Loading...
2022, 05-03 Study Session meeting AGENDA SPOKANE VALLEY CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING STUDY SESSION Tuesday,May 3,2022 6:00 p.m. Remotely via ZOOM Meeting and In Person at 10210 E Sprague Avenue Council Requests Please Silence Your Cell Phones During Council Meeting NOTE:In response to Governor Inslee's announcement reopening Washington under the"Washington Ready"plan,members of the public may attend Spokane Valley Council meetings in-person at City Hall at the address provided above,or via Zoom at the link below. Members of the public will be allowed to comment in-person or via Zoom as described below. Public comments will only be accepted for those items noted on the agenda as "public comment opportunity." If wishing to make a comment via Zoom,comments must be received by 4:00 pm the day of the meeting. Otherwise,comments will be taken in-person at the meeting in Council Chambers, as noted on the agenda below. • Sign up to Provide Oral Public Comment at the Meeting via Calling-In • Submit Written Public Comment Prior to the Meeting • Join the Zoom WEB Meeting CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL APPROVAL OF AGENDA PROCLAMATIONS:Recognizing Child Care Providers; Older Americans'Month ACTION ITEMS: 1.Motion Consideration: Stormwater Comp Plan and Rate Study Consultant Services Agreement—Bill Helbig [public comment opportunity] 2.Motion Consideration:2020 Pedestrian and Bicycle Program Grant Award—Adam Jackson [public comment opportunity] NON-ACTION ITEMS: DISCUSSION LEADER SUBJECT/ACTIVITY GOAL 3. Bill Helbig, Shane McFetridge City Hall Update Discussion/Information 4. Chelsie Taylor 2022 Budget Amendment Discussion/Information 5.Adam Jackson Potential Grant Opportunities: Safe Routes Discussion/Information To School; and 2022 Pedestrian Bicycle Program 6. Bill Helbig,Erik Lamb Parking on Private Property Discussion/Information 7. Chaz Bates Comprehensive Plan Amendments Discussion/Information 8. Erik Lamb,Chief Ellis, Law Enforcement Interlocal Agreement Discussion/Information Morgan Koudelka 9. Mayor Haley Advance Agenda Discussion/Information 10.Information Only: Community& Public Works Monthly Report 11. Mayor Haley Council Comments Discussion/Information 12. John Hohman City Manager Comments Discussion/Information ADJOURN Council Agenda May 3,2022 Page 1 of 1 Spokane Valley MCLANATION CITY OFS VALLEY cognizing Chits(Care Traviders WHEREAS, Nationwide, Cities, counties and organizations will recognize Child Care Providers on this day; and WHEREAS, It is estimated that nationwide, over half the children under the age of six spend some time in a nonparental care arrangement on a weekly basis, which care provides critical enrichment opportunities and nurtures development for children of all backgrounds, which is a vital building block of our state economy; and WHEREAS, The COVID-19 pandemic continues to create tremendous hardship for childcare providers and the families of Washington, with providers risking their health and financial stability to remain open throughout shifting COVID-19 health guidance; and WHEREAS, Childcare providers continue to provide essential high-quality early learning experience to Washington's children in the face of irregular and long hours, high turnover rates in child care businesses, and increasing stressful working conditions due to the impact of COVID-19, burnout, and other workforce-related complications; and WHEREAS, Our future depends on the quality of the early childhood experiences provided to young children today; and support for high-quality child care represents a worthy commitment to our children'future. NOW, THEREFORE, I, Pam Haley, Mayor of the City of Spokane Valley, on behalf of the Spokane Valley City Council and the citizens of the City of Spokane Valley, do hereby proclaim May 6, 2022 as Provider Appreciation Day In the City of Spokane Valley, and I urge all citizens to recognize Child Care providers for their important work. Dated this 3rd day of May, 2022. Pam Haley, Mayor S pokane Valley rott rm rtion. City of Spo4ne rairey, Washington O(er)4mericans'3/fond 'Age My Way' WHEREAS, Spokane Valley includes a growing number of older citizens who contribute their strength, wisdom, and experience to our community; and WHEREAS, Communities benefit when people of all ages, abilities and backgrounds are welcomed, included, and supported; and WHEREAS, Spokane Valley recognizes the benefits of having a community that provides the services and supports older Americans' need to thrive and live independently for as long as possible; and WHEREAS, Spokane Valley appreciates the needs and preferences of Older Americans and supports older American's desire to age in place and thereby aid in reinforcing their strength and independence. Now therefore, I, Pam Haley, Mayor of the City of Spokane Valley, Washington, on behalf of the Spokane Valley City Council and the citizens of the City of Spokane Valley, do hereby proclaim May 2022 as Older Americans'Month And I urge residents to recognize the contributions of our older citizens, and join in efforts to support older American's choices about how they age in their communities. Dated this 3rd day of May, 2022. Pam Haley, Mayor CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: May 3, 2022 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ® new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Motion Consideration: Stormwater Comprehensive Plan and Rate Study Consultant Contract. GOVERNING LEGISLATION: SVMC 3.80 Storm and Surface Water Utility; SVMC 3.35.10 — Contract Authority PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: • Adoption of current stormwater utility fee at incorporation of the City in 2003 • April 26, 2022 —Administrative report, Stormwater Comprehensive Plan and Rate Study BACKGROUND: The City Stormwater Utility manages its stormwater program pursuant to the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) Chapter 22.150 — Stormwater Management Regulations, the Spokane Regional Stormwater Manual (SRSM), requirements set forth under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Phase II Municipal Stormwater (MS4) Permit, and the Washington Department of Ecology Underground Injection Control (UIC) Program. The Stormwater Utility is funded through the collection of a Storm and Surface Utility (Utility) fees from developed parcels located within the City, and the Spokane County Aquifer Protection Area (APA) fee. The Utility fee of $21 per year is assessed uniformly on single family residences, duplexes, triplexes and fourplexes. All other developed property is charged $21 for every 3,160 square feet of measured impervious surface area. The current stormwater rate is expected to generate about $1.9 million in 2022 to City Fund 402. The Utility fee was established when the City incorporated, is included in the adopted Master Fee Schedule and has not increased since 2003. The APA fee is imposed on each water meter within the City by water meter size. The APA funds are collected by Spokane County, county-wide and distributed proportionately to local jurisdictions. APA funds must be "expended entirely on stormwater related projects that are designed to protect the aquifer." This fee will sunset in November of 2024 without a regional public vote. This fee is expected to generate over $450,000 in 2022 to City Fund 403. The City needs to develop a stormwater comprehensive plan to establish the long term goals of the Utility, identify solutions to address flooding and water quality issues, identify strategies necessary to ensure compliance with the MS4 permit and UIC programs, and develop a sustainable financial plan for the utility. The comprehensive stormwater plan will guide a Stormwater Utility Rate Study and recommendations for potential stormwater utility rate structures and fees. The goal is to present the recommendations of the rate study and proposed rate revisions to Council by August 2022 for Council adoption and implementation for 2023. On January 5, 2022, the City issued a Request for Qualifications to develop a stormwater comprehensive plan and rate study. Osborn Consulting, Inc. was selected as the most qualified firm to provide these services. The proposed scope of work is included as an attachment to the Agreement for Professional Services. OPTIONS: 1) Authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement with Osborn Consulting, or 2) take other appropriate action. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to authorize the City Manager to finalize and execute an Agreement for Professional Services with Osborn Consulting, Inc. in an amount not to exceed $282,612.00 for the Stormwater Comprehensive Plan and Rate Study. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Fund 402 will be utilized to pay for the stormwater comprehensive plan and rate study. There are sufficient funds available to complete the work. STAFF CONTACT: Bill Helbig, PE — Community & Public Works Director ATTACHMENTS: Agreement for Professional Services Contract No. 22-083 AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Osborn Consulting,Inc. THIS AGREEMENT is made by and between the City of Spokane Valley, a code City of the State of Washington,hereinafter"City"and Osborn Consulting,Inc,hereinafter"Consultant,"jointly referred to as "Parties." IN CONSIDERATION of the terms and conditions contained herein,the Parties agree as follows: 1. Work to Be Performed. Consultant shall provide all labor, services, and material to satisfactorily complete the Scope of Services, attached as Exhibit A. A. Administration. The City Manager or designee shall administer and be the primary contact for Consultant. Prior to commencement of work, Consultant shall contact the City Manager or designee to review the Scope of Services,schedule,and date of completion. Upon notice from the City Manager or designee, Consultant shall commence work, perform the requested tasks in the Scope of Services,stop work,and promptly cure any failure in performance under this Agreement. B. Representations. City has relied upon the qualifications of Consultant in entering into this Agreement. By execution of this Agreement, Consultant represents it possesses the ability, skill, and resources necessary to perform the work and is familiar with all current laws, rules, and regulations which reasonably relate to the Scope of Services. No substitutions of agreed-upon personnel shall be made without the prior written consent of City. Consultant represents that the compensation as stated in paragraph 3 is adequate and sufficient for the timely provision of all professional services required to complete the Scope of Services under this Agreement. Consultant shall be responsible for the technical accuracy of its services and documents resulting therefrom, and City shall not be responsible for discovering deficiencies therein. Consultant shall correct such deficiencies without additional compensation except to the extent such action is directly attributable to deficiencies in City-furnished information. C. Standard of Care. Consultant shall exercise the degree of skill and diligence normally employed by professional consultants engaged in the same profession, and performing the same or similar services at the time such services are performed. D. Modifications. City may modify this Agreement and order changes in the work whenever necessary or advisable. Consultant shall accept modifications when ordered in writing by the City Manager or designee, so long as the additional work is within the scope of Consultant's area of practice. Compensation for such modifications or changes shall be as mutually agreed between the Parties. Consultant shall make such revisions in the work as are necessary to correct errors or omissions appearing therein when required to do so by City without additional compensation. 2. Term of Contract. This Agreement shall be in full force and effect upon execution and shall remain in effect until completion of all contractual requirements have been met as determined by City. Consultant shall complete its work by December 31, 2022,unless the time for performance is extended in writing by Agreement for Professional Services(with professional liability coverage) Page 1 of 8 Contract No. 22-083 the Parties. Either Party may terminate this Agreement for material breach after providing the other Party with at least 10 days'prior notice and an opportunity to cure the breach. City may,in addition,terminate this Agreement for any reason by 10 days' written notice to Consultant. In the event of termination without breach, City shall pay Consultant for all work previously authorized and satisfactorily performed prior to the termination date. 3. Compensation. City agrees to pay Consultant a flat fee of$282,612.00 (which includes Washington State Sales Tax if any is applicable) as full compensation for everything done under this Agreement,as set forth in Exhibit B. Consultant shall not perform any extra, further, or additional services for which it will request additional compensation from City without a prior written agreement for such services and payment there fore. 4. Payment. Consultant shall be paid monthly upon presentation of an invoice to City. Applications for payment shall be sent to the City Finance Department at the below-stated address. City reserves the right to withhold payment under this Agreement for that portion of the work(if any)which is determined in the reasonable judgment of the City Manager or designee to be noncompliant with the Scope of Services, City standards, City Code,and federal or state standards. 5. Notice. Notices other than applications for payment shall be given in writing as follows: TO THE CITY: TO THE CONSULTANT: Name: Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Name: Kaela Mansfield Phone: (509) 720-5000 Phone: (509) 867-3654 Address: 10210 East Sprague Avenue Address: 101 S. Stevens, Suite 103 Spokane Valley,WA 99206 Spokane,WA 99201 6. Applicable Laws and Standards. The Parties,in the performance of this Agreement, agree to comply with all applicable federal, state, and local laws and regulations. Consultant states that its designs, construction documents, and services shall conform to all federal, state,and local statutes and regulations. 7. Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, and Other Responsibility Matters — Primary Covered Transactions. A. By executing this Agreement, the Consultant certifies to the best of its knowledge and belief that it and its principals: 1. Are not presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible,or voluntarily excluded from covered transactions by any federal department or agency; 2. Have not within a three-year period preceding this proposal been convicted of or had a civil judgment rendered against them for commission of fraud or a criminal offense in connection with obtaining, attempting to obtain, or performing a public (federal, state, or local) transaction or contract under a public transaction; violation of federal or state antitrust statutes or commission of embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records,making false statements,or receiving stolen property; Agreement for Professional Services(with professional liability coverage) Page 2 of 8 Contract No. 22-083 3. Are not presently indicted for or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a governmental entity (federal, state, or local) with commission of any of the offenses enumerated in paragraph(A)(2) of this certification; and 4. Have not within a three-year period preceding this application/proposal had one or more public transactions(federal, state,or local)terminated for cause or default. B. Where the prospective primary participant is unable to certify to any of the statements in this certification,such prospective participant shall attach an explanation to this Agreement. 8. Relationship of the Parties. It is understood and agreed that Consultant shall be an independent contractor and not the agent or employee of City, that City is interested in only the results to be achieved, and that the right to control the particular manner,method, and means in which the services are performed is solely within the discretion of Consultant. Any and all employees who provide services to City under this Agreement shall be deemed employees solely of Consultant. The Consultant shall be solely responsible for the conduct and actions of all its employees under this Agreement and any liability that may attach thereto. 9. Ownership of Documents. All drawings, plans, specifications, and other related documents prepared by Consultant under this Agreement are and shall be the property of City,and may be subject to disclosure pursuant to chapter 42.56 RCW or other applicable public record laws. The written, graphic, mapped, photographic, or visual documents prepared by Consultant under this Agreement shall, unless otherwise provided, be deemed the property of City. City shall be permitted to retain these documents, including reproducible camera-ready originals of reports,reproduction quality mylars of maps,and copies in the form of computer files, for the City's use. City shall have unrestricted authority to publish, disclose,distribute, and otherwise use,in whole or in part,any reports,data,drawings,images,or other material prepared under this Agreement,provided that Consultant shall have no liability for the use of Consultant's work product outside of the scope of its intended purpose. 10.Records. The City or State Auditor or any of their representatives shall have full access to and the right to examine during normal business hours all of Consultant's records with respect to all matters covered in this Agreement. Such representatives shall be permitted to audit, examine, make excerpts or transcripts from such records, and to make audits of all contracts, invoices,materials,payrolls, and record of matters covered by this Agreement for a period of three years from the date final payment is made hereunder. 11.Insurance. Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of the Agreement,insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damage to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by Consultant,its agents,representatives,employees,or subcontractors. A. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Consultant's required insurance shall be of the types and coverages as stated below: 1. Automobile liability insurance covering all owned, non-owned, hired, and leased vehicles. Coverage shall be at least as broad as Insurance Services Office (ISO) form CA 00 01. 2. Commercial general liability insurance shall be at least as broad as ISO occurrence form Agreement for Professional Services(with professional liability coverage) Page 3 of 8 Contract No. 22-083 CG 00 01 and shall cover liability arising from premises,operations, stop-gap independent contractors and personal injury, and advertising injury. City shall be named as an additional insured under Consultant's commercial general liability insurance policy with respect to the work performed for the City using an additional insured endorsement at least as broad as ISO CG 20 26. 3. Workers' compensation coverage as required by the industrial insurance laws of the State of Washington. 4. Professional liability insurance appropriate to Consultant's profession. B.Minimum Amounts of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain the following insurance limits: 1. Automobile liability insurance with a minimum combined single limit for bodily injury and property damage of$1,000,000 per accident. 2. Commercial general liability insurance shall be written with limits no less than $2,000,000 each occurrence, and $2,000,000 general aggregate. 3. Professional liability insurance shall be written with limits no less than $2,000,000 per claim and$2,000,000 policy aggregate limit. C. Other Insurance Provisions. The Consultant's policies are to contain,or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions for automobile liability and commercial general liability insurance: 1. Consultant's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance with respect to the City. Any insurance, self-insurance, or self-insured pool coverage maintained by City shall be in excess of Consultant's insurance and shall not contribute with it. 2. Consultant shall provide City and all additional insured for this work with written notice of any policy cancellation within two business days of their receipt of such notice. 3. If Consultant maintains higher insurance limits than the minimums shown above, City shall be insured for the full available limits of commercial general and excess or umbrella liability maintained by Consultant, irrespective of whether such limits maintained by Consultant are greater than those required by this Agreement or whether any certificate of insurance furnished to the City evidences limits of liability lower than those maintained by Consultant. 4. Failure on the part of Consultant to maintain the insurance as required shall constitute a material breach of the Agreement, upon which the City may, after giving at least five business days' notice to Consultant to correct the breach, immediately terminate the Agreement, or at its sole discretion,procure or renew such insurance and pay any and all premiums in connection therewith, with any sums so expended to be repaid to City on demand, or at the sole discretion of the City,offset against funds due Consultant from the City. D.Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M.Best rating Agreement for Professional Services(with professional liability coverage) Page 4 of 8 Contract No. 22-083 of not less than A:VII. E. Evidence of Coverage. As evidence of the insurance coverages required by this Agreement, Consultant shall furnish the City with original certificates and a copy of the amendatory endorsements, including but not necessarily limited to the additional insured endorsement, evidencing the insurance requirements of the Agreement before commencement of the work. 12. Indemnification and Hold Harmless. Consultant shall, at its sole expense, defend, indemnify, and hold harmless City and its officers,agents,and employees, from any and all claims,actions, suits,liability, loss, costs, attorney's fees, costs of litigation, expenses, injuries, and damages of any nature whatsoever relating to or arising out of the wrongful or negligent acts,errors,or omissions in the services provided by Consultant, Consultant's agents, subcontractors, subconsultants, and employees to the fullest extent permitted by law, subject only to the limitations provided below. However, should a court of competent jurisdiction determine that this Agreement is subject to RCW 4.24.115, then, in the event of liability for damages arising out of bodily injury to persons or damages to property caused by or resulting from the concurrent negligence of the Consultant and the City,its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers, the Consultant's liability, including the duty and cost to defend, hereunder shall be only to the extent of the Consultant's negligence. It is further specifically and expressly understood that the indemnification provided herein constitutes the Consultant's waiver of immunity under Industrial Insurance, Title 51, RCW, solely for the purpose of this indemnification. This waiver has been mutually negotiated by the parties. The provisions of this section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. 13.Waiver. No officer,employee,agent,or other individual acting on behalf of either Party has the power, right,or authority to waive any of the conditions or provisions of this Agreement. A waiver in one instance shall not be held to be a waiver of any other subsequent breach or nonperformance. All remedies afforded in this Agreement or by law shall be taken and construed as cumulative and in addition to every other remedy provided herein or by law. Failure of either Party to enforce at any time any of the provisions of this Agreement or to require at any time performance by the other Party of any provision hereof shall in no way be construed to be a waiver of such provisions nor shall it affect the validity of this Agreement or any part thereof. 14. Assignment and Delegation. Neither Party shall assign, transfer, or delegate any or all of the responsibilities of this Agreement or the benefits received hereunder without prior written consent of the other Party. 15. Subcontracts. Except as otherwise provided herein, Consultant shall not enter into subcontracts for any of the work contemplated under this Agreement without obtaining prior written approval of City. 16. Confidentiality. Consultant may, from time-to-time,receive information which is deemed by City to be confidential. Consultant shall not disclose such information without the prior express written consent of City or upon order of a court of competent jurisdiction. 17. Jurisdiction and Venue. This Agreement is entered into in Spokane County,Washington. Disputes between City and Consultant shall be resolved in the Superior Court of the State of Washington in Spokane County. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Consultant agrees that it may, at City's request, be joined as a party in any arbitration proceeding between City and any third party that includes a claim or claims that Agreement for Professional Services(with professional liability coverage) Page 5 of 8 Contract No. 22-083 arise out of, or that are related to Consultant's services under this Agreement. Consultant further agrees that the Arbitrator(s)' decision therein shall be final and binding on Consultant and that judgment may be entered upon it in any court having jurisdiction thereof. 18. Cost and Attorney's Fees. The prevailing party in any litigation or arbitration arising out of this Agreement shall be entitled to its attorney's fees and costs of such litigation(including expert witness fees). 19. Entire Agreement. This written Agreement constitutes the entire and complete agreement between the Parties and supersedes any prior oral or written agreements. This Agreement may not be changed, modified,or altered except in writing signed by the Parties hereto. 20.Anti-kickback. No officer or employee of City,having the power or duty to perform an official act or action related to this Agreement shall have or acquire any interest in this Agreement, or have solicited, accepted,or granted a present or future gift,favor, service,or other thing of value from any person with an interest in this Agreement. 21. Business Registration. Consultant shall register with the City as a business prior to commencement of work under this Agreement if it has not already done so. 22. Assurance of Compliance with Applicable Federal Law. During the performance of this Agreement, the Consultant, for itself,its assignees, and successors in interest agrees as follows: A. Compliance with Regulations. Consultant shall comply with the federal laws set forth in subsection G, below ("Pertinent Non-Discrimination Authorities") relative to non-discrimination in federally-assisted programs as adopted or amended from time-to-time, which are herein incorporated by reference and made a part of this Agreement. B. Non-discrimination. Consultant,with regard to the work performed by it during this Agreement, shall not discriminate on the grounds of race,color,or national origin in the selection and retention of subcontractors, including procurements of materials and leases of equipment. Consultant shall not participate directly or indirectly in the discrimination prohibited by the Acts and the Regulations, including employment practices when the contract covers any activity, project, or program set forth in Appendix B of 49 CFR Part 21. C. Solicitations for Subcontracts, Including Procurements of Materials and Equipment. In all solicitations, either by competitive bidding, or negotiation made by Consultant for work to be performed under a subcontract,including procurements of materials, or leases of equipment, each potential subcontractor or supplier shall be notified by Consultant of Consultants's obligations under this Agreement and the Acts and the Regulations relative to non-discrimination on the grounds of race,color,or national origin. D. Information and Reports. Consultant shall provide all information and reports required by the Acts, the regulations, and directives issued pursuant thereto, and shall permit access to its books, records, accounts,other sources of information,and its facilities as may be determined by the City or the WSDOT to be pertinent to ascertain compliance with such Acts,regulations,and instructions. Where any information required of Consultant is in the exclusive possession of another who fails or refuses to furnish the information, Consultant shall so certify to the City or the WSDOT, as appropriate, and shall set forth what efforts it has made to obtain the information. Agreement for Professional Services(with professional liability coverage) Page 6 of 8 Contract No. 22-083 E. Sanctions for Noncompliance. In the event of a Consultant's noncompliance with the non- discrimination provisions of this Agreement, the City will impose such contract sanctions as it or the WSDOT may determine to be appropriate,including,but not limited to: 1. Withholding payments to Consultant under the Agreement until Consultant complies; and/or 2. Cancelling,terminating,or suspending the Agreement,in whole or in part. F. Incorporation of Provisions. Consultant shall include the provisions of paragraphs of these Contract Clauses in every subcontract, including procurements of materials and leases of equipment, unless exempt by the Acts, regulations and directives issued pursuant thereto. Consultant shall take action with respect to any subcontract or procurement as the City or the WSDOT may direct as a means of enforcing such provisions, including sanctions for noncompliance. Provided, that if Consultant becomes involved in, or is threatened with litigation by a subcontractor or supplier because of such direction,Consultant may request that the City enter into any litigation to protect the interests of the City. In addition,Consultant may request the United States to enter into the litigation to protect the interests of the United States. G. Pertinent Non-Discrimination Authorities: During the performance of this Agreement, the Consultant agrees to comply with the following non-discrimination statutes and authorities; including but not limited to: Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964(42 U.S.C. §2000d et seq.,78 stat.252),(prohibits discrimination on the basis of race,color,national origin); and 49 CFR Part 21;and 49 Part 26; The Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, (42 U.S.C. §4601), (prohibits unfair treatment of persons displaced or whose property has been acquired because of Federal or Federal-aid programs and projects); Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1973, (23 U.S.C. §324 et seq.), (prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex); Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, (29 U.S.C. §794 et seq.), as amended, (prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability); and 49 CFR Part 27; The Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended, (42 U.S.C. §6101 et seq.), (prohibits discrimination on the basis of age); Airport and Airway Improvement Act of 1982, (49 U.S.C. §471, Section 47123), as amended,(prohibits discrimination based on race,creed,color,national origin,or sex); The Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987, (PL 100-209), (Broadened the scope, coverage and applicability of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, The Age Discrimination Act of 1975 and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973,by expanding the definition of the terms"programs or activities"to include all of the programs or activities of the Federal- Agreement for Professional Services(with professional liability coverage) Page 7 of 8 Contract No. 22-083 aid recipients, sub-recipients and contractors, whether such programs or activities are Federally funded or not); Titles II and III of the Americans with Disabilities Act,which prohibit discrimination on the basis of disability in the operation of public entities, public and private transportation systems,places of public accommodation,and certain testing entities(42 U.S.C. §§12131- 12189)as implemented by Department of Transportation regulations at 49 C.F.R.parts 37 and 38; The Federal Aviation Administration's Non-discrimination statute (49 U.S.C. §47123) (prohibits discrimination on the basis of race,color,national origin, and sex); Executive Order 12898, Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations, which ensures Non-discrimination against minority populations by discouraging programs, policies, and activities with disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental effects on minority and low-income populations; Executive Order 13166, Improving Access to Services for Persons with Limited English Proficiency, and resulting agency guidance, national origin discrimination includes discrimination because of Limited English proficiency (LEP). To ensure compliance with Title VI,you must take reasonable steps to ensure that LEP persons have meaningful access to your programs(70 Fed.Reg. at 74087 to 74100); and Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, as amended, which prohibits you from discriminating because of sex in education programs or activities(20 U.S.C. §1681 et seq.). 23. Severability. If any section,sentence,clause,or phrase of this Agreement should be held to be invalid for any reason by a court of competent jurisdiction,such invalidity shall not affect the validity of any other section, sentence,clause,or phrase of this Agreement. 24. Exhibits. Exhibits attached and incorporated into this Agreement are: A. Scope of Services and Summary of Fees B. Insurance Certificates The Parties have executed this Agreement this day of ,20 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Consultant: John Hohman, City Manager By: Its: Authorized Representative APPROVED AS TO FORM: Office of the City Attorney Agreement for Professional Services(with professional liability coverage) Page 8 of 8 City of Spokane Valley Stormwater Comprehensive Plan and Rate Study Scope of Work Exhibit A SCOPE OF WORK Project: City of Spokane Valley Stormwater Comprehensive Plan and Rate Study PRIME Consultant: Osborn Consulting,Inc. Contract No.: Background The goal of this project is to develop a stormwater comprehensive plan,rate study, and proposed rate revision plan for the City of Spokane Valley(City). The City owns,operates, and maintains a Stormwater Utility which includes infrastructure governed by the Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) Permit as well as the Underground Injection Control(UIC)Program (UIC Rule)governed by Washington Administrative Code (WAC 173-218). The stormwater comprehensive plan developed as part of this project will address new and increased requirements of the MS4 Permit and UIC Rule Guidance,updated projections of future customer and infrastructure growth and development, and adjustment of stormwater rates and rate structure to maintain sustainable funding of the City's Stormwater Utility. Osborn Consulting,Inc. (OCI)has teamed with FCS GROUP(FCS) and Evergreen StormH2O (Evergreen)to complete the work described in this contract. An overview of the tasks associated with the work is provided in Table 1. The City of Spokane Valley stormwater utility has been in place since the City's incorporation in 2003. The impervious-based rate of$21 per year is imposed uniformly on single family residences,duplexes, triplexes, and fourplexes. All other developed property is charged$21 for every 3,160 square feet of measured impervious surface area—the average amount of impervious surface area on single family residences in Spokane Valley. The stormwater rate is expected to generate about$1.9 million in 2022 to fund 402. The stormwater program also receives funding from the Spokane County Aquifer Protection Area fee, imposed on each water meter by meter size. Funds from this source must be "expended entirely on stormwater related projects that are designed to protect the aquifer."This fee will sunset in November of 2024 without a regional public vote. This fee is expected to generate over$450,000 in 2022 to fund 403. The task plan described below would provide a multi-year revenue requirement(financial plan), a cost-of- service analysis, and rate structure options,with supporting outreach and documentation.The goal is to have this rate study and the proposed rate revisions completed in time to present it at required public hearing meetings and obtain City Council approval by August 2022 for Council adoption and implementation for 2023. 11Page City of Spokane Valley Stormwater Comprehensive Plan and Rate Study Scope of Work Table 1: Task Overview Task Team Description of Work Application to Project Goal 100: Project Management& OCI Manage and direct the team in the successful completion of tasks. Administration 200: Data Collection OCI Collect available data Data will inform gap analysis, cost evaluations, and rate updates 300: Data Evaluation, Gap Analysis, and Cost Evaluations 300A: Stormwater Asset Data Review Task 200 data, develop High-level conditions assessment will inform Evaluation and Review OCI stormwater asset inventory and assess stormwater project prioritizations and repair/ drainage areas of concern replacement recommendations for existing systems 300B: Gap Analysis and Review Task 200 data, conduct gap Gap analysis will identify areas for improvement of Level of Service Evaluation OCI analysis existing City practices related to stormwater and level of service goals 300C: Prioritize and Estimate Review Task 200 data, assess costs for Cost evaluations will be used to inform the new Stormwater Improvement OCI future stormwater-related projects and stormwater rates and the prioritization of projects in Project Costs recommend level of service the stormwater comprehensive plan 400: Prepare Rate Study 400A: Determine Revenue FCS Review Task 200 data, identify require- This subtask will inform the rate study/structure, as Requirements ments, assumptions, and rate study goals well as scenarios/levels of service analyzed 400B: Cost of Service FCS Review Tasks 200 and 300 data to inform Level of service goals (from Task 300B)will inform proposed cost and level of service recommended average unit rate costs 400C: Review and Update Review Task 300 deliverable data to Recommended rate increases will be proposed Existing Surface Water FCS inform proposed rate increases considering sustainable funding to meet the City's Management Rates desired level of service, and future projects 400D: Draft Report, Document recommendations and Recommended rate increases will be reviewed with Meetings, and Presentations FCS/OCI findings,with review/comment from City City staff for comment before finalizing 400E: Workshops,Meetings, Public meetings and City Council Public feedback and City Council comments will be and Public Hearings and presentations/workshops will message the incorporated into the increased rates, as appropriate proposed rate increases to those affected 500: Develop Stormwater Comprehensive Plan and Rate Study 500A: Draft and Final Write and revise Stormwater Comp- Final documents to describe work completed, Comprehensive Plan OCI rehensive Plan(except Chapter 6 Rate implementation plan, and next steps for City Study,which will be part of Task 400) 500B: Develop Education and OCI Create E&O materials to inform the E&O materials will be created to inform the public Outreach(E&O)Materials public of proposed rate changes of the benefits of increased stormwater rates 2IPage City of Spokane Valley Stormwater Comprehensive Plan and Rate Study Scope of Work Task 100: Project Management&Administration Objective: This task covers the management, administration, and coordination of the work by the Consultant Team as defined in this Contract including project management,preparation of monthly invoices,project schedule maintenance, and overall coordination with the City. Consultant Services Task IOOA:Project Management& Administration • General project coordination o Set up and close out the consultant contract. o Coordinate and manage the project team (including subconsultant)in the successful completion of the scope of work tasks. o Prepare and manage the project schedule o Prepare and manage issue log with the City and all team members. o Prepare amendments to this contract if needed. • Invoicing o Prepare and electronically submit monthly invoices with attached monthly status reports describing the following: • Services completed during the month • Services planned for next month • Need for additional information • Scope/Schedule/Budget issues,if applicable • Schedule update and financial status summary • Monthly Project Check-in Meetings with the City o Prepare for and attend monthly check-in meetings for the duration of the project. o The purpose of these meetings is to discuss project status with the City (work completed since previous meeting),review upcoming tasks/activities, and provide schedule updates. o The first check-in meeting will be a kickoff meeting for the Consultant team to meet with City stormwater staff to confirm the City's goals, objectives, and priorities for the project; identify planning criteria; coordinate on document and record collection; and review and confirm the project schedule including scheduling meetings,identifying who to interview (gap analysis)and the timeframe for interviews,determining deadlines for deliverables, identifying staff that will be interviewed,and identifying locations for field inspection. o Materials to be developed for these meetings include an agenda,meeting notes, and an action item list. o The Rate Study lead will attend meetings as needed. Hours for their project management time are included in Task 400. o The Gap Analysis lead will attend meetings as needed. Hours for their project management time are included in Task 300B. Client Responsibilities • Process payment of invoices within 30 calendar days of invoice. 31Page City of Spokane Valley Stormwater Comprehensive Plan and Rate Study Scope of Work • Review and process contract change requests and amendments,if needed. • Attend all meetings. Assumptions • The project duration will be eight(8)months starting after the contract is executed. • Invoices will be the Consultant Team standard invoice format, submitted electronically. Budget assumes eight(8)invoices and status reports over the project duration. • All meeting notes will be in a bulleted format and limited to a summary of the meeting discussion,decisions made, and action items. • Project Check-in Meeting agendas will be emailed to the client one business day before the meeting and meeting notes will be emailed to the City within 5 business days after meetings. • Check-in meetings with the Consultant team project manager will be held either face to face or via webinar depending on status of state meeting restrictions due to the coronavirus. Deliverables • Monthly Invoices and Status Report(email PDF). • Project Schedule and Schedule updates(email PDF). • Meeting agendas,notes, and list of action items for kick-off meetings and each monthly check-in meeting (PDF) Task 200: Data Collection Objective: This task focuses on collecting data needed to conduct the rate study and complete the stormwater comprehensive plan. Consultant Services The Consultant Team will compile a list of data needed for this project,including GIS data,maintenance or inventory records,procedural documents,reports,etc. including but not limited to the following items: • Stormwater Utility Assets within the City's geographical area covered by the MS4 Permit and/or by Underground Injection Control(UIC)Rule as well as any other assets that will be funded by the Stormwater utility (this is part of the Task 300B Gap Analysis and Task 300C Prioritize and Estimate Stormwater Improvement Project Cost). • UIC Well Data including existing City well assessments including point-rating values,categories, and category definitions(this is part of the Task 300B Gap Analysis and Task 300C Prioritize and Estimate Stormwater Improvement Project Cost). • Capital Improvement and Small Works Projects Information including estimated costs, schedule for design and construction, location, existing CIP list, and drainage complaint data. In addition,construction cost fees from other projects may be requested to inform future cost estimates associated with the City's Capital Improvement and Small Works Projects as part of their Stormwater utility (this is part of the Task 300C Prioritize and Estimate Stormwater Improvement Project Cost). • Land Cover, Zoning, and Traffic Data and any other information related to future customer growth forecasting, planning, or report documentation (this is part of the Task 400A Determine Revenue Requirements). 41Page City of Spokane Valley Stormwater Comprehensive Plan and Rate Study Scope of Work • Gap Analysis Information previously completed by the City, any procedural Level of Service reporting information (this is part of the Task 300B Gap Analysis). • Operation and Maintenance Data describing current practices and Full-Time Employee (FTE) needs to perform the Level(s) of Service desired by the City (this is part of the Task 300B Gap Analysis). The data collected will be reviewed by the Consultant Team and an inventory will be created. Gaps will be identified and documented, and an approach for addressing the gaps will be discussed with the City as part of this task. Client Responsibilities • Provide requested data within the agreed upon schedule. Assumptions • The process and results for the work conducted during this task will be summarized in Chapters 1,2, and 3,of the Stormwater Comprehensive Plan. • Drainage complaint data will be used to inform the recommended prioritization of the City's existing stormwater CIP project list and other stormwater improvement projects(as part of Task 400),however it will not be used to create or develop new CIP or stormwater improvement projects. Deliverables • Data Inventory (PDF and Excel) Task 300: Data Evaluation, Gap Analysis, and Cost Evaluations Objective: This task focuses on evaluating and analyzing data(from Task 200) needed to conduct the rate study and complete the stormwater comprehensive plan, including the gap analysis, and cost evaluations of City provided stormwater CIP projects. Task 300A: Stormwater Asset Data Evaluation and Review This task includes reviewing the City's existing inventory of stormwater assets including UICs within the City Limits. This information will be used to estimate long-term staffing and resource needs for managing the stormwater utility. This task also focuses on reviewing the City's existing stormwater systems and UICs to identify drainage areas of concern or priority areas for treatment. A synthesized list of the drainage areas of concern will be developed based on drainage complaint records,public comment, and information from City staff. The task is anticipated to include the following: • Review Inventory of Stormwater Assets o Review the City's existing GIS data and/or spreadsheet data gaps of stormwater assets. A recommendation will be made for collecting additional data. Stormwater assets to be reviewed include the following: • Storm drains • Manholes and catch basins 51Page City of Spokane Valley Stormwater Comprehensive Plan and Rate Study Scope of Work • Ditch and culvert conveyance systems • UIC Drywells and other infiltration facilities • Stormwater BMPs • Inventory gaps • Review Drainage Areas of Concern o The Consultant team will review "drainage areas of concern"through interviews with City staff and information from the data analysis (Task 200),expected to include drainage complaint records and public comments. Following the interviews,the Consultant team will confirm the list of up to 25 potential CIP projects (provided by the City). A table summarizing the potential projects will be developed and will include the following information: • CIP Project Summary: A summary will be developed including location,date(s) and type of stormwater feature (i.e.,culvert,drywell,BMP,catch basin,etc.),prior mitigation attempts,and the source of the information. • New Potential Projects: Any new potential CIP projects identified as a result of this work will be listed in the table and a recommended for future CIP development. Cost estimates will be based on projects of similar size or type. o Develop an 1 1x17 City-wide map that identifies all drainage areas of concern. o During a monthly check-in meeting with the City,the Consultant team will review and confirm the areas of concern identified, and which should be included in the stormwater comprehensive plan(Task 500). • QA/QC Review o Complete QA/QC review of recommendations memo,resource estimate,synthesized list of drainage areas of concern. Client Responsibilities • Provide (up to)25 potential stormwater CIP projects • Review and provide comments on GIS map within the agreed upon schedule • Provide existing GIS data and/or spreadsheet inventories of stormwater assets and list of gaps Assumptions • The process and results for the work conducted during this task will be summarized in Chapter 3 of the stormwater comprehensive plan. • Drainage complaint data will be used to inform the recommended prioritization of the City's existing stormwater CIP project list and other stormwater improvement projects(as part of Task 400),however it will not be used to create or develop new CIP or stormwater improvement projects or develop cost estimates. • Final copies of the map will be included in the stormwater comprehensive plan. Deliverables • Draft and final memorandum of recommendations for gaps in inventory of stormwater assets (Word and PDF) • One (1) 11x17 map showing City-wide drainage areas of concern. 61Page City of Spokane Valley Stormwater Comprehensive Plan and Rate Study Scope of Work Task 300B: Gap Analysis and Level of Service Evaluation The Consultant Team will assess the City's current Stormwater Management Program Plan (SWMP) for compliance to the 2019-2024 MS4 Permit. Specifically,the Consultant team will conduct a gap analysis by comparing the SWMP to the MS4 Permit,UIC Rule, and the level of service goals defined by the City, to determine areas where improvements and specific actions to meet compliance may be needed and to determine the resources needed to operate and maintain the stormwater utility. Information that will be collected for the assessment includes interviewing City staff and collecting and reviewing relevant documents/records.To complete the gap analysis,the Consultant team will review the compliance checklist that was developed by the City for completeness, then verify and build on that checklist to complete this task. • Gap Analysis Kick-Off Meeting o The Consultant team Project Manager and Gap Analysis Lead will prepare for and attend one (1)gap analysis kick-off meeting. o The purpose of this meeting is for the Consultant team to meet with the City Program Leads to prepare them for the gap analysis. This is expected to include: presenting an overview of the gap analysis process and schedule;providing the program leads with the compliance check-list relevant to their depaitnient;requesting needed documents and records; scheduling interviews with each program lead, and deadlines for providing documents and records. o Materials to be developed for these meetings include an agenda, final list of documents and records needed, final compliance checklist for each program lead,project schedule,meeting notes, and an action item list. • Identify Planning Criteria o Identify and summarize applicable requirements within the Stormwater Management Manual for Eastern Washington(including the UIC Rule),the Spokane Regional Stormwater Manual (SRSM),and City ordinances. This will include developing a summary of the relevant requirements which will be used guide the comprehensive plan. o Meet with the City to identify additional requirements, service level goals relative to the different elements of the stormwater program,a range of effort for each element of the program,or needs that will be addressed with the Stormwater Comprehensive Plan. These will be identified during the Project Kick-Off Meeting. o Additional planning criteria will be identified by completing the MS4 permit compliance checklist and gap analysis(see tasks below). • Customize Compliance Questionnaire/Checklist o The Consultant team has developed a permit compliance questionnaire and checklist that summarizes requirements in the EWA MS4 2019-2024 Permit coverage area. Following the project kick-off meeting the Consultant team will update to the document to include applicable UIC rule requirements as well as the City's level of service goals as needed to align with the City's goals and priorities for the project o The questionnaire/checklist will cover the items identified during the kickoff meeting along with the following program components from the City's MS4 permit: • General Requirements • S5.B.1 Public Education and Outreach(E&O) • S5.B2 Public Involvement and Participation 71Page City of Spokane Valley Stormwater Comprehensive Plan and Rate Study Scope of Work • S5.B.3 Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination(IDDE) • S5.B.4 Construction Site Stormwater Runoff Control • S5.B.5 Post Construction Stormwater Management for New Development and Redevelopment • S5.B.6 Municipal Operations and Maintenance (O&M) • S8.Monitoring and Assessment • S9. Reporting and Record Keeping • UIC Rule (WAC 173-218) • Coverage of areas identified as MS4 or UIC by the City • Collect Documents and Records o Identify and collect documents and records needed to complete the compliance checklist, as needed. The draft list of needed documents and records will be provided at the Project Kick- Off meeting as needed. This list may include but not be limited to the following: • Past Stormwater Management Plan(s) and Annual Reports • Notifications of non-compliance • Interlocal agreements • Standard Operating Procedures(SOPS) • Program description documents: Stormwater Design/O&M Manuals,etc. • Effectiveness Study Documents • Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) • Spokane Regional Stormwater Manual(SRSM) and/or the Ecology Stormwater Management Manual for Eastern Washington(SWMMEW) • SWPPP for City sites • Stormwater Related Standard Details • Public Education and Outreach Materials • GIS database of stormwater facilities: storm drain systems,outfalls,BMPs,etc. • Maintenance Records • City Staff Training Records • Construction Site Project Files • Spokane Valley Street Standards(SVSS) o Develop an inventory of the documents and records collected. • Interview Program Leads o Interview City personnel who are the program leads for different elements of MS4 and UIC Rule compliance, as well as desired level of service for the stormwater utility to provide for those aspects of the utility that are not governed by the MS4 Permit or the UIC Rule,or aspects for which the City needs a higher level of service than required. Interviews will cover all elements of permit compliance that are under the lead's authority. The following leads are expected to be interviewed: • The City's Stormwater Manager • Operations and Maintenance Lead • Education& Outreach(E&O)Lead • New development/redevelopment(post construction) Lead • Construction Lead • Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination (IDDE)Lead 81Page City of Spokane Valley Stormwater Comprehensive Plan and Rate Study Scope of Work • Monitoring and Assessment Lead o Develop interview notes on the components discussed in the interviews. o Conduct follow-up interviews if necessary • Additional Maintenance Staff Interview Questions o During the interview with City maintenance staff(responsible for maintaining the existing stormwater system) additional questions will also be asked to collect the following information: • List of responsibilities of maintenance crew for covering maintenance needs beyond what is required for compliance with the MS4 permit or UIC rule. • List and description of known drainage areas of concern or other types of problem areas that may need to be addressed as part of the comprehensive plan and rate study. • Review Documentation and Complete Compliance Checklist o Review documents and records collected during the documentation collection portion of this task. This will include reviewing and confirming the information provided in the compliance checklist the City has developed. o Evaluate program components identified in the Compliance Questionnaire and Checklist compared to the City's current municipal code to assess permit compliance. For each section and subsection of the MS4 permit,the following information will be entered into the compliance checklist: • Summary of existing and planned activities associated with compliance. For planned activities,the planned date for implementation will also be noted. • Rating of program's permit requirement coverage, rated as "none", "partial", "meets", or "exceeds" • Description of program gap • List of responsible staff • Estimated annual staffing needs and other resources associated with permit requirement. Staffing needs will be estimated as the number of full-time employees(FTEs)required to meet permit requirements. • Each program component requirement will be categorized by the following six types to assist with organizing gaps and recommendations: — Data Management—Requirements regarding the collection of sets of information such as monitoring,mapping,water quality,etc. — Policy Development&Implementation—Requirements regarding utility and/or City procedures,ordinances,municipal code,new and redevelopment requirements,LID, etc. as well as a schedule for implementation — Training—Requirements regarding education of staff,businesses, and public — Documentation—Requirements regarding the submittal of documents/reports to Ecology and/or the creation of documents/reports for internal use or distribution to the public — Record Keeping—Requirements to retain information,records, and forms — Operations& Maintenance—Requirements for the physical operation and maintenance of structural stormwater system elements 91Page City of Spokane Valley Stormwater Comprehensive Plan and Rate Study Scope of Work o Create inventory of City resources required for implementing the new Comprehensive Plan and identify additional needed resources. This may include personnel and financial resources as well as office equipment, field and monitoring equipment, and operations and maintenance equipment. • Develop Resource Estimate o Using the results of the MS4 permit and UIC Rule gap analysis and the recommendations for the City's inventory of stormwater assets developed in this task,develop an estimate of annual resources including FTEs and equipment needed to complete the duties of the Stormwater Utility. The FTE estimate will include the number of FTEs needed to accomplish the following: • Meeting MS4 permit and UIC Rule requirements • Maintaining stormwater assets not regulated by the MS4 permit and/or the UIC Rule • Responding to public drainage complaints,requests for information, and other interactions with the public • Managing design and construction of City stormwater projects • Supervision of full-time employees and temporary seasonal staff • Securing funding for the Stormwater Utility through grant applications or other methods • Completing new Stormwater Utility responsibilities(e.g. UIC well rehabilitation,etc.) • Anticipated increase in FTEs needed during a 20-year planning horizon using a multiplier based on City growth projections o Provide recommendations for the City's inventory of stormwater assets that can be used for estimating maintenance staffing and equipment needs. The recommendations may include the following information: • Total length of linear assets(pipes,ditches,etc.) • Total number of point assets(manholes,catch basins,BMPs,etc.) • Maintenance frequency for each type of asset • Staffing (FTEs)needed to manage each type of asset • Type of equipment needed to maintain each asset • Gap Analysis and Recommendations for Improvement o Compare the MS4 permit requirements and UIC Rule guidance in the compliance checklist to the information collected about the City's existing SWMP,Municipal Code,or ordinances to identify gaps in permit compliance. Identify and develop a summary of each gap and areas for improvement. o Assess and define the up to two options for the desired level of service (from program lead interviews, and discussions with City staff)to be provided by the stormwater utility. For example manage the entire geographical area following the MS4 Permit or a separate area managed by the UIC Rule and the MS4 Permit. o Develop a plan and schedule (table format) for implementing improvements. Possible improvement recommendations may include updates to City ordinances,modifications to the O&M program,increased monitoring,changes to record keeping procedures, and other improvements that may help with improving permit compliance. o Identify resources needed for implementing improvements including funding,FTEs required, and equipment and specific resources needed to manage the range of levels of service considered as part of this task. 101Page City of Spokane Valley Stormwater Comprehensive Plan and Rate Study Scope of Work • Record Keeping Recommendations o During interview with Program Leads,questions will be asked about existing processes for collecting and maintaining permit required records as well as existing processes for conducting related work. o Using the information collected,draft flow chart(s)will be developed that outline the existing processes and draft recommended processes. Follow up meetings with Program Leads will be scheduled via webinar or phone call to confirm the existing process and review/collect their feedback on the recommended processes. o Feedback collected will be incorporated into the flow charts which will be submitted with the draft report(Task 500) for review. • QA/QC Review o Complete QA/QC review of compliance checklist,improvement plan,flow chart(s), and Resource estimate. Client Responsibilities • Provide the requested documents,records,and information for the Consultant Team to complete the compliance checklist within an agreed-upon timeline after receiving the Consultant Team's request for information. • The City is responsible for coordinating with the Program Leads to identify all the staff that need to attend interviews to address questions that focus on the specific section(s)of the permit under the Program Leads authority. • The City will use track changes,mark-up, and/or comment options in Excel or a PDF compatible program to provide comments on draft deliverables. • Review project deliverables and provide one consolidated list of review comments on the project shared site for the Consultant Team within the agreed-upon time frame. • The City Project Manager will review comments provided by City staff and identify which comments the Consultant team will address as well as provide proposed resolution for conflicting comments. • Attend interviews with program leads. Assumptions • The Consultant team will set up a OneDrive or SharePoint project site for sharing project documents with the City or use a site setup by the City. • This work contract for Task 300B will not include any field assessments or inspections. • Interviews will be scheduled by the Consultant team with each program lead and relevant staff to focus on the specific section(s)of the permit under the program leads authority.If follow-up questions are needed with the program lead,they will be conducted over the phone. • Meetings and interviews will be held either face to face or via webinar depending on status of state meeting restrictions due to the coronavirus. • The budget for the Consultant team to collect and review the City's documentation and complete the compliance checklist assume that documentations(documents and records)provided by the City are complete (contain the information needed to complete the checklist),readable,in an electronic format that is searchable, and organized in a way that is efficient for obtaining information(e.g. organized by type of document, City depait,uent,date collected,etc.). After receiving the City's documentation,if more time is needed for organizing or sorting documents, the Consultant team will set up a meeting with the City to discuss the document(s) and determine 111Page City of Spokane Valley Stormwater Comprehensive Plan and Rate Study Scope of Work whether the City will complete additional organization work or issue an amendment for the Consultant team to organize the documents. • The Consultant team will use the comment option in Excel or a PDF compatible program to respond to all City comments on draft deliverables. Revisions to draft deliverables will be submitted via email back to the City for official record of how the comments were addressed. • The budget assumes one round of comments from the City on draft deliverables which the Consultant team will incorporate into the final documents. • Gap analysis will not require additional Stormwater Capital Improvement Projects (CIPs)or updates to already developed City provided Capital Improvement Projects (CIPs). Deliverables • Information/Data Requests(email) • Inventory Summarizing Documents and Records Collected and Reviewed(Excel file) • Draft and final compliance questionnaire/checklist(Excel file)with typed interview notes. • Draft and final resource estimate in table format(PDF) • Draft and final tables summarizing the following items organized by permit section(Excel files): o Summary of SWMP gaps for UIC Rule or MS4 Permit o Recommend areas for improvement and schedule for implementation o Summary of existing resources (including costs),resources required,and additional resources needed • The deliverables for this subtask will also be included in Chapters 2, 3, and 5 of the Stormwater Comprehensive Plan(Task 500). Task 300C:Prioritize and Estimate Stormwater Capital Improvement Project Costs This task includes reviewing the City's planned stormwater improvement project list(forecasted capital improvement and small works projects from Task 300A),UIC retrofit plan,and the replacement cost of existing systems. Following the review and assessment, the Consultant team will provide recommendations for construction costs and prioritization to achieve the City's desired level of service, as well as an action plan identifying next steps to implement the stormwater improvement project plan and goals. This information will be documented in the Stormwater Comprehensive Plan and is expected to include: • Assess Cost of Forecasted UIC Retrofit Plans o Review and assess available data(Task 200)provided by the City,including existing UIC well assessment and available local pollutant loading information. The information will be used to complete the following: • Evaluate City UIC Assessment for adequate scoring strategy and provide recommendation regarding proper scoring allowance relative to: — Average Daily Traffic (ADT) Counts — Upstream protections,including the non-endangerment standard — Source control,including zoning • Review City's current long-term strategies and goals relative to point reduction and provide recommendation regarding the proposed strategies including the following specific items: 121Page City of Spokane Valley Stormwater Comprehensive Plan and Rate Study Scope of Work — Total number of points (per the City's UIC well assessment system)for the total number of drywells. — City-wide total average point value. — Target City-wide total average point value (i.e. City-wide average of 3.0 for a low risk of pollutant loading) — Time (in years)to reach goal with specific target point reductions/year — UIC retrofit priority strategy and UIC retrofit overall strategy — Budget estimate per point to reach goal — Project checklists, flow charts,or other resources that assist or guide the City to meet the UIC retrofit project strategy • Evaluate Replacement Cost of Existing Systems o Review and assess available data provided by the City (Task 200),including available costs from City records for replacement of existing stormwater systems (assets including collection conveyance,UIC wells,or other stormwater facilities),and assess the impacts that high-level changes may have on future cost forecasts and whether or when stormwater facilities could be upgraded,replaced,or added based on high/medium/low categorization of specific projects or types of projects. The information will be used to complete the following: ■ Evaluation of existing systems,which may include: — Existing asset condition data provided by the City(Task 200) — Inspection and/or maintenance records of stormwater assets — Determining the amount of affected assets and their level of priority,based on specific criteria developed with input from the City. This will include developing a rubric or decision flow-chart of critical variables such as age,materials,number of reported drainage issues,etc. to determine both the likelihood and consequences of failure as well as estimate sizing for retrofits or new systems. — Provide recommendations for prioritization of future stormwater system improvement programs ■ Determine a strategy for UIC rehabilitation or replacement,which may include consideration of: — Pentagons — Non-standard structures — Failing UICs (holding water) — Visual inspection indicators — Time-in-service • Recommend strategy for other facilities, including: — BMPs — Catch basins — Stormwater Pipes — Culverts — Pump Stations • Develop an annual budget for existing system replacement including: 131Page City of Spokane Valley Stormwater Comprehensive Plan and Rate Study Scope of Work — Timeline for expected full-system replacement — Projected costs considering future inflation timeline — Level of Service-based replacement • Cost of Forecasted Capital Improvement and Small Works Projects o Review and assess available data(Task 200)provided by the City,including available costs from City records for past or planned capital improvement and/or small works projects, and project schedules. The projects will be identified as "compliance"or"improvement"projects as part of this work. The information will be used to complete the following: • Assess planned CIP street projects (from the City's existing TIP)and opportunities to include the following as part of the street projects: — UIC retrofit strategy and plan — UIC rehabilitation and replacement strategy — Other stormwater facility rehabilitation and replacement strategy(s) — Service contract comments identifying stormwater improvements(within project limits) — Percentage cost of stormwater improvements associated with past street projects for future forecasting • Review and estimate costs and schedule of City's existing identified Stormwater Improvement projects(up to 25 projects) • Assess City's Small Works projects roster and annual budget needs and schedules(up to two scenarios,e.g. short-term and long-term),consistent with the Level-of-Service identified in Task 200C including the following components: — Service contract comments identifying stormwater improvements(city-wide) — Fixed budgeting consideration and determination(e.g. $200-300k per 1-2-year period) — Maximum threshold definition for small works protocols • Prioritize Stormwater Improvement Projects o Develop a rubric,with input from the City,to prioritize projects using the categories below, which will be used to give each CIP project a normalized score with a maximum possible score of 100 points consistent with the City's current scoring system. • Construction cost(where appropriate,construction costs may be based on percentage estimates for local costs of stormwater work related to larger construction efforts) • 20-year maintenance cost • Risk of continued drainage issues • Public benefit • Compliance with stormwater requirements • Planning-level pre-design requirements o The information from the above subtasks will be consolidated into a single table and will include the following information: • Project name and ID number • Project location within an I Ix17 vicinity map • Project description(1-2 sentences) 141Page City of Spokane Valley Stormwater Comprehensive Plan and Rate Study Scope of Work ■ Construction cost-estimates provided by the City (Task 200),with percentage-based estimates of contingency, sales tax,fees for design,survey,permitting, and construction management, if needed, and future cost forecasting based on anticipated project construction timeline o Meet with the City during a project check-in meeting to review the prioritization results from and update the project rankings based on input from the City. • QA/QC Review o Complete QA/QC review of stormwater improvement project prioritization and cost estimate and forecasting. Client Responsibilities • Review and provide input on the selection/prioritization of CIPs and GIS maps within the agreed upon schedule Assumptions • Maps and flow charts completed during this project will be incorporated into the comprehensive plan. • Stormwater modeling and pollutant loading are not included in this scope of work. Facility retrofits will be sized generically based on the City's UIC well assessment system. • Sizing of assets will not be provided. CIP costs will be approximate and use comparable based on catchment area or other relative measure. • Drainage complaint data will be used to inform evaluation process,however it will not be used to create or develop new CIP or stormwater improvement projects. Development of additional CIPs will be considered additional services. • Asset replacement costs will be provided at a programmatic level for each of the asset types. Targeted replacement dates for specific individual assets will not be provided. Deliverables • Summary table of CIP projects with cost and recommended prioritization (PDF). • The deliverables for this subtask will be included in Chapters 2, 3, and 6 of the Stormwater Comprehensive Plan(Task 500). Task 400: Prepare Rate Study Objective: This task focuses on completing a stormwater fee rate study including data collection, developing a policy framework, determining revenue and level-of-service requirements, and developing recommendations for updated stormwater fee rates. The Consultant team will facilitate the coordination and review work as described in this task, and the Rate Study Lead will complete the rate study components as described in Exhibit A. • Rate Study Kick-Off Meeting o Prepare for and attend one (1)rate study kick-off meeting. o The purpose of this meeting is for the Consultant Team to meet with the City Project Manager to prepare them for the scope and process of conducting the rate study. 151Page City of Spokane Valley Stormwater Comprehensive Plan and Rate Study Scope of Work o An initial project meeting will be scheduled with the City,the Consultant Team Project Manager and Rate Study Lead to confirm an understanding of the rate study's goals, objectives, and potential issues and concerns(from all parties), as well as identify the information the Consultant team will need to conduct the rate study. • Public Meeting o Prepare for and attend one (1) in-person public meeting. • The purpose of this public meeting is to update the public about the project status and obtain feedback from the public on the proposed changes to the stormwater fee rates. The meeting will be hosted by the Rate Study Lead and the Consultant Team Project Manager. • The format for this meeting will be in person. The meeting recording and materials will be posted on the City website for an online comment period,described below in this task. • Materials to be developed and presented to the public include: - An announcement for the newspaper regarding the meeting purpose,time, and location. - A PowerPoint presentation to summarize the new stormwater rates and the findings of the comprehensive plan (created by the Consultant team). - A four-page flier with information about the project and the project status, the timeline for the new stormwater rates to be implemented, and an aerial map with the proposed study area. The flier will also include discussion about the benefits of the rate increase to the public. • Online Comment Period o The Consultant team will develop materials and the City will post the materials on a website for a 30-day public comment period. These materials will include the proposed rate increases and Level of Service plans. o Follow up work includes consolidating public comments into a table format and developing draft responses to the comments. • City Council Meeting o The purpose of this meeting is to update the City Council about the project status and obtain feedback on the proposed changes to the stormwater fee rates as well as the proposed stormwater comprehensive plan. o The format for this meeting is anticipated to be in-person,but may be changed to an online format depending on the status of the state meeting restrictions due to the coronavirus. o The Consultant team will work with City staff on preparing rate study presentation materials for a City Council meeting.The presentation will present study findings, allowing City Council members to be better equipped to make decisions that are to the benefit of the long- term health of the utility. o Attend and present at one (1) City Council meeting regarding the following: • Revenue requirements identified during the study. • Rate design alternatives and proposed rates. 161Page City of Spokane Valley Stormwater Comprehensive Plan and Rate Study Scope of Work Assumptions • Rate Study Kick Off Meeting participants could include a representative from departments that can address issues related to finance,engineering,operations,customer service (if applicable) and administration. Additional City staff participants will be identified during a monthly check-in meeting with the City. • The Kick Off Meeting, Open House and Council Meeting will be attended by the Consultant Team Project Manager,Rate Study Task Lead and Gap Analysis Lead. Client Responsibilities • Attend project meetings • Organize, schedule, and host the City Council Meeting • Review and provide comment on the Consultant Team deliverables within the agreed upon schedule Task 500: Develop Stormwater Comprehensive Plan and Rate Study Objective: This task focuses on developing a written summary of the work complete, the process for making decisions during this study including recommendations and an execution plan. The outline of chapters and chapter content is summarized in Table 2. These chapters will be written as the associated work is completed in the subsequent tasks. This task also includes work associated with developing education and outreach materials about the revised stormwater rates. Consultant Services Task 500A:Draft and Final Comprehensive Plan This task includes developing and writing the content for the draft and final versions of the Stormwater Comprehensive Plan and Rate Study. • Execution Plan and Next Steps o In coordination with the City,create a plan for developing and executing the CIP recommendations including how and when the work could be phased as well as funding sources identified in the rate study (Task 400). o Provide a summary and discussion of issues and observations made during the project that may need action in the future but were out of scope or beyond the scope of the current project to be completed. This summary will be incorporated into the Comprehensive Plan. • Develop Comprehensive Plan o Develop a draft and final version of the stormwater comprehensive plan as outlined in Table 2. o Submit the draft comprehensive plan to the City for review. o Address City comments in the draft comprehensive plan and submit the final version incorporating updates based on comments. 171Page City of Spokane Valley Stormwater Comprehensive Plan and Rate Study Scope of Work Task 500B:Develop Education and Outreach Materials This task includes creating education and outreach materials to inform the public about the stormwater rate increases and the Stormwater Comprehensive Plan and Rate Study. The material content will include information about the reason for rate increases and how the Stormwater Utility benefits the public. Materials will include the following: o Online material: Summary of comprehensive plan findings,proposed CIP projects,other benefits provided by the Stormwater utility(e.g.,operations and maintenance,response to stormwater problem areas,etc.),proposed rate increases. o Fact Sheet: Brief summary of key comprehensive plan findings and updated stormwater utility rates with direction to City's website for additional information and feedback opportunities. Table 2: Summary of Stormwater Comprehensive Plan Chapters Chapter Title and Description Draft Final Fact Sheet Purpose: Provide an overview of the study, key outcomes, plans for future work, and overview of the comprehensive plan contents. Chapter 1. Introduction and Planning Criteria Purpose: Provide background information on the comprehensive plan, an overview of goals,and outline how goals will be achieved. Chapter 2. Gap Analysis and Stormwater Utility Management Purpose: Summarize the results of the MS4 permit compliance gap analysis and recommendations for improvements and resources needed to comply with all permit and UIC Rule requirements. Summarize all other responsibilities of the Stormwater Utility and resources needed to accomplish those responsibilities. Chapter 3. Existing Stormwater System Purpose: High level description of existing stormwater system including conveyance systems and stormwater facilities. Describe drainage areas of concern that were identified, solution alternatives, and potential for addressing drainage problems as part of a small works, CIP, UIC retrofit, or standalone stormwater improvement project. Chapter 4. Financing and Rates Purpose:Provide an overview of all work completed in the rate study including data collection, developing a policy framework, determining revenue and level-of- service requirements,and developing recommendations for updated stormwater fee rates. Chapter 5. Level of Service Purpose: Describe the scenarios and range of effort considered as part of the level of service evaluation including goals for level of service to be provided,the desired level of service, and the level of service provided for areas covered by the MS4 Permit or the UIC Rule. 181Page City of Spokane Valley Stormwater Comprehensive Plan and Rate Study Scope of Work Chapter Title and Description Draft Final Chapter 6. Execution Plan and Next Steps Purpose: Describe the implementation plan for all actions identified in the comprehensive plan including implementation of new stormwater fee rates, and schedule for constructing CIP projects and implementing other work identified during this study. This chapter will also include recommendations for projects that are potential candidates for grant awards. Client Responsibilities • Review the documents within the agreed upon schedule. • Use the track changes and comment options in Word to provide consolidated comments and suggested revisions in a single document. Assumptions • The Consultant Team will use the comment option to respond to all comments or revisions in Word and address recommended changes using the track changes option. • The revised chapters will be submitted Microsoft OneDrive (with track changes turned on and comment responses)back to the City for the official record of how the comments were addressed. In addition,the Consultant Team will also email a clean copy of the chapter to the City. • Maps and flow charts completed during this project will be incorporated into the comprehensive plan. Deliverables • Draft and Final Fact Sheet(Word and PDF). • Comment responses addressing City comments on Draft report chapters • Draft and Final copies of each report chapter(Word and PDF). Task 600 Manager's Reserve Objective: This task includes additional funds for work that may be requested during the project duration, beyond this scope, to allow the City an opportunity to avoid returning to City Council for additional budget approval. Consultant Services This task includes additional funds for work that will be engaged only with prior written authorization by the City beyond the scope and fees in described in Tasks 100-500 of this contract. This work is limited to a maximum of$10,000 and may include items such as: • Grant Writing Support • Additional E&O Materials • Out of scope work added during project 191Page City of Spokane Valley Stormwater Comprehensive Plan and Rate Study Scope of Work Project Schedule and Fees The proposed project schedule and proposed fees are summarized in Table 3 and Table 4 respectively.The project schedule will be further developed and finalized during the project kick-off meeting. Table 3: Proposed Project Schedule Task Task Title Anticipated Dates 100 Project Management&Administration April—October 200 Data Collection April—May 300 Data Evaluation, Gap Analysis, and Cost Evaluations May—June 400 Prepare Rate Study June—July 500 Develop Stormwater Comprehensive Plan and Rate Study July- September 600 Manager's Reserve N/A Table 4: Summary of Fees by Task Task Task Title Fees 100 Project Management&Administration $24,616 200 Data Collection $6,560 300 Data Evaluation, Gap Analysis, and Cost Evaluations $101,792 400 Prepare Rate Study $79,732 500 Develop Stormwater Comprehensive Plan and Rate Study $59,912 600 Manager's Reserve $10,000 Total $282,612 201Page EXHIBIT A - FCS GROUP'S SCOPE OF WORK Task 1—Initial project meeting An initial on-site project meeting (or remote meeting if necessary)will be scheduled to obtain an understanding of the study's goals, objectives, and potential issues and concerns (from both parties). Discussion topics could include the following: • Fiscal policies—The rate study will include recommended policies for ongoing reserve levels, capital funding, repair and replacement funding, etc. Task 2—Data collection Data collection will include a Word-formatted document that will be provided to OCI for distribution to City staff before the initial project meeting. It will outline key information required to complete the tasks outlined in the proposed work plan, such as: 1. Cost of forecasted capital improvement projects. 2. Cost of forecasted UIC retrofit plan. 3. Cost of forecasted Small Works projects. 4. Evaluate replacement cost of existing systems. Consultant shall propose a methodology for evaluation. 5. Maintenance costs related to future infrastructure growth regulated by the City's municipal stormwater permit. 6. Maintenance costs related to future infrastructure growth regulated by the UIC program. 7. Future customer growth 8. Narrative description of existing program level of service. Task 3—Prepare Rate Study Task 3a- Determine revenue requirements The revenue requirement is defined as the total amount of rate revenue needed to meet an enterprise's financial obligations, including capital, operating, and policy-driven commitments. Using an Excel spreadsheet model, we will project operations and capital revenue requirements for a 10-year period. The model will be constructed with user-friendliness in mind and will accommodate user-entry of key data and assumptions. The financial plan will include Stormwater Management Fund 402 and will allow for the inclusion of costs now recovered through the Spokane County Aquifer Protection Area fee and deposited into the Aquifer Protection Fund 403. The model will be flexible and stable enough to analyze multiple scenarios and/or levels of service. 1. The long-range financial forecast shall span ten (10)years. 2. Include yearly cash flows; forecasted revenues and expenditures; maintenance costs; and capital project costs. 3. Identify revenue requirement assumptions including general and construction cost inflation; personnel costs; fund earnings; customer growth; and debt assumptions. It is understood that capital projects will likely be funded on a pay- as-you-go basis,without the use of debt. 4. Make recommendations on the structure of Stormwater Management Fund(s), Attachment A—Scope of Work Page 1 of 3 currently Fund 402. Include recommendations on rate funded system reinvestment requirements; target utility reserves; and fund minimum balance requirements. 5. Evaluate revenue sufficiency. 6. The recommended rate structure shall be planned for six (6) years with recommendations on future increases. The revenue requirement results may be presented in a matrix format, describing service level options by program component, and corresponding rates. An example is provided below. Task 3b-Cost of service The cost-of-service analysis establishes both (1) a defensible basis for assigning "cost shares," and (2) "equity" for system customers based on industry standard methodologies that are tailored to the City's unique characteristics. This analytical exercise will allow for alternative rate structures to be calculated and considered. An alternative rate structure could include separating the rate two components: (1) a per account component to recover costs that do not vary by the imperviousness of the parcel and (2) an impervious-based component similar to the City's existing approach.The results may indicate shifts in cost recovery that could improve equity relative to the existing rate structure. 1. Develop a fair and equitable allocation of costs to allow for the consideration of alternative rate structure(s) 2. Discuss options and considerations for revising the rate structure 3. Provide a summary of the average unit costs (cost-based rates) Task 3c—Review and Update Existing Surface Water Management Rates Develop cost-based rate options based on the City stormwater program as it relates to growth. Include increased maintenance costs and capital plans related to the growth in the infrastructure and changes to the general municipal permit and UIC program requirements. Applying the revenue requirement results and the customer information. Rate structure options could include the following: 'Across the Board': Apply rate adjustments equally to the existing structure • 'Cost of Service': Apply rate components such as a fixed rate per account and an impervious- based rate to align rates with an equitable share of utility costs Surface Water Program Component Service Level Capital Maintenance Water Quality Public Education Administration Drainage WQ!Habitat System Rehab Limited Repair Reactive System Minimum General Fund Status Quo Existing Unfunded Projects Maintenance Regulatory Existing Transfers;Billing& Requirements Collection SS S SS s S SS Fix Severe Grant Funded Repair Some With Maintenance at Minimum General Fund Proactive Problems Only Proactive Rehab Prescribed Regulatory Existing Transfers;Billing& Frequencies Requirements Collection SSS S SS SSS S S SS Fix Severe and Grant Funded Full Asset Full Asset Forecasted General Fund Optimal Moderate Problems and City Funding Management Management Regulatory Expanded Program Transfers;Billing& Requirements Collection SSSS sss ssss ssss ss ss SS Attachment A—Scope of Work Page 2 of 3 Task 3d—Draft Report, Meetings, and Presentations Provide a draft report of the study. The draft report will document the rate study process, methodology, key assumptions, and results and recommendations. A summary of key model spreadsheets (in excel format)will be included in the report technical appendix. We will also deliver a final copy of the Excel-based spreadsheet models for City use.The models will provide for 1) evaluation of revenue and cost changes on rates, 2) analysis of fiscal policy implementation options, 3) analysis of changes in economic and financial indicators,4) rate smoothing, and 5)variances to other key rate study inputs including the capital plan, the operating budget, customer information, etc. Assume up to six(6)virtual meetings in addition to the initial project meeting.These meetings are to present the study to City staff and to discuss comments.The City anticipates multiple discussions at varying times. Task 3e-Workshops, meeting and public hearings Work with City staff on preparing rate study presentation materials and presenting materials at up to two (2) remote and two (2) on-site public workshops, Council meetings and/or public hearings. Presentation materials will include a comparison of stormwater rates with other Eastern Washington jurisdictions of similar size. The material to be presented will likely also include the following: • The review of revenue requirements and cost of service • The review of the rate design • The proposed rates • Other items as required Task 4—Final Study Based on direction after the completion of the public meetings (from Task 3e), make revisions to the report as directed and provide the final rate study report. By waiting to finalize the report until after receiving comments from the public meetings,we can ensure that the final report reflects comments from the public and Council, as necessary.The report will reflect what was adopted by City Council, thereby closing the loop between recommendations and Council action. Attachment A—Scope of Work Page 3 of 3 City of Spokane Valley Stormwater Comprehensive Plan and Rate Study Scope of Work SCOPE OF WORK Project: City of Spokane Valley Stormwater Comprehensive Plan and Rate Study PRIME Consultant: Osborn Consulting,Inc. Contract No.: Background The goal of this project is to develop a stormwater comprehensive plan,rate study, and proposed rate revision plan for the City of Spokane Valley(City). The City owns,operates, and maintains a Stormwater Utility which includes infrastructure governed by the Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) Permit as well as the Underground Injection Control(UIC)Program (UIC Rule)governed by Washington Administrative Code (WAC 173-218). The stormwater comprehensive plan developed as part of this project will address new and increased requirements of the MS4 Permit and UIC Rule Guidance,updated projections of future customer and infrastructure growth and development, and adjustment of stormwater rates and rate structure to maintain sustainable funding of the City's Stormwater Utility. Osborn Consulting,Inc. (OCI)has teamed with FCS GROUP(FCS) and Evergreen StormH2O (Evergreen)to complete the work described in this contract. An overview of the tasks associated with the work is provided in Table 1. The City of Spokane Valley stormwater utility has been in place since the City's incorporation in 2003. The impervious-based rate of$21 per year is imposed uniformly on single family residences,duplexes, triplexes, and fourplexes. All other developed property is charged$21 for every 3,160 square feet of measured impervious surface area—the average amount of impervious surface area on single family residences in Spokane Valley. The stormwater rate is expected to generate about$1.9 million in 2022 to fund 402. The stormwater program also receives funding from the Spokane County Aquifer Protection Area fee, imposed on each water meter by meter size. Funds from this source must be "expended entirely on stormwater related projects that are designed to protect the aquifer."This fee will sunset in November of 2024 without a regional public vote. This fee is expected to generate over$450,000 in 2022 to fund 403. The task plan described below would provide a multi-year revenue requirement(financial plan), a cost-of- service analysis, and rate structure options,with supporting outreach and documentation.The goal is to have this rate study and the proposed rate revisions completed in time to present it at required public hearing meetings and obtain City Council approval by August 2022 for Council adoption and implementation for 2023. 11Page City of Spokane Valley Stormwater Comprehensive Plan and Rate Study Scope of Work Table 1: Task Overview Task Team Description of Work Application to Project Goal 100: Project Management& OCI Manage and direct the team in the successful completion of tasks. Administration 200: Data Collection OCI Collect available data Data will inform gap analysis, cost evaluations, and rate updates 300: Data Evaluation, Gap Analysis, and Cost Evaluations 300A: Stormwater Asset Data Review Task 200 data, develop High-level conditions assessment will inform Evaluation and Review OCI stormwater asset inventory and assess stormwater project prioritizations and repair/ drainage areas of concern replacement recommendations for existing systems 300B: Gap Analysis and Review Task 200 data, conduct gap Gap analysis will identify areas for improvement of Level of Service Evaluation OCI analysis existing City practices related to stormwater and level of service goals 300C: Prioritize and Estimate Review Task 200 data, assess costs for Cost evaluations will be used to inform the new Stormwater Improvement OCI future stormwater-related projects and stormwater rates and the prioritization of projects in Project Costs recommend level of service the stormwater comprehensive plan 400: Prepare Rate Study 400A: Determine Revenue FCS Review Task 200 data, identify require- This subtask will inform the rate study/structure, as Requirements ments, assumptions, and rate study goals well as scenarios/levels of service analyzed 400B: Cost of Service FCS Review Tasks 200 and 300 data to inform Level of service goals (from Task 300B)will inform proposed cost and level of service recommended average unit rate costs 400C: Review and Update Review Task 300 deliverable data to Recommended rate increases will be proposed Existing Surface Water FCS inform proposed rate increases considering sustainable funding to meet the City's Management Rates desired level of service, and future projects 400D: Draft Report, Document recommendations and Recommended rate increases will be reviewed with Meetings, and Presentations FCS/OCI findings,with review/comment from City City staff for comment before finalizing 400E: Workshops,Meetings, Public meetings and City Council Public feedback and City Council comments will be and Public Hearings and presentations/workshops will message the incorporated into the increased rates, as appropriate proposed rate increases to those affected 500: Develop Stormwater Comprehensive Plan and Rate Study 500A: Draft and Final Write and revise Stormwater Comp- Final documents to describe work completed, Comprehensive Plan OCI rehensive Plan(except Chapter 6 Rate implementation plan, and next steps for City Study,which will be part of Task 400) 500B: Develop Education and OCI Create E&O materials to inform the E&O materials will be created to inform the public Outreach(E&O)Materials public of proposed rate changes of the benefits of increased stormwater rates 2IPage City of Spokane Valley Stormwater Comprehensive Plan and Rate Study Scope of Work Task 100: Project Management&Administration Objective: This task covers the management, administration, and coordination of the work by the Consultant Team as defined in this Contract including project management,preparation of monthly invoices,project schedule maintenance, and overall coordination with the City. Consultant Services Task IOOA:Project Management& Administration • General project coordination o Set up and close out the consultant contract. o Coordinate and manage the project team (including subconsultant)in the successful completion of the scope of work tasks. o Prepare and manage the project schedule o Prepare and manage issue log with the City and all team members. o Prepare amendments to this contract if needed. • Invoicing o Prepare and electronically submit monthly invoices with attached monthly status reports describing the following: • Services completed during the month • Services planned for next month • Need for additional information • Scope/Schedule/Budget issues,if applicable • Schedule update and financial status summary • Monthly Project Check-in Meetings with the City o Prepare for and attend monthly check-in meetings for the duration of the project. o The purpose of these meetings is to discuss project status with the City (work completed since previous meeting),review upcoming tasks/activities, and provide schedule updates. o The first check-in meeting will be a kickoff meeting for the Consultant team to meet with City stormwater staff to confirm the City's goals, objectives, and priorities for the project; identify planning criteria; coordinate on document and record collection; and review and confirm the project schedule including scheduling meetings,identifying who to interview (gap analysis)and the timeframe for interviews,determining deadlines for deliverables, identifying staff that will be interviewed,and identifying locations for field inspection. o Materials to be developed for these meetings include an agenda,meeting notes, and an action item list. o The Rate Study lead will attend meetings as needed. Hours for their project management time are included in Task 400. o The Gap Analysis lead will attend meetings as needed. Hours for their project management time are included in Task 300B. Client Responsibilities • Process payment of invoices within 30 calendar days of invoice. 31Page City of Spokane Valley Stormwater Comprehensive Plan and Rate Study Scope of Work • Review and process contract change requests and amendments,if needed. • Attend all meetings. Assumptions • The project duration will be eight(8)months starting after the contract is executed. • Invoices will be the Consultant Team standard invoice format, submitted electronically. Budget assumes eight(8)invoices and status reports over the project duration. • All meeting notes will be in a bulleted format and limited to a summary of the meeting discussion,decisions made, and action items. • Project Check-in Meeting agendas will be emailed to the client one business day before the meeting and meeting notes will be emailed to the City within 5 business days after meetings. • Check-in meetings with the Consultant team project manager will be held either face to face or via webinar depending on status of state meeting restrictions due to the coronavirus. Deliverables • Monthly Invoices and Status Report(email PDF). • Project Schedule and Schedule updates(email PDF). • Meeting agendas,notes, and list of action items for kick-off meetings and each monthly check-in meeting (PDF) Task 200: Data Collection Objective: This task focuses on collecting data needed to conduct the rate study and complete the stormwater comprehensive plan. Consultant Services The Consultant Team will compile a list of data needed for this project,including GIS data,maintenance or inventory records,procedural documents,reports,etc. including but not limited to the following items: • Stormwater Utility Assets within the City's geographical area covered by the MS4 Permit and/or by Underground Injection Control(UIC)Rule as well as any other assets that will be funded by the Stormwater utility (this is part of the Task 300B Gap Analysis and Task 300C Prioritize and Estimate Stormwater Improvement Project Cost). • UIC Well Data including existing City well assessments including point-rating values,categories, and category definitions(this is part of the Task 300B Gap Analysis and Task 300C Prioritize and Estimate Stormwater Improvement Project Cost). • Capital Improvement and Small Works Projects Information including estimated costs, schedule for design and construction, location, existing CIP list, and drainage complaint data. In addition,construction cost fees from other projects may be requested to inform future cost estimates associated with the City's Capital Improvement and Small Works Projects as part of their Stormwater utility (this is part of the Task 300C Prioritize and Estimate Stormwater Improvement Project Cost). • Land Cover, Zoning, and Traffic Data and any other information related to future customer growth forecasting, planning, or report documentation (this is part of the Task 400A Determine Revenue Requirements). 41Page City of Spokane Valley Stormwater Comprehensive Plan and Rate Study Scope of Work • Gap Analysis Information previously completed by the City, any procedural Level of Service reporting information (this is part of the Task 300B Gap Analysis). • Operation and Maintenance Data describing current practices and Full-Time Employee (FTE) needs to perform the Level(s) of Service desired by the City (this is part of the Task 300B Gap Analysis). The data collected will be reviewed by the Consultant Team and an inventory will be created. Gaps will be identified and documented, and an approach for addressing the gaps will be discussed with the City as part of this task. Client Responsibilities • Provide requested data within the agreed upon schedule. Assumptions • The process and results for the work conducted during this task will be summarized in Chapters 1,2, and 3,of the Stormwater Comprehensive Plan. • Drainage complaint data will be used to inform the recommended prioritization of the City's existing stormwater CIP project list and other stormwater improvement projects(as part of Task 400),however it will not be used to create or develop new CIP or stormwater improvement projects. Deliverables • Data Inventory (PDF and Excel) Task 300: Data Evaluation, Gap Analysis, and Cost Evaluations Objective: This task focuses on evaluating and analyzing data(from Task 200) needed to conduct the rate study and complete the stormwater comprehensive plan, including the gap analysis, and cost evaluations of City provided stormwater CIP projects. Task 300A: Stormwater Asset Data Evaluation and Review This task includes reviewing the City's existing inventory of stormwater assets including UICs within the City Limits. This information will be used to estimate long-term staffing and resource needs for managing the stormwater utility. This task also focuses on reviewing the City's existing stormwater systems and UICs to identify drainage areas of concern or priority areas for treatment. A synthesized list of the drainage areas of concern will be developed based on drainage complaint records,public comment, and information from City staff. The task is anticipated to include the following: • Review Inventory of Stormwater Assets o Review the City's existing GIS data and/or spreadsheet data gaps of stormwater assets. A recommendation will be made for collecting additional data. Stormwater assets to be reviewed include the following: • Storm drains • Manholes and catch basins 51Page City of Spokane Valley Stormwater Comprehensive Plan and Rate Study Scope of Work • Ditch and culvert conveyance systems • UIC Drywells and other infiltration facilities • Stormwater BMPs • Inventory gaps • Review Drainage Areas of Concern o The Consultant team will review "drainage areas of concern"through interviews with City staff and information from the data analysis (Task 200),expected to include drainage complaint records and public comments. Following the interviews,the Consultant team will confirm the list of up to 25 potential CIP projects (provided by the City). A table summarizing the potential projects will be developed and will include the following information: • CIP Project Summary: A summary will be developed including location,date(s) and type of stormwater feature (i.e.,culvert,drywell,BMP,catch basin,etc.),prior mitigation attempts,and the source of the information. • New Potential Projects: Any new potential CIP projects identified as a result of this work will be listed in the table and a recommended for future CIP development. Cost estimates will be based on projects of similar size or type. o Develop an 1 1x17 City-wide map that identifies all drainage areas of concern. o During a monthly check-in meeting with the City,the Consultant team will review and confirm the areas of concern identified, and which should be included in the stormwater comprehensive plan(Task 500). • QA/QC Review o Complete QA/QC review of recommendations memo,resource estimate,synthesized list of drainage areas of concern. Client Responsibilities • Provide (up to)25 potential stormwater CIP projects • Review and provide comments on GIS map within the agreed upon schedule • Provide existing GIS data and/or spreadsheet inventories of stormwater assets and list of gaps Assumptions • The process and results for the work conducted during this task will be summarized in Chapter 3 of the stormwater comprehensive plan. • Drainage complaint data will be used to inform the recommended prioritization of the City's existing stormwater CIP project list and other stormwater improvement projects(as part of Task 400),however it will not be used to create or develop new CIP or stormwater improvement projects or develop cost estimates. • Final copies of the map will be included in the stormwater comprehensive plan. Deliverables • Draft and final memorandum of recommendations for gaps in inventory of stormwater assets (Word and PDF) • One (1) 11x17 map showing City-wide drainage areas of concern. 61Page City of Spokane Valley Stormwater Comprehensive Plan and Rate Study Scope of Work Task 300B: Gap Analysis and Level of Service Evaluation The Consultant Team will assess the City's current Stormwater Management Program Plan (SWMP) for compliance to the 2019-2024 MS4 Permit. Specifically,the Consultant team will conduct a gap analysis by comparing the SWMP to the MS4 Permit,UIC Rule, and the level of service goals defined by the City, to determine areas where improvements and specific actions to meet compliance may be needed and to determine the resources needed to operate and maintain the stormwater utility. Information that will be collected for the assessment includes interviewing City staff and collecting and reviewing relevant documents/records.To complete the gap analysis,the Consultant team will review the compliance checklist that was developed by the City for completeness, then verify and build on that checklist to complete this task. • Gap Analysis Kick-Off Meeting o The Consultant team Project Manager and Gap Analysis Lead will prepare for and attend one (1)gap analysis kick-off meeting. o The purpose of this meeting is for the Consultant team to meet with the City Program Leads to prepare them for the gap analysis. This is expected to include: presenting an overview of the gap analysis process and schedule;providing the program leads with the compliance check-list relevant to their depaitnient;requesting needed documents and records; scheduling interviews with each program lead, and deadlines for providing documents and records. o Materials to be developed for these meetings include an agenda, final list of documents and records needed, final compliance checklist for each program lead,project schedule,meeting notes, and an action item list. • Identify Planning Criteria o Identify and summarize applicable requirements within the Stormwater Management Manual for Eastern Washington(including the UIC Rule),the Spokane Regional Stormwater Manual (SRSM),and City ordinances. This will include developing a summary of the relevant requirements which will be used guide the comprehensive plan. o Meet with the City to identify additional requirements, service level goals relative to the different elements of the stormwater program,a range of effort for each element of the program,or needs that will be addressed with the Stormwater Comprehensive Plan. These will be identified during the Project Kick-Off Meeting. o Additional planning criteria will be identified by completing the MS4 permit compliance checklist and gap analysis(see tasks below). • Customize Compliance Questionnaire/Checklist o The Consultant team has developed a permit compliance questionnaire and checklist that summarizes requirements in the EWA MS4 2019-2024 Permit coverage area. Following the project kick-off meeting the Consultant team will update to the document to include applicable UIC rule requirements as well as the City's level of service goals as needed to align with the City's goals and priorities for the project o The questionnaire/checklist will cover the items identified during the kickoff meeting along with the following program components from the City's MS4 permit: • General Requirements • S5.B.1 Public Education and Outreach(E&O) • S5.B2 Public Involvement and Participation 71Page City of Spokane Valley Stormwater Comprehensive Plan and Rate Study Scope of Work • S5.B.3 Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination(IDDE) • S5.B.4 Construction Site Stormwater Runoff Control • S5.B.5 Post Construction Stormwater Management for New Development and Redevelopment • S5.B.6 Municipal Operations and Maintenance (O&M) • S8.Monitoring and Assessment • S9. Reporting and Record Keeping • UIC Rule (WAC 173-218) • Coverage of areas identified as MS4 or UIC by the City • Collect Documents and Records o Identify and collect documents and records needed to complete the compliance checklist, as needed. The draft list of needed documents and records will be provided at the Project Kick- Off meeting as needed. This list may include but not be limited to the following: • Past Stormwater Management Plan(s) and Annual Reports • Notifications of non-compliance • Interlocal agreements • Standard Operating Procedures(SOPS) • Program description documents: Stormwater Design/O&M Manuals,etc. • Effectiveness Study Documents • Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) • Spokane Regional Stormwater Manual(SRSM) and/or the Ecology Stormwater Management Manual for Eastern Washington(SWMMEW) • SWPPP for City sites • Stormwater Related Standard Details • Public Education and Outreach Materials • GIS database of stormwater facilities: storm drain systems,outfalls,BMPs,etc. • Maintenance Records • City Staff Training Records • Construction Site Project Files • Spokane Valley Street Standards(SVSS) o Develop an inventory of the documents and records collected. • Interview Program Leads o Interview City personnel who are the program leads for different elements of MS4 and UIC Rule compliance, as well as desired level of service for the stormwater utility to provide for those aspects of the utility that are not governed by the MS4 Permit or the UIC Rule,or aspects for which the City needs a higher level of service than required. Interviews will cover all elements of permit compliance that are under the lead's authority. The following leads are expected to be interviewed: • The City's Stormwater Manager • Operations and Maintenance Lead • Education& Outreach(E&O)Lead • New development/redevelopment(post construction) Lead • Construction Lead • Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination (IDDE)Lead 81Page City of Spokane Valley Stormwater Comprehensive Plan and Rate Study Scope of Work • Monitoring and Assessment Lead o Develop interview notes on the components discussed in the interviews. o Conduct follow-up interviews if necessary • Additional Maintenance Staff Interview Questions o During the interview with City maintenance staff(responsible for maintaining the existing stormwater system) additional questions will also be asked to collect the following information: • List of responsibilities of maintenance crew for covering maintenance needs beyond what is required for compliance with the MS4 permit or UIC rule. • List and description of known drainage areas of concern or other types of problem areas that may need to be addressed as part of the comprehensive plan and rate study. • Review Documentation and Complete Compliance Checklist o Review documents and records collected during the documentation collection portion of this task. This will include reviewing and confirming the information provided in the compliance checklist the City has developed. o Evaluate program components identified in the Compliance Questionnaire and Checklist compared to the City's current municipal code to assess permit compliance. For each section and subsection of the MS4 permit,the following information will be entered into the compliance checklist: • Summary of existing and planned activities associated with compliance. For planned activities,the planned date for implementation will also be noted. • Rating of program's permit requirement coverage, rated as "none", "partial", "meets", or "exceeds" • Description of program gap • List of responsible staff • Estimated annual staffing needs and other resources associated with permit requirement. Staffing needs will be estimated as the number of full-time employees(FTEs)required to meet permit requirements. • Each program component requirement will be categorized by the following six types to assist with organizing gaps and recommendations: — Data Management—Requirements regarding the collection of sets of information such as monitoring,mapping,water quality,etc. — Policy Development&Implementation—Requirements regarding utility and/or City procedures,ordinances,municipal code,new and redevelopment requirements,LID, etc. as well as a schedule for implementation — Training—Requirements regarding education of staff,businesses, and public — Documentation—Requirements regarding the submittal of documents/reports to Ecology and/or the creation of documents/reports for internal use or distribution to the public — Record Keeping—Requirements to retain information,records, and forms — Operations& Maintenance—Requirements for the physical operation and maintenance of structural stormwater system elements 91Page City of Spokane Valley Stormwater Comprehensive Plan and Rate Study Scope of Work o Create inventory of City resources required for implementing the new Comprehensive Plan and identify additional needed resources. This may include personnel and financial resources as well as office equipment, field and monitoring equipment, and operations and maintenance equipment. • Develop Resource Estimate o Using the results of the MS4 permit and UIC Rule gap analysis and the recommendations for the City's inventory of stormwater assets developed in this task,develop an estimate of annual resources including FTEs and equipment needed to complete the duties of the Stormwater Utility. The FTE estimate will include the number of FTEs needed to accomplish the following: • Meeting MS4 permit and UIC Rule requirements • Maintaining stormwater assets not regulated by the MS4 permit and/or the UIC Rule • Responding to public drainage complaints,requests for information, and other interactions with the public • Managing design and construction of City stormwater projects • Supervision of full-time employees and temporary seasonal staff • Securing funding for the Stormwater Utility through grant applications or other methods • Completing new Stormwater Utility responsibilities(e.g. UIC well rehabilitation,etc.) • Anticipated increase in FTEs needed during a 20-year planning horizon using a multiplier based on City growth projections o Provide recommendations for the City's inventory of stormwater assets that can be used for estimating maintenance staffing and equipment needs. The recommendations may include the following information: • Total length of linear assets(pipes,ditches,etc.) • Total number of point assets(manholes,catch basins,BMPs,etc.) • Maintenance frequency for each type of asset • Staffing (FTEs)needed to manage each type of asset • Type of equipment needed to maintain each asset • Gap Analysis and Recommendations for Improvement o Compare the MS4 permit requirements and UIC Rule guidance in the compliance checklist to the information collected about the City's existing SWMP,Municipal Code,or ordinances to identify gaps in permit compliance. Identify and develop a summary of each gap and areas for improvement. o Assess and define the up to two options for the desired level of service (from program lead interviews, and discussions with City staff)to be provided by the stormwater utility. For example manage the entire geographical area following the MS4 Permit or a separate area managed by the UIC Rule and the MS4 Permit. o Develop a plan and schedule (table format) for implementing improvements. Possible improvement recommendations may include updates to City ordinances,modifications to the O&M program,increased monitoring,changes to record keeping procedures, and other improvements that may help with improving permit compliance. o Identify resources needed for implementing improvements including funding,FTEs required, and equipment and specific resources needed to manage the range of levels of service considered as part of this task. 101Page City of Spokane Valley Stormwater Comprehensive Plan and Rate Study Scope of Work • Record Keeping Recommendations o During interview with Program Leads,questions will be asked about existing processes for collecting and maintaining permit required records as well as existing processes for conducting related work. o Using the information collected,draft flow chart(s)will be developed that outline the existing processes and draft recommended processes. Follow up meetings with Program Leads will be scheduled via webinar or phone call to confirm the existing process and review/collect their feedback on the recommended processes. o Feedback collected will be incorporated into the flow charts which will be submitted with the draft report(Task 500) for review. • QA/QC Review o Complete QA/QC review of compliance checklist,improvement plan,flow chart(s), and Resource estimate. Client Responsibilities • Provide the requested documents,records,and information for the Consultant Team to complete the compliance checklist within an agreed-upon timeline after receiving the Consultant Team's request for information. • The City is responsible for coordinating with the Program Leads to identify all the staff that need to attend interviews to address questions that focus on the specific section(s)of the permit under the Program Leads authority. • The City will use track changes,mark-up, and/or comment options in Excel or a PDF compatible program to provide comments on draft deliverables. • Review project deliverables and provide one consolidated list of review comments on the project shared site for the Consultant Team within the agreed-upon time frame. • The City Project Manager will review comments provided by City staff and identify which comments the Consultant team will address as well as provide proposed resolution for conflicting comments. • Attend interviews with program leads. Assumptions • The Consultant team will set up a OneDrive or SharePoint project site for sharing project documents with the City or use a site setup by the City. • This work contract for Task 300B will not include any field assessments or inspections. • Interviews will be scheduled by the Consultant team with each program lead and relevant staff to focus on the specific section(s)of the permit under the program leads authority.If follow-up questions are needed with the program lead,they will be conducted over the phone. • Meetings and interviews will be held either face to face or via webinar depending on status of state meeting restrictions due to the coronavirus. • The budget for the Consultant team to collect and review the City's documentation and complete the compliance checklist assume that documentations(documents and records)provided by the City are complete (contain the information needed to complete the checklist),readable,in an electronic format that is searchable, and organized in a way that is efficient for obtaining information(e.g. organized by type of document, City depait,uent,date collected,etc.). After receiving the City's documentation,if more time is needed for organizing or sorting documents, the Consultant team will set up a meeting with the City to discuss the document(s) and determine 111Page City of Spokane Valley Stormwater Comprehensive Plan and Rate Study Scope of Work whether the City will complete additional organization work or issue an amendment for the Consultant team to organize the documents. • The Consultant team will use the comment option in Excel or a PDF compatible program to respond to all City comments on draft deliverables. Revisions to draft deliverables will be submitted via email back to the City for official record of how the comments were addressed. • The budget assumes one round of comments from the City on draft deliverables which the Consultant team will incorporate into the final documents. • Gap analysis will not require additional Stormwater Capital Improvement Projects (CIPs)or updates to already developed City provided Capital Improvement Projects (CIPs). Deliverables • Information/Data Requests(email) • Inventory Summarizing Documents and Records Collected and Reviewed(Excel file) • Draft and final compliance questionnaire/checklist(Excel file)with typed interview notes. • Draft and final resource estimate in table format(PDF) • Draft and final tables summarizing the following items organized by permit section(Excel files): o Summary of SWMP gaps for UIC Rule or MS4 Permit o Recommend areas for improvement and schedule for implementation o Summary of existing resources (including costs),resources required,and additional resources needed • The deliverables for this subtask will also be included in Chapters 2, 3, and 5 of the Stormwater Comprehensive Plan(Task 500). Task 300C:Prioritize and Estimate Stormwater Capital Improvement Project Costs This task includes reviewing the City's planned stormwater improvement project list(forecasted capital improvement and small works projects from Task 300A),UIC retrofit plan,and the replacement cost of existing systems. Following the review and assessment, the Consultant team will provide recommendations for construction costs and prioritization to achieve the City's desired level of service, as well as an action plan identifying next steps to implement the stormwater improvement project plan and goals. This information will be documented in the Stormwater Comprehensive Plan and is expected to include: • Assess Cost of Forecasted UIC Retrofit Plans o Review and assess available data(Task 200)provided by the City,including existing UIC well assessment and available local pollutant loading information. The information will be used to complete the following: • Evaluate City UIC Assessment for adequate scoring strategy and provide recommendation regarding proper scoring allowance relative to: — Average Daily Traffic (ADT) Counts — Upstream protections,including the non-endangerment standard — Source control,including zoning • Review City's current long-term strategies and goals relative to point reduction and provide recommendation regarding the proposed strategies including the following specific items: 121Page City of Spokane Valley Stormwater Comprehensive Plan and Rate Study Scope of Work — Total number of points (per the City's UIC well assessment system)for the total number of drywells. — City-wide total average point value. — Target City-wide total average point value (i.e. City-wide average of 3.0 for a low risk of pollutant loading) — Time (in years)to reach goal with specific target point reductions/year — UIC retrofit priority strategy and UIC retrofit overall strategy — Budget estimate per point to reach goal — Project checklists, flow charts,or other resources that assist or guide the City to meet the UIC retrofit project strategy • Evaluate Replacement Cost of Existing Systems o Review and assess available data provided by the City (Task 200),including available costs from City records for replacement of existing stormwater systems (assets including collection conveyance,UIC wells,or other stormwater facilities),and assess the impacts that high-level changes may have on future cost forecasts and whether or when stormwater facilities could be upgraded,replaced,or added based on high/medium/low categorization of specific projects or types of projects. The information will be used to complete the following: ■ Evaluation of existing systems,which may include: — Existing asset condition data provided by the City(Task 200) — Inspection and/or maintenance records of stormwater assets — Determining the amount of affected assets and their level of priority,based on specific criteria developed with input from the City. This will include developing a rubric or decision flow-chart of critical variables such as age,materials,number of reported drainage issues,etc. to determine both the likelihood and consequences of failure as well as estimate sizing for retrofits or new systems. — Provide recommendations for prioritization of future stormwater system improvement programs ■ Determine a strategy for UIC rehabilitation or replacement,which may include consideration of: — Pentagons — Non-standard structures — Failing UICs (holding water) — Visual inspection indicators — Time-in-service • Recommend strategy for other facilities, including: — BMPs — Catch basins — Stormwater Pipes — Culverts — Pump Stations • Develop an annual budget for existing system replacement including: 131Page City of Spokane Valley Stormwater Comprehensive Plan and Rate Study Scope of Work — Timeline for expected full-system replacement — Projected costs considering future inflation timeline — Level of Service-based replacement • Cost of Forecasted Capital Improvement and Small Works Projects o Review and assess available data(Task 200)provided by the City,including available costs from City records for past or planned capital improvement and/or small works projects, and project schedules. The projects will be identified as "compliance"or"improvement"projects as part of this work. The information will be used to complete the following: • Assess planned CIP street projects (from the City's existing TIP)and opportunities to include the following as part of the street projects: — UIC retrofit strategy and plan — UIC rehabilitation and replacement strategy — Other stormwater facility rehabilitation and replacement strategy(s) — Service contract comments identifying stormwater improvements(within project limits) — Percentage cost of stormwater improvements associated with past street projects for future forecasting • Review and estimate costs and schedule of City's existing identified Stormwater Improvement projects(up to 25 projects) • Assess City's Small Works projects roster and annual budget needs and schedules(up to two scenarios,e.g. short-term and long-term),consistent with the Level-of-Service identified in Task 200C including the following components: — Service contract comments identifying stormwater improvements(city-wide) — Fixed budgeting consideration and determination(e.g. $200-300k per 1-2-year period) — Maximum threshold definition for small works protocols • Prioritize Stormwater Improvement Projects o Develop a rubric,with input from the City,to prioritize projects using the categories below, which will be used to give each CIP project a normalized score with a maximum possible score of 100 points consistent with the City's current scoring system. • Construction cost(where appropriate,construction costs may be based on percentage estimates for local costs of stormwater work related to larger construction efforts) • 20-year maintenance cost • Risk of continued drainage issues • Public benefit • Compliance with stormwater requirements • Planning-level pre-design requirements o The information from the above subtasks will be consolidated into a single table and will include the following information: • Project name and ID number • Project location within an I Ix17 vicinity map • Project description(1-2 sentences) 141Page City of Spokane Valley Stormwater Comprehensive Plan and Rate Study Scope of Work ■ Construction cost-estimates provided by the City (Task 200),with percentage-based estimates of contingency, sales tax,fees for design,survey,permitting, and construction management, if needed, and future cost forecasting based on anticipated project construction timeline o Meet with the City during a project check-in meeting to review the prioritization results from and update the project rankings based on input from the City. • QA/QC Review o Complete QA/QC review of stormwater improvement project prioritization and cost estimate and forecasting. Client Responsibilities • Review and provide input on the selection/prioritization of CIPs and GIS maps within the agreed upon schedule Assumptions • Maps and flow charts completed during this project will be incorporated into the comprehensive plan. • Stormwater modeling and pollutant loading are not included in this scope of work. Facility retrofits will be sized generically based on the City's UIC well assessment system. • Sizing of assets will not be provided. CIP costs will be approximate and use comparable based on catchment area or other relative measure. • Drainage complaint data will be used to inform evaluation process,however it will not be used to create or develop new CIP or stormwater improvement projects. Development of additional CIPs will be considered additional services. • Asset replacement costs will be provided at a programmatic level for each of the asset types. Targeted replacement dates for specific individual assets will not be provided. Deliverables • Summary table of CIP projects with cost and recommended prioritization (PDF). • The deliverables for this subtask will be included in Chapters 2, 3, and 6 of the Stormwater Comprehensive Plan(Task 500). Task 400: Prepare Rate Study Objective: This task focuses on completing a stormwater fee rate study including data collection, developing a policy framework, determining revenue and level-of-service requirements, and developing recommendations for updated stormwater fee rates. The Consultant team will facilitate the coordination and review work as described in this task, and the Rate Study Lead will complete the rate study components as described in Exhibit A. • Rate Study Kick-Off Meeting o Prepare for and attend one (1)rate study kick-off meeting. o The purpose of this meeting is for the Consultant Team to meet with the City Project Manager to prepare them for the scope and process of conducting the rate study. 151Page City of Spokane Valley Stormwater Comprehensive Plan and Rate Study Scope of Work o An initial project meeting will be scheduled with the City,the Consultant Team Project Manager and Rate Study Lead to confirm an understanding of the rate study's goals, objectives, and potential issues and concerns(from all parties), as well as identify the information the Consultant team will need to conduct the rate study. • Public Meeting o Prepare for and attend one (1) in-person public meeting. • The purpose of this public meeting is to update the public about the project status and obtain feedback from the public on the proposed changes to the stormwater fee rates. The meeting will be hosted by the Rate Study Lead and the Consultant Team Project Manager. • The format for this meeting will be in person. The meeting recording and materials will be posted on the City website for an online comment period,described below in this task. • Materials to be developed and presented to the public include: - An announcement for the newspaper regarding the meeting purpose,time, and location. - A PowerPoint presentation to summarize the new stormwater rates and the findings of the comprehensive plan (created by the Consultant team). - A four-page flier with information about the project and the project status, the timeline for the new stormwater rates to be implemented, and an aerial map with the proposed study area. The flier will also include discussion about the benefits of the rate increase to the public. • Online Comment Period o The Consultant team will develop materials and the City will post the materials on a website for a 30-day public comment period. These materials will include the proposed rate increases and Level of Service plans. o Follow up work includes consolidating public comments into a table format and developing draft responses to the comments. • City Council Meeting o The purpose of this meeting is to update the City Council about the project status and obtain feedback on the proposed changes to the stormwater fee rates as well as the proposed stormwater comprehensive plan. o The format for this meeting is anticipated to be in-person,but may be changed to an online format depending on the status of the state meeting restrictions due to the coronavirus. o The Consultant team will work with City staff on preparing rate study presentation materials for a City Council meeting.The presentation will present study findings, allowing City Council members to be better equipped to make decisions that are to the benefit of the long- term health of the utility. o Attend and present at one (1) City Council meeting regarding the following: • Revenue requirements identified during the study. • Rate design alternatives and proposed rates. 161Page City of Spokane Valley Stormwater Comprehensive Plan and Rate Study Scope of Work Assumptions • Rate Study Kick Off Meeting participants could include a representative from departments that can address issues related to finance,engineering,operations,customer service (if applicable) and administration. Additional City staff participants will be identified during a monthly check-in meeting with the City. • The Kick Off Meeting, Open House and Council Meeting will be attended by the Consultant Team Project Manager,Rate Study Task Lead and Gap Analysis Lead. Client Responsibilities • Attend project meetings • Organize, schedule, and host the City Council Meeting • Review and provide comment on the Consultant Team deliverables within the agreed upon schedule Task 500: Develop Stormwater Comprehensive Plan and Rate Study Objective: This task focuses on developing a written summary of the work complete, the process for making decisions during this study including recommendations and an execution plan. The outline of chapters and chapter content is summarized in Table 2. These chapters will be written as the associated work is completed in the subsequent tasks. This task also includes work associated with developing education and outreach materials about the revised stormwater rates. Consultant Services Task 500A:Draft and Final Comprehensive Plan This task includes developing and writing the content for the draft and final versions of the Stormwater Comprehensive Plan and Rate Study. • Execution Plan and Next Steps o In coordination with the City,create a plan for developing and executing the CIP recommendations including how and when the work could be phased as well as funding sources identified in the rate study (Task 400). o Provide a summary and discussion of issues and observations made during the project that may need action in the future but were out of scope or beyond the scope of the current project to be completed. This summary will be incorporated into the Comprehensive Plan. • Develop Comprehensive Plan o Develop a draft and final version of the stormwater comprehensive plan as outlined in Table 2. o Submit the draft comprehensive plan to the City for review. o Address City comments in the draft comprehensive plan and submit the final version incorporating updates based on comments. 171Page City of Spokane Valley Stormwater Comprehensive Plan and Rate Study Scope of Work Task 500B:Develop Education and Outreach Materials This task includes creating education and outreach materials to inform the public about the stormwater rate increases and the Stormwater Comprehensive Plan and Rate Study. The material content will include information about the reason for rate increases and how the Stormwater Utility benefits the public. Materials will include the following: o Online material: Summary of comprehensive plan findings,proposed CIP projects,other benefits provided by the Stormwater utility(e.g.,operations and maintenance,response to stormwater problem areas,etc.),proposed rate increases. o Fact Sheet: Brief summary of key comprehensive plan findings and updated stormwater utility rates with direction to City's website for additional information and feedback opportunities. Table 2: Summary of Stormwater Comprehensive Plan Chapters Chapter Title and Description Draft Final Fact Sheet Purpose: Provide an overview of the study, key outcomes, plans for future work, and overview of the comprehensive plan contents. Chapter 1. Introduction and Planning Criteria Purpose: Provide background information on the comprehensive plan, an overview of goals,and outline how goals will be achieved. Chapter 2. Gap Analysis and Stormwater Utility Management Purpose: Summarize the results of the MS4 permit compliance gap analysis and recommendations for improvements and resources needed to comply with all permit and UIC Rule requirements. Summarize all other responsibilities of the Stormwater Utility and resources needed to accomplish those responsibilities. Chapter 3. Existing Stormwater System Purpose: High level description of existing stormwater system including conveyance systems and stormwater facilities. Describe drainage areas of concern that were identified, solution alternatives, and potential for addressing drainage problems as part of a small works, CIP, UIC retrofit, or standalone stormwater improvement project. Chapter 4. Financing and Rates Purpose:Provide an overview of all work completed in the rate study including data collection, developing a policy framework, determining revenue and level-of- service requirements,and developing recommendations for updated stormwater fee rates. Chapter 5. Level of Service Purpose: Describe the scenarios and range of effort considered as part of the level of service evaluation including goals for level of service to be provided,the desired level of service, and the level of service provided for areas covered by the MS4 Permit or the UIC Rule. 181Page City of Spokane Valley Stormwater Comprehensive Plan and Rate Study Scope of Work Chapter Title and Description Draft Final Chapter 6. Execution Plan and Next Steps Purpose: Describe the implementation plan for all actions identified in the comprehensive plan including implementation of new stormwater fee rates, and schedule for constructing CIP projects and implementing other work identified during this study. This chapter will also include recommendations for projects that are potential candidates for grant awards. Client Responsibilities • Review the documents within the agreed upon schedule. • Use the track changes and comment options in Word to provide consolidated comments and suggested revisions in a single document. Assumptions • The Consultant Team will use the comment option to respond to all comments or revisions in Word and address recommended changes using the track changes option. • The revised chapters will be submitted Microsoft OneDrive (with track changes turned on and comment responses)back to the City for the official record of how the comments were addressed. In addition,the Consultant Team will also email a clean copy of the chapter to the City. • Maps and flow charts completed during this project will be incorporated into the comprehensive plan. Deliverables • Draft and Final Fact Sheet(Word and PDF). • Comment responses addressing City comments on Draft report chapters • Draft and Final copies of each report chapter(Word and PDF). Task 600 Manager's Reserve Objective: This task includes additional funds for work that may be requested during the project duration, beyond this scope, to allow the City an opportunity to avoid returning to City Council for additional budget approval. Consultant Services This task includes additional funds for work that will be engaged only with prior written authorization by the City beyond the scope and fees in described in Tasks 100-500 of this contract. This work is limited to a maximum of$10,000 and may include items such as: • Grant Writing Support • Additional E&O Materials • Out of scope work added during project 191Page City of Spokane Valley Stormwater Comprehensive Plan and Rate Study Scope of Work Project Schedule and Fees The proposed project schedule and proposed fees are summarized in Table 3 and Table 4 respectively.The project schedule will be further developed and finalized during the project kick-off meeting. Table 3: Proposed Project Schedule Task Task Title Anticipated Dates 100 Project Management&Administration April—October 200 Data Collection April—May 300 Data Evaluation, Gap Analysis, and Cost Evaluations May—June 400 Prepare Rate Study June—July 500 Develop Stormwater Comprehensive Plan and Rate Study July- September 600 Manager's Reserve N/A Table 4: Summary of Fees by Task Task Task Title Fees 100 Project Management&Administration $24,616 200 Data Collection $6,560 300 Data Evaluation, Gap Analysis, and Cost Evaluations $101,792 400 Prepare Rate Study $79,732 500 Develop Stormwater Comprehensive Plan and Rate Study $59,912 600 Manager's Reserve $10,000 Total $282,612 201Page EXHIBIT A - FCS GROUP'S SCOPE OF WORK Task 1—Initial project meeting An initial on-site project meeting (or remote meeting if necessary)will be scheduled to obtain an understanding of the study's goals, objectives, and potential issues and concerns (from both parties). Discussion topics could include the following: • Fiscal policies—The rate study will include recommended policies for ongoing reserve levels, capital funding, repair and replacement funding, etc. Task 2—Data collection Data collection will include a Word-formatted document that will be provided to OCI for distribution to City staff before the initial project meeting. It will outline key information required to complete the tasks outlined in the proposed work plan, such as: 1. Cost of forecasted capital improvement projects. 2. Cost of forecasted UIC retrofit plan. 3. Cost of forecasted Small Works projects. 4. Evaluate replacement cost of existing systems. Consultant shall propose a methodology for evaluation. 5. Maintenance costs related to future infrastructure growth regulated by the City's municipal stormwater permit. 6. Maintenance costs related to future infrastructure growth regulated by the UIC program. 7. Future customer growth 8. Narrative description of existing program level of service. Task 3—Prepare Rate Study Task 3a- Determine revenue requirements The revenue requirement is defined as the total amount of rate revenue needed to meet an enterprise's financial obligations, including capital, operating, and policy-driven commitments. Using an Excel spreadsheet model, we will project operations and capital revenue requirements for a 10-year period. The model will be constructed with user-friendliness in mind and will accommodate user-entry of key data and assumptions. The financial plan will include Stormwater Management Fund 402 and will allow for the inclusion of costs now recovered through the Spokane County Aquifer Protection Area fee and deposited into the Aquifer Protection Fund 403. The model will be flexible and stable enough to analyze multiple scenarios and/or levels of service. 1. The long-range financial forecast shall span ten (10)years. 2. Include yearly cash flows; forecasted revenues and expenditures; maintenance costs; and capital project costs. 3. Identify revenue requirement assumptions including general and construction cost inflation; personnel costs; fund earnings; customer growth; and debt assumptions. It is understood that capital projects will likely be funded on a pay- as-you-go basis,without the use of debt. 4. Make recommendations on the structure of Stormwater Management Fund(s), Attachment A—Scope of Work Page 1 of 3 currently Fund 402. Include recommendations on rate funded system reinvestment requirements; target utility reserves; and fund minimum balance requirements. 5. Evaluate revenue sufficiency. 6. The recommended rate structure shall be planned for six (6) years with recommendations on future increases. The revenue requirement results may be presented in a matrix format, describing service level options by program component, and corresponding rates. An example is provided below. Task 3b-Cost of service The cost-of-service analysis establishes both (1) a defensible basis for assigning "cost shares," and (2) "equity" for system customers based on industry standard methodologies that are tailored to the City's unique characteristics. This analytical exercise will allow for alternative rate structures to be calculated and considered. An alternative rate structure could include separating the rate two components: (1) a per account component to recover costs that do not vary by the imperviousness of the parcel and (2) an impervious-based component similar to the City's existing approach.The results may indicate shifts in cost recovery that could improve equity relative to the existing rate structure. 1. Develop a fair and equitable allocation of costs to allow for the consideration of alternative rate structure(s) 2. Discuss options and considerations for revising the rate structure 3. Provide a summary of the average unit costs (cost-based rates) Task 3c—Review and Update Existing Surface Water Management Rates Develop cost-based rate options based on the City stormwater program as it relates to growth. Include increased maintenance costs and capital plans related to the growth in the infrastructure and changes to the general municipal permit and UIC program requirements. Applying the revenue requirement results and the customer information. Rate structure options could include the following: 'Across the Board': Apply rate adjustments equally to the existing structure • 'Cost of Service': Apply rate components such as a fixed rate per account and an impervious- based rate to align rates with an equitable share of utility costs Surface Water Program Component Service Level Capital Maintenance Water Quality Public Education Administration Drainage WQ!Habitat System Rehab Limited Repair Reactive System Minimum General Fund Status Quo Existing Unfunded Projects Maintenance Regulatory Existing Transfers;Billing& Requirements Collection SS S SS s S SS Fix Severe Grant Funded Repair Some With Maintenance at Minimum General Fund Proactive Problems Only Proactive Rehab Prescribed Regulatory Existing Transfers;Billing& Frequencies Requirements Collection SSS S SS SSS S S SS Fix Severe and Grant Funded Full Asset Full Asset Forecasted General Fund Optimal Moderate Problems and City Funding Management Management Regulatory Expanded Program Transfers;Billing& Requirements Collection SSSS sss ssss ssss ss ss SS Attachment A—Scope of Work Page 2 of 3 Task 3d—Draft Report, Meetings, and Presentations Provide a draft report of the study. The draft report will document the rate study process, methodology, key assumptions, and results and recommendations. A summary of key model spreadsheets (in excel format)will be included in the report technical appendix. We will also deliver a final copy of the Excel-based spreadsheet models for City use.The models will provide for 1) evaluation of revenue and cost changes on rates, 2) analysis of fiscal policy implementation options, 3) analysis of changes in economic and financial indicators,4) rate smoothing, and 5)variances to other key rate study inputs including the capital plan, the operating budget, customer information, etc. Assume up to six(6)virtual meetings in addition to the initial project meeting.These meetings are to present the study to City staff and to discuss comments.The City anticipates multiple discussions at varying times. Task 3e-Workshops, meeting and public hearings Work with City staff on preparing rate study presentation materials and presenting materials at up to two (2) remote and two (2) on-site public workshops, Council meetings and/or public hearings. Presentation materials will include a comparison of stormwater rates with other Eastern Washington jurisdictions of similar size. The material to be presented will likely also include the following: • The review of revenue requirements and cost of service • The review of the rate design • The proposed rates • Other items as required Task 4—Final Study Based on direction after the completion of the public meetings (from Task 3e), make revisions to the report as directed and provide the final rate study report. By waiting to finalize the report until after receiving comments from the public meetings,we can ensure that the final report reflects comments from the public and Council, as necessary.The report will reflect what was adopted by City Council, thereby closing the loop between recommendations and Council action. Attachment A—Scope of Work Page 3 of 3 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: May 3, 2022 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ® new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Motion Consideration: Grant Award: Pedestrian & Bicycle Program GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 35.77.010: Six Year Transportation Improvement Program PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: • April 19, 2022 — City Council authorized the City Manager to accept funding from the 2020 Safe Routes to School Program offered by WSDOT for new sidewalks on the east side of Bowdish Rd. between 12th Ave. and 22nd Ave. • June 30, 2020 — City Council authorized the City Manager to apply to the 2020 Safe Routes to School and Pedestrian and Bicycle Program offered by WSDOT. • June 9, 2020—Administrative Report discussing potential projects for PBP and SRTS. BACKGROUND: In July 2020, the City unsuccessfully applied to the Washington State Department of Transportation's (WSDOT) Pedestrian & Bicycle Program (PBP), requesting funding for a pedestrian hybrid beacon crossing of Sprague Ave. at City Hall and Balfour Park. In spring 2022, the Washington state legislature provided an additional $10 million of funding for the PBP and directed WSDOT to award it to projects from the 2020 application list as soon as possible. Given this increased funding, the City's crossing project is now eligible for award. Staff has coordinated with WSDOT and updated the proposed project schedule and budget. The schedule allows for design in 2022 and 2023 while construction would occur in 2024. WSDOT has agreed to cover increased project costs without impacting the City's local contribution amount. The Council authorized local match was for up to $110,000; however, the final grant application required a local match amount of only $96,200. WSDOT's award will cover the estimated cost increases up to the new total cost of$652,600 see below. June 30, 2020 May 3,2022 Council Authorized Amounts Updated Cost Estimate&City Match Project Total Cost Request Local Match Total Cost Award Local Match Sprague Ave. crossing: w550,000 $440,000 $ 110,000 $652,600 $556,400 $96,200 City Hall to Balfour Park Since this application is nearly two years old, staff would like Council to confirm acceptance of the award. OPTIONS: 1) Move to accept the PBP award, 2) take other appropriate action. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to authorize the City Manager, or designee, to accept the Pedestrian & Bicycle Program award for the Sprague Ave. crossing between City Hall and Balfour Park project. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Engineering staff have confirmed with the Finance Dept. that local match is available via REET revenues to satisfy the program's non-federal match. STAFF CONTACT: Adam Jackson, P.E. — Engineer— Planning & Grants ATTACHMENTS: None CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: May 3,2022 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑consent ❑old business ❑new business ❑public hearing ❑information ® admin.report ❑pending legislation ❑executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Administrative report- City Hall update. GOVERNING LEGISLATION: Not applicable. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN:Numerous discussions between Council and staff since early 2018. BACKGROUND: Litigation update: City Hall was completed and occupied in early September 2017 and since that time many significant construction and/or design defects have been discovered. The City hired various consultants to identify the nature and extent of the defects, as well as Shane McFetridge as special legal counsel. The City filed suit in Spokane County Superior Court April 27, 2020 (as the pandemic was starting), naming as defendants alleged to be responsible for the various defects, Meridian Construction (prime contractor), Architects West (architect and project manager), Allwest Testing & Engineering (materials testing), and Eight31 Consulting (owner's representative to assist in overseeing the project). Since suit was filed in April 2020,the parties have engaged in the discovery process, including extensive testing of various systems and areas at City Hall. The parties have agreed that mediation may assist in resolving some or all of the outstanding issues, and the first session was conducted March 17, 2022 with all defendants and most subcontractors taking part. Additional mediation sessions are scheduled for late fall 2022,with benchmarks and intermediate tasks to occur in between in an effort to work toward resolution of the issues. In the event mediation is not successful,trial is set for March 6,2023. It is important to note the City has not waited to conclude the litigation before beginning some of the necessary repairs. To date,the City had micro piles(concrete pillars)installed along the curved wall at the front of the Council Chambers in an effort to stop it from sinking further,installed fire-stopping in the two primary staircases on the north and south ends of the building, and performed extensive repairs on the HVAC system. The City appreciates the public's patience as we work through complex reconstruction issues arising from numerous defects. It has taken quite awhile and will require additional time and patience as we continue to push forward towards resolution in a manner that seeks to hold fully responsible those who created these problems. Expense update: City Council authorized staff to spend up to $500,000 in both 2019 and 2020 for litigation-related expenses including construction, attorney fees, and expert witness fees, through the passage of the budget for those years. The City is approaching that limit, and with activities gearing up relating to the mediation and/or trial, additional budgetary authority will be required to get us through into early 2023. Staff will explain in greater detail during tonight's meeting, what those tentatively projected costs are expected to be. Part of these funds may be used for additional reconstruction work as availability of qualified contractors allows. As noted many times before, the City fully expects to be reimbursed all such costs as part of any settlement or trial verdict. OPTIONS: 1)consensus to include in the 2022 budget amendment, additional expenditures for City Hall litigation which includes, litigation support, project management, and necessary construction, or 2) take other appropriate action. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Consensus to include as part of the 2022 budget amendment, up to an additional $700,000,for a total of$1.7 million related to the City Hall litigation. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: The additional $700,000 includes litigation support, project management,and necessary construction,over the entire four-and-a-half-year history including up through the Spring of 2023. As there are currently no funds appropriated in the 2022 budget for this work, a future budget amendment will be required. These additional funds are anticipated to come from Fund 312. STAFF CONTACT: Bill Helbig, Community&Public Works Director; Shane McFetridge,outside counsel with Randall& Danskin. ATTACHMENTS: Table 1 —Funds Expended to Date Table 2—Anticipated 2022 Fund Needs TABLE 1 - FUNDS EXPENDED TO DATE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA City Hall Evaluation and Repair Costs For the Years of 2019 through 2022 Expended Funds Year Category of Work 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total Contract Attorney Services $ 30,032.30 $ 35,124.60 $ 80,619.06 $ 25,763.45 $ 171,539.41 Architectural & Structural Repairs 144,774.95 289,791.96 215,683.15 31,094.73 681,344.79 General Inspection - 1,238.43 7,561.78 2,166.24 10,966.45 HVAC - 18,206.73 20,386.33 - 38,593.06 Fire Safety Repairs - 7,349.64 25,318.82 1,530.59 34,199.05 Total $ 174,807.25 $ 351,711.36 $ 349,569.14 $ 60,555.01 $ 936,642.76 (1) Costs for 2021 are preliminary and unaudited. (2) Costs for 2022 are as of 4/14/2022. TABLE 2 - ANTICIPATED 2022 FUND NEEDS CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA City Hall Evaluation and Repair Costs Anticipated Funds Required for 2022 Mediation & Negotiations $ 325,000.00 Structural Engineer $ 25,000.00 Cost Estimating Engineer $ 20,000.00 Forensic Architect $ 100,000.00 Litigation Contractor $ 25,000.00 Litigation Attorney $ 100,000.00 Project Manager $ 25,000.00 City Internal Costs $ 30,000.00 Project Mgmt $ 160,000.00 Construction Manager $ 30,000.00 Project Manager $ 65,000.00 Construction Attorney $ 35,000.00 City Internal Costs $ 30,000.00 Construction Costs $ 150,000.00 Stairwell Lids $ 135,000.00 Misc. Construction $ 15,000.00 Total Required Funds $ 635,000.00 Contigency 10% $ 63,500.00 Total w/ Contingency $ 698,500.00 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: May 3, 2022 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ® admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Proposed 2022 Budget Amendment. GOVERNING LEGISLATION: In order for the City to amend an adopted budget, State law requires the Council to approve an ordinance that appropriates additional funds. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: The Council last took formal action on the 2022 Budget when it was adopted on November 9, 2021. BACKGROUND: Since the initial adoption of the 2022 Budget on November 9, 2021, a number of events have transpired that necessitate a 2022 Budget amendment. The proposed budget amendments include: #001 - General Fund The recurring revenues reflect a decrease of$183,000, which is comprised of: • Grant proceeds are decreased by $160,000 to reflect the actual HHAA funds awarded to the City. • $23,000 decrease in Parks and Recreation revenues due to updated estimates for 2022. Provide additional appropriations (expenditures) of$4,369,511 comprised of: • $36,342 increase in salaries, payroll taxes, and benefits costs for the City Council Department related to increased councilmember salaries from the Salary Commission effective April 19, 2022. • A net $0 change in the City Council Department to move the Mayor's travel budget to the appropriate position number. • $55,813 increase in salaries and related payroll taxes and benefits in the City Facilities Department to add a custodian position for City Hall. This position was approved by Council at the December 14, 2021 Council meeting. • $55,813 decrease in janitorial services in the City Facilities Department to account for the hiring of an in-house custodian. • $475,000 increase in code enforcement abatement costs in the Building Department due to several high-cost abatements that have either occurred or are planned in 2022. • A net $175,364 increase across various City Departments due to a reorganization that occurred in early 2022. This reorganization included the addition of one new FTE for a Community and Public Works Director, which was approved by Council at the February 15, 2022 Council meeting. • $89,805 to replenish the Winter Weather Reserve Fund #122 back to a fund balance of $500,000. The Street O&M Fund was over budget on snow removal expenditures in 2021 by about $89,805. • $3,593,000 transferred to Capital Reserve Fund #312 which represents the 2020 yearend fund balance in excess of 50% of recurring expenditures. #104 — Hotel/Motel Tax—Tourism Facilities Fund $273,000 increase in transfers in from the Hotel/Motel Tax Fund #105. This increase reflects a Council motion on December 14, 2021, as part of the lodging tax grant process for the 2022 awards. Page 1 of 3 #105 — Hotel / Motel Tax Fund Net change of $0 in expenditures; however, transfers out to the Hotel / Motel Tax — Tourism Facilities Fund #104 are increased by $273,000 and tourism promotion costs are reduced by $273,000, as was approved during the lodging tax process at the December 14, 2021 Council meeting. #122 —Winter Weather Reserve Fund Revenues are increased by $89,805 reflecting a transfer in from the General Fund #001 to replenish the fund balance to $500,000. The Street O&M Fund was over budget on snow removal expenditures in 2021 by about $89,805, which was reimbursed to Fund #101 from Fund #122 during that year. #303 — Street Capital Projects Fund Revenues and expenditures are proposed to increase by $750,000 to add construction for the Buckeye Ave. Sewer Extension project. This is funded through an allocation of CLFR funds as authorized by Council at the April 19, 2022 Council meeting. #310 — Civic Facilities Capital Proiects Fund Expenditures are increased by $560,000 for the City's contribution to the joint improvement costs of the new library being constructed adjacent to Balfour Park as outlined in the Memorandum of Understanding with the Library District. #312 — Capital Reserve Fund Revenues are increased due to a transfer of $3,593,000 from General Fund #001 which represents the 2020 yearend fund balance in excess of 50% of recurring expenditures. Expenditures are increased by$759,600 for the amount still owing for the purchase of the WSDOT property adjacent to Sullivan Park. The 2022 Budget amendment reflects the changes noted above and will affect 7 funds resulting in total revenue increases of$4,522,805 and expenditure increases of$6,439,111. Revenue Expenditure Fund Fund Increase Increase No. Name (Decrease) (Decrease) 001 General Fund (183,000) 4,369,511 104 Hotel/Motel Tax -Tourism Facilities Fund 273,000 0 105 Hotel/Motel Tax Fund 0 0 122 Winter Weather Reserve Fund 89,805 0 303 Street Capital Projects Fund 750,000 750,000 310 Civic Facilities Capital Projects Fund 0 560,000 312 Capital Reserve Fund 3,593,000 759,600 4,522,805 6,439,111 The 2022 Budget amendment also includes changes to the Employee Position Classification Monthly Salary Schedule to incorporate various changes from the City's reorganization, including the addition of the new Community and Public Works Director position. OPTIONS: Future options are to accept the proposed amendments in whole or in-part. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Staff seek Council consensus to move forward with amendments to the 2022 Budget as presented. If approved, we anticipate the following calendar of events leading to Council approval of the amending ordinance. Page 2 of 3 • May 24, 2022 — Public hearing on the 2022 Budget Amendment. • May 24, 2022 — First reading of Ordinance #22-xxx amending the 2022 Budget. • May 31, 2022 —Second reading of Ordinance #22-xxx amending the 2022 Budget. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Once approved, this action amends the estimated revenues and appropriations for the 2022 Budget that was adopted on November 9, 2021. There are adequate funds available to pay for these amendments. STAFF CONTACT: Chelsie Taylor, Finance Director ATTACHMENTS: • Fund level line-item detail of revenues and expenditures. • Fund summaries for all funds affected by the proposed budget amendment. • Amended salary schedule. Page 3 of 3 P:\Finance\2022 Budget\Budget AmendmentWmendment#1\2022 05 03 Admin Report\2022 Amendment No 1 Detail v1 for RCA CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 5/3/2022 2022 Budget-Amendment#1 Line Item Detail Account Account Initial Amended Description Number Description/Justification Budget Amendment Budget #001 -General Fund Recurring Revenues HHAA Grant-County 001.013.000.337.65.00 - Decrease to actual grant award 260,000 (160,000) 100,000 Splash Down Concessions 001.076.302.362.30.01 - Decrease due to updated expectations 15,000 (15,000) 0 Evergreen Volleyball Assc Fees 001.076.303.347.30.50 - Increase for new contract 3,000 4,000 7,000 CenterPlace Long-Term Rentals 001.076.305.362.50.01 - Decrease due to no longer doing these 12,000 (12,000) 0 Total recurring revenues (183,000) Recurring Expenditures Salaries and Wages-Council 001.011.000.511.60.10.00 -Adjust for Salary Commission increase 123,180 33,420 156,600 Payroll Taxes&Benefits-Council 001.011.000.511.60.20.00 -Adjust for Salary Commission increase 191,390 2,922 194,312 Travel/Mileage Position 4 001.011.000.511.60.43.14 -Adjust travel budget to mayor 8,000 (4,000) 4,000 Travel/Mileage Position 5 001.011.000.511.60.43.15 -Adjust travel budget to mayor 4,000 4,000 8,000 Salaries and Wages-City Manager 001.013.000.513.10.10.00 -Adjust for reorganization 768,433 (190,915) 577,518 Payroll Taxes&Benefits-City Manager 001.013.000.513.10.20.00 -Adjust for reorganization 350,012 (81,504) 268,508 Salaries and Wages-HHS 001.013.000.565.40.10.00 -Adjust for reorganization 93,000 (93,000) 0 Payroll Taxes&Benefits-HHS 001.013.000.565.40.20.00 -Adjust for reorganization 49,460 (49,460) 0 Supplies-HHS 001.013.000.565.40.31.01 -Adjust for reorganization 2,500 (2,500) 0 Professional Services-HHS 001.013.000.565.40.41.05 -Adjust for reorganization 101,000 (101,000) 0 Cell Phones-HHS 001.013.000.565.40.42.03 -Adjust for reorganization 600 (600) 0 Travel/Mileage-HHS 001.013.000.565.40.43.01 -Adjust for reorganization 1,000 (1,000) 0 Shelter Space Rental 001.013.000.565.40.45.00 -Adjust for reorganization 24,000 (24,000) 0 Memberships 001.013.000.565.40.49.02 -Adjust for reorganization 200 (200) 0 Registrations/Training 001.013.000.565.40.49.04 -Adjust for reorganization 1,000 (1,000) 0 Payroll Taxes&Benefits-City Attorney 001.013.015.515.32.20.00 -Adjust for reorganization 179,615 (11,901) 167,714 Salaries and Wages-DCM 001.018.013.513.10.10.00 -Adjust for reorganization 189,082 186,674 375,756 Payroll Taxes&Benefits-DCM 001.018.013.513.10.20.00 -Adjust for reorganization 65,795 62,271 128,066 Salaries and Wages-Finance 001.018.014.514.23.10.00 -Adjust for reorganization 1,057,255 (192,936) 864,319 Payroll Taxes&Benefits-Finance 001.018.014.514.23.20.00 -Adjust for reorganization 482,288 (118,827) 363,461 Supplies-Finance 001.018.014.514.23.31.01 -Adjust for reorganization 3,400 (500) 2,900 Cell Phones-Finance 001.018.014.514.23.42.03 -Adjust for reorganization 3,000 (3,000) 0 Travel/Mileage-Finance 001.018.014.514.23.43.01 -Adjust for reorganization 5,200 (800) 4,400 Copier Maintenance-Finance 001.018.014.514.23.48.02 -Adjust for reorganization 2,400 (200) 2,200 Memberships-Finance 001.018.014.514.23.49.02 -Adjust for reorganization 1,500 (100) 1,400 Registrations-Finance 001.018.014.514.23.49.04 -Adjust for reorganization 11,800 (8,100) 3,700 Page 1 of 6 P:\Finance\2022 Budget\Budget AmendmentWmendment#1\2022 05 03 Admin Report\2022 Amendment No 1 Detail v1 for RCA CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 5/3/2022 2022 Budget-Amendment#1 Line Item Detail Account Account Initial Amended Description Number Description/Justification Budget Amendment Budget #001 -General Fund -continued Recurring Expenditures-continued Salaries and Wages-HR 001.018.016.518.10.10.00 -Adjust for reorganization 212,904 9,626 222,530 Payroll Taxes&Benefits-HR 001.018.016.518.10.20.00 -Adjust for reorganization 89,657 (4,582) 85,075 Salaries and Wages-IT 001.018.017.518.80.10.00 -Adjust for reorganization 0 276,588 276,588 Payroll Taxes&Benefits-IT 001.018.017.518.80.20.00 -Adjust for reorganization 0 113,835 113,835 Supplies-IT 001.018.017.518.80.31.01 -Adjust for reorganization 0 300 300 Small Tools&Minor Equipment-IT 001.018.017.518.80.35.01 -Adjust for reorganization 0 200 200 Cell Phones-IT 001.018.017.518.80.42.03 -Adjust for reorganization 0 3,000 3,000 Travel/Mileage-IT 001.018.017.518.80.43.01 -Adjust for reorganization 0 800 800 Copier Maintenance-IT 001.018.017.518.80.48.02 -Adjust for reorganization 0 200 200 Memberships-IT 001.018.017.518.80.49.02 -Adjust for reorganization 0 200 200 Registrations-IT 001.018.017.518.80.49.04 -Adjust for reorganization 0 8,000 8,000 Salaries and Wages-Facilities 001.033.000.518.30.10.00 -Add custodian position 131,528 40,572 172,100 Payroll Taxes&Benefits-Facilities 001.033.000.518.30.20.00 -Add custodian position 64,092 15,241 79,333 Janitorial Services-Facilities 001.033.000.518.30.41.21 - Decrease due to adding custodian position 80,000 (55,813) 24,187 Salaries and Wages-CPW Admin 001.040.000.518.90.10.00 -Adjust for reorganization 0 223,884 223,884 Payroll Taxes&Benefits-CPW Admin 001.040.000.518.90.20.00 -Adjust for reorganization 0 75,044 75,044 Office Supplies-CPW Admin 001.040.000.518.90.31.01 -Adjust for reorganization 0 700 700 Cell Phones-CPW Admin 001.040.000.518.90.42.03 -Adjust for reorganization 0 960 960 Travel-CPW Admin 001.040.000.518.90.43.01 -Adjust for reorganization 0 250 250 Copier Maintenance-CPW Admin 001.040.000.518.90.48.02 -Adjust for reorganization 0 300 300 Software Licenses&Maint.-CPW Admii 001.040.000.518.90.48.03 -Adjust for reorganization 0 840 840 Registrations-CPW Admin 001.040.000.518.90.49.04 -Adjust for reorganization 0 250 250 Salaries and Wages-Engineering 001.040.041.543.10.10.00 -Adjust for reorganization 909,701 (45,708) 863,993 Payroll Taxes&Benefits-Engineering 001.040.041.543.10.20.00 -Adjust for reorganization 421,297 (37,073) 384,224 Office Supplies-Engineering 001.040.041.543.10.31.01 -Adjust for reorganization 6,500 (525) 5,975 Spokane County GIS-Engineering 001.040.041.543.10.41.03 -Adjust for reorganization 8,900 (1,155) 7,745 Cell Phones-Engineering 001.040.041.543.10.42.03 -Adjust for reorganization 6,816 (960) 5,856 Travel-Engineering 001.040.041.543.10.43.01 -Adjust for reorganization 5,500 (250) 5,250 Copier Maintenance-Engineering 001.040.041.543.10.48.02 -Adjust for reorganization 4,500 (225) 4,275 Software Licenses&Maint.-Engineerinc 001.040.041.543.10.48.03 -Adjust for reorganization 18,810 (840) 17,970 Registrations-Engineering 001.040.041.543.10.49.04 -Adjust for reorganization 5,175 (250) 4,925 Payroll Taxes&Benefits-Engineering 001.040.041.558.50.20.00 -Adjust for reorganization 268,407 (14,830) 253,577 Office Supplies-Engineering 001.040.041.558.50.31.01 -Adjust for reorganization 2,500 (175) 2,325 Spokane County GIS-Engineering 001.040.041.558.50.41.03 -Adjust for reorganization 7,056 (330) 6,726 Copier Maintenance-Engineering 001.040.041.558.50.48.02 -Adjust for reorganization 1,500 (75) 1,425 Page 2 of 6 P:\Finance\2022 Budget\Budget AmendmentWmendment#1\2022 05 03 Admin Report\2022 Amendment No 1 Detail v1 for RCA CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 5/3/2022 2022 Budget-Amendment#1 Line Item Detail Account Account Initial Amended Description Number Description/Justification Budget Amendment Budget #001 -General Fund -continued Recurring Expenditures-continued Software Licenses&Maint.-Engineerinc 001.040.041.558.50.48.03 -Adjust for reorganization 2,650 6,300 8,950 Salaries and Wages-Econ Dev 001.040.042.558.70.10.00 -Adjust for reorganization 524,399 9,358 533,757 Payroll Taxes&Benefits-Econ Dev 001.040.042.558.70.20.00 -Adjust for reorganization 227,180 (12,494) 214,686 Office Supplies-Econ Dev 001.040.042.558.70.31.01 -Adjust for reorganization 600 1,200 1,800 Spokane County GIS-Econ Dev 001.040.042.558.70.41.03 -Adjust for reorganization 0 4,400 4,400 Copier Maintenance-Econ Dev 001.040.042.558.70.48.02 -Adjust for reorganization 0 900 900 Salaries and Wages-HHS 001.040.042.565.40.10.00 -Adjust for reorganization 0 93,000 93,000 Payroll Taxes&Benefits-HHS 001.040.042.565.40.20.00 -Adjust for reorganization 0 46,930 46,930 Supplies-HHS 001.040.042.565.40.31.01 -Adjust for reorganization 0 2,500 2,500 Professional Services-H HS 001.040.042.565.40.41.05 -Adjust for reorganization 0 101,000 101,000 Cell Phones-HHS 001.040.042.565.40.42.03 -Adjust for reorganization 0 600 600 Travel/Mileage-HHS 001.040.042.565.40.43.01 -Adjust for reorganization 0 1,000 1,000 Shelter Space Rental-HHS 001.040.042.565.40.45.00 -Adjust for reorganization 0 24,000 24,000 Memberships-HHS 001.040.042.565.40.49.02 -Adjust for reorganization 0 200 200 Registrations/Training-HHS 001.040.042.565.40.49.04 -Adjust for reorganization 0 1,000 1,000 Salaries and Wages-Code Enf. 001.040.043.524.60.10.00 -Adjust for reorganization 203,628 (80,000) 123,628 Payroll Taxes&Benefits-Code Enf. 001.040.043.524.60.20.00 -Adjust for reorganization 105,236 (50,010) 55,226 Vehicle Maintenance Supplies-Code En 001.040.043.524.60.31.10 -Adjust for reorganization 0 1,000 1,000 Software Licenses&Maint.-Code Enf. 001.040.043.524.60.48.03 -Adjust for reorganization 0 3,150 3,150 Code Enforcement Abatement 001.040.043.524.60.49.08 - Increase for several high cost abatements 25,000 475,000 500,000 Salaries and Wages-Building 001.040.043.558.50.10.00 -Adjust for reorganization 1,046,985 (125,744) 921,241 Payroll Taxes&Benefits-Building 001.040.043.558.50.20.00 -Adjust for reorganization 491,426 (81,734) 409,692 Office Supplies-Building 001.040.043.558.50.31.01 -Adjust for reorganization 6,000 (2,400) 3,600 Vehicle Maintenance Supplies-Bldg 001.040.043.558.50.31.10 -Adjust for reorganization 6,000 (1,000) 5,000 Copier Maintenance-Building 001.040.043.558.50.48.02 -Adjust for reorganization 5,000 (2,250) 2,750 Software Licenses&Maint.-Building 001.040.043.558.50.48.03 -Adjust for reorganization 23,000 (1,575) 21,425 Salaries and Wages-Building 001.040.043.558.60.10.00 -Adjust for reorganization 275,028 (275,028) 0 Payroll Taxes&Benefits-Building 001.040.043.558.60.20.00 -Adjust for reorganization 126,570 (126,570) 0 Office Supplies-Building 001.040.043.558.60.31.01 -Adjust for reorganization 5,000 (5,000) 0 Publications-Building 001.040.043.558.60.31.03 -Adjust for reorganization 600 (600) 0 Meeting Supplies-Building 001.040.043.558.60.31.05 -Adjust for reorganization 500 (500) 0 Small Tools&Minor Equipment-Bldg 001.040.043.558.60.35.01 -Adjust for reorganization 1,500 (1,500) 0 Spokane County GIS-Building 001.040.043.558.60.41.03 -Adjust for reorganization 11,000 (11,000) 0 Professional Services-Building 001.040.043.558.60.41.05 -Adjust for reorganization 40,000 (40,000) 0 Legal Notices-Building 001.040.043.558.60.41.18 -Adjust for reorganization 30,000 (30,000) 0 Page 3 of 6 P:\Finance\2022 Budget\Budget AmendmentWmendment#1\2022 05 03 Admin Report\2022 Amendment No 1 Detail v1 for RCA CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 5/3/2022 2022 Budget-Amendment#1 Line Item Detail Account Account Initial Amended Description Number Description/Justification Budget Amendment Budget #001 -General Fund -continued Recurring Expenditures-continued Hearing Examiner-Building 001.040.043.558.60.41.54 -Adjust for reorganization 40,000 (40,000) 0 Postage-Building 001.040.043.558.60.42.01 -Adjust for reorganization 2,000 (2,000) 0 Travel/Mileage-Building 001.040.043.558.60.43.01 -Adjust for reorganization 1,500 (1,500) 0 Copier Maintenance-Building 001.040.043.558.60.48.02 -Adjust for reorganization 3,000 (3,000) 0 Software Licenses&Maintenance-Bldg 001.040.043.558.60.48.03 -Adjust for reorganization 18,000 (18,000) 0 Subscriptions-Building 001.040.043.558.60.49.01 -Adjust for reorganization 300 (300) 0 Memberships-Building 001.040.043.558.60.49.02 -Adjust for reorganization 2,100 (2,100) 0 Printing&Binding-Building 001.040.043.558.60.49.03 -Adjust for reorganization 500 (500) 0 Registrations-Building 001.040.043.558.60.49.04 -Adjust for reorganization 1,500 (1,500) 0 Filing&Recording Fees-Building 001.040.043.558.60.49.05 -Adjust for reorganization 20,000 (20,000) 0 Salaries and Wages-Planning 001.040.044.558.60.10.00 -Adjust for reorganization 0 476,532 476,532 Payroll Taxes&Benefits-Planning 001.040.044.558.60.20.00 -Adjust for reorganization 0 193,315 193,315 Office Supplies-Planning 001.040.044.558.60.31.01 -Adjust for reorganization 0 6,200 6,200 Publications-Planning 001.040.044.558.60.31.03 -Adjust for reorganization 0 600 600 Meeting Supplies-Planning 001.040.044.558.60.31.05 -Adjust for reorganization 0 500 500 Small Tools&Minor Equipment-Ping 001.040.044.558.60.35.01 -Adjust for reorganization 0 1,500 1,500 Spokane County GIS-Planning 001.040.044.558.60.41.03 -Adjust for reorganization 0 8,708 8,708 Professional Services-Planning 001.040.044.558.60.41.05 -Adjust for reorganization 0 40,000 40,000 Legal Notices-Planning 001.040.044.558.60.41.18 -Adjust for reorganization 0 30,000 30,000 Hearing Examiner-Planning 001.040.044.558.60.41.54 -Adjust for reorganization 0 40,000 40,000 Postage-Planning 001.040.044.558.60.42.01 -Adjust for reorganization 0 2,000 2,000 Travel/Mileage-Planning 001.040.044.558.60.43.01 -Adjust for reorganization 0 1,500 1,500 Copier Maintenance-Planning 001.040.044.558.60.48.02 -Adjust for reorganization 0 4,350 4,350 Software Licenses&Maintenance-Ping 001.040.044.558.60.48.03 -Adjust for reorganization 0 10,125 10,125 Subscriptions-Planning 001.040.044.558.60.49.01 -Adjust for reorganization 0 300 300 Memberships-Planning 001.040.044.558.60.49.02 -Adjust for reorganization 0 2,100 2,100 Printing&Binding-Planning 001.040.044.558.60.49.03 -Adjust for reorganization 0 500 500 Registrations-Planning 001.040.044.558.60.49.04 -Adjust for reorganization 0 1,500 1,500 Filing&Recording Fees-Planning 001.040.044.558.60.49.05 -Adjust for reorganization 0 20,000 20,000 Total recurring expenditures 686,706 Page 4 of 6 P:\Finance\2022 Budget\Budget AmendmentWmendment#1\2022 05 03 Admin Report\2022 Amendment No 1 Detail v1 for RCA CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 5/3/2022 2022 Budget-Amendment#1 Line Item Detail Account Account Initial Amended Description Number Description/Justification Budget Amendment Budget Nonrecurring Expenditures Transfer out-#122 001.090.099.597.12.00.20 - Replenish winter weather reserve 0 89,805 89,805 Transfer out-#312 001.090.099.597.31.00.20 - 2020#001 fund bal>50% 0 3,593,000 3,593,000 Total nonrecurring expenditures 3,682,805 Total of all General Fund revenues (183,000) Total of all General Fund expenditures 4,369,511 #104-Hotel/Motel Tax-Tourism Facilities Fund Revenues Transfers in-#105 104.000.000.397.10.50 - Transfer based on Council action in 2021 0 273,000 273,000 Total revenues 273,000 #105-Hotel/Motel Tax Fund Expenditures Tourism Promotion 105.105.000.557.30.41.00 - Decrease for based on actual Council awards 571,000 (273,000) 298,000 Transfers out-#104 105.105.000.597.10.00.40 - Transfer based on Council action in 2021 0 273,000 273,000 Total expenditures 0 #122-Winter Weather Reserve Fund Revenues Transfer in-#001 122.122.000.397.00.10 - Replenish Winter Weather Reserve 0 89,805 89,805 Total revenues 89,805 Page 5 of 6 P:\Finance\2022 Budget\Budget AmendmentWmendment#1\2022 05 03 Admin Report\2022 Amendment No 1 Detail v1 for RCA CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 5/3/2022 2022 Budget-Amendment#1 Line Item Detail Account Account Initial Amended Description Number Description/Justification Budget Amendment Budget #303-Street Capital Projects Fund Revenues Grant Proceeds 303.000.343.331.21.01 - Coronavirus Local Fiscal Recovery Funds 0 750,000 750,000 Total revenues 750,000 Expenditures Buckeye Ave Sewer Extension 303.000.343.595.xx.xx.xx - 2022 Construction Costs(CLFR) 0 750,000 750,000 Total expenditures 750,000 #310-Civic Facilities Capital Projects Fund Expenditures Payment to the Library District for joint Payment to Library District 310.xxx.xxx.xxx.xx.xx.xx - improvement costs per MOU 0 560,000 560,000 Total expenditures 560,000 #312-Capital Reserve Fund Revenues Transfer in-#001 312.000.000.397.00.10 - 2020#001 fund bal>50% 0 3,593,000 3,593,000 Total revenues 3,593,000 Expenditures WSDOT Sullivan Park Property Acquisitil 312.000.000.594.76.61.00 - Final payment for property acquisition 0 759,600 759,600 Total expenditures 759,600 Totals Across all Funds Total revenues 4,522,805 Total expenditures 6,439,111 Page 6 of 6 P:\Finance\2022 Budget\Budget Amendment\Amendment#1\2022 05 03 Admin Report\2022 Budget Summary for Amended Funds No 1 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA 5/3/2022 2022 Budget Amendment 2022 As Proposed As Adopted Amendment Amended #001 -GENERAL FUND RECURRING ACTIVITY Revenues Property Tax 13,199,900 0 13,199,900 Sales Tax 27,720,000 0 27,720,000 Sales Tax - Public Safety 1,276,000 0 1,276,000 Sales Tax -Criminal Justice 2,244,000 0 2,244,000 Gambling Tax and Leasehold Excise Tax 365,000 0 365,000 Franchise Fees/Business Registration 1,215,000 0 1,215,000 State Shared Revenues 1,995,500 0 1,995,500 Fines and Forfeitures/Public Safety 529,200 0 529,200 Community and Public Works 2,636,200 0 2,636,200 Recreation Program Revenues 652,400 (23,000) 629,400 Grant Proceeds 260,000 (160,000) 100,000 Miscellaneous Department Revenue 21,000 0 21,000 Miscellaneous & Investment Interest 288,500 0 288,500 Transfers in -#105 (h/m tax-CP advertising) 30,000 0 30,000 Total Recurring Revenues 52,432,700 (183,000) 52,249,700 Expenditures City Council 645,170 36,342 681,512 City Manager 1,466,305 (545,179) 921,126 City Attorney 747,890 (11,901) 735,989 Public Safety 29,804,434 0 29,804,434 Deputy City Manager 295,477 248,945 544,422 Finance 1,571,443 (324,463) 1,246,980 Human Resources 330,321 5,044 335,365 Information Technology 0 403,123 403,123 Facilities 400,020 0 400,020 Community& Public Works-Administration 0 302,228 302,228 Community& Public Works- Engineering 2,440,282 (96,096) 2,344,186 Community& Public Works- Building 2,631,423 (444,661) 2,186,762 Community& Public Works- Planning 0 839,730 839,730 Economic Development 1,188,268 273,594 1,461,862 Parks & Rec-Administration 351,018 0 351,018 Parks & Rec- Maintenance 950,455 0 950,455 Parks & Rec- Recreation 330,687 0 330,687 Parks & Rec-Aquatics 538,700 0 538,700 Parks & Rec- Senior Center 36,801 0 36,801 Parks & Rec- CenterPlace 970,375 0 970,375 General Government 1,703,713 0 1,703,713 Transfers out-#204 (2016 LTGO debt service) 401,400 0 401,400 Transfers out-#309 (park capital projects) 160,000 0 160,000 Transfers out-#311 (pavement preservation) 1,001,800 0 1,001,800 Transfers out-#502 (insurance premium) 450,000 0 450,000 Total Recurring Expenditures 48,415,982 686,706 49,102,688 Recurring Revenues Over(Under) Recurring Expenditures 4,016,718 (869,706) 3,147,012 Page 1 of 5 P:\Finance\2022 Budget\Budget Amendment\Amendment#1\2022 05 03 Admin Report\2022 Budget Summary for Amended Funds No 1 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA 5/3/2022 2022 Budget Amendment 2022 As Proposed As Adopted Amendment Amended #001 -GENERAL FUND -continued NONRECURRING ACTIVITY Revenues Transfers in -#312 (police vehicle replacements) 1,400,000 0 1,400,000 Total Nonrecurring Revenues 1,400,000 0 1,400,000 Expenditures General Government- IT capital replacements 136,000 0 136,000 City Manager (office furniture for Project Manager employe( 5,000 0 5,000 Public Safety (2 radar trailers) 24,000 0 24,000 Public Safety (vehicle for homeless services officer) 55,000 0 55,000 Public Safety (replace carpet at Precinct) 25,000 0 25,000 Public Safety (repaint Precinct exterior) 50,000 0 50,000 Public Safety (tree&debris removal from back lot) 8,000 0 8,000 Public Safety (police vehicle replacements) 1,400,000 0 1,400,000 Parks & Rec (repaint portico at CenterPlace) 12,000 0 12,000 Parks & Rec (replace carpet at CenterPlace) 26,700 0 26,700 Parks & Rec (repair plumbing systems at pools) 30,000 0 30,000 Financial Software Capital Costs 1,000,000 0 1,000,000 Transfers out-#101 (Street Fund operations) 2,820,419 0 2,820,419 Transfers out-#122 (replenish reserve) 0 89,805 89,805 Transfers out-#312 ('20 fund bal>50%) 0 3,593,000 3,593,000 Transfers out-#501 (vehicle for Code Enf Supervisor) 40,000 0 40,000 Total Nonrecurring Expenditures 5,632,119 3,682,805 9,314,924 Nonrecurring Revenues Over(Under) Nonrecurring Expenditures (4,232,119) (3,682,805) (7,914,924) Excess (Deficit) of Total Revenues Over(Under) Total Expenditures (215,401) (4,552,511) (4,767,912) Beginning unrestricted fund balance 44,239,819 44,239,819 Ending unrestricted fund balance 44,024,418 39,471,907 Fund balance as a percent of recurring expenditures 90.93% 80.39% Page 2 of 5 P:\Finance\2022 Budget\Budget Amendment\Amendment#1\2022 05 03 Admin Report\2022 Budget Summary for Amended Funds No 1 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA 5/3/2022 2022 Budget Amendment 2022 As Proposed As Adopted Amendment Amended SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS #104- HOTEL/MOTEL TAX -TOURISM FACILITIES FUND Revenues Hotel/Motel Tax 400,000 0 400,000 Investment Interest 2,500 0 2,500 Transfers in -#105 0 273,000 273,000 Total revenues 402,500 273,000 675,500 Expenditures Capital Outlay 0 0 0 Total expenditures 0 0 0 Revenues over (under) expenditures 402,500 675,500 Beginning fund balance 4,672,194 4,672,194 Ending fund balance 5,074,694 5,347,694 #105- HOTEL/MOTEL TAX FUND Revenues Hotel/Motel Tax 600,000 0 600,000 Investment Interest 1,000 0 1,000 Total revenues 601,000 0 601,000 Expenditures Transfers out-#001 30,000 0 30,000 Transfers out-#104 0 273,000 273,000 Tourism Promotion 571,000 (273,000) 298,000 Total expenditures 601,000 0 601,000 Revenues over (under) expenditures 0 0 Beginning fund balance 165,000 165,000 Ending fund balance 165,000 165,000 #122 -WINTER WEATHER RESERVE FUND Revenues Investment Interest 800 0 800 Transfers in -#001 0 89,805 89,805 Total revenues 800 89,805 90,605 Expenditures Street maintenance expenditures 500,000 0 500,000 Transfers out-#101 0 0 0 Total expenditures 500,000 0 500,000 Revenues over (under) expenditures (499,200) (409,395) Beginning fund balance 434,887 434,887 Ending fund balance (64,313) 25,492 Page 3 of 5 P:\Finance\2022 Budget\Budget Amendment\Amendment#1\2022 05 03 Admin Report\2022 Budget Summary for Amended Funds No 1 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA 5/3/2022 2022 Budget Amendment 2022 As Proposed As Adopted Amendment Amended CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS #303 -STREET CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND Revenues Grant Proceeds 6,956,322 750,000 7,706,322 Developer 1,164,399 0 1,164,399 Transfers in -#301 361,780 0 361,780 Transfers in -#302 1,113,649 0 1,113,649 Transfers in -#312 225,000 0 225,000 Transfers in -#315 150,000 0 150,000 Total revenues 9,971,150 750,000 10,721,150 Expenditures 205 Sprague/Barker Intersections Improvement 1,871,500 0 1,871,500 249 Sullivan/Wellesley Intersection 1,903,176 0 1,903,176 267 Mission Ave Sidewalk 0 0 0 275 Barker Rd Widening - River to Euclid 0 0 0 285 Indiana Ave Pres- Evergreen to Sullivan 0 0 0 293 2018 CSS Citywide Reflective Signal BP 8,250 0 8,250 294 Citywide Reflective Signal Post Panels 3,575 0 3,575 299 Argonne Rd Concrete Pvmt Indiana to Mont 130,017 0 130,017 300 Pines and Mission Intersection Improvement 1,746,643 0 1,746,643 301 Park and Mission Intersection Improvements 0 0 0 310 Sullivan Rd Overcrossing UP RR Deck Repl 0 0 0 313 Barker Rd/Union Pacific Crossing 1,444,000 0 1,444,000 318 Wilbur Sidewalk- Boone to Mission 572,909 0 572,909 320 Sullivan Preservation - Sprague to 8th 412,000 0 412,000 326 2020 Citywide Retroreflective Post Plates 142,880 0 142,880 329 Barker Road Imp-City Limits to Appleway 250,000 0 250,000 343 Buckeye Ave Sewer Extenstion 0 750,000 750,000 Mission Ave over Evergreen Deck Repair 261,200 0 261,200 School zone beacons 225,000 0 225,000 Contingency 1,000,000 0 1,000,000 Total expenditures 9,971,150 750,000 10,721,150 Revenues over (under) expenditures 0 0 Beginning fund balance 75,578 75,578 Ending fund balance 75,578 75,578 Page 4 of 5 P:\Finance\2022 Budget\Budget Amendment\Amendment#1\2022 05 03 Admin Report\2022 Budget Summary for Amended Funds No 1 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA 5/3/2022 2022 Budget Amendment 2022 As Proposed As Adopted Amendment Amended CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS -continued #310 -CIVIC FACILITIES CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND Revenues Investment Interest 1,300 0 1,300 Total revenues 1,300 0 1,300 Expenditures Payment to Library District 0 560,000 560,000 Total expenditures 0 560,000 560,000 Revenues over (under) expenditures 1,300 (558,700) Beginning fund balance 840,056 840,056 Ending fund balance 841,356 281,356 #312 -CAPITAL RESERVE FUND Revenues Transfers in -#001 ('20 fund bal>50%) 0 3,593,000 3,593,000 Investment Interest 10,000 0 10,000 Total revenues 10,000 3,593,000 3,603,000 Expenditures Transfers out-#001 (police vehicle replacements) 1,400,000 0 1,400,000 Transfers out-#303 (school zone beacons) 225,000 0 225,000 Transfers out-#309 (Balfour Park Improvements Ph. 1) 3,507,520 0 3,507,520 Transfers out-#309 (Sullivan Park water line) 314,900 0 314,900 Transfers out-#309 (Spokane Valley River Loop Trail) 700,000 0 700,000 Transfers out-#314 (Barker Rd Overpass) 724,905 0 724,905 Transfers out-#314 (Sullivan Rd Interchange) 101,385 0 101,385 Transfers out-#316 (Fairgrounds Building) 750,000 0 750,000 WSDOT Sullivan Park Property Acquisition 0 759,600 759,600 Total expenditures 7,723,710 759,600 8,483,310 Revenues over (under) expenditures (7,713,710) (4,880,310) Beginning fund balance 15,021,791 15,021,791 Ending fund balance 7,308,081 10,141,481 Page 5 of 5 Appendix A EMPLOYEE POSITION CLASSIFICATION MONTHLY SALARY SCHEDULE Effective January 1,2022 Position Title Grade 2022 Range City Manager Unclassified Deputy City Manager 22 11,920.14 - 17,277.75 City Attorney 21 10,738.86 - 15,550.10 Finance Director 21 10,738.86 - 15,550.10 Community&Public Works Director 21 10,738.86 - 15,550.10 Parks,Recreation,and Facilities Director 20 9,664.85 - 13,996.12 City Engineer 20 9,664.85 - 13,996.12 Economic Development Director 20 9,664.85 - 13,996.12 Human Resources Director 20 9,664.85 - 13,996.12 Senior Deputy City Attorney 19 8,698.21 - 12,596.64 kluman Rccourcce Managcr 4g 8,608.21 — 12,506.64 Building Official 19 7,829.40 - 11,336.42 Planning Manager 18 7,829.40 - 11,336.42 Engineering Manager 18 7,829.40 - 11,336.42 Traffic Engineering Manager 18 7,829.40 - 11,336.42 Economic Development Manager 48. 7,829.410 — 11,336.412 Senior Engineer 17 7,046.06 - 10,202.36 Accounting Manager 17 7,046.06 - 10,202.36 Assistant Building Official 17 7,046.06 - 10,202.36 Public Works Superintendent 17 7,046.06 - 10,202.36 Senior Administrative Analyst 17 7,046.06 - 10,202.36 IT Manager 17 7,046.06 - 10,202.36 Legislative Coordinator 16 6,340.81 - 9,181.53 Deputy City Attorney 16 6,340.81 - 9,181.53 City Clerk 16 6,340.81 - 9,181.53 Engineer 16 6,340.81 - 9,181.53 Senior Planner 16 6,340.81 - 9,181.53 Development Services Coordinator 16 6,340.81 - 9,181.53 Database Administrator 16 6,340.81 - 9,181.53 Accountant/Budget Analyst 16 6,340.81 - 9,181.53 Housing and Homeless Services Coordinator 16 6,340.81 - 9,181.53 Project Manager 16 6,340.81 - 9,181.53 CAD Manager 16 6,340.81 - 9,181.53 Code Enforcement Supervisor 16 6,340.81 - 9,181.53 Associate Planner 15 5,707.52 - 8,263.95 Assistant Engineer 15 5,707.52 - 8,263.95 IT Specialist 15 5,707.52 - 8,263.95 Engineering Technician II 15 5,707.52 - 8,263.95 Communications and Marketing Officer 15 5,707.52 - 8,263.95 Economic Development Project Specialist 15 5,707.52 - 8,263.95 Senior Plans Examiner 15 5,707.52 - 8,263.95 Public Information Officer 15 5,707.52 - 8,263.95 Administrative Analyst 15 5,707.52 - 8,263.95 Maintenance/Construction Foreman 15 5,707.52 - 8,263.95 GIS Analyst 15 5,707.52 8,263.95 Mechanic 14 5,137.08 - 7,438.13 Human Resource Analyst 14 5,137.08 - 7,438.13 CenterPlace Coordinator 14 5,137.08 - 7,438.13 Planner 14 5,137.08 - 7,438.13 Building Inspector II 14 5,137.08 - 7,438.13 Plans Examiner 14 5,137.08 - 7,438.13 Engineering Technician I 14 5,137.08 - 7,438.13 Senior Permit Specialist 14 5,137.08 - 7,438.13 Code Enforcement Officer 14 5,137.08 - 7,438.13 Maintenance/Construction Inspector 14 5,137.08 - 7,438.13 Recreation Coordinator 13 4,623.00 - 6,694.06 Deputy City Clerk 13 4,623.00 - 6,694.06 Customer Relations/Facilities Coordinator 13 4,623.00 - 6,694.06 Building Inspector I 13 4,623.00 - 6,694.06 Executive Assistant 13 4,623.00 - 6,694.06 Planning Technician 13 4,623.00 - 6,694.06 Human Resources Technician 13 4,623.00 - 6,694.06 Senior Center Specialist 12 4,162.22 - 6,024.50 Permit Facilitator 12 4,162.22 - 6,024.50 Help Desk Technician 12 4,162.22 - 6,024.50 Accounting Technician 12 4,162.22 - 6,024.50 Administrative Assistant 12 4,162.22 - 6,024.50 Recreation Specialist 12 4,162.22 - 6,024.50 Maintenance Worker 11-12 3,744.85 - 6,024.50 Permit Specialist 11 3,744.85 - 5,422.31 Office Assistant II 10-11 3,370.14 - 5,422.31 Custodian 10 3,370.14 - 4,878.94 Office Assistant I 9-10 3,033.50 - 4,878.94 Note: Slight rounding differences may exist between the figures reflected on this page and the actual payroll rates computed by the Eden Payroll System. CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: May 3, 2022 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ® admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Potential Grant Opportunity— Pedestrian & Bicycle Program (PBP) and Safe Routes to School (SRTS) GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 35.77.010: Six Year Transportation Improvement Program PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: • June 30, 2020 — City Council authorized the City Manager to apply to these 2020 PBP call for projects. BACKGROUND: In March 2022, the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) issued a call for projects for the PBP and SRTS that aims to improve safety and increase the number of people walking or bicycling. Both programs use a weighted evaluation process to score projects: safety (40%), equity (20%), value (10%), deliverability (12%), and quality (18%). Both funding programs share the same application; however a single project must apply to only one of the programs, not both. Critical program details are: PBP SRTS Total Available Program Funds: $56.7 M $59.0 M Funding Type (State/Federal) State State and/or Federal Match Amount: No match required, but preference given to projects with match when requests exceed $800,000 Application Due Date: May 30, 2022 June 6, 2022 Award Date: Recommendations to Governor by December 2022, formally awarded in June 2023 as part of 2023-2025 state budget. City staff reviewed the adopted six-year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP), various elements of the comprehensive plan, and priority projects to generate a preliminary project list that satisfies eligibility requirements for both PBP and SRTS programs, see below. Pedestrian & Bicycle Program 1. Spokane Valley River Loop Trail: Plante's Ferry Park to Sullivan Park 2. South Barker Corridor Improvements: Sprague Ave. to 4th Ave. (excluding roundabouts) 3. South Barker Corridor Improvements: 4th Ave. to 8th Ave. (excluding roundabouts) Safe Routes to School Program 1. South Barker Corridor Improvements: Sprague Ave. to 4th Ave. (excluding roundabouts) 2. South Barker Corridor Improvements: 4th Ave. to 8th Ave. (excluding roundabouts) OPTIONS: Council discretion RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Staff requests Council consensus that staff develop the recommended project list and return to Council on May 10, 2022, for a motion consideration authorizing the City Manager to submit the prioritized project list to WSDOT. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: None at this time. Based on the 2020 call for projects, the PBP awarded funds to projects generally with a match amount ranging between 20%-30%. The 2020 SRTS program awarded funds to projects generally with 15% match. Final project estimated costs and local match contributions will be presented to Council as part of the May 10, 2022 motion consideration. STAFF CONTACT: Adam Jackson, P.E. —Sr. Engineer— Planning & Grants ATTACHMENTS: N/A CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: May 3, 2022 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: [' consent ❑ old business ❑ new business [' public hearing [' information ® Admin. Report [' pending legislation [' executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Code Enforcement Program—Parking on Private Property CTA Language GOVERNING LEGISLATION: Chapter 7.05 Nuisances; 19.60 Permitted uses, 19.160 Temporary Uses; 22.50 Off-Street Parking and Loading Standards. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Adoption in 2003 of chapter 7.05 SVMC relating to nuisances; amended in 2005, 2006, 2008, 2012, 2017; and 2018. Chapter 17.100 relating to enforcement was recodified in its entirety in 2016. SVMC 7.05.045 was added as a new section in 2019 to address chronic criminal nuisance properties. Chapter 17.105 SVMC relating to unfit structures was added in 2018 to provide an alternative approach to addressing properties that have seriously degraded structures; June 1, 2021 Code Enforcement Program Overview; June 29, 2021 Administrative Report on Code Enforcement amendments- policy discussion on Council preferences; October 5, 2021 Administrative Report on Code Enforcement Program follow-up — Topic #1 Parking; and October 12, 2021 Administrative Report on Code Enforcement Program follow-up —Topic#2 Camping. BACKGROUND: As a follow-up to the Code Enforcement Program overview presentation during the regular City Council meeting on June 1, 2021, staff initiated a broad discussion with Council during the regular City Council meeting on June 29, 2021, as to the specific issues and nuisances which are of concern to local residents, business owners, and property owners, as well as elected officials. City Council has had multiple follow-up discussions on a number of the topics. As a result of the discussions, staff drafted amended SVMC language for Council review, and tonight's presentation will focus on draft amendments to the regulatory language related to junk vehicles, vehicle parking/storage on private property, camping on private property, and multifamily development parking. As discussed during the October 12, 2021 meeting, the draft language is intentionally restrictive and meant to serve as a starting point for discussion. During this presentation, staff will seek input from Council to fine tune draft amendment language for final consideration. OPTIONS: Discussion RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Discussion and consensus of Council to authorize staff to proceed with draft amendment language to address specific types of concerns related to junk vehicles, parking on private property, camping on private property, and multifamily development parking. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: N/A STAFF CONTACT: Erik Lamb, Deputy City Manager Bill Helbig, Community& Public Works Director ATTACHMENTS: 1. PowerPoint presentation 2. Draft Code Text Revisions Code Enforcement Program Follow-up Topic Junk Vehicles, Vehicle Parking, and Camping on Private Property May 3, 2022 Erik Lamb, Deputy City Manager Bill Helbig, Community & Public Works Director Sj*ikiiic Valley Background Council discussion on June 29, 2021, October 5, 2021, and October 12, 2021 regarding various nuisance issues. Items to be discussed tonight: Junk/inoperable vehicle storage Vehicle (including RV) Parking and Storage on private property RV and tent camping on private property Multifamily parking issues 2 Junk Vehicles Concerns: Junk/inoperable vehicle storage Considerations: Current definition of "junk vehicle" tracks state law. Rather than amending, consider adding types of vehicles that Council believes are nuisances, such as "unlicensed" vehicles. Two junk vehicles and a `parts' vehicle currently allowed Repairs allowed for 60 days, through proof of invoices, receipts, etc. Difficult to prove, since often no receipts by time of complaint Must be kept in lawful structure, behind a fence, or otherwise site screened 3 Junk Vehicles Current SVMC Revised SVMC Junk vehicles prohibited Keep definition of "junk vehicle" Must meet 3 of 4 criteria Add definition of "unlicensed vehicle" Junk Vehicle exceptions: No license or registration, or expired Exception for repairs registration greater than 45 days Exception for two sight-screened junk Prohibit unlicensed vehicles vehicles Modify Junk Vehicle exceptions: Delete repair exception, as it is difficult to enforce and repair cars may be kept in lawful structures, like garages. Delete exception for two sight-screened junk vehicles, as they are still often visible to neighbors and create public health and safety issues. 4 Junk Vehicles t2 M 2 2021 a<1"©h 18 PM ''',VA,, 6,�.,-+" - v`.'� Apr 17 2020 at 10:18:59 AM /M� k 3 b _ < Spokane Valley ra — . r �`� ` `� �x t ram. - ; ` mart.:. # �' '� _ � - - e El E:1 � i st ,,,,, &:41frr ,., , .. . ' jr,..........'''' -'.,„44'.'""' _, ' is' ' L.---1-31 iesmaTim ,Ft��# -z rt, ..,.. _ \ "" . �' �.. y = � j aP10 a `3� �i ��, °', f a2 08 fl P15201l13 32 hirrsatA ,-, --,.. .,,.-r ,- -,--,-- L. 77 .. 5 FYI Mr rrE Y F =➢ak5�«�:�,a�, gym. .', , _ � Junk Vehicles - Discussion Discussion & Determinations Junk Vehicle Unlicensed Vehicles Exceptions 6 Vehicle Parking & Storage - Private Property Concerns: Non junk vehicle storage and parking on private property RV parking and storage on private property Considerations: Number of non junk vehicles parked/stored on private property? SVMC does not limit the number of lawful vehicles parked on private residential property or where they may be parked on private property SVMC does not limit number of unlicensed but otherwise operational vehicles parked on private residential property Locations where vehicle parking and/or storage allowed? SVMC requires driveways for single-family residences to be asphalt, concrete, grasscrete or similar surface 7 Vehicle Parking & Storage - Private Property Current SVMC Revised SVMC No limits on number of parked Limit parking/storage so that it is only vehicles on private property allowable as an accessory use to an No limits on location of parked established residential or otherwise permitted use vehicles on private property Limit number of parked vehicles on private property No more than (*) parked or stored vehicles (operable) visible from the public right-of-way. No more than (*) RVs, unless property is greater than one acre, in which case (*) RVs may be stored Limit locations where vehicles may be parked No parking within required side or rear yards Parking only on areas with pavement, concrete, 8 grasscrete, or similar material Vehicle Parking & Storage - Private Property _. �- h 3 � r'" a' ......... ...„„ .... , p rj })� J i� ti& aT x y ,,..,,,;',1,..-i'''",-7,.:.:- � e _ .e� / t , fir tyx 3l 9T — - • f- a ~ h ��� �� � � � ����' � - .� her' . R �S' S �. �F u __.,,. _, „T_-..,A,:•-,:ayjasi_ - A. , ,f-0_' '-'34-'-.-.1k*,,i'Ili 1:-..--t---°--I -— -.7•;-'4A-iiii4r 1-!. 1lik _ _r j_ ti N , r.' . nazi a I, :r s C, r Apr22,2�22 al."044'2 APO q wt �a R c YY �Ms a tea .. L . .� e' F -- ■ a � : : '1:1 IL R p .e e rj -- a Vehicle ParkingStorage& - Discussion Discussion & Determinations Accessory use to a permitted use Number of operable vehicles on private property Number of RVs on parcel Unless large parcel Locations where parking allowed 10 RV & Tent Camping on Private Property Concerns: Use of RVs and/or tents as dwellings on private property (camping) Considerations: Challenges with enforcement - limiting number of parked RVs will address some of the enforcement issues Strengthen and clarify Temporary Use Permit regulations SVMC addresses guest parking of RVs but does not require permit or verification SVMC allows `temporary living quarters' during construction but does not specify RV Opportunity to include use of RV for quarantine during pandemic events Use of temporary permit allows more consistent enforcement Places more requirements on owners wishing to temporarily use RVs legally Define and regulate tent camping Language should differentiate between `family camp-out' and living in a tent Opportunity to address use of undeveloped/abandoned properties for camping 11 RV & Tent Camping on Private Property Current SVMC Revised SVMC No clear statement prohibiting Prohibit camping subject to following camping on private property exceptions: May reside in RV for up to 30 days Allow use of RV for living purposes with each year valid temporary use permit Permit for up to (*) days No regulations addressing other Longer stays for temporary use of RV during types of camping on private construction projects (i.e., live in RV while property (such as use of tents) constructing or renovating house) Allow short-term use of tent/similar set- up for limited social purposes, such as kids' birthday Only when there is already established habitable residence No more than 48 hours 12 No more than (*) times per year PropertyRV & Tent Cam in on Private , .-. r F � t 4 U>* 14,1 t ,, 1r.. s 4 rt• ,,,,...„„ ,,,,,,,,, .. . d r rw--) . .. ... , . . . . .„,..„,..,,,: ,,,. ._..,,,,.... .._,....,..,,,. . _, _ _..,_ ,.., . . , , :. ,,,_„,,,,, _ ,..,.,k.,,,,..,,,,,_.. .,....•,•,_,..,,,,.„„„,,.,:,,,,' „,•',.„1,,,,,-;'„'„i'F.,.',!'-',„'„:: __. , __ „..„,„:„. . ,n.. ..,...,,._=, , ,, ,-,4 , -,, _ ...„ _ ,.. . .___ __ _ __ .,' .:'...., ,, _,. _ . _r__., „.„ ,,,,,,,,,,„ , L _ ____ _ _ 7 '‘ f----3.----7'=' �'e q b 1 t fro,,: '7 . a 060��O1a�.i7 12 084 o o sad .,.' ? �. O8l10I2017 `l l r220020011T 90:49, a pi,y t ffi- !a - '�` % ' b ` Fi ' '-'•-5.134,4• -1. , Ot 4.1; .-4.-.";":"-"45 ,,'1.,.',''•-- "' w • � 4, -•• ..- ;, .,t — - .An - 1 ; L k,,r t\� ;\\ :r �' \ � ti 1P f,� ® ,tea�r s. r- ir., .144: � � A �. A r . r. � sue- _ may, ` �� _ - _,40 :s 4 ' d f t�wr- 'to 4v.`��\ i' \ ), �' _Ii/ _ . "gam - 1"' �-.s'- *fig �1 �T\ 7 J. % ) % r) \ \\ +t -:^ z sx .'PTO' Y� y- f a✓ 3. 3 �> ` 05,/©2/2017 10:31 i " i 13 .- ,iF:,- RV & Tent Camping - Discussion Discussion & Determinations RV regulated by parking Living in RV Permit Number of Days Short-term Tent Use Number of Days 14 MultifamilyDevelopment Parking Concerns: Overflow on-street parking near multifamily developments Considerations: Are all provided spaces being utilized by residents of multifamily facilities? Private garages and parking spaces which cost extra not always utilized, but count as part of the qualifying spaces for purposes of meeting code requirements Sufficient number of spaces in code? I to 1.5 spaces for dwelling unit + 5% of total for guests Modify multifamily regulations to exclude private individual garages when counting required parking spaces Parking garage structures for common use of tenants not affected Doesn't increase total number of spaces, allowing maximization of number of dwelling units Increase total number of spaces required? May reduce number of dwellings provided 15 MultifamilyDevelopment Parking Current SVMC Revised SVMC 1 to 1.5 spaces per dwelling unit + To count as required space, the identified 5% of total for guests required per parking space must be accessible to all multifamily dwelling occupants and guests. Parking which costs All identified spaces, including private a fee and private parking garages for garages, qualify to meet required individual units are not counted as number qualifying spaces. 16 Multifamily Development Parking - Discussion Discussion & Determinations Revise parking required per dwelling What constitutes parking (open, accessible) Next Steps Discussion 18 DRAFT Chapter 7.05 NUISANCES Sections: 7.05.010 Purpose and intent. 7.05.020 Definitions. 7.05.030 Compliance,authority and administration. 7.05.040 Nuisances prohibited. 7.05.045 Chronic nuisances. 7.05.050 Repealed. 7.05.060 Procedures when probable nuisance violation is identified. 7.05.070 — 7.05.200 Repealed. 7.05.010 Purpose and intent. The purpose and intent of Chapter 7.05 SVMC is to create and maintain a safe and healthy environment for the citizens of the City by identifying and eliminating the conditions that contribute to injury,illness,devaluation of property,and the incidence of crime through the existence of nuisance conditions on public and private property. 7.05.020 Definitions. In addition to any definitions contained in Appendix A,the following words shall,for the purposes of Chapters 7.05 and 17.100 SVMC,be defined as: "Days"are counted as business days when five or fewer days are allowed to perform an act required by Chapter 7.05 SVMC."Days"are considered calendar days when more than five days are allowed to perform an act required by Chapter 7.05 SVMC."Days"are counted by excluding the first day,and including the last day,unless the last day is a holiday,Saturday,or Sunday,pursuant to RCW 1.12.040,as now adopted or hereafter amended. "Determination of compliance"means a written determination by the city manager or designee that the violation(s) stated in the warning,voluntary compliance agreement,notice and order,stop work order,or other applicable order have been sufficiently abated so as to comply with the SVMC. "Graffiti"means an unauthorized marking,symbol,inscription,word,figure,design,or other inscribed material that has been placed upon any property through the use of paint,ink,dye,or any other substance capable of marking property. "Impound"means to take and hold a vehicle in legal custody pursuant to law. "Inoperable"means incapable of being operated legally on a public highway,including,but not limited to,not having a valid,current registration plate or a current certificate of registration. "Junk vehicle"means a vehicle meeting at least three of the following criteria: 1.Is three years old or older; 2.Is extensively damaged,such damage including but not limited to any of the following:a broken window or windshield,or missing wheels,tires,motor,or transmission; 3.Is apparently inoperable; 4.Has an approximate fair market value equal only to the approximate value of the scrap in it. "Nuisance"means a person's unreasonable or unlawful use of real or personal property,or unreasonable,indecent, or unlawful personal conduct or omission of conduct which materially interferes with,obstructs,or jeopardizes the Page 1 of 15 DRAFT health,safety,prosperity,quiet enjoyment of property,or welfare of others,offends common decency or public morality,or obstructs or interferes with the free use of public ways,places,or bodies of water. "Ongoing criminal activity related to the premises"means that(1)criminal activity is or has been occurring at the premises;or(2)criminal activity is or has been occurring near the premises and such activity has a reasonable and proximate connection to the premises,whether by owners,occupants,or persons visiting such owners or occupants. Examples of conduct or actions that constitute criminal activity occurring at or near the premises of the subject property include,but are not limited to,the following: 1. Service of a search warrant by law enforcement personnel;or 2.Arrest of one or more individuals by law enforcement personnel during any 24-hour period;or 3.Commission of a misdemeanor,gross misdemeanor,or felony at or near the premises and where there is a reasonable and proximate connection between the crime or criminal and the premises,including those visiting the owner or occupants of the premises;or 4.Visits by law enforcement personnel which occur based upon a reasonable belief by law enforcement that a crime is occurring or has occurred,but which do not result in any of the actions identified in subsections(1) through(3)of this definition;provided,that visits alone may not form the sole basis for determining a premises to be a chronic nuisance premises. For purposes of this definition,service of warrants,arrests,or commission of misdemeanor or felony domestic violence shall not be considered criminal activity. "Person"means any public or private individual,sole proprietorship,association,partnership,corporation,or legal entity,whether for-profit or not-for-profit,and the agents and assigns thereof. "Person(s)responsible for a junk vehicle nuisance violation"means any one or more of the following: 1.The land owner where the junk vehicle is located as shown on the last equalized assessment roll;or 2.The last registered owner of the vehicle,unless the owner in the transfer of ownership of the vehicle has complied with state law;or 3.The legal owner of the vehicle. "Person(s)responsible for a nuisance violation"means the person or persons who caused the violation,if that can be determined,and/or the owner,lessor,tenant,or other person(s)entitled to control,use,and/or occupancy of the property and the abutting public rights-of-way. "Unlicensed vehicle"means a vehicle that is not displaying a valid license plate and/or current registration tabs,or which has a license plate but registration that has an expired registration of more than 45 days. "Vehicle,"for the purposes of SVMC 7.05.040(N),includes every device capable of being moved upon a public highway and in,upon,or by which any persons or property is or may be transported or drawn upon a public highway,including bicycles.The term does not include devices other than bicycles moved by human or animal power or used exclusively upon stationary rails or tracks,pursuant to RCW 46.04.670. 7.05.030 Compliance,authority and administration. In order to discourage public nuisances and otherwise promote compliance with Chapter 7.05 SVMC,the city manager or designee may,in response to field observations,determine that violations of Chapter 7.05 SVMC have occurred or are occurring,and may utilize any of the compliance provisions set forth in Chapter 17.100 SVMC. 7.05.040 Nuisances prohibited. No person,firm,or entity shall erect,contrive,cause,continue,maintain,or permit to exist any public nuisance within the City including on the property of any person,firm,or entity or upon any public rights-of-way abutting a person,firm,or entity's property.Prohibited public nuisances include,but are not limited to: Page 2 of 15 DRAFT A.Vegetation. 1.Any vegetation,or parts thereof,which hang lower than eight feet above any public walkway or sidewalk;or hang lower than 14 feet above any public street;or which are growing in such a manner as to obstruct or impair the free and full use of any public walkway,sidewalk,or street;or violate City clearview triangle regulations. The City shall be responsible for maintaining all vegetation placed by the City adjacent to a public walkway, sidewalk,or street. 2.Any growth of noxious weeds or toxic vegetation shall be subject to Chapter 16-750 WAC as currently adopted and hereafter amended. B.Buildings,Structures,Fences.Buildings or portions thereof which are deemed dangerous or unfit pursuant to the SVMC(including all building and property maintenance codes and regulations as currently adopted and hereafter amended). C. Sidewalks. 1.Any protrusion,awning,or overhang that inhibits or obstructs use of a public walkway or sidewalk. 2.Any object,construction,or damage that inhibits or obstructs the surface use of a public walkway or sidewalk. 3.Accumulations of dirt or debris not removed from a public sidewalk. D.Accumulations of Materials,Garbage,Recyclables,Furniture,Machinery. 1.Building and Construction Materials.Any accumulation,stack,or pile of building or construction materials, including but not limited to metal,wood,wire,electrical,or plumbing materials,not associated with a current, in-progress project and not in a lawful storage structure or container.This provision does not apply to a designated contractor's yard. 2.Garbage,Recyclables,Compost,and Infestations. a.Garbage or recyclables not properly stored in a receptacle with a tight-fitting lid. b.Any accumulation of broken or neglected items,litter,salvage materials,or junk not in an approved enclosed structure. c.Creating or maintaining any accumulation of matter,including but not limited to foodstuffs or dead vegetation(excluding properly maintained residential compost piles). 3.Furniture,Appliances,Furnishings,and Equipment. a.Any broken or discarded household furniture,furnishings,equipment,or appliance not in an approved enclosed structure. b.Any enclosure which may entrap a human or an animal, including accessible refrigeration appliances that have not had the doors secured or removed. 4.Machinery and Equipment.Any broken or inoperable accumulation of,or part of,machinery or equipment not in an approved enclosed structure. SVMC 7.05.040(D)(4)shall include such machinery and equipment as boats,jet-skis,snowmobiles,aircraft,and the like,but shall not include junk vehicles,which are regulated pursuant to SVMC 7.05.040(N). E.Fire Hazards.Any stack or accumulation of newspapers,dead vegetation(excluding properly maintained compost piles),overgrown vegetation,cardboard,or any other paper,cloth,or wood products left in a manner that poses a substantial risk of combustion or the spread of fire,as determined by the fire marshal. Page 3 of 15 DRAFT F.Toxic or Caustic Substances.Improper storage or keeping of any toxic, flammable,or caustic substances or materials. G. Smoke,Soot,or Odors.Allowing the escape or emission of any harmful smoke,soot,fumes,gases,or odors which are offensive or harmful to a reasonable person. H.Bodies of Water. 1.All stagnant,pooled water in which mosquitoes,flies,or other insects may multiply,excluding any City- approved structure related to storm drainage systems. 2.The polluting of any waterway,well,or body of water which is not subject to the jurisdiction of another federal,state,county,special purpose district or city agency. I.Holes.Any excavated or naturally occurring uncovered holes which are not marked,guarded,or otherwise secured,and which constitute a concealed danger. J.Attractive Nuisances.Any accessible nuisance which is attractive to children including,but not limited to, unattended machinery or equipment,unsecured abandoned or vacant buildings,open and unattended vehicle trunks, or other unguarded conditions or situations that could injure or trap a child. K.Noise. 1.Any noise or sound that,originating within a residential zone,intrudes into the property of another person that exceeds the maximum permissible noise levels pursuant to Chapter 173-60 WAC,as currently adopted and hereafter amended. Such noise or sound may include,but is not limited to,noise or sound created by use of a radio,television set,musical instrument,sound amplifier,or other device capable of producing or reproducing noise or sound;or in connection with the starting,operation,repair,rebuilding,or testing of any vehicle,off- highway machinery or equipment,or internal combustion engine. 2.The following shall be exempt from the provisions of SVMC 7.05.040(K)(1): a.Normal use of public rights-of-way; b. Sounds created by motor vehicles when regulated by Chapter 173-62 WAC; c.Sounds originating from aircraft in flight and sounds that originate at airports which are directly related to flight operations; d. Sounds created by surface carriers engaged in commerce or passenger travel by railroad; e.Sounds created by warning devices not operating continuously for more than five minutes,or bells, chimes,or carillons; f. Sounds created by safety and protective devices where noise suppression would defeat the intent of the device or is not economically feasible; g. Sounds created by emergency equipment and work necessary in the interest of law enforcement or for health,safety or welfare of the community; h. Sounds originating from officially sanctioned parades and other public events; i. Sounds created by watercraft,except to the extent that they are regulated by other City or state regulations; j. Sounds created by motor vehicles licensed or unlicensed when operated off public highways,except when such sounds are made in or adjacent to residential property where human beings reside or sleep; Page 4 of 15 DRAFT k. Sounds originating from existing natural gas transmission and distribution facilities; 1. Sounds created in conjunction with public work projects or public work maintenance operations executed at the cost of the federal government,state or municipality; m. Sounds created in conjunction with the collection of solid waste; n. Sounds created in conjunction with military operations or training; o. Sounds originating from organized activities occurring in public parks,playgrounds,gymnasiums, swimming pools,schools,and other public facilities and public recreational facilities during hours of operation; p. Sounds originating from agricultural activities. 3.The following shall be exempt from provisions of SVMC 7.05.040(K)(1)between the hours of 7:00 a.m.and 10:00 p.m.: a.Sounds originating from residential property relating to temporary projects for the repair or maintenance of homes,grounds,and appurtenances; b. Sounds created by the discharge of firearms on authorized shooting ranges; c.Sounds created by blasting; d. Sounds created by aircraft engine testing and maintenance not related to flight operations;provided,that aircraft testing and maintenance shall be conducted at remote sites whenever possible; e.Sounds created by the installation or repair of essential utility services. 4.The following shall be exempt from the provisions of SVMC 7.05.040(K)(1)between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m.,or when conducted beyond 1,000 feet of any residence where human beings reside and sleep at any hour: a.Sounds originating from temporary construction sites as a result of construction activity; b. Sounds originating from the quarrying,blasting and mining of minerals or materials,including,but not limited to,sand,gravel,rock and clay,as well as the primary reduction and processing of minerals or materials for concrete batching,asphalt mixing and rock crushers; c.Sounds originating from uses on properties which have been specifically conditioned to meet certain noise standards by an appropriate City hearing body. L.Dust.Any disturbance of any land area,or permitting the same,without taking affirmative measures to suppress and minimize the blowing and scattering of dust,which unreasonably interferes with the peace,comfort,or repose of a reasonable person.This provision does not include permitted agricultural activities. M.Yard Sales.The holding or permitting of either: 1.A yard sale on the same lot for(a)more than seven consecutive days;(b)more than two consecutive weekends;or 2.More than three separate yard sale events in one calendar year. The prohibition under this Section SVMC 7.05.040(M)shall only apply to dwellings,including but not limited to single family,multifamily,and duplex dwellings. N. Camping on Private Property. Camping on private property,including the use of tents and similar membrane structures,sheds,and similar rigid structures,trailers,vehicles,and recreational vehicles,and similar items for the Page 5 of 15 D RAFT purposes of sleeping,eating,cooking,sanitation,or other activities consistent with a dwelling unit on private property. SVMC 7.05.040(N)does not apply to: 1.Legally established campgrounds and RV parks. 2.Temporary use of a recreational vehicle with a valid City of Spokane Valley Temporary Use Permit pursuant to SVMC 19.65.130 and SVMC 19.160.040. 3.Periodic short-tenn use of a tent for camping purposes as part of an event,such as a children's birthday party,where there exists a legally established habitable residence. For the purposes of this section,short-tern use shall be period of time not exceeding(*)consecutive hours nor more than(*)occurrences per calendar year. O.Improper Vehicle Parking and Storage. This shall not include legally established parking lots,outdoor storage areas,self-storage facilities,and similar permitted uses pursuant to chapters 19.60 and 22.50 SVMC,nor where a Temporary Use Permit has been issued pursuant to chapter 19.160 SVMC. 1.Vehicle storage and parking areas are permitted on residential properties as an accessory use to a legally established use. 2.Vehicles,whether operable or not,shall not be parked or stored within the required side or rear yards and, where parked or stored in the front yard,the parking/storage area shall be fully contained on private property and surfaced pursuant to SVMC 22.50.020. 3.Nor more than(*)parked or stored vehicles may be visible from the public right-of-way. Where parking/storage areas for vehicles in excess of(*)are visible from the public right-of-way,the areas shall be screened with a 6' high sight-obscuring fence or equivalent. 4.Parking or storage of more than(*)recreational vehicles on a residential property is prohibited unless parked or stored on a parcel of greater than one acre in size,in which case(*)recreational vehicles may be parked and/or stored on the property. NP.Junk Vehicles.All junk vehicles,or parts thereof,placed,stored,or permitted to be located on private property within the City limits. SVMC 7.05.040(N)does not apply to: 1.Any vehicle or part thereof that is completely enclosed within a lawful structure so that it is not visible from the street or other public or private property; 2.Any vehicle or part thereof that is stored or parked in a lawful manner on private property in connection with the business of a licensed dismantler or licensed vehicle dealer,and the private property is fenced pursuant to RCW 46.80.130; 3.A junk vehicle does not include a vehicle which is in the process of being-repaired, as evidenced by the good faith efforts of the vehicle owner.This exception shall include having-up to one"parts"vehicle, from which parts are being-salvaged concurrent with the repair process for the vehicle being-excepted from compliance in this section.Good faith efforts of repair may include producing invoices showing work or parts purchased for repair or renovation within 30 days prior to issuance of the notice of violation,or a declaration under penalty of perjury that the vehicle is in the process of being-repaired and has been worked on within 30 days prior to issuance of the notice of violation.This exception allows up to 60 days for good faith repair.Upon good cause shown,the city manager or designee shall have the discretion to grant one additional 60 day exception period pursuant to SVMC 7.05.010(N).Under no circumstance shall any good faith efforts of repair extend for more than 120 days, after which time this exception shall no longer apply.This exception shall apply to one vehicle and one parts vehicle per parcel of land per calendar year; 1.There shall be allowed as exceptions to SVMC 7.05.010(N)up to two junk vehicles in R 1,R 2,and R 3 zones,so long as they are completely sight screened by maintained landscaping, a maintained landscaped berm, Page 6 of 15 DRAFT QQ.Graffiti.Any graffiti on public or private property. RP.Development Code Violations.Any violation pursuant to SVMC Titles 19,20,21,22,23,24,and/or 25.. Page 7 of 15 DRAFT Chapter 19.65 SUPPLEMENTAL USE REGULATIONS Sections: 19.65.010 Purpose. 19.65.020 Agriculture and animal. 19.65.030 Communication facilities. 19.65.035 Community services. 19.65.040 Eating and drinking establishment. 19.65.050 Entertainment. 19.65.060 Industrial,heavy. 19.65.070 Industrial,light. 19.65.080 Lodging. 19.65.090 Marijuana uses. 19.65.100 Medical. 19.65.110 Office. 19.65.120 Public/quasi-public. 19.65.130 Residential. 19.65.140 Retail sales and service. 19.65.150 Transportation. 19.65.160 Vehicle services. 19.65.170 Warehouse,wholesale,and freight movement. 19.65.180 Uncategorized uses. 19.65.010 Purpose. The supplemental use regulations address standards for certain uses which require additional controls in order to protect public health,safety,and welfare.The regulations in Chapter 19.65 SVMC supplement the building and site development standards found in Chapter 19.70 SVMC,Density and Dimensions. 19.65.130 Residential. A.Accessory Structures. 1.The combined building footprint of all accessory permanent structures in residential zoning districts shall be: a.Up to 1,000 square feet for parcels up to 10,000 square feet in size;or b.Up to 10 percent of the lot size for parcels greater than 10,000 square feet in size. 2.Cargo shipping containers and similar enclosures are not a permitted accessory structure in any residential zoning district. B. Dwelling,Accessory Units.Accessory dwelling units shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 19.40 SVMC, Alternative Residential Development Options. C. Dwelling,Caretaker's Residence.A caretaker's residence is limited to custodial,maintenance,management,or security of a commercial property and is only allowed accessory to another permitted use on site. D.Dwelling,Cottages.Cottages shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 19.40 SVMC,Alternative Residential Development Options. E.Dwelling,Duplex.Duplex dwelling units shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 19.40 SVMC,Alternative Residential Development Options. F.Dwelling,Industrial Accessory Dwelling Units.Industrial accessory dwelling units shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 19.40 SVMC,Alternative Residential Development Options. Page 8 of 15 DRAFT G.Dwelling,Townhouse.Townhouse dwelling units shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 19.40 SVMC, Alternative Residential Development Options. H.Manufactured Homes on Individual Lots.Manufactured homes on individual lots shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 19.40 SVMC,Alternative Residential Development Options. I.Manufactured Home Park.Manufactured home parks shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 19.40 SVMC, Alternative Residential Development Options. J.Recreational Vehicles. 1.Recreational vehicles shall not be used as permanent or temporary dwelling units in any residential zone, except as permitted pursuant to Chapter 19.40 SVMC; 2.A recreational vehicle shall not be parked within a required front yard setback for more than 15 consecutive days and not more than 30 days cumulative in any 12 consecutive months;and 3.Upon issuance of a Temporary Use Permit pursuant to 19.160 SVMC,Gguests may park and/or occupy a recreational vehicle while visiting the occupants of a dwelling unit located on the same lot for not more than 44(*)days in one consecutive 12-month period. 4.Upon issuance of a Temporary Use Permit pursuant to 19.160 SVMC,applicants may utilize a recreational vehicle as temporary living quarters over the duration of construction activities related to a residence or otherwise legally permitted use of right,provided the applicant has an active building permit on file with the City of Spokane Valley. Page 9 of 15 DRAFT Chapter 22.50 OFF-STREET PARKING AND LOADING STANDARDS Sections: 22.50.010 Purpose. 22.50.020 Vehicle parking. 22.50.030 Off-street loading. 22.50.040 Bicycle parking. 22.50.050 Landscaping in parking areas. 22.50.010 Purpose. The purpose of Chapter 22.50 SVMC is to provide adequate parking,pedestrian facilities,and access for safe on-site circulation for motorists,bicyclists,and pedestrians. 22.50.020 Vehicle parking. A.The number of required off-street parking spaces shall be based on the following: 1."Gross square feet"shall mean the total area of the specific use. 2.Where fractional spaces result,the parking spaces required shall be rounded to the nearest whole number. 3.Uses not specified in Table 22.50-1 shall provide parking based on a use of similar nature. 4.Off-street vehicle parking shall be provided prior to occupancy pursuant to Table 22.50-1 for: a.A new structure based on the proposed use; b.An expanded(enlarged)floor area based on the expanded square footage;or c.An existing structure that requires a change of occupancy based on the proposed use. 5.In the case of multiple-use occupancies,other than shopping centers,the total requirement for off-street parking shall be the sum of the requirements for the various uses computed separately. 6.All driveways,off-street parking,maneuvering,loading,and storage areas shall be paved.An exemption for this requirement may be approved for loading and storage areas in the industrial zones when they are routinely used by cleated and other heavy equipment.Paving shall consist of asphalt or Portland cement.Grasscrete, paver blocks,or other equivalent hard surface material may be used for residential driveways and residential off-street parking areas. 7.The city manager or designee may allow a reduction up to 25 percent when the applicant makes a written request demonstrating site conditions that prohibit compliance with these requirements. 8.In the neighborhood commercial zoning district,a use occupying a structure with a floor area of up to: a.Three thousand square feet shall only be required to provide one accessible off-street parking space pursuant to SVMC 22.50.020(G). b.Five thousand square feet shall provide off-street parking spaces for the amount of floor area in excess of 3,000 square feet.For example,the parking requirement for a 4,000-square-foot building shall be based on 1,000 square feet of floor area. 9.Nonresidential projects located within half a mile of a frequent transit route may reduce their required parking up to 25 percent. B. Location of Parking Spaces. Page 10 of 15 DRAFT 1.For nonresidential uses,required off-street parking shall be located in a zone which allows the use that requires the parking. 2.For residential uses,including multifamily residential uses,required parking spaces shall be accessible to all authorized occupants and guests of the facility. Parking spaces which require a separate fee for use or parking spaces located within individual enclosed garages shall not be counted when determining the number of provided parking spaces required pursuant to Table 22.50-1. 23.Required off-street parking shall be located on the same parcel with the use served unless a joint parking agreement is executed in a form acceptable to the City,stating that the parcel is devoted in whole or in part for the required parking.The agreement shall be binding on both properties and shall be recorded with the Spokane County auditor. 44.Required off-street parking shall not be separated from the use by an arterial street unless approved by the city manager or designee. Table 22.50-1—Required Parking Spaces for Specific Uses Use Required Parking Agriculture and Animal Animal processing/handling 1 per staff on largest shift Greenhouse/nursery,commercial 1 per 500 gross square feet Community Services Church,temple,mosque,synagogue and house of worship 1 per 4 fixed seats or 1 per 150 square feet of floor area Community hall,club or lodge 1 per 350 gross square feet Funeral home 1 per 500 gross square feet Day Care Day care,adult and child 1 per 500 gross square feet Eating and Drinking Establishment Brewery,winery and/or distillery 1 per 1,000 gross square feet Espresso establishment,restaurant,tavern/night club,tasting room 1 per 250 gross square feet,min.of 2 Education Schools,college or university 1 per 600 gross square feet of classroom and 1 per 5 seats in principal assembly room Schools,K through 8 1 per classroom Schools,9 through 12 7 per classroom Schools,professional,vocational and trade 1 per 600 gross square feet Schools,specialized training studios 1 per 350 gross square feet Entertainment Casino 1 per 350 gross square feet Cultural facilities 1 per 800 gross square feet Major event entertainment and indoor theaters 1 per 4 fixed seats or 1 per 150 square feet of floor area Page 11 of 15 DRAFT Use Required Parking Recreation facility,indoor 1 per 350 gross square feet Recreation facility,outdoor 20 per acre of site Group Living Assisted living facility/convalescent/nursing home 1 per 4 residents plus 1 per staff on largest shift Community residential facility 1 per 4 residents Dwelling,congregate 1 per sleeping room Industrial,Light and Heavy Assembly/manufacturing/processing,light 1 per 600 gross square feet Assembly/manufacturing/processing,heavy 1 per 1,000 gross square feet Industrial service 1 per 1,000 gross square feet Wrecking,recycling,junk and salvage yards 1 per 2,000 gross square feet Lodging Bed and breakfast,hotel/motel 1 per guest room and 1 per staff on largest shift Medical Hospital 1 per 500 gross square feet Medical/dental clinic Two or less professionals 1 per 500 gross square feet Three or more professionals 1 per 350 gross square feet Office Animal clinic/veterinary 1 per 500 gross square feet Call center 1 per 250 gross square feet Office,professional and general 1 per 500 gross square feet Residential Dwelling,accessory units 1 per dwelling unit Dwelling,multifamily,studio and one bedroom 1 per dwelling unit,plus 5%of total for guests Dwelling,multifamily,two or more bedrooms 1.5 per dwelling unit,plus 5%of total for guests Dwelling,one-and two-family,townhouse 2 per dwelling unit Manufactured(mobile)home park 2 per dwelling unit plus 5%total for guest parking Retail Sales and Service Appliance and furniture sales/service 1 per 1,000 square feet of display area Banks,savings and loan,and other financial institutions,post office, 1 per 350 gross square feet postal centers,and other similar uses Building supply and home improvement 1 per 350 gross square feet Convenience store 1 per 400 gross square feet Page 12 of 15 DRAFT Use Required Parking Equipment sales,rental,maintenance and repair 1 per 1,000 gross square feet Landscape materials sales 1 per 1,000 gross square feet Personal services 1 per 350 gross square feet Retail sales,indoor,including shopping centers 1 per 350 gross square feet Retail sales,outdoor 1 per 5,000 gross square feet of display area Showroom 1 per 2,000 gross square feet Vehicle Services Automobile parts,accessories and tires 1 per 300 gross square feet Automobile/taxi rental,passenger vehicle sales,service and repair 1 per 1,000 gross square feet of building footprint and 1 per 5,000 square feet of indoor/outdoor display area Automobile/truck/RV/motorcycle service,painting,repair,body and 1 per 500 gross square feet fender works Boat and RV sales,and service and repair 1 per 1,000 gross square feet of building footprint and 1 per 5,000 square feet of indoor/outdoor display area Car wash,self-service 1 per 500 gross square feet Fueling station 1 per 4 pumps Warehouse,Wholesale,and Freight Movement Freight forwarding 1 per 2,000 gross square feet Storage,general indoors,warehouse 1 per 3,500 gross square feet Storage,general outdoors,display 1 per 1,500 gross square feet C.Off-street parking design shall be pursuant to Table 22.50-2 and Figure 22.50-1. Table 22.50-2—Parking Minimum Design Requirements Standards Parking Angle(in degrees) Stall Projection Minimum Stall Minimum Stall Minimum Aisle Width Width Depth D A SP B C One-Way Two-Way 0(parallel) 22' 22' 8'6" 20' 20' 45 12' 8'6" 17'6" 20' 20' 60 9'6" 8'6" 19' 20' 20' 75 8'10" 8'6" 19' 20' 22' 90 8'6" 8'6" 18' 20' 22'6" Page 13 of 15 DRAFT Figure 22.50-1—Calculation of Parking Spaces 111.1 111 D.Compact Car Allowance. 1.A maximum of 30 percent of the total required off-street parking stalls may be permitted and designated for compact cars. 2.Each compact stall shall be marked with the word"COMPACT"printed onto the stall and maintained as such over the life of the use of both the space and the adjacent structure it serves. 3.Dimensions of compact parking stalls shall be eight feet by 17 feet. 4.Compact spaces shall be designated in one specific area of the off-street parking facility. E.Carpool/Vanpool Parking.New office and industrial uses with 50 or more required parking spaces shall designate at least five percent of the spaces for employee carpool or vanpool parking.Employee carpool and vanpool parking shall be located closer to the building entrance or the employee entrance than other employee parking with the exception of accessible parking.The carpool/vanpool spaces shall be clearly marked"Reserved Carpool/Vanpool Only." F.All traffic circulation lanes and fire lanes shall be maintained free and clear of merchandise,carts and any other materials to allow for emergency access. G.Accessible Parking.The intent of SVMC 22.50.020(G)is to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act by allowing a person with a physical disability to independently get to a site,facility,building,or element(American National Standards Institute,Inc.). Page 14 of 15 DRAFT 1.Location.Accessible parking spaces shall be located on the shortest accessible route of travel from adjacent parking to an accessible building entrance.Where buildings have multiple accessible entrances with adjacent parking,accessible parking spaces shall be dispersed and located near the accessible entrances. 2.Hospital Outpatient Facilities.Ten percent of patient and visitor parking spaces provided shall be accessible. 3.Rehabilitation Facilities and Outpatient Physical Therapy Facilities.Twenty percent but not less than one of the portion of patient and visitor parking spaces shall be accessible. 4.Van Spaces.For every six or fraction of six accessible parking spaces,at least one shall be a van-accessible parking space. Figure 22.50-2 [ I,I a . J � 5.Accessible car and van parking space size shall be as follows: a.Car parking spaces shall be eight feet minimum in width. b.Van parking spaces shall be 11 feet minimum in width.Van parking spaces shall be permitted to be a minimum of eight feet in width where the adjacent access aisle is a minimum of eight feet in width. Table 22.50-3—Accessible Parking Spaces Required Total Parking Spaces Minimum Number of Accessible Provided Spaces 1 to 100 1,plus one for every 25 or fraction thereof 101 to 200 5,plus one for every 50 or fraction thereof 201 to 500 7,plus one for every 100 or fraction thereof 501 to 1,000 2%of total More than 1,000 20,plus one for every 100 over 1,000 H.Off-street parking shall comply with state law requirements regarding electric vehicle infrastructure including, but not limited to,Chapters 19.27 and 19.28 RCW,WAC 51-50-0427,and RCW 46.08.185,as now adopted or hereafter amended. Page 15 of 15 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: May 3,2022 Department Director Approval Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ® admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: 2022 Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendments—Admin Report GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 36.70A, SVMC 17.80.140 and 19.30.010 PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: On December 13,2016, City Council approved Ordinance 16-018 adopting the Comprehensive Plan and associated development regulations as required every eight years. On November 23, 2021, the City Council approved the 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Docket. BACKGROUND: The GMA (Growth Management Act) allows local jurisdictions to consider amendments to their Comprehensive Plans once each year. The City codified this process in Section 17.80.140 of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC). Consistent with the SVMC, staff published notice on August 20 and 27, 2021, advising the public of the annual amendment process and that the City would accept applications for the 2022 cycle through November 1,2021. On November 23, 2021, the City Council approved the 2022 Docket. The Docket includes four proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan: three site specific map amendments and an amendment to Figure 27 adding a proposed shared use path. On January 14, 2022, the City issued Determinations of Non-significance (DNS) for the proposed comprehensive plan amendments pursuant to Title 21, Environmental Controls of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code. On February 11 and 18, 2022,notice for a public hearing on the proposed amendments was placed in the Spokane Valley News Herald. Beginning on February 17, 2022, each site subject to an amendment was posted with a "Notice of Public Hearing" sign with a description of the proposal and information on the public hearing. On February 24,2022,the Planning Commission held a study session on the proposed 2022 Comprehensive Plan amendments. A public hearing on the proposed amendments was held March 10, 2022. Following the public hearing,the Planning Commission deliberated on each proposed CPA.On March 24,2022 the Planning Commission voted on the Findings and Recommendation to recommend that the City Council approve CPA-2022-01, CPA-2022-02, CPA-2022-03, and CPA-2022-04. The Findings and Recommendation are included in the Yellow Binder. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS:None OPTIONS: The City Council may accept,deny,or modify the Planning Commission recommendations.If the Council chooses to modify a proposal and the modifications are substantial,the City Council must either conduct a public hearing or refer the proposal back to the Planning Commission for further consideration. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Consensus to proceed to a first reading of the ordinances accepting the recommendations of the Planning Commission. STAFF CONTACT: Chaz Bates,AICP,Planning Manager ATTACHMENTS: PowerPoint Presentation; Separate Yellow Binder 1 of 1 2022 Comprehensive Amendments City Council Administrative Report May 3, 2022 Chaz Bates, Planning Manager Spokane .,t Valley Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment Timeline 1 Application Docket PlanningCommission City Council A • Closing notice • Council • Study Admin Report — 8/20 & Admin Report Session 5/3/22 27/2021 — 11/16/21 — 2/24/22 • 1st Reading • Pre-app • Council • Public 5 10 22 Hearing / / • 2022 Closed Motion — - 2nd Reading 3/10/22 — 11/1/21 — 11/23/21 • Findings 5/24/22 l i ` i � — 3/24/22 � � 05/03/2022 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendments-CC Admin Report 2 Notice of Public Hearing Published in paper `—E axwefrAve 2-11-2022 & 2-18-2022 ,� - Posted on property Ar r r we7 r - - ' =. 2-22-2022 Mailed to property owners 2-18-2022 II n - 4�I � , p e,.0-00 r,f7,- /err rortA E,Baorre Ave di ,� ! . Legend IM Project Site A A 400 foot buffer I� I I I 1EUesmet Ave E Desmet Ave 1( 1 1 I I I I I I I I _ ') / I 05/03/2022 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendments-CC Admin Report Amendment Materials Yellow Binder - PC Findings and Recommendation PINY PT.n Staff Reports td-i f e4. Application materials �� "' ,, � . Maps -_ �. City of Spokane Valley S E PA Checklist Annual C©mprehensive plan Notices Amendments Agency comments Spo .d�, p kane Public comments ,,,,iva1.ey 10210 E.Sprague Avenue — - Supplemental documents ; ' ` •+y ^ • 05/03/2022 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendments-CC Admin Report 4 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Docket File Number Location Type / Who Description CPA-2022-01 10506 E 10th Map / Private Change 1.03 acres from SFR to MFR CPA-2022-02 17105 E Montgomery Map / City Change .45 acres from SFR to P/OS CPA-2022-03 44th and Bates Map / City Change 17.64 acres from SFR to P/OS Bike and Pedestrian CPA-2022-04 Map Figure 27 Map / City Add proposed north river loop trail to Figure 27. 05/03/2022 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendments-CC Admin Report CPA-2022-01 - Privately Initiated Map Amendment Proposed Comprehensive Plan Map Applicant: Land Use Solutions I ti , a E 9th Ave E 99th Ave Owner: Sunshine Health Facilities I Application Area Amendment: Change from Single Family E1.othAve E loth Ave Residential (SFR) to Multiple Family I a . Residential (MFR) E llth=1n. O Elith Ave vn Planning Commission Recommendation: E 12th Ave 6-1 majority to forward to City Council a Legend recommendation of approval. E E 13th Ave ME iCMU-MFR-RCS i =Mu -RC IMU -NC SFR s I-LI�r-1 , m o ..n ton zno :aon non � Feet w I I i i I Flle:CPA-2022.01 Co,p P•Q t Map o n Plod R-SFR MFR Zonrry 0.9ap:R-3 to MFR 05/03/2022 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendments-CC Admin Report 6 CPA-2022-01 - Application Analysis ___ ., _ , _, . ,. .,,,,,,„ : ,.... _,, Expands the MFR by 1.03 ac y ra.r, i'' 41 No critical areas 1: ` � \ r ,���P .� �t, r s Supports redevelopment of ` � = "��' �` vacant properties Supported by transportation network Compatible with adjacent t a•. uses 4. yr Increasing need for seniors and assisted living facilities 05/03/2022 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendments-CC Admin Report CPA-2022-02 - City Initiated Map Amendment Proposed Comprehensive Plan Map Applicant: Spokane Valley 9,6 -di ota Owner: Spokane Valley Spokane Application Area Amendment: Change from Single Family meotte 111 Residential (SFR) to Parks, Recreation and Open Space (P/OS) Planning Commission Recommendation: ` EMaansfield 7-0 consensus to forward to City Council �` EKnox Ave a recommendation of approval . Legend E Knox-Ln -CMU-MFR-POS I MU -RC - -IMU -NC SFR E Indiana Ave - 1 0 So aoo Fee, goo 000 _ File:CPA-2022-02 y — er gpwene verey Croposed change: P rressl:5505 OOPSEMo Comp Plan-P 2 SFR to P/OS Address 1J105EMWilgomeryAve Zoning Map (O PpS 05/03/2022 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendments-CC Admin Report 8 CPA-2022-02 - Application Analysis „, _ = , „ _ ,„ _ ,_, -,,,,_,,, Expands the P/OS by .45 ac No critical areas _ tvas, n x Area identified in Park and a n, y.. Y, Recreation Master Plan Supports Centennial Trail access andpotential river ` h ` �` _= � � k k 1 � loop trail .. , iK # , s am Compatible with , ; - r surrounding uses r fir,'k s.. _0 iti:•" xs 05/03/2022 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendments-CC Admin Report 9 CPA-2022-03 - City Initiated Map Amendment Proposed Comprehensive Plan Map Applicant: Spokane Valley E44thAve — — Owner: Spokane Valley I E Thorpe Rd Amendment: Change from Single Family Residential (SFR) to Parks, Recreation 46th and Open Space (P/OS) Itl!OMMINiti e� F Planning Commission Recommendation: 47th E47th Ave y 6-1 majority to forward to City Council a I Application Area — . Legend recommendation of approval . P�� d$`o. , 7 ®;MumMFR—R°S I -, IMU -NC SFR / Na ��� A Fee File:CPA•2022.03 ly OwneojliOa Valingli”a'39:U ' Plan Map:SFR to ROS ,9048 oaf.ofos ae[wrofai as f o nc Map_R2 to Pos Address Uh CGOessetl CJOG f900] 05/03/2022 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendments-CC Admin Report 10 CPA-2022-03 - Application Analysis . j ,, . rot . ..,. ..... Expands the P/OS by17.64 ac �'' '� � Supports Park Level of Service � fi �y Newly acquired property fora parks 1 Provides park space to the ' - neighborhood = _ " • . w r 8 05/03/2022 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendments-CC Admin Report CPA-2022-04 - City Initiated Map Amendment Figure 27 Map of Exisiting and 5°..��„�..,,���, .„„� Recommended&kyle Facilities Applicant: Spokane Valley �� ewa Proposed Amendment e wamvm�oan iI �Y °"'°pm'sl Proposed Shared Use Path '.. Owner: Spokane Valley „. ° � \.� zI „ E'�"�&Pos" '.,, i_° ��fi —.-•-�LT.. Bikeway Network 1 — 2 M pal Anl.daries i--\_ r c Cr Ik A ea.I.C., Amendment: Amend Figure �d ...Idj � � o akway;El orr=�r° 27 - Existing and �} � �•YJpb°.. _ = F_Z_ Eur°ia.ve ; pEEtEt �� e 1I. a ! - i L '''°44�rN E ; a • f SY' 8 Recom mended Bicycle I __ "t► Facilities .�-____________ �� _ _ �� Line Added PlanningCommission e � C. P J Recommendation: 7-0 14� tl r-- consensus to forward to City Pre,. •r242...v Wk_°.w°ry °Council a recommendation 1 _ of a p p rova I. --=W°° 05/03/2022 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendments-CC Admin Report 12 CPA-2022-04 - Application Analysis ____ .,\..._ Spokane Valley River Loop Trail T.S16.5 million Identified in 2019 Spokane FUNDING REQUES Park ka1Iev Tire Spokane Valley River Loop Trail.a paved narrmotonzed trail arcing the Spokane River's north bank that would connect Plante's Ferry Sports Complex to two city regional parks.The proposed trail is approximately five mites long and a spak.aaevaueparg ,.. recommended project in the city's 2019 Parks and Recreation Master Plan.The trail would conned to the Centennial Trail with andRecreation Master a pedestrian bridges and improve access to the Spokane River. ,.- SPOKANE VALLEY RIVERLOOP TRAIL - .r- ..;,- Plan rn. F - -- - - Air ".- r a c. Afive-m"Ie(non mota¢ed)pawed scenic trail that would serve 6icy- � Ili, t r t runners and walkers and ,, �} . ,y —. allow access to the river s north 4REMT Ave s- .s !s side for fishermen and whtewater : it C1. ` enthrnrasts FLORA ROAD Enhances and supports i ¢ MI 11.1 - b- -" PARK PROPERTY E�wJ ' I nclude«natu s and other park to .c - Iwii-ipurt o- - =. nature future park developments — -- ta�gtb� sm hem s I4 , i_ tom.A Pede t bridge spanning ,i. ,R :z'f L -• d•_ir the river would connect the River �''s` 90.EN5 Pit w '�" ��` tm t� Loop Trail d park to Fiore Road ^ ', '•` M. and the Cerdennia4 Trai. �1 w 3 tstaiiiii init Maintains consistency �• i ` {3 e7 ^ ' PEDESTRIAN BRIDGES i 1!} , � 'i a F r • L ,e .1.. 0' 1 si"t dew . '/ p �,;. among plans y , , _ - t rFE� �w�a.�P, z % ii. � arannPuk f- Supports grants and other PINES ROAD ACCESS �,�l � r tl A new access and parking area 0111. . ■ 7''� f for sera of both the Centennial �� _. "t,+ �� nd r t funding opportunities = , r,,r .,3 t ; �ttl�i. connect the two tads a - • 05/03/2022 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendments-CC Admin Report 13 Questions CITY OF Spokane Valley® 05/03/2022 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendments-CC Admin Report 14 City of Spokane Valley 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Index Tab No. Contents 1 Request for Council Action (May 3, 2022) 2 Planning Commission Findings and Recommendations (March 24, 2022) Planning Commission Minutes 3 February 24, 2022 - Study Session March 10, 2022 - Public Hearing March 24, 2022 — Findings and Recommendations Request for Planning Commission Action and Presentations 4 February 24, 2022 - Study Session March 10, 2022 - Public Hearing March 24, 2022 — Findings and Recommendation Staff Report and Exhibits for CPA-2022-01. 5 A request to change the comprehensive plan designation and zoning for 1.03 acres Single Family Residential (SFR) to Multifamily Residential (MFR) for parcels 45204.1436 and 45204.1435 Staff Report and Exhibits for CPA-2022-02. 6 A request to change land use designation and zoning for 0.45 acres from Single Family Residential (SFR) to Parks and Open Space (POS) for parcel: 55073.0458 Staff Report and Exhibits for CPA-2022-03. 7 A request to change land use designation and zoning for 17.64 acres from Single Family Residential (SFR) to Parks and Open Space (POS) for parcels: 44041.0104; 44041.0103; 44041.0102; 44041.9048; 44041.9046; and 44041.9007 8 Staff Report and Exhibits for CPA-2022-04. A request to add north river loop trail GENERAL FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE SPOKANE VALLEY PLANNING COMMISSION FOR PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS CPA-2022-01,CPA-2022-02, CPA-2022-03,and CPA-2022-04 March 24,2022 A. Background: 1. .['he Growth Management Act (GMA) allows local jurisdictions to consider amendments to their Comprehensive Plans once each year. The City codified this process in SVMC 17.80.140.Consistent with state law and the SVMC, staff published notice on August 20 and 27,2021,advising the public of the annual amendment process and that the City would accept applications for the 2022 cycle through November 1, 2021. The notice was also sent to all agencies, organizations, and adjacent jurisdictions that may have an interest in seeking amendments to the Comprehensive Plan. 2. On November 23, 2021, the City Council approved the 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Docket. The Docket includes four proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan: three site specific map amendments and one amendment to Figure 27 — Existing and Recommended Bike Facilities map.Site specific amendments approved for a Comprehensive Plan amendment will require and receive a zoning classification amendment consistent with the new land use designation. B. Findings: 1. SVMC 17.80.140 provides the framework for the public to participate throughout the Comprehensive Plan amendment process, including notice and public hearing requirements. 2. On January 19, 2022, the Department of Commerce was provided a notice of intent to adopt amendments to the Comprehensive Plan. 3. Pursuant to the State Environmental. Policy Act,chapter 43.21 C RCW(SEPA), and Title 21 SVMC, environmental checklists were prepared for the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendments. 4. Staff reviewed the environmental checklists and issued a Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) for all Comprehensive Plan amendments on January 14, 2022. The DNS was not appealed. 5. The Planning Commission finds the procedural requirements of SEPA and Title 21 SVMC have been fulfilled. 6. On February 11 and l8, 2022, notice for a public hearing on the proposed amendments was placed in the Spokane Valley News Herald. Beginning on February 17. 2022, each site subject to an amendment was posted with a "Notice of Public Hearing'. sign with a description of the proposal and information on the public hearing. 7. Individual notice of the map amendment proposals were mailed to all property owners within 400 feet of each proposed site specific map amendment. 8. The Planning Commission reviewed the proposed amendments concurrently to evaluate the cumulative impacts. The review was consistent with the annual amendment process outlined in SVMC 17.80.140 and chapter 36.70A RCW GMA). 9. On March 10, 2022, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendments. After receiving public testimony, the Planning Commission closed the public hearing and deliberated on the Comprehensive Plan Planning Commission Findings and Recommendation CPA-2022-0 1,CPA-2022-02.CPA-2022-O3,and C"PA-2022-04 Page I of 2 amendments. While reviewing and deliberating on the Comprehensive Plan amendments, Planning Commission voted on the proposed amendments as follows: a. CPA-2022-01: 6-1 to forward to City Council a recommendation to approve. b. CPA-2022-02: 7-0 to forward to City Council a recommendation to approve. c. CPA-2022-03: 6-1 to forward to City Council a recommendation to approve. d. CPA-2022-04: 7-0 to forward to City Council a recommendation to approve. 10. The Planning Commission hereby adopts and incorporates findings specific to each Comprehensive Plan Amendment as attached (see attachments 1-4). Conclusions: The Planning Commission finds compliance with SVMC 17.80.140(H) — Comprehensive Plan Amendment Approval Criteria for CPA-2022-01, CPA-2022-02, CPA-2022-03 and CPA-2022-04. These proposed 2022 Comprehensive Plan amendments are consistent with the goals and policies of the Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan, and would promote the public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment. The Planning Commission hereby adopts and incorporates conclusions specific to each Comprehensive Plan Amendment as attached (see attachments 1-4). Recommendations: The Spokane Valley Planning Commission recommends the City Council approve 2022 Comprehensive Plan amendments CPA-2022-01,CPA-2022-02. CPA-2022-03, and CPA-2022-04. Approved this 24`'day of March, 2022. r fir, Robert McKinley, Chairman ATTEST Marianne Lemons. Planning Commission Secretary Planning Commission Findings and Recommendation CPA-2022-0I,CPA-2022-02,CPA-2022-03,and CPA-2022-04 Page 2 of 2 ATTACHMENT 1 SPECIFIC FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE SPOKANE VALLEY PLANNING COMMISSION FOR PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT-CPA-2022-01 March 24,2021 A. Background: 1. The Growth Management Act (GMA)allows local jurisdictions to consider amendments to their Comprehensive Plans once each year. The City codified this process in SVMC 17.80.140.Consistent with state law and the SVMC, staff published notice on August 20 and 27,2021,advising the public of the annual amendment process and that the City would accept applications for the 2022 cycle through November 1, 2021. The notice was also sent to all agencies, organizations, and adjacent jurisdictions that may have an interest in seeking amendments to the Comprehensive Plan, 2. On November 23, 2021, the City Council approved the 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Docket. The Docket includes four proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan: three site specific map amendments and one amendment to Figure 27— Existing and Recommended Bike Facilities map. Site specific amendments approved for a Comprehensive Plan amendment will require and receive a zoning classification amendment consistent with the new land use designation. 13. Findings: 1. These findings are specific to CPA-2022-01. All findings in the general Findings and Recommendations are hereby incorporated by reference into these specific findings for CPA- 2022-01. Findings required pursuant to SVMC 17.80.140(11)(I): This proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to the public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment. The City continues to see increasing population growth with 2020 Census estimates showing a population of just over 104,500; in 2016 the estimate from the Office of Financial Management was 94,160. More recently, the City adopted a Housing Action Plan that shows that seniors(age 65+)are continuing to increase their share of the City's population. This age group includes those in need of assisted living arrangements. Based on conversations with the applicant Sunshine Health, they are requesting a change to MFR to meet future demand for multifamily development that can accommodate an assisted living facility near their existing facility to the west. The proposed change helps meet existing and future demand, helps protect the environment by building in a developed area,and helps Sunshine Health meet a needed public service in a cost-efficient manner. 2. This proposed amendment is consistent with the requirements of chapter 36.70A RCW and with the portion of the City's adopted Comprehensive Plan not affected by the amendment. The GMA adopts 14 goals to guide the development of local comprehensive plans and development regulations. The request allows opportunity to provide an assisted living facility adjacent to an existing development owned by the same entity. There are no transportation improvements planned adjacent to the site within the planning horizon of 2037. The proposal does not conflict with any other GMA goals. The amendment is not in conflict with any other portions of the Comprehensive Plan. 3. This proposed amendment is not in response to a change in conditions beyond the property owner's control. 4. This proposed amendment is not in response to or corrects an obvious mapping error. The City has experienced continued population growth,especially in age segments that(Alen seek multifamily developments(millennials and seniors). Increasing opportunity for multifamily Attachment i .Planning Cnntmission Findings and Recommendation CPA-2021-0001 Page I of 3 development in areas that are supported by existing infrastructure provides an opportunity to meet adopted goals, policies, and strategies for housing needs.This proposed amendment provides an additional tool and opportunity to meet the City's housing needs. the Comprehensive Plan identifies the following goals and policy that support the proposed change: Fi-G2 Enable the development of affordable housing for all income levels. CF-P2 Optimize the use of existing public facilities before investing in new facilities. Findings for factors required pursuant to SVMC 17.80.l t0(H)(2): 5. The effect upon the physical environment: The change to MFR would allow for expanded uses including multifamily housing and assisted living facilities. The properties would have the opportunity to transition, add density and add different uses including assisted living facilities. There is no concern on effect of physical environment. 6. The effect on open space, streams,rivers,and lakes: There are no known critical areas associated with the site, such as wetlands, fish and wildlife habitat areas, frequently flooded areas or geologically hazardous areas. The parcel is not located within the shoreline jurisdiction, and there are no known surface water quality or quantity issues. Chapter 21.40 SVMC will ensure adequate protection of critical areas. 7. The compatibility with and impact on adjacent land uses and surrounding neighborhoods: The parcels are currently vacant. A multifamily building was previously located on the northern parcel but was demolished in 2017. The adjacent use to the west is the existing Sunshine Health facility that provides a variety of health-related services including assisted living. West of the existing Sunshine Health facility is Valley Christian School; to the north, east. and south are single-family residences. All the properties except for the existing Sunshine 1 Iealth facility are designated Single Family Residential and zoned R-3. If the amendment is approved any future development would be subject to the City's transitional provision. 8. The adequacy of and impact on community facilities including utilities, roads, public transportation, parks, recreation,and schools: Raymond Road and 10th and 1 1th Avenues are Local Access streets. There arc no planned transportation projects in the area. The nearest City recreational facility is Appleway Trail, approximately '/ mile to the north. The closest formal City park is Balfour Park,approximately one mile to the north. A project on the site would be considered infill development. As such,the expansion of allowed uses and increased densities are supported by the infrastructure that is in place. Various Planning Commission members had concerns regarding adequacy of on-street parking in the area and its ability to support future uses allowed in the MFR. 9. The benefit to the neighborhood,City, and region: This proposed change would allow the property to increase density and support infill development in an area planned for urban growth. The change will support the identified need for housing. The change benefits the neighborhood, City,and region by supporting the following adopted Comprehensive Plan goals: H-G I Allow fora broad range of housing opportunities to meet the needs of the community. H-G2 Enable the development of affordable housing for all income levels. 10. The quantity and location of land planned for the proposed land use type and density and the demand for such land: Attachment l -Planning Commission Findings and Recommendation CPA-2021-0001 Page 2 ol 3 This proposal would add approximately one acre of MFR property. The MFR designation in this location would allow for increased options for development including an assisted living facility in an area adjacent to an existing facility. The proposal is limited to a reasonable area and impacts to adjacent Single Family Residential zones would be mitigated by the adopted transitional provisions. 11. The current and projected population density in the area: Currently,the site allows for 8 dwelling units pc' acre. If the proposal is approved, it would allow for up to 22 dwelling units per acre, a net increase of up to 14 dwelling units. The proposed change would have little impact on overall population density. 12. The effect upon other aspects of the Comprehensive Plan: The MFR designation would support the goals and policies identified above. The amendment will have no effect on other elements of the Comprehensive Plan, including Housing, Capital Facilities and Public Services, Public and Private Utilities, Parks and Open Space and Natural Resources. C. Conclusions: The Planning Commission finds compliance with SVMC 17.80.140(H)—Comprehensive Plan Amendment Approval Criteria for CPA-2022-01. The proposed 2021 Comprehensive Plan amendment is consistent with the goals and policies of the Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan, and would promote the public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment. D. Recommendations: The Spokane Valley Planning Commission recommends the City Council approve 2022 Comprehensive Plan amendment CPA-2022-01. Approved this 24'1`day of March, 2022. Robert McKinley, Chairman ATTEST Marianne Lemons, Planning Commission Secretary Attachment I -Planning Commission Findings and Recommendation CPA-2021-0001 Page 3 of 3 ATTACHMENT 2 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE SPOKANE VALLEY PLANNING COMMISSION FOR PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA-2022-02 March 24,2022 A. Background: 1. The Growth Management Act(GMA)allows local jurisdictions to consider amendments to their Comprehensive Plans once each year. The City codified this process in SVMC 17.80.140. Consistent with state law and the SVMC, staff published notice on August 20 and 27, 2021, advising the public of the annual amendment process,and that the City would accept applications for the 2022 cycle through November 1, 2021. The notice was also sent to all agencies, organizations,and adjacent jurisdictions that may have an interest in seeking amendments to the Comprehensive Pplan. 2. On November 23, 2021,the City Council approved the 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Docket. The Docket includes four proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan: three site specific map amendments and one amendment to Figure 27— Existing and Recommended Bike Facilities map. Site specific amendments approved for a Comprehensive Plan amendment will require and receive a zoning classification amendment consistent with the new land use designation. B. Findings: 1. These findings are specific to CPA-2022-02. All the findings made in the general Findings and Recommendations are hereby incorporated by reference into these specific findings for CPA-2022- 02 Findings required pursuant to SVM+C 17.80.140(11)(1).' 2. This proposed amendment to change the designation for .45 acres from SFR to P/OS bears a substantial relationship to the public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment. In 2021, the City purchased the parcel from Spokane County for the river loop trail project and for future access improvements to the Centennial Trail at Flora Road for the purpose of expanding/ increasing access to the City's park lands. This area was generally identified as New Park Area 6 in the 2019 Parks and Recreation Master Plan. These plans were developed through an extensive community engagement process. Additionally, the expansion is necessary to maintain the adopted Level of Service(LOS) 3.25 acres of park land for every 1,000 residents. 3. This proposed amendment is consistent with the requirements of chapter 36.70A RCW and with the portion of the City's adopted Comprehensive Plan not affected by the amendment. The GMA adopts fourteen goals to guide the development of local comprehensive plans and development regulations. The proposal is consistent with the GMA goals to enhance recreational opportunities and develop parks and recreation facilities. Additionally,the GMA requires a Parks and Recreation element to be a part of the adopted comprehensive plan. The City's Comprehensive Plan adopts the Parks Plan by reference. This proposed amendment will not have unanticipated impacts on other areas of the Comprehensive Plan. 4. This proposed amendment does not respond to a substantial change in conditions beyond the property owner's control applicable to the area within which the subject property lies. 5. This proposed amendment is not in response to or corrects an obvious mapping error. Attachment 2-Planning Commission Findings and Recommendation CPA-2022-02 Page 1 of 3 6. This proposed amendment will address a documented deficiency of park land in the Comprehensive Plan. Findings for factors required pursuant to SVMC 17,80.140(H)(22). 7. The effect upon the physical environment: The change to P/OS will not impact the physical environment. The change will result in less intensive uses than are currently allowed in SFR reducing the potential effects on the physical environment. 8. The effect on open space, streams, rivers, and lakes: According to the City's Critical Area map, the parcel is not impacted by any known critical areas, such as wetlands,fish and wildlife habitat areas,geologically hazardous areas or frequently flooded areas. The parcel is located within shoreline jurisdiction and designated in the Shoreline Master Program as Shoreline Residential Upland. There are no known surface water quality or quantity issues. Chapter 21.40 SVMC and chapter 21.50 SVMC will ensure that adequate protection of the critical areas and adjacent land shorelands are addressed at the time of future development. 9. The compatibility with and impact on adjacent land uses and surrounding neighborhoods: This proposed amendment is compatible with the surrounding land uses. Future development of the park space will remedy a documented need and location identified in the 2019 Parks and Recreation Master Plan. 10. The adequacy of and impact on community facilities including utilities. roads, public transportation,parks, recreation,and schools: Sewer and water are available to the site.The nearest formal park is Greenacres Park approximately 1.25 miles to the southeast,the Centennial Trail is immediately to the north,and across the Spokane River is the newly acquired Flora Park property. The proposal will increase park land and allow future development to access the newly-acquired Flora Park property as part of the north river loop trail proposal. The site is served by Flora Road, an Urban Major Collector. The existing and forecast Level of Service(LOS)for Flora Road at this location is A-C which is within the adopted LOS:Montgomery Avenue at this location is a local access street and does not have an adopted LOS. There are no planned capacity or preservation projects planned in this area. 11. The benefit to the neighborhood, City,and region: This proposed amendment will provide benefits to the neighborhood and City by providing an opportunity to provide access to planned improvements on the north side of the Spokane River. 12. The quantity and location of land planned for the proposed land use type and density and the demand for such land: The quantity and location of park land is planned for and needed as identified in the Parks Plan. An access point at this location furthers the goals of the Parks Plan and Comprehensive Plan and would provide easy access for pedestrians and bicycles. 13. The current and projected population density in the area: The proposed change would have minimal impact on projected population density. 14. The effect upon other aspects of'the Comprehensive Plan: Attachment 2-Planning Commission Findings and Recommendation C'PA-2022-02 Page 2 of 3 The proposal will not have an impact on other aspects of the Comprehensive Plan. In addition to meeting the goals in the Parks and Recreation Master Plan the proposed amendment addresses the following goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan: LU-G2 Provide for land uses that are essential to Spokane Valley residents, employees, and visitors. LU-P 18 Enable public open spaces. P-G I Develop, grow, and maintain a diverse and accessible park, recreation, trail, and open space system that enhances community character. P-P5 Design parks and community facilities to provide easy access for pedestrians,bicycles, autos, and public transit. P-P8 Plan for access to parks, trails, and other open spaces in all neighborhoods. C. Conclusions: The Planning Commission finds compliance with SVMC 17.80.140(H)—Comprehensive Plan Amendment Approval Criteria for CPA-2022-02.The proposed 2022 Comprehensive Plan amendment is consistent with the goals and policies of the Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan, and 'ould promote the public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment. D. Recommendations: The Spokane Valley Planning Commission recommends the City Council approve 2022 Comprehensive Plan amendment CPA-2022-02. Approved this 24'h day of March, 2022. Robert McKinley, Chui-man ATTEST Marianne Lemons, Planning Commission Secretary Attachment 2-Planning C'ommission Findings and Recommendation CPA-2022-02 Page 3 of 3 ATTACHMENT 3 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE SPOKANE VALLEY PLANNING COMMISSION FOR PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT-CPA-2022-03 March 24,2022 A. Background: 1. The Growth Management Act(GMA) allows local jurisdictions to consider amendments to their Comprehensive Plans once each year. The City codified this process in SVMC 17.80.140. Consistent with state law and the SVMC, staff published notice on August 20 and 27, 2021, advising the public of the annual amendment process and that the City would accept applications for the 2022 cycle through November 1. 2021. The notice was also sent to all agencies, organizations, and adjacent jurisdictions that may have an interest in seeking amendments to the Comprehensive Plan. 2. On November 23, 2021, the City Council approved the 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Docket. The Docket includes four proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan: three site specific map amendments and one amendment to Figure 27—Existing and Recommended Bike Facilities map. Site specific amendments approved for a Comprehensive Plan amendment will. require and receive a zoning classification amendment consistent with the new land use designation. B. Findings:. 1. These findings are specific to CPA-2022-03. All the findings made in the general Findings and Recommendations are hereby incorporated by reference into these specific findings for CPA-2022- 03. Findings required pun-snow to SVAIC 17.80.140a-0(1): 2. This proposed amendment to change the designation for 17.64 acres from SFR to P/OS bears a substantial relationship to the public health. safety, welfare, and protection of the environment. In 2021, the City purchased six parcels southeast of the intersection of 44th Avenue and Bates Road for the purpose of expanding the City's park lands. This area was identified as New Park Area 3 in the 2019 Parks and Recreation Master Plan,which was developed through an extensive community engagement process. Additionally, the expansion is necessary to maintain the adopted Level of Service(LOS) 3.25 acres of park land for every 1,000 residents. 3. This proposed amendment is consistent with the requirements of Chapter 36.70A RCW and with the portion of the City's adopted Comprehensive Plan not affected by the amendment. The GMA adopts fourteen goals to guide the development of local comprehensive plans and development regulations. This proposal is consistent with the GMA goals to enhance recreational opportunities and develop parks and recreation facilities. Additionally,the GMA requires a Parks and Recreation element to be a part of the adopted comprehensive plan.The City's Comprehensive Plan adopts the Parks Plan by reference. The proposed amendment will not have unanticipated impacts on other areas of the Comprehensive Plan. 4_ This proposed amendment does not respond to a substantial change in conditions beyond the property owner's control applicable to the area within which the subject property lies. 5. This proposed amendment is not in response to or corrects an obvious mapping error. Attachment 3 Planning Commission Findings and Recommendation CPA-2022-t13 Page I of3 6. This proposed amendment will address a documented deficiency of park land in the Comprehensive Plan. Findings,for factors required pursuant to SVMC 17.80.140(H)(?): 7. The effect upon the physical environment: The change to P/OS will not impact the physical environment. 1'he change will result in less intensive uses than are currently allowed in SFR reducing the potential effects on the physical environment. 8. The effect on open apace, streams, rivers,and lakes: According to the City's Critical Area map, the eastern parcels are within a Geological Hazardous area identified as Quanternary Alluvium, development of the site may require additional report or studies. 'There are no known other critical areas associated NI,ith the site, such as wetlands, fish and wildlife habitat areas, or frequently flooded areas. The parcels are not located within shoreline jurisdiction,and there are no known surface water quality or quantity issues. Chapter 21.40 SVMC will ensure that adequate protection of the critical areas and adjacent land use are addressed at the time of future development. 9. The compatibility with and impact on adjacent land uses and surrounding neighborhoods: This proposed amendment is compatible with the surrounding land uses. Future development of the park space will provide a documented need and location identified in the 2019 Parks and Recreation Master Plan. I0. The adequacy of and impact on community facilities including utilities, roads, public transportation,parks, recreation,and schools: Sewer and water are available to the site. The nearest formal park is Castle Park approximately 2 miles to the north, the Glenrosc Unit of Dishman Hills is approximately 1.5 miles to west. The proposal will increase park land and future development will enhance the park system helping maintain the adopted LOS. 11. The benefit to the neighborhood, City, and regions This proposed amendment will provide benefits to the neighborhood and City by providing an opportunity- to provide park space to the neighborhood. The expansion of park space in this area will help the City meet its adopted LOS for park land. A minority of the Planning Commission had concerns with the potential location of a new fire station across the street from the existing fire station and the potential impact on the newly acquired park property. 12. The quantity and location of land planned for the pre poscd land use type and density and the demand for such land: The quantity and location of park land is planned for and needed as identified in the Parks Plan. A neighborhood park at this location furthers the goals of the Parks Plan and Comprehensive Plan. The site provides easy access for pedestrians, bicycles,and automobiles. 13. The current and projected population density in the area: This proposed change would have minimal impact on projected population density. 14. The effect upon other aspects of the Comprehensive Plan: Attachment 3-Planning Commission I findings and Recommendation( Pe\-2022-03 1'aic 2 of 3 The proposal will not have an impact on other aspects of the Comprehensive Plan, In addition to meeting the goals in the Parks and Recreation Master Plan the proposed amendment addresses the following goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan: LU-G2 Provide for land uses that are essential to Spokane Valley residents, employees, and visitors. LU-P 18 Enable public open spaces, P-Gl Develop,grow,and maintain a diverse and accessible park,recreation,trail,and open space system that enhances community character. P-P5 Design parks and community facilities to provide easy access for pedestrians, bicycles, autos, and public transit. P-P8 Plan for access to parks, trails,and other open spaces in all neighborhoods. C. Conclusions: The Planning Commission finds compliance with SVMC 17.80.140(H)—Comprehensive Plan Amendment Approval Criteria for CPA-2022-03.The proposed 2022 Comprehensive Plan amendment is consistent with the goals and policies of the Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan, and would promote the public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment. D. Recommendations: The Spokane Valley Planning Commission recommends the City Council approve 2022 Comprehensive Plan amendment CPA-2022-03. Approved this 24" day of March,2022. Robert McKinley, Chairman ATTEST Marianne Lemons, Planning Commission Secretary Attachment 3-Planning Commission Findings and Recommendation CPA-2022-03 Page 3 of 3 ATTACHMENT 4 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE SPOKANE VALLEY PLANNING COMMISSION FOR PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA-2022-04 March 24,2022 A. Background: 1. The Growth Management Act(GMA)allows local jurisdictions to consider amendments to their Comprehensive Plans once each year. The City codified this process in SVMC 17.80.140. Consistent with state law and the SVMC, staff published notice on August 20 and 27, 2021, advising the public of the annual amendment process and that the City would accept applications for the 2022 cycle through November 1, 2021. The notice was also sent to all agencies, organizations,and adjacent jurisdictions that may have an interest in seeking amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan. 2. On November 23. 2021, the City Council approved the 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Docket. The Docket includes four proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan: three site specific map amendments and one amendment to Figure 27— existing and Recommended Bike Facilities map. Site specific amendments approved for a Comprehensive Plan amendment will require and receive a zoning classification amendment consistent with the new land use designation. B. Findings: I. These findings are specific to CPA-2022-04. All the findings made in the general Findings and Recommendations arc hereby incorporated by reference into these specific findings for CPA-2022- 04. Findings required pursuant ere SVMC 17.8a140(H)(1): 2. This proposed amendment amends Figure 27 — Existing and Recommended Bicycle Facilities. Figure 27 identifies planned shared use paths. In 2019 the City updated the Park and Recreation Master Plan, which identified a potential New Park Area 6 for a new community park on the north bank of the Spokane River between Flora and Barker Road,as well as a potential trail running from Plante's Ferry to the new park. In 2021, the City acquired approximately 45 acres of north bank property for a new park. This proposed amendment formally adopts the proposed north river loop trail into the Comprehensive Plan as contemplated in the Park and Recreation Master Plan. The public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment are furthered by ensuring the Comprehensive Plan is reflective of regional policy and current with other plans. 3. This proposed amendment is consistent with the requirements of chapter 36.70A RCW and with the portion of the City's adopted.Comprehensive Plan not affected by the amendment.The(GMA) adopts fourteen goals to guide the development of local comprehensive plans and development regulations. This proposal is consistent with the GMA goals to enhance recreational opportunities and develop parks and recreation facilities. Additionally,the GMA requires a Parks and Recreation element to be a part of the adopted comprehensive plan.The City's Comprehensive Plan adopts the Parks Plan by reference. This proposed amendment will not have unanticipated impacts on other areas of the Comprehensive Plan 4. This proposed amendment does not respond to a substantial change in conditions beyond the property owner's control. Attachment 4-Planning Commission Findings and Recommendation CPA-2022-04 Page 1 of3 5. This proposed amendment is not in response to an obvious mapping error. However, with the adoption of the Parks and Recreation Master Plan in 2019 and the property acquisition of the Flora property in 2021, the proposed amendment will add the north river loop trail as discussed in the Park Plan and community engagement efforts. 6. This proposed amendment will address a documented deficiency of park land in the Comprehensive Plan. Findings for Factors required pursuant to SVMC: 17,80.140(H)(2): 7. The effect upon the physical environment: This amendment is not site specific as the physical location of the trail has not been formally identified and the change would not result in effects to the natural environment.The City's critical areas provisions(chapter 21.40 SVMC) and shoreline master program (chapter 21.50 SVMC) will ensure that adequate protection of the critical areas and adjacent shorelands are addressed at the time of future development.There are no known surface water quality or quantity issues. 8. The effect on open space, streams, rivers, and lakes: 'the proposed policies will not have a direct effect on open space,streams,rivers,or lakes. Chapter 21.40 SVMC will ensure that adequate protection of the critical areas and adjacent land use are addressed for any future development. 10. The compatibility with and impact on adjacent land uses and surrounding neighborhoods: This proposed amendment is compatible with the surrounding land uses. Generally, the potential location of the trail is within park designated property. 11. The adequacy of and impact on community facilities including utilities, roads, public transportation,parks, recreation, and schools: This is a non-site-specific amendment. While the exact location of the potential trail has not been identified, the availability of sewer and water vary, certain potential trailheads may have public services. It is expected that the trail, should it be developed, would function in a similar fashion as the Centennial Trail, with some areas remote and lacking services while others are accessible with public services available. 12. The benefit to the neighborhood, City, and region: This proposed amendment will provide benefits to the neighborhood and City by providing an opportunity to provide access to the Spokane River and recreational opportunities along on the north side of the Spokane River. 13. The quantity and location of land planned for the proposed land use type and density and the demand for such land: The City has not adopted a Level-of-Service (1.0S) ratio for trails; however, the 2019 Park and Recreation Master Plan identifies that the City will take advantage of recreational opportunities as they arise, and the Comprehensive Plan identifies access to the Spokane River as an opportunity. This location along the north bank of the Spokane River offers a unique chance to take advantage of this opportunity. 14. The current and projected population density in the area: The proposed amendment will not have an impact on current or projected population. 15. The effect upon other aspects of the Comprehensive Plan: Attachment 4-Planning Commission Findings and Recommendation CPA-2022-04 Page 2 of 3 The proposal will not have an impact on other aspects of the Comprehensive Plan. In addition to meeting the goals in the Parks and Recreation Master Plan the proposed amendment addresses the following goals, policies, and strategy of the Comprehensive Plan: LU-G2 Provide for land uses that are essential to Spokane Valley residents, employees, and visitors. LU-Pl8 Enable public open spaces. P-G I Develop,grow,and maintain a diverse and accessible park,recreation,trail,and open space system that enhances community character. P-P5 Design parks and community facilities to provide easy access for pedestrians, bicycles, autos, and public transit. P-P8 Plan for access to parks, trails, and other open spaces in all neighborhoods. Strategy: Evaluate the feasibility of developing a public park along the Spokane River. A. Conclusions: The Planning Commission finds compliance with SVMC 17.80.140(H)—Comprehensive Plan Amendment Approval Criteria for CPA-2022-04.The proposed 2022 Comprehensive Plan amendment is consistent with the goals and policies of the Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan, and would promote the public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment. B. Recommendations: The Spokane Valley Planning Commission recommends the City Council approve 2022 Comprehensive Plan amendment CPA-2022-0004. Approved this 24t'' day of March. 2022. ,,,--...: -"-,,,,,-<.':")''-r,;j, --7"/ - Robert McKinley, Chairman ATTEST Marianne Lemons, Planning Commission Secretary Attachment 4-Planning Comnussion Findings and Recommendation CPA-2022-04 Page 3of3 Meeting Minutes Spokane Valley Planning Commission Council Chambers—City Hall February 24, 2022 I. Planning Commission Chairman Bob McKinley called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. The meeting was held remotely via ZOOM meeting. II. Administrative Assistant Taylor Dillard took attendance, and the following members and staff were present: Fred Beaulac Cary Driskell, City Attorney Susan Delucchi Chaz Bates, Planning Manager Karl Granrath Taylor Dillard, Administrative Assistant Walt Haneke, absent Marianne Lemons, Administrative Assistant Bob McKinley Nancy Miller Sherri Robinson III. AGENDA: Commissioner Robinson moved to approve the February 24,2022 agenda as presented. There was no discussion. The vote on the motion was six in favor, zero against and the motion passed. IV. MINUTES: Commissioner Delucchi moved to approve the February 10,2022 minutes as presented. There was no discussion. The vote on the motion was six in favor, zero against and the motion passed. V. COMMISSION REPORTS: There were no Commission reports. VI. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT: Planning Manager Chaz Bates explained that he will be the administrator of the Planning Commission meetings in the future. VII. PUBLIC COMMENT: There was no public comment. VIII. COMMISSION BUSINESS: a. 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Planning Manager Chaz Bates gave background and introduced the 2022 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment Process. Mr. Bates explained that amendment applications were accepted through October 31, 2021 and the City Council approved four amendments to be considered during 2022. The Public Hearing for the amendments will be held on March 10,2022 and notice of the hearing was published twice in the newspaper, was posted on the property site, and was mailed to property owners within 400 feet of the proposed amendment location. 02-24- 022 Planning Commission Minutes Page 2 of 4 CPA-2022-0001: A request to change the comprehensive plan designation and zoning for 1.03 acres from Single-Family Residential (SFR) to Multifamily Residential (MFR). Planning Manager Chaz Bates introduced Comprehensive Plan Amendment CPA-2022- 0001. The property consists of two vacant parcels total 1.03 acres and is located on Raymond Road between 10th and 11 th Avenue. The applicant is Land Use Solutions and the owner of the property is Sunshine Health Facilities (SHFI Properties, LLC). The proposal is to change the Land Use Designation from Single-Family Residential (SFR) to Multifamily Residential (MFR). Mr. Bates reviewed the approval criteria: • Expands the MFR land use area by 1.03 acres • No critical areas within the proposed area • Supports redevelopment of vacant properties • Supported by transportation network • Compatible with adjacent uses • There is an increasing need for senior and assisted living facilities CPA-2022-0002: A request to change land use designation and zoning for .45 acres from Single-Family Residential (SFR) to Parks, Recreation and Open Space (P/OS). Planning Manager Chaz Bates introduced Comprehensive Plan Amendment CPA-2022- 0002. The property consists of a single parcel totaling .45 acres in size and is located on the northeast corner of N. Flora Road and E. Montgomery Avenue. The property is adjacent to the Flora Road Centennial Trailhead. The applicant and the owner of the property is the City of Spokane Valley. The proposal is to change the Land Use Designation from Single-Family Residential (SFR) to Parks, Recreation, and Open Space (P/OS). Mr. Bates reviewed the approval criteria: • Expands the P/OS land use area by .45 acres • No critical areas within the proposed area • The area is identified in the Parks and Recreation Master Plan • The change supports the Centennial Trail access and potential river loop trail. • The change is compatible with surrounding uses CPA-2022-0003: A request to change land use designation and zoning for 17.64 acres from Single-Family Residential (SFR) to Parks, Recreation and Open Space (P/OS). Planning Manager Chaz Bates introduced Comprehensive Plan Amendment CPA-2022- 0003. The property consists of six parcels totaling 17.64 acres. The property is located on the southeast corner of E. 44th Avenue and S. Bates Road and extends to the Union Pacific Railroad. The application and the owner of the property is the City of Spokane Valley. The proposal is to change the Land Use Designation from Single-Family Residential (SFR) to Parks, Recreation and Open Space (P/OS). 02-24-2022 Planning Commission Minutes Page 3 of 4 Mr. Bates reviewed the approval criteria: • Expands the P/OS land use area by 17.64 acres • Supports Park Level Of Service • The property was newly acquired for park space • The property provides park space to the neighborhood CPA-2022-0004: A request to amend Figure 27—Bikeway Network to add north river loop trail. Planning Manager Chaz Bates introduced Comprehensive Plan Amendment CPA-2022- 0004. The proposed amendment is a non-site specific map amendment adding a proposed shared use path to Figure-27— Map of Existing and Bicycle Facilities of the Comprehensive Plan. The 2019 Parks and Recreation Master Plan identified a potential trail along the north bank of the Spokane River from Plante's Ferry Park to a potential new park between Flora and Barker Rds. In 2021, the City acquired 46 acres in the proposed amendment area. The amendment will adopt a shared use path and will provide a four linear mile trail along the north bank of the Spokane River from Flora Rd to Plante's Ferry. Mr. Bates reviewed the approval criteria: • The area was identified in the 2019 Parks and Recreation Master Plan • Enhances and supports future park developments • Maintains consistency among plans • Supports grants and other funding opportunities Mr. Bates stated that the Public Hearing for the 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendments will be held on March 10, 2022. IX. GOOD OF THE ORDER: There was consensus from the Planning Commission to mark Commissioner Haneke as "unexcused" due to not informing anyone that he would be absent from the meeting. Commissioner Robinson stated that she might have to miss the next meeting due to traveling. X. ADJOURNMENT: Commissioner Miller moved to adjourn the meeting at 6:40 p.m. The vote on the motion was six in favor, zero against, and the motion passed. 3(76 Bob McKinley, Chair Date Signed 02-24-2022 Planning Commission Minutes Page 4 of 4 Marianne Lemons, Secretary Meeting Minutes Spokane Valley Planning Commission Council Chambers—City Hall March 10,2022 I. Planning Commission Chairman Bob McKinley called the meeting to order at 6:01 p.m. The meeting was held remotely via ZOOM meeting. IL Planning Commission Secretary Lemons took attendance, and the following members and staff were present: Fred Beaulac Cary Driskell, City Attorney Susan Delucchi Chaz Bates, Planning Manager Karl Granrath Taylor Dillard, Administrative Assistant Walt Haneke Marianne Lemons, Administrative Assistant Bob McKinley Nancy Miller Sherri Robinson III. AGENDA: Commissioner Robinson moved to approve the March 10, 2022 agenda as presented. There was no discussion. The vote on the motion was five in favor, zero against and the motion passed. IV. MINUTES: Commissioner Beaulac moved to approve the February 24,2022 minutes as presented. There was no discussion. The vote on the motion was five in favor, zero against and the motion passed. Commissioner Haneke joined the meeting at 6:04 p.m. V. COMMISSION REPORTS: There were no Commission reports. VI. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT: Planning Manager Chaz Bates stated that City staff is discussing the possibility of holding in-person Planning Commission meetings now that the mask mandates have been rescinded and will give an update when a decision has been made. He also stated that a Code Text Amendment will be coming to the Planning Commission for review and recommendation regarding HB 1220 that became effective in 2021 regarding Homeless and Housing. Commissioner Delucchi joined the meeting at 6:06 p.m. VII. PUBLIC COMMENT: There was no public comment. VIII. COMMISSION BUSINESS: 03-10-2022 Planning Commission Minutes Page 2 of 6 a. Public Hearing: 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendment The public hearing was opened at 6:12 p.m. Planning Manager Chaz Bates gave background and introduced the 2022 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment Process. Mr. Bates explained that amendment applications were accepted through October 31, 2021 and the City Council approved four amendments to be considered during 2022. He stated that the notice of the hearing was published twice in the newspaper, was posted on the property site, and was mailed to property owners within 400 feet of the proposed amendment location. CPA-2022-0001: A request to change the comprehensive plan designation and zoning for 1.03 acres from Single-Family Residential (SFR) to Multifamily Residential (MFR). Planning Manager Chaz Bates introduced Comprehensive Plan Amendment CPA-2022- 0001. The property consists of two vacant parcels total 1.03 acres and is located on Raymond Road between 10th and 11 th Avenue. The applicant is Land Use Solutions and the owner of the property is Sunshine Health Facilities (SHFI Properties, LLC). The proposal is to change the Land Use Designation from Single-Family Residential (SFR) to Multifamily Residential (MFR). Mr. Bates reviewed the approval criteria: • Expands the MFR land use area by 1.03 acres • No critical areas within the proposed area • Supports redevelopment of vacant properties • Supported by transportation network • Compatible with adjacent uses • There is an increasing need for senior and assisted living facilities CPA-2022-0002: A request to change land use designation and zoning for.45 acres from Single-Family Residential (SFR) to Parks, Recreation and Open Space (P/OS). Planning Manager Chaz Bates introduced Comprehensive Plan Amendment CPA-2022- 0002. The property consists of a single parcel totaling .45 acres in size and is located on the northeast corner of N. Flora Road and E. Montgomery Avenue. The property is adjacent to the Flora Road Centennial Trailhead. The applicant and the owner of the property is the City of Spokane Valley. The proposal is to change the Land Use Designation from Single-Family Residential (SFR) to Parks, Recreation, and Open Space (P/OS). Mr. Bates reviewed the approval criteria: • Expands the P/OS land use area by .45 acres • No critical areas within the proposed area • The area is identified in the Parks and Recreation Master Plan • The change supports the Centennial Trail access and potential river loop trail. • The change is compatible with surrounding uses 03-10-2022 Planning Commission Minutes Page 3 of 6 CPA-2022-0003: A request to change land use designation and zoning for 17,64 acres from Single-Family Residential (SFR) to Parks, Recreation and Open Space (P/OS). Planning Manager Chaz Bates introduced Comprehensive Plan Amendment CPA-2022- 0003. The property consists of six parcels totaling 17.64 acres. The property is located on the southeast corner of E. 44th Avenue and S. Bates Road and extends to the Union Pacific Railroad. The application and the owner of the property is the City of Spokane Valley. The proposal is to change the Land Use Designation from Single-Family Residential (SFR) to Parks, Recreation and Open Space (P/OS). Mr. Bates reviewed the approval criteria: • Expands the P/OS land use area by 17.64 acres • Supports Park Level Of Service • The property was newly acquired for park space • The property provides park space to the neighborhood CPA-2022-0004: A request to amend Figure 27—Bikeway Network to add north river loop trail. Planning Manager Chaz Bates introduced Comprehensive Plan Amendment CPA-2022- 0004. The proposed amendment is a non-site specific map amendment adding a proposed shared use path to Figure-27—Map of Existing and Bicycle Facilities of the Comprehensive Plan. The 2019 Parks and Recreation Master Plan identified a potential trail along the north bank of the Spokane River from Plante's Ferry Park to a potential new park between Flora and Barker Rds. In 2021, the City acquired 46 acres in the proposed amendment area. The amendment will adopt a shared use path and will provide a four linear mile trail along the north bank of the Spokane River from Flora Rd to Plante's Ferry. Mr. Bates reviewed the approval criteria: • The area was identified in the 2019 Parks and Recreation Master Plan • Enhances and supports future park developments • Maintains consistency among plans • Supports grants and other funding opportunities The matter was opened for public comment. Dwight Hume, the applicant representing Sunshine Health regarding CPA-2022-0001 stated that he reviewed the staff report and agreed with everything included in the report. He said that he feels their proposal is consistent with the criteria for approval within the Comprehensive Plan. He stated that he feels Spokane Valley has a need for assisted living facilities and Sunshine Health hopes to get the multi-family designation so that they can help fill that need. He also said that the surrounding neighborhood is in favor of request. Nathan Dikes, CEO for Sunshine Health Facilities stated that Sunshine has been in Spokane Valley since 1965. He concurred with Mr. Hume's testimony and the staff presentation. He said that Sunshine Health wants to be a good neighbor to the surrounding area and thinks that 03-10-2022 Planning Commission Minutes Page 4 of 6 the proposed development will be a good addition once the land use change has been made to the property. Planning Commissioner Miller asked what services are already available in the current location. Mr. Dikes answered that they provide a skilled nursing facility, assisted living, behavioral health unit, a memory care unit, a certified home health unit, and four adult family homes. Planning Commissioner Secretary read comments received from three members of the public: Wendy Johnson, President of the Chester Community Cemetery expressed support for CPA-2022-0003 stating that the change to Parks and Open Space would be an improvement to the area and would be appreciated by the residents that live nearby. Jene Ray, Spokane Valley, stated that she would like for the area referenced in CPA- 2022-0003 to remain a dog walkers park with the addition of disc golf. Don Danner, Spokane Valley, expressed opposition to CPA-2022-0001 stating that the area around Sunshine Health is already overburdened by firetrucks, ambulances, and police cars blocking the road. He does not feel that the area is designed to support such a large facility and should remain zoned single-family residential. The Planning Commissioners allowed Ms. Jene Ray to speak publicly regarding her written comments. Jene Ray, Spokane Valley, reiterated that she enjoys having the park in her backyard and requested that the City add disc golf to the park once it is developed. She also gave options for getting funding for the disc golf. City Attorney Cary Driskell explained that the current request is just for the land use designation of the property, but the Parks Department will do a public master plan for the development of the park if the land use designation is granted. The public hearing was closed at 6:52 p.m. The Commissioners decided to discuss each Comprehensive Plan Amendment individually. CPA-2022-0001: Commissioner Miller stated that there are 24 assisted living communities and 18 assisted living adult family homes within the City of Spokane Valley. She expressed that she doesn't want to see the R-3 zone be absorbed by multi-family zoning. She said that she feels that the street is very narrow and parking is an issue in that area. Commissioner Haneke stated that he agrees that the street is too narrow. He would like to recommend that parking being banned on the east side of the street. Commissioner Robinson said that Spokane is a medical hub for the surrounding area and a big portion of the people moving to the area are retirees which means there is a large population of people who need the services that assisted living can provide. She also mentioned that people moving into assisted living don't usually drive so she doesn't feel that the parking from the facility residents is going to have a significant impact on the street. Commissioner Delucchi asked how many units would be allowed under the current zoning. Mr. Bates answered that eight units would be allowed under the current zoning and 22 units would be allowed if multi-family zoning is granted. 03-10-2022 Planning Commission Minutes Page 5 of 6 Commissioner Granrath said that while he is not usually in favor of changed residential to multi-family, he feels that Sunshine Health should be allowed to develop their property and that there is a need for additional assisted living facilities. Chairman McKinley stated that he also sees a need for assisted living facilities and Sunshine Health has been a good neighbor in Spokane Valley. However, there is a risk that the property could be sold after the zone change and something totally different could be built on the property instead. The Planning Commission came to a consensus that five members were in favor of recommending approval of the amendment and two opposed. Commissioner Haneke asked if language could be added regarding restricting on-street parking. Mr. Bates stated that he could add that recommendation to the Findings of Fact presented to the City Council. With the recommendation language added, Commissioner Haneke agreed to recommend approval which made the consensus six in favor and one opposed. CPA-2022-0002 Commissioner Haneke expressed concern that there is no parking available in the area for the proposed trailhead. City Attorney Driskell responded that the proposed use of the property is to provide connectivity from the north bank to the Flora park land. He explained that it is not intended to be a parking area. The Planning Commission came to consensus that all members were in favor of recommending approval of the land use change. A ten-minute break was called at 7:25 p.m. The meeting was called back to order at 7:35 p.m. CPA-2022-0003 Commissioner Beaulac asked how much park land would be allocated to the fire department for a new fire station. He expressed concern about building a new fire station across the street from the old fire station. He doesn't feel this is a good use of taxpayer money. City Attorney Driskell responded that the interlocal agreement reads that Spokane Fire District #8 would purchase an estimated three acres of the acquired land. They hope to replace the outdated station with a more modern station that would also have some minor components that would allow for on-site training. Commissioner Haneke asked why it would be zoned parks and open space when it's going to be purchased by the Fire Department. Mr. Bates responded that community services, such as a fire station, is an allowed use within the Parks and Open Space zoning district. The Planning Commission came to consensus that six members were in favor of recommending approval of the land use change and one opposed. CPA-2022-0004 There was no discussion. The Planning Commission came to consensus that all members were in favor of recommending approval of the amendment. Commissioner Haneke moved to recommend approval of CPA-2022-0001 with added parking language, CPA-2022-0002 as submitted, CPA-2022-0003 with added comments regarding the fire station and CPA-2022-0004 as submitted. There was no discussion. The vote on the motion was seven in favor, zero against and the motion passed. 03-10-2022 Planning Commission Minutes Page 6 of 6 IX. GOOD OF THE ORDER: There was nothing offered for the Good Of The Order. X. ADJOURNMENT: Commissioner McKinley moved to adjourn the meeting at 8:04 p.m. The vote on the motion was seven in favor, zero against, and the motion passed. Bob McKinley, Chair Date Signed Marianne Lemons, Secretary Meeting Minutes Spokane Valley Planning Commission Council Chambers—City Hall March 24,2022 I. Planning Commission Chairman Bob McKinley called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. The meeting was held remotely via ZOOM meeting. II. Planning Commission Secretary Lemons took attendance, and the following members and staff were present: Fred Beaulac Cary Driskell, City Attorney Susan Delucchi Chaz Bates, Planning Manager Karl Granrath Marianne Lemons, Administrative Assistant Walt Haneke Bob McKinley Nancy Miller, absent Sherri Robinson There was consensus from the Planning Commission to excuse Commissioner Miller from the meeting. III. AGENDA: Commissioner Robinson moved to approve the March 24, 2022 agenda as presented. There was no discussion. The vote on the motion was five in favor, zero against and the motion passed. IV. MINUTES: Commissioner Beaulac moved to approve the AMENDED March 10, 2022 minutes as submitted. There was no discussion. The vote on the motion was five in favor, zero against and the motion passed. V. COMMISSION REPORTS: There were no Commission reports. Commissioner Granrath joined the meeting at 6:04 p.m. VI. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT: Planning Manager Chaz Bates stated that meetings will return to in-person at the next Planning Commission meeting to be held on April 14, 2022. VII. PUBLIC COMMENT: There was no public comment. VIII. COMMISSION BUSINESS: a. Findings Of Fact: 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Planning Manager Chaz Bates presented the Findings of Fact for the 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendments for approval. He stated that the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendments on at the March 10, 2022 03-24-2022 Planning Commission Minutes Page 2 of 2 meeting. After receiving public testimony, the Planning Commission moved and voted 7-0 to recommend approval to the City Council of CPA-2022-0001 with added parking language, CPA-2022-0002 as submitted, CPA-2022-0003 with added comments regarding the fire station and CPA-2022-0004 as submitted. He explained that the approval of the Findings of Fact will formalize the recommendations that were made at the public hearing. Commissioner Robinson moved to approve the Findings of Fact for the approval of CPA- 2022-0001, CPA-2022-0002, CPA-2022-0003, CPA-2022-0004 as submitted. There was no discussion. The vote on the motion was six in favor, zero against and the motion passed. IX. GOOD OF THE ORDER: Commissioner Beaulac asked if it would be possible to change the newspaper of record from the Spokane Valley Herald to the Spokesman Review. Attorney Driskell explained that the City Council adopted the Herald as the newspaper of record and has not opted to change it. X. ADJOURNMENT: Commissioner Granrath moved to adjourn the meeting at 6:13 p.m. The vote on the motion was seven in favor, zero against, and the motion passed. Bob McKinley, Chair Date Signed Marianne Lemons, Secretary CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Planning Commission Action Meeting Date: February 24, 2022 Item: Check all that apply n old business n new business n public hearing n information Fl study session n pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: 2022 Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendments—Study session GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 36.70A, SVMC 17.80.140 and 19.30.010. PREVIOUS COMMISSION ACTION:None BACKGROUND: The GMA allows local jurisdictions to consider amendments to their Comprehensive Plans once each year.The City codified this process in Section 17.80.140 of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC). Consistent with state law and the SVMC,staff published notice on August 20 and 27,2021, advising the public of the annual amendment process and that the City would accept applications for the 2022 cycle through November 1,2021.The notice was also sent to all agencies,organizations,and adjacent jurisdictions that may have an interest in amending the comprehensive plan. On November 23, 2021,the City Council approved the 2022 Docket. The Docket includes four proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan: three site specific map amendments and an amendment to Figure 27 adding a proposed shared use path. On January 14, 2022, the City issued Determinations of Non-significance (DNS) for the proposed comprehensive plan amendments pursuant to Title 21, Environmental Controls of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code. Comments on the determination have been incorporated into the staff reports where appropriate and no appeal of the DNS was received. A public hearing on the proposed amendments is scheduled for March 10, 2022. The Notice of Public Hearing was published on February 11 and 18, 2022. The site-specific map amendments were posted on site and a notice was mailed to residents within a 400-foot radius on February 18,2022. Tonight, staff will present the proposed comprehensive plan amendments for review and discussion. On March 10, 2022,the Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on the proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION:No action recommended at this time. STAFF CONTACT: Chaz Bates,AICP,Planning Manager ATTACHMENTS: 1. Presentation 2. Yellow Binder RPCA Study Session for 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Page 1 of 1 2022 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendments February 24, 2024 Chaz Bates, Planning Manger Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment Process Initiated by• . COMMUNITY AND PUBLIC WORKS Spokane DEPARTMENT Property owners/representatives Citizens, agencies, neighborhood NOTICE OF CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY'S ANNUAL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CYCLE CityThe City of Spokane Valley is providing notice that the application window for the 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendment cycle will close on November 1,2021. to Application deadline November 1 Completed nsideeddcaingte2must 2am received by5:00 .A.on November a after be considered during the 2022 amendment cycle.Applications received after November 1,2021,will be registered for consideration for the next amendment cycle in 2023.All proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan require a Notice published 60—days prior pre-application conference prior to submitting an application. The City of Spokane Valley's Comprehensive Plan is the primary policy document , organizations, that governs how the City will accommodate and respond to the growth of the Notice sent to agencies community over time. The annual amendment cycle provides the opportunity to propose changes to the and adjacent jurisdictions Comprehensive Plan to address changing land use conditions or emerging issues. Proposed amendments will be subject to review and a public hearing by the Spokane Valley Planning Commission before recommendations are made to the Pre-a pp required City Council. For more information about the comprehensive plan or application materials please visit www.spokanevalley.orpz/cp or contact Chaz Bates,Senior Planner at Complete application(s) are docketed (509)720-5337 or cbates@spokanevalley.org. 2/24/2022 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Study Session 2 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Roles ___ ___,,, Staff — = Planning City Council • Facilitates Process Commission • Reviews PC • Conducts review • Conducts Public 1 Findings and and analysis Hearing1 Deliberations p • Prepares staff • Deliberates and • Considers public 77 .0 reports and public recommendation comment notices to Council • May approve, modify, or deny requests 2/24/2022 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Study Session 3 2022 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment Timeline Today N 0 O O • a) � Study Session Administrative Report N v 'E C 2-24-2022 4- 19-2022 0_ = O }' c Q = O Public Hearing — 1st Reading co 0 Q a 3- 10-2022 0 5-3-2022 Q co — 0 O c Q •V '0 Q V 'c Findings of Fact 0O 2nd Reading N +_� cc 3-24-2022 > 5-24-2022 Q 0 W 0 a Q c.) cn z o L5 Ni‘a&I 1( a 2/24/2022 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Study Session Notice of Public Hearing 7 Published in paper axwell Ave 2-11-2022 & 2-18-2022 Posted on property A1Mdm Fn: - 2-22-2022 = Mailed to property owners -- 2-18-2022 E-Shar. we III /Yr/ ",, 're-ire/A /j :E,Bgone Ave —, z /14,, ,-'opAirr" Legend - ca Project Site ' :.//,I 400 foot buffer \_ IIIIE Desmet Ave l " E Desmet Ave j I I '' / I I I _ 2/24/2022 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Study Session Planning Commission Materials Yellow Binder Staff Report Application materials Maps S E PA Checklist City of Spokane Valley Annual Comprehensive Plan Notices Amendment s Agency comments =x , - Public comments �Ualley Supplemental documents poka10210 ealleyA9920 Spokane Sprague g A venue www.SpakaneValley.org • r ` 2/24/2022 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Study Session 6 Approval Criteria - SVMC 17. 80 . 140 Required Findings Additional Factors Supports public health, safety, and Effect on environment protection of the environment Effect on open space, streams, rivers, Consistent with GMA and Comp Plan and lakes Responds to change in conditions Compatibility and impact on existing Corrects an error uses and neighborhoods Addresses deficiency Adequacy and impact on services Benefit to City and Region Quantity, location and demand for land Projected population for area Other effects on Comp Plan 2/24/2022 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Study Session 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Docket File Number Location Type / Who Description CPA-2022-01 10506 E 10th Map / Private Change 1.03 acres from SFR to MFR CPA-2022-02 17105 E Montgomery Map / City Change .45 acres from SFR to P/OS CPA-2022-03 44th and Bates Map / City Change 17.64 acres from SFR to P/OS Bike and Pedestrian CPA-2022-04 Map Figure 27 Map / City Add proposed north river loop trail to Figure 27. 2/24/2022 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Study Session Privately Initiated Map Amendment - CPA-2022-01 -, 1 1 1 1 1 11 tir Applicant: Land Use E9thAve E9tAv Solutions III h 1 Application Area Owner: Sunshine Health EYOthA EIOthAve Facilities N Amendment: Change from i Y a a ti a flit-0 Single Family Residential _ c, E11thAve (SFR) to Multiple Family E12th Avg Residential (MFR) 1 Legend Ctdu MFR PDS E13th Ave M 1 Mu -RC • _IMu _NC SFR v y 2/24/2022 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Study Session 9 CPA-2022-01 - Application Analysis ___ ., . ,. ...,,,,,,„,: ,,;,. ,. -, Expands the MFR by 1.03 ac y , , F,,,,,z..--,, ra.r, , ,, _,.,_ •-: No critical areas : 4,. ,���P 4 r _ ` � = "��' �`Supports redevelopment of vacant properties Supported by transportation network Compatible with adjacent t a•. uses * a� il . _. Increasing need for seniors _ and assisted living facilities 2/24/2022 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Study Session City Initiated Map Amendment - CPA-2020-0002 „,. _, --- Applicant: Spokane Valley ,,,, Owner: Spokane Valley - Application Area Amendment: Change from Single :._t r _� 'er i,aETr,LL oWtcPV1 pv Family Residential (SFR) to Parks, - - - to Recreation and Open Space r (P/OS) III E .n. .ie1+ A v 11111111ffIIINI III - z • Legend ` , II �ibi L77 II. -CM LJ-M FR-PDS ■ F ., MU -RC =IMU =NC SFREIndiana Ave I I .. II v 0 50 100 `eet 00 MO 400 F 2/24/2022 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Study Session 11 CPA-2022-02 - Application Analysis Expands the P/OS by .45 ac No critical areas n Area identified in Park and a ` Recreation Master Plan Supports Centennial Trail access and potential river 1 loop trail �r Y Compatible with r surrounding uses 2/24/2022 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Study Session 12 CPA-2020-03 - City Initiated Map Amendment ___ E 44th Ave Applicant: Spokane Valley 111 Owner: Spokane Valley Em6rRg Amendment: Change from Single - Rd Family Residential (SFR) to Parks, 4 h Recreation and Open Space (P/OS) 1 I _E J 4 47tlt D) r E47IhAve 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 N - Application Area Legend - P �� 4 7 -CMu-MFR-PDS 4P I M U -RC Q, _IMU -NC SFR A9 N A — — Feet ` s 2/24/2022 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Study Session 13 CPA-2023-03 - Application Analysis rot Expands the P/OS by17.64 ac •��'.. - . , ' '� �� .� Supports Park Level of Service �' fi y Newly acquired property for & a . • parks Provides park space to the neighborhood = _ " w • 2/24/2022 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Study Session CPA-2020-04 - City Initiated Map Amendment ___ �� Spokane Valley River Loop Trail ■ • Spoken FUNDING REQUEST$16.5 million ■ p p ea n t. Spokane Valley The Spokane Valley River Loop Trail,a paved non-motorized trail along the Spokane River's north bank that would connect Plante's Ferry Sports Complex to two city regional parks.The proposed trail is approximately Live miles long and a Sp Va I I ey olraaeV �nrE el recommended project in the city's 2019 Parks and Recreation Master Plan.The trail would connect to the Centennial Trail with 509.720 3000 two pedestrian bridges and improve access to the Spokane River. - r - SPOKANE VALLEY - .- ■ _ RIVER LOOP TRAIL '" Owner: Spokane Planbn - - - - - - � Ferry -: • Afive mile Iron-motorized)paved •q-• b r „ gperte scenic trai that would Serve dcy- - t I•�: ' .. t � `.'.:' +`".. cwcree c iels,runners and walkers,and - � 'f' Valley sideallow faccess to the nver'swh north -mce soil. A . forishermen and whderratei "" .`. . 3' _. enthc s:.. pm 4- - FLORA ROAD Amendment: Amend �� , g PARK PROPERTY • g i �� ' 1 „rI... A 46acre property envisioned to ;M r Y ff t!li include nature trails and other park Z,z1 . facilities along the river's northern t y so mi ice' bank.A pedestrian bridge spanning ' sl. I. "•mFy •d'•f _ mg • the river would connect the River k �E. • a r ' gm Loop Trail and park to Flora Road Figure 27 - Existing -r: 1 1.1' •ori imi__,_ �dthe��t ni�Tr.l and Recommended s "ry !'^ ` " ' ' 2 ' Y_ � I � I 11 r t : a e r PEDESTRIAN BRIDGES F_, �. _ 11 I -.,. Y II a w. Flora Real Bicycle Facilities i`® ` . � ' , �' "y --Z "'mac .• -. ar - r • ''� am. yarn a t r ` • PINES ROAD ACCESS �_ `` A new access and parking area Y a >= '�=-g be — • • i `�' i t - - for users of both the Centennial • ,.-_-7„_ I w !'TM Ii - and Spokane Valley River Loop . :. _ y $ flails.A pedestrian e cold .�,,11 Line e Added " fling the Spokane River would T*� 4 conned the two trails. 0O'0t �� ' ' ' '' Ste - r�) 2/24/2022 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Study Session 15 CPA-2022-04 - Application Analysis _ Figure 27 Map of Exisiting and Recommended Bicyle Facilities Identified in 2019 Park i ,::1 z:-- ii ,,, „, ,,..- Proposed Amendment valley sprne.,, •1.Iiiii Proposed Shared Use Path ,t1 Existing&Proposed and Recreation Master z , 0 2 Bikeway Network ., #.`..., 2 , t a Munlopal Boundaries Plan F =Spokane kallts ph bk tterra Lk Pr,U.; .,.. I E 1.100.e,AV — ....'Ex15fing Tko dant Enhances and supports :'.1 E Ressle Ave ...e .1 1 7 . 1 EmanA. ,. —B ke Priard y ROIJEE r .r Pket. 'odrake B dae s' 2 . . I ., -. i -E. ,....,., r, P '.....,,E, •••,,,p0,,Peri R.=rarkte .. ,, . future park developments ! , ,-- i , inimmim•E i_.,, _,,.......•.. E . ............ z P. E w , .....Proposed.narcd Ls=Pat D 0 5 1 1 5 /el ''e'e Maintains consistency ti,,„, among plans ,,..„ lim . .. , 1 7# Supports grants and other funding ,. 1., opportunities , 2 2/24/2022 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Study Session 16 Discussion Sp""o"kane Valley. 2/24,w� 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Study Session 17 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Planning Commission Action Meeting Date: March 10, 2022 Item: Check all that apply n old business n new business Fl public hearing n information n study session n pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: 2022 Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendments—Public Hearing. GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 36.70A, SVMC 17.80.140 and 19.30.010. PREVIOUS COMMISSION ACTION: On February 24,2022,the Planning Commission held a Study Session on the 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendments. BACKGROUND: The GMA allows local jurisdictions to consider amendments to their Comprehensive Plans once each year. The City codified this process in SVMC 17.80.140. Consistent with state law and City Code,staff published notice on August 20 and 27,2021,advising the public of the annual amendment process and that the City would accept applications for the 2022 cycle through November 1, 2021. The notice was also sent to all agencies, organizations, and adjacent jurisdictions that may have an interest in amending the Comprehensive Plan. On November 23, 2021,the City Council approved the 2022 Docket. The Docket includes four proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan: three site specific map amendments and an amendment to Figure 27 adding a proposed shared use path. On January 14, 2022, the City issued Determinations of Non-significance (DNS) for the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendments pursuant to Title 21, Environmental Controls of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code. Comments on the determination have been incorporated into the staff reports where appropriate and no appeal of the DNS was received. On February 11 and 18,2022,a Notice of Public Hearing for the proposed amendments was published. On February 17,2022,the site-specific map amendments were posted on the sites and a notice of public hearing was mailed to property owners within 400 feet of the proposed amendment sites. On February 24,2022,staff presented the proposed 2022 Comprehensive Plan amendments to the Planning Commission for their review and discussion. Tonight's meeting will include a public hearing on the proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Discuss the proposed amendments and provide staff direction to prepare the findings. The Planning Commission may recommend approval, approval with modifications,or denial of the proposed amendments. STAFF CONTACT: Chaz Bates,AICP, Planning Manager ATTACHMENTS: 1. Presentation 2. Please bring Yellow Binder RPCA Public Hearing for 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Page 1 of 1 2022 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendments March 10, 2022 Chaz Bates, Planning Manger Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment Process Initiated by• . COMMUNITY AND PUBLIC WORKS Spokane DEPARTMENT Property owners/representatives Citizens, agencies, neighborhood NOTICE OF CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY'S ANNUAL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CYCLE CityThe City of Spokane Valley is providing notice that the application window for the 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendment cycle will close on November 1,2021. to Application deadline November 1 Completed nsideeddcaingte2must 2am received by5:00 .A.on November a after be considered during the 2022 amendment cycle.Applications received after November 1,2021,will be registered for consideration for the next amendment cycle in 2023.All proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan require a Notice published 60—days prior pre-application conference prior to submitting an application. The City of Spokane Valley's Comprehensive Plan is the primary policy document , organizations, that governs how the City will accommodate and respond to the growth of the Notice sent to agencies community over time. The annual amendment cycle provides the opportunity to propose changes to the and adjacent jurisdictions Comprehensive Plan to address changing land use conditions or emerging issues. Proposed amendments will be subject to review and a public hearing by the Spokane Valley Planning Commission before recommendations are made to the Pre-a pp required City Council. For more information about the comprehensive plan or application materials please visit www.spokanevalley.orpz/cp or contact Chaz Bates,Senior Planner at Complete application(s) are docketed (509)720-5337 or cbates@spokanevalley.org. 3/10/2022 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Public Hearing 2 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Roles ___ ___,,, Staff — = Planning City Council • Facilitates Process Commission • Reviews PC • Conducts review • Conducts Public Findings and and analysis Hearing 1 Deliberations • Prepares staff _ • Deliberates and • Considers public p f reports and public - recommendation comment notices to Council • May approve, modify, or deny requests 3/10/2022 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Public Hearing 3 2022 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment Timeline Today a.., 75 •i a) 0 O O • a) u) Study Session Administrative Report a) v 2-24-2022 4- 19-2022 c In (/) 0- E = 0 ublic Hearin _ 1st Reading CD Cv O CL Q 3- 10-202� 5-3-2022 a .4.7, Q V 0 c '� Q V 'c Findings of Fact (Oj 2nd Reading N +_� CD 3-24-2022 5-24-2022 Q O W O a Q 0 cn z E 0 3/10/2022 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Public Hearing Notice of Public Hearing 7 Published in paper axwelI Ave 2-11-2022 & 2-18-2022 Posted on property m Fn: - 2-22-2022 "1. = Mailed to property owners _ 2-18-2022 E-Shar. IIIis ':li ' r1 relairerA /j :E,lire Ave z 74,,, ,-'/OW Legend - Project Site ' :.//,I 400 foot buffer I I I IE Desmet Ave l E Desmet Ave I( I I I I I I I I I '' / I I I _ 3/10/2022 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Public Hearing Planning Commission Materials Yellow Binder im= �- Staff Report Application materials Maps S E PA Checklist City of Spokane Valley Annual Comprehensive Plan Notices Amendment s Agency comments =x , Public comments sotikai Walley Supplemental documents Puu Sprague Avenue Spokane alley g WA 9920 venue www.SpakaneValley.org r ` 3/10/2022 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Public Hearing 6 Approval Criteria - SVMC 17. 80 . 140 Required Findings Additional Factors Supports public health, safety, and Effect on environment protection of the environment Effect on open space, streams, rivers, Consistent with GMA and Comp Plan and lakes Responds to change in conditions Compatibility and impact on existing Corrects an error uses and neighborhoods Addresses deficiency Adequacy and impact on services Benefit to City and Region Quantity, location and demand for land Projected population for area Other effects on Comp Plan 3/10/2022 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Public Hearing 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Docket File Number Location Type / Who Description CPA-2022-01 10506 E 10th Map / Private Change 1.03 acres from SFR to MFR CPA-2022-02 17105 E Montgomery Map / City Change .45 acres from SFR to P/OS CPA-2022-03 44th and Bates Map / City Change 17.64 acres from SFR to P/OS Bike and Pedestrian CPA-2022-04 Map Figure 27 Map / City Add proposed north river loop trail to Figure 27. 3/10/2022 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Public Hearing Privately Initiated Map Amendment - CPA-2022-01 -, 1 1 1 1 1 11 tir Applicant: Land Use E9thAve E9tAv Solutions il , 1 Application Area Owner: Sunshine Health EYOthA EIOthAve Facilities N Amendment: Change from i a Y a ti a fYRFCr Single Family Residential _ c, E11thAve (SFR) to Multiple Family E12th Avg Residential (MFR) 1 Legend Ctdu MFR PDS E13th Ave M 1 Mu -Rc • _IMu _NC SFR v 3/10/2022 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Public Hearing 9 CPA-2022-01 - Application Analysis ___ , _,., . -\. .4: ...... „,... ., .. F,-,,,,,::„. _,,,_ _ . Expands the MFR by 1.03 ac y, ra.r, i'' � 'i No critical areas : \ . Supports redevelopment of _ ` � = "r�' ` vacant properties Supported by transportation � ....aas ' �..>n..a.,� - 9',da 'network Compatible with adjacent •. uses ,. '. _. Increasing need for seniors _ and assisted living facilities 3/10/2022 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Public Hearing A CPA-2022-01: Staff, Agency, Public Comment Staff and Agency Comment Public Comment No comments received. No comments received 3/10/2022 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Public Hearing 11 City Initiated Map Amendment - CPA-2022-02 Applicant: Spokane Valley � � k�a Owner: Spokane Valley Application Area Amendment: Change from Single :.t _'er 1, ET,LL ,esy" Family Residential (SFR) to Parks, - - ow Recreation and Open Space (P/OS) III E .n.fie1+ A v III II il 11111111ffIIINI - z Legend ` , �ibi L77 A. -CM LJ-M FR-PDS ■ F ., MU -RC =IMU =NC SFREIndiana Ave I MI II v I II.. 0 50 100 MOMO S0i Feet 3/10/2022 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Public Hearing 12 CPA-2022-02 - Application Analysis ,„ .,,,,,. _ T, s___ ,,_ _ _ ,.\ .__ „, . Expands the P/OS by .45 ac „<,......--_, _ __ No critical areasNits n x Area identified in Park and a 4` r . Recreation Master Plan _ ...err Supports Centennial Trail access and potential river ` h ` _= k k loop trail @� �r Y x Compatible with r surrounding uses 3/10/2022 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Public Hearing 13 CPA-2022-02 : Staff, Agency, Public Comment Staff and Agency Comment Public Comment No comments received. No comments received 3/10/2022 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Public Hearing 14 CPA-2022-03 - City Initiated Map Amendment ___ E 44th Ave Applicant: Spokane Valley 111 Owner: Spokane Valley Em6rRg Amendment: Change from Single - Rd Family Residential (SFR) to Parks, 4 h Recreation and Open Space (P/OS) 1 _E J 4 47tlt D) r E47IhAve 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 N - Application Area Legend - P �� 4 -c6Au-MFR-PDS $� I Mu -RC Ap _IMu -NC SFR 0, A 9 N A — — Feet ` s 3/10/2022 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Public Hearing 15 CPA-2022-03 - Application Analysis , __ ,.f '• 'rot Expands the P/OS by17.64 ac �'' '� .� Supports Park Level of Service �' fi• Newly acquired property for & , _ parks Provides park space to the '°� ' � ,{ b' f } B'✓ neighborhood = 8 3/10/2022 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Public Hearing CPA-2022-03: Staff, Agency, Public Comment Staff and Agency Comment Public Comment No comments received. No comments received 3/10/2022 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Public Hearing 17 CPA-2022-04 - City Initiated Map Amendment ___ �., Spokane Valley River Loop Trail ■ • Spokan FUNDING REQUEST$16.5 million p p ea n t.■ Spokane dal l ' The Spokane Valley River Loop Trail,a paved non-motorized trail along the Spokane River's north bank that would connect Plante's Ferry Sports Complex to two city regional parks.The proposed trail is approximately Live miles long and a Sp Va I I ey otraaeVelleg nrE recommended project in the city's 2019 Parks and Recreation Master Plan.The trail would connect to the Centennial Trail with 509 7203000 two pedestrian bridges and improve access to the Spokane River. - r - SPOKANE VALLEY - .- ■ _ RIVER LOOP TRAIL '" Owner: Spokane ,lamb ,I - - - - - - m Ferry 4t'` Afrve mile{non-n otor¢ed)paved -• `b a 8perte scenic hai thatvwuld Serve dcy- — t I•�: ' • I � `.'.:' +`".. cwcree cIws,runners and walkers,and - � 'f' Va I l ey allow access tothe ve€'sno D -mcesv& A - side forishermen and whderratei 3' _. enthc s:.. FM NM 4- - FLORA ROAD Amendment: Amend �� ' a PARK PROPERTY g i �� - 1 „rI... A46acre property envisioned to ;M r Y err MO li include nature trails and other park Z, � • facilities along the river's northern ... D on Mi ice' bank.A pedestrian bridge spanning ' sl. •` "'mFy- ' ., f _ mg • the river would connect the River k �E. • a r Loop Trail and panic to Fora Road Figure 27 - Existing -r: 1As __,_ �dthe C�tnidTeed. � y . .� •R a IMP— ®illy w 4,: t [��� and Recommended - "ry !'^ ` " ' ' PEDESTRIAN BRIDGES F_, IP �. _ 1�• 7 - a w. Flora Read Bicycle Facilities `® ` - � ' Pak Prepay 4`-- `---,RvfR LoovTnut err r ''_ am. yarn a t r ` • PINES ROAD ACCESS �_ - ``- S A new access and perking area Y a > ;arcr be — . or• i `�' I t tor users of both the centennial ,. -7„_ I A �'TM 'T - sold Spokane volley River Loop :. - -- y $ hails.ApedeshieRiverwoold- .�,,11 Line Added _ #4. ning the Spokane River would T*i 9 t conned the two trails. '0t 3/10/2022 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Public Hearing 18 CPA-2022-04 - Application Analysis _ e" Figure 27 Map of Exisiting and Spokane County r w„...,..,y Recommended Bicyle Facilities Identified in 2019 Park i li,,_81 - z ,,,. ,,..- Proposed Amendment valley sprne.,, •1.Iiii.Proposed Shared Use Path and Recreation Master z , 7, 2 Existing&Proposed Bikeway Network #.`..., ' .'4 ,.. , a Municipal Boundaries Plan F =Spokane sal.:WM 1 new th Paw U.; =Parks Roc ellen P Oper Scare ' i E 1.1mo,AV (;;;: 15 Bikeway Elements a'.--- -Existing Tke Lant --- Enhancesand supports 21. reTe gY a 71_....... . Emmons. ri a -i ii BE xkiset oF reWrdd yr e5i0ke5,B We 2 .. Inis . _i__•,,. .--. future park developments -.11.PPrraogpioenre,d Bneikde RLeIMm Bridge minnommi _ ,, P. , EE D 0 5 1 1 5 Hr.aMPIIIIRIPPIMINVIII.11...11 . /el Maintains consistency ti k Wil,..mill E E1E11: 77 . 1 E Ee ti , among plans ,„„ -,-„,, •. . . . . . _ ., .z .09 -2.#4 Supports grants and • nisi...wrap Spakane Caton, .'"Z'a, Poz', ,//':/l other funding ,. ;,,, opportunities 722- . 2,. 3/10/2022 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Public Hearing 19 CPA-2022-04: Staff, Agency, Public Comment Staff and Agency Comment Public Comment No comments received. No comments received 3/10/2022 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Public Hearing 20 Questions? Sp""o"kane Valley 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Public Hearing 21 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Planning Commission Action Meeting Date: March 24, 2021 Item: Check all that apply ❑ old business ® new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ study session ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: 2022 Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendments—Findings of Fact GOVERNING LEGISLATION: Chapter RCW 36.70A, SVMC 17.80.140 and 19.30.010. PREVIOUS COMMISSION ACTION: Study Session on February 24,2022; Public Hearing on March 10,2022. BACKGROUND: On February 24,2022,the Planning Commission held a study session on the proposed 2022 Comprehensive Plan amendments. A public hearing on the proposed amendments was held March 10, 2022. Following the public hearing,the Planning Commission deliberated on each CPA and voted as follows: CPA-2022-01 6-1 to forward to City Council a recommendation to approve CPA-2022-01. CPA-2022-02 7-0 to forward to City Council a recommendation to approve CPA-2022-02. CPA-2022-03 6-1 to forward to City Council a recommendation to approve CPA-2022-03. CPA-2022-04 7-0 to forward to City Council a recommendation to approve CPA-2022-04. City Council may choose to adopt the proposed individual amendments as recommended by the Planning Commission,deny the proposed amendments,or modify and adopt the proposal. If the Council chooses to modify a proposal and the modifications are substantial,they must either conduct a public hearing or refer the proposal back to the Planning Commission for further consideration. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: I move to approve and forward to the City Council the Findings and Recommendation of the Spokane Valley Planning Commission for CPA-2022-01,CPA-2022- 02, CPA-2022-03, and CPA-2022-04. STAFF CONTACT: Chaz Bates,AICP, Planning Manager ATTACHMENTS: General Findings and Recommendation for CPA-2022-01, CPA-2022-02, CPA-2022-03, and CPA-2022- 04; Attachments 1,2, 3, and 4 for the Specific Findings and Recommendation for CPA-2022-01, CPA- 2022-02, CPA-2022-03, and CPA-2022-04 Please bring your Yellow Binder to the meeting. RPCA Findings for 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Page 1 of 1 COMMUNITY& PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT crrs �� BUILDING&PLANNING DIVISION Spokane STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION v CPA-2022-01 STAFF REPORT DATE: February 16, 2022 HEARING DATE AND LOCATION: March 10,2022,beginning at 6:00 p.m.,remotely via Zoom. Project Number: CPA-2022-01 Application Description: A request to change the comprehensive plan designation and zoning for 1.03 acres Single Family Residential (SFR)to Multifamily Residential (MFR). Location: Parcels 45204.1436 and 45204.1435; SE 1/4 of Section 20,Township 25 North,Range 44 East,Willamette Meridian, Spokane County,Washington Applicant: Dwight Hume,Land Use Solutions and Entitlement Owners: SHFI Properties,LLC Date of Application: October 26,2021 Staff Contact: Chaz Bates,Planning Manager, 10210 E Sprague Avenue, Spokane Valley, WA 99206 APPROVAL CRITERIA: Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan, Title 17 Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) General Provisions, Title 19 SVMC Zoning Regulations, and Title 21 SVMC Environmental Controls. ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit 1: Proposed Comprehensive Plan Map Exhibit 7: Environmental Determination Exhibit 2: Proposed Zoning Map Exhibit 8: SEPA Checklist Exhibit 3: Vicinity Map Exhibit 9: Notice of Public Hearing Exhibit 4: 2020 Aerial Exhibit 10: Agency Comments Exhibit 5: Existing Comprehensive Plan Map Exhibit 11: Public Comments Exhibit 6: Existing Zoning A. BACKGROUND INFORMATION PROPERTY INFORMATION Size and Characteristics: The property consists of two vacant parcels totaling 1.03 acres,located on Raymond Road between 10th and 11th Avenue. Comprehensive Plan: Single Family Residential (SFR) Zoning: Single Family Residential(R-3) Existing Use: Vacant(former apai tinent complex on north parcel and single family building on the south parcel) Page 1 of 6 Staff Report CPA-2022-01 SURROUNDING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN,ZONING,AND LAND USES Comprehensive Plan: SFR North Zoning: R-3 Uses: Single family residences and adult family homes Comprehensive Plan: SFR South Zoning: R-3 Uses: Single-family residence Comprehensive Plan: SFR East Zoning: R-3 Uses: Single-family residences Comprehensive Plan: MFR West Zoning: MFR Uses: Sunshine Health Care facility, assisted living facility APPLICATION PROCESSING: Chapter 17.80 Permit Processing Procedures in the SVMC. The following summarizes key application procedures for the proposal. Application Submitted: October 2,2019 SEPA Determination of Non-Significance Issue date January 14,2022 End of Appeal Period for DNS: January 28,2022 Date of Mailed Notice of Public Hearing February 18,2022 Date of Published Notice of Public Hearing: February 11 and 18,2022 SUMMARY AND IMPLICATIONS OF PROPOSED AMENDMENT: If adopted the amendment will change the comprehensive plan land use designation and zoning to MFR which allows more intensive residential uses,including assisted living facilities. The current zoning of R- 3 does not allow assisted living facilities. B. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO SEPA 1. Findings: Pursuant to Title 21 (Environmental Controls) SVMC, the lead agency has determined that the proposal does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). The City issued a Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) for the proposal on January 14, 2022. The determination was made after review of a completed environmental checklist, the application, Titles 19, 21, and 22 of the SVMC, a site assessment, public and agency comments, the Comprehensive Plan and associated Environmental Impact Statement. 2. Conclusion(s): The procedural requirements of the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) and Title 21 SVMC have been fulfilled. C. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT AND AREA-WIDE REZONE i. The City may approve Comprehensive Plan amendments and area-wide zone map amendments if it finds that compliance with the approval criteria in SVMC 17.80.140(H). Page 2 of 6 Staff Report CPA-2022-01 (1) The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to the public health, safety, welfare,and protection of the environment; Analysis: The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to the public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment. The City continues to see increasing population growth with 2020 Census estimates showing a population of just over 102,000; in 2016 the estimate from the Office of Financial Management was 94,160. More recently, the City adopted a Housing Action Plan that shows that seniors (age 65+) are continuing to increase their share of the City's population. This age group includes those in need of assisted living arrangements. Based on conversations with the applicant Sunshine Health, they are requesting a change to MFR to meet future demand for multifamily development that can accommodate an assisted living facility near their existing facility to the west. The change helps meet existing and future demand; helps protect the environment by building in a developed area; helps Sunshine Health meet a needed public service in a cost-efficient manner. (2) The proposed amendment is consistent with the requirements of Chapter 36.70A RCW and with the portion of the City's adopted plan not affected by the amendment; Analysis: The proposed amendment is consistent with the requirements of Chapter 36.70A RCW and with the portion of the City's adopted Plan not affected by the amendment. The Growth Management Act(GMA) adopts 14 goals to guide the development of local comprehensive plans and development regulations. The request allows opportunity to provide an assisted living facility adjacent to an existing development owned by the same entity. There are no transportation improvements planned adjacent to the site within the planning horizon of 2037. The proposal does not conflict with any other GMA goals. The amendment is not in conflict with any other portions of the Comprehensive Plan. (3) The proposed amendment responds to a substantial change in conditions beyond the property owner's control applicable to the area within which the subject property lies; Analysis: The proposed amendment is not in response to a change in conditions beyond the property owner's control. (4) The proposed amendment corrects an obvious mapping error; or Analysis: The amendment is not in response to a mapping error. (5) The proposed amendment addresses an identified deficiency in the Comprehensive Plan. Analysis: The City has seen continued population growth especially in age segments that often seek multifamily developments (millennials and seniors). Increasing opportunity for multifamily development in areas that are supported by existing infrastructure provides an opportunity to meet adopted goals, policies, and strategies for housing needs. The proposed amendment provides an additional tool and opportunity to meet the City's housing needs. The Comprehensive Plan identifies the following goals and policy that support the proposed change: H-G2 Enable the development of affordable housing for all income levels. CF-P2 Optimize the use of existing public facilities before investing in new facilities. Page 3 of 6 Staff Report CPA-2022-01 ii. The City must also consider the following factors prior to approving Comprehensive Plan amendments: (6) The effect upon the physical environment; Analysis: The change to MFR will allow for expanded uses including multifamily housing and assisted living facilities. The properties will have the opportunity to transition, add density and add different uses including assisted living facilities. There is no concern on effect of physical environment. (7) The effect on open space, streams,rivers, and lakes; Analysis: There are no known critical areas associated with the site, such as wetlands, fish and wildlife habitat areas, frequently flooded areas or geologically hazardous areas. The parcel is not located within shoreline jurisdiction, and there are no known surface water quality or quantity issues. Chapter 21.40 SVMC will ensure adequate protection of critical areas. (8) The compatibility with and impact on adjacent land uses and surrounding neighborhoods; Analysis: The parcels are currently vacant. A multifamily building was located on the northern parcel but was demolished in 2017. The adjacent use west is the existing Sunshine Health facility that provides a variety of health related services including assisted living. West of the existing Sunshine Health facility is Valley Christian School; to the north, east, and south are single-family residences. All the properties except for the existing Sunshine Health facility are designated Single Family Residential and zoned R-3. If the amendment is approved any future development would be subject to the City's transitional provision. (9) The adequacy of and impact on community facilities including utilities, roads, public transportation,parks,recreation, and schools; Analysis: Raymond Avenue and 10th and 11th Roads are Local Access streets. There are no planned transportation projects in the area. The nearest City recreational facility is Appleway Trail approximately'/mile to the north. The closest formal City park is Balfour Park approximately one mile to the north.A project on the site would be considered infill development, as such, the expansion of allowed uses and increased densities are supported by the infrastructure that is in place. (10) The benefit to the neighborhood, City, and region; Analysis: The proposed change would allow the property to increase density and support infill development in an area planned for urban growth. The change will support the identified need for housing. The change benefits the neighborhood, City, and region by supporting the following adopted Comprehensive Plan goals: H-G1 Allow for a broad range of housing opportunities to meet the needs of the community. H-G2 Enable the development of affordable housing for all income levels. (11) The quantity and location of land planned for the proposed land use type and density and the demand for such land; Analysis: The proposal would add approximately one acre of MFR property. The MFR designation in this location would allow for increased options for Page 4 of 6 Staff Report CPA-2022-01 development including an assisted living facility in an area adjacent to an existing facility. The proposal is limited to a reasonable area and impacts to adjacent Single Family Residential zones would be mitigated by the adopted transitional provisions. (12) The current and projected population density in the area; and Analysis: Currently, the site allows for 8 dwelling units per acre. If the proposal is approved it will allow for 22 dwelling units per acre resulting in a net increase of 14 dwelling units. The proposed change would have little impact on overall population density. (13) The effect upon other aspects of the Comprehensive Plan. Analysis: The MFR designation will support the goals and policies identified above. The amendment will have no effect on other elements of the Comprehensive Plan, including Housing, Capital Facilities and Public Services, Public and Private Utilities, Parks and Open Space and Natural Resources. Conclusion(s): For the reasons outlined above the proposed amendment is consistent with SVMC 17.80.140(H). D. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO PUBLIC COMMENTS 1. Findings: Staff has received no public comments to date. Comments received following the date of this staff report will be provided to the Planning Commission at the March 10,2022 meeting. 2. Conclusion(s): Notice of Public Hearing (NOPH)was published on February 11 and 18,2022. The NOPH was posted on site on February 17,2022 and mailed on February 18,2022 to residents within an 400 foot radius. E. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO AGENCY COMMENTS 1. Findings: Staff has not received any agency comments of significance to date. Agency Received Comments Comments Dated City of Spokane Valley Senior Traffic Engineer City of Spokane Valley Development Engineering City of Spokane Valley Building& Planning City of Spokane Valley Parks&Recreation Spokane Valley Fire Department City of Millwood City of Liberty Lake City of Spokane City of Spokane Valley Police Department Spokane County,Building and Planning Spokane County,Environmental Services Spokane County, Clean Air Agency Page 5 of 6 Staff Report CPA-2022-01 Spokane County,Fire District No. 1 Spokane County,Fire District No. 8 Spokane County Regional Health District Spokane Regional Clean Air Agency Spokane Aquifer Joint Board Spokane Transit Authority(STA) Spokane Regional Transportation Council(SRTC) Washington State Dept of Commerce Washington State Dept of Ecology(Olympia) Washington State Dept of Ecology(Spokane) Washington State Dept of Fish& Wildlife Washington State Dept of Natural Resources Washington State Dept of Transportation Washington State Parks&Recreation Commission WA Archaeological&Historic Preservation Avista Utilities Inland Power& Light Modern Electric Water Company Central Valley School District#356 East Valley School District#361 West Valley School District#363 Century Link Comcast Model Irrigation District#18 Consolidated Irrigation District#19 East Spokane Water District#1 Vera Water& Power Spokane County Water District#3 Spokane Tribe of Indians 2. Conclusion(s): No concerns are noted. F. CONCLUSION: For the reasons set forth in Section C above,the proposed amendment to amend the Comprehensive Plan and adopt the area-wide rezone to change the land use designation and zoning to of parcels 45204.1436 and 45204.1435 to MFR complies with the requirements of SVMC 17.80.140(H)and the Comprehensive Plan. Page 6 of 6 EXHIBIT 1 Proposed Comprehensive Plan Map _ C E 9th Ave E 9th Ave E10thAve E10thAve N C N q O N � E.11th-Li1 ca 0 EllthAve cn E12thAve i Legend C M U MFR POS E13thAve I MU RC II IMU ' NC SFR z N IZJ I I I Ca AU 50 100 200 300 400 Feet I I I I I File: CPA-2022-01 Request: Owner:SHFI Properties(Sunshine Health) Proposed change: Parcel(s):45204.1436 and 45204.1435 Comp Plan Map: SFR to MFR Address: 10506 E 10th and Unaddressed Zoning Map: R-3 to MFR EXHIBIT 2 Proposed Zoning Map 0 C _ Qi — II 15 E 9th Ave E 9th Ave / E10thAve E10thAve (p - C CD -0 (X q O N 0.>, E.11th-Ln_ co 0 E Ilth Ave cn E12thAve ( Legend Zoning MI j MFR CMU j///. R-1 POS RC - E 13th Ave R-2 NC al IMU -0 R-3 MU I i R-4 Z N I-1_1 I I I - Ca 1 m A 0 50 100 200 300 400 Feet I I I I I r File: CPA-2022-01 Request: Owner:SHFI Properties(Sunshine Health) Proposed change: Parcel(s):45204.1436 and 45204.1435 Comp Plan Map: SFR to MFR Address: 10506 E 10th and Unaddressed Zoning Map: R-3 to MFR EXHIBIT 3 Vicinity _ E Valley way AveE-ValleywayAve- I � - E-NixonAve 13E 6 6' r - (x _ z co z z a Main c,-E-MainAve-E rg a. E Main Ave z c 3 J0 z = z z Balfour z o m 6 Parkl z z z a ErSprague Ave ' a ° E a E 1st E 1st Awe_ 2nd Ave -E A lewa B k Ave pp Y /va. , tn - l - —E3rdAve I �+ NLrn E-4th Ave -E-4th-Ave-ca 1 I I I r1 E E5th E5th~Ct Q 0 5th ve ; r,,,,,,,,I .) .E 6th Ave E 6thAve � Ln E 6th Ave-. . �E 6th AveAe��� E 7th ct E7thAve— E 7th . Ave 0�® iiiE Archery 1 ,,,, I 13 ,,,,,,,,,,,,, E-8th-Ave 6' ■N T I E 9th Ave E-9thAve —E-9th-Ave a o�l0th E E10th - E10th 0 ct E ca A I e A I e E 11 th a—E 10th Ave-E 11th � .qwe=� � � E 11th —„Ave coi La r 1 _ N N 0 - N Central Valley E 11th Ln 6�� Opportunity Elementary p_sCf) S -Z Early Ave `> 'E 12th Ave U� j` Learning Ce J Ln 0 To s co _. II:- \( ��'� \ °cn E, 14th Ave fx.5 is E E to p ?, � E g 14th 9 �14th �' E 1 th Ave —c'a ■E 15th q. Ln s Ln 3 o`n \ 5 em EX Ve I A 0- _. c E�r16thAve ®� 6 l 3 Tar_... E 17th Ln N a�i University E 1-7-thAve-0 s—., Elementar COQ.E18th Ave , y an a) o vh —E 18th Ave E 18th Ave— E \) -1-9thAve E E 19th Ave i y E ct i E 20th Ave3-BoWdis h Oa t a Q Middle u) 0_ E 21st Ave : \\N- Ave h\ c E 22nd Ave 0 -* File: CPA-2022-01 Request: Owner:SHFI Properties(Sunshine Health) Proposed change: Parcel(s):45204.1436 and 45204.1435 Comp Plan Map: SFR to MFR Address: 10506 E 10th and Unaddressed Zoning Map: R-3 to MFR EXHIBIT 4 2020 Aerial Jr • � a 's :it JIM . ,, , •,_ -421701 -, 111111.1 igli 40 z C� CU ✓ l• a% ,. _1 , t L, ,s;�. _wy, r r y ,. ,. fi. . * li'1 YA�, .� i Otp N C� 10th - �, 1 MI pwM1 M• 0 �.- ,,i. a� kr >_ . r ca o r n 2Z ' ' f-cti '" - d • � y1 irr. y Py a '.- . -..... '. _ wi y A .. A.r.4,l • File: CPA-2022-01 Request: Owner:SHFI Properties(Sunshine Health) Proposed change: Parcel(s):45204.1436 and 45204.1435 Comp Plan Map: SFR to MFR Address: 10506 E 10th and Unaddressed Zoning Map: R-3 to MFR EXHIBIT 5 Exisitng Comprehensive Plan Map _ C E 9th Ave E 9th Ave E10thAve E10thAve C N q O N � E.11th i1 ca 0 EllthAve cn E12thAve i Legend C M U MFR POS E13thAve I MU RC II IMU NC SFR 0 0 N CO m a � A 0 50 100 200 300 400 Feet I I 1 I I File: CPA-2022-0X Request: Owner:SHFI Properties(Sunshine Health) Proposed change: Parcel(s):45204.1436 and 45204.1435 Comp Plan Map: SFR to MFR Address: 10506 E 10th and Unaddressed Zoning Map: R-3 to MFR EXHIBIT 6 Exisitng Zoning Map f I a - — E 9th Ave E 9th Ave E10thAve E10thAve (p C CD q O o. N , E.11th UI co 0 E Ilth Ave cn E 12th Ave Legend Zoning MFR C M U R-1 POS RC E 13th Ave R-2 NC IMU R-3 MU I R-4 N Ca CaA 0 50 100 200 300 400 Feet I I 1 I I File: CPA-2022-01 Request: Owner:SHFI Properties(Sunshine Health) Proposed change: Parcel(s):45204.1436 and 45204.1435 Comp Plan Map: SFR to MFR Address: 10506 E 10th and Unaddressed Zoning Map: R-3 to MFR EXHIBIT 7 COMMUNITY& PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Spokane DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE 10210 East Sprague Avenue• Spokane Valley WA 99206 galley 509.720.5000 • Fax: 509.720.5075 •planning@spokanevalley.org PROJECT:Annual amendments to the Comprehensive Plan for 2022: File Number Description Location Applicant/Owner CPA-2022-01 A request to change the Parcels 45204.1436 and SHFI comprehensive plan designation and 45204.1435; SE'/ of Section 20, PROPERTIES, zoning for 1.03 acres Single Family Township 25 North,Range 44 East, LLC/Land Use Residential(SFR)to Multifamily Willamette Meridian,Spokane Solutions and Residential(MFR). County, Washington Entitlement CPA-2022-02 A request to change land use Parcel: 55073.0458; SW '/ of Spokane Valley/ designation and zoning for 0.45 Section 07,Township 25 North, Spokane Valley acres from Single Family Residential Range 45 East, Willamette to Parks and Open Space. Meridian, Spokane County, Washington CPA-2022-03 A request to change land use Parcels:44041.0104;44041.0103; Spokane Valley/ designation and zoning for 17.64 acres 44041.0102;44041.9048; Spokane Valley from Single Family Residential to 44041.9046; and 44041.9007;NE'/ Parks and Open Space. of Section 04,Township 24 North, Range 44 East, Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washington CPA-2022-04 A request to amend Figure 27— Citywide; Spokane Valley Spokane Valley/ Bikeway Network to add north river Not applicable loop trail. LEAD AGENCY: City of Spokane Valley. DETERMINATION: Determination of Non-Significance is issued under Washington Administrative Code(WAC) 197- 11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date issued. Comments must be received by 5:00 p.m.on January 28,2022. Pursuant to Title 21, Environmental Controls of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC), the lead agency has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement is not required under Revised Code of Washington 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. STAFF CONTACT: Chaz Bates, AICP, Senior Planner, City of Spokane Valley, 10210 East Sprague Avenue, Spokane Valley, WA 99206, PH: (509) 720-5337; cbates rr spokanevallev_.org RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: Mike Basinger, AICP, Economic Development Manager, City of Spokane Valley, 10210 East Sprague Avenue, Spokane Valley, WA 99206, PH: (509) 720-5333, mbasin2er a,spokanevallev.or, DATE ISSUED: January 14, 2022 SIGNATURE:_ A,j APPEAL: An appeal of this determination shall be submitted to the Community&Pu c Works Department within fourteen (14)calendar days after the date issued. The appeal must be written and specific factual objections made to the City's threshold determination. Appeals shall be conducted in conformance with SVMC 17.90 Appeals,and any required fees pursuant to the City's adopted Fee Schedule shall be paid at the time of appeal submittal. Pursuant to WAC 197-11- 680, appeals shall be limited to a review of a final threshold determination. City of Spokane Valley Determination of Non-Significance(DNS) Page 1 of 1 File Nos.CPA-2022-01;CPA-2022-02;CPA-2022-03;CPA-2022-04 EXHIBIT 8 Project ##ePla-:D7-2 -> G> RECEIVED SEPA CHECKLIST nits SVMC 21.20 4000 Val OCT 2 6 2021 10210 E Sprague Avenue ! Spokane Valley WA 99206 CoSV P!P ;)- lr 1 ♦ Fax: (509)720-5075 i pcmiitccnterr sj kancvall_c .vrg sue # I #1 STAFF USE ONLY Date Submitted: Received by: Fee: PLUS#: File#: PART I—REQUIRED MATERIAL **THE APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF THE REQUIRED MATERIALS ARE NOT PROVIDED** ❑ Completed SEPA Checklist ❑ Application Fee ❑ Reduced Site Plan of proposal in 8Yi" by 11"or 11" by 17"size E Trip Distribution and Generation Letter, if requested by Development Engineering. PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST: The State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA),chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement(EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment.The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal,if it can be done)and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal.Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly,with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write"do not know" or"does not apply."Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems,the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects.The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. OE OF CHECKLIST FOR NON-PROJECT PROPOSALS: Complete this checklist for non-project proposals,even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NON-PROJECT ACTIONS(Part D). SEP.�'1 CHECKLIST4000 rrrr ra Wiley For non-project actions,the references in the checklist to the words"project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as"proposal," "proposer,"and "affected geographic area,"respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: N/A 2. Name of applicant: Land Use Solutions&Entitlement for Sunshine Health Facilities 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Dwight Hume agent Sunshine Health Facilities owner, Dr. Nathan Drakes CEO 9101 Mt. View Lane 10410 E 9th Avenue Spokane WA 99218 Spokane Valley WA 99206 509-435-3108 509-926-3547 4. Date checklist prepared: October 2021 5. Agency requesting checklist: Spokane Valley Planning&Zoning 6. Proposed timing or schedule(including phasing, if applicable): Summer/Fall 2022 Construction 7. Do you have any plans or future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? No If yes, explain. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. None 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal?Unknown If yes, explain. IC. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment; site plan review and approval; construction plan review and approval, landscape plan review and approval. Page 2 of 13 PL-22 V1.0 SEPA CHECKLIST «T,(. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal,including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site.There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal.You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) Non-Project Action. Map Amendment of the Comprehensive Plan from SFR to MFR and from R3 to MFR zoning. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including street address, if any, and section,township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map,if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency,you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist.The subject property consists of two parcels totaling 1.04 acres, bordered by 10th Avenue an the north, Raymond Rd on the west and 11th Avenue on the south. It is located to the east of Sunshine Health Facilities and Valley Christian Schools along the west side of Raymond Rd. 13. Does the proposed action lie within the Aquifer Sensitive Area(ASA)?Yes The general Sewer Service Area?Yes Priority Sewer Service Area?Yes (See: Spokane County's ASA Overlay zone Atlas for boundaries). 14. The following questions supplement Part A: a. Critical Aquifer Recharge Area(CARA)/Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA). 1. Describe any systems, other than those designed for the disposal of sanitary waste,installed for the purpose of discharging fluids below the ground surface(includes systems such as those for the disposal of stormwater or drainage from floor drains). Describe the type of system,the amount of materials to be disposed of through the system and the types of material likely to be disposed of (including materials which may enter the system inadvertently through spills or as a result of firefighting activities). Non-project Action, to be determined at a later date. 2. Will any chemicals(especially organic solvents or petroleum fuels) be stored in aboveground or underground storage tanks? If so,what types and quantities of material will be stored? Non-project Action,to be determined at a later date. 3. What protective measures will be taken to insure that leaks or spills of any chemicals stored or used on site will not be allowed to percolate to groundwater?This includes measures to keep chemicals out of disposal systems. Non-project Action,to be determined at a later date. Page 3 of 13 PL-22 V1.0 SEPA CHECKLIST ne 40000I1ey 4. Will any chemicals be stored, handled or used on the site in a location where a spill or leak will drain to surface or groundwater or to a stormwater disposal system discharging to surface or groundwater?Non-project Action,to be determined at a later date. b. Stormwater 1. What are the depths on the site to groundwater and to bedrock(if known)?Unknown 2. Will stormwater be discharged into the ground? If so, describe any potential impacts. Non-project Action,to be determined at a later date. B. Environmental Elements 1. Earth a. General description of the site(circle one):flat rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other b. What is the steepest slope on the site(approximate percent slope)?N/A c. What general types of soils are found on the site(for example, clay,sand,gravel, peat, much)? If you know the classification of agricultural souls, specify them and note any prime farmland. Gravel d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so,describe. No e. Describe the purpose,type,and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed.Also indicate source of fill. Non-project Action,to be determined at a later date. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing,construction,or use? If so,generally describe. Non-project Action,to be determined at a later date. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction(for example, asphalt or buildings)? Non-project Action,to be determined at a later date. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion or other impacts to the earth, if any: Non-project Action, to be determined at a later date. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, and industrial wood smoke)during construction and when the project is completed?If any,generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Non-project Action,to be determined at a later date. Page 4 of 13 PL-22 V1.0 SEPA CHECKLIST 4 b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? if so, generally describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any' Non-project Action,to be determined at a later date. 3. Water a. Surface: 1. Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds,wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate,state what stream or river it flows into. No. 2. Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to(within 200 feet)the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No. 3. Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected and the source of fill material. N/A 4. Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? No Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. 5. Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? No If so, note location on the site plan. 6. Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No b. Ground: 1. Will ground water be withdrawn,or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose,and approximate quantities known. Non-project Action,to be determined at a later date. 2. Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources,. if any(for example: Domestic sewage; industrial,containing the following chemicals;agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system,the number of such systems,the number of houses to be served(if applicable),or the number of animals or humans the system(s)are expected to serve. Page 5 of 13 PL-22 V1.0 SEPA CHECKLIST " kane 4000 Val ke` Non-project Action,to be determined at a later date. c. Water runoff(including stormwater): 1. Describe the source of runoff(including stormwater)and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so,describe. Non-project Action,to be determined at a later date 2. Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so,generally describe. Non-project Action,to be determined at a later date. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface,ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Non-project Actior, to be determined at a later date. 4. Plants a. Circle types of vegetation found on the site: 1. Deciduous tree:alder, maple, aspen,other 2. Evergreen tree:fir, cedar,pine, other 3. Shrubs 4. Grass 5. Pasture 6. Crop or grain 7. Wet soil plants:cattail, buttercup, bulrush,skunk cabbage, other 8. Water plants:water lily, eelgrass, milfoil,other 9. Other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered?Non-project Action,to be determined at a later date. C. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Unknown but unlikely due to urban setting. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Unknown but unlikely due to urban setting. S. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: 1. Birds: hawk, heron,eagle,songbirds, other 2. Mammals:deer, bear,elk, beaver,other 3. Fish:bass,salmon,trout, herring,shellfish,other Page 6 of 13 PL-22 V1.0 SEPA CHECKLIST R rr r kane .000 Valley b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Unknown c. Is the site part off a migration route? no if so,explain. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None 6. Energy and natural resources a. What kinds of energy(electric, natural gas,oil, wood stove,solar)will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs?Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing,etc. Non-project Action,to be determined at a later date. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so,generally describe. Non-project Action, to be determined at a later date. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any:Non-project Action,to be determined at a later date 7. Environmental health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion,spill, or hazardous waste that could occur as a result of this proposal? No If so,describe. 1. Describe special emergency services that might be required. None 2. Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards,if any: Non-project Action, to be determined at a later date. b. Noise 1. What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project(for example:traffic,equipment, operation, other)?None 2. What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis(for example:traffic,construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Non-project Action,to be determined at a later date 3. Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Non-project Action,to be determined at a later date 8. Land and shoreline use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties?West: Health facilities and private school; Page 7 of 13 PL-22 V1.O SEPA CHECKLIST l l#. . 00 Valley North: residential, East Residential;South:Residential b. Has the site been used for agriculture? No If so, describe. c. Describe any structures on the site. None d. Will any structures be demolished? N/A If so,what? e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? R3 f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site?SFR g. If applicable,what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site?N/A h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive"area? If so, specify. Unknown i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Non-project Action,to be determined at a later date j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace?None k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any:N/A I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans. If any:Compliance with applicable development regulations 9. Housing. a. Approximately how many units would be provide, if any?Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing.Non-project Action,to be determined at a later date b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle,or low- income housing. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: If approved,this will enable construction of senior adult care housing. 1D. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas? What is the principal exterior building materials)proposed?Non-project Action,to be determined at a Page 8 of 13 PL-22 V1.0 SEPA CHECKLIST ne Valley. later date b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Non-project Action,to be determined at a later date. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts,if any. Non-project Action, to be determined at a later date. 11. Light and glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur?Non-project Action, to be determined at a later date b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? Non-project Action, to be determined at a later date c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal?None d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Non-project Action,to be determined at a later date 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity?Valley Christian School athletic fields are available for passive recreation. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses?No If so,describe. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None 13. Historic and cultural preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? No If so,generally describe. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic,archaeological,scientific,or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None c_ Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None 14. Transportation Page 9 of 13 PL-22 V1.0 SEPA CHECKLIST "kane I0Mal ley a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Raymond Rd.will provide direct access. 10th & 11`M Avenue s would provide secondary access. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not,what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop?Route 96 is on University Rd and 16th to Pines Rd c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? Non-project Action,to be determined at a later date. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). Non-project Action,to be determined at a later date. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of)water, rail, or air transportation? No Non- project Action,to be determined at a later date. If so,generally describe. Note:This is for senior assisted living.Trips to and from the site by tenants will be minimal and determined on the individual needs and capabilities of each tenant. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project?Non-project Action,to be determined at a later date. If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: Non-project Action,to be determined at a later date. 15. Public services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example:fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so,generally describe. Non-project Action,to be determined at a later date. Note:This is being proposed in proximity to numerous health care services of the applicant. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. See above 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: 1. Electricity 2. Natural gas 3. Water 4. Refuse service 5. Telephone Page 10 of 13 PL-22 V1.0 SETA CHECKLIST Spokane Malley' 6. Sanitary sewer 7. Septic service 8. Other-describe Fiber Optics b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Non-project Action,to be determined at a later date. C. Signature The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to m it decision. Signature: - Date: Submitted: of D. Supplemental Sheet for Non-Project Actions (Do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent of the proposal,or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise?None of these impacts would occur from a senior housing assisted living project. a. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: N/A 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish,or marine life? No impacts would occur, a. Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: None 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources?No impacts are foreseen. a. Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: None Page 11 of 13 PL-22 V1.0 S1 P A CHECKLIST 7p01I1e 4,0000Valley. 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks,wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, flood plains, or prime farmlands?No impacts are foreseen. a. Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: None 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans?This is an area designated for residential living within the comprehensive plan.This map amendment and zone change would allow for an optimum use of the site for assisted senior housing in proximity to multiple health care services of the proponent. a. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: Development in full compliance with applicable development regulations. 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? These demands would be minimal due to the available health care services provided in proximity to the proposed site. a. Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s)are: See above comment 7. Identify, if possible,whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. No conflicts are foreseen from this proposed map amendment. E. Signature I, the undersigned, swear under penalty of perjury that the above responses are made truthfully and to the best of my knowledge. I also understand that, should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part, the agency may withdraw any Determination of ssigoificance that it might issue in reliance upon this check list. Date: /e,' p25 — Signature: Please print or type: Proponent: Dwight Hume, agent Page 12 of 13 PL-22 V1.0 SEPA CHECKLIST 7il rM� . ne Valley Address: 9101 N Mt.View Lane Spokane WA 99218 Phone: 509-435-3108 Person completing form (if different from proponent): Name: Address: Phone: DISCLAIMER: By accepting this permit and proceeding with the work, the applicant/permittee and owner acknowledges and agrees that: 1) If this permit is for construction of or on a dwelling, the dwelling is/will be served by potable water. 2) Ownership of this City of Spokane Valley permit inures to the property owner. 3) The applicant/permittee is the property owner or has full permission and authority to represent the property owner in this project and carry out the work specified in the permit 4) All construction is to be done in full compliance with the City of Spokane Valley Municipal Code. The applicable codes are available for review at the City of Spokane Valley Permit Center. 5) The applicant/permittee further declares that they are either: (A) a contractor currently registered and properly licensed in accordance with Chapter 18.27 RCW; (B)the registered or legal owner or authorized agent of the property for which I am applying for permit and not a licensed contractor; or (C) otherwise exempt from the requirements set forth in RCW 18.27.090 and will abide by all provisions and conditions of the exemption as stated. 6) The City of Spokane Valley permit is a permit to carry out the work as specified therein and is not a perm' or approval for any violation of federal, state or local laws, codes or ordinances. 7) Compliance with all federal, siAt .'. and local laws shall be the sole responsibility of the applicant/permittee and property owner. 8) Plans or additional information may be required to be submitted and subsequently approved before this application can be processed. The City is not responsible for any code violation through the issuance of this permit. 9) Failure to request and obtain tr _, necessary inspections and inspection approvals may necessitate stoppage of work and/or removal of certain parts of the construction at the applicant's/permittee's or property owner's expense. Page 13 of 13 PL-22 V1.0 10/25/21,8:42 AM City of Spokane Valley Zoning`- - City cif Sprokane Vallee ► clic v E th A e E J lh Av., c TI �'o- NY N^' 1 �' r CC 77, .yu 0 ` oVi tw. +`> r Ise rrp E 1311I Ave ir , 0 ; ,,,,„ ,,,,,,g,lif A"..;''',7,,; ' 7 ,, Im, i Atroot.r,,.#.1- 4•.'/0,4. 1 '',,,,,,, , * E 1 11 h,A,...t E 1:th.Avis L 1:3th !+: ric ti c2 P. Legend Layer List 4/ram https://spokanevalley.maps.arcgis.comlapps/webappviewerlindsx.html7id 5e8d56d1238413da8ea3fd7c18eeb14 1/1 10/25/21,8:42 AM City of Spokane Valley Zoning C:'11—'I of Spokane Lonloq -!,- E iluA.e E 1tiAe it 0 E 1:11h Av ff) t 701, E 11thk:e ! L 1.31h Ave E 14th A.,,e it Layer List httosJ/spokanevaltey,rnaps.arogis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=f5e8d56d1238413da9ea3fd7c18eeb14 1/1 10/25/21,8:44 AM City of Spokane Valley Land Use City of Spokane Valley Land Use., E Ili Ave C .0 V1 „7. 0 E 10th Ave E 11 th Ave 5gK F Ith Ave L 13thAvr, 1 F 1-1111,Ave E 14th Ave, Legend Layer List 37(7/Falf6*-- https://spokanevalley.maps.arcgis.corn/appsiwebappviewer/index.htmOid=4cf27c6c22cf4367b919e338dfce7aba 1/1 10/25/21,8:44 AM City of Spokane Valley Land Use pelkar11°.": 11.4 ity of Spokane Valley Laid ' E tAve E 111 Ave \-1 CC rs E 13t11 Ave tr: • E 1 llh E I:!tri .ze h 13th Ayr' ':111 CC .-14k *414ii‘h, 1 th E I 4th Ai Layer List 41L-7-F https://spokanevailey.maps.arcgis.comfapps/webappvieweriind ex.html')rd=t4cf27c6c22c14 3 b7 b91 9 e33 adfca la ba 1/1 EXHIBIT 9 Notice of Virtual Public Hearing City of Spokane Valley 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Due to the restrictions on public gatherings arising from the covid-19 outbreak,and pursuant to Governor Inslee's Stay Home,Stay Healthy Proclamation(No.20-25)and Proclamation 20-28(and associated extensions),this hearing will be conducted remotely using web and telephone conference tools,as described below. HEARING DATE AND TIME: March 10,2022,beginning at 6:00 p.m. ZOOM MEETING DETAILS: Join Zoom Meeting A link to the Zoom meeting will be provided on the agenda and posted to the Planning Commission webpage: www.spokanevalley.org/planningcommission. HEARING BODY: Spokane Valley Planning Commission The Planning Commission will hold a public hearing to receive public comment on the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment requests and make a recommendation to the City Council on each of the following applications: FILE No.CPA-2022-01:A request to change the comprehensive plan designation and zoning for 1.03 acres Single Family Residential(SFR)to Multifamily Residential(MFR)for parcels 45204.1436 and 45204.1435;SE 1/4 of Section 20,Township 25 North,Range 44 East,Willamette Meridian,Spokane County,Washington FILE No.CPA-2022-02:A request to change land use designation and zoning for 0.45 acres from Single Family Residential(SFR)to Parks and Open Space(POS)for parcel: 55073.0458;SW 1/4 of Section 07,Township 25 North, Range 45 East,Willamette Meridian,Spokane County,Washington FILE No.CPA-2022-03 A request to change land use designation and zoning for 17.64 acres from Single Family Residential(SFR)to Parks and Open Space(POS)for parcels:44041.0104;44041.0103;44041.0102;44041.9048; 44041.9046;and 44041.9007;NE 1/4 of Section 04,Township 24 North,Range 44 East,Willamette Meridian, Spokane County,Washington FILE No.CPA-2022-04:A request to amend Figure 27—Bikeway Network to add north river loop trail. STAFF CONTACT:Chaz Bates,AICP,Senior Planner;(509)720-5337 cbates@spokanevalley.org ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: The City issued a Determination of Non-significance(DNS)on January 14, 2022 pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA)and chapter 21.20 Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC). HEARING PROCEDURES: The Planning Commission will conduct the remote hearing pursuant to the rules of procedure adopted in SVMC Title 18(Boards and Authorities). The public is encouraged to submit written comments prior to the hearing by sending the comments to Chaz Bates, 10210 E Sprague Ave,Spokane Valley,WA 99206,or email to cbates@spokanevalley.org. You may also hand deliver your comments to City Hall.All comments will need to be received by 4:00 PM on March 9,2022,for them to be prepared for submission into the record.Comments received will be entered into the record at the time of the public participation portion of the Public Hearing. All interested persons may testify at the remote public hearing via the zoom meeting address and/or phone number. Interested persons will need to sign up to speak no later than 4:00 p.m.on March 10,2022.Please visit the Planning Commission webpage(see link above)to sign up for oral public comments.This is not an opportunity for questions or discussion.Remarks will be limited to three minutes per person. Written comments and documents may only be submitted prior to the hearing. Any appeal of the Planning Commission's decision will be based on the record established before the Planning Commission,pursuant to SVMC 17.90(Appeals). The Planning Commission will forward a recommendation on the request to the Spokane Valley City Council. STAFF REPORT AND INSPECTION OF FILE: A staff report will be available for inspection seven(7)calendar days before the hearing.The staff report and application file may be inspected by visiting the Comprehensive Plan webpage at www.spokanevalley.org/CP. If you have any questions,please contact Chaz Bates,Senior Planner, Economic Development Division,at cbates@spokanevalley.org. Carrie Koudelka,CMC Spokane Valley Deputy City Clerk Publish:February 11,2022 and February 18,2022 EXHIBIT 10 � STT T, pn air trAir 4't 1889 14 STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY 4601 N Monroe Street • Spokane, Washington 99205-1295 • (509)329-3400 January 27, 2022 Chaz Bates, AICP Senior Planner City of Spokane Valley 10210 East Sprague Avenue Spokane Valley, WA 99206 Re: 2022 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment File: CPA-2022-01, 02, 03, and 04 Dear Chaz Bates: Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the Determination of Nonsignificance regarding the 2022 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment (Proponent: City of Spokane Valley and Land Use Solutions). After reviewing the documents, the Department of Ecology (Ecology) submits the following comments: Water Quality Program-Shannon Adams (509) 329-3610 The four SEPA Checklists for the four Comprehensive Plan Amendments appear to be "non-project actions" related to zone changes. Please keep in mind that future soil disturbances at the individual sites may require separate SEPA review. If any of these future projects disturb over one acre of soil and discharge off site, they may also require a Construction Stormwater General Permit. For more information in obtaining a Construction Stormwater General Permit, or for other technical assistance, please contact Shannon Adams at (509) 329-3610 or via email at Shannon.Adams@ecy.wa.gov. State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA)-Cindy Anderson (509) 329-3442 Ecology bases comments upon information submitted for review. As such, comments made do not constitute an exhaustive list of the various authorizations you may need to obtain, nor legal requirements you may need to fulfill in order to carry out the proposed action. Applicants should remain in touch with their Local Responsible Officials or Planners for additional guidance. For information on the SEPA Process, please contact Cindy Anderson at (509) 329-3442 or via email at Cindy.Anderson@ecy.wa.gov. Chaz Bates January 27, 2022 Page 2 To receive more guidance on or to respond to the comments made by Ecology, please contact the appropriate staff listed above at the phone number or email provided. Department of Ecology Eastern Regional Office (Ecology File: 202200232) cc: Dwight Hume, Land Use Solutions EXHIBIT 11 Public Comments (Inserted as received) COMMUNITY& PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT crrs �� BUILDING&PLANNING DIVISION Spokane STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION v CPA-2022-02 STAFF REPORT DATE: February 16, 2022 HEARING DATE AND LOCATION: March 3,2022,beginning at 6:00 p.m.,remotely via Zoom. Project Number: CPA-2022-02 Application Description: A request to change land use designation and zoning for.45 acres from Single Family Residential to Parks and Open Space. Location: Parcel: 55073.0458; SW 1/4 of Section 07,Township 25 North,Range 45 East,Willamette Meridian, Spokane County,Washington Applicant: City of Spokane Valley, 10210 E Sprague, Spokane Valley,WA 99206 Owners: City of Spokane Valley Date of Application: November 1,2021 Staff Contact: Chaz Bates, Senior Planner, 10210 E Sprague Avenue, Spokane Valley, WA 99206 APPROVAL CRITERIA: Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan, Title 17 Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) General Provisions, Title 19 SVMC Zoning Regulations, and Title 21 SVMC Environmental Controls. ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit 1: Proposed Comprehensive Plan Map Exhibit 7: Environmental Determination Exhibit 2: Proposed Zoning Map Exhibit 8: SEPA Checklist Exhibit 3: Vicinity Map Exhibit 9: Notice of Public Hearing Exhibit 4: 2020 Aerial Exhibit 10: Agency Comments Exhibit 5: Existing Comprehensive Plan Map Exhibit 11: Public Comments Exhibit 6: Existing Zoning A. BACKGROUND INFORMATION PROPERTY INFORMATION Size and Characteristics: The property consists of a single parcel totaling .45 acres in size located on the northeast corner of N. Flora Road and E.Montgomery Avenue. The property is adjacent to the Flora Road Centennial Trailhead. Comprehensive Plan: Single Family Residential(SFR) Zoning: Single-Family Residential Suburban(R-2) Existing Land Use: Vacant Page 1 of 6 Staff Report CPA-2022-02 SURROUNDING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN,ZONING,AND LAND USES Comprehensive Plan: Parks,Recreation, and Open Space (P/OS) North Zoning: Parks,Recreation, and Open Space (P/OS) Uses: Centennial Trail Comprehensive Plan: SFR South Zoning: Single Family Residential Urban (R-3) Uses: Vacant land Comprehensive Plan: SFR East Zoning: R-2 Uses: Single-family residence Comprehensive Plan: SFR West Zoning: R-2 Uses: Single-family residence SUMMARY AND IMPLICATIONS OF PROPOSED AMENDMENT: If adopted the amendment will add .45 acres to the City's park land. The parcel is expected to provide needed land for a proposed pedestrian bridge associated with the north river loop trail. The parcel will also provide enhanced access to the Centennial Trail at the Flora Road trailhead. APPLICATION PROCESSING: Chapter 17.80 Permit Processing Procedures in the SVMC. The following summarizes key application procedures for the proposal. Application Submitted: October 2,2021 SEPA Determination of Non-Significance Issue date January 14,2022 End of Appeal Period for DNS: January 28,2022 Date of Mailed Notice of Public Hearing February 18,2022 Date of Published Notice of Public Hearing: February 11 and 18,2022 B. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO SEPA 1. Findings: Pursuant to Title 21 (Environmental Controls) SVMC, the lead agency has determined that the proposal does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). The City issued a Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) for the proposal on January 14, 2022. The determination was made after review of a completed environmental checklist, the application, Titles 19, 21, and 22 of the SVMC, a site assessment, public and agency comments, the Comprehensive Plan and associated Environmental Impact Statement. 2. Conclusion(s): The procedural requirements of the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) and Title 21 SVMC have been fulfilled. Page 2 of 6 Staff Report CPA-2022-02 C. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT AND AREA-WIDE REZONE i. The City may approve Comprehensive Plan amendments and area-wide zone map amendments if it complies with the approval criteria in SVMC 17.80.140(H). (1) The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to the public health, safety, welfare,and protection of the environment; Analysis: The proposed amendment to change the designation for.45 acres from SFR to P/OS bears a substantial relationship to the public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment. In 2021, the City purchased the parcel from Spokane County for the river loop trail project and for future access improvements to the Centennial Trail at Flora Rd for the purpose of expanding /increasing access to the City's park lands. This area was generally identified as New Park Area 6 in the 2019 Parks and Recreation Master Plan. These plans were developed through an extensive community engagement process. Additionally, the expansion is necessary to maintain the adopted Level of Service(LOS) 3.25 acres of park land for every 1,000 residents. (2) The proposed amendment is consistent with the requirements of Chapter 36.70A RCW and with the portion of the City's adopted Plan not affected by the amendment; Analysis: The proposed amendment is consistent with the requirements of Chapter 36.70A RCW and with the portion of the City's adopted Plan not affected by the amendment. The Growth Management Act (GMA) adopts fourteen goals to guide the development of local comprehensive plans and development regulations. The proposal is consistent with the GMA goals to enhance recreational opportunities and develop parks and recreation facilities. Additionally, the GMA requires a Parks and Recreation element to be a part of the adopted comprehensive plan. The City's Comprehensive Plan adopts the Parks Plan by reference. The proposed amendment will not have unanticipated impacts on other areas of the Comprehensive Plan. (3) The proposed amendment responds to a substantial change in conditions beyond the property owner's control applicable to the area within which the subject property lies; Analysis: The proposed amendment does not respond to a substantial change in conditions beyond the property owner's control applicable to the area within which the subject property lies. (4) The proposed amendment corrects an obvious mapping error; or Analysis: The amendment is not in response to a mapping error and would not correct any error. (5) The proposed amendment addresses an identified deficiency in the Comprehensive Plan. Analysis: The proposed amendment will address a documented deficiency of park land in the Comprehensive Plan. ii. The City must also consider the following factors prior to approving Comprehensive Plan amendments: Page 3 of 6 Staff Report CPA-2022-02 (6) The effect upon the physical environment; Analysis: The change to P/OS will not impact the physical environment. The change will result in less intensive uses than are currently allowed in SFR reducing the potential effects on the physical environment. (7) The effect on open space, streams,rivers, and lakes; Analysis: According to the City's Critical Area map, the parcel is not impacted by any known critical areas, such as wetlands, fish and wildlife habitat areas, geologically hazardous areas or frequently flooded areas. The parcel is located within shoreline jurisdiction and designated in the Shoreline Master Program as Shoreline Residential Upland. There are no known surface water quality or quantity issues. Chapter 21.40 SVMC and the City's Shoreline Master Program will ensure that adequate protection of the critical areas and adjacent land shorelands are addressed at the time of future development. (8) The compatibility with and impact on adjacent land uses and surrounding neighborhoods; Analysis: The proposed amendment is compatible with the surrounding land uses. Future development of the park space will remedy a documented need and location identified in the 2019 Parks and Recreation Master Plan. (9) The adequacy of and impact on community facilities including utilities, roads, public transportation,parks,recreation, and schools; Analysis: Sewer and water are available to the site. The nearest formal park is Greenacres Park approximately 1.25 miles to the southeast, the Centennial Trail is immediately to the north, and across the Spokane River is the newly acquired Flora Park property. The proposal will increase park land and allow future development to access the newly acquired Flora Park property as part of the north river loop trail proposal. The site is served by Flora Road, an Urban Major Collector. The existing and forecast Level of Service (LOS)for Flora Road at this location is A-C which is within the adopted LOS;Montgomery Ave at this location is a local access street and does not have an adopted LOS. There are no planned capacity or preservation projects planned in this area. (10) The benefit to the neighborhood, City, and region; Analysis: The proposed amendment will provide benefits to the neighborhood and City by providing an opportunity to provide access to planned improvements on the north side of the river. (11) The quantity and location of land planned for the proposed land use type and density and the demand for such land; Analysis: The quantity and location of park land is planned for and needed as identified in the Parks Plan.An access point at this location furthers the goals of the Parks Plan and Comprehensive Plan and would provide easy access for pedestrians and bicycles. (12) The current and projected population density in the area; and Analysis: The proposed change would have minimal impact on projected population density. Page 4 of 6 Staff Report CPA-2022-02 (13) The effect upon other aspects of the Comprehensive Plan. Analysis: The proposal will not have an impact on other aspects of the Comprehensive Plan. In addition to meeting the goals in the Parks and Recreation Master Plan the proposed amendment addresses the following goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan: a. LU-G2 Provide for land uses that are essential to Spokane Valley residents, employees, and visitors. b. LU-P18 Enable public open spaces. c. P-Gl Develop, grow, and maintain a diverse and accessible park, recreation, trail, and open space system that enhances community character. d. P-P5 Design parks and community facilities to provide easy access for pedestrians, bicycles, autos, and public transit. e. P-P8 Plan for access to parks, trails, and other open spaces in all neighborhoods. Conclusion(s): For the reasons outlined above the proposed amendment is consistent with SVMC 17.80.140(H). D. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO PUBLIC COMMENTS 1. Findings: Staff has received no public comments to date. Comments received following the date of this staff report will be provided to the Planning Commission at the March 10,2022 meeting. 2. Conclusion(s): Notice of Public Hearing (NOPH)was published on February 11 and 18, 2022. The NOPH was posted on site on February 17,2022 and mailed on February 18,2022 to residents within an 400 foot radius. E. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO AGENCY COMMENTS 1. Findings: Staff has not received any agency comments of significance to date. Agency Received Comments Comments Dated City of Spokane Valley Senior Traffic Engineer City of Spokane Valley Development Engineering City of Spokane Valley Building& Planning City of Spokane Valley Parks&Recreation Spokane Valley Fire Department City of Millwood City of Liberty Lake City of Spokane City of Spokane Valley Police Department Spokane County,Building and Planning Spokane County,Environmental Services Spokane County, Clean Air Agency Spokane County,Fire District No. 1 Page 5 of 6 Staff Report CPA-2022-02 Spokane County,Fire District No. 8 Spokane County Regional Health District Spokane Regional Clean Air Agency Spokane Aquifer Joint Board Spokane Transit Authority(STA) Spokane Regional Transportation Council(SRTC) Washington State Dept of Commerce Washington State Dept of Ecology (Olympia) Washington State Dept of Ecology(Spokane) Washington State Dept of Fish& Wildlife Washington State Dept of Natural Resources Washington State Dept of Transportation Washington State Parks&Recreation Commission WA Archaeological&Historic Preservation Avista Utilities Inland Power& Light Modern Electric Water Company Central Valley School District#356 East Valley School District#361 West Valley School District#363 Century Link Comcast Model Irrigation District#18 Consolidated Irrigation District#19 East Spokane Water District#1 Vera Water& Power Spokane County Water District#3 Spokane Tribe of Indians 2. Conclusion(s): No concerns are noted. F. CONCLUSION: For the reasons set forth in Section C above, the proposed amendment to amend the Comprehensive Plan and adopt the area-wide rezone to change the land use designation and zoning to of parcel 55073.0458 to P/OS complies with the requirements of the SVMC 17.80.140(H) and the Comprehensive Plan. Page 6 of 6 EXHIBIT 1 Proposed Comprehensive Plan Map ikd Spokane River M State Parks 1- Centennial Trail ' wed o E Mansfield_ Ave CO o a.- ff E Knox Ave Legend E--Knox Ln CMU IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII M F R POS I M U RC IMU NC SFR E Indiana Ave N A 0 50 100 200 300 400 _ Feet I r 1 1 1 1 1 .N1 1 1 1 I r File: CPA-2022-02 Request: Owner:Spokane Valley Proposed change: Parcel(s):55073.0458 Comp Plan Map: SFR to P/OS Address: 17105 E Montgomery Ave Zoning Map: R-2 to P/OS EXHIBIT 2 Proposed Zoning Map ,ikd Spokane River WA State Parks - me Centennial Trail ocoed P e Moth r. E Mansfield_ Avea Ct CO o � Legend Er_ I _ Z r- - Zoning IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIId MFR CMU — M' R-1 POS RC E-Knox-Ln R-2 NC I M U R-3 MU I R-4 _ • E Indiana Ave• N IZJ I I I 0 50 100 200 300 400 _ A Feet 1 r 1 1 1 1 / I \I I I 1 I i File: CPA-2022-02 Request: Owner:Spokane County Proposed change: (Spokane Valley in process of purchase) Comp Plan Map: SFR to P/OS Parcel(s):55073.0458 Zoning Map: R-2 to P/OS Address: 17105 E Montgomery Ave EXHIBIT 3 Vicinity E Industrial Park C St -a c iina a) _ E Industrial Park a W D St E= Z E Industrial Park E St E Dalton Ave Z E Euclid Ave $ �. E Euclid Ave co L. 0 Ave `` E Marietta Z Ems. Cl) 'G WA State Parks - Z Centennial Trail Q ..4 1L 0 E Montgomery Ave cE Knox E v Ave Mansfield Z EShannon Ave E Knox Ave Ave E Indiana Ave co 0 o .0 U E Nora Ave a � 0 i 0 Z ct -0 4. Spokane River Q ;� J� 0 i0 h ct E Flora Pit Rd Z 0 0 - 0 0 o Z z 14 Z U Z i e ,\'(` icr a tji U E Maxwell Ave VI a m Q Greenacres 'Indiana Ave ` m PJe ct c Z z Park 4790 F Oes�e o Z E Boone Ave z o E Boonegve tvy F�9oF tCt Z E Desrnet— r c J �' Ave z iii File: CPA-2022-02 Request: Owner:Spokane County Proposed change: (Spokane Valley in process of purchase) Comp Plan Map: SFR to P/OS Parcel(s):55073.0458 Zoning Map: R-2 to P/OS Address: 17105 E Montgomery Ave EXHIBIT 4 2020 Aerial k, i ,k oli• ,;.: -'• 1*-'• ,,T,... .: ..- -.,•_-,- '„,. -. -'"„ij ,-,` - :, .- -1-,-,-:.'' :'- „ -, ..- ;',' ' i :I r''' ;!"S'. ' - tilt Ittle .. i )� �'S'dvhmib 6 Y 11 .S al,.. .4 e , ilte, \L'Q State Parks a Centennial Trail f . W f�{ EMI •i( y,. i "„ '' 't Fi 11,..--ad." It'. z F r)� ,M1,„' si! n�� •. G �....' ^- •' -.... .,.fie +. `"- "0'l �., � y Monsn. kM r sad:" a ,, q' s>�' P �. -u +b e - x iga.- CI L J ,. M- ... •... Z' i r7 YYS _ mitm u IJ File: CPA-2022-02 Request: Owner:Spokane County Proposed change: (Spokane Valley in process of purchase) Comp Plan Map: SFR to P/OS Parcel(s):55073.0458 Zoning Map: R-2 to P/OS Address: 17105 E Montgomery Ave EXHIBIT 5 Exisitng Comprehensive Plan Map ikd \13�a Spokane River M State Parks1- Centennial Trail , o�eY`1 w n E M° th E Mansfield_ Ave CO off Fun.,v a too Legend E-Knox L-n CMU MFR POS I MU RC IMU ' NC SFR E Indiana Ave N A 0 50 100 200 300 400 _ Feet r I I I I / I v I I I I 0, File: CPA-2022-02 Request: Owner:Spokane County Proposed change: (Spokane Valley in process of purchase) Comp Plan Map: SFR to P/OS Parcel(s):55073.0458 Zoning Map: R-2 to P/OS Address: 17105 E Montgomery Ave EXHIBIT 6 Existing Zoning Map Rd �o°a Spokane River WA State Parks - me Centennial Trail ocoed P e Moth r. E Mansfield_ Avea Ct CO o � Legend Er_ I _ Z r- - Zoning IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIId MFR CMU — M' R-1 POS RC E-Knox-Ln R-2 NC I M U R-3 MU I R-4 _ • E Indiana Ave• N IZJ I I I 0 50 100 200 300 400 _ A Feet 1 r 1 1 1 1 / I \I I I 1 I i File: CPA-2022-02 Request: Owner:Spokane County Proposed change: (Spokane Valley in process of purchase) Comp Plan Map: SFR to P/OS Parcel(s):55073.0458 Zoning Map: R-2 to P/OS Address: 17105 E Montgomery Ave EXHIBIT 7 COMMUNITY& PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Spokane DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE 10210 East Sprague Avenue• Spokane Valley WA 99206 galley 509.720.5000 • Fax: 509.720.5075 •planning@spokanevalley.org PROJECT:Annual amendments to the Comprehensive Plan for 2022: File Number Description Location Applicant/Owner CPA-2022-01 A request to change the Parcels 45204.1436 and SHFI comprehensive plan designation and 45204.1435; SE'/ of Section 20, PROPERTIES, zoning for 1.03 acres Single Family Township 25 North,Range 44 East, LLC/Land Use Residential(SFR)to Multifamily Willamette Meridian,Spokane Solutions and Residential(MFR). County, Washington Entitlement CPA-2022-02 A request to change land use Parcel: 55073.0458; SW '/ of Spokane Valley/ designation and zoning for 0.45 Section 07,Township 25 North, Spokane Valley acres from Single Family Residential Range 45 East, Willamette to Parks and Open Space. Meridian, Spokane County, Washington CPA-2022-03 A request to change land use Parcels:44041.0104;44041.0103; Spokane Valley/ designation and zoning for 17.64 acres 44041.0102;44041.9048; Spokane Valley from Single Family Residential to 44041.9046; and 44041.9007;NE'/ Parks and Open Space. of Section 04,Township 24 North, Range 44 East, Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washington CPA-2022-04 A request to amend Figure 27— Citywide; Spokane Valley Spokane Valley/ Bikeway Network to add north river Not applicable loop trail. LEAD AGENCY: City of Spokane Valley. DETERMINATION: Determination of Non-Significance is issued under Washington Administrative Code(WAC) 197- 11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date issued. Comments must be received by 5:00 p.m.on January 28,2022. Pursuant to Title 21, Environmental Controls of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC), the lead agency has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement is not required under Revised Code of Washington 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. STAFF CONTACT: Chaz Bates, AICP, Senior Planner, City of Spokane Valley, 10210 East Sprague Avenue, Spokane Valley, WA 99206, PH: (509) 720-5337; cbates rr spokanevallev_.org RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: Mike Basinger, AICP, Economic Development Manager, City of Spokane Valley, 10210 East Sprague Avenue, Spokane Valley, WA 99206, PH: (509) 720-5333, mbasin2er a,spokanevallev.or, DATE ISSUED: January 14, 2022 SIGNATURE:_ A,j APPEAL: An appeal of this determination shall be submitted to the Community&Pu c Works Department within fourteen (14)calendar days after the date issued. The appeal must be written and specific factual objections made to the City's threshold determination. Appeals shall be conducted in conformance with SVMC 17.90 Appeals,and any required fees pursuant to the City's adopted Fee Schedule shall be paid at the time of appeal submittal. Pursuant to WAC 197-11- 680, appeals shall be limited to a review of a final threshold determination. City of Spokane Valley Determination of Non-Significance(DNS) Page 1 of 1 File Nos.CPA-2022-01;CPA-2022-02;CPA-2022-03;CPA-2022-04 EXHIBIT 8 t��r �� '°~ �� SEPA CHECKLIST S 1ne SVMC 21.20 . Millet' 10210 E Sprague Avenue♦ Spokane Valley WA 99206 Phone: (509)720-5240 •Fax: (509)720-5075 •permitcenterJ)spokanevalley.org STAFF USE ONLY Date Submitted: Received by: Fee: Not Applicable_ PLUS #: File#: PART I - REQUIRED MATERIAL **THE APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF THE REQUIRED MATERIALS ARE NOT PROVIDED** ❑ Completed SEPA Checklist ❑ Application Fee ❑ Reduced Site Plan of proposal in 81/2" by 11" or 11" by 17" size ❑ Trip Distribution and Generation Letter, if requested by Development Engineering. PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions.An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment.The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done)and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly,with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or"does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NON-PROJECT PROPOSALS: Complete this checklist for non-project proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NON-PROJECT ACTIONS(Part D). PL-22 V1.0 Page 1 of 14 S``"� `-- SEPA CHECKLIST A ne Valley For non-project actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: CPA-2022-0002. An amendment to the Future Land Use Map of the 2017-2037 Comprehensive Plan. 2. Name of applicant: City of Spokane Valley 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Chaz Bates, Senior Planner, Economic Development Division, Spokane Valley,WA 99206 4. Date checklist prepared: October 28, 2021 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Spokane Valley 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Anticipated adoption June 2022. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? Yes. If yes, explain. The space will be developed as future access improvement and potential use to support a pedestrian bridge to access recently acquired park property on the north side of the river. Development is planned only and future development will require a separate SEPA process. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) was completed for the City's Comprehensive Plan. The document is titled 2017-2037 Comprehensive Plan Final Environmental Impact Statement(FEIS) and supporting Development Regulations. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? None If yes, explain. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Approval by City Council 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal.You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) The amendment is to change approximately 0.45 acres of Single Family Residential (SFR) designated land to Parks, Recreation and Open Space(P/OS). The change would formally recognize the public ownership and intended use of the property. PL-22 V1.0 Page 2 of 14 S``"� `-- SEPA CHECKLIST A ne Valley 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The proposal is addressed as 17105 E Montgomery,the property is undeveloped The parcel number is 55073.0458 and can be further located using these coordinates 47.677763, -117.17486767. 13. Does the proposed action lie within the Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA)? Yes. The general Sewer Service Area? Yes. Priority Sewer Service Area? No. (See: Spokane County's ASA Overlay zone Atlas for boundaries). 14. The following questions supplement Part A. a. Critical Aquifer Recharge Area (CARA)/Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA). 1. Describe any systems, other than those designed for the disposal of sanitary waste, installed for the purpose of discharging fluids below the ground surface (includes systems such as those for the disposal of Stormwater or drainage from floor drains). Describe the type of system, the amount of material to be disposed of through the system and the types of material likely to be disposed of (including materials which may enter the system inadvertently through spills or as a result of firefighting activities). This is a non-project action changing the future land use map. Future development would be analyzed under separate SEPA process. 2. Will any chemicals (especially organic solvents or petroleum fuels) be stored in aboveground or underground storage tanks? If so, what types and quantities of material will be stored? This is a non-project action changing the future land use map. Future development would be analyzed under separate SEPA process. 3. What protective measures will be taken to insure that leaks or spills of any chemicals stored or used on site will not be allowed to percolate to groundwater? This includes measures to keep chemicals out of disposal systems. This is a non-project action changing the future land use map. Future development would be analyzed under separate SEPA process. 4. Will any chemicals be stored, handled or used on the site in a location where a spill or leak will drain to surface or groundwater or to a Stormwater disposal system discharging to surface or groundwater? This is a non-project action changing the future land use map. Future development would be analyzed under separate SEPA process. b. Stormwater 1. What are the depths on the site to groundwater and to bedrock (if known)? PL-22 V1.0 Page 3 of 14 S``"� `-- SEPA CHECKLIST A ne Valley Unknown. 2. Will stormwater be discharged into the ground? If so, describe any potential impacts. This is a non-project action changing the future land use map and does not evaluate a specific future use. Any future changes will be reviewed under existing stormwater regulations. B. ENVIRONMENTALELEMENTS EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY 1 ) Earth a.General description of the site (check one): flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other Future development would be analyzed under separate SEPA process. b.What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 7 percent. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. This is a non-project action changing the future land use map. The site is currently undeveloped and the application does not evaluate a specific future use. Any future changes will be reviewed under a separate SEPA process. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? No. If so, describe. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Also indicate source of fill. Not applicable. c. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? Not applicable. If so, generally describe. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Not applicable. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Not applicable PL-22 V1.0 Page 4 of 14 S``"� `-- SEPA CHECKLIST A ne Valley 2) Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, EVALUATION FOR automobile,odors, industrial wood smoke)during construction and when the AGENCY USE ONLY project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Not applicable. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? No. If so, generally describe.. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Not applicable. 3) Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. Yes. The Spokane River is to the north. The Spokane River is a shoreline of the state. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? Not applicable. If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Future development of the site will require review for potential impacts to the shoreline. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. Not applicable. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No. PL-22 V1.0 Page 5 of 14 S``"� `-- SEPA CHECKLIST A ne Valley 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? No. If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. Not applicable. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. Not applicable. c. Water runoff(including stormwater): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. The site is currently undeveloped. This is a non-project action changing the future land use map and does not evaluate a specific future use. Any future changes will be reviewed under stormwater regulations in place at time of development. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? Not applicable. If so, generally describe. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: The proposal is a non-project action and does not have a direct effect on the surface, ground or runoff water. PL-22 V1.0 Page 6 of 14 S``"� `-- SEPA CHECKLIST A ne Valley EVALUATION FOR 4) Plants AGENCY USE ONLY a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: ❑ deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other ❑shrubs ❑ grass ❑ pasture ❑ crop or grain ❑ wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other ❑ water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other ❑ other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? None proposed. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: The proposal is a non-project action development of any future development will be analyzed under a separate SEPA. The city has adopted development standards to preserve and enhance vegetation. 5) Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site ❑ birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, ❑ other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, ❑ other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known. c. Is the site part of a migration route? Not applicable. If so, explain. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: The proposal is a non-project action. Future re-development of the site will be analyzed under a separate SEPA. The city has adopted development standards to preserve and enhance fauna. PL-22 V1.0 Page 7 of 14 S``"� `-- SEPA CHECKLIST A ne Valley EVALUATION FOR 6). Energy and natural resources AGENCY USE ONLY a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Not applicable. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. Not applicable. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Not applicable. 7) Environmental health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe: The proposal is a non- project action changing the land use designation from Single Family Residential to Parks, Recreation and Open Space, there are no known environmental health hazards that could occur as a result of this proposal. The development of the park will be analyzed under a separate SEPA. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Not applicable. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: Not applicable. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? The site is within a residential neighborhood and adjacent to the Centennial Trail it's unlikely these noises will affect park use. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Not applicable. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Not applicable. PL-22 V1.0 Page 8 of 14 S``"� `-- SEPA CHECKLIST A ne Valley EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY 8). Land and shoreline use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The site is currently owned by Spokane County and the City of Spokane Valley is in the process of purchasing the land. The right-of-way immediately west of the site is currently used as an access point to the Centennial Trail. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. Not known. c. Describe any structures on the site. There are no structures on the site. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Single Family Residential f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Single Family Residential g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Shoreline Residential Upland h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No,the property is within shoreline jurisdiction though. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? None. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? Not applicable. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: Not applicable. I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: Not applicable. PL-22 V1.0 Page 9 of 14 S``"� `-- SEPA CHECKLIST A ne Valley EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY 9) Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Not applicable. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Not applicable. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: Not applicable. 10). Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? Not applicable. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Not applicable. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Not applicable. 11). Light and glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Not applicable. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? Not applicable. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? Not applicable. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Not applicable. PL-22 V1.0 Page 10 of 14 S``"� `-- SEPA CHECKLIST A ne Valley EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY 12) Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? The nearest formal park is Greenacres Park approximately 1.25 miles (on the road network) to the southeast, the Centennial Trail is immediately to the north, and across the Spokane River is the newly acquired Flora Park property. The proposal will increase park land and allow future development to access the newly acquired Flora Park property as part of the north river loop trail proposal. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: The city's adopted comprehensive plan adopts a level of service for park space. The city has an adopted Park and Recreation Master Plan that provides strategies meet adopted levels of service for projected growth. This area was generally identified as New Park Area 6 in the 2019 Parks and Recreation Master Plan. 13). Historic and cultural preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. Not applicable. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: Not applicable. 14). Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The site is currently undeveloped. Montgomery Dr and Flora, local access streets provide access to the site. There is no formal park space for the Centennial Trail acces. b. c. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? No. d. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the projecteliminate? Not applicable. PL-22 V1.0 Page 11 of 14 S``"� `-- SEPA CHECKLIST A ne Valley e. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to EVALUATION FOR existing roads or streets, not including driveways? Not applicable. If so, AGENCY USE ONLY generally describe (indicate whether public or private). f. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? Not applicable. If so, generally describe. g. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? Not applicable. If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: The city's adopted comprehensive plan adopts a level of service for transportation services. There are no planned capacity improvements to the transportation network in this area. 15) Public services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No. The city's adopted comprehensive plan adopts a level of service for public services. Future development will be analyzed under a separate SEPA for impacts to those services. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. Not applicable. 16) Utilities a. Check utilities currently available at the site: ❑ electricity, ❑ natural gas, ❑water, ❑ refuse service, ❑ telephone, ❑ sanitary sewer, ❑ septic system, ❑ other- describe. While the site is undeveloped it has access to a variety of utilities including water, sewer, refuse service, and electricity. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Not applicable. C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: Chaz Bates Date Submitted: 10/28/2021 PL-22 V1.0 Page 12 of 14 S``"� `-- SEPA CHECKLIST A ne Valley D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NON-PROJECT ACTIONS (Do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? The proposed amendment is not likely to increase emissions to air, production of noise, and discharge to water. The amendment is within the scope of impacts analyzed in the Final Environmental Impact Statement for the 2017-2037 Comprehensive Plan and supporting development regulations. a. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: Consistent with the FEIS of the 2017-2037 Comprehensive Plan, the city adopted implementing regulations while mitigating impacts to the natural environment including an updated critical areas ordinance. On a planning level the adopted regulatory scheme has been identified as sufficient to avoid and reduce impacts to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise. Site specific impacts will be reviewed and mitigated at the time of development based upon adopted regulations within the Spokane Valley. 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? The proposed amendment anticipated not to have impacts on plants and animals. The amendment is within the scope of impacts analyzed in the Final Environmental Impact Statement for the 2017-2037 Comprehensive Plan and supporting development regulations. a. Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: Consistent with the FEIS of the 2017-2037 Comprehensive Plan, the city adopted implementing regulations while mitigating impacts to the natural environment including an updated critical areas ordinance. On a planning level the adopted regulatory scheme has been identified as sufficient to protect and conserve plants and animals. Site specific impacts will be reviewed and mitigated at the time of development based upon adopted regulations within the Spokane Valley at that time. 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? The proposed amendment anticipated not to have impacts on energy and natural resources. The amendment is within the scope of impacts analyzed in the Final Environmental Impact Statement for the 2017-2037 Comprehensive Plan and supporting development regulations. a. Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: Consistent with the FEIS of the 2017-2037 Comprehensive Plan, the city adopted implementing regulations to protect and conserve energy and natural resources. On a planning level, the adopted regulatory scheme has been identified as sufficient to protect and conserve energy and natural resources. Site specific impacts will be reviewed and mitigated at the time of development based upon adopted regulations within the Spokane Valley at that time. PL-22 V1.0 Page 13 of 14 S``"� `-- SEPA CHECKLIST A Valley ne 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? The proposed amendment will not impact environmentally sensitive areas as none exist on the site. a. Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: Not applicable. 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? The proposed amendment will not affect any shorelines as none are near or on the site. a. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: Not applicable. 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? The proposed amendment may increase demand on transportation and public services if the site is redeveloped or developed more intensively. The amendment is within the scope of impacts analyzed in the Final Environmental Impact Statement for the 2017-2037 Comprehensive Plan and supporting development regulations. a. Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: The Comprehensive Plan adopts a level-of-service for transportation and public services. The Final Environmental Impact Statement for the 2017-2037 Comprehensive Plan and the 6- year Transportation Improvement Program identifies the necessary projects to maintain the adopted LOS. These transportation and public service projects are implemented both by the city and state and at the project level through concurrency. 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. The proposal does not conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. Any specific issues that may arise during the development of the site will be identified and addressed based upon regulations within the Spokane Valley Municipal Code. E. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, swear under penalty of perjury that the above responses are made truthfully and to the best of my knowledge. I also understand that, should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part, the agency may withdraw any Determination of Nonsignificance that it might issue in reliance upon this check list. Date: 10/28/2021 Signature: Chaz Bates Please print or type: Proponent: City of Spokane Valley Address: 10210 East Sprague Avenue; Spokane Valley, WA 99206 PL-22 V1.0 Page 14 of 14 �'"�� SEPA CHECKLIST Spokane 1 Val ley Phone: (509) 720-5000 Person completing form (if different from proponent): Name: Chaz Bates, Senior Planner, City of Spokane Valley Economic Development Division Address: 10210 E Sprague Ave Spokane Valley, WA 99206 Phone: 509-720-5337 PL-22 V1.0 Page 15 of 14 EXHIBIT 9 Notice of Virtual Public Hearing City of Spokane Valley 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Due to the restrictions on public gatherings arising from the covid-19 outbreak,and pursuant to Governor Inslee's Stay Home,Stay Healthy Proclamation(No.20-25)and Proclamation 20-28(and associated extensions),this hearing will be conducted remotely using web and telephone conference tools,as described below. HEARING DATE AND TIME: March 10,2022,beginning at 6:00 p.m. ZOOM MEETING DETAILS: Join Zoom Meeting A link to the Zoom meeting will be provided on the agenda and posted to the Planning Commission webpage: www.spokanevalley.org/planningcommission. HEARING BODY: Spokane Valley Planning Commission The Planning Commission will hold a public hearing to receive public comment on the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment requests and make a recommendation to the City Council on each of the following applications: FILE No.CPA-2022-01:A request to change the comprehensive plan designation and zoning for 1.03 acres Single Family Residential(SFR)to Multifamily Residential(MFR)for parcels 45204.1436 and 45204.1435;SE 1/4 of Section 20,Township 25 North,Range 44 East,Willamette Meridian,Spokane County,Washington FILE No.CPA-2022-02:A request to change land use designation and zoning for 0.45 acres from Single Family Residential(SFR)to Parks and Open Space(POS)for parcel: 55073.0458;SW 1/4 of Section 07,Township 25 North, Range 45 East,Willamette Meridian,Spokane County,Washington FILE No.CPA-2022-03 A request to change land use designation and zoning for 17.64 acres from Single Family Residential(SFR)to Parks and Open Space(POS)for parcels:44041.0104;44041.0103;44041.0102;44041.9048; 44041.9046;and 44041.9007;NE 1/4 of Section 04,Township 24 North,Range 44 East,Willamette Meridian, Spokane County,Washington FILE No.CPA-2022-04:A request to amend Figure 27—Bikeway Network to add north river loop trail. STAFF CONTACT:Chaz Bates,AICP,Senior Planner;(509)720-5337 cbates@spokanevalley.org ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: The City issued a Determination of Non-significance(DNS)on January 14, 2022 pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA)and chapter 21.20 Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC). HEARING PROCEDURES: The Planning Commission will conduct the remote hearing pursuant to the rules of procedure adopted in SVMC Title 18(Boards and Authorities). The public is encouraged to submit written comments prior to the hearing by sending the comments to Chaz Bates, 10210 E Sprague Ave,Spokane Valley,WA 99206,or email to cbates@spokanevalley.org. You may also hand deliver your comments to City Hall.All comments will need to be received by 4:00 PM on March 9,2022,for them to be prepared for submission into the record.Comments received will be entered into the record at the time of the public participation portion of the Public Hearing. All interested persons may testify at the remote public hearing via the zoom meeting address and/or phone number. Interested persons will need to sign up to speak no later than 4:00 p.m.on March 10,2022.Please visit the Planning Commission webpage(see link above)to sign up for oral public comments.This is not an opportunity for questions or discussion.Remarks will be limited to three minutes per person. Written comments and documents may only be submitted prior to the hearing. Any appeal of the Planning Commission's decision will be based on the record established before the Planning Commission,pursuant to SVMC 17.90(Appeals). The Planning Commission will forward a recommendation on the request to the Spokane Valley City Council. STAFF REPORT AND INSPECTION OF FILE: A staff report will be available for inspection seven(7)calendar days before the hearing.The staff report and application file may be inspected by visiting the Comprehensive Plan webpage at www.spokanevalley.org/CP. If you have any questions,please contact Chaz Bates,Senior Planner, Economic Development Division,at cbates@spokanevalley.org. Carrie Koudelka,CMC Spokane Valley Deputy City Clerk Publish:February 11,2022 and February 18,2022 EXHIBIT 10 � STT T, pn air trAir 4't 1889 14 STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY 4601 N Monroe Street • Spokane, Washington 99205-1295 • (509)329-3400 January 27, 2022 Chaz Bates, AICP Senior Planner City of Spokane Valley 10210 East Sprague Avenue Spokane Valley, WA 99206 Re: 2022 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment File: CPA-2022-01, 02, 03, and 04 Dear Chaz Bates: Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the Determination of Nonsignificance regarding the 2022 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment (Proponent: City of Spokane Valley and Land Use Solutions). After reviewing the documents, the Department of Ecology (Ecology) submits the following comments: Water Quality Program-Shannon Adams (509) 329-3610 The four SEPA Checklists for the four Comprehensive Plan Amendments appear to be "non-project actions" related to zone changes. Please keep in mind that future soil disturbances at the individual sites may require separate SEPA review. If any of these future projects disturb over one acre of soil and discharge off site, they may also require a Construction Stormwater General Permit. For more information in obtaining a Construction Stormwater General Permit, or for other technical assistance, please contact Shannon Adams at (509) 329-3610 or via email at Shannon.Adams@ecy.wa.gov. State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA)-Cindy Anderson (509) 329-3442 Ecology bases comments upon information submitted for review. As such, comments made do not constitute an exhaustive list of the various authorizations you may need to obtain, nor legal requirements you may need to fulfill in order to carry out the proposed action. Applicants should remain in touch with their Local Responsible Officials or Planners for additional guidance. For information on the SEPA Process, please contact Cindy Anderson at (509) 329-3442 or via email at Cindy.Anderson@ecy.wa.gov. Chaz Bates January 27, 2022 Page 2 To receive more guidance on or to respond to the comments made by Ecology, please contact the appropriate staff listed above at the phone number or email provided. Department of Ecology Eastern Regional Office (Ecology File: 202200232) cc: Dwight Hume, Land Use Solutions EXHIBIT 11 Public Comments (Inserted as received) COMMUNITY& PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT �� BUILDING&PLANNING DIVISION Sperrsokane STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION v CPA-2022-03 STAFF REPORT DATE: February 16, 2022 HEARING DATE AND LOCATION: March 3,2022,beginning at 6:00 p.m.,remotely via Zoom. Project Number: CPA-2022-03 Application Description: A request to change land use designation and zoning for 17.64 acres from Single Family Residential to Parks and Open Space. Location: 44041.0104; 44041.0103; 44041.0102; 44041.9048; 44041.9046; and 44041.9007;NE 1/4 of Section 04,Township 24 North,Range 44 East, Willamette Meridian, Spokane County,Washington Applicant: City of Spokane Valley, 10210 E Sprague, Spokane Valley,WA 99206 Owners: City of Spokane Vaelly Date of Application: November 1,2021 Staff Contact: Chaz Bates, Senior Planner, 10210 E Sprague Avenue, Spokane Valley, WA 99206 APPROVAL CRITERIA: Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan, Title 17 Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) General Provisions, Title 19 SVMC Zoning Regulations, and Title 21 SVMC Environmental Controls. ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit 1: Proposed Comprehensive Plan Map Exhibit 7: Environmental Determination Exhibit 2: Proposed Zoning Map Exhibit 8: SEPA Checklist Exhibit 3: Vicinity Map Exhibit 9: Notice of Public Hearing Exhibit 4: 2020 Aerial Exhibit 10: Agency Comments Exhibit 5: Existing Comprehensive Plan Map Exhibit 11: Public Comments Exhibit 6: Existing Zoning A. BACKGROUND INFORMATION PROPERTY INFORMATION Size and Characteristics: The property consists of six parcels totaling 17.64 acres. The property is located on the southeast corner of E. 44th Avenue and S. Bates Road and extends to the Union Pacific railroad. Comprehensive Plan: Single Family Residential(SFR) Zoning: Single-Family Residential Suburban(R-2) Existing Land Use: Vacant Page 1 of 6 Staff Report CPA-2022-03 SURROUNDING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN,ZONING,AND LAND USES Comprehensive Plan: SFR North Zoning: R-2 and Single Family Residential Urban(R-3) Uses: Vacant Comprehensive Plan: SFR South Zoning: R-2 Uses: Single-family residences Comprehensive Plan: Right-of-way (ROW), County Low Density Residential(LDR) East Zoning: ROW, County LDR Uses: Single-family residence and vacant land Comprehensive Plan: SFR West Zoning: R-2 Uses: Fire Station and single family residences SUMMARY AND IMPLICATIONS OF PROPOSED AMENDMENT: If adopted the amendment will add 17.64 acres to the City's park land. A portion of the property is expected to be used for a new Fire District 8 fire station. The portion of the parcels are expected to provide needed park land for a documented need identified in the City's Park and Recreation Master Plan. APPLICATION PROCESSING: Chapter 17.80 Permit Processing Procedures in the SVMC. The following summarizes key application procedures for the proposal. Application Submitted: October 2,2021 SEPA Determination of Non-Significance Issue date January 14,2022 End of Appeal Period for DNS: January 28,2022 Date of Mailed Notice of Public Hearing February 18,2022 Date of Published Notice of Public Hearing: February 11 and 18,2022 B. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO SEPA 1. Findings: Pursuant to Title 21 (Environmental Controls) SVMC, the lead agency has determined that the proposal does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). The City issued a Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) for the proposal on January 14, 2022. The determination was made after review of a completed environmental checklist, the application, Titles 19, 21, and 22 of the SVMC, a site assessment, public and agency comments, the Comprehensive Plan and associated Environmental Impact Statement. 2. Conclusion(s): The procedural requirements of the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) and Title 21 SVMC have been fulfilled. C. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT AND REZONE i. The City may approve Comprehensive Plan amendments and area-wide zone map amendments if it complies with the approval criteria in SVMC 17.80.140(H). Page 2 of 6 Staff Report CPA-2022-03 (1) The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to the public health, safety, welfare,and protection of the environment; Analysis: The proposed amendment to change the designation for 17.64 acres from SFR to P/OS bears a substantial relationship to the public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment. In 2021, the City purchased six parcels southeast of the intersection of 44th Avenue and Bates Road for the purpose of expanding the City's park lands. This area was generally identified as New Park Area 3 in the 2019 Parks and Recreation Master Plan, which was developed through an extensive community engagement process. Additionally, the expansion is necessary to maintain the adopted Level of Service(LOS)3.25 acres of park land for every 1,000 residents. (2) The proposed amendment is consistent with the requirements of Chapter 36.70A RCW and with the portion of the City's adopted Plan not affected by the amendment; Analysis: The proposed amendment is consistent with the requirements of Chapter 36.70A RCW and with the portion of the City's adopted Plan not affected by the amendment. The Growth Management Act(GMA)adopts fourteen goals to guide the development of local comprehensive plans and development regulations. The proposal is consistent with the GMA goals to enhance recreational opportunities and develop parks and recreation facilities. Additionally, the GMA requires a Parks and Recreation element to be a part of the adopted comprehensive plan. The City's Comprehensive Plan adopts the Parks Plan by reference. The proposed amendment will not have unanticipated impacts on other areas of the Comprehensive Plan. (3) The proposed amendment responds to a substantial change in conditions beyond the property owner's control applicable to the area within which the subject property lies; Analysis: The proposed amendment does not respond to a substantial change in conditions beyond the property owner's control applicable to the area within which the subject property lies. (4) The proposed amendment corrects an obvious mapping error; or Analysis: The amendment is not in response to a mapping error. (5) The proposed amendment addresses an identified deficiency in the Comprehensive Plan. Analysis: The proposed amendment will address a documented deficiency of park land in the Comprehensive Plan. ii. The City must also consider the following factors prior to approving Comprehensive Plan amendments: (6) The effect upon the physical environment; Analysis: The change to P/OS will not impact the physical environment. The change will result in less intensive uses than are currently allowed in SFR reducing the potential effects on the physical environment. (7) The effect on open space, streams,rivers, and lakes; Page 3 of 6 Staff Report CPA-2022-03 Analysis: According to the City's Critical Area map, the eastern parcels are within a Geological Hazardous area identified as Quanternary Alluvium, development of the site may require additional report or studies. There are no known other critical areas associated with the site, such as wetlands, fish and wildlife habitat areas, or frequently flooded areas. The parcels are not located within shoreline jurisdiction, and there are no known surface water quality or quantity issues. Chapter 21.40 SVMC will ensure that adequate protection of the critical areas and adjacent land use are addressed at the time of future development. (8) The compatibility with and impact on adjacent land uses and surrounding neighborhoods; Analysis: The proposed amendment is compatible with the surrounding land uses. Future development of the park space will provide a documented need and location identified in the 2019 Parks and Recreation Master Plan. (9) The adequacy of and impact on community facilities including utilities, roads, public transportation,parks,recreation, and schools; Analysis: Sewer and water are available to the site. The nearest formal park is Castle Park approximately 2 miles to the north, the Glenrose Unit of Dishman Hills is approximately 1.5 miles to west. The proposal will increase park land and future development will enhance the park system helping maintain the adopted LOS. (10) The benefit to the neighborhood, City, and region; Analysis: The proposed amendment will provide benefits to the neighborhood and City by providing an opportunity to provide park space to the neighborhood. The expansion of park space in this area will help the City meet its adopted LOS for park land. (11) The quantity and location of land planned for the proposed land use type and density and the demand for such land; Analysis: The quantity and location of park land is planned for and needed as identified in the Parks Plan. A neighborhood park at this location furthers the goals of the Parks Plan and Comprehensive Plan. The site provides easy access for pedestrians, bicycles, and automobiles (12) The current and projected population density in the area; and Analysis: The proposed change would have minimal impact on projected population density. (13) The effect upon other aspects of the Comprehensive Plan. Analysis: The proposal will not have an impact on other aspects of the Comprehensive Plan.In addition to meeting the goals in the Parks and Recreation Master Plan the proposed amendment addresses the following goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan: LU-G2 Provide for land uses that are essential to Spokane Valley residents, employees, and visitors. LU-P18 Enable public open spaces. Page 4 of 6 Staff Report CPA-2022-03 P-Gl Develop, grow, and maintain a diverse and accessible park, recreation, trail, and open space system that enhances community character. P-P5 Design parks and community facilities to provide easy access for pedestrians, bicycles, autos, and public transit. P-P8 Plan for access to parks, trails, and other open spaces in all neighborhoods. Conclusion(s): For the reasons outlined above the proposed amendment is consistent with SVMC 17.80.140(H). D. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO PUBLIC COMMENTS 1. Findings: Staff has received no public comments to date. Comments received following the date of this staff report will be provided to the Planning Commission at the March 10,2022 meeting. 2. Conclusion(s): Notice of Public Hearing (NOPH)was published on February 11 and 18, 2022. The NOPH was posted on site on February 17,2022 and mailed on February 18,2022 to residents within an 400 foot radius. E. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO AGENCY COMMENTS 1. Findings: Staff has not received any agency comments of significance to date. Agency Received Comments Comments Dated City of Spokane Valley Senior Traffic Engineer City of Spokane Valley Development Engineering City of Spokane Valley Building& Planning City of Spokane Valley Parks&Recreation Spokane Valley Fire Department City of Millwood City of Liberty Lake City of Spokane City of Spokane Valley Police Department Spokane County,Building and Planning Spokane County,Environmental Services Spokane County, Clean Air Agency Spokane County,Fire District No. 1 Spokane County,Fire District No. 8 Spokane County Regional Health District Spokane Regional Clean Air Agency Spokane Aquifer Joint Board Spokane Transit Authority(STA) Spokane Regional Transportation Council(SRTC) Washington State Dept of Commerce Washington State Dept of Ecology (Olympia) Washington State Dept of Ecology(Spokane) Page 5 of 6 Staff Report CPA-2022-03 Washington State Dept of Fish& Wildlife Washington State Dept of Natural Resources Washington State Dept of Transportation Washington State Parks&Recreation Commission WA Archaeological&Historic Preservation Avista Utilities Inland Power& Light Modern Electric Water Company Central Valley School District#356 East Valley School District#361 West Valley School District#363 Century Link Comcast Model Irrigation District#18 Consolidated Irrigation District#19 East Spokane Water District#1 Vera Water& Power Spokane County Water District#3 Spokane Tribe of Indians 2. Conclusion(s): No concerns are noted. F. CONCLUSION: For the reasons set forth in Section C above,the proposed amendment to amend the Comprehensive Plan and adopt the area-wide rezone to change the land use designation and zoning to of parcels 44041.0104; 44041.0103; 44041.0102; 44041.9048; 44041.9046; and 44041.9007 to P/OS complies with the requirements of SVMC 17.80.140(H) and the Comprehensive Plan. Page 6 of 6 EXHIBIT 1 Proposed Comprehensive Plan Map 0 • E 44th Ave • E Thorpe Rd _Ei 46th Ave Ct �a m m � �•C r� . .E ` l O 47th E 47th Ave a Ct ct a 1 Legend &St 6Ilk e C M U In J M F R POS eI M U RC IMU ' NC SFR ...,..., r N I—LJ I I 1 A 0 50 100 200 300 400 Feet File: CPA-2022-03 Request: Owner:Spokane Valley, 10210 E Sprague Comp Plan Map: SFR to POS Parcel(s):44041.0104, 44041.0103, 44041.0102, Zoning Map: R-2 to POS 44041.9048, 44041.9046, 44041.9007 Address: Unaddressed EXHIBIT 2 Proposed Zoning Map E 44th Ave • E Thorpe Rd _Ei 46th Ave C a m m CO Q1� • r� L . .E ` l O 47th E 47th Ave a Ct CC a IP Legend 1 Zoning MI i MFR CMU _.- Art R-1 POS RC Dr pe Ilk NO R-2 NC - IMU pr Ok‘ R-3 MU I R-4 ...,..., r N I—LJ I I I A 0 50 100 200 300 400 Feet File: CPA-2022-03 Request: Owner:Spokane Valley, 10210 E Sprague Comp Plan Map: SFR to POS Parcel(s):44041.0104, 44041.0103, 44041.0102, Zoning Map: R-2 to POS 44041.9048, 44041.9046, 44041.9007 Address: Unaddressed EXHIBIT 3 Vicinity v Cl) a N F37th Ct E 3 7th' ki, E a E 37th Ave m E 38th Ave Ln `� z E o o- o �� co o \s• 38th 38th a ,y F N J•� Ave Ave -cS�a %Ave SEagle m co E 40th Ave a _E 4.0th=A=ve iF �, s s to* m0, y OOz. � ct� Cl)c/) n s,� ca o 43 ,Qry = a ,0 �v' - � a yii aF _ CD 73 °UnaOwn cr Dr Ci;- Z ;� a) E u' i 42ncy 0- C N ZI E 44th Ave E 45th E Chester v Cr' Ave III E Thorpe-Rd—Ridge Ln a) co E 46th Ave a c co a a h 00��� o f Dickens Ln CC E 0 a �o E 47th QJ� .�a_o 0- 47th Ct e co 7 ,`a o c L.. mE 48th Ave P, 3 0 Nk- -� Z `n � Sv.- z—ai co o E A� �� ��� V EAunnic Ln cn n 0 �e�,Dr O �� �GzLn S `� �0 mac, Z Q0 S 3 u cfree E co o E E 5 l/ �� yc o�� cn a O,t -Ferret Dr m O��Pc Egsh 4 o E Van c,0 En`� Cl) �+ � E KloWa Marter t\de 0 �4 F qo G`,k 6 y m EQo j c0, Rimrock E Honeycomb 4' 0 a� e/��4 Ln Springs Ln N E A he pac F �eDr Q. kr Stkr efre,to 1 File: CPA-2022-03 Request: Owner:Spokane Valley, 10210 E Sprague Comp Plan Map: SFR to POS Parcel(s):44041.0104, 44041.0103, 44041.0102, Zoning Map: R-2 to POS 44041.9048, 44041.9046, 44041.9007 Address: Unaddressed EXHIBIT 4 2020 Aerial ,fig, Z CO (4 1 W; E 44th Ave • /�. '` Yw t 46th QZG a .,,,A , . / 0 „ I .,,O 4' Clar am: 441;r m .''' ' 4, e m n, r mio ,' ,', %'..^ " ' '.' ''' .F:. r' � s� J 7 x , �� art d E 47th Ct E 47th Ave IT - _ I m. -- L.r _ fir a ' e 9 Yr a` FF ' 1Co ./..',,,,,i. / .- , 4„ „,. ,,,,, 1�J7.u ,$�r p �wAmy _ , .‘; ,„„ 44, 1, File: CPA-2022-03 Request: Owner:Spokane Valley, 10210 E Sprague Comp Plan Map: SFR to POS Parcel(s):44041.0104, 44041.0103, 44041.0102, Zoning Map: R-2 to POS 44041.9048, 44041.9046, 44041.9007 Address:Unaddressed EXHIBIT 5 Exisitng Comprehensive Plan Map F E 44th Ave E Thorpe Rd _Ei 46th Ave Ct �a m m � �•C rs . .E ` J O 47th E 47th Ave a Ct ct a 6.1 1 Legend �S1 6 In J C M U M F R POS pr ,, p P,e _ eI M U ` RC 1_, IMU NC SFR ...,..., r N ILJ I I 1 A 0 50 100 200 300 400 Feet ♦� 'I File: CPA-2022-03 Request: Owner:Spokane Valley, 10210 E Sprague Comp Plan Map: SFR to POS Parcel(s):44041.0104, 44041.0103, 44041.0102, Zoning Map: R-2 to POS 44041.9048, 44041.9046, 44041.9007 Address: Unaddressed EXHIBIT 6 Existing Zoning Map F . . E 44th Ave E Thorpe Rd _Ei 46th Ave C a 0 iCO - .c rs . .E ` J O 47th E 47th Ave a Ct Ct a Legend 1111! Zoning IV11 MFR CMU $tr j//� R 1 POS RC Dr pe III it .0 R 2 NC IMU pr Ol(r R-3 MU I R-4 ...,..., r N I—LJ I I I A 0 50 100 200 300 400 Feet File: CPA-2022-03 Request: Owner:Spokane Valley, 10210 E Sprague Comp Plan Map: SFR to POS Parcel(s):44041.0104, 44041.0103, 44041.0102, Zoning Map: R-2 to POS 44041.9048, 44041.9046, 44041.9007 Address: Unaddressed EXHIBIT 7 COMMUNITY& PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Spokane DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE 10210 East Sprague Avenue• Spokane Valley WA 99206 galley 509.720.5000 • Fax: 509.720.5075 •planning@spokanevalley.org PROJECT:Annual amendments to the Comprehensive Plan for 2022: File Number Description Location Applicant/Owner CPA-2022-01 A request to change the Parcels 45204.1436 and SHFI comprehensive plan designation and 45204.1435; SE'/ of Section 20, PROPERTIES, zoning for 1.03 acres Single Family Township 25 North,Range 44 East, LLC/Land Use Residential(SFR)to Multifamily Willamette Meridian,Spokane Solutions and Residential(MFR). County, Washington Entitlement CPA-2022-02 A request to change land use Parcel: 55073.0458; SW '/ of Spokane Valley/ designation and zoning for 0.45 Section 07,Township 25 North, Spokane Valley acres from Single Family Residential Range 45 East, Willamette to Parks and Open Space. Meridian, Spokane County, Washington CPA-2022-03 A request to change land use Parcels:44041.0104;44041.0103; Spokane Valley/ designation and zoning for 17.64 acres 44041.0102;44041.9048; Spokane Valley from Single Family Residential to 44041.9046; and 44041.9007;NE'/ Parks and Open Space. of Section 04,Township 24 North, Range 44 East, Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washington CPA-2022-04 A request to amend Figure 27— Citywide; Spokane Valley Spokane Valley/ Bikeway Network to add north river Not applicable loop trail. LEAD AGENCY: City of Spokane Valley. DETERMINATION: Determination of Non-Significance is issued under Washington Administrative Code(WAC) 197- 11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date issued. Comments must be received by 5:00 p.m.on January 28,2022. Pursuant to Title 21, Environmental Controls of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC), the lead agency has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement is not required under Revised Code of Washington 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. STAFF CONTACT: Chaz Bates, AICP, Senior Planner, City of Spokane Valley, 10210 East Sprague Avenue, Spokane Valley, WA 99206, PH: (509) 720-5337; cbates rr spokanevallev_.org RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: Mike Basinger, AICP, Economic Development Manager, City of Spokane Valley, 10210 East Sprague Avenue, Spokane Valley, WA 99206, PH: (509) 720-5333, mbasin2er a,spokanevallev.or, DATE ISSUED: January 14, 2022 SIGNATURE:_ A,j APPEAL: An appeal of this determination shall be submitted to the Community&Pu c Works Department within fourteen (14)calendar days after the date issued. The appeal must be written and specific factual objections made to the City's threshold determination. Appeals shall be conducted in conformance with SVMC 17.90 Appeals,and any required fees pursuant to the City's adopted Fee Schedule shall be paid at the time of appeal submittal. Pursuant to WAC 197-11- 680, appeals shall be limited to a review of a final threshold determination. City of Spokane Valley Determination of Non-Significance(DNS) Page 1 of 1 File Nos.CPA-2022-01;CPA-2022-02;CPA-2022-03;CPA-2022-04 EXHIBIT 8 'olnP SEPA CHECKLIST Y SVMC 21.20 . alley 10210 E Sprague Avenue♦ Spokane Valley WA 99206 Phone: (509)720-5240 •Fax: (509)720-5075 •permitcenterJ)spokanevalley.org STAFF USE ONLY Date Submitted: October 30, 2021 Received by: Fee: Not Applicable_ PLUS#: File#: CPA-2021-0002 PART I - REQUIRED MATERIAL **THE APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF THE REQUIRED MATERIALS ARE NOT PROVIDED** ❑ Completed SEPA Checklist ❑ Application Fee ❑ Reduced Site Plan of proposal in 81/2" by 11" or 11" by 17" size ❑ Trip Distribution and Generation Letter, if requested by Development Engineering. PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21 C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions.An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done)and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or"does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NON-PROJECT PROPOSALS: Complete this checklist for non-project proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NON-PROJECT ACTIONS(Part D). PL-22 V1.0 Page 1 of 14 Cl I p"f.H�anG' SEPA CHECKLIST S „_ Val ley For non-project actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: CPA-2022-03. An amendment to the Future Land Use Map of the 2017-2037 Comprehensive Plan. 2. Name of applicant: City of Spokane Valley 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Chaz Bates, Senior Planner, Economic Development Division, Spokane Valley,WA 99206 4. Date checklist prepared: October 27, 2021 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Spokane Valley 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Anticipated adoption June 2022. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? Yes. If yes, explain. The space will be developed in the future as a park space. Development is planned only, future development may require a separate SEPA process. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)was completed for the City's Comprehensive Plan. The document is titled 2017-2037 Comprehensive Plan Final Environmental Impact Statement(FEIS) and supporting Development Regulations. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? None If yes, explain. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Approval by City Council 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal.You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) The amendment is to change approximately 17 acres of Single Family Residential (SFR) designated land to Parks, Recreation and Open Space (P/OS). The change would formally recognize the public ownership and intended use of the property. PL-22 V1.0 Page 2 of 14 Cl I Y f.H�ane p SEPA CHECKLIST S „_ .•.Valley 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The proposal is generally located south of 44th Ave, east of Bates Rd, north of 47th Ave, and west of Dishman Mica Rd. The property is vacant and unaddressed. The parcel numbers are 44041.0104, 44041.0104, 44041.0102, 44041.9007, 44041.9046, and 44041.9048 and can be further located using these coordinates 47.612990, -117.248544. 13. Does the proposed action lie within the Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA)? Yes. The general Sewer Service Area? Yes. Priority Sewer Service Area? No. (See: Spokane County's ASA Overlay zone Atlas for boundaries). 14. The following questions supplement Part A. a. Critical Aquifer Recharge Area (CARA)/Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA). 1. Describe any systems, other than those designed for the disposal of sanitary waste, installed for the purpose of discharging fluids below the ground surface (includes systems such as those for the disposal of Stormwater or drainage from floor drains). Describe the type of system, the amount of material to be disposed of through the system and the types of material likely to be disposed of (including materials which may enter the system inadvertently through spills or as a result of firefighting activities). This is a non-project action changing the future land use map. Future development would be analyzed under separate SEPA process. 2. Will any chemicals (especially organic solvents or petroleum fuels) be stored in aboveground or underground storage tanks? If so, what types and quantities of material will be stored? This is a non-project action changing the future land use map. Future development would be analyzed under separate SEPA process. 3. What protective measures will be taken to insure that leaks or spills of any chemicals stored or used on site will not be allowed to percolate to groundwater? This includes measures to keep chemicals out of disposal systems. This is a non-project action changing the future land use map. Future development would be analyzed under separate SEPA process. 4. Will any chemicals be stored, handled or used on the site in a location where a spill or leak will drain to surface or groundwater or to a Stormwater disposal system discharging to surface or groundwater? This is a non-project action changing the future land use map. Future development would be analyzed under separate SEPA process. b. Stormwater PL-22 V1.0 Page 3 of 14 Cl I p"f.H�anG' SEPA CHECKLIST S _Valley 1. What are the depths on the site to groundwater and to bedrock (if known)? Unknown. 2. Will stormwater be discharged into the ground? If so, describe any potential impacts. This is a non-project action changing the future land use map and does not evaluate a specific future use. Any future changes will be reviewed under existing stormwater regulations. B. ENVIRONMENTALELEMENTS EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY 1 ) Earth a.General description of the site (check one): flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other Future development would be analyzed under separate SEPA process. b.What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percentslope)? 5 percent. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. This is a non-project action changing the future land use map. The site is currently undeveloped and the application does not evaluate a specific future use.Any future changes will be reviewed under a separate SEPA process. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? No. If so, describe. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Also indicate source of fill. Not applicable. c. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? Not applicable. If so, generally describe. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Not applicable. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Not applicable PL-22 V1.0 Page 4 of 14 Cl I p"f.H�anG' SEPA CHECKLIST S _Valley 2) Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, EVALUATION FOR automobile,odors,industrial wood smoke)during construction and when the AGENCY USE ONLY project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Not applicable. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that mayaffect your proposal? Yes. If so, generally describe. The site is access via local access streets (44th Ave and Bates Rd), Dishman Mica is to the east across Union Pacific Railroad, Dishman Mica at this location has approximately 3,600 average daily trips. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Not applicable. 3) Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. No. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? Not applicable. If yes, please describe and attach available plans. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. Not applicable. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No. PL-22 V1.0 Page 5 of 14 Cl I p"f.H�anG' SEPA CHECKLIST S _Valley 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? No. If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. Not applicable. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. Not applicable. c. Water runoff(including stormwater): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. The site is currently undeveloped. This is a non-project action changing the future land use map and does not evaluate a specific future use. Any future changes will be reviewed under stormwater regulations in place at time of development. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? Not applicable. If so, generally describe. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: The proposal is a non-project action and does not have a direct effect on the surface, ground or runoff water. PL-22 V1.0 Page 6 of 14 Cl I p"f.H�anG' SEPA CHECKLIST S _Valley EVALUATION FOR 4) Plants AGENCY USE ONLY a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: ❑ deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other ❑shrubs ❑ grass ❑ pasture ❑ crop or grain ❑ wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other ❑ water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other ❑ other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? None proposed. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: The proposal is a non-project action development of any future development will be analyzed under a separate SEPA. The city has adopted development standards to preserve and enhance vegetation. 5) Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site ❑ birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, ❑ other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, ❑ other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known. c. Is the site part of a migration route? Not applicable. If so, explain. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: The proposal is a non-project action. Future re-development of the site will be analyzed under a separate SEPA. The city has adopted development standards to preserve and enhance fauna. PL-22 V1.0 Page 7 of 14 Cl I p"f.H�anG' SEPA CHECKLIST S _Valley EVALUATION FOR 6). Energy and natural resources AGENCY USE ONLY a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Not applicable. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. Not applicable. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Not applicable. 7) Environmental health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe: The proposal is a non- project action changing the land use designation from Single Family Residential to Parks, Recreation and Open Space, there are no known environmental health hazards that could occur as a result of this proposal. The development of the park will be analyzed under a separate SEPA. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Not applicable. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: Not applicable. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? The site is within a residential neighborhood and adjacent to railroad tracks it is unlikely these noises will affect park use. Future development may account for these noises in design. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Not applicable. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Not applicable. PL-22 V1.0 Page 8 of 14 Cl I p"f.H�anG' SEPA CHECKLIST S _Valley EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY 8). Land and shoreline use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The site is currently owned by the City of Spokane Valley and is unused formally. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. Not known. c. Describe any structures on the site. There are no structures on the site. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Single Family Residential f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Single Family Residential g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Not applicable. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. The northeast portion of the site is identified as Geologically Hazardous further identified as Quaternary Alluvium. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? None. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? Not applicable. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: Not applicable. I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: Not applicable. PL-22 V1.0 Page 9 of 14 Cl I p"f.H�anG' SEPA CHECKLIST S _Valley EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY 9) Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Not applicable. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Not applicable. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: Not applicable. 10). Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? Not applicable. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Not applicable. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Not applicable. 11 ). Light and glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Not applicable. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? Not applicable. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? Not applicable. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Not applicable. PL-22 V1.0 Page 10 of 14 Cl I p"f.H�anG' SEPA CHECKLIST S _Valley EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY 12) Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity?The nearest formal park is Castle Park approximately 2 miles(on the road network)to the north,the Glenrose Unit of Dishman Hills is approximately 1.5 miles to west. There are no park facilities at Castle Park or Glenrose Unit of the Dishman Hills b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any:The city's adopted comprehensive plan adopts a level of service for park space. The city has an adopted Park and Recreation Master Plan that provides strategies meet adopted levels of service for projected growth. A park in this neighborhood was identified in the Park and Recreation Master Plan as New Park Area 3. 13). Historic and cultural preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. Not applicable. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: Not applicable. 14). Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The site is currently undeveloped. There are some informal access points on 44th Ave and another at the end of Sands Rd to the south. b. c. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? No. d. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? Not applicable. PL-22 V1.0 Page 11 of 14 SaY Cl I Y f.H k �;� I].G' SEPA CHECKLIST 4000 Valley e. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to EVALUATION FOR existing roads or streets, not including driveways? Not applicable. If so, AGENCY USE ONLY generally describe(indicate whether public or private).While the land use change does not require improvement, future site development will improve access to the new park space. f. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? Not applicable. If so, generally describe. g. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? Not applicable. If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: The city's adopted comprehensive plan adopts a level of service for transportation services. There are no planned capacity improvements to the transportation network in this area. 15) Public services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No. The city's adopted comprehensive plan adopts a level of service for public services. Future development will be analyzed under a separate SEPA for impacts to those services. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. Not applicable. 16) Utilities a. Check utilities currently available at the site: ❑ electricity, ❑ natural gas, ❑water, ❑ refuse service, ❑ telephone, ❑ sanitary sewer, ❑ septic system, ❑ other- describe. While the site is undeveloped it has access to a variety of utilities including water, sewer, refuse service, and electricity. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Not applicable. C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: Chaz Bates Date Submitted: 10/27/2021 PL-22 V1.0 Page 12 of 14 Cl I p"f.H�anG' SEPA CHECKLIST S _Valley D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NON-PROJECT ACTIONS (Do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal,would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? The proposed amendment is not likely to increase emissions to air, production of noise, and discharge to water. The amendment is within the scope of impacts analyzed in the Final Environmental Impact Statement for the 2017-2037 Comprehensive Plan and supporting development regulations. a. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: Consistent with the FEIS of the 2017-2037 Comprehensive Plan, the city adopted implementing regulations while mitigating impacts to the natural environment including an updated critical areas ordinance. On a planning level the adopted regulatory scheme has been identified as sufficient to avoid and reduce impacts to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise. Site specific impacts will be reviewed and mitigated at the time of development based upon adopted regulations within the Spokane Valley. 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? The proposed amendment anticipated not to have impacts on plants and animals. The amendment is within the scope of impacts analyzed in the Final Environmental Impact Statement for the 2017-2037 Comprehensive Plan and supporting development regulations. a. Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: Consistent with the FEIS of the 2017-2037 Comprehensive Plan, the city adopted implementing regulations while mitigating impacts to the natural environment including an updated critical areas ordinance. On a planning level the adopted regulatory scheme has been identified as sufficient to protect and conserve plants and animals. Site specific impacts will be reviewed and mitigated at the time of development based upon adopted regulations within the Spokane Valley at that time. 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? The proposed amendment anticipated not to have impacts on energy and natural resources. The amendment is within the scope of impacts analyzed in the Final Environmental Impact Statement for the 2017-2037 Comprehensive Plan and supporting development regulations. a. Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: Consistent with the FEIS of the 2017-2037 Comprehensive Plan, the city adopted implementing regulations to protect and conserve energy and natural resources. On a planning level, the adopted regulatory scheme has been identified as sufficient to protect and conserve energy and natural resources. Site specific impacts will be reviewed and mitigated at the time of development based upon adopted regulations within the Spokane Valley at that time. PL-22 V1.0 Page 13 of 14 Cl I p"f.H�anG' SEPA CHECKLIST S , _ Valley 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? The proposed amendment will not impact environmentally sensitive areas as none exist on the site. a. Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: Not applicable. 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? The proposed amendment will not affect any shorelines as none are near or on the site. a. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: Not applicable. 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? The proposed amendment may increase demand on transportation and public services if the site is redeveloped or developed more intensively. The amendment is within the scope of impacts analyzed in the Final Environmental Impact Statement for the 2017-2037 Comprehensive Plan and supporting development regulations. a. Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: The Comprehensive Plan adopts a level-of-service for transportation and public services. The Final Environmental Impact Statement for the 2017-2037 Comprehensive Plan and the 6- year Transportation Improvement Program identifies the necessary projects to maintain the adopted LOS. These transportation and public service projects are implemented both by the city and state and at the project level through concurrency. 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. The proposal does not conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. Any specific issues that may arise during the development of the site will be identified and addressed based upon regulations within the Spokane Valley Municipal Code. E. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, swear under penalty of perjury that the above responses are made truthfully and to the best of my knowledge. I also understand that, should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part, the agency may withdraw any Determination of Nonsignificance that it might issue in reliance upon this check list. Date: 10/27/2021 Signature: Chaz Bates Please print or type: Proponent: City of Spokane Valley Address: 10210 East Sprague Avenue; Spokane Valley, WA 99206 PL-22 V1.0 Page 14 of 14 aY Cl I Y f.H� I].G' SEPA CHECKLIST S , _ Valley Phone: (509) 720-5000 Person completing form (if different from proponent): Name: Chaz Bates, Senior Planner, City of Spokane Valley Economic Development Division Address: 10210 E Sprague Ave Spokane Valley, WA 99206 Phone: 509-720-5337 PL-22 V1.0 Page 15 of 14 EXHIBIT 9 Notice of Virtual Public Hearing City of Spokane Valley 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Due to the restrictions on public gatherings arising from the covid-19 outbreak,and pursuant to Governor Inslee's Stay Home,Stay Healthy Proclamation(No.20-25)and Proclamation 20-28(and associated extensions),this hearing will be conducted remotely using web and telephone conference tools,as described below. HEARING DATE AND TIME: March 10,2022,beginning at 6:00 p.m. ZOOM MEETING DETAILS: Join Zoom Meeting A link to the Zoom meeting will be provided on the agenda and posted to the Planning Commission webpage: www.spokanevalley.org/planningcommission. HEARING BODY: Spokane Valley Planning Commission The Planning Commission will hold a public hearing to receive public comment on the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment requests and make a recommendation to the City Council on each of the following applications: FILE No.CPA-2022-01:A request to change the comprehensive plan designation and zoning for 1.03 acres Single Family Residential(SFR)to Multifamily Residential(MFR)for parcels 45204.1436 and 45204.1435;SE 1/4 of Section 20,Township 25 North,Range 44 East,Willamette Meridian,Spokane County,Washington FILE No.CPA-2022-02:A request to change land use designation and zoning for 0.45 acres from Single Family Residential(SFR)to Parks and Open Space(POS)for parcel: 55073.0458;SW 1/4 of Section 07,Township 25 North, Range 45 East,Willamette Meridian,Spokane County,Washington FILE No.CPA-2022-03 A request to change land use designation and zoning for 17.64 acres from Single Family Residential(SFR)to Parks and Open Space(POS)for parcels:44041.0104;44041.0103;44041.0102;44041.9048; 44041.9046;and 44041.9007;NE 1/4 of Section 04,Township 24 North,Range 44 East,Willamette Meridian, Spokane County,Washington FILE No.CPA-2022-04:A request to amend Figure 27—Bikeway Network to add north river loop trail. STAFF CONTACT:Chaz Bates,AICP,Senior Planner;(509)720-5337 cbates@spokanevalley.org ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: The City issued a Determination of Non-significance(DNS)on January 14, 2022 pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA)and chapter 21.20 Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC). HEARING PROCEDURES: The Planning Commission will conduct the remote hearing pursuant to the rules of procedure adopted in SVMC Title 18(Boards and Authorities). The public is encouraged to submit written comments prior to the hearing by sending the comments to Chaz Bates, 10210 E Sprague Ave,Spokane Valley,WA 99206,or email to cbates@spokanevalley.org. You may also hand deliver your comments to City Hall.All comments will need to be received by 4:00 PM on March 9,2022,for them to be prepared for submission into the record.Comments received will be entered into the record at the time of the public participation portion of the Public Hearing. All interested persons may testify at the remote public hearing via the zoom meeting address and/or phone number. Interested persons will need to sign up to speak no later than 4:00 p.m.on March 10,2022.Please visit the Planning Commission webpage(see link above)to sign up for oral public comments.This is not an opportunity for questions or discussion.Remarks will be limited to three minutes per person. Written comments and documents may only be submitted prior to the hearing. Any appeal of the Planning Commission's decision will be based on the record established before the Planning Commission,pursuant to SVMC 17.90(Appeals). The Planning Commission will forward a recommendation on the request to the Spokane Valley City Council. STAFF REPORT AND INSPECTION OF FILE: A staff report will be available for inspection seven(7)calendar days before the hearing.The staff report and application file may be inspected by visiting the Comprehensive Plan webpage at www.spokanevalley.org/CP. If you have any questions,please contact Chaz Bates,Senior Planner, Economic Development Division,at cbates@spokanevalley.org. Carrie Koudelka,CMC Spokane Valley Deputy City Clerk Publish:February 11,2022 and February 18,2022 EXHIBIT 10 � STT T, pn air trAir 4't 1889 14 STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY 4601 N Monroe Street • Spokane, Washington 99205-1295 • (509)329-3400 January 27, 2022 Chaz Bates, AICP Senior Planner City of Spokane Valley 10210 East Sprague Avenue Spokane Valley, WA 99206 Re: 2022 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment File: CPA-2022-01, 02, 03, and 04 Dear Chaz Bates: Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the Determination of Nonsignificance regarding the 2022 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment (Proponent: City of Spokane Valley and Land Use Solutions). After reviewing the documents, the Department of Ecology (Ecology) submits the following comments: Water Quality Program-Shannon Adams (509) 329-3610 The four SEPA Checklists for the four Comprehensive Plan Amendments appear to be "non-project actions" related to zone changes. Please keep in mind that future soil disturbances at the individual sites may require separate SEPA review. If any of these future projects disturb over one acre of soil and discharge off site, they may also require a Construction Stormwater General Permit. For more information in obtaining a Construction Stormwater General Permit, or for other technical assistance, please contact Shannon Adams at (509) 329-3610 or via email at Shannon.Adams@ecy.wa.gov. State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA)-Cindy Anderson (509) 329-3442 Ecology bases comments upon information submitted for review. As such, comments made do not constitute an exhaustive list of the various authorizations you may need to obtain, nor legal requirements you may need to fulfill in order to carry out the proposed action. Applicants should remain in touch with their Local Responsible Officials or Planners for additional guidance. For information on the SEPA Process, please contact Cindy Anderson at (509) 329-3442 or via email at Cindy.Anderson@ecy.wa.gov. Chaz Bates January 27, 2022 Page 2 To receive more guidance on or to respond to the comments made by Ecology, please contact the appropriate staff listed above at the phone number or email provided. Department of Ecology Eastern Regional Office (Ecology File: 202200232) cc: Dwight Hume, Land Use Solutions EXHIBIT 11 Public Comments (Inserted as received) COMMUNITY& PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT �� BUILDING&PLANNING DIVISION Sperrsokane STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION v CPA-2022-04 STAFF REPORT DATE: February 16, 2022 HEARING DATE AND LOCATION: March 3,2022,beginning at 6:00 p.m.,remotely via Zoom. Project Number: CPA-2022-04 Application Description: A request to amend Figure 27—Bikeway Network to add north river loop trail. Location: Citywide Applicant: City of Spokane Valley, 10210 E Sprague, Spokane Valley,WA 99206 Owners: Various owners Date of Application: November 1,2021 Staff Contact: Chaz Bates, Senior Planner, 10210 E Sprague Avenue, Spokane Valley, WA 99206 APPROVAL CRITERIA: Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan, Title 17 Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) General Provisions, Title 19 SVMC Zoning Regulations, and Title 21 SVMC Environmental Controls. ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit 1: Proposed Amendment Exhibit 5: Notice of Public Hearing Exhibit 2: Existing Figure 27 Exhibit 6: Agency Comments Exhibit 3: Environmental Determination Exhibit 7: Public Comments Exhibit 4: SEPA Checklist A. BACKGROUND INFORMATION The proposed amendment is a non-site specific map amendment adding a proposed shared use path to Figure 27-Map of Existing and Recommended Bicycle Facilies of the Comprehensive Plan.The Park and Recreation Master Plan adoted in 2019 identified a potential trail along the north bank of the Spokane River from Plante's Ferry Park to a potential new park generally between Flora to Barker Roads. In 2021, the City acquired about 46 acres between Flora and Barker Roads on the north bank of the Spokane River. This proposed amendment formerly adopts a shared use path along the north bank of the Spokane River. The amendment will bring consistency to adopted plans as well as position the City for grant opportunities. PROPERTY INFORMATION Size and Characteristics: The trail would run along the north bank of the Spokane River from Flora to Plante's Ferry approximately four linear miles. Comprehensive Plan: Parks and Open Space (POS) and Industrial (I) Zoning: Parks and Open Space (P/OS) and Industrial (I) Page 1 of 6 Staff Report CPA-2022-04 Existing Land Use: Vacant Park Land SURROUNDING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN,ZONING,AND LAND USES Comprehensive Plan: POS and I North Zoning: I Uses: Industrial,park and vacant land Comprehensive Plan: POS (across the river) South Zoning: PO/S(across the river) Uses: Spokane River and the Centennial Trail Comprehensive Plan: POS East Zoning: P/OS Uses: Newly acquired vacant park land (Flora property) Comprehensive Plan: Spokane County Urban Reserve West Zoning: Spokane County Urban Reserve Uses: Plante's Ferry Park SUMMARY AND IMPLICATIONS OF PROPOSED AMENDMENT: If adopted,the amendment will add a recommended Shared Use Path to Figure 27 of the Comprehensive Plan. The amendment will bring consistency between the Park and Recreation Master Plan adopted in 2019 and the Comprehensive Plan. Including the trail in the Comprehensive Plan will enhance the City's grant opportunities. APPLICATION PROCESSING: Chapter 17.80 Permit Processing Procedures in the SVMC. The following summarizes key application procedures for the proposal. Application Submitted: November 1,2021 SEPA Determination of Non-Significance Issue date January 14,2022 End of Appeal Period for DNS: January 28,2022 Date of Mailed Notice of Public Hearing February 18,2022 Date of Published Notice of Public Hearing: February 11 and 18,2022 B. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO SEPA 1. Findings: Pursuant to Title 21 (Environmental Controls) SVMC, the lead agency has determined that the proposal does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). The City issued a Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) for the proposal on January 14, 2022. The determination was made after review of a completed environmental checklist, the application, Titles 19, 21, and 22 of the SVMC, a site assessment, public and agency comments, the Comprehensive Plan and associated Environmental Impact Statement. 2. Conclusion(s): The procedural requirements of the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) and Title 21 SVMC have been fulfilled. Page 2 of 6 Staff Report CPA-2022-04 C. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT AND REZONE i. The City may approve Comprehensive Plan amendments and area-wide zone map amendments if it finds that compliance with the approval criteria in SVMC 17.80.140(H). (1) The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to the public health, safety, welfare,and protection of the environment; Analysis: The proposed amendment amends Figure 27 — Existing and Recommended Bicycle Facilities. Figure 27 identifies planned shared use paths. In 2019 the City updated the Park and Recreation Master Plan, which identified a potential New Park Area 6 for a new community park on the north bank of the Spokane River between Flora and Barker Road, as well as a potential trail running from Plante's Ferry to the new park. In 2021, the City acquired the north bank property for a new park. This proposed amendment formally adopts the proposed north river loop trail into the Comprehensive Plan as contemplated in the Park and Recreation Master Plan. The public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment are furthered by ensuring the Comprehensive Plan is reflective of regional policy and current with other plans. (2) The proposed amendment is consistent with the requirements of Chapter 36.70A RCW and with the portion of the City's adopted Plan not affected by the amendment; Analysis: The proposed amendment is consistent with the requirements of Chapter 36.70A RCW and with the portion of the City's adopted Plan not affected by the amendment. The Growth Management Act (GMA) adopts fourteen goals to guide the development of local comprehensive plans and development regulations. The proposal is consistent with the GMA goals to enhance recreational opportunities and develop parks and recreation facilities. Additionally, the GMA requires a Parks and Recreation element to be a part of the adopted comprehensive plan. The City's Comprehensive Plan adopts the Parks Plan by reference. The proposed amendment will not have unanticipated impacts on other areas of the Comprehensive Plan. (3) The proposed amendment responds to a substantial change in conditions beyond the property owner's control applicable to the area within which the subject property lies; Analysis: The proposed amendment does not respond to a substantial change in conditions beyond the property owner's control. (4) The proposed amendment corrects an obvious mapping error; or Analysis: The proposed amendment is not in response to an obvious mapping error. However, with the adoption of the Parks and Recreation Master Plan in 2019 and the property acquisition of the Flora property in 2021, the proposed amendment will add the north river loop trail as discussed in the Park Plan and community engagement efforts. (5) The proposed amendment addresses an identified deficiency in the Comprehensive Plan. Analysis: The proposed amendment will address a documented deficiency of park land in the Comprehensive Plan. Page 3 of 6 Staff Report CPA-2022-04 ii. The City must also consider the following factors prior to approving Comprehensive Plan amendments: (6) The effect upon the physical environment; Analysis: The proposal is a graphic change only to Figure 27. It does not directly impact the physical environment. (7) The effect on open space, streams,rivers, and lakes; Analysis: The amendment is not site specific as the physical location of the trail has not been formally identified and the change would not result in effects to the natural environment. The City's critical areas ordinance and shoreline master program will ensure that adequate protection of the critical areas and adjacent shorelands are addressed at the time offuture development. There are no known surface water quality or quantity issues. (8) The compatibility with and impact on adjacent land uses and surrounding neighborhoods; Analysis: The proposed amendment is compatible with the surrounding land uses. Generally, the potential location of the trail is within park designated property. (9) The adequacy of and impact on community facilities including utilities, roads, public transportation,parks,recreation, and schools; Analysis: This is a non-site specific amendment. While the exact location of the potential trail has not been identified, the availability of sewer and water vary, certain potential trailheads may have public services.It is expected that the trail should it be developed would function in a similar fashion as the Centennial Trail, with areas remote and lacking services and others accessible with public services available. (10) The benefit to the neighborhood, City, and region; Analysis: The proposed amendment will provide benefits to the neighborhood and City by providing an opportunity to provide access to the Spokane River and recreational opportunities along on the northside of the river. (11) The quantity and location of land planned for the proposed land use type and density and the demand for such land; Analysis: The City has not adopted a Level-of-Service(LOS)ratio for trails; however, the 2019 Park and Recreation Master Plan identifies that the City will take advantage of recreational opportunities as they arise, and the Comprehensive Plan identifies access to the Spokane River as an opportunity. This location along the north bank of the Spokane River offers a unique chance to take advantage of this opportunity. (12) The current and projected population density in the area; and Analysis: The proposed change would have minimal impact on projected population density. (13) The effect upon other aspects of the Comprehensive Plan. Analysis: The proposal will not have an impact on other aspects of the Comprehensive Plan.In addition to meeting the goals in the Parks and Recreation Master Plan Page 4 of 6 Staff Report CPA-2022-04 the proposed amendment addresses the following goals,policies, and strategy of the Comprehensive Plan: LU-G2 Provide for land uses that are essential to Spokane Valley residents, employees, and visitors. LU-P18 Enable public open spaces. P-Gl Develop, grow, and maintain a diverse and accessible park, recreation, trail, and open space system that enhances community character. P-P5 Design parks and community facilities to provide easy access for pedestrians, bicycles, autos, and public transit. P-P8 Plan for access to parks, trails, and other open spaces in all neighborhoods. Strategy:Evaluate the feasibility of developing a public park along the Spokane River. Conclusion(s): For the reasons outlined above the proposed amendment is consistent with SVMC 17.80.140(H). D. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO PUBLIC COMMENTS 1. Findings: Staff has received no public comments to date. Comments received following the date of this staff report will be provided to the Planning Commission at the March 10,2022 meeting. 2. Conclusion(s): Notice of Public Hearing (NOPH) was published on February 11 and 18, 2022. Since the amendment is not site specific,no posting or direct mailing was done for the public hearing. E. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO AGENCY COMMENTS 1. Findings: Staff has not received any agency comments of significance to date. Agency Received Comments Comments Dated City of Spokane Valley Senior Traffic Engineer City of Spokane Valley Development Engineering City of Spokane Valley Building& Planning City of Spokane Valley Parks&Recreation Spokane Valley Fire Department City of Millwood City of Liberty Lake City of Spokane City of Spokane Valley Police Department Spokane County,Building and Planning Spokane County,Environmental Services Spokane County, Clean Air Agency Spokane County,Fire District No. 1 Spokane County,Fire District No. 8 Spokane County Regional Health District Page 5 of 6 Staff Report CPA-2022-04 Spokane Regional Clean Air Agency Spokane Aquifer Joint Board Spokane Transit Authority(STA) Spokane Regional Transportation Council(SRTC) Washington State Dept of Commerce Washington State Dept of Ecology(Olympia) Washington State Dept of Ecology(Spokane) Washington State Dept of Fish& Wildlife Washington State Dept of Natural Resources Washington State Dept of Transportation Washington State Parks&Recreation Commission WA Archaeological&Historic Preservation Avista Utilities Inland Power& Light Modern Electric Water Company Central Valley School District#356 East Valley School District#361 West Valley School District#363 Century Link Comcast Model Irrigation District#18 Consolidated Irrigation District#19 East Spokane Water District#1 Vera Water& Power Spokane County Water District#3 Spokane Tribe of Indians 2. Conclusion(s): No concerns are noted. F. CONCLUSION: For the reasons set forth in Section C, the proposed amendment to amend the Comprehensive Plan by adding a proposed Shared Use Path to Figure 27- Map of Existing and Recommended Bicycle Facilities complies with the requirements of the SVMC 17.80.140(H)and the Comprehensive Plan. Page 6 of 6 EXHIBIT 1 ? Figure 27 Map of Exisiting and �° Spokane County %d Spokane County Recommended Bicyle Facilities i f f'% �; �' % '(//,,1 CDProposed Amendment E V IIeY Springs Rd °�'1i,, /i - E Wellesley Ave_Ave __ E Wellesley Camp Sekani - r wetpr" Plante's Ferry M tl '� : Proposed Shared Use Path Park 'euP I ,' E Upriver Dr I-_a,Park Z+ o. _ ' } 1 Existing&Proposed t E Et ! Y Bikeway Network z co: Municipal Boundaries 1. z. EE idA Euclid Ave Spokane Valley Frederick"Ave pill mwood Mdlwo.. Ej Wes' zl a r re ( G ( `-�'\ Spokane Valley Urban Growth Area U A .. Felts Field Mirabeau ��� Parks,Kecreation,C.Upen Space E MoniggmDr Point Park — 3 E ontg�m_yAv m. Bikeway Elements E ansfield eve . i` ' t diana'e • —Existing Bike Lane =w, LL i t, Ilivan Existing Shared Use Path z Kj Valley r•.rk —Bike FriendlyRoute Spokan-. '..Kane EMission Ave Qom+ EMlssmn Ave EMIs: ii a f pIll.r �_�R. Existing Ped/Bike Bridge Z Liberty L.n i 1 = ct �� A ---•Proposed Bike Lane c 1 1 a 1 o p z Et t.Ave E e�aaway Ave E1 1 1 y way Ave _ ' EBroadw ...1 Proposed Ped/Bike Bridge 1 _ .. eco�mw VI. i -b k = z i i M, In= �' r' ...•Proposed Shared Use Path ... 1 i' "we /:,ae �. t. _ _�_a[�Y kts4a I � Y +� �: EPPP`ew !://://, ��0Ozz -1 � w �___ z+ 1 0 0.5 1 1.5z iE 1 _�_ _ ra ue Avem aruu la.uu - _� 1 _—�'_g___4 Miles 17 m E3rd Ave 1 1 1 0 • m EBth Ave a m c E£th Ave 'I _- ��1 ¢T `____�_�__ ____ N Dishman Hills o } ---_�•. __ —.------- El �" 'ter ✓! 1-� / f Natural Area r m Y//, 5 iiii L I '` T i E lath Ave `j Saltesg Uplan, , 1 i /i=.,/i /�.li•� Conservation Ai 31 w Cik w' co a COI, N E'29thAve I Eaz�a Ave E,32ndAvej co 1 Dishman Hills °. j Conservation Area z ° E 37th Ave -.'4,p0. Spokane County Spokane County . 'm i E 44th Ave 2 )s Iller Creek Morrow Park Conservation Area Natural Area EXHIBIT 2 o Appendix B Spokane County Figure 27.Bikeway Network re0e,e �/. Source Page: 5-81 o Y ----- �� Ordinance e: 19cc -004 A prings Rd / !!!i E Park ,�//: / GI m E Wellesley Ave Al E Wellesley. Effective Date: June 12,2019 Camp Sekani to s° r, r .tie • i im' �' Park w 8' �r . ZE Existing&Proposed i :2 - o a /.. „T 4 Bikeway Network m 4 � __! m Mun icipal Boundaries z Q Spokane Walley ��. . h _ I_ pn� EucliC Ave � Millwo `�_ , Felts Field Mirabeau ,,+ ��Spokane Valley Ur ban Growth Area(UGP Point Park t Plrks Recreation,&Open Space E Montg.mery Dr _ BikewayElements '•E-oomery Av= 1111 eesfield eve �,, 1: U I M —Existing Bike Lane J vu Ilivan Existing Shared Use Path p Ave Park e n:.mnAve -Bike Friendly Route 'Lz IV ExiSting Ped/Bike Bridge mce 1111IItWIil411V46114111101%Ill� ti _.Proposed Bike/Bik e L aWldo Ave ee,oaan,e Ave e .u. € Mryv;q; ■��i Proposed Ped/f3ikP Bridge u: I 11111111111 i= momaiii;Z!FT� � -,Proposed Shared Use Path i. # II ■■� E Z.. :ia.uenv= �� 0 0.5 1 1,5 ®� M� ,/ inMlles N. Dishman Hills II 311031 �.. ii t Natural Area a nn'01 3, 1111 II ��■ ` �., Spokane g v ► k �■M�dFii Uplver Valley 4.44,4,..? A . a - d t k 1 l rodifff LAM iIiIV4Or Dishman Hills I / _ Conservation Aiea J 37th Ave - ' F /411 ---/-77;„. J //�I a Spokane County .p,sy�• /�/1/7-IA4f r Ille 44 h Ave ' , I Product of the City of Spokane Valley,Community and Public Works Department .. Notice.The information shown on this map is compiled from various sources.The City makes Md7rtYWCafk no claims or guarantees about the accuracy or currency of this map and expressly disclaims It Creek -7� liability for errors and omissions in its contents.To confirm accuracy contact the City of Conservation Area Natural Area//4 Spokane Valley,Community Development Department,Division of Planning,(509)720-5000. EXHIBIT 3 COMMUNITY& PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Spokane DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE 10210 East Sprague Avenue• Spokane Valley WA 99206 galley 509.720.5000 • Fax: 509.720.5075 •planning@spokanevalley.org PROJECT:Annual amendments to the Comprehensive Plan for 2022: File Number Description Location Applicant/Owner CPA-2022-01 A request to change the Parcels 45204.1436 and SHFI comprehensive plan designation and 45204.1435; SE'/ of Section 20, PROPERTIES, zoning for 1.03 acres Single Family Township 25 North,Range 44 East, LLC/Land Use Residential(SFR)to Multifamily Willamette Meridian,Spokane Solutions and Residential(MFR). County, Washington Entitlement CPA-2022-02 A request to change land use Parcel: 55073.0458; SW '/ of Spokane Valley/ designation and zoning for 0.45 Section 07,Township 25 North, Spokane Valley acres from Single Family Residential Range 45 East, Willamette to Parks and Open Space. Meridian, Spokane County, Washington CPA-2022-03 A request to change land use Parcels:44041.0104;44041.0103; Spokane Valley/ designation and zoning for 17.64 acres 44041.0102;44041.9048; Spokane Valley from Single Family Residential to 44041.9046; and 44041.9007;NE'/ Parks and Open Space. of Section 04,Township 24 North, Range 44 East, Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washington CPA-2022-04 A request to amend Figure 27— Citywide; Spokane Valley Spokane Valley/ Bikeway Network to add north river Not applicable loop trail. LEAD AGENCY: City of Spokane Valley. DETERMINATION: Determination of Non-Significance is issued under Washington Administrative Code(WAC) 197- 11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date issued. Comments must be received by 5:00 p.m.on January 28,2022. Pursuant to Title 21, Environmental Controls of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC), the lead agency has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement is not required under Revised Code of Washington 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. STAFF CONTACT: Chaz Bates, AICP, Senior Planner, City of Spokane Valley, 10210 East Sprague Avenue, Spokane Valley, WA 99206, PH: (509) 720-5337; cbates rr spokanevallev_.org RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: Mike Basinger, AICP, Economic Development Manager, City of Spokane Valley, 10210 East Sprague Avenue, Spokane Valley, WA 99206, PH: (509) 720-5333, mbasin2er a,spokanevallev.or, DATE ISSUED: January 14, 2022 SIGNATURE:_ A,j APPEAL: An appeal of this determination shall be submitted to the Community&Pu c Works Department within fourteen (14)calendar days after the date issued. The appeal must be written and specific factual objections made to the City's threshold determination. Appeals shall be conducted in conformance with SVMC 17.90 Appeals,and any required fees pursuant to the City's adopted Fee Schedule shall be paid at the time of appeal submittal. Pursuant to WAC 197-11- 680, appeals shall be limited to a review of a final threshold determination. City of Spokane Valley Determination of Non-Significance(DNS) Page 1 of 1 File Nos.CPA-2022-01;CPA-2022-02;CPA-2022-03;CPA-2022-04 EXHIBIT 4 SEPA CHECKLIST 1 SVMC 21.20 . Millet' 10210 E Sprague Avenue • Spokane Valley WA 99206 Phone: (509)720-5240 •Fax: (509)720-5075 •pennitcenterJ)spokanevalley.org STAFF USE ONLY Date Submitted: Received by: Fee: Not Applicable_ PLUS #: File#: PART I - REQUIRED MATERIAL **THE APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF THE REQUIRED MATERIALS ARE NOT PROVIDED** ❑ Completed SEPA Checklist ❑ Application Fee ❑ Reduced Site Plan of proposal in 81/2" by 11" or 11" by 17" size ❑ Trip Distribution and Generation Letter, if requested by Development Engineering. PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions.An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly,with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or"does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NON-PROJECT PROPOSALS: Complete this checklist for non-project proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NON-PROJECT ACTIONS(Part D). PL-22 V1.0 Page 1 of 14 S``"� `-- SEPA CHECKLIST A ne Valley For non-project actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: CPA-2022-0004 An amendment to the Figure 27 Map of Existing and Recommended Bicycle Facilities. 2. Name of applicant: City of Spokane Valley 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Chaz Bates, Senior Planner, Economic Development Division, Spokane Valley,WA 99206 4. Date checklist prepared: November 1, 2021 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Spokane Valley 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Anticipated adoption June 2022. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal?Yes. If yes, explain. The City is currently seeking funding for the development of the North Loop Trail. Development is planned only and future development will require a separate SEPA process. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. An Environmental Impact Statement(EIS)was completed for the City's Comprehensive Plan. The document is titled 2017-2037 Comprehensive Plan Final Environmental Impact Statement(FEIS)and supporting Development Regulations. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? None If yes, explain. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Approval by City Council 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal.You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) The amendment will add a proposed shared use path to the north bank of the Spokane River from the eastern portion of the recently acquired Flora Park property to approximately Plante's Ferry. The exact details and layout of the route is conceptual. PL-22 V1.0 Page 2 of 14 S``"� `-- SEPA CHECKLIST A ne Valley 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The proposal is a linear pathway along the north bank of the Spokane River running approximately from Flora Road to Plante's Ferry Park. The project is only conceptually identified at this time.Actual development will be reviewed under a separate SEPA process. 13. Does the proposed action lie within the Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA)? Yes. The general Sewer Service Area? Yes. Priority Sewer Service Area? No. (See: Spokane County's ASA Overlay zone Atlas for boundaries). 14. The following questions supplement Part A. a. Critical Aquifer Recharge Area (CARA) /Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA). 1. Describe any systems, other than those designed for the disposal of sanitary waste, installed for the purpose of discharging fluids below the ground surface (includes systems such as those for the disposal of Stormwater or drainage from floor drains). Describe the type of system, the amount of material to be disposed of through the system and the types of material likely to be disposed of (including materials which may enter the system inadvertently through spills or as a result of firefighting activities). This is a non-project action changing Figure 27 of the Comprehensive Plan. Future development would be analyzed under separate SEPA process. 2. Will any chemicals (especially organic solvents or petroleum fuels) be stored in aboveground or underground storage tanks? If so, what types and quantities of material will be stored? This is a non-project action changing Figure 27 of the Comprehensive Plan. Future development would be analyzed under separate SEPA process. 3. What protective measures will be taken to insure that leaks or spills of any chemicals stored or used on site will not be allowed to percolate to groundwater? This includes measures to keep chemicals out of disposal systems. This is a non-project action changing Figure 27 of the Comprehensive Plan. Future development would be analyzed under separate SEPA process. 4. Will any chemicals be stored, handled or used on the site in a location where a spill or leak will drain to surface or groundwater or to a Stormwater disposal system discharging to surface or groundwater? This is a non-project action changing Figure 27 of the Comprehensive Plan. Future development would be analyzed under separate SEPA process. b. Stormwater PL-22 V1.0 Page 3 of 14 S``"� `-- SEPA CHECKLIST A ne Valley 1. What are the depths on the site to groundwater and to bedrock (if known)? Unknown. 2. Will stormwater be discharged into the ground? If so, describe any potential impacts. This is a non-project action changing Figure 27 of the Comprehensive Plan and does not evaluate a specific future use. Any future changes will be reviewed under existing stormwater regulations. B. ENVIRONMENTALELEMENTS EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY 1 ) Earth a.General description of the site(check one): flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other Future development would be analyzed under separate SEPA process. b.What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? unknown. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. This is a non-project action changing Figure 27 of the Comprehensive Plan. Any future changes will be reviewed under a separate SEPA process. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? No. If so, describe. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Also indicate source of fill. Not applicable. c. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? Not applicable. If so, generally describe. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Not applicable. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Not applicable PL-22 V1.0 Page 4 of 14 S``"� `-- SEPA CHECKLIST A ne Valley 2) Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, EVALUATION FOR automobile,odors, industrial wood smoke)during construction and when the AGENCY USE ONLY project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Not applicable. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that mayaffect your proposal? No. If so, generally describe.. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Not applicable. 3) Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. Yes. The Spokane River is to the south. The Spokane River is a shoreline of the state. 2) Will the project require any work over, in,or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? Not applicable. If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Future development of the site will require review for potential impacts to the shoreline. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. Not applicable. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No. PL-22 V1.0 Page 5 of 14 S``"� `-- SEPA CHECKLIST A ne Valley 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. Unknown. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? No. If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. Not applicable. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. Not applicable. c. Water runoff(including stormwater): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. This is a non-project action changing the Figure 27 of the Comprehensive Plan and does not evaluate a specific future use. Any future changes will be reviewed under stormwater regulations in place at time of development. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? Not applicable. If so, generally describe. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: The proposal is a non-project action and does not have a direct effect on the surface, ground or runoff water. PL-22 V1.0 Page 6 of 14 S``"� `-- SEPA CHECKLIST A ne Valley EVALUATION FOR 4) Plants AGENCY USE ONLY a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: ❑ deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other ❑shrubs ❑ grass ❑ pasture ❑ crop or grain ❑ wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other ❑ water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other ❑ other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? None proposed. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: The proposal is a non-project action development of any future development will be analyzed under a separate SEPA. The city has adopted development standards to preserve and enhance vegetation. 5) Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site ❑ birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, ❑ other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, ❑ other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known. c. Is the site part of a migration route? Not applicable. If so, explain. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: The proposal is a non-project action. Future development of the site will be analyzed under a separate SEPA. The city has adopted development standards to preserve and enhance fauna. PL-22 V1.0 Page 7 of 14 S``"� `-- SEPA CHECKLIST A ne Valley EVALUATION FOR 6). Energy and natural resources AGENCY USE ONLY a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Not applicable. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. Not applicable. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Not applicable. 7) Environmental health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe: The proposal is a non- project action changing Figure 27 of the Comprehensive Plan, there are no known environmental health hazards that could occur as a result of this proposal. The development of the park will be analyzed under a separate SEPA. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Not applicable. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: Not applicable. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? The conceptual route runs adjacent to a variety of land uses including industrial sites, open space natural areas, and formal recreational parks it's unlikely these noises will affect trail use. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Not applicable. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Not applicable. PL-22 V1.0 Page 8 of 14 S``"� `-- SEPA CHECKLIST A ne Valley EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY 8). Land and shoreline use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The conceptual route has a variety of owners, generally the area is used informally as a trail, it is unimproved. A variety of uses including industrial, natural spaces, and formal park spaces are adjacent to the conceptual location. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. Not known. c. Describe any structures on the site. There are no structures on the site. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Various, though expected the majority to be Parks Recreation and Open Space. f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Various, though expected the majority to be Parks Recreation and Open Space. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Urban Conservancy and Urban Conservancy High Quality. If the project occurs with Shoreline Jurisdiction h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. The proposal is a non-project action changing Figure 27 of the Comprehensive Plan, conceptually the trail would be within shoreline jurisdiction. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? None. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? Not applicable. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: Not applicable. I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: Not applicable. PL-22 V1.0 Page 9 of 14 S``"� `-- SEPA CHECKLIST A ne Valley EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY 9) Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Not applicable. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Not applicable. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: Not applicable. 10). Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? Not applicable. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Not applicable. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Not applicable. 11 ). Light and glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Not applicable. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? Not applicable. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? Not applicable. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Not applicable. PL-22 V1.0 Page 10 of 14 S``"� `-- SEPA CHECKLIST A ne Valley EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY 12) Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? The conceptual route of the trail is adjacent to Sullivan Park and Plante's Ferry. It would also be adjacent to the recently acquired park property by Flora Road. If the trail is completed it would offer an opportunity to create a loop route using the Centennial Trail. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any:The city's adopted comprehensive plan does not adopt a level of service for trails. The City has an adopted Park and Recreation Master Plan that identifies this potential trail as part of the area identified as New Park Area 6 in the 2019 Parks and Recreation Master Plan. 13). Historic and cultural preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. Not applicable. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: Not applicable. 14). Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The amendment to Figure 27 is conceptual, as development of the trail neared, it is expected it would function similar to the Centennial Trail with trailheads in accessible location and other areas being very remote. b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? STA route 96 currently serves the Sullivan corridor with a stop at Sullivan Park, presently no other STA route intersects with the trail. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? Not applicable. PL-22 V1.0 Page 11 of 14 S``"� `-- SEPA CHECKLIST A ne Valley d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to EVALUATION FOR existing roads or streets, not including driveways? Not applicable. If so, AGENCY USE ONLY generally describe (indicate whether public or private). e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? Not applicable. If so, generally describe. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? Not applicable. If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: The city's adopted comprehensive plan adopts a level of service for transportation services. 15) Public services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No. The city's adopted comprehensive plan adopts a level of service for public services. Future development will be analyzed under a separate SEPA for impacts to those services. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. Not applicable. 16) Utilities a. Check utilities currently available at the site: ❑ electricity, ❑ natural gas, ❑water, ❑ refuse service, ❑ telephone, ❑ sanitary sewer, ❑ septic system, ❑ other- describe. While the trail is conceptual only, various locations of would have access to a variety of utilities including water, sewer, refuse service, and electricity. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Not applicable. C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: Chaz Bates Date Submitted: 10/28/2021 PL-22 V1.0 Page 12 of 14 S``"� `-- SEPA CHECKLIST A ne Valley D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NON-PROJECT ACTIONS (Do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? The proposed amendment is not likely to increase emissions to air, production of noise, and discharge to water. The amendment is within the scope of impacts analyzed in the Final Environmental Impact Statement for the 2017-2037 Comprehensive Plan and supporting development regulations. a. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: Consistent with the FEIS of the 2017-2037 Comprehensive Plan, the city adopted implementing regulations while mitigating impacts to the natural environment including an updated critical areas ordinance. On a planning level the adopted regulatory scheme has been identified as sufficient to avoid and reduce impacts to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise. Site specific impacts will be reviewed and mitigated at the time of development based upon adopted regulations within the Spokane Valley. 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? The proposed amendment anticipated not to have impacts on plants and animals. The amendment is within the scope of impacts analyzed in the Final Environmental Impact Statement for the 2017-2037 Comprehensive Plan and supporting development regulations. a. Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: Consistent with the FEIS of the 2017-2037 Comprehensive Plan, the city adopted implementing regulations while mitigating impacts to the natural environment including an updated critical areas ordinance. On a planning level the adopted regulatory scheme has been identified as sufficient to protect and conserve plants and animals. Site specific impacts will be reviewed and mitigated at the time of development based upon adopted regulations within the Spokane Valley at that time. 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? The proposed amendment anticipated not to have impacts on energy and natural resources. The amendment is within the scope of impacts analyzed in the Final Environmental Impact Statement for the 2017-2037 Comprehensive Plan and supporting development regulations. a. Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: Consistent with the FEIS of the 2017-2037 Comprehensive Plan, the city adopted implementing regulations to protect and conserve energy and natural resources. On a planning level, the adopted regulatory scheme has been identified as sufficient to protect and conserve energy and natural resources. Site specific impacts will be reviewed and mitigated at the time of development based upon adopted regulations within the Spokane Valley at that time. PL-22 V1.0 Page 13 of 14 S``"� `-- SEPA CHECKLIST A Valley ne 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands?While the proposed amendment sets the stage for future development, it does not impact environmentally sensitive areas. Development of the trail or segments of the trail will require their own separate SEPA process. a. Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: Consistent with the FEIS of the 2017-2037 Comprehensive Plan and the city adopted implementing regulations while mitigating impacts to environmentally sensitive areas including a critical areas ordinance and shoreline master program. On a planning level the adopted regulatory scheme has been identified as sufficient to protect and conserve and protect environmentally sensitive areas. Site specific impacts will be reviewed and mitigated at the time of development based upon adopted regulations within the Spokane Valley at that time. 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? The proposed amendment will not affect any shorelines; however, future development will require their own separate SEPA process. a. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: Consistent with the FEIS of the 2017-2037 Comprehensive Plan and the city's adopted implementing regulations including a shoreline master program, site specific impacts will be reviewed and mitigated at the time of development based upon adopted regulations within the Spokane Valley at that time. On a planning level the adopted regulatory scheme has been identified as sufficient to protect and shoreline areas. 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? The proposed amendment may increase demand on transportation and public services as the site is redeveloped or developed. The amendment is within the scope of impacts analyzed in the Final Environmental Impact Statement for the 2017-2037 Comprehensive Plan and supporting development regulations. a. Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: The Comprehensive Plan adopts a level-of-service for transportation and public services. The Final Environmental Impact Statement for the 2017-2037 Comprehensive Plan and the 6- year Transportation Improvement Program identifies the necessary projects to maintain the adopted LOS. These transportation and public service projects are implemented both by the city and state and at the project level through concurrency. 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. The proposal does not conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. Any specific issues that may arise during the development of the site will be identified and addressed based upon regulations within the Spokane Valley Municipal Code. E. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, swear under penalty of perjury that the above responses are made truthfully and to the best of my knowledge. I also understand that, should there be any willful misrepresentation or PL-22 V1.0 Page 14 of 14 S``"� `-- SEPA CHECKLIST A Valley ne willful lack of full disclosure on my part, the agency may withdraw any Determination of Nonsignificance that it might issue in reliance upon this check list. Date: 10/28/2021 Signature: Chaz Bates Please print or type: Proponent: City of Spokane Valley Address: 10210 East Sprague Avenue; Spokane Valley, WA 99206 Phone: (509) 720-5000 Person completing form (if different from proponent): Name: Chaz Bates, Senior Planner, City of Spokane Valley Economic Development Division Address: 10210 E Sprague Ave Spokane Valley, WA 99206 Phone: 509-720-5337 PL-22 V1.0 Page 15 of 14 EXHIBIT 5 Notice of Virtual Public Hearing City of Spokane Valley 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Due to the restrictions on public gatherings arising from the covid-19 outbreak,and pursuant to Governor Inslee's Stay Home,Stay Healthy Proclamation(No.20-25)and Proclamation 20-28(and associated extensions),this hearing will be conducted remotely using web and telephone conference tools,as described below. HEARING DATE AND TIME: March 10,2022,beginning at 6:00 p.m. ZOOM MEETING DETAILS: Join Zoom Meeting A link to the Zoom meeting will be provided on the agenda and posted to the Planning Commission webpage: www.spokanevalley.org/planningcommission. HEARING BODY: Spokane Valley Planning Commission The Planning Commission will hold a public hearing to receive public comment on the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment requests and make a recommendation to the City Council on each of the following applications: FILE No.CPA-2022-01:A request to change the comprehensive plan designation and zoning for 1.03 acres Single Family Residential(SFR)to Multifamily Residential(MFR)for parcels 45204.1436 and 45204.1435;SE 1/4 of Section 20,Township 25 North,Range 44 East,Willamette Meridian,Spokane County,Washington FILE No.CPA-2022-02:A request to change land use designation and zoning for 0.45 acres from Single Family Residential(SFR)to Parks and Open Space(POS)for parcel: 55073.0458;SW 1/4 of Section 07,Township 25 North, Range 45 East,Willamette Meridian,Spokane County,Washington FILE No.CPA-2022-03 A request to change land use designation and zoning for 17.64 acres from Single Family Residential(SFR)to Parks and Open Space(POS)for parcels:44041.0104;44041.0103;44041.0102;44041.9048; 44041.9046;and 44041.9007;NE 1/4 of Section 04,Township 24 North,Range 44 East,Willamette Meridian, Spokane County,Washington FILE No.CPA-2022-04:A request to amend Figure 27—Bikeway Network to add north river loop trail. STAFF CONTACT:Chaz Bates,AICP,Senior Planner;(509)720-5337 cbates@spokanevalley.org ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: The City issued a Determination of Non-significance(DNS)on January 14, 2022 pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA)and chapter 21.20 Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC). HEARING PROCEDURES: The Planning Commission will conduct the remote hearing pursuant to the rules of procedure adopted in SVMC Title 18(Boards and Authorities). The public is encouraged to submit written comments prior to the hearing by sending the comments to Chaz Bates, 10210 E Sprague Ave,Spokane Valley,WA 99206,or email to cbates@spokanevalley.org. You may also hand deliver your comments to City Hall.All comments will need to be received by 4:00 PM on March 9,2022,for them to be prepared for submission into the record.Comments received will be entered into the record at the time of the public participation portion of the Public Hearing. All interested persons may testify at the remote public hearing via the zoom meeting address and/or phone number. Interested persons will need to sign up to speak no later than 4:00 p.m.on March 10,2022.Please visit the Planning Commission webpage(see link above)to sign up for oral public comments.This is not an opportunity for questions or discussion.Remarks will be limited to three minutes per person. Written comments and documents may only be submitted prior to the hearing. Any appeal of the Planning Commission's decision will be based on the record established before the Planning Commission,pursuant to SVMC 17.90(Appeals). The Planning Commission will forward a recommendation on the request to the Spokane Valley City Council. STAFF REPORT AND INSPECTION OF FILE: A staff report will be available for inspection seven(7)calendar days before the hearing.The staff report and application file may be inspected by visiting the Comprehensive Plan webpage at www.spokanevalley.org/CP. If you have any questions,please contact Chaz Bates,Senior Planner, Economic Development Division,at cbates@spokanevalley.org. Carrie Koudelka,CMC Spokane Valley Deputy City Clerk Publish:February 11,2022 and February 18,2022 EXHIBIT 6 � STT T, pn air trAir 4't 1889 14 STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY 4601 N Monroe Street • Spokane, Washington 99205-1295 • (509)329-3400 January 27, 2022 Chaz Bates, AICP Senior Planner City of Spokane Valley 10210 East Sprague Avenue Spokane Valley, WA 99206 Re: 2022 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment File: CPA-2022-01, 02, 03, and 04 Dear Chaz Bates: Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the Determination of Nonsignificance regarding the 2022 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment (Proponent: City of Spokane Valley and Land Use Solutions). After reviewing the documents, the Department of Ecology (Ecology) submits the following comments: Water Quality Program-Shannon Adams (509) 329-3610 The four SEPA Checklists for the four Comprehensive Plan Amendments appear to be "non-project actions" related to zone changes. Please keep in mind that future soil disturbances at the individual sites may require separate SEPA review. If any of these future projects disturb over one acre of soil and discharge off site, they may also require a Construction Stormwater General Permit. For more information in obtaining a Construction Stormwater General Permit, or for other technical assistance, please contact Shannon Adams at (509) 329-3610 or via email at Shannon.Adams@ecy.wa.gov. State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA)-Cindy Anderson (509) 329-3442 Ecology bases comments upon information submitted for review. As such, comments made do not constitute an exhaustive list of the various authorizations you may need to obtain, nor legal requirements you may need to fulfill in order to carry out the proposed action. Applicants should remain in touch with their Local Responsible Officials or Planners for additional guidance. For information on the SEPA Process, please contact Cindy Anderson at (509) 329-3442 or via email at Cindy.Anderson@ecy.wa.gov. Chaz Bates January 27, 2022 Page 2 To receive more guidance on or to respond to the comments made by Ecology, please contact the appropriate staff listed above at the phone number or email provided. Department of Ecology Eastern Regional Office (Ecology File: 202200232) cc: Dwight Hume, Land Use Solutions EXHIBIT 7 Public Comments (Inserted as received) CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: May 3, 2022 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ® admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Law Enforcement Interlocal Agreement GOVERNING LEGISLATION: City of Spokane Valley Interlocal Agreement 17-104 PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Interlocal Agreement for Law Enforcement Services as Provided by the Spokane County Sheriffs Office to the City of Spokane Valley, contract number 17-104, adopted by Council on July 25, 2017. Last amended by Council on May 4, 2021. Admin report to Council March 29, 2022. Council adopted Amended Agreement on April 12, 2022. BACKGROUND: The current interlocal agreement (ILA) with Spokane County for the provision of law enforcement services was adopted by Council in July 2017 for the 5-year period January 1, 2018, through December 31, 2022. The agreement is subject to renew at the end of 2022 for another five-year period with Council approval. This presentation provides an overview of the current agreement as well as staffing and performance metrics to assist Council in evaluating the service being delivered. This is a discussion item and no decision will be made tonight. On the final slide of the presentation, staff have provided some items for Council to consider as it evaluates current levels of service, desired service levels, and renewal of the agreement. This is not an exclusive list, but a starting point for the discussion of renewal and service level considerations. Council should consider feedback on items or other information necessary to allow Council to appropriately review the agreement and the services provided. OPTIONS: Discussion. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: N/A BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: 2022 Budget for Law Enforcement Agreement is $24,958,601 STAFF/COUNCIL CONTACT: Morgan Koudelka, Senior Administrative Analyst; Erik Lamb, Deputy City Manager; Dave Ellis, Police Chief. ATTACHMENTS: 1.) PowerPoint; 2.) Law Enforcement Interlocal Agreement — sc., 0,koaose\.... po ne F Q . 4.0•0•valley‘,0 Siiiik,ane Virae!..day 2022 LAW ENFORCEMENT 2003 7 Ill-iv A INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT City of Spokane Valley May 3, 2022 HISTORY OF AGREEMENT • 2003 - Original Contract • 2003 - SCOPE Contract • 2009 - ICMA Study: evaluation of contract services and in-house estimate. • 2010 - New Interlocal Agreement including revised cost methodology and adding Precinct Commander. • 2014 - Added 2 deputies, eliminated patrol corporals; created Power Shift and dedicated Spokane Valley Investigative Unit focused on property and drug crimes. • 2017 - Current Interlocal adopted incorporating Council Public Safety Goals. • 2021 - Homeless Services Deputy and Behavioral Health Deputy added to dedicated Spokane Valley officers. • 2022 - Final year of first five-year term for current Interlocal. Council approval required to renew agreement and start a new five-year term. 2 HISTORY OF DEDICATED OFFICERS 2003 - 101 .5 total officers (84.5 Dedicated and 17 of 34 Shared serving Spokane Valley). Support personnel such as training and public information were not counted as shared at this time. Patrol had four platoons with 11 deputies each covering six districts with a minimum of six officers per shift. 2010 - Added Precinct Commander (Now Assistant Chief) 2014 - Added 2 Patrol Officers Eliminated 6 corporals and transferred: 2 to Property Crime Detectives 1 to Patrol Deputy on Power Shift 3 to Patrol Sergeants 2022 - Added 1 Homeless Services Deputy Added 1 Behavioral Health Deputy ( grant-funded) 3 HISTORY OF SHARED OFFICERS • 2003 - Began with 34 officers (not including commissioned officers in support positions) and Spokane Valley used half (17) • 2022 - Added 2 Major Crimes Detectives 4 HISTORICAL LAW ENFORCEMENT COSTS iiiimil - - - - - - al % of Gener- i d Budget 2004 $11,690,000 44.35% 2010 $16,261,741 29.82% 2017 $20,036,884 50.02% 2022 $24,958,601 51.55% • These years represent the first full years of new contracts and the current year. • The average increase per year is 4.21% • Typical drivers of cost increases are cost-of-living adjustments, health insurance premium increases, additional positions, and increased training requirements and other unfunded state mandates. 5 Spokane Valley Police Department 91 Dedicated Commissioned Officers (89 Supervised by Police Chief) Police Chief (Undersheriff) Property and Drug Crime Investigations(SVIU) 1 Sergeant Assistant Chief 10 Detectives (Inspector) 1 Deputy Administrative Sergeant Dayshift Lieutenant Nightshift Lieutenant Precinct Front Desk Deputy (Dayshift Patrol) Day Patrol Night Patrol School Resource Officers 4 Sergeants 5 Sergeants 4 Deputies Platoon 1-11 Deputies Platoon 1-10 Deputies Platoon 2-10 Deputies Platoon 2-10 Deputies Powershift 1-4 Deputies Community Services Powershift 2-4 Deputies Deputy Traffic 1 Sergeant 1 Det/Corp K-9 Homeless Services 5 Deputies 3 Deputies Deputy (Included in platoons above) 6 SVPD DEDICATED OFFICERS WITH SUPERVISION OUTSIDE OF DEPARTMENT (2 FTE) Major Crimes Regional Sergeant BHU Supervisor 1 Domestic Behavioral Violence Health Detective Deputy -3 total grant-funded BHU deputies for the Sheriff's Office with 2 primarily working in Spokane Valley. Council added i to the dedicated list of permanently- funded positions. Spokane Valley Police Department 37 Shared Commissioned Officers + 14 Training Positions (SV Uses Approximately Half) Spokane County Sheriff Trainin: Professional Standards PIO 7FTE 14 Pool Positions (New-Hires as Needed Emergency Operations 2 Deputies 'egiona me igence roup (RIG 9) lneefive Investigations 4 Investigative Undersheriff— 1 FTE Investigative Lt.—2 FTE Major Crimes-9 FTE Sex Crimes—8 FTE Joint Terrorism Task Force— 1 Det. Safe Streets (Drug & Gang)—5 FTE DEA Deputy— 1 FTE 8 PATROL PLATOONS - MINIMUM STAFFING IS 6 DEPUTIES, ONE FOR EACH DISTRICT Original Day Platoon 1 Day Platoon 2 Night Platoon 1 Night Platoon 2 Design 11 Deputies 11 Deputies 11 Deputies 11 Deputies p Original Day Platoon 1 10 Deputies Day Platoon 2 Night Platoon 1 Night Platoon 2 Implementatio (1 On Front Desk) 11 Deputies 11 Deputies 11 Deputies 2014 Changes Day Platoon 1 Day Platoon 2 Night Platoon 1 Night Platoon 2 +2 Deputies 9 Deputies 3. Corp. to Deputy (1 On Front Desk) 10 Deputies 10 Deputies 10 Deputies i from each day and night platoon r moved to Power Power Shift 1 Power Shift 2 Shift 4 Deputies 3 Deputies 9 PATROL PLATOONS - MINIMUM STAFFING IS 6 DEPUTIES, ONE FOR EACH DISTRICT - 49TOTAL Current Structure • 3 K-9 Deputies Day Platoon 1 Day Platoon 2 Night Platoon 1 Night Platoon 2 moved to 11 Deputies 10 Deputies 10 Deputies 10 Deputies platoons. • Front Desk deputy moved Power Shift 1 Power Shift 2 out of platoon. 4 Deputies 4 Deputies io OFFICERS THAT SUPPLEMENT PATROL RESPONSE • 4 SV School Resource Officers when school is not in session • Behavioral Health Unit (3 County Teams) can pick up calls related to behavioral health crisis • 1 Homeless Services Deputy can respond to homeless related calls • 1 Community Services Deputy may respond to certain types of calls • 7 Traffic Officers (1 Sergeant, 1 Corporal, 5 Deputies) can respond to traffic collisions and reports of dangerous driving 11 PATROL PLATOON SCHEDULING - STARTING NUMBER MUST ACCOMMODATE VACATION, TRAINING, AND OTHER LEAVE Table 1. Annual Hours per Category Category Annual Hours %of Total Estimated Actual Staffing 1699.00 77.8% Vacation 189.00 8.7% Training 80.00 3.7% Holidays, Leave, Sick, Injuries 216.00 9.9% Total Annual Hours 2184 100.0% Table 2. Officers per Category Category 11 Officers 10 Officers 9 Officers Estimated Actual Staffing 8.56 7.78 7.00 Vacation 0.95 0.87 0.78 Training 0.40 0.37 0.33 Holidays, Leave,Sick, Injuries 1.09 0.99 0.89 Total Starting Platoon Numb 11.00 10.00 9.00 Table 3. Officers per Category(Rounded) Category 11 Officers 10 Officers 9 Officers Estimated Actual Staffing 8 7 6 Vacation 1 1 1 Training 1 1 1 Holidays, Leave,Sick, Injuries 1 1 1 Total Starting Platoon numb 11 10 9 12 PATROL PLATOON SCHEDULING - STARTING NUMBER MUST ACCOMMODATE VACATION, TRAINING, AND OTHER LEAVE Patrol Platoon Staffing Availability 12 - 10 - VI CC W LL IP 1 LL LL 6 - Minimum Staffing O CC W co 2 4 - 8 7 6 2 - ti 0 11 Officers 10 Officers 9 Officers PLATOON STARTING STAFFING LEVEL ■Estimated Actual Staffing •Vacation •Training •Holidays,Leave,Sick,Injuries PATROL PLATOONS - STAFFING LEVELS (YEAR- END 2021) G 1, Filled 4 ° 1 - Filled Filled Unfilled 9 9 3 C. G 9, o- Filled Filled Unfilled 9 Filled 3 9 14 WORKLOAD AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES - PATROL Workload Indicators: 2018 2019 2020 2021 4 Yr Avg. Citizen Calls for Service 45,501 48,296 46,287 51,038 47,781 a s wit Deputy 'esponse0�43 •,� Deputy-Initiated Incidents 20,709 19,116 15,156 11,133 16,529 Inc'• - R- . u' ' : D. umentation Total Deputy Involved Incidents 49,687 49,550 44,719 40,073 46,007 •.erformance Measures: 2018 2019 2020 2021 4 Yr i vg. Citizen Complaints/1,000 Incidents * 0.24 0.49 0.13 0.33 0.30 % of Complaints Sued MI 7.14% 8.33% 16.60% 29.00% 15.27% % Use of Force Within Policy 100.00% 99.50% 100% 100% 99.88% A 0:0 0:04:55:I°— Avg. Response Time Priority 2 0:17:07 0:23:24 0:20:15 . 'espons, e 'riorit i %of Incidents Deputy-Initiated 42% 39% 34% 34% 37% Average DayAight Platoon Staffing Different Metric Used 3 _____ Average Powershift Platoon Staffing Different Metric Used 1.61 1.61 15 STAFFING, WORKLOAD AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES - TRAFFIC Workload Indicators: 2018 2019 2020 2021 4 Yr Avg. Unfilled Speed Patrol Requests Worked 52 28 0 24 26 1 Investigations serious injury/fatality DUI Emphasis hours 35 99 23 94 63 ,is Hours Non Criminal Infractions 4,513 3,434 2,186 2,941 3,269 _ .--.-- =11=. .. - ts(Future) Filled — 6 - . _o - , - i - . 2018 2019 2020 2021 Reportable collisions 1,669 1,780 1,468 1,771 1,672 Non-reportable collisions W 1,096 1,099 — a 16, STAFFING, WORKLOAD AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES - K-9 Workload Indicators: 2018 2019 2020 2021 4 Yr Avg.1 Deployments 227 228 206 136 199 Alerts 9 15 68 11 26 Filled Arrests 29 32 19 25 26 3 148 94 123 STAFFING, WORKLOAD AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES - SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICERS Workload Indicators: 2018 2019 2020 2021 4 Yr Avg. Calls for Service at Schools 1,006 990 2,388 1,305 1,422 .-= (fulMr Official Student Contacts future Filled 2018 2019 2020 2021 4YrAvg. Drug Incidents per 1000 24 35 12 12 21 Use of Force Withi 18 STAFFING, WORKLOAD AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES - SV INVESTIGATIVE UNIT (SVIU ) Workload Indicators: 2018 2019 2020 2021 4 Yr Avg. Cases Investigated 900 756 2,095 2,096 1,462 Unfilled — Charges Filed g_ 684 4 Cases Reviewed 5,801 4,234 6,992 6,107 5,784 Filled $Value of Recovered Items 100,923 $243,334 $1,275,416 $ 539,891 7 _ ;�•� • a 2018 %of reviewed cases investigated 16% 18% 30% 34% 25% STAFFING, WORKLOAD AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES - BEHAVIORAL HEALTH UNIT Workload Indicators: 2018 2019 2020 2021 4 Yr Avg. Crisis Contacts 2,712 2,712 Follow Emergent Detentions 820 820 Arrests Referrals 2,027 2,027 Diversions Filled 1 once Measures: 2021 4 Yr Avg. Time Saved in Hours* 507 507 Avg. Officer Crisis Cons Per Shift 3.92 Calls for Service Diverted * 837 837 _- *S i_okane (all , 9ril, AlLoth r nacators Lora,healthUnit ---- ---- ----- 20 STAFFING- COMMUNITY SERVICES, HOMELESS SERVICES & DOMESTIC VIOLENCE STAFFING, WORKLOAD AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES - TRAINING (SHARED) Workload Indicators: 2018 2019 2020 2021 4 Yr Avg. Trainin: Sessions Attended 297 339 278 96 288 Filled Performance Measures: 2018 2019 2020 2021 4 Yr Avg. 4 %of Mandator Trainin: Com.leted 100 100 100 100 100 22 STAFFING AND WORKLOAD INDICATORS - EMERGENCY OPERATIONS (SHARED) Workload Indicators: 2018 2019 2020 2021 A Missing Persons Found 8 11 12 11 11 V1 e r Re s s 2 Body Recovery 7 6 7 1 5 Filled Vehicle In Water Calls 3 ILW 1 2 2 Evidence Searches 6 8 17 14 11 STAFFING, WORKLOAD AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES - SHARED INVESTIGATIONS Unfilled 1 Workload Indicators: 2018 2019 2020 2021 4 Yr Avg. Major Crime Cases Investigated 273 246 260 Sex Crimes Case Investigate DV Cases Reviewed 3,882 4,014 3,948 icid_ Per . u • i - u -• - • e 019 2020 2021 4 Yr Avg. Fille %of Major Crimes Solved (future) 18 %of Sex Crime Ca l ve d,(future) ® w Crimes a.ainst sersons .erca•ita (future) 24 SVPD CIVILIAN POSITIONS DEDICATED SHARED SHARED SHARED Administration Public Records Administration RIG S Asst. to the Chief (3) FTE 9 FTE Intelli enc g 4 FTE SVIU Forensics Investigations Safe Streets Tech Ass 15 FTE 4 FTE 1 FTE 1111 Fleet Trn Traffic School Fleet (�)Auto 3 FTE 3 FTEq 1 FTE Technicians III 25 CAPITAL FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT • Capital purchases that serve Spokane Valley, excluding vehicles, with a cost greater than $50,000, may be billed to City at time of purchase contingent upon prior City authorization (It has been typical that most items are purchased by County and depreciated costs are charged to the City over the useful life of the items). • County shall consult with City prior to committing to capital purchases that exceed $200,000. • Beginning in 2022, City begins paying upfront for dedicated police vehicles. Other vehicles purchased by the County but used to provide service to the City will continue to be depreciated. • Should the agreement be terminated, the City shall have the option to purchase vehicles and equipment used to provide service to the City. Dedicated vehicles purchased upfront by the City shall be transferred to the City. 26 Spokane Valley Police Service Demand Population Calls for Service 110,000 _' - _` 55,000 =� = i — \ \ \ 105,000 y 50,000 R. \ . \ 45,000c 100,000 \ \ 95 000 \ \ — \ \ \ \ 40,000 \\�\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\O\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \ \ 90,000 = 35,000 u \ Q Q Q Q Q Q Q N O \ \ Ua 85,000 �\ \ \ 30,000 80,000 \\\\ \ _\ \ ti \ \ 25,000 75,000 20,000 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 27 BUDGETED PATROL OFFICERS PER 1, 000 CITIZENS Patrol Officers Per 1,000 Citizens 0.60 - l 0.55 \ \ L \ -\ L\ P4 1 0.50 \ _ ILI_ILL ILL U 0 O 0.45 - N 0` 0 0 o O �' O o 0 O O � 0 0 V T 03 IN V :IN A 0 O O 01 lA Vri A 0.40 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 3 Deputies added in 2014. 3 K-9 Deputies Plugged in starting 2020. 28 SERVICE DEMAND OVERTIME AllE=ELCalls Per Budgeted Patrol Officer 1200 _ 1100 \ \ i i moo I I Z 900 - - - - - 800 \ ‘ = - - - '',': 700 p 600 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 3 Deputies added in 2014. 3 K-9 Deputies Plugged in starting 2020. 29 CONSIDERATIONS FOR COUNCIL • Identify additional information needed for determining whether to roll contract over to a new five-year term • Develop goals, terms and negotiated items for a second five-year term including full staffing plan. • Consider staffing needs for 2023 • Dedicated SVPD Analyst to provide data to enhance accountability and reporting? • Additional patrol officers to meet needs of growing population and increased call load? • Evaluate calls for service • Determine ways to reduce high consumers • Identify most efficient ways to respond to calls for service • Utilize technology for deterrence and proactive response 30 INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES AS PROVIDED BY THE SPOKANE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE TO THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into among Spokane County, a political subdivision of the state of Washington,having offices for the transaction of business at 1116 West Broadway Avenue, Spokane, Washington 99260, hereinafter referred to as "COUNTY," the Spokane County Sheriff, a separate elected official of Spokane County, having offices for the transaction of business at 1100 West Mallon Avenue, Spokane, Washington 99260, hereinafter referred to as "SHERIFF"and the City of Spokane Valley, a municipal corporation of the state of Washington, having offices for the transaction of business at 10210 East Sprague Avenue, Spokane Valley, Washington 99206, hereinafter referred to as "CITY,"jointly hereinafter referred to as the "Parties" and individually referred to as "Party". COUNTY, SHERIFF and CITY agree as follows. SECTION NO. 1: RECITALS AND FINDINGS 1.1 Under RCW 36.32.120(6), the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, acting on behalf of Spokane County, has the care of County property and the management of County funds and business. 1.2 Under chapter 39.34 RCW ("Interlocal Cooperation Act"), public agencies may contract with each other to perform certain functions which each may legally perform. 1.3 Under chapter 36.28 RCW, the Spokane County Sheriff is the Chief Law Enforcement Officer and Conservator of the Peace of Spokane County. 1.4 The City of Spokane Valley desires to utilize the services of the Spokane County Sheriffs Office to provide law enforcement services. 1.5 The direct and indirect costs for law enforcement services will be set forth in the Law Enforcement Cost Allocation Plan ("LECAP"), described in Section 6 and incorporated herein by this reference. 1.6 The Parties, in providing these law enforcement services, seek to make the CITY a crime- free city. SECTION NO. 2: DEFINITIONS 2.1 Agreement: "Agreement" means this Interlocal Agreement among Sheriff, City and County regarding the provision of law enforcement services. Page 1 of 24 2.2 City: "CITY"means the City of Spokane Valley. 2.3 County: "COUNTY"means Spokane County. 2.4 Dedicated CITY Officers: "Dedicated CITY Officers" means those commissioned officers (SHERIFF Deputies) listed in Exhibit "3" that are 100% dedicated to providing service to the CITY and who work under the supervision of the CITY Police Chief. 2.5 Services: "Services"means those services identified in Exhibit 1. 2.6 Sheriff: "SHERIFF" means the duly elected sheriff of Spokane County possessing those general duties set forth in chapter 36.28 RCW. 2.7 Uncontrollable Circumstances: "Uncontrollable Circumstances" means the following events: riots, wars, civil disturbances, insurrections, acts of terrorism, external fires and floods, volcanic eruptions, lightning or earthquakes at or near where the Services are performed and/or that directly affect providing of such Services. SECTION NO. 3: PURPOSE The purpose of this Agreement is to reduce to writing the Parties' understanding as to the terms and conditions under which SHERIFF will provide Services to CITY. The Services will be consistent with the City's council/manager form of management pursuant to chapter 35A.13 RCW. SECTION NO. 4: DURATION AND TERMINATION 4.1 Initial Term and Renewal. The initial term of this Agreement shall commence as of 12:01 A.M. on the date of execution, and run through midnight, December 31, 2022, for all provisions except for the cost methodology, which shall be implemented beginning on January 1, 2018. Thereafter, this Agreement shall automatically renew for five-year time frames, unless the termination process outlined herein is invoked. The Automatic renewal shall not occur unless the CITY provides notice to the COUNTY that the City Council has authorized the renewal. 4.2 Process for Termination. This Agreement may be terminated by any Party by providing written notice after December 31, 2020 to all other Parties. COUNTY shall consult with SHERIFF prior to providing written notice of termination under this subsection. SHERIFF shall consult with COUNTY prior to providing written notice of termination under this subsection. This termination shall be effective (24) twenty-four months after written notice is provided as long as such written notice is provided prior to midnight December 31, 2022. The same time intervals for terminations shall apply to future terms if the termination process is not invoked during the initial contract period. Page 2 of 24 4.3 Implementation of Termination. When notice of termination is given, SHERIFF and CITY agree to jointly prepare a Transition Plan and complete by a mutually agreed date. 4.3.1 Transition Plan. The Transition Plan shall identify and address, among other items (i) personnel issues; (ii) workload; (iii) ongoing case assignments; and (iv) the transfer of records. If the SHERIFF and CITY cannot mutually agree to the terms of the Transition Plan, either Party can request arbitration as provided in Section No. 18. SHERIFF and CITY shall equally share the cost of said arbitration. 4.3.2 Implementation of Transition Plan. Parties agree to use all best efforts to create and effectuate a mutual implementation of the Transition Plan. 4.4 Termination of the Agreement-Vehicles and Equipment. At the termination of this Agreement, CITY shall have the option to purchase, subject to agreement of SHERIFF and COUNTY, COUNTY-owned vehicles and/or equipment used to provide Services. Ownership of dedicated vehicles that have been fully paid for by CITY shall be transferred to CITY without cost if City choses to exercise this option. 4.5 Waiver of Statutory Terms. To the extent that it is applicable to law enforcement Services, the Parties hereby waive the statutory termination rights of RCW 39.34.180(3) and elect instead to follow these contractual termination procedures as the sole method of terminating this Agreement, the terms of which are detailed in this section. 4.6 Termination of the Agreement and Settle and Adjust. The Parties recognize that Costs for Services under the Agreement are calculated utilizing the LECAP. Charges for the current year are based on estimated costs and are subject to a settle and adjust reconciliation to actual costs after the year is complete. As such, in the event this Agreement is terminated as provided for in Subsection 4.2 hereinabove, the Agreement will be subject to a settle and adjust for any years that have not yet been reconciled. In the event of termination, the Parties shall follow the process set forth in Section No. 6 to determine the settle and adjust as well as the process to object to the final adjustment(s) as set forth in Subsection 6.4 set forth hereinafter. SECTION NO. 5: SERVICES 5.1 Services Provided and Service Levels. The SHERIFF shall provide those Services set forth in Exhibit "1," attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. These Services shall only be changed by mutual written agreement of Parties. 5.1.1 Dedicated CITY Officers. CITY may unilaterally adjust the number of Dedicated CITY Officers set forth in Exhibit "3" only after meaningful prior consultation between the SHERIFF and the CITY. Written notice of such an adjustment shall be provided by CITY to COUNTY and SHERIFF. Page 3 of 24 The Police Chief shall have the ability to move Dedicated CITY Officers to different service units or convert to a shared resource on a temporary basis, not to exceed 90 days, to meet current workload demands, with notification to the City Manager. Moves that exceed 90 days must be approved by the City Manager and be accompanied by a demonstrated need. A change from a dedicated resource to a shared resource shall be communicated to the County Budget Office and, if necessary, an adjustment will be made to the final LECAP to equitably distribute costs to all users of the resource and remove those costs from the CITY dedicated costs for the time period matching the move or change. CITY patrol staffing shall be maintained at a level that allows for a minimum of one patrol officer per patrol district per shift. 5.1.2 Shared Services. SHERIFF shall provide shared Services listed in Exhibit "1" to CITY. SHERIFF shall ensure that shared service units work with the Police Chief and Assistant Police Chief to provide case updates, information, and data as requested. SHERIFF shall have the ability to make permanent adjustments to the number of commissioned officers providing Services listed under shared units in Exhibit"4"after 30 days advanced notice is provided to the CITY and accompanied with a cost impact estimate and service level impact estimate. The SHERIFF'S ability to temporarily shift shared personnel to meet emerging needs shall not be limited. Any adjustments in Services under this section shall only be operative after relevant notice and impact bargaining negotiations for reductions in force are satisfied with the relevant collective bargaining units but in no event shall the delay in implementation exceed 60 days after the SHERIFF has satisfied his good faith bargaining obligations pursuant to chapter 41.46 RCW for reductions. Additions will be filled in 60 days unless staffing shortages delay implementation, in which case, SHERIFF shall provide to CITY an estimated time to fill new positions added by CITY,and will continue to provide quarterly updates until the positions are filled. Any permanent adjustments that take place under this section after the original cost estimate has been prepared shall result in the COUNTY recalculating the annual cost estimate and then adjusting the remaining monthly payments unless otherwise mutually agreed upon by the SHERIFF and City Manager. Notwithstanding the above, SHERIFF'S ability to fulfill his statutory obligation to provide law enforcement Services to COUNTY and CITY shall not be limited. 5.2 Periodic Reporting Requirements. SHERIFF shall provide to CITY quarterly reports,within 30 days from the end of each quarter,that identify statistics used to calculate CITY'S cost in the LECAP referenced in Section No. 6 below. Those statistics which are only available to COUNTY on an annual basis shall be provided annually within 30 days of the end of each calendar year unless the statistics are provided by an outside agency, in Page 4 of 24 which case they shall be provided within 15 days after they are provided to COUNTY. These reports will allow CITY to monitor service consumption and cost accrual throughout the year. 5.2.1 Performance Measures and Workload Indicators. Available data for the indicators and measures listed in Exhibit"2" shall be provided by SHERIFF to CITY on a quarterly basis subject to availability of data, unless otherwise mutually agreed upon by SHERIFF and the City Manager. The indicators and measures shall be modified jointly by the City Manager and SHERIFF as needed to provide the most accurate assessment of the Services provided to CITY. Goals for each performance measure shall be established by the City Manager and the Police Chief. SHERIFF and CITY shall work together jointly to provide the necessary support and resources to achieve established goals. Failure to meet established goals on a quarterly basis shall result in progress reports provided by the Police Chief to the City Manager. The reports shall indicate the causes of the deficiencies and provide responsive action taken or recommendations by the Police Chief to correct the deficiencies as well as progress made toward achieving the goals. The progress reports shall continue until the deficiency has been corrected. SECTION NO. 6: COST OF SERVICES 6.1 Cost Methodology. CITY costs will be determined by utilizing the LECAP. The LECAP will allocate costs through a combination of direct dedicated CITY officer costs; and shared and indirect costs allocated through mutually agreed upon allocation bases. Salary and Benefits for Dedicated CITY Officers will be segregated into separate budget units and costs will be tracked separately. The allocation bases will be reviewed by the COUNTY and CITY as needed. Any changes to the allocation bases will be made by staff of the CITY and COUNTY and mutually agreed upon by the SHERIFF, COUNTY CEO, and the City Manager. Indirect costs will be applied from the Countywide Cost Allocation Plan, the COCAP. The COCAP will be prepared in accordance with OMB U.S. Office of Management and Budget Circular 2 CFR 200. The CITY shall not be charged for costs unrelated to the provision of law enforcement Services in the current year, including but not limited to, costs for tax assessor and treasurer tax collections. CITY shall receive a credit for COCAP building charges and associated maintenance and utility costs, in recognition of CITY-owned facilities (precinct/garage). CITY shall also receive a credit for Services paid through other revenue sources and Services that have been pre-paid by CITY. Page 5 of 24 6.2 Estimated Costs. The LECAP will be used to estimate CITY cost for Services for a contract year based upon the contract year's budget. Estimated indirect costs will be calculated by applying an indirect rate derived from actual indirect costs from the most recently completed year. CITY shall have 30 days to review the estimated costs and ask questions. Should the estimate not be provided or not be finalized by the time the invoices for a new contract year are due, CITY will continue to pay at the previous year's monthly rate until the estimate is finalized. If the CITY has paid one or more months at the previous year's rates, the COUNTY will calculate the difference between the previous year's rates and the current year's monthly estimate for those months and add the difference to the first monthly payment at the current year's estimate. COUNTY shall notify CITY of any budget amendments expected to increase CITY'S law enforcement costs by more than $200,000. Estimated costs paid by CITY for specific items such as dedicated patrol salary shall not be diverted to other expenses without prior authorization by the City. CITY will work with Police Chief and Assistant Police Chief to process such requests expeditiously. This section does not diminish the SHERIFF'S state constitutional and statutory law enforcement powers pursuant to chapter 36.28 RCW, nor his ability to expediently respond to emergencies. 6.3 Settle and Adjust. The LECAP will be used to calculate the actual CITY cost for the contract year based upon the contract year's actual expenses. After calculating the CITY'S actual costs for a contract year, any overage or underage from the estimated billed amount will be applied to the next invoice. Should the contract no longer be in effect, payment by either Party will be due within 30 days of agreement of the final amount. COUNTY shall provide CITY with the actual cost calculations for the contract year in writing via the LECAP no later than September 30th of any calendar year for the preceding year's costs. CITY will have thirty (30) calendar days from its receipt of the LECAP to provide COUNTY with any written objections to the amounts set forth therein. COUNTY agrees to consider all written objections received from CITY and reply to CITY no later than fifteen (15) calendar days of receipt of CITY'S objections. In the event the Parties cannot mutually resolve any written objection(s) submitted by CITY within an additional fifteen(15) calendar day time frame, or such other time frame as the Parties may mutually agree to, the objections shall be resolved pursuant to the Dispute Resolution provisions set forth in Section No. 18. 6.4 Retroactive Salary Adjustments. The Police Chief will inform the CITY of the commencement and settlement of applicable collective bargaining agreements, as well as inform CITY of the status of any pending negotiations as to tentative agreements. Should any applicable bargaining agreement not be settled in time to include any salary adjustments granted commissioned deputies under any collective bargaining agreement in the cost estimate for a given year, and that collective bargaining agreement is settled, and the settlement contains a retroactive salary adjustment, COUNTY will bill CITY for the full Page 6 of 24 amount of CITY'S portion of the retroactive payment. CITY will be responsible for paying COUNTY within thirty(30)days of the billing date. Additionally,COUNTY may recalculate the estimated Interlocal Agreement amount employing the cost of living or wage increase(s) granted commissioned deputies under any collective bargaining agreement and adjust the remaining monthly payments. 6.5 Capital Purchases. Capital equipment deemed necessary for all commissioned officers, excluding vehicles, with a cost greater than $50,000, may be billed to CITY at the time of purchase contingent upon prior CITY authorization. CITY will be billed according to its proportionate share. COUNTY will bill CITY for this cost at the time of the purchase and payment will be due within 30 days of the billing date. As part of the settle and adjust reconciliation, COUNTY will give CITY credit for the full amount paid for capital equipment in that year. The Parties may also jointly agree to apply this language to capital purchases of any amount on a case-by-case basis. All capital items purchased by COUNTY will become the property of COUNTY. All items purchased by CITY will become the property of CITY. Capital items that have been purchased with grant funds by either CITY or COUNTY, or other funding sources, and capital items that are not utilized in providing law enforcement Services to CITY, will not be charged to CITY. All capital items that are utilized in providing law enforcement Services to CITY, and which are not immediately billed to CITY according to the terms stated in this section, and that were not purchased with other funding sources, will be incorporated as fixed assets in the (COCAP) and reimbursed through depreciation. County shall consult with CITY prior to committing to capital purchases that exceed $200,000. Typical recurring expenses such as vehicles are exempt from this requirement. Beginning in 2022, CITY will be billed for the entire cost of dedicated vehicles in the year the vehicles were purchased and received. Vehicles purchased prior to 2022 will continue to be billed through depreciation in the COCAP. Orders related to CITY dedicated vehicles and the subsequent disposition of those vehicles shall require prior written approval by CITY. Shared vehicles will typically be supplied through the equitable transfer of vehicles from dedicated units from CITY and COUNTY once the dedicated vehicles are replaced by new vehicles. In some cases, new vehicles may need to be purchased for shared units; efforts will be made to utilize existing revenue sources but if these sources are not available the COUNTY will purchase the vehicles and depreciate the CITY'S share of costs according to current allocation bases. Additionally, salvage value received through the sale of CITY dedicated vehicles will be placed into a combined CITY/COUNTY reserve to be used to replace wrecked vehicles, purchase atypical needs such as transport trailers, and purchase specialty vehicles as funds allow. Use of the CITY/COUNTY reserve funds shall require prior written approval from the SHERIFF and CITY, which shall not be unreasonably withheld. 6.6 Billing Procedure. COUNTY will bill CITY for one-twelfth of calculated estimated contract amount during the first week of each month. Regular monthly payments by CITY Page 7 of 24 will be due by the end of the month in which they are billed. Should the bill be received at a later date, the City shall have 21 days to process the payment. 6.7 Penalty. At the sole option of COUNTY, a penalty may be assessed on any late payment owed by CITY in an amount equal to lost interest earnings had the payment been timely paid and invested in the Spokane County Treasurer's Investment Pool. Any resolution of a disputed amount through use of the arbitration process identified in Section No. 18 shall include at the request of any Party, a determination of whether interest is appropriate, including the amount. SECTION NO. 7: MUNICIPAL POLICE AUTHORITY CITY shall retain all police powers and,by virtue of this Agreement, CITY confers municipal police authority on the SHERIFF. SECTION NO. 8: OFFICER ASSIGNMENT, RETENTION, DISCIPLINE AND HIRING COUNTY is acting hereunder as an independent contractor as to: 8.1 Hiring. The SHERIFF shall hire, assign, retain and discipline all employees according to applicable collective bargaining agreements, civil service rules, and state and federal laws. 8.2 Standards of Performance Governed by the SHERIFF. Control of personnel, standards of performance, discipline and all other aspects of performance shall be governed by the SHERIFF. Provided, however that only qualified, trained personnel meeting all of the requirements of applicable state laws or regulations shall be utilized in the performance of Services. 8.3 Assignment of Dedicated CITY Officers. SHERIFF or his designee and Police Chief shall work together to determine the personnel assigned to fill Dedicated CITY Officer positions. SHERIFF and CITY will work together to encourage Dedicated City Officer retention and fill open positions to provide continuity of Services. SHERIFF or his designee and the City Manager shall discuss anticipated openings due to retirements and transfers to other agencies and jointly determine how to best prepare to fill those vacancies. 8.4 Patrol Districts. Patrol districts for the CITY are established in Exhibit"5". The patrol districts will coincide within CITY limits. A patrol district is a geographical area of a size and configuration designed to minimize response times to citizen's calls for Services. Response is typically measured from the time a call is received to the time the unit arrives on the scene. If the boundary of the CITY limits change, the SHERIFF will work together with the City Manager and the Police Chief to determine if a change to the number of patrol districts is necessary. The Police Chief will also periodically evaluate the calls for Service and other impacts to response times and make recommendations to the City Manager, if necessary, Page 8 of 24 regarding changes to patrol districts. All changes to the number of patrol districts in CITY shall be authorized by the Council and SHERIFF. 8.5 Dedicated CITY Units and Officers, Mutual Aid. SHERIFF recognizes that he is providing sworn police Services dedicated to CITY. Dedicated CITY Service units, established in Exhibit "1", and the Dedicated CITY Officers, established in Exhibit "3", shall work under the supervision of the Police Chief and be located at the CITY Precinct Building except the Domestic Violence Detective who works in a shared unit under the Shared Investigative Lieutenant. CITY dedicated officers shall be provided in the number of officers shown in Exhibit"3". Service units identified as "Shared Resources" in Exhibit "4" shall be shared between the CITY and COUNTY and costs shall be allocated according to bases mutually agreed upon by staff 8.5.1 Mutual Aid. Dedicated CITY Officers shall provide mutual aid to other local law enforcement agencies, when possible, for emergency requests. Additionally, Dedicated CITY Officers and COUNTY Officers shall continue to assist each other and work together, sharing information and resources when mutually beneficial. Dedicated CITY Officers may be assigned to regional task force units and directed by the Police Chief to assist with investigations outside of the CITY limits for cases that have a regional impact and benefit the CITY as well as other local jurisdictions. This section does not diminish the SHERIFF'S State Constitutional and statutory law enforcement powers pursuant to chapter 36.28 RCW, nor his ultimate authority over all SHERIFF'S Office employees. SECTION NO. 9: CITY POLICE CHIEF AND ASSISTANT POLICE CHIEF SELECTION, REMOVAL AND DUTIES, AS WELL AS CITY MANAGER'S AND SHERIFF'S RESPONSIBILITIES THERETO 9.1 Selection of Police Chief or Assistant Police Chief. When, for any reason, there occurs a vacancy in the position of Police Chief or Assistant Police Chief, the SHERIFF shall designate three or more SHERIFF Deputies of the rank of Lieutenant or higher, or as otherwise agreed by the parties, as candidates for each of the positions of Police Chief or Assistant Police Chief. The positions of Police Chief or Assistant Police Chief shall be appointed from said lists of qualified candidates by the City Manager. 9.2 Removal of Police Chief or Assistant Police Chief. 9.2.1 Removal by SHERIFF. The SHERIFF may remove the Police Chief or Assistant Police Chief at any time after consultation with the City Manager. 9.2.2 Removal by City Manager. The SHERIFF shall remove the Police Chief or Assistant Police Chief at any time after the written request and consultation of the City Manager. Page 9 of 24 9.2.3 Reduction of Assistant Police Chief's Rank Due to Economic Conditions. A reduction in SHERIFF'S Office Civil Service Rank due to economic necessity shall not be the sole basis for the removal of the appointed Assistant Police Chief by either the City Manager or the SHERIFF. 9.3 Duties of Police Chief. The Police Chief shall report to the City Manager or his/her designee and to the existing command structure within SHERIFF'S Office. The duties of the Police Chief shall include: 9.3.1 Working with the City Manager or his/her designee to establish goals, objectives and performance measures for CITY police Services which reflect specific needs within CITY; 9.3.2 Coordinating police activities within CITY, including hours of operation and CITY-specific protocols and procedures, attending meetings and providing reports as requested by the City Manager and such other duties common to a city police chief including enforcement of CITY codes and ordinances; 9.3.3 Reviewing the performance of all Dedicated CITY Officers. Reporting to City Manager or his/her designee and SHERIFF any serious recommendations for performance improvement; 9.3.4 Identify duties of all Dedicated CITY Officers as specific needs arise or as requested by the City Manager or his/her designee within the context of established policies and procedures. Reporting to SHERIFF any changes in duty of Dedicated CITY Officers; 9.3.5 Overseeing implementation within CITY of all SHERIFF policies and procedures. Maintaining a copy of SHERIFF procedures on file at City Hall for CITY'S reference. SHERIFF shall be notified of any public record requests to view or obtain a copy of the policies and procedures on file; 9.3.6 Notifying and providing electronic access to the City Manager or his/her designee of any change in SHERIFF procedures or policies, or resource as permitted by this Agreement; 9.3.7 Identifying areas of supplemental training for Dedicated CITY Officers. Making recommendations to SHERIFF for supplemental training. Making recommendations to the City Manager or his/her designee for training not provided by SHERIFF; 9.3.8 Providing supervision and direction to all Dedicated CITY Officers as well as other assigned personnel, and acting as liaison with SHERIFF Command Staff; Page 10 of 24 9.3.9 Maintaining communication between the City Manager and SHERIFF command structures to ensure that changes in SHERIFF policies are agreeable to CITY and that change in CITY policies are agreeable to SHERIFF. In the event a CITY procedure, policy, goal or operation differs from the SHERIFF'S, City Manager or his/her designee, SHERIFF and COUNTY shall meet and mutually determine which policy will prevail; 9.3.10 Notifying the City Manager or his/her designee of any significant criminal occurrence or civil emergency within CITY or region that would impact the public safety or operations of CITY, and 9.3.11 Coordinating with City Manager regarding maintenance and capital improvement needs of the CITY Precinct Building. 9.4 Duties of the Assistant Police Chief. Assistant Police Chief shall act as Police Chief in his/her absence and under the Police Chief as CITY Police Department's primary administrative assistant, and also work with CITY staff to provide data as requested and complete information required for CITY planning documents. 9.5 Duties of the City Manager. The City Manager or his/her designee shall have the responsibility of providing general direction and supervision to the assigned Police Chief relative to the furnishing of law enforcement Services to CITY as set forth in chapter 35A.13 RCW and the terms of this Agreement. 9.6 Duties of the SHERIFF. The SHERIFF or his designee shall make regular visits to the CITY Precinct Building and ensure that SHERIFF policies and procedures are being followed and that law enforcement Service is provided to CITY according to the terms of this Agreement and according to the standards of the SHERIFF. At the request of the City Manager, SHERIFF will make presentations to the Council and appearances at CITY functions as his schedule permits. 9.7 Quarterly Meetings-Sheriff and City Manager. The SHERIFF and the City Manager shall meet on a quarterly basis to ensure regular communication and to seek joint consideration of all matters of concern regarding this Agreement. Either party may invite representatives from their respective organizations to attend. It is intended that the Parties in these meetings review the Interlocal Agreement and discuss matters of mutual interest; monitor cost trends, work jointly on potential cost savings, revenue sources and other budgetary matters that may impact Service levels; seek long-term sustainability of contract terms; consider changes in labor contracts, review allocation of resources or other items that may impact either party. The dates of these meetings will be determined by mutual agreement but should coincide with the budget cycles of each party. 9.8 Quarterly Meeting—Financial and Contract Administration Representatives. At the request of CITY, COUNTY, or SHERIFF, representatives shall meet to discuss potential changes to the COCAP, the LECAP, or other items that may impact the CITY'S Page 11 of 24 law enforcement costs or Service levels. If possible, CITY shall be notified of such changes prior to implementation, allowing CITY an opportunity to comment. SECTION NO. 10: OBSERVATION OF LABOR NEGOTIATIONS CITY may participate with other cities that contract with COUNTY for law enforcement Services to select no more than two (2) representatives from the contracting cities to observe labor negotiations between COUNTY, SHERIFF and the collective bargaining units representing the employees of the SHERIFF, provided that such observers adhere to rules established by COUNTY, the SHERIFF and the bargaining units for the negotiations. SECTION NO. 11: PROPERTY, EQUIPMENT AND TRAINING 11.1 Ownership of Property and Equipment. The ownership of all property and equipment utilized in association with either SHERIFF or CITY meeting their responsibilities under the terms of this Agreement, shall remain with the original owner at all times to include termination, unless otherwise specifically and mutually agreed upon in writing by the Parties to this Agreement. 11.2 Stationery, Notices and Forms. CITY shall supply at its own cost and expense any special supplies, logos or patches, stationery,notices, forms where such must be issued in the name of CITY. 11.3 Additional Technology. CITY desires to maintain a police force that is trained and equipped with the latest technology. SHERIFF agrees to provide police service personnel providing Services under this Agreement that are trained and equipped with such technology as is customarily provided to deputies providing law enforcement Services in the unincorporated areas of the County. Any technology not currently in use or not customarily provided to patrol deputies, may be requested by CITY or SHERIFF. Parties agree to meet and confer over the need for the acquisition, training, or use of new technology with the final decision regarding the acquisition and use of new technology resting solely with the SHERIFF so long as CITY and COUNTY have the necessary financial resources to acquire such technology and train Dedicated CITY Officers in its use. Such costs shall be born solely by the CITY. 11.4 Additional Training. CITY has indicated that it may desire to have the Dedicated CITY Officers providing Services to CITY under the terms of this Agreement attend additional or supplemental training. The SHERIFF agrees not to unreasonably withhold approval of any written request(s) by CITY for Dedicated CITY Officers providing Services under the terms of this Agreement to attend additional or supplemental training. The SHERIFF may also require Dedicated CITY Officers assigned to provide Services to CITY under the terms of this Agreement to participate in necessary state and federal training and conferences that focus on the prevention of crime and the protection of CITY'S citizens. The costs of any additional or supplemental training requested by CITY Page 12 of 24 under this section and approved by the SHERIFF, or determined necessary by the SHERIFF shall be born solely by CITY. 11.5 Police Department Building, Maintenance, and Janitorial. CITY will provide offices, to include sufficient parking, for the City of Spokane Valley Police Department located at 12710 E. Sprague Avenue, City of Spokane Valley, 99216 or at such other location mutually agreed to between the CITY and SHERIFF. CITY shall provide all operation, maintenance and janitorial services for said offices. SECTION NO. 12: COMMUNITY IDENTITY 12.1 Vehicles. Patrol, Traffic, School Resource Officer, and Community Service vehicles that are assigned to CITY shall display the color, identification and logo of CITY at CITY'S sole expense. Additionally, the vehicles will indicate that they are SHERIFF vehicles. SHERIFF and CITY will determine the form of identification jointly. Detective and Supervisor vehicles may be left unmarked. 12.2 Uniform. SHERIFF maintains a uniform directed by state law. It is a uniform that carries a great deal of pride. CITY recognizes that the assigned personnel will retain the uniform of the Spokane County Sheriff's Office; however, SHERIFF agrees that assigned personnel shall wear additional identification in the nature of a patch, clearly indicating affiliation with CITY on uniforms,jackets, and jumpsuits. Jumpsuits shall include the word "Police"in large type on the back. The nature and design of any additional identification will be determined jointly by SHERIFF and CITY and provided to SHERIFF by CITY at CITY'S sole expense. SECTION NO. 13: RECORDS All records prepared, owned,used or retained by COUNTY or SHERIFF in conjunction with providing Services under the terms of this Agreement shall be deemed COUNTY property and shall be made available to CITY upon request by the City Manager subject to the records retention schedule set forth by the Washington State Secretary of State,the attorney client and attorney work product privileges set forth in statute, court rule or case law. The Parties agree to cooperate in complying with the provisions of chapter 42.56 RCW. Should the Agreement terminate, the Parties will meet, and discuss the nature and extent of records required to be transferred to the successor agency. The COUNTY agrees to effect the transfer no later than the last day of the contract. The cost of any transfers of records to the control of the CITY under this provision shall be assumed solely by the CITY. SECTION NO. 14: UNCONTROLLABLE CIRCUMSTANCES/IMPOSSIBILITY A delay or interruption in or failure of performance of all or any part of this Agreement resulting from Uncontrollable Circumstances shall be deemed not a default under this Agreement. Page 13 of 24 A delay or interruption in or failure of performance of all or any part of this Agreement resulting from any change in or new law, order, rule or regulation of any nature which renders providing of Services in accordance with the terms of this Agreement legally impossible, and any other circumstances beyond the control of the SHERIFF,which render legally impossible the performance by the SHERIFF of its obligations under this Agreement, shall be deemed not a default under this Agreement. SECTION NO. 15: RELATIONSHIP OF THE PARTIES For the purpose of this section, the terminology "COUNTY" shall also include SHERIFF. The Parties intend that an independent contractor relationship will be created by this Agreement. COUNTY shall be an independent contractor and not the agent or employee of CITY, that CITY is interested only in the results to be achieved and that the right to control the particular manner,method and means in which the Services are performed is solely within the discretion of the SHERIFF. Any and all employees who provide Services to CITY under this Agreement shall be deemed employees solely of the SHERIFF. The SHERIFF shall be solely responsible for the conduct and actions of all employees under this Agreement and any liability that may attach thereto. Likewise, no agent, employee, servant or representative of CITY shall be deemed to be an employee, agent, servant or representative of the SHERIFF or COUNTY for any purpose. SECTION NO. 16: LIABILITY For the purpose of this section, the terminology "COUNTY" shall also include the "PROSECUTING ATTORNEY." (a) COUNTY shall indemnify and hold harmless CITY and its officers, agents, and employees,from any and all claims,actions, suits,liability,loss,costs,expenses,and damages of any nature whatsoever, by any reason of or arising out of any negligent act or omission of COUNTY,its officers,agents and employees,relating to or arising out of performing Services pursuant to this Agreement. In the event that any suit based upon such claim, action, loss, or damages is brought against CITY, COUNTY shall defend the same at its sole cost and expense and if final judgment in said suit be rendered against CITY, and its officers, agents, and employees, or jointly against CITY and COUNTY and their respective officers, agents, and employees, COUNTY shall satisfy the same. (b) CITY shall indemnify and hold harmless COUNTY and its officers, agents, and employees,from any and all claims,actions, suits,liability,loss,costs,expenses,and damages of any nature whatsoever, by any reason of or arising out of any negligent act or omission of CITY, its officers, agents and employees, relating to or arising out of performing Services pursuant to this Agreement. In the event that any suit based upon such claim, action, loss, or damages is brought against COUNTY, CITY shall defend the same at its sole cost and expense and if final judgment in said suit be rendered against COUNTY, and its officers, Page 14 of 24 agents, and employees, or jointly against COUNTY and CITY and their respective officers, agents, and employees, CITY shall satisfy the same. (c) If the comparative negligence of the Parties and their officers and employees is a cause of such damage or injury, the liability, loss, cost, or expense shall be shared between the Parties in proportion to their relative degree of negligence and the right of indemnity shall apply to such proportion. (d) Where an officer or employee of a Party is acting under the direction and control of the other Party,the Party directing and controlling the officer or employee in the activity and/or omission giving rise to liability shall accept all liability for the other Party's officer or employee's negligence. (e) Each Party's duty to indemnify shall survive the termination or expiration of this Agreement. (f) The foregoing indemnity is specifically intended to constitute a waiver of each Party's immunity under Washington's Industrial Insurance Act, chapter 51 RCW, respecting the other party only, and only to the extent necessary to provide the indemnified Party with a full and complete indemnity of claims made by the indemnitor's employees. The Parties acknowledge that these provisions were specifically negotiated and agreed upon by them. (g) COUNTY and CITY agree to either self insure or purchase polices of insurance covering the matters contained in this Agreement with coverages of not less than $5,000,000 per occurrence with $5,000,000 aggregate limits including professional liability and auto. SECTION NO. 17: INITIATIVES AND LOCAL BUDGET REDUCTIONS The Parties recognize that revenue-reducing initiative(s) passed by the voters of Washington and/or local revenue reductions (i.e. loss of sales tax) and/or local government mandates may substantially reduce local operating revenue for CITY,COUNTY or both Parties. The Parties agree that it is necessary to have flexibility to reduce the contracted amount(s) in this Agreement in response to budget constraints resulting from the passage of State-wide revenue-reducing initiative(s) and/or local revenue reductions and/or local government mandates. If such an event occurs, the Parties agree to negotiate in good faith to achieve a mutually agreeable resolution in a timely fashion. SECTION NO. 18: DISPUTE RESOLUTION Any dispute regarding the interpretation of, failure to perform, or the costs for Services assessed under the terms of this Agreement between the SHERIFF, COUNTY or CITY shall first be reduced to writing and considered by the COUNTY CEO("Chief Executive Officer") and the City Manager if it is a monetary dispute. If it is a non-monetary dispute, it shall be reduced to writing and considered by the SHERIFF and City Manager. The City Manager and the COUNTY CEO or SHERIFF shall agree to develop a corrective action plan to address Page 15 of 24 any dispute covered in this section. The action plan shall be completed within 30 days of agreement to develop the action plan unless the Parties agree to extend this timeline. The action plan shall be implemented by the SHERIFF within 30 days of completion of the action plan. If the SHERIFF or CEO fails to complete or implement an action plan, discontinues the action plan without agreement by the City Manager, or the dispute otherwise remains unresolved, the dispute may be submitted to arbitration by any Party. COUNTY or SHERIFF, respectively, and CITY shall have the right to designate one person each to act as an arbitrator. The two selected arbitrators shall then jointly select a third arbitrator. The decision of the arbitration panel shall be binding on the Parties and shall be subject to judicial review as provided for in chapter 7.04A RCW. The costs of the arbitration panel shall be equally split between the respective Parties. SECTION NO. 19: ASSIGNMENT No party may assign in whole or part its interest in this Agreement without the written approval of the other Parties. Nothing in this section shall prohibit COUNTY or SHERIFF from contracting with third parties for Services provided for in this Agreement. SECTION NO. 20: NOTICES All notices called for or provided for in this Agreement shall be in writing and must be served on any of the Parties either personally or by certified mail, return-receipt requested, sent to the Parties at their respective addresses herein above given. Notices sent by certified mail shall be deemed served when deposited in the United States mail, postage prepaid. SECTION NO. 21: VENUE STIPULATION This Agreement has been and shall be construed as having been made and delivered within the State of Washington and it is mutually understood and agreed by each Party that this Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Washington, both as to interpretation and performance. Any action at law, suit in equity or judicial proceeding for the enforcement of this Agreement, or any provision hereto, shall be instituted only in courts of competent jurisdiction within Spokane County, Washington. SECTION NO. 22: COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS The Parties shall observe all federal, state and local laws, ordinances and regulations, to the extent that they may be applicable to the terms of this Agreement. SECTION NO. 23: DISCLAIMER Except as otherwise provided, this Agreement shall not be construed in any manner that would limit either Party's authority or powers under law. Page 16 of 24 SECTION NO. 24: HEADINGS The Section and subsection headings appearing in this Agreement have been inserted solely for the purpose of convenience and ready reference. In no way do they purport to, and shall not be deemed to, define, limit or extend the scope or intent of the sections to which they pertain. SECTION NO. 25: ALL WRITINGS CONTAINED HEREIN This Agreement contains all the terms and conditions agreed upon by the Parties. No other understandings, oral or otherwise, regarding the subject matter of this Agreement shall be deemed to exist or to bind any of the Parties. Parties have read and understand the whole of the above Agreement and now state that no representations, promises or agreements not expressed in this Agreement have been made to induce either to execute the same. SECTION NO. 26: COUNTERPARTS This Agreement may be executed in any number of multiple signed originals, each of which, when so executed and delivered, shall be an original, but such counterparts shall together constitute but one and the same. SECTION NO. 27: AGREEMENT TO BE FILED COUNTY shall file this Agreement with such offices or agencies as required by chapter 39.34 RCW. SECTION NO. 28: TIME OF ESSENCE OF AGREEMENT Time is of the essence of this Agreement and in case any Party fails to perform the obligations on its part to be performed at the time fixed for the performance of the respective obligation by the terms of this Agreement, the other respective Party may, at its election, hold the other Party liable for all costs and damages caused by such delay. SECTION NO. 29: CHAPTER 39.34 RCW REQUIRED CLAUSES A. Purpose. See Section No. 3 above. B. Agreement to be Filed. See Section No. 27 above. C. Duration. See Section No. 4 above. D. Termination. See Section No. 4 above. Page 17 of 24 E. Organization of Separate Entity and Its Powers. No new or separate legal or administrative entity is created to administer the provisions of this Agreement. F. Responsibilities of the Parties. See applicable sections within Agreement. G. Property upon Termination. See Section Nos. 4.4 and 11 above. SECTION NO. 30: SEVERABILITY The Parties agree that if any parts,terms or provisions of this Agreement are held by the courts to be illegal, the validity of the remaining portions or provisions shall not be affected and the rights and obligations of the Parties shall not be affected in regard to the remainder of the Agreement. If it should appear that any part,term or provision of this Agreement is in conflict with any statutory provision of the State of Washington, then the part, term or provision thereof that may be in conflict shall be deemed inoperative and null and void insofar as it may be in conflict therewith and this Agreement shall be deemed to modify to conform to such statutory provision. SECTION NO. 31: THIRD PARTY BENEFICIARIES. This Agreement is intended for the benefit of COUNTY, CITY and SHERIFF and not for the benefit of any third parties. SECTION NO. 32. SURVIVAL Without being exclusive, Section Nos. 16, 20, and 21 of this Agreement shall survive any termination, expiration or determination of invalidity of this Agreement in whole or in part. Any other sections of this Agreement which, by their sense and context, are intended to survive shall also survive. SECTION NO. 33. MEDIA RELEASES AND CONTACT Media releases concerning law enforcement activities covered under this Agreement will be prepared by the SHERIFF'S Public Information Officer. Any such release of information to the media that is deemed to be sensitive or likely to cause concern or alarm shall be provided to the City Manager before its release. CITY shall not issue any media releases regarding law enforcement activities covered under this Agreement without prior approval of the SHERIFF unless otherwise agreed by the Parties. SHERIFF will endeavor to have the Police Chief or designee interact with the media when appropriate. SHERIFF'S ability to interact with the media on CITY'S behalf shall not be limited by this section. SECTION NO. 34: MODIFICATION This Agreement may only be modified in writing by the mutual written agreement of the Parties. Page 18 of 24 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have caused this Agreement to be executed on the date and year opposite their respective signatures. DATED: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON MARY KUNEY, Chair ATTEST: CLERK OF THE BOARD AL FRENCH, Vice-Chair BY: GINNA VASQUEZ JOSH KERNS, Commissioner ********** DATED: SPOKANE COUNTY SHERIFF: OZZIE KNEZOVICH ********** DATED: CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY: JOHN HOHMAN, City Manager Attest: CHRISTINE BAINBRIDGE City Clerk Approved as to form only: Office of the City Attorney Page 19 of 24 Exhibit 1 — Services Provided to CITY by SHERIFF CITY Dedicated Service Units CITY Police Department Administration (Chief, Assistant Chief, Sergeant) Patrol Traffic Community Services Domestic Violence School Resource Officers K-9 Property and Drug Crimes Investigations Shared Service Units Major Crimes Sex Crimes Spokane County Investigative Unit Joint Terrorism Task Force Safe Streets (Drug Task Force and Gang Enforcement) Emergency Operations Team Public Information Officer Training/Professional Standards SHERIFF'S Community Oriented Policing Effort/ SHERIFF'S Incident Response Team Spokane Regional Emergency Communications services—Radio Dispatch, Crime Check, Computer Aided Dispatch, Communications Helicopter Forensics Records Management Property Storage Explosive Disposal Regional Investigative Group 9 - Crime Analysis Garage Firing Range Fleet SWAT/Hostage Negotiation Tactical Unit Extra Duty Employment Reservist and Explorer Units Civilian Administrative Support Regional Services Civil Marine Patrol SHERIFF Sex Offender Registration Page 20 of 24 Exhibit 2 —Performance Measures and Workload Indicators Workload Indicators Total incidents per Dedicated CITY Patrol Officer per shift Total citizen initiated Calls for Service Total citizen initiated Calls for Service with Dedicated CITY Patrol Officer response Total Dedicated CITY Officer initiated incidents Total Dedicated CITY Officer involved incidents Total incidents requiring written documentation Total incidents resulting in custodial arrest Total traffic non-criminal infractions/citations issued Total traffic control requests worked Total traffic collisions investigated Total Major Crime investigations Total Sex Crime investigations Total Property/Drug Crime investigations Behavioral Health Deputy—To match 2021 WASPC Grant Report Performance Measures Average patrol staffing per shift Citizen complaints per 1,000 Dedicated CITY Officer incidents Outcome of complaint investigations (% sustained, not sustained, exonerated, unfounded, pending, changed to inquiry) Complaints per 1,000 Dedicated CITY Officer incidents Outcome of use of force incidents (%within policy and not within policy) Average response time for priority 1, 2, and 3 Calls for Service Percentage of Calls for Service with deputy response Percentage of incidents that were deputy initiated Percentage of solvable property crime cases assigned Percentage of assigned cases solved by investigative unit Percentage of assigned cases solved by charges filed by investigative unit Collisions per capita Percentage of traffic complaints worked Actual to Budget Cost Comparisons for all Dedicated and Shared units (Salary, overtime, fuel) Behavioral Health Deputy— Time Saved Page 21 of 24 Exhibit 3 - Dedicated CITY Officers Administrative Police Chief/Undersheriff 1 Assistant Chief/Inspector 1 Sergeant 1 Patrol Lieutenant 2 Sergeant 9 Deputies 47 K-9 Deputies 3 Traffic Sergeant 1 Detectives/Corporal 1 Deputies 5 Community Services Deputy 1 Behavioral Health Deputy 1 Homeless Services Deputy 1 Domestic Violence Detective/Corporal 1 School Resource Officer Deputies 4 Property and Drug Crimes Sergeant 1 Detectives 10 Deputy 1 Total Dedicated Officers 91 Page 22 of 24 Exhibit 4 - Combined Number of Officers in Shared Units Investigations Undersheriff 1 Lieutenant DEA Deputy Major Crimes Sergeant I Detectives 8 Sex Crimes Sergeant I Detectives 7 Investigative Task Force Spokane County Investigative Unit(SCIU) Lieutenant i Regional Intelligence Group Detective Joint Terrorism Task Force Detective l Safe Streets (Drug and Gangs) Sergeant 1 Detectives 3 Deputies 1 Emergency Operations Team Deputy 2 Public Information Officer Corporal Professional Standards Lieutenant Training Sergeant 3 Corporal Deputies 1 Total Shared Officers 37 Page 23 of 24 Total Shared Officers 35 Exhibit 5 - CITY Patrol Districts CO Francis /. / 1 - i Saans°nF°T ° r _- r Vailey F o n Wellesley kF i �k o t I _ L C 59 � � .� - i 1 Trent o I I _ r _� a _ u Tre 1 di- 4 _....----fr. F_J j., 4-,..,,,- 1 § „NIL__... ., i , lir2 4.,„„ .1 _._ita,-,".i p ■■■■ �_. 1 cm,or 6 oknne n!_.. ' 7 ..1 ''VALI l=tea: -t 1 r-- ,r .. `Y o {-Cy` '. 1 1-7 1 _ - + , _ Y.. r ° o Lake _ U I + ✓3tl ' w ' m ,_ • t sth { `s ",,F ism l� E�NIAL P t r t m I �._�i 1 ?� 411104 "fist. .1� tip!_ ��� �t- Y I� tj I ,,', , u is II �.... [,-... ]I A ,rpe r II 0 1+ ,.., .1-, : + i., t+tt � � � \ 7� ice= ,' - �� Jacksenr" .4... ° 1 ;ml Spokane Valley Police Districts 1-6 �ao,ow„a,4wW�,aoa Page 24 of 24 DRAFT ADVANCE AGENDA as of April 28,2022; 9:00 a.m. Please note this is a work in progress;items are tentative To: Council&Staff From: City Clerk,by direction of City Manager Re: Draft Schedule for Upcoming Council Meetings May 10,2022,Formal Meeting,6:00 p.m. [due Tue May 3] Proclamation:Lemonade Day;Lupus Awareness Month (10 minutes) 1.Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 2.First Reading Ordinance 22-006 Comprehensive Plan Amendments—Chaz Bates (10 minutes) 3.First Reading Ordinance 22-007 Comprehensive Plan Zoning Map—Chaz Bates (10 minutes) 4.Motion Consideration Potential Grants: Safe Routes to School;2022 Pedestrian/Bicycle—Adam Jackson(10 minutes) 5.Motion Consideration:Bid Award, Sprague Avenue Preservtion—Gloria Mantz (10 minutes) 6.Admin Report:ARPA Funds for Law enforcement—Chief Ellis,Sgt.Bloomer (25 minutes) 7.Admin Report:Pavement Preservation Program—Adam Jackson,Bill Helbig (15 minutes) 8.Admin Report:CenterPlace Operations—John Hohman,Erik Lamb (15 minutes) 9.Admin Report: Senior Center Agreement—John Bottelli (10 minutes) 10.Admin Report:Advance Agenda—Mayor Haley (5 minutes) 11.Executive Session: [RCW 42.30.110(1)(b)] Acquisition of Real Estate [*estimated meeting: 125 mins] May 17,2022,Study Session, 6:00 p.m. —meeting cancelled May 24,2022,Formal Meeting,6:00 p.m. [due Tue May 17] 1.PUBLIC HEARING: 2022 Budget Amendment—Chelsie Taylor (15 minutes) 2.First Reading Ordinance 22-008 Amending 2022 Budget—Chelsie Taylor (10 minutes) 3.Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 4. Second Reading Ordinance 22-006 Comprehensive Plan Amendments—Chaz Bates (5 minutes) 5. Second Reading Ordinance 22-007 Comprehensive Plan Zoning Map—Chaz Bates (5 minutes) 6.Accomplishments Report—John Hohman (10 minutes) 7.Admin Report:Advance Agenda—Mayor Haley (5 minutes) 8.Info Only:Department Monthly Reports [*estimated meeting: 55 mins] May 31,2022,Study Session,6:00 p.m. [due Tue May 24] ACTION ITEMS: 1. Second Reading Ordinance 22-008 Amending 2022 Budget—Chelsie Taylor (10 minutes) NON-ACTION ITEMS: 2.Mirabeau Vacant Parcel—John Bottelli (10 minutes) 3.Advance Agenda—Mayor Haley (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting: mins] June 7,2022,Study Session,6:00 p.m. [due Tue May 31] Proclamation:LGBTQ+Pride Month 1. 6-year TIP—Adam Jackson (10 minutes) 2.Master Speed Limit Schedule—Jerremy Clark (10 minutes) 3.Advance Agenda—Mayor Haley (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting: mins] June 14,2022,Special Meeting: Budget Workshop 8:30 a.m. [due Tue June 7] June 14,2022,Formal Meeting,6:00 p.m. [due Tue June 7] PUBLIC HEARING:6-year TIP—Adam Jackson (15 minutes) 1.Resolution 22- Adopting TIP—Adam Jackson (5 minutes) 2.Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 3.Resolution 22- Amending Master Speed Limit Schedle—Jerremy Clark (10 minutes) 3.Admin Report: Code Text amendment,0001,Community Service Regulations—Lori Barlow (10 minutes) 4.Advance Agenda—Mayor Haley (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting: 50 mins] June 21-24:AWC Annual Conference, Vancouver, Wa. Draft Advance Agenda 4/28/2022 1:25:18 PM Page 1 of 2 June 21,2022,Study Session,6:00 p.m. —Meeting Cancelled June 28,2022,Formal Meeting,6:00 p.m. [due Tue June 21] 1.Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 2.First Reading Ordinance 22- ,Code Text Amendment 0001,Community Service Regulations—L.Barlow(10 min) 3.Admin Report:Advance Agenda—Mayor Haley (5 minutes) 4.Info Only:Department Monthly Reports [*estimated meeting: mins] July 5,2022,Study Session,6:00 p.m. [due Tue June 28] Proclamation:Parks and Recreation Month ACTION ITEMS: 1. Second reading Ordinance 22-!Code Text Amendment 0001,Community Service Regulations—Lori Barlow(5 min) NON-ACTION ITEMS: 2.Advance Agenda—Mayor Haley (5 minutes) July 12,2022,Formal Meeting,6:00 p.m. [due Tue July 5] 1.Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 2.Admin Report:Advance Agenda—Mayor Haley (5 minutes) July 19,2022,Study Session,6:00 p.m. [due Tue July 12] 1.Council Goals&Priorities for Use of Lodging Tax—Chelsie Taylor (10 minutes) 2.Advance Agenda—Mayor Haley (5 minutes) July 26,2022,Formal Meeting,6:00 p.m. [due Tue July 19] Proclamation:National Night Out 1.Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 2.Admin Report:Advance Agenda—Mayor Haley (5 minutes) 3.Info Only:Department Monthly Reports [*estimated meeting: mins] August 2,2022,Study Session, 6:00 p.m. —meeting cancelled(National Night Out) August 9,2022,Formal Meeting,6:00 p.m. [due Tue Aug 2] 1.Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 2.motion Consideration:Council Goals&Priorities for Use of Lodging Tax—Chelsie Taylor (15 minutes) 3.Admin Report:Advance Agenda—Mayor Haley (5 minutes) August 16,2022,Study Session,6:00 p.m. [due Tue Aug 2] 1.Advance Agenda—Mayor Haley (5 minutes) August 23,2022,Formal Meeting,6:00 p.m. [due Tue Aug 16] 1.Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 2.Admin Report:2323 Budget,Estimated Revenues&Expenditures—Chelsie Taylor (15 minutes) 3.Admin Report:Advance Agenda—Mayor Haley (5 minutes) 4.Info Only:Department Monthly Reports [*estimated meeting: mins] August 30,2022,Study Session,6:00 p.m. [due Tue Aug 23] 1.Advance Agenda—Mayor Haley (5 minutes) *time for public or Council comments not included OTHER PENDING AND/OR UPCOMING ISSUES/MEETINGS: Appleway Trail Amenities Mirabeau Park Forestry Mgmt. Vehicle Wgt Infrastructure Impact Artwork&Metal Boxes Neighborhood Restoration Water Districts&Green Space Basement space Park Lighting Way Finding Signs CDBG Interlocal PFD Presentation Compression Brakes Prosecutor Services Consolidated Homeless Grant Residency Continuum of Care(info item?) SCRAPS Update Core Beliefs Resolution St.Illumination(owners,cost,location) Gov.Auth.Emergencies(info) St. O&M Pavement Preservation Draft Advance Agenda 4/28/2022 1:25:18 PM Page 2 of 2 City of Spokane Valley Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 3/01/2022 - 3/31/2022 Page Title 1 Cover Sheet 2 Pre-Application Meeting Requested 3 Construction Applications Received 4 Engineering Applications Received 5 Land Use Applications Received 6 Construction Permits Issued 7 Engineering Permits Issued 8 Land Use Applications Completed 9 Inspections Performed 10 Code Enforcement 11 Revenue 12 Building Permit Valuations Created On: 4/12/2022 Page 1 of 12 Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 3/1/2022 - 3/31/2022 Pre-Application Meeting Requested A Pre-Application Meeting is a service provided to help our customers identify the code requirements related to their project proposal Community & Public Works Department scheduled a total of 23 Pre-Application Meetings in March 2022 Spokane Valley Pre-Application Meeting Requests 30 25 20 2g 15 10 5 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec ■Commercial Pre-App Land Use Pre-App ■** NOT SUBMITTED Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Commercial Pre-App 5 6 18 Land Use Pre-App 7 10 5 ** NOT SUBMITTED 1 2 3 Monthly Totals 12 16 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Annual-To-Date: 51 **NOT SUBMITTED is a new category created by SmartGov which separates permits that have not entered details or provided documents for reviev Created On: 4/12/2022 Page 2 of 12 Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 3/1/2022 - 3/31/2022 Construction Applications Received The applications recevied are those that include projects for New, remodeled, and accessory buildings; Signs, Factory Assembled Structures (FAS), Trade, Roofs, and more. Community & Public Works Department recevied a total of 414 Construction Applications in March 2022 Spokane Valley Construction Applications Received 500 400 = 300 ii 200 100 0 J Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec •Commercial New Commercial TI •Commercial Trade •Residential New •Residential Remodel •Residential Trade u Residential Accessory Demolition Sign •Re-Roof Factory Assembled •Other Construction ** NOT SUBMITTED *Other Construction applications include,Adult family Home Inspections,Cell tower modifications,solar panels,swimming pool/hot tub Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Commercial New 23 9 7 Commercial TI 13 14 24 Commercial Trade 48 23 28 Residential New 19 20 9 Residential Remodel 17 13 23 Residential Trade 150 164 182 Residential Accessory 13 7 22 Demolition 4 3 7 Sign 10 10 4 Re-Roof 31 45 89 Factory Assembled 2 0 3 Other Construction 9 16 5 ** NOT SUBMITTED 38 60 41 Monthly Totals 339 324 403 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Annual-To-Date: 1066 **NOT SUBMITTED is a new category created by SmartGov which separates permits that have not entered details or provided documents for reviev Created On: 4/12/2022 Page 3 of 12 Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 3/1/2022 - 3/31/2022 Engineering Applications Received The applications received are those that include projects for all site work projects, such as Grading permits, Right-of-Way (ROW), approaches, and more. Community & Public Works Department received a total of 117 Engineering Applications in March 2022 Engineering Applications Received 140 120 ®I 100 80 60 40 20 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec •Engineered Grading Regular Grading Right-of-Way 11 Approach •Clearing Et Grubbing •**NOT SUBMITTED Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Engineered Grading 10 5 9 Regular Grading 0 0 1 Right-of-Way 62 92 93 Approach 0 9 14 Clearing &Grubbing 1 0 0 **NOT SUBMITTED 4 5 6 Monthly Totals 73 106 117 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Annual-To-Date: 296 **NOT SUBMITTED is a new category created by SmartGov which separates permits that have not entered details or provided documents for reviev Created On: 4/12/2022 Page 4 of 12 Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 3/1/2022 - 3/31/2022 Land Use Applications Received The applications received are those that include projects that involve land development, such as Platting actions, Boundary Lines Adjustments, Zoning, SEPA and Exceptions Community & Public Works Department received a total of 93 Land Use Applications in March 2022 Spokane Valley Land Use Applications Received 100 0 60 40 20 m 0 — Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec •Boundary Line Adj Short Plat •Long Plat •Binding Site Plan •Final Platting ■Zoning/Comp Amend ■Accessory Dwelling SEPA Admin Exception •Admin Interpretation Home Business Lic ■Other Development ** NOT SUBMITTED **Other Development could include,Zoning Letter,Floodplain,Shoreline,Alterations,Variances,Small Cell,CUP,Street Vacations,etc... Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Boundary Line Adj 6 2 4 Short Plat 3 1 3 Long Plat 1 1 1 Binding Site Plan 1 0 1 Final Platting 4 4 5 Zoning/Comp Amend 0 1 0 Accessory Dwelling 1 0 2 SEPA 1 0 2 Admin Exception 2 0 3 Admin Interpretation 0 0 1 Home Business Lic 53 60 56 Other Development 2 2 8 ** NOT SUBMITTED 5 11 7 Monthly Totals 74 82 93 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Annual-To-Date: 249 **NOT SUBMITTED is a new category created by SmartGov which separates permits that have not entered details or provided documents for reviev Created On: 4/12/2022 Page 5 of 12 Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 3/1/2022 - 3/31/2022 Construction Permits Issued The applications issued are those that include projects for New, remodeled, and accessory buildings; Signs, Factory Assembled Structures (FAS), Trade, Roofs, and more. Community & Public Works Department Issued a total of 371 Construction Permits in March 2022 Spokane Valley Construction Permits Issued 400 300 U 200 100 0 — — Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec •Commercial New Commercial TI •Commercial Trade •Residential New •Residential Remodel •Residential Trade ■Residential Accessory Demolition Sign •Re-Roof Factory Assembled •Other Construction* *Other Construction applications include,Adult family Home Inspections,Cell tower modifications,swimming pool/hot tub Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Commercial New 6 0 7 Commercial TI 3 2 20 Commercial Trade 44 23 11 Residential New 8 6 5 Residential Remodel 7 8 16 Residential Trade 147 158 172 Residential Accessory 4 0 18 Demolition 3 3 6 Sign 6 6 3 Re-Roof 31 44 89 Factory Assembled 1 0 2 Other Construction* 3 9 5 Monthly Totals 263 259 354 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Annual-To-Date: 876 Created On: 4/12/2022 Page 6 of 12 Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 3/1/2022 - 3/31/2022 Engineering Permits Issued The applications issued are those that include projects for all site work projects, such as Grading permits, Right-of-Way (ROW), approaches, and more. Community & Public Works Department issued a total of 87 Engineering permits in March 2022 Engineering Permits Issued 100 80 60 40 20 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec ■Engineered Grading Regular Grading Right-of-Way 1 i Approach ■Clearing Et Grubbing Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Engineered Grading 0 0 2 Regular Grading 0 0 1 Right-of-Way 54 75 75 Approach 0 8 9 Clearing &Grubbing 1 0 0 Monthly Totals 55 83 87 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Annual-To-Date: 225 Created On: 4/12/2022 Page 7 of 12 Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 3/1/2022 - 3/31/2022 Land Use Applications Completed The applications completed are those that include projects that involve land development, such as Platting actions, Boundary Line Adjustments, Zoning, SEPA and Exceptions Community & Public Works Department completed a total of 58 Land Use Applications in March 2022 Spokane Valley Land Use Applications Completed 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 — Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec •Boundary Line Adj Short Plat •Long Plat •Binding Site Plan •Final Platting •Zoning/Comp Amend n Accessory Dwelling SEPA Admin Exception •Admin Interpretation Home Business Lic •Other Development **Other Development could include,Zoning Letter,Floodplain,Shoreline,Alterations,Variances,Small Cell,CUP,Street Vacations,etc... Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Boundary Line Adj 0 0 0 Short Plat 0 0 0 Long Plat 0 0 0 Binding Site Plan 0 0 0 Final Platting 0 0 0 Zoning/Comp Amend 0 0 0 Accessory Dwelling 0 0 1 SEPA 0 0 0 Admin Exception 2 0 3 Admin Interpretation 0 0 1 Home Business Lic 41 50 51 Other Development 2 1 2 Monthly Totals 45 51 58 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Annual-To-Date: 154 Created On: 4/12/2022 Page 8 of 12 Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 3/1/2022 - 3/31/2022 Development Inspections Performed Community & Public Works Department performed a total of 1846 Development Inspections in March 2022. Development Inspections include building, planning, engineering and ROW Spokane Valley Development Inspections Performed 2000 1800 1600 1400 100 ................4.0"'".....4\/ . 4......... 1000 800 600 400 200 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec —9-2020 2021 2022 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Totals 2022 1077 1252 1846 _ ______ 4,175 2021 927 991 1625 1758 1661 1533 1617 1550 1253 1345 1473 1372 17,105 2020 1011 1215 1260 857 1503 1745 1846 1622 1489 1461 1173 1104 16,286 IMonthly Totals 1011 1,215 1260 857 1503 1745 1846 1622 1489 1461 1173 1104 16,286 Annual-To-Date: 16,286 Created On: 4/12/2022 Page 9 of 12 Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 3/1/2022 - 3/31/2022 Code Enforcement Code Enforcement Officers responded to 73 citizen requests in the month of March 2022. They are listed by type below. Please remember that all complaints, even those that have no violation, must be investigated Code Enforcement Complaints Investigated 80 70 60 50 Ii Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec •CE-Stop Work Order Complaint (Non-Violent) Environmental 11 General •Nuisance •Property Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec CE-Stop Work Order 0 0 Complaint(Non-violent) 0 0 Environmental 1 0 1 General 3 0 Nuisance 34 29 57 Property 6 7 15 Monthly Totals 44 36 73 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Annual-To-Date: 153 Created On: 4/12/2022 Page 10 of 12 Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 3/1/2022 - 3/31/2022 Revenue Community & Public Works Department Revenue,which are fees taken in on all applications, totaled $171,413 in March 2022. Spokane Valley Revenue Received $1,200,000 $1,000,000 $800,000 $600,000 $400,000 NMI $200,000 $0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec t 2022 2021 5-Yr Trend Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Totals 2022 $173,509 $139,945 $171,413 $484,867 5-Yr Trend $366,357 $218,434 $271,256 $264,059 $285,589 $266,794 $282,184 $284,416 $244,563 $282,804 $255,050 $246,424 $3,267,931 2021 $1,087,310 $196,293 $364,569 $459,905 $239,948 $367,253 $433,461 $430,383 $323,636 $396,162 $292,643 $329,244 $4,920,807 2020 $230,256 $402,862 $371,956 $237,120 $402,525 $309,668 $226,943 $188,990 $268,487 $254,775 $246,368 $223,685 $3,363,635 2019 $162,441 $228,717 $265,529 $195,244 $241,906 $233,496 $355,943 $304,988 $228,157 $294,794 $299,906 $349,821 $3,160,942 2018 $177,431 $117,425 $220,845 $206,090 $234,009 $158,168 $260,179 $362,478 $253,342 $270,649 $204,016 $169,751 $2,634,383 2017 $174,349 $146,874 $133,382 $221,935 $309,558 $265,383 $134,394 $135,242 $149,194 $197,639 $232,319 $159,618 $2,259,887 Created On: 4/12/2022 Page 11 of 12 Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 3/1/2022 - 3/31/2022 Building Permit Valuation Community&Public Works Department building permit valuation,which include,residential,commercial,reroof,FAS placed,totaled $14,935,549 in March 2022. Spokane Valley Permit Valuation $200,000,000 - $180,000,000 $160,000,000 $140,000,000 $120,000,000 $100,000,000 $80,000,000 • $60,000,000 - $40,000,000 $20,000,000 $0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Totals —8-2022 t 5-Yr Trend —0-2021 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2022 $20,182,361 $31,376,013 $14,935,549 $66,493,923 5-Yr Trend $14,662,000 $49,352,000 $71,170,000 $22,362,000 $28,434,000 $26,908,000 $33,764,000 $17,058,000 $16,542,000 $21,406,000 $34,474,000 $18,254,000 $263.30M 2021 $8,860,000 $179,080,000 $16,720,000 $32,820,000 $22,430,000 $27,700,000 $65,190,000 $24,390,000 $18,160,000 $42,670,000 $17,710,000 $13,480,000 $469.21M 2020 $22,130,000 $20,750,000 $36,690,000 $27,670,000 $51,380,000 $29,930,000 $17,950,000 $7,610,000 $20,620,000 $15,270,000 $26,890,000 $21,380,000 $298.27M 2019 $5,660,000.00 $22,210,000.00 $19,460,000.00 $12,460,000.00 $23,150,000.00 $15,020,000.00 $46,650,000.00 $18,800,000.00 $14,360,000.00 $17,160,000.00 $35,210,000.00 $32,930,000.00 $263.07M 2018 $12,840,000.00 $6,350,000.00 $276,000,000.00 $7,870,000.00 $9,550,000.00 $26,260,000.00 $29,250,000.00 $25,440,000.00 $20,690,000.00 $21,880,000.00 $25,460,000.00 $6,700,000.00 $219.89M 2017 $23,820,000.00 $18,370,000.00 $6,980,000.00 $30,990,000.00 $35,660,000.00 $35,630,000.00 $9,780,000.00 $9,050,000.00 $8,880,000.00 $10,050,000.00 $67,100,000.00 $16,780,000.00 $2573.09M Created On: 4/12/2022 Page 12 of 12