMAN JOB NUMBER b 4 x
ENTERED BY KMELBY '26 41397�� isT 4w���ww Washington State SPOKANE COUNTY - MP 12.5 SHEET,
CHECKED BY RPARGAS CONTRACT NO. LOCATION NO. `'S'IpNALSN4` Department of Transportation of
PROJ. ENGR. RPARGASISMARSHALL XL0143 - ' DLTE DATE INTERSECTION PLAN FOR APPROVAL SHEETS
REGIONAL ADM. DESCRIPTION DATE NO. P.E.STAMP BOX P.E.STAMP BOX 8
_.............. ___Ammi__
_____
_ __ _
___
SWI4OF SW1AOF SEC 32
T.26N . R.45E . W. M.
/EQUATION/
SR 290 MP 12.75 (AHEAD) =
SR 290 MP 12.76 (BACK)
END RADIUS
WB 119+75.00 (20.0' LT) �a
END RADIUS IV
WB 119+75.00 (4.0' RT) +
BEGIN RADIUS -A
END RADIUS WB 119+35.15 (20.0' LT) o
BEGIN RADIUS --.1. W
W
EB 211+63.82 (5'1.3' LT)
B 117+42.18 (4.0' RT) 119+35.15 P.C. 8 y
END RADIUS BEGIN RADIUS/TAPER + .13
BEGIN SIDEWALK BEGIN RADIUS CO
WB 11 +17.55 (20.091T) WB 117+24.08 (25.89 LT) �, P
EB 211+72.12 (61.1' LT) 17+�8.81 P.C. WB 119+35.'15 (4.0' RT) W
END/BEGIN RADIUS
in
BEGIN CURB WB 112+98.55 (20.0' LT) 115+17.65 P.T. CENTERLINE o
EB 211+73.64 (53.2' LT) _ WB TRENT AVE
,17
END RADIUS ___ _Y------ - - -- -- ----- -- -- ___ - - __ - p_____
WB 111+62.04 (20.0' LT) _'��`` WB TRENT AVE SR 290 _ 120
--------------
111 +28.14 P.T.
1 '11+62,04 P.C. WB LINE1111
N 66°21'30" f
_, -` BEGIN RADIUS `
__-- CURVE 5 -
�� WE 119+89.03 (20.0' LT) END
INE
......_...
a -- -- R-1ur ~ WE 120+'10.00 20.0' L
J
1
it
ry
i ��� GVH CURVE 7 E i
f °38 pp CENTERLINE
rt °:3. _ R�7235• EB TRENT-`��„ �r �_ �E WELLESLEY AVE co
-> ------- --- -- -- IT , AVE *
Zgp) ,2• mCuRve 15
��901 ---' 217+46.23 P.C.C. cu�y� •a
° 0,59"'E 1 NVQ tS ``-�____ CENTERLINE 8 �` li/,t~:L� .�
N s 14 5A 4 WREN `,,_-__"-- EB TRENT AVE ' • 'FSLEyq VE
- END BEGIN RADIUS
Ili + `-___ - - 212+6532 P.C. EB 217+46.23 (20.0 RT) Q
R�IoOo � r -
_ - BEGIN RADIUS _�_�-- _
---'" EB 212+52.81 (20.1' RT) _
END
END CURB - WE 120+10.00 (20.0' RT)
EB 211+74.31 (12.9' R1 BEGIN_ RADIUS/TAPER t5' 9 41
J'� END TAPER
_ EIdD SIDEWALK -`___ - WE 119+'10,47 (27.'!9' RT) '�8••
+ �. A.
p WE 120+06.13 (20.0 RT)
EB 21'f 74.39 (20.9' RT) ___ END/BEGIN RADIUS/TAPER
��� BEGIN RADIUS
_ EB 219+37.03 (8.0' LT) �(j�cV WE 119+59.25 (20.9' RT)
t"
- END/BEGIN RADIUS/TAPER �Q" Gj
EB 220+26.81 (4.0' LT) CO i
` END RADIUS CO
`_- EB 220+51.16 (4.0' LT) 220+51 ,16 P.T.
END RADIUS
EB 220+5.1.16 (20.0' RT)
CURVE DATA
CURVE P.I. STATION DELTA RADIUS TANGENT LENGTH
1 TR 103+92.50 25°00'21" LT _ 1050' 232.84" _ 458.26'
2 T• R 107+91.11 15°14'46" RT 250' 33.46' _ 66.52'
3 WB 110+76.66 58°16'27" LT _ 112' 62.43' _ 113.91'
CONCURRENCE - Z--)= -.. SATE //7/1
4 r W• B 112+30.70 15°16'33" RT 512' 68.66' 136.51' EASTERN REGIO TRAFFIC 'r GINEER
5 WB 114+08.40 10°21'27" RT 1212' _ 109.85' 219.09'
6 WB 120+21.64 8°37'53" RT 1146' _ 86.48' _ 172.64' APPROVED /i / % .�I 4° DATE 6 l'2-‘2 i1
7 r E• B 215+08.76 21°57'20" RT 1255' 243.44' + '480.91' EASTERNGIO ASS :TANT REGION
8 EB 219+00.94 23°52'04" RT 732' _ 154.71' 304.93' LEGEND ADMINISTRATO- FOR DEVELOPMENT
9 EB 224+78.10 _ 28°28'46" LT 708' _ 179.67' 351.92' . ALIGNMENT
14 BA 94+03.27 15°50'26" LT _ 400' 55.65' 110.59' PI/SPOT APPi40!/,4L /S ONLY FOR THE GEOMETRICRIGHT OF WAY BOUNDARY DESIGN 619THIN THE HIGHWAY RIGHTS OF 1414Y
15 WE 120+91.56 - 9°59'57" RT 1146' r 100.25' 200.00' _ • INCLUDING THOSE ACCESS CONTROLLED AREAS
RETAINED BY WSDOT RIGHT OF WAY LINES ARE
SHOWN FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. E 1 1
0 40 80
SCALE IN FEET
FILE NAME c:pwworkingldealdms006031XL0143_PS_!PA_002.dgn i
TIME �_ 8:46:38 AM RELEASE FOR CONSTRUCTION RECORD T REGION STAB FED.AID PROJ.NO. �. ' � Plot 1
DATE 1/11/2019 o wasFrr PLAN REP NO
.----------- - �- - - 10 WAST �w �� 17111
SR2901BARKER ROAD
PLOTTED BY _ DPOSTEN _ o IPA2DESIGNED BY MSKINNERIBKiRKMAN _ �_
JOB NUMBER
a
BNSF GRADE SEPARATION
ENTERED BY KMELBY _ _ �0, k�cisrt4�i.�$ww Washington State SPOKANE COUNTY - MP 12.5 SHEET
CHECKED BY RPARGAS CONTRACT NO. LOCATION NO. �`srONAL0- Department of Transportation 3
OF
- - --- -.�_.. - XL0143 '��a i � DATEINTERSECTION 19
PROD. ENGR. RPARGAS►SMARSHALLE SECTION PLAN
FOR APPROVAL
4 REGIONAL ADM. DESCRIPTION DATE NO. L P.E.STAMP BOX P.E.STAMP BOX--
SHEETS
__ _ _
___ __
S1AOF SW/OF SEC 32
T.26N . R.45E . W. M .
__
EQUATION _-
SR 290 MP 12.87 (AHEAD) =
SR 290 MP 12.89 (BACK) -
END
EB 227+60.00 (4.0' LT)
228+42.02 P.O.E.
END RADIUS '' ~
----- EB 226+50 35 (4.0' LT) ~~~
___ -`--lkGIN RADIUS 226+50. 5 P.T:-- - .3 "E -~
__________2z5,______
cn fT1 _� _
m Co co -�`�r- EB 222+98.43 (4.0' LT) __. --I_ 6 �,1 ~~~
fid . _ - - N END
N Z 222+98.43 P.G. ` , ' EB 227+60.00 (20.0' RTS
rrx L_
+ EB TRENT - - -
-
�Io � AV� gR29U - - - '
CD -
W :mac+•�r�� ~~
m _--"- CURVE 9 -
~~~~
CENTERLINE --' '28'
EB TRENT AVE '--' ~
- ~~
BEGIN RADIUS ---- --- ~
EB 222+98.43 (20.0' RT) - - ' '~-
-''- ' _ '" END RADIUS ~~~
EB 226+50.35 (20.0' RT) ~~~~~
-
-
-
-
CURVE DATA
CURVE P.I. STATION DELTA ' RADIUS TANGENT LENGTH
1 TR 103+92.50 25°00'21" LT 1050' 232.84' 458.26'
2 TR 107+91.11 15°14'46" RT 250' 33.46' 66.52' CONCURRENCE- - ""DATE // 7�
3 WB 110+76.66 58°16'27" LT 112' 62.43' 113.91' :-
4 WB 112+30.70 15°16'33" RT 512' 68.66' 136.51'
EASTERN REGION TRAFFIC GINEER
5 WB 114+08.40 10°21'27" RT 1212' 109.85' 219.09' APPROVED DATE /
at
6 WB 120+21.64 8°37'53° RT 1146' 86.48' 172.64'
EASTERN Ee'llf ASS STANT REGION
7 EB 215+08.76 21°57'20" RT 1255' 243.44' 480.91' LEGEND ADMINISTRATOR FOR DEVELOPMENT
8 EB 219+00.94 23°52'04" RT 732' 154.71' 304.93' I ALIGNMENT GW/SDOT APPRO!/AL IS ONLY FOR THE GEOMETRIC
9 EB 224+78.10 28°28'46" LT 708' 179.6T 351.92' - RIGHT OF WAY BOUNDARY DESIGN 141THIN THE HIGHWAY RIGHTS OF WAY
14 BA 94+03.27 15°50'26" LT 400' 55.65' 110.59' INCLUDING THOSE ACCESS CONTROLLED AREAS
15 WE 120+91.56 9°59'57" RT 1146' 100.25' 200.00' RETAINED BY WSDOT. RIGHT OF WAY LINES ARE
SHOWN FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY 1 I 1
0 40 80
SCALE IN FEET
FILE NAME capwworkingldealdms006031XL0143_PS_IPA_003.dgn
TIME 8:52:42 AM RELEASE FOR CONSTRUCTION RECORD REGION STATE FED.AID PROJ.NO. Plot 1
DATE 1111120'!9 - 10 WASH } ° 40a SR2901B�4RKER ROAD PLAN REF NO
PLOTTED BY DPOSTEN �- lz-, ., IPA3
BNSF GRADE SEPARATION
DESIGNED BY MSKINNER/BKIRKMAN JOB NUMBER
ENTERED BY KMELBY %I, �, i397,� rt,,
Washington State,� G� 4 �� SPOKANE COUNTY - MP 12.5 SHEET
CHECKED BY RPARGAS _ - CONTRACT NO. LOCATION NO. - sip NAL� Department of Transportation 7
PROJ. ENGR. RPARGASISMARSHALL XL0143 ' t 21.- of
DATE DATE
- INTERSECTION PLAN FOR APPROVAL19
REGIONAL ADM. DESCRIPTION DATE NO. P.E.STAMP BOX P.E.STAMP BOX SHEETS
ti T.2 ./T.26N. R.45E. W.M.
X„,,._,,..,,
.. : % '..
Yap �r--
:„.„-v"- •�
-_�'�= D 10D 200
` �` � _, SCALE IN FEET
Y7, ''%.'` ,4,,. , 'it. . ....._t -='- -- ......,: -.---,.,.
fila- / \ �a
N.. '-',. ---%----"-:----.:1----. -'L-N
i /f+ ice/ // \ \ /// N
.,,,,,,7" 4-,0-,','-,--‘,,,',•',-,,-,,,,„._,--.
',N
y 1
” ., ,::,, :‘,::s, • .• , ,
\:2''', •0=''V '' - -' ' of ,,
, - \ ':- \ „
' ‘:\s"\
',
C '.. N '.\ \ \ \ '-, ',•
I
/r /' '.. N
Plot 1
REVISIONS
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY DRAWN DATE PLAN REF.O
811
� SR2901BARKER ROAD
'
NO. DATE DESCRIPTION BY Sfial ane COMMUNITY&PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT EX
10210 EAST SPRAGUE AVENUE DESIGNED BNSF GRADE SEPARATION
d a Z v�I� SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 99206 SPOKANE COUNTY - MP 12.5
T o CHECKED BY cr
r Know what's below Ipl IP DAVID EVAN9 (509)720 000
N o ;, call before you dig. DAVID
1110. AERIAL EXHIBIT SHEETR
GCB 3305
Exhibit C
Description of work
Barker Road/BNSF Grade Separation Proi ect
1. Project Location and Existing Conditions
Barker Road is located in Spokane Valley,WA. The roadway crosses the BNSF mainline at railroad milepost
58.96. Barker Road is a two-lane,north-south minor arterial. Currently,there is one mainline track and one
planned future track at the crossing,which is protected by standard railroad gates and signals. The BNSF
corridor carries 52 trains a day. The existing Barker Road and State Route 290(Trent Ave.)is a"T"
intersection with stop control on Barker Road.
2. Purpose of the Project
The Barker Road/BNSF grade separation project will improve safety by replacing the existing at-grade BNSF
Railway(BNSF)crossing with an overpass,constructing a roundabout at the Barker/Trent intersection,and
closing the Flora/BNSF railway crossing.
When completed,the project will:
• improve emergency access,
• eliminate vehicle wait times averaging about 162 minutes per day at each of the two BNSF crossings,
• reduce overall traffic congestion and improve traffic flow,
• eliminate the need for trains to sound their horns,making adjacent neighborhoods quieter,
• improve access to the industrial area,and
• enhance ability to develop almost 600 acres of industrial property and attract new businesses and jobs.
3. Project Description
The Barker Road overpass will consist of a 2 lane,3 span bridge over the existing mainline and future BNSF
tracks. Bridge approach embankments will require up to 30 feet of fill. The bridge has a multi-use path on the
east side of the bridge. The project also constructs a two-lane roundabout at the intersection of Barker Road and
SR 290.
4. Environmental Review
The project has gone through both the National Environmental Policy Act(NEPA)and State Environmental
Policy Act(SEPA)processes. For NEPA,the project has received an approved Documented Categorical
Exclusion and under SEPA a Decision of Non-Significance(DNS).
5. Design Criteria
The AASHTO publication A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets(Green Book)is the design
standard accepted by FHWA for project funding. The design will also conform to the City of Spokane Valley
standards,WSDOT Design Manual,and AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications.
6. Construction Cost Estimate
The Engineer's Estimate of probable construction cost in year 2020 dollars is$20,533,391. This estimate
includes contract construction cost,construction administration, sales tax and contingencies. The actual
contract amount will be determined at the time of contract award.
GCB 3305 Page 1 of 1
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: June 30, 2020 Department Director Approval: El
Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ® admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Technology of Remote Council Meetings
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: Governor Inslee's Proclamation of March 24, 2020, waives and
suspends the requirement to hold in-person meetings and provides options for the public to attend
remotely.
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: None
BACKGROUND: In-person council meetings have been modified to the use of web conferencing
for purposes of maintaining the meeting schedule and allow for remote public participation. The
City has previously selected the Zoom Video Communication platform for video conferencing, and
so this platform was used for Council meetings as well.
There have been opportunities to learn from this platform and adjust meeting operations to allow
City Council meetings to continue while adhering to the Governor's proclamation noted above.
Council has requested an update to our current meeting platform and how we can provide a
better-quality meeting with attendees.
Zoom is a third party, externally hosted service. Connections made to the system are across the
Internet. Attendees' and participants' audio and video quality is subject to not only their own
connection, but also that of Zoom. We do not have control over these external connections. We
do maintain the Internet connection at City Hall, which is adequate and has not proven to be an
issue at this time.
The increase in public meetings over Zoom has increased the prevalence of malicious activity. In
order to help mitigate inappropriate activity, we have taken several steps to help ensure for a
successful remote meeting:
• Host and Co-Host —The recorded meeting is captured from a single host. The same host is
used to display any participant slides. The co-host station is used to monitor attendees,
enable/disable audio/video and ensure participants are unable to disrupt the meeting. This
helps make sure the broadcasted (TV/Recorded) meeting is appropriate.
• All incoming participant audio is muted by default. Zoom limits the ability to disable the video
upon initial connection to the meeting. If a participant joins with video, we promptly disable
their video. Once the video is disabled, the attendee cannot re-enable their camera.
We also do not allow participants to change their name after joining. This prevents the attendees
name from displaying anything inappropriate.
There are some other suggestions that may benefit the quality of the meeting:
• If a Councilmember's audio become garbled or inaudible, we ask the Councilmember to
"leave" and re-join the meeting immediately. This has solved the audio problem in the
past.
• Use the "raise hand" feature — Mute Councilmembers after roll call. The Mayor and City
Clerk may remain unmuted for purposes of managing the meeting.
• Webinar style meeting — Host only. No participant. Would require registration in order to
present/comment.
• Provide headset with boom mic for clearer audio.
• Disable video for remote presenters (eliminate video latency and potentially improve audio
quality).
OPTIONS: Discussion
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Discussion
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Zoom Video Conferencing software has been purchased with
an annual subscription ending April, 2021. If the City were to move to a different platform, there
may be additional costs.
STAFF CONTACT: Chad Knodel, IT Manager
ATTACHMENTS: Remote Council Meeting Technology PowerPoint
Remote Council Meeting
Technology
Chad Knodel, IT Manager
Why remote council meetings?
Governor Inslee 's Proclamation of March 24, 2020
waives and suspends the requirement to hold in -
person meetings and provides options for the
public to attend remotely
In order to accommodate social distancing
requirements and recommendations, remote
meetings are appropriate
How do we provide remote meetings?
Zoom - What is Zoom?
3rd party, externally hosted service
Connects across the Internet
Subject to quality of participant's own
connection
. .
What can we control?
Internet at City Hall
Access to the meeting ( participants)
What problems have we faced?
Hosting the meeting
lot- During the meeting, managing the participants is
difficult without interrupting the recorded video, or
what is visible to attendees.
IT Staff currently manages the meeting from a separate station
to mitigate inappropriate activity ("zoombombing")
Participant audio is muted by default
► Zoom limits ability to disable video upon initial
connection . Meeting host must disable if attendee
attempts to enable camera.
▪ Disable name changing - Prevents attendees name from
displaying inappropriate content.
What problems have we faced? ( cont . )
io Inaudible comments from Councilmembers
Likely related to Zoom software
Leaving and joining meeting resolves trouble
Inaudible participants
Potential issue with participant Internet connection
What can we do differently?
Mute councilmembers after roll call.
