Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
2020, 09-22 Regular Formal
AGENDA SPOKANE VALLEY CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING FORMAL FORMAT Tuesday,September 22,2020 6:00 p.m. Remotely via ZOOM Meeting 10210 E Sprague Avenue Council Requests Please Silence Your Cell Phones During Council Meeting NOTE: In response to Governor Inslee's March 24,2020 Proclamation concerning the COVID-19 Emergency,which waives and suspends the requirement to hold in-person meetings and provides options for the public to attend remotely, physical public attendance at Spokane Valley Council meetings are suspended until the Governor's order has been rescinded or amended. Therefore, effective immediately and until further notice, a live feed of the meeting will be available on our website and on Comcast channel 14.Public comments will only be accepted for those items noted on the agenda as "public comment opportunity," will be accepted via the following links, and must be received by 4:00 pm the day of the meeting. • Sign up to Provide Oral Public Comment at the Meeting via Calling-In • Submit Written Public Comment Prior to the Meeting • NEW: Join the Zoom WEB Meeting CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL APPROVAL OF AGENDA INTRODUCTION OF SPECIAL GUESTS AND PRESENTATIONS COMMITTEE,BOARD,LIAISON SUMMARY REPORTS MAYOR'S REPORT PROCLAMATION:Deaf Awareness Week GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT OPPORTUNITY [I]: Use the link above to sign up for oral public comments and indicate if you want to speak at General Public Comment Opportunity [1] or [2]. Citizens may only speak at one or the other,but not both. If there is no indication of which comment opportunity, you will be placed in the first. The link will guide you to directions to sign up for oral public comments. This is an opportunity for the public to speak on any subject except agenda action items,as public comments will be taken on those items where indicated. Please keep comments to matters within the jurisdiction of the City Government. This is not an opportunity for questions or discussion. Diverse points of view are welcome but please keep the remarks civil. Remarks will be limited to three minutes per person. 1.PUBLIC HEARING: 2021 Budget Revenues and Property Taxes—Chelsie Taylor [public comment opportunity] 2. CONSENT AGENDA: Consists of items considered routine which are approved as a group. Any member of Council may ask that an item be removed from the Consent Agenda to be considered separately. Proposed Motion:I move to approve the Consent Agenda. a.Approval of claim vouchers on Sept 22,2020,Request for Council Action Form Total: $3,180,962.65 b.Approval of Payroll for Pay Period Ending September 15,2020: $388,401.66 c.Approval of September 8,2020 Council Meeting Minutes,Regular Formal Format d.Approval of Resolution 20-013 Setting Planning Commission Public Hearing for Street Vacation e.Approval of Motion to Set 2021 Budget Hearing#2 for October 27,2020 Council Agenda Sept 22,2020 Page 1 of 2 NEW BUSINESS: 3. Second Reading Ordinance 20-011 Amending SVMC 9.20 Motorized Personal Transportation Devices —Erik Lamb [public comment opportunity] GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT OPPORTUNITY 121: Use the link above to sign up for oral public comments and indicate if you want to speak at General Public Comment Opportunity [1] or [2]. Citizens may only speak at one or the other,but not both. If there is no indication of which comment opportunity, you will be placed in the first. The link will guide you to directions to sign up for oral public comments. This is an opportunity for the public to speak on any subject except agenda action items,as public comments will be taken on those items where indicated. Please keep comments to matters within the jurisdiction of the City Government. This is not an opportunity for questions or discussion. Diverse points of view are welcome but please keep the remarks civil. Remarks will be limited to three minutes per person. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS: 4. Code Text Amendment 2020-0003 Nonconforming Use—Lori Barlow 5.Homeless Shelter Updates—Mark Calhoun,John Hohman,Morgan Koudelka 6. State Legislative Agenda—Cary Driskell,John Hohman,Mark Calhoun 7. Washington State Department of Transportation Land Acquisition,Flora Road—Cary Driskell 8.Advance Agenda—Mayor Wick INFORMATION ONLY(will not be reported or discussed): 9. Department Monthly Reports CITY MANAGER COMMENTS ADJOURNMENT Council Agenda Sept 22,2020 Page 2 of 2 S4okiiine .000 Valley ro cramatio n City of Spokane 1"a(I y, Washington CDeaf.Twareness Week WHEREAS, Deaf Awareness Week, also known as the International Week of the Deaf was first celebrated by the World Federation of the Deaf in Rome, Italy in 1958; and WHEREAS, The purpose of this organization is to acknowledge the American Sign Language as the primary communication mode for Deaf and Hard of Hearing communities; and WHEREAS, It is important to emphasize the full communication access for all settings so all Deaf and Hard of Hearing communities will be included in society and not marginalized; and WHEREAS, Deaf Awareness Week is the third week in September and is an opportunity for children and adults in Spokane Valley to learn about programs, services, education, and self-advocacy available to them through the Washington Advocacy of the Deaf and Hard of Hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, I, Ben Wick, Mayor of the City of Spokane Valley, on behalf of the Spokane Valley City Councilmembers, do hereby proclaim the week of September 21 through 25 as Deaf Awareness Week and we acknowledge that with equal rights and opportunities, deaf people succeed. Dated this 22nd day of September, 2020. Ben Wick, Mayor CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: September 22, 2020 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ® public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Public Hearing — 2021 Budget Revenues— Including Property Tax GOVERNING LEGISLATION: State budget law. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: No formal Council action has been taken on the 2021 Budget. A proposed budget is currently under review by the City Manager who will present his Preliminary 2021 Budget to the Council on October 13, 2020. BACKGROUND: This marks the third occasion where the Council will discuss the 2021 Budget and by the time the Council is scheduled to adopt the 2021 Budget on November 24, 2020, Council will have had an opportunity to discuss it on eight separate occasions, including three public hearings to gather input from citizens: • August 4 Council Budget Workshop • September 8 Admin report: Estimated 2021 revenues and expenditures • September 22 Public hearing #1 on 2021 revenues and expenditures • October 13 City Manager's presentation of preliminary 2021 Budget • October 27 Public hearing #2 on 2021 Budget • November 10 First reading on ordinance adopting the 2021 Budget • November 24 Public hearing #3 on 2021 Budget • November 24 Second reading on ordinance adopting the 2021 Budget State law requires that the City hold a public hearing on revenue sources for the upcoming year's budget in order to consider input from the public. An administrative report was presented to Council on this topic on September 8th and the public hearing is set for this evening. Until City Council adoption all figures currently included in the 2021 Budget worksheets are preliminary and subject to change by the City Manager. There have been changes to the 2021 Budget worksheets since the September 8th administrative report. These primarily consist of changes in the timing of capital projects after discussion with Engineering staff.The changes are indicated in blue in the attached budget summary worksheets. 2021 Budget Overview: • The 2021 Budget currently includes appropriations of $97,945,544 including $32,524,699 in capital expenditures, comprised in-part of: o $8,876,315 in Fund #303 Street Capital Projects. o $1,120,305 in Fund #309 Park Capital Projects. o $4,676,350 in Fund #311 Pavement Preservation including $991,843 financed by the General Fund. o $759,600 in Fund #312 Capital Reserve Fund. o $13,796,320 in Fund #314 Railroad Grade Separation Projects. 1 o $2,878,109 in Stormwater Management Fund #402 and Aquifer Protection Area Fund #403 projects. • To partially offset the $32,524,699 in capital costs we anticipate $21,054,702 in grant revenues which results in 64.73% of capital expenditures being covered with State and Federal money. • Budgets will be adopted across 24 separate funds. The City Hall Construction Fund #313 will be closed and a new Affordable & Supportive Housing Sales Tax Fund #108 will be created with a future 2020 Budget Amendment. • The full time equivalent employee (FTE) count will remain 95.25 in 2021. There is one vacant position in Economic Development being repurposed to Engineering due to workload and one vacant Engineer position that was budgeted 50/50 between Engineering and Street Capital Projects being repurposed to a Housing & Homeless Services Coordinator in the City Manager department. Pertaining Specifically to the General Fund: • The 2021 recurring revenue estimate of $45,251,419 is $803,119 or 1.81% greater than the 2020 proposed amended budget of $44,448,300. The 2021 amount is $3,030,381 or 6.28% less than the adopted 2020 budget estimate. • The 2021 recurring expenditure proposal of$45,101,466 is $2,203,341 or 5.14% greater than the 2020 proposed amended appropriation of $42,898,125. The 2021 amount is $1,879,480 or 4.35% greater than the adopted 2020 budget amount. • Budgeted recurring revenues currently exceed recurring expenditures by $149,953 or 0.33% of recurring revenues. • Nonrecurring expenditures total $2,151,300 and include: o $212,800 for Information Technology expenditures including: ■ $10,000 to replace outdated copiers ■ $159,000 for server upgrades and to replace the card access systems at CenterPlace and the Maintenance Shop ■ $43,800 for software upgrades and Laserfiche workflow o $78,900 for various Public Safety items including: ■ $37,500 for the replacement of handguns (split 50% with the County) ■ $11,400 for a radar trailer ■ $20,000 to replace the access control gate at the Precinct ■ $10,000 to replace the fire panel at the Precinct o $1,859,600 transfer out to the Street O&M Fund #101 to cover the deficit in recurring expenditures exceeding recurring revenues in that fund • The total of 2021 recurring and nonrecurring expenditures exceeds total revenues by $2,001,347. • The projected ending fund balance for the General Fund at the end of 2021 is currently $32,936,464 or 73.03% of recurring expenditures. 2 Housing & Homeless Services Coordinator Position: • The prospect of creating a new Housing & Homeless Services division was discussed at the Budget Workshop on August 4, 2020. During that discussion, it was determined that Council did not wish to establish a new division at this time; however, Council asked staff to research the possibility of repurposing a current vacant position for this use in order to meet immediate City needs in this area. • Staff determined that a vacant Engineer position could be repurposed for this use. The Engineer position has been budgeted 50/50 in the Engineering division and Street Capital Projects. This position will be converted to a Housing & Homeless Services Coordinator in the City Manager Department beginning in the fourth-quarter of 2020 and a full year in the current 2021 proposed budget. This will result in an increase to the City Manager's budget with a corresponding reduction in the Engineering budget from what was seen on August 4t". This has not changed since the September 8th presentation to Council. Other Funds: 2021 Budget appropriations (expenditures) in the other funds total $50,692,778 as follows: Fund Fund 2021 Number Name Appropriation 101 Street Fund 5,567,200 103 Paths and Trails Fund 0 104 Hotel/ Motel Tax- Tourism Facilities Fund 0 105 Hotel/ Motel Tax Fund 710,000 106 Solid Waste Fund 1,737,000 107 PEG Fund 73,000 108 Affordable & Supportive Housing Sales Tax Fund 0 120 CenterPlace Operating Reserve Fund 0 121 Service Level Stabilization Reserve Fund 0 122 Winter Weather Reserve Fund 500,000 204 Debt Service Fund 1,043,850 301 REET 1 Capital Projects Fund 1,224,673 302 REET 2 Capital Projects Fund 3,698,125 303 Street Capital Projects Fund 8,876,315 309 Parks Capital Projects Fund 1,120,305 310 Civic Facilities Capital Projects Fund 0 311 Pavement Preservation Fund 4,726,350 312 Capital Reserve Fund 2,050,524 314 Railroad Grade Separation Projects Fund 13,796,320 402 Stormwater Management Fund 2,626,007 403 Aquifer Protection Area Fund 2,378,109 501 Equipment Rental and Replacement Fund 140,000 502 Risk Management Fund 425,000 50,692,778 Primary sources of revenues in these other funds include: • Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax revenue that is collected by the State and remitted to the Street Fund is anticipated to be $2,062,000. 3 • Telephone Tax revenues remitted to the City that supports Street Fund operations and maintenance are anticipated to be $1,431,000. • Real Estate Excise Tax (REET) revenues that are in large part used to match grant financed street projects are anticipated to total $2,000,000. • Hotel / Motel Tax revenues that are dedicated to the promotion of visitors and tourism are anticipated to be $559,000 ($346,000 in the Hotel/Motel Tax Fund #105 and $213,000 in the Hotel/Motel Tax—Tourism Facilities Fund #104). • Stormwater Management Fees that are estimated at $1,900,000. • Aquifer Protection Area Fees are estimated at $460,000. Funding Challenges: • The COVID-19 Pandemic continues to impact revenues and as a consequence, as we receive updated information on tax collections and revenue sources we anticipate there may be changes to revenue projections as we progress through this 2021 Budget development process. You'll note there has been a relatively material change to estimates since the August 4th Budget Workshop in one revenue source. o We've received two additional months of sales tax receipts since information was prepared for the Workshop. Overall, receipts are currently tracking with what was received at this time during 2019. However, sources at the state and national level as well as observations of the current economy make it unclear as to whether the current level of collections is sustainable or will decrease in future months. In response to new information, staff has increased sales tax estimates to reflect a 10% decrease from 2019 collections rather than the 20% that was used in the estimates at the Budget Workshop. We will continue to monitor collections and adjust accordingly. o Other revenues are tracking with estimates that were given at the Budget Workshop and have not been adjusted since that time. • Declining revenues in the Street O&M Fund #101 are impacting our ability to deliver historic levels of service. Fund #101 is dependent upon motor vehicle fuel tax revenues and telephone utility tax revenues. o Motor vehicle fuel taxes have increased slightly due to recent State legislation; however, they are generally flat or declining in recent years due to improvements in vehicle fuel mileage. o Telephone utility taxes have been declining at an average of 5.90% per year from 2009 through 2019. We believe the decline is primarily due to the elimination of land lines by individual households. The revenues from this tax reached a high of$3.1 million in 2009 (the year the tax was implemented) and is currently estimated to generate $1.4 million in 2021. • Balancing the cost of pavement preservation against other transportation and infrastructure needs. o Pavement Preservation Fund #311 is relying more heavily on REET revenues due to an elimination of the contribution from the Street Fund #101 related to declining revenues and an elimination of contributions from the Civic Facility Replacement Fund #123. The fund balance in Fund #123 was entirely depleted at the end of 2016, and the fund was closed during 2017. o Reliance on REET revenues to fund pavement preservation in Fund #311 limits the City's ability to provide match funding for State and Federal grants received for other street projects. 4 o Railroad grade separation projects (overpasses and underpasses) are exceptionally expensive endeavors and are largely beyond the City's ability to finance through existing sources of revenue. The City has secured funding for the Barker Rd. Grade Separation project; however, funding is still needed for other grade separation projects within the City. OPTIONS: State law requires a public hearing on 2021 estimated revenues and expenditures. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: As the purpose of the public hearing is to gather input from the public in regard to the 2021 Budget, no action is requested at this time. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Given that the budget is not scheduled to be adopted by the Council until November 24, 2020, it is possible the figures may be modified as we refine estimates of revenues and expenditures. STAFF CONTACT: Chelsie Taylor, Finance Director ATTACHMENTS: • Power Point presentation. • Assorted 2021 Budget information: o Pages 1-13 Budget summary information with detail by fund. o Page 14-15 General Fund budget change from August 4 to September 22. o Page 16 General Fund revenue and expenditure line-item changes. o Page 17-20 General Fund department changes from 2020 to 2021. o Page 21 Full-time equivalent employees (FTEs). 5 City of Spokane Valley 2021 Budget Discussion Public Hearing #1 2021 Estimated Revenues and Expenditures September 22, 2020 2021 Budget Summary All Funds Total appropriations across all City Funds of $97.9 million including : $47.3 million in the General Fund which is comprised of $45. 1 million recurring and $2.2 million nonrecurring. $50.7 million spread across 23 additional funds. $32.5 million in capital expenditures. 2 2021 Budget Summary All Funds FTE count proposed to be 95.25 employees in 2021 , which is the same as 2020. However, two positions transitioned between departments. There is one vacant position in Economic Development being repurposed to Engineering due to workload and one vacant Engineer position that was budgeted 50/50 between Engineering and Street Capital Projects being repurposed to a Housing & Homeless Services Coordinator in the City Manager department. 3 General Fund — Housing & Homeless Services At the Budget Workshop, Council decided against creating a new Housing & Homeless Services division at this time but asked about the ability to repurpose a vacant position. Staff determined that a vacant Engineer position could be repurposed for this use. The Engineer position was budgeted 50/50 in the Engineering division and Street Capital Projects. This will also be included in a future budget amendment for a partial year in 2020. 4 General Fund REVENUES: Total recurring 2021 revenues of $45,251 ,419 as compared to $44,448,300 in 2020 for an increase of $803, 119 or 1 .81 %. ■ All revenue estimates are based upon a combination of historical collections and future projections with some increasing and others decreasing. 2 largest sources are Sales Tax and Property Tax which are collectively estimated to account for $37,686,400 or 83.28% of 2021 General Fund recurring revenues. 5 General Fund General sales tax collections are estimated at $22,220,000, an increase of $436,000 or 2.00% over the 2020 Budget. In response to new information , staff has increased sales tax estimates to reflect a 10% decrease from 2019 collections rather than the 20% that was used in the estimates at the Budget Workshop. We will continue to monitor collections and adjust accordingly. 6 General Fund Property Tax levy is not proposed to include the 1 increase authorized by State law. 2021 Levy is estimated at $12,549,200 Levy assumes we start with the 2020 levy of $12,399,226 + estimated new construction of $150,000 General Fund EXPENDITURES: . 2021 recurring expenditure proposal of $45, 101 ,466 as compared to $42,898, 125 in 2020 proposed amended budget for an increase of $2,203,341 or 5. 14% . • The 2021 amount is 1 ,879,480 or 4.35% greater than the adopted 2020 budget. — • Recurring revenues currently exceed recurring expenditures by $ 149,953 or 0.33% of recurring revenues. 8 General Fund ■ Nonrecurring expenditures total $2, 151 ,300 and include: $212,800 of IT related capital replacements $78,900 for various Public Safety items including $37,500 for the replacement of handguns (split 50% with the County) • $11 ,400 for a radar trailer • $20,000 to replace the access control gate at the Precinct $10,000 to replace the fire panel at the Precinct $1 ,859,600 transfer out to the Street O&M Fund #101 to cover the deficit in recurring expenditures exceeding recurring revenues in that fund 9 General Fund The total of 2021 recurring and nonrecurring expenditures exceeds total revenues by $2,001 ,347. ■ Projected fund balance at the end of 2021 is currently $32,936,464 or 73.03% of recurring expenditures. 10 Other Funds Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax revenue that is collected by the State and remitted to the Street Fund is anticipated to be $2,062,000 Telephone Taxes that are remitted to the City and support Street Fund operations and maintenance are anticipated to be $ 1 ,431 ,000 _ Real Estate Excise Tax (REET) revenues that are in large part used to match grant financed street projects are anticipated to total $2,000,000 Other Funds Hotel/Motel Tax revenues that are dedicated to the promotion of visitors and tourism are anticipated to be $559,000 Stormwater Management Fees of $1 ,900,000 ■ Aquifer Protection Area fees of $460,000 f Grant Revenues of $18,626,060: Fund #303 — Street Capital Projects - $6,843,308 Fund #309 — Parks Capital Projects - $480,530 Fund #314 — RR Grade Separation Projects - $11 ,508,819 Fund #402 — Stormwater Fund - $100,000 Fund #403 — Aquifer Protection Area Fund - $2,122,045 12 Other Funds — Challenges COVID-19 Pandemic revenue impacts ■ Declining revenues in the Street O&M Fund #101 that will impact our ability to deliver historic levels of service. Telephone utility tax revenues — - Balancing the cost of pavement preservation against other transportation and infrastructure needs. Use of REET for pavement preservation limits availability of funds for grant matching Railroad grade separation projects 13 Future Council Budget Discussions Oct. 13 — City Manager presentation of Preliminary 2021 Budget • Oct. 27 — Public hearing #2 on 2021 Budget • Nov. 10 — First reading of ordinance adopting 2021 Budget. ■ Nov. 24 — Public hearing #3 and second reading of ordinance adopting 2021 Budget. 14 P:\Finance\2021 Budget\Budget Worksheets\RCAs and Intros and PowerPoint Presentations\2020 09 22\budget summary as of 2020 09 22 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 9/22/2020 2021 Budget 2020 2021 Difference Between As Proposed As Proposed 2020 and 2021 Adopted Amendment Amended Budget $ 0/0 #001 -GENERAL FUND RECURRING ACTIVITY Revenues Property Tax 12,432,400 0 12,432,400 12,549,200 116,800 0.94% Sales Tax 24,632,900 (2,848,900) 21,784,000 22,220,000 436,000 2.00% Sales Tax-Public Safety 1,162,600 (128,600) 1,034,000 1,054,800 20,800 2.01% Sales Tax-Criminal Justice 2,052,300 (226,300) 1,826,000 1,862,400 36,400 1.99% Gambling Tax and Leasehold Excise Tax 384,000 (90,000) 294,000 384,000 90,000 30.61% Franchise Fees/Business Registration 1,220,000 0 1,220,000 1,215,000 (5,000) (0.41%) State Shared Revenues 1,688,200 0 1,688,200 1,760,000 71,800 4.25% Fines and Forfeitures/Public Safety 1,077,700 0 1,077,700 1,010,200 (67,500) (6.26%) Community and Public Works 2,129,800 0 2,129,800 1,908,719 (221,081) (10.38%) Recreation Program Revenues 659,200 (539,700) 119,500 643,600 524,100 438.58% Miscellaneous Department Revenue 21,000 0 21,000 21,000 0 0.00% Miscellaneous&Investment Interest 791,700 0 791,700 592,500 (199,200) (25.16%) Transfers in-#105(h/m tax-CP advertising) 30,000 0 30,000 30,000 0 0.00% Total Recurring Revenues 48,281,800 (3,833,500) 44,448,300 45,251,419 803,119 1.81% Expenditures City Council 622,187 0 622,187 631,566 9,379 1.51% City Manager 997,882 33,300 1,031,182 1,158,089 126,907 12.31% City Attorney 707,942 0 707,942 718,593 10,651 1.50% Public Safety 26,599,214 274,489 26,873,703 28,101,615 1,227,912 4.57% Deputy City Manager 277,187 0 277,187 284,844 7,657 2.76% Finance/IT 1,478,523 0 1,478,523 1,500,659 22,136 1.50% Human Resources 313,316 0 313,316 318,540 5,224 1.67% City Hall Operations and Maintenance 296,270 0 296,270 301,093 4,823 1.63% Community&Public Works-Engineering 1,971,731 (16,650) 1,955,081 2,098,642 143,561 7.34% Community&Public Works-Economic Dev 1,119,829 0 1,119,829 1,045,762 (74,067) (6.61%) Community&Public Works-Building&Planninc 2,420,414 0 2,420,414 2,487,066 66,652 2.75% Parks&Rec-Administration 352,227 (15,000) 337,227 356,467 19,240 5.71% Parks&Rec-Maintenance 917,500 0 917,500 940,003 22,503 2.45% Parks&Rec-Recreation 325,921 (83,000) 242,921 328,534 85,613 35.24% Parks&Rec-Aquatics 501,853 (369,000) 132,853 510,053 377,200 283.92% Parks&Rec-Senior Center 43,447 0 43,447 35,403 (8,044) (18.51%) Parks&Rec-CenterPlace 965,359 (148,000) 817,359 972,214 154,855 18.95% General Government 1,321,111 0 1,321,111 1,297,380 (23,731) (1.80%) Transfers out-#204(2016 LTGO debt service) 401,450 0 401,450 401,500 50 0.01% Transfers out-#309(park capital projects) 160,000 0 160,000 160,000 0 0.00% Transfers out-#311 (pavement preservation) 982,023 0 982,023 991,843 9,820 1.00% Transfers out-#501 (CenterPlace kitchen reserve) 36,600 0 36,600 36,600 0 0.00% Transfers out-#502(insurance premium) 410,000 0 410,000 425,000 15,000 3.66% Total Recurring Expenditures 43,221,986 (323,861) 42,898,125 45,101,466 2,203,341 5.14% Recurring Revenues Over(Under) Recurring Expenditures 5,059,814 (3,509,639) 1,550,175 149,953 Page 1 of 21 P:\Finance\2021 Budget\Budget Worksheets\RCAs and Intros and PowerPoint Presentations\2020 09 22\budget summary as of 2020 09 22 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 9/22/2020 2021 Budget 2020 2021 Difference Between As Proposed As Proposed 2020 and 2021 Adopted Amendment Amended Budget $ 0/0 #001 -GENERAL FUND-continued NONRECURRING ACTIVITY Revenues Grant Proceeds 70,000 4,477,400 4,547,400 0 (4,547,400) (100.00%) Reimbursement of chamber wall repairs 0 500,000 500,000 0 (500,000) (100.00%) Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% Total Nonrecurring Revenues 70,000 4,977,400 5,047,400 0 (5,047,400) (100.00%) Expenditures General Government-IT capital replacements 190,000 0 190,000 212,800 22,800 12.00% City Manager(office furniture for Housing Sery empl 0 5,000 5,000 0 (5,000) (100.00%) Public Safety(full facility generator) 0 58,310 58,310 0 (58,310) (100.00%) Public Safety(carpet&workstation replacement) 15,000 0 15,000 0 (15,000) (100.00%) Public Safety(replace HVAC units at Precinct) 0 60,000 60,000 0 (60,000) (100.00%) Public Safety(replace handguns) 0 0 0 37,500 37,500 0.00% Public Safety(radar trailer) 0 0 0 11,400 11,400 0.00% Public Safety(Precinct access control gate) 0 0 0 20,000 20,000 0.00% Public Safety(Precinct fire panel replacement) 0 0 0 10,000 10,000 0.00% City Hall chamber east wall repairs 0 500,000 500,000 0 (500,000) (100.00%) Economic Dev(CERB Apple way Trail Study) 0 25,000 25,000 0 (25,000) (100.00%) Economic Dev(Commerce Housing Action Plan) 0 100,000 100,000 0 (100,000) (100.00%) Building (equipment for new Code Enf. Officer) 13,700 0 13,700 0 (13,700) (100.00%) Parks&Rec(carpet at CenterPlace) 9,500 0 9,500 0 (9,500) (100.00%) General Government(City Hall generator) 0 44,993 44,993 0 (44,993) (100.00%) COVID-19 related expenditures 0 4,352,400 4,352,400 0 (4,352,400) (100.00%) Transfers out-#101 (Street Fund operations) 0 350,200 350,200 1,859,600 1,509,400 431.01% Transfers out-#122(replenish reserve) 0 500,000 500,000 0 (500,000) (100.00%) Transfers out-#309(Browns Park 2019 Impr) 0 121,298 121,298 0 (121,298) (100.00%) Transfers out-#309(CenterPlace west lawn) 1,500,000 401,581 1,901,581 0 (1,901,581) (100.00%) Transfers out-#309(CenterPlace roof repairs) 0 810,000 810,000 0 (810,000) (100.00%) Transfers out-#312('18 fund bal>50%) 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% Transfers out-#501 (new Code Enf.Vehicle) 30,000 0 30,000 0 (30,000) (100.00%) Total Nonrecurring Expenditures 1,758,200 7,328,782 9,086,982 2,151,300 (6,935,682) (76.33%) Nonrecurring Revenues Over(Under) Nonrecurring Expenditures (1,688,200) (2,351,382) (4,039,582) (2,151,300) Excess(Deficit)of Total Revenues Over(Under)Total Expenditures 3,371,614 (5,861,021) (2,489,407) (2,001,347) Beginning unrestricted fund balance 37,427,218 37,427,218 34,937,811 Ending unrestricted fund balance 40,798,832 34,937,811 32,936,464 Fund balance as a percent of recurring expenditures 94.39% 81.44% 73.03% Page 2 of 21 P:\Finance\2021 Budget\Budget Worksheets\RCAs and Intros and PowerPoint Presentations\2020 09 22\budget summary as of 2020 09 22 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 9/22/2020 2021 Budget 2020 2021 Difference Between As Proposed As Proposed 2020 and 2021 Adopted Amendment Amended Budget $ 0/0 SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS #101 -STREET FUND RECURRING ACTIVITY Revenues Utility Tax 1,521,000 0 1,521,000 1,431,000 (90,000) (5.92%) Motor Vehicle Fuel (Gas)Tax 2,046,700 (331,700) 1,715,000 2,062,000 347,000 20.23% Multimodal Transportation Revenue 131,500 (18,500) 113,000 130,600 17,600 15.58% Right-of-Way Maintenance Fee 70,000 0 70,000 70,000 0 0.00% Investment Interest 17,000 0 17,000 4,000 (13,000) (76.47%) Miscellaneous 10,000 0 10,000 10,000 0 0.00% Total Recurring Revenues 3,796,200 (350,200) 3,446,000 3,707,600 261,600 7.59% Expenditures Wages/Benefits/Payroll Taxes 1,059,613 0 1,059,613 1,127,920 68,307 6.45% Supplies 146,050 0 146,050 156,050 10,000 6.85% Services&Charges 2,426,467 0 2,426,467 2,525,828 99,361 4.09% Snow Operations 543,776 0 543,776 751,652 207,876 38.23% Intergovernmental Payments 922,000 0 922,000 935,000 13,000 1.41% Vehicle rentals-#501 (non-plow vehicle rental) 14,500 0 14,500 10,250 (4,250) (29.31%) Vehicle rentals-#501 (plow replace.) 48,500 0 48,500 60,500 12,000 24.74% Total Recurring Expenditures 5,160,906 0 5,160,906 5,567,200 406,294 7.87% Recurring Revenues Over(Under) Recurring Expenditures (1,364,706) (350,200) (1,714,906) (1,859,600) NONRECURRING ACTIVITY Revenues Transfers in-#101 0 350,200 350,200 1,859,600 1,509,400 431.01% Transfers in-#312 1,364,706 0 1,364,706 0 (1,364,706) (100.00%) Total Nonrecurring Revenues 1,364,706 350,200 1,714,906 1,859,600 144,694 8.44% Expenditures Spare traffic signal equipment 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% Total Nonrecurring Expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% Nonrecurring Revenues Over(Under) Nonrecurring Expenditures 1,364,706 350,200 1,714,906 1,859,600 Excess(Deficit)of Total Revenues Over(Under)Total Expenditures 0 0 0 0 Beginning fund balance 556,265 556,265 556,265 Ending fund balance 556,265 556,265 556,265 #103-PATHS&TRAILS FUND Revenues Motor Vehicle Fuel (Gas)Tax 8,600 0 8,600 8,700 100 1.16% Investment Interest 400 0 400 200 (200) (50.00%) Total revenues 9,000 0 9,000 8,900 (100) (1.11%) Expenditures Transfers out 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% Total expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% Revenues over(under)expenditures 9,000 9,000 8,900 Beginning fund balance 14,115 14,115 23,115 Ending fund balance 23,115 23,115 32,015 Page 3 of 21 P:\Finance\2021 Budget\Budget Worksheets\RCAs and Intros and PowerPoint Presentations\2020 09 22\budget summary as of 2020 09 22 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 9/22/2020 2021 Budget 2020 2021 Difference Between As Proposed As Proposed 2020 and 2021 Adopted Amendment Amended Budget $ 0/0 SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS-continued #104-HOTEL 1 MOTEL TAX-TOURISM FACILITIES FUND Revenues Hotel/Motel Tax 420,000 (207,000) 213,000 213,000 0 0.00% Investment Interest 24,000 0 24,000 24,000 0 0.00% Transfers in-#105 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% Total revenues 444,000 (207,000) 237,000 237,000 0 0.00% Expenditures Capital Outlay 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% Total expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% Revenues over(under)expenditures 444,000 237,000 237,000 Beginning fund balance 2,690,945 2,690,945 2,927,945 Ending fund balance 3,134,945 2,927,945 3,164,945 #105-HOTEL 1 MOTEL TAX FUND Revenues Hotel/Motel Tax 650,000 (304,000) 346,000 346,000 0 0.00% Investment Interest 6,000 0 6,000 6,000 0 0.00% Total revenues 656,000 (304,000) 352,000 352,000 0 0.00% Expenditures Transfers out-#001 30,000 0 30,000 30,000 0 0.00% Transfers out-#104 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% Tourism Promotion 795,000 (476,000) 319,000 680,000 361,000 113.17% Total expenditures 825,000 (476,000) 349,000 710,000 361,000 103.44% Revenues over(under)expenditures (169,000) 3,000 (358,000) Beginning fund balance 518,240 518,240 521,240 Ending fund balance 349,240 521,240 163,240 #106-SOLID WASTE FUND Revenues Solid Waste Administrative Fee 225,000 0 225,000 225,000 0 0.00% Solid Waste Road Wear Fee 1,500,000 0 1,500,000 1,500,000 0 0.00% Investment Interest 12,000 0 12,000 12,000 0 0.00% Total revenues 1,737,000 0 1,737,000 1,737,000 0 0.00% Expenditures Education/Contract Admin 237,000 0 237,000 237,000 0 0.00% Transfers out-#311 1,500,000 13,532 1,513,532 1,500,000 (13,532) (0.89%) Total expenditures 1,737,000 13,532 1,750,532 1,737,000 (13,532) (0.77%) Revenues over(under)expenditures 0 (13,532) 0 Beginning fund balance 540,182 540,182 526,650 Ending fund balance 540,182 526,650 526,650 Page 4 of 21 P:\Finance\2021 Budget\Budget Worksheets\RCAs and Intros and PowerPoint Presentations\2020 09 22\budget summary as of 2020 09 22 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 9/22/2020 2021 Budget 2020 2021 Difference Between As Proposed As Proposed 2020 and 2021 Adopted Amendment Amended Budget $ 0/0 SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS-continued #107-PEG FUND Revenues Comcast PEG contribution 79,000 0 79,000 79,000 0 0.00% Investment Interest 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% Total revenues 79,000 0 79,000 79,000 0 0.00% Expenditures PEG Reimbursement-CMTV 39,500 0 39,500 39,500 0 0.00% Capital Outlay 45,500 0 45,500 33,500 (12,000) (26.37%) Total expenditures 85,000 0 85,000 73,000 (12,000) (14.12%) Revenues over(under)expenditures (6,000) (6,000) 6,000 Beginning fund balance 128,255 128,255 122,255 Ending fund balance 122,255 122,255 128,255 #108-AFFORDABLE&SUPPORTIVE HOUSING SALES TAX FUND Revenues Affordable&Supportive Housing Sales Tax 0 144,750 144,750 193,000 48,250 33.33% Investment Interest 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% Total revenues 0 144,750 144,750 193,000 48,250 33.33% Expenditures Professional Services 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% Total expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% Revenues over(under)expenditures 0 144,750 193,000 Beginning fund balance 0 0 144,750 Ending fund balance 0 144,750 337,750 #120-CENTER PLACE OPERATING RESERVE FUND Revenues Investment Interest 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% Total revenues 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% Expenditures Operations 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% Total expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% Revenues over(under)expenditures 0 0 0 Beginning fund balance 300,000 300,000 300,000 Ending fund balance 300,000 300,000 300,000 Page 5 of 21 P:\Finance\2021 Budget\Budget Worksheets\RCAs and Intros and PowerPoint Presentations\2020 09 22\budget summary as of 2020 09 22 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 9/22/2020 2021 Budget 2020 2021 Difference Between As Proposed As Proposed 2020 and 2021 Adopted Amendment Amended Budget $ 0/0 SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS-continued #121 -SERVICE LEVEL STABILIZATION RESERVE FUND Revenues Investment Interest 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% Total revenues 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% Expenditures Operations 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% Total expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% Revenues over(under)expenditures 0 0 0 Beginning fund balance 5,500,000 5,500,000 5,500,000 Ending fund balance 5,500,000 5,500,000 5,500,000 #122-WINTER WEATHER RESERVE FUND Revenues Investment Interest 5,400 0 5,400 1,900 (3,500) (64.81%) Transfers in-#001 0 500,000 500,000 0 (500,000) (100.00%) Total revenues 5,400 500,000 505,400 1,900 (503,500) (99.62%) Expenditures Street maintenance expenditures 500,000 0 500,000 500,000 0 0.00% Transfers out-#101 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% Total expenditures 500,000 0 500,000 500,000 0 0.00% Revenues over(under)expenditures (494,600) 5,400 (498,100) Beginning fund balance 23,336 23,336 528,736 Ending fund balance (471,264) 28,736 30,636 DEBT SERVICE FUNDS #204-LTGO BOND DEBT SERVICE FUND Revenues Spokane Public Facilities District 459,500 0 459,500 480,800 21,300 4.64% Transfers in-#001 401,450 0 401,450 401,500 50 0.01% Transfers in-#301 80,375 0 80,375 80,775 400 0.50% Transfers in-#302 80,375 0 80,375 80,775 400 0.50% Total revenues 1,021,700 0 1,021,700 1,043,850 22,150 2.17% Expenditures Debt Service Payments-CenterPlace 459,500 0 459,500 480,800 21,300 4.64% Debt Service Payments-Roads 160,750 0 160,750 161,550 800 0.50% Debt Service Payments-City Hall 401,450 0 401,450 401,500 50 0.01% Total expenditures 1,021,700 0 1,021,700 1,043,850 22,150 2.17% Revenues over(under)expenditures 0 0 0 Beginning fund balance 0 0 0 Ending fund balance 0 0 0 Page 6 of 21 P:\Finance\2021 Budget\Budget Worksheets\RCAs and Intros and PowerPoint Presentations\2020 09 22\budget summary as of 2020 09 22 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 9/22/2020 2021 Budget 2020 2021 Difference Between As Proposed As Proposed 2020 and 2021 Adopted Amendment Amended Budget $ 0/0 CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS #301 -REET 1 CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND Revenues REET 1 -Taxes 1,000,000 0 1,000,000 1,000,000 0 0.00% Investment Interest 35,000 0 35,000 25,000 (10,000) (28.57%) Total revenues 1,035,000 0 1,035,000 1,025,000 (10,000) (0.97%) Expenditures Transfers out-#204 80,375 0 80,375 80,775 400 0.50% Transfers out-#303 1,089,148 (216,543) 872,605 316,620 (555,985) (63.72%) Transfers out-#311 (pavement preservation) 772,639 0 772,639 827,278 54,639 7.07% Transfers out-#314(Barker Grade Separation) 49,041 819,967 869,008 0 (869,008) (100.00%) Total expenditures 1,991,203 603,424 2,594,627 1,224,673 (1,369,954) (52.80%) Revenues over(under)expenditures (956,203) (1,559,627) (199,673) Beginning fund balance 2,798,194 2,798,194 1,238,567 Ending fund balance 1,841,991 1,238,567 1,038,894 #302-REET 2 CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND Revenues REET 2-Taxes 1,000,000 0 1,000,000 1,000,000 0 0.00% Investment Interest 35,000 0 35,000 25,000 (10,000) (28.57%) Total revenues 1,035,000 0 1,035,000 1,025,000 (10,000) (0.97%) Expenditures Transfers out-#204 80,375 0 80,375 80,775 400 0.50% Transfers out-#303 404,318 113,881 518,199 1,662,684 1,144,485 220.86% Transfers out-#311 (pavement preservation) 772,638 0 772,638 827,279 54,641 7.07% Transfers out-#314 0 0 0 1,127,387 1,127,387 0.00% Total expenditures 1,257,331 113,881 1,371,212 3,698,125 2,326,913 169.70% Revenues over(under)expenditures (222,331) (336,212) (2,673,125) Beginning fund balance 4,391,870 4,391,870 4,055,658 Ending fund balance 4,169,539 4,055,658 1,382,533 Page 7 of 21 P:\Finance\2021 Budget\Budget Worksheets\RCAs and Intros and PowerPoint Presentations\2020 09 22\budget summary as of 2020 09 22 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 9/22/2020 2021 Budget 2020 2021 Difference Between As Proposed As Proposed 2020 and 2021 Adopted Amendment Amended Budget $ 0/0 CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS-continued #303-STREET CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND Revenues Grant Proceeds 6,596,718 (656,213) 5,940,505 6,843,308 902,803 15.20% Developer 110,499 1,200,560 1,311,059 53,703 (1,257,356) (95.90%) Transfers in-#301 1,089,148 (216,543) 872,605 316,620 (555,985) (63.72%) Transfers in-#302 404,318 113,881 518,199 1,662,684 1,144,485 220.86% Transfers in-#312-Barker Corridor 39,512 455,779 495,291 0 (495,291) (100.00%) Transfers in-#312-Garland Ave 75,000 1,211,436 1,286,436 0 (1,286,436) (100.00%) Total revenues 8,315,195 2,108,900 10,424,095 8,876,315 (1,547,780) (14.85%) Expenditures 205 Sprague/Barker Intersections Improvement 195,499 0 195,499 329,453 133,954 68.52% 249 Sullivan/Wellesley Intersection 100,000 50,000 150,000 1,020,522 870,522 580.35% 259 N. Sullivan Corridor ITS Project 810,232 111,117 921,349 0 (921,349) (100.00%) 267 Mission Ave Sidewalk 19,852 116,223 136,075 11,310 (124,765) (91.69%) 273 Barker/I-90 Interchange 90,000 478,655 568,655 0 (568,655) (100.00%) 275 Barker Rd Widening-River to Euclid 3,729,143 (1,750,748) 1,978,395 1,132,320 (846,075) (42.77%) 276 Barker Rd Widening-Euclid to Garland 0 380,269 380,269 0 (380,269) (100.00%) 285 Indiana Ave Pres-Evergreen to Sullivan 300,000 54,060 354,060 7,210 (346,850) (97.96%) 291 Adams Sidewalk Infill 444,645 0 444,645 0 (444,645) (100.00%) 293 2018 CSS Citywide Reflective Signal BP 99,000 0 99,000 74,250 (24,750) (25.00%) 294 Citywide Reflective Signal Post Panels 47,775 0 47,775 17,875 (29,900) (62.59%) 295 Garland Ave Construction 150,000 2,342,371 2,492,371 0 (2,492,371) (100.00%) 299 Argonne Rd Concrete Pvmt Indiana to Mont 32,000 0 32,000 2,392,450 2,360,450 7376.41% 300 Pines and Mission Intersection Improvement 516,000 0 516,000 498,000 (18,000) (3.49%) 301 Park and Mission Intersection Improvements 0 152,992 152,992 693,000 540,008 352.96% 302 Ella Sidewalk-Broadway to Alki 371,760 0 371,760 0 (371,760) (100.00%) 303 S. Conklin Sidewalk 124,125 0 124,125 0 (124,125) (100.00%) 310 Sullivan Rd Overcrossing UP RR Deck Repl 0 337,625 337,625 317,625 (20,000) (5.92%) 313 Barker Rd/Union Pacific Crossing 0 121,500 121,500 1,312,500 1,191,000 980.25% 318 Wilbur Sidewalk-Boone to Mission 0 0 0 50,000 50,000 0.00% 320 Sullivan Preservation-Sprague to 8th 0 0 0 19,800 19,800 0.00% 069 Park Rd Reconstruction#2(Repay Grant Funds) 285,164 (285,164) 0 0 0 0.00% Contingency 1,000,000 0 1,000,000 1,000,000 0 0.00% Total expenditures 8,315,195 2,108,900 10,424,095 8,876,315 (1,547,780) (14.85%) Revenues over(under)expenditures 0 0 0 Beginning fund balance 67,402 67,402 67,402 Ending fund balance 67,402 67,402 67,402 Note: Work performed for pavement preservation projects out of the Street Capital Projects Fund is for items such as sidewalk upgrades that the were bid with the pavement preservation work. Page 8 of 21 P:\Finance\2021 Budget\Budget Worksheets\RCAs and Intros and PowerPoint Presentations\2020 09 22\budget summary as of 2020 09 22 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 9/22/2020 2021 Budget 2020 2021 Difference Between As Proposed As Proposed 2020 and 2021 Adopted Amendment Amended Budget $ 0/0 CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS-continued #309-PARK CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND Revenues Grant Proceeds 2,500 1,603,083 1,605,583 480,530 (1,125,053) (70.07%) Transfers in-#001 1,660,000 1,332,879 2,992,879 160,000 (2,832,879) (94.65%) Transfers in-#312 7,500 111,873 119,373 565,150 445,777 373.43% Total revenues 1,670,000 3,047,835 4,717,835 1,205,680 (3,512,155) (74.44%) Expenditures 268 Appleway Trail (Evergreen to Sullivan) 5,000 1,604,376 1,609,376 0 (1,609,376) (100.00%) 296 Browns Park improvements 2019 5,000 116,298 121,298 0 (121,298) (100.00%) 304 CenterPlace west lawn improvements-Ph.2 1,500,000 401,581 1,901,581 0 (1,901,581) (100.00%) 305 CenterPlace roof repairs 0 810,000 810,000 0 (810,000) (100.00%) 314 Balfour Park frontage improvements 0 59,850 59,850 565,150 505,300 844.28% 315 Browns Park improvements 2020 0 62,995 62,995 499,805 436,810 693.40% 316 Balfour Park improvements-Ph 1 0 11,000 11,000 0 (11,000) (100.00%) Install stage fill speakers Great Room 0 0 0 6,346 6,346 0.00% Repair failed pixels Great Room 0 0 0 6,505 6,505 0.00% Reprogram Great Room AN System 0 0 0 12,499 12,499 0.00% Repair/replace siding at Mirabeau restroom 0 0 0 30,000 30,000 0.00% Total expenditures 1,510,000 3,066,100 4,576,100 1,120,305 (3,455,795) (75.52%) Revenues over(under)expenditures 160,000 141,735 85,375 Beginning fund balance 78,627 78,627 220,362 Ending fund balance 238,627 220,362 305,737 #310-CIVIC FACILITIES CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND Revenues Investment Interest 17,000 0 17,000 3,100 (13,900) (81.76%) Total revenues 17,000 0 17,000 3,100 (13,900) (81.76%) Expenditures Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% Transfers out-#312 0 16,700 16,700 0 (16,700) (100.00%) Total expenditures 0 16,700 16,700 0 (16,700) (100.00%) Revenues over(under)expenditures 17,000 300 3,100 Beginning fund balance 855,985 855,985 856,285 Ending fund balance 872,985 856,285 859,385 Note: The fund balance in#310 includes$839,281.10 paid by the Library District for 2.82 acres at the Balfour Park site. If the District does not succeed in getting a voted bond approved by October 2022 then the City may repurchase this land at the original sale price of$839,285.10. Page 9 of 21 P:\Finance\2021 Budget\Budget Worksheets\RCAs and Intros and PowerPoint Presentations\2020 09 22\budget summary as of 2020 09 22 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 9/22/2020 2021 Budget 2020 2021 Difference Between As Proposed As Proposed 2020 and 2021 Adopted Amendment Amended Budget $ 0/0 CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS-continued #311 -PAVEMENT PRESERVATION Revenues Transfers in-#001 982,023 0 982,023 991,843 9,820 1.00% Transfers in-#106 1,500,000 13,532 1,513,532 1,500,000 (13,532) (0.89%) Transfers in-#301 772,639 0 772,639 827,278 54,639 7.07% Transfers in-#302 772,638 0 772,638 827,279 54,641 7.07% Grant Proceeds 10,588 0 10,588 0 (10,588) (100.00%) Total revenues 4,037,888 13,532 4,051,420 4,146,400 94,980 2.34% Expenditures Pavement preservation 4,217,523 0 4,217,523 4,676,350 458,827 10.88% Pre-project GeoTech 50,000 0 50,000 50,000 0 0.00% Total expenditures 4,267,523 0 4,267,523 4,726,350 458,827 10.75% Revenues over(under)expenditures (229,635) (216,103) (579,950) Beginning fund balance 4,425,201 4,425,201 4,209,098 Ending fund balance 4,195,566 4,209,098 3,629,148 #312-CAPITAL RESERVE FUND Revenues Transfers in-#001 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% Transfers in-#310 0 16,700 16,700 0 (16,700) (100.00%) Investment Interest 100,000 0 100,000 100,000 0 0.00% Total revenues 100,000 16,700 116,700 100,000 (16,700) (14.31%) Expenditures Transfers out-#101 1,364,706 0 1,364,706 0 (1,364,706) (100.00%) Transfers out-#303(Barker Road Corridor) 39,512 455,779 495,291 0 (495,291) (100.00%) Transfers out-#303(Garland Ave.) 75,000 1,211,436 1,286,436 0 (1,286,436) (100.00%) Transfers out-#309(Appleway Trail-Evergreen-S 7,500 41,023 48,523 0 (48,523) (100.00%) Transfers out-#309(Balfour Park frontage improve 0 59,850 59,850 565,150 505,300 844.28% Transfers out-#309(Balfour Park frontage improve 0 11,000 11,000 0 (11,000) (100.00%) Transfers out-#314(Pines Rd Underpass) 64,192 3,308 67,500 64,192 (3,308) (4.90%) Transfers out-#314(Barker Rd Overpass) 0 0 0 411,582 411,582 0.00% Transfers out-#314(Sullivan Rd Interchange) 0 75,000 75,000 250,000 175,000 233.33% DOT Park Property Acquisition 0 0 0 759,600 759,600 0.00% Total expenditures 1,550,910 1,857,396 3,408,306 2,050,524 (1,357,782) (39.84%) Revenues over(under)expenditures (1,450,910) (3,291,606) (1,950,524) Beginning fund balance 12,936,816 12,936,816 9,645,210 Ending fund balance 11,485,906 9,645,210 7,694,686 Page 10 of 21 P:\Finance\2021 Budget\Budget Worksheets\RCAs and Intros and PowerPoint Presentations\2020 09 22\budget summary as of 2020 09 22 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 9/22/2020 2021 Budget 2020 2021 Difference Between As Proposed As Proposed 2020 and 2021 Adopted Amendment Amended Budget $ 0/0 CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS-continued #314-RAILROAD GRADE SEPARATION PROJECTS FUND Revenues Grant Proceeds 12,808,751 (9,282,373) 3,526,378 11,508,819 7,982,441 226.36% Transfers in#301 49,041 819,967 869,008 0 (869,008) (100.00%) Transfers in#302 0 0 0 1,127,387 1,127,387 0.00% Transfers in#312 64,192 78,308 142,500 725,774 583,274 409.32% Total revenues 12,921,984 (8,384,098) 4,537,886 13,361,980 8,824,094 194.45% Expenditures 143 Barker BNSF Grade Separation 11,475,292 (8,069,316) 3,405,976 9,396,870 5,990,894 175.89% 223 Pines Rd Underpass 1,562,500 (262,500) 1,300,000 4,149,450 2,849,450 219.19% 311 Sullivan Rd Interchange 0 75,000 75,000 250,000 175,000 233.33% Total expenditures 13,037,792 (8,256,816) 4,780,976 13,796,320 9,015,344 188.57% Revenues over(under)expenditures (115,808) (243,090) (434,340) Beginning fund balance 1,008,638 1,008,638 765,548 Ending fund balance 892,830 765,548 331,208 ENTERPRISE FUNDS #402-STORMWATER FUND RECURRING ACTIVITY Revenues Stormwater Management Fees 1,900,000 0 1,900,000 1,900,000 0 0.00% Investment Interest 40,000 0 40,000 40,000 0 0.00% Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% Total Recurring Revenues 1,940,000 0 1,940,000 1,940,000 0 0.00% Expenditures Wages/Benefits/Payroll Taxes 519,582 0 519,582 538,864 19,282 3.71% Supplies 14,750 0 14,750 14,750 0 0.00% Services&Charges 1,298,153 0 1,298,153 1,320,643 22,490 1.73% Intergovernmental Payments 37,500 0 37,500 45,000 7,500 20.00% Vehicle rentals-#501 14,000 0 14,000 6,750 (7,250) (51.79%) Total Recurring Expenditures 1,883,985 0 1,883,985 1,926,007 42,022 2.23% Recurring Revenues Over(Under) Recurring Expenditures 56,015 0 56,015 13,993 NONRECURRING ACTIVITY Revenues Grant Proceeds 59,828 0 59,828 100,000 40,172 67.15% Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% Total Nonrecurring Revenues 59,828 0 59,828 100,000 40,172 67.15% Expenditures Capital-various projects 500,000 0 500,000 500,000 0 0.00% Watershed studies 80,000 0 80,000 100,000 20,000 25.00% Stormwater comprehensive plan update 100,000 0 100,000 100,000 0 0.00% Total Nonrecurring Expenditures 680,000 0 680,000 700,000 20,000 2.94% Nonrecurring Revenues Over(Under) Nonrecurring Expenditures (620,172) 0 (620,172) (600,000) Excess(Deficit)of Total Revenues Over(Under)Total Expenditures , (564,157) 0 (564,157) (586,007) Beginning working capital 2,180,773 2,180,773 1,616,616 Ending working capital 1,616,616 1,616,616 1,030,609 Page 11 of 21 P:\Finance\2021 Budget\Budget Worksheets\RCAs and Intros and PowerPoint Presentations\2020 09 22\budget summary as of 2020 09 22 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 9/22/2020 2021 Budget 2020 2021 Difference Between As Proposed As Proposed 2020 and 2021 Adopted Amendment Amended Budget $ 0/0 ENTERPRISE FUNDS-continued #403-AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA Revenues Spokane County 460,000 0 460,000 460,000 0 0.00% Grant Proceeds 349,000 97,700 446,700 2,122,045 1,675,345 375.05% Investment Interest 20,000 0 20,000 15,000 (5,000) (25.00%) Total revenues 829,000 97,700 926,700 2,597,045 1,670,345 180.25% Expenditures Capital-various projects 500,000 633,571 1,133,571 2,378,109 1,244,538 109.79% Total expenditures 500,000 633,571 1,133,571 2,378,109 1,244,538 109.79% Revenues over(under)expenditures 329,000 (206,871) 218,936 Beginning working capital 2,118,299 2,118,299 1,911,428 Ending working capital 2,447,299 1,911,428 2,130,364 INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS #501 -ER&R FUND Revenues Vehicle rentals-#001 28,000 0 28,000 31,300 3,300 11.79% Vehicle rentals-#101 14,500 0 14,500 10,250 (4,250) (29.31%) Vehicle rentals-#101 (plow replace.) 