Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
2022, 05-24 Formal Meeting
AGENDA SPOKANE VALLEY CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING FORMAL FORMAT Tuesday, May 24, 2022 6:00 p.m. Remotely via ZOOM Meeting and In Person at 10210 E Sprague Avenue Council Requests Please Silence Your Cell Phones During Council Meeting NOTE:. In response to Governor Inslee's announcement reopening Washington under the "Washington Ready" plan, members of the public may attend Spokane Valley Council meetings in -person at City Hall at the address provided above, or via Zoom at the link below. Members of the public will be allowed to comment in -person or via Zoom as described below. If wishing to make a comment via Zoom, comments must be received by 4:00 pm the day of the meeting. Otherwise, comments will be taken in -person at the meeting in Council Chambers, as noted on the agenda below. • Sign up to Provide Oral Public Comment at the Meeting via Calling -In • Submit Written Public Comment Prior to the Meeting • Join the Zoom WEB Meeting CALL TO ORDER INVOCATION: Pastor Mathew Larson, Advent Lutheran Church PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL APPROVAL OF AGENDA INTRODUCTION OF SPECIAL GUESTS AND PRESENTATIONS COMMITTEE, BOARD, LIAISON SUMMARY REPORTS MAYOR'S REPORT PROCLAMATION: GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT OPPORTUNITY 111: This is an opportunity for the public to speak on any subject except agenda action items, as public comments will be taken on those items where indicated. Please keep comments to matters within the jurisdiction of the City Government. This is not an opportunity for questions or discussion. Diverse points of view are welcome but please keep remarks civil. Remarks will be limited to three minutes per person. To comment via zoom: use the link above for oral or written comments as per those directions. To comment at the meeting in person: speakers may sign in to speak but it is not required. A sign -in sheet will be provided in Council Chambers. Whether in person or via zoom, speakers should indicate if they want to speak at General Public Comment Opportunity [1] or [2] and may only speak at one or the other, but not both. 1. PUBLIC HEARING: 2022 Budget Amendment — Chelsie Taylor [public comment opportunity] 2. First Reading Ordinance 22-008 Amending 2022 Budget — Chelsie Taylor [no public comment] Council Agenda May 24, 2022 Page 1 of 2 NEW BUSINESS: 3. Consent Agenda: Consists of items considered routine which are approved as a group. Any member of Council may ask that an item be removed from the Consent Agenda to be considered separately. Proposed Motion: I move to approve the Consent Agenda. a. Approval of Claim Vouchers on May 24, 2022, Request for Council Action Form: $1,376,819.40 b. Approval of Payroll for Pay Period ending May 15, 2022: $422,413.29 c. Approval of Council Meeting Minutes of May 3, 2022, Study Session d. Approval of Council Meeting Minutes of May 10, 2022, Formal Meeting 4. Second Reading Ordinance 22-006_Comprehensive Plan Amendments — Chaz Bates [no public comment] 5. Second Reading Ordinance 22-007 Comprehensive Plan Zoning Map — Chaz Bates [no public comment] 6. First Reading Ordinance 22-009 Public Parking — Cary Driskell [public comment opportunity] 7. Motion Consideration: Barker GSP Change Order — Bill Helbig [public comment opportunity] GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT OPPORTUNITY [2]: This is an opportunity for the public to speak on any subject except agenda action items, as public comments will be taken on those items where indicated. Please keep comments to matters within the jurisdiction of the City Government. This is not an opportunity for questions or discussion. Diverse points of view are welcome but please keep remarks civil. Remarks will be limited to three minutes per person. To comment via zoom: use the link above for oral or written comments as per those directions. To comment at the meeting in person: speakers may sign in to speak but it is not required. A sign -in sheet will be provided in Council Chambers. Whether in person or via zoom, speakers should indicate if they want to speak at General Public Comment Opportunity [1] or [2] and may only speak at one or the other, but not both. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS: 8. Fire Department Monthly Report — Chief Soto 9. Accomplishments Report — John Hohman 10. Advance Agenda — Mayor Haley INFORMATION ONLY: Will not be reported or discussed. 11. Department Monthly Reports CITY MANAGER COMMENTS: ADJOURNMENT Council Agenda May 24, 2022 Page 2 of 2 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: May 24, 2022 Check all that apply: ['consent ❑ old business ['information ['admin. report Department Director Approval: ['new business ® public hearing ['pending legislation ['executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Public Hearing on the proposed 2022 Budget Amendment. GOVERNING LEGISLATION: In order for the City to amend an adopted budget, State law requires the Council to approve an ordinance that appropriates additional funds. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: The Council last took formal action on the 2022 Budget when it was adopted on November 9, 2021. On May 3, 2022 an Administrative Report was delivered to Council regarding the need for a budget amendment. BACKGROUND: Since the initial adoption of the 2022 Budget on November 9, 2021, a number of events have transpired in the normal course of operations that necessitate a 2022 Budget amendment. The proposed budget amendments include: #001 - General Fund The total of recurring and nonrecurring revenues reflect an increase of $517,000, which is comprised of: • Grant proceeds are decreased by $160,000 to reflect the actual HHAA funds awarded to the City. • $23,000 decrease in Parks and Recreation revenues due to updated estimates for 2022. • $700,000 increase in nonrecurring transfers in from the Capital Reserve Fund #312 for costs related to repairs of City Hall. Council approved these expenditures at the May 3, 2022 Council meeting. Provide additional appropriations (expenditures) of $5,069,511 comprised of: • $36,342 increase in salaries, payroll taxes, and benefits costs for the City Council Department related to increased councilmember salaries from the Salary Commission effective April 19, 2022. • A net $0 change in the City Council Department to move the Mayor's travel budget to the appropriate position number. • $55,813 increase in salaries and related payroll taxes and benefits in the City Facilities Department to add a custodian position for City Hall. This position was approved by Council at the December 14, 2021 Council meeting. • $55,813 decrease in janitorial services in the City Facilities Department to account for the hiring of an in-house custodian. • $475,000 increase in code enforcement abatement costs in the Building Department due to several high -cost abatements that have either occurred or are planned in 2022. • A net $175,364 increase across various City Departments due to a reorganization that occurred in early 2022. This reorganization included the addition of one new FTE for a Community and Public Works Director, which was approved by Council at the February 15, 2022 Council meeting. • $89,805 to replenish the Winter Weather Reserve Fund #122 back to a fund balance of $500,000. The Street O&M Fund was over budget on snow removal expenditures in 2021 by about $89,805. 1 • $3,593,000 transferred to Capital Reserve Fund #312 which represents the 2020 yearend fund balance in excess of 50% of recurring expenditures. • $700,000 in additional City Hall repair costs. Council approved these expenditures at the May 3, 2022 Council meeting. #104 — Hotel/Motel Tax — Tourism Facilities Fund $273,000 increase in transfers in from the Hotel/Motel Tax Fund #105. This increase reflects a Council motion on December 14, 2021, as part of the lodging tax grant process for the 2022 awards. #105 — Hotel / Motel Tax Fund Net change of $0 in expenditures; however, transfers out to the Hotel / Motel Tax — Tourism Facilities Fund #104 are increased by $273,000 and tourism promotion costs are reduced by $273,000, as was approved during the lodging tax process at the December 14, 2021 Council meeting. #122 — Winter Weather Reserve Fund Revenues are increased by $89,805 reflecting a transfer in from the General Fund #001 to replenish the fund balance to $500,000. The Street O&M Fund was over budget on snow removal expenditures in 2021 by about $89,805, which was reimbursed to Fund #101 from Fund #122 during that year. #303 — Street Capital Projects Fund Revenues and expenditures are proposed to increase by $750,000 to add construction for the Buckeye Ave. Sewer Extension project. This is funded through an allocation of CLFR funds as authorized by Council at the April 19, 2022 Council meeting. #310 — Civic Facilities Capital Projects Fund Expenditures are increased by $560,000 for the City's contribution to the joint improvement costs of the new library being constructed adjacent to Balfour Park as outlined in the Memorandum of Understanding with the Library District. #312 — Capital Reserve Fund Revenues are increased due to a transfer of $3,593,000 from General Fund #001 which represents the 2020 yearend fund balance in excess of 50% of recurring expenditures. Expenditures are increased by $1,459,600 comprised of $759,600 for the amount still owing for the purchase of the WSDOT property adjacent to Sullivan Park and $700,000 in transfers out to the General Fund #001 for repair costs for City Hall. The 2022 Budget amendment also includes changes to the Employee Position Classification Monthly Salary Schedule to incorporate various changes from the City's reorganization, including the addition of the new Community and Public Works Director position. The 2022 Budget amendment reflects the changes noted above and will affect 6 funds resulting in total revenue increases of $5,222,805 and expenditure increases of $7,839,111. Revenue Expenditure Fund Fund Increase Increase No. Name (Decrease) (Decrease) 001 General Fund 104 Hotel/Motel Tax - Tourism Facilities Fund 105 Hotel/Motel Tax Fund 122 Winter Weather Reserve Fund 89,805 303 Street Capital Projects Fund 750,000 750,000 310 Civic Facilities Capital Projects Fund 0 560,000 312 Capital Reserve Fund 3,593,000 1,459,600 517,000 273,000 0 5,069,511 0 0 0 2 5,222,805 7,839,111 OPTIONS: Future options are to accept the proposed amendments in whole or in -part. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: The purpose of this evening's public hearing is to consider input from the public on the proposed budget amendment and no action is required of Council at this time. Anticipated future action by the Council includes: • May 24, 2022 — First reading of Ordinance #22-008 amending the 2022 Budget. • May 31, 2022 — Second reading of Ordinance #22-008 amending the 2022 Budget. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: This action amends the estimated revenues and appropriations for the 2022 Budget that was adopted on November 9, 2021. There are adequate funds available to pay for these amendments. STAFF CONTACT: Chelsie Taylor, Finance Director ATTACHMENTS: • Fund level line -item detail of revenues and expenditures. • Fund summaries for all funds affected by the proposed budget amendment. • Proposed amended Employee Position Classification Monthly Salary Schedule. 3 P:\Finance\2022 Budget\Budget AmendmentWmendment #1 \2022 05 24 Public Hearing & 1st Reading\2022 Amendment No 1 Detail v2 for RCA CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA 2022 Budget - Amendment #1 Line Item Detail 5/24/2022 Account Description Account Number Description / Justification Initial Budget Amendment Amended Budget #001 - General Fund Recurring Revenues HHAA Grant - County Splash Down Concessions Evergreen Volleyball Assc Fees CenterPlace Long -Term Rentals 001.013.000.337.65.00 001.076.302.362.30.01 001.076.303.347.30.50 001.076.305.362.50.01 Recurring Expenditures Salaries and Wages - Council Payroll Taxes & Benefits - Council Travel/Mileage Position 4 Travel/Mileage Position 5 001.011.000.511.60.10.00 001.011.000.511.60.20.00 001.011.000.511.60.43.14 001.011.000.511.60.43.15 Salaries and Wages - City Manager 001.013.000.513.10.10.00 Payroll Taxes & Benefits - City Manager 001.013.000.513.10.20.00 Salaries and Wages - HHS 001.013.000.565.40.10.00 Payroll Taxes & Benefits - HHS 001.013.000.565.40.20.00 Supplies - HHS 001.013.000.565.40.31.01 Professional Services - HHS 001.013.000.565.40.41.05 Cell Phones - HHS 001.013.000.565.40.42.03 Travel/Mileage - HHS 001.013.000.565.40.43.01 Shelter Space Rental 001.013.000.565.40.45.00 Memberships 001.013.000.565.40.49.02 Registrations/Training 001.013.000.565.40.49.04 Payroll Taxes & Benefits - City Attorney 001.013.015.515.32.20.00 Salaries and Wages - DCM 001.018.013.513.10.10.00 Payroll Taxes & Benefits - DCM 001.018.013.513.10.20.00 Salaries and Wages - Finance 001.018.014.514.23.10.00 Payroll Taxes & Benefits - Finance 001.018.014.514.23.20.00 Supplies - Finance 001.018.014.514.23.31.01 Cell Phones - Finance 001.018.014.514.23.42.03 Travel/Mileage - Finance 001.018.014.514.23.43.01 Copier Maintenance - Finance 001.018.014.514.23.48.02 Memberships - Finance 001.018.014.514.23.49.02 Registrations - Finance 001.018.014.514.23.49.04 - Decrease to actual grant award - Decrease due to updated expectations - Increase for new contract - Decrease due to no longer doing these Total recurring revenues - Adjust for Salary Commission increase - Adjust for Salary Commission increase - Adjust travel budget to mayor - Adjust travel budget to mayor - Adjust for reorganization - Adjust for reorganization - Adjust for reorganization - Adjust for reorganization - Adjust for reorganization - Adjust for reorganization - Adjust for reorganization - Adjust for reorganization - Adjust for reorganization - Adjust for reorganization - Adjust for reorganization - Adjust for reorganization - Adjust for reorganization - Adjust for reorganization - Adjust for reorganization - Adjust for reorganization - Adjust for reorganization - Adjust for reorganization - Adjust for reorganization - Adjust for reorganization - Adjust for reorganization - Adjust for reorganization 260,000 (160,000) 100,000 15,000 (15,000) 0 3,000 4,000 7,000 12,000 (12,000) 0 (183,000) 123,180 33,420 156,600 191,390 2,922 194,312 8,000 (4,000) 4,000 4,000 4,000 8,000 768,433 (190,915) 577,518 350,012 (81,504) 268,508 93,000 (93,000) 0 49,460 (49,460) 0 2,500 (2,500) 0 101,000 (101,000) 0 600 (600) 0 1,000 (1,000) 0 24,000 (24,000) 0 200 (200) 0 1,000 (1,000) 0 179,615 (11,901) 167,714 189,082 186,674 375,756 65,795 62,271 128,066 1,057,255 (192,936) 864,319 482,288 (118,827) 363,461 3,400 (500) 2,900 3,000 (3,000) 0 5,200 (800) 4,400 2,400 (200) 2,200 1,500 (100) 1,400 11,800 (8,100) 3,700 Page 1 of 6 P:\Finance\2022 Budget\Budget AmendmentWmendment #1 \2022 05 24 Public Hearing & 1st Reading\2022 Amendment No 1 Detail v2 for RCA CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA 2022 Budget - Amendment #1 Line Item Detail 5/24/2022 Account Description Account Number Description / Justification Initial Budget Amendment Amended Budget #001 - General Fund - continued Recurring Expenditures -continued Salaries and Wages - HR Payroll Taxes & Benefits - HR Salaries and Wages - IT Payroll Taxes & Benefits - IT Supplies - IT Small Tools & Minor Equipment - IT Cell Phones - IT Travel/Mileage - IT Copier Maintenance - IT Memberships - IT Registrations - IT Salaries and Wages - Facilities Payroll Taxes & Benefits - Facilities Janitorial Services - Facilities Salaries and Wages - CPW Admin Payroll Taxes & Benefits - CPW Admin Office Supplies - CPW Admin Cell Phones - CPW Admin Travel - CPW Admin Copier Maintenance - CPW Admin 001.018.016.518.10.10.00 001.018.016.518.10.20.00 001.018.017.518.80.10.00 001.018.017.518.80.20.00 001.018.017.518.80.31.01 001.018.017.518.80.35.01 001.018.017.518.80.42.03 001.018.017.518.80.43.01 001.018.017.518.80.48.02 001.018.017.518.80.49.02 001.018.017.518.80.49.04 001.033.000.518.30.10.00 001.033.000.518.30.20.00 001.033.000.518.30.41.21 001.040.000.518.90.10.00 001.040.000.518.90.20.00 001.040.000.518.90.31.01 001.040.000.518.90.42.03 001.040.000.518.90.43.01 001.040.000.518.90.48.02 Software Licenses & Maint. - CPW Admir 001.040.000.518.90.48.03 Registrations - CPW Admin 001.040.000.518.90.49.04 Salaries and Wages - Engineering 001.040.041.543.10.10.00 Payroll Taxes & Benefits - Engineering 001.040.041.543.10.20.00 Office Supplies - Engineering 001.040.041.543.10.31.01 Spokane County GIS - Engineering 001.040.041.543.10.41.03 Cell Phones - Engineering 001.040.041.543.10.42.03 Travel - Engineering 001.040.041.543.10.43.01 Copier Maintenance - Engineering 001.040.041.543.10.48.02 Software Licenses & Maint. - Engineerinc 001.040.041.543.10.48.03 Registrations - Engineering 001.040.041.543.10.49.04 Payroll Taxes & Benefits - Engineering 001.040.041.558.50.20.00 Office Supplies - Engineering 001.040.041.558.50.31.01 Spokane County GIS - Engineering 001.040.041.558.50.41.03 - Adjust for reorganization - Adjust for reorganization - Adjust for reorganization - Adjust for reorganization - Adjust for reorganization - Adjust for reorganization - Adjust for reorganization - Adjust for reorganization - Adjust for reorganization - Adjust for reorganization - Adjust for reorganization - Add custodian position - Add custodian position - Decrease due to adding custodian position - Adjust for reorganization - Adjust for reorganization - Adjust for reorganization - Adjust for reorganization - Adjust for reorganization - Adjust for reorganization - Adjust for reorganization - Adjust for reorganization - Adjust for reorganization - Adjust for reorganization - Adjust for reorganization - Adjust for reorganization - Adjust for reorganization - Adjust for reorganization - Adjust for reorganization - Adjust for reorganization - Adjust for reorganization - Adjust for reorganization - Adjust for reorganization - Adjust for reorganization 212,904 9,626 222,530 89,657 (4,582) 85,075 0 276,588 276,588 0 113,835 113,835 0 300 300 0 200 200 0 3,000 3,000 0 800 800 0 200 200 0 200 200 0 8,000 8,000 131,528 40,572 172,100 64,092 15,241 79,333 80,000 (55,813) 24,187 0 223,884 223,884 0 75,044 75,044 0 700 700 0 960 960 0 250 250 0 300 300 0 840 840 0 250 250 909,701 (45,708) 863,993 421,297 (37,073) 384,224 6,500 (525) 5,975 8,900 (1,155) 7,745 6,816 (960) 5,856 5,500 (250) 5,250 4,500 (225) 4,275 18,810 (840) 17,970 5,175 (250) 4,925 268,407 (14,830) 253,577 2,500 (175) 2,325 7,056 (330) 6,726 Page 2 of 6 P:\Finance\2022 Budget\Budget AmendmentWmendment #1 \2022 05 24 Public Hearing & 1st Reading\2022 Amendment No 1 Detail v2 for RCA CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA 2022 Budget - Amendment #1 Line Item Detail 5/24/2022 Account Description Account Number Description / Justification Initial Budget Amendment Amended Budget #001 - General Fund - continued Recurring Expenditures -continued Copier Maintenance - Engineering 001.040.041.558.50.48.02 Software Licenses & Maint. - Engineerinc 001.040.041.558.50.48.03 Salaries and Wages - Econ Dev 001.040.042.558.70.10.00 Payroll Taxes & Benefits - Econ Dev 001.040.042.558.70.20.00 Office Supplies - Econ Dev 001.040.042.558.70.31.01 Spokane County GIS - Econ Dev 001.040.042.558.70.41.03 Copier Maintenance - Econ Dev 001.040.042.558.70.48.02 Salaries and Wages - HHS 001.040.042.565.40.10.00 Payroll Taxes & Benefits - HHS 001.040.042.565.40.20.00 Supplies - HHS 001.040.042.565.40.31.01 Professional Services - HHS 001.040.042.565.40.41.05 Cell Phones - HHS 001.040.042.565.40.42.03 Travel/Mileage - HHS 001.040.042.565.40.43.01 Shelter Space Rental - HHS 001.040.042.565.40.45.00 Memberships - HHS 001.040.042.565.40.49.02 Registrations/Training - H HS 001.040.042.565.40.49.04 Salaries and Wages - Code Enf. 001.040.043.524.60.10.00 Payroll Taxes & Benefits - Code Enf. 001.040.043.524.60.20.00 Vehicle Maintenance Supplies - Code En 001.040.043.524.60.31.10 Software Licenses & Maint. - Code Enf. 001.040.043.524.60.48.03 Code Enforcement Abatement 001.040.043.524.60.49.08 Salaries and Wages - Building 001.040.043.558.50.10.00 Payroll Taxes & Benefits - Building 001.040.043.558.50.20.00 Office Supplies - Building 001.040.043.558.50.31.01 Vehicle Maintenance Supplies - Bldg 001.040.043.558.50.31.10 Copier Maintenance - Building 001.040.043.558.50.48.02 Software Licenses & Maint. - Building 001.040.043.558.50.48.03 Salaries and Wages - Building 001.040.043.558.60.10.00 Payroll Taxes & Benefits - Building 001.040.043.558.60.20.00 Office Supplies - Building 001.040.043.558.60.31.01 Publications - Building 001.040.043.558.60.31.03 Meeting Supplies - Building 001.040.043.558.60.31.05 Small Tools & Minor Equipment - Bldg 001.040.043.558.60.35.01 Spokane County GIS - Building 001.040.043.558.60.41.03 Professional Services - Building 001.040.043.558.60.41.05 - Adjust for reorganization - Adjust for reorganization - Adjust for reorganization - Adjust for reorganization - Adjust for reorganization - Adjust for reorganization - Adjust for reorganization - Adjust for reorganization - Adjust for reorganization - Adjust for reorganization - Adjust for reorganization - Adjust for reorganization - Adjust for reorganization - Adjust for reorganization - Adjust for reorganization - Adjust for reorganization - Adjust for reorganization - Adjust for reorganization - Adjust for reorganization - Adjust for reorganization - Increase for several high cost abatements - Adjust for reorganization - Adjust for reorganization - Adjust for reorganization - Adjust for reorganization - Adjust for reorganization - Adjust for reorganization - Adjust for reorganization - Adjust for reorganization - Adjust for reorganization - Adjust for reorganization - Adjust for reorganization - Adjust for reorganization - Adjust for reorganization - Adjust for reorganization 1,500 (75) 1,425 2,650 6,300 8,950 524,399 9,358 533,757 227,180 (12,494) 214,686 600 1,200 1,800 0 4,400 4,400 0 900 900 0 93,000 93,000 0 46,930 46,930 0 2,500 2,500 0 101,000 101,000 0 600 600 0 1,000 1,000 0 24,000 24,000 0 200 200 0 1,000 1,000 203,628 (80,000) 123,628 105,236 (50,010) 55,226 0 1,000 1,000 0 3,150 3,150 25,000 475,000 500,000 1,046,985 (125,744) 921,241 491,426 (81,734) 409,692 6,000 (2,400) 3,600 6,000 (1,000) 5,000 5,000 (2,250) 2,750 23,000 (1,575) 21,425 275,028 (275,028) 0 126,570 (126,570) 0 5,000 (5,000) 0 600 (600) 0 500 (500) 0 1,500 (1,500) 0 11,000 (11,000) 0 40,000 (40,000) 0 Page 3 of 6 P:\Finance\2022 Budget\Budget AmendmentWmendment #1 \2022 05 24 Public Hearing & 1st Reading\2022 Amendment No 1 Detail v2 for RCA CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA 2022 Budget - Amendment #1 Line Item Detail 5/24/2022 Account Description Account Number Description / Justification Initial Budget Amendment Amended Budget #001 - General Fund - continued Recurring Expenditures -continued Legal Notices - Building Hearing Examiner - Building Postage - Building Travel/Mileage - Building 001.040.043.558.60.41.18 001.040.043.558.60.41.54 001.040.043.558.60.42.01 001.040.043.558.60.43.01 Copier Maintenance - Building 001.040.043.558.60.48.02 Software Licenses & Maintenance - Bldg 001.040.043.558.60.48.03 Subscriptions - Building 001.040.043.558.60.49.01 Memberships - Building 001.040.043.558.60.49.02 Printing & Binding - Building 001.040.043.558.60.49.03 Registrations - Building 001.040.043.558.60.49.04 Filing & Recording Fees - Building 001.040.043.558.60.49.05 Salaries and Wages - Planning 001.040.044.558.60.10.00 Payroll Taxes & Benefits - Planning 001.040.044.558.60.20.00 Office Supplies - Planning 001.040.044.558.60.31.01 Publications - Planning 001.040.044.558.60.31.03 Meeting Supplies - Planning 001.040.044.558.60.31.05 Small Tools & Minor Equipment - Ping 001.040.044.558.60.35.01 Spokane County GIS - Planning 001.040.044.558.60.41.03 Professional Services - Planning 001.040.044.558.60.41.05 Legal Notices - Planning 001.040.044.558.60.41.18 Hearing Examiner - Planning 001.040.044.558.60.41.54 Postage - Planning 001.040.044.558.60.42.01 Travel/Mileage - Planning 001.040.044.558.60.43.01 Copier Maintenance - Planning 001.040.044.558.60.48.02 Software Licenses & Maintenance - Ping 001.040.044.558.60.48.03 Subscriptions - Planning Memberships - Planning Printing & Binding - Planning Registrations - Planning Filing & Recording Fees - Planning 001.040.044.558.60.49.01 001.040.044.558.60.49.02 001.040.044.558.60.49.03 001.040.044.558.60.49.04 001.040.044.558.60.49.05 - Adjust for reorganization - Adjust for reorganization - Adjust for reorganization - Adjust for reorganization - Adjust for reorganization - Adjust for reorganization - Adjust for reorganization - Adjust for reorganization - Adjust for reorganization - Adjust for reorganization - Adjust for reorganization - Adjust for reorganization - Adjust for reorganization - Adjust for reorganization - Adjust for reorganization - Adjust for reorganization - Adjust for reorganization - Adjust for reorganization - Adjust for reorganization - Adjust for reorganization - Adjust for reorganization - Adjust for reorganization - Adjust for reorganization - Adjust for reorganization - Adjust for reorganization - Adjust for reorganization - Adjust for reorganization - Adjust for reorganization - Adjust for reorganization - Adjust for reorganization Total recurring expenditures 30,000 (30,000) 0 40,000 (40,000) 0 2,000 (2,000) 0 1,500 (1,500) 0 3,000 (3,000) 0 18,000 (18,000) 0 300 (300) 0 2,100 (2,100) 0 500 (500) 0 1,500 (1,500) 0 20,000 (20,000) 0 0 476,532 476,532 0 193,315 193,315 0 6,200 6,200 0 600 600 0 500 500 0 1,500 1,500 0 8,708 8,708 0 40,000 40,000 0 30,000 30,000 0 40,000 40,000 0 2,000 2,000 0 1,500 1,500 0 4,350 4,350 0 10,125 10,125 0 300 300 0 2,100 2,100 0 500 500 0 1,500 1,500 0 20,000 20,000 686,706 Page 4 of 6 P:\Finance\2022 Budget\Budget AmendmentWmendment #1 \2022 05 24 Public Hearing & 1st Reading\2022 Amendment No 1 Detail v2 for RCA CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA 2022 Budget - Amendment #1 Line Item Detail 5/24/2022 Account Description Account Number Description / Justification Initial Budget Amendment Amended Budget #001 - General Fund - continued Nonrecurring Revenues Transfers in - #312 001.090.099.397.31.20 Nonrecurring Expenditures Transfer out - #122 Transfer out - #312 Professional Services & Construction 001.090.099.597.12.00.20 001.090.099.597.31.00.20 001.000.322.518.30. xx.xx #104 - Hotel/Motel Tax- Tourism Facilities Fund Revenues Transfers in - #105 - City Hall Repair Costs Total nonrecurring revenues - Replenish winter weather reserve - 2020 #001 fund bal > 50% - City Hall Repair Costs Total nonrecurring expenditures 0 700,000 700,000 700,000 0 89,805 0 3,593,000 0 700,000 4,382,805 Total of all General Fund revenues Total of all General Fund expenditures 517,000 5,069,511 104.000.000.397.10.50 - Transfer based on Council action in 2021 #105 - Hotel/Motel Tax Fund Expenditures Tourism Promotion Transfers out - #104 Total revenues 105.105.000.557.30.41.00 - Decrease for based on actual Council awards 105.105.000.597.10.00.40 - Transfer based on Council action in 2021 #122 - Winter Weather Reserve Fund Revenues Transfer in - #001 Total expenditures 122.122.000.397.00.10 - Replenish Winter Weather Reserve 89,805 3,593,000 700,000 0 273,000 273,000 571,000 273,000 (273,000) 298,000 0 273,000 273,000 0 0 89,805 89,805 Total revenues 89,805 Page 5 of 6 P:\Finance\2022 Budget\Budget AmendmentWmendment #1 \2022 05 24 Public Hearing & 1st Reading\2022 Amendment No 1 Detail v2 for RCA CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA 2022 Budget - Amendment #1 Line Item Detail 5/24/2022 Account Description Account Number Description / Justification Initial Budget Amendment Amended Budget #303 - Street Capital Projects Fund Revenues Grant Proceeds 303.000.343.331.21.01 - Coronavirus Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Total revenues Expenditures Buckeye Ave Sewer Extension 303.000.343.595.xx.xx.xx - 2022 Construction Costs (CLFR) I#310 - Civic Facilities Capital Projects Fund Expenditures Payment to Library District Total expenditures Payment to the Library District for joint 310.xxx.xxx.xxx.xx.xx.xx - improvement costs per MOU #312 -Capital Reserve Fund Revenues Transfer in - #001 0 750,000 750,000 750,000 0 750,000 750,000 750,000 0 560,000 560,000 Total expenditures 560,000 312.000.000.397.00.10 - 2020 #001 fund bal > 50% Total revenues Expenditures WSDOT Sullivan Park Property Acquisitic 312.000.000.594.76.61.00 - Final payment for property acquisition Transfer out - #001 312.000.000.597.00.00.10 - City Hall Repair Costs 0 3,593,000 3,593,000 3,593,000 0 759,600 759,600 0 700,000 700,000 Total expenditures 1,459,600 Totals Across all Funds Total revenues Total expenditures 5,222,805 7,839,111 Page 6 of 6 P:\Finance\2022 Budget\Budget Amendment\Amendment #1\2022 05 24 Public Hearing & 1st Reading\2022 Budget Summary for Amended Funds No 1 v2 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA 2022 Budget Amendment #001 - GENERAL FUND RECURRING ACTIVITY Revenues Property Tax Sales Tax Sales Tax - Public Safety Sales Tax - Criminal Justice Gambling Tax and Leasehold Excise Tax Franchise Fees/Business Registration State Shared Revenues Fines and Forfeitures/Public Safety Community and Public Works Recreation Program Revenues Grant Proceeds Miscellaneous Department Revenue Miscellaneous & Investment Interest Transfers in - #105 (h/m tax-CP advertising) Total Recurring Revenues Expenditures City Council 645,170 36,342 681,512 City Manager 1,466,305 (545,179) 921,126 City Attorney 747,890 (11,901) 735,989 Public Safety 29,804,434 0 29,804,434 Deputy City Manager 295,477 248,945 544,422 Finance 1,571,443 (324,463) 1,246,980 Human Resources 330,321 5,044 335,365 Information Technology 0 403,123 403,123 Facilities 400,020 0 400,020 Community & Public Works - Administration 0 302,228 302,228 Community & Public Works - Engineering 2,440,282 (96,096) 2,344,186 Community & Public Works - Building 2,631,423 (444,661) 2,186,762 Community & Public Works - Planning 0 839,730 839,730 Economic Development 1,188,268 273,594 1,461,862 Parks & Rec - Administration 351,018 0 351,018 Parks & Rec - Maintenance 950,455 0 950,455 Parks & Rec - Recreation 330,687 0 330,687 Parks & Rec - Aquatics 538,700 0 538,700 Parks & Rec - Senior Center 36,801 0 36,801 Parks & Rec - CenterPlace 970,375 0 970,375 General Government 1,703,713 0 1,703,713 Transfers out - #204 (2016 LTGO debt service) 401,400 0 401,400 Transfers out - #309 (park capital projects) 160,000 0 160,000 Transfers out - #311 (pavement preservation) 1,001,800 0 1,001,800 Transfers out - #502 (insurance premium) 450,000 0 450,000 2022 As Adopted Proposed Amendment As Amended 13,199,900 0 13,199,900 27,720,000 0 27,720,000 1,276,000 0 1,276,000 2,244,000 0 2,244,000 365,000 0 365,000 1,215,000 0 1,215,000 1,995,500 0 1,995,500 529,200 0 529,200 2,636,200 0 2,636,200 652,400 (23,000) 629,400 260,000 (160,000) 100,000 21,000 0 21,000 288,500 0 288,500 30,000 0 30,000 52,432,700 (183,000) 52,249,700 Total Recurring Expenditures 48,415,982 686,706 49,102,688 Recurring Revenues Over (Under) Recurring Expenditures 4,016,718 (869,706) 3,147,012 5/24/2022 Page 1 of 5 P:\Finance\2022 Budget\Budget Amendment\Amendment #1\2022 05 24 Public Hearing & 1st Reading\2022 Budget Summary for Amended Funds No 1 v2 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA 2022 Budget Amendment 2022 As Adopted Proposed Amendment As Amended #001 - GENERAL FUND - continued NONRECURRING ACTIVITY Revenues Transfers in - #312 (police vehicle replacements) 1,400,000 0 1,400,000 Transfers in - #312 (City Hall repair costs) 0 700,000 700,000 Total Nonrecurring Revenues Expenditures General Government - IT capital replacements 136,000 0 136,000 City Manager (office furniture for Project Manager employe( 5,000 0 5,000 Public Safety (2 radar trailers) 24,000 0 24,000 Public Safety (vehicle for homeless services officer) 55,000 0 55,000 Public Safety (replace carpet at Precinct) 25,000 0 25,000 Public Safety (repaint Precinct exterior) 50,000 0 50,000 Public Safety (tree & debris removal from back lot) 8,000 0 8,000 Public Safety (police vehicle replacements) 1,400,000 0 1,400,000 Parks & Rec (repaint portico at CenterPlace) 12,000 0 12,000 Parks & Rec (replace carpet at CenterPlace) 26,700 0 26,700 Parks & Rec (repair plumbing systems at pools) 30,000 0 30,000 Financial Software Capital Costs 1,000,000 0 1,000,000 City Hall Repairs 0 700,000 700,000 Transfers out - #101 (Street Fund operations) 2,820,419 0 2,820,419 Transfers out - #122 (replenish reserve) 0 89,805 89,805 Transfers out - #312 ('20 fund bal >50%) 0 3,593,000 3,593,000 Transfers out - #501 (vehicle for Code Enf Supervisor) 40,000 0 40,000 1,400,000 700,000 2,100,000 Total Nonrecurring Expenditures 5,632,119 4,382,805 10,014,924 Nonrecurring Revenues Over (Under) Nonrecurring Expenditures Excess (Deficit) of Total Revenues Over (Under) Total Expenditures Beginning unrestricted fund balance Ending unrestricted fund balance Fund balance as a percent of recurring expenditures (4,232,119) (3,682,805) (7,914,924) (215,401) (4,552,511) (4,767,912) 44,206,845 44,206,845 43,991,444 39,438,933 90.86% 80.32% 5/24/2022 Page 2 of 5 P:\Finance\2022 Budget\Budget Amendment\Amendment #1\2022 05 24 Public Hearing & 1st Reading\2022 Budget Summary for Amended Funds No 1 v2 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA 2022 Budget Amendment 2022 As Adopted Proposed Amendment As Amended SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS #104 - HOTEL / MOTEL TAX - TOURISM FACILITIES FUND Revenues Hotel/Motel Tax 400,000 0 400,000 Investment Interest 2,500 0 2,500 Transfers in - #105 0 273,000 273,000 Total revenues Expenditures Capital Outlay Total expenditures 402,500 273,000 675,500 0 0 0 0 0 0 Revenues over (under) expenditures 402,500 675,500 Beginning fund balance 4,672,194 4,672,194 Ending fund balance 5,074,694 5,347,694 #105 - HOTEL / MOTEL TAX FUND Revenues Hotel/Motel Tax Investment Interest 600,000 1,000 0 600,000 0 1,000 Total revenues 601,000 0 601,000 Expenditures Transfers out - #001 30,000 0 30,000 Transfers out - #104 0 273,000 273,000 Tourism Promotion 571,000 (273,000) 298,000 Total expenditures 601,000 0 601,000 Revenues over (under) expenditures 0 0 Beginning fund balance 165,000 165,000 Ending fund balance 165,000 165,000 #122 - WINTER WEATHER RESERVE FUND Revenues Investment Interest 800 0 800 Transfers in - #001 0 89,805 89,805 Total revenues Expenditures Street maintenance expenditures Transfers out - #101 Total expenditures 800 89,805 90,605 500,000 0 0 500,000 0 0 500,000 0 500,000 Revenues over (under) expenditures (499,200) (409,395) Beginning fund balance 434,887 434,887 Ending fund balance (64,313) 25,492 5/24/2022 Page 3 of 5 P:\Finance\2022 Budget\Budget Amendment\Amendment #1\2022 05 24 Public Hearing & 1st Reading\2022 Budget Summary for Amended Funds No 1 v2 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA 2022 Budget Amendment CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS #303 - STREET CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND Revenues Grant Proceeds Developer Transfers in - #301 Transfers in - #302 Transfers in - #312 Transfers in - #315 Total revenues 2022 As Adopted Proposed Amendment As Amended 6,956,322 750,000 7,706,322 1,164,399 0 1,164,399 361,780 0 361,780 1,113,649 0 1,113,649 225,000 0 225,000 150,000 0 150,000 9,971,150 750,000 10,721,150 Expenditures 205 Sprague/Barker Intersections Improvement 1,871,500 0 1,871,500 249 Sullivan/Wellesley Intersection 1,903,176 0 1,903,176 267 Mission Ave Sidewalk 0 0 0 275 Barker Rd Widening - River to Euclid 0 0 0 285 Indiana Ave Pres - Evergreen to Sullivan 0 0 0 293 2018 CSS Citywide Reflective Signal BP 8,250 0 8,250 294 Citywide Reflective Signal Post Panels 3,575 0 3,575 299 Argonne Rd Concrete Pvmt Indiana to Mont 130,017 0 130,017 300 Pines and Mission Intersection Improvement 1,746,643 0 1,746,643 301 Park and Mission Intersection Improvements 0 0 0 310 Sullivan Rd Overcrossing UP RR Deck Repl 0 0 0 313 Barker Rd/Union Pacific Crossing 1,444,000 0 1,444,000 318 Wilbur Sidewalk - Boone to Mission 572,909 0 572,909 320 Sullivan Preservation - Sprague to 8th 412,000 0 412,000 326 2020 Citywide Retroreflective Post Plates 142,880 0 142,880 329 Barker Road Imp- City Limits to Appleway 250,000 0 250,000 343 Buckeye Ave Sewer Extenstion 0 750,000 750,000 Mission Ave over Evergreen Deck Repair 261,200 0 261,200 School zone beacons 225,000 0 225,000 Contingency 1,000,000 0 1,000,000 Total expenditures 9,971,150 750,000 10,721,150 Revenues over (under) expenditures 0 0 Beginning fund balance 67,620 67,620 Ending fund balance 67,620 67,620 5/24/2022 Page 4 of 5 P:\Finance\2022 Budget\Budget Amendment\Amendment #1\2022 05 24 Public Hearing & 1st Reading\2022 Budget Summary for Amended Funds No 1 v2 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA 2022 Budget Amendment CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS - continued #310 - CIVIC FACILITIES CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND Revenues Investment Interest Total revenues Expenditures Payment to Library District Total expenditures Revenues over (under) expenditures Beginning fund balance Ending fund balance 2022 As Adopted Proposed Amendment As Amended 1,300 0 1,300 1,300 0 1,300 0 560,000 560,000 0 560,000 560,000 1,300 840,056 (558,700) 840,056 841,356 281,356 #312 - CAPITAL RESERVE FUND Revenues Transfers in - #001 ('20 fund bal >50%) 0 3,593,000 3,593,000 Investment Interest 10,000 0 10,000 Total revenues 10,000 3,593,000 3,603,000 Expenditures Transfers out - #001 (police vehicle replacements) 1,400,000 0 1,400,000 Transfers out - #001 (City Hall repair costs) 0 700,000 700,000 Transfers out - #303 (school zone beacons) 225,000 0 225,000 Transfers out - #309 (Balfour Park Improvements Ph. 1) 3,507,520 0 3,507,520 Transfers out - #309 (Sullivan Park water line) 314,900 0 314,900 Transfers out - #309 (Spokane Valley River Loop Trail) 700,000 0 700,000 Transfers out - #314 (Barker Rd Overpass) 724,905 0 724,905 Transfers out - #314 (Sullivan Rd Interchange) 101,385 0 101,385 Transfers out - #316 (Fairgrounds Building) 750,000 0 750,000 WSDOT Sullivan Park Property Acquisition 0 759,600 759,600 Total expenditures 7,723,710 1,459,600 9,183,310 Revenues over (under) expenditures (7,713,710) (5,580,310) Beginning fund balance 14,522,386 14,522,386 Ending fund balance 6,808,676 8,942,076 5/24/2022 Page 5 of 5 Appendix A EMPLOYEE POSITION CLASSIFICATION MONTHLY SALARY SCHEDULE Effective January 1, 2022 Position Title Grade 2022 Range City Manager Unclassified Deputy City Manager 22 11,920.14 - 17,277.75 City Attorney 21 10,738.86 - 15,550.10 Finance Director 21 10,738.86 - 15,550.10 Community & Public Works Director 21 10,738.86 - 15,550.10 Parks, Recreation, and Facilities Director 20 9,664.85 - 13,996.12 City Engineer 20 9,664.85 - 13,996.12 Economic Development Director 20 9,664.85 - 13,996.12 Human Resources Director 20 9,664.85 - 13,996.12 Senior Deputy City Attorney 19 8,698.21 - 12,596.64 kluman Rccourcce Managcr 4g 8,608.21 12,506.64 Building Official 19 7,829.40 - 11,336.42 Planning Manager 18 7,829.40 - 11,336.42 Engineering Manager 18 7,829.40 - 11,336.42 Traffic Engineering Manager 18 7,829.40 - 11,336.42 Economic Development Manager 48. 7,829.410 11,336.412 Senior Engineer 17 7,046.06 - 10,202.36 Accounting Manager 17 7,046.06 - 10,202.36 Assistant Building Official 17 7,046.06 - 10,202.36 Public Works Superintendent 17 7,046.06 - 10,202.36 Senior Administrative Analyst 17 7,046.06 - 10,202.36 IT Manager 17 7,046.06 - 10,202.36 Legislative Coordinator 16 6,340.81 - 9,181.53 Deputy City Attorney 16 6,340.81 - 9,181.53 City Clerk 16 6,340.81 - 9,181.53 Engineer 16 6,340.81 - 9,181.53 Senior Planner 16 6,340.81 - 9,181.53 Development Services Coordinator 16 6,340.81 - 9,181.53 Database Administrator 16 6,340.81 - 9,181.53 Accountant/Budget Analyst 16 6,340.81 - 9,181.53 Housing and Homeless Services Coordinator 16 6,340.81 - 9,181.53 Project Manager 16 6,340.81 - 9,181.53 CAD Manager 16 6,340.81 - 9,181.53 Code Enforcement Supervisor 16 6,340.81 - 9,181.53 Associate Planner 15 5,707.52 - 8,263.95 Assistant Engineer 15 5,707.52 - 8,263.95 IT Specialist 15 5,707.52 - 8,263.95 Engineering Technician II 15 5,707.52 - 8,263.95 Communications and Marketing Officer 15 5,707.52 - 8,263.95 Economic Development Project Specialist 15 5,707.52 - 8,263.95 Senior Plans Examiner 15 5,707.52 - 8,263.95 Public Information Officer 15 5,707.52 - 8,263.95 Administrative Analyst 15 5,707.52 - 8,263.95 Maintenance/Construction Foreman 15 5,707.52 - 8,263.95 GIS Analyst 15 5,707.52 8,263.95 Mechanic 14 5,137.08 - 7,438.13 Human Resource Analyst 14 5,137.08 - 7,438.13 CenterPlace Coordinator 14 5,137.08 - 7,438.13 Planner 14 5,137.08 - 7,438.13 Building Inspector II 14 5,137.08 - 7,438.13 Plans Examiner 14 5,137.08 - 7,438.13 Engineering Technician I 14 5,137.08 - 7,438.13 Senior Permit Specialist 14 5,137.08 - 7,438.13 Code Enforcement Officer 14 5,137.08 - 7,438.13 Maintenance/Construction Inspector 14 5,137.08 - 7,438.13 Recreation Coordinator 13 4,623.00 - 6,694.06 Deputy City Clerk 13 4,623.00 - 6,694.06 Customer Relations/Facilities Coordinator 13 4,623.00 - 6,694.06 Building Inspector I 13 4,623.00 - 6,694.06 Executive Assistant 13 4,623.00 - 6,694.06 Planning Technician 13 4,623.00 - 6,694.06 Human Resources Technician 13 4,623.00 - 6,694.06 Senior Center Specialist 12 4,162.22 - 6,024.50 Permit Facilitator 12 4,162.22 - 6,024.50 Help Desk Technician 12 4,162.22 - 6,024.50 Accounting Technician 12 4,162.22 - 6,024.50 Administrative Assistant 12 4,162.22 - 6,024.50 Recreation Specialist 12 4,162.22 - 6,024.50 Maintenance Worker 11-12 3,744.85 - 6,024.50 Permit Specialist 11 3,744.85 - 5,422.31 Office Assistant II 10-11 3,370.14 - 5,422.31 Custodian 10 3,370.14 - 4,878.94 Office Assistant I 9-10 3,033.50 - 4,878.94 Note : Slight rounding differences may exist between the figures reflected on this page and the actual payroll rates computed by the Eden Payroll System. CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: May 24, 2022 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ['consent ❑ old business ® new business ['public hearing ['information ['admin. report ['pending legislation ['executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: First reading of proposed Ordinance #22-008 which amends the 2022 Budget. GOVERNING LEGISLATION: In order for the City to amend an adopted budget, State law requires the Council to approve an ordinance that appropriates additional funds. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: The Council last took formal action on the 2022 Budget when it was adopted on November 9, 2021. On May 3, 2022, an Administrative Report was delivered to Council regarding the need for a budget amendment. Finally, earlier this evening a public hearing was held on this topic. BACKGROUND: Since the initial adoption of the 2022 Budget on November 9, 2021, a number of events have transpired in the normal course of operations that necessitate a 2022 Budget amendment. The proposed amendments include: #001 - General Fund The total of recurring and nonrecurring revenues reflect an increase of $517,000, which is comprised of: • Grant proceeds are decreased by $160,000 to reflect the actual HHAA funds awarded to the City. • $23,000 decrease in Parks and Recreation revenues due to updated estimates for 2022. • $700,000 increase in nonrecurring transfers in from the Capital Reserve Fund #312 for costs related to repairs of City Hall. Council approved these expenditures at the May 3, 2022 Council meeting. Provide additional appropriations (expenditures) of $5,069,511 comprised of: • $36,342 increase in salaries, payroll taxes, and benefits costs for the City Council Department related to increased councilmember salaries from the Salary Commission effective April 19, 2022. • A net $0 change in the City Council Department to move the Mayor's travel budget to the appropriate position number. • $55,813 increase in salaries and related payroll taxes and benefits in the City Facilities Department to add a custodian position for City Hall. This position was approved by Council at the December 14, 2021 Council meeting. • $55,813 decrease in janitorial services in the City Facilities Department to account for the hiring of an in-house custodian. • $475,000 increase in code enforcement abatement costs in the Building Department due to several high -cost abatements that have either occurred or are planned in 2022. • A net $175,364 increase across various City Departments due to a reorganization that occurred in early 2022. This reorganization included the addition of one new FTE for a Community and Public Works Director, which was approved by Council at the February 15, 2022 Council meeting. • $89,805 to replenish the Winter Weather Reserve Fund #122 back to a fund balance of $500,000. The Street O&M Fund was over budget on snow removal expenditures in 2021 by about $89,805. • $3,593,000 transferred to Capital Reserve Fund #312 which represents the 2020 yearend fund balance in excess of 50% of recurring expenditures. • $700,000 in additional City Hall repair costs. Council approved these expenditures at the May 3, 2022 Council meeting. #104 — Hotel/Motel Tax — Tourism Facilities Fund $273,000 increase in transfers in from the Hotel/Motel Tax Fund #105. This increase reflects a Council motion on December 14, 2021, as part of the lodging tax grant process for the 2022 awards. #105 — Hotel / Motel Tax Fund Net change of $0 in expenditures; however, transfers out to the Hotel / Motel Tax — Tourism Facilities Fund #104 are increased by $273,000 and tourism promotion costs are reduced by $273,000, as was approved during the lodging tax process at the December 14, 2021 Council meeting. #122 — Winter Weather Reserve Fund Revenues are increased by $89,805 reflecting a transfer in from the General Fund #001 to replenish the fund balance to $500,000. The Street O&M Fund was over budget on snow removal expenditures in 2021 by about $89,805, which was reimbursed to Fund #101 from Fund #122 during that year. #303 — Street Capital Projects Fund Revenues and expenditures are proposed to increase by $750,000 to add construction for the Buckeye Ave. Sewer Extension project. This is funded through an allocation of CLFR funds as authorized by Council at the April 19, 2022 Council meeting. #310 — Civic Facilities Capital Projects Fund Expenditures are increased by $560,000 for the City's contribution to the joint improvement costs of the new library being constructed adjacent to Balfour Park as outlined in the Memorandum of Understanding with the Library District. #312 — Capital Reserve Fund Revenues are increased due to a transfer of $3,593,000 from General Fund #001 which represents the 2020 yearend fund balance in excess of 50% of recurring expenditures. Expenditures are increased by $1,459,600 comprised of $759,600 for the amount still owing for the purchase of the WSDOT property adjacent to Sullivan Park and $700,000 in transfers out to the General Fund #001 for repair costs for City Hall. The 2022 Budget amendment also includes changes to the Employee Position Classification Monthly Salary Schedule to incorporate various changes from the City's reorganization, including the addition of the new Community and Public Works Director position. The 2022 Budget amendment reflects the changes noted above and will affect 6 funds resulting in total revenue increases of $5,222,805 and expenditure increases of $7,839,111. Revenue Expenditure Fund Fund Increase Increase No. Name (Decrease) (Decrease) 001 General Fund 104 Hotel/Motel Tax - Tourism Facilities Fund 105 Hotel/Motel Tax Fund 122 Winter Weather Reserve Fund 303 Street Capital Projects Fund 310 Civic Facilities Capital Projects Fund 312 Capital Reserve Fund 517,000 5,069,511 273,000 0 0 0 89,805 0 750,000 750,000 0 560,000 3,593,000 1,459,600 5,222,805 7,839,111 OPTIONS: Options are to accept the proposed amendments in whole or in -part. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to advance Ordinance #22-008 amending the 2022 Budget to a second reading. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: This action amends the estimated revenues and appropriations for the 2022 Budget that was adopted on November 9, 2021. There are adequate funds available to pay for these amendments. STAFF CONTACT: Chelsie Taylor, Finance Director ATTACHMENTS: • Draft Ordinance #22-008 DRAFT CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 22-008 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON, AMENDING ORDINANCE 21-018, WHICH ADOPTED A BUDGET FOR THE PERIOD JANUARY 1, 2022 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2022; AND OTHER MATTERS RELATED THERETO. WHEREAS, the City Council approved Ordinance 21-018 on November 9, 2021, which adopted the 2022 annual budget; and WHEREAS, subsequent to the November 9, 2021 adoption of the 2022 annual budget, it has become necessary to make changes by adding new revenue, appropriations, amendments, and transferring funds in order to properly perform City functions, services and activities; and WHEREAS, certain changes to employee positions have been made by the City Manager, which necessitate changes to the Employee Position Classification Monthly Salary Schedule that was included in the 2022 annual budget; and WHEREAS, certain changes were necessary to the salaries for Councilmembers, and salaries and wages for employees from what were included in the adopted 2022 annual budget; and WHEREAS, the budget changes set forth in this Ordinance could not have been reasonably anticipated or known when the 2022 annual budget was passed by the City Council; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the best interests of the City are served by amending the 2022 budget to reflect unanticipated revenue, expenditures, transfers, and appropriating the same as set forth herein. NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley, Washington do ordain as follows: Section 1. Amended Revenues and Appropriations. Ordinance No. 21-018 adopted a budget for the twelve months beginning January 1, 2022 and ending December 31, 2022. Each item, revenue, appropriation, and fund contained in Section 1 of Ordinance 21-018 is hereby further amended as set forth in Attachment A to this Ordinance, which is incorporated herein. Section 2. Amended Employee Position Classification Monthly Salary Schedule. Ordinance No. 21-018 adopted an Employee Position Classification Monthly Salary Schedule as part of the budget for the twelve months beginning January 1, 2022 and ending December 31, 2022. The schedule is hereby amended as set forth in Attachment B to this Ordinance, which is incorporated herein. Section 3. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance. Section 4. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect five days after publication of this Ordinance or a summary thereof in the official newspaper of the City as provided by law. Ordinance 22-008 amending the 2022 budget Page 1 of 4 Passed by the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley this day of May 2022. ATTEST: Pam Haley, Mayor Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Approved as to form: Office of the City Attorney Date of Publication: Effective Date: Ordinance 22-008 amending the 2022 budget Page 2 of 4 ATTACHMENT A Sources Uses Fund No. Annual Appropriation Funds Be ginning Fund Balance Revenues Total Sources Appropriations Estimated Ending Fund Balance Adopted via Ord. 21-018 Amended via Ord. 22-008 Total Revenues Adopted via Ord. 21-018 Amended via Ord. 22-008 Total Appropriations 001 General 44,206,845 53,832,700 517,000 54,349,700 98,556,545 54,048,101 5,069,511 59,117,612 39,438,933 101 Street O&M 1,156,301 5,874,119 0 5,874,119 7,030,420 6,039,619 0 6,039,619 990,801 103 Paths & Trails 29,558 8,100 0 8,100 37,658 0 0 0 37,658 104 Hotel/Motel Tax - Tourism Facilities 4,672,194 402,500 273,000 675,500 5,347,694 0 0 0 5,347,694 105 Hotel/Motel Tax 165,000 601,000 0 601,000 766,000 601,000 0 601,000 165,000 106 Solid Waste 1,140,119 1,832,000 0 1,832,000 2,972,119 1,832,000 0 1,832,000 1,140,119 107 PEG 165,895 79,000 0 79,000 244,895 73,000 0 73,000 171,895 108 Affordable & Supportive Housing Sales Tax 367,327 193,000 0 193,000 560,327 0 0 0 560,327 120 CenterPlace Operating Reserve 300,000 0 0 0 300,000 0 0 0 300,000 121 Service Level Stabilization 5,500,000 0 0 0 5,500,000 0 0 0 5,500,000 122 Winter Weather Reserve 434,887 800 89,805 90,605 525,492 500,000 0 500,000 25,492 204 Debt Service LTGO 03 0 1,064,800 0 1,064,800 1,064,800 1,064,800 0 1,064,800 0 301 Capital Projects 3,958,748 1,502,000 0 1,502,000 5,460,748 1,357,780 0 1,357,780 4,102,968 302 Special Capital Projects 5,230,856 1,505,000 0 1,505,000 6,735,856 2,109,649 0 2,109,649 4,626,207 303 Street Capital Projects 67,620 9,971,150 750,000 10,721,150 10,788,770 9,971,150 750,000 10,721,150 67,620 309 Parks Capital Projects 25,262 4,808,520 0 4,808,520 4,833,782 4,728,520 0 4,728,520 105,262 310 Civic Facilities Capital Projects 840,056 1,300 0 1,300 841,356 0 560,000 560,000 281,356 311 Pavement Preservation 5,544,088 5,460,600 0 5,460,600 11,004,688 7,252,000 0 7,252,000 3,752,688 312 Capital Reserve 14,522,386 10,000 3,593,000 3,603,000 18,125,386 7,723,710 1,459,600 9,183,310 8,942,076 314 Railroad Grade Separation Projects 589,792 2,695,172 0 2,695,172 3,284,964 2,775,263 0 2,775,263 509,701 315 Transportation Impact Fees 294,607 200,000 0 200,000 494,607 150,000 0 150,000 344,607 316 Economic Development Capital Projects 0 750,000 0 750,000 750,000 750,000 0 750,000 0 89,211,541 90,791,761 5,222,805 96,014,566 185,226,107 100,976,592 7,839,111 108,815,703 76,410,404 Sources Uses Revenues Appropriations Estimated Be ginning Ending Fund Working Adopted via Amended via Total Total Adopted via Amended via Total Working No. Working Capital Funds Capital Ord. 21-018 Ord. 22-008 Revenues Sources Ord. 21-018 Ord. 22-008 Appropriations Capital 402 Stormwater Management 2,401,719 1,912,000 0 1,912,000 4,313,719 2,443,926 0 2,443,926 1,869,793 403 Aquifer Protection Area 442,940 2,343,500 0 2,343,500 2,786,440 3,063,800 0 3,063,800 (277,360) 501 Equipment Rental & Replacement 1,425,472 230,000 0 230,000 1,655,472 522,500 0 522,500 1,132,972 502 Risk Management 392,820 450,000 0 450,000 842,820 450,000 0 450,000 392,820 632 Passthrough Fees & Taxes 0 400,000 0 400,000 400,000 400,000 0 400,000 0 4,662,951 5,335,500 0 5,335,500 9,998,451 6,880,226 0 6,880,226 3,118,225 Total of all Funds 93,874,492 96,127,261 5,222,805 101,350,066 195,224,558 107,856,818 7,839,111 115,695,929 79,528,629 Ordinance 22-008 amending the 2022 budget Page 3 of 4 ATTACHMENT B EMPLOYEE POSITION CLASSIFICATION MONTHLY SALARY SCHEDULE Effective January 1, 2022 Position Title Grade 2022 Range City Manager Unclassified Deputy City Manager 22 11,920.14 - 17,277.75 City Attorney 21 10,738.86 - 15,550.10 Finance Director 21 10,738.86 - 15,550.10 Community & Public Works Director 21 10,738.86 - 15,550.10 Parks, Recreation, and Facilities Director 20 9,664.85 - 13,996.12 City Engineer 20 9,664.85 - 13,996.12 Economic Development Director 20 9,664.85 - 13,996.12 Human Resources Director 20 9,664.85 - 13,996.12 Senior Deputy City Attorney 19 8,698.21 - 12,596.64 Building Official 19 7,829.40 - 11,336.42 Planning Manager 18 7,829.40 - 11,336.42 Engineering Manager 18 7,829.40 - 11,336.42 Traffic Engineering Manager 18 7,829.40 - 11,336.42 Senior Engineer 17 7,046.06 - 10,202.36 Accounting Manager 17 7,046.06 - 10,202.36 Assistant Building Official 17 7,046.06 - 10,202.36 Public Works Superintendent 17 7,046.06 - 10,202.36 Senior Administrative Analyst 17 7,046.06 - 10,202.36 IT Manager 17 7,046.06 - 10,202.36 Legislative Coordinator 16 6,340.81 - 9,181.53 Deputy City Attorney 16 6,340.81 - 9,181.53 City Clerk 16 6,340.81 - 9,181.53 Engineer 16 6,340.81 - 9,181.53 Senior Planner 16 6,340.81 - 9,181.53 Development Services Coordinator 16 6,340.81 - 9,181.53 Database Administrator 16 6,340.81 - 9,181.53 Accountant/BudgetAnalyst 16 6,340.81 - 9,181.53 Housing and Homeless Services Coordinator 16 6,340.81 - 9,181.53 Project Manager 16 6,340.81 - 9,181.53 CAD Manager 16 6,340.81 - 9,181.53 Code Enforcement Supervisor 16 6,340.81 - 9,181.53 Associate Planner 15 5,707.52 - 8,263.95 Assistant Engineer 15 5,707.52 - 8,263.95 IT Specialist 15 5,707.52 - 8,263.95 Engineering Technician II 15 5,707.52 - 8,263.95 Communications and Marketing Officer 15 5,707.52 - 8,263.95 Economic Development Project Specialist 15 5,707.52 - 8,263.95 Senior Plans Examiner 15 5,707.52 - 8,263.95 Public Information Officer 15 5,707.52 - 8,263.95 Administrative Analyst 15 5,707.52 - 8,263.95 Maintenance/Construction Foreman 15 5,707.52 - 8,263.95 GIS Analyst 15 5,707.52 8,263.95 Mechanic 14 5,137.08 - 7,438.13 Human Resource Analyst 14 5,137.08 - 7,438.13 CenterPlace Coordinator 14 5,137.08 - 7,438.13 Planner 14 5,137.08 - 7,438.13 Building Inspector II 14 5,137.08 - 7,438.13 Plans Examiner 14 5,137.08 - 7,438.13 Engineering Technician I 14 5,137.08 - 7,438.13 Senior Permit Specialist 14 5,137.08 - 7,438.13 Code Enforcement Officer 14 5,137.08 - 7,438.13 Maintenance/Construction Inspector 14 5,137.08 - 7,438.13 Recreation Coordinator 13 4,623.00 - 6,694.06 Deputy City Clerk 13 4,623.00 - 6,694.06 Customer Relations/Facilities Coordinator 13 4,623.00 - 6,694.06 Building Inspector I 13 4,623.00 - 6,694.06 Executive Assistant 13 4,623.00 - 6,694.06 Planning Technician 13 4,623.00 - 6,694.06 Human Resources Technician 13 4,623.00 - 6,694.06 Senior Center Specialist 12 4,162.22 - 6,024.50 Permit Facilitator 12 4,162.22 - 6,024.50 Help Desk Technician 12 4,162.22 - 6,024.50 Accounting Technician 12 4,162.22 - 6,024.50 Administrative Assistant 12 4,162.22 - 6,024.50 Recreation Specialist 12 4,162.22 - 6,024.50 Maintenance Worker 11-12 3,744.85 - 6,024.50 Permit Specialist 11 3,744.85 - 5,422.31 Office Assistant II 10-11 3,370.14 - 5,422.31 Custodian 10 3,370.14 - 4,878.94 Office Assistant I 9-10 3,033.50 - 4,878.94 Note: Slight rounding differences may exist betvteen the figures reflected on this page and the actual payroll rates computed by the Eden Payroll System. Ordinance 22-008 amending the 2022 budget Page 4 of 4 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: May 24 2022 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ® consent ❑ old business ❑ new business AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Approval of the Following Vouchers: ❑ public hearing VOUCHER LIST 05/04/2022 05/04/2022 05/05/2022 05/06/2022 05/10/2022 05/10/2022 05/12/2022 05/12/2022 05/13/2022 VOUCHER NUMBERS 56679-56690 Park refunds 9286-9290 56691-56732 56733 Payroll 7905-7926 Park refunds 9291-9294 56734 56735-56759, wire 16525311 56760-56794 GRAND TOTAL: TOTAL AMOUNT 3,064.03 697.00 285,472.65 2,751.67 409,342.87 300.00 7,962.50 609,207.10 58,021.58 $1,376,819.40 Explanation of Fund Numbers found on Voucher Lists #001 - General Fund 001.011.000.511. City Council 001.013.000.513. City Manager 001.013.015.515. Legal 001.016.000. Public Safety 001.018.013.513. Deputy City Manager 001.018.014.514. Finance 001.018.016.518. Human Resources 001.040.041. Engineering 001.040.042. Economic Development 001.040.043. Building 001.076.000.576. Parks & Rec—Administration 001.076.300.576. Parks & Rec-Maintenance 001.076.301.571. Parks & Rec-Recreation 001.076.302.576. Parks & Rec- Aquatics 001,076,304.575. Parks & Rec- Senior Center 001.076.305.571. Parks & Rec-CenterPlace 001.090.000.511. General Gov't- Council related 001.090.000.514. General Gov't -Finance related 001.090.000.517. General Gov't -Employee supply 001.090.000.518. General Gov't- Centralized Serv. 001.090.000.519. General Gov't -Other Services 001.090.000.540. General Gov't -Transportation 001.090.000.550. General Gov't -Natural & Eco. 001.090.000.560. General Gov't -Social Services 001.090.000.594 General Gov't -Capital Outlay 001.090.000.595. General Gov't -Pavement Preserv. Other Funds: 101 — Street Fund 103 — Paths & Trails 105 — Hotel/Motel Tax 106 — Solid Waste 107 —PEG Fund 108 — Affordable & Supplemental Housing Sales Tax 120 — CenterPlace Operating Reserve 121— Service Level Stabilization Reserve 122 — Winter Weather Reserve 204 —Debt Service 301 —REET 1 Capital Projects 302 — REET 2 Capital Projects 303 — Street Capital Projects 309 — Parks Capital Grants 310 — Civic Bldg. Capital Projects 311 — Pavement Preservation 312 — Capital Reserve 314 — Railroad Grade Separation. Projects 315 — Transportation Impact Fees 316 — Economic Development Capital Projects 402 — Stormwater Management 403 — Aquifer Protection Area 501 — Equipment Rental & Replacement 502 — Risk Management 632 — Passthrough Fees & Taxes RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to approve attached list of claim vouchers. [Approved as part of the Consent Agenda, or may be removed and discussed separately.] STAFF CONTACT: Chelsie Taylor, Finance Director ATTACHMENTS: Voucher Lists vchlist 05/0412022 7:38:38AM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: 1 Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept 56679 5/4/2022 000571 CODE PUBLISHING COMPANY 56680 5/4/2022 001137 COLLIER, BRANT 56681 514/2022 000746 EMPLOYMENT SECURITY DEPT 56682 5/4/2022 003274 EXCHANGE PUBLISHING LLC 56683 5/4/2022 001447 FREE PRESS PUBLISHING INC 56684 5/4/2022 008551 GOPHER LLC 56685 5/4/2022 002684 HINSHAW, CARI 56686 51412022 008589 KANALLY, JERI 56687 5/4/2022 001944 LANCER LTD GC0006852 EXPENSES 01-2022 636374 636376 637087 637784 637786 637787 637788 637789 52818 52819 52846 52847 52848 52849 6564 Expenses CSV REFUND 0482577 001.013.000.513 101.000.000.542 101.000.000.517 001.013.000.513 001.040.043.558 001.040.043.558 001.013.000.513 001.040.043.55B 001.040.043.558 001.040.043.558 001.040.043.558 001.013.000.513 001.040.043.558 001.013.000.513 001.040.043.558 001.040.043.558 001.040.043.558 001.013.015.515 001.018.014.514 001.000.000.321 001.013.015.515 Description/Account Amount ELECTRONIC CODE UPDATE EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT Q1-2022 UI TAX LEGAL PUBLICATION LEGAL PUBLICATION LEGAL PUBLICATION LEGAL PUBLICATION LEGAL PUBLICATION LEGAL PUBLICATION LEGAL PUBLICATION LEGAL PUBLICATION LEGAL PUBLICATION LEGAL PUBLICATION LEGAL PUBLICATION LEGAL PUBLICATION LEGAL PUBLICATION LEGAL PUBLICATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT Total: Total : Total: Total : Total: Total : Total : CSV ENDORSEMENT FEE REFUND Total: 223.46 223.46 104.25 104.25 255.65 255.65 45.82 91.64 84.53 25.28 83.74 87.69 57.67 85.32 561.69 54.40 102.85 29.75 97.75 100.30 64.60 449.65 75.40 75.40 27.50 27.50 25,00 25.00 BUSINESS CARDS/ENVELOPES 665.43 Page: 1 ,rchlist Voucher List Page: 2 05/04/2022 7:38:38AM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 56687 5/4/2022 001944 001944 LANCER LTD (Continued) Total : 665.43 56688 5/4/2022 008588 LANZCE DOUGLASS INVESTMENTS SUB-2022-0002 001.229.45.00 PERMIT REFUND: SUB-2022-0002 PRE 230.00 Total : 230.00 56689 514/2022 004850 NAVIA BENEFIT SOLUTIONS, HRA PLAN 10457525 001.018.016.518 FLEX SPENDING ADMINISTRATION 396.00 Total ; 396.00 56690 5/4/2022 000126 SECRETARY OF STATE - WA 7518 E BRIDGEPORT 001.013.015.515 FILING FEE FOR 7518 E BRIDGEPORT 50.00 Total: 50.00 12 Vouchers for bank code : apbank Bank total : 3,064.03 12 Vouchers in this report 1, the undersigned, do certify under penalty of perjury, that the materials have been furnished, the services rendered, or the labor performed as described herein and that the claim is just, due and an unpaid obligation against the City of Spokane Valley, and that I am authorized to authenticate and certify said claim. Finance Director Date Council member reviewed: Mayor Date Council Member Date Total vouchers : 3,064.03 Page: 2 vchlist Voucher List Page: 1 05/0412022 11:52:22AM Spokane Valley Bank code : pk-ref Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 9286 514/2022 008590 CALVO, RUDY PARK REFUN❑ 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: MIRABEAU MEADC 75.00 Total : 75.00 9287 5/4/2022 008591 EMERSON, CHRISSY PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 SUMMER DAY CAMP REFUND 156.00 Total : 156.00 9288 5/4/2022 008594 HELLBUSCH, f(AREN PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 SUMMER DAY CAMP REFUND 156.00 Total: 156.00 9289 5/4/2022 008593 NASINEC, TYCE PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: FIRESIDE LOUNGE 210.00 Total : 210.00 9290 5/4/2022 008592 NYMAN, TYLER PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 SHELTER FEE REFUND: VALLEY MISSI 100.00 Total : 100.00 5 Vouchers for bank code : pk-ref 5 Vouchers in this report Bank total : 697.00 Total vouchers : 697_00 Page: vchlist 05105/2022 4:41:59PM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: 1 Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept 56691 5/5/2022 006984 Al TREE SERVICE LLC 56692 5/5/2022 008462 ABSCO SOLUTIONS 56693 5/5/2022 007136 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES INC 56694 5/5/2022 000234 ARLT, SHANE 56695 5/5/2022 008479 BARCOTT CONSTRUCTION LLC 56696 5/5/2022 008377 BORJA, RACHEL 56697 5/5/2022 000101 CDW-G 56698 5/5/2022 000322 CENTURYLINK 56699 5/5/2022 001888 COMCAST 56700 5/5/2022 000603 CONTRACT DESIGN ASSOCIATES INC 56701 5/5/2022 001880 CROWN WEST REALTY LLC 56702 5/5/2022 007901 DATEC INC DescriptionlAccount Amount 4483 101.042.000.542 82166 1 FMK-VM 1 Y-H 1 QH 1 JK4-MX1 Y-MX6Y EXPENSES PAYAPP 1 EXPENSES V657783 835E3 4-14-2022 4668 4/17-5/16/22 50045 MAY 2022 50928 001.090.000.518 001.018.014.514 501.000.000.548 101.042.000.542 303.000.313.595 001.040.041.558 001.090.000.518 001.076.000.576 001.076.305.575 001.018.014.514 101.042.000.543 001.090.000.518 TREE REMOVAL & SERVICE VICON LICENSE RENEWAL OFFICE SUPPLIES: FINANCE VEHICLE MAINT SUPPLIES EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT Total : Total : Total: Total : 0313 BARKER RD UP CROSSING PH 1 Total : EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT Total : JOAN ROOMS ESSENTIALS SUBSCRIF Total : 2022 PHONE SVCS: ACCT 509-Z14-00Z Total : INTERNET & PHONE: CENTERPLACE Total : 3RD FLOOR PANELS Total: COMMON AREA CHARGES MAINTENAI Total : PALO ALTO FIREWALL SUPPORT RENE 3,702.60 3,702.60 382.24 382.24 159.89 792.54 952.43 1,111.29 1,111.29 141,884.50 141,884.50 17.55 17.55 158.04 158.04 543.71 543.71 370.91 370.91 1,890.84 1,890.84 166.08 168.08 16, 517.95 vchlist Voucher List Page: 2 0510512022 4:41:59PM Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice FundlDept DescriptionlAccount Amount 56702 5/5/2022 007901 007901 DATEC INC (Continued) Total: 16,517.95 56703 5/5/2022 003255 DAY WIRELESS SYSTEMS INV721290 101.042.000.543 TOWER RENT 218.73 Total : 218.73 56704 5/5/2022 002604 DELL FINANCIAL SERVICES LLC 81269634 001.090.000.548 COMPUTER LEASE: 001-8922117-022 423.88 81269635 001.090.000.548 COMPUTER LEASE: 001-8922117-018 651.56 81269636 001,090,000.548 COMPUTER LEASE: 001-8922117-019 52.66 81269637 001.090.000.548 COMPUTER LEASE: 001-8922117-020 638.80 81269638 001.090.000.548 COMPUTER LEASE: 001-8922117-021 503.76 81269656 001.090.000.548 COMPUTER LEASE: 001-8922117-011 806.78 81269657 001.090.000.548 COMPUTER LEASE: 001-8922117-012 266.18 81269658 001.090.000.548 COMPUTER LEASE: 001-8922117-013 986.55 81269659 001.090.000.548 COMPUTER LEASE: 001-8922117-014 142.27 81269660 001.090.000.548 COMPUTER LEASE: 001-8922117-015 176.38 81269661 001.090.000.548 COMPUTER LEASE: 001-8922117-016 409.18 81269662 001.090.000.548 COMPUTER LEASE: 001-8922117-017 487,31 81275395 001.090.000.548 COMPUTER LEASE: 001-8922117-007 139.58 81275396 001.090.000.548 COMPUTER LEASE: 001-8922117-008 658.51 81275397 001.090.000.548 COMPUTER LEASE: 001-8922117-009 368.09 81275398 001.090.000.548 COMPUTER LEASE: 001-8922117-010 187.76 Total : 6,899.25 56705 5/5/2022 000734 DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION RE-313-ATB20314053 101.042.000.542 REIMBURSE TRAFFIC SVCS 8,247.07 Total: 8,247.07 56706 5/5/2022 000246 EAST SPOKANE WATER DIST #1 APRIL 2022 402.402.000.531 WATER CHARGES 493.20 Total : 493.20 56707 5/5/2022 005505 EMERALD SERVICES INC 88574045 101.000.000.542 RECYCLING FOR MAINTENANCE SHOI 648.23 Total : 648.23 56708 5/5/2022 001232 FASTENAL CO IDLEW169757 101.042.000.542 SAFETY EQUIPMENT 203.10 Total : 203.10 56709 5/5/2022 001993 FISCH, PETE EXPENSES 101.043.000.542 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 1,109.88 Total : 1,109.88 Page: vchlist 0510512022 4:41:59PM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: 3 Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept 56710 5/5/2022 000011 GREATER SPOKANE VALLEY 56711 5/5/2022 001296 H.D. FOWLER CO INC 56712 5/5/2022 002043 HDR ENGINEERING INC 56713 5/512022 000421 HOHMAN, JOHN 56714 5/5/2022 002466 KENWORTH SALES COMPANY 56715 5/5/2022 000662 NATL. BARRICADE & SIGN CO 56716 5/5/2022 001035 NDM TECHNOLOGIES INC 56717 5/512022 000652 OFFICE DEPOT INC. 56718 5/5/2022 007280 PATTERSON, MARCI 56719 5/5/2022 005968 PRECISE MRM LLC 56720 5/5/2022 007741 REFRIGERATION SUPPLIES DIST 56721 5/5/2022 000709 SENSKE LAWN & TREE CARE INC. 32312 16067879 1200426086 EXPENSES May 2022 SPOR05065499 211070 211104 31844 239212168001 239223830001 EXPENSES 200-1036763 16284524-00 12885278 001.011.000.511 402.402.000.531 001,040,041.543 001.013.000.513 001.013.000.513 101.000.000.542 001.040.041.558 001,040,041.543 001.090.000.518 001.018.014.514 001.018.014.514 001.011.000.511 402.402.000.531 101.042. 000.543 402.402.000.531 Description/Account Amount CHAMBER BUSINESS AWARDS TICKE 75.00 Total : 75.00 SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Total : Total : EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT MONTHLY AUTO ALLOWANCE Total : VEHICLE REPAIR: SNOWFLEET MARKING PAINT SAFETY SUPPLIES Total : Total : WATCHGUARD TRADE UP T20 WITH 1 Total: OFFICE SUPPLIES: FINANCE OFFICE SUPPLIES: FINANCE EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT DATA PLAN Total Total: Total : HVAC UNIT - MAINTENANCE SHOP Total : 89.03 89.03 7,411.18 7,411.18 10.00 700.00 710.00 12,278.19 12,278.19 111.08 65.34 176.42 394.25 394.25 24.49 39.96 64.45 50.00 50.00 299.75 299.75 3,538.45 3,538.45 895 CONTRACT MAINTENANCE 531.43 vchlist Voucher List Page: 4 05105/2022 4:41:59PM Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice FundlDept DescriptionlAccount Amount 56721 5/5/2022 000709 000709 SENSKE LAWN & TREE CARE INC. (Continued) Total : 531.43 56722 5/5/2022 004535 SHRED -IT USA LLC 8001478990 001.090.000.518 DOCUMENT DESTRUCTION 156.30 Total : 156.30 56723 5/5/2022 006822 SNAP -ON INC ARV/52181696 501.000.000.548 SMALL TOOLS/MINOR EQUIPMENT 104.79 ARV/52671867 501.000.000.548 SMALL TOOLS/MINOR EQUIPMENT 43.30 Total: 148.09 56724 5/512022 000001 SPOKANE CO TREASURER 110100327 101.042.000.542 MARCH 2022 ENGINEERING 35,391.43 14801985 001.090.000.566 1ST QTR 2022 LIQUOR/EXCISE TAX 7,571.76 Total : 42,963.19 56725 5/5/2022 000405 SPOKANE VALLEY PARTNERS 2022 #3 001.090.000.560 2022 EDSS GRANT REIMBURSEMENT• 14,439.85 Total : 14,439.85 56726 5/5/2022 000093 SPOKESMAN -REVIEW, THE 2022-13 001.011.000.511 PHOTO: MAYOR 81.68 Total: 81.66 56727 5/5/2022 000065 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 3506928430 001.018.014.514 KITCHEN SUPPLIES 115.92 Total : 115.92 56728 5/5/2022 008463 TRUTH MINISTRIES OF SPOKANE 62025 001.013.000.565 RESERVED BEDS: JAN 1 - MAR 31 1,800.00 Total : 1,600.00 56729 5/5/2022 000167 VERA WATER & POWER APRIL 2022 101.042.000.542 UTILITIES: APRIL 2022 4,765.89 Total : 4,765.89 56730 5/5/2022 000087 VERIZON WIRELESS 9904473226 001.076.302.576 APRIL2022 CELL PHONE/DEVICE CHA 3,354.67 Total : 3,354.67 56731 5/5/2022 003210 WEST CONSULTANTS INC. 016676 402.000.000.531 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,157.05 Total : 2,157.05 56732 5/5/2022 007168 ZOOM VIDEO COMMUNICATIONS INC INV143406000 001.090.000.518 ZOOM RENEWAL 4,354.26 Total : 4,354.26 42 Vouchers for hank code : apbank Bank total : 285,472.65 Page: vchlist Voucher List Page: 1 05/0612022 10:03:02AM Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept DescriptionlAccount Amount 56733 5/6/2022 000508 CONOCOPH!LLIPS FLEET 80669866 001.040.043.558 APRIL 2022 FLEET FUEL BILL 2,751.67 Total : 1 Vouchers for bank code : apbank Bank total : 1 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers : I, the undersigned, do certify under penalty of perjury, that the materials have been furnished, the services rendered, or the labor performed as described herein and that the claim is just, due and an unpaid obligation against the City of Spokane Valley, and that I am authorized to authenticate and certify said claim. Finance Director Date Council member reviewed: Mayor Date Council Member Date 2,751.67 2,751.67 2,751.67 Page: Q vchlist Voucher List Page: 1 05/10/2022 10:39:25AM Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 7905 5/5/2022 000120 AWC Ben105806 001.231.16.00 HEALTH PLANS: PAYMENT 163,754.62 Total : 163,754.62 7907 5/5/2022 000165 DEPT OF RETIREMENT SYSTEMS Ben105808 001.231.15.00 PERS: PAYMENT 121,869.25 Total : 121,869.25 7912 5/5/2022 000699 WA COUNCIL CO/CITY EMPLOYEES Ben105810 303.231.21.00 UNION DUES: PAYMENT 2,824.10 Total : 2,824.10 7913 5/5/2022 007657 WA STATE SUPPORT REGISTRY Ben105812 001.231.20.00 DIVISION OF CHILD SUPPORT: PAYMEI 884.00 Total: 884.00 7918 5/5/2022 000120 AWC Ben105694 001.231.16.00 HEALTH PLANS (COUNCIL): PAYMENT 12,606.16 Total : 12,606.16 7919 5/5/2022 000682 EFTPS Ben105696 001.231.11.00 FEDERAL TAXES: PAYMENT 2,127.75 Total : 2,127.75 7920 5/5/2022 000165 DEPT OF RETIREMENT SYSTEMS Ben105698 001.231.15.00 PERS ELECTED OFFICIAL: PAYMENT 847.60 Total : 847.60 7921 5/5/2022 000210 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Ben105700 001.231.28.00 HEALTH REIMBURSEMENT ACCOUNT: 750.00 Total : 750.00 7922 5/5/2022 000048 VANTAGE TRANSFER AGENTS, 401A PLAN Ben105814 101.231.14.00 401A: PAYMENT 41,998.02 Total : 41,998.02 7923 5/5/2022 000682 EFTPS Ben105816 303.231.12.00 FEDERAL TAXES: PAYMENT 44,949.88 Total: 44,949.88 7924 5/5/2022 007303 VANTAGEPOINT TRANSFER AGENTS, 457 RO Beni 05818 001.231.23.00 457 ROTH OPTION: PAYMENT 4,978.69 Total : 4,978_69 7925 5/5/2022 000162 VANTAGE TRANSFER AGENTS, 401A EXEC P1 Ben105820 001.231.14.00 401 EXEC PLAN: PAYMENT 768.75 Total : 768,75 7926 5/5/2022 000145 VANTAGEPOINT TRANSFER AGENTS, 457 PLf Ben105822 001.231.18.00 457 DEFERRED COMPENSATION: PAYI 10,984.05 Page: L{{/ •`1� ,y - vchlist Voucher List Page: 2 05/1012022 10:39:25AM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 7926 515/2022 000145 000145 VANTAGEPCINTTRANSFER AGENTS, 45 (Continued} Total: 10,984.05 13 Vouchers for bank code : apbank Bank total : 409,342.87 13 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers : 409,342.87 I, the undersigned, do certify under penalty of perjury, that the materials have been furnished, the services rendered, or the labor performed as described herein and that the claim is just, due and an unpaid obligation against the City of Spokane Valley, and that I am authorized to authenticate and certify said claim. Finance Director Date Ccundl member reviewed: Mayor Date Council Member Date Page: zf L) t231- 9 whilst Voucher List Page: 1 05/1012022 12:28:55PM Spokane Valley Bank code : pk-ref Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 9291 5/10/2022 008056 DES ROSIERS, MARK PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: VALLEY MISSION F 75.00 Total : 75.00 9292 5/10/2022 008597 HARSE, JESSIE PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: EDGECLIFF PARK 75.00 Total : 75.00 9293 5/10/2022 008598 HENKE, JAMES PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: TERRACE VIEW 75.00 Total : 75.00 9294 5/10/2022 008599 TRAMMELL, MARY PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: EDGECLIFF PARK 75.00 Total : 75.00 4 Vouchers for bank code : pk-ref Bank total : 300.00 4 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers : 300.00 Page: I( vchlist Voucher List Page: 05/12/2022 10:26:17AM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 56734 5/12/2022 005048 PARAMETRIX INC 32107 311.000.334.595 0334- SPRAGUE AVE PRESERVATION 7,962.50 Total: 7,962.50 1 Vouchers for bank code : apbank Bank total : 7,962.60 1 Vouchers in this report I, the undersigned, do certify under penalty of perjury, that the materials have been fumished, the services rendered, or the labor performed as described herein and that the claim is just, due and an unpaid obligation against the City of Spokane Valley, and that [ am authorized to authenticate and certify said claim. Finance Director Date Council member reviewed: Mayor Date Council Member Date Total vouchers : 7,962.50 Page: ) 2i vchlist 05/12/2022 1:43:04PM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: 1 Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 56735 5/12/2022 000918 BLUE RIBBON LINEN SUPPLY INC 56736 5/12/2022 007114 CARDINAL INFRASTRUCTURE LLC 56737 5/12/2022 001888 COMCAST 56738 5/12/2022 007637 COMMONSTREET CONSULTING LLC 56739 5/12/2022 000326 CONSOLIDATED IRRIGATION #19 56740 5/12/2022 003624 DEHN, SHELLY 56741 5/12/2022 008139 E & H ENGINEERING INC 56742 5/12/2022 002157 ELJAY OIL COMPANY 56743 5/12/202.2 000179 GFOA 56744 5/12/2022 008573 INLAND INFRASTRUCTURE LLC 56745 5/12/2022 000388 IRVIN WATER DIST. #6 0350188 0352048 0353951 S0289088 S0289941 S0290975 2217 4466 4/26-5/25/22 CSROW 21344 6419.4 APRIL 2022 EXPENSES SV-0328220304 4326467 4328206 2231582 PAY APP 1 APRIL 2022 FundlDept 001.076.305.575 001.076.305.575 001.076.305.575 901.076.305.575 001.076.305.575 001.076.305.575 001.011.000.511 001.090.000.518 403.000.320.595 402.402.000.531 001.090.000.517 309.000.328.534 001.040.041.543 001.040.041.543 Description/Account Amount LINEN SERVICE AND LINEN SERVICE AND LINEN SERVICE AND LINEN SERVICE AND LINEN SERVICE AND LINEN SERVICE AND SUPPLY AT CENT SUPPLY AT CENT SUPPLY AT CENT SUPPLY AT CENT SUPPLY AT CENT SUPPLY AT CENT Total: PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INTERNET & PHONE: CITY HALL 0320 SULLIVAN PRESERVATION UTILITIES: CPW EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT Total : Total : Total: Total: Total: 0328 SULLIVAN WATERLINE PROJECT Total : FUEL FOR MAINTENANCE SHOP VEHII FUEL FOR MAINTENANCE SHOP VEHII Total : 001.018.014.514 DUES: TAYLOR, DOMRESE, NIMRI Total : 311.000.333.595 0333-EVERGREEN RD PRES BROADW Total : 001.076.300.576 UTILITIES: PARKS APRIL 2022 117.35 197.19 227.60 299.59 506.67 492.00 1,840.40 4,875.00 4,875.00 362.25 362.25 7,142.50 7,142.50 179.95 179.95 59.94 59.94 35, 640.75 35,640.75 4,984.65 2,698.39 7,683.04 640.00 640.00 273,082.63 273,082.63 175.00 Page: /3 vchlist 05112/2022 1:43:04PM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: 2 Bark code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept 56745 5/12/2022 000388 000388 IRVIN WATER DIST. #6 56746 5/12/2022 003090 NORTH 40 OUTFITTERS 56747 5/12/2022 003607 PHOENIX COMPANY 56748 5/12/2022 007730 ROYAL BUSINESS SYSTEMS 56749 5/12/2022 008565 SCH ENTERPRISES 56750 5/12/2022 003264 SHI INTERNATIONAL CORP 56751 5/12/2022 000391 SPOKANE VALLEY FIRE DIST. #1 56752 5/1212022 000065 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 56753 511212022 007594 STREETSCAN INC 56754 5112/2022 006846 US LINEN & UNIFORM INC 56755 5/12/2022 001887 VALMONT 56756 5/12/2022 004754 WAPRO (Continued) 105956/3 2375 IN168313 ESTIMATE 6927 B15077075 Q1-2022 FIRE FEES 3506923429 10788 2916950 2920855 2924722 2928486 CO2202746 101.042.000.543 101.043,000,542 001.040.043.558 403.000.317.595 001.013.015.515 001.229.45.00 001.090.000.518 101.042.000.542 101.042.000.543 402.402.000.531 101.042.000.543 101.042.000.543 101 042.099.542 5197 001.013.000.513 Description/Account Amount REPAIR & MAINT. SUPPLIES RAILING INSTALLATION APRIL 2022 COPIER COSTS BOLLARDS FOR CIP-0317 Total: Total : Total : Total: Total : ADOBE ACROBAT LICENSE ADDITION/ Total : Q1-2022 FIRE FEES KITCHEN SUPPLIES Total : Total: SOFTWARE LICENSE & SUPPORT Total: SUPPLIES: MAINTENANCE SHOP SUPPLIES: MAINTENANCE SHOP SUPPLIES: MAINTENANCE SHOP SUPPLIES: MAINTENANCE SHOP Total: LIGHT POLE REPAIR (APPLEWAY/DAR Total: 175.00 30.47 30.47 8,480.00 8,480.00 579.23 579.23 4,580.33 4,580.33 42.63 42.63 44,243.00 44,243.00 54.67 54.67 16,500.00 16,500.00 18.49 31.60 18.49 31.60 100.18 2,368.58 2,368.58 CRO CERTIFICATION: C KOUDELKA 100.00 Total: 100.00 vchlist 05/1212022 1:43:04PM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: 3 Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept 56757 5/12/2022 007160 WASHINGTON HOSPITALITYASSN 56758 5/12/2022 000066 WCP SOLUTIONS 56759 5/12/2022 001885 ZAYO GROUP LLC 16525311 5/5/2022 000001 SPOKANE CO TREASURER 26 Vouchers for bank code : apbank 26 Vouchers in this report 0128750 001.076.305.575 12739243 12741279 12748300 2022050003578 2022050005522 2022050025710 APRIL 2022 001.076.305.575 001.076.305.575 001.076.305.575 001.090.000.518 001.090.000.518 001.090.000.518 001.016.000.512 DescriptionlAccount Amount MEMBERSHIP INVESTMENT Total: SUPPLIES FOR CENTERPLACE SUPPLIES AT CENTERPLACE SUPPLIES FOR CENTERPLACE Total : NETWORK INFRASTRUCTURE ACCES INTERNET SERVICES NETWORK INFRASTRUCTURE ACCES. Total : SPOKANE COUNTY SERVICES Total : Bank total : Total vouchers : 500.00 500.00 182.95 700.75 48.80 932.50 291.57 626.70 251.09 1,169.36 197,844.69 197,844.69 609,207.10 609,207.10 Page: /5— vchiist 05/13/2022 8:18:52AM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: 1 Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice FundlDept 56760 5/1312022 000197 ACRANET 20161 56761 5/13/2022 008010 ADVANCED MARKETING CONCEPT LLC 8326 56762 5/13/2022 001081 ALSCO LSP02515569 LSP02519885 56763 5/13/2022 007136 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES INC 56764 5/13/2022 007808 AMENTO GROUP INC 56765 5/13/2022 007718 APPLETREE 56766 5/13/2022 000444 ARCTIC LIGHTING & ELECTRIC 56767 5/13/2022 007965 ARGUS JANITORIAL 56768 5/13/2022 001862 BISCHOFF, PATTY 56769 5/13/2022 000918 BLUE RIBBON LINEN SUPPLY INC 56770 5/13/2022 004854 CAMTEK INC 1 FTF-YKG6-NMTW 1 HYR-QD1 J-7MYT 1 VHY-4CD7-M N3D 1YMV-MC6F-7VJW 032240 000024-909-901 765 LNV12341 EXPENSES 0348325 56432 Description/Account Amount 001.018.016.518 001.076.305.575 001.016.016.521 001.016.016.521 001.033.033.518 001.076.301.571 001.033.033.518 001.076,301,571 001.000.322.518 001,076,305.575 00 1.016.000.594 001.016.016.521 001.076.000.576 001.076.305.575 001.016.016.521 EMPLOYEE BACKGROUND CHECKS 328.00 Total : 328.00 ADVERTISING Total : FLOOR MAT SERVICE AT PRECINCT FLOOR MAT SERVICE AT PRECINCT Total : BOTTLE FILLER FILTERS: CITY HALL SUPPLIES: RECREATION JANITORIAL SUPPLIES: CITY HALL SUPPLIES: RECREATION Total: PROFESSIONAL SERVICES: CITY HALL Total : ANSWERING SERVICE FOR CENTERP Total: INSTALLATION OF 2 (30') POLE LIGHT$ Total : JANITORIAL SVCS: PRECINCT, MAINT. Total: EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT Total : LINEN SERVICE AND SUPPLY AT CENT Total: FIRE MONITORING: PRECINCT 675.00 675.00 30.89 30.43 61.32 184.01 69.07 51.13 71.39 375.60 2,713.00 2,713.00 44.74 44.74 20, 360.06 20,380.06 3,950.00 3,950.00 72.47 72.47 212.67 212.67 225.97 Total: 225.97 Page: /J vchlist 05/13/2022 8:18:52AM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: 2 Sank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 56771 5/13/2022 001770 CONSOLIDATED SUPPLY CO 56772 5/13/2022 000603 CONTRACT DESIGN ASSOCIATES INC 56773 5/13/2022 008503 CRANETECH INC 56774 5/13/2022 007871 EMPIRE SPRAY SERVICE INC 56775 5/1312022 007740 EVERGREEN STATE TOWING LLC 56776 5/13/2022 000007 GRAINGER 56777 5/13/2022 000011 GREATER SPOKANE VALLEY 56778 5/13/2022 001635 ISS FACILITY EVENT SERVICES 56779 5/13/2022 008493 MATTOX, SARAH 56780 5/13/2022 004630 MAY, KENDALL 56781 5113/2022 000652 OFFICE DEPOT INC. S010706260.001 S010706260.002 S010743826.001 510706260.003 50026 25838 GH042301 JK031602 65046 9274808923 9277558046 32292 1610931 EXPENSES EXPENSES EXPENSES 233600998001 239580056001 Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 001.076.305.575 001.076.305.575 001.033.033.518 001.076.305.575 001.013.099.594 001.016.000.521 001.033.033.518 001.016.016.521 001.076.099.576 001.033.033.518 001.033.033.518 001.076.305.575 001.076.305.575 001.018.014.514 001.076.304.575 001.076.304.575 001.076.305.575 001.076.305.575 PARTS FOR HVAC REPAIR PROJECTA PARTS FOR HVAC REPAIR PROJECTA REPAIR & MAINT. SUPPLIES: CITY HAL PARTS FOR HVAC REPAIR PROJECTA Total : 3RD FLOOR CONFERENCE TABLE Total : SERVICE VEHICLE LIFTS: PRECINCT Total : SPRING BROADLEAF SPRAY: CITY HAI SPRING WEED FREE SHRUB BEDS: Pi Total : BOULDER PLACEMENT FOR MISSION Total : REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES: CITY HAL JANITORIAL SUPPLIES: CITY HALL Total: ADVERTISING: CENTERPLACE Total : APRIL 2022 MONTHLY CLEANING AT C. Total : Total: Total : EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 430.70 5,567.93 138.71 2,316.94 8,454.28 3,077.25 3,077.25 522.72 522.72 277.70 234.14 511.84 817.50 817.50 65.58 7.77 73.35 375.00 375.00 8,085.09 8,085.09 10.82 10.82 84.72 71.26 155.98 OFFICE SUPPLIES: CENTERPLACE 23.26 OFFICE SUPPLIES: CENTERPLACE -12.38 Page: /t vchlist 05/1312022 8:18:52AM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: 3 Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept 56781 5/13/2022 