Mayor and City Clerk would remain unmuted for purposes of managing the
meeting
Councilmembers use "raise hand" feature of software to be called upon
Disable video for remote presenters/guests
Only allow audio from remote participants
Eliminates video latency for remote participants
Audio only reduces necessary bandwidth for participation
Webinar based meeting
■
This type of meeting would disable all participant video and prevent
malicious attacks
Meeting information would change
Require attendees to register to provide public comment
What can we do differently? (cont . )
Audio quality ( low volume, difficult to hear)
Headset with boom microphone may fix audio quality
of Councilmember comments
Inaudible (obviously garbled , incoherent)
r Leave and rejoin meeting •
Other options?
bo- There are several mainstream products available
(Teams, GoToMeeting, etc . )
lik- Same connectivity issues exist outside City's control
l� Learn new system
Ito- Financial impact for new software and implementation
Discussion
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: June 30, 2020 Department Director Approval: El
Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ® admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Potential Grant Opportunity—Transportation Improvement Board (TIB)
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 35/7.010: Six Year Transportation Improvement Program
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN:
• July 22, 2014 — City Council approval for staff to apply for project funding from TIB, including
Sullivan Road Preservation and Sidewalk project
• July 25, 2017 — City Council approval for staff to apply for project funding from TIB, including
Mullan Road Preservation project
• March 27, 2018 — City Council approval for staff to apply for project funding from SRTC,
including Mullan Road Preservation and Argonne Reconstruction (which included the
concrete reconstruction of the Argonne/Montgomery intersection with signal and
channelization upgrades)
• July 2, 2019 — City Council approval for staff to apply for project funding from TIB, including
Mullan Road Preservation and Argonne & Montgomery Intersection Reconstruction (which
covered only the north segment of the corridor reconstruction submitted in 2018 to SRTC).
• May 26, 2020 — Adoption of Resolution 20-009 adopting the 2021-2026 Six-Year
Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP)
BACKGROUND: On May 29, 2020, the Washington State TIB issued a Call for Projects for the
UAP (Urban Arterial Program). The UAP makes approximately $60M available statewide and
Spokane Valley is eligible to apply for funds from the northeast region's allocation of about
$6.4M. TIB requires a minimum 20% match for any awarded grant funds and additional points
can be scored for matching levels between 20% and 40%. Applications are due August 14,
2020.
The 2020 Call for Projects is dramatically different from years past due to revenue impacts
created by 1-976 and COVID-19. Originally, TIB budgeted $70M statewide for the UAP and $5M
statewide for the Sidewalk Program (SP). Typically, TIB awards the northeast region
approximately $8M for five to seven UAP projects. The 2020 northeast region's allocation is
$6.4M and it should be expected that only four or five UAP projects will be awarded. The 2020
SP has been eliminated completely. Since 2015, the SP awards the region three to five
sidewalk projects each year. Each of these years the City averaged $380,000 of TIB awards for
an annual sidewalk project.
TIB grant award results over the last three years provide insight into how preservation projects
have been awarded in the past and how they may be awarded in the future. Generally, UAP
project awards range between $1M to $2M and the average award is approximately $1.3M.
Twelve of the 18 awarded projects provided an overmatch of at least 5%. See Table 1 for a
detailed breakdown of recent UAP awards. It is staff's opinion that the 2020 call for projects will
result in a more competitive application environment than years past.
Table 1: 2017-2019 3-Yr Average Award Data for UAP Projects
Total Project Cost Amount Awarded % Overmatch
Median $1,900,985 $1,236,487 10%
Average $2,380,186 $1,317,354 16%
Minimum $494,150 $345,905 0%
Maximum $8,488,000 $2,541,029 60%
Total Number of Awarded Projects: 18 (2017: 6, 2018: 7, 2019: 5)
# of Awards—Award Size < $1M: 5 # of Awards — % Overmatch 0%: 5
# of Awards—Award Size $1M to $1.5M: 7 # of Awards — % Overmatch 1%-10%: 5
# of Awards—Award Size $1.5M to $2M: 4 # of Awards — % Overmatch 10%-20%: 4
# of Awards—Award Size > $2M: 2 # of Awards — % Overmatch <20%: 5
Staff has reviewed the grant scoring criterion and compared it to the City's 2021-2026 TIP,
Comprehensive Plan, pavement condition analysis, crash history, the SRTC contingency project
funding list, and other elements of the City's transportation network.
Based on the increased competitiveness for funding this year, staff has targeted funding
requests and City match amounts that are expected to be the most competitive. City matching
funds are to be funded by REET revenues. The proposed 2020 TIB application list is identified
in Table 2.
Cost estimates are currently being developed. The recommended City match amount assumes
a 20% minimum required match plus 10%-20% over-match, bringing the total match amount to
30%-40%. As cost estimates are finalized, staff will provide a recommended total City match
amount that best leverages each project's ability to score its best while fitting into the typical
funding "sweet spot." Final project cost estimates and match amounts will be provided as part of
the July 14 Council presentation.
Table 2. Proposed TIB Projects & Preliminary Total Costs
Project Name Total Estimated Cost Grant Request (%) City Match (%)
Urban Arterial Program (UAP)
1. Sullivan Road Preservation & $ - $ -
Sidewalk (Sprague to 8th Ave) $2,000,000 (60-70% (30-40%
Recommended) Recommended)
2. Argonne Corridor Reconstruction $ - $ -
(Indiana to Montgomery) $1,500,000 - 2,000,000 (60-70% (30-40%
Recommended) Recommended)
OPTIONS: Discussion.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Staff requests Council consensus to proceed with
the proposed projects. A final project list, cost estimates and recommended match amounts will
be brought to Council for a motion consideration at the July 14, 2020 Council meeting.
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: None at this time.
STAFF CONTACT: Adam Jackson, P.E. — Engineer— Planning & Grants
ATTACHMENTS: Presentation
Potential Grant Opportunity
Transportation Improvement Board
'n`
� "�°h s''fo
s
W I
p �
y
ort14
Impr°SOF.
June 30, 2020
SpOkane Adam Jackson, Engineer - Planning & Grants
f valley° Engineering Division
WHAT IS TIB?
Transportation Improvement Board
Independent state agency created by the Legislature
Distributes and manages street construction and maintenance
grants to 320 cities and urban counties
Funds are generated by three cents of the statewide gas tax
2020 TIB FUNDING
Applications d u e byAugust 14, 2 0 2 0 nation zrt PrpvzMznt Board
„'e.��Rrr�e t Funding Status Form duel-t
lad
pmxf>Rtrrma`s-�-zas4A9atBP.B $PQViA"E VALLEYPwjlt - Broa O•xaYAvenueAr9Rnn°Rd toMut;aRd20% Minimum Match Required � � Ieandra4aredt���VeritylureReturn t0vemnt B0TtaR%Ppd�rtmpm ,aapyo pex `�tlti�f shin
oiymp,a•19F.aSQ"riot ���✓
TransgtO�S1aPe
lytn: ipor[atFon c4svUrban ArteriaI Pro ram UAP mp�o �„e P.hwt,''n goar��prybltn AF�x���1� �^�mnwui.W,�CartnI—•�ar�o A•M!30.20p8
Cvmpreilanm_':::;,n;Cantr�Total program funds $60 million a, F�"°' _�� `e�na�aR§.P .E n9 Mana erPRtJ N of$Avkane ValleLusk alanalfuntliR': ,�,�...�.. ::::21,28:E 5YnOlnV=•rt=' "'b, e Vile'EVALLE'l m�++•+.�`"'„.. Y WR 99206spov„, rte-®,..„e.. r Man¢�{ wsQDTeyear t1Cit eli}�.�J i ble funds $6.3 million F�a F • aaseo 3 ,hots r®funds erer$a.507:6en
yV am. Yo e$i 50o epr leq,rl
Yoe,mar naw awe d the sss.k;cn eIs a
11011. .e.m= We o,, 8o ha ''''on Panum
�"y+....,„-,Z.,a^ Bann t78wt;tagurearil(w3:01)7 eue4l3rp s✓tae can v9n itu
Typical Award Value $ 1-2 million was Ginnae
��, mailat ��
awl A4 �d3�adU;x ['
Increased competitiveness i n 2020- �hleYProyart
TOTAL L, .. ExeGryVe Director
Signatr"• Baa,, a:chatse.WO!'
"
Wed. ..4c.,..4c.,,,
Illi' '—
Sidewalk Program — Suspended
lavas%fn your low commtm
3
RECOMMENDED PROJECTS
, .
�;.f c *. Trent Ave ,12'13Q
Argonne Corridor 0.131- � `#: ' + �# M .. -. • m. 1111*+#
ConcreteCC
•
,
10. E Mansfield Ave •
Reconstruction } E '90FwY E 1 90 F E /90F„,
up
(Ph. 2) z . E Sullivan Road
E I 90 y
Preservation and
E SpragueAve E SpragueAve E S ague,A • - Sidewalk
E4th Ave
ESthAve
sip
' *} +t i ' *+ 'tri
jo ■ .■ ■ ■ t " ■ 61
•
la
•
* .di • ■■.NIL ir F
* , E32rldA
ci
ix
T • 05
fY ' r n-ii, Tnrrn AVA
RECOMMENDED PROJECTS
Preliminary estimates are being developed . Cost estimates will be finalized by the
time of application but will not exceed the costs presented to Council as part of the
planned motion consideration on July 14, 2020.
Urban Arterial Program ( UAP)
Argonne/Montgomery Reconstruction (Ph . 2) $2 million
Completes the 2019 TIB funding of the Argonne/Montgomery Concrete Reconstruction
Generally bound by Indiana Ave. (south) and south property line of Longhorn BBQ (north)
Sullivan Road Preservation $ 1.5-2 million
Pavement preservation from Sprague to 8th Avenue
Potential for inclusion of sidewalk on west side of Sullivan from 4th to 8th Ave.
TIB supports sidewalk inclusion in its arterial preservation projects rather than standalone sidewalk projects.
Limited ROW available, staff to consider deviation for reduced sidewalk width vs. ROW acquisition.
QUESTIONS?
of
447 nip
on Imp
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: June 30,2020 Department Director Approval:
Check all that apply: ❑consent ❑old business ❑new business ❑public hearing
❑ information®admin.report ❑pending legislation ❑ executive session
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Administrative report — Updating chapter 9.20 SVMC regarding motorized
personal transportation devices(motorized foot scooters and electric assist bicycles).
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: Title 46 Motor Vehicles, Revised Code of Washington (RCW); RCW
46.04.336; RCW 46.20.500; RCW 46.61.710; RCW 46.61.715; Chapter 9.20 SVMC
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: November 16, 2004: Passed Ordinance 04-048 addressing
scooters; amended by Ordinance 07-005 passed by Council March 27, 2007, codified as SVMC 9.20s.
April 23,2019: Information Only Item regarding LIME Bike and Scooter-share program.
BACKGROUND: Use of electric-assisted bike and motorized foot scooter share programs, such as
LIME, have increased significantly in Washington state in recent years. Companies like LIME provide
electric-assisted bikes and motorized foot scooters to customers through smart phone apps. In response to
the increased use of electric-assisted bikes and motorized foot scooters share programs, the Washington
State Legislature enacted legislation regulating such use. The legislation, amending RCW Title 46,
generally provides the following:
1. Broadens the definition of motorized foot scooter;
2. Amends existing state regulations regarding motorized transportation devices by making
clear that they apply to motorized foot scooters as well. Such regulations include setting the
minimum operating age at 16, setting standard speed limits of 15 mph, prohibiting sidewalk
use for motorized scooters and Class 1 and Class 2 electric-assisted bicycles, and identifying
applicable motorized foot scooter parking regulations. These regulations may be modified by
local law, but if not modified, are the default applicable law for use of motorized foot
scooters;and
3. Authorizes local jurisdictions to contract for "shared" scooter and bicycle programs and to
establish applicable limits on such programs.
Chapter 9.20 SVMC regulates the operation of motorized personal transportation devices, including
motorized foot scooters and electric assist bicycles. Staff are proposing a number of changes to chapter
9.20 SVMC to remain consistent with state law. City code already prohibits usage on sidewalks and trails
and staff are not proposing modifications to such restrictions. These changes generally are as follows:
1. Add a purpose section;
2. Amend definitions to be consistent with broader state definitions,including adding Class 2 and
3 electric assist bicycles into the definition of motorized personal transportation devices;
3. Amending references to park regulations to align with new park regulations;
4. Prohibiting parking of motorized personal transportation devices on sidewalks where such
parking obstructs normal pedestrian use, and making any bike/scooter sharing companies
responsible for illegal sidewalk parking of their devices;
5. Allowing use of motorized personal transportation devices in bike lanes on streets with speed
limits greater than 25 mph; and
6. Making clear that the penalty for violation of chapter 9.20 SVMC is a traffic infraction and the
amount of the penalty.
Of note,the penalty for violation of chapter 9.20 SVMC is listed in the current code as a"Class 2 or Class
3 traffic infraction." However, the penalty must be limited to one amount to avoid legal challenges. A
class 2 infraction carries a penalty of $125 and a class 3 infraction carries a penalty of $50. Staff are
requesting direction from City Council on whether they desire the penalty to be $125 or $50, which is
shown highlighted in the draft Ordinance.
OPTIONS: (1) Consensus to place ordinance on a future agenda for first reading; or(2)take other action
as appropriate.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Consensus to place ordinance on future agenda for a first
reading.
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: There are no projected budget or financial impacts.
STAFF CONTACT: Erik Lamb,Deputy City Attorney; Carly Johnson,Legal Intern.
ATTACHMENTS: Draft Ordinance amending chapter 9.20 SVMC.
DRAFT
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
SPOKANE COUNTY,WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE 20-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY,
WASHINGTON,ADOPTING AMENDMENTS TO CHAPTER 9.20 OF THE SPOKANE
VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE TO UPDATE DEFINITIONS AND REGULATIONS
RELATING TO MOTORIZED PERSONAL TRANSPORTATION DEVICES, AND
OTHER MATTERS RELATING THERETO.
WHEREAS, the City of Spokane Valley previously adopted chapter 9.20 of the Spokane Valley
Municipal Code relating to the use of motorized personal transportation devices; and
WHEREAS, the use of motorized personal transportation devises has become more popular due
to motorized scooter and electric-assisted bicycle share programs; and
WHEREAS, the Washington State Legislature amended Title 46 of the Revised Code of
Washington responding to the increased use of motorized personal transportation devices and motorized
scooter share programs; and
WHEREAS,the changes in state law affect the current chapter 9.20 SVMC; and
WHEREAS,the City desires to make chapter 9.20 SVMC consistent with state law and responsive
to the increase use of motorized scooter and electric-assisted bicycle share programs; and
WHEREAS,the proposed changes are in the best interest of the health, safety, and welfare of the
citizens of the City.
NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley, Spokane County,
Washington,do ordain as follows:
Section 1. Amendment. Chapter 9.20 of the SVMC is hereby amended as follows:
9.20.010 Purpose
The purpose and intent of this chapter is to implement local regulations governing the use of motorized
personal transportation devices on city streets, sidewalks, trails, bike paths, and other public property.
9.20.0210 Definitions.
The following definitions are applicable in this chapter unless the context otherwise requires:
AE. "Approved bicycle helmet" means a head covering designed for safety that meets or exceeds the
required safety standards adopted by the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) 15 USCS
6004, or Z-00.4 set by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI), the Snell Foundation, the
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), or such subsequent nationally recognized standard
for helmet performance as may be adopted by the City of Spokane Valley. The helmet shall be equipped
with a neck or chin strap that shall be securely fastened while the motorized personal transportation device
is in motion.
B . "Approved motorcycle helmet" means a protective covering for the head consisting of a hard outer
shell,padding adjacent to and inside the outer shell, and a neck or chin strap type retention system,with a
Ordinance Amending SVMC 9.20 Page 1 of 5
DRAFT
label required by the Federal Consumer Product Safety Commission as adopted by the Code of Federal
Regulations, 16 CFR Section 1203.
C. "Electric-assisted bicycles," "class 1 electric-assisted bicycle," "class 2 electric-assisted bicycle," and
"class 3 electric-assisted bicycle" shall have the meanings as set forth in RCW 46.04.169 as now adopted
or hereafter amended.
LSD. "Modified or enhanced" means that any of the settings or equipment of the motorized personal
transportation device, including but not limited to those settings or equipment that affects displacement,
horsepower, or muffler effect have been altered to achieve greater power, higher speed, and/or better
performance than possible when the unit was delivered from the factory for sale.
EA. "Motorized foot scooter" is defined as set forth in RCW 46.04.336, as now adopted or hereafter
amended. . . . • . ..• . _ _ • _ - . -•. . . .. .. ..
designed to be stood upon (but may have a scat), . • - - . . .. -•-
electric motor that is capable of propelling the device with or without human propulsion.\
FG. "Motorized personal transportation device" shall be deemed to include motorized foot scooters,
motorized skateboards, pocket motorcycles, class 2 and 3 electric-assisted bicycles, and all other similar
devices, but shall exclude motorized wheelchairs, motor driven cycles, mopeds, class 1 electric-assisted
bicycles,motorcycles, and electronic personal assistive mobility devices.
GB. "Motorized skateboard"means every device with a platform on which the rider or operator balances,
the platform having two or more sets of wheels beneath it,propelled by an attached or auxiliary electric or
gasoline motor.
H. "Scooter share program," and "bike share program" mean a person offering shared motorized foot
scooters or electric-assisted bicycles for hire.
I. "Sidewalk"is defined as set forth in RCW 46.04.540 as now adopted or hereafter amended.
W."Street,"for the purposes of this chapter only,means the entire width between the curb boundary lines,
including any designated bike lanes and the shoulder, of every way publicly maintained in the City of
Spokane Valley when any part thereof is open to the use of the public for purposes of vehicular travel or
parking.
9.20.0230 Duty to obey rules of the road.
Any person operating a motorized personal transportation device on a street shall obey all rules of the road
applicable to motor vehicles, as well as the commands of official traffic control signals, signs, and other
control devices applicable to motor vehicles, unless otherwise directed by a law enforcement official or
their designee. Every person operating a motorized personal transportation device on a street is granted all
of the rights and is subject to all of the duties and responsibilities applicable to the driver of a motor vehicle
pursuant to Chapter 308-330 WAC, except WAC 308-330-500 through 308-330-540 relating to bicycle
licensing, as adopted or hereafter amended, a copy of which will be kept on file in the city clerk's office,
and pursuant to Chapter 9.05 SVMC except as to those provisions thereof which by their very nature can
have no application.
9.20.0340 Requirements for operating motorized personal transportation devices.
A.Minimum Age.No person shall operate a motorized personal transportation device on a street, alley,or
other public area unless such person is 16 years of age or older.
Ordinance Amending SVMC 9.20 Page 2 of 5
DRAFT
B. Passengers—Towing. Only one person shall occupy a motorized personal transportation device at one
time.An operator of a motorized personal transportation device shall not transport passengers or tow other
devices or persons behind a motorized personal transportation device.
C. Helmet Required. Any person operating a motorized personal transportation device propelled by an
internal combustion engine upon any street, alley or other public place in the City shall wear an approved
motorcycle helmet designed for safety on his or her head and shall have the neck or chin strap of the helmet
fastened securely while the motorized personal transportation device is in motion or operation.
D. Lighting Required.
1.All motorized personal transportation devices,when in use on any street,alley,or other public area,
shall be equipped with a functioning lamp on the front that shall emit a white light visible from a
distance of at least 500 feet to the front.
2.All motorized personal transportation devices,when in use on any street,alley or other public area,
shall be equipped with a functioning red reflector on the rear of the motorized personal transportation
device, of a type approved by the Washington State Patrol,that is visible from all distances up to 600
feet to the rear when directly in front of lawful lower beams of the head lamps on a motor vehicle. A
lamp that emits a red light visible from a distance of 500 feet to the rear may be used in addition to the
red reflector.A light-emitting diode (LED)flashing tail light that is visible from a distance of 500 feet
to the rear may likewise be used in addition to the red reflector.
3. All motorized personal transportation devices in operation on a street shall be equipped with a stop
lamp or lamps on the rear of the motorized personal transportation device which shall display a red or
amber light,or any shade of color between red and amber,visible from a distance of not less than 300
feet to the rear in normal sunlight, and which shall be actuated upon application of a service brake.
E.Muffler Required.Motorized personal transportation devices powered by an internal combustion engine
shall have a properly functioning engine muffler attached and constantly operational during use of the
motorized personal transportation device to prevent a noise nuisance as prohibited by SVMC 7.05.040(0).
The use of a cutout, bypass, or similar muffler elimination device is prohibited on all motorized personal
transportation devices that are powered by an internal combustion engine.
F. Brake Required. Motorized personal transportation devices shall be equipped with a rear brake which,
when applied,enables the operator to make the braked wheel(s)skid on dry,level,clean pavement.
G. Modifications Prohibited. Motorized personal transportation devices operated within the City of
Spokane Valley shall not be modified or enhanced in design or construction from the specifications as
provided by the manufacturer or as otherwise required by Spokane Valley Municipal Code provisions or
the Revised Code of Washington.
9.20.0450 Prohibited areas.
A. Parks. All prohibitions and regulations applicable to motorized vehicles in City parks as set forth in
chapter 6.05 SVMC shall apply to Mmotorized personal transportation devices, and without limitation,
motorized personal transportation devices are prohibited from all City parks, except in public streets,
parking areas,parking lots or such designated areas where motorized vehicular use is allowed. Use within
such areas shall be subject to all applicable state and local laws,including,but not limited to,Title 46 RCW
and chapter 6.05 SVMC. pursuant to SVMC 6.05.070(G). Violations of this restriction are subject to the
Gpecific penalties set forth in SVMC 6.05.090 and 6.05.100.
B. Sidewalks. It is unlawful for any person to operate or ride a motorized personal transportation device on
any sidewalk within the City of Spokane Valley City limits.
Ordinance Amending SVMC 9.20 Page 3 of 5
DRAFT
C. Public Trails.It is unlawful for any person to operate or ride a motorized personal transportation device
on any public trails,including the Centennial and Appleway Trails,within the City of Spokane Valley City
limits.
D.Certain Streets.It is unlawful for any person to operate or ride a motorized personal transportation device
on any street with a speed limit greater than 25 miles per hour, except within designated bike lanes on such
streets.
E. Parking - Generally. Parking of motorized personal transportation devices is prohibited on all public
sidewalks when such parking interferes, impairs, obstructs,blocks, or impedes the free and full use of the
sidewalk. Any motorized personal transportation device parked illegally shall be subject to removal by the
City or its contractor.
F. Parking - Scooter or bike share. Any scooter or bike share company responsible for or owning a
motorized personal transportation device parked illegally pursuant to this section shall be deemed to have
committed a traffic infraction subject to the penalties set forth in this chapter.
9.20.0560 Applicability of other traffic laws.
The following criminal traffic laws shall apply to the operation of motorized personal transportation devices
within the City of Spokane Valley:
A.Negligent Driving-First Degree-RCW 46.61.5249,as adopted by reference in WAC 308-330-425,as
adopted or hereafter amended, and kept on file in the city clerk's office, and pursuant to Chapter 9.05
SVMC.
B.Negligent Driving-Second Degree -RCW 46.61.525, as adopted by reference in WAC 308-330-425,
as adopted or hereafter amended, and kept on file in the city clerk's office, and pursuant to Chapter 9.05
SVMC.
C. Reckless Driving - RCW 46.61.500, as adopted by reference in WAC 308-330-425, as adopted or
hereafter amended, and kept on file in the city clerk's office,and pursuant to Chapter 9.05 SVMC.
D. Driving Under the Influence - RCW 46.61.502, as adopted by reference in WAC 308-330-425, as
adopted or hereafter amended, and kept on file in the city clerk's office, and pursuant to Chapter 9.05
SVMC.
E.Driver Under 21 Consuming Alcohol-RCW 46.61.503,as adopted by reference in WAC 308-330-425,
as adopted or hereafter amended, and kept on file in the city clerk's office, and pursuant to Chapter 9.05
SVMC.
9.20.0670 Dealer notice required.
All persons and/or establishments in the City of Spokane Valley involved in the retail sale,er-lease,rental,
or "sharing," of motorized personal transportation devices shall provide to each purchaser, renter, or user
of said motorized personal transportation device written notice of the regulations, restrictions, and
requirements of this chapter prior to completing the sale, er-lease, rental, or "sharing" of said motorized
personal transportation device.
9.20.0780 Violation-Penalty.
Except as otherwise provided herein,Arany person violating any provision of this chapter,except for SVMC
9.20.010(B), shall be deemed to have committed a . • , : • ... . : •• traffic
infraction and shall be subject to a penalty of [$125.00/$50.00]. However, conduct that constitutes a
violation of a rule of the road, or constitutes a criminal traffic offense,may also be charged as such and is
subject to the maximum penalties allowed for such an offense or offenses.
Ordinance Amending SVMC 9.20 Page 4 of 5
DRAFT
A violation of this chapter for a minor under the age of 16 shall result in a referral to the Spokane County
juvenile justice system for resolution.
Section 2. Other sections unchanged. All other provisions of Title 9 SVMC not specifically
referenced hereto shall remain in full force and effect.
Section 3. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance shall be
held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or
unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section,sentence,clause,or
phrase of this Ordinance.
Section 4. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect five days after
publication of this Ordinance or summary therefor in the official newspaper of the City of Spokane Valley
as provided by law.
Passed by the City Council this day of ,2020
Ben Wick,Mayor
ATTEST:
Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk
Approved as to Form:
Office of the City Attorney
Date of Publication:
Effective Date:
Ordinance Amending SVMC 9.20 Page 5 of 5
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: June 30, 2020 Department Director Approval:
Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ® admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Authority to regulate vapor product retail sales.
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: Chapter 70.345 RCW; Wash. Const. Art. XI, Sec. 11.
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: None specific to zoning vapor product retailers.
BACKGROUND:
1. Zoning Vapor Retail Shops.
City Council has requested information regarding the City's authority to regulate the location of
vapor retail shops within Spokane Valley, and specifically whether the City may preclude such
shops from being near schools.
Generally, the City may adopt any zoning regulations as part of its police powers, unless the
zoning regulations are in conflict with state law, in which case they are "preempted." Chapter
70.345 RCW governs vapor products and who has authority to conduct sales at retail of such
products. It specifically preempts local governments from regulating "vapor product...sales at
retail." RCW 70.345.210. Courts have found that regulations that "amount to regulations on
vapor product...sales" are preempted. Zoning the locations of vapor product retail stores may
not, on its face, be precluded. However, if such regulation "amounts" to regulating vapor product
sales, it would be preempted.
Currently, the City regulates vapor product retail stores under the general category of "Retail
Sales and Service." Retail uses are permitted outright in the Mixed Use, Corridor Mixed Use,
Regional Commercial, and Industrial Mixed Use zones, and certain types of retail sales are
permitted in the Neighborhood Commercial, Industrial and Parks Zones. Thus, to adopt
regulations specific to vapor product retail shops, the City would have to adopt a new definition
for "vapor product retail sales" and regulate that separately from other types of retail shops.
However, vapor products are sold at a large number of different types of retail shops. Examples
of retail stores where vapor products are currently sold include, but are not limited to 7-Eleven,
Albertson's, Cenex Zip Trip, Fred Meyer, Hico, Maverick, Mobil, Raja Market, Safeway, Sam's
Stop, Tesoro, and Walgreens.
If the City adopted separate regulations for vapor product retail shops, it would not address any
of the stores listed above, and the new regulations would not preclude them from selling vapor
products in locations near K-12 schools. The only way to address such sales would be to
directly limit sales at retail, which is clearly preempted by RCW 70.345.210.
Further, if the City only regulated the locations of vapor product retail shops, it could be found to
"amount" to a regulation on sales at retail since it would arguably put such shops at a
disadvantage due to the more limited number of locations they could sell their products. Even if
it didn't, regulations aimed at one type of shop while still allowing other types of shops to sell
products within proximity of schools would undercut the primary purpose — namely to limit sales
by any stores near K-12 schools.
Thus, to effectively limit vapor product sales near schools, the City would likely have to either
directly regulate vapor product sales in all types of retail stores, which it is preempted from
doing, or limit all retail sales near schools, which would be impractical.
2. Other Related Regulations.
While zoning vapor retail shops may not be feasible, staff have identified a number of other
actions taken by the State and Spokane Regional Health District that have the effect of limiting
youth access to vapor products. First, effective January 1, 2020, the State Legislature raised
the minimum age to purchase vapor products from 18 to 21. See RCW 26.28.080; chapter
70.155 RCW. Part of the basis for the change was the easy access by high school-aged youth
and a desire to limit that access. The State Board of Health also passed an emergency rule later
in 2019, prohibiting flavored vapor products. While the emergency rule expired in February,
2020, the Legislature debated adopting flavor-restrictions and may address the issue again in
the future. Finally, the Spokane Regional Health District has adopted regulations prohibiting
vaping and use of vaping devices in any public place or place of employment.
OPTIONS: Discussion.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Discussion.
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: N/A.
STAFF CONTACT: Erik Lamb, Deputy City Attorney
ATTACHMENTS: none
DRAFT
ADVANCE AGENDA
as of June 25,2020; 9:30 a.m.
Please note this is a work in progress;items are tentative
To: Council& Staff
From: City Clerk,by direction of City Manager
Re: Draft Schedule for Upcoming Council Meetings
July 7,2020, Study Session,6:00 p.m. [due Tue June 301
1. CARES Grant—Chelsie Taylor (25 minutes)
2. Governance Manual Revisions—Chris Bainbridge,Cary Driskell (20 minutes)
3.Advance Agenda—Mayor Wick (5 minutes)
[*estimated meeting: 50 mins]
July 14,2020,Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Tue July 71
Proclamation: Parks and Recreation Month
1. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes)
2.Motion Consideration: Potential Grant Oppor: Transp.Improvement Board(TIB)—A.Jackson (15 minutes)
3.Admin Report: Council Goals&Priorities for Use of Lodging Tax—Chelsie Taylor (15 minutes)
4.Admin Report: Advance Agenda—Mayor Wick (5 minutes)
[*estimated meeting: 40 mins]
July 21,2020, Study Session, 6:00 p.m. Idue Tue July 14]
1.Advance Agenda (5 minutes)
July 28,2020,Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Tue July 21]
1. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes)
2.Motion Consideration: Council Goals&Priorities for Use of Lodging Tax—Chelsie Taylor (10 minutes)
3.Admin Report: Spokane Arts Council Sculpture Presentation—Mike Stone (10 minutes)
4.Admin Report: Advance Agenda—Mayor Wick (5 minutes)
5. Info Only: Department Monthly Reports [*estimated meeting: 30 mins]
August 4,2020, Special Meeting: Budget Workshop 8:30 a.m.—2:30 p.m. [due Tue July 28]
August 4,2020,Study Session, 6:00 p.m. - Cancelled
August 11,2020,Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Tue Aug 4]
1. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes)
2.Admin Report: Advance Agenda—Mayor Wick (5 minutes)
August 18,2020, Study Session,6:00 p.m. [due Tue Aug 111
1. Council 2021 Budget Goals—Chelsie Taylor (20 minutes)
2.Advance Agenda
August 25,2020,Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. [due Tue Aug 18]
1. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes)
2.Admin Report: Advance Agenda—Mayor Wick (5 minutes)
3. Info Only: Department Monthly Reports
Sept 1,2020,Study Session,6:00 p.m. [due Tue Aug 251
1.Advance Agenda (5 minutes)
Draft Advance Agenda 6/25/2020 11:27:32 AM Page 1 of 2
Sept 8,2020,Formal Meetin2 Format,6:00 p.m. [due Tue Sept 11
1. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes)
2.Admin Report: Estimated Revenues&Expenditures,2021 Budget—Chelsie Taylor (15 minutes)
3.Admin Report: Advance Agenda—Mayor Wick (5 minutes)
Sept 15,2020, Study Session,6:00 p.m. [due Tue Sept 81
1. Outside Agency Presentation(max 5 minutes each)—Chelsie Taylor (—60 mins)
2.Advance Agenda—Mayor Wick (5 minutes)
Sept 22,2020,Formal Meetin2 Format,6:00 p.m. [due Tue Sept 151
1. Public Hearing#1 —2020 Budget Revenues and Property Taxes—Chelsie Taylor (15 minutes)
2. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes)
3.Motion Consideration: Set 2021 Budget Hearing#2 for Oct 27—Chelsie Taylor (5 minutes)
4.Admin Report: Washington State Dept. of Trans Land Acquisition,Flora Road—C. Driskell (10 minutes)
5.Admin Report: Advance Agenda—Mayor Wick (5 minutes)
6. Info Only: Department Monthly Reports
Sept 29,2020,Study Session,6:00 p.m. [due Tue Sept 221
1. Proposed Ordinance Adopting 2021 Property Taxes—Chelsie Taylor (10 minutes)
2.Advance Agenda (5 minutes)
Oct 6,2020, Study Session,6:00 p.m. [due Tue Sept 291
1.Admin Report: City Manager Presents 2021 Preliminary Budget—Mark Calhoun (60 minutes)
2.Advance Agenda (5 minutes)
Oct 13,2020,Formal Meetin2 Format,6:00 p.m. [due Tue Oct 61
1. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes)
*time for public or Council comments not included
OTHER PENDING AND/OR UPCOMING ISSUES/MEETINGS:
Appleway Trail Amenities
Art Sculptures Placements
Artwork&Metal Boxes
Comp Plan Amendments
Core Beliefs Resolution
Donation Recognition
Fee Resolution Cost of Service Analysis
Flashing Beacons/School Signage
Health District Re SV Stats
Mirabeau Park Forestry Mgmt.
Naming City Facilities Protocol
Park Lighting
PFD Presentation
Proclamation Supporting PD
SPEC Report/Update
St. Illumination(owners,cost,location)
St. O&M Pavement Preservation
Tourism Venues(12/8/2020)
Trunk or Treat
Utility Facilities in ROW
Water Districts&Green Space
Way Finding Signs
Draft Advance Agenda 6/25/2020 11:27:32 AM Page 2 of 2
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
Spokane Chelsie Taylor,Finance Director
48000 Val 10210 E Sprague Avenue • Spokane Valley WA 99206
LLii J Phone: (509)720-5000 •Fax: (509)720-5075 •
www.spokanevalley.org
Memorandum
To: Mark Calhoun, City Manager
From: Chelsie Taylor, Finance Director
Date: June 24, 2020
Re: Finance Department Activity Report— May 2020
Following is information pertaining to Finance Department activities through the end of May 2020
and included herein is an updated 2020 Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and
Expenditures through the end of May.
2019 Year-end Process
The 2019 books were closed in May and the annual financial report was completed and filed on
June 171h. The State Auditor's Office was onsite on June 22nd to begin the annual audit.
2021 Budclet Development
The 2021 Budget development process began in the Finance Department in early March, and
on April 7th we sent detailed budget requests to all departments to complete by mid-May. By the
time the budget is scheduled to be adopted on November 241h, the Council will have had an
opportunity to discuss the budget on seven occasions including three public hearings.
• August 4 Council budget workshop
• September 8 Admin report on 2021 revenues and expenditures
• September 22 Public hearing #1 on the 2021 revenues and expenditures
• October 13 City Manager's presentation of preliminary 2021 Budget
• October 27 Public hearing #2 on 2021 Budget
• November 10 First reading on proposed ordinance adopting the 2021 Budget
• November 24 Public hearing #3 on the 2021 Budget
• November 24 Second reading on proposed ordinance adopting the 2021 Budget
Budclet to Actual Comparison Report
A report reflecting 2020 Budget to Actual Revenues and Expenditures for those funds for which
a 2020 Budget was adopted is located on pages 5 through 17. Because we attempt to provide
this information in a timely manner, this report is prepared from records that are not formally
closed by the Finance Department at month end or reconciled to bank records. Although it is
realistic to expect the figures will change over subsequent weeks, I believe the report is materially
accurate.
We've included the following information in the report:
• Revenues by source for all funds, and expenditures by department in the General Fund and
by type in all other funds.
• A breakdown between recurring and nonrecurring revenues and expenditures in the General
Fund, Street O&M Fund and Stormwater Fund.
P:IFinancelFinance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports1202012020 05 31.docx Page 1
• The change in fund balance including beginning and ending figures. The beginning fund
balance figures are those that are reflected in our 2019 Annual Financial Report.
• Columns of information include:
o The 2020 Budget as adopted
o May 2020 activity
o Cumulative 2020 activity through May 2020
o Budget remaining in terms of dollars
o The percent of budgeted revenue collected or budgeted expenditures disbursed
A few points related to the General Fund #001 (page 5):
Recurring revenues collections are currently at 33.49% of the amount budgeted with 41.67% of
the year elapsed.
• Property taxes are paid to Spokane County in two installments each year on April 30 and
October 31 and are then remitted to the City primarily in May and November with lesser
amounts typically remitted in June and December. Property taxes received thus far in 2020
are $4,757,299 or 38.27% of the amount budgeted. This is slightly less than the same
period in 2019 due to Spokane County extending the deadline for property owners to pay
property taxes.
• Sales tax collections represent only four months of collections thus far because taxes
collected in May are not remitted to the City by the State until the latter part of June.
Collections are currently at$7,345,701 or 29.82% of the amount budgeted.
• Gambling taxes are at $16,890 or 4.40% of the amount budgeted. Gambling taxes are paid
quarterly with first quarter payments due by April 30. However, due to COVID-19, Council
approved the delay of first quarter payments of gambling taxes until September 30 and second
quarter until November 30.
• Franchise Fee and Business Registration revenues are typically received in the month
following a calendar year quarter. So far in 2020 we have received $326,937 or 26.80% of the
amount budgeted.
• State shared revenues are composed of State of Washington distributions that include items
such as liquor board profits, liquor excise tax, streamlined sales tax mitigation and criminal
justice monies. Most of these revenues are paid by the State in the month following a
calendar quarter. Through May we've received remittances totaling $567,199 or 33.60% of
the amount budgeted.
• Fines and forfeitures revenues are composed of monthly remittances from Spokane County
with payments made in the month following the actual assessment of a fine and false alarm
fees. Through May we've received remittances through the month of April with receipts of
$262,299 or 24.34% of the amount budgeted.
• Community and Public Works service revenues are largely composed of building permit and
plan review fees as well as right of way permits. Revenues are currently at$1,621,020 or
76.11% of the amount budgeted.
• Recreation program revenues are composed of revenues generated by the variety of parks
and recreation programs including classes, swimming pools (in-season), and CenterPlace.
Currently, revenues total $117,304 or 17.79% of the amount budgeted. There were negative
May revenues due to refunds related to COVID-19 cancellation of events.
Recurring expenditures are currently at$15,880,915 or 36.74% of the amount budgeted with
41.67% of the year elapsed.
P:IFinancelFinance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports1202012020 05 31.docx Page 2
Investments (page 18)
Investments at May 31 total $74,750,233 and are composed of $69,615,013 in the Washington
State Local Government Investment Pool and $5,135,220 in bank CDs.
Total Sales Tax Receipts (page 19)
Total sales tax receipts reflect State remittances through May and total $8,319,669 including
general, criminal justice, and public safety taxes. This figure is $39,720 or 0.48% less than the
same four-month period in 2019; however, the decrease in May was 16.34%. The May drop
reflects the effects of COVID-19 on City tax collections, which we expected to start seeing in this
month's collections.
Economic Indicators (pages 20—22)
The following economic indicators provide information pertaining to three different sources of tax
revenue that provide a good gauge of the health and direction of the overall economy.
1. Sales taxes (page 20) provide a sense of how much individuals and businesses are spending
on the purchase of goods.
2. Hotel / Motel taxes (page 21) provide us with a sense of overnight stays and visits to our area
by tourists or business travelers.
3. Real Estate Excise taxes (page 22) provide us with a sense of real estate sales.
Page 20 provides a 10-year history of general sales tax receipts (not including public safety or
criminal justice) with monthly detail beginning January 2011.
• Compared with calendar year 2019, 2020 collections have decreased by $48,609 or 0.66%.
• Tax receipts reached an all-time high in 2019 at $24,204,762, besting the previous record
year of 2018 when $22,642,856 was collected.
• This activity reflects the beginning of the effects of COVID-19 on the economy.
Page 21 provides a 10-year history of hotel/motel tax receipts with monthly detail beginning
January 2011.
• Compared with calendar year 2019, 2020 collections have decreased by $34,287 or 20.92%.
• Collections reached an all-time high in 2019 of$743,851, exceeding the previous high set in
2018 of$646,976.
• This activity reflects the beginning of the effects of COVID-19 on the economy.
Page 22 provides a 10-year history of real estate excise tax receipts with monthly detail beginning
January 2011.
• Compared with calendar year 2019, 2020 collections have decreased by $4,318 or 0.50%.
• Collections reached an all-time high in 2018 of $3,800,432, and subsequently decreased to
$3,333,549 in 2019.
• This activity reflects the beginning of the effects of COVID-19 on the economy.
Debt Capacity and Bonds Outstandinci (page 23)
This page provides information on the City's debt capacity, or the dollar amount of General
Obligation (G.O.) Bonds the City may issue, as well as an amortization schedule of the bonds the
City currently has outstanding.
• The maximum amount of G.O. bonds the City may issue is determined by the assessed value
for property taxes which for 2020 is $10,200,357,539. Following the December 1, 2019 debt
service payments, the City has $11,715,000 of nonvoted G.O. bonds outstanding which
represents 7.66% of our nonvoted bond capacity, and 1.53% of our total debt capacity for all
types of bonds. Of this amount:
P:IFinancelFinance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports1202012020 05 31.docx Page 3
o $4,390,000 remains on bonds issued for the construction of CenterPlace. These bonds
are repaid with a portion of the 1/10 of 1% sales tax that is collected by the Spokane Public
Facilities District.
o $590,000 remains on bonds issued for road and street improvements around CenterPlace.
The bonds are repaid with a portion of the real estate excise tax collected by the City.
o $6,735,000 remains on bonds issued for construction of the new City Hall. The bonds are
to be repaid with General Fund revenues.
Street Fund Revenue Sources (pages 24 and 25)
The last two charts reflect a history for the two primary sources of revenue in Street Fund #101.
These include:
• Page 24 provides a 10-year history of Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax collections with monthly detail
beginning January 2011.
o Compared with calendar year 2019, 2020 collections have decreased by $45,426 or
7.50%.
o Tax receipts peaked in 2007 at just approximately $2.1 million, and subsequently
decreased to a range of approximately $1,858,000 to $2,027,000 in the years 2011
through 2019.
o This activity reflects the beginning of the effects of COVID-19 on the economy.
• Page 25 provides a 10-year history of Telephone Utility Tax collections with monthly detail
beginning January 2011.
o Compared with 2019, 2020 collections have decreased by $46,641 or 8.73%. Unlike tax
revenues collected by the State and remitted monthly, these taxes are paid to the City
directly by the service provider. Consequently there is not a"clean cutoff' in terms of when
a vendor pays the tax.
o Tax receipts peaked in 2009 at $3,054,473 and have decreased each year since due to
what we suspect is the reduction in land lines by individual households.
o The 2020 Budget is set at $1,521,000. We will watch actual receipts closely as the year
progresses.
o The City has hired a consultant to perform an audit of providers who pay the telephone
utility tax. The audit will assess whether providers are accurately remitting all taxes owed
to the City, and the consultant will be paid on a contingent basis out of revenues recovered
from the telephone providers. Three audits have been completed, and the City has
received payments totaling $398,865 which is comprised of recovered revenue plus
interest and penalty fees. Per the contract with the consultant, the City paid $99,716 or
25% of the amount recovered.
P:IFinancelFinance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports1202012020 05 31.docx Page 4
P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2020\2020 05 31
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA Budget Year 2020
Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures Elapsed= 41.67%
For the Five-Month Period Ended May 31,2020
2020
Actual Actual through Budget %of
Budget May May 31 Remaining Budget
#001 -GENERAL FUND
RECURRING ACTIVITY
Revenues
Property Tax 12,432,400 4,199,718 4,757,299 (7,675,101) 38.27%
Sales Tax 24,632,900 1,627,596 7,345,701 (17,287,199) 29.82%
Sales Tax-Public Safety 1,162,600 80,872 354,591 (808,009) 30.50%
Sales Tax-Criminal Justice 2,052,300 139,084 619,377 (1,432,923) 30.18%
Gambling Tax and Leasehold Excise Tax 384,000 3,954 16,890 (367,110) 4.40%
Franchise Fees/Business Registration 1,220,000 8,158 326,937 (893,063) 26.80%
State Shared Revenues 1,688,200 0 567,199 (1,121,001) 33.60%
Fines, Forfeitures and Penalties 1,077,700 48,651 262,299 (815,401) 24.34%
Community and Public Works 2,129,800 379,879 1,621,020 (508,780) 76.11%
Recreation Program Revenues 659,200 (1,511) 117,304 (541,896) 17.79%
Miscellaneous Department Revenue 21,000 71 20,921 (79) 99.62%
Miscellaneous&Investment Interest 791,700 23,161 159,386 (632,314) 20.13%
Transfers in-#105(h/m tax-CP advertising) 30,000 0 0 (30,000) 0.00%
Total Recurring Revenues 48,281,800 6,509,634 16,168,924 (32,112,876) 33.49%
Expenditures
City Council 622,187 59,496 257,279 364,908 41.35%
City Manager 997,882 72,475 369,549 628,333 37.03%
City Attorney 707,942 50,583 254,871 453,071 36.00%
Public Safety 26,599,214 2,296,913 10,140,758 16,458,456 38.12%
Deputy City Manager 277,187 19,595 133,152 144,035 48.04%
Finance/IT 1,478,523 105,609 549,738 928,785 37.18%
Human Resources 313,316 25,387 122,888 190,428 39.22%
City Hall Operations and Maintenance 296,270 30,962 122,485 173,785 41.34%
Community&Public Works-Engineering 1,971,731 115,128 629,534 1,342,197 31.93%
Community&Public Works-Econ Dev 1,119,829 80,689 354,445 765,384 31.65%
Community&Public Works-Bldg&Plan 2,420,414 170,851 934,900 1,485,514 38.63%
Parks&Rec-Administration 352,227 23,923 124,240 227,987 35.27%
Parks&Rec-Maintenance 917,500 70,403 299,682 617,818 32.66%
Parks&Rec-Recreation 325,921 10,866 67,367 258,554 20.67%
Parks&Rec-Aquatics 501,853 12,620 18,618 483,235 3.71%
Parks&Rec-Senior Center 43,447 2,296 12,055 31,392 27.75%
Parks&Rec-CenterPlace 965,359 48,596 302,431 662,928 31.33%
General Government 1,321,111 59,129 357,726 963,385 27.08%
Transfers out-#204('16 L TGO bond debt service) 401,450 33,454 167,271 234,179 41.67%
Transfers out-#309(park capital projects) 160,000 13,333 66,667 93,333 41.67%
Transfers out-#311 (Pavement Preservation) 982,023 81,835 409,176 572,847 41.67%
Transfers out-#501 (CenterPlace kitchen reserve) 36,600 3,050 15,250 21,350 41.67%
Transfers out-#502(insurance premium) 410,000 34,167 170,833 239,167 41.67%
Total Recurring Expenditures 43,221,986 3,421,361 15,880,915 27,341,071 36.74%
Recurring Revenues Over(Under)
Recurring Expenditures 5,059,814 3,088,273 288,009 (4,771,805)
Page 5
P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2020\2020 05 31
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA Budget Year 2020
Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures Elapsed= 41.67%
For the Five-Month Period Ended May 31,2020
2020
Actual Actual through Budget %of
Budget May May 31 Remaining Budget
#001 -GENERAL FUND-continued
NONRECURRING ACTIVITY
Revenues
Potential Settlement Proceeds 0 0 0 0 0.00%
Grant Proceeds 70,000 0 0 (70,000) 0.00%
Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 0.00%
Total Nonrecurring Revenues 70,000 0 0 (70,000) 0.00%
Expenditures
Public Safety(carpet&workstation replacement) 15,000 0 0 15,000 0.00%
Public Safety(full facility generator) 0 1,310 86,109 (86,109) 0.00%
Public Safety(SV Police Athletic League Grant) 0 0 1,263 (1,263) 0.00%
City Hall Chambers(east wall repairs) 0 42,094 143,220 (143,220) 0.00%
Building(equipment for new code enf officer) 13,700 0 0 13,700 0.00%
Community&Public Works(Appleway Trail ED Sti 0 3,531 19,116 (19,116) 0.00%
Parks&Rec(CenterPlace carpeting) 9,500 0 0 9,500 0.00%
General Government (City Hall generator) 0 250 250 (250) 0.00%
General Government-IT capital replacements 190,000 0 81,653 108,347 42.98%
Gen Gov(Covid-19 Emergency Social Serv.) 0 0 33,000 (33,000) 0.00%
Transfers out-#122(replenish reserve) 0 0 0 0 0.00%
Transfers out-#309(CenterPlace West Lawn) 1,500,000 0 0 1,500,000 0.00%
Transfers out-#501 (new code enf vehicle) 30,000 0 0 30,000 0.00%
Total Nonrecurring Expenditures 1,758,200 47,185 364,609.36 1,393,591 20.74%
Nonrecurring Revenues Over(Under)
Nonrecurring Expenditures (1,688,200) (47,185) (364,609) 1,323,591
Excess(Deficit)of Total Revenues
Over(Under)Total Expenditures 3,371,614 3,041,088 (76,600) (3,448,214)
Beginning fund balance 37,427,218 37,427,218
Ending fund balance 40,798,832 37,350,617
Page 6
P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2020\2020 05 31
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA Budget Year 2020
Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures Elapsed= 41.67%
For the Five-Month Period Ended May 31,2020
2020
Actual Actual through Budget %of
Budget May May 31 Remaining Budget
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
#101 -STREET FUND
RECURRING ACTIVITY
Revenues
Telephone Utility Tax 1,521,000 1,259 368,937 (1,152,063) 24.26%
Motor Vehicle Fuel(Gas)Tax 2,046,700 90,209 557,664 (1,489,036) 27.25%
Multimodal Transportation 131,500 0 32,965 (98,535) 25.07%
Right-of-Way Maintenance Fee 70,000 5,181 6,870 (63,130) 9.81%
Investment Interest 17,000 0 130 (16,870) 0.77%
Miscellaneous Revenue 10,000 0 151 (9,849) 1.51%
Total Recurring Revenues 3,796,200 96,648 966,718 (2,829,482) 25.47%
Expenditures
Wages/Benefits/Payroll Taxes 1,059,613 51,893 418,712 640,901 39.52%
Supplies 146,050 7,654 73,286 72,764 50.18%
Services&Charges 2,426,467 244,336 492,721 1,933,746 20.31%
Snow Operations 543,776 40,613 477,559 66,217 87.82%
Intergovernmental Payments 922,000 58,908 191,670 730,330 20.79%
Transfers out-#501 (non-plow vehicle rental) 14,500 (2,833) (14,167) 28,667 -97.70%
Transfers out-#501 (plow replace) 48,500 4,042 20,208 28,292 41.67%
Total Recurring Expenditures 5,160,906 404,612 1,659,990 3,500,916 32.16%
Recurring Revenues Over(Under)
Recurring Expenditures (1,364,706) (307,964) (693,272) 671,434
NONRECURRING ACTIVITY
Revenues
Insurance Proceeds(traffic signal cabinet) 0 0 1,258 1,258 0.00%
Transfers in-#312 1,364,706 113,726 568,628 (796,079) 41.67%
Total Nonrecurring Revenues 1,364,706 113,726 569,885 (794,821) 41.76%
Expenditures
Spare Traffic Signal Equipment 0 0 0 0 0.00%
Trailer for Sidewalk Snow Removal 0 0 0 0 0.00%
Emergency Traffic Control Repairs 0 0 7,142 (7,142) 0.00%
Total Nonrecurring Expenditures 0 0 7,142 (7,142) 0.00%
Nonrecurring Revenues Over(Under)
Nonrecurring Expenditures 1,364,706 113,726 562,744 (801,962)
Excess(Deficit)of Total Revenues
Over(Under)Total Expenditures 0 (194,238) (130,529) (130,529)
Beginning fund balance 556,265 556,265
Ending fund balance 556,265 425,736
#103-PATHS&TRAILS
Revenues
Motor Vehicle Fuel(Gas)Tax 8,600 380 2,352 (6,248) 27.35%
Investment Interest 400 6 47 (353) 11.68%
Total revenues 9,000 386 2,399 (6,601) 26.65%
Expenditures
Capital Outlay 0 0 0 0 0.00%
Transfers out-#309(Appleway Trail-Sullivan to C 0 0 0 0 0.00%
Total expenditures 0 0 0 0 0.00%
Revenues over(under)expenditures 9,000 386 2,399 (6,601)
Beginning fund balance 14,115 14,115
Ending fund balance 23,115 16,514
Page 7
P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2020\2020 05 31
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA Budget Year 2020
Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures Elapsed= 41.67%
For the Five-Month Period Ended May 31,2020
2020
Actual Actual through Budget %of
Budget May May 31 Remaining Budget
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS-continued
#104-TOURISM FACILITIES HOTEL/MOTEL TAX FUND
Revenues
Tourism Facilities Hotel/Motel Tax 420,000 16,169 81,342 (338,658) 19.37%
Investment Interest 24,000 993 8,274 (15,726) 34.48%
Transfers in-#105 0 0 0 0 0.00%
Total revenues 444,000 17,162 89,616 (354,384) 20.18%
Expenditures
Capital Expenditures 0 0 0 0 0.00%
Total expenditures 0 0 0 0 0.00%
Revenues over(under)expenditures 444,000 17,162 89,616 (354,384)
Beginning fund balance 2,690,945 2,690,945
Ending fund balance 3,134,945 2,780,560
#105-HOTEL/MOTEL TAX FUND
Revenues
Hotel/Motel Tax 650,000 24,959 129,592 (520,408) 19.94%
Investment Interest 6,000 214 1,798 (4,202) 29.97%
Total revenues 656,000 25,173 131,390 (524,610) 20.03%
Expenditures
Transfers out-#001 30,000 0 0 30,000 0.00%
Transfers out-#104 0 0 0 0 0.00%
Tourism Promotion 795,000 20,458 50,802 744,198 6.39%
Total expenditures 825,000 20,458 50,802 774,198 6.16%
Revenues over(under)expenditures (169,000) 4,715 80,588 (1,298,807)
Beginning fund balance 518,240 518,240
Ending fund balance 349,240 598,828
#106-SOLID WASTE
Revenues
Solid Waste Administrative Fees 225,000 10,194 76,687 148,313 34.08%
Solid Waste Road Wear Fee 1,500,000 119,141 457,755 1,042,245 30.52%
Investment Interest 12,000 376 5,806 6,194 48.38%
Total revenues 1,737,000 129,712 540,248 1,196,752 31.10%
Expenditures
Transfers out-#311 1,500,000 0 0 1,500,000 0.00%
Education&Contract Administration 237,000 6,136 29,625 207,375 12.50%
Total expenditures 1,737,000 6,136 29,625 1,707,375 1.71%
Revenues over(under)expenditures 0 123,576 510,623 (510,623)
Beginning fund balance 540,182 540,182
Ending fund balance 540,182 1,050,805
#107-PEG FUND
Revenues
Comcast PEG Contribution 79,000 0 19,573 59,427 24.78%
Investment Interest 0 52 402 (402) 0.00%
Total revenues 79,000 52 19,975 59,025 25.28%
Expenditures
PEG Reimbursement-CMTV 39,500 0 0 39,500 0.00%
Capital Outlay 45,500 0 1,331 44,169 2.93%
Total expenditures 85,000 0 1,331 83,669 1.57%
Revenues over(under)expenditures (6,000) 52 18,644 (24,644)
Beginning fund balance 128,255 128,255
Ending fund balance 122,255 146,899
Page 8
P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2020\2020 05 31
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA Budget Year 2020
Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures Elapsed= 41.67%
For the Five-Month Period Ended May 31,2020
2020
Actual Actual through Budget %of
Budget May May 31 Remaining Budget
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS-continued
#108-AFFORDABLE&SUPPORTIVE HOUSING TAX FUND
Revenues
Affordable&Supportive Housing Tax 0 103 103 (103) 0.00%
Investment Interest 0 0 0 (0) 0.00%
Total revenues 0 103 103 (103) 0.00%
Expenditures
Affordable&Supportive Housing Program 0 0 0 0 0.00%
Total expenditures 0 0 0 0 0.00%
Revenues over(under)expenditures 0 103 103 (103)
Beginning fund balance 0 0
Ending fund balance 0 103
#120-CENTER PLACE OPERATING RESERVE FUND
Revenues
Investment Interest 0 0 0 0 0.00%
Transfers in 0 0 0 0 0.00%
Total revenues 0 0 0 0 0.00%
Expenditures
Operations 0 0 0 0 0.00%
Total expenditures 0 0 0 0 0.00%
Revenues over(under)expenditures 0 0 0 0
Beginning fund balance 300,000 300,000
Ending fund balance 300,000 300,000
#121 -SERVICE LEVEL STABILIZATION RESERVE FUND
Revenues
Investment Interest 0 0 0 0 0.00%
Transfers in 0 0 0 0 0.00%
Total revenues 0 0 0 0 0.00%
Expenditures
Operations 0 0 0 0 0.00%
Total expenditures 0 0 0 0 0.00%
Revenues over(under)expenditures 0 0 0 0
Beginning fund balance 5,500,000 5,500,000
Ending fund balance 5,500,000 5,500,000
#122-WINTER WEATHER RESERVE FUND
Revenues
Investment Interest 5,400 9 1,116 (4,284) 20.67%
Transfers in-#001 0 0 0 0 0.00%
Grant Proceeds-Windstorm Cleanup 0 0 0 0 0.00%
Subtotal revenues 5,400 9 1,116 (4,284) 20.67%
Expenditures
Snow removal expenses 500,000 0 0 500,000 0.00%
Transfers out-#101 0 0 0 0 0.00%
Total expenditures 500,000 0 0 500,000 0.00%
Revenues over(under)expenditures (494,600) 9 1,116 (504,284)
Beginning fund balance 23,336 23,336
Ending fund balance (471,264) 24,452
Page 9
P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2020\2020 05 31
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA Budget Year 2020
Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures Elapsed= 41.67%
For the Five-Month Period Ended May 31,2020
2020
Actual Actual through Budget %of
Budget May May 31 Remaining Budget
DEBT SERVICE FUNDS
#204-DEBT SERVICE FUND
Revenues
Spokane Public Facilities District 459,500 0 0 (459,500) 0.00%
Transfers in-#001 401,450 33,454 167,271 (234,179) 41.67%
Transfers in-#301 80,375 6,698 33,490 (46,885) 41.67%
Transfers in-#302 80,375 6,698 33,490 (46,885) 41.67%
Total revenues 1,021,700 46,850 234,250 (787,450) 22.93%
Expenditures
Debt Service Payments-CenterPlace 459,500 84,750 84,750 374,750 18.44%
Debt Service Payments-Roads 160,750 10,375 10,375 150,375 6.45%
Debt Service Payments-'16 LTGO Bond 401,450 118,225 118,225 283,225 29.45%
Total expenditures 1,021,700 213,350 213,350 808,350 20.88%
Revenues over(under)expenditures 0 (166,500) 20,900 (1,595,800)
Beginning fund balance 0 0
Ending fund balance 0 20,900
Page 10
P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2020\2020 05 31
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA Budget Year 2020
Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures Elapsed= 41.67%
For the Five-Month Period Ended May 31,2020
2020
Actual Actual through Budget %of
Budget May May 31 Remaining Budget
CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS
#301 -CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND
Revenues
REET 1 -Taxes 1,000,000 101,887 445,494 (554,506) 44.55%
Investment Interest 35,000 1,142 10,406 (24,594) 29.73%
Total revenues 1,035,000 103,028 455,901 (579,099) 44.05%
Expenditures
Transfers out-#204 80,375 6,698 33,490 46,885 41.67%
Transfers out-#303 1,089,148 0 (14,126) 1,103,274 -1.30%
Transfers out-#311 (pavement preservation) 772,639 0 0 772,639 0.00%
Transfers out-#314 49,041 0 70,741 (21,700) 144.25%
Total expenditures 1,991,203 6,698 90,104 1,901,099 4.53%
Revenues over(under)expenditures (956,203) 96,331 365,796 (2,480,198)
Beginning fund balance 2,798,194 2,798,194
Ending fund balance 1,841,991 3,163,990
#302-SPECIAL CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND
Revenues
REET 2-Taxes 1,000,000 101,887 445,494 (554,506) 44.55%
Investment Interest 35,000 1,729 15,786 (19,214) 45.10%
Total revenues 1,035,000 103,616 461,281 (573,719) 44.57%
Expenditures
Transfers out-#204 80,375 6,698 33,490 46,885 41.67%
Transfers out-#303 404,318 0 9,069 395,249 2.24%
Transfers out-#311 (pavement preservation) 772,638 0 0 772,638 0.00%
Total expenditures 1,257,331 6,698 42,559 1,214,772 3.38%
Revenues over(under)expenditures (222,331) 96,918 418,722 (1,788,492)
Beginning fund balance 4,391,870 4,391,870
Ending fund balance 4,169,539 4,810,592
Page 11
P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2020\2020 05 31
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA Budget Year 2020
Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures Elapsed= 41.67%
For the Five-Month Period Ended May 31,2020
2020
Actual Actual through Budget %of
Budget May May 31 Remaining Budget
CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS-continued
#303 STREET CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND
Revenues
Grant Proceeds 6,596,718 41,848 216,414 (6,380,304) 3.28%
Developer Contribution 110,499 4,173 4,173 (106,326) 3.78%
Transfers in-#301 1,089,148 0 (14,126) (1,103,274) -1.30%
Transfers in-#302 404,318 0 9,069 (395,249) 2.24%
Transfers in-#312 114,512 0 0 (114,512) 0.00%
Investment Interest 0 0 0 0 0.00%
Total revenues 8,315,195 46,021 215,529 (8,099,666) 2.59%
Expenditures
069 Park Road Reconstruction#2 285,164 0 0 285,164 0.00%
205 Sprague/Barker Intersection Improvement 195,499 15,935 44,188 151,311 22.60%
249 Sullivan&Wellesley Intersection 100,000 (9,375) 21,293 78,707 21.29%
259 North Sullivan ITS Project 810,232 12,682 57,004 753,228 7.04%
267 Mission SW-Bowdish to Union 19,852 0 134 19,718 0.67%
273 Barker/I-90 Interchange 90,000 8,800 67,730 22,270 75.26%
275 Barker Rd Widening-River to Euclid 3,729,143 8,461 75,791 3,653,352 2.03%
276 Barker Rd Widening-Euclid to Trent 0 0 24,252 (24,252) 0.00%
285 Indiana Ave Pres-Evergreen to Sullivan 300,000 56,244 56,446 243,554 18.82%
291 Adams Sidewalk Infill Project 444,645 6,101 19,381 425,264 4.36%
292 Mullan Preservation: Broadway-Mission 0 0 3,947 (3,947) 0.00%
293 2018 CSS Citywide Reflective Signal BP 99,000 72 926 98,074 0.94%
294 Citywide Reflective Post Panels 47,775 248 1,601 46,174 3.35%
295 Garland Avenue Extension 150,000 9,888 18,233 131,767 12.16%
299 Argonne Rd Concrete Pvmt Indiana to Mont 32,000 437 22,867 9,133 71.46%
300 Pines&Mission Intersection Improvements 516,000 23,666 27,467 488,533 5.32%
301 Park&Mission Intersection Improvements 0 5,974 8,589 (8,589) 0.00%
302 Ella Sidewalk: Broadway to Alki 371,760 72,756 117,026 254,734 31.48%
303 S.Conklin Road Sidewalk 124,125 1,445 13,929 110,196 11.22%
310 Sullivan Rd Overcrossing UP RR Deck Rep. 0 251 660 (660) 0.00%
313 Barker Road/Union Pacific Crossing 0 3,101 5,743 (5,743) 0.00%
Contingency 1,000,000 0 0 1,000,000 0.00%
Total expenditures 8,315,195 216,687 587,205 7,727,990 7.06%
Revenues over(under)expenditures 0 (170,666) (371,676) (15,827,655)
Beginning fund balance 67,402 67,402
Ending fund balance 67,402 (304,274)
Note: Work performed in the Street Capital Projects Fund for preservation projects is for items such as sidewalk upgrades that were bid
with the pavement preservation work.
Page 12
P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2020\2020 05 31
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA Budget Year 2020
Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures Elapsed= 41.67%
For the Five-Month Period Ended May 31,2020
2020
Actual Actual through Budget %of
Budget May May 31 Remaining Budget
CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS-continued
#309-PARKS CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND
Revenues
Grant Proceeds 2,500 0 389,144 386,644 15565.74%
Transfers in-#001 1,660,000 13,333 66,667 (1,593,333) 4.02%
Transfers in-#312 7,500 0 25,768 18,268 343.57%
Investment Interest 0 0 0 0 0.00%
Miscellaneous Revenues 0 0 (0) (0) 0.00%
Total revenues 1,670,000 13,333 481,578 (1,188,422) 28.84%
Expenditures
268 Appleway Trail-Evergreen to Sullivan 5,000 184,773 665,292 (660,292) 13305.85%
296 Browns Park 2019 Construction Improvements 5,000 0 (63,157) 68,157 -1263.15%
304 CenterPlace West Lawn Phase 2 1,500,000 219,400 437,903 1,062,097 29.19%
305 CenterPlace Roof Repair 0 6,034 27,597 (27,597) 0.00%
314 Balfour Park Frontage Improvements 0 567 869 (869) 0.00%
315 Brown's Park 2020 Improvements 0 147 438 (438) 0.00%
316 Balfour Park Improvements-Phase 1 0 1,271 1,902 (1,902) 0.00%
Total expenditures 1,510,000 412,191 1,070,845 439,155 70.92%
Revenues over(under)expenditures 160,000 (398,857) (589,266) (1,627,577)
Beginning fund balance 78,627 78,627
Ending fund balance 238,627 (510,639)
#310-CIVIC FACILITIES CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND
Revenues
Investment Interest 17,000 307 2,590 (14,410) 15.24%
Total revenues 17,000 307 2,590 (14,410) 15.24%
Expenditures
Transfers out 0 0 0 0 0.00%
Total expenditures 0 0 0 0 0.00%
Revenues over(under)expenditures 17,000 307 2,590 (14,410)
Beginning fund balance 855,985 855,985
Ending fund balance 872,985 858,575
Note: The fund balance includes$839,285.10 paid by the Library District for 2.82 acres at the Balfour Park site. If the District does not succeed
in getting a voted bond approved by October 2017 then the City may repurchase this land at the original sale price of$839,285.10.
Page 13
P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2020\2020 05 31
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA Budget Year 2020
Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures Elapsed= 41.67%
For the Five-Month Period Ended May 31,2020
2020
Actual Actual through Budget %of
Budget May May 31 Remaining Budget
CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS-continued
#311 -PAVEMENT PRESERVATION FUND
Revenues
Transfers in-#001 982,023 81,835 409,176 (572,847) 41.67%
Transfers in-#106 1,500,000 0 0 (1,500,000) 0.00%
Transfers in-#301 772,639 0 0 (772,639) 0.00%
Transfers in-#302 772,638 0 0 (772,638) 0.00%
Grant Proceeds 10,588 0 84,251 73,663 795.72%
Developer Contribution 0 0 0 0 0.00%
Investment Interest 0 1,573 6,555 6,555 0.00%
Total revenues 4,037,888 83,409 499,983 (3,537,905) 12.38%
Expenditures
Pre-Project GeoTech Services 50,000 0 0 50,000 0.00%
Pavement Preservation 4,217,523 0 0 4,217,523 0.00%
248 Sprague Street Pres-Sullivan to Corbin 0 0 (167) 167 0.00%
267 Mission SW-Bowdish to Union 0 288 354 (354) 0.00%
269 Evergreen-Mission Connector to Indiana 0 0 150 (150) 0.00%
284 Argonne Rd. Pres-Valleyway to Broadway 0 17 40 (40) 0.00%
285 Indiana Ave Pres-Evergreen to Sullivan 0 25,465 61,496 (61,496) 0.00%
287 University Pres-Dishman Mica to 16th 0 0 7,500 (7,500) 0.00%
290 2019 Local Access Streets(Midilome) 0 0 7,500 (7,500) 0.00%
292 Mullan Preservation: Broadway-Mission 0 1,304 1,431 (1,431) 0.00%
297 2019 SCWD#3 Street Preservation 0 0 (3,199) 3,199 0.00%
309 Local Access Streets: Barker Homes 0 4,196 30,064 (30,064) 0.00%
Total expenditures 4,267,523 31,271 105,170 4,162,353 2.46%
Revenues over(under)expenditures (229,635) 52,138 394,812 (7,700,258)
Beginning fund balance 4,425,201 4,425,201
Ending fund balance 4,195,566 4,820,013
#312-CAPITAL RESERVE FUND
Revenues
Transfers in-#001 0 0 0 0 0.00%
Transfers in-#310 0 0 0 0 0.00%
Investment Interest 100,000 4,623 43,607 (56,393) 43.61%
Total revenues 100,000 4,623 43,607 (56,393) 43.61%
Expenditures
Transfers out-#101 1,364,706 113,726 568,628 796,079 41.67%
Transfers out-#303 114,512 0 0 114,512 0.00%
Transfers out-#309 7,500 0 25,768 (18,268) 343.57%
Transfers out-#314 64,192 0 0 64,192 0.00%
Land Acquisitions 0 0 4,110 (4,110) 0.00%
Total expenditures 1,550,910 113,726 598,505 952,405 38.59%
Revenues over(under)expenditures (1,450,910) (109,102) (554,898) (1,008,797)
Beginning fund balance 12,936,816 12,936,816
Ending fund balance 11,485,906 12,381,918
Page 14
P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2020\2020 05 31
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA Budget Year 2020
Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures Elapsed= 41.67%
For the Five-Month Period Ended May 31,2020
2020
Actual Actual through Budget %of
Budget May May 31 Remaining Budget
CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS-continued
#313-CITY HALL CONSTRUCTION FUND
Revenues
Investment Interest 0 0 0 0 0.00%
Total revenues 0 0 0 0 0.00%
Expenditures
Transfers out-#312 0 0 0 0 0.00%
Total expenditures 0 0 0 0 0.00%
Revenues over(under)expenditures 0 0 0 0
Beginning fund balance 0 0
Ending fund balance 0 0
#314-RAILROAD GRADE SEPARATION PROJECTS FUND
Revenues
Grant Proceeds 12,808,751 0 1,033,775 (11,774,976) 8.07%
Investment Interest 0 0 10 10 0.00%
Transfers in-#301 49,041 0 70,741 21,700 144.25%
Transfers in-#312 64,192 0 0 (64,192) 0.00%
Total revenues 12,921,984 0 1,104,526 (11,817,458) 8.55%
Expenditures
143 Barker Rd/BNSF Grade Separation 11,475,292 198,543 1,609,139 9,866,153 14.02%
223 Pines Rd Underpass 1,562,500 12,493 43,928 1,518,572 2.81%
311 Sullivan Rd./SR 290 Interchange Project 0 1,165 1,335 (1,335) 0.00%
Total expenditures 13,037,792 212,202 1,654,402 11,383,390 12.69%
Revenues over(under)expenditures (115,808) (212,202) (549,876) (23,200,848)
Beginning fund balance 1,008,638 1,008,638
Ending fund balance 892,830 458,762
Page 15
P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2020\2020 05 31
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA Budget Year 2020
Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures Elapsed= 41.67%
For the Five-Month Period Ended May 31,2020
2020
Actual Actual through Budget %of
Budget May May 31 Remaining Budget
ENTERPRISE FUNDS
#402-STORMWATER FUND
RECURRING ACTIVITY
Revenues
Stormwater Management Fees 1,900,000 572,173 677,923 (1,222,077) 35.68%
Investment Interest 40,000 935 7,076 (32,924) 17.69%
Total Recurring Revenues 1,940,000 573,108 685,000 (1,255,000) 35.31%
Expenditures
Wages/Benefits/Payroll Taxes 519,582 33,332 169,211 350,371 32.57%
Supplies 14,750 2,355 34,404 (19,654) 233.25%
Services&Charges 1,298,153 106,295 208,094 1,090,059 16.03%
Intergovernmental Payments 37,500 0 19,536 17,964 52.10%
Vehicle Rentals-#501 14,000 1,167 5,833 8,167 41.67%
Total Recurring Expenditures 1,883,985 143,148 437,078 1,446,907 23.20%
Recurring Revenues Over(Under)
Recurring Expenditures 56,015 429,960 247,922 191,907
NONRECURRING ACTIVITY
Revenues
Grant Proceeds 59,828 0 304 (59,524) 0.51%
Total Nonrecurring Revenues 59,828 0 304 (59,524) 0.51%
Expenditures
Capital-various projects 500,000 0 9,285 490,715 1.86%
285 Indiana Ave Pres-Evergreen to Sullivan 0 126 162 (162) 0.00%
302 Ella Sidewalk: Broadway to Alki 0 13,933 17,029 (17,029) 0.00%
303 S.Conklin Road Sidewalk 0 869 994 (994) 0.00%
309 Local Access Streets: Barker Homes 0 0 1,585 (1,585) 0.00%
Watershed Studies 80,000 6,630 26,331 53,669 32.91%
Stormwater Comprehensive Plan 100,000 0 0 100,000 0.00%
Total Nonrecurring Expenditures 680,000 21,557 55,386 624,614 8.15%
Nonrecurring Revenues Over(Under)
Nonrecurring Expenditures (620,172) (21,557) (55,082) 565,090
Excess(Deficit)of Total Revenues
Over(Under)Total Expenditures (564,157) 408,402 192,839 756,996
Beginning working capital 2,180,773 2,180,773
Ending working capital 1,616,616 2,373,613
Note: Work performed in the Stormwater Fund for preservation projects is for storm water improvements that were bid
with the pavement preservation work.
#403-AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA
Revenues
Spokane County 460,000 0 0 (460,000) 0.00%
Grant Proceeds 349,000 0 0 (349,000) 0.00%
Investment Interest 20,000 746 6,374 (13,626) 31.87%
Total revenues 829,000 746 6,374 (822,626) 0.77%
Expenditures
Capital-various projects 500,000 21,991 39,045 460,955 7.81%
Total expenditures 500,000 21,991 39,045 460,955 7.81%
Revenues over(under)expenditures 329,000 (21,246) (32,671) (1,283,581)
Beginning working capital 2,118,299 2,118,299
Ending working capital 2,447,299 2,085,628
Page 16
P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2020\2020 05 31
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA Budget Year 2020
Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures Elapsed= 41.67%
For the Five-Month Period Ended May 31,2020
2020
Actual Actual through Budget %of
Budget May May 31 Remaining Budget
INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS
#501 -ER&R FUND
Revenues
Interfund vehicle lease-#001 28,000 2,333 11,667 (16,333) 41.67%
Interfund vehicle lease-#101 14,500 1,208 6,042 (8,458) 41.67%
Interfund vehicle lease-#101 (plow replace) 48,500 4,042 20,208 (28,292) 41.67%
Interfund vehicle lease-#402 14,000 1,167 5,833 (8,167) 41.67%
Transfers in-#001 (CenterPlace kitchen reserve) 36,600 3,050 15,250 (21,350) 41.67%
Transfers in-#001 (Code Enforcement Vehicle) 30,000 0 0 (30,000) 0.00%
Investment Interest 19,000 490 4,283 (14,717) 22.54%
Total revenues 190,600 12,290 63,283 (127,317) 33.20%
Expenditures
Wages/Benefits/Payroll Taxes 0 1,292 3,487 (3,487) 0.00%
Small tools&minor equipment 20,000 0 0 20,000 0.00%
Vehicle purchase 30,000 0 0 30,000 0.00%
Snow plow purchase 235,000 0 125,590 109,410 53.44%
Total expenditures 285,000 1,292 129,077 155,923 45.29%
Revenues over(under)expenditures (94,400) 10,998 (65,794) (283,241)
Beginning working capital 1,496,093 1,496,093
Ending working capital 1,401,693 1,430,299
#502-RISK MANAGEMENT FUND
Revenues
Investment Interest 0 0 0 0 0.00%
Transfers in-#001 410,000 34,167 170,833 (239,167) 41.67%
Total revenues 410,000 34,167 170,833 (239,167) 41.67%
Expenditures
Auto&Property Insurance 410,000 0 337,987 72,013 82.44%
Unemployment Claims 0 4,529 4,529 (4,529) 0.00%
Total expenditures 410,000 4,529 342,516 67,484 83.54%
Revenues over(under)expenditures 0 29,638 (171,682) (306,651)
Beginning working capital 276,004 276,004
Ending working capital 276,004 104,321
SUMMARY FOR ALL FUNDS
Total of Revenues for all Funds 90,026,301 7,914,101 22,915,411
Per Revenue Status Report 90,026,301 7,914,101 22,915,411
Difference - - -
Total of Expenditures for all Funds 89,998,731 5,305,091 23,359,657
Per Expenditure Status Report 89,998,731 5,305,091 23,359,657
Total Capital expenditures(included in
total expenditures) 28,285,510 910,830 3,653,734
Page 17
P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2020\2020 05 31
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 6/16/2020
Investment Report
For the Five-Month Period Ended May 31, 2020
NW Bank UMPQUA Total
LGIP" CD#2068 CD#0689 Investments
Beginning $ 67,595,830.29 $ 3,033,287.68 $ 2,101,932.42 $ 60,146,128.50
Deposits 1,990,539.73 0.00 0.00 1,990,539.73
Withdrawls 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Interest 28,643.34 0.00 0.00 28,643.34
Ending $ 69,615,013.36 $ 3,033,287.68 $ 2,101,932.42 $ 74,750,233.46
matures: 7/23/2020 11/15/2020
rate: 2.50% 1.75%
Earnings
Balance Current Period Year to date Budget
001 General Fund $ 37,181,348.76 $ 15,448.47 121,693.46 $ 700,000.00
101 Street Fund 0.00 0.00 130.46 17,000.00
103 Trails&Paths 14,328.58 5.90 46.71 400.00
104 Tourism Facilities Hotel/Motel 2,412,601.06 992.67 8,274.31 24,000.00
105 Hotel/Motel 519,583.51 213.78 1,798.08 6,000.00
106 Solid Waste Fund 914,727.67 376.37 5,805.76 12,000.00
107 PEG Fund 127,459.28 52.44 402.32 0.00
108 Affordable&Supportive Housing 88.99 0.04 0.04 0.00
120 CenterPlace Operating Reserve 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
121 Service Level Stabilization Reserve 5,500,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
122 Winter Weather Reserve 21,215.92 8.73 1,116.09 5,400.00
301 Capital Projects 2,774,348.15 1,141.52 10,406.19 35,000.00
302 Special Capital Projects 4,203,050.39 1,729.36 15,786.21 35,000.00
303 Street Capital Projects Fund 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
309 Parks Capital Project 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
310 Civic Buildings Capital Projects 744,957.42 306.52 2,589.99 17,000.00
311 Pavement Preservation 3,823,835.04 1,573.33 6,555.36 0.00
312 Capital Reserve Fund 11,236,763.25 4,623.41 43,607.04 100,000.00
313 City Hall Construction Fund 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
314 Railroad Grade Separation Projects 0.00 0.00 10.04 0.00
402 Stormwater Management 2,272,777.03 935.14 7,076.27 40,000.00
403 Aquifer Protection Fund 1,812,981.40 745.96 6,373.87 20,000.00
501 Equipment Rental &Replacement 1,190,167.01 489.70 4,282.71 19,000.00
502 Risk Management 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
$ 74,750,233.46 $ 28,643.34 $ 235,954.91 $ 1,030,800.00
"Local Government Investment Pool
Page 18
P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2020\2020 05 31
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 6/16/2020
Sales Tax Receipts
For the Five-Month Period Ended May 31,2020
Month Difference
Received 2019 2020 $
February 2,530,639.23 2,559,296.59 28,657.36 1.13%
March 1,861,849.29 2,015,206.15 153,356.86 8.24%
April 1,758,550.64 1,897,614.47 139,063.83 7.91%
May 2,208,350.09 1,847,551.89 (360,798.20) (16.34%)
8,359,389.25 8,319,669.10 (39,720.15) (0.48%)
June 2,200,987.91
July 2,333,320.72
August 2,530,196.67
September 2,405,945.26
October 2,504,583.31
November 2,422,514.22
December 2,341,644.57
January 2,284,009.79
27,382,591.70 8,319,669.10
Sales tax receipts reported here reflect remittances for general sales tax, criminal justice
sales tax and public safety tax.
The sales tax rate for retail sales transacted within the boundaries of the City of Spokane
Valley is 8.9%. The tax that is paid by a purchaser at the point of sale is remitted by the
vendor to the Washington State Department of Revenue who then remits the taxes back to
the various agencies that have imposed the tax. The allocation of the total 8.9%tax rate to
the agencies is as follows:
- State of Washington 6.50%
- City of Spokane Valley 0.85%
- Spokane County 0.15%
- Spokane Public Facilities District 0.10% *
- Criminal Justice 0.10%
- Public Safety 0.10% * 2.40% local tax
- Juvenile Jail 0.10% *
- Mental Health 0.10% *
- Law Enforcement Communications 0.10% *
- Spokane Transit Authority 0.80% *
8.90%
* Indicates voter approved sales taxes
In addition to the .85% reported above that the City receives, we also receive a portion of
the Criminal Justice and Public Safety sales taxes. The distribution of those taxes is
computed as follows:
Criminal Justice: The tax is assessed county-wide and of the total collected, the
State distributes 10%of the receipts to Spokane County, with the remainder
allocated on a per capita basis to the County and the cities within the County.
Public Safety: The tax is assessed county-wide and of the total collected, the
State distributes 60%of the receipts to Spokane County, with the remainder
allocated on a per capita basis to the cities within the County.
Page 19
P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Tax Revenue\Sales Tax\2020\sales tax collections 2020
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA
Sales Tax Collections-
For the years 2011 through 2020
2019 to 2020
Difference
2011 I 2012 I 2013 I 2014 I 2015 I 2016 I 2017 I 2018 I 2019 I 2020 $ %
January 1,460,548 1,589,887 1,671,269 1,677,887 1,732,299 1,863,225 1,992,273 2,078,412 2,240,908 2,253,852 12,944 0.58%
February 990,157 1,009,389 1,133,347 1,170,640 1,197,323 1,316,682 1,369,740 1,536,252 1,648,657 1,776,898 128,241 7.78%
March 1,015,762 1,067,733 1,148,486 1,201,991 1,235,252 1,378,300 1,389,644 1,564,282 1,549,275 1,687,355 138,080 8.91%
April 1,284,180 1,277,621 1,358,834 1,448,539 1,462,096 1,640,913 1,737,933 1,926,551 1,955,470 1,627,596 (327,874) (16.77%)
Collected to date 4,750,647 4,944,630 5,311,936 5,499,057 5,626,970 6,199,120 6,489,590 7,105,497 7,394,310 7,345,701 (48,609) (0.66%)
May 1,187,737 1,174,962 1,320,449 1,400,956 1,373,710 1,566,178 1,564,119 1,762,119 1,946,112 0
June 1,248,218 1,290,976 1,389,802 1,462,558 1,693,461 1,641,642 1,751,936 1,871,077 2,067,987 0
July 1,332,834 1,302,706 1,424,243 1,545,052 1,718,428 1,776,653 1,935,028 2,053,961 2,232,342 0
August 1,279,500 1,299,678 1,465,563 1,575,371 1,684,700 1,746,371 1,877,899 1,980,940 2,121,051 0
September 1,294,403 1,383,123 1,466,148 1,552,736 1,563,950 1,816,923 1,946,689 2,019,198 2,223,576 0
October 1,291,217 1,358,533 1,439,321 1,594,503 1,618,821 1,822,998 1,898,067 2,005,836 2,134,985 0
November 1,217,933 1,349,580 1,362,021 1,426,254 1,487,624 1,652,181 1,768,817 1,925,817 2,064,504 0
December 1,247,920 1,323,189 1,408,134 1,383,596 1,441,904 1,664,983 1,856,989 1,918,411 2,019,895 0
Total Collections 14,850,409 15,427,377 16,587,617 17,440,083 18,209,568 19,887,049 21,089,134 22,642,856 24,204,762 7,345,701
Budget Estimate 14,210,000 14,210,000 15,250,000 16,990,000 17,628,400 18,480,500 19,852,100 20,881,900 22,917,000 24,632,900
Actual over(under)budg 640,409 1,217,377 1,337,617 450,083 581,168 1,406,549 1,237,034 1,760,956 1,287,762 (17,287,199)
Total actual collections
as a%of total budget 104.51% 108.57% 108.77% 102.65% 103.30% 107.61% 106.23% 108.43% 105.62% n/a
%change in annual
total collected 5.34% 3.89% 7.52% 5.14% 4.41% 9.21% 6.04% 7.37% 6.90% n/a
%of budget collected
through April 33.43% 34.80% 34.83% 32.37% 31.92% 33.54% 32.69% 34.03% 32.27% 29.82%
%of actual total collected
through April 31.99% 32.05% 32.02% 31.53% 30.90% 31.17% 30.77% 31.38% 30.55% n/a
Chart Reflecting History of Collections through the Month of April
April
8,000,000
7,000,000
6,000,000
5,000,000 - April
4,000,000 Marc h
3,000,000 February
2,000,000 January
1,000,000
0
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Page 20
P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Tax Revenue\Lodging Tax\2020\105 hotel motel tax 2020
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 5/28/2020
Hotel/Motel Tax Receipts through- '
Actual for the years 2011 through 2020 _�
MAI- - 2019 to 2020
Difference
2011 I 2012 I 2013 I 2014 I 2015 I 2016 I 2017 I 2018 I 2019 I 2020 $ %
January 22,212 21,442 24,185 25,425 27,092 31,887 27,210 28,752 31,865 36,203 4,338 13.61%
February 22,792 21,549 25,975 26,014 27,111 27,773 26,795 28,878 32,821 31,035 (1,786) (5.44%)
March 24,611 25,655 27,739 29,384 32,998 34,330 31,601 31,906 40,076 37,395 (2,681) (6.69%)
April 38,230 52,130 40,979 48,246 50,455 52,551 52,242 57,664 59,117 24,959 (34,158) (57.78%)
Total Collections 107,846 120,776 118,878 129,069 137,656 146,541 137,848 147,200 163,879 129,592 (34,287) (20.92%)
May 33,791 37,478 40,560 41,123 44,283 50,230 50,112 51,777 53,596 0
June 41,403 43,971 47,850 52,618 56,975 55,060 60,637 62,048 73,721 0
July 49,312 52,819 56,157 61,514 61,809 65,007 69,337 71,865 84,628 0
August 57,452 57,229 63,816 70,384 72,697 73,700 76,972 79,368 91,637 0
September 58,908 64,299 70,794 76,100 74,051 70,305 80,173 79,661 97,531 0
October 39,028 43,699 43,836 45,604 49,880 55,660 56,631 61,826 77,932 0
November 37,339 39,301 42,542 39,600 42,376 46,393 47,090 52,868 59,252 0
December 32,523 30,432 34,238 33,256 41,510 33,478 37,180 40,363 41,675 0
Total Collections 457,603 490,004 518,672 549,267 581,237 596,374 615,980 646,976 743,851 129,592
Budget Estimate 480,000 430,000 490,000 530,000 550,000 580,000 580,000 580,000 600,000 650,000
Actual over(under)budg (22,397) 60,004 28,672 19,267 31,237 16,374 35,980 66,976 143,851 (520,408)
Total actual collections
as a%of total budget 95.33% 113.95% 105.85% 103.64% 105.68% 102.82% 106.20% 111.55% 123.98% n/a
%change in annual
total collected 2.02% 7.08% 5.85% 5.90% 5.82% 2.60% 3.29% 5.03% 14.97% n/a
%of budget collected
through _,<,, 22.47% 28.09% 24.26% 24.35% 25.03% 25.27% 23.77% 25.38% 27.31% 19.94%
%of actual total collected
through April 23.57% 24.65% 22.92% 23.50% 23.68% 24.57% 22.38% 22.75% 22.03% n/a
Chart Reflecting History of Collections through the Month of April
April
180,000
160,000
140,000 -
120,000
■April
100,000
•March
80,000
•February
60,000 ■January
40,000
20,000
0
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Page 21
P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Tax Revenue\REET\2020\301 and 302 REET for 2020
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 6/23/2020
1st and 2nd 1/4% REET Collections through April
Actual for the years 2011 through 2020rin
2019 to 2020
Difference
2011 I 2012 I 2013 I 2014 I 2015 I 2016 I 2017 I 2018 I 2019 I 2020 $ %
January 64,128 46,359 56,898 61,192 96,141 104,446 153,661 239,437 120,809 212,512 91,703 75.91%
February 36,443 56,115 155,226 67,049 103,508 83,583 124,514 146,892 199,209 242,927 43,718 21.95%
March 95,880 71,730 72,172 81,724 165,868 220,637 282,724 310,562 193,913 203,774 9,861 5.09%
April 79,681 86,537 90,377 105,448 236,521 205,654 169,060 218,842 347,528 197,928 (149,600) (43.05%)
Collected to date 276,133 260,740 374,673 315,412 602,038 614,321 729,959 915,733 861,459 857,141 (4,318) (0.50%)
May 124,692 111,627 116,165 198,870 165,748 192,806 202,734 646,397 263,171 0
June 81,579 124,976 139,112 106,676 347,421 284,897 248,768 277,424 465,044 0
July 79,629 101,049 128,921 208,199 217,375 248,899 449,654 302,941 327,636 0
August 129,472 106,517 117,150 172,536 202,525 231,200 472,420 261,626 300,312 0
September 68,020 63,517 174,070 152,323 179,849 178,046 187,348 259,492 335,824 0
October 61,396 238,095 117,806 123,505 128,833 253,038 207,895 584,792 225,216 0
November 74,753 104,886 78,324 172,227 129,870 186,434 229,800 263,115 319,161 0
December 65,077 74,300 75,429 117,682 157,919 164,180 278,995 288,912 235,726 0
Total distributed by Spokane County 960,751 1,185,707 1,321,650 1,567,429 2,131,578 2,353,822 3,007,573 3,800,432 3,333,549 857,141
Budget estimate 780,000 875,000 975,000 1,100,000 1,400,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 3,000,000 2,800,000 2,000,000
Actual over(under)budget 180,751 310,707 346,650 467,429 731,578 353,822 1,007,573 800,432 533,549 (1,142,859)
Total actual collections
as a%of total budget 123.17% 135.51% 135.55% 142.49% 152.26% 117.69% 150.38% 126.68% 119.06% n/a
%change in annual
total collected (0.16%) 23.41% 11.47% 18.60% 35.99% 10.43% 27.77% 26.36% (12.28%) n/a
%of budget collected
through April 35.40% 29.80% 38.43% 28.67% 43.00% 30.72% 36.50% 30.52% 30.77% 42.86%
%of actual total collected
through April 28.74% 21.99% 28.35% 20.12% 28.24% 26.10% 24.27% 24.10% 25.84% n/a
Chart Reflecting History of Collections through the Month of April
April
1,000,000
900,000 -
800,000 -
700,000
600,000 •April
500,000 •March
400,000 •February
300,000 ■January
200,000
100,000
0
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Page 22
P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Debt Capacity\2020\debt capacity 2020
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 4/1/2020
Debt Capacity
2019 Assessed Value for 2020 Property Taxes 10,200,357,539
Maximum Outstanding Remaining
Debt as of Debt ok
Capacity 12/31/2018 Capacity Utilized
Voted(UTGO) 1.00%of assessed value 102,003,575 0 102,003,575 0.00%
Nonvoted(LTGO) 1.50%of assessed value 153,005,363 11,715,000 141,290,363 7.66%
Voted park 2.50%of assessed value 255,008,938 0 255,008,938 0.00%
Voted utility 2.50%of assessed value 255,008,938 0 255,008,938 0.00%
765,026,814 11,715,000 753,311,814 1.53%
2014 LTGO Bonds
Road& LTGO Bonds
Period Street 2016 LTGO Grand
Ending CenterPlace Improvements Total Bonds Total
12/1/2014 225,000 135,000 360,00 0 360,000
Bonds 12/1/2015 175,000 125,000 300,00 0 300,000
Repaid 12/1/2016 185,000 130,000 315,000 75,000 390,000
12/1/2017 190,000 130,000 320,000 150,000 470,000
12/1/2018 230,000 135,000 365,000 155,000 520,000
L12/1/2019 255,000 140,000 395,000 160,000 555,000
1,260,000 795,000 2,055,000 540,000 2,595,000
12/1/2020 290,000 140,000 430,000 165,000 595,000
12/1/2021 320,000 145,000 465,000 170,000 635,000
12/1/2022 350,000 150,000 500,000 175,000 675,000
12/1/2023 390,000 155,000 545,000 180,000 725,000
12/1/2024 430,000 0 430,000 185,000 615,000
12/1/2025 465,000 0 465,000 195,000 660,000
12/1/2026 505,000 0 505,000 +00,000 705,000
12/1/2027 395,000 0 395,000 '05,000 600,000
12/1/2028 300,000 0 300,000 15,000 515,000
12/1/2029 245,000 0 245,000 2'0,000 465,000
12/1/2030 225,000 0 225,000 2. ,000 450,000
Bonds 12/1/2031 180,000 0 180,000 23,,000 415,000
Remaining 12/1/2032 130,000 0 130,000 246,000 370,000
12/1/2033 165,000 0 165,000 250,000 415,000
12/1/2034 0 0 0 260,100 260,000
12/1/2035 0 0 0 270,600 270,000
12/1/2036 0 0 0 280,010 280,000
12/1/2037 0 0 0 290,060 290,000
12/1/2038 0 0 0 305,006 305,000
12/1/2039 0 0 0 315,001 315,000
12/1/2040 0 0 0 330,000 330,000
12/1/2041 0 0 0 340,000 340,000
12/1/2042 0 0 0 355,000 355,000
12/1/2043 0 0 0 365,000 365,000
12/1/2044 0 0 0 375,000 375,000
12/1/2045 0 0 0 390,000 390,000
4,390,000 590,000 4,980,000 6,735,000 11,715,000
5,650,000 1,385,000 7,035,000 7,275,000 14,310,000
Page 23
P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Tax Revenue\MVFT\2020\motor vehicle fuel tax collections 2020
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA
Motor Fuel(Gas)Tax Collections- • ,)
For the years 2011 through 2020 I
2019 to 2020
Difference
2011 I 2012 I 2013 I 2014 I 2015 I 2016 I 2017 I 2018 I 2019 I 2020 $ %
January 154,792 159,607 146,145 152,906 152,598 163,918 150,654 162,359 148,530 152,686 4,156 2.80%
February 146,353 135,208 145,998 148,118 145,455 163,037 164,807 175,936 181,823 170,461 (11,362) (6.25%)
March 141,849 144,297 135,695 131,247 140,999 145,537 138,205 139,826 131,009 146,280 15,271 11.66%
April 165,019 153,546 156,529 156,269 157,994 167,304 168,000 168,796 144,080 90,589 (53,491) (37.13%)
Collected to date 608,013 592,658 584,367 588,540 597,046 639,796 621,666 646,917 605,442 560,016 (45,426) (7.50%)
May 154,700 144,670 151,595 156,850 156,259 171,829 174,211 193,986 185,669 0
June 158,351 159,827 167,479 161,965 164,872 157,737 174,838 144,308 175,985 0
July 165,398 160,565 155,348 157,805 168,205 177,427 177,019 194,267 169,733 0
August 153,361 164,050 173,983 172,308 186,277 177,567 195,780 205,438 195,107 0
September 173,820 171,651 195,397 173,299 174,505 194,640 184,342 180,874 180,605 0
October 158,889 153,022 133,441 160,539 161,520 166,369 163,780 158,062 162,187 0
November 160,461 162,324 164,303 165,871 181,771 176,178 194,814 199,282 196,240 0
December 124,714 138,223 142,140 141,298 153,338 152,787 154,298 148,960 155,728 0
Total Collections 1,857,707 1,846,990 1,868,053 1,878,475 1,943,793 2,014,330 2,040,748 2,072,094 2,026,696 560,016
Budget Estimate 1,875,000 1,905,800 1,868,900 1,866,400 1,867,700 2,013,400 2,048,900 2,061,100 2,039,500 2,055,300
Actual over(under)budg (17,293) (58,810) (847) 12,075 76,093 930 (8,152) 10,994 (12,804) (1,495,284)
Total actual collections
as a%of total budget 99.08% 96.91% 99.95% 100.65% 104.07% 100.05% 99.60% 100.53% 99.37% n/a
%change in annual
total collected 204.85% (0.58%) 1.14% 0.56% 3.48% 3.63% 1.31% 1.54% (2.19%) n/a
%of budget collected
through 32.43% 31.10% 31.27% 31.53% 31.97% 31.78% 30.34% 31.39% 29.69% 27.25%
%of actual total collected
through April 32.73% 32.09% 31.28% 31.33% 30.72% 31.76% 30.46% 31.22% 29.87% n/a
Chart Reflecting History of Collections through the Month of April
April
700,000
600,000
500,000 ■
400,000 April
■ March
300,000 ■ February
200,000 'January
100,000 ■
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Page 24
P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Tax Revenue\Telephone Tax\2020\telephone utility tax collections 2020
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 6/23/2020
Telephone Utility Tax Collections it
-
For the years 2011 through 2020
2019 to 2020
Difference
2011 I 2012 I 2013 I 2014 I 2015 I 2016 I 2017 I 2018 I 2019 I 2020 $ %
January 241,357 193,818 217,478 210,777 177,948 182,167 162,734 130,196 136,615 123,292 (13,323) (9.75%)
February 230,366 261,074 216,552 205,953 212,845 173,971 163,300 164,060 132,538 122,448 (10,090) (7.61%)
March 245,539 234,113 223,884 208,206 174,738 177,209 162,536 158,416 138,727 121,938 (16,789) (12.10%)
April 238,561 229,565 214,618 206,038 214,431 171,770 157,285 146,519 126,455 120,016 (6,439) (5.09%)
Collected to date 955,823 918,570 872,532 830,974 779,962 705,117 645,855 599,191 534,335 487,694 (46,641) (8.73%)
May 236,985 227,469 129,270 210,010 187,856 174,512 161,506 149,434 135,704 0
June 239,013 234,542 293,668 210,289 187,412 170,450 156,023 150,780 129,602 0
July 244,191 226,118 213,078 205,651 190,984 174,405 157,502 147,281 130,723 0
August 349,669 228,789 211,929 205,645 185,172 171,909 150,644 148,158 127,303 0
September 241,476 227,042 210,602 199,193 183,351 170,476 155,977 141,290 128,018 0
October 237,111 225,735 205,559 183,767 183,739 166,784 153,075 142,925 127,214 0
November 240,246 225,319 212,947 213,454 175,235 166,823 151,208 139,209 125,027 0
December 236,449 221,883 213,097 202,077 183,472 168,832 161,115 140,102 126,226 0
Total Collections 2,980,963 2,735,467 2,562,682 2,461,060 2,257,183 2,069,308 1,892,905 1,758,370 1,564,152 487,694
Budget Estimate 3,000,000 3,000,000 2,900,000 2,750,000 2,565,100 2,340,000 2,000,000 1,900,000 1,600,000 1,521,000
Actual over(under)budg (19,037) (264,533) (337,318) (288,940) (307,917) (270,692) (107,095) (141,630) (35,848) (1,033,306)
Total actual collections
as a%of total budget 99.37% 91.18% 88.37% 89.49% 88.00% 88.43% 94.65% 92.55% 97.76% n/a
%change in annual
total collected (0.17%) (8.24%) (6.32%) (3.97%) (8.28%) (8.32%) (8.52%) (7.11%) (11.05%) n/a
%of budget collected
through ':. " 31.86% 30.62% 30.09% 30.22% 30.41% 30.13% 32.29% 31.54% 33.40% 32.06%
%of actual total collected
through April 32.06% 33.58% 34.05% 33.76% 34.55% 34.08% 34.12% 34.08% 34.16% n/a
Chart Reflecting History of Collections through the Month of April
April •April
1,200,000 •March
1,000,000 •February
■January
800,000 L
600,000
400,000
200,000
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Page 25
Mark I'Vciner Ozzie Knezor'icli
Chief of Police Sheriff
9 0 LIc , Spokane Valley Police Department
Accredited Since 2011
4
%.63,0„,„ f
-..- --_ v Services provided in partnership with 4A.c°
..
IIIA, opal.r,,i the Spokane County Sheriff's Office and the Community,
Dedicated to Your Safety.
TO: Mark Calhoun, City Manager
FROM: Mark Werner, Chief of Police
DATE: June 17,2020
RE: Monthly Report April-May 2020
ADMINISTRATIVE:
Due to the regional shutdown resulting from the COVID-19 virus outbreak, activities were greatly
reduced during the April-May time period. As a result, we've combined these two months into one
report.
In late April, Sheriff Knezovich welcomed three new deputies:
Matthew Manza—Is 23-years-old and is single. He grew up in Spokane Valley, and attended Eastern
Washington University where he earned a Bachelor's Degree in Accounting. He has worked at the
YMCA Spokane Valley Branch for several years as a Lead Life Guard, Pool Manager, and Manager
on Duty. When asked why he wanted to work at the Sheriff's Office Matthew stated, "I am interested
in pursuing a career in law enforcement because I have a passion for helping people in my
community."
Joshua Sager—Is 22-years-old and married. Joshua grew up in Newman Lake and graduated from
East Valley High School. He worked for R&R Heating and Air Conditioning for three years before
joining the Sheriff's Office. He enjoys fishing and hunting. Joshua also attended Inland Helicopters
School and earned his Private Pilot's License-Rotorcraft.
Nicole Schmidt — Is 22-years-old and is single. Nicole is from Kelso, WA and attended Eastern
Washington University where she graduated with honors and earned a Bachelor's Degree in
Communication Studies and Psychology. Nicole has been a Volunteer Firefighter/EMT with Airway
Heights Fire Department for four years. Prior to joining the Sheriff's Office, Nicole worked at Soar
Behavioral Services as a Behavioral Technician. During the hiring process, Nicole stated, "I am a
driven individual who strides to work hard and honor others."
Page 1
In mid-May, Sheriff Knezovich also welcomed two more new deputies to the department:
Jeffrey Burch —Is 23-years old and married; they have two dogs. He is originally from Cashmere,
WA. Jeff enjoys fishing, hunting, shooting, and snowboarding. Before joining the Sheriff's Office,
Jeff worked for the Washington State Department of Corrections at the Airway Heights Prison as a
Corrections Officer.
Parker Perry—Is 22-years old and is engaged. Parker was born and raised in Oakesdale,WA. Parker
recently graduated from Carroll College in Montana with a Bachelor's Degree in Business
Administration. He was also a member of the ROTC program in college and was recently
commissioned into the Washington Army National Guard. Parker enjoys woodworking.
Chief Werner participated in a number of meetings, such as the SRED Board Meetings, in late April
through May, which were held on-line instead of in-person due to COVID-19. An in-person meeting
was held at the Sheriff's Training Center by command staff to discuss Phase 2 Strategic Planning. The
majority of other meetings were cancelled.
SHERIFF'S COMMUNITY ORIENTED POLICING EFFORT (SCOPE):
In the month of April-May, S.C.O.P.E. participated in:
• East Valley Community Coalition Mtg. • Provided bicycle helmets to Broadway and
Underage Drinking/Drug Prevention McDonald Elementary students. These
• S.C.O.P.E. helped with Food Distribution for helmets are provided to S.C.O.P.E. from the
Central Valley SD Students during COVED- City of Spokane Valley.
19 • S.C.O.P.E. provided Citizen-On-Patrol for
• S.C.O.P.E. participated in Drive-By Parade businesses and construction sites that had
for citizen birthday. been closed down by the Governor's Stay-
• Edgdcliff S.C.O.P.E. cleaned up garbage At-Home order. This was because of the
dumped at a Disabled Vets home in Edgecliff increase of break-ins to these properties.
area.
April-May 2020 Volunteers Hours per Station
*Includes estimated volunteer service hours that are provided in the City of Spokane Valley. These
two locations cover both Spokane Valley and the unincorporated portion of the county.
Location #Volunteers Admin Hours L.E. Hours Total Hours
Central Valley 2 17 0 17
East Valley* 12 27.5 118.5 146
Edgecliff 10 55.5 12 67.5
Trentwood 10 57.5 63 120.5
University 11 181.5 9.5 191
West Valley* 13 76 18 94
TOTALS 58 415 221 636
Volunteer Value ($31.72 per hour) $20,173.92 for April-May 2020
Page 2
The SCOPE Latent Fingerprint Team closed operations mid-month in March; they have not resumed
this service.
S.C.O.P.E. Incident Response Team (SIRT) volunteers contributed 29 on-scene hours (including
travel time) in April, responding to crime scenes, motor vehicle accidents and providing traffic
control; 24 hours were for incidents in Spokane Valley. There were 47 on-scene hours in May with 24
hours for incidents in Spokane Valley. There were no special events in April or May. Total volunteer
hours contributed by SIRT,including training,stand-by,response and special events is 1,473 for April
and 588 for May; total for 2020 is 5,470.
Abandoned Vehicles
Mar 2020 Apr 2020 May 2020
Tagged for Impounding 14 0 15
Cited/Towed 0 0 5
Hulks Processed 10 0 22
Total Vehicles Processed 58 0 72
Yearly Total of Vehicles Processed 300 300 372
SCOPE DISABLED PARKING ACTIVITY REPORT
_ City of Spokane Valley
# of # of Hrs. # of # of # of Non-
Vol. Disabled Warnings Disabled
Infractions Issued Infractions Issued
Issued
January 4 22.5 2 25 0
February 4 18.5 3 30 0
March 2 6 0 8 0
April 0 0 0 0 0
May 0 0 0 0 0
YTD Total 10 47 5 63 0
Spokane County
# of # of Hrs. #of #of # of Non-
Vol. Disabled Warnings Disabled
Infractions Issued Infractions Issued
Issued
January 2 16.4 4 10 0
February 3 12.5 1 10 0
March 2 9 0 4 0
April 0 0 0 0 0
May 0 0 0 0 0
i YTD Total 7 37.9 5 24 0
Page 3
OPERATIONS:
Wanted Driver Rams Deputy's Patrol Vehicle in a Wildly Reckless Attempt to Flee: Spokane
Valley Deputies arrested the driver of a vehicle who rammed a patrol vehicle while actively
trying to flee. His wildly reckless actions risked his safety as well as his passengers, the public,
and the deputies involved. The driver was charged with multiple new charges stemming from
this incident and an active felony warrant for his arrest. The passenger also had an active felony
warrant for his arrest and was booked into jail. A motorcyclist, who was not initially involved,
was injured (broken leg) at the conclusion of the pursuit. He was found to be in possession of a
controlled substance and is being investigated for operating a motor vehicle under the influence
of drugs/alcohol. In late May, at approximately 2:20 a.m., a Spokane Valley Deputy attempted to
stop a reckless vehicle, a 2005 Chevrolet Malibu, and possibly impaired driver in the area of 5th and
Park Rd. in Spokane Valley. The 28-year-old male driver began to flee instead of pulling over as
required by law. The suspect continued his aggressive, recklessly determined, attempt to avoid
capture. Several marked patrol cars were involved during this incident as it made its way through
parking lots, around businesses, and traveled the wrong way on Sprague. Shortly after, the pursuit
was terminated by the sergeant, due to the danger posed by the suspect's actions. Deputies fanned
out to major intersections in the area intending to successfully deploy spike strips to stop the suspect's
ability to travel at high speeds. Near the intersection of Broadway and University, the suspect was
observed traveling west on Broadway at a high rate of speed with the vehicle's lights turned off The
suspect appeared to swerve toward the fully-marked patrol car before running over a set of deployed
spike strips while maintaining his high speed. As the male suspect continued to drive recklessly
without care for anyone in the area, several PIT(Pursuit Intervention Technique) attempts were made,
but they were unsuccessful. During one attempt, the suspect gripped the steering wheel, smiled, and
accelerated rapidly toward the deputy, appearing to ram his patrol car intentionally. During another
attempt, he drove into the front of a patrol car as the deputy tried to block his escape route and pushed
through, continuing to flee. Now eastbound on Trent, continuing to demonstrate his determination to
flee at any cost despite sparks flying up from the metal of wheels grinding on the roadway, deputies,
with their lights and sirens activated, again tried to conduct a PIT maneuver at the intersection of Park
and Trent. The deputy moved his patrol car into position on the passenger's side of the suspect's car
to conduct the PIT and the suspect's car spun into the intersection. Simultaneously,a motorcycle rider
stopped facing west on Trent in the turn lane to go south on Park, failed to clear the intersection as the
emergency vehicles approached and was struck. The male suspect regained control of his vehicle,
drove wildly through the parking lot on the northeast, and turned back toward the intersection and the
injured rider. Assisting deputies positioned their vehicles between the injured rider and the suspect's
accelerating vehicle. The male suspect and two deputies collided,ending the pursuit. Traffic Collision
Technicians were called to the scene to investigate. The initial investigation indicated the deputy's
patrol car struck the leg of the motorcycle rider who failed to clear the intersection. The rider was
transported to the hospital for a possible broken leg. Investigators also believe the motorcyclist was
impaired at the time of the incident, and they obtained a warrant for a blood draw for
testing. Additionally, a substance believed to be methamphetamine was found on his person. The
male suspect and his 26-year-old male passenger were taken into custody without further incident.
After being advised of his rights,the male suspect/driver said he ran because he got scared and wanted
to see his girlfriend one more time. He said he saw a patrol car in the intersection as they approached,
Page 4
but he did not see a motorcycle. He admitted to using meth about an hour before the incident began.
The passenger stated he told the suspect/driver multiple times to stop and that he wanted to get out
because he was afraid for his life,but the suspect wouldn't pull over. The male suspect was transported
and booked into the Spokane County Jail for Attempting to Elude a Police Vehicle,Assault 2nd Degree,
Vehicular Assault, Reckless Driving,Driving while Suspended, Unlawful Imprisonment and a felony
Washington State Department of Corrections warrant. The male passenger was transported and
booked into the Spokane County Jail for Possession of a Controlled Substance-Heroin and a felony
Washington State Department of Corrections warrant. The motorcycle rider has not been charged at
this time, but faces Possession of a Controlled Substance and possible DUI charges dependent on the
results of the blood sample.
With Property Crimes Spiking, Sheriff Knezovich Implements a Property Crime Task Force to
Hold Criminals Responsible: Spokane County Sheriff Ozzie Knezovich announced the
formation of a Property Crimes Task Force with the primary goal of identifying and arresting
the criminals who are preying on our community in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. In
late April, after seeing crime trends, especially property crimes in all areas of Spokane County and
Spokane Valley, increase dramatically, Sheriff Knezovich formed a Property Crime Task Force to
specifically address this criminal activity. Sheriff Knezovich stated. "We will not allow criminals to
prey on the citizens of Spokane County. Right now, we all are facing unprecedented health and
economic adversity and,in some cases, a potential disaster. We cannot stand by while criminals make
the damage worse by victimizing our community." The latest property crimes statistics year to date,
show the three most significant increases in Commercial Burglary up 162%, Robbery up 68%, and
Residential Burglary up 42%. The Property Crimes Task Force's objective,in conjunction with patrol
deputies, detectives, and crime analysts is to target those committing crimes while joining with the
citizens of Spokane County as partners to gather information to address the growing crime
problem. "We need our citizens to join our efforts, not only as our eyes and ears but by limiting the
opportunities that make it easier for criminals to commit crimes," said Sheriff Knezovich. "We need
to watch out for one another, make sure our garages are closed, our residences are secured and well
lit, and our valuables are safe. Businesses should do the same to help us protect our community."
Information and data reported from our community and patrol deputies will be combined by our crime
analysts and used to target times, locations, and persons committing property crimes in our
region. Based on this information, our agency will focus resources strategically to combat this
criminal activity while educating neighborhoods, bringing awareness of the problem, and reducing
opportunities for the criminals to exploit. We encourage everyone to join us in this effort and unite
with your neighbors to report any suspicious or criminal activity immediately, while keeping your
valuables safe and your homes and garages secured. As a community,we will identify and hold these
criminals accountable for preying on our neighborhoods during these trying and uncertain times.
Cart Tagging Project in County neighborhoods - Spokane County's Solid Waste Section has a
community education project they are implementing currently and through the summer. They
received a grant for recycling education and outreach that consists of hiring workers to staple cart tags
(small informational flyers) onto the handles of recycling carts. There are a few small teams of hired
workers outfitted with safety vests (teams are 2-3 people) walking and driving in neighborhoods with
residential recycling service. They are hoping that dispatch never receives a call regarding the project,
but in case any resident sees suspicious activity in their neighborhood and it fits the bill of cart taggers
Page 5
in neon safety vests doing some recycling education and outreach, they want citizens to be aware of
the program. There is a FAQ document about the grant-funded project that can be found at the
following link: https://mv.spokanecity.org/news/stories/2020/05/27/recycling-study-takes-to-the-streets/
We encourage residents who have operational surveillance cameras
outside their home to go to the Sheriff's website and register their
home and video cameras. Thank you.
https://w-ww.s e okanec county.or•/1 0 8 0/S henff
•
o •
14)
'STIP
Video
Identification
Program
CLICK HERE
to volunlarlly loin
the VIP propswn
air OS a
0 C K
LOCK OBSERVE CARS SHOULD KEEP GARAGE
ITEMS IN AND REPORT NEVER RUN DOORS CLOSED
YOUR TRUNK UNATTENDED
Page 6
Spokane County Sheriffs Office ,eCO , 7
Regional Intelligence Group ts
Spokane Valley Districts # 'i
IBR Classification: Burglary RIG 9
90I !
• I �
80 I I
70
I
60
50 1 4
iv .. ________g_____u _.....2017
40 I -2018
301411112'—'\ f 2019
Calendar 2020
20
•
10
0
>- Y x Y w } F- cc d' cc cc
cc a u ¢ z --' v, w w w w
Q Q K
D CO CO cO CO
z cr 2 w E' w w
m Q H u > J
w a 0 0
u_ w z p
N
Year
Month Count 2017 2018 2019 Calendar 2020
January 55 51 33 40
February 53 26 20 56
March 42 33 37 53
April 49 36 35 70
May 47 34 57 67
June 59 29 38
July 51 44 48
August 56 51 57
September 78 38 _ 50^
October 37 48 46
November 32 49 40
December 33 47 40
Grand Total 592 486 501 286
* IBR Offense: Burglary/Breaking&Entering 220 Produced: 6/17/2020
For Law Enforcement Use Only
This document is confidential and may not be further disseminated or released to any unauthorized persons pursuant to RCW 42.56.420
Spokane County Sheriff's Office4,,,o°u -0= .
Regional Intelligence Group o
Spokane Valley Districts v<fi
IBR Classification: Murder NonNeg Manslaughter RIG 9
1.2 1
1 Li • •
0.8 I
0.6 —4-2017
—iii—2018
0.4 ,
—A—2019
I
Calendar 2020
0.2
1
0 1 1
r r = — > u >- F— w ce ce uc
K 're U d Q Z _1 01 w W w u
D m m CO 03
D : ¢ _ 2 o 7 7
Z CC 7 = F- u, u
au, Q F— U > U
Lu a_ O p Lu
,i uz o
0
Year
Month Count 2017 2018 2019 Calendar 2020
January
_February 1
March
April
May 1
June 1
July 1
August
September
_October
November 1
December 1
Grand Total 2 1 1 2
*IBR Offense; Murder/Non-Negligent Manslaughter 09A Produced: 6/17/2020
For Law Enforcement Use Only
This document is confidential and may not be further disseminated or released to any unauthorized persons pursuant to RCW 42.56.420
Spokane County Sheriff's OfficecoUNr)..4�
Regional Intelligence Group ,
r. ,,-,
Spokane Valley Districts <; fi'�
IBR Classification: Identity Theft I?,iG 9
500 I
450
400
350 ,I
1 I
300
250 i —ii-2017
--a—2018
200
—k—•2019
150 Calendar 2020
100
50
0
>- y 2 J r w } I— CC TI Ua Z J vs w x a 2 D m 2 3 w
N
Year
Month Count 2017 2018 2019 Calendar 2020
January 9 20 19 17
February 24 16 10 16
March 22 13, 13 12
April 16 22 19 17
May 32 21 13 441
June 19 17 5
July 23 14 12
August 13 14 8
September 17 13 14
October 15 21 17
November 19 23 12
December 25 16 7
Grand Total 234 210 149 503
*lBR Offense: Identity Theft 26F Produced: 6/17/2020
For Law Enforcement Use Only
This document is confidential and may not be further disseminated or released to any unauthorized persons pursuant to RCW 42.56.420
Spokane County Sheriff's OfficeCoUNn-
Regional Intelligence Group p _ , '
mi
Spokane Valley Districts ',',
IBR Classification: Fraud 4r JG 9 •
90
80
70
60 , /*fp* 1441T-01 .411r
..iir ,,, 1
50
I . 1 —6-2017
40 -- -2018
Y —ii-2019
30
I Calendar 2020
20
j
10
I
0 1
)- >- a - )- w >- H cc cc cc cc
cc cc U s Q z 0 w w w w
q d CCD a m m m m
m Q d 1.7 o 2 2
Z r 2 0w I-
<
w w
-, w < Q 0 7 w
O
u wZ O
vl
Year
Month Count 2017 2018 2019 Calendar 2020
January 26 69 _ 65 70
February 36 46 32 58
March 37 59 63 49
April 43 55 57 61
May 53 67 56 85
June 57 65 50
July 61 65 65
August 53 62 65
September 66 49 55
October 64 60 _ 75
November 54 56 68
December 43 60 49'
Grand Total 593 713 700 323
* IBR Offense: Fraud-Credit Card/ATM 26B, Fraud-False
Pretenses/Swindling/Con Games 26A,&Fraud-Impersonation 26C Produced: 6/17/2020
For Law Enforcement Use Only
This document is confidential and may not be further disseminated or released to any unauthorized persons pursuant to RCW 42.56420
Spokane County Sheriff's Office ,COU 'si
Regional Intelligence Group 43. , L.
la
Spokane Valley Districts ' 4 ,
IBR Classification: DUI RIG 9
45
I
40
35
I
30
41(
Il
25lie
��411Oi\l114IlliPr —�2017
4
20 --I--2018
—�2019
15
Calendar 2020
10 I
5
0
>- - = J } W >- 1- 2' cc OC cc
_ cc (J K 4 Z J N w W iii w
Q < a D 7 m co m m
z w 2 D W I— W W
Q co < H U > U
W d 0 O W
LL WZ 0
h
Year
Month Count 2017 2018 2019 Calendar 2020
January 22 21 32 25
February 26 18 21 28
March 33 39 21 9
April 18 13 27 18
May 19 33 18 16
June 28 23 27
July 26 15 25
August 24 28 23
September 19 37 40
October 24 33 29
November 18 31 35
December 20 22 21
Grand Total 277 313 319 96
* 1BR Offense:DUI 900 Produced: 6/17/2020
For Law Enforcement Use Only
This document is confidential and may not be further disseminated or released to any unauthorized persons pursuant to RCW 42.56.420
Spokane County Sheriff's OfficecOUNrs,
Regional Intelligence Group e ' r -:-.e.....,,-). - r
., _l __ ;Al
Spokane Valley Districts - f`.
IBR Classification: Drugs RiG 9 !
80
70
60 "N
50 A J 1
r. 1
40 ..7 , +2017
l —Pm—2018
1
30 —4t-2019
1
I Calendar 2020
20 I
10 I
0
>- > s - r w )- 1— ix ac c[ a
a u Q Z - w w w w
m m m m
d = ¢ d -. D 17 O Lc 2
Z 2 D w H w w
Q m < F U > U
w Q O O w
w w Z 0
Ln
Year
Month Count 2017 2018 2019 Calendar 2020
January 19 42 52 49
February 30 38 42 61
March 30 64 58 53
April 37 56 67 38
May 23 36 40 64
June 20 56 30
July 21 57 45
August 26 43 54
September 25 33 43
October 24 52 44
November 39 41 56
December 25 48 40
Grand Total 319 566 571 265
* IBR Offense: Drug Equipment Violations 35B&Drugs/Narcotics Violations
35A Produced: 6/17/2020
For Law Enforcement Use Only
This document is confidential and may not be further disseminated or released to any unauthorized persons pursuant to RCW 42.56.420
Spokane County Sheriff's Office .:, OUNr.
Regional Intelligence Group ;r
CA r
Spokane Valley Districts `, vs.'
IBR Classification: Theft From Motor Vehicle RIG r?
160
140
124
41101"1111.1 1
104
w
80 ,/,‘", 2017
JAI, 1iliP
�2018
6041111" —;ir–2019
, VI
—III—Calendar 2020
40 .
20
0 ,
} >- Z J - w , 'T U K ct
K tt' U 4 z -x v1 W UI LU W
D CO CO CO co
0 0 4 4 1 0 2 2
z Lr 2 D w I- LU w
4 CO < I- u > U
_.., w aL 0 0 w
LL W z a
Ul
Year
Month Count 2017 2018 2019 Calendar 2020
January 99 75 51 67
February 104 32 44 98
March 94 78 72 58
April 130 62 120 75
May 78 69 140 85
June 107 66 84
July 97 106 112
August 69 87 98
September 118 85 80
October 70 104 97
November 52 112 96
December 70 70 112
Grand Total 1088 946 1106 383
* IBR Offense:Theft From Motor Vehicle 23F Produced: 6/17/2020
For Law Enforcement Use Only
This document is confidential and may not be further disseminated or released to any unauthorized persons pursuant to RCW 42.56.420
Spokane County Sheriff's Office ', COUJVra
Regional Intelligence Group ,
,,,o-eig
Spokane Valley Districts g
IBR Classification: Motor Vehicle Theft RFC 9
50
45
40
1;00404141,
35
30 .Ad1
1116.
25 — 2017
\ler , I
—n-2018
2018
20 ,
I — .-2019
15 —M—Calendar 2020
10
I
5 I
0
, > 2w >- I- K S cr cc
cc cc U c, >-a z _, N w w W w
a a ac a. 2 D D m an m m
z z 2 D LU F. w w
Q w Q n~. 0 U 7 U
LL W z Q
in
Year
Month Count 2017 2018 2019 Calendar 2020
January 44 36 34 32
February 37 24 22 32
March 44 28 19 31
April 42 27 29 29
May 27 25 33 29
June 28 24 25
July 41 39 31
August 36 18 31
September 43 26 37
October 40 31 25
—
November 34 45 37
December 28 29 35
Grand Total 444 352 358 153
* IBR Offense: Motor Vehicle Theft 240 Produced: 6/17/2020
For Law Enforcement Use Only
This document is confidential and may not be further disseminated or released to any unauthorized persons pursuant to RCW 42.56.420
Spokane County Sheriffs Office ..,,,;,%coUNri' ,
Regional Intelligence Group ,o
,
�
1'
Spokane Valley Districts 2``,`;.
IBR Classification: Robbery Ric. 9
14I
12
I
IL)
8 '
, # ' i —•—2017
t1
. 1 ....2018
\ —*—2019
/ill)
--r—Calendar 2020
I L f
{
o
>- >- 2 _, r w rI- 0= K cc K
cc a U a Z _, ,o w u., w w
a Q cc D D m ea a0 a]
D D q Q o Q 2 2
Z 2 D w I- w us
Q m < H U > U
a O 0 w
w w Z 0
Year
Month Count 2017 2018 2019 Calendar 2020
January 3 6 3 8
February 6 2 8 12
March 7 5 4 6
April 3 6 4 8
May 2 8 6 3
June 1 3 2
July 4 7 8
August 1 6 11
September 4 6 8
October 4 5 7
November 3 3 11
December 1 4 10
Grand Total 39 61 82 37
* IRR Offense: Robbery 120 Produced: 6/17/2020
For Law Enforcement Use Only
This document is confidential and may not be further disseminated or released to any unauthorized persons pursuant to RCW 42.56.420
Spokane County Sheriff's Office ; couNrr,_
Regional Intelligence Group
5,5 r. ''vim
lP
Spokane Valley Districtsfa
IBR Classification: Assault 1 10 9 f.
120
l
100 r,_
80 . .4fr I 40 ifr' 1 lPf'
50 j —4-2017
I .
---1--2018
—A-2019
40 i
—U—Calendar 2020
20 I
I
0
7- >- 2 J T > F- x cc a K
cc cc V .T C z J w w w w
< < x a 7 D > > mm m m
D a a -, -, to 2 O 2 2
z x 2 m w F w Cu
-,-, co n 0 o w
O
w z
Year
Month Count 2017 2018 2019 Calendar 2020
January 96 _ 84 71 93
February 95 62 62 95
March 78 100 74 80
April 90 88 68 97
May 93 80 87 87
June 93 102 79
July 95 112 103
August 73 84 95
September 92 76 72
October 87 82 67
November 84 79 85
December 84 89 77
Grand Total 1060 1038 940 452
* IBR Offense:Aggravated Assault 13A&Simple Assault 13B Produced: 6/17/2020
For Law Enforcement Use Only
This document is confidential and may not be further disseminated or released to any unauthorized persons pursuant to RCW 42.56,420
Spokane County Sheriff's Office --4. coulTJ,s;,
Regional Intelligence Group o
f. i Jr
5 -0. _. __ .41
„.0.- , -,
Spokane Valley Districts M
IBR Classification: Theft #" c" 9
300
I
250
1 -...444161104100 ‘11410,.L i
200 \'-h' "Nir �� l
t
150 I 1 i —•—.2017
—11--2018
—A—2019
100
I —M—Calendar 2020
50 I
0
> >^+- y - > w r h cc cc cc cc
cc L V - Q Z J LnU) w w w
m m Per
Z 2 7 w N w w
Cr m d O O U > U
WZ 0
Year
Month Count 2017 2018 2019 Calendar 2020
January 205 238 238 240
February 199 165 188E 199
March 214 208 212 196
April 203 202 208 181
May 235 230 230 150
June 251 223 230
July 236 236 236
August 222 213 256
September 213 194 230
October 237 234 239
November 219 198 206
December 198 251 231
Grand Total 2632 2592 2704 966
* IBR Offense:Theft-All Other 23H,Theft-Pocket-Picking 23A,Theft-
Purse-Snatching 23B,Theft-Shoplifting 23C,Theft From Building 23D,
Theft From Coin-Operated Machine 23E, &Theft of Motor Vehicle
Parts/Accessories 23G Produced: 6/17/2020
For Law Enforcement Use Only
This document is confidential and may not be further disseminated or released to any unauthorized persons pursuant to RCW 42.56.420
Spokane County Sheriff's Officet,cOUNry,
Regional Intelligence Group p.., r. , ;-e....
cq
7.-A
Gq w
Spokane Valley Districts . ., ,, • ` f.
1RR Classification: Rape Ric;
18
16
I i
14
I i
12
10
•
-IN - 6-2017
8 i. —2018
6 N. .--2019
, NAfi,,,,,,,,.‘k —M—Calendar 2020
; , 1 41W7111k v_.., 4,
2 1 I
1
s cc U d z -' v, w w w w
Q Q cc d D D D m m m m
z cc 2 n w M w w
d m 4 M- u > u
w p o w
„ w z a
vl
Year
Month Count 2017 2018 2019 Calendar 2020
January 91 16 3 2
February 2 4 3 2
March 3 8 4 2
April 7 6 5
May 9 9 3 3
June 2_ 7 5
July 6 5 3
August 5 3 4
September 2 3 9
October 7 1 4
November 1 6 21
December 4 7 4
Grand Total 57 75 49 9
*IBR Offense: Rape-Forcible 11A,Sodomy-Forcible 118,Sexual Assault Produced: 6/17/2020
with Object- 11C
For Law Enforcement Use Only
This document is confidential and may not be further disseminated or released to any unauthorized persons pursuant to RCW 42.56.420
Spokane County Sheriff's Office ,, cOuN7
Regional Intelligence Group cf i ,r %
,., . .-E-1icG1/2' ', 1•lif_,,,,,'--i --., "Lir
Spokane Valley Districts - s
IBR Classification: Counterfeiting Forgery 1?i G 9
30
25
Illibr .
411\ !
II
20
1
•
15 \fr IP 4 kii -4-2017
—Di-2018
— 2019
10 i l
i I —a—Calendar 2020
11
5 I I
I
0 I
} } = J } w } 1.- K OC c, w
.. L..) K a z J V^lw w w W
d .'7
a a cC 2 7 CO CO CO m
z cL 2 71— w w
Q CO Q H U 7 U
Lu 0 0 w
LI- w 0
N
Year
Month Count 2017 2018 2019 Calendar 2020
January 9 18 22 22
February 11 10 13 11
March 20 24 17 14
April 20 22 13 14
May 26 21 10 10
June 15 15 14s
July 21 15 10
August 14 17 13
September 20 14 11
October 18 11 14
November 9 20 21
December 9 14 15
Grand Total 192 201 173 71
*IBR Offense:Counterfeiting/Forgery 250 Produced: 6/17/2020
For Law Enforcement Use Only
This document is confidential and may not be further disseminated or released to any unauthorized persons pursuant to RCW 42.56.420
Spokane County Sheriff's Office ..,.OOUNr
Regional Intelligence Group p sr c-:i
., . .._ 7,„
_. .. ,i,f',-.. '
Spokane Valley Districts Y
IBR Classification: Destruction Damage Vandalism `ia 9
200
1
180
160 1
1 1* _ Aft....._ +/
140 �I A!S W .1
120 4( 1
1
I
100 2017
I I
I —.El—2018
80
--A-2019
60 I --f—Calendar 2020
I I
40 I
20
0
r r x - >- w r F— cc cc re
cc cC U Q z -' 'n w w w w
< < 2 D > > CO m m to
a a U 0 2 2
z cc 7 D w F- w w
Q m < F- U 7 U
w eL 0 a w
LL wz O
<17
Year
Month Count j 2017 2018 2019 Calendar 2020
January 159 146 124 112
February 148 95 67 141
March 136 121 122 105
April 173 127 144 158
May 139 142 161 118
June 143 140 133
July 178 141 156
August 149 132 144
September 160 155 141
October 119 165 165
November 131 155 140
December 105 125 174
Grand Total 1740 1644 1671 634
1BR Offense: Destruction/Damage/Vandalism 290 Produced: 6/17/2020
For Law Enforcement Use Only
This document is confidential and may not be further disseminated or released to any unauthorized persons pursuant to RCW 42.56420