48,500 0 48,500 60,500 12,000 24.74% Vehicle rentals-#402 14,000 0 14,000 6,750 (7,250) (51.79%) Transfers in-#001 (CenterPlace kitchen reserve) 36,600 0 36,600 36,600 0 0.00% Transfers in-#001 (Code Enforcement Vehicle) 30,000 0 30,000 0 (30,000) (100.00%) Investment Interest 19,000 0 19,000 10,000 (9,000) (47.37%) Total revenues 190,600 0 190,600 155,400 (35,200) (18.47%) Expenditures Small tools&minor equipment 20,000 0 20,000 10,000 (10,000) (50.00%) Vehicle purchases 30,000 0 30,000 130,000 100,000 333.33% Snow plow purchase 235,000 0 235,000 0 (235,000) (100.00%) Total expenditures 285,000 0 285,000 140,000 (145,000) (50.88%) Revenues over(under)expenditures (94,400) (94,400) 15,400 Beginning working capital 1,496,093 1,496,093 1,401,693 Ending working capital 1,401,693 1,401,693 1,417,093 #502-RISK MANAGEMENT FUND Revenues Investment Interest 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% Transfers in-#001 410,000 0 410,000 425,000 15,000 3.66% Total revenues 410,000 0 410,000 425,000 15,000 3.66% Expenditures Auto&Property Insurance 410,000 0 410,000 425,000 15,000 3.66% Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% Total expenditures 410,000 0 410,000 425,000 15,000 3.66% Revenues over(under)expenditures 0 0 0 Beginning fund balance 276,004 276,004 276,004 Ending fund balance 276,004 276,004 276,004 Page 12 of 21 P:\Finance\2021 Budget\Budget Worksheets\RCAs and Intros and PowerPoint Presentations\2020 09 22\budget summary as of 2020 09 22 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 9/22/2020 2021 Budget 2020 2021 Difference Between As Proposed As Proposed 2020 and 2021 Adopted Amendment Amended Budget $ 0/0 TOTAL OF ALL FUNDS Total of Revenues for all Funds 90,026,301 (1,821,781) 88,204,520 89,432,189 Total of Expenditures for all Funds 89,998,731 6,685,609 96,684,340 97,945,544 Total grant revenues(included in total revenues) 19,897,385 (3,760,403) 16,136,982 21,054,702 Total Capital expenditures(included in total expenditures) 28,594,710 (2,284,942) 26,309,768 32,524,699 Page 13 of 21 P:\Finance\2021 Budget\Budget Worksheets\RCAs and Intros and PowerPoint Presentations\2020 09 22\budget summary as of 2020 09 22 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA I 9/22/2020 2021 Budget General Fund 2020 2020 2021 Difference Between Adopted Proposed as of $ as 2020 and 2021 Budget Amended 8/4/2020 Change revised $ 'RECURRING ACTIVITY Revenues Property Tax 12,432,400 12,432,400 12,549,200 0 12,549,200 116,800 0.94% Sales Tax 24,632,900 21,784,000 19,751,000 2,469,000 22,220,000 436,000 2.00% Sales Tax-Public Safety 1,162,600 1,034,000 938,000 116,800 1,054,800 20,800 2.01% Sales Tax-Criminal Justice 2,052,300 1,826,000 1,656,000 206,400 1,862,400 36,400 1.99% Gambling Tax and Leasehold Excise Tax 384,000 294,000 384,000 0 384,000 90,000 30.61% Franchise Fees/Business Registration 1,220,000 1,220,000 1,215,000 0 1,215,000 (5,000) (0.41%) State Shared Revenues 1,688,200 1,688,200 1,721,000 39,000 1,760,000 71,800 4.25% Fines and Forfeitures/Public Safety 1,077,700 1,077,700 1,010,200 0 1,010,200 (67,500) (6.26%) Community and Public Works 2,129,800 2,129,800 1,908,719 0 1,908,719 (221,081) (10.38%) Recreation Program Revenues 659,200 119,500 643,600 0 643,600 524,100 438.58% Miscellaneous Department Revenue 21,000 21,000 21,000 0 21,000 0 0.00% Miscellaneous&Investment Interest 791,700 791,700 592,500 0 592,500 (199,200) (25.16%) Transfers in-#105(h/m tax-CP advertising) 30,000 30,000 30,000 0 30,000 0 0.00% Total Recurring Revenues 48,281,800 44,448,300 42,420,219 2,831,200 45,251,419 803,119 1.81% Expenditures City Council 622,187 622,187 631,566 0 631,566 9,379 1.51% City Manager 997,882 1,031,182 1,017,539 140,550 1,158,089 126,907 12.31% City Attorney 707,942 707,942 718,593 0 718,593 10,651 1.50% Public Safety 26,599,214 26,873,703 28,086,615 15,000 28,101,615 1,227,912 4.57% Deputy City Manager 277,187 277,187 284,844 0 284,844 7,657 2.76% Finance/IT 1,478,523 1,478,523 1,500,659 0 1,500,659 22,136 1.50% Human Resources 313,316 313,316 318,540 0 318,540 5,224 1.67% City Hall Operations and Maintenance 296,270 296,270 301,093 0 301,093 4,823 1.63%_ Community&Public Works-Engineering 1,971,731 1,955,081 2,165,242 (66,600) 2,098,642 143,561 7.34% Net Community&Public Works-Economic Dev 1,119,829 1,119,829 1,045,762 0 1,045,762 (74,067) (6.61%) - difference Community&Public Works-Building&Plann 2,420,414 2,420,414 2,483,766 3,300 2,487,066 66,652 2.75% $136,146 Parks&Rec-Administration 352,227 337,227 356,467 0 356,467 19,240 5.71% Parks&Rec-Maintenance 917,500 917,500 940,003 0 940,003 22,503 2.45% Parks&Rec-Recreation 325,921 242,921 328,534 0 328,534 85,613 35.24% Net Parks&Rec-Aquatics 501,853 132,853 510,053 0 510,053 377,200 283.92% difference Parks&Rec-Senior Center 43,447 43,447 35,403 0 35,403 (8,044) (18.51%) $651,367 Parks&Rec-CenterPlace 965,359 817,359 972,214 0 972,214 154,855 18.95%_ General Government 1,321,111 1,321,111 1,297,380 0 1,297,380 (23,731) (1.80%) Transfers out-#204(2016 LTGO debt service) 401,450 401,450 401,500 0 401,500 50 0.01% Transfers out-#309(park capital projects) 160,000 160,000 160,000 0 160,000 0 0.00% Transfers out-#311 (pavement preservation) 982,023 982,023 991,843 0 991,843 9,820 1.00% Transfers out-#501 (CenterPlace kitchen reserve 36,600 36,600 36,600 0 36,600 0 0.00% Transfers out-#502(insurance premium) 410,000 410,000 425,000 0 425,000 15,000 3.66% Total Recurring Expenditures 43,221,986 42,898,125 45,009,216 92,250 45,101,466 2,203,341 5.14% Recurring Revenues Over(Under) Recurring Expenditures 5,059,814 1,550,175 (2,588,997) 2,738,950 149,953 Page 14 of 21 P:\Finance\2021 Budget\Budget Worksheets\RCAs and Intros and PowerPoint Presentations\2020 09 22\budget summary as of 2020 09 22 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA I 9/22/2020 2021 Budget General Fund 2020 2020 2021 Difference Between Adopted Proposed as of $ as 2020 and 2021 Budget Amended 8/4/2020 Change revised $ 'NONRECURRING ACTIVITY Revenues Grant Proceeds 70,000 4,547,400 0 0 0 (4,547,400) (100.00%) Reimbursement of chamber wall repairs 0 500,000 0 0 0 (500,000) (100.00%) Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% Total Nonrecurring Revenues 70,000 5,047,400 0 0 0 (5,047,400) (100.00%) Expenditures General Government-IT capital replacements 190,000 190,000 212,800 0 212,800 22,800 12.00% City Manager(office furniture for Housing Sery env 0 5,000 0 0 0 (5,000) (100.00%) Public Safety(full facility generator) 0 58,310 0 0 0 (58,310) (100.00%) Public Safety(carpet&workstation replacement) 15,000 15,000 0 0 0 (15,000) (100.00%) Public Safety(replace HVAC units at Precinct) 0 60,000 0 0 0 (60,000) (100.00%) Public Safety(replace handguns) 0 0 0 37,500 37,500 37,500 0.00% Public Safety(radar trailer) 0 0 0 11,400 11,400 11,400 0.00% Public Safety(Precinct access control gate) 0 0 0 20,000 20,000 20,000 0.00% Public Safety(Precinct fire panel replacement) 0 0 0 10,000 10,000 10,000 0.00% City Hall chamber east wall repairs 0 500,000 0 0 0 (500,000) (100.00%) Economic Dev(CERB Appleway Trail Study) 0 25,000 0 0 0 (25,000) (100.00%) Economic Dev(Commerce Housing Action Plan) 0 100,000 0 0 0 (100,000) (100.00%) Building(equipment for new Code Enf Officer) 13,700 13,700 0 0 0 (13,700) (100.00%) Parks&Rec(carpet at CenterPlace) 9,500 9,500 0 0 0 (9,500) (100.00%) General Government(City Hall generator) 0 44,993 0 0 0 (44,993) (100.00%) COVID-19 related expenditures 0 4,352,400 0 0 0 (4,352,400) (100.00%) Transfers out-#101 (Street Fund operations) 0 350,200 1,898,050 (38,450) 1,859,600 1,509,400 431.01% Transfers out-#122(replenish reserve) 0 500,000 0 0 0 (500,000) (100.00%) Transfers out-#309(Browns Park other) 0 121,298 0 0 0 (121,298) (100.00%) Transfers out-#309(CenterPlace west lawn) 1,500,000 1,901,581 0 0 0 (1,901,581) (100.00%) Transfers out-#309(CenterPlace roof repairs) 0 810,000 0 0 0 (810,000) (100.00%) Transfers out-#312('18 fund bal>50%) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% Transfers out-#501 (new Code Enf Vehicle) 30,000 30,000 0 0 0 (30,000) (100.00%) Total Nonrecurring Expenditures 1,758,200 9,086,982 2,110,850 40,450 2,151,300 (6,935,682) (76.33%) Nonrecurring Revenues Over(Under) Nonrecurring Expenditures (1,688,200) (4,039,582) (2,110,850) (2,151,300) Excess(Deficit)of Total Revenues Over(Under)Total Expenditures 3,371,614 (2,489,407) (4,699,847) (2,001,347) Beginning unrestricted fund balance 37,427,218 37,427,218 34,937,811 34,937,811 Ending unrestricted fund balance 40,798,832 34,937,811 71 30,237,964 32,936,464 Ending fund balance as a percent of recurring expenditures=I 67.18% I I 73.03% I Recurring Expenditures Public Safety 26,599,214 26,873,703 28,086,615 15,000 28,101,615 4.57% 62.31% All other departments 16,622,772 16,024,422 16,922,601 77,250 16,999,851 6.09% 37.69% 43,221,986 42,898,125 45,009,216 92,250 45,101,466 5.14% 100.00% Page 15 of 21 P:\Finance\2021 Budget\Budget Worksheets\RCAs and Intros and PowerPoint Presentations\2020 09 22\budget summary as of 2020 09 22 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 9/22/2020 General Fund #001 2021 Budget Worksheets - Expenditure Changes from August 4 to September 22, 2020 Line-Item Line-Item Account Budget @ Increase Budget @ Number Description 8/4/2020 (Decrease) 9/22/2020 Revenues 001.000.000.313.10.00 Sales Tax 19,751,000 2,469,000 22,220,000 001.000.000.313.15.00 Sales Tax- Public Safety 938,000 116,800 1,054,800 001.000.000.313.71.00 Sales Tax- Criminal Justice 1,656,000 206,400 1,862,400 001.000.000.336.06.21 MVET Criminal Justice- Population 31,000 1,000 32,000 001.000.000.336.06.42 Marijuana Excise Tax Distribution 110,000 (1,000) 109,000 001.000.000.336.06.94 Liquor Board Excise Tax 545,000 7,000 552,000 001.000.000.336.06.95 Liquor Board Profits 738,000 32,000 770,000 2,831,200 Expenditures City Manager 001.013.000.513.10.10.00 Wages R 664,421 86,352 750,773 001.013.000.513.10.20.00 Payroll Taxes and Benefits R 290,078 46,848 336,926 001.013.000.513.10.31.01 Office &Operating Supplies R 3,300 2,500 5,800 001.013.000.513.10.41.05 Professional Services R 20,000 2,500 22,500 001.013.000.513.10.42.03 Cell Phones R 1,740 600 2,340 001.013.000.513.10.43.01 Travel/Mileage R 11,500 500 12,000 001.013.000.513.10.49.02 Memberships R 2,900 250 3,150 001.013.000.513.10.49.04 Registrations R 2,300 1,000 3,300 140,550 Public Safety 001.016.000.521.20.35.04 Non-Capital Equipment for JAG Grant R 25,000 15,000 40,000 001.016.099.521.20.35.01 Non-Capital Equip(replace handguns) N 0 37,500 37,500 001.016.099.594.21.64.05 Machinery& Equipment(radar trailer) N 0 11,400 11,400 001.016.099.594.21.64.05 Machinery& Equip(access control gate) N 0 20,000 20,000 001.016.099.521.50.48.01 Bldg Repair& Maint(replace fire panel) N 0 10,000 10,000 93,900 Community& Public Works - Engineering 001.040.041.543.10.10.00 Wages R 865,353 (43,176) 822,177 001.040.041.543.10.20.00 Payroll Taxes and Benefits R 396,864 (23,424) 373,440 (66,600) Community& Public Works - Building 001.040.043.524.60.45.07 Interfund Vehicle Lease R 500 3,300 3,800 3,300 General Government 001.090.099.597.10.00.10 Transfers out-#101 N 1,898,050 (38,450) 1,859,600 (38,450) Total changes in General Fund expenditures 129,400 R = recurring 92,250 N = nonrecurring 40,450 132,700 Page 16 of 21 P:\Finance\2021 Budget\Budget Worksheets\RCAs and Intros and PowerPoint Presentations\2020 09 22\budget summary as of 2020 09 22 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 2021 Budget General Fund Department Changes from 2020 to 2021 Difference Between 2020 2020 2020 and 2021 Adopted Proposed 2021 Increase (Decrease) Budget Amended Budget $ % City Council Wages, Payroll Taxes & Benefits 290,187 290,187 301,266 11,079 3.82% Supplies 4,950 4,950 5,500 550 11.11% Services & Charges 327,050 327,050 324,800 (2,250) (0.69%) Total 622,187 622,187 631,566 9,379 1.51% City Manager Wages, Payroll Taxes & Benefits 920,892 954,192 1,087,699 133,507 13.99% Supplies 4,300 4,300 6,800 2,500 58.14% Services & Charges 72,690 72,690 63,590 (9,100) (12.52%) Total 997,882 1,031,182 1,158,089 126,907 12.31% City Attorney Wages, Payroll Taxes & Benefits 616,403 616,403 627,353 10,950 1.78% Supplies 4,414 4,414 4,185 (229) (5.19%) Services & Charges 87,125 87,125 87,055 (70) (0.08%) Total 707,942 707,942 718,593 10,651 1.50% Public Safety Non-Departmental (Fines & Forfeits) 516,550 516,550 485,900 (30,650) (5.93%) Wages/Payroll Taxes/Benefits 13,266 13,266 19,000 5,734 43.22% Supplies 30,500 30,500 52,000 21,500 70.49% Other Services and Charges 587,515 337,515 277,715 (59,800) (17.72%) Intergovernmental Services 25,451,383 25,975,872 27,267,000 1,291,128 4.97% Total 26,599,214 26,873,703 28,101,615 1,227,912 4.57% Deputy City Manager Wages, Payroll Taxes & Benefits 234,012 234,012 243,944 9,932 4.24% Supplies 950 950 700 (250) (26.32%) Services & Charges 42,225 42,225 40,200 (2,025) (4.80%) Total 277,187 277,187 284,844 7,657 2.76% Finance/IT Wages, Payroll Taxes & Benefits 1,443,953 1,443,953 1,476,684 32,731 2.27% Supplies 6,450 6,450 3,000 (3,450) (53.49%) Services & Charges 28,120 28,120 20,975 (7,145) (25.41%) Total 1,478,523 1,478,523 1,500,659 22,136 1.50% Human Resources Wages, Payroll Taxes & Benefits 281,331 281,331 293,505 12,174 4.33% Supplies 1,280 1,280 1,000 (280) (21.88%) Services & Charges 30,705 30,705 24,035 (6,670) (21.72%) Total 313,316 313,316 318,540 5,224 1.67% (Continued to next page) Page 17 of 21 P:\Finance\2021 Budget\Budget Worksheets\RCAs and Intros and PowerPoint Presentations\2020 09 22\budget summary as of 2020 09 22 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 2021 Budget General Fund Department Changes from 2020 to 2021 Difference Between 2020 2020 2020 and 2021 Adopted Proposed 2021 Increase (Decrease) Budget Amended Budget $ % (Continued from previous page) City Hall Operations & Maintenance Wages, Payroll Taxes & Benefits 94,270 94,270 106,593 12,323 13.07% Supplies 28,000 28,000 27,000 (1,000) (3.57%) Services & Charges 174,000 174,000 167,500 (6,500) (3.74%) Total 296,270 296,270 301,093 4,823 1.63% Community& Public Works- Engineering Wages, Payroll Taxes & Benefits 1,726,845 1,710,195 1,855,308 145,113 8.49% Supplies 32,850 32,850 30,500 (2,350) (7.15%) Services & Charges 212,036 212,036 212,834 798 0.38% Total 1,971,731 1,955,081 2,098,642 143,561 7.34% Community& Public Works- Economic Dev Wages, Payroll Taxes & Benefits 724,084 724,084 639,017 (85,067) (11.75%) Supplies 3,000 3,000 3,000 0 0.00% Services & Charges 392,745 392,745 403,745 11,000 2.80% Total 1,119,829 1,119,829 1,045,762 (74,067) (6.61%) Community& Public Works - Building & Planning Wages, Payroll Taxes & Benefits 2,044,559 2,044,559 2,134,016 89,457 4.38% Supplies 47,000 47,000 35,050 (11,950) (25.43%) Services & Charges 328,855 328,855 318,000 (10,855) (3.30%) Total 2,420,414 2,420,414 2,487,066 66,652 2.75% Parks & Rec-Admin Wages, Payroll Taxes & Benefits 283,127 283,127 292,667 9,540 3.37% Supplies 5,000 5,000 5,000 0 0.00% Services & Charges 64,100 49,100 58,800 9,700 19.76% Total 352,227 337,227 356,467 19,240 5.71% Parks & Rec- Maintenance Wages, Payroll Taxes & Benefits 0 0 0 0 0.00% Supplies 3,500 3,500 3,500 0 0.00% Services & Charges 914,000 914,000 936,503 22,503 2.46% Total 917,500 917,500 940,003 22,503 2.45% Parks & Rec- Recreation Wages, Payroll Taxes & Benefits 231,081 181,081 230,484 49,403 27.28% Supplies 8,650 8,650 9,150 500 5.78% Services & Charges 86,190 53,190 88,900 35,710 67.14% Total 325,921 242,921 328,534 85,613 35.24% (Continued to next page) Page 18 of 21 P:\Finance\2021 Budget\Budget Worksheets\RCAs and Intros and PowerPoint Presentations\2020 09 22\budget summary as of 2020 09 22 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 2021 Budget General Fund Department Changes from 2020 to 2021 Difference Between 2020 2020 2020 and 2021 Adopted Proposed 2021 Increase (Decrease) Budget Amended Budget $ % (Continued from previous page) Parks & Rec-Aquatics Wages, Payroll Taxes & Benefits 0 0 0 0 0.00% Supplies 2,000 2,000 2,000 0 0.00% Services & Charges 499,853 130,853 508,053 377,200 288.26% Total 501,853 132,853 510,053 377,200 283.92% Parks & Rec- Senior Center Wages, Payroll Taxes & Benefits 36,347 36,347 28,303 (8,044) (22.13%) Supplies 1,600 1,600 1,600 0 0.00% Services & Charges 5,500 5,500 5,500 0 0.00% Total 43,447 43,447 35,403 (8,044) (18.51%) Parks & Rec- CenterPlace Wages, Payroll Taxes & Benefits 538,083 468,083 542,938 74,855 15.99% Supplies 85,537 67,537 85,537 18,000 26.65% Services & Charges 341,739 281,739 343,739 62,000 22.01% Total 965,359 817,359 972,214 154,855 18.95% General Government Wages, Payroll Taxes & Benefits 0 0 0 0 0.00% Supplies 99,000 99,000 81,400 (17,600) (17.78%) Services & Charges 802,100 802,100 813,050 10,950 1.37% Intergovernmental Services 362,511 362,511 372,930 10,419 2.87% Capital outlays 57,500 57,500 30,000 (27,500) (47.83%) Total 1,321,111 1,321,111 1,297,380 (23,731) (1.80%) Transfers out-#204 debt service 401,450 401,450 401,500 50 0.01% Transfers out-#309 park capital proL 160,000 160,000 160,000 0 0.00% Transfers out-#311 Pavement Preservation 982,023 982,023 991,843 9,820 1.00% Transfers out-#501 CenterPlace Kitchen Reserve 36,600 36,600 36,600 0 0.00% Transfers out-#502 410,000 410,000 425,000 15,000 3.66% Total recurring expenditures 43,221,986 42,898,125 45,101,466 2,203,341 5.14% Page 19 of 21 P:\Finance\2021 Budget\Budget Worksheets\RCAs and Intros and PowerPoint Presentations\2020 09 22\budget summary as of 2020 09 22 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 2021 Budget General Fund Department Changes from 2020 to 2021 Difference Between 2020 2020 2020 and 2021 Adopted Proposed 2021 Increase (Decrease) Budget Amended Budget $ % Summary by Category Wages, Payroll Taxes & Benefits 9,478,440 9,375,090 9,878,777 503,687 5.37% Supplies 368,981 350,981 356,922 5,941 1.69% Services & Charges 4,996,548 4,269,548 4,694,994 425,446 9.96% Transfers out-#204 401,450 401,450 401,500 50 0.01% Transfers out-#309 160,000 160,000 160,000 0 0.00% Transfers out-#311 - Pavement Presery 982,023 982,023 991,843 9,820 1.00% Transfers out-#501 36,600 36,600 36,600 0 0.00% Transfers out-#502 410,000 410,000 425,000 15,000 3.66% Non-Departmental (fines &forfeits) 516,550 516,550 485,900 (30,650) (5.93%) Intergovernmental Svc (public safety) 25,451,383 25,975,872 27,267,000 1,291,128 4.97% Intergovernmental Svc 362,511 362,511 372,930 10,419 2.87% Capital outlay 57,500 57,500 30,000 (27,500) (47.83%) 43,221,986 42,898,125 45,101,466 2,203,341 5.14% Page 20 of 21 P:\Finance\2021 Budget\Budget Worksheets\RCAs and Intros and PowerPoint Presentations\2020 09 22\budget summary as of 2020 09 22 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA Full Time Equivalent Employees Difference from Adopted Proposed Proposed 2020 to 2021 2011 I 2012 I 2013 I 2014 I 2015 I 2016 I 2017 I 2018 I 2019 2020 2020 2021 +(-) #001 -General Fund City Manager/City Clerk 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 7 6.5 6.5 7.5 7.5 1.000 City Attorney 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3.5 3.5 4 4 4 0.000 Public Safety 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.000 Deputy City Manager 7 7 6 6 6 6 6 3 1 1 1 1 0.000 Finance 11 11 10.75 11.75 11.75 11.75 11.75 11.75 11.75 11.75 11.75 11.75 0.000 Human Resources 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 0.000 Public Works 7.5 7.5 7 7.375 7.375 7.375 6.375 0 0 0 0 0 0.000 City Hall Operations&Maintenance 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.000 CPW-Engineering 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.5 13.275 13.525 13.025 14.025 0.500 (3)(4) CPW-Economic Development 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6.375 6 6 6 5 (1.000) (3) CPW-Building and Planning 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 20 21 21 21 0.000 CED-Administration 3 3 2 2 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0.000 CED-Economic Development 0 0 0 0 2.5 2.65 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.000 CED-Development Services 0 0 0 0 11 11 10 0 0 0 0 0 0.000 CED-Engineering 6 6 8 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.000 CED-Planning 8.5 8.5 8 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.000 CED-Building 12.75 12.75 11.5 12.5 14 14 15 0 0 0 0 0 0.000 Parks&Rec-Admin 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 0.000 Parks&Rec-Recreation 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1.6 1.6 1.6 0.000 Parks&Rec-Senior Center 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.000 Parks&Rec-CenterPlace 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 0.000 Total General Fund 74.75 74.75 72.25 73.625 73.625 73.775 74.125 74.125 74.025 75.775 76.275 76.275 0.500 #101 -Street Fund 5 4.5 5 5.375 5.725 5.725 5.725 5.725 7.725 7.475 7.475 7.475 0.000 #303-Street Capital Project Fund 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 5 8.1 8.1 7.6 7.6 (0.500) #402-Stormwater Fund 4 4.5 4.5 4.75 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.4 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9 0.000 Total FTEs 87.25 87.25 85.25 87.25 87.25 87.4 87.75 89.25 93.75 95.25 95.25 95.25 0.000 (1) FTEs for 2017 reflect the reorganization that was effective in April 2017. The original 2017 Budget had FTEs of 88.4. (2) FTEs for 2018 reflect the budget amendment approved on May 29, 2018. (3) One vacant position in Economic Development was repurposed to Engineering due to workload. (4) Vacant Engineering position that was split 50/50 between the General Fund and Street Capital Projects Fund was repurposed to a Housing&Homeless Services Coordinator in the City Manager department. Page 21 of 21 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: Sept 22, 2020 Department Director Approval: 1. Check all that apply: consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Approval of the Following Vouchers: VOUCHER LIST VOUCHER NUMBERS TOTAL AMOUNT 09/03/2020 51602-51616; 10620482 $2,093,786.71 09/04/2020 51617-51644 $321,275.86 09/08/2020 8821-8827 $4,811.00 09/10/2020 51645-51650; 10683433 $176,229.82 09/10/2020 7263-7264; 7267; 7269; 7278-7281; 7283; 7291-7292 $378,058.40 09/11/2020 51677-51702 $76,659.52 09/15/2020 51703 $20.00 09/16/2020 51704-51738 (-51714,-8828) $129,804.47 09/16/2020 51739 $316.87 GRAND TOTAL: $3,180,962.65 Explanation of Fund Numbers found on Voucher Lists #001 - General Fund 001.090.000.560. General Gov't-Social Services 001.011.000.511. City Council 001.090.000.594 General Gov't-Capital Outlay 001.013.000.513. City Manager 001.013.015.515. Legal Other Funds: 001.016.000. Public Safety 101 —Street Fund 001.018.013.513. Deputy City Manager 103 —Paths&Trails 001.018.014.514. Finance 105—Hotel/Motel Tax 001.018.016.518. Human Resources 106—Solid Waste 001.040.041. Engineering 120—CenterPlace Operating Reserve 001.040.042. Economic Development 121 Service Level Stabilization Reserve 001.040.043. Building 122—Winter Weather Reserve 001.076.000.576. Parks &Rec—Administration 204—Debt Service 001.076.300.576. Parks &Rec-Maintenance 301 —REET 1 Capital Projects 001.076.301.571. Parks & Rec-Recreation 302—REET 2 Capital Projects 001.076.302.576. Parks &Rec-Aquatics 303 —Street Capital Projects 001.076.304.575. Parks & Rec- Senior Center 309—Parks Capital Grants 001.076.305.571. Parks & Rec-CenterPlace 310—Civic Bldg. Capital Projects 001.090.000.511. General Gov't- Council related 311 —Pavement Preservation 001.090.000.514. General Gov't-Finance related 312—Capital Reserve 001.090.000.517. General Gov't-Employee supply 314—Railroad Grade Separation Projects 001.090.000.518. General Gov't- Centralized Serv. 402—Stormwater Management 001.090.000.519. General Gov't-Other Services 403 —Aquifer Protection Area 001.090.000.540. General Gov't-Transportation 501 —Equipment Rental &Replacement 001.090.000.550. General Gov't-Natural &Eco. 502—Risk Management 001.090.000.595. General Gov't-Pavement Preser. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to approve attached list of claim vouchers. [Approved as part of the Consent Agenda, or may be removed and discussed separately.] STAFF CONTACT: Chelsie Taylor, Finance Director ATTACHMENTS: Voucher Lists vchlist Voucher List Page: 1 09103/2020 12:23:14PM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept DescriptionlAccount Amount 51602 9/3/2020 002594 ARC ELECTRIC&LIGHTING CORP PO 44322 RETAINAGE 001.223.40.00 PRECINCT GENERATOR INSTALLATIOI 6,040.00 Total: 6,040.00 51603 9/3/2020 007932 BELFOR PROPERTY RESTORATION BLD-2020-0245&0297 001.040.043.322 PERMIT REFUND:BLD-2020-0245&BL 1,557.68 Total: 1,557.68 51604 9/3/2020 001926 FARR,SARAH EXPENSES 001.018.014.514 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 79.35 Total: 79.35 51605 9/3/2020 007498 FOSTER,AZIZA EXPENSES 001.013.015.515 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 20.38 Total: 20.38 51606 9/3/2020 007934 MAU,ROBERT W&GRETCHEN R PARCEL 45021.5906 303.000.249.595 CIP 0249 LAND/ROW ACQUISITION 12,750.00 Total: 12,750.00 51607 9/3/2020 004630 MAY,KENDALL EXPENSES 001.076.301.571 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 27.60 Total: 27.60 51608 9/3/2020 000132 MODERN ELECTRIC WATER CO CIP 0314 309.000.314.594 CIP 0314:ELECTRIC SERVICEAPPLIC) 200.00 Total: 200.00 51609 9/3/2020 001089 POE ASPHALT PAVING INC. PAY APP 5 303.000.295.595 0295-CONSTRUCTION 39,168.70 PAY APP 6 303.000.295.595 0295-CONSTRUCTION 80,230.31 Total: 119,399.01 51610 9/3/2020 007848 PROFORCE LAW ENFORCEMENT 419413 001.016.000.521 TASER PURCHASE JAG GRANT 14,688.43 Total: 14,688.43 51611 9/3/2020 007133 PRUNTY,CAITLIN EXPENSES 001.013.015.515 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 42.75 Total: 42,75 51612 9/3/2020 007878 SIGNATURE ROOFING PAY APP 2 309.223.40.00 0305-CONSTRUCTION 223,781.90 Total: 223,781.90 51613 9/312020 000001 SPOKANE CO TREASURER PARCEL45021.5906 303.000.249.595 CIP 0249:WARRANTY DEED PROCES: 10.00 Page: 1 vchlist Voucher List Page: 2 09/03/2020 12:23:14PM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 51613 9/3/2020 000001 000001 SPOKANE CO TREASURER (Continued) Total: 10.00 51614 9/3/2020 000001 SPOKANE CO TREASURER PARCEL 45021.5906 303.000.249.595 CIP 0249:TCE PARCEL 45021.5906 10.00 Total: 10.00 51615 9/3/2020 006413 THOMPSON,LINDA EXPENSES 001.011.000.511 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 25.00 Total: 25.00 51616 9/3/2020 007933 WILLIAMSON,JERIME BLD-2020-2312 001.040.043.322 PERMIT REFUND:BLD-2020-2312 480.61 Total: 460.61 10620482 8/31/2020 000001 SPOKANE CO TREASURER 9290201792 001.016.000.521 LE CONTRACT AUGUST 2020 1,714,674.00 Total: 1,714,674.00 16 Vouchers for bank code: apbank Bank total: 2,093,786.71 16 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers: 2,093,786.71 Page: 2 vchlist Voucher List Page:.! 09/04/2020 10:45:06AM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 51617 9/4/2020 000322 CENTURYLINK AUGUST 2020 001.076.000.576 2020 PHONE SVCS:ACCT 509 Z14-002. 592.08 Total: 592.08 51618 9/4/2020 001888 COMCAST Aug 18-Sep 172020 001.090.000.518 INTERNET:CITY HALL 116.18 Total: 116.18 51619 9/4/2020 003264 SHI INTERNATIONAL CORP B12157615 001.018.014.514 ADOBEACROBAT FOR FINANCE 283.75 Total: 283,75 51620 9/4/2020 007930 BC ENGINEERS INC 5877 309.000.305.594 0305-CA INSPECTIONS 6,803.30 Total: 6,803,30 51621 9/4/2020 000683 DAVID EVANS&ASSOCIATES 472245 303.000.300.595 0300-TRAFFIC ENGINEERING 1,582.17 Total: 1,582.17 51622 9/4/2020 000648 ABADAN REPROGRAPHICS 117029 303.000.275.595 CIP 0275:PRINT SERVICE 2,533.54 Total: 2,533.54 51623 9/4/2020 001545 BERNARDO WILLS ARCHITECTS PC 20646 309.000.268.595 0268-LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE 280.00 Total: 280.00 51624 9/4/2020 000734 DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION RE-313-A1600817153 303.000.275.595 CIP 0275 288.51 Total: 288.51 51625 9/4/2020 000683 DAVID EVANS&ASSOCIATES 472178 101.042.000.542 TRAFFIC SERVICES 2,523.06 Total: 2,523.06 51626 9/4/2020 003261 FEHR&PEERS 139640 001.040.041.543 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,854.80 139917 001.090.000.513 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 10,287.12 Total: 13,141.92 51627 9/4/2020 002043 HDR ENGINEERING INC 1200281648 314.000.223.595 0223-FINAL ENGINEERING DESIGN 12,461.77 1200288836 314.000.223.595 0223-FINAL ENGINEERING DESIGN 21,142.05 Total: 33,603.82 51628 9/4/2020 003238 KPFF CONSULTING ENGINEERS 338630 403.000.308.589 0308-ENGINEERING&ARCHITECTURE 180.39 Page:. vchlist Voucher List Page: --2----- 09/04/2020 10:45:06AM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 51628 9/4/2020 003238 003238 KPFF CONSULTING ENGINEERS (Continued) Total: 180.39 51529 9/4/2020 003210 WEST CONSULTANTS INC. 013894 402.000.000.531 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 7,687.53 Total: 7,687.53 51630 9/4/2020 000001 SPOKANE CO TREASURER 110100274 101.042.000.542 JULY 2020 ENGINEERING 100,727.20 Total: 100,727.20 51631 9/4/2020 003122 CALHOUN,MARK September 2020 001.013.000.513 MONTHLY AUTO ALLOWANCE FOR 9/2 400.00 Total: 400.00 51632 9/4/2020 000508 CONOCOPHILLIPS FLEET 67260030 001.040.043.558 AUGUST 2020 FLEET FUEL BILL 1,325.85 Total: 1,325.85 51633 9/4/2020 003274 EXCHANGE PUBLISHING LLC 577949 001.011.000.511 ADVERTISING 36.34 Total: 36.34 51634 9/4/2020 002975 FREEDOM SALES AND SUPPLY LLC 2020470 001,033,000.518 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 17.61 Total: 17.61 51635 9/4/2020 000652 OFFICE DEPOT INC. 116105068001 001.040.043.524 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES:FLEET 31.98 117370277001 001.018.014.514 OFFICE SUPPLIES:FINANCE 81.66 117371537001 001.018.014.514 OFFICE SUPPLIES:FINANCE 21.30 Total: 134.94 51636 9/4/2020 002424 PITNEY BOWES GLOBAL 3311919541 001.090.000.518 LEASE CONTRACT 2969758001 1,067.10 Total: 1,067.10 51537 9/4/2020 000001 SPOKANE CO TREASURER 42000767 001.016.000.554 ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES SEPTEIV 22,337.20 51505482 001.016.000.523 AUGUST 2020 INMATE HOUSING 116,961.21 Total: 139,298.41 51638 9/4/2020 000065 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 3455362458 001.090.000.519 KITCHEN SUPPLIES 114.36 3455362459 001.090.000.519 KITCHEN SUPPLIES:CLOROX WIPES 32.32 Total: 146.68 51639 9/4/2020 000322 CENTURYLINK Aug 19-Sept 19 2020 001.090.000.518 CITY HALL PHONES 305.06 Page: vchlist Voucher List Page: 09/0412020 10:45:06AM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 51639 9/4/2020 000322 000322 CENTURYLINK (Continued) Total: 306.06 51640 9/4/2020 002604 DELL FINANCIAL SERVICES LLC 80550551 001.090.000.548 2020 DELL DESKTOP LEASE 48 MONTI 986.55 80550552 001.090.000.548 2020 DELL DISPLAY LEASE"B"48 MOIL 142.27 80550553 001.090.000.548 2020 DELL DISPLAY LEASE"A"36 MON 176.38 80550554 001.090.000.548 2020 DELL WORKSTATION LEASE"B"4 409.18 80550555 001.090.000.548 2020 WORKSTATION LEASE"A"36 MO 487.31 Total: 2,201.69 51641 9/4/2020 002604 DELL FINANCIAL SERVICES LLC 80550545 001.090.000.548 COMPUTER LEASE:001-8922117-007 139.58 80550546 001.090.000.548 COMPUTER LEASE:001-8922117-008 658.51 80550547 001.090.000.548 COMPUTER LEASE:001-8922117-009 368.09 80550548 001.090.000.548 COMPUTER LEASE:001-8922117-010 187.76 80550549 001.090.000.548 COMPUTER LEASE:001-8922117-011 806.78 80550550 001.090.000.548 COMPUTER LEASE:001-8922117-012 266.18 Total: 2,426.90 51642 9/4/2020 000044 DELL MARKETING LP 10419824769 001.076.305.575 DELL LATITUDE 3410 LAPTOP 2,006.94 Total: 2,006.94 51643 9/4/2020 004632 LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS 141275238 001.090.000.518 TELECOM SERVICES 812.89 Total: 812.89 51644 9/4/2020 000230 SPOKANE CO AUDITORS OFFICE JULY 2020 314.000.143.595 RECORDING FEES 751.00 Total: 751.00 28 Vouchers for bank code: apbank Bank total: 321,275.86 28 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers: 321,275.86 Page: vchlist Voucher List Page: 09108/2020 2:35:54PM Spokane Valley Bank code: pk-ref Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 8821 9/8/2020 007935 CLAYTON,DANIEL PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 CANCELLATION REFUND:GREAT ROC 2,810.00 Total: 2,810.00 8822 9/8/2020 007937 EWAHU PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 CANCELLATION REFUND:ROOM 212 527.00 Total: 527.00 8823 9/8/2020 007039 GOLD SEAL MECHANICAL PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 REISSUE DEPOSIT REFUND:ROOM 1C 52.00 Total: 52.00 8824 9/8/2020 002354 HOLMES, NANCY PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 CANCELLATION REFUND:FIRESIDE L( 962.00 Total: 962.00 8825 9/8/2020 007936 INLAND IMAGING PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 CANCELLATION REFUND:GREAT ROC 210.00 Total: 210.00 8826 9/8/2020 007938 SONG,SAM PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 CANCELLATION REFUND:SEPA FOR Iv 40.00 Total: 40.00 8827 9/8/2020 007789 SURE FOUNDATION BAPTIST CHURCH PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 REISSUE DEPOSIT REFUND:GREAT R 210.00 Total: 210.00 7 Vouchers for bank code: pk-ref Bank total: 4,811.00 7 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers: 4,811.00 Page: T 2 —1----- vchlist Voucher List Page: 09/10/2020 11:42:44AM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 51645 9/10/2020 002594 ARC ELECTRIC&LIGHTING CORP PAY APP 3 001.223.40.00 CITY HALL GENERATOR INSTALLATIOI 11,225.20 Total: 11,225.20 51646 9/10/2020 001881 DOMRESE.DAN EXPENSES 001.018.014.514 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 85.00 Total: 85.00 51647 9/10/2020 007944 DUTCH BROS 2020-10082933 001.016.000.342 FARU REFUND:PAYMENT ID 79583243 65.00 Total: 65.00 51648 9/10/2020 007943 HOLLING,DANNA 2020-10093292 001.016.000.342 FARU REFUND:PAYMENT ID 79312629 65.00 Total: 65.00 51649 9/10/2020 000157 MOAT,BRIAN EXPENSES 101.042.000.543 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 17.16 Total: 17.16 51650 9/10/2020 007942 NW BUILDING MAINTENANCE 2020-1057866 001.016.000.342 FARU REFUND:PAYMENT ID 78547347 65.00 Total: 65.00 10683433 9/4/2020 000001 SPOKANE CO TREASURER AUGUST 2020 001.016.000.512 SPOKANE COUNTY SERVICES 164,707,46 Total: 164,707.46 7 Vouchers for bank code: apbank Bank total: 176,229.82 7 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers: 176,229.82 Page: vchlist Voucher List Page: V r-- 09/1012020 12:21:53PM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 7263 9/4/2020 000120 AWC Ben95117 001.231.16.00 DENTAL PLAN:PAYMENT 145,910.23 Total: 145,910.23 7264 9/4/2020 000165 DEPT OF RETIREMENT SYSTEMS Ben95119 001.231.15.00 PERS:PAYMENT 126,585.88 Total: 126,585.88 7267 9/4/2020 000699 WA COUNCIL CO/CITY EMPLOYEES Ben95121 101.231.21.00 UNION DUES:PAYMENT 2,758.12 Total: 2,758.12 7269 9/4/2020 007657 WA STATE SUPPORT REGISTRY Ben95123 101.231.20.00 DIVISION OF CHILD SUPPORT:PAYMEi 458.00 Total: 458.00 7278 9/4/2020 000048 VANTAGE TRANSFER AGENTS,401A PLAN Ben95125 402.231.14.00 401A:PAYMENT 38,244.08 Total: 38,244.08 7279 9/4/2020 000682 EFTPS Ben95127 501.231.11.00 FEDERAL TAXES:PAYMENT 38,753.23 Total: 38,753.23 7280 9/4/2020 007303 VANTAGEPOINT TRANSFER AGENTS,457 RO Ben95129 101.231.23.00 457 ROTH OPTION:PAYMENT 1,674.45 Total: 1,674.45 7281 9/4/2020 000145 VANTAGEPOINTTRANSFERAGENTS,457 PLC Ben95131 314.231.18.00 457 DEFERRED COMPENSATION:PAYI 9,582.24 Total: 9,582.24 7283 9/4/2020 000162 VANTAGE TRANSFER AGENTS,401A EXEC PL Ben95133 001.231.14.00 401 EXEC PLAN:PAYMENT 703.31 Total: 703.31 7291 9/4/2020 000120 AWC Ben95140 001.231.16.00 DENTAL PLAN(COUNCIL):PAYMENT 11,307.10 Total: 11,307.10 7292 9/4/2020 000682 EFTPS Ben95142 001.231.11.00 FEDERAL TAXES:PAYMENT 2,081.78 Total: 2,081.76 11 Vouchers for bank code: apbank Bank total: 378,058.40 11 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers: 378,058.40 —Page: 9 .......____ vchlist Voucher List Page: 1 09/11/2020 12:54:29PM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 51677 9/11/2020 007136 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES INC 1JY9-Y6NM-WWPG 001.033.000.518 SUPPLIES FOR CITY HALL 48.04 Total: 48.04 51678 9/11/2020 007808 AMENTO GROUP INC 062046 001.033.099.51 B CONTRACT 02-041:PROFESSIONAL SI 361.00 072037 001.033.099.518 PROFESSIONAL SVCS:CHAMBERS AF 13,306.00 Total: 13,667.00 51679 9111/2020 007872 BENDER,DONALD A June 2020 001.033.099,518 PROFESSIONAL SVCS:CONTRACT 20• 1,785.00 Total: 1,785.00 51680 9/11/2020 000143 CITY OF SPOKANE IN-034210 001.040.043.558 HEARING EXAMINER:INTERLOCALAG 8,957.50 Total: 8,957.50 51681 9/11/2020 002157 ELJAY OIL COMPANY 0881271 001.033.000.518 FUEL FOR GENERATOR LOAD TEST 92.78 Total: 92.78 51682 9/11/2020 003274 EXCHANGE PUBLISHING LLC 575165 001.033.000.518 LEGAL PUBLICATION 40.29 575893 001.033.000.518 LEGAL PUBLICATION 38.25 Total: 78.54 51683 9/11/2020 001447 FREE PRESS PUBLISHING INC 51170 001.033.000,518 LEGAL PUBLICATION 91.20 Total: 91.20 51684 9/11/2020 000002 H&H BUSINESS SYSTEMS INC. AR163872 001.040.043.558 TONER-LARGE FORMAT PRINTER 131.74 Total: 131.74 51685 9/11/2020 002363 WESTERN STATES EQUIPMENT CO IN001381082 001.033.000.518 SERVICE CALL SC216490 958.31 Total: 958.31 51686 9/11/2020 000150 ALLIED FIRE&SECURITY 853426 001.076.305.575 SERVICE CALL AT CENTERPLACE 32.67 Total: 32.67 51687 9/11/2020 004046 AMERICAN ONSITE SERVICES 352730 001.076.301.571 PORTABLE RESTROOMS AT PARKS 415.00 352798 001.076.301.571 PORTABLE RESTROOMS AT PARKS 415.00 352803 001.076.300.576 PORTABLE RESTROOMS AT PARKS 245.00 353217 001.076.301.571 CREDIT MEMO-OVERCHARGE FOR L -400.00 Page: vchlist Voucher List Page: f '" 0911112020 12:54:29PM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 51687 9/11/2020 004046 004046 AMERICAN ONSITE SERVICES (Continued) Total: 675.00 51688 9/11/2020 007718 APPLETREE 000017-975-831 001.076.305.575 ANSWERING SERVICE FOR CENTERP 39.44 Total: 39.44 51689 9/11/2020 001545 BERNARDO WILLSARCH]TECTS PC 20659 001.076.000.576 GRANT APPLICATION ASSISTANCE 9,500.00 Total: 9,500.00 51690 9/11/2020 004125 IBEX FLOORING LLC 11378 001.076.099.575 CARPET REPLACEMENT CENTERPLA( 15,517.41 Total: 15,517.41 51691 9/11/2020 001635 ISS FACILITY EVENT SERVICES 1485831 001.076.305.575 AUGUST 2020 MONTHLY CLEANING Al 8,085.09 Total: 8,085.09 51692 9/11/2020 000652 OFFICE DEPOT INC. 115158138001 001.076.000.576 OFFICE SUPPLIES FOR CENTERPLACI 123.42 Total; 123.42 51693 9/11/2020 007741 REFRIGERATION SUPPLIES DIST 16255878-01 001.076.305.575 SUPPLIES AT CENTERPLACE 37.20 Total: 37.20 51694 9/11/2020 000709 SENSKE LAWN&TREE CARE INC. 10162452 001.076.300.576 ADDITIONAL CLEANING OF PARKS RE 1,524.60 Total: 1,524.60 51695 9/11/2020 001903 SPOKANE TRAFFIC CONTROL INC 5281 001.076.301.571 TRAFFIC CONTROL 547.50 Total: 547.50 51696 9/11/2020 001922 SWANK MOTION PICTURES INC RG 2896136 001.076.301.571 SUMMER OUTDOOR MOVIE LICENSE 645.00 Total: 645.00 51697 9/11/2020 000326 CONSOLIDATED IRRIGATION#19 Aug 2020 402.402.000.531 UTILITIES:CPWAUG 2020 567.68 Aug 2020 001.076.300.576 UTILITIES:AUG 2020 PARKS AND CP 1,573.70 Total: 2,141.38 51698 9/11/2020 000246 EAST SPOKANE WATER DIST#1 Aug 2020 402.402.000.531 WATER CHARGES FOR AUG 2020 3,572.42 Total: 3,672.42 51699 9/11/2020 000070 INLAND POWER&LIGHT CO Aug 2020 101.042.000.542 UTILITIES:AUG 2020 450.80 Total: 450.80 Page: ` vchlist Voucher List Page: 09/11/2020 12:54:29PM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept DescriptionlAccount Amount 51700 9/11/2020 005012 SPOKANE CO ENVIRONMENTAL Sept 2020 001.033.000.518 SPOKANE CO SEWER CHRGS:SEPT 2 1,621.89 Total: 1,621.89 51701 9/11/2020 000324 SPOKANE CO WATER DIST#3 Aug 2020#2 402.402.000.531 WATER CHARGES FOR AUG#2 1,864.65 Total: 1,864.65 51702 9/11/2020 000167 VERA WATER&POWER Aug 2020 101.042.000.542 UTILITIES:AUG 2020 4,370,94 Total: 4,370.94 26 Vouchers for bank code: apbank Bank total: 76,659.52 26 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers: 76,659.52 I,the undersigned,do certify under penalty of perjury, that the materials have been furnished,the services rendered,or the labor performed as described herein and that the claim is just,due and an unpaid obligation against the City of Spokane Valley,and that I am authorized to authenticate and certify said claim. Finance Director Date Council member reviewed: Mayor Date Council Member Date Page: 3 /2 vchlist Voucher List Page: 09/15/2020 9:27:02AM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 51703 9/15/2020 000001 SPOKANE CO TREASURER 55061.9047 314.000.143.595 CIP 0143:WARRANTY DEED PROCESE 10.00 55061.9048 314.000.143.595 CIP 0143:TCE PARCEL 55061.9048 10.00 Total: 20.D0 1 Vouchers for bank code: apbank. Bank total: 20.00 1 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers: 20.00 I,the undersigned,do certify under penalty of perjury, that the materials have been furnished,the services rendered,or the labor performed as described herein and that the claim is just,due and an unpaid obligation against the City of Spokane Valley,and that I am authorized to authenticate and certify said claim. Finance Director Date Council member reviewed: Mayor Date Council Member Date Page: �� 3 vch list Voucher List Page: / 1-"--- 09/1612020 8:54:45AM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 51704 9/15/2020 000652 OFFICE DEPOT INC. 113134421001 001.040.041.543 OFFICE SUPPLIES:ENGINEERING/DE\ 44.39 116565823001 001,040,041.543 OFFICE SUPPLIES:ENGINEERING/DE\ 18.47 116565823002 001.040.041.543 OFFICE SUPPLIES:ENGINEERING/DE\ 45.73 116582083001 001.040.041.543 OFFICE SUPPLIES:ENGINEERING/DE\ 62.82 117812493001 001.040.041.543 OFFICE SUPPLIES:ENGINEERINGIDE\ 74.69 117814785001 001.040.041.543 OFFICE SUPPLIES:ENGINEERING/DE\ 74.69 120342074001 001.040.041.558 OFFICE SUPPLIES:ENGINEERINGIDE\ 56.93 Total: 377.72 51705 9115/2020 007136 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES INC 19JL-3MPH-HTXG 001.033.000.518 SUPPLIES:CITY HALL MAINTENANCE 85.22 1M1W-L3DP-HWJK 001.033.000.518 SUPPLIES FOR CITY HALL 96.36 Total: 181.58 51706 9/15/2020 003337 ARROW CONSTRUCTION SUPPLY INC 280029 001.033.000.518 REPAIR&MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES F 70.44 Total: 70.44 51707 9/15/2020 002891 BASIN SOD INCORPORATED 48186 001.033.000.518 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES:CITY HALL 381.15 48367 001.033.000.518 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES:CITY HALL. 304.92 48385 001.033.000.518 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES:CITY HALL 571.73 Total: 1,257.80 51708 9/15/2020 007673 DIBBLE ENGINEERS INC 26861 001.033.099.518 CITY HALL STRUCTURAL REVIEW 3,885,00 Total: 3,885.00 51709 9/15/2020 000007 GRAINGER 9628,958200 001.033.000.518 REPAIR&MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES:C 73.74 Total: 73.74 51710 9/15/2020 007134 MINUTEMAN PRESS 3318 001.040.043.558 PRINTING 120.51 Total: 120.51 51711 9/15/2020 001860 PLATT ELECTRIC SUPPLY 0052499 001.016.016.521 SUPPLIES FOR PRECINCT 282.60 Total: 282.60 51712 9/15/2020 007096 SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORP 8105411081 001.033.000.518 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE 2,344.40 Total: 2,344.40 51713 9/15/2020 000065 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 3455362457 001.040.043.558 OFFICE SUPPLIES:BLDG. 253.73 Page: vchlist Voucher List Page: ./ ,-2------- 09/16/2020 8:54:45AM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 51713 9/15/2020 000065 000065 STAPLES ADVANTAGE (Continued) Total: 253.73 61714 0/15/2020 007159 THE HOME DEPOT PRO 56� 74 001.033.000.518 $urf'LICs FOR CITY HALL 87.17 Check 51714 voided 9/16/2020 - kw Total: 67.47 51715 9/15/2020 007231 WESTERN EXTERMINATOR COMPANY 5633560 001.016.016.521 PEST MGMT SERVICES AT PRECINCT 189.49 5633562 001.033.000.518 PEST MGMT SERVICES AT CITY HALL 161.17 Total: 350.66 51716 9/15/2020 000734 DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION RE 46 JG6515 L003 311.000.285.595 0285-SIGN INSTALLATION 653.56 Total: 653.56 51717 9/15/2020 003682 EPIC LAND SOLUTIONS INC 0820-0857 303.000.249.595 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,362.85 Total: 2,362.85 51718 9/15/2020 000648 ABADAN REPROGRAPHICS 117867 309.000.315.594 CIP 0315:PRINT SERVICE 209.38 Total: 209.38 51719 9/15/2020 003274 EXCHANGE PUBLISHING LLC 577951 309.000.315.594 CIP 0315ADVERTISING 83.74 Total: 83.74 51720 9/15/2020 000469 NORTHWEST PLAYGROUND EQUIP INC 46988 309.000.304.594 0304-HALF HEXAGON STEEL STRUCTI 25,075.87 Total: 25,075.87 51721 9/15/2020 002308 TERRELL LANDSCAPEARCHITECT,MICHAEL 4031 309.000.304.594 0304-CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATIC 1,577.35 Total: 1,577.35 51722 9/15/2020 007107 STANTEC CONSULTING SVCS INC 1691957 001.040.043.558 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 44.75 Total: 44.75 51723 9/15/2020 007739 SWANA 2021-1685848 106.143.70.00 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL:HENRY ALLE 358.00 Total: 358.00 51724 9/15/2020 003210 WEST CONSULTANTS INC. 013962 402.000.000.531 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,265.53 Total: 1,265.53 51725 9/15/2020 001447 FREE PRESS PUBLISHING INC 155899 001.040.042.558 ADVERTISING 320.00 156030 001.040.042.558 ADVERTISING 320.00 Page: ,r2"----- /--5-- vchlist Voucher List Page: -Si 09/1612020 8:54:45AM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 51725 9115/2020 001447 001447 FREE PRESS PUBLISHING INC (Continued) Total: 640.00 51726 9/15/2020 000038 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF SPOKANE 0072707-1518-3 402.402.000.531 WASTE MGMT VACTORING WASTE AL 627.44 Total: 627.44 51727 9/15/2020 004046 AMERICAN ONSITE SERVICES 353958 001.076.300.576 PORTABLE RESTROOMS AT PARKS 289.00 Total: 289.09 51728 9/15/2020 000795 EARTHWORKS RECYCLING[NC. 364712 001.076.305.575 RECYCLING COLLECTION AT CENTER 20.00 Total: 20.00 51729 9/15/2020 000652 OFFICE DEPOT INC. 119287518001 001.076.000.576 OFFICE SUPPLIES:CENTERPLACE 118.81 Total: 118.81 51730 9/15/2020 000881 OXARC INC 31052210 001.076.305.575 REPAIR&MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES-I 65.06 Total: 65.06 51731 9/15/2020 001860 PLATT ELECTRIC SUPPLY OR89158 001.076.305.575 SUPPLIES FOR CENTERPLACE 23.60 Total: 23.60 51732 9/15/2020 007741 REFRIGERATION SUPPLIES DIST 16256880-00 001.076.305.575 SUPPLIES:CENTERPLACE 884.66 16257604-0D 001.076.305.575 SUPPLIES:CENTERPLACE 66.34 Total: 951,00 51733 9/15/2020 D00709 SENSKE LAWN&TREE CARE INC. 10/73496 001.076.300.576 CONTRACT MAINT PARKS:AUGUST 2C 63,630.03 101768313 001.076.300.576 ADDITIONAL EMPLOYEE TO CLEAN PA 1,524.60 10228911 001.076.300.576 ADDITIONAL CLEANING OF PARKS RE 1,524.60 Total: 66,679.23 51734 9/15/2020 003231 SHERWIN WILLIAMS COMPANY 4877-7 001.076.305.575 SUPPLIES FOR CENTERPLACE 42.87 Total: 42.87 51735 9/15/2020 000090 SPOKANE CO INFO SYSTEMS 50319856 001.040.043.558 COUNTY IT SUPPORT AUGUST 2020 14,642.43 Total: 14,642.43 51736 9/15/2020 000709 SENSKE LAWN&TREE CARE INC. 10173438 402.402.000.531 B95 CONTRACT MAINTENANCE 3,915.22 Total: 3,915.22 Page: 3 - vchlist Voucher List Page: I r 09/16/2020 8:54:45AM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept DescriptionlAccount Amount 51737 9/15/2020 007136 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES INC 1WP4-PVWF-YBGK 001.090.000.518 SMALL TOOLS/MINOR EQUIPMENT:GE 58.77 Total: 58.77 51738 9/15/2020 000002 H&H BUSINESS SYSTEMS[NC. AR166011 001.011.000.511 COPIER COSTS:WEST WING/COUNCII 90.47 AR166012 001.018.014.514 COPIER COSTS:IT 12.63 AR166013 001.018.016,518 COPIER COSTS:HR 12.21 AR166014 001.013.000.513 COPIER COSTS:OPS/ADMIN 176.32 AR166015 001.013.015.515 COPIER COSTS:LEGAL 156.66 AR166016 001.040.043.558 COPIER COSTS:PERMIT CTR 47,06 AR166017 001.040.041.543 COPIER COSTS:CPW ENGINEERING 300.39 AR166018 101.042.000.542 COPIER COSTS:MAINTENANCE SHOF 12.20 AR166019 001.076.000.576 COPIER COSTS:CENTERPLACE 93.89 Total: 901.83 35 Vouchers for bank code: apbank Bank total: 129,871.94 $129,804.47 - kw Page: ` vchlist Voucher List Page: /2 09/16/2020 8:54:45AM Spokane Valley Bank code: pk-ref Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 8828 0115/2020 007150 THE HOME DEPOT PRO 566596276 031.033.000.548 SUPPLIER FOR CITY HALL_ 249 4B Total: 249.40 1 Vouchers for bank code: pk-ref Check 8828 voided 9/16/2020- Bank total s/b zero Bank total: 24940 kw 36 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers: 130,121.34 $129,804.47 - kw I,the undersigned,do certify under penalty of perjury, that the materials have been furnished,the services rendered,or the labor performed as described herein and that