The URL can be used to link to this page

2021, 07-27 Formal AGENDA SPOKANE VALLEY CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING FORMAL FORMAT Tuesday,July 27,2021 6:00 p.m. Remotely via ZOOM Meeting and In Person at 10210 E Sprague Avenue Council Requests Please Silence Your Cell Phones During Council Meeting NOTE: In response to Governor Inslee's announcement reopening Washington under the "Washington Ready" plan, members of the public may attend Spokane Valley Council meetings in-person at City Hall at the address provided above, or via Zoom at the link below. Members of the public will be allowed to comment in-person or via Zoom as described below. Public comments will only be accepted for those items noted on the agenda as"public comment opportunity." If wishing to make a comment via Zoom, comments must be received by 4:00 pm the day of the meeting. Otherwise,comments will be taken in- person at the meeting in Council Chambers,as noted on the agenda below. • Sign up to Provide Oral Public Comment at the Meeting via Calling-In • Submit Written Public Comment Prior to the Meeting • Join the Zoom WEB Meeting CALL TO ORDER INVOCATION: Pastor Isaac Hebden of The Intersection Church PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL APPROVAL OF AGENDA INTRODUCTION OF SPECIAL GUESTS AND PRESENTATIONS COMMITTEE,BOARD,LIAISON SUMMARY REPORTS MAYOR'S REPORT PROCLAMATION:National Night Out GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT OPPORTUNITY 11l: This is an opportunity for the public to speak on any subject except agenda action items,as public comments will be taken on those items where indicated. Please keep comments to matters within the jurisdiction of the City Government.This is not an opportunity for questions or discussion. Diverse points of view are welcome but please keep remarks civil. Remarks will be limited to three minutes per person. To comment via zoom: use the link above for oral or written comments as per those directions. To comment at the meeting in person: speakers may sign in to speak but it is not required.A sign-in sheet will be provided in Council Chambers.Whether in person or via zoom, speakers should indicate if they want to speak at General Public Comment Opportunity [1] or [2] and may only speak at one or the other,but not both. NEW BUSINESS: 1. Consent Agenda: Consists of items considered routine which are approved as a group. Any member of Council may ask that an item be removed from the Consent Agenda to be considered separately. Proposed Motion:I move to approve the Consent Agenda. a.Approval of Claim Vouchers on July 27,2021,Request for Council Action Form: $1,135,953.10 b.Approval of Payroll for Pay Period Ending July 15,2021:$417,131.46 Council Agenda July 27,2021 Page 1 of 2 c.Approval of July 13,2021 Council Meeting Minutes,Formal Meeting Format 2.First Reading Ordinance 21-010 Batch Text Amendments—Marty Palaniuk [no public comments] 3.Motion Consideration: Justice Assistance Grant(JAG)—Morgan Koudelka [public comment opportunity] 4.Motion Consideration: Pre-trial Services Interlocal Agreement Amendment—Morgan Koudelka [public comment opportunity] GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT OPPORTUNITY [21: This is an opportunity for the public to speak on any subject except agenda action items,as public comments will be taken on those items where indicated. Please keep comments to matters within the jurisdiction of the City Government.This is not an opportunity for questions or discussion. Diverse points of view are welcome but please keep remarks civil. Remarks will be limited to three minutes per person. To comment via zoom: use the link above for oral or written comments as per those directions. To comment at the meeting in person: speakers may sign in to speak but it is not required.A sign-in sheet will be provided in Council Chambers.Whether in person or via zoom, speakers should indicate if they want to speak at General Public Comment Opportunity [1] or[2] and may only speak at one or the other,but not both. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS: 5. Spokane Valley Library Update—John Hohman,Patrick Roewe,Mark Dailey 6. Spokane Regional Law and Justice Council Update—Cary Driskell 7.Advance Agenda—Mayor Wick INFORMATION ONLY(will not be reported or discussed): 8. Department Monthly Reports CITY MANAGER COMMENTS ADJOURNMENT Council Agenda July 27,2021 Page 2 of 2 okane Walley 1Trocfarnation 9 ationa(N fit Out Against Crime City of Spokane Vadey Wasfii 1 ton WHEREAS: National Night Out was founded in 1981 by Matt Peskin, Executive Director of the National Association of Town Watch; and was established in 1984 with funding from the Bureau of Justice Assistance, U.S. Department of Justice as a crime prevention program that emphasizes building a partnership between the police and the community; and WHEREAS: Matt Peskin's dedication to the development, maintenance, and promotion of community watch programs led to the creation of the highly successful National Night Out, which takes place annually on the first Tuesday of August; and WHEREAS: The National Night Out campaign provides an opportunity for city neighbors to take part in National Night Out along with over 38 million other neighbors across 16 thousand communities from all 50 states, U.S. territories and military bases worldwide; and WHEREAS: National Night Out is a community-building campaign that promotes police- community partnerships and neighborhood camaraderie to make our neighborhoods safer, more caring places to live and work; and WHEREAS: Neighbors in our city will be assisting the local law enforcement agency through community-building efforts as they join to support National Night Out; and WHEREAS: We support, applaud, and look forward to this annual event where neighbors can come together with police and work together to build a safer, more caring community. NOW, THEREFORE,I, Ben Wick, Mayor of the City of Spokane Valley, on behalf of the Spokane Valley City Council and the citizens of the City of Spokane Valley, do hereby proclaim Tuesday, August 3, 2021, as NATIONAL NIGHT OUT in the City of Spokane Valley, and I urge our citizens to join in the celebration of and support for National Night Out. Signed this 27th day of July, 2021. Ben Wick, Mayor CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: July 27, 2021 Department Director Approval: /1 Check all that apply: El consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Approval of the Following Vouchers: VOUCHER LIST VOUCHER NUMBERS TOTAL AMOUNT 07/07/2021 54127-54153 212,972.37 07/12/2021 54154-54175 141,860.94 07/12/2021 54176-54199 28,353.62 07/12/2021 54200 2,489.98 07/13/2021 54201-54206,wire 13376772 663,566.58 07/19/2021 54207-54230 84,713.61 07/08/2021 8931-8950 (Park refunds) 1,996.00 GRAND TOTAL: $1,135,953.10 Explanation of Fund Numbers found on Voucher Lists #001 General Fund 001.011.000.511. City Council Other Funds: 001.013.000.513. City Manager 101 —Street Fund 001.013.015.515. Legal 103 —Paths &Trails 001.016.000. Public Safety 105—Hotel/Motel Tax 001.018.013.513. Deputy City Manager 106—Solid Waste 001.018.014.514. Finance 107---PEG Fund 001.018.016.518. Human Resources 108—Affordable& Supplemental Housing Sales Tax 001.040.041. Engineering 120--CenterPlace Operating Reserve 001.040.042. Economic Development 121 —Service Level Stabilization Reserve 001.040.043. Building 122—Winter Weather Reserve 001.076.000.576. Parks &Rec—Administration 204—Debt Service 001.076.300.576. Parks & Rec-Maintenance 301 —REET 1 Capital Projects 001.076.301.571. Parks &Rec-Recreation 302—REET 2 Capital Projects 001.076.302.576. Parks & Rec-Aquatics 303—Street Capital Projects 001.076.304.575. Parks & Rec- Senior Center 309—Parks Capital Grants 001.076.305.571. Parks &Rec-CenterPlace 310---Civic Bldg. Capital Projects 001.090.000.511. General Gov't- Council related 311 —Pavement Preservation 001.090.000.514. General Gov't-Finance related 312—Capital Reserve 001.090.000.517. General Gov't-Employee supply 314—Railroad Grade Separation Projects 001.090.000.518. General Gov't- Centralized Serv. 402—Stormwater Management 001.090.000.519. General Gov't-Other Services 403 —Aquifer Protection Area 001.090.000.540. General Gov't-Transportation 501 —Equipment Rental &Replacement 001.090.000.550. General Gov't-Natural & Eco. 502—Risk Management 001.090.000.560. General Gov't-Social Services 632—Passthrough Fees &Taxes 001.090.000.594 General Gov't-Capital Outlay 001,090,000.595. General Gov't-Pavement Preser. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to approve attached list of claim vouchers. [Approved as part of the Consent Agenda, or may be removed and discussed separately.] STAFF CONTACT: Chelsie Taylor, Finance Director ATTACHMENTS: Voucher Lists • vchlist Voucher List Page: 1 07107/2021 10:49:06AM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice FundlDept Description/Account Amount 54127 7/7/2021 000150 ALLIED FIRE&SECURITY 1003553 001.076.305.575 SECURITY SERVICES:CENTERPLACE 160.66 Total: 160.66 54128 7/7/2021 004046 AMERICAN ONSITE SERVICES 403671 001.076.300.576 PORTABLE RESTOOM:CENTERPLACE 85.00 411242 001.076.300.576 PORTABLE RESTROOM:CENTERPLAC 85.00 Total: 170.00 54129 7/7/2021 002326 BATTERIES PLUS BULBS P39911957 001.076.305.575 SUPPLIES:CENTERPLACE 47.81 Total: 47.81 54130 7/7/2021 000322 CENTURYLINK 835B 6-14-2021 001.076.000.576 2021 PHONE SVCS:ACCT 509 Z14-002, 545.47 Total: 545.47 54131 7R12021 001888 COMCAST 4466 6/26/21-7/25/21 001.090.000.518 INTERNET&PHONE:CITY HALL 348.49 4668 6/17/21-7116121 001.076.305.575 INTERNET/PHONE:CENTERPLACE 409.34 Total: 757.83 54132 717/2021 000326 CONSOLIDATED IRRIGATION#19 June 2021 402.402.000.531 UTILITIES:CPW JUNE 2021 508.38 Total: 508.38 54133 7/7/2021 002604 DELL FINANCIAL SERVICES LLC 80921879 001.090.000.548 COMPUTER LEASE 001-8922117-019-I 52.66 80922054 001.090.000.548 COMPUTER LEASE;001-8922117-013 986.55 80922055 001.090.000.548 COMPUTER LEASE:001-8922117-014 142.27 80922056 001.090.000.548 COMPUTER LEASE:001-8922117-015 176.38 Total: 1,357.86 54134 717/2021 002604 DELL FINANCIAL SERVICES LLC 80921878 001.090.000.548 COMPUTER LEASE:001-8922117-018- 651.56 80922048 001.090.000.548 COMPUTER LEASE:001-8922117-007 139.58 80922049 001.090.000.548 COMPUTER LEASE:001-8922117-008 658.51 80922050 001.090.000.548 COMPUTER LEASE:001-8922117-009 368.09 80922051 001.090.000.548 COMPUTER LEASE:001-8922117-010 187.76 80922052 001.090.000.548 COMPUTER LEASE:001-8922117-011 806.78 80922053 001.090.000.548 COMPUTER LEASE:001-8922117-012 266.18 80922057 001.090.000.548 COMPUTER LEASE:001-8922117-016 409.18 80922058 001,090,000.548 COMPUTER LEASE:001-8922117-017 487.31 Total: 3,974.95 Page: 1 vchlist Voucher List Page: 2 07/07/2021 10:49:06AM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 54135 7/7/2021 007465 ELEVATIONS:A CHILDREN'S 2021#4 001.090.000.560 2021 SOC SER ECO DEV GRANT REIM 559.96 Total: 559.96 54136 7/7/2021 005046 FASTSIGNS INV-2094 001.076.305.575 BANNERS FOR CENTERPLACE 274.43 Total: 274.43 54137 7/7/2021 008138 FIRST AID SUPPLIES ONLINE 0099764 001.076.301.571 FIRST AID SUPPLIES:CENTERPLACE 227.25 Total: 227.25 54138 7/7/2021 000007 GRAINGER 9941634553 101.043.000.542 SUPPLIES:BRIDGE 21.40 Total: 21.40 54139 7f7/2021 000070 INLAND POWER&LIGHT CO June 2021 101.042.000,542 UTILITIES:PARKS AND CPW JUNE 202 444.69 Total: 444.69 54140 7/7/2021 004632 LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS 230817640 001.090.000.518 TELECOM SERVICES 1,008.04 Total: 1,008.04 54141 7/7/2021 000652 OFFICE DEPOT INC. 174179350001 001.040.041.543 OFFICE SUPPLIES:ENGINEERING/DE1 156.60 174494702001 001.040.041.543 OFFICE SUPPLIES:ENGINEERING/DEN 74.62 175074896001 001.076.000.576 OFFICE SUPPLIES:CENTERPLACE 317.52 177395819001 001.040.041.543 OFFICE SUPPLIES:ENGINEERING/DEN 55.02 178365392001 001.076.305.575 OFFICE SUPPLIES:CENTERPLACE 53.81 178367529001 001.076.305.575 OFFICE SUPPLIES:CENTERPLACE 2.98 Total: 660.55 54142 7/7/2021 001860 PLATE ELECTRIC SUPPLY 1R10575 001.076.305.575 SUPPLIES:CENTERPLACE 117.74 Total: 117.74 54143 7/7/2021 002592 PURE FILTRATION PRODUCTS 67796 001.076.305.575 SUPPLIES:CENTERPLACE 266.30 Total: 266.30 54144 7/7/2021 007730 ROYAL BUSINESS SYSTEMS INV148965 001.018.014.514 JUNE 2021 COPIER COSTS 771.73 Total: 771.73 54145 7/7/2021 000709 SENSKE LAWN&TREE CARE INC. 10794050 001.076.305.575 MISC MAINTENANCE:CENTERPLACE 1,301.36 Total: 1,301.36 Page: 2 vchlist Voucher List Page: 3 07/07/2021 10:49:06AM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 54146 7/7/2021 003231 SHERWIN WILLIAMS COMPANY 1917-8 001.076.305.575 SUPPLJES:CENTERPLACE 132.39 Total: 132.39 54147 7/7/2021 000001 SPOKANE CO TREASURER 42000896 001.016.000.554 ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES FOR JUL 22,716.93 51505885 001.016.000.523 JUNE 2021 INMATE HOUSING 138,714.15 Total: 161,431.08 54148 7/7/2021 000324 SPOKANE CO WATER DIST#3 June 2021#2 402.402.000.531 WATER CHARGES FOR JUNE 2021#2 2,231.97 Total: 2,231.97 54149 7/7/2021 000731 SPOKANE RESTAURANT EQUIP INC 108974 001.076.305.575 SUPPLIES:CENTERPLACE 7.45 108994 001.076.305.575 SUPPLIES:CENTERPLACE 11.17 Total: 18.62 54150 7/7/2021 000405 SPOKANE VALLEY PARTNERS 2021#6 FINAL 001.050.000.560 2021 SOC SER/ECO DEV GRANT REIM 3,543.09 Total: 3,543.09 54151 7/7/2021 007120 TSHIMAKAIN CREEK LABORATORY 2116902 001.076.300.576 ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING AT PARKS 25.00 Total: 25.00 54152 7/7/2021 000167 VERA WATER&POWER JUNE 2021 101.042.000.542 UTILITIES:JUNE 2021 4,332.08 Total: 4,332.08 54153 7/7/2021 000487 YMCA OF THE INLAND NW MAY 2021 001.076.302.576 OPERATING EXPENSES/MGMT FEE Mi 28,081.73 Total: 28,081.73 27 Vouchers for bank code: apbank Bank total: 212,972.37 27 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers: 212,972.37 Page: 3 vchlist Voucher List Page: 1 07/12/2021 10:09:01AM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 54154 7/12/2021 007136 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES INC 1CM9-61PF-H674 001.076.301.571 OFFICE SUPPLIES:CENTERPLACE 35.44 1Q4G-6PKF-RWLX 001.076.301.571 SUPPLIES:CENTERPLACE 36.38 Total: 71.82 54155 7/12/2021 004046 AMERICAN ONSITE SERVICES 415243 001.076.300.576 PORTABLE RESTROOM:CENTERPLAC 85.00 415245 001.076.300.576 PORTABLE RESTROOM:MIRABEAU SF 279.00 Total: 364.00 54156 7/12/2021 007718 APPLETREE 000021-596-131 001.076.305.575 ANSWERING SERVICE FOR CENTERP 45.75 Total: 45.75 54157 7/12/2021 003337 ARROW CONSTRUCTION SUPPLY INC 304968 101.042.000.542 SUPPLIES:STREET DEPT 60.74 305180 101.042.000.542 SUPPLIES:STREET 34.09 Total: 94.83 54158 7/12/2021 000918 BLUE RIBBON LINEN SUPPLY INC 0269132 001.076.305.575 LINEN SERVICE AND SUPPLY AT CENT 69.81 Total: 69.81 54159 7/12/2021 003122 CALHOUN,MARK July 2021 001.013.000.513 MONTHLY AUTO ALLOWANCE FOR 7/2 400.00 Total: 400.00 54160 7/12/2021 000326 CONSOLIDATED IRRIGATION#19 June 2021 001.076.305.575 UTILITIES:JUNE 2021 PARKS&CP 1,167.85 Total: 1,167.85 54161 7/12/2021 000246 EAST SPOKANE WATER DIST#1 June 2021 402.402.000.531 WATER CHARGES FOR JUNE 2021 4,245.29 Total: 4,245.29 54162 7/12/2021 007652 FIRE CONTROL SPRINKLER SYSTEMS 21-060821 001.076.305.575 FIRE SPRINKLER INSPECTION:GENIE 430.49 Total: 430.49 54163 7/12/2021 008107 GORDON THOMAS HONEYWELL LLP 906178 001.013.015.515 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES RENDEREI 840.00 Total: 840.00 54164 7/12/2021 000388 IRVIN WATER DIST.#6 June 2021 001.076.300.576 UTILITIES:PARKS AND CPW JUNE 202 1,793.49 Total: 1,793.49 54165 7/12/2021 001635 ISS FACILITY EVENT SERVICES 1543492 001.076.305.575 JUNE 2021 MONTHLY CLEANING-CEP 8,085.09 Page: 4 vchlist Voucher List Page: 2 07112/2021 10:09:01AM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 54165 7/12/2021 001635 001635 ISS FACILITY EVENT SERVICES (Continued) Total: 8,085.09 54166 7/12/2021 008106 MCALOON LAW PLLC 418 001.013.015.515 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 79.50 Total: 79.50 54167 7/12/2021 000132 MODERN ELECTR#C WATER CO 20295070 101.042.000.542 UTILITIES:JUNE 2021 CPW 13,103.83 Total: 13,103.83 54168 7/12/2021 000283 NRPA 93303-2021 001.076.000.576 MEMBERSHIP 2021 675.00 Total: 675.00 54169 7/12/2021 001860 PLATT ELECTRIC SUPPLY 1R98487 001.076.305.575 SUPPLIES:CENTERPLACE 136.81 1R99758 001.076.305.575 SUPPLIES:CENTERPLACE 40.21 Total: 177.02 54170 7/12/2021 005968 PRECISE MRM LLC 200-1031697 101.042.000.542 DATA PLAN 272.25 Total: 272.25 54171 7/12/2021 000709 SENSKE LAWN&TREE CARE INC. 10323371 001.076.305.575 QUARTERLY PEST CONTROL:CENTEF 353.93 10564723 001.076.305.575 QUARTERLY PEST CONTROL:CENTEF 353.93 106869/6 001.076.305.575 QUARTERLY PEST CONTROL:CENTEF 353.93 10840648 001.076.300.576 895 CONTRACT MAINTENANCE 64,898.17 8722041 001.076.305.575 QUARTERLY PEST CONTROL:CENTEF 353.60 8816486 001.076.305.575 QUARTERLY PEST CONTROL:CENTEF 353.60 9105333 001.076.305.575 QUARTERLY PEST CONTROL:CENTEF 353.93 9943319 001.076.305.575 QUARTERLY PEST CONTROL:CENTEF 353.93 Total: 67,375.02 54172 7/12/2021 004535 SHRED-IT USA LLC 8182331049 001.090.000.518 DOCUMENT DESTRUCTION 166.20 Total: 166.20 54173 7/12/2021 001903 SPOKANE TRAFFIC CONTROL INC 5993 101.042.099.542 TRAFFIC CONTROL 3,841.00 Total: 3,841.00 54174 7/12/2021 000202 SRCAA 16552 001.090.000.553 3RD QTR 2021 ASSESSMENT 37,707.50 Total: 37,707.50 54175 7/12/2021 004740 THOMSON REUTERS-WEST 844625140 001.013.015.515 WEST INFORMATION CHARGES 855.20 Page: `$ 5 vchlist Voucher List Page: 3 07/12/2021 10:09:01AM Spokane Valley • Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 54175 7/12/2021 004740 004740 THOMSON REUTERS-WEST (Continued) Total: 855.20 22 Vouchers for bank code: apbank Bank total: 141,860.94 22 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers: 141,860.94 1,the undersigned,do certify under penalty of perjury, that the materials have been furnished,the services rendered,or the labor performed as described herein and that the claim is just,due and an unpaid obligation against the City of Spokane Valley,and that I am authorized to authenticate and certify said claim. Finance Director Date Council member reviewed: Mayor Date Council Member Date Page: vch!ist Voucher List Page: 1 07/12/2021 1:04:45PM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 54176 7/12/2021 000246 EAST SPOKANE WATER DIST#1 22375 FC 402.402.000.531 FINANCE CHARGE 1.34 Total: 1.34 54177 7/12/2021 000571 CODE PUBLISHING COMPANY 70191 001.013.000.513 ELECTRONIC CODE UPDATE 377.27 Total: 377.27 54178 7/12/2021 003274 EXCHANGE PUBLISHING LLC 606535 001.040.042.558 LEGAL PUBLICATION 104.25 606537 001.040.043.558 LEGAL PUBLICATION 83.74 606538 001.013.000.513 LEGAL PUBLICATION 44.24 606539 001.040.043.558 LEGAL PUBLICATION 82.16 Total: 314.39 54179 7/12/2021 001447 FREE PRESS PUBLISHING INC 51992 001.040.042,558 LEGAL PUBLICATION 235.20 51995 001.013.000.513 LEGAL PUBLICATION 51.85 51996 001.040.043.558 LEGAL PUBLICATION 94.35 51997 001.040.043.558 LEGAL PUBLICATION 92.65 Total: 474.05 54180 7/12/2021 000240 NATL LEAGUE OF CITIES 174746 001.011.000.511 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL 2021 000200E 7,029.00 Total: 7,029.00 54181 7/12/2021 007136 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES INC 1LMK-H4KV-J3RJ 001.040.041.558 VEHICLE REPAIR&MAINT.SUPPLIES 28.30 Total: 28.30 54182 7/12/2021 003255 DAY WIRELESS SYSTEMS INV681676 101.042.000.543 TOWER RENT 216.57 Total: 216.57 54183 7/12/2021 002203 NAPAAUTO PARTS 0538-048870 001.033.000.518 VEHICLE REPAIR&MAINT SUPPLIES 16.16 Total: 16.16 54184 7/12/2021 000001 SPOKANE CO TREASURER 51505906 101.042.000.542 MAY 2021 WORK CREW 5,457.40 Total: 5,457.40 54185 7/12/2021 001660 TITAN TRUCK EQUIP CO INC 1299597 001.040.041.543 VEHICLE REPAIR&MAINTENANCE SU 222.78 Total: 222.78 54186 7/12/2021 000734 DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION RE-313-ATB10614046 101.042.000.542 REIMBURSE TRAFFIC SVCS 5,421.24 Page: `41.% 17 vchlist Voucher List Page: 2 07/12/2021 1:04:45PM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 54186 7/12/2021 000734 000734 DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION (Continued) Total: 5,421.24 54187 7/12/2021 002326 BATTERIES PLUS BULBS P39706287 001.016.016.521 SUPPLIES:PRECINCT 123.82 Total: 123.82 54188 7/12/2021 007871 EMPIRE SPRAY SERVICE INC JF062201 001.016.016.521 SUMMER SPRAY SERVICES:PRECINC 81.68 Total: 81.68 54189 7/12/2021 002975 FREEDOM SALES AND SUPPLY LLC 2021357 001.033.000.518 FLAG FOR CITY HALL 244.15 Total: 244.15 54190 7/12/2021 001635 ISS FACILITY EVENT SERVICES 1544188 001.033.000.518 TOUCHPOINT CLEANING:CITY HALL 2,207.92 Total: 2,207.92 54191 7/12/2021 007741 REFRIGERATION SUPPLIES DIST 16270838-00 001.033.000.518 SMALLTOOLSIMINOR EQUIPMENT:CI` 230.66 Total: 230.66 54192 7/12/2021 004133 ROE BACKFLOW TESTING 1318 001.016.016.521 BACKFLOW TESTING 270.00 Total: 270.00 54193 7/12/2021 007159 THE HOME DEPOT PRO 623991627 001.033.000.518 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES:CITY HALL 216.94 624256418 001.033.000.518 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES:CITY HALL -191.12 624531794 001.033.000.518 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES:CITY HALL 94.83 Total: 120.65 54194 7/12/2021 008067 TK LANDSCAPE&LAWN SVCS LLC 2153 001.033.000.518 LAWN SERVICE:PRECINCT/CITY HALL 1,911.20 Total: 1,911.20 54195 7/12/2021 007808 AMENTO GROUP INC 052153 001.000.322.518 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES:CITY HALL 2,206.00 Total: 2,206.00 54196 7/12/2021 001770 CONSOLIDATED SUPPLY CO S010347039.001 001.000.322.518 SUPPLIES:CITY HALL REPAIR 261.09 S010347039.004 001.000.322.518 SUPPLIES:CITY HALL REPAIRS 54.45 Total: 315.54 54197 7/12/2021 004110 BURKES KLEINS DKI 21-159E 001.040.043.524 CODE ENFORCEMENT ABATEMENT 971.21 Total: 971.21 Page: vchlist Voucher List Page: 3 0711212021 1:04:45PM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 54198 7/12/2021 006852 ULINE INC 134774651 001.040.043.558 OFFICE SUPPLIES:PERMIT CTR 39.54 Total: 39.54 54199 7/12/2021 003274 EXCHANGE PUBLISHING LLC 598788 309.000.314.594 ADVERTISING 72.75 Total: 72.75 24 Vouchers for bank code: apbank Bank total: 28,353.62 24 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers: 28,353.62 I,the undersigned,do certify under penalty of perjury, that the materials have been furnished,the services rendered,or the labor performed as described herein and that the claim is just,due and an unpaid obligation against the City of Spokane Valley,and that I am authorized to authenticate and certify said claim. Finance Director Date Council member reviewed: Mayor Date Council Member Date Page: vchlist Voucher List Page: 1 07/12/2021 1:21:01PM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 54200 7/12/2021 000734 DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION RE-313-ATB10514055 101.042.000.542 REIMBURSE ROADWAY MAINTENANCI 2,489.98 Total: 2,489.98 1 Vouchers for bank code: apbank Bank total: 2,489.98 1 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers: 2,489.98 I,the undersigned,do certify under penalty of perjury, that the materials have been furnished,the services rendered,or the labor performed as described herein and that the claim is just,due and an unpaid obligation against the City of Spokane Valley,and that am authorized to authenticate and certify said claim. Finance Director Date Council member reviewed: Mayor Date Council Member Date Page: vchlist Voucher List Page: 1 07/13/2021 7:46:19AM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 54201 7/13/2021 008190 ANKER,TOM EXPENSES 001.040.041.543 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 35.00 Total: 35.00 54202 7/13/2021 002615 BULLOCK,SUSAN EXPENSES 001.013.015.515 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 21.53 Total: 21.53 54203 7/13/2021 007940 DW EXCAVATING INC PAY APP 8 303.000.275.595 DW EXCAVATING BARKER ROAD PRO, 468,790.76 Total: 468,790.76 54204 7/13/2021 000307 OFFICE OF THE STATE TREASURER MAY 2021 632.000.000.589 STATE REMITTANCE 28,788.96 Total: 28,788.96 54205 7/13/2021 007133 PRUNTY,CAITLIN EXPENSES 001.013.015.515 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 79.15 Total: 79.15 54206 7/13/2021 000308 SPOKANE CO PROSECUTING ATTY MAY 2021 632.000.000.589 CRIME VICTIMS COMPENSATION REM 439.55 Total: 439.55 13376772 7/2/2021 000001 SPOKANE CO TREASURER JUNE 2021 001.016.000.512 SPOKANE COUNTY SERVICES 165,411.63 Total: 165,411.63 7 Vouchers for bank code: apbank Bank total: 563,566.58 7 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers: 663,566.58 Page: !9, 1/ Sarr of okane FINANCE �ce Director *Valley 10210 E Sprague Avenue + Spokane Valley WA 99206 Phone: (509)720-5000 ♦ Fax: (509)720-5075 ♦ www.spokanevalley.org Memorandum To: Chelsie Taylor, Finance Director From: Karla White, Accounting Technician Date: July 20, 2021 Re: Vouchers 54207-54230 On Monday, July 19, 2021, I processed a check run and erroneously selected the wrong date (July 12, 2021) when printing the vouchers, so they are dated July 12, 2021 instead of July 19, 2021. However, the voucher listing is dated July 19, 2021, which is correct. vchlist Voucher List Page: 1 07/19/2021 3:29:38PM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 54207 7/12/2021 000030 AVISTA June 2021 001.076.302.576 UTILITIES:PARKS MASTERAVISTAJUf 11,314.12 June 2021 101.042.000.542 UTILITIES:CPW MASTER AVISTA JUNE 24,007.98 Total: 35,322.10 54208 7/12/2021 000508 CONOCOPHILLIPS FLEET 72591434 001.040.043.558 JUNE2021 FLEET FUEL BILL 1,958.83 Total: 1,958.83 54209 7/12/2021 002259 MENKE JACKSON BEYER LLP 462 6-30-2021 001.013.015.515 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 92.00 492 6-30-2021 001.013.015.515 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 4,418.40 Total: 4,510.40 54210 7/12/2021 000132 MODERN ELECTRIC WATER CO 20295071 001.076.302.576 UTILITIES:JUNE 2021 PARKS 5,471.85 Total: 5,471.85 54211 7/12/2021 002203 NAPAAUTO PARTS 0538-051657 101.042.000.542 SMALL TOOLS/MINOR EQUIPMENT 85.98 0538-052736 101.042.000.542 VEHICLE REPAIR&MAINT SUPPLIES 17.35 0538-054144 101.042.000.543 SUPPLIES:STREET 11.31 0538-055113 101.042.000.542 VEHICLE REPAIR&MAINTENANCE SU 24.52 Total: 139.16 54212 7/12/2021 000662 NAT'L BARRICADE&SIGN CO 208136 001.040.041.543 SAFETY SUPPLIES 90.39 Total: 90.39 54213 7/12/2021 001546 NORCO INC 32518853 101.042.000.542 SUPPLIES:STREET DEPT 47.96 Total: 47.96 54214 7/12/2021 003090 NORTH 40 OUTFITTERS 101698/3 101.042.000.542 SMALL TOOLS/MINOR EQUIPMENT 21.77 Total: 21.77 54215 7/12/2021 008135 OILWORX OW 112240 501.000.000.548 WASTE OIL COLLECTION 25.00 Total: 25.00 54216 7/12/2021 004621 OREILLYAUTOMOTIVE STORES INC 2862-101273 001,040,041.558 VEHICLE REPAIR&MAINT SUPPLIES 85.24 2862-101354 101.042.000.542 SMALL TOOLS/MINOR EQUIPMENT 61.52 2862-103089 101.042.000.542 VEHICLE REPAIR&MAINT.SUPPLIES 70.92 2862-103270 001.040.041.543 VEHICLE REPAIR&MAINT.SUPPLIES 104.21 2862-104420 001.040.041.543 VEHICLE REPAIR&MAINT.SUPPLIES 43.55 Page: 3 vchlist Voucher List Page: 2 07/19/2021 3:29:38PM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 54216 7/12/2021 004621 OREILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORES INC (Continued) 2862-104489 001.040.041.558 VEHICLE REPAIR&MAINT.SUPPLIES 20.45 2862-106965 001.040.043.558 VEHICLE REPAIR&MAINT.SUPPLIES 49.16 2862-107119 501.000.000.548 VEHICLE REPAIR&MAINT SUPPLIES 130.67 2862-108735 402.402.000.531 VEHICLE REPAIR&MAINT.SUPPLIES 85.88 Total: 651.60 54217 7/12/2021 005109 PICTOMETRY INTERNATIONAL CORP US429473 402.402.000.531 PICTOMETRY CONNECT RENEWAL 1,197.90 Total: 1,197.90 54218 7/12/2021 000709 SENSKE LAWN&TREE CARE INC. 10840681 101.042.000.542 895 CONTRACT MAINTENANCE 531.43 Total: 531.43 54219 7/12/2021 005012 SPOKANE CO ENVIRONMENTAL JULY 2021 001.076.300.576 SPOKANE CO SEWER CHARGES JULY 1,397.97 Total: 1,397.97 54220 7/12/2021 000090 SPOKANE CO INFO SYSTEMS 50320675 001.040.043.558 COUNTY IT SUPPORT:JUNE 2021 15,651.15 Total: 15,651.15 54221 7/12/2021 000001 SPOKANE CO TREASURER 51505942 101.042.000.542 JUNE 2021 WORK CREW 5,877.20 Total: 5,877.20 54222 7/12/2021 000324 SPOKANE CO WATER DIST#3 July 2021#1 402.402.000.531 WATER CHARGES FOR JULY 2021#1 1,459.66 Total: 1,459.66 54223 7/12/2021 002540 SPOKANE HOUSE OF HOSE INC. 884139 101.000.000.542 VEHICLE REPAIR&MAINT SUPPLIES 53.50 Total: 53.50 54224 7/12/2021 004099 SPOKANE VALLEY ACE HARDWARE 28498 101.042.000.542 SMALL TOOLS/MINOR EQUIPMENT 47.35 Total: 47.35 54225 7/12/2021 000257 STATE AUDITOR'S OFFICE L143466 001.090.000.514 SAO AUDIT OF 2020 4,128.15 Total: 4,128.15 54226 7/12/2021 001969 SUNSHINE DISPOSAL 1771900 101.042.000.542 TRANSFER STATION JUNE 2021 600.99 Total: 600.99 54227 7/12/2021 006846 US LINEN&UNIFORM INC 2748890 101.042.000.543 SUPPLIES:MAINTENANCE SHOP 22.31 Page: ‘2. 1Lf vchlist Voucher List Page: 3 0711912021 3:29:38PM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 54227 7/12/2021 006846 US LINEN&UNIFORM INC (Continued) 2752657 101.042.000.543 SUPPLIES:MAINTENANCE SHOP 31.60 2756333 101.042.000.543 SUPPLIES:MAINTENANCE SHOP 18.49 2760095 101.042.000.543 SUPPLIES:MAINTENANCE SHOP 31.60 2763760 101.042.000.543 SUPPLIES:MAINTENANCE SHOP 18.49 Total: 122.49 54228 7/12/2021 000087 VERIZON WIRELESS 9882221686 001.076.302.576 JUNE 2021 CELL PHONE/DEVICE CHAT 3,071.01 Total: 3,071.01 54229 7/12/2021 008134 WINSTON&CASHATT,LAWYERS PS 95194 001.013.015.515 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,174.50 Total: 1,174.50 54230 7/12/2021 001885 ZAYO GROUP LLC 2021070003578 001.090.000.518 INTERNET SERVICES 287.22 2021070005522 001.090.000.518 INTERNET SERVICES 626.70 2021070025710 001.090.000.518 INTERNET SERVICES 247.33 Total: 1,161.25 24 Vouchers for bank code: apbank Bank total: 84,713.61 24 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers: 84,713.61 Page: "-5.- I , vchlist Voucher List Page: 1 07/08/2021 10:13:15AM Spokane Valley Bank code: pk-ref Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept DescriptionlAccount Amount 8931 7/8/2021 008172 BENNEfT,RACHEL PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 REFUND:VALLEY MISSION SWIM PARC 80.00 Total: 80.00 8932 7/8/2021 008173 CASEY,REBECCA PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND:DISCOVERY PLAYC 75.00 Total: 75.00 8933 7/8/2021 008174 CENTRAL VALLEY WRESTING CLUB PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND:MIRABEAU MEADC 75.00 Total: 75.00 8934 7/8/2021 008175 CLARK,KASEY PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND:GREENACRES PAF 75.00 Total: 75.00 8935 7/11/2021 008176 FETTERS,TARA PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND:MIRABEAU MEADC 75.00 Total: 75.00 8936 7/8/2021 008177 GODDARD,KRISTINA PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 SUMMER DAY CAMP WK 1 REFUND 468.00 Total: 468.00 8937 7/8/2021 008178 HEGARTY,RENAE PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 SUMMER DAY CAMP WK 3 REFUND 156.00 Total: 156.00 8938 7/8/2021 008180 HOLLAND,MICAIAH PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND:DISCOVERY PLAY( 75.00 Total: 75.00 8939 7/8/2021 008189 MJELDE,SARA PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND:DISCOVERY PLAYC 75.00 Total: 75.00 8940 7/8/2021 008181 PINKERTON,JILLIAN PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND:DISCOVERY PLAYC 75.00 Total: 75.00 8941 7/8/2021 004270 PRIMAKOVA,DARYA PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND:VALLEY MISSION 75.00 Total: 75.00 8942 7/8/2021 008182 RAY,LISA PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND:VALLEY MISSION 75.00 Total: 75.00 8943 7/8/2021 007297 ROBERTS.DESTINY PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND:GREENACRES 75.00 Page: -1` 1 & vchlist Voucher List Page: 2 07/0812021 10:13:15AM Spokane Valley Bank code: pk-ref Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept DescriptionlAccount Amount 8943 7/812021 007297 007297 ROBERTS,DESTINY (Continued) Total: 75.00 8944 7/812021 008183 SHOVELL,HEIDI PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 REFUND VALLEY MISSION PRESCHOC 80.00 Total: 80.00 8945 7/8/2021 008184 SLOAN.TANYA PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND:MIRABEAU MEADC 75.00 Total: 75.00 8946 7/8/2021 008185 STAMPER,BEVERLY PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND:VALLEY MISSION 82.00 Total: 82.00 8947 7/8/2021 008179 THE HOBNAILERS INC PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND:MIRABEAU MEADC 75.00 Total: 75.00 8948 7/8/2021 008186 VANDERWOLF,SELENA PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND:DISCOVERY PLAY( 75.00 Total: 75.00 8949 7/812021 008187 VEITENHEIMER,KIMBERLY PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 REFUND:VALLEY MISSION PRESCHO( 80.00 Total: 80.00 8950 7/8/2021 008188 WARREN,CHARLIE PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND:EDGECLIFF 75.00 Total: 75.00 20 Vouchers for bank code: pk-ref Bank total: 1,996.00 20 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers: 1,996.00 Page: '11 /7 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: July 20, 2021 Department Director Approval: Item: Check all that apply: ® consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Payroll for Pay Period Ending July 15, 2021 GOVERNING LEGISLATION: PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: BACKGROUND: BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Employees Total Gross: $ 351,128.56 $351,128.56 Benefits: $ 66,002.90 $ 66,002.90 Total payroll $ 417,131.46 $417,131.46 RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to Approve above payroll. [Approved as part of the Consent Agenda, or may be removed and discussed separately.] STAFF CONTACT: Raba Nimri DRAFT MINUTES City of Spokane Valley City Council Regular Formal Meeting Tuesday,July 13,2021 Mayor Wick called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. The meeting was held in City Hall with Council,staff and the public participating in person and remotely via Zoom meeting. Attendance: Councilmembers Staff Ben Wick,Mayor Mark Calhoun,City Manager Brandi Peetz,Deputy Mayor John Hohman,Deputy City Manager Pam Haley, Councilmember Cary Driskell, City Attorney Tim Hattenburg Councilmember Erik Lamb,Deputy City Attorney Rod Higgins, Councilmember Dave Ellis,Police Chief Linda Thompson,Councilmember Chelsie Taylor,Finance Director Arne Woodard, Councilmember Bill Helbig,City Engineer Jerremy Clark, Sr. Traffic Engineer Marty Palaniuk,Planner Jenny Nickerson,Building Official Christine Bainbridge,City Clerk INVOCATION: Pastor Manuel Denning of Fountain Ministries gave the invocation. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Members from Girl Scout Troop #2057 led Council, staff, and the audience in the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL: City Clerk Bainbridge called the roll; all Councilmembers were present. APPROVAL OF AMENDED AGENDA: It was moved by Deputy Mayor Peetz, seconded and unanimously agreed to approve the amended agenda. INTRODUCTION OF SPECIAL GUESTS AND PRESENTATIONS: n/a COMMITTEE,BOARD,LIAISON SUMMARY REPORTS Councilmember Thompson:reported that she attended the Veterans Stand Down at the downtown Salvation Army, which she said included useful tools for everyone, including a bag which had in it, among other things,a bandana with the Veterans Association phone number; said she attended a NLC(National League of Cities) listening session with young adult leaders who discussed some of the various aspects of life that impact a young adult's success; attended an AWC (Association of Washington Cities) ad hoc committee on equity, inclusion and diversity; met with the SRTC (Spokane Regional Transportation Council)where she noted prioritized projects included three from our City; attended the NLC Summer Institute on public safety and crime prevention, said they had a pre-meeting about that and that she is on a committee for alternatives for justice systems working on prevention and reducing the racial disproportionality. Councilmember Higgins: said he attended the Regional Clean Air Committee and that they discussed that this fire season is looking like it will be very severe, and he cautioned people to keep their air conditioner filters clean. Councilmember Haley: said she attended the Continuum of Care Board meeting where they went further into the Point in Time count to find out why people are homeless; said there are some disturbing numbers as homelessness is trending up by about 33%a year;mentioned the federal grant which gives every county the opportunity to choose one project which will be determined by choosing the best project in each county; she mentioned there is no place to transposition people when they are ready to get out of a shelter as the apartment vacancy rate is extremely low; said the STA (Spokane Transit Authority) Board approved a Council Meeting Minutes,Formal:07-13-2021 Page 1 of 4 Approved by Council: DRAFT contract to install the high performance transit amenities,and she mentioned sales tax revenue is still going strong. Deputy Mayor Peetz: said all Councilmembers attended the Browns Park ribbon cutting, which was very well attended despite the heat,and that one of the speakers included Gary Brown,whose father donated the property; said she attended the Government Action Committee meeting where City Engineer Adam Jackson gave a great presentation on the Street Sustainability Committee; went to the Transportation Committee meeting, and said the three main goals they will be working on for this year include development of a PR campaign to help the public opinion on infrastructure and to educate people on why transportation is so important, and the advocacy effort going forward to make sure we are proactive, and to work with law makers to find sustainable funding. Councilmember Hattenburg: said he also attended the Veterans Stand Down and was equally amazed at the available resources;said he attended the STA performance development meeting and mentioned that Rt 90 is one of their highest performing routes. Councilmember Woodard: said he also attended the Browns Park ribbon cutting and that this is a remarkable park, and he extended thanks to the Parks Department and to the City's PIO for putting together a great program; said it was very well attended and kids were everywhere. MAYOR'S REPORT Mayor Wick reported that he too found the Browns Park ribbon cutting a very successful event and that the park accommodates kids of all abilities; said he attended the SRTC meeting and that they appointed a new executive director who starts work mid-August; said they also established a deputy director position; and he mentioned the regional priorities previously brought up by Councilmember Thompson; he spoke about upcoming legislative sessions with the possibility of a special session in October to focus on transportation; said he and others met with State Representative Fey for a tour of our grade separation projects, and he spoke about some of our legislative priorities; mentioned that the County hired an architect to look at the stadium as there are proposed changes to the stadium master plan, switching the stadium from a short to a long season, adding that the stadium wasn't originally designed for that; said he met with the regional homelessness group to discuss priorities; that the Covid recovery group was held with mayors and the County Commissioners to talk about how to respond to Covid in a coordinated fashion,and said today was the last meeting as they relinquished the topic back to the Board of Health as this moves from a pandemic to an epidemic; and he also mentioned the Farmers Market,held Friday evenings at CenterPlace. PROCLAMATIONS: n/a GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT OPPORTUNITY Ill: After Mayor Wick read the process for giving public comments, it was noted we had one request to speak during this public comment opportunity, however,the speaker apparently wasn't signed into the zoom meeting.Mayor Wick opened the floor to in- person speakers. Mr. Dan Allison, Spokane Valley: mentioned the passing of Gene Strunk; also noted that parking on the Barker Road Bridge doesn't appear to be wide enough to accommodate parking and to also have a safe view and passage for those walking or on bicyclers on the bike lane going north. Mr. Bob West, Spokane Valley: said it has come to his attention there are a lot of untruths being spoken about our Police Department; said that according to a nationally recognized data driven organization, we rank above the national average for the best place to live, and from a crime standpoint, said they got their analysis from an FBI Uniform Crime Reporting System and other factors; said the false narratives are without facts and are being used for personal gain; said we got an overall rating of a B,and a C+for crime and safety; he mentioned some Spokane Valley Police Department recent accomplishments such as live streaming for 911 calls; said it is time for those in our community who are making these divisive and misplaced truths to start giving credit where credit is due; said that if they are in a leadership role and are going to complain. . . At this point Mayor Wick asked Mr. West to stop speaking as this feels too much Council Meeting Minutes,Formal:07-13-2021 Page 2 of 4 Approved by Council: DRAFT like a campaign-related issue, and the Mayor asked Mr. West to keep the focus on non-campaign related topics. Mr. John Harding, Spokane Valley: asked what is the definition of city business; said he hopes it includes citizens' rights to have a valid vote; said anything manmade can be changed and in the case of machines,it has been proven the machines can be manipulated,and he suggested we have an audit after the election. Ms.Nina Fluegal, Spokane Valley: mentioned the high weeds, and possible noxious weeds on Appleway Trail; said it was a nice job developing Browns Park,but suggested having slip strips on all splash pads for all the parks; and she asked about the status of a proposed skate park. Mr. Mark Small, Spokane Valley: mentioned he had an accident recently at Flora and Broadway and said he had a nice conversation with the officer, who mentioned that officers are being directed not to pursue people or get involved in dangerous situations; and said he hopes they can continue to do their jobs and protect the public. 1.PUBLIC HEARING:Traffic Impact Fee Studies:Mirabeau&N.Pines Subareas—Bill Helbig,Jerremy Clark Mayor Wick opened the public hearing at 6:38 p.m. City Engineer Helbig went over the background of the fee rate studies and of the need for a public hearing, followed by Mr. Clark pointing out on the map, the study intersections, existing and future levels of service; he also went over the fair share analysis and potential funding. Mayor Wick opened the floor to public comments. There were no comments from the in-person audience. One person signed up to speak via zoom. Ms. Barb Howard, Spokane Valley: spoke about doing traffic studies from 2019 and talked about much more development and apartments are going to be built along the corridor. Just prior to closing the public hearing, Mayor Wick asked for any further public comments from the floor.Ms.Nina Fluegal,Spokane Valley: asked about the fee and whether it was a one-time fee or annual.Mayor Wick explained that this is an opportunity to comment and not dialogue. There were no other public comments, and at Mayor Wick's request,Mr. Clark explained the definition of an impact fee and how they are calculated, and that they are paid at the time of the building permit.Mayor Wick closed the public hearing at 6:51 p.m. 2. First Reading Proposed Ordinance 21-008 Adopting Traffic Impact Fee Studies—Bill Helbig, Jerremy Clark. After City Clerk Bainbridge read the ordinance title, it was moved by Councilmember Woodard and seconded, to suspend the rules and approve Ordinance No. 21-008, adopting the Transportation Impact Fee Rate Study and underlying traffic studies, as proposed. Mr.Helbig reiterated that this ordinance adopts the studies. Vote by acclamation: in favor: unanimous. Opposed: none. Motion carried. NEW BUSINESS: 3. Consent Agenda: Consists of items considered routine which are approved as a group. Any member of Council may ask that an item be removed from the Consent Agenda to be considered separately. Proposed Motion:I move to approve the Consent Agenda. a.Approval of Claim Vouchers on July 13,2021,Request for Council Action Form: $4,530,305.32 b.Approval of Payroll for Pay Period Ending June 30,2021: $575,435.53 c.Approval of June 15,2021 Council Meeting Minutes, Special Meeting Budget Workshop d.Approval of June 22,2021 Council Meeting Minutes,Formal Format e.Approval of June 29,2021 Council Meeting Minutes, Special Meeting,Executive Session f.Approval of June 29,2021 Council Meeting Minutes, Study Session Format g.Approval of July 6,2021 Council Meeting Minutes, Study Session Format It was moved by Deputy Mayor Peetz, seconded and unanimously agreed to approve the Consent Agenda. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT OPPORTUNITY 121: There were no public comments offered in- person, and no one signed up to speak viz zoom. Council Meeting Minutes,Formal:07-13-2021 Page 3 of 4 Approved by Council: DRAFT ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS: 4.Batch Text Amendments—Marty Palaniuk,Jenny Nickerson Via his PowerPoint presentation,Mr.Palaniuk explained that the purpose of the batch code text amendment is to prohibit cargo shipping containers as an accessory use in all residential zones, including the fairly newly created R-4 zoning districts as well as changes to SVMC (Spokane Valley Municipal Code) Title 19.He noted the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing and deliberations,and they voted seven to zero to recommend to Council that CTA-2021-0001 be approved. After brief discussion,there were no objections from Council to moving this forward for a first reading. Ms. Nickerson added that during the Planning Commission meeting, at least one Commissioner expressed some interest in exploring this topic further. Mr. Hohman said they have seen at least up north, a project that used a shipping container as a coffee stand,and said we could potentially see this as a request in residential and commercial areas.Mayor Wick asked Council if they wanted to hear more on this topic and there was no interest expressed in pursuing that further. 5.American Rescue Plan Act—Chelsie Taylor,Erik Lamb Deputy City Attorney Lamb explained about the American Rescue Plan Act(ARPA),which the President signed into law on March 11,2021;he said that the ARPA provides funding for a wide variety of purposes including direct assistance to small businesses,for homeless and affordable housing purposes, and to state and local governments; said that we will receive approximately $16 million from the ARPA established Coronavirus Local Fiscal Recovery Fund (CLFR),and that the Department of Treasury will distribute the funds in two tranches: one this summer and the second in the summer of 2022. Via his PowerPoint, Mr. Lamb also explained that this funding is for expenses incurred between March 3,2021 and December 31, 2024; and he went over the four primary categories of eligible uses. Councilmember Thompson asked if we could hire someone to coordinate this program and Mr.Lamb said that ARPA can be used to administer the funds. Mr. Calhoun said that he likes that idea and that ARPA is complex and additional assistance would be helpful. 6.Advance Agenda—Mayor Wick Deputy Mayor Peetz asked about the slip strips for the splash pads, and Mr. Calhoun said he will follow up with Mr.Bottelli. CITY MANAGER COMMENTS: City Manager Calhoun mentioned there are two future Central Valley School Dedications,one of which is Tuesday,August 31 at 6 pm,which is the time of our Council meetings, and he sked if Council wanted to cancel that meeting to attend the dedication;he reminded Council that we will also be cancelling the August 3 meeting so Councilmembers can participate in National Night Out. After brief discussion Councilmember Thompson suggested having one or two Councilmembers attend the dedication, and the remainder of Councilmembers seemed to agree with that idea. Mr. Calhoun said we will hold the Council meeting as usual on August 31,2021. 7. Executive Session [RCW 42.30.110(1)(b)]: Acquisition of real estate It was moved by Deputy Mayor Peetz, seconded and unanimously agreed to adjourn into executive session for approximately 30 minutes to discuss acquisition of real estate, and that no action is anticipated upon return to open session. Council adjourned into executive session at 7:40 p.m. At 8:05 p.m. Mayor Wick declared Council out of executive session, at which time it was moved by Deputy Mayor Peetz, seconded and unanimously agreed to adjourn. ATTEST: Ben Wick,Mayor Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Council Meeting Minutes,Formal:07-13-2021 Page 4 of 4 Approved by Council: CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: July 27, 2021 Department Director Approval: ❑ Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ® new business ❑public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: First Reading Ordinance No. 21-010, Batch Code Text Amendments GOVERNING LEGISLATION: SVMC 17.80.150, SVMC 19.30.040, and RCW 36.70A.106. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: July 13, 2021 Administrative Report BACKGROUND: CTA-2021-0001 is a batch code text amendment to relocate the regulations governing cargo containers from the Alternative Residential Options section of the code to the Supplemental Use Regulations section, and add a reference to the R-4 zone in applicable sections of the zoning code that were intended to address all residential zones. Cargo containers: The location of the cargo shipping container provision within the development standards for accessory dwelling units (ADU) is "out of place." The intent of the code is to prohibit cargo shipping containers in residential zones as an accessory use. The current code location leads to ambiguity as to whether the provision applies to cargo shipping containers throughout all residential zones or only to cargo shipping containers as an ADU. The proposed amendment will move the provision to the section of the code that provides supplemental regulations applicable to accessory structures in ALL residential zones and will clarify that shipping containers are not permitted as an accessory structure to a residential use in residential zones. R-4 Zone: In 2020 the Spokane Valley City Council adopted comprehensive plan amendment CPA-2020- 0007 by ordinance #20-008, creating a new R-4 zoning district and making changes to Title 19, Zoning Regulations. The amendment added development standards for the new R-4 zoning district that had application in various sections. Subsequently it was found that several sections relevant to all residential zones needed clarification to conform to the original R-4 amendment. The proposed amendment will include the R-4 zone in sections related to battery charging stations, transitional regulations, adult uses, and marijuana uses. The Planning Commission (Commission) conducted a study session on the proposed CTA at the May 27, 2021, meeting. On June 10, 2021, the Commission conducted a public hearing and deliberations. At that meeting, the Commission voted 7-0 to recommend to the City Council that CTA-2021-0001 be approved. On June 24, 2021 the Commission adopted Findings and Recommendation. City Council received an administrative report on July 13, 2021 and consented to advance the proposed amendment to a first Ordinance reading OPTIONS: Move to advance Ordinance No. 21-010 to a second reading with or without further amendments; or take other action deemed appropriate. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to advance Ordinance No. 21-010 to a second reading as proposed. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: N/A STAFF CONTACT: Martin Palaniuk, Planner, Community and Public Works Dept. ATTACHMENTS: 1. PowerPoint Presentation 2. Draft Ordinance No. 21-010 3. Planning Commission's Findings of Fact and Recommendation 4. Planning Commission Meeting Minutes: 5/27/2021, 6/10/2021 and 6/24/2021 5. Staff Report CTA-2021-0001 s1j'o' s Valley • Batch Amendment CTA-2021 -0001 Ordinance 21 - 01 0, 15Y Reading City Council Meeting July 27, 2021 Code Text Amendment - Overview 2 ❑ Cargo Shipping Container Issue: Regulation resides in Alternative Residential Development Options - ADU section Solution: Move to Supplemental Use Regulations - Residential ❑ R-4 Zoning District CPA-2020-0007 established R-4 zoning district Issue: Various sections of Title 19 apply to all residential zones, but the R-4 zone was not added Solution: Add R-4 to sections consistent with the residential zones. 71. No new regulatory requirements are added Application Processing — Next Steps •k%o ''e09 �� O• Study Session Administrative • '� �Q' •�� May 27, 2021 Report �'k •�� O,L'y O� Cr July 13, 2021 eic fie, ANT �'1, C Public Hearing J� St Q 0'� ati �� June 10, 2021 CEO 1 Ordinance • Q e° e * • a Reading - July 27, 202 -, (4. �. �O Q •Finding & 2nd Ordinance Recommendation Reading - TBD June 24, 2021 ,or. Yli Draft CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY SPOKANE COUNTY,WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO.21-010 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON AMENDING SECTIONS OF TITLE 19 OF THE SPOKANE VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE RELATED TO CARGO SHIPPING CONTAINERS, THE ADDITION OF THE R-4 ZONING DISTRICT IN SECTIONS RELEVANT TO ALL RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS, AND OTHER MATTERS RELATING THERETO. WHEREAS,the City of Spokane Valley(City)previously adopted Title 19 of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code(SVMC)relating to zoning and land use regulations,and has made subsequent amendments from time-to-time as appropriate; and WHEREAS, such regulations are authorized pursuant to chapter 36.70A RCW; and WHEREAS, City staff have proposed an amendment to the SVMC to amend chapters 19.40 and 19.65 SVMC to remove regulations pertaining to cargo shipping containers from the Alternative Residential Development Options—Accessory Dwelling Units section of the code and move it to the Supplement Use Regulations — Residential — Accessory Structures section of the code to clarify that such prohibition is generally applicable; and WHEREAS,City staff have proposed an amendment to the SVMC to amend chapters 19.65, 19.70, 19.75, 19.80, and 19.85 SVMC to add the R-4 zoning district to sections of the code that are intended to apply to all residential zoning districts; and WHEREAS,pursuant to RCW 36.70A.106, ,the Washington State Department of Commerce was notified on May 6, 2021, thereby providing a notice of intent to adopt amendments to Spokane Valley development regulations; and WHEREAS, on May 21 and 28, 2021, notice of the Planning Commission (Commission) public hearing was published in the Valley News Herald; and WHEREAS,on May 27,2021,the Commission held a study session; and WHEREAS, on June 10, 2021, the Commission held a public hearing, received evidence, information,public testimony, and a staff report with a recommendation,followed by deliberations; and WHEREAS,on June 24,2021,the Commission approved the findings and recommended that City Council adopt the amendments as proposed by staff; and WHEREAS,on July 13,2021,City Council reviewed the proposed amendments and Commission Findings and Recommendations; and WHEREAS, on July 27, 2021, City Council considered a first ordinance reading to adopt the proposed amendments; and WHEREAS,the amendments set forth below are consistent with the goals and policies of the City's Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, chapters 19.40, 19.65, 19.70, 19.75, 19.80, and 19.85 SVMC as amended, bear a substantial relation to the public health, safety,welfare and protection of the environment. Ordinance 21-010—Batch Text Amendment Page 1 of 13 Draft NOW,THEREFORE,the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley ordains as follows: Section 1. Purpose. The purpose of this Ordinance is to provide general clarification amendments to Title 19 of the SVMC. Specifically,the purpose is to move regulatory standards for cargo shipping containers from SVMC 19.40.030-Accessory dwelling units to SVMC 19.65.130—Residential, in order to address cargo containers as a residential accessory structure,and to add the"R-4 zoning district" throughout Title 19 SVMC to achieve consistency with the prior adoption of the R-4 zoning district as a new zone created in 2020 pursuant to Ordinance Nos. 20-008 and 20-009. Section 2. Findings and Conclusions. The City Council acknowledges that the Planning Commission conducted appropriate investigation and study, held a public hearing on the proposed amendments and recommends approval of the amendments. The City Council has read and considered the Planning Commission's findings. The City Council hereby makes the following findings: A. Growth Management Act Policies - Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA) provides that each city shall adopt a comprehensive land use plan and development regulations that are consistent with and implement the comprehensive plan. B. City of Spokane Valley Goals and Policies-The City of Spokane Valley has adopted goals and policies consistent with the GMA and adopted County-Wide Planning Policies, set forth below. Goal LU-G4: Ensure that land use plans, regulations, review processes, and infrastructure improvements support economic growth and vitality. Policy LU-P5: Ensure compatibility between adjacent residential and commercial or industrial uses. Policy LU-P7: Protect residential neighborhoods from incompatible land uses and adverse impacts associated with transportation corridors. Policy LU-P9: Provide supportive regulations for new and innovative development types on commercial,industrial,and mixed-use land. C. Conclusions 1. The proposed amendments bear a substantial relation to public health,safety, welfare and protection of the environment. The amendments ensure that the transitional regulations are applied to all instances in which non-residential development occurs adjacent to residential development in the R-4 zone and ensures transportation, adult and marijuana use regulations will be properly applied in the R-4 zone. The amendments additionally clarify that cargo shipping containers are not allowed generally in residential zones as accessory uses to protect the quality and character of residential neighborhoods. 2. The proposed City-initiated Code text amendments are consistent with the City's adopted Comprehensive Plan and the approval criteria pursuant to SVMC 17.80.150(F). Section 3. Amendment. Chapter 19.40 SVMC is hereby amended as follows: 19.40.030 Development standards—Accessory dwelling units. Ordinance 21-010—Batch Text Amendment Page 2 of 13 Draft A. Site. 1.An ADU may be developed in conjunction with either an existing or new primary dwelling unit; 2. One ADU,attached or detached,is allowed per lot; and 3. One off-street parking space for the ADU is required in addition to the off-street parking required for the primary dwelling unit. B. Building. 1. The ADU shall be designed to meet the appearance of a single-family residence and shall be the same or visually match the primary dwelling unit in the type, size, and placement of the following: a.Exterior finish materials; b. Roof pitch; c.Trim; and d. Windows,in proportion(relationship of width to height) and orientation(horizontal or vertical); 2. The entrance to an attached ADU shall be located on the side or in the rear of the structure or in such a manner as to be unobtrusive in appearance when viewed from the front of the street. Only one entrance may be located on the facade of the primary dwelling unit in order to maintain the appearance of a single-family residence; 3. The ADU shall not exceed 50 percent of the habitable square footage of the primary dwelling unit,nor be less than 300 square feet; 4. The footprint of the ADU shall not exceed 10 percent of the lot area or 1,000 square feet, whichever is greater; and 5. The ADU unit shall not have more than two bedrooms. C.Additional Development Standards for ADUs. 1.ADUs shall be located behind the front building setback line and placed on a permanent foundation; 2.ADUs shall preserve all side yard and rear yard setbacks for a dwelling unit pursuant to Table 19.70-1; 3.ADUs shall not be allowed on lots containing a duplex,multifamily dwelling,or accessory apartment contained within the principal structure; and 4. Existing detached accessory structures may be converted into detached ADUs;provided,that all development standards and criteria are met,including side yard and rear yard setbacks. D. Other. 1. The owner, as established by the titleholder, shall occupy either the primary dwelling unit or the ADU as their permanent residence for six months or more of the calendar year and at no time receive rent for the owner-occupied unit.The application for the ADU shall include a letter from Ordinance 21-010—Batch Text Amendment Page 3 of 13 Draft the owner affirming that one legal titleholder lives in either unit,meeting the requirement of owner occupancy. 2. Prior to issuance of occupancy,a deed restriction shall be recorded with the Spokane County auditor to indicate the presence of an ADU,the requirement of owner occupancy, and other standards for maintaining the unit as described in the SVMC. 3. Home businesses are prohibited in the ADU. 4.Approval of an ADU may be revoked if the ADU is no longer in compliance with the development standards and criteria outlined in the SVMC. 5. The owner may cancel an ADU's registration by filing a letter with Spokane County auditor. The ADU may also be cancelled as a result of an enforcement action. 6. Cargo shipping containers and similar enclosures are not a permitted accessory structure in any residential zoning district. Section 4. Amendment. Chapter 19.65 SVMC is hereby amended as follows: 19.65.130 Residential. A. Accessory Structures. 1. The combined building footprint of all accessory permanent structures in residential zoning districts shall be: a. 4—Up to 1,000 square feet for parcels up to 10,000 square feet in size; or b. 2-Up to 10 percent of the lot size for parcels greater than 10,000 square feet in size. 2. Cargo shipping containers and similar enclosures are not a permitted accessory structure in any residential zoning district. B.Dwelling,Accessory Units.Accessory dwelling units shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 19.40 SVMC,Alternative Residential Development Options. C. Dwelling,Caretaker's Residence.A caretaker's residence is limited to custodial,maintenance, management,or security of a commercial property and is only allowed accessory to another permitted use on site. D. Dwelling,Cottages. Cottages shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 19.40 SVMC, Alternative Residential Development Options. E. Dwelling,Duplex. Duplex dwelling units shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 19.40 SVMC, Alternative Residential Development Options. F.Dwelling,Industrial Accessory Dwelling Units. Industrial accessory dwelling units shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 19.40 SVMC,Alternative Residential Development Options. G. Dwelling,Townhouse. Townhouse dwelling units shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 19.40 SVMC,Alternative Residential Development Options. H.Manufactured Homes on Individual Lots.Manufactured homes on individual lots shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 19.40 SVMC,Alternative Residential Development Options. Ordinance 21-010—Batch Text Amendment Page 4 of 13 Draft I.Manufactured Home Park.Manufactured home parks shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 19.40 SVMC,Alternative Residential Development Options. J. Recreational Vehicles. 1. Recreational vehicles shall not be used as permanent or temporary dwelling units in any residential zone,except as permitted pursuant to Chapter 19.40 SVMC; 2.A recreational vehicle shall not be parked within a required front yard setback for more than 15 consecutive days and not more than 30 days cumulative in any 12 consecutive months; and 3. Guests may park and/or occupy a recreational vehicle while visiting the occupants of a dwelling unit located on the same lot for not more than 30 days in one consecutive 12-month period. 19.65.150 Transportation. Battery Charging Station. Battery charging stations are allowed only as accessory to a permitted use in the R-1, R-2,R-3,R-4 and P/OS zones. Section 5. Amendment. Chapter 19.70 SVMC is hereby amended as follows: 19.70.020 Residential standards. Residential development shall meet the standards shown in Table 19.70-1. Standards for alternative residential development are set forth in Chapter 19.40 SVMC,Alternative Residential Development Options, and standards for planned residential developments are set forth in Chapter 19.50 SVMC, Planned Residential Developments. Table 19.70-1—Residential Standards R-1 R-2 R-3 R-4 MFR(1) Front and Flanking Street 35' 15' 15' 15' 15' Yard Setback Garage Setbackm 35' 20' 20' 20' 20' Rear Yard Setback 20' 20' 10' 10' 10' Minimum Side Yard Setback 5' 5' 5' 5' 5' Open Space N/A N/A N/A N/A 10%gross area(3) Lot Size 40,000 sq. 10,000 sq. 5,000 sq. 4,300 sq. N/Ao> ft. ft. ft(6) ft. Lot Coverage 30.0% 50.0% 50.0% 60.0% 60.0% Maximum Density 1 du/ac 4 du/ac 8 du/ac 10 du/ac 22 du/ac Building Heights) 35' 35' 35' 35' 50' (1) Where MFR abuts R 1,R-2,ef-R-3, or R-4 zones,development shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 19.75 SVMC,Transitional Regulations. (2) Attached garages,where the garage door does not face the street,may have the same setback as the primary structure. (3) Open space requirement does not apply to single-family development in the MFR zone. Ordinance 21-010—Batch Text Amendment Page 5 of 13 Draft Table 19.70-1 —Residential Standards R-1 R-2 R-3 R-4 MFR(1) (4) Single-family residential development in the MFR zone shall have a minimum lot size of 2,000 square feet per dwelling unit. Only one single-family dwelling shall be allowed per lot. (5) The vertical distance from the average finished grade to the average height of the highest roof surface. (6) Duplex development in the R-3 zone shall have a minimum lot size of 14,500 square feet. 19.70.030 Mixed-use and nonresidential standards. A. Development in the RC,CMU,MU,IMU, and I zones shall meet the requirements set forth in SVMC Title 24 and Chapter 19.75 SVMC,Transitional Regulations. B.Nonresidential development in the NC zone adjacent to residential uses shall comply with the following dimensional standards: 1.Maximum building height of 35 feet; 2.Minimum front yard setback of 15 feet; 3.Minimum side yard setback of 10 feet; and 4.Minimum rear yard setback of 10 feet. 19.70.040 Setback designation and measurement. A. Except as provided in SVMC 19.70.040(B),each lot shall contain only one front setback and only one rear setback.Any other setback shall be considered a side setback. B. Where lots have double frontage,running through from one street to another,the required front yard shall be provided on both streets. C. The city manager or designee is authorized to designate front,rear, and side setbacks. In situations where the city manager or designee cannot establish a front and rear setback due to the orientation of the lot,the city manager or designee shall establish these setbacks based upon orientation of the lot as compared to surrounding lots and to any existing development pattern.All other setbacks shall be defined in relation to the established front and rear setback. D. The setback shall be measured from the property line unless there is a border easement,in which case, the setback shall be measured from the border easement. E. Setbacks,when adjacent to a private street or driveway easement, shall be measured from the inner edges of the street or driveway and are established pursuant to Table 19.70-1 except the flanking street which is five feet. 19.70.050 Additional standards. A. Structure intrusions into setbacks are prohibited except: Ordinance 21-010—Batch Text Amendment Page 6 of 13 Draft 1. The ordinary projections of window sills,belt courses,cornices, and other architectural features projecting not more than 12 inches and roof eaves projecting not more than 24 inches. 2.Minor features of a structure, such as chimneys,fire escapes,bay windows no more than 12 feet long and which cantilever beyond the foundation of the structure,uncovered stairways,wheelchair ramps, and uncovered decks or balconies,may extend into a required setback up to 20 percent of the depth of the setback.However,these features may not be within three feet of a lot line when a setback is required. 3.Attached mechanical equipment such as heat pumps,air conditioners,emergency generators,and water pumps are allowed to project not more than 24 inches into the side or rear setback only. 4.Fences that meet the requirements set forth in SVMC 22.70.020. 5. Walkways and driveways,including parking in the driveway,are allowed in the front yard setback of R-1,R-2, and R-3, and R-4 zones only. 6. Canopies,marquees,awnings, and similar features in mixed-use or nonresidential zones may fully extend into a front yard setback subject to the requirements of SVMC Title 24. B. Supporting member of any garage,carport,portable carport, or other automobile storage structure shall not be located within the required front yard. C.Accessory structures shall not be erected within five feet of any rear or side property line,or be located within the front yard or any public or private easement. D. Where applicable,structures shall not be erected to a height in excess of that permitted by SVMC 19.110.030,Airport hazard overlay. E. In R-1,R-2, R-3, and R-4 zones,cooling towers,roof gables,chimneys, and vent stacks may extend for an additional height,not to exceed 40 feet,above the average finished grade of the building. Water stand pipes and tanks,church steeples,domes and spires, and school buildings and institutional buildings may be erected to exceed maximum height requirements;provided,that one additional foot shall be added to the width and depth of front, side, and rear yards for each foot that such structures exceed the required height. F. Open space required pursuant to Table 19.70-1 shall be accessible to all residential units and shall be suitable for active and passive recreational purposes, subject to the following: 1. The required open space area shall not include required yards,parking areas,required landscaped areas, stormwater facilities,or required spacing between structures; 2. The amount of open space may be reduced by up to 25 percent where at least two of the following amenities are provided: a.Play or sports courts; b. Playgrounds with equipment; c. Trails or pedestrian walkways not required for access to residential units or parking areas; Ordinance 21-010—Batch Text Amendment Page 7 of 13 Draft d. Swimming pools; e. Gazebos; or f. Clubhouses; 3. The required open space shall not be reduced by more than 50 percent. G. Residential development in nonresidential zones shall comply with the density and dimensional standards of the MFR zone in Table 19.70-1,except single-family development in the NC zone,which shall comply with the density and dimensional standards of the adjacent single-family residential zone. Where the NC zone abuts multiple single-family residential zones,the zone with the higher density shall apply. Where there are no single-family residential adjacencies to the NC zone,the density and dimensional standards of the R-2 zone shall apply. H.New development exceeding three stories in height shall be served by paved service lanes that are at least 16 feet in width. I. The following design standards apply to all outdoor lighting in residential zones: 1.All new development shall provide lighting within parking lots, along pedestrian walkways, and accessible routes of travel. 2. Lighting fixtures shall be limited to heights of no more than 24 feet for parking lots and no more than 16 feet for pedestrian walkways. 3.All lighting shall be shielded from producing off-site glare, either through exterior shields or through optical design inside the fixture, and shall not emit light above 90 degrees. 4. Street lighting installed by the City or other public utilities is exempt from SVMC 19.70.050(I). J. Principal or accessory structures shall not be located within the clearview triangle pursuant to Chapter 22.70 SVMC. Section 6. Amendment. Chapter 19.75 SVMC is hereby amended as follows: 19.75.020 Applicability. A. General. 1. The ground level setback requirements shall apply to any portion of a property located in the: a.MFR,RC,CMU,or MU zone that abuts a property located in the R-1,R-2,er-R-3,or R-4; or b. I or IMU zone that abuts any property not zoned I or IMU. 2. The upper level setback requirements shall apply to any portion of a property located in the MFR,RC,CMU,MU,I,or IMU zones. Ordinance 21-010—Batch Text Amendment Page 8 of 13 Draft 3.Nonresidential development in the NC zone adjacent to residential zones shall comply with the provisions of SVMC 19.70.030(B). B.Exemptions. Wireless communications facilities are not subject to Chapter 19.75 SVMC. C. The application of transitional regulations may be modified by the city manager or designee consistent with Chapter 19.75 SVMC. 19.75.030 Transitional regulations. A. General.The transition shall be provided in the form of a ground level setback of 10 feet,or the applicable setback pursuant to Chapter 19.70 SVMC,Density and Dimensions,whichever is greater, and an upper level setback as provided in SVMC 19.75.030(A)(2) and illustrated in Figure 19.75-1. 1.All transitional ground level setback areas shall be landscaped pursuant to the provisions of SVMC 22.70.070. 2.Upper Level Setback Calculation. a. Starting at a height of 15 feet at the boundary of an R-1,R-2,er—R-3,or R-4 zone,the building height may be increased at a ratio of one foot of height for every one foot of horizontal distance from the nearest R-1,R-2,or R-3 zone boundary.Figure 19.75-1 provides a graphic illustration of this requirement. b. Where the protected zone boundary is the centerline of a right-of-way,the horizontal distance calculation in SVMC 19.75.030(A)(2)(a) shall be measured from the property line of the zone providing protection.Figure 19.75-1 provides a graphic illustration of this requirement. tI C I � I 1V aI 4NJ I al awe in_ r 15 Protected Zones 10'min Zones Providing Protection setback Figure 19.75-1 B. The following regulations shall apply to the ground level transitional setback areas: Ordinance 21-010—Batch Text Amendment Page 9 of 13 Draft 1. Outdoor sales,outdoor seating,or outdoor displays or signage are prohibited within 30 feet of any R-1,R-2,er-R-3, or R-4 zone. 2. Parking,drive aisles,and/or queuing areas in the RC, CMU,MU,IMU,and I zones are prohibited within 20 feet of any R-1,R-2,er-R-3, or R-4 zone.All parking and drive aisles shall be landscaped and screened pursuant to SVMC 22.70.050 and 22.70.070. 3. Loading areas in the RC,CMU,MU,IMU,and I zones are prohibited within 30 feet of any R-1, R-2,er-R-3, or R-4 zone. 4.Any mechanical equipment,building vents,and exhausts within the transitional setback areas shall be visually screened pursuant to SVMC 22.70.070.All building vents and mechanical equipment exhausts shall be directed away from adjacent R-1,R-2,er-R-3, or R-4 zone. 5.All outdoor lighting in the transitional setback areas shall be shielded and not produce off-site glare pursuant to SVMC 22.60.030 and shall be limited to 16 feet in height above grade. 19.75.040 Ground level transitional use limitations. A. In the MFR zone ground level transitional setback areas,only the following uses are permitted: 1. Open space and landscaping. 2. Outdoor recreation areas accessory to residential uses. 3. Parking and parking structures. 4. Club houses. B. In the ground level transitional setback areas of RC, CMU and MU zones,only the following uses are permitted: 1. Open space and landscaping. 2. Pedestrian pathways. 3. Outdoor recreation areas accessory to permitted uses on site. C. In the ground level transitional setback areas of the I and IMU zones, the following uses are prohibited within 20 feet of a NC,RC,CMU,or MU zone: 1.Agriculture and animal uses located outside of an enclosed building; 2.Heavy industrial uses conducted outside of an enclosed building; 3. Warehouse,wholesale and freight movement uses outside of an enclosed building; and 4. Transportation uses located outside of an enclosed building. Ordinance 21-010—Batch Text Amendment Page 10 of 13 Draft D. In the ground level transitional setback areas of the I and IMU zones,the following uses are prohibited within 30 feet of a R-1,R-2,R-3,R-4,or MFR zone: 1.Agriculture and animal uses; 2.Heavy industrial uses; 3. Warehouse,wholesale and freight movement uses outside of an enclosed building; 4. Transportation uses located outside of an enclosed building; and 5. Outdoor storage accessory to any of the above uses unless visually screened pursuant to SVMC 22.70.070. Section 7. Amendment. Chapter 19.80 SVMC is hereby amended as follows: 19.80.030 Adult use development standards. A. There shall be five existing acres of contiguous(includes across streets)zoning classified Regional Commercial. B. The use shall be located or maintained at least 1,000 feet from the nearest property line of the use listed in SVMC 19.80.030(B)(1)through(6). Distance shall be measured from the nearest property line of the adult retail use establishment or adult entertainment establishment(s)to the nearest property line of the following preexisting uses: 1. Public library; 2. Public playground or park; 3. Public or private school and its grounds of kindergarten to twelfth grade; 4.Nursery school,mini-day care center,or day care center; 5. Church,convent,monastery, synagogue,or other place of religious worship; 6. Another adult use subject to the provisions of SVMC 19.80.030. C. An adult retail use establishment or adult entertainment establishment(s) shall not be located within 1,000 feet of an urban growth area boundary or within 1,000 feet of any of the following zones: 1. R-1, Single-Family Residential Estate; 2. R-2, Single-Family Residential Suburban; 3. R-3, Single-Family Residential; 4. R-4, Single-Family Residential Urban; 45.MFR,Multifamily Residential; Ordinance 21-010—Batch Text Amendment Page 11 of 13 Draft �6.MU,Mixed Use; 67. CMU,Corridor Mixed Use; or g8.NC,Neighborhood Commercial. Section 8. Amendment. Chapter 19.85 SVMC is hereby amended as follows: 19.85.060 Marijuana production and processing in residential zones. Washington State law authorizes qualified patients and designated providers to produce marijuana and to process marijuana in dwellings,residences,domiciles,and similar housing units under limited circumstances and with limited processing methods. Subject to applicable federal,state,and local laws, any owner,lessor,or leasing agent may request or require disclosure of a renter's or lessee's desire to produce or process marijuana within a rented or leased dwelling unit. In addition to compliance with any applicable state or federal laws and regulations,lawful production or processing of marijuana by any person in a dwelling,residence,domicile,or other similar housing unit shall be subject to all locally applicable land use,development,zoning, and building regulation requirements including,but not limited to,all applicable requirements set forth in SVMC Titles 17 through 24 as the same are now adopted or hereafter amended, and the following regulations: A.Any home production or processing of marijuana by any person pursuant to state law shall not be permitted outside of the dwelling or accessory structure; B.Any home production or processing of marijuana by any person or allowed by state law in a dwelling or accessory structure shall be enclosed,blocked,or sight-screened from the public right-of-way and from adjacent properties so that no portion may be readily seen by normal unaided vision or readily smelled from such locations.Accessory structures shall be permanent structures enclosed by a roof and walls on all sides and connected to a permanent foundation.For purposes of SVMC 19.85.060,accessory structures shall not include cargo containers,recreational vehicles,or other similar types of structures. Accessory structures shall be completely opaque in addition to necessary sight-screening; C. Home processing of marijuana shall not involve any combustible method and shall comply with all federal, state, and local laws and rules,including all standards adopted by the Washington State Liquor and Cannabis Board; and D. Production or processing of marijuana by any person pursuant to state law in a dwelling or accessory structure shall only be allowed in the R-1,R-2, and R-3, and R-4 zones. Section 9. Other sections unchanged. All other provisions of Title 19 SVMC not specifically referenced hereto shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect. Section 10. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance shall be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section,sentence,clause,or phrase of this Ordinance. Section 11. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect five days after publication of this Ordinance or a summary thereof in the official newspaper of the City of Spokane Valley as provided by law. Ordinance 21-010—Batch Text Amendment Page 12 of 13 Draft Passed by the City Council this day of August, 2021. ATTEST: Ben Wick,Mayor Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Approved as to Form: Office of the City Attorney Date of Publication: Effective Date: Ordinance 21-010—Batch Text Amendment Page 13 of 13 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE SPOKANE VALLEY PLANNING COMMISSION CTA-2021-0001 Proposed Amendment to Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) Pursuant to SVMC 17.80.150(E) the Planning Commission shall consider the proposal and shall prepare and forward a recommendation to the City Council following the public hearing. The following fndings. are consistent with the Planning Commission recommendation. Background: I. Pursuant to RCW 36.70A.130, Spokane Valley adopted its 2016 Comprehensive Plan Update and updated development regulations on December 13,2016,with December 28,2016 as the effective date. 2. CTA-2021-0001 is a City-initiated text amendment to relocate the regulations governing cargo containers from the Alternative Residential Options section of the code to the Supplemental Use Regulations section and add a reference to the R-4 zone in applicable sections of the zoning code that were intended to address all residential zones. 3. The Planning Commission held a properly noticed public hearing and conducted deliberations on June 10,2021. The Commissioners voted 7-0 to recommend that the City Council adopt the amendment. Planning Commission Findings: 1. Compliance with SVMC 17.80.150(F)Approval Criteria a. The proposed text amendment is consistent with the applicable provisions of the Comprehensive Plan. Findings: The proposed amendment is supported by the Comprehensive Plan and is consistent with the following goals and policies: Goal LU-G4: Ensure that land use plans, regulations, review processes, and infrastructure improvements support economic growth and vitality. Policy LU-P5: Ensure compatibility between adjacent residential and commercial or industrial uses. Policy LU-P7: Protect residential neighborhoods from incompatible land uses and adverse impacts associated with transportation corridors. Policy LU-P9: Provide supportive regulations for new and innovative development types on commercial, industrial,and mixed-use land. Conclusion: The proposed text amendment is supported by the Comprehensive Plan and consistent with the goals and policies. b. The proposed amendment bears a substantial relation to public health, safety, welfare and protection of the environment. Findings: The proposed amendment bears substantial relation to public health,safety, welfare and protection of the environment. The amendment ensures that the transitional regulations are applied to all instances in which non-residential development occurs adjacent to residential development in the R-4 zone and ensures transportation,adult and marijuana use regulations will be properly applied in the R-4 zone. The amendment additionally clarifies that cargo shipping containers are not allowed in residential zones to protect the quality and character of residential neighborhoods. Findings and Recommendations of the Spokane Valley Planning Commission CTA-2021-0001 Page 1 of 2 Conclusion: The proposed text amendment is consistent with Comprehensive Plan and bears a substantial relation to public health,safety, welfare, and protection of the environment. 2. Recommendation: The Spokane Valley Planning Commission therefore recommends the City Council approve CTA-2021- 0001 as proposed. Attachment: Exhibit 1 —Proposed Amendment CTA-2021-0001 Approved this 24th day of June,2021 Planning Commission Chairman ATTEST Marianne Lemons,Office Assistant Findings and Recommendations of the Spokane Valley Planning Commission CTA-202 1-0001 Page 2 of 2 Meeting Minutes Spokane Valley Planning Commission Council Chambers—City Hall May 27, 2021 Planning Commission Chair Bob McKinley called the meeting to order at 6:01 p.m. The meeting was held remotely via ZOOM meeting. II. Administrative Assistant Taylor Dillard took roll and the following members and staff were present: Fred Beaulac Cary Driskell, City Attorney Karl Granrath Caitlin Prunty, City Attorney Walt Hawke Jenny Nickerson, Building Official Bob McKinley Martin Palaniuk, Planner Nancy Miller Taylor Dillard, Administrative Assistant Paul Rieckers Sherri Robinson Hi. AGENDA: Commissioner Robinson moved to approve the May 27, 2021 meeting agenda as presented There was no discussion. The vote on the motion was seven in fervor, zero against and the motion passed. IV. MINUTES: Commissioner Beaulac moved to approve the May 13, 2021 minutes as presented. There was no discussion. The vote on the motion was seven in,jdrnor, zero against and the motion passed. V. COMMISSION REPORTS: There were no Planning Commission reports. VI. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT: There was no administrative report. VII. PUBLIC COMMENT: There was no public comment. VIII.. COMMISSION BUSINESS: a. Study Session: CTA-2021-0001 —Batch Code Text Amendment City Planner Martin Palaniuk gave a presentation on the proposed City-initiated text amendment to Title 19 of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC). He stated that the amendment is to clarify that cargo containers are not allowed in residential zones as an accessory structure and reference the R-4 zone in applicable sections of the zoning code that were intended to address all residential zones. Mr. Palaniuk explained that SVMC 19.40.030(D)(6) has details regarding cargo containers under the Development Standards—Accessory Dwelling Units (ADU) section of the code. 1 05-27-2021 Planning Commission Minutes Page 2 of'3 lie stated that staff feels that the current code location causes ambiguity as to whether the provision applies to cargo shipping containers throughout all residential zones or only shipping containers used as an ADU. The proposed amendment will move the provision to SVMC 19.65,130—Supplemental Use Regulations, Residential. This section of the code provides supplemental regulations that apply to accessory structures in all residential zones and will clarify that shipping containers are not permitted as an accessory structure in residential zones. Mr. Palaniuk also explained that in 2020, the City Council adopted a comprehensive plan amendment that created the R-4 zoning district. The amendment also included changes to Title 19, Zoning Regulations, which added development standards for the new zoning district. He stated that since the adoption of the amendment staff has found that several sections relevant to all residential zones were overlooked including sections related to battery charging stations, transitional regulations, adult uses, and marijuana uses. The proposed amendment will fix these items throughout the residential zones. He stated that there are no regulatory requirements being added to the zones and the proposed change is to keep the code consistent. Commissioner Haneke asked if the"POD"containers are allowed for temporary storage due to a remodel. Building Official Nickerson answered that they are allowed if the resident procures a"Temporary Use Permit". However, they are not allowed to be used for a long- term storage or as a storage shed. Actual cargo shipping containers would not qualify for a temporary use permit because they are prohibited by the code in all residential zones. Mr. Palaniuk said that the public hearing for this proposed code text amendment will be held on June 10, 2021. h. Presentation: 'Piny Homes Building Official Jenny Nickerson gave an informational presentation regarding tiny homes. She explained that the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) does not define the minimum size of a dwelling unit so a tiny home is just a single-family dwelling unit by classification. however, there are regulations regarding accessory dwelling unit stating that the unit cannot be smaller than 300 square feet. The International Residential Code (IRC) states that a dwelling is required to contain a habitable room of at least 70 square feet and it does not require that the bathroom be a separate room. In February 2021, Washington State adopted a portion of IRC Appendix Q which specifically addresses tiny houses. It states that a tiny house is defined as a home that is less than 400 square feet, excluding lofts. A loft is defined as a floor level above and open to the main floor with a ceiling height of less than 6'8". Ms.Nickerson explained that a tiny home constructed on-site requires a simple building permit. If a tiny home is constructed off-site, a permit is required at the construction location. If the tiny home is built onto a trailer, it is classified as a recreational vehicle (RV) and a permit from Labor & Industries is required. If a tiny home is built in a factory, it is classified as a manufactured home or park model RV. If a shed is converted to a tiny house, a simple building permit is required for both the shed and the conversion. Ms. Nickerson stated that a tiny home constructed on site must be designed in accordance with Washington Building Code and go through the typical building permit process (as long as it meets the zoning requirements and the building code requirements). The dwelling unit 2 05-27-202I Planning Commission Minutes Page 3 o!'3 may be as small as 70 square feet and can be designed to be removed from foundation and transported. A tiny home constructed in a factory is regulated by the Washington State Labor and Industries Factory Assembled Structures division. The local building department regulates the anchoring of the home to a foundation or footing system. Tiny homes constructed on a trailer rarely meet the minimum standards and are commonly licensed as an RV. Commissioner Miller commented that she thinks there should be a minimum square foot requirement on the primary dwelling unit on a property (like there is for accessory dwelling units). IX. GOOD OF THE ORDER: Commissioner Granrath commented that he was excited to see that the City of Spokane Valley purchased land to be added to the parks system.. Commissioner Robinson stated that she is excited that the Balfour Park expansion and the Library construction is moving forward. X. ADJOURNMENT: Commissioner Haneke moved to adjourn the meeting a! 6::53 p.m. There was no discussion. The vote on the motion was seven in favor, zero against, and the motion passed. Bob McKinley, Chair Date signed Marianne Lemons, Secretary 3 Meeting Minutes Spokane Valley Planning Commission Council Chambers—City Hall June 10,2021 I. Planning Commission Chair Bob McKinley called the meeting to order at 6:02 p.m. The meeting was held remotely via ZOOM meeting. IL Administrative Assistant Taylor Dillard took roll and the following members and staff were present: Fred Beaulac Cary Driskell, City Attorney Karl Granrath Jenny Nickerson, Building Official Walt Haneke Martin Palaniuk, Planner Bob McKinley Taylor Dillard, Administrative Assistant Nancy Miller Marianne Lemons, Administrative Assistant Paul Rieckers Sherri Robinson III. AGENDA: Commissioner Robinson moved to approve the June 10, 2021 meeting agenda as presented. There was no discussion. The vote on the motion was seven in favor, zero against and the motion passed. IV. MINUTES: Commissioner Beaulac moved to approve the May 27, 2021 minutes as prescented. There was no discussion. The vote on the motion was seven in favor, zero against and the motion passed. V. COMMISSION REPORTS: Commissioner Haneke requested that a discussion be held at a future meeting regarding the possibility of allowing shipping containers in certain circumstances. There was a consensus from the Planning Commission to have the discussion on a future meeting agenda. Commissioner Miller commented that condominium legislation has been signed by the Governor and there is a developer interested in doing a development in Spokane Valley. VI. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT: Administrative Assistant Taylor Dillard explained the best way of joining the webinar zoom meeting. VII. PUBLIC COMMENT: There was no public comment. VIII. COMMISSION BUSINESS: a. Public hearing: CTA-2021-0001 — Batch Code Text Amendment The public hearing was opened at 6:19 p.m. 1 06-10-2021 Planning Commission Minutes Page 2 of 2 City Planner Martin Palaniuk gave a presentation on the proposed City-initiated text amendment to Title 19 of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC). He stated that the amendment is to clarify that cargo containers are not allowed in residential zones as an accessory structure and referenced the R-4 zone in applicable sections of the zoning code that were intended to address all residential zones. Mr. Palaniuk explained that SVMC 19,40.030(D)(6) has details regarding cargo containers under the Development Standards—Accessory Dwelling Units (ADU) section of the code. He stated that staff feels that the current code location causes ambiguity as to whether the provision applies to cargo shipping containers throughout all residential zones or only shipping containers used as an ADU. The proposed amendment will move the provision to SVMC 19.65.130—Supplemental Use Regulations, Residential. This section of the code provides supplemental regulations that apply to accessory structures in all residential zones and will clarify that shipping containers are not permitted as an accessory structure in residential zones. Mr. Palaniuk also explained that in 2020, the City Council adopted a comprehensive plan amendment that created the R-4 zoning district. The amendment also included changes to Title 19, Zoning Regulations, which added development standards for the new zoning district. He stated that since the adoption of the amendment, staff has found that several sections relevant to all residential zones were overlooked including sections related to battery charging stations, transitional regulations, adult uses, and marijuana uses. The proposed amendment will fix these items throughout the residential zones. He stated that there are no regulatory requirements being added to the zones and the proposed change is to keep the code consistent. There was no public comment. The public hearing was closed at 6:28 p.m. Commissioner Miller••moved to recommend City Council approve CTA-2021-0001 as presented. There was no discussion. The vote on the motion was seven in f tvor•, zero against and the motion passed. IX. GOOD OF THE ORDER: Commissioner Beaulac commented that he would like the Planning Commission meetings to be held in the Council Chambers. X. ADJOURNMENT: Commissioner Haneke moved to adjourn the meeting at 6:39 p.m. There was no discussion. The vote on the motion was seven in favor, zero against, and the motion passed. Bob McKinley, Chair Date signed Marianne Lemons, Secretary 2 Meeting Minutes Spokane Valley Planning Commission Council Chambers—City Hall June 24,2021 I. Planning Commission Chair Bob McKinley called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. The meeting was held remotely via ZOOM meeting. IL Administrative Assistant Taylor Dillard took roll and the following members and staff were present: Fred Beaulac Cary Driskell, City Attorney Karl Granrath Jenny Nickerson,Building Official Walt Haneke Mike Basinger, Economic Development Manager Bob McKinley Chaz Bates, Senior Planner Nancy Miller Arielle Anderson, Housing&Homeless Coordinator Paul Rieckers Taylor Dillard, Administrative Assistant Sherri Robinson Marianne Lemons, Administrative Assistant III. AGENDA: Commissioner Haneke moved to approve the June 24, 2021 meeting agenda as presented. There was no discussion. The vote on the motion was seven in favor, zero against and the motion passed. IV. MINUTES: Commissioner Beaulac moved to approve the June 10, 2021 minutes as presented. There was no discussion. The vote on the motion was seven in favor, zero against and the motion passed. V. COMMISSION REPORTS: Commissioner Robinson stated that she was happy to see that signs have been added to 32"d Avenue and Dishman Mica Road that read "bike lane ends". She also mentioned that she hopes the bikes lane connect to each other in the future. VI. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT: Building Official Jenny Nickerson stated that per the request of the Planning Commission at the last meeting, staff is putting together information regarding shipping containers. That agenda item will be presented at the July 22, 2021 meeting. She commented that City Hall has reopened for business and in-person meetings are being discussed. However, a formal date for an in-person meeting has not been decided yet. She also mentioned that Commissioners McKinley, Granrath, and Rieckers' terms are up at the end of the year. Anyone interested in applying for those positions should submit their applications. The deadline for applications is in October and will be published in the newspaper by the City Clerk. VII. PUBLIC COMMENT: There was no public comment. VHI. COMMISSION BUSINESS: 1 06-24-2021 Planning Commission Minutes Page 2 of 4 a. Findings Of Fact: CTA-2021-0001 —Batch Code Text Amendment Building Official Jenny Nickerson presented the Findings Of Fact for CTA-2021-0001 — Batch Code Text Amendment. She stated that the Planning Commission held a public hearing regarding the proposed code text amendment at the June 10,2021 meeting. The Planning Commission voted 7-0 to forward the Code Text Amendment to the City Council with a recommendation of approval. She explained that the approval of the Findings Of Fact will formalize the recommendations that were made at the public hearing. Commissioner Beaulac moved to approve the Findings of Fact for CTA-2021-0001 as presented. There was no discussion. The vote on the motion was seven in favor, zero against and the motion passed. b. Study Session: 2021 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Senior Planner Chaz Bates gave a staff presentation regarding the 2021 Comprehensive Plan Amendments. He explained that local jurisdictions are allowed to make amendments to the Comprehensive Plan once each year. The amendments are initiated by property owners, residents, or by the City. The application deadline to submit is October 30th Notice was published 60 days prior to October 1st and sent to agencies, organizations, and adjacent jurisdictions. The amendments were docketed by the City Council and then sent to the Planning Commission for consideration. A public hearing on the amendments will be held on July 8, 2021 and Findings Of Fact will be heard on August 12, 2021. The item will then be sent back to City Council for final consideration and approval. Public hearing notices were published twice in the newspaper, posted on the properties, and mailed to property owners within 400 feet of the site-specific map amendments. Mr. Bates outlined the four amendments to be heard during the 2021 cycle. CPA-2021-0001: Request to change the.68 acres from Multiple Family Residential(MFR) to Corridor Mixed Use(CMU). Mr.Bates said that this amendment is privately initiated for the property located at 22 N. Skipworth Road. It is owned by Homtomi Partners. The request is to rezone the property from Multi-Family residential (MFR)to Corridor Mixed Use (CMU). The property to the east, south, and west are all zoned CMU. The property to the north is zoned MFR. Findings show there are no critical areas on the site, the site would support the redevelopment and infill of the parcel,would support the increase of housing opportunities, is supported by the transportation network, and is compatible with the surrounding uses. Commissioner Haneke asked for additional information regarding the proposed development of the property. Mr. Bates answered that the proposal is to add four additional units including carports. He reminded the Commission that this change is only regarding land use and the applicants would not be required to do the proposed development. Mr. Haneke asked if the current structure could be completely demolished and something else built in its place. Mr. Bates answered that it would be allowed. Commissioner Miller and Robinson also expressed concern about the applicant tearing down the current low-income housing units if the zoning change is allowed. Commissioner Granrath asked if the proposed development meets all current code regulations. Building Official Nickerson answered that the site plan has not been reviewed 2 06-24-202I Planning Commission Minutes Page 3 of 4 for code compliance because it has not been formally submitted for development application. However,there are no setback requirements in the CMU zone except as discussed in the transitional regulations (which would apply only to the northern property line where there is MFR zoning). Commissioner Haneke asked about height regulations. Ms.Nickerson answered that there are no maximum height limitation or lot coverage regulations in the CMU zone. CPA-2021-0002: Request to change 5.56 acres from Corridor Mixed Use (CMU) to Parks, Recreation, and Open Space(NOS). Mr. Bates explained that this amendment is City initiated for the property located across the street from City Hall on Sprague Avenue and the future proposed use is to expand Balfour Park. The City owns this property and requests to rezone the property from Corridor Mixed Use (CMU)to Parks, Recreation, and Open Space (P/OS). The property to the west(Balfour Park) is zoned P/OS, the property to the west and south is CMU, and the property to the north is MFR. The property is currently vacant. Findings show there are no critical areas on the site, the site would support Park Level of Service, is supported by the transportation network, is compatible with the surrounding uses, and implements the Parks and Recreation Master Plan. Chairman McKinley commented that he attended a presentation by Mayor Ben Wick regarding the development of the library and the Balfour Park expansion and he thinks that the ideas for this area are very exciting and will be a good addition to the City. CPA-2021-0003: Request to change 46 acres from Industrial(I) to Parks,Recreation, and Open Space (P/OS). Mr. Bates stated that this amendment is City initiated for the four parcels located between the Spokane River and Union Pacific railroad east of Flora Road (the property is unaddressed). The City owns the property and request to rezone the property from Industrial (I) to Parks, Recreation, and Open Space (P/OS). The properties to the north, west, and east are all zoned I, and the property to the east is zoned P/OS. Findings show that the proposal would support Park Level of Service, it is a newly acquired property purchased specifically for park land, and it is compatible with surrounding uses. Commissioner Beaulac asked about wildlife conservation on the property. Mr. Bates answered that the City recognizes that there is critical wildlife habitat and frequently flooded areas on the property. CPA-2021-0004: Add goals,policies, strategies, and background text related to homelessness. Housing and Homeless Coordinator Arielle Anderson explained that the text amendment is City initiated to add goals,policies, and strategies to formalize the City's position on community resources ranging from homeless services to housing instability. She stated that the Comprehensive Plan currently lacks goals, policies and strategies for people who are unsheltered and facing housing instability. The proposed text amendment formalizes the City's commitment to a regional approach to reduce homelessness and address the lack of guidance in the development of zoning regulations regarding site housing and homeless services. The proposed amendments ensure that current publicly funded programs are equally accessible by City residents, formalizes the City action to develop implementing 3 06-24-2021 Planning Commission Minutes Page 4 of 4 regulations to build out services in the community, supports continued regional cooperation, and ensures that all facilities sited in the City have commensurate on-site support. She explained that the amendment is non-site specific and does not detail where services will be located but it will address an identified deficiency within the Comprehensive Plan and support the development of a Homeless Response System specific to the needs of the City. Commissioner Beaulac asked if the amendment is consistent with the Housing Action Plan (HAP) that was recently adopted. Mr. Bates answered that it is consistent with the HAP. Mr. Beaulac also commented that he would like to see more recent data included in the amendment rather than data from 2014-2015. Commission Haneke asked about the Homeless Response System. Ms. Anderson answered that the Response System is a consistent, dependable, and streamlined response to how services will be rendered to citizens in need. IX. GOOD OF THE ORDER: Vice-Chair Robinson commented she is very happy that the City is pursuing solutions for the homeless population. She also stated that she feels that the Commission should be diving into the hard questions of land use changes and really looking at possible development projects that could occur before approving those changes. Chairman McKinley encouraged the Commissioners to listen to the State of the City that was done by Mayor Ben Wick. X. ADJOURNMENT: Commissioner Haneke moved to adjourn the meeting at 7:24 p.m. There was no discussion. The vote on the motion was seven in favor, zero against, and the motion passed. Bob McKinley, Chair Date signed Marianne Lemons, Secretary 4 COMMUNITY AND PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING&PLANNING Spokane Valley STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO THE PLANNING COM ISSION CTA-2021-0001 STAFF REPORT DATE: May 19,2021 HEARING DATE AND LOCATION: June 10, 2021, beginning at 6:00 p.m., Spokane Valley City Hall Council Chambers, 10210 East Sprague Avenue, Spokane Valley,Washington 99206. PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: The proposed amendment is a City-initiated text amendment to Title 19 of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC). The proposed amendment will move regulatory standards for cargo shipping containers from SVMC 19.40.030. Accessory dwelling units to SVMC 19.65.130 Residential that addresses residential accessory structures. The amendment also adds the "R-4 zoning district"throughout Title 19 to achieve consistency with Ordinance#20-008 and#20-009 adopting the 2020 Comprehensive Plan Amendment CPA-2020-0007 and Ordinance #20-009 adopting the Comprehensive Plan Zoning Map that established the R-4 zoning district as new zone. APPROVAL CRITERIA: Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan, SVMC I7.80.150, 19.30.040. SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS: Staff concludes that the proposed amendments to SVMC Title 19 are consistent with minimum criteria for review and approval, and consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. STAFF CONTACT:Martin Palaniuk,Planner and Lori Barlow,AICP, Senior Planner ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit 1: Proposed Text Amendment Language Exhibit 2: Presentation Exhibit 3: SEPA exemption determination email—May 4,2021 BACKGROUND INFORMATION 1, APPLICATION PROCESSING: SVMC Chapter 17.80, Permit Processing Procedures. The following table summarizes the procedural steps for the proposal. Process Date Department of Commerce 60-day Notice of Intent to May 6, 2021 Adopt Amendment SEPA Review—N/A-see exhibit 3 Published Notice of Public Hearing: May 21 &May 28,2021 Cargo Shipping Container Background: SVMC 19.40.030(D)(6)—Development Standards—Accessory dwelling units (ADU) states "Cargo shipping containers and similar enclosures are not a permitted accessory structure in any residential zoning district." Staff Report and Recommendation CTA-2021-0001 The location of this provision within the development standards for accessory dwelling units is "out of place". The intent of the code is to prohibit cargo shipping containers as a permitted structure in residential zones as an accessory use. The current code location leads to ambiguity as to whether the provision applies to cargo shipping containers throughout all residential zones or only cargo shipping containers as an ADU. The proposed amendment will move the provision to SVMC 19.65.130 —Supplemental Use Regulations, Residential. This section of the code provides supplemental regulations that apply to accessory structures in ALL residential zones. This section within the SVMC clarifies that shipping containers are prohibited as an accessory structure to a residential use in residential zones. Staff Analysis: The movement of the code provision does not change the way that cargo shipping containers are regulated. The change places the provision in the code where it has the broad applicability intended and clearly states that cargo shipping containers are not an allowed accessory use in residential zones. R-4 Background: In 2020 the City of Spokane Valley City Council adopted a comprehensive plan amendment CPA-2020-0007 by ordinance #20-008 that added two policies to guide the development of alternative housing types along with implementing zoning code amendments. The amendment included creating a new R-4 zoning district that would provide more housing options for residents near public transit and commercial services. The amendment also included changes to Title 19, Zoning Regulations, adding development standards for the new R-4 zoning district that had application in various sections. Subsequently it was found that several sections were overlooked during the amendment process and this amendment will make sure those sections will include the R-4 zone. StaffAnalysis: CPA-2020-0007 established the R-4 Single-family Residential Urban Zone. The R-4 zone is a single-family residential zone and was intended to be regulated similar to the other single-family zones relative to battery charging stations, transitional regulations, adult uses, and marijuana uses. Related updates to sections 19.65, 19.70, 19.75, 19.80,and 19.85 of the SVMC when CPA-2020-0007 was adopted were overlooked. This creates unintentional inconsistency throughout the SVMC in how the R-4 zone is regulated as compared to the other single-family residential zones. The proposed amendment will create consistent regulation applicable to all of the residential zones throughout Title 19. The following table provides a summary of the change to each section of the SVMC. Code Section Summary of change 19.65 Allows a battery charging station as an accessory use to a permitted use in the R-4 19.70 Applies the transitional regulations to MFR development where that development abuts the R-4 zone. Allows walkway and driveways in the front yard setback of the R-4 zone. Allows additional height for various structures such as cooling towers, roof gables,chimneys, and vent stacks in the R-4 zone. 19.75 Adds the R-4 zone to the zones in which the transitional regulations apply. The regulations include the ground level setback, the upper level setback, and use regulations that apply to the transitional setback. 19.80 Adds the R-4 zone to areas from which an adult use must remain 1,000 feet 19.85 Add the R-4 zone to zones that allow the production or processing of marijuana by any person pursuant to state law in a dwelling or accessory structure. A. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO THE MUNICIPAL CODE TEXT AMENDMENT L COMPLIANCE WITH TITLE 17 (GENERAL PROVISIONS) OF THE SPOKANE VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE a. Findings: SVMC 17.80.150(F)Municipal Code Text Amendment Approval Criteria Page 2 of 4 Staff Report and Recommendation CTA-2021-0001 r. The City may approve a Municipal Code Text amendment, if it finds that (1) The proposed text amendment is consistent with the applicable provisions of the Comprehensive Plan; Staff Analysis: The proposed amendment is supported by the Comprehensive Plan and is consistent with the following goals and policies: Goal LU-G4: Ensure that land use plans, regulations, review processes, and infrastructure improvements support economic growth and vitality. Policy LU-PS: Ensure compatibility between adjacent residential and commercial or industrial uses. Policy LU-P7: Protect residential neighborhoods from incompatible land uses and adverse impacts associated with transportation corridors. Policy LU-P9: Provide supportive regulations for new and innovative development types on commercial, industrial,and mixed-use land. Staff Analysis: The amendment is consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. (2) The proposed amendment bears a substantial relation to public health,safety, welfare, and protection of the environment; Staff Analysis: The amendment bears substantial relation to public health,safety, welfare and protection of the environment. The amendment will ensure that the transitional regulation is applied to all instances in which non-residential development occurs adjacent to residential development in the R-4 zone and ensures adult and marijuana use regulations will be properly applied in the R-4 zone. The amendment additionally clarifies that cargo shipping containers are not allowed in residential zones to protect the quality and character of residential neighborhoods. b. Conclusion(s): The proposed text amendment is consistent with the approval criteria contained in the SVMC 17.80.150(F). 3. COMPLIANCE WITH SVMC TITLE 21—ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROLS a. SVMC 21.20- State Environmental Policy Act The Planning Division has reviewed the proposed project and has determined that Based on WAC 197-11-800(19)(a)and the SEPA determination issued on February 21,2020 for CPA-2020-0007 no further environmental review is required. 2. Finding and Conclusions Specific to Public Comments a. Findings: No public comments have been received to date. b. Conclusion(s): Adequate public noticing was conducted for CTA-2021-0001 in accordance with adopted public noticing procedures. 3. Finding and Conclusions Specific to Agency Comments a, Findings: No agency comments have been received to date that identified any concerns or issues. b. Conclusion(s): No concerns have been noted. Page 3 of 4 Staff Report and Recommendation CTA-2021-0001 B. CONCLUSION For the reasons set forth in Section A, the proposed code text amendment to move regulatory standards for cargo shipping containers from SVMC 19.40.030, Accessory dwelling units,to SVMC 19.65.130 Residential, that addresses residential accessory structures, and adds the "R-4 zoning district" throughout Title 19 is consistent with the requirements of SVMC 17.80.150(F) and the Comprehensive Plan. Page 4 of 4 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: July 27, 2021 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ® new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Motion Consideration: Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) 2021 GOVERNING LEGISLATION: N/A PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Council approved JAG applications for the years 2009-2018. BACKGROUND: The City of Spokane Valley has been allocated $29,202 as part of the 2021 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) Program. These funds are designed to support all components of the criminal justice system. Spokane Valley staff has relied on recommendations of the Spokane Valley Police Chief to identify proposed projects to be funded with the grant. The Police Chief and the City Manager have recommended spending the funds to support Officer Safety and Wellness, an identified area of emphasis for the JAG. The components identified are lighting, cameras and access for the rear lot of the Spokane Valley Police Precinct, immediately to the south of the existing precinct building. Some of this work was performed utilizing the 2020 JAG but not all the work was able to be completed with those funds. As the award is for $25,000 or more, the duration is 48 months beginning October 1, 2020 (it has a retroactive start date). The award formula is based upon population and violent crime statistics for states. The state portion is then split, with local jurisdictions receiving 40% of the funds. The split between local jurisdictions is based upon each jurisdiction's proportion of the three-year violent crime average. OPTIONS: Consider whether to authorize staff to submit an application for the Justice Assistance Grant for items listed above or as modified. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to Authorize the City Manager or designee to Apply for the Justice Assistance Grant to purchase lighting and cameras to cover the Spokane Valley Police Precinct rear lot, immediately to the south of the existing precinct building. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: $29,202 in grant funds, no match required STAFF CONTACT: Morgan Koudelka, Senior Administrative Analyst ATTACHMENTS: JAG Solicitation, Allocation Sheet, Technical Report (Allocation Methodology) OMB No. 1121-0329 Approval Expires 11/30/2020 aror 9.d U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Bureau of Justice Assistance BJA FY 2021 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Program — Local Solicitation Assistance Listing Number # 16.738 Grants.gov Solicitation Number: O-BJA-2021-135004 Solicitation Release Date: June 08, 2021 5:00 PM Grants.gov Deadline: July 26, 2021 11:59 PM Application JustGrants Deadline: August 09, 2021 11:59 PM Overview The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), Office of Justice Programs (OJP), Bureau of Justice Assistance (BJA) is seeking applications for funding for the Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) Program. This program furthers the Department's mission by assisting state, local, and tribal law enforcement efforts to prevent or reduce crime and violence. This solicitation incorporates the OJP Grant Application Resource Guide by reference. The OJP Grant Application Resource Guide provides guidance to applicants on how to prepare and submit applications for funding to OJP. If this solicitation expressly modifies any provision in the OJP Grant Application Resource Guide, the applicant is to follow the guidelines in this solicitation as to that provision. This solicitation expressly modifies the OJP Grant Application Resource Guide by not incorporating the "Limitation on Use of Award Funds for Employee Compensation; Waiver" provisions in the "Financial Information" section of the OJP Grant Application Resource Guide. Solicitation Category Competition Category Number Dollar Amount Performance Performance ID of for Award Start Date Duration Awards (Months) C-BJA-2021- Category 1 - 603 $45,735,895.00 10/1/2020 24 00149-PROD Applicants with 12:00 AM eligible allocation Competition Category Number Dollar Amount Performance Performance ID of for Award Start Date Duration Awards (Months) amounts of less than $25,000 C-BJA- Category 2 - 582 $44,143,102.00 10/1/2020 48 2021- Applicants with 12:00 AM 00150- eligible allocation PROD amounts of $25,000 or more Eligibility (Who may apply): • Units of local government • Other By law, for purposes of the JAG Program, the term "units of local government" includes a town, township, village, parish, city, county, borough, or other general-purpose political subdivision of a state; or it may be a federally recognized Indian tribal government that performs law enforcement functions (as determined by the Secretary of the Interior). A unit of local government also may be any law enforcement district or judicial enforcement district established under applicable state law with authority to independently establish a budget and impose taxes; for example, in Louisiana, a unit of local government means a district attorney or parish sheriff. The expected eligible allocations by state for the fiscal year (FY) 2021 JAG Program can be found at: https://bja.ojp.gov/program/jag/fy-2021-allocations. Eligible allocations under JAG are posted annually on the JAG web page. See the allocation determination and Units of Local Government requirements section for more information. Applicants with eligible allocation amounts of less than $25,000 will apply to Category 1, and applicants with eligible allocation amounts of$25,000 or more will apply to Category 2. All recipients and subrecipients (including any for-profit organization) must forgo any profit or management fee. Agency Contact Description For technical assistance with submitting the SF-424 and SF-LLL in Grants.gov, contact the Grants.gov Customer Support Hotline at 800-518-4726, 606-545-5035, Grants.gov customer support web page, or email at support@grants.gov. The Grants.gov Support Hotline operates 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, except on federal holidays. For technical assistance with submitting the full application in DOJ's Justice Grants System (JustGrants), contact the JustGrants Service Desk at JustGrants.Support@usdoj.gov or 833- 872-5175. The JustGrants Service Desk operates 5 a.m. to 9.p.m. eastern time, Monday— Friday, and 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. Saturday, Sunday, and federal holidays. An applicant that experiences unforeseen Grants.gov or JustGrants technical issues beyond its control that prevent it from submitting its application by the deadline must email the National Criminal Justice Reference Service Response Center (Response Center) at grants@ncjrs.gov 2 within 24 hours after the application deadline to request approval to submit its application after the deadline. For assistance with any other requirements of this solicitation, contact the Response Center by telephone at 800-851-3420 or TTY: 301-240-6310 (hearing impaired only) or by email at grants@ncjrs.gov. Response Center hours of operation are 10 a.m. to 6 p.m. eastern time Monday through Friday, and 10 a.m. to 8 p.m. eastern time on the solicitation close date. Applicants also may contact the appropriate BJA grant manager. Submission Information In FY 2021, applications will be submitted to DOJ in a NEW two-step process. Step 1: Applicants will submit an SF-424 and an SF-LLL in Grants.gov at https://www.grants.gov/web/grants/register.html. To register in Grants.gov, applicants will need to obtain a Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) and System for Award Management (SAM) registration or renewal. Step 2: Applicants will submit the full application, including attachments, in JustGrants at https://justicegrants.usdoj.gov/. To be considered timely, the full application must be submitted in JustGrants by the JustGrants application deadline. OJP encourages applicants to review the "How to Apply" section in the OJP Grant Application Resource Guide. 3 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Program FY 2021 Local Formula Grant Solicitation CFDA # 16.738 Program Description Overview The Department of Justice is committed to advancing work that promotes civil rights, increases access to justice, supports crime victims, protects the public from crime and evolving threats, and builds trust between law enforcement and the community. The Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) Program is the primary provider of federal criminal justice funding to states and units of local government. BJA will award JAG Program funds to eligible units of local government as described in this FY 2021 JAG Program Local Solicitation. (BJA will issue a separate solicitation for states.) Statutory Authority The JAG Program is authorized by Title I of Pub. L. No. 90-351 (generally codified at 34 U.S.C. 10151-10726), including subpart 1 of part E (codified at 34 U.S.C. 10151-10158); see also 28 U.S.C. 530C(a). Program-specific Information Statutory Formula JAG awards are based on a statutory formula that is fully described within the JAG Technical Report. Once each fiscal year's overall JAG Program funding level is determined, BJA works with the Bureau of Justice Statistics to begin a four-step grant award calculation process, which, in general, consists of: (1) Computing an initial JAG allocation for each state, based on its share of violent crime and population (weighted equally). (2) Reviewing the initial JAG allocation amount to determine if the state allocation is less than the minimum award amount defined in the JAG legislation (0.25 percent of the total). If this is the case, the state is funded at the minimum level, and the funds required for this are deducted from the overall pool of JAG funds. Each of the remaining states receives the minimum award plus an additional amount based on its share of violent crime and population. (3) Dividing each state's final award amount (except for the territories and the District of Columbia) between the state and its units of local governments at rates of 60 and 40 percent, respectively. (4) Determining unit of local government award allocations, which are based on their proportion of the state's 3-year violent crime average. If the "eligible award amount" for a particular unit of local government, as determined on this basis, is $10,000 or more, then the unit of local government is eligible to apply directly to OJP (under the JAG Local 4 Solicitation) for a JAG award. If the "eligible award amount" for a particular unit of local government, as determined on this basis, is less than $10,000, however, the funds are not made available for a direct award to that particular unit of local government, but instead are added to the amount that is awarded to the state. Allocation Determination and Units of Local Government Requirements Regarding Use of JAG Funds Eligible allocations under JAG are posted annually on the JAG web page. Award allocations are determined by a four-step statutory formula. Additional information can be found on the JAG Resource Page or the JAG Technical Report. According to the JAG Program statute, a "disparity" may exist between the funding eligibility of a county and its associated municipalities. See 34 U.S.C. § 10156(d)(4). Units of local government identified by BJA as disparate must select a fiscal agent that will submit a joint application for the allocation to include all disparate municipalities. A memorandum of understanding (MOU) that identifies which jurisdiction will serve as the applicant or fiscal agent for joint funds must be completed and signed by the authorized representative for each participating jurisdiction. Once an award is made, the fiscal agent will be responsible for distributing award funds to the other jurisdictions in the disparate group through subawards that include all appropriate award conditions. To verify eligibility on the JAG web page, an applicant should click on its respective state and note the following regarding the state's allocation table: (1) Disparate units of local government are listed in shaded groups, in alphabetic order by county. Units of local government identified as disparate must select one unit of local government to submit an application on behalf of the disparate group. (2) Counties that have an asterisk (*) under the "Direct Allocation" column did not submit the level of violent crime data to qualify for a direct award from BJA but are in the disparate grouping indicated by the shaded area. The JAG legislation requires these counties to remain a partner with the local jurisdictions receiving funds and must be a signatory on the required MOU. (3) Direct allocations are listed alphabetically below the shaded disparate groupings. Please note that disparate jurisdictions do not need to abide by the listed individual allocations, which are provided for information only. Jurisdictions in a funding disparity are responsible for determining individual amounts within the Eligible Joint Allocation and documenting individual allocations in the MOU. Statutory Program Areas In general, JAG funds awarded to a unit of local government under the FY 2021 program may be used to hire additional personnel and/or purchase equipment, supplies, contractual support, training, technical assistance, and information systems for criminal justice, including for any one or more of the following program areas: • Law enforcement programs • Prosecution and court programs • Prevention and education programs • Corrections and community corrections programs • Drug treatment and enforcement programs • Planning, evaluation, and technology improvement programs • Crime victim and witness programs (other than compensation) 5 • Mental health programs and related law enforcement and corrections programs, including behavioral programs and crisis intervention teams Note that the statute defines "criminal justice" as "activities pertaining to crime prevention, control, or reduction, or the enforcement of the criminal law, including, but not limited to, police efforts to prevent, control, or reduce crime or to apprehend criminals, including juveniles, activities of courts having criminal jurisdiction, and related agencies (including but not limited to prosecutorial and defender services, juvenile delinquency agencies, and pretrial service or release agencies), activities of corrections, probation, or parole authorities and related agencies assisting in the rehabilitation, supervision, and care of criminal offenders, and programs relating to the prevention, control, or reduction of narcotic addiction and juvenile delinquency." BJA Areas of Emphasis BJA recognizes that many state and local criminal justice systems currently face challenging fiscal environments and that an important, cost-effective way to relieve those pressures is to share or leverage resources through cooperation among federal, state, and local law enforcement. BJA intends to focus much of its work on: Restoring Justice—Support for State, Local, Tribal, and Territorial Administration (SLTT) of Criminal Justice; Community Violence Intervention; Law Enforcement Accreditation, Policy Development, and Training; Technologies to Support Transparency and Information Sharing between Law Enforcement and Communities; Sustaining COVID-19 Criminal Justice Innovations; and Innovative Forensic Technologies such as Rapid DNA for Booking Stations. BJA encourages each state recipient of an FY 2021 JAG award to join federal law enforcement agencies across the board in addressing these challenges. Additional details on the BJA areas of emphasis can be found below: • Restoring Justice—Support for SLTT Administration of Criminal Justice In March 2020, SLTT governments began implementing various community mitigation policies to prevent and reduce the spread of COVID-19. As a part of these restrictions, throughout the country, courts at every level were forced to cancel or significantly scale back proceedings, which commonly included suspending in-person hearings, granting extensions of court deadlines and waivers of speedy trials, restricting access to court buildings, and postponing jury trials. This created a backlog of cases, which has impacts on criminal court operations and court staff, victims and witnesses, as well as defendants. BJA encourages state and local jurisdictions to invest JAG funds in efforts to restore justice by addressing this backlog. This could include purchase of technology to enhance the use of virtual tools to conduct outreach to witnesses and defendants, as well as for hearings and status conferences, staffing, and enhancing access to services; resources to assist the jurisdiction to develop or enhance its case management system to assess and work to eliminate the backlog of cases; building tools to support diversion and alternatives to incarceration as part of the review of backlogged cases; and technology and equipment to retrofit court houses and staff to mitigate risks to staff and those coming to court. • Community Violence Intervention Cities across the U.S. are experiencing a historic spike in homicides and gun violence that disproportionately impacts people of color. The recent high-profile mass shootings in Boulder (taking the lives of 10 individuals) and Atlanta (taking the lives of eight individuals, including six Asian American women) underscored the relentlessness of this epidemic. As a result, the Biden-Harris Administration and Department of Justice are undertaking a number of steps to keep guns out of the hands of criminals, reduce the risk of gun violence, and prioritize investment in community violence intervention (CVI). There are proven CVI strategies for reducing gun violence through tools other than 6 incarceration. For example, violence interruption programs deploy trusted messengers to work directly with individuals most likely to commit gun violence, intervene in conflicts, and connect people to social and economic services to reduce the likelihood of gun violence as an answer. Hospital-based violence interventions engage people who have been shot while they are still in the hospital, connecting them to services to decrease the likelihood that they commit gun violence or are victimized in the future. BJA encourages state and local jurisdictions to invest JAG funds to tailor programs and responses to CVI in an effort to build strong, sustained partnerships with community residents and organizations to support CVI work in communities most impacted by violent crime. CVI strategies will be highlighted on BJA's National Training and Technical Assistance Center (NTTAC) website, and jurisdictions looking to implement those strategies can request training and technical assistance (TTA) on the NTTAC website as well. • Law Enforcement Accreditation, Policy Development, and Training The calls for police reform continue to grow, with an emphasis on protecting the sanctity of life and eliminating systemic biases, implicit or otherwise. In particular, racial profiling and related bias are particularly pernicious as they deprive communities of color of basic constitutional protections and erode confidence in policing — an essential cornerstone for crime reduction and safe communities. BJA encourages state and local jurisdictions to utilize JAG funds for the purposes of law enforcement accreditation, and developing and maintaining policies and law enforcement training focused on addressing those areas most likely to promote trust, transparency, and accountability, including use of force, racial profiling, implicit bias, procedural justice, and duty to intervene. • Technologies to Support Transparency and Information Sharing between Law Enforcement and Communities This will focus on software/hardware solutions designed to enhance agency transparency with the capability of facilitating information sharing with the public, promoting an agency's work, and developing data-driven programs that improve public safety and build trust. Examples could include the sharing of information about crime statistics, locations of criminal activity, aggregated information regarding internal affairs complaints, resolution of cases and issues in the community, support for community surveys, and outreach to residents to gather their feedback. • Sustaining COVID-19 Criminal Justice Innovations As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, SLTT criminal justice agencies made strides to create innovative ways to administer justice while balancing the need to mitigate the coronavirus and maintain social distancing. While many of these innovations had an upfront cost, they will prove to be cost saving and efficient over time. For example, correctional facilities have enabled virtual programming, education, medical appointments, and family visits, as well as increased and enhanced the use of electronic monitoring. Police departments have hosted virtual community engagement events and opportunities, and courts and community corrections have increased the use of virtual staffing, status hearings, client visits, and access to treatment and support services. In addition, resources have supported the purchase of technology like headsets and hotspots to ensure confidentiality of defense counsel with clients, as well as partnerships with community partners to host outdoor events like drug court graduations. It is important for SLTT agencies to sustain these cost-saving efficiencies that resulted from the COVID-19 pandemic. As such, BJA encourages SLTT agencies to utilize JAG funds for these sustainment activities. • Innovative Forensic Technologies such as Rapid DNA for Booking Stations 7 Rapid DNA, or Rapid DNA analysis, is a term used to describe the fully automated (hands free) process of developing a DNA profile from a reference sample mouth swab in 1-2 hours without the need of a DNA laboratory and without any human intervention. The overall goal of the Rapid DNA initiative is to immediately enroll qualifying arrestees in CODIS and search unsolved crimes of special concern in near real time during the booking process. The FBI worked with numerous stakeholder groups to develop Standards for the Operation of Rapid DNA Booking Systems by Law Enforcement Booking Agencies, the corresponding Audit Document for these standards, and the National Rapid DNA Booking Operational Procedures Manual for the FBI approval and operation of the Rapid DNA devices in booking agencies. Below is an abbreviated list of prerequisites for federal, state, and local booking agencies to participate in Rapid DNA: • The state must have implemented an arrestee DNA collection law that authorizes DNA sample collection from a person arrested for a specified offense at the time of arrest and for which there are no additional requirements (i.e., determination of probable cause) for the analysis of that arrestee DNA sample. Federal booking agencies already meet this prerequisite. • Electronic Fingerprint (Live Scan) integration during the booking process for obtaining State Identification Numbers (SID) (UCN for federal booking agencies) from the State Identification Bureau (FBI for federal) in near real time. • The booking agency must have network connectivity with the State Identification Bureau (SIB)/CJIS Systems Agency (CSA). • The booking agency and/or state must technically integrate Rapid DNA within their automated fingerprint process in a way that must ensure only qualifying arrestees are processed. It will be critical for booking agencies to work with their state CODIS agency to ensure all requirements are met for participation in Rapid DNA (see National Rapid DNA Booking Operational Procedures Manual). BJA encourages those states with arrestee DNA collection laws that meet the prerequisites above to consider using JAG funds to implement Rapid DNA technology (or the defined prerequisites above, such as Live Scan integration) in booking stations within their states. Additional Uses of JAG Funds JAG funds awarded to a unit of local government under this FY 2021 solicitation may be used to: • Enforce state and local laws that establish offenses similar to offenses established in 21 U.S.C. § 801 et seq. and/or improve the functioning of the criminal justice system, with emphasis on violent crime and serious offenses, by providing additional personnel, equipment, training, technical assistance, and information systems for the more widespread apprehension, prosecution, adjudication, detention, and rehabilitation of persons who violate these laws, and assist the victims of such crimes (other than compensation). • Support projects related to preventing, detecting, seizing, and/or stopping the presence and use of contraband cellphones by detainees and inmates. This includes the purchasing of managed access systems and other mitigation technologies (as permitted by applicable law). 8 • To purchase fentanyl detection equipment and training for law enforcement safety, as well as naloxone distribution. • To purchase drug detection canines to combat the rise of drug trafficking, including that of methamphetamines. • Additionally, JAG funds awarded under this FY 2021 solicitation may be used for any purpose indicated here: https://bia.oip.gov/sites/g/files/xyckuh186/files/media/document/iag-use-of-funds.pdf. Limitations on the Use of JAG Funds Administrative Costs Up to 10 percent of a JAG award, including up to 10 percent of any earned interest, may be used for costs associated with administering the award, which can include indirect costs. Supplanting JAG funds may not be used to supplant state or local funds but must be used to increase the amounts of such funds that would, in the absence of federal funds, be made available. See the JAG FAQs for examples of supplanting. Although supplanting is prohibited, the leveraging of federal funding is encouraged. Matching Funds Absent specific federal statutory authority to do so, JAG award funds may not be used as a match for other federal awards. Prohibited Expenditures and Associated Procedures under JAG JAG funds may not be used (whether directly or indirectly) for any purpose prohibited by federal statute or regulation, including those purposes specifically prohibited by the JAG Program statute as set out at 34 U.S.C. § 10152. JAG funds may not be used (directly or indirectly) for security enhancements or equipment for nongovernmental entities not engaged in criminal justice or public safety. Additionally, JAG funds may not be used (directly or indirectly) to pay for any of the following items unless DOJ certifies that extraordinary and exigent circumstances exist making them essential to the maintenance of public safety and good order: • Vehicles, vessels, or aircraft* • Luxury items • Real estate • Construction projects (other than penal or correctional institutions) • Any similar matters *Police cruisers, police boats, and police helicopters are allowable vehicles under JAG and do not require BJA certification. The JAG statute, 34 U.S.C. §§ 10151-10158, specifically identifies a list of prohibited items, including unmanned aircraft, unmanned aerial vehicles, and unmanned aerial systems, which cannot be purchased with JAG funds unless the BJA Director certifies that extraordinary and exigent circumstances exist that make the use of such funds to purchase these prohibited items essential to the maintenance of public safety and good order. Additional information on prohibited expenditures under JAG, including the process to obtain prior approval to purchase a prohibited item(s), can be found within the JAG Prohibited Expenditures Guidance or within the JAG FAQs document (see Use of Funds section). Other Program Requirements 9 Trust Fund — States (or State Administering Agencies) or units of local government may draw down JAG funds either in advance or on a reimbursement basis. To draw down in advance, a trust fund must be established in which to deposit the funds. The trust fund must be in an interest-bearing account, unless one of the exceptions in 2 C.F.R. § 200.305(b)(8) apply. If subrecipients draw down JAG funds in advance, they also must establish a trust fund in which to deposit the funds. For additional information, see 2 C.F.R. 200.305. Certifications and Assurances by the Chief Executive of the Applicant Government (which incorporates the 30-day governing body review requirement) —A JAG application is not complete, and a unit of local government may not access award funds, unless the chief executive of the applicant unit of local government (e.g., the mayor or chairman) properly executes, and the unit of local government submits, the "Certifications and Assurances by the Chief Executive of the Applicant Government." The most up-to-date version of this certification can be found at: https://bja.ojp.qov/proqram/jaq/certifications-assurances. Please note that this certification takes the place of the review narrative attachment and contains assurances that the governing body notification and public comment requirements, which are required under the JAG statute (at 34 U.S.C. § 10153(a)(2)), have been satisfied. OJP will not deny an application for an FY 2021 award for failure to submit these "Certifications and Assurances by the Chief Executive of the Applicant Government" by the application deadline, but a unit of local government will not be able to access award funds (and its award will include a condition that withholds funds) until it submits these certifications and assurances, properly executed by the chief executive of the unit of local government (e.g., mayor or chairman). Body-Worn Cameras (BWCs) —A JAG award recipient that proposes to use FY 2021 funds to purchase BWC equipment or implement or enhance BWC programs must provide to OJP a certification(s) that each direct recipient receiving the equipment or implementing the program has policies and procedures in place related to BWC equipment usage, data storage and access, privacy considerations, and training. The certification form related to BWC policies and procedures can be found at: https://bja.ojp.gov/sites/q/files/xyckuh186/files/media/document/fy- 21-jaq-body-worn-camera-policy-cert.pdf. A JAG award recipient that proposes to use funds for BWC-related expenses will have funds withheld until the required certification is submitted and approved by OJP. If the JAG award recipient proposes to change project activities to utilize JAG funds for BWC-related expenses after the award is accepted, the JAG award recipient must submit the signed certification to OJP at that time. Further, before making any subaward for BWC-related expenses, the JAG award recipient must collect a completed BWC certification from the proposed subrecipient. Any such certifications must be maintained by the JAG award recipient and made available to OJP upon request. The BJA BWC Tool Kit provides model BWC policies and best practices to assist criminal justice departments in implementing BWC programs. Apart from the JAG Program, BJA provides funds under the Body-Worn Camera Policy and Implementation Program (BWCPIP). BWCPIP allows jurisdictions to develop and implement policies and practices required for effective program adoption, and to address program factors including the purchase, deployment, and maintenance of camera systems and equipment; data 10 storage and access; and privacy considerations. Interested JAG award recipients may wish to refer to the BWC Program web page for more information. JAG award recipients that are also BWC award recipients may not use JAG funds for any part of the 50 percent match required by the BWC Program. Body Armor— Body armor purchased with JAG funds may be purchased at any threat level, make, or model from any distributor or manufacturer, as long as the following requirements are met: The body armor must have been tested and found to comply with the latest applicable National Institute of Justice ballistic or stab standards. In addition, body armor purchased must be made in the United States. Finally, body armor purchased with JAG funds must be "uniquely fitted vests," which means protective (ballistic or stab-resistant) armor vests that conform to the individual wearer to provide the best possible fit and coverage through a combination of: (1) correctly sized panels and carrier determined through appropriate measurement, and (2) properly adjusted straps, harnesses, fasteners, flaps, or other adjustable features. Note that the requirement that body armor be "uniquely fitted" does not necessarily require body armor that is individually manufactured based on the measurements of an individual wearer. In support of OJP's efforts to improve officer safety, the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) International has made available the Standard Practice for Body Armor Wearer Measurement and Fitting of Armor (Active Standard ASTM E3003) at no cost. The Personal Armor Fit Assessment checklist is excerpted from ASTM E3003. A JAG award recipient that proposes to use FY 2021 award funds to purchase body armor must provide OJP with a certification(s) that each law enforcement agency receiving body armor has a written "mandatory wear" policy in effect. See 34 U.S.C. § 10202(c). The certification form related to mandatory wear can be found at https://bja.oj p.gov/sites/g/files/xyckuh 186/files/media/document/fy-21-jag-body-armor- mandatory-wear-cert.pdf. Note: A JAG award recipient that proposes to use funds for the purchase of body armor will have funds withheld until the required certification is submitted and approved by OJP. If the JAG award recipient proposes to change project activities to utilize funds for the purchase of body armor after the award is accepted, the award recipient must submit the signed certification to OJP at that time. Further, before making any subaward for the purchase of body armor, the JAG award recipient must collect a completed mandatory wear certification from the proposed subrecipient. Any such certifications must be maintained by the JAG award recipient and made available to OJP upon request. A mandatory wear concept and issues paper and a model policy are available from the Bulletproof Vest Partnership (BVP) Customer Support Center, which can be contacted at vests@usdoj.gov or toll free at 1-877-758-3787. Additional information and FAQs related to the mandatory wear policy and certifications can be found at https://bja.ojp.gov/program/jag/frequently-asked-questions. Apart from the JAG Program, BJA provides funds under the Bulletproof Vest Partnership Program. The BVP Program provides funding to state and local law enforcement agencies for the purchase of ballistic-resistant and stab-resistant body armor. For more information on the BVP Program, including eligibility and an application, refer to the BVP web page. JAG award recipients should note, however, that funds may not be used as any part of the 50 percent match required by the BVP Program. Interoperable Communications — Units of local government (including any subrecipients) that 11 are using FY 2021 JAG funds for emergency communications activities should comply with the SAFECOM Guidance for Emergency Communication Grants (SAFECOM Guidance), including provisions on technical standards that ensure and enhance interoperable communications. The SAFECOM Guidance is an essential resource for entities applying for federal financial assistance for emergency communications projects. It provides general information on eligible activities, technical standards, and other terms and conditions that are common to most federal emergency communications programs. Specifically, the SAFECOM Guidance provides guidance to applicants on: • Recommendations for planning, coordinating, and implementing projects • Emergency communications activities that can be funded through federal grants • Best practices, policies, and technical standards that help to improve interoperability • Resources to help grant recipients comply with technical standards and grant requirements SAFECOM Guidance is recognized as the primary guidance on emergency communications grants by the Administration, Office of Management and Budget, and federal grant program offices. The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) updates the document every year in close coordination with federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial stakeholders and partners. SAFECOM Guidance is applicable to all federal grants funding emergency communications. The most recent version of the SAFECOM Guidance is available at: https://www.cisa.gov/safecom/funding. Additionally, emergency communications projects funded with FY 2021 JAG funds should support the Statewide Communication Interoperability Plan (SCIP) and be coordinated with the full-time statewide interoperability coordinator (SWIC) in the state of the project. As the central coordination point for a state's interoperability effort, the SWIC plays a critical role and can serve as a valuable resource. SWICs are responsible for the implementation of SCIP through coordination and collaboration with the emergency response community. CISA maintains a list of SWICs for each state and territory. Contact ecd@cisa.dhs.gov for more information. All communications equipment purchased with FY 2021 JAG Program funding should be identified during the quarterly performance measurement reporting. Further, information-sharing projects funded with FY 2021 JAG funds must comply with DOJ's Global Justice Information Sharing Initiative guidelines, as applicable, in order to promote information sharing and enable interoperability among disparate systems across the justice and public safety communities. Recipients (and subrecipients) must conform to the Global Standards Package (GSP) and all constituent elements, where applicable, as described at https://it.oip.gov/gsp grantcondition. Recipients (and subrecipients) will be required to document their planned approaches to information sharing, describe their compliance with GSP, and document an appropriate privacy policy that protects shared information or provide detailed justification for why an alternative approach is recommended. DNA Testing of Evidentiary Materials and Uploading DNA Profiles to a Database — If JAG Program funds are to be used for DNA testing of evidentiary materials, any resulting eligible DNA profiles must be uploaded to the Combined DNA Index System (CODIS, the national DNA database operated by the FBI) by a government DNA lab with access to CODIS. No profiles generated with JAG funding may be entered into any other nongovernmental DNA database without prior written approval from BJA (exceptions include forensic genealogy). For more information about DNA testing as it pertains to JAG, please refer to the JAG FAQs. Entry of Records into State Repositories —As appropriate and to the extent consistent with law, 12 a special condition will be imposed that would require the following: Any program or activity that receives federal financial assistance under JAG that is likely to generate court dispositions or other records relevant to National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS) determinations, including any dispositions or records that involve any noncitizen or migrant who is undocumented in the United States (18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(5)(A), must have a system in place to ensure that all such NICS-relevant dispositions or records are made available in a timely fashion. Potential Set-Asides and/or Funding Reductions National Incident-Based Reporting System 3 Percent Set-Aside In FY 2016, the FBI formally announced its intention to sunset the Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Program's traditional Summary Reporting System (SRS) and replace it with the UCR Program's National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS). As of January 1, 2021, the FBI's NIBRS is the law enforcement crime data reporting standard for the nation, and SRS data are no longer accepted by the UCR Program. By statute, JAG Program awards are calculated using summary Part 1 violent crime data from the FBI's UCR Program. (See 34 U.S.C. § 10156.) Eventually, JAG Program awards will be calculated using NIBRS data and NIBRS compliance will impact JAG Program eligibility. Beginning in FY 2018, BJA required, through the application of an award condition, direct JAG award recipients not certified by the FBI as NIBRS compliant to set aside 3 percent of their JAG award toward achieving full compliance with the FBI's NIBRS data submission requirements under the UCR Program. The 3 percent set-aside will continue in FY 2021 to help ensure remaining states and units of local government become NIBRS compliant. Units of local government must clearly indicate in their application narratives and budgets what projects will be supported with this 3 percent set-aside. The following are examples of costs and projects relating to NIBRS implementation at the state or local level that could be funded under the JAG Program: software, hardware, and labor that directly support or enhance a state or agency's technical capacity for collecting, processing, and analyzing data reported by local law enforcement (LE) agencies and then submitting NIBRS data to the FBI; training personnel responsible for the state's Incident-Based Reporting (IBR) program on receiving, processing, analyzing, and validating incident-based data from local LE agencies in their state; training local agencies on how to collect and submit NIBRS data; and technical assistance for LE agency personnel responsible for (1) managing the agency's crime incident data, (2) processing and validating the data, and (3) extracting and submitting IBR data to the state UCR Program according to the state's standard and/or directly to the FBI according to the NIBRS standard. BJA will waive the set-aside requirement for units of local government that have been certified as NIBRS compliant by the FBI as of the posting date of the Local JAG Program solicitation. Units of local government that achieve full compliance with NIBRS after receiving an award should email evidence of NIBRS compliance (written documentation from the FBI that certifies NIBRS compliance) to their State Policy Advisor listed in the JustGrants System. Upon review of the documentation submitted, BJA will confirm the NIBRS compliance and then take the necessary action to clear any withholding special condition associated with the NIBRS set-aside requirement. Units of local government must retain documentation on file that demonstrates the FBI certification of NIBRS compliance. Such documentation must be made available for BJA review upon request. If approved, units of local government will not be subject to the 3 percent 13 set-aside requirement. Goals, Objectives, and Deliverables Goals In general, the FY 2021 JAG Program is designed to provide units of local government with additional personnel, equipment, supplies, contractual support, training, technical assistance, and information systems for criminal justice. Although the JAG Program provides assistance directly to states, through pass-through (and similar) requirements, the JAG Program also is designed to assist units of local government with respect to their criminal justice needs. Objectives The objectives are directly related to the JAG Program accountability measures described at https://bia.oip.gov/sites/g/files/xyckuh186/files/media/document/iag-pmt-accountability- measures.pdf and demonstrate the results of the work completed, as discussed under What an Application Should Include. The goals and objectives are directly related to the performance measures that demonstrate the results of the work completed, as discussed under the Application and Submission Information section. Deliverables A unit of local government that receives an FY 2021 JAG award will be required to produce various types of reports, including quarterly financial reports, quarterly performance reports, and semiannual progress reports in JustGrants. Evidence-based Programs or Practices OJP strongly emphasizes the use of data and evidence in policymaking and program development in criminal justice, juvenile justice, and crime victim services. For additional information and resources on evidence-based programs or practices, see the OJP Grant Application Resource Guide. Information Regarding Potential Evaluation of Programs and Activities OJP may conduct or support an evaluation of the programs and activities funded under this solicitation. For additional information, see the OJP Grant Application Resource Guide section entitled "Information Regarding Potential Evaluation of Programs and Activities." Federal Award Information Total number of awards BJA expects to make: 1,185 potential awards Maximum dollar amount for each award: $4,095,916 (New York City) Total amount to be awarded under solicitation: $89,878,997 Period of performance start date: October 1, 2020 Period of performance duration: 24-48 months Category 1 — Eligible Allocation Amounts of Less than $25,000: Units of local government that are listed on the JAG web page as eligible for an allocation amount of less than $25,000 should apply under Category 1. This includes direct and joint (disparate) allocations. Category 1 awards of less than $25,000 are 2 years in length. Extensions of up to 2 years can be requested for these awards via JustGrants no fewer than 30 days prior to the grant end date and will be automatically granted upon request. 14 Category 2 — Eligible Allocation Amounts of$25,000 or More: Units of local government that are listed on the JAG web page as eligible for an allocation amount of$25,000 or more should apply under Category 2. This includes direct and joint (disparate) allocations. Category 2 awards of at least $25,000 are 4 years in length. Extensions beyond this period may be made on a case-by-case basis at the discretion of the Bureau of Justice Assistance and must be requested via JustGrants no fewer than 30 days prior to the grant end date. All awards are subject to the availability of appropriated funds and to any modifications or additional requirements that may be imposed by statute. Availability of Funds This solicitation, and awards (if any are made) under this solicitation, are subject to the availability of appropriated funds and any modifications or additional requirements that may be imposed by the agency or by law. In addition, nothing in this solicitation is intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person. The allocations by state for the FY 2021 JAG Program can be found at: https://bja.ojp.gov/sites/g/files/xycku h 186/files/media/document/FY21-State-JAG- Allocations.pdf. Type of Award BJA expects to make awards under this solicitation as grants. See the "Administrative, National Policy, and Other Legal Requirements" section of the OJP Grant Application Resource Guide for a brief discussion of important statutes, regulations, and award conditions that apply to many (or in some cases, all) OJP grants (and cooperative agreements). Financial Management and System of Internal Controls Award recipients and subrecipients (including recipients or subrecipients that are pass-through entities) must, as described in the Part 200 Uniform Requirements as set out at 2 C.F.R. 200.303, comply with standards for financial and program management. The "Part 200 Uniform Requirements" means the DOJ regulation at 2 C.F.R. Part 2800, which adopts (with certain modifications) the provisions of 2 C.F.R. Part 200. See OJP Grant Application Resource Guide for additional information. Budget Information This solicitation expressly modifies the OJP Grant Application Resource Guide by not incorporating the "Limitation on Use of Award Funds for Employee Compensation; Waiver" provision in the "Financial Information" section of the OJP Grant Application Resource Guide. Cost Sharing or Matching Requirement This solicitation does not require a match. Pre-agreement Costs (also known as Pre-award Costs) See the OJP Grant Application Resource Guide for information on Pre-agreement Costs (also known as Pre-award Costs). Prior Approval, Planning, and Reporting of Conference/Meeting/Training Costs 15 See the OJP Grant Application Resource Guide for information on Prior Approval, Planning, and Reporting of Conference/Meeting/Training Costs. Costs Associated with Language Assistance (if applicable) See the OJP Grant Application Resource Guide for information on Costs Associated with Language Assistance. Eligibility Information For eligibility information, see the solicitation cover page. For information on cost sharing or matching requirements, see Federal Award Information. Application and Submission Information Content of Application Submission See the Application Elements and Formatting Instructions section of the OJP Grant Application Resource Guide for information on what happens to an application that does not contain all the specified elements or that is nonresponsive to the scope of the solicitation. Information to Complete the Application for Federal Assistance (Standard Form (SF)- 424) in Grants.gov. The SF-424 will be submitted in Grants.gov. The SF-424 is a required standard form used as a cover sheet for submission of pre-applications, applications, and related information. See the OJP Grant Application Resource Guide for additional information on completing the SF-424. In Section F of the SF-424, please include the name and contact information of the individual who will complete application materials in JustGrants. JustGrants will use this information (email address) to assign the application to this user in JustGrants. Intergovernmental Review: This solicitation ("funding opportunity") is subject to Executive Order 12372. An applicant may find the names and addresses of state Single Points of Contact (SPOCs) at the following website: https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp- content/uploads/2020/04/SPOC-4-13-20.pdf. If the applicant's state appears on the SPOC list, the applicant must contact the state SPOC to find out about, and comply with, the state's process under E.O. 12372. In completing the SF-424, an applicant whose state appears on the SPOC list is to make the appropriate selection in response to question 19, once the applicant has complied with its state E.O. 12372 process. (An applicant whose state does not appear on the SPOC list should answer question 19 by selecting the response that the: "Program is subject to E.O. 12372 but has not been selected by the State for review.") Standard Applicant Information (JustGrants 424 and General Agency Information) The Standard Applicant Information section of the JustGrants application is pre-populated with the SF-424 data submitted in Grants.gov. Applicants will need to review the Standard Applicant Information in JustGrants and make edits as needed. Within this section, applicants will need to: add zip codes for areas affected by the project; confirm their Authorized Representative; and verify the organizations legal name and address. Proposal Narrative 16 The proposal narrative should be submitted as an attachment in JustGrants. The attached document should be double-spaced, using a standard 12-point Times New Roman font, and have no less than 1-inch margins. Pages should be numbered and submitted as an attachment Category 1 — Eligible Allocation Amounts of Less than $25.000 The proposal narrative for Category 1 applications should include a description of the project(s), including subawards, if applicable, to be funded with JAG funds over the 2-year grant period. Cateaory 2— Eliaible Allocation Amounts of $25.000 or More The proposal narrative for Category 2 applications should include: a. Description of the Issue— Identify the unit of local government's strategy/funding priorities for the FY 2021 JAG funds, the subgrant award process (if applicable, including disparates) and timeline, any progress or challenges, and a description of the programs to be funded over the 2- to 4-year grant period. b. Project Design and Implementation — Describe the unit of local government's strategic planning process, if any, that guides its priorities and funding strategy. This should include a description of how the local community is engaged in the planning process and the data and analysis utilized to support the plan. It should identify the stakeholders currently participating in the strategic planning process, the gaps in the needed resources for criminal justice purposes, and how JAG funds will be coordinated with state and related justice funds. c. Capabilities and Competencies — Describe any additional strategic planning/coordination efforts in which the units of local government participate with other criminal justice/juvenile justice agencies in the state. d. Plan for Collecting the Data Required for this Solicitation's Performance Measures — OJP will require each successful applicant to submit specific performance data that demonstrate the results of the work carried out under the award. The performance data directly relate to the objectives previously identified under "Objectives." Applicants should visit OJP's performance measurement page at www.oip.qov/performance for an overview of performance measurement activities at OJP. The application should demonstrate the applicant's understanding of the performance data reporting requirements for this grant program and detail how the applicant will gather the required data should it receive funding. Note: Applicants are not required to submit performance data with the application. Rather, performance measures information is included as an alert that successful applicants will be required to submit performance data as part of the reporting requirements under an award. OJP will require each successful applicant to submit regular performance data that demonstrate the results of the work carried out under the award. The performance data directly relate to the goals, objectives, and deliverables identified under "Goals, Objectives, and Deliverables." 17 Award recipients will be required to submit performance measure data in BJA's Performance Measurement Tool (PMT) located at https://bjapmt.ojp.gov/help/JAGDocs.html and separately submit a semiannual performance report in JustGrants. Further guidance on the post-award submission process will be provided, if selected for award. Note on Project Evaluations An applicant that proposes to use award funds through this solicitation to conduct project evaluations must follow the guidance under "Note on Project Evaluations" in the OJP Grant Application Resource Guide. Budget and Associated Documentation Budget Worksheet and Budget Narrative (attachment) See the OJP Grant Application Resource Guide for additional information. Please note that the budget narrative should include a full description of all costs, including funds set aside for the NIBRS project(s) and administrative costs (if applicable). Any costs associated with disparate localities should be noted in the "subaward" category of the budget detail worksheet General requirement for federal authorization of any subaward; statutory authorization of subawards under the JAG Program statute. Generally, a recipient of an OJP award may not make subawards ("subgrants") unless the recipient has specific federal authorization to do so. Unless an applicable statute or DOJ regulation specifically authorizes (or requires) particular subawards, a recipient must have authorization from OJP before it may make a subaward. However, JAG subawards that are required or specifically authorized by statute (see 34 U.S.C. § 10152(a) and 34 U.S.C. § 10156) do not require prior approval. This includes subawards made by states and units of local government under the JAG Program. For additional information regarding subawards and authorizations, please refer to the subaward section in the OJP Grant Application Resource Guide. Indirect Cost Rate Agreement Applicants will submit their indirect cost rate agreement by uploading the agreement as an attachment in JustGrants. See the OJP Grant Application Resource Guide for additional information. This rule does not eliminate or alter the JAG-specific restriction in federal law that states charges for administrative costs may not exceed 10 percent of the award amount, regardless of the approved indirect cost rate. Financial Management and System of Internal Controls Questionnaire (including applicant disclosure of high-risk status) Applicants will download the questionnaire in JustGrants and submit by uploading the completed questionnaire as an attachment in JustGrants. See the OJP Grant Application Resource Guide for additional information. 18 Additional Application Components Research and Evaluation Independence and Integrity If an application proposes research (including research and development) and/or evaluation, the applicant must demonstrate research/evaluation independence and integrity, including appropriate safeguards, before it may receive award funds. Applicants will submit a description of their research and evaluation independence and integrity by uploading the document as an attachment in JustGrants. For additional information regarding demonstrating research/evaluation independence and integrity, including appropriate safeguards, see the OJP Grant Application Resource Guide. Certifications and Assurances by the Chief Executive of the Applicant Government A JAG application is not complete, and a unit of local government may not access award funds, unless the chief executive of the applicant unit of local government (e.g., mayor or chairman) properly executes, and the unit of local government submits, the "Certifications and Assurances by the Chief Executive of the Applicant Government" attached in the section above entitled Other Program Requirements. The most up-to-date certification form can be found at: https://bia.oip.gov/program/iag/certifications-assurances. Disclosures and Assurances Applications will complete the following disclosures and assurances. Disclosure of Lobbying Activities Applicants will complete and submit the SF-LLL in Grants.gov. See the OJP Grant Application Resource Guide for additional information. Applicant Disclosure of Duplication in Cost Items Applicants will complete the JustGrants web-based Applicant Disclosure of Duplication in Cost Items form. See the OJP Grant Application Resource Guide for additional information. DOJ Certified Standard Assurance See DOJ Certified Standard Assurance on the OJP Grant Application Resource Guide. DOJ Certifications Regarding Lobbying; Debarment, Suspension, and Other Responsibility Matters; and Drug-Free Workplace Requirements Applicants will review and accept the DOJ Certified Certifications Regarding Lobbying; Debarment, Suspension, and Other Responsibility Matters; and Drug-Free Workplace Requirements. See the OJP Grant Application Resource Guide. Applicant Disclosure and Justification — DOJ High Risk Grantees (if applicable) If applicable, applicants will submit as an attachment in JustGrants. See the OJP Grant Application Resource Guide for additional information. A DOJ High Risk Grantee is a recipient that has received a DOJ High Risk designation based on a documented history of unsatisfactory performance, financial instability, management system or other internal control deficiencies, or noncompliance with award terms and conditions on prior awards, or that is otherwise not responsible. How to Apply Applicants will submit an SF-424 and an SF-LLL in Grants.gov at https://www.grants.qov/web/qrants/reqister.html. 19 Applicants will submit the full application, including attachments, in JustGrants at https://i ustgrants.usdoi.qov/. For additional information, see the "How to Apply" section in the OJP Grant Application Resource Guide and the DOJ Application Submission Checklist. Submission Dates and Time The SF-424 and the SF-LLL will be submitted in Grants.gov by 11:59 p.m. ET on July 26, 2021. OJP urges applicants to submit applications at least 72 hours prior to the application due date to allow time for the applicant to receive validation messages or rejection notifications from Grants.gov and to correct in a timely fashion any problems that may have caused a rejection notification. The full application will be submitted in JustGrants by 11:59 p.m. ET on August 9, 2021. To be considered timely, the full application must be submitted in JustGrants by the JustGrants application deadline. Application Review Information Review Process OJP reviews the application to make sure that the information presented is reasonable, understandable, measurable, achievable, and consistent with the solicitation. See the OJP Grant Application Resource Guide for information on the application review process for this solicitation. Pursuant to the Part 200 Uniform Requirements, before award decisions are made, OJP also reviews information related to the degree of risk posed by the applicant. Among other things to help assess whether an applicant that has one or more prior federal awards has a satisfactory record with respect to performance, integrity, and business ethics, OJP checks whether the applicant is listed in SAM as excluded from receiving a federal award. In addition, if OJP anticipates that an award will exceed $250,000 in federal funds, OJP also must review and consider any information about the applicant that appears in the non-public segment of the integrity and performance system accessible through SAM (currently, the Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System, FAPIIS). Important note on FAPIIS: An applicant, at its option, may review and comment on any information about itself that currently appears in FAPIIS and was entered by a federal awarding agency. OJP will consider any such comments by the applicant, in addition to the other information in FAPIIS, in its assessment of the risk posed by the applicant. Absent explicit statutory authorization or written delegation of authority to the contrary, the Assistant Attorney General will make all final award decisions. Federal Award Administration Information Federal Award Notices See the OJP Grant Application Resource Guide for information on award notifications and instructions. 20 Administrative, National Policy, and Other Legal Requirements If selected for funding, in addition to implementing the funded project consistent with the OJP- approved application, the recipient must comply with all award conditions, and all applicable requirements of federal statutes and regulations (including applicable requirements referred to in the assurances and certifications executed in connection with award acceptance). For additional information on these legal requirements, see the "Administrative, National Policy, and Other Legal Requirements" section in the OJP Grant Application Resource Guide. Information Technology (IT) Security Clauses An application in response to this solicitation may require inclusion of information related to information technology security. See the OJP Grant Application Resource Guide for information on information technology security. General Information about Post-Federal Award Reporting Requirements In addition to the deliverables described in the Program Description, any recipient of an award under this solicitation will be required to submit certain reports and data. Category 1 — Eligible Allocation Amounts of Less than $25.000 Recipients must submit: • Quarterly Federal Financial Reports (and one final Federal Financial Report after all funds have been obligated and expended) through OJP's JustGrants System. • Quarterly Performance Measurement Tool reports and a final Performance Measurement Tool report through BJA's PMT. Please note that as soon as all project activity has concluded, that report may be marked final. • An annual progress report and final progress report through OJP's JustGrants. If all project activity has concluded at the time the first annual progress report is submitted, that report may be marked final. Category 2 — Eligible Allocation Amounts of$25.000 or More Recipients must submit: • Quarterly Federal Financial Reports (and one final Federal Financial Report after all funds have been obligated and expended) through OJP's JustGrants System. • Quarterly Performance Measurement Tool reports and a final Performance Measurement Tool report (at any time once all project activity has concluded) through BJA's PMT. • Semiannual progress reports and a final progress report (at any time once all project activity has concluded) through OJP's JustGrants. Future awards and/or fund drawdowns may be withheld if a recipient of an OJP award fails to report the required reports in a timely manner. Accountability measurement data must be submitted through BJA's Performance Measurement Tool, available at https://bjapmt.ojp.gov. The accountability measures are available at https://bjapmt.ojp.gov/help/jagdocs.html. (Note that if a unit of local government provides funding to a law enforcement agency, the unit of the local government must submit quarterly accountability measurement data on training that officers have received on use of force, racial and ethnic bias, de-escalation of conflict, and constructive engagement with the public.) See the OJP Grant Application Resource Guide for additional information on specific post- award reporting requirements, including performance measures data. 21 Federal Awarding Agency Contact(s) For OJP contact(s), see solicitation cover page. For contact information for Grants.gov and JustGrants, see solicitation cover page. Other Information Freedom of Information and Privacy Act (5 U.S.C. 552 and 5 U.S.C. 552a) See the OJP Grant Application Resource Guide for information on the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act (5 U.S.C. 552 and 5 U.S.C. 552a). Provide Feedback to OJP See the OJP Grant Application Resource Guide for information on how to Provide Feedback to OJP. 22 Application Checklist Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Formula Program: FY 2021 Local Solicitation This application checklist has been created as an aid in developing an application. The DOJ Application Submission Checklist is another resource. What an Applicant Must Do: Prior to Registering in Grants.gov: • Acquire a DUNS Number (see OJP Grant Application Resource Guide) u Acquire or renew registration with SAM (see OJP Grant Application Resource Guide) To Register with Grants.gov: u Acquire AOR and Grants.gov username/password (see OJP Grant Application Resource Guide) u Acquire AOR confirmation from the E-Biz POC (see OJP Grant Application Resource Guide) To Find Funding Opportunity: u Search for the Funding Opportunity on Grants.gov u Access Funding Opportunity and Application Package (see OJP Grant Application Resource Guide) u Sign up for Grants.gov email notifications (optional) (see OJP Grant Application Resource Guide) u Read Important Notice: Applying for Grants in Grants.gov u Read OJP policy and guidance on conference approval, planning, and reporting available at oip.qov/financialquide/DOJ/PostawardRequirements/chapter3.10a.htm (see OJP Grant Application Resource Guide) Overview of Post-Award Legal Requirements: u Review the "Overview of Legal Requirements Generally Applicable to OJP Grants and Cooperative Agreements - FY 2021 Awards" in the OJP Funding Resource Center. Scope Requirement: u The federal amount requested is within the allowable limit(s) of the FY 2021 JAG Allocations listed at: https://bia.oip.gov/program/iaq/fy-2021-allocations. Eligibility Requirement: Only units of local government may apply under this solicitation. By law, for purposes of the JAG Program, the term "units of local government" includes a town, township, village, parish, city, county, borough, or other general-purpose political subdivision of a state; or it may be a federally recognized Indian tribal government that performs law enforcement functions (as determined by the Secretary of the Interior). A unit of local government also may be any law enforcement district or judicial enforcement district established under applicable state law with authority to independently establish a budget and impose taxes; for example, in Louisiana, a unit of local government means a district attorney or parish sheriff. 23 • Submit SF-424 and SF-LLL in Grants.gov After SF-424 and SF-LLL submission in Grants.gov, Receive Grants.gov Email Notifications That: u Submission has been received in Grants.gov u Submission has either been successfully validated or rejected with errors (see OJP Grant Application Resource Guide) If No Grants.gov Receipt, and Validation or Error Notifications are Received: u Contact Grants.gov Customer Support Hotline at 800-518-4726, 606-545-5035, at Grants.gov customer support web page, or email at supportggrants.gov regarding technical difficulties (see OJP Grant Application Resource Guide) Receive email notification to complete application in JustGrants: H Complete Application in JustGrants Content of Application Submission u Information to Complete the Application for Federal Assistance (SF-424) in Grants.gov u Intergovernmental Review u Standard Applicant Information (SF-424 information from Grants.gov) u Proposal Narrative Budget and Associated Documentation u Budget Worksheet and Budget Narrative (attachment) u Indirect Cost Rate Agreement (if applicable) (see OJP Grant Application Resource Guide) u Financial Management and System of Internal Controls Questionnaire (see OJP Grant Application Resource Guide) Additional Application Components u Research and Evaluation Independence and Integrity (see OJP Grant Application Resource Guide) u Certifications and Assurances by Chief Executive Disclosures and Assurances u Disclosure of Lobbying Activities (SF-LLL) (see OJP Grant Application Resource Guide) u Disclosure of Duplication in Cost Items (see OJP Grant Application Resource Guide) u DOJ Certified Standard Assurance (see OJP Grant Application Resource Guide) 24 u DOJ Certifications Regarding Lobbying; Debarment, Suspension, and Other Responsibility Matters; and Drug-Free Workplace Requirements (see OJP Grant Application Resource Guide) u Applicant Disclosure and Justification — DOJ High Risk Grantees (if applicable) (see OJP Grant Application Resource Guide) Submit Application in JustGrants: u Application has been successfully submitted in JustGrants If No JustGrants Application Submission, Validation, or Error Notifications are Received: u Contact JustGrants.Support@usdoi.gov or 833-872-5175 regarding technical difficulties. 25 2021 Washington Local JAG Allocations Listed below are all jurisdictions in the state that are eligible for FY 2021 JAG funding,as determined by the JAG formula. For additional details regarding the JAG formula and award calculation process,with examples,please refer to the JAG Technical report here:https://www.bja.gov/Jag/pdfs/JAG-Technical-Report.pdf and current JAG Frequently Asked Questions here: https://bja.ojp.gov/program/jag/frequently-asked-questions. Finding your jurisdiction: (1) Disparate jurisdictions are listed in shaded groups below,in alphabetic order by county. (2)Direct allocations are listed alphabetically below the shaded,disparate groupings. (3)Counties that have an asterisk(*)under the"Direct Allocation"column did not submit the level of violent crime data to qualify for a direct award from BJA,but are in the disparate grouping indicated by the shaded area.The JAG legislation requires these counties to remain a partner with the local jurisdictions receiving funds and must be a signatory on the required Memorandum of Understanding(MOU).A sample MOU is provided online at:https://www.bja.gov/Funding/JAGMOU.pdf.Disparate jurisdictions do not need to abide by the listed individual allocations,which are provided for information only.Jurisdictions in a funding disparity are responsible for determining individual amounts within the Eligible Joint Allocation and for documenting individual allocations in the MOU. State Jurisdiction Name Government Type Direct Allocation Joint Allocation WA BENTON COUNTY County * WA KENNEWICK CITY Municipal $20,802 WA RICHLAND CITY Municipal $11,068 $31,870 WA CLALLAM COUNTY County * WA PORT ANGELES CITY Municipal $11,501 $11,501 WA CLARK COUNTY County $29,136 WA VANCOUVER CITY Municipal $78,806 $107,942 WA COWLITZ COUNTY County * WA LONGVIEW CITY Municipal $10,934 $10,934 WA FRANKLIN COUNTY County * WA PASCO CITY Municipal $16,635 $16,635 WA GRANT COUNTY County * WA MOSES LAKE CITY Municipal $10,134 $10,134 WA KING COUNTY County $50,637 WA AUBURN CITY Municipal $37,236 WA BELLEVUE CITY Municipal $17,935 WA BURIEN CITY Municipal $20,268 WA DES MOINES CITY Municipal $10,768 WA FEDERAL WAY CITY Municipal $41,070 WA KENT CITY Municipal $47,270 WA RENTON CITY Municipal $33,503 WA SEATAC CITY Municipal $13,801 WA SEATTLE CITY Municipal $483,238 WA TUKWILA CITY Municipal $15,401 $771,127 WA PIERCE COUNTY County $120,776 WA TACOMA CITY Municipal $183,014 $303,790 WA SPOKANE COUNTY County $20,602 WA SPOKANE CITY Municipal $155,779 $176,381 WA WALLA WALLA COUNTY County * WA WALLA WALLA CITY Municipal $12,968 $12,968 WA WHATCOM COUNTY County $14,001 WA BELLINGHAM CITY Municipal $24,735 $38,736 WA YAKIMA COUNTY County $14,568 WA YAKIMA CITY Municipal $48,537 $63,105 WA BREMERTON CITY Municipal $18,035 WA EVERETT CITY Municipal $41,370 WA KITSAP COUNTY County $42,903 WA LACEY CITY Municipal $11,634 WA LAKEWOOD CITY Municipal $42,903 WA LYNNWOOD CITY Municipal $11,868 WA MARYSVILLE CITY Municipal $15,768 WA OLYMPIA CITY Municipal $25,269 WA PUYALLUP CITY Municipal $12,968 WA SNOHOMISH COUNTY County $57,771 WA SPOKANE VALLEY CITY Municipal $29,202 WA THURSTON COUNTY County $26,769 -.- $1,891,583 U.S.Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Bureau of Justice Statistics TECHNICAL REPORT September 2016,NCJ 250157 Justice Assistance Grant Program, 2016 Alexia D.Cooper,Ph.D.,BJS Statistician Introduction HIGHLIGHTS As part of the Consolidated FIGURE 1 Appropriations Act of 2005,the 108th Distribution of fiscal year 2016 JAG awards Congress merged the discretionary Edward Byrne Memorial Grant -$6.7 million Program with the formula-based to U.S.territories and the Local Law Enforcement Block Grant District of Columbia program to establish the Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant(JAG)program.The Bureau of $86.4 million $181.8 million Justice Assistance(BJA)administers to local to state governments the JAG program,and the Bureau of governments Justice Statistics(BJS)calculates the JAG formula-based award amounts using specifications outlined in $274.9 million the legislation. total allocation JAG awards may be used for the following seven purposes- 0 100 200 300 • law enforcement Millions(dollars) • prosecution and courts Note:Detail may not sum to total due to rounding. Source:Bureau of Justice Statistics calculations based on data from the Uniform Crime Reporting • prevention and education program and the U.S.Census Bureau. • corrections and community corrections • The total allocation for the 2016 JAG funding was approximately • drug treatment $274.9 million,of which$268.2 million went to states and$6.7 million to U.S.territories and the District of Columbia. • planning,evaluation,and technology improvement • The five states with the largest total allocations included California ($30.5 million),Texas($21.4 million),Florida($17.8 million),New York • crime victim and witness programs. ($15.6 million),and Illinois($10.4 million). A total of$274,906,565 was available • A total of 1,501 local governments were eligible for awards,either for the 2016 JAG awards(figure 1). directly or through a joint award with other governments within This report describes the steps in the their county.The five local governments eligible to receive the largest JAG award calculation process and awards were New York City($4.3 million),Chicago($2.1 million), presents summary results of the 2016 Houston($1.7 million),Philadelphia($1.7 million),and Los Angeles JAG formula calculations. ($1.4 million). • Two states had 100 or more local governments eligible to receive award funds either directly or through a shared award,California(214)and Florida(118). J Overview of process or U.S.territory's share of violent receives the minimum award plus crime and half of the funds using the amount based on its share of the Once the fiscal year(FY) JAG its share of the nation's population.' violent crime and population. allocation has been determined, The most recent 3-year period of Congress has made one exception BJS begins its four-step award official violent crime data for states to this rule:American Samoa and calculation process: and U.S.territories from the FBI the Northern Mariana Islands are covered the period between 2011 and required to split one minimum award, • Computing an initial allocation for 2013.The population shares for the ° each state and U.S.territory,based 50 states,the District of Columbia,and with American Samoa receiving 67/o on its share of violent crime and U.S.territories were determined based ($460,468)and the Northern Mariana population(weighted equally). on the results of the 2015 midyear Islands receiving 33%($226,798). • Reviewing the initial allocation population estimates published by the (See Methodology.) amount to determine if it is less U.S.Census Bureau. In 2016,four states(North Dakota, South Dakota,Vermont,and than the minimum(de minimus) Examples— Wyoming)and four U.S.territories award amount defined in the • California accounts for 12.89% (American Samoa,Guam,Northern JAG legislation(0.25%of the of the nation's total violent crime Mariana Islands,and the Virgin total).If this is the case,the state and 12.03%of the nation's total or U.S.territory is funded at the Islands)received only the minimum population.Therefore,California's award as their total JAG allocation. minimum level,and the funds initial allocation equals 12.89%of q The remainder of the states,the required for this are deducted from the overallpool of funds.Each of $137,453,283(half of$274,906,565) District of Columbia,and Puerto plus 12.03%of$137,453,283, Rico were all awarded the minimum the remaining states receives the totaling$34255164 minimum award plus an additional , , award plus an additional allocation.A amount based on its share of violent • Wyoming accounts for 0.10%of total of$37,799,653 was allocated for crime and population. the nation's total violent crime minimum awards under the 2016 JAG and 0.18%of the nation's total program,leaving$237.1 million to be • Dividing each state's final amount at allocated based on the states'share of a rate of 60%for state overnments population.Wyoming's initial g allocation is 0.10%of$137,453,283 population and violent crime. and 40%for local governments. plus 0.18%of$137,453,283,totaling Examples— • Determining local award $380,324. ■ Wyoming's initial allocation of allocations,which are based on $380,324 is less than the minimum a jurisdiction's proportion of the Step 2:De minimus awards value,so Wyoming's total state's3-year violent crime average. [Legislative mandate:42 USC 4 JAG allocation will be the minimum If a local jurisdiction's calculated 3755(a)(2)] amount of$687,266. award is less than$10,000,the funds are returned to the state to The JAG legislation requires that each • California's initial allocation of distribute.If the calculated local state or U.S.territory be awarded $34,255,164 exceeds the minimum award is$10,000 or more,then the a minimum allocation equal to value,so California will receive local government is eligible to apply 0.25%of the total JAG allocation the minimum plus an award based for an award. ($687,266 in 2016),regardless of its on its share of total violent crime population or crime average.If a state and population. or U.S.territory's initial allocation To compute the additional amounts, The four-stepaward calculation based on crime and population is the crime and population data for less than the minimum amount, process states and U.S.territories receiving that state or U.S.territory receives only the minimum award are removed the minimum award amount as from thepool,and the remaining 1:Initial allocation to states its total JAG allocation.If a state and U.S.territories or US.territory's initial allocation JAG funds are reallocated to the rest of the states based on violent crime and [Legislative mandate:42 USC 4 exceeds the minimum amount,it population as in Step 1. 3755(a)(1)] 'For purposes of the initial calculations for Using the congressional appropriation the 2016 state and U.S.territory allocations, and formula for the 2016 JAG the FBI legacy definition of rape was used program,BJS calculates the initial for the 2014 violent crime total to maintain consistency within the 3-year violent crime allocation amounts for the 50 states average.See Methodology. and U.S.territories.BJS allocates half of the available funds using a state JUSTICE ASSISTANCE GRANT PROGRAM,2016 I SEPTEMBER 2016 2 Examples— Step 4:Determining local award 10-year limit was applied for the first • Wyoming receives only the allocations time in FY 2012 and has been in effect minimum award,so its crime and [Legislative mandate:42 USC§ for each year since. population data are removed from 3755(c)(d)(e)(f)(g)(h)] After determining which law the pool. To allocate local awards,BJS enforcement agencies have the 3 years • After removing the crime and determines which jurisdictions should of reported violent crime data required population data for the states and be included in the calculation of the to be included in the calculations, U.S.territories receiving only 3-year violent crime averages on BJS computes the average number the minimum award,California which local awards are based.These of violent crimes reported by all accounts for 12.96%of violent crime averages are computed using law enforcement agencies in each crime and 12.15%of the nation's data reported to the FBI's Uniform jurisdiction,such as local government, population.California's new JAG Crime Reporting(UCR)program. for the 3 most recent years in which allocation is equal to$15,360,486 To be eligible,a jurisdiction must they reported data. (12.96%of half of$237.1 million) have provided to the UCR a count of Since awards to local governments plus$14,409,349(12.15%of half of the number of Part I violent crimes are based on their share of all $237.1 million),plus the minimum known to law enforcement each year violent crimes reported by the amount of$687,266.These three for a minimum of 3 years in the past law enforcement agencies in their components equal$30,457,101. 10 years.2 Jurisdictions that have not state,BJS computes the sum of ($237.1 million equals the original met the reporting requirements are these averages within each state to $274.9 million total JAG 2016 award excluded from the calculations and are determine the jurisdiction's share of allocation minus the$37.8 million not eligible to receive an award. the total local award allocation. JAG 2016 minimum allocation.) The 10-year limit on the age of Examples— UCR data used for JAG local award Step 3:60%/40%split to state and calculations was applied for the • California has$12.2 million set local governments first time during the 2009 Recovery aside for local awards.The 3-year [Legislative mandate:42 USC§ Act.'For the 2010 JAG,the 10-year violent crime averages reported 3755(b)] window for eligible UCR data was by local jurisdictions in California waived because some agencies were equal 152,220.67 crimes.Dividing Except for the U.S.territories and the the$12.2 million set-aside by the o having difficulty meeting the new District of Columbia,60%of the total requirements.Instead,all of the FBI's state crime total(152,220.67)results allocation to a state is retained by the UCR data datingback to 1991 were in the number of dollars available state government,and 40%is set aside for each crime($80.03).Therefore, to be allocated to local governments. used to meet the 3-year reporting a local California jurisdiction needs requirement.Agencies that used this a 3-year violent crime average of at Examples— waiver signed an agreement indicating least 124.95 violent crimes($10,000 • California's state government retains they would begin to report timely divided by$80.03)to be eligible for 60%of$30,457,101,or$18,274,260. data on Part I violent crimes to the o a direct award. The remaining 40/o,or$12,182,840, FBI starting no later than the end is set aside for distribution to local of FY 2010(September 30,2010). • Wyoming has$274,907 set aside governments in California. All agencies that used the waiver in for local governments.The sum 2010 reported updated UCR data of 3-year average violent crimes • Wyoming's state government by the required deadline,making it reported is 1138.67.The dollars retains 60%of the minimum unnecessary to authorize any further per crime ratio in Wyoming equals award of$687,266,or$412,359. waivers of the 10-year rule.The $274,907 divided by 1138.67 The remaining 40%,or 274,907,is crimes,or$247.43 per crime(after set aside for distribution to local 2For purposes of the 2016 local award rounding).The threshold is 41.42 governments in Wyoming. calculations,Part I violent crime totals violent crimes($10,000 divided included the definition of rape(legacy or by$247.43)to be eligible for a 2013 revised)that an agency reported to the FBI.See Methodology. direct award. 'Before 2009,all years of the FBI's UCR data could be used to meet the 3-year reporting requirement.Although the 10-year limit was stipulated in the 2005 legislation that created the JAG program,it was not implemented until 2009 per the"Transitional Rule:'See 42 USC§3755(d)(2)(B). JUSTICE ASSISTANCE GRANT PROGRAM,2016 I SEPTEMBER 2016 3 TABLE 1 State and local allocation amounts,fiscal year 2016 Initial allocations Total state State Local Dollars per Eligible local awards Reallocated government Total State government governments crime Threshold Number Amount to state award allocation Total $160,940,804 $107,293,869 - - $1,501 $79,523,714 $20,862,037 $181,802,841 $268,234,673 Alabama 2,727,487 1,818,325 $89.96 $111.16 28 1,069,493 626,248 3,353,735 4,545,812 Alaska 846,506 564,337 160.31 62.38 6 455,275 70,696 917,203 1,410,844 Arizona 3,541,625 2,361,083 87.35 114.48 32 1,922,528 245,959 3,787,584 5,902,708 Arkansas 1,890,836 1,260,557 92.58 108.02 26 804,516 387,322 2,278,159 3,151,394 California 18,274,260 12,182,840 80.03 124.95 214 10,291,887 1,141,661 19,415,922 30,457,101 Colorado 2,571,827 1,714,552 106.83 93.61 27 1,347,132 231,990 2,803,817 4,286,379 Connecticut 1,758,045 1,172,030 130.67 76.53 17 953,437 172,132 1,930,177 2,930,075 Delaware 901,210 600,807 188.16 53.15 10 494,825 46,540 947,750 1,502,017 Florida 10,654,235 7,102,823 77.33 129.32 118 5,795,701 684,953 11,339,188 17,757,058 Georgia 4,892,851 3,261,901 89.63 111.57 60 2,188,767 797,871 5,690,722 8,154,752 Hawaii 937,517 625,011 253.97 39.38 4 577,958 0 937,517 1,562,528 Idaho 979,852 653,234 193.26 51.74 15 404,126 201,899 1,181,751 1,633,086 Illinois 6,260,165 4,173,444 84.07 118.95 42 3,105,966 850,726 7,110,891 10,433,609 Indiana 3,254,115 2,169,410 98.36 101.66 25 1,600,759 404,176 3,658,291 5,423,525 Iowa 1,595,275 1,063,517 131.93 75.80 17 620,502 393,497 1,988,772 2,658,792 Kansas 1,651,202 1,100,801 111.53 89.66 17 687,929 325,682 1,976,884 2,752,003 Kentucky 1,948,730 1,299,153 154.03 64.92 15 890,943 327,934 2,276,664 3,247,883 Louisiana 2,836,034 1,890,689 82.28 121.54 34 1,358,666 402,574 3,238,609 4,726,724 Maine 805,839 537,226 357.44 27.98 13 270,062 239,720 1,045,559 1,343,065 Maryland 3,368,259 2,245,506 86.29 115.88 21 1,936,802 171,435 3,539,694 5,613,765 Massachusetts 3,497,694 2,331,796 89.17 112.15 39 1,701,242 511,413 4,009,106 5,829,489 Michigan 5,196,955 3,464,637 80.75 123.83 52 2,608,255 695,810 5,892,765 8,661,592 Minnesota 2,363,729 1,575,820 124.56 80.28 15 909,443 559,694 2,923,423 3,939,549 Mississippi 1,552,532 1,035,021 159.75 62.60 26 630,073 337,282 1,889,814 2,587,553 Missouri 3,331,900 2,221,267 83.35 119.97 21 1,381,219 713,433 4,045,332 5,553,166 Montana 817,995 545,330 184.82 54.11 15 296,276 196,089 1,014,085 1,363,326 Nebraska 1,126,185 750,790 156.88 63.74 5 543,742 159,079 1,285,264 1,876,975 Nevada 2,065,865 1,377,243 81.65 122.48 9 1,183,308 57,151 2,123,016 3,443,108 New Hampshire 871,073 580,715 235.71 42.42 9 301,744 257,632 1,128,705 1,451,788 New Jersey 3,859,921 2,573,281 106.62 93.79 43 1,813,444 630,250 4,490,171 6,433,202 New Mexico 1,601,499 1,067,666 93.04 107.48 20 783,554 198,920 1,800,420 2,669,166 New York 9,349,451 6,232,967 82.69 120.93 27 5,359,612 505,567 9,855,018 15,582,418 North Carolina 4,609,949 3,073,299 96.14 104.02 54 2,049,823 817,743 5,427,692 7,683,248 North Dakota 412,360 274,907 143.83 69.53 7 164,975 98,379 510,738 687,266 Ohio 4,971,782 3,314,521 102.92 97.16 29 2,414,222 786,071 5,757,853 8,286,303 Oklahoma 2,278,235 1,518,824 89.96 111.16 16 1,053,034 400,091 2,678,326 3,797,059 Oregon 1,859,790 1,239,860 131.93 75.80 18 828,034 334,538 2,194,328 3,099,650 Pennsylvania 5,760,492 3,840,328 98.99 101.02 29 2,588,651 1,121,056 6,881,548 9,600,820 Rhode Island 796,449 530,966 211.91 47.19 10 424,595 69,010 865,460 1,327,416 South Carolina 2,962,180 1,974,787 80.00 125.00 42 1,439,257 448,034 3,410,214 4,936,967 South Dakota 412,360 274,907 103.83 96.31 3 158,378 118,920 531,279 687,266 Tennessee 4,209,060 2,806,040 71.05 140.74 29 1,967,521 705,044 4,914,104 7,015,100 Texas 12,853,519 8,569,013 80.30 124.54 96 6,498,782 1,398,464 14,251,983 21,422,532 Utah 1,445,707 963,805 149.68 66.81 15 653,725 233,004 1,678,711 2,409,512 Vermont 412,360 274,907 487.14 20.53 7 109,956 139,483 551,842 687,266 Virginia 3,213,588 2,142,392 135.31 73.90 35 1,558,265 427,141 3,640,728 5,355,979 Washington 3,191,998 2,127,998 106.19 94.17 39 1,528,027 426,833 3,618,831 5,319,996 West Virginia 1,157,136 771,424 192.81 51.87 25 498,526 206,110 1,363,246 1,928,560 Wisconsin 2,650,810 1,767,207 109.72 91.14 17 1,178,998 445,306 3,096,116 4,418,017 Wyoming 412,360 274,907 241.43 41.42 8 119,759 141,477 553,836 687,266 Note:Detail may not sum to total due to rounding. -Not applicable. Source:Bureau of Justice Statistics,state calculations based on data from the Uniform Crime Reporting(UCR)program,2012-14,and U.S.Census Bureau,2015;and local calculations based on data from the UCR Program,2005-14. BJS then calculates the initial amount reserved for local governments.A total of each local award.Each local award of 1,501 local governments had law Additional JAG provisions amount is equal to the product of a enforcement agencies with a sufficient local jurisdiction's 3-year violent crime number of Part 1 violent crimes that Disparate jurisdictions and joint average and the dollars per crime ratio were reported to the FBI to receive a allocations for the state in which it is located.By JAG award—either directly or through [Legislative mandate:42 USC 4 statute,the minimum award a local a joint award with other governments 3755(d)(3)(4)] jurisdiction may receive is$10,000. within their county.These local Jurisdictions that are eligible for an governments were eligible for a In some cases,as defined by the initial award greater than or equal to collective total of$86.4 million.The legislation,a disparity may exist $10,000 are eligible to apply to receive balance of unawarded local allocations between the funding eligibility the funds for their own use.If the ($20.9 million)was returned to state of a county and its associated initial award is less than$10,000,the governments for redistribution to municipalities.Three different types of award funds are transferred to the state state law enforcement agencies and disparities may exist. administering agency for distribution local governments. The first type is a zero-county to the state police or any units of Two states had 100 or more local disparity.This situation exists when local government that were ineligible governments eligible to receive award one or more municipalities within for a direct award greater than or funds either directly or through a county are eligible for a direct equal to$10,000. (See"Pass through a shared award,California(214) award and the county is not,yet the requirement" [42 USC§3755(c)].) and Florida(118).The five local county is responsible for providing Examples— governments eligible to receive the criminal justice services(such as • The city of Los Angeles,California, largest awards were New York City prosecution and incarceration)for the has a 3-year average of 18,080.67 ($4.3 million),Chicago($2.1 million), municipality.In this case,the county violent crimes,or about 12.0% Houston($1.7 million),Philadelphia is entitled to part of the municipality's of all violent crimes reported by ($1.7 million),and Los Angeles award because it shares the cost of potentially eligible jurisdictions in ($1.4 million). criminal justice operations,although California.Los Angeles exceeds the it may not report crime data to the g In addition,the District of Columbia FBI.This is the most common type state threshold of 124.95 violent was eligible for$1.7 million and crimes and is eligible for 12.0%of of disparity. g Puerto Rico was eligible for$2.9 the$12.2 million set aside for local million(table 2).Guam and the U.S. Example— governments in California,or about Virgin Islands were each eligible for • Lansing City,Michigan,is eligible $1,447,069(18,080.67 multiplied the minimum award of$687,266. for an award of$95,990.Ingham by$80.03). American Samoa($460,468)and the County,Michigan(which includes • The town of Pine Bluffs,Wyoming, Northern Mariana Islands($226,798) the city of Lansing),is not eligible has a 3-year average of 5.67 violent split one minimum award. for a direct award,but it provides crimes.This does not meet the criminal justice services to Lansing. state threshold of 41.42,so it is TABLE 2 In this case,Ingham County and ineligible for a direct JAG award.Its Allocations to U.S.territories and Lansing are considered zero-county crimes,less than 1.0%of all violent the District of Columbia,fiscal disparate.Lansing must share its crimes in Wyoming,account for year 2016 award funds with Ingham County about$1,368 of award funds.These Award amount as mutually agreed upon. funds are transferred to the state Total $6,671,892 for redistribution. American Samoa 460,468 A second type of disparity exists when Guam 687,266 both a county and a municipality Northern Mariana Islands 226,798 within that county qualify for a direct Puerto Rico 2,874,288 award,yet the award amount for the Results of the calculations for the Virgin Islands 687,266 municipality exceeds 150%of the 2016 JAG program District of Columbia 1,735,805 county's award amount. Note:Detail may not sum to total due to rounding. Example— For the 2016 JAG awards, Source:Bureau of Justice Statistics,based on approximately$268.2 million of the data from the Uniform Crime Reporting program, • Pima County,Arizona,is eligible for $274.9 million available was allocated 2012-14,and the U.S.Census Bureau,2015. a direct award of$62,574.The city to the 50 states,with the remainder of Tucson in Pima County is eligible allocated to the District of Columbia for a direct award of$310,484. and U.S.territories(table 1).As Tucson's award amount is more required by the legislation,40%of this than 150%of Pima County's award amount($107.3 million)was initially JUSTICE ASSISTANCE GRANT PROGRAM,2016 I SEPTEMBER 2016 5 amount.Consequently,the two is individually more than 150% state government in the most recently governments'awards are pooled of Alameda County's award,so completed fiscal year to (B)the total together($373,058)and shared as Oakland's award will be pooled expenditure on criminal justice by mutually agreed upon. together with the county's award. the state government and units of The third type of disparity occurs The other nine cities'awards sum local government within the state in when a county and multiple to$216,224.This summed amount such year:' is more than 400%of Alameda municipalities within that county are County's direct award of$50,341. The determination of proportionate all eligible for direct awards,but the As a result,the funds for all 11 criminal justice spending by state sum of the awards for the individual and local governments is referred to municipalities exceeds 400%of the jurisdictions($876,345)are pooled as the variable pass-through(VPT) county's award amount.In the 2016 together and must be shared. process under JAG.The VPT process JAG calculations,this type of disparity • Allegheny County,Pennsylvania, identifies the amounts each state must only occurred with another type of is eligible for an award of$12,044. pass down to local governments within disparity within the same county. The jurisdictions of McKeesport the state. An example of a situation in which ($39,629),Pittsburgh($232,988), During 2014,the U.S.Census this was the only type of disparity Wilkinsburg($15,475),and Penn Bureau finished compiling the most within a county is available in Justice Hills($14,586),are also eligible recent criminal justice expenditure Assistance Grant(JAG)Program,2014, for awards.The award amount for information(from FY 2010)to (NCJ 247137,BJS web,August 2014). Pittsburgh is more than 150%of the award amount for Allegheny calculate updated VPT amounts. These three types of disparity are County.The award amount for Several sources of data were used to examined in order.If a municipality calculate the percentages,including McKeesport is also more than is found to be disparate in one of ° initial expenditure data from the 2010 these three ways,its award is not 150/o of the award amount of the Annual Survey of State and Local county.These two jurisdictions included in calculations to test other are disparate with the county,and Government Finances conducted by disparity situations.For instance, the U.S.Census Bureau(http://www.three jurisdictions will share w if a municipality is found to be census.gov/govs/local/historical_ 150%disparate with the county,its the combined total of$284,661. data_2010.html)and federal justice The remaining jurisdictions of award is set aside,and the rest of the Wilkinsburg and Penn Hills are grant data from the Federal Award municipalities within the same county individuallyless than 150%of Assistance Data System(http://www are checked for 400%disparity.If no census.gov/govs/www/faads.html). other disparity is found,the single the award amount for Allegheny Source data were assigned to state and County,and the two awards municipality and county share the ° local governments.Intergovernmental sum of their two awards.However,it combined are less than 400/o of the expenditures and grants were removed is possible for a county to have both a County's award.Accordingly,they from the total justice expenditure for 150%disparity and a 400%disparity are eligible for direct awards,and the appropriate type of government. simultaneously.For instance,counties the awards for these two cities will The resulting expenditure data can have one or more municipalities remain separate. were then used to calculate the whose individual awards are more For disparate situations,regardless VPT percentages by comparing than 150%of the county's award and of the type,the total of all award the total justice expenditures of all other municipalities whose combined funds for the separate units of local governments in a state to the award is more than 400%of the local governments(counties and expenditures of the state government county's award. municipalities)are pooled together itself.A simple percentage resulted, Examples— and split among the units of local which represented the combined local government as agreed upon by the government expenditures within the • Alameda County,California,is affected jurisdictions.To qualify for state divided by the total state criminal eligible for an award of$50,341. payment,the disparate units of local justice expenditures.These updated The cities of Alameda($12,352), government must submit a joint VPT percentages were used for the Berkeley($39,483),Emeryville application for the aggregated funds. 2016 JAG program and can be found ($11,311),Fremont($23,023), on the BJA website at https://wwwbja. Hayward($48,207),Livermore Pass-through requirement gov/ProgramDetails.aspx?Program_ ($21,529),Newark($10,698), ID=59. Oakland($609,780),San Leandro [Legislative mandate:42 USC 4 3755] ($32,014),and Union($17,607) According to the JAG legislation, (all located in Alameda County) states may only retain award amounts are also all eligible for awards.The that bear the same ratio of"(A)total award for Oakland($609,780) expenditures on criminal justice by the JUSTICE ASSISTANCE GRANT PROGRAM,2016 I SEPTEMBER 2016 6 Sex Offender Registration and result,these jurisdictions received a required for this are deducted from the Notification Act penalty and combined$6,168,218 reduction to overall pool of funds.These states and their FY 2016 Byrne JAG award.These U.S.territories are then removed from compliance bonus funds jurisdictions were allowed to apply to the calculations.Each of the remaining [Legislative mandate:42 USC§ reallocate the 10%penalty to promote states receives the minimum award 16925(a)(c)] SORNA implementation.Six states plus an additional amount based were SORNA noncompliant and did on its share of violent crime and Penalty not apply to reallocate the penalty.Per population for the remaining states the SORNA legislation,the$1,003,487 and U.S.territories. The Sex Offender Registration and withheld from these jurisdictions will For FY 2016,a total of$1,038,782 was Notification Act(SORNA),Title I of be reallocated to jurisdictions that did available from the FY 2015 SORNA the Adam Walsh Child Protection and substantially implement SORNA [(42 reductions from the noncompliant Safety Act of 2006,required that the USC§ 16925(c)].These funds will be states. These funds were distributed 50 states,the District of Columbia, reallocated to compliant states as part to the 20 states and U.S.territories the five principal U.S.territories, of the FY 2017 JAG award. that substantially implemented and some federally recognized tribes substantially implement SORNA by Bonus funds from FY 2015 SORNA during the fiscal year.Of July 27,2009.Two full-year deadline the 20 states eligible for bonus funds, extensions were provided,and a final Per 42 USC§ 16925(c),any Florida($203,389)and Pennsylvania statutory deadline of July 27,2011, state or U.S.territory that has ($113,613)received the largest was established.SORNA mandated a substantially implemented SORNA awards(table 3).Of the eligible 10%reduction in JAG funding for any during the current fiscal year,as U.S.territories,the U.S.Virgin Islands jurisdictions that failed to substantially determined by the Office of Sex received$2,597,Guam received implement SORNA by the deadline.For Offender Sentencing,Monitoring, $2,597,and the Northern Mariana those jurisdictions that failed to meet Apprehending,Registering,and Islands received$857. this deadline,the SORNA penalty was Tracking(SMART),will be eligible For additional information regarding calculated by subtracting 10%from the to receive compliant bonus funds the SORNA penalty and bonus state government's allocation(60%of in addition to its JAG award for the funds,including implementation the total award),after deducting the following year.This bonus allocation mandatory VPT that states are required is calculated using SORNA penalty to send to localgovernments.The funds from nonimplementing states TABLE 3 and U.S.territories during the current Sex Offender Registration and penalty applies to the portion of JAG Notification Act bonus fund fundingthat is returned to the state to fiscal year.For example,any state that substantially implemented SORNA allocations,fiscal year 2016 be shared with local governments that Bonus award amount were not eligible for a directJAG award in FY 2015 would have bonus funds g Total $1,038,781 (less than$10,000 jurisdictions). added to its FY 2016 state JAG Alabama 49,020 award,made up of SORNA penalty Colorado 45,927 The penalty does not apply to the funds from nonimplementing states Delaware 12,548 VPT,which is the portion of JAG and U.S.territories in FY 2015.The Florida 203,389 funds awarded directly to local law amounts available for compliant bonus Guam* 2,597 enforcement,as the state cannot funds will vary from year to year, Kansas 27,700 retain any portion of that award. depending on the amount of SORNA Louisiana 51,724 Penalizing local agencies would also penalty funds from the previous year. Maryland 62,862 seriously undermine the purpose of Michigan 99,109 Bonus funds are allocated using the the statute,since doing so would be Mississippi 25,804 detrimental to local law enforcement same general approach as the overall Missouri 61,384 efforts,including the investigation, JAG award allocation calculations. Nevada 34,416 prosecution,and apprehension of sex First,an initial allocation is calculated Northern Mariana Islands* 857 offenders.An example of how the for each eligible state and U.S.territory Ohio 96,166 SORNA penalty was assessed can be using its share of violent crime and Pennsylvania 113,613 population(weighted equally).Next, South Carolina 54,911 found in BJAs JAG Frequently Asked South Dakota 9,418 Questions(FAQ)on the BJA website this initial allocation is reviewed to determine if it is less than the Tennessee 78,021 at https://www.bja.gov/Funding/ Virgin Islands* 2,597 df. minimum award amount(defined as JAGFA Q P 0.25%of the total funds available). Wyoming 6,719 Note:Detail may not sum to total due to rounding. In FY 2016,a total of 36 states and If this is the case,the state or *U.S.territory. U.S.territories were not compliant U.S.territory is allocated 0.25%of the Source:Bureau of Justice Statistics,based on data with SORNAs requirements.As a total funds available,and the funds from Justice Assistance Grant awards,2015. JUSTICE ASSISTANCE GRANT PROGRAM,2016 I SEPTEMBER 2016 7 requirements and a list of states and For FY 2016,39 states,District of U.S.territories that were affected in Columbia,and 5 U.S.territories were TABLE 4 PrFY 2016,contact the SMART Office not compliant with PREA requirements. fund a Rape Elimination Act bonus allocations,fiscal year 2016 Policy Advisor assigned to assist the As a result,these jurisdictions suffered jurisdiction of interest:http://wwojp. a combined$3,877,473 reduction to Bonus award amount w usdoj.gov/smart/sorna.htm. their FY 2016 Byrne JAG award.These Total $150,562 Alabama 2,548 jurisdictions were allowed to apply to Alaska 784 reallocate the 5%reduction to achieve American Samoa* 252 Prison Rape Elimination Act compliance with PREA standards Arizona 3,312 certification reduction and and become certified.Two states California 17,134 bonus funds and two U.S.territories were PREA Colorado 2,403 noncompliant and did not apply to Connecticut 1,639 [Legislative mandate:42 USC 4 Delaware 835 15607(e)] reallocate the reduction.Per the PREA ( )� legislation,the$150,562 withheld from District of Columbia* 966 Florida 9,984 Reduction these jurisdictions was reallocated to Georgia 4,580 jurisdictions that either were certified or Guam* 869 The Prison Rape Elimination Act were working to achieve certification. Hawaii 909 (PREA)statute dictates that a state Illinois 5,863 whose governor does not certify full Bonus funds Indiana 3,043 compliance with the U.S.Department Iowa 1,486 of Justice(DOD National Standards to PREA bonus funds are allocated using Kansas 1,539 Prevent,Detect and Respond to Prison the same general approach as the overall Kentucky 1,818 Rape,42 U.S.C.15607(e),is subject to JAG award allocation calculations.First, Louisiana 2,650 the loss of 5%of anygrant funds an initial allocation is calculated for each Maine 746 DOJ Maryland 3,149 using that it would otherwise receive for eligible state and U.S.territory, its share of violent crime and population Massachusetts 3,271 prison purposes,unless the governor Michigan 4,865 (weighted equally).Next,the initial submits to the Attorney General an Minnesota 2,208 assurance that such 5%will be used only allocation is reviewed to determine if it Mississippi 1,446 to enable the state to adopt and achieve is less than the minimum award amount Missouri 3,115 full compliance with the National PREA (0.25%of the total funds available).If Montana 757 Standards in future years. this is the case,the state or U.S.territory Nebraska 1,046 is allocated 0.25%of the total funds Nevada 1,927 For those without a certification of full available,and the funds required for this New Hampshire 807 compliance,the PREA reduction was are deducted from the overall pool of New Jersey 3,611 New Mexico 1,492 calculated by subtracting 5%from the funds.These states and US.territories New York 8,761 state government's allocation(60%of are then removed from the calculations. North Carolina 4,315 the total award),after deducting the Each of the remaining states receives North Dakota 376 VPT that states are required to send the minimum award plus an additional Ohio 4,654 to local governments.The reduction amount based on its share of violent Oklahoma 2,127 applies to the portion of JAG funding crime and population for the remaining Oregon 1,735 returned to the state to be shared states and U.S.territories. Pennsylvania 5,394 with local governments that were not Puerto Rico* 1,608 eligible for a direct JAG award(less For the FY 2016 JAG awards,a Rhode Island 737 than$10,000 jurisdictions). total of$150,562 was available South Carolina 2,768 from PREA reductions from the South Dakota 376 The reduction does not apply to the four noncompliant states and U.S. Tennessee 3,938 VPT,which is the portion of JAG territories that did not apply to Texas 12,048 Vermont 376 funds awarded directly to local law reallocate the reduction.These Virgin Islands* 376 enforcement,as the state cannot funds were distributed to the states, Virginia 3,005 retain any portion of that award.An the District of Columbia,and U.S. Washington 2,985 example of how the PREA reduction territories that were PREA certified West Virginia 1,075 was assessed can be found in BJAs or were working to become certified. Wisconsin 2,477 JAG program FAQ regarding the Of the states that were eligible for Wyoming 376 PREA certification requirement and bonus funds,California($17,134) Note:Detail may not sum to total due to rounding. 5%reduction FAQ located on the and Texas($12,048)received the *U.S.territory or the District of Columbia. BJA website at https://www.bja.gov/ largest awards(table 4).Of the eligible Source:Bureau of Justice Statistics,based on data from Justice Assistance Grant awards,2016. Programs/JAG-PREA-FAQ.pdf. U.S.territories,Puerto Rico($1,608) received the largest bonus award. JUSTICE ASSISTANCE GRANT PROGRAM,2016 I SEPTEMBER 2016 8 For additional information regarding The sum of the UCR violent crimes The new definition was approved in the PREA reduction and bonus for all local governments within a 2011,and the FBI encouraged agencies funds,including implementation state for a given year will not equal to begin reporting data using the requirements and a list of states and the estimated crime total published by revised definition starting on January U.S.territories that were affected in FY the FBI for that state.These state-level 1,2013.However,in 2013,some 2016,contact the PREA Management estimates are based on crimes reported agencies reported rape counts using Office at PREACompliance@usdoj.gov by all state,local,and special district only the legacy definition,while other law enforcement agencies within a agencies reported data using only state,plus an imputation adjustment to the revised definition.Accordingly, Maximum allocation to units of account for nonreporting agencies and the FBI chose to report rape counts local government agencies reporting less than 12 months collected under both definitions in [Legislative mandate:42 USC 4 of data.These imputed values do not the Crime in the United States(CIUS) 3755(e)(1)] appear on the electronic data file that publication.The published 2013 and BJS used and are not used to calculate 2014 violent crime totals were created According to the legislation,units the local award. using the revised definition.However, of local government may not receive to be consistent with prior years,the a JAG award that"exceeds such UCR modification to the definition legacy definition of rape was used unit's total expenditures on criminal of rape to calculate the violent crime counts justice services for the most recently in any tables that showed trend data fiscalyear for which data Historically,the UCR program completed defined rape as"the carnal knowledge (multiyear estimates). are available."Award amounts in excess of total expenditures"shall be of a female forcibly and against her For the initial part of the JAG will."Many agencies recognized that calculations,which determines the allocated proportionately among units of local government whose allocations this definition excludes a long list initial allocation to each state and do not exceed their total expenditures of sex offenses that are criminal in how much is available for local awards on such services." most jurisdictions,such as offenses within each state,the formula uses the involving oral or anal penetration, most recent 3 years of crime data as penetration with objects,and rapes published by the FBI.Therefore,to be Methodology of males.Because these sex offenses consistent with the totals published in were excluded,the UCR rape data CIUS,BJS used the FBI's legacy rape The population data used to calculate represented an undercount of rape counts for the first part of the formula. state and U.S.territory Justice known to law enforcement. BJS will begin using the revised Assistance Grant(JAG)allocations rape counts once there are 3 years of are from the 2015 census estimates To be more inclusive and increase accuracy in the scope and volume of Published revised rape counts,which is provided to the Bureau of Justice anticipated to occur in 2017. Statistics(BJS)by the U.S.Census rape,in December 2011,FBI Director Bureau.The state level violent crime Robert S.Mueller III approved For local award allocations,BJS uses data are estimates published by the revisions to the UCR's 80-year-old an electronic data file provided by the FBI's Uniform Crime Reporting(UCR) definition of rape.The new definition FBI.The file includes agency-level program in its annual publication, (referred to as the revised definition) counts of homicide,rape,robbery,and Crime in the United States.The 2016 was broadened to"penetration,no aggravated assault that are summed JAG program used state level crime matter how slight,of the vagina or together to create the violent crime data for the years 2012 through 2014. anus with any body part or object, total used in the formula.Unlike or oral penetration by a sex organ of the estimates published in CIUS, The UCR program also provided another person,without the consent of the electronic file has only a single the crime data used to calculate the victim:'4 category for rape for each agency.This local JAG allocation amounts.BJS category reflects the counts provided obtained data for localjurisdictions 'Frequently asked questions about the revised definition of rape are available at https://www. the agency but does not indicate w in electronic format directly from the fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/recent-program- which definition of rape was reported. FBI and processed the data to link updates/new-rape-definition-frequently- This variable was used in the 2016 JAG each crime-reporting entity to a local asked-questions. calculations for local awards. government.The 2016 JAG used local crime data from 2005 through 2014. For additional information on the UCR program's changes to the definition of rape and how the changes affects CIUS,contact the FBI's UCR program via email at crimestatsinfo@ ic.fbi.gov. JUSTICE ASSISTANCE GRANT PROGRAM,2016 I SEPTEMBER 2016 9 Allocations to U.S.territories Sources of additional information Puerto Rico was the only U.S.territory For more information on the legal to receive an initial allocation larger foundation of the allocation formula, than the minimum amount,and see 42 USC§3754 and 42 USC§3755. it was also the only U.S.territory The Edward Byrne Memorial Justice for which violent crime data were available.The JAG calculations for Assistance Grant Program was the other U.S.territories were based established to streamline justice solely on population data.Because the funding and grant administration. Administered by the Bureau of Justice other U.S.territories have relatively Assistance(BJA),the JAG program small populations(none exceeding allows states,tribes,and local 162,000),it is unlikely the inclusion of crime data would have changed their governments to support a broad range of activities to prevent and minimum status. control crime based on local needs The current JAG legislation specifies and conditions.JAG consolidates that 40%of the total allocation for the previous Byrne Formula and Puerto Rico be set aside for local Local Law Enforcement Block Grant awards.However,as of 2016,the programs.More information about the local-level UCR data provided by JAG program and application process the FBI did not include any crime can be found on the BJA website at data for local jurisdictions in Puerto http://www.bja.gov. Rico.Therefore,the local government JAG program allocation in Puerto Rico was$0. JUSTICE ASSISTANCE GRANT PROGRAM,2016 I SEPTEMBER 2016 10 The Bureau of Justice Statistics of the U.S.Department of Justice is the principal federal agency responsible for measuring crime, criminal victimization,criminal offenders,victims of crime,correlates of crime,and the operation of criminal and civil justice systems at the federal,state,tribal,and local levels.BJS collects,analyzes,and disseminates reliable and valid statistics on crime and justice systems in the United States,supports improvements to state and local criminal justice information systems,and participates with national and international organizations to develop and recommend national standards for justice statistics.Jeri M.Mulrow is acting director. This technical report was prepared by Alexia D.Cooper.Marshay Lentini verified the report. Brigitte Coulton and Jill Thomas edited the report.Tina Dorsey and Barbara Quinn produced the report. September 2016,NCJ 250157 BJS 11111111111111111110111111111101110111 NCJ250157 Office of Justice Programs Innovation• Partnerships•Safer Neighborhoods www.ojp.usdoj.gov CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: July 27, 2021 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ® new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Motion Consideration: Pretrial Services Interlocal Agreement Addendum GOVERNING LEGISLATION: Pretrial Services Agreement 06-016. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Interlocal Agreement for Pretrial Services in the City of Spokane Valley, Contract # 06-016, adopted by Council on February 28, 2006; Admin report July 20, 2019: draft Interlocal Agreement Addendum. BACKGROUND: From time to time the City conducts detailed reviews of the County services provided to the City. In recent years a review was undertaken for Pretrial Services. Part of the interest in conducting this review was due to the length of time since the last review. Additionally, we wanted to ensure that the MacArthur Justice Grant, which included grant- funded Pretrial Officer positions, was properly accounted for within our cost methodology. This project was subsequently delayed on a number of occasions due to the challenge of fully evaluating the impact of adding the City of Spokane as a MacArthur recipient of County pretrial services, as well as scheduling challenges brought on by higher priority projects among both parties. With this review now concluded the key findings are summarized as follows: 1) During the course of the MacArthur Grant period (2017-2020), the City of Spokane Valley did not subsidize the City of Spokane. 2) A new service, Misdemeanor Evaluations, was identified. This service is incorporated in the attached draft Pretrial Services Addendum and is discussed in further detail in the following paragraphs. 3) A County responsibility service, Felony Monitoring, was identified which was previously unaccounted for. This service is incorporated into the existing cost methodology beginning in 2015. The impact of including this service served to reduce the City's final, outstanding 2015-2019 Pretrial settle and adjust obligation by $35,838. The parties have determined that this County-only service can be accommodated within the framework of the existing methodology and does not require formal modification of the Pretrial Services Interlocal Agreement. During the July 20, 2021 Council meeting, Council was presented with a draft Pretrial Service Addendum incorporating a new service—Misdemeanor Evaluations, and there was Council consensus to proceed to a motion consideration. The Spokane County Office of Pretrial Services prepares first appearance evaluations for misdemeanor defendants for the purposes of providing an impartial investigative report for the District Court, prior to a defendant's first appearance, to assist the Court in making a prompt, informed release or detention decision. Washington State Court Rules for Courts of Limited Jurisdictions Court Rule 3.2 addresses various rules pertaining to the release of the accused pending trial. Misdemeanor evaluations assist the Court in its compliance with this rule. The proposed addendum would adopt this new service with an effective date of 2011 which is when we were able to determine this service was added. We initially believed evaluations were part of the indigent screening process, but now believe evaluations are a distinct service that requires authorization by Council. Staff recommends approving this service as it provides the value of potentially reducing jail costs when it is safe to release defendants awaiting trial, and protecting the community and reducing court costs by informing judges when it is not prudent to release defendants. The cost impact is minimal and Pretrial services has worked this service into existing staffing and budget models. This service was requested by the Judges of the District Court. OPTIONS: 1) Move to authorize the City Manager to finalize and execute the Addendum to the Pretrial Services Interlocal Agreement or 2) take other action as appropriate. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION. Move to authorize the City Manager to finalize and execute the Addendum to the Pretrial Services Interlocal Agreement. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: While removing misdemeanor evaluations entirely from the cost calculations would reduce costs an average of $10,999, Pretrial Services has absorbed that service into their existing budget and the City costs have remained fairly constant, increasing less than 2% per year. This amendment would apply to the years beginning in 2011 and moving forward. The years 2011-14 have already been reconciled and all subsequent years had estimated costs booked at year-end that factored in the cost of this new service. There would therefore be no residual impact for past years to the current year's budget. The 2021 budget was also calculated to include the cost of this service. This being the case, the City will not be paying any additional amounts to the County for this service. Each year, the City records a liability or receivable to account for future settle and adjust amounts on contracts with the County. Pretrial services are included in this process. The purpose of this liability or receivable is to record what the City estimates the actual cost to be in the proper year for accounting purposes. When the City settles in a subsequent year on the actual amounts for a contract, the payment for the settlement, either by the City to the County or the County to the City, is recorded against the liability or receivable rather than the expense account, which minimizes any impact to the current year budget. For the settlement of the Pretrial services from 2015 through 2019, the City will be getting money back from the County as our actual costs were less than the estimated costs recorded in each of those years. STAFF/COUNCIL CONTACT: Morgan Koudelka, Senior Administrative Analyst; John Pietro, Administrative Analyst ATTACHMENTS: Pretrial Services Addendum; Exhibit 1 of the Interlocal Agreement for Pretrial Services; RCA Table DRAFT 2021 ADDENDUM TO THE INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN SPOKANE VALLEY AND SPOKANE COUNTY RELATING TO THE PROVISION OF PRETRIAL SERVICES AND OTHER MATTERS RELATED THERETO THIS ADDENDUM, is made and entered into by and between the City of Spokane Valley (hereafter referred to as "City") and Spokane County (hereafter referred to as "County"), hereafter jointly referred to as "the Parties"; and WHEREAS, pursuant to chapter 39.34 RCW (Interlocal Cooperation Act), the Parties have entered into numerous interlocal agreements whereby County is obligated to provide services to City and its residents; and WHEREAS, this Addendum applies to the "Interlocal Agreement for Pretrial Services in the City of Spokane Valley (January 1, 2005-December 31, 2005) executed by the City on March 1, 2006 and the County on March 14, 2006 ("the Agreement"); and WHEREAS, Washington State Court Rules, Criminal Rules for Courts of Limited Jurisdiction 3.2(CrRLJ 3.2)addresses various rules pertaining to the release of the accused pending trial; and WHEREAS,the Spokane County District Court is assisted by the Office of Pretrial Services to ensure the Court's compliance with CrRLJ 3.2; and WHEREAS, the Office of Pretrial Services provides first appearance evaluations for misdemeanor defendants for the purposes of providing an impartial investigative report for the Court,prior to a defendant's first appearance,to assist the Court in making a prompt, informed release or detention decision; and WHEREAS,the Parties desire to amend the Agreement with retroactive application for the period 2011-2014 during which time the City received misdemeanor evaluation services, and encompasses a period that has been reconciled to actual costs; and WHEREAS,the Parties desire to amend the Agreement with retroactive application for the period 2015-2020 during which time the City received misdemeanor evaluation services, and encompasses a period that has not been reconciled to actual costs; and WHEREAS,the City desires to continue to utilize the Office of Pretrial Services to provide misdemeanor first appearance evaluations to Spokane Valley defendants effective beginning in 2021. NOW THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual promises set forth hereinafter,and as provided for in the underlying agreement between the Parties,the Parties do hereby agree as follows: Page 1 of 3 DRAFT SECTION ONE: MISDEMEANOR FIRST APPEARANCE EVALUATIONS SCOPE OF CHANGE - The scope and purpose of this Addendum to the Interlocal Agreement for Pretrial Services in the City of Spokane Valley (January 1, 2005-December 31, 2005) is to incorporate misdemeanor first appearance evaluations (currently provided for misdemeanor DUI and Domestic Violence cases) as a new service within the Agreement. The City's share of this new service will be captured by incorporating misdemeanor evaluations within the existing usage metrics outlined in Exhibit 2. This Addendum applies retroactively to the calendar years 2011-2014, which includes years that have been reconciled to actual costs. The purpose of this retroactive application is to ensure that the services that were reconciled to actual costs are for services officially authorized by the Parties. This Addendum further applies retroactively to the calendar years 2015 - 2020, which includes years that have not been reconciled to actual costs. The purpose of this retroactive application is to recognize that the services were provided to the City during this period. This Addendum is also effective beginning in 2021 and is subject to the automatic annual renewal provisions contained within the Agreement. Exhibit 1 of the Agreement shall be amended by adding the following highlighted language as new paragraphs following the existing provisions: Washington State Court Rules, Criminal Rules for Courts of Limited Jurisdiction 3.2 (CrRLJ 3.2) addresses various rules pertaining to the release of the accused pending trial. COUNTY though the OPTS will prepare first appearance evaluations for misdemeanor defendants for the purposes of providing an impartial investigative report for the Court, prior to a defendant's first appearance, to assist the Spokane County District Court in making a prompt, informed release or detention decision. SECTION TWO: DURATION - This Addendum shall be in full force and effect on the Agreement for the remaining term of the Agreement, or any extension of that Agreement. SECTION THREE: REMAINDER OF INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT TO REMAIN THE SAME - The remaining provisions of the Agreement will remain unchanged by this Addendum. THE PARTIES have caused this Addendum to be executed on the date immediately above their signatures. Page 2 of 3 DRAFT Dated this day of , 2021. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY,WASHINGTON JOSH KERNS, Chair MARY L. KUNEY, Vice-Chair AL FRENCH, Commissioner Attest: CLERK OF THE BOARD Ginna Vasquez Dated this day of , 2021. CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Mark Calhoun, City Manager Approved as to form only: Office of the City Attorney Page 3 of 3 • EXHIBIT �. RCW 10.101.020(1) provides that a determination of indigency shall be made for all persons wishing the appointment of counsel in criminal cases where the right to counsel attaches and that the Court shall determine whether the person is indigent pursuant to the standards set forth in chapter 10.101 RCW. COUNTY through the Office of Pretrial Services("OPTS")will process indigene),applications fir CITY in instances where the charge is for a violation of a state statute punishable as a misdemeanor or gross misdemeanor offense committed by an adult within the jurisdiction of the CITY and/or where the charge is for a violation of a City of Spokane Valley ordinance punishable as a misdemeanor or gross misdemeanor. Pretrial Services shall be provided in the OPTS office, Spokane County Jail, or in the courtroom at the request of a Spokane County District Court Judge. In the event the PARTIES request Services be provided at a location other than those provided for herein, the PARTIES agree to meet and mutually negotiate any and all increased/decreased costs to COUNTY in providing such Services at such additional location(s). CITY further recognizes that a change in working location is a change in `working conditions." COUNTY will need to negotiate changes in working locations with affected bargaining units. Interlocal Agreement, Pretrial Services Page 10 of 12 Table 1: Historical Pretrial Costs vs Cost Impact of Misdemeanor Evaluations %of Public Felony Indirect Safety Monitoring Cost of Misd Year Actual Costs Misd.% SV% Rate Budget Savings Evaluations Net$ _ 2010 $ 91,735 49.3% 32.7% 11.3% 0.4%? NA NA NA 2011 $ 106,362 52.8% 33.7% 13.8% 0.5% NA $ 7,107 $ 7,107 2012 $ 111,480 50.5% 36.5% 15.5% 0.5% NA $ 7,685 $ 7,685 2013 $ 108,314 47.9% 34.1% 19.3% 0.5% NA $ 8,537 $ 8,537 2014 $ 110,357 47.8% 36.1% 11.3% 0.5% NA $ 8,570 $ 8,570 2015 $ 118,618 46.1% 37.8% 15.0% 0.5% $ (6,509) $ 10,193 $ 3,684 2016 $ 113,278 42.3% 35.8% 16.5% 0.5% $ (7,657) $ 10,520 $ 2,863 2017 $ 99,503 37.5% 35.0% 17.4% 0.5% $ (5,649) $ 14,048 $ 8,399 2018 $ 96,804 34.6% 36.2% 15.7% 0.4% $ (7,725) $ 15,275 $ 7,550 2019 $ 108,219 35.6% 36.3% 14.8% 0.4% $ (8,297) $ 17,059 $ 8,762 Total 1111.11111111111111111111111111111.1111 $ (35,837) $ 98,994 $ 63,157 Avg$ Change 1.84% Table 2: Historical Comparison of Actual, Budgeted,and Year-end Booked Costs Year Actual Budgeted Booked 2010 $ 91,735 $ 69,125 2011 $ 106,362 $ 96,111 $ 104,780 2012 $ 111,480 $ 128,393 $ 102,300 2013 $ 108,314 $ 125,838 $ 108,655 2014 $ 110,357 $ 102,894 $ 117,048 2015 $ 118,618 $ 117,738 $ 131,040 2016 $ 113,278 $ 122,372 $ 120,722 2017 $ 99,503 $ 135,432 $ 107,806 2018 $ 96,804 $ 139,892 $ 105,793 2019 $ 108,219 $ 120,352 $ 109,784 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: July 27, 2021 Department Director Approval: El Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ® admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Admin. Report— Spokane Valley Library design update GOVERNING LEGISLATION: n/a PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: • 08/28/2007 Admin Report; Approval for Feasibility Study for Balfour Park • 09/11/2012 Administration Report - Spokane County Library District (SCLD) Interlocal Agreement • 09/25/2012 Passed motion to execute SCLD Interlocal Agreement • 10/29/2013 Passed motion to adopt Balfour Park / Library Conceptual plan • 01/26/2021 Administration Report - SCLD Update by Director Patrick Roewe • 02/02/2021 Administration Report - SCLD Interlocal Agreement Proposed Amendment • 02/09/2021 Passed motion to amend SCLD Interlocal Agreement • 07/06/2021 Passed motion to authorize AHBL Park Design Agreement BACKGROUND: The City entered into an Interlocal Agreement with the SCLD in 2012 shortly after the City purchased 8.4 acres of property from Pring Corporation, in anticipation of SCLD constructing and operating a new central library facility within Spokane Valley. The City sold a total of 2.82 acres to SCLD for construction of a new library, which was anticipated to occur within a five year period. In 2017, the Interlocal Agreement timeframe for completion was extended from 2017 to 2022, with a possible additional extension to October 2024. SCLD submitted a bond proposal to the voters in 2013 and 2014, both of which failed to reach the required 60% approval threshold to pass. Recently, SCLD has identified funding options other than just going for a voted bond. Construction of the new library is anticipated for 2022. On July 6, 2021, Council authorized the City Manager to execute a contract with AHBL, Inc. (AHBL) for design services of the first phase of Balfour Park. With the first phase, the Consultant will advance the park design to 30 percent including all of the architectural park elements which consist of an events plaza, play areas, splash pad and amphitheater. AHBL will also develop park renderings and update the cost estimate for full park construction to be used for grant applications and budgeting purposes. AHBL will also advance the design of site grading, initial parking areas, site lighting, multi-use plaza, and open play areas to 90 percent complete. SCLD's design team started their conceptual design earlier this spring and will provide an update on their progress to Council as this Administrative Report. Additionally, AHBL has also started conceptual design for the future Balfour Park improvements. Staff will introduce the park design consultant and discuss upcoming community engagement efforts. OPTIONS: N/A RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Receive report. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: None at this time. STAFF CONTACT: John Hohman, Deputy City Manager John Bottelli, Parks Director ATTACHMENTS: none Irlr . a I 4` It • •-,t '•,;... 41. . . )„," 411 'I.... L ,� r. . it - = - Spokane ValleyLibrary. 4 vip.. 1 ,,I. 0 II t -., City of Spokane Valley Council Presentation 4101 II _r• • a I. .r ali r1 •_ ;I. A. 1 6- I. ' .--%41 w_ s_ i 47 • gwviii ' f - •• Lp iiii tegrus AA GH7 Tf GiYNE IIIPillrOt' 'kj1r , .. : �,- Iv. ' T. Roadmap 2021 2022 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR PROGRAMMING SCHEMATIC DESIGN DIE4.1.09.DEVELOPMgall . - .,. . . - 1- - . , P-.-"1- --' IT ,,-. i ri 1 - •_. . 1-71 1 • , ' ' ..L ,, . r .r. . . r ilk, r----{ i 1- : • Mg „.7.1_ ,, i. L__I r ,:._,I --,-,,,---•,1-1. , . _ 441 , . . .. . . . , • .. . ,,. . ,. . .• .. 4. .1':---2"-i--,-h • • •P'17 • - 7.,D,,,;-9,:=,, . ' , f ifv ..- ,.. • 6 "'" I I A „, I • . . ..._ , [ ill ....2.. ...„,...input il I • '— •ii-'-'- -- A 0..,„„,, _. _ ..., .4...N.*,... „,.. A - ..._ . L:i. Ilk Tt=''' • 4. , ,_...',., .i.' .. . •- ..- .....-. . ... , 1.r....• ,t vi ..e? Pio pfegrorri naafis f t...,„Z- — .-- 4. SPLICM Elograrn furcti.,.., 5 sldiagmei e't relatonthos 2 Spokane Valley Library Guiding Principles tor ' iiime IlL11- , _., ,..7,-- _ _ Ilk&___ 41 A ,- , , --,__ =_ To provide a multi-use community resource offering .i hk. ' 1 . ,.....,.. public access to knowledge, technology and „ 1 w4' y ____� - collaborative space \ _ 14 4 L lirTo create a welcoming experience and improved , � usability of space for each of the library's user groups J�' - r•_ _q i.14 . r ,etily rJ _�- i i4. ` . b a c�` ,I1 gets: ti z' . - ' - - ill- i 0 k_ g ''''' III To provide a facility that reflects the hard-working, - .L-_- resourceful culture of the Spokane Valley that serves 1 - i - the community for the next fifty years. IT ,•tea 11,1N yumirl.tiii a li! � - ray�.uorr'm #. it / 0 11 i )00/7": Pi * u -.lint ` 1*- i 4141P.tr,e, ,_. .,,. 'flit - --- . _ -PI% P"----- ',4N,Tri:= 4111r. . . - ._1_ *14. --,... ' op, \r"."7 i1/4 e , 1.111. !I MI6 t t4 11 [44 r P P. I T iel AIWIIIIIIk . '#-pia �1 :��- v. -- Site Plan 4 um le al mo nr. ■ If, l.'an to vA u ■n:s . 10 1 t1 ,� - lIII. ll n it P Ly °'' 0 Q Q Q iiiii a 1f _ rr Fri_ _ I I "' -- 1 1 1 1 I tiff ICJ 7 m®Q a a - (� I fi°w \‘‘‘ _ /it/ I I I I q " I. .Ein Q U - 0E0 ►1 1 0 Ell /, 111.1 .. 1I I c I 1 C1 13 C1 13 a"S1r",o I-1 y • PP Floor Plan 5 Aerial View - Looking Southeast _ tr _ I ; 1-1!__., 1 r .7.7,H r r ! - r- •' -.L.-'.. ."--,..,._ I I 4rt '''.. 5--'MINI 1116111.--- M ! -. � N . ,� F <r v-VPV,s Y V 7 k i.5 t - y . ., ,, , ., . .y 1 . ), ... . P = i k ` • j. "f�. . Main Entry Approach vim :r , .. f.. ,. �` ' J ,- w. �.-c - TIC,. '- } . ...OE- ¢ r Y f ill!I ",'.;,r-''' '-,A!--,--''-'''''t.''''-4',..:''-'-s'IP.-• ram. r • ,-.. •- ; _. -• ,-;,•--ir„:; •••• 111 1 I " Syr: r o- 7 View of Teaching Patio r - 'N t - :X. Ar �YT s, i. I ► s ''1 ti. r: 4 _ a i- � - r. L, "7 - yt 14 ai. { sP s ,, ? 4t$irti, IT ri V, I ti 1ipi* rl r l .sue%# ,...,.a Aerial View - from Sprague Ave I-F a f r 1 , 1, , ,,,, ,,,, i, , VL LIBRARY .... _______ ..„.4,....., 1, 1 , mmiftts---__ A. i, ,, 4 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: July 27,2021 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: n information n public hearing n consent ® administrative report n new business n old business AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Update on Spokane Regional Law and Justice Council APPLICABLE LAW: RCW 72.09.300; Spokane County Resolution No. 21-0458 and 21-0459. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: On April 6, 2021, Council requested that staff provide an administrative report regarding a proposal by Spokane County Prosecuting Attorney Larry Haskell to change the structure, makeup, and duties of the Spokane Regional Law and Justice Council (SRLJC), as well as to provide background on the SRLJC. On April 27,2021,a presentation was made by City Attorney Cary Driskell and Spokane County Sheriff Ozzie Knezovich. BACKGROUND: A comprehensive background on this issue was provided in the RCA for the April 27, 2021 discussion, a copy of which is attached to this RCA, and Council is encouraged to review that for background. Additionally,Council sent a letter to the Board of County Commissioners(BoCC)on May 4, 2021, summarizing Council's desires with regard to continuing representation on the SRLJC in the future, whether in its current form or through an interlocal agreement. A copy of the letter is attached. The BoCC adopted two resolutions on June 29,2021,which materially changed the structure,makeup,and duties of the SRLJC,copies of which are attached to this RCA. Of note,the following changes were made: • the SRLJC will have 18 members rather than its former 25 members, of which 10 are County officials/employees; • there are currently three standing committees of the SRLJC (Administrative, Racial Equity, and Strategic Planning),which will go to two (Racial Equity and Legislative Policy). Of the two new committees, Racial Equity will have five members, four of which will be chosen by the SRLJC, and the fifth,who will chair the committee, shall be chosen by the BoCC. The Legislative Policy Committee shall meet twice annually or as needed and shall be comprised of one County Commissioner as selected by the BoCC,the Mayor of Spokane, the Mayor of Spokane Valley, a small city elected representative, the Sheriff, and the County Prosecutor. Any recommendation addressing facilities,programming,funding,or legislation may be referred to the Legislative Policy Committee for a recommendation; • the new SRLJC has a revised scope of duties,the first four items of which are taken directly from RCW 72.09.300 relating to interactions between a county and the state prison system. The fifth states that the SRLJC may address issues identified in the Blueprint for Reform from 2013,and the Update to the Blueprint for Reform from 2020. The five stated duties are as follows: 1) maximizing local resources, including personnel and facilities, reducing duplication of services, and sharing resource between local and state government in order to accomplish local efficiencies without diminishing effectiveness; 2) jail management; 3) mechanisms for communication of information about offenders, including the feasibility of shared access to databases; 4) partnerships between the department and local community policing and supervision programs to facilitate supervision of offenders under the respective jurisdictions of each and timely responding to an offender's failure to comply with the terms of supervision;and 5) reviewing the recommendations made by the Spokane Regional Criminal Justice Commission regarding the governance,reform and research of the criminal justice system in Spokane County set forth in"THE BLUEPRINT FOR REFORM(2013)"as well as the "THE BLUEPRINT FOR REFORM—STATUS REPORT(October 2020)"with the goal of addressing the Mission Statement in Section 7. • the Mission Statement for the new SRLJC is different in some respects from the previous Mission Statement,including eliminating reference to creating a racially equitable criminal justice system. Although the new Mission Statement identifies as its mission"to create and sustain a cost-effective criminal justice system" in Section 7,it is stated in Section 8,Powers and Duties,that the Council may only make recommendations,which is what the prior SRLJC was limited to. • (former Mission Statement) The mission of the Spokane Regional Law & Justice Council is to analyze and make recommendations to local jurisdictions on issues related to promoting a racially equitable,cost-effective regional criminal justice system that builds a healthy and safe community by fostering the best possible outcomes for the community, including reducing recidivism and increasing system collaboration; and • (new Mission Statement) The mission of the Council is to create and sustain a cost-effective regional criminal justice system which includes facilities, programming, funding, and legislative matters intended to build a healthy and strong community that fosters the best possible outcomes for the community which are consistent with the law and community objectives of public safety, accountability, just punishment, appropriate treatment and increase public awareness so as to reduce recidivism and increase system collaboration. There has not been any information to date on when the new SRLJC members will be chosen or named,or when the new entity will begin meeting. Staff will request information from Spokane County on their intended timeframe. Similarly, it is not clear how one representative will be chosen from all of the combined municipal entities, or who will chose that representative. The City may want to discuss with Spokane the ability to alternate two-year terms, or some similar arrangement that allows both cities an opportunity to actively participate every couple of years. OPTIONS: Discussion only. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Discussion only. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS:Not applicable. STAFF CONTACT: Cary Driskell,City Attorney. ATTACHMENTS: (1) Spokane County Resolutions No. 21-0458 and 21-0459; (2) April 27, 2021 administrative report RCA; (3)May 4, 2021 letter from Mayor Wick to Board of County Commissioners; and(4) SRLJC July 2021 monthly meeting report by City Attorney Cary Driskell to represented entities. NO. 21 - 0 4 5 8 - BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON IN THE MATTER OF MODIFYING ) SPOKANE COUNTY RESOLUTION ) NOS. 14-0392, 15-0849, 17-0259, 18-0209 ) RESOLUTION and 18-0912 WHICH RE-ESTABLISHED ) THE SPOKANE COUNTY LAW AND ) JUSTICE COUNCIL ) WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the RCW 36.32.120(6), the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County,Washington(sometimes hereinafter referred to as the"Board" or "Board of County Commissioners") has the care of County property and the management of County funds and business; and WHEREAS, pursuant to RCW 72.09.300, every county legislative authority shall by resolution or ordinance establish a local law and justice council; and WHEREAS, pursuant to RCW 72.09.300(1), the county legislative authority shall determine the size and composition of the law and justice council, which shall include certain individuals in identified positions; and WHEREAS, in 2013 the Spokane Regional Criminal Justice Commission, consisting of the Honorable James Murphy (Retired),James McDevitt,and Phillip Wetzel,authored a document entitled"A BLUEPRINT FOR REFORM" which document was structured to allow an overview of the current criminal justice system operations, acknowledgment of work to date, followed by a set of recommendations for governance,reform and research; and WHEREAS, Recommendation 5.1(2) of A BLUEPRINT FOR REFORM provided as follows: Recommendation 5.1(2) Re-establish the Law and Justice Coordinating Committee and supporting workgroups ; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of RCW 36.32.120(6), RCW 72.09.300 and Recommendation 5.1(2) of A BLUEPRINT FOR REFORM, the Board of County Commissioners re-established the Law and Justice Council under Spokane County Resolution No. 14-0392 and further modified the composition/provisions of Resolution No. 14-0392 under Resolution Nos. 15- 0849, 17-0259, 18-0209 and 18-0912; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Resolution No. 19-1347, the Board of County Commissioners reconvened the Spokane Regional Criminal Justice Commission to provide a Page 1 of 7 status report on the recommendations set forth in A BLUEPRINT FOR REFORM; and WHEREAS, consistent with Resolution No. 19-1347, the Spokane Regional Criminal Justice Commission authored a document entitled"THE BLUEPRINT FOR REFORM—STATUS REPORT(October 2020)". The STATUS REPORT document addressed Recommendation 5.1(2) of A BLUEPRINT FOR REFORM as follows: 5.1(2) Re-establish the Law and Justice Coordinating Committee & Supporting Workgroups. The Spokane Regional Law & Justice Council (SRLJC) and its committees were reestablished shortly after the Blueprint's publication. Since then,the Council has clarified that it is strictly an advisory body (consistent with RCW 72.09,300 and SRLJC bylaws) and cannot manage, direct, or implement initiatives. Although we commend the efforts of the SRLJC, the body has struggled to live up to its original charge due to the unwieldy number of participants, internal disagreement over the Council's purpose and authority, and ongoing public scrutiny. As a result, local jurisdictions have established and disbanded a slew of other committees, task forces, and working groups over the past several years in order to manage and move projects forward. In many cases, such committees have been productive, but in other cases, they have thwarted centralized communication, planning, and public transparency. Moving forward, the CJC recommends shifting or replacing the SRLJC with a Criminal Justice Coordinating Committee, as endorsed by the National Institute of Corrections. > Bottom Line: The SRLJC struggled to grow into an agile and effective working group necessary to catalyze change. County Commissioners and other officials should seriously consider replacing the SRLJC with a Criminal Justice Coordinating Committee. and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has considered the recommendation of the Spokane Regional Criminal Justice Commission with respect to replacing the SRLJC with a Criminal Justice Coordinating Committee as endorsed by the National Institute of Corrections. The Board recognizes that if they establishment of a Criminal Justice Coordinating Committee as endorsed by the National Institute of Corrections under a code county, such as Spokane County, such Coordinating Committee would only be able to provide recommendations to elected officials or political subdivisions involved in the criminal justice system. As such, instead of duplicating the efforts of the SRLJC by the creation of a Criminal Justice Coordinating Committee,the Board of County Commissioners believes that it is more appropriate to address the Regional Criminal Justice Commission's recommendation regarding the "unwieldy number of participants" in the SRLJC by reducing membership is the SRLJC thus fostering a stronger approach to addressing the charge of the SRLJC. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington, pursuant to the provisions of: Page 2 of 7 (1) RCW 36.32.120(6), (2) RCW 72.09.300, and (3) "THE BLUEPRINT FOR REFORM — STATUS REPORT (October 2020)"-"5.1(2) Re-establish the Law and Justice Coordinating Committee& Supporting Workgroups" that the Board of County Commissioners does hereby modify Spokane County Resolution No. 14- 0392, as modified by Resolution Nos. 15-0849, 17-0259, 18-0209 and 18-0912 as more particularly set forth in Attachment"A",attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. The provisions of this Resolution shall supersede and replace Spokane County Resolution No. 14-0392 as modified by Resolution Nos. 15-0849, 17-0259, 18-0209 and 18-0912. All Committees and Workgroups established under the superseded and replaced Resolutions shall cease unless reestablished by the Board of County Commissioners upon its own action or the request of the Council as provided for in Section 8 of Attachment "A". BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington, that this Resolution shall be effective as of the date passed and adopted by the Board of County Commissioners. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 2gty of , 2021. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON d CO Wks. , jiE... Oli g tl C; • :� ilr ` JOSH KERNS, Chair 1 IItt%4ivE coin ATTEST: ��..�....4--' MARY L. K1Lebi EY, Vice-Chair VPA/1411t/Ginna Vasquez AL FRE -1, Commissioner Clerk of the Board Page 3 of 7 ATTACHMENT "A" Section 1: ESTABLISHMENT OF SPOKANE COUNTY LAW AND JUSTICE COUNCIL There is created a board,to be known as the Spokane Regional Law and Justice Council hereinafter referred to as the"Council" which shall supersede and repeal all prior measures regarding bodies established pursuant to RCW 72.09.300. The Council shall have the following composition(the 13 italicized members are-required by RCW 72.09.300): a. Spokane County Sheriff b. A representative of Municipal Police Departments to be selected by the Municipal Police Departments; c. Spokane County Prosecutor; d. A representative of Municipal Prosecutors to be selected by the Municipal Prosecutors; e, A representative of the City Legislative Authorities to be selected by the City Legislative Authorities; f A representative of Spokane County Superior Court to be selected by the Spokane County Superior Court; g. A representative of Spokane County Juvenile Court to be selected by the Spokane County Superior Court; h. A representative of Spokane County District Court to be selected by the Spokane County District Court; i. A representative of Municipal Courts to be selected by the Municipal Courts; j. Spokane County Jail Administrator (Detention Services Director); k Spokane County Superior Court Clerk; 1. Spokane County Risk Manager; in, Secretary of Corrections; n. Spokane County Public Defender; o. Spokane County Pre-Trial Services Director; and p. Three (3) at large members in the community, one being a victim advocate, one being an individual impacted by the criminal justice system, and one being the chair of the Racial Equity Committee. All of the at large members shall be selected by the Board of County Commissioners. Any elected member of the Council who is a representative of his/her body shall be rotated every two (2)years from within its membership. Provided, any representative may waive his/her right to be a member of the Council in any rotation without waiving his/her right to be a member of the Council in any future rotation. Page 4 of 7 Any member of the Council may in writing appoint a designee. The appointed designee should be the same individual to insure continuity of representation. All designees shall be speaking representatives on behalf of the member and a voting member on any matter coming before the Council. Section 2: PURPOSE The purpose of the Council is to provide a permanent on-going forum and structure to coordinate and enhance the administration of justice in Spokane County. Section 3: TERMS The terms of the members of the Council who are not designated by a selecting authority,shall run as long as such individual retains the prerequisite elected position. The terms of members of the Council who are designated by a selecting authority shall be rotated as provided for in Section 1 above. The terms of at large members shall be two (2) years. Provided, however, the initial three (3) at large members shall be those individuals selected by the Board of County Commissioners and currently holding Position No 2, Position No. 3, and Position No. 4 on the Spokane Regional Law and Justice Council prior to the effective date of this document. These three (3) individuals shall hold their positions until their terms under the Spokane Regional Law and Justice Council prior to the effective date of this document would have expired, namely Position No. 2(September 26, 2024), Position No, 3 (October 3, 2021) and Position No. 4 (October 3, 2022). Members may be removed by their selecting authority. Except in the case of removal,each member shall continue to serve until a successor has been appointed. Section 4: COMPENSATION Members of the Council shall serve without compensation and/or per diem of any kind or nature whatsoever, including compensation for travel to and from the usual places of business to the place of a regular or special meeting of the Council. Section 5: MEETINGS, RULES AND REGULATIONS The Council shall hold meetings as deemed necessary by the Chairperson or a majority of the Council. Provided, however, the Council shall meet at a minimum twice annually_ The Council may adopt rules and regulations governing the transaction of business. The Council shall keep public records of all actions as may be required by applicable laws. All meetings of the Council shall be open and accessible to the public as provided by law. A quorum for doing business by the Council shall be established by the presence of at least 50% of the members or their authorized designees either in person or telephonically. Section 6: OFFICERS The chairperson of the Council shall be selected by the Council on an annual basis in January by a simple majority vote of a quorum of voting members. Page 5 of 7 The vice chairperson of the Council shall be selected by the Council on an annual basis in January by a simple majority vote of a quorum of the voting members. The chairperson shall preside over all meetings, and in the absence of such chairperson, the vice- chairperson shall preside. Section 7: MISSION STATEMENT The mission of the Council is to create and sustain a cost-effective regional criminal justice system which includes facilities, programing, funding, and legislative matters intended to build a healthy and strong community that fosters the best possible outcomes for the community which are consistent with the law and community objectives of public safety,accountability,just punishment, appropriate treatment and increase public awareness so as to reduce recidivism and increase system collaboration. Section 8: POWERS AND DUTIES The Council, in conjunction with carrying out the above mission statement, may make recommendations to the appropriate elected officials of Spokane County and the legislative bodies/elected officials of cites/towns located in Spokane County on the_issues identified below. Provided, in carrying out the mission statement set forth in Section 7, any recommendation addressing facilities, programing, funding, or legislation may be referred by the Board of County Commissioners to a Committee to be known as the Legislative Policy Committee. The Legislative Policy Committee shall meet twice annually or as needed and shall consist of the following individuals: one County Commissioner to be selected by the Board of County Commissioners, the Mayor of the City of Spokane, the Mayor of the City of Spokane Valley, an elected representative of"small cities", the Sheriff, and the County Prosecutor. The terminology "small cities" shall mean all cities and towns within Spokane County other than the City of Spokane and City of Spokane Valley. The Legislative Policy Committee shall make recommendations to the Board of County Commissioners on facilities, programing,joint funding or legislative matters considered by the Council. The issues which are the subject of this Section are: (a) Maximizing local resources including personnel and facilities, reducing duplication of services, and sharing resources between local and state government in order to accomplish local efficiencies without diminishing effectiveness; (b) Jail management; (c) Mechanisms for communication of information about offenders, including the feasibility of shared access to databases; (d) Partnerships between the department and local community policing and supervision programs to facilitate supervision of offenders under the respective jurisdictions of each and timely responding to an offender's failure to comply with the terms of supervision;and Page 6 of 7 (e) Reviewing the recommendations made by Spokane Regional Criminal Justice Commission regarding the governance, reform and research of the criminal justice system in Spokane County set forth in "THE BLUEPRINT FOR REFORM (2013)" as well as the "THE BLUEPRINT FOR REFORM-STATUS REPORT (October 2020)" with the goal of addressing the Mission Statement in Section 7. The Board of County Commissioners on request of the Council,or on its own action may establish permanent or temporary advisory committees to assist the Council in carrying out its powers and duties as outlined above, The Board of County Commissioners shall establish a permanent advisory committee to be known as the Racial Equity Committee. The Racial Equity Committee shall consist of five (5) members, Four(4)members shall be selected by the Council. The fifth member,who shall be the chair, shall be selected by the Board of County Commissioners. The Council has no authority to appropriate/expend any moneys or execute any agreements. Section 9: STAFF SUPPORT Spokane County shall provide staff support for the Council as is deemed necessary. Page 7 of 7 N©.2 1 '"` 0 4 5 9 - BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON IN THE MATTER OF ESTABLISHING ) THE RACIAL EQUITY PERMANENT ) COMMITTEE TO ASSIST THE ) RESOLUTION SPOKANE REGIONAL LAW AND ) JUSTICE COUNCIL IN CARRYING OUT ) ITS POWERS AND DUTIES ) WHEREAS, pursuant to the Constitution and laws of the State of Washington, Spokane County, Washington is a class A county duly organized and existing; and WHEREAS,pursuant to the provisions of RCW 36.01.030,the powers of Spokane County can only be exercised through the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington("Board" or"Board of County Commissioners"); and WHEREAS, pursuant to RCW 72.09.300, every county legislative authority shall by resolution or ordinance establish a local law and justice council; and WHEREAS, pursuant to RCW 72.09.300(1), the county legislative authority shall determine the size and composition of the law and justice council, which shall include certain individuals in identified positions; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of RCW 72.09.300, the Board of County Commissioners under Resolution No. 21-0458 created a local law and justice council to be known as the Spokane Regional Law and Justice Council; and WHEREAS, Section 8 of Attachment "A" to Resolution No. 21-0458 provides in part as follows: The Board of County Commissioners on request of the Council,or on its own action may establish permanent or temporary advisory committees to assist the Council in carrying out its powers and duties as outlined above. ; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Section 8 of Attachment "A" to Resolution No. 21-045 8, the Board of County Commissioners desires to establish a permanent advisory committee to be known as the"Racial Equity Committee". NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington,pursuant to the provisions of RCW 36.01.030,RCW 72.09.300 and Section 8 of Attachment"A"to Resolution No. 21-0458,that the Board: Page 1 of 2 (I) Establishes a permanent advisory committee to be known as the "Racial Equity Committee". (2) The Racial Equity Committee shall develop a clear and complete action plan to address the disproportionate impact on people of color within our regional criminal justice system as a matter of fairness and integrity to be presented to the Spokane Regional Law and Justice Council. (3) The Racial Equity Committee shall have five (5) members. Four members shall be appointed by the Spokane Regional Law and Justice Council. The fifth member, who shall he the chair,shall be appointed by the Board ofCounty Commissioners. Members of the Racial Equity Committee serve terms of two (2) years. Members of the Racial Equity Committee shall represent stakeholders, experts and community members having a diversity of ethnicity and diversity of opinion on the mission of the Spokane Regional Law and Justice Council, namely: Section No. 7: MISSION STATEMENT The mission of the Committee is to create and sustain a cost-effective regional criminal justice system that builds a healthy and strong community by fostering the best possible outcomes for the community which are consistent with the law and community objectives of public safety, accountability,just punishment, appropriate treatment and increase public awareness so as to reduce recidivism and increase system collaboration. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 2-ei ay of S 1J , 2021. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS oFQMM�sl��4 OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON 1. • exit Lc*.Lek 110. 1 . +.al: ' JOSH KERNS, Chair % t E ATTEST: MARY L. KU)fit.-4441, 444tly— •r8c0%.) Y, Vice-Chair inna Vasquez, Clerk of the card ALL FRENC]-I, Commissioner Page 2of2 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: April 27,2021 Department Director Approval: 14 Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑new business ❑public hearing ❑ information ® admin. report ❑pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Spokane Regional Law and Justice Council administrative report. GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 72.09.300; Spokane County Resolution No. 18-0912. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: On April 6, 2021, Council requested that staff provide an administrative report regarding a recent proposal to change the structure,makeup,and duties of the Spokane Regional Law and Justice Council(SRLJC),as well as to provide background on the SRLJC. City Manager Calhoun identified that the City Attorney's office could provide an update. A request was then made by a Councilmember to have someone from Spokane County provide information as well as to why a proposed County resolution from Spokane County Prosecutor Larry Haskell (attached)should be adopted. Spokane County Sheriff Ozzie Knezovich will provide that information. BACKGROUND: The SRLJC in its current form was started in 2014 at the recommendation of the Spokane County Criminal Justice Council (CJC), a three-person group of system professionals tasked with assessing the regional criminal justice system in order to make recommendations for improving the system. These initial recommendations were contained in the CJC's Blueprint for Reform in December 2013. A law and justice council is required by RCW 72.09.300 and has various identified responsibilities and tasks,with its minimum membership (13 mandatory members) set forth in statute. A general summary of those responsibilities as a committee is for it to act as a conduit of information for the interaction between the local jail and the state prison system. This is intended to facilitate a smooth transition of inmates between facilities for the two entities. Spokane County previously had a law and justice council, but it was discontinued at some point in the past. The language of RCW 72.09.300 uses the word "may" in identifying tasks and duties, which has been interpreted to mean a county could expand those during local implementation. The Spokane County Board of Commissioners took this approach in 2014, expanding the scope of duties, as well as adding to the statutory minimum number of committee members when it passed its enabling Resolution. In 2020,the CJC did an update on the Blueprint for Reform as a form of report card on the progress of the SRLJC relative to the CJC's original Blueprint for Reform. That update stated that while the SRLJC achieved a number of successes,the recent past several years have been less productive. Further,the CJC noted concern that the number of participants in the SRLJC was likely hurting its ability to be very functional, becoming a committee of more talk and less action. They also noted as concerns, internal disagreements over purpose and authority, as well as ongoing public scrutiny. In short,the SRLJC was not meeting the expectations of many people. The CJC recommended creating in some fashion a new entity consistent with recommendations from the National Institute of Corrections,which advises doing so through a negotiated interlocal agreement between the various parties. Prosecutor Haskell proposed a County Resolution to revise the SRLJC and released it for public discussion. Under this proposal, the new or revised committee would be created by the County Commissioners, and would be reduced in size to conform to the membership identified in RCW 72.09.300 (13 members, rather than the current 25 member body). The new committee's responsibilities would also align much more closely with the statute. The SRLJC, the County Commissioners, and many elected officials have received public comments about this proposal over the past month. The City of Spokane sent a letter (attached) signed by Mayor Woodward, Council President Breean Beggs, City Attorney Mike Ormsby, and City Prosecutor Justin Bingham in which the City identified concerns with Prosecutor Haskell's proposal, particularly the anticipated negative affect it would have on community input, and urging the BoCC to not adopt Prosecutor Haskell's proposed Resolution. Spokane Valley does not have a designated seat on the SRLJC, but is represented by Police Chief Dave Ellis, who serves as a representative of municipal police chiefs with the exception of Spokane, which has Chief Meidl holding a designated seat as Spokane's Police Chief. Additionally,City Attorney Cary Driskell acts as the representative of all municipal legislative bodies minus Spokane, which has its own legislative representative. Spokane also has a designated seat for its Mayor. Under the proposed Resolution, Spokane would share just one position with all other municipal entities in the County,currently held by City Attorney Driskell, which could be reassigned to Spokane so they would have a representative. Spokane Valley may have one other representative if Chief Ellis continues to fill his seat. At its April 2021 meeting,the SRLJC voted to send to its Strategic Planning Committee a task to analyze Prosecutor Haskell's proposed Resolution, and further try to identify whether there are other committee options for doing the work that the SRLJC has performed over the past seven years,but which could address some of the issues that have been experienced and identified by the CJC as limiting the success of the collective efforts. The CJC's Update to the Blueprint for Reform focused on the potential creation of a new committee modeled after a Criminal Justice Coordinating Committee, as recommended by the National Institute of Corrections. This would be formed by interlocal agreement, rather than a Resolution from the County Commissioner, and would feature members who were agreed upon and who wanted to attend, rather than including members mandated by statute. The Strategic Planning Committee is currently in the process of having several special meetings in order to provide a recommendation of options to the SRLJC. The SRLJC will then likely make a recommendation to the governing bodies for the regional entities at the May meeting. It is important to understand that this discussion and decision on the committee and structure is very likely not an "either/or" proposition. It seems clear that some form of committee as envisioned by Prosecutor Haskell must be maintained, as it is required by state statute. What is not clear at this point is whether that will be the only committee, with more limited functions and size, or whether there will be a second committee by interlocal agreement to address more of the systemic deficiencies identified by the CJC, the public, affected communities in the region, and others. Lastly, the Strategic Planning Committee may identify other potential options for consideration and recommendation. Presumably,this issue may come to Council for a discussion and decision on whether to take part in a new committee pursuant to an interlocal agreement, and what those terms may look like. It is not clear at this point what the timeframe would be if this occurs. OPTIONS: Discussion RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Discussion BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Unknown. STAFF CONTACT: Cary Driskell, City Attorney. ATTACHMENTS: (1) CJC Update to the Blueprint for Reform; (2) Prosecutor Haskell's proposed Resolution; and (3) April 13, 2021 letter from City of Spokane to BoCC regarding Prosecutor Haskell's proposed Resolution. *mane .00Valley 10210 East Sprague Avenue ♦ Spokane Valley WA 99206 509.720.5000 ♦ Fax: 509.720.5075 ♦ cityhall®spokanevalley.org May 4, 2021 Spokane County Board of Commissioners 1116 West Broadway Spokane, WA 99260 Re: Re-structure of Spokane Regional Law and Justice Council Dear Board of Commissioners: I write this letter on behalf of the Spokane Valley City Council with regard to the recent discussions about the structure, function, and representational makeup of the Spokane Regional Law and Justice Council (SRLJC). We have read the proposed Spokane County Resolution from County Prosecutor Haskell. We understand the goal of that is to revise the nature and scope of authority of the existing SRLJC to comply with RCW 72.09.300 in furtherance of more efficient jail operations,and to facilitate better communication and cooperation with the Washington state prisons system. This would represent a significant step away from the duties and makeup of what the SRLJC has engaged in since 2014, as set forth by the various enabling resolutions by the Board of Commissioners. Our concern with that approach is that it is likely to result in the elimination of the only existing forum where the various regional partners, criminal justice system professionals, and very importantly, the public can regularly meet to discuss a wide range of issues regarding the regional criminal justice system. It is unquestioned that our system is very expensive, a cost primarily borne by the residents of this County. We also understand that objective data shows that people of color have been and are disproportionately impacted by the system, with significantly higher percentages being arrested and jailed. We also support the exploration of safe and cost effective alternatives to incarceration as ways to reduce incarcerating people in the jail. For these and other reasons,the SRLJC has performed an important function over the years that we don't want to lose. Given our interest in these issues, the Spokane Valley City Council supports having a second committee to act as a regional venue where these issues will continue to be discussed, and hopefully acted upon, which may be in the form of an interlocal agreement where the jurisdictions can mutually negotiate the scope, duties, membership, and representation. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Li„, Ben Wick,Mayor c: Spokane Valley City Council OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY Solane CARP P. DRISKELL-CITY ATTORNEY \it11ciT 10210 East Sprague Avenue ♦ Spokane Valley,WA 99206 509.720.5105 • Fax:509.720.5095 ♦ cityattomey@spokanevalley.org spokanevalley.org July 14,2021 http://www.spokanecoun .or 872/Spokane-Regional-Law-Justice-Council To: Represented communities in Spokane County From: Cary Driskell, Spokane Valley City Attorney, acting in representative capacity for municipal legislative entities (except Spokane) on Spokane Regional Law&Justice Council. Re: Monthly SRLJC meeting on July 14, 2021. I. Welcome/introductions. The meeting was held by Zoom. 2.Approval of Minutes. There was no approval of the June, 2021 minutes because the SRLJC was effectively disbanded as discussed further below. 3. Discussion of Spokane County Resolution 21-0458 and 0459. On June 29, 2021, the BoCC adopted Resolutions 21-0458 and 21-0459,which immediately ended the existing SRLJC structure, replacing it with a revised structure, with changed duties and obligations. Copies of the both Resolutions are attached. A new SRLJC was put into place, however the new structure will not be operational for at least several months as the BoCC seeks to flesh out the new membership roster, and to adopt new Bylaws for operation of the Council. Copies of both Resolutions are attached for your reference. There will be additional information coming forward in the coming months from Spokane County on when the new Council will begin, and how they will proceed. This is very likely my last meeting, and thus my final report. I have appreciated the opportunity to represent the legislative bodies of all the other municipalities in the County, except Spokane. 4.Adjourn. *As previously noted,you can sign up for the SRLJC News Flash by clicking on the following link http://www.spokanecounty.org/list.aspx and scrolling down to locate the Spokane Regional Law and Justice News under"News Flash"to sign up for notifications and updates. You can also see"Latest News" at: www.spokanecounty.org/srljc Page 1 of 1 DRAFT ADVANCE AGENDA as of July 21,2021; 4:30 p.m. Please note this is a work in progress; items are tentative To: Council& Staff From: City Clerk,by direction of City Manager Re: Draft Schedule for Upcoming Council Meetings August 3,2021,Study Session,6:00 p.m.—Meeting cancelled:National Night Out Aug 10,2021,Formal Meeting,6:00 p.m. [due Tue Aug 3] 1. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 2. Second Reading Ordinance 21-010,Batch Text Amendments—Marty Palaniuk (10 minutes) 3.Motion Consideration: Council Goals&Priorities for Use of Lodging Tax—Chelsie Taylor (10 minutes) 4.Admin Report: Spokane County Stabilization Center Briefing—Cary Driskell (20 minutes) 5.Admin Report: ARPA(American Rescue Plan Act)Update—Bill Helbig,Chelsie Taylor,Erik Lamb (15 min) 6.Admin Report: Advance Agenda—Mayor Wick (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting: 65 mins] Aug 17,2021, Study Session,6:00 p.m. [due Tue Aug 10] 1. Council 2022 Budget Goals—Mark Calhoun (15 minutes) 2. Complete Streets—Adam Jackson (15 minutes) 3.Balfour Park Administrative Design Update—John Hohman,John Bottelli,et al (10 minutes) 4. State Legislative Impacts on Law Enforcement—Chief Ellis (15 minutes) 5.Advance Agenda—Mayor Wick (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting: 60 mins] Aug 24,2021,Formal Meeting,6:00 p.m. [due Tue Aug 17] 1. PUBLIC HEARING: Interim Development Regulations—Erik Lamb (20 minutes) 2. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 3.Admin Report: 2022 Budget-Estimated Revenues&Expenditures—Chelsie Taylor (10 minutes) 4.Admin Report: Potential&Pending Projects—Chelsie Taylor (15 minutes) 5.Admin Report: Advance Agenda—Mayor Wick (5 minutes) 6. Info Only: Department Monthly Reports [*estimated meeting: 55 mins] Aug 31,2021, Study Session,6:00 p.m. [due Tue Aug 24] 1.Advance Agenda—Mayor Wick (5 minutes) Sept 7,2021, Study Session,6:00 p.m. [due Tue Aug 31] Proclamation:Alcohol&Drug Recovery Month 1.Advance Agenda—Mayor Wick (5 minutes) Sept 14,2021,Formal Meeting,6:00 p.m. [due Tue Sept 7] Proclamation: Constitution Week-Sept 17-23 1. PUBLIC HEARING#1: 2022 Budget Revenues,Property Taxes—Chelsie Taylor (10 minutes) 2. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 3.Motion Consideration: Set Budget Hearing for October 12,2021 —Chelsie Taylor (5 minutes) 4.Advance Agenda—Mayor Wick (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting: 25 mins] Sept 21,2021,Study Session,6:00 p.m. [due Tue Sept 14] 1. Proposed draft ordinance adopting 2022 property taxes—Chelsie Taylor (10 minutes) 2. Outside Agencies Presentations—Chelsie Taylor (-60 minutes) 3.Advance Agenda—Mayor Wick (5 minutes [*estimated meeting: 75 mins] Draft Advance Agenda 7/22/2021 2:16:47 PM Page 1 of 2 Sept 28,2021,Formal Meeting,6:00 p.m. [due Tue Sept 21] 1. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 2.Admin Report: Advance Agenda—Mayor Wick (5 minutes) 3. Info Only: Department Monthly Reports Oct 5,2021, Study Session,6:00 p.m. [due Tue Sept 28] 1. City Manager Presentation of 2022 Preliminary Budget—Mark Calhoun (30 minutes) 2.Advance Agenda—Mayor Wick (5 minutes) Oct 12,2021,Formal Meeting,6:00 p.m. [due Tue Oct 5] 1. PUBLIC HEARING#2: 2022 Budget—Chelsie Taylor (15 minutes) 2. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 3.First Reading Ordinance 21- Property Tax-Chelsie Taylor (10 minutes) 4.Admin Report: 2021 Budget Amendment—Chelsie Taylor (10 minutes) 5.Advance Agenda—Mayor Wick (5 minutes) Oct 19,2021, Study Session,6:00 p.m. [due Tue Oct 12] 1.Advance Agenda—Mayor Wick (5 minutes) Oct 26,2021,Formal Meeting,6:00 p.m. [due Tue Oct 19] 1. PUBLIC HEARING: 2021 Budget Amendment—Chelsie Taylor (15 minutes) 2.First Reading Ordinance 21- ,Amending 2021 Budget—Chelsie Taylor (10 minutes) 3. Second Reading Ordinance 21, ,Property Tax—Chelsie Taylor (10 minutes) 4.First Reading Ordinance 21- Adopting 2022 Budget—Chelsie Taylor (10 minutes) 5. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 6.Motion Consideration: Outside Agency Grant Awards-Chelsie Taylor (10 minutes) 7.Advance Agenda—Mayor Wick (5 minutes) 8. Info Only: Department Monthly Reports [*estimated meeting: 65 mins] Nov 2,2021, Study Session,6:00 p.m. (general election) Nov 9,2021,Formal Meeting,6:00 p.m. [due Tue Nov 2] 1. PUBLIC HEARING#3: 2022 Budget—Chelsie Taylor (15 minutes) 2. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 3. Second Reading Ordinance 21- ,Amending 2021 Budget—Chelsie Taylor (10 minutes) 4. Second Reading Ordinance 21, ,Adopting 2022 Budget—Chelsie Taylor (10 minutes) 5.Admin Report: LTAC Recommendations to Council—Chelsie Taylor—Chelsie Taylor (15 minutes) 6.Admin Report: Advance Agenda—Mayor Wick (5 minutes) Nov 16,2021,Study Session,6:00 p.m. [due Tue Nov 9]] 1.Advance Agenda—Mayor Wick (5 minutes) Nov 23,2021,Formal Meeting,6:00 p.m. [due Tue Nov 16] 1.Admin Report: 2022 Fee Resolution—Chelsie Taylor (5 minutes) 2.Advance Agenda—Mayor Wick (5 minutes) 3. Info Only: Department Monthly Reports *time for public or Council comments not included OTHER PENDING AND/OR UPCOMING ISSUES/MEETINGS: Appleway Trail Amenities Park Lighting SVPD Precinct Needs Assessment Artwork&Metal Boxes PFD Presentation SVPD Vehicle Replacement Consolidated Homeless Grant Prosecutor Services TPA Core Beliefs Resolution Residency Vehicle Wgt Infrastructure Impact HHAA Funds Ridgemont Area Traffic Water Districts&Green Space Mirabeau Park Forestry Mgmt. SCRAPS Service Update Way Finding Signs Neighborhood Restoration St.Illumination(owners,cost,location) No Parking Zones St.O&M Pavement Preservation Draft Advance Agenda 7/22/2021 2:16:47 PM Page 2 of 2 City of Spokane Valley Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 01/01/2021 - 06/30/2021 Page Title 1 Cover Sheet 2 Pre-Application Meetings Requested 3 Online Applications Received 4 Construction Applications Received 5 Land Use Applications Received 6 Construction Permits Issued 7 Land Use Applications Approved 8 Development Inspections Performed 9 Code Enforcement 10 Revenue 11 Building Permit Valuations Printed 07/06/2021 16:15 Page 1 of 11 Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 01/01/2021 - 06/30/2021 Pre-Application Meetings Requested A Pre-Application Meeting is a service provided to help our customers identify the code requirements related to their project proposal. Community& Public Works Department scheduled a total of 10 Pre-Application Meetings in June 2021. 15 11 10 5 1 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Land Use Pre-Application 1 Commercial Pre-App Meeting Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Commercial Pre-App 2 1 0 3 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 Land Use Pre-Application Meeting 6 7 7 5 5 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 Monthly Totals 8 8 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 Annual Total To-Date: 46 Printed 07/06/2021 16:15 Page 2 of 11 Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 01/01/2021 - 06/30/2021 Online Applications Received Community& Public Works Department received a total of 495 Online Applications in June 2021. c 600 400-- 200 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec • Trade Permit Right of Way Permit Pre-Application Meeting Request Demolition Permit M Sign Permit Reroof Permit = Other Online Applications = Approach Permit Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Approach Permit 7 3 14 24 21 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 Demolition Permit 8 8 6 10 6 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other Online Applications 201 94 160 122 122 90 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pre-Application Meeting Request 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reroof Permit 29 44 109 126 80 63 0 0 0 0 0 0 Right of Way Permit 19 22 47 57 42 53 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Permit 9 9 14 11 17 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 Trade Permit 227 215 218 211 199 260 0 0 0 0 0 0 Monthly Totals 500 395 568 561 487 495 0 0 0 0 0 0 Annual Total To-Date: 3,006 Printed 07/06/2021 16:15 Page 3 of 11 Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 01/01/2021 - 06/30/2021 Construction Applications Received Community& Public Works Department received a total of 527 Construction Applications in June 2021. 800 600 400 200 0 7 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1 11/4....- Commercial - New Commercial -TI Residential - New ® Other Construction Permits Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Commercial-New 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial-TI *6 *10 *14 *11 *16 *6 0 0 0 0 0 0 Residential-New 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial-Trade 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Residential-Trade 0 4 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 Residential-Accessory 1 2 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Demolition *8 *8 *6 *10 *7 *10 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign *10 *10 *14 *12 *18 *11 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other Construction Permits 1 *530 *378 *542 *568 *477 *496 0 0 0 0 0 0 Monthly Totals 560 412 581 602 518 527 0 0 0 0 0 0 Annual Total To-Date: 3,200 *Includes Online Applications. Printed 07/06/2021 16:17 Page 4 of 11 Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 01/01/2021 - 06/30/2021 Land Use Applications Received Community& Public Works Department received a total of 113 Land Use Applications in June 2021. c 1 200 100 ill _ II/ ,,,, Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec = Boundary Line Adjustment Binding Site Plan Preliminary State Environmental Policy 1.1 Short Plat Preliminary Final Platting Act(SEPA) = Long Plat Preliminary Zoning Map/Comp Plan Amendment Administrative Exception/Interpretation " Other Land Use Permits Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Boundary Line Adjustment 2 4 7 1 2 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 Short Plat Preliminary 1 5 0 3 5 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 Long Plat Preliminary 0 1 1 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 Binding Site Plan Preliminary 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Platting 1 2 4 6 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 Zoning Map/Comp Plan Amendment 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA) 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Administrative 0 2 2 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 Exception/Interpretation Other Land Use Permits *94 *100 *150 *125 *95 *95 0 0 0 0 0 0 - Monthly Totals 99 115 165 3 108 Annual Total To-Date: 735 *Includes Online Applications. Printed 07/06/2021 16:17 Page 5 of 11 Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 01/01/2021 - 06/30/2021 Construction Permits Issued Community& Public Works Department issued a total of 501 Construction Permits in June 2021. C 1 600 400 - 200 0 7 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Commercial - New Commercial -TI Residential - New = Other Construction Permits Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Commercial-New 1 7 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial-TI 14 7 10 11 10 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 Residential- New 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial-Trade 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Residential-Trade 0 1 4 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 Residential-Accessory 1 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Demolition 8 10 4 5 4 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign 4 11 9 10 12 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other Construction Permits 350 330 497 526 438 469 0 0 0 0 0 0 Monthly Totals 380 368 529 555 464 501 0 0 0 0 0 0 Annual Total To-Date: 2,797 Printed 07/06/2021 16:18 Page 6 of 11 Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 01/01/2021 - 06/30/2021 Land Use Applications Approved Community& Public Works Department approved a total of 0 Land Use Applications in June 2021. 10 5 0 / Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Boundary Line Adjustment l= Binding Site Plan Preliminary State Environmental Policy Short Plat Preliminary Final Platting Act(SEPA) Long Plat Preliminary Zoning Map/Comp Plan Amendment Administrative Exception/Interpretation = Other Land Use Permits Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Boundary Line Adjustment 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Short Plat Preliminary 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Long Plat Preliminary 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Binding Site Plan Preliminary 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Platting 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Zoning Map/Comp Plan Amendment 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Administrative 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Exception/Interpretation Other Land Use Permits 3 1 4 6 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Monthly Totals 6IMi) Cf';i 0 0 tit Annual Total To-Date: 21 Printed 07/06/2021 16:18 Page 7 of 11 Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 01/01/2021 - 06/30/2021 Development Inspections Performed Community& Public Works Department performed a total of 1,447 Development Inspections in June 2021. Development Inspections include building, planning, engineering and ROW inspections. 2,000 1,500 1,000 500 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2019 2020 2021 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Totals 2021 919 978 1,555 1,666 1,530 1,447 0 0 0 0 0 0 2020 997 1,179 1,233 735 1,406 1,674 1,731 1,559 1,464 1,401 1,137 1,064 2019 1,114 772 1,051 1,402 1,417 1,363 1,300 1,486 1,285 1,527 1,137 1,029 Printed 07/06/2021 16:21 Page 8 of 11 Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 01/01/2021 - 06/30/2021 Code Enforcement Code Enforcement Officers responded to 84 citizen requests in the month of June. They are listed by type below. Please remember that all complaints, even those that have no violation, must be investigated. 1 100 1 50 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec CE-Stop Work Order Environmental = General Nuisance Property Complaint, Non-Violation Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec CE-Stop Work Order 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Complaint,Non-Violation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Environmental 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 General 8 1 0 0 2 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 Nuisance 20 21 40 48 42 48 0 0 0 0 0 0 Property 14 9 18 20 18 31 0 0 0 0 0 0 Monthly Totals 43 31 58 68 62 84 0 0 0 0 0 Annual Total To-Date: 346 Printed 07/06/2021 16:21 Page 9 of 11 Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 01/01/2021 - 06/30/2021 Revenue Community& Public Works Department Revenue totaled $367,253 in June 2021. 1,200,000 1,000,000 800,000 600,000 400,000 2..\ratc:).<0 200,000 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2021 2020 Five-Year Trend Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Totals 2021 $1,087,3 $196,293 $364,569 $459,905 $239,948 $367,253 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,715,278 10 Trend $191,303 $215,857 $273,512 $209,488 $308,880 $239,202 $220,296 $251,287 $228,539 $236,335 $224,434 $205,531 $2,804,663 2020 $230,256 $402,862 $371,956 $237,120 $402,525 $309,668 $226,943 $188,990 $268,487 $254,775 $246,368 $223,685 I$3,363,635 2019 $162,441 $228,717 $265,529 $195,244 $241,906 $233,496 $355,943 $304,988 $228,157 $294,794 $299,906 $349,821 t3,160,942 2018 $177,431 $117,425 $220,845 $206,090 $234,009 $158,168 $260,179 $362,478 $253,342 $270,649 $204,016 $169,751 1$2,634,383 2017 $174,349 $146,874 $133,382 $221,935 $309,558 $265,383 $134,394 $135,242 $149,194 $197,639 $232,319 $159,618 I$2,259,887 2016 $212,038 $183,405 $375,848 $187,053 $356,403 $229,293 $124,020 $264,735 $243,514 $163,819 $139,562 $124,77812,604,468 Printed 07/06/2021 16:22 Page 10 of 11 Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 01/01/2021 - 06/30/2021 Building Permit Valuation Community& Public Works Department Building Permit Valuation totaled $27,704,755 in June 2021. p 200,000,000 150,000,000 100,000,000 50,000,000 f 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2021 2020 Five-Year Trend Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Totals 2021 $8.86M $179.08M $16.72M $32.82M $22.43M $27.70M $0.00M $0.00M $0.00M $0.00M $0.00M $0.00M I $287.61M Trend $14.46M $19.20M $29.27M $17.82M $31.26M $25.19M $22.14M $20.49M $19.65M $14.68M $32.48M $16.91M I $263.54M 2020 $22.13M $20.94M $36.68M $27.67M $51.38M $29.93M $17.95M $7.61M $20.62M $15.27M $26.89M $21.38M $298.45M 2019 $5.66M $22.21M $19.46M $12.46M $23.15M $15.02M $46.65M $18.80M $14.36M $17.16M $35.21M $34.15M I $264.29M 2018 $12.84M $6.35M $27.60M $7.87M $9.55M $26.26M $29.25M $25.44M $20.69M $21.88M $25.46M $6.70M I $219.89M 2017 $23.82M $18.37M $6.98M $30.99M $35.66M $35.63M $9.78M $9.05M $8.88M $10.05M $67.10M $16.78M I $273.01 2016 $7.83M $28.14M $55.64M $10.10M $36.56M $19.11M $7.07M $41.53M $33.68M $9.06M $7.76M $5.52M Printed 07/06/2021 16:22 Page 11 of 11 Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 06/01/21 — 06/30/21 MAINTENANCE Agreements for Services Adopted and In Operation (**Does not include June) P It Contract Total % of Contract Contract Name II Contractor Amount Expended JLExpended treet Maintenance boe Asphalt 1 $1,515,439.95 $444,390.87 29.32% III treet Sweeping ailikAA Sweeping $567,840.00 $213,947.48 37.68% Ftorm Drain CleanhtINIMFAA Sweeping $205,423.73 $46,852.78 22.81% III andscaping renske ME $84,948.00 $674.70 0.79% III Need Spraying 'blearwater $39,000.00 $19,500.00 50.00% mergency Traffic Control l enske $15,000.00 $4,451.82 29.68% jitter and Weed Control IteigerIMIRIE $70,000.00 $12,828.90 18.33% F.tate Highway MaintenancellNSDOT III $281,000.00 $112,303.42 39.97% III 'traffic Signals, Signs, Stripinhpokane County $750,000.00 $349,804.41 46.64% bead Animal Co Mike Pederson $20,000.00 $6,750.00 33.75% Snow Season - October 2020 - April 2021 MI kin Call - Grader Multiple �le • $500,000.00 $8,959.50 1.79% k:In Call - Plow Drivers Multiple -wi $620,000.00 $212,367.29 34.25% Vn Call - Sidewalk Operator Valley Landscape $40,000.00 $15,431.55 38.58% Citizen Requests for Public Works -June 2021 I Request Submitted In Progress Resolved /Waiting ken Sprinkler y 8 2 6 Construction - CPW I 18 0 18 Dead Animal Removal 3 0 3 General Street Maint 13 2 11 Hazard on Street Al 8 0 8 Illegal Dumping - ObjectM 6 0 6 Report a Pothole 111. 2 0 2 =alks - repair ] 1 0 1 Street Sweeping 411 7 0 7 ligetation /Weeds -1 31 5 26 JRMWATER il. 11 2 9 ,Traffic AM 19 0 19 14 0 14 Totals -- 1 STREET MAINTENANCE ACTIVITY The following is a summary of Contractor maintenance activities in the City of Spokane Valley for June 2021: • Geiger Work Crew— Mowing, tree trimming, litter pickup. • Pothole patching, tree trimming and graffiti removal. • Poe Maintenance Contract—Cracksealing and stormwater improvements. Asphalt paving on Mission (Mullan to University), 10th Avenue, Hatherly Circle, Dishman-Mica Frontage Road. Concrete curb, sidewalk and ADA removal and replacement at multiple locations. • AAA sweeping Contract—Arterial maintenance sweeping and residential sweeping continued. • AAA Sweeping Vactor Contract— Cleaning drywells and catch basins. WASTEWATER Status of the process can be monitored at: http://www.spokaneriver.net/, http://www.ecy.wa.gov/geographic/spokane/spokane river basin.htm, http://www.spokanecounty.org/utilities/WaterReclamation/content.aspx?c=2224 and http://www.spokaneriverpartners.com/ STORMWATER UTILITY The following is a summary of City Stormwater Utility activities for June 2021: • Drywell Retrofit with Pavement Preservation (Dept of Ecology grant)—Associated project Argonne Montgomery Intersection project awarded. Project awarded for construction. • Spokane Valley Regional Decant Facility Canopy project: Continued administrative efforts with TML construction to procure material package and associated approval of materials. Continued coordination with WSDOT to secure contributing construction funding. • Appleway Stormwater Improvement project (DOE grant project): Project awarded for construction. • Began discussions with Osborn Engineering to provide services for Public Education and Outreach Effectiveness Study. • Began discussions with City of Spokane and Spokane County to provide multi media Public Education and Outreach. • In concert with the release of the revised Stormwater Management Manual for Eastern Washington (Dept. of Ecology), COSV Stormwater Utility continues effort with City of Spokane, and Spokane County to evaluate the Spokane Regional Stormwater Manual for equivalency. • Continue process to identify the merits for jurisdictional coverage under the UIC program. • Continue MS4/UIC subbasin delineation. • Received comment from Ecology on 2021 UIC stormwater Management Plan. • Continued discussions with City of Spokane, Spokane County, and Osborne Consultant to develop plan to meet effectiveness study requirements of the Municipal Stormwater Permit. • Continued updating the Stormwater Utility 0 & M plan. • Participation and support Glenrose, Central Park Flood Insurance Study. • Continued annual management and/or participation of the following service contracts: o Roadway Landscape Maintenance Contract—Senske. o Street Sweeping Contract—AAA Sweeping. o Storm Drain Cleaning Contract—AAA Sweeping. o Roadway Weed Control Contract— Clearwater Summit. • Continued working on the following tasks: o Responded to stormwater related issues, 11 sites. Recorded in QAlert. 2 DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING The following is a summary of Development Engineering activities for June 2021: • Assisted Building and Planning Division with preparation of design requirements for (9) Commercial and (13) Land Use Pre-Application meetings. • Prepared multiple Recommended Conditions of Approvals for preliminary plats and Dedication Languages for final plats. Reviewed multiple final plats and submittal packages to record final plats. • Reviewed civil plans and drainage reports for Engineered Grading Permits associated with commercial and land use projects. Coordinated with private Engineers and Developers. • Reviewed civil plans for the following projects: o Korolyuk Residence (EGR-2020-0106) o Shiva Short Plat—3 lots (EGR-2021-0014) o Christ Fellowship Baptist Church (EGR-2021-0022) o Spring Tools Phase 2 (EGR-2021-0023) o Northwest Industrial Services Grading (EGR-2021-0029) o Mirabeau Place Apartments—Grading Only (EGR-2021-0033) o 4th Avenue Apartments (EGR-2021-0037) o Atvtracks.net (EGR-2021-0039) o Summerfield East 11th Add—5 lots (EGR-2021-0040) o Main Assisted Living (EGR-2021-0043) o McGriff Private Driveway (EGR-2021-0044) o Flora Road Short Plat—7 lots (EGR-2021-0046) o Piger 2 Short Plat—6 lots (EGR-2021-0047) • Spoke with and emailed citizens and developers to answer inquiries and discuss design requirements for potential commercial and land use projects. • Conducted preconstruction meetings, performed site visits, prepared punch lists, reviewed surety estimates, and reviewed and approved construction certification packages to finalize final plats and to issue commercial building certificates of occupancy. 3 CAPITAL PROJECTS eves a Public Works Projects .Valley. Monthly Summary-Design & Construction Vd June-2021 Bid % Estimated Total Proposed Project# Design&Construction Projects Funding Open Complete Construction Project Ad Date Date PE I CN Completion Cost Street Projects 0143 Barker Rd/BNSF Grade Separation FHWA-STP(U) 11/30/20 01/13/21 100 15 12/31/22 $26,000,000 0205 Sprague/Barker Intersection Improvement FHWA-CMAQ TBD TBD 70 0 12/31/22 $ 2,300,000 0249 Sullivan&Wellesley Intersection Improv FHWA-STP(U) TBD TBD 95 0 12/31/22 $ 1,370,000 0275 Barker Rd Widening-River to Euclid FHWA-STP(U) 06/12/20 07/08/20 100 99 12/31/21 $ 3,850,141 0299 Argonne Rd Concrete Pvmt Indiana to Mont TIB-UAP 04/30/21 05/14/21 100 0 12/31/21 $ 2,800,000 0301 Park Rd.Sidewalk COSV 02/26/21 03/19/21 100 25 12/31/21 $ 733,000 0310 Sullivan Rd Overcrossing UP RR Deck Rep. FHWA-BR 03/19/21 04/09/21 100 10 12/31/21 $ 337,625 0313 Barker Road/Union Pacific Crossing FMSIB TBD TBD 100 0 12/31/22 $ 1,434,000 0318 Wilbur Sidewalk:Boone to Mission STBG-SA TBD TBD 10 0 12/31/22 $ 60,000 Street Preservation Projects 0292 Mullan Preservation:Broadway-Mission COSV 05/21/21 06/04/21 100 5 12/31/21 $ 2,100,000 0309 Local Access Streets:Barker Homes COSV 04/24/20 05/20/20 100 99 12/31/21 $ 1,812,088 0320 Sullivan Preservation:Sprague-8th COSV TBD TBD 75 0 12/31/21 $ 138,000 0323 Evergreen Road Preservation Project COSV 04/30/21 05/14/21 100 50 12/31/21 $ 1,900,000 0325 2021 Local Access Streets:South Park Rd COSV 06/11/21 06/25/21 100 0 12/31/21 $ 1,200,000 Traffic Projects 0293 2018 CSS Citywide Reflective Signal BP HSIP N/A N/A 100 96 12/31/21 $ 180,000 0294 Citywide Reflective Post Panels HSIP N/A N/A 100 90 12/31/21 $ 78,000 0300 Pines&Mission Intersection Improvement FHWA-CMAQ TBD TBD 60 0 12/31/22 $ 588,000 0326 2020 Citywide Reflective Post Panels HSIP TBD TBD 0 0 12/31/22 $ 164,100 0330 WTSC 2021 School Zone Beacons WTSC N/A N/A 0 0 12/31/22 $ 60,000 Parks Projects 0268 Appleway Trail-Evergreen to Sullivan FHWA-STP(U) 06/28/19 07/19/19 100 100 12/31/20 $ 2,516,550 0304 CenterPlace West Lawn Phase 2 COSV 11/22/19 12/20/19 100 100 12/31/20 $ 2,000,000 0305 CenterPlace Roof Repair COSV 05/01/20 05/15/20 100 100 12/31/20 $ 815,000 0314 Balfour Park Frontage Improvements COSV 03/19/21 04/09/21 100 0 12/31/21 $ 1,003,215 0315 Brown's Park 2020 Improvements COSV Re-Bid 10/23/20 11/13/20 100 100 06/30/21 $ 562,780 0316 Balfour Park Improvements-Phase 1 COSV TBD TBD 0 0 TBD $ 217,500 Stormwater Projects 0308 Regional Decant Facility Canopy Dept of Ecology 02/05/21 02/19/21 100 10 12/31/21 $ 595,535 0317 Appleway Stormwater Improvements Dept of Ecology 04/30/21 05/21/21 100 0 12/31/21 $ 2,002,256 0327 Sprague Avenue Stormwater Improvements Dept of Ecology TBD TBD 0 0 12/31/22 $ 150,000 Design % Total Project# Design Only Projects Funding Complete Complete Project Date PE Cost Street Projects 0223 Pines Rd Underpass @ BNSF&Trent FHWA-STP(U) 12/31/21 28 $ 7,295,000 0311 Sullivan Rd./SR 2901nterchange Project COSV 12/31/23 10 $ 500,000 0321 Argonne Corridor Imprv-North of Knox COSV 12/31/21 5 $ 30,000 0329 Barker Road Imp-City Limits to Appleway 0 $ 250,000 Street Preservation Projects 0286 Broadway Preservation:Havana to Fancher COSV 03/31/21 70 $ 67,600 4 PLANNING AND GRANTS Washington Traffic Safety Commission In May, City Council authorized staff to submit a $60,000 grant request for the installation of three pairs of school zone flashing beacons. Locations were at the Horizon Middle School, Continuous Curriculum School, and City School. The City was awarded $51,000 and will provide a $9,000 local match. Installation is expected to occur by November 2021. Spokane Transit Authority's Federal Section 5310 Grants Call for Projects On April 27, City Council authorized staff to submit one application: Sprague Ave. Crossing Improvements.This project would provide a new pedestrian hybrid beacon crossing of Sprague between City Hall and the Balfour Park/Library site. On June 11, the call for projects was cancelled and reissued under a revised scoring criteria. Staff submitted its revised application for the same project on July 13 and awards are expected to be announced by fall 2021. Spokane Regional Transportation Council (SRTC) Preservation Call for Projects On March 23, City Council authorized staff to submit three applications: Broadway Ave. at 1-90 (Fancher to Park), Sprague Ave. (Havana to Fancher), and Evergreen Rd. (Broadway to Mission). Awards are anticipated in fall 2021. WSDOT's Local Bridge Program WSDOT administers the Federal Highway Bridge Program funding via its Local Bridge Program. An application was submitted in February requesting$225,830 to complete a deck seal across the Mission Ave. bridge over Evergreen Rd. The total cost is estimated at$261,075, $35,245 of which is a local match. Awards are anticipated in summer 2021. WSDOT's Asset Management Program WSDOT administers the National Highway System Asset Management Program. An application was submitted in February requesting $1,029,000 to complete a pavement preservation project on S. Sullivan Road from Sprague Ave. to 8th Ave. The total project cost is estimated at $2,212,000, $1,183,000 of which is a local match. In June, WSDOT awarded the City its full requested amount. USDOT's Infrastructure for Rebuilding America (INFRA) USDOT administers the INFRA program. In March, a joint application with Spokane County was submitted for the Bigelow-Sullivan Corridor project. This 2021 application requested $33,643,631 of INFRA funds for a total project cost of$59,881,446.The City was not successful in its application and will have a debrief with USDOT in August. USDOT's Rebuilding America's Infrastructure with Sustainability and Equity(RAISE) USDOT administers the RAISE program and, in May, announced the availability of$1 billion nationwide. On May 25, City Council authorized the City Manager to apply for the Pines Road/BNSF GSP project requesting $16,239,622. An application was submitted on July 9, 2021. Awards are anticipated by fall 2021. Federal Funding Solicitations for Infrastructure Priorities The offices of Senator Patty Murray, Senator Maria Cantwell, and Representative Cathy McMorris Rodgers requested priority project details for inclusion into a federal transportation package (i.e. earmarks). Staff submitted the following five priority projects for consideration: Pines GSP($19.3M), Bigelow-Sullivan Corridor($36.73M), Spokane Valley River Loop Trail ($16.5M), Spokane County Expo Expansion ($3M), and South Barker Corridor ($12.92M). Rep. McMorris Rodgers included a $2.65M request for the engineering phase of the Sullivan/Trent Interchange project. Sen. Cantwell included a$2.5M request towards the Pines Road/BNSF GSP.Sen. Murray included$3M to the S. Barker Road Corridor. Committees will be reviewing the project lists through the summer and more information will be made available in late summer or fall 2021. Pavement Management Update On March 23, 2021, City Council confirmed the creation of the Streets Sustainability Committee. The goal of the committee is to gather public input regarding pavement condition goals and treatment methods, along with the necessary funding to support it. The committee includes 23 members representing a variety of stakeholder groups throughout the community. Committee information is available on the City's webpage: www.spokanevalley.org/streetscomm ittee 5 FINANCE DEPARTMENT SpokaneCITY Chelsie Taylor,Finance Director 48000 Val 10210 E Sprague Avenue • Spokane Valley WA 99206 LLii Phone: (509)720-5000 •Fax: (509)720-5075 • www.spokanevalley.org Memorandum To: Mark Calhoun, City Manager From: Chelsie Taylor, Finance Director Date: July 21, 2021 Re: Finance Department Activity Report—June 2021 Following is information pertaining to Finance Department activities through the end of June 2021 and included herein is an updated 2021 Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures through the end of June. 2020 Year-end Process The 2020 books were closed in April and the annual financial report was completed and filed in May. We hope to have the State Auditor's Office on site by end of July to begin the audit of 2020. 2022 Budclet Development The 2022 Budget development process began in the Finance Department in early March, and on April 6th we sent detailed budget requests to all departments to complete by mid-May. By the time the budget is scheduled to be adopted on November 9th, the Council will have had an opportunity to discuss the budget on seven occasions including three public hearings. • June 15 Council budget workshop • August 17 Admin report on 2022 revenues and expenditures • September 14 Public hearing #1 on the 2022 revenues and expenditures • September 21 City Manager's presentation of preliminary 2022 Budget • October 12 Public hearing #2 on 2022 Budget • October 26 First reading on proposed ordinance adopting the 2022 Budget • November 9 Public hearing #3 on the 2022 Budget • November 9 Second reading on proposed ordinance adopting the 2022 Budget 2022 Property Tax Levy A significant part of the budget development process includes the annual levy of property taxes which in 2022 are expected to account for approximately 25.13% of recurring General Fund revenues. Council discussions specifically related to this topic will take place at the following meetings: • September 14 Public hearing on 2022 revenues including property taxes • September 21 Admin Report on proposed ordinance levying 2022 property taxes • October 12 First reading of ordinance levying 2022 property taxes and confirming tax levy • October 26 Second reading of ordinance levying 2022 property taxes and confirming tax levy P:1FinancelFinance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports1202112021 06 30.docx Page 1 Outside Aciency Fundinci in the 2022 Budciet The City has historically provided funding for local organizations involved in either social services or economic development activities and the preliminary 2022 Budget currently has $244,000 collectively available for this, with $62,000 being set aside for contracted economic development. The schedule leading to awarding funds is as follows: • July 16 Letters mailed to agencies that have historically received funding, media release to City website and notice to newspapers • August 13 Agency requests are due at City Hall • September 21 Economic development and social service agency presentations to Council • October 26 Council makes final determination of awards Budciet to Actual Comparison Report A report reflecting 2021 Budget to Actual Revenues and Expenditures for those funds for which a 2021 Budget was adopted is located on pages 5 through 18. Because we attempt to provide this information in a timely manner, this report is prepared from records that are not formally closed by the Finance Department at month end or reconciled to bank records. Although it is realistic to expect the figures will change over subsequent weeks, I believe the report is materially accurate. We've included the following information in the report: • Revenues by source for all funds, and expenditures by department in the General Fund and by type in all other funds. • A breakdown between recurring and nonrecurring revenues and expenditures in the General Fund, Street O&M Fund and Stormwater Fund. • The change in fund balance including beginning and ending figures. The beginning fund balance figures are those that are reflected in our 2020 Annual Financial Report. • Columns of information include: o The 2021 Budget as adopted o June 2021 activity o Cumulative 2021 activity through June 2021 o Budget remaining in terms of dollars o The percent of budgeted revenue collected or budgeted expenditures disbursed A few points related to the General Fund #001 (page 5): Recurring revenues collections are currently at 51.53% of the amount budgeted with 50.00% of the year elapsed. • Property taxes are paid to Spokane County in two installments each year on April 30 and October 31 and are then remitted to the City primarily in May and November with lesser amounts typically remitted in June and December. Property taxes received thus far in 2021 are $6,241,327 or 49.05% of the amount budgeted. • Sales tax collections represent only 5-months of collections thus far because taxes collected in June are not remitted to the City by the State until the latter part of July. Collections are currently at $12,916,706 or 51.26% of the amount budgeted. • Gambling taxes are at$98,207 or 25.57% of the amount budgeted. Gambling taxes are paid quarterly with second quarter payments due by July 31st. • Franchise Fee and Business Registration revenues are typically received in the month following a calendar year quarter. So far in 2021 we have received $379,815 or 31.26% of the amount budgeted. P:1FinancelFinance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports1202112021 06 30.docx Page 2 • State shared revenues are composed of State of Washington distributions that include items such as liquor board profits, liquor excise tax, streamlined sales tax mitigation and criminal justice monies. Most of these revenues are paid by the State in the month following a calendar quarter. Through June we've received remittances totaling $887,978 or 50.45% of the amount budgeted. • Fines and forfeitures revenues are composed of monthly remittances from Spokane County with payments made in the month following the actual assessment of a fine and false alarm fees. Through June we've received remittances through the month of May with receipts of $196,180 or 19.42% of the amount budgeted. This amount is lower than average this year because of a change in accounting rules that requires the City to account for the passed through District Court revenues in a separate custodial fund. There will be a future budget amendment moving those passed through revenues to the new fund. • Community and Public Works service revenues are largely composed of building permit and plan review fees as well as right of way permits. Revenues are currently at$2,667,748 or 139.77% of the amount budgeted. • Recreation program revenues are composed of revenues generated by the variety of parks and recreation programs including classes, swimming pools (in-season), and CenterPlace. Currently, revenues total $116,040 or 18.03% of the amount budgeted. Recurring expenditures are currently at$18,945,984 or 41.69% of the amount budgeted with 50.00% of the year elapsed. Investments (page 19) Investments at June 30 total $82,456,585 and are composed of $77,377,927 in the Washington State Local Government Investment Pool and $5,078,658 in bank CDs. Total Sales Tax Receipts (page 20) Total sales tax receipts reflect State remittances through June and total $14,416,931 including general, criminal justice, and public safety taxes. This figure is$4,221,926 or 41.41% greater than the same five-month period in 2020. Economic Indicators (pages 21 —23) The following economic indicators provide information pertaining to three different sources of tax revenue that provide a good gauge of the health and direction of the overall economy. 1. Sales taxes (page 21) provide a sense of how much individuals and businesses are spending on the purchase of goods. 2. Hotel / Motel taxes (page 22) provide us with a sense of overnight stays and visits to our area by tourists or business travelers. 3. Real Estate Excise taxes (page 23) provide us with a sense of real estate sales. Page 21 provides a 10-year history of general sales tax receipts (not including public safety or criminal justice) with monthly detail beginning January 2012. • Compared with calendar year 2020, 2021 collections have increased by $3,919,068 or 43.56%. • Tax receipts reached an all-time high in 2020 of $25,238,481, besting the previous record year of 2019 when $24,204,762 was collected. P:1FinancelFinance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports1202112021 06 30.docx Page 3 Page 22 provides a 10-year history of hotel/motel tax receipts with monthly detail beginning January 2012. • Compared with calendar year 2020, 2021 collections have increased by $34,563 or 23.59%. • Collections reached an all-time high in 2019 of $743,851, and subsequently decreased to $443,243 in 2020. • The decrease in 2020 reflects the effects of COVID-19 on the economy. Page 23 provides a 10-year history of real estate excise tax receipts with monthly detail beginning January 2012. • Compared with calendar year 2020, 2021 collections have increased by$794,168 or 71.17%. • Collections reached an all-time high in 2018 of$3,800,432, and subsequently decreased to a range of approximately $3,334,000 to $3,658,000 in the years 2019 through 2020. Debt Capacity and Bonds Outstandinci (page 24) This page provides information on the City's debt capacity, or the dollar amount of General Obligation (G.O.) Bonds the City may issue, as well as an amortization schedule of the bonds the City currently has outstanding. • The maximum amount of G.O. bonds the City may issue is determined by the assessed value for property taxes which for 2021 is $11,553,065,482. Following the December 1, 2020 debt service payments, the City has $11,120,000 of nonvoted G.O. bonds outstanding which represents 6.42% of our nonvoted bond capacity, and 1.28% of our total debt capacity for all types of bonds. Of this amount: o $4,100,000 remains on bonds issued for the construction of CenterPlace. These bonds are repaid with a portion of the 1/10 of 1% sales tax that is collected by the Spokane Public Facilities District. o $450,000 remains on bonds issued for road and street improvements around CenterPlace. The bonds are repaid with a portion of the real estate excise tax collected by the City. o $6,570,000 remains on bonds issued for construction of the new City Hall. The bonds are to be repaid with General Fund revenues. Street Fund Revenue Sources (pages 25 and 26) The last two charts reflect a history for the two primary sources of revenue in Street Fund #101. These include: Page 25 provides a 10-year history of Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax collections with monthly detail beginning January 2012. • Compared with calendar year 2020, 2021 collections have increased by $38,844 or 5.63%. • Tax receipts peaked in 2007 at just approximately $2.1 million, and have generally ranged around $2 million in the years 2012 through 2020. Page 26 provides a 10-year history of Telephone Utility Tax collections with monthly detail beginning January 2012. • Compared with 2020, 2021 collections have decreased by $163,035 or 26.95%. Unlike tax revenues collected by the State and remitted monthly, these taxes are paid to the City directly by the service provider. Consequently there is not a "clean cutoff' in terms of when a vendor pays the tax. • Tax receipts peaked in 2009 at$3,054,473 and have decreased each year since, due to what we suspect is the reduction in land lines by individual households. • The 2021 budget is set at $1,000,000. We will watch actual receipts closely as the year progresses. P:1FinancelFinance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports1202112021 06 30.docx Page 4 P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2021\2021 06 30 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA Budget Year 2021 Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures Elapsed= 50.00% For the Six-Month Period Ended June 30,2021 2021 Actual Actual through Budget %of Budget June June 30 Remaining Budget #001 -GENERAL FUND RECURRING ACTIVITY Revenues Property Tax 12,724,200 1,469,901 6,241,327 (6,482,873) 49.05% Sales Tax 25,200,000 2,768,743 12,916,706 (12,283,294) 51.26% Sales Tax-Public Safety 1,160,000 117,532 540,872 (619,128) 46.63% Sales Tax-Criminal Justice 2,040,000 209,430 959,353 (1,080,647) 47.03% Gambling Tax and Leasehold Excise Tax 384,000 902 98,207 (285,793) 25.57% Franchise Fees/Business Registration 1,215,000 18,448 379,815 (835,185) 31.26% State Shared Revenues 1,760,000 276,227 887,978 (872,022) 50.45% Fines, Forfeitures and Penalties 1,010,200 31,021 196,180 (814,020) 19.42% Community and Public Works 1,908,719 294,777 2,667,748 759,029 139.77% Recreation Program Revenues 643,600 65,378 116,040 (527,560) 18.03% Miscellaneous Department Revenue 21,000 0 20,588 (412) 98.04% Miscellaneous&Investment Interest 592,500 10,453 64,055 (528,445) 10.81% Transfers in-#105(h/m tax-CP advertising) 30,000 0 0 (30,000) 0.00% Total Recurring Revenues 48,689,219 5,262,810 25,088,870 (23,600,349) 51.53% Expenditures City Council 638,672 34,239 280,954 357,718 43.99% City Manager 1,163,839 85,056 492,761 671,078 42.34% City Attorney 718,593 64,241 345,516 373,077 48.08% Public Safety 28,383,761 2,046,959 12,915,820 15,467,941 45.50% Deputy City Manager 284,844 21,943 125,244 159,600 43.97% Finance/IT 1,500,659 100,862 644,352 856,307 42.94% Human Resources 318,540 24,811 151,627 166,913 47.60% City Hall Operations and Maintenance 373,601 27,052 166,696 206,905 44.62% Community&Public Works-Engineering 2,098,642 137,377 824,572 1,274,070 39.29% Community&Public Works-Econ Dev 1,097,061 79,224 399,091 697,970 36.38% Community&Public Works-Bldg&Plan 2,414,558 193,660 1,176,567 1,237,991 48.73% Parks&Rec-Administration 355,427 21,152 156,062 199,365 43.91% Parks&Rec-Maintenance 940,003 71,737 413,271 526,732 43.96% Parks&Rec-Recreation 328,534 17,709 76,016 252,518 23.14% Parks&Rec-Aquatics 510,053 9,601 21,930 488,124 4.30% Parks&Rec-Senior Center 35,403 2,865 14,847 20,556 41.94% Parks&Rec-CenterPlace 972,214 67,977 341,463 630,751 35.12% General Government 1,297,380 54,629 399,194 898,186 30.77% Transfers out-#204('16 LTGO bond debt service) 401,500 0 0 401,500 0.00% Transfers out-#309(park capital projects) 160,000 0 0 160,000 0.00% Transfers out-#311 (pavement preservation) 991,843 0 0 991,843 0.00% Transfers out-#501 (CenterPlace kitchen reserve) 36,600 0 0 36,600 0.00% Transfers out-#502(insurance premium) 425,000 0 0 425,000 0.00% Total Recurring Expenditures 45,446,727 3,061,094 18,945,984 26,500,743 41.69% Recurring Revenues Over(Under) Recurring Expenditures 3,242,492 2,201,716 6,142,885 2,900,393 Page 5 P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2021\2021 06 30 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA Budget Year 2021 Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures Elapsed= 50.00% For the Six-Month Period Ended June 30,2021 2021 Actual Actual through Budget %of Budget June June 30 Remaining Budget #001 -GENERAL FUND-continued NONRECURRING ACTIVITY Revenues Grant Proceeds 49,000 98,096 113,831 64,831 232.31% Total Nonrecurring Revenues 49,000 98,096 113,831 64,831 232.31% Expenditures City Manager(office furniture for Housing Sery empl 5,000 2,969 2,969 2,031 59.39% Public Safety(replace HVAC units at Precinct) 62,000 0 0 62,000 0.00% Public Safety(replace handguns) 37,500 0 0 37,500 0.00% Public Safety(radar trailer) 11,400 0 0 11,400 0.00% Public Safety(Precinct access control gate) 20,000 0 0 20,000 0.00% Public Safety(Precinct fire panel replacement) 10,000 0 0 10,000 0.00% Public Safety(Equipment for bike patrols) 0 0 4,570 (4,570) 0.00% Public Safety(DEMS/TasersBodyCams) 109,608 0 0 109,608 0.00% City Hall Chambers(east wall repairs) 0 24,601 189,880 (189,880) 0.00% City Hall(replace light pole) 0 3,655 3,655 (3,655) 0.00% Community&Public Works(Ecology SMP Update; 25,000 0 10,585 14,415 42.34% Community&Public Works(Housing Action Plan) 0 1,803 44,992 (44,992) 0.00% Windstorm 2021 Cleanup Costs 32,000 0 0 32,000 0.00% General Government-IT capital replacements 212,800 0 0 212,800 0.00% General Government(Covid-19 Related Costs) 0 0 0 0 0.00% Transfers out-#101 (Street Fund operations) 2,552,600 0 0 2,552,600 0.00% Transfers out-#122(replenish reserve) 364,440 0 0 364,440 0.00% Transfers out-#309(CenterPlace west lawn) 14,876 0 0 14,876 0.00% Transfers out-#309(CenterPlace roof repairs) 12,227 0 0 12,227 0.00% Transfers out-#312('19 fund bal>50%) 11,126,343 0 0 11,126,343 0.00% Total Nonrecurring Expenditures 14,595,794 33,028 256,651 14,339,143 1.76% Nonrecurring Revenues Over(Under) Nonrecurring Expenditures (14,546,794) 65,068 (142,820) 14,403,974 Excess(Deficit)of Total Revenues Over(Under)Total Expenditures (11,304,302) 2,266,784 6,000,065 17,304,367 Beginning fund balance 42,516,032 42,516,032 Ending fund balance 31,211,730 48,516,097 Page 6 P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2021\2021 06 30 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA Budget Year 2021 Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures Elapsed= 50.00% For the Six-Month Period Ended June 30,2021 2021 Actual Actual through Budget %of Budget June June 30 Remaining Budget SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS #101 -STREET FUND RECURRING ACTIVITY Revenues Telephone Utility Tax 1,000,000 94,348 441,333 (558,667) 44.13% Motor Vehicle Fuel(Gas)Tax 1,800,000 174,968 725,967 (1,074,033) 40.33% Multimodal Transportation 130,600 32,711 65,422 (65,178) 50.09% Right-of-Way Maintenance Fee 70,000 5,904 10,494 (59,506) 14.99% Investment Interest 4,000 10 123 (3,877) 3.08% Miscellaneous Revenue 10,000 6,259 56,583 46,583 565.83% Total Recurring Revenues 3,014,600 314,202 1,299,922 (1,714,678) 43.12% Expenditures Wages/Benefits/Payroll Taxes 1,127,920 70,117 533,304 594,616 47.28% Supplies 156,050 19,773 85,044 71,006 54.50% Services&Charges 2,525,828 157,798 807,717 1,718,111 31.98% Snow Operations 751,652 13,896 383,460 368,192 51.02% Intergovernmental Payments 935,000 176,565 314,181 620,819 33.60% Transfers out-#501 (non-plow vehicle rental) 10,250 0 0 10,250 0.00% Transfers out-#501 (plow replace) 60,500 0 0 60,500 0.00% Total Recurring Expenditures 5,567,200 438,149 2,123,705 3,443,495 38.15% Recurring Revenues Over(Under) Recurring Expenditures (2,552,600) (123,947) (823,783) 1,728,817 NONRECURRING ACTIVITY Revenues Insurance Proceeds(traffic signal cabinet) 0 1,827 18,428 18,428 0.00% Utilities Tax Recovery 0 0 50,472 50,472 0.00% Transfers in-#001 2,552,600 0 0 (2,552,600) 0.00% Total Nonrecurring Revenues 2,552,600 1,827 68,900 (2,483,700) 2.70% Expenditures Emergency Traffic Control Repairs 0 6,453 18,485 (18,485) 0.00% Total Nonrecurring Expenditures 0 6,453 18,485 (18,485) 0.00% Nonrecurring Revenues Over(Under) Nonrecurring Expenditures 2,552,600 (4,626) 50,415 (2,502,185) Excess(Deficit)of Total Revenues Over(Under)Total Expenditures 0 (128,573) (773,368) (773,368) Beginning fund balance 759,299 759,299 Ending fund balance 759,299 (14,069) #103-PATHS&TRAILS Revenues Motor Vehicle Fuel(Gas)Tax 8,700 738 3,062 (5,638) 35.19% Investment Interest 200 1 8 (192) 3.90% Total revenues 8,900 739 3,070 (5,830) 34.49% Expenditures Capital Outlay 0 0 0 0 0.00% Total expenditures 0 0 0 0 0.00% Revenues over(under)expenditures 8,900 739 3,070 (5,830) Beginning fund balance 21,516 21,516 Ending fund balance 30,416 24,585 Page 7 P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2021\2021 06 30 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA Budget Year 2021 Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures Elapsed= 50.00% For the Six-Month Period Ended June 30,2021 2021 Actual Actual through Budget %of Budget June June 30 Remaining Budget SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS-continued #104-TOURISM FACILITIES HOTEL/MOTEL TAX FUND Revenues Tourism Facilities Hotel/Motel Tax 213,000 31,800 117,507 (95,493) 55.17% Investment Interest 24,000 160 1,025 (22,975) 4.27% Transfers in-#105 453,840 0 0 (453,840) 0.00% Total revenues 690,840 31,960 118,532 (572,308) 17.16% Expenditures Capital Outlay 0 0 0 0 0.00% Total expenditures 0 0 0 0 0.00% Revenues over(under)expenditures 690,840 31,960 118,532 (572,308) Beginning fund balance 2,986,573 2,986,573 Ending fund balance 3,677,413 3,105,105 #105-HOTEL/MOTEL TAX FUND Revenues Hotel/Motel Tax 346,000 49,002 181,060 (164,940) 52.33% Investment Interest 6,000 50 299 (5,701) 4.99% Total revenues 352,000 49,052 181,359 (170,641) 51.52% Expenditures Transfers out-#001 30,000 0 0 30,000 0.00% Transfers out-#104 453,840 0 0 453,840 0.00% Tourism Promotion 224,400 0 5,371 219,029 2.39% Total expenditures 708,240 0 5,371 702,869 0.76% Revenues over(under)expenditures (356,240) 49,052 175,988 (873,510) Beginning fund balance 798,716 798,716 Ending fund balance 442,476 974,704 #106-SOLID WASTE Revenues Solid Waste Administrative Fees 225,000 14,042 81,752 143,248 36.33% Solid Waste Road Wear Fee 1,500,000 164,111 740,646 759,354 49.38% Investment Interest 12,000 69 493 11,507 4.11% Total revenues 1,737,000 178,222 822,891 914,109 47.37% Expenditures Transfers out-#311 1,500,000 0 0 1,500,000 0.00% Education&Contract Administration 237,000 5,121 24,643 212,357 10.40% Total expenditures 1,737,000 5,121 24,643 1,712,357 1.42% Revenues over(under)expenditures 0 173,101 798,248 (798,248) Beginning fund balance 726,788 726,788 Ending fund balance 726,788 1,525,036 #107-PEG FUND Revenues Comcast PEG Contribution 79,000 0 18,435 60,565 23.34% Investment Interest 0 10 63 (63) 0.00% Total revenues 79,000 10 18,498 60,502 23.42% Expenditures PEG Reimbursement-CMTV 39,500 0 0 39,500 0.00% Capital Outlay 33,500 3,284 4,171 29,329 12.45% Total expenditures 73,000 3,284 4,171 68,829 5.71% Revenues over(under)expenditures 6,000 (3,274) 14,327 (8,327) Beginning fund balance 181,773 181,773 Ending fund balance 187,773 196,101 Page 8 P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2021\2021 06 30 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA Budget Year 2021 Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures Elapsed= 50.00% For the Six-Month Period Ended June 30,2021 2021 Actual Actual through Budget %of Budget June June 30 Remaining Budget SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS-continued #108-AFFORDABLE&SUPPORTIVE HOUSING TAX FUND Revenues Affordable&Supportive Housing Tax 193,000 0 54,437 138,563 28.21% Investment Interest 0 11 66 (66) 0.00% Total revenues 193,000 11 54,503 138,497 28.24% Expenditures Affordable&Supportive Housing Program 0 0 0 0 0.00% Total expenditures 0 0 0 0 0.00% Revenues over(under)expenditures 193,000 11 54,503 138,497 Beginning fund balance 152,033 152,033 Ending fund balance 345,033 206,537 #120-CENTER PLACE OPERATING RESERVE FUND Revenues Investment Interest 0 0 0 0 0.00% Transfers in 0 0 0 0 0.00% Total revenues 0 0 0 0 0.00% Expenditures Operations 0 0 0 0 0.00% Total expenditures 0 0 0 0 0.00% Revenues over(under)expenditures 0 0 0 0 Beginning fund balance 300,000 300,000 Ending fund balance 300,000 300,000 #121 -SERVICE LEVEL STABILIZATION RESERVE FUND Revenues Investment Interest 0 0 0 0 0.00% Transfers in 0 0 0 0 0.00% Total revenues 0 0 0 0 0.00% Expenditures Operations 0 0 0 0 0.00% Total expenditures 0 0 0 0 0.00% Revenues over(under)expenditures 0 0 0 0 Beginning fund balance 5,500,000 5,500,000 Ending fund balance 5,500,000 5,500,000 #122-WINTER WEATHER RESERVE FUND Revenues Investment Interest 1,900 8 43 (1,857) 2.25% Transfers in-#001 364,440 0 0 (364,440) 0.00% Subtotal revenues 366,340 8 43 (366,297) 0.01% Expenditures Snow removal expenses 500,000 0 0 500,000 0.00% Transfers out-#101 0 0 0 0 0.00% Total expenditures 500,000 0 0 500,000 0.00% Revenues over(under)expenditures (133,660) 8 43 (866,297) Beginning fund balance 160,043 160,043 Ending fund balance 26,383 160,086 Page 9 P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2021\2021 06 30 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA Budget Year 2021 Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures Elapsed= 50.00% For the Six-Month Period Ended June 30,2021 2021 Actual Actual through Budget %of Budget June June 30 Remaining Budget DEBT SERVICE FUNDS #204-DEBT SERVICE FUND Revenues Spokane Public Facilities District 480,800 0 80,400 (400,400) 16.72% Transfers in-#001 401,500 0 0 (401,500) 0.00% Transfers in-#301 80,775 0 0 (80,775) 0.00% Transfers in-#302 80,775 0 0 (80,775) 0.00% Total revenues 1,043,850 0 80,400 (963,450) 7.70% Expenditures Debt Service Payments-CenterPlace 480,800 0 80,400 400,400 16.72% Debt Service Payments-Roads 161,550 0 8,275 153,275 5.12% Debt Service Payments-'16 LTGO Bond 401,500 0 115,750 285,750 28.83% Total expenditures 1,043,850 0 204,425 839,425 19.58% Revenues over(under)expenditures 0 0 (124,025) (1,802,875) Beginning fund balance 0 0 Ending fund balance 0 (124,025) Page 10 P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2021\2021 06 30 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA Budget Year 2021 Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures Elapsed= 50.00% For the Six-Month Period Ended June 30,2021 2021 Actual Actual through Budget %of Budget June June 30 Remaining Budget CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS #301 -CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND Revenues REET 1 -Taxes 1,000,000 190,173 955,047 (44,953) 95.50% Investment Interest 25,000 154 977 (24,023) 3.91% Total revenues 1,025,000 190,328 956,024 (68,976) 93.27% Expenditures Transfers out-#204 80,775 0 0 80,775 0.00% Transfers out-#303 316,620 0 3,969 312,651 1.25% Transfers out-#311 (pavement preservation) 827,278 0 0 827,278 0.00% Total expenditures 1,224,673 0 3,969 1,220,704 0.32% Revenues over(under)expenditures (199,673) 190,328 952,055 (1,289,680) Beginning fund balance 2,048,068 2,048,068 Ending fund balance 1,848,395 3,000,124 #302-SPECIAL CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND Revenues REET 2-Taxes 1,000,000 190,173 955,047 (44,953) 95.50% Investment Interest 25,000 313 1,961 (23,039) 7.84% Total revenues 1,025,000 190,487 957,008 (67,992) 93.37% Expenditures Transfers out-#204 80,775 0 0 80,775 0.00% Transfers out-#303 1,662,684 0 24,735 1,637,949 1.49% Transfers out-#311 (pavement preservation) 827,279 0 0 827,279 0.00% Transfers out-#314 1,127,387 0 0 1,127,387 0.00% Total expenditures 3,698,125 0 24,735 3,673,390 0.67% Revenues over(under)expenditures (2,673,125) 190,487 932,273 (3,741,382) Beginning fund balance 5,165,924 5,165,924 Ending fund balance 2,492,799 6,098,197 Page 11 P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2021\2021 06 30 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA Budget Year 2021 Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures Elapsed= 50.00% For the Six-Month Period Ended June 30,2021 2021 Actual Actual through Budget %of Budget June June 30 Remaining Budget CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS-continued #303 STREET CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND Revenues Developer Contribution 53,703 0 0 (53,703) 0.00% Grant Proceeds 6,843,308 313,979 927,615 (5,915,693) 13.56% Transfers in-#301 316,620 0 3,969 (312,651) 1.25% Transfers in-#302 1,662,684 0 24,735 (1,637,949) 1.49% Transfers in-#312 0 0 249 249 0.00% Investment Interest 0 17 201 201 0.00% Total revenues 8,876,315 313,997 956,768 (7,919,547) 10.78% Expenditures 205 Sprague/Barker Intersection Improvement 329,453 12,477 21,283 308,170 6.46% 249 Sullivan&Wellesley Intersection 1,020,522 7,177 74,490 946,032 7.30% 259 North Sullivan ITS Project 0 353 1,618 (1,618) 0.00% 267 Mission SW-Bowdish to Union 11,310 0 0 11,310 0.00% 275 Barker Rd Widening-River to Euclid 1,132,320 9,779 1,097,136 35,184 96.89% 285 Indiana Ave Pres-Evergreen to Sullivan 7,210 0 0 7,210 0.00% 292 Mullen Preservation: Broadway-Mission 0 23,525 50,526 (50,526) 0.00% 293 2018 CSS Citywide Reflective Signal BP 74,250 146 7,380 66,870 9.94% 294 Citywide Reflective Post Panels 17,875 73 3,000 14,875 16.79% 299 Argonne Rd Concrete Pvmt Indiana to Mont 2,392,450 28,309 104,026 2,288,424 4.35% 300 Pines&Mission Intersection Improvements 498,000 7,445 20,633 477,367 4.14% 301 Park&Mission Intersection Improvements 693,000 9,727 20,323 672,677 2.93% 303 S.Conklin Road Sidewalk 0 0 162 (162) 0.00% 310 Sullivan Rd Overcrossing UP RR Deck Rep. 317,625 3,405 10,558 307,067 3.32% 313 Barker Road/Union Pacific Crossing 1,312,500 4,153 24,790 1,287,710 1.89% 318 Wilbur Sidewalk: Boone to Mission 50,000 377 15,013 34,987 30.03% 320 Sullivan Preservation:Sprague-8th 19,800 0 1,600 18,200 8.08% 321 Argonne Corridor Impry-North of Knox 0 0 756 (756) 0.00% 323 Evergreen Road Preservation 0 37,749 37,749 (37,749) 0.00% 326 2020 Citywide Retroreflective Post Panel 0 108 108 (108) 0.00% 329 Barker Road Imp-City Limits to Appleway 0 1,729 1,729 (1,729) 0.00% Contingency 1,000,000 0 0 1,000,000 0.00% Total expenditures 8,876,315 146,533 1,492,882 7,383,433 16.82% Revenues over(under)expenditures 0 167,464 (536,114) (15,302,980) Beginning fund balance 67,402 67,402 Ending fund balance 67,402 (468,712) Note: Work performed in the Street Capital Projects Fund for preservation projects is for items such as sidewalk upgrades that were bid with the pavement preservation work. Page 12 P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2021\2021 06 30 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA Budget Year 2021 Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures Elapsed= 50.00% For the Six-Month Period Ended June 30,2021 2021 Actual Actual through Budget %of Budget June June 30 Remaining Budget CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS-continued #309-PARKS CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND Revenues Grant Proceeds 525,260 0 27,909 (497,351) 5.31% Transfers in-#001 187,103 0 0 (187,103) 0.00% Transfers in-#312 718,008 0 2,033 (715,975) 0.28% Investment Interest 0 0 20 20 0.00% Total revenues 1,430,371 0 29,962 (1,400,409) 2.09% Expenditures 268 Appleway Trail-Evergreen to Sullivan 0 0 2,033 (2,033) 0.00% 304 CenterPlace West Lawn Phase 2 14,876 15,347 18,838 (3,962) 126.63% 305 CenterPlace Roof Repair 12,227 98 14,715 (2,488) 120.35% 314 Balfour Park Frontage Improvements 565,150 2,026 15,318 549,832 2.71% 315 Brown's Park 2020 Improvements 704,731 516,051 675,496 29,235 95.85% 316 Balfour Park Improvements-Phase 1 0 979 4,488 (4,488) 0.00% Install stage fill speakers Great Room 6,346 0 0 6,346 0.00% Repair failed pixels Great Room 6,505 0 0 6,505 0.00% Reprogram Great Room NV system 12,499 0 0 12,499 0.00% Repair/replace siding at Mirabeau restroom 30,000 0 0 30,000 0.00% 328 Sullivan Park Waterline 152,858 0 0 152,858 0.00% Total expenditures 1,505,192 534,501 730,889 774,303 48.56% Revenues over(under)expenditures (74,821) (534,501) (700,927) (2,174,711) Beginning fund balance 75,577 75,577 Ending fund balance 756 (625,349) #310-CIVIC FACILITIES CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND Revenues Investment Interest 3,100 43 285 (2,815) 9.20% Total revenues 3,100 43 285 (2,815) 9.20% Expenditures Transfers out-#312 0 0 0 0 0.00% Total expenditures 0 0 0 0 0.00% Revenues over(under)expenditures 3,100 43 285 (2,815) Beginning fund balance 842,964 842,964 Ending fund balance 846,064 843,250 Note: The fund balance includes$839,285.10 paid by the Library District for 2.82 acres at the Balfour Park site. If the District does not succeed in getting a voted bond approved by October 2017 then the City may repurchase this land at the original sale price of$839,285.10. Page 13 P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2021\2021 06 30 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA Budget Year 2021 Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures Elapsed= 50.00% For the Six-Month Period Ended June 30,2021 2021 Actual Actual through Budget %of Budget June June 30 Remaining Budget CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS-continued #311 -PAVEMENT PRESERVATION FUND Revenues Transfers in-#001 991,843 0 0 (991,843) 0.00% Transfers in-#106 1,500,000 0 0 (1,500,000) 0.00% Transfers in-#301 827,278 0 0 (827,278) 0.00% Transfers in-#302 827,279 0 0 (827,279) 0.00% Grant Proceeds 0 0 0 0 0.00% Investment Interest 0 293 1,684 1,684 0.00% Total revenues 4,146,400 293 1,684 (4,144,716) 0.04% Expenditures Pre-Project GeoTech Services 50,000 0 0 50,000 0.00% Pavement Preservation 4,676,350 0 0 4,676,350 0.00% 285 Indiana Ave Pres-Evergreen to Sullivan 0 0 8,129 (8,129) 0.00% 286 Broadway Preservation: Havana to Fancher 0 0 281 (281) 0.00% 292 Mullen Preservation: Broadway-Mission 0 2,447 15,398 (15,398) 0.00% 309 Local Access Streets: Barker Homes 0 336 (2,053) 2,053 0.00% 314 Balfour Park Frontage Improvements 0 4,385 6,600 (6,600) 0.00% 320 Sullivan Preservation:Sprague-8th 0 0 130 (130) 0.00% 323 Evergreen Road Preservation Project 0 29,856 56,977 (56,977) 0.00% 325 2021 Local Access Streets:South Park Rd 0 6,799 43,650 (43,650) 0.00% Total expenditures 4,726,350 43,824 129,111 4,597,239 2.73% Revenues over(under)expenditures (579,950) (43,531) (127,426) (8,741,955) Beginning fund balance 5,792,145 5,792,145 Ending fund balance 5,212,195 5,664,719 #312-CAPITAL RESERVE FUND Revenues Transfers in-#001 11,126,343 0 0 (11,126,343) 0.00% Transfers in-#310 0 0 0 0 0.00% Investment Interest 100,000 361 2,853 (97,147) 2.85% Proceeds from Sale of Land 0 0 109,403 109,403 0.00% Total revenues 11,226,343 361 112,256 (11,114,087) 1.00% Expenditures Transfers out-#303 0 0 249 (249) 0.00% Transfers out-#309 718,008 0 2,033 715,975 0.28% Transfers out-#314 725,774 0 22 725,752 0.00% Land Acquisition 2,659,600 1,579,827 1,583,327 1,076,273 59.53% Total expenditures 4,103,382 1,579,827 1,585,631 2,517,751 38.64% Revenues over(under)expenditures 7,122,961 (1,579,465) (1,473,375) (13,631,838) Beginning fund balance 8,503,764 8,503,764 Ending fund balance 15,626,725 7,030,389 Page 14 P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2021\2021 06 30 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA Budget Year 2021 Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures Elapsed= 50.00% For the Six-Month Period Ended June 30,2021 2021 Actual Actual through Budget %of Budget June June 30 Remaining Budget CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS-continued #314-RAILROAD GRADE SEPARATION PROJECTS FUND Revenues Grant Proceeds 11,508,819 0 310 (11,508,509) 0.00% Investment Interest 0 33 287 287 0.00% Leasehold Excise Tax 0 0 941 941 0.00% Transfers in-#302 1,127,387 0 0 (1,127,387) 0.00% Transfers in-#312 725,774 0 22 (725,752) 0.00% Miscellaneous Revenues 0 1,329 9,196 9,196 0.00% Total revenues 13,361,980 1,362 10,756 (13,351,224) 0.08% Expenditures 143 Barker Rd/BNSF Grade Separation 9,396,870 71,070 (123,103) 9,519,973 -1.31% 223 Pines Rd Underpass 4,149,450 55,478 250,485 3,898,965 6.04% 311 Sullivan Rd./SR 290 Interchange Project 250,000 17,133 84,386 165,614 33.75% Total expenditures 13,796,320 143,681 211,768 13,584,552 1.53% Revenues over(under)expenditures (434,340) (142,319) (201,012) (26,935,776) Beginning fund balance 793,526 793,526 Ending fund balance 359,186 592,514 #315-TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEES Revenues Transportation Impact Fees 0 0 107,034 107,034 0.00% Investment Interest 0 6 27 27 0.00% Total revenues 0 6 107,061 107,061 0.00% Expenditures Transfers out 0 0 0 0 0.00% Total expenditures 0 0 0 0 0.00% Revenues over(under)expenditures 0 6 107,061 107,061 Beginning fund balance 0 0 Ending fund balance 0 107,061 Page 15 P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2021\2021 06 30 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA Budget Year 2021 Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures Elapsed= 50.00% For the Six-Month Period Ended June 30,2021 2021 Actual Actual through Budget %of Budget June June 30 Remaining Budget ENTERPRISE FUNDS #402-STORMWATER FUND RECURRING ACTIVITY Revenues Stormwater Management Fees 1,900,000 285,809 970,884 (929,117) 51.10% Investment Interest 40,000 149 825 (39,175) 2.06% Miscellaneous Revenues 0 0 0 0 0.00% Total Recurring Revenues 1,940,000 285,959 971,709 (968,291) 50.09% Expenditures Wages/Benefits/Payroll Taxes 552,694 26,335 159,251 393,443 28.81% Supplies 14,750 1,401 5,723 9,027 38.80% Services&Charges 1,320,643 131,134 396,430 924,213 30.02% Intergovernmental Payments 45,000 0 0 45,000 0.00% Vehicle Rentals-#501 6,750 0 0 6,750 0.00% Total Recurring Expenditures 1,939,837 158,870 561,404 1,378,433 28.94% Recurring Revenues Over(Under) Recurring Expenditures 163 127,089 410,305 410,142 NONRECURRING ACTIVITY Revenues Grant Proceeds 100,000 0 0 (100,000) 0.00% Total Nonrecurring Revenues 100,000 0 0 (100,000) 0.00% Expenditures Capital-various projects 500,000 0 3,122 496,878 0.62% 300 Pines&Mission Intersection Improvement 0 0 468 (468) 0.00% 309 Local Access Streets: Barker Homes 0 0 1,373 (1,373) 0.00% 314 Balfour Park Frontage Improvements 0 338 538 (538) 0.00% Watershed Studies 100,000 8,889 8,889 91,111 8.89% Stormwater Comprehensive Plan 100,000 0 0 100,000 0.00% Total Nonrecurring Expenditures 700,000 9,227 14,391 685,609 2.06% Nonrecurring Revenues Over(Under) Nonrecurring Expenditures (600,000) (9,227) (14,391) 585,609 Excess(Deficit)of Total Revenues Over(Under)Total Expenditures (599,837) 117,862 395,914 995,751 Beginning working capital 2,159,796 2,159,796 Ending working capital 1,559,959 2,555,710 Note: Work performed in the Stormwater Fund for preservation projects is for storm water improvements that were bid with the pavement preservation work. #403-AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA Revenues Spokane County 460,000 239,829 239,829 (220,171) 52.14% Grant Proceeds 2,122,045 0 1,438 (2,120,607) 0.07% Investment Interest 15,000 97 670 (14,330) 4.47% Total revenues 2,597,045 239,926 241,937 (2,355,108) 9.32% Expenditures Capital-various projects 2,378,109 61,813 263,281 2,114,828 11.07% Total expenditures 2,378,109 61,813 263,281 2,114,828 11.07% Revenues over(under)expenditures 218,936 178,113 (21,344) (4,469,936) Beginning working capital 2,120,365 2,120,365 Ending working capital 2,339,301 2,099,021 Page 16 P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2021\2021 06 30 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA Budget Year 2021 Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures Elapsed= 50.00% For the Six-Month Period Ended June 30,2021 2021 Actual Actual through Budget %of Budget June June 30 Remaining Budget INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS #501 -ER&R FUND Revenues Interfund vehicle lease-#001 31,300 0 0 (31,300) 0.00% Interfund vehicle lease-#101 10,250 0 0 (10,250) 0.00% Interfund vehicle lease-#101 (plow replace) 60,500 0 0 (60,500) 0.00% Interfund vehicle lease-#402 6,750 0 0 (6,750) 0.00% Transfers in-#001 (CenterPlace kitchen reserve) 36,600 0 0 (36,600) 0.00% Investment Interest 10,000 71 463 (9,537) 4.63% Total revenues 155,400 71 463 (154,937) 0.30% Expenditures Wages/Benefits/Payroll Taxes 0 5,869 7,891 (7,891) 0.00% Small tools&minor equipment 10,000 0 0 10,000 0.00% Vehicle purchase 130,000 0 0 130,000 0.00% Total expenditures 140,000 5,869 7,891 132,109 5.64% Revenues over(under)expenditures 15,400 (5,798) (7,428) (287,046) Beginning working capital 1,387,962 1,387,962 Ending working capital 1,403,362 1,380,534 #502-RISK MANAGEMENT FUND Revenues Investment Interest 0 0 0 0 0.00% Transfers in-#001 425,000 0 0 (425,000) 0.00% Total revenues 425,000 0 0 (425,000) 0.00% Expenditures Auto&Property Insurance 425,000 0 365,384 59,616 85.97% Unemployment Claims 0 0 7,398 (7,398) 0.00% Total expenditures 425,000 0 372,782 52,218 87.71% Revenues over(under)expenditures 0 0 (372,782) (477,218) Beginning working capital 340,484 340,484 Ending working capital 340,484 (32,298) Page 17 P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2021\2021 06 30 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA Budget Year 2021 Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures Elapsed= 50.00% For the Six-Month Period Ended June 30,2021 2021 Actual Actual through Budget %of Budget June June 30 Remaining Budget FIDUCIARY FUNDS #632-PASSTHROUGH FEES&TAXES Revenues Passthrough Fees&Taxes 0 29,190 173,176 173,176 0.00% Total revenues 0 29,190 173,176 173,176 0.00% Expenditures Passthrough Fees&Taxes 0 2,200 145,257 (145,257) 0.00% Total expenditures 0 2,200 145,257 (145,257) 0.00% Revenues over(under)expenditures 0 26,990 27,919 318,433 Beginning working capital 313 313 Ending working capital 313 28,232 SUMMARY FOR ALL FUNDS Total of Revenues for all Funds 105,088,303 7,188,957 32,369,909 Per Revenue Status Report 105,088,303 7,188,957 32,369,909 Difference - - - Total of Expenditures for all Funds 113,185,114 6,233,472 27,127,426 Per Expenditure Status Report 113,185,114 6,233,472 27,127,426 Difference - - - Total Capital expenditures(included in total expenditures) 34,839,586 2,513,462 4,420,392 Page 18 P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2021\2021 06 30 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 7/13/2021 Investment Report For the Six-Month Period Ended June 30, 2021 NW Bank Banner Total LGIP" CD#2068 CD#9161 Investments Beginning $ 76,185,976.58 $ 3,078,658.52 $ 2,000,000.00 $ 81,264,635.10 Deposits 3,687,236.20 0.00 0.00 3,687,236.20 Withdrawls (2,500,000.00) 0.00 0.00 (2,500,000.00) Interest 4,714.18 0.00 0.00 4,714.18 Ending $ 77,377,926.96 $ 3,078,658.52 $ 2,000,000.00 $ 82,456,585.48 matures: 7/23/2021 12/9/2021 rate: 0.40% 0.40% Earnings Balance Current Period Year to date Budget 001 General Fund $ 46,481,168.94 $ 2,857.50 17,255.96 $ 500,000.00 101 Street Fund 163,544.90 9.96 123.04 4,000.00 103 Trails&Paths 20,729.30 1.26 7.79 200.00 104 Tourism Facilities Hotel/Motel 2,618,103.02 159.51 1,024.71 24,000.00 105 Hotel/Motel 821,832.37 50.07 299.37 6,000.00 106 Solid Waste Fund 1,137,514.85 69.30 492.86 12,000.00 107 PEG Fund 165,344.36 10.07 62.85 0.00 108 Affordable&Supportive Housing 174,143.66 10.61 65.86 0.00 120 CenterPlace Operating Reserve 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 121 Service Level Stabilization Reserve 5,500,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 122 Winter Weather Reserve 134,978.18 8.22 42.71 1,900.00 301 Capital Projects 2,529,586.86 154.11 977.30 25,000.00 302 Special Capital Projects 5,141,760.99 313.26 1,961.10 25,000.00 303 Street Capital Projects Fund 286,264.15 17.44 200.72 0.00 309 Parks Capital Project 0.00 0.00 19.66 0.00 310 Civic Buildings Capital Projects 710,995.24 43.32 285.29 3,100.00 311 Pavement Preservation 4,802,164.87 292.57 1,684.14 0.00 312 Capital Reserve Fund 5,927,748.41 361.14 2,852.73 100,000.00 313 City Hall Construction Fund 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 314 Railroad Grade Separation Projects 541,203.05 32.97 286.80 0.00 315 Transportation Impact Fees 90,269.73 5.50 27.10 0.00 402 Stormwater Management 2,451,822.24 149.38 825.24 40,000.00 403 Aquifer Protection Fund 1,588,938.15 96.80 669.81 15,000.00 501 Equipment Rental &Replacement 1,168,472.21 71.19 463.22 10,000.00 502 Risk Management 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 632 Passthrough Fees&Taxes 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $ 82,456,585.48 $ 4,714.18 $ 29,628.26 $ 766,200.00 "Local Government Investment Pool Page 19 P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2021\2021 06 30 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 7/13/2021 Sales Tax Receipts For the Six-Month Period Ended June 30, 2021 Month Difference Received 2020 2021 $ February 2,559,296.59 2,934,890.06 375,593.47 14.68% March 2,015,206.15 2,445,374.71 430,168.56 21.35% April 1,897,614.47 2,571,438.34 673,823.87 35.51% May 1,847,551.89 3,369,522.86 1,521,970.97 82.38% June 1,875,335.44 3,095,705.00 1,220,369.56 65.07% 10,195,004.54 14,416,930.97 4,221,926.43 41.41% July 2,570,769.98 August 2,677,467.88 September 2,682,700.17 October 2,540,248.50 November 2,731,249.99 December 2,602,181.93 January 2,451,245.65 28,450,868.64 14,416,930.97 Sales tax receipts reported here reflect remittances for general sales tax, criminal justice sales tax and public safety tax. The sales tax rate for retail sales transacted within the boundaries of the City of Spokane Valley is 8.9%. The tax that is paid by a purchaser at the point of sale is remitted by the vendor to the Washington State Department of Revenue who then remits the taxes back to the various agencies that have imposed the tax. The allocation of the total 8.9%tax rate to the agencies is as follows: - State of Washington 6.50% - City of Spokane Valley 0.85% - Spokane County 0.15% - Spokane Public Facilities District 0.10% * - Criminal Justice 0.10% - Public Safety 0.10% * 2.40% local tax - Juvenile Jail 0.10% * - Mental Health 0.10% * - Law Enforcement Communications 0.10% * - Spokane Transit Authority 0.80% * 8.90% * Indicates voter approved sales taxes In addition to the .85% reported above that the City receives, we also receive a portion of the Criminal Justice and Public Safety sales taxes. The distribution of those taxes is computed as follows: Criminal Justice: The tax is assessed county-wide and of the total collected, the State distributes 10%of the receipts to Spokane County, with the remainder allocated on a per capita basis to the County and the cities within the County. Public Safety: The tax is assessed county-wide and of the total collected, the State distributes 60%of the receipts to Spokane County, with the remainder allocated on a per capita basis to the cities within the County. Page 20 P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Tax Revenue\Sales Tax\2021\sales tax collections 2021 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA \ Sales Tax Collections- For the years 2012 through 2021 ,� 2020 to 2021 Difference 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 $ % January 1,589,887 1,671,269 1,677,887 1,732,299 1,863,225 1,992,273 2,078,412 2,240,908 2,253,852 2,615,326 361,474 16.04% February 1,009,389 1,133,347 1,170,640 1,197,323 1,316,682 1,369,740 1,536,252 1,648,657 1,776,898 2,185,876 408,978 23.02% March 1,067,733 1,148,486 1,201,991 1,235,252 1,378,300 1,389,644 1,564,282 1,549,275 1,687,355 2,317,671 630,316 37.36% April 1,277,621 1,358,834 1,448,539 1,462,096 1,640,913 1,737,933 1,926,551 1,955,470 1,627,596 3,029,090 1,401,494 86.11% May 1,174,962 1,320,449 1,400,956 1,373,710 1,566,178 1,564,119 1,762,119 1,946,112 1,651,937 2,768,743 1,116,806 67.61% Collected to date 6,119,592 6,632,385 6,900,013 7,000,680 7,765,298 8,053,709 8,867,616 9,340,422 8,997,638 12,916,706 3,919,068 43.56% June 1,290,976 1,389,802 1,462,558 1,693,461 1,641,642 1,751,936 1,871,077 2,067,987 2,291,842 0 July 1,302,706 1,424,243 1,545,052 1,718,428 1,776,653 1,935,028 2,053,961 2,232,342 2,368,495 0 August 1,299,678 1,465,563 1,575,371 1,684,700 1,746,371 1,877,899 1,980,940 2,121,051 2,393,597 0 September 1,383,123 1,466,148 1,552,736 1,563,950 1,816,923 1,946,689 2,019,198 2,223,576 2,258,489 0 October 1,358,533 1,439,321 1,594,503 1,618,821 1,822,998 1,898,067 2,005,836 2,134,985 2,431,920 0 November 1,349,580 1,362,021 1,426,254 1,487,624 1,652,181 1,768,817 1,925,817 2,064,504 2,317,685 0 December 1,323,189 1,408,134 1,383,596 1,441,904 1,664,983 1,856,989 1,918,411 2,019,895 2,178,815 0 Total Collections 15,427,377 16,587,617 17,440,083 18,209,568 19,887,049 21,089,134 22,642,856 24,204,762 25,238,481 12,916,706 Budget Estimate 14,210,000 15,250,000 16,990,000 17,628,400 18,480,500 19,852,100 20,881,900 22,917,000 21,784,000 25,200,000 Actual over(under)budg 1,217,377 1,337,617 450,083 581,168 1,406,549 1,237,034 1,760,956 1,287,762 3,454,481 (12,283,294) Total actual collections as a%of total budget 108.57% 108.77% 102.65% 103.30% 107.61% 106.23% 108.43% 105.62% 115.86% n/a %change in annual total collected 3.89% 7.52% 5.14% 4.41% 9.21% 6.04% 7.37% 6.90% 4.27% n/a %of budget collected through May 43.07% 43.49% 40.61% 39.71% 42.02% 40.57% 42.47% 40.76% 41.30% 51.26% %of actual total collected through May 39.67% 39.98% 39.56% 38.45% 39.05% 38.19% 39.16% 38.59% 35.65% n/a Chart Reflecting History of Collections through the Month of May May 14,000,000 •May 12,000,000 ■April ■March 10,000,000 ■February 8,000,000 ■January 6,000,000 I. ■ 4,000,000 2,000,000 0 . , . , . , 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Page 21 P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Tax Revenue\Lodging Tax\2021\105 hotel motel tax 2021 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 7/7/2021 Hotel/Motel Tax Receipts through- May Actual for the years 2012 through 202 pri 1 tMll'00 !`d 2020 to 2021 Difference 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 $ % January 21,442 24,185 25,425 27,092 31,887 27,210 28,752 31,865 36,203 26,006 (10,197) (28.17%) February 21,549 25,975 26,014 27,111 27,773 26,795 28,878 32,821 31,035 31,041 6 0.02% March 25,655 27,739 29,384 32,998 34,330 31,601 31,906 40,076 37,395 30,536 (6,859) (18.34%) April 52,130 40,979 48,246 50,455 52,551 52,242 57,664 59,117 24,959 44,476 19,517 78.20% May 37,478 40,560 41,123 44,283 50,230 50,112 51,777 53,596 16,906 49,002 32,096 189.85% Total Collections 158,255 159,438 170,191 181,939 196,771 187,960 198,977 217,475 146,498 181,061 34,563 23.59% June 43,971 47,850 52,618 56,975 55,060 60,637 62,048 73,721 28,910 0 July 52,819 56,157 61,514 61,809 65,007 69,337 71,865 84,628 41,836 0 August 57,229 63,816 70,384 72,697 73,700 76,972 79,368 91,637 49,772 0 September 64,299 70,794 76,100 74,051 70,305 80,173 79,661 97,531 59,116 0 October 43,699 43,836 45,604 49,880 55,660 56,631 61,826 77,932 50,844 0 November 39,301 42,542 39,600 42,376 46,393 47,090 52,868 59,252 39,694 0 December 30,432 34,238 33,256 41,510 33,478 37,180 40,363 41,675 26,573 0 Total Collections 490,004 518,672 549,267 581,237 596,374 615,980 646,976 743,851 443,243 181,061 Budget Estimate 430,000 490,000 530,000 550,000 580,000 580,000 580,000 600,000 346,000 346,000 Actual over(under)budg 60,004 28,672 19,267 31,237 16,374 35,980 66,976 143,851 97,243 (164,939) Total actual collections as a%of total budget 113.95% 105.85% 103.64% 105.68% 102.82% 106.20% 111.55% 123.98% 128.10% n/a %change in annual total collected 7.08% 5.85% 5.90% 5.82% 2.60% 3.29% 5.03% 14.97% (40.41%) n/a %of budget collected through 36.80% 32.54% 32.11% 33.08% 33.93% 32.41% 34.31% 36.25% 42.34% 52.33% %of actual total collected through May 32.30% 30.74% 30.99% 31.30% 32.99% 30.51% 30.75% 29.24% 33.05% n/a Chart Reflecting History of Collections through the Month of May May 250,000 200,000 ■May 150,000 ■April ■March 100,000 ■February ■January 50,000 0 , • 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Page 22 P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Tax Revenue\REET\2021\301 and 302 REET for 2021 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 7/7/2021 1st and 2nd 1/4% REET Collections through May Actual for the years 2012 through 2021 2020 to 2021 Difference 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 $ % January 46,359 56,898 61,192 96,141 104,446 153,661 239,437 120,809 212,512 277,311 64,799 30.49% February 56,115 155,226 67,049 103,508 83,583 124,514 146,892 199,209 242,927 283,644 40,717 16.76% March 71,730 72,172 81,724 165,868 220,637 282,724 310,562 193,913 203,774 497,974 294,200 144.38% April 86,537 90,377 105,448 236,521 205,654 169,060 218,842 347,528 197,928 470,817 272,889 137.87% May 111,627 116,165 198,870 165,748 192,806 202,734 646,397 263,171 258,784 380,347 121,563 46.97% Collected to date 372,367 490,838 514,282 767,786 807,128 932,693 1,562,130 1,124,630 1,115,925 1,910,093 794,168 71.17% June 124,976 139,112 106,676 347,421 284,897 248,768 277,424 465,044 329,801 0 July 101,049 128,921 208,199 217,375 248,899 449,654 302,941 327,636 234,040 0 August 106,517 117,150 172,536 202,525 231,200 472,420 261,626 300,312 365,838 0 September 63,517 174,070 152,323 179,849 178,046 187,348 259,492 335,824 381,224 0 October 238,095 117,806 123,505 128,833 253,038 207,895 584,792 225,216 381,163 0 November 104,886 78,324 172,227 129,870 186,434 229,800 263,115 319,161 370,449 0 December 74,300 75,429 117,682 157,919 164,180 278,995 288,912 235,726 479,586 0 Total distributed by Spokane County 1,185,707 1,321,650 1,567,429 2,131,578 2,353,822 3,007,573 3,800,432 3,333,549 3,658,026 1,910,093 Budget estimate 875,000 975,000 1,100,000 1,400,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 3,000,000 2,800,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 Actual over(under)budget 310,707 346,650 467,429 731,578 353,822 1,007,573 800,432 533,549 1,658,026 (89,907) Total actual collections as a%of total budget 135.51% 135.55% 142.49% 152.26% 117.69% 150.38% 126.68% 119.06% 182.90% n/a %change in annual total collected 23.22% 11.47% 18.60% 35.99% 10.43% 27.77% 26.36% (12.28%) 9.73% n/a %of budget collected through May 42.56% 50.34% 46.75% 54.84% 40.36% 46.63% 52.07% 40.17% 55.80% 95.50% %of actual total collected through May 31.40% 37.14% 32.81% 36.02% 34.29% 31.01% 41.10% 33.74% 30.51% n/a Chart Reflecting History of Collections through the Month of May May 2,500,000 •May •April 2,000,000 •March •February 1,500,000 ■January 1,000,000 500,000 ■ ■ ■ 0 , i i i , 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Page 23 P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Debt Capacity\2021\debt capacity 2021 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 3/22/2021 Debt Capacity 2020 Assessed Value for 2021 Property Taxes 11,553,065,482 Maximum Outstanding Remaining Debt as of Debt ok Capacity 12/31/2020 Capacity Utilized Voted(UTGO) 1.00%of assessed value 115,530,655 0 115,530,655 0.00% Nonvoted(LTGO) 1.50%of assessed value 173,295,982 11,120,000 162,175,982 6.42% Voted park 2.50%of assessed value 288,826,637 0 288,826,637 0.00% Voted utility 2.50%of assessed value 288,826,637 0 288,826,637 0.00% 866,479,911 11,120,000 855,359,911 1.28% 2014 LTGO Bonds Road& LTGO Bonds Period Street 2016 LTGO Grand Ending CenterPlace Improvements Total Bonds Total 12/1/2014 225,000 135,000 360,00 0 360,000 Bonds 12/1/2015 175,000 125,000 300,00 0 300,000 Repaid 12/1/2016 185,000 130,000 315,000 75,000 390,000 12/1/2017 190,000 130,000 320,000 150,000 470,000 12/1/2018 230,000 135,000 365,000 155,000 520,000 12/1/2019 255,000 140,000 395,000 160,000 555,000 12/1/2020 290,000 140,000 430,000 165,000 595,000 1,550,000 935,000 2,485,000 705,000 3,190,000 12/1/2021 320,000 145,000 465,000 170,000 635,000 12/1/2022 350,000 150,000 500,000 175,000 675,000 12/1/2023 390,000 155,000 545,000 180,000 725,000 12/1/2024 430,000 0 430,000 185,000 615,000 12/1/2025 465,000 0 465,000 195,000 660,000 12/1/2026 505,000 0 505,000 900,000 705,000 12/1/2027 395,000 0 395,000 "05,000 600,000 12/1/2028 300,000 0 300,000 15,000 515,000 12/1/2029 245,000 0 245,000 2'0,000 465,000 12/1/2030 225,000 0 225,000 2. ,000 450,000 Bonds 12/1/2031 180,000 0 180,000 23.,000 415,000 Remaining 12/1/2032 130,000 0 130,000 246,000 370,000 12/1/2033 165,000 0 165,000 250,000 415,000 12/1/2034 0 0 0 260,100 260,000 12/1/2035 0 0 0 270,600 270,000 12/1/2036 0 0 0 280,010 280,000 12/1/2037 0 0 0 290,060 290,000 12/1/2038 0 0 0 305,00' 305,000 12/1/2039 0 0 0 315,001 315,000 12/1/2040 0 0 0 330,000 330,000 12/1/2041 0 0 0 340,000 340,000 12/1/2042 0 0 0 355,000 355,000 12/1/2043 0 0 0 365,000 365,000 12/1/2044 0 0 0 375,000 375,000 12/1/2045 0 0 0 390,000 390,000 4,100,000 450,000 4,550,000 6,570,000 11,120,000 5,650,000 1,385,000 7,035,000 7,275,000 14,310,000 Page 24 P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Tax Revenue\MVFT\2021\motor vehicle fuel tax collections 2021 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 7/7/2021 Motor Fuel(Gas)Tax Collections- ,j For the years 2012 through 2021 I Vjj 2020 to 2021 Difference 2012 2013 2014 I 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 $ % January 159,607 146,145 152,906 152,598 163,918 150,654 162,359 148,530 152,686 143,576 (9,110) (5.97%) February 135,208 145,998 148,118 145,455 163,037 164,807 175,936 181,823 170,461 150,882 (19,579) (11.49%) March 144,297 135,695 131,247 140,999 145,537 138,205 139,826 131,009 146,280 117,784 (28,496) (19.48%) April 153,546 156,529 156,269 157,994 167,304 168,000 168,796 144,080 90,589 141,080 50,491 55.74% May 144,670 151,595 156,850 156,259 171,829 174,211 193,986 185,669 130,168 175,706 45,538 34.98% Collected to date 737,328 735,962 745,390 753,305 811,625 795,877 840,903 791,111 690,184 729,028 38,844 5.63% June 159,827 167,479 161,965 164,872 157,737 174,838 144,308 175,985 128,359 0 July 160,565 155,348 157,805 168,205 177,427 177,019 194,267 169,733 138,932 0 August 164,050 173,983 172,308 186,277 177,567 195,780 205,438 195,107 136,633 0 September 171,651 195,397 173,299 174,505 194,640 184,342 180,874 180,605 195,550 0 October 153,022 133,441 160,539 161,520 166,369 163,780 158,062 162,187 160,272 0 November 162,324 164,303 165,871 181,771 176,178 194,814 199,282 196,240 175,980 0 December 138,223 142,140 141,298 153,338 152,787 154,298 148,960 155,728 119,282 0 Total Collections 1,846,990 1,868,053 1,878,475 1,943,793 2,014,330 2,040,748 2,072,094 2,026,696 1,745,192 729,028 Budget Estimate 1,905,800 1,868,900 1,866,400 1,867,700 2,013,400 2,048,900 2,061,100 2,039,500 1,715,000 1,808,700 Actual over(under)budg (58,810) (847) 12,075 76,093 930 (8,152) 10,994 (12,804) 30,192 (1,079,672) Total actual collections as a%of total budget 96.91% 99.95% 100.65% 104.07% 100.05% 99.60% 100.53% 99.37% 101.76% n/a %change in annual total collected (0.58%) 1.14% 0.56% 3.48% 3.63% 1.31% 1.54% (2.19%) (13.89%) n/a %of budget collected through May 38.69% 39.38% 39.94% 40.33% 40.31% 38.84% 40.80% 38.79% 40.24% 40.31% %of actual total collected through May 39.92% 39.40% 39.68% 38.75% 40.29% 39.00% 40.58% 39.03% 39.55% n/a Chart Reflecting History of Collections through the Month of May May May 900,000 II April 800,000 - March 700,000 II February 6 00,000 January 500,000 400,000 300,000 100,000 100,000 0 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Page 25 P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Tax Revenue\Telephone Tax\2021\telephone utility tax collections 2021 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA Telephone Utility Tax Collections- For the years 2012 through 2021Mil 2020 to 2021 Difference 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 $ % January 193,818 217,478 210,777 177,948 182,167 162,734 130,196 136,615 123,292 7,399 (115,893) (94.00%) February 261,074 216,552 205,953 212,845 173,971 163,300 164,060 132,538 121,596 155,911 34,315 28.22% March 234,113 223,884 208,206 174,738 177,209 162,536 158,416 138,727 121,938 100,566 (21,372) (17.53%) April 229,565 214,618 206,038 214,431 171,770 157,285 146,519 126,455 120,016 83,108 (36,908) (30.75%) May 227,469 129,270 210,010 187,856 174,512 161,506 149,434 135,704 118,018 94,841 (23,177) (19.64%) Collected to date 1,146,039 1,001,802 1,040,984 967,818 879,629 807,361 748,625 670,039 604,860 441,825 (163,035) (26.95%) June 234,542 293,668 210,289 187,412 170,450 156,023 150,780 129,602 117,905 0 July 226,118 213,078 205,651 190,984 174,405 157,502 147,281 130,723 120,922 0 August 228,789 211,929 205,645 185,172 171,909 150,644 148,158 127,303 112,351 0 September 227,042 210,602 199,193 183,351 170,476 155,977 141,290 128,018 91,866 0 October 225,735 205,559 183,767 183,739 166,784 153,075 142,925 127,214 90,272 0 November 225,319 212,947 213,454 175,235 166,823 151,208 139,209 125,027 88,212 0 December 221,883 213,097 202,077 183,472 168,832 161,115 140,102 126,226 92,242 0 Total Collections 2,735,467 2,562,682 2,461,060 2,257,183 2,069,308 1,892,905 1,758,370 1,564,152 1,318,630 441,825 Budget Estimate 3,000,000 2,900,000 2,750,000 2,565,100 2,340,000 2,000,000 1,900,000 1,600,000 1,521,000 1,000,000 Actual over(under)budg (264,533) (337,318) (288,940) (307,917) (270,692) (107,095) (141,630) (35,848) (202,370) (558,175) Total actual collections as a%of total budget 91.18% 88.37% 89.49% 88.00% 88.43% 94.65% 92.55% 97.76% 86.69% n/a %change in annual total collected (8.24%) (6.32%) (3.97%) (8.28%) (8.32%) (8.52%) (7.11%) (11.05%) (15.70%) n/a %of budget collected through May 38.20% 34.54% 37.85% 37.73% 37.59% 40.37% 39.40% 41.88% 39.77% 44.18% %of actual total collected through May 41.90% 39.09% 42.30% 42.88% 42.51% 42.65% 42.57% 42.84% 45.87% n/a Chart Reflecting History of Collections through the Month of May May I May 1,400,000 •April 1,200,000 March 1,000,000 February 800,000 January 600,000 400,000 200,000 0 , 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Page 26 Spokane SECOND QUARTER REPORT APRIL-JUNE 2021 Valley°ti PARKS AND RECREATION ADMINISTRATION AND MAINTENANC CONTRACTS WORKED ON: • Staff in our department continued to work heavily with the public regarding COVID-19 restrictions and requirements, • Recreational Services for summer and helped them through the process of devising their sports camps own COVID-19 plans for their events. We also continued • Agreement for Services for the to participate in regular statewide and local Zoom CenterPlace Great Room Video Wal meetings regarding the restrictions and preparing for Repair reopening. On June 30, the Governor reopened our state, • Construction Agreement for the so we no longer require the COVID-19 plans, social CenterPlace Great Room Speakers distancing, or capacity restrictions for the type of events and Control System Programming we have at CenterPlace and the parks. • Amendment to Janitorial Services Agreement to include touchpoint • It was evident the public wanted to resume their cleaning and disinfection services at gatherings in the parks, especially for graduation parties. City Hall Our busiest months for taking park reservations are April, • Website Development Contract for May, and June. We made 154 reservations this quarter CenterPlace marketing website and this was only 10 fewer than in 2019, before COVID-19. We receive many phone calls and emails from the public We have been working with inquiring about our parks and reservations. • organizers of special events for three • With the public's increased enjoyment and use of the different car shows to be held in July, parks comes increased maintenance issues and repairs as August, and September. well. We have been quite busy trying to keep up with the Staff spent considerable time working extra maintenance, which includes vandalism, graffiti, • replacing aging and/or abused amenities, etc. on our department's preliminary 2022 budget plan and it was submitted. Manufacturing is still being affected from COVID-19, so it is taking longer to receive replacement parts. • We continue to meet monthly with the "homeless" huddle group. The • On the fun side, our department walked the geology tour group has grown and we appreciate of Mirabeau Point Park during a staff meeting, and learned the communication and efforts that new things, saw a snake, turtles, and two Mallard duck are being done. families on the rocks. • We are pleased to have hired our Park _ ' ;rt8 Ambassador to work weekends in the summer months. This position has ,' proven to be very useful as a direct hwe x ` t liaison with the citizens and being our "eyes and ears" out in the parks. 9 1 ADMINISTRATION AND MAINTENANCE, continued 4 r •�. r` �•�. . y;a c'w,,t,K le. .4 i .* 4 i .v.!' -_.' WO , ...„......,,, ,,, ,. _... , , <4,.. ,„„,„..„v. ,�``� �" 't�'. - � �`��. tj/ rrm�>� )°tom' � i v. ` �.i N. :'fir.. .w.,...,. ,: 4- � .' _,�� c. � } F 40gw�. a::4 •` ' • �— a ... t�i emu. '�\S�' �4e. . 41 hli ,., d jag n. � 1filiNIMIIM A THE NEW PLAYGROUND AT B . .-#' = : ..,. • Meetings throughout the quarter continued with the Public rvk Works team and the construction contractor for the Browns Park Playground, Small Shelter, and Restroom project. We are ;_ �,"``_ so excited to have this final phase completed and the Browns '_ „r� i`i ,;.-• ,,1••..,�,., �' x Park Master Plan come to fruition after seven years! We have war�g ; ��1l�!�i,llllll '' ' F received so many wonderful comments from the public, who ; -.d i ' 10 r- really love the amenities and appreciate the work that has been done. We look forward to the ribbon cutting ceremony r_ to be held on July 2! BROWNS PARK BEFORE • Several staff members meet monthly with Economic Development to discuss event planning and a.,.. promoting our facilities and programs. We are excited —vv�Nm f : Wm to be working together and with a consultant on ', �S 4+ 40 ,!"P�q. • a developing a new website for the CenterPlace �.s..w,. Pa r ' J. "' • `.�� Regional Event Center and the new West Lawn Plaza. Lim Eru:7F, >y''J' �`®� , wo ,w ° ' J�, ' • The Balfour Park final construction design effort is r o„ under way! We are thrilled to be working with Public �sl E - Works and our selected design team to get down to ., ,, x:: details on the fully integrated future library and park PaRKillakRY mmm m Conceptual Site Vian site. Next quarter we'll hold a community workshop and open house and should see a final project design v w by the final quarter of the year. a ' • Momentum continues to build towards the envisioned Spokane Valley River Loop Trail! Meetings have been held s Y with partner agencies and landowners and a key piece of the - - ` � puzzle has been approved for acquisition bythe CityCouncil _ p p q �� ,�r° that will provide improved public access to the south side of A ; the river and Centennial Trail at Flora—site of the future = r :.' suspension bridge at the east end of the envisioned loop Y '" .,. 4 $ trail e; x -,-, A. ii-I, r ` ; ram*.,`>4 2 CENTERPLACE REGIONAL EVENT CENTER ellik • CenterPlace booked 108 events ,yCEE�PIACF REGION"" this quarter. There are 365 events o w `EE. saoKA"e reserved for 2021 and 194 booked ° BEST IN for 2022. • it B2BAWARDS • CenterPlace received two Best in r�� 1, ; e ; : = i:` 41. Business to Business (B2B) Awards this year. The first was a .�� ` 0 1, + , ':, Silver for "Best Place to a Host Company Party." The second itlif _ . one was a Bronze for "Best Business Event Facility These awards are voted on by the readers of Bozzi Media's Spokane Coeur d'Alene Living Magazine. ` ',I • The Spokane Valley Farmers Market (SVFM) kicked off their 1.,` , .. 2021 season on June 4 with a food truck rally on the West , % -, - .�=-� 4i Lawn Plaza.The Greater Spokane Valley Chamber of Al �r Commerce was on site to perform the ribbon cutting. The ' r ,. -,,, ; ' __ `-- N SVFM has moved to the west side of the CenterPlace :tom, j`""" ARMERS parking lot and will continue the food truck rallies the first N.OUR �'"r Imo' Friday of each month. The SVFM has grown this year to ;r It 4 • The American Asian Pacific Islander (AAPI) Heritage Day was held on June 12 on the West Lawn. This was the first ever held in the Spokane Area. The event featured AAPI vendors, ® , ti- -•.._- artists and musicians, and was very well attended with over r.. d 1,500 attendees during the day. '' YM III 11,11,pi,'vi:.: . • For five days in June, the Spokane Valley Summer Theatre held two separate live performances on the new West Lawn Plaza. r a The July performances were cancelled due to extremely hot weather conditions, and with the COVID-19 restrictions being lifted, they now had the ability to perform indoors at ¢ University High School. `T ,„! .Et,;, :. • The Washington Festival and Event Association (WFEA) is starting an East Side Chapter.The Executive Director came to ' 'a Spokane to attend the first in-person meeting to kick off the s :m '` , ,� debut. It is a chance for promoters and businesses who support them to join together to talk about current issues : f. such as material and manpower shortages. Also,Jon Snyder -.- — with the Washington State Governors office zoomed in to give us an update on the State's reopening and how it affects our industry. .....i,iiiii 3 RECREATION AND AQUATICS !ell Our Recreation Coordinator, Tina Gregerson, attended the rilrill �;' ' " _ Virtual Washington Recreation and Parks Association ''' Annual Conference April 28-29. This is a great opportunity ;' to collaborate with WRPA professionals within the Parks '-' ® '�f and Recreation industry. N; f • With the start of the summer season, we interviewed, hired and trained recreation staff for our recreation 49/- programs. Eight Camp Counselors were hired to work in 4 our Summer Day Camp and our Free Summer Park ', Program and one Recreation Intern joined us for the 2021 season. -0 it,„ I > � • Summer DayCampreturned the week of June 28. Camps • ,;s,,to p fad.. ' iii ild .., A -# _.... _ filled quickly after registration began. Waitlists are �-� - available in case of cancelations. Each week 30 campers - (ages 6-11 years) attend weekly-themed camps located at toir_ If ) Terrace View Park. Themes include Hawaiian Vacation, ,y Western Week, Science Week and more. Following a amnia. 114 1.1 I Washington State guidelines, the campers were placed in pods of 15 campers for this revised outdoor adventure camp. _ \ -----.. SA e + • The free Summer Meal Program began at three of our Spokane Valley Parks. This to-go, curbside pickup program is located at Valley Mission, _, Terrace View and Edgecliff Parks. The meal program began June 21 and .t runs Mondays through Thursdays through Aug 19. Due to a great partnership with East Valley School District, we are able to offer free meals for all children 18 years and younger at these parks. \, w.. . ... ...iii#. W - MOM wry --�•- .�w.1 ww.. • Park Road Pool opened for the season June 19 ��,�lY OMB ,�t ��Aumffliff with Open Swim opportunities. With staffing limitations and pump replacements at Valley Mission and Terrace View Pools, Park Road Pool WWI continued with programming through June. - Limited swim lessons and swim team registrations filled quickly. 4 SPOKANE VALLEY SENIOR CENTER • Kendall May, Recreation Specialist, attended the ' 2021 WRPA Conference virtually in April. ,l i Air 1I I., • The Senior Center resumed five activities on a 10 `�4�� '�_ partial schedule beginning on June 1st. Activities Jl '< include: Bingo, Billiards, Knitting & Crochet, Quilting, and Wii Bowling. l. • An orientation was held to inform all volunteers %,j and activity leaders of new the COVID-19 1 procedures. 1 0 _ is ii • Participants did a wonderful job adapting to the �SA new procedures such as checking their �„_ , „ o- temperature upon arrival, pre-registering for activities, extra sanitization, wearing face coverings and social distancing. • The Senior Center is set to officially re-open in op-, early July. Many activities are expected to resume including ACT 2 art and exercise classes in the BINGO following months. rall • i I . Numbers That Count... Total Attendance 440 s. New Members 15 - - —� IMPI - i imt----111- II 1 If P"ya 1-_ I , ___ i' ., riii. --t, ,r, :- ) ,_.,:, intri-- 1 .. . , , 5 Dare Ellis Ozzie Knezovich Chief of Police Sheriff Spokane Valley Police Department Accredited Since 2011 Vali Services provided in partnership with the Spokane County Sheriff's Office and the Community, 'f Dedicated to Your Safety. TO: Mark Calhoun,City Manager FROM: Dave Ellis, Chief of Police DATE: July 15, 2021 RE: Monthly Report June 2021 ADMINISTRATIVE: Chief Ellis attended the monthly Joint Public Safety Leadership meeting in early June. Standing in for Sheriff Knezovich, Chief Ellis provided the opening remarks to the Marine Corps League at the Mirabeau Park Hotel in early June. He welcomed members from the Department of Washington, Marine Corps League for their annual convention. The Sheriff's Office had three lateral officers commissioned in mid-June. They include: William "Will" Goode is 30 years old and lives in Post Falls with his wife. He comes to our agency from the Post Falls Police Department(PFPD), where he has served as a Patrol Officer for the past 3 i/2 years. Prior to his employment with the PFPD, he worked for six years as a corrections officer in Southern Idaho and Missoula Montana. Adrian Hunter is 28 years old and grew up near Springdale, Washington. In 2017, he moved to South Carolina and worked as a corrections officer with the South Carolina Department of Corrections. In 2018, he was hired as a state trooper by the South Carolina Highway Patrol. Daryl Hansmann is 49 years old, married and a father of three. He was born and raised in Sonoma County, California, and moved to Washington State in 1997. He comes to us from the Snohomish County Sheriff's Office, where he has served as a deputy for 15 years. Prior to becoming a deputy with Snohomish County, he was a trooper with the Washington State Patrol for four years. Page 1 The Washington Association of Sheriffs and Police Chiefs (WASPC) held a virtual meeting in mid- June to discuss ideas for the proposed 2022 legislation, which Chief Ellis attended. Chief Ellis attended the monthly Spokane Regional Emergency Communications (SREC) Governing Board Regular meeting as well as the Joint Terrorism Task Force monthly meeting in mid-June. The month ended with the graduation of four new deputies from the Basic Law Enforcement Academy (Class 818) in Spokane. Chief Ellis enjoyed the opportunity to hand out the certificates to each of the graduates. SHERIFF'S COMMUNITY ORIENTED POLICING EFFORT (SCOPE): In the month of June, S.C.O.P.E. participated in: • S.C.O.P.E. Basic Training • Valleyfest Parade and Mirabeau Park • Radar Speed trailers being located Meetings throughout Spokane Valley on a regular • S.C.O.P.E. Volunteers deliver PPE basis by our volunteers. Citizens are really supplies weekly to medical, fire stations, appreciating S.C.O.P.E. and SV Police senior care facilities and others Department for providing this service. • S.C.O.P.E. Volunteers patrolling • Valleyfest Cycle Celebration Meeting neighborhoods and businesses June 2021 Volunteers Hours per Station *Includes estimated volunteer service hours that are provided in the City of Spokane Valley. These two locations cover both Spokane Valley and the unincorporated portion of the county. Location #Volunteers Admin Hours L.E. Hours Total Hours Central Valley 3 8 3.5 11.5 East Valley* 23 186.5 340.5 527 Edgecliff 6 43.5 0 43.5 Trentwood 4 63.5 56 119.5 University 13 263 60 323 West Valley* 17 364 36 400 TOTALS 66 928.5 496 1,424.5 Volunteer Value ($31.72 per hour) $45,185.14 for June 2021 The SCOPE Latent Fingerprint Team was given 35 cases for the month of June for latent prints; 21 of those cases were for incidents in Spokane Valley. Of the 21 cases in Spokane Valley, 5 vehicles were processed and printed where prints were found on 3 of those vehicles. The Latent Fingerprint Team currently has limited staff and is only open three days a week(Monday, Wednesday, and Friday by appointment). Page 2 SCOPE DISABLED PARKING ACTIVITY REPORT City of Spokane Valley # of # of Hrs. # of # of # of Non- Vol. Disabled Warnings Disabled Infractions Issued Infractions Issued Issued _ January 0 0 0 0 0 February 0 0 0 0 0 March 0 0 0 0 0 April 0 0 0 0 _ 0 May 0 0 0 0 0 June YTD Total 0 0 0 0 0 Spokane County, # of # of Hrs. # of # of # of Non- Vol. Disabled Warnings Disabled Infractions Issued Infractions Issued Issued January 0 0 0 0 0 February 0 0 0 0 0 March 3 6.5 0 9 0 April 0 0 0 0 0 May 0 0 0 0 0 June YTD Total 3 6.5 0 9 0 Abandoned Vehicles April2021 May 2021 June 2021 Tagged for Impounding 46 83 47 Cited/Towed 0 0 0 Hulks Processed 14 27 7 Total Vehicles Processed 146 200 i 136 Yearly Total of Vehicles Processed 504 704 840 Page 3 OPERATIONS: Suspect, Recklessly Driving a Stolen Vehicle, Attempts to Flee on Foot after Violently Crashing into an Unsuspecting Victim's Vehicle - Spokane Valley Deputies chased down a suspect who fled on foot from the scene of an injury collision where he violently crashed the stolen vehicle he was recklessly driving into a victim's vehicle. Spokane Valley Deputy Travis West quickly caught up to the suspect and safely took him into custody. The victim driver received medical attention at the scene for minor injuries. The suspect was transported to a hospital for further care. After he was medically cleared, he was transported and booked into the Spokane County Jail on numerous charges. In early June, at approximately 4:05 p.m., Spokane Valley Deputy Costello observed a reported stolen white Ford pickup driving west on Indiana approaching Pines. Deputy Costello activated his emergency lights and siren, signaling for the 19-year-old male driver to pull over as required. However,the male suspect immediately accelerated in a blatant attempt to flee. He continued west on Montgomery, driving over curbs and through the roundabout at a high rate of speed. Still driving recklessly without any regard for the safety of other drivers and pedestrians in the area, the suspect turned onto Jackson Road. Deputy Costello lost sight of the male driver, and search for the stolen truck began. Minutes later, Deputy Johnson noticed the stolen vehicle traveling east on Mansfield, and he began to pursue it. The male suspect passed other motorists and drove into opposing lanes of travel at a high rate of speed. Recognizing the increasing danger to other motorists/pedestrians in the area due to the suspect's reckless actions and complete lack of concern for everyone, including himself and pursuing deputies, Sergeant Hanson terminated the pursuit on Mansfield,west of Pines.Already in the area,Deputy West observed the suspect recklessly go through the intersection of Mansfield and Pines. The male suspect continued his dangerous behavior, almost causing a wreck in the intersection,before continuing east on Mansfield and out of sight without being pursued by deputies. With limited avenues of travel, deputies converged in the area. Moments later, Deputy West advised of a collision at Mansfield and Mirabeau Parkway involving the male suspect and a victim's vehicle. The Ford truck driven by the male suspect rolled after violently colliding with the unsuspecting victim's vehicle. Deputy West observed the suspect climb out of the destroyed, stolen truck and run away from the scene without even checking to see if the adult driver he hit was injured. Deputy West exited his fully-marked patrol car and ordered the male suspect to stop. The suspect looked back over his shoulder at the deputy, but ignored the lawful order and continued running. Deputy West gave chase, quickly closed the distance, and took the male suspect into custody. Initially, the suspect identified himself with a false name and date of birth. He was provided medical attention at the scene and was transported to the hospital for further evaluation. Other deputies at the scene contacted the victim and checked his condition. He was provided medical attention at the scene and, thankfully, only received minor injuries despite the extensive damage to both vehicles. Through the continued investigation,the suspect's true identity was learned. A check of his name showed an active misdemeanor warrant for his arrest. With additional information the suspect had used drugs earlier in the day and was possibly impaired, Deputy Costello was granted a search warrant to obtain a sample of the suspect's blood for testing. SIRT Team Volunteers assisted with traffic control while a portion of Mirabeau Parkway was closed to traffic for approximately two hours allowing for the safe removal of the destroyed vehicles, and evidence was documented/ collected. After being medically cleared, the male suspect was transported and booked into the Spokane County Jail for the following charges: Theft of a Motor Vehicle, Attempting to Elude a Law Enforcement Vehicle, Hit and Run-Injury, DUI, Making False Statements to Law Enforcement, Obstructing and his misdemeanor warrant. He remains in jail on a $25,000 bond. Page 4 Alert Deputy Recovers Stolen Vehicle, Passenger Also Arrested for Warrants - A Spokane County deputy traveling through an area of Spokane Valley stopped a reported stolen vehicle. The driver was arrested for possession of a stolen motor vehicle, and the passenger had four confirmed warrants for her arrest, ensuring both were booked into jail. In mid-June, at approximately 7:55 p.m., Deputy Catherine Horton noticed a silver Ford Explorer stopped at a traffic light. She checked the vehicle's license plate with Spokane Regional Emergency Communications (SREC) and learned the Explorer had been reported stolen. The stolen vehicle pulled into the parking lot of a convenience store located at Broadway and Park. While waiting for additional deputies to arrive and assist, Deputy Horton observed the Explorer leave the parking lot, turn east on Broadway, and quicldy turn around. Knowing assistance was close, Deputy Horton activated her emergency lights, signaling for the driver to pull over. The Ford turned north on Park and pulled over. With additional deputies now assisting at the stop, the driver and passenger were given commands. Both cooperated and followed commands, which led to them being taken into custody safely, without the use of physical force. The 26-year-old female passenger was informed of her rights, and she agreed to answer questions. She explained she had recently met the male driver and did not know his real name, saying she only knew him as `Monster.' When they were pulled over, the driver immediately apologized, telling her the vehicle was stolen. A check of her name showed four confirmed warrants for her arrest, one felony and three for misdemeanor charges. The 31-year-old male driver was advised of his rights and agreed to answer questions. He said he recently purchased the Explorer from a friend and did not have the title yet. He could not provide any proof of sale and denied saying anything to the female passenger about the car being stolen. Attempts to contact the registered owner were not successful, and the Explorer was impounded. The male suspect was transported and booked into the Spokane County Jail for Possession of a Stolen Motor Vehicle. He was arrested for the same charge by a Spokane Police Officer last February for possession of a different stolen vehicle and was released on his own recognizance.After his first appearance, the courts set his bond for both possession of stolen vehicle charges at $1,000. The female suspect was transported and booked into the Spokane County Jail for her warrants (Burglary 2"d Degree, Theft 3rd Degree and two counts of Driving While Suspended 3rd Degree). After her first appearance in court, she was released on her own recognizance. "Name Game" Unsuccessful for 8-Time Convicted Felon - A Spokane Valley deputy encountered a non-compliant passenger during a traffic stop. She wasn't wearing a seatbelt, failed to follow commands, and tried to use a fictitious name after she was arrested. At the jail, she was identified by corrections officers almost immediately. She was booked into jail for a felony warrant and new charges of Failure to Identify and Making False Statements. In mid- June, at approximately 9:30 p.m., Deputy Turner observed a black Honda with no license plates or working taillights on Broadway at I-90. When he caught up to the vehicle, he noticed neither the driver,nor the passenger,were wearing seatbelts.He activated his emergency lights to conduct a traffic stop as the vehicle pulled into the Rodeway Inn. Deputy Turner contacted the driver, who explained he was stopped earlier and provided several citations as proof When Deputy Turner asked the 42- year-old female passenger for a valid form of ID, she said she didn't have ID, When asked for her name, she became defensive, saying, "Why? I'm not driving?" Deputy Turner explained she was not wearing a seatbelt as required by law, and he needed to identify her. The female passenger insisted she was wearing a seatbelt and had just taken it off. Another request to provide her name was declined, Page 5 and she exited the vehicle stating she needed to leave due to a female issue. Deputy Turner told her to stop and that she was not free to leave. Again, she stated she did nothing wrong, she didn't need to provide her name, and she began to walk away. Deputy Turner told her she was being detained and was not free to leave. She then attempted to reach back inside the car and still would not follow instructions. Without knowing if she had access to weapons,was armed,or why she would not comply with simple orders, Deputy Turned took ahold of her arms and attempted to place them behind her back, telling her to stop. The female passenger continued to struggle despite commands to stop and warnings if she didn't,she would be arrested. With the female continuing to resist efforts to be placed in handcuffs, Deputy Turner used his radio to advise he needed emergency assistance. As he did,the female suspect attempted to use the opportunity of only being held by one hand to push away from the vehicle. Deputy Turner immediately grabbed her with his second hand and moved her to the ground, where her movements could be controlled. She was told she was under arrest. The female suspect replied, "What did I do? What did I do?" After being told she was under arrest, she complied and was placed in handcuffs. Deputy Turner looked over to check the driver who remained in the car with his hands on the steering wheel. He was told not to move, and he followed commands. Still, without backup, Deputy Turner noticed several people beginning to gather. He searched the suspect for weapons, got her off the ground, and secured her in the backseat of the patrol car. She was advised of her rights and agreed to answer questions. She said she still didn't understand what she did wrong,and the information was given to her again. She said she wasn't injured and verbally identified herself with a full name and date of birth making her 23-years-old, not 42. Suspicious, Deputy Turner asked her age, and she said 23 and even provided a home address in Alaska. A check of the information provided showed no valid ID history. Deputy Turner asked several more times, and she confirmed it three or four times. The female explained she hadn't been arrested in Spokane County and came down from Alaska on a ferry. She claimed to have an ID in her backpack,but the backpack was checked with her consent, and no ID was found. The driver stated he had just met the passenger, but told him her name was "Alicia." He was released from the scene. The female suspect was transported to the Spokane County Jail to be booked and fingerprinted. During the transport, she repeatedly asked if she could be cited and released, wanting Deputy Turner to use the information she had verbally provided. At the jail, booking officers immediately recognized the female as a frequent guest and had her correct name and date of birth within five minutes. A check of her name revealed a felony Washington State Department of Corrections warrant for Escape Community Custody (original charge Assault 3rd Degree). Further checks found she was linked with six aliases and six felony convictions in Washington (Assault 3`d, Taking Motor Vehicle without Permission 2❑d, Possession of a Stolen Vehicle, Theft of a Motor Vehicle (3-counts, Possession of a Controlled Substance-Conspiracy, and Trafficking Stolen Property). She was booked into jail for her felony warrant and her additional new charges of Failure to Identify and Making False Statements. Deputies Locate and Arrest Reckless Driver Reported by Citizen - On a Sunday night, Spokane Valley Deputies located and arrested a driver for reportedly driving recklessly. The suspect was found after a citizen reported a vehicle was spinning circles in the parking lot of Valley Mission Park and driving on Bowdish at high speeds. In mid-June, at approximately 9:15 p.m., Deputy Lederle was dispatched to a report of a reckless driver. A citizen reported a black Chevy SUV was recklessly spinning donuts in the parking lot of Valley Mission Park. The caller told the driver to stop before leaving, noting the driver appeared high or intoxicated. He also provided information the vehicle was now traveling south on Bowdish at 70+ mph. The caller provided an update that the Page 6 vehicle turned into a parking lot located in the 13400 block of E. 20th Avenue. Deputy Lederle and Deputy Korpi arrived at the parking lot a few minutes later. They observed a black Chevy Suburban with license plates provided by the caller that matched, except for one letter and a male matching the driver's description standing next to it. The deputies approached and contacted the 32-year-old male, who began to walk away from the SUV while holding a beer. The male suspect appeared intoxicated and became agitated, ordering the deputies to explain why they were on his property. It was explained they were investigating a report of a reckless driver, and the male began yelling profanities as he walked toward the passenger's side door of his vehicle. The male suspect was ordered to stop, and he complied. He was safely detained without further incident and advised of his rights. The suspect said he went to the park to "have some fun" and admitted to spinning "a few donuts." He said, "I will admit to what I did wrong." A check of the suspect's name revealed a misdemeanor warrant for Reckless Endangerment. He was transported and booked into the Spokane County Jail for Reckless Driving and his warrant. Murder Suspect Arrested at Balfour Park During Unlawful Camping Patrol - During an unlawful camping patrol contact at Balfour Park in Spokane Valley, Spokane Valley Deputy Branson Schmidt, newly assigned to the Spokane Valley Police Bike Patrol Unit, contacted multiple people lying underneath a homemade tent. One of the males was found to have a valid felony Murder 2nd Degree warrant for his arrest, stemming from an April 2021 Major Crimes Homicide Investigation. In late June, at approximately 4:15 p.m., Spokane Valley Deputy Schmidt contacted two males unlawfully camping underneath what appeared to be a homemade tent in Balfour Park, a violation of Spokane Valley Municipal Code 7.50.025. One of the males (27-year-old) was identified by name, and a check of his name revealed there was an active felony Murder 2nd Degree warrant for his arrest. When a second backup deputy arrived to assist,the suspect was arrested without incident. The second male was provided resource information and warned not to camp at the park before being released at the scene without charges. The murder warrant for this male suspect had just been entered into the system approximately 20 minutes before Deputy Schmidt contacted him. The male suspect was transported to the Public Safety Building to be interviewed by Major Crimes Detective Scott Bonney. Once at the Public Safety Building, the suspect attempted to run, but his attempt to escape was quickly foiled. After being advised of his rights, he declined to answer questions. The male suspect was booked into the Spokane County Jail for Murder 21111 Degree with his bond set at $1,000,000. Major Crimes Detective Bonney developed probable cause to obtain the murder warrant due to an investigation that began in April 2021, when 58-year-old Anthony Plumb was found deceased inside his motorhome in the 900 block of N. Felts. During the month's long and meticulous investigation, Detective Bonney developed the male suspect as a suspect in Plumb's murder through interviews of witnesses, cell phone data,tips from the public, and evidence located in a stolen Jeep where the male suspect was found in the driver's seat and arrested on May 12th. Additional evidence was collected with the assistance of Spokane County Sheriff's Office Forensic Technicians and Major Crimes Detective Dean Meyer. DNA samples were sent to the Washington State Crime Lab for testing and comparison. The results of those tests are pending. The date of this most recent arrest, Detective Bonney obtained a warrant for the suspect's arrest, charging him with Murder 2nd Degree. From Detective Bonney's investigation, the male suspect could also face Murder 1st Degree, Robbery 1st Degree, and Theft 1st Degree charges in the future. The Spokane Valley Police Bike Patrol was revived only a few short weeks ago after sitting idle for more than a decade. The Bike Patrol's objective is to improve safety in Spokane Valley Parks, the Appleway and Page 7 Centennial Trails, and other hard-to-patrol areas. Deputies on bikes can easily maneuver and patrol these areas allowing them to address criminal activity, unlawful camping, and other unwanted activity reported by people enjoying the Spokane Valley's beautiful parks and trails. Spokane Valley Launches New Program, Live-Streaming 911 Calls Directly to Deputies in the Field in Real-Time-The Spokane Valley Police Department has begun streaming live 911 emergency calls directly to deputies on patrol. With this new technology, deputies can now hear the actual words and voice of the person as they report information to the Spokane Regional Communications Center 911 Operator. The technology not only allows deputies to listen to the call, it immediately provides the caller's location on a map. This new technology called "Live911," developed by HigherGround, Inc., provides a "head start" to officers monitoring incoming 911 calls by eliminating inherent dispatching delays,thus reducing response times. Spokane Valley Police Chief David Ellis stated, "As the first agencies in the Pacific Northwest to utilize this technology, the Spokane Valley Police Department and the Spokane County Sheriff's Office are excited about the improved response times and increased situational awareness that Live911 offers. In just a limited test run of the Live911 program,we have already seen numerous success stories. We are excited to begin to roll this program out to all of our staff, and believe this will allow us to provide an even higher level of service to our community." Live911 closes the 911-time gap between police call-taker to First Responders by allowing officers to immediately hear incoming 911 emergency calls in their geographical area. Live911 allows the officer to obtain more information for a better response plan and increased de- escalation skills providing better service to the community. "With 24 years of experience in public safety, HigherGround takes pride in creating mission critical solutions that become game changers," said HigherGround President and CEO Terry Ryan. "Live911 will reduce response times, increase situational awareness for officers, and enhance their ability to resolve issues in the safest and most effective manner." Learn more at www.live911.com. Spokane County Sheriff's Marine Enforcement Unit and Washington State Parks Boating Program reminds boaters to stay safe as summer heats up. Hot,sunny weather is in the forecast for next week. The Spokane County Sheriff's Office, Marine Enforcement Unit, urges boaters to remain cautious on the water and always wear a lifejacket. Washington may have its warmest temperatures of the year thus far next week. According to the National Weather Service, temperatures statewide are rising into the 90's over the weekend, with some locations going over 100 degrees. Even though the air is warm, water in rivers and lakes remain cold from snowmen runoff. Most river and creek water temperatures range from the upper 30's to the mid-40's,temperatures that can easily cause cold water shock. Last year, Washington state ranked in the top five out of all 50 states in boating fatalities. According to the Washington State Parks Boating Program accident data, four people died in boating-related accidents, and two people are missing five of which occurred in the past few weeks. Two of the fatal accidents were on stand-up paddleboards (SUP). Small crafts like kayaks, canoes, and SUPs are the most vulnerable to capsizing. Sudden immersion in cold water makes it difficult, if not impossible, for people to keep their heads above water and stay afloat. Boating fatality statistics show that wearing a life jacket gives boaters and paddlers the best chance of survival in the event of an accident, especially in cold water. Participation in all water sports includes some risk. The hot weather and cold-water conditions underscore the need to always be prepared to deal with all circumstances. Page 8 Following are safety tips for boater and paddlers to consider as they head out on the water this weekend: • Hydrate. Drink water—a lot of it. • Eat something. Keep snacks handy to replace electrolytes and calories. • Apply sunscreen. Wear water-resistant sunscreen. Reapply it often. Consider wearing a hat and the color white to reflect sunlight. • Take a break—in the shade. Dehydration can sneak up on people. Get out of the sun and rest. • Eyes on the water. Don't be blinded by the sunlight—lookout for swimmers, other boaters and paddlers, water skiers, etc. • Always wear a life jacket. Accidents happen fast and .. without waning, even on a clear, sunny day. State law requires all vessels, including .A,T.E.D on the water? canoes, kayaks, and stand-up .9 Keep yourself and others safe! paddleboards, to have at least ' one properly fitted Coast Guard- t HYDRATE.Drink water —a lot of it. approved life jacket for each EAT SOMETHING.Keep snacks handy to replace person onboard. All children, electrolytes and calories. APPLY SUNSCREEN.Wear water-resistant sunscreen, age 12 and younger, are always 46- _ Reapply it often,Wear white to reflect sunlight. required to wear a life jacket. - TAKE A BREAK—in the shade.Dehydration can sneak • Always wear a leash. For stand- - - up on you.Get out of the sun and rest your body. up paddleboards, a leash is a EYES ON THE WATER.Don't be blinded by the sunlight —lookout for swimmers,water skiers,other boaters and necessity. Staying tethered to a paddlers. paddleboard provides extra DON YOUR LIFE JACKET.Accidents happen fast and flotation and a chance to stay without warning,even on a clear,sunny day.Always wear your life jacket. It can save your life. alive in an accident. A variety of For more information about safe boating,writ www.boatprepared.com leashes are available (coiled, hybrid, straight, quick release), and which one of these to use depends on the waterway. Paddlers need to research which leash is right for them. • Stay sober. Never use alcohol or drugs when boating or floating in a river. They impair important survival reflexes and decision-making skills. Also, be aware of any prescription medications that can affect balance. • Keep eyes on children. Children should never boat or float a river without the close supervision of an adult. • File a float plan. Boaters and paddlers are encouraged to study their route in advance. Before going out on the water, even for a brief time,people should always tell someone their plan (who, where, how long, etc.). • Avoid going out alone—friends and family are life savers. Page 9 Spokane County Deputy Earns National Certification as a Master Field Training Officer(FTO) -Spokane County Sheriff's Deputy,and Field Training Officer,Louis Acosta was ceremoniously awarded his Master Field Training Officer (FTO) Certification from the National Association of Field Training Officers (NAFTO)during the 2021 Nation Conference. A Field Training Officer is responsible for training, evaluating, and guiding new Deputies,from entry-level to lateral transfers, on safely and lawfully serving the citizens of Spokane County as a Deputy. The responsibility of being an FTO is one of the most critical positions for the Sheriff's Office. The training and guidance provided by an FTO lays the foundation of an entry- 1 � level Deputy's career and shapes lateral Deputy's past — experiences with the fundamental beliefs and policies of the Sheriff's Office. In mid-June, at the National Association of Field Training Officers 2021 National Conference hosted by the Spokane County Sheriff's } Office here in Spokane at Northern Quest, Deputy — ''" ' Louis Acosta received his Master Field Training Officer Certification. Deputy Acosta joined the ipsoa Sheriff's Office as an experienced lateral deputy in VAL>� 2014, bringing nine years of service at the Shoshone en/WANEr County Sheriff's Office and then the Post Falls Police Department. He was also a Spokane County Reserve Deputy and a North Central High School Graduate. As the FTO Program Supervisor, Lieutenant Justin Elliott, wrote, "When a deputy trainee is at a critical point in the FTO process, Deputy Acosta has been one of our"go-to"FTOs for specific training, problem-solving, and balanced training environments. Further, he regularly communicates with his platoon sergeants and FTO supervisors to ensure buy-in and a shared message for the expectations of the deputy,the unit, and the agency. Further,he regularly communicates with his platoon sergeants and FTO supervisors to ensure buy-in and a shared message for the expectations of the deputy,the unit and the agency." As a platoon supervisor, Sergeant Kiehn noted, "Deputy Acosta does not hesitate to help his platoon members and is a field resource to his fellow deputies and supervisors at times. Deputies having the opportunity to train with Deputy Acosta systematically exit his training car ahead of their peers." Sheriff Knezovich stated, "Since Deputy Acosta joined the Sheriff's Office, he has continually strived to be one of the best. His professionalism, knowledge, and calm demeanor, have guided his desire to serve our community with excellence. This, combined with his ability to teach and guide new deputies, is invaluable to the Sheriff's Office and the continued legacy of professional service we provide to the citizens of Spokane County." Please help us congratulate Deputy Louis Acosta for achieving his National Association of Field Training Officers, Master Field Training Officer Certification, and his continued dedication and service to our community. L 0 C K LOCK OBSERVE CARS SHOULD KEEP GARAGE ITEMS IN AND REPORT NEVER RUN DOORS CLOSED YOUR TRUNK UNATTENDED Page 10 We encourage residents who have operational surveillance cameras outside their home to go to the Sheriff's website and register their home and video cameras. Thank you. haps:l/www.spokanecounW.org/1080/Sheriff • ry_ r 0 dr .rr f O NW.Why 4+w WheMaA In VIP Video Identification Program CLICK HERE to voIu.utarIEy lf`ko the'Wit ai,r r..1 Page 11 SPOKANE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE .,t`"``` 'Sti Regional Intelligence Group 9 c � r 1BR Count by District f- Time Period:June 2021 R1c� `� Spokane Valley Districts Unincorporated Districts IBR Offense 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 OP FF LAH ML MW RF SPA WAV OTHER TOTAL 09A Murder/NonNegligent Manslaughter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 09B Negligent Manslaughter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 Kidnapping/Abduction 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 11A Rape-Forcible 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 6 113 Sodomy-Forcible 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11C Sex Assault With Object 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11D Fondling-Forcible 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 120 Robbery 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 6 13A Aggravated Assault 3 0 2 4 1 3 1 0 0 1 1 2 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 26 1313 Simple Assault 7 8 4 7 7 4 5 3 2 3 3 2 6 3 0 3 0 1 4 1 0 0 0 11 84 13C Intimidation 5 2 1 9 3 5 2 1 4 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 3 41 36A Incest 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 36B Rape-Statutory 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 64A Human Trafficking-Commercial Sex Acts 0 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 643 Human Trafficking-Involuntary Servitude 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 500 Violation of Protection Orders 5 1 0 3 1 7 1 3 0 0 2 0 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 35 Total Crimes Against Persons 21 13 8 25 13 21 9 8 6 6 7 5 22 4 0 6 0 1 6 3 0 0 0 21 205 200 Arson 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 210 Extortion/Blackmail 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 220 Burglary/Breaking&Entering 14 9 5 9 2 3 1 3 1 1 3 3 6 4 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 14 82 23A Theft-Pocket-Picking 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 2313 Theft-Purse Snatching 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 23C Theft-Shoplifting 42 8 6 13 1 4 1 0 0 0 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 80 2314 Theft From Building 3 7 3 6 9 6 1 0 1 1 2 1 3 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 49 23E Theft From Coin Operatied Machine 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23F Theft From Motor Vehicle 5 15 4 31 6 6 6 15 4 7 6 12 8 10 0 7 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 14 160 23G Theft of Motor Vehicle Parts/Accessories 2 3 0 7 0 3 7 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 3 32 23H Theft-All Other 13 13 11 6 4 12 6 6 5 2 8 12 8 4 0 2 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 23 137 240 Motor Vehicle Theft 6 1 3 9 3 3 3 1 1 0 4 0 1 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 43 250 Counterfeiting/Forgery 1 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 26A Fraud-False Pretense/Swindling 4 7 6 7 1 3 5 2 2 6 3 0 3 4 0 1 0 C 1 1 0 0 0 8 64 26B Fraud-Credit Card/ATM 6 6 0 7 1 6 1 1 0 2 2 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 3 41 26C Fraud-Impersonation 3 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 14 26D Welfare Fraud 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 26F Identity Theft 2 2 3 2 0 0 0 1 1 1 2 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 10 28 26G Hacking/Computer Invasion 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 1 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 1 11 SPOKANE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE „,COUNr,. Regional Intelligence Group 9 1 1BR Count by District i -iS; . -.1-.1,,,, Time Period:.June 2021 RIG_; 9 Spokane Valley Districts Unincorporated Districts IBR Offense 1 2 3 4 5 6 ' 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 DP FF LAH ML MW RF SPA WAV OTHER TOTAL 270 Embezzlement 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 280 Stolen Property Offense (Receiving,etc.) 4 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 11 290 Destruction/Vandalism 31 22 23 44 12 17 13 15 3 7 10 19 13 13 0 2 1 0 5 5 0 2 0 26 283 Total Crimes Against Property 137 99 68 143 40 63 47 46 25 30 46 51 54 44 0 16 1 0 16 11 3 2 0 113 1055 35A Drugs/Narcotics Violation 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 35B Drug Equipment Violation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 370 Pornography/Obscene Material 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 39A Betting/Wagering 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 39B Gambling-Operating Promoting Assisting 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 39C Gambling Equipment Violation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40A Prostitution 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C 40B Prostiution-Assisting/Promoting 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40C Purchasing Prostitution 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 510 Bribery 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 520 Weapon Law Violation 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 720 Animal Cruelty 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Crimes Against Society 2 1 1 1 2 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14 09C Justifiable Homicide 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 4 90A Bad Checks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9013 Curfew/Loitering 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 90C Disorderly Conduct 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 90D Driving Under Influence 4 8 8 3 4 2 0 1 2 0 0 2 0 0 D 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 5 41 90F Family Offense-NonViolent 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 90G Liquor Law Violation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 90H Peeping Tom 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 2 90l Trespass of Real Property 4 3 1 2 0 2 2 0 2 0 0 5 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 24 90Z AlI Other Offenses 14 6 3 11 4 6 3 0 4 1 2 3 2 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 28 91 Total Group B Offenses 26 18 12 21 8 10 5 1 8 1 2 10 3 3 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 34 166 NR Not Reportable 3 10 10 4 2 3 0 3 D 0 1 2 1 3 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 7 51 Total All Offenses 1189 141 99 194 65 97 I 62 58 40 37 57 68 80 57 0 24 1 1 25 15 3 2 0 176 I 1491 SPOKANE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE COUNt . Regional Intelligence Group 9 r- �r Burglary - Spokane Valley E° , ,,.„,,, r,„-. , -% . _ i Time Period: June 2021 $' ' RIG 9 90 I 80 70 Alik 60 )4 ter- 50klicipPe1041' 2017 40 H Algir� I 2018 fill.- —I-2019 30 I 2020 id 20 —)I(—2021 10 1 , I )1( )K )I( )1( ):. i L -5 ;E.- IO C v UJ QJ QJ N 3 iu 2 = a .o Q _. .n jai Q E r E U U- ao o co �„ z o 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 January 55 51 33 40 53 February 52 26 20 56 45 March 42 33 37 53 43 April 49 36 35 70 40 May 47 34 57 69 47 June _ 58 29 38 69 42 July 51 44 48 63 - August 56 51 57 58 - September 77 38 50 67 - October _ 37 48 46 68 - November 32 49 41 57 - December 34 47 40 63 - Grand Total 590 486 502 733 270 * IBR Offense: Burglary/Breaking&Entering 220 Produced:07/12/2021 SPOKANE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE ,,c.OuNrJ• Regional Intelligence Group 9 s r y Rape - Spokane Valley o -- �}FN Time Period: June 2021 !t[G q 16 I 14 12 10 —�2017 8 #2018 6 ��2019 Alt411*1 2020 4 a.— —*-2021 .4 . / - 1 1 I 1 QJ - tn. N N N W 1.1. 0- 0 (Li ,33 lit a 0 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 January 9 15 2 2 2 February 2 4 3 2 1 March 2 8 4 2 5 April 7 7 4 - 4 May 7 9 2 3 5 June 2 6 5 4 2 July 6 5 3 1 - August 4 3 5 2 - September 2 3 9 4 - October 7 1 4 - - November 1 7 2 3 - December 2 7 3 5 - Grand Total 51 75 46 28 19 *IBR Offense: Rape-Forcible 11A,Sodomy-Forcible 118,Sexual Assault with Object 11C Produced:07/12/2021 SPOKANE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE COUNT}.Regional Intelligence Group 9 0 , r"1 Assault - Spokane Valley r, , ' Time Period: June 2021 RIC; q 120 100 4V , f *i 80 ' 4111111'!� ;rl � OP f _ I.. -----sr.,r,< _•_2017 60 —;_n=-2018 *—2019 40 2020 — 2021 20 i i ' i LN L L L61C tp C T }VI o N 3 ( ' 3 NE t.L a- O U7 a z 0 v) 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 January 96 83 71 93 71 February 94 64 61 96 50 March 77 101 74 80 65 April 89 88 68 95 67 May 93 80 87 85 65 June 94 101 79 103 50 July 94 113 104 88 -- August 74 83 95 99 - September 92 82 72 79 - October 89 84 68 80 - November 85 78 85 73 - December 84 91 79 63 - Grand Total 1,061 1,048 943 1,034 368 * IBR Offense:Aggravated Assault 13A&Simple Assault 13B Produced:07/12/2021 SPOKANE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE COUNTY Regional Intelligence Group 9 } Robbery - Spokane Valley ° /, �, Time Period: June 2021 .a'F'2) , 14 12 j 10 1 8 +2017 4\ OA —zals 6 •Ilikiiilf iiiirStt 00" Ai 1 ; —*-2019 4 / IILVF * 2020 \\\ J ,� 2021 1 2 up o ii CL (3 o a 1.13 2017 2018 _ 2019 2020 2021 January 3 6 3 8 8 February 6 2 8 12 7 March 7 5 4 6 5 April 3 6 4 8 9 May 2 9 6 3 7 June 1 3 2 8 3 July 4 . 7 8 5^ August 1 6 11 6 - September 4 6 8 8 - October 4 5 7 6 - November 3 3 12 3 - December 1 4 10 5 - Grand Total 39 62 83 78 39 * 18R Offense: Robbery 120 Produced:07/12/2021 SPOKANE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE cnU rri. Regional Intelligence Group 9 O Motor Vehicle Theft - Spokane Valley 44 Time Period:June 2021 k,G q 50 45 1 40 35 ks, I `;' a 30 1 i y� �I, —*-2017 25Iiiier "��r 1 . --E—2018 20 —*-2019 15 2020 2021 10 I 5 i - I )i( )I( )I( )K )K .'- m c �' I v Cl) a) 'di 4C ro .fl <i u v L.L. a) z 0 yl 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 January 47 36 35 32 29 February 37 27 22 32 25 March 47 _ 27 20 31 25 April 42 26 30 29 23 May 27 25 34 29 27 June 28 24 25 33 25 July 43 40 32 25 - August 36 20 30 27 - September 43 27 37 27 - October 39 32 25 31 - November 33 45 36 29 - December 29 32 34 29 - Grand Total 451 361 , 360 354 154 * IBR Offense: Motor Vehicle Theft 240 Produced:07/12/2021 SPOKANE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE cOUN/} Regional Intelligence Group 9 4_% Theft From Motor Vehicle (Vehicle Prowl) - Spokane Valley Time Period: June 2021 �,` RIG � 160 140 120 100 1411/ jIIP r —2017 80 Y —II-2018 60 —A-2019 2020 40 2021 1 20 m z ci v, 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 January 99 75 51 66 87 February 104 33 44 98 106 March 94 77 73 58 75 April 130 62 122 75 86 May 79 71 140 85 68 June 107 67 84 80 67 July 97 107 114 77 - August 69 88 99 148 - September 118 85 80 130 - October 70 105 97 116 - November 52 112 96 90 - December 69 71 112 97 - Grand Total 1,088 953 1,112 1,120 489 * 18R Offense:Theft From Motor Vehicle 23F Produced:07/12/2021 SPOKANE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE cOU 1 s{i Regional Intelligence Group 9 O 446 Damage/Destruction/Vandalism (MALMS) - Spokane Valley r,a` ,,-.41 1 ,i Time Period: June 2021 RIG 9 200 1 180 160 r ii\\,... 1 ' 1 i ::: 41 \ , — 2017 100 ' „ 2018 80 —k-2019 60 2020 —#—2021 40 20 I L"' -6 2 - v m m m (13 (O L ❑. : 2. a .0 _0 _O r] C DE2EE tif alQ 4, 0 > u U- 0- o a w z 0 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 January 158 146 125 113 132 February 148 95 67 142 121 March 137 120 122 105 104 April 173 127 143 157 128 May 139 143 161 116 126 June 144 141 133 154 149 July 178 142 156 146 August 154 131 144 172 - September 159 156 142 190 - October 119 166 165 174 - November 131 155 141 151 - December 108 126 175 144 - Grand Total 1,748 1,648 1,674 1,764 760 IBR Offense: Destruction/Damage/Vandalism 290 Produced:07/12/2021 SPOKANE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE �`COUN/0, I Regional Intelligence Group 9 yS a 0_1 Homicide - Spokane Valley rti. i -� Time Period:June 2021 I �'f `' RIG 4 1 i I 1 X E3 1 I/ +2017 I - 2018 —*-2019 0 I 2020 ii \\I --w—2021 I1 0 u L ro ^ i I a4 r2 Q p cu v z o vi 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 January - - - - - February - - - 1 1 March - - - - 1 April - - - - 1 May - - - 1 - June - 1 - - - July 1 - - - - August - September - - - - - October - - - - - November 1 _ - - - - December - - 1 1 - Grand Total 2 1 1 3 3 *IBR Offense: Murder/Non-Negligent Manslaughter 09A Produced:07/12/2021 SPOKANE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE COUN4. Regional Intelligence Group 9 0 ..a. , f`�I ,� Identity Theft - Spokane Valley fI -� I —,I i6 Time Period: June 2021 REG q 500 450 400 350 300 —41-2017 250 -ra—2018 200 --*-2019 150 I 2020 —x—2021 100 1 50 L _ +-. U 0 co C _ , _9 D S3 S] 7 2 N Q ,� -' '--, to- al Q 0 > U LL N a 0 in 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 January 9 19 17 17 12 February 24 16 10 17 18 March 22 13 13 12 20 April 16 22 20 17 23 May 31 21 13 442 17 June 19 17 5 47 9 July 23 14 12 26 - August 12 15 8 28 - September 17 13 15 16 - October 15 21 17 18 - November 18 23 12 15 - December 24 16 7 17 - Grand Total 230 210 149 , 672 99 *IBR Offense: Identity Theft 26F Produced:07/12/2021 SPOKANE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE ,';,C,OU 4> Regional Intelligence Group 9 DUI - Spokane Valley Q "14 1 ^' Time Period: June 2021 RIG q 45 40 I 35 30 Ilk 25 >1---1 .,1 t , 1 lirlk / l -l--2018 �°`' T 2019 15 I et 1 �V! I 2020 10E-2021 5 i i 1 7. 7. — f- as �- to a a�3 au a) L So U O fD C 3 a _a . 0 co c -. 0 > U U a 0 v ai Z 0 en 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 January 22 19 32 26 21 February 25 18 22 28 24 March 32 39 22 8 15 April _ 19 14 27 17 18 May 19 32 18 15 20 June 28 23 24 27 29 July 26 17 25 25 - August 24 28 24 22 - September 20 37 37 22 - October 24 32 27 27 - November 18 28 31 21 - December 20 23 19 22 - Grand Total 277 310 308 260 127 * IBR Offense: DUI 90D Produced:07/12/2021 SPOKANE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE ,;,,c0UN71.. Regional Intelligence Group 9 ] Drugs - Spokane Valley ; i ., Time Period: June 2021 RIG 9 70 I 60 50 VII\ b. 4041",, -- 2017 u--•2018 30 I \ 4 4#1/fri • --A—.2019 20 2020 —Ni—2021 10 I I I 7 2 ' Q E 2O E f_ CO CU Q 4--' 0 > U u. 0- o N v z CI V) 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 January 23 39 51 45 31 February 28 38 40 62 36 March 28 58 57 51 4 April 38 55 63 36 2 May 23 39 39 64 4 June 21 54 29 51 1 July 17 55 46 38 - August 25 38 55 35 - September 25 33 49 39 October _ 21 50 47 37 - November 32 38 54 41 - December 27 47 44 30 - Grand Total 308 544 574 529 78 * IBR Offense: Drugs/Narcotics Violations 35A and Drug Equipment Violations 35B Prod u ceci:07/12/2021 SPOKANE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE 'a�couivr., Regional Intelligence Group 9 Fraud - Spokane Valley (;)° -), Time Period: June 2021 1 7 i - 120 100 80 1 I i I a rq r— 2017 , �2018 ,� ! "/ -*-2019 40 ---x- 2020 I —2021 20 I 1 , a V U) U) U) co co _ 2, aQ U mU CU D U u U U- ® O o Q v-� Z 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 January 26 69 63 _ 69 65 February 36 46 32 58 57 March 37 59 63 49 96 April 43 55 58 62 96 May 53 67 55 85 61 June 57 64 50 73 60 July 61 64 65 66 - August 54 64 65 70 - September 65 49 55 67 - October 65 60 75 76 - November 53 56 68 62 - December 42 60 49 61 - Grand Total 592 713 698 798 435 * IBR Offense: Pretenses/Swindling/Con Games 26A, Fraud-Credit Card/ATM 26B, and Fraud--False& Fraud-Impersonation 26C Produced:07/12/2021 SPOKANE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE couN - Regional Intelligence Group 9 I Forgery - Spokane Valley 2 'i `; IR Time Period: June 2021 RIG 9 30 25 N 20 , AdillikN i ,,,,, —4,-2017 IF 4/4 15 t`, I I h ii, \. -•-2018 —,4—2019 10 •— 2020 --*—2021 5 A )1( )K )I( M: ' a- -5 r• ar at a`) v `w Cl)'o Q a ar al+, U ti ,71 O co ea z 0 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 January 9 18 20 23 13 February 11 10 13 12 8 March 20 24 17 14 10 April 19 21 14 14 10 May 26 21 10 _ 10 10 June 15 15 14 7 6 July 21 15 10 9 - August 15 17 13 10 - September 20 14 12 3 - October 18 11 14 7 - November 9 21 21 9 - December 9 _ 13 15 15 - Grand Total 192 200 173 133 57 *IBR Offense:Counterfeiting/Forgery 250 Produced:07/12/2021 SPOI<ANE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE ., GOUNr},, Regional Intelligence Group 9 ' F CI NO Theft - Spokane Valley ai _' ; �,�' Time Period: June 2021 kici C) 300 1 250 200 )1,,' 1 ..ai- "--- - WI°. 4 .' Nillr l —F-2017 150 •r=7—2018 —iir 2019 100 I I 2020 —A-2021 50 1 1 u > a ua v W S L CL 2 2 tg - .n -2 m2 Q d QJ o Uii CU I.L. 00 O o 4/1 2 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 January 207 237 237 239 198 February 200 166 188 199 185 March 217 209 213 197 193 April 201 201 206 181 184 May 235 230 230 152 154 June 252 224 232 217 182 July 236 - 238 236 195 - August 223 211 256 168 - - September 212 194 233 218 - October 236 235 240 204 - _ November 218 198 205 219 - December 199 251 231 230 - Grand Total 2,636 2,594 2,707 2,419 1,096 * IBR Offense:Theft-Pocket-Picking 23A,Theft-Purse-Snatching 23B,Theft-Shoplifting 23C,Theft From Building 23D,Theft From Coin-Operated Machine 23E,Theft of Motor Vehicle Parts/Accessories 23G,and Theft-All Other 23H Produced:07/12/2021 �couN7'j 5: ` - �`' Spokane County Sheriff's Office _.,,,,? .!.. Response Times by Priority ,,4a. RIG S June 2021 Spokane Valley SCSO Unincorporated SCSO All Priority Create To Dispatch Dispatch To Arrive Create To Arrive Create To Dispatch Dispatch To Arrive Create To Arrive Create To Dispatch Dispatch To Arrive Create To Arrive 1 00:02:27 00:03:14 00:05:41 00:02:22 00:08:19 00:10:41 00:02:25 00:05:47 00:08:11 2 00:10:27 00:07:31 00:17:58 00:13:24 00:11:40 00:25:04 00:11:45 00:09:20 00:21:05 3 00:31:20 00:09:36 00:40:56 00:34:27 00:14:11 00:48:38 00:32:44 00:11:4D 00:44:23 4 01:07:52 00:07:35 01:15:27 00:22:59 00:07:38 00:30:37 00:47:45 00:07:36 00:55:21 Totals 0:23:01 0:08:39 0:31:40 0:25:19 0:12:59 0:38:18 0:24:02 0:10:35 0:34:37 Spokane Valley- Create to Dispatch Spokane Valley- Dispatch to Arrival by hour grouping by hour grouping 1:40:48 00:12:58 1:26:24 7 00:11:31 I n 00:10:05 1:12:00 0:57:36 L 00:07:12 � � c 0:43:12 = 00:05:46 g ., 00:04:19 xi 0:28:48 as 00:02:53 3 0;14:24 © 00101:26 0:00:00 oo:oo:oo 00:00- 04:00- 08:00- 12:00- 16:00- 20:00- 00:00- 04:00- 08:00- 12:00- 16:00- 20:00- 03:59 07:59 11:59 15:59 19:59 23:59 03:59 07:59 11:59 15:59 19:59 23:59 #Priority 1 0:00:00 0:00:00 0:02:46 0:00:00 0:02:13 0:03:17 Priority 1 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:04:36 00:00:00 00:01:42 00:02:38 Priority 2 0:12:05 0:08:55 0:09:51 0:11:36 0:13:33 0:06:47 -_:' Priority 2 00:05:26 00:05:30 00:08:46 00:09:26 00:07:40 00:06;16 .Priority3 0:24:17 0:26:09 0:27:24 0:42:04 0:38:13 0:15:58 —•—Priority 3 00:07:43 00:07:39 00:09:42 00:10:15 00:10:46 00:08:34 —.-Priority 4 0:00:00 0:00:00 1:30:24 0:51:47 1:26:34 0:46:35 —a—Priority 4 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:05:49 00:07:36 00:08:32 00:11:05 cOtATj. © -- 14 'S�jY Spokane County Sheriff's Office - ' Response Times by Priority ligt .pia.-- = 5: RIG e June 2021 SCSO Unincorporated- Create to Dispatch SCSO Unincorporated- Dispatch to Arrival by hour grouping by hour grouping 0:50:24 00:20:10 H 0:43:12 w 00:17:17 E 0:36:00 E 00:14:24 • - I 0:28:48I • 0:21:36 D:14:24 0:07:12 ilic 00:00:00 • 00:00- 04:00- 08:00- 12:00- 16:00- 20:00- 00:00- 04:00- 08:00- 12:00- 16:00- 20:00- 03:59 07:59 11:59 15:59 19:59 23:59 03:59 07:59 11;59 15:59 19:59 23:59 —4Prioirty 1 0:00:00 0:00:00 0:03:20 0:01:43 0:02:43 0:01:19 --0—Priority 1 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:10:23 00:01:38 00:13:54 00:01:48 — —Priority 2 0:05:50 0:08:53 0:10:08 0:15:00 0:21:16 0:12:02 =3—Priority 2 00:11:39 00:09:25 00:13:42 00:12:46 00:12:00 00:09:08 —0—Priority 3 0:17:23 0:29:26 0:31:19 0:38:05 0:46:36 0:22:55 — -Priority 3 00:12:19 00:14:01 00:13:54 00:13:46 00:17:15 00:11:11 — Priority 4 0:05:24 0:00:00 0:17:00 0:33:08 0:38:34 0:11:08 11..-Priority 4 00:13:03 00:00:00 00:14:45 00:07:03 00:11:14 00:05:10 SCSO All - Create to Dispatch SCSO All - Dispatch to Arrival by hour grouping by hour grouping 1:26:24 _ 00:17:17 1:12:00 ^ 00:14:24 tH E E 0:57:36 E 00:11:31 c 0:43:12 r 00:08:38 a 0:28:48 7 00:05:46 o 0:14:24 00:02:53 a• 0:00:00 O 00:00:00 • 00:00- 04:00- 08:00- 12:00- 15:00- 20:00- 00:00- 04:00- 08:00- 12:00- 16:00- 20:00- 03:59 07:59 11:59 15:59 19:59 23:59 03:59 07;59 11:59 15:59 19:59 23:59 . •Priority 1 0:00:00 0:00:00 0:02:17 0:01:43 0:02:33 0:02:37 Priority 1 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:06:32 00:01:38 00:09:50 00:02:21 --a—Priority 2 0:09:53 0:08:54 0:09:59 0:13:22 0:16:39 0:09:01 - Prioirty 2 00:08:02 00:07:18 00:10:45 00:11:10 00:09:24 00:07:29 — Priority 3 0:21:59 0:27:47 0:29:17 0:40:24 0:42:11 0:19:06 -4—Prioirty 3 00:09:15 00:10:48 00:11:43 00:11:44 00:13:50 00:09:45 —4—Prioirty4 0:05:24 0:00:00 1:10:23 0:42:54 1:10:34 0:26:53 --Prioirty4 00:13:03 00:00:00 00:08:15 00:07:20 00:09:26 00:07:48 SPOKANE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE ,,court .4, Regional Intelligence Group 9 Q A , I-1 % Call Activity Heat Maps - Spokane Valley � ; ,` ; I ` June 2021 -+4 lei Citizen Calls by Day of Week and Hour 1 IG c Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Total 0 21 13 13 19 14 15 17 112 1 17 14 9 12 10 16 22 100 2 11 13 9 10 8 17 18 86 3 11 10 12 14 9 9 9 74 4 8 6 9 10 7 9 7 56 5 3 10 12 10 10 10 2 57 6 12 14 17 23 14 14 14 108 7 5 19 20 21 9 14 9 97 8 22 20 38 33 25 28 21 187 9 20 24 49 40 31 34 15 213 10 29 31 43 33 36 37 40 249 11 38 39 47 44 41 38 29 276 12 30 39 44 37 27 44 18 239 13 30 40 48 60 33 38 34 283 14 32 32 43 53 40 33 40 273 15 32 37 63 51 39 37 37 296 16 30 42 48 66 31 37 36 290 17 33 38 47 57 59 43 33 310 18 37 46 35 45 41 41 43 288 19 34 21 43 51 35 39 45 268 20 30 45 47 43 40 41 47 293 21 32 29 39 47 29 41 41 258 22 32 41 33 26 34 28 39 233 23 26 22 27 21 9 26 30 161 Total 575 645 795 826 631 689 646 4807 Total Deputy Involved Incidents by Day of Week and Hour Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Total 0 27 9 14 27 21 32 24 154 1 11 13 8 15 13 23 11 94 2 8 7 7 10 11 12 11 66 3 9 8 12 12 9 8 8 66 4 5 5 8 10 7 6 4 45 5 1 9 14 12 10 7 2 55 6 7 21 21 29 22 10 18 128 7 4 26 40 29 32 17 5 153 8 18 23 I 51 40 34 26 10 202 9 17 27 45 32 31 33 17 202 10 21 25 41 32 43 27 32 221 11 25 27 38 34 42 41 24 231 12 18 25 35 28 31 35 20 192 13 15 28 37 45 27 21 28 201 14 19 16 34 41 32 26 35 203 15 22 25 42 34 27 23 28 201 16 21 26 27 35 19 28 21 177 17 19 21 27 31 31 30 19 178 18 20 21 22 27 29 24 32 175 19 20 11 30 34 24 26 28 173 20 22 32 35 34 26 29 37 215 21 17 18 30 34 21 32 29 181 22 23 37 30 24 26 27 23 190 23 19 19 32 28 24 19 22 163 Total 388 479 680 677 592 562 488 3866 Produced:07/12/2021 SPOKANE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE ,,,c,c�urveyd, Regional Intelligence Group 9y Citizen Call For Service (CFS) - Spokane Valley Q '4"':' ' Time Period: June 2021 ;' ", ' RIG 9 6,000 1 5,000 l 11111110111111 � \1�4,000 I J' , 4 _,r-,- 44dlilm I 2017 3,000 2018 -e-2019 I 2,000 2020 -*--2021 1,000 ' }� L L • 'di 0) ro ;' 0 fO 5 , .0 .0 .0 .0 ro 2 ¢ -� a�i o m m u_ - D o a) ©' z a V) 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 January 3,088 3,405 3,351 3,521 3,680 February _ 2,942 2,862 3,170 3,638 3,342 March 3,546 3,597 3,711 3,504 4,052 April 3,416 3,460 3,839 3,405 4,078 May 3,987 4,331 4,516 3,941 4,415 June 3,955 4,006 4,349 4,153 4,807 July 4,459 4,467 4,976 4,570 August 4,204 4,286 4,680 4,319 September 3,799 4,048 4,318 4,259 October 3,718 3,927 4,072 3,909 November 3,353 3,582 3,646 3,392 December 3,406 3,530 3,668 3,678 Grand Total 43,873 45,501 48,296 46,289 24,374 *excludes calls handled by Crime Check only Produced:07/12/2021 SPOKANE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE •,couNrP Regional Intelligence Group 9 I ,-1 Citizen CFS With Deputy Response - Spokane Valley ff ` ,i Time Period: June 2021 I �I Pi 9 3,500 3,000 2,500 '`'- 2,000 Y I +2017 -M-2018 1,500 -e-2019 l 4 2020 1,000 +2021 500 L v a v v v lri 7 7 f6 Q ' c o E E U- o_ o a) a) 2 a VI 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 January 1,941 2,208 2,189 2,319 2,295 February 1,787 1,865 2,011 2,364 2,072 March 2,224 2,375 2,386 2,321- 2,399 April 2,119 2,230 2,418 2,416 2,475 May 2,478 2,731 2,851 2,650 2,605 June 2,416 2,516 2,654 2,677 2,711 July 2,609 2,685 2,983 2,660 August 2,589 2,639 2,852 2,708 September 2,336 2,555 2,725 2,524 October 2,292 2,510 2,547 2,462 November 2,131 2,350 2,416 2,170 December 2,157 2,314 2,402 2,301 Grand Total 27,079 28,978 30,434 29,572 14,557 Produced.07/12/2021 SPOKANE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE .,. .,Cot-,N71,0 Regional Intelligence Group 9 04- i 1 `p 4 Citizen CFS Without Deputy Response - Spokane Valley L' } . Time Period:June 2021 !?rG 9 2,500 I 2,000 "Iii„,,0 1,500 ` .f` ' --.11111MV 1 'N.- -2017 - 1 f,f - --in-2018 1,000 ',`` -*-2019 2020 --ilE-2021 500 - I )1( )I( )I( )IC )K u 7 � e ai m ai a`i jg -g i b v ` � 0 > '- tL 0_ 0 0.1 W z Cl in 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 January 1,147 1,197 1,162 1,202 1,385 February 1,155 997 1,159 1,274 1,270 March 1,322 1,222 1,325 1,183 1,653 April 1,297 1,230 1,421 989 1,603 May 1,509 1,600 1,665 1,291 1,810 June 1,539 1,490 1,695 1,476 2,096 July 1,850 - 1,782 1,993 1,910 August 1,615 1,647 1,828 1,611 September 1,463 1,493 1,593 1,735 October 1,426 1,417 1,525 1,447 November 1,222 1,232 1,230 1,222 December 1,249 1,216 1,266 1,377 Grand Total 16,794 16,523 17,862 16,717 9,817 Produced:07/12/2021 SPOKANE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE • ,COUN7j,. Regional Intelligence Group 9 ' Deputy Initiated Incidents - Spokane Valley A° ;,,.,;.- .� Time Period: June 2021 RIG g 2,500 1 2,000 i 1,500 i -*-2017 YdV 1 i-2018 f 1,000 -A-2019 2020 I I -N -2021 I 500 >- v a 'd. a CD U L eL iti 7 Qi ) N U] it. -' E _0 5 Q -, E Ip Q ) t a) V Lid fl- > D.,a) z 0 V) 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 January 1,446 1,694 2,024 1,601 1,114 February 1,328 1,481 1,608 1,518 983 March 1,870 2,063 1,614 1,166 1,000 April 1,425 _ 1,683 1,650 1,172 997 May 1,553 1,789 1,157 1,567 1,003 June 1,503 1,699 1,724 1,070 1,155 July 1,504 1,793 1,600 1,036 August 1,737 1,637 1,565 1,130 September 1,671 1,773 1,779 1,285 October 1,560 1,595 1,472 1,239 November 1,732 1,841 1,487 1,164 December 1,574 1,661 1,436 1,208 Grand Total 18,903 20,709 19,116 15,156 6,252 Produced:07/12/2021 SPOKANE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE �.coU/Vr. $r Regional Intelligence Group 9 , ,- Total Deputy Involved Incidents - Spokane Valley ,k. Time Period: June 2021 R Jo 9 5,000 4,500 . 4,000 \ �;4..• �,i pry, V ��t 3,500 3,000 r -+-2017 2,500 -A-2018 2,000 1 --2019 1,500 :: 2020 I ? -IF 2021 1,000 1 500 y- L L L cil L `° ¢ E o E E 2 Q at 7 u u_ - 0 o a) a z a 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 January 3,387 3,902 4,213 3,920 3,409 February 3,115 3,346 3,619 3,882 3,055 March 4,094 4,438 4,000 3,487 3,399 April 3,544 3,913 4,068 3,588 3,472 May 4,031 4,520 4,008 4,217 3,608 June 3,919 4,215 4,378 3,747 3,866 July 4,113 4,478 4,583 3,696 August 4,326 4,276 4,417 3,838 September 4,007 4,328 4,504 3,809 October 3,852 4,105 4,019 3,701 November 3,863 4,191 3,903 3,334 December 3,731 3,975 3,838 3,509 Grand Total 45,982 49,687 49,550 44,728 20,809 Produced:07/12/2021 SPOT<ANE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE coUNr ir, .ri, r Regional Intelligence Group 9 Crime Check Call For Service (CFS) - Spokane Valley �',� Time Period: June 2021 RIG q 1,200 1,000 800 Jaiwoollilt011111111111k- -"andimi,„„.._ 44.4".- 2017 600 —M—2018 —A-2019 400 --.4 2020 —)K-2021 200 i i I .L r, c A A N Ql 4l co - Q d U U L Q- Q a V., in z n 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 January 612 662 631 627 622 February __ 608 488 504 w 689 __ _ 659 March 647 659 651 690 760 April 667 602 703 684 739 May 699 697 763 1,113 767 June 698 703 630 _ 793 739 July 712 727 717 782 August 690 673 731 837 September 667 626 655 812 October 667 713 747 735 November 571 661 615 643 _ December 635 609 683 668 Grand Total 7,873 7,820 8,030 9,073 4,286 Produced:07/12/2021 SPOKANE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE �cOUNt4. J. Regional Intelligence Group 9 Ticket Counts E el"rit1:4__. '''''. Date Range: June 2021 `A RIG Spokane Valley Districts Unincorporated Districts Ali Districts Ticket Type Ticket Count Charges Count Ticket Count Charges Count Ticket Count Charges Count Criminal Non Traffic 46 54 57 64 103 118 Criminal Traffic 41 45 47 57 88 102 Infraction Non Traffic 1 1 3 3 4 4 Infraction Traffic 225 304 462 577 687 881 Parking 0 0 0 0 0 0 Totals: 313 404 569 701 882 1105 l Deer Park Medical Lake Millwood Ticket Type Ticket Count Charges Count Ticket Count Charges Count Ticket Count Charges Count Criminal Non Traffic 2 2 0 0 0 0 Criminal Traffic 2 2 1 2 2 2 Infraction Non Traffic 0 0 0 0 0 0 Infraction Traffic 2 2 3 2 2 4 Parking 0 0 0 0 0 0 Totals: I 6 6 I 4 4 I 4 6 Produced: 07/12/2021 SPOKANE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE AI- OD -pp Regional Intelligence Group 9 0 ' Ticket Charge Details - Spokane Valley } Date Range: June 2021 RIG Charge Count 26,50.110.1: ORDER, PROTECT VIO DV 2 46,12.650.7: FAIL TO TRANSFER TITLE W/I 45 DAYS 1 46.16A.030.2: OPER VEH W/O CRNT/PRPR REG&PLATE 3 46.16A.030.4: FAIL TO INITIALLY REGISTER VEHICLE 2 46.16A.030.5.L: FL RENEW EXPIRED REG<=2 MTHS 3 46.16A.030.5,0: FL RENEW EXPIRED REG>2 MTHS 9 46.16A.200.7A: DISPLAY PLATE NOT ISSUED BY DOL 1 46.20.005: DRIVING WITHOUT A LICENSE 10 46.20.015: NO VALID OPERATORS LICENSE-2D 19 46.20.041: OPERATING A MOTOR VEHICLE IN VIOLATION OF LICENSE RESTRICTION 1 46.20.342.1B: DWLS 2ND DEGREE 1 46.20.500: CYCLE(OPERATE W/O ENDORSEMENT) 1 46.20.740; MV IGNITION INTERLOCK DRIVE VEH WO 3 46.30.020: LIABILITY INSURANCE VIOLATION 52 46,32.060: OPERATE-MOVE VEH W-DEFECT EQUIP 1 46.37.020: LAMPS, OPERATE VEH WO HEADLGHT WHEN REQ 1 46.37,040: LAMPS, HEADLAMPS REQ 1 46.37.050: DEFECTIVE LIGHTS 1 46.37.150: LAMPS, LIGHTING VIO COLOR-LOCATION, PARK-STOP 1 46.37.200: LAMPS, DEFECT TURN SIGNALS-STOP LAMPS 1 46.37.390.1.1: DEFECTIVE EXHAUST 1ST OFFENSE 1 46.37.685.1A: DISPLAY NON-MATCH LICENSE PLATE 1 46,52.010.2: HIT/RUN UNATTENDED PROPERTY 3 46.52.020: OLD CODE:VEH(HIT/RUN PERSON AT 3 46,61.020.1: VEH OPR-REFUSE COMPLY POLICE 1 46.61.021: FAIL TO OBEY POLICE 1 46.61.050: DISREGARD TRAFFIC SIGNAL SIGN 5 46.61.055: FAIL TO OBEY TRAFFIC CONTROL LEGEND 4 46,61.115: PASS, IMPROPER ON RIGHT SIDE 1 46.61.140: IMPROPER LANE USAGE 3 46.61.145.1: FOLLOW VEHICLE TOO CLOSELY 6 46.61.180.1: FAIL TO YIELD TO VEHICLE APPROACHING INTERSECTION 2 46.61.185.1: FAIL YIELD LEFT TURN MOTOR VEHICLE 2 46.61.190,2: FAIL STOP AT STOP SIGN/INTERSECTION 5 46.61.190,3: FAIL YIELD AT YIELD SIGN/INTERSECTION 1 46.61.205.1: FAIL YIELD PRIVATE RD MOTOR VEHICLE 1 46.61.290.3C: TURN LANE, IMPROPER USE CENTER 1 46.61.290; TURN, PROHIBIT-IMPROPER 1 46.61.305.1: SIGNALS REQUIRED-SAFETY 2 46.61.305.2: IMPROPER LANE CHANGE(100 FT NOTICE) 1 46.61.305: FAIL TO SIGNAL STOP-TURN UNSAFE LANE 1 46.61.400.05U: SPEED 5 OVER(40 OR UNDER) 13 46.61.400.1: SPEEDING TOO FAST FOR CONDITIONS 1 46.61.400.10U: SPEED 10 OVER(40 OR UNDER) 2 46.61.400,11U: SPEED 11 OVER(40 OR UNDER) 17 46,61.400.12U: SPEED 12 OVER(40 OR UNDER) 25 46.61.400.13U: SPEED 13 OVER(40 OR UNDER) 16 46.61,400.14U: SPEED 14 OVER(40 OR UNDER) 14 46.61.400.15U: SPEED 15 OVER(40 OR UNDER) 25 46.61.400.16U: SPEED 16 OVER(40 OR UNDER) 3 46.61.400.17U; SPEED 17 OVER(40 OR UNDER) 12 46.61.400.18U: SPEED 18 OVER(40 OR UNDER) 6 Produced:7/12/2021 SPOKANE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICEAte r Regional Intelligence Group 9 Ticket Charge Details - Spokane Valley N Date Range: June 2021 Charge Count 46.61.400.19U: SPEED 19 OVER(40 OR UNDER) 1 46.61.400.20U: SPEED 20 OVER(40 OR UNDER) 3 46.61.400.21U: SPEED 21 OVER(40 OR UNDER) 3 46,61.400.22U: SPEED 22 OVER(40 OR UNDER) 1 46.61.400.23U: SPEED 23 OVER(40 OR UNDER) 2 46.61.400.26U: SPEED 26 OVER(40 OR UNDER) 1 46,61.400.29U: SPEED 29 OVER(40 OR UNDER) 2 46.61.400.37U: SPEED 37 OVER(40 OR UNDER) 1 46.61.500: RECKLESS DRIVING 1 46.61.502: OLD CODE:VEH(DWUIL/DRUG}NEW 17 46.61.504: OLD CODE:VEH(PHY/UNIL/DRUG)NEW 1 46.61.525: NEGLIGENT DRIVING 2 DEGREE 1 46.61,530: STREET RACING-replaced/now included in:46.61.500 RECKLESS DRIVING 3 46.61.670: VEH DRIVE WITH WHEELS OFF ROADWAY 2 46.61.672.1: PER ELECTRONIC DEVICE WHILE DRIVING 11 46.61,673: DRIVE DANGEROUSLY DISTRACTED 1 46.61.687: FAIL TO USE CHILD RESTRAINTS 3 46.61.688: FAIL TO WEAR SAFETY BELT 3 70.155.080: TOBACCO(MINOR IN POSS) 1 9,41,250: WEAPONS VIO, POSS DANGEROUS WEAPON [POSSESS] 1 9A,36.041.2: ASSAULT 4TH DEGREE 11 9A.36.050: RECK ENDANGER 3 9A,36.150: DV INTER WITH REPORTING 1 9A,46.020.1: HARASSMENT 1 9A.48.090.1A: MALICIOUS MISCHIEF-3D 1 9A.48.090: MALICIOUS MISCHIEF-3 6 9A,52.070: TRESPASS 1 1 9A.52.080: TRESPASS 2 2 9A.56.050: OLD CODE:THEFT-3D 15 9A.76,020: OBSTRUCT LE OFF 1 9A.76.040: OBSTRUCT GOVT-RESISTING ARREST 2 9A.76.175: OBSTRUCT GOUT-MAKING FALSE OR MISLEADING STATEMENT TO PUBLIC SERVANT 7 Grand Total 404 Produced:7/12/2021 SPOKANE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE couNrj. Regional Intelligence Group 9 yS sf Criminal Ticket Counts - Spokane Valley 05 64. Time Period: June 2021 RIC; q 250 200 \ , i A :4 � 1 150 , � ,-� v +2017 E I € 2018 100 —3k—2019 —*-•2020 2021 50 l I I L _ — v S St Q 2 a 03 J� Q v U CD CU U- o- Q > U) v z ca Lel 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 January 152 176 207 173 124 February 140 130 174 185 129 March 165 195 172 140 117 April 103 149 171 153 116 May 116 175 132 154 85 June 149 179 186 171 87 July 165 184 172 130 August 147 147 168 153 September 125 169 174 162 October 164 178 176 175 November 163 157 169 130 December 148 188 168 133 Grand Total 1,737 2,027 2,069 1,859 658 *Ticket type of Criminal Non Traffic& Criminal Traffic Produced:07/12/2021 SPOKANE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE .coUNrk Regional Intelligence Group 9 �r� Non - Criminal Ticket Counts - Spokane Valley o �, Time Period: June 2021 -k. 1, R]G 9 600 I 1 500 i 4 400 bilii‘opp, N.146,..k+ -4—2017 300 2D18 —:--2019 � �+r 2021 U 'E , C t�i' Ql al al UJ co tt3 iU L f.L , � ..O -Ca .Ll Q - a ro .a Q Ql U u 8 4' Lid 0- O co a.) O if i 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 ^January 398 367 357 198 195 February 238 338 261 268 173 March 422 472 226 133 166 April 110 219 299 111 193 May 241 385 130 164 166 June 380 489 421 127 226 July 295 499 359 217 August _ 357 257 297 204 September 461 480 306 205 October 365 387 272 140 November — 330 366 253 195 December 274 254 253 239 Grand Total 3,871 4,513 3,434 2,201 1,119 *Ticket Type of Infraction Non Traffic& Infraction Traffic Produced:07/12/2021 SPOT<ANE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE `COUNtj. Regional Intelligence Group 9 ` `�'f` All Ticket Counts - Spokane Valley rI Time Period:June 2021 4; jf I G q 800 I , , I 700 600 i 500 1 , ,„ Or1411/441111N �-2017 400 11‘ibliiill -#2018 300 19. .. • sir-2019 2020 200 -NE-2021 100 I ' s _ - 2 -. w as w m a`' LL O Ql Z C1 in 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 January 550 543 564 371 319 February 378 468 435 453 302 March 587 667 398 273 283 April 213 368 470 264 309 May 357 560 262 318 251 June 529 668 607 298 313 July 460 683 531 347 August 504 404 465 357 September 586 649 480 1 367 October 529 565 448 315 November 493 523 422 325 December 422 442 421 372 Grand Total 5,608 6,540 5,503 4,060 1,777 *All ticket types except parking Produced:07/12/2021