2022, 04-12 Formal MeetingAGENDA
SPOKANE VALLEY CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING
FORMAL FORMAT
Tuesday, April 12, 2022 6:00 p.m.
Remotely via ZOOM Meeting and
In Person at 10210 E Sprague Avenue
Council Requests Please Silence Your Cell Phones During Council Meeting
NOTE: In response to Governor Inslee's announcement reopening Washington under the "Washington
Ready" plan, members of the public may attend Spokane Valley Council meetings in -person at City Hall
at the address provided above, or via Zoom at the link below. Members of the public will be allowed to
comment in -person or via Zoom as described below. Public comments will only be accepted for those
items noted on the agenda as "public comment opportunity." If wishing to make a comment via Zoom,
comments must be received by 4:00 pm the day of the meeting. Otherwise, comments will be taken in -
person at the meeting in Council Chambers, as noted on the agenda below.
• Sign up to Provide Oral Public Comment at the Meeting via Calling -In
• Submit Written Public Comment Prior to the Meeting
• Join the Zoom WEB Meeting
CALL TO ORDER
INVOCATION: Pastor Al Hulten, Valley Assembly Church
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL
APPROVAL OF AGENDA
INTRODUCTION OF SPECIAL GUESTS AND PRESENTATIONS
COMMITTEE, BOARD, LIAISON SUMMARY REPORTS
MAYOR'S REPORT
PROCLAMATION: Public Safety Telecommunicators Week
GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT OPPORTUNITY 111: This is an opportunity for the public to speak
on any subject except agenda action items, as public comments will be taken on those items where indicated.
Please keep comments to matters within the jurisdiction of the City Government. This is not an opportunity
for questions or discussion. Diverse points of view are welcome but please keep remarks civil. Remarks
will be limited to three minutes per person. To comment via zoom: use the link above for oral or written
comments as per those directions. To comment at the meeting in person: speakers may sign in to speak
but it is not required. A sign -in sheet will be provided in Council Chambers. Whether in person or via zoom,
speakers should indicate if they want to speak at General Public Comment Opportunity [1] or [2]
and may only speak at one or the other, but not both.
Council Agenda April 12, 2022 Page 1 of 2
NEW BUSINESS:
1. Consent Agenda: Consists of items considered routine which are approved as a group. Any member of
Council may ask that an item be removed from the Consent Agenda to be considered separately.
Proposed Motion: I move to approve the Consent Agenda.
a. Approval of Claim Vouchers on April 12, 2022, Request for Council Action Form: $3,017,781.55
b. Approval of Payroll for Pay Period Ending March 31, 2022: $634,449.17
c. Approval of Council Meeting Minutes of March 15, 2022 Study Session
d. Approval of Council Meeting Minutes of March 22, 2022 Formal Format
e. Approval of Council Meeting Minutes of March 29, 2022 Study Session
2. Motion Consideration: Pines Grade Separation Project Avista Donation — Gloria Mantz; Avista Business
Manager Melanie Rose [public comment opportunity[
3. Motion Consideration: Law Enforcement lnterlocal Amendment — Erik Lamb, Morgan Koudelka, Chief Ellis
[public comment opportunity]
GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT OPPORTUNITY [21: This is an opportunity for the public to speak
on any subject except agenda action items, as public comments will be taken on those items where indicated.
Please keep comments to matters within the jurisdiction of the City Government. This is not an opportunity
for questions or discussion. Diverse points of view are welcome but please keep remarks civil. Remarks
will be limited to three minutes per person. To comment via zoom: use the link above for oral or written
comments as per those directions. To comment at the meeting in person: speakers may sign in to speak
but it is not required. A sign -in sheet will be provided in Council Chambers. Whether in person or via zoom,
speakers should indicate if they want to speak at General Public Comment Opportunity [1] or [2]
and may only speak at one or the other, but not both.
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS:
4. Third Party Publications in City Building Public Areas - Cary Driskell
5. Balfour Park Phase 1 Update — Bill Helbig
6. Potential RCO (Recreation Conservation Office) Grant Opportunity — John Bottelli
7. Advance Agenda — Mayor Haley
CITY MANAGER COMMENTS:
ADJOURNMENT
Council Agenda April 12, 2022 Page 2 of 2
Spokane
Valleyy
,oCLANA IO7(
CITY oES 'ALLEY
PUBLICSAFETY TELE093131r09VICATaRs WEEK
WHEREAS, 9-1-1 telecommunicators across the state are available around the clock to answer
calls from those in distress; and
WHEREAS, 9-1-1 telecommunicators are also radio lifelines for police officers, firefighters,
and emergency medical personnel who respond to emergencies; and
WHEREAS, 9-1-1 telecommunicators are responsible for a wide range of public warnings,
including AMBER alerts and notification of earthquakes, tsunamis, hazardous
materials releases, and other threats to public safety; and
WHEREAS, countless lives have been saved by the prompt, effective, and compassionate
responses of 9-1-1 telecommunicators; and
WHEREAS, the Washington State Chapter of the Association of Public Safety Communications
Officials (APCO) and National Emergency Number Association (NENA) is
composed of members representing telecommunications from every facet of public
safety in Washington.
NOW, THEREFORE, I, Pam Haley, Mayor of the City of Spokane Valley, on behalf of the
Spokane Valley City Council and the citizens of the City of Spokane Valley, do hereby proclaim
April 10-16, 2022, as
Public Safety Telecommunicators Week
and I encourage all citizens to join me in recognizing the important contributions of this dedicated
group.
Dated this 12th day of April, 2022.
Pam Haley, Mayor
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: April 12, 2022 Department Director Approval: El
Check all that apply; ® consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Approval of the Following Vouchers:
VOUCHER LIST
03/17/2022
03/17/2022
03/22/2022
03/22/2022
03/23/2022
03/23/2022
03/24/2022
03/24/2022
03/31/2022
03/22/2022
VOUCHER NUMBERS
56292-56315
56316-56339
56340-56360
56361-56379
56380-56397
56398-56420
56421-56424
56425
56426-56447
Park refunds 9265-9267
GRAND TOTAL:
TOTAL AMOUNT
225,I55.61
35,939.16
116,536.08
491,397.26
104,017.53
24,723.05
7,512.67
18,278.00
1,994,066.19
156.00
$3,017,781.55
#001 - General Fund
001.011.000.511.
001.013.000.513.
001.013.015.515.
001.016.000.
001.018.013.513.
001.018.014.514.
001.018.016.518.
001.040.041.
001.040.042.
001.040.043.
001.076.000.576.
001.076.300.576.
001.076.301.571.
001.076.302.576.
001.076.304.575.
001.076.305.571.
001.090.000.511.
001.090.000.514.
001.090.000.517.
001.090.000.518.
001.090.000.519.
001.090.000.540.
001.090.000.550.
001.090.000.560.
001.090.000.594
001.090.000.595.
Explanation of Fund Numbers found on Voucher Lists
City Council
City Manager
Legal
Public Safety
Deputy City Manager
Finance
Human Resources
Engineering
Economic Development
Building
Parks & Rec—Administration
Parks & Rec-Maintenance
Parks & Rec-Recreation
Parks & Rec- Aquatics
Parks & Rec- Senior Center
Parks & Rec-CenterPlace
General Gov't- Council related
General Gov't -Finance related
General Gov't -Employee supply
General Gov't- Centralized Serv.
General Gov't -Other Services
General Gov't -Transportation
General Gov't -Natural & Eco.
General Gov't -Social Services
General Gov't -Capital Outlay
General Gov't -Pavement Preserv.
Other Funds:
101 — Street Fund
103 — Paths & Trails
105 — Hotel/Motel Tax
106 — Solid Waste
107 — PEG Fund
108 — Affordable & Supplemental Housing Sales Tax
120 — CenterPlace Operating Reserve
121 — Service Level Stabilization Reserve
122 — Winter Weather Reserve
204 —Debt Service
301 — REET 1 Capital Projects
302 — REET 2 Capital Projects
303 — Street Capital Projects
309 — Parks Capital Grants
310 — Civic Bldg. Capital Projects
311 — Pavement Preservation
312 — Capital Reserve
314 — Railroad Grade Separation Projects
315 — Transportation Impact Fees
316 —Economic Development Capital Projects
402 — Stormwater Management
403 — Aquifer Protection Area
501 — Equipment Rental & Replacement
502 — Risk Management
632 — Passthrough Fees & Taxes
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to approve attached list of claim vouchers.
[Approved as part of the Consent Agenda, or may be removed and discussed separately.]
STAFF CONTACT: Chelsie Taylor, Finance Director
ATTACHMENTS: Voucher Lists
vchlist
03/17/2022 9:30:36AM
Voucher List
Spokane Valley
Page: 1
Bank code :
Voucher
apbank
Date Vendor
Invoice Fund/Dept
56292
3/17/2022 006382 AHBL INC
56293 3/17/2022 007136 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES INC
56294 3/17/2022 004046 AMERICAN ONSITE SERVICES
56295 3/17/2022 008561 B.S. HANSEN INVESTMENTS
56296 3/17/2022 000101 CDW-G
56297 3/17/2022 008469 CORWIN FORD SPOKANE
56298 3/17/2022 007705 CT NORTHWEST
56299 3/17/2022 000683 DAVID EVANS &ASSOCIATES
56300 3/17/2022 002604 DELL FINANCIAL SERVICES LLC
56301 3/17/2022 000734 DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION
130062
1D6L-XYR6-MW3C
1 J7M-1 JF6-69J1
1 JGT-46X6-RLYP
450650
309.000.316.594
001.040.041.543
001.040.043.558
001.090.000.518
101.042.000.543
OVERPAYMENT REFUND 001.000.000.316
S506617
488862
KI022220
KI022221
505181
81212877
81212878
81212879
001.090.000.518
001.040.043.558
101.042.000.594
101.042.000.594
314.000.143.595
001.090.000.548
001.090.000.548
001.090.000.548
RO2727 GROUP 02 101.042.000.542
Description/Account Amount
0316- BALFOUR PARK IMPROVEMENT:
Total :
SUPPLIES: CPW
SUPPLIES: IT
SUPPLIES: IT
Total :
PORTABLE RESTROOM: MAINTENANC
Total:
GAMBLING TAX REFUND
Total:
MEMORY FOR CITY HALL UCS MINI BL
Total :
VEHICLE REPAIR & MAINT.: #4-009
Total :
CONTROLLER - MCDONALD, BROAD1A
TRAFFIC SIGNAL CONTROLLERS - WS
Total:
0143-DESIGN SERVICES
Total :
COMPUTER LEASE: 001-8922117-007
COMPUTER LEASE: 001-8922117-008
COMPUTER LEASE: 001-8922117-010
Total :
WSDOT #GCB 2457 - ILA WITH SRTMC
Total :
40,532.44
40,532.44
44.64
381.14
28.10
453.88
51.07
51.07
900.00
900.00
3,044.39
3,044.39
188.77
188.77
6,732.37
11,614.35
18,346.72
2,356.53
2,356.53
139.58
658.51
187.76
985.85
15,000.00
15,000.00
Page: 1
vchiist
03/1712022 9:30:36AM
Voucher List
Spokane Valley
Page: 2
Bank code: apbank
Voucher Date Vendor
Invoice Fund/Dept
56302 3/17/2022 000734 DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION
56303 3/17/2022 003274 EXCHANGE PUBLISHING LLC
56304 3/17/2022 001447 FREE PRESS PUBLISHING INC
56305 3/17/2022 008422 GMCO CORP DBA ROADWISE
56306 3/17/2022 000007 GRAINGER
56307 3/17/2022 008560 GREENACRES BAPTIST CHURCH
56308 3/17/2022 004621 OREILLYAUTOMOTIVE STORES INC
56309 3/17/2022 008032 PDQ.COM CORPORATION
56310 3/17/2022 005503 SALT DISTRIBUTORS INC,
56311 3/17/2022 005012 SPOKANE CO ENVIRONMENTAL
RE-313-ATB20214058 101,042,000.542
630927
631551
631555
632200
632201
52704
52705
22-1501
9225128884
PARCEL 55191.0516
2862-161061
2862-161098
2862-161099
2862-161467
PDQ11522
4534
311.000.333,595
311.000.333.595
309.000.316.594
106.000.000.537
309.000.316.594
106.000.000.537
309.000.316.594
101.000.000.542
001.040.041.543
303.000.205.595
501.000.000.548
101.000.000.542
101,000,000.542
101.000.000.542
001.090.000.518
101.000.000.542
MARCH 2022 001.076.300.576
Description/Account Amount
REIMBURSE TRAFFIC SVCS
LEGAL PUBLICATION
LEGAL PUBLICATION
LEGAL PUBLICATION
LEGAL PUBLICATION
LEGAL PUBLICATION
LEGAL PUBLICATION
LEGAL PUBLICATION
LIQUID MAG (FREEZEGARD)
Total :
Total :
Total:
Total :
SMALL TOOLS/MINOR EQUIPMENT
Total :
CEP 0205: ROWACQUISITION
Total :
VEHICLE REPAIR & MAINT. SUPPLIES
VEHICLE REPAIR & MAINT. SUPPLIES:
VEHICLE REPAIR & MAINT. SUPPLIES:
VEHICLE REPAIR & MAINT. SUPPLIES:
Total :
PDQ DEPLOY
ICE KICKER
Total :
Total :
1,277.53
1,277.53
72.68
69.00
80.58
46.50
76.50
345.26
110.40
176.00
286.40
13,565.96
13,565.96
17.85
17.85
32,214.00
32,214.00
103.14
20.43
20.43
59.88
203.88
2,940.30
2,940.30
76,334.34
76,334.34
SEWER CHARGES 1,349.24
Page: 2
vchlist
03/17/2022 9:30:36AM
Voucher List Page: 3
Spokane Valley
Bank code : apbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice
56311 3/17/2022 005012 005012 SPOKANE CO ENVIRONMENTAL (Continued)
Fund/Dept
Description/Account Amount
Total: 1,349.24
56312 3/17/2022 000324 SPOKANE CO WATER D[ST #3 MARCH 2022 #1 402.402.000.531 WATER CHARGES FOR MARCH 2022 If 122.86
Total: 122.86
56313 3/17/2022 001903 SPOKANE TRAFFIC CONTROL INC 6547 101.042.000.542 TRAFFIC CONTROL 637.50
Total : 637.50
56314 3/17/2022 002597 TWISTED PAIR ENTERPRISES LLC 2232022 001.011.000.511 BROADCASTING COUNCIL MTGS 1,302.00
Total : 1,302.00
56315 3/17/2022 004800 URS ELECTRONICS INC 794418 101.042.000.594 TRAFFIC CAMERA REPLACEMENT 12,698.84
Total : 12,698.84
24 Vouchers for bank code : apbank Bank total : 225,155.61
24 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers : 225,155.61
Page: 3
vchlist
03/17/2022 1:49:36PM
Voucher List
Spokane Valley
Page: 1
Bank code : apbank
Voucher Date Vendor
Invoice Fund/Dept
56316 3/17/2022 000197 ACRANET
56317 3/17/2022 001117 BASINGER, MICHAEL
19630
EXPENSES
56318 3/17/202.2 008053 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, PETTY CASH REI MARCH 2022
56319 3/17/2022 001447 FREE PRESS PUBLISHING INC
56320 3/17/2022 008551 GOPHER LLC
56321 3/17/2022 001253 GORDON THOMAS HONEYWELL
56322 3/17/2022 008107 GORDON THOMAS HONEYWELL LLP
56323 3/17/2022 000007 GRAINGER
56324 3/17/2022 001635 ISS FACILITY EVENT SERVICES
56325 3/17/2022 008453 KOTTKAMP, YEDINAK & ESWORTHY
52678
52681
52682
52683
6204
6205
6206
6207
6208
Feb 2022 1042
911228
9228085669
1597424
2606
001.018.016.518
001.040.042.558
001.040.043.558
001.040.042.558
001.040.043.558
001.013.000.513
001.040.043.558
001.013.015.515
001.013.015.515
001.0 1 3.015.515
001.013.015.515
001.013.015.515
001.011.000.511
001.013.015.515
001.033.033.518
001.076.305.575
001.040.043.558
Description/Account Amount
EMPLOYEE BACKGROUND CHECKS
Total :
EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH: 25500, 22151
LEGAL PUBLICATION
LEGAL PUBLICATION
LEGAL PUBLICATION
LEGAL PUBLICATION
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Total :
Total:
Total :
Total:
GOVERNMENTALAFFAIRS SERVICES
Total :
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES RENDERS!
Total :
JANITORIAL SUPPLIES: CITY HALL
Total :
FEBRUARY 2022 MONTHLY CLEANING
Total:
35.00
35.00
10.00
10.00
1.60
1.60
222.40
93.50
34.00
95.20
445.10
140.00
70.00
50.00
70.00
70.00
400.00
5,225.00
5,225.00
105.00
105.00
56.09
56.09
8,085.09
8,085.09
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,890.00
Total : 1,890.00
Page:
14
vchlist
03/17/2022 1:49:36PM
Voucher List
Spokane Valley
Page: 2
Bank code :
Voucher
apbank
Date Vendor
Invoice Fund/Dept
56326 3/17/2022 001944 LANCER LTD
56327 3/17/2022 002259 MENKE JACKSON BEYER LLP
0482278
476 2-28-2022
492 2-28-2022
56328 3/17/2022 004048 MOUNTAIN CONSULTING SVCS LLC 22-027
56329 3/17/2022 004850 NAVIA BENEFIT SOLUTIONS, HRA PLAN 10442647
56330 3/17/2022 000652 OFFICE DEPOT INC. 229422561001
229427302001
56331 3/17/2022 004130 PACIFICA LAW GROUP LLP
56332 3/17/2022 007280 PATTERSON, MARCI
56333 3/17/2022 006427 RETAIL STRATEGIES LLC
56334 3/17/2022 000230 SPOKANE COAUDITORS OFFICE
56335 3/17/2022 000658 SPOKANE CO SUPERIOR COURT
56336 3/17/2022 000065 STAPLES ADVANTAGE
56337 3/17/2022 004740 THOMSON REUTERS-WEST
74531
EXPENSES
528-6A
FEBRUARY 2022
13212 E HEROY
3501265402
3501265407
845959263
001.040.000.518
001.013.015.515
001.013.015.515
001.040.043.524
001.018.016.518
001.013.015.515
001.013.015.515
001.090.331.514
001.013.000.513
001.040.042.558
001.040.043.558
001.013.015.515
001.040.043.558
001.040.043.558
001.013.015.515
EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT
PROFESSIONAL CONSULTING
RECORDING FEES
COURT FILING
OFFICE SUPPLIES: BLDG
OFFICE SUPPLIES: BLDG
SUBSCRIPTION CHARGES
Description/Account Amount
BUSINESS CARDS
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Total:
Total :
CLEANUP OF DEBRIS: CODE ENFORC
Total :
FLEX SPENDING ADMINISTRATION
Total :
OFFICE SUPPLIES: LEGAL
OFFICE SUPPLIES: LEGAL
Total :
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES RE: CLFRF
Total :
Total :
Total:
Total :
Total :
Total:
185.18
185.18
2,125.80
1,426.70
3,552.50
855.00
855.00
396.00
396.00
39.30
127.43
166.73
2,403.00
2,403.00
34.51
34.51
7,000.00
7,000.00
1,919.00
1,919.00
240.00
240.00
44.39
69.17
113.56
872.30
Page:
5
vchlist Voucher List Page: 3
03/1712022 1:49:36PM Spokane Valley
Bank code: apbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice
56337 3/17/2022 004740 004740 THOMSON REUTERS-WEST (Continued)
56338 3/17/2022 003206 VAN NESS FELDMAN LLP
56339 3/17/2022 008557 YOURMEMBERSHIP.COM INC
Fund/Dept
Description/Account Amount
Total : 872.30
432129 001.013.015.515 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,449.50
Total : 1,449.50
R55755928
001.018.016.518 JOB POSTING: DEPUTY CITY ATTORNI 499.00
Total : 499.00
24 Vouchers for bank code : apbank Bank total : 35,939.16
24 Vouchers in this report
1, the undersigned, do certify under penalty of perjury,
that the materials have been furnished, the services
rendered, or the labor performed as described herein
and that the claim is just, due and an unpaid
obligation against the City of Spokane Valley, and that
l am authorized to authenticate and certify said claim.
Finance Director Date
Council member reviewed:
Mayor Date
Council Member Date
Total vouchers : 35,939.16
vchlist
03122/2022 3:05:50PM
Voucher List
Spokane Valley
Page: '1
Bank code: apbank
Voucher
Date Vendor
Invoice Fund/Dept
56340 3/22/2022 000648 ABADAN REPROGRAPHICS 128034
56341 3122/2022 003337 ARROW CONSTRUCTION SUPPLY INC 327401
56342 3/22/2022 000030 AVISTA
56343 3/22/2022 007637 COMMONSTREET CONSULTING LLC
56344 3/22/2022 001880 CROWN WEST REALTY LLC
56345 3/22/2022 000683 DAVID EVANS &ASSOCIATES
56346 3/22/2022 000734 DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION
56347 3/22/2022 003261 FEHR & PEERS
55348 3/22/2022 000002 H & H BUSINESS SYSTEMS INC.
56349 3/22/2022 007671 HORROCKS ENGINEERS INC
FEBRUARY 2022
FEBRUARY 2022
CSROW 21269
MARCH 2022
505528
RE-31 C-LA9844FINAL
152916
AR229347
AR229348
AR229349
AR229350
AR229351
AR229352
AR229353
AR229354
AR229355
303.000.249.595
101.042.000.542
101.042.000.542
001.076.302.576
303.000.205.595
101.042.000.543
303.000.300.595
303.000.310.595
314.000.311.595
001.011.000.511
001.018.017.518
001.018.016.518
001.013.000.513
001.013.015.515
001.040.043.558
001.040.041.543
101.042.000.542
001.076.000.576
67177 309.000.338.595
Description/Account Amount
CIP 0249: PRINT SERVICE
Total:
COLDMIX - EZ STREET POTHOLE PAT(
Total :
UTILITIES; CPW MASTER VISTA FEBRI
UTILITIES: PARKS MASTER AVISTA FEE
Total :
0205-RIGHT-OF-WAY SERVICES
Total :
COMMON AREA CHARGES MAINTENAI
Total :
0300-TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Total :
CIP 0310: BALANCE DUE FOR AGENC'
Total :
0311- SULLIVAN RD/SR 290
Total :
COPIER COSTS: WEST WINGICOUNCII
COPIER COSTS: IT
COPIER COSTS: HR
COPIER COSTS: OPS/A❑MIN
COPIER COSTS: LEGAL
COPIER COSTS: PERMIT CENTER
COPIER COSTS: CPW ENGINEERING
COPIER COSTS: MAINTENANCE SHOF
COPIER COSTS: CENTERPLACE
Total :
353.76
353.76
1,078.11
1,078.11
27,495.02
8,755.66
36,251.68
5,527.56
5,527.56
156.82
156.82
2,340.68
2,340.68
352.67
352.67
1,765.40
1,765.40
98.08
6.90
27.05
235.03
111.80
57.28
475.19
7.44
136.80
1,155.57
0338- LOOP TRAIL PROJECT 31,447.02
Page:
l�
1
vchlist
03/22/2022 3:05:50PM
Voucher List
Spokane Valley
Page: 2
Bank code : apbank
Voucher Date Vendor
Invoice Fund/Dept
56349 3/22/2022 007671
007671 HORROCKS ENGINEERS INC
56350 3/22/2022 008562 MUNDERLOH, JOSH
56351 3/22/2022 000652 OFFICE DEPOT INC.
56352 3/22/2022 000307 OFFICE OF THE STATE TREASURER
56353 3/22/2022 002424 PITNEY BOWES GLOBAL
56354 3/22/2022 005968 PRECISE MRM LLC
56355 3/22/2022 008565 SCH ENTERPRISES
56356 3/2212022 000308 SPOKANE CO PROSECUTING ATTY
56357 3/22/2022 004099 SPOKANE VALLEYACE HARDWARE
56358 3/22/2022 000405 SPOKANE VALLEY PARTNERS
56359 3/22/2022 000065 STAPLES ADVANTAGE
(Continued)
2021-10169854
230576391001
230594094001
230594511001
230594513001
231539731001
231547712001
231974943001
FEBRUARY 2022
3315254762
200-1035739
ESTIMATE 6927
FEBRUARY 2022
029381
2022 #2
3501265408
3501265412
001.016.000.342
001.040.041.543
001,018,014.514
001.018.014.514
001.018.014.514
001.018.014.514
001.018.014.514
001.018.014.514
632.000.000.589
001.090.000.518
402.402.000.531
403.000.317.595
632.000.000.589
101.042.000.642
001.090.000.560
001.090.000.518
001,090,000.518
Description/Account
Amount
Total :
FALSE ALARM REFUND:2021-1016985•
Total :
OFFICE SUPPLIES: CPW
OFFICE SUPPLIES: FINANCE
OFFICE SUPPLIES: FINANCE
OFFICE SUPPLIES: FINANCE
OFFICE SUPPLIES: FINANCE
OFFICE SUPPLIES: FINANCE
OFFICE SUPPLIES: FINANCE
STATE REMITTANCE
LEASE CONTRACT 0040941959
DATA PLAN
Total:
Total:
Total:
Total :
BOLLARDS FOR CIP-0317: 50% DOWN
Total:
CRIME VICTIMS COMPENSATION REM
Total
EQUIPMENT REPAIR
Total :
2022 EDSS GRANT REIMBURSEMENT
Total:
KITCHEN SUPPLIES
KITCHEN SUPPLIES
31,447.02
65.00
65.00
72.81
47.20
179.15
17.96
129.87
90.88
3.51
541.38
22,782.66
22,782.66
967.20
967.20
272.50
272.50
4,580.33
4,580.33
323.34
323.34
21.78
21.78
6,145.05
6,145.05
100.47
95.96
Page:
vchlist Voucher List Page: 3
03/22/2022 3:05:50PM Spokane Valley
Bank code: apbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount
56359 3/22/2022 000065 000065 STAPLES ADVANTAGE (Continued)
Total: 196.43
56360 3/22/2022 008532 TICOR TITLE CO 6602108486-2 303.000.318.595 CEP 0318: RECORDING FEES 211.14
Total: 211.14
21 Vouchers for bank code : apbank Bank total : 116,536.08
21 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers : 116,536.08
I, the undersigned, do certify under penalty of perjury,
that the materials have been furnished, the services
rendered, or the labor performed as described herein
and that the claim is just, due and an unpaid
obligation against the City of Spokane Valley, and that
I am authorized to authenticate and certify said claim.
Finance Director Date
Council member reviewed:
Mayor Date
Council Member Date
Page:
Nik
vchlist Voucher List Page:
03122/2022 3:44:08PM Spokane Valley
Bank code : apbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount
56361 3/22/2022 000958 AAA SWEEPING LLC 72400 402.402.000.531 STREET SWEEPING FEBRUARY 2022 26,271.52
Total : 26,271.52
56362 3/22/2022 004046 AMERICAN ONSITE SERVICES 444875 101.042.000.543 PORTABLE RESTROOM: MAINTENANC 110.00
Total : 110.00
56363 3/22/2022 003337 ARROW CONSTRUCTION SUPPLY INC 326299 101.042.000.542 COLDMIX- EZ STREET POTHOLE PAT( 1,464.92
Total : 1,464.92
56364 3/22/2022 002891 BASIN SOD INCORPORATED 55759 101.000.000.542 SUPPLIES: STREET 28.75
Total : 28.75
56365 3/22/2022 008469 CORWIN FORD SPOKANE 490631 101.042.000.542 VEHICLE REPAIR & MAINT.: #5-202 354.75
Total : 354.75
56366 3/22/2022 002920 DIRECTV INC 051738547X220305 101.042.000.543 CABLE SERVICE FOR MAINTENANCE : 79.99
Total : 79.99
56367 3/22/2022 002157 ELJAY OIL COMPANY 4325433 001.040.041.543 FUEL FOR MAINTENANCE SHOP VEHU 5,483.90
Total : 5,483.90
56368 3/22/2022 007947 INTERSTATE BATTERIES OF E WASH 20176765 402.402.000.531 VEHICLE REPAIR & MAINT. SUPPLIES: 133.89
Total : 133.89
56369 3/22/2022 006381 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC 9309313127 101.000.000.542 VEHICLE REPAIR & MAINT. SUPPLIES: 25.58
9309364916 501.000.000.548 VEHICLE REPAIR & MAINT. SUPPLIES 348.99
Total : 374,57
56370 3/22/2022 002203 NAPAAUTO PARTS 0538-075679 001.040.043.558 VEHICLE REPAIR & MAINT. SUPPLIES: 77.99
0538-088008 101.000.000.542 VEHICLE REPAIR & MAINT. SUPPLIES: 25.81
0538-098844 101.000.000.542 VEHICLE REPAIR & MAINT. SUPPLIES: 25.41
Total : 129.21
56371 3/22/2022 000652 OFFICE DEPOT INC. 230594509001 001.018.014.514 OFFICE SUPPLIES: FINANCE 19.59
231974943002 001.018.014.514 OFFICE SUPPLIES: FINANCE 84.72
232984516001 001.018.014.514 OFFICE SUPPLIES: FINANCE 31.90
Page:
vehlist
03122(2022 3:44:08PM
Voucher List
Spokane Valley
Page: 2
Bank code: apbank
Voucher
Date Vendor
Invoice Fund/Dept
56371 3/22/2022 000652 000652 OFFICE DEPOT INC.
56372 3/22/2022 004621 OREILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORES INC
56373 3122/2022 006220 PAPE MACHINERY INC
56374 3/22/2022 001089 POE ASPHALT PAVING INC,
56375 3/22(2022 000001 SPOKANE CO TREASURER
56376 3/22/2022 000324 SPOKANE CO WATER DIST#3
56377 3/22/2022 000093 SPOKESMAN -REVIEW, THE
56378 3/22/2022 001969 SUNSHINE DISPOSAL
56379 3/22/2022 007970 WILLIAMS SCOTSMAN INC
19 Vouchers for bank code : apbank
19 Vouchers in this report
(Continued)
2862-161870
2862-163249
2862-153261
2862-164718
2862-164806
2862-164979
70415602
46959
42000980
42000981
51506211
51506220
51506248
MARCH 2022 #2
14587
1878029
9013343201
501.000.000.548
501.000.000.548
501.000.000.548
101.000.000.542
001.040.043.558
501.000.000.548
101.000.000.542
101.000.000.542
001.016.000.554
001.016.000.554
001.016.000.523
001.016.000.523
001.016.000.523
402.402.000.531
106.000.000.537
101.042.000.542
101.000.000.542
Description/Account Amount
Total :
VEHICLE REPAIR & MAINT, SUPPLIES
SMALL TOOLS/MINOR EQUIPMENT
VEHICLE REPAIR & MAINT. SUPPLIES
VEHICLE REPAIR & MAINT. SUPPLIES:
VEHICLE REPAIR & MAINT. SUPPLIES:
VEHICLE REPAIR & MAINT. SUPPLIES
Total :
EQUIPMENT RENTAL: GRADER FOR 1A
Total :
WINTER RESPONSE 2022
Total :
ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES APRIL 2(
1ST HALF DEBT SERVICE 2022
JANUARY 2022 INMATE HOUSING
FEBRUARY 2022 INMATE HOUSING
MARCH 2022 INMATE HOUSING
Total :
WATER CHARGES FOR MARCH 2022 #
Total :
ADVERTISING ACCT 102969
Total :
TRANSFER STATION CPW FEBRUARY
Total :
MOBILE OFFICE RENTAL
136.21
44.64
14.15
32.64
60.94
62.39
29.65
244.41
6,534.00
6,534.00
39,338.50
39,338.50
23, 830.06
22, 500.00
120,489.30
120,489.30
120,489.30
407,797.96
178.20
178.20
2,396.60
2,396.50
328.99
328.99
10.89
Total : 10.89
Bank total : 491,397.26
Total vouchers : 491,397.26
Page:
vchlist
03123/2022 9:03:13AM
Voucher List
Spokane Valley
Page: 1
Bank code : apbank
Voucher Date Vendor
Invoice Fund/Dept
56380 3/23/2022 007136 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES INC
56381 3/23/2022 003337 ARROW CONSTRUCTION SUPPLY INC
56382 3/23/2022 008023 ARROW PROPANE LLC
56383 3/23/2022 008216 BERRYDUNN
56384 3/23/2022 007637 COMMONSTREET CONSULTING LLC
56385 3/23/2022 000007 GRAINGER
56386 3/23/2022 002043 HDR ENGINEERING INC
56387 3/23/2022 002538 HYDRAULICS PLUS INC
56388 3/23/2022 002518 INLAND PACIFIC HOSE & FITTINGS
56389 3/23/2022 000662 NAT'L BARRICADE & SIGN CO
1X4V-Y17X-T6DL
327872
327951
327952
327953
4367
413643
CSROW 22006
CSROW 22007
CSROW 22008
CSROW 22055
CSROW 22056
CSROW 22057
9239509467
1200413307
24453
1083188
1083710
001.090.000.518
101.042.000.542
101.042.000.542
101.042.000.542
101.042.000,542
101.042.000.542
001.090.000.513
314.000.223.595
303.000.205.595
403.000.320.595
314,000,223.595
303.000.205.595
403.000.320.595
101.000.000.542
314.000.223.595
101.000.000.542
101.000.000.542
101.000.000,542
210623 101.042.000.542
DescriptionlAccount Amount
SUPPLIES: IT
Total :
REPAIR & MAINT. SUPPLIES: STREET
CRAFCO MASTIC PLEXIMELT
SAFETY SUPPLIES: STREET
PLEXIMELT
SUPPLIES: STREET DEPT.
CONSULTING SERVICES
0223-RIGHT-OF-WAY SERVICES
0205-RIGHT-OF-WAY SERVICES
0320 SULLIVAN PRESERVATION
0223-RIGHT-OF-WAY SERVICES
0205-RIGHT-OF-WAY SERVICES
0320 SULLIVAN PRESERVATION
SUPPLIES: STREET
Total :
Total :
Total :
Total:
Total :
0223-FINAL ENGINEERING DESIGN
Total :
REPAIR SERVICE: CYLINDER
Total :
VEHICLE REPAIR & MAINT. SUPPLIES:
VEHICLE REPAIR & MAINT. SUPPLIES:
Total:
26.11
26.11
31.58
3,430.35
20.28
8,575.88
12,058.09
122.35
122.35
6,600.00
6,600.00
513.49
9,052.26
2,487.50
742.80
1,968.72
150.00
14,914.77
15.29
15.29
61,860.75
61,860.75
431.17
431.17
152.05
104.59
256.64
MARKER POSTS & BANDS 1,225.13
Page: a►
L.
vchlist
03/23/2022 9:03:13AM
Voucher List
Spokane Valley
Page: 2
Sank code : apbank
Voucher Date Vendor
Invoice FundlDept
56389 3/23/2022 000662 NAT'L BARRICADE & SIGN CO
56390 3/23/2022 003090 NORTH 40 OUTFITTERS
56391 3/23/2022 001860 PLATT ELECTRIC SUPPLY
56392 3/23/2022 002193 QSCEND TECHNOLOGIES INC
56393 3/23/2022 007741 REFRIGERATION SUPPLIES DIST
56394 3/23/2022 003208 RODDA PAINT CO.
56395 3/23/2022 002520 RWC GROUP
56398 3/23/2022 000709 SENSKE LAWN & TREE CARE INC.
56397 3/23/2022 004247 SIX STATES DISTRIBUTORS INC
18 Vouchers for bank code : apbank
18 Vouchers in this report
(Continued)
210624
105289/3
2P01632
INV222291
16283836-00
9531614
XA106026832:01
XA106027432:01
XA106027432:02
XA106027439:01
XA106027716:01
XA106027763:01
XA106028234:01
12719880
23 023094
23 023098
101.042.000.542
101.042.000.542
101.000.000.542
001.018.013.513
101.000.000.542
101.042.000.542
101.000.000.542
101.000.000.542
101.000.000.542
101.000.000.542
101.000.000.542
101.000.000.542
101.000.000.542
101.042.000.542
101.000.000.542
101.000.000.542
Description/Account Amount
MARKER POSTS
Total:
REPAIR & MAINT. SUPPLIES: STREET
Total :
VEHICLE REPAIR & MAINT. SUPPLIES:
Total :
SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE
Total :
REPAIR & MAINT. SUPPLIES: MAINT. SI
Total :
SUPPLIES: STREET
Total :
CREDIT RE INVOICE XA106024613:01
VEHICLE REPAIR & MAINT. SUPPLIES:
VEHICLE REPAIR & MAINT. SUPPLIES:
VEHICLE REPAIR & MAINT. SUPPLIES:
VEHICLE REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES:
VEHICLE REPAIR & MAINT. SUPPLIES:
VEHICLE REPAIR & MAINT. SUPPLIES:
Total :
895 CONTRACT MAINTENANCE
Total :
SERVICE FOR SNOW PLOW
VEHICLE REPAIR & MAINT. SUPPLIES:
Total :
2,450.25
3,675.38
7.15
7.15
250.40
250.40
600.00
600.00
376.06
376.06
60.16
60.16
-54.54
16.48
123.69
192.67
70.74
161.23
68.04
578.31
531.43
531.43
1,074.45
579.02
1,663.47
Bank total : 104,017.53
Total vouchers : 104,017.53
Page:
13
vchlist
03/2312022 10:28:0 9A M
Voucher List
Spokane Valley
Page: 1
Bank code :
Voucher
apbank
Date Vendor
Invoice Fund/Dept
56398 3/2312022 000150 ALLIED FIRE & SECURITY
56399
3/23/2022 001081 ALSCO
56400 3/23/2022 007965 ARGUS JANITORIAL
56401 3/23/2022 000918 BLUE RIBBON LINEN SUPPLY INC
56402 3/23/2022 001770 CONSOLIDATED SUPPLY CO
56403 3/2312022 000823 DEPT OF LABOR & INDUSTRIES
56404 3/23/2022 000795 EARTHWORKS RECYCLING INC.
56405 3/23/2022 007871 EMPIRE SPRAY SERVICE INC
56406 3/23/2022 003274 EXCHANGE PUBLISHING LLC
Description/Account Amount
1151728 001.076.305.575 SECURITY SERVICES AT CENTERPLA(
Total :
LSPO2498174
LSPO2502519
001.016.016.621
001.016.016.521
FLOOR MAT SERVICE AT PRECINCT
FLOOR MAT SERVICE AT PRECINCT
Total :
INV12106 001.016.016.521 JANITORIAL SVCS: PRECINCT, MAINT.
Total :
0333128
0336901
0338811
S0285740
S0287023
S010665243.001
S010691910.001
001.076.305.575
001.076.305.575
001.076.305.575
001.076.305.575
001.076.305.575
001.076.305.575
001.076.305.575
LINEN SERVICE AND SUPPLY AT CENT
LINEN SERVICE AND SUPPLY AT CENT
LINEN SERVICE AND SUPPLY AT CENT
LINEN SERVICE AND SUPPLY AT CENT
LINEN SERVICE AND SUPPLY AT CENT
Total:
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: CENTERPL
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: CENTERPL
Total :
344820 001.033.033.518 BOILER/PRESSURE VESSEL INSPECT!
Total :
368325 001.076.305.575 RECYCLING COLLECTION AT CENTER
Total :
48190 001.033.033.518 SPRING WEED FREE SHRUB BEDS: CI
Total :
632936
633595
633596
633597
633598
633600
633601
001.040.043.558
001.040.043.558
001.013.000.513
001.013.000.513
001.013.000.513
001.040.043.558
001.040.042.558
LEGAL PUBLICATION
LEGAL PUBLICATION
LEGAL PUBLICATION
LEGAL PUBLICATION
LEGAL PUBLICATION
LEGAL PUBLICATION
LEGAL PUBLICATION
176.99
176.99
30.43
30.43
60.86
3,950.00
3,950.00
345.43
75.00
75.00
202.01
184.10
881.54
322.81
34.36
357.17
28.40
28.40
20.00
20.00
626.18
626.18
86.90
82.50
26.86
46.61
35.55
82.95
27.65
vchlist
03123/2022 10:28:09AM
Voucher List
Spokane Valley
Page: 2
Bank code: apbank
Voucher Date Vendor
Invoice FundlDept
56406 3/23/2022 003274 EXCHANGE PUBLISHING LLC
56407 3/23/2022 001447 FREE PRESS PUBLISHING INC
56408 3/23/2022 008551 GOPHER LLC
56409 3123/2022 000007 GRAINGER
56410 3/23/2022 001147 HOBART SERVICE
56411 3/23/2022 000012 JOURNAL OF BUSINESS
56412 3/23/2022 001002 M & L SUPPLY CO INC
56413 3/23/2022 002259 MENKE JACKSON BEYER LLP
56414 3/23/2022 001860 PLATT ELECTRIC SUPPLY
56415 3/23/2022 002592 PURE FILTRATION PRODUCTS
56416 3/23/2022 007678 RANDALL DANSKIN PS
(Continued)
633602
52744
52746
52747
52748
6213
9224452475
28684713
329200
S100479328.002
S100482815.001
486 2-28-2022
2N88375
2033999
2046858
73006
001.040.042.558
001.040.043.558
001.013.000.513
001.013.000.513
001.040.043.558
001.013.015.515
001.076.305.575
001.076.305.575
001.076.305.575
001.076.305.575
001.076.305.575
303.000.313.595
001.076.305.575
001.076.305.575
001.076.305.575
001.076.305.575
144373 001.000.322.518
Description/Account
Amount
LEGAL PUBLICATION
LEGAL PUBLICATION
LEGAL PUBLICATION
LEGAL PUBLICATION
LEGAL PUBLICATION
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Total :
Total :
Total :
REPAIR & MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: C
Total :
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES FOR CENTE
Total :
ADVERTISING FOR CENTERPLACE
Total :
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: CENTERPL
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: CENTERPL
Total :
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Total:
REPAIR & MAINT. SUPPLIES: CENTERF
REPAIR & MAINT. SUPPLIES: CENTERF
REPAIR & MAINT. SUPPLIES: CENTERF
Total :
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: CENTERPL
Total:
22.12
411.14
192.00
31.45
31.45
96.05
350.95
75.40
75.40
112.56
112.56
416.81
416.81
1,240.00
1,240.00
241.47
242.15
483.62
1,418.00
1,418.00
106.73
35.28
46.20
188.21
254.17
254.17
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 12,264.91
vchlist
0312312022 10:28:09AM
Voucher List
Spokane Valley
Page: 3
Bank code: apbank
Voucher
Date Vendor
Invoice FundlDept
56416 3123/2022 007678 007678 RANDALL DANSKIN PS
56417 3/23/2022 007741 REFRIGERATION SUPPLIES DIST
56418 3/23/2022 001083 STANDARD PLBG HEATING CONTROLS
56419 312312022 000066 WCP SOLUTIONS
56420 3/23/2022 000310 WSAMA
23 Vouchers for bank code : apbank
23 Vouchers in this report
(Continued)
16284674-00
16284700-00
63093
12672443
2022 SPRING CONF
001.076.305.575
001.033.033.518
001.076.305.575
001.076.305.575
001.013.015.515
Description/Account Amount
Total
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: CENTERPL
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: CITY HALL
Total:
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: CENTERPL
Total :
JANITORIAL SUPPLIES: CENTERPLACI
Total
REGISTRATION: 2022 SPRING CONFEI
Total:
Bank total :
12,264.91
143.31
42.22
185.53
252.94
252.94
497.67
497.67
470.00
470.00
24,723.05
Total vouchers : 24,723.05
Page:
I6
vchlist Voucher List Page:
03/24/2022 7:40:07AM Spokane Valley
Bank code : apbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice FundlDept DescriptionlAccount Amount
56421 3/24/2022 001606 BANNER BANK 5138 FEB 2022 001.018.016.518 HILTON GARDEN INN: S. DEHN -WELL 260.50
5138 FEB 2022 001.018.016.518 APPLE.COM: DEVELOPER PROGRAM I 107.81
5138 FEB 2022 001.040.041.558 ASCE MEMBERSHIP - J. WADIE 275.00
5138 FEB 2022 001.040.041.558 WAASPHALT PAVEMENTASSOC.: TRA 65.00
5138 FEB 2022 309.000.338.595 CIP 0338: BNSF RAIL PERMITTING 1,398.00
5138 FEB 2022 001.033.033.518 LOWE'S: REPAIR & MAINT. SUPPLIES - 41.35
5138 FEB 2022 001.018.016.518 INDEED.COM: JOB POSTINGS 45.75
5138 FEB 2022 001.040.042.558 ESRI: 2022 CONFERENCE & DEVELOP 399.00
5138 FEB 2022 001.090.000.518 AMAZON WEB SERVICES: COUNTY SI- 29.28
5138 FEB 2022 001.018.016.518 CRAIGS LIST: JOB POSTING - ECON. D 25.00
5138 FEB 2022 001.018.016.518 CRAIGS LIST: JOB POSTING - DEPUTY 25.00
Total : 2,671.69
56422 3/24/2022 001606 BANNER BANK 5153 FEB 2022 101.042.000.542 WAASPHALT PAVEMENTASSOC.: TRA 65.00
5153 FEB 2022 106.000.000.537 WSRA: ANNUAL CONFERENCE - H. ALI 600.00
5153 FEB 2022 001.040.041.558 ASCE: MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL- CHAI 270.00
5153 FEB 2022 001.018.014.514 WFOA: BARS BASICS - S. MATTOX 100.00
5153 FEB 2022 001.040.042.558 FACEBOOK: AD FOR CENTERPLACE 10.79
5153 FEB 2022 001.018.014.514 EVENTBRITE: MRSC LODGING TAX BA 70.00
5153 FEB 2022 101.042.000.542 APWA: MEMBERSHIP - SHANE ARLT 247.00
5153 FEB 2022 001.040.041.543 CRAIGSLIST: JOB POSTING FOR ENGII 25.00
5153 FEB 2022 001.040.041.543 ADZUNA: JOB POSTING - ENGINEERII\ 99.89
5153 FEB 2022 101.042.000.542 APWA: REGISTRATION FOR SNOW CC 575.00
5153 FEB 2022 001.040.041.543 LINKEDIN: JOB POSTING FOR ENGINE 79.17
5153 FEB 2022 001,040,042.558 GREATER SPOKANE INC: REGISTRATI 55.00
5153 FEB 2022 101.042.000.542 INSTITUTE OF TRANSPORTATION ENC 495.00
5153 FEB 2022 001.040.041.543 LINKEDIN: JOB POSTING - ENGINEER! 48.65
5153 FEB 2022 001.013.015.515 TRUEFILING: COURT FEES 247.20
5153 FEB 2022 001.013.015.515 TRUEFILING: ERRONEOUS FILING WIT 85.00
5153 FEB 2022 001.013.015.515 TRUEFILING: CREDIT RE ERRONEOU; -85.00
5153 FEB 2022 001.040.041.543 LINKED IN: JOB POSTING FOR ECONC 92.02
Total : 3,079.72
56423 3/24/2022 001606 BANNER BANK 5161 FEB 2022 001.033.033,518 LOWE'S: SMALL TOOLS - CITY HALL 33.37
5161 FEB 2022 001.033.033.518 HARBOR FREIGHT: SMALL TOOLS FOF 119.63
5161 FEB 2022 001.016.016.521 ROBERT BROOKE & ASSOC: REPAIR F. 84.19
vchlist Voucher List Page: 2
03124/2022 7:40:07AM Spokane Valley
Bank code: apbank
Voucher Date Vendor invoice FundlDept DescriptionlAccount Amount
56423 3/2412022 001606 BANNER BANK (Continued)
5161 FEB 2022 001.033.033.518 CHICAGO FAUCET SHOPPE: REPAIR 5 442.99
5161 FEB 2022 001,016,016.521 GTS DRYWALL: CEILING TILE FOR PRI 340.91
5161 FEB 2022 001.016.016.521 LOWE'S: PAINT FOR PRECINCT 13.04
5161 FEB 2022 001.040.044.558 MRSC: REGISTRATION FOR'PROCES: 35.00
5161 FEB 2022 001.033.033.518 QUILL: TONER COLLECTION UNIT- CI- 50.73
5161 FEB 2022 001.033.034.518 MORAN FENCE: RENTAL FOR 4908 E 1 163.50
5161 FEB 2022 001.033.033.518 GLOBAL INDUSTRIAL: JANITOR CART • 242.90
Total : 1,526.26
56424 3/24/2022 001606 BANNER BANK 5120 FEB 2022 001.011.000.511 INNOVIA FOUNDATION: 2022 COMMUN 50.00
5120 FEB 2022 001.011.000.511 GREATER SPOKANE INC: ANNUAL CEI 55.00
5120 FEB 2022 001.011.000.511 GREATER SPOKANE VALLEY CHAMBE 30.00
5120 FEB 2022 001.011.000.511 GREATER SPOKANE VALLEY CHAMBE 30.00
5120 FEB 2022 001.011.000.511 INNOVIA FOUNDATION: 2022 COMMUN 50.00
5120 FEB 2022 001.011.000.511 GREATER SPOKANE INC -ANNUAL CE 55.00
5120 FEB 2022 001.011.000.511 WING MORALE ASSN.: 80TH ANNIVERI 20.00
5120 FEB 2022 001.011.000.511 GREATER SPOKANE INC: REFUND AID -55.00
Total : 235.00
4 Vouchers for bank code : apbank Bank total : 7,512.67
4 Vouchers in this report
Total vouchers : 7,512.67
Page:
vchlist Voucher List Page: 1
03124/2022 3:37:58PM Spokane Valley
Bank code: apbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept DescriptionlAccount Amount
56425 3/24/2022 008570 OLSON, WENDELL PARCEL 55173.1005 303.000.205.595 CIP 0205: ROW ACQUISITION 18,278.00
Total : 18,278.00
1 Vouchers for bank code : apbank Bank total : 18,278.00
1 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers : 18,278.00
i, the undersigned, do certify under penalty of perjury,
that the materials have been furnished, the services
rendered, or the labor performed as described herein
and that the claim is just, due and an unpaid
obligation against the City of Spokane Valley, and that
I am authorized to authenticate and certify said claim.
Finance Director Date
Council member reviewed;
Mayor Date
Council Member Date
Page:
IR
vchlist Voucher List Page: 1
03/31/2022 10:25:26AM Spokane Valley
Bank code : apbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount
56426 3/31/2022 006382 AHBL INC 130723 309.000.316.594 0316- BALFOUR PARK IMPROVEMENT. 11,400.23
Total: 11,400.23
56427 3/31/2022 008533 ALL TRAFFIC SOLUTIONS INC SIN031925 001.016.099.594 SVPD SA24 TRAILERS 34,678.20
Total : 34,678.20
56428 3/31/2022 003337 ARROW CONSTRUCTION SUPPLY INC 328297 101.042.000.542 EX STREET COLD MIX 1,256.27
328431 101.042.000.542 CRAFCO MASTIC PLEXIMELT 1,715.18
328542 101.042.000.542 CRAFCO MASTIC PLEXIMELT 1,715.18
Total : 4,686.63
56429 3/31/2022 004231 BELSBY ENGINEERING 67368 001.040.041.558 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,030.00
Total : 2,030.00
56430 3/31/2022 000322 CENTURYLINK 835B 3-14-2022 001.076.000.576 2022 PHONE SVCS: ACCT 509-Z14-002. 544.89
Total: 544.89
56431 3/31/2022 001888 COMCAST 4668 3/17-4/16/22 001.076.305.575 INTERNET & PHONE: CENTERPLACE 381.46
Total: 381.46
56432 3/31/2022 000734 DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION RE 46 JG6453 L014 314.000.223.595 0223 PINES RD AGREEMENT JG-6453 2,741.16
RE 46 JG6453 L015 314.000.223.595 0223 PINES RD AGREEMENT JG-6453 2,489.23
Total : 5,230.39
56433 3/31/2022 000246 EAST SPOKANE WATER DIST #1 MARCH 2022 402.402.000.531 WATER CHARGES 246.59
Total : 246.59
56434 3/31/2022 000252 LOWE'S BUSINESS ACCOUNT MARCH 2022 501.000.000.548 SUPPLIES: MAINTENANCE 311.24
Total : 311.24
56435 3/31/2022 007157 MASTERGRAPHICS AEC, LLC 011114 001.040.041.543 BLUEBEAM LICENSE 2,771.51
Total : 2,771.51
56436 3/31/2022 000132 MODERN ELECTRIC WATER CO 20472519 001.033.034.518 UTILITIES: MARCH 2022 WHITE ELEPH 217.07
20472672 101.042.000.542 UTILITIES: MARCH 2022 CPW 12,791.35
20472673 001.076.302.576 UTILITIES: MARCH 2022 PARKS 1,663.65
vchlist
03131 /2022 10:25:26AIMI
Voucher List
Spokane Valley
Page: 2
Bank code :
Voucher
apbank
Date Vendor
Invoice Fund/Dept
56436 3/31/2022 000132 000132 MODERN ELECTRIC WATER CO
56437 3/31/2022 003090 NORTH 40 OUTFITTERS
56438 3/31/2022 008542 OAC SERVICES INC
56439 3/31/2022 004621 OREILLYAUTOMOTIVE STORES INC
56440 3/31/2022 008265 OSBORN CONSULTING INC
56441 3/31/2022 007730 ROYAL BUSINESS SYSTEMS
56442 3/31/2022 000459 SPOKANE CO TITLE CO
56443 3/31/2022 003210 WEST CONSULTANTS INC.
56444 3/31/2022 005400 WESTERN PACIFIC SIGNAL LLC
56445 3/31/2022 002363 WESTERN STATES EQUIPMENT CO
56446 3/31/2022 007867 WIDENER &ASSOCIATES
56447 3/31/2022 005352 ZHUKOV, OKSANA
16046623 3/30/2022 000001 SPOKANE CO TREASURER
(Continued)
105278/3
142802
2862-164810
6959
IN165978
SP26548.RF
SP26551.RF
016572
28443
1N001956451
528
EXPENSES
9290202114
101.043, 000.542
316.000.336.575
001.040.043.558
403.000.327.595
001.040.043.558
303.000.205.595
303.000.205.595
402.000.000.531
101.042.000.594
101.000.000.542
314.000.223.595
001.018.014.514
001.016.000.521
Description/Account Amount
Total :
SMALL TOOLS/MINOR EQUIPMENT
Total :
0336 PROJECT MGMT & OWNER'S REF
Total :
VEHICLE REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES::
Total :
SPRAGUE AVE STORMWATER IMPR01
Total :
Total:
Total :
Total :
Total :
MARCH 2022 COPIER COSTS
CIP 0205: RECORDING FEES
CIP 0205: RECORDING FEES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
ETHERWAN SWITCHES
VEHICLE MAINT. SUPPLIES: SNOW FLI
Total :
0223-ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
Total :
Total :
Total:
EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT
LE CONTRACT MARCH 2022
14,672.07
100.17
100.17
2,649.60
2,649.60
98.84
98.84
3,422.25
3,422.25
358.72
358.72
433.00
649.50
1,082.50
26,127.25
26,127.25
11,396.00
11,396.00
202.87
202.87
7,961.78
7,961.78
230.00
230.00
1,863,483.00
1,863,483.00
vchlist
03131 12022 10:25:26AM
Voucher List Page: 3
Spokane Valley
Bank code : apbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice FundlDept Description/Account Amount
23 Vouchers for bank code : apbank Bank total : 1,994,066,19
23 Vouchers in this report
I, the undersigned, do certify under penalty of perjury,
that the materials have been furnished, the services
rendered, or the labor performed as described herein
and that the claim is just, due and an unpaid
obligation against the City of Spokane Valley, and that
I am authorized to authenticate and certify said claim.
Finance Director Date
Council member reviewed:
Mayor Dale
Council Member Date
Total vouchers : 1,994,066.19
Page:
vchlist Voucher List Page: 1
03/22/2022 1:28:52PM Spokane Valley
Bank code : pk-ref
Voucher Date Vendor invoice FundlDept Description/Account Amount
9265 3/22/2022 006581 COMUNIDAD CRISTIANA DE SPOKANE PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: ROOM 109
9266 3/22/2022 001627 STCU PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: ROOM 205
9267 3/22/2022 008516 SUMMIT SCHOOL CVSD PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: ROOM 213
Total :
Total :
Total:
3 Vouchers for bank code : pk-ref Bank total :
3 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers :
the undersigned, do certify under penalty of perjury,
that the materials have been furnished, the services
rendered, or the labor performed as described herein
and that the claim is just, due and an unpaid
obligation against the City of Spokane Valley, and that
I am authorized to authenticate and certify said claim.
Finance Director Date
Council member reviewed:
Mayor Date
Council Member Date
52.00
52.00
52.00
52.00
52.00
52.00
156.00
156.00
Page:
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: April 12, 2022 Department Director Approval:
Item: Check all that apply: ® consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Payroll for Pay Period Ending March 31, 2022
GOVERNING LEGISLATION:
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN:
BACKGROUND:
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS:
Employees Council Total
Gross: $ 396,893.62 $ 10,265.00 $ 407,158.62
Benefits: $ 218,585.35 $ 8,705.20 $ 227,290.55
Total payroll $ 615,478.97 $ 18,970.20 $ 634,449.17
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to Approve above payroll. [Approved as part of
the Consent Agenda, or may be removed and discussed separately.]
STAFF CONTACT: Raba Nimri
DRAFT
MINUTES
City of Spokane Valley
City Council Study Session Meeting
Tuesday, March 15, 2022
Deputy Mayor Higgins called the meeting to order at 6 p.m. The meeting was held in person in Council
Chambers, and also remotely via Zoom meeting.
Attendance:
Councilmembers
Rod Higgins, Deputy Mayor
Tim Hattenburg, Councilmember
Laura Padden, Councilmember
Brandi Peetz, Councilmember
Ben Wick, Councilmember
Arne Woodard, Councilmember
Absent:
Pam Haley, Mayor
Staff
John Hohman, City Manager
Erik Lamb, Deputy City Manager
Cary Driskell, City Attorney
Chelsie Taylor, Finance Director
John Bottelli, Parks, Rec & Facilities Dir.
Dave Ellis, Police Chief
Bill Helbig, City Engineer
Adam Jackson, Planning/Grants Engineer
Jerremy Clark, Traffic Engineering Manager
Mike Basinger, Economic Development Dir.
Jenny Nickerson, Building Official
Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk
ROLL CALL: City Clerk Bainbridge called roll; all Councilmembers were present except Mayor Haley.
It was moved by Councilmember Woodard, seconded and unanimously agreed to excuse Mayor Haley.
APPROVAL OF AGENDA It was moved by Councilmember Woodard, seconded and unanimously
agreed to approve the agenda.
ACTION ITEMS:
1. Motion Consideration: Potential Grant Opportunity: Spokane Regional Transportation Council —Adam
Jackson
It was moved by Councilmember Woodard and seconded to authorize the City Manager or designee to
apply to the SRTC grant for those projects identified in ranked order as shown in Table 2. After Mr. Jackson
gave a brief recap of the grant and talked a little about the expanded chart showing the grant requests and
matching funds, Deputy Mayor Higgins invited public comment. No public comments were offered. Vote
by acclamation: in favor: unanimous. Opposed: None. Motion carried.
2. Motion Consideration: RAISE Grant - Adam Jackson
It was moved by Councilmember Woodard and seconded to authorize the City Manager or designee to
apply for the RAISE Fiscal Year 2022 grant for the Pines Road/BNSF Grade Separation Project. After Mr.
Jackson gave a brief recap of the grant and talked a little about funds and REET projections, Deputy Mayor
Higgins invited public comment. No public comments were offered. Vote by acclamation: in favor:
unanimous. Opposed: None. Motion carried. Mr. Hohman noted that the Avista land donation agenda item
will be coming up in a few weeks.
3. Motion Consideration: Evergreen Preservation Project Bid Award — Gloria Mantz
It was moved by Councilmember Woodard and seconded to award the Evergreen Road Preservation
Project CIP #333 to Inland Infrastructure, LLC in the amount of $1,029,906.00 and authorize the City
Manager to finalize and execute construction contract documents. City Engineer Mantz went over the
background of this project, and its current estimated costs and budget; said that four bids were submitted,
and the lowest, responsible bidder was Inland Infrastructure, with a bid approximately 6.8% over the
engineer's estimate. Deputy Mayor Higgins invited public comment. No public comments were offered.
Vote by acclamation: in favor: unanimous. Opposed: None. Motion carried.
Council Meeting Minutes, Study Session: 03-15-2022 Page 1 of 3
Approved by Council:
DRAFT
NON -ACTION ITEMS:
4. 2022 Construction Project Updates — Gloria Mantz
City Engineer Mantz gave an overview of the projects scheduled for construction this year including the
Buckeye Sewer Extension, Barker Road Corridor projects, intersection improvement projects, Balfour Park
improvements, pedestrian improvement projects, Sullivan Park Waterline project, Evergreen Road
Preservation Broadway to Mission, Sprague Avenue Preservation project Havana to Fancher, Local Access
streets in Summerfield east, Mission Avenue over Evergreen Road bridge deck seal, and the citywide
reflective post panels.
5. Transportation Impact Fee Rate Studies Update — Jerremy Clark
Via his PowerPoint presentation, Mr. Clark discussed the transportation impact fee rate study updates,
including the history of the impact fee, trip generation changes, impact fee rate comparison for different
land use groups, such as residential, services, industrial, etc. and showed the different areas on his map.
There was Council consensus to move this forward for an ordinance consideration.
6. School Zone Flashing Beacons — Jerremy Clark, Bill Helbig
Traffic Engineering Manager Clark went over the background of school zone flashing beacons; he noted
that nine locations have been identified without beacons, excluding high schools and virtual learning
centers, and that we have budgeted for 18 new beacons. Mr. Clark noted preliminary engineering is
underway in five locations including Greenacres Elementary, Sunrise Elementary, Centennial Middle
School, Early Learning Center; and that the Greenacres Middle School zone needs to be adopted by
resolution. Mr. Clark noted Trent Elementary is strictly bussing and drop-off school with no walking
without parent authorization; for Ness Elementary, Broadway is the walk boundary line and no walking is
expected, and Pratt Elementary has been converted to a choice -in high school in the Spokane School
District. After discussion about the different schools, there was Council consensus to move forward to a
resolution to modify the City's Master Speed Limit Schedule to establish the two new school zones, and to
reduce the number of installations budgeted since not all schools would receive a flashing beacon.
7. Potential Grant Opportunity: Recreation & Conservation Office (RCO) — Erik Lamb, John Bottelli
Director Bottelli went over the information contained in his Request for Council Action concerning the
two-year grant cycle with the Washington State Recreation and Conservation Office (RCO). Mr. Bottelli
said that staff seeks Council consensus on whether to move forward submitting applications for grant
funding through the RCO's Land and Water Conservation fund, and the Washington Wildlife and
Recreation Program; which includes projects such sport courts, picnic shelters, play areas, spray parks, and
open areas as eligible projects; which he said could be used for Balfour Park Phase 2 construction. There
was general Council consensus to move forward as suggested.
8. Parking Prohibitions — Cary Driskell, Chief Ellis, Jerremy Clark
Mr. Lamb stated that tonight's discussion will be only about parking in the streets on the public right-of-
way, and in a few weeks, staff will bring Council a discussion concerning parking on private property; he
said proposed regulations would be city-wide and not just for an identified no -parking zone. Mr. Lamb
also stated that no decisions need to be made tonight, but staff will be presenting some aspects of parking
for Council's further consideration. After Mr. Driskell went through the proposed ordinance explaining the
function of each section, there was discussion about section 9.40.050 about how many days should occur
before a parking on public right-of-way violation would result in impoundment. Mr. Driskell said the state
law has 24 hours as its default, which could be problematic if someone were on vacation or otherwise
briefly away from home. Mr. Lamb added that there is flexibility for law enforcement to try to contact the
owner and/or allow additional time before a vehicle is impounded. It was noted this regulation would be
for a residence, whether a home or an apartment. Mr. Lamb added that if Council were to impose a no -
parking zone nearby apartments, it would be for everyone. Mr. Driskell further stated that enforcement is
always an issue and it will take manpower for whatever Council adopts. Concerning the amount of time
prior to impoundment, Chief Ellis stated the shorter the time period the better; said most complaints he
receives are about people sleeping in cars in front of residences. Mr. Lamb stated that trying to identify if
Council Meeting Minutes, Study Session: 03-15-2022 Page 2 of 3
Approved by Council:
DRAFT
a vehicle is associated with a residence would also be difficult to determine and difficult to enforce. Mr.
Driskell agreed the more workable number is a lower number as the Police Department can still exercise
discretion to some extent.
Chief Ellis said that these issues are usually complaint driven and people living in the neighborhood
generally knows who is and is not supposed to be there. It was also mentioned that we do not get complaints
about over -towing. Chief Ellis explained that SCOPE generally goes out twice a week, with the first time
placing a notice on the vehicle, and the second time scheduling it for impounding; so there are normally a
few days between the notice and the impound. Chief Ellis also said that there is no interest in towing a car
that belongs to a house; and again that these issues are completely complaint driven. Based on the
conversation, Mr. Driskell asked if Council would like to remove that provision in 9.40.050(A) and rely on
state law, and all members of Council nodded in agreement.
Mr. Driskell asked Council's preference for the amount of the fine, and said a fine of this type is usually
$30 as a basic parking violation, and if the vehicle gets impounded, the owner would get that fine too; and
a non-moving offense would go to District Court. Council agreed to keep with the $30.00 fine. Chief Ellis
went over the parking enforcement slides and SCOPE's responsibility; and said they towed 221 vehicles
last year in Spokane Valley.
Deputy City Manager Lamb asked for consensus to bring the draft ordinance forward for a first reading and
they all agreed. Staff mentioned that they will look at potential options to enhance what SCOPE is already
doing including having additional resources; if SCOPE members are willing to handle additional tasks and
if so, that means more cost; but staff will gather information and come back to Council for additional
discussion. Councilmembers nodded in approvement.
9. Advance Agenda — Mayor Haley
Councilmember Woodard suggested cancelling the April 5 Council meeting as he and two other
Councilmembers will be out of town. A majority of Councilmembers agreed.
10. Information Only
The (a) Independent Salary Commission Final Report, and the (b) Finance Monthly report were for
information only and were not reported or discussed.
11. Council Comments — Deputy Mayor Higgins
There were no further Council comments.
12. City Manager Comments — John Hohman
Mr. Hohman expressed thanks to Senator Murray for including the South Barker Corridor in the 2022
Congressionally Directed Spending, which was part of the omnibus spending bill that was approved by the
House and Senate last week, so it looks like we may be receiving $3 million for that corridor, which staff
will be bringing forward at a future Council meeting; said we received a request for 2023 projects from
Senator Murray's office and that too will be brought up at a future Council meeting; and said that any
Councilmembers interested in signing up for the Farmers Market, to please speak with Marci Patterson; he
said the Farmers Market will be held June through September every Friday from 4 to 8 p.m.
It was moved by Councilmember Woodard, seconded and unanimously agreed to adjourn. The meeting
adjourned at 8:01 p.m.
ATTEST:
Pam Haley, Mayor
Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk
Council Meeting Minutes, Study Session: 03-15-2022 Page 3 of 3
Approved by Council:
DRAFT
MINUTES
City of Spokane Valley
City Council Regular Formal Meeting
Tuesday, March 22, 2022
Mayor Haley called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. The meeting was held virtually via Zoom, and also
in City Hall Council Chambers with Council and staff attending in person.
Attendance:
Councilmembers
Pam Haley, Mayor
Rod Higgins, Deputy Mayor
Tim Hattenburg, Councilmember
Laura Padden, Councilmember
Brandi Peetz, Councilmember
Ben Wick, Councilmember
Arne Woodard, Councilmember
Staff
John Hohman, City Manager
Erik Lamb, Deputy City Manager
Bill Helbig, Community & Public Works Dir.
Chelsie Taylor, Finance Director
Cary Driskell, City Attorney
John Bottelli, Parks, Rec & Facilities Director
Gloria Mantz, City Engineer
Eric Robison, Housing & Homeless Coordinator
Jerremy Clark, Engineering Manager
Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk
INVOCATION: Pastor Kevin Lind of Opportunity Presbyterian Church gave the invocation.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Council, staff and the audience stood for the Pledge of Allegiance.
ROLL CALL Prior to roll all, City Clerk Bainbridge announced that we were notified there are some
technical issues with the broadcast, and that tonight's Council meeting will not be broadcast on Channel
14, but it will still be streaming live via Zoom, and it will be recorded and available on the City's website.
Clerk Bainbridge then called the roll; all Councilmembers were present
APPROVAL OF AMENDED AGENDA It was moved by Deputy Mayor Higgins, seconded and
unanimously agreed to approve the amended agenda.
INTRODUCTION OF SPECIAL GUESTS AND PRESENTATIONS: n/a
COMMITTEE, BOARD, LIAISON SUMMARY REPORTS
Councilmember Wick: extended congratulations on Fairchild Air Force Base's 80th anniversary; said he
attended a FMSIB (Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board) meeting in Vancouver, Washington where
he participated in a tour of the I-5 corridor bridge; went to the Visit Spokane board meeting and said they
received an ARPA (American Rescue Plan Act) request from Spokane City for $3 million to try to fund
some rental incentives for events/convention space; said they are also sponsoring the 'best of' parties
through the Inlander for best places to go, eat, dine; said the state passed the state legislature and established
a new license plate, a Washington wine license plate for wine coinsurers and said extra money from those
plates will go toward the Washington State Tourism office; and they passed a motion picture initiative to
encourage more movie development in our state.
Councilmember Woodard: no report.
Councilmember Hattenburg: said STA (Spokane Transit Authority) services were scheduled to increase in
May but will be delayed until August due to a lack of drivers; said Valley Route 95 will be extended to
Amazon this spring, and mentioned sales are 36% above budget and they will roll over $20 million for
future projects; said he attended a groundbreaking for the Fire Department's new maintenance training
facility, which will replace the old maintenance facility that is 30 years old.
Council Meeting Minutes, Formal: 03-22-2022 Page 1 of 5
Approved by Council:
DRAFT
Councilmember Peetz: said she attended a 911 State committee meeting where they discussed texting to
911, that many cities don't have that capability yet but there are about 30 counties that do; said recently
passed legislation includes telecommunicators being reclassified to first responders; said she went to a
ribbon cutting for Swing Lounge, which is a virtual golf business, they give lessons, and have a pro -shop;
she met with the Mental Health Task Force with Representative McMorris Rodgers and Mayor Woodward
and said Teen Text, 844-814-8336 is for teens to call or text for substance use and mental health support;
and she mentioned Representative McMorris Rodgers said that the Energy and Commerce Committee will
be holding hearings April 5 regarding the reauthorization of SAMHSA (Substance Abuse and Mental
Health Services Administration) and HRSA (Health Resources and Services Administration) they distribute
health block grants; and that they approved $3 million in ARPA funding for youth behavior health in the
City of Spokane, adding that a lot of our resources are there as well; and that she attended the Girl Scouts
fundraiser, which included Women of Distinction awards.
Councilmember Padden: stated that she attended the bylaws committee for the Spokane Regional Law and
Justice committee, said it appears they will meet their April deadline to present recommendations to the
full committee.
Deputy Mayor Higgins: said he attended the Spokane Regional Transportation Council meeting where they
discussed target zero, which is Washington State Department of Transportation's (WSDOT) plan to reduce
traffic deaths and serious injuries to zero by the year 2030; said there was an unsubstantiated report that the
North/South freeway completion date has been set forward by 18 months; said there was also discussion of
leasing WSDOT properties along the freeway right-of-way for residential and businesses, but he stated that
WSDOT wasn't in favor of the proposed bill; was also a discussion on regional freight projects for possible
2022/25, and the top six projects, three of which are in Spokane Valley, in priority order are: Bigelow Gulch
Forker Road Connector Phase 2, Pines Road BNSF Grade Separation Project, and Wellesley Avenue/Freya
Street to Havana Improvements, Bigelow Sullivan Trent Avenue Sullivan Interchange, Argonne Road I-90
interchange bridge widening, and the Argonne Road and Upriver Drive Intersection Improvements.
MAYOR'S REPORT
Mayor Haley reported that she also attended the Swing Lounge opening, and the 80th Anniversary at
Fairchild, which she said has an interesting history, and said hopefully they will get the museum back open
one day; said she went to the groundbreaking of the Healing Lodge of the Seven Nations, which is an
alcohol and drug rehabilitation place for teens; said the Seven Nations came together and with the help of
the Washington Department of Commerce, will construct a new center which she said will take about 18
months, and she mentioned some of the aspects of the center; said she also attended the STA Board meeting
and said they ae offering sign -on bonuses for their coach operators, they offer training, and it's a great
career.
GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT OPPORTUNITY 11l: Mayor Haley explained the process, and then
invited public comment.
Ms. Jenifer Evans, Spokane Valley, via zoom: said she lives in the Chester neighborhood; she spoke about
the City's noise ordinance and her neighbor's blasting music and loud truck; said she spoke to him and his
landlord, to the Police Department, and to code enforcement, but all to no avail; said according to our code,
a violation of the noise ordinance is a misdemeanor; said she has been calling for over a year and the
behavior of her neighbor has become more aggressive; said she called Crime Check and a deputy showed
up hours later; she asked why there is no enforcement of our code.
Ms. Pam Marlow, Spokane Valley, via zoom: said she and some of he neighbors are concerned with the
drug dealing going on at all hours in conjunction with Eagle Point Apartments; said people park and wait
and swoop in; and she asked about possibly getting more law enforcement coverage and start cracking
down on these people; she also mentioned that the Eagle Point Apartments got a tax break and they are
paying less than she is, yet they take all the resources since the owner has taken control of the complex.
Mr. Dan Allison, Spokane Valley: said when a person brings something to Council the people need to know
who that is, and not just say staff; also that the City should curb park spending as we have plenty of property
and don't need to start developing it and spending more than what we spent on the property.
Council Meeting Minutes, Formal: 03-22-2022 Page 2 of 5
Approved by Council:
DRAFT
NEW BUSINESS:
1. Consent Agenda: Consists of items considered routine which are approved as a group. Any member of
Council may ask that an item be removed from the Consent Agenda to be considered separately.
Proposed Motion: I move to approve the Consent Agenda.
a. Approval of Claim Vouchers on March 22, 2022, Request for Council Action Form: $2,965,640.83
b. Approval of Payroll for Pay Period Ending March 15, 2022: $450,421.34
c. Approval of Council Meeting Minutes of March 1, 2022 Study Session
d. Approval of Council Meeting Minutes of March 8, 2022 Regular Formal Meeting
It was moved by Deputy Mayor Higgins, seconded and unanimously agreed to approve the Consent Agenda.
2. First Reading Proposed Ordinance 22-005 Approving Updated Transportation Impact Fee Rate Studies
— Jerremy Clark
After City Clerk Bainbridge read the ordinance title, it was moved by Deputy Mayor Higgins and seconded
to advance Ordinance No. 22-005, adopting the Transportation Impact Fee Rate Study Updates and
underlying Rate Study Addenda, to a second reading as proposed. After a brief explanation from Mr. Clark,
Mayor Haley invited public comments. No comments were offered. Vote by acclamation: in favor:
unanimous. Opposed: none. Motion carried.
2a. Motion to Amend Previously Approved Bid Award — Gloria Mantz
It was moved by Deputy Mayor Higgins and seconded to amend the March 15, 2022 Evergreen Road
Preservation Project CIP #333 bid, awarded to Inland Infrastructure, LLC, to the corrected amount of
$1,099,941.00 and authorize the City Manager to finalize and execute construction contract documents.
City Engineer Mantz explained that this project was awarded last week but the bid award amount
inadvertently included was actually the engineer's estimate, instead of the bid of Inland Infrastructure.
Mayor Haley invited public comment; no comments were offered. Vote by acclamation: in favor:
unanimous. Opposed: none. Motion carried.
GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT OPPORTUNITY 121: Mayor Haley invited public comment.
Ms. Barb Howard, Spokane Valley, via zoom: said she has been having a terrible time with Crime Check
and was told to call the precinct; said she heard gunshots and it took six days to get a report done; said she
called about vehicles on March 6 and those vehicles are still there; and asked what can be done to solve
these neighborhood problems; and perhaps crime check either needs help or needs to be replaced.
Mr. John Harding, Spokane Valley: asked Council to consider giving public comment opportunity for each
meeting; said he doesn't understand why it is every other week; said action is taken and it's not until days
later when the public is involved and doesn't have an opportunity to reply; said citizens should have the
opportunity to give public input.
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS:
3. Sullivan/Trent Project Update — Gloria Mantz, Jerremy Clark
Via PowerPoint, City Engineer Mantz began the update on this project by showing the project location,
description, and existing conditions including mention that this bridge has been hit several times, six times
in the last ten years and needs repairs. Mr. Cark then explained about the existing traffic conditions, and
went over the alternatives and the evaluation of each; followed by Ms. Mantz explaining that this project
has been identified as an eligible project application for a potential grant with the Federal Highway Bridge
Program; and that upon completion of the alternatives analysis, a more accurate project estimate can be
provided, and that the current estimated total project cost is $26.6 million. There was discussion about the
project estimated cost as likely being low based on today's economy; if awarded the City would need to
secure the $12 million funding difference and that there is obviously a need; to perhaps break the project
into two projects; whether this grant would fit any other grade separation project; and of the uncertainty
this project would even come close to being funded. It was Council consensus that staff not move forward
with this grant opportunity.
Council Meeting Minutes, Formal: 03-22-2022 Page 3 of 5
Approved by Council:
DRAFT
4. Homeless Housing & Assistance Act (HHAA) Funds — Erik Lamb, Eric Robison
Deputy City Manager Lamb said tonight is the fist administrative report on this topic, and that staff will be
conducting further research and Council can anticipate future reports. As shown on the PowerPoint slides,
Mr. Lamb mentioned the fees authorized by the HHAA on certain documents recorded at the County
Auditor's office and that the Board of County Commissioners expends the funds based on recommendations
from the Spokane County Housing and Community Development Advisory Committee (HCDAC); and that
we have an interlocal with Spokane County for them to manage the HHAA fees. Mr. Lamb also went over
some of the other associated County funds such as the HOME funding, and CDBG (Community
Development Block Grant).
Mr. Robison then explained about the multiple options including entering into an agreement to continue
with Spokane County handling this and allowing us input; or we could also assume direct control over the
HHAA funds which includes its own set of requirements, as do the other options, including complying with
performance measures outlined in the Depaitinent of Commerce Local Plan Guidelines. Mr. Lamb said he
spoke with someone from the Depaitinent of Commerce yesterday about the reporting requirements
clarifications, and was told that when an entity is funded, they must provide a report which includes every
dollar that goes to that project; he said staff also spoke with staff from Spokane County and they have no
desire to have an arrangement like we have with them for CDBG, and they do not want a joint agreement.
Again, Mr. Lamb said staff is not looking for direction tonight and will be bringing further information in
the future. Mr. Lamb also mentioned that there is nothing in the law that specifies that an award must go to
a facility or project in Spokane Valley, but it has to be consistent with whatever plan we adopt. Mr. Lamb
mentioned that staff is working on setting up something in the City for a real-time count to mirror what is
in the point -in -time count. Mr. Robinson said there are about 70 to 100 people in our city limits at any given
time who are unsheltered, and that number does not include students moving from one friend's couch to
another.
Councilmember Peetz said she feels we didn't have much say in the five-year plan and it sounds as though
we were not included; said she understands about not wanting to duplicate resources, but we spent millions
of dollars on the purchase of these homeless buildings without a lot of due diligence, so now we're spending
millions more to make them habitable; therefore, she said, we are either duplicating resources to be able to
spend the money where we think is best for our city or we are duplicating resources because we bought a
building that wasn't up to par and now we are spending money to get it up to par; she added that the City
of Spokane is trying to move their resources out of the downtown area which also requires spending money;
she that we put in $600,000 but only got $100,000 back and that we should be doing a better job of making
sure that comes back; that she would like us to be more involved; and perhaps have something in a contract
to allow us more input on how the funds are spent. Councilmember Wick said it was his understanding we
were looking at what a homeless plan would be for Spokane Valley and he would like to see what our plan
might include according to our needs. Mr. Hohman said there was discussion this morning on that topic and
it is our intention to take the point -in -time count to give us a range of people to provide some services for,
and then build a program; said there is a draft of this housing action plan to give us some idea of how this
would work which will be brought back to Council for future discussion.
Councilmember Woodard said he would like us to ask the Department of Commerce regarding outreach
services, why we can't include law enforcement in our grant applications; that during the HCDAC meetings,
said he was told that they don't qualify under the rules, and said he wants to know where is that stated under
the rules as we should have had that officer; said some of the homeless people have mental illnesses; and
maybe the law needs to be changed to include law enforcement; said we believe there should be more
accountability with those tax dollars. Mr. Lamb said he will research whether these funds can be used for
mental health.
Council Meeting Minutes, Formal: 03-22-2022 Page 4 of 5
Approved by Council:
DRAFT
5. Advance Agenda — Mayor Haley
Councilmember Peetz asked if the Blake decision affects our code, and City Attorney Driskell said he will
have to look at that as it could have an impact on our chronic nuisance provisions.
6. Depaitnient Reports
Department Reports were for information only and were not reported or discussed
CITY MANAGER COMMENTS
City Manager Hohman said he distributed copies of a draft letter to Senator Murray thanking her the
inclusion of the Barker Road Corridor into Congressional spending, and said we look forward to getting
information on how to access those funds; he asked if Council has no objections, he will ask Mayor Haley
to sign the letter; and there were no objections. Mr. Hohman said he attended an ARPA sub -committee
meeting today and they came up with a sample allocation, which he will bring to full Council soon with the
number of projects; said they are still researching potential ways to use those funds. Mr. Hohman also noted
the e-mail he previously sent Council regarding the bid for the Balfour Park project, and that since those
bids came in extremely high, staff will analyze those figures and bring Council an updated report in April,
adding that they will not be moving forward on those bids now. Further, Mr. Hohman said that Cardinal
Infrastructure, our Federal Lobbyist group, told us that the INFRA notice of funding opportunities will be
coming out tomorrow and that we have historically applied for the Bigelow Gulch/Sullivan interchange
project; said there is a tremendous amount of money in INFRA and a subsection called MEGA; said this
gives us concern about having so much money out there that that it causes prices to increase and competition
for materials; said one of the things in the Balfour bids was that none of the local concrete suppliers bid on
this, and the landscape company with the low bid came from Oregon; said he feels our local contractors are
very busy and therefore didn't submit a bid; and said staff will be monitoring this for the remainder of the
construction season.
EXECUTIVE SESSION: PENDING/POTENTIAL LITIGATION [RCW 42.30.110(1(i))]
It was moved by Deputy Mayor Higgins, seconded and unanimously agreed to adjourn into executive
session for one hour to discuss litigation, and that no action will be taken upon return to open session.
Council adjourned into executive session at 7:44 p.m. At 8:25 p.m. Mayor Haley declared Council out of
executive session at which time it was moved by Councilmember Woodard, seconded and unanimously
agreed to adjourn.
ATTEST: Pam Haley, Mayor
Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk
Council Meeting Minutes, Formal: 03-22-2022 Page 5 of 5
Approved by Council:
DRAFT
MINUTES
City of Spokane Valley
City Council Study Session Meeting
Tuesday, March 29, 2022
Mayor Haley called the meeting to order at 6 p.m. The meeting was held in person in Council Chambers,
and also remotely via Zoom meeting.
Attendance:
Councilmembers
Pam Haley, Mayor
Rod Higgins, Deputy Mayor
Tim Hattenburg, Councilmember
Laura Padden, Councilmember
Brandi Peetz, Councilmember
Ben Wick, Councilmember
Arne Woodard, Councilmember
Staff
John Hohman, City Manager
Erik Lamb, Deputy City Manager
Chelsie Taylor, Finance Director
Cary Driskell, City Attorney
Bill Helbig, Community & Public Works Dir.
John Bottelli, Parks, Rec & Facilities Dir.
Dave Ellis, Police Chief
Gloria Mantz, City Engineer
Jerremy Clark, Traffic Engineering Manager
Morgan Koudelka, Sr Administrative Analyst
Mike Basinger, Economic Development Dir.
Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk
ROLL CALL: City Clerk Bainbridge called roll; all Councilmembers were present. City Clerk Bainbridge
announced that we were notified there are some technical issues with the broadcast, and that tonight's
Council meeting will not be broadcast on Channel 14, but it will still be streaming live via Zoom, and it
will be recorded and available on the City's website.
APPROVAL OF AMENDED AGENDA It was moved by Deputy Mayor Higgins, seconded and
unanimously agreed to approve the amended agenda.
PROCLAMATION: Vietnam War Veterans Day
Mayor Haley read the Vietnam War Veterans Day proclamation, after which City Clerk Bainbridge said
she will make sure the appropriate person receives the proclamation.
ACTION ITEMS:
1. Second Reading Ordinance 22-005 Approving Updated Transportation Impact Fee Rate Studies—Jerremy
Clark
After City Clerk Bainbridge read the ordinance title, it was moved by Deputy Mayor Higgins and seconded
to approve Ordinance 22-005 adopting the Transportation Impact Fee Rate Study Updates and underlying
Rate Study Addenda, as proposed. After a brief explanation by Mr. Clark of the purpose of the ordinance,
Mayor Haley invited public comment. No comments were offered. Vote by acclamation: in favor:
unanimous. Opposed: none. Motion carried.
2. Resolution 22-003 Amending Master Fee Schedule, Transportation Impact Fees — Chelsie Taylor
It was moved by Deputy Mayor Higgins and seconded to approve Resolution 22-003 repealing and
replacing Resolution 21-009 and approving a new Master Fee Schedule for 2022. After a brief explanation
by Director Taylor that the purpose of the resolution is to update the transportation impact fee schedules,
Mayor Haley invited public comment. No comments were offered. Councilmember Woodard said he would
like a future discussion about the fees for CenterPlace, and Mr. Hohman said that report is scheduled for
the April 19 meeting. Vote by acclamation: in favor: unanimous. Opposed: none. Motion carried.
Council Meeting Minutes, Study Session: 03-29-2022 Page 1 of 3
Approved by Council:
DRAFT
3. Motion Consideration: Interlocal Agreement, Spokane County Parklets — Cary Driskell
It was moved by Deputy Mayor Higgins and seconded to approve Amendment No 1 to the Interlocal
Agreement between Spokane County and City of Spokane Valley regarding Multi -Use Trail along a portion
of former Milwaukee Rail right-of-way, and authorize staff to finalize and execute the same. City Attorney
Driskell went over the background of the Interlocal Agreement, and explained that the amendment includes
clarifying some of the definitions, changes responsibility from the County to the City for considering
granting of license agreements for third -party users such as adjoining property owners; and makes clear
that the City is responsible for payment of all assessments on the property such as stormwater charges. Mr.
Driskell noted that the City's stormwater fees will be approximately $2,100 annually, which is based on the
amount of impervious surface. He added that historically, the County has paid the stormwater assessments
of about $416 annually; they indicated they don't want the City to pay them back for any of those fees, nor
are they are not interested in sharing the annual license fee. Mayor Haley invited public comment; no
comments were offered.
There was Council discussion about the amendment, with Councilmember Padden voicing her opposition
to the amendment, stating that it appears lopsided in favor of the County, that the County maintains
authority over the right-of-way as it is their property, and that we are putting millions of dollars into an area
that we do not own. City Manager Hohman stated that he met with the County CEO last week and that this
issue will be discussed further, and he will keep Council apprised as things move forward. There was also
discussion about the businesses wanting to take advantage of their proximity to the trail by adding such
things as expansion to their patio, or having a pathway or something similar, and not adding a building. Mr.
Hohman added that even if we owned the right-of-way, we would not want businesses building on it; again
stated that this is a topic under discussion with the County, said there is a big history on this subject, that
the City sued the County in the early years and it was a bit contentious; again stating that the topic is on the
table. Mayor Haley added that perhaps a better time to address this with the County is after the addition to
two new commissioners. Vote by acclamation: in favor: Mayor Haley, Deputy Mayor Higgins, and
Councilmembers Peetz, Wick, Hattenburg, and Woodard. Opposed: Councilmember Padden. Motion
carried.
3a. Motion Consideration: Barker Road/BNSF Grade Separation Project Change Order Approval - Bill
Helbig, Gloria Mantz
It was moved by Deputy Mayor Higgins and seconded to authorize the City Manager to approve Change
Order No. 38 with Max J. Kuney Company in the amount of $129, 500. Director Helbig reminded Council
that as he previously mentioned, staff will be periodically bringing Council change orders regarding this
project; said this is change order #38 and that one of the goals is to keep the project moving forward; he
noted staff will continue to work closely with WSDOT as they develop and review all change orders and
all change orders that increase the amount of the contract will come before Council for approval, as the
$350,000 authorization limit has been reached. Mayor Haley invited public comment. Mr. John Harding,
Spokane Valley: said the more change orders we see the more it seems that someone isn't doing their job;
and he asked about who is in charge of this process and who has accountability, and that he would like
more information on the change order process. There were no other public comments. In response to
Councilmember Woodard asking for clarification on the process, Mr. Helbig explained that when work is
outside the scope of a contract, the contractors do a change order which included anticipated costs; he said
WSDOT and the City review those and verify our own costs and there is a negotiation process; said not all
change orders are approved by us and WSDOT so there are some that will never be brought forward to
Council. Vote by acclamation: in favor: unanimous. Opposed: none. Motion carried.
NON -ACTION ITEMS:
4. 2022 School Zone Flashing Beacons Update Jerremy Clark
Mr. Clark explained that the installation of nine locations with beacons were included in the 2022 City
budget; and he noted that five of the locations are in the procurement process for installation in early
summer; that the options for Council tonight is to consider to proceed with that installation, or to take other
Council Meeting Minutes, Study Session: 03-29-2022 Page 2 of 3
Approved by Council:
DRAFT
action. Mr. Clark also discussed the replacement of exiting school zone signage as noted on slide 4. As
shown on slide 2, Mr. Clark noted the school and the status for having a flashing beacon; and of those five
locations underway, four are being followed up tonight; i.e. the Learning Academy, Trent Elementary, Ness
Elementary, and Pratt Elementary; and he stated that staff will be coordinating further with East Valley
School District on potential new locations. After discussion about the pros and cons of each of the four
locations with safety being the prime factor, a majority of Councilmember were in favor of moving forward
as proposed.
5. Law Enforcement Interlocal Amendment Erik Lamb, Morgan Koudelka, Chief Ellis
Mr. Lamb explained that this is just one item of all those previously discussed March 8; that we want to
make sure the agreement tracks with what we are doing; he mentioned the law enforcement agreement is a
five-year term which began in 2018 and has a 24-month termination notice but this amendment and
tonight's discussion is not about that roll-over termination as that will be coming forward in the next few
weeks. Mr. Koudelka went over the six highlights of the amendment, as shown on slide 3.
Brief Council discussion included clean energy and hybrid vehicles, with Chief Ellis explaining that we
have purchased two hybrids and they are in test mode but the feedback has not been positive and at this
point they prefer staying with the gas model; there was also mention of shared positions, performance
measures, dedicated vehicles, and radar trailers. There was Council consensus for staff to bring the
amendment forward for a motion consideration.
6. 2023 Congressional Directed Spending Requests — Bill Helbig
Mr. Helbig explained that Senator Murray's office has issued an announcement for Congressionally
Directed Spending, formerly earmarks; that there is no limit to an agency's number of submittals; requests
are due April 5 and do not require any local matching funds. He noted there is a similar request from
Representative McMorris Rodger's office and it is expected that Senator Cantwell will issue a similar
request in the next few weeks. Mr. Helbig said that awards generally range between $1 million and $5
million, and he noted the four projects staff recommends as submittals, and said staff requests Council
consensus to submit the requests to all three federal delegates as the 2023 funding requests are released,
and Council concurred.
7. Advance Agenda — Mayor Haley
There were no additions to the advance agenda.
8. Department Reports
The Department Reports were for information only and were not reported or discussed.
9. Council Comments — Mayor Haley
There were no further comments from Council.
10. City Manager Comments — John Hohman
Mr. Hohman reminded everyone that there is no Council meeting next week, and that this Thursday is our
City's 19th anniversary, and that there is ongoing planning for next year's the 20th anniversary.
It was moved by Councilmember Woodard, seconded and unanimously agreed to adjourn. The meeting
adjourned at 7:15 p.m.
ATTEST: Pam Haley, Mayor
Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk
Council Meeting Minutes, Study Session: 03-29-2022 Page 3 of 3
Approved by Council:
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: April 12, 2022 Department Director Approval:
Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ® new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Motion Consideration: Pines Road/BNSF Grade Separation Project
— Avista Property Donation
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: SVMC 3.34 — Acceptance of Donation and Gifts
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN:
• May 7, 2013: Administrative report, Bridging the Valley,
• June 23, 2015: Council passed Resolution No. 15-005 adopting the 2016-2021 Six Year
Transportation Improvement Program (TIP), which included the project
• January 10, 2017: Motion consideration to acquire Pinecroft property
• February 28, 2017: Council passed Resolution 17-006, amending the 2017 TIP which
included the project
• March 28, 2017: Administrative report seeking Council consensus to move forward with
project design
• May 23, 2017: Resolution No. 17-011 adopting the 2018-2023 Six -Year TIP, which
included the project
• July 11, 2017: Motion consideration to select a Consultant for Phase 1 Design
• October 17, 2017: Admin Report on Design Alternatives
• March 27, 2018: Motion consideration to apply for Spokane Regional Transportation
Council's (SRTC) federal grants, including the project
• May 22, 2018: Motion consideration to apply for Consolidated Rail Infrastructure and
Safety Improvements Program, FY2017, (CRISI #1) grant for the project
• June 5, 2018: Motion consideration to apply for Better Utilizing Investments to Leverage
Development (BUILD) grant
• August 21, 2018: Motion consideration to apply for Consolidated Rail Infrastructure and
Safety Improvements Program, FY2018, (CRISI #2) grant
• December 4, 2018: Admin Report on Design Alternatives
• June 4, 2019: Admin Report on Design Alternatives
• June 4, 2019: Motion consideration to apply for BUILD grant
• June 18, 2019: Motion consideration to advance Alternative 2 to Phase 2 design
• April 14, 2020: Motion consideration to apply for BUILD grant
• May 5, 2020: Motion consideration to authorize city manager to execute design
agreement with HDR
• July 7, 2020: Motion consideration to authorize city manager to acquire the DeWitt
Living Trust property
• July 7, 2020: Motion consideration to authorize city manager to acquire the DeRuwe
property
BACKGROUND: Since 2017, the City has been working on the design of the Pines Road/BNSF
Railroad Grade Separation Project. An early right-of-way (ROW) acquisition of a Pinecroft parcel
was completed for the project in 2017. In 2020, the City acquired three additional parcels for the
project from DeWitt Living Trust and Robin DeRuwe using an FHWA grant and City match.
Avista Corporation (Avista) owns parcels 45033.9126, 45033.9090 and 45033.9091 which are
needed for the project. Staff has been coordinating closely with Avista through the design of the
project. The parcels will be utilized for a portion of the roadways, grading, and drainage for the
new roadways and will also include a new trailhead for the Centennial Trail. The trailhead will
include a restroom, electric vehicle charging station, parking and park amenities for users of the
Centennial Trail and the City's future Spokane River Loop Trail. The appraised combined value
of the parcels is $790,500. Avista has expressed desire to donate these parcels to the City, rather
than the City acquiring them for project use. Staff has also coordinated closely with FHWA to
ensure the value of the donated parcels can be utilized as future federal match requirements.
OPTIONS: Staff is recommending the Council authorize the City Manager to accept the donated
parcels or the Council may take other action as appropriate.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to accept the Avista donation of parcel numbers
45033.9126, 45033.9090, and 45033.9091, for the Pines Road / BNSF Grade Separation Project
and authorize the City Manager to finalize and execute any documents necessary to complete
this transaction.
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: To date, the City has secured funding in excess of $9.7 million
for the project from three sources, a FRA CRISI Grant, a FHWA STP Grant, and City funds. The
City will pay for the closing costs of $2,312.30, needed to complete this transaction from project
funds.
STAFF CONTACT: Gloria Mantz, PE — Engineering Manager
ATTACHMENTS: Presentation
Melanie Rose, Avista Corporation
Gloria Mantz, PE,'''81gineering Manager
Project Funding
Current Funding
City Funds
Federal Railroad Administration (FRA)
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA)
Secured Funding
Funding Gap
Estimated Project Cost
Secured Funding
Funding Gap
$ 4.7 M
$ 1.2 M
$ 3.8 M
$ 9.7 M
$ 34.0 M
$ 9.7 M
$ 24.3 M
Spokane
iValley
Engineering Design Status
Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE) —August 2021
Intersection Plan Approval (IPA) —September 2021
NEPA approval by May of 2022
60 percent design by Fall of 2022
Spokane
iValley
Right -of -Way Status
Acquired Pinecroft Parcel in 2017
w/ City funds
Early Acquisition in 2020 w/
Federal Funds
Fitness Fanatics
2 Vacant Parcels
Avista Donation
Vacant Property
4
EUTU
PEKES
6R100E PA
OF LOOP TRAIL'a
PROJECT
Avista Parcel Donation
Donating 3 Parcels
N3.5 Acres
Public Use
Appraised at $790,500
Trailhead Design
Vehicle & Bus Parking
Restroom
Lighting
EV Charging Station
Connection to Trails
Centennial Trail
Future City Spokane River
Loop Trail
6
--FUTURE
PEDESTRIAN
BRIDGE PART
OF LOOP TRAIL
PROJECT
Next Steps
Obligate Remaining ROW Funds by June 2022
Continue to Advance Project Design
Coordinate with Utility Companies
Continue to Pursue all Available Funding Opportunities
Spokane
iValley
Council Motion & Questions
Motion for City Manager to
Accept Avista Parcel Donations
Questions?
8
FUTU
PETER y�
BRIDGE PART-4
OF LOOP TRAIL.
PROJECT
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: April 12, 2022
Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business
❑ information ❑ admin. report
Department Director Approval:
® new business ❑ public hearing
❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Motion Consideration: 2022 Law Enforcement Interlocal Amendment
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: City of Spokane Valley Interlocal Agreement 17-104
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Interlocal Agreement for Law Enforcement Services
as Provided by the Spokane County Sheriffs Office to the City of Spokane Valley, contract
number 17-104, adopted by Council on July 25, 2017. Last amended by Council on May 4,
2021. Admin report to Council March 29, 2022.
BACKGROUND: The current interlocal agreement (ILA) with Spokane County for the provision
of law enforcement services was adopted by Council in July 2017 for the 5-year period January
1, 2018, through December 31, 2022. The agreement is subject to renew at the end of 2022 for
another five-year period with Council approval. The agreement is amended periodically to
account for changes to services that are approved by Council. The following changes are being
proposed to Council. Many have already been authorized by Council and are being
memorialized though this amendment. Page numbers correspond to Attachment 1.
1. (Page 1) — Corrected address for City of Spokane Valley
2. (Page 3) Section 4.4 — Ownership of dedicated City vehicles that have been fully paid for
shall transfer to City upon termination of agreement.
3. (Pages 3 & 4) Section 5.1.1 — Clarification on allowing temporary movement of
dedicated officers to a shared unit with Police Chief and City Manager approval.
4. (Page 4 and many other pages) - Change "Precinct Commander" to "Assistant Police
Chief'
5. (Page 5) Section 5.2.1 — Clarification that performance measures and workload
indicators will be provided subject to availability of data.
6. (Page 6) Section 6.2 — Language added to prevent unspent City funds from being
diverted to other purposes without prior authorization.
7. (Pages 7 & 8) Section 6.5 — Language added to allow City to pay upfront for dedicated
vehicles and have authorization authority over purchases and location of vehicles.
8. (Page 9) Section 8.5 — Language added to the Domestic Violence detective to work in a
shared unit.
9. (Page 20) Exhibit 1 — Unit acronyms spelled out and report management system
removed.
10. (Page 21) Exhibit 2 — Workload indicators refined to match available data and better
reflect work performed. Behavioral Health indicators and measures added. Refined
performance measures and included cost and budget data.
11. (Page 22) Exhibit 3 — Homeless Services Deputy and Behavioral Health Deputy added.
12. (Page 23) Exhibit 4 — Added two Major Crimes detectives.
OPTIONS: 1.) Authorize City Manager to execute amendment or 2.) request additional
information.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to authorize the City Manager to finalize and
execute the Amended Interlocal Agreement for Law Enforcement Services as Provided by the
Spokane County Sheriff's Office to the City of Spokane Valley, in substantially the form
provided.
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: 2022 Budget for Law Enforcement Agreement is $24,958,601
STAFF/COUNCIL CONTACT: Morgan Koudelka, Senior Administrative Analyst; Erik Lamb,
Deputy City Manager; Dave Ellis, Police Chief.
ATTACHMENTS: 1.) Draft Amended Interlocal Agreement for Law Enforcement Services
(Clean Version) 2.) Draft Amended Interlocal Agreement for Law Enforcement Services with
exhibits (Marked -Up Version)
DRAFT
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT
FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES
AS PROVIDED BY THE SPOKANE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE TO THE
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into among Spokane County, a political
subdivision of the state of Washington, having offices for the transaction of business at 1116
West Broadway Avenue, Spokane, Washington 99260, hereinafter referred to as
"COUNTY," the Spokane County Sheriff, a separate elected official of Spokane County,
having offices for the transaction of business at 1100 West Mallon Avenue, Spokane,
Washington 99260, hereinafter referred to as "SHERIFF" and the City of Spokane Valley, a
municipal corporation of the state of Washington, having offices for the transaction of
business at 10210 East Sprague Avenue, Spokane Valley, Washington 99206, hereinafter
referred to as "CITY," jointly hereinafter referred to as the "Parties" and individually referred
to as "Party".
COUNTY, SHERIFF and CITY agree as follows.
SECTION NO. 1: RECITALS AND FINDINGS
1.1 Under RCW 36.32.120(6), the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County,
acting on behalf of Spokane County, has the care of County property and the management of
County funds and business.
1.2 Under chapter 39.34 RCW ("Interlocal Cooperation Act"), public agencies may contract
with each other to perform certain functions which each may legally perform.
1.3 Under chapter 36.28 RCW, the Spokane County Sheriff is the Chief Law Enforcement
Officer and Conservator of the Peace of Spokane County.
1.4 The City of Spokane Valley desires to utilize the services of the Spokane County Sheriff's
Office to provide law enforcement services.
1.5 The direct and indirect costs for law enforcement services will be set forth in the Law
Enforcement Cost Allocation Plan ("LECAP"), described in Section 6 and incorporated
herein by this reference.
1.6 The Parties, in providing these law enforcement services, seek to make the CITY a crime -
free city.
SECTION NO. 2: DEFINITIONS
2.1 Agreement: "Agreement" means this Interlocal Agreement among Sheriff, City and
County regarding the provision of law enforcement services.
Page 1 of 25
DRAFT
2.2 City: "CITY" means the City of Spokane Valley.
2.3 County: "COUNTY" means Spokane County.
2.4 Dedicated CITY Officers: "Dedicated CITY Officers" means those commissioned
officers (SHERIFF Deputies) listed in Exhibit "3" that are 100% dedicated to providing
service to the CITY and who work under the supervision of the CITY Police Chief.
2.5 Services: "Services" means those services identified in Exhibit 1.
2.6 Sheriff: "SHERIFF" means the duly elected sheriff of Spokane County possessing those
general duties set forth in chapter 36.28 RCW.
2.7 Uncontrollable Circumstances: "Uncontrollable Circumstances" means the following
events: riots, wars, civil disturbances, insurrections, acts of terrorism, external fires and
floods, volcanic eruptions, lightning or earthquakes at or near where the Services are
performed and/or that directly affect providing of such Services.
SECTION NO. 3: PURPOSE
The purpose of this Agreement is to reduce to writing the Parties' understanding as to the
terms and conditions under which SHERIFF will provide Services to CITY. The Services
will be consistent with the City's council/manager form of management pursuant to chapter
35A.13 RCW.
SECTION NO. 4: DURATION AND TERMINATION
4.1 Initial Term and Renewal. The initial term of this Agreement shall commence as of
12:01 A.M. on the date of execution, and run through midnight, December 31, 2022, for all
provisions except for the cost methodology, which shall be implemented beginning on
January 1, 2018. Thereafter, this Agreement shall automatically renew for five-year time
frames, unless the termination process outlined herein is invoked. The Automatic renewal
shall not occur unless the CITY provides notice to the COUNTY that the City Council has
authorized the renewal.
4.2 Process for Termination. This Agreement may be terminated by any Party by providing
written notice after December 31, 2020 to all other Parties. COUNTY shall consult with
SHERIFF prior to providing written notice of termination under this subsection. SHERIFF
shall consult with COUNTY prior to providing written notice of termination under this
subsection. This termination shall be effective (24) twenty-four months after written notice
is provided as long as such written notice is provided prior to midnight December 31, 2022.
The same time intervals for terminations shall apply to future terms if the termination process
is not invoked during the initial contract period.
Page 2 of 25
DRAFT
4.3 Implementation of Termination. When notice of termination is given, SHERIFF and
CITY agree to jointly prepare a Transition Plan and complete by a mutually agreed date.
4.3.1 Transition Plan. The Transition Plan shall identify and address, among other
items (i) personnel issues; (ii) workload; (iii) ongoing case assignments; and (iv) the
transfer of records. If the SHERIFF and CITY cannot mutually agree to the terms of
the Transition Plan, either Party can request arbitration as provided in Section No. 18.
SHERIFF and CITY shall equally share the cost of said arbitration.
4.3.2 Implementation of Transition Plan. Parties agree to use all best efforts to
create and effectuate a mutual implementation of the Transition Plan.
4.4 Termination of the Agreement -Vehicles and Equipment. At the termination of this
Agreement, CITY shall have the option to purchase, subject to agreement of SHERIFF and
COUNTY, COUNTY -owned vehicles and/or equipment used to provide Services.
Ownership of dedicated vehicles that have been fully paid for by CITY shall be transferred to
CITY without cost if City choses to exercise this option.
4.5 Waiver of Statutory Terms. To the extent that it is applicable to law enforcement
Services, the Parties hereby waive the statutory termination rights of RCW 39.34.180(3)
and elect instead to follow these contractual termination procedures as the sole method of
terminating this Agreement, the terms of which are detailed in this section.
4.6 Termination of the Agreement and Settle and Adjust. The Parties recognize that
Costs for Services under the Agreement are calculated utilizing the LECAP. Charges for
the current year are based on estimated costs and are subject to a settle and adjust
reconciliation to actual costs after the year is complete. As such, in the event this
Agreement is terminated as provided for in Subsection 4.2 hereinabove, the Agreement
will be subject to a settle and adjust for any years that have not yet been reconciled. In the
event of termination, the Parties shall follow the process set forth in Section No. 6 to
determine the settle and adjust as well as the process to object to the final adjustment(s) as
set forth in Subsection 6.4 set forth hereinafter.
SECTION NO. 5: SERVICES
5.1 Services Provided and Service Levels. The SHERIFF shall provide those Services
set forth in Exhibit "1," attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. These
Services shall only be changed by mutual written agreement of Parties.
5.1.1 Dedicated CITY Officers. CITY may unilaterally adjust the number of
Dedicated CITY Officers set forth in Exhibit "3" only after meaningful prior
consultation between the SHERIFF and the CITY. Written notice of such an
adjustment shall be provided by CITY to COUNTY and SHERIFF.
Page 3 of 25
DRAFT
The Police Chief shall have the ability to move Dedicated CITY Officers to different
service units or convert to a shared resource on a temporary basis, not to exceed 90
days, to meet current workload demands, with notification to the City Manager.
Moves that exceed 90 days must be approved by the City Manager and be
accompanied by a demonstrated need. A change from a dedicated resource to a
shared resource shall be communicated to the County Budget Office and, if
necessary, an adjustment will be made to the final LECAP to equitably distribute
costs to all users of the resource and remove those costs from the CITY dedicated
costs for the time period matching the move or change.
CITY patrol staffing shall be maintained at a level that allows for a minimum of
one patrol officer per patrol district per shift.
5.1.2 Shared Services. SHERIFF shall provide shared Services listed in Exhibit
"1" to CITY. SHERIFF shall ensure that shared service units work with the Police
Chief and Assistant Police Chief to provide case updates, information, and data as
requested. SHERIFF shall have the ability to make permanent adjustments to the
number of commissioned officers providing Services listed under shared units in
Exhibit "4" after 30 days advanced notice is provided to the CITY and accompanied
with a cost impact estimate and service level impact estimate. The SHERIFF'S
ability to temporarily shift shared personnel to meet emerging needs shall not be
limited.
Any adjustments in Services under this section shall only be operative after relevant
notice and impact bargaining negotiations for reductions in force are satisfied with
the relevant collective bargaining units but in no event shall the delay in
implementation exceed 60 days after the SHERIFF has satisfied his good faith
bargaining obligations pursuant to chapter 41.46 RCW for reductions. Additions
will be filled in 60 days unless staffing shortages delay implementation, in which
case, SHERIFF shall provide to CITY an estimated time to fill new positions added
by CITY, and will continue to provide quarterly updates until the positions are filled.
Any permanent adjustments that take place under this section after the original cost
estimate has been prepared shall result in the COUNTY recalculating the annual
cost estimate and then adjusting the remaining monthly payments unless otherwise
mutually agreed upon by the SHERIFF and City Manager.
Notwithstanding the above, SHERIFF'S ability to fulfill his statutory obligation to
provide law enforcement Services to COUNTY and CITY shall not be limited.
5.2 Periodic Reporting Requirements. SHERIFF shall provide to CITY quarterly
reports, within 30 days from the end of each quarter, that identify statistics used to calculate
CITY'S cost in the LECAP referenced in Section No. 6 below. Those statistics which are
only available to COUNTY on an annual basis shall be provided annually within 30 days
of the end of each calendar year unless the statistics are provided by an outside agency, in
Page 4 of 25
DRAFT
which case they shall be provided within 15 days after they are provided to COUNTY.
These reports will allow CITY to monitor service consumption and cost accrual throughout
the year.
5.2.1 Performance Measures and Workload Indicators. Available data for the
indicators and measures listed in Exhibit "2" shall be provided by SHERIFF to CITY
on a quarterly basis subject to availability of data, unless otherwise mutually agreed
upon by SHERIFF and the City Manager. The indicators and measures shall be
modified jointly by the City Manager and SHERIFF as needed to provide the most
accurate assessment of the Services provided to CITY.
Goals for each performance measure shall be established by the City Manager and the
Police Chief. SHERIFF and CITY shall work together jointly to provide the necessary
support and resources to achieve established goals. Failure to meet established goals
on a quarterly basis shall result in progress reports provided by the Police Chief to the
City Manager. The reports shall indicate the causes of the deficiencies and provide
responsive action taken or recommendations by the Police Chief to correct the
deficiencies as well as progress made toward achieving the goals. The progress reports
shall continue until the deficiency has been corrected.
SECTION NO. 6: COST OF SERVICES
6.1 Cost Methodology. CITY costs will be determined by utilizing the LECAP. The
LECAP will allocate costs through a combination of direct dedicated CITY officer costs;
and shared and indirect costs allocated through mutually agreed upon allocation bases.
Salary and Benefits for Dedicated CITY Officers will be segregated into separate budget
units and costs will be tracked separately.
The allocation bases will be reviewed by the COUNTY and CITY as needed. Any changes
to the allocation bases will be made by staff of the CITY and COUNTY and mutually
agreed upon by the SHERIFF, COUNTY CEO, and the City Manager.
Indirect costs will be applied from the Countywide Cost Allocation Plan, the COCAP. The
COCAP will be prepared in accordance with OMB U.S. Office of Management and Budget
Circular 2 CFR 200.
The CITY shall not be charged for costs unrelated to the provision of law enforcement
Services in the current year, including but not limited to, costs for tax assessor and treasurer
tax collections. CITY shall receive a credit for COCAP building charges and associated
maintenance and utility costs, in recognition of CITY -owned facilities (precinct/garage).
CITY shall also receive a credit for Services paid through other revenue sources and
Services that have been pre -paid by CITY.
Page 5 of 25
DRAFT
6.2 Estimated Costs. The LECAP will be used to estimate CITY cost for Services for a
contract year based upon the contract year's budget. Estimated indirect costs will be
calculated by applying an indirect rate derived from actual indirect costs from the most
recently completed year. CITY shall have 30 days to review the estimated costs and ask
questions. Should the estimate not be provided or not be finalized by the time the invoices
for a new contract year are due, CITY will continue to pay at the previous year's monthly
rate until the estimate is finalized. If the CITY has paid one or more months at the previous
year's rates, the COUNTY will calculate the difference between the previous year's rates
and the current year's monthly estimate for those months and add the difference to the first
monthly payment at the current year's estimate.
COUNTY shall notify CITY of any budget amendments expected to increase CITY' S law
enforcement costs by more than $200,000.
Estimated costs paid by CITY for specific items such as dedicated patrol salary shall not
be diverted to other expenses without prior authorization by the City. CITY will work with
Police Chief and Assistant Police Chief to process such requests expeditiously.
This section does not diminish the SHERIFF'S state constitutional and statutory law
enforcement powers pursuant to chapter 36.28 RCW, nor his ability to expediently respond
to emergencies.
6.3 Settle and Adjust. The LECAP will be used to calculate the actual CITY cost for the
contract year based upon the contract year's actual expenses. After calculating the CITY'S
actual costs for a contract year, any overage or underage from the estimated billed amount
will be applied to the next invoice. Should the contract no longer be in effect, payment by
either Party will be due within 30 days of agreement of the final amount.
COUNTY shall provide CITY with the actual cost calculations for the contract year in writing
via the LECAP no later than September 30th of any calendar year for the preceding year's
costs. CITY will have thirty (30) calendar days from its receipt of the LECAP to provide
COUNTY with any written objections to the amounts set forth therein. COUNTY agrees to
consider all written objections received from CITY and reply to CITY no later than fifteen
(15) calendar days of receipt of CITY'S objections. In the event the Parties cannot mutually
resolve any written objection(s) submitted by CITY within an additional fifteen (15) calendar
day time frame, or such other time frame as the Parties may mutually agree to, the objections
shall be resolved pursuant to the Dispute Resolution provisions set forth in Section No. 18.
6.4 Retroactive Salary Adjustments. The Police Chief will inform the CITY of the
commencement and settlement of applicable collective bargaining agreements, as well as
inform CITY of the status of any pending negotiations as to tentative agreements. Should
any applicable bargaining agreement not be settled in time to include any salary adjustments
granted commissioned deputies under any collective bargaining agreement in the cost
estimate for a given year, and that collective bargaining agreement is settled, and the
settlement contains a retroactive salary adjustment, COUNTY will bill CITY for the full
Page 6 of 25
DRAFT
amount of CITY' S portion of the retroactive payment. CITY will be responsible for paying
COUNTY within thirty (30) days of the billing date. Additionally, COUNTY may recalculate
the estimated Interlocal Agreement amount employing the cost of living or wage increase(s)
granted commissioned deputies under any collective bargaining agreement and adjust the
remaining monthly payments.
6.5 Capital Purchases. Capital equipment deemed necessary for all commissioned
officers, excluding vehicles, with a cost greater than $50,000, may be billed to CITY at the
time of purchase contingent upon prior CITY authorization. CITY will be billed according
to its proportionate share. COUNTY will bill CITY for this cost at the time of the purchase
and payment will be due within 30 days of the billing date. As part of the settle and adjust
reconciliation, COUNTY will give CITY credit for the full amount paid for capital
equipment in that year. The Parties may also jointly agree to apply this language to capital
purchases of any amount on a case -by -case basis.
All capital items purchased by COUNTY will become the property of COUNTY. All items
purchased by CITY will become the property of CITY. Capital items that have been
purchased with grant funds by either CITY or COUNTY, or other funding sources, and
capital items that are not utilized in providing law enforcement Services to CITY, will not
be charged to CITY. All capital items that are utilized in providing law enforcement
Services to CITY, and which are not immediately billed to CITY according to the terms
stated in this section, and that were not purchased with other funding sources, will be
incorporated as fixed assets in the (COCAP) and reimbursed through depreciation.
County shall consult with CITY prior to committing to capital purchases that exceed
$200,000. Typical recurring expenses such as vehicles are exempt from this requirement.
Beginning in 2022, CITY will be billed for the entire cost of dedicated vehicles in the year
the vehicles were purchased and received. Vehicles purchased prior to 2022 will continue
to be billed through depreciation in the COCAP. Orders related to CITY dedicated vehicles
and the subsequent disposition of those vehicles shall require prior written approval by
CITY. Shared vehicles will typically be supplied through the equitable transfer of vehicles
from dedicated units from CITY and COUNTY once the dedicated vehicles are replaced
by new vehicles. In some cases, new vehicles may need to be purchased for shared units;
efforts will be made to utilize existing revenue sources but if these sources are not available
the COUNTY will purchase the vehicles and depreciate the CITY'S share of costs
according to current allocation bases. Additionally, salvage value received through the
sale of CITY dedicated vehicles will be placed into a combined CITY/COUNTY reserve
to be used to replace wrecked vehicles, purchase atypical needs such as transport trailers,
and purchase specialty vehicles as funds allow. Use of the CITY/COUNTY reserve funds
shall require prior written approval from the SHERIFF and CITY, which shall not be
unreasonably withheld.
6.6 Billing Procedure. COUNTY will bill CITY for one -twelfth of calculated estimated
contract amount during the first week of each month. Regular monthly payments by CITY
Page 7 of 25
DRAFT
will be due by the end of the month in which they are billed. Should the bill be received at a
later date, the City shall have 21 days to process the payment.
6.7 Penalty. At the sole option of COUNTY, a penalty may be assessed on any late payment
owed by CITY in an amount equal to lost interest earnings had the payment been timely paid
and invested in the Spokane County Treasurer's Investment Pool.
Any resolution of a disputed amount through use of the arbitration process identified in
Section No. 18 shall include at the request of any Party, a determination of whether interest
is appropriate, including the amount.
SECTION NO. 7: MUNICIPAL POLICE AUTHORITY
CITY shall retain all police powers and, by virtue of this Agreement, CITY confers municipal
police authority on the SHERIFF.
SECTION NO. 8: OFFICER ASSIGNMENT, RETENTION, DISCIPLINE AND
HIRING
COUNTY is acting hereunder as an independent contractor as to:
8.1 Hiring. The SHERIFF shall hire, assign, retain and discipline all employees according
to applicable collective bargaining agreements, civil service rules, and state and federal laws.
8.2 Standards of Performance Governed by the SHERIFF. Control of personnel,
standards of performance, discipline and all other aspects of performance shall be governed
by the SHERIFF. Provided, however that only qualified, trained personnel meeting all of the
requirements of applicable state laws or regulations shall be utilized in the performance of
Services.
8.3 Assignment of Dedicated CITY Officers. SHERIFF or his designee and Police Chief
shall work together to determine the personnel assigned to fill Dedicated CITY Officer
positions. SHERIFF and CITY will work together to encourage Dedicated City Officer
retention and fill open positions to provide continuity of Services. SHERIFF or his designee
and the City Manager shall discuss anticipated openings due to retirements and transfers to
other agencies and jointly determine how to best prepare to fill those vacancies.
8.4 Patrol Districts. Patrol districts for the CITY are established in Exhibit "5". The patrol
districts will coincide within CITY limits A patrol district is a geographical area of a size and
configuration designed to minimize response times to citizen's calls for Services. Response
is typically measured from the time a call is received to the time the unit arrives on the scene.
If the boundary of the CITY limits change, the SHERIFF will work together with the City
Manager and the Police Chief to determine if a change to the number of patrol districts is
necessary. The Police Chief will also periodically evaluate the calls for Service and other
impacts to response times and make recommendations to the City Manager, if necessary,
Page 8 of 25
DRAFT
regarding changes to patrol districts. All changes to the number of patrol districts in CITY
shall be authorized by the Council and SHERIFF.
8.5 Dedicated CITY Units and Officers, Mutual Aid. SHERIFF recognizes that he is
providing sworn police Services dedicated to CITY. Dedicated CITY Service units,
established in Exhibit "1", and the Dedicated CITY Officers, established in Exhibit "3",
shall work under the supervision of the Police Chief and be located at the CITY Precinct
Building except the Domestic Violence Detective who works in a shared unit under the
Shared Investigative Lieutenant. CITY dedicated officers shall be provided in the number
of officers shown in Exhibit "3". Service units identified as "Shared Resources" in Exhibit
"4" shall be shared between the CITY and COUNTY and costs shall be allocated according
to bases mutually agreed upon by staff.
8.5.1 Mutual Aid. Dedicated CITY Officers shall provide mutual aid to other local
law enforcement agencies, when possible, for emergency requests. Additionally,
Dedicated CITY Officers and COUNTY Officers shall continue to assist each other
and work together, sharing information and resources when mutually beneficial.
Dedicated CITY Officers may be assigned to regional task force units and directed
by the Police Chief to assist with investigations outside of the CITY limits for cases
that have a regional impact and benefit the CITY as well as other local jurisdictions.
This section does not diminish the SHERIFF'S State Constitutional and statutory law
enforcement powers pursuant to chapter 36.28 RCW, nor his ultimate authority over all
SHERIFF'S Office employees.
SECTION NO. 9: CITY POLICE CHIEF AND ASSISTANT POLICE CHIEF
SELECTION, REMOVAL AND DUTIES, AS WELL AS CITY MANAGER'S AND
SHERIFF'S RESPONSIBILITIES THERETO
9.1 Selection of Police Chief or Assistant Police Chief. When, for any reason, there
occurs a vacancy in the position of Police Chief or Assistant Police Chief, the SHERIFF
shall designate three or more SHERIFF Deputies of the rank of Lieutenant or higher, or as
otherwise agreed by the parties, as candidates for each of the positions of Police Chief or
Assistant Police Chief. The positions of Police Chief or Assistant Police Chief shall be
appointed from said lists of qualified candidates by the City Manager.
9.2 Removal of Police Chief or Assistant Police Chief.
9.2.1 Removal by SHERIFF. The SHERIFF may remove the Police Chief or
Assistant Police Chief at any time after consultation with the City Manager.
9.2.2 Removal by City Manager. The SHERIFF shall remove the Police Chief or
Assistant Police Chief at any time after the written request and consultation of the
City Manager.
Page 9 of 25
DRAFT
9.2.3 Reduction of Assistant Police Chief's Rank Due to Economic Conditions.
A reduction in SHERIFF'S Office Civil Service Rank due to economic necessity
shall not be the sole basis for the removal of the appointed Assistant Police Chief
by either the City Manager or the SHERIFF.
9.3 Duties of Police Chief. The Police Chief shall report to the City Manager or his/her
designee and to the existing command structure within SHERIFF'S Office.
The duties of the Police Chief shall include:
9.3.1 Working with the City Manager or his/her designee to establish goals,
objectives and performance measures for CITY police Services which reflect specific
needs within CITY;
9.3.2 Coordinating police activities within CITY, including hours of operation and
CITY -specific protocols and procedures, attending meetings and providing reports as
requested by the City Manager and such other duties common to a city police chief
including enforcement of CITY codes and ordinances;
9.3.3 Reviewing the performance of all Dedicated CITY Officers. Reporting to City
Manager or his/her designee and SHERIFF any serious recommendations for
performance improvement;
9.3.4 Identify duties of all Dedicated CITY Officers as specific needs arise or as
requested by the City Manager or his/her designee within the context of established
policies and procedures. Reporting to SHERIFF any changes in duty of Dedicated
CITY Officers;
9.3.5 Overseeing implementation within CITY of all SHERIFF policies and
procedures. Maintaining a copy of SHERIFF procedures on file at City Hall for
CITY'S reference. SHERIFF shall be notified of any public record requests to view
or obtain a copy of the policies and procedures on file;
9.3.6 Notifying and providing electronic access to the City Manager or his/her
designee of any change in SHERIFF procedures or policies, or resource as permitted
by this Agreement;
9.3.7 Identifying areas of supplemental training for Dedicated CITY Officers. Making
recommendations to SHERIFF for supplemental training. Making recommendations
to the City Manager or his/her designee for training not provided by SHERIFF;
9.3.8 Providing supervision and direction to all Dedicated CITY Officers as well as
other assigned personnel, and acting as liaison with SHERIFF Command Staff;
Page 10 of 25
DRAFT
9.3.9 Maintaining communication between the City Manager and SHERIFF command
structures to ensure that changes in SHERIFF policies are agreeable to CITY and that
change in CITY policies are agreeable to SHERIFF. In the event a CITY procedure,
policy, goal or operation differs from the SHERIFF'S, City Manager or his/her
designee, SHERIFF and COUNTY shall meet and mutually determine which policy
will prevail;
9.3.10 Notifying the City Manager or his/her designee of any significant criminal
occurrence or civil emergency within CITY or region that would impact the public
safety or operations of CITY, and
9.3.11 Coordinating with City Manager regarding maintenance and capital
improvement needs of the CITY Precinct Building.
9.4 Duties of the Assistant Police Chief. Assistant Police Chief shall act as Police Chief in
his/her absence and under the Police Chief as CITY Police Department's primary
administrative assistant, and also work with CITY staff to provide data as requested and
complete information required for CITY planning documents.
9.5 Duties of the City Manager. The City Manager or his/her designee shall have the
responsibility of providing general direction and supervision to the assigned Police Chief
relative to the furnishing of law enforcement Services to CITY as set forth in chapter 35A.13
RCW and the terms of this Agreement.
9.6 Duties of the SHERIFF. The SHERIFF or his designee shall make regular visits to the
CITY Precinct Building and ensure that SHERIFF policies and procedures are being followed
and that law enforcement Service is provided to CITY according to the terms of this
Agreement and according to the standards of the SHERIFF. At the request of the City
Manager, SHERIFF will make presentations to the Council and appearances at CITY
functions as his schedule permits.
9.7 Quarterly Meetings - Sheriff and City Manager. The SHERIFF and the City Manager
shall meet on a quarterly basis to ensure regular communication and to seek joint
consideration of all matters of concern regarding this Agreement. Either party may invite
representatives from their respective organizations to attend. It is intended that the Parties
in these meetings review the Interlocal Agreement and discuss matters of mutual interest;
monitor cost trends, work jointly on potential cost savings, revenue sources and other
budgetary matters that may impact Service levels; seek long-term sustainability of contract
terms; consider changes in labor contracts, review allocation of resources or other items
that may impact either party. The dates of these meetings will be determined by mutual
agreement but should coincide with the budget cycles of each party.
9.8 Quarterly Meeting — Financial and Contract Administration Representatives. At
the request of CITY, COUNTY, or SHERIFF, representatives shall meet to discuss
potential changes to the COCAP, the LECAP, or other items that may impact the CITY'S
Page 11 of 25
DRAFT
law enforcement costs or Service levels. If possible, CITY shall be notified of such
changes prior to implementation, allowing CITY an opportunity to comment.
SECTION NO. 10: OBSERVATION OF LABOR NEGOTIATIONS
CITY may participate with other cities that contract with COUNTY for law enforcement
Services to select no more than two (2) representatives from the contracting cities to observe
labor negotiations between COUNTY, SHERIFF and the collective bargaining units
representing the employees of the SHERIFF, provided that such observers adhere to rules
established by COUNTY, the SHERIFF and the bargaining units for the negotiations.
SECTION NO. 11: PROPERTY, EQUIPMENT AND TRAINING
11.1 Ownership of Property and Equipment. The ownership of all property and
equipment utilized in association with either SHERIFF or CITY meeting their responsibilities
under the terms of this Agreement, shall remain with the original owner at all times to include
termination, unless otherwise specifically and mutually agreed upon in writing by the Parties
to this Agreement.
11.2 Stationery, Notices and Forms. CITY shall supply at its own cost and expense
any special supplies, logos or patches, stationery, notices, forms where such must be issued
in the name of CITY.
11.3 Additional Technology. CITY desires to maintain a police force that is trained and
equipped with the latest technology. SHERIFF agrees to provide police service personnel
providing Services under this Agreement that are trained and equipped with such
technology as is customarily provided to deputies providing law enforcement Services in
the unincorporated areas of the County. Any technology not currently in use or not
customarily provided to patrol deputies, may be requested by CITY or SHERIFF. Parties
agree to meet and confer over the need for the acquisition, training, or use of new
technology with the final decision regarding the acquisition and use of new technology
resting solely with the SHERIFF so long as CITY and COUNTY have the necessary
financial resources to acquire such technology and train Dedicated CITY Officers in its
use. Such costs shall be born solely by the CITY.
11.4 Additional Training. CITY has indicated that it may desire to have the Dedicated
CITY Officers providing Services to CITY under the terms of this Agreement attend
additional or supplemental training. The SHERIFF agrees not to unreasonably withhold
approval of any written request(s) by CITY for Dedicated CITY Officers providing
Services under the terms of this Agreement to attend additional or supplemental training.
The SHERIFF may also require Dedicated CITY Officers assigned to provide Services to
CITY under the terms of this Agreement to participate in necessary state and federal
training and conferences that focus on the prevention of crime and the protection of
CITY'S citizens. The costs of any additional or supplemental training requested by CITY
Page 12 of 25
DRAFT
under this section and approved by the SHERIFF, or determined necessary by the
SHERIFF shall be born solely by CITY.
11.5 Police Department Building, Maintenance, and Janitorial. CITY will provide
offices, to include sufficient parking, for the City of Spokane Valley Police Department
located at 12710 E. Sprague Avenue, City of Spokane Valley, 99216 or at such other
location mutually agreed to between the CITY and SHERIFF. CITY shall provide all
operation, maintenance and janitorial services for said offices.
SECTION NO. 12: COMMUNITY IDENTITY
12.1 Vehicles. Patrol, Traffic, School Resource Officer, and Community Service vehicles
that are assigned to CITY shall display the color, identification and logo of CITY at CITY' S
sole expense. Additionally, the vehicles will indicate that they are SHERIFF vehicles.
SHERIFF and CITY will determine the form of identification jointly. Detective and
Supervisor vehicles may be left unmarked.
12.2 Uniform. SHERIFF maintains a uniform directed by state law. It is a uniform that
carries a great deal of pride. CITY recognizes that the assigned personnel will retain the
uniform of the Spokane County Sheriff's Office; however, SHERIFF agrees that assigned
personnel shall wear additional identification in the nature of a patch, clearly indicating
affiliation with CITY on uniforms, jackets, and jumpsuits. Jumpsuits shall include the word
"Police" in large type on the back. The nature and design of any additional identification will
be determined jointly by SHERIFF and CITY and provided to SHERIFF by CITY at CITY'S
sole expense.
SECTION NO. 13: RECORDS
All records prepared, owned, used or retained by COUNTY or SHERIFF in conjunction with
providing Services under the terms of this Agreement shall be deemed COUNTY property
and shall be made available to CITY upon request by the City Manager subject to the records
retention schedule set forth by the Washington State Secretary of State, the attorney client and
attorney work product privileges set forth in statute, court rule or case law. The Parties agree
to cooperate in complying with the provisions of chapter 42.56 RCW. Should the Agreement
terminate, the Parties will meet, and discuss the nature and extent of records required to be
transferred to the successor agency. The COUNTY agrees to effect the transfer no later than
the last day of the contract. The cost of any transfers of records to the control of the CITY
under this provision shall be assumed solely by the CITY.
SECTION NO. 14: UNCONTROLLABLE CIRCUMSTANCES/IMPOSSIBILITY
A delay or interruption in or failure of performance of all or any part of this Agreement
resulting from Uncontrollable Circumstances shall be deemed not a default under this
Agreement.
Page 13 of 25
DRAFT
A delay or interruption in or failure of performance of all or any part of this Agreement
resulting from any change in or new law, order, rule or regulation of any nature which
renders providing of Services in accordance with the terms of this Agreement legally
impossible, and any other circumstances beyond the control of the SHERIFF, which render
legally impossible the performance by the SHERIFF of its obligations under this
Agreement, shall be deemed not a default under this Agreement.
SECTION NO. 15: RELATIONSHIP OF THE PARTIES
For the purpose of this section, the terminology "COUNTY" shall also include SHERIFF.
The Parties intend that an independent contractor relationship will be created by this
Agreement. COUNTY shall be an independent contractor and not the agent or employee of
CITY, that CITY is interested only in the results to be achieved and that the right to control
the particular manner, method and means in which the Services are performed is solely within
the discretion of the SHERIFF. Any and all employees who provide Services to CITY under
this Agreement shall be deemed employees solely of the SHERIFF. The SHERIFF shall be
solely responsible for the conduct and actions of all employees under this Agreement and any
liability that may attach thereto. Likewise, no agent, employee, servant or representative of
CITY shall be deemed to be an employee, agent, servant or representative of the SHERIFF
or COUNTY for any purpose.
SECTION NO. 16: LIABILITY
For the purpose of this section, the terminology "COUNTY" shall also include the
"PROSECUTING ATTORNEY."
(a) COUNTY shall indemnify and hold harmless CITY and its officers, agents, and
employees, from any and all claims, actions, suits, liability, loss, costs, expenses, and damages
of any nature whatsoever, by any reason of or arising out of any negligent act or omission of
COUNTY, its officers, agents and employees, relating to or arising out of performing Services
pursuant to this Agreement. In the event that any suit based upon such claim, action, loss, or
damages is brought against CITY, COUNTY shall defend the same at its sole cost and
expense and if final judgment in said suit be rendered against CITY, and its officers, agents,
and employees, or jointly against CITY and COUNTY and their respective officers, agents,
and employees, COUNTY shall satisfy the same.
(b) CITY shall indemnify and hold harmless COUNTY and its officers, agents, and
employees, from any and all claims, actions, suits, liability, loss, costs, expenses, and damages
of any nature whatsoever, by any reason of or arising out of any negligent act or omission of
CITY, its officers, agents and employees, relating to or arising out of performing Services
pursuant to this Agreement. In the event that any suit based upon such claim, action, loss, or
damages is brought against COUNTY, CITY shall defend the same at its sole cost and
expense and if final judgment in said suit be rendered against COUNTY, and its officers,
Page 14 of 25
DRAFT
agents, and employees, or jointly against COUNTY and CITY and their respective officers,
agents, and employees, CITY shall satisfy the same.
(c) If the comparative negligence of the Parties and their officers and employees is a cause
of such damage or injury, the liability, loss, cost, or expense shall be shared between the
Parties in proportion to their relative degree of negligence and the right of indemnity shall
apply to such proportion.
(d) Where an officer or employee of a Party is acting under the direction and control of the
other Party, the Party directing and controlling the officer or employee in the activity and/or
omission giving rise to liability shall accept all liability for the other Party's officer or
employee's negligence.
(e) Each Party's duty to indemnify shall survive the termination or expiration of this
Agreement.
(f) The foregoing indemnity is specifically intended to constitute a waiver of each Party's
immunity under Washington's Industrial Insurance Act, chapter 51 RCW, respecting the
other party only, and only to the extent necessary to provide the indemnified Party with a full
and complete indemnity of claims made by the indemnitor's employees. The Parties
acknowledge that these provisions were specifically negotiated and agreed upon by them.
(g) COUNTY and CITY agree to either self insure or purchase polices of insurance covering
the matters contained in this Agreement with coverages of not less than $5,000,000 per
occurrence with $5,000,000 aggregate limits including professional liability and auto.
SECTION NO. 17: INITIATIVES AND LOCAL BUDGET REDUCTIONS
The Parties recognize that revenue -reducing initiative(s) passed by the voters of Washington
and/or local revenue reductions (i.e. loss of sales tax) and/or local government mandates may
substantially reduce local operating revenue for CITY, COUNTY or both Parties. The Parties
agree that it is necessary to have flexibility to reduce the contracted amount(s) in this
Agreement in response to budget constraints resulting from the passage of State-wide
revenue -reducing initiative(s) and/or local revenue reductions and/or local government
mandates. If such an event occurs, the Parties agree to negotiate in good faith to achieve a
mutually agreeable resolution in a timely fashion.
SECTION NO. 18: DISPUTE RESOLUTION
Any dispute regarding the interpretation of, failure to perform, or the costs for Services
assessed under the terms of this Agreement between the SHERIFF, COUNTY or CITY shall
first be reduced to writing and considered by the COUNTY CEO ("Chief Executive Officer")
and the City Manager if it is a monetary dispute. If it is a non -monetary dispute, it shall be
reduced to writing and considered by the SHERIFF and City Manager. The City Manager
and the COUNTY CEO or SHERIFF shall agree to develop a corrective action plan to address
Page 15 of 25
DRAFT
any dispute covered in this section. The action plan shall be completed within 30 days of
agreement to develop the action plan unless the Parties agree to extend this timeline. The
action plan shall be implemented by the SHERIFF within 30 days of completion of the action
plan. If the SHERIFF or CEO fails to complete or implement an action plan, discontinues the
action plan without agreement by the City Manager, or the dispute otherwise remains
unresolved, the dispute may be submitted to arbitration by any Party.
COUNTY or SHERIFF, respectively, and CITY shall have the right to designate one person
each to act as an arbitrator. The two selected arbitrators shall then jointly select a third
arbitrator. The decision of the arbitration panel shall be binding on the Parties and shall be
subject to judicial review as provided for in chapter 7.04A RCW.
The costs of the arbitration panel shall be equally split between the respective Parties.
SECTION NO. 19: ASSIGNMENT
No party may assign in whole or part its interest in this Agreement without the written
approval of the other Parties. Nothing in this section shall prohibit COUNTY or SHERIFF
from contracting with third parties for Services provided for in this Agreement.
SECTION NO. 20: NOTICES
All notices called for or provided for in this Agreement shall be in writing and must be served
on any of the Parties either personally or by certified mail, return -receipt requested, sent to
the Parties at their respective addresses herein above given. Notices sent by certified mail
shall be deemed served when deposited in the United States mail, postage prepaid.
SECTION NO. 21: VENUE STIPULATION
This Agreement has been and shall be construed as having been made and delivered within
the State of Washington and it is mutually understood and agreed by each Party that this
Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Washington, both as to
interpretation and performance. Any action at law, suit in equity or judicial proceeding for
the enforcement of this Agreement, or any provision hereto, shall be instituted only in courts
of competent jurisdiction within Spokane County, Washington.
SECTION NO. 22: COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS
The Parties shall observe all federal, state and local laws, ordinances and regulations, to the
extent that they may be applicable to the terms of this Agreement.
SECTION NO. 23: DISCLAIMER
Except as otherwise provided, this Agreement shall not be construed in any manner that
would limit either Party's authority or powers under law.
Page 16 of 25
DRAFT
SECTION NO. 24: HEADINGS
The Section and subsection headings appearing in this Agreement have been inserted solely
for the purpose of convenience and ready reference. In no way do they purport to, and shall
not be deemed to, define, limit or extend the scope or intent of the sections to which they
pertain.
SECTION NO. 25: ALL WRITINGS CONTAINED HEREIN
This Agreement contains all the terms and conditions agreed upon by the Parties. No other
understandings, oral or otherwise, regarding the subject matter of this Agreement shall be
deemed to exist or to bind any of the Parties. Parties have read and understand the whole of
the above Agreement and now state that no representations, promises or agreements not
expressed in this Agreement have been made to induce either to execute the same.
SECTION NO. 26: COUNTERPARTS
This Agreement may be executed in any number of multiple signed originals, each of which,
when so executed and delivered, shall be an original, but such counterparts shall together
constitute but one and the same.
SECTION NO. 27: AGREEMENT TO BE FILED
COUNTY shall file this Agreement with such offices or agencies as required by chapter 39.34
RCW.
SECTION NO. 28: TIME OF ESSENCE OF AGREEMENT
Time is of the essence of this Agreement and in case any Party fails to perform the
obligations on its part to be performed at the time fixed for the performance of the
respective obligation by the terms of this Agreement, the other respective Party may, at its
election, hold the other Party liable for all costs and damages caused by such delay.
SECTION NO. 29: CHAPTER 39.34 RCW REQUIRED CLAUSES
A. Purpose. See Section No. 3 above.
B. Agreement to be Filed. See Section No. 27 above.
C. Duration. See Section No. 4 above.
D. Termination. See Section No. 4 above.
Page 17 of 25
DRAFT
E. Organization of Separate Entity and Its Powers. No new or separate legal or
administrative entity is created to administer the provisions of this Agreement.
F. Responsibilities of the Parties. See applicable sections within Agreement.
G. Property upon Termination. See Section Nos. 4.4 and 11 above.
SECTION NO. 30: SEVERABILITY
The Parties agree that if any parts, terms or provisions of this Agreement are held by the courts
to be illegal, the validity of the remaining portions or provisions shall not be affected and the
rights and obligations of the Parties shall not be affected in regard to the remainder of the
Agreement. If it should appear that any part, term or provision of this Agreement is in conflict
with any statutory provision of the State of Washington, then the part, term or provision
thereof that may be in conflict shall be deemed inoperative and null and void insofar as it may
be in conflict therewith and this Agreement shall be deemed to modify to conform to such
statutory provision.
SECTION NO. 31: THIRD PARTY BENEFICIARIES.
This Agreement is intended for the benefit of COUNTY, CITY and SHERIFF and not for
the benefit of any third parties.
SECTION NO. 32. SURVIVAL
Without being exclusive, Section Nos. 16, 20, and 21 of this Agreement shall survive any
termination, expiration or determination of invalidity of this Agreement in whole or in part.
Any other sections of this Agreement which, by their sense and context, are intended to
survive shall also survive.
SECTION NO. 33. MEDIA RELEASES AND CONTACT
Media releases concerning law enforcement activities covered under this Agreement will
be prepared by the SHERIFF'S Public Information Officer. Any such release of
information to the media that is deemed to be sensitive or likely to cause concern or alarm
shall be provided to the City Manager before its release. CITY shall not issue any media
releases regarding law enforcement activities covered under this Agreement without prior
approval of the SHERIFF unless otherwise agreed by the Parties. SHERIFF will endeavor
to have the Police Chief or designee interact with the media when appropriate. SHERIFF'S
ability to interact with the media on CITY' S behalf shall not be limited by this section.
SECTION NO. 34: MODIFICATION
This Agreement may only be modified in writing by the mutual written agreement of the
Parties.
Page 18 of 25
DRAFT
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have caused this Agreement to be executed on the
date and year opposite their respective signatures.
DATED: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
ATTEST:
CLERK OF THE BOARD
BY:
GINNA VASQUEZ
MARY KUNEY, Chair
AL FRENCH, Vice -Chair
JOSH KERNS, Commissioner
**********
DATED: SPOKANE COUNTY SHERIFF:
OZZIE KNEZOVICH
**********
DATED: CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY:
JOHN HOHMAN, City Manager
Attest:
CHRISTINE BAINBRIDGE
City Clerk
Approved as to form only:
Office of the City Attorney
Page 19 of 25
DRAFT
Exhibit 1— Services Provided to CITY by SHERIFF
CITY Dedicated Service Units
CITY Police Department Administration (Chief, Assistant Chief, Sergeant)
Patrol
Traffic
Community Services
Domestic Violence
School Resource Officers
K-9
Property and Drug Crimes Investigations
Shared Service Units
Major Crimes
Sex Crimes
Spokane County Investigative Unit
Joint Terrorism Task Force
Safe Streets (Drug Task Force and Gang Enforcement)
Emergency Operations Team
Public Information Officer
Training/Professional Standards
SHERIFF'S Community Oriented Policing Effort / SHERIFF'S Incident Response Team
Spokane Regional Emergency Communications services — Radio Dispatch, Crime Check,
Computer Aided Dispatch, Communications
Helicopter
Forensics
Records Management
Property Storage
Explosive Disposal
Regional Investigative Group 9 - Crime Analysis
Garage
Firing Range
Fleet
SWAT/Hostage Negotiation
Tactical Unit
Extra Duty Employment
Reservist and Explorer Units
Civilian Administrative Support
Regional Services
Civil
Marine Patrol
SHERIFF
Sex Offender Registration
Page 20 of 25
DRAFT
Exhibit 2 — Performance Measures and Workload Indicators
Workload Indicators
Total incidents per Dedicated CITY Patrol Officer per shift
Total citizen initiated Calls for Service
Total citizen initiated Calls for Service with Dedicated CITY Patrol Officer response
Total Dedicated CITY Officer initiated incidents
Total Dedicated CITY Officer involved incidents
Total incidents requiring written documentation
Total incidents resulting in custodial arrest
Total traffic non -criminal infractions/citations issued
Total traffic control requests worked
Total traffic collisions investigated
Total Major Crime investigations
Total Sex Crime investigations
Total Property/Drug Crime investigations
Behavioral Health Deputy — To match 2021 WASPC Grant Report
Performance Measures
Average patrol staffing per shift
Citizen complaints per 1,000 Dedicated CITY Officer incidents
Outcome of complaint investigations (% sustained, not sustained, exonerated, unfounded,
pending, changed to inquiry)
Complaints per 1,000 Dedicated CITY Officer incidents
Outcome of use of force incidents (% within policy and not within policy)
Average response time for priority 1, 2, and 3 Calls for Service
Percentage of Calls for Service with deputy response
Percentage of incidents that were deputy initiated
Percentage of solvable property crime cases assigned
Percentage of assigned cases solved by investigative unit
Percentage of assigned cases solved by charges filed by investigative unit
Collisions per capita
Percentage of traffic complaints worked
Actual to Budget Cost Comparisons for all Dedicated and Shared units (Salary, overtime,
fuel)
Behavioral Health Deputy — Time Saved
Page 21 of 25
DRAFT
Exhibit 3 - Dedicated CITY Officers
Administrative
Police Chief / Undersheriff 1
Assistant Chief / Inspector 1
Sergeant 1
Patrol
Lieutenant 2
Sergeant 9
Deputies 47
K-9 Deputies 3
Traffic
Sergeant 1
Detectives/Corporal 1
Deputies 5
Community Services
Deputy 1
Behavioral Health
Deputy
Homeless Services
Deputy
Domestic Violence
Detective/Corporal
1
1
1
School Resource Officer
Deputies 4
Property and Drug Crimes
Sergeant 1
Detectives 10
Deputy 1
Total Dedicated Officers 91
Page 22 of 25
DRAFT
Exhibit 4 - Combined Number of Officers in Shared Units
Investigations
Captain Undersheriff 1
Lieutenant 1
DEA Deputy 1
Major Crimes
Sergeant 1
Detectives 6
Sex Crimes
Sergeant 1
Detectives 6 7
Investigative Task Force Spokane County Investigative Unit (SCIU)
Lieutenant 1
Regional Intelligence Group
Detective 1
Joint Terrorism Task Force
Detective 1
Safe Streets ( Drug and Gangs)
Sergeant
Detectives
Deputies
1
4 3
1
Emergency Operations Team
Deputy 2
Command Staff
Undersheriff
1
Public Information Officer
Sergeant Corporal 1
Professional Standards
Lieutenant 1
Training
Lieutenant
Sergeant
Corporal
Deputies
1
2 3
2- 1
1
Page 23 of 25
DRAFT
Total Shared Officers 35
Page 24 of 25
DRAFT
Fra ncis
Va11e1
1
Exhibit 5 - CITY Patrol Districts
*-01°'
sun E
11!'•
1+
li, T
Erdwin
IIMMIMIIMENNE
v
,� ■ILL ds — f..
o. 1LEI rz i
2 A"es Spokane Valley Police D
Page 25 of 25
DRAFT
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT
FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES
AS PROVIDED BY THE SPOKANE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE TO THE
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into among Spokane County, a political
subdivision of the state of Washington, having offices for the transaction of business at 1116
West Broadway Avenue, Spokane, Washington 99260, hereinafter referred to as
"COUNTY," the Spokane County Sheriff, a separate elected official of Spokane County,
having offices for the transaction of business at 1100 West Mallon Avenue, Spokane,
Washington 99260, hereinafter referred to as "SHERIFF" and the City of Spokane Valley, a
municipal corporation of the state of Washington, having offices for the transaction of
business at the Redwood Plaza, 102107 East Sprague Avenue, Suite 106, Spokane Valley,
Washington 99206 (10210 E. Sprague after August 31, 2017), hereinafter referred to as
"CITY," jointly hereinafter referred to as the "Parties" and individually referred to as "Party".
COUNTY, SHERIFF and CITY agree as follows.
SECTION NO. 1: RECITALS AND FINDINGS
1.1 Under RCW 36.32.120(6), the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County,
acting on behalf of Spokane County, has the care of County property and the management of
County funds and business.
1.2 Under chapter 39.34 RCW ("Interlocal Cooperation Act"), public agencies may contract
with each other to perform certain functions which each may legally perform.
1.3 Under chapter 36.28 RCW, the Spokane County Sheriff is the Chief Law Enforcement
Officer and Conservator of the Peace of Spokane County.
1.4 The City of Spokane Valley desires to utilize the services of the Spokane County Sheriff's
Office to provide law enforcement services.
1.5 The direct and indirect costs for law enforcement services will be set forth in the Law
Enforcement Cost Allocation Plan ("LECAP"), described in Section 6 and incorporated
herein by this reference.
1.6 The Parties, in providing these law enforcement services, seek to make the CITY a crime -
free city.
Page 1 of 27
SECTION NO. 2: DEFINITIONS
2.1 Agreement: "Agreement" means this Interlocal Agreement among Sheriff, City and
County regarding the provision of law enforcement services.
2.2 City: "CITY" means the City of Spokane Valley.
2.3 County: "COUNTY" means Spokane County.
2.4 Dedicated CITY Officers: "Dedicated CITY Officers" means those commissioned
officers (SHERIFF Deputies) listed in Exhibit "3" that are 100% dedicated to providing
service to the CITY and who work under the supervision of the CITY Police Chief.
2.5 Services: "Services" means those services identified in Exhibit 1.
2.6 Sheriff: "SHERIFF" means the duly elected sheriff of Spokane County possessing those
general duties set forth in chapter 36.28 RCW.
2.7 Uncontrollable Circumstances: "Uncontrollable Circumstances" means the following
events: riots, wars, civil disturbances, insurrections, acts of terrorism, external fires and
floods, volcanic eruptions, lightning or earthquakes at or near where the Services are
performed and/or that directly affect providing of such Services.
SECTION NO. 3: PURPOSE
The purpose of this Agreement is to reduce to writing the Parties' understanding as to the
terms and conditions under which SHERIFF will provide Services to CITY. The Services
will be consistent with the City's council/manager form of management pursuant to chapter
35A.13 RCW.
SECTION NO. 4: DURATION AND TERMINATION
4.1 Initial Term and Renewal. The initial term of this Agreement shall commence as of
12:01 A.M. on the date of execution, and run through midnight, December 31, 2022, for all
provisions except for the cost methodology, which shall be implemented beginning on
January 1, 2018. Thereafter, this Agreement shall automatically renew for five-year time
frames, unless the termination process outlined herein is invoked. The Automatic renewal
shall not occur unless the CITY provides notice to the COUNTY that the City Council has
authorized the renewal.
4.2 Process for Termination. This Agreement may be terminated by any Party by providing
written notice after December 31, 2020 to all other Parties. COUNTY shall consult with
SHERIFF prior to providing written notice of termination under this subsection. SHERIFF
shall consult with COUNTY prior to providing written notice of termination under this
subsection. This termination shall be effective (24) twenty-four months after written notice
Page 2 of 27
is provided as long as such written notice is provided prior to midnight December 31, 2022.
The same time intervals for terminations shall apply to future terms if the termination process
is not invoked during the initial contract period.
4.3 Implementation of Termination. When notice of termination is given, SHERIFF and
CITY agree to jointly prepare a Transition Plan and complete by a mutually agreed date.
4.3.1 Transition Plan. The Transition Plan shall identify and address, among other
items (i) personnel issues; (ii) workload; (iii) ongoing case assignments; and (iv) the
transfer of records. If the SHERIFF and CITY cannot mutually agree to the terms of
the Transition Plan, either Party can request arbitration as provided in Section No. 18.
SHERIFF and CITY shall equally share the cost of said arbitration.
4.3.2 Implementation of Transition Plan. Parties agree to use all best efforts to
create and effectuate a mutual implementation of the Transition Plan.
4.4 Termination of the Agreement -Vehicles and Equipment. At the termination of this
Agreement, CITY shall have the option to purchase, subject to agreement of SHERIFF and
COUNTY, COUNTY -owned vehicles and/or equipment used to provide Services.
Ownership of dedicated vehicles that have been fully paid for by CITY shall be transferred to
CITY without cost if City chosen to exercise this option.
4.5 Waiver of Statutory Terms. To the extent that it is applicable to law enforcement
Services, the Parties hereby waive the statutory termination rights of RCW 39.34.180(3)
and elect instead to follow these contractual termination procedures as the sole method of
terminating this Agreement, the terms of which are detailed in this section.
4.6 Termination of the Agreement and Settle and Adjust. The Parties recognize that
Costs for Services under the Agreement are calculated utilizing the LECAP. Charges for
the current year are based on estimated costs and are subject to a settle and adjust
reconciliation to actual costs after the year is complete. As such, in the event this
Agreement is terminated as provided for in Subsection 4.2 hereinabove, the Agreement
will be subject to a settle and adjust for any years that have not yet been reconciled. In the
event of termination, the Parties shall follow the process set forth in Section No. 6 to
determine the settle and adjust as well as the process to object to the final adjustment(s) as
set forth in Subsection 6.4 set forth hereinafter.
SECTION NO. 5: SERVICES
5.1 Services Provided and Service Levels. The SHERIFF shall provide those Services
set forth in Exhibit "1," attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. These
Services shall only be changed by mutual written agreement of Parties.
5.1.1 Dedicated CITY Officers. CITY may unilaterally adjust the number of
Dedicated CITY Officers set forth in Exhibit "3" only after meaningful prior
Page 3 of 27
consultation between the SHERIFF and the CITY. Written notice of such an
adjustment shall be provided by CITY to COUNTY and SHERIFF.
The Police Chief shall have the ability to move Dedicated CITY Officers to different
service units or convert to a shared resource on a temporary basis, not to exceed 90
days, to meet current workload demands, with notification to the City Manager.
Moves that exceed 90 days must be approved by the City Manager and be
accompanied by a demonstrated need. A change from a dedicated resource to a
shared resource shall be communicated to the County Budget Office and, if
necessary, an adjustment will be made to the final LECAP to equitably distribute
costs to all users of the resource and remove those costs from the CITY dedicated
costs for the time period matching the move or change.
CITY patrol staffing shall be maintained at a level that allows for a minimum of
one patrol officer per patrol district per shift.
5.1.2 Shared Services. SHERIFF shall provide shared Services listed in Exhibit
"1" to CITY. SHERIFF shall ensure that shared service units work with the Police
Chief and Precinct CommanderAssistant Police Chief to provide case updates,
information, and data as requested. SHERIFF shall have the ability to make
permanent adjustments to the number of commissioned officers providing Services
listed under shared units in Exhibit "4" after 30 days advanced notice is provided to
the CITY and accompanied with a cost impact estimate and service level impact
estimate. The SHERIFF's ability to temporarily shift shared personnel to meet
emerging needs shall not be limited.
Any adjustments in Services under this section shall only be operative after relevant
notice and impact bargaining negotiations for reductions in force are satisfied with
the relevant collective bargaining units but in no event shall the delay in
implementation exceed 60 days after the SHERIFF has satisfied his good faith
bargaining obligations pursuant to chapter 41.46 RCW for reductions. Additions
will be filled in 60 days unless staffing shortages delay implementation, in which
case, SHERIFF shall provide to CITY an estimated time to fill new positions added
by CITY, and will continue to provide quarterly updates until the positions are filled.
Any permanent adjustments that take place under this section after the original cost
estimate has been prepared shall result in the COUNTY recalculating the annual
cost estimate and then adjusting the remaining monthly payments unless otherwise
mutually agreed upon by the SHERIFF and City Manager.
Notwithstanding the above, SHERIFF'S ability to fulfill his statutory obligation to
provide law enforcement Services to COUNTY and CITY shall not be limited.
5.2 Periodic Reporting Requirements. SHERIFF shall provide to CITY quarterly
reports, within 30 days from the end of each quarter, that identify statistics used to calculate
Page 4 of 27
CITY'S cost in the LECAP referenced in Section No. 6 below. Those statistics which are
only available to COUNTY on an annual basis shall be provided annually within 30 days
of the end of each calendar year unless the statistics are provided by an outside agency, in
which case they shall be provided within 15 days after they are provided to COUNTY.
These reports will allow CITY to monitor service consumption and cost accrual throughout
the year.
5.2.1 Performance Measures and Workload Indicators. Available data for the
indicators and measures listed in Exhibit "2" shall be provided by SHERIFF to CITY
on a quarterly basis subject to availability of data, unless otherwise mutually agreed
upon by SHERIFF and the City Manager. The indicators and measures shall be
modified jointly by the City Manager and SHERIFF as needed to provide the most
accurate assessment of the Services provided to CITY.
Goals for each performance measure shall be established by the City Manager and the
Police Chief. SHERIFF and CITY shall work together jointly to provide the necessary
support and resources to achieve established goals. Failure to meet established goals
on a quarterly basis shall result in progress reports provided by the Police Chief to the
City Manager. The reports shall indicate the causes of the deficiencies and provide
responsive action taken or recommendations by the Police Chief to correct the
deficiencies as well as progress made toward achieving the goals. The progress reports
shall continue until the deficiency has been corrected.
SECTION NO. 6: COST OF SERVICES
6.1 Cost Methodology. CITY costs will be determined by utilizing the LECAP. The
LECAP will allocate costs through a combination of direct dedicated CITY officer costs;
and shared and indirect costs allocated through mutually agreed upon allocation bases.
Salary and Benefits for Dedicated CITY Officers will be segregated into separate budget
units and costs will be tracked separately.
The allocation bases will be reviewed by the COUNTY and CITY as needed. Any changes
to the allocation bases will be made by staff of the CITY and COUNTY and mutually
agreed upon by the SHERIFF, COUNTY CEO, and the City Manager.
Indirect costs will be applied from the Countywide Cost Allocation Plan, the COCAP. The
COCAP will be prepared in accordance with OMB U.S. Office of Management and Budget
Circular 2 CFR 200.
The CITY shall not be charged for costs unrelated to the provision of law enforcement
Services in the current year, including but not limited to, costs for tax assessor and treasurer
tax collections. CITY shall receive a credit for COCAP building charges and associated
maintenance and utility costs, in recognition of CITY -owned facilities (precinct/garage).
Page 5 of 27
CITY shall also receive a credit for Services paid through other revenue sources and
Services that have been pre -paid by CITY.
6.2 Estimated Costs. The LECAP will be used to estimate CITY cost for Services for a
contract year based upon the contract year's budget. Estimated indirect costs will be
calculated by applying an indirect rate derived from actual indirect costs from the most
recently completed year. CITY shall have 30 days to review the estimated costs and ask
questions. Should the estimate not be provided or not be finalized by the time the invoices
for a new contract year are due, CITY will continue to pay at the previous year's monthly
rate until the estimate is finalized. If the CITY has paid one or more months at the previous
year's rates, the COUNTY will calculate the difference between the previous year's rates
and the current year's monthly estimate for those months and add the difference to the first
monthly payment at the current year's estimate.
COUNTY shall notify CITY of any budget amendments expected to increase CITY's law
enforcement costs by more than $200,000.
Estimated costs paid by CITY for specific items such as dedicated patrol salary shall not
be diverted to other expenses without prior authorization by the City. CITY will work with
Police Chief and Assistant Police Chief to process such requests expeditiously —as
possible.
This section does not diminish the SHERIFF's state constitutional and statutory law
enforcement powers pursuant to chapter 36.28 RCW, nor his ability to expediently respond
to emergencies.
6.3 Settle and Adjust. The LECAP will be used to calculate the actual CITY cost for the
contract year based upon the contract year's actual expenses. After calculating the CITY's
actual costs for a contract year, any overage or underage from the estimated billed amount
will be applied to the next invoice. Should the contract no longer be in effect, payment by
either Party will be due within 30 days of agreement of the final amount.
COUNTY shall provide CITY with the actual cost calculations for the contract year in writing
via the LECAP no later than September 30th of any calendar year for the preceding year's
costs. CITY will have thirty (30) calendar days from its receipt of the LECAP to provide
COUNTY with any written objections to the amounts set forth therein. COUNTY agrees to
consider all written objections received from CITY and reply to CITY no later than fifteen
(15) calendar days of receipt of CITY'S objections. In the event the Parties cannot mutually
resolve any written objection(s) submitted by CITY within an additional fifteen (15) calendar
day time frame, or such other time frame as the Parties may mutually agree to, the objections
shall be resolved pursuant to the Dispute Resolution provisions set forth in Section No. 18.
6.4 Retroactive Salary Adjustments. The Police Chief will inform the CITY of the
commencement and settlement of applicable collective bargaining agreements, as well as
Page 6 of 27
inform CITY of the status of any pending negotiations as to tentative agreements. Should
any applicable bargaining agreement not be settled in time to include any salary adjustments
granted commissioned deputies under any collective bargaining agreement in the cost
estimate for a given year, and that collective bargaining agreement is settled, and the
settlement contains a retroactive salary adjustment, COUNTY will bill CITY for the full
amount of CITY's portion of the retroactive payment. CITY will be responsible for paying
COUNTY within thirty (30) days of the billing date. Additionally, COUNTY may recalculate
the estimated Interlocal Agreement amount employing the cost of living or wage increase(s)
granted commissioned deputies under any collective bargaining agreement and adjust the
remaining monthly payments.
6.5 Capital Purchases. Capital equipment deemed necessary for all commissioned
officers, excluding vehicles, with a cost greater than $50,000, may be billed to CITY at the
time of purchase contingent upon prior CITY authorization. CITY will be billed according
to its proportionate share. COUNTY will bill CITY for this cost at the time of the purchase
and payment will be due within 30 days of the billing date. As part of the settle and adjust
reconciliation, COUNTY will give CITY credit for the full amount paid for capital
equipment in that year. The Parties may also jointly agree to apply this language to capital
purchases of any amount on a case -by -case basis.
All capital items purchased by COUNTY will become the property of COUNTY. All items
purchased by CITY will become the property of CITY. Capital items that have been
purchased with grant funds by either CITY or COUNTY, or other funding sources, and
capital items that are not utilized in providing law enforcement Services to CITY, will not
be charged to CITY. All capital items that are utilized in providing law enforcement
Services to CITY, and which are not immediately billed to CITY according to the terms
stated in this section, and that were not purchased with other funding sources, will be
incorporated as fixed assets in the (COCAP) and reimbursed through depreciation.
County shall consult with CITY prior to committing to capital purchases that exceed
$200,000. Typical recurring expenses such as vehicles are exempt from this requirement.
Beginning in the year 2022, CITY will be billed for the entire cost of dedicated vehicles
in the year the vehicles were purchased and received. Vehicles purchased prior to 2022
will continue to be billed through depreciation in the COCAP. Orders related to CITY
dedicated vehicles and the subsequent disposition of those vehicles shall require prior
written approvalwill be approved in advance by CITY. Shared vehicles will typically be
supplied through the equitable transfer of vehicles from dedicated units from CITY and
COUNTY once the dedicated vehicles are replaced by new vehicles. In some cases, new
vehicles may need to be purchased for shared units; efforts will be made to utilize
existing revenue sources but if these sources are not available the COUNTY will
purchase the vehicles and depreciate the CITY's share of costs according to current
allocation bases. Additionally, salvage value received through the sale of CITY
dedicated vehicles will be placed into a combined CITY/COUNTY reserve to be used to
replace wrecked vehicles, purchase atypical needs such as transport trailers, and purchase
Page 7 of 27
specialty vehicles as funds allow. CITY will authorize uUse of the CITY/COUNTY
reserve funds shall require prior written approval from the along with SHERIFF andbut
CITY, which shall not be unreasonably withheld delay or withhold authorization.
6.6 Billing Procedure. COUNTY will bill CITY for one -twelfth of calculated estimated
contract amount during the first week of each month. Regular monthly payments by CITY
will be due by the end of the month in which they are billed. Should the bill be received at a
later date, the City shall have 21 days to process the payment.
6.7 Penalty. At the sole option of COUNTY, a penalty may be assessed on any late payment
owed by CITY in an amount equal to lost interest earnings had the payment been timely paid
and invested in the Spokane County Treasurer's Investment Pool.
Any resolution of a disputed amount through use of the arbitration process identified in
Section No. 18 shall include at the request of any Party, a determination of whether interest
is appropriate, including the amount.
SECTION NO. 7: MUNICIPAL POLICE AUTHORITY
CITY shall retain all police powers and, by virtue of this Agreement, CITY confers municipal
police authority on the SHERIFF.
Page 8 of 27
SECTION NO. 8: OFFICER ASSIGNMENT, RETENTION, DISCIPLINE AND
HIRING
COUNTY is acting hereunder as an independent contractor as to:
8.1 Hiring. The SHERIFF shall hire, assign, retain and discipline all employees according
to applicable collective bargaining agreements, civil service rules, and state and federal laws.
8.2 Standards of Performance Governed by the SHERIFF. Control of personnel,
standards of performance, discipline and all other aspects of performance shall be governed
by the SHERIFF. Provided, however that only qualified, trained personnel meeting all of the
requirements of applicable state laws or regulations shall be utilized in the performance of
Services.
8.3 Assignment of Dedicated CITY Officers. SHERIFF or his designee and Police Chief
shall work together to determine the personnel assigned to fill Dedicated CITY Officer
positions. SHERIFF and CITY will work together to encourage Dedicated City Officer
retention and fill open positions to provide continuity of Services. SHERIFF or his designee
and the City Manager shall discuss anticipated openings due to retirements and transfers to
other agencies and jointly determine how to best prepare to fill those vacancies.
8.4 Patrol Districts. Patrol districts for the CITY are established in Exhibit "5". The patrol
districts will coincide within CITY limits A patrol district is a geographical area of a size and
configuration designed to minimize response times to citizen's calls for Services. Response
is typically measured from the time a call is received to the time the unit arrives on the scene.
If the boundary of the CITY limits change, the SHERIFF will work together with the City
Manager and the Police Chief to determine if a change to the number of patrol districts is
necessary. The Police Chief will also periodically evaluate the calls for Service and other
impacts to response times and make recommendations to the City Manager, if necessary,
regarding changes to patrol districts. All changes to the number of patrol districts in CITY
shall be authorized by the Council and SHERIFF.
8.5 Dedicated CITY Units and Officers, Mutual Aid. SHERIFF recognizes that he is
providing sworn police Services dedicated to CITY. Dedicated CITY Service units,
established in Exhibit "1", and the Dedicated CITY Officers, established in Exhibit "3",
shall work under the supervision of the Police Chief and be located at the CITY Precinct
Building except the Domestic Violence Detective who works in a shared unit under the
Shared Investigative Lieutenant. CITY dedicated officers shall be provided in the number
of officers shown in Exhibit "3". Service units identified as "Shared Resources" in Exhibit
"4" shall be shared between the CITY and COUNTY and costs shall be allocated according
to bases mutually agreed upon by staff.
8.5.1 Mutual Aid. Dedicated CITY Officers shall provide mutual aid to other local
law enforcement agencies, when possible, for emergency requests. Additionally,
Dedicated CITY Officers and COUNTY Officers shall continue to assist each other
Page 9 of 27
and work together, sharing information and resources when mutually beneficial.
Dedicated CITY Officers may be assigned to regional task force units and directed
by the Police Chief to assist with investigations outside of the CITY limits for cases
that have a regional impact and benefit the CITY as well as other local jurisdictions.
This section does not diminish the SHERIFF's State Constitutional and statutory law
enforcement powers pursuant to chapter 36.28 RCW, nor his ultimate authority over all
SHERIFF's Office employees.
SECTION NO. 9: CITY POLICE CHIEF AND PRECINCT
COMMANDERASSISTANT POLICE CHIEF SELECTION, REMOVAL AND
DUTIES, AS WELL AS CITY MANAGER'S AND SHERIFF's RESPONSIBILITIES
THERETO
9.1 Selection of Police Chief or Precinct CommandcrAssistant Police Chief. When,
for any reason, there occurs a vacancy in the position of Police Chief or Precinct
CommanderAssistant Police Chief, the SHERIFF shall designate three or more SHERIFF
Deputies of the rank of Lieutenant or higher, or as otherwise agreed by the parties, as
candidates for each of the positions of Police Chief or Precinct CommanderAssistant Police
Chief. The positions of Police Chief or Precinct CommanderAssistant Police Chief shall
be appointed from said lists of qualified candidates by the City Manager.
9.2 Removal of Police Chief or Precinct Comma dcrAssistant Police Chief.
9.2.1 Removal by SHERIFF. The SHERIFF may remove the Police Chief or
Precinct CommanderAssistant Police Chief at any time after consultation with the
City Manager.
9.2.2 Removal by City Manager. The SHERIFF shall remove the Police Chief or
Precinct CommanderAssistant Police Chief at any time after the written request and
consultation of the City Manager.
9.2.3 Reduction of Precinct CommanderAssistant Police Chief's Rank Due to
Economic Conditions. A reduction in SHERIFF's Office Civil Service Rank due
to economic necessity shall not be the sole basis for the removal of the appointed
Precinct CommanderAssistant Police Chief by either the City Manager or the
SHERIFF.
9.3 Duties of Police Chief. The Police Chief shall report to the City Manager or his/her
designee and to the existing command structure within SHERIFF's Office.
The duties of the Police Chief shall include:
Page 10 of 27
9.3.1 Working with the City Manager or his/her designee to establish goals,
objectives and performance measures for CITY police Services which reflect specific
needs within CITY;
9.3.2 Coordinating police activities within CITY, including hours of operation and
CITY -specific protocols and procedures, attending meetings and providing reports as
requested by the City Manager and such other duties common to a city police chief
including enforcement of CITY codes and ordinances;
9.3.3 Reviewing the performance of all Dedicated CITY Officers. Reporting to City
Manager or his/her designee and SHERIFF any serious recommendations for
performance improvement;
9.3.4 Identify duties of all Dedicated CITY Officers as specific needs arise or as
requested by the City Manager or his/her designee within the context of established
policies and procedures. Reporting to SHERIFF any changes in duty of Dedicated
CITY Officers;
9.3.5 Overseeing implementation within CITY of all SHERIFF policies and
procedures. Maintaining a copy of SHERIFF procedures on file at City Hall for
CITY'S reference. SHERIFF shall be notified of any public record requests to view
or obtain a copy of the policies and procedures on file;
9.3.6 Notifying and providing electronic access to the City Manager or his/her
designee of any change in SHERIFF procedures or policies, or resource as permitted
by this Agreement;
9.3.7 Identifying areas of supplemental training for Dedicated CITY Officers. Making
recommendations to SHERIFF for supplemental training. Making recommendations
to the City Manager or his/her designee for training not provided by SHERIFF;
9.3.8 Providing supervision and direction to all Dedicated CITY Officers as well as
other assigned personnel, and acting as liaison with SHERIFF Command Staff;
9.3.9 Maintaining communication between the City Manager and SHERIFF command
structures to ensure that changes in SHERIFF policies are agreeable to CITY and that
change in CITY policies are agreeable to SHERIFF. In the event a CITY procedure,
policy, goal or operation differs from the SHERIFF's, City Manager or his/her
designee, SHERIFF and COUNTY shall meet and mutually determine which policy
will prevail;
9.3.10 Notifying the City Manager or his/her designee of any significant criminal
occurrence or civil emergency within CITY or region that would impact the public
safety or operations of CITY, and
Page 11 of 27
9.3.11 Coordinating with City Manager regarding maintenance and capital
improvement needs of the CITY Precinct Building.
9.4 Duties of the D ceinct CommanderAssistant Police Chief. The Precinct
CommanderAssistant Police Chief shall act as Police Chief in his/her absence and under the
Police Chief as CITY Police Department's primary administrative assistant, and also work
with CITY staff to provide data as requested and complete information required for CITY
planning documents.
9.5 Duties of the City Manager. The City Manager or his/her designee shall have the
responsibility of providing general direction and supervision to the assigned Police Chief
relative to the furnishing of law enforcement Services to CITY as set forth in chapter 35A.13
RCW and the terms of this Agreement.
9.6 Duties of the SHERIFF. The SHERIFF or his designee shall make regular visits to the
CITY Precinct Building and ensure that SHERIFF policies and procedures are being followed
and that law enforcement Service is provided to CITY according to the terms of this
Agreement and according to the standards of the SHERIFF. At the request of the City
Manager, SHERIFF will make presentations to the Council and appearances at CITY
functions as his schedule permits.
9.7 Quarterly Meetings - Sheriff and City Manager. The SHERIFF and the City Manager
shall meet on a quarterly basis to ensure regular communication and to seek joint
consideration of all matters of concern regarding this Agreement. Either party may invite
representatives from their respective organizations to attend. It is intended that the Parties
in these meetings review the Interlocal Agreement and discuss matters of mutual interest;
monitor cost trends, work jointly on potential cost savings, revenue sources and other
budgetary matters that may impact Service levels; seek long-term sustainability of contract
terms; consider changes in labor contracts, review allocation of resources or other items
that may impact either party. The dates of these meetings will be determined by mutual
agreement but should coincide with the budget cycles of each party.
9.8 Quarterly Meeting — Financial and Contract Administration Representatives. At
the request of CITY, COUNTY, or SHERIFF, representatives shall meet to discuss
potential changes to the COCAP, the LECAP, or other items that may impact the CITY's
law enforcement costs or Service levels. If possible, CITY shall be notified of such
changes prior to implementation, allowing CITY an opportunity to comment.
SECTION NO. 10: OBSERVATION OF LABOR NEGOTIATIONS
CITY may participate with other cities that contract with COUNTY for law enforcement
Services to select no more than two (2) representatives from the contracting cities to observe
labor negotiations between COUNTY, SHERIFF and the collective bargaining units
representing the employees of the SHERIFF, provided that such observers adhere to rules
established by COUNTY, the SHERIFF and the bargaining units for the negotiations.
Page 12 of 27
SECTION NO. 11: PROPERTY, EQUIPMENT AND TRAINING
11.1 Ownership of Property and Equipment. The ownership of all property and
equipment utilized in association with either SHERIFF or CITY meeting their responsibilities
under the terms of this Agreement, shall remain with the original owner at all times to include
termination, unless otherwise specifically and mutually agreed upon in writing by the Parties
to this Agreement.
11.2 Stationery, Notices and Forms. CITY shall supply at its own cost and expense
any special supplies, logos or patches, stationery, notices, forms where such must be issued
in the name of CITY.
11.3 Additional Technology. CITY desires to maintain a police force that is trained and
equipped with the latest technology. SHERIFF agrees to provide police service personnel
providing Services under this Agreement that are trained and equipped with such
technology as is customarily provided to deputies providing law enforcement Services in
the unincorporated areas of the County. Any technology not currently in use or not
customarily provided to patrol deputies, may be requested by CITY or SHERIFF. Parties
agree to meet and confer over the need for the acquisition, training, or use of new
technology with the final decision regarding the acquisition and use of new technology
resting solely with the SHERIFF so long as CITY and COUNTY have the necessary
financial resources to acquire such technology and train Dedicated CITY Officers in its
use. Such costs shall be born solely by the CITY.
11.4 Additional Training. CITY has indicated that it may desire to have the Dedicated
CITY Officers providing Services to CITY under the terms of this Agreement attend
additional or supplemental training. The SHERIFF agrees not to unreasonably withhold
approval of any written request(s) by CITY for Dedicated CITY Officers providing
Services under the terms of this Agreement to attend additional or supplemental training.
The SHERIFF may also require Dedicated CITY Officers assigned to provide Services to
CITY under the terms of this Agreement to participate in necessary state and federal
training and conferences that focus on the prevention of crime and the protection of
CITY'S citizens. The costs of any additional or supplemental training requested by CITY
under this section and approved by the SHERIFF, or determined necessary by the
SHERIFF shall be born solely by CITY.
11.5 Police Department Building, Maintenance, and Janitorial. CITY will provide
offices, to include sufficient parking, for the City of Spokane Valley Police Department
located at 12710 E. Sprague Avenue, City of Spokane Valley, 99216 or at such other
location mutually agreed to between the CITY and SHERIFF. CITY shall provide all
operation, maintenance and janitorial services for said offices.
Page 13 of 27
SECTION NO. 12: COMMUNITY IDENTITY
12.1 Vehicles. Patrol, Traffic, School Resource Officer, and Community Service vehicles
that are assigned to CITY shall display the color, identification and logo of CITY at CITY's
sole expense. Additionally, the vehicles will indicate that they are SHERIFF vehicles.
SHERIFF and CITY will determine the form of identification jointly. Detective and
Supervisor vehicles may be left unmarked.
12.2 Uniform. SHERIFF maintains a uniform directed by state law. It is a uniform that
carries a great deal of pride. CITY recognizes that the assigned personnel will retain the
uniform of the Spokane County Sheriff's Office; however, SHERIFF agrees that assigned
personnel shall wear additional identification in the nature of a patch, clearly indicating
affiliation with CITY on uniforms, jackets, and jumpsuits. Jumpsuits shall include the word
"Police" in large type on the back. The nature and design of any additional identification will
be determined jointly by SHERIFF and CITY and provided to SHERIFF by CITY at CITY's
sole expense.
SECTION NO. 13: RECORDS
All records prepared, owned, used or retained by COUNTY or SHERIFF in conjunction with
providing Services under the terms of this Agreement shall be deemed COUNTY property
and shall be made available to CITY upon request by the City Manager subject to the records
retention schedule set forth by the Washington State Secretary of State, the attorney client and
attorney work product privileges set forth in statute, court rule or case law. The Parties agree
to cooperate in complying with the provisions of chapter 42.56 RCW. Should the Agreement
terminate, the Parties will meet, and discuss the nature and extent of records required to be
transferred to the successor agency. The COUNTY agrees to effect the transfer no later than
the last day of the contract. The cost of any transfers of records to the control of the CITY
under this provision shall be assumed solely by the CITY.
SECTION NO. 14: UNCONTROLLABLE CIRCUMSTANCES/IMPOSSIBILITY
A delay or interruption in or failure of performance of all or any part of this Agreement
resulting from Uncontrollable Circumstances shall be deemed not a default under this
Agreement.
A delay or interruption in or failure of performance of all or any part of this Agreement
resulting from any change in or new law, order, rule or regulation of any nature which
renders providing of Services in accordance with the terms of this Agreement legally
impossible, and any other circumstances beyond the control of the SHERIFF, which render
legally impossible the performance by the SHERIFF of its obligations under this
Agreement, shall be deemed not a default under this Agreement.
SECTION NO. 15: RELATIONSHIP OF THE PARTIES
Page 14 of 27
For the purpose of this section, the terminology "COUNTY" shall also include SHERIFF.
The Parties intend that an independent contractor relationship will be created by this
Agreement. COUNTY shall be an independent contractor and not the agent or employee of
CITY, that CITY is interested only in the results to be achieved and that the right to control
the particular manner, method and means in which the Services are performed is solely within
the discretion of the SHERIFF. Any and all employees who provide Services to CITY under
this Agreement shall be deemed employees solely of the SHERIFF. The SHERIFF shall be
solely responsible for the conduct and actions of all employees under this Agreement and any
liability that may attach thereto. Likewise, no agent, employee, servant or representative of
CITY shall be deemed to be an employee, agent, servant or representative of the SHERIFF
or COUNTY for any purpose.
SECTION NO. 16: LIABILITY
For the purpose of this section, the terminology "COUNTY' shall also include the
"PROSECUTING ATTORNEY."
(a) COUNTY shall indemnify and hold harmless CITY and its officers, agents, and
employees, from any and all claims, actions, suits, liability, loss, costs, expenses, and damages
of any nature whatsoever, by any reason of or arising out of any negligent act or omission of
COUNTY, its officers, agents and employees, relating to or arising out of performing Services
pursuant to this Agreement. In the event that any suit based upon such claim, action, loss, or
damages is brought against CITY, COUNTY shall defend the same at its sole cost and
expense and if final judgment in said suit be rendered against CITY, and its officers, agents,
and employees, or jointly against CITY and COUNTY and their respective officers, agents,
and employees, COUNTY shall satisfy the same.
(b) CITY shall indemnify and hold harmless COUNTY and its officers, agents, and
employees, from any and all claims, actions, suits, liability, loss, costs, expenses, and damages
of any nature whatsoever, by any reason of or arising out of any negligent act or omission of
CITY, its officers, agents and employees, relating to or arising out of performing Services
pursuant to this Agreement. In the event that any suit based upon such claim, action, loss, or
damages is brought against COUNTY, CITY shall defend the same at its sole cost and
expense and if final judgment in said suit be rendered against COUNTY, and its officers,
agents, and employees, or jointly against COUNTY and CITY and their respective officers,
agents, and employees, CITY shall satisfy the same.
(c) If the comparative negligence of the Parties and their officers and employees is a cause
of such damage or injury, the liability, loss, cost, or expense shall be shared between the
Parties in proportion to their relative degree of negligence and the right of indemnity shall
apply to such proportion.
(d) Where an officer or employee of a Party is acting under the direction and control of the
other Party, the Party directing and controlling the officer or employee in the activity and/or
Page 15 of 27
omission giving rise to liability shall accept all liability for the other Party's officer or
employee's negligence.
(e) Each Party's duty to indemnify shall survive the termination or expiration of this
Agreement.
(f) The foregoing indemnity is specifically intended to constitute a waiver of each Party's
immunity under Washington's Industrial Insurance Act, chapter 51 RCW, respecting the
other party only, and only to the extent necessary to provide the indemnified Party with a full
and complete indemnity of claims made by the indemnitor's employees. The Parties
acknowledge that these provisions were specifically negotiated and agreed upon by them.
(g) COUNTY and CITY agree to either self insure or purchase polices of insurance covering
the matters contained in this Agreement with coverages of not less than $5,000,000 per
occurrence with $5,000,000 aggregate limits including professional liability and auto.
SECTION NO. 17: INITIATIVES AND LOCAL BUDGET REDUCTIONS
The Parties recognize that revenue -reducing initiative(s) passed by the voters of Washington
and/or local revenue reductions (i.e. loss of sales tax) and/or local government mandates may
substantially reduce local operating revenue for CITY, COUNTY or both Parties. The Parties
agree that it is necessary to have flexibility to reduce the contracted amount(s) in this
Agreement in response to budget constraints resulting from the passage of State-wide
revenue -reducing initiative(s) and/or local revenue reductions and/or local government
mandates. If such an event occurs, the Parties agree to negotiate in good faith to achieve a
mutually agreeable resolution in a timely fashion.
SECTION NO. 18: DISPUTE RESOLUTION
Any dispute regarding the interpretation of, failure to perform, or the costs for Services
assessed under the terms of this Agreement between the SHERIFF, COUNTY or CITY shall
first be reduced to writing and considered by the COUNTY CEO ("Chief Executive Officer")
and the City Manager if it is a monetary dispute. If it is a non -monetary dispute, it shall be
reduced to writing and considered by the SHERIFF and City Manager. The City Manager
and the COUNTY CEO or SHERIFF shall agree to develop a corrective action plan to address
any dispute covered in this section. The action plan shall be completed within 30 days of
agreement to develop the action plan unless the Parties agree to extend this timeline. The
action plan shall be implemented by the SHERIFF within 30 days of completion of the action
plan. If the SHERIFF or CEO fails to complete or implement an action plan, discontinues the
action plan without agreement by the City Manager, or the dispute otherwise remains
unresolved, the dispute may be submitted to arbitration by any Party.
COUNTY or SHERIFF, respectively, and CITY shall have the right to designate one person
each to act as an arbitrator. The two selected arbitrators shall then jointly select a third
Page 16 of 27
arbitrator. The decision of the arbitration panel shall be binding on the Parties and shall be
subject to judicial review as provided for in chapter 7.04A RCW.
The costs of the arbitration panel shall be equally split between the respective Parties.
SECTION NO. 19: ASSIGNMENT
No party may assign in whole or part its interest in this Agreement without the written
approval of the other Parties. Nothing in this section shall prohibit COUNTY or SHERIFF
from contracting with third parties for Services provided for in this Agreement.
SECTION NO. 20: NOTICES
All notices called for or provided for in this Agreement shall be in writing and must be served
on any of the Parties either personally or by certified mail, return -receipt requested, sent to
the Parties at their respective addresses herein above given. Notices sent by certified mail
shall be deemed served when deposited in the United States mail, postage prepaid.
SECTION NO. 21: VENUE STIPULATION
This Agreement has been and shall be construed as having been made and delivered within
the State of Washington and it is mutually understood and agreed by each Party that this
Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Washington, both as to
interpretation and performance. Any action at law, suit in equity or judicial proceeding for
the enforcement of this Agreement, or any provision hereto, shall be instituted only in courts
of competent jurisdiction within Spokane County, Washington.
SECTION NO. 22: COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS
The Parties shall observe all federal, state and local laws, ordinances and regulations, to the
extent that they may be applicable to the terms of this Agreement.
SECTION NO. 23: DISCLAIMER
Except as otherwise provided, this Agreement shall not be construed in any manner that
would limit either Party's authority or powers under law.
Page 17 of 27
SECTION NO. 24: HEADINGS
The Section and subsection headings appearing in this Agreement have been inserted solely
for the purpose of convenience and ready reference. In no way do they purport to, and shall
not be deemed to, define, limit or extend the scope or intent of the sections to which they
pertain.
SECTION NO. 25: ALL WRITINGS CONTAINED HEREIN
This Agreement contains all the terms and conditions agreed upon by the Parties. No other
understandings, oral or otherwise, regarding the subject matter of this Agreement shall be
deemed to exist or to bind any of the Parties. Parties have read and understand the whole of
the above Agreement and now state that no representations, promises or agreements not
expressed in this Agreement have been made to induce either to execute the same.
SECTION NO. 26: COUNTERPARTS
This Agreement may be executed in any number of multiple signed originals, each of which,
when so executed and delivered, shall be an original, but such counterparts shall together
constitute but one and the same.
SECTION NO. 27: AGREEMENT TO BE FILED
COUNTY shall file this Agreement with such offices or agencies as required by chapter 39.34
RCW.
SECTION NO. 28: TIME OF ESSENCE OF AGREEMENT
Time is of the essence of this Agreement and in case any Party fails to perform the
obligations on its part to be performed at the time fixed for the performance of the
respective obligation by the terms of this Agreement, the other respective Party may, at its
election, hold the other Party liable for all costs and damages caused by such delay.
SECTION NO. 29: CHAPTER 39.34 RCW REQUIRED CLAUSES
A. Purpose. See Section No. 3 above.
B. Agreement to be Filed. See Section No. 27 above.
C. Duration. See Section No. 4 above.
D. Termination. See Section No. 4 above.
E. Organization of Separate Entity and Its Powers. No new or separate legal or
administrative entity is created to administer the provisions of this Agreement.
Page 18 of 27
F. Responsibilities of the Parties. See applicable sections within Agreement.
G. Property upon Termination. See Section Nos. 4.4 and 11 above.
SECTION NO. 30: SEVERABILITY
The Parties agree that if any parts, terms or provisions of this Agreement are held by the courts
to be illegal, the validity of the remaining portions or provisions shall not be affected and the
rights and obligations of the Parties shall not be affected in regard to the remainder of the
Agreement. If it should appear that any part, term or provision of this Agreement is in conflict
with any statutory provision of the State of Washington, then the part, term or provision
thereof that may be in conflict shall be deemed inoperative and null and void insofar as it may
be in conflict therewith and this Agreement shall be deemed to modify to conform to such
statutory provision.
SECTION NO. 31: THIRD PARTY BENEFICIARIES.
This Agreement is intended for the benefit of COUNTY, CITY and SHERIFF and not for
the benefit of any third parties.
SECTION NO. 32. SURVIVAL
Without being exclusive, Section Nos. 16, 20, and 21 of this Agreement shall survive any
termination, expiration or determination of invalidity of this Agreement in whole or in part.
Any other sections of this Agreement which, by their sense and context, are intended to
survive shall also survive.
SECTION NO. 33. MEDIA RELEASES AND CONTACT
Media releases concerning law enforcement activities covered under this Agreement will
be prepared by the SHERIFF'S Public Information Officer. Any such release of
information to the media that is deemed to be sensitive or likely to cause concern or alarm
shall be provided to the City Manager before its release. CITY shall not issue any media
releases regarding law enforcement activities covered under this Agreement without prior
approval of the SHERIFF unless otherwise agreed by the Parties. SHERIFF will endeavor
to have the Police Chief or designee interact with the media when appropriate. SHERIFF's
ability to interact with the media on CITY's behalf shall not be limited by this section.
Page 19 of 27
SECTION NO. 34: MODIFICATION
This Agreement may only be modified in writing by the mutual written agreement of the
Parties.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have caused this Agreement to be executed on the
date and year opposite their respective signatures.
DATED: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
ATTEST:
CLERK OF THE BOARD
BY:
GINNA VASQUEZ
MARY KUNEY, Chair
AL FRENCH, Vice -Chair
JOSH KERNS, Commissioner
**********
DATED: SPOKANE COUNTY SHERIFF:
OZZIE KNEZOVICH
**********
DATED: CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY:
JOHN HOHMAN, City Manager
Attest:
CHRISTINE BAINBRIDGE
City Clerk
Approved as to form only:
Office of the City Attorney
Page 20 of 27
Exhibit 1— Services Provided to CITY by SHERIFF
CITY Dedicated Service Units
CITY Police Department Administration (Chief, Assistant Chief, Sergeant)
Patrol
Traffic
Community Services
Domestic Violence
School Resource Officers
K-9
Property and Drug Crimes Investigations
Shared Service Units
Major Crimes
Sex Crimes
Spokane County Investigative Unit
Joint Terrorism Task Force
Safe Streets (Drug Task Force and Gang Enforcement)
Emergency Operations Team
Public Information Officer
Training/Professional Standards
SCOPE/SIRTSheriffs Community Oriented Policing Effort / Sheriff's Incident Response
Team
SREC Spokane Regional Emergency Communications services — Radio Dispatch, Crime
Check, Computer Aided Dispatch, Communications
Helicopter
Forensics
Records Management
Property Storage
Explosive Disposal
RIG -Regional Investigative Group 9 - Crime Analysis
Garage
Firing Range
Fleet
SWAT/Hostage Negotiation
Tactical UnitAC
Extra Duty Employment
Reservist and Explorer Units
Civilian Administrative Support
Report Management System
Regional Services
Civil
Marine Patrol
SHERIFF
Page 21 of 27
Sex Offender Registration
Page 22 of 27
Exhibit 2 — Performance Measures and Workload Indicators
Workload Indicators
Total incidents per Dedicated CITY Patrol Officer per shift
Total citizen initiated Calls for Service
Total citizen initiated Calls for Service with Dedicated CITY Patrol Officer response
Total Dedicated CITY Officer initiated incidents
Total Dedicated CITY Officer involved incidents
Total incidents requiring written documentation
Total property crimes
Total crimes against persons
Total incidents resulting in custodial arrest
Total traffic non -criminal infractions/citations issued
Total traffic infractions/citations from citizen complaints
Total traffic control requests worked
Total reported collisionsTotal traffic collisions investigated
Total Major Crime investigations initiated
Total Sex Crime investigations initiated
Total Property/Drug Crime investigations initiated
Behavioral Health Deputy — To match 2021 WASPC Grant Report
Performance Measures
Average patrol staffing per shift
Citizen complaints per 1,000 Dedicated CITY Officer incidents
Outcome of complaint investigations (% sustained, not sustained, exonerated, unfounded,
pending, changed to inquiry)
Use of forceComplaints per 1,000 Dedicated CITY Officer incidents
Outcome of use of force incidents (% within policy and not within policy)
Average response time for priority 1, 2, and 3 Cealls for Service
Percentage of Cealls for Service with deputy response
Percentage of incidents that were deputy initiated
Percentage of solvable property crime cases assigned
Percentage of assigned cases solved by investigative unit
Percentage of assigned cases solved by charges filed by investigative unit
Total unassigned cases
Cases inactivated due to lack of evidence or leads
Collisions per capita
Percentage of traffic complaints worked
Actual to Budget Cost Comparisons for all Dedicated and Shared units (Salary, overtime,
fuel)
Behavioral Health Deputy — Time Saved
Page 23 of 27
Exhibit 3 - Dedicated CITY Officers
Administrative
Police Chief / Undersheriff 1
Assistant Chief / Inspector 1
Sergeant 1
Patrol
Lieutenant 2
Sergeant 9
Deputies 47
K-9 Deputies 3
Traffic
Sergeant 1
Detectives/Corporal 1
Deputies 5
Community Services
Deputyie-s 1
Behavioral Health
Deputy
Homeless Services
Deputy
Domestic Violence
Detective/Corporal
1
School Resource Officer
Deputies 4
Property and Drug Crimes
Sergeant 1
Detectives 10
Deputy 1
Total Dedicated Officers 8-9
1
Page 24 of 27
Exhibit 4 - Combined Number of Officers in Shared Units
Investigations
Captain Undersheriff 1
Lieutenant 1
DEA Deputy 1
Maior Crimes
Sergeant 1
Detectives 6
Sex Crimes
Sergeant
Detectives
1
6 7
Investigative Task Force Spokane County Investigative Unit (SCIU)
Lieutenant 1
Regional Intelligence Group
Detective 1
Joint Terrorism Task Force
Detective 1
Safe Streets ( Drug and Gangs)
Sergeant
Detectives
Deputies
1
4 3
1
Emergency Operations Team
Deputy 2
Command Staff
Undersheriff
Public Information Officer
Sergeant Corporal
1
Professional Standards
Lieutenant 1
Training
Lieutenant 1
Sergeant 2 3
Corporal 1
Deputies 2 1
Page 25 of 27
Total Shared Officers 35
Page 26 of 27
Exhibit 5 - CITY Patrol Districts
m"e5 Spokane Valley Police Districts 1-6 -------
Page 27 of 27
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: April 12, 2022 Department Director Approval:
Check all that apply: ❑ consent
❑ information
❑ old business
® admin. report
❑ public hearing
❑ new business
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Third -party publications in City Building Public Areas
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: First Amendment of United State Constitution; Article I, Section Five
of Washington State Constitution; RCW 42.17A.555; Spokane Valley City Council Governance Manual.
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: None.
BACKGROUND: Over time, third -party publications have appeared, without invitation by the City, in
the lobbies of several City buildings such as City Hall, CenterPlace, and the Precinct. These lobbies are
nonpublic forums because they do not have a tradition or designation by the City as a place of public
communication. Instead, these areas are open to the public to perform limited City business. Because these
areas are nonpublic forums, the City may restrict the distribution of third -party publications so long as the
restrictions are reasonable given the purpose of the location, viewpoint neutral, and uniformly applied.
Restricting the distribution of third -party publications in City building lobbies would be reasonable for three
reasons. First, the City can preserve its property for the use to which it was lawfully dedicated. The purpose
of City -owned building lobbies is to conduct certain City business, such as processing permits or filing
police reports. The City can likely restrict the distribution of materials that do not align with the purpose
of the building. Second, the City can restrict the distribution of materials if it creates clutter. Acquiescing
to some third -party publications displayed in the lobbies of City buildings could result in others amassing
in these areas and could become unsightly. Third, the City is bound by RCW 42.17A.555, which prohibits
the use of public facilities to support or oppose ballot propositions. The City's Governance Manual has
provisions to comply with this statute. From time to time, many third -party publications found in the
lobbies will have information regarding ballot issues. Displaying publications that have election -related
material in them could be construed as using public facilities to support or oppose ballot measures in
violation of the Governance Manual and state law.
Any restriction is required by law to be viewpoint neutral so that it treats all third -party publications the
same. Publications include circulars, pamphlets, newspapers, brochures, and anything else that
communicates ideas. To ensure the restriction remains viewpoint neutral and is objectively applied, any
restriction should apply to all third -party newspapers, newsletters, periodicals, or other publications not
produced by the City for the public's information. City -produced publications would not be subject to this
rule because that production is specifically related to the purpose of the City building.
OPTIONS: (1) Determine whether to prohibit all third -party publications from being distributed in areas
of City buildings that are nonpublic forums; or (2) take other action as appropriate.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: As determined by Council as to whether to place on a
future agenda for motion consideration or do nothing.
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: N/A
STAFF CONTACT: Cary Driskell, City Attorney.
ATTACHMENTS:
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: April 12, 2022 Department Director Approval:
Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ® admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Admin. Report — Balfour Park Improvements — Phase 1 Update
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: N/A
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN:
• 08/28/2007 Admin Report; Consensus to move forward with a Feasibility Study for
Balfour Park
• 09/11/2012 Administration Report - Spokane County Library District (SCLD) Interlocal
Agreement
• 09/25/2012 Passed motion to execute SCLD Interlocal Agreement
• 10/29/2013 Passed motion to accept Balfour Park/Library Conceptual plan
• 12/17/2013 Passed motion to approve Resolution 13-013, adopting the Park & Rec
Master Plan 2013 Update
• 11/12/2019 Passed motion to approve Resolution 19-015 adopting the Park & Rec
Master Plan 2019 Update
• 01/26/2021 Administration Report - SCLD Update by Director Patrick Roewe
• 02/09/2021 Passed motion to approve 2021 amendments to the SCLD Interlocal
Agreement for sale of Balfour Park to SCLD
• 07/06/2021 Passed motion to authorize contract with AHBL for Park Design services
• 07/27/2021 Administration Report — SCLD Library Design Update
• 08/17/2021 Administration Report — Balfour Park Design Update
• 08/24/2021 Administration Report — Potential & Pending Projects, with Council
consensus to allocate $2M for the Balfour Park Concept
• 10/26/2021 Administration Report — Balfour Park Design Update
• 12/14/2021 Administration Report — Balfour Park Design and Bid Update
BACKGROUND: The City entered into an Interlocal Agreement with the SCLD in 2012, shortly
after the City purchased 8.4 acres of property from Pring Corporation, in anticipation of SCLD
constructing and operating a new central library facility within Spokane Valley.
The City sold a total of 2.82 acres to SCLD for construction of a new library, which was
anticipated to occur within a five-year period. In 2017, the Interlocal Agreement timeframe for
completion was extended from 2017 to 2022. Through the interlocal, the City committed to
funding the frontage improvements required for the library and some joint site improvements up
to $1.3M. SCLD submitted a bond proposal to the voters in 2013 and 2014, both of which failed
to reach the required 60% approval threshold to pass. In 2021, SCLD identified alternative
funding options without a voted bond. The library project was advertised in January of 2022 and
bids were opened on February 17, 2022.
On July 6, 2021, Council authorized the City Manager to execute a contract with AHBL, Inc.
(AHBL) for design services of the Balfour Park Expansion. The design was to be completed in
two phases. The Phase 1 project consisted of the main park infrastructure including excavation
and grading, water, electric and sewer utilities, some of the park pathways and lighting system,
the easterly parking lot, some landscaping/irrigation, and the new restroom building.
Construction of the Phase 1 project was estimated at $3.1M.
The Phase 2 project was to include the architectural park elements identified in the adopted
Master Plan which consist of an events plaza, signature playground, splash pad, picnic shelter,
sports courts, veterans' memorial, amphitheater, and a walking/interpretive trail.
On August 17, 2021, staff discussed the status and funding of the project with council. The
project budget required an additional $2M to fund construction of the Phase 1 project. Staff also
discussed the library's project and schedule and the opportunity to combine the projects to
obtain more competitive bids for both agencies. It was later determined that the projects would
be separate. Council allocated $2M on August 24, 2021, to fund the Phase 1 project.
The City's anticipated costs and project budget for Phase 1 project is shown below:
Project Costs
Preliminary Engineering $ 470,500
Construction $3,404,523
Total Estimated Costs $3,875,023
Project Budget
City Fund 312 $3,875,023
Total Budget $3,875,023
The design and construction documents for the Phase 1 project were completed and staff
advertised for construction bids on February 18, 2022. Three bids were opened on March 18,
2022. Unfortunately, the bids were substantially over the engineer's estimate and project
budget. The low bid for the base project work was $5.0M and the high bid was $5.7M. Staff
reviewed the bids and discussed with the consultant, as well as with a few contractors. While
the engineer's estimate from the consultant for Phase 1 was low, there were some
unprecedented circumstances that contributed to the bid increase situation as follows:
• Substantial inflation, locally and across the nation.
• Construction cost increases of more than 20%.
• Contractor availability and labor shortages, locally and across the nation are significantly
impacting costs.
• Timing of the project bid.
Staff is having meetings internally and with the Consultant to:
• Continue project bidding investigations;
• Review the Balfour Master Plan to look for cost savings and streamline the project; and,
• Develop options for Council to consider in moving the project forward.
Staff will have further discussions with Council once these items are solidified.
OPTIONS: Discussion
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Discussion
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Presently, money earmarked for Balfour Park in Capital
Reserve Fund #312 is approximately $3.875M. Additional funding of $500,000 may be available
for the project as shared improvements through the Library District MOU.
STAFF CONTACT: Bill Helbig, City Engineer
ATTACHMENTS: PowerPoint presentation
il'I Helbig - Community & Public Works Director
Balfour Park Project Status
Spokane
jUalley
2
City Constructed Frontage
Improvements in 2021:
Pavement Widening
Curb and Gutter
Utility Relocation
Utility Stubs for Library and
Park
Phase 1 Construction Plans
Excavation & Grading
Utilities
Pathways & Lighting
Eastern Parking Lot
Restroom/Security Building
Balfour Park Project Status
Spokane
jUalley
3
Construction Contract Bids:
Bids Opened March 18th
3 Responsive,
Responsible Bidders
Construction Estimate
$3,111,716
Construction Bid Range
$5,062,545 to $5,700,570
Bid Evaluations:
General Contractor Workload
Subcontractor Availability
Construction Materials — 20%+
Consumer Price Index — 7.9%
Project Timing
Balfour Park Project —Next Steps
■ Continue Project Bidding Investigation
Contractor Contacts
Monitor Bidding Environment
Review Project Master Plan
Value Engineer Park Elements
Revise Project Phasing
Develop Options for Moving Forward
Further Council Discussions
Spokane
jValley
4
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: April 12, 2022 Department Director Approval:
Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ® admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Admin Report: Potential Grant Opportunity - Washington Recreation
Conservation Office (RCO)
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: N/A.
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN:
• April 25, 2006, Resolution 06-009 authorizing an application for funding assistance from
the Washington Wildlife and Recreation Program (WWRP) for the acquisition of
approximately 8 acres of vacant land for Greenacres Park.
• July 24, 2007, Motion authorizing the acquisition of Greenacres Park.
• May 11, 2010, Resolution authorizing an application for funding assistance from WWRP
for the Phase 1 Development of Greenacres Park.
• September 28, 2010, Resolution 10-016 Committing to the expenditure of local funding
for Phase 1 Construction of Greenacres Park contingent upon availability of State
matching funds.
• November 12, 2019, Resolution 19-015 adopting 2019 Spokane Valley Parks and
Recreation Master Plan Update.
BACKGROUND: Washington State Recreation & Conservation Office (RCO) grant programs
operate on a two-year cycle with current funding opportunities now open for applications.
Successful applicants are awarded funding in the subsequent year and generally provide a two-
year timeline for project completion.
On March 15, 2022, staff provided an overview of two RCO grant programs that could be used
for Balfour Park Phase 2 construction, including grant limits, local match requirements,
application deadlines, and funding award timelines.
The City opened Balfour Park Phase 1 construction bids on Friday, March 18t". Due to the bids
coming in substantially over the engineer's estimate, the scope and schedule for Phase 1
construction of Balfour Park is now being reviewed for future action. Because of this, the timing
is no longer ideal for applying for RCO funding for a Balfour Park Phase 2 project during the
current RCO funding cycle.
As an alternative, staff is now seeking Council consensus that staff submit a funding application
for Phase 2 of Greenacres Park. The property for Greenacres Park was acquired in 2007 with
acquisition funding assistance from the RCO. Subsequently a public process guided the
development of a Master Plan for Greenacres Park which was presented to City Council in a
study session on June 1, 2010. The City constructed Phase 1 of the Greenacres Park Master
Plan in 2011-2012 with partial funding assistance from the State of Washington. Phase 2
elements identified in the Greenacres Park Master Plan which have not yet been constructed,
include a tennis court, basketball court, baseball field, skate park, community garden, and
passive and active open space. Additionally, a life -estate that remained on an adjoining parcel
that was acquired by the City for future park purposes has since been vacated and the adjoining
property is now also available for park development.
The Washington Wildlife and Recreation Program (WWRP) Local Parks category and Land and
Water Conservation Fund (LWCF) grant programs are both well -aligned for funding assistance
at Greenacres Park. Per Council consensus, staff will return with a preliminary project scope
and cost estimate, and a request for application approvals via proposed Resolution, on April 26,
2022.
OPTIONS: (1) Authorize staff to pursue the two above -mentioned RCO grants during the
current 2022 application window; or (2) take other action as appropriate
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Council discretion.
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Depending on project budget, the City has the potential to
request up to $2.5M in Greenacres Park Phase 2 development funding through the RCO with at
least $1.5M in local matching funds. Staff will provide a recommendation on a proposed scope
of work if Council is interested in moving this application forward.
STAFF CONTACT: John Bottelli, Parks, Recreation & Facilities Director
ATTACHMENTS: (1) 2010 Greenacres Park Master Plan and (2) Greenacres Park Phases
Greenacres Neighborhood Park
Legend
■ 8.3 Acres
Potential Improvements:
1. Parking Lot
2. Playground
■ 7-12 Play area
■ Tot play area
■ Water Play / Splash Pad
■ Swings with tot swing
3. 15'x15' shelter with picnic tables
4. Restrooms
5. Community Garden
6. Tennis Court
7. Basketball Court
8. Informal Amphitheater
9. 40'x60' Shelter and Stage
10. Baseball Field
11. Multi -Use Play Field (300'x165')
12. Walking Path (Street Frontage)
13. Skate park
14. Passive and Active Open Space
15. Potential Disc Golf (Nine Holes)
FUTURE GREENACRES NEIGHBORHOOD PARK
MASTER PLAN
Spokane
jUalley
Michael Terrell • Landscape
Lane,
9z 91
Greenacres Neighborhood Park
Phase I Improvements
Legend
1. Parking Lot
2. Playground
3. Restrooms
4. Informal Amphitheater
5. 40'x60' Shelter and Stage
6. Multi -Use Play Field (300'x165')
7. Walking Path (Street Frontage)
8. Passive Open Space
GREENACRES NEIGHBORHOOD PARK
MASTER PLAN —Phase I
F+rr
Spokan��
jUalley
Michael Terrell • Landscape Architect
Liberty Lake, WA 99019
Greenacres Neighborhood Park
Phase II Improvements
Legend
■ 8.3 Acres
Potential Improvements:
4arking Lot
2. Playground
• 7-12 Play area
• Tot play area
• Water Play / Splash Pad
• Swings with tot swing
3. 15'x15' shelter with picnic tables
4. Restrooms
5. Community Garden
6. Tennis Court
7. Basketball Court
8. Informal Amphithe“.er
3. 20'x30' Shelter and Stage
10. Baseball Field
11. Open Play Field (300'x165') (1)
12. Walking Path (Perimeter)
13. Skate park
14. Passive and Active Open Space
15. Potential Disc Golf (Nine Holes)
2
■fir
'BOONE AVENUE
FUTURE GREENACRES NEIGHBORHOOD PARK
CONCEPTUAL PLAN —Phase II
Michael Terrell • Landscape Architect
Liberty Lake, WA 99019
Greenacres Neighborhood Park
Legend
•8.3 Acres
Potential Improvements:
1. Parking Lot
2. Playground
• 7-12 Play area
• Tot play area
• Water Play / Splash Pad
• Swings with tot swing
3. 15'x15' shelter with picnic tables
4. Restrooms
5. Community Garden
6. Tennis Court
7. Basketball Court
8. Informal Amphitheater
9. 20'x30' Shelter and Stage
10. Baseball Field
11. Open Play Field (300'x165')
12. Walking Path
13. Skate park
14. Passive and Active Open Space
15. Potential Disc Golf (Nine Holes)
Water
Fountain
Pavilion/ ••. -
shelter'y....... •••
.
Power ....y.................
Water
Water
Fountain/
Sink
_�._..- OONE AVENUE
Water
} Fountain
Spray Pad
ation Bak
bistrict?'`
Meter?
Restroom
Men's / Women's
Meter location
Sewer
Watery Fountain
Parking Lot
20 spaces shown
Expand to 30 spaces
Parking lot lighting—Avista
4 Fixtures?
FUTURE GREENACRES NEIGHBORHOOD PARK
CONCEPTUAL PLAN
Spokan
j% lley
Michael Terrell • Landscape Architect
Liberty Lake, WA 99019
Greenacres Park
Project
There's a New Park in Town/
Phase 1 construction of a new 8-acre park in Greenacres at the
intersection of Long and Boone was completed in 2012.
This long awaited park will be built in two phases.
Phase 2 will be completed in the future, once there is funding.
The City of Spokane Valley Parks and Recreation Department
would like to thank the Greenacres Neighborhood and
Community for all of their hard work, passion, and dedication
that helped make this vision a reality.
Phase 1 Construction
1. Parking Lot
2. Playground Area
3. 15'x15' Shelter w/PicnicTables
4. Restrooms
8. Informal Amphitheatre
9. 40' x 60' Shelter and Stage
11. 300'x165' Multi -Use Field
12. Walking Paths
14. Passive Open Space
15. Disc Golf (Nine Holes)
Phase 2 Constniction
5. Community Garden
6. Tennis Court
7. Basketball Court
10. Baseball Field
13. Skate Park
14. Passive & Active Open Space
oone
www.spokanevalley.org
To:
From:
Re:
DRAFT
ADVANCE AGENDA
as of April 7, 2022; 11:30 a.m.
Please note this is a work in progress; items are tentative
Council & Staff
City Clerk, by direction of City Manager
Draft Schedule for Upcoming Council Meetings
April 19, 2022, Study Session, 6:00 p.m.
ACTION ITEM:
1. Motion Consideration: Buckeye Sewer Bid Award - Gloria Mantz
NON -ACTION ITEMS:
2. Avista Stadium Update - John Hohman, Spokane Indians President Chris Duff
3. City Hall Update - Bill Helbig, Shane McFetteridge
4. Fire Dept Response Statistics - Fire Chief Soto
5. Mission and Park Street Vacation - Chaz Bates
6. Pavement Preservation Program - Bill Helbig, Adam Jackson
7. ARPA Discussion - Erik Lamb, Chelsie Taylor
8. Advance Agenda - Mayor Haley
[due Tue April 12]
(10 minutes)
(10 minutes)
(15 minutes)
(15 minutes)
(5 minutes)
(15 minutes)
(15 minutes)
(5 minutes)
9. Executive Session: [RCW 42.30.110(1)(g)J Review Performance ofa Public Employee [*estimated meeting: 90 mins]
April 26, 2022, Formal Meeting, 6:00 p.m. [due Tue April 19]
Proclamation: Arbor Day
1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes, Resolution 22-004 setting St. vacation hearing for PC)
2. Resolution 22-005 Thanking Legislators - John Hohman
3. Resolution 22-006 Third Party Publications in City Building Public Areas - Cary Driskell
4. Admin Report: Legislative Session Update - John Hohman, Briahna Murray
5. Admin Report: Law Enforcement Interlocal Agreement - Erik Lamb, Chief Ellis, Morgan Koudelka
6. Admin Report: Advance Agenda - Mayor Haley
7. Info Only: Department Monthly Reports [*estimated meeting:
May 3, 2022, Study Session, 6:00 p.m.
1. 2022 Budget Amendment - Chelsie Taylor
2. Parking on Private Property - Jenny Nickerson
3. Comprehensive Plan Amendments - Chaz Bates
4. Mirabeau Vacant Parcel - John Bottelli
5. CenterPlace Operations- John Bottelli, Chelsie Taylor
6. Accomplishments Report - John Hohman
7. Advance Agenda - Mayor Haley
(5 minutes)
(10 minutes)
(15 minutes)
(30 minutes)
(45 minutes)
(5 minutes)
110 mins]
[due Tue April 26]
(10 minutes)
(20 minutes)
(10 minutes)
(10 minutes)
(15 minutes)
(10 minutes)
(5 minutes)
[*estimated meeting: 80 mins]
May 10, 2022, Formal Meeting, 6:00 p.m.
Proclamation: Older Americans Month
1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes)
2. First Reading Ordinance 22- Comprehensive Plan Amendments - Chaz Bates
3. First Reading Ordinance 22- Comprehensive Plan Zoning Map - Chaz Bates
4. Admin Report: Senior Center Agreement - John Bottelli
5. Admin Report: Advance Agenda - Mayor Haley
May 17, 2022, Study Session, 6:00 p.m.
Proclamation: Lemonade Day
ACTION ITEMS:
1. PUBLIC HEARING: 2022 Budget Amendment - Chelsie Taylor
2. First Reading Ordinance 22- Amending 2022 Budget - Chelsie Taylor
NON -ACTION ITEMS:
3. Advance Agenda - Mayor Haley
[due Tue May 3]
(5 minutes)
(10 minutes)
(10 minutes)
(10 minutes)
(5 minutes)
[*estimated meeting: 40 mins]
[due Tue May 10]
(15 minutes)
(10 minutes)
(5 minutes)
[*estimated meeting: 30 mins]
Draft Advance Agenda 4/7/2022 2:27:34 PM
Page 1 of 2
May 24, 2022, Formal Meeting, 6:00 p.m.
1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes)
2. Second Reading Ordinance 22- Comprehensive Plan Amendments — Chaz Bates
3. Second Reading Ordinance 22- Comprehensive Plan Zoning Map — Chaz Bates
4. Admin Report: Advance Agenda — Mayor Haley
5. Info Only: Department Monthly Reports
May 31, 2022, Study Session, 6:00 p.m.
ACTION ITEMS:
1. Second Reading Ordinance 22- Amending 2022 Budget — Chelsie Taylor
NON -ACTION ITEMS:
2. Advance Agenda — Mayor Haley
June 7, 2022, Study Session, 6:00 p.m.
1. 6-year TIP — Adam Jackson
2. Advance Agenda — Mayor Haley
June 14, 2022, Special Meeting: Budget Workshop 8:30 a.m.
June 14, 2022, Formal Meeting, 6:00 p. m. — Meeting Cancelled
June 21, 2022, Study Session, 6:00 p.m.
1. Advance Agenda — Mayor Haley
June 28, 2022, Formal Meeting, 6:00 p.m.
1. PUBLIC HEARING: 6-year TIP — Adam Jackson
2. Resolution 22 Adopting TIP — Adam Jackson
3. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes)
4. Admin Report: Advance Agenda — Mayor Haley
5. Info Only: Department Monthly Reports
July 5, 2022, Study Session, 6:00 p.m.
Proclamation: Parks and Recreation Month
1. Advance Agenda — Mayor Haley
July 12, 2022, Formal Meeting, 6:00 p.m.
1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes)
2. Admin Report: Advance Agenda — Mayor Haley
July 19, 2022, Study Session, 6:00 p.m.
1. Council Goals & Priorities for Use of Lodging Tax — Chelsie Taylor
2. Advance Agenda — Mayor Haley
July 26, 2022, Formal Meeting, 6:00 p.m.
Proclamation: National Night Out
1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes)
2. Admin Report: Advance Agenda — Mayor Haley
3. Info Only: Department Monthly Reports
*time for public or Council comments not included
OTHER PENDING AND/OR UPCOMING
Appleway Trail Amenities
Artwork & Metal Boxes
Basement space
CDBG Interlocal
Consolidated Homeless Grant
Continuum of Care (info item?)
Core Beliefs Resolution
Gov. Auth. Emergencies (info)
Greenacres Park
ISSUES/MEETINGS:
Master Speed Limit Schedule
Mirabeau Park Forestry Mgmt.
Neighborhood Restoration
Park Lighting
PFD Presentation
Prosecutor Services
Residency
St. Illumination (owners, cost,
location)
[due Tue May 17]
(5 minutes)
(5 minutes)
(5 minutes)
(5 minutes)
[*estimated meeting: 20 mins]
[due Tue May 24]
(10 minutes)
(5 minutes)
[due Tue May 31]
(10 minutes)
(5 minutes)
[due Tue June 7]
[due Tue June 14]
(5 minutes)
[due Tue June 21]
(5 minutes)
(10 minutes)
(5 minutes)
(5 minutes)
[*estimated meeting: 25 mins]
[due Tue June 28]
(5 minutes)
[due Tue July 5]
(5 minutes)
(5 minutes)
[due Tue July 12]
(10 minutes)
(5 minutes)
[due Tue July 19]
(5 minutes)
(5 minutes)
[*estimated meeting: mins]
St. O&M Pavement Preservation
Vehicle Wgt Infrastructure Impact
Water Districts & Green Space
Way Finding Signs
Draft Advance Agenda 4/7/2022 2:27:34 PM
Page 2 of 2