the claim is just,due and an unpaid obligation against the City of Spokane Valley,and that l am authorized to authenticate and certify said claim. Finance Director Date Council member reviewed: Mayor Date Council Member Date Page: vchlist Voucher List Page: /2 09116/2020 9:20:27AM Spokane Valley Bank code_ apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 51739 9/16/2020 007159 THE HOME DEPOT PRO 556596276 001.033.000.518 SUPPLIES FOR CITY HALL 316.87 Total: 316.87 1 Vouchers for bank code: apbank Bank total: 316.87 1 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers: 316.87 I,the undersigned,do certify under penalty of perjury, that the materials have been furnished,the services rendered,or the labor performed as described herein and that the claim is just,due and an unpaid obligation against the City of Spokane Valley,and that i am authorized to authenticate and certify said claim. Finance Director Date Council member reviewed: Mayor Date Council Member Date Page: CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: September 22, 2020 Department Director Approval : Item: Check all that apply: ® consent ❑ old business [' new business [' public hearing [' information [' admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Payroll for Pay Period Ending September 15, 2020 GOVERNING LEGISLATION: PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: BACKGROUND: Budget/Financial impacts: Employees Council Total Gross: $ 319,757.68 $ - $ 319,757.68 Benefits: $ 68,643.98 $ - $ 68,643.98 Total payroll $ 388,401.66 $ - $ 388,401.66 RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to Approve above payroll. [Approved as part of the Consent Agenda, or may be removed and discussed separately.] STAFF CONTACT: Raba Nimri DRAFT MINUTES SPOKANE VALLEY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING FORMAL FORMAT Spokane Valley City Hall Spokane Valley,Washington September 8,2020 Mayor Wick called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. The meeting was held remotely via ZOOM meeting. Attendance: Councilmembers Staff Ben Wick,Mayor Mark Calhoun,City Manager Brandi Peetz,Deputy Mayor John Hohman,Deputy City Manager Pam Haley, Councilmember Chelsie Taylor,Finance Director Tim Hattenburg Councilmember Cary Driskell, City Attorney Rod Higgins, Councilmember Erik Lamb,Deputy City Attorney Linda Thompson, Councilmember Mike Stone,Parks&Recreation Director Arne Woodard, Councilmember Lori Barlow, Senior Planner Mike Basinger,Economic Develop.Manager Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk ROLL CALL City Clerk Bainbridge called the roll; all Councilmembers were present. APPROVAL OF AGENDA It was moved by Deputy Mayor Peetz, seconded and unanimously agreed to approve the agenda. INTRODUCTION OF SPECIAL GUESTS AND PRESENTATIONS n/a COMMITTEE,BOARD,LIAISON SUMMARY REPORTS Councilmember Haley: mentioned that the Performance and Development(P&D) Committee of the STA (Spokane Transit Authority) met and discussed much of the same things as they discussed during their workshop;said STA wanted a zero-emission bus but will first get about half of what they ordered in electric buses and the second half will be ordered through whatever company will do the best; said battery operated buses don't have enough charge to complete a full route; said the STA is also conducting a study on the I- 90 valley corridor and they are seeking public input;that members of the public wishing to comment should visit the STA website; she also mentioned there is an idea of maybe moving the Mirabeau park and ride or making it bigger, and to have additional park and rides; said they will be doing a pilot project for a rapid bus transit line which was going to be implemented in 2023 or 2024,but now it looks like that won't occur until 2026; said they also discussed the couplet on Division and Ruby and haven't decided to keep Division a one-way; said the couplet hasn't worked the way they thought it would and they are considering going back to two-way; said she also met with the Continuum of Care and she is working on grading Housing First Grant Applications, which deadline was extended for two more weeks. Mayor Wick suggested we invite a representative from the STA to come talk to us about park and rides, and Councilmember Haley said they have offered to do that any time.Mayor Wick said he will bring this up again during the Advance Agenda item on tonight's agenda. Councilmember Woodard: no report. Councilmember Hattenburg: said the STA is also conducting a one-year pilot program to reduce fares for non-profits, and is now accepting applications; said they have approved 2021 events such as Bloomsday, Hoopfest,the Fair, and Valleyfest for half-price fare except there will be no charge for Valleyfest. Councilmember Higgins: said he met with the Clean Air Agency and they have hired a new executive director, a Mr. Scott Windsor who previously worked with Spokane Solid Waste Depaitnient, and that he will begin his duties around the first of October. Regular Formal Council Meeting: 09-08-2020 Page 1 of 5 Approved by Council: DRAFT Councilmember Thompson; said she met with the AWC (Association of Washington Cities) Equity Committee and is working with a group with the NLC (National League of Cities) to bring diversity and equity training to the AWC; said the Large City Committee will meet next week and there is a lot on the agenda about how cities are faring economically with the COVID;mentioned the devastation of the Town of Malden, Washington, which was almost entirely wiped out by fires and asked if our city might be able to do something to assist them; said she has not contacted anyone in that regard yet and Mayor Wick suggested a conference call to see how they are doing.Councilmember Thompson also noted that Ms.Micki Harnois from Rockford has reached out to Malden so she (Councilmember Thompson) will connect with them also and maybe discuss what they might need. Deputy Mayor Peetz: said she had a Washington Traffic Safety Commission meeting with staff; that she got a run-down of what to expect and received lots of reading materials and their first meeting will be in October; said she attended a Chamber of Commerce meeting where they discussed CARES funding and they also talked about their new location on University and Sprague; that they are close to being done and that there will probably be some sort of ribbon cutting in the future; said she also attended an AWC Legislative Priority Meeting; said that sad to say, some of the things she mentioned previously did go forward after lengthy debate; said they `buttoned up' their agenda and will bring it to the Board to see if maybe it will change then, and said that once she gets the copy, she will get Councilmembers a copy; she said the majority of the discussion was about law enforcement reform; and she also extended kudos to retired Liberty Lake Police Chief Asmus. MAYOR'S REPORT Mayor Wick mentioned that recently retired Liberty Lake Police Chief Brian Asmus is now the new director of security for the Central Valley School District;noted that we will receive another round of CARES funds from the state, and said our city is one of the few cities that have allocated or determined how to spend those funds and that the due date has been extended until the end of November for the second round of funds. PROCLAMATION: Constitution Week After Mayor Wick read the proclamation,proclaiming Constitution week as September 17—23,Ms. Janet Ulbright, member of the local DAR(Daughters of the American Revolution) expressed her gratitude for the proclamation to encourage citizens to learn more about their Constitution and their American heritage. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT OPPORTUNITY Ill: Mayor Wick went over the basic process for giving public comment. There were four people who signed up to speak: Ms. Nicole Luth, Spokane Valley: said she is with Paine Hamblen Attorneys and was speaking on behalf of the Black Pearl Casino; she mentioned a previous letter sent to Councilmembers concerning the 6%tax on the gross revenue of social card games and that by comparison, the City of Spokane's tax is currently 2% of the gross revenue; said they are asking for more than temporary relief to establishments like the Black Pearl who are unfairly and disproportionately burdened by this tax; and she asked Council to consider reducing the tax on social card games from the current 6% rate to be more competitive with the City of Spokane. Ms. Diana Wilhite, Spokane Valley: signed up but was not `zoomed into' the meeting. Ms. Barb Howard, Spokane Valley: mentioned the town of Malden, Washington which was hit by a fire and that approximately 80% of the town is gone, including the Post Office and City Hall; she also commented about firetrucks coming from the south going north around the roundabout on Montgomery and Mansfield; said the road is being damaged by the heavy trucks making ridges on the road on the far east side of the roundabout. Mr. Bob West, Spokane Valley: said he was addressing public comments made by Barb Howard at the August 11 Council meeting,toward him and Councilmembers,and said he wanted to set the record straight about some of those comments. It sounded as though Mr. West was reading from a prepared statement about some allegations made during the August 11 meeting, and at one point, Councilmember Higgins asked for a point of order that Mr.West could keep his comments to city business. Mayor Wick permitted Regular Formal Council Meeting: 09-08-2020 Page 2 of 5 Approved by Council: DRAFT Mr. West to continue his comments, after which City Attorney Driskell said there is an agenda item scheduled for the September 22 Council meeting to discuss additional parameters on public comments. 1. CONSENT AGENDA: Consists of items considered routine which are approved as a group. Any member of Council may ask that an item be removed from the Consent Agenda to be considered separately. Proposed Motion:I move to approve the Consent Agenda. a.Approval of claim vouchers on Sept 8,2020,Request for Council Action Form Total: $282,423.59 b.Approval of Payroll for Pay Period Ending August 31,2020: $539,769.38 c.Approval of August 25,2020 Council Meeting Minutes,Regular Formal Format It was moved by Deputy Mayor Peetz, seconded and unanimously agreed to approve the Consent Agenda. NEW BUSINESS: 2. Second Reading Ordinance 20-007 Code Text Amendment,Annexation—Mike Basinger,Erik Lamb After City Clerk Bainbridge read the ordinance title, it was moved by Deputy Mayor Peetz and seconded to approve ordinance No. 20-007, Code Text Amendment to Chapter 19.180 SVMC as proposed. Mr. Basinger explained that this amendment will repeal and replace the entire SVMC chapter 19.180 in order to provide clarification for annexation. There were no public comments. Vote by acclamation: in favor: unanimous. Opposed: none. Motion carried. 3. Second Reading Ordinance 20-008 Comprehensive Plan Amendments—Mike Basinger After City Clerk Bainbridge read the ordinance title,it was moved by Deputy Mayor Peetz and seconded to approve Ordinance 20-008, Comprehensive Plan amendments as proposed. Mr. Basinger gave a brief overview of the amendments and of Council's direction per each amendment. There were no public comments. Vote by acclamation: in favor: unanimous. Opposed: none. Motion carried. 4. Second Reading Ordinance 20-009 Comprehensive Plan Zoning Map Amendment—Mike Basinger After City Clerk Bainbridge read the ordinance title,it was moved by Deputy Mayor Peetz and seconded to approve Ordinance 20-009, Official Zoning Amendments.Mr.Basinger explained that this is the companion ordinance to the Comprehensive Plan. There were no public comments. Vote by acclamation: in favor: unanimous. Opposed: none. Motion carried. 5. Second Reading Ordinance 20-010 Code Text Amendment,Essential Public Facilities—Lori Barlow After City Clerk Bainbridge read the ordinance title,it was moved by Deputy Mayor Peetz and seconded to approve Ordinance No. 20-010 to prohibit local EPFs in single family zones, with modifications to Sections 3 and 4 to incorporate the newly adopted R-4 zone into the amendments as follows: Section 3 of the ordinance: 19.60.050(1) add R-4 to the permitted use matrix with the same designations shown in Ordinance 20-009, and showing that EPFs in the R-4 zone have an "E"designation, and Section 4 of the ordinance: 19.90.020(B) add "R-4"to the list of zones where EPFs shall not be permitted. Ms. Barlow briefly went over the city-initiated code text amendment as noted,and said that once approved,it will reflect the newly established R4 zone.There were no public comments. Vote by acclamation:in favor:unanimous. Opposed: none. Motion carried. 6. First Reading Ordinance 20-011 Amending SVMC 9.20 Motorized Personal Transportation Device - Erik Lamb After City Clerk Bainbridge read the ordinance title,it was moved by Deputy Mayor Peetz and seconded to advance Ordinance 20-011, amending chapter 9.20 SVMC, to a second reading. Deputy City Attorney Lamb introduced Legal Intern Carly Johnson who then went over the proposed ordinance amending the chapter concerning motorized personal transportation devices. She noted there were some concerns voiced by citizens about distinguished between the three classes of bikes and that she spoke with the City's Senior Traffic Engineer,and she went over those proposed changes as shown in yellow highlights. She also noted that in follow-up to a previous Council question, there have been no bike infractions issued over the last Regular Formal Council Meeting: 09-08-2020 Page 3 of 5 Approved by Council: DRAFT three years.Mayor Wick invited public comment and it was noted there was one person who signed up for comment: Ms. Barb Howard, Spokane Valley: mentioned scooters on sidewalks and spoke about some sidewalks at the Eagle Point Apartments that are not being maintained. Mr. Lamb said that is not part of what this ordinance addresses. Vote by acclamation: in favor: unanimous. Opposed: none. Motion carried. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT OPPORTUNITY 121: Mayor Wick stated that the same rules apply for this public comment opportunity as for the previous public comment opportunity. It was noted three people signed up to speak: Ms.Diana Wilhite,Spokane Valley: said she was unable to speak previously due to her computer problems; she spoke about encouraging Council to be pro-active and establish rules when it comes to public comments during council meetings, and said that the governing body has the right to establish rules for conducting business. Ms. Barb Howard, Spokane Valley: mentioned that Mr. West's previous comments addressed something that happened a long time ago, and she made other comments about a process of getting a protection order by making false statements. Mr.Bob West,Spokane Valley: said he apologizes for his initial pointed comments but said he feels he had a right to defend himself and that Councilmembers should maintain the dignity and respect of their offices. As he mentioned Councilmember Higgins at this point,Councilmember Higgins called for a point of order and stated that Mr.West should keep his comments to the business of the City. Mayor Wick said he would allow Mr. West to continue for now. Mr. West continued speaking about statements that occurred during the August 11 Council meeting including verbal attacks by other members of the public, and that such attacks must be addressed and a policy adopted immediately; that respect is a two-way street and the personal attacks must end. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS: 7. Estimated Revenues and Expenditures,2021 Budget—Chelsie Taylor Finance Director Taylor explained that tonight is the second occasion where Council will discuss the 2021 budget,and by the time Council is scheduled to adopt that budget,Council will have had an opportunity to discuss it on eight separate occasions, including three public hearings to gather citizen input. As noted in her PowerPoint, Director Taylor mentioned the total appropriations of$93.1 million; mentioned the FTE (full time equivalent staff member) is proposed to be 95.25,which is the same as 2020; she mentioned the one vacant position being repurposed to engineering and one vacant engineer position being repurposed to a Housing &Homeless Services Coordinator in the City Manager Department. Ms. Taylor explained that during the budget workshop,Council decided against creating a new Housing&Homeless Services division but asked about the ability to repurpose a vacant position, and that staff determined that a vacant engineer position would be repurposed for that use; she added that this will also be included in a future budget amendment for a partial year in 2020.Ms.Taylor went over the revenues in the general fund and mentioned that the two largest sources are sales tax and property tax, and that the property tax levy is not proposed to include the 1% increase authorized by state law. She also went over the expenditures in the general fund; she mentioned other funds such as the motor vehicle fuel tax, telephone taxes, and hotel/motel taxes; she mentioned challenges include COVID-19 revenue impacts,and declining revenues in the Street O&M fund, and then went over the future schedule for Council budget discussions and adoption. 8.Advance Agenda—Mayor Wick Deputy Mayor Peetz mentioned the Trunk or Treat idea which is currently on the pending list on the advance agenda and if we might want to start looking into how this might be accomplished. Mr. Calhoun said he will have Chief Ellis make a brief report to give a sense of what the Police Department is planning regarding that event. Councilmembers concurred. Councilmember Thompson mentioned the impact of large vehicles on our roads; said she is not advocating for an impact fee but would like to find out what impact these large vehicles have on our roads. As it appeared most of Council agreed to include the topic on an advance agenda, Mr. Calhoun said he will speak with staff in engineering concerning this topic. The idea was Regular Formal Council Meeting: 09-08-2020 Page 4 of 5 Approved by Council: DRAFT mentioned of having a representative from STA give Council an update;Councilmember Haley said as the Central City Line is consuming a lot of time she suggested waiting until after the first of the year, and said she will find out more at her meeting tomorrow. There was also Council consensus to have something as quickly as possible to address public comments, and Mr. Calhoun said he will talk with City Attorney Driskell about possibly adding that to the 15th agenda. 9.Finance Depaitinent Monthly Report This report was for information only and was not reported or discussed. 10. Police Department Monthly Report This report was for information only and was not reported or discussed. CITY MANAGER COMMENTS City Manager Calhoun mentioned that he anticipates having more conversations with Council regarding the CARES Act funding,even though we have had about six administrative reports on this already;he noted that last week the Governor announced there will be a second round of funding and it appears our city will get another$1.4 million,although there are no details yet from the Department of Commerce other than the deadline for that will be November 30. Mr. Calhoun mentioned that the deadline for the first round might be extended.Regarding this second round,Mr. Calhoun said he hopes we can proceed with as few Council touches as possible in order to get the funds out as quickly as possible to help our community. Mr.Calhoun also noted that next week we will hear from the 25 applicants for outside agency funding so it will be a full meeting. EXECUTIVE SESSION: 11.Pending Litigation [RCW 42.30. 110(1)(i)] It was moved by Deputy Mayor Peetz, seconded and unanimously agreed to adjourn into executive session for no later than thirty minutes to discuss pending litigation. Council adjourned into executive session at 7:29 p.m. At approximately 7:55 p.m.,Councilmember Haley returned to open session and announced that the executive session would be extended to 8:15 p.m. At 8:10 p.m. Mayor Wick declared Council out of executive session, at which time it was moved, seconded and unanimously agreed to adjourn. ATTEST: Ben Wick,Mayor Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Regular Formal Council Meeting: 09-08-2020 Page 5 of 5 Approved by Council: CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: September 22, 2020 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ® consent ❑ old business ® new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Proposed Resolution 20-013: Street Vacation 2020-0002: GOVERNING LEGISLATION: Chapter 22.140 Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC); RCW 35A.47.020 and chapter 35.79 RCW PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: None BACKGROUND: The owner, Diamond Rock Financial LLC/TCF Properties, has requested the vacation of 470 feet in length of Montgomery Avenue and 195 feet of Bessie Road. The right- of-way section is unimproved and ranges from 25 to 60 feet in width. The total area to be vacated for Montgomery Avenue is approximately 18,885 square feet, and the area for Bessie Road is approximately 4,631 square feet. The portion of right-of-way proposed to be vacated is located between Vista Road (west), Sargent Road (east) and Mansfield Avenue (south). The undeveloped right-of-way is adjacent to nine parcels (45074.2309, 45074.9084, 45074.0223, 45074.0222, 45074.0221, 45074.0220, 45074.0219, 45077.0002 and 45071.9089). SP 91-733 45071.9089 I—F 2-5077.0002 _ !- I 439' TMUN2'COMERY AVENUE 30' ROW 16. ' V` 1 \ - 26' 290' 45074-0221 45074_0221 45074.0219 45074.0245 908 h 45074.0222 I ^ °� I ` 8 5 4 3 2 1 ca SP 83-24i1 _ — — 45074.0223 216' a 8 9 10 11 1 12 13 c. 45074.92391 :_, 160' ry VISTA GARDENS NO. 4 c I BLOCK 1 25' ROW I— ti ' N 41'' ` 22'- 4 — f 50' RC — —MANSFIELD AVENUE W E 25 GAS EASEMENT t I I 1 1 i \ S 7'ER SYLVI.A COURT ADOTION EXHIBIT 1 STREET VACATION EXHIBIT PRDJ#: 2D-2E59 BESSIE & MONTGOMERY ili A i'e DATE: 07/30/20 WHIPPLE CONSULTING ENGINEERS DRAWN: EJW GIRL AND TRAI'EPORPATIOH ENGINEERING APPROVED: DAD SPOKANE VALLEY, WASHINGT❑N 12528 NORTH SULLIVAN ROAD SCALE: 1.-I DO! SPOKANE VALLEY.WASHINGTON 99216 PH 509-28 32 61 7 FA(:509-926-0227 OPTIONS: Approve Resolution 20-013 setting the date for a Public Hearing on the proposed street vacation; or take other appropriate action. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Approve Resolution 20-013, setting October 22, 2020 as the date for a public hearing before the Planning Commission on street vacation application STV-2020-0002. [Approved as part of the Consent Agenda or may be removed and discussed separately.] BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: None STAFF CONTACT: Connor Lange, Planner ATTACHMENT: Resolution 20-013 DRAFT CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY SPOKANE COUNTY,WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO.20-013 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SETTING THE PUBLIC HEARING DATE AND TIME FOR THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO CONSIDER STREET VACATION REQUEST STV- 2020-0002 PURSUANT TO RCW 35.79.010; AND OTHER MATTERS RELATED THERETO. WHEREAS,the City of Spokane Valley has received a Street Vacation request(File #STV-2020- 0002) from property owner Diamond Rock Financial LLC/TCF Properties for the vacation of 470 feet in length of Montgomery Avenue and 195 feet of Bessie Road.The right-of-way is unimproved and is located between Vista Road to the west, Sargent Road to the east and Mansfield Avenue to the south. The undeveloped right-of-way is adjacent to nine parcels (45074.2309,45074.9084,45074.0223,45074.0222, 45074.0221,45074.0220,45074.0219,45077.0002 and 45071.9089). WHEREAS, RCW 35.79.010 specifies that the legislative authority shall establish by resolution the time when a Street Vacation application shall be considered by the legislative authority or a committee thereof; and WHEREAS, chapter 22.140 Spokane Valley Municipal Code(SVMC)establishes regulations and procedures for the processing of vacations of public streets(hereafter referred to as"Street Vacation"); and WHEREAS, SVMC 22.140.030 specifies that the Planning Commission shall conduct the public hearing required pursuant to RCW 35.79.010; and shall develop and forward a recommendation for a requested Street Vacation to the City Council. NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley, Spokane County,Washington,as follows: Section 1. Establishment of Public Hearing Date and Time for STV-2020-0002. The required public hearing for Street Vacation Request STV-2020-0002 shall be conducted before the Spokane Valley Planning Commission, October 22, 2020 beginning at 6:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as practical. The hearing will take place in the City Council Chambers at the Spokane Valley City Hall if allowed by law,or if in-person meetings are still prohibited due to the COVID-19 pandemic,via ZOOM meeting, and will be hosted by the City of Spokane Valley, 10210 East Sprague Avenue, Spokane Valley,Washington 99206. Section 2. Effective Date. This Resolution shall be in full force and effect upon adoption. Adopted this 22"d day of September,2020. CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY ATTEST: Ben Wick,Mayor Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Approved as to Form: Office of the City Attorney Resolution No.20-013 Establishment of Public Hearing Date and Time for STV-2020-0002 Page 1 of 1 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: September 22, 2020 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ® consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Motion Consideration —Set public hearing date for the 2021 Budget. GOVERNING LEGISLATION: State budget law. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: None. BACKGROUND: State law requires the City to a set a public hearing date to review the 2021 Budget, and Staff is proposing October 27, 2020. This public hearing is included in the eight separate opportunities the Council will have to discuss the budget, including public hearings to gather input from citizens: • August 4 Council Budget Workshop • September 8 Admin report: Estimated 2021 revenues and expenditures • September 22 Public hearing #1 on 2021 revenues and expenditures • October 13 City Manager's presentation of preliminary 2021 Budget • October 27 Public hearing #2 on 2021 Budget • November 10 First reading on ordinance adopting the 2021 Budget • November 24 Public Hearing #3 on 2021 Budget • November 24 Second reading on ordinance adopting the 2021 Budget OPTIONS: The Council could choose to set the public hearing on another date but the recommendation will keep us on schedule to adopt the budget on November 24, 2020. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to set the 2021 Budget hearing date for October 27, 2020. [Approved as part of the Consent Agenda, or may be removed and discussed separately.] BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: This is part of the 2021 Budget development process leading to its scheduled adoption on November 24, 2024. STAFF CONTACT: Chelsie Taylor, Finance Director ATTACHMENTS: None. CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: September 22,2020 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ®new business ❑public hearing ❑ information❑admin.report ❑pending legislation ❑executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Second Reading — proposed Ordinance 20-011 amending chapter 9.20 SVMC,motorized personal transportation devices. GOVERNING LEGISLATION: Title 46 Motor Vehicles, Revised Code of Washington (RCW); RCW 46.04.336;RCW 46.20.500; RCW 46.61.710;RCW 46.61.715; Chapter 9.20 SVMC PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: November 16, 2004: Passed Ordinance 04-048 addressing scooters; amended by Ordinance 07-005 passed by Council March 27, 2007, codified as chapter 9.20 SVMC. April 23, 2019: Information Only Item regarding LIME Bike and Scooter-share program. June 30, 2020: Administrative Report regarding proposed Ordinance 20-011 amending chapter 9.20 SVMC. On September 8, 2020, Council heard the first reading of proposed Ordinance 20-011 to adopt amendments to chapter 9.20 SVMC. BACKGROUND: Generally Use of electric-assisted bike and motorized foot scooter share programs, such as LIME, have increased significantly in Washington state in recent years. Companies like LIME provide electric-assisted bikes and motorized foot scooters to customers through smart phone apps. Additionally, Washingtonians have purchased electric-assisted bicycles throughout the years, contributing to the presence of these devices throughout the state. In response to the increased use of electric-assisted bikes and motorized foot scooters share programs, the Washington State Legislature enacted legislation over the past two years regulating such use. The legislation,amending RCW Title 46,generally provides the following: 1. Broadens the definition of motorized foot scooter and provides a definition of each class of electric-assisted bicycle. 2. Amends existing state regulations regarding motorized transportation devices by making clear that they apply to motorized foot scooters as well. Such regulations include setting the minimum operating age at 16, setting standard speed limits of 15 mph, prohibiting sidewalk use for motorized scooters and Class 3 electric-assisted bicycles, and identifying applicable motorized foot scooter parking regulations. These regulations may be modified by local law, but if not modified, are the default applicable law for use of motorized foot scooters. 3. Regulates where each class of electric-assisted bicycles may be used, such as sidewalks, right-of-ways, and bike lanes, and authorizes local jurisdictions to further regulate the use of electric-assisted bicycles. 4. Authorizes local jurisdictions to contract for "shared" scooter and bicycle programs and to establish applicable limits on such programs. Staff brought forward an administrative report on June 30,2020,with a draft Ordinance amending chapter 9.20 SVMC, aligning the code with the new changes to state law. In addition to minor technical corrections,the proposed Ordinance: 1. Amends the definitions to be consistent with state definitions. 2. Prohibits parking of motorized personal transportation devices on sidewalks where such parking obstructs normal pedestrian use, and makes any bike/scooter share company responsible for the illegal parking of their devices. 3. Allows use of motorized personal transportation devices in bike lanes on streets with speed limits greater than 25 mph. 4. Retains the prohibition of using motorized personal transportation devices on sidewalks and public trails. Summary of First Reading Discussion During the Administrative Report, City Council expressed concerns to proposed changes regarding certain locations where a motorized transportation device may be used. First, Council was concerned with prohibiting motorized foot scooters and electric-assisted bicycles on streets with a speed limit greater than 25 mph that have no bike lane. Second, Council was concerned with prohibiting sidewalk use of motorized foot scooters and electric-assisted bicycles in areas where street use is also prohibited. Finally, Council also had concerns about prohibiting motorized foot scooters and electric-assisted bicycles on public trails such as the Appleway Trail and the Centennial Trail. Ultimately, Council felt that the proposed changes could limit the utility of electric-assisted bicycle and scooter use throughout the City. Since the Administrative Report, staff has received comments from multiple members of the public reflecting concerns about limiting electric assisted bicycles by class on the Appleway Trail and Centennial Trail. Citizens indicated that often they need some motorized assistance for longer rides,that in many instances the class distinctions are not clear during purchase (especially if e-bikes are purchased online), and that they do not see any practical difference between the various classes of e-bikes and other non-motorized bicycles. After staff discussed Council's concerns and citizen comments with the City's Senior Traffic Engineer, staff proposed the following changes to draft Ordinance 20-011 at the September 8, 2020 First Reading hearing: 1. Include all classes of electric-assisted bicycles under the definition of motorized personal transportation devices. Previously, only classes 2 and 3 were listed under the definition. Including all three classes under the definition allows the City to regulate the classes equally, making enforcement and regulation easier. 2. Prohibits sidewalk use, but allows motorized personal transportation devices equipped with an electric motor (i.e. motorized scooters and electric-assisted bicycles) to use the sidewalk when a street has no bike lane or other shared use path. However, permitted motorized personal transportation devices must yield to pedestrians and not exceed a speed of 10 mph. 3. Prohibits trail use,but allows motorized personal transportation devices equipped with an electric motor (i.e. motorized scooters and electric-assisted bicycles) to use trails provided the user or rider does not exceed 15 mph. 4. Set the violation penalty at$50. OPTIONS: Move to approve Ordinance No. 20-011 with or without amendments. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to approve Ordinance 20-011, amending chapter 9.20 SVMC as proposed. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: There are no projected budget or financial impacts. STAFF CONTACT: Erik Lamb,Deputy City Attorney; Carly Johnson,Legal Intern. ATTACHMENTS: Draft Ordinance amending chapter 9.20 SVMC. DRAFT CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY SPOKANE COUNTY,WASHINGTON ORDINANCE 20-011 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON,ADOPTING AMENDMENTS TO CHAPTER 9.20 OF THE SPOKANE VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE TO UPDATE DEFINITIONS AND REGULATIONS RELATING TO MOTORIZED PERSONAL TRANSPORTATION DEVICES, AND OTHER MATTERS RELATING THERETO. WHEREAS, the City of Spokane Valley previously adopted chapter 9.20 of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code relating to the use of motorized personal transportation devices; and WHEREAS, the use of motorized personal transportation devises has become more popular due to motorized scooter and electric-assisted bicycle share programs; and WHEREAS, the Washington State Legislature amended Title 46 of the Revised Code of Washington responding to the increased use of motorized personal transportation devices and motorized scooter share programs; and WHEREAS,the changes in state law affect the current chapter 9.20 SVMC; and WHEREAS,the City desires to make chapter 9.20 SVMC consistent with state law and responsive to the increased use of motorized scooter and electric-assisted bicycle share programs; and WHEREAS,the proposed changes are in the best interest of the health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of the City. NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley, Spokane County, Washington,do ordain as follows: Section 1. Amendment. Chapter 9.20 of the SVMC is hereby amended as follows: 9.20.010 Purpose The purpose and intent of this chapter is to implement local regulations governing the use of motorized personal transportation devices on city streets, sidewalks, trails, bike paths, and other public property. 9.20.0210 Definitions. The following definitions are applicable in this chapter unless the context otherwise requires: AE. "Approved bicycle helmet" means a head covering designed for safety that meets or exceeds the required safety standards adopted by the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) 15 USCS 6004, or Z-00.4 set by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI), the Snell Foundation, the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), or such subsequent nationally recognized standard for helmet performance as may be adopted by the City of Spokane Valley. The helmet shall be equipped with a neck or chin strap that shall be securely fastened while the motorized personal transportation device is in motion. B . "Approved motorcycle helmet" means a protective covering for the head consisting of a hard outer shell,padding adjacent to and inside the outer shell, and a neck or chin strap type retention system,with a Ordinance 20-011 Amending SVMC 9.20 Page 1 of 5 DRAFT label required by the Federal Consumer Product Safety Commission as adopted by the Code of Federal Regulations, 16 CFR Section 1203. C. "Electric-assisted bicycles," "class 1 electric-assisted bicycle," "class 2 electric-assisted bicycle," and "class 3 electric-assisted bicycle" shall have the meanings as set forth in RCW 46.04.169 as now adopted or hereafter amended. LSD. "Modified or enhanced" means that any of the settings or equipment of the motorized personal transportation device, including but not limited to those settings or equipment that affects displacement, horsepower, or muffler effect have been altered to achieve greater power, higher speed, and/or better performance than possible when the unit was delivered from the factory for sale. EA. "Motorized foot scooter" is defined as set forth in RCW 46.04.336, as now adopted or hereafter amended. means a device with no more than two 10 inch or smaller diameter wheels, has handlebars, is designed to be stood upon (but may have a scat), and is powered by an internal combustion engine or electric motor that is capable of propelling the device with or without human propulsion. FG. "Motorized personal transportation device" shall be a motorized device for personal transportation deemed to include motorized foot scooters, motorized skateboards, pocket motorcycles, class 1, class 2, and class 3 electric-assisted bicycles,and all other similar devices,but shall exclude motorized wheelchairs, motor driven cycles, mopeds, class 1 electric assisted bicycles, motorcycles, and electronic personal assistive mobility devices. G . "Motorized skateboard" means every device with a platform on which the rider or operator balances, the platform having two or more sets of wheels beneath it,propelled by an attached or auxiliary electric or gasoline motor. H. "Scooter share program," and "bike share program" mean a person offering shared motorized foot scooters or electric-assisted bicycles for hire. I. "Sidewalk"for purposes of this chapter only is defined as set forth in RCW 46.04.540 as now adopted or hereafter amended. W."Street,"for the purposes of this chapter only,means the entire width between the curb boundary lines, including any designated bike lanes and the shoulder, of every way publicly maintained in the City of Spokane Valley when any part thereof is open to the use of the public for purposes of vehicular travel or parking. 9.20.0230 Duty to obey rules of the road. Any person operating a motorized personal transportation device on a street shall obey all rules of the road applicable to motor vehicles, as well as the commands of official traffic control signals, signs, and other control devices applicable to motor vehicles, unless otherwise directed by a law enforcement official or their designee. Every person operating a motorized personal transportation device on a street is granted all of the rights and is subject to all of the duties and responsibilities applicable to the driver of a motor vehicle pursuant to Chapter 308-330 WAC, except WAC 308-330-500 through 308-330-540 relating to bicycle licensing, as adopted or hereafter amended, a copy of which will be kept on file in the city clerk's office, and pursuant to Chapter 9.05 SVMC except as to those provisions thereof which by their very nature can have no application. 9.20.0340 Requirements for operating motorized personal transportation devices. A.Minimum Age.No person shall operate a motorized personal transportation device on a street, alley,or other public area unless such person is 16 years of age or older. Ordinance 20-011 Amending SVMC 9.20 Page 2 of 5 DRAFT B. Passengers—Towing. Only one person shall occupy a motorized personal transportation device at one time.An operator of a motorized personal transportation device shall not transport passengers or tow other devices or persons behind a motorized personal transportation device. C. Helmet Required. Any person operating a motorized personal transportation device propelled by an internal combustion engine upon any street, alley or other public place in the City shall wear an approved motorcycle helmet designed for safety on his or her head and shall have the neck or chin strap of the helmet fastened securely while the motorized personal transportation device is in motion or operation. D. Lighting Required. 1.All motorized personal transportation devices,when in use on any street,alley,or other public area, shall be equipped with a functioning lamp on the front that shall emit a white light visible from a distance of at least 500 feet to the front. 2.All motorized personal transportation devices,when in use on any street,alley or other public area, shall be equipped with a functioning red reflector on the rear of the motorized personal transportation device, of a type approved by the Washington State Patrol,that is visible from all distances up to 600 feet to the rear when directly in front of lawful lower beams of the head lamps on a motor vehicle. A lamp that emits a red light visible from a distance of 500 feet to the rear may be used in addition to the red reflector.A light-emitting diode (LED)flashing tail light that is visible from a distance of 500 feet to the rear may likewise be used in addition to the red reflector. 3. All motorized personal transportation devices in operation on a street shall be equipped with a stop lamp or lamps on the rear of the motorized personal transportation device which shall display a red or amber light,or any shade of color between red and amber,visible from a distance of not less than 300 feet to the rear in normal sunlight, and which shall be actuated upon application of a service brake. E.Muffler Required.Motorized personal transportation devices powered by an internal combustion engine shall have a properly functioning engine muffler attached and constantly operational during use of the motorized personal transportation device to prevent a noise nuisance as prohibited by SVMC 7.05.040(0). The use of a cutout, bypass, or similar muffler elimination device is prohibited on all motorized personal transportation devices that are powered by an internal combustion engine. F. Brake Required. Motorized personal transportation devices shall be equipped with a rear brake which, when applied,enables the operator to make the braked wheel(s)skid on dry,level,clean pavement. G. Modifications Prohibited. Motorized personal transportation devices operated within the City of Spokane Valley shall not be modified or enhanced in design or construction from the specifications as provided by the manufacturer or as otherwise required by Spokane Valley Municipal Code provisions or the Revised Code of Washington. 9.20.0450 Prohibited areas. A. Parks. All prohibitions and regulations applicable to motorized vehicles in City parks as set forth in chapter 6.05 SVMC shall apply to Mmotorized personal transportation devices, and without limitation, motorized personal transportation devices are prohibited from all City parks, except (1) in public streets, parking areas,parking lots or such designated areas where motorized vehicular use is allowed, and (2) as otherwise provided in SVMC 9.20.050(C). Use within such areas shall be subject to all applicable state and local laws, including, but not limited to, Title 46 RCW and chapter 6.05 SVMC. pursuant to SVMC 6.05.070(G). Violations of this restriction are subject to the specific penalties set forth in SVMC 6.05.090 and 6.05.100. Ordinance 20-011 Amending SVMC 9.20 Page 3 of 5 DRAFT B. Sidewalks. It is unlawful for any person to operate or ride a motorized personal transportation device on any sidewalk within the City of Spokane Valley city limits, except motorized personal transportation devices equipped with an electric motor when -a street has no bike lane, provided that pedestrians shall have the right of way, and provided further that the device does not exceed a speed greater than 10 miles per hour while on the sidewalk. C. Public Trails. Unless otherwise specified in this subsection,lit is unlawful for any person to operate or ride a motorized personal transportation device on any public trails. , including the Centennial Trail. A person may operate or ride a personal transportation device equipped with an electric motor at a speed no greater than 15 miles per hour on the Appleway Trail and the Centennial Trail. In the event of any conflict between this subsection 9.20.050(C)and any provision of chapter 6.05 SVMC,this subsection shall control. within the City of Spokane-Valley City lif its D.Certain Streets.It is unlawful for any person to operate or ride a motorized personal transportation device on any street with a speed limit greater than 25 miles per hour,except within designated bike lanes on such streets. E. Parking — Generally. Parking of motorized personal transportation devices is prohibited on all public sidewalks when such parking interferes, impairs, obstructs,blocks, or impedes the free and full use of the sidewalk. Any motorized personal transportation device parked illegally shall be subject to removal by the City or its contractor. F. Parking — Scooter or bike share. Any scooter or bike share company responsible for or owning a motorized personal transportation device parked illegally pursuant to this section shall be deemed to have committed a traffic infraction subject to the penalties set forth in this chapter. 9.20.0560 Applicability of other traffic laws. The following criminal traffic laws shall apply to the operation of motorized personal transportation devices within the City of Spokane Valley: A.Negligent Driving—First Degree—RCW 46.61.5249,as adopted by reference in WAC 308-330-425,as adopted or hereafter amended, and kept on file in the city clerk's office, and pursuant to Chapter 9.05 SVMC. B.Negligent Driving—Second Degree—RCW 46.61.525, as adopted by reference in WAC 308-330-425, as adopted or hereafter amended, and kept on file in the city clerk's office, and pursuant to Chapter 9.05 SVMC. C. Reckless Driving — RCW 46.61.500, as adopted by reference in WAC 308-330-425, as adopted or hereafter amended,and kept on file in the city clerk's office,and pursuant to Chapter 9.05 SVMC. D. Driving Under the Influence — RCW 46.61.502, as adopted by reference in WAC 308-330-425, as adopted or hereafter amended, and kept on file in the city clerk's office, and pursuant to Chapter 9.05 SVMC. E.Driver Under 21 Consuming Alcohol—RCW 46.61.503,as adopted by reference in WAC 308-330-425, as adopted or hereafter amended, and kept on file in the city clerk's office, and pursuant to Chapter 9.05 SVMC. 9.20.0670 Dealer notice required. All persons and/or establishments in the City of Spokane Valley involved in the retail sale,ef-lease,rental, or "sharing," of motorized personal transportation devices shall provide to each purchaser, renter, or user of said motorized personal transportation device written notice of the regulations, restrictions, and Ordinance 20-011 Amending SVMC 9.20 Page 4 of 5 DRAFT requirements of this chapter prior to completing the sale, er—lease, rental, or "sharing" of said motorized personal transportation device. 9.20.0780 Violation—Penalty. Except as otherwise provided herein,Aany person violating any provision of this chapter,except for SVMC 9.20.010(B), shall be deemed to have committed a (Class 2 or Class 2 pl s c uft costs and f es) traffic infraction and shall be subject to a penalty of$50.00. However, conduct that constitutes a violation of a rule of the road, or constitutes a criminal traffic offense,may also be charged as such and is subject to the maximum penalties allowed for such an offense or offenses. A violation of this chapter for a minor under the age of 16 shall result in a referral to the Spokane County juvenile justice system for resolution. Section 2. Other sections unchanged. All other provisions of Title 9 SVMC not specifically referenced hereto shall remain in full force and effect. Section 3. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance shall be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section,sentence,clause,or phrase of this Ordinance. Section 4. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect five days after publication of this Ordinance or summary therefor in the official newspaper of the City of Spokane Valley as provided by law. Passed by the City Council this 22'day of September,2020 Ben Wick,Mayor ATTEST: Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Approved as to Form: Office of the City Attorney Date of Publication: Effective Date: Ordinance 20-011 Amending SVMC 9.20 Page 5 of 5 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: September 22, 2020 Department Director Approval: El Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ®Admin. Report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Nonconforming Use Code Text Amendment—CTA-2020-0003 GOVERNING LEGISLATION: SVMC 17.80.150; SVMC 19.30.040; and SVMC 19.25; RCW 36.70A.106; and 36.70A.200; WAC 365-196-550 PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: None BACKGROUND: The proposed amendment is a City-initiated code text amendment to the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) chapter 19.25 SVMC to prohibit the expansion of a nonconforming use onto adjacent lots and to clarify that residential uses located in nonresidential zones are permitted uses. Generally, nonconforming uses are uses that began as lawful uses, but which became nonconforming when regulations were later changed. For example, if a business lawfully began operations under commercial zoning, but the zoning later changed to residential zoning where commercial uses were prohibited, the business would be considered a lawful nonconforming use. Accordingly, they may be incompatible with surrounding uses and may create conflicts with later uses that are allowed under new zoning. Further, allowing expansive nonconforming uses undercuts the City's Comprehensive Plan and zoning. For this reason, generally, nonconforming uses are limited in how they can expand since such expansion may create greater conflicts with the surrounding uses. Chapter 19.25 SVMC regulates nonconforming uses and structures. Appendix A Definitions of the SVMC defines a nonconforming use as, "A lot, use, building, or structure, which was legal when commenced or built, but which does not conform to subsequently enacted or amended regulations pursuant to Chapter 19.25 SVMC." Chapter 19.25 SVMC defines what is considered a legal nonconforming use or structure and provides conditions for how a legal nonconforming use may continue and be expanded. Generally, if a use or structure was legally permitted under the applicable regulations at the time the use or structure came into existence and began lawful operations, the use or structure is considered a legal nonconforming use if the current regulations and amendments to regulations otherwise prohibit such use. See SVMC 19.25.010. Legal nonconforming uses are allowed to continue as is until the use is discontinued or abandoned for a period of 12 consecutive months. See SVMC 19.25.020. The City's nonconforming use regulations were originally adopted in 2007 by Ordinance No. 07-015 and modified by Ordinance Nos. 09-036, 10-016, and 10-023. Of note, the primary amendments occurred in Ordinance No. 10-016 in 2010, by allowing nonconforming uses to expand on properties outside of the original boundaries of the use if certain criteria were met. Other than minor housekeeping changes, no substantive amendments have been made to the nonconforming use regulations since 2010. However, allowing nonconforming uses to expand to adjacent parcels circumvents the intent of the Comprehensive Plan and zoning as the use becomes more invested at that location, rather than discontinuing the use, and moving to an appropriately zoned location. CTA 2020-0003 proposes to remove the criteria which allows for expansion outside of the original property boundaries, but allow expansion on site, and as modified by the Planning Commission allow expansion onto properties commonly owned at the time subject to criteria. The language proposed rolls back the criteria and returns the development regulations to that language previously implemented prior to Ordinance No. 10-016. During the 2016 Comprehensive Plan Legislative Update, minor changes were made in chapter 19.25 SVMC that provided that a residential use in a nonresidential zone was a legal nonconforming use. Previously, the language provided that residential uses in nonresidential zones "shall not be deemed nonconforming and shall be permitted as a legal use." The implication of the change to those residential uses is that if they are damaged by fire, flood, or neglect, and the damage represents more than 80% of market value of the structure,they may not be rebuilt. This has created a financing issue for affected single family homes. The language proposed returns the language to the previous verbiage and identifies the residential use as a permitted use not subject to the nonconforming use regulations. Staff will discuss the regulations as they exist and discuss the desired code change. The Planning Commission (Commission) conducted a study session on the proposed CTA at the July 23, 2020 meeting. On August 13, 2020, the Commission conducted a public hearing and deliberations. At that meeting, the Commission voted 6-0 to recommend to the City Council that CTA-2020-0003 be approved with modifications. The Commission felt that nonconforming uses should be allowed to expand onto adjacent properties if the properties were under the same ownership at the time the use on the original lot became nonconforming if certain criteria were met. This is consistent with current code language. On August 27, 2020, the Commission adopted Findings and Recommendation. OPTIONS: Consensus to move the request forward to a first ordinance reading, with or without modifications; or take other action deemed appropriate. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Council consensus to move the code text amendment forward to an ordinance first reading as recommended by staff; as recommended by the Planning Commission; or as modified by Council. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: N/A STAFF CONTACT: Lori Barlow, AICP, Senior Planner, Community and Public Works Dept. ATTACHMENTS: A. Draft CTA-2020-0003 code text language B. PowerPoint Presentation C. Planning Commission's Findings of Fact and recommendation D. Planning Commission Meeting Minutes: 7/23/2020, 8/13/2020, and 8/27/2020 E. Staff Report CTA-2020-0003 Draft Draft Chapter 19.25 NONCONFORMING USES AND STRUCTURES Sections: 19.25.010 Applicability. 19.25.020 Continuing lawful use of property. 19.25.030 Nonconforming structures. 19.25.040 Completion of permanent structures. 19.25.010 Applicability. A. Legal nonconforming uses and structures include: 1.Any use which does not conform with the present regulations of the zoning district in which it is located that was in existence and in continuous and lawful operation prior to the adoption of SVMC Title 19; 2.Any permanent structure in existence and lawfully constructed at the time of any amendment to SVMC Title 19,which by such amendment is placed in a zoning district wherein it is not otherwise permitted and has since been in regular and continuous use; 3.Any permanent structure lawfully used or constructed that was in existence at the time of annexation into the City and which has since been in regular and continuous use; 4.Existing legally established single-family residential structures uses located in a nonresidential zoning district shall not be deemed nonconforming and shall be permitted as a legal structure. B. Structures or uses deemed nonconforming only pursuant to the SMA(Chapter 90.58 RCW)and the City SMP (Chapter 21.50 SVMC,Shoreline Regulations) shall comply with the provisions of SVMC 21.50.160. (Ord. 16-018 § 6(Att.B),2016). 19.25.020 Continuing lawful use of property. A. The lawful use of land at the time of passage of SVMC Title 19,or any amendments hereto,may be continued, unless the use is discontinued or abandoned for a period of 12 consecutive months;except that any nonconforming use discontinued as a result of foreclosure or judicial proceedings,including probate, shall be permitted to continue for a period not to exceed 24 months. The right to continue the nonconforming use shall transfer to all successive interests in the property.Discontinuance of a nonconforming use shall commence on the actual act or date of discontinuance. B. A nonconforming use that is abandoned or discontinued shall not be replaced with another nonconforming use. C. A nonconforming use which has not been abandoned or discontinued may be replaced with a conforming use or another nonconforming use when the use meets the following criteria: 1. The new use is not less conforming than the prior use. This determination shall be made by the city manager or designee; 2. The proposed use does not place a greater demand on transportation and other public facilities than the original use;and 3. The proposed use does not adversely impact the use of neighboring property. D.A nonconforming use in residential zones may be expanded only within the boundaries of the original lot and any adjacent lot having the same ownership as the lot at the time the use on the original lot became nonconforming,if: 1. The expanded use does not degrade the transportation level of service greater than the original use; 2. The expanded use does not adversely impact the use of neighboring property; CTA-2020-0003 Page 1 August 18,2020 Draft 3.Any transfer of ownership on adjacent lots was made concurrently with the transfer of ownership of the lot on which the nonconforming use is located as part of a single transaction;and 4. The expansion does not create additional development opportunities on adjacent lots that would not otherwise exist. 5. The use is not a single-family residential use. E.A nonconforming use in a nonresidential zoning district may be expanded only within the boundaries of the original lot and any lot adjacent to the original lot,if: 1. The original lot and the"expansion"lot arc in the same zoning district; 2. The expanded use does not degrade the transportation level of service greater than the original use; and 3. The expanded use does not adversely impact the use of neighboring property. E.E.Residential lots made nonconforming relative to dimensional requirements shall be deemed conforming if the use is allowed in the respective zoning district. F.&Nonconforming uses that do not provide the required number of off-street parking spaces pursuant to current standards shall not be required to meet parking standards. GFF.Any nonconforming use damaged by fire,flood,neglect,or act of nature may be replaced if: 1.Restoration of the use is initiated within 12 months;and 2. The damage represents less than 80 percent of market value. HI.Any nonconforming use changed to a conforming use shall not be permitted to convert to a nonconforming use. (Ord. 17-004 §3,2017;Ord. 16-018 §6(Att.B),2016). 19.25.030 Nonconforming structures. A nonconforming structure may be expanded in accordance with the following: A. The expansion or alteration does not change the occupancy classification under adopted building codes; B. The expansion or alteration does not create additional nonconformity with respect to building setbacks or lot coverage;additions to nonconforming structures shall meet setbacks required within the zoning district; C. The number of dwelling units does not increase so as to exceed the number of dwelling units permitted within current regulations; D. Off-street loading and/or parking, stormwater facilities,and landscaping shall be provided for the alteration or expansion in accordance with Chapter 22.50 SVMC;and E.Nonconforming structures damaged by fire,flood,neglect,or act of nature may be replaced if: 1.Restoration of the structure is initiated within 12 months;and 2. The damage represents less than 80 percent of market value of the structure. (Ord. 16-018 §6(Att.B), 2016). 19.25.040 Completion of permanent structures. Compliance with Chapter 19.25 SVMC shall not require changes to the plans,construction,or designated use of a structure for which: A.A building permit has been issued or a site plan approved by the City or county prior to incorporation of the City or the effective date of SVMC Title 19;or CTA-2020-0003 Page 2 August 18,2020 Draft B.A substantially complete application for a building permit was accepted by the building official on or before the effective date of the SVMC Title 19;provided,that the building permit shall comply with all applicable regulations on the date that the application was filed and the building permit is issued within 180 days of the effective date of Chapter 19.25 SVMC.(Ord. 16-018 §6(Att.B),2016). CTA-2020-0003 Page 3 August 18,2020 s1j'o' s nel�. Nonconforming Use Regulations CTA-2020-0003 Admin Report City Council Meeting September 22, 2020 Process ..., : • ,., , y 'z Study Session Administrative Report N N •~ July 23, 2020 September 22, 2020 N v O 71 O •- N N ~ '5 - 7i- © Public Hearing 74 Ordinance 1 St Reading CJ W N A N a August 13, 2020 : TBD E° 44 Ordinance 2nd Reading ,� .� Findings of Fact © cit August 27, 2020 P TBD w 4 a Today Chapter 1 9.25 Applicability — Issue: Determines single family residential uses are subject to (Current regulations) nonconforming use regulations. 19.25.010 Applicability A. Legal nonconforming uses and structures include: 1 . Any use which does not conform with the present regulations of the zoning district in which it is located that was in existence and in continuous and lawful operation prior to the adoption of SVMC Title 19; 2. Any permanent structure in existence and lawfully constructed at the time of any amendment to SVMC Title 19, which by such amendment is placed in a zoning district wherein it is not otherwise permitted and has since been in regular and continuous use; 3. Any permanent structure lawfully used or constructed that was in existence at the time of annexation into the City and which !Inc cinre hcen in re ular and continuous use; . Existing legally established single-family residential uses located in a nonresidentia B. Structures or uses deemed nonconforming only pursuant to the SMA Chapter 19.25 Continuing Lawful Issue: If the structure is damaged more than 80% of the market value, it may not Use of the Property (Current regulations) be rebuilt 4 19.25 .020 Continuing lawful use of property. H . Any nonconforming use damaged by fire, flood, neglect, or act of nature may be replaced if: 1 . Restoration of the use is initiated within 12 months . • - 2 . The damage represents less than 80 percent • 11 rket value. Chapter 1 9.2 5 Applicability _ family residential uses are (Proposed regulations) permitted uses and not subject to nonconforming use regulations. I 19.25.010 Applicability A. Legal nonconforming uses and structures include: 1 . Any use which does not conform with the present regulations of the zoning district in which it is located that was in existence and in continuous and lawful operation prior to the adoption of SVMC Title 1 9; 2. Any permanent structure in existence and lawfully constructed at the time of any amendment to SVMC Title 19, which by such amendment is placed in a zoning district wherein it is not otherwise permitted and has since been in regular and continuous use; 3. Any permanent structure lawfully used or constructed that was in existence at the time of annexation into the City and which has since been in regular and continuous use; 4. Ex' '• - • . y established single-family residential structuresuscs located in a no - _ - • '• I oning district shall not be deemed nonconforming and shall be permitted as a legal use. B. Structures or uses deemed nonconforming only pursuant to the SMA NonconformingSingle 190 Sites Identified Family Locations 6 MI .1111111.1 Legend SF dwellings * _ _Wellesley Ave s fysx"°a .iy , ,, _ Zoninge a ,"•�''"� ' MI RC w ■ Centennial Trail Irma' Q u'"'V `Tc a • Euclid E 4c1 Id ® Appleway Trail .j■ Ave Aire * ,„4' 4 Yel■tl Ayr._ 1 Euc dAow N.... Buckeye ] .0.0 4111110 'it t My ■ ',./ 1 P . Manslfeltl Ara 'L .., Intl) ,. F r L ,. ■ r _ MI . Mession Ave - 77 `TrdAve Cam. • i 0.- 4 I �`c. 2 g W ILL a erwd a11, i L o s 5 = 9 � ■ _ - Y ti 8 1st a= Sprague,'t t IraA[n Note: The Map was prepared based on a GIS review of the 3 zoning 1 districts using the Spokane County Assessor Records to identify the Single Family Use. The map should be considered an approximation Chapter 1 9.25 Continuing Lawful Issue: Allows nonconforming use in nonresidential zone to expand outside of original lot Use of the property (Current regulations) boundaries 7 D. A nonconforming use in residential zones may be expanded only within the boundaries of the original lot and any adjacent lot having the same ownership as the lot at the time the use on the original lot became • -- • arming, if: 1 . The expanded use does nof'degru - - - - - - '- - - - • -a er t an the original use; 2. The expanded use does not adversely impact the use of neighboring property; 3. Any transfer of ownership on adjacent lots was made concurrently with the transfer of ownership of the lot on which the nonconforming use is located as part of a single transaction; and 4. The expansion does not create additional develo•ment o• •ortunities on adjacent lots that would not otherwise exist. E. A - - conforming use in a nonresidential zoning district may be expanded only within the boundari- - e original lot and any lot adjacent to the original lot, if: 1 . The original lot and the "expansion" lot are in the same zoning district; 2. The expanded use does not degrade the transportation level of service greater than the original use; and 3. anded use does not adversely impact the use of neighboring property. Example of NonconformingUse Expansion — adjacentproperties 8 Original Expanded . Nonconforming , a Nonconforming Use I . Use 2 parcels) At G Area (3 parcels) �A' lf , ..,.. . .. a ti cry ^ 1 , , _ ,it ..1 . :0:ie.__ --..... . . N A Y ,' ,.i } j .,, • '1.: ;,‘3''..,.. '"„-4:-'- . ,4'1°fr, ‘'-'„. ,_' t V� a gzsae xv "l S _.......--- L-- - \ N. • • -,..4'' . , �,,,„- 2008 Aerials ` �.,„," 2018 Aerials Cla �: \ .• . -a j 1-1Parcels 10 I I Parr. ! e Chapter 1 9.25 Continuing Lawful Staff Solution: Allow nonconforming use to expand only within the original lot Use of the property (Staff proposed regulatioi boundaries 9 D. A nonconforming use in residential zoncs may be expanded only within the boundaries of the original lot nonconforming, if: 1 . The expanded use does not degrade the transportation level of service greater than the original use; 2. The expanded use does not adversely impact the use of neighboring property; 3. Any transfer of ownership on adjacent lots was made concurrently with the transfer of ownership of the lot on which the nonconforming use is located as part of a single transaction; and 4. The expansion does not crest- . . .' '- - - eleveierffleig4 - _ - - - - • • •'acent lots that would not otherwise exi onconforming use in a nonresidential zoning district may be expanded only within the boundaries o same zoning district; . - - - - - - _ _ - _ _ - _ _ - - - - - - _ - _ _ - _ - _ _ - Planning Commission Solution: Chapter 1 9.25 Continuing Lawful Use Allow a nonconforming use to expand only within the original of the property (Planning Commission Recommendation) lot boundaries and adjacent •ro •erties with same ownershi• 10 D. A nonconforming use in rcsidcntial zoncs may be expanded only within the boundaries of the original lot and any adjacent lot having the same ownership as the lot at the time the use on the original lot became • • (conforming, if: 1 . The expande• use • •- - - - _ - - - - - - • - - - •- • - - - - •-- - - •n e original use; 2. The expanded use does not adversely impact the use of neighboring property; 3. Any transfer of ownership on adjacent lots was made concurrently with the transfer of ownership of the lot on which the nonconforming use is located as part of a single transaction; and 4. The expansion does not create additional development opportunities on adjacent lots that would not otherwise exist. E. A nonconforming use in a nonrcsidcntial zoning district may be cxpandcd only within the boundaries of the samc zoning district; What does AdjacentMean? ❑ SVMC does not define "Adjacent" ❑ . I . • • . B.5 B - . • . - or • • 1 • 1 t • shall include corner touches and property located • - a • ublic y� pro pert right-of-way) to of • - J same or higher zoning classification; The only substantive reference to the term "adjacent" lies in Chapter 19.30 SVMC Discussion 12 ❑ Consensus to move the CTA forward to Ordinance 1St Reading: o Staffs proposal; Q Planning Commission's recommendation; G Council's modification to Code language; or c Take other action deemed appropriate FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE SPOKANE VALLEY PLANNING COMMISSION CTA-2020-0003 Proposed Amendment to Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) Pursuant to SVMC 17.80.150(E) the Planning Commission shall consider the proposal and shall prepare and forward a recommendation to the City Council following the public hearing. The following findings are consistent with the Planning Commission recommendation. Background: 1. Pursuant to RCW 36.70A.130, Spokane Valley adopted its 2016 Comprehensive Plan Update and updated development regulations on December 13,2016,with December 28,2016 as the effective date. 2. CTA-2020-0003 is a City-initiated text amendment to the SVMC, amending chapter 19.25 of the SVMC to prohibit the expansion of a nonconforming use onto adjacent lots and determine residential uses located in nonresidential zones are permitted uses,and to address other housekeeping items. 3. The Planning Commission held a properly noticed public hearing and conducted deliberations on August 13, 2020. The Commissioners voted 6-0 to recommend that the City Council adopt the amendment. Planning Commission Findings: 1. Compliance with SVMC 17.80.150(F) Approval Criteria a. The proposed text amendment is consistent with the applicable provisions of the Comprehensive Plan. Findings:The proposed amendment is supported by the Comprehensive Plan and is consistent with the following goals and policies: LU-G1 Maintain and enhance the character and quality of life in Spokane Valley. LU-P5 Ensure compatibility between adjacent residential and commercial or industrial uses LU-P7 Protect residential neighborhoods from incompatible land uses and adverse impacts associated with transportation corridors. ED-G3 Balance economic development with community development priorities and fiscal sustainability. T-G2 Ensure that transportation planning efforts reflect anticipated land use patterns and support identified growth opportunities. T-P2 Consider neighborhood traffic and livability conditions and address potential adverse impacts of public and private projects during the planning,designing,permitting, and construction phases. Conclusion: The proposed text amendment is supported by the Comprehensive Plan and consistent with the goals and policies. Findings and Recommendations of the Spokane Valley Planning Commission CTA-2020-0003 Page 1 of 2 b. The proposed amendment bears a substantial relation to public health, safety,welfare and protection of the environment. Findings: The proposed amendment bears substantial relation to public health, safety, welfare and protection of the environment. Allowing nonconforming uses to operate and expand onsite protects the interests of the current property owners and the investments made; allowing nonconforming uses to expand to an adjacent lot having the same ownership as the lot at the time the use on the original lot became nonconforming protects the long term interests of those property owners and promotes business retention;restricting the expansion of nonconforming uses outside of those properties commonly held at the time the use became nonconforming ensures that future growth is consistent with the comprehensive plan and protects the interest of the surrounding properties. The proposed amendment recognizes that nonconforming residential uses may be the best use of the property until the market supports the redevelopment of the property to either a commercial or industrial use and establishes a stable framework for the residential property owner to address the concerns of financial lenders. Conclusion: The proposed text amendment is consistent with Comprehensive Plan and bears a substantial relation to public health, safety,welfare, and protection of the environment. 2. Recommendation: The Spokane Valley Planning Commission therefore recommends the City Council approve CTA-2020- 0003 as amended. Attachment: Exhibit 1—Proposed Amendment CTA-2020-0003 Approved this 27th day of August,2020 Planning Commission Chairman ATTEST Marianne Lemons,Office Assistant Findings and Recommendations of the Spokane Valley Planning Commission CTA-2020-0003 Page 2 of 2 Regular Meeting Minutes Spokane Valley Planning Commission Council Chambers—City Hall July 23rd,2020 I. Chair Johnson called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. The meeting was held remotely via ZOOM meeting. II. Commissioners, staff and audience stood for the pledge of allegiance. III. Administrative Assistant Taylor Dillard took roll and the following members and staff were present: Fred Beaulac, Joined At 6:25 pm Erik Lamb, Deputy City Attorney Walt Haneke Jenny Nickerson, Building Official James Johnson Mike Basinger, Economic Development Manager Danielle Kaschmitter Lori Barlow, Senior Planner Tim Kelley Chaz Bates, Senior Planner Bob McKinley Taylor Dillard, Administrative Assistant Sherri Robinson Marianne Lemons, Office Assistant There was a consensus from the Planning Commission to excuse Commissioner Beaulac from the meeting. IV. AGENDA: Commissioner Kaschmitter moved to approve the July 23, 2020 agenda as presented. There was no discussion. The vote on the motion was six in favor, zero against and the motion passed. V. MINUTES: Commissioner Kaschmitter moved to approve the amended June 11, 2020 minutes as presented. There was no discussion. The vote on the motion was six in favor, zero against and the motion passed. Commissioner Kaschmitter moved to approve the July 9, 2020 minutes as presented. There was no discussion. The vote on the motion was six in favor, zero against and the motion passed. VI. COMMISSION REPORTS: Chairman Johnson reported that he has continued to attend the Spokane County Human Rights Task Force meetings. There were no other reports. VII. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT: Building Official Jenny Nickerson reminded the commissioners to drop off their yellow binders to City Hall so they can be used for the City Council packets. Ms. Nickerson also requested that the letter from applicant Jay Rambo regarding CPA-2020-0003 and the agency comments included for CTA-2020-0003 be removed from the Planning Commission Packet. They were included in error. VIII. PUBLIC COMMENT: There was no public comment. 1 07-23-2020 Planning Commission Minutes Page 2 of 4 IX. COMMISSION BUSINESS: a. Findings of Fact: 2020 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendments Senior Planner Chaz Bates gave a presentation to the commission. He explained that there were two study sessions held on March 6, 2020 and June 11, 2020 regarding these amendments. The public hearing was held on June 25, 2020 and the Planning Commission deliberated on each amendment individually and came up with recommendations to be submitted to the City Council. The Planning Commission voted to recommend approval of CPA-2020-0001, CPA-2020-0002, and CPA-2020-0006. The Planning Commission voted to recommend denial of CPA-2020-0003 and CPA-2020-0007. This item is being heard to formalize those findings and the Planning Commission vote on each amendment. Commissioner Kaschmitter moved to approve and forward to City Council the findings and recommendation of the Planning Commission for the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendments CPA-2020-0001, CPA-2020-0002, CPA-2020-0003, CPA-2020-0006, and CPA-2020-0007. There was no discussion. The vote on the motion was six in favor, zero against and the motion passed. b. Findings Of Fact: CTA-2020-0001,A proposed amendment to Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) 19.180 Annexations Economic Development Manager Mike Basinger explained that the proposed amendment to the SVMC is to clarify the process and criteria to annex areas which are adjacent and contiguous to the City. It also ensures that the fiscal impacts of providing the facilities, utilities, services, and maintenance of the annexation areas are adequately considered prior to annexation. The process included a study session on June 11, 2020 and a public hearing on July 9, 2020. During the public hearing, the Planning Commission voted to recommend approval of the proposed change. This item is being heard to formalize those findings and the Planning Commission vote. Commissioner Kaschmitter moved to approve and forward to City Council the findings and recommendation of the Planning Commission for the proposed amendment CTA-2020-0001. There was no discussion. The vote on the motion was six in favor, zero against and the motion passed. c. Findings Of Fact: CTA-2020-0002, A proposed amendment to SVMC 19.90 Essential Public Facilities Senior Planner Lori Barlow stated that this proposed amendment is to prohibit locally significant Essential Public Facilities (EPF) in residential zones and allow EPF's in the Mixed-Use zone. The process included a study session on June 11, 2020 and a public hearing on July 9, 2020. The Planning Commission voted to recommend approval of the proposed change. This item is being heard to formalize those findings and the Planning Commission vote. Commissioner Kaschmitter moved to approve and forward the City Council the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission for proposed amendment CTA-2020-0002. 2 07-23-2020 Planning Commission Minutes Page 3 of 4 There was no discussion. The vote on the motion was six in favor, zero against and the motion passed. d. Study Session: CTA-2020-0003,Nonconforming Use Code Text Amendment Senior Planner Lori Barlow gave the Commission a presentation explaining that Chapter 19.25 of the SVMC regulates nonconforming uses and structures and defines what is considered a legal nonconforming use or structure. According to the municipal code, nonconforming uses are uses or structures that were legally permitted under the applicable regulations at the time the use or structure came into existence and began lawful operations but subsequent changes or amendments to the zoning regulations occurred and made the use or structure nonconforming. Under this section of the municipal code, these nonconforming uses are allowed to continue and are subject to regulations of this chapter. The chapter also outlines the circumstances that a nonconforming use can be expanded. There are two reasons that the City has been prompted to look at this item. The first reason is regarding single family residential uses in a non-residential zoning district. In the applicability section of SVMC 19.25.010(4) states that existing legally established single- family residential uses located in a nonresidential zoning district are defined as a legal nonconforming use or structure. According to SVMC 19.25.030(E), if a structure is damaged by fire,flood, neglect, or act of nature more than eighty percent of the market value,it may not be rebuilt. This notation in the municipal code is causing problems for residents to get financing to either refinance a current mortgage or get a new mortgage. Banks want to make sure that they can retain their value in the event of a disaster. Staff is proposing to make a change to item four of the applicability regulation that states "existing legally established single-family residential uses located in a nonresidential zoning district shall not be deemed nonconforming and shall be permitted as a legal use." Commissioner Beaulac joined the meeting at 6:25 pm. Ms. Barlow continued that the second reason that has prompted the code text amendment is regarding the ability for property owners to expand nonconforming uses. The current regulations state that nonconforming uses can be expanded within the boundaries of the original lot and any lot adjacent to the original lot if they meet all criteria laid out in the code. Staff is proposing to remove the language from the code allowing expansion onto adjacent lots. Nonconforming uses will continue to be allowed to expand only within the confines of the boundaries of the original lot. Commissioner Haneke asked if a nonconforming use is only allowed to expand one time onto an adjacent lot. Ms. Barlow answered that staff interpretation would be that owners are limited to expand only one time onto an adjacent lot. However, this isn't a situation that has come up for review yet. The proposed amendment would limit expansions to only occur on the confines of the original lot and would prohibit expansion onto any adjacent locations. Commissioners Haneke and McKinley expressed concern over the change because it would limit businesses from growing. It's substantially less expensive to expand than relocate and relocation could be outside of the City limits. Commissioner Haneke asked how many nonconforming residential units there are within the City limits. Ms. Barlow stated that she will try to get that data from the GIS analyst for the next meeting. 3 07-23-2020 Planning Commission Minutes Page 4 of 4 Deputy City Attorney Erik Lamb mentioned that this will also apply to all mining operations. Currently in the code, all mining within the City limits is considered a nonconforming use because mining really isn't appropriate within an urban setting. However, under the current regulations mining can be expanded onto adjacent properties if the owners purchase the land. This change will eliminate that ability. X. GOOD OF THE ORDER: Commissioner Beaulac apologized for being late to the meeting. Commissioner Haneke and Commissioner Kaschmitter thanked staff for their hard work. XI. ADJOURNMENT: Commissioner McKinley moved to adjourn the meeting at 6:54 pm. The vote on the motion was seven in favor, zero against, and the motion passed. James Johnson, Chair Date signed Deanna Horton, Secretary 4 Regular Meeting Minutes Spokane Valley Planning Commission Council Chambers —City Hall August 13,2020 I. Chair Johnson called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. The meeting was held remotely via ZOOM meeting. II. Commissioners, staff and audience stood for the pledge of allegiance. III. Administrative Assistant Taylor Dillard took roll and the following members and staff were present: Fred Beaulac Erik Lamb, Deputy City Attorney Walt Haneke Jenny Nickerson, Building Official James Johnson Lori Barlow, Senior Planner Danielle Kaschmitter, absent Connor Lange,Planner Tim Kelley Taylor Dillard, Administrative Assistant Bob McKinley Marianne Lemons, Office Assistant Sherri Robinson There was a consensus from the Planning Commission to excuse Commissioner Kaschmitter from the meeting. IV. AGENDA: Commissioner Beaulac moved to approve the August 13, 2020 agenda as presented. There was no discussion. The vote on the motion was six in favor, zero against and the motion passed. V. MINUTES: Commissioner McKinley moved to approve the amended July 23, 2020 minutes as presented with one change to page 3 paragraph 7 sentence 2 to read: "It's substantially less expensive to expand than relocate and relocation could be outside of the City limits." There was no discussion. The vote on the motion was six in favor, zero against and the motion passed. VI. COMMISSION REPORTS: Chair Johnson reported that he continues to attend the Human Rights Task Force meetings. He also informed the Planning Commission that he attended the City Council meeting on August 4, 2020 and they came to a consensus to approve all of the Comprehensive Plan amendments that were submitted. VII. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT: There was no administrative report. VIII. PUBLIC COMMENT: There was no public comment. IX. COMMISSION BUSINESS: 1 08-13-2020 Planning Commission Minutes Page 2 of 5 a. Public Hearing: CTA-2020-0003, Proposed amendment to Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) Chapter 19.25,Nonconforming Uses and Structures The Public Hearing was opened at 6:09 pm. Senior Planner Lori Barlow gave the Commission a presentation explaining that Chapter 19.25 of the SVMC regulates nonconforming uses and structures and defines what is considered a legal nonconforming use or structure. According to the municipal code,nonconforming uses are uses or structures that were legally permitted under the applicable regulations at the time the use or structure came into existence and began lawful operations but subsequent changes or amendments to the zoning regulations occurred and made the use or structure nonconforming. Under this section of the municipal code, these nonconforming uses are allowed to continue and are subject to regulations of this chapter. The chapter also outlines the circumstances that a nonconforming use can be expanded. This item was presented to the Commission as an administrative report on July 23, 2020 and proper noticing has been done for the public hearing. An environmental review has been conducted and it concluded that there would be no environmental impacts if this code text amendment were approved. Ms. Barlow explained that there are two reasons that the City has been prompted to look at this item. The first reason is regarding single family residential structures in a non- residential zoning district. The applicability section of SVMC 19.25.010(4) states that existing legally established single-family residential structures located in a nonresidential zoning district are defined as a legal nonconforming use or structure. According to SVMC 19.25.030(E), "if a structure is damaged by fire,flood, neglect, or act of nature more than eighty percent of the market value, it may not be rebuilt. " This notation in the municipal code causes problems for residents to get financing to either refinance a current mortgage or get a new mortgage. Banks want to make sure that they can retain their value in the event of a disaster. Staff is proposing to make a change to item four of the applicability regulation that states "existing legally established single-family residential structures located in a nonresidential zoning district shall not be deemed nonconforming and shall be permitted as a legal use." This change to the language removes these homes from being reviewed and regulated under the nonconforming use regulations. Ms. Barlow noted that there is a change in this language from the last meeting. Previously, the language read single-family residential "uses". That language has been updated to single-family residential "structures"to prevent additional nonconformities within zoning districts. A damaged single-family home cannot be replaced with a multifamily dwelling and cannot be subdivided for residential purposes. According to the City's GIS Depailiuent, there are approximately 190 single-family residential structures identified that will be affected by this change. Ms. Barlow continued that the second item that has prompted this code text amendment is regarding the ability for property owners to expand nonconforming uses. The current regulations state that nonconforming uses can be expanded within the boundaries of the original lot and any lot adjacent to the original lot if they meet all criteria laid out in the municipal code. Staff is proposing to remove the language from the municipal code allowing expansion onto adjacent lots. Nonconforming uses will continue to be allowed to expand within the confines of the boundaries of the original lot only. Commissioner Haneke asked if a property owner owns a lot adjacent to a nonconforming use prior to it being deemed nonconforming,would this change stop the business from being allowed to expand onto the second lot. Ms. Barlow answered that this change would prohibit 2 08-13-2020 Planning Commission Minutes Page 3 of 5 that expansion. Commissioner Haneke expressed that he would like the municipal code to allow expansion on adjacent properties that were owned by the same property owner prior to the nonconforming designation. Ms. Barlow explained that currently the municipal code defines the ability to expand into two categories: nonconforming uses in residential zones and nonconforming uses in non- residential zones. The existing language regarding residential zones states that property owners can expand to an adjacent lot if both lots were owned prior to the nonconforming designation. The language pertaining to nonresidential zones states that expansion could happen on an adjacent lot subject to specific criteria. The proposal is to eliminate the expansion criteria onto adjacent lots and limit expansion to the confines of the existing lot regardless of whether the property is residential or nonresidential. The public hearing was closed at 6:48 PM Commissioner McKinley expressed concern that this change could cause businesses to leave the City limits if they are unable to expand in their current location and need additional space. He feels that businesses should be allowed to expand rather than forcing them to relocate. Commissioner Kelley expressed that he feels that residential and nonresidential should be treated equally within the code. Ms. Barlow responded that residential and nonresidential are reviewed differently. The proposed change to residential would allow legal nonconforming single-family residences to continue and expand under the regulations. Businesses would need to comply and expansion would only be allowed within the confines of their existing lot or they would have to relocate their business to a location that is zoned properly for their business use. The logic for this difference is based on the market dictating when those residential uses will become more valuable as commercial or industrial. A pocket of residences isn't going to change until the market creates an opportunity where there is a significant value in making adjustment to the property. Staff wants to make sure that the municipal code does not create a burden on the single-family home property owners causing them to be unable to refinance or sell their property. There was consensus from the Commission regarding approval of the change to the residential portion of the municipal code that protects homeowners of legal nonconforming structures. Chairman Johnson clarified that the primary concern of the Commission is that this change will limit a property owner that owns an adjacent property to a nonconforming use to utilize that property as expansion for the nonconforming business. He asked if there should be a time limitation on their ability to expand onto that property. Commissioner Haneke responded that he feels the property owners should be allowed to maintain the expansion ability for as long as they own the property (if the property was purchased prior to the nonconforming designation). However, if the property is sold it would lose that possibility. He would like to see this change apply to both residential and nonresidential. There was lengthy discussion regarding how to make these changes to the code text. Deputy City Attorney Erik Lamb presented an updated draft code based on the conversation updating Chapter 19.25.020(D)to state the following: 3 08-13-2020 Planning Commission Minutes Page 4 of 5 D. A nonconforming use in residential zones may be expanded only within the boundaries of the original lot and any adjacent lot having the same ownership as the lot at the time the use on the original lot became conforming, if: 1. The expanded use does not degrade the transportation level of service greater than the original use; 2. The expanded use does not adversely impact the use of neighboring property; 3. Any transfer of ownership on adjacent lots was made concurrently with the transfer of ownership of the lot on which the nonconforming use is locates as part of a single transaction;and 4. The expansion does not create additional development opportunities on adjacent lots that would not otherwise exist; and 5. The use is not a single-family residential use. Section 19.25.020(E)will be removed from the code in its entirety. The Commission came to a consensus regarding these changes. Chairman Johnson moved to recommend approval of CTA-2020-0003 including the changes to Section 19.25.010(4) regarding single-family residential structures, the addition of line item five in Chapter 19.25.020(D) and removing Chapter 19.25.020(E). There was no discussion. The vote on the motion was six in favor, zero against and the motion passed. Chairman Johnson moved to take a ten-minute break. The vote on the motion was six in favor, zero against and the motion passed. b. Study Session: STV-2020-0001, A proposed street vacation of a portion of Desmet Court between Indiana and Flora Planner Connor Lange gave the Commission a presentation regarding STV-2020-0001, a privately initiated street vacation for a portion of Desmet Court. He explained that the City received the application on May 28, 2020 from Hanson Industries requesting to vacate 220 feet of Desmet Court. The proposed vacation in located between Indiana Avenue (west), Flora Road (east), I-90 (north) and adjacent to three parcels. The total area to be vacated is approximately 12,847 square feet. The proposed vacation will reduce the length of Desmet Court by 220 feet and dedicate a new cul-de-sac to serve the public. The reduced length of Desmet Court will reduce City maintenance costs of snow removal and repaving. The vacation will allow maximum use of abutting properties because parcels 45131.0507, 45131.0509 and 45131.0510 owned by Hanson Industries,which accounts for the majority of ownership along Desmet Court. Commissioner Beaulac asked about comments received from the utility companies. Mr. Lange answered that there are utilities located in the border easement and rights-of-way. The applicant is aware they will have to pay to have all of these relocated to the new cul-de-sac. This will be a condition of approval for the street vacation. Commissioner Haneke expressed that his company is working on the construction on Desmet and he has been involved in discussions regarding possible future development. He asked if he needed to recuse himself from discussion on this matter. Chairman Johnson answered that he should recuse himself if he feels that his involvement in the project would cause him not to consider this matter equably and fairly. Commissioner Haneke responded that he feels he 4 08-13-2020 Planning Commission Minutes Page 5 of 5 can consider this matter fairly and equably but he did want to make sure that the Commission was aware of the possible conflict. X. GOOD OF THE ORDER: Commissioner Beaulac stated that he works for the US Census Bureau and encouraged everyone to send in their census reports and to be helpful to any of the Census agents. Commissioner Robinson thanked the staff and the Commission for all their work on these matters. XI. ADJOURNMENT: Commissioner Kelley moved to adjourn the meeting at 8:12 p. m. The vote on the motion was six in favor, zero against, and the motion passed. James Johnson, Chair Date signed Deanna Horton, Secretary 5 Regular Meeting Minutes Spokane Valley Planning Commission Council Chambers —City Hall August 27,2020 I. Chair Johnson called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. The meeting was held remotely via ZOOM meeting. II. Commissioners, staff and audience stood for the pledge of allegiance. III. Administrative Assistant Taylor Dillard took roll and the following members and staff were present: Fred Beaulac Erik Lamb, Deputy City Attorney Walt Haneke Jenny Nickerson, Building Official James Johnson Lori Barlow, Senior Planner Danielle Kaschmitter, absent Connor Lange,Planner Tim Kelley Taylor Dillard, Administrative Assistant Bob McKinley Marianne Lemons, Office Assistant Sherri Robinson There was a consensus from the Planning Commission to excuse Commissioner Kaschmitter from the meeting. IV. AGENDA: Commissioner Robinson moved to approve the August 27, 2020 agenda as presented. There was no discussion. The vote on the motion was six in favor, zero against and the motion passed. V. MINUTES: Commissioner Beaulac moved to approve the August 13, 2020 minutes as presented. There was no discussion. The vote on the motion was six in favor, zero against and the motion passed. VI. COMMISSION REPORTS: Chair Johnson reported that he continues to attend the Human Rights Task Force meetings. VII. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT: Building Official Jenny Nickerson stated that the Council Chamber windows of City Hall will be lit up with purple and gold lights to commemorate the 100th anniversary of"Women's Right To Vote." VIII. PUBLIC COMMENT: There was no public comment. IX. COMMISSION BUSINESS: 1 08-27-2020 Planning Commission Minutes Page 2 of 4 a. Findings Of Fact: CTA-2020-0003,Proposed Amendment To Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) Chapter 19.25,Nonconforming Uses and Structures Senior Planner Lori Barlow requested approval of the findings of fact from the meeting held on August 13, 2020 regarding the proposed amendment to the SVMC regarding nonconforming uses and structures. This document will formalize the Planning Commission's actions and the recommendation will be submitted to the City Council for approval. Chairman Johnson moved to approve the Findings of Fact as presented. There was no discussion. The vote on the motion was six in favor, zero against and the motion passed. b. Public Hearing: STV-2020-0001, A proposed street vacation of a portion of Desmet Court between Indiana and Flora Commissioner Haneke recused himself from this due to a conflict of interest as his company is involved in the project. He was placed in the Zoom waiting room for the duration of the agenda item. The public hearing was opened at 6:11 p.m. Planner Connor Lange gave the Commission a presentation regarding STV-2020-0001, a privately initiated street vacation for a portion of Desmet Court. He explained that the City received the application on May 28, 2020 from Hanson Industries requesting to vacate 220 feet of Desmet Court. A study session was held on this request on August 13, 2020. The proposed vacation is located between Indiana Avenue (west), Flora Road(east), I-90 (north) and adjacent to three parcels. The total area to be vacated is approximately 12,847 square feet. The proposed vacation will reduce the length of Desmet Court by 210 feet and dedicate a new cul-de-sac to serve the public. The reduced length of Desmet Court will reduce City maintenance costs of snow removal and repaving. The vacation proposal will not impact circulation of City streets because there is no right-of-way available for a future connection to Flora Road to the east. The vacation will allow maximum use of abutting properties because parcels 45131.0507, 45131.0509 and 45131.0510 are all owned by Hanson Industries. The public hearing meets all of the notification requirements: posted in three places,published in the Valley Herald twice, written notice sent out to abutting property owners immediately along Desmet Court and signs posted at each end of the proposed vacation area. The request meets all of the SVMC criteria of approval for a street vacation. The site contains utility improvements (cable, internet, sewer, gas, and power). The utility companies all provided comments addressing the existence of these utilities and requesting they be relocated to the new cul-de-sac at the time of dedication. Staff has informed the applicants that this work will have to be done at their expense. Planner Connor expressed that staff recommends approval of this request subject to conditions 1-11 outlined in pages five and six of the staff report. Chairman Johnson asked about compensation from the developers. Planner Lange responded that there has not been any conversation about compensation but staff's determination would be not to request such since the developers are required to dedicate a new cul-de-sac. Chair Johnson asked if anyone from the public wished to testify. 2 08-27-2020 Planning Commission Minutes Page 3 of 4 Todd Whipple, Whipple Consulting Engineers: Mr. Whipple commented that the property is going to be purchased by Lance Douglass who owns the apartment project under construction to the north of the property. He plans to build additional apartments on these parcels. Mr. Whipple also mentioned that all of this basin drains into the large pond on the property. During discussions with Chad Riggs in Development Engineering, it was determined that the size of the pond could be reduced based on new standards that are in place. He requested that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the street vacation to City Council. Commissioner Robinson asked for clarification regarding reducing the pond size. Mr. Whipple responded that when this project was originally created,the guidelines for stormwater management required ponds to be 40%bigger than they needed to be. Those guidelines have now been adjusted and the changes allow for more developed land area. The public hearing was closed at 6:28 p.m. Chairman Johnson moved to recommend approval of the proposed street vacation for Desmet Court to the City Council subject to staff conditions. There was no discussion. The vote on the motion was five in favor, zero against and the motion passed. Commissioner Haneke rejoined the meeting. C. Study Session: CTA-2019-0005, A proposed amendment to Title 20, Subdivisions Planner Connor Lange gave a staff presentation. He explained that the Revised Code of Washington (RCW) 58.17 provides the state requirements for subdivisions and Title 20 of the SVMC provides the local standards for processing subdivisions. Local jurisdictions can incorporate their own additional processes regarding short subdivisions (9 or fewer lots)but state law outlines the regulations regarding long subdivisions (10 or more lots). Changes have been made to the RCW in recent years and the City needs to update their code to reflect those changes and requirements. Planner Lange outlined the current processes for short/long subdivisions and preliminary/final plat alternations. He also explained scenarios an applicant might need to do a plat alteration. Commissioner Haneke asked about the regulations regarding bonding of projects. Planner Lange answered that the City doesn't generally enter into performance bonds for completion of a project. The City requires all improvements to be completed prior to recording of final plats. But the City does utilize warranty bonds for projects that have been completed and are in the warranty stage. Deputy City Attorney Lamb clarified that the City's street standards outline when a performance bond can be used. Planner Lange explained general design requirements and criteria staff uses when analyzing proposed plats that are submitted. This includes the design, shape, size, and orientation of the lots, lot arrangement, block dimensions, access, adequate public domestic water supply, stormwater run-off and utility easements. He explained that a formal study session will be held at the next Planning Commission meeting that will outline all proposed code text language. 3 08-27-2020 Planning Commission Minutes Page 4 of 4 X. GOOD OF THE ORDER: Commissioner McKinley, Beaulac, and Robinson all thanked the staff for a well-done presentation. Commissioner Kelley expressed frustration with the lack of adherence to Robert's Rules of Order during previous Planning Commission meetings. XI. ADJOURNMENT: Commissioner Haneke moved to adjourn the meeting at 7:15 p.m. The vote on the motion was six in favor, zero against, and the motion passed. James Johnson, Chair Date signed Deanna Horton, Secretary 4 COMMUNITY AND PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING&PLANNING Spokane STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO THE 4,000'Valley PLANNING COMMISSION CTA-2020-0003 STAFF REPORT DATE: August 4,2020 HEARING DATE AND LOCATION: August 13, beginning at 6:00 p.m.; Due to the restrictions on public gatherings arising from the covid-19 outbreak,and pursuant to Governor Inslee's Stay Home,Stay Healthy Proclamation (No. 20-25) and Proclamation 20-28 (and associated extensions), this hearing will be conducted remotely using web and telephone conference tools. A link to the Zoom meeting will be provided on the agenda and posted to the City's webpage: www.spokanevalley.org/planningcommission. Proposal Description: A city-initiated code text amendment (CTA) to chapter 19.25 of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) to prohibit the expansion of a nonconforming use onto adjacent lots, determine residential uses located in nonresidential zones are permitted uses, and other housekeeping items. APPROVAL CRITERIA: Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan, SVMC 17.80.150, 19.30.040. SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS: Staff concludes that the proposed amendments to chapter 19.25 SVMC is consistent with the minimum criteria for review and approval,and consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. STAFF CONTACT:Lori Barlow,AICP, Senior Planner. REVIEWED BY: Jenny Nickerson,Building Official. ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit 1: Proposed Amendment APPLICATION PROCESSING: Chapter 17.80 SVMC,Permit Processing Procedures. The following table summarizes the procedural steps for the proposal. Process Date Department of Commerce 60-day Notice of Intent to July 21,2020 Adopt Amendment SEPA—DNS Issued July 24,2020 Published Notice of Public Hearing: July 24 and 31,2020 Background: Chapter 19.25 SVMC regulates nonconforming uses and structures. Appendix A Definitions of the SVMC defines a nonconforming use as,"A lot,use,building,or structure,which was legal when commenced or built, but which does not conform to subsequently enacted or amended regulations pursuant to Chapter 19.25 SVMC." Chapter 19.25 SVMC defines what is considered a legal nonconforming use or structure, then provides conditions for how a legal nonconforming use may continue and be expanded. Generally, if a use or structure was legally Staff Report and Recommendation CTA-2020-0003 permitted under the applicable regulations at the time the use or structure came into existence and began lawful operations,the use or structure is considered a legal nonconforming use if the current regulations and amendments to regulations otherwise prohibit such use. See SVMC 19.25.010. Legal nonconforming uses are allowed to continue as is until the use is discontinued or abandoned for a period of 12 consecutive months. See SVMC 19.25.020. The City's nonconforming use regulations were adopted in 2007 by Ordinance No. 07-015 and modified by Ordinance Nos. 09-036, 10-016, and 10-023. Ordinance No. 16-018 repealed the development regulations as part of the 2016 Legislative Update and adopted updated titles,which included chapter 19.25 SVMC,although no substantial substantive changes were made at that time. The chapter was further modified by Ord. 17-004 with housekeeping items. The primary amendments occurred in Ordinance No. 10-016 in 2010, by allowing nonconforming uses to expand onto properties outside of the original boundaries of the use if certain criteria were met. However, allowing nonconforming uses to expand circumvents the intent of the comprehensive plan and zoning as the use becomes more invested at that location, rather than discontinuing the use, and moving to an appropriately zoned location. CTA 2020-0003 proposes to remove the criteria which allows for expansion outside of the original property boundaries,but allow expansion on site, subject to criteria. The language proposed rolls back the criteria and returns the development regulations to that language previously implemented prior to Ordinance No. 10-016. During the 2016 Legislative Update, minor changes were made in chapter 19.25 SVMC that provided that a residential use in a nonresidential zone was a legal nonconforming use. Previously, the language provided that residential uses in nonresidential zones "shall not be deemed nonconforming and shall be permitted as a legal use." The implication of the change to those residential uses is that if they are damaged by fire, flood, or neglect, and the damage represents more than 80% of market value of the structure, they may not be rebuilt. This has created a financing issue for affected single family homes. The language proposed returns the language to the previous verbiage and identifies the residential use as a permitted use not subject to the nonconforming use regulations. ANALYSIS: Currently legal nonconforming uses are allowed to continue indefinitely so long as operations are not abandoned or discontinued for more than 12 months,may be replaced with a conforming use or another nonconforming use and expanded onto adjacent lots,if certain criteria are met subject to the criteria in SVMC 19.25.020. Additionally,legally established single-family residential uses located in a nonresidential zone are subject to the regulations of chapter 19.25 SVMC. The proposed amendment: 1. Prohibits the expansion of a legal nonconforming use onto adjacent properties to protect the interests of property owners within the immediate area consistent with the zoning district. As noted above legal nonconforming uses are allowed to continue,be replaced by another nonconforming use, and even expand onto adjacent lots if several criteria are met. The purpose of nonconforming use regulations is generally to create a regulatory framework to allow a nonconforming use to continue operations with the intention that at some point the use will transition to a conforming use after the nonconforming use ceases. The Comprehensive Plan land use designation is the guide for future development, and over time it anticipates that the use will conform to the Plan. However,because the regulations allow for expansion on site,on adjacent lots, and the ability of a nonconforming use to transition to a different nonconforming use,it has been found that the nonconforming uses are not transitioning to appropriate zones,but growing and changing operations in those locations. The byproduct of these regulations has been continued investment in the sites,making it less likely that the use will transition to a conforming Page 2 of 5 Staff Report and Recommendation CTA-2020-0003 use consistent with the comprehensive plan, and encroachment of an incompatible use into adjacent areas. The City can cite two examples. The first example is the Hite Crane example. The previous use of the Hite Crane properties appears to have been a fence company with a contractors yard for product,vehicle and equipment storage. The business was operating on two parcels in an area zoned Corridor Mixed Use (CMU). Surrounding land uses included the Greenacres Middle School,single family uses and an older manufactured home park. CMU allows a range of commercial,limited light industrial uses,and residential uses.The fence company was nonconforming. The Hite Crane business purchased the two lots of the former fence company after it was determined to meet the criteria that would allow a different nonconforming use to begin operations, and then allowed to expand operations to the adjacent lot following the purchase. Pursuant to SVMC 19.20.015(F)the CMU allows for light manufacturing,retail, multifamily,and offices along major transportation corridors and provides that adjacent residential zones are protected through transitional standards.Although the CMU zoning district requires transitional regulations to offset the impacts of higher intensity uses on less intensive uses,they attempt to use setbacks and vegetation to create a buffer between the uses and preserve privacy. The standards cannot fully mitigate the impacts of fumes and noises from trucks and equipment,or noise from employees or customers and industrial vehicle traffic that affect the reasonable enjoyment of adjacent properties.The investment of the expansion decreases the likelihood that the nonconforming use will transition to a nonconforming use and increases the incompatibility with the existing land uses that are consistent with the intent of the comprehensive plan. The second example involves property located at 11323 S. Dishman Mica Road. In 2014 the property owner requested a Nonconforming Use Determination(ADI-2014-0001)to allow recreational marijuana processing as a nonconforming use to replace the Industrial Supply and Rigging business that previously existed on the site as a nonconforming use. The decision determined that marijuana processing would be allowed to replace the existing nonconforming use at that location with the stipulation that processing would be limited to cutting and bagging marijuana. In 2017 a second determination was requested(ADI-2017-0001)to determine if the nonconforming use rights of the property would include marijuana growing and carbon dioxide processing,in addition to the marijuana processing currently allowed. The request was denied. While the example doesn't speak to an expansion of the use to adjacent properties,it does identify how a nonconforming use is replaced by a new nonconforming use, and how the use continues to grow outside of the intent of the zoning district. At the time the initial determination was made,the carbon dioxide processing was not the typical form of processing. Over time, carbon dioxide processing became a more typical method, and as a result the business owner requested to expand the use. It was determined that several public safety risks were associated with that type of processing, and that the growing operation may also present issues not anticipated by the code. As a result the request was denied,and the nonconforming use was limited by the decision of ADI-2014-0001. The example highlights how original nonconforming properties can evolve into new nonconforming uses,how the changing land use trends are absorbed into the community, and how continued investment in the property continues the likelihood of future nonconforming uses that are inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Based on the current code,the regulations would allow a request to expand to adjacent properties, and if the criteria were met,the request would be approved. Page 3 of 5 Staff Report and Recommendation CTA-2020-0003 2. Determines legal nonconforming single family residential uses in nonresidential zones to be permitted uses and not subject to the chapter 19.25 SVMC Nonconforming use regulations. The amendment recognizes that residential uses exist within the RC,IMU and I zones. The amendment recognizes that until the market determines that the value of those existing residences is great enough to warrant the redevelopment costs of the property that the residential uses will remain. At this point, adequate available land exists to provide for commercial and industrial uses that may not support the redevelopment of the land, and as a result it is anticipated that those nonconforming pockets of residential development will continue as residential. Until the market changes,the regulations create an unnecessary burden on the property owners that affects their ability to sell or refinance the property. The primary issue impacting the property stems from the regulation that restricts the rebuilding of the property if it is damaged to an extent that is greater than 80%of the market value of the property. This creates uncertainty for financial lenders knowing that damages could determine if the use could be rebuilt or continue as residential. It additionally creates a situation where the property could remain vacant subsequent to damages if a residence could not be rebuilt,and the market is not ready to absorb the cost of redeveloping other immediate residential properties in order to aggregate an adequately sized parcel. The purpose of the amendment is to establish a stable regulatory framework allowing nonconforming residential uses to continue until the market supports the redevelopment of the residential property. Between the study session and public hearing, staff identified a minor change to clarify that while such uses are allowed to allow rebuilding damaged homes,further subdivision of the land is not allowed since it further expands and amplifies the nonconformity of the use. A. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO THE MUNICIPAL CODE TEXT AMENDMENT 1. Compliance with Title 17(General Provisions) of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code a. Findings: SVMC 17.80.150(F)Municipal Code Text Amendment Approval Criteria The City may approve a Municipal Code Text amendment if it finds that: i. The proposed text amendment is consistent with the applicable provisions of the Comprehensive Plan: Staff Analysis: The proposed amendment is supported by the Comprehensive Plan and is consistent with the following Comprehensive goals and policies: LU-G1 Maintain and enhance the character and quality of life in Spokane Valley. LU-P5 Ensure compatibility between adjacent residential and commercial or industrial uses LU-P7 Protect residential neighborhoods from incompatible land uses and adverse impacts associated with transportation corridors. ED-G3 Balance economic development with community development priorities and fiscal sustainability. T-G2 Ensure that transportation planning efforts reflect anticipated land use patterns and support identified growth opportunities. Page 4of5 Staff Report and Recommendation CTA-2020-0003 T-P2 Consider neighborhood traffic and livability conditions and address potential adverse impacts of public and private projects during the planning, designing, permitting, and construction phases. ii. The proposed amendment bears a substantial relation to public health, safety, welfare,and protection of the environment: Staff Analysis: The proposed amendment bears substantial relation to public health, safety,welfare and protection of the environment. Allowing nonconforming uses to operate and expand onsite protects the interests of the property owners and the investments made;restricting the expansion to those properties on site ensures that future growth is consistent with the comprehensive plan and protects the interest of the surrounding properties. The proposed amendment recognizes that nonconforming residential uses may be the best use of the property until the market supports the redevelopment of the property to either a commercial or industrial use and establishes a stable framework for the residential property owner to address the concerns of financial lenders. b. Conclusion(s): The proposed text amendment is consistent with the approval criteria contained in the SVMC 17.80.150(F). 2. Finding and Conclusions Specific to Public Comments a. Findings: No public comments have been received to date. b. Conclusion(s): Adequate public noticing was conducted for CTA-2020-0003 pursuant to adopted public noticing procedures. 3. Finding and Conclusions Specific to Agency Comments a. Findings: The City has not received any agency comments to date. b. Conclusion(s): No concerns noted. B. CONCLUSION For the reasons set forth in Section A the proposed code text amendment to prohibit the expansion of legal nonconforming uses onto adjacent properties, determine that legally permitted residential uses located in nonresidential zones are permitted uses, and other housekeeping items is consistent with the requirements of SVMC 17.80.150(F)and the Comprehensive Plan. Page 5 of 5 Eythibit 1 Draft Draft Chapter 19.25 NONCONFORMING USES AND STRUCTURES Sections: 19.25.010 Applicability. 19.25.020 Continuing lawful use of property. 19.25.030 Nonconforming structures. 19.25.040 Completion of permanent structures. 19.25.010 Applicability. A. Legal nonconforming uses and structures include: 1.Any use which does not conform with the present regulations of the zoning district in which it is located that was in existence and in continuous and lawful operation prior to the adoption of SVMC Title 19; 2.Any permanent structure in existence and lawfully constructed at the time of any amendment to SVMC Title 19,which by such amendment is placed in a zoning district wherein it is not otherwise permitted and has since been in regular and continuous use; 3.Any permanent structure lawfully used or constructed that was in existence at the time of annexation into the City and which has since been in regular and continuous use; 4.Existing legally established single-family residential tisesstructures located in a nonresidential zoning district shall not be deemed nonconforming and shall be permitted as a legal usestructure._ B. Structures or uses deemed nonconforming only pursuant to the SMA(Chapter 90.58 RCW)and the City SMP (Chapter 21.50 SVMC,Shoreline Regulations)shall comply with the provisions of SVMC 21.50.160.(Ord. 16-018 § 6(Att.B),2016). 19.25.020 Continuing lawful use of property. A. The lawful use of land at the time of passage of SVMC Title 19,or any amendments hereto,may be continued, unless the use is discontinued or abandoned for a period of 12 consecutive months;except that any nonconforming use discontinued as a result of foreclosure or judicial proceedings,including probate,shall be permitted to continue for a period not to exceed 24 months.The right to continue the nonconforming use shall transfer to all successive interests in the property.Discontinuance of a nonconforming use shall commence on the actual act or date of discontinuance. B.A nonconforming use that is abandoned or discontinued shall not be replaced with another nonconforming use. C. A nonconforming use which has not been abandoned or discontinued may be replaced with a conforming use or another nonconforming use when the use meets the following criteria: 1.The new use is not less conforming than the prior use.This determination shall be made by the city manager or designee; 2.The proposed use does not place a greater demand on transportation and other public facilities than the original use;and 3.The proposed use does not adversely impact the use of neighboring property. D.A nonconforming use in residential zones may be expanded only within the boundaries of the original lot and any adjacent lot having-the same ownership as the lot at the time the use on the original lot became nonconforming,if: 1.The expanded use does not degrade the transportation level of service greater than the original use; 2.The expanded use does not adversely impact the use of neighboring property; CTA-2020-0003 Page 1 July 13, 2020 Draft 3.Any transfer of ownership on adjacent lots was made concurrently with the transfer of ownership of the lot on which the nonconforming use is located as part of a single transaction;and 4.The expansion does not create additional development opportunities on adjacent lots that would not otherwise exist. E.A nonconforming-use in a nonresidential zoning district may be expanded only within the boundaries of the original lot and any lot adjacent to the original lot,if: 1.The original lot and the"expansion"lot are in the same zoning district; 2.The expanded use does not degrade the transportation level of service greater than the original use;and 3.The expanded use does not adversely impact the use of neighboring property. F.Residential lots made nonconforming relative to dimensional requirements shall be deemed conforming if the use is allowed in the respective zoning district. G.Nonconforming uses that do not provide the required number of off-street parking spaces pursuant to current standards shall not be required to meet parking standards. H.Any nonconforming use damaged by fire,flood,neglect,or act of nature may be replaced if: 1.Restoration of the use is initiated within 12 months;and 2.The damage represents less than 80 percent of market value. I.Any nonconforming use changed to a conforming use shall not be permitted to convert to a nonconforming use. (Ord. 17-004§3,2017;Ord. 16-018 § 6(Att.B),2016). 19.25.030 Nonconforming structures. A nonconforming structure may be expanded in accordance with the following: A.The expansion or alteration does not change the occupancy classification under adopted building codes; B.The expansion or alteration does not create additional nonconformity with respect to building setbacks or lot coverage;additions to nonconforming structures shall meet setbacks required within the zoning district; C. The number of dwelling units does not increase so as to exceed the number of dwelling units permitted within current regulations; D.Off-street loading and/or parking,stormwater facilities,and landscaping shall be provided for the alteration or expansion in accordance with Chapter 22.50 SVMC;and E.Nonconforming structures damaged by fire,flood,neglect,or act of nature may be replaced if: 1.Restoration of the structure is initiated within 12 months;and 2.The damage represents less than 80 percent of market value of the structure.(Ord. 16-018 § 6(Att.B), 2016). 19.25.040 Completion of permanent structures. Compliance with Chapter 19.25 SVMC shall not require changes to the plans,construction,or designated use of a structure for which: A.A building permit has been issued or a site plan approved by the City or county prior to incorporation of the City or the effective date of SVMC Title 19;or CTA-2020-0003 Page 2 July 13, 2020 Draft B.A substantially complete application for a building permit was accepted by the building official on or before the effective date of the SVMC Title 19;provided,that the building permit shall comply with all applicable regulations on the date that the application was filed and the building permit is issued within 180 days of the effective date of Chapter 19.25 SVMC.(Ord. 16-018 §6(Att.B),2016). CTA-2020-0003 Page 3 July 13, 2020 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: September 22, 2020 Department Director Approval: El Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ® admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Homeless Shelter Updates GOVERNING LEGISLATION: Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill 6168 PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: • March 12, 2019 - Spokane Housing Authority Update • March 26, 2019 - Presentation on Spokane Valley Homeless Funding • June 4, 2019 - Point-In-Time Count Presentation • August 13, 2019 - Proposed Shelter Discussion • September 3, 2019— Res. 19-013 for SB 1406 Affordable Housing Sales Tax Rebate • October 15, 2019 - Camping in Public Spaces Report • October 29, 2019 - First Reading Regulating Public Camping Ordinance • November 12, 2019 - Adopted Regulating Public Camping Ordinance • February 11, 2020 - Homelessness Update • June 16, 2020 - Regional Bridge Housing Proposal • July 7, 2020 - Commerce Shelter Program Grant Presentation • July 21, 2020 — Commerce Shelter Grant Program Presentation BACKGROUND: Over the last year, the City has been actively working with City of Spokane and Spokane County to make progress on various challenges regarding homelessness in our region. The following update covers the Bridge Housing Program, Young Adult Shelter, and the impacts associated with both programs and how they relate to the City of Spokane Valley. Bridge Housing Project Background The Regional Bridge Housing Shelter is a shelter that is designed to be the next step for homeless clients who are ready to take on all the responsibilities associated with exiting homelessness. This shelter will not be an emergency night-by-night shelter but will be accessed by referral through the regional coordinated entry system for the homeless population. The shelter is designed to be a continuous stay shelter for up to 90 days with a phased approach that focuses on providing necessary services and allowing greater flexibility as clients progress through the various phases demonstrating greater ability to manage their own affairs. The shelter will provide wrap-around services and transportation and most importantly will provide a stable, safe environment allowing clients to focus on taking the necessary steps to achieving permanent housing and stable income. The City of Spokane is the lead on this shelter. Location The former Spokane Housing Authority Building located at 55 W. Mission Ave. has been purchased by Spokane County utilizing Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security(CARES) funds to address the impact of COVID-19. The immediate use of the building is to provide healthy sheltering while maintaining the existing number of beds but also allowing for appropriate social Page 1 of 5 distancing and space for isolation needs related to COVID-19. The plan is to transition the facility to the Regional Bridge Shelter while still providing distancing during the pandemic. Funding Spokane County set aside $1.5M in Homeless Housing Assistance Act (HHAA) funds for regional shelter capital needs. It was thought that the Bridge Shelter would be a likely candidate for these funds. When CARES funding was used instead to acquire the W. Mission property, the Young Adult Shelter became a candidate for that funding. While County staff earlier indicated that this funding would be made available by the end of the summer, no date has been set to issue the RFP. Spokane County made another$1.5M available through a RFP process that was reviewed by the Housing and Community Development Advisory Committee (HCDAC). The City of Spokane applied for some of this funding to provide operational dollars for the Bridge Shelter. The amount applied for was $750,000 over 18 months. Spokane County Community Service, Housing and Community Development (CSHCD) Director Kathleen Torella presented a Director's Motion to the HCDAC to remove the City of Spokane application from consideration in the HCDAC RFP review process and instead the Director would carry forward a request to the Board of County Commissioners (BOCC)to request the Bridge Shelter project be funded for five years at$500,000 per year for operational purposes. The BOCC did approve this resolution, contingent on HHAA funding being available. The HHAA funding comes from recording fees on real estate transactions from all areas of Spokane County outside of the City of Spokane. City of Spokane Valley staff informed the BOCC at the time of their decision that the City staff and Council was still in the process of evaluating their homeless related needs and identifying priorities for the future and that the City could not, therefore, commit to five years at this time, but rather the original 18-month timeline specified in the RFP. In addition to County/Spokane Valley operational funding, the City of Spokane has committed to$500,000 per year for operational costs, and Avista has committed to $50,000 per year for three years while working through the Avista Foundation to secure financial commitments from other business partners in the community. The Salvation Army (TSA) has been selected as the operator of the Bridge Shelter and their initial budget estimate came in at $3M. City of Spokane staff continues to work with TSA to refine that budget number. If the City of Spokane Valley continues to participate as part of the HCDAC consortium and funding is available then part of the funding provided by the County will be coming from City of Spokane Valley recording fees. Options for Council to consider are: 1.) Maintain an 18-month commitment of HHAA funds; 2.) Commit to five years of operational funding through Spokane Valley HHAA funds; 3.) Commit to five years of HHAA funds with the ability to withdraw at 18 months if Spokane Valley needs and clients are not being served adequately. Timing The funding committed to by the BOCC was for a five-year period beginning on January 1, 2020. Due to the COVID use of the identified facility it is unknown when the Bridge Shelter will become operational. Established timeframes may need to be reconsidered as the Bridge Shelter gets closer to coming online. Spokane Valley Use City of Spokane staff has indicated that this facility will not have any beds reserved for jurisdictions but a list will be developed through coordinated entry and referrals by case managers for individuals that are ready to be served by this facility. The design is for this facility to address the homeless population throughout the region without regard to where the individuals are coming from. Spokane staff have also indicated that this facility is not intended to be a facility to address camping enforcement in various jurisdictions but the intent is to relieve the demand on the emergency night-by-night shelters, freeing up beds that would allow jurisdictions to enforce camping regulations. Page 2 of 5 Young Adult Shelter (YAS) Program Funding Information and Application Process On June 19, 2020, the Department of Commerce (DOC) released an application for new grant funding to develop or expand emergency shelter programs for people experiencing homelessness across Washington State. Maximum allocated funding for the Spokane region is $2,731,000. The funds are for the period of August 2020 through June 2023 and the shelter must be ready for occupancy by December 1, 2020. The Spokane Regional Continuum of Care (CoC) voted to recommend that the City of Spokane act as the lead applicant for the creation of a new YAS. On July 7, 2020, the City of Spokane approached Spokane Valley City Council requesting participation in the City of Spokane's YAS application. City Council was supportive and gave consensus to support the City of Spokane's efforts. On July 23, 2020, the City of Spokane submitted its application to the DOC and identified itself as the "Lead Grantee" and the City of Spokane Valley and Spokane County as "Coordinated Community Applicants." The City of Spokane is responsible for entering into a contract with DOC and is responsible for project delivery. The City of Spokane Valley and Spokane County are not signatories in the contract. YAS: Responsibilities and Delivery During June, July and August, continued coordination between agencies was occurring on two different fronts: first, a weekly regional governance meeting of elected officials and agency administrators, and second, a weekly staff-level coordination meeting. During this time, Spokane Valley regularly reminded the regional governance group that Spokane Valley is only available in a supportive role, regardless of the final location of the YAS. To assist with the effort, Spokane Valley contracted with a commercial realtor to perform a site-selection search. This search identified over 100 sites total, and 53 potential sites that were offered to the regional governance group and staff-level working group for consideration (42 sites were in Spokane, 11 in Spokane Valley). Also, as part of this regional coordination, Spokane Valley staff shared its July 16, 2020, Memorandum that outlined the general zoning and permitting challenges associated with locating the YAS in Spokane Valley. To summarize this memo, there is no permitted zone in Spokane Valley that allows transitional housing as an outright permitting use. Currently, the only zone where this use is allowed is Multifamily and then only with a Conditional Use Permit which generally takes 18 to 40-weeks to complete. This process would not accommodate the December 1, 2020 deadline for having the YAS operational. The Department of Commerce did indicate that an extension may be filed if a plan is in place to fulfill the terms of the grant. Another option is to consider temporary locations such as hotel/motel rooms but only operational funding can be used for this purpose and it appears unlikely that $56/night would cover this expense, requiring supplemental funding and not leaving funding for supportive services. In late August, Spokane appointed Cecily Ferguson of the United Way as the project manager with assistance from Spokane staff. A Request for Proposals (RFP) for a YAS operator was issued September 4, 2020 with the goal of choosing an operator by September 30, 2020. The operator will be responsible for identifying and securing sustained funding beyond the DOC grant's funding window that ends June 2023 and identifying the YAS location. Spokane Valley staff are participating in this endeavor with the intent of making certain all potential sites are considered regardless of the municipality in which they are located. Page 3 of 5 Considerations for Council Spokane Valley Siting - As previously stated, a shelter can only be located in the multi-family residential zone, subject to approval under a conditional use permit. If a property in another zone was to be considered, Council could consider a code text amendment to extend the allowance under the conditional use permit into another zone, or Council could adopt interim zoning regulations that would allow this use in another zone on a temporary basis. Staff does not recommend either of these options due to the potential impacts to the entire zone and instead recommends bringing forward a City Initiated Comprehensive Plan Amendment in 2021 to consider the broader topic of homelessness and how to properly accommodate this within the City's zoning regulations. This process would allow staff, the public, and the Council to fully consider the residential and commercial property stock in the various zones and how these might be affected by this use. A rigorous public input process is required to ensure homeless accommodations within the code are a proper fit for this community. This process would be expected to be complete by late summer or fall of 2021. Regarding the YAS,there is no guarantee the DOC will grant an extension or that the extension would extend far enough to accommodate this timeline. City of Spokane Homelessness Ordinance-The City of Spokane has approved an ordinance (Ord. C35908) that states the City shall not reduce shelter or warming center capacity without providing equivalent capacity or demonstrating the capacity is no longer needed. This applies to shelters within the Spokane City limits. City of Spokane Valley staff has asked for clarification from Spokane staff on how this ordinance would affect either of the shelters being addressed if they were located within our jurisdiction. As both of these shelter projects have unmet funding needs and identified funding sources with ending dates, we feel it is paramount for the Spokane Valley City Council to clarify whether it would consider committing a portion of the General Fund if/when currently identified funding sources are terminated or identified funding sources are insufficient to meet the current capital and operating expenses. OPTIONS: N/A RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Provide feedback on the Regional Bridge Shelter and the Young Adult Shelter jurisdictional roles. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Bridge Housing Program: Spokane County has set aside $1.5M in recording fees from the Homeless Housing Assistance Act (HHAA) funds for a regional shelter. The County intends to issue a Request for Proposals for this purpose in 2020. It was originally thought that the Bridge Shelter would be a likely recipient of those funds but if other funding sources are used to acquire a property that might later be used for the Bridge Shelter, then these HHAA funds would be available for the Young Adult Shelter but would be subject to considering all proposals received. Operational funding of$1,050,000 annually has been committed (18-months by Spokane Valley, three years by Avista, five years by Spokane County) compared to an initial operating budget of $3M presented by TSA, the operator. This currently leaves a$1,950,000 operating deficit. HHAA fees from the County do include Spokane Valley recording fees as well. To date Spokane Valley has committed no additional financial support. Young Adult Shelter: The original grant application incudes $440,000 in capital funds. The likely cost of acquiring a facility is $1.5M to $2M. There is currently $1.5M in HHAA funds the County has not yet made available but Spokane or TSA would be able to apply for these funds for the YAS when the funds are released through a request for proposals process. The remaining DOC grant funds can be used for reimbursement up to $56/night, up to $900,000 annually at full capacity of 44 beds. Spokane staff intend to pursue another state grant early in 2021 to supplement and extend funding length for the YAS. It is not known what Spokane intends to do Page 4 of 5 with the YAS if other funding sources are not acquired prior to the expiration of the initial grant. To date Spokane Valley has committed no additional financial support. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Calhoun, City Manager John Hohman, Deputy City Manager Morgan Koudelka, Senior Contract Analyst ATTACHMENTS: 1. City of Spokane's YAS Application to Dept. of Commerce 2. Potential Site List and City of Spokane Scoring Matrix (sent via John Hohman email on 8/25/20 at 5:49M) 3. Draft Regional Project Charter: Regional Homeless "Continuous Stay" 4. Spokane Homeless Shelter Ordinance Page 5 of 5 Washington State tt y mmm�ent k' of Shelter Program Funding Application Grant Period: August 2020 - June 2023 Version 2 6/25/2020 Submission Deadline: July 17, 2020 by 5:00 p.m. Table of Contents Introduction Program Information Tabs to be completed (highlighted in yellow): FORM A-Applicant Information FORM B-Subgrantee Information (if applicable) FORM C- Program Proposal FORM D -Shelter Services FORM E - Budget Form & Spending Plan FORM F-Certification Award Chart Introduction This Excel workbook contains the information and forms needed to submit a request for the Shelter Program. TABS TO BE COMPLETED: FORM A-Applicant Information FORM B-Subgrantee Information(if applicable) FORM C-Shelter Program Proposal FORM D-Shelter Services FORM E-Budget Form&Spending Plan FORM F-Certification APPLICATION CONTACT Please email questions about the application,and the completed applications and attachments to: Megan Kendig(she/her/hers) Email: megan.kendig@commerce.wa.gov SUBMISSION OF PROPOSALS Please submit completed applications to the Application Contact by 5:00 p.m.on July 17,2020. Commerce reserves the right to reduce or redistribute an allocation if insufficient information is provided in the application, ineligible activities are proposed,or if a grantee lacks demonstrated capacity to administer the grant.Preparation of an application does not guarantee that applicants will receive funds. NO OBLIGATION TO CONTRACT This Application does not obligate the State of Washington or the Department of Commerce to contract for services specified herein. REJECTION OF PROPOSALS The Department of Commerce reserves the right at its sole discretion to reject any and all proposals received without penalty and not I to issue a contract as a result of this application. Program Information Authorizing Statute and Fund Sources Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill 6168(section 127,subsection 85) http://lawfilesext.leq.wa.gov/biennium/2019-20/Pdf/Bills/Session%20Laws/Senate/6168-S.S L.pdf?q=20200617143905 Program Purpose The Department of Commerce intends for communities to use equitable and creative approaches to develop or expand shelter programs and bring people inside with a goal of exiting participants to permanent housing quickly. Grant Period Grant award period August 2020—June 2023 Program Overview The"Program Overview"document is attached to the email with this funding application. Program Requirements 1.Shelter program will enact strategies to ensure racially equitable access and racially equitable outcomes at exit. 2.Shelter rules and policies do not include pre-conditions for receiving shelter,and are narrowly focused on maintaining a safe environment for residents and the community and avoiding exits to unsheltered homelessness. 3.Shelter staff are trained on LGBTQ+competency,racial equity and how to implement trauma informed care. 4.Shelter program provides outreach to unsheltered individuals. 5.Shelter program provides residents with housing stability focused services,including diversion and problem solving.Shelter programs connect shelter residents to mainstream services including behavioral health,chemical dependency,education or workforce training,employment services and permanent supportive housing. 6.Shelter must be available for occupancy by December 2020.In special circumstances,Commerce will consider approval of later occupancy dates.Commerce intends to recapture and redistribute funds for shelters not available for occupancy by the December deadline. 7.Shelter program is consistent with county local homeless housing plans. 8.Direct service providers must enter client data into the Homeless Management Information System. Eligible Applicants Counties,the largest city in each county and cities with populations of more than 25,000 are eligible to apply for funds.Nonprofits and tribal governments are not eligible to apply directly,but are eligible subcontractors of local governments. Funding Formula Because every community in the states needs shelter capacity,funds will be set aside by formula for each county and larger city in the state, divided by population. The"Award Estimate"chart is the last tab of this Application. Coordinated Community Applicants Jurisdictions that submit a joint application from more than 50%of the eligible applicants in the county will be awarded 25%more funds than jurisdictions that apply alone.Joint applications must include signatures of concurrency from each of the jurisdictions applying jointly,and will be awarded a single contract that can be subcontracted to other jurisdictions and organizations as described in the application. Stand Alone Jurisdiction Applicants Eligible applicants not participating in a Coordinated Community Application may apply individually,but will receive less funding than if they applied as part of a Coordinated Community Application.After initial awards to Coordinated Communities and Stand Alone applicants,any remaining funds will be distributed proportionately to Coordinated Community Applicants,further incentivizing community coordination. Applicant Information Name of Organization/Department: Community,Housing,and Human Services Department,City of Spokane Mailing Address: 808 W.Spokane Falls Blvd. Physical Address(if different than mailing address): City: Spokane Zip Code: 99201 Statewide Vendor Number(SWV): SWV0003387-03 Unified Business Number(UBI): 328-013-877 Contact Information Contact person for application: Name/title Matt Davis-Homeless Program Professional Phone 509-625-6815 Email mrdavis@spokanecity.org Applicant Type: County Government X City Government Executive Program Manager Finance/ Data manager This is the person who will sign the This is the person who is the bookkeeper This is the person who we grant agreement with Commerce. primary grant contact with This is the person who we will will contact with questions Commerce. contact with questions about about HMIS data. invoices. Name: Tim Sigler Matt Davis Skyler Brown David Lewis Title: Director Homeless Program Professional Grants and Contracts Financial HMIS Manager Phone: 509-625-6055 509-625-6815 509.625.6294 509.625.6051 Email: tsigler@spokanecity.org mrdavis@spokanecity.org sbrown@spokanecity.org dglewis@spokanecity.org Subgrantee Information If more than one subgrantee will be funded,please copy this tab and complete this form for each. Name of Organization: Mailing Address: Physical Address(if different than mailing address): City: Zip Code: County(ies)served: Subgrantee Type: County Government City Government Council of Governments Nonprofit community/neighborhood based organization Housing Authority Federally recognized Indian tribe in the State of WA Finance/ Program Manager Data manager Executive bookkeeper This is the person who is the This is the person who we This is the person who will sign the This is the person who we will primary grant contact with will contact with questions grant agreement with Commerce. contact with questions about Commerce. about HMIS data. invoices. Name: Title: Phone: Email: Program Proposal Review all of the questions below first. If more than one shelter program will be funded,please copy this tab and answer the following questions for each program. 1. Provide a summary description of how the funds will be used,including a description of program structure,type,target population and services.Word limit 750. These funds will be used to establish a new shelter for young adults,age 18-24,who are experiencing homelessness within Spokane County.While advocates for youth and young adults(YYA)experiencing homelessness in this community have long highlighted the challenges faced by young adults in successfully interfacing with the adult shelter system,this gap in the regional homelessness crisis response system became especially evident during the summer of 2017 with the WA State 100 Day Youth Homelessness Challenge.Despite systemic and programmatic changes made in the wake of the 100-Day Challenge,the CoC's by-name list of youth and young adults indicates that large unsheltered young adult population persists within Spokane County. Through comprehensive analysis of use patterns by young adults of the adult shelter system,coordinated entry,and the youth by-name list (YBNL),the Spokane Regional Continuum of Care(CoC)has determined that an emergency shelter for this population is the most strategic and expedient use of these funds.Based on data from the YBNL,Spokane County consistently sees 50-60 young adults experiencing unsheltered homelessness on a monthly basis.The desired inventory for the shelter would thus be 50-60 however,we are proposing the creation of 43 beds in accordance with the$56/bed-night and$10K/new bed created reimbursement rate for the program.The utilization method would be night-by-night or drop-in in order to meet the emergent needs of young people. The facility will operate 24/7 with a separate day center space accessible to young people to participate in communal and recreational activities,engage with case managers as well as other service providers,and access other necessary service such as hygiene.The program will work closely with the YouthREACH street outreach team operated by Volunteers of America(VOA)and the singles coordinated entry system led by Spokane Neighborhood Action Partners(SNAP).A diversion-first model will be implemented whereby staff will engage participants in collaborative,creative problem-solving conversations in an effort to resolve their housing crisis. The facility will have sufficient office space for program staff as well as other mainstream youth/young adult service providers who may co- locate their programs with the shelter or offer"office hours"at the site.On the advice of the CoC's Coordinated Entry Workgroup and the Spokane Homeless Youth Advisory Board,the CoC will also establish a new homeless youth coordinated entry system at this site to manage the assessment,prioritization,and referral processes for youth-serving housing programs. 2.Describe existing partnerships with youth and young adult homeless service providers in your jurisdiction.Do adequate shelter services exist in your jurisdiction?If not,how will this funding be used to serve youth and young adults experiencing homelessness? Word limit 500. Many youth and young adult homeless service providers participate in the Spokane Regional Continuum of Care.The largest provider of these services within Spokane County is Volunteers of America of Eastern Washington and Northern Idaho(VOA).VOA offers many programs to help young people experiencing homeless achieve stable housing including Crosswalk Teen Shelter(13-17),Alexandria's House Maternity Group Home(16-20),and a diverse array of transitional housing models for young adults(18-24).Other key programs include Spokane Neighborhood Actions Partners'(SNAP)rapid rehousing for young adults(18-24)and Youth,Family,and Adult(YFA)Connections' Crisis Resident Center(CRC)/HOPE program(12-17).The primary gap for this population is an emergency shelter for young adults(18-24). Without adequate shelter,young adults within Spokane County struggle to utilize the permanent housing resources the CoC has allocated for this population.Young people are struggling to survive unsheltered or to navigate adult spaces not tailored for their specific needs. 3.Describe existing partnerships with domestic violence programs and shelters in your jurisdiction.Do adequate shelter services exist in your jurisdiction?If not,how will this funding be used to serve people who are fleeing domestic violence? Word limit 500. Many victim services providers participate in the Spokane Regional Continuum of Care.The primary provider of housing assistance to victims of domestic violence is YWCA Spokane.YWCA provides shelter to families and individuals experiencing homelessness due to domestic violence in both a facility-based model within the City of Spokane(36 beds)and master-leased apartments in the City of Spokane Valley(12 beds).Additionally,the YWCA and Catholic Charities of Eastern Washington(CCEW)operate a rapid rehousing programs for households fleeing domestic violence.Within the Spokane Regional Continuum of Care,the Homeless Families Coordinated Entry system prioritizes families who are fleeing domestic violence for transitional housing beds at two programs:the Transitional Living Center(42 beds) operated by Transitions and St.Margaret's transitional housing program(24 beds)operated by CCEW.Transitions also operates a transitional housing program for individual women,Miryam's House(9 beds).Priority for this program is given to victims of domestic violence. 4.Describe how the shelter program is consistent with the county's local homeless housing Plan.Identify specifically in the Plan where the program meets the goals and objectives.Word limit 500. The need to address the unsheltered young adult population is specifically referred to in the 2020-2025 Spokane City/County Strategic Plan to End and Prevent Homelessness in Section 6.4.1.Not only is ending unsheltered youth and young adult homelessness a key benchmark in the federal definition for ending youth/young adult homelessness(which the Spokane City/County CoC has adopted),it is also one of the main goals of Spokane's participation in the WA State Anchor Communitiy Intitiative,the strategic model of which drives the Spokane CoC's efforts to around youth homelessness. 5.Describe the type of shelter site/facility that will be utilized.Is the program drop-in/night-by-night or continuous stay?Word limit 500. The proposed young adult shelter will operate on a night-by-night or drop-in model.The desired location will be close to public transit lines, local institutions of higher education,and ample entry-level employment opportunities.In accordance with advice from Spokane Homeless Youth Advisory Board,the location should be close to centralized services,but outside the downtown core of the City of Spokane.The facility will also have secure check-in space,office space for shelter staff and any co-located providers,a large space to serve as a common area for the day center component of the program,ADA-accessible bathrooms with showers and other amenitities to serve the hygiene needs of patrons,an area for gear storage,and a small kitchenette with sink,microwave,and fridge. 6.Provide a proposed implementation timeline,including activities prior to occupancy.What date will all new shelter beds will be occupied by?Word limit 500. Beginning of August—City of Spokane is awarded funds End of August—City of Spokane has site-control of desired facility Beginning of September—Operator is selected by committee composed of,at a minimum,City of Spokane,City of Spokane Valley,and Spokane County staff as well as young people with lived experience. End of September—Operator collaborates with committee on design of shelter space.Grant agreement is executed. End of October—Staff are hired by operator.Necessary renovations are completed. Beginning of November—100%of beds are ready for occupation. 7.Provide an account of existing shelter capacity in the jurisdiction on January 1,2020 and the net increase in shelter capacity that will be added. If a date other than January 1,2020 illustrates a more accurate representation of shelter capacity in your community,please use the most accurate date. Word limit 500. As of July 2020,in Spokane County there are 60 year-round night-by-night beds for families,108 for women,101 for men,53 for households fleeing DV,and 18 for unaccompanied minors.There are 87 continuous stay beds for families and 15 for unaccompanied minors.Additionally shelter inventory includes 41 medical respite beds for men and women experiencing homelessness who are discharged from medical facilities,186 beds for men and 100 beds for women and children where sobriety is a requirement,102 seasonal warming center beds for adult men and women and 60 seasonal warming center beds for families extended in order to maintain healthy sheltering during the COVID-19 pandemic.No beds dedicated for young adults 18-24 exist within Spokane County.This proposal will create 43 new beds for young adults. 8.If the shelter program is serving a specific subpopulation,such as youth and young adults,families or households fleeing violence, demonstrate the need to increase shelter capacity in your jurisdiction for the subpopulation using local data and program inventory.Word limit 500. Homeless Housing Project Expenditure Report can be found here:https://deptofcommerce.box.com/s/n29repx742s41gfpmsv992vntxas6ugx Point in Time Count Reports can be found here:https://www.commerce.wa.gov/serving-communities/homelessness/annual-point-time-count/ Through participation in the Anchor Community Initiative,the Spokane Regional Continuum of Care has established a quality by-name list (BNL)of youth and young adults experiencing homelessness.Data from the BNL consistently indicates a population of 50-60 unsheltered young adults within Spokane County.From July 2019 to June 2020,320 of the unique individuals that accessed the Spokane Regional Singles Homeless Coordinated Entry system were between the ages of 18 and 24,15%of all individuals that touched that system that year. 166 of that 320(52%)indicated that they were staying in a place not meant for human habitation.Only 31 of the 320 young adults who accessed coordinated entry had also accessed the adult shelter system.During that same time period,young adults accounted for 7%of all patrons served by Spokane County's two main low barrier shelters for adult men and women;102 unique young people.Spokane Regional Continuum of Care's Youth Advisory Board tells us that young people do not access adult shelters in most cases due to concerns about safety amongst the older adult population and lack of age appropriate services. 9.If the shelter beds are utilized for sobriety focused shelter where there is a clean and sober requirement,demonstrate the need for additional sobriety focused shelter options in your jurisdiction using local data and program inventory. Word limit 500. Homeless Housing Project Expenditure Report can be found here:https://deptofcommerce.box.com/s/n29repx742s41gfpmsv992vntxas6ugx No shelter beds created by these funds will require participants to remain clean and sober as a contigency of their continued tenancy with the shelter.It is the intention of the Spokane Regional Continuum of Care that publicly funded shelter beds remain as low barrier as possible while providing adequate access treatment resources if that is part of a household's journey to permanent housing. 10.Provide an estimate of the average length of stay in the program.Word limit 500. If the program is currently utilizing HMIS,performance dashboards can be found here:https://www.commerce.wa.gov/serving- communities/homelessness/homeless-s ystem-performance/ In accordance the Spokane City/County 5-Year Performance Management Plan,the target average length of stay for this night-by-night shelter will be 30 days. 11.Provide an estimate of the percentage of exits from the shelter program to permanent destinations and positive outcomes. Word limit 500. Positive Outcomes from Street Outreach as defined by HUD System Performance 7:https://files.hudexchange.info/resources/documents/System- Performance-Measure-7-Housing-Destination-Summary.pdf) If the program is currently utilizing HMIS,performance dashboards can be found here:https://www.commerce.wa.gov/serving- communities/homelessness/homeless-s ystem-performance/ In accordance the Spokane City/County 5-Year Performance Management Plan,the target rate of exits to permanent housing desinations for this night-by-night shelter will be 50%. If more than one program will be funded,please copy this tab and answer the following questions for each program. 12.Describe how problem-solving conversations will be used to divert households from entering the shelter or utilizing crisis response system services longer term. Word limit 500. The Spokane Regional Continuum of Care's governance structure includes the Empowered Solutions Learning Community,a subcommittee composed staff who have completed the Center for Dialog and Resolution's(CDR)diversion train-the-trainer course and lead the devlopment and implementation of the CoC's diversion strategy.The Empowered Solutions group will provide all young adult shelter staff with the locally tailored version of CDR's 2-day diversion basics training.Additionally,through participation in the Anchor Community Initiative,the Spokane Regional CoC is working to establish a centralized diversion fund(CDF)program for youth and young adults(YYA).Participants in the diversion learning community for YYA will have access to diversion training tailored to the unique needs and strengths of young people and centralized pot of flexible funding adminstered by Volunteers of America(VOA).The selected young adult shelter operator will be required to participate in the YYA diversion learning community. 13.Describe the philosophies,service models,and best practices that will be utilized.Specifically describe how services are trauma-informed and how housing case management is implemented. Word limit 500. Because the target population for this program will be young adults,the foundation philosophy driving service provision will be Positive Youth Development(PYD).The PYD perspective highlights the unique strengths and assets young people possess and is meant to create spaces where young people have the opportunity to flourish and explore their potential.This means the shelter must be a space that promotes the physical and emotional safety of participants and where rules and expectations are clear and transparent,supportive relationships between peers and older adults are fostered,and opportunities for self-exploration/identity formation through skill building and(re)connection to family and community are ample.Another fundamental philosophy underpinning the young adult shelter will be the Housing First approach.This approach to service provision means that staff will take for granted that all residents are ready for and deserving of permanent housing.Access to case management that will support participants'transition from shelter to permanent housing will be based on clients'choice to engage with these services.A Harm Reduction approach will be appropriate as well.The goal of this shelter will be to provide safety and access to permanent housing resources for the hardest to reach young people.Given the reality that addiction and substance use are a part of many participants'lives,zero tolerance policies for alcohol and substance use present an unnecessary barrier to access for this target population.The above stated practices(promoting client autonomy to help rebuild a sense of control,highlighting young people's strengths and helping them capitalize on those strengths,a focus on physical and emotional safety)are all components of Trauma-Informed Care(TIC).TIC in a shelter space means acknowledging that the experience of homelessness is inherently traumatic as it deprives people of their basic needs and subjects them to dangerous and unpredictable circumstances.The experience of trauma can impact individuals'ability to respond to stress in healthy and productive ways due to the conscious or subconscious perception of danger.Staff will need to be able to acknowledge that certain behaviors from participants are likely the result of trauma.Participants will need to be empowered to understand how trauma impacts their life through opportunities such as understanding their ACES score.The best way to ensure that TIC is core to the young adult shelter's service model will be to include to Spokane Homeless Youth Advisory Board in the design of both the physical space and the program model as paid consultants.This will be made possible by a generous grant from A Way Home Washington to bolster the CoC's youth engagement efforts. 14.Describe strategies that will be implemented to prevent racial inequities in who is served and program outcomes. Word limit 500. The strategy to address racial inequities in who is served and in program outcomes begins with the operator selection process.Applicants to the young adult shelter RFP will be required to address their agencies'racial equity strategies and philosphies and provide evidence of culturally competant service provision.The selected operator will be required to provide staff with approved racial equity training as a part of a regular curriculum.Key partners in providing adequate training include Better Health Together,a local leader in addressing racial inequities in nonprofit service provision,and A Way Home WA,the sponsor for the Anchor Community Initiative and a leader elevating the voices of young people of color who experience homeless at greater rates than their white peers.Additionally,Spokane Homeless Youth Advisory Board,a diverse group of young people with lived experience of homelessness,will act as paid consultants in the design of both the physical space of the shelter and the program itself.Lastly,the grant agreement with the operator will include equity measures centered around assessing permanent housing outcomes for young people of color(as well as for LGBQ+and trans/non-binary young adults)as compared to the general shelter population to measure the effectiveness of the equity strategies implemented. 15.Describe how the program will collaborate with other mainstream providers inside and outside of the homeless crisis response system. Word limit 500. The City of Spokane is seeking a location that offers sufficient office space to facilitate either the co-location of mainstream service providers or adequate offices for such providers to offer office hours at the shelter.Desired partners include providers of legal assistance,behavioral health supports,and educational/employment services.All of these service sectors are represented by member organizations of the CoC's Subcommittee of Ending Youth Homelessness.The CoC will look to its member organizations to estimate the costs and benefits of full or partial co-location at the selected site as compared to other forms of partnership.Key partners include:Team Child for legal servics;The Next Gen Zone(the regional WIOA youth one-stop),Career Path Services,and the Community Colleges of Spokane for educational and employment supports;and Excelsior Wellness Center,Daybreak Youth Services,Frontier Behavioral Health,and the Seven Nations Healing Lodge for behavioral health. 16.Explain how the shelter program will participate in the local Coordinated Entry process.Word limit 500. The young adult shelter staff for both the overnight stay and drop-in center components of the program,will be trained satellie assessors for Spokane Regional Singles Homeless Coordinated Entry System.The Spokane Regional CE system uses a diversion-first approach so staff will also be trained in the Spokane CoC's Empowered Diversion Learning Community certified trainers.Participants that are unable to resolve their homelessness through diversion supports may complete a housing prioritization assessment(the Youth-Service Prioritization Decision Assistance Tool)and be referred to an appropriate housing intervention.Within 1 year from opening,the CoC expects that young adult shelter site will also be the site of the main offices for the Continuum's new Homeless Youth Coordinated Entry System.Staff will walk alongside participants in their journey to permanent housing,providing tailored support in the housing search and document acquisition process based on participants'needs and choice. Budget Form and S ending Plan Complete yellow highlighted sections.If funding more than one project,copy a blank version of this page into the workbook and complete a separate budget. Shelter Project Name: Young Adult Shelter Is this project already set up in HMIS? No If yes,HMIS project name? N/A Jurisdictions Participating in Application Amount for each Jurisdictions Amount for jurisdiction (see Participating each Award Chart)add in Application jurisdiction additional rows as (see Award needed and Chart) provide total Example: City of Spokane $ 1,291,685.36 Thurston County $ 879,563 City of Spokane Valley $ 562,755.89 Spokane County(Unincorporated) $ 876,659 Lacey $ 313,085 TOTAL Available Funding $ 2,731,100 TOTAL Available Funding $ 1,192,648 Aug-20 Sep-20 Oct-20 Nov-20 Dec-20 Jan-21 Costs of creating beds pior to occupancy $ 200,000 $ 130,000 $ 100,000 Shelter beds occupied 43 43 43 Reimbursement from Commerce for beds $ 71,910.00 $ 71,910.00 $ 71,910.00 TOTAL $ 200,000 $ 130,000 $ 100,000 $ 71,910 $ 71,910 $ 71,910 Daily reimbursement rate(cannot exceed$56) $ - $ - $ - $ 56 $ 56 $ 56 TOTAL Budgeted Funds(August 2020 through June2023) $ 2,731,100 Example: Aug-20 Sep-20 Oct-20 Nov-20 Dec-20 Jan-21 Costs of creating beds pior to occupancy $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 50,000 Shelter beds occupied 10 10 10 Reimbursement from Commerce for beds $ 16,200 $ 16,200 $ 16,200 TOTAL $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 50,000 $ 16,200 $ 16,200 $ 16,200 Daily reimbursement rate(cannot exceed$56) $ - $ - $ - $ 54 $ 54 $ 54 TOTAL Budgeted Funds(August 2020 through June 2023) $ 424,000 Feb-21 Mar-21 Apr-21 May-21 Jun-21 Jul-21 Aug-21 Sep-21 Oct-21 Nov-21 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 $ 71,910.00 $ 71,910.00 $ 71,910.00 $ 71,910.00 $ 71,910.00 $ 71,910.00 $ 71,910.00 $ 71,910.00 $ 71,910.00 $ 71,909.00 $ 71,910 $ 71,910 $ 71,910 $ 71,910 $ 71,910 $ 71,910 $ 71,910 $ 71,910 $ 71,910 $ 71,909 $ 56 $ 56 $ 56 $ 56 $ 56 $ 56 $ 56 $ 56 $ 56 $ 56 Feb-21 Mar-21 Apr-21 May-21 Jun-21 Jul-21 Aug-21 Sep-21 Oct-21 Nov-21 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 $ 16,200 $ 16,200 $ 16,200 $ 16,200 $ 16,200 $ 16,200 $ 16,200 $ 16,200 $ 16,200 $ 16,200 $ 16,200 $ 16,200 $ 16,200 $ 16,200 $ 16,200 $ 16,200 $ 16,200 $ 16,200 $ 16,200 $ 16,200 $ 54 $ 54 $ 54 $ 54 $ 54 $ 54 $ 54 $ 54 $ 54 $ 54 Dec-21 Jan-22 Feb-22 Mar-22 Apr-22 May-22 Jun-22 Jul-22 Aug-22 Sep-22 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 $ 71,909.00 $ 71,909.00 $ 71,909.00 $ 71,909.00 $ 71,909.00 $ 71,909.00 $ 71,909.00 $ 71,909.00 $ 71,909.00 $ 71,909.00 $ 71,909 $ 71,909 $ 71,909 $ 71,909 $ 71,909 $ 71,909 $ 71,909 $ 71,909 $ 71,909 $ 71,909 $ 56 $ 56 $ 56 $ 56 $ 56 $ 56 $ 56 $ 56 $ 56 $ 56 Dec-21 Jan-22 Feb-22 Mar-22 Apr-22 May-22 Jun-22 Jul-22 Aug-22 Sep-22 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 $ 16,200 $ 16,200 $ 16,200 $ 16,200 $ 16,200 $ 16,200 $ 16,200 $ 16,200 $ 16,200 $ 16,200 $ 16,200 $ 16,200 $ 16,200 $ 16,200 $ 16,200 $ 16,200 $ 16,200 $ 16,200 $ 16,200 $ 16,200 $ 54 $ 54 $ 54 $ 54 $ 54 $ 54 $ 54 $ 54 $ 54 $ 54 Oct-22 Nov-22 Dec-22 Jan-23 Feb-23 Mar-23 Apr-23 May-23 Jun-23 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 $ 71,909.00 $ 71,909.00 $ 71,909.00 $ 71,909.00 $ 71,909.00 $ 71,909.00 $ 71,909.00 $ 71,909.00 $ 71,909 $ 71,909 $ 71,909 $ 71,909 $ 71,909 $ 71,909 $ 71,909 $ 71,909 $ 71,909 $ 71,909 $ 56 $ 56 $ 56 $ 56 $ 56 $ 56 $ 56 $ 56 $ 56 Oct-22 Nov-22 Dec-22 Jan-23 Feb-23 Mar-23 Apr-23 May-23 Jun-23 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 $ 16,200 $ 16,200 $ 16,200 $ 16,200 $ 16,200 $ 16,200 $ 16,200 $ 16,200 $ 16,200 $ 16,200 $ 16,200 $ 16,200 $ 16,200 $ 16,200 $ 16,200 $ 16,200 $ 16,200 $ 16,200 $ 54 $ 54 $ 54 $ 54 $ 54 $ 54 $ 54 $ 54 $ 54 Certification Lead Grantee Applicant-Executive Signature I certify that the information presented in this application is true and correct and agree to the Program Requirements. I authorize the submission to the Department of Commerce for consideration of funding as the Lead Grantee. Organization: City of Spokane Executive Name: Tim Sigler Title: Director- Community,Housing, and Human Services Date: 7/21/2020 Signature Coordinated Applicant-Executive Signature Joint applications must include signatures from each of the jurisdictions applying as Coordinated Community Applicants. Please modify/add signature lines as needed to this form. I certify that the information presented in this application is true and correct to my best knowledge and agree to the Program Requirements. Organization: O , Executive Name: Ge- Title: CR, Date: 1 is12 cy Signs ure Organization: �� Executive Nam,�j ark (ILOUlq Title: C1��akar' Dater — Signature r41kik Washington State 0 D� e�p�arm en erce Shelter Grant Program August 1, 2020-June 30, 2023 $ - $ - Spokane Spokane County $ - $ - Spokane Unincorporated $ 701,327 $ 876,659 Spokane Incorporated $ - $ - Spokane Airway Heights $ - $ - Spokane Cheney $ - $ - Spokane Deer Park $ - $ - Spokane Fairfield $ - $ - Spokane Latah $ - $ - Spokane Liberty Lake $ - $ - Spokane Medical Lake $ - $ - Spokane Millwood $ - $ - Spokane Rockford $ - $ - Spokane Spangle $ - $ - Spokane Spokane $ 1,033,348 $ 1,291,685 Spokane Spokane Valley $ 450,205 $ 562,756 Spokane Waverly $ - $ - Total $ 2,184,880 $ 2,731,100 Adam Jackson From: John Hohman Sent: Tuesday,August 25, 2020 5:49 PM To: Gemmill, Gerry; Kuney, Mary; Beggs, Breean; Mark Calhoun; Schmidt,Ariane;Woodward, Nadine; Ben Wick; Cote, Brandy; 'Latisha.hill@avistacorp.com'; 'Meyer, Kristine' Cc: Morgan Koudelka;Adam Jackson Subject: Young Adult Shelter List Attachments: YAS Site List, Scoring Matrix v6.xlsx Executive Committee, Please see the attached excel file that has two tabs. Sharing this file is intended to serve as Spokane Valley's supportive participation towards the City of Spokane's Young Adult Shelter(YAS)grant application submitted to the Department of Commerce. Tabs included are as follows: 1. Potential Site List—A collection of potential sites that may satisfy YAS needs.This list summarizes the drop box folder prepared and populated by our contracted commercial realtor over the last few weeks. Sites included in this list do not consider jurisdictional boundaries in order to maximize the potential site list. Our original intention was for all sites to be prioritized by a site selection group comprised of Spokane, Spokane Valley, and Spokane County staff, however,the progress of this group has been delayed due to the direction that sites in Spokane are no longer being considered. The exclusion of sites in the City of Spokane was not indicated in the application for funding nor included in any presentations made to the Spokane Valley City Council, BOCC, and HCDAC. Spokane Valley's hiring of a realtor was our attempt to participate in the property search and help move the process along. It has never been Spokane Valley's intention to assume responsibility for the site selection process, merely to assist in getting the process of locating a potential property underway. It has always been our position that we will support Spokane when possible while knowing that the project is reliant on Spokane and Spokane County staff resources, experience, and expertise for a successful implementation. 2. YAS Scoring Matrix—This is an evaluation "checklist"that was provided by Spokane staff. We believe this checklist is related to others used by Spokane staff to locate similar facilities. Hopefully this information can be helpful in moving the property search forward. We're looking forward to discussing this on Thursday. Thanks, John 1 Young Adult Shelter-Site Selection-Potential Site List Date:8-20-20 The following list was compiled by Doug Byrd,of Byrd Real Estate Group.The properties identified below are generally ranked by''A'',"B"antl"C"but all sites require verification of grouping/ranking by the site selection staff group.The list was intended to be prioritized on August 18th,2020,as part of the regularly scheduled site selection group meeting;however Spokane staff informed the sRe selection staff group that sites within Spokane city limits would not be allowed.Asa result,a prioritized"short list" was not created antl the group needed darity/dirertion on next steps. Site Selection Staff Group Participants: Scott Rasmussen(Co5) Morgan Koudelka(Co5V) Matt Davis(Co5) Adam Jackson(Co5V) Tim Crowley(SC) file Order detads(intended to follow drupbos mum it:T un): PnorB8A Sites worth closer consideration Priority6 Sites that may/may not work Priority C Sites that probably will not work Numeric order following A-,B-,or C',is order in dropbor(NOT PRIORITV/HANKING) -Z refers toZoning issues in Spokane Valley which will NOT accommodate a Dec.1,2020 deadline -MT refers to Multi-Tenant properties -Lease refers to properies available for lease only File Order Street Address City limits File Location Cost Bldg SF Land SF Bldg$/SF Comments A01 112&115E 1n Spokane A $ 4,311%000 42,743 40,000 $ 101 These can be split Need to discuss with CoS team.Former Crosswalk facility.(NOT AVAILABLE NOW, A02 525W 2nd Spokane A 16,659 7,100 MACWORK IN THE lumps) (pending current offer)new addition,good price,extra space.Not likely to be A03 417&425 W 2nd Spokane A 5 1,195,000 38,000 21,300 5 31 approved? A04 622E 2nd Spokane A $ 1,050,000 7,368 $ 143 LEASE,could maybe be bought for 1,050,000,(this seems overpriced) A05 808E Sprague Spokane A $ 1,900,000 17,568 46,609 5 108 bigger than needed. A06 2607N Division Spokane A 5 1,500,000 7,740 29,000 5 194 potential A file? Is this too close to 55 W mission and the Arena?Heated portion might be too small.body and paint shop might have environmental concerns. A07 1015 N OM R. Spokane A $ 450,000 6,700 7,600 $ 67 A08 301W Indiana Spokane A $ 1,050,000 9,344 13,100 $ 112 too close to mission site?Move to b/c? A09(•ZONING•) 13018,1303 N Pines Spokane Valley A $ 1,530,000 9,650 71,016 $ 161 out of the way,permitting challenges? A10 130E Sprague Spokane A 5 850,000 6,420 16,055 $ 132 too downtown? A-)easel 530E North foothills Spokane A 7,000 $ LEASE,DB call in to ask if it can be bought. A-lease) 201Rf Riverside Spnkanr A 6,2fN1 $ M0Rotenant,partially leased already. A-tease3 441W Slimp Spokane A 6,000 5 - lease,could be bought if a good offer.Move lu A Fie? 801 200E2nd Spokane B $ 679,000 5,222 8,712 5 130 602 960E 3rd Spokane B $ 1,20,0 00 6,360 79,604 $ 189 m0V0 in B:erisimg offer pending,rnvtrn 1591es larsnir fill rmsite 5450k in fix) muff ple units for lease?Could work,but not in good location to serve our demographic? 603 11RS Division Spokane B 1161R 5 - Immrdiatrfy adjareni to HOC and accompanying CC properties. Mare only+Could work,but not in good location to serve our demographic? 604 1305 Division Spokane B 24,000 $ _ Same as site above B05 319 W 3rd Spokane B $ 549,000 7,100 7,100 $ 77 too"downtown"? this is old restaurant in industrail area_In a for plumming and location only_ Ann.Fannies.It smmed like someone already looked at this and said no.Is that right,Scott?Proximity to SIC and central location is good.Price and size is good. Very industrial area.While many have talked about a preference to locatea sheer in an industrial area other have said that is an incompatible use.Would be good to know what is allowable in Spokane. 606 3827E Boone Spokane B 5 799,000 9,510 34,848 $ 84 607 230N Division Spokane B ? 11,137 41,187 lease,but may sell?Fixer upper too downtown? Ali oss drum current Crumwak but in hears of down town.Peke might be high, 808 1655 Howard Spokane 5 1,850,000 13,262 14,200 5 139 historic registry might restrict modifications. 609 1575 Monroe Spokane LEASE 810 5201 N Market Spokane $ 1,260,000 27,000 $ 44 Verify Bldg SF,in Hillyad(is that ok?) B11 5615 E Trent Spokane $ 1,300,000 4,896 19,166 $ 266 Subway still occupies space? 612 1730N Division(White elephant) Spokane $ 1,739,000 11,494 49,700 $ 99 old Apartment budding at SW corner of nova/ruby(needs rend) 64rasrl 1JSf Frmina Spokane 77 psf 10,650 btreoe2 2909N Cnn11ine 51 Spokeme 3S00 jmonlh 7,292 57,503 yewioduslriel site,will need lob of wink. B-Lease3 3916 N Division Spokane 16psf 6,000 24760 CoS Matt toured this? B-Lease4 1007N Freya Spokane 3000/month 5,556 18,979 B-Lease5 2943N Lee Spokane 2200/month 5,000 16,599 4500 SF warehouse+500 SF office owned by H.Douglas,move to C?Too far north? B-Lease6 65,N Lidgerwood Spokane B 9.75 psf 9,961 49,950 For Lease,could be Bought(price is assumed).Lots of Work required to be ready for beds. Good proximity to lobs antl education.Far enough from residential to escape NIMBV possibly.Fairy close to Truth Ministries if that is a concern.Neighboohoo0 is improving from what it once was.It looks like only part of the building is available antl might be co-located with industrial uses which would likely take R B-Lease7 120N Magnolia Spokane B $ 700,000 47,320 108,750 $ 15 out of the running. B-lease8 3235Sherman Spokane B 4500/month 1J,538 sublease,almost zero parking B-Lease9 3335E Trent Spokane B 4450/month 8,760 28,750 bound by tacks antl freya/green overpass(not peel-friendly) B-Multi-Tenant) 1011 E200 Spokane B 1.50 psf/mo nth 6,000 B-Multi-Tenant2 4020EMain Spokane B 3000/month 7,000 mulit-tenant,lots of spaces,main near Havana-proximity to services? B-Multi-Tenant3(`CONING 6206 E Trent Spokane Valley B 10600/month 21,21J n ear trent antl fancher-proximity to services? B-21(`ZONING`) 5714E 1st Ave Spokane Valley B $ 975,000 28,320 20,480 $ 34 Sold.Lease ONLY.Not in a permittable zone. The opposite end of the same neighborhood the responded so passionately about B-22(`ZONING`) 5105E 3rd Spokane Valley B 10,666 42,941 $ _ the Grocery Outlet building.Price a.size may work. Lease ONLY?Not in a permittable site. We toured this property for the Bridge Shelter search.Same issue with proximity o the Grocery Outlet neighborhood.Sale price likely too expensive,lease might B-23(`ZONING`) 5221E 3rd Spokane Valley B $ 1,950,000 13,1J2 80,000 $ 148 work but would be tight. B-24(`ZONING`) 5908 E Broadway Spokane Valley B $ 365,000 7,394 18,101 $ 49 of premitted use Old Roller Valley.Will check on condition of building.looks like it would requirea code text amendment to our zoning matrix.Smiles from SCC.While on bus lines it is a 37 minute trip on the bus to SCC.Proximity to some services antl B-25(`ZONING`) 9415 E 4th(dishman mica) Spokane Valley B $ 1,400,000 21,900 $ 64 employment.Need to determine if it has fire suppression. Goodtymes Bar-Easy transit access.Likely resistance from neighborhood.Price may be high for square footage.Looks like they are trying to keep it B-26(`ZONING`) 9214 E Mission Spokane Valley B $ 1,700,000 6,107 42,963 $ 278 bar/restaurant. 0o far south? B-ZJ(`ZONING`) 12135 Pines Spokane Valley B $ 850,000 8,901 37,205 $ 95 Fairly remote.Price is good.Proximity to residential may be a problem. ?-1 821 E 3rd Spokane ? $ 800,000 40,000 51,215 $ 20 Sold.Not available.old Shogun site,lots of work requried. This is a duplicate of the project in the B-zoning file,but as a lease,not as a sale. ?-2 9415 E 4th(dishman mica) Spokane Valley ? 7200/month 21,900 Also,some of the property is leased as''storage'' ?3 9415E 4th(dishman mica) Spokane Valley ? $ 1,400,000 21,900 $ 64 This is a duplicate of the project in the B-zoning file ?-4 As built floor plans? This is the allied safe bldg downtown,not available,an delete ?-5 3221 N Market Spokane ? $ 599,000 19,200 25,000 $ 31 not a likely candidate,however,waiting to hear back from broker ?6 2106N Monroe Spokane ? 8ps1 6,678 18,000 may be occupied,waiting to hear back from broker ?-J 512E Pacific Spokane ? 5.45 psi 9,000 14,200 leased,not available,an delete ?3 1827EPacific Spokane ? 10,382 14,200 $ _ DB:Property owner may be interested in supporting a VAS,maybe lease ?-9 1315Sherman Spokane ? $ 425,000 6,372 $ 67 sold,not available,can delete. OIL with WS000 site not likely available for our use on our timeline. Not Iirted in dropbox E Ermina?(near SCC) Spokane ? Young Adult Shelter Site Selection Scoring Matrix Score 1 (low score) -4 (high score) Proximity to Higher Ed Institutions Proximity to Entry-Level Employment Proximity to Bus Routes Proximity to Other Services Proximity Residential Areas Proximity to Medical Care ADA Accessibility Cost Required Sq. Ft. (5,000-7,000 sqft min) Floor Plan Sleeping Area Arrangement(40-50 beds) 8-10 office spaces for operator and co-location of other service providers Personal Belongings Storage Area Restroom and Showers Isolation capacity IT Infrastructure Parking Existing Life Safety Systems (Fire and Sprinkler) Existing Cooking Facilities Existing Adequate exiting (Egress, stairways, Elevators, Emergency Lighting) Time needed to prep prior to move in (4-ready 1-lots of work) Required Zoning Adjustments/Changes Totals Si'jt_)KAN', r111N ■1�■■A« Regional Project Charter s3iiln ai „0,000Va11ey: 20 - 0 4 4 0 Project Title: Regional Bridge Housing Center: "The Way Out Center" Revised 06/11/20 Business Case Justification: Homelessness in the Spokane Region is bigger than any one entity is able to address alone.The shelter system consists community-provided assistance to vulnerable individuals spanning from drop-in emergency overnight placement and warming centers, to life readiness locations, also called "bridge services",to supportive housing vouchers.The desire is for those, once homeless, to experience a life-long change to live independently within a community. This type of large scale impact may only be realized through a collection of closely aligned efforts,versus standalone initiatives, within a portfolio of projects aligned with regional strategic goals. Additionally, with the COVID-19 pandemic, new elements have been introduced to this project to ensure long-term provisioning and capacity for healthy sheltering, physical distancing and isolation capacity. At present, a gap exists in our shelter system for continuous stay options among homeless adults without children.The Bridge Housing model has been used for other population groups with verified, metric-based outcome successes'.This effort is the beginning of a larger initiative to construct effective,efficient, sustainable and accountable enhancements to our regional system intended to specially address: • Coordinated and consolidated fiscal resources aligned at the regional-level solutions (versus municipal bed count) • Establish public-private partnerships for funding • Alignment with the Regional 5 Year Strategic Plan for Homelessness submitted to the WA State Department of Commerce2 • Regional oversight with decision making and funding authority Shelter System Focus Warming Center Overnight Day Center Conitinious Stay Supportive Housing Healthy Sheltering Index Youth(up to 24 yrs) High Families Y4 ; Lpw Women Only Medium Adult(24yrs and older) Project Foals, Medium Project Manager: Ariane Schmidt, Regional Project Manager Project Team: Tim Sigler*, City of Spokane Community, Housing& Human Services(CHHS) Director Sponsors Tija Danzig*,City of Spokane CHHS Senior Manager Scott Rasmussen*, City of Spokane CHHS Housing Program Manager Tim Crowley*,Spokane County Housing and Community Development p"i"your' (CHSCD) Program Manager Aotta '"ma•°' Morgan Koudelka*, City of Spokane Valley Senior Administrative The SIb) 5t moorE i rta-My Kenneth Perine*,The Salvation Army of Spokane stakRhoidars Gary Redden*,The Salvation Army of Spokane Kristine Ruggles*,The Salvation Army of Spokane Aerial Anderson 1 i- https://my.spokaneclty,org/endinghomelessness/about/coc/ 2- Spokane City/County Continuum of Care 5-Year Strategic Plan to Prevent and End Homelessness{adopted December 20191 1 Regional Project Charter .5,�%hneCou�y � � �� Subject Matter Experts(SMEs): Kathleen Torella, CHSCD and BH-ASO Director David Lewis, City of Spokane HMIS Manager Megan Phillips*,Spokane Fire Marshall David Singley*,Captain Spokane Police Department Downtown Precinct Spokane Valley Fire Department(TBD) Dave Ellis*,Spokane Sheriffs Office/Spokane Valley Police Department Garcia, Luis*,City of Spokane Code Enforcement Alison Poulsen, Better Health Together Pam Tietz,Spokane Housing Authority and Spokane Continuum of Care Board Chair Mark Richards, Downtown Business Partnership (DSP) Tom Hormel,Spokane County HCDAC Advisory Board Member Rusty Barnett*, Community Member Consideration for additional lived experience representative(s) *Also on site selection recommendation committee. Project Objectives and Deliverables: Objectives: 1. Assess and recommend a Bridge Housing location options that meet the needs of the partner entities 2. Assess and recommend service options within the Bridge Housing Center 3, Assess estimated new(or shifted) capacity at drop-in emergency shelters 4. Document the needs of the partner entities in a regional system Deliverables include: 1. Purchase and site readiness 2. Construct of an Operating Proforma including Memorandums of Understanding (MOU) between partner entities for capital and operating contributions 3. Documentation and visual for the system continuum, including local, WA State and Federal touchpoints 4. Contract with Provider(s) 5. Center operational before the cold weather season of 2020 Project Scope(Boundaries): The center will operate for approximately sixty(60) individuals.The individuals will come to the center based on a referral basis.Ongoing case managed care, life readiness skill as well as living space will be included in the operational model. Individuals will stay at the center for approximately 30-90 days prior to moving on to supportive or independent housing. Project Assumptions and Risks: Assumptions: - A location will be selected, - Additional capacity at drop-in emergency shelters will be available to Individuals throughout Spokane County. - A sustainable funding model will rely on public, private partnerships 2 S;PC)i<:;.ti N I Regional Project Charter sp �«`roLit: �` SPtilirkaun Valley. nie - Funding will be tied to defines, outcome based metrics for accountability for contracted providers and local government entities - The strategies of this project will align with the five (5) years strategic plan for homelessness adopted by Spokane County, City of Spokane and Spokane Valley Risks: - An agreed upon location cannot be determined by stakeholders - Local Government partnerships do not materialize - Private partnerships do not materialize - Insufficient capital funding is allocated - Capacity allocation continues to be municipality"bed county" divine Project Budget: Capital 1. City of Spokane: $1.9M of City Community Development Block Grant(CDBG)funds under consideration by City Administration for this purpose. 2. Spokane County/Valley: $1.5M of Homeless Housing Assistance Act(HHAA)funds. HHAA funds were enacted in Washington State by Engrossed Second Substitute House Bill (FSSHB)2163 on August 1, 2005.The law created a document recording fee on certain documents to be utilized by local jurisdictions to reduce homelessness.Grant funds are administrated by the state and local governments.Current Spokane County methodology for consideration for HHAA funding is that after a Spokane County CSHCD RFP is released, applications are submitted to CSHCD for consideration by the HCDAC(represented by represent twelve(12) cities and towns within the Spokane Urban County Consortium)who will review all applications and recommend the selected application(s)to the Board of County Commissioners for their final decision making. For Spokane County Community Services Operating 1. City of Spokane$1.9M over five (5)years(Source: CDBG) 2. Spokane County(includes Spokane Valley) $1.9M over(5)years(Source: HHAA) 3. Avista Foundation partnerships$1.9M over five(5)years(Source: Private Funding) Project Timeline: •Locat€on •Pogressive *Site Readiness Selected • Design Build RFP •intake •Construction Requirements •Needed Ca � � t •Finalize and Capcility 2 ,n • Funding Secured Operating Nov 0 Shlfting for •Project Chaarter �114r Proforma • Emergency Authorized •Confirm Shelters �= �� •GRAFT Operating Outcome f� •Open for Cold Proforma Metrics Weather Season Additional Key Stakeholders: 3 cwasui SOOkane Regional Project Charter Spokane Comity Valley City of Spokane Council City of Spokane Valley City Council Avista Utilities Downtown Business Partnership Veterans Administration HUD Project Sponsor Approval: June 23, 2020 20 - 0 4 4 0 Josh Ke s, Spokane County ommi sioner District 2 Mary Kuney, Spo ne County Commission District 2 Al French, .okane Co f ty C+ • missi rJr r District 3 Nad ne oodward,City of Spokane Mayor Ben Wick, City of Spokane Valley Mayor Breean Beggs, City of Spokane Council President Latisha Hill, Avista Foundation Attest: Spokane City Clerk 'F SPo III II rr. Approved as to fon: Y ► Assistant City Att ney I N G ORDINANCE NO. C35908 An ordinance establishing official City policy relating to homelessness response efforts; enacting a new section 18.05.030 to the Spokane Municipal Code. WHEREAS, too many of our neighbors in Spokane are experiencing or have experienced homelessness; and WHEREAS, too often, and for a variety of reasons, historically the City's night by night sheltering policy responses were either insufficient or carried out with insufficient collaboration with the City Council and other regional governmental and nonprofit partners; and WHEREAS, historically the City has precipitously reduced shelter bed and warming center capacity below the demonstrated need, which displaced hundreds of people into the community to sleep on sidewalks, in doorways, in parks and along the Spokane River, none of which are equipped for such use. WHEREAS, the City Council has previously adopted resolutions concerning the procurement of warming centers or emergency shelter during inclement weather which state the official policy of the City, yet there is still a need for a binding statement of official City policy to guide the City's responses to the ongoing issue of homelessness and night by night sheltering in our community; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that it is necessary to establish clear and specific baseline policy statements to guide the City and to notify the public as to how the City will determine what steps it will take in the future in forming responses to the ongoing issue of homelessness and night by night shelters so that we can more effectively provide for the most vulnerable members of our community without gaps in service and protect neighborhoods that are ill-equipped to absorb the unsheltered. NOW THEREFORE, the City of Spokane does ordain: Section 1. That there is enacted a new section 18.05.030 of the Spokane Municipal Code to read as follows: Section 18.05.030 Homelessness Response Policy A. Findings and Purpose 1. The City finds that each resident of Spokane is entitled to a basic level of dignity and respect, regardless of whether they are housed or unhoused. 2. The City also finds that historically, City policy regarding the response to homelessness in our community needing night by night shelter has 1 SUBSTITUTE—6-22-2020 As substituted on 6-22-2020 been inconsistent and insufficiently transparent, collaborative, regional, or inclusive, and that process often resulted in harm to our community. 3. The purpose of this section is to set a baseline within the City's limits of providing night by night shelter as our City's minimum response to homelessness in our community as we collaborate with other jurisdictions and entities to create a regional solution that ends homelessness. B. It is the official policy of the City of Spokane that its responses to homelessness will be undertaken in accordance with the following principles, without exception. 1. In all responses, a region-wide approach is the starting point and all regional stakeholders — government, nonprofit, and for-profit sectors — will be involved in the formation of a regional response policy. 2. The City Council, as a body or through its members, as the Council determines, will be actively and directly involved in all aspects of the City's formation of policy with the advice and consultation with the Community, Housing and Human Services and Continuum of Care Boards along with City staff in response to homelessness in our community, without exception, especially in regards to the provision of night by night shelter. 3. All night by night sheltering for people experiencing homelessness in Spokane, and funded with dollars either originating with or passing through the City of Spokane, will be low- or no-barrier shelter, to implement the preferred approach of Housing First. 4. The City as a minimum standard within the City's limits shall not reduce night by night shelter or warming center capacity (whether measured by beds, square feet, locations, or by any other capacity measure) without first having in place an agreed, published, and publicly-disseminated plan which is compliant with the principles established in this section and which provides equivalent capacity or it is demonstrated that the amount of capacity being reduced is no longer needed based on vacant space for at least two weeks so there is no gap in service to people in our community who are experiencing homelessness and ill-equipped neighborhoods are not burdened with unsheltered persons. 5. It is the intent of the City to implement this ordinance without interfering with the implementation of any existing plans or funding commitments derived from federal and state grants traditionally made pursuant to the Community, Housing and Human Services and Continuum of Care Boards. 2 SUBSTITUTE—6-22-2020 As substituted on 6-22-2020 PASSED by the City Council on Council President Attest: Approved as to form: City Clerk Assistant City Attorney Mayor Date Effective Date 3 SUBSTITUTE—6-22-2020 As substituted on 6-22-2020 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: September 22, 2020 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑consent ❑old business ❑new business ❑public hearing ❑information ®admin.report ❑pending legislation ❑executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: 2021 State Legislative Agenda. GOVERNING LEGISLATION: Not applicable. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: This is the first of three planned discussions with Council prior to adoption. BACKGROUND: This is an opportunity for Council to discuss potential items for the 2021 State Legislative Agenda(Agenda). Our anticipated development calendar is as follows: - September 22,2020 -Administrative report and Council discussion(first touch); -October 13,2020-Administrative report and Council discussion(second touch); -November 17,2020- Council motion to formally approve the 2021 State Legislative Agenda; -December 2020-Council meets with 4th District Legislative delegation to discuss 2021 State Legislative Agenda; and -January 2021 —Legislative session begins. Staff is also attaching the final approved 2020 State Legislative Agenda for reference. Over the years,the adopted Agenda has become long,covering a broad range of issues. As the City adopted the 2020 Federal Legislative Agenda, staff and Council agreed that shorter was likely better,which would allow the City to focus on those items most critical to the City in its contacts with the delegation. It has become clear in meetings with state legislators over the past few years that we don't have time to address many of the issues contained in the adopted agenda in those discussions. As such,they don't get discussed for the most part. In an effort to determine which Agenda items Council would like to carry over from last year,we will start with a draft 2021 Agenda that only includes the Bridging the Valley/Pines GSP, along with a proposed capital request for partial funding for the Fairgrounds project,and requesting additional tools for economic development. During the meeting, staff will look to Council comments as to whether any particular items should be added back in for the second touch. OPTIONS: For discussion only. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: No action is requested this evening. Staff will return with a second administrative report on this topic on October 13, 2020 with a tentative schedule for Council adoption of the 2020 State Legislative Agenda on November 17,2020. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS:Not applicable. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Calhoun, City Manager; John Hohman, Deputy City Manager; Cary Driskell, City Attorney. ATTACHMENTS: -Draft 2021 State Legislative Agenda; -Adopted version of 2020 State Legislative Agenda; and -PowerPoint presentation on draft 2021 State Legislative Agenda. DRAFT Spok CITY Of ane Valley 10210 E Sprague Avenue • Spokane Valley WA 99206 Phone: (509)720-5000 •Fax: (509)720-5075 •www.spokanevalley.org 2021 Legislative Agenda -Adopted by Council November 17,2020 Transportation Funding Request: Bridging the Valley Bridging the Valley is a project to separate vehicle traffic from train traffic in the 42-mile corridor from Athol, Idaho through Spokane to promote economic growth, traffic movement, and safety. The project calls for replacing three at-grade crossings in the City of Spokane Valley at Barker Road, Pines Road, and Sullivan Road. With state and federal assistance, the Barker Road Grade Separation Project is fully funded, and construction is programmed for 2021. The City is now focused on delivering the Pines Road Grade Separation Project: Pines Road Grade Separation Project The City respectfully requests that the State allocate $19.3 million to construct the Pines Road Grade Separation project. Pines Road is one of the region's key transportation corridors, carrying residential, commercial, and industrial traffic from Trent Avenue (SR 290) across the Spokane River to I-90. On average, 60 trains travel through the Pines at-grade crossing each day,blocking traffic movements for nearly four hours, causing significant delays for residents and freight movement. The mainline track in this area is currently being expanded, which will increase the number of trains to over 100 per day by 2040. In 2018,the Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board(FMSIB)rated this at-grade crossing as the highest ranked unfunded Tier 1 rail crossing in the State out of 4,171 at-grade crossings based upon freight mobility and safety. The project will also improve the intersection of two state highways,Pines Road(SR 27)and Trent Avenue(SR 290).Approximately 35,000 vehicles pass through this intersection, 12%of which are trucks. Pines Road is also the primary access to almost 230 acres of undeveloped mixed-use, commercial and industrial land. Over the next 25 years, this project will generate $101.9 million in state general fund taxes and will support 8,700 new jobs. Total project cost is estimated at$29 million.Thus far,the City has secured$9.7 million,including $4.7 million in City funds, $3.8 million in federal funds from the regional metropolitan planning organization (MPO), and $1.25 million from the Federal Railroad Administration. With these funds,project design and right-of-way acquisition are underway. The project will be shovel ready in 2022.The State has not yet contributed toward this project,despite it including improvements at the intersection of two State highways. The City requests $19.3 million to construct this ready-to- go project. Fairgrounds Exhibition Center The City of Spokane Valley requests $3 million to construct an Exhibition Center at the Spokane County Fairgrounds, located in the City of Spokane Valley, to spur the local tourism economy. The Exhibition Center would increase the capacity of the Fairgrounds to host regional events, and capitalize on existing visitors to the Fairgrounds and Avista Stadium. The building would include space for a restaurant with indoor and outdoor seating options.This would provide additional opportunities for destination visits to the site while providing a convenient space for existing patrons to extend their visit. This space could also be used in a variety of ways in future public health or emergency crises from administering tests or inoculations, to storing and distributing personal protective equipment. The centralized location in the region provides convenient access for most of the residents in Spokane County. In 2015,the City of Spokane Valley initiated studies of the retail and tourism aspects of the local economy. The studies showed that improvements should be made to support underperforming segments of the tourism Page 1 of 2 economy, including food and drink services, accommodations, and tourism venues. The City, in conjunction with a diverse group of stakeholders, developed a list of ten potential projects to increase tourism spending within the City. Subsequent meetings with the City Council narrowed the focus of the alternatives to just a few over the intervening years.A new 30,000 square foot exhibit/entry building at the Fairgrounds displayed the highest economic benefit of all the alternatives studied. The building is estimated to cost$10 million.The City has approximately$3 million in lodging tax money set aside. Spokane County would own,maintain, and operate the new facility. Economic Development Tools The City of Spokane Valley supports legislative efforts to adopt and enhance statutory mechanisms and state programs that encourage economic development, including border communities that experience the loss of sales to other communities in neighboring states. As such, we encourage the Legislature to adopt mechanisms that promote increased economic development within our communities, including local increment financing tools like those that exist in other states. The City supports AWC legislative agenda items that serve the best interests of Spokane Valley. DRAFT Page 2 of 2 CIl`Y' Spokane Valley 10210 E Sprague Avenue • Spokane Valley WA 99206 Phone: (509)720-5000 •Fax: (509)720-5075 •www.spokanevalley.org 2020 Legislative Agenda -Adopted by Council November 19,2019 Transportation Funding Request: Bridging the Valley The City continues to make headway on the multi-phase Bridging the Valley project to replace three at-grade crossings that bisect north/south commerce in the City. With the State's assistance on the Phase 1 Barker Road Grade Separation Project in the 2017-2019 budget,the City is making significant progress to improve the safety and economic competitiveness of our community. The City successfully secured the only 2017 federal TIGER grant in the State, and those grant funds were applied to the Barker Road Grade Separation Project.This project is fully funded,engineering design and right-of-way acquisition is underway, and construction is programmed for 2020. Phase 2:Pines Road/BNSF Grade Separation Project The City respectfully requests that the State make an investment in the safety of the Spokane Valley region through the Bridging the Valley project by allocating an additional$7.8 million to the Pines Road/BNSF Grade Separation project. Pines Road is one of the region's key transportation corridors, carrying both private and commercial/industrial traffic from Trent Avenue (SR 290) across the Spokane River to I-90 and commercial areas south of the I-90 freeway. In 2018, the Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board (FMSIB) rated this at-grade crossing as the highest ranked unfunded Tier 1 rail crossing in the State out of 4,171 at-grade crossings based upon freight mobility and safety. The project will also improve the intersection of two state highways, Pines Road (SR 27)and Trent Avenue (SR 290). On average,60 trains travel through the Pines/BNSF crossing each day,blocking traffic movements for nearly 3.5 hours. Vehicle delay is expected to increase with the addition of a second mainline BNSF track at Pines Road in 2020. In addition, about 34,000 vehicles pass through the adjacent Pines/Trent intersection, including freight from Canada and northern Idaho. The average daily traffic volume on Pines Road is more than double the vehicles of the funded Barker Road project. Pines Road is also the primary access to almost 230 acres of undeveloped mixed-use, commercial and industrial land. Total project cost is estimated at $29 million, and the City has thus far secured $7.8 million, including $4.7 million in City funds, $1.9 million from our regional metropolitan planning organization (MPO) and a $1.25 million CRISI grant. We have yet to receive any State contributions toward improving this intersection of two State highways, and request $7.8 million of State dollars that could be inclusive of TIB,FMSIB or a direct legislative appropriation. With this State commitment we believe we can be successful obtaining the balance of the project through Federal sources. 1-90 Barker-to-Harvard Project Cost Overruns The City of Spokane Valley supports WSDOT in its continuing efforts to achieve state and local transportation purposes,including connectivity and safety. In doing so,the City seeks to continue advocating its position that WSDOT projects need to remain the financial responsibility of the State of Washington. Projects by local agencies generally have a beneficial effect on regional and state facilities as well, and state and regional projects generally have a beneficial effect on the local transportation network. However, this does not imply that a financial responsibility should exist between the agencies since there is no policy or operational control of another agency's project absent an agreement to do so. For example,the City supports its neighboring jurisdiction,the City of Liberty Lake,in supporting budget proviso language stating that WSDOT is responsible for any cost overruns on the Harvard to Barker project, except for those components of the project within the City of Liberty Lake. The City of Liberty Lake has agreed to fund any cost overruns on the components of the project located within its boundaries. Capital Project Request—Sullivan Park Water Line The City of Spokane Valley respectfully requests that the Legislature allocate $413,000 from the Capital Budget to pay for installation of a water line to Sullivan Park. The City owns property adjacent to the Spokane River that it uses as Sullivan Park. The City is purchasing approximately 14 additional acres from the Washington State Department of Transportation to expand the park. Both parcels sit in an area unserved by a water district,and which require installation of a water line by Trentwood Irrigation District under the Union Pacific rail line. Trentwood's engineering estimate for the project is $413,000. Sullivan Park is currently served by an underperforming well that will be insufficient to service the expanded park. Economic Development Tools The City of Spokane Valley supports legislative efforts to adopt and enhance statutory mechanisms and state programs that encourage economic development, including border communities that experience the loss of sales to other communities in neighboring states. As such, we encourage the Legislature to adopt mechanisms that promote increased economic development within our communities, including increasing funding to the Public Works Assistance Account,expanding the Rural County Sales&Use Tax Credit for Public Facilities to border counties,and reinvesting in the Local Revitalization Program. Defend Local Control The City of Spokane Valley incorporated in 2003 as a direct result of the desire of our citizens to have substantial local control of decision-making. A foundational belief for the Council and the citizens they represent is that the most effective level of government is the one closest to the people, which is the city form of government. As such,the Council urges the Legislature to respect local decision-making wherever appropriate,and not infringe into those areas that have traditionally been regulated by elected City officials. Examples of appropriate local decision-making include the determination of whether to allow recreational marijuana home growing, and local control regarding zoning density, including flexibility relating to accessory dwelling units. Protect and Restore Local State-Shared Revenues The City requests that the Legislature protect and restore local state-shared revenues. These funds include the Liquor Excise Tax Account ($487,739 in 2018), Liquor Board Profits ($786,251 in 2018),Municipal Criminal Justice Assistance Account ($567,445 in 2018), City-County Assistance Account ($27,311 in 2018)and Marijuana Revenues($259,242 in 2018). Specifically,the City supports legislation that removes the 2011 cap on Liquor Profit revenues to restore the historical 50/50 revenue sharing relationship between the State and local governments. Protect Businesses by Reforming State Regulatory Burden The City strongly supports businesses small and large,in our City and across the state,because they are the lifeblood of our economy.Unfortunately, these businesses are forced to compete in a state regulatory environment that is increasingly burdensome,making it difficult to compete with businesses in neighboring states. Of most urgent concern is the regressive state business & occupation tax, as well as reforming the Department of Children,Youth and Families oversight program. The City supports rebalancing the state- wide regulatory framework to encourage and support business development and retention. The City supports AWC legislative agenda items that serve the best interests of Spokane Valley. State Legislative Agenda Potential Project September 22, 2020 Mark Calhoun, City Manager John Hohman, Deputy City Manager Cary Driskell, City Attorney S iO1tane p Valley® Y Fairgrounds/Stadium District Proposal appears to fit state capital project criteria Increase market share in event hosting Need for renovation/innovation at existing facility Capitalize on existing visitors to the Fair and Expo Center and Stadium Capture existing demand in winter Can be used as a regional distribution/testing/inoculation facility for future public health needs Fairgrounds/Stadium District VicinityMap . , r.. , (§Me@taDin Plante'sL- / _i t � Trentwood r`., LQ G r�1io Sports in I1T spok _ �— H _ t" ane River it r __ L - _1 1 �F It fir' / ft �> II I,... C� G,9A [ Millwood it I �',.� �` Ili. �Centerplacekiii as of s_ [Ayyppva� '_ N // *0" E MIssl i:37,C. Aalik-)- ' ' ,� ` _ I,p ligl 1uuu . -) 1_ r, i ' _ �Fairgrounds t I1 r ' I!641 �f"Spokane ,- r3r- , Piti J FtUItO _ V511ey..• t ity � O Rai *I` City city Hall w E B,h-Ave. Erna- x - -cam- . r Rill --Is Ix - v �- � shmma'�n H Hills- 1 © ��� II L� `r-ro■ v . A ,tlNat.ral I- it; �1 �=1 �1 — r . . . to\-\-- .-Ly. ...m‘v I •1,> " , Olt _E.J2 nJ;Are- -- - —_. EJ1n_d.Arre--. I 1S I l�,Dislinr ar MI IsY• S -�� I• Conse palm j` _0 (il I g A.ea-North , % ..� k S t�7• �.® i ^ Unit \ l r ' - Fairgrounds/Stadium District - Details 30,000 sf addition/new structure One concept connects to existing fairgrounds structures, the other is separated from existing structures Architect analyzed many alternatives and potential locations within the site $10 million estimated cost - ideal cost sharing scenario $3 million state capital request Balance would be City lodging tax money with a possible Spokane County contribution that has yet to be negotiated Spokane County would maintain and operate the new facility Fairgrounds/Stadium District - Details , ,,.., .__ ,,, ,... ,„- - 4. 7''''t-1'r!-,4:m1-4:i.1., o 4.1,f,''':'',r't r. ' o'di-f.'r t=*-i="1?'" #^ 4 t , _ - �_ ��- _ /`' /Et ^tom _ ri ... 1 � Liz= P - 1 ni.lto si_. 1.-- - sl q Node •— a id A ler. " - `� " r- I ' 41''' ri+tt,t 4 .— f Fr,r it' OP t f - - - 1 , - mot'f a 4.::::�. I , F J - t'Y/i Views In S• Pedestrian Connection s e s �o� NODE OPTION - CONNECTIVITY Fairgrounds/stadium District _ Details ..... , .._.Q ....._., , . , .,, Tr:-, S " -- IS- i-,- '. ... .,,, .d.,.., ... .r--- .. \ .., ..1-'-- Connected .1 .1.1 D ...' fa ....,_v_.---. ... .. . 16'44, --'- v ".. •-• ....„• -.--q,lit -:-f ,,;4• I ,-;.:, -- \‘..70% • .;'''' ' * ' . ,k, , ; ",,,;i t• , * •-t. % 4 : ...,40 71)1111V1,i, b ,,'- 41 • i j *." --:*" \Or-- IN'--7:-_--V11,4114-'';'. 1, . _.. ° ; ''''••• . ' '• I ' _ '.4.1;• :714.• . ; ';;. - "4,.... -1.--','"-"geli.:4450;'"ilk.; 44 '-'1, ',1 J'' - Ip. %-, IlL4 7 . . . -. ....,_ - 10...,,,-.. ri,..'-mins....._ . ,' - II .,-,1 lb, ______ ' III , t- Ilir - , 1, ,,-,44-- ._ rigiallinlb . -"".IIIIIIIIIr -. • ---,--, - ) -_-___ 'LI: 1*--1-717.1 . 1 _1 ' -- - - -II 4,j^..-14.7771,,, 7 .... - 1.-'--- !.!.., :., . -,. , - __,- . .... . . , . . ..., -1 . ... -• -.. t I.4 i 11W44ii . . ... .. '" '' ,... .,- - .... .1*, ... 1 -- I° •*:, - • ! !. . 4"' , - - -, , : . .. . - . ,. Fairgrounds/Stadium District - Connected k ! • - - , • SPOKANE COUNTY —• ■Iimmommmomimm t 67 FHI iA y Fairgrounds/Stadium District - Connected ----- ,‘ _.„ ■ w -41 _ 8 Fairgrounds/Stadium District - Connected 4* 04 -a- 111111P1611.11W _--..056...0' - -- , ___ --- . 4._. . ......... #0. .. # # n...11111111111111 / .....0.."' mu Ilib, fttli o 11111ft /, ,#1 ',Iir. .01111 4 op,. -----:----------- -"NI ftliy% 011°‘ ..117-....:-•4"; Fairgrounds/Stadium Di st r i ct - Connected jitimi , ___________ - 1-0, 1 . . .1 MIEIMIMINEIMMIIIMME om� iill�l MI Fairgrounds/stadium District _ Details , ._..., 9, • .,--- ---,..-5 -,-:::: .!.---' ? -:-.:--__ -, , . ......'"' '::::-. 7,---''.12 ' ..f",--- 7,!.......:- '•... . . -1 ,---7,--,,,."-,,,.,,,.....,j ...-7.7-.-,-;74 4:4 4-7,4 . - _ .:,..:, . , 4;-- Separated ,., -v-:- .1",.. "--,-,•':'' .....- P .A P. irlii. .'i ...":4. ti .,- — -' ,-.,,04$ . ,.,‘„„, ,, A.,,..,t\ -...-.. ,g. oi. 4-14 :rot . ..-- . ' -I - -------•ft,N ---. -,....„,•:.;%.,- ,&• -1,4 .--, ' ,, .--0 - i ‘-' ,,,"*..„.4::3.-i:-. . ------ er . - . - I 1 -., • 1'.41 , ' -rI a,u. _ , -;"J•L'-'. f r .. = = = = , .-.. _L. ...1,1ii; ,, lig ' :• . . :L ., - -uk -ILE . I—I. -.-'Z:=-7.•':.1' ' :-' . • - . • , — —!.."..---.--.rr--- it, a.-- , IL _ 0 —H..I1=! r . . . - •I .! Gm- r3- -I h- ,.... ..._ . , 11 .... _ — — , .-J-: 7,,..,':-.L.,' t-,-;;;,.-'' . .7. :- • 1..1 ,,,9„--- _ --, .1 -- Ur;7.7r :r.r-r•Jr. 1. 41 ,. . ., . , . i'i'i,.:. - .-" .. - • l ... _ - 1 I,A A III3311 .,. . ..• .._ .,_ :.,. . •. ...,,__. ...._ ._ . .. ... ., .,_. ,..__ . ,. F • • - , 4 •...= . ..., . _ _ II. -' .. .... ... 11 .. . .. —_ - 4 1 4- - . .. , •g.,;, .. .. Fairgrounds/Stadium District - Separated ER ... . ! 1r GAL'.P�"�z. __. .. rr � lu.- I� k� I ' " �r p,"x' I- ill l ;, _ „; All 1 1 6 1 -- • • 12 Fairgrounds/Stadium District - Se arated p I , rinig' r 4 ...- ""44► . 1 1 1 I , i 5 �- - FAIR AND- EX NNE h ) Z.". t.,:r.,--® _ P - - . a 1 111111.11. 13 Fairgrounds/Stadium District - Separated__I..., iiiolli . . --1. — __ __��_� I eaF—ter_ —^rNERim iiimit . _ _ . ,. _ -z- . JAI,' ,16-.1 ' -- wr r r ` ,ii III 7 � 14 Fairgrounds/Stadium District - Separated fir. _ '{ it _ _ • 15 Fairgrounds - Financial Analysis Total Attendance Days Low I Baseline I I High Visitors _ Total Visitors _ _ 28,000 57,600 86,400 Estimated Hotel Room Nights 8,300 Capital Costs _ Mid-Range Capital Costs _ $ 10,000,000 $ 10,000,000 $ 10,000,000 Less: _ Preliminary Fund #104 @ 12/31/19 (3) $ (2,690,945) $ (2,690,945) $ (2,690,945) Remaining capital cost to finance $ 7,309,055 $ 7,309,055 $ 7,309,055 LTGO bond payment $ 457,688 $ 457,688 $ 457,688 - 30-year bond @ 4.5%, issue costs @ 2% - 1.3% lodging tax may provide up to $213,000 annually for the payment (1) Values for number of visitors, capital costs, operating revenues, operating expenses, estimated visitor spending in the City, and number of jobs created was taken directly from the CAI report pg. 61. However, the capital cost has been increased due to estimated inflation. (2) Not calculated. (3) December 31, 2019 fund balance is preliminary and unaudited as of May 26, 2020. Fairgrounds - Financial Analysis, continued Total Attendance Days Low I Baseline I I High Analysis of Annual Activity Annual cash inflows - Operating revenues ' $ 230,400 $ 460,800 $ 691,200 - 1.3% COSV lodging tax $ 213,000 $ 213,000 $ 213,000 - Estimated increase in sales tax collections $ 16,779 $ 33,558 $ 50,320 $ 460,179 $ 707,358 $ 954,520 Annual cash outflows - Operating expenses $ 445,000 $ 445,000 $ 445,000 - Bond payment $ 457,688 $ 457,688 $ 457,688 $ 902,688 $ 902,688 $ 902,688 Annual net cash inflow(outflow) $ (442,509) $ (195,330) $ 51,832 Analysis of Other Economic Impacts Estimated visitor spending in the City $ 1,974,000 $ 3,948,000 $ 5,920,000 - Corresponding increase in sales tax $ 16,779 $ 33,558 $ 50,320 Values for number of visitors, capital costs, operating revenues, operating expenses, estimated visitor spending in the City, and number of jobs created was taken directly from the CAI report pg. 61. However, the capital cost has been increased due to estimated inflation. Questions? _______ ____::::--,4„----------40. ___________ ,r: --ii � [ �X o CENTER II I. � ! I -_, ' ' ' ,BAN r II ill I "' I' . .-,-' , . . . . .,.,... , , L.I'll,W"::.111.1. r"11:7_0_1 _ ..=. :,,;,_ Fitt4 : L ii,....4.! „_ .. , ill. . __ ,:i_& +ram i 1.,, ,,i i.:.1,,..14141 ?t',...W'- i:P , U11 1- -_ - xai 1 :� CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: September 22,2020 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑consent ❑old business ❑new business ❑public hearing ❑information ®admin.report ❑pending legislation ❑executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Administrative report — update on property acquisition of Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT)Flora Road property. GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 35A.11.020; SVMC 3.49.010. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN:November 12,2019 approval of 2019 Spokane Valley Parks and Recreation Master Plan Update; February 11, 2020 winter workshop discussion on Recreation Conservation Office (RCO) grant opportunities; February 25, 2020 administrative report on potential purchase; administrative report (scheduled as a motion, which was later withdrawn) March 17, 2020; administrative report March 31, 2020; April 7, 2020 Resolution#20-006 seeking Council authorization to apply for an RCO grant,the proceeds of which would partially offset the cost of the acquisition(action on resolution was deferred until a later date),April 28,2020 Resolution#20-008 seeking Council authorization to apply for an RCO grant,the proceeds of which would partially offset the cost of the acquisition;May 26, 2020 administrative report regarding WSDOT willingness to delay the sale. BACKGROUND: The City has been negotiating with the WSDOT for the acquisition of 45.73 acres east of Flora Road, immediately north of the Spokane River. The property would be used for park purposes. The purchase price is $2,091,600, which was established by appraisal. A small section of the easterly portion of the property abuts the Spokane River, with the rest of the property having a 225 foot strip of property belonging to Washington State Parks between the Spokane River and the property to be purchased. A map is attached for further reference. The property is largely in a natural state,with extensive coniferous trees along the westerly and southerly boundaries. The City applied for a grant from the Washington State Recreation and Conservation Office for up to one million dollars to offset part of the purchase price. The technical review presentation was earlier today,and the City will not find out for a while whether we were successful. The Council voted on March 17, 2020 to remove the motion consideration for the purchase due to significant concerns and questions regarding the unknown impact on the City finances from the coronavirus pandemic. Since that time, staff have continued to carefully review revenue receipt information and are currently recommending a future 2020 Budget amendment to reduce a variety of revenues downward, including a sales tax reduction of 10%with slight increases estimated in 2021. Staff again checked with WSDOT representatives on September 8 to see if anything has changed with regard to their urgency to sell the property. We are now approximately six months out from when the City put the purchase on hold, which is the original timeframe requested of WSDOT. The City's contact has advised that there is nothing imminent from WSDOT's standpoint at this time,and we will continue to stay in touch if anything looks like it may change. We agreed to check back in mid-December to be able to report an update to Council by the end of 2020. OPTIONS: Discussion only. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Discussion only. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: $2,091,600 plus associated costs such as title insurance. Potential sources of funds to facilitate the acquisition could be comprised of the following: •$200,000 from Park Capital Projects Fund#309 reserves that are currently unobligated; •$500,000 from Capital Reserve Fund#312 that has been earmarked for park land acquisition; •$281,209 from Capital Reserve Fund#312 that is currently unallocated; and • $1,110,394 (plus any costs associated with closing) from either: General Fund reserves,or Reallocating money in Capital Reserve Fund#312 that is currently earmarked for other projects but not yet committed. The only viable earmark staff has been able to identify in this category is money set aside for future Balfour Park improvements. If$1,110,394 of the current$1,985,000 earmark was reallocated to the WSDOT Flora acquisition,this would leave $874,606 still earmarked for Balfour Park. •Potentially up to $1,000,000 from an RCO grant. Acquisition of this property is not currently included as an appropriation in either the 2020 or 2021 Budgets. If the acquisition were made in 2020 this would necessitate a budget amendment. STAFF CONTACT: Cary Driskell,City Attorney;Mike Stone,Parks and Recreation Director. ATTACHMENTS: Overhead map of the site. III I1 ( rF.�rr� ' ,� .... -r� ,; , I _ . . - -- rn m +i� r � __6� L ami d▪ ,, r a >_ i,bT?_ y _ • _ _ i . ,, g... Q_ L _ _ ti s"- ▪,t 1"IlV7f co, 8 �� - _irri.f s : r Gm t .,,'IE IndustrialIN {I � 1 ,, t t- .b 3 z E3 -.. : I ( • r r „ w. � c, ye`i f. .a' �: 9 E Fairview Ln _ ' ^+, E Eucltd - 1 - ii AC'. i:. om '� d Tr'_ ,. r y _. ♦� •.�.. ��`✓ �' t ' ��,,. E.Fairwew 3 1 s- ,nab'" , 9 d Q( 9.'a ri a i a. t ii l�il(� � 4� i � C , yx p( et 2 Viiiiir ;. ' ';''' ' pI ,f 1.t,,-l , r t. ' y' -r- '� G4�•"`C, r +±b� P; z �a Ave '� �� F, �d� F " .Matte » rt t1C '� /ro r- x, aa ,,,c,.'''.'_ ems § , + s� J t,. , p� .... r 1,. $ .. - #* .,.a` v �" .'�a' `" -,r''". - 2 •, f. E Manetta-Ln ;p� '$ ..t� ..,,a„,.;-,^" P e,(' t-I..... e$ m ' mAF'r`•. _ Y wx w y ',^` _ 4.„ y yy „i"�, r. �► l 3 .»• ,+a2* L 1 .r�-ir+�v`� „s„y'�" ':,� Yq� ,�. y f ,.. .'q v m 15'' `;,.aS i�„',+, I„h ao -'' . u O J: % m, ♦;- ;max -� + 'a' .rlP" ,,4 i$ J ..,;;� m . ' N,,..,,,,„,„... - , 3 m IT"l,�t' ,: qa�:.', ,r ♦ L ..,�"q--r�.IY'-:r t 1.-a y�+�1,,,,,' . k..,, '',.,I S _ ,ac,n.E ntgomery e ° ` �. e p air r 3 r t Efi r r� JIF rv " nsfi M _„,':„Lek, ♦ zv a � 9 - a � ,� 9Jr • v ♦ r N� s �� '� - � y - _ �t „}� on Ave 1 . b, t ',� . -x, IF �,. 'j_ ,:_M - i" nan ,..ie..a1 �� j/ s ERiverwa 1; l ,,; � F7t.. r E-Knox Aver �� Eli P EMichielli e: � -u k d. r �; � '.- �k:, t r�� GC�'Ii C�IIL�D - "-'-rcr y ix1- f-1�.,-I e .. :r ,.Ave o- :� i 0 ,,. --- kx"'''.__ irt +�.' r cJ - m 4Q EIndiana Ave -p 5e L` 'za r« c ?F♦r_r�F to A g I r�` ,,. - y� _'�y r'rr`r. ,r+n�T .r iy, r. E . 'r ;,,,r, " - b +; •�• _dExBaldwm Ave a., ' _ o _ Allan rt i 7. r g e - Legend E .♦ ''iqx. -._ f t Av -- QGLY�EII V. Ce .- ;P' E ' k :-__ F° a An©st `' Q OT Property t' g� Ra �� �1 .° WSD I _ � � b ' q 4',4 . Parcels r /yam N r E ocQ Y 2 •-. - --S• .-. 0 250 500 100 Feet t k si;' s rvxKF e. t ,y�4�3j., a �� a 14 t ml r . e DRAFT ADVANCE AGENDA as of September 17,2020; 8:30 a.m. Please note this is a work in progress;items are tentative To: Council& Staff From: City Clerk,by direction of City Manager Re: Draft Schedule for Upcoming Council Meetings Sept 29,2020,Study Session,6:00 p.m. [due Tue Sept 221 ACTION ITEM: 1.Motion Consideration: CARES Act Funding—Erik Lamb (10 minutes) NON-ACTION ITEMS: 2. Street Vacation 2020-0001 —Connor Lange (10 minutes) 3. Proposed Ordinance Adopting 2021 Property Taxes—Chelsie Taylor (10 minutes) 4. Proposed Code Amendments to Cable Franchises—J.Pietro,M.Koudelka,C. Driskell (20 minutes) 5. Stormwater Surplus—Connor Lang,Carly Johnson (10 minutes) 6. Tourism Promotion Act—Cary Driskell (10 minutes) 7.Advance Agenda—Mayor Wick (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting: 75 mins] Oct 6,2020, Study Session,6:00 p.m. [due Tue Sept 291 Proclamation: Fire Prevention Week ACTION ITEMS: 1.First Reading Ordinance 20-012 Cable Franchise Amendment—Cary Driskell (10 minutes) NON-ACTION ITEMS: 2. Cable Franchise TBS—Cary Driskell (10 minutes) 3. Infra Grant Debrief—Adam Jackson (15 minutes) 4. Pavement Preservation Surface Treatment—Adam Jackson (15 minutes) 5.Advance Agenda—Mayor Wick (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting: 55 mins] Oct 13,2020,Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Tue Oct 61 1. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 2. Second Reading Ordinance 20-012 Cable Franchise Amendment—Cary Driskell (15 minutes) 3.First Reading Ordinance 20-013 Nonconforming Use CTA 2020-0003—L.Barlow (15 minutes) 4.Admin Report: 2021 State Legislative Agenda—C. Driskell,J.Hohman,M. Calhoun (15 minutes) 5.Admin Report: City Manager Presents 2021 Preliminary Budget—Mark Calhoun (60 minutes) 6.Admin Report: Advance Agenda—Mayor Wick (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting: 115 mins] Oct 20,2020, Study Session,6:00 p.m. [due Tue Oct 131 ACTION ITEMS: 1.Motion Consideration: Awards to Outside Agencies—Chelsie Taylor (20 minutes) NON-ACTION ITEMS: 2.Advance Agenda—Mayor Wick (5 minutes) Oct 27,2020,Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Tue Oct 201 1. Public Hearing#2—2021 Budget—Chelsie Taylor (15 minutes) 2. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 3. Second Reading Ordinance 20-013 Nonconforming Use CTA 2020-0003—Lori Barlow (15 mins) 4.First Reading Property Tax Ordinance—Chelsie Taylor (10 minutes) 5.Admin Report: 2020 Budget Amendment—Chelsie Taylor (10 minutes) 6.Admin Report: Advance Agenda—Mayor Wick (5 minutes) 7. Info Only: Department Monthly Reports [*estimated meeting: 60 mins] Nov 3,2020, Study Session,6:00 p.m. 1due Tue Oct 271 1.Advance Agenda—Mayor Wick (5 minutes) Draft Advance Agenda 9/17/2020 3:40:21 PM Page 1 of 2 Nov 10,2020,Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Tue Nov 31 1. Public Hearing: 2020 Budget Amendment—Chelsie Taylor (10 minutes) 2. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 3. Second Reading Property Tax Ordinance—Chelsie Taylor (10 minutes) 4.First Reading Ordinance 2020 Budget Amendment—Chelsie Taylor (10 minutes) 5.First Reading Ordinance Adopting 2021 Budget—Chelsie Taylor (10 minutes) 6.Admin Report: Advance Agenda—Mayor Wick (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting: 50 mins] Nov 17,2020,Study Session,6:00 p.m. [due Tue Nov 101 ACTION ITEMS 1.Motion Consideration: Approval of'21 St. Legislative Agenda—C.Driskell,J.Hohman,M. Calhoun(5 min) 2.Advance Agenda—Mayor Wick (5 minutes) Nov 24,2020,Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Tue Nov 101 1. Public Hearing#3—2021 Budget—Chelsie Taylor (10 minutes) 2. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 3. Second Reading Ordinance 2020 Budget Amendment—Chelsie Taylor (10 minutes) 4. Second Reading Ordinance Adopting 2021 Budget—Chelsie Taylor (10 minutes) 5.Admin Report: LTAC Recommendations to Council—Chelsie Taylor (15 minutes) 6.Admin Report: 2021 Fee Resolution—Chelsie Taylor (15 minutes) 7.Admin Report: Advance Agenda—Mayor Wick (5 minutes) 8. Info Only: Department Monthly Reports [*estimated meeting: 70 mins] Dec 1,2020,Study Session, 6:00 p.m. - Cancelled due to Thanksgiving Holiday December 8,2020,Regular Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Tue Dec 1] 1. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 2. Resolution for 2021 Fees (if changes are needed)—Chelsie Taylor (10 minutes) 3.Motion Consideration: Award Lodging Tax for 2021 —Chelsie Taylor (15 minutes) 4.Admin Report: Tourism Venues—John Hohman (15 minutes) 5.Admin Report: Advance Agenda—Mayor Wick (5 minutes) Dec 15,2020, Study Session,6:00 p.m. [due Tue Dec 81 1.Advance Agenda—Mayor Wick (5 minutes) December 22,2020,Regular Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Tue Dec 15] 1. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 2.Admin Report: Advance Agenda—Mayor Wick (5 minutes) Dec 29,2020, Study Session,6:00 p.m. [due Tue Dec 221 1.Advance Agenda—Mayor Wick (5 minutes) 2. Info Only: Department Monthly Reports *time for public or Council comments not included OTHER PENDING AND/OR UPCOMING ISSUES/MEETINGS: Appleway Trail Amenities PFD Presentation Arts Council Sculpture Presentations SPEC Report/Update Artwork&Metal Boxes STA(2021) Core Beliefs Resolution St.Illumination(owners,cost,location) Donation Recognition St. O&M Pavement Preservation Fee Resolution Cost of Service Analysis TPA Interlocal Agreement Flashing Beacons/School Signage Trunk or Treat Health District Stats Vehicle Wgt Infrastructure Impact Mirabeau Park Forestry Mgmt. Water Districts&Green Space Naming City Facilities Protocol Way Finding Signs Park Lighting Draft Advance Agenda 9/17/2020 3:40:21 PM Page 2 of 2 City of Spokane Valley Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 01/01/2020 - 08/31/2020 Page Title 1 Cover Sheet 2 Pre-Application Meetings Requested 3 Online Applications Received 4 Construction Applications Received 5 Land Use Applications Received 6 Construction Permits Issued 7 Land Use Applications Approved 8 Development Inspections Performed 9 Code Enforcement 10 Revenue 11 Building Permit Valuations Printed 09/14/2020 10:22 Page 1 of 11 Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 01/01/2020 - 08/31/2020 Pre-Application Meetings Requested A Pre-Application Meeting is a service provided to help our customers identify the code requirements related to their project proposal. Community& Public Works Department scheduled a total of 5 Pre-Application Meetings in August 2020. 30 20 10 W 'ICI OL1 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Land Use Pre-Application Commercial Pre-App Meeting Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Commercial Pre-App 6 10 11 5 2 6 2 2 0 0 0 0 Land Use Pre-Application Meeting 9 13 6 9 3 6 1 3 0 0 0 0 Monthly Totals 15 23 17 14 5 12 3 5 0 0 0 0 Annual Total To-Date: 94 Printed 09/14/2020 10:22 Page 2 of 11 Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 01/01/2020 - 08/31/2020 Online Applications Received Community& Public Works Department received a total of 461 Online Applications in August 2020. r 600 400 _1 200 1 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Trade Permit Right of Way Permit Pre-Application Meeting Request Demolition Permit Sign Permit Reroof Permit Other Online Applications = Approach Permit .f Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Approach Permit 0 0 2 7 9 9 12 24 0 0 0 0 Demolition Permit 0 4 1 5 12 4 6 5 0 0 0 0 Other Online Applications 0 1 32 61 83 116 95 98 0 0 0 0 Pre-Application Meeting Request 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reroof Permit 5 25 29 30 59 76 55 65 0 0 0 0 Right of Way Permit 37 51 41 51 68 51 46 55 0 0 0 0 Sign Permit 6 7 9 4 6 10 5 11 0 0 0 0 Trade Permit 1 139 109 151 108 139 208 210 203 0 0 0 0 Monthly Totals 187 197 265 268 376 474 429 461 0 0 0 0 Annual Total To-Date: 2,657 Printed 09/14/2020 10:22 Page 3 of 11 Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 01/01/2020 - 08/31/2020 Construction Applications Received Community& Public Works Department received a total of 495 Construction Applications in August 2020. Th 600 400 200 al 11111111 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Commercial-New ® Commercial-TI Residential-New = Other Construction Permits .1 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Commercial-New 24 70 22 4 1 2 7 1 0 0 0 0 Commercial-TI 0 1 1 0 *2 *15 *12 *7 0 0 0 0 Residential-New 55 49 34 2 3 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 Commercial-Trade 12 16 12 1 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 Residential-Trade 119 71 76 0 5 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 Residential-Accessory 8 5 8 0 0 3 4 *2 0 0 0 0 Demolition 3 *7 *5 *5 *12 *4 *6 *5 0 0 0 0 Sign *10 *8 *10 *6 *6 *11 *5 *11 0 0 0 0 Other Construction Permits 1 *232 *256 *321 *296 *393 *492 *448 *467 0 0 0 0 Monthly Totals 463 483 489 314 422 533 487 495 0 0 0 0 Annual Total To-Date: 3,686 *Includes Online Applications. Printed 09/14/2020 11:18 Page 4 of 11 Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 01/01/2020 - 08/31/2020 Land Use Applications Received Community& Public Works Department received a total of 103 Land Use Applications in August 2020. 200 r1NIM 150 Hp„, _ 100 50 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Boundary Line Adjustment Binding Site Plan Preliminary State Environmental Policy Short Plat Preliminary Final Platting Act(SEPA) Long Plat Preliminary Zoning Map/Comp Plan Amendment Administrative Exception/Interpretation = Other Land Use Permits Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Boundary Line Adjustment 3 5 5 3 *6 4 5 1 0 0 0 0 Short Plat Preliminary 4 4 2 4 3 4 4 5 0 0 0 0 Long Plat Preliminary 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 Binding Site Plan Preliminary 1 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Platting 5 3 3 0 1 2 6 4 0 0 0 0 Zoning Map/Comp Plan Amendment 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA) 3 1 0 1 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 Administrative 1 0 1 0 2 4 0 2 0 0 0 0 Exception/Interpretation Other Land Use Permits 68 146 93 *73 *61 *70 104 *89 0 0 0 0 Monthly Totals 85 159 105 81 ^ 0 - Annual Total To-Date: 817 *Includes Online Applications. Printed 09/14/2020 11:18 Page 5 of 11 Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 01/01/2020 - 08/31/2020 Construction Permits Issued Community& Public Works Department issued a total of 432 Construction Permits in August 2020. T 600 400 1110 III Ill 200 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Commercial-New I_-J Commercial-TI Residential-New = Other Construction Permits Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Commercial-New _ 23 49 25 23 11 24 5 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial TI 1 1 0 1 0 0 6 10 10 0 0 0 0 Residential New ' 43 48 49 6 8 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial-Trade I 13 16 6 1 3 2 5 1 0 0 0 0 Residential-Trade 84 91 91 4 13 7 3 0 0 0 0 0 Residential-Accessory 7 5 6 2 3 2 3 1 0 0 0 0 Demolition 1 5 5 3 7 6 6 2 0 0 0 0 Sign 6 10 11 6 5 13 5 6 0 0 0 0 Other Construction Permits 212 209 278 249 319 476 417 412 0 0 0 0 Monthly Totals 390 433 472 294 369 539 455 432 0 0 0 0 Annual Total To-Date: 3,384 Printed 09/14/2020 11:19 Page 6 of 11 Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 01/01/2020 - 08/31/2020 Land Use Applications Approved Community& Public Works Department approved a total of 2 Land Use Applications in August 2020. r — _ 60 40 20 r 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Boundary Line Adjustment = Binding Site Plan Preliminary State Environmental Policy Short Plat Preliminary Final Platting h Act(SEPA) Long Plat Preliminary Zoning Map/Comp Plan Amendment Administrative Exception/Interpretation = Other Land Use Permits J Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Boundary Line Adjustment 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Short Plat Preliminary 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Long Plat Preliminary 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Binding Site Plan Preliminary 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Platting 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Zoning Map/Comp Plan Amendment 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Administrative 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Exception/Interpretation Other Land Use Permits 23 39 41 0 0 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 Monthly Totals 23 39 41 0 0 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 Annual Total To-Date: 108 Printed 09/14/2020 11:19 Page 7 of 11 Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 01/01/2020 - 08/31/2020 Development Inspections Performed Community& Public Works Department performed a total of 1,271 Development Inspections in August 2020. Development Inspections include building, planning, engineering and ROW inspections. 2,000 1,500 1,000 500 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec -a-- 2018 2019 2020 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Totals 2020 998 1,180 1,232 735 1,404 1,675 1,680 1,271 0 0 0 0 L. 10,175 2019 1,113 772 1,050 1,402 1,417 1,363 1,300 1,485 1,285 1,525 1,137 1,030■ 14,879 2018 1,026 990 1,442 1,384 1,621 1,754 1,413 1,483 1,338 1,451 1,165 962■ 16,029 Printed 09/14/2020 11:20 Page 8 of 11 Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 01/01/2020 - 08/31/2020 Code Enforcement Code Enforcement Officers responded to 57 citizen requests in the month of August. They are listed by type below. Please remember that all complaints, even those that have no violation, must be investigated. 100 50 0111111 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec CE-stop Work Order Environmental General Nuisance = Property Complaint, Non-Violation Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec CE-Stop Work Order 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Complaint,Non-Violation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Environmental 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 General 4 2 7 5 7 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 Nuisance 32 40 26 49 32 39 29 35 0 0 0 0 Property 10 18 21 18 17 19 39 22 0 0 0 0 Monthly Totals 46 60 55 72 56 61 70 57 0 0 0 0 Annual Total To-Date: 477 Printed 09/14/2020 11:20 Page 9 of 11 Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 01/01/2020 - 08/31/2020 Revenue Community& Public Works Department Revenue totaled $188,990 in August 2020. 500,000 400,000 300,000 ir\s\fil\ 200,000 _ 100,000 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep ❑ct Nov Dec •-� 2020 2019 Five-Year Trend Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Totals 2020 $230,256 $402,862 $371,956 $237,120 $402,525 $309,668 $226,943 $188,990 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,370,320 Trend $159,604 $156,291 $228,212 $198,243 $251,439 $198,641 $204,983 $242,691 $194,002 $216,861 $192,571 $179,943 $2,423,484 2019 $162,441 $228,717 $265,529 $195,244 $241,906 $233,496 $355,943 $304,988 $228,157 $294,794 $299,906 $349,821 $3,160,942 2018 $177,431 $117,425 $220,845 $206,090 $234,009 $158,168 $260,179 $362,478 $253,342 $270,649 $204,016 $169,751 $2,634,383 2017 $174,349 $146,874 $133,382 $221,935 $309,558 $265,383 $134,394 $135,242 $149,194 $197,639 $232,319 $159,618 $2,259,887 2016 $212,038 $183,405 $375,848 $187,053 $356,403 $229,293 $124,020 $264,735 $243,514 $163,819 $139,562 $124,778 1$2,604,468 2015 $71,763 $105,035 $145,457 $180,895 $115,321 $106,864 $150,381 $146,012 $95,805 $157,403 $87,053 $95,749 1$1,457,738 Printed 09/14/2020 11:22 Page 10 of 11 Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 01/01/2020 - 08/31/2020 Building Permit Valuation Community& Public Works Department Building Permit Valuation totaled $7,602,626 in August 2020. 60,000,000 40,000,000 20,000,000 }� 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep ❑ct Nov Dec -«- 2020 2019 Five-Year Trend Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Totals 2020 $22.13M $20.94M $36.68M $27.67M $51.38M $30.66M $17.84M $7.60M $0.00M $0.00M $0.00M $0.00M I$214.90M Trend $10.62M $17.16M $23.50M $15.92M $22.33M $20.71M $19.56M $20.58M $16.55M $14.51M $28.27M $13.64M1$223.34M 2019 $5.66M $22.21M $19.46M $12.46M $23.15M $15.02M $46.65M $18.80M $14.36M $17.16M $35.18M $34.15M 1$264.26M 2018 $12.84M $6.35M $27.60M $7.87M $9.55M $26.26M $29.25M $25.44M $20.69M $21.88M $25.46M $6.70M1$219.89M 2017 $23.82M $18.37M $6.98M $30.99M $35.66M $35.63M $9.78M $9.05M $8.88M $10.05M $67.10M $16.78M1$273.09M 2016 $7.83M $28.14M $55.63M $10.10M $36.56M $19.11M $7.07M $41.53M $33.68M $9.06M $7.76M $5.52M 9M 2015 $2.93M $10.71M $7.82M $18.16M $6.73M $7.53M $5.05M $8.06M $5.15M $14.42M $5.86M $5.06M Printed 09/14/2020 11:22 Page 11 of 11 Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 08/01/20 — 08/31/20 MAINTENANCE Agreements for Services Adopted and In Operation * Budget estimates ** Does not include August I Contract Total % of Contract Contract Name Ill Contractor AmountExpended .ALExpended treet Maintenance boe Asphalt 1 $1,500,000.00 $795,766.29 53.05% 111 treet Sweeping FAA Sweeping $560,000.00 $275,414.86 49.18% 111 Ftorm Drain CleanirtIMMFAA Sweepinga. $202,587.50 $148,246.38 73.18% 111 andscaping renske ME $62,985.00 $22,407.86 35.58% Need Spraying 'blearwater $39,000.00 $19,500.00 50.00% mergency Traffic Control ,Penske $15,000.00 $5,775.16 38.50% la jitter and Weed Control IteigerIMMIE $70,000.00 $27,288.30 38.98% si F.tate Highway MaintenancellNSDOT Ill $265,000.00 $178,234.59 67.26% 111 'traffic Signals, Signs, Stripinh pokane County4 $737,000.00 $362,716.46 49.22% IN bead Animal Co Mike Pederson $20,000.00 $5,925.00 29.63% si Snow Season - October 2019 - April 2020 El Ion Call - Graderk Multiple • $500,000.00 $76,062.32 15.21% k:In Call - Plow Drivers 411 Multiple $265,000.00 $105,336.80 39.75% Vn Call - Sidewalk Operator Valley La $40,000.00 $5,593.38 13.98% Citizen Requests for Public Works - August2020 Request Submitted /Waiting In Progress I Resolved token Sprinkler J 6 2 4 Construction - CPWJ 4 0 4 Construction - DevelPRIMII 1 0 1 Dead Animal Removal 6 0 6 Downed Tree / Branch 1 0 1 General Street Maint 4 6 0 6 Graffiti on City Properttd= 1 0 1 Hazard on Street 411= 5 0 5 Illegal Dumping - Object= 8 0 8 t o Pothole II. 4 0 4 treet Sweeping 1 1 0 1 Motion /Weeds ill 16 4 12 WID WASTE IM 1 0 1 TORMWATER 1 8 2 6 19 2 17 Signs: Missing/Damaged 1 10 3 7 Totals 97 M 1 STREET MAINTENANCE ACTIVITY The following is a summary of Contractor maintenance activities in the City of Spokane Valley for August 2020: • Geiger Work Crew—Cutting dryland grass, tree trimming and garbage and dump site removal. • Pothole patching, tree trimming, graffiti removal. • Poe Maintenance Contract—Cracksealing, Asphalt patching on Farr Road, Desmet, Mission, Sprague, Broadway, Sharp, Appleway and 34t". Manhole adjustments and repair, stormwater inlet and drywell repairs and installation of ITS conduit on Fancher at UP Tracks. • AAA sweeping Contract — Arterial sweeping and residential sweeping. Residential sweeping was completed on June 23rd • AAA Sweeping Vactor Contract — Cleaning drywells, sidewalk inlets and north/south arterial catch basins. WASTEWATER Status of the process can be monitored at: http://www.spokaneriver.net/, http://www.ecy.wa.gov/geographic/spokane/spokane river basin.htm, http://www.spokanecounty.org/utilities/WaterReclamation/content.aspx?c=2224 and http://www.spokaneriverpartners.com/ STORMWATER UTILITY The following is a summary of City Stormwater Utility activities for August 2020: • Drywell Retrofit with Pavement Preservation (Dept of Ecology grant)—Continued development of design report to capture proposed retrofits on Argonne/Montgomery I/S and Broadway Havana to Fancher projects. • Spokane Valley Regional Decant Facility: Submitted 90% design package to Department of Ecology for review. • Continued. In concert with the release of the revised Stormwater Management Manual for Eastern Washington (Dept. of Ecology), COSV Stormwater Utility began coordinated effort with City of Spokane, and Spokane County to evaluate the Spokane Regional Stormwater Manual for equivalency. • Appleway Stormwater Improvement project (DOE grant project): continue defining project scope with CIP management and begin developing design report requirements. • Continue process to identify the merits for jurisdictional coverage under the UIC program. Begin subbasin delineation, continued development of 2021 UIC stormwater Management Plan, update sink maps. • Continued updating the Stormwater Utility 0 & M plan. • Participation and support Glenrose, Central Park Flood Insurance Study. • Continued annual management and/or participation of the following service contracts: o Roadway Landscape Maintenance Contract — Contract Awarded — Work underway - Senske. o Street Sweeping Contract—Work underway—AAA Sweeping. o Storm Drain Cleaning Contract—Work underway-AAA Sweeping. o Roadway Weed Control Contract—Work underway- Clearwater Summit • Continued working on the following tasks: o Responded to stormwater related issues, 8 sites. o Stormwater action requests 2020. 2 Current status to date is shown below: Stormwater Action Requests (incl. Public and In-Staff Requests) August-20 Total Requests Logged Since 2009: 672 2020 Completed Project sites: 13 Completed Projects 2009-2019: 295 Locations not warranting work: 294 Total Project Backlog: 83 DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING The following is a summary of Development Engineering activities for August 2020: • Assisted Building and Planning Division with preparation of design requirements for(11) Commercial and (1) Land Use Pre-Application meetings. • Prepared multiple Recommended Conditions of Approvals for preliminary plats and Dedication Languages for final plats. Reviewed multiple final plats and submittal packages to record final plats. • Reviewed civil plans and drainage reports for Engineered Grading Permits associated with commercial and land use projects. Coordinated with private Engineers and Developers. • Reviewed civil plans for the following projects: o Boudreau Commercial Project (EGR-2020-0025) o Lenora Short Plat—4 lots (EGR-2020-0033) o Mirabeau Point BSP Improvements (EGR-2020-0038) o Affinity at Mirabeau Point (EGR-2020-0041) o Spokane Concrete (EGR-2020-0042) o Union Road Short Plat-4 lots (EGR-2020-0043) o Gadberry Short Plat—9 lots (EGR-2020-0045) o Summerfield East 10th Add—37 lots (EGR-2020-0046) o Appleway& Michigan Apartments (EGR-2020-0047) o Union Vista Townhomes (EGR-2020-0051) o Union Road Commercial Improvements (EGR-2020-0053) o Progress Road Short Plat—5 lots (EGR-2020-0056) o Vistas at Belleaire Offsite Sewer Grading Plans (EGR-2020-0059) o Quarry Apartments South (EGR-2020-0060) o Riverside Place at Coyote Rock Phase III (EGR-2020-0061) o Ace Business Park (EGR-2020-0062) o TCF Office Building (EGR-2020-0064) o Main Street Townhomes (EGR-2020-0065) o Garabedian Short Plat—3 lots (EGR-2020-0066) o Nora Office Complex—Grading Only (EGR-2020-0067) o Park& Broadway Gas Station (EGR-2020-0068) o Younker Private Driveway (EGR-2020-0069) o Long Road Frontage Improvements (EGR-2020-0070) o Riverbend at Mission Subdivision—25 lots (EGR-2020-0071) o Mygrant Glass—Grading Only (EGR-2020-0072) o Ridgemont Estates#5—Grading Only (EGR-2020-0074) o Mansfield Apartments (EGR-2020-0075) • Spoke with and emailed citizens and developers to answer inquiries and discuss design requirements for potential commercial and land use projects. • Conducted preconstruction meetings, performed site visits, prepared punch lists, reviewed surety estimates, and reviewed and approved construction certification packages to finalize final plats and to issue commercial building certificates of occupancy. 3 CAPITAL PROJECTS "Q Public Works Projects � ll�e Monthly Summary-Design &Construction ey August-2020 Bid Estimated Total %Complete Project# Design&Construction Projects Funding Proposed Open Construction Project Ad Date Date PE I CN Completion Cost Street Projects 0143 Barker Rd/BNSF Grade Separation FHWA-STP(U) TBD TBD 100 0 12/31/22 $ 6,484,000 0249 Sullivan&Wellesley Intersection Improv FHWA-STP(U) 05/03/19 05/24/19 90 0 12/31/20 $ 1,370,000 0273 Barker/I-90 Interchange WSDOT N/A N/A 100 85 12/31/20 $ 900,000 0275 Barker Rd Widening-River to Euclid FHWA-STP(U) 06/12/20 07/08/20 100 0 12/31/25 $ 3,850,141 0295 Garland Avenue Extension COSV 04/05/19 04/19/19 100 99 12/31/20 $ 2,900,000 0291 Adams Sidewalk lnfiII Project TIB-SP 02/28/20 03/20/20 100 99 11/01/20 $ 440,300 0299 Argonne Rd Concrete Pvmt Indiana to Mont TIB-UAP TBD TBD 50 0 10/31/21 $ 2,800,000 0302 EllaSidewalk:BroadwaytoAlki CDBG 02/28/20 03/20/20 100 100 11/01/20 $ 431,487 0303 S.Conklin Road Sidewalk CDBG 02/28/20 03/20/20 100 100 11/01/20 $ 179,520 0309 Local Access Streets:Barker Homes COSV 04/24/20 05/20/20 100 50 10/30/20 $ 1,812,088 0310 Sullivan Rd Overcrossing UP RR Deck Rep. FHWA-BR TBD TBD 100 0 12/31/21 $ 337,625 0313 Barker Road/Union Pacific Crossing FMSIB TBD TBD 90 0 12/31/22 $ 1,434,000 0318 Wilbur Sidewalk:Boone to Mission TBD TBD 0 0 12/31/22 $ 60,000 Street Preservation Projects 0267 Mission SW-Bowdish to Union TIB-SP 03/01/19 03/22/19 100 99 12/31/20 $ 2,196,922 0285 Indiana Ave Pres-Evergreen to Sullivan COSV 03/06/20 03/06/20 100 95 12/31/20 $ 2,343,166 Traffic Projects 0259 North Sullivan ITS Project FHWA-CMAQ 02/14/20 03/06/20 100 75 12/31/20 $ 1,104,209 0293 2018 CSS Citywide Reflective Signal BP HSIP N/A N/A 100 25 12/31/21 $ 180,000 0294 Citywide Reflective Post Panels HSIP N/A N/A 100 20 12/31/21 $ 78,000 0300 Pines&Mission Intersection Improvement FHWA-CMAQ TBD TBD 60 0 11/01/21 $ 588,000 Parks Projects 0268 Appleway Trail-Evergreen to Sullivan FHWA-STP(U) 06/28/19 07/19/19 100 98 12/31/20 $ 2,516,550 0304 CenterPlace West Lawn Phase 2 COSV 11/22/19 12/20/19 100 85 12/31/20 $ 2,000,000 0305 CenterPlace Roof Repair COSV 05/01/20 05/15/20 100 0 10/01/20 $ 815,000 0314 Balfour Park Frontage Improvements COSV TBD TBD 100 0 12/31/21 $ 66,500 0315 Brown's Park 2020 Improvements COSV 08/28/20 09/18/20 0 0 06/30/21 $ 562,780 0316 Balfour Park Improvements-Phase 1 COSV TBD TBD 0 0 10/15/22 $ 217,500 Design Total %Complete Project# Complete Project Design Only Projects Funding Date PE Cost Street Projects 0205 Sprague/Barker Intersection Improvement FHWA-CMAQ 12/31/20 50 $ 517,337 0223 Pines Rd Underpass @ BNSF&Trent FHWA-STP(U) 12/31/21 27 $ 7,295,000 0301 Park&Mission Intersection Improvements COSV 03/31/21 0 $ 153,500 0311 Sullivan Rd./SR 2901nterchange Project COSV 12/31/23 0 $ 500,000 0320 Sullivan Preservation:Sprague-8th COSV 12/31/20 0 $ 138,000 0321 Argonne Corridor Imprv-North of Knox COSV 12/31/21 5 $ 30,000 Street Preservation Projects 0286 Broadway Preservation:Havana to Fancher COSV 03/31/21 70 $ 67,600 0292 Mullan Preservation:Broadway-Mission COSV 08/31/21 25 $ 75,000 Stormwater Projects 0308 Regional Decant Facility Canopy Dept of Ecology TBD 0 $ 595,535 0317 Appleway Stormwater Improvements Dept of Ecology 03/31/21 20 $ 90,244 4 PLANNING AND GRANTS WSDOT's City Safety Program WSDOT administers the federal Highway Safety Improvement Program and funds projects under the City Safety Program (CSP). Applications were submitted on March 3, 2020 and due March 6, 2020. Awards are anticipated by October 2020. Washington State Department of Commerce Electrification Transportation Systems Grant Program Spokane Regional Transportation Council and Avista Corp. have partnered to submit a regional application for the installation of electric vehicle charging stations for public use.The City would participate by applying to install charging stations at City Hall and CenterPlace.Applications were submitted by SRTC on June 1, 2020 and awards are anticipated in December 2020. USDOT's BUILD Program USDOT administers the Better Utilizing Investment to Leverage Development(BUILD) discretionary grant program. On February 18, 2020, USDOT announced its current call for projects, making available $1 billion for capital projects. The City's application for the Pines/BNSF GSP was submitted on May 13, 2020. Awards expected by September 15, 2020. WSDOT's Safe Routes To School (SRTS) and Pedestrian and Bicyclist Program (PBP) WSDOT administers two parallel funding programs to improve safety for pedestrians and bicyclists. Submitted applications included the Sprague Ave. crossing at City Hall and Bowdish Rd. sidewalks from 12th to 16th Ave., and Bowdish Rd. bike lane and sidewalk from 16th to 22nd Ave. Awards are anticipated by December 2020. Washington State Transportation Improvement Board (TIB) TIB announced its 2020 Call for Projects, making available $60 million statewide, and $6.4 million to our northeast region, for the Urban Arterial Program (UAP). Submitted applications included Argonne Corridor Concrete Reconstruction (Indiana to Montgomery) and Sullivan Preservation and Sidewalk (Sprague to 8th Ave.). Applications were submitted on August 7 and awards are expected Nov. 20, 2020. Pavement Management Update Public Outreach & Education Staff has tabled the topic of an ad-hoc committee due to funding challenges introduced by the annual budgeting process and the impacts of COVID-19.Staff will coordinate with City Council to determine an appropriate time to restart this process. StreetScan—Pavement Condition Evaluation It was identified that the September 2019 pavement condition survey omitted a portion of the City's arterial network. In August, 2020, the StreetScan car will be returning to Spokane Valley to collect data on the omitted street segments. Upon completion, StreetScan's findings report will be completed and the data collection will be closed-out. 5 • Dave Ellis Ozzie Knezovich Chief of Police Sheriff i .,O L 1 Spokane Valley Police Department e , Accredited Since 2011 ;, 1,.,. 1 ., ,\,,,,,,,,,,..Sor.'i,.) Services provided in partnership with _f.,,,,,,66- the Spokane County Sheriff's Office and the Community, Dedicated to Your Safety. TO: Mark Calhoun,City Manager FROM: Dave Ellis, Chief of Police DATE: September 14,2020 RE: Monthly Report August 2020 ADMINISTRATIVE: In early August, the Sheriff commissioned a new entry-level deputy. Keifer Smith is 25 years old and is a Spokane native. He graduated from Rogers High School in 2013 and also attended EWU. He is married and has two young sons. He has been serving with the US Navy since 2015 and was stationed at NAS Whidbey Island. His hobbies include hunting,fishing and coaching youth football. Keifer will be a member of the BLEA Class 810,which begins August 25th in Spokane. Chief Ellis attended Quarterly In-Service training in the month of August. The Spokane Regional Safe Streets Task Force Regional Directors Meeting was held in mid-August,which Chief Ellis attended with other command staff from the Sheriffs Office. Chief Ellis attended the monthly meetings for the Spokane Regional Emergency Communications which were held in August at the Fire Training Center. In late August, there was a web-ex meeting involving heads of agencies to discuss each member's perspective on replacing the current CAD/RMS systems. Chief Ellis and Asst. Chief Kittilstved attended. Chief Ellis along with other law enforcement command staff attended the monthly Joint Terrorism Task Force meeting. SHERIFF'S COMMUNITY ORIENTED POLICING EFFORT (SCOPE): In the month of August, S.C.O.P.E.participated in: • S.C.O.P.E. Basic Training(4 new volunteers • S.C.O.P.E. Volunteers patrolling neighborhoods started in August) and businesses • S.C.O.P.E. Volunteers delivering PPE supplies • S.C.O.P.E.'s SIRT(Sheriff Incident Response weekly to Medical,Fire Stations, Senior Care Team) Salvation Backpack give-away at the Facilities and others Fairgrounds • S.C.O.P.E. Volunteers helping with some Food • Attended Valleyfest organizational meeting Bank drop offs • Radar Speed Awareness Volunteer Patrols working throughout Spokane Valley Page 1 August 2020 Volunteers Hours per Station *Includes estimated volunteer service hours that are provided in the City of Spokane Valley. These two locations cover both Spokane Valley and the unincorporated portion of the county. Location #Volunteers Admin Hours L.E.Hours Total Hours Central Valley 3 39.5 0 39.5 East Valley* 14 129 • 214.5 343.5 Edgecliff I 2 0 2 Trentwood 4 113.5 77.5 191 University 9 164.5 13 177.5 West Valley* 14 313 64.5 377.5 TOTALS 45 761.5 369.5 1,131 Volunteer Value ($31.72 per hour) $35,875.32 for August 2020 The SCOPE Latent Fingerprint Team was given 106 cases for the month of August. Out of those 106 cases,53 were from crimes in Spokane Valley. The team located fingerprints on 20 vehicles; 12 of those were Spokane Valley cases. Although a large number of people set up a time to get their vehicle(s) fingerprinted, a number of those appointments were either cancelled or no-shows. Great job SCOPE Latent Fingerprint Team! S.C.O.P.E. Incident Response Team (SIRT)volunteers contributed 128 on-scene hours (including travel time) in August,responding to crime scenes, motor vehicle accidents and providing traffic control;25 hours were for incidents in Spokane Valley. There was one special event in August,which was in the county. Total volunteer hours contributed by SIRT, including training,stand-by,response and special events is 1,461 for August;total for 2020 is 9,749. Abandoned Vehicles June 2020 July 2020 August 2020 Tagged for Impounding 37 48 30 Cited/Towed 1 0 3 Hulks Processed 13 22 30 Total Vehicles Processed 112 153 117 Yearly Total of Vehicles Processed 484 637 754 SCOPE DISABLED PARKING ACTIVITY REPORT City of Spokane Valley #of # of Hrs. #of Disabled # of #of Non- Vol. Infractions Warnings Disabled Issued Issued Infractions Issued January 4 22.5 2 25 0 February 4 18.5 3 30 0 March 2 6 0 8 0 April 0 0 0 0 0 May 0 0 0 0 0 June 0 0 0 0 0 July 0 0 0 0 0 August 0 0 0 0 0 YTD Total 10 47 5 63 0 Page 2 Spokane County # of #of Hrs. #of Disabled # of # of Non- Vol. Infractions Warnings Disabled Issued Issued Infractions Issued January 2 16.4 4 10 0 February 3 12.5 1 10 0 March 2 9 0 4 0 April 0 0 0 0 0 May 0 0 0 0 0 June 0 0 0 0 0 July 0 0 0 0 0 August 3 3.5 0 2 0 YTD Total 10 41.4 5 26 0 OPERATIONS: Major Crimes Detectives Arrest Stabbing Suspect-Spokane Valley Major Crimes Detectives arrested a stabbing suspect after an early morning dispute turned violent. The victim was transported to the hospital with serious injuries, but they did not appear to be life-threatening. In early August, at approximately 6:15 a.m., Spokane Valley Deputies responded to the report of a person who had been stabbed at an apartment complex located in the 12400 block of E. Riverside Ave. in Spokane Valley. Deputies arrived and contacted the adult stabbing victim lying on the ground,just outside of an apartment. He said the 28-year- old male suspect stabbed him and ran back into his (the suspect's) apartment. As Sergeant Whapeles and Deputy Sullivan approached the suspect's open door, an adult female ran toward them, yelling her toddler was still inside the apartment sleeping. Fearing for the young child's safety and not knowing what the suspect may do,they entered to remove the sleeping child to ensure his safety. The suspect was believed to be in the shower during the rescue of the child. Afterward, deputies remained outside the open door of the apartment and announced their presence. They gave the male suspect commands to exit with his hands up; he complied with additional commands and was taken into custody without incident. Major Crimes Detectives and Spokane County Sheriff's Forensic Technicians were called to the scene to continue the investigation and collect evidence. The victim was transported to the hospital with what appeared to be severe, but not life-threatening, injuries. The suspect was provided medical treatment before being transported to the Public Safety Building. Deputy Bonney developed probable cause to charge the male suspect with Assault 15' Degree and Burglary 1'Degree; following an interview, he was booked into the Spokane County Jail on those charges. Suspect Arrested for Theft of a Dog- Spokane Valley Patrol Deputies located a suspect who reportedly stole a German Shepard from a residence in California. The Shepard was a gift to the victim's Autistic child and was taken from their yard on July 31,2020. In early August,at approximately 6:55 p.m., Spokane Valley Deputy Krystal Bitzer and Deputy Natalie Woolard responded to a suspicious person call in a residential area, east of Sullivan and 1611' Avenue. The caller reported a 59-year-old male contacted her, inquiring about her neighbor. She knew her neighbor was out of town for a few days, so she called her neighbor's family member and confirmed that the suspect is the nephew of her neighbor. The suspect told her he and his dog, a German Shepard, needed a place to stay for a couple of days, and that's why he showed up at his uncle's home. The male suspect parked at his uncle's residence and stayed in his vehicle, leaving periodically. The following day, the caller said she was on the phone with the family member she talked with the day before and learned the male suspect stole the German Shepard from the neighbor of another family member who lived in California. She provided the victim's name and contact information to the deputies. During a phone call,the victim confirmed the German Shepard was stolen from her yard on July 31,2020. Her home surveillance video showed the male suspect take the dog from her fenced yard. She explained the Shepard was given to her Autistic Page 3 son as a gift. She provided pictures of the dog and licensing paperwork from the State of California. Deputy Bitzer and Deputy Woolard tried to contact the male suspect at the residence, but he had already left. At approximately 8:30 p.m., the original caller reported the suspect and the Shepard had returned, but he was - .._ gone again when the deputies arrived. The following ' gFRIF ' �.e�.trnefieu Deputy Bitzer observed a Y -` day, at about 12:10 a.m., p t3' .� truck matching the description of the suspect's,parked _ in a parking lot in the same general area, just off '` ^ ' • - Sullivan. As she approached the vehicle,she observed the suspect and the Shepard inside. Once additional 4• .0 deputies arrived to assist, they woke up the suspect and detained him. He was informed of his rights and agreed to answer questions. He said the prior week, he observed the Shepard running free near a highway onramp(CA). He knew the dog belonged to his friend, -- _ Jose. He retrieved the dog and drove away. The male . • suspect didn't return the dog to his friend, who hesor ,- stated lived a half-mile away because he went to meet - a friend, and after he did, he wasn't going back. When he was asked if failure to return the Shepard wasn't considered stealing,he replied,"Well, once you put it like that, it sounds like it." The male suspect declined to answer additional questions and asked for a lawyer. He was transported and booked into the Spokane County Jail for Possession of Stolen Property 2"d Degree. SCRAPS took custody of the Shepard until arrangements could be made to have her picked up. Adult Suspect Arrested for Shooting Juvenile During Altercation - Spokane Valley Patrol Deputies located a suspect who reportedly shot a juvenile male during an altercation at a party in Spokane Valley. The suspect was charged with Assault 1st Degree. The victim's wounds were serious, but not believed to be life-threatening. In early August, at approximately 12:20 a.m., Spokane Valley Deputies responded to the report of a shooting in the 12800 block of E. 36"' Avenue in Spokane Valley. Deputies and Spokane Valley Fire personnel arrived quickly and located a juvenile male Iying in the street, suffering from a gunshot wound to the groin area. He was provided medical treatment and rushed to an area hospital for additional medical aid. Through the subsequent investigation, initial information indicated the incident started as an altercation between two juvenile females over the phone/social media. The stepfather and mother of one of the involved females got in their vehicle, a black SUV, and proceeded to the party on 36'1'Avenue. Shortly after they arrived, an altercation ensued, and the 25-year-old stepdad got involved. The juvenile male victim jumped in to stop the suspect from hitting the juvenile female. During the struggle,the suspect shot the juvenile victim, striking the juvenile victim in the upper thigh/groin area. The male suspect, the adult female, and juveniles got in the SUV and fled the area. As Patrol units arrived on the scene,Deputy Amber Tyler observed a black SUV near 8°i and Dishman Mica. Deputy Tyler stopped the vehicle a few minutes later near Sprague and Park. The occupants, including the suspect, were detained without incident. Major Crimes Detectives responded to the scene to assist with the investigation. Detective Drapeau developed probable cause to arrest the male suspect for Assault 1st Degree.During an interview, after being advised of his rights, the suspect admitted to driving to the residence on E. 36'" Avenue. He got into an altercation and admitted to firing his handgun into the ground to disperse the large crowd that he said, approached, and threatened him, but he did not intend to hurt anyone. A .45 ACP pistol, which contained ammunition consistent with the spent casing found at the scene, was located inside the vehicle. The suspect was transported and booked into the Spokane County Jail for Assault 1s` Degree. The victim received medical treatment for what appeared to be a serious, but non-life-threatening, injury. Impaired Driver Tries to Avoid Arrest,Almost Strikes Deputy-Spokane Valley Patrol Deputies arrested the driver of a vehicle after she fled from a parking lot in Spokane Valley.While attempting to contact the driver,the deputy was almost hit by the suspect when she fled in her vehicle.The suspect was arrested Page 4 after a pursuit was ended by a successful PIT maneuver(Pursuit Intervention Technique). In mid-August, at approximately 4:15 p.m., Spokane Valley Deputies responded to the McDonald's parking lot located at 15 S. Havana, for a call of two people who appeared to be smoking methamphetamine in the parking lot inside a black sedan. When the deputies arrived, they observed a black Volkswagen Passat parked in the furthest available southwest parking stall. The 33-year-old female driver and an adult male passenger were observed in the vehicle and appeared to be asleep or passed out. After approaching the car, a large amount of drug paraphernalia was observed. The female suspect was unconscious and holding a syringe, containing a brown colored liquid, in her right hand resting on her thigh. She also had a thick blue rubber band tied tightly around the top of her left bicep. Loud announcements of"Sheriff's Office" awoke the pair, who failed to follow commands to keep their hands visible. She looked over her shoulder and made eye contact with the deputy. She quickly untied the rubber band and began reaching around. She continued to ignore commands and started the car. The deputy tried to open the driver's door, but it was locked. The female suspect then placed the vehicle in reverse and backed up quickly,while turning the steering wheel. The front end of her car swung around, almost hitting the deputy. The deputy backed up to avoid being hit, as the female suspect looked down and placed her car in drive. She then looked at the deputy and accelerated while appearing to intentionally steer toward the deputy, who swiftly moved out of the vehicle's path to avoid being struck. Believing the female suspect was highly impaired and purposely attempted to assault the deputy with her vehicle,the deputies ran to their patrol vehicle,activated the emergency lights/siren,and began pursuing the Volkswagen.The female suspect fled east on Sprague and entered 1-90 westbound from Faucher,in a continued attempt to evade the deputies. The suspect took the Division St.exit,struck an SUV,and squeezed between two other vehicles stopped at the red light. As she did,she hit one of the cars and narrowly missed a pedestrian in the crosswalk. The female suspect's actions were incredibly reckless and demonstrated a complete disregard for the safety of the public. With the driver's side tire now completely flat and disintegrating,the female suspect almost lost control as she made a quick left turn on rd from Division. Seeing several people in the crosswalk at the intersection of 2nd and Browne, the deputy quickly decided to initiate a PIT maneuver to stop the suspect from injuring pedestrians and motorists in the area, in her attempt to evade arrest. As the deputy moved into position, the female suspect slammed on her brakes, causing the vehicles to collide. She quickly accelerated toward the pedestrians, but the deputy was able to reposition and conduct a successful PIT. The suspect attempted to steer out of the PIT and drove into a parked SUV. She tried to escape, but the deputy pulled around, pinning the suspect's vehicle, preventing her from driving toward the crowded intersection. The suspect and the passenger initially failed to comply with commands, but were eventually taken into custody with the assistance of several arriving deputies and Spokane Police Department Officers.The male passenger was not charged with a crime,but complained of back pain. He and the female suspect were transported to the hospital to be medically evaluated. During the investigation and after being advised of her rights,the female suspect said she ran because she was scared and didn't want to lose her kids, who were currently not in her care. She apologized for her actions, saying she would never intentionally try to hurt a cop and that she didn't remember colliding with other motorists. A search warrant was obtained to collect a blood sample from the female suspect. At that time, she said without being asked, "I'm probably gonna test positive for meth and heroin." The suspect was transported and booked into the Spokane County Jail for Assault 2nd Degree, Attempting to Elude a Police Vehicle, and DUI. Her vehicle was impounded pending a search warrant and subsequent search. While responding to assist, a second deputy was involved in a collision at Sprague and Havana with minor injuries reported by the motorist. Washington State Patrol Troopers, Spokane Police Officers, and Spokane County Sheriff's Deputies assisted in this incident. Fleeing Suspect Attempts to Enter Occupied Vehicle and Resists Arrest/Citizen Aids Deputy During Struggle-The driver of a vehicle fled from a Spokane Valley Deputy until the suspect struck a curb. The suspect ran from the car and, during the foot pursuit, attempted to enter an occupied vehicle, but the driver sped away before he could make it inside. The deputy caught up to the suspect and tried to take him into custody, but he resisted arrest. Seeing the struggle,a citizen ran over to assist,stripped off the suspect's necklace,which held a knife and helped the deputy safely gain control of the suspect. In late August, Spokane Valley Deputy Travis West observed a green Pontiac Sunfire, occupied by two males, traveling in the opposite direction near 3'd and Havana. Deputy West noticed the vehicle did not have a front license plate, as required by law, and turned his marked patrol car around to initiate a traffic stop. By the time Page 5 he turned around, the 25-year-old male driver had accelerated to a high rate of speed, southbound on Havana. The male suspect made an abrupt turn on 5th, traveling west at a high speed and recklessly passing another vehicle. Due to the suspect's reckless behavior,Deputy West activated his emergency lights, signaling the suspect to pull over and stop. Instead,the male suspect made the choice to continue his attempt to flee. He turned north on Freya, but due to the excess speed, he could not maintain control. The suspect collided with the far-side curb and came to a stop in the middle of the road. As Deputy West pulled up to the car,the suspect jumped out and began to flee on foot. Deputy West identified himself and told the suspect to stop. The male suspect continued to run with Deputy West gaining on him. Near 3" and Freya, the suspect attempted to get into an occupied vehicle stopped for the traffic light and actually opened the rear door of a car. Not knowing if the male suspect was armed and trying to steal the car or take the occupants hostage, Deputy West drew his sidearm, ordering the suspect not to enter the vehicle The male suspect looked up at Deputy West and fell backward and away from the car. The driver, and potential victim, accelerated and fled the area. Deputy West quickly holstered his weapon and moved in to take the male suspect into custody, who began to struggle and resist. The deputy noticed a sheathed dagger near the suspect's hands, which appeared to be attached to his necklace. Fearing the suspect would grab the knife if he gained control of his hands, Deputy West delivered a knee strike to the suspect's lower back, but it had little effect. During the continued struggle, a concerned citizen ran up to assist. Deputy West announced the suspect had a knife as the concerned citizen ripped it from the suspect's reach. With the continued help of the citizen,Deputy West gained control of the suspect.Arriving deputies detained the male passenger who was cooperative and later released without charges. The concerned citizen said he witnessed Deputy West chasing the suspect and the suspect's attempt to enter the occupied vehicle. He jumped in to help when he saw the male suspect resisting arrest. Deputy West thanked him for his assistance before he left the scene. The suspect refused medical assistance and declined to answer questions or make any statements. A check of his name revealed his driver's license was suspended and that he had a history of law enforcement contacts. The suspect was transported and booked into the Spokane County Jail for Attempting to Elude a Police Vehicle, Obstructing, Resisting Arrest, and Driving while Suspended 3rd Degree. Deputy West worked to determine the identity of the driver of the vehicle the suspect attempted to enter. He eventually made contact and learned she was scared, but not injured. This remains an active investigation and additional charges are possible. Driver Runs from Injury Accident,Enters Unoccupied Home,and Refuses to Surrender-Spokane Valley SWAT Team, K9 Units, EDU Technicians, and deputies worked together to peacefully arrest an uncooperative suspect who ran from a minor injury collision. The suspect fled, eventually entered an unoccupied home, and refused to surrender. After several hours, SWAT Team members were able to take the suspect into custody safely. In late August, at approximately 2:20 p.m., Spokane Valley Deputies responded to a reported two-car injury collision at 32nd and Bowdish. While responding, deputies received information one of the involved drivers fled the scene on foot. Witnesses began reporting the 49-year-old male suspect, a convicted felon, was running through the neighborhood. Information was also received that he attempted to enter occupied homes in the area during his attempted escape. Additional witness information led deputies to a home in the 2800 block of S. Bates, where they found an open door. Deputies established a perimeter, requested K9 Units to respond, and began giving announcements over the PA systems advising the male suspect to surrender. The homeowner was contacted and advised no one should be inside the residence. Deputies were given permission to enter the home,and they were advised weapons were accessible. The male suspect refused to comply with commands to surrender, and the SWAT Team was requested to assist. Deputies requested and obtained a search warrant. SWAT took over the scene and, with the assistance of an EDU (Explosive Detonation Unit) robot began to clear portions of the home. It was determined the suspect was inside, and with his continued refusal to reveal his location and peacefully surrender, chemical irritants were deployed. With the homeowner's information that the suspect could access firearms if he scavenged through the residence and visual confirmation, he had done exactly that; great care was taken as plans were made to end this extremely dangerous situation peacefully. After all attempts to contact the suspect and convince him to surrender peacefully failed, SWAT Team members entered the home with the assistance of K9 Zeus and his handler Deputy Kullman. At approximately 11:45 pan.,K9 Zeus located the suspect hiding under a bed. He was found to be in possession of several weapons, but due to the SWAT Team's slow and Page 6 methodical tactics, he was successfully and safely taken into custody.The male suspect was transported and booked into the Spokane County jail on several charges to include Residential Burglary, Felony Hit and Run, and Unlawful Possession of a Firearm. We thank everyone in the area of this intense incident for the help and patience, as our deputies and special teams planned and worked together to reach their goal of safely ending this potentially deadly situation. Suspect Arrested Following Early Morning ,, 7.1 ‘ ''; c. �/ '-t Assault with a Knife - Spokane Valley Deputies r i '4 if ill , , `. 5i\�� r'� ,.. , `a o responded to a fight call involving two or three .,.� , subjects. Deputies located all three of the persons i'�„ " 4' ,, ,1 ,r la_v .91 involved, eventually arresting one for Assault 1st '� ;- , �, a ; �:�' , ..,*. Degree. In late August, at approximately 4:55 a.m., `� > .',.,. %. . '�• Spokane Valley Deputies responded to a reported ' ' .ly g ';, , ;S„� fight on the Appleway Trail near Sullivan. Deputy I. , !4 —� t if, Van Patten arrived at the location and contacted one ,A. { r ' p '� '" W "'i§ ' of the victims. He stated the 44-year-old male ,,:.. ^, ' ;,: j suspect threatened him and the second victim with a ,� 4'H • '', ! , p . ' knife while they slept on the Appleway Trail. He ' ! !'! .) i . t 1 '+ �-'� '� said he defended himself, and the suspect was `)°�'a ;}- ,e 4,,e ` , ,,: .'' r,r tv),,, :. �5,.6- • I; ,,, ;'+ � .1 gib ,' a lir 11 leaving the area, walking west on the trail. Deputy • Van Patten provided the information to the other deputies responding to assist and drove to Adams and the trail. She observed the male suspect walking quickly toward her position. Not knowing if the suspect was still armed with a knife, she turned on her patrol vehicle's emergency lights and spotlight. Over her vehicle's PA system, she gave the suspect commands to stop walking which he initially ignored. After she repeated the commands,the suspect stopped and began to comply, The suspect,who was bleeding profusely from his head, was safely detained and provided medical treatment. The first victim stated he was awoken when the suspect kicked over the victim's bike and cart. He noticed a knife in the suspect's hand as the suspect said he would kill the two men. He knocked the knife from the suspect's hand as the suspect lunged toward him. He yelled for the second victim to wake up as the suspect retrieved the knife. When the suspect lunged toward the second victim, the first, fearing for his and the second victim's life, hit the suspect over the head with a pipe. Soon after, the suspect observed the deputies arriving and left the location traveling west on the trail.The second victim gave a similar account of the assault and how it occurred, but stated he did not wish to pursue charges against the male suspect. The suspect told Deputy Lang that he was whistling while walking on the trail to get cigarettes, Suddenly a male(the first victim),holding a large pipe,jumped out of the bushes and yelled at him to shut up. The male began assaulting the suspect with the pipe without saying another word. After being forced to the ground, he got up and walked away until deputies contacted him. The male suspect claimed he was not armed with a knife during the incident. Deputies located the suspect's knife near the trail approximately 100' east of Adams. His brother, who had arrived at the scene to see what was happening, confirmed the knife was the suspect's. After receiving medical attention,the male suspect was transported and booked into the Spokane County Jail for Assault 1st Degree. Deputies Administer Narcan to Unconscious Female Suffering an Overdose,Potentially Saving Her Life - Spokane Valley Patrol Deputies responded to a reported overdose where CPR bad been started. Finding the female unresponsive with shallow, ineffective breathing,Narcan was administered to reverse the believed overdose of heroin. She regained consciousness as medics arrived. In late August, at approximately 9:35 p.m., Spokane Valley Deputy Griffin Criswell and Deputy Tyler Kullman were in the area of a medics call. A female was not breathing from a suspected overdose, and CPR was in progress. When the deputies arrived, the female was being tended to by a male and female. All three appeared homeless. The unconscious female was breathing very shallow and with ineffective breaths.Needle marks were observed on her arms, and she was unresponsive. Believing she was in medical distress and her life was in danger due to a possible opioid overdose, Deputy Criswell and Deputy Kullman provided medical attention. Deputy Criswell Page 7 administered one ampoule of Narcan. With attempts to get her to respond unsuccessful, a second ampoule of Narcan was provided. Within approximately one minute after receiving the second dose, she began to regain consciousness and sit up. Spokane Valley Fire and AMR personnel arrived and took over her medical care. She agreed to go to the hospital to be evaluated and went to the ambulance. Deputy Criswell and Deputy Kullman began contacting other apparent homeless people who were near the incident to see if they witnessed what exactly happened. Shortly afterward, AMR personnel advised the female refused medical treatment against their advice and walked away. Addiction continues to plague our community, leaving destruction, pain, and sometimes death in its wake. Many programs and organizations are willing to help people who suffer from addiction, but the challenge continues to be getting the person to accept help as they take the long and challenging road to recovery. We encourage residents who have operational surveillance cameras outside their home to go to the Sheriffs website and register their home and video cameras. Thank you. htt•s://www.s•okanecoun .or 1080/Sheriff 1,. - 111:::11 (6) O VIP Video identification Program CLICK HERE to Voluntarily join the VW program L 0 C K LOCK OBSERVE CARS SHOULD KEEP GARAGE ITEMS IN AND REPORT NEVER RUN DOORS CLOSED YOUR TRUNK UNATTENDED Page 8 Spokane County Sheriff's Office ,,,c0uNo.. Regional Intelligence Group o i ,. -'J --i Spokane Valley Districts fL_ ° :=>f IBR Classification: Burglary kiC; 9 90 I i 80 70 60 , 4 50 4-2017 411411111,".11" 40 I i 2018 30 i 2019 i Calendar 2020 20 1 , I 10 I i 1 I 0 i >- r x -, r w >- 1- cc s cc cc cc cc u cc a 2 _t to w w w w 4 cc a 7 = M D m m m m Z w 2 m w 1- w w m a F u > u L a. O o w w w 2 p ta Year Month Count 2017 2018 2019 Calendar 2020. January 55 51 33 40 February 53 26 20 56 March 42 33 37 53 April 49 36 35 70 May 47 34 57 69 June 59 29 38 69 July 51 44 48 63 ` August 56 51 57 58 September 78 38 50 October 37 48 46 November 32 49 40 December 33 47 40 Grand Total 592 486 501 478 * IBR Offense: Burglary/Breaking&Entering 220 Produced: 9/14/2020 For Law Enforcement Use Only This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF. inauthorized persons pursuant to RCW 42.56.420 Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. Spokane County Sheriffs Office a. ,GauNfj.s Regional Intelligence Group o l-? - ----,.-0 Spokane Valley Districts A IBR Classification: Murder NonNeg Manslaughter tlIG c 1.2 1 1 1 i 1 ■ ♦ ♦ A 0,8 p.6 2017 Ei — --2018 I I --A-2019 0.4 Calendar 2020 0.2 l l 0 y ›- T y w - H cc cc cr cc w cc u a z " w w w w a v cc a 2 D D m m m m a -' l9 2 0 2 2 z c. 2 n w H w w --, w Q d 0 o w w N 2 d Year Month Count 2017 2018 2019 Calendar 2020 January February 1 March April May 1 June 1 July 1 August September October November 1 December 1 Grand Total 2 1 1 2 *IBR Offense: Murder/Non-Negligent Manslaughter 09A Produced: 9/14/2020 For Law Enforcement Use Only This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF. 'nauthorized persons pursuant to RCW 42.56.420 Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. Spokane County Sheriff's Office ,,.,G°UNT . Regional Intelligence Group VO '} yka,s. Spokane Valley Districts l . _ . ;6?i IBR Classification: Identity Theft RIG C) 500 450 400 i 350 300 250 —A—2017 I 200 �-2018 —A-2019 150 Calendar 2020 I 100 50 ...414.....L41/11\„ I 0 I I i >- r x 1 Y w oe u — �£ Z 1 un w w w w a. 03 ca 03 z m 7 @ w O- w w ¢ m Q r u i u LL a a O w w p sn Year Month Count 2017 2018 2019 Calendar 2020 January 9 20 19 17 ..._ February 24 16 10 16 March 22 13 13 12 April 16 22 19 17 May 32 21 13 442 June 19 17 5 48 July 23 14 12 25 August 13 14 8 27 September 17 13 14 October 15 21 17 November 19 23 12 December 25 16 7 Grand Total 234 210 149 604 *IBR Offense:Identity Theft 26F Produced: 9/14/2020 For Law Enforcement Use Only This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF. unauthorized persons pursuant to RCW 42.56.420 Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. Spokane County Sheriff's Office �courvTy Regional Intelligence Groupa. 07 Spokane Valley Districts { IBR Classification: Fraud SIG 9 90 80 70 ` --'1.111-11111114111 60 \\:'\y41111W4111111111 . 50r I ' i I —4-2017 40 —0-2018 f —A-2019 30 Calendar 2020 20 10 0 I - Y S w >- w } F a cc cc cc x [IC U cc Q Z —' in w w w w a < �c D CO m CO CO Z CC 7 p u I— w w CO < i- U > u I —. w a 4 p w Lk- w Z O (/1 Year Month Count 2017 2018 2019 Calendar 2020 January 26 69 65 70 February 36 46 32 58 March 37 59 63 49 April 43 55 57 61 May 53 67 56 85 June 57 65 50 73 July 61 65 65 63 August 53 62 65 70 V September 66 49 55 October 64 60 75 November 54 56 68 December 43 60 49 Grand Total 593 713 700 529 * IBR Offense:Fraud-Credit Card/ATM 26B, Fraud-False Pretenses/Swindling/Con Games 26A,&Fraud-Impersonation 26C Produced: 9/14/2020 For Law Enforcement Use Only This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use ovn aPDF. unauthorized persons pursuant to RCW 42.56.420 Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. Spokane County Sheriff's Office COuNrjs� Regional Intelligence Group o,,k...'z' r ,,., rv... i„L. 1.13.1. , --- -4 00 Spokane Valley Districts ' -e IBR Classification: DUI R[G q 45 Ii 40 35 30 \ ill\ 25 �, i —�—2017 20Illiliialk'' —2018 15 —1—2019 Calendar 2020 1a 5 0 } } = J 7 w } F p[ c[ q cc ac cc U cc Q z _1 v, w w w w < Q > > m m rro m z a 2 D w I— w w 4 m. 4 F-- U > U -, w 0 0 to w w z 0 in Year Month Count 2017 2018 2019 Calendar 2020 January 22 21 32 25 February 26 18 21 28 March 33 39 21 9 April 18 13 27 18 May 19 33 18 16 June 28 23 27 27 July 26 15 25 25 August 24 28 23 22 September 19 37 40 October 24 33 29 - November 18 31 35 December 20 22 21 Grand Total 277 313 319 170 * IBR Offense:DU!90D Produced: 9/14/2020 For Law Enforcement Use Only This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF. mauthorized persons pursuant to RCW 42,55.420 Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice, Spokane County Sheriff's Office ,�'ccotlNr� Regional Intelligence Group o i C Hh 'rcy Spokane Valley Districts i_ IBR Classification: Drugs R I G q 80 . 70 , • I 60 fw 50 , I 40 —0-2017 I —M--2018 30 I1 —t—2019 Calendar 2020 20 0 ' r r 2 _. > w r F-, cc cc cc cc cc U cc a Z -- ,I w w w w a a cc d m n m co m m z cc 7 n w F- w w d 0 0 LL w p u Year Month Count 2017 2018 2019 Calendar 2020 January 19 42 52 49 February 30 38 42 61 March 30 64 58 53 April 37 56 67 38 May 23 36 40 64 June 20 56 30 53 July _ _ 2.1 57 45 38 August 26 43 54 33 September 25 33 43 October 24 52 44 November 39 41 56 December 25 48 40 Grand Total 319 566 571 389 * IBR Offense: Drug Equipment Violations 35B&Drugs/Narcotics Violations 35A Produced: 9/14/2020 For Law Enforcement Use Only This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF. inauthorized persons pursuant to RCW 42.56.420 Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. cOUN County Sheriffs Office �, �-�, Regional Intelligence Group 4.34 1 <ti,, o` A. . i). ... __ 74 Spokane Valley Districts . .; ',, 1BR Classification: Theft From Motor Vehicle RIG () ' 160 , I 140 1.20 1 4 I no ¢- d Sr 80 ►" —4 —2017 —0—zals 60 —A-2019 —0—Calendar 2020 40 0. 20 i 0 I > r z w r w r H cc cc cc c oc ccU a Q Z -� vi w w w w ¢ ¢ d an m m Z cc 2 m w 1— w w Q coQ I— U > u w a O o w w Z o Year Month Count 2017 201.8 2019 Calendar 2020 _ January 99 75 51 67 February 104 32 44 98 March 94 78 72 58 April 130 62 120 75 May 78 69 140 85 June 107 66 84 81 July 97 106 112 76 August 69 87 98 149 September 118 85 80 October 70 104 97 November 52 112 95 December 70 70 112 Grand Total 1088 946 1106 689 * 1BR Offense:Theft From Motor Vehicle 23F Produced: 9/14/2020 For Law Enforcement Use Only This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF. inauthorized persons pursuant to RCW 42.56.420 Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. Spokane County Sheriffs Office ,coUtv-rj. Regional Intelligence Group p� <fG Spokane Valley Districts l ,•.:. IBR Classification: Motor Vehicle Theft ii' ICi `) 50 45 1 40 i VW., illiii4ok 35 30 -I 4 i 25 \1111"11111Plirmillifr —6-2017 —U--2018 20 —A-2019 15 1 f Calendar 2020 10 5 0 r r = _ , w > H c[ ac r. a . u , Q Z w v, w w w w 7 7 an al coea 7 7 Q Q ? l9 2 O 2 2 2 oc 2 7 w F-- w w Q w Q a Q >Q w w w p Year Month Count 2017 2018 2019 Calendar 2020 January 44 36 34 32 February 37 24 22 32 March 44 28 19 31 April 42 27 29 29 May 27 25 33 29 June 28 24 25 33 July 41 39 31 25 August 36 18 31 26 September 43 26 37 October 40 31 25 November 34 45 36 December 28 29 35 Grand Total 444 352 357 237 * IBR Offense: Motor Vehicle Theft 240 Produced: 9/14/2020 For Law Enforcement Use Only This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF. 'nauthorized persons pursuant to RCW 42.56.420 Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. Spokane County Sheriff's Office COUNTj;Pf Regional Intelligence Group o a ,J,� „Ew,,n Spokane Valley Districts ! -`). IBR Classification: Robbery RIG q 14 12 1 i I 10 8 i +2017 s , I11*‘ - 1 r _ —M—2018 —A-2019 / iv a 4 ■—Calendar 2020 2 0 1 r >- x _, r w } r re re s re s cc U ce a z -' w w w w w n m m [o m z s M D w 1 w w Q Q w o 0 w w w w z en Year Month Count 2017 2018 2019 Calendar 2020 January 3 6 3 8 February 6 2 8 12 March 7 5 4 6 _ April 3 6 4 8 May 2 8 6 3 June 1 3 2 8 July 4 7 8 5 August 1 6 11 6 September 4 6 8 October 4 5 7 November 3 3 11 December 1 4 10 Grand Total 39 61 82 56 * IBR Offense: Robbery 120 Produced: 9/14/2020 For Law Enforcement Use Only This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF, inauthorized persons pursuant to RCW 42.56.420 Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. Spokane County Sheriff's Office C•OUJV7'. r4,:1141j Regional Intelligence Group Q�' �ERl�e" Spokane Valley Districts l- .t{F , IBR Classification: Assault RIG g 120 100 ./AA,.... , . 80 )110041110"."11141111311:41°4f f 60 —4-2017 —U-2018 —*-2019 40 • -0—Calendar 2020 1 1 20 1 1 0 } > Y J Y w } H d CC CC CC R' (-] ce a Z «-I VI W w w w a a CC ® co m rn z 2 n L., 1- L., w a co ¢ F- u 7 U -I LUW a- 0 0 w w z o N Year Month Count 2017 2018 2019 Calendar 2020 January 96 84 71 93 February 95 62 62 95 March 78 100 74 80 April 90 88 68 97 May 93 80 87 87 June 93 102 79 104 July 95 112 103 87 August 73 84 95 98 September 92 76 72 October 87 82 67 November 84 79 85 December 84 89 77 Grand Total 1060 1038 940 741 * IBR Offense:Aggravated Assault 13A&Simple Assault 13B Produced: 9/14/2020 For Law Enforcement Use Only This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF, inauthorized persons pursuant to RCW 42.56.420 Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. Spokane County Sheriff's Office etJrv� s� Regional Intelligence Group p Go •� .FRltq Hrl ,Spokane Valley Districts Go ,` ' IBR Classification: Theft RIG g 300 I 250 i„ 1 ---....k_ -..„44440,N4, 000,7 200NOW 1 I i 150 1 +2017 —Z—2018 —A—2019 700 I U—Calendar 2020 1 50 0 >- } = - } w >- 1- cc cc cc cc K 0.' U cc Q z -a V) w w W w q <Q c 0 0 m m m m a 0 < < 0 0 2 z cc 2 m w 1 w w Q m <{ I-- U > U --, w s U p w w w z O VI Year Month Count 2017 2018 2019 Calendar 2020 January 205 238 238 240 February 199 165 188 199 March 214 208 212 197 April 203 202 208 181 May 235 230 230 154 June 251 223 230 219 July 236 236 236 198 August 222 213 256 169 September 213 194 230 October 237 234 239 November 219 198 206 December 198 251 231 Grand Total 2632 2592 2704 1557 * IBR Offense:Theft-All Other 23H,Theft-Pocket-Picking 23A,Theft- Purse-Snatching 23B,Theft-Shoplifting 23C,Theft From Building 23D, Theft From Coin-Operated Machine 23F, &Theft of Motor Vehicle Parts/Accessories 23G Produced: 9/14/2020 For Law Enforcement Use Only This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF. 'nauthorized persons pursuant to RCW 42.56.420 Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. Spokane County Sheriff's Office �,coUNTy Regional Intelligence Group I A, 1 r---i N (,) ,,,:.,,.i _. ...rs Spokane Valley Districts - - x ' IBR Classification: Rape -RIG c 18 i i 16 I I 12 • 10 I t2017 8 /A1 2018 ---2019 6 l �—Calendar 2020 4 1 . ti . \ 2 0 • cc U cC S Z w til w w w w z . 2 D w 1— w , q m •4 F- V u w r� a w L'- w z O vl Year Month Count 2017 2018 2019 Calendar 2020 January 9 16 3 2 February 2 4 3 2 March 3 8 4 2 April 7 6 5 May 9 9 3 3 June 2 7 5 4 — July 6 5 3 1 August 5 3 4 3 September 2 3 9 October 7 1 4 November 1 6 2 December 4 7 4 Grand Total 57 75 49: 17 *IBR Offense:Rape-Forcible 11A,Sodomy-Forcible 11B,Sexual Assault Produced: 9/14/2020 with Object- 11C For Law Enforcement Use Only This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF. unauthorized persons pursuant to RCW 42.56.420 Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. Spokane County Sheriff's Office ';c©UNTj. Regional Intelligence Group a if Spokane Valley Districts i.(t IBR Classification: Counterfeiting Forgery 11G q 30 25 20 11\ I \ii, "41111)11044100 15el" I EE FCalendar 2020 S E 0 I r r = - >- w > I- ry .4 n cc UI OC u ccQ Z. J V1 w w w w a Q ec 2 = n ) CA co co UI z cc 2 D w I— w w 2 an ¢ H U > u w O Lt. w Z p 0 Year Month Count 2017 201,8 2019 Calendar 2020 January 9 18 22 22 February 11 10 13 11 March 20 24 17 14 April 20 22 13 14 May 26 21 10 10 June 15 15 14 7 July 21 15 10 10 August 14 17 13 9 September 20 14 11 October 18 11 14 November 9 20 21 December 9 14 15 Grand Total 192 201 173 97 *IBR Offense:Counterfeiting/Forgery 250 Produced: 9/14/2020 For Law Enforcement Use Only This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF. mauthorized persons pursuant to RCW 42.56.420 Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. Spokane County Sheriff's Office couJvrrs Regional Intelligence Group Q Spokane Valley Districts `<?F IBR Classification: Destruction Damage Vandalism I?i G t) 200 1 180 160 140 /00 41P IIK .116-tirill-41V4 liti 120 100 1 I —4 -2017 1 t-201s 80 1 -fir—2019 60 l Calendar 2020 40 20 0 I I r r = _, w >- H cc cc cc , Q cc U s a Z -J N w w w w a a D D D m CO to m ¢ a -, L 7 a 7 7 Z cc 7 D w H w w Q w Q a 0 a U > w LL w Z o vt Year Month Count 2017 2018 2019 Calendar 2020 January 159 146 124 113 February 148 95 67 141 March 136 121 122 105 April 173 127 144 158 May 139 142 161 118 June 143 140 133 154 July 178 141 156 146 August 149 132 144 172 September 160 155 141 October 119 _ 165 165 November 131 155 140 December 105 125 174 Grand Total 1740 1644 1671 1107 IBR Offense: Destruction/Damage/Vandalism 290 Produced: 9/14/2020 For Law Enforcement Use Only This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF. mauthorized persons pursuant to RCW 42.56.420 Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice.