The URL can be used to link to this page

2020, 09-08 Regular Formal Format AGENDA SPOKANE VALLEY CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING FORMAL FORMAT Tuesday,September 8,2020 6:00 p.m. Remotely via ZOOM Meeting 10210 E Sprague Avenue Council Requests Please Silence Your Cell Phones During Council Meeting NOTE: In response to Governor Inslee's March 24, 2020 Proclamation concerning our recent State of Emergency, which waives and suspends the requirement to hold in-person meetings and provides options for the public to attend remotely,all meeting guidelines contained in the Governance Manual are hereby superseded until the Governor's order has been rescinded or amended. Therefore,effective immediately and until further notice,a live feed of the meeting will be available on our website and on Comcast channel 14.Public comments will only be accepted for those items noted on the agenda as "public comment opportunity," will be accepted via the following links, and must be received by 4:00 pm the day of the meeting. • Sign up to Provide Oral Public Comment at the Meeting via Calling-In • Submit Written Public Comment Prior to the Meeting • NEW: Join the Zoom WEB Meeting CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL APPROVAL OF AGENDA INTRODUCTION OF SPECIAL GUESTS AND PRESENTATIONS COMMITTEE,BOARD,LIAISON SUMMARY REPORTS MAYOR'S REPORT PROCLAMATION: Constitution Week GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT OPPORTUNITY [l]: Use the link above to sign up for oral public comments.The link will guide you to directions to sign up for oral public comments.This is an opportunity for the public to speak on any subject except agenda action items, as public comments will be taken on those items where indicated. Please keep comments to matters within the jurisdiction of the City Government. This is not an opportunity for questions or discussion. Diverse points of view are welcome but please keep the remarks civil. Remarks will be limited to three minutes per person. 1. CONSENT AGENDA: Consists of items considered routine which are approved as a group. Any member of Council may ask that an item be removed from the Consent Agenda to be considered separately. Proposed Motion:I move to approve the Consent Agenda. a.Approval of claim vouchers on Sept 8,2020,Request for Council Action Form Total: $282,423.59 b.Approval of Payroll for Pay Period Ending August 31,2020: $539,769.38 c.Approval of August 25,2020 Council Meeting Minutes,Regular Formal Format NEW BUSINESS: 2. Second Reading Ordinance 20-007 Code Text Amendment,Annexation—Mike Basinger,Erik Lamb [no public comment: Public Hearing previously held] 3. Second Reading Ordinance 20-008 Comprehensive Plan Amendments—Mike Basinger [no public comment: Public Hearing previously held] Council Agenda Sept 8,2020 Page 1 of 2 4. Second Reading Ordinance 20-009 Comprehensive Plan Zoning Map Amendment—Mike Basinger [no public comment: Public Hearing previously held] 5. Second Reading Ordinance 20-010 Code Text Amendment,Essential Public Facilities—Lori Barlow [no public comment: Public Hearing previously held] 6.First Reading Ordinance 20-011 Amending SVMC 9.20 Motorized Personal Transportation Device— Erik Lamb [public comment opportunity] GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT OPPORTUNITY [21: Use the link above to sign up for oral public comments.The link will guide you to directions to sign up for oral public comments.This is an opportunity for the public to speak on any subject except agenda action items, as public comments will be taken on those items where indicated. Please keep comments to matters within the jurisdiction of the City Government. This is not an opportunity for questions or discussion. Diverse points of view are welcome but please keep the remarks civil. Remarks will be limited to three minutes per person. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS: 7. Estimated Revenues and Expenditures,2021 Budget—Chelsie Taylor 8.Advance Agenda—Mayor Wick INFORMATION ONLY(will not be reported or discussed): 9.Finance Department Monthly Report 10. Police Department Monthly Repot CITY MANAGER COMMENTS EXECUTIVE SESSION: 11. Pending Litigation [RCW 42.30. 110(1)(i)] ADJOURNMENT Council Agenda Sept 8,2020 Page 2 of 2 Spokane Valley® roctamation City o.f Spokane raffey, Washington Constitution Week WHEREAS, The Constitution of the United States of America, the guardian of our liberties, embodies the principles of limited government in a Republic dedicated to rule by law; and WHEREAS, September 17, 2020, marks the two hundred thirty third anniversary of the framing of the Constitution of the United States of America by the Constitutional Convention; and WHEREAS, It is fitting and proper to accord official recognition to this magnificent document and its memorable anniversary, and to the patriotic celebrations which will commemorate the occasion; and WHEREAS, Public Law 915 guarantees the issuing of a proclamation each year by the President of the United States of America designating September 17 through 23, as Constitution Week. NOW, THEREFORE, I, Ben Wick, Mayor of the City of Spokane Valley, on behalf of the Spokane Valley City Councilmembers, do hereby proclaim the week of September 17 through 23 as Constitution Week and I encourage all citizens to reaffirm the ideals the Framers of the Constitution had in 1787 by vigilantly protecting the freedoms guaranteed to us through this guardian of our liberties, remembering lost rights may never be regained. Dated this 8th day of September, 2020. Ben Wick, Mayor CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: Sept 8,2020 Department Director Approval: /1 Check all that apply: ® consent ❑ old business El new business ❑ public hearing AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Approval of the Following Vouchers: VOUCHER LIST VOUCHER NUMBERS TOTAL AMOUNT 08/21/2020 51511-51519 $45,070.88 08/24/2020 8813-8820 $3,978.00 08/26/2020 51520-51560 $125,455.82 08/28/2020 51561-51595 $102,987.93 08/31/2020 51596 $990.00 09/01/2020 51597-51601 $3,940.96 GRAND TOTAL: $282,423.59 Explanation of Fund Numbers found on Voucher Lists #001 -General Fund 001.090.000.560. General Gov't-Social Services 001.011.000.511. City Council 001.090.000.594 General Gov't-Capital Outlay 001.013.000.513. City Manager 00I.013.015.515. Legal Other Funds: 001.016.000. Public Safety 101 —Street Fund 001.018.013.513. Deputy City Manager 103 —Paths &Trails 001.018.014.514. Finance 105--Hotel/Motel Tax 001.018.016.518. Human Resources 106—Solid Waste 001.040.041. Engineering 120—CenterPlace Operating Reserve 001.040.042. Economic Development 12I —Service Level Stabilization Reserve 001.040.043. Building 122—Winter Weather Reserve 001.076.000.576. Parks &Rec—Administration 204—Debt Service 001.076.300.576. Parks &Rec-Maintenance 301 —REST 1 Capital Projects 001.076.301.571. Parks &Rec-Recreation 302—REET 2 Capital Projects 001.076.302.576. Parks &Rec-Aquatics 303 —Street Capital Projects 001.076.304.575. Parks &Rec- Senior Center 309—Parks Capital Grants 001.076.305.571. Parks &Rec-CenterPlace 310—Civic Bldg. Capital Projects 001.090.000.511. General Gov't- Council related 311 —Pavement Preservation 001.090.000.5I4. General Gov't-Finance related 312—Capital Reserve 001.090.000.517. General Gov't-Employee supply 314—Railroad Grade Separation Projects 001.090.000.518. General Gov't- Centralized Serv. 402—Stormwater Management 001.090.000.519. General Gov't-Other Services 403 —Aquifer Protection Area 001.090.000.540. General Gov't-Transportation 501 —Equipment Rental &Replacement 001.090.000.550. General Gov't-Natural &Eco. 502—Risk Management 001.090.000.595. General Gov't-Pavement Preser. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to approve attached list of claim vouchers. [Approved as part of the Consent Agenda, or may be removed and discussed separately.] STAFF CONTACT: Chelsie Taylor, Finance Director ATTACHMENTS: Voucher Lists vehlist Voucher List Page: 1 08/21/2020 12:00:10PM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 51511 8/21/2020 001169 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY June-Aug 2020 001.040.043.558 PETTY CASH:19827,19828,19829 1.85 Total: 1.85 51512 8/21/2020 003297 HIGGINS, LEWIS ROD Expenses 001.011.000.511 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 13.34 Total: 13.34 51513 8/21/2020 000313 INLAND ASPHALT COMPANY INC. PAY APP 3 311.000.285.595 0285-CONSTRUCTION 36,162.16 Total: 36,162.16 51514 8/21/2020 000252 LOWE'S BUSINESS ACCOUNT Aug 2020 101.042.000.543 SUPPLIES:CITY HALL,MAINT SHOP 235.74 Total: 235.74 51515 8/21/2020 000868 POWER CITY ELECTRIC CON. INC. PAY APP 3 303.000.259.595 0259-CONSTRUCTION 7,576.10 Total: 7,576.10 51516 8/21/2020 007743 SCHROEDER,TYSON Expenses 001.040.041.558 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 31.58 Total: 31.58 51517 8/21/2020 007072 WASH.STATE TRANSPORTATION P-E-208(P05)-1 303.000.267.334 CIP 0267:MISSION AVE 943.39 Total: 943.39 51518 8/21/2020 004917 WHITE,KARLA Expenses 001.018.014.514 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 69.92 Total: 69.92 51519 8/21/2020 002651 WOODARD,ARNE Expenses 001.011.000.511 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 23.00 Expenses 001.011.000.511 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 13.80 Total: 36.80 9 Vouchers for bank code: apbank Bank total: 45,070.88 9 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers: 45,070.88 Page: 1 vchlist Voucher List Page: 08/24/2020 12:53:29PM Spokane Valley Bank code: pk-ref Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 8813 8/24/2020 004931 DUNCAN MOTIVATION INC PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 CANCELLATION REFUND:GREAT ROC 946.00 Total: 946.00 8814 8/24/2020 007259 NEGATIVE SPLIT PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 CANCELLATION REFUND:MIRABEAU r 497.00 Total: 497.00 8815 8/24/2020 006338 NWFATRUST PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 CANCELLATION REFUND:ROOM 213 485.00 Total: 485.00 8816 8/24/2020 007928 PATRICK, CHRISTINA PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 CANCELLATION REFUND:MIRABEAU r 159.00 Total: 159.00 8817 8/24/2020 007929 SIMON,LANCE PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 CANCELLATION REFUND:MIRABEAU r 634.00 Total: 634.00 8818 8/24/2020 007925 SPARLIN, MIKE PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 CANCELLATION REFUND:TERRACE V 159.00 Total: 159.00 8819 8/24/2020 007922 TRAUTMAN,MARYANN PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 CANCELLATION REFUND:FIRESIDE L( 1,073.00 Total: 1,073.00 8820 8/24/2020 007926 TRIBBLE,SYLVIA PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 REFUND CAMP IN A BOX 25.00 Total: 25.00 8 Vouchers for bank code: pk-ref Bank total: 3,978.00 8 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers: 3,978.00 Page: f vchlist Voucher List Pager —1. 08/26/2020 2:56:54PM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 51520 8/26/2020 002604 DELL FINANCIAL SERVICES LLC 80524044 001.090.000.548 COMPUTER LEASE:001-8922117-006 231.89 Total: 231.89 51521 8/26/2020 000002 H&H BUSINESS SYSTEMS INC. AR161600 001.011.000.511 COPIER COSTS:WEST WING/COUNCIL 107.42 AR161601 001.018.014.514 COPIER COSTS: IT 11.51 AR161602 001.018.016.518 COPIER COSTS:HR 10.12 AR161603 001.013.000.513 COPIER COSTS:OPS/ADMIN 133.63 AR161604 001.013.015.515 COPIER COSTS:LEGAL 91.80 AR161605 001.040.043.558 COPIER COSTS:PERMIT CTR 31.07 AR161606 001.040.041.543 COPIER COSTS:CPW ENGINEERING 262.76 AR161607 101.042.000.542 COPIER COSTS:MAINTENANCE SHOF 4.97 AR161608 001.076.000.576 COPIER COSTS:CENTERPLACE 193.57 Total: 846.85 51522 8/26/2020 001107 ADVANCED TRAFFIC PRODUCTS 0000027073 101.042.000.542 CABINET/MOUNT- 8TH&DISHMAN-M 3,699.75 Total: 3,699.75 51523 8/26/2020 007671 HORROCKS ENGINEERS INC 57151 001.040.041.558 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,125.00 Total: 2,125.00 51524 8/26/2020 000652 OFFICE DEPOT INC. 100964878001 001.040.041.543 OFFICE SUPPLIES: ENGINEERINGIDE\ 144.82 104891937001 001.040.041.543 OFFICE SUPPLIES:ENGINEERING/DEN 64.61 111686210001 001.040.041.543 OFFICE SUPPLIES:ENGINEERING/DE\ 105.93 506109333001 001.040.041.543 OFFICE SUPPLIES:ENGINEERING/DO 42.01 510755401001 001.040.041.543 OFFICE SUPPLIES:ENGINEERINGIDE\ 11.22 512251114001 001.040.041.543 OFFICE SUPPLIES:ENGINEERINGIDE\ -347.89 Total: 20.70 51525 8/26/2020 000038 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF SPOKANE 0072379-1518-1 402.402.000.531 WASTE MGMT:VACTORING WASTE JU 2,321.37 Total: 2,321.37 51526 8/26/2020 003682 EPIC LAND SOLUTIONS INC 0720-0857 303.000.249.595 0249-REAL ESTATE SERVICES 1,834.61 Total: 1,834.61 51527 8/26/2020 000662 NAT'L BARRICADE&SIGN CO 1008589 303.000.294.542 0294-TRAFFIC SIGNS 2,331.66 Total: 2,331.66 Page: " 9 vchlist Voucher List Page: 2-- 08/2612020 2:66:54PM Spokane Valley ,C/ Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 51528 8/26/2020 002288 SARGENT ENGINEERS INC. 33162 303.000.310.595 0310-DESIGN SERVICES 5,259.50 Total: 5,259.50 51529 8/26/2020 001903 SPOKANE TRAFFIC CONTROL INC 5061 101.043.000,542 TRAFFIC CONTROL 1,035.00 Total: 1,035.00 51530 8/26/2020 000090 SPOKANE CO INFO SYSTEMS 50319798 001.011.000.511 COUNTY IT SUPPORT JULY 2020 14,261.06 Total: 14,261,06 51531 8/26/2020 000093 SPOKESMAN-REVIEW,THE 0000015556 001.011.000.511 ADVERTISING ACCT 42365 496.81 Total: 496.81 51532 8/26/2020 002043 HDR ENGINEERING INC 1200285320 303.000.273.518 0273-DESIGN SERVICES 515.30 Total: 515.30 51533 8/26/2020 004231 BELSBY ENGINEERING 57152 403.000.317.595 0317-SURVEY SERVICES 827.58 Total: 827.58 51534 8/26/2020 003261 FEHR&PEERS 139639 303.000.300.595 0300-ENGINEERING SERVICES 600.00 Total: 600,00 51535 8/26/2020 003261 FEHR&PEERS 139679 314.000.311.595 0311-DESIGN ENGINEERING 3,125.20 Total: 3,125.20 51536 8/26/2020 000994 SIMPSON ENGINEERS INC. 16801-05 303.000.295.595 CIP 0295:SURVEYING 2,500.00 Total: 2,600,00 51537 8/26/2020 000459 SPOKANE CO TITLE CO 0313 BARKER 303.000.313.595 CIP 0313: PLANT INFO GUARANTEE 1,633.50 5-SP28632 303.000.313,595 CIP 0313:PLANT INFO GUARANTEE 326.70 Total: 1,960.20 51538 8/26/2020 000459 SPOKANE CO TITLE CO 5-SP28408 303.000.301.595 CIP 0301:PLANT INFO GUARANTEE 326.70 Total: 326.70 51539 8/26/2020 000958 AAA SWEEPING LLC 68356 402.402.000.531 STREET SWEEPING 13,720.52 68360 402.402.000.531 STORM DRAIN CLEANING 34,468.37 Total: 48,188.89 Page: -2 vchlist Voucher List Page: -" —3-- 08/2612020 2:56:54PM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 51540 8/26/2020 003337 ARROW CONSTRUCTION SUPPLY INC 278155 101.042.000.542 SMALL TOOLS/MINOR EQUIPMENT 15.92 Total: 15.92 51541 8/26/2020 002562 CD'A METALS 638936 101.000.000.542 VEHICLE REPAIR&MAINT.SUPPLIES 221.73 Total: 221.73 51542 8/26/2020 003255 DAY WIRELESS SYSTEMS INV641885 101.042.000.543 TOWER RENT 216.57 Total: 216.57 51543 8/26/2020 002920 DIRECTV INC 37663608955 101.042.000.543 CABLE SERVICE FOR MAINTENANCE 74.24 Total: 74.24 51544 8/26/2020 002157 ELJAY OIL COMPANY 4304322 001.040.041.543 FUEL FOR MAINTENANCE SHOP 846.00 Total: 846.00 51545 8/26/2020 001232 FASTENAL CO IDLEW151897 101.042.000.542 PPE GLOVES 419.61 Total: 419.61 51546 8/26/2020 005474 FREIGHTLINER NORTHWEST PC001485134:02 101.000.000.542 VEHICLE REPAIR&MAINT.SUPPLIES 16.10 Total: 16.10 51547 8/26/2020 000692 GUS JOHNSON FORD 920088 101.042.000.542 VEHICLE REPAIR:#5-217 296.22 922895 001.040.041.556 REPAIR SERVICE:#4-008 1,113.60 Total: 1,409.82 51548 8/26/2020 002518 INLAND PACIFIC HOSE&FITTINGS 1051940 101.000.000.542 VEHICLE REPAIR&MAINT.SUPPLIES 67.37 Total: 67.37 51549 8/26/2020 002466 KENWORTH SALES COMPANY SPOIN4132346 101.000.000.542 VEHICLE REPAIR&MAINT.SUPPLIES 55.21 Total: 55.21 51550 8/26/2020 005049 PEDERSON,MICHAEL ROY JULY 2020 101.042.000.542 DEAD ANIMAL REMOVAL 975.00 Total: 975.00 51551 8/26/2020 004131 SPOKANE CO SOLID WASTE MGMT 51649 101.042.000.542 TRANSFER STATION CHARGES:CPW 79.56 Total: 79.56 51552 8/26/2020 001969 SUNSHINE DISPOSAL 1617829 101.042.000.542 TRANSFER STATION CPW JULY 2020 388.65 Page: ---- vchlist Voucher List Page: 4 _ 4--- 08/26/2020 2:56:54PM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor invoice FundlDept DescriptioniAccount Amount 51552 8/26/2020 001969 001969 SUNSHINE DISPOSAL (Continued) Total: 388.65 51553 8/26/2020 003318 TACOMA SCREW PRODUCTS INC 24165131 101.042.000.542 VEHICLE REPAIR&MAINT.SUPPLIES 89.52 Total: 89.52 51554 8/26/2020 007159 THE HOME DEPOT PRO 563966837 101.042.000.543 SUPPLIES:MAINTENANCE SHOP 42.54 565300142 101.042.000.543 SUPPLIES:MAINTENANCE SHOP 21.24 Total: 63.78 51555 8/26/2020 001888 COMCAST 8/17/2020-9116/2020 001.076.305.575 INTERNET/PHONE:CENTERPLACE 408.74 Total: 408.74 51556 8/26/2020 002604 DELL FINANCIAL SERVICES LLC 80525719 001,090,000.548 COMPUTER LEASE:001-8922117-005 2,288.54 Total: 2,288.54 51557 8/26/2020 007304 FIRSTLINE COMMUNICATIONS 159915 001.090.000.518 IT SUPPORT 152.46 Total: 152.46 51558 8/26/2020 003264 SHI INTERNATIONAL CORP B12144494 001.076.301.571 ADOBE CREATIVE CLOUD SUBSCRIPT 893.77 Total: 893.77 51559 8/26/2020 000307 OFFICE OF THE STATE TREASURER JULY 2020 001.237.00.00 STATE REMITTANCE 23,785.73 Total: 23,785.73 51560 8/26/2020 000308 SPOKANE CO PROSECUTING ATTY JULY 2020 001.016.000.589 CRIME VICTIMS COMPENSATION REM 479.43 Total: 479.43 41 Vouchers for bank code: apbank Bank total: 125,455.82 41 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers: 125,455.82 Page: •4--- vchlist . Voucher List Page: , - 1-- 08/28/2020 10:17:28AM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 51561 8/28/2020 007678 RANDALL DANSKIN PS 132632 001.013.015.515 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,398.00 Total: 2,398.00 51562 8/28/2020 007136 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES INC 1PYV-6YJ6-K7PQ 001.076.301.571 SUPPLIES FOR PARKS AND REC 119.76 Total: 119.76 51563 8/28/2020 004046 AMERICAN ONSITE SERVICES 352696 001.076.300.576 PORTABLE RESTROOMS AT PARKS 240.00 Total: 240.00 51564 8/28/2020 007741 REFRIGERATION SUPPLIES DIST 16256063-00 001.076.305.575 REPAIR AND MAINT SUPPLIES CENTEI 844.36 Total: 844.36 51565 8/28/2020 001903 SPOKANE TRAFFIC CONTROL INC 5256 001.076.301.571 TRAFFIC CONTROL 520.25 Total: 520.25 51566 8/28/2020 002306 TERRELL LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT,MICHAEL 4028 309.000.304.594 0304-DESIGN AND CN MANAGEMENT 7,900.57 Total: 7,900.57 51567 8/28/2020 001134 WA STATE DEPT OF HEALTH 84745-1 001.076.300.576 2020 OPERATING PERMIT:WATER SYE 101.30 Total: 101.30 51568 8/28/2020 000958 AAA SWEEPING LLC 68364 001.033.000.518 STORM DRAIN CLEANING-CITY HALL 1,296.89 Total: 1,296.89 51569 8/28/2020 000334 ARGUS JANITORIAL LLC INV07830 101.042.000.543 JANITORIAL SVCS:CITY HALL,PREC1F 9,714.84 Total: 9,714.84 51570 8/28/2020 003337 ARROW CONSTRUCTION SUPPLY INC 277441 001.033.000.518 REAPAIR AND MAINT SUPPLIES FOR C 70.44 Total: 70.44 51571 8/28/2020 000143 CITY OF SPOKANE In-034197 001.040.043.558 HEARING EXAMINER: INTERLOCALAG 6,210.00 Total: 6,210.00 51572 8/28/2020 000019 PURFECT LOGOS LLC 53857 001.040.043.524 DECALS FOR VEHICLES 217.80 Total: 217.80 51573 8/28/2020 007159 THE HOME DEPOT PRO 563695865 001.033.000.518 SUPPLIES FOR CITY HALL 246.66 Page: -4" (73 vchlist Voucher List Page: L `2- 08/28/2020 10:17:28AM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice FundlDept Description/Account Amount 51573 8/2812020 007159 THE HOME DEPOT PRO (Continued) 564483758 001.033.000.518 SUPPLIES FOR CITY HALL 84.32 Total: 330.98 51574 8/2812020 000135 APA 144189-2075 001.040.042.558 APA MEMBERSHIP 575.00 Total: 575.00 51575 8/28/2020 007882 MAUL FOSTER&ALONGI INC 39966 001.040.319.558 0319-HAP CONSULTING 5,137.00 Total: 5,137.00 51576 8/28/2020 007114 CARDINAL INFRASTRUCTURE LLC 1770 001.011.000.511 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 6,500.00 Total: 6,500.00 51577 8/28/2020 001253 GORDON THOMAS HONEYWELL July 2020 1042 001.011.000.511 GOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS SERVICES 5,000.00 Total: 5,000.00 51578 8/28/2020 000065 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 3453203281 001.013.000.513 SUPPLIES FOR OPS AND ADMIN 425.76 Total: 425.76 51579 8/28/2020 007136 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES INC 1 WFW-96QN-TDWC 001.090.000.517 SUPPLIES FOR GEN GOV-COVID REL 239.48 Total: 239.48 51580 8/28/2020 000746 EMPLOYMENT SECURITY DEPT 000-217155-00-2 502.502.000.517 2ND QUARTER 2020 UI TAX 2,306.88 Total: 2,306.88 51581 8/28/2020 004850 NAVIA BENEFIT SOLUTIONS,HRA PLAN 10268479 001.018.016.518 FLEX SPENDING ADMINISTRATION 392.00 Total: 392.00 51582 8/28/2020 008143 ACTION DRAIN AND ROOTER WA LLC 348048 001.076.305.575 DRAIN SERVICE AT CENTERPLACE 299.48 Total: 299.48 51583 8/2812020 004046 AMERICAN ONSITE SERVICES 352801 001.076.300.576 PORTABLE RESTROOMS AT PARKS 240.00 352802 001.076.300.576 PORTABLE RESTROOMS AT PARKS 240.00 Total: 480.00 51584 8/28/2020 000652 OFFICE DEPOT INC. 116612537001 001.076.000.576 OFFICE SUPPLIES PARKS AND CP 100.97 Total: 100.97 . Page: ,2 - uchlist Voucher List Page: -a-' 08/28/2020 10:17:28AM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 51585 8/28/2020 001860 PLATT ELECTRIC SUPPLY 0P77071 001.076.305.575 SUPPLIES FOR CENTERPLACE 87.94 Total: 87.94 51586 8)28/2020 007677 PROCTOR SALES INC 0293444-IN 001.076.305.575 SUPPLIES FOR CENTERPLACE 294.90 Total: 294.90 51587 8/28/2020 007741 REFRIGERATION SUPPLIES DIST 16256605-00 001.076.305.575 SUPPLIES AT CENTERPLACE 73.91 16256605-01 001.076.305.575 SUPPLIES FOR CENTERPLACE 158.73 Total: 232.64 51588 8/28/2020 000709 SENSKE LAWN&TREE CARE INC. 10146151 001.076.300.576 ADDITIONAL EMPLOYEE TO CLEAN PF 1,524.60 Total: 1,524.60 51589 8/28/2020 000854 SPVV LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS 1976.01 001.076.000.576 VALLEY MISSION HORSE ARENA MAS1 2,475.00 Total: 2,475.00 51590 8/28/2020 007120 TSHIMAKAIN CREEK LABORATORY 2023403 001.076.300.576 ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING AT PARKS 25.00 Total: 25.00 51591 8/28/2020 000487 YMCA OF THE INLAND NW July 2020 001.076.302.576 OPERATING EXPENSESIMGMT FEE R. 11,914.90 Total: 11,914.90 51592 8/28/2020 000030 AVISTA July 2020 001.076.300.576 UTILITIES:PARKS MASTER AVISTA 7,489.01 Juiy 2020 101.042.000.542 UTILITIES:CPW MASTER AVISTA JULY 24,443.08 Total: 31,932.09 51593 8/28/2020 001447 FREE PRESS PUBLISHING INC 51162 001.011.000.511 LEGAL PUBLICATION 188.65 Total: 188.65 51594 8/28/2020 005012 SPOKANE CO ENVIRONMENTAL Aug 2020 001.076.302.576 SPOKANE CO SEWER CHRGS:AUG 2C 1,605.93 Total: 1,605.93 51595 8/28/2020 000324 SPOKANE CO WATER DIST#3 Aug 2020#1 402.402.000.531 WATER CHARGES FOR AUG#1 1,284.52 Total: 1,284.52 35 Vouchers for bank code: apbank Bank total: 102,987.93 35 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers: 102,987.93 Page: .-3 �C vchlist Voucher List Page: "9' 08/31/2020 11:01:37AM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice FundlDept Description/Account Amount 51596 8/31/2020 006723 CITY OF LIBERTY LAKE SEPAAPPEAL FEE 001.013.015.515 SEPAAPPEAL FEE 990.00 Total: 990.00 1 Vouchers for bank code: apbank Bank total: 990.O0 1 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers: 990,00 1,the undersigned,do certify under penalty of perjury, that the materials have been furnished,the services rendered,or the labor performed as described herein and that the claim is just,due and an unpaid obligation against the City of Spokane Valley,and that I am authorized to authenticate and certify said claim. Finance Director Date Council member reviewed: Mayor Date Council Member Date Page: // vchlist Voucher List Page: -1-- 09/0112020 3:46:55PM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept DescriptionlAccount Amount 51597 9/1/2020 001606 BANNER BANK 3169 July 2020 001.076.301.571 WALMART 3.09 3169 July 2020 001,076,305.575 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES 530.33 3169 July 2020 001.076.305.575 M&L SUPPLY 55.84 3169 July 2020 001.076.301.571 DOLLAR STORES 28.31 3169 July 2020 001.076.301.571 WALMART 6.62 3169 July 2020 001.076.000.576 CCS MAGNUSON BUILDING 3.00 3169 July 2020 001.076.301.571 WALMART 21.32 3169 July 2020 001.076.301.571 DOLLAR TREE 9.80 3169 July 2020 001.076.301.571 WALMART 89.69 3169 July 2020 001.076.305.575 EVENTECTIVE 1,056.00 3169 July 2020 001.076.305.575 SCULPTURED GARDENS 24.47 3169 July 2020 001.076.301.571 HOBBY LOBBY 18.01 3169 July 2020 001.076.301.571 THE HOME DEPOT 2.13 3169 July 2020 001.076.301.571 NORTH 40 OUTFITTERS 80.47 3169 July 2020 001.076.301.571 WALMART CREDIT-RETURN -3.66 Total: 1,925.42 51598 911/2020 001606 BANNER BANK 8573 July 2020 001.033.000.518 WA STATE DEPT OF L&I 86.30 8573 July 2020 001.033.000.518 AUTO RAIN 23.35 8573 July 2020 001,033,000.518 ACE HARDWARE 57.66 8573 July 2020 001.033.000.518 MAVERIK- 17.78 8573 July 2020 001,033,000.518 AUTO RAIN- 125.24 8573 July 2020 001.018.014.514 TAYLOR COMMUNICATIONS 351.55 8573 July 2020 402.402.000,531 PETERS HARDWARE 300.30 8573 July 2020 001.033.000.518 GIBSON'S NURSERY&LANDSCAPE 298.39 8573 July 2020 001.013.000.613 CARUSOS SANDWICH CO 256.92 Total: 1,517.49 51599 9/1/2020 001606 BANNER BANK 8557 July 2020 001.011.000.511 GREATER SPOKANE INC 320.00 Total: 320.00 51600 9/1/2020 001606 BANNER BANK 6368 July 2020 001.040.042.558 FACEBOOK 1.38 6368 July 2020 001.016.016.521 AUTO RAIN 64.66 Total: 66.04 51601 9/1/2020 001606 BANNER BANK 9392 July 2020 001.040.043.558 NORTH 40 OUTFITTERS 57.01 Page; -1._- vchlist Voucher List Page: D9/01/2020 3:46:55PM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 51601 9/1/2020 001606 BANNER BANK (Continued) 9392 July 2020 001.040.043.524 WACE 55.00 Total: 112.01 5 Vouchers for bank code: apbank Bank total: 3,940.96 5 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers: 3,940.96 I,the undersigned,do certify under penalty of perjury, that the materials have been furnished,the services rendered,or the labor performed as described herein and that the claim is just,due and an unpaid obligation against the City of Spokane Valley,and that I am authorized to authenticate and certify said claim. Finance Director Date Council member reviewed; Mayor Date Council Member Date Page: CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: September 8, 2020 Department Director Approval : Item: Check all that apply: ® consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Payroll for Pay Period Ending August 31, 2020 GOVERNING LEGISLATION: PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: BACKGROUND: Budget/Financial impacts: Employees Council Total Gross: $ 321,914.41 $ 10,265.00 $ 332,179.41 Benefits: $ 195,346.49 $ 12,243.48 $ 207,589.97 Total payroll $ 517,260.90 $ 22,508.48 $ 539,769.38 RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to Approve above payroll. [Approved as part of the Consent Agenda, or may be removed and discussed separately.] STAFF CONTACT: Raba Nimri DRAFT MINUTES SPOKANE VALLEY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING FORMAL FORMAT Spokane Valley City Hall Spokane Valley,Washington August 25,2020 Mayor Wick called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. The meeting was held remotely via ZOOM meeting. Attendance: Councilmembers Staff Ben Wick,Mayor Mark Calhoun, City Manager Pam Haley, Councilmember John Hohman,Deputy City Manager Tim Hattenburg Councilmember Erik Lamb,Deputy City Attorney Rod Higgins, Councilmember Mike Stone,Parks&Recreation Director Linda Thompson, Councilmember Chaz Bates, Senior Planner Arne Woodard, Councilmember Lori Barlow, Senior Planner Mike Basinger,Economic Development Mgr Absent: Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Brandi Peetz,Deputy Mayor ROLL CALL City Clerk Bainbridge called the roll; all Councilmembers were present except Deputy Mayor Peetz. It was moved by Councilmember Thompson, seconded and unanimously agreed to excuse Deputy Mayor Peetz from tonight's meeting. APPROVAL OF AMENDED AGENDA It was moved by Councilmember Hattenburg, seconded and unanimously agreed to approve the agenda. INTRODUCTION OF SPECIAL GUESTS AND PRESENTATIONS n/a COMMITTEE,BOARD,LIAISON SUMMARY REPORTS Councilmember Haley: said she heard that Councilmember Hattenburg gave a great rundown of what happened at the STA(Spokane Transit Authority)meeting;she added that the STA received a federal transit grant of$2.5 million to purchase seven,double-decker buses for the Cheney route; she also mentioned that STA usually does not meet in August; and said she personally is busy grading housing first grant applications. Councilmember Higgins: said the Clean Air Agency will conduct final interviews tomorrow for the vacant director position. Councilmember Thompson: stated that she continues virtual meetings with the NLC (National League of Cities) constituency groups, such as Women in Municipal government; said that an AWC (Association of Washington Cities) group held their first equity workgroup meeting to discuss what leaders can do in partnership with other elected officials; mentioned she personally sent a letter supporting Multi-Care's request to have percutaneous coronary intervention capabilities at their hospital. Councilmember Hattenburg: said he spent time in the community speaking with various small business owners who are very supportive and thankful of being made aware of the CARES funds. Councilmember Woodard: mentioned he attended a couple Farmers' Markets; and said that the HCDAC (Housing and Community Development Advisory Committee)will meet in September. MAYOR'S REPORT Mayor Wick said that as chair of the Health District Board, they are working on guidance for all school districts for potential re-opening and/or distance learning;said there was some confusion among the districts Regular Formal Council Meeting:08-25-2020 Page 1 of 5 Approved by Council: DRAFT but they are working to find ways to safely open school;mentioned the letter of support for Multi-Care and even though the deadline has passed, asked Council if they would like to send a letter from the Council; Councilmembers nodded in agreement and Mayor Wick said he will check to see whether that will still have an impact since the deadline has passed. PROCLAMATION:Recognizing 100th Anniversary of 19th Amendment Adoption Mayor Wick read the proclamation recognizing the 100th anniversary of the ratification of the 19th Amendment. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT OPPORTUNITY Ill: Mayor Wick briefly explained the process for giving public comment; he asked that people speak to matters within the City's jurisdiction, and to please be civil. Three people had previously signed up to speak: Ms.Diana Wilhite, Spokane Valley: regarding Council's interaction with the public, said that a past mayor found it necessary to delete public comment for a time as he was not happy with what citizens had to say; she said it is the right of the public to ask,comment or criticize actions or events that concerns city business; today the present council has bent over backwards to allow citizens to speak their minds on matters that have no connection to city action; said this is a terrible waste of Council's time to allow people to rail on for their own personal vendetta; she suggested Council needs to change their Governance Manual to have public comments pertain to city business and said she feels the City Attorney can draft language to make that possible without restricting first amendment rights. Ms.Barb Howard,Spokane Valley: said that since Mayor Wick is the chair of the Health Board,she wants to know why we keep having rallies or protests with members from S.C.O.P.E. and the Sheriff's office, with people not wearing masks; said she feels the Sheriff should enforce the wearing of masks. Ms.Beva Miles, Spokane Valley: said she is a rules and procedure kind of person and that some people tell her they won't watch or attend Council meetings as some people have taken that opportunity during their comments,to chastise the Council or berate others;said she applauds Ms.Wilhite's comments and suggests Council look at their Governance Manual and Roberts Rules of Order when it comes to dilatory comments from the public; adding that she feels the public respects and appreciates Council. 1. CONSENT AGENDA: Consists of items considered routine which are approved as a group. Any member of Council may ask that an item be removed from the Consent Agenda to be considered separately. Proposed Motion:I move to approve the Consent Agenda. a.Approval of claim vouchers on Aug 25, 2020,Request for Council Action Form Total: $2,721,198.35 b.Approval of Payroll for Pay Period Ending August 15,2020: $378,230.27 c.Approval of July 21,2020 Council Meeting Minutes, Study Session d.Approval of July 28,2020 Council Meeting Minutes,Regular Formal Format e.Approval of August 4,2020 Council Meeting Minutes, Special Meeting Workshop f.Approval of August 4,2020 Council Meeting Minutes, Special Meeting g.Approval of August 11,2020 Council Meeting Minutes,Regular Formal Format It was moved by Councilmember Hattenburg, seconded and unanimously agreed to approve the Consent Agenda. NEW BUSINESS: 2.First Reading Ordinance 20-007 Code Text Amendment,Annexation—Mike Basinger,Erik Lamb After City Clerk Bainbridge read the ordinance title,it was moved by Councilmember Haley and seconded to advance Ordinance No. 20-007 to a second reading as proposed. Mr. Basinger briefly explained that this ordinance will replace the current chapter 19.180 of the City's Code as it will strengthen the policy framework for annexation in order to provide direction to potential applicants and staff regarding annexation requests.There were no public comments. Vote by acclamation: in favor:unanimous. Opposed: none. Motion carried. Regular Formal Council Meeting:08-25-2020 Page 2 of 5 Approved by Council: DRAFT 3.First Reading Ordinance 20-008 Comprehensive Plan Amendments—Mike Basinger After City Clerk Bainbridge read the ordinance title,it was moved by Councilmember Haley and seconded to advance Ordinance 20-008, Comprehensive Plan amendments, to a second reading as proposed. Mr. Basinger gave an overview of the direction provided at the August 11 meeting, including the addition of the R4 zone,which if approved would be a city-wide rezone. In response to a question about the difference between R3 and R4,Mr.Basinger said staffs' approach to limit duplex subdivisions was through the use of incentives; he said we don't usually take things away, but rather look for opportunities for incentives for different types of development; he said the idea is if you were to go forward with a single family development in the R3 zone you would get eight units per acre; and if you went forward with a duplex you would get six units per acre and said the hope is that will be an incentive for single family development and home ownership; said staff had some concerns with the R4 zone about where we might see cottage and townhouse developments, and that the concern was, what is the most appropriate place for those types of development; said staff feels that the areas where these types of homes should be built is in areas where we have transportation and services,which he said is why staff looked at that half-mile distance from Sprague Avenue down to 8th,and up to Broadway. There were no public comments. Vote by acclamation: in favor: unanimous. Opposed: none. Motion carried. 4.First Reading Ordinance 20-009 Comprehensive Plan Zoning Map Amendment—Mike Basinger After City Clerk Bainbridge read the ordinance title,it was moved by Councilmember Haley and seconded to advance Ordinance 20-009, Official Zoning Amendments, to a second reading as proposed.Mr.Basinger stated that this is the companion piece to the previous ordinance as this amends the zoning map.There were no public comments. Vote by acclamation: in favor: unanimous. Opposed: none. Motion carried. 5.First Reading Ordinance 20-010 Code Text Amendment,Essential Public Facilities—Lori Barlow After City Clerk Bainbridge read the ordinance title,it was moved by Councilmember Haley and seconded to advance Ordinance No. 20-010 to a second reading as proposed. Senior Planner Barlow went through the PowerPoint explaining the process of this City-initiated code text amendment to allow essential public facilities within the mixed use zone and not be permitted in the residential zones. Ms. Barlow mentioned the new R4 zone as per the comp plan proposed amendment, and said should that ordinance be adopted, this ordinance will come forward at the second reading with the R4 zone included as a zone where essential public facilities will not be permitted. There were no public comments. Vote by acclamation: in favor: unanimous. Opposed: none. Motion carried. 6.Motion Consideration: Washington Dept. of Commerce Memorandum of Understanding—Chaz Bates It was moved by Councilmember Hattenburg and seconded to authorize the City Manager to finalize and execute the memorandum of Understanding between the Washington State Department of Commerce and the City of Spokane Valley,for participation in the Manufacturing Roadmap program. After Mr. Bates' brief explanation of the program, it was noted there were no public comments. Vote by acclamation: in favor: unanimous. Opposed: none. Motion carried. 7. Motion Consideration: Spokane Valley Chamber CARES Agreement Amendment — Erik Lamb, Jeff Kleingartner It was moved by Councilmember Haley and seconded to approve the amended Agreement between the City of Spokane Valley and the Greater Spokane Valley Chamber of Commerce for CARES Act Coronavirus Relief Fund grant, and authorize the City Manager to.finalize and execute the agreement as amended in substantially the form presented. Deputy City Attorney Lamb stated that following his explanation of this amendment,Mr.Kleingartner will give Council an update on our efforts to market this program.Mr.Lamb explained that since Council approved the agreement, two issues have come up: first, the program was intended to begin a week after the Spokane County program application period ended;but Spokane County extended their application period to August 14, and accordingly, the Chamber recommended and staff agreed that our program should be pushed one week to begin August 24. Second,Mr.Lamb explained,the Regular Formal Council Meeting:08-25-2020 Page 3 of 5 Approved by Council: DRAFT chamber identified a potential issue with the prohibition of us awarding grants to nonprofits that received a County grant; said this is due to the limited number of nonprofits within the County and the large number that provide services regionally throughout the County;therefore,he explained,the Chamber has requested and staff agreed to propose an amendment to the agreement to allow the City funds to be awarded to nonprofits only, even if they had been awarded County funds, provided they demonstrated expenses and lost revenues in an amount supporting both a County grant and a City grant to prevent duplicate payments of federal funds for the same lost expenses or revenues.There was some brief discussion about businesses versus nonprofits with Mr. Lamb explaining that if you are a business, Council identified they wanted the business to be in Spokane Valley but with nonprofits,they don't have to be located in Spokane Valley but they still must provide that 18% service in Spokane Valley; he said there are 380 businesses with a zip code that could be in Spokane Valley under the County program; and only about 300 nonprofits region- wide. Although no one signed up to speak to this publicly,Mayor Wick permitted Chamber President Mr. Lance Beck to speak.Mr.Lance briefly stated that the assumption is there is a different level of demand on businesses versus nonprofits; that county-wide there is about a 10:1 ratio of small businesses compared with nonprofits. Public Information officer Kleingartner then went through his PowerPoint explaining the marketing campaign, its overview, digital advertising with KREM and social media, postcard mailings, press releases and emails,newspaper ads, social media posts, and articles on our website as well as a large website homepage banner to run until September 4. Vote by acclamation: in favor: unanimous. Opposed: none. Motion carried. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT OPPORTUNITY 121: Mayor Wick mentioned that the comments are limited to three minutes each. It was noted that two people had previously signed up to comment: Ms. Barb Howard, Spokane Valley: mentioned that she had called Parks & Recreation Director Stone to thank him for the drive-in movies, and asked that that feature remain as it helps keep a lot of kids out of problems. Ms. Pete Miller Spokane Valley: read a portion of an e-mail from John Patrouch,which was one of four e- mailed comments she submitted earlier to the City Clerk in favor of the establishment of the R4 zone; and she thanked staff for their work and thanked Council for moving this forward. City Clerk Bainbridge mentioned that she previously e-mailed the noted e-mails to Councilmembers. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS: 8. Council 2021 Budget Goals—Mark Calhoun Mr. Calhoun went over the goals included on his August 25, 2020 Request for Council Action form, and explained that each year we prepare an annual budget,and these goals will be included in the 2021 budget cycle once adopted in November; adding that the goals are the same as in the 2020 budget,as the goals tend to be large in nature; and that tonight he seeks consensus for approval. Councilmember Thompson suggested the following changes: goal#2: instead of`continue to pursue a plan' change to `actively'pursue a plan;goal#4: instead of`continue with and expand where possible' change to `sustain and expand where possible'; and for goal #9: not pursue, but increase community interactions sharing of information and obtain feedback on current and future projects and priorities. There were no objections from Councilmembers to the changes. Mr. Calhoun noted the list of goals will move forward, and that these goals will be included in the initial October 13 draft language. 8.Advance Agenda—Mayor Wick There were no suggested changes to the Advance Agenda. 9. Department Monthly Reports The Department Monthly Reports were for information only and were not reported or discussed. Regular Formal Council Meeting:08-25-2020 Page 4 of 5 Approved by Council: DRAFT CITY MANAGER COMMENTS City Manager Calhoun Mark mentioned that there is only one item on the September 1 meeting, and he proposed moving that to the September 8 meeting,and thereby cancelling that September 1 meeting. There were no objections. Mr. Calhoun noted that staff and Council have spent a lot of time on the Pines grade separation project, and he showed the newly created video to supplement the project's presentations. It was moved by Councilmember Thompson, seconded and unanimously agreed to adjourn. The meeting adjourned at 7:40 p.m. ATTEST: Ben Wick,Mayor Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Regular Formal Council Meeting:08-25-2020 Page 5 of 5 Approved by Council: CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: September 8, 2020 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ® new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Second Reading Ordinance No. 20-007 Code Text Amendment (CTA- 2020-0001) to the Chapter 19.180 SVMC, Annexation. GOVERNING LEGISLATION: SVMC 17.80.150, SVMC 19.30.040; RCW 36.70A.106 and chapter 35A.14 RCW PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: In 2019 the City adopted amendments to the Comprehensive Plan that included the following policies and strategy: ■ LU-P19 Develop criteria to identify, process, and assess the annexation of land into Spokane Valley ■ LU-P20 Identify land designations for potential annexation areas in the Comprehensive Plan for the adjacent Urban Growth Areas to the City ■ CF-P16 Plan and coordinate the location of public facilities and utilities in potential annexation areas, including identifying the fiscal impacts of providing the facilities, utilities, services, and maintenance. ■ Strategy: Evaluate and develop criteria to assist in the evaluation of annexations. On August 8, 2020, staff provided an administrative report to City Council. On August 25, 2020, Council heard the first reading of proposed Ordinance No. 20-007 Code Text Amendment (CTA- 2020-0001) to the Chapter 19.180 SVMC, Annexation. BACKGROUND: Since the adoption of the Comprehensive Plan Update in late 2016, the City has received a number of informal inquiries regarding annexation into the City. During these discussions it was determined that the existing policy framework for annexation needed to be strengthened to provide direction to potential applicants and staff regarding annexation requests. The proposed amendment to Chapter 19.180 of the SVMC is the implementation measure to provide criteria for considering proposed annexations, including review of public facilities and fiscal impacts. While the proposal doesn't identify land designations, it provides a mechanism to address zoning of newly annexed areas. It implements the Comprehensive Plan policies and strategies. Annexation is a tool allowing the City to "annex" and incorporate areas outside of the City boundaries into the City boundaries. Property that is annexed becomes subject to all City laws, including land use, taxation, and other regulatory laws. Further, since the property becomes part of the City, the City becomes responsible for providing services to citizens within the annexed area, as well as for providing and maintaining any public infrastructure or facilities within the annexed area. Thus, it is important for the City to carefully review proposed annexations to understand the fiscal impact to the City to provide necessary services and infrastructure, as well as to understand what value the annexed area will bring to the City, such as adding new available industrial, commercial, or park land for development and beneficial use. Notably, the City does not provide water, sewer, power, or gas, so the primary services are street-related services (sweeping, maintenance, plowing, stormwater, etc.) and public safety. Generally, the proposed criteria (1) identifies the process for either City Council or an outside person or entity to propose an annexation, (2) identifies criteria to be evaluated, including existing facilities, new facilities needed, anticipated services to meet City service levels, anticipated expenses, and anticipated revenues, (3) identifies a process to address zoning upon annexation, and (4) establishes clearly that City Council may approve or deny any annexation brought by petition at its sole discretion. Due to the extensive modifications, the proposed Ordinance will repeal existing chapter 19.180 SVMC in its entirety and replace it with the proposed revised chapter 19.180 SVMC. OPTIONS: Move to approve the ordinance with or without further amendments, or take other action deemed appropriate. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to approve Ordinance No. 20-007, Code Text Amendment to Chapter 19.180 SVMC as proposed. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: None STAFF CONTACT: Mike Basinger, Economic Development Manager Erik Lamb, Deputy City Attorney ATTACHMENTS: 1. Draft Ordinance No. 20-007; 2. Planning Commission Findings of Fact and recommendation; 3. Planning Commission minutes; and 4. Staff Report DRAFT CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY SPOKANE COUNTY,WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO.20-007 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON REPEALING AND REPLACING CHAPTER 19.180 OF THE SPOKANE VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE RELATED TO NEWLY ANNEXED AREAS, AND OTHER MATTERS RELATING THERETO. WHEREAS,the City of Spokane Valley(City)previously adopted Title 19 of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code(SVMC)relating to zoning and land use regulations,and has made subsequent amendments from time-to-time as appropriate; and WHEREAS, such regulations are authorized by chapter 36.70A RCW; and WHEREAS, City staff have proposed an amendment to Chapter 19.180 of the SVMC to provide criteria for considering proposed annexations,including review of public facilities and fiscal impacts; and WHEREAS,pursuant to RCW 36.70A.106,on May 26,2020 the Washington State Department of Commerce was notified with the City's notice of intent to adopt amendments to Spokane Valley development regulations; and WHEREAS,on June 11,2020,the Planning Commission held a study session; and WHEREAS, on June 12, 2020 and June 19, 2020, notice of the Planning Commission public hearing was published in the Valley News Herald; and WHEREAS, on July 9, 2020,the Planning Commission held a public hearing,received evidence, information,public testimony, and a staff report with a recommendation,followed by deliberations; and WHEREAS,on July 23,2020,the Planning Commission approved the findings and recommended that City Council adopt the amendments; and WHEREAS, on August 11, 2020, City Council reviewed the proposed amendments, Planning Commission Findings and Recommendations; and WHEREAS, on August 25, 2020 City Council considered a first ordinance reading to adopt the proposed amendment; and WHEREAS, on September 8, 2020 City Council considered a second ordinance reading to adopt the proposed amendment; and WHEREAS,the amendment set forth below is consistent with the goals and policies of the City's Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, chapter 19.180 SVMC as amended, bears a substantial relation to the public health, safety,welfare and protection of the environment. NOW,THEREFORE,the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley ordains as follows: Ordinance 20-007—Repeal and Replace Chapter 19.180 SVMC Page 1 of 5 DRAFT Section 1. Purpose. The purpose of this Ordinance is to amend chapter 19.180 SVMC to provide criteria for considering proposed annexations, including review of public facilities and fiscal impacts. Section 2. Findings and Conclusions. The City Council acknowledges that the Planning Commission conducted appropriate investigation and study, held a public hearing on the proposed amendments and recommends approval of the amendments. The City Council has read and considered the Planning Commission's findings. The City Council hereby makes the following findings: A. Growth Management Act Policies - Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA) provides that each city shall adopt a comprehensive land use plan and development regulations that are consistent with and implement the comprehensive plan. B. City of Spokane Valley Goals and Policies-The City of Spokane Valley has adopted goals and policies consistent with the GMA and adopted County-Wide Planning Policies, set forth below. LU-P19: Develop criteria to identify, process, and assess the annexation of land into Spokane Valley. LU-P20: Identify land designations for potential annexation areas in the Comprehensive Plan for the adjacent Urban Growth Areas to the City. CF-P16: Plan and coordinate the location of public facilities and utilities in potential annexation areas, including identifying the fiscal impacts of providing the facilities, utilities, services,and maintenance. Strategy: Evaluate and develop criteria to assist in the evaluation of annexations. C. Conclusions 1. The Planning Commission held a properly noticed public hearing and conducted deliberations on July 9, 2020. The Commission voted 7-0 to recommend that City Council adopt the amendment. 2. The proposed amendment bears substantial relation to public health, safety, welfare and protection of the environment. The proposed regulations provide guidance to the City, to evaluate the consequences of the annexation on utilities, sanitation, traffic, and law enforcement. The proposed regulations will also allow the City to evaluate the financial impacts of the annexation on providing the required public services at the City's adopted levels of service. This evaluation will analyze the costs to provide services and anticipated revenues from the proposed annexation area to support the required levels of service. Further the regulations provide a clear process for establishing interim comprehensive plan designations and zoning for any annexed areas. 3. The proposed amendment implements established Comprehensive Plan policies and strategies. It provides the regulatory framework to carefully review proposed annexations to understand the fiscal impact to the City to provide necessary services and infrastructure, as well as to understand what value the annexed area will bring to the City, such as adding new available industrial,commercial,or park land for development and beneficial use. Ordinance 20-007—Repeal and Replace Chapter 19.180 SVMC Page 2 of 5 DRAFT 4. The proposed City-initiated Code text amendment is consistent with the City's adopted Comprehensive Plan and the approval criteria pursuant to SVMC 17.80.150(F). Section 3. Repeal and Adoption. Chapter 19.180 SVMC is hereby repealed in its entirety and replaced as follows: 19.180.005 Purpose. The purpose of this chapter is to clarify the process and criteria to annex adjacent and contiguous areas into the City,and to ensure that the fiscal impacts of providing the facilities,utilities,services,and maintenance of the annexation area are adequately considered prior to annexation. 19.180.010 Annexation Methods and Applicability. A. All annexations shall occur pursuant to the procedures set forth in chapter 35A.14 RCW, as adopted or amended and as otherwise allowable by law. In addition to all other procedures allowed by law, all voter- initiated, City Council initiated, and direct petition annexations shall be subject to the procedures set forth in this chapter 19.180 SVMC. Other types of annexations may,but are not required to use these procedures. B. To be eligible for annexation,the entire subject area must be within an adopted Urban Growth Area and be contiguous with the City boundary. 19.180.020 Annexation Evaluation Criteria. A. The purpose of this section is to provide criteria to evaluate annexations on the basis of their short-and long-term community impact. Annexations shall be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. B. Prior to approval or disapproval of any annexation as allowed by law, the City shall consider at a minimum the following: 1. The ability of the City and other applicable entities to provide required public services at a level equal to or better than that available from current service providers; 2. The financial impact of providing the required public services at the City's adopted levels of service, including potential sources of revenue. Review of financial impact shall include at a minimum an analysis of the costs to provide services and anticipated revenues from the proposed annexation area to support required levels of service; 3. The impact of annexation on any applicable City bonded indebtedness,including an analysis of the impact of City bonded indebtedness upon property within the proposed annexation area; 4. Whether the annexation would follow logical boundaries,such as streets,waterways,or substantial topographic changes; 5. Whether the annexation would eliminate an irregularity or irregularities in the City's boundaries, thereby improving service delivery; 6. Review of existing infrastructure prior to defining boundaries of the proposed annexation to determine logical inclusions or exclusions,including but not limited to the review of the following factors: a. Whether right-of-way will be needed for the provision of utilities or transportation links. Ordinance 20-007—Repeal and Replace Chapter 19.180 SVMC Page 3 of 5 DRAFT b. Whether there are pre-existing utilities from a particular district or jurisdiction that are currently in a right-of-way. c. Whether the existing transportation network will produce an unfair burden on the City for the operation,maintenance and preservation or replacement of assumed infrastructure. 7. Zoning that will be applicable for the proposed annexation area, subject to the requirements of SVMC 19.180.040; and 8. Review of any other impact identified as necessary by the City. C. Prior to any annexation,the City will confer with affected special districts and Spokane County to assess the impact of the annexation. Where possible,boundaries should be mutually resolved by the jurisdictions before final action on the proposed annexation. D. The City may request that petitioner(s)provide information regarding the identified impacts as part of a petition or part of the petition process,may require the petitioner(s)to respond to inquiries regarding the impacts,and may require the petitioner(s)to conduct any studies necessary to evaluate any of the identified impacts at their cost or to pay for such studies undertaken by the City. 19.180.030 Jurisdictional cooperation. A. The City shall, as appropriate, cooperate with Spokane County and other municipalities to identify, review, and address area-wide comprehensive planning, zoning, and service provision to urban growth areas that are contiguous to the City's municipal boundaries. B. When determined to be advantageous to the City, the City should assist in the creation of interlocal agreements to provide technical and financial support to contiguous urban growth areas for the extension and improvement of public services and facilities. C. The City will cooperate with Spokane County and other service providers to establish uniform street and utility standards within adopted service areas of the City as appropriate. 19.180.040 Newly annexed areas. A. Annexed areas shall be annexed with the following Comprehensive Plan and zoning designations: 1. The Comprehensive Plan and zoning designation set forth in joint planning designations; or 2. The closest comparable City Comprehensive Plan and zoning designation to that imposed by Spokane County. B. Upon annexation of property, in the absence of a pre-established zoning designation,the City Council shall, within the annexation ordinance, establish an interim classification for the property on the City's Comprehensive Plan and zoning map. The interim zone shall be consistent with the annexation area's Comprehensive Plan designation. If an interim Comprehensive Plan and zoning designation(s) is established, it shall be in place no longer than 12 months unless otherwise provided by ordinance. The process for establishing an interim zoning district shall meet the requirements of RCW 36.70.795. For all property classified in the interim zone,the City shall commence all steps necessary to establish an official zoning classification pursuant to the procedure described in SVMC 17.80.140. Ordinance 20-007—Repeal and Replace Chapter 19.180 SVMC Page 4 of 5 DRAFT C. The City may seek to mitigate increased expenses due to annexation through any means allowed by law. An example would be to seek agreement from all property owners within the annexed area that they will not object to the formation of a local improvement district to bring existing infrastructure into compliance with adopted City standards. 19.180.050 Decision on Annexation. Subject to applicable law regarding annexations by election, the City Council shall not be obligated to approve or disapprove any annexation,regardless of the outcome of the review undertaken pursuant to this chapter 19.180 SVMC. Section 4. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance shall be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section,sentence,clause,or phrase of this Ordinance. Section 5. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect five days after publication of this Ordinance or a summary thereof in the official newspaper of the City of Spokane Valley as provided by law. Passed by the City Council this day of September,2020. ATTEST: Ben Wick,Mayor Christine Bainbridge,City Clerk Approved as to Form: Office of the City Attorney Date of Publication: Effective Date: Ordinance 20-007—Repeal and Replace Chapter 19.180 SVMC Page 5 of 5 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE SPOKANE VALLEY PLANNING COMMISSION CTA-2020-0001 —Proposed Amendment to Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) Pursuant to SVMC 17.80.150(E) the Planning Commission shall consider the proposal and shall prepare and forward a recommendation to the City Council following the public hearing. The following findings are consistent with the Planning Commission recommendation that City Council adopt the amendment. Background: 1. Pursuant to RCW 36.70A.130, Spokane Valley adopted its Comprehensive Plan Update and updated development regulations on December 13,2016,with December 28,2016 as the effective date. 2. Since the adoption of the Comprehensive Plan in late 2016,the City has received a number of informal inquiries regarding annexation into the City. During these discussions it was determined that the existing policy framework for annexation needed to be bolstered to provide clearer direction to potential applicants and staff regarding annexation requests. 3. In 2019 the City adopted amendments to the Comprehensive Plan that to provide clear direction of what should be considered as part of annexation requests. 4. CTA-2020-0001 is a City-initiated text amendment to chapter 19.180 SVMC that implements the annexation policies adopted in 2019.The proposed regulations provide for a set of criteria to fairly and uniformly evaluate annexations,their impacts on existing residents and the ability to serve the new area at adopted levels of service. The regulations also provide a mechanism for the City to evaluate the financial impact of the annexation and mitigate that impact to existing residents in the event an annexation is approved. 5. The Planning Commission held a properly noticed public hearing and conducted deliberations on July 9, 2020. The Commissioners voted 7-0 to recommend that the City Council adopt the amendment. Planning Commission Findings: 1. Compliance with SVMC 17.80.150(F)Approval Criteria a. The proposed text amendment attached as Exhibit 1 is consistent with the applicable provisions of the Comprehensive Plan: Findings: The proposed amendment is supported by the Comprehensive Plan and is consistent with the following policies and strategy: LU-P19 Develop criteria to identify,process,and assess the annexation of land into Spokane Valley LU-P20 Identify land designations for potential annexation areas in the Comprehensive Plan for the adjacent Urban Growth Areas to the City CF-P16 Plan and coordinate the location of public facilities and utilities in potential annexation areas,including identifying the fiscal impacts of providing the facilities,utilities, services, and maintenance. Strategy Evaluate and develop criteria to assist in the evaluation of annexations. b. The proposed amendment bears a substantial relation to public health, safety,welfare and protection of the environment. Findings: Findings and Recommendations of the Spokane Valley Planning Commission CTA-2020-0001 Page 1 of 2 The proposed amendment bears a substantial relation to public health,safety,welfare, and protection of the environment.Under the existing provisions for annexation there are no criteria to evaluate annexation requests. The proposed regulations provide guidance to the City,to evaluate the consequences of the annexation on utilities, sanitation,traffic,and law enforcement.The proposed regulations will also allow the City to evaluate the financial impacts of the annexation on providing the required public services at the City's adopted levels of service.This evaluation will analyze the costs to provide services and anticipated revenues from the proposed annexation area to support the required levels of service. Further the regulations provide a clear process for establishing interim comprehensive plan designations and zoning for any annexed areas. 2. Conclusion: The proposed text amendment is consistent with Comprehensive Plan and bears a substantial relation to public health, safety,welfare, and protection of the environment. 3. Recommendation: The Spokane Valley Planning Commission therefore recommends the City Council approve CTA-2020- 0001. Attachments: Exhibit 1 —Proposed Amendment CTA-2020-0001 Approved this 23``' day of July,2020 Planning Commission Chair ATTEST Deanna Horton,Administrative Assistant Findings and Recommendations of the Spokane Valley Planning Commission CTA-2020-0001 Page 2 of 2 Regular Meeting Minutes Spokane Valley Planning Commission Council Chambers—City Hall June 11,2020 I. Chair Johnson called the meeting to order at 6:02 p.m. The meeting was held remotely via ZOOM meeting. II. Commissioners, staff and audience stood for the pledge of allegiance. III. Secretary to the Commission Deanna Horton took roll and the following members and staff were present: Erik Lamb, City Attorney Fred Beaulac Jenny Nickerson, Building Official Walt Haneke Lori Barlow, Senior Planner James Johnson Chaz Bates, Senior Planner Danielle Kaschmitter Mike Basinger, Economic Development Timothy Kelley Manager Robert McKinley Taylor Dillard, Administrative Sherri Robinson Assistant Marianne Lemons, Office Assistant Deanna Horton, Secretary to Planning Commission IV. AGENDA: Commissioner Kaschmitter made a motion to approve the June 11, 2020 agenda as presented. There was no discussion. The vote on the motion was seven in favor, zero against and the motion passed. V. MINUTES: Commissioner Kaschmitter made a motion to approve the May 14, 2020 minutes as presented. There was no discussion. The vote on the motion was seven in favor, zero against and the motion passed. VI. COMMISSION REPORTS: Chairman Johnson reported that he has continued to attend the Spokane County Human Rights Task Force meetings. VII. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT: Building Official Nickerson thanked the commission for adjusting to the new Zoom meeting platform. VIIL PUBLIC COMMENT: There was no public comment. IX. COMMISSION BUSINESS: a. Study Session: CTA-2020-0001: A proposed change to Spokane Valley Municipal Code(SVMC) 19.180,Newly Annexed Areas Economic Development Manager Mike Basinger gave a presentation to the commission explaining the city initiated code text amendment that will amend Chapter 19.180 of the SVMC to clarify the process and criteria to annex adjacent and contiguous areas into the city and to ensure that the fiscal impacts of providing the facilities, utilities, services, and maintenance of the annexation area are adequately considered prior to annexation. Deputy City Attorney Erik Lamb provided additional information regarding annexation. He explained that the amendment will clarify the annexation process for the three types of 1 06-11-2020 Planning Commission Minutes Page 2 of 6 annexation requests: voter initiated, City Council initiated and direct petition. It will outline the criteria that will be evaluated including existing and new facilities, services, expenses and revenues. It will also clearly identify the process to address zoning upon annexation. Chair Johnson asked for clarification regarding zoning for specific parcels as they request to annex into the city limits. Mr. Basinger answered that when the city annexes a property it is zoned with a designation that is the most similar to its current designation with the County. It will then be brought through the amendment process to evaluate what the zoning should be and go through the public process to make that final designation. Chairman Johnson asked for information regarding financial impact. He asked if a property would still be considered for annexation if it is found that the tax value received would be lower than the cost to the city. Mr. Basinger answered that this criteria will just be used as guidelines for the Council to consider when they make those decisions regarding annexation. b. Study Session: CTA Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendments Mr. Basinger explained that local jurisdictions are allowed to make amendments to the Comprehensive Plan once each year. There are five proposed amendments that will be considered during 2020; four map amendments and one text amendment. A public hearing will be held on June 25, 2020. Notice of hearing will be published twice prior to the fifteen day requirement, the site was posted with a"Notice of Hearing" sign, and individual notice was mailed to all residents within a 400 foot radius of the subject properties. After the public hearing, the request will move to Council where they will review Planning Commission findings, consider the public hearing, and approve/modify/deny the request. The floor was given to Senior Planner Chaz Bates to discuss the details of each proposed amendment. CPA-2020-0001: Request to change the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation from Single Family Residential(SFR)to Corridor Mixed Use(CMU) and to change the Zoning District from Single Family Residential Urban (R-3)to Corridor Mixed Use(CMU). Mr. Bates said that this amendment is privately initiated for the property located at 1311 N McDonald Road, between Mission and Broadway. It is owned by Land Use Solutions and Entitlement. The request is to rezone the property from single-family residential (R-3)to Corridor Mixed Use (CMU). The property to the east is zoned multi-family,the property to the south is corridor mixed use, and the west and south are zoned single family residential. Findings show there are no critical areas on the site, the site would support the redevelopment of the parcel, is supported by the transportation network, and is compatible with the surrounding uses. CPA-2020-0002: Request to change the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation from Industrial(I)to Regional Commercial(RC) and to change the Zoning District from Industrial(I) to Regional Commercial(RC). 2 06-11-2020 Planning Commission Minutes Page 3 of 6 Mr. Bates stated that this amendment is a privately initiated request for the property located off of Sprague and Fancher and is owned by Lawrence B. Stone Properties. The request is to convert the zoning on 3 acres of land from Industrial (I) to Regional Commercial (RC). The properties to the north are zoned industrial and the property to the south and the west are regional commercial. Findings show that there are no critical areas,the site is completely paved,the change would support redevelopment of an underused property, is supported by the transportation network and is compatible with the surrounding uses. CPA-2020-0003: Request to change the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation from Multifamily Residential(MFR) to Corridor Mixed Use (CMU) and to change the Zoning District from Multifamily Residential(MFR) to Corridor Mixed Use(CMU). Mr. Bates stated that this amendment is a privately initiated request for the property located south of Mission and west of Pines and is owned by Jay Rambo. The request is to convert the zoning of 6.24 acres from Multifamily Residential (MFR)to Corridor Mixed Use(CMU). The properties to the west is corridor mixed use,the north is industrial,the east is corridor mixed use and the south is single family residential. Findings show that there are no critical areas, the site supports redevelopment of an underused property, is supported by the transportation network and is compatible with the surrounding uses. A trip generation and distribution letter was completed by the City of Spokane Valley's Senior Engineer and shows a net increase of traffic volumes of one car during the PM peak hour. All other times of the day remain the same. Commissioner Haneke asked if the developer wants to build additional apartment buildings on the property and expressed concern about traffic flow in the area. Mr. Bates answered that this zoning designation would allow for additional multifamily dwelling units or retail. Attorney Lamb responded that the analysis done for this change shows the change from multi-family to corridor mixed use, it is not for a specific proposal. The current zoning of multi-family allows for a significant amount of trips. Corridor mixed use zoning will add more flexibility of uses but according to the traffic study it should not impact the traffic flow more than one car during the peak PM period. Commissioner Kaschmitter asked about the open space requirement for corridor mixed use designation. Building Official Nickerson responded that there are different requirements in the current Spokane Valley Municipal code between multifamily versus corridor mixed use zones. Multifamily does require open space but corridor mixed use does not. If open space was still required, Mission Park would provide the multifamily open space requirement. CPA-2020-0006: Request to change the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation from Industrial(I)to Corridor Mixed Use(CMU) and to change the Zoning District from Industrial(I) to Corridor Mixed Use(CMU). Mr. Bates stated that this amendment is a city-initiated request to change the 9 acre property located at 3830 N Sullivan Rd from Industrial (I)to Corridor Mixed Use (CMU). The property is owned by East Valley School District(EVSD) and currently houses the district's Walker Center. This location includes the EVSD administrative services and maintenance 3 06-11-2020 Planning Commission Minutes Page 4 of 6 building. The properties to the west,north, and east are all industrial uses, and to the south are retail service and industrial uses. Findings show that there are no critical areas, supports expanded educational uses, is supported by the transportation network, and is compatible with the surrounding areas. The proposed amendment allows flexibility so that that EVSD can provide educational services in this location. Education services are prohibited in the industrial zone and EVSD would like to move their Parent/Partner program to this location. CPA-2020-0007: Amend Chapter 2 Goals and Policies to provide policy guidance for increased housing density with access to support services like transit and commercial services, and provide implementing regulations. Mr. Basinger said that this is a city initiated text amendment that will apply city-wide. It will address alternative housing types such as duplexes, cottages, and townhomes. It is policy language that will help protect residential neighborhoods by incentivizing alternative housing in areas that are supported by existing infrastructure. Staff is proposing an area-wide rezone in hopes to address concerns from the residents regarding the influx of duplex developments and provide appropriate locations for alternative housing. The objective of this amendment is to address those concerns by creating areas that can support denser housing because of its location to transit and services. The vision is that there will be a larger variety of housing types available for residents and will help with housing affordability. The proposal will rezone 1218 acres within the City limits to the new zoning district,R-4. There is 57 vacant acres and 67 acres that are partially used. Studies show that there is potential for 1240 housing units which would lead to 3100 new residents. The proposed area is surrounded by multifamily and corridor mixed use zoning districts. The code text amendment will create the R-4 zone in the code and provide a description and outline permitted uses. The change specifies that duplex development in the R-3 zone shall have a minimum lot size of 14,500 square feet. There is also an additional text change in the Appendix A definitions that states that townhouses are not considered multifamily. Mr. Basinger stated that staffs analysis shows that single family development will incentivize the R-3 zone because the change will allow eight single family units per acre. The new R-4 zone will promote development of alternative housing types in those areas where transit and services are available giving a greater variety of housing types in areas that can handle an influx of residents. Commissioner McKinley asked what the ultimate intent is for the amendment. Mr. Basinger answered that the vision is to offer a variety of alternative housing within the city. Staff is optimistic that due to the density change in this amendment, the City might see some cottage or townhome developments that would offer more affordable options. Commissioner Kaschmitter asked if the Appleway Trail could be extended. She also asked if Spokane Transit Authority is considering making their services more frequent in this area. Mr. Basinger answered that there are plans to extend the Appleway Trail to Dishman Hills. The Transit Authority is optimistic that they would be able to extend their services as more development happens. They feel that more demand would drive them to offer additional services. Commissioner Beaulac asked about the notification process for the properties affected by this change. 4 06-11-2020 Planning Commission Minutes Page 5 of 6 Mr. Basinger answered that the public hearing has been published twice in the newspaper, it will be sent to the Comprehensive Plan distribution list that includes any person that has ever signed up to receive notifications about comprehensive plan changes (approximately 370 people), it will be published on all of the City's social media platforms, and a media release will be sent out prior to the public hearing. Chairman Johnson asked for clarification about sending notification out regarding the City- wide rezone. Mr. Basinger responded that the City does not send out letters to individual property owners when a City-wide rezone is done. However, staff hopes that the additional notices on social media,press releases, and the distribution list will get the word out to the residents about the change. c. Study Session: CTA-2020-0002. A proposed change to Spokane Valley Municipal Code 19.90, Essential Public Facilities. Senior Planner Lori Barlow gave a presentation on the city-initiated code text amendment to amend regulations on essential public facilities (EPF). The proposal is to prohibit locally significant essential public facilities in residential zones. She explained that essential public facilities are facilities that are typically hard to site because of their size and the nature of their use. These facilities include state and local correctional facilities, solid waste handling facilities, inpatient facilities which includes substance abuse facilities, mental health group homes and secure community transition facilities. Pursuant to the Growth Management Act, cities and counties are required to have procedures to site essential public facilities. They can't be precluded from being allowed within the city limits. However, the City can control the zones where they are located. This request is to preclude all of the residential zones; R-1, R-2, and R-3. The reason for this change is because there have been numerous detoxification facilities proposed within the City limits in the last few years. There was a controversial public hearing held recently for a detoxification center that wanted to move into a residential zone. Staff made the decision that it would be appropriate to look at making a change to limit the zones where these types of facilities can be sited. The City regulates essential public facilities pursuant to chapter 19.90 SVMC. The current regulations stipulate that a conditional use permit (CUP) is required for all essential public facilities to address any possible impacts. Currently, essential public facilities are allowed in all zones except mixed use and parks and open space. Chairman Johnson asked if the new R-4 zone would also be included. Ms. Barlow answered that the City will probably look to exclude that zone if it is created but the current code text amendment only addresses the zones that are in the code right now. Chairman Johnson asked the timeframe for this amendment. Ms. Barlow answered that the public hearing will be held in July,the findings of fact at the following meeting and then moving onto the City Council for their review and decision. X. GOOD OF THE ORDER: The Commissioners welcomed Commissioner Haneke to the board. Commissioner McKinley asked for an update regarding opening the City Hall for in person meetings. 5 06-11-2020 Planning Commission Minutes Page 6 of 6 Ms. Nickerson answered that the governor's order for COVID phase three does include allowing face-to-face with customers for government facilities. However, there is no date yet for when phase three will begin. The City has begun preparations for when opening does happen and is putting protocols in place to keep people safe while they are in City Hall. XI. ADJOURNMENT: Commissioner McKinley made a motion to adjourn the meeting at 8:06 pm. The vote on the motion was seven in favor, zero against, and the motion passed. , e9r James ohnson,Chair Date signed Deanna Horton, Secretary 6 Regular Meeting Minutes Spokane Valley Planning Commission Council Chambers—City Hall July 9,2020 I. Chair Johnson called the meeting to order at 6:01 p.m. The meeting was held remotely via ZOOM meeting. IL Commissioners, staff and audience stood for the pledge of allegiance. III. Secretary to the Commission Deanna Horton took roll and the following members and staff were present: Fred Beaulac Erik Lamb, Deputy City Attorney Walt Haneke Jenny Nickerson, Building Official James Johnson Lori Barlow, Senior Planner Danielle Kaschmitter Mike Basinger, Economic Development Manager Timothy Kelley Marianne Lemons, Office Assistant Robert McKinley Taylor Dillard, Administrative Assistant Sherri Robinson IV. AGENDA: Commissioner Kaschmitter moved to approve the agenda for July 9, 2020, with the exception of removing the corrected draft minutes from June 11, 2020, due to a technical error. There was no discussion. The vote on the motion was seven in favor, zero against and the motion passed. V. MINUTES: Commissioner Kaschmitter moved to approve the minutes for June 25, 2020 minutes as presented. Chairman Johnson moved to amend the stated location of the parcels for CPA-2020-0003 from south of Mission to north of Mission. The vote on the amendment was seven in favor, zero against and the amendment passed. The vote on the amended motion was seven in favor, zero against and the motion passed. VI. COMMISSION REPORTS: There were no Commission reports. VII. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT: Jenny Nickerson, Building Official offered a suggestion for the Planning Commission to voice their concerns with staff prior to the meeting so staff can provide information and acknowledge those concerns during their presentation. Mike Basinger, Economic Development Manager stated that the Planning Commission use the staff as their resource. VIII. PUBLIC COMMENT: There was no public comment. IX. COMMISSION BUSINESS: a. Public Hearing: CTA-2020-0001. A proposed amendment to Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) 19.180 Annexations. 1 07-09-2020 Planning Commission Minutes Page 2 of 4 The Public Hearing was opened at 6:10 pm. Mike Basinger, Economic Development Manager explained the code text amendment would amend Chapter 19.180 of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC)to provide further clarification for annexations. He explained that the only areas that can be considered for annexation must be in the Urban Growth Area. The city has received many informal inquiries regarding annexation and during these discussions, staff determined the existing regulations for annexation needs to be expanded to provide clear direction to potential applicants and staff regarding these requests. He stated that the proposed code text amendment will provide criteria to evaluate annexations. The criteria includes the impacts on existing residents,the ability to serve the new area at the adopted level of services, the financial impacts of the annexation and the methods for determining zoning upon annexation. Chairman Johnson expressed concern regarding the financial analysis criteria and that it may show that the area being annexed will not pay for itself. He also mentioned that the economic evaluation is a piece of infoiuration that the Planning Commission should utilize to help inform their decision. Mr. Basinger stated he appreciated Chairman Johnson's comment and that this is one of many criteria used to evaluate annexations. Deputy City Attorney,Erik Lamb stated that the criteria is not in any particular order and that City Council may approve or disapprove any annexation that comes forward. The meeting was open up for public testimony. No public testimony was offered on this matter. The public hearing was closed at 6:18. Commissioner Kaschmitter moved to recommend approval of CTA-2020-0001 to City Council. Commission Haneke added that people spend money in the city, which creates additional revenues for the surrounding businesses. Commission Robinson commented that residential areas in the county would still be using the city's infrastructure and that it would be beneficial if those residential areas were in the city. The vote on the motion was seven in favor, zero against and the motion passed. b. Public Hearing: CTA-2020-0002. A proposed amendment to Chapter 19.90 Essential Public Facilities SVMC and Chapter 19.60 Permitted Uses SVMC. The Public Hearing was opened at 6:18 pm. Senior Planner, Lori Barlow explained that this code text amendment would modify regulations for essential public facilities. Ms. Barlow explained that it would prohibit Essential Public Facilities (EPFs) from locating in residential zones and it would allow EPFs in the Mixed Use (MU) zone. Ms. Barlow explained that the proposed changes to Chapter 19.90 SVMC will reformat the regulations to highlight the process and then specifically add language to the regulations applicable to locally significant EPFs. She stated that the language added to the last section of 19.90 specifically states that EPFs with local significance are not permitted in the R-1, R-2, or R-3 zones. Ms. Barlow highlighted that the city does have the ability to determine which zone locally significant EPFs may be located in as long as there are adequate areas in the city that can provide for these EPFs. She stated that through this process, it has been determined that locally significant EPFs are not compatible with the single-family residential zones. The proposal is to prohibit locally significant EPFs from locations in the R-1, R-2, and R-3 zones. 2 07-09-2020 Planning Commission Minutes Page 3 of 4 Commissioner Beaulac asked about adding the Multi-Family residential zone to the R-1, R-2 or R-3 zones. Ms. Barlow explained that there are some EPFs designed to be in residential zones so it was determined that allowing these to be in the Multi-Family residential zone would meet the need for these locally significant EPFs to be located in a residential setting while still preserving the character of the other residential zones. Commissioner Beaulac asked for an example of what would be allowed in the Multi-Family residential zone for EPFs. Ms. Barlow explained a brief history of what prompted this amendment and gave an example of a small scale detox center. Commissioner Robinson requested clarification for facilities like NAOMI and other women's shelters. There was a short discussion on what services those shelters would need to provide to be considered and EPF. Commission Kaschmitter requested clarification on state and regional correctional facilities and if they could be included. Ms. Barlow answered that those would not be locally significant and they would have to go through the siting process with the Board of County Commissioners. She further explained the process that these EPFs would have to go through to determine the most suitable locations. The meeting was open up for public testimony. No public testimony was offered on this matter. The public hearing was closed at 6:32. Commissioner Kaschmitter moved to recommend approval of CTA-2020-0002 to City Council. Commissioner Beaulac stated that he would like to see Multi-Family residential added to the list of residential zones that EPFs could not locate in. Mr. Lamb provided clarification that an identified residential zone should be left as a potential zone for EPFs to locate. Chairman Johnson stated that these are essential services and moving them to a Multi-Family zone will make it more expensive to create these facilities. Commissioner McKinley stated that he is in favor of these facilities moving from the R-1, R-2, and R-3 zones. The vote on the motion was seven in favor, zero against and the motion passed. X. GOOD OF THE ORDER: Commissioner Kelley read a statement regarding core values. He stated the importance of the commissioner's votes during the election of officers and for the comprehensive plan amendments. He asked the commissioners to bring their core values to each meeting. He welcomed the new commissioners to be a part of the conversation. Commissioner Robinson thanked everyone for their patience and stated that although she cannot change her vote on CPA-2020-0007 from the June 25, 2020 meeting but she wishes she could. She provided further information as to why she's reached this decision and going forward she will be in support of the R-4 zone. Commissioner McKinley offered a reminder that tax returns are due Wednesday, July 15, 2020. He also thanked staff for their work on the EPFs. Commissioner Kaschmitter thanked the commission for caring about the community and thanked staff for their patience. Chairman Johnson thanked staff and mentioned that the commission should never question staff's motives. He stated he is in favor of medium density. XI. ADJOURNMENT: Commissioner McKinley made a motion to adjourn the meeting at 6:48 pm. The vote on the motion was seven in favor, zero against, and the motion passed. 3 07-09-2020 Planning Commission Minutes Page 4 of 4 ‘07,,12 V2ee.._4) James ohnson, Chair Date signed (a/L '7Gi_ -)J Deanna Horton, Secretary 4 COMMUNITY AND PUBLIC WORKS ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Spokane STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO THE 0000'Valley' PLANNING COMMISSION CTA-2020-0001 STAFF REPORT DATE: June 11,2020 HEARING DATE AND LOCATION: July 9,2020,beginning at 6:00 p.m.,Spokane Valley City Hall Council Chambers, 10210 East Sprague Avenue, Spokane Valley,Washington 99206. PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: The city initiated code text amendment will amend Chapter 19.180 of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) to clarify the process and criteria to annex adjacent and contiguous areas into the City, and to ensure that the fiscal impacts of providing the facilities, utilities, services,and maintenance of the annexation area are adequately considered prior to annexation. APPROVAL CRITERIA: Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan, SVMC 17.80.150, 19.30.040. SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS: Staff concludes that the proposed amendments to Chapter 19.180 SVMC are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the criteria for review and approval for code text amendments. STAFF CONTACT:Mike Basinger,Economic Development Manager APPLICATION PROCESSING: SVMC Chapter 17.80,Permit Processing Procedures. The following table summarizes the procedural steps for the proposal. Process Date Department of Commerce 60-day Notice May 26,2020 SEPA—DNS Issued May 29,2020 Publish Notice of Public Hearing: June 12 and 19,2020 BACKGROUND: Since the adoption of the Comprehensive Plan in late 2016, the City has received a number of informal inquiries regarding annexation into the City. During these discussions it was determined that the existing policy framework for annexation needed to be bolstered to provide clearer direction to potential applicants and staff regarding annexation requests. In 2019 the City adopted amendments to the Comprehensive Plan that included the following policies and strategy: LU-P 19 Develop criteria to identify,process,and assess the annexation of land into Spokane Valley LU-P20 Identify land designations for potential annexation areas in the Comprehensive Plan for the adjacent Urban Growth Areas to the City CF-P16 Plan and coordinate the location of public facilities and utilities in potential annexation areas, including identifying the fiscal impacts of providing the facilities,utilities, services,and maintenance. Strategy Evaluate and develop criteria to assist in the evaluation of annexations. Staff Report and Recommendation CTA-2020-0001 The proposed amendment to Chapter 19.180 of the SVMC is the implementation measure to achieve the previously adopted Comprehensive Plan policies and strategy. ANALYSIS: Annexation is the procedure for bringing unincorporated areas of a county into an adjacent incorporated city.If an area is annexed,the city becomes the primary provider of local government services.Washington State law as set forth in RCW 35A.14 allows annexations through a variety of mechanisms,including Voter Initiated Election Method, Council Initiated Election Method, Direct Petition Method, Unincorporated Islands, Municipal Purpose; Interlocal Agreement Annexation of Area Served by Fire District(s); and Annexation of Federal Areas.Many of these methods are limited in scope and used by cities infrequently. The most common methods of annexation are further described below: Voter Initiated Election Method -This annexation method is initiated by voters living in the area to be annexed and requires approval of the voters in the proposed annexation area. City Council Initiated Election Method-This annexation method is initiated by a City Council resolution and requires approval of the voters in the proposed annexation area. Direct Petition Method - This annexation method is initiated by property owners (or residents) of the proposed annexation area. This method requires the signatures of (1) property owners representing 60 percent of the assessed value of the area proposed for annexation, or(2) property owners representing a majority of the area proposed for annexation and a majority of the registered voters in the area. Upon receipt of a sufficient petition, City Council adopts an ordinance approving annexation. This is the most common type of annexation. Annexations are limited to areas that are within the Urban Growth Area.The figure below shows the areas in Spokane County that may be available for annexation to the City in yellow. 1 1 :_ , 1 1 _r--irljni.,iit'-, t City of — x 5poka .. _ z _ \ , 4... ll t , . I I r ,.7, . .__ ,, __ e„ __ mn,, WI - even. \\, L iii \ , ■ i 4.1 Municipal Boundaries — =Spokane Valley ll Q Valley VGA 0 ns I M,,., p Page 2 of 4 Staff Report and Recommendation CTA-2020-0001 In addition to the Washington State laws regarding annexation,the proposed amendment will require that all voter-initiated, City Council initiated, and direct petition annexations be subject to the proposed procedures in chapter 19.180 SVMC. Other types of annexations may, but are not required to use the procedures. The proposed annexation procedures and criteria will allow the City to evaluate specific annexation proposals with a set of uniform standards and evaluate the consequences of the annexation on utilities, sanitation, traffic, and law enforcement. The proposed regulations will also allow the City to evaluate the financial impacts of the annexation on providing the required public services at the City's adopted levels of service, including both the costs to provide services and anticipated revenues from the proposed annexation area to support required levels of services. Under the proposed regulations the newly annexed areas will have a Comprehensive Plan and zoning designations of either the Comprehensive Plan or zoning designation as identified in a joint planning process or the closest comparable City Comprehensive Plan and zoning designation. These interim designations and zoning will be evaluated in the next Comprehensive Plan amendment cycle. The proposed amendments to chapter 19.180 SVMC provide a uniform set of criteria that the City would use to evaluate annexation requests. The proposed regulations provide for a set of criteria to fairly and uniformly evaluate annexations,their impacts on existing residents and the ability to serve the new area at adopted levels of service. The regulations also provide a mechanism for the City to evaluate the financial impact of the annexation and mitigate that impact to existing residents. A. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO THE MUNICIPAL CODE TEXT AMENDMENT 1. Compliance with Title 17(General Provisions) of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code a. Findings: SVMC 17.80.150(F)Municipal Code Text Amendment Approval Criteria The City may approve a Municipal Code Text amendment if it finds that: i. The proposed text amendment is consistent with the applicable provisions of the Comprehensive Plan; Staff Analysis: The proposed amendment is supported by the Comprehensive Pan and is consistent with the following policies and strategy: LU-P 19 Develop criteria to identify,process, and assess the annexation of land into Spokane Valley LU-P20 Identify land designations for potential annexation areas in the Comprehensive Plan for the adjacent Urban Growth Areas to the City CF-P 16 Plan and coordinate the location of public facilities and utilities in potential annexation areas, including identifying the fiscal impacts of providing the facilities, utilities, services,and maintenance. Strategy Evaluate and develop criteria to assist in the evaluation of annexations. ii. The proposed amendment bears a substantial relation to public health,safety,welfare, and protection of the environment: Staff Analysis:The proposed amendment bears a substantial relation to public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment. Under the existing provisions for Page 3 of 4 Staff Report and Recommendation CTA-2020-0001 annexation there are no criteria to evaluate annexation requests. The proposed regulations provide guidance to the City, to evaluate the consequences of the annexation on utilities, sanitation, traffic, and law enforcement. The proposed regulations will also allow the City to evaluate the financial impacts of the annexation on providing the required public services at the City's adopted levels of service.This evaluation will analyze the costs to provide services and anticipated revenues from the proposed annexation area to support the required levels of service. Further the regulations provide a clear process for establishing interim comprehensive plan and zoning for any annexed areas. b. Conclusion(s): The proposed text amendment is consistent with the approval criteria contained in the SVMC 17.80.150(F). 2. Finding and Conclusions Specific to Public Comments a. Findings: No public comments have been received to date. b. Conclusion(s): Adequate public noticing was conducted for CTA-2020-0001 in accordance with adopted public noticing procedures. 3. Finding and Conclusions Specific to Agency Comments a. Findings: No agency comments have been received to date. b. Conclusion(s): Comments have been addressed and no concerns noted. B. CONCLUSION The proposed text amendment clarifies the process and criteria to annex adjacent and contiguous areas into the City, and to ensure that the fiscal impacts of providing the facilities,utilities, services, and maintenance of the annexation area are adequately considered prior to annexation. For the reasons set forth in Section A, the proposed code text amendment is found to be consistent the Comprehensive Plan and the requirements of SVMC 17.80.150(F). Page 4 of 4 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: September 8, 2020 Department Director Approval El Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ® new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Second Reading Proposed Ordinance 20-008; 2020 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendments. GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 36.70A, SVMC 17.80.140 and 19.30.010. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: On December 13, 2016, City Council approved Ordinance 16-018 amending the Comprehensive Plan and associated development regulations as required every eight years. On November 19,2019,City Council approved the 2020 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Docket. On August 11, 2020, Council heard an administrative report. On August 25, 2020, Council heard the first reading of proposed Ordinance 20-008 to adopt amendments to the Comprehensive Plan. BACKGROUND:The Growth Management Act allows local jurisdictions to consider amendments to their Comprehensive Plans once each year. The City codified this process in Section 17.80.140 of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code(SVMC).Consistent with state law and the SVMC,staff published notice on August 23 and 30, 2019, advising the public of the annual amendment process and that the City would accept applications for the 2020 cycle through October 31, 2019. The notice was also sent to all agencies, organizations, and adjacent jurisdictions that may have an interest in amending the comprehensive plan. On November 19, 2019, the City Council approved and forwarded the 2020 Docket to the Planning Commission for their review and recommendation. On March 6, 2020, the Planning Commission held a study session on the proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan. A public hearing on the proposed amendments was scheduled for March 26, 2020,but was canceled due to COVID-19 and state mandated regulations concerning holding remote meetings and adherence to prescribed social distancing. The Planning Commission process for the 2020 Comprehensive Plan amendments was restarted with an additional study session on June 11,followed by a public hearing held remotely on June 25,2020. In addition to the minimum legally required notice,the City issued a press release and sent direct emails to the Media,Comp Plan Updates,City News, and City Planning Commission Agenda distribution lists, for a total of 2,104 emails. The City also created a rotating banner on the City's homepage that linked to a webpage about the 2020 Comprehensive Plan Amendments. Finally,the City created and published social media posts on Facebook,Twitter and Linkedln about the public hearing. After the public hearing was closed on June 25,2020,the Planning Commission reviewed and deliberated on each of the proposed CPAs. On July 23, 2020, the Planning Commission voted on the following Findings and Recommendations to the City Council: • The Planning Commission voted 7-0 to forward to City Council a recommendation to approve CPA-2020-0001,CPA-2020-0002, and CPA-2020-0006. • The Planning Commission voted 7-0 to forward to City Council a recommendation to deny CPA- 2020-0003 and CPA-2020-0007. An Administrative Report was presented to City Council on August 11,2020.No public comment was taken at that time. The Council agreed by consensus to have the proposed Ordinance presented for first reading provide for approval of CPA-2020-0001, CPA-2020-0002, CPA-2020-0003, CPA-2020-0006, and CPA- 2020-0007. On August 25, 2020, Council heard the first reading of the proposed Ordinance and moved to 1 of 2 advance the Ordinance to the second reading.The Ordinance under consideration identifies findings that each of the proposed amendments are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan goals and policies,the GMA, and the SVMC. Note that City Council adopted amendments to its Governance Manual that provide that Council will not take public comment on items that have already had a public hearing,such as the Comprehensive Plan amendments presented in proposed Ordinance 20-008. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: None OPTIONS: Move to approve Ordinance No. 20-008 with or without amendments. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to approve Ordinance 20-008,Comprehensive Plan Amendments as proposed. STAFF CONTACT: Mike Basinger,AICP,Economic Development Manager; Chaz Bates,AICP, Senior Planner ATTACHMENTS: Draft Ordinance 20-008 with attachments; Yellow Binder Distributed Separately 2 of 2 DRAFT CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY SPOKANE COUNTY,WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO.20-008 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; AND PROVIDING FOR OTHER MATTERS PROPERLY RELATING THERETO. WHEREAS, through Spokane Valley Ordinance No. 16-018, the City of Spokane Valley adopted the Comprehensive Plan, Capital Facilities Plan, and maps as the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Spokane Valley(the Comprehensive Plan); and WHEREAS, comprehensive plans may be amended annually pursuant to RCW 36.70A.130 of the Growth Management Act(GMA); and WHEREAS, amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan may be initiated by the Planning Commission (Commission),the City Council(Council), citizens, or by the Community and Public Works Director based on citizen requests or when changed conditions warrant adjustments; and WHEREAS,the GMA requires comprehensive plans to be implemented with development regulations, including the zoning of all properties in the City that are consistent with land use map designations; and WHEREAS, the City adopted Public Participation Guidelines to direct the public involvement process for adopting and amending comprehensive plans; and WHEREAS,the Spokane Valley Municipal Code(SVMC)provides that amendment applications shall be received prior to November 1 of each year; and WHEREAS, applications were submitted by the applicant, owner, or by City staff to amend the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map for the purpose of beneficially using the property described herein; and WHEREAS,on November 19,2019,City Council approved the 2020 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Docket; and WHEREAS, on November 25, 2019, the Washington State Department of Commerce was notified pursuant to RCW 36.70A.106 of the City's intent to adopt amendments to the Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the State Environmental Protection Act chapter 43.21C RCW (SEPA) and chapter 21.20 SVMC, staff conducted an environmental review to determine the potential environmental impacts from the proposed amendments;and WHEREAS, on February 21, 2020, after reviewing the environmental checklists, staff issued a Determination of Non-Significance(DNS)for each of the proposals,published the DNS in the Valley News Herald, and where appropriate posted the DNS on the sites and mailed the DNS to all affected public agencies; and WHEREAS, on March 6, 2020 and March 13, 2020, notice of the Commission public hearing was published in the Valley News Herald; and WHEREAS, on March 6, 2020, notice of the Commission hearing had been posted on all the subject properties; and Ordinance 20-008:2020 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Page 1 of 14 DRAFT WHEREAS, on March 6, 2020, the Commission conducted a study session to review the proposed amendments;and WHEREAS,on March 10,2020,notice of the Commission hearing was mailed to all property owners within 400 feet of the subject properties; and WHEREAS, the public hearing scheduled for March 26, 2020 was canceled due to the COVID-19 pandemic and related Proclamations from Governor Inslee limiting social gatherings; and WHEREAS, on May 27, 2020, notice of the Commission hearing was mailed to all property owners within 400 feet of the subject properties; and WHEREAS, on May 27, 2020, notice of the Commission hearing had been posted on all the subject properties; and WHEREAS, on May 29, 2020 and June 5, 2020, notice of the Commission public hearing was published in the Valley News Herald; and WHEREAS, on June 11, 2020, the Commission conducted a study session to review the proposed amendments; and WHEREAS,in addition to the minimum legally required notice,the City issued a press release and sent direct emails to the "Media," "Comp Plan Updates," "City News," and "City Planning Commission Agenda"email distribution lists; and WHEREAS,the City also created a rotating banner on the City's homepage that linked to a webpage about the 2020 Comprehensive Plan Amendments; and WHEREAS,the City created and published social media posts on its Facebook, Twitter and Linkedln accounts about the date,time, and opportunity for public comment at the public hearing; and WHEREAS,on June 25,2020,the Commission received evidence,information,public testimony,and a staff report and recommendation at a public hearing; and WHEREAS, on June 25, 2020, the Commission deliberated and voted to forward CPA-2020-0001, CPA-2020-0002, and CPA-2020-0006, to Council with a recommendation for approval and CPA-2020- 0003 and CPA-2020-0007 to Council with a recommendation for denial,with written findings of fact setting forth the bases for such recommendations to Council; and WHEREAS, on August 11, 2020, Council conducted a briefing to review the proposed amendments; and WHEREAS,on August 11,2020,Council concurred to place CPA-2020-0001,CPA-2020-0002,CPA- 2020-0003,CPA-2020-0006,and CPA-2020-0007 in an ordinance for consideration of approval; and WHEREAS,on August 25,2020, Council considered a first ordinance reading to approve CPA-2020- 0001, CPA-2020-0002, CPA-2020-0003, CPA-2020-0006, and CPA-2020-0007; and Ordinance 20-008:2020 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Page 2 of 14 DRAFT WHEREAS, on September 8, 2020, Council considered a second ordinance reading to adopt the proposed amendments for CPA-2020-0001, CPA-2020-0002, CPA-2020-0003, CPA-2020-0006, and CPA-2020-0007. NOW,THEREFORE,the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley do ordain as follows: Section 1. Purpose. The purpose of this Ordinance is to amend the Comprehensive Plan as described in CPA-2020-0001,CPA-2020-0002, CPA-2020-0003,CPA-2020-0006, and CPA-2020-0007. Section 2. Findings. Council acknowledges that the Commission conducted appropriate investigation and study and held a public hearing on the proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan. Council has read and considered the Commission's findings. Council makes and adopts findings specific to each Comprehensive Plan amendment as set forth in Section 4 below. The Council hereby makes and adopts the following general findings applicable to all proposed amendments: General Findings: 1. On November 25, 2019, the Washington State Department of Commerce was provided a notice of intent to adopt amendments to the Comprehensive Plan. 2. Pursuant to chapter 43.21C RCW (SEPA), environmental checklists were required for each proposed Comprehensive Plan map and text amendment. 3. Staff reviewed the environmental checklists and a threshold determination was made for each proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment. 4. On February 21,2020,Determination ofNon-Significance(DNS)was issued for the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendments. 5. On February 21, 2020, the DNS was published in the City's official newspaper, the Valley News Herald,pursuant to chapter 21.20 SVMC. 6. The procedural requirements of SEPA and Title 21 SVMC have been fulfilled. 7. On May 27, 2020, individual notices of public hearing for the proposed site-specific map amendments were, or had been previously, mailed to all property owners within 400 feet of each affected site. 8. On May 27, 2020 each site subject to a proposed site-specific amendment was, or had been previously,posted with a"Notice of Public Hearing"sign,with a description of the proposal. 9. On May 29, 2020 and June 5, 2020,notice of the Commission public hearing was published in the Valley News Herald. 10. In addition to the minimum legally required notice,the City issued a press release,sent direct emails to the"Media,""Comp Plan Updates,""City News,"and"City Planning Commission Agenda" email distribution lists, and provided notice of the public hearing on the City's Facebook,Twitter,and Linkedln accounts. 11. The procedural requirements in SVMC 17.80.140 for the amendment process, including public participation,notice,and public hearing requirements have been met. Ordinance 20-008:2020 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Page 3 of 14 DRAFT 12. On June, 25, 2020, the Commission held a public hearing on each of the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendments. After receiving public testimony the public hearing was closed. 13. On June 25, 2020,the Commission deliberated and voted to forward CPA-2020-0001, CPA- 2020-0002, and CPA-2020-0006, to Council with a recommendation for approval and CPA- 2020-0003 and CPA-2020-0006 to Council with a recommendation for denial. 14. The Commission adopted findings for CPA-2020-0001, CPA-2020-0002, CPA-2020-0003, CPA-2020-0006, and CPA-2020-0007. Such findings were presented to Council. Specific findings adopted and made by City Council for each Comprehensive Plan Amendment request are contained in Section 4,below. 15. The Commission and Council have reviewed the proposed amendments concurrently to evaluate the cumulative impacts. The review was consistent with the annual amendment process pursuant to SVMC 17.80.140 and chapter 36.70A RCW. 16. The proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan are consistent with GMA and do not result in internal inconsistencies within the Comprehensive Plan itself. Section 3. Property. The properties subject to this Ordinance are described in Attachment"A"(2020 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Maps). Section 4. Comprehensive Plan and Map Amendments. Pursuant to RCW 36.70A.130, the Comprehensive Plan is hereby amended as set forth below and in Attachment"A." The Comprehensive Plan amendments are generally described as follows: Comprehensive Plan and Map Amendments: File No. CPA-2020-0001: Proposal: Request to change the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation from Single Family Residential(SFR)to Corridor Mixed Use (CMU) and to change the Zoning District from Single-Family Residential Urban(R-3)to Corridor Mixed Use (CMU). Applicant: Land Use Solutions and Entitlement, 9101 N Mt View Lane, Spokane,WA 99218. Amendment Location: Parcel number 45152.1004 addressed as 1311 N. McDonald Road, further located in the NW I/4 of Section 15,Township 25 North,Range 44 East,Willamette Meridian,Spokane County,Washington. Council adopts and makes the following Findings for CPA-2020-0001: 1. The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to the public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment. The adopted Comprehensive Plan describes the CMU designation as "allow[ing] for light manufacturing, retail, multifamily, and offices along major transportation corridors. It is primarily used along Sprague Avenue, and the north-south arterials." McDonald Road is an improved north-south Minor Arterial that is consistent with the description of the CMU designation. Additionally, proposed amendment increases office and parking opportunities in the McDonald Road corridor. 2. The proposed amendment is consistent with the requirements of Chapter 36.70A RCW and with the portion of the City's adopted plan not affected by the amendment. The Growth Management Act(GMA)adopts thirteen goals to guide the development of local comprehensive plans and development regulations. The request allows opportunity to Ordinance 20-008:2020 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Page 4 of 14 DRAFT provide an expansion of office use on a designated Minor Arterial with supporting infrastructure. The proposal is consistent with goals of GMA and the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The proposed amendment responds to a substantial change in conditions beyond the property owner's control applicable to the area within which the subject property lies. The two parcels to the south of the proposed amendment were changed from Office to CMU as part of the 2016 legislative update as part of a larger 2016 amendment to eliminate the Office designation,and the owner of the subject property is the same owner of the McDonald Professional Center. 4. The proposed amendment is not in response to or correct an obvious mapping error. 5. The proposed amendment addresses an identified deficiency in the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan has identified the following goals and policies that support increasing employment opportunities while taking advantage of existing supportive infrastructure.The proposed amendment contributes to the long-term success of the City: a. ED-P6 Promote the development or redevelopment of vacant and underutilized properties, particularly those with potential to serve as a catalyst for economic development. b. LU-G2 Provide for land uses that are essential to Spokane Valley residents, employees, and visitors. c. T-G2 Ensure that transportation planning efforts reflect anticipated land use patterns and support identified growth opportunities. 6. The change to CMU will allow for expanded office and office related uses such as parking.The change could result in more intensive development in the future,though the site immediately to the south is vacant and designated and zoned CMU. There is no concern on the effect of the physical environment. 7. There are no known critical areas associated with the site, such as wetlands, fish and wildlife habitat areas, frequently flooded areas or geologically hazardous areas. The parcel is not located within shoreline jurisdiction,and there are no known surface water quality or quantity issues.The City's critical areas ordinance ensures adequate protection of critical areas and stormwater associated with commercial development will be retained and treated on the site. 8. The property is adjacent to CMU to the south and MFR to the east.To the north and west are existing single family homes on SFR designated properties. If approved, the development of the site will be subject to the transitional regulations that will ensure protection of the adjacent homes to the north and south.Potential development consistent with the CMU zone will be compatible with properties to the south and east. The projected impact to the surrounding neighborhood is minimal. Any future development will be evaluated for compliance with all municipal requirements as it relates to adjacent uses at the time of development. 9. McDonald Road is a Minor Arterial and is expected to accommodate the projected change. The projected LOS for McDonald Road in 2040 is A-C, and no mitigations or transportation projects are planned for this section of McDonald Road within the 20-year planning horizon. The subject property and the property immediately to the south are considered infill; the expansion of office in this area is ideal because of the supporting infrastructure that is in place overall impact to the transportation system is minimal. 10. The proposed change would allow the property to support the expansion of the McDonald Professional Center, increasing employment opportunities and growing the City's economy. The change will benefit the City and region by supporting the following adopted Comprehensive Plan goal and policy: a. ED-GI Support economic opportunities and employment growth for Spokane Valley Ordinance 20-008:2020 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Page 5 of 14 DRAFT b. ED-P3 Encourage businesses that provide jobs and grow local markets. 11. The proposal adds approximately 0.5 acres of CMU property to the 1,666 acres of existing CMU designated property within the City.The CMU designation in this location allows for the expansion of an existing office development on the McDonald Road corridor in an area supported by existing infrastructure. The proposal is limited to a reasonable area and if developed under CMU standards the type of use and density would be appropriate for the location. 12. There is one dwelling unit proposed to be removed. While CMU allows residential development, it is not expected that residential development would occur and therefore the City would lose one single family house as a result of the amendment. The change is not expected to have significant impacts to population density in the area. 13. The CMU designation will support the goals and policies identified above.There will be no effect on other elements of the Comprehensive Plan, including Housing, Capital Facilities and Public Services, Public and Private Utilities, Parks and Open Space and Natural Resources. 14. The criteria of SVMC 17.80.140(H)are met by the amendment. Council Decision: Change the designation for parcel number 45152.1004 to Corridor Mixed Use (CMU). File No. CPA-2020-0002: Proposal: Request to change the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation from Industrial (I) to Regional Commercial (RC) and to change the Zoning District from Industrial (I) to Regional Commercial (RC). Applicant: Lawrence B. Stone Properties,PO Box 3949, Spokane,WA 99220. Amendment Location: Parcel number 35133.2321,located north Fancher Road,further located in the SW I/4 of Section 13, Township 25 North, Range 43 East, Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washington. Council adopts and makes the following Findings for CPA-2020-0002: 1. The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to the public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment. The proposed amendment provides the opportunity to aggregate parcels creating greater depth to provide for a larger format structure.Based on the application,the intent is to combine the two Regional Commercial (RC) parcels to the south with the proposal. Both the Industrial(I) and RC designations and zoning districts allow for intensive uses.Providing opportunity for development and redevelopment where there is existing infrastructure has a substantial benefit to public health, safety, and welfare. 2. The proposed amendment is consistent with the requirements of Chapter 36.70A RCW and with the portion of the City's adopted plan not affected by the amendment. The Growth Management Act(GMA)adopts thirteen goals to guide the development of local comprehensive plans and development regulations. The request allows opportunity to aggregate parcels in an area that is already served by supporting infrastructure. The proposal does not conflict with any other GMA goals. The amendment is not in conflict with any other portions of the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The proposed amendment does not respond to a substantial change in conditions beyond the property owner's control applicable to the area within which the subject property lies. 4. The proposed amendment does not correct a mapping error. 5. The proposed amendment addresses an identified deficiency in the Comprehensive Plan. While not identified as a deficiency, the Comprehensive Plan includes the following goals and policies that support increasing employment opportunities while taking advantage of existing supportive infrastructure.The proposed amendment contributes to the long-term success of the City by: Ordinance 20-008:2020 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Page 6 of 14 DRAFT a. ED-GI Support economic opportunities and employment growth for Spokane Valley. b. ED-P6 Promote the development or redevelopment of vacant and underutilized properties, particularly those with potential to serve as a catalyst for economic development. c. LU-G2 Provide for land uses that are essential to Spokane Valley residents, employees, and visitors. d. LU-G3 Support the transformation of commercial, industrial, and mixed-use areas into accessible districts that attract economic activity. e.CF-P2 Optimize the use of existing public facilities before investing in new facilities. 6. The change to RC will allow uses similarly allowed along the Sprague corridor. The change may result in a more people-oriented active use in the area versus a vacant or industrial use, but the intensity would be similar to existing nearby uses. There is no concern on effect of physical environment. 7. There are no known critical areas associated with the site, such as wetlands, fish and wildlife habitat areas, frequently flooded areas or geologically hazardous areas. The parcel is not located within shoreline jurisdiction, and there are no known surface water quality or quantity issues. The City's critical areas ordinance will ensure that adequate protection of critical areas and adjacent land use are addressed when future development occurs and stormwater associated with commercial development will be retained and treated on the site. 8. The property is adjacent to RC to the west and south; and Ito the north and east. To the north are existing industrial developments and users.To the south is a vacant used motor vehicle sales lot that is under the same ownership. To the west is Home Depot. The projected impact to the surrounding neighborhood is minimal. Any future development will be evaluated for compliance with all municipal requirements as it relates to adjacent uses at the time of development. 9. Sprague Avenue is a Principal Arterial and is expected to accommodate the projected change.The 20-year Transportation Improvement Plan identifies a concrete intersection at Sprague and Fancher by 2039. The existing and projected LOS for this segment of Sprague Avenue is D within City's adopted standard.Additionally,the change from Ito RC is expected to have a minimal impact to the transportation network and other utilities. 10. The proposed change would allow the property to be combined with the two properties fronting Sprague Avenue, increasing employment opportunities and growing the city's economy. The change benefits the neighborhood, City, and region by supporting the following adopted Comprehensive Plan goals and policies: a. ED-GI Support economic opportunities and employment growth for Spokane Valley. b. ED-P6 Promote the development or redevelopment of vacant and underutilized properties, particularly those with potential to serve as a catalyst for economic development. c. LU-G2 Provide for land uses that are essential to Spokane Valley residents, employees, and visitors. d. LU-G3 Support the transformation of commercial, industrial, and mixed-use areas into accessible districts that attract economic activity. e. CF-P2 Optimize the use of existing public facilities before investing in new facilities. 11. The proposal would add approximately three acres of RC property to the 809 acres of existing RC designated property within the City. As of 2018, there are approximately 111 acres of vacant RC property within the City.The amendment allows for commercial Ordinance 20-008:2020 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Page 7 of 14 DRAFT development on the Sprague Avenue corridor in an area supported by existing infrastructure. The proposal is limited to a reasonable area and if developed under RC standards the type of use and density will be appropriate for the location. 12. Under the existing conditions the subject property is a paved vacant lot. It appears the property was used in conjunction with the RC designated property to the south for used motor vehicle sales,which is presently vacant. The change of the property from Ito RC will not impact current or projected population density in the area. 13. The RC designation will support the goals and policies identified above. It would have very little to no effect on other elements of the Comprehensive Plan,including Housing, Capital Facilities and Public Services,Public and Private Utilities,Parks and Open Space and Natural Resources. 14. The criteria of SVMC 17.80.140(H)are met by the amendment. Council Decision: Change the designation for parcel number 35133.2321 to Regional Commercial (RC). File No. CPA-2020-0003: Proposal: Request to change the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation from Multifamily Residential(MFR)to Corridor Mixed Use(CMU)and to change the Zoning District from Multifamily Residential(MFR)to Corridor Mixed Use(CMU). Applicant: Jay Rambo,PO Box 212011, Spokane Valley,WA 99214. Amendment Location: Parcel numbers 45094.0133,45094.0134, and 45094.0121 addressed as 1723 and 1724 N Union Road,further located in the SE'/4 of Section 09,Township 25 North,Range 44 East, Willamette Meridian, Spokane County,Washington. Council adopts and makes the following Findings for CPA-2020-0003: 1. The proposed amendment changing the land use designation from Multiple Family Residential to(MFR)to Corridor Mixed Use(CMU)has a substantial relationship to the public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment. The adopted Comprehensive Plan describes the CMU designation as "allow[ing] for light manufacturing,retail,multifamily, and offices along major transportation corridors. It is primarily used along Sprague Avenue, and the north-south arterials." The subject properties are between CMU properties to the west, east, and south. Access is provided by Union Road via Mission Avenue.Mission Ave is a Minor Arterial.Changing the land use designation to CMU increases the flexibility of allowed uses and allowed density on the sites in an area with supportive infrastructure, which has benefit to public health, safety, and welfare. 2. The proposed amendment is consistent with the requirements of Chapter 36.70A RCW and with the portion of the City's adopted plan not affected by the amendment. The Growth Management Act(GMA)adopts thirteen goals to guide the development of local comprehensive plans and development regulations. The request allows opportunity to expand the multiple family development on the site and the opportunity to provide the neighborhood with access to daily goods and services in a centralized area with adequate public facilities;there are two projects in the 6-year TIP along Mission Avenue just south of this area to improve capacity. The proposal does not conflict with any other GMA goals. The amendment is not in conflict with any other portions of the comprehensive plan. 3. The proposed amendment does not respond to a substantial change in conditions beyond the property owner's control applicable to the area within which the subject property lies. While the amendment does not respond directly to a substantial change in conditions beyond the owner's control, the 2016 legislative update to the Comprehensive Plan eliminated the Office designation generally replacing it with the CMU designation, which was the case for the parcels to the west, east, and south. While the 2016 plan Ordinance 20-008:2020 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Page 8 of 14 DRAFT changed the designation of the surrounding vacant lands from Office to CMU, the properties subject to the amendment request had a multiple family development and the designation of Multiple Family was not changed. The CMU designation provides more flexibility than the Office and Multiple Family designations. The changing of the surrounding properties from Office to CMU created a situation whereby the subject properties may not use their property to the similarly situated properties to the west,east, and south. 4. The amendment is not in response to a mapping error and would not correct any error. 5. The proposed amendment addresses an identified deficiency in the Comprehensive Plan. Changing the designation from MFR to CMU on an existing developed parcel provides the opportunity to increase density on developed parcels using pre-existing infrastructure and provide flexibility to add service retail oriented to the area that may be supported by the multiple family housing. The Comprehensive Plan identifies the following goals and policies that support the proposed change: a. LU-GI Maintain and enhance the character and quality of life in Spokane Valley. b. LU-P16 Maximize the density of development along major transit corridors and near transit centers and commercial areas. c.H-GI Allow for a broad range of housing opportunities to meet the needs of the community. d.H-G3 Allow convenient access to daily goods and services in Spokane Valley's neighborhoods. e.CF-P2 Optimize the use of existing public facilities before investing in new facilities. 6. The change to CMU will allow existing uses as well as commercial, office and higher residential development of the properties. The properties will have the opportunity to transition, add density and a mix of uses to serve the surrounding neighborhood. There is no concern on effect of physical environment. 7. The effect on open space, streams, rivers and lakes is minimal. There are no known critical areas associated with the site, such as wetlands, fish and wildlife habitat areas, frequently flooded areas or geologically hazardous areas. The parcels are not located within shoreline jurisdiction, and there are no known surface water quality or quantity issues. 8. The CMU zone is compatible and will have little impact on adjacent land uses and surrounding neighborhoods. The 6.25-acre site is currently developed with a multiple family development and a one single family home.The adjacent use to the south is single family,to the west self-storage,to the east office,multiple family and vacant CMU. The CMU land use designation surrounds the amendment site to the west, east, and north. Potential development consistent with the CMU zone will be compatible with properties to the west, east, and south, and transitional regulations will protect the single family zone to the north. 9. The subject properties are considered infill development, as such, the expansion of allowed uses and increased densities are supported by community facilities and infrastructure that is in place.Mission Avenue is a Minor Arterial.There are two projects in the 6-year TIP along Mission Avenue just south of this area, one of which is the intersection capacity improvement and signal modification at Pines/Mission. Site- specific improvements and their impact to this project would be identified through the development review process, and development on the parcels within the Mirabeau Subarea Study area. 10. The proposed change would allow the property to increase density and support infill development in an area planned for growth. The change may support increased housing opportunities, office, employment, or access to daily goods and services. The change Ordinance 20-008:2020 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Page 9 of 14 DRAFT benefits the neighborhood, city, and region by supporting the following adopted Comprehensive Plan goal and policy: a. ED-G1 Support economic opportunities and employment growth for Spokane Valley. b. ED-P3 Encourage businesses that provide jobs and grow local markets. 11. The proposal would add approximately 6.5 acres of CMU property to the 1,666 acres of existing CMU designated property within the city. The CMU designation in this place would allow for increased options for development including increased density and retail services that may serve multiple family development. The proposal is limited to a reasonable area and if developed under CMU standards the type of use and density would be appropriate for the location. 12. The current designation and zoning is MFR which has a density maximum of 22 dwelling units per acre. While CMU allows unlimited density, actual densities in the CMU are generally consistent with those in the MFR designation and zoning. The change is not expected to have significant impacts to the planned population density in the area. 13. The CMU designation will support the goals and policies identified above.It would have very little to no effect on other elements of the Comprehensive Plan,including Housing, Capital Facilities and Public Services,Public and Private Utilities,Parks and Open Space and Natural Resources. 14. The criteria of SVMC 17.80.140(H)are met by the amendment. Council Decision: Change the designation for parcel numbers 45094.0133, 45094.0134, and 45094.0121 to Corridor Mixed Use(CMU). File No.: CPA-2020-0006 Proposal: Request to change the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation from Industrial (I) to Corridor Mixed Use (CMU) and to change the Zoning District from Industrial (I) to Corridor Mixed Use (CMU). Applicant: City of Spokane Valley, 10210 East Sprague Avenue, Spokane Valley,WA 99206. Amendment Location: Parcel number 45013.9024 addressed as 3830 N Sullivan, further located in the SW I/4 of Section 01, Township 25 North, Range 44 East, Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washington. Council adopts and makes the following Findings for CPA-2020-0006: 1. The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to the public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment. The proposed amendment provides more flexibility of uses on a property allowing East Valley School District(EVSD)to broaden and enhance their educational service mission. Under the Industrial zone educational activities are limited to professional, vocational and trade schools. While this may continue to be an essential component to EVSD curriculum,flexibility is needed to meet existing and future demand for other educational services. Changing the designation to Corridor Mixed Use (CMU), increases the allowed types of educational services legally permitted to occur in the existing facility. Increasing educational opportunities to local youth has a substantial benefit to public health, safety, and welfare. 2. The proposed amendment is consistent with the requirements of Chapter 36.70A RCW and with the portion of the City's adopted plan not affected by the amendment. The Growth Management Act(GMA)adopts thirteen goals to guide the development of local comprehensive plans and development regulations. The request allows opportunity to strengthen EVSD mission to provide for education of local youth in an area with adequate public facilities. The proposal does not conflict with any other GMA goals. The amendment is not in conflict with any other portions of the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The amendment does respond to a substantial change in demographic conditions from 2016 legislative update to the Comprehensive Plan. EVSD has experienced changes in Ordinance 20-008:2020 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Page 10 of 14 DRAFT enrollment and interest in vocational education, under the existing I designation only professional,vocational and trade schools are allowed changing the designation to CMU allows EVSD to adapt the educational services they provide in a location they own and have made substantial improvements for educational purposes. The demographic and interest shifts are beyond EVSD control the proposed change allows them to continue to serve district educational needs. 4. The proposed text amendments do not correct a mapping error. 5. The proposed amendment addresses an identified deficiency in the Comprehensive Plan. While not directly identified as a deficiency,the Comprehensive Plan has identified the following goal and policy that support workforce development and education,which are integral to the long-term success of the City: a. ED-G5 Support and encourage the development of a strong workforce that is globally competitive and responds to the changing needs of the workplace b.ED-P16 Support local educational institutions in the development of educational and training programs that meet the needs of businesses. 6. The change to CMU will allow existing uses as well as more expanded educational uses. The change could result in more intensive development in the future,though the site is currently developed.There is no concern on effect of physical environment. 7. There are no known critical areas associated with the site, such as wetlands, fish and wildlife habitat areas, frequently flooded areas or geologically hazardous areas. The parcel is not located within shoreline jurisdiction,and there are no known surface water quality or quantity issues. The City's critical areas ordinance will ensure that adequate protection of the critical areas and adjacent land use are addressed should future development occur. 8. The property is generally surrounded by Spokane Industrial Park to the north and east; however, the property is not part of the Spokane Industrial Park. The property to the south is designated and zoned CMU. The institutional use on the proposed site is generally compatible with both the light industrial uses to the north and east and the retail service uses to the south. The projected impact to the surrounding neighborhoods is minimal. Any future development will be evaluated for compliance with all municipal requirements as it relates to adjacent uses at the time of development. 9. B Street is a local access street and Sullivan Road is a Principal Arterial. There are two capacity related projects in the 6-year TIP near the project area:intersection improvement at Sullivan and Wellesley and improvement to Sullivan and SR 290(Trent)interchange. The subject property are considered infill development,as such,the expansion of allowed uses and increased densities are supported by the infrastructure that is in place. 10. The proposed change would allow the property and structure owned by EVSD to be used for educational purposes beyond professional,vocational and trade school use,increasing the school district's ability to provide educational services. The change benefits the neighborhood, City,and region. 11. The proposal would add approximately 9 acres of CMU property to the 1,666 acres of existing CMU designated property within the City. While additional demand for CMU property may be limited, the CMU designation allows for additional educational uses, which has been indicated as needed from EVSD. The proposal is limited to a reasonable area and if developed under CMU standards the type of use and density would be appropriate for the location. 12. Under the existing conditions and the Industrial designation there is very little population that resides in the area. While CMU allows residential development, it is not expected that residential development would occur. The proposed change in land use designation is not expected to have significant impacts to population density in the area. Ordinance 20-008:2020 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Page 11 of 14 DRAFT 13. The CMU designation will support the goal and policy identified above. It would have very little to no effect on other elements of the Comprehensive Plan,including Land Use, Transportation, and Housing, Capital Facilities and Public Services, Public and Private Utilities,Parks and Open Space and Natural Resources. 14. The criteria of SVMC 17.80.140(H)are met by the amendment. Council Decision: Change the designation for parcel number 45013.9024 to Corridor Mixed Use (CMU). File No. CPA-2020-0007: Proposal: Amend Chapter 2 Goals and Policies to provide policy guidance for increased housing density with access to support services like transit and commercial services;and provide implementing regulations. Applicant: City of Spokane Valley, 10210 East Sprague Avenue, Spokane Valley,WA 99206. Amendment Location: Applies citywide. Council adopts and makes the following Findings for CPA-2020-0007: 1. The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to the public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment. Housing is an important component of the economic infrastructure of the city.Ensuring that there is a variety of housing types is an important competitive advantage for economic development. The proposed amendment will allow the City to more closely align its housing needs with locations within the City to ensure adequate infrastructure is available. This will also enable the provision of quality,affordable housing for all Spokane Valley residents. 2. The proposed amendment is consistent with the requirements of Chapter 36.70A RCW and with the portion of the City's adopted plan not affected by the amendment. The Growth Management Act(GMA)adopts thirteen goals to guide the development of local comprehensive plans and development regulations. The GMA provides that the housing element serves to encourage the availability of affordable housing to residents of all economic backgrounds,promote a variety of residential densities and housing types,and encourage the preservation of existing neighborhoods. The proposed amendment will provide increased housing options in locations that have adequate infrastructure that can affordably support increased densities. 3. The proposed amendment responds to a substantial change in conditions beyond the property owner's control applicable to the area within which the subject property lies. The amendment is not related to a specific piece of property. It does respond to a substantial change in conditions from 2016 legislative update to the Comprehensive Plan. This change relates to increased duplex development in neighborhoods with larger lots as a result of the 2016 legislative update.This amendment looks to incentivize alternative housing development where there is frequent transit and commercial services. 4. The proposed amendment is not in response to or corrects an obvious mapping error. 5. The proposed amendment addresses an identified deficiency in the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan identifies that the City will need an additional 6,389 homes by 2037 (3,962 single family homes and 2,417 multifamily). The plan also identifies that the median household income in the City was approximately$2,000 less than the average countywide annual earnings. Additional data indicates that residents are cost-burdened with 51% of renters and 26% of homeowners spending at least 33 percent of their monthly budget on rent or mortgage payments. The following adopted goals, policies, and strategy support the proposed amendment: a.H-GI Allow for a broad range of housing opportunities to meet the needs of the community. b.H-G2 Enable the development of affordable housing for all income levels. c. Strategy: Continue to evaluate new housing typologies to meet market needs. Ordinance 20-008:2020 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Page 12 of 14 DRAFT 6. The proposed amendment is policy oriented and as a non-site specific amendment does not have a direct effect on the physical environment.Future development that may result will be evaluated under city regulations for physical development. 7. The proposed amendment is policy oriented and does not have a direct effect on open space, streams, rivers and lakes. The City's critical areas ordinance will ensure that adequate protection of critical areas and adjacent land use are addressed should future development occur. 8. The proposed amendment is policy oriented and includes implementing development regulations that are aimed to protect neighborhood character and locate alternative housing in areas with frequent transit and commercial services. 9. Capital Facilities Policy CF-P6 recommends that facilities and services meet minimum Level of Service (LOS) Standards. LOS standards have been adopted for water, sewer, transportation, stormwater, law enforcement, libraries, parks, street cleaning, public transit, fire, and schools. The proposed amendment seeks to take advantage of available infrastructure to minimize the need to develop and maintain new infrastructure. 10 Increasing housing options that protect neighborhood character and minimize the need for new infrastructure can potentially reduce housing costs and thereby reducing the amount of city residents paying more than 33 percent of their income toward housing, which would benefit the neighborhood, city and region. The change benefits the neighborhood, City, and region by supporting the following adopted Comprehensive Plan goal and policy: a. ED-P8 Provide and maintain an infrastructure system that supports Spokane Valley's economic development priorities. b. LU-G1 Maintain and enhance the character and quality of life in Spokane Valley. c. LU-G4 Ensure that land use plans,regulations,review processes,and infrastructure improvements support economic growth and vitality d. LU-P14 Enable a variety of housing types. e. LU-P16 Maximize the density of development along major transit corridors and near transit centers and commercial areas. f.H-G3 Allow convenient access to daily goods and services in Spokane Valley's neighborhoods. 11. The proposed amendment does not change the location or quantity of land designations. Implementing changes to the zoning code may increase densities in locations with adequate infrastructure support, and may reduce densities in other locations. Any future change would be consistent with the adopted Comprehensive Plan and the demand forecasted. 12. The implementing regulations may increase density in areas that are supported by adequate infrastructure and may reduce densities in other locations. The proposed amendment is not expected to have significant impacts to population density on a citywide level. Implementing regulations will be consistent with the adopted Comprehensive Plan and the demand forecasted. 13. The proposed amendment will support the Comprehensive Plan's housing goals,policies, and strategies. The amendment will not have a direct impact on other Comprehensive Plan elements. Implementing regulations will be consistent with the adopted Comprehensive Plan and the demand forecast. 14. The criteria of SVMC 17.80.140(H)are met by the amendment. Council Decision:Amend the Comprehensive Plan as identified in CPA-2020-0007. Section 5. Map - Copies on File-Administrative Action. The Comprehensive Plan (with maps) is maintained in the office of the City Clerk as well as the City Department of Community and Public Works. The City Manager or designee, following adoption of this Ordinance, is authorized to modify the Ordinance 20-008:2020 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Page 13 of 14 DRAFT Comprehensive Plan (including maps) in a manner consistent with this Ordinance, including correcting scriveners errors. Section 6. Liability. The express intent of the City is that the responsibility for compliance with the provisions of this Ordinance shall rest with the permit applicant and their agents. This Ordinance and its provisions are adopted with the express intent to protect the health,safety,and welfare of the general public and are not intended to protect any particular class of individuals or organizations. Section 7. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause,or phrase of this Ordinance shall be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause, or phrase of this Ordinance. Section 8. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect five days after publication of this Ordinance or a summary thereof in the official newspaper of the City as provided by law. PASSED by the City Council this day of September,2020. ATTEST: Ben Wick,Mayor Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Approved as to form: Office of the City Attorney Date of Publication: Effective Date: Ordinance 20-008:2020 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Page 14 of 14 Attachment A: Ordinance 20-008 Comprehensive Plan Map Study Are] E Sinto Ave 0 0 z Legend CMU NC E Sharp Ave I POS IMU RC MF SF MU v T I I CPA-2020-0001 Request: Sikilian#se\a' Owner: Tucker Roy LLC Proposed change: Land Use Parcel#: 45152.1004 designation from SFR to CMU *Valley Address: 1311 N McDonald Rd and Zoning from R3 to CMU Comprehensive Plan Map -, E Nixon Ave 0 a 1111 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1--„, �E-Main-Ave I -.., •• P4 Study Area U ct w z I / AIM qo w� E Sprague Ave �— qo wz Legend U CMU NC w c I POS IMU RC i MF SF MU CPA-2020-0002 Request: *Mime Lawrence B StoneProposed change: Land Use designation Owner: Properties#50 LLC from Ito RC and Zoning from Ito RC .000 Valley Parcel#: 35133.2321 Address: N Fancher Rd Comprehensive Plan Map 1111. E Montgomery Ave E 190 W 289 On Ramp E I 90 Fwy E I 90 Fwy Study Area E I 90 E289 OFF Ra ,. liäTve -.717— IIIM i= :z z L E Mission Aye I 1 1 • Legend _ Eli CMU NC — POS -41MI IMU MI RC E Maxwell Ave MF SF — MU [ CPA-2020-0003 Request: Spo Of kane Owner: Revere-Dece III LC Proposed change: Land Use Revere-Dece 20202 Bu Building Owner LLC 40000 ill Properties LL designation from MF to CMU ValleY Parcel#: Br450940133C.0134,.0121 and Zoning from MF to CMU Address: 1723/1724 N Union Rd Comprehensive Plan Map Study Are] E^Industrial Via:St cip F�1 E Kiernan Ave y 3 Industrial Park B St r -d I- Legend CMU Me NC � I Er POS IMU RC MF SF MU I I CPA-2020-0006 Request: Sp"""' Owner: East ValleySchool okane Proposed change: Land Use District#361 designation from Ito CMU .000 Valley Parcel#: 45013.9024 and Zoning from Ito CMU Address: 3830 N Sullivan Rd CPA-2020-0007 (City Initiated Text Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan) On page 2-27 of the 2017-2037 Comprehensive Plan, add the following policies: H-P5 Enable a variety of housing types at increased densities within 'z mile of funded high performance transit networks. H-P6 Preserve and enhance the city's established single-family neighborhoods by minimizing the impacts of more dense housing typologies such as duplexes and cottage development. CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: September 8, 2020 Department Director Approval El Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ® new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Second Reading Proposed Ordinance 20-009, for 2020 Zoning map and development regulation amendments GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 36.70A, SVMC 17.80.140; SVMC 17.80.150; and SVMC 19.30.010 PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: On December 13, 2016,City Council approved Ordinance 16-018 amending the Comprehensive Plan and associated development regulations as required every eight years. On November 19,2019,City Council approved the 2020 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Docket. On August 11, 2020, Council heard an administrative report. On August 25, 2020, Council heard the first reading of proposed Ordinance 20-009 to adopt amendments to the Zoning Map and development regulations. BACKGROUND:The Growth Management Act allows local jurisdictions to consider amendments to their Comprehensive Plans once each year. The City codified this process in Section 17.80.140 of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code(SVMC). Further,the City has adopted regulations for adoption of amendments to Titles 17-24 of the SVMC pursuant to SVMC 17.80.150. Consistent with state law and the SVMC, staff published notice on August 23 and 30,2019,advising the public of the annual amendment process and that the City would accept applications for the 2020 cycle through October 31, 2019. The notice was also sent to all agencies, organizations, and adjacent jurisdictions that may have an interest in amending the comprehensive plan. On November 19, 2019, the City Council approved and forwarded the 2020 Docket to the Planning Commission for their review and recommendation. On March 6, 2020, the Planning Commission held a study session on the proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan. A public hearing on the proposed amendments was scheduled for March 26, 2020, but was canceled due to COVID-19 and state mandated regulations concerning holding remote meetings and adherence to prescribed social distancing. The Planning Commission process for the 2020 Comprehensive Plan amendments was restarted with an additional study session on June 11, followed by a public hearing held remotely on June 25,2020. In addition to the minimum legally required notice,the City issued a press release and sent direct emails to the Media,Comp Plan Updates,City News, and City Planning Commission Agenda distribution lists, for a total of 2,104 emails. The City also created a rotating banner on the City's homepage that linked to a webpage about the 2020 Comprehensive Plan Amendments. Finally,the City created and published social media posts on Facebook,Twitter and Linkedln about the public hearing. After the public hearing was closed on June 25,2020,the Planning Commission reviewed and deliberated on each of the proposed CPAs. On July 23, 2020, the Planning Commission voted on the following Findings and Recommendations to the City Council: • The Planning Commission voted 7-0 to forward to City Council a recommendation to approve CPA-2020-0001, CPA-2020-0002 and CPA-2020-0006. • The Planning Commission voted 7-0 to forward to City Council a recommendation to deny CPA- 2020-0003 and CPA-2020-0007. 1 of 2 An Administrative Report was presented to City Council on August 11,2020.No public comment was taken at that time. The Council agreed by consensus to have the proposed Ordinance presented for first reading provide for approval of CPA-2020-0001, CPA-2020-0002, CPA-2020-0003, CPA-2020-0006, and CPA- 2020-0007. On August 25, 2020, Council heard the first reading of the proposed Ordinance and moved to advance the Ordinance to the second reading.The draft Ordinance under consideration identifies findings that each of the proposed amendments are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan goals and policies,the GMA, and the SVMC. Note that City Council adopted amendments to its Governance Manual that provide that Council will not take public comment on items that have already had a public hearing, such as the zoning map and implementing development regulations presented in proposed Ordinance 20-009. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS:None OPTIONS: Move to aprove the Ordinance No. 20-009 with or without amendments. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to approve Ordinance 20-009, Official Zoning Amendments. STAFF CONTACT: Mike Basinger,AICP,Economic Development Manager; Chaz Bates,AICP, Senior Planner ATTACHMENTS: Draft Ordinance 20-009 with attachments; Yellow Binder Distributed Separately 2 of 2 DRAFT CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY SPOKANE COUNTY,WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO.20-009 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP AND ADOPTING IMPLEMENTING REGULATIONS AS DESCRIBED IN CPA-2020-0001, CPA-2020-0002, CPA- 2020-0003, CPA-2020-0006, AND CPA-2020-0007; AND PROVIDING FOR OTHER MATTERS PROPERLY RELATING THERETO. WHEREAS,the City of Spokane Valley(City)adopted the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) and the Official City Zoning Map pursuant to Ordinance No. 16-018, on December 13,2016(the Official City Zoning Map); and WHEREAS,the SVMC and Official City Zoning Map became effective on December 28,2016;and WHEREAS, comprehensive plans may be amended annually pursuant to RCW 36.70A.130 of the Growth Management Act(GMA); and WHEREAS, amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan may be initiated by the Planning Commission (Commission),the City Council(Council), citizens, or by the Community and Public Works Director based on citizen requests or when changed conditions warrant adjustments; and WHEREAS,the GMA requires comprehensive plans to be implemented with development regulations, including the zoning of all properties in the City that are consistent with land use map designations; and WHEREAS, zone changes under consideration with the annual Comprehensive Plan amendments are to be considered as area-wide rezones pursuant to SVMC 17.80.140;and WHEREAS, consistent with the GMA, the City adopted Public Participation Guidelines to direct the public involvement process for adopting and amending comprehensive plans and area-wide rezones; and WHEREAS,the Spokane Valley Municipal Code(SVMC)provides that amendment applications shall be received prior to November 1 of each year; and WHEREAS, applications were submitted by the applicant, owner, or by City staff to amend the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map for the purpose of beneficially using the property described herein; and WHEREAS,on November 19,2019,City Council approved the 2020 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Docket; and WHEREAS, on November 25, 2019, the Washington State Department of Commerce was notified pursuant to RCW 36.70A.106 of the City's intent to adopt amendments to the Comprehensive Plan and implementing development regulations and zoning map amendments; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the State Environmental Protection Act chapter 43.21C RCW (SEPA) and chapter 21.20 SVMC, staff conducted an environmental review to determine the potential environmental impacts from the proposed amendments; and Ordinance 20-009, 2020 Zoning Map and Code Amendments Page 1 of 14 DRAFT WHEREAS, on February 21, 2020, after reviewing the environmental checklists, staff issued a Determination of Non-Significance(DNS)for each of the proposals,published the DNS in the Valley News Herald, and where appropriate posted the DNS on the sites and mailed the DNS to all affected public agencies; and WHEREAS, on March 6, 2020 and March 13, 2020, notice of the Commission public hearing was published in the Valley News Herald; and WHEREAS, on March 6, 2020, notice of the Commission hearing had been posted on all the subject properties; and WHEREAS, on March 6, 2020, the Commission conducted a study session to review the proposed amendments; and WHEREAS,on March 10,2020,notice of the Commission hearing was mailed to all property owners within 400 feet of the subject properties; and WHEREAS, the scheduled public hearing on March 26, 2020 was canceled due to COVID-19 and efforts to maximize social distancing, and WHEREAS, on May 27, 2020, notice of the Commission hearing was mailed to all property owners within 400 feet of the subject properties; and WHEREAS, on May 27, 2020, notice of the Commission hearing had been posted on all the subject properties; and WHEREAS, on May 29, 2020 and June 5, 2020, notice of the Commission public hearing was published in the Valley News Herald; and WHEREAS, on June 11, 2020, the Commission conducted a study session to review the proposed amendments; and WHEREAS,in addition to the minimum legally required notice,the City issued a press release and sent direct emails to the "Media," "Comp Plan Updates," "City News," and "City Planning Commission Agenda"email distribution lists; and WHEREAS,the City also created a rotating banner on the City's homepage that linked to a webpage about the 2020 Comprehensive Plan Amendments; and WHEREAS,the City created and published social media posts on its Facebook,Twitter and Linkedln accounts about the date,time, and opportunity for public comment at the public hearing; and WHEREAS,on June 25,2020,the Commission received evidence,information,public testimony,and a staff report and recommendation at a public hearing; and WHEREAS, on June 25, 2020, the Commission deliberated and voted to forward CPA-2020-0001, CPA-2020-0002, and CPA-2020-0006, to Council with a recommendation for approval and CPA-2020- 0003 and CPA-2020-0007 to Council with a recommendation for denial,with written findings of fact setting forth the bases for such recommendations to Council; Ordinance 20-009, 2020 Zoning Map and Code Amendments Page 2 of 14 DRAFT WHEREAS, on August 11, 2020, Council conducted a briefing to review the proposed amendments; and WHEREAS,on August 11,2020,Council concurred to place CPA-2020-0001,CPA-2020-0002,CPA- 2020-0003,CPA-2020-0006,and CPA-2020-0007,in an ordinance for consideration of approval; and WHEREAS, on August 25,2020, Council considered a first ordinance reading to approve CPA-2020- 0001,CPA-2020-0002, CPA-2020-0003, CPA-2020-0006, and CPA-2020-0007; and WHEREAS, on September 8, 2020, Council considered a second ordinance reading to adopt the proposed amendments for CPA-2020-0001, CPA-2020-0002, CPA-2020-0003, CPA-2020-0006, and CPA-2020-0007. NOW,THEREFORE,the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley do ordain as follows: Section 1. Purpose. The purpose of this Ordinance is to amend the Official City Zoning Map and adopt implementing development regulations as described in CPA-2020-0001, CPA-2020-0002, CPA- 2020-0003, CPA-2020-0006 and CPA-2020-0007. Section 2. Findings. Council acknowledges that the Commission conducted appropriate investigation and study and held a public hearing on the proposed amendments to the Official City Zoning Map and Spokane Valley Municipal Code. Council has read and considered the Commission's findings. Council makes and adopts findings specific to each Comprehensive Plan amendment as set forth in Section 4 below. The Council hereby makes and adopts the following general findings applicable to all proposed amendments: General Findings: 1. On November 25, 2019, the Washington State Department of Commerce was provided a notice of intent to adopt amendments to the Comprehensive Plan. 2. Pursuant to chapter 43.21C RCW (SEPA), environmental checklists were required for each proposed Comprehensive Plan map and text amendment. 3. Staff reviewed the environmental checklists and a threshold determination was made for each proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment. 4. On February 21,2020,Determination ofNon-Significance(DNS)was issued for the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendments. 5. On February 21, 2020, the DNS was published in the City's official newspaper, the Valley News Herald,pursuant to chapter 21.20 SVMC. 6. The procedural requirements of SEPA and Title 21 SVMC have been fulfilled. 7. On May 27, 2020, individual notices of public hearing for the proposed site-specific map amendments were, or had been previously, mailed to all property owners within 400 feet of each affected site. 8. On May 27, 2020 each site subject to a proposed site-specific amendment was, or had been previously,posted with a"Notice of Public Hearing" sign,with a description of the proposal. Ordinance 20-009, 2020 Zoning Map and Code Amendments Page 3 of 14 DRAFT 9. On May 29, 2020 and June 5, 2020, notice of the Commission public hearing was published in the Valley News Herald 10. In addition to the minimum legally required notice,the City issued a press release,sent direct emails to the"Media,""Comp Plan Updates,""City News,"and"City Planning Commission Agenda" email distribution lists, and provided notice of the public hearing on the City's Facebook,Twitter,and LinkedIn accounts. 11. The procedural requirements in SVMC 17.80.140 for the amendment process, including public participation,notice,and public hearing requirements have been met. 12. On June, 25, 2020, the Commission held a public hearing on each of the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendments. After receiving public testimony the public hearing was closed. 13. On June 25, 2020,the Commission deliberated and voted to forward CPA-2020-0001, CPA- 2020-0002, and CPA-2020-0006, to Council with a recommendation for approval and CPA- 2020-0003 and CPA-2020-0007 to Council with a recommendation for denial. 14. The Commission adopted findings for CPA-2020-0001, CPA-2020-0002, CPA-2020-0003, CPA-2020-0006, and CPA-2020-0007. Such findings were presented to Council. Specific findings adopted and made by City Council for each Comprehensive Plan Amendment request are contained in Section 4,below. 15. The Commission and Council have reviewed the proposed amendments concurrently to evaluate the cumulative impacts. The review was consistent with the annual amendment process pursuant to SVMC 17.80.140 and chapter 36.70A RCW. 16. The proposed amendments to the Official City Zoning Map and Spokane Valley Municipal Code are consistent with GMA and do not result in internal inconsistencies within the Comprehensive Plan itself. Section 3. Property. The properties subject to this Ordinance are described in Attachment"A"(2020 Official City Zoning Amendment Maps). Section 4. Map Amendments. Pursuant to RCW 36.70A.130,the Official City Zoning Map is hereby amended as set forth below and in Attachment "A" (Maps). The Zoning Map amendments are generally described as follows: Map Amendments: File No. CPA-2020-0001: Proposal: Request to change the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation from Single Family Residential(SFR)to Corridor Mixed Use(CMU)and to change the Zoning District from Single Family Residential Urban(R-3)to Corridor Mixed Use (CMU). Applicant: Land Use Solutions and Entitlement, 9101 N Mt View Lane, Spokane,WA 99218. Amendment Location: Parcel number 45152.1004 addressed as 1311 N. McDonald Road, further located in the NW I/4 of Section 15,Township 25 North,Range 44 East,Willamette Meridian,Spokane County,Washington. Council adopts and makes the following Findings for CPA-2020-0001: Ordinance 20-009, 2020 Zoning Map and Code Amendments Page 4 of 14 DRAFT 1. The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to the public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment. The adopted Comprehensive Plan describes the CMU designation as "allow[ing] for light manufacturing, retail, multifamily, and offices along major transportation corridors. It is primarily used along Sprague Avenue, and the north-south arterials." McDonald Road is an improved north-south Minor Arterial that is consistent with the description of the CMU designation. Additionally, proposed amendment increases office and parking opportunities in the McDonald Road corridor. 2. The proposed amendment is consistent with the requirements of Chapter 36.70A RCW and with the portion of the City's adopted plan not affected by the amendment. The Growth Management Act(GMA)adopts thirteen goals to guide the development of local comprehensive plans and development regulations. The request allows opportunity to provide an expansion of office use on a designated Minor Arterial with supporting infrastructure. The proposal is consistent with goals of GMA and the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The proposed amendment responds to a substantial change in conditions beyond the property owner's control applicable to the area within which the subject property lies. The two parcels to the south of the proposed amendment were changed from Office to CMU as part of the 2016 legislative update as part of a larger 2016 amendment to eliminate the Office designation,and the owner of the subject property is the same owner of the McDonald Professional Center. 4. The proposed amendment is not in response to or correct an obvious mapping error. 5. The proposed amendment addresses an identified deficiency in the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan has identified the following goals and policies that support increasing employment opportunities while taking advantage of existing supportive infrastructure.The proposed amendment contributes to the long-term success of the City: a. ED-P6 Promote the development or redevelopment of vacant and underutilized properties,particularly those with potential to serve as a catalyst for economic development. b. LU-G2 Provide for land uses that are essential to Spokane Valley residents, employees, and visitors. c. T-G2 Ensure that transportation planning efforts reflect anticipated land use patterns and support identified growth opportunities. 6. The change to CMU will allow for expanded office and office related uses such as parking.The change could result in more intensive development in the future,though the site immediately to the south is vacant and designated and zoned CMU. There is no concern on the effect of the physical environment. 7. There are no known critical areas associated with the site, such as wetlands, fish and wildlife habitat areas, frequently flooded areas or geologically hazardous areas. The parcel is not located within shoreline jurisdiction, and there are no known surface water quality or quantity issues.The City's critical areas ordinance ensures adequate protection of critical areas and stormwater associated with commercial development will be retained and treated on the site. 8. The property is adjacent to CMU to the south and MFR to the east.To the north and west are existing single family homes on SFR designated properties. If approved, the development of the site will be subject to the transitional regulations that will ensure protection of the adjacent homes to the north and south.Potential development consistent with the CMU zone will be compatible with properties to the south and east. The projected impact to the surrounding neighborhood is minimal. Any future development will be evaluated for compliance with all municipal requirements as it relates to adjacent uses at the time of development. Ordinance 20-009, 2020 Zoning Map and Code Amendments Page 5 of 14 DRAFT 9. McDonald Road is a Minor Arterial and is expected to accommodate the projected change. The projected LOS for McDonald Road in 2040 is A-C, and no mitigations or transportation projects are planned for this section of McDonald Road within the 20-year planning horizon. The subject property and the property immediately to the south are considered infill; the expansion of office in this area is ideal because of the supporting infrastructure that is in place overall impact to the transportation system is minimal. 10. The proposed change would allow the property to support the expansion of the McDonald Professional Center, increasing employment opportunities and growing the City's economy. The change will benefit the City and region by supporting the following adopted Comprehensive Plan goal and policy: a.ED-G1 Support economic opportunities and employment growth for Spokane Valley b. ED-P3 Encourage businesses that provide jobs and grow local markets. 11. The proposal would add approximately 0.5 acres of CMU property to the 1,666 acres of existing CMU designated property within the City.The CMU designation in this location allows for the expansion of an existing office development on the McDonald Road corridor in an area supported by existing infrastructure. The proposal is limited to a reasonable area and if developed under CMU standards the type of use and density would be appropriate for the location. 12. There is one dwelling unit proposed to be removed. While CMU allows residential development, it is not expected that residential development would occur and therefore the City would lose one single family house as a result of the amendment. The change is not expected to have significant impacts to population density in the area. 13. The CMU designation will support the goals and policies identified above.There will be no effect on other elements of the Comprehensive Plan, including Housing, Capital Facilities and Public Services, Public and Private Utilities, Parks and Open Space and Natural Resources. 14. The criteria of SVMC 17.80.140(H)are met by the amendment. Council Decision: Change the zoning for parcel number 45152.1004 to Corridor Mixed Use (CMU). File No. CPA-2020-0002: Proposal: Request to change the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation from Industrial (I) to Regional Commercial (RC) and to change the Zoning District from Industrial (I) to Regional Commercial (RC). Applicant: Lawrence B. Stone Properties,PO Box 3949, Spokane,WA 99220. Amendment Location: Parcel number 35133.2321,located north Fancher Road,further located in the SW I/4 of Section 13, Township 25 North, Range 43 East, Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washington. Council adopts and makes the following Findings for CPA-2020-0002: 1. 2. The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to the public health,safety, welfare, and protection of the environment. The proposed amendment provides the opportunity to aggregate parcels creating greater depth to provide for a larger format structure.Based on the application,the intent is to combine the two Regional Commercial (RC)parcels to the south with the proposal. Both the Industrial(I) and RC designations and zoning districts allow for intensive uses.Providing opportunity for development and redevelopment where there is existing infrastructure has a substantial benefit to public health, safety, and welfare. 2. The proposed amendment is consistent with the requirements of Chapter 36.70A RCW and with the portion of the City's adopted plan not affected by the amendment. The Growth Management Act(GMA)adopts thirteen goals to guide the development of local Ordinance 20-009, 2020 Zoning Map and Code Amendments Page 6 of 14 DRAFT comprehensive plans and development regulations. The request allows opportunity to aggregate parcels in an area that is already served by supporting infrastructure. The proposal does not conflict with any other GMA goals. The amendment is not in conflict with any other portions of the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The proposed amendment does not respond to a substantial change in conditions beyond the property owner's control applicable to the area within which the subject property lies. 4. The proposed amendment does not correct a mapping error. 5. The proposed amendment addresses an identified deficiency in the Comprehensive Plan. While not identified as a deficiency, the Comprehensive Plan includes the following goals and policies that support increasing employment opportunities while taking advantage of existing supportive infrastructure.The proposed amendment contributes to the long-term success of the City by: a.ED-G1 Support economic opportunities and employment growth for Spokane Valley. b. ED-P6 Promote the development or redevelopment of vacant and underutilized properties, particularly those with potential to serve as a catalyst for economic development. c.LU-G2 Provide for land uses that are essential to Spokane Valley residents, employees, and visitors. d. LU-G3 Support the transformation of commercial, industrial, and mixed-use areas into accessible districts that attract economic activity. e. CF-P2 Optimize the use of existing public facilities before investing in new facilities. 6. The change to RC will allow uses similarly allowed along the Sprague corridor. The change may result in a more people-oriented active use in the area versus a vacant or industrial use, but the intensity would be similar to existing nearby uses. There is no concern on effect of physical environment. 7. There are no known critical areas associated with the site, such as wetlands, fish and wildlife habitat areas, frequently flooded areas or geologically hazardous areas. The parcel is not located within shoreline jurisdiction,and there are no known surface water quality or quantity issues. The City's critical areas ordinance will ensure that adequate protection of critical areas and adjacent land use are addressed when future development occurs and stormwater associated with commercial development will be retained and treated on the site. 8. The property is adjacent to RC to the west and south; and Ito the north and east. To the north are existing industrial developments and users.To the south is a vacant used motor vehicle sales lot that is under the same ownership. To the west is Home Depot. The projected impact to the surrounding neighborhood is minimal. Any future development will be evaluated for compliance with all municipal requirements as it relates to adjacent uses at the time of development. 9. Sprague Avenue is a Principal Arterial and is expected to accommodate the projected change.The 20-year Transportation Improvement Plan identifies a concrete intersection at Sprague and Fancher by 2039. The existing and projected LOS for this segment of Sprague Avenue is D within City's adopted standard.Additionally,the change from Ito RC is expected to have a minimal impact to the transportation network and other utilities. 10. The proposed change would allow the property to be combined with the two properties fronting Sprague Avenue, increasing employment opportunities and growing the city's economy. The change benefits the neighborhood, City, and region by supporting the following adopted Comprehensive Plan goals and policies: a. ED-GI Support economic opportunities and employment growth for Spokane Valley. Ordinance 20-009, 2020 Zoning Map and Code Amendments Page 7 of 14 DRAFT b. ED-P6 Promote the development or redevelopment of vacant and underutilized properties, particularly those with potential to serve as a catalyst for economic development. c. LU-G2 Provide for land uses that are essential to Spokane Valley residents, employees, and visitors. d. LU-G3 Support the transformation of commercial, industrial, and mixed-use areas into accessible districts that attract economic activity. e. CF-P2 Optimize the use of existing public facilities before investing in new facilities. 11. The proposal would add approximately three acres of RC property to the 809 acres of existing RC designated property within the City. As of 2018, there are approximately 111 acres of vacant RC property within the City.The amendment allows for commercial development on the Sprague Avenue corridor in an area supported by existing infrastructure. The proposal is limited to a reasonable area and if developed under RC standards the type of use and density will be appropriate for the location. 12. Under the existing conditions the subject property is a paved vacant lot. It appears the property was used in conjunction with the RC designated property to the south for used motor vehicle sales,which is presently vacant. The change of the property from Ito RC will not impact current or projected population density in the area. 13. The RC designation will support the goals and policies identified above. It would have very little to no effect on other elements of the Comprehensive Plan,including Housing, Capital Facilities and Public Services,Public and Private Utilities,Parks and Open Space and Natural Resources. 14. The criteria of SVMC 17.80.140(H)are met by the amendment. Council Decision: Change the zoning for parcel number 35133.2321 to Regional Commercial (RC)). File No. CPA-2020-0003: Proposal: Request to change the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation from Multifamily Residential(MFR)to Corridor Mixed Use(CMU)and to change the Zoning District from Multifamily Residential (MFR)to Corridor Mixed Use(CMU). Applicant: Jay Rambo,PO Box 212011, Spokane Valley,WA 99214 Amendment Location: Parcel numbers 45094.0133,45094.0134, and 45094.0121 addressed as 1723 and 1724 N Union Road,further located in the SE I/4 of Section 09,Township 25 North,Range 44 East, Willamette Meridian, Spokane County,Washington. Council adopts and makes the following Findings for CPA-2020-0003: 1. The proposed amendment changing the land use designation from Multiple Family Residential to (MFR) to Corridor Mixed Use (CMU) has a substantial relationship to the public health, safety,welfare,and protection of the environment.The adopted Comprehensive Plan describes the CMU designation as "allow[ing] for light manufacturing, retail, multifamily, and offices along major transportation corridors.It is primarily used along Sprague Avenue,and the north- south arterials." The subject properties are between CMU properties to the west, east, and south.Access is provided by Union Road via Mission Avenue.Mission Ave is a Minor Arterial. Changing the land use designation to CMU increases the flexibility of allowed uses and allowed density on the sites in an area with supportive infrastructure,which has benefit to public health, safety,and welfare. 2. The proposed amendment is consistent with the requirements of Chapter 36.70A RCW and with the portion of the City's adopted plan not affected by the amendment. The Growth Management Act (GMA) adopts thirteen goals to guide the development of local comprehensive plans and development regulations. The request allows opportunity to expand Ordinance 20-009, 2020 Zoning Map and Code Amendments Page 8 of 14 DRAFT the multiple family development on the site and the opportunity to provide the neighborhood with access to daily goods and services in a centralized area with adequate public facilities; there are two projects in the 6-year TIP along Mission Avenue just south of this area to improve capacity. The proposal does not conflict with any other GMA goals. The amendment is not in conflict with any other portions of the comprehensive plan. 3. The proposed amendment does not respond to a substantial change in conditions beyond the property owner's control applicable to the area within which the subject property lies. While the amendment does not respond directly to a substantial change in conditions beyond the owner's control,the 2016 legislative update to the Comprehensive Plan eliminated the Office designation generally replacing it with the CMU designation,which was the case for the parcels to the west, east, and south. While the 2016 plan changed the designation of the surrounding vacant lands from Office to CMU, the properties subject to the amendment request had a multiple family development and the designation of Multiple Family was not changed. The CMU designation provides more flexibility than the Office and Multiple Family designations. The changing of the surrounding properties from Office to CMU created a situation whereby the subject properties may not use their property to the similarly situated properties to the west, east, and south. 4. The amendment is not in response to a mapping error and would not correct any error. 5. The proposed amendment addresses an identified deficiency in the Comprehensive Plan. Changing the designation from MFR to CMU on an existing developed parcel provides the opportunity to increase density on developed parcels using pre-existing infrastructure and provide flexibility to add service retail oriented to the area that may be supported by the multiple family housing. The Comprehensive Plan identifies the following goals and policies that support the proposed change: a.LU-G1 Maintain and enhance the character and quality of life in Spokane Valley. b. LU-P16 Maximize the density of development along major transit corridors and near transit centers and commercial areas. c. H-GI Allow for a broad range of housing opportunities to meet the needs of the community. d. H-G3 Allow convenient access to daily goods and services in Spokane Valley's neighborhoods. e. CF-P2 Optimize the use of existing public facilities before investing in new facilities. 6. The change to CMU will allow existing uses as well as commercial, office and higher residential development of the properties.The properties will have the opportunity to transition, add density and a mix of uses to serve the surrounding neighborhood. There is no concern on effect of physical environment. 7. The effect on open space,streams,rivers and lakes minimal. There are no known critical areas associated with the site, such as wetlands, fish and wildlife habitat areas, frequently flooded areas or geologically hazardous areas.The parcels are not located within shoreline jurisdiction, and there are no known surface water quality or quantity issues. 8. The CMU zone is compatible and will have little impact on adjacent land uses and surrounding neighborhoods. The 6.25-acre site is currently developed with a multiple family development and a one single family home. The adjacent use to the south is single family,to the west self- storage, to the east office, multiple family and vacant CMU. The CMU land use designation surrounds the amendment site to the west, east, and north. Potential development consistent with the CMU zone will be compatible with properties to the west, east, and south, and transitional regulations will protect the single family zone to the north. 9. The subject properties are considered infill development, as such, the expansion of allowed uses and increased densities are supported by community facilities and infrastructure that is in place. Mission Avenue is a Minor Arterial. There are two projects in the 6-year TIP along Mission Avenue just south of this area,one of which is the intersection capacity improvement Ordinance 20-009, 2020 Zoning Map and Code Amendments Page 9 of 14 DRAFT and signal modification at Pines/Mission. Site-specific improvements and their impact to this project would be identified through the development review process, and development on the parcels within the Mirabeau Subarea Study area. 10. The proposed change would allow the property to increase density and support infill development in an area planned for growth. The change may support increased housing opportunities,office,employment,or access to daily goods and services. The change benefits the neighborhood, city, and region by supporting the following adopted Comprehensive Plan goal and policy: a. ED-GI Support economic opportunities and employment growth for Spokane Valley b. ED-P3 Encourage businesses that provide jobs and grow local markets. 11. The proposal would add approximately 6.5 acres of CMU property to the 1,666 acres of existing CMU designated property within the city. The CMU designation in this place would allow for increased options for development including increased density and retail services that may serve multiple family development. The proposal is limited to a reasonable area and if developed under CMU standards the type of use and density would be appropriate for the location. 12. The current designation and zoning is MFR which has a density maximum of 22 dwelling units per acre. While CMU allows unlimited density, actual densities in the CMU are generally consistent with those in the MFR designation and zoning. The change is not expected to have significant impacts to the planned population density in the area. 13. The CMU designation will support the goals and policies identified above. It would have very little to no effect on other elements of the Comprehensive Plan, including Housing, Capital Facilities and Public Services,Public and Private Utilities,Parks and Open Space and Natural Resources. 14. The criteria of SVMC 17.80.140(H)are met by the amendment. Council Decision: Change the zoning for parcel numbers 45094.0133, 45094.0134, and 45094.0121 to Corridor Mixed Use(CMU). File No.: CPA-2020-0006 Proposal: Request to change the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation from Industrial (I) to Corridor Mixed Use (CMU) and to change the Zoning District from Industrial (I) to Corridor Mixed Use (CMU) Applicant: City of Spokane Valley, 10210 East Sprague Avenue, Spokane Valley,WA 99206. Amendment Location: Parcel numbers 45013.9024 addressed as 3830 N Sullivan, further located in the SW I/4 of Section 01, Township 25 North, Range 44 East, Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washington. Council adopts and makes the following Findings for CPA-2020-0006: 1. The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to the public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment. The proposed amendment provides more flexibility of uses on a property allowing East Valley School District(EVSD)to broaden and enhance their educational service mission. Under the Industrial zone educational activities are limited to professional, vocational and trade schools. While this may continue to be an essential component to EVSD curriculum,flexibility is needed to meet existing and future demand for other educational services. Changing the designation to Corridor Mixed Use (CMU), increases the allowed types of educational services legally permitted to occur in the existing facility. Increasing educational opportunities to local youth has a substantial benefit to public health, safety, and welfare. 2. The proposed amendment is consistent with the requirements of Chapter 36.70A RCW and with the portion of the City's adopted plan not affected by the amendment. The Growth Management Act(GMA)adopts thirteen goals to guide the development of local Ordinance 20-009, 2020 Zoning Map and Code Amendments Page 10 of 14 DRAFT comprehensive plans and development regulations. The request allows opportunity to strengthen EVSD mission to provide for education of local youth in an area with adequate public facilities. The proposal does not conflict with any other GMA goals. The amendment is not in conflict with any other portions of the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The amendment does respond to a substantial change in demographic conditions from 2016 legislative update to the Comprehensive Plan. EVSD has experienced changes in enrollment and interest in vocational education, under the existing I designation only professional,vocational and trade schools are allowed changing the designation to CMU allows EVSD to adapt the educational services they provide in a location they own and have made substantial improvements for educational purposes. The demographic and interest shifts are beyond EVSD control the proposed change allows them to continue to serve district educational needs. 4. The proposed text amendments do not correct a mapping error. 5. The proposed amendment addresses an identified deficiency in the Comprehensive Plan. While not directly identified as a deficiency,the Comprehensive Plan has identified the following goal and policy that support workforce development and education,which are integral to the long-term success of the City: a.ED-G5 Support and encourage the development of a strong workforce that is globally competitive and responds to the changing needs of the workplace b. ED-P16 Support local educational institutions in the development of educational and training programs that meet the needs of businesses. 6. The change to CMU will allow existing uses as well as more expanded educational uses. The change could result in more intensive development in the future,though the site is currently developed.There is no concern on effect of physical environment. 7. There are no known critical areas associated with the site, such as wetlands, fish and wildlife habitat areas, frequently flooded areas or geologically hazardous areas. The parcel is not located within shoreline jurisdiction, and there are no known surface water quality or quantity issues. The City's critical areas ordinance will ensure that adequate protection of the critical areas and adjacent land use are addressed should future development occur. 8. The property is generally surrounded by Spokane Industrial Park to the north and east; however, the property is not part of the Spokane Industrial Park. The property to the south is designated and zoned CMU. The institutional use on the proposed site is generally compatible with both the light industrial uses to the north and east and the retail service uses to the south. The projected impact to the surrounding neighborhoods is minimal. Any future development will be evaluated for compliance with all municipal requirements as it relates to adjacent uses at the time of development. 9. B Street is a local access street and Sullivan Road is a Principal Arterial. There are two capacity related projects in the 6-year TIP near the project area:intersection improvement at Sullivan and Wellesley and improvement to Sullivan and SR 290(Trent)interchange. The subject property are considered infill development,as such,the expansion of allowed uses and increased densities are supported by the infrastructure that is in place. 10. The proposed change would allow the property and structure owned by EVSD to be used for educational purposes beyond professional,vocational and trade school use,increasing the school district's ability to provide educational services. The change benefits the neighborhood, City,and region. 11. The proposal would add approximately 9 acres of CMU property to the 1,666 acres of existing CMU designated property within the City. While additional demand for CMU property may be limited, the CMU designation allows for additional educational uses, which has been indicated as needed from EVSD. The proposal is limited to a reasonable Ordinance 20-009, 2020 Zoning Map and Code Amendments Page 11 of 14 DRAFT area and if developed under CMU standards the type of use and density would be appropriate for the location. 12. Under the existing conditions and the Industrial designation there is very little population that resides in the area. While CMU allows residential development, it is not expected that residential development would occur. The proposed change in land use designation is not expected to have significant impacts to population density in the area. 13. The CMU designation will support the goal and policy identified above. It would have very little to no effect on other elements of the Comprehensive Plan,including Land Use, Transportation, and Housing, Capital Facilities and Public Services, Public and Private Utilities,Parks and Open Space and Natural Resources. 14. The criteria of SVMC 17.80.140(H)are met by the amendment. Council Decision: Change the zoning for parcel number 45013.9024 to Corridor Mixed Use (CMU). File No. CPA-2020-0007: Proposal: Amend the Spokane Valley Municipal Code to implement the amendments made to the Comprehensive Plan by CPA-2020-0007. The amendments include creating a new R-4 zoning district an implementing zone for the Single Family Residential land use designation. Applicant: City of Spokane Valley, 10210 East Sprague Avenue, Spokane Valley,WA 99206. Amendment Location:Applies citywide. Council adopts and makes the following Findings for CPA-2020-0007: 1. The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to the public health, safety,welfare, and protection of the environment. Housing is an important component of the economic infrastructure of the city. Ensuring that there is a variety of housing types is an important competitive advantage for economic development. The proposed amendment will allow the City to more closely align its housing needs with locations within the City to ensure adequate infrastructure is available.This will also enable the provision of quality,affordable housing for all Spokane Valley residents. 2. The proposed amendment is consistent with the requirements of Chapter 36.70A RCW and with the portion of the City's adopted plan not affected by the amendment. The Growth Management Act (GMA) adopts thirteen goals to guide the development of local comprehensive plans and development regulations. The GMA provides that the housing element serves to encourage the availability of affordable housing to residents of all economic backgrounds, promote a variety of residential densities and housing types, and encourage the preservation of existing neighborhoods. The proposed amendment will provide increased housing options in locations that have adequate infrastructure that can affordably support increased densities. 3. The proposed amendment responds to a substantial change in conditions beyond the property owner's control applicable to the area within which the subject property lies. The amendment is not related to a specific piece of property. It does,however,respond to a substantial change in conditions from 2016 legislative update to the Comprehensive Plan. This change relates to increased duplex development in neighborhoods with larger lots as a result of the 2016 legislative update. This amendment looks to incentivize alternative housing development where there is frequent transit and commercial services. 4. The proposed amendment is not in response to or corrects an obvious mapping error. 5. The proposed amendment addresses an identified deficiency in the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan identifies that the city will need an additional 6,389 homes by 2037(3,962 single family homes and 2,417 multifamily).The plan also identifies that the median household income in the city was approximately$2,000 less than the average countywide annual earnings. Additional data indicates that residents are cost-burdened with 51% of renters and 26% of Ordinance 20-009, 2020 Zoning Map and Code Amendments Page 12 of 14 DRAFT homeowners spending at least 33 percent of their monthly budget on rent or mortgage payments. The following adopted goals, policies, and strategy support the proposed amendment: a.H-G1 Allow for a broad range of housing opportunities to meet the needs of the community. b.H-G2 Enable the development of affordable housing for all income levels. c. Strategy: Continue to evaluate new housing typologies to meet market needs. 6. The proposed amendment is policy oriented and as a non-site specific amendment does not have a direct effect on the physical environment. Future development that may result will be evaluated under city regulations for physical development. 7. The proposed amendment is policy oriented and does not have a direct effect on open space, streams, rivers and lakes. The City's critical areas ordinance will ensure that adequate protection of critical areas and adjacent land use are addressed should future development occur. 8. The proposed amendment is policy oriented and includes implementing development regulations that are aimed to protect neighborhood character and locate alternative housing in areas with frequent transit and commercial services. 9. Capital Facilities Policy CF-P6 recommends that facilities and services meet minimum Level of Service(LOS)Standards.LOS standards have been adopted for water,sewer,transportation, stormwater, law enforcement, libraries,parks, street cleaning,public transit, fire, and schools. The proposed amendment seeks to take advantage of available infrastructure to minimize the need to develop and maintain new infrastructure. 10 Increasing housing options that protect neighborhood character and minimize the need for new infrastructure can potentially reduce housing costs and thereby reducing the amount of city residents paying more than 33 percent of their income toward housing, which would benefit the neighborhood,city and region.The change benefits the neighborhood, City, and region by supporting the following adopted Comprehensive Plan goal and policy: a. ED-P8 Provide and maintain an infrastructure system that supports Spokane Valley's economic development priorities. b. LU-G1 Maintain and enhance the character and quality of life in Spokane Valley. c. LU-G4 Ensure that land use plans, regulations, review processes, and infrastructure improvements support economic growth and vitality d. LU-P14 Enable a variety of housing types. e. LU-P16 Maximize the density of development along major transit corridors and near transit centers and commercial areas. f.H-G3 Allow convenient access to daily goods and services in Spokane Valley's neighborhoods. 11. The proposed amendment does not change the location or quantity of land designations. Implementing changes to the zoning code increase densities in locations with adequate infrastructure support, and may reduce densities in other locations.The amendment consistent with the adopted Comprehensive Plan and the demand forecasted. 12. The implementing regulations increase density in areas that are supported by adequate infrastructure and may reduce densities in other locations. The proposed amendment is not expected to have significant impacts to population density on a citywide level. Implementing regulations are consistent with the adopted Comprehensive Plan and the demand forecasted. 13. The proposed amendment will support and consistent with the Comprehensive Plan's housing goals, policies, and strategies. The amendment will not have a direct impact on other Comprehensive Plan elements. Implementing regulations are consistent with the adopted Comprehensive Plan and the demand forecast. 14. The criteria of SVMC 17.80.140(H)are met by the amendment. 15. 14. The criteria of SVMC 17.80.150(F) are met by the amendment. Ordinance 20-009, 2020 Zoning Map and Code Amendments Page 13 of 14 DRAFT Council Decision: Amend the Zoning Map by adding an R-4 zoning district as shown in Attachment "A" and adopt implementing development regulations for the new R-4 zone as identified in CPA-2020-0007 and Attachment"B". Section 5. Zoning Map/Official Controls. Pursuant to RCW 35A.63.100, for the purpose of regulating the use of land and to implement and give effect to the Comprehensive Plan, the City hereby amends the Official City Zoning Map as set forth in Attachment"A". Section 6. Zoning Code Amendments. Pursuant to RCW 35A.63.100, for the purpose of regulating use of land and to implement and give effect to the Comprehensive Plan,the City herby amends the Spokane Valley Municipal Code as set forth in Attachment"B"subject to and based on the findings for CPA-2020- 0007. Section 7. Adoption of Other Laws. To the extent that any provision of the SVMC,or any other law, rule, or regulation referenced in the attached Zoning Map(s) is necessary or convenient to establish the validity,enforceability,or interpretation of the Zoning Map(s),then such provision of the SVMC,or other law,rule,or regulation is hereby adopted by reference. Section 8. Map- Copies on File-Administrative Action. The Zoning Map is maintained in the office of the City Clerk as well as the City Department of Community and Public Works. The City Manager or designee, following adoption of this Ordinance, is authorized to modify the Zoning Map in a manner consistent with this Ordinance,including correcting scrivener's errors. Section 9. Liability. The express intent of the City is that the responsibility for compliance with the provisions of this Ordinance shall rest with the permit applicant and their agents. This Ordinance and its provisions are adopted with the express intent to protect the health,safety,and welfare of the general public and are not intended to protect any particular class of individuals or organizations. Section 10. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause,or phrase of this Ordinance shall be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause, or phrase of this Ordinance. Section 11. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect five days after publication of this Ordinance or a summary thereof in the official newspaper of the City as provided by law. PASSED by the City Council this day of September,2020. ATTEST: Ben Wick,Mayor Christine Bainbridge,City Clerk Approved As To Form: Office of the City Attorney Date of Publication: Effective Date: Ordinance 20-009, 2020 Zoning Map and Code Amendments Page 14 of 14 Ordinance 20-009 Attachment A Zoning Map Study Are] E Sinto Ave -71 -71 • 0 z Legend E Sharp Ave R 1 MF r RC R2 NC IMU R3 MU POS CMU � J CPA-2020-0001 Request: Owner: Tucker Roy LLC Proposed change: Land Use Parcel#: 45152.1004 designation from SFR to CMU *Valley Address: 1311 N McDonald Rd and Zoning from R3 to CMU Zoning Map 1z xE Nixon Ave 0 a 1111 1 1 I I I I I I II 1 1--„. �E-Main-Ave I -.., •• P4 Study Area U ct w z I / AIM k, qo w, E Sprague Ave �— qo w, Al a4 _. Legend w c,' R1 MF RC NC IMU MU/ Ja. CMU CPA-2020-0002 Request: i—i""° Owner: Lawrence B Stone pUane Proposed change: Land Use designation Properties#50 LLC from Ito RC and Zoning from Ito RC *Valley Parcel#: 35133.2321 Address: N Fancher Rd Zoning Map 1111. E Montgomery Ave ------/- *---------_____--------191pr E 190 W 289 On Ramp E 190 Fwy• Study Area E I 90 E289 OFF Ra ,. IE Nora Ave -cl 0-g — o jir1. :z z L E Mission Aye —\ ,- M Legend _ R1 IMF RC R2 NC IMU lE-Maxwell Ave R3 MU I _ ill POS CMU 1 I I I 1 1 1 CPA-2020-0003 Request: t'iip ors Owner. Revere-Dece III LC Proposed change: Land Use Revere-Dece 20202 Bu Building Owner LLC 40000 ill Properties designation from MF to CMU Valley Parcel#: Br450940133C.0134,.0121 and Zoning from MF to CMU Address: 1723/1724 N Union Rd Zoning Map Study Are] E^Industrial Via:St cip F�1 E Kiernan Ave Y 3 Industrial Park B St C z Legend R1 MF RC R2 NC IMU R3 MUMIL IL I POS CMU CPA-2020-0006 Request: Sp"""' Owner: East Valley School okane Proposed change: Land Use District#361 designation from Ito CMU .000 Valley Parcel#: 45013.9024 and Zoning from Ito CMU Address: 3830 N Sullivan Rd Zoning Map cr Plante's c E Wellesle Ave mili Ferry Sports E Stadium o > a ' w z Myrtle Point'. Z _." �� _ _ Conservation ',`14.1.1 � Orchard WA State Parks. • 0 a � , �r Ave Park Centennial Trail EmP oll .� E Mirabeau er ° �G�a-� Pkwy E Eu.i. A ve �u City �1 // P`I' I:uckeye Park �� Mirabeau Ave ��\c® Point Park Mont. c� 0 co °m°rYO E Mans % Center ��E Knox Av 7-1— —�1�= �= o� _ y Zj' Sun E Mission E Mis . Valley ••• i17,7.4.` . Ave v„ �_ ■ j Mission I. E Mission Ave - �_j o Park - o o rof \�� ► AL z ___, co ii ` \� 1 ,t Park 2 c a c ``■ - N \ 1 Road A Q Z .T E Broa�w `6 a l __ 2 c. PIP du I mmllr n'iimill I r'r.�o.g9;IlIC• I' ::III r..:6. : _ Pool ,5'lll"?IIL�I _ "Iln .IIII IIII +_ :nib ��■Ii.. _� URINE' f 1�' :^EIa.II i� : ■ r'ici itIll NNE.a agl=mariiiI_.. :n"� =111111n - ,l' I ••••? ��•••••- � 1 =1 ' IIII CIE"::Illli I�:'-'I=_==�M__ paw L:al;' III[ =1;-11111 NE111111" Ind■ ...i:.^ I I: l 71 =: ii': loll EVEN I'-�_. 7!'=9�I�.iai.alLa1111:iC[IIIIh Ili`ii::dlhllhlllll ..Iliki IIlllll[i�L .II IIII��I� - ::r—•i;..,I1�'r.Ma 1 II i::iii �p=r all WI N 'm HMO :. ' : _ i._mllp aim ih� '-n IP'MO qu II•._'lll!!o___..onm n ��_�_� 'ai Yiii 4l a! ='l11 I.111111=:111?_I:IEeII� __ _ ��II ��=T:. _ : _�. •--......-:'_ "'.i_= " Balfour I .:1 = '�";:: _ _ ' '- _�_-- ,, Park E - .ueAve Camp • Ave , _ � T •01 T Caro "0.........m':III 1_.91 �1�� e:R ?�IIh';'_.'�:I:I:6SIii�,.......PH. I••-'... ,�:;� �11 : Edgecliff ■ ' �Stra �. m� €71fIIT �'t_ iiim--� : .e= , i: :� ■ ellll:: n' -"""'1I11iiiiiiiEt fin' �='-_elk - FAO ,'ii Park T '�''.�: r....:1a7::."••• =ll'Ai11s11. I._leel li:'i i - 1=ili M IN AG liI . ...... m i ..::I'eli s ii 1 i riI, i ' m Mb E i Natural Area \ e le, 2 a Pi co co ct >. E 16I;Ave _ 2 2 Q r '5 Sa/t'w. w U) U' a e Ra t u) c O D -0 S co Terrace 3 N ' View l k. Park/Pool E 24th A e -), Legend 0- Casts"' E I Municipality Name R3 CMU l ' Pa k s Spokane Valley POS ® RC Conservatat ionn 4. �a od��d� R4 (Proposed) MF IMU /,.? �/4 ` R2 MU 44th Ave CPA-2020-0007 Request: c��o pkane Owner: Various Proposed change: Create a new R4 zoning district �,,..Valley Parcel#: Multiple implements SFR designation. ATTACHMENT B 19.20.010 Zoning districts. The City has established the following zoning districts: Comprehensive Plan Map Land Use Designation Symbol Zoning District Single-Family R-1 Single-Family Residential Residential Estate Single-Family R-2 Single-Family Residential Residential Suburban Single-Family R-3 Single-Family Residential Residential Urban Single-Family R-4 Single-Family Residential Residential Urban Multifamily Residential MFR Multifamily Residential Mixed Use MU Mixed Use Corridor Mixed Use CMU Corridor Mixed Use Neighborhood NC Neighborhood Commercial Commercial Regional Commercial RC Regional Commercial Industrial I Industrial Industrial Mixed Use IMU Industrial Mixed Use Parks, Recreation,and P/OS Parks/Open Space Open Space 19.20.015 Zoning districts purpose. A. R-1—Single-Family Residential Estate. Preserves the distinct character of existing single-family large lot development,while allowing for a limited number of large animals. B. R-2—Single-Family Residential Suburban. Preserves existing single-family development patterns, while allowing for development that is similar in size and scale to the surrounding neighborhood. C. R-3—Single-Family Residential Urban. Allows for single-family residential development at an urban density that provides flexibility and promotes reinvestment in existing single-family neighborhoods. D. R-4—Single-Family Residential Urban. Allows for single-family residential development at an urban density that provides flexibility and promotes reinvestment in existing single-family neighborhoods. 13E. MFR—Multifamily Residential. Allows for multifamily housing located near business and commercial centers,the arterial street system, and public transit. Adjacent single-family zones are protected through transitional standards. Page 1 of 8 ATTACHMENT B €F. MU—Mixed Use. Allows for two or more different land uses within developments. Mixed-use developments can be either vertical or horizontally mixed, and could include employment uses such as office, retail, and/or lodging along with higher-density residential uses, and in some cases, community or cultural facilities. Adjacent residential zones are protected through transitional standards. €G. CMU—Corridor Mixed Use. Allows for light manufacturing, retail, multifamily, and offices along major transportation corridors. Adjacent residential zones are protected through transitional standards. 4}H. NC— Neighborhood Commercial. Allows for small-scale neighborhood retail and office uses while allowing for single-family development. #I. RC— Regional Commercial. Allows a broad range of retail,wholesale, service, and other compatible uses, with a wide range of development types.Adjacent residential zones are protected through transitional standards. 41. I— Industrial. Allows all types of industrial development such as manufacturing, processing, fabrication, assembly, disassembly, and freight-handling.Transitional standards protect adjacent nonindustrial zones from industrial uses that have significant noise, odor, or aesthetic impacts. 4K. IMU— Industrial Mixed Use. Allows retail, office, light manufacturing, and other light industrial uses such as contractor yards.Transitional standards protect adjacent nonindustrial zones from industrial uses that have significant noise, odor, or aesthetic impacts. 4L. P/OS—Parks/Open Space. Protects and provides for parks, open space, and other natural physical assets of the community. 19.60.050 Permitted uses matrix. Parks Residential Mixed Use Commercial Industrial and Open Space R-1 R-2 R-3 R-4 MFR MU CMU NC RC IMU I POS Agriculture and Animal Animal processing/handling P Animal raising and/or keeping S S S S S S Animal shelter S P P Beekeeping,commercial P Beekeeping,hobby S S S Community garden S S S S S S S S Greenhouse/nursery,commercial P P P Kennel S S S S P P Orchard,tree farming,commercial P P Riding stable P P C Communication Facilities Radio/TV broadcasting studio P P P P Page 2 of 8 ATTACHMENT B Parks Residential Mixed Use Commercial Industrial and Open Space R-1 R-2 R-3 R-4 MFR MU CMU NC RC IMU I POS Repeater facility P P P P P P P P P Small cell deployment S S S S S S S S S S S S Telecommunication wireless antenna S S S S S S S S S S S array - Telecommunication wireless support S S S _ S S S S S S S tower Tower,ham operator S S S S S S S S S S S Community Services Community hall,club,or lodge P P P P P P P P I Church,temple,mosque,synagogue and P P P P P P P P house of worship Crematory P P P P Funeral home P P Transitional housing C Day Care Day care,adult P P P P P P P P P P P Day care,child(12 children or fewer) P P P P P P P P P P P Day care,child (13 children or more) C C C C P P P P P P P Eating and Drinking Establishment P P P P P P S Education Schools,college or university P P P I Schools,K through 12 P P P P P P P P Schools,professional,vocational and P P P P P P trade schools Schools,specialized training/studios P P P P Entertainment Adult entertainment and retail S Casino P P P Cultural facilities P P P P Exercise facility S S S S Off-road recreational vehicle use P P Major event entertainment P P P Racecourse P P P P Racetrack P P Recreational facility P P P P P P Theater,indoor P P P Group Living Page 3 of 8 ATTACHMENT B Parks Residential Mixed Use Commercial Industrial and Open Space R-1 R-2 R-3 R-4 MFR MU CMU NC RC IMU I POS Assisted living/convalescent/nursing42 P P P P home I Community residential facilities(6 P P P P P P residents or less) Community residential facilities(greater than 6 and under 25 residents) P P P Dwelling,congregate P P P Industrial,Heavy Assembly,heavy P Hazardous waste treatment and storage S S Manufacturing,heavy P Processing,heavy P Mining S Industrial,Light Assembly,light P P P P P Manufacturing,light P P P Processing,light P P Recycling facility S S S S Industrial service P P Lodging I Bed and breakfast P P P P P Hotel/motel P P P P S Recreational vehicle park/campground S Marijuana Uses Marijuana club or lounge Marijuana cooperative Marijuana processing S S Marijuana production S S Marijuana sales S S S Medical S P P P P P Office Animal clinic/veterinary S S S S S Office,professional P P P P P P P Parks and Open Space Cemetery P P P Golf course P P P P P P P P Page 4 of 8 ATTACHMENT B Parks Residential Mixed Use Commercial Industrial and Open Space R-1 R-2 R-3 R-4 MFR MU CMU NC RC IMU I POS Golf driving range C C C C C P C P P P Parks P P P P P P P P P P Public/Quasi-Public Community facilities P P P P P P P P P P P P Essential public facilities R R R R R R R R R R Public utility local distribution facility S S S S S S S S P P P S Public utility transmission facility S S S S S S S S S S S S Tower,wind turbine support S S S S Residential Dwelling,accessory units S S S S S S S S S Dwelling,caretaker's residence S S S S S Dwelling,cottage S S S S S Dwelling,duplex RS P P PS PS Dwelling,industrial accessory dwelling unit S S Dwelling,multifamily P P P Dwelling,single-family P P P P P P P Dwelling,townhouse i S S S S Manufactured home park S S Retail Sales and Service P P S P P S S Transportation Airstrip,private P P Battery charging stations S S S P P P P P P P S Electric vehicle infrastructure P P P P P P P Heliport P P Helistop C C P Parking facility—controlled access P P P P P Railroad yard,repair shop and P roundhouse Transit center P P P P P Vehicle Services Automobile impound yard P P Automobile/taxi rental P P P P P Automobile parts,accessories and tires P P P P P Automobile/truck/RV/motorcycle P P P P painting,repair,body and fender works Page 5 of 8 ATTACHMENT B Parks Residential Mixed Use Commercial Industrial and Open Space R-1 R-2 R-3 R-4 MFR MU CMU NC RC IMU I POS Car wash P P S P P P Farm machinery sales and repair P P P Fueling station P P S P P P Heavy truck and industrial vehicles sales, P P rental,repair and maintenance Passenger vehicle,boat,and RV sales, P P P service and repair Towing P P P P Truck stop P P Warehouse,Wholesale,and Freight Movement Auction house P P P Auction yard(excluding livestock) P P Catalog and mail order houses P P P P P Cold storage/food locker P P Freight forwarding P P Grain elevator P P Storage,general indoor P P S P P P Storage,general outdoor S S S S P P Storage,self-service facility P P P P P P Tank storage,critical material above S S ground Tank storage,critical material below S S S ground Tank storage,LPG above ground S S S S S S Warehouse P P P P P Wholesale business P P P P P 19.40.060 Development standards — Duplexes. Duplexes shall meet the minimum lot size per dwelling unit, setback standards, maximum lot coverage, and building height standards shown in Table 19.70 1. Duplex development in the R-3 zone shall have a minimum lot size of 14,500 square feet. Duplex development in non-residential zones shall meet the requirements set forth in 19.70.050 (G). 19.70.020 Residential standards Residential development shall meet the standards shown in Table 19.70-1. Standards for alternative residential development are set forth in Chapter 19.40 SVMC, Alternative Residential Development Page 6 of 8 ATTACHMENT B Options, and standards for planned residential developments are set forth in Chapter 19.50 SVMC, Planned Residential Developments. Table 19.70-1—Residential Standards R-1 R-2 R-3 R-4 MFR(I) Front and Flanking Street 35' 15' 15' 15' 15' Yard Setback Garage Setback(2) 35' 20' 20' 20 20' Minimum Rear Yard Setback 20' 20' 10' 10' 10' Side Yard Setback 5' 5' 5' 5' 5' Open Space N/A N/A N/A N/A 10%gross area(3) Lot Size$+ 40,000 sq.ft. 10,000 sq.ft. 5,000 sq.ft.0 4,300 sq.ft. N/Aii Lot Coverage 30.0% 50.0% 50.0% 60% 60.0% Maximum Density 1 du/ac 4 du/ac 6-8 du/ac 10 du/ac 22 du/ac Building Heights) 35' 35' 35' 35' 50' (1) Where MFR abuts R-1, R-2,or R-3 zones,development shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 19.75 SVMC,Transitional Regulations. (2) Attached garages,where the garage door does not face the street, may have the same setback as the primary structure. (3) Open space requirement does not apply to single-family development in the MFR zone. (4) Single-family residential development in the MFR zone shall have a minimum lot size of 2,000 square feet per dwelling unit.Only one single-family dwelling shall be allowed per lot. (5) The vertical distance from the average finished grade to the average height of the highest roof surface. Duplex development in the R-3 zone shall have a minimum lot size of 14,500 square feet. APPENDIX A DEFINITIONS Dwelling: A building or portion thereof designed exclusively for residential purposes. Dwelling, accessory unit: A freestanding detached structure or an attached part of a structure that is subordinate and incidental to the primary dwelling unit located on the same property, providing complete, independent living facilities exclusively for a single housekeeping unit, including permanent provisions for living, sleeping, cooking, and sanitation. See "Residential, use category." Dwelling, accessory unit—industrial:A dwelling unit within a primary building located in the Industrial zone for occupancy by a person or family for living and sleeping purposes. Dwelling, accessory unit—industrial mixed-use:A dwelling unit within a primary building located in the Industrial Mixed-Use zone for occupancy by a person or family for living and sleeping purposes. Page 7 of 8 ATTACHMENT B Dwelling, caretaker's residence: A dwelling unit provided for the purpose of on-site supervision and security that is occupied by a bona fide employee of the property owner. See "Residential, use category." Dwelling,congregate: A residential facility under joint occupancy and single management arranged or used for lodging of unrelated individuals, with or without meals, including boarding or rooming houses, dormitories,fraternities and sororities, and convents and monasteries. See "Group living, use category." Dwelling,cottage:A small single-family dwelling unit developed as a group of dwelling units clustered around a common area pursuant to SVMC 19.40.050 as now adopted or hereafter amended. Dwelling, duplex:An attached building designed exclusively for occupancy by two families, with separate entrances and individual facilities for cooking, sleeping, and sanitation, but sharing a common or party wall or stacked. See "Residential, use category." Dwelling,single-family:A building, manufactured or modular home or portion thereof, designed exclusively for single-family residential purposes,with a separate entrance and facilities for cooking, sleeping, and sanitation. See "Residential, use category." Dwelling, multifamily:A building designed for occupancy by three or more families, with separate entrances and individual facilities for cooking, sleeping, and sanitation. Townhouses are not considered multifamily development. See "Residential, use category. Dwelling, townhouse:A single-family dwelling unit constructed in groups of three or more attached units in which each unit extends from foundation to roof, open on at least two sides. See "Residential, use category." Dwelling unit: One or more rooms, designed, occupied, or intended for occupancy as separate living quarters, with an individual entrance, cooking, sleeping, and sanitary facilities for the exclusive use of one family maintaining a household. Page 8 of 8 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: September 8, 2020 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ® new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑Admin. Report ❑ pending legislation ❑executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Second Reading Ordinance No. 20-010 Essential Public Facilities (EPF) Code Text Amendment—CTA-2020-0002 GOVERNING LEGISLATION: SVMC 17.80.150; SVMC 19.30.040; SVMC 19.90; and SVMC 19.60; RCW 36.70A.106; and 36.70A.200; WAC 365-196-550 PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: August 11, 2020 Admin report; August 25, 2020 First Ordinance Reading BACKGROUND: The proposed amendment is a City-initiated code text amendment to the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) chapter 19.90 SVMC and chapter 19.65 SVMC to prohibit locally significant EPFs in residential zones, allow EPFs in the Mixed Use Zone, and other housekeeping items. The City regulates EPFs pursuant to chapter 19.90 SVMC. The current regulations categorize the uses as statewide, regionally, or locally significant and identifies the procedural process. The permitted use matrix in SVMC 19.60.050 identifies the zones where EPFs are allowed. Currently EPFs are allowed in all zones except Mixed Use and Parks and Open Space. Although the City cannot prohibit the siting of EPFs within the City limits, the City can prohibit the siting of EPFs in single-family residential zones so long as there is adequate, appropriate land available in other zones including allowing EPFs in at least one residential zone (in this case the Multi-family zone). At this time the City has proposed a code text amendment to prohibit EPFs in the Single-family Residential zones, allow EPFs in the Mixed Use zone and also proposed reformatting the chapter to improve clarity. The Planning Commission (Commission) conducted a study session on the proposed CTA at the June 11, 2020 meeting. On July 9, 2020, the Commission conducted a public hearing and deliberations. At that meeting, the Commission voted 7-0 to recommend to the City Council that CTA-2020-0002 be approved. On July 23, 2020 the Commission adopted Findings and Recommendation. Potential minor amendment. City Council is currently considering the annual Comprehensive Plan Amendments (CPA) and the second reading for the Comprehensive Plan amendments and implementing regulations is slated for City Council consideration at the September 8, 2020 meeting. One of the proposed amendments will create a new "R- 4" single-family zone that, if approved, will modify the permitted use matrix set forth in SVMC 19.60.050. Accordingly, if adopted the Comprehensive Plan amendments will modify sections that are part of proposed Ordinance 20-010. At the Administrative Report and First Reading, City Council discussed how the addition of the R-4 zone, if adopted, would affect the amendments proposed in Ordinance 20-010. Staff has reviewed the proposed amendments and believes that the primary purpose of Ordinance 20-010 is to amend necessary SVMC sections to remove local EPFs from single-family zones. Thus, if City Council desired to keep with the primary purpose and amend the proposed changes in Ordinance 20-010 to also include the newly adopted R-4, it would keep with the primary purpose and would constitute a minor change, requiring no public hearing. City Council would need to propose such amendment, and could do so by proposing to modify Ordinance 20-010 to (1) add R-4 to the permitted use matrix with the same designations shown in Ordinance 20-009, (2) showing that EPFs in the R-4 zone have an "E" designation, and (3) adding "R-4" to the single family zones identified in the amended 19.90.020(B). Staff has prepared two proposed motions so City Council may either approve Ordinance 20-010 as presented, or approve Ordinance 20-010 with the modifications to incorporate the R-4 zone if it is adopted and City Council desires to make such change. Staff will address the issue, based on the City Council's action. OPTIONS: Move to approve Ordinance No. 20-010 with or without further amendments, or take other action deemed appropriate. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: 1. Move to approve Ordinance No. 20-010 as proposed; OR 2. Move to approve Ordinance No 20-010 to prohibit local EPFs in single family zones, with modifications to Sections 3 and 4 to incorporate the newly adopted R-4 zone into the amendments as follows: Section 3 of the ordinance: 19.60.050(1) -add R-4 to the permitted use matrix with the same designations shown in Ordinance 20-009, and showing that EPFs in the R-4 zone have an "E" designation, and Section 4 of the ordinance: 19.90.020(B)-add"R-4"to the list of zones where EPF's shall not be permitted. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: N/A STAFF CONTACT: Lori Barlow, AICP, Senior Planner, Community and Public Works Dept. ATTACHMENTS: A. Draft Ordinance No. 20-010 C. Planning Commission's Findings of Fact and recommendation D. Planning Commission Meeting Minutes: 6/11/2020, 7/09/2020, and 7/23/2020 E. Staff Report CTA-2020-0002 DRAFT CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY SPOKANE COUNTY,WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO.20-010 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON AMENDING CHAPTERS 19.60 AND 19.90 OF THE SPOKANE VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE RELATED TO ESSENTIAL PUBLIC FACILITIES,AND OTHER MATTERS RELATING THERETO. WHEREAS,the City of Spokane Valley(City)previously adopted Title 19 of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code(SVMC)relating to zoning and land use regulations,and has made subsequent amendments from time-to-time as appropriate; and WHEREAS, such regulations are authorized by chapter 36.70A RCW; and WHEREAS, City staff have proposed an amendment to the SVMC to amend chapters 19.60 and 19.90 to allow Essential Public Facilities (EPF's) in the Mixed Use (MU) zone and prohibit locally significant EPF's in single family zones; and WHEREAS, on July 30, 2020 the Washington State Depaitnient of Commerce was notified pursuant to RCW 36.70A.106, providing a notice of intent to adopt amendments to Spokane Valley development regulations; and WHEREAS, on June 19 and 26, 2020, notice of the Planning Commission public hearing was published in the Valley News Herald; and WHEREAS,on June 11,2020,the Planning Commission held a study session; and WHEREAS,on July 9, 2020,the Planning Commission held a public hearing,received evidence, information,public testimony, and a staff report with a recommendation,followed by deliberations; and WHEREAS,on July 23,2020,the Planning Commission approved the findings and recommended that City Council adopt the amendments; and WHEREAS, on August 11, 2020, City Council reviewed the proposed amendments, Planning Commission Findings and Recommendations; and WHEREAS, on August 25, 2020 City Council considered a first ordinance reading to adopt the proposed amendment; and WHEREAS,the amendment set forth below is consistent with the goals and policies of the City's Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS,chapters 19.60 and 19.90 SVMC as amended,bear a substantial relation to the public health, safety,welfare and protection of the environment. NOW,THEREFORE,the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley ordains as follows: Section 1. Purpose. The purpose of this Ordinance is to amend chapters 19.60 and 19.90 SVMC to allow EPF's in the MU zone and to prohibit locally significant EPF's in the single family zones within the City of Spokane Valley. Ordinance 20-010—Essential Public Facilities Page 1 of 9 DRAFT Section 2. Findings and Conclusions. The City Council acknowledges that the Planning Commission conducted appropriate investigation and study, held a public hearing on the proposed amendments and recommends approval of the amendments. The City Council has read and considered the Planning Commission's findings. The City Council hereby makes the following findings: A. Growth Management Act Policies - Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA) provides that each city shall adopt a comprehensive land use plan and development regulations that are consistent with and implement the comprehensive plan. B. City of Spokane Valley Goals and Policies-The City of Spokane Valley has adopted goals and policies consistent with the GMA and adopted County-Wide Planning Policies, set forth below. LU-G1 Maintain and enhance the character and quality of life in Spokane Valley. LU-G2 Provide for land uses that are essential to Spokane Valley residents, employees, and visitors. CF-P19 Collaborate with Spokane County jurisdictions in determining the best locations for public and private essential public facilities. LU-P5 Ensure compatibility between adjacent residential and commercial or industrial uses. LU-P7 Protect residential neighborhoods from incompatible land uses and adverse impacts associated with transportation corridors. H-P4 Enable the creation of housing for resident individuals and families needing assistance from social and human service providers. CF-G1 Coordinate with special districts,other jurisdictions,and the private sector to effectively and affordably provide facilities and services. C. Conclusions 1. The proposed amendment bears substantial relation to public health, safety, welfare and protection of the environment. Precluding locally significant EPFs in the single-family residential zones protects the character of the existing single family residential uses and allows those EPFs that have a residential component to locate in other mixed use or high density residential zones. The proposed amendment protects residential neighborhoods from incompatible land uses and provides for EPFs that require a residential character. The amendment addresses community concerns and protects community character. The amendment will also direct locally significant EPFs into zones and sites more suitable and allow for more efficient processing and permitting of the necessary services they provide. 2. The proposed City-initiated Code text amendment is consistent with the City's adopted Comprehensive Plan and the approval criteria pursuant to SVMC 17.80.150(F). Section 3. Amendment. Chapter 19.60 SVMC is hereby amended as follows: Ordinance 20-010—Essential Public Facilities Page 2 of 9 DRAFT 19.60.040 Explanation of table abbreviations. The following describe the abbreviations used in SVMC 19.60.050, Permitted uses matrix: A. Permitted uses are designated with a"P."Permitted uses are allowable uses within a zoning district. B. Conditional uses are designated with a"C."Conditional uses are authorized pursuant to Chapter 19.150 SVMC, Conditional Use Permits. C. Regional sitingEssential Public Facility (EPF) uses are designated with an "RE." Regional Essential Public Facility uses are of statewide, regional/countywide or local significance. EPF's shall be subject to They are authorized pursuant to Cchapter 19.90 SVMC, Essential Public Facilities (EPFs). D. Uses subject to supplemental use regulations are designated with an"S."The Supplemental regulations are set forth in Chapter 19.65 SVMC and shall apply to the corresponding supplemental uses listed in SVMC 19.60.050,Permitted uses matrix. E. Prohibited uses are designated with a blank cell. 19.60.050 Permitted uses matrix. Parks and Mixed Open Residential Use Commercial Industrial Space R- R- R- 1 2 3 MFR MU CMU NC RC IMU I POS Agriculture and Animal Animal processing/handling P Animal raising and/or keeping SS S S S S Animal shelter S P P Beekeeping, commercial P Beekeeping, hobby S S S Community garden SS S S S S S Greenhouse/nursery, commercial P P P Kennel S S S S P P Orchard, tree farming, commercial P P Riding stable P P C Communication Facilities Radio/TV broadcasting studio P P P P Repeater facility PPP P P P P P Small cell deployment SS S S S S S S S S S Telecommunication wireless antenna array SS S S S S S S S S Ordinance 20-010—Essential Public Facilities Page 3 of 9 DRAFT Parks and Mixed Open Residential Use Commercial Industrial Space R- R- R- 1 2 3 MFR MU CMU NC RC IMU I POS Telecommunication wireless support tower SS S S S S S S S S Tower, ham operator SS S S S S S S S S Community Services Community hall, club, or lodge PP P P P P P Church, temple, mosque, synagogue and PPP P P P P P house of worship Crematory P P P P Funeral home P P Transitional housing C Day Care Day care, adult PPP P P P P P P P Day care, child(12 children or fewer) PPP P P P P P P P Day care, child(13 children or more) CCC P P P P P P P Eating and Drinking Establishment P P P P P P S Education Schools, college or university P P P Schools, K through 12 PPP P P P P P Schools,professional,vocational and trade P P P P P P schools Schools, specialized training/studios P P P P Entertainment Adult entertainment and retail S Casino P P P Cultural facilities P P P P Exercise facility S S S S Off-road recreational vehicle use P P Major event entertainment P P P Racecourse P P P P Racetrack P P Recreational facility P P P P P P Theater,indoor P P P Group Living Ordinance 20-010—Essential Public Facilities Page 4 of 9 DRAFT Parks and Mixed Open Residential Use Commercial Industrial Space R- R- R- 1 2 3 MFR MU CMU NC RC IMU I POS Assisted living/convalescent/nursing home PP P P Community residential facilities(6 residents PPP P P P or less) Community residential facilities(greater P P P than 6 and under 25 residents) Dwelling,congregate P P P Industrial,Heavy Assembly,heavy P Hazardous waste treatment and storage S S Manufacturing,heavy P Processing,heavy P Mining S Industrial,Light Assembly,light P P P P P Manufacturing,light P P P Processing,light P P Recycling facility S S S S Industrial service P P Lodging Bed and breakfast PPP P P Hotel/motel P P P P S Recreational vehicle park/campground S Marijuana Uses Marijuana club or lounge Marijuana cooperative Marijuana processing S S Marijuana production S S Marijuana sales S S S Marijuana transporter S S S Medical S P P P P P Office Animal clinic/veterinary S S S S S Ordinance 20-010-Essential Public Facilities Page 5 of 9 DRAFT Parks and Mixed Open Residential Use Commercial Industrial Space R- R- R- 1 2 3 MFR MU CMU NC RC IMU I POS Office,professional PP P P P PP Parks and Open Space Cemetery P P P Golf course PPP P P PP P Golf driving range CCC C P C PPP Parks PPP P P P P P P Public/Quasi-Public Community facilities PPPPPP P P PPP Essential public facilities RE RE RE RE E RE RE RE RE RE Public utility local distribution facility SS S S S S S P PP S Public utility transmission facility SS S S S S S S SS S Tower,wind turbine support S S S S Residential Dwelling, accessory units S S S S S S S S Dwelling, caretaker's residence S S S S S Dwelling, cottage SS S S Dwelling, duplex PP P P Dwelling,industrial accessory dwelling unit S S Dwelling, multifamily P P P Dwelling, single-family PPP P P P P Dwelling, townhouse SS S S S Manufactured home park S S Retail Sales and Service PP S P PS S Transportation Airstrip,private P P Battery charging stations SSSPPP P P PPS Electric vehicle infrastructure PP P P P PP Heliport P P Helistop C C P Parking facility— controlled access PP P P P Railroad yard,repair shop and roundhouse P Ordinance 20-010—Essential Public Facilities Page 6 of 9 DRAFT Parks and Mixed Open Residential Use Commercial Industrial Space R- R- R- 1 2 3 MFR MU CMU NC RC IMU I POS Transit center P P P P P Vehicle Services Automobile impound yard P P Automobile/taxi rental P P P P P Automobile parts, accessories and tires P P P P P Automobile/truck/RV/motorcycle painting, P P P P repair,body and fender works Car wash P P S P P P Farm machinery sales and repair P P P Fueling station P P S P P P Heavy truck and industrial vehicles sales, P P rental,repair and maintenance Passenger vehicle, boat, and RV sales, P P P service and repair Towing P P P P Truck stop P P Warehouse,Wholesale, and Freight Movement Auction house P P P Auction yard (excluding livestock) P P Catalog and mail order houses P P P P P Cold storage/food locker P P Freight forwarding P P Grain elevator P P Storage, general indoor P P S P P P Storage, general outdoor S S S S P P Storage, self-service facility P P P P P P Tank storage, critical material above ground S S Tank storage, critical material below ground S S S Tank storage, LPG above ground S S S S S S Warehouse P P P P P Wholesale business P P P P P Ordinance 20-010—Essential Public Facilities Page 7 of 9 DRAFT Section 4. Amendment. Chapter 19.90 SVMC is hereby amended as follows: 19.90.005 Essential Public Facilities procedures A. General. All Essential Public Facilities(EPFs)shall be subject to the requirements of this section. B. Determination of Scope. The City is signatory to an interlocal agreement relating to the siting of EPFs of statewide and regional significance in accordance with RCW 36.70A.200. 1. Application for EPF siting shall initially be made through the Spokane County depaitnient of planning and building(or similar applicable department if modified)in accordance with the adopted procedures of Spokane County. 2. The Board of County Commissioners will make a determination of whether an EPF has regional/statewide significance or is of local significance. C. All EPFs located within the City shall be subject to the conditional use permit approval process and shall require a conditional use permit, subject to any limitations on that process pursuant to applicable law regarding siting of EPFs of regional/statewide significance. D. Spokane Valley shall require EPFs approved through the regional/statewide siting process in SVMC 19.90.010 to meet all applicable SVMC requirements except those expressly obviated as a result of that regional/statewide siting process. The City shall consider all information submitted as part of the regional/statewide siting process. E. EPFs of regional/statewide significance shall be further subject to the siting process and requirements of SVMC 19.90.010. EPFs of local significance shall be further subject to the siting process and requirements of SVMC 19.90.020. 19.90.010 Essential Public Facilities of regional/statewide significance. significant in accordance with RCW 36.70A.200. A. EPFs having statewide significance are major facilities that provide a needed public service affecting, or potentially affecting, residents and/or property located in two or more Washington state counties and may be included on the Washington State Office of Financial Management list of EPFs. These facilities include,but are not limited to,regional transportation facilities, such as commercial and military airports; freeways, highways, and beltways; state correctional facilities; secure community transitional facilities; state social services; state parks; and state higher educational facilities. B. EPFs having regional/countywide significance are local or interlocal facilities providing a needed public service affecting,or potentially affecting,residents and/or property located in two or more Spokane County jurisdictions. They include,but are not limited to, general aviation airports; county correctional facilities; regional transportation system; public transit maintenance and operational facilities; regional solid waste disposal/recycling/composting/handling facilities; community colleges; regional wastewater treatment facilities; arenas, stadiums, and other entertainment facilities; and regional social and health services such as in-patient hospitals,mental health facilities, and substance abuse treatment centers. Chapter 19.60 SVMC, Permitted Uses, identifies those facilities subject to the Statewide/Regional EPFs shall be sited through the applicable- regional/statewide siting process, including applicable procedures established pursuant to any interlocal agreement between the City and Spokane County. C. Application for EPF siting shall be made through the Spokane County department of planning and building in accordance with the adopted procedures of Spokane County. D. Following ranking of sites by the board of county commissioners,the applicant shall work directly with the City to meet the regulatory Ordinance 20-010—Essential Public Facilities Page 8 of 9 DRAFT requirements for the construction and operation of the facility under the plans and regulations that were in effect at the time of initial application under the regional siting process. D.Following ranking of sites by the board of county commissioners, the applicant shall work directly with the City to meet the regulatory requirements for the construction and operation of the facility under the plans and regulations that were in effect at the time of initial application under the regional siting process. E. All EPFs located within the City require approval of a conditional use permit pursuant to Chapter 19.150 SVMC, Conditional Use Permits. F. Spokane Valley shall require EPFs approved through the regional process to meet all local requirements except those expressly obviated as a result of the process.The City shall consider all information submitted as part of the regional siting process. 19.90.020 Essential Public Facilities of lbocal significance. A. EPFs having local significance are facilities providing a needed public service affecting, or potentially affecting,only residents and/or property within the jurisdiction in which they are located.The City includes such facilities in the Comprehensive Plan as "community facilities," including, but not limited to, fire stations, police stations, child care facilities, public libraries, community parks, recreation facilities, community centers, local social services, and elementary, middle, and high schools. B. All EPFs having local significance may only be permitted in the MFR, MU, CMU,NC, RC, IMU, and I zones and shall not be permitted in the R-1, R-2, or R-3 zones. Section 5. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance shall be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section,sentence,clause,or phrase of this Ordinance. Section 6. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect five days after publication of this Ordinance or a summary thereof in the official newspaper of the City of Spokane Valley as provided by law. Passed by the City Council this day of September,2020. ATTEST: Ben Wick,Mayor Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Approved as to Form: Office of the City Attorney Date of Publication: Effective Date: Ordinance 20-010—Essential Public Facilities Page 9 of 9 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE SPOKANE VALLEY PLANNING COMMISSION CTA-2020-0002 Proposed Amendment to Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) Pursuant to SVMC 17.80.150(E) the Planning Commission shall consider the proposal and shall prepare and forward a recommendation to the City Council following the public hearing. The following findings are consistent with the Planning Commission recommendation. Background: 1. Pursuant to RCW 36.70A.130, Spokane Valley adopted its 2016 Comprehensive Plan Update and updated development regulations on December 13,2016,with December 28,2016 as the effective date. 2. CTA-2020-0002 is a City-initiated text amendment to the SVMC, amending chapter 19.90 of the SVMC and SVMC 19.60.050 to prohibit locally significant Essential Public Facilities (EPFs) in the single-family residential zones, to allow EPFs in the Mixed Use Zone, and to address other housekeeping items. 3. The Planning Commission held a properly noticed public hearing and conducted deliberations on July 9,2020. The Commissioners voted 7-0 to recommend that the City Council adopt the amendment. Planning Commission Findings: 1. Compliance with SVMC 17.80.150(F)Approval Criteria a. The proposed text amendment is consistent with the applicable provisions of the Comprehensive Plan. Findings: The proposed amendment is supported by the Comprehensive Plan and is consistent with the following goals and policies: LU-G 1 Maintain and enhance the character and quality of life in Spokane Valley. LU-G2 Provide for land uses that are essential to Spokane Valley residents, employees, and visitors. CF-P19 Collaborate with Spokane County jurisdictions in determining the best locations for public and private essential public facilities. LU-P5 Ensure compatibility between adjacent residential and commercial or industrial uses LU-P7 Protect residential neighborhoods from incompatible land uses and adverse impacts associated with transportation corridors. H-P4 Enable the creation of housing for resident individuals and families needing assistance from social and human service providers. CF-G1 Coordinate with special districts, other jurisdictions,and the private sector to effectively and affordably provide facilities and services. Conclusion: The proposed text amendment is supported by the Comprehensive Plan and consistent with the goals and policies. b. The proposed amendment bears a substantial relation to public health, safety,welfare and protection of the environment. Findings and Recommendations of the Spokane Valley Planning Commission CTA-2020-0002 Page 1 of 2 Findings: The proposed amendment bears substantial relation to public health, safety, welfare and protection of the environment. Precluding locally significant EPFs in the single family residential zones protects the character of the existing single family residential uses and allows those EPFs that have a residential component to located in other mixed use or high density residential zones. The proposed amendment protects residential neighborhoods from incompatible land uses and provides for EPFs that require a residential character. The amendment addresses community concerns and protects community character. The amendment will also direct locally significant EPFs into zones and sites more suitable and allow for more efficient processing and permitting of the necessary services they provide. Conclusion: The proposed text amendment is consistent with Comprehensive Plan and bears a substantial relation to public health, safety,welfare,and protection of the environment. 2. Recommendation: The Spokane Valley Planning Commission therefore recommends the City Council approve CTA-2020- 0002 as proposed. Attachment: Exhibit 1 —Proposed Amendment CTA-2020-0002 Approved this 23rd day of July,2020 arming Commission airman ATTEST Marianne Lemons,Office Assistant Findings and Recommendations of the Spokane Valley Planning Commission CTA-2020-0002 Page 2 of 2 Regular Meeting Minutes Spokane Valley Planning Commission Council Chambers—City Hall June 11,2020 I. Chair Johnson called the meeting to order at 6:02 p.m. The meeting was held remotely via ZOOM meeting. II, Commissioners, staff and audience stood for the pledge of allegiance. III. Secretary to the Commission Deanna Horton took roll and the following members and staff were present: Erik Lamb, City Attorney Fred Beaulac Jenny Nickerson, Building Official Walt Haneke Lori Barlow, Senior Planner James Johnson Chaz Bates, Senior Planner Danielle Kaschmitter Mike Basinger, Economic Development Timothy Kelley Manager Robert McKinley Taylor Dillard, Administrative Sherri Robinson Assistant Marianne Lemons, Office Assistant Deanna Horton, Secretary to Planning Commission IV. AGENDA: Commissioner Kaschmitter made a motion to approve the June 11, 2020 agenda as presented. There was no discussion. The vote on the motion was seven in favor, zero against and the motion passed. V. MINUTES; Commissioner Kaschmitter made a motion to approve the May 14, 2020 minutes as presented. There was no discussion. The vote on the motion was seven in favor, zero against and the motion passed VI. COMMISSION REPORTS: Chairman Johnson reported that he has continued to attend the Spokane County Human Rights Task Force meetings. VII. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT: Building Official Nickerson thanked the commission for adjusting to the new Zoom meeting platform. VIII. PUBLIC COMMENT: There was no public comment. IX. COMMISSION BUSINESS: a. Study Session: CTA-2020-0001: A proposed change to Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) 19.180,Newly Annexed Areas Economic Development Manager Mike Basinger gave a presentation to the commission explaining the city initiated code text amendment that will amend Chapter 19.180 of the SVMC to clarify the process and criteria to annex adjacent and contiguous areas into the city and to ensure that the fiscal impacts of providing the facilities,utilities, services, and maintenance of the annexation area are adequately considered prior to annexation, Deputy City Attorney Erik Lamb provided additional information regarding annexation. He explained that the amendment will clarify the annexation process for the three types of 1 06-11-2020 Planning Commission Minutes Page 2 of 6 annexation requests: voter initiated, City Council initiated and direct petition. It will outline the criteria that will be evaluated including existing and new facilities, services, expenses and revenues. It will also clearly identify the process to address zoning upon annexation. Chair Johnson asked for clarification regarding zoning for specific parcels as they request to annex into the city limits. Mr. Basinger answered that when the city annexes a property it is zoned with a designation that:is the most similar to its current designation with the County. It will then be brought through the amendment process to evaluate what the zoning should be and go through the public process to make that final designation. Chairman Johnson asked for information regarding financial impact, He asked if a property would still be considered for annexation if it is found that the tax value received would be lower than the cost to the city. Mr. Basinger answered that this criteria will just be used as guidelines for the Council to consider when they make those decisions regarding annexation. b. Study Session: CTA Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendments Mr. Basinger explained that local jurisdictions are allowed to make amendments to the Comprehensive Plan once each year. There are five proposed amendments that will be considered during 2020; four map amendments and one text amendment. A public hearing will be held on June 25, 2020. Notice of hearing will be published twice prior to the fifteen day requirement, the site was posted with a"Notice of Hearing" sign, and individual notice was mailed to all residents within a 400 foot radius of the subject properties. After the public hearing, the request will move to Council where they will review Planning Commission findings, consider the public hearing, and approve/modify/deny the request. The floor was given to Senior Planner Chaz Bates to discuss the details of each proposed amendment. CPA-2020-000.1: Request to change the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation from Single Family Residential(SFR) to Corridor Mixed Use(CMU) and to change the Zoning District,from Single Family Residential Urban (R-3)to Corridor Mixed Use(CMU). Mr. Bates said that this amendment is privately initiated for the property located at 1311 N McDonald Road, between Mission and Broadway. It is owned by Land Use Solutions and Entitlement. The request is to rezone the property from single-family residential (R-3) to Corridor Mixed Use (CMU). The property to the east is zoned multi-family, the property to the south is corridor mixed use, and the west and south are zoned single family residential. Findings show there are no critical areas on the site, the site would support the redevelopment of the parcel, is supported by the transportation network, and is compatible with the surrounding uses. CPA-2020-0002: Request to change the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation from Industrial(I) to Regional Commercial(RC) and to change the Zoning District from Industrial(I) to Regional Commercial(RC). 2 06-1 1-2020 Planning Commission Minutes Page 3 of 6 • Mr. Bates stated that this amendment is a privately initiated request for the property located off of Sprague and Fancier and is owned by Lawrence B. Stone Properties. The request is to convert the zoning on 3 acres of land from Industrial (1)to Regional Commercial (RC). The properties to the north are zoned industrial and the property to the south and the west are regional commercial. Findings show that there are no critical areas,the site is completely paved,the change would support redevelopment of an underused property, is supported by the transportation network and is compatible with the surrounding uses. CPA-2020-0003: Request to change the Comprehensive Plrar Land Use Designation from Multifamily Residential(MFR) to Corridor Mixed Use (CMU) and to change the Zoning District from Multifamily ily Residential(MFR) to Corridor Mixed Use(CMU). Mr. Bates stated that this amendment is a privately initiated request for the property located south of Mission and west of Pines and is owned by Jay Rambo. The request is to convert the zoning of 6.24 acres from Multifamily Residential (MFR)to Corridor Mixed Use(CMU). The properties to the west is corridor mixed use,the north is industrial, the east is corridor mixed use and the south is single family residential. Findings show that there are no critical areas, the site supports redevelopment of an underused property, is supported by the transportation network and is compatible with the surrounding uses. A trip generation and distribution letter was completed by the City of Spokane Valley's Senior Engineer and shows a net increase of traffic volumes of one car during the PM peak hour. All other times of the day remain the same. Commissioner Haneke asked if the developer wants to build additional apartment buildings on the property and expressed concern about traffic flow in the area. Mr. Bates answered that this zoning designation would allow for additional multifamily dwelling units or retail. Attorney Lamb responded that the analysis done for this change shows the change from multi-family to corridor mixed use, it is not for a specific proposal. The current zoning of multi-family allows for a significant amount of trips. Corridor mixed use zoning will add more flexibility of uses but according to the traffic study it should not impact the traffic flow more than one car during the peak PM period. Commissioner I(aschmitter asked about the open space requirement for corridor mixed use designation. Building Official Nickerson responded that there are different requirements in the current Spokane Valley Municipal code between multifamily versus corridor mixed use zones. Multifamily does require open space but corridor mixed use does not. If open space was still required, Mission Park would provide the multifamily open space requirement. CPA-2020-0006: Request to change the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation from Industrial(I) to Corridor Mixed Use (CMU) and to change the Zoning District from Industrial(I) to Corridor Mixed Use (CMU). Mr. Bates stated that this amendment is a city-initiated request to change the 9 acre property located at 3830 N Sullivan Rd from Industrial (I) to Corridor Mixed Use(CMU). The property is owned by East Valley School District(EVSD) and currently houses the district's Walker Center. This location includes the EVSD administrative services and maintenance 3 06-11-2020 Planning Commission Minutes Page 4 of 6 building. The properties to the west, north, and east are all industrial uses, and to the south are retail service and industrial uses. Findings show that there are no critical areas, supports expanded educational uses, is supported by the transportation network, and is compatible with the surrounding areas. The proposed amendment allows flexibility so that that EVSD can provide educational services in this location. Education services are prohibited in the industrial zone and EVSD would like to move their Parent/Partner program to this location. CPA-2020-0007: Amend Chapter 2 Goals and Policies to provide policy guidance for increased housing density with access to support services like transit and corrrntercial services, and provide implementing regulations. Mr. Basinger said that this is a city initiated text amendment that will apply city-wide. It will address alternative housing types such as duplexes, cottages, and townhomes. It is policy language that will help protect residential neighborhoods by incentivizing alternative housing in areas that are supported by existing infrastructure. Staff is proposing an area-wide rezone in hopes to address concerns from the residents regarding the influx of duplex developments and provide appropriate locations for alternative housing. The objective of this amendment is to address those concerns by creating areas that can support denser housing because of its location to transit and services. The vision is that there will be a larger variety of housing types available for residents and will help with housing affordability. The proposal will rezone 1218 acres within the City limits to the new zoning district,R-4. There is 57 vacant acres and 67 acres that are partially used. Studies show that there is potential for 1240 housing units which would lead to 3100 new residents. The proposed area is surrounded by multifamily and corridor mixed use zoning districts. The code text amendment will create the R-4 zone in the code and provide a description and outline permitted uses. The change specifies that duplex development in the R-3 zone shall have a minimum,lot size of 14,500 square feet. There is also an additional text change in the Appendix A definitions that states that townhouses are not considered multifamily. Mr. Basinger stated that staffs analysis shows that single family development will incentivize the R-3 zone because the change will allow eight single family units per acre. The new R-4 zone will promote development of alternative housing types in those areas where transit and services are available giving a greater variety of housing types in areas that can handle an influx of residents. Commissioner McKinley asked what the ultimate intent is for the amendment. Mr. Basinger answered that the vision is to offer a variety of alternative housing within the city. Staff is optimistic that due to the density change in this amendment,the City might see some cottage or townhome developments that would offer more affordable options. Commissioner Kaschmitter asked if the Appleway Trail could be extended. She also asked if Spokane Transit Authority is considering making their services more frequent in this area. Mr. Basinger answered that there are plans to extend the Appleway Trail to Dishman Hills. The Transit Authority is optimistic that they would be able to extend their services as more development happens. They feel that more demand would drive them to offer additional services. Commissioner Beaulac asked about the notification process for the properties affected by this change. 4 06-11-2020 Planning Commission Minutes Page 5 of 6 Mr. Basinger answered that the public hearing has been published twice in the newspaper, it will be sent to the Comprehensive Plan distribution list that includes any person that has ever signed up to receive notifications about comprehensive plan changes (approximately 370 people), it will be published on all of the City's social media platforms, and a media release will be sent out prior to the public hearing. Chairman Johnson asked for clarification about sending notification out regarding the City- wide rezone. Mr. Basinger responded that the City does not send out letters to individual property owners when a City-wide rezone is done. However, staff hopes that the additional notices on social media, press releases, and the distribution list will get the word out to the residents about the change. c. Study Session: CTA-2020-0002.A proposed change to Spokane Valley Municipal Code 19.90,Essential Public Facilities. Senior Planner Lori Barlow gave a presentation on the city-initiated code text amendment to amend regulations on essential public facilities(EPF). The proposal is to prohibit locally significant essential public facilities in residential zones. She explained that essential public facilities are facilities that are typically hard to site because of their size and the nature of' their use. These facilities include state and local correctional facilities, solid waste handling facilities, inpatient facilities which includes substance abuse facilities,mental health group homes and secure community transition facilities. Pursuant to the Growth Management Act, cities and counties are required to have procedures to site essential public facilities. They can't be precluded from being allowed within the city limits. However,the City can control the zones where they are located. This request is to preclude all of the residential zones; R-1, R-2, and R-3. The reason for this change is because there have been numerous detoxification facilities proposed within the City limits in the last few years. There was a controversial public hearing held recently for a detoxification center that wanted to move into a residential zone. Staff made the decision that it would be appropriate to look at making a change to limit the zones where these types of facilities can be sited. The City regulates essential public facilities pursuant to chapter 19.90 SVMC. The current regulations stipulate that a conditional use permit(CUP) is required for all essential public facilities to address any possible impacts. Currently, essential public facilities are allowed in all zones except mixed use and parks and open space. Chairman Johnson asked if the new R-4 zone would also be included. Ms. Barlow answered that the City will probably look to exclude that zone if it is created but the current code text amendment only addresses the zones that are in the code right now. Chairman Johnson asked the timefranue for this amendment, Ms. Barlow answered that the public hearing will be held in July,the findings of fact at the following meeting and then moving onto the City Council for their review and decision. X. GOOD OF THE ORDER: The Commissioners welcomed Commissioner Haneke to the board. Commissioner McKinley asked for an update regarding opening the City Hall for in person meetings. 5 06-11-2020 Planning Commission Minutes Page 6 of 6 Ms. Nickerson answered that the governor's order for COVID phase three does include allowing face-to-face with customers for government facilities. However, there is no date yet for when phase three will begin. The City has begun preparations for when opening does happen and is putting protocols in place to keep people safe while they are in City Hall. XI. ADJOURNMENT: Commissioner McKinley made a motion to adjourn the meeting at 8:06 pm. The vote on the motion was seven in favor, zero against, and the motion passed - e27 27/0 0 Z James ohnson, Cha r Date signed Deanna Horton, Secretary 6 Regular Meeting Minutes Spokane Valley Planning Commission Council Chambers—City Hall July 9,2020 I. Chair Johnson called the meeting to order at 6:01 p.m. The meeting was held remotely via ZOOM meeting. Il. Commissioners, staff and audience stood for the pledge of allegiance. III. Secretary to the Commission Deanna Horton took roll and the following members and staff were present: Fred Beaulac Erik Lamb,Deputy City Attorney Walt Haneke Jenny Nickerson,Building Official James Johnson Lori Barlow, Senior Planner Danielle Kaschmitter Mike Basinger, Economic Development Manager Timothy Kelley Marianne Lemons, Office Assistant Robert McKinley Taylor Dillard,Administrative Assistant Sheen Robinson IV. AGENDA: Commissioner Kaschmitter moved to approve the agenda for July 9,2020,with the exception of removing the corrected draft minutes from June 11, 2020, due to a technical error. There was no discussion. The vote on the motion was seven in favor, zero against and the motion passed. V. MINUTES: Commissioner Kaschrnitter moved to approve the minutes for June 25,2020 minutes as presented. Chairman Johnson moved to amend the stated location of the parcels for CPA-2020-0003 from south of Mission to north of Mission. The vote on the amendment was seven in favor, zero against and the amendment passed. The vote on the amended motion was seven in favor, zero against and the motion passed. VI. COMMISSION REPORTS: There were no Commission reports. VII. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT: Jenny Nickerson,Building Official offered a suggestion for the Planning Commission to voice their concerns with staff prior to the meeting so staff can provide information and acknowledge those concerns during their presentation. Mike Basinger, Economic Development Manager stated that the Planning Commission use the staff as their resource. VIII. PUBLIC COMMENT: There was no public comment. IX. COMMISSION BUSINESS: a. Public Hearing: CTA-2020-0001.A proposed amendment to Spokane Valley Municipal Code(SVMC) 19.180 Annexations. 1 07-09-2020 Planning Commission Minutes Page 2 ad The Public Hearing was opened at 6:10 pm. Mike Basinger, Economic Development Manager explained the code text amendment would amend Chapter 19.180 of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) to provide further clarification for annexations. He explained that the only areas that can be considered for annexation must be in the Urban Growth Area.The city has received many informal inquiries regarding annexation and during these discussions, staff determined the existing regulations for annexation needs to be expanded to provide clear direction to potential applicants and staff regarding these requests. He stated that the proposed code text amendment will provide criteria to evaluate annexations. The criteria includes the impacts on existing residents,the ability to serve the new area at the adopted level of services, the financial impacts of the annexation and the methods for determining zoning upon annexation. Chairman Johnson expressed concern regarding the financial analysis criteria and that it may show that the area being annexed will not pay for itself. He also mentioned that the economic evaluation is a piece of information that the Planning Commission should utilize to help inform their decision. Mr.Basinger stated he appreciated Chairman Johnson's comment and that this is one of many criteria used to evaluate annexations. Deputy City Attorney, Erik Lamb stated that the criteria is not in any particular order and that City Council may approve or disapprove any annexation that comes forward. The meeting was open up for public testimony. No public testimony was offered on this matter. The public hearing was closed at 6:18. Commissioner Kaschmitter moved to recommend approval of CTA-2020-0001 to City Council. Commission Haneke added that people spend money in the city,which creates additional revenues for the surrounding businesses. Commission Robinson commented that residential areas in the county would still be using the city's infrastructure and that it would be beneficial if those residential areas were in the city. The vote on the motion was seven in favor, zero against and the motion passed. b. Public Hearing: CTA-2020-0002. A proposed amendment to Chapter 19.90 Essential Public Facilities SVMC and Chapter 19.60 Permitted Uses SVMC. The Public Hearing was opened at 6:18 pm. Senior Planner, Lori Barlow explained that this code text amendment would modify regulations for essential public facilities. Ms. Barlow explained that it would prohibit Essential Public Facilities (EPFs) from locating in residential zones and it would allow EPFs in the Mixed Use(MU) zone, Ms. Barlow explained that the proposed changes to Chapter 19.90 SVMC will reformat the regulations to highlight the process and then specifically add language to the regulations applicable to locally significant EPFs. She stated that the language added to the last section of 19.90 specifically states that EPFs with local significance are not permitted in the R-1, R-2, or R-3 zones. Ms. Barlow highlighted that the city does have the ability to determine which zone locally significant EPFs may be located in as long as there are adequate areas in the city that can provide for these EPFs. She stated that through this process, it has been determined that locally significant EPFs are not compatible with the single-family residential zones. The proposal is to prohibit locally significant EPFs from locations in the R-1,R-2, and R-3 zones. 2 07-09-2020 Planning Commission Minutes Page 3 of 4 Commissioner Beaulac asked about adding the Multi-Family residential zone to the R-1, R-2 or R-3 zones. Ms. Barlow explained that there are some EPFs designed to be in residential zones so it was determined that allowing these to be in the Multi-Family residential zone would meet the need for these locally significant EPFs to be located in a residential setting while still preserving the character of the other residential zones. Commissioner Beaulac asked for an example of what would be allowed in the Multi-Family residential zone for EPFs. Ms. Barlow explained a brief history of what prompted this amendment and gave an example of a small scale detox center. Commissioner Robinson requested clarification for facilities like NAOMI and other women's shelters. There was a short discussion on what services those shelters would need to provide to be considered and EPF. Commission Kaschmitter requested clarification on state and regional correctional facilities and if they could be included. Ms. Barlow answered that those would not be locally significant and they would have to go through the siting process with the Board of County Commissioners. She further explained the process that these EPFs would have to go through to determine the most suitable locations. The meeting was open up for public testimony. No public testimony was offered on this matter. The public hearing was closed at 6:32. Commissioner Kaschmitter moved to recommend approval of CTA-2020-0002 to City Council. Commissioner Beaulac stated that he would like to see Multi-Family residential added to the list of residential zones that EPFs could not locate in. Mr. Lamb provided clarification that an identified residential zone should be left as a potential zone for EPFs to locate. Chairman Johnson stated that these are essential services and moving them to a Multi-Family zone will make it more expensive to create these facilities. Commissioner McKinley stated that he is in favor of these facilities moving from the R-1,R-2, and R-3 zones. The vote on the motion was seven in favor, zero against and the motion passed. X. GOOD OF THE ORDER: Commissioner Kelley read a statement regarding core values. He stated the importance of the commissioner's votes during the election of officers and for the comprehensive plan amendments. He asked the commissioners to bring their core values to each meeting. He welcomed the new commissioners to be a part of the conversation. Commissioner Robinson thanked everyone for their patience and stated that although she cannot change her vote on CPA-2020-0007 from the June 25,2020 meeting but she wishes she could. She provided further information as to why she's reached this decision and going forward she will be in support of the R-4 zone. Commissioner McKinley offered a reminder that tax returns are due Wednesday, July 15, 2020. He also thanked staff for their work on the EPFs. Commissioner Kaschmitter thanked the commission for caring about the community and thanked staff for their patience. Chairman Johnson thanked staff and mentioned that the commission should never question staffs motives. He stated he is in favor of medium density. XI. ADJOURNMENT: Commissioner McKinley made a motion to adjourn the meeting at 6:48 pm. The vote on the motion was seven in favor, zero against, and the motion passed. 3 07-09-2020 Planning Commission Minutes Page 4 of 4 dam• ‘07,12 C�C7 James ohnson, Chair Date signed i--4-neic_ 446-k-) Deanna Iloiton, Secretary 4 Regular Meeting Minutes Spokane Valley Planning Commission Council Chambers—City Hall July 23rd,2020 I. Chair Johnson called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m.The meeting was held remotely via ZOOM meeting. II. Commissioners, staff and audience stood for the pledge of allegiance. III. Administrative Assistant Taylor Dillard took roll and the following members and staff were present: Fred Beaulac, (Joined ilf 6:25 pm) Eric Lamb, Deputy City Attorney Walt Haneke Jenny Nickerson,Building Official James Johnson Mike Basinger,Economic Development Manager Danielle Kaschmitter Lori Barlow, Senior Planner Tim Kelley Chaz Bates, Senior Planner Bob McKinley Taylor Dillard,Administrative Assistant Sherri Robinson Marianne Lemons, Office Assistant There was a consensus from the Planning Commission to excuse Commissioner Beaulac from the meeting, IV. AGENDA: Commissioner Kaschmitter moved to approve the July 23,2020 agenda as presented. There was no discussion. The vote on the motion was six in favor, zero against and the motion passed V. MINUTES: Commissioner Kaschmitter moved to approve the amended June 11, 2020 minutes as presented. There was no discussion. The vote on the motion was six in favor, zero against and the motion passed. Commissioner Kaschmitter moved to approve the July 9,2020 minutes as presented. There was no discussion. The vote on the motion was six in favor, zero against and the motion passed VI. COMMISSION REPORTS: Chairman Johnson reported that he has continued to attend the Spokane County Human Rights Task Force meetings. The task force sent out nomination forms to find recipients for human rights awards and the winners have been selected. There will be a virtual awards ceremony in September. VH. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT: Building Official Jenny Nickerson reminded the commissioners to drop off their yellow binders to City Hall so they can be used for the City Council packets. Ms.Nickerson also requested that the letter from applicant Jay Rambo regarding CPA-2020-0003 and the agency comments included for CTA-2020-0003 be removed from the Planning Commission Packet. They were included in error. 07-23-2020 Planning Commission Minutes Page 2 of 4 VIII. PUBLIC COMMENT: There was no public comment. IX. COMMISSION BUSINESS: a. Findings of Fact: 2020 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendments Senior Planner Chaz Bates gave a presentation to the commission. He explained that there were two study sessions held on March 6,2020 and June 11, 2020 regarding these amendments. The public hearing was held on June 25,2020 and the Planning Commission deliberated on each amendment individually and came up with recommendations to be submitted to the City Council. The Planning Commission voted to recommend approval of CPA-2020-0001, CPA-2020-0002, and CPA-2020-0006. The Planning Commission voted to recommend denial of CPA-2020-0003 and CPA-2020-0007. This item is being heard to formalize those findings and the Planning Commission vote on each amendment. Commissioner Kaschmitter moved to approve and forward to City Council the findings and recommendation of the Planning Commission for the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendments CPA-2020-0001, CPA-2020-0002, CPA-2020-0003, CPA-2020-0006, and CPA-2020-0007. There was no discussion. The vote on the motion was six in favor, zero against and the motion passed. b. Findings Of Fact: CTA-2020-0001,A proposed amendment to Spokane Valley Municipal Code(SVMC) 19.180 Annexations Economic Development Manager Mike Basinger explained that this proposed amendment to the SVMC is to clarify the process and criteria to annex adjacent and contiguous areas in the City and to ensure that the fiscal impacts of providing the facilities, utilities,services, and maintenance of the annexation area are adequately considered prior to annexation. The process included a study session on June 11,2020 and a public hearing on July 9, 2020. The During the public hearing,the Planning Commission voted to recommend approval of the proposed change. This item is being heard to formalize those findings and the Planning Commission vote. Commissioner Kaschmitter moved to approve and forward to City Council the findings and recommendation of the Planning Commission for the proposed amendment to Spokane Valley Municipal Code(SVMC) CTA-2020-0001.There was no discussion. The vote on the motion was six in favor, zero against and the motion passed c. Findings Of Fact: CTA-2020-0002,A proposed amendment to SVMC 19.90 Essential Public Facilities Senior Planner Lori Barlow stated that this proposed amendment is to prohibit locally significant Essential Public Facilities(EPF) in residential zones and allow EPF's in the Mixed-Use zone. The process included a study session on June 11, 2020 and a public hearing on July 9,2020. The Planning Commission voted to recommend approval of the proposed change. This item is being heard to formalize those findings and the Planning Commission vote, 2 07-23-2020 Planning Commission Minutes Page 3 of 4 Commissioner Kaschmitter moved to approve and forward the City Council the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission for proposed amendment to Spokane Valley Municipal Code(SVMC) CTA-2020-0002. There was no discussion. The vote on the motion was six in favor, zero against and the motion passed. d. Study Session: CTA-2020-0003,Nonconforming Use Code Text Amendment Senior Planner Lori Barlow gave a staff presentation. She explained that Chapter 19,25 of the SVMC regulates nonconforming uses and structures and defines what is considered a legal nonconforming use or structure. According to the code, nonconforming uses are uses or structures that were legally permitted under the applicable regulations at the time the use or structure came into existence and began lawful operations. At some point after the original setup, a change to the zoning code has occurred that has made the use or structure nonconforming. Under this section of the code, these nonconforming uses are allowed to continue and are subject to regulations of this chapter. The chapter also outlines the circumstances that a nonconforming use can be expanded. There are two reasons that the City has been prompted to look at this item. The first reason is regarding single family residential uses in a non-residential zoning district. In the applicability section of the code(19.25.010.04) states that existing legally established single- family residential uses located in a nonresidential zoning district are defined as a legal nonconforming use or structure. According to 19.25.020.02, if a structure is damaged by fire,flood, neglect, or act of nature more than eighty percent of the market value, it may not be rebuilt. This notation in the code is causing problems for residents to get financing to either refinance a current mortgage or get a new mortgage. Banks want to make sure that they can retain their value in the event of a disaster, Staff is proposing to make a change to item four of the applicability regulation that states"existing legally established single-family residential uses located in a nonresidential zoning district shall not be deemed nonconforming and shall be permitted as a legal use." Commissioner Beaulac joined the meeting at 6:25 pin. Ms.Barlow continued that the second reason that has prompted the code text amendment is regarding the ability for property owners to expand nonconforming uses. The current regulations state that nonconforming uses can be expanded within the boundaries of the original lot and any lot adjacent to the original lot if they meet all criteria laid out in the code. Staff is proposing to remove the language from the code allowing expansion onto adjacent lots. Nonconforming uses will continue to be allowed to expand only within the confines of the boundaries of the original lot. Commissioner Hanelce asked if a nonconforming use is only allowed to expand one time onto an adjacent lot. Ms. Barlow answered that staff interpretation would be that owners are limited to expand only one time onto an adjacent lot. However,this isn't a situation that has come up for review yet. However,the proposed amendment would limit expansions to only occur on the confines of the original lot and would prohibit expansion onto any adjacent locations. Commissioner Haneke and Commissioner McKinley expressed concern over the change because it would really limit businesses from growing. It's substantially less expensive to expand than relocate. 3 07-23-2020 Planning Commission Minutes Page 4 ol'4 Commissioner Haneke asked how many nonconforming residential units there are within the City limits. Ms. Barlow that she will try to get that data from the GIS analyst for the next meeting. Deputy City Attorney Lamb mentioned that this will also apply to all mining operations. Currently in the code,all mining within the City limits is considered a nonconforming use because mining really isn't appropriate within an urban setting. However, under the current regulations mining can be expanded onto adjacent properties if the owners purchase the land. This change will eliminate that ability. X. GOOD OF THE ORDER: Commissioner Beaulac apologized for being late to the meeting. Commissioner Haneke and Commissioner Kaschmitter thanked staff for all of their hard work. XL ADJOURNMENT: Commissioner McKinley made a motion to adjourn the meeting at 6:54 pm. The vote on the motion was seven in favor, zero against, and the motion passed. James Johnson, Chair Date signed Deanna Morton, Secretary 4 COMMUNITY AND PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING&PLANNING Sa."I\Mak% pokane Val STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO THE 4000 Valley` PLANNING COMMISSION CTA-2020-0002 STAFF REPORT DATE: July 2,2020 HEARING DATE AND LOCATION: July 9,2020,beginning at 6:00 p.m.;Due to the restrictions on public gatherings arising from the covid-19 outbreak,and pursuant to Governor Inslee's Stay Home,Stay Healthy Proclamation (No. 20-25) and Proclamation 20-28 (and associated extensions), this hearing will be conducted remotely using web and telephone conference tools. A link to the Zoom meeting will be provided on the agenda and posted to the City's webpage: www.spokanevalley.orglplanningcommission. Proposal Description: A city-initiated code text amendment to chapter 19.90 of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) and SVMC 19.60.050 to prohibit locally significant Essential Public Facilities (EPFs)in the single-family residential zones,to allow EPFs in the Mixed Use Zone, and to address other housekeeping items. APPROVAL CRITERIA: Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan,SVMC 17.80.150, 19.30.040. SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS: Staff concludes that the proposed amendments to chapter 19.90 SVMC and SVMC 19.60.050 are consistent with minimum criteria for review and approval, and consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. STAFF CONTACT: Lori Barlow, AICP, Senior Planner. REVIEWED BY: Jenny Nickerson, Building Official. ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit 1: Proposed Amendment APPLICATION PROCESSING: Chapter 17.80 SVMC,Permit Processing Procedures. The following table summarizes the procedural steps for the proposal. Process Date Department of Commerce 60-day Notice of Intent to June 15,2020 Adopt Amendment SEPA—DNS Issued June 19,2020 Published Notice of Public Hearing: June 19 and 26,2020 Background: EPFs are facilities that are typically difficult to site due to the use or resulting impacts. EPFs are defined in various state laws including RCW 47.06.140, 81.112.020 and 71.09.020. The Growth Management Act (GMA) requires cities to establish a process for identifying and siting EPFs. The State has identified a list of EPFs pursuant to WAC 364-196-550, which includes state and local correctional facilities,solid waste handling facilities, and in-patient facilities, which includes substance abuse facilities, mental health, group homes, and secure Staff Report and Recommendation CTA-2020-0002 community transition facilities. The City may not preclude the siting of EPFs within their jurisdiction. The City is signatory to the Interlocal Agreement regarding Siting of Essential Public Facilities within Spokane County with Spokane County,the City of Spokane, and other municipalities. The Interlocal Agreement defines the siting process applicable to EPFs. Generally speaking, a proponent submits a request for determination of appropriate siting process to the Spokane County Planning Department for a decision by the Board of County Commissioners(BOCC). If the use is determined to be an EPF of regional or statewide significance, the project will be sited using the regional siting process. This process utilizes a location analysis with significant public involvement that ultimately results in a ranking of the sites from the BOCC. If the EPF is determined to be locally significant, the EPF is sited through the local EPF siting process established by each jurisdiction. The city regulates EPFs pursuant to chapter 19.90 SVMC. The current regulations categorize the uses as statewide, regionally, or locally significant and identify the process as noted above. Additionally the regulations require all EPFs to receive a conditional use permit(CUP)pursuant to chapter 19.150 SVMC to address the unanticipated impacts of the use. Lastly, the permitted use matrix in SVMC 19.60.050 identifies the zones where EPFs are allowed. Currently EPFs are allowed in all zones except Mixed Use(MU)and Parks and Open Space(POS). Although the City cannot prohibit the siting of EPFs within the City limits,the City may prohibit the siting of EPFs in residential zones so long as there is adequate, appropriate land available in other zones. At this time the City is proposing a code text amendment to prohibit EPFs in the single-family residential zones and also proposed a reorganization of chapter 19.90 SVMC improve the clarity. ANALYSIS: Currently EPFs are allowed in all zones except MU and POS pursuant to SVMC 19.60.050,Table 1, Permitted Use Matrix(Table 1 below) and subject to a Conditional Use Permit pursuant to chapter 19.150 SVMC. Table 1 19.60.050 Permitted Uses Matrix Zones RI R2 R3 MFR MU CMU NC RC IMU I PO5 Public/Quasi-Public Community facilities PPP P P P PP PP P Essential public facilities R R R R R R R RR Public utility local distribution facility S SS S S S S P PP S Public utility transmission facility SSS S S S S S SS S Tower, wind turbine support S S SS The proposed amendment: 1. Prohibits locally significant EPFs from locating in single family residential zones because they are incompatible with residential uses. Page 2 of 5 Staff Report and Recommendation CTA-2020-0002 As noted above,EPFs are defined and categorized as such due to the necessity for such facilities and uses and the implicit challenges due to the impacts on surrounding properties. However, EPFs that primarily serve local populations may be categorized as locally significant. Locally significant EPFs are subject to City regulatory approval,which requires a CUP process. They are also currently allowed in all residential zones. The City has recently processed CUP's for several small scale substance abuse detoxification facilities determined to be locally significant through the siting process,one of which was proposed in a residential zone. The Hearing Examiner (HEX)determined through the CUP process that the facility was not compatible with the residential uses,due to the commercial nature of the service,traffic impacts,physical changes proposed to the site,and various operational impacts that included shift changes and even deliveries. The HEX denied the CUP, The decision for that project highlights the contradictory nature of allowing EPFs in single-family residential zones. While all EPFs have some level of challenge in fmding an appropriate site,the impacts are generally magnified in single-family residential zones due to the limited residential uses in such zones. The proposed amendment will prevent incompatible uses from locating within single family residential zones. 2. The proposed amendment is consistent with state laws. Pursuant to RCW 36.70A.200(1)Cities are required to establish a process for identifying and siting EPFs. Generally there is a distinction between EPFs of statewide and regional significance and locally significant EPFs. A City has more authority to zone locally significant EPFs and may preclude them from single family residential zones so long as they are allowed in at least one residential zone and other zones within the City. The proposed amendment precludes locally significant EPFs from the single family residential zones(R-1, R-2 and R-3) but allows the use in all other zones(MFR,MU,CMU, RC,NC, IMU, I) except POS. 3. Allows EPFs in multifamily residential zones and mixed use zones. The amendment recognizes that certain EPFs are designed to be located in residential zones,such as group homes or residential substance abuse treatment facilities, and continues to allow EPFs in the multi-family residential zone and mixed use zones where a wide range of residential uses are allowed. Table 2 Proposed Amendment to 19.60.050 Permitted Uses Matrix Zones R1 R2 R3 MFR MU CMU NC RC IMU I POS Public/Quasi-Public Community facilities PPP P P P P P PP P !Essential public facilities EEE E E E E E E , E Public utility local distribution facility SSS S S S S P PP S Public utility transmission facility S SS S S S S S SS S Tower, wind turbine support S S SS Page 3 of 5 Staff Report and Recommendation CTA-2020-0002 A. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO THE MUNICIPAL CODE TEXT AMENDMENT L Compliance with Title 17(General Provisions)of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code a. Findings: SVMC 17.80.150(F)Municipal Code Text Amendment Approval Criteria The City may approve a Municipal Code Text amendment if it finds that: i. The proposed text amendment is consistent with the applicable provisions of the Comprehensive Plan: Staff Analysis: The proposed amendment is supported by the Comprehensive Plan and is consistent with the following Comprehensive goals and policies: LU-G1 Maintain and enhance the character and quality of life in Spokane Valley. LU-G2 Provide for land uses that are essential to Spokane Valley residents,employees, and visitors CF-P19 Collaborate with Spokane County jurisdictions in determining the best locations for public and private essential public facilities. LU-P5 Ensure compatibility between adjacent residential and commercial or industrial uses LU-P7 Protect residential neighborhoods from incompatible land uses and adverse impacts associated with transportation corridors. H-P4 Enable the creation of housing for resident individuals and families needing assistance from social and human service providers. CF-G1 Coordinate with special districts, other jurisdictions, and the private sector to effectively and affordably provide facilities and services. ii. The proposed amendment bears a substantial relation to public health,safety, welfare,and protection of the environment: Staff Analysis: The proposed amendment bears substantial relation to public health, safety,welfare and protection of the environment. Precluding locally significant EPFs in the single family residential zones protects the character of the existing single family residential uses and allows those EPFs that have a residential component to located in other mixed use or high density residential zones. The proposed amendment protects residential neighborhoods from incompatible land uses and provides for EPFs that require a residential character. The amendment addresses community concerns and protects community character. The amendment will also direct locally significant EPFs into zones and sites more suitable and allow for more efficient processing and permitting of the necessary services they provide. b. Conclusion(s): The proposed text amendment is consistent with the approval criteria contained in the SVMC 17.80.150(F). 2. Finding and Conclusions Specific to Public Comments a. Findings: Page 4 of 5 Staff Report and Recommendation CTA-2020-0002 No public comments have been received to date. b. Conclusion(s): Adequate public noticing was conducted for CTA-2020-0002 pursuant to adopted public noticing procedures. 3. Finding and Conclusions Specific to Agency Comments a. Findings: The City has not received any agency comments to date. b. Conclusion(s): No concerns noted. B. CONCLUSION For the reasons set forth in Section A the proposed code text amendment to preclude locally significant EPFs from the R-1, R-2, and R 3 zones, allow EPFs in the MU zone, and other housekeeping items is consistent with the requirements of SVMC 17.80.150(F) and the Comprehensive Plan. Page 5 of 5 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: September 8,2020 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ®new business ❑public hearing ❑ information❑admin.report ❑pending legislation ❑executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: First reading — proposed Ordinance 20-011 amending chapter 9.20 SVMC, motorized personal transportation devices. GOVERNING LEGISLATION: Title 46 Motor Vehicles, Revised Code of Washington (RCW); RCW 46.04.336; RCW 46.20.500; RCW 46.61.710;RCW 46.61.715; Chapter 9.20 SVMC PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: November 16, 2004: Passed Ordinance 04-048 addressing scooters; amended by Ordinance 07-005 passed by Council March 27, 2007, codified as chapter 9.20 SVMC. April 23, 2019: Information Only Item regarding LIME Bike and Scooter-share program. June 30,2020: Administrative Report regarding proposed Ordinance 20-011 amending chapter 9.20 SVMC. BACKGROUND: Generally Use of electric-assisted bike and motorized foot scooter share programs, such as LIME, have increased significantly in Washington state in recent years. Companies like LIME provide electric-assisted bikes and motorized foot scooters to customers through smart phone apps. Additionally, Washingtonians have purchased electric-assisted bicycles throughout the years, contributing to the presence of these devices throughout the state. In response to the increased use of electric-assisted bikes and motorized foot scooters share programs, the Washington State Legislature enacted legislation over the past two years regulating such use. The legislation, amending RCW Title 46,generally provides the following: 1. Broadens the definition of motorized foot scooter and provides a definition of each class of electric-assisted bicycle. 2. Amends existing state regulations regarding motorized transportation devices by making clear that they apply to motorized foot scooters as well. Such regulations include setting the minimum operating age at 16, setting standard speed limits of 15 mph, prohibiting sidewalk use for motorized scooters and Class 3 electric-assisted bicycles, and identifying applicable motorized foot scooter parking regulations. These regulations may be modified by local law, but if not modified, are the default applicable law for use of motorized foot scooters. 3. Regulates where each class of electric-assisted bicycles may be used, such as sidewalks, right-of-ways, and bike lanes, and authorizes local jurisdictions to further regulate the use of electric-assisted bicycles. 4. Authorizes local jurisdictions to contract for "shared" scooter and bicycle programs and to establish applicable limits on such programs. Staff brought forward an administrative report on June 30,2020,with a draft Ordinance amending chapter 9.20 SVMC, aligning the code with the new changes to state law. In addition to minor technical corrections,the proposed Ordinance: 1. Amends the definitions to be consistent with state definitions. 2. Prohibits parking of motorized personal transportation devices on sidewalks where such parking obstructs normal pedestrian use, and makes any bike/scooter share company responsible for the illegal parking of their devices. 3. Allows use of motorized personal transportation devices in bike lanes on streets with speed limits greater than 25 mph. 4. Retains the prohibition of using motorized personal transportation devices on sidewalks and public trails. Changes to Ordinance based on comments at Administrative Report City Council expressed concerns to proposed changes regarding certain locations where a motorized transportation device may be used. First, Council was concerned with prohibiting motorized foot scooters and electric-assisted bicycles on streets with a speed limit greater than 25 mph that have no a bike lane. Second, Council was concerned with prohibiting sidewalk use of motorized foot scooters and electric- assisted bicycles in areas where street use is also prohibited. Finally, Council also had concerns about prohibiting motorized foot scooters and electric-assisted bicycles on public trails such as Appleway Trail and the Centennial Trail. Ultimately, Council felt that the proposed changes could limit the utility of electric-assisted bicycle and scooter use throughout the City. Since the Administrative Report, staff has received comments from multiple members of the public reflecting concerns about limiting electric assisted bicycles by class on the Appleway Trail and Centennial Trail. Citizens indicated that often they need some motorized assistance for longer rides, that in many instances the class distinctions are not clear during purchase (especially if e-bikes are purchased online), and that they do not see any practical difference between the various classes of e-bikes and other non-motorized bicycles. Staff discussed Council's concerns and citizen comments with the City's Senior Traffic Engineer to identify possible solutions. To address the utility concerns of Council and the citizens, and to provide a simplified solution, staff proposes the following changes to draft Ordinance 20-011 as presented on June 30,2020: 1. Include all classes of electric-assisted bicycles under the definition of motorized personal transportation devices. Previously, only classes 2 and 3 were listed under the definition. Including all three classes under the definition allows the City to regulate the classes equally, making enforcement and regulation easier. 2. Prohibits sidewalk use, but allows motorized personal transportation devices equipped with an electric motor (i.e. motorized scooters and electric-assisted bicycles) to use the sidewalk when a street has no bike lane or other shared use path. However, permitted motorized personal transportation devices must yield to pedestrians and not exceed a speed of 10 mph. 3. Generally prohibits trail use, but does allow motorized personal transportation devices equipped with an electric motor (i.e. motorized scooters and electric-assisted bicycles) on trails provided the user or rider does not exceed 15 mph. These changes are highlighted in yellow in the proposed Ordinance. Staff believes these changes will address the City Council's and the citizens' concerns regarding effective use throughout the City, and ensure the safety of individuals using sidewalks and trails. The final issue discussed during the Administrative Report was the penalty amount. City Council indicated a desire to align with State penalties. Though there are a variety of possible penalties, at the State level the schedule ranges from $33 to $73. Staff recommend a penalty of$50 as a middle level. Law enforcement reported no infractions of chapter 9.20 SVMC over the last three years. OPTIONS: (1)Move to advance the ordinance to a second reading with or without further amendments; or(2)take other action as appropriate. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to advance Ordinance 20-011, amending chapter 9.20 SVMC,to a second reading. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: There are no projected budget or financial impacts. STAFF CONTACT: Erik Lamb,Deputy City Attorney; Carly Johnson,Legal Intern. ATTACHMENTS: Draft Ordinance amending chapter 9.20 SVMC. DRAFT CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY SPOKANE COUNTY,WASHINGTON ORDINANCE 20-011 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON,ADOPTING AMENDMENTS TO CHAPTER 9.20 OF THE SPOKANE VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE TO UPDATE DEFINITIONS AND REGULATIONS RELATING TO MOTORIZED PERSONAL TRANSPORTATION DEVICES, AND OTHER MATTERS RELATING THERETO. WHEREAS, the City of Spokane Valley previously adopted chapter 9.20 of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code relating to the use of motorized personal transportation devices;and WHEREAS, the use of motorized personal transportation devises has become more popular due to motorized scooter and electric-assisted bicycle share programs; and WHEREAS, the Washington State Legislature amended Title 46 of the Revised Code of Washington responding to the increased use of motorized personal transportation devices and motorized scooter share programs; and WHEREAS,the changes in state law affect the current chapter 9.20 SVMC; and WHEREAS,the City desires to make chapter 9.20 SVMC consistent with state law and responsive to the increased use of motorized scooter and electric-assisted bicycle share programs; and WHEREAS,the proposed changes are in the best interest of the health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of the City. NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley, Spokane County, Washington,do ordain as follows: Section 1. Amendment. Chapter 9.20 of the SVMC is hereby amended as follows: 9.20.010 Purpose The purpose and intent of this chapter is to implement local regulations governing the use of motorized personal transportation devices on city streets, sidewalks, trails, bike paths, and other public property. 9.20.0210 Definitions. The following definitions are applicable in this chapter unless the context otherwise requires: AE. "Approved bicycle helmet" means a head covering designed for safety that meets or exceeds the required safety standards adopted by the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) 15 USCS 6004, or Z-00.4 set by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI), the Snell Foundation, the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), or such subsequent nationally recognized standard for helmet performance as may be adopted by the City of Spokane Valley. The helmet shall be equipped with a neck or chin strap that shall be securely fastened while the motorized personal transportation device is in motion. BD. "Approved motorcycle helmet" means a protective covering for the head consisting of a hard outer shell,padding adjacent to and inside the outer shell, and a neck or chin strap type retention system,with a Ordinance 20-011 Amending SVMC 9.20 Page 1 of 5 DRAFT label required by the Federal Consumer Product Safety Commission as adopted by the Code of Federal Regulations, 16 CFR Section 1203. C. "Electric-assisted bicycles," "class 1 electric-assisted bicycle," "class 2 electric-assisted bicycle," and "class 3 electric-assisted bicycle" shall have the meanings as set forth in RCW 46.04.169 as now adopted or hereafter amended. CCD. "Modified or enhanced" means that any of the settings or equipment of the motorized personal transportation device, including but not limited to those settings or equipment that affects displacement, horsepower, or muffler effect have been altered to achieve greater power, higher speed, and/or better performance than possible when the unit was delivered from the factory for sale. EA. "Motorized foot scooter" is defined as set forth in RCW 46.04.336, as now adopted or hereafter amended. designed to be stood upon (but may have a scat), and is powered by an internal combustion engine or electric motor that is capable of propelling the device with or without human propulsion. FG. "Motorized personal transportation device" shall be a motorized device for personal transportation deemed to include motorized foot scooters, motorized skateboards, pocket motorcycles, class 1, class 2, and class 3 electric-assisted bicycles,and all other similar devices,but shall exclude motorized wheelchairs, motor driven cycles, mopeds, class 1 electric assisted bicycles, motorcycles, and electronic personal assistive mobility devices. GB. "Motorized skateboard" means every device with a platform on which the rider or operator balances, the platform having two or more sets of wheels beneath it,propelled by an attached or auxiliary electric or gasoline motor. H. "Scooter share program," and "bike share program" mean a person offering shared motorized foot scooters or electric-assisted bicycles for hire. I. "Sidewalk"for purposes of this chapter only is defined as set forth in RCW 46.04.540 as now adopted or hereafter amended. W."Street,"for the purposes of this chapter only,means the entire width between the curb boundary lines, including any designated bike lanes and the shoulder, of every way publicly maintained in the City of Spokane Valley when any part thereof is open to the use of the public for purposes of vehicular travel or parking. 9.20.0230 Duty to obey rules of the road. Any person operating a motorized personal transportation device on a street shall obey all rules of the road applicable to motor vehicles, as well as the commands of official traffic control signals, signs, and other control devices applicable to motor vehicles, unless otherwise directed by a law enforcement official or their designee. Every person operating a motorized personal transportation device on a street is granted all of the rights and is subject to all of the duties and responsibilities applicable to the driver of a motor vehicle pursuant to Chapter 308-330 WAC, except WAC 308-330-500 through 308-330-540 relating to bicycle licensing, as adopted or hereafter amended, a copy of which will be kept on file in the city clerk's office, and pursuant to Chapter 9.05 SVMC except as to those provisions thereof which by their very nature can have no application. 9.20.0340 Requirements for operating motorized personal transportation devices. A.Minimum Age.No person shall operate a motorized personal transportation device on a street, alley,or other public area unless such person is 16 years of age or older. Ordinance 20-011 Amending SVMC 9.20 Page 2 of 5 DRAFT B. Passengers—Towing. Only one person shall occupy a motorized personal transportation device at one time.An operator of a motorized personal transportation device shall not transport passengers or tow other devices or persons behind a motorized personal transportation device. C. Helmet Required. Any person operating a motorized personal transportation device propelled by an internal combustion engine upon any street, alley or other public place in the City shall wear an approved motorcycle helmet designed for safety on his or her head and shall have the neck or chin strap of the helmet fastened securely while the motorized personal transportation device is in motion or operation. D. Lighting Required. 1.All motorized personal transportation devices,when in use on any street,alley,or other public area, shall be equipped with a functioning lamp on the front that shall emit a white light visible from a distance of at least 500 feet to the front. 2.All motorized personal transportation devices,when in use on any street, alley or other public area, shall be equipped with a functioning red reflector on the rear of the motorized personal transportation device, of a type approved by the Washington State Patrol,that is visible from all distances up to 600 feet to the rear when directly in front of lawful lower beams of the head lamps on a motor vehicle. A lamp that emits a red light visible from a distance of 500 feet to the rear may be used in addition to the red reflector.A light-emitting diode (LED)flashing tail light that is visible from a distance of 500 feet to the rear may likewise be used in addition to the red reflector. 3. All motorized personal transportation devices in operation on a street shall be equipped with a stop lamp or lamps on the rear of the motorized personal transportation device which shall display a red or amber light,or any shade of color between red and amber,visible from a distance of not less than 300 feet to the rear in normal sunlight, and which shall be actuated upon application of a service brake. E.Muffler Required.Motorized personal transportation devices powered by an internal combustion engine shall have a properly functioning engine muffler attached and constantly operational during use of the motorized personal transportation device to prevent a noise nuisance as prohibited by SVMC 7.05.040(0). The use of a cutout, bypass, or similar muffler elimination device is prohibited on all motorized personal transportation devices that are powered by an internal combustion engine. F. Brake Required. Motorized personal transportation devices shall be equipped with a rear brake which, when applied,enables the operator to make the braked wheel(s)skid on dry,level,clean pavement. G. Modifications Prohibited. Motorized personal transportation devices operated within the City of Spokane Valley shall not be modified or enhanced in design or construction from the specifications as provided by the manufacturer or as otherwise required by Spokane Valley Municipal Code provisions or the Revised Code of Washington. 9.20.0450 Prohibited areas. A. Parks. All prohibitions and regulations applicable to motorized vehicles in City parks as set forth in chapter 6.05 SVMC shall apply to Mmotorized personal transportation devices, and without limitation, motorized personal transportation devices are prohibited from all City parks, except (1) in public streets, parking areas, parking lots or such designated areas where motorized vehicular use is allowed, and (2) as otherwise provided in SVMC 9.20.050(C). Use within such areas shall be subject to all applicable state and local laws, including, but not limited to, Title 46 RCW and chapter 6.05 SVMC. pursuant to SVMC 6.05.070(G). Violations of this restriction are subject to the specific penalties set forth in SVMC 6.05.090 and 6.05.100. Ordinance 20-011 Amending SVMC 9.20 Page 3 of 5 DRAFT B. Sidewalks._It is unlawful for any person to operate or ride a motorized personal transportation device on any sidewalk within the City of Spokane Valley Gcity limits, except motorized personal transportation devices equipped with an electric motor when :a street has no bike lane, provided that pedestrians shall have maintain the right of way, and provided further that the device does not exceed a speed greater than 10 miles per hour while on the sidewalk. C. Public Trails. Unless otherwise specified in this subsection,lit is unlawful for any person to operate or ride a motorized personal transportation device on any public trails_, including the Centennial Trail. A person may operate or ride a personal transportation device equipped with an electric motor at a speed no greater than 15 miles per hour on the Appleway Trail and the Centennial Trail. In the event of any conflict between this subsection 9.20.050(C)and any provision of chapter 6.05 SVMC,this subsection shall control. within he City of Spokane valley Cit.,limit D.Certain Streets.It is unlawful for any person to operate or ride a motorized personal transportation device on any street with a speed limit greater than 25 miles per hour,except within designated bike lanes on such streets. E. Parking - Generally. Parking of motorized personal transportation devices is prohibited on all public sidewalks when such parking interferes, impairs, obstructs, blocks, or impedes the free and full use of the sidewalk. Any motorized personal transportation device parked illegally shall be subject to removal by the City or its contractor. F. Parking - Scooter or bike share. Any scooter or bike share company responsible for or owning a motorized personal transportation device parked illegally pursuant to this section shall be deemed to have committed a traffic infraction subject to the penalties set forth in this chapter. 9.20.0560 Applicability of other traffic laws. The following criminal traffic laws shall apply to the operation of motorized personal transportation devices within the City of Spokane Valley: A.Negligent Driving-First Degree-RCW 46.61.5249,as adopted by reference in WAC 308-330-425,as adopted or hereafter amended, and kept on file in the city clerk's office, and pursuant to Chapter 9.05 SVMC. B.Negligent Driving-Second Degree -RCW 46.61.525, as adopted by reference in WAC 308-330-425, as adopted or hereafter amended, and kept on file in the city clerk's office, and pursuant to Chapter 9.05 SVMC. C. Reckless Driving - RCW 46.61.500, as adopted by reference in WAC 308-330-425, as adopted or hereafter amended, and kept on file in the city clerk's office,and pursuant to Chapter 9.05 SVMC. D. Driving Under the Influence - RCW 46.61.502, as adopted by reference in WAC 308-330-425, as adopted or hereafter amended, and kept on file in the city clerk's office, and pursuant to Chapter 9.05 SVMC. E.Driver Under 21 Consuming Alcohol-RCW 46.61.503,as adopted by reference in WAC 308-330-425, as adopted or hereafter amended, and kept on file in the city clerk's office, and pursuant to Chapter 9.05 SVMC. 9.20.0470 Dealer notice required. All persons and/or establishments in the City of Spokane Valley involved in the retail sale,er-lease,rental, or"sharing," of motorized personal transportation devices shall provide to each purchaser, renter, or user of said motorized personal transportation device written notice of the regulations, restrictions, and Ordinance 20-011 Amending SVMC 9.20 Page 4 of 5 DRAFT requirements of this chapter prior to completing the sale,er—lease, rental, or "sharing" of said motorized personal transportation device. 9.20.0780 Violation—Penalty. Except as otherwise provided herein,Aany person violating any provision of this chapter,except for SVMC 9.20.010(B), shall be deemed to have committed a (Class 2 or Class 2 pl s uft costs and f es` traffic infraction and shall be subject to a penalty of$50.00. However, conduct that constitutes a violation of a rule of the road, or constitutes a criminal traffic offense,may also be charged as such and is subject to the maximum penalties allowed for such an offense or offenses. A violation of this chapter for a minor under the age of 16 shall result in a referral to the Spokane County juvenile justice system for resolution. Section 2. Other sections unchanged. All other provisions of Title 9 SVMC not specifically referenced hereto shall remain in full force and effect. Section 3. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance shall be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section,sentence,clause,or phrase of this Ordinance. Section 4. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect five days after publication of this Ordinance or summary therefor in the official newspaper of the City of Spokane Valley as provided by law. Passed by the City Council this day of ,2020 Ben Wick,Mayor ATTEST: Christine Bainbridge,City Clerk Approved as to Form: Office of the City Attorney Date of Publication: Effective Date: Ordinance 20-011 Amending SVMC 9.20 Page 5 of 5 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: September 8, 2020 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ® admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Estimated 2021 revenues and expenditures. GOVERNING LEGISLATION: State budget law. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: No formal Council action has been taken on the 2021 Budget. A proposed budget is currently under review by the City Manager who will present his Preliminary 2021 Budget to the Council on October 13, 2020. BACKGROUND: This marks the second occasion where the Council will discuss the 2021 Budget. The first occurred during the August 4, 2020, Council Workshop where the Council reviewed 2021 Budget worksheets prepared by staff. By the time the Council is scheduled to adopt the 2021 Budget on November 24, 2020, Council will have had an opportunity to discuss it on eight separate occasions, including three public hearings to gather input from citizens: • August 4 Council Budget Workshop • September 8 Admin report: Estimated 2021 revenues and expenditures • September 22 Public hearing #1 on 2021 revenues and expenditures • October 13 City Manager's presentation of preliminary 2021 Budget • October 27 Public hearing #2 on 2021 Budget • November 10 First reading on ordinance adopting the 2021 Budget • November 24 Public hearing #3 on 2021 Budget • November 24 Second reading on ordinance adopting the 2021 Budget State law requires that the City hold a public hearing on revenue sources for the upcoming year's budget in order to consider input from the public. This hearing is scheduled to take place on September 22nd. The presentation this evening is an administrative report leading up to the public hearing. Until City Council's adoption, all figures currently included in the 2021 Budget worksheets are preliminary and subject to change. 2021 Budget Overview: • The 2021 Budget currently includes appropriations of $93,128,465 including $28,932,170 in capital expenditures, comprised in-part of: o $6,807,168 in Fund #303 Street Capital Projects. o $561,805 in Fund #309 Park Capital Projects. o $4,676,350 in Fund #311 Pavement Preservation including $991,843 financed by the General Fund. o $13,543,320 in Fund #314 Railroad Grade Separation Projects. o $2,163,227 in Stormwater Management Fund #402 and Aquifer Protection Area Fund #403 projects. 1 • To partially offset the $28,932,170 in capital costs we anticipate $18,626,060 in grant revenues which results in 64.38% of capital expenditures being covered with State and Federal money. • Budgets will be adopted across 24 separate funds. The City Hall Construction Fund #313 will be closed and a new Affordable & Supportive Housing Sales Tax Fund #108 will be created with a future 2020 Budget Amendment. • The full time equivalent employee (FTE) count will remain 95.25 in 2021. There is one vacant position in Economic Development being repurposed to Engineering due to workload and one vacant Engineer position that was budgeted 50/50 between Engineering and Street Capital Projects being repurposed to a Housing & Homeless Services Coordinator in the City Manager department. Pertaining Specifically to the General Fund: • The 2021 recurring revenue estimate of $45,251,419 is $803,119 or 1.81% greater than the 2020 proposed amended budget of $44,448,300. The 2021 amount is $3,030,381 or 6.28% less than the adopted 2020 budget estimate. • The 2021 recurring expenditure proposal of$45,101,466 is $2,188,341 or 5.10% greater than the 2020 proposed amended appropriation of$42,913,125. The 2021 amount is $1,879,480 or 4.35% greater than the adopted 2020 budget amount. • Budgeted recurring revenues currently exceed recurring expenditures by $149,953 or 0.33% of recurring revenues. • Nonrecurring expenditures total $2,151,300 and include: o $212,800 for Information Technology expenditures including: ■ $10,000 to replace outdated copiers ■ $159,000 for server upgrades and to replace the card access systems at CenterPlace and the Maintenance Shop ■ $43,800 for software upgrades and Laserfiche workflow o $78,900 for various Public Safety items including: ■ $37,500 for the replacement of handguns (split 50% with the County) ■ $11,400 for a radar trailer ■ $20,000 to replace the access control gate at the Precinct ■ $10,000 to replace the fire panel at the Precinct o $1,859,600 transfer out to the Street O&M Fund #101 to cover the deficit in recurring expenditures exceeding recurring revenues in that fund • The total of 2021 recurring and nonrecurring expenditures exceeds total revenues by $2,151,300. • The projected ending fund balance for the General Fund at the end of 2021 is currently $32,936,464 or 73.03% of recurring expenditures. Housing & Homeless Services Coordinator Position: • The prospect of creating a new Housing & Homeless Services division was discussed at the Budget Workshop on August 4, 2020. During that discussion, it was determined that Council did not wish to establish a new division at this time; however, Council asked staff to research 2 the possibility of repurposing a current vacant position for this use in order to meet immediate City needs in this area. • Staff determined that a vacant Engineer position could be repurposed for this use. The Engineer position has been budgeted 50/50 in the Engineering division and Street Capital Projects. This position will be converted to a Housing & Homeless Services Coordinator in the City Manager Department beginning in the fourth-quarter of 2020 and a full year in the current 2021 proposed budget. This will result in an increase to the City Manager's budget with a corresponding reduction in the Engineering budget from what was seen on August 4th Other Funds: 2021 Budget appropriations (expenditures) in the other funds total $45,875,699 as follows: Fund Fund 2021 Number Name Appropriation 101 Street Fund 5,567,200 103 Paths and Trails Fund 0 104 Hotel / Motel Tax -Tourism Facilities Fund 0 105 Hotel / Motel Tax Fund 710,000 106 Solid Waste Fund 1,737,000 107 PEG Fund 73,000 108 Affordable & Supportive Housing Sales Tax Fund 0 120 CenterPlace Operating Reserve Fund 0 121 Service Level Stabilization Reserve Fund 0 122 Winter Weather Reserve Fund 500,000 204 Debt Service Fund 1,043,850 301 REET 1 Capital Projects Fund 2,090,206 302 REET 2 Capital Projects Fund 2,288,408 303 Street Capital Projects Fund 6,807,168 309 Parks Capital Projects Fund 561,805 310 Civic Facilities Capital Projects Fund 0 311 Pavement Preservation Fund 4,726,350 312 Capital Reserve Fund 1,370,158 313 City Hall Construction Fund 0 314 Railroad Grade Separation Projects Fund 13,546,320 402 Stormwater Management Fund 2,626,007 403 Aquifer Protection Area Fund 1,663,227 501 Equipment Rental and Replacement Fund 140,000 502 Risk Management Fund 425,000 45,875,699 Primary sources of revenues in these other funds include: • Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax revenue that is collected by the State and remitted to the Street Fund is anticipated to be $2,062,000. • Telephone Tax revenues remitted to the City that supports Street Fund operations and maintenance are anticipated to be $1,431,000. • Real Estate Excise Tax (REET) revenues that are in large part used to match grant financed street projects are anticipated to total $2,000,000. 3 • Hotel / Motel Tax revenues that are dedicated to the promotion of visitors and tourism are anticipated to be $559,000 ($346,000 in the Hotel/Motel Tax Fund #105 and $213,000 in the Hotel/Motel Tax—Tourism Facilities Fund #104). • Stormwater Management Fees that are estimated at $1,900,000. • Aquifer Protection Area Fees are estimated at $460,000. Funding Challenges: • The COVID-19 Pandemic continues to impact revenues and as a consequence, as we receive updated information on tax collections and revenue sources we anticipate there may be changes to revenue projections as we progress through this 2021 Budget development process. You'll note there has been a relatively material change to estimates since the August 4t" Budget Workshop in one revenue source. o We've received two additional months of sales tax receipts since information was prepared for the Workshop. Overall, receipts are currently tracking with what was received at this time during 2019. However, sources at the state and national level as well as observations of the current economy make it unclear as to whether the current level of collections is sustainable or will decrease in future months. In response to new information, staff has increased sales tax estimates to reflect a 10% decrease from 2019 collections rather than the 20% that was used in the estimates at the Budget Workshop. We will continue to monitor collections and adjust accordingly. o Other revenues are tracking with estimates that were given at the Budget Workshop and have not been adjusted since that time. • Declining revenues in the Street O&M Fund #101 are impacting our ability to deliver historic levels of service. Fund#101 is dependent upon motor vehicle fuel tax revenues and telephone utility tax revenues. o Motor vehicle fuel taxes have increased slightly due to recent State legislation; however, they are generally flat or declining in recent years due to improvements in vehicle fuel mileage. o Telephone utility taxes have been declining at an average of 5.90% per year from 2009 through 2019. We believe the decline is primarily due to the elimination of land lines by individual households. The revenues from this tax reached a high of $3.1 million in 2009 (the year the tax was implemented) and is currently estimated to generate $1.4 million in 2021. • Balancing the cost of pavement preservation against other transportation and infrastructure needs. o Pavement Preservation Fund #311 is relying more heavily on REET revenues due to an elimination of the contribution from the Street Fund #101 related to declining revenues and an elimination of contributions from the Civic Facility Replacement Fund #123. The fund balance in Fund #123 was entirely depleted at the end of 2016, and the fund was closed during 2017. o Reliance on REET revenues to fund pavement preservation in Fund #311 limits the City's ability to provide match funding for State and Federal grants received for other street projects. o Railroad grade separation projects (overpasses and underpasses) are exceptionally expensive endeavors and are largely beyond the City's ability to finance through existing sources of revenue. The City has secured funding for the Barker Rd. Grade Separation project; however, funding is still needed for other grade separation projects within the City. 4 OPTIONS: State law requires a public hearing on 2021 estimated revenues and expenditures. A hearing is scheduled for September 22, 2020. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: No action is requested at this time. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Given that the budget will not be adopted by the Council until November 24, 2020, it is possible the figures may be modified as we refine estimates of revenues and expenditures. STAFF CONTACT: Chelsie Taylor, Finance Director ATTACHMENTS: • Power Point presentation. • Assorted 2021 Budget information: o Pages 1-13 Budget summary information with detail by fund. o Page 14-15 General Fund budget change from August 4 to September 8. o Page 16 General Fund revenue and expenditure line-item changes. o Page 17-19 General Fund department changes from 2020 to 2021. o Page 20 Full-time equivalent employees (FTEs). 5 City of Spokane Valley 2021 Budget Discussion Administrative Report on 2021 Revenues and Expenditures September 8, 2020 2021 Budget Summary All Funds Total appropriations across all City Funds of $93. 1 million including : $47.3 million in the General Fund which is comprised of $45. 1 million recurring and $2.2 million nonrecurring $45.8 million spread across 23 additional funds $28.9 million in capital expenditures 2 2020 Budget Summary All Funds FTE count proposed to be 95.25 employees in 2021 , which is the same as 2020. However, two positions transitioned between departments. There is one vacant position in Economic Development being repurposed to Engineering due to workload and one vacant Engineer position that was budgeted 50/50 between Engineering and Street Capital Projects being repurposed to a Housing & Homeless Services Coordinator in the City Manager department. 3 General Fund — Housing & Homeless Services At the Budget Workshop, Council decided against creating a new Housing & Homeless Services division at this time but asked about the ability to repurpose a vacant position. Staff determined that a vacant Engineer position could be repurposed for this use. The Engineer position was budgeted 50/50 in the Engineering division and Street Capital Projects. This will also be included in a future budget amendment for a partial year in 2020. 4 General Fund REVENUES: Total recurring 2021 revenues of $45,251 ,419 as compared to $44,448,300 in 2020 for an increase of $803, 119 or 1 .81 %. ■ All revenue estimates are based upon a combination of historical collections and future projections of economic conditions with some increasing and others decreasing . 2 largest sources are Sales Tax and Property Tax which are collectively estimated to account for $37,686,400 or 83.28% of 2021 General Fund recurring revenues. 5 General Fund General sales tax collections are estimated at $22,220,000, an increase of $436,000 or 2.00% over the 2020 proposed amended budget. In response to new information , staff has increased sales tax estimates to reflect a 10% decrease from 2019 collections rather than the 20% that was used in the estimates at the Budget Workshop. We will continue to monitor collections and adjust accordingly. 6 General Fund Property Tax levy is not proposed to include the 1 increase authorized by State law. 2021 Levy is estimated at $12,549,200 Levy assumes we start with the 2020 levy of $12,399,226 + estimated new construction of $150,000 General Fund EXPENDITURES: 2021 recurring expenditure proposal of $45, 101 ,466 as compared to $42,913, 125 in 2020 proposed amended budget for an increase of $2, 188,341 or 5. 10% . PA The 2021 amount is 1 ,879,480 or 4.35% greater than the adopted 2020 budget. — 0. Recurring revenues currently exceed recurring expenditures by $ 149,953 or 0.33% of recurring revenues. 8 General Fund ■ Nonrecurring expenditures total $2, 151 ,300 and include: $212,800 of IT related capital replacements $78,900 for various Public Safety items including $37,500 for the replacement of handguns (split 50% with the County) $11 ,400 for a radar trailer $20,000 to replace the access control gate at the Precinct $10,000 to replace the fire panel at the Precinct $1 ,859,600 transfer out to the Street O&M Fund #101 to cover the deficit in recurring expenditures exceeding recurring revenues in that fund 9 General Fund The total of 2021 recurring and nonrecurring expenditures exceeds total revenues by $2,001 ,347. ■ Projected fund balance at the end of 2021 is currently $32,936,484 or 73.03% of recurring expenditures. 10 Other Funds Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax revenue that is collected by the State and remitted to the Street Fund is anticipated to be $2,062,000 Telephone Taxes that are remitted to the City and support Street Fund operations and maintenance are anticipated to be $ 1 ,431 ,000 _ Real Estate Excise Tax (REET) revenues that are in large part used to match grant financed street projects are anticipated to total $2,000,000 Other Funds Hotel/Motel Tax revenues that are dedicated to the promotion of visitors and tourism are anticipated to be $559,000 Stormwater Management Fees of $ 1 ,900,000 Aquifer Protection Area fees of $460,000 12 Other Funds — Challenges COVID-19 Pandemic revenue impacts ■ Declining revenues in the Street O&M Fund #101 that will impact our ability to deliver historic levels of service. Telephone utility tax revenues -° • Balancing the cost of pavement preservation against other transportation and infrastructure needs. Use of REET for pavement preservation limits availability of funds for grant matching Railroad grade separation projects 13 Future Council Budget Discussions Sep. 22 — Public Hearing #1 on revenues and expenditures • Oct. 13 — City Manager presentation of Preliminary 2021 Budget • Oct. 27 — Public hearing #2 on 2021 Budget Nov. 10 — First reading of ordinance adopting 2021 Budget. • Nov. 24 — Public hearing #3 and second reading of ordinance adopting 2021 Budget. 14 P:\Finance\2021 Budget\Budget Worksheets\RCAs and Intros and PowerPoint Presentations\2020 09 08\budget summary as of 2020 09 08 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 9/8/2020 2021 Budget 2020 2021 Difference Between As Proposed As Proposed 2020 and 2021 Adopted Amendment Amended Budget $ #001 -GENERAL FUND RECURRING ACTIVITY Revenues Property Tax 12,432,400 0 12,432,400 12,549,200 116,800 0.94% Sales Tax 24,632,900 (2,848,900) 21,784,000 22,220,000 436,000 2.00% Sales Tax-Public Safety 1,162,600 (128,600) 1,034,000 1,054,800 20,800 2.01% Sales Tax-Criminal Justice 2,052,300 (226,300) 1,826,000 1,862,400 36,400 1.99% Gambling Tax and Leasehold Excise Tax 384,000 (90,000) 294,000 384,000 90,000 30.61% Franchise Fees/Business Registration 1,220,000 0 1,220,000 1,215,000 (5,000) (0.41%) State Shared Revenues 1,688,200 0 1,688,200 1,760,000 71,800 4.25% Fines and Forfeitures/Public Safety 1,077,700 0 1,077,700 1,010,200 (67,500) (6.26%) Community and Public Works 2,129,800 0 2,129,800 1,908,719 (221,081) (10.38%) Recreation Program Revenues 659,200 (539,700) 119,500 643,600 524,100 438.58% Miscellaneous Department Revenue 21,000 0 21,000 21,000 0 0.00% Miscellaneous&Investment Interest 791,700 0 791,700 592,500 (199,200) (25.16%) Transfers in-#105(h/m tax-CP advertising) 30,000 0 30,000 30,000 0 0.00% Total Recurring Revenues 48,281,800 (3,833,500) 44,448,300 45,251,419 803,119 1.81% Expenditures City Council 622,187 0 622,187 631,566 9,379 1.51% City Manager 997,882 33,300 1,031,182 1,158,089 126,907 12.31% City Attorney 707,942 0 707,942 718,593 10,651 1.50% Public Safety 26,599,214 274,489 26,873,703 28,101,615 1,227,912 4.57% Deputy City Manager 277,187 0 277,187 284,844 7,657 2.76% Finance/IT 1,478,523 0 1,478,523 1,500,659 22,136 1.50% Human Resources 313,316 0 313,316 318,540 5,224 1.67% City Hall Operations and Maintenance 296,270 0 296,270 301,093 4,823 1.63% Community&Public Works-Engineering 1,971,731 (16,650) 1,955,081 2,098,642 143,561 7.34% Community&Public Works-Economic Dev 1,119,829 0 1,119,829 1,045,762 (74,067) (6.61%) Community&Public Works-Building&Planning 2,420,414 0 2,420,414 2,487,066 66,652 2.75% Parks&Rec-Administration 352,227 0 352,227 356,467 4,240 1.20% Parks&Rec-Maintenance 917,500 0 917,500 940,003 22,503 2.45% Parks&Rec-Recreation 325,921 (83,000) 242,921 328,534 85,613 35.24% Parks&Rec-Aquatics 501,853 (369,000) 132,853 510,053 377,200 283.92% Parks&Rec-Senior Center 43,447 0 43,447 35,403 (8,044) (18.51%) Parks&Rec-CenterPlace 965,359 (148,000) 817,359 972,214 154,855 18.95% General Government 1,321,111 0 1,321,111 1,297,380 (23,731) (1.80%) Transfers out-#204(2016 LTGO debt service) 401,450 0 401,450 401,500 50 0.01% Transfers out-#309(park capital projects) 160,000 0 160,000 160,000 0 0.00% Transfers out-#311 (pavement preservation) 982,023 0 982,023 991,843 9,820 1.00% Transfers out-#501 (CenterPlace kitchen reserve) 36,600 0 36,600 36,600 0 0.00% Transfers out-#502(insurance premium) 410,000 0 410,000 425,000 15,000 3.66% Total Recurring Expenditures 43,221,986 (308,861) 42,913,125 45,101,466 2,188,341 5.10% Recurring Revenues Over(Under) Recurring Expenditures 5,059,814 (3,524,639) 1,535,175 149,953 Page 1 of 20 P:\Finance\2021 Budget\Budget Worksheets\RCAs and Intros and PowerPoint Presentations\2020 09 08\budget summary as of 2020 09 08 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 9/8/2020 2021 Budget 2020 2021 Difference Between As Proposed As Proposed 2020 and 2021 Adopted Amendment Amended Budget $ #001 -GENERAL FUND-continued NONRECURRING ACTIVITY Revenues Grant Proceeds 70,000 3,026,600 3,096,600 0 (3,096,600) (100.00%) Reimbursement of chamber wall repairs 0 500,000 500,000 0 (500,000) (100.00%) Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% Total Nonrecurring Revenues 70,000 3,526,600 3,596,600 0 (3,596,600) (100.00%) Expenditures General Government-IT capital replacements 190,000 0 190,000 212,800 22,800 12.00% City Manager(office furniture for Housing Sery empl 0 5,000 5,000 0 (5,000) (100.00%) Public Safety(full facility generator) 0 58,310 58,310 0 (58,310) (100.00%) Public Safety(carpet&workstation replacement) 15,000 0 15,000 0 (15,000) (100.00%) Public Safety(replace HVAC units at Precinct) 0 60,000 60,000 0 (60,000) (100.00%) Public Safety(replace handguns) 0 0 0 37,500 37,500 0.00% Public Safety(radar trailer) 0 0 0 11,400 11,400 0.00% Public Safety(Precinct access control gate) 0 0 0 20,000 20,000 0.00% Public Safety(Precinct fire panel replacement) 0 0 0 10,000 10,000 0.00% City Hall chamber east wall repairs 0 500,000 500,000 0 (500,000) (100.00%) Economic Dev(CERB Appleway Trail Study) 0 25,000 25,000 0 (25,000) (100.00%) Economic Dev(Commerce Housing Action Plan) 0 100,000 100,000 0 (100,000) (100.00%) Building (equipment for new Code Enf.Officer) 13,700 0 13,700 0 (13,700) (100.00%) Parks&Rec(carpet at CenterPlace) 9,500 0 9,500 0 (9,500) (100.00%) General Government(City Hall generator) 0 44,993 44,993 0 (44,993) (100.00%) COVID-19 related expenditures 0 2,901,600 2,901,600 0 (2,901,600) (100.00%) Transfers out-#101 (Street Fund operations) 0 350,200 350,200 1,859,600 1,509,400 431.01% Transfers out-#122(replenish reserve) 0 500,000 500,000 0 (500,000) (100.00%) Transfers out-#309(Browns Park 2019 lmpr) 0 121,298 121,298 0 (121,298) (100.00%) Transfers out-#309(CenterPlace west lawn) 1,500,000 386,581 1,886,581 0 (1,886,581) (100.00%) Transfers out-#309(CenterPlace roof repairs) 0 810,000 810,000 0 (810,000) (100.00%) Transfers out-#312('18 fund bal>50%) 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% Transfers out-#501 (new Code Enf.Vehicle) 30,000 0 30,000 0 (30,000) (100.00%) Total Nonrecurring Expenditures 1,758,200 5,862,982 7,621,182 2,151,300 (5,469,882) (71.77%) Nonrecurring Revenues Over(Under) Nonrecurring Expenditures (1,688,200) (2,336,382) (4,024,582) (2,151,300) Excess(Deficit)of Total Revenues Over(Under)Total Expenditures 3,371,614 (5,861,021) (2,489,407) (2,001,347) Beginning unrestricted fund balance 37,427,218 37,427,218 34,937,811 Ending unrestricted fund balance 40,798,832 34,937,811 32,936,464 Fund balance as a percent of recurring expenditures 94.39% 81.42% 73.03% Page 2 of 20 P:\Finance\2021 Budget\Budget Worksheets\RCAs and Intros and PowerPoint Presentations\2020 09 08\budget summary as of 2020 09 08 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 9/8/2020 2021 Budget 2020 2021 Difference Between As Proposed As Proposed 2020 and 2021 Adopted Amendment Amended Budget $ SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS #101 -STREET FUND RECURRING ACTIVITY Revenues Utility Tax 1,521,000 0 1,521,000 1,431,000 (90,000) (5.92%) Motor Vehicle Fuel (Gas)Tax 2,046,700 (331,700) 1,715,000 2,062,000 347,000 20.23% Multimodal Transportation Revenue 131,500 (18,500) 113,000 130,600 17,600 15.58% Right-of-Way Maintenance Fee 70,000 0 70,000 70,000 0 0.00% Investment Interest 17,000 0 17,000 4,000 (13,000) (76.47%) Miscellaneous 10,000 0 10,000 10,000 0 0.00% Total Recurring Revenues 3,796,200 (350,200) 3,446,000 3,707,600 261,600 7.59% Expenditures Wages/Benefits/Payroll Taxes 1,059,613 0 1,059,613 1,127,920 68,307 6.45% Supplies 146,050 0 146,050 156,050 10,000 6.85% Services&Charges 2,426,467 0 2,426,467 2,525,828 99,361 4.09% Snow Operations 543,776 0 543,776 751,652 207,876 38.23% Intergovernmental Payments 922,000 0 922,000 935,000 13,000 1.41% Vehicle rentals-#501 (non-plow vehicle rental) 14,500 0 14,500 10,250 (4,250) (29.31%) Vehicle rentals-#501 (plow replace.) 48,500 0 48,500 60,500 12,000 24.74% Total Recurring Expenditures 5,160,906 0 5,160,906 5,567,200 406,294 7.87% Recurring Revenues Over(Under) Recurring Expenditures (1,364,706) (350,200) (1,714,906) (1,859,600) NONRECURRING ACTIVITY Revenues Transfers in-#101 0 350,200 350,200 1,859,600 1,509,400 431.01% Transfers in-#312 1,364,706 0 1,364,706 0 (1,364,706) (100.00%) Total Nonrecurring Revenues 1,364,706 350,200 1,714,906 1,859,600 144,694 8.44% Expenditures Spare traffic signal equipment 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% Total Nonrecurring Expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% Nonrecurring Revenues Over(Under) Nonrecurring Expenditures 1,364,706 350,200 1,714,906 1,859,600 Excess(Deficit)of Total Revenues Over(Under)Total Expenditures 0 0 0 0 Beginning fund balance 556,265 556,265 556,265 Ending fund balance 556,265 556,265 556,265 #103-PATHS&TRAILS FUND Revenues Motor Vehicle Fuel (Gas)Tax 8,600 0 8,600 8,700 100 1.16% Investment Interest 400 0 400 200 (200) (50.00%) Total revenues 9,000 0 9,000 8,900 (100) (1.11%) Expenditures Transfers out 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% Total expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% Revenues over(under)expenditures 9,000 9,000 8,900 Beginning fund balance 14,115 14,115 23,115 Ending fund balance 23,115 23,115 32,015 Page 3 of 20 P:\Finance\2021 Budget\Budget Worksheets\RCAs and Intros and PowerPoint Presentations\2020 09 08\budget summary as of 2020 09 08 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 9/8/2020 2021 Budget 2020 2021 Difference Between As Proposed As Proposed 2020 and 2021 Adopted Amendment Amended Budget $ SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS-continued #104-HOTEL 1 MOTEL TAX-TOURISM FACILITIES FUND Revenues Hotel/Motel Tax 420,000 (207,000) 213,000 213,000 0 0.00% Investment Interest 24,000 0 24,000 24,000 0 0.00% Transfers in-#105 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% Total revenues 444,000 (207,000) 237,000 237,000 0 0.00% Expenditures Capital Outlay 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% Total expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% Revenues over(under)expenditures 444,000 237,000 237,000 Beginning fund balance 2,690,945 2,690,945 2,927,945 Ending fund balance 3,134,945 2,927,945 3,164,945 #105-HOTEL 1 MOTEL TAX FUND Revenues Hotel/Motel Tax 650,000 (304,000) 346,000 346,000 0 0.00% Investment Interest 6,000 0 6,000 6,000 0 0.00% Total revenues 656,000 (304,000) 352,000 352,000 0 0.00% Expenditures Transfers out-#001 30,000 0 30,000 30,000 0 0.00% Transfers out-#104 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% Tourism Promotion 795,000 (476,000) 319,000 680,000 361,000 113.17% Total expenditures 825,000 (476,000) 349,000 710,000 361,000 103.44% Revenues over(under)expenditures (169,000) 3,000 (358,000) Beginning fund balance 518,240 518,240 521,240 Ending fund balance 349,240 521,240 163,240 #106-SOLID WASTE FUND Revenues Solid Waste Administrative Fee 225,000 0 225,000 225,000 0 0.00% Solid Waste Road Wear Fee 1,500,000 0 1,500,000 1,500,000 0 0.00% Investment Interest 12,000 0 12,000 12,000 0 0.00% Total revenues 1,737,000 0 1,737,000 1,737,000 0 0.00% Expenditures Education/Contract Admin 237,000 0 237,000 237,000 0 0.00% Transfers out-#311 1,500,000 13,532 1,513,532 1,500,000 (13,532) (0.89%) Total expenditures 1,737,000 13,532 1,750,532 1,737,000 (13,532) (0.77%) Revenues over(under)expenditures 0 (13,532) 0 Beginning fund balance 540,182 540,182 526,650 Ending fund balance 540,182 526,650 526,650 Page 4 of 20 P:\Finance\2021 Budget\Budget Worksheets\RCAs and Intros and PowerPoint Presentations\2020 09 08\budget summary as of 2020 09 08 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 9/8/2020 2021 Budget 2020 2021 Difference Between As Proposed As Proposed 2020 and 2021 Adopted Amendment Amended Budget $ SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS-continued #107-PEG FUND Revenues Comcast PEG contribution 79,000 0 79,000 79,000 0 0.00% Investment Interest 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% Total revenues 79,000 0 79,000 79,000 0 0.00% Expenditures PEG Reimbursement-CMTV 39,500 0 39,500 39,500 0 0.00% Capital Outlay 45,500 0 45,500 33,500 (12,000) (26.37%) Total expenditures 85,000 0 85,000 73,000 (12,000) (14.12%) Revenues over(under)expenditures (6,000) (6,000) 6,000 Beginning fund balance 128,255 128,255 122,255 Ending fund balance 122,255 122,255 128,255 #108-AFFORDABLE&SUPPORTIVE HOUSING SALES TAX FUND Revenues Affordable&Supportive Housing Sales Tax 0 144,750 144,750 193,000 48,250 33.33% Investment Interest 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% Total revenues 0 144,750 144,750 193,000 48,250 33.33% Expenditures Professional Services 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% Total expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% Revenues over(under)expenditures 0 144,750 193,000 Beginning fund balance 0 0 144,750 Ending fund balance 0 144,750 337,750 #120-CENTER PLACE OPERATING RESERVE FUND Revenues Investment Interest 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% Total revenues 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% Expenditures Operations 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% Total expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% Revenues over(under)expenditures 0 0 0 Beginning fund balance 300,000 300,000 300,000 Ending fund balance 300,000 300,000 300,000 Page 5 of 20 P:\Finance\2021 Budget\Budget Worksheets\RCAs and Intros and PowerPoint Presentations\2020 09 08\budget summary as of 2020 09 08 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 9/8/2020 2021 Budget 2020 2021 Difference Between As Proposed As Proposed 2020 and 2021 Adopted Amendment Amended Budget $ SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS-continued #121 -SERVICE LEVEL STABILIZATION RESERVE FUND Revenues Investment Interest 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% Total revenues 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% Expenditures Operations 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% Total expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% Revenues over(under)expenditures 0 0 0 Beginning fund balance 5,500,000 5,500,000 5,500,000 Ending fund balance 5,500,000 5,500,000 5,500,000 #122-WINTER WEATHER RESERVE FUND Revenues Investment Interest 5,400 0 5,400 1,900 (3,500) (64.81%) Transfers in-#001 0 500,000 500,000 0 (500,000) (100.00%) Total revenues 5,400 500,000 505,400 1,900 (503,500) (99.62%) Expenditures Street maintenance expenditures 500,000 0 500,000 500,000 0 0.00% Transfers out-#101 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% Total expenditures 500,000 0 500,000 500,000 0 0.00% Revenues over(under)expenditures (494,600) 5,400 (498,100) Beginning fund balance 23,336 23,336 528,736 Ending fund balance (471,264) 28,736 30,636 DEBT SERVICE FUNDS #204-LTGO BOND DEBT SERVICE FUND Revenues Spokane Public Facilities District 459,500 0 459,500 480,800 21,300 4.64% Transfers in-#001 401,450 0 401,450 401,500 50 0.01% Transfers in-#301 80,375 0 80,375 80,775 400 0.50% Transfers in-#302 80,375 0 80,375 80,775 400 0.50% Total revenues 1,021,700 0 1,021,700 1,043,850 22,150 2.17% Expenditures Debt Service Payments-CenterPlace 459,500 0 459,500 480,800 21,300 4.64% Debt Service Payments-Roads 160,750 0 160,750 161,550 800 0.50% Debt Service Payments-City Hall 401,450 0 401,450 401,500 50 0.01% Total expenditures 1,021,700 0 1,021,700 1,043,850 22,150 2.17% Revenues over(under)expenditures 0 0 0 Beginning fund balance 0 0 0 Ending fund balance 0 0 0 Page 6 of 20 P:\Finance\2021 Budget\Budget Worksheets\RCAs and Intros and PowerPoint Presentations\2020 09 08\budget summary as of 2020 09 08 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 9/8/2020 2021 Budget 2020 2021 Difference Between As Proposed As Proposed 2020 and 2021 Adopted Amendment Amended Budget $ CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS #301 -REET 1 CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND Revenues REET 1 -Taxes 1,000,000 0 1,000,000 1,000,000 0 0.00% Investment Interest 35,000 0 35,000 25,000 (10,000) (28.57%) Total revenues 1,035,000 0 1,035,000 1,025,000 (10,000) (0.97%) Expenditures Transfers out-#204 80,375 0 80,375 80,775 400 0.50% Transfers out-#303 1,089,148 (89,091) 1,000,057 182,900 (817,157) (81.71%) Transfers out-#311 (pavement preservation) 772,639 0 772,639 827,278 54,639 7.07% Transfers out-#314(Barker Grade Separation) 49,041 819,967 869,008 999,253 130,245 14.99% Total expenditures 1,991,203 730,876 2,722,079 2,090,206 (631,873) (23.21%) Revenues over(under)expenditures (956,203) (1,687,079) (1,065,206) Beginning fund balance 2,798,194 2,798,194 1,111,115 Ending fund balance 1,841,991 1,111,115 45,909 #302-REET 2 CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND Revenues REET 2-Taxes 1,000,000 0 1,000,000 1,000,000 0 0.00% Investment Interest 35,000 0 35,000 25,000 (10,000) (28.57%) Total revenues 1,035,000 0 1,035,000 1,025,000 (10,000) (0.97%) Expenditures Transfers out-#204 80,375 0 80,375 80,775 400 0.50% Transfers out-#303 404,318 113,881 518,199 1,380,354 862,155 166.38% Transfers out-#311 (pavement preservation) 772,638 0 772,638 827,279 54,641 7.07% Total expenditures 1,257,331 113,881 1,371,212 2,288,408 917,196 66.89% Revenues over(under)expenditures (222,331) (336,212) (1,263,408) Beginning fund balance 4,391,870 4,391,870 4,055,658 Ending fund balance 4,169,539 4,055,658 2,792,250 Page 7 of 20 P:\Finance\2021 Budget\Budget Worksheets\RCAs and Intros and PowerPoint Presentations\2020 09 08\budget summary as of 2020 09 08 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 9/8/2020 2021 Budget 2020 2021 Difference Between As Proposed As Proposed 2020 and 2021 Adopted Amendment Amended Budget $ CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS-continued #303-STREET CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND Revenues Grant Proceeds 6,596,718 206,856 6,803,574 5,220,211 (1,583,363) (23.27%) Developer 110,499 1,230,560 1,341,059 23,703 (1,317,356) (98.23%) Transfers in-#301 1,089,148 (89,091) 1,000,057 182,900 (817,157) (81.71%) Transfers in-#302 404,318 113,881 518,199 1,380,354 862,155 166.38% Transfers in-#312-Barker Corridor 39,512 455,779 495,291 0 (495,291) (100.00%) Transfers in-#312-Garland Ave 75,000 1,211,436 1,286,436 0 (1,286,436) (100.00%) Total revenues 8,315,195 3,129,421 11,444,616 6,807,168 (4,637,448) (40.52%) Expenditures 205 Sprague/Barker Intersections Improvement 195,499 0 195,499 329,453 133,954 68.52% 249 Sullivan/Wellesley Intersection 100,000 1,070,521 1,170,521 0 (1,170,521) (100.00%) 259 N. Sullivan Corridor ITS Project 810,232 111,117 921,349 0 (921,349) (100.00%) 267 Mission Ave Sidewalk 19,852 116,223 136,075 11,310 (124,765) (91.69%) 273 Barker/I-90 Interchange 90,000 478,655 568,655 0 (568,655) (100.00%) 275 Barker Rd Widening-River to Euclid 3,729,143 (1,750,748) 1,978,395 1,132,320 (846,075) (42.77%) 276 Barker Rd Widening-Euclid to Garland 0 380,269 380,269 0 (380,269) (100.00%) 285 Indiana Ave Pres-Evergreen to Sullivan 300,000 54,060 354,060 7,210 (346,850) (97.96%) 291 Adams Sidewalk Infill 444,645 0 444,645 0 (444,645) (100.00%) 293 2018 CSS Citywide Reflective Signal BP 99,000 0 99,000 74,250 (24,750) (25.00%) 294 Citywide Reflective Signal Post Panels 47,775 0 47,775 17,875 (29,900) (62.59%) 295 Garland Ave Construction 150,000 2,342,371 2,492,371 0 (2,492,371) (100.00%) 299 Argonne Rd Concrete Pvmt Indiana to Mont 32,000 0 32,000 2,392,450 2,360,450 7376.41% 300 Pines and Mission Intersection Improvement 516,000 0 516,000 498,000 (18,000) (3.49%) 301 Park and Mission Intersection Improvements 0 152,992 152,992 0 (152,992) (100.00%) 302 Ella Sidewalk-Broadway to Alki 371,760 0 371,760 0 (371,760) (100.00%) 303 S. Conklin Sidewalk 124,125 0 124,125 0 (124,125) (100.00%) 310 Sullivan Rd Overcrossing UP RR Deck Repl 0 337,625 337,625 0 (337,625) (100.00%) 313 Barker Rd/Union Pacific Crossing 0 121,500 121,500 1,312,500 1,191,000 980.25% 318 Wilbur Sidewalk-Boone to Mission 0 0 0 12,000 12,000 0.00% 320 Sullivan Preservation-Sprague to 8th 0 0 0 19,800 19,800 0.00% 069 Park Rd Reconstruction#2(Repay Grant Funds) 285,164 (285,164) 0 0 0 0.00% Contingency 1,000,000 0 1,000,000 1,000,000 0 0.00% Total expenditures 8,315,195 3,129,421 11,444,616 6,807,168 (4,637,448) (40.52%) Revenues over(under)expenditures 0 0 0 Beginning fund balance 67,402 67,402 67,402 Ending fund balance 67,402 67,402 67,402 Note: Work performed for pavement preservation projects out of the Street Capital Projects Fund is for items such as sidewalk upgrades that the were bid with the pavement preservation work. Page 8 of 20 P:\Finance\2021 Budget\Budget Worksheets\RCAs and Intros and PowerPoint Presentations\2020 09 08\budget summary as of 2020 09 08 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 9/8/2020 2021 Budget 2020 2021 Difference Between As Proposed As Proposed 2020 and 2021 Adopted Amendment Amended Budget $ CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS-continued #309-PARK CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND Revenues Grant Proceeds 2,500 1,603,083 1,605,583 480,530 (1,125,053) (70.07%) Transfers in-#001 1,660,000 1,317,879 2,977,879 160,000 (2,817,879) (94.63%) Transfers in-#312 7,500 111,873 119,373 6,650 (112,723) (94.43%) Total revenues 1,670,000 3,032,835 4,702,835 647,180 (4,055,655) (86.24%) Expenditures 268 Appleway Trail (Evergreen to Sullivan) 5,000 1,604,376 1,609,376 0 (1,609,376) (100.00%) 296 Browns Park improvements 2019 5,000 116,298 121,298 0 (121,298) (100.00%) 304 CenterPlace west lawn improvements-Ph.2 1,500,000 386,581 1,886,581 0 (1,886,581) (100.00%) 305 CenterPlace roof repairs 0 810,000 810,000 0 (810,000) (100.00%) 314 Balfour Park frontage improvements 0 59,850 59,850 6,650 (53,200) (88.89%) 315 Browns Park improvements 2020 0 62,995 62,995 499,805 436,810 693.40% 316 Balfour Park improvements-Ph 1 0 11,000 11,000 0 (11,000) (100.00%) Install stage fill speakers Great Room 0 0 0 6,346 6,346 0.00% Repair failed pixels Great Room 0 0 0 6,505 6,505 0.00% Reprogram Great Room AN System 0 0 0 12,499 12,499 0.00% Repair/replace siding at Mirabeau restroom 0 0 0 30,000 30,000 0.00% Total expenditures 1,510,000 3,051,100 4,561,100 561,805 (3,999,295) (87.68%) Revenues over(under)expenditures 160,000 141,735 85,375 Beginning fund balance 78,627 78,627 220,362 Ending fund balance 238,627 220,362 305,737 #310-CIVIC FACILITIES CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND Revenues Investment Interest 17,000 0 17,000 3,100 (13,900) (81.76%) Total revenues 17,000 0 17,000 3,100 (13,900) (81.76%) Expenditures Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% Transfers out-#312 0 16,700 16,700 0 (16,700) (100.00%) Total expenditures 0 16,700 16,700 0 (16,700) (100.00%) Revenues over(under)expenditures 17,000 300 3,100 Beginning fund balance 855,985 855,985 856,285 Ending fund balance 872,985 856,285 859,385 Note: The fund balance in#310 includes$839,281.10 paid by the Library District for 2.82 acres at the Balfour Park site. If the District does not succeed in getting a voted bond approved by October 2022 then the City may repurchase this land at the original sale price of$839,285.10. Page 9 of 20 P:\Finance\2021 Budget\Budget Worksheets\RCAs and Intros and PowerPoint Presentations\2020 09 08\budget summary as of 2020 09 08 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 9/8/2020 2021 Budget 2020 2021 Difference Between As Proposed As Proposed 2020 and 2021 Adopted Amendment Amended Budget $ CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS-continued #311 -PAVEMENT PRESERVATION Revenues Transfers in-#001 982,023 0 982,023 991,843 9,820 1.00% Transfers in-#106 1,500,000 13,532 1,513,532 1,500,000 (13,532) (0.89%) Transfers in-#301 772,639 0 772,639 827,278 54,639 7.07% Transfers in-#302 772,638 0 772,638 827,279 54,641 7.07% Grant Proceeds 10,588 0 10,588 0 (10,588) (100.00%) Total revenues 4,037,888 13,532 4,051,420 4,146,400 94,980 2.34% Expenditures Pavement preservation 4,217,523 0 4,217,523 4,676,350 458,827 10.88% Pre-project GeoTech 50,000 0 50,000 50,000 0 0.00% Total expenditures 4,267,523 0 4,267,523 4,726,350 458,827 10.75% Revenues over(under)expenditures (229,635) (216,103) (579,950) Beginning fund balance 4,425,201 4,425,201 4,209,098 Ending fund balance 4,195,566 4,209,098 3,629,148 #312-CAPITAL RESERVE FUND Revenues Transfers in-#001 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% Transfers in-#310 0 16,700 16,700 0 (16,700) (100.00%) Investment Interest 100,000 0 100,000 100,000 0 0.00% Total revenues 100,000 16,700 116,700 100,000 (16,700) (14.31%) Expenditures Transfers out-#101 1,364,706 0 1,364,706 0 (1,364,706) (100.00%) Transfers out-#303(Barker Road Corridor) 39,512 455,779 495,291 0 (495,291) (100.00%) Transfers out-#303(Garland Ave.) 75,000 1,211,436 1,286,436 0 (1,286,436) (100.00%) Transfers out-#309(Appleway Trail-Evergreen-& 7,500 41,023 48,523 0 (48,523) (100.00%) Transfers out-#309(Balfour Park frontage improve 0 59,850 59,850 6,650 (53,200) (88.89%) Transfers out-#309(Balfour Park frontage improve 0 11,000 11,000 0 (11,000) (100.00%) Transfers out-#314(Pines Rd Underpass) 64,192 3,308 67,500 64,192 (3,308) (4.90%) Transfers out-#314(Barker Rd Overpass) 0 0 0 539,716 539,716 0.00% DOT Park Property Acquisition 0 0 0 759,600 759,600 0.00% Total expenditures 1,550,910 1,782,396 3,333,306 1,370,158 (1,963,148) (58.89%) Revenues over(under)expenditures (1,450,910) (3,216,606) (1,270,158) Beginning fund balance 12,936,816 12,936,816 9,720,210 Ending fund balance 11,485,906 9,720,210 8,450,052 #313-CITY HALL CONSTRUCTION FUND Revenues Investment Interest 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% Total revenues 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% Expenditures Transfers out-#312 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% Total expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% Revenues over(under)expenditures 0 0 0 Beginning fund balance 0 0 0 Ending fund balance 0 0 0 Page 10 of 20 P:\Finance\2021 Budget\Budget Worksheets\RCAs and Intros and PowerPoint Presentations\2020 09 08\budget summary as of 2020 09 08 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 9/8/2020 2021 Budget 2020 2021 Difference Between As Proposed As Proposed 2020 and 2021 Adopted Amendment Amended Budget $ CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS-continued #314-RAILROAD GRADE SEPARATION PROJECTS FUND Revenues Grant Proceeds 12,808,751 (9,282,373) 3,526,378 11,508,819 7,982,441 226.36% Transfers in#301 49,041 819,967 869,008 999,253 130,245 14.99% Transfers in#312 64,192 3,308 67,500 603,908 536,408 794.68% Total revenues 12,921,984 (8,459,098) 4,462,886 13,111,980 8,649,094 193.80% Expenditures 143 Barker BNSF Grade Separation 11,475,292 (8,069,316) 3,405,976 9,396,870 5,990,894 175.89% 223 Pines Rd Underpass 1,562,500 (262,500) 1,300,000 4,149,450 2,849,450 219.19% Total expenditures 13,037,792 (8,331,816) 4,705,976 13,546,320 8,840,344 187.85% Revenues over(under)expenditures (115,808) (243,090) (434,340) Beginning fund balance 1,008,638 1,008,638 765,548 Ending fund balance 892,830 765,548 331,208 Page 11 of 20 P:\Finance\2021 Budget\Budget Worksheets\RCAs and Intros and PowerPoint Presentations\2020 09 08\budget summary as of 2020 09 08 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 9/8/2020 2021 Budget 2020 2021 Difference Between As Proposed As Proposed 2020 and 2021 Adopted Amendment Amended Budget $ ENTERPRISE FUNDS #402-STORMWATER FUND RECURRING ACTIVITY Revenues Stormwater Management Fees 1,900,000 0 1,900,000 1,900,000 0 0.00% Investment Interest 40,000 0 40,000 40,000 0 0.00% Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% Total Recurring Revenues 1,940,000 0 1,940,000 1,940,000 0 0.00% Expenditures Wages/Benefits/Payroll Taxes 519,582 0 519,582 538,864 19,282 3.71% Supplies 14,750 0 14,750 14,750 0 0.00% Services&Charges 1,298,153 0 1,298,153 1,320,643 22,490 1.73% Intergovernmental Payments 37,500 0 37,500 45,000 7,500 20.00% Vehicle rentals-#501 14,000 0 14,000 6,750 (7,250) (51.79%) Total Recurring Expenditures 1,883,985 0 1,883,985 1,926,007 42,022 2.23% Recurring Revenues Over(Under) Recurring Expenditures 56,015 0 56,015 13,993 NONRECURRING ACTIVITY Revenues Grant Proceeds 59,828 0 59,828 100,000 40,172 67.15% Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% Total Nonrecurring Revenues 59,828 0 59,828 100,000 40,172 67.15% Expenditures Capital-various projects 500,000 0 500,000 500,000 0 0.00% Watershed studies 80,000 0 80,000 100,000 20,000 25.00% Stormwater comprehensive plan update 100,000 0 100,000 100,000 0 0.00% Total Nonrecurring Expenditures 680,000 0 680,000 700,000 20,000 2.94% Nonrecurring Revenues Over(Under) Nonrecurring Expenditures (620,172) 0 (620,172) (600,000) Excess(Deficit)of Total Revenues Over(Under)Total Expenditures (564,157) 0 (564,157) (586,007) Beginning working capital 2,180,773 2,180,773 1,616,616 Ending working capital 1,616,616 1,616,616 1,030,609 #403-AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA Revenues Spokane County 460,000 0 460,000 460,000 0 0.00% Grant Proceeds 349,000 97,700 446,700 1,316,500 869,800 194.72% Investment Interest 20,000 0 20,000 15,000 (5,000) (25.00%) Total revenues 829,000 97,700 926,700 1,791,500 864,800 93.32% Expenditures Capital-various projects 500,000 633,571 1,133,571 1,663,227 529,656 46.72% Total expenditures 500,000 633,571 1,133,571 1,663,227 529,656 46.72% Revenues over(under)expenditures 329,000 (206,871) 128,273 Beginning working capital 2,118,299 2,118,299 1,911,428 Ending working capital 2,447,299 1,911,428 2,039,701 Page 12 of 20 P:\Finance\2021 Budget\Budget Worksheets\RCAs and Intros and PowerPoint Presentations\2020 09 08\budget summary as of 2020 09 08 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 9/8/2020 2021 Budget 2020 2021 Difference Between As Proposed As Proposed 2020 and 2021 Adopted Amendment Amended Budget $ INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS #501 -ER&R FUND Revenues Vehicle rentals-#001 28,000 0 28,000 31,300 3,300 11.79% Vehicle rentals-#101 14,500 0 14,500 10,250 (4,250) (29.31%) Vehicle rentals-#101 (plow replace.) 48,500 0 48,500 60,500 12,000 24.74% Vehicle rentals-#402 14,000 0 14,000 6,750 (7,250) (51.79%) Transfers in-#001 (CenterPlace kitchen reserve) 36,600 0 36,600 36,600 0 0.00% Transfers in-#001 (Code Enforcement Vehicle) 30,000 0 30,000 0 (30,000) (100.00%) Investment Interest 19,000 0 19,000 10,000 (9,000) (47.37%) Total revenues 190,600 0 190,600 155,400 (35,200) (18.47%) Expenditures Small tools&minor equipment 20,000 0 20,000 10,000 (10,000) (50.00%) Vehicle purchases 30,000 0 30,000 130,000 100,000 333.33% Snow plow purchase 235,000 0 235,000 0 (235,000) (100.00%) Total expenditures 285,000 0 285,000 140,000 (145,000) (50.88%) Revenues over(under)expenditures (94,400) (94,400) 15,400 Beginning working capital 1,496,093 1,496,093 1,401,693 Ending working capital 1,401,693 1,401,693 1,417,093 #502-RISK MANAGEMENT FUND Revenues Investment Interest 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% Transfers in-#001 410,000 0 410,000 425,000 15,000 3.66% Total revenues 410,000 0 410,000 425,000 15,000 3.66% Expenditures Auto&Property Insurance 410,000 0 410,000 425,000 15,000 3.66% Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% Total expenditures 410,000 0 410,000 425,000 15,000 3.66% Revenues over(under)expenditures 0 0 0 Beginning fund balance 276,004 276,004 276,004 Ending fund balance 276,004 276,004 276,004 TOTAL OF ALL FUNDS Total of Revenues for all Funds 90,026,301 (2,342,060) 87,684,241 85,748,997 Total of Expenditures for all Funds 89,998,731 6,217,782 96,216,513 93,128,465 Total grant revenues(included in total revenues) 19,897,385 (4,348,134) 15,549,251 18,626,060 Total Capital expenditures(included in total expenditures) 28,594,710 (1,354,421) 27,240,289 28,932,170 Page 13 of 20 P:\Finance\2021 Budget\Budget Worksheets\RCAs and Intros and PowerPoint Presentations\2020 09 08\budget summary as of 2020 09 08 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA I 9/8/2020 2021 Budget General Fund 2020 2020 2021 Difference Between Adopted Proposed as of $ as 2020 and 2021 Budget Amended 8/4/2020 Change revised $ I % 'RECURRING ACTIVITY Revenues Property Tax 12,432,400 12,432,400 12,549,200 0 12,549,200 116,800 0.94% Sales Tax 24,632,900 21,784,000 19,751,000 2,469,000 22,220,000 436,000 2.00% Sales Tax-Public Safety 1,162,600 1,034,000 938,000 116,800 1,054,800 20,800 2.01% Sales Tax-Criminal Justice 2,052,300 1,826,000 1,656,000 206,400 1,862,400 36,400 1.99% Gambling Tax and Leasehold Excise Tax 384,000 294,000 384,000 0 384,000 90,000 30.61% Franchise Fees/Business Registration 1,220,000 1,220,000 1,215,000 0 1,215,000 (5,000) (0.41%) State Shared Revenues 1,688,200 1,688,200 1,721,000 39,000 1,760,000 71,800 4.25% Fines and Forfeitures/Public Safety 1,077,700 1,077,700 1,010,200 0 1,010,200 (67,500) (6.26%) Community and Public Works 2,129,800 2,129,800 1,908,719 0 1,908,719 (221,081) (10.38%) Recreation Program Revenues 659,200 119,500 643,600 0 643,600 524,100 438.58% Miscellaneous Department Revenue 21,000 21,000 21,000 0 21,000 0 0.00% Miscellaneous&Investment Interest 791,700 791,700 592,500 0 592,500 (199,200) (25.16%) Transfers in-#105(h/mtax-CPadvertising) 30,000 30,000 30,000 0 30,000 0 0.00% Total Recurring Revenues 48,281,800 44,448,300 42,420,219 2,831,200 45,251,419 803,119 1.81% Expenditures City Council 622,187 622,187 631,566 0 631,566 9,379 1.51% City Manager 997,882 1,031,182 1,017,539 140,550 1,158,089 126,907 12.31% City Attorney 707,942 707,942 718,593 0 718,593 10,651 1.50% Public Safety 26,599,214 26,873,703 28,086,615 15,000 28,101,615 1,227,912 4.57% Deputy City Manager 277,187 277,187 284,844 0 284,844 7,657 2.76% Finance/IT 1,478,523 1,478,523 1,500,659 0 1,500,659 22,136 1.50% Human Resources 313,316 313,316 318,540 0 318,540 5,224 1.67% City Hall Operations and Maintenance 296,270 296,270 301,093 0 301,093 4,823 1.63%_ Community&Public Works-Engineering 1,971,731 1,955,081 2,165,242 (66,600) 2,098,642 143,561 7.34% Net Community&Public Works-Economic Dev 1,119,829 1,119,829 1,045,762 0 1,045,762 (74,067) (6.61%) - difference Community&Public Works-Building&Planni 2,420,414 2,420,414 2,483,766 3,300 2,487,066 66,652 2.75% S/36,146 Parks&Rec-Administration 352,227 352,227 356,467 0 356,467 4,240 1.20% Parks&Rec-Maintenance 917,500 917,500 940,003 0 940,003 22,503 2.45% Parks&Rec-Recreation 325,921 242,921 328,534 0 328,534 85,613 35.24% _ Net Parks&Rec-Aquatics 501,853 132,853 510,053 0 510,053 377,200 283.92% difference Parks&Rec-Senior Center 43,447 43,447 35,403 0 35,403 (8,044) (18.51%) $636,367 Parks&Rec-CenterPlace 965,359 817,359 972,214 0 972,214 154,855 18.95% General Government 1,321,111 1,321,111 1,297,380 0 1,297,380 (23,731) (1.80%) Transfers out-#204(2016 LTGO debt service) 401,450 401,450 401,500 0 401,500 50 0.01% Transfers out-#309(park capital projects) 160,000 160,000 160,000 0 160,000 0 0.00% Transfers out-#311 (pavement preservation) 982,023 982,023 991,843 0 991,843 9,820 1.00% Transfers out-#501 (CenterPlace kitchen reserve 36,600 36,600 36,600 0 36,600 0 0.00% Transfers out-#502(insurance premium) 410,000 410,000 425,000 0 425,000 15,000 3.66% Total Recurring Expenditures 43,221,986 42,913,125 45,009,216 92,250 45,101,466 2,188,341 5.10% Recurring Revenues Over(Under) Recurring Expenditures 5,059,814 1,535,175 (2,588,997) 2,738,950 149,953 Page 14 of 20 P:\Finance\2021 Budget\Budget Worksheets\RCAs and Intros and PowerPoint Presentations\2020 09 08\budget summary as of 2020 09 08 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA I 9/8/2020 2021 Budget General Fund 2020 2020 2021 Difference Between Adopted Proposed as of $ as 2020 and 2021 Budget Amended 8/4/2020 Change revised $ I % 'NONRECURRING ACTIVITY Revenues Grant Proceeds 70,000 3,096,600 0 0 0 (3,096,600) (100.00%) Reimbursement of chamber wall repairs 0 500,000 0 0 0 (500,000) (100.00%) Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% Total Nonrecurring Revenues 70,000 3,596,600 0 0 0 (3,596,600) (100,00%) Expenditures General Government-IT capital replacements 190,000 190,000 212,800 0 212,800 22,800 12.00% City Manager(office furniture for Housing Sery emt 0 5,000 0 0 0 (5,000) (100.00%) Public Safety(full facility generator) 0 58,310 0 0 0 (58,310) (100.00%) Public Safety(carpet&workstation replacement) 15,000 15,000 0 0 0 (15,000) (100.00%) Public Safety(replace HVAC units at Precinct) 0 60,000 0 0 0 (60,000) (100.00%) Public Safety(replace handguns) 0 0 0 37,500 37,500 37,500 0.00% Public Safety(radar trailer) 0 0 0 11,400 11,400 11,400 0.00% Public Safety(Precinct access control gate) 0 0 0 20,000 20,000 20,000 0.00% Public Safety(Precinct fire panel replacement) 0 0 0 10,000 10,000 10,000 0.00% City Hall chamber east wall repairs 0 500,000 0 0 0 (500,000) (100.00%) Economic Dev(CERB Appleway Trail Study) 0 25,000 0 0 0 (25,000) (100.00%) Economic Dev(Commerce Housing Action Plan) 0 100,000 0 0 0 (100,000) (100.00%) Building(equipment for new Code Enf Officer) 13,700 13,700 0 0 0 (13,700) (100.00%) Parks&Rec(carpet at CenterPlace) 9,500 9,500 0 0 0 (9,500) (100.00%) General Government(City Hall generator) 0 44,993 0 0 0 (44,993) (100.00%) COVID-19 related expenditures 0 2,901,600 0 0 0 (2,901,600) (100.00%) Transfers out-#101 (Street Fund operations) 0 350,200 1,898,050 (38,450) 1,859,600 1,509,400 431.01% Transfers out-#122(replenish reserve) 0 500,000 0 0 0 (500,000) (100.00%) Transfers out-#309(Browns Park other) 0 121,298 0 0 0 (121,298) (100.00%) Transfers out-#309(CenterPlace west lawn) 1,500,000 1,886,581 0 0 0 (1,886,581) (100.00%) Transfers out-#309(CenterPlace roof repairs) 0 810,000 0 0 0 (810,000) (100.00%) Transfers out-#312('18 fund bal>50%) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% Transfers out-#501 (new Code Enf Vehicle) 30,000 30,000 0 0 0 (30,000) (100.00%) Total Nonrecurring Expenditures 1,758,200 7,621,182 2,110,850 40,450 2,151,300 (5,469,882) (71.77%) Nonrecurring Revenues Over(Under) Nonrecurring Expenditures (1,688,200) (4,024,582) (2,110,850) (2,151,300) Excess(Deficit)of Total Revenues Over(Under)Total Expenditures 3,371,614 (2,489,407) (4,699,847) (2,001,347) Beginning unrestricted fund balance 37,427,218 37,427,218 34,937,811 34,937,811 Ending unrestricted fund balance 40,798,832 34,937,811 A 30,237,964 32,936,464 Ending fund balance as a percent of recurring expenditures=I 67.18% I I 73.03% Recurring Expenditures Public Safety 26,599,214 26,873,703 28,086,615 15,000 28,101,615 4.57% 62.31% All other departments 16,622,772 16,039,422 16,922,601 77,250 16,999,851 5.99% 37.69% 43,221,986 42,913,125 45,009,216 92,250 45,101,466 5.10% 100.00% Page 15 of 20 P:\Finance\2021 Budget\Budget Worksheets\RCAs and Intros and PowerPoint Presentations\2020 09 08\budget summary as of 2020 09 08 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 9/8/2020 General Fund #001 2021 Budget Worksheets - Expenditure Changes from August 4 to September 8, 2020 Line-Item Line-Item Account Budget @ Increase Budget @ Number Description 8/4/2020 (Decrease) 9/8/2020 Revenues 001.000.000.313.10.00 Sales Tax 19,751,000 2,469,000 22,220,000 001.000.000.313.15.00 Sales Tax- Public Safety 938,000 116,800 1,054,800 001.000.000.313.71.00 Sales Tax- Criminal Justice 1,656,000 206,400 1,862,400 001.000.000.336.06.21 MVET Criminal Justice- Population 31,000 1,000 32,000 001.000.000.336.06.42 Marijuana Excise Tax Distribution 110,000 (1,000) 109,000 001.000.000.336.06.94 Liquor Board Excise Tax 545,000 7,000 552,000 001.000.000.336.06.95 Liquor Board Profits 738,000 32,000 770,000 2,831,200 Expenditures City Manager 001.013.000.513.10.10.00 Wages R 664,421 86,352 750,773 001.013.000.513.10.20.00 Payroll Taxes and Benefits R 290,078 46,848 336,926 001.013.000.513.10.31.01 Office &Operating Supplies R 3,300 2,500 5,800 001.013.000.513.10.41.05 Professional Services R 20,000 2,500 22,500 001.013.000.513.10.42.03 Cell Phones R 1,740 600 2,340 001.013.000.513.10.43.01 Travel/Mileage R 11,500 500 12,000 001.013.000.513.10.49.02 Memberships R 2,900 250 3,150 001.013.000.513.10.49.04 Registrations R 2,300 1,000 3,300 140,550 Public Safety 001.016.000.521.20.35.04 Non-Capital Equipment for JAG Grant R 25,000 15,000 40,000 001.016.099.521.20.35.01 Non-Capital Equip(replace handguns) N 0 37,500 37,500 001.016.099.594.21.64.05 Machinery& Equipment(radar trailer) N 0 11,400 11,400 001.016.099.594.21.64.05 Machinery& Equip(access control gate) N 0 20,000 20,000 001.016.099.521.50.48.01 Bldg Repair& Maint(replace fire panel) N 0 10,000 10,000 93,900 Community& Public Works - Engineering 001.040.041.543.10.10.00 Wages R 865,353 (43,176) 822,177 001.040.041.543.10.20.00 Payroll Taxes and Benefits R 396,864 (23,424) 373,440 (66,600) Community& Public Works - Building 001.040.043.524.60.45.07 Interfund Vehicle Lease R 500 3,300 3,800 3,300 General Government 001.090.099.597.10.00.10 Transfers out-#101 N 1,898,050 (38,450) 1,859,600 (38,450) Total changes in General Fund expenditures 129,400 R = recurring 92,250 N = nonrecurring 40,450 132,700 Page 16 of 20 P:\Finance\2021 Budget\Budget Worksheets\RCAs and Intros and PowerPoint Presentations\2020 09 08\budget summary as of 2020 09 08 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 2021 Budget General Fund Department Changes from 2020 to 2021 Difference Between 2020 2020 2020 and 2021 Adopted Proposed 2021 Increase (Decrease) Budget Amended Budget $ City Council Wages, Payroll Taxes & Benefits 290,187 290,187 301,266 11,079 3.82% Supplies 4,950 4,950 5,500 550 11.11 Services &Charges 327,050 327,050 324,800 (2,250) (0.69%) Total 622,187 622,187 631,566 9,379 1.51 City Manager Wages, Payroll Taxes & Benefits 920,892 954,192 1,087,699 133,507 13.99% Supplies 4,300 4,300 6,800 2,500 58.14% Services &Charges 72,690 72,690 63,590 (9,100) (12.52%) Total 997,882 1,031,182 1,158,089 126,907 12.31 City Attorney Wages, Payroll Taxes & Benefits 616,403 616,403 627,353 10,950 1.78% Supplies 4,414 4,414 4,185 (229) (5.19%) Services &Charges 87,125 87,125 87,055 (70) (0.08%) Total 707,942 707,942 718,593 10,651 1.50% Public Safety Non-Departmental (Fines & Forfeits) 516,550 516,550 485,900 (30,650) (5.93%) Wages/Payroll Taxes/Benefits 13,266 13,266 19,000 5,734 43.22% Supplies 30,500 30,500 52,000 21,500 70.49% Other Services and Charges 587,515 337,515 277,715 (59,800) (17.72%) Intergovernmental Services 25,451,383 25,975,872 27,267,000 1,291,128 4.97% Total 26,599,214 26,873,703 28,101,615 1,227,912 4.57% Deputy City Manager Wages, Payroll Taxes & Benefits 234,012 234,012 243,944 9,932 4.24% Supplies 950 950 700 (250) (26.32%) Services &Charges 42,225 42,225 40,200 (2,025) (4.80%) Total 277,187 277,187 284,844 7,657 2.76% Finance/IT Wages, Payroll Taxes & Benefits 1,443,953 1,443,953 1,476,684 32,731 2.27% Supplies 6,450 6,450 3,000 (3,450) (53.49%) Services &Charges 28,120 28,120 20,975 (7,145) (25.41%) Total 1,478,523 1,478,523 1,500,659 22,136 1.50% Human Resources Wages, Payroll Taxes & Benefits 281,331 281,331 293,505 12,174 4.33% Supplies 1,280 1,280 1,000 (280) (21.88%) Services &Charges 30,705 30,705 24,035 (6,670) (21.72%) Total 313,316 313,316 318,540 5,224 1.67% City Hall Operations & Maintenance Wages, Payroll Taxes & Benefits 94,270 94,270 106,593 12,323 13.07% Supplies 28,000 28,000 27,000 (1,000) (3.57%) Services &Charges 174,000 174,000 167,500 (6,500) (3.74%) Total 296,270 296,270 301,093 4,823 1.63% (Continued to next page) Page 17 of 20 P:\Finance\2021 Budget\Budget Worksheets\RCAs and Intros and PowerPoint Presentations\2020 09 08\budget summary as of 2020 09 08 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 2021 Budget General Fund Department Changes from 2020 to 2021 Difference Between 2020 2020 2020 and 2021 Adopted Proposed 2021 Increase (Decrease) Budget Amended Budget $ (Continued from previous page) Community& Public Works- Engineering Wages, Payroll Taxes & Benefits 1,726,845 1,710,195 1,855,308 145,113 8.49% Supplies 32,850 32,850 30,500 (2,350) (7.15%) Services &Charges 212,036 212,036 212,834 798 0.38% Total 1,971,731 1,955,081 2,098,642 143,561 7.34% Community& Public Works- Economic Dev Wages, Payroll Taxes & Benefits 724,084 724,084 639,017 (85,067) (11.75%) Supplies 3,000 3,000 3,000 0 0.00% Services &Charges 392,745 392,745 403,745 11,000 2.80% Total 1,119,829 1,119,829 1,045,762 (74,067) (6.61%) Community& Public Works- Building & Planning Wages, Payroll Taxes & Benefits 2,044,559 2,044,559 2,134,016 89,457 4.38% Supplies 47,000 47,000 35,050 (11,950) (25.43%) Services &Charges 328,855 328,855 318,000 (10,855) (3.30%) Total 2,420,414 2,420,414 2,487,066 66,652 2.75% Parks & Rec-Admin Wages, Payroll Taxes & Benefits 283,127 283,127 292,667 9,540 3.37% Supplies 5,000 5,000 5,000 0 0.00% Services &Charges 64,100 64,100 58,800 (5,300) (8.27%) Total 352,227 352,227 356,467 4,240 1.20% Parks & Rec- Maintenance Wages, Payroll Taxes & Benefits 0 0 0 0 0.00% Supplies 3,500 3,500 3,500 0 0.00% Services &Charges 914,000 914,000 936,503 22,503 2.46% Total 917,500 917,500 940,003 22,503 2.45% Parks & Rec- Recreation Wages, Payroll Taxes & Benefits 231,081 181,081 230,484 49,403 27.28% Supplies 8,650 8,650 9,150 500 5.78% Services &Charges 86,190 53,190 88,900 35,710 67.14% Total 325,921 242,921 328,534 85,613 35.24% Parks & Rec-Aquatics Wages, Payroll Taxes & Benefits 0 0 0 0 0.00% Supplies 2,000 2,000 2,000 0 0.00% Services &Charges 499,853 130,853 508,053 377,200 288.26% Total 501,853 132,853 510,053 377,200 283.92% Parks & Rec- Senior Center Wages, Payroll Taxes & Benefits 36,347 36,347 28,303 (8,044) (22.13%) Supplies 1,600 1,600 1,600 0 0.00% Services &Charges 5,500 5,500 5,500 0 0.00% Total 43,447 43,447 35,403 (8,044) (18.51%) (Continued to next page) Page 18 of 20 P:\Finance\2021 Budget\Budget Worksheets\RCAs and Intros and PowerPoint Presentations\2020 09 08\budget summary as of 2020 09 08 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 2021 Budget General Fund Department Changes from 2020 to 2021 Difference Between 2020 2020 2020 and 2021 Adopted Proposed 2021 Increase (Decrease) Budget Amended Budget $ (Continued from previous page) Parks & Rec- CenterPlace Wages, Payroll Taxes & Benefits 538,083 468,083 542,938 74,855 15.99% Supplies 85,537 67,537 85,537 18,000 26.65% Services &Charges 341,739 281,739 343,739 62,000 22.01% Total 965,359 817,359 972,214 154,855 18.95% General Government Wages, Payroll Taxes & Benefits 0 0 0 0 0.00% Supplies 99,000 99,000 81,400 (17,600) (17.78%) Services &Charges 802,100 802,100 813,050 10,950 1.37% Intergovernmental Services 362,511 362,511 372,930 10,419 2.87% Capital outlays 57,500 57,500 30,000 (27,500) (47.83%) Total 1,321,111 1,321,111 1,297,380 (23,731) (1.80%) Transfers out-#204 debt service 401,450 401,450 401,500 50 0.01 Transfers out-#309 park capital pros 160,000 160,000 160,000 0 0.00% Transfers out-#311 Pavement Preservation 982,023 982,023 991,843 9,820 1.00% Transfers out-#501 CenterPlace Kitchen Reserve 36,600 36,600 36,600 0 0.00% Transfers out-#502 410,000 410,000 425,000 15,000 3.66% Total recurring expenditures 43,221,986 42,913,125 45,101,466 2,188,341 5.10% Summary by Category Wages, Payroll Taxes & Benefits 9,478,440 9,375,090 9,878,777 503,687 5.37% Supplies 368,981 350,981 356,922 5,941 1.69% Services &Charges 4,996,548 4,284,548 4,694,994 410,446 9.58% Transfers out-#204 401,450 401,450 401,500 50 0.01 Transfers out-#309 160,000 160,000 160,000 0 0.00% Transfers out-#311 - Pavement Presery 982,023 982,023 991,843 9,820 1.00% Transfers out-#501 36,600 36,600 36,600 0 0.00% Transfers out-#502 410,000 410,000 425,000 15,000 3.66% Non-Departmental (fines &forfeits) 516,550 516,550 485,900 (30,650) (5.93%) Intergovernmental Svc (public safety) 25,451,383 25,975,872 27,267,000 1,291,128 4.97% Intergovernmental Svc 362,511 362,511 372,930 10,419 2.87% Capital outlay 57,500 57,500 30,000 (27,500) (47.83%) 43,221,986 42,913,125 45,101,466 2,188,341 5.10% Page 19 of 20 E N U O •1. 920 + 000000 0 0 O 0 0000000000 0 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a) N 000000 0 0 LU D 0 0000000000 LO 080 0 O N N- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 •0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O D O 0 LO V N N O CO N LO N 0 0 0 0 0 0 N CO NY CO 0 N f73 OA N.: O CO O 0 O N NYr M 0 O N `- V CO r 0 Q 0 N 00 O N O d O 0 rsJ -O LO V N - LO N 0 CO N CO N 0 0 0 0 0 0 N CO V LO LO LO CO O) N 0 00 0 r 0 0 0 O coN r r M cm p O N O T d f0 In V N - InN 0 CO LO CO •- 0 0 0 0 0 0 N CO NY In In In N- 0) In 0 N- r CO N N ,_ O r r c0 �j N O N- NY = NO 0 , 0 () U cci r Off) N v t▪p _ 73 LO LO N - LO N 0 CO LO CO 0 O O O O O O N - - LO LO LO - O) LO 0 C v- I� CO N- co' �N N N co' I- 0 O O N O r (Yj 0 5 N.: 0-) N- a) O o rsJ N- LO O M LO N 0 N- 1.() LO CO O O O O O O N N- N- LO LO LO LO V LO ON Q N a0 M r M N N V N c - N 00 N- CO V I.C) W a m O• } C N N G a3 .0 o J a — a) a m c J E LO M 0 CO LO N LO N- 0 0 0 N- ' 0 0 0 LO N N- N- LO LO LO LC) ' LO a) j co v > W r r N N �j - r ^ LL W e 0 - CO V LC) cor 0 cN W 16 m ▪ Z N r N of O is q — L N a) O a s S LO M 0 CO LO N LO 0 0 0 0 N LO N- 0 0 ' N N- N- LO LO LO LO ' ' Q 13 = N v 0 W co r M co N- r M V .G �)0 -C °Z) 0 cv a CO a) '6 ON - r 1,.. U) � O Q v LL E a) a 0.. a) y to 72 Ua) cc cc 0 ~ -a_ LO M 0 CO LO N LO 0 0 0 0 N LC) N- 0 0 ' N N- N- LO N N LO NY LO N _ 0 7 QLn M N � CO rM V Q p a) c U LL 0 N- () LCj cor m Q C p N N- N O a • Q.' U) M O CO U) N LU O O O O N O O N- CO LC) N Y- Y- U) N U) U)• U) N +.. co E •O O V co co M CO V N..: O 4- a a) Q Q't cc 5 I� () Ln 03 co O Cl) m CZ Q N (13 N h E cp N a) N 0 � a) U � a a - Y LO (,) 0 CO r N r 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 CO CO LO N N- N- LO N LO LO LO N 0 CU o) E o) o co O N M V U) - co a G c a ca 5 N- co L t -Q OU 0 z a) N a 'y LL = U) M O N- Y- N Ln 0 0 0 0 CO 0 0 CO U) U) N U) U) U) U) U) U) N m 4... Q U (j co N I� a0N V M V v_ r O � Opa) 5 ha a) a t▪o- N ON co CZ O .c N .E N � N ,-i LOMOr N- N LO O O O O M00 CO LO LO N N- N- LO LO LO LO NY LO a) O W a a) � a NN.- N- M N NO .0) O U cp rL.Z.v 0 r op ,0 om W mW Um t � Z z a) +L.. O m LL F- LL, Oa > Lo0 L d C �. C C a) W C) a) W D C E C E U N a) LL Y a3 Q C Q.5 CCU U O C O O a) a) a) dO a) d O2 U -O >' Ul C 0 0 O O M C O 0 0 d D a3 C C '— 0 c 0 E U C C c o LL C a) O U a3 N E ,C -O a) a) a) LL 3U C 0 0 Q � cnU c fl LL m .N 'E Q a) rn m as (o N > T N - Q•E c U .0 OC a) .c 'C U U U U U c LL U Ul a) rn C >' a) ) O — E O > rn c a) a) a) a) w C a) ro o O C U 7 'O U a) C N '7 Q' Q' Q' Q' a) ) N E H O c oM T0 ' > � w w CO Qw aw d m dS co co co C9 92 O LL ' Q Q a) E _ >,> > > 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y Y Y - p i i ' p 3 a) ,C 3 3 !- d d d W W W W W W �p �p �p �p H OV H oUUd0L.L2 d U U U U UUUUUUdddd 00M0 DRAFT ADVANCE AGENDA as of September 3,2020; 8:30 a.m. Please note this is a work in progress; items are tentative To: Council& Staff From: City Clerk,by direction of City Manager Re: Draft Schedule for Upcoming Council Meetings Sept 15,2020, Study Session,6:00 p.m. [due Tue Sept 81 1. Outside Agency Presentation(max 5 minutes each)—Chelsie Taylor (— 130 mins) 2.Advance Agenda—Mayor Wick (5 minutes) Sept 22,2020,Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Tue Sept 151 1. Public Hearing#1 —2021 Budget Revenues and Property Taxes—Chelsie Taylor (15 minutes) 2. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes, Set 2021 budget hearing #2 for Oct 27) (5 minutes) 3. Second Reading Ordinance 20-011 Amend SVMC 9.20 Motorized Personal Trans. Device—Lamb (15 min) 4.Admin Report: CTA 2020-0003 Nonconforming Use Code Text Amendment—Lori Barlow (15 minutes) 5.Admin Report: Homeless Shelter Updates—Mark Calhoun,John Hohman,Morgan Koudelka (15 minutes) 6.Admin Report: State Legislative Agenda— Cary Driskell,John Hohman,Mark Calhoun (15 minutes) 7.Admin Report: Washington State Dept. of Trans Land Acquisition,Flora Road—C. Driskell (10 minutes) 8.Admin Report: Public Comment Process— Cary Driskell (15 minutes) 9.Admin Report: Advance Agenda—Mayor Wick (5 minutes) 10. Info Only: Department Monthly Reports [*estimated meeting: 110 mins] Sept 29,2020, Study Session,6:00 p.m. [due Tue Sept 221 1. Proposed Ordinance Adopting 2021 Property Taxes—Chelsie Taylor (10 minutes) 2. Proposed Code Amendments Relating to Cable Franchises—J. Pietro,M.Koudelka, C. Driskell(20 min) 3.Advance Agenda—Mayor Wick (5 minutes) Oct 6,2020,Study Session,6:00 p.m. 1due Tue Sept 291 1.Advance Agenda—Mayor Wick (5 minutes) Oct 13,2020,Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Tue Oct 61 1. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 2.First Reading Ordinance,Nonconforming Use Code Text Amendment 2020-0003—Lori Barlow(15 mins) 3.Admin Report: City Manager Presents 2021 Preliminary Budget—Mark Calhoun (60 minutes) 4.Admin Report: Advance Agenda—Mayor Wick (5 minutes) Oct 20,2020, Study Session,6:00 p.m. [due Tue Oct 131 ACTION ITEMS: 1.Motion Consideration: Awards to Outside Agencies—Chelsie Taylor (20 minutes) NON-ACTION ITEMS: 2.Advance Agenda—Mayor Wick (5 minutes) Oct 27,2020,Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. [due Tue Oct 201 1. Public Hearing#2—2021 Budget—Chelsie Taylor (15 minutes) 2. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 3. Second Reading Ordinance,Nonconforming Use Code Text Amend. 2020-0003 —Lori Barlow(15 mins) 4.First Reading Property Tax Ordinance —Chelsie Taylor (10 minutes) 5.Admin Report: 2020 Budget Amendment—Chelsie Taylor (10 minutes) 6.Admin Report: Advance Agenda—Mayor Wick (5 minutes) 7. Info Only: Department Monthly Reports [*estimated meeting: 60 mins] Nov 3,2020, Study Session,6:00 p.m. Idue Tue Oct 271 1.Advance Agenda—Mayor Wick (5 minutes) Draft Advance Agenda 9/3/2020 9:14:48 AM Page 1 of 2 Nov 10, 2020,Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Tue Nov 31 1. Public Hearing: 2020 Budget Amendment—Chelsie Taylor (10 minutes) 2. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 3. Second Reading Property Tax Ordinance —Chelsie Taylor (10 minutes) 4.First Reading Ordinance 2020 Budget Amendment— Chelsie Taylor (10 minutes) 5.First Reading Ordinance Adopting 2021 Budget—Chelsie Taylor (10 minutes) 6.Admin Report: Advance Agenda—Mayor Wick (5 minutes) Nov 24,2020,Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Tue Nov 101 1. Public Hearing#3—2021 Budget— Chelsie Taylor (10 minutes) 2. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 3. Second Reading Ordinance 2020 Budget Amendment—Chelsie Taylor (10 minutes) 4. Second Reading Ordinance Adopting 2021 Budget—Chelsie Taylor (10 minutes) 5.Admin Report: LTAC Recommendations to Council—Chelsie Taylor (15 minutes) 6.Admin Report: 2021 Fee Resolution— Chelsie Taylor (15 minutes) 7.Admin Report: Advance Agenda—Mayor Wick (5 minutes) 8. Info Only: Department Monthly Reports [*estimated meeting: 70 mins] Dec 1,2020,Study Session, 6:00 p.m. - Cancelled due to Thanksgiving Holiday December 8,2020,Regular Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. [due Tue Dec 1] 1. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 2. Resolution for 2021 Fees(if changes are needed)—Chelsie Taylor (10 minutes) 3.Motion Consideration: Award Lodging Tax for 2021 —Chelsie Taylor (15 minutes) 4.Admin Report: Tourism Venues—John Hohman (15 minutes) 5.Admin Report: Advance Agenda—Mayor Wick (5 minutes) Dec 15,2020, Study Session,6:00 p.m. [due Tue Dec 81 1.Advance Agenda—Mayor Wick (5 minutes) December 22,2020,Regular Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Tue Dec 15] 1. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 2.Admin Report: Advance Agenda—Mayor Wick (5 minutes) Dec 29,2020, Study Session,6:00 p.m. [due Tue Dec 221 1.Advance Agenda—Mayor Wick (5 minutes) 2. Info Only: Department Monthly Reports Jan 5,2021,Study Session,6:00 p.m. [due Tue Dec 291 1.Advance Agenda—Mayor Wick (5 minutes) *time for public or Council comments not included OTHER PENDING AND/OR UPCOMING ISSUES/MEETINGS: Appleway Trail Amenities SPEC Report/Update Arts Council Sculpture Presentations St. Illumination(owners,cost,location) Artwork&Metal Boxes St. O&M Pavement Preservation Core Beliefs Resolution TPA Interlocal Agreement Donation Recognition Trunk or Treat Fee Resolution Cost of Service Analysis Water Districts& Green Space Flashing Beacons/School Signage Way Finding Signs Health District Stats Mirabeau Park Forestry Mgmt. Naming City Facilities Protocol Park Lighting PFD Presentation Draft Advance Agenda 9/3/2020 9:14:48 AM Page 2 of 2 FINANCE DEPARTMENT Sijökane Chelsie Taylor,Finance Director 4000\s'l1e ' 10210 E Sprague Avenue • Spokane Valley WA 99206 [[ii J Phone: (509)720-5000 •Fax: (509)720-5075 • www.spokanevalley.org Memorandum To: Mark Calhoun, City Manager From: Chelsie Taylor, Finance Director Date: August 31, 2020 Re: Finance Department Activity Report—July 2020 Following is information pertaining to Finance Department activities through the end of July 2020 and included herein is an updated 2020 Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures through the end of July. 2019 Year-end Process The 2019 books were closed in May and the annual financial report was completed and filed on June 17th. The State Auditor's Office arrived on site on June 22nd and are currently working on completing the single audit and financial statement portions of the audit. We do not expect the audit to be completed before the end of the summer. 2021 Budclet Development The 2021 Budget development process began in the Finance Department in early March, and on April 7th we sent detailed budget requests to all departments to complete by mid-May. By the time the budget is scheduled to be adopted on November 24th, the Council will have had an opportunity to discuss the budget on seven occasions including three public hearings. • August 4 Council budget workshop • September 8 Admin report on 2021 revenues and expenditures • September 22 Public hearing #1 on the 2021 revenues and expenditures • October 13 City Manager's presentation of preliminary 2021 Budget • October 27 Public hearing #2 on 2021 Budget • November 10 First reading on proposed ordinance adopting the 2021 Budget • November 24 Public hearing #3 on the 2021 Budget • November 24 Second reading on proposed ordinance adopting the 2021 Budget 2021 Property Tax Levy A significant part of the budget development process includes the annual levy of property taxes which in 2021 are expected to account for approximately 29.58% of recurring General Fund revenues. Council discussions specifically related to this topic will take place at the following meetings: • September 22 Public hearing on 2021 revenues including property taxes • September 29 Admin Report on proposed ordinance levying 2021 property taxes • October 27 First reading of ordinance levying 2021 property taxes and confirming tax levy • November 10 Second reading of ordinance levying 2021 property taxes and confirming tax levy P:1FinancelFinance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports1202012020 07 31.docx Page 1 Outside Aciency Fundinci in the 2021 Budciet The City has historically provided funding for local organizations involved in either social services or economic development activities and the preliminary 2021 Budget currently has $244,000 collectively available for this, with $62,000 being set aside for contracted economic development. The schedule leading to awarding funds is as follows: • July 10 Letters mailed to agencies that have historically received funding, media release to City website and notice to newspapers • August 7 Agency requests are due at City Hall • September 15 Economic development and social service agency presentations to Council • October 20 Council makes final determination of awards Budciet to Actual Comparison Report A report reflecting 2020 Budget to Actual Revenues and Expenditures for those funds for which a 2020 Budget was adopted is located on pages 6 through 18. Because we attempt to provide this information in a timely manner, this report is prepared from records that are not formally closed by the Finance Department at month end or reconciled to bank records. Although it is realistic to expect the figures will change over subsequent weeks, I believe the report is materially accurate. We've included the following information in the report: • Revenues by source for all funds, and expenditures by department in the General Fund and by type in all other funds. • A breakdown between recurring and nonrecurring revenues and expenditures in the General Fund, Street O&M Fund and Stormwater Fund. • The change in fund balance including beginning and ending figures. The beginning fund balance figures are those that are reflected in our 2019 Annual Financial Report. • Columns of information include: o The 2020 Budget as adopted o July 2020 activity o Cumulative 2020 activity through July 2020 o Budget remaining in terms of dollars o The percent of budgeted revenue collected or budgeted expenditures disbursed A few points related to the General Fund #001 (page 6): Recurring revenues collections are currently at 49.63% of the amount budgeted with 58.33% of the year elapsed. • Property taxes are paid to Spokane County in two installments each year on April 30 and October 31 and are then remitted to the City primarily in May and November with lesser amounts typically remitted in June and December. Property taxes received thus far in 2020 are $6,749,876 or 54.29% of the amount budgeted. The amount as a percentage of the budget is less than the same period in 2019 due to Spokane County extending the deadline for property owners to pay property taxes. • Sales tax collections represent only six months of collections thus far because taxes collected in July are not remitted to the City by the State until the latter part of August. Collections are currently at$11,289,480 or 45.83% of the amount budgeted. The Department of Revenue allowed delayed filing of sales tax returns due to the COVID-19 pandemic which were remitted to the City in July. The City is lagging slightly behind 2019 collections due to the pandemic, and we are watching revenue collections closely. P:1FinancelFinance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports1202012020 07 31.docx Page 2 • Gambling taxes are at $51,287 or 13.36% of the amount budgeted. Gambling taxes are paid quarterly with first quarter payments due by April 30 and second quarter payments due by July 31st. However, due to COVID-19, Council approved the delay of first quarter payments of gambling taxes until September 30 and second quarter until November 30. • Franchise Fee and Business Registration revenues are typically received in the month following a calendar year quarter. So far in 2020 we have received $345,742 or 28.34% of the amount budgeted. • State shared revenues are composed of State of Washington distributions that include items such as liquor board profits, liquor excise tax, streamlined sales tax mitigation and criminal justice monies. Most of these revenues are paid by the State in the month following a calendar quarter. Through July we've received remittances totaling $1,145,938 or 67.88% of the amount budgeted. • Fines and forfeitures revenues are composed of monthly remittances from Spokane County with payments made in the month following the actual assessment of a fine and false alarm fees. Through July we've received remittances through the month of June with receipts of $380,527 or 35.31% of the amount budgeted. • Community and Public Works service revenues are largely composed of building permit and plan review fees as well as right of way permits. Revenues are currently at$2,133,184 or 100.16% of the amount budgeted. • Recreation program revenues are composed of revenues generated by the variety of parks and recreation programs including classes, swimming pools (in-season), and CenterPlace. Currently, revenues total $134,109 or 20.34% of the amount budgeted. We're seeing a significant decrease in 2020 revenues due to not being able to operate the City's normal recreation and aquatics activities with the COVID-19 pandemic. Recurring expenditures are currently at$22,149,956 or 51.25% of the amount budgeted with 58.33% of the year elapsed. Investments (page 19) Investments at July 31 total $74,078,306 and are composed of $68,900,816 in the Washington State Local Government Investment Pool and $5,177,490 in bank CDs. Total Sales Tax Receipts (page 20) Total sales tax receipts reflect State remittances through July and total $12,765,775 including general, criminal justice, and public safety taxes. This figure is $127,923 or 0.99% less than the same six-month period in 2019. Part of the decrease is due to the Department of Revenue allowing delayed filings for sales tax returns, and we expect to make up some of the decrease once those delayed filings are received. Economic Indicators (pages 21 —23) The following economic indicators provide information pertaining to three different sources of tax revenue that provide a good gauge of the health and direction of the overall economy. 1. Sales taxes (page 21) provide a sense of how much individuals and businesses are spending on the purchase of goods. 2. Hotel / Motel taxes (page 22) provide us with a sense of overnight stays and visits to our area by tourists or business travelers. 3. Real Estate Excise taxes (page 23) provide us with a sense of real estate sales. P:1FinancelFinance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports1202012020 07 31.docx Page 3 Page 21 provides a 10-year history of general sales tax receipts (not including public safety or criminal justice) with monthly detail beginning January 2011. • Compared with calendar year 2019, 2020 collections have decreased by $118,929 or 1.04%. • Tax receipts reached an all-time high in 2019 at $24,204,762, besting the previous record year of 2018 when $22,642,856 was collected. • This activity reflects the effects of COVID-19 on the economy. Page 22 provides a 10-year history of hotel/motel tax receipts with monthly detail beginning January 2011. • Compared with calendar year 2019, 2020 collections have decreased by$115,788 or 39.76%. • Collections reached an all-time high in 2019 of$743,851, exceeding the previous high set in 2018 of$646,976. • This activity reflects the effects of COVID-19 on the economy. Page 23 provides a 10-year history of real estate excise tax receipts with monthly detail beginning January 2011. • Compared with calendar year 2019, 2020 collections have decreased by $143,948 or 9.06%. • Collections reached an all-time high in 2018 of $3,800,432, and subsequently decreased to $3,333,549 in 2019. • This activity reflects the effects of COVID-19 on the economy. Debt Capacity and Bonds Outstandinci (page 24) This page provides information on the City's debt capacity, or the dollar amount of General Obligation (G.O.) Bonds the City may issue, as well as an amortization schedule of the bonds the City currently has outstanding. • The maximum amount of G.O. bonds the City may issue is determined by the assessed value for property taxes which for 2020 is $10,200,357,539. Following the December 1, 2019 debt service payments, the City has $11,715,000 of nonvoted G.O. bonds outstanding which represents 7.66% of our nonvoted bond capacity, and 1.53% of our total debt capacity for all types of bonds. Of this amount: o $4,390,000 remains on bonds issued for the construction of CenterPlace. These bonds are repaid with a portion of the 1/10 of 1% sales tax that is collected by the Spokane Public Facilities District. o $590,000 remains on bonds issued for road and street improvements around CenterPlace. The bonds are repaid with a portion of the real estate excise tax collected by the City. o $6,735,000 remains on bonds issued for construction of the new City Hall. The bonds are to be repaid with General Fund revenues. Street Fund Revenue Sources (pages 25 and 26) The last two charts reflect a history for the two primary sources of revenue in Street Fund #101. These include: • Page 25 provides a 10-year history of Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax collections with monthly detail beginning January 2011. o Compared with calendar year 2019, 2020 collections have decreased by $148,553 or 15.36%. o Tax receipts peaked in 2007 at just approximately $2.1 million, and subsequently decreased to a range of approximately $1,858,000 to $2,027,000 in the years 2011 through 2019. o This activity reflects the effects of COVID-19 on the economy. P:1FinancelFinance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports1202012020 07 31.docx Page 4 • Page 26 provides a 10-year history of Telephone Utility Tax collections with monthly detail beginning January 2011. o Compared with 2019, 2020 collections have decreased by $76,034 or 9.51%. Unlike tax revenues collected by the State and remitted monthly, these taxes are paid to the City directly by the service provider. Consequently there is not a"clean cutoff' in terms of when a vendor pays the tax. o Tax receipts peaked in 2009 at $3,054,473 and have decreased each year since due to what we suspect is the reduction in land lines by individual households. o The 2020 Budget is set at $1,521,000. We will watch actual receipts closely as the year progresses. o The City has hired a consultant to perform an audit of providers who pay the telephone utility tax. The audit will assess whether providers are accurately remitting all taxes owed to the City, and the consultant will be paid on a contingent basis out of revenues recovered from the telephone providers. Three audits have been completed, and the City has received payments totaling $398,865 which is comprised of recovered revenue plus interest and penalty fees. Per the contract with the consultant, the City paid $99,716 or 25% of the amount recovered. P:1FinancelFinance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports1202012020 07 31.docx Page 5 P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2020\2020 07 31 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA Budget Year 2020 Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures Elapsed= 58.33% For the Seven-Month Period Ended July 31,2020 2020 Actual Actual through Budget %of Budget July July 31 Remaining Budget #001 -GENERAL FUND RECURRING ACTIVITY Revenues Property Tax 12,432,400 820,420 6,749,876 (5,682,524) 54.29% Sales Tax 24,632,900 2,291,842 11,289,480 (13,343,420) 45.83% Sales Tax-Public Safety 1,162,600 100,225 536,286 (626,314) 46.13% Sales Tax-Criminal Justice 2,052,300 178,703 940,009 (1,112,291) 45.80% Gambling Tax and Leasehold Excise Tax 384,000 22,284 51,287 (332,713) 13.36% Franchise Fees/Business Registration 1,220,000 9,343 345,742 (874,258) 28.34% State Shared Revenues 1,688,200 319,887 1,145,938 (542,262) 67.88% Fines, Forfeitures and Penalties 1,077,700 63,321 380,527 (697,173) 35.31% Community and Public Works 2,129,800 195,569 2,133,184 3,384 100.16% Recreation Program Revenues 659,200 (2,161) 134,109 (525,091) 20.34% Miscellaneous Department Revenue 21,000 0 20,940 (60) 99.72% Miscellaneous&Investment Interest 791,700 58,998 236,576 (555,124) 29.88% Transfers in-#105(h/m tax-CP advertising) 30,000 0 0 (30,000) 0.00% Total Recurring Revenues 48,281,800 4,058,431 23,963,953 (24,317,847) 49.63% Expenditures City Council 622,187 27,589 333,066 289,121 53.53% City Manager 997,882 72,599 514,562 483,320 51.57% City Attorney 707,942 55,092 363,714 344,228 51.38% Public Safety 26,599,214 1,889,430 14,091,739 12,507,475 52.98% Deputy City Manager 277,187 19,208 172,099 105,088 62.09% Finance/IT 1,478,523 109,592 767,284 711,239 51.90% Human Resources 313,316 26,021 172,306 141,010 54.99% City Hall Operations and Maintenance 296,270 30,517 174,795 121,475 59.00% Community&Public Works-Engineering 1,971,731 124,960 875,174 1,096,557 44.39% Community&Public Works-Econ Dev 1,119,829 102,862 551,298 568,531 49.23% Community&Public Works-Bldg&Plan 2,420,414 181,792 1,301,517 1,118,897 53.77% Parks&Rec-Administration 352,227 25,429 174,056 178,171 49.42% Parks&Rec-Maintenance 917,500 85,778 458,571 458,929 49.98% Parks&Rec-Recreation 325,921 15,875 98,302 227,619 30.16% Parks&Rec-Aquatics 501,853 26,459 54,479 447,374 10.86% Parks&Rec-Senior Center 43,447 2,430 17,509 25,938 40.30% Parks&Rec-CenterPlace 965,359 46,820 390,984 574,375 40.50% General Government 1,321,111 94,312 544,534 776,577 41.22% Transfers out-#204('16 LTGO bond debt service) 401,450 33,454 167,271 234,179 41.67% Transfers out-#309(park capital projects) 160,000 13,333 93,333 66,667 58.33% Transfers out-#311 (Pavement Preservation) 982,023 81,835 572,847 409,176 58.33% Transfers out-#501 (CenterPlace kitchen reserve) 36,600 3,050 21,350 15,250 58.33% Transfers out-#502(insurance premium) 410,000 34,167 239,167 170,833 58.33% Total Recurring Expenditures 43,221,986 3,102,606 22,149,956 21,072,030 51.25% Recurring Revenues Over(Under) Recurring Expenditures 5,059,814 955,825 1,813,997 (3,245,817) Page 6 P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2020\2020 07 31 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA Budget Year 2020 Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures Elapsed= 58.33% For the Seven-Month Period Ended July 31,2020 2020 Actual Actual through Budget %of Budget July July 31 Remaining Budget #001 -GENERAL FUND-continued NONRECURRING ACTIVITY Revenues Potential Settlement Proceeds 0 0 0 0 0.00% Grant Proceeds 70,000 2,702 17,039 (52,961) 24.34% Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 0.00% Total Nonrecurring Revenues 70,000 2,702 17,039 (52,961) 24.34% Expenditures Public Safety(carpet&workstation replacement) 15,000 0 0 15,000 0.00% Public Safety(full facility generator) 0 0 86,109 (86,109) 0.00% Public Safety(SV Police Athletic League Grant) 0 0 1,263 (1,263) 0.00% City Hall Chambers(east wall repairs) 0 12,724 198,924 (198,924) 0.00% Building(equipment for new code enf officer) 13,700 0 0 13,700 0.00% Community&Public Works(Appleway Trail ED Sti 0 2,568 25,286 (25,286) 0.00% Community&Public Works(Housing Action Plan) 0 1,629 1,629 (1,629) 0.00% Parks&Rec(CenterPlace carpeting) 9,500 0 0 9,500 0.00% General Government (City Hall generator) 0 0 250 (250) 0.00% General Government-IT capital replacements 190,000 0 85,054 104,946 44.77% Gen Gov(Covid-19 Emergency Social Serv.) 0 0 33,000 (33,000) 0.00% Transfers out-#122(replenish reserve) 0 0 0 0 0.00% Transfers out-#309(CenterPlace West Lawn) 1,500,000 0 0 1,500,000 0.00% Transfers out-#501 (new code enf vehicle) 30,000 0 0 30,000 0.00% Total Nonrecurring Expenditures 1,758,200 16,920 431,514 1,326,686 24.54% Nonrecurring Revenues Over(Under) Nonrecurring Expenditures (1,688,200) (14,218) (414,475) 1,273,725 Excess(Deficit)of Total Revenues Over(Under)Total Expenditures 3,371,614 941,607 1,399,522 (1,972,092) Beginning fund balance 37,427,218 37,427,218 Ending fund balance 40,798,832 38,826,739 Page 7 P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2020\2020 07 31 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA Budget Year 2020 Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures Elapsed= 58.33% For the Seven-Month Period Ended July 31,2020 2020 Actual Actual through Budget %of Budget July July 31 Remaining Budget SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS #101 -STREET FUND RECURRING ACTIVITY Revenues Telephone Utility Tax 1,521,000 117,855 723,567 (797,433) 47.57% Motor Vehicle Fuel(Gas)Tax 2,046,700 127,820 847,927 (1,198,773) 41.43% Multimodal Transportation 131,500 0 32,965 (98,535) 25.07% Right-of-Way Maintenance Fee 70,000 0 6,870 (63,130) 9.81% Investment Interest 17,000 176 523 (16,477) 3.08% Miscellaneous Revenue 10,000 0 344 (9,656) 3.44% Total Recurring Revenues 3,796,200 245,851 1,612,197 (2,184,003) 42.47% Expenditures Wages/Benefits/Payroll Taxes 1,059,613 66,690 550,858 508,755 51.99% Supplies 146,050 5,529 82,060 63,990 56.19% Services&Charges 2,426,467 27,632 789,038 1,637,429 32.52% Snow Operations 543,776 4,748 465,231 78,545 85.56% Intergovernmental Payments 922,000 12,503 239,031 682,969 25.93% Transfers out-#501 (non-plow vehicle rental) 14,500 1,208 8,458 6,042 58.33% Transfers out-#501 (plow replace) 48,500 4,042 28,292 20,208 58.33% Total Recurring Expenditures 5,160,906 122,351 2,162,969 2,997,937 41.91% Recurring Revenues Over(Under) Recurring Expenditures (1,364,706) 123,500 (550,772) 813,934 NONRECURRING ACTIVITY Revenues Insurance Proceeds(traffic signal cabinet) 0 0 1,258 1,258 0.00% Transfers in-#312 1,364,706 113,726 796,079 (568,628) 58.33% Total Nonrecurring Revenues 1,364,706 113,726 797,336 (567,370) 58.43% Expenditures Emergency Traffic Control Repairs 0 0 7,142 (7,142) 0.00% Total Nonrecurring Expenditures 0 0 7,142 (7,142) 0.00% Nonrecurring Revenues Over(Under) Nonrecurring Expenditures 1,364,706 113,726 790,195 (574,511) Excess(Deficit)of Total Revenues Over(Under)Total Expenditures 0 237,225 239,423 239,423 Beginning fund balance 556,265 556,265 Ending fund balance 556,265 795,688 #103-PATHS&TRAILS Revenues Motor Vehicle Fuel(Gas)Tax 8,600 539 3,576 (5,024) 41.59% Investment Interest 400 4 55 (345) 13.78% Total revenues 9,000 543 3,631 (5,369) 40.35% Expenditures Capital Outlay 0 0 0 0 0.00% Total expenditures 0 0 0 0 0.00% Revenues over(under)expenditures 9,000 543 3,631 (5,369) Beginning fund balance 14,115 14,115 Ending fund balance 23,115 17,747 Page 8 P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2020\2020 07 31 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA Budget Year 2020 Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures Elapsed= 58.33% For the Seven-Month Period Ended July 31,2020 2020 Actual Actual through Budget %of Budget July July 31 Remaining Budget SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS-continued #104-TOURISM FACILITIES HOTEL/MOTEL TAX FUND Revenues Tourism Facilities Hotel/Motel Tax 420,000 17,951 110,333 (309,667) 26.27% Investment Interest 24,000 624 9,626 (14,374) 40.11% Transfers in-#105 0 0 0 0 0.00% Total revenues 444,000 18,575 119,959 (324,041) 27.02% Expenditures Capital Expenditures 0 0 0 0 0.00% Total expenditures 0 0 0 0 0.00% Revenues over(under)expenditures 444,000 18,575 119,959 (324,041) Beginning fund balance 2,690,945 2,690,945 Ending fund balance 3,134,945 2,810,904 #105-HOTEL/MOTEL TAX FUND Revenues Hotel/Motel Tax 650,000 28,910 175,409 (474,591) 26.99% Investment Interest 6,000 143 2,102 (3,898) 35.03% Total revenues 656,000 29,053 177,510 (478,490) 27.06% Expenditures Transfers out-#001 30,000 0 0 30,000 0.00% Transfers out-#104 0 0 0 0 0.00% Tourism Promotion 795,000 0 50,802 744,198 6.39% Total expenditures 825,000 0 50,802 774,198 6.16% Revenues over(under)expenditures (169,000) 29,053 126,708 (1,252,688) Beginning fund balance 518,240 518,240 Ending fund balance 349,240 644,948 #106-SOLID WASTE Revenues Solid Waste Administrative Fees 225,000 8,945 96,707 128,293 42.98% Solid Waste Road Wear Fee 1,500,000 104,548 691,732 808,268 46.12% Investment Interest 12,000 288 6,404 5,596 53.37% Total revenues 1,737,000 113,781 794,842 942,158 45.76% Expenditures Transfers out-#311 1,500,000 0 0 1,500,000 0.00% Education&Contract Administration 237,000 6,959 42,799 194,201 18.06% Total expenditures 1,737,000 6,959 42,799 1,694,201 2.46% Revenues over(under)expenditures 0 106,822 752,044 (752,044) Beginning fund balance 540,182 540,182 Ending fund balance 540,182 1,292,226 #107-PEG FUND Revenues Comcast PEG Contribution 79,000 0 19,573 59,427 24.78% Investment Interest 0 33 473 (473) 0.00% Total revenues 79,000 33 20,046 58,954 25.37% Expenditures PEG Reimbursement-CMTV 39,500 0 0 39,500 0.00% Capital Outlay 45,500 0 1,331 44,169 2.93% Total expenditures 85,000 0 1,331 83,669 1.57% Revenues over(under)expenditures (6,000) 33 18,715 (24,715) Beginning fund balance 128,255 128,255 Ending fund balance 122,255 146,970 Page 9 P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2020\2020 07 31 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA Budget Year 2020 Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures Elapsed= 58.33% For the Seven-Month Period Ended July 31,2020 2020 Actual Actual through Budget %of Budget July July 31 Remaining Budget SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS-continued #108-AFFORDABLE&SUPPORTIVE HOUSING TAX FUND Revenues Affordable&Supportive Housing Tax 0 17,759 30,624 (30,624) 0.00% Investment Interest 0 7 10 (10) 0.00% Total revenues 0 17,766 30,635 (30,635) 0.00% Expenditures Affordable&Supportive Housing Program 0 0 0 0 0.00% Total expenditures 0 0 0 0 0.00% Revenues over(under)expenditures 0 17,766 30,635 (30,635) Beginning fund balance 0 0 Ending fund balance 0 30,635 #120-CENTER PLACE OPERATING RESERVE FUND Revenues Investment Interest 0 0 0 0 0.00% Transfers in 0 0 0 0 0.00% Total revenues 0 0 0 0 0.00% Expenditures Operations 0 0 0 0 0.00% Total expenditures 0 0 0 0 0.00% Revenues over(under)expenditures 0 0 0 0 Beginning fund balance 300,000 300,000 Ending fund balance 300,000 300,000 #121 -SERVICE LEVEL STABILIZATION RESERVE FUND Revenues Investment Interest 0 0 0 0 0.00% Transfers in 0 0 0 0 0.00% Total revenues 0 0 0 0 0.00% Expenditures Operations 0 0 0 0 0.00% Total expenditures 0 0 0 0 0.00% Revenues over(under)expenditures 0 0 0 0 Beginning fund balance 5,500,000 5,500,000 Ending fund balance 5,500,000 5,500,000 #122-WINTER WEATHER RESERVE FUND Revenues Investment Interest 5,400 5 1,128 (4,272) 20.89% Transfers in-#001 0 0 0 0 0.00% Grant Proceeds-Windstorm Cleanup 0 0 0 0 0.00% Subtotal revenues 5,400 5 1,128 (4,272) 20.89% Expenditures Snow removal expenses 500,000 0 0 500,000 0.00% Transfers out-#101 0 0 0 0 0.00% Total expenditures 500,000 0 0 500,000 0.00% Revenues over(under)expenditures (494,600) 5 1,128 (504,272) Beginning fund balance 23,336 23,336 Ending fund balance (471,264) 24,463 Page 10 P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2020\2020 07 31 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA Budget Year 2020 Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures Elapsed= 58.33% For the Seven-Month Period Ended July 31,2020 2020 Actual Actual through Budget %of Budget July July 31 Remaining Budget DEBT SERVICE FUNDS #204-DEBT SERVICE FUND Revenues Spokane Public Facilities District 459,500 0 84,750 (374,750) 18.44% Transfers in-#001 401,450 33,454 234,179 (167,271) 58.33% Transfers in-#301 80,375 6,698 46,885 (33,490) 58.33% Transfers in-#302 80,375 6,698 46,885 (33,490) 58.33% Total revenues 1,021,700 46,850 412,700 (609,000) 40.39% Expenditures Debt Service Payments-CenterPlace 459,500 0 84,750 374,750 18.44% Debt Service Payments-Roads 160,750 0 10,375 150,375 6.45% Debt Service Payments-'16 LTGO Bond 401,450 0 118,225 283,225 29.45% Total expenditures 1,021,700 0 213,350 808,350 20.88% Revenues over(under)expenditures 0 46,850 199,350 (1,417,350) Beginning fund balance 0 0 Ending fund balance 0 199,350 Page 11 P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2020\2020 07 31 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA Budget Year 2020 Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures Elapsed= 58.33% For the Seven-Month Period Ended July 31,2020 2020 Actual Actual through Budget %of Budget July July 31 Remaining Budget CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS #301 -CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND Revenues REET 1 -Taxes 1,000,000 128,702 673,974 (326,026) 67.40% Investment Interest 35,000 712 11,942 (23,058) 34.12% Total revenues 1,035,000 129,414 685,917 (349,083) 66.27% Expenditures Transfers out-#204 80,375 6,698 46,885 33,490 58.33% Transfers out-#303 1,089,148 0 109,287 979,861 10.03% Transfers out-#311 (pavement preservation) 772,639 0 0 772,639 0.00% Transfers out-#314 49,041 0 128,133 (79,092) 261.28% Total expenditures 1,991,203 6,698 284,306 1,706,897 14.28% Revenues over(under)expenditures (956,203) 122,716 401,610 (2,055,980) Beginning fund balance 2,798,194 2,798,194 Ending fund balance 1,841,991 3,199,804 #302-SPECIAL CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND Revenues REET 2-Taxes 1,000,000 128,702 673,974 (326,026) 67.40% Investment Interest 35,000 1,106 18,167 (16,833) 51.90% Total revenues 1,035,000 129,808 692,141 (342,859) 66.87% Expenditures Transfers out-#204 80,375 6,698 46,885 33,490 58.33% Transfers out-#303 404,318 0 63,214 341,104 15.63% Transfers out-#311 (pavement preservation) 772,638 0 0 772,638 0.00% Total expenditures 1,257,331 6,698 110,099 1,147,232 8.76% Revenues over(under)expenditures (222,331) 123,110 582,042 (1,490,091) Beginning fund balance 4,391,870 4,391,870 Ending fund balance 4,169,539 4,973,912 Page 12 P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2020\2020 07 31 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA Budget Year 2020 Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures Elapsed= 58.33% For the Seven-Month Period Ended July 31,2020 2020 Actual Actual through Budget %of Budget July July 31 Remaining Budget CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS-continued #303 STREET CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND Revenues Developer Contribution 110,499 458,242 462,415 351,916 418.48% Grant Proceeds 6,596,718 296,117 894,670 (5,702,048) 13.56% Transfers in-#301 1,089,148 0 109,287 (979,861) 10.03% Transfers in-#302 404,318 0 63,214 (341,104) 15.63% Transfers in-#312 114,512 0 51,435 (63,077) 44.92% Investment Interest 0 0 0 0 0.00% Total revenues 8,315,195 754,359 1,581,021 (6,734,174) 19.01% Expenditures 205 Sprague/Barker Intersection Improvement 195,499 6,853 66,547 128,952 34.04% 249 Sullivan&Wellesley Intersection 100,000 3,745 50,499 49,501 50.50% 259 North Sullivan ITS Project 810,232 190,655 518,583 291,649 64.00% 267 Mission SW-Bowdish to Union 19,852 0 134 19,718 0.67% 273 Barker/I-90 Interchange 90,000 4,756 76,884 13,116 85.43% 275 Barker Rd Widening-River to Euclid 3,729,143 20,092 207,012 3,522,131 5.55% 276 Barker Rd Widening-Euclid to Trent 0 0 29,797 (29,797) 0.00% 285 Indiana Ave Pres-Evergreen to Sullivan 300,000 63,217 234,374 65,626 78.12% 291 Adams Sidewalk Infill Project 444,645 108,178 275,241 169,404 61.90% 292 Mullen Preservation: Broadway-Mission 0 0 4,822 (4,822) 0.00% 293 2018 CSS Citywide Reflective Signal BP 99,000 409 1,513 97,487 1.53% 294 Citywide Reflective Post Panels 47,775 201 19,565 28,210 40.95% 295 Garland Avenue Extension 150,000 11,491 939,070 (789,070) 626.05% 299 Argonne Rd Concrete Pvmt Indiana to Mont 32,000 11,406 39,452 (7,452) 123.29% 300 Pines&Mission Intersection Improvements 516,000 3,459 34,572 481,428 6.70% 301 Park&Mission Intersection Improvements 0 4,395 24,981 (24,981) 0.00% 302 Ella Sidewalk: Broadway to Alki 371,760 47,464 315,597 56,163 84.89% 303 S.Conklin Road Sidewalk 124,125 51,281 104,899 19,226 84.51% 310 Sullivan Rd Overcrossing UP RR Deck Rep. 0 3,149 5,187 (5,187) 0.00% 313 Barker Road/Union Pacific Crossing 0 5,029 20,886 (20,886) 0.00% 318 Wilbur Sidewalk: Boone to Mission 0 1,716 2,499 (2,499) 0.00% Contingency 1,000,000 0 0 1,000,000 0.00% Total expenditures 8,030,031 537,494 2,972,115 5,057,916 37.01% Revenues over(under)expenditures 285,164 216,865 (1,391,093) (11,792,090) Beginning fund balance 67,402 67,402 Ending fund balance 352,566 (1,323,691) Note: Work performed in the Street Capital Projects Fund for preservation projects is for items such as sidewalk upgrades that were bid with the pavement preservation work. Page 13 P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2020\2020 07 31 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA Budget Year 2020 Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures Elapsed= 58.33% For the Seven-Month Period Ended July 31,2020 2020 Actual Actual through Budget %of Budget July July 31 Remaining Budget CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS-continued #309-PARKS CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND Revenues Grant Proceeds 2,500 0 1,070,942 1,068,442 42837.67% Transfers in-#001 1,660,000 13,333 93,333 (1,566,667) 5.62% Transfers in-#312 7,500 0 219,123 211,623 2921.64% Investment Interest 0 0 0 0 0.00% Miscellaneous Revenues 0 0 (0) (0) 0.00% Total revenues 1,670,000 13,333 1,383,398 (286,602) 82.84% Expenditures 268 Appleway Trail-Evergreen to Sullivan 5,000 11,243 1,121,150 (1,116,150) 22423.01% 296 Browns Park 2019 Construction Improvements 5,000 4,920 (53,378) 58,378 -1067.57% 304 CenterPlace West Lawn Phase 2 1,500,000 224,795 1,099,254 400,746 73.28% 305 CenterPlace Roof Repair 0 11,432 42,304 (42,304) 0.00% 314 Balfour Park Frontage Improvements 0 2,164 3,214 (3,214) 0.00% 315 Brown's Park 2020 Improvements 0 3,079 6,210 (6,210) 0.00% 316 Balfour Park Improvements-Phase 1 0 0 10,947 (10,947) 0.00% Total expenditures 1,510,000 257,633 2,229,700 (719,700) 147.66% Revenues over(under)expenditures 160,000 (244,300) (846,302) 433,098 Beginning fund balance 78,627 78,627 Ending fund balance 238,627 (767,675) #310-CIVIC FACILITIES CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND Revenues Investment Interest 17,000 191 3,005 (13,995) 17.67% Total revenues 17,000 191 3,005 (13,995) 17.67% Expenditures Transfers out 0 0 0 0 0.00% Total expenditures 0 0 0 0 0.00% Revenues over(under)expenditures 17,000 191 3,005 (13,995) Beginning fund balance 855,985 855,985 Ending fund balance 872,985 858,990 Note: The fund balance includes$839,285.10 paid by the Library District for 2.82 acres at the Balfour Park site. If the District does not succeed in getting a voted bond approved by October 2017 then the City may repurchase this land at the original sale price of$839,285.10. Page 14 P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2020\2020 07 31 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA Budget Year 2020 Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures Elapsed= 58.33% For the Seven-Month Period Ended July 31,2020 2020 Actual Actual through Budget %of Budget July July 31 Remaining Budget CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS-continued #311 -PAVEMENT PRESERVATION FUND Revenues Transfers in-#001 982,023 81,835 572,847 (409,176) 58.33% Transfers in-#106 1,500,000 0 0 (1,500,000) 0.00% Transfers in-#301 772,639 0 0 (772,639) 0.00% Transfers in-#302 772,638 0 0 (772,638) 0.00% Grant Proceeds 10,588 0 84,251 73,663 795.72% Developer Contribution 0 0 0 0 0.00% Investment Interest 0 781 8,389 8,389 0.00% Total revenues 4,037,888 82,616 665,487 (3,372,401) 16.48% Expenditures Pre-Project GeoTech Services 50,000 0 0 50,000 0.00% Pavement Preservation 4,217,523 0 0 4,217,523 0.00% 248 Sprague Street Pres-Sullivan to Corbin 0 0 (167) 167 0.00% 267 Mission SW-Bowdish to Union 0 0 470 (470) 0.00% 269 Evergreen-Mission Connector to Indiana 0 20 257 (257) 0.00% 284 Argonne Rd. Pres-Valleyway to Broadway 0 0 40 (40) 0.00% 285 Indiana Ave Pres-Evergreen to Sullivan 0 513,095 1,432,767 (1,432,767) 0.00% 287 University Pres-Dishman Mica to 16th 0 0 7,500 (7,500) 0.00% 290 2019 Local Access Streets(Midilome) 0 0 7,500 (7,500) 0.00% 292 Mullen Preservation: Broadway-Mission 0 1,815 3,729 (3,729) 0.00% 297 2019 SCWD#3 Street Preservation 0 0 (3,199) 3,199 0.00% 309 Local Access Streets: Barker Homes 0 1,550 32,671 (32,671) 0.00% Total expenditures 4,267,523 516,480 1,481,570 2,785,953 34.72% Revenues over(under)expenditures (229,635) (433,864) (816,083) (6,158,354) Beginning fund balance 4,425,201 4,425,201 Ending fund balance 4,195,566 3,609,118 #312-CAPITAL RESERVE FUND Revenues Transfers in-#001 0 0 0 0 0.00% Transfers in-#310 0 0 0 0 0.00% Investment Interest 100,000 2,672 49,434 (50,566) 49.43% Total revenues 100,000 2,672 49,434 (50,566) 49.43% Expenditures Transfers out-#101 1,364,706 113,726 796,079 568,628 58.33% Transfers out-#303 114,512 0 51,435 63,077 44.92% Transfers out-#309 7,500 0 219,123 (211,623) 2921.64% Transfers out-#314 64,192 0 61 64,131 0.09% Land Acquisitions 0 0 4,110 (4,110) 0.00% Total expenditures 1,550,910 113,726 1,070,807 480,103 69.04% Revenues over(under)expenditures (1,450,910) (111,054) (1,021,373) (530,669) Beginning fund balance 12,936,816 12,936,816 Ending fund balance 11,485,906 11,915,444 Page 15 P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2020\2020 07 31 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA Budget Year 2020 Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures Elapsed= 58.33% For the Seven-Month Period Ended July 31,2020 2020 Actual Actual through Budget %of Budget July July 31 Remaining Budget CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS-continued #313-CITY HALL CONSTRUCTION FUND Revenues Investment Interest 0 0 0 0 0.00% Total revenues 0 0 0 0 0.00% Expenditures Transfers out-#312 0 0 0 0 0.00% Total expenditures 0 0 0 0 0.00% Revenues over(under)expenditures 0 0 0 0 Beginning fund balance 0 0 Ending fund balance 0 0 #314-RAILROAD GRADE SEPARATION PROJECTS FUND Revenues Grant Proceeds 12,808,751 5,181 1,633,178 (11,175,574) 12.75% Investment Interest 0 37 300 300 0.00% Transfers in-#301 49,041 0 128,133 79,092 261.28% Transfers in-#312 64,192 0 61 (64,131) 0.09% Total revenues 12,921,984 5,218 1,761,672 (11,160,312) 13.63% Expenditures 143 Barker Rd/BNSF Grade Separation 11,475,292 312,825 1,948,347 9,526,945 16.98% 223 Pines Rd Underpass 1,562,500 390,445 446,217 1,116,283 28.56% 311 Sullivan Rd./SR 290 Interchange Project 0 4,354 5,689 (5,689) 0.00% Total expenditures 13,037,792 707,624 2,400,252 10,637,540 18.41% Revenues over(under)expenditures (115,808) (702,406) (638,580) (21,797,852) Beginning fund balance 1,008,638 1,008,638 Ending fund balance 892,830 370,058 Page 16 P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2020\2020 07 31 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA Budget Year 2020 Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures Elapsed= 58.33% For the Seven-Month Period Ended July 31,2020 2020 Actual Actual through Budget %of Budget July July 31 Remaining Budget ENTERPRISE FUNDS #402-STORMWATER FUND RECURRING ACTIVITY Revenues Stormwater Management Fees 1,900,000 181,641 1,109,466 (790,534) 58.39% Investment Interest 40,000 588 8,358 (31,642) 20.89% Total Recurring Revenues 1,940,000 182,229 1,117,824 (822,176) 57.62% Expenditures Wages/Benefits/Payroll Taxes 519,582 34,386 237,435 282,147 45.70% Supplies 14,750 1,044 35,684 (20,934) 241.93% Services&Charges 1,298,153 114,428 450,494 847,659 34.70% Intergovernmental Payments 37,500 0 19,536 17,964 52.10% Vehicle Rentals-#501 14,000 1,167 8,167 5,833 58.33% Total Recurring Expenditures 1,883,985 151,025 751,316 1,132,669 39.88% Recurring Revenues Over(Under) Recurring Expenditures 56,015 31,203 366,507 310,492 NONRECURRING ACTIVITY Revenues Grant Proceeds 59,828 0 304 (59,524) 0.51% Total Nonrecurring Revenues 59,828 0 304 (59,524) 0.51% Expenditures Capital-various projects 500,000 0 9,285 490,715 1.86% 285 Indiana Ave Pres-Evergreen to Sullivan 0 0 18,087 (18,087) 0.00% 302 Ella Sidewalk: Broadway to Alki 0 29,476 60,570 (60,570) 0.00% 303 S.Conklin Road Sidewalk 0 14,028 29,009 (29,009) 0.00% 309 Local Access Streets: Barker Homes 0 0 1,585 (1,585) 0.00% Watershed Studies 80,000 4,171 33,470 46,530 41.84% Stormwater Comprehensive Plan 100,000 0 0 100,000 0.00% Total Nonrecurring Expenditures 680,000 47,674 152,006 527,994 22.35% Nonrecurring Revenues Over(Under) Nonrecurring Expenditures (620,172) (47,674) (151,703) 468,469 Excess(Deficit)of Total Revenues Over(Under)Total Expenditures (564,157) (16,470) 214,805 778,962 Beginning working capital 2,180,773 2,180,773 Ending working capital 1,616,616 2,395,578 Note: Work performed in the Stormwater Fund for preservation projects is for storm water improvements that were bid with the pavement preservation work. #403-AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA Revenues Spokane County 460,000 0 203,098 (256,902) 44.15% Grant Proceeds 349,000 0 0 (349,000) 0.00% Investment Interest 20,000 479 7,427 (12,573) 37.13% Total revenues 829,000 479 210,525 (618,475) 25.40% Expenditures Capital-various projects 500,000 41,630 173,229 326,771 34.65% Total expenditures 500,000 41,630 173,229 326,771 34.65% Revenues over(under)expenditures 329,000 (41,150) 37,297 (945,246) Beginning working capital 2,118,299 2,118,299 Ending working capital 2,447,299 2,155,596 Page 17 P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2020\2020 07 31 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA Budget Year 2020 Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures Elapsed= 58.33% For the Seven-Month Period Ended July 31,2020 2020 Actual Actual through Budget %of Budget July July 31 Remaining Budget INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS _ #501 -ER&R FUND Revenues Interfund vehicle lease-#001 28,000 2,333 16,333 (11,667) 58.33% Interfund vehicle lease-#101 14,500 1,208 8,458 (6,042) 58.33% Interfund vehicle lease-#101 (plow replace) 48,500 4,042 28,292 (20,208) 58.33% Interfund vehicle lease-#402 14,000 1,167 8,167 (5,833) 58.33% Transfers in-#001 (CenterPlace kitchen reserve) 36,600 3,050 21,350 (15,250) 58.33% Transfers in-#001 (Code Enforcement Vehicle) 30,000 0 0 (30,000) 0.00% Investment Interest 19,000 314 4,973 (14,027) 26.17% Total revenues 190,600 12,114 87,573 (103,027) 45.95% Expenditures Wages/Benefits/Payroll Taxes 0 3,994 8,018 (8,018) 0.00% Small tools&minor equipment 20,000 0 0 20,000 0.00% Vehicle purchase 30,000 27,231 27,231 2,769 90.77% Snow plow purchase 235,000 0 125,590 109,410 53.44% Total expenditures 285,000 31,225 160,839 124,161 56.43% Revenues over(under)expenditures (94,400) (19,111) (73,266) (227,188) Beginning working capital 1,496,093 1,496,093 Ending working capital 1,401,693 1,422,827 #502-RISK MANAGEMENT FUND Revenues Investment Interest 0 31 67 67 0.00% Transfers in-#001 410,000 34,167 239,167 (170,833) 58.33% Total revenues 410,000 34,197 239,234 (170,766) 58.35% Expenditures Auto&Property Insurance 410,000 0 337,987 72,013 82.44% Unemployment Claims 0 0 4,529 (4,529) 0.00% Total expenditures 410,000 0 342,516 67,484 83.54% Revenues over(under)expenditures 0 34,197 (103,282) (238,251) Beginning working capital 276,004 276,004 Ending working capital 276,004 172,721 SUMMARY FOR ALL FUNDS Total of Revenues for all Funds 90,026,301 5,993,946 36,428,510 Per Revenue Status Report 90,026,301 5,993,946 36,428,510 Difference - - - Total of Expenditures for all Funds 89,713,567 5,666,744 37,188,617 Per Expenditure Status Report 89,713,567 5,666,744 37,188,617 Total Capital expenditures(included in total expenditures) 28,000,346 2,104,365 9,546,813 Page 18 P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2020\2020 07 31 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 8/14/2020 Investment Report For the Seven-Month Period Ended July 31,2020 NW Bank UMPQUA Total LGIP" CD#2068 CD#0689 Investments Beginning $ 66,987,403.27 $ 3,033,287.68 $ 2,101,932.42 $ 72,122,623.37 Deposits 3,095,726.85 0.00 0.00 3,095,726.85 Withdrawls (1,200,000.00) 0.00 0.00 (1,200,000.00) Interest 17,686.16 42,270.00 0.00 59,956.16 Ending $ 68,900,816.28 $ 3,075,557.68 $ 2,101,932.42 $ 74,078,306.38 matures: 7/23/2021 11/15/2020 rate: 0.40% 1.75% Earnings Balance Current Period Year to date Budget 001 General Fund $ 36,665,001.75 $ 51,764.35 184,482.33 $ 700,000.00 101 Street Fund 684,007.63 175.58 522.86 17,000.00 103 Trails&Paths 15,356.24 3.94 55.13 400.00 104 Tourism Facilities Hotel/Motel 2,432,295.21 624.35 9,626.38 24,000.00 105 Hotel/Motel 558,078.13 143.25 2,101.84 6,000.00 106 Solid Waste Fund 1,122,168.69 288.05 6,403.85 12,000.00 107 PEG Fund 127,173.98 32.64 473.25 0.00 108 Affordable&Supportive Housing 26,508.27 6.80 10.19 0.00 120 CenterPlace Operating Reserve 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 121 Service Level Stabilization Reserve 5,500,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 122 Winter Weather Reserve 21,168.42 5.43 1,127.89 5,400.00 301 Capital Projects 2,774,609.34 712.21 11,942.27 35,000.00 302 Special Capital Projects 4,309,757.21 1,106.27 18,166.59 35,000.00 303 Street Capital Projects Fund 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 309 Parks Capital Project 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 310 Civic Buildings Capital Projects 743,289.96 190.80 3,004.61 17,000.00 311 Pavement Preservation 3,043,103.40 781.13 8,389.16 0.00 312 Capital Reserve Fund 10,408,926.68 2,671.87 49,434.38 100,000.00 313 City Hall Construction Fund 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 314 Railroad Grade Separation Projects 144,686.24 37.14 300.36 0.00 402 Stormwater Management 2,291,417.32 588.18 8,357.99 40,000.00 403 Aquifer Protection Fund 1,866,690.16 479.16 7,426.98 20,000.00 501 Equipment Rental &Replacement 1,224,175.27 314.23 4,972.85 19,000.00 502 Risk Management 119,892.48 30.78 66.88 0.00 $ 74,078,306.38 $ 59,956.16 $ 316,865.79 $ 1,030,800.00 "Local Government Investment Pool Page 19 P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2020\2020 07 31 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 8/14/2020 Sales Tax Receipts For the Seven-Month Period Ended July 31,2020 Month Difference Received 2019 2020 $ February 2,530,639.23 2,559,296.59 28,657.36 1.13% March 1,861,849.29 2,015,206.15 153,356.86 8.24% April 1,758,550.64 1,897,614.47 139,063.83 7.91% May 2,208,350.09 1,847,551.89 (360,798.20) (16.34%) June 2,200,987.91 1,875,335.44 (325,652.47) (14.80%) July 2,333,320.72 2,570,769.98 237,449.26 10.18% 12,893,697.88 12,765,774.52 (127,923.36) (0.99%) August 2,530,196.67 September 2,405,945.26 October 2,504,583.31 November 2,422,514.22 December 2,341,644.57 January 2,284,009.79 27,382,591.70 12,765,774.52 Sales tax receipts reported here reflect remittances for general sales tax, criminal justice sales tax and public safety tax. The sales tax rate for retail sales transacted within the boundaries of the City of Spokane Valley is 8.9%. The tax that is paid by a purchaser at the point of sale is remitted by the vendor to the Washington State Department of Revenue who then remits the taxes back to the various agencies that have imposed the tax. The allocation of the total 8.9%tax rate to the agencies is as follows: - State of Washington 6.50% - City of Spokane Valley 0.85% - Spokane County 0.15% - Spokane Public Facilities District 0.10% * - Criminal Justice 0.10% - Public Safety 0.10% * 2.40% local tax - Juvenile Jail 0.10% * - Mental Health 0.10% * - Law Enforcement Communications 0.10% * - Spokane Transit Authority 0.80% * 8.90% * Indicates voter approved sales taxes In addition to the .85% reported above that the City receives, we also receive a portion of the Criminal Justice and Public Safety sales taxes. The distribution of those taxes is computed as follows: Criminal Justice: The tax is assessed county-wide and of the total collected, the State distributes 10%of the receipts to Spokane County, with the remainder allocated on a per capita basis to the County and the cities within the County. Public Safety: The tax is assessed county-wide and of the total collected, the State distributes 60%of the receipts to Spokane County, with the remainder allocated on a per capita basis to the cities within the County. Page 20 P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Tax Revenue\Sales Tax\2020\sales tax collections 2020 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA \ 8/6/2020 Sales Tax Collections- For the years 2011 through 2020 2019 to 2020 Difference 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 1 $ % January 1,460,548 1,589,887 1,671,269 1,677,887 1,732,299 1,863,225 1,992,273 2,078,412 2,240,908 2,253,852 12,944 0.58% February 990,157 1,009,389 1,133,347 1,170,640 1,197,323 1,316,682 1,369,740 1,536,252 1,648,657 1,776,898 128,241 7.78% March 1,015,762 1,067,733 1,148,486 1,201,991 1,235,252 1,378,300 1,389,644 1,564,282 1,549,275 1,687,355 138,080 8.91% April 1,284,180 1,277,621 1,358,834 1,448,539 1,462,096 1,640,913 1,737,933 1,926,551 1,955,470 1,627,596 (327,874) (16.77%) May 1,187,737 1,174,962 1,320,449 1,400,956 1,373,710 1,566,178 1,564,119 1,762,119 1,946,112 1,651,937 (294,175) (15.12%) June 1,248,218 1,290,976 1,389,802 1,462,558 1,693,461 1,641,642 1,751,936 1,871,077 2,067,987 2,291,842 223,855 10.82% Collected to date 7,186,602 7,410,568 8,022,187 8,362,571 8,694,141 9,406,940 9,805,645 10,738,693 11,408,409 11,289,480 (118,929) (1.04%) July 1,332,834 1,302,706 1,424,243 1,545,052 1,718,428 1,776,653 1,935,028 2,053,961 2,232,342 0 August 1,279,500 1,299,678 1,465,563 1,575,371 1,684,700 1,746,371 1,877,899 1,980,940 2,121,051 0 September 1,294,403 1,383,123 1,466,148 1,552,736 1,563,950 1,816,923 1,946,689 2,019,198 2,223,576 0 October 1,291,217 1,358,533 1,439,321 1,594,503 1,618,821 1,822,998 1,898,067 2,005,836 2,134,985 0 November 1,217,933 1,349,580 1,362,021 1,426,254 1,487,624 1,652,181 1,768,817 1,925,817 2,064,504 0 December 1,247,920 1,323,189 1,408,134 1,383,596 1,441,904 1,664,983 1,856,989 1,918,411 2,019,895 0 Total Collections 14,850,409 15,427,377 16,587,617 17,440,083 18,209,568 19,887,049 21,089,134 22,642,856 24,204,762 11,289,480 Budget Estimate 14,210,000 14,210,000 15,250,000 16,990,000 17,628,400 18,480,500 19,852,100 20,881,900 22,917,000 24,632,900 Actual over(under)budg 640,409 1,217,377 1,337,617 450,083 581,168 1,406,549 1,237,034 1,760,956 1,287,762 (13,343,420) Total actual collections as a%of total budget 104.51% 108.57% 108.77% 102.65% 103.30% 107.61% 106.23% 108.43% 105.62% n/a %change in annual total collected 5.34% 3.89% 7.52% 5.14% 4.41% 9.21% 6.04% 7.37% 6.90% n/a %of budget collected through June 50.57% 52.15% 52.60% 49.22% 49.32% 50.90% 49.39% 51.43% 49.78% 45.83% %of actual total collected through June 48.39% 48.04% 48.36% 47.95% 47.74% 47.30% 46.50% 47.43% 47.13% n/a Chart Reflecting History of Collections through the Month of June June 12,000,000 10,000,000 ■June 8,000,000 ■May 6,000,000 ■April ■■March February 4,000,000 2,000,000 ■January 0 IiiiiliiiiIERm 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Page 21 P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Tax Revenue\Lodging Tax\2020\105 hotel motel tax 2020 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 8/6/2020 Hotel/Motel Tax Receipts through- June Actual for the years 2011 through 202 pri 0 tMll'00 !`d 2019 to 2020 Difference 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 $ % January 22,212 21,442 24,185 25,425 27,092 31,887 27,210 28,752 31,865 36,203 4,338 13.61% February 22,792 21,549 25,975 26,014 27,111 27,773 26,795 28,878 32,821 31,035 (1,786) (5.44%) March 24,611 25,655 27,739 29,384 32,998 34,330 31,601 31,906 40,076 37,395 (2,681) (6.69%) April 38,230 52,130 40,979 48,246 50,455 52,551 52,242 57,664 59,117 24,959 (34,158) (57.78%) May 33,791 37,478 40,560 41,123 44,283 50,230 50,112 51,777 53,596 16,906 (36,690) (68.46%) June 41,403 43,971 47,850 52,618 56,975 55,060 60,637 62,048 73,721 28,910 (44,811) (60.78%) Total Collections 183,040 202,225 207,288 222,809 238,914 251,831 248,597 261,025 291,196 175,408 (115,788) (39.76%) July 49,312 52,819 56,157 61,514 61,809 65,007 69,337 71,865 84,628 0 August 57,452 57,229 63,816 70,384 72,697 73,700 76,972 79,368 91,637 0 September 58,908 64,299 70,794 76,100 74,051 70,305 80,173 79,661 97,531 0 October 39,028 43,699 43,836 45,604 49,880 55,660 56,631 61,826 77,932 0 November 37,339 39,301 42,542 39,600 42,376 46,393 47,090 52,868 59,252 0 December 32,523 30,432 34,238 33,256 41,510 33,478 37,180 40,363 41,675 0 Total Collections 457,603 490,004 518,672 549,267 581,237 596,374 615,980 646,976 743,851 175,408 Budget Estimate 480,000 430,000 490,000 530,000 550,000 580,000 580,000 580,000 600,000 650,000 Actual over(under)budg (22,397) 60,004 28,672 19,267 31,237 16,374 35,980 66,976 143,851 (474,592) Total actual collections as a%of total budget 95.33% 113.95% 105.85% 103.64% 105.68% 102.82% 106.20% 111.55% 123.98% n/a %change in annual total collected 2.02% 7.08% 5.85% 5.90% 5.82% 2.60% 3.29% 5.03% 14.97% n/a %of budget collected through June 38.13% 47.03% 42.30% 42.04% 43.44% 43.42% 42.86% 45.00% 48.53% 26.99% %of actual total collected through June 40.00% 41.27% 39.97% 40.56% 41.10% 42.23% 40.36% 40.35% 39.15% n/a Chart Reflecting History of Collections through the Month of June June 350,000 300,000 250,000 •June 200,000 ■May ■April 150,000 ■March 100,000 ■February ■January 50,000 0 , 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Page 22 P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Tax Revenue\REET\2020\301 and 302 REET for 2020 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 8/26/2020 1st and 2nd 1/4% REET Collections through June Actual for the years 2011 through 2020 2019 to 2020 Difference 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 $ % January 64,128 46,359 56,898 61,192 96,141 104,446 153,661 239,437 120,809 212,512 91,703 75.91% February 36,443 56,115 155,226 67,049 103,508 83,583 124,514 146,892 199,209 242,927 43,718 21.95% March 95,880 71,730 72,172 81,724 165,868 220,637 282,724 310,562 193,913 203,774 9,861 5.09% April 79,681 86,537 90,377 105,448 236,521 205,654 169,060 218,842 347,528 197,928 (149,600) (43.05%) May 124,692 111,627 116,165 198,870 165,748 192,806 202,734 646,397 263,171 258,784 (4,387) (1.67%) June 81,579 124,976 139,112 106,676 347,421 284,897 248,768 277,424 465,044 329,801 (135,243) (29.08%) Collected to date 482,404 497,344 629,950 620,957 1,115,207 1,092,025 1,181,461 1,839,554 1,589,674 1,445,726 (143,948) (9.06%) July 79,629 101,049 128,921 208,199 217,375 248,899 449,654 302,941 327,636 0 August 129,472 106,517 117,150 172,536 202,525 231,200 472,420 261,626 300,312 0 September 68,020 63,517 174,070 152,323 179,849 178,046 187,348 259,492 335,824 0 October 61,396 238,095 117,806 123,505 128,833 253,038 207,895 584,792 225,216 0 November 74,753 104,886 78,324 172,227 129,870 186,434 229,800 263,115 319,161 0 December 65,077 74,300 75,429 117,682 157,919 164,180 278,995 288,912 235,726 0 Total distributed by Spokane County 960,751 1,185,707 1,321,650 1,567,429 2,131,578 2,353,822 3,007,573 3,800,432 3,333,549 1,445,726 Budget estimate 780,000 875,000 975,000 1,100,000 1,400,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 3,000,000 2,800,000 2,000,000 Actual over(under)budget 180,751 310,707 346,650 467,429 731,578 353,822 1,007,573 800,432 533,549 (554,274) Total actual collections as a%of total budget 123.17% 135.51% 135.55% 142.49% 152.26% 117.69% 150.38% 126.68% 119.06% n/a %change in annual total collected (0.16%) 23.41% 11.47% 18.60% 35.99% 10.43% 27.77% 26.36% (12.28%) n/a %of budget collected through June 61.85% 56.84% 64.61% 56.45% 79.66% 54.60% 59.07% 61.32% 56.77% 72.29% %of actual total collected through June 50.21% 41.94% 47.66% 39.62% 52.32% 46.39% 39.28% 48.40% 47.69% n/a Chart Reflecting History of Collections through the Month of June June 2,000,000 1,800,000 1,600,000 - 1,400,000 - ■June 1,200,000 •May 1,000,000 •April 800,000 •March 600,000 •February 400,000 •January 200,000 0 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Page 23 P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Debt Capacity\2020\debt capacity 2020 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 4/1/2020 Debt Capacity 2019 Assessed Value for 2020 Property Taxes 10,200,357,539 Maximum Outstanding Remaining Debt as of Debt ok Capacity 12/31/2018 Capacity Utilized Voted(UTGO) 1.00%of assessed value 102,003,575 0 102,003,575 0.00% Nonvoted(LTGO) 1.50%of assessed value 153,005,363 11,715,000 141,290,363 7.66% Voted park 2.50%of assessed value 255,008,938 0 255,008,938 0.00% Voted utility 2.50%of assessed value 255,008,938 0 255,008,938 0.00% 765,026,814 11,715,000 753,311,814 1.53% 2014 LTGO Bonds Road& LTGO Bonds Period Street 2016 LTGO Grand Ending CenterPlace Improvements Total Bonds Total 12/1/2014 225,000 135,000 360,00 0 360,000 Bonds 12/1/2015 175,000 125,000 300,00 0 300,000 Repaid 12/1/2016 185,000 130,000 315,000 75,000 390,000 12/1/2017 190,000 130,000 320,000 150,000 470,000 L12/1/2018 230,000 135,000 365,000 155,000 520,000 12/1/2019 255,000 140,000 395,000 160,000 555,000 1,260,000 795,000 2,055,000 540,000 2,595,000 12/1/2020 290,000 140,000 430,000 165,000 595,000 12/1/2021 320,000 145,000 465,000 170,000 635,000 12/1/2022 350,000 150,000 500,000 175,000 675,000 12/1/2023 390,000 155,000 545,000 180,000 725,000 12/1/2024 430,000 0 430,000 185,000 615,000 12/1/2025 465,000 0 465,000 195,000 660,000 12/1/2026 505,000 0 505,000 900,000 705,000 12/1/2027 395,000 0 395,000 "05,000 600,000 12/1/2028 300,000 0 300,000 15,000 515,000 12/1/2029 245,000 0 245,000 2'0,000 465,000 12/1/2030 225,000 0 225,000 2. ,000 450,000 Bonds 12/1/2031 180,000 0 180,000 23.,000 415,000 Remaining 12/1/2032 130,000 0 130,000 246,000 370,000 12/1/2033 165,000 0 165,000 250,000 415,000 12/1/2034 0 0 0 260,100 260,000 12/1/2035 0 0 0 270,600 270,000 12/1/2036 0 0 0 280,010 280,000 12/1/2037 0 0 0 290,060 290,000 12/1/2038 0 0 0 305,00' 305,000 12/1/2039 0 0 0 315,001 315,000 12/1/2040 0 0 0 330,000 330,000 12/1/2041 0 0 0 340,000 340,000 12/1/2042 0 0 0 355,000 355,000 12/1/2043 0 0 0 365,000 365,000 12/1/2044 0 0 0 375,000 375,000 12/1/2045 0 0 0 390,000 390,000 4,390,000 590,000 4,980,000 6,735,000 11,715,000 5,650,000 1,385,000 7,035,000 7,275,000 14,310,000 Page 24 P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Tax Revenue\MVFT\2020\motor vehicle fuel tax collections 2020 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 8/6/2020 Motor Fuel(Gas)Tax Collections- ,Ss.. For the years 2011 through 2020 1. V. 2019 to 2020 Difference 2011 2012 2013 I 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 $ % January 154,792 159,607 146,145 152,906 152,598 163,918 150,654 162,359 148,530 152,686 4,156 2.80% February 146,353 135,208 145,998 148,118 145,455 163,037 164,807 175,936 181,823 170,461 (11,362) (6.25%) March 141,849 144,297 135,695 131,247 140,999 145,537 138,205 139,826 131,009 146,280 15,271 11.66% April 165,019 153,546 156,529 156,269 157,994 167,304 168,000 168,796 144,080 90,589 (53,491) (37.13%) May 154,700 144,670 151,595 156,850 156,259 171,829 174,211 193,986 185,669 130,168 (55,501) (29.89%) June 158,351 159,827 167,479 161,965 164,872 157,737 174,838 144,308 175,985 128,359 (47,626) (27.06%) Collected to date 921,064 897,155 903,441 907,355 918,177 969,362 970,715 985,211 967,096 818,543 (148,553) (15.36%) July 165,398 160,565 155,348 157,805 168,205 177,427 177,019 194,267 169,733 0 August 153,361 164,050 173,983 172,308 186,277 177,567 195,780 205,438 195,107 0 September 173,820 171,651 195,397 173,299 174,505 194,640 184,342 180,874 180,605 0 October 158,889 153,022 133,441 160,539 161,520 166,369 163,780 158,062 162,187 0 November 160,461 162,324 164,303 165,871 181,771 176,178 194,814 199,282 196,240 0 December 124,714 138,223 142,140 141,298 153,338 152,787 154,298 148,960 155,728 0 Total Collections 1,857,707 1,846,990 1,868,053 1,878,475 1,943,793 2,014,330 2,040,748 2,072,094 2,026,696 818,543 Budget Estimate 1,875,000 1,905,800 1,868,900 1,866,400 1,867,700 2,013,400 2,048,900 2,061,100 2,039,500 2,055,300 Actual over(under)budg (17,293) (58,810) (847) 12,075 76,093 930 (8,152) 10,994 (12,804) (1,236,757) Total actual collections as a%of total budget 99.08% 96.91% 99.95% 100.65% 104.07% 100.05% 99.60% 100.53% 99.37% n/a %change in annual total collected 98.55% (0.58%) 1.14% 0.56% 3.48% 3.63% 1.31% 1.54% (2.19%) n/a %of budget collected through June 49.12% 47.07% 48.34% 48.62% 49.16% 48.15% 47.38% 47.80% 47.42% 39.83% %of actual total collected through June 49.58% 48.57% 48.36% 48.30% 47.24% 48.12% 47.57% 47.55% 47.72% n/a Chart Reflecting History of Collections through the Month of June June 1,200,000 1,000,000 ■June 800,000 ■May 600,000 ■April 400,000 MM-MM-M ■March •February 200,000 ■January 0 M-M 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Page 25 P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Tax Revenue\Telephone Tax\2020\telephone utility tax collections 2020 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 8/26/2020 Telephone Utility Tax Collections- For the years 2011 through 2020 2019 to 2020 Difference 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 $ % January 241,357 193,818 217,478 210,777 177,948 182,167 162,734 130,196 136,615 123,292 (13,323) (9.75%) February 230,366 261,074 216,552 205,953 212,845 173,971 163,300 164,060 132,538 122,448 (10,090) (7.61%) March 245,539 234,113 223,884 208,206 174,738 177,209 162,536 158,416 138,727 121,938 (16,789) (12.10%) April 238,561 229,565 214,618 206,038 214,431 171,770 157,285 146,519 126,455 120,016 (6,439) (5.09%) May 236,985 227,469 129,270 210,010 187,856 174,512 161,506 149,434 135,704 118,018 (17,686) (13.03%) June 239,013 234,542 293,668 210,289 187,412 170,450 156,023 150,780 129,602 117,895 (11,707) (9.03%) Collected to date 1,431,821 1,380,581 1,295,470 1,251,273 1,155,230 1,050,079 963,384 899,405 799,641 723,607 (76,034) (9.51%) July 244,191 226,118 213,078 205,651 190,984 174,405 157,502 147,281 130,723 0 August 349,669 228,789 211,929 205,645 185,172 171,909 150,644 148,158 127,303 0 September 241,476 227,042 210,602 199,193 183,351 170,476 155,977 141,290 128,018 0 October 237,111 225,735 205,559 183,767 183,739 166,784 153,075 142,925 127,214 0 November 240,246 225,319 212,947 213,454 175,235 166,823 151,208 139,209 125,027 0 December 236,449 221,883 213,097 202,077 183,472 168,832 161,115 140,102 126,226 0 Total Collections 2,980,963 2,735,467 2,562,682 2,461,060 2,257,183 2,069,308 1,892,905 1,758,370 1,564,152 723,607 Budget Estimate 3,000,000 3,000,000 2,900,000 2,750,000 2,565,100 2,340,000 2,000,000 1,900,000 1,600,000 1,521,000 Actual over(under)budg (19,037) (264,533) (337,318) (288,940) (307,917) (270,692) (107,095) (141,630) (35,848) (797,393) Total actual collections as a%of total budget 99.37% 91.18% 88.37% 89.49% 88.00% 88.43% 94.65% 92.55% 97.76% n/a %change in annual total collected (0.17%) (8.24%) (6.32%) (3.97%) (8.28%) (8.32%) (8.52%) (7.11%) (11.05%) n/a %of budget collected through..rt 47.73% 46.02% 44.67% 45.50% 45.04% 44.88% 48.17% 47.34% 49.98% 47.57% %of actual total collected through June 48.03% 50.47% 50.55% 50.84% 51.18% 50.75% 50.89% 51.15% 51.12% n/a Chart Reflecting History of Collections through the Month of June June •June 1,600,000 •May 1,400,000 ■April 1,200,000 ■March 1,000,000 ■February 800,000 I ■January 600,000 400,000 200,000 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Page 26 Davc Ellis Ozzie K ezovicl1 Chief of"Police SherifT o.�iI Spokane Valley Police Department Accredited Since 2011 N all'F`� Services provided in partnership with d,w.co, .2 3 / the Spokane County Sheriff's Office and the Community, 'tea .001111i Dedicated to Your Safety. TO: Mark Calhoun, City Manager FROM: Dave Ellis, Chief of Police DATE: August 19, 2020 RE: Monthly Report July 2020 ADMINISTRATIVE: In early August, Sheriff Knezovich commissioned a new, entry-level deputy. Keifer Smith is 25 years old and is a Spokane native. He graduated from Rogers High School in 2013 and attended EWU. He is married and has two young sons. He has been serving with the US Navy since 2015 and was stationed at NAS Whidbey Island. His hobbies include hunting, fishing and coaching youth football. Keifer will be a member of the Basic Law Enforcement Academy, Class 810, which begins August 25th in Spokane. Asst. Chief Kittilstvedt participated in the Spokane All County Full-Scale Exercise — Mid-Term Planning Meeting in early July along with other command staff from the Sheriff's Office and local senior officers from law enforcement, fire departments, and FEMA. Exercise objectives, design, and development were discussed for the anticipated 10/10/20 event, Unfortunately, due to the location of the event (Mead High School) and the school's focus on students returning to school due to COVID, the exercise has been moved to the Spring of 2021.. Meeting 144 of the COVID-1 0 Re-Opening Planning was held in early July,which Chief Ellis attended. Chief Ellis attended the Safe Streets Task Force quarterly meeting in early July, along with other command staff from the Sheriff's Office. The monthly Spokane Regional Emergency Communications (SREC) Governing Board Meeting was held in mid-July, which Chief Ellis attended. He also attended the Basic Law Enforcement Academy graduation in mid-July, where the Sheriff's Office congratulated trainees on successfully completing the program in Spokane. Page 1 In late July,Chief Ellis and other Sheriffs Office command staff attended an SCSO Strategic Planning Session followed by a briefing from the Joint Terrorism Task Force. Chief Ellis traveled to North Carolina at the end of July to attend a one-day conference titled,Modern LE Firearms Training Range Development Seminar. The information from the seminar was very valuable and will be invaluable to apply to the Sheriff's Office and Spokane Valley PD. SHERIFF'S COMMUNITY ORIENTED POLICING EFFORT (SCOPE): In the month of July, S.C.O.P.E. participated in: • S.C.O.P.E. Basic Training (four new • S.C.O.P.E. Volunteers patrolling volunteers started in July) neighborhoods and businesses • S.C.O.P.E. Volunteers made masks for • S.C.O.P.E.'s SIRT (Sheriff Incident medical employees and first responders Response Team) continues to support SVPD • S.C.O.P.E. Volunteers delivering PPE and Sheriff's Office through these supplies weekly to medical, fire stations, challenging times senior care facilities and others • Attended Valleyfest organizational meetings • S.C.O.P.E. Volunteers helped with some • Radar Speed Awareness Volunteer Patrols Food Bank drop offs working throughout Spokane Valley July 2020 Volunteers Hours per Station *Includes estimated volunteer service hours that are provided in the City of Spokane Valley. These two locations cover both Spokane Valley and the unincorporated portion of the county. Location #Volunteers Admin Hours L.E. Hours Total Hours Central Valley 6 23.5 .5 24 East Valley* 15 173 265 438 Edgecliff 2 12 0 12 Trentwood 5 71 74 145 University 8 161.5 12 173.5 West Valley* 15 355 75 430 TOTALS 51 796 426.5 1,222.5 Volunteer Value ($31.72 per hour) $38,777.70 for July 2020 The SCOPE Latent Fingerprint Team was given 77 cases for the month of July. Out of those 77 cases, 38 were from crimes in Spokane Valley. The team located fingerprints on 15 vehicles; 9 of those were Spokane Valley cases. Great job SCOPE Latent Fingerprint Team! S.C.O.P.E. Incident Response Team (SIRT) volunteers contributed 73 on-scene hours (including travel time) in July,responding to crime scenes,motor vehicle accidents and providing traffic control; 47 hours were for incidents in Spokane Valley. There were no special events in July. Total volunteer hours contributed by SIRT,including training, stand-by,response and special events is 1,452 for July; total for 2020 is 8,288. Page 2 Abandoned Vehicles May 2020 June 2020 July 2020 Tagged for Impounding 15 37 48 Cited/Towed 5 1 0 Hulks Processed 22 13 22 Total Vehicles Processed 72 112 153 Yearly Total of Vehicles Processed 372 484 637 SCOPE DISABLED PARKING ACTIVITY REPORT City of Spokane Valley # of # of Firs. #of # of # of Non- Vol. Disabled Warnings Disabled Infractions Issued Infractions Issued Issued January 4 22.5 2 25 0 February 4 18.5 3 30 0 March 2 6 0 8 0 April 0 0 0 0 0 May 0 0 0 0 0 June 0 0 0 0 0 July 0 0 0 0 0 YTD Total 10 47 5 63 0 Spokane County # of #of Iirs. At of #of # of Non Vol. Disabled Warnings Disabled Infractions Issued Infractions Issued Issued January 2 16.4 4 10 0 February 3 12.5 1 10 0 March 2 9 0 4 0 April 0 0 0 0 0 May 0 0 0 0 0 June 0 0 0 0 0 July 0 0 0 0 0 YTD Total 7 37.9 5 24 0 Page 3 OPERATIONS: Deputies and SVIU Detectives Recover Recently Stolen Vehicle - Suspect's False Claim of being COVID Positive Leads to Her Arrest: Spokane Valley Investigative Unit(SVIU)Detectives and Patrol Deputies collaborated to recover a stolen vehicle occupied by two suspects. During the investigation, the passenger falsely claimed she had just been informed she had tested positive for COVID. After she finally admitted her claim was a lie to avoid going to jail, she was arrested. The driver was also arrested for several charges. In early July, at approximately 8:25 a.m., Spokane Valley SVIU Detectives Eaton and Karnitz responded to the Spokane Valley Library to investigate a possible stolen vehicle. A concerned citizen told them a male was in the parking lot of the library trying to sell a Subaru GL. In the parking lot, they observed a black 1984 Subaru with a front license plate,but no rear plate. Knowing the removal of a rear license plate from a stolen vehicle is a common attempt to avoid detection by thieves, investigators surveilled the possible stolen car. A few minutes later, the Subaru exited the parking lot, and the detectives followed. Patrol Deputy Lawhorn was contacted to conduct a traffic stop for further investigation. Deputy Lawhorn stopped the vehicle at the intersection of Sprague and Skipworth. The 20-year-ole male driver verbally identified himself. A check of his name revealed his driving privileges were suspended. The male suspect was arrested for the misdemeanor charge. The 22-year-old female passenger explained the male had purchased the car earlier that morning "for a few hundred dollars." The female said she didn't know the car was stolen, and the male got a really good deal because the seller owed him money. A few minutes later, the female told another deputy at the scene that she had tested positive for COVID and just received the results earlier in the morning. Spokane Valley Fire and AMR personnel were requested to provide medical treatment and evaluate the female. After her evaluation, where she showed no signs or symptoms,she told Detective Eaton she had never been tested and made up the entire claim because she was tired of answering questions and didn't want to go to jail. She was arrested for making false/misleading statements to law enforcement and obstructing an investigation. Detectives determined the Subaru was indeed stolen, and the registered owner had just called in to report the theft. The male suspect would not admit he stole the vehicle,but he did state he knew it was probably stolen. Both suspects were transported and booked into the Spokane County Jail. The male suspect was charged with Possession of a Stolen Motor Vehicle, Possession of Motor Vehicle Theft Tools (shaved key), and Driving While Suspended 2,d Degree. The female suspect was booked for Making False/Misleading Statements and Obstructing. The vehicle was returned to the registered owner. Victim Stabbed During Family Argument - Spokane Valley Patrol Deputies responded to a family dispute that turned violent, sending the victim to the hospital with an apparent life- threatening stab wound to the chest. The suspect fled the scene, but returned and was arrested. The victim's sister was extremely uncooperative with deputies, even as they tried to provide life-saving medical aid to the victim. She was later arrested after she hit one of the deputies and continued to obstruct the investigation. In early July, at approximately 6:00 p.m., Spokane Valley Deputies responded to a reported stabbing at an apartment in the area of the 2800 block of N. Cherry St. in Spokane Valley. Arriving deputies contacted a 48-year-old female suspect and the 45-year-old female victim. They were told the 22-year-old male suspect had left the area before deputies arrived. The female suspect was extremely agitated and verbally aggressive toward call takers and arriving deputies, She threatened to kill cops if anyone injured the male suspect, and she Page 4 planned to sue. When Deputy Wallace arrived, she continued screaming, "You (expletive) cops are not going in my house!" Knowing the victim was inside, had been stabbed in the chest near her heart with a knife, and was in desperate need of life-saving medical assistance, Deputy Wallace and Deputy Turner entered the apartment through the unlocked door. The victim was found sitting on the floor, with blood pooling in her lap. Recognizing the victim's life was in danger, Deputy Turner retrieved his SWAT Medic bag from his patrol car, and they provided vital life-saving medical care. As they did, the female suspect charged toward them with her fists clenched, yelling, "Get the (expletive) out!" Verbal commands for the female suspect to stop and to get back were not effective. Deputy Wallace,who was applying direct pressure to the wound to try and control the bleeding, momentarily released pressure to address the impending attack, but noticed dark red blood began to flow rapidly from the wound. He quickly reapplied pressure, risking his safety, and braced to withstand being hit as he again told the female suspect to stop and that they were trying to save the victim's life. Deputy Turner and Deputy Wallace were extremely concerned for the victim, �.v SHERIFF recognizing her condition was grave. The female suspect pushed past and continued yelling the deputies were "evil goons with guns," "murderous pigs" and "armed thugs." Hearing the deputies talk about a large knife sitting by them, the female suspect started to move aggressively toward it. Orders telling her to stop and get away were effective, and she reluctantly backed away. The deputies noticed a small child was now with the female suspect. They told the female to take the child, who appeared to be very scared, out of the room. Her only response was to continue her verbal attacks. She yelled, "These are bad guys, evil men!" and told the child he needed to hide because the "goon squad"was there with guns, and it wasn't safe. Fire and medical personnel arrived and took over the care and treatment of the victim. She was transported to the hospital for continued care. The female suspect stood in the bathroom with the child and continued her hate-filled rant. One of the firefighters attempted to talk with her to obtain needed and vital medical information regarding the victim,but she would not relent and would not answer the much-needed medical questions. Deputy Wallace heard deputies request assistance in the parking lot because the male suspect had returned, and he went out to help. Deputy Wallace tallied with the male suspect and began to de-escalate the intense situation. The male suspect eventually complied, followed commands, and was safely taken into custody. Deputy Wallace returned to assist Deputy Turner with the female suspect and ensure the child's safety. Attempts to listen, empathize, and de-escalate this volatile situation were ineffective. Fearing for the child's safety with the female suspect's aggression increasing, Deputy Wallace quickly placed himself between the female suspect and the child as he attempted to take control ofthe female suspect. She responded by striking the deputy. As additional deputies attempted to help gain control of the female suspect, Deputy Blaalanan grabbed the child and handed him off to Deputy Schmidt, who brought the child to a safe location. After a struggle where the female suspect tried to kick, bite and hit deputies, OC spray was used, and she was subdued. She was provided medical attention before being transported and booked into the Spokane County Jail for Assault 3`d Degree and Obstructing an Investigation. She was released the next day on her own recognizance. Major Crimes Detectives and members of the Spokane County Sheriff's Forensic Unit responded to continue the investigation and process the scene for evidence. The male suspect was transported and booked into the Spokane County Jail for Assault 1st Degree. He remains in custody with his bond set at $75,000. The victim was hospitalized and was listed in satisfactory condition shortly thereafter. Page 5 Suspect Armed with a Knife Chases Victims - Spokane Valley Patrol Deputies arrested a male suspect armed with a knife after he reportedly threatened and chased three victims around a parking lot. The suspect was quickly located and taken into custody without incident. He was booked into jail for three counts of Assault 2nd Degree. In mid-July, at approximately 10:15 p.m., Spokane Valley Deputies responded to the report of a male chasing and threatening people in a parking lot located in the 10400 block of E. Sprague in Spokane Valley. The 27-year-old male suspect was said to be armed with a knife. Arriving deputies learned the suspect ran south, across Sprague. He was described as wearing a black shirt and blue pants. Deputy Criswell located a male matching the description on the south side of U-Haul. The suspect followed commands and was safely taken into custody by Deputies Criswell and Kullman. Deputy Lederle contacted the victims and learned they were standing in the parking lot when they observed the suspect.He was yelling and waving a knife around. The suspect then charged toward the victims yelling, "I'm going to stab you in the chest!" One victim, a female, and her infant got in her car as the male suspect chased the two male victims.All three victims stated they feared for their lives. The suspect was identified and arrested. He was transported and booked into the Spokane County Jail for three counts of Assault 2"a Degree. Thankfully, no one was injured during this dangerous and potentially deadly incident. Uncooperative Trespass Suspect & Convicted Felon Found in Possession of a Handgun with an Altered Serial Number and Drugs - Spokane Valley Patrol Deputies arrested a male,sleeping in his car at a closed credit union after refusing to leave the parking lot of the closed business. The male, a convicted felon, was arrested without the use of force. A handgun containing a loaded magazine and a white crystallized substance believed to be Methamphetainine was recovered from the vehicle. Upon closer inspection, the serial number of the firearm had been altered/removed. The suspect was booked into jail for two felonies and two misdemeanor charges: In mid-July, at approximately 4:10 a.m., Spokane Valley Deputies responded to a reported suspicious vehicle parked at a closed credit union in the 9200 block of E. Mission. Arriving at the scene, Deputy Materne contacted the caller; a security officer contracted to manage the credit union's property. The security officer stated he observed the late 90's Oldsmobile parked in the lot of the closed financial institution. He had checked the area a couple of hours prior, and the vehicle was not there. He requested to have anyone inside the car contacted and trespassed from the location. Deputy Materne approached the vehicle and observed blankets and towels placed over the windows to obstruct anyone's view. He knocked on the windows loudly and verbally identified himself as police multiple times without a response. As he continued to try and contact anyone inside, a 45-year-old male pulled one of the blankets down, revealing himself and the inside of the car. Deputy Materne told the male he was parked in a private lot of a closed business, trespassing and that he needed to leave immediately. Instead of complying, the male looked at the deputy and then laid back down. Deputy Materne observed mail addressed to "Frank," a few empty bottles of liquor, and what appeared to be a glass marijuana pipe. He continued to try and get the male suspect to comply or respond as Deputy Kauffman arrived to assist. The security officer confirmed he wanted the male suspect charged with trespassing, since it appeared he didn't want to cooperate. A check of the vehicle identification number showed it was registered to the male suspect out of Fremont County, Wyoming. As they continued to try and wake the male, Deputy Kauffman announced he observed a black semi-auto handgun near the male's feet. The deputies moved back to their patrol cars to create distance and avoid a violent conflict, and requested additional deputies to assist. Continual announcements over the patrol car's PA system went unanswered. Dispatchers contacted Fremont County, Wyoming, and Page 6 learned the male suspect was a convicted felon, prohibited from possessing firearms. Additionally, the convictions were for violent crimes,he was known to be intoxicated, and deputies were advised to use caution when contacting him. With the male suspect trespassing and his failure to respond or comply with commands continually provided over a PA system, coupled with his criminal history and apparent unlawful access to a firearm as a convicted felon, deputies devised a plan to use ballistic shields to approach safely and contact the male; his hands remained visible, but he was non- responsive. Entry was made into the vehicle through an unlocked door. The male suspect was quickly taken into custody without incident. After being advised of his rights,he admitted he ignored deputies hoping they'd leave, and he wouldn't be arrested for unlawfully possessing a firearm. He purchased the handgun, a Hi-Point 45 ACP with a Ioaded magazine, and figured it might be stolen after noticing someone had tried to remove the serial number. A small plastic baggie containing a white crystalline substance was also recovered. A field test showed a presumptive positive result for Methamphetamine. The male suspect was transported and booked into the Spokane County Jail for Unlawfirl Possession of a Firearm 2" Degree, Possession of a Controlled Substance- Methamphetamine, Possession of a Firearm with Altered/Obliterated ID Marks, and Criminal Trespassing 2"1 Degree, Later in the day, the male was released from jail on his own recognizance, following his court appearance. Welfare Check Leads to Suspect's Arrest for Multiple Crimes - Spokane Valley Patrol Deputy responded to a welfare check of a male passed out in the driver's seat. During the contact, Methamphetamine, Heroin, Shaved Keys, and evidence of Fraud were found, leading to the male's arrest. In mid-July, at approximately 2:40 p.m., Spokane Valley Deputy Walton responded to a parking lot in the 13900 block of E. Indiana, for the report of a male passed out while seated in the driver's seat of an SUV,with the door wide open. When Deputy Walton arrived, he found the 36- year-old male slumped over inside the vehicle. The male,who showed _ signs of being under the influence, did not wake up until Deputy 1_767iniFF Walton shook him. Deputy Walton asked for the male's ID, and the suspect moved a black/red camera case sitting in his lap, behind the }, seat in an attempt to conceal it. The suspect said he was looking for • re- his wallet, which was in his lap, as he continued to try and hide the case, despite commands to stop reaching around and to keep his hands visible. A check of the male's name revealed his driving privileges 1t5°°� - were suspended, and he was under Washington State Department of Corrections supervision. The male suspect admitted to driving to the - location and was arrested. After his arrest, during a search of the suspect, Deputy Walton located a large amount of a white crystalline substance,believed to be Methamphetamine, in a clear plastic baggie, in addition to $640 in cash and two $100 bills that appeared to be ,q., counterfeit. A large amount of a white substance, believed to be �` -.. t Methamphetamine, was located in the camera case, which the suspect had attempted to hide. Also found in the vehicle was a bindle believed to contain a small amount of Heroin, $2,100 in what appeared to be counterfeit bills, four suspicious-looking/possible altered/forged checks, 35 "shaved keys" commonly used to steal vehicles, used grocery bags widely used to package illegal drugs for sales, four cell phones, two credit cards not in the suspect's name, a glass pipe, and a notebook with various gift card company information. The Secret Service responded Pagel to investigate the counterfeit money. The amount of Methamphetamine seized was determined to be larger than a regular personal use amount. That,coupled with the amount of unexplained cash located, Heroin, and other drug paraphernalia, the male suspect was charged with Possession of a Controlled Substance(PCS)-Methamphetamine with Intent to Deliver. Through the investigation,Deputy Walton learned some of the checks were forged or altered. The male suspect's local criminal history was found to be lengthy, showing charges of Controlled Substance-Possession/Sales, Forgery, Theft, Fraud, and several other property and Violent Crimes. The male suspect was transported and booked into the Spokane County Jail for PCS with Intent to Deliver-Methamphetamine, Financial Fraud- Possession of Payment Instruments, Forgery, Possession of Motor Vehicle Theft Tools, and Driving While Suspended. The next day, following his appearance in court, he was released from jail on his own recognizance. Car Prowler Brandishes Pistol when Confronted by Homeowner - Spokane Valley Patrol Deputies located a vehicle prowler suspected of entering a vehicle and displaying a pistol when the homeowner confronted him. The handgun,later determined to be a realist looking BB gun, was located in a backpack the suspect discarded. In late July,at approximately 10:50 a.m., Spokane Valley Deputies responded to the report of a male breaking into cars in the 10800 block of E. Nora in Spokane Valley. The suspect reportedly pulled a gun on the caller and was last seen running east . towards University. The caller stated he observed the 28-year-old r, male suspect standing next to his sister's car. He told the suspect to leave, and soon after noticed items inside the vehicle had been moved — around. The victim drove to the suspect's location and confronted him. The male suspect threw a flashlight at the victim and continued walking east on Mission. The suspect then took off his backpack and pulled out a semi-automatic pistol and said, "I don't want any trouble" . when the victim approached him again. The male suspect put the handgun back in his backpack and ran south on Glenn. The victim - — stated he feared the suspect would have shot him, if he hadn't backed away. Several deputies arrived in the area and began to search for the male suspect. A homeowner in the 1500 block of N. Glenn reported a HekiFF male(the suspect), was in his neighbor's backyard and was attempting � to hide next to a shed. While deputies searched the backyard,Deputy Ortiz observed a male, sweating profusely and matching the suspect's description, walk out of a yard in the 11009 block of E. Maxwell. Deputy Ortiz activated his emergency lights, notified other patrol units of his location, and began giving the suspect commands. Initially, the male suspect was slow to respond, but eventually followed commands. With the assistance of responding deputies, the male suspect was taken into custody without incident. Deputies learned he had dumped his backpack during his attempt to flee. The suspect's backpack was located in the backyard of a nearby home. Inside, deputies found a silver and black BB gun,which was not easily distinguishable from a real firearm. A check of the suspect's name revealed a valid misdemeanor warrant(Vehicle Prowl 2nd and Possession of Stolen Property 3rd). It was determined the suspect did enter the vehicle, but nothing was stolen. Deputy Korpi transported and booked the male suspect into the Spokane County Jail for his warrant and new misdemeanor charges of Assault 4th Degree, Brandishing/Intimidating with a Weapon, and Vehicle Trespassing 2"d Degree. The male, who shows six other arrests this year for similar type crimes, was released on his own recognizance by the courts after being booked. Page 8 Spokane Valley Deputies Resuscitate Unconscious Person with No Pulse-Spokane Valley Patrol Deputies responded to a welfare check and located an unconscious adult female with no pulse. Suspecting an overdose, they immediately began CPR and administered Narcan. After several minutes of providing care, a pulse was found, and she started to breathe on her own. In late July, during the morning hours, Spokane Valley Deputies responded to a home for a welfare check. A family member reported they were worried about the wellbeing of the homeowner, an adult female. The caller stated the female hadn't answered the phone or returned calls in several hours. The female was upset due to an argument and had attempted to harm herself in the past. Spokane Valley Deputy Logan Henry responded,but no one answered the door. Inside he observed several large dogs that appeared aggressive. The female's vehicle was secured in the garage. Deputy Joseph Wallace arrived at the residence to assist. They located an unsecured door and called for the female, but no answer was received. The dogs continued to aggressively bark and growl and appeared to be protective of their home. The Deputies believed the female was inside the residence and potentially in need of life-saving help. Without permission to enter the home and despite the risk of being bitten or attacked by the large dogs, both deputies decided to make entry. They were able to push past the dogs and located the female lying in the hallway. She was cold to the touch, unconscious, and no pulse was detected. Suspecting an overdose, Deputy Wallace began CPR while Deputy Logan retrieved his Narcan kit from his vehicle. He administered the first dose, but the female did riot respond. As CPR continued, a second dose was administered. Just as medical personnel arrived to assist, the deputies detected a pulse, and the female began to breathe on her own. Spokane Valley Fire and AMR staff took over care, and she was transported to the hospital. The following morning, she was in stable condition, but remained in ICU. Example of Things You Shouldn't Do at Midnight if You have Warrants, Drugs, and an Illegal Knife - Spokane Valley Patrol Deputies, responding to an alarm call at a closed business, observed a male leaving the area in an apparent hurry. Upon contact, the male initially Iied about his identity. After learning the truth, deputies discovered he had three felony warrants for his arrest. He was also found to be in possession of Methamphetamine and an illegal "switchblade" knife. In late July, at approximately 12:10 a.m., Spokane Valley Deputy Stefan Moore and Deputy Natalie Woolard responded as a two-person patrol unit to an alarm call at the Cenex gas station located at 1421 N. Pines. The alarm company reported the east side doors were tripped, activating an audible alarm. As they approached from the north,they observed a male hurriedly leaving from the direction of Cenex. They contacted the 58-year-old male in the parking lot just to the north of the gas station. Initially,the male said he hadn't been at the Cenex, but quickly changed his story, explaining he thought the station was open and pulled on the door when he tried to enter. He also stated he did not hear an audible alarm. When asked, he verbally provided the deputies with a name and date of birth. Finding no record for the information, Deputy Moore confirmed the information and again, found no record. Believing he was lying to avoid arrest, Deputy Woolard confronted him with her suspicion. He admitted he lied and provided his first name. He was detained for providing false information and eventually identified by a Washington State ID card. A check of his name revealed three felony warrants for his arrest (original charges of Violation of an Order and two Residential Burglary charges). During a search after his arrest, Deputy Woolard located a plastic haggle containing a white crystalline substance, and an illegal "switchblade" spring-loaded knife in a sheathe on his hip. The substance was field tested and showed a presumptive positive result for Methamphetamine. A check of the gas station showed the business was closed and all the doors were Page 9 secured, The male suspect was transported and booked into the Spokane County Jail for his warrant and new charges of Possession of a Controlled Substance-Methamphetarnine and Possession of a Dangerous Weapon-Spring Blade Knife. Spokane County Sheriff's Office Marine Enforcement Unit Focused on. Safety during Paddle Safe Week. This year, July 19 — 25 was declared Paddle Safe Week in Washington state. The Spokane County Sheriff's Office Marine Enforcement Unit joined the Washington State Parks Boating Program to promote this public safety campaign. The campaign's focus was to create a culture of safety among people who kayak, canoe, and stand up paddleboard. Paddlesports continue to grow in popularity, and so are fatal accidents involving paddlers. Since 2012, close to half of all boating fatalities in Washington state involved paddlecraft. The leading type of accident is capsizing and swamping, and the leading cause of death is drowning. In many cases,victims were not wearing life jackets. "Paddlesports are very popular in our area due to our abundant waterways. We want citizens to enjoy the water, but we want them to do it safely," said Deputy James Ebel SCSO Marine Enforcement Coordinator. Experts recommend the following safety tips for paddlers: • Get educated: Know the laws and keep yourself and others safe. At a minimum,take a course to increase your knowledge of paddlesport safety, emergency procedures, and navigational rules. You can find classes through local clubs and outfitters, city and county parks and recreation departments, and online. • Always wear a life jacket: State law requires all vessels, including canoes, kayaks and stand up paddleboards,to have at least one properly fitted Coast Guard-approved life jacket for each person on board. Additionally, all children, age 12 and younger are always required to wear life jackets. Modern,comfortable life jackets are tailored specifically for paddlesports.No matter your age and skill level, you're encouraged to wear a life jacket every time you go out on the water. • Carry essential gear: Carry the essentials for safety, emergency communications, and comfort. State law requires boaters to carry a sound-producing device, such as a whistle—even on a stand up paddleboard. Professional paddlers recommend carrying a cell phone (in a waterproof bag) and, on coastal waters, a VHF marine radio. In addition to items required by law, you should wear sun protection and bring a headlamp with extra batteries, a dry bag, and hydrating fluids. Carry a bilge pump and an extra paddle. Other essentials depend on the type of waterway and length of trip, which should be researched in advance. • Check and understand the weather: Check the weather frequently before and during your trip, keeping an eye on current conditions and forecasts. Check warnings,weather conditions,wind and wave forecasts, tides, and current conditions or river flows. It's essential to understand how each of these elements affects your ability to operate your vessel. Seek information from locals in the know, heed any warnings, and avoid navigating in unsafe areas. The National Weather Service (NOAA Weather Radio) broadcasts on marine band and standalone weather radios. • Protect against cold-water shock: Falling into water under 60 degrees is dangerous, and many of Washington's waters remain below 60 degrees all year — including lakes and rivers even during hot weather. The most significant risk is not hypothermia but cold-water shock, which Page 10 occurs in the first stage of immersion. Paddlecraft have a higher risk of capsizing. Avoid cotton and wear synthetic materials when a wet or dry suit is not available. Be prepared and always wear a life jacket. • Avoid alcohol and drugs: Situational awareness is key for safety on the water. That means always staying alert. Operating any vessel while under the influence of alcohol or drugs, including marijuana, is not only unsafe—it's illegal. Washington state's Boating Under the Influence (BUI} law applies to all boats, including kayaks, canoes, stand up paddleboards, rowboats and inflatable fishing rafts. • Be visible to other boaters: Paddlecraft sit low on the water, making them difficult for other boaters to see. Paddle to be seen: Wear bright neon and contrasting colors, put highly reflective tape on paddles, use a flagpole, and carry a bright light. • File a float plan: Before you head out, study your intended route and let someone know your plans. Include names of everyone going, the planned route, what time you're going and returning, and what to do if you don't return when expected. Make this a routine every time you go out on the water. • Label your paddlecraft: If you own paddlecraft, keep your contact information in your boat, on a sticker, or in some other way. When empty paddlecraft are found adrift, it's assumed someone is in danger, and a search is launched. Calling the owner of a kayak or canoe found adrift can help prevent unnecessary searches and free up resources. The call could also help rescuers gather information that helps with the search. The U.S. Coast Guard Auxiliary provides free identification stickers at safe boating classes and other boating events. • Understand and follow the U.S. Coast Guard's "Navigation Rules of the Road" at https://www.naveen.uscg.gov/?pageName—navRulesContent • Follow social media: People can learn more about and participate in Paddle Safe Week through social media by using some of the following hashtags: #PaddleSafeWeek, #PaddleSmart, #PaddleSafe,#PaddleSober, #PaddlePrepared, #PaddleToBeSeen Visit www.paddlesafewa.org to learn more. Page 11. Paddlesport Safety Tip - - - ALWAYS WEAR WMIT YOUR LIFE JACKET IffjSIIIIiG1011! Wear it Like a Pro The flea sign of a rookie paddler le samoana who isn't wearing a life locket.Esporioncod paddlers wear lifejackets whenever they're on the water. Make it Fit !� ik Adjust your life jacket so that lees snug and comfortable.It should k -' not lift up when pulled by the shoulders.Modem life jackets corns �` ` In all rhos.with models for children.woman and mon, Don't Tempt the Odds 11111 be .n 85 0 of fatal canoeing accidents and '+s 48%0 of kayaking fatalities Involve people who were riot wearing a life jacket.Don't be a statistic.Wear your life jacket. + r opf We encourage residents who have operational surveillance cameras outside their home to go to the Sheriff's website and register their home and video cameras. Thank you. https://www.s r okanecoun .or•/1080/Sheriff -1 fi _ , o a ..m•w u�err«r.rv..rn molt. VIP Video Identification Program CLICK HEItE. to vulumarily join the VIP prngrnm LOCK OBSERVE CARS SHOULD KEEP GARAGE ITEMS IN AND REPORT NEVER RUN DOORS CLOSED YOUR TRUNK UNATTENDED Page 1.2 Spokane County Sheriffs Office GOuNT�� . l r� Regional Intelligence Group �© �1 `� ,� Spokane Valley Districts '1 .,,.,-e.' ,, :,, ay tie . IBR Classification: Burglary R IC; 90 I , I 80 4 70 60 50 t� 2017 40 2018 2019 30 Calendar 2020 I 20 I i 10 0 >- ? S J >- w >- F— Q z cC cK [C [SC U K < Z w ✓1 w w w w 1 n co m co LU a q (9 2 d 2 2 Z ec 2 9 w F— w w Q c0 Q I— U > U w n. 0 0 w LL w Q VY Year Month Count 2017 2018 2019 Calendar 2020 January 55 51 33 40 February 53 26 20 56 March 42 33 37 53 April 49 36 35 70 May 47 34 57 68 June 59 29 38 68 July 51 44 48 62 August 55 51 57 September 78 38 50 October 37 48 46 November 32 49 40 December 33 47 40 Grand Total '592 486 501 417 * IBR Offense: Burglary/Breaking&Entering 220 Produced: 8/19/2020 For Law Enforcement Use Only This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF, inauthoriaed persons pursuant to RCW 42.56.420 Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. Spokane County Sheriff's Office �GOUNT .4,f Regional Intelligence Group fl , Spokane Valley Districts (n '. IBR Classification: Murder NonNeg Manslaughter PIG q 1.2 1 1 LI • e I 0,8 I 0,6 —A-2017 - 1-a2018 —A-2019 0a Calendar 2020 0,2 0 r >- x > LU r F- M m DC cc cc ct U EC Q Z -J N w w w w D m m [O m D D Q Q 0 0 2 2 Z cz 2 a w t- w w a m ¢ F- u > U La w 0 p w z o m Year Month Count 2017 2018 2019 Calendar 2020 January February 1 March April May 1 June 1 July 1 August September October November 1 December 1 Grand Total 2 1 1 2 *IBR Offense:Murder/Non-Negligent Manslaughter 09A Produced: 8/19/2020 For Law Enforcement Use Only This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF, inauthorized persons pursuant to RCW 42.56.420 Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. Spokane County Sheriff's Office t,c°UNT r7 %Regional Intelligence Group a l & ' -:'-i -_, -ril ,J, Spokane Valley Districts IBR Classification: Identity Theft RIG c 500 I I 450 400 l I 350 I ' I 300 250 12017 —2018 200 I —A--2019 150 I — Calendar 2020 100 I ill 1 I 50 0 r } x J } lu r F re K K ce cc ce U �. Q z _, .1 w w w w d ¢ re a 2 n n co m co no D < Q 0 0 2 z cc 2 w F- w w Q coQ I— U > tJ —, 0. 0 a w L. o w Year Month Count 2017 2018 2019 Calendar 2020 January 9 20 19' 17 February 24 16 10 16 March 22 13 13 12 April 15 22 19 17 May 32 21 13 442 June 19 17 5 48 July 23 14 12 25 August 13 14 8 September 17 13 14 October 15 21 17 November 19 23 12 December 25 16 7 Grand Total 234 210 149 577 *IBR Offense: Identity Theft 26F Produced: 8/19/2020 For Law Enforcement Use Only This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF, unauthorized persons pursuant to RCW 42.56.420 Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. Spokane County Sheriff's Office ,couNi} Regional Intelligence Group 'e 4% 0 , r—I A' 1 .).' ,:ii i ---‘ '7; Spokane Valley Districts IBR Classification: Fraud RIG 9 90 I 80 70 60 50 I —0-2017 40 —II—2018 v --A--2019 a0 Calendar 2020 I 20 10 0 p' w u K Q z J in w w w LU a a ? 7 co onco a o 2 0 7 2 z cc 7 7 w H w w < on Q 'r 4-) 7 U 0 0 w LL w 0 in Year Month Count 2017 2018 2019 Calendar 2020 January 26 69 65 70 February 36 46 32 58 March 37 59 63 49 April 43 55 57 61 May 53 67 56 85 June 57 65 50 73 July 61 65 65 64 August 53 62 65 September 66 49 55 October 64 60 75 November 54 56 68 December 43 60 49 Grand Total 593 713 700 460 * IBR Offense:Fraud-Credit Card/ATM 26B,Fraud-False Pretenses/Swindling/Con Games 26A,&Fraud-Impersonation 26C Produced: 8/19/2020 For Law Enforcement Use Only This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF, inauthnrized persons pursuant to RCW 42.56.420 Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. Spokane County Sheriffs Office ,,GOUNrI- Regional Intelligence Group � ,, � 4 Spokane Valley Districts 5:, ' • IBR Classification: DUI RIG 9 45 40 35 )\ 1 30 25 r Ili -1,— 2017 \ if 20 l ii A 'ill\ - -2018 1 -2019 15 Calendar 2020 10 1 V 5 1 0 } } = -J >- W } F. CC CC CC aC 5 CC U < z 01 W W ui 41 M a U ® o 2 2 d Z cc. 2 < W U W au m U "i U W a o o W LL W z 0 01 Year Month Count 2017 2018 2019 Calendar 2020 January 22 21 32 25 February 26 18 21 28 March 33 39 21 9 April 18 13 27 18 May 19 33 18 16 June 28 23 27 27 July 26 15 25 25 August 24 28 23 September 19 37 40 October 24 33 29 November 18 31 35 December 23 22 21 Grand Total 277 313 319 148 * IBR Offense:DUI 90D Produced: 8/19/2020 For Law Enforcement Use Only This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF, inauthorized persons pursuant to RCW 42.56.420 Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. Spokane County Sheriff's Office Intelligence Group o, �l" i -, .. , Spokane Valley Districts � -" IBR Classification: Drugs RIG c) 80 I 20 (//0\ . 60 i'//f ft/ \ I , I 50 40 \\/\.., Ekdar2O2O 20Y i I { 20 1 10 I 0 r 5- s -4 >- w >-- F- LC ce ec s W w U oC 4 z _1 vo w w w (Li « <{ cC a 2 n a n m m m m z ct 2 D w }- w w <( m Q !-- U i U ua c_ 0 D w u_ w Z d 14 Year Month Count ' 2017 2018 2019 Calendar 2020 January 19 42 52 49 February 30 38 42 61 March 30 64 58 53 April 37 56 67 38 May 23 36 40 64 June 20 56 30 53 July 21 57 45 38 August 26 43 54 September 25 33 43 October 24 52 44 November 39 41 56 December 25 48 40 Grand Total 319 566 571 356 * IBR Offense:Drug Equipment Violations 358&Drugs/Narcotics Violations 35A Produced: R/19/2020 For Law Enforcement Use Only This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF. 'nautharized persons pursuant to RCW 42.56.420 Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. Spokane County Sheriff's Office ��.i COUr,,.NT Regional Intelligence Group �a , #.„... Spokane Valley Districts 1_101 ° IBR Classification: Theft From Motor Vehicle RIG q 1 160 140 120 4 100 rr ‘41 80 a_ 110,40, 1`1 � —41—2017 —A-2018 60 I —A—2019 —0—Calendar 2020 40 s.: j 20 0 T ? L J } W Y F- OC K 2 cc [C U < Z .-J & W W W W a Q 7 7 a1 co m c0 a z Ic 2 7 w F- w w CO < I- V 7 U W 0 d u vs Year Month Count 2017 2018 2019 Calendar 2020 January 99 75 51 67 February 104 32 44 98 March 94 78 72 58 April 130 62 120 75 May 78 69 140 85 June 107 66 84 81 July 97 106 112 78 August 69 87 98 September 118 85 80 October 70 104 97 November 52 112 96 December 70 70 112 Grand Total 1088 946 1106 542 * IBR Offense:Theft From Motor Vehicle 23F Produced: 8/19/2020 For Law Enforcement Use Only This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF, Inauthorized persons pursuant to RCW 42.56.420 Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. Spokane County Sheriff's Office tiGOUNi'I...,��, Regional Intelligence Group a ... y ,v, Spokane Valley Districts L as', IBR Classification: Motor Vehicle Theft R IG 9 50 45 40 35 30 Tv Allik lik 4. 44,0 ,1 I I I k 25 -2017 —6—2018 20 f —#—2019 I 15 —IN—Calendar 2020 10 5 I 0 r > = — Y w - I— cc cc cc cc cc p[ U _ Q Z -1 VI w w w w Q Q 7 m m m m Z cc 7 7 w I- w w a m < F- U > U w a 0 0 w w w Z 0 N Year Month Count 2017 2018 2019 Calendar 2020 January 44 36 34 32 February 37i 24 22 32 March 44 28 19 31 April 42 27 29 29 May 27 25 33 29 June 28 24 25 33 July 41 39 31 25 August 36 18 31 September 43 26 37 October 40 31 25 November 34 45 36 December 78 29 35 Grand Total 444 352 357 211 * IBR Offense: Motor Vehicle Theft 240 Produced: 8/19/2020 For Law Enforcement Use Only This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF. Inauthorized persons pursuant to RCW 42.56.420 Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. Spokane County Sheriff's Office �Gomirk , Regional Intelligence Group noas },�. . Rr Spokane Valley Districts — ,;`?€ IBR Classification: Robbery R 1 G q 14 1 i 12 to I i 1 8 1 •att .j I �2017 6 F; `c7 -_ —0—2018 1 —�2019 4 --f—Calendar 2020 2 I c r r = _, ›- Li, r 1- cc a: cc cc cc cc V K Q 7 J V1 w w w w Q Q D 7 M m cocD Z ce 2 7 w I— w w q al Q I— U 7 U w a O p w w L. p Lei Year Month Count 2017 2018 2019 Calendar 2020 January 3 6 3 8 February 6 2 8 7.2 March 7 5 4 6 April 3 6 4 8 May 2 8 6 3 June 1 3 2 8 July 4 7 8 5 August 1 6 11 September 4 6 8 October 4 5 7 November 3 3 11 December 1 4 10 Grand Total 39 61 82 50 * IBR Offense: Robbery 120 Produced: 8/19/2020 For Law Enforcement Use Only This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF. Inauthorized persons pursuant to RCW 42.55.420 Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. Spokane County Sheriff's Office - ,,courvrps Regional Intelligence Group Q.p rA. P % cn , ...,..1-4,i -- .,.-Li ...f Spokane Valley Districts tf, IBR Classification: Assault -A 1G 120 [ I AIL 1 100 # Am , _lir Allikik1Wfroloopir 1 80 60 -4-2017 - -2018 —A-2019 40 u—Calendar 2020 20 0 r a X _, r w >- H Erz oc ac U ce Q z w w w w w Q ¢ m a 7 = = a m m m m z ce 7 o w r w w a m a U > U w - 0 0 w w w z 0 Year Month Count 2017 2018 2019 Calendar 2020 January I 95 84 71 93 February 95 62 62 95 March 78 100 74 80 April 9D 88 68 97 May 93 80 87 87 June 93 102 79 104 July 95 112 103 87 August 73 84 95 September 92 76 72 October 87 82 67 November 84 79 85 December 84 89 77 Grand Total 1060 1038 940 643 * IBR Offense:Aggravated Assault 13A&Simple Assault 13B Produced: 8/19/2020 For Law Enforcement Use Only This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF, mauthorized persons pursuant to RCW 42.56.420 Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. Spokane County Sheriff's Office courvr4 1 rYs. ,. 1 A. , Regional Intelligence Group ?, ,'-% ,:„, Spokane Valley Districts s IBR Classification: Theft ?ICi C) 300 250 200 \\ -04 ."-----7" " --.441116111111111111, \IL"—. 150 —0-2017 l —II-2018 - 2019 100 (Calendar 2020 50 0 1 >- - 2 _, Lu r 3- ,cc cc x cc K u cc Q Z -, N) LSJ W W W a a z d 2 D : co on co co D D 4 < l7 2 C. 2 z cc 2 D w 1— w Lu coa e- u > u W a 0 0 W , W z 0 Year Month Count 2017 2018 2019 Calendar 2020 January 205 238 238 240 February 199 165 188 199 March 214 208 212 197 April 203 202 208 181 May 235 230 230 153 June 251 223 230 220 July 236 236 236 202 August 222 213 256 September 213 194 230 October 237 234 239 November 219 198 206 December 198 251 231 Grand Total 2632 2592 2704 1392 * IBR Offense:Theft-All Other 23H,Theft-Pocket-Picking 23A,Theft- Purse-Snatching 23B,Theft-Shoplifting 23C,Theft From Building 23D, Theft From Coin-Operated Machine 23E, &Theft of Motor Vehicle Parts/Accessories 23G Produced: 8/19/2020 For Law Enforcement Use Only This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF. inauthorized persons pursuant to RCW 42.56.420 Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. Spokane County Sheriff's Office )cOUNr .ri � Regional Intelligence Group o + ':1 ` alE Nl,i Spokane Valley Districts _> IBR Classification: Rape Rio c) 18 16 14 12 10 --0—2017 8 —it—20197 �r 2019 044100 _844•44tiop /* --II—Calendar 2020 2 . Ir a' cr (_J K Q J N7 W w W w Q Q K _, D La al ® m z ec 2 .D w N w w Q al Q I— U 7 U -_. w el 4 p w LL w O Year Month Count 2017 2018 2019 Calendar 2020 January 9 169 3 February 2 4 3 2 March 3 8 4 2 April 7 6 5 May 9 9 3 3 June 2 7 5 5 July is 5 3 :1. August . 3 3 4 September 2 3 9 October 7 1 4 November L 6 2 December ±I 7 4 Grand Total 57 75 49 15 *IBR Offense: Rape-Forcible 11A,Sodomy-Forcible 11B,Sexual Assault Produced: 8/19/2020 with Object-- 11C For Law Enforcement Use Only This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF. inauthorized persons pursuant to RCW 42.56.420 Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. Spokane County Sheriff's Office , COUNT Regional Intelligence Group p ,r ' F ~rt Spokane Valley Districts ', IBR Classification: Counterfeiting Forgery RIG () 30 25 , 20 \,f 4 LIIIIIY.' ,... .'I \ , A, is -.-2017 41 \ -2018 1 —A-•2019 10 1-0—Calendar 2020 5 I 0 r r I - r w r F- oc w ce ce w U , a z --' en w w w w Q 7 7 m co m m 7 7 < a 0 2 o y g z x 2 7 w I- w w C m Q I- U 3 u w n 0 a w w ux z 0 L Year Month Count 2017 2018 2019 Calendar 2020 January 9 18 22 22 February 11 10 13 11 _ March 20 24 17 14 April 20 22 13 14 May 26 21 10 10 June 15 15 14 7 July 21 15 10 10 August 14 17 13 September 20 14 11 October 18 11 14 November 9 20 21 December 0 14 15 Grand Total 192 201 173 88 *IBR Offense:Counterfeiting/Forgery 250 Produced: 8/19/2020 For Law Enforcement Use Only This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF, 'nauthorized persons pursuant to RCW 42.56.420 Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. Spokane County Sheriff's Office s5cOU1\t Regional Intelligence Group p 1 f Spokane Valley Districts IBR Classification: Destruction Damage Vandalism TRIG 9 200 180 160 I 444 ..._ 411,1,4 NIIIIIII, I tri 1 120 1 100 --*-2017 l - i—2018 80 ' —k-2019 60 —II—Calendar 2020 i 40 20 0 1 re cc U c, a z _. Lo Lu w L. L. a a r .. 2 n m m m m a U' c 0 2 z ce 2 5 w 1-- L.), ua a m < F- u a u —. L. L. o o w Cz Year Month Count 2017 2018 2019 Calendar 2020 January 159 146 124 113 February 148 95 67 141 March 136 121 122 105 April 173 127 144 158 May 139 142 161 118 June 143 140 133 154 July 178 141 156 146 August 149 132 144 September 160 155 141 October 119 165 165 _ November 131 155 140 December 105 125 174 Grand Total 1740 1644 1671 935 IBR Offense: Destruction/Damage/Vandalism 290 Produced: 8/19/2020 For Law Enforcement Use Only This document was created by an application that Isn't licensed to use novaPDF. inauthorized persons pursuant to RCW 42.56,420 Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: September 8, 2020 Department Director Approval Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation ® executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: EXECUTIVE SESSION: Pending Litigation GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 42.30.110(1)(i) PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: BACKGROUND: OPTIONS: RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: I move that Council adjourn into executive session for approximately 30 minutes to discuss pending litigation and that no action will be taken upon return to open session. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: STAFF CONTACT: Cary Driskell ATTACHMENTS: