2022, 03-15 Study SessionAGENDA
SPOKANE VALLEY CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING
STUDY SESSION
Tuesday, March 15, 2022 6:00 p.m.
Remotely via ZOOM Meeting and
In Person at 10210 E Sprague Avenue
Council Requests Please Silence Your Cell Phones During Council Meeting
NOTE: In response to Governor Inslee's announcement reopening Washington under the "Washington Ready" plan,
members of the public may attend Spokane Valley Council meetings in -person at City Hall at the address provided
above, or via Zoom at the link below. Members of the public will be allowed to comment in -person or via Zoom as
described below. Public comments will only be accepted for those items noted on the agenda as "public comment
opportunity." If wishing to make a comment via Zoom, comments must be received by 4:00 pm the day of the
meeting. Otherwise, comments will be taken in -person at the meeting in Council Chambers, as noted on the agenda
below.
• Sign up to Provide Oral Public Comment at the Meeting via Calling -In
• Submit Written Public Comment Prior to the Meeting
• Join the Zoom WEB Meeting
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
APPROVAL OF AGENDA
ACTION ITEMS:
1. Motion Consideration: Potential Grant Opportunity: Spokane Regional Transportation Council —
Adam Jackson [public comment opportunity]
2. Motion Consideration: RAISE Grant - Adam Jackson [public comment opportunity]
3. Motion Consideration: Evergreen Preservation Project Bid Award — Gloria Mantz
[public comment opportunity]
NON -ACTION ITEMS:
DISCUSSION LEADER
SUBJECT/ACTIVITY GOAL
4. Gloria Mantz
5. Jerremy Clark
2022 Construction Project Updates Discussion/Information
Transportation Impact Fee Rate Discussion/Information
Studies Update
6. Jerremy Clark, Bill Helbig School Zone Flashing Beacons Discussion/Information
7. Erik Lamb, John Bottelli Potential Grant Opportunity: Recreation Discussion/Information
& Conservation Office (RCO)
8. Cary Driskell, Chief Ellis, Parking Prohibitions Discussion/Information
Jerremy Clark
9. Mayor Haley Advance Agenda Discussion/Information
10. Information Only (will not be discussed or reported):
(a) Independent Salary Commission Final Report; (b) Finance Monthly report
11. Mayor Haley Council Comments Discussion/Information
12. John Hohman City Manager Comments Discussion/Information
ADJOURN
Council Agenda March 15, 2022 Page 1 of 1
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: March 15, 2022 Department Director Approval:
Check all that apply: ['consent ❑ old business ® new business ['public hearing
['information ['admin. report ['pending legislation ['executive session
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Motion Consideration: Potential Grant Opportunity from Spokane
Regional Transportation Council
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 35.77.010: Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: The City has regularly applied to Spokane Regional
Transportation Council (SRTC) for funding a variety of transportation projects. Often these have
aligned with City transportation priorities identified in long-term planning documents such as the
City's 6-Year Transportation Improvement Program or one of many transportation studies. On
February 22, 2022, staff presented an administrative report on this potential funding opportunity.
BACKGROUND: SRTC has announced its call for projects for years 2024-2026. The call
makes available over $43 million for participating local governments within the SRTC region.
The program requires a minimum 13.5% non-federal match for all awarded funds, but if a
project's match exceeds the 13.5% minimum, more points can be scored (E.G. match of 23.5%
or 33.5%, score an additional 5 or 10 points, respectively).
Preliminary eligibility project worksheets were due March 7, 2022, and staff submitted
associated eligibility documents for every project included in the February 22 administrative
report. Submittal of eligibility documents is required for all funding requests to verify compliance
with funding program requirements but does require the City to submit a formal application for
each project. Formal applications are due April 4, 2022. Awards are announced July 14, 2022.
Table 1 below describes the various funding programs available.
Table 1. Available Funds Summary
Fund Type
Available
Funds
Fund Description & Definition
STBG
$28,306,000
Surface Transportation Block Grant (STBG): The most flexible of FHWA
programs. Eligible projects include roadway and bridge construction and
repair, pedestrian and bicycle projects, transit capital projects, and planning
studies.
STBG-Set
Aside
$2,845,000
STBG-Set Aside (STBG-SA): Projects include on- and off -road pedestrian and
bicycle facilities, infrastructure projects for improving non -driver access to
public transportation, and safe routes to school projects.
CMAQ
$9,267,000
Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ): Projects improve air quality in
the region. Examples include transit improvements, travel demand
management strategies, traffic flow improvements, and pedestrian and bicycle
facilities.
HIP
$347,000
Highway Infrastructure Program (HIP): Funds for road, bridge, ferry, transit
capital, Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) capital projects for the
elimination of hazards, and the installation of protective devices at railway -
highway crossings. HIP funds can also be used for charging infrastructure
along alternative fuel corridors.
HIP-
CRRSSA
$2,440,000
HIP-Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplementals Appropriations
(CRRSSA): May be used for activities that are eligible under the STBG funding
program in addition to covering revenue losses, supplanting, or replacing
funds, personnel salaries, operation, and maintenance. There is no local
match required with this funding program.
Page 1 of 3
Of the $43 million available, approximately $14.3 million will be removed from the STBG funded
amount of $28.3 million as "off the top" SRTC Board allocations:
• $2.1 million for the Spokane Regional Transportation Management Center operations
and maintenance costs
• $1.5 million for SRTC planning projects
• $1.5 million designated for small town projects
• $9.2 million preservation call for future years 2024-2025 (City is eligible for these funds
when they are available in the coming year(s))
Considering the available funds in Table 1, the region's demand for project funding far
outweighs the available program funding from this call for projects. Table 2 is provided as an
attachment to this RCA and lists the staff -recommended project applications, including funding
request and city match amounts. Table 2 removes three projects that were initially discussed at
the February 22 administrative report: Argonne Rd. concrete reconstruction and two segments
of the Spokane Valley River Loop Trail Project (Plante's Ferry to Mirabeau Point, Mirabeau
Point to Sullivan Park). Staff does not recommend submitting these project applications so that
we may keep the funding focus on the City's highest priorities. Even with these projects
removed, the City's remaining project requests total nearly $42 million and would require nearly
$10 million of matching funds.
OPTIONS: 1) Proceed with the staff recommendation and motion as written, 2) take other
appropriate action.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to authorize the City Manager, or designee, to
apply to the SRTC grant for those projects identified in ranked order as shown in Table 2.
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: It is not likely that the City will receive awards for all the
project applications. In the 2018 call for projects, the City received approximately $8.5 million of
award funds across six different projects.
Table 2 includes recommended City match amounts ranging from 13.5% to 33.5%. Project
delivery for the awarded projects will be scheduled over three to four years (2023-2026).
Assuming the City is successful in receiving $12 million of awards, which is very aggressive and
optimistic, the local match would be approximately $4 million.
Staff has coordinated with the Finance Department regarding the projected fund balance of Real
Estate Excise Tax (REET) revenues in the coming years. It is estimated that the ending balance
of REET funds in 2025, prior to any of these SRTC projects being awarded, is $5.6 million. This
includes requests for recent grant applications submitted to other funding programs. Staff is
comfortable with the available REET balance and the anticipated required local match.
If the City is highly successful during this grant cycle and exceeds anticipated award amounts,
reduced REET balances may be realized in latter years, such as 2025 or 2026. This may result
in the City's inability to use REET dollars as matching funds for future years, such as 2027 or
later.
STAFF CONTACT: Adam Jackson, Sr. Engineer — Planning & Grants
ATTACHMENTS: Table 2. Recommended Project Applications, Grant Requests and
Matching Funds
Page 2 of 3
Table 2. Recommended Project Applications, Grant Requests and Matching Funds
Rank
Project Name/Description
Funding
Program
Total
Project Cost
2022 Funding
Total
(Request+Match)
2022 SRTC
Request ($)
New Local
Funds Towards
SRTC Match ($)
Total Project
Match for 2022
SRTC Request
1
Pines Road/BNSF GSP
CMAQ
$34,784,000
$ 27,111,527
$23,130,199
$3,981,328
33.5%
2
Bigelow -Sullivan Corridor:
Sullivan/Trent Interchange (PE)(rounding
STBG
$ 3,330,000
$ 2,950,000
$ 2,212,500
$ 737,500
33.6%
present)
3
Broadway Avenue Reconstruction
(Havana Rd. to Fancher Rd.)
STBG
$ 3,937,665
$ 3,847,665
$ 2,618,547
$ 1,229,118
33.5%
4
S. Barker Rd. Corridor: Appleway
Blvd. to Sprague Ave.
STBG
$ 3,150,484
$ 3,082,996
$ 2,095,072
$ 987,924
33.5%
5
S. Barker Rd Corridor: 4th Ave. RAB
CMAQ
$ 2,970,141
$ 2,911,217
$ 2,272,158
$ 639,059
23.5%
6
Spokane Valley River Loop Trail:
STBG-
SA
$ 3,039,148
$ 2,905,141
$ 2,021,033
$ 884,108
33.5%
Sullivan Park to Flora Park (excluding
pedestrian bridge at Flora Rd.)
7
S. Barker Rd. Corridor: 8th Ave. RAB
CMAQ
$ 2,572,069
$ 2,511,939
$ 1,967,633
$ 544,306
23.5%
8
Appleway Trail & Stormwater
Upgrades: Farr Rd. to Dishman-Mica
Rd.
STBG-
SA
$ 1,283,305
$ 1,283,305
$ 1,110,059
$ 173,246
13.5%
9
Argonne Rd. & I-90 Bridge (PE)
STBG
$ 1,500,000
$ 1,500,000
$ 1,297,500
$ 202,500
13.5%
10
S. Barker Rd. Corridor: Sprague Ave.
to 4th Ave.
STBG
$ 2,049,399
$ 2,005,809
$ 1,735,025
$ 270,784
15.3%
11
S. Barker Rd. Corridor: 4th Ave. to 8th
Ave.
STBG
$ 2,185,365
$ 2,137,908
$ 1,849,290
$ 288,618
15.4%
Total
$42,309,016
$9,938,491
Page 3 of 3
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: March 15, 2022 Department Director Approval:
Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ® new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Motion Consideration: Potential Grant Opportunity RAISE FY22
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 35.77.010: Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN:
• Since 2018, the City has submitted an annual application to the RAISE program requesting
project funding for the Pines Road/BNSF Grade Separation Project.
BACKGROUND: The US Department of Transportation (USDOT) issued a call for projects in
January 2022 for the RAISE (Rebuilding American Infrastructure with Sustainability and Equity)
discretionary grant program. The RAISE program has previously used the acronyms BUILD and
TIGER. Projects are scored based on their merits with respect to the following criteria: safety,
environmental sustainability, quality of life, improves mobility and community connectivity,
economic competitiveness and opportunity, state of good repair, partnership and collaboration,
and innovation. Projects are also scored on project readiness and cost effectiveness.
Critical program details are:
Total Available Program Funds: $1.5 billion nationwide
Award Range (Min -Max):
Match Amount:
Application Due Date:
Application Award Date:
Obligation Date (if awarded):
RAISE Funds Expenditure Date:
$5 - $25 million (urban)
$100 million max to any single state
$750 million max awards to urban projects (50%)
$750 million max awards to rural projects (50%)
80% Federal max. (urban), N/A (rural)
20% Non -Federal min. (urban)
April 14, 2022, at 2PM PDT
August 12, 2022
No later than September 30, 2026
No later than September 30, 2031
Staff recommends submitting the Pines Road/BNSF GSP to this call for projects. Funding
awards in 2018 by the Federal Railroad Administration partially funded the preliminary
engineering phase and by the Spokane Regional Transportation Council (SRTC) fully funded
the right-of-way phase. To date, the City has secured $9.75M for the project including the
federal grants and is progressing on a land donation from Avista Utilities valued at $790,000.
Table 1 shows the projected application funding breakdown and captures the February 2022
cost estimate updates provided by the consultant team. The increased project cost will
proportionately require the City to cover the necessary non-federal match amounts required by
the RAISE program.
Page 1 of 2
Table 1. RAISE Application Funding Summary
Future Eligible Project Costs
Total ($)
Total (%)
Federal Funding
Requested RAISE Program
$ 21,689,221
69.29%
Committed STBG Program (Remaining SRTC
Funds)
$ 2,940,000
9.38%
Subtotal $
24,629,221
78.69%
Non -Federal Funding
Committed City of Spokane Valley
$ 2,431,917
7.76%
City of Spokane Valley
Expected BNSF*
Avista Utilities (Land Donation)
$ 3,149,232
$ 300,000
$ 790,000
10.06%
0.96%
2.52%
Subtotal $
6,671,149 21.31%
ible Cost $ 31,300,371 100.00%
*Note: BNSF contribution is anticipated, based on 23 CFR 646.210.
Previously Incurred Project Costs
$ 3,878,014
Total Estimated Project Cost (for RAISE FY22)
$35,178,385
For RAISE program purposes, the total project cost of $35,178,385 represents an inflated cost
that allows the project to account for previous costs associated with the Bridging the Valley
Study ($394,385) and the anticipated land donation from Avista Utilities ($790,000). If those
costs are removed, the total project cost is consistent with the recently updated cost of $34
million that was discussed as part of the City's 2022 federal agenda.
OPTIONS: Move to authorize the City Manager or designee to apply for the RAISE Fiscal Year
2022 grant for the Pines Road/BNSF Grade Separation Project or take other action.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to authorize the City Manager or designee, to
apply for the RAISE Fiscal Year 2022 grant for the Pines Road/BNSF Grade Separation Project.
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: The City has approximately $2.4 million of available local
funds to put towards the program's non-federal match amount of approximately $5.6 million.
Approximately $3.2 million of additional non-federal funds would be needed to satisfy federal
funding requirements. The Finance Dept. has confirmed that the City is likely to have available
matching funds should RAISE funds be awarded; however, it may require the reallocation of
certain capital reserve funds set aside for other future City priorities. If awarded RAISE, staff
would return to City Council for a discussion of available options to satisfy non-federal match
requirements.
For updates to the existing project application, staff contracts with an outside consultant. The
consultant cost for updating a technical appendix to the application is $11,000 and is covered by
the department's existing budget.
STAFF CONTACT: Adam Jackson, Sr. Engineer — Planning & Grants
ATTACHMENTS: N/A
Page 2 of 2
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: March 15, 2022 Department Director Approval:
Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ® new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Motion Consideration: Bid Award — Evergreen Road Preservation -
Broadway Avenue to Mission Avenue.
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: SVMC 3.35.10 — Contract Authority
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN:
• May 18, 2021: Administrative Report on the 2022-2027 Six Year Transportation
Improvement Plan, which included this project.
• June 8, 2021: Council passed Resolution 21-002, adopting the 2022-2027 Six Year
Transportation Improvement Plan, which included this project.
• January 4, 2022: Administrative Report on amending the 2022-2027 Six Year
Transportation Improvement Plan, which included this project.
• January 11, 2022: Council passed Resolution 22-001, adopting the amended 2022-2027
Six Year Transportation Improvement Plan, which included this project.
BACKGROUND:
The road preservation project grinds and provides an asphalt overlay on Evergreen Road from
Broadway Avenue to Mission Avenue. The project includes installation of ADA curb ramps,
pavement repairs, channelization and ITS conduit.
The current estimated project budget and cost are shown below:
Project Costs Project Budget
Preliminary Engineering $ 35,000 City Fund 301 $ 207,000
Construction $ 1,352,000 City Fund 311 $ 1,180,000
Total Estimated Costs $ 1,387,000 Total Budget $ 1,387,000
The project was designed in-house and advertised on February 11, 2022. City received and
opened four bids on February 25, 2022. The engineer's estimate was $1,029,906.00. The lowest,
responsive bidder was Inland Infrastructure, LLC with a bid of $1,099,941.00, approximately 6.8%
($70,000) higher than the engineer's estimate. A bid tabulation is attached.
OPTIONS: Move to award the contract to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder, or take other
appropriate action
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to award the Evergreen Road Preservation Project
CIP #333 to Inland Infrastructure, LLC in the amount of $1,029,906.00 and authorize the City Manager
to finalize and execute construction contract documents.
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: There are sufficient funds available in the project budget to
cover all costs for this project.
STAFF CONTACT: Gloria Mantz, PE, City Engineer
ATTACHMENTS: Bid Tabulation.
BID TABULATION
Evergreen Road Preservation Project
Project CIP No. 0333
Sp oka ne *--�
lly:
ITEM # DESCRPTION UNITS QUANTITY
ENGINEERS ESTIMATE
Inland Infrastructure, LLC
Shamrock Paving, Inc.
Inland Asphalt Company
Poe Asphalt Paving, Inc.
UNIT PRICE I
TOTAL COST
UNIT PRICE I
TOTAL COST
UNIT PRICE I
TOTAL COST
UNIT PRICE I
TOTAL COST
UNIT PRICE I
TOTAL COST
SCHEDULE A -ROAD IMPROVEMENTS
100
MOBILIZATION
L.S.
1
$75,000.00
$
75,000.00
$109,000.00
$
109,000.00
$110,000.00
$
110,000.00
$138,652.00
$
138,652.00
$120,000.00
$
120,000.00
101
DOCUMENTATION COMPLIANCE
CALC.
1
j
$
10,000.00
$
10,000.00
�. �
10,000.00
$
10,000.00
10,000.00
102
REMOVE CEMENT CONCRETE CURB
L.F.
900
$10.00
$
9,000.00
$4.65
$
4,185.00
$16.00
$
14,400.00
$11.00
$
9,900.00
$10.00
$
9,000.00
103
REMOVE CEMENT CONCRETE SIDEWALK
S.Y.
380
$20.00
$
7,600.00
$13.25
$
5,035.00
$30.00
$
11,400.00
$17.25
$
6,555.00
$23.50
$
8,930.00
104
REMOVE CEMENT CONCRETE MEDIAN CURB AND ISLAND
S.Y.
120
$40.00
$
4,800.00
$16.25
$
1,950.00
$28.00
$
3,360.00
$17.50
$
2,100.00
$27.00
$
3,240.00
105
SAWCUT ASPHALT PAVEMENT
L.F.
3,320
$3.00
$
9,960.00
$2.75
$
9,130.00
$2.60
$
8,632.00
$2.00
$
6,640.00
$2.15
$
7,138.00
106
REMOVE EXISTING CATCH BASIN
EACH
2
$500.00
$
1,000.00
$350.00
$
700.00
$1,100.00
$
2,200.00
$1,900.00
$
3,800.00
$915.00
$
1,830.00
107
PAVEMENT REPAIR EXCAVATION INCL. HAUL
S.Y.
2,550
$18.00
$
45,900.00
$18.50
$
47,175.00
$25.00
$
63,750.00
$15.30
$
39,015.00
$26.00
$
66,300.00
108
SOLID WALL PVC STORM SEWER PIPE 10 IN.
L.F.
110
$50.00
$
5,500.00
$55.00
$
6,050.00
$65.00
$
7,150.00
$55.70
$
6,127.00
$76.50
$
8,415.00
109
CATCH BASIN TYPE 1
EACH
1
$2,500.00
$
2,500.00
$2,100.00
$
2,100.00
$2,250.00
$
2,250.00
$3,500.00
$
3,500.00
$3,500.00
$
3,500.00
110
CONNECTION TO EXISTING DRYWELL
EACH
1
$1,000.00
$
1,000.00
$925.00
$
925.00
$1,250.00
$
1,250.00
$1,500.00
$
1,500.00
$2,000.00
$
2,000.00
111
CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE, 8 IN. DEPTH
S.Y.
2,550
$20.00
$
51,000.00
$15.75
$
40,162.50
$18.00
$
45,900.00
$24.80
$
63,240.00
$23.50
$
59,925.00
112
PLANING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT
S.Y.
13,700
$3.00
$
41,100.00
$2.15
$
29,455.00
$2.50
$
34,250.00
$3.60
$
49,320.00
$2.70
$
36,990.00
113
HMACL. 3/8 IN. PG 64H-28
TON
2,300
$100.00
$
230,000.00
$112.00
$
257,600.00
$100.00
$
230,000.00
$92.85
$
213,555.00
$92.00
$
211,600.00
114
HMA FOR PAVEMENT REPAIR CL. 3/8 IN. PG 64H-28, 3.5 IN. DEPTH
S.Y.
780
$35.00
$
27,300.00
$28.00
$
21,840.00
$29.00
$
22,620.00
$23.70
$
18,486.00
$29.00
$
22,620.00
115
HMA FOR PAVEMENT REPAIR CL. 3/8 IN. PG 64H-28, 6 IN. DEPTH
S.Y.
1,770
$40.00
$
70,800.00
$42.00
$
74,340.00
$50.00
$
88,500.00
$38.30
$
67,791.00
$50.00
$
88,500.00
116
JOB MIX COMPLIANCE PRICE ADJUSTMENT
CALC
1
/%, /
$
(1.00)
$
(1.00)
i/ ii ii /o,�j
$
(1.00)
o ii ii / ,,„y
$
1.00
( )
ii ii !�%ii
$
(1.00)
117
COMPACTION PRICE ADJUSTMENT
CALC
1
$
(1.00)
$
(1.00)
$
(1.00)
$
(1.00)
$
(1.00)
118
HMA SURFACE SMOOTHNESS COMPLIANCE
CALC
1
$
(1.00)
$
(1.00)
$
(1.00)
$
(1.00)
$
(1.00)
119
EROSION CONTROL AND WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION
L.S.
1
$5,000.00
$
5,000.00
$25,000.00
$
25,000.00
$5,000.00
$
5,000.00
$12,563.00
$
12,563.00
$10,650.00
$
10,650.00
120
IRRIGATION SYSTEM REVISION
EST.
1
$
10,000.00
$
10,000.00�ii/o
o,;
$
10,000.00
$
10,000.00
$
10,000.00
121
CEMENT CONC. TRAFFIC CURB AND GUTTER
L.F.
690
$25.00
$
17,250.00
$51.00
$
35,190.00
$47.00
$
32,430.00
$69.90
$
48,231.00
$60.00
$
41,400.00
122
CEMENTCONC. PEDESTRIAN CURB
L.F.
250
$20.00
$
5,000.00
$28.75
$
7,187.50
$25.00
$
6,250.00
$50.00
$
12,500.00
$36.50
$
9,125.00
123
PLASTIC LINE
L.F.
10,600
$3.00
$
31,800.00
$3.25
$
34,450.00
$3.00
$
31,800.00
$3.25
$
34,450.00
$2.80
$
29,680.00
124
PLASTIC WIDE LANE LINE
L.F.
3,200
$5.00
$
16,000.00
$4.25
$
13,600.00
$4.00
$
12,800.00
$4.20
$
13,440.00
$7.85
$
25,120.00
125
PLASTIC STOP LINE
L.F.
40
$15.00
$
600.00
$8.25
$
330.00
$10.00
$
400.00
$10.00
$
400.00
$16.10
$
644.00
126
PLASTIC BICYCLE LANE SYMBOL
EACH
9
$300.00
$
2,700.00
$115.00
$
1,035.00
$125.00
$
1,125.00
$115.00
$
1,035.00
$220.00
$
1,980.00
127
PLASTIC TRAFFIC ARROW
EACH
6
$250.00
$
1,500.00
$105.00
$
630.00
$100.00
$
600.00
$100.00
$
600.00
$136.00
$
816.00
128
PERMANENT SIGNING
L.S.
1
$5,000.00
$
5,000.00
$6,600.00
$
6,600.00
$6,200.00
$
6,200.00
$6,500.00
$
6,500.00
$7,200.00
$
7,200.00
129
PROJECT TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL
L.S.
1
$100,000.00
$
100,000.00
$62,600.00
$
62,600.00
$100,000.00
$
100,000.00
$95,700.00
$
95,700.00
$156,500.00
$
156,500.00
130
CONSTRUCTION SURVEYING
L.S.
1
$15,000.00
$
15,000.00
$9,500.00
$
9,500.00
$7,500.00
$
7,500.00
$28,400.00
$
28,400.00
$10,000.00
$
10,000.00
131
SPCC PLAN
L.S.
1
$1,000.00
$
1,000.00
$450.00
$
450.00
$10,000.00
$
10,000.00
$600.00
$
600.00
$1,800.00
$
1,800.00
132
TRENCH FENCE SAFETY COMPLIANCE
CALC.
1
�
$
(1.00)
$
(1.00)
4,
$
(1.00)
$
(1.00)
$
(1.00)
133
TRENCH EXCAVATION SAFETY SYSTEMS
L.S.
1
$2,000.00
$
2,000.00
$450.00
$
450.00
$575.00
$
575.00
$2,100.00
$
2,100.00
$600.00
$
600.00
134
PUBLIC LIAISON REPRESENTATIVE
L.S.
1
$10,000.00
$
10,000.00
$7,000.00
$
7,000.00
$12,000.00
$
12,000.00
$9,000.00
$
9,000.00
$31,665.00
$
31,665.00
135
REPLACE EXISTING WATER VALVE
EACH
14
$1,000.00
$
14,000.00
$525.00
$
7,350.00
$685.00
$
9,590.00
$1,250.00
$
17,500.00
$950.00
$
13,300.00
136
ADJUST EXISTING GAS VALVE
EACH
2
$1,000.00
$
2,000.00
$300.00
$
600.00
$600.00
$
1,200.00
$1,200.00
$
2,400.00
$650.00
$
1,300.00
137
ADJUST EXISTING CATCH BASIN OR DRYWELL
EACH
22
$1,000.00
$
22,000.00
$600.00
$
13,200.00
$685.00
$
15,070.00
$1,550.00
$
34,100.00
$1,100.00
$
24,200.00
138
ADJUST EXISTING MANHOLE
EACH
8
$1,000.00
$
8,000.00
$600.00
$
4,800.00
$685.00
$
5,480.00
$1,500.00
$
12,000.00
$1,100.00
$
8,800.00
139
CEMENT CONC. SIDEWALK
S.Y.
110
$70.00
$
7,700.00
$93.00
$
10,230.00
$85.00
$
9,350.00
$130.40
$
14,344.00
$135.00
$
14,850.00
140
CEMENT CONC. CURB RAMP TYPE PARALLEL A
EACH
12
$1,800.00
$
21,600.00
$2,825.00
$
33,900.00
$3,100.00
$
37,200.00
$4,500.00
$
54,000.00
$3,200.00
$
38,400.00
141
MINOR CHANGE
CALC.
1
'%iiiiiii!iiii%
$
20,000.00
°i°ii°,'
$
20,000.00
'%iii°ii°ii!;/ / '
$
20,000.00
-7,'iiiiiiii!ii
$
20,000.00
'ii'ii'ii!%i „
$
20,000.00
SCHEDULER -TOTAL
$%'
910 606.00
// ii!ii-ii'ii'ii'r $
923 746.00
%%
'/: $
990 228.00
%/ i'ii!ii!ii'oi.
lii'''�'�';�' $
1 070 040.00
O/i„'„'„o,;;o,;;i,,. $
1 118 014.00
,
SCHEDULE B-SIGNAL/ITS IMPROVEMENTS
200
POTHOLE UTILITY
EACH
30
$500.00
$
15,000.00
$605.00
$
18,150.00
$600.00
$
18,000.00
$688.00
$
20,640.00
$635.00
$
19,050.00
201
JUNCTION BOX, TYPE 8
EACH
1
$500.00
$
500.00
$3,025.00
$
3,025.00
$2,800.00
$
2,800.00
$3,000.00
$
3,000.00
$3,200.00
$
3,200.00
202
PULL BOX
EACH
5
$4,000.00
$
20,000.00
$4,000.00
$
20,000.00
$3,700.00
$
18,500.00
$3,900.00
$
19,500.00
$4,240.00
$
21,200.00
203
CONDUIT PIPE 2 IN. DIA.
L.F.
1,970
$40.00
$
78,800.00
$66.00
$
130,020.00
$62.00
$
122,140.00
$64.50
$
127,065.00
$70.00
$
137,900.00
204
MINOR CHANGE
CALC.
1�%��/'//'/�j�'/"
$
5,000.00i/
$
5,000.00
�i'�/'//'��j/'/
$
5,000.00
°
$
5,000.00
, 4�W���Qii
$
5,000.00
SCHEDULE B-TOTAL
$
119,300.00
$
176,195.00
$
166,440.00
$
175,205.00
$
186,350.00
TOTAL BID
$
1,029,906.00
$ 1,099,941.00
$ 1,156,668.00
$ 1,245,245.00
$ 1,304,364.00
1 of 2
BID TABULATION
Evergreen Road Preservation Project
Project CIP No. 0333
Spokane *--
ll .
ITEM # DESCRPTION
UNITS
QUANTITY
ENGINEERS ESTIMATE
Inland Infrastructure, LLC
Shamrock Paving, Inc.
Inland Asphalt Company
Poe Asphalt Paving, Inc.
UNIT PRICE I TOTAL COST
UNIT PRICE I TOTAL COST
UNIT PRICE I TOTAL COST
UNIT PRICE I TOTAL COST
UNIT PRICE I TOTAL COST
CHECKLIST
Addenda Acknowledged
YES
YES
YES
YES
Competitive bids were opened on February 25, 2022. I hereby certify to the
No. 1
✓
✓
✓
✓
best of my ability that this is a true and correct bid tabulation for the
No. 2
✓
✓
✓
✓
Evergreen Road Preservation Project, CIP #0333
Contractor Certification Wage Law Compliance
✓
✓
✓
✓
Contractor's Administrative Information
Subcontractor List
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
—
Bidder Qualification Statement
✓
✓
✓
✓
By Robert Lochmiller, PE
Bid Deposit Form
✓
✓
✓
✓
Bid Deposit Surety Form
✓
✓
✓
✓
Surety Power of Attorney
✓
✓
✓
✓
Representations and Certifications
✓
✓
✓
✓
Recycled Material Form
✓
✓
✓
✓
Corrected Amounts
2 of 2
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: March 15, 2023 Department Director Approval:
Check all that apply: ❑ consent
❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ® admin. Report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: 2022 Capital Improvement Projects
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 35.77.010, Perpetual Advanced Six -Year plans for
coordinated transportation program expenditures.
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN:
• 6/8/2021 Council passed Resolution 21-002 adopting the 2022 TIP, which included
these projects
BACKGROUND: Staff will provide a quick overview of the projects scheduled for construction in
2022.
OPTIONS: Discussion only
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Discussion only
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: There are sufficient funds to cover the cost for these projects.
These projects are funded with a mix of different funds, including City funds, state and/or federal
grants.
STAFF CONTACT: Gloria Mantz, PE, City Engineer
ATTACHMENTS: PowerPoint Presentation
1111111111111 0001m11111111101101111110111111 lillmilil
' r" -
or
Gloria Mantz, PE, City Engineer
March 15, 2022
Buckeye Sewer Extension
2
NORTH
Montgomery to
Eastern City
limits
p
S okane
0 Valley
3
Barker Road Corridor Projects
Barker Rd/BNSF Grade Separation 2021/2022
Barker at UPRR & Multi -use
path (Euclid to Trent) - 2023
Multi -use path
(River to Euclid) 2022
"
7
E s L
-A
7'
c.: 7:
....j o
,.
• :::, .._,
reiG
pE I•c70:r..4%.• E
E
Intersection Improvement Projects
SULLIVAN Ra
MATCH INTO SPOKANE COUNTY
SULLIVAN ROAD PROJECT
WELLESLEY AVE
Sullivan & Wellesley Intersection Project
4
Sprague & Barker Intersection Project
CII1 UI
Spokane
40,00Valley
5
Balfour Park Improvements
1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
SPRAGUE AVE.
MAIN AVENUE
c�-
MR PHASE 1 CONSTRUCTION
FUTURE PHASES
(TEMPORARY SEEDED AREA)
a
Q
Et
O
Spokan' e�,'
J0Valley
Spokane
0 Valley
Pedestrian Improvement Projects
Spokane
Valley
Wilbur Road — Boone to Mission
Sullivan Park Waterline
Spokane
.� Valley
Evergreen Road Preservation- Broadway to Mission
Sprague Avenue Preservation- Havana to Fancher
2022 Local Access Streets — Summerfield East
10
NORTH
Spokane
.000 Valley
Mission Ave. Over Evergreen Rd. Bridge Deck Seal
..-.. ➢PEW, 110
11
IllililfJlflllflrlktlllttttl7lllfl)I it I lh1jl
12
Citywide Reflective Post Panels
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
p
S okane
0 Valley
13
uestions?
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
p
S okane
0 Valley
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: March 15, 2022 Department Director Approval:
Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ® admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Transportation Impact Fee Rate Studies, Updates
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 36.70A.070(6)(b); RCW 43.21 C; RCW 82.02.050-.110;
WAC 197-11; WAC 365-196-850; SVMC 17.110-010; SVMC 22.100.
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN:
December 15, 2020: Council approved Ordinance No. 20-026 to establish Transportation Impact
Fees as part of CTA-2020-0005 and to adopt the South Barker Corridor Transportation Impact
Fee Rate Study.
December 22, 2020: Council approved Resolution No. 20-016 to update the Master Fee Schedule
to include the South Barker Corridor Transportation Impact Fees.
July 13, 2021: Council approved Ordinance No. 21-008 to adopt the Mirabeau and North Pines
Road Subarea Transportation Impact Fee Rate Study
August 2, 2021: Council approved Resolution No. 21-004 to Amend the Master Fee Schedule to
include the Mirabeau Subarea Transportation Impact Fees and the North Pines Road Subarea
Transportation Impact Fees.
BACKGROUND: The previously adopted Transportation Impact Fee (TIF) Rate Studies for the
South Barker Corridor, Mirabeau Subarea, and North Pines Road Subarea (herein referred to as
"Rate Studies") were developed using the 10th Edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers
(ITE) Trip Generation Manual. In September, 2021, ITE published an updated version of the
manual as the 11th Edition. Pursuant to Section 3.2 of the Spokane Valley Street Standards, the
City requires development projects to be evaluated based on the current version of the Trip
Generation Manual. In order to remain consistent with development requirements, the City has
updated the traffic impact fee rate tables based on the trip generation rates published in the Trip
Generation Manual, 11th Edition. The update of the impact fee rate tables is also consistent with
SVMC 22.100.150 where the impact fee rate tables are required to be reviewed from time to time
to address changes to rates.
Staff contracted with a transportation engineering and planning firm, Fehr & Peers, to complete
an update to the Rate Studies previously adopted. An Addendum has been provided for each
study including the cost per trip calculation table and the impact fee rate tables summarized for
common land uses, as attached to this request.
The following list highlights the updated per -trip impact fees based on the Trip Generation Manual,
11th Edition.
Transportation Impact Fee Area 10
South Barker Corridor
Mirabeau Subarea
North Pines Road Subarea
th
— Edition Cost per Trip 1111 Edition Cost per Trip
$1,272 per trip
$716 per trip
$2,816 per trip
$1,153 per trip
$698 per trip
$2,195 per trip
Chapter 22.100 SVMC was adopted in December, 2020 and imposes impact fees in all areas
identified pursuant to adopted rate studies in such amounts as adopted pursuant to the rate
studies and Master Fee Schedule. Staff are recommending adoption of the Rate Study Addenda
to allow assessment and collection of impact fees consistent with the City's Street Standards.
After adoption of the Rate Study Addenda, staff will come forward with an amendment to the
Master Fee Schedule for the South Barker Corridor, Mirabeau Subarea, and North Pines Road
Subarea impact fees.
This administrative report will discuss the process used to update the Rate Studies and proposed
changes to the impact fee schedule to be applied towards new development in the designated
TIF areas.
OPTIONS: 1) Consensus to proceed with first reading of an Ordinance adopting the updates;: or
2) Take other appropriate action.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Council consensus to proceed with first reading of an
Ordinance adopting the updated Transportation Impact Fee Rate Studies.
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: There is no additional cost to the City if the proposed Rate
Study Addenda and associated Transportation Impact Fee rates are adopted. Proposed impact
fees are anticipated to generate up to $7.34 million of new revenue to be applied to transportation
system improvements identified in the Rate Studies.
STAFF CONTACT: Bill Helbig, Community & Public Works Director; Jerremy Clark, Traffic
Engineering Manager
ATTACHMENTS:
1. PowerPoint Presentation
2. Addendum to South Barker Corridor Transportation Impact Fee Rate Study
3. Addendum to Mirabeau and North Pines Transportation Impact Fee Rate Study
FEHR PEERS
Memorandum
Date: February 25, 2022
To: Jerremy Clark, City of Spokane Valley
From: Patrick Picard, Arnav Duarah, and Chris Breiland, Fehr & Peers
Subject: Addendum to South Barker Corridor TIF Rate Studies with ITE 11t" Edition Trip
Generation Rates
D1V21-0719
Summary
This memo serves as an addendum to the South Barker Corridor Transportation Impact Fee Rate
Study for City of Spokane Valley, providing revised trip rates based on updated trip generation
rates from the recently released 11' Edition of the ITE Trip Generation Manual. The following
tables reflect the updated trip rates and effectively supersede the corresponding tables in the
existing report. All other aspects of the existing TIF Rate Study, including the estimated project
costs, forecast land use growth, and general methodology remain unchanged. This memo simply
provides the updated TIF rates based on the most current published ITE trip generation rates.
Updated Tables
The following tables have been updated based on the 11th Edition of the ITE Trip Generation
Manual and reflect the current TIF rates by which the City of Spokane Valley would assess
developer impact fees in the South Barker Corridor TIF area. The updated cost per PM peak trip in
the South Barker Corridor TIF area of Spokane Valley is $1,153, which compares to $1,272 in the
previous version of the study dated September, 2020. The decrease in cost is due primarily to a an
increase in the ITE trip rates for General Office Building and Medical Clinic between the 10"
Edition and 11" Edition of the ITE Trip Generation Manual, which increased the forecast growth in
PM peak trips from 2,857 to 3,154.
518 17th Street Suite 11001 Denver, CO 80202 1 (303) 296-4300 1 Fax (303) 296-4302
www.fehrandpeers.com
Jerremy Clark
February 25, 2022
Page 2 of 3
Table 2 Updated
Table 2. Growth in Study Area PM Peak Hour Vehicle Trips (2015-2040)
SRTC Land Us:
2015-
(LU) 2040 LU
Growth
Unit of ITE
Measure Code
ITE Description
ITE Average
Trip Rate 1
(PM peak
hr.)
Growth in
Trips (LU
growth x
trip rate)
Single Family
Residential
Multi -Family
Residential
Hotel/Motel
Agriculture, Forestry,
Mining, Industrial,
Manufacturing,
Wholesale
Retail Trade (Non -
Central Business
District)
Services and Offices
Finance, Insurance,
and Real Estate
Services (FIRES)
Medical
Retail Trade (CBD)
Education
Employees
University
Employees
917 Dwelling
Units
Dwelling
1,070
Units
210
220
Single -Family
Detached Housing
Multifamily Housing
(Low -Rise)
200 Rooms 310 Hotel
0 Employees N/A N/A
280 Employees
654 Employees
62 Employees
503 Employees
0 Employees
35 Employees
0 Employees
820 Shopping Center
0.94
862
0.51 546
0.59 118
N/A 0
1.80 504
General Office
710 0.45 294
Building
General Office
710 0.45 28
Building
630 Clinic
N/A N/A
520 Elementary School
N/A N/A
1.47 739
N/A 0
1.78 62
N/A 0
Total Growth in PM Peak Hour Trips 3,1542
1. ITE Trip Generation Manual, 11' Edition; average trip rate of adjacent street traffic 4-6 PM was used for all land uses
given growth will occur among developments of various sizes.
2. Estimated growth in trips differ from the findings in the South Barker Corridor Study because estimates in this study are
based on the ITE trip generation rates as opposed to trip growth outputs of the SRTC regional travel demand model.
Jerremy Clark
February 25, 2022
Page 3 of 3
Table 5 Updated
Table 5. Impact Fee Schedule
I o „
City of Spokane Valley South Barker Corridor Transportation Impact Fee Rate Schedule
PM Peak Vehicle Passby Adjusted Trips Impact Fee Per Unit ° @
ITE Land Use Category r z per Unit o f
Trip Rate Measure3 $1,153 per PM Peak Vehicle Trip
210
Single Family & Duplex
0.94
0%
0.94
$1,084 per dwelling unit
220
Multi -Family (Low -Rise) - Not Close to Rail Transit
0.51
0%
0.51
$588 per dwelling unit
310
Hotel (3 or More Levels)
0.59
0%
0.59
$680 per room
520
Elementary School
1.78
0%
1.78
$2,052 .erem.lo ee5
630
Medical Clinic
0.00369
0%
0.00369
$4.25 per sq ft
710
General Office
0.00144
0%
0.00144
$1.66 per sq ft
820
Sho..in. Center
0.0034
29%
0.00241
$2.78 .ers. ft
ITE Trip Generation Manual (11th Edition): 4-6 PM Peak Hour Vehicle Trip Generation Rates for the Adjacent Street Traffic (weekday 4-6PM); This
worksheet represents only the generalized land uses in the SRTC regional travel demand model and is NOT all-inclusive; see Table 6 for a wider variety of
uses; Projects with land uses not in Table 5 or 6 shall prepare a trip generation and distribution letter and will be responsible for a fee based on $1,153 per
PM peak hour trip.
2 Pass by rates were updated based on the Pass -By Data and Rate Tables/2021 Pass -By Tables for ITETripGen Appendices, 11th Edition
3 PM peak trip rate excluding passby trips
4 sq ft = square feet, room = available hotel/motel room
ITE also includes a student -based trip rate which may be used if approved by Spokane Valley
Table 6 Updated
Table 6. Expanded Impact Fee Schedule
01 171�I
Land USfi
Grou P l
Residential
ITE Code .
210 Single
220 Multi-Famil
City of Spokane Valley South Barker Corridor
ITE Land Use Category
Family & Duplex
(Low -Rise) - Not Close to Rail Transit
Transportation Impac
PM Peak
Vehicle
Trip Passby %2
Rater
0.94 0%
0.51 0%
Fee Rate Schedule
Adjusted Trips
per Unit of
Measure 3
0.94
0.51
Impact
$1,153 per
$1,084
$588
Fee Per Unit ° @
PM Peak Vehicle Trip
per dwelling unit
.erdwellin.unit
310 Hotel (3 or More Levels)
0.59 0%
0.59
$680
per room
Services
492 Health Club
0.00345 0%
0.00345
$3.98
persq ft
912 Bank
0.02101 35%
0.01366
$15.74
.ers. ft
520 Elementary School
178 0%
1.78000
$2,052
per employee
Institution
522 Middle School
194 0%
1.94000
$2,236
per employee
525 High School
161 0%
1.61000
$1,856
.erem.lo ee5
975 Drinking Establishment
0.01136 43%
0.00648
$7.46
persq ft
Restaurant
934 Fast Food Restaurant (with drive-thru)
0.03303 55%
0.01486
$17.13
per sq ft
938 Coffee Sho. with Drive-Thru (no indoorseatin.)
15.08 89%
1.65880
$1,912
.er drive-thru lane
820 Shopping Center
0.0034 29%
0.00241
$2.78
per sq ft
Retail
841 Automobile Sales - Used/New
0.00375 0%
0.00375
$4.32
per sq ft
945 Convenience Store/Gas Station -GFA(4-5.5k)
22.76 66%
7.74
$8,921
.er.um.
110 Light Industry/High Technology
0.00065 0%
0.00065
$0.75
per sq ft
140 Manufacturing
0.00074 0%
0.00074
$0.85
persq ft
Industrial
150 Warehousing
0.00018 0%
0.00018
$0.21
persq ft
151 Mini-Stora.e
0.0168 0%
0.01680
$19.37
.erstora.eunit
710 General Office
0.00144 0%
0.00144
$1.66
per sq ft
Office
720 Medical Office / Clinic
0.00393 0%
0.00393
$4.53
per sq ft
750 Office Park
0.0013 0%
0.00130
$1.50
.ers.ft
1 ITE Trip Generation Manual (11th Edition): 4-6 PM Peak Hour Vehicle Trip Genera ion Rates for the Adjacent Street Traffic (weekday 4-6PM); This worksheet
represents only the most common uses in southeast Spokane Valley and is NOT all-inclusive; Projects with land uses not in Table 5 or 6 shall prepare a trip
generation and distribution letter and will be responsible fora fee based on $1,153 per PM peak hour trip.
z Pass by rates were updated based on the Pass -By Data and Rate Tables/2021 Pass -By Tables for ITETripGen Appendices, 11th Edition
3 PM peak trip rate excluding passby trips
4 sq ft = square feet, pump = vehicle fueling position(VFA), room = available hotel room
5 ITE also includes a student -based trip rate which may be used if approved by Spokane Valley
FEHR PEERS
Memorandum
Date: February 25, 2022
To: Jerremy Clark, City of Spokane Valley
From: Patrick Picard, Arnav Duarah, and Chris Breiland, Fehr & Peers
Subject: Addendum to Mirabeau and North Pines TIF Rate Studies with ITE 1 Edition
Trip Generation Rates
DN27-07/9
Summary
This memo serves as an addendum to the Mirabeau & North Pines Road Subarea Transportation
Impact Fee Rate Study for City of Spokane Valley, providing revised trip rates based on updated
trip generation rates from the recently released 11 t" Edition of the ITE Trip Generation Manual.
The following tables reflect the updated trip rates and effectively supersede the corresponding
tables in the existing report. All other aspects of the existing TIF Rate Study, including the
estimated project costs, forecast land use growth, and general methodology remain unchanged.
This memo simply provides the updated TIF rates based on the most current published ITE trip
generation rates.
Updated Tables
The following tables have been updated based on the 11th Edition of the ITE Trip Generation
Manual and reflect the current TIF rates by which the City of Spokane Valley would assess
developer impact fees in the Mirabeau and North Pines Road Subareas. The updated cost per PM
peak trip is $698 in the Mirabeau Subarea and $2,195 in the North Pines Road Subarea, which
compares to $716 for the Mirabeau Subarea and $2,816 for the North Pines Road Subarea in the
previous version of the study dated June 2021. The decrease in cost is due primarily to an increase
in the ITE trip rates for General Office Building and Medical Clinic between the 10th Edition and
11th Edition of the ITE Trip Generation Manual, which increased the forecast growth in PM peak
trips from 1,973 to 2,022 in the Mirabeau Subarea and from 911 to 1,169 in the North Pines Road
Subarea.
518 17th Street Suite 11001 Denver, CO 80202 1 (303) 296-4300 1 Fax (303) 296-4302
www.fehrandpeers.com
Jerremy Clark
February 25, 2022
Page 2 of 6
Table 2 Updated
Table 1. Growth in Mirabeau TIF Area PM Peak Hour Vehicle Trips (2015-2040)
Land Use (LU)
2015 ITE Average Growth in
Unit of ITE Trip Rate 1 Trips (LU
2040 LU ITE Description
Growth Measure Code (PM peak growth x
hr.) trip rate)
Single Family
Residential
Multi -Family
Residential
65 210 Single -Family
Detached Housing
979 220 Multifamily Housing
(Low -Rise)
Hotel/Motel 150 Rooms 310 Hotel
Retail Trade 63.89
Dwelling
Units
Dwelling
Units
Thousand
Square Feet
820 Shopping Center
0.94
62
0.51 500
0.59 89
3.4 218
General Office
Office 2,561 Employees 710 0.45 1,153
Building
Total Growth in PM Peak Hour Trips 2,022
1. ITE Trip Generation Manual, 11t" Edition; average trip rate of adjacent street traffic 4-6 PM was used for all land uses
given growth will occur among developments of various sizes.
Table 3 Updated
Table 2. Growth in North Pines Road TIF Area PM Peak Hour Vehicle Trips (2015-
2040)
SRTC Land Use (LU)
2015 ITE Average Growth in
Unit of ITE Trip Rate 1 Trips (LU
2040 LU ITE Description
Growth Measure Code (PM peak growth x
hr.) trip rate)
Single Family
Residential
Multi -Family
Residential
Hotel/Motel
78 Dwelling
Units
157 Dwelling
Units
210
220
Single -Family
Detached Housing
Multifamily Housing
(Low -Rise)
0 Rooms N/A N/A
0.94
74
0.51 81
N/A 0
Agriculture, Forestry,
Mining, Industrial, General Light
79 Employees 110 0.49 39
Manufacturing, Industrial
Wholesale
Retail Trade (Non -
Central Business
District)
155 Employees 820 Shopping Center
1.8 279
Jerremy Clark
February 25, 2022
Page 3 of 6
SRTC Land Use (LU)
2015 Unit of
2040 LU
Growth Measure
ITE
Code ITE Description
ITE Average Growth in
Trip Rate 1 Trips (LU
(PM peak growth x
hr.) trip rate)
Services and Offices 248 Employees
Finance, Insurance,
and Real Estate
Services (FIRES)
Medical
Retail Trade (CBD)
Education
Employees
University
Employees
11 Employees
371 Employees
0 Employees
General Office
710 Building
General Office
710 Building
630 Clinic
N/A N/A
18 Employees 520 Elementary School
0 Employees N/A N/A
0.45
0.45
112
5
1.47 546
N/A 0
1.78
N/A
0
Total Growth in PM Peak Hour Trips
1,1692
1. ITE Trip Generation Manual, 11`" Edition; average trip rate of adjacent street traffic 4-6 PM was used for all land uses
given growth will occur among developments of various sizes.
2. Estimated growth in trips is slightly higher than the findings in the Mirabeau Subarea Traffic Study Update (2019)
because the retail trip generation is based on employees instead of square foot and the trip generation from the school
land use was updated.
Table 7 Updated
Table 3. Cost Per PM Peak Hour Trip Calculations
TIF Area
2015-2040
Fair Share Eligible Growth in PM Cost per PM
Project Costs Peak Hour Peak Hour Trip
Trips
Mirabeau TIF
North Pines Road TIF
$1,412,330
$2,565,500
2,022
1,169
$698
$2,195
Jerremy Clark
February 25, 2022
Page 4 of 6
Table 8 Updated
Table 4. Mirabeau Impact Fee Schedule
ITE Cod
IIITrip
VIII
City of Spokane Valley Mirabeau Transportation Impact Fee Rate Schedule
PM Peak Vehicle Passby Adjusted Trips
r ITE Land Use Category z per Unit of
Rate % Measure'
Impact Fee
$698 per PM
Per Unit 4 @
Peak Vehicle Trip
210
Single Family & Duplex
0.94
0%
0.94
$657
per dwelling unit
220
Multi -Family (Low -Rise) - Not Close to Rail Transit
0.51
0%
0.51
$356
per dwelling unit
310
Hotel (3 or More Levels)
0.59
0%
0.59
$412
per room
520
Elementary School
1.78
0%
1.78
$1,243
.erem.lo ee 5
630
Medical Clinic
0.00369
0%
0.00369
$2.58
per sq ft
710
General Office
0.00144
0%
0.00144
$1.01
per sq ft
820
Sho..in. Center
0.0034
29%
0.00241
$1.69
.ers. ft
ITE Trip Generation Manual (11th Edition): 4-6 PM Peak Hour Vehicle Trip Generation Rates for the Adjacent Street Traffic (weekday 4-6PM); This
worksheet represents only the generalized land uses in the SRTC regional travel demand model and is NOT all-inclusive; see Table 10 or a wider variety of
uses; Projects with land uses not in Table 8 or 10 shall prepare a trip generation and distribution letter and will be responsible for a fee based on $698 per
PM peak hour trip.
2 Pass by rates were updated based on the Pass -By Data and Rate Tables/2021 Pass -By Tables for ITETripGen Appendices, 11th Edition
PM peak trip rate excluding passby trips
sq ft = square feet, room = available hotel/motel room
ITE also includes a student -based trip rate which may be used if approved by Spokane Valley
Table 9 Updated
Table 5. North Pines Road Impact Fee Schedule
ITE Code
City of Spokane Valley North Pines Road Transportation Impact Fee Rate Schedule
^III PM Peak Vehicle Passby Adjusted Trips Impact Fee Per Unit ° @
1TE Land Use Category z per Unit of
Trip Rate %23 $2,195 per PM Peak Vehicle Trip
210
Single Family & Duplex
0.94
0%
0.94
$2,063 per dwelling unit
220
Multi -Family (Low -Rise) - Not Close to Rail Transit
0.51
0%
0.51
$1,119 per dwelling unit
310
Hotel (3 or More Levels)
0.59
0%
0.59
$1,295 per room
520
Elementary School
1.78
0%
1.78000
$3,906 .erem.lo ee5
630
Medical Clinic
0.00369
0%
0.00369
$8.10 per sq ft
710
General Office
0.00144
0%
0.00144
$3.16 per sq ft
820
Sho..in. Center
0.0034
29%
0.00241
$5.30 .ers. ft
ITE Trip Generation Manual (11th Edition): 4-6 PM Peak Hour Vehicle Trip Generation Rates for the Adjacent Street Traffic (weekday 4-6PM); This
worksheet represents only the generalized land uses in the SRTC regional travel demand model and is NOT all-inclusive; see Table 11 for a wider variety
of uses; Projects with land uses not in Table 9 or 11 shall prepare a trip generation and distribution letter and will be responsible for a fee based on $2,195
per PM peak hour trip.
2 Pass by rates were updated based on the Pass -By Data and Rate Tables/2021 Pass -By Tables for ITETripGen Appendices, 11th Edition
3 PM peak trip rate excluding passby trips
4 sq ft = square feet, room = available hotel/motel room
ITE also includes a student -based trip rate which may be used if approved by Spokane Valley
Jerremy Clark
February 25, 2022
Page 5 of 6
Table 10 Updated
Table 6. Expanded Mirabeau Impact Fee Schedule
and Use
Group
J1 '"
E Code
lCity of Spokane Valley Mirabeau Transportation
ITE Land Use Category
Impact Fee Rate
PM Peak
Vehicle passby%2
Trip Rate
Schedule
Adjusted Trips
per Unit of
Measure 3
Impact Fee
$698 per PM
Per Unit 4
Peak Vehicle Trip
Residential
210
220
Single Family & Duplex
Multi-Famil (Low -Rise) - Not Close to Rail Transit
0.94 0%
0.51 0%
0.94
0.51
$657
$356
per dwelling unit
•er dwellin• unit
Services
310
492
912
Hotel (3 or More Levels)
Health Club
Bank
0.59 0%
0.00345 0%
0.02101 35%
0.59
0.00345
0.01366
$412
$241
$9.54
per room
persq ft
per sgft
Institution
520
522
525
Elementary School
Middle School
High School
1.78 0%
1.94 0%
1.61 0%
1.78000
1.94000
1.61000
$1,243
$1,355
$1,125
peremployee5
peremployee5
peremployee5
Restaurant
975
934
938
Drinking Establishment
Fast Food Restaurant (with drive-thru)
Coffee Shop with Drive-Thru (no indoor seating)
0.01136 43%
0.03303 55%
15.08 89%
0.00648
0.01486
1.65880
$4.52
$10.38
$1,159
persq ft
persq ft
per drive-thru lane
Retail
820
841
945
Shopping Center
Automobile Sales - Used/New
Convenience Store/Gas Station-GFA(4-5.5k)
0.0034 29%
0.00375 0%
22.76 66%
0.00241
0.00375
7.74
$1.69
$262
$5,405
per sq ft
per sq ft
•er •um
Industrial
110
140
150
151
Light Industry/High Technology
Manufacturing
Warehousing
Mini-Stora•e
0.00065 0%
0.00074 0%
0.00018 0%
0.0168 0%
0.00065
0.00074
0.00018
0.01680
$0.45
$0.52
$0.13
$11.73
per sq ft
persq ft
persq ft
•erstora•eunit
Office
710
720
750
General Office
Medical Office/Clinic
Office Park
0.00144 0%
0.00393 0%
0.0013 0%
0.00144
0.00393
0.00130
$1.01
$275
$0.91
persq ft
per sq ft
persq ft
1 ITE Trip Gene ation Manual (11th Edition): 4-6 PM Peak Hour Vehicle Trip Generation Rates for the Adjacent Street Traffic (weekday 4-6PM); This worksheet
represents only the most common uses in southeast Spokane Valley and is NOT all-inclusive; Projects with land uses not in Table 8 or 10 sha I prepare a trip
generation and distribution letter and will be responsible for a fee based on $698 per PM peak hour trip.
2 Pass by rates were updated based on the Pass -By Data and Rate Tables/2021 Pass -By Tables for ITETripGen Appendices, 11th Edition
3 PM peak trip rate excluding passby trips
4 sq ft = square feet, pump = vehicle fueling position(VFA), room = available hotel room
5 ITE also includes a student -based trip rate which may be used if approved by Spokane Valley
Jerremy Clark
February 25, 2022
Page 6 of 6
Table 11 Updated
Table 7. Expanded North Pines Road Impact Fee Schedule
Grou pu
L
Land Us
P
ITE
Code T
III City of Spokane Valley North Pines Road Transportation
ITE Land Use Category
Impact Fee Rate Schedule
PM Peak Adjusted Trips
Vehicle
Trip passby %2 per Unit of
Rates Measures
Impact Fee Per Unit °
$2,195 per PM Peak Vehicle Trip
Residential
210
220
Single Family & Duplex
Multi -Family (Low -Rise) - Not Close to Rail Transit
0.94
0.51
0%
0%
0.94
0.51
$2,063 per dwelling unit
$1,119 per dwelling unit
310
Hotel (3 or More Levels)
0.59
0%
0.59
$1,295 per room
Services
492
Health Club
0.00345
0%
0.00345
$7.57 persq ft
912
Bank
0.02101
35%
0.01366
$29.97 •ers• ft
520
Elementary School
1.78
0%
1.78000
$3,906 per employee 5
Institution
522
Middle School
1.94
0%
1.94000
$4,258 per employee 5
525
High School
1.61
0%
1.61000
$3,533 •erem•lo cc
975
Drinking Establishment
0.01136
43%
0.00648
$14.21 persq ft
Restaurant
934
Fast Food Restaurant (with drive-thru)
0.03303
55%
0.01486
$32.62 per sq ft
938
Coffee Shop with Drive-Thru (no indoor seating)
15.08
89%
1.65880
$3,640 per drive-thru lane
820
Shopping Center
0.0034
29%
0.00241
$5.30 persq ft
Retail
841
Automobile Sales - Used/New
0.00375
0%
0.00375
$8.23 per sq ft
945
Convenience Store/Gas Station-GFA(4-5.5k)
22.76
66%
7.74
$16,983 per pump
110
Light Industry/High Technology
0.00065
0%
0.00065
$1.43 persq ft
140
Manufacturing
0.00074
0%
0.00074
$1.62 per sgft
Industrial
150
Warehousing
0.00018
0%
0.00018
$0.40 persq ft
151
Mini -Storage
0.0168
0%
0.01680
$36.87 per storage unit
710
General Office
0.00144
0%
0.00144
$3.16 persq ft
Office
720
Medical Office / Clinic
0.00393
0%
0.00393
$8.62 per sq ft
750
Office Park
0.0013
0%
0.00130
$2.85 persq ft
1 ITE Trip Genera 'on Manual (11th Edition): 4-6 PM Peak Hour Vehicle Trip Generation Rates for the Adjacent Street Traffic (weekday 4-6PM); This worksheet
represents only the most common uses in southeast Spokane Valley and is NOT all-inclusive; Projects with land uses not in Table 9 or 11 shall prepare a trip
generation and distribution letter and will be responsible for a fee based on $2,19 per PM peak hour trip.
2 Pass by rates were updated based on the Pass -By Data and Rate Tables/2021 Pas -By Tables for ITETripGen Appendices, 11th Edition
3 PM peak trip rate excluding passby trips
4 sq ft = square feet, pump = vehicle fueling position(VFA), room = available hotel room
5 ITE also includes a student -based trip rate for ITE Code 520 & 522 which may be used if approved by Spokane Valley
Sj�kiiine
«1OValley
Transportation Impact Fee
Rate Study Updates
March 15, 2022
Bill Helbig, Community & Public Works Director
Jerremy Clark, Traffic Engineering Manager
Impact Fee History
Spokane
,,.Valley
December, 2020 — Ordinance 20-026 adopted to establish transportation
impact fees in the City of Spokane Valley. South Barker Corridor fee area
established and incorporated into the Master Fee Schedule
■ July, 2021 — Ordinance 21-008 adopted to adopt Mirabeau and North Pines
Road Subarea Transportation Impact Fee Rate Study and incorporate these
two fee areas into the Master Fee Schedule
Mitigation cost per trip for each fee area was calculated based on the ITE
Trip Generation Manual, 1 0th Edition
■ September, 2021 — An updated Trip Generation Manual was published as the
llth Edition. The City Street Standards require new development projects to
calculate trips based on the current version of the Manual.
December, 2021 — The City contracted with Fehr & Peers to update the rate
studies and impact fee rate tables based on the current version of the
2 Manual.
Trip Generation Changes
Spokane
�sValley
Industrial Land Uses
Light Industrial trip rates and Manufacturing trip rates slightly increased
Mini -Storage trip rates slightly decreased and were revised to "per -unit"
Warehousing land use was added to the table
Residential Land Uses
Several changes to land use types and descriptions
Single Family Detached Housing trip rates slightly decreased
Single Family "Attached" Housing was added, which slightly decreased
Multifamily Housing trip rates.
Hotel Land Use trip rates slightly decreased
3
Trip Generation Changes
Spokane
�sValley
Institutional Land Uses (Schools)
Categories were renumbered
Trips per square foot were removed, now based on number of employees
Office Land Uses
Trip rates increased by 13%-25%
Retail Land Uses
Shopping Center was subdivided into three categories; trip rates slightly
decreased
Several Convenience Market/Gasoline Station land uses were combined with
sub -categories; trip rates slightly decreased
4
5
Trip Generation Changes
Spokane
Valley
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
■ Service Land Uses
■ Bank and Fast -Food trip rates slightly increased
■ Coffee Shop trip rates slightly decreased
TIF rate table was updated to clarify "No indoor seating" based on calculated
trips
■ Big Picture
■ Trip Rates
■ Trip Rates
More Trips Overall at Same Project Cost =
Cost Per Unit
Cost Per Trip
Impact Fees: Rate Comparison
Spokane
�sValley
11111111
City of Spokane Valley Impact Fee
Per Unit Updates
Calculation
South Barker
Corridor
Mirabeau
Subarea
North Pines Road
Subarea
Land Use Group ITE Codes ITE Land Use Category
Unit
10th Ed.
11th Ed.
10th Ed.
11th Ed.
10th Ed.
llth Ed.
Overall cost per vehicle trip
$1,272
$1,153
$716
$698
$2,816
$2,195
210
Single Family & Duplex
per dwelling unit
$1,260
$1,084
$709
$657
$2,788
$2,063
Residential
220
Multi -Family (Low -Rise) - Not Close to Rail Transit
per dwelling unit
$713
$588
$401
$356
$1,577
$1,119
310
Hotel (3 or More Levels)
per room
$891
$680
$501
$412
$1,971
$1,295
Services
492
Health Club
per sq ft
$4.39
$3.98
$2.47
$2.41
$9.72
$7.57
912
Bank
per sq ft
$17.17
$15.74
$9.66
$9.54
$38.01
$29.97
520
Elementary School
per employeel
$1.74
$2,052
$0.98
$1,243
$3.86
$3,906
Institution
522
Middle School
per employeel
$1.51
$2,236
$0.85
$1,355
$3.35
$4,258
525 530 5
High School
.er em.Io eel
$1.23
$1,856
$0.69
$1,125
$2.73
$3,533
975(925)5
Drinking Establishment
per sq ft
$8.24
$7.46
$4.64
$4.52
$18.24
$14.21
Restaurant
934
Fast Food Restaurant (with drive-thru)
per sq ft
$20.78
$17.13
$11.69
$10.38
$46.00
$32.62
938(937)
Coffee Shop with Drive-Thru (no indoor seating)
.er Iane2
$6.07
$1,912
$3.42
$1,159
$13.44
$3,640
820
Shopping Center
per sq ft
$3.20
$2.78
$1.80
$1.69
$7.08
$5.30
Retail
841
Automobile Sales - Used/New
per sq ft
$4.77
$4.32
$2.68
$2.62
$10.56
$8.23
945 853 5
Convenience Store/Gas Station-GFA(4-5.5k)
per pump
$9,968
$8,921
$5,608
$5,405
$22,060
$16,983
110
Light Industry/High Technology
per sq ft
$0.80
$0.75
$0.45
$0.45
$1.77
$1.43
140
Manufacturing
per sq ft
$0.85
$0.85
$0.48
$0.52
$1.89
$1.62
Industrial
150
Warehousing
per sq ft
$0.21
$0.13
$0.40
151
Mini -Storage
.er unit3
$0.22
$19.37
$0.12
$11.73
$0.48
$36.87
710
General Office
per sq ft
$1.46
$1.66
$0.82
$1.01
$3.24
$3.16
Office
720
Medical Office/ Clinic
per sq ft
$4.40
$4.53
$2.48
$2.75
$9.74
$8.62
750
Office Park
per sq ft
$1.36
$1.50
$0.77
$0.91
$3.01
$2.85
Trip -per -square foot rate was removed from ITE Trip Generation Manual, calculations are revised based on number of employees
2 Trip -per -square foot rate was removed from ITE Trip Generation Manual, calculations are revised based on number of drive-thru lanes
3 Calculations are revised based on number of storage units to be consistent with typical develoment
a sq ft = square feet, pump = vehicle fueling position(VFA), room = available hotel room
5 Some land use codes have changed, values in parentheses represent prior fee schedule land use codes
Discussion
Spokane
,Valley
Consensus to proceed
with the first reading of
an Ordinance adopting
the Rate Study
updates.
I Take other action
deemed appropriate.
7
71/
z
°Mirabeau
Subarea:
m
‘Fi
` (4 $698/Trip
See Master,
��.. Mai sleaeAve c of
CT ! Indiana A
N-Pines Rd -�J
Suba"re'a:Ve
32701444 $2,195/Trip
See Master
eroa0Fee�Schedule
S ra ue Ave
-1I
214i Ave.
1fith Ave
4th Ave
0
25th
\ Ave
CC
a)
m
o<'
w
24th Ave
r
E
�_
cn
SIi:4r`:. I.
:ejf/2'
NE Industrial
Area PAO: $2,831
Euclid Ave
Fuclid Ave
y
Mission Ave g
S. Barker Corridoo
Impact Fees
1
r' • jit$1,1531Trip
LL
See Maste
Fee Schedule
/.f
Far Ave j
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: March 15, 2022 Department Director Approval:
Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ® admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Administrative report— School Zone Flashing Beacons.
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: N/A
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Prior presentations have been provided to Council in
2009, 2011, 2013, 2014 for the school zone beacon installations. A presentation was provided to Council
in February, 2021 regarding overall crosswalk and beacon policy. On May 4, 2021, Council approved a
motion that staff submit an application to WTSC for the School Zone Flashing Beacon project; which would
enable the potential purchase of school zone flashing beacons to Horizon Middle School, Continuous
Curriculum School, and City School.
BACKGROUND: In the Spring of 2021, City Council requested staff to install a school zone flashing
beacon at all schools identified as candidates by a prior preliminary evaluation. These candidates excluded
schools with existing beacons, high schools, and virtual learning centers. The installation of nine (9)
locations with 18 beacons was included in the 2022 City budget. Staff has moved forward with coordinating
with the affected schools and identifying locations for the beacons for five (5) of the locations. One of
these school locations will require the establishment of new school zones on two streets, which must be by
Council Resolution modifying the City's Master Speed Limit Schedule. The remaining four (4) school
locations are not recommended for installation at this time. Generally, these four (4) locations have either
been modified to uses that do not allow for, or expect walking to school by students, or do not have adjacent
streets on which to effectively install the flashing beacons.
OPTIONS:
1) Proceed to a Resolution to establish school zones on Tschirley Road north of Sprague Avenue and
Corbin Road north of Appleway Avenue with only five school zone beacon pair installations.
2) Proceed to a Resolution to establish school zones on Tschirley Road north of Sprague Avenue and
Corbin Road north of Appleway Avenue with nine school zone beacon pair installations
3) Take other appropriate action.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION:
Seeking Council consensus to:
• Proceed to a Resolution establishing school zones on Tschirley Road north of Sprague Avenue and
Corbin Road north of Appleway Avenue with five school zone beacon pair installations.
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: The 2022 budget currently includes $225,000 for installation of
school zone beacons. Moving forward with only five school zone beacon pair installations would result in
the expenditure of approximately $125,000.
STAFF CONTACT: Bill Helbig, Community & Public Works Director; Jerremy Clark, Traffic
Engineering Manager.
ATTACHMENTS: PowerPoint Presentation
School Zone Flashing Beacons
-""
Bill Helbig, Community & Public Works Director
Jerremy Clark, Traffic Engineering Manager
2
Prior Discussions —February, 2021
Spokane
Valley
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
■ Discussion
Types of Devices Used by the City
n Device Selection Process
■ Typical Enhancements for Crosswalks
• Next Steps
Allocate budget to install School Zone Flashing Beacons at every eligible school
9 Locations identified without beacons
18 new beacons included in 2022 budget
School Zone Flashing Beacons — 2022
Spokane
Valley
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
9 Locations identified without beacons
Excluded high schools, virtual learning centers
m 18 new beacons included in the budget
Preliminary Engineering (PE) is underway
• 5 primary locations identified (green)
• 4 locations not recommended at this time (yellow)
DISTRICT
NAME
STATUS
CVSD
Greenacres Elementary
Moving Forward
Greenacres Middle School
Need to adopt school zone by resolution**
Spokane Valley Learning Academy
Home Based Learning, discuss need
Sunrise Elementary
Moving Forward
EVSD
Trent Elementary
Strictly bussing and drop-off school, no walking without parent authorization.
WVSD
Centennial Middle School
Moving Forward
Early Learning Center
Moving Forward
Ness Elementary
Broadway is the walk boundary line, no walking usage expected
District 81
Pratt Elementary
This school has been converted to a choice -in high school in the Spokane school district.
School Zone Flashing Beacons 2022
OF
Spokane
111,1
Spokane Valley
Learning Academy
Southeast corner
of Barker/Mission
CVSD I Spokane Valley Learning Academy I Home Based Learning, discuss need
School Zone Flashing Beacons — 2022
Spokane
Valley
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Trent Elementary
Pines Road / SR-27
north of Mirabeau
Parkway
EVSD
Trent Elementary
Strictly bussing and drop-off school, no walking without parent authorization.
School Zone Flashing Beacons — 2022
Spokane
�sValley
Ness Elementary
N. of Broadway
between Locust
and Woodruff
Ness Elementary
Broadway is the walk boundary line, no walking usage expected
School Zone Flashing Beacons — 2022
Spokane
�sValley
Pratt Elementary
(Pratt Academy)
4th Ave between
Bradley and
Coleman
Pratt Elementary
This school has been converted to a choice -in high school in the Spokane school district.
Discussion
Spokane
,.Valley
Consensus to move forward to Council Resolution modifying
the City's Master Speed Limit Schedule with the establishment
of two new school zones and at Greenacres Middle School.
Consensus to reduce number of installations budgeted.
Take other action deemed appropriate.
Questions?
9
Existing Installations
Spokane
,.Valley
EXISTING FLASHING BEACONS
N
1 O .
U
r 0aco* 5
4th 3rd
8th c
1 E
Knox
1
ti .CMirabeau
a.n--Mansfield
-o
x
.
a APp;ev Y_ ii
y' -f 4th
i 11_
o - .AC •y Ni
1
16th �§ = 9 16th
1
.1•-•ii
BEACON TYPE
O Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon (RRFB)
Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon (PHB)
0 School Zone Flashing Beacon (SZFB)
Mission
_o
YL
Euclid
V''
Euclid'+
4
u
L
3
r T
• -
=7L,
%. ' 24th ,l
,
`m
, a
``- . 32nd
25th Po
-i;
y
A
� Y
Dale , 2.*2021
�GrtO�♦
P Valley
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: March 15, 2022 Department Director Approval:
Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ® admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Admin Report: Potential Grant Opportunity - Washington Recreation
Conservation Office (RCO)
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: N/A.
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: November 12, 2019 approval of 2019 Spokane Valley
Parks and Recreation Master Plan Update.
BACKGROUND: Washington State Recreation & Conservation Office (RCO) grant programs
operate on a two-year cycle with current funding opportunities now open for applications.
Successful applicants are awarded funding in the subsequent year and generally provided a
two-year timeline for project completion. Staff will provide an overview of two RCO grant
programs that could be used for Balfour Park Phase 2 construction, including grant limits, local
match requirements, application deadlines, and funding award timelines. Any funding requested
from RCO this year, if awarded, would not become available before July of 2023 with
construction anticipated to occur in 2024. The next two-year RCO grant funding cycle will likely
open in 2024 for 2026 construction.
The City currently has Balfour Park Phase 1 construction documents out for bid with bid
openings scheduled for Friday, March 18th and Phase 1 construction planned for this year.
Phase 1 Balfour Park improvements will include major grading, utilities, parking, park pathways,
some lighting and landscaping, artwork, and a new restroom/park utilities building with police
field office (and optional bid additives for an events plaza, veterans memorial, and play
equipment). Future Balfour Park elements include a splashpad, signature playground,
basketball and pickleball courts, amphitheater with covered stage, a large picnic shelter and
additional artwork.
Staff is seeking Council consensus on whether to move forward with putting together
applications for grant funding through two RCO programs: Washington Wildlife and Recreation
(WWRP) Local Parks; and Land and Water Conservation Fund (LWCF). If authorized, staff will
return with a detailed project presentation and request for application approvals via City Council
approved Resolution prior to May 3, 2022.
OPTIONS: (1) Authorize staff to pursue the two above -mentioned RCO grants during the
current 2022 application window; or (2) take other action as appropriate
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Council discretion.
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Depending on project budget the City has the potential to
request up to $2.5M in Balfour Park Phase 2 development funding through the RCO.
STAFF CONTACT: John Bottelli, Parks, Recreation & Facilities Director
ATTACHMENTS: PowerPoint Presentation
1
Potential Grant
Opportunity:
Balfour Park Phase 2
WASHINGTON STATE RECREATION AND CONSERVATION OFFICE (RCO)
Natural Areas
Water Access
Grant Programs Overview
r
• Aquatic Lands Enhancement Account (ALEA)
• Boating Infrastructure Grant (BIG)
• Community Forests Program (CFP)
• Land and Water Conservation Fund (LWCF)
• Washington Wildlife and Recreation Program (WWRP)
• Youth Athletic Facilities (YAF)
• Boating Facilities Program (BFP)
• Firearms and Archery Range Recreation (FARR)
• No Child Left Inside (NCLI)
• Nonhighway and Off -Road Vehicle Activities (NOVA)
• Recreational Trails Program (RTP)
3
Project Implementation
Receive Funding
in July 2023
(earliest)
Before
Construction:
• Contract executed
with RCO
• Cultural resources
reviews are complete
A
Complete project
within 2-3 years
Matching Share
WWRP -Local Parks and
Land & Water Conservation Fund
WWRP
Grant Limit: $500,000
Match Required: 50% *
Can include LWCF grant
Eligible Projects:
Sport courts
ail« Picnic shelters
Play areas
Iuu Spray parks
l�m,e Open areas
* Spokane Valley may qualify for a match reduction of 10%
LWCF
Grant Limit: $2,000,000
Match Required: 50%
r�f9 Can include WWRP grant
Eligible Projects:
4i Sport courts
rrPicnic shelters
Play areas
Spray parks
Open areas
6
Example Funding Scenario
To obtain $2.5M the City would need to
provide at least $1.5M in match
$1,500,000
$500,000
0 LWCF 0 WWRP
$2,000,000
CoSV
7
Timeline:
• Application requires Legislative
Approval from City Council
• June 8-10 - Technical Review
• July 19 - Technical Completion
• October 25-26 - RCO Funding Board
Approves Preliminary Ranked Lists
• June 30, 2023 - Board Awards Grants
8
Balfour
Park
Phases
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: March 15, 2022 Department Director Approval:
Check all that apply: ❑ consent
❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ® admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Administrative report — Discussion regarding parking regulations and
enforcement on public rights -of -way.
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 46.61.570; WAC 308-330-462; WAC 308-330-265; WAC 308-
330-270; chapter 46.55 RCW; chapter 9.05 SVMC.
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: March 6, 2003 adoption of the Model Traffic Ordinance
(MTO), later codified as chapter 9.05 SVMC; October 24, 2006 amended MTO relating to establishing
speed limits; March 24, 2009 amended MTO relating to establishing speed limits; February 16, 2021
administrative report on parking issues on residential streets; March 16, 2021 administrative report on
parking issues on residential streets; and April 13, 2021 administrative report on parking issues, including
discussion on authority to establish areas in the City where parking is prohibited; October 19, 2021
administrative report on authority to impose parking prohibitions.
BACKGROUND: In Council meetings throughout 2021, the City received citizen comments relating to
parking issues in certain areas, primarily in residentially zoned areas. At the October 19, 2021 meeting,
Council stated that it wanted to clarify the respective responsibility between Council and staff for the
establishment of site -specific parking prohibitions. Staff would be responsible for certain traffic safety
prohibitions and Council would be responsible for identifying areas where parking is prohibited based on
public policy criteria. Council has also expressed a desire to obtain a full inventory of posted signs
restricting or prohibiting parking in the City. The City has received the raw data and is in the process of
converting that into the Master Parking Prohibition Schedule for future discussion and adoption.
The attached draft ordinance identifies the authority staff would have, and what authority Council would
have in establishing parking prohibitions on public rights -of -way. Additionally, Council requested a
proposal to regulate parking in several other ways, specifically regarding parking of junk vehicles and
parking in a manner that blocks access to mailboxes. In drafting these provisions, it seemed prudent to also
include a prohibition on parking vehicles with registrations that are expired for more than 45 days.
There is a provision in state law that allows law enforcement to consider an otherwise legally parked vehicle
with no condition defects as being "unauthorized" and tagged for impoundment after 24 hours, simply
because it has been there at least 24 hours. This has happened on occasion by SCOPE over the years,
although typically they will delay impoundment for several days to try to contact the owner of the vehicle
(typically adjoining residence). The concern with this is if someone goes on vacation, or is out of town to
work on a temporary job, they could come back to a missing vehicle that has been impounded from in front
of their house, with significant fees imposed to redeem the vehicle. Draft language has been included to
require a longer period of time before such a 24-hour notice sticker can be applied. For example, would
Council want a 10-day period, or 14 days, etc.
In addition to the parking prohibitions, the draft code contains a fine, but does not identify an amount. Our
research indicates a pretty standard amount for parking violations in other cities is $30 per violation (one
day per violation, unless it is a parking meter, which can have multiple fines in a day). The amount of the
fine would be Council's decision and would ultimately be included in the City's master fee schedule.
As Council knows, regulations are only as effective as the enforcement mechanisms and personnel
supporting them. Staff and Chief Ellis will discuss how parking in the City is currently enforced, and what
may be necessary moving forward if the new parking prohibition code provisions are adopted.
Staff also intends to discuss several related parking issues, including the impact of a recent decision from
the state Supreme Court that affects how the City addresses vehicle impounds.
Staff is looking for policy direction from Council on how to proceed with the draft code provisions.
OPTIONS: (1) Schedule additional discussions regarding enforcement options; or (2) take other action as
appropriate.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: None at this time, staff will schedule future discussions
regarding enforcement options.
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Unknown.
STAFF CONTACT: Cary Driskell, City Attorney; Jerremy Clark, Traffic Engineering Manager; Dave
Ellis, Police Chief.
ATTACHMENTS:
A —PowerPoint presentation; and
B — Draft Ordinance adopting chapter 9.40 SVMC
"NO PARKING" REGULATIONS AND
PARKING ENFORCEMENT
Cary Driskell
City Attorney, City of Spokane Valley
Chief Dave Ellis
Spokane Valley Police Chief
Jerremy Clark
Traffic Engineering Manager, City of Spokane Valley
March 8, 2022
City of Spokane Valley - Office of the City Attorney
i
Background
City Council discussion on October 19, 2021
Discussion of collecting and cataloging "no -parking" sign inventory - ongoing
Moving forward - three options discussed
• City Council consensus on "hybrid approach"
Traffic engineer exercise limited authority granted by Council under the Model Traffic
Ordinance
Council would grant itself broad authority to determine when to add or remove "no -
parking" zones in other instances
City of Spokane Valley - Office of the City Attorney 2
Proposed Code —Traffic engineer authority
9.40.010- Identifies the authority for the Traffic Engineer to adopt
parking prohibitions in limited circumstances pursuant to WAC 308-330265(n-13)
-
Further states that any areas so prohibited by the Traffic Engineer shall be
included in a Master Parking Prohibition Schedule adopted by Council
resolution.
City of Spokane Valley - Office of the City Attorney
3
Proposed Code —Council authority
9.40.020 - Identifies the authority for the Council to establish other site -specific
areas where parking is prohibited.
Any areas so identified by Council shall be included in the Master Parking
Prohibition Schedule adopted by Council.
9.4o.o2o(A) identifies suggested factors when Council is considering whether to
limit parking in a specific area.
9.4o.o2o(A) identifies that Council shall in its analysis consider (but is not
bound by) a traffic engineering report relating to that vicinity.
City of Spokane Valley - Office of the City Attorney
4
Prizsed Code —Master Paring Prohibition
Schedule - Violations
9.40.o3o(A) identifies that it is a violation to stop, stand, or park a vehicle
within a site -specific no -parking zone in violation of the Master Parking
Prohibition Schedule.
9.40.o3o(B) states that it is not a violation while picking up/dropping off
passenger or at the direction of LE or an official traffic control device.
9.4o.o3o(C) states that a violation that continues for (*) days is subject to
impoundment.
9.40.o3o(D) states that a fine applies in addition to impoundment.
9.40.o3o(E) states that state law impoundment rules apply.
City of Spokane Valley - Office of the City Attorney
5
dgaggisea
Proposed Code — Other specific violations
9.4o. o4o (A) - Identifies that it is a violation to stop, stand, or park a
vehicle within a site -specific no -parking zone in three identified ways:
9.40. 040 (A) (1) - On public ROW when it meets the City definition of a junk
vehicle, even if it is subsequently moved to another place on public ROW.
• "Junk vehicle" means a vehicle meeting at least three of the following criteria:
1. Is three years old or older;
2. Is extensively damaged, such damage including but not limited to any of the
following: a broken window or windshield, or missing wheels, tires, motor, or
transmission;
3. Is apparently inoperable;
4. Has an approximate fair market value equal only to the approximate value of the scrap
in it.
City of Spokane Valley - Office of the City Attorney 6
Proposed Code — Specific violations (cont.)
• 9.40.o4o(A)(2) - When a vehicle is on public ROW and has an expired
registration of more than 45 days, even if it is subsequently moved to another
place on public ROW.
• 9.40.o4o(A)(3) -Within 15 feet of any United State Postal Service mailbox,
except when in the act of delivering mail or while actively picking up or
dropping off a passenger(s).
City of Spokane Valley - Office of the City Attorney
7
Proposed Code —Specific violations (cont.)
9.40.o4o(B) states that it is not a violation while picking up/dropping off
passenger or at the direction of LE or an official traffic control device.
9.40.o4o(C) states that a violation subjects the vehicle to impound 24
hours after a notice is put on the vehicle if the vehicle is not removed.
9.40.o4o(D) states that a fine applies in addition to impoundment.
9.40.o4o(E) states that state law impoundment rules apply.
City of Spokane Valley - Office of the City Attorney 8
Proposed Code Time limits —lawful vehicles
This would cover general parking of lawful vehicles on public ROW.
9.40.o5o(A) identifies that it is a violation to stop, stand, or park a vehicle
for more than (*) days, after which, it can be impounded.
It is important for Council to know that the default under state law is 24
hours, which seems awfully short for an otherwise legal vehicle not
constituting a traffic safety hazard. Does Council want something longer?
• For example, if you were on vacation for a week or two with your car parked
on the street in front of your house, it could be impounded.
• Council likely needs to balance this scenario against having public streets
used for long-term storage.
City of Spokane Valley - Office of the City Attorney
9
Proposed Code
Time limits (cont.)
9.40.o5o(B) states that it is not a violation while picking up/dropping off
passenger or at the direction of LE or an official traffic control device.
9.4o.o5o(C) states that once the time period in (A) expires (whatever time
period Council decides), then the vehicles is subject to impoundment
after 24 hours.
9.40.o5o(D) states that a fine applies in addition to impoundment.
9.40.o5o(E) states that state law impoundment rules apply.
City of Spokane Valley - Office of the City Attorney io
Proposed Code - Fines
SVMC 9.4o.o60 - states that in addition to impoundment, a vehicle is
subject to a fine.
Each day would be a separate violation.
The amount is not identified in this draft, but $3o per violation appears to
be pretty standard for these types of parking violations for most cities.
We would need to identify whether this was a civil infraction or a non-
moving vehicular violation.
We would need to determine if the fine would be collected by District
Court or by City staff.
City of Spokane Valley - Office of the City Attorney ii
Parking Enforcement
Codes are only as effective as enforcement
So how does parking enforcement occur in Spokane Valley?
City of Spokane Valley - Office of the City Attorney
ParTng ' Enforcement
Parking complaints primarily go to SREC or Crime Check
Code enforcement refers parking complaints to SVPD/SCOPE
Primary response is currently from Sheriff Community
Policing Effort (SCOPE)
• Parking is just one of their programs
What is SCOPE?
Volunteers
Operated under Sheriff (not under Spokane Valley Police)
Limited Commission (allows issuance of parking infractions)
City of Spokane Valley - Office of the City Attorney i3
40,
Parking Enforcement
SCOPE parking enforcement
Generally three dedicated volunteers
• Operates two days per week for abandoned and junk vehicle
complaints
• Issue parking infractions
• Tag vehicles for towing - abandoned vehicles; hulk (junk) vehicles
Complaint driven
City of Spokane Valley - Office of the City Attorney i4
Parking Enforcement
Parking Calls - SV CAD system information for 2021
(combined patrol and SCOPE)
• 912 abandoned vehicle calls
• ii6 hulk slip (junk vehicle) calls
233 Parking violation calls
City of Spokane Valley - Office of the City Attorney i5
Parklg Enforcement
Towing issues - City of Seattle v. Long, 198 Wn.2d 136 (2021)
• Vehicles being lived in as principal residence implicates Homestead Act and
8th Amendment
Homestead Act - protection for debtors against creditors taking principal
residence
• May still tow
• Cannot place lien on vehicle or auction for sale
8th Amendment - Excessive fine/cruel punishment
• Must be penalty - court found towing fees can be penal in nature
Cannot be excessive
Ability to pay is a consideration
City of Spokane Valley - Office of the City Attorney i6
Parklg Enforcement -
Ability to tow?
Yes - may still tow, regardless of whether it is principal residence
• Traffic safety issues; public health and safety issues
Cannot force sale and any fees/fines may be considered excessive if owner
has no ability to pay
One option is to tow and hold, with no cost to owner to retrieve
• City of Spokane - tows for standard violations of rules of road related to
parking
Likely requires separate contract by City to ensure vehicles not
inadvertently auctioned when they are principal residence
• Staff working to set up contract currently
City of Spokane Valley - Office of the City Attorney i7
Next Steps
Consensus to bring proposed code forward for first reading?
Additional discussion on enforcement options?
City of Spokane Valley - Office of the City Attorney
DRAFT
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO.22-***
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY,
WASHINGTON, ADOPTING A NEW CHAPTER 9.40 OF THE SPOKANE
VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO PARKING PROHIBITIONS, AND
OTHER MATTERS RELATING THERETO
WHEREAS, pursuant to chapter 9.05 SVMC, the City has adopted the Washington Model
Traffic Ordinance, Chapter 308-330 WAC, as the traffic code of the City of Spokane Valley, which
authorizes the City Council and the Traffic Engineer to determine and designate site -specific parking
prohibitions in the City; and
WHEREAS, the City Council now desires to identify all previously -adopted site -specific parking
prohibitions applicable on City roads in a format that is more accessible and easier to use for the public.
The new format is referred to as the "Master Parking Prohibition Schedule," and may be amended
periodically pursuant to criteria in City Code and Washington law; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has authority pursuant to RCW 46.61.570 and WAC 308-330-270
to establish general and site -specific parking prohibitions, which is an exercise of power of the City to
protect the health, safety, and welfare of its citizens; and
WHEREAS, RCW 46.61.570 currently contains many specific prohibitions or limitations on
where and when people may park on public rights -of -way. City Council now desires to establish
additional site -specific parking prohibitions beyond those that are statutory for reasons of public policy,
efficiency, or convenience, and to create appropriate criteria for the establishment of the same; and
WHEREAS, the Senior Traffic Engineer has conducted or will conduct an engineering and
traffic investigation for all proposed changes to site -specific parking prohibitions pursuant to WAC 308-
330-270; and
WHEREAS, the Senior Traffic Engineer has authority pursuant to WAC 308-330-265(11-13) to
determine and designate site -specific parking prohibitions in certain circumstances and maintain and erect
signs and signals indicating the same in order to enhance safe and efficient movement of traffic; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has authority pursuant to RCW 46.55.240 to adopt ordinances
concerning authorized, abandoned, or impounded vehicles, authorize impoundment upon the public right-
of-way, and establish a written form of authorization to impound, including but not limited to a law
enforcement notice of infraction or citation; and
WHEREAS, City Council further desires to adopt and implement parking restrictions relating to
parking in a manner that interferes with delivery by the United States Postal Service on public rights -of -
way; and
WHEREAS, City Council further desires to adopt and implement parking regulations relating to
the duration of time vehicles may park on public rights -of -way.
NOW THEREFORE the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley, Spokane County,
Washington, ordains as follows:
-1-
DRAFT
Section 1. Purpose. The purpose of this Ordinance is to adopt chapter 9.40 SVMC to
establish general and site -specific parking prohibitions in the City, and creation of a Master Parking
Prohibition Schedule.
Section 2. Spokane Valley Municipal Code Chapter 9.40 is hereby adopted as follows:
Chapter 9.40 PARKING PROHIBITIONS.
SVMC 9.40.005. Definitions.
The definitions in Title 46 RCW shall apply to chapter 9.40 SVMC unless otherwise specifically
identified within this chapter.
SVMC 9.40.010. Traffic Engineer Authority to Establish Site -Specific Parking Prohibitions.
A. Pursuant to WAC 308-330-265(11-13), the traffic engineer may establish, amend, or repeal
site -specific parking prohibitions on public streets and highways pursuant to specified, limited
circumstances in the interest of public safety. Site -specific parking prohibitions shall be
appropriately marked and maintained pursuant to WAC 308-330-409.
B. All site -specific parking prohibitions adopted pursuant to SVMC 9.40.010(A) shall be
maintained in the Master Parking Prohibition Schedule, Subsection A: Site -Specific Parking
Prohibitions —Traffic Engineer.
SVMC 9.40.020. City Council Authority to Establish Site -Specific Parking Prohibitions.
A. City Council may, by resolution and following consideration of a report by the traffic engineer
establish, amend, or repeal site -specific parking prohibitions adopted pursuant to SVMC
9.40.020, which shall be appropriately marked and maintained pursuant to WAC 308-330-409.
When determining whether to establish, amend, or repeal site -specific parking prohibitions, City
Council may consider at least the factors including the following:
1. The relationship between the need for parking spaces for adjacent land uses, the
purpose of the parking prohibition, and the need for parking spaces for the general public;
2. The interests of property owners, patrons, and prospective patrons of the places within
the block or area served by the parking prohibition;
3. A detailed strip map of the area showing any State Route Mileposts (SR/MP),
intersecting streets, and driveways, and other on -street or off-street parking alternatives;
4. Photos or video if available; and
5. The type of parking prohibition contemplated.
B. When determining whether to establish, amend, or repeal site -specific parking prohibitions,
City Council shall consider the report by the traffic engineer pursuant to SVMC 9.40.020(A),
which shall include analysis of the following in the vicinity:
-2-
DRAFT
1. The volume of traffic;
2. The volume of parking;
3. The width of the surface street and unimproved right-of-way;
4. Operational conditions identifying need for regulation of parked vehicles, including:
a. Narrow shoulders,
b. Limited sight distances,
c. Roadway speed limit.
d. Reported crashes susceptible to correction by parking restrictions; and
5. Comments by the City's Police Chief or designee and from the applicable Fire District.
C. All site -specific parking prohibitions adopted pursuant to SVMC 9.40.020(A) shall be
maintained in the Master Parking Prohibition Schedule, Subsection B: Site -Specific Parking
Prohibitions —City Council.
SVMC 9.40.030. Site -specific parking prohibitions in violation of Master Parking Prohibition Schedule.
A. No person shall stop, stand, or park a vehicle within any site -specific no -parking zone listed in
the Master Parking Prohibition Schedule.
B. It is not a violation of SVMC 9.40.030(A) to stop, stand, or park a vehicle when necessary to
avoid conflict with other traffic, when actively picking up or dropping off a passenger(s), or in
compliance with the law, directions of a police officer, or official traffic control device.
C. If a vehicle remains stopped, standing, or parked in violation of SVMC 9.40.030(A) for (*)
days after the original notice of violation and fine, the vehicle is subject to impoundment pursuant
to RCW 46.55.085.
D. In addition to potential impoundment, vehicles stopped, standing, or parked in violation of
SVMC 9.40.030(A) are subject to the fine pursuant to SVMC 9.40.060.
E. All impoundment procedures for SVMC 9.40.030 shall be governed by chapter 46.55 RCW.
SVMC 9.40.040. Other parking prohibitions.
A. No person shall stop, stand, or park a vehicle:
1. On a public right-of-way when that vehicle meets the definition of a junk vehicle
pursuant to SVMC 7.05.020, regardless of whether the vehicle is subsequently moved to
another area of public right-of-way.
2. When that vehicle is parked on a public street and has an expired registration of more
than 45 days pursuant to RCW 46.55.113, regardless of whether the vehicle is
subsequently moved to another area of public right-of-way.
- 3 -
DRAFT
3. Within 15 feet of any United State Postal Service mailbox, except when in the act of
delivering mail or while actively picking up or dropping off a passenger(s).
B. It is not a violation of SVMC 9.40.040(A) to stop, stand, or park a vehicle when necessary to
avoid conflict with other traffic, or in compliance with the law, directions of a police officer, or
official traffic control device.
C. Vehicles stopped, standing, or parked in violation of SVMC 9.40.040(A) are unauthorized
vehicles subject to impoundment 24 hours after notice is posted on the vehicle pursuant to RCW
46.55.085.
D. In addition to potential impoundment, vehicles stopped, standing, or parked in violation of
SVMC 9.40.040(A) are subject to the fine pursuant to SVMC 9.40.060.
E. All impoundment procedures for SVMC 9.40.040 shall be governed by chapter 46.55 RCW.
SVMC 9.40.050. Parking prohibitions —subject to impoundment after (*) days.
A. No person shall stop, stand, or park a vehicle on a public right-of-way for more than (*)
consecutive days pursuant to RCW 46.61.570(2), after which notice may be posted on the vehicle
pursuant to RCW 46.55.085 for any vehicle not otherwise constituting a violation of applicable
state law, SVMC 9.40.030, or SVMC 9.40.040.
B. It is not a violation of SVMC 9.40.050(A) to stop, stand, or park a vehicle when necessary to
avoid conflict with other traffic, or in compliance with the law or directions of a police officer or
official traffic control device.
C. Vehicles stopped, standing, or parked in violation of SVMC 9.40.050(A) are unauthorized
vehicles subject to impoundment 24 hours after notice is posted on the vehicle pursuant to RCW
46.55.085.
D. In addition to potential impoundment, vehicles stopped, standing, or parked in violation of
SVMC 9.40.050(A) are subject to the fine pursuant to SVMC 9.40.060.
E. All impoundment procedures for SVMC 9.40.050 shall be governed by chapter 46.55 RCW.
SVMC 9.40.060. Parking prohibitions —fines.
A. In addition to potential impoundment, vehicles stopped, standing, or parked in violation of
chapter 9.40 SVMC are subject to a fine of ($) dollars per day.
B. Notice of each fine that is assessed pursuant to chapter 9.40 SVMC shall be posted on the
vehicle, and shall include:
1. The date of the original notice of violation and fine.
2. The date of the current notice of violation and fine.
3. A warning that the vehicle may be impounded if it is not moved by the (*th) day after
the original notice of violation and fine.
-4-
DRAFT
4. The assessment of the ($) fine, payable to the City of Spokane Valley (PAYABLE TO
CITY? COURT?).
5. Contact information for the City of Spokane Valley.
6. Information concerning an opportunity to appeal the assessment of violation and fine.
Section 3. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause, or phrase of this Ordinance should
be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or
unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or
phrase of this Ordinance.
Section 4. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective five days after publication
of the ordinance, or a summary thereof, in the official newspaper of the City.
Adopted this
day of , 2022.
ATTEST: CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Pam Haley, Mayor
Approved as to Form:
Office of the City Attorney
Date of Publication:
Effective Date:
- 5 -
DRAFT
ADVANCE AGENDA
as of March 10, 2022; 9:00 a.m.
Please note this is a work in progress; items are tentative
To: Council & Staff
From: City Clerk, by direction of City Manager
Re: Draft Schedule for Upcoming Council Meetings
March 22, 2022, Formal Meeting, 6:00 p.m. [due Tue March 15]
1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) (5 minutes)
2. First Reading Ordinance 22-005 Approving Updated Transportation Impact Fee Rate Studies— Jerremy Clark(10 mins)
3. Resolution 22-003 Amending Master Speed limit schedule — Jerremy Clark
4. Admin Report: Sullivan/Trent Project Update — Bill Helbig
5. Homeless Housing & Assistance Act (HHAA) Funds — Erik Lamb
6. Admin Report: Advance Agenda — Mayor Haley
7. Info Only: Department Monthly Reports
8. Executive Session: Pending/Potential Litigation
(10 minutes)
(15 minutes)
(30 minutes)
(5 minutes)
[*estimated meeting: 75 mins]
March 29, 2022, Study Session, 6:00 p.m. [due Tue March 22]
Proclamation: Vietnam War Veterans Day
ACTION ITEMS:
1. Second Reading Ordinance 22-005 Approving Updated Transportation Impact Fee Rate Studies—.J.Clark (10 minutes)
2. Resolution 22-004 Amending Master Fee Schedule, Transportation Impact Fees — Chelsie Taylor (10 minutes)
3. Motion Consideration: Bid Award, Balfour Park Expansion Project — Gloria Mantz (10 minutes)
4. Motion Consideration: Interlocal Agreement, Spokane County Parklets — Cary Driskell (10 minutes)
NON -ACTION ITEMS;
5. Private Parking — Jenny Nickerson
6. Advance Agenda — Mayor Haley
(20 minutes)
(5 minutes)
[*estimated meeting: 65 mins]
April 5, 2022, Study Session, 6:00 p.m. [due Tue March 29]
1. Advance Agenda — Mayor Haley (5 minutes)
April 12, 2022, Formal Meeting, 6:00 p.m.
1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes)
2. Admin Report: Advance Agenda — Mayor Haley
April 19, 2022, Study Session, 6:00 p.m.
1. Pavement preservation Program — Bill Helbig, Adam Jackson
2. Advance Agenda — Mayor Haley
April 26, 2022, Formal Meeting, 6:00 p.m.
1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes)
2. Admin Report: Legislative Session Update — John Hohman, Briahna Murray
3. Admin Report: Advance Agenda — Mayor Haley
4. Info Only: Department Monthly Reports
May 3, 2022, Study Session, 6:00 p.m.
1. 2022 Budget Amendment — Chelsie Taylor
2. Advance Agenda — Mayor Haley
May 10, 2022, Formal Meeting, 6:00 p.m.
1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes)
2. Admin Report: Advance Agenda — Mayor Haley
[due Tue April 5]
(5 minutes)
(5 minutes)
[due Tue April 12]
(15 minutes)
(5 minutes)
[due Tue April 19]
(5 minutes)
(30 minutes)
(5 minutes)
[*estimated meeting: 40 mins]
[due Tue April 26]
(10 minutes)
(5 minutes)
[due Tue May 3]
(5 minutes)
(5 minutes)
Draft Advance Agenda 3/10/2022 1:50:39 PM Page 1 of 2
May 17, 2022, Study Session, 6:00 p.m.
ACTION ITEMS:
1. PUBLIC HEARING: 2022 Budget Amendment — Chelsie Taylor
2. First Reading Ordinance 22- Amending 2022 Budget — Chelsie Taylor
NON -ACTION ITEMS:
3. Advance Agenda — Mayor Haley
May 24, 2022, Formal Meeting, 6:00 p.m.
1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes)
2. Admin Report: Advance Agenda — Mayor Haley
3. Info Only: Department Monthly Reports
May 31, 2022, Study Session, 6:00 p.m.
ACTION ITEMS:
1. Second Reading Ordinance 22- Amending 2022 Budget — Chelsie Taylor
NON -ACTION ITEMS:
2. Advance Agenda — Mayor Haley
June 7, 2022, Study Session, 6:00 p.m.
1. 6-year TIP — Adam Jackson
2. Advance Agenda — Mayor Haley
June 14, 2022, Special Meeting: Budget Workshop 8:30 a.m.
June 14, 2022, Formal Meeting, 6:00 p.m. — Meeting Cancelled
June 21, 2022, Study Session, 6:00 p.m.
1. Advance Agenda — Mayor Haley
June 28, 2022, Formal Meeting, 6:00 p.m.
1. PUBLIC HEARING: 6-year TIP — Adam Jackson
2. Resolution 22-_ Adopting TIP — Adam Jackson
3. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes)
4. Admin Report: Advance Agenda — Mayor Haley
5. Info Only: Department Monthly Reports
July 5, 2022, Study Session, 6:00 p.m.
1. Advance Agenda — Mayor Haley
July 12, 2022, Formal Meeting, 6:00 p.m.
1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes)
2. Admin Report: Advance Agenda — Mayor Haley
*time for public or Council comments not included
OTHER PENDING AND/OR UPCOMING
Appleway Trail Amenities
Artwork & Metal Boxes
Avista Stadium
Basement space
CDBG Interlocal
City Lobby circulars/brochures etc.
Consolidated Homeless Grant
Continuum of Care (possible info item)
Core Beliefs Resolution
Governor Auth. Emergencies (info only)
Greenacres Park
Mirabeau Vacant Parcel
ISSUES/MEETINGS:
[due Tue May 10]
(15 minutes)
(10 minutes)
(5 minutes)
[due Tue May 17]
(5 minutes)
(5 minutes)
[due Tue May 24]
(10 minutes)
(5 minutes)
[due Tue May 31]
(10 minutes)
(5 minutes)
[due Tue June 7]
[due Tue June 14]
(5 minutes)
[due Tue June 21]
(5 minutes)
(10 minutes)
(5 minutes)
(5 minutes)
[due Tue June 28]
(5 minutes)
[due Tue July 5]
(5 minutes)
(5 minutes)
Mirabeau Park Forestry Mgmt.
Neighborhood Restoration
Park Lighting
PFD Presentation
Prosecutor Services
Residency
Senior Center Agreement
St. Illumination (owners, cost, location)
St. O&M Pavement Preservation
Vehicle Wgt Infrastructure Impact
Water Districts & Green Space
Way Finding Signs
Draft Advance Agenda 3/10/2022 1:50:39 PM Page 2 of 2
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: March 15, 2022 Department Director Approval:
Check all that apply: ❑ consent
❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
® information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: 2022 Salary Commission Final Report.
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 35.21.015; chapter 2.10 SVMC.
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: November 16, 2021 administrative report on history and
process of the Spokane Valley Salary Commission, December 18, 2021 Council consensus to convene a
2022 Salary Commission; January 18, 2022 Mayoral appointment, Council confirmation of the 2022 Salary
Commission members and one alternate; January 25, 2022 administrative report regarding process
underway.
BACKGROUND: On January 18, 2022, Council appointed the 2022 Salary Commission to assess the
current salary of Councilmembers and determine whether a salary adjustment would be warranted.
Attached is the Final Report of the 2022 Independent Salary Commission. The salaries identified herein
shall become effective 30 days after the second publication of a summary of the Final Report in the official
newspaper of the City, anticipated to be March 18, 2022, unless a valid referendum petition is filed within
the 30 day time period. The current monthly salary for the Mayor is $1,775, and for Councilmembers is
$1,415. The new salaries would be $2,250 for the Mayor, and $1800 for Councilmembers.
The 2022 Independent Salary Commission did a thorough analysis, which is contained in their Final Report.
As was done by the 2018 Salary Commission, the 2022 Salary Commission also recommends Council
convene a salary commission every three years to keep the salaries current.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Council is prohibited from taking action on this matter
because the Salary Commission is independent pursuant to Washington state law.
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Once effective, the annual increase of all Council salaries will be
$33,420 ($5,700 additional to Mayor annually; $4,620 additional per Councilmember, total of $27,720 for
remaining six). We also anticipate related payroll taxes will increase by approximately $4,400
annually. Because this increase was not contemplated through the 2022 Budget development process, staff
will bring forward a future 2022 Budget amendment.
STAFF CONTACT: Cary Driskell, City Attorney; Chris Bainbridge, City Clerk; John Whitehead, Human
Resources Director.
ATTACHMENTS: 2022 Independent Salary Commission Final Report.
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
2022 INDEPENDENT SALARY COMMISSION
Final Report: March 3, 2022
Members:
• Dan Allison
• Charles Dowers
O Tes Sturges
o Steven Wareham
o Kathe Williams
• Eric Rieckers (alternate)
Spokane Valley staff support:
• Cary DriskeIl, City Attorney
• Chris Bainbridge, City Clerk
• John Whitehead, Human Resources Director
Introduction
The City of Spokane Valley was incorporated effective March 31, 2003. It has a current population
of approximately 104,000 residents, making it the 9th largest city in the state of Washington. The
Council recently adopted a budget of $107.8 million for 2022.
Spokane Valley operates under a council-manager form of government. The legislative branch is
made up of seven CounciImembers, with the Mayor chosen by his or her fellow Councilmembers
for a two-year appointment. The City Council hires a professional City Manager as its Chief
Executive Officer, who is responsible for the day-to-day administration of the City, carrying out
the policy directives of the City Council.
Setting salaries for Mayor and Councilmembers
Pursuant to state law, upon incorporation of a city of 15,000 or more, the starting salary for council
members is $400, and a councilmember appointed mayor shall be entitled to an additional 25% o.
When the City incorporated, the Mayor received $500 per month, and the Councilmembers
received $400 per month. The Spokane Valley City Council appointed an independent salary
commission in 2006, which filed a report adjusting the salaries for the Mayor to $975 per month,
and to $750 per month for Councilmembers, effective January 17, 2007. Salaries for the Mayor
and Councilmembers were not adjusted between 2006 and January 2019, when the monthly
salaries were again adjusted by the Salary Commission to $1,415 for Councilmembers, and $1,775
for the Mayor. These salaries may only be modified one of two ways.
First, the Council may adopt a salary ordinance establishing the new salary. However, pursuant
to RCW 35A.13.040, "any increase or reduction in the compensation attaching to an office shall
not become effective until the expiration of the term then being served by the incumbent:
PROVIDED That compensation of councilmembers may not be increased or diminished after their
election nor may the compensation of the mayor be increased or diminished after the mayor has
been chosen by the council." As such, for example, a sitting Councilmember would not see
increased pay under this method until the beginning of a second term if that Councilmember chose
to run and was re-elected.
The second way council pay may be adjusted is through the recommendation of a salary
commission. RCW 35.21.015 provides the authority and process by which a city may establish a
salary commission. Under this method, an appointed salary commission undertakes a review of
the council and mayor salaries, analyzes what councilmembers for similarly -situation jurisdictions
are paid, and then makes a written report to the council regarding whether the pay levels should
be adjusted and, if so, to what levels. A summary of the salary commission's report would be
published in the official newspaper of the City two times, at least one week apart, with the second
publication marking the date as the official filing date of the salary schedule. The independent
salary commission's adopted salary schedule may be subject to referendum petition. If there is no
referendum petition filed with the City Clerk within 30 days of that second publication, the salary
adjustment automatically goes into effect without any action of the Council, on the 31st day.
Because the salary adjustment is made by a salary commission, and not the council, this is not
Page 2 of 6
considered an act by the council to perform a mid-term adjustment, and is thus permitted under
Washington state law.
Description of 2022 Independent Salary Commission
On January 18, 2022, the Mayor appointed a five -member (with one alternate) 2022 Independent
Salary Commission, which was confirmed by the City Council. Pursuant to SVMC
2.10.020(A)(2), the "purpose of the independent salary commission shall be to review and
establish the salaries of the Mayor and Councilmembers."
Pursuant to SVMC 2.10.020(A)(7), the first meeting shall occur no later than 20 days after the
appointments are made by the Council, and the Salary Commission shall review, and if it so
determines, amend and file its schedule of salaries for the Mayor and Councilmembers with the
City Clerk within 90 days after being appointed. As such, the first meeting was required to be held
no later than February 7, 2022, and the report of the Salary Commission regarding salary schedules
required is to be submitted no later than close of business on April 18, 2022.
The Salary Commission met on January 25, February 3, February 11, February 24, and March 3,
2022. At its January 25, 2022 meeting, the Salary Commission decided not to elect a Chair and
Vice -Chair but instead requested that City Attorney Cary Driskell facilitate the meetings. The
Salary Commission is submitting this final report establishing a salary schedule for the Spokane
Valley Mayor and Councilmembers on March 3, 2022. Appendix I contains a summary of each
meeting.
The Process
The Salary Commission analyzed salary information for mayors and councilmembers compiled
by the Association of Washington Cities for a number of cities throughout the state. The Salary
Commission narrowed their comparison to the thirty largest cities in the state. Additional analysis
led the Salary Commission to again refine its focus to nine cities that are most similar to Spokane
Valley based on population (comparable range above and below) and council-manager form of
government: Lacey, Olympia, Vancouver, Burien, Richland, Pasco, Kennewick, Kirkland, and
Bellevue. Some of these are located on the cast side of the state, and some on the west side. See
Appendix III for more information on comparables.
The Salary Commission considered three general factors in its analysis:
I . The amount of time Council spent and level of responsibility in performing their
Council duties;
2. A market analysis of salary for mayors and councilmembers in comparable cities
in Washington, set forth in Appendix III; and
3. Citizen survey results, set forth in Appendix II. A majority of survey respondents
indicated support of a salary increase at some level.
As noted above and at the direction of the Salary Commission, a citizen survey was placed on the
City's website with questions regarding various potential salary levels. In addition, the City sent
Page 3 of 6
notice of the survey to its general email list, as well as sending notice on the City's social media
accounts. See Appendix II for a summary of the results of that citizen survey.
Council Roles and Responsibilities
The Salary Commission requested and received information from the Mayor and Councilmembers
regarding how many hours each Councilmember spends, on average, each week attending to City
business. This time included meeting with the public; preparing for weekly Council meetings;
attending weekly Council meetings; preparing for and attending assigned committees within and
outside the City organization that are related to City business; and attending in a representational
capacity various events requiring a City presence. The time commitment is different for each
Councilmember and can change significantly each year for every Councilmember depending on
committee and workload assignments.
Based upon responses from each CounciImember, the average weekly amount of time for all
Councilmembers is approximately 24.5 hours. The average weekly time spent by the Mayor is 35
hours. The Salary Commission discussed that the amount of reported time was down from 2018,
which was 35 for Councilmembers, and 43 for the Mayor. The Salary Commission assumed this
difference was based on the COVID-19 pandemic, that the hours would increase to some extent
over time, but that there is a likely permanent shift relating to conducting remote meetings. Given
these factors, the Salary Commission averaged the hours between those reported in 2018 and 2022
for purposes of its calculations. As such, the average weekly hours for Councilmembers is set at
30 hours and for the Mayor at 39 hours.
There are typically two regular Council meetings and two study sessions per month. These
meetings and study sessions generally last around two hours each. Throughout the year, the
Council also has several special Council meetings on various issues. In addition to the meeting
attendance, the Mayor and Councilmembers prepare for each meeting by reading the material and
following up with staff members as necessary in advance with questions they may have.
In their role as City policymakers, Councilmembers stay informed on issues such as provision of
public safety services (police, courts, prosecution, jail, public defense, probation, etc.); public
infrastructure projects and funding; land use planning and development; economic development;
determining appropriate levels of taxation and spending; labor issues; regional cooperation with
all other jurisdictions (emergency management, regional growth planning, consideration of a new
jail facility, regional transportation, etc.); and regional, state, and federal legislative proposals.
In addition to these regular commitments, Councilmembers represent the City's interests on
various City and regional boards and commissions, such as the Spokane Transit Authority (STA),
the Spokane Regional Transportation Council (SRTC), the Aging and Long Term Care of Eastern
Washington, Greater Spokane Valley Chamber of Commerce, Spokane Regional Clean Air
Agency, the Growth Management Steering Committee, Greater Spokane Inc. (GSI), the' lousing
and Community Development Advisory Committee, the Mayor's Association of Northeast
Washington (Mayor only), Spokane County Continuum of Care for the Homeless, the Spokane
Regional Tourism Promotion Area, Visit Spokane, the Spokane Regional Law and Justice Council,
and the Wastewater Policy Advisory Board.
Page 4 of 6
Various Councilmembers are also members of standing internal committees, including the City
Finance Committee, the City Governance Manual Committee, and the Lodging Tax Advisory
Committee. Additionally, Councilmembers have contributed as members of ad hoc committees,
such as the Economic Development Committee and the Sidewalk Snow Committee.
The Mayor and Councilmembers also represent the City at the state and national level, with past
Councilmembers serving in officer leadership roles with the Association of Washington Cities and
the National League of Cities.
The responsibilities of the Mayor and Councilmembers include maintaining frequent contact with
the community to ensure familiarity with existing and emerging issues of concern and interest for
our citizens. The Mayor and CounciImembers are also active in a wide range of community
organizations and events.
Councilmembers regularly receive and respond to letters, e-mails, and telephone calls. Many past
and current Councilmembers have visited area high schools to discuss issues of importance to
Spokane Valley's youth. A previous Councilmember regularly conducted meetings of a youth
group organized as the Spokane Valley Youth Voice, organized in an effort to engage high school
aged young adults to generate ideas of interest for their age group where the City may have an
ability to cause change.
The Mayor and Councilmembers develop and deliver presentations to community organizations,
such as the Spokane Valley Chamber of Commerce and Kiwanis. They write articles and guest
editorials, conduct press conferences and conduct on -air interviews. They attend ceremonies such
as ribbon cuttings, ground breakings, grand openings, open houses, graduations, and special events
at local schools. At some of these events they are simply in attendance, and at others they are
writing and delivering speeches or acting as master of ceremonies.
In addition to the above responsibilities, the Mayor presides at Council meetings. The Deputy
Mayor assumes the responsibilities of the Mayor in the Mayor's absence.
Rationale for the Proposal
The current salary for the Mayor is $1,775 per month, and $1,415 per month for Councilmembers,
which were established in 2018. The City reimburses them for actual expenses incurred while
performing City -related duties, generally relating to travel. The Salary Commission members
uniformly agreed that the salary amount should be increased to properly compensate the Council
for the amount of time elected officials are obliged to devote to the City, and for the responsibility
of representing the City and its residents. However, the Salary Commission believes a component
of being a Councilmember should be grounded to some extent in a sense of volunteerism and a
desire to serve the community. Every Salary Commission member expressed appreciation for the
work of each member of the City Council.
The Commission recognizes that a Councilmember is never "off -duty." He or she is approached
by citizens not only at official events, but also in his or her everyday life, such as at work, at the
Page 5 of 6
grocery store and at church. The Salary Commission members feel this accessibility is important
to the community.
The Salary Commission had a general discussion regarding total compensation, including salary
and optional benefits. The purpose of the Salary Commission pursuant to SVMC 2.10.020(A)(2)
is to establish the salary of the Mayor and CounciImembers, which excludes consideration of any
benefits received outside of the monthly salary.
Salary Schedule Proposal
Based upon a unanimous vote, the Spokane Valley 2022 Salary Commission proposes the
following salary schedule for the City of Spokane Valley Mayor and Councihnembers:
Position Current Monthly Proposed Monthly
Sala ry
Salary
Mayor
Councilmember
$1,775
$1,415
$2,250
$1,800
Pursuant to RCW 35.21.015, this salary schedule shall become effective and incorporated into the
City budget without further action of the City Council or Salary Commission, subject to a
referendum of the people.
The Salary Commission also wanted to again re commend that a Salary Commission be convened
every three years. When review and adjustment occurs many years apart, any adjustment looks
unnaturally larger than it would if regular adjustments had been made.
Respectfully submitted,
Dan Allison
Charles Dowers
Tes Sturges
Steven Wareham
Kathe Williams
Eric Rieckers (alternate
Attachments: (1) Meeting summaries; (2) summary of public survey results;
and (3) table of comparable cities.
Page 6 of 6
Spokane
Valley
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK
Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk
10210 E Sprague Avenue ♦ Spokane Valley WA 99206
Phone: (509) 720-5102 • www.spokanevalley.org
ebain b r i dge (rid spokanevalley.org
SPOKANE VALLEY INDEPENDENT SALARY COMMISSION
Spokane Valley City Hall, Conference Room N212
(In person and via Zoom)
January 25, 2022 Meeting Summary
Commission Members Present:
Dan Allison
Charles Dowers
Tes Sturges
Kathe Williams
Steven Wareham
Eric Rieckers — Alternate (present via zoom)
Others Present: one citizen stayed for a few minutes
Staff Present:
Cary Driskell, City Attorney
John Whitehead, Human Resources Manager
Chris Bainbridge, City Clerk
Meeting Summary:
City Attorney Driskell convened the meeting at 3:30 p.m. and extended thanks to everyone for attending. Mr.
Driskell briefly explained the mechanisms for changing the salary of councilmembers; and of our
council/manager form of government; he then explained the need for Public Record Act and Open Public
Meetings Act training; and then went through the training via his PowerPoint presentation.
It was quickly decided by the group that a chair and vice -chair are not necessary, and that Mr. Driskell would
facilitate the meetings.
Discussion moved to the survey to councilmembers used as part of the last (2018) salary commission tools,
and it was decided to use the same list but to add one more question, as a first question, to ask
Councilmembers about their total hours. Commission members also agreed that City CIerk Bainbridge would
make that change, and submit them to the eouncilmernbers.
Concerning salary, there was very brief discussion about minimum wage with Mr. Whitehead indicating that
was a factor during the last (2018) commission discussions. Mr. Whitehead was also asked to bring data on
council salaries by checking with the same nine cities as was done in 2018, and to bring back data to this
group including the last time those cities updated their council's salary.
Public comments were invited but there were no members of the public attending, either in person or via
Zoom.
It was decided that the next meeting will be held Thursday, February 3, 2022, at 4 pm in this room.
The meeting adjourned at 4:33 p.m.
Salary Commission Meeting Summary 01-25-2022 Page 1 of 1
CI 11' (lP ��./
Sp4k iii
_Valley
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK
Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk
10210 E Sprague Avenue • Spokane Valley WA 99206
Phone: (509) 720-5102 ♦ www.spokanevalley.org
cbainbridge@spokanevalley.org
SPOKANE VALLEY INDEPENDENT SALARY COMMISSION
Spokane Valley City Hall, Conference Room N212
(In person and via Zoom)
February 3, 2022 Meeting Summary
Commission Members Present: Staff Present:
Dan Allison Cary Driskell, City Attorney
Charles Dowers John Whitehead, Human Resources Manager
Tes Sturges Chris Bainbridge, City Clerk
Kathe Williams
Steven Wareham
Eric Rieckers -- Alternate (present via zoom)
Members of the Public: Barb Howard
Meeting Summary:
City Attorney Driskell convened the meeting at 4:00 p.m. Mr. Driskell noted that the last time this committee
was formed, the alternate member also partook in the discussion, and he encouraged Mr. Rieckers to feel free to
enter into the discussion.
Mr. Driskell also briefly went over what was discussed at the last meeting, as noted in the meeting summary.
Regarding the survey of questions to Council, it was stated that those have been distributed to councilmembers,
with copies to the salary commission members, and asking Council to return the survey to City Clerk Bainbridge
by 5:00 p.m. Wednesday, February 9, 2022. Commission members agreed they would like Councilmember Wick
to complete two surveys, one as councilmember and one as mayor.
Discussion moved to the chart of data that Human Resources Manager Whitehead provided. Comments included
noting the difference between a council manager (CM) and a strong mayor (SM); and that it was considered best
not to consider benefits due to the multitude of variables. Commission members then focused on which cities to
include in the data, and it was decided to omit Shoreline and Pasco since they haven't had a salary change since
2014 and 2018 respectively, to use the other seven council member cities form of government from the last time,
but to omit the large cities of Bellevue and Vancouver, and bring up Lacey from the bottom tier to include in the
top tier, which would then result in using the seven cities of Burien, Kennewick, Kirkland, Olympia, Richland,
Yakima, and Lacey.
The citizen web survey from last time was also discussed. Suggestions included adding another bracket or two
higher for the councilmembers and the mayor; to wait until we get more information on minimum wage and the
salary questions results from the Councilmembers; there were also suggestions to re -word the citizen questions.
There was discussion on the minimum wage and the CPI; and about how much focus is on council wage versus
value of service.
It was determined that the next meeting will be Friday, February 11 at 3:30 p.m. at which time the commission
will review the city data and survey results. There were no public comments.
The meeting ended at 4:56 p.m.
Salary Commission Meeting Summary 02-03-2022 Page 1 of 1
�pakane
,,,Valley
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK
Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk
10210 E Sprague Avenue ♦ Spokane Valley WA 99206
Phone: (509) 720-5102 ♦ www.spokanevalley.org
cbainbridge@spokanevalley.org
spokanevalley.org
SPOKANE VALLEY INDEPENDENT SALARY COMMISSION
Spokane Valley City Hall, Conference Room N212
(In person and via Zoom)
February 11, 2022 Meeting Summary, 3:30 p.m.
Commission Members Present:
Dan Allison
Charles Dowers
Tes Sturges
Steven Wareham
Eric Rieckers (alternate)
Absent: Kathe Williams
Staff Present:
Cary Driskell, City Attorney
John Whitehead, Human Resources Manager
Chris Bainbridge, City Clerk
Meeting Summary:
Due to technical difficulties, with apologies from staff, the meeting was convened at 4:01 p.m. It was determined
previously that since Ms. Kathe Williams would not be in attendance at this meeting, that Mr. Eric Rieckers would
stand in as alternate.
Mr. Driskell gave a brief recap of the information received from individual councilmembers of their time spent in
their various duties. It was noted that rather than the seven comparison cities mentioned in the previous meeting's
summary, that the comparison cities should have also included Bellevue and Vancouver in order to capture data
from larger cities as well, and that data was shown on the updated spreadsheet given by Mr. Whitehead, showing
the cities of Bellevue, Burien, Kennewick, Kirkland, Olympia, Pasco, Richland, Vancouver, and Lacey.
Commission members went over the tallied information received from councilmembers regarding time they spend
in their role as councilmember, and it was noted that Councilmember Wick, instead of submitting survey questions
as councilmember and as mayor as was previously suggested, that he preferred only giving the one as
councilmember. There was discussion about these figures compared with figures from 2018 council survey
questions, that these last two years included members of council working during the pandemic; that committees
and responsibilities change and there is a mayor/deputy selection every two years. Mr. Whitehead mentioned that
some ways a salary can change is based on minimum wage, CPI, benchmarking, or other considerations such as
service, effort, a blend of the two, and time commitment. It was also mentioned that part of the 2018 commission,
the thought was to have the mayor's salary 25% higher than the councilmembers, but it was decided to wait before
making that decision to see the results from the citizen web survey.
Discussion moved to the web survey with the suggestion to have the material up on our website this Monday, with
a return deadline from citizens, of 4 pm February 23. Mr. Driskell said that staff will include a brief paragraph
on the web survey to succinctly explain the role of a councilmember. It was noted there were no public attendees
at today's meeting. Future commission meeting dates were confirmed for Thursday, February 24 at 4 pm, and
Thursday, March 3 at 4 pm.
The meeting ended at 4:44 p.m.
Salary Commission Meeting Summary 02-1 1-2022 Page 1 of 1
Spokane
.,,.. Valley
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK
Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk
10210 E Sprague Avenue 1 Spokane Valley WA 99206
Phone: (509) 720-5102 1 www.spokanevalley.org
chainbridge@spokanevalley.org
spokanevalley.org
SPOKANE VALLEY INDEPENDENT SALARY COMMISSION
Spokane Valley City Hall, Conference Room N212
(In person and via Zoom)
February 24, 2022 Meeting Summary, 4:00 p.rn.
Commission Members Present:
Dan Allison
Charles Dowers
Tes Sturges (via zoom)
Steven Wareham
Kathe Williams
Absent: Eric Rieckers (alternate)
Staff Present:
Cary Driskell, City Attorney
John Whitehead, Human Resources Manager
Chris Bainbridge, City Clerk
Meeting Summary:
Mr. Driskell convened the meeting at 4:00 p.m. Commission members turned to the results of the citizen survey
responses, and it was noted 135 responses were received as compared with about 86 responses received from the
2018 survey.*
Mr. Driskell noted we have now received the information from councilmembers regarding their reported work
hours, the data from Mr. Whitehead on the nine cities, and the results of the citizen survey. Several Commission
members noted they were pleased with the citizen survey results as it shows that people are not necessarily
opposed to an increase.
Discussion focused on the variety of methods one could use in calculating a recommended salary, including
basing the councilmember's work week on 30 hours and the mayor's on 39; using 90% of the minimum wage as
a base; trying to balance service with workload; using an average or middle wage response; comparing the top
responses to the other categories; adjusting the mayor's salary to 25% more than a councilmember's; keeping in
mind the salary would likely not change for the next three years; comparing the last survey wage results with the
current wage results; and using hours works and pay based on 12 months or 52 weeks. Discussion culminated
with the following recommendation, which was unanimously agreed to by ail Commissioners: $2250 for the
Mayor's salary, and $1800 for each Councilmember's salary. Mr. Driskell said he will update the last report and
include these new recommended salaries, and that he is hopeful he will be able to have a draft report for the
Commission's review next week, and if possible, will send to Commission members prior to the meeting so each
will have an opportunity to review the material; and he noted the final report will also ultimately include the
meeting summary of each meeting.
There were no public comments as there were no members of the public in attendance.
The meeting ended at 4:58 p.m.
* The 2018 survey had 78 responses within the Cily's zip code, and the current survey included 130 responses within the City's zip code.
Salary Commission Meeting Summary 02-11-2022 Page 1 of 1
Spokane
�alley�
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK
Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk
10210 E Sprague Avenue • Spokane Valley WA 99206
Phone: (509) 720-5102 ♦ Fax: (509) 720-5075 ♦ www.spokanevalley.org
ebainbridge@spokanevalley.org
SPOKANE VALLEY INDEPENDENT SALARY COMMISSION
Spokane Valley City Hall, Conference Room N212
March 3, 2022 Meeting Summary
(In person and via zoom)
Commission Members Present: Staff Present:
Dan Allison Cary Driskell, City Attorney
Charles Dowers Chris Bainbridge, City Clerk
Tes Sturges
Steven Wareham
Kathe Williams
Eric Rieckers — via zoom (alternate)
Others Present: Diana Wilhite
Meeting Summary:
Mr. Driskell convened the meeting at 4:00 p.m.
Mr. Driskell asked if there were any proposed changes to the finalized draft report. After brief discussion, it
was determined there were none. Mr. Driskell gave a brief summary of the report, the process this commission
used to determine the new salaries, and the final process of giving this report to Council during their March
15, 2022 meeting; that the salary schedule will be published March 11 and March 18, and if no referendum
petition is filed by thirty days after March 18, the new salaries will be as stated, with no further action to be
taken by Council. It was moved by Ms. Sturges, seconded and unanimously agreed to approve the 2022
Independent Salary Commission Report, with the exception that the Clerk will add the meeting summary from
the March 3, 2022 meeting. Public comments were solicited, and Ms. Wilhite asked for the difference in the
proposal salary from the current salary, and Mr. Driskell gave her a copy of the final report which included
that information. There were no other public comments.
The meeting adjourned at 4:17 p.m.
Salary Commission Meeting Summary 03-03-2022 Page 1 of 1
Councilmember Salary Survey 2022 Results
Q1 Spokane Valley City Councilmembers report they work an average of
27-35 hours per week across a range of various duties. Given the
responsibilities of the Councilmembers, how much do you feel is an
appropriate monthly salary? Each Councilmember's current monthly
salary is $1,415.Please select only ONE response.
$1,250 - $1,500
$1,500 - $1,750
$1,750 - $2,000
$2,000 - $2,250
$2,250 - $2,500
ANSWER CHOICES
$1,250 - $1,500
$1,500 - $1,750
$1,750 - $2,000
$2,000 - $2,250
$2,250 - $2,500
Total Respondents: 135
Answered: 135 Skipped: 0
0% 10% 20% 30°/u 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
RESPONSES
41.48% 56
17.78% 24
14.07% 19
11.85% 16
14.81% 20
1/ 1
Councilmember Salary Survey 2022 Results
Q2 Spokane Valley Mayors report they work an average of 34-43 hours
per week across a range of various duties. Given the responsibilities of
the Mayor, how much do you feel is an appropriate monthly salary? The
Mayor's current monthly salary is $1,775.Please select only ONE
response.
$1,750 - $2,000
$2,000 - $2,250
$2,250 - $2,500
ANSWER CHOICES
$1,750 - $2,000
$2,000 - $2,250
$2,250 - $2,500
Total Respondents: 135
Answered: 135 Skipped: 0
MEM
0%
10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
RESPONSES
48.15% 65
22.96% 31
28.89% 39
112
Councilmember Salary Survey 2022 Results
Q3 What is your residential zip code? Please select only one response.
99016
99206
99212
99216
99037
Other (please
specify)
ANSWER CHOICES
99016
99206
99212
99216
99037
Other (please specify)
Total Respondents: 135
Answered: 135 Skipped: 0
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
RESPONSES
11.11% 15
34.81% 47
11.85% 16
25.93% 35
12.59% 17
3.70% 5
1/3
Survey of monthly salaries in comparable cities:
Municipality Population* Mayor salary** Councilmember salary**
Burien 53,290 $937 $750
Lacey 54,780 $1,950 $1,675
Olympia 55,010 $2,192 $1,827
Richland 59,570 $1,481 $1,231
Pasco 79,580 $1,450 $1,115
Kennewick 85,940 $1,475 $1,275
Kirkland 92,110 $1,624 $1,275
Bellevue 149,900 $2,829 $2,394
Vancouver 194,600 $2,614 $2,045
* Official April 1, 2021 Population estimates: Office of Financial Management (OFM).
** Source: AWC 2021 salary data.
r.r.].�. of r„ �~m„
Spokane
�.�Valley
Memorandum
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
Chelsie Taylor, Finance Director
10210 E Sprague Avenue • Spokane Valley WA 99206
Phone: (509) 720-5000 • Fax: (509) 720-5075 •
www.spokanevalley.org
To: John Hohman, City Manager
From: Chelsie Taylor, Finance Director
Date: March 9, 2022
Re: Finance Department Activity Report — January 2022
Following is information pertaining to Finance Department activities through the end of January
2022 and included herein is an updated 2021 Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and
Expenditures through the end of December 2021. For the next couple of months we will focus our
financial analysis on 2021 rather than 2022, because how 2021 wraps up will largely guide our
decision making process as we progress towards the 2023 Budget development process.
2021 Year-end Process
January of any year involves the process of shutting down one year and getting started on
another. The workload includes processing separate batches of invoices related to either 2021 or
2022 and ultimately issuing 1099s to the variety of vendors from whom we make purchases
throughout the year. Payroll work includes setting up new wage, health insurance and tax rates
for 2022 and issuing W-2s for 2021. January is also when we begin closing books for 2021 and
we hope to have this process complete by the end of March. This process typically continues
through March because we continue to receive additional information pertaining to 2021 for both
revenues and expenditures (particularly construction related activity). Following the closing of the
books, we will begin the process of preparing our annual financial report which will be finished by
the end of May. We hope to have the State Auditor's Office on site by early June to begin the
audit of 2021.
Budget to Actual Comparison Report
A report reflecting 2021 Budget to Actual Revenues and Expenditures for those funds for which
a 2021 Budget was adopted is located on pages 5 through 18. It's important to keep in mind that
the figures included are preliminary and we anticipate they will continue to change as a result of
the fact that we continue to receive invoices related to 2021 expenditure activity as well as some
additional revenues. We will follow up with final 2021 figures once the books are closed.
We've included the following information in the report:
• Revenues by source for all funds, and expenditures by department in the General Fund and
by type in all other funds.
• A breakdown between recurring and nonrecurring revenues and expenditures in the General
Fund, Street O&M Fund and Stormwater Fund.
• The change in fund balance including beginning and ending figures. The beginning fund
balance figures are those that are reflected in our 2020 Annual Financial Report.
P:IFinancelFinance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports1202212022 01 31 - 2021 12 PRELIMINARY No 2.docx
Page 1
• Columns of information include:
o The 2021 Budget as amended
o December 2021 activity
o Cumulative 2021 activity through December 2021
o Budget remaining in terms of dollars
o The percent of budgeted revenue collected or budgeted expenditures disbursed
A few points related to the General Fund #001 (page 5):
Recurring revenues collections are currently at 120.86% of the amount budgeted with 100.00%
of the year elapsed.
• Property taxes are paid to Spokane County in two installments each year on April 30 and
October 31 and are then remitted to the City primarily in May and November with lesser
amounts typically remitted in June and December. Property taxes received thus far in 2021
are $12,950,155 or 101.78% of the amount budgeted. In January we received one final
payment related to 2021 collections that is reflected herein.
• Sales tax collections finished the year at $31,499,534 which was $6,299,534 or 25.00%
greater than the amount budgeted.
• Gambling taxes are at $356,590 or 92.86% of the amount budgeted. Gambling taxes are
paid quarterly with fourth quarter payments due by January 31st. At this point we have not
received and booked all 2021 revenues, but once received, we anticipate that 2021
revenues will approximate budgeted amounts.
• Franchise Fee and Business Registration revenues are typically received in the month
following a calendar year quarter. So far in 2021 we have received $1,076,145 or 88.57% of
the amount budgeted. Fourth quarter franchise fees will be received in February, and I
anticipate actual revenues will approximate the budget estimate at that point.
• State shared revenues are composed of State of Washington distributions that include items
such as liquor board profits, liquor excise tax, marijuana excise tax, and criminal justice
monies. Most of these revenues are paid by the State in the month following a calendar
quarter. These have collectively finished the year at $2,685,218 or 52.57% greater than the
amount budgeted.
• Fines and forfeitures revenues are composed of monthly remittances from Spokane County
with payments made in the month following the actual assessment of a fine and false alarm
fees. Revenues are currently at $404,847 which is $141,153 or 25.85% Tess than the amount
budgeted.
• Community and Public Works service revenues are largely composed of building permit and
plan review fees as well as right of way permits. Revenues are currently at $4,946,202 or
259.14% of the amount budgeted. The amount collected is far in excess of the amount of
the budget expectation primarily due to several large construction projects in the City that
were permitted during 2021.
• Recreation program revenues are composed of revenues generated by the variety of parks
and recreation programs including classes, swimming pools (in -season), and CenterPlace.
The year ended with revenues totaling $313,408 or 48.70% of the amount budgeted. This
amount is significantly lower than average due to closures and restricted activities caused
by the COVID-19 pandemic.
Recurring expenditures are currently at $41,905,829 or 93.18% of the amount budgeted with
100.00% of the year elapsed. Once all invoices related to 2021 activity are received and
booked, we anticipate a higher percentage of the budget will be consumed.
P:IFinancelFinance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports1202212022 01 31 - 2021 12 PRELIMINARY No 2.docx
Page 2
Investments (page 19)
Investments at December 31 total $86,959,363 and are composed of $81,866,943 in the
Washington State Local Government Investment Pool and $5,092,420 in bank CDs.
Total Sales Tax Receipts (page 20)
Total sales tax receipts reflect State remittances through December and total $35,370,197
including general, criminal justice, and public safety taxes. This figure is $6,919,328.45 or 24.32%
greater than the same twelve-month period in 2020.
Economic Indicators (pages 21 — 23)
The following economic indicators provide information pertaining to three different sources of tax
revenue that provide a good gauge of the health and direction of the overall economy.
1. Sales taxes (page 21) provide a sense of how much individuals and businesses are spending
on the purchase of goods.
2. Hotel / Motel taxes (page 22) provide us with a sense of overnight stays and visits to our area
by tourists or business travelers.
3. Real Estate Excise taxes (page 23) provide us with a sense of real estate sales.
Page 21 provides a 10-year history of general sales tax receipts (not including public safety or
criminal justice) with monthly detail beginning January 2012.
• Compared with calendar year 2020, 2021 collections have increased by $6,261,053 or
24.81 %.
• Tax receipts reached an all-time high in 2021 of $31,499,534, besting the previous record
year of 2020 when $25,238,481 was collected.
Page 22 provides a 10-year history of hotel/motel tax receipts with monthly detail beginning
January 2012.
• Compared with calendar year 2020, 2021 collections have increased by $301,194 or 67.95%.
• Collections reached an all-time high in 2021 of $744,437, besting the previous record of
$743,851 in 2019.
Page 23 provides a 10-year history of real estate excise tax receipts with monthly detail
beginning January 2012.
• Compared with calendar year 2020, 2021 collections have increased by $2,560,201 or
69.99%. This increase is being driven by a few months of unusually high collections.
• Collections reached an all-time high in 2021 of $6,218,227.
Debt Capacity and Bonds Outstanding (page 24)
This page provides information on the City's debt capacity, or the dollar amount of General
Obligation (G.O.) Bonds the City may issue, as well as an amortization schedule of the bonds the
City currently has outstanding.
• The maximum amount of G.O. bonds the City may issue is determined by the assessed value
for property taxes which for 2022 is $12,919,694,944. Following the December 1, 2021 debt
service payments, the City has $10,485,000 of nonvoted G.O. bonds outstanding which
represents 5.41 % of our nonvoted bond capacity, and 1.08% of our total debt capacity for all
types of bonds. Of this amount:
o $3,780,000 remains on bonds issued for the construction of CenterPlace. These bonds
are repaid with a portion of the 1/10 of 1 % sales tax that is collected by the Spokane Public
Facilities District.
o $305,000 remains on bonds issued for road and street improvements around CenterPlace.
The bonds are repaid with a portion of the real estate excise tax collected by the City.
P:IFinancelFinance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports1202212022 01 31 - 2021 12 PRELIMINARY No 2.docx
Page 3
o $6,400,000 remains on bonds issued for construction of the new City Hall. The bonds are
to be repaid with General Fund revenues.
Street Fund Revenue Sources (pages 25 and 26)
The last two charts reflect a history for the two primary sources of revenue in Street Fund #101.
These include:
Page 25 provides a 10-year history of Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax collections with monthly detail
beginning January 2012.
• Compared with calendar year 2020, 2021 collections have increased by $164,756 or 9.44%.
• Tax receipts peaked in 2007 at just approximately $2.1 million and have generally ranged
around $2 million in the years 2012 through 2020.
Page 26 provides a 10-year history of Telephone Utility Tax collections with monthly detail
beginning January 2012.
• Compared with 2020, 2021 collections have decreased by $278,942 or 21.15%. Unlike tax
revenues collected by the State and remitted monthly, these taxes are paid to the City directly
by the service provider. Consequently, there is not a "clean cutoff' in terms of when a vendor
pays the tax.
• Tax receipts peaked in 2009 at $3,054,473 and have decreased each year since due to what
we suspect is the reduction in land lines by individual households.
• The 2021 budget is set at $1,000,000. It appears that 2021 will close out at close to the
budgeted amount.
P:IFinancelFinance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports1202212022 01 31 - 2021 12 PRELIMINARY No 2.docx
Page 4
P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2022\2022 01 31 - 2021 12 PRELIMINARY No 2
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA
Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures
For the Twelve -Month Period Ended December 31, 2021
#001 - GENERAL FUND
RECURRING ACTIVITY
Budget Year
Elapsed =
2021
100.00%
2021
Budget
Actual Actual through Budget
December December 31 Remaining
% of
Budget
Revenues
Property Tax 12,724,200 1,052,996 12,950,155 225,955 101.78%
Sales Tax 25,200,000 5,081,299 31,499,534 6,299,534 125.00%
Sales Tax - Public Safety 1,160,000 243,874 1,398,648 238,648 120.57%
Sales Tax - Criminal Justice 2,040,000 427,514 2,472,016 432,016 121.18%
Gambling Tax and Leasehold Excise Tax 384,000 20 356,590 (27,410) 92.86%
Franchise Fees/Business Registration 1,215,000 30,762 1,076,145 (138,855) 88.57%
State Shared Revenues 1,760,000 605,849 2,685,218 925,218 152.57%
Fines, Forfeitures and Penalties 546,000 27,612 404,847 (141,153) 74.15%
Community and Public Works 1,908,719 340,887 4,946,202 3,037,483 259.14%
Recreation Program Revenues 643,600 10,506 313,408 (330,192) 48.70%
Miscellaneous Department Revenue 21,000 19 20,951 (49) 99.77%
Miscellaneous& Investment Interest 592,500 23,181 160,551 (431,949) 27.10%
Transfers in - #105 (h/m tax-CP advertising) 30,000 0 0 (30,000) 0.00%
Total Recurring Revenues 48,225,019 7,844,520 58,284,264 10,059,245 120.86%
Expenditures
City Council 638,672 46,069 511,628 127,044 80.11%
City Manager 1,175,839 194,664 1,115,817 60,022 94.90%
City Attorney 718,593 59,074 696,986 21,607 96.99%
Public Safety 27,897,861 2,480,904 26,606,579 1,291,282 95.37%
Deputy City Manager 284,844 19,821 284,688 156 99.95%
Finance / IT 1,500,659 127,427 1,323,105 177,554 88.17%
Human Resources 318,540 27,096 303,178 15,362 95.18%
City Hall Operations and Maintenance 373,601 62,567 383,515 (9,914) 102.65%
Community & Public Works - Engineering 2,098,642 157,364 1,718,471 380,171 81.88%
Community & Public Works - Econ Dev 1,097,061 136,120 981,097 115,964 89.43%
Community & Public Works - Bldg & Plan 2,414,558 191,290 2,330,524 84,034 96.52%
Parks & Rec - Administration 355,427 22,727 304,144 51,283 85.57%
Parks & Rec - Maintenance 940,003 158,493 937,429 2,574 99.73%
Parks & Rec - Recreation 328,534 14,258 183,369 145,165 55.81%
Parks & Rec - Aquatics 510,053 27,584 305,247 204,806 59.85%
Parks & Rec - Senior Center 35,403 3,156 30,425 4,978 85.94%
Parks & Rec - CenterPlace 972,214 84,653 741,823 230,391 76.30%
General Government 1,297,380 350,491 1,132,862 164,518 87.32%
Transfers out - #204 ('16 L TGO bond debt service) 401,500 33,458 401,500 0 100.00%
Transfers out - #309 (park capital projects) 160,000 13,333 160,000 0 100.00%
Transfers out - #311 (pavement preservation) 991,843 82,654 991,843 0 100.00%
Transfers out - #501 (CenterPlace kitchen reserve) 36,600 3,050 36,600 0 100.00%
Transfers out - #502 (insurance premium) 425,000 35,417 425,000 0 100.00%
Total Recurring Expenditures 44,972,827 4,331,669 41,905,829 3,066,998 93.18%
Recurring Revenues Over (Under)
Recurring Expenditures 3,252,192 3,512,851 16,378,436 13,126,244
Page 5
P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2022\2022 01 31 - 2021 12 PRELIMINARY No 2
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA
Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures
For the Twelve -Month Period Ended December 31, 2021
#001 - GENERAL FUND - continued
NONRECURRING ACTIVITY
Budget Year
Elapsed =
2021
100.00%
2021
Budget
Actual Actual through Budget
December December 31 Remaining
% of
Budget
Revenues
Grant Proceeds 89,000 0 113,831 24,831 127.90%
City Assistance for LE and CJ 0 0 389,399 389,399 0.00%
Total Nonrecurring Revenues 89,000 0 503,230 414,230 565.43%
Expenditures
City Manager (office furniture for Housing Servempl 5,000 0 2,969 2,031 59.39%
City Manager (cubicle furniture for Housing Sery offh 0 6,826 6,826 (6,826) 0.00%
Public Safety (replace HVAC units at Precinct) 62,000 1,989 2,531 59,469 4.08%
Public Safety (replace handguns) 37,500 0 0 37,500 0.00%
Public Safety (radar trailer) 11,400 0 0 11,400 0.00%
Public Safety (Precinct access control gate) 20,000 0 0 20,000 0.00%
Public Safety (Precinct fire panel replacement) 10,000 0 0 10,000 0.00%
Public Safety (Equipment for bike patrols) 0 0 4,977 (4,977) 0.00%
Public Safety (DEMS/TasersBodyCams) 109,608 0 0 109,608 0.00%
City Hall Repairs 0 60,886 349,569 (349,569) 0.00%
City Hall (replace light pole) 0 0 3,655 (3,655) 0.00%
Community & Public Works (Ecology SMP Update) 25,000 0 10,585 14,415 42.34%
Community & Public Works (Housing Action Plan) 40,000 0 44,992 (4,992) 112.48%
Windstorm 2021 Cleanup Costs 32,000 0 31,984 16 99.95%
General Government - IT capital replacements 212,800 66,880 105,252 107,548 49.46%
General Government (Covid-19 Related Costs) 0 8,941 37,141 (37,141) 0.00%
Transfers out - #101 (Street Fund operations) 2,552,600 253,967 2,552,600 0 100.00%
Transfers out - #122 (replenish reserve) 364,440 0 364,440 0 100.00%
Transfers out - #309 (CenterPlace west lawn) 20,000 0 0 20,000 0.00%
Transfers out - #309 (CenterPlace roof repairs) 15,000 0 0 15,000 0.00%
Transfers out - #312 ('19 fund bal >50%) 11,126,343 0 11,126,343 0 100.00%
Total Nonrecurring Expenditures 14,643,691 399,489 14,643,863 (172) 100.00%
Nonrecurring Revenues Over (Under)
Nonrecurring Expenditures (14,554,691) (399,489) (14,140,633) 414,058
Excess (Deficit) of Total Revenues
Over (Under) Total Expenditures (11,302,499) 3,113,361 2,237,802 13,540,301
Beginning fund balance 42,445,511 42,445,511
Ending fund balance 31,143,012 44,683,313
Page 6
P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2022\2022 01 31 - 2021 12 PRELIMINARY No 2
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA
Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures
For the Twelve -Month Period Ended December 31, 2021
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
#101 - STREET FUND
RECURRING ACTIVITY
Budget Year
Elapsed =
2021
100.00%
2021
Budget
Actual Actual through Budget
December December 31 Remaining
% of
Budget
Revenues
Telephone Utility Tax 1,000,000 82,797 949,277 (50,723) 94.93%
Motor Vehicle Fuel (Gas) Tax 1,800,000 335,024 1,901,926 101,926 105.66%
Multimodal Transportation 130,600 34,214 132,334 1,734 101.33%
Right -of -Way Maintenance Fee 70,000 0 21,124 (48,876) 30.18%
Investment Interest 4,000 185 556 (3,444) 13.89%
Miscellaneous Revenue 10,000 0 222,890 212,890 2228.90%
Total Recurring Revenues 3,014,600 452,220 3,228,106 213,506 107.08%
Expenditures
Wages / Benefits / Payroll Taxes 1,127,920 166,000 1,119,790 8,130 99.28%
Supplies 156,050 8,419 134,879 21,171 86.43%
Services & Charges 2,525,828 267,167 2,553,671 (27,843) 101.10%
Snow Operations 751,652 310,799 838,907 (87,255) 111.61 %
Intergovernmental Payments 935,000 195,874 951,594 (16,594) 101.77%
Vehicle Rentals - #501 (non -plow vehicle rental) 10,250 854 10,250 0 100.00%
Vehicle Rentals - #501 (plow replace) 60,500 5,042 60,500 0 100.00%
Total Recurring Expenditures 5,567,200 954,155 5,669,593 (102,393) 101.84%
Recurring Revenues Over (Under)
Recurring Expenditures (2,552,600) (501,935) (2,441,486) 111,114
NONRECURRING ACTIVITY
Revenues
Insurance Proceeds (traffic signal cabinet) 0 0 59,619 59,619 0.00%
Utilities Tax Recovery 0 0 50,472 50,472 0.00%
Transfers in - #001 2,552,600 253,967 2,552,600 0 100.00%
Total Nonrecurring Revenues 2,552,600 253,967 2,662,691 110,091 104.31%
Expenditures
Heavy Duty Machinery & Equipment (Plows) 0 0 17,228 (17,228) 0.00%
Traffic Control Devices -Repair & Maintenance 0 0 18,432 (18,432) 0.00%
Emergency Traffic Control Repairs 0 0 4,053 (4,053) 0.00%
Total Nonrecurring Expenditures 0 0 39,713 (39,713) 0.00%
Nonrecurring Revenues Over (Under)
Nonrecurring Expenditures 2,552,600 253,967 2,622,978 70,378
Excess (Deficit) of Total Revenues
Over (Under) Total Expenditures 0 (247,968) 181,492 181,492
Beginning fund balance 759,299 759,299
Ending fund balance 759,299 940,791
#103 - PATHS & TRAILS
Revenues
Motor Vehicle Fuel (Gas) Tax
Investment Interest
8,700 1,413 8,022 (678) 92.20%
200 4 21 (179) 10.42%
Total revenues 8,900
Expenditures
Capital Outlay
Total expenditures
1,417 8,043 (857) 90.37%
0
0 0 0 0.00%
0
0 0 0 0.00%
Revenues over (under) expenditures 8,900 1,417 8,043 (857)
Beginning fund balance 21,516 21,516
Ending fund balance 30,416 29,558
Page 7
P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2022\2022 01 31 - 2021 12 PRELIMINARY No 2
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA
Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures
For the Twelve -Month Period Ended December 31, 2021
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS - continued
Budget Year
Elapsed =
2021
100.00%
2021
Budget
Actual Actual through Budget
December December 31 Remaining
% of
Budget
#104 - TOURISM FACILITIES HOTEL/MOTEL TAX FUND
Revenues
Tourism Facilities Hotel/Motel Tax 400,000 65,468 481,321 81,321 120.33%
Investment Interest 2,500 428 2,617 117 104.68%
Transfers in -#105 1,157,000 0 0 (1,157,000) 0.00%
Total revenues
Expenditures
Capital Outlay
Total expenditures
Revenues over (under) expenditures
Beginning fund balance
Ending fund balance
#105 - HOTEL/MOTEL TAX FUND
Revenues
Hotel/Motel Tax
Investment Interest
1,559,500 65,896 483,938 (1,075,562) 31.03%
0
0 0 0 0.00%
0
0 0 0 0.00%
1,559,500
65,896 483,938 (1,075,562)
2,986,573 2,986,573
4,546,073 3,470,510
750,000 104,030 744,435 (5,565) 99.26%
700 172 898 198 128.29%
Total revenues 750,700 104,202 745,333 (5,367) 99.29%
Expenditures
Transfers out - #001 30,000 0 0 30,000 0.00%
Transfers out - #104 1,157,000 0 0 1,157,000 0.00%
Tourism Promotion 197,400 109,605 167,850 29,550 85.03%
Total expenditures 1,384,400 109,605 167,850
Revenues over (under) expenditures (633,700) (5,403) 577,483
Beginning fund balance 798,716 798,716
Ending fund balance 165,016 1,376,199
#106 - SOLID WASTE
Revenues
Solid Waste Administrative Fees
Solid Waste Road Wear Fee
Investment Interest
225,000 14,123
1,500,000 165,066
12,000 312
198,925
1,623,645
1,481
1,216,550
(1,221,917)
26,075
(123,645)
10,519
12.12%
88.41%
108.24%
12.34%
Total revenues 1,737,000 179,501 1,824,051 (87,051) 105.01 %
Expenditures
Transfers out - #311 1,537,776 0 0 1,537,776 0.00%
Education & Contract Administration 237,000 3,191 43,203 193,797 18.23%
Total expenditures 1,774,776 3,191 43,203 1,731,573 2.43%
Revenues over (under) expenditures (37,776) 176,310 1,780,848 (1,818,624)
Beginning fund balance 726,788 726,788
Ending fund balance 689,012 2,507,636
#107 - PEG FUND
Revenues
Comcast PEG Contribution
Investment Interest
79,000 17,555 54,045 24,955 68.41%
0 23 160 (160) 0.00%
Total revenues 79,000 17,579 54,204 24,796 68.61%
Expenditures
PEG Reimbursement - CMTV 39,500 38,519 38,519 981 97.52%
Capital Outlay 48,500 91 48,771 (271) 100.56%
Total expenditures 88,000 38,610 87,290 710 99.19%
Revenues over (under) expenditures (9,000) (21,032) (33,085) 24,085
Beginning fund balance 181,773 181,773
Ending fund balance 172,773 148,688
Page 8
P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2022\2022 01 31 - 2021 12 PRELIMINARY No 2
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA
Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures
For the Twelve -Month Period Ended December 31, 2021
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS - continued
Budget Year
Elapsed =
2021
100.00%
2021
Budget
Actual Actual through Budget
December December 31 Remaining
% of
Budget
#108 - AFFORDABLE & SUPPORTIVE HOUSING TAX FUND
Revenues
Affordable & Supportive Housing Tax 193,000 44,111 215,088 (22,088) 111.44%
Investment Interest 0 43 205 (205) 0.00%
Total revenues
193,000 44,154 215,293 (22,293) 111.55%
Expenditures
Affordable & Supportive Housing Program 0 0 0 0 0.00%
Total expenditures 0 0 0 0 0.00%
Revenues over (under) expenditures 193,000 44,154 215,293 (22,293)
Beginning fund balance 152,033 152,033
Ending fund balance 345,033 367,327
#120 - CENTER PLACE OPERATING RESERVE FUND
Revenues
Investment Interest
Transfers in
0
0
0 0 0 0.00%
0 0 0 0.00%
Total revenues 0 0 0 0 0.00%
Expenditures
Operations
Total expenditures
0
0 0 0 0.00%
0
0 0 0 0.00%
Revenues over (under) expenditures 0 0 0 0
Beginning fund balance 300,000 300,000
Ending fund balance 300,000 300,000
#121 - SERVICE LEVEL STABILIZATION RESERVE FUND
Revenues
Investment Interest
Transfers in
0
0
0 0 0 0.00%
0 0 0 0.00%
Total revenues 0 0 0 0 0.00%
Expenditures
Operations
Total expenditures
0
0 0 0 0.00%
0
0 0 0 0.00%
Revenues over (under) expenditures 0 0 0 0
Beginning fund balance 5,500,000 5,500,000
Ending fund balance 5,500,000 5,500,000
#122 - WINTER WEATHER RESERVE FUND
Revenues
Investment Interest
Transfers in - #001
1,900 65 209 (1,691) 10.99%
364,440 0 364,440 0 100.00%
Subtotal revenues 366,340 65 364,649 (1,691) 99.54%
Expenditures
Snow removal expenses 500,000 0 0 500,000 0.00%
Transfers out - #101 0 0 0 0 0.00%
Total expenditures 500,000 0 0 500,000 0.00%
Revenues over (under) expenditures (133,660) 65 364,649 (501,691)
Beginning fund balance 160,043 160,043
Ending fund balance 26,383 524,692
Page 9
P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2022\2022 01 31 - 2021 12 PRELIMINARY No 2
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA
Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures
For the Twelve -Month Period Ended December 31, 2021
DEBT SERVICE FUNDS
Budget Year
Elapsed =
2021
100.00%
2021
Budget
Actual Actual through Budget
December December 31 Remaining
% of
Budget
#204 - DEBT SERVICE FUND
Revenues
Spokane Public Facilities District 480,800 0 480,800 0 100.00%
Transfers in - #001 401,500 33,458 401,500 0 100.00%
Transfers in - #301 80,775 6,731 80,775 0 100.00%
Transfers in - #302 80,775 6,731 80,775 0 100.00%
Total revenues
1,043,850 46,921 1,043,850 0 100.00%
Expenditures
Debt Service Payments - CenterPlace 480,800 0 480,800 0 100.00%
Debt Service Payments - Roads 161,550 0 161,550 0 100.00%
Debt Service Payments -'16 LTGO Bond 401,500 0 401,500 0 100.00%
Total expenditures 1,043,850 0 1,043,850 0 100.00%
Revenues over (under) expenditures 0 46,921 0 0
Beginning fund balance 0 0
Ending fund balance 0 0
Page 10
P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2022\2022 01 31 - 2021 12 PRELIMINARY No 2
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA
Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures
For the Twelve -Month Period Ended December 31, 2021
CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS
#301 - CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND
Revenues
REET 1 - Taxes
Investment Interest
Total revenues
Budget Year
Elapsed =
2021
100.00%
2021
Budget
Actual Actual through Budget
December December 31 Remaining
% of
Budget
2,000,000
946,844 3,109,113 1,109,113
3,000 582 2,827 (173)
155.46%
94.25%
2,003,000 947,426 3,111,941 1,108,941 155.36%
Expenditures
Transfers out - #204 80,775 6,731 80,775 0 100.00%
Transfers out - #303 316,620 0 54,138 262,482 17.10%
Transfers out - #311 (pavement preservation) 827,278 0 0 827,278 0.00%
Total expenditures 1,224,673 6,731 134,913 1,089,760 11.02%
Revenues over (under) expenditures 778,327 940,695 2,977,028 19,181
Beginning fund balance 2,048,068 2,048,068
Ending fund balance 2,826,395 5,025,096
#302 - SPECIAL CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND
Revenues
REET 2 - Taxes
Investment Interest
Total revenues
2,000,000
946,844 3,109,113 1,109,113
5,500 905 5,137 (363)
155.46%
93.39%
2,005,500 947,750 3,114,250 1,108,750 155.29%
Expenditures
Transfers out - #204 80,775 6,731 80,775 0 100.00%
Transfers out - #303 1,662,684 0 787,612 875,072 47.37%
Transfers out - #311 (pavement preservation) 827,279 0 0 827,279 0.00%
Transfers out - #314 660,516 0 208,522 451,994 31.57%
Total expenditures 3,231,254 6,731 1,076,909 2,154,345 33.33%
Revenues over (under) expenditures (1,225,754) 941,018 2,037,341 (1,045,595)
Beginning fund balance 5,165,924 5,165,924
Ending fund balance 3,940,170 7,203,265
Page 11
P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2022\2022 01 31 - 2021 12 PRELIMINARY No 2
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA
Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures
For the Twelve -Month Period Ended December 31, 2021
CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS -continued
#303 STREET CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND
Revenues
Developer Contribution
Grant Proceeds
Transfers in -#301
Transfers in -#302
Transfers in - #312
Transfers in -#315
Investment Interest
Total revenues
Budget Year
Elapsed =
2021
100.00%
2021
Actual Actual through Budget % of
Budget December December 31 Remaining Budget
53,703 0 0 (53,703) 0.00%
6,843,308 102,905 4,119,261 (2,724,047) 60.19%
316,620 0 54,138 (262,482) 17.10%
1,662,684 0 787,612 (875,072) 47.37%
14,000 0 613,340 599,340 4381.00%
80,000 0 0 (80,000) 0.00%
0 1 218 218 0.00%
8,970,315 102,906 5,574,569 (3,395,746) 62.14%
Expenditures
205 Sprague/Barker Intersection Improvement 329,453 44,715 153,498 175,955 46.59%
249 Sullivan & Wellesley Intersection 1,020,522 588 92,731 927,791 9.09%
259 North Sullivan ITS Project 0 0 2,150 (2,150) 0.00%
267 Mission SW - Bowdish to Union 11,310 0 0 11,310 0.00%
275 Barker Rd Widening - River to Euclid 1,146,320 17,007 1,679,017 (532,697) 146.47%
285 Indiana Ave Pres - Evergreen to Sullivan 7,210 0 0 7,210 0.00%
292 Mullen Preservation: Broadway -Mission 0 0 508,213 (508,213) 0.00%
293 2018 CSS Citywide Reflective Signal BP 74,250 204 8,144 66,106 10.97%
294 Citywide Reflective Post Panels 17,875 65 3,169 14,706 17.73%
299 Argonne Rd Concrete Pvmt Indiana to Mont 2,392,450 55,776 2,205,438 187,012 92.18%
300 Pines & Mission Intersection Improvements 498,000 14,341 63,816 434,184 12.81%
301 Park & Mission Intersection Improvements 693,000 3,864 360,002 332,998 51.95%
303 S. Conklin Road Sidewalk 0 0 162 (162) 0.00%
310 Sullivan Rd Overcrossing UP RR Deck Rep. 317,625 139 241,954 75,671 76.18%
313 Barker Road/Union Pacific Crossing 1,312,500 13,236 61,642 1,250,858 4.70%
318 Wilbur Sidewalk: Boone to Mission 50,000 11,861 46,916 3,084 93.83%
320 Sullivan Preservation: Sprague-8th 19,800 1,105 13,537 6,263 68.37%
321 Argonne Corridor Impry - North of Knox 0 0 1,916 (1,916) 0.00%
323 Evergreen Road Preservation 0 0 258,658 (258,658) 0.00%
326 2020 Citywide Retroreflective Post Panel 0 2,471 5,639 (5,639) 0.00%
329 Barker Road Imp - City Limits to Appleway 80,000 7,134 109,443 (29,443) 136.80%
330 WTSC 2021 School Zone Beacons 0 9,498 41,780 (41,780) 0.00%
332 NE Industrial Area - Sewer Extension 0 5,437 65,163 (65,163) 0.00%
Contingency 1,000,000 0 0 1,000,000 0.00%
Total expenditures 8,970,315 187,442 5,922,989 3,047,326
Revenues over (under) expenditures 0 (84,535) (348,420) (6,443,072)
Beginning fund balance 67,402 67,402
Ending fund balance 67,402 (281,018)
Note: Work performed in the Street Capital Projects Fund for preservation projects is for items such as sidewalk upgrades that were bid
with the pavement preservation work.
66.03%
Page 12
P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2022\2022 01 31 - 2021 12 PRELIMINARY No 2
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA
Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures
For the Twelve -Month Period Ended December 31, 2021
CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS -continued
Budget Year
Elapsed =
2021
100.00%
2021
Budget
Actual Actual through Budget
December December 31 Remaining
% of
Budget
#309 - PARKS CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND
Revenues
Grant Proceeds 525,260 (2,417) 593,260 68,000 112.95%
Transfers in - #001 195,000 13,333 160,000 (35,000) 82.05%
Transfers in - #312 1,132,686 0 2,033 (1,130,653) 0.18%
Developer Contribution 0 17,896 17,896 17,896 0.00%
Investment Interest 0 0 20 20 0.00%
Total revenues
1,852,946 28,813 773,209 (1,079,737) 41.73%
Expenditures
268 Appleway Trail - Evergreen to Sullivan 2,033 0 2,165 (132) 106.49%
304 CenterPlace West Lawn Phase 2 20,000 65 19,930 70 99.65%
305 CenterPlace Roof Repair 15,000 0 (1,117) 16,117 -7.45%
314 Balfour Park Frontage Improvements 565,150 3,255 342,760 222,390 60.65%
315 Brown's Park 2020 Improvements 704,731 218 698,664 6,067 99.14%
316 Balfour Park Improvements - Phase 1 367,503 212,696 298,683 68,820 81.27%
328 Sullivan Park Waterline 98,000 19,405 25,269 72,731 25.78%
337 CP Great Room AV System Updates 25,350 0 36,951 (11,601) 145.76%
338 Loop Trail Project 100,000 75,000 79,136 20,864 79.14%
Repair/replace siding at Mirabeau restroom 30,000 0 0 30,000 0.00%
Total expenditures 1,927,767 310,639 1,502,443 425,324 77.94%
Revenues over (under) expenditures (74,821) (281,826) (729,233) (1,505,061)
Beginning fund balance 75,577 75,577
Ending fund balance 756 (653,656)
#310 - CIVIC FACILITIES CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND
Revenues
Investment Interest
800 105 692 (108) 86.49%
Total revenues 800 105 692 (108) 86.49%
Expenditures
Transfers out - #312 3,600 0 0 3,600 0.00%
Total expenditures 3,600 0 0 3,600 0.00%
Revenues over (under) expenditures (2,800) 105 692 (3,708)
Beginning fund balance 842,964 842,964
Ending fund balance 840,164 843,656
Note: The fund balance includes $839,285.10 paid by the Library District for 2.82 acres at the Balfour Park site. If the District does not succeed
in getting a voted bond approved by October 2017 then the City may repurchase this land at the original sale price of $839,285.10.
Page 13
P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2022\2022 01 31 - 2021 12 PRELIMINARY No 2
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA
Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures
For the Twelve -Month Period Ended December 31, 2021
CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS -continued
Budget Year
Elapsed =
2021
100.00%
2021
Budget
Actual Actual through Budget
December December 31 Remaining
% of
Budget
#311 - PAVEMENT PRESERVATION FUND
Revenues
Transfers in - #001 991,843 82,654 991,843 0 100.00%
Transfers in - #106 1,537,776 0 0 (1,537,776) 0.00%
Transfers in - #301 827,278 0 0 (827,278) 0.00%
Transfers in - #302 827,279 0 0 (827,279) 0.00%
Avista Contribution 0 0 29,011 29,011 0.00%
Grant Proceeds 0 0 0 0 0.00%
Investment Interest 0 304 3,448 3,448 0.00%
Total revenues
4,184,176 82,957 1,024,302 (3,159,874) 24.48%
Expenditures
Pre -Project GeoTech Services 50,000 0 0 50,000 0.00%
Pavement Preservation 3,790,877 0 0 3,790,877 0.00%
285 Indiana Ave Pres - Evergreen to Sullivan 0 0 8,129 (8,129) 0.00%
286 Broadway Preservation: Havana to Fancher 0 0 281 (281) 0.00%
292 Mullan Preservation: Broadway -Mission 0 9,432 1,157,662 (1,157,662) 0.00%
309 Local Access Streets: Barker Homes 0 9,520 205,272 (205,272) 0.00%
314 Balfour Park Frontage Improvements 0 466 216,422 (216,422) 0.00%
320 Sullivan Preservation: Sprague-8th 0 3,220 10,280 (10,280) 0.00%
323 Evergreen Road Preservation Project 0 805 1,412,222 (1,412,222) 0.00%
325 2021 Local Access Streets: South Park Rd 0 11,309 1,378,997 (1,378,997) 0.00%
333 Evergreen Rd Pres Broadway to Mission 0 19,123 19,123 (19,123) 0.00%
334 Sprague Avenue Preservation 0 16,551 34,026 (34,026) 0.00%
339 2022 Local Access Streets: Summerfield E 0 17,826 22,279 (22,279) 0.00%
Total expenditures 3,840,877 88,251 4,464,693 (623,816) 116.24%
Revenues over (under) expenditures 343,299 (5,294) (3,440,391) (2,536,058)
Beginning fund balance 5,792,145 5,792,145
Ending fund balance 6,135,444 2,351,755
#312 - CAPITAL RESERVE FUND
Revenues
Grant Proceeds 1,000,000 0 0 (1,000,000) 0.00%
Transfers in - #001 11,126,343 0 11,126,343 0 100.00%
Transfers in - #310 3,600 0 0 (3,600) 0.00%
Investment Interest 7,500 1,867 8,303 803 110.71%
Proceeds from Sale of Land 109,400 0 109,403 3 100.00%
Total revenues 12,246,843 1,867 11,244,049 (1,002,794) 91.81 %
Expenditures
Transfers out - #303 14,000 0 613,340 (599,340) 4381.00%
Transfers out - #309 1,132,686 0 2,033 1,130,653 0.18%
Transfers out - #314 1,647,731 0 675 1,647,056 0.04%
Transfers out - #316 10,000 0 0 10,000 0.00%
Land Acquisition 4,884,600 48,555 4,148,546 736,054 84.93%
Total expenditures 7,689,017 48,555 4,764,594 2,924,423 61.97%
Revenues over (under) expenditures 4,557,826 (46,688) 6,479,455 (3,927,217)
Beginning fund balance 8,503,764 8,503,764
Ending fund balance 13,061,590 14,983,220
Page 14
P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2022\2022 01 31 - 2021 12 PRELIMINARY No 2
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA
Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures
For the Twelve -Month Period Ended December 31, 2021
CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS -continued
Budget Year
Elapsed =
2021
100.00%
2021
Budget
Actual Actual through Budget
December December 31 Remaining
% of
Budget
#314 - RAILROAD GRADE SEPARATION PROJECTS FUND
Revenues
Grant Proceeds
Investment Interest
Transfers in - #302
Transfers in - #312
Utility Contribution
Miscellaneous Revenues
12,903,319 73,019 280,718 (12,622,601) 2.18%
0 0 427 427 0.00%
660,516 0 208,522 (451,994) 31.57%
1,647,731 0 675 (1,647,056) 0.04%
0 0 51,403 51,403 0.00%
0 1,500 17,771 17,771 0.00%
Total revenues 15,211,566
Expenditures
143 Barker Rd/BNSF Grade Separation 9,681,704
223 Pines Rd Underpass 4,149,450
311 Sullivan Rd./SR 290 Interchange Project 325,000
74,519 559,517 (14,652,049) 3.68%
22,350 1,058,028 8,623,676 10.93%
123,141 483,719 3,665,731 11.66%
20,216 170,333 154,667 52.41%
Total expenditures 14,156,154
Revenues over (under) expenditures 1,055,412
Beginning fund balance 793,526
Ending fund balance
#315 - TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEES
Revenues
Transportation Impact Fees
Investment Interest
165,706
(91,187)
1,712,080
(1,152,563)
793,526
1,848,938 (359,037)
12,444,074
(27,096,123)
12.09%
150,000 0 294,477 144,477 196.32%
0 37 131 131 0.00%
Total revenues 150,000 37 294,607 144,607 196.40%
Expenditures
Transfers out - #303 80,000 0 0 80,000 0.00%
Total expenditures 80,000 0 0 80,000 0.00%
Revenues over (under) expenditures 70,000 37 294,607 64,607
Beginning fund balance 0 0
Ending fund balance 70,000 294,607
#316 - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CAPITAL PROJECT FUND
Revenues
Transfers in - #312 10,000 0 0 (10,000) 0.00%
Investment Interest 0 0 0 0 0.00%
Total revenues 10,000 0 0 (10,000) 0.00%
Expenditures
Fair & Expo Center Expansion 10,000 625 3,121 6,879 31.21%
Total expenditures 10,000 625 3,121 6,879 31.21%
Revenues over (under) expenditures 0 (625) (3,121) (16,879)
Beginning fund balance 0 0
Ending fund balance 0 (3,121)
Page 15
P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2022\2022 01 31 - 2021 12 PRELIMINARY No 2
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA
Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures
For the Twelve -Month Period Ended December 31, 2021
ENTERPRISE FUNDS
#402 - STORMWATER FUND
RECURRING ACTIVITY
Budget Year
Elapsed =
2021
100.00%
2021
Budget
Actual Actual through Budget
December December 31 Remaining
% of
Budget
Revenues
Stormwater Management Fees 1,900,000 227,644 2,026,140 126,140 106.64%
Investment Interest 40,000 322 2,134 (37,866) 5.33%
Miscellaneous Revenues 0 0 0 0 0.00%
Total Recurring Revenues 1,940,000 227,966 2,028,274 88,274 104.55%
Expenditures
Wages / Benefits / Payroll Taxes 552,694 29,749 328,885 223,809 59.51 %
Supplies 14,750 831 14,162 588 96.02%
Services & Charges 1,320,643 177,469 1,153,789 166,854 87.37%
Intergovernmental Payments 45,000 21,307 42,222 2,778 93.83%
Vehicle Rentals - #501 6,750 563 6,750 0 100.00%
Total Recurring Expenditures 1,939,837 229,918 1,545,809 394,028 79.69%
Recurring Revenues Over (Under)
Recurring Expenditures 163 (1,952) 482,465 482,302
NONRECURRING ACTIVITY
Revenues
Grant Proceeds
100,000 0 95,000 (5,000) 95.00%
Total Nonrecurring Revenues 100,000 0 95,000 (5,000) 95.00%
Expenditures
Capital - various projects 660,000 0 3,122 656,878 0.47%
292 Mullen Preservation: Broadway -Mission 0 0 7,940 (7,940) 0.00%
300 Pines & Mission Intersection Improvement 0 0 468 (468) 0.00%
309 Local Access Streets: Barker Homes 0 1,242 5,907 (5,907) 0.00%
314 Balfour Park Frontage Improvements 0 638 176,966 (176,966) 0.00%
325 2021 Local Access Streets: South Park Rd 0 0 164,009 (164,009) 0.00%
Watershed Studies 100,000 5,007 37,242 62,758 37.24%
Stormwater Comprehensive Plan 100,000 0 0 100,000 0.00%
Total Nonrecurring Expenditures 860,000 6,887 395,654 464,346 46.01%
Nonrecurring Revenues Over (Under)
Nonrecurring Expenditures (760,000) (6,887) (300,654) 459,346
Excess (Deficit) of Total Revenues
Over (Under) Total Expenditures (759,837) (8,840) 181,812 941,649
Beginning working capital 2,159,796 2,159,796
Ending working capital 1,399,959 2,341,608
Note: Work performed in the Stormwater Fund for preservation projects is for stormwater improvements that were bid
with the pavement preservation work.
#403 - AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA
Revenues
Spokane County 460,000 282,528 522,357 62,357 113.56%
Grant Proceeds 1,507,045 0 728,188 (778,857) 48.32%
Developer Contribution 0 7,023 7,023 7,023 0.00%
Investment Interest 2,000 50 1,221 (779) 61.03%
Total revenues
1,969,045 289,602 1,258,789 (710,256) 63.93%
Expenditures
Capital - various projects 2,958,540 1,052,676 3,034,530 (75,990) 102.57%
Total expenditures 2,958,540 1,052,676 3,034,530 (75,990) 102.57%
Revenues over (under) expenditures (989,495) (763,073) (1,775,741) (634,266)
Beginning working capital 2,120,365 2,120,365
Ending working capital 1,130,870 344,623
Page 16
P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2022\2022 01 31 - 2021 12 PRELIMINARY No 2
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA
Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures
For the Twelve -Month Period Ended December 31, 2021
INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS
Budget Year
Elapsed =
2021
100.00%
2021
Budget
Actual Actual through Budget
December December 31 Remaining
% of
Budget
#501 - ER&R FUND
Revenues
Interfund vehicle lease - #001 31,300 2,608 31,300 0 100.00%
Interfund vehicle lease - #101 10,250 854 10,250 0 100.00%
Interfund vehicle lease - #101 (plow replace) 60,500 5,042 60,500 0 100.00%
Interfund vehicle lease - #402 6,750 563 6,750 0 100.00%
Transfers in - #001 (CenterPlace kitchen reserve) 36,600 3,050 36,600 0 100.00%
Investment Interest 10,000 174 1,147 (8,853) 11.47%
Total revenues
155,400 12,290 146,547 (8,853) 94.30%
Expenditures
Wages / Benefits / Payroll Taxes 0 685 23,863 (23,863) 0.00%
Small tools & minor equipment 10,000 556 5,036 4,964 50.36%
Equipment repair & maintenance 0 55 192 (192) 0.00%
Vehicle purchase 130,000 73,110 108,763 21,237 83.66%
Total expenditures 140,000 74,406 137,854 2,146 98.47%
Revenues over (under) expenditures 15,400 (62,116) 8,693 (10,998)
Beginning working capital 1,387,962 1,387,962
Ending working capital 1,403,362 1,396,655
#502 - RISK MANAGEMENT FUND
Revenues
Investment Interest
Transfers in - #001
0 49 117 117 0.00%
425,000 35,417 425,000 0 100.00%
Total revenues 425,000 35,465 425,117 117 100.03%
Expenditures
Auto & Property Insurance 425,000 0 365,384 59,616 85.97%
Unemployment Claims 0 0 7,398 (7,398) 0.00%
Total expenditures 425,000 0 372,782 52,218 87.71%
Revenues over (under) expenditures 0 35,465 52,336 (52,101)
Beginning working capital 340,484 340,484
Ending working capital 340,484 392,820
Page 17
P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2022\2022 01 31 - 2021 12 PRELIMINARY No 2
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA
Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures
For the Twelve -Month Period Ended December 31, 2021
FIDUCIARY FUNDS
#632 - PASSTHROUGH FEES & TAXES
Revenues
Passthrough Fees & Taxes
Total revenues
Expenditures
Passthrough Fees & Taxes
Total expenditures
Revenues over (under) expenditures
Beginning working capital
Ending working capital
Budget Year
Elapsed =
2021
100.00%
2021
Budget
Actual Actual through Budget
December December 31 Remaining
% of
Budget
399,687 29,574 388,826 (10,861) 97.28%
399,687 29,574 388,826 (10,861) 97.28%
400,000 24,990 404,250 (4,250) 101.06%
400,000 24,990 404,250 (4,250) 101.06%
(313) 4,583 (15,425) (6,611)
313 313
0
(15,112)
SUMMARY FOR ALL FUNDS
Total of Revenues for all Funds
Per Revenue Status Report
Difference
111,243,787
111,243,787
11,791,717
11,791,717
99,457,342
99,457,342
Total of Expenditures for all Funds 117,831,778 8,040,277 89,073,810
Per Expenditure Status Report 117,831,778 8,040,277 89,073,810
Difference -
Total Capital expenditures (included in
total expenditures)
37,967,561 1,997,844 21,415,099
Page 18
P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2022\2022 01 31 - 2021 12 PRELIMINARY No 2
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA
Investment Report
For the Twelve -Month Period Ended December 31, 2021
2/18/2022
LGI P"
NW Bank
CD #2068
Gesa
CD #7868
Total
Investments
Beginning $ 80,548,450.15 $ 3,088,005.28 $
Deposits 3, 462, 329.62 0.00
Withdrawls (2,150,000.00) 0.00
Interest 12,480.01 3,764.67
Jan'22 Accrued Interest Receivable (6,317.14) 0.00
0.00 $ 83,636,455.43
2,000,000.00 5,462,329.62
0.00 (2,150, 000.00)
649.97 16, 894.65
0.00 (6,317.14)
Ending $ 81,866,942.64 $ 3,091,769.95 $ 2,000,649.97 $ 86,959,362.56
001 General Fund
101 Street Fund
103 Trails & Paths
104 Tourism Facilities Hotel/Motel
105 Hotel/Motel
106 Solid Waste Fund
107 PEG Fund
108 Affordable & Supportive Housing
120 CenterPlace Operating Reserve
121 Service Level Stabilization Reserve
122 Winter Weather Reserve
301 Capital Projects
302 Special Capital Projects
303 Street Capital Projects Fund
309 Parks Capital Project
310 Civic Buildings Capital Projects
311 Pavement Preservation
312 Capital Reserve Fund
314 Railroad Grade Separation Projects
315 Transportation Impact Fees
316 Economic Development Capital Proj
402 Stormwater Management
403 Aquifer Protection Fund
501 Equipment Rental & Replacement
502 Risk Management
632 Passthrough Fees & Taxes
"Local Government Investment Pool
matures: 7/23/2022
rate: 0.50%
12/15/2022
0.70%
Balance
Earnings
Current Period
Year to date
Budget
$ 44, 550, 895.57 $ 15, 307.58
1, 215, 977.66 185.37
23, 567.55 3.59
2,806,710.60 427.87
1,128,256.33 171.99
2,043,871.68 311.57
152,528.13 23.25
281, 084.23 42.85
0.00 0.00
5, 500, 000.00 0.00
427,411.54 65.16
3,817,162.48 581.90
5, 938, 869.71 905.33
6,821.61 1.04
0.00 0.00
687,238.28 104.76
1, 991, 217.00 303.55
12, 244, 427.70 1,866.57
0.00 0.00
239,985.74 36.59
0.00 0.00
2,114,711.89 322.37
330,246.96 50.34
1,138, 389.03 173.54
319,988.87 48.78
0.00 0.00
70,407.24 $ 500,000.00
555.71 4,000.00
20.84 200.00
2,617.04 2,500.00
898.03 700.00
1,480.61 12, 000.00
159.61 0.00
204.92 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
208.89 1,900.00
2,827.47 3,000.00
5,136.65 5,500.00
217.70 0.00
19.66 0.00
691.94 800.00
3,448.07 0.00
8,303.08 7,500.00
427.27 0.00
130.62 0.00
0.00 0.00
2,133.78 40, 000.00
1,220.64 2,000.00
1,147.34 10, 000.00
117.23 0.00
0.00 0.00
$ 86,959,362.56 $ 20,934.00 $ 102,374.34 $ 590,100.00
Page 19
P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2022\2022 01 31 - 2021 12 PRELIMINARY No 2
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA
Sales Tax Receipts
For the Twelve -Month Period Ended December 31, 2021
Month
Received
2020
2021
2/18/2022
Difference
February 2,559,296.59 2,934,890.06 375,593.47 14.68%
March 2,015,206.15 2,445,374.71 430,168.56 21.35%
April 1,897,614.47 2,571,438.34 673,823.87 35.51%
May 1,847,551.89 3,369,522.86 1,521,970.97 82.38%
June 1,875,335.44 3,095,705.00 1,220,369.56 65.07%
July 2,570,769.98 3,127,275.84 556,505.86 21.65%
August 2,677,467.88 3,153,001.10 475,533.22 17.76%
September 2,682,700.17 2,951,757.95 269,057.78 10.03%
October 2,540,248.50 2,969,429.94 429,181.44 16.90%
November 2,731,249.99 2,999,113.99 267,864.00 9.81%
December 2,602,181.93 2,837,332.76 235,150.83 9.04%
January 2,451,245.65 2,915,354.54 464,108.89 18.93%
28, 450, 868.64 35, 370,197.09
28, 450, 868.64 35, 370,197.09
6,919,328.45 24.32%
Sales tax receipts reported here reflect remittances for general sales tax, criminal justice
sales tax and public safety tax.
The sales tax rate for retail sales transacted within the boundaries of the City of Spokane
Valley is 8.9%. The tax that is paid by a purchaser at the point of sale is remitted by the
vendor to the Washington State Department of Revenue who then remits the taxes back to
the various agencies that have imposed the tax. The allocation of the total 8.9% tax rate to
the agencies is as follows:
- State of Washington 6.50%
- City of Spokane Valley 0.85%
- Spokane County 0.15%
- Spokane Public Facilities District 0.10% *
- Criminal Justice 0.10%
- Public Safety 0.10% * 2.40% local tax
- Juvenile Jail 0.10% *
- Mental Health 0.10% *
- Law Enforcement Communications 0.10% *
- Spokane Transit Authority 0.80% *
8.90%
Indicates voter approved sales taxes
In addition to the .85% reported above that the City receives, we also receive a portion of
the Criminal Justice and Public Safety sales taxes. The distribution of those taxes is
computed as follows:
Criminal Justice: The tax is assessed county -wide and of the total collected, the
State distributes 10% of the receipts to Spokane County, with the remainder
allocated on a per capita basis to the County and the cities within the County.
Public Safety: The tax is assessed county -wide and of the total collected, the
State distributes 60% of the receipts to Spokane County, with the remainder
allocated on a per capita basis to the cities within the County.
Page 20
P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Tax Revenue\Sales Tax\2021 \sales tax collections 2021 - December
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA
Sales Tax Collections - December
For the years 2012 through 2021
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
January 1,589,887
February 1,009,389
March 1,067,733
April 1,277,621
May 1,174,962
June 1,290,976
July 1,302,706
August 1,299,678
September 1,383,123
October 1,358,533
November 1,349,580
December 1,323,189
1,671,269
1,133,347
1,148,486
1,358,834
1,320,449
1,389,802
1,424,243
1,465,563
1,466,148
1,439,321
1,362,021
1,408,134
1,677,887
1,170, 640
1,201,991
1,448,539
1,400,956
1,462,558
1,545,052
1,575,371
1,552,736
1,594,503
1,426,254
1,383,596
1,732,299
1,197,323
1,235,252
1,462,096
1,373,710
1,693,461
1,718,428
1,684,700
1,563,950
1,618,821
1,487,624
1,441,904
1,863,225
1,316,682
1,378,300
1,640,913
1,566,178
1,641,642
1,776,653
1,746,371
1,816,923
1,822,998
1,652,181
1,664,983
1,992,273
1,369,740
1,389,644
1,737,933
1,564,119
1,751,936
1,935,028
1,877,899
1,946,689
1,898,067
1,768,817
1,856,989
2,078,412
1,536,252
1,564,282
1,926,551
1,762,119
1,871,077
2,053,961
1,980,940
2,019,198
2,005,836
1,925,817
1,918,411
2,240,908
1,648,657
1,549,275
1,955,470
1,946,112
2,067,987
2,232,342
2,121,051
2,223,576
2,134,985
2,064,504
2,019,895
2,253,852
1,776,898
1,687,355
1,627,596
1,651,937
2,291,842
2,368,495
2,393,597
2,258,489
2,431,920
2,317,685
2,178, 815
2,615,326
2,185, 876
2,317,671
3,029,090
2,768,743
2,795,920
2,804,930
2,623,934
2,627,997
2,648,748
2,504,884
2,576,415
Total Collections 15,427,377 16,587,617 17,440,083 18,209,568 19,887,049 21,089,134 22,642,856 24,204,762 25,238,481 31,499,534
Budget Estimate 14,210,000 15,250,000 16,990,000 17,628,400 18,480,500 19,852,100 20,881,900 22,917,000 21,784,000 25,200,000
Actual over (under) budg 1,217,377 1,337,617 450,083 581,168 1,406,549 1,237,034 1,760,956 1,287,762 3,454,481 6,299,534
Total actual collections
as a % of total budget
% change in annual
total collected
108.57% 108.77% 102.65% 103.30% 107.61% 106.23% 108.43% 105.62% 115.86% 125.00%
3.89% 7.52% 5.14% 4.41% 9.21% 6.04% 7.37% 6.90% 4.27% 24.81%
Chart Reflecting History of Collections through the Month of December
2/24/2022
2020 to 2021
Difference
ok
361,474
408,978
630,316
1,401,494
1,116,806
504,078
436,435
230,337
369,508
216,828
187,199
397,600
16.04%
23.02%
37.36%
86.11%
67.61%
21.99%
18.43%
9.62%
16.36%
8.92%
8.08%
18.25%
6,261,053 24.81 %
35,000,000
30,000,000
25,000,000
20,000,000
15,000,000
10,000,000
5,000,000
0
December
■ December
• November
• October
■ September
• August
■July
■June
on■
May
I
• March
• March
ruary
■Jan• buary
i i i i i i
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
Page 21
P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Tax Revenue\Lodging Tax\2021\105 hotel motel tax 2021 - December
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA
Hotel/Motel Tax Receipts through - December
Actual for the years 2012 through 2021
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
January 21,442
February 21,549
March 25,655
April 52,130
May 37,478
June 43,971
July 52,819
August 57,229
September 64,299
October 43,699
November 39,301
December 30,432
Total Collections
Budget Estimate
Actual over (under) budg
2/24/2022
2020 to 2021
Difference
ok
24,185 25,425 27,092 31,887 27,210 28,752 31,865 36,203 26,006 (10,197) (28.17%)
25,975 26,014 27,111 27,773 26,795 28,878 32,821 31,035 31,041 6 0.02%
27,739 29,384 32,998 34,330 31,601 31,906 40,076 37,395 30,536 (6,859) (18.34%)
40,979 48,246 50,455 52,551 52,242 57,664 59,117 24,959 44,476 19,517 78.20%
40,560 41,123 44,283 50,230 50,112 51,777 53,596 16,906 49,002 32,096 189.85%
47,850 52,618 56,975 55,060 60,637 62,048 73,721 28,910 66,262 37,352 129.20%
56,157 61,514 61,809 65,007 69,337 71,865 84,628 41,836 94,495 52,659 125.87%
63,816 70,384 72,697 73,700 76,972 79,368 91,637 49,772 101,171 51,399 103.27%
70,794 76,100 74,051 70,305 80,173 79,661 97,531 59,116 104,494 45,378 76.76%
43,836 45,604 49,880 55,660 56,631 61,826 77,932 50,844 92,924 42,080 82.76%
42,542 39,600 42,376 46,393 47,090 52,868 59,252 39,694 62,322 22,628 57.01%
34,238 33,256 41,510 33,478 37,180 40,363 41,675 26,573 41,708 15,135 56.96%
490,004
430,000
60,004
518,672
490,000
28,672
549,267
530,000
19,267
581,237
550,000
31,237
596,374
580,000
16,374
615,980
580,000
35,980
646,976
580,000
66,976
743,851
600,000
143,851
443,243
346,000
97,243
744,437
750,000
(5,563)
Total actual collections
as a % of total budget 113.95% 105.85% 103.64% 105.68% 102.82% 106.20% 111.55% 123.98% 128.10% 99.26%
% change in annual
total collected 7.08% 5.85% 5.90% 5.82% 2.60% 3.29% 5.03% 14.97% (40.41%) 67.95%
Chart Reflecting History of Collections through the Month of December
800,000
700,000
600,000
500,000
400,000
300,000
200,000
100,000
0
2012
2013
2014
2015
December
2016
s
2017
2018 2019
301,194 67.95%
1
2020 2021
December
November
October
September
▪ August
■ July
■ June
• May
• April
• March
• February
■ January
Page 22
P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Tax Revenue\REET\2021\301 and 302 REET for 2021 - December
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA
1st and 2nd 1/4% REET Collections through December
Actual for the years 2012 through 2021
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
January 46,359
February 56,115
March 71,730
April 86,537
May 111,627
June 124,976
July 101,049
August 106,517
September 63,517
October 238,095
November 104,886
December 74,300
56,898
155,226
72,172
90,377
116,165
139,112
128,921
117,150
174,070
117,806
78,324
75,429
61,192
67,049
81,724
105,448
198,870
106,676
208,199
172,536
152,323
123,505
172,227
117,682
96,141
103,508
165,868
236,521
165,748
347,421
217,375
202,525
179,849
128,833
129,870
157,919
104,446
83,583
220,637
205,654
192,806
284,897
248,899
231,200
178,046
253,038
186,434
164,180
153,661
124,514
282,724
169,060
202,734
248,768
449,654
472,420
187,348
207,895
229,800
278,995
239,437
146,892
310,562
218,842
646,397
277,424
302,941
261,626
259,492
584,792
263,115
288,912
120,809
199,209
193,913
347,528
263,171
465,044
327,636
300,312
335,824
225,216
319,161
235,726
212,512
242,927
203,774
197,928
258,784
329,801
234,040
365,838
381,224
381,163
370,449
479,586
277,311
283,644
497,974
470,818
380,346
426,592
408,246
666,645
471,991
440,971
1,208,216
685,473
2/24/2022
2020 to 2021
Difference
64,799 30.49%
40,717 16.76%
294,200 144.38%
272,890 137.87%
121,562 46.97%
96,791 29.35%
174,206 74.43%
300,807 82.22%
90,767 23.81%
59,808 15.69%
837,767 226.15%
205,887 42.93%
Total distributed by Spokane County 1,185,707 1,321,650 1,567,429 2,131,578 2,353,822 3,007,573 3,800,432 3,333,549 3,658,026 6,218,227 2,560,201 69.99%
Budget estimate 875,000 975,000 1,100,000 1,400,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 3,000,000 2,800,000 2,000,000 4,000,000
Actual over (under) budget 310,707 346,650 467,429 731,578 353,822 1,007,573 800,432 533,549 1,658,026 2,218,227
Total actual collections
as a % of total budget
% change in annual
total collected
135.51% 135.55%
142.49% 152.26%
117.69% 150.38%
126.68% 119.06%
182.90% 155.46%
23.22% 11.47% 18.60% 35.99% 10.43% 27.77% 26.36% (12.28%) 9.73% 69.99%
Chart Reflecting History of Collections through the Month of December
7,000,000
6,000,000
5,000,000
4,000,000
3,000,000
2,000,000
1,000,000
0
December
1
..:� 9E441k,�1G"
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
• December
• November
• October
• September
• August
• July
■ June
• May
• April
• March
• February
■ January
Page 23
P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Debt Capacity\2022\debt capacity 2022
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA
Debt Capacity
2021 Assessed Value for 2022 Property Taxes 12,919,694,944
Voted (UTGO)
Nonvoted (LTGO)
Voted park
Voted utility
1.00% of assessed value
1.50% of assessed value
2.50% of assessed value
2.50% of assessed value
Maximum
Outstanding
Remaining
Debt
as of
Debt
%
Capacity
12/31/2021
Capacity
Utilized
129,196, 949
193, 795, 424
322, 992, 374
322, 992, 374
968, 977,121
0 129,196, 949
10, 485, 000 183, 310, 424
0 322, 992, 374
0 322, 992, 374
10,485,000 958,492,121
0.00%
5.41%
0.00%
0.00%
1.08%
Bonds
Repaid
Bonds
Remaining
2014 LTGO Bonds
Road &
LTGO Bonds
Period
Street
2016 LTGO
Grand
Ending
CenterPlace
Improvements
Total
Bonds
Total
12/1/2014
12/1/2015
12/1/2016
12/1/2017
12/1/2018
12/1/2019
12/1/2020
12/1/2021
12/1/2022
12/1/2023
12/1/2024
12/1/2025
12/1/2026
12/1/2027
12/1/2028
12/1/2029
12/1/2030
12/1/2031
12/1/2032
12/1/2033
12/1/2034
12/1/2035
12/1/2036
12/1/2037
12/1/2038
12/1/2039
12/1/2040
12/1/2041
12/1/2042
12/1/2043
12/1/2044
12/1/2045
225,000
175,000
185,000
190,000
230,000
255,000
290,000
320,000
135,000
125,000
130,000
130,000
135,000
140,000
140,000
145,000
360,00
300,00
315,000
320,000
365,000
395,000
430,000
465,000
0
0
75,000
150,000
155,000
160,000
165,000
170,000
360,000
300,000
390,000
470,000
520,000
555,000
595,000
635,000
1,870,000 1,080,000
2,950,000 875,000 3,825,000
350,000 150,000 500,000 175,000
390,000 155,000 545,000 180,000
430,000 0 430,000 185,000
465,000 0 465,000 195,000
505,000 0 505,000 00,000
395,000 0 395,000 : 05,000
300,000 0 300,000 215,000
245,000 0 245,000 2 ' 0,000
225,000 0 225,000 2 . 000
180,000 0 180,000 23' , 000
130,000 0 130,000 24 ' 000
165,000 0 165,000 250, 000
0 0 0 260, 100
0 0 0 270, 600
0 0 0 280, 010
0 0 0 290,060
0 0 0 305,001
0 0 0 315,00
0 0 0 330,000
0 0 0 340,000
0 0 0 355,000
0 0 0 365,000
0 0 0 375,000
0 0 0 390,000
675,000
725,000
615,000
660,000
705,000
600,000
515,000
465,000
450,000
415,000
370,000
415,000
260,000
270,000
280,000
290,000
305,000
315,000
330,000
340,000
355,000
365,000
375,000
390,000
3,780,000
305,000 4,085,000 6,400,000 10,485,000
5,650,000 1,385,000 7,035,000 7,275,000 14, 310, 000
Page 24
P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Tax Revenue\MVFT\2021 \motor vehicle fuel tax collections 2021 - December
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA
Motor Fuel (Gas) Tax Collections - December
For the years 2012 through 2021
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
January 159,607
February 135,208
March 144,297
April 153,546
May 144,670
June 159,827
July 160,565
August 164,050
September 171,651
October 153,022
November 162,324
December 138,223
146,145
145,998
135,695
156,529
151,595
167,479
155,348
173,983
195,397
133,441
164,303
142,140
152,906
148,118
131,247
156,269
156,850
161,965
157,805
172,308
173,299
160,539
165,871
141,298
152,598
145,455
140,999
157,994
156,259
164,872
168,205
186,277
174,505
161,520
181,771
153,338
163,918
163,037
145,537
167,304
171,829
157,737
177,427
177,567
194,640
166,369
176,178
152,787
150,654
164,807
138,205
168,000
174,211
174,838
177,019
195,780
184,342
163,780
194,814
154,298
162,359
175,936
139,826
168,796
193,986
144,308
194,267
205,438
180,874
158,062
199,282
148,960
148,530
181,823
131,009
144,080
185,669
175,985
169,733
195,107
180,605
162,187
196,240
155,728
152,686
170,461
146,280
90,589
130,168
128,359
138,932
136,633
195,550
160,272
175,980
119,282
2/24/2022
2020 to 2021
Difference
ok
143,576 (9,110) (5.97%)
150,882 (19,579) (11.49%)
117,784 (28,496) (19.48%)
141,080 50,491 55.74%
175,706 45,538 34.98%
156,670 28,311 22.06%
163,103 24,171 17.40%
185,516 48,883 35.78%
178,022 (17,528) (8.96%)
161,171 899 0.56%
187,269 11,289 6.41%
149,169 29,887 25.06%
Total Collections 1,846,990 1,868,053 1,878,475 1,943,793 2,014,330 2,040,748 2,072,094 2,026,696 1,745,192 1,909,948
Budget Estimate 1,905,800 1,868,900 1,866,400 1,867,700 2,013,400 2,048,900 2,061,100 2,039,500 1,715,000 1,808,700
Actual over (under) budg (58,810) (847) 12,075 76,093 930 (8,152) 10,994 (12,804) 30,192 101,248
Total actual collections
as a % of total budget
% change in annual
total collected
96.91% 99.95% 100.65% 104.07% 100.05% 99.60% 100.53% 99.37% 101.76% 105.60%
(0.58%) 1.14% 0.56% 3.48% 3.63% 1.31% 1.54% (2.19%) (13.89%) 9.44%
Chart Reflecting History of Collections through the Month of December
2,500,000
2,000,000
1,500,000
1,000,000
500,000
0
2012
1
2013
i
2014
•
2015
December
2016
111i
2017
164,756 9.44%
1
2018
1
2019
2020
2021
• December
• November
• October
■ September
• August
■ July
■ June
• May
• April
March
■ February
■ January
Page 25
P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Tax Revenue\Telephone Tax\2021\telephone utility tax collections 2021 - December
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA
Telephone Utility Tax Collections - December
For the years 2012 through 2021
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
Total Collections
Budget Estimate
Actual over (under) budg
Total actual collections
as a % of total budget
% change in annual
total collected
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
193,818
261,074
234,113
229,565
227,469
234,542
226,118
228,789
227,042
225,735
225,319
221,883
217,478
216,552
223,884
214,618
129,270
293,668
213,078
211,929
210,602
205,559
212,947
213,097
210,777
205,953
208,206
206,038
210,010
210,289
205,651
205,645
199,193
183,767
213,454
202,077
177,948
212,845
174,738
214,431
187,856
187,412
190,984
185,172
183,351
183,739
175,235
183,472
182,167
173,971
177,209
171,770
174,512
170,450
174,405
171,909
170,476
166,784
166,823
168,832
162,734
163,300
162,536
157,285
161,506
156,023
157,502
150,644
155,977
153,075
151,208
161,115
130,196
164,060
158,416
146,519
149,434
150,780
147,281
148,158
141,290
142,925
139,209
140,102
136,615
132,538
138,727
126,455
135,704
129,602
130,723
127,303
128,018
127,214
125,027
126,226
123,292
121,596
121,938
120,016
118,018
117,905
120,922
112,351
91,866
90,272
88,212
92,242
7,399
155,911
100,566
83,109
94,863
85,948
86,834
85,251
87,391
86,939
82,797
82,680
2,735,467 2,562,682 2,461,060 2,257,183 2,069,308 1,892,905 1,758,370 1,564,152 1,318,630 1,039,688
3,000,000 2,900,000 2,750,000 2,565,100 2,340,000 2,000,000 1,900,000 1,600,000 1,521,000 1,000,000
(264,533) (337,318) (288,940) (307,917) (270,692) (107,095) (141,630) (35,848) (202,370) 39,688
91.18% 88.37% 89.49% 88.00% 88.43% 94.65% 92.55% 97.76% 86.69% 103.97%
(8.24%) (6.32%) (3.97%) (8.28%) (8.32%) (8.52%) (7.11 %) (11.05%) (15.70%) (21.15%)
Chart Reflecting History of Collections through the Month of December
3,000,000
2,5
00,000
2,0
00,000
1,5
00,000
1,0
00,000
500,000
0
2012
2013
2014
2015
December
lililililililii
2016 2017
2018
2019
2/24/2022
2020 to 2021
Difference
(115,893)
34,315
(21,372)
(36,907)
(23,155)
(31,957)
(34,088)
(27,100)
(4,475)
(3,333)
(5,415)
(9,562)
ok
(94.00%)
28.22%
(17.53%)
(30.75%)
(19.62%)
(27.10%)
(28.19%)
(24.12%)
(4.87%)
(3.69%)
(6.14%)
(10.37%)
(278,942) (21.15%)
2020
• December
• November
• October
• September
• August
■ July
■ June
• May
• April
■ March
• February
• J an ua ry
Page 26