000652 OFFICE DEPOT INC. 56782 5/13/2022 001860 PLATT ELECTRIC SUPPLY 56783 5/13/2022 007677 PROCTOR SALES INC 56784 5/13/2022 000019 PURFECT LOGOS LLC 56785 5/13/2022 007741 REFRIGERATION SUPPLIES DIST 56786 5/13/2022 000065 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 56787 5/13/2022 000419 SUMMIT LAW GROUP PLLC 56788 5/13/2022 008558 THE HOME DEPOT PRO 56789 5/13/2022 007120 TSHIMAKAIN CREEK LABORATORY 56790 5/13/2022 006178 WALTER E NELSON CO (Continued) 240712631001 240730888001 241989867001 242000739001 242007061001 2R43531 2R47776 2S22286 0327729-IN 57027 16286944-00 3506928426 135703 679002303 680314531 680314549 F000140- 001.013.015.515 001.013.015.515 001.076.305.575 001.076.305.575 001.018.016.518 001.076.305.575 001.076.305.575 001.033.033.518 001.076.305.575 001.040.000.518 001.076.305.575 001.033.033.518 001.018.016.518 001.033.033.518 001.033.033.518 001.016.016.521 001.076.300.576 469377 001.076.305.575 Description/Account Amount OFFICE SUPPLIES: LEGAL OFFICE SUPPLIES: LEGAL OFFICE SUPPLIES: CENTERPLACE OFFICE SUPPLIES: CENTERPLACE OFFICE SUPPLIES: HR Total : REPAIR & MAINT. SUPPLIES: CENTERF REPAIR & MAINT. SUPPLIES: CENTERF REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES: CITY HAL Total : REPAIR & MAINT. SUPPLIES: CENTERF Total: NAME PLATES Total : REPAIR & MAINT. SUPPLIES: CENTER; Total: OFFICE SUPPLIES: D. HORTON PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Total : Total: JANITORIAL SUPPLIES: CITY HALL JANITORIAL SUPPLIES: CITY HALL JANITORIAL SUPPLIES: PRECINCT Total: ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING AT PARKS Total: 263.33 25.24 27.06 24.90 116.67 468.08 27.80 74.49 30.52 132.81 136.05 136.05 206.91 206.91 166.76 166.78 43.23 43.23 315.00 315.00 23.96 630.59 408.11 1,062.66 30.00 30.00 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES: CENTERPLACI 642.08 Page: / vchlist 05113/2022 8:18:52AM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: 4 Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept 56790 5/13/2022 006178 006178 WALTER E NELSON CO 55791 5113/2022 007231 WESTERN EXTERMINATOR COMPANY 56792 5113/2022 002363 WESTERN STATES EQUIPMENT CO 56793 5/13/2022 000129 WRPA 56794 5/13/2022 001793 WWRC 35 Vouchers for bank code : apbank 35 Vouchers in this report (Continued) 14584236 14584237 15355708 15355709 IN002002698 7479 WWRC22-M 001.016.016.521 001.033.033.518 001.016.016.521 001.033.033.518 001.033.033.518 001.076.000.576 001.076.000.576 Description/Account Amount Total : 642.08 PEST MGMT SERVICES: PRECINCT PEST MGMT SERVICES: CITY HALL PEST MGMT SERVICES: PRECINCT PEST MGMT SERVICES: CITY HALL Total: LOAD BANK FOR CITY HALL GENERAT Total : MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL: PARKS & RE Total : 2022 WWRC MEMBERSHIP Total: Bank total Total vouchers : 198.96 169.23 198.96 169.23 736.38 958.94 958.94 1,250.00 1,250.00 750.00 750.00 58,021.58 58,021.58 Page: / �� CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: May 24, 2022 Department Director Approval: Item: Check all that apply: ® consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ['admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Payroll for Pay Period Ending May 15, 2022 GOVERNING LEGISLATION: PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: BACKGROUND: BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Employees Council Total Gross: $ 354, 994.81 $ - $ 354, 994.81 Benefits: $ 67,418.48 $ - $ 67,418.48 Total payroll $ 422,413.29 $ $ 422,413.29 RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to Approve above payroll. [Approved as part of the Consent Agenda, or may be removed and discussed separately.] STAFF CONTACT: Raba Nimri DRAFT MINUTES City of Spokane Valley City Council Study Session Meeting Tuesday, May 3, 2022 Mayor Haley called the meeting to order at 6 p.m. The meeting was held in person by Council and staff in Council Chambers, and also remotely via Zoom meeting. Attendance: Councilmembers Pam Haley, Mayor Rod Higgins, Deputy Mayor Tim Hattenburg, Councilmember Laura Padden, Councilmember Brandi Peetz, Councilmember Ben Wick, Councilmember Arne Woodard, Councilmember Staff John Hohman, City Manager Erik Lamb, Deputy City Manager Chelsie Taylor, Finance Director Cary Driskell, City Attorney Bill Helbig, Community & Public Works Dir. John Bottelli, Parks, Rec & Facilities Dir. Dave Ellis, Police Chief Adam Jackson, Planning/Grants Engineer Morgan Koudelka, Sr. Administrative Analyst Jenny Nickerson, Building Official Chaz Bates, Planning Manager Mike Basinger, Economic Development Dir. Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk ROLL CALL: City Clerk Bainbridge called roll; all Councilmembers were present. APPROVAL OF AMENDED AGENDA It was moved by Deputy Mayor Higgins, seconded and unanimously agreed to approve the agenda. PROCLAMATIONS: Recognizing Child Care Providers; Older Americans' Month Mayor Haley read the proclamations as noted above. ACTION ITEMS: 1. Motion Consideration: Stormwater Comp Plan and Rate Study Consultant Services Agreement — Bill Helbig It was moved by Deputy Mayor Higgins and seconded to authorize the City Manager to finalize and execute an Agreement for Professional Services with Osborn Consulting, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $282, 612.00 for the Stormwater Comprehensive Plan and Rate Study. After Mr. Helbig gave a brief summary of the purpose of the plan, Mayor Haley invited public comments. No comments were offered. Vote by acclamation: in favor unanimous. Opposed: none. Motion carried. 2. Motion Consideration: 2020 Pedestrian and Bicycle Program Grant Award — Adam Jackson It was moved by Deputy Mayor Higgins and seconded to authorize the City Manager or designee to accept the Pedestrian & Bicycle Program award for the Sprague Avenue crossing between City Hall and Balfour Park project. After Mr. Jackson gave a brief summary of the grant award process, Mayor Haley invited public comments. No comments were offered. Vote by acclamation: in favor unanimous. Opposed: none. Motion carried. NON -ACTION ITEMS: 3. City Hall Update — Bill Helbig, Shane McFetridge Community and Public Works Director Helbig introduced Mr. Shane McFetridge, the City's outside consulting attorney, who read a prepared statement explaining the background of the building, including the City's occupation of the building in September 2017, the discovery of construction and/or design concepts, the hiring of consultants to identify the nature and extent of the defects, the hiring of himself as Council Meeting Minutes, Study Session: 05-03-2022 Page 1 of 4 Approved by Council: DRAFT special litigation counsel; that suit was filed April 2020 naming as defendants allegedly responsible for the various defects, prime contractor Meridian Construction, Architects West, AltWest Testing & Engineering, and Eight31 Consulting; that the parties have engaged in the discovery process which includes extensive testing of various areas and systems of City Hall; that the parties agreed that mediation may assist in solving some or all outstanding issues, the first session was conducted March 17, 2022 with all defendants and most subcontractors attending; additional mediation sessions are scheduled for late fall 2022; in the event of unsuccessful mediation, trial is set for March 6, 2023. Mr. McFetridge stated that the City has not waited to conclude the litigation before beginning some of the necessary repairs; and that the City continues to move forward toward resolution in a manner that seeks to hold those who created the defeats, fully responsible. Director Helbig then went over the funds expended to date as shown in table 1 of the agenda packet materials, as well as anticipated 2022 funds needed as shown in table 2; and noted that staff anticipate we will need an additional $700,000 which will include litigation support, project management and necessary construction over the entire four and a half year history including up through spring of 2023; and he noted as there are currently no funds appropriated in the 2022 budget, a future budget amendment will be required. After brief Council discussion, there was unanimous Council consensus to include $700,000 in the 2022 budget amendment, for the additional expenditures for City Hall as noted. 4. 2022 Budget Amendment — Chelsie Taylor Finance Director Taylor went over the highlights of the budget amendment materials, and noted that the prior agenda item of $700,000 is not included, but it will be included when the public hearing and first reading of the ordinance to amend the budget, is brought to Council May 24. 5. Potential grant Opportunities: Safe Routes to School; and 2022 Pedestrian Bicycle Program — Adam Jackson After Mr. Jackson went over the background of the potential grant opportunities for submitting grants to the Pedestrian and Bicycle program, and to the Safe Routes to School program, including total available program funds and that no match is required, there was Council discussion about the River Loop and the Kaiser Aluminum plant. Mr. Hohman stated that once he has more details about some of the concerns of Kaiser that will be brought back to Council; that the river loop does require some additional work, and perhaps Sullivan to Flora would be the better segment rather than Plantes Ferry to Sullivan. Councilmember Padden said she would prefer spending be focused on the high priority projects like the Barker Corridor, while Councilmember Wick said he likes the idea of starting to make some progress on the loop trail. After further discussion about the recommended project list, four Councilmembers agreed to have the loop trail projects removed from consideration; and agreed that staff should bring back at the next Council meeting for a motion consideration, that South Barker Road Corridor, Sprague to 4th Avenue project under the Pedestrian Bicycle Program, and the South Barker Road Corridor, 4th to 8th Avenue project under the Safe Routes to School Program. 6. Parking on Private Property — Bill Helbig, Erik Lamb, Jenny Nickerson Deputy City Manager Lamb explained that staff is looking for more direction concerning these issues; said a draft code is enclosed in tonight's packet materials, which can be modified as Council desires; that there is also the possibility that some issues might need to go before the Planning Commission; and that the topics for tonight's discussion include (1)junk/inoperable vehicle storage, (2) vehicle (including RV) parking and storage on private property, (3) RV and tent camping on private property, and (4) multifamily parking issues. 1. Junk/Inoperable Vehicle Storage As Council was reminded of the City's and state's four criteria of what defines a junk vehicle; i.e. (a) three years old or order, (b) extensively damaged, (c) apparently inoperable, and (d) has an approximate fair market value equal only to the approximate value of the scrap in it; most discussion focused on whether to allow one junk vehicle per lot, screening or enclosed structure. Mr. Lamb stated that our code currently Council Meeting Minutes, Study Session: 05-03-2022 Page 2 of 4 Approved by Council: DRAFT allows two junk vehicles and a `parts' vehicle and they must be kept in a lawful structure, behind a fence or screened. Mr. Lamb explained that the proposal is not to change the definition of a junk vehicle, but the proposal is to include a definition of `unlicensed vehicle.' Enforceability was also mentioned. There was five to two Council consensus to allow just one junk vehicle behind a fence; and unanimous Council consensus to add the unlicensed vehicle definition. 2. Vehicle (including RV) Parking and Storage on Private Property Director Helbig lead this discussion noting the City's current code has no limits on the number or location of parked vehicles on private property; and that the draft revised code limits parking/storage only as an accessory use to an established residential permitted use; limits the number of parked or storage vehicles visible from the public right-of-way as well as limits the number of RVs unless the property is greater than one acre, and includes no parking within required side or rear yards and parking only on areas with pavement, concrete, grasscrete or similar material. Mr. Lamb noted that enforcing this provision would be a challenge but complaints received have been about people parking in their front yards, so the question is does Council just want to focus on junk vehicles. Council discussion included mention that many properties don't have concrete upon which to park; concrete or asphalt is expensive; four self-propelled vehicles is enough, which might include one private use RV, one trailer to haul trash, etc.; to perhaps just focus on the maximum number of RV's per lot and not the number of trailers or cars; the idea is to try to avoid people living in their RV's; and there was ultimate Council consensus (six to one) to allow one RV with exceptions, and not to worry about the groundscape. Mr. Driskell mentioned that Council could set a standard but allow for exceptions, there was also Council consensus to go with a limit of five vehicles that are visible on the private property. Mr. Hohman said this would not be complaint -driven, and would be enforceable. 3. RV and tent camping on private property After brief Council discussion, Council agreed to 30 days for the temporary permit, and for short term tent use, 48 hours for four times a year. 4. Multifamily Development Parking. In response to Councilmember Padden's question about whether this would apply to existing multifamily, Mr. Lamb said this would not address current structures where we are having issues with street parking, as we could not go back to require additional spaces. Deputy Mayor Higgins said he doesn't agree with the current code to allow 1.5 spaces per dwelling, and he also doesn't like the idea of subsidizing property owners where they charge for parking. After discussion about the number of spaces, there was consensus to change that to two spaces. Councilmember Woodard asked if it is possible to stop the fee for parking on existing developments, and Mr. Driskell said he will research that, but impairment of contract could be argued; said he will look at other areas and see if anyone else includes that. Mayor Haley noted that if developments won't be able to charge for parking, they'll just put it on the apaitnient fee, and apartment rentals are very high now; said she world personally prefer not to look at that issue. Deputy Mayor Higgins said he likes the idea of changing the required space to two and to continue with the rest of the proposed language. Mayor Haley called for a recess at 8:03 p.m.; she reconvened the meeting at 8:13 p.m. 7. Comprehensive Plan Amendments — Chaz Bates After Mr. Bates went through his PowerPoint explaining about the four proposed comprehensive plan amendments, and there was Council consensus to proceed with a first reading as proposed. 8. Law Enforcement Interlocal Agreement — Erik Lamb, Chief Ellis, Morgan Koudelka Deputy City Manager Lamb stated that we are in the last year of a five-year agreement; and if we want to renew with any changes, we would need to give the County notice. Mr. Lamb briefly went over the history of our agreement and of our dedicated officers, shared officers, and law enforcement budgeted costs as well as noting the percentage those costs represents out of our general fund budget. Mr. Lamb mentioned that the typical driver of cost increases are cost -of -living adjustments, and increases to health insurance Council Meeting Minutes, Study Session: 05-03-2022 Page 3 of 4 Approved by Council: DRAFT premiums. Mr. Koudelka then went over the organizational chart, patrol platoons' staffing; officers who supplement patrol response such as resource officers and the homeless services deputy; patrol platoon scheduling which also must accommodate vacation, training and other officer leave; patrol platoon staffing availability, workload and performance measures, civilian positions, capital facilities and equipment, and a chart showing the police service demand of population and calls for service. Mr. Lamb noted the considerations for Council shown on slide 30, and said if Council would like any other information as they think about the contract renewal, to let staff know; said he is not asking for any decisions tonight, adding that next week Council will hear a presentation from Chief Ellis regarding ARPA. There was also discussion about Crime Check with mention from Chief Ellis about the need for data reporting, and that we pay the actual cost for what we use. Mr. Koudelka mentioned the reconciling and settle and adjust, which takes place after the end of the year. At 8:58 p.m., it was moved by Deputy Mayor Higgins, seconded and unanimously agreed to extend the meeting for 10 minutes. 9. Advance Agenda — Mayor Haley Councilmember Wick mentioned that Innovia has an upcoming summit set for May 16, and asked if a report could be given to Council concerning their request, prior to that summit. Mr. Lamb said staff can bring back a report just on Innovia and there was Council consensus. 10. Community & Public Works Monthly Report This report was for information only and was not discussed or reported. 11. Council Comments — Mayor Haley There were no additional Council comments. 12. City Manager Comments — John Hohman In turning the floor over to City Attorney Driskell, Mr. Driskell introduced recently hired Senior Deputy City Attorney Mr. Tony Bettie. Mr. Hohman noted the two letters placed on Council dais, one a draft letter to support the air mobility command, and Council agreed to send the letter of support with Mayor Haley's signature; and the second a letter from Spokane County Treasurer Baumgartner thanking us for providing space in our City Hall for people to come pay their taxes; and he said there were about 200 people who used our facility to pay their taxes, adding that it is a great service for our citizens. It was moved by Deputy Mayor Higgins, seconded and unanimously agreed to adjourn. The meeting adjourned at 9:04 p.m. ATTEST: Pam Haley, Mayor Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Council Meeting Minutes, Study Session: 05-03-2022 Page 4 of 4 Approved by Council: DRAFT MINUTES City of Spokane Valley City Council Regular Formal Meeting Tuesday, May 10, 2022 Mayor Haley called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. The meeting was held virtually via Zoom, and also in City Hall Council Chambers with Council and staff attending in person. Attendance: Councilmembers Pam Haley, Mayor Rod Higgins, Deputy Mayor Tim Hattenburg, Councilmember Laura Padden, Councilmember Brandi Peetz, Councilmember Ben Wick, Councilmember Arne Woodard, Councilmember Staff John Hohman, City Manager Erik Lamb, Deputy City Manager Bill Helbig, Community & Public Works Director Chelsie Taylor, Finance Director Cary Driskell, City Attorney John Bottelli, Parks, Rec & Facilities Director Gloria Mantz, City Engineer Chaz Bates, Planning Manager Adam Jackson, Planning/Grants Engineer Mike Basinger, Economic Development Director Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk INVOCATION: In the absence of a pastor, Council, staff and members of the public observed a moment of silence. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Council, staff and the audience stood for the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL City Clerk Bainbridge called the roll; all Councilmembers were present. APPROVAL OF AGENDA It was moved by Deputy Mayor Higgins, seconded and unanimously agreed to approve the agenda. INTRODUCTION OF SPECIAL GUESTS AND PRESENTATIONS: n/a COMMITTEE, BOARD, LIAISON SUMMARY REPORTS Councilmember Wick: said he attended the Chamber of Commerce's business showcase; that at the FMSIB (Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board) meeting, they were preparing for their annual retreat in June; said they will be discussing truck parking issues as well as how to better move freight out of the Seattle area; said that AWC (Association of Washington Cities) asked him to help chair the Large City Advisory Committee. Councilmember Woodard: reported that today he attended the 34th annual Law Enforcement Memorial held at the courthouse; went to a Growth Management Steering Committee of Elected Officials meeting where they worked to simplify their policies. Councilmember Hattenburg: said he also attended today's memorial; had a meeting with the STA (Spokane Transit Authority) Planning & Development Committee; said the surveys show interest in having a park and ride and bus routes in the Argonne area; said the STA total project cost will be approximately $7.7 million and they hope to wrap it up in 2024, and that they also will add routes to Amazon. Councilmember Peetz: stated that she attended GSI's (Greater Spokane, Inc.) State of the City, and that the Spokane Mayor is working on a homelessness plan, part of which includes the relocation of the House of Charity out of the downtown area, so they are looking for a site which could hold over 300 people; said the plan is for a 24/7, low barrier shelter; said she also attended the Business showcase where she got to meet several new businesses; spoke about the Spokane Police Department's statistics about crime, drugs and the courts; mentioned Spokane City's Mental Health Task Force and of the regional collaboration; and that she attended last night's candlelight vigil as part of the law enforcement memorial. Council Meeting Minutes, Formal: 05-10-2022 Page 1 of 7 Approved by Council: DRAFT Councilmember Padden: mentioned the Valley Chamber's membership report shows they have reached pre -pandemic numbers; said they launched a new website; spoke about the Spokane Valley Tech Facility; said that Liberty Lake had several announcements including a zone change on the Meadowwood Tech Center; said that they have partnered with Greenstone concerning upcoming development with retail on the bottom floor and residential on top. Deputy Mayor Higgins: reported that he attended the Clean Air Agency Board meeting where they reviewed the new public comment rules adopted by the legislature; said this was the first meeting in person at their new place in Airway Heights; that the focus of the meeting and workshop after was finances as they haven't raised some rates in some cases in more than ten years; he also attended the Aging and Long Term Care meeting where they too reviewed changes in public comments in accordance with the Open Public Meetings Act amendments; and that they will have a voucher program for seniors to help with purchases at farmers markets. MAYOR'S REPORT Mayor Haley mentioned the STA performance measures from last year to this year and that they performed well; that STA had the free pass through the summer for kids up to age 18, and that they will be re -doing a few routes to help kids get to school via STA bus; said the bus to Amazon is likely going to happen toward the end of August; said it was mentioned that property crimes haven't gone up much but that she sees almost daily, cars having been broken into. PROCLAMATIONS: The following proclamations were read: Lemonade Day received with thanks from Mr. Lance Beck from the Chamber of Commerce; Police Week, received with thanks from Chief Ellis; Lupus Awareness, received with thanks from Ms. Karen Gallion; and Mental Health Awareness received with thanks from Mr. Phil Tyler with the Mental Health Task Force. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT OPPORTUNITY 111: Mayor Haley explained the process, then invited public comments. Mr. Dan Allison, Spokane Valley: told a story about him getting food to the homeless pavilion, and of the conditions of the area, as well as some comments from one of the homeless individuals. Dr. Mamie Rorholm, Spokane Valley Performing Arts Center: said the ARPA funds would provide a great opportunity; said the land is already purchased and the project is within Spokane Valley borders; said they didn't have a season in 2020 due to Covid, but had a modified season in 2021; said she is working with the County also for a $1 million grant; said her initial request was $500,000 which could be put toward construction, and said if there are any remaining funds, she would be grateful for consideration. Mr. John Harding, Spokane Valley: questioned the public notification process when a subdivision is installed in a neighborhood and mentioned Desmet; said the only people contacted were residents of two corner houses; mentioned a short plat doesn't have a designation of feet concerning notice; said citizens need to be aware of projects and it would be helpful to expand the contact area to give more citizens notice. Mr. Renault Patrick Evans: gave a little of his background; said feels we need to do more to preserve the land and the natural beauty, and suggested halting land development; said that growth should be balanced with natural beauty and resources. NEW BUSINESS: 1. Consent Agenda: Consists of items considered routine which are approved as a group. Any member of Council may ask that an item be removed from the Consent Agenda to be considered separately. Proposed Motion: I move to approve the Consent Agenda. a. Approval of Claim Vouchers on May 10, 2022, Request for Council Action Form: $2,677,681.96 b. Approval of Payroll for Pay Period ending April 30, 2022: $589,115.83 c. Approval of Council Meeting Minutes of April 26, 2022, Special Council Meeting d. Approval of Council Meeting Minutes of April 26, 2022, Formal Council Meeting It was moved by Deputy Mayor Higgins, seconded and unanimously agreed to approve the consent agenda. Council Meeting Minutes, Formal: 05-10-2022 Page 2 of 7 Approved by Council: DRAFT 2. First Reading Ordinance 22-006 Comprehensive Plan Amendments — Chaz Bates After City Clerk Bainbridge read the ordinance title, it was moved by Deputy Mayor Higgins and seconded to advance Ordinance 22-006 to a second reading. Mr. Bates went through the PowerPoint to explain the comprehensive amendments. Mayor Haley said there will be no public comments since a public hearing was previously held on this item. Vote by acclamation: in favor: unanimous. Opposed: none. Motion carried. 3. First Reading Ordinance 22-007 Comprehensive Plan Zoning Map — Chaz Bates After City Clerk Bainbridge read the ordinance title, it was moved by Deputy Mayor Higgins and seconded to advance ordinance 22-007 to a second reading. Mr. Bates explained that this is the companion ordinance to the previous agenda item. Vote by acclamation: in favor: unanimous. Opposed: none. Motion carried. 4. Motion Consideration Potential Grants: Safe Routes to School; 2022 Pedestrian/Bicycle — Adam Jackson It was moved by Deputy Mayor Higgins and seconded to authorize the City Manager or designee to apply to the Pedestrian & Bicycle Program and Safe Routes to School Program grants for those projects identified in the above table; i.e. S. Barker Road Corridor, Sprague Avenue to 4th Avenue for the Pedestrian & Bicycle Program, and S. Barker Road Corridor, 4th Avenue to 8th Avenue for the Safe Routes to School Program. Mr. Jackson briefly went over the background of this item, as noted on his Request for Council Action form. Mayor Haley invited public comments. Ms. Barb Howard, Spokane Valley: speaking via zoom, she stated her concern about kids trying to cross the street as one goes north on Pines. Mr. John Harding, Spokane Valley: spoke in general about reduction of vehicle lanes due to the addition of bike lanes. Vote by acclamation: in favor: unanimous. Opposed: none. Motion carried. 5. Motion Consideration: Bid Award, Sprague Avenue Preservation — Gloria Mantz It was moved by Deputy Mayor Higgins and seconded to award the Sprague Preservation, Havana to Fancher CIP #0334 construction contract to Inland Asphalt in the amount of $2, 639, 999 and authorize the City Manager to finalize and execute the construction contract. After City Engineer Mantz gave an explanation of the project and bid process, Mayor Haley invited public comments. No comments were offered. Vote by acclamation: in favor: unanimous. Opposed: none. Motion carried. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT OPPORTUNITY 121: Mayor Haley invited public comments. Ms. Barb Howard, Spokane Valley was signed up to speak via zoom, but due to technical difficulties, was not able to do so. There were no other public comments. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS: 6. American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) Funding — Erik Lamb, Chelsie Taylor Deputy City Manager Lamb explained that this is an opportunity to further discuss the City's ARPA funding; that last week Councilmember Wick said he was contacted by Innovia that they have some kind of a function scheduled for May 16, so Council agreed to put this on tonight's agenda, as well as an opportunity to hear an update on revenue replacement. Finance Director Taylor noted that after performing calculations for lost revenues, staff determined there are no lost revenues at year end 2021; and the next time for calculations will be after the close of the books for 2022, which will occur during spring 2023. Ms. Taylor reminded Council that $250,000 has already been calculated for internal City costs and $750,000 for the Buckeye sewer project, leaving approximately $4.2 million that must fit within one of the categories other than revenue replacement. Discussion turned to the Innovia request of $2 million, and of the CLFR (Coronavirus Local Fiscal Recovery Fund) subcommittee's recommendation to provide $500,000; mention that the County voted to award $5 million, with allocations coming to Innovia from other sources. Councilmember Padden raised concerns of how much it will cost to implement their project in our community, where does the money goes, what percentage is administrative and what might go to public schools; concern with duplication of efforts on scholarships while there is a need to help students with childcare and housing; that enrollment Council Meeting Minutes, Formal: 05-10-2022 Page 3 of 7 Approved by Council: DRAFT has been declining for the tech school, yet the school has more money on a federal level than they ever have had; that she has no doubt they are a good organization but she needs more details on how this project will be accomplished; mostly that she wants to know where the money will be going. Councilmember Woodard said this is a four-year initiative; and part of that is to couple with other organizations that have traditionally been given grants; that Innovia would disburse to others so it might make it simpler by giving to this organization; he suggests $1 million split over four years; and indicated that he too has high confidence in Innovia. Councilmember Hattenburg said he also feels the organization is well organized, will spend the money wisely, has very little overhead, feels $500,000 is something we need to do, and that they can coordinate with other nonprofits so there won't be duplication. Mr. Lamb mentioned the funds would be solely used for implementation and none of it would be for scholarships. Councilmember Wick said it seems this organization is trying to get groups to come together, and he feels this is an area that needs attention to get the kids back on track. Councilmember Peetz stated she also supports Innovia and is excited about some of their initiatives, and suggested they come before Council to give more information. There was ultimately Council consensus to set aside $1 million. Mr. Lamb said that staff will come back with further details to make sure Innovia meets all the requirements, and staff will come back for final Council allocation approval; and that he could see if Innovia would be willing to come before Council to give an overview. 7. ARPA Funds for Law Enforcement — Chief Ellis, Sgt. Bloomer Chief Ellis and Sgt Bloomer went through their PowerPoint slides explaining their requests for ARPA funds to support law enforcement. Sgt. Bloomer explained the objective statement, noted that the implementation of the Real Time Crime Center has started; that automatic license plate readers are installed along I-90 and elsewhere; mentioned the strategy to leverage technology; discussed a real time crime center including examples from other areas; said they are asking for $50,000 to hire a real time crime center project manager and said that Spokane County is also being asked to contribute matching funds; talked about pan -tilt -zoom (PTZ) traffic cameras with a $224,000 cost allocation and showed the areas on a map of where those cameras could be placed. He also discussed the automatic license plate readers and said that the cameras will provide the ability to locate and arrest known criminals; he noted no digital evidence will be retained without legal and lawful criminal justice purpose and the videos will overwrite every 14 days. Continuing to go through the PowerPoint slides, Chief Ellis noted that the $140,000 per year per detective option shown on slide 34, can be used to address gang violence issues and high level drug traffic. Concerning recorded traffic, Chief Ellis mentioned they also get input from school districts, and from the courthouse. City Manager Hohman acknowledged there is a lot of information tonight and recognizes Council will need some time to digest these before discussing allocations; he said he will work with Chief Ellis and Sgt. Bloomer to narrow some of the options and come up with costs we know will be able to be handled in the future. Mayor Haley called for a recess at 8:33 p.m.; she reconvened the meeting at 8:39 p.m. 8. Pavement Management Program — Adam Jackson, Bill Helbig, John Hohman Mr. Jackson explained that, as noted previously, the Street Sustainability Committee came back with four elements for further consideration, and tonight's discussion will focus on one of those, i.e. delivery options. Concerning the history of our maintenance contract, City Manager Hohman explained that as we moved away from contracting with the County and moved into our own street maintenance contract, there were several hundred thousand dollars of work that could be related to pavement preservation done through contract; which he said is still a bid contract, but it is now a unit cost bid, so instead of bidding on the actual project, companies would bid on the unit of work which would be split out into different categories; so it is a very efficient means for certain kinds of road work where no set of plans is necessary; what we are talking about here is use of the street wear fee money in a unit based bid; we didn't continue with that because about 10 years go Council was lobbied by someone from a different paving company, who expressed that it wasn't fair to include the extra work into the unit based contract that was with Poe Asphalt; so the policy direction given to staff at that time was to bid out everything. Mr. Hohman explained about shifting that Council Meeting Minutes, Formal: 05-10-2022 Page 4 of 7 Approved by Council: DRAFT into the CIP process that would normally be reserved for grants; said this is a potential option in moving forward for a more efficient process for project delivery. Mr. Jackson went over the slides showing the different delivery factors including delivery time and staff time before and after the project, and design time. Mr. Helbig noted that the street wear fee for the pavement preservation is a good project to try to take to a unit cost contract; said staff is looking to do a pavement preservation contract similar to the existing multi -year pavement maintenance contract; that staff would be considering adding a second contract of that type, bid out as a unit contract price up to what we have allocated in the 106 fund for local street preservation, and manage that pavement with that type of contract rather than through the CIP group, which would result in significant time and cost savings. Mr. Helbig said we would likely do this as part of the budget consideration; and said staff is looking for Council input/feedback on moving forward on this type of contract to do local street preservation work. There was general Council positive comments toward moving in this direction and that they would like to see a second contract. At 8:58 p.m. it was moved by Deputy Mayor Higgins, seconded and agreed to extend the meeting up to an additional 30 minutes, or up to 9:30 p.m. 9. CenterPlace Operations— John Hohman, Erik Lamb City Manager Hohman started by explaining that this started by Council asking for a discussion on fees; but that things have changed in subsequent months, including the resignation of the individual who was responsible for operating and managing CenterPlace; that we have had some discussions through the TPA (Tourism Promotion Act Committee) with some hoteliers who suggested the idea of looking at a third party or a private management company for the management of the facility; all of which led to thoughts about how is the facility currently operating, which is a natural precursor to a discussion about fees; including researching the potential if there might be an individual or company who might be interested in operating the facility. Mr. Hohman said in general, the facility looses about $400,000 annually; that the facility has a lot of capacity and is normally not booked to capacity. Mr. Hohman said through the connections with one of the hoteliers, staff contacted a potential company which operates a similar facility in the Salt Lake Area; said staff is also examining the definition of the facility and what does Council see as its use, whether that is a community center, conference center, or other ideas; so tonight is an opportunity to discuss these issues so that Council can determine what does Council want it to be, and what was the original idea for the facility, and whether Council wants to keep the facility as it is with an in-house management, or to go to an outside company or other options; and that staff did not want to fill the vacant position until we had an opportunity to discuss the issues with Council. Mr. Lamb added that staff is not seeking anything definitive on this issue, but tonight is an opportunity to gage Council's interest. Mr. Hohman brought attention to the graphic showing that 60% of usage is meetings and seminars with other categories used for lesser reasons. After Council discussion of the issues, it was determined that Council would like to hear more information, is open to the idea of a private contractor, agrees it would be great if we could stop loosing money and have the building used more; mention from Councilmember Wick that he doesn't want a convention center but would also be interested to see how many nights/days it is used and what is the potentials for more rentals; comment from Councilmember Woodard that the senior center is not the most efficient use of that area, and most agreed that a third party could help us identify the uses for the facility. 10. Senior Center Agreement — John Bottelli Director Bottelli said that this agenda item is being brought forward at the initial request of Councilmember Woodard. Mr. Bottelli then went over some of the terms of the agreement, as noted in his Request for Council Action form. Councilmember Woodard stated that buses do not go to CenterPlace and the Senior Center; and that anyone with a walker or a wheelchair has to go about 1,000 feet to get there; said if the Seniors Organization wants to grow, they need to be more centrally located where there is bus service; said there are about 27,000 people over the age of 62 in Spokane Valley and the organization has about 900 to 1100 members, said they should have 10,000 and a center should be full of activities and programs; said the seniors appreciate the organization and its activities but there is a limited number of people who can get there. Councilmember Woodard said past discussions included having the senior center at the library, but that is no longer a possibility; said that if a senior facility were somewhere in this general neighborhood Council Meeting Minutes, Formal: 05-10-2022 Page 5 of 7 Approved by Council: DRAFT with available bus routes, there would be a tremendous increase and ease of access for the seniors; he said Council does not want to take away the Senior Organization's contract, rather, he would like to provide them with something better to meet their needs other then CenterPlace, because that part of the building doesn't meet the City's needs to rent out after hours, in an efficient way; said if 25% to 30% of the building is only used in one way, because of the set-up of the seniors, that part of the building is used very little after the time allocated for the senior center. To clarify, Mr. Bottelli added that paratransit does deliver a number of citizens to the door; and the fireside lounge is very busy on weekends. Councilmember Peetz said CenterPlace is a community center; that she is aware that seniors don't want to move but the previous agenda item showed that the building isn't being used to its full potential, so she's not sure why the seniors would be an issue; mentioned that 900 is a large number, that she would like to hear more from the seniors about what they think about this discussion. Councilmember Hattenburg agreed with Councilmember Peetz' statements, and said that he too would like to hear from the seniors. Councilmember Wick mentioned that the previous senior center building by Mission Park was in a bad state of repairs; that the senior center was a core element when CenterPlace was being discussed conceptually; said that space was designed for them, and if we want another facility, he is not sure we would have the budget to build another facility. To clarify, Deputy Mayor Higgins said Council is not talking about moving the senior center, but that this was brought forward in response to Council asking for information. Mayor Haley said she agreed that this conversation is not about that, but that every time this topic is discussed at a Council meeting, she gets calls from seniors who tell her they do not want to move; she said that we would never get even 50% of the eligible seniors at any senior center; and she agreed that 900 is a pretty good number; said they don't want to be in the library nor do they want to be on Sprague; that paratransit takes them to the door and some drivers even walk the seniors into the building. There was no further discussion. 11. Advance Agenda — Mayor Haley Councilmember Padden suggested adding Castle Park on the advance agenda to discuss the idea of changing that into single family housing, and a majority of Councilmembers agreed. Councilmember Peetz said she would like more information about noticing requirements when it comes to development, and a majority of Councilmembers agreed with Mr. Hohman's suggestion that staff include that information as an 'info only' item on a future agenda. Councilmember Wick suggested a presentation about the County Wide Planning Policy goals and it was agreed to perhaps have such a presentation after July. At 9:30 p.m., it was moved by Deputy Mayor Higgins, seconded and unanimously agreed to extend the meeting to 9:35 p.m. 12. Finance Depaitnient Monthly Report The Finance Department monthly report was for information only and was not reported or discussed. CITY MANAGER COMMENTS: Mr. Hohman extended congratulations to Officer Pratt as Lilac Festival's Officer of the year, and he also extended congratulations to Police Chief Ellis; said the NEPA (National Environmental Policy Act) process for the Pines Grade Separation Project is now complete and we can move on to picking up the rest of the right-of-way; he reminded everyone that there will be no meeting next Tuesday, May 17 as some members of Council are headed to Washington, D.C. Mr. Hohman also noted that effective June 1, we will not necessarily need to meet by zoom, and that more discussion on this will be forthcoming. And lastly, Mr. Hohman noted the employee appreciation lunch is tomorrow and he told Council if they have time, they are welcome to come and maybe offer some remarks. EXECUTIVE SESSION: 13. Executive Session: [RCW 42.30.110(1)(b), and(1)(g)] Acquisition of Real Estate; Review Performance of a Public Employee It was moved by Deputy Mayor Higgins, seconded and unanimously agreed to adjourn into executive session for approximately 20 minutes to discuss acquisition of real estate, and also to review the Council Meeting Minutes, Formal: 05-10-2022 Page 6 of 7 Approved by Council: DRAFT performance of a public employee, and that no action will be taken upon return to open session. Council adjourned into executive session at 9:32 p.m. At approximately 9:55 p.m., Mayor Haley declared Council out of executive session, at which time it was moved, seconded, and unanimously agreed to adjourn. ATTEST: Pam Haley, Mayor Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Council Meeting Minutes, Formal: 05-10-2022 Page 7 of 7 Approved by Council: CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: May 24, 2022 Department Director Approval Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ® new business ❑ public hearing ❑information ❑ admin. Report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Second Reading Proposed Ordinance 22-006; 2022 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendments. GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 36.70A, SVMC 17.80.140 and 19.30.010. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: On December 13, 2016, City Council approved Ordinance 16-018 adopting the Comprehensive Plan and associated development regulations as required every eight years. On November 23, 2021, the City Council approved the 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Docket. On May 3, 2022, the Council agreed by consensus to have the proposed Ordinance presented for first reading. BACKGROUND: The GMA (Growth Management Act) allows local jurisdictions to consider amendments to their Comprehensive Plans once each year. The City codified this process in Section 17.80.140 of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC). Consistent with the SVMC, staff published notice on August 20 and 27, 2021, advising the public of the annual amendment process and that the City would accept applications for the 2022 cycle through November 1, 2021. On November 23, 2021, the City Council approved the 2022 Docket. The Docket includes four proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan: three site specific map amendments and an amendment to Figure 27 adding a proposed shared use path. On January 14, 2022, the City issued Determinations of Non -significance (DNS) for the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendments pursuant to Title 21, Environmental Controls of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code. On February 11 and 18, 2022, notice for a public hearing on the proposed amendments was placed in the Spokane Valley News Herald the City's official newspaper. Beginning on February 17, 2022, each site subject to an amendment was posted with a "Notice of Public Hearing" sign with a description of the proposal and information on the public hearing. On February 24, 2022, the Planning Commission held a study session on the proposed 2022 Comprehensive Plan amendments. A public hearing on the proposed amendments was held March 10, 2022. Following the public hearing, the Planning Commission deliberated on each CPA and voted as follows: • The Planning Commission voted 6-1 to forward to City Council a recommendation to approve CPA- 2022-01 and CPA-2022-03. • The Planning Commission voted 7-0 to forward to City Council a recommendation to approve CPA- 2022-02 and CPA-2022-04. An Administrative Report was presented to City Council on May 3, 2022. The Council agreed by consensus to have the proposed Ordinance presented for first reading. On May 10, 2022, City Council passed a motion to advance Ordinance 22-006 to a second reading. The draft Ordinance under consideration identifies findings to approve each of the proposed amendments are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan goals and policies, the GMA, and the SVMC. Note that City Council adopted amendments to its Governance Manual that provide that Council will not take public comment on items that have already had a public hearing, such as the Comprehensive Plan amendments presented in proposed Ordinance 22-006. 1 of 2 BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: None OPTIONS: Move to approve Ordinance No. 22-006, or take other appropriate action. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to approve Ordinance No. 22-006, Comprehensive Plan Amendments as proposed. STAFF CONTACT: Chaz Bates, AICP, Planning Manager ATTACHMENTS: Draft Ordinance No. 22-006 with attachments Yellow Binder previously distributed 2 of 2 Draft CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 22-006 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; AND PROVIDING FOR OTHER MATTERS PROPERLY RELATING THERETO. WHEREAS, pursuant to Spokane Valley Ordinance No. 16-018, the City of Spokane Valley adopted the Comprehensive Plan, Capital Facilities Plan, and maps as the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Spokane Valley (the Comprehensive Plan); and WHEREAS, comprehensive plans may be amended annually pursuant to RCW 36.70A.130 of the Growth Management Act (GMA); and WHEREAS, amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan may be initiated by the Planning Commission (Commission), the City Council (Council), citizens, or by the Community and Public Works Director based on citizen requests or when changed conditions warrant adjustments; and WHEREAS, the GMA requires comprehensive plans to be implemented with development regulations, including the zoning of all properties in the City that are consistent with land use map designations; and WHEREAS, the City adopted Public Participation Guidelines to direct the public involvement process for adopting and amending comprehensive plans; and WHEREAS, the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) provides that amendment applications shall be received prior to November 1 of each year; and WHEREAS, applications were submitted by the applicant, owner, or by City staff to amend the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map for the purpose of beneficially using the property described herein; and WHEREAS, on November 23, 2021, City Council approved the 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Docket; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the State Environmental Protection Act chapter 43.21C RCW (SEPA) and chapter 21.20 SVMC, staff conducted an environmental review to determine the potential environmental impacts from the proposed amendments; and WHEREAS, on January 14, 2022, after reviewing the environmental checklists, staff issued a Determination of Non -Significance (DNS) for each of the proposals, published the DNS in the Valley News Herald, and where appropriate posted the DNS on the sites and mailed the DNS to all affected public agencies; and WHEREAS, on January 19, 2022, the Washington State Depaitnient of Commerce was notified pursuant to RCW 36.70A.106 of the City's intent to adopt amendments to the Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, on February 11 and 18, 2022, notice of the Commission public hearing was published in the Valley News Herald the City's official newspaper; and Ordinance 22-006: 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Page 1 of 10 Draft WHEREAS, on February 16, 2022, notice of the Commission hearing was mailed to all property owners within 400 feet of the subject properties; and WHEREAS, on February 17, 2022, notice of the Commission hearing had been posted on all the subject properties; and WHEREAS, on February 24, 2022, the Commission conducted a study session to review the proposed amendments; and WHEREAS, on March 10, 2022, the Commission received evidence, information, public testimony, and a staff report and recommendation at a public hearing; and WHEREAS, on March 24, 2022, the Commission deliberated and voted to forward CPA-2022-01, CPA-2022-02, CPA-2022-03, and CPA-2022-04, to Council with a recommendation for approval, with written findings of fact setting forth the bases for such recommendations to Council; and WHEREAS, on May 3, 2022, Council conducted a briefing to review the proposed amendments; and WHEREAS, on May 3, 2022, Council concurred to place CPA-2022-01, CPA-2022-02, CPA-2022-03, and CPA-2022-04 in an ordinance for consideration of approval; and WHEREAS, on May 10, 2022, Council considered a first ordinance reading to approve CPA-2022-01, CPA-2022-02, CPA-2022-03, and CPA-2022-04; and WHEREAS, on May 24, 2022, Council considered a second ordinance reading to adopt the proposed amendments for CPA-2022-01, CPA-2022-02, CPA-2022-03, and CPA-2022-04. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley do ordain as follows: Section 1. Purpose. The purpose of this Ordinance is to amend the Comprehensive Plan as described in CPA-2022-01, CPA-2022-02, CPA-2022-03, and CPA-2022-04. Section 2. Findings. Council acknowledges that the Commission conducted appropriate investigation and study and held a public hearing on the proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan. Council has considered the Commission's findings. Council makes and adopts findings specific to each Comprehensive Plan amendment as set forth in Section 4 below. The Council hereby makes and adopts the following general findings applicable to all proposed amendments: General Findings: 1. Pursuant to chapter 43.21C RCW (SEPA), environmental checklists were required for each proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment. 2. Staff reviewed the environmental checklists and a threshold determination was made for each proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment. 3. On January 14, 2022, Determination of Non -Significance (DNS) was issued for the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendments. 4. On January 14, 2022, the DNS was published in the City's official newspaper, the Valley News Herald, pursuant to chapter 21.20 SVMC. Ordinance 22-006: 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Page 2 of 10 Draft 5. The procedural requirements of SEPA and Title 21 SVMC have been fulfilled. 6. On January 19, 2022, the Washington State Department of Commerce was provided a notice of intent to adopt amendments to the Comprehensive Plan. 7. On February 16, 2022, individual notices of public hearing for the proposed site -specific map amendments were mailed to all property owners within 400 feet of each affected site. 8. On February 17, 2022 each site subject to a proposed site -specific amendment was posted with a "Notice of Public Hearing" sign, with a description of the proposal. 9. On February 11 and 18, 2022, notice of the Commission public hearing was published in the Valley News Herald. 10. The procedural requirements in SVMC 17.80.140 for the amendment process, including public participation, notice, and public hearing requirements have been met. 11. On March 10, 2022, the Commission held a public hearing on each of the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendments. After receiving public testimony, the public hearing was closed. 12. On March 24, 2022, the Commission deliberated and voted to forward CPA-2022-01, CPA- 2022-02, CPA-2022-03, and CPA-2022-04, to Council with a recommendation for approval. 13. The Commission adopted findings for CPA-2022-01, CPA-2022-02, CPA-2022-03, and CPA- 2022-04. Such findings were presented to Council. Specific findings adopted and made by City Council for each Comprehensive Plan Amendment request are contained in Section 4, below. 14. The Commission and Council have reviewed the proposed amendments concurrently to evaluate the cumulative impacts. The review was consistent with the annual amendment process pursuant to SVMC 17.80.140 and chapter 36.70A RCW. 15. The proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan are consistent with GMA and do not result in internal inconsistencies within the Comprehensive Plan itself. Section 3. Property. The properties subject to this Ordinance are described in Attachment "A" (2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Maps). Section 4. Comprehensive Plan and Map Amendments. Pursuant to RCW 36.70A.130, the Comprehensive Plan is hereby amended as set forth below and in Attachment "A". The Comprehensive Plan amendments are generally described as follows: Comprehensive Plan and Map Amendments: File No. CPA-2022-01: Proposal: A request to change the Comprehensive Clan designation and zoning for 1.03 acres Single Family Residential (SFR) to Multifamily Residential (MFR). Applicant: Land Use Entitlement Solutions, Dwight Hume Ordinance 22-006: 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Page 3 of 10 Draft Amendment Location: Parcels 45204.1436 and 45204.1435; SE 1/4 of Section 20, Township 25 North, Range 44 East, Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washington. Council adopts and makes the following Findings for CPA-2022-01: 1. This proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to the public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment. The City continues to see increasing population growth with 2020 Census estimates showing a population of just over 104,500; in 2016 the estimate from the Office of Financial Management was 94,160. More recently, the City adopted a Housing Action Plan that shows that seniors (age 65+) are continuing to increase their share of the City's population. This age group includes those in need of assisted living arrangements. Based on conversations with the applicant Sunshine Health, they are requesting a change to MFR to meet future demand for multifamily development that can accommodate an assisted living facility near their existing facility to the west. The proposed change helps meet existing and future demand, helps protect the environment by building in a developed area, and helps Sunshine Health meet a needed public service in a cost-efficient manner. 2. This proposed amendment is consistent with chapter 36.70A RCW and with the portion of the City's adopted Comprehensive Plan not affected by the amendment. The GMA adopts 14 goals to guide the development of local comprehensive plans and development regulations. The request allows opportunity to provide an assisted living facility adjacent to an existing development owned by the same entity. There are no transportation improvements planned adjacent to the site within the planning horizon of 2037. The proposal does not conflict with any other GMA goals. The amendment is not in conflict with any other portions of the Comprehensive Plan. 3. This proposed amendment is not in response to a change in conditions beyond the property owner's control. 4. This proposed amendment is not in response to or to correct an obvious mapping error. The City has experienced continued population growth, especially in age segments that often seek multifamily developments (millennials and seniors). Increasing opportunity for multifamily development in areas that are supported by existing infrastructure provides an opportunity to meet adopted goals, policies, and strategies for housing needs. This proposed amendment provides an additional tool and opportunity to meet the City's housing needs. The Comprehensive Plan identifies the following goals and policy that support the proposed change: a. H-G2 Enable the development of affordable housing for all income levels. b. CF-P2 Optimize the use of existing public facilities before investing in new facilities 5. The change to MFR would allow for expanded uses including multifamily housing and assisted living facilities. The properties would have the opportunity to transition, add density and add different uses including assisted living facilities. There is no concern for the effect on the physical environment. 6. There are no known critical areas associated with the site, such as wetlands, fish and wildlife habitat areas, frequently flooded areas or geologically hazardous areas. The parcel is not located within the shoreline jurisdiction, and there are no known surface water quality or quantity issues. Chapter 21.40 SVMC will ensure adequate protection of critical areas. 7. The parcels are currently vacant. A multifamily building was previously located on the northern parcel but was demolished in 2017. The adjacent use to the west is the existing Sunshine Health facility that provides a variety of health -related services including assisted living. West of the existing Sunshine Health facility is Valley Christian School; to the north, east, and south are single-family residences. All the properties except for the existing Sunshine Health facility are designated Single Family Residential and zoned R-3. If the amendment is approved any future development would be subject to the City's transitional provision. Ordinance 22-006: 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Page 4 of 10 Draft 8. Raymond Road and 10th and 1 lth Avenues are Local Access streets. There are no planned transportation projects in the area. The nearest City recreational facility is Appleway Trail, approximately 1/2 mile to the north. The closest formal City park is Balfour Park, approximately one mile to the north. A project on the site would be considered infill development. As such, the expansion of allowed uses and increased densities are supported by the infrastructure that is in place. Various Planning Commission members had concerns regarding adequacy of on -street parking in the area and its ability to support future uses allowed in the MFR. Future development of the site will be subject to development regulations in place at the time of development. 9. This proposed change would allow the property to increase density and support infill development in an area planned for urban growth. The change will support the identified need for housing. The change benefits the neighborhood, City, and region by supporting the following adopted Comprehensive Plan goals: a. H-GI Allow for a broad range of housing opportunities to meet the needs of the community. b. H-G2 Enable the development of affordable housing for all income levels. 10. This proposal would add approximately one acre of MFR property. The MFR designation in this location would allow for increased options for development including an assisted living facility in an area adjacent to an existing facility. The proposal is limited to a reasonable area and impacts to adjacent Single Family Residential zones would be mitigated by the adopted transitional provisions. 11. Currently, the site allows for 8 dwelling units per acre. If the proposal is approved, it would allow for up to 22 dwelling units per acre, a net increase of up to 14 dwelling units. The proposed change would have little impact on overall population density. 12. The MFR designation would support the goals and policies identified above. The amendment will have no effect on other elements of the Comprehensive Plan, including Housing, Capital Facilities and Public Services, Public and Private Utilities, Parks and Open Space and Natural Resources. 13. The criteria of SVMC 17.80.140(H) are met by the amendment. Council Decision: Change the designation for parcel numbers 45204.1436 and 45204.1435 to Multiple Family Residential (MFR). File No. CPA-2022-02: Proposal: A request to change land use designation and zoning for.45 acres from Single Family Residential to Parks and Open Space. Applicant: City of Spokane Valley. Amendment Location: Parcel: 55073.0458; SW 1/4 of Section 07, Township 25 North, Range 45 East, Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washington Council adopts and makes the following Findings for CPA-2022-02: 1. This proposed amendment to change the designation for .45 acres from SFR to P/OS bears a substantial relationship to the public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment. In 2021, the City purchased the parcel from Spokane County for the river loop trail project and for future access improvements to the Centennial Trail at Flora Road for the purpose of expanding / increasing access to the City's park lands. This area was generally identified as New Park Area 6 in the 2019 Parks and Recreation Master Plan. These plans were developed through an extensive community engagement process. Additionally, the expansion is necessary to achieve the adopted Level of Service (LOS) 3.25 acres of park land for every 1,000 residents. 2. This proposed amendment is consistent with chapter 36.70A RCW and with the portion of the City's adopted Comprehensive Plan not affected by the amendment. The GMA adopts fourteen goals to guide the development of local comprehensive plans and development regulations. The proposal is consistent with the GMA goals to enhance recreational opportunities and develop parks Ordinance 22-006: 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Page 5 of 10 Draft and recreation facilities. Additionally, the GMA requires a Parks and Recreation element to be a part of the adopted comprehensive plan. The City's Comprehensive Plan adopts the Parks Plan by reference. This proposed amendment will not have unanticipated impacts on other areas of the Comprehensive Plan. 3. This proposed amendment does not respond to a substantial change in conditions beyond the property owner's control applicable to the area within which the subject property lies. 4. This proposed amendment is not in response to or to correct an obvious mapping error. 5. This proposed amendment will address a documented deficiency of park land in the Comprehensive Plan. 6. The change to P/OS will not impact the physical environment. The change will result in less intensive uses than are currently allowed in SFR reducing the potential effects on the physical environment. 7. According to the City's Critical Area map, the parcel is not impacted by any known critical areas, such as wetlands, fish and wildlife habitat areas, geologically hazardous areas or frequently flooded areas. The parcel is located within shoreline jurisdiction and designated in the Shoreline Master Program as Shoreline Residential Upland. There are no known surface water quality or quantity issues. Chapter 21.40 SVMC and chapter 21.50 SVMC will ensure that adequate protection of the critical areas and adjacent land shorelands are addressed at the time of future development. 8. This proposed amendment is compatible with the surrounding land uses. Future development of the park space will remedy a documented need and location identified in the 2019 Parks and Recreation Master Plan. 9. Sewer and water are available to the site. The nearest formal park is Greenacres Park approximately 1.25 miles to the southeast, the Centennial Trail is immediately to the north, and across the Spokane River is the newly acquired Flora Park property. The proposal will increase park land and allow future development to access the newly -acquired Flora Park property as part of the north river loop trail proposal. The site is served by Flora Road, an Urban Major Collector. The existing and forecast Level of Service (LOS) for Flora Road at this location is A-C which is within the adopted LOS; Montgomery Avenue at this location is a local access street and does not have an adopted LOS. There are no planned capacity or preservation projects planned in this area. 10. This proposed amendment will provide benefits to the neighborhood and City by providing an opportunity to provide access to planned improvements on the north side of the Spokane River. 11. The quantity and location of park land is planned for and needed as identified in the Parks Plan. An access point at this location furthers the goals of the Parks Plan and Comprehensive Plan and would provide easy access for pedestrians and bicycles. 12. The proposed change would have minimal impact on projected population density. 13. The proposal will not have an impact on other aspects of the Comprehensive Plan. In addition to meeting the goals in the Parks and Recreation Master Plan the proposed amendment addresses the following goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan: a. LU-G2 Provide for land uses that are essential to Spokane Valley residents, employees, and visitors. b. LU-P18 Enable public open spaces. c. P-GI Develop, grow, and maintain a diverse and accessible park, recreation, trail, and open space system that enhances community character. d. P-P5 Design parks and community facilities to provide easy access for pedestrians, bicycles, autos, and public transit. e. P-P8 Plan for access to parks, trails, and other open spaces in all neighborhoods. 14. The criteria of SVMC 17.80.140(H) are met by the amendment. Council Decision: Change the designation for parcel number 55073.0458 to Parks and Open Space (P/OS). Ordinance 22-006: 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Page 6 of 10 Draft File No. CPA-2022-03: Proposal: A request to change land use designation and zoning for 17.64 acres from Single Family Residential to Parks and Open Space.. Applicant: City of Spokane Valley Amendment Location: 44041.0104; 44041.0103; 44041.0102; 44041.9048; 44041.9046; and 44041.9007; NE 1/4 of Section 04, Township 24 North, Range 44 East, Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washington. Council adopts and makes the following Findings for CPA-2022-03: 1. This proposed amendment to change the designation for 17.64 acres from SFR to P/OS bears a substantial relationship to the public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment. In 2021, the City purchased six parcels southeast of the intersection of 44th Avenue and Bates Road for the purpose of expanding the City's park lands. This area was identified as New Park Area 3 in the 2019 Parks and Recreation Master Plan, which was developed through an extensive community engagement process. Additionally, the expansion is necessary to maintain the adopted Level of Service (LOS) 3.25 acres of park land for every 1,000 residents. 2. This proposed amendment is consistent with chapter 36.70A RCW and with the portion of the City's adopted Comprehensive Plan not affected by the amendment. The GMA adopts fourteen goals to guide the development of local comprehensive plans and development regulations. This proposal is consistent with the GMA goals to enhance recreational opportunities and develop parks and recreation facilities. Additionally, the GMA requires a Parks and Recreation element to be a part of the adopted comprehensive plan. The City's Comprehensive Plan adopts the Parks Plan by reference. The proposed amendment will not have unanticipated impacts on other areas of the Comprehensive Plan 3. This proposed amendment does not respond to a substantial change in conditions beyond the property owner's control applicable to the area within which the subject property lies. 4. This proposed amendment is not in response to or to correct an obvious mapping error. 5. This proposed amendment will address a documented deficiency of park land in the Comprehensive Plan. 6. The change to P/OS will not impact the physical environment. The change will result in less intensive uses than are currently allowed in SFR reducing the potential effects on the physical environment. 7. According to the City's Critical Area map, the eastern parcels are within a Geological Hazardous area identified as Quaternary Alluvium, development of the site may require additional report or studies. There are no known other critical areas associated with the site, such as wetlands, fish and wildlife habitat areas, or frequently flooded areas. The parcels are not located within shoreline jurisdiction, and there are no known surface water quality or quantity issues. Chapter 21.40 SVMC will ensure that adequate protection of the critical areas and adjacent land use are addressed at the time of future development. 8. This proposed amendment is compatible with the surrounding land uses. Future development of the park space will provide a documented need and location identified in the 2019 Parks and Recreation Master Plan. 9. Sewer and water are available to the site. The nearest formal park is Castle Park approximately 2 miles to the north, the Glenrose Unit of Dishman Hills is approximately 1.5 miles to west. The proposal will increase park land and future development will enhance the park system helping maintain the adopted LOS. 10. This proposed amendment will provide benefits to the neighborhood and City by providing an opportunity to provide park space to the neighborhood. The expansion of park space in this area will help the City meet its adopted LOS for park land. Ordinance 22-006: 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Page 7 of 10 Draft A minority of the Planning Commission had concerns with the potential location of a new fire station across the street from the existing fire station and the potential impact on the newly acquired park property. 11. The quantity and location of park land is planned for and needed as identified in the Parks Plan. A neighborhood park at this location furthers the goals of the Parks Plan and Comprehensive Plan. The site provides easy access for pedestrians, bicycles, and automobiles. 12. This proposed change would have minimal impact on projected population density. 13. The proposal will not have an impact on other aspects of the Comprehensive Plan. In addition to meeting the goals in the Parks and Recreation Master Plan the proposed amendment addresses the following goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan: a. LU-G2 Provide for land uses that are essential to Spokane Valley residents, employees, and visitors. b. LU-P18 Enable public open spaces. c. P-GI Develop, grow, and maintain a diverse and accessible park, recreation, trail, and open space system that enhances community character. d. P-P5 Design parks and community facilities to provide easy access for pedestrians, bicycles, autos, and public transit. e. P-P8 Plan for access to parks, trails, and other open spaces in all neighborhoods. 14. The criteria of SVMC 17.80.140(H) are met by the amendment. Council Decision: Change the designation for parcel numbers 44041.0104; 44041.0103; 44041.0102; 44041.9048; 44041.9046; and 44041.9007 to Parks and Open Space (P/OS). File No.: CPA-2022-04 Proposal: A request to amend Figure 27 — Bikeway Network to add north river loop trail. Applicant: City of Spokane Valley, 10210 East Sprague Avenue, Spokane Valley, WA 99206. Amendment Location: Citywide Council adopts and makes the following Findings for CPA-2022-04: 1. This proposed amendment amends Figure 27 — Existing and Recommended Bicycle Facilities. Figure 27 identifies planned shared use paths. In 2019 the City updated the Park and Recreation Master Plan, which identified a potential New Park Area 6 for a new community park on the north bank of the Spokane River between Flora and Barker Road, as well as a potential trail running from Plante's Ferry to the new park. In 2021, the City acquired approximately 45 acres of north bank property for a new park. This proposed amendment formally adopts the proposed north river loop trail into the Comprehensive Plan as contemplated in the Park and Recreation Master Plan. The public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment are furthered by ensuring the Comprehensive Plan is reflective of regional policy and current with other plans. 2. This proposed amendment is consistent with the requirements of chapter 36.70A RCW and with the portion of the City's adopted Comprehensive Plan not affected by the amendment. The (GMA) adopts fourteen goals to guide the development of local comprehensive plans and development regulations. This proposal is consistent with the GMA goals to enhance recreational opportunities and develop parks and recreation facilities. Additionally, the GMA requires a Parks and Recreation element to be a part of the adopted comprehensive plan. The City's Comprehensive Plan adopts the Parks Plan by reference. This proposed amendment will not have unanticipated impacts on other areas of the Comprehensive Plan 3. This proposed amendment does not respond to a substantial change in conditions beyond the property owner's control. 4. This proposed amendment is not in response to an obvious mapping error. However, with the adoption of the Parks and Recreation Master Plan in 2019 and the property acquisition of the Ordinance 22-006: 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Page 8 of 10 Draft Flora property in 2021, the proposed amendment will add the north river loop trail as discussed in the Park Plan and community engagement efforts. 5. This proposed amendment will address a documented deficiency of park land in the Comprehensive Plan. 6. This amendment is not site specific as the physical location of the trail has not been formally identified and the change would not result in effects to the natural environment. The City's critical areas provisions (chapter 21.40 SVMC) and shoreline master program (chapter 21.50 SVMC) will ensure that adequate protection of the critical areas and adjacent shorelands are addressed at the time of future development. There are no known surface water quality or quantity issues. 7. The proposed policies will not have a direct effect on open space, streams, rivers, or lakes. Chapter 21.40 SVMC will ensure that adequate protection of the critical areas and adjacent land use are addressed for any future development. 8. This proposed amendment is compatible with the surrounding land uses. Generally, the potential location of the trail is within park designated property. 9. This is a non -site -specific amendment. While the exact location of the potential trail has not been identified, the availability of sewer and water vary, certain potential trailheads may have public services. It is expected that the trail, should it be developed, would function in a similar fashion as the Centennial Trail, with some areas remote and lacking services while others are accessible with public services available. 10. This proposed amendment will provide benefits to the neighborhood and City by providing an opportunity to provide access to the Spokane River and recreational opportunities along on the north side of the Spokane River. 11. The City has not adopted a Level -of -Service (LOS) ratio for trails; however, the 2019 Park and Recreation Master Plan identifies that the City will take advantage of recreational opportunities as they arise, and the Comprehensive Plan identifies access to the Spokane River as an opportunity. This location along the north bank of the Spokane River offers a unique chance to take advantage of this opportunity. 12. The proposed amendment will not have an impact on current or projected population. 13. The proposal will not have an impact on other aspects of the Comprehensive Plan. In addition to meeting the goals in the Parks and Recreation Master Plan the proposed amendment addresses the following goals, policies, and strategy of the Comprehensive Plan: a. LU-G2 Provide for land uses that are essential to Spokane Valley residents, employees, and visitors. b. LU-P18 Enable public open spaces. c. P-GI Develop, grow, and maintain a diverse and accessible park, recreation, trail, and open space system that enhances community character. d. P-P5 Design parks and community facilities to provide easy access for pedestrians, bicycles, autos, and public transit. e. P-P8 Plan for access to parks, trails, and other open spaces in all neighborhoods. f. Strategy: Evaluate the feasibility of developing a public park along the Spokane River 14. The criteria of SVMC 17.80.140(H) are met by the amendment. Council Decision: Amend Figure 27 — Bikeway Network map to add the north river loop trail. Section 5. Map - Copies on File -Administrative Action. The Comprehensive Plan (with maps) is maintained in the office of the City Clerk as well as the City Department of Community and Public Works. The City Manager or designee, following adoption of this Ordinance, is authorized to modify the Ordinance 22-006: 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Page 9 of 10 Draft Comprehensive Plan (including maps) in a manner consistent with this Ordinance, including correcting scriveners errors. Section 6. Liability. The express intent of the City is that the responsibility for compliance with the provisions of this Ordinance shall rest with the permit applicant and their agents. This Ordinance and its provisions are adopted with the express intent to protect the health, safety, and welfare of the general public and are not intended to protect any particular class of individuals or organizations. Section 7. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause, or phrase of this Ordinance shall be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause, or phrase of this Ordinance. Section 8. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect five days after publication of this Ordinance or a summary thereof in the official newspaper of the City as provided by law. PASSED by the City Council this day of May, 2022. ATTEST: Pam Haley, Mayor Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Approved as to form: Office of the City Attorney Date of Publication: Effective Date: Ordinance 22-006: 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Page 10 of 10 Attachment "A", Ordinance 22-006 Proposed Comprehensive Plan Map E 9th Ave S Raymond Rd E 13th Ave E 10th Ave E Ilth Ave S Oberlin Rd Legend C M U •V1V1V1V11 M F R MU IMU I NC 1 E 9th Ave E 10th Ave N CD cn o. E.11th-Ln_ E 12th Ave i POS RC SFR N �LJ 1 I I 0 50 100 200 300 400 Feet File: CPA-2022-01 Owner: SHFI Properties (Sunshine Health) Parcel(s): 45204.1436 and 45204.1435 Address: 10506 E 10th and Unaddressed Request: Proposed change: Comp Plan Map: SFR to MFR Zoning Map: R-3 to MFR Proposed Comprehensive Plan Map Spokane River Parks Centennial E Knox L-n E Indiana Ave File: CPA-2022-02 Owner: Spokane Valley Parcel(s): 55073.0458 Address: 17105 E Montgomery Ave E Mansfield_ Ave E Knox Ave Legend CMU 111111111111111111111111111111 MFR POS MU RC IMU NC SFR �J I I 0 50 100 200 300 400 Feet Request: Proposed change: Comp Plan Map: SFR to P/OS Zoning Map: R-2 to P/OS Proposed Comprehensive Plan Map E 44th Ave E 47th Ave Ei 46th Ave S Bates Rd .E 47th Ct ct s co E Thorpe Rd Legend CMU 11111111 MFR POS MU RC IMU ' NC SFR rLJ 1 I I 0 50 100 200 300 400 Feet File: CPA-2022-03 Owner: Spokane Valley, 10210 E Sprague Parcel(s): 44041.0104, 44041.0103, 44041.0102, 44041.9048, 44041.9046, 44041.9007 Address: Unaddressed Request: Comp Plan Map: SFR to POS Zoning Map: R-2 to POS E Valley Springs Rd Camp Sekani Park F,rederick,Ave Felts Field Spokan z w 8th Avey� /E, 29th Ave E 37th Ave Spokane County Spokane County 5 E Euclid Ave mood Millwo E Upriver D E Montggrn Dr E ontgormery Av E ansfield Dishman Hills Natural Area Dishman Hills Conservation Area Iller Creek Conservation Area E 44th Ave Mirabeau Point Park E 16th Ave E 32nd Ave E £ th Ave <ro 2 EWellesleyAve Ilivan rk Morrow Park Natural Area Spokan County E S2nd-Ave' r/ 2 E Broadwa Figure 27 Map of Exisiting and Spokane County Recommended Bicyle Facilities Euclid Av Proposed Amendment E Wellesley Proposed Shared Use Path Existing & Proposed Bikeway Network Municipal Boundaries Spokane Valley E Mission Ave EMIs: Liberty L. Mad oAve e country vler< %/ Saltesg Upl an, Conservation Ai V//I Spokane Valley Urban Growth Area (UGA) Parks, Recreation, & Open Space Bikeway Elements — Existing Bike Lane Existing Shared Use Path — Bike Friendly Route Existing Ped/Bike Bridge • Proposed Bike Lane •..t Proposed Ped/Bike Bridge Proposed Shared Use Path 0 0.5 1 " OMiles City of Spokane Valley 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Index Tab No. Contents 1 Request for Council Action (May 3, 2022) 2 Planning Commission Findings and Recommendations (March 24, 2022) 3 Planning Commission Minutes February 24, 2022 - Study Session March 10, 2022 - Public Hearing March 24, 2022 — Findings and Recommendations 4 Request for Planning Commission Action and Presentations February 24, 2022 - Study Session March 10, 2022 - Public Hearing March 24, 2022 — Findings and Recommendation 5 Staff Report and Exhibits for CPA-2022-01. A request to change the comprehensive plan designation and zoning for 1.03 acres Single Family Residential (SFR) to Multifamily Residential (MFR) for parcels 45204.1436 and 45204.1435 6 Staff Report and Exhibits for CPA-2022-02. A request to change land use designation and zoning for 0.45 acres from Single Family Residential (SFR) to Parks and Open Space (POS) for parcel: 55073.0458 7 Staff Report and Exhibits for CPA-2022-03. A request to change land use designation and zoning for 17.64 acres from Single Family Residential (SFR) to Parks and Open Space (POS) for parcels: 44041.0104; 44041.0103; 44041.0102; 44041.9048; 44041.9046; and 44041.9007 8 Staff Report and Exhibits for CPA-2022-04. A request to add north river loop trail GENERAL FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE SPOKANE VALLEY PLANNING COMMISSION FOR PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMEN1)NIENTS CPA-2022-01, CPA-2022-02, CPA-2022-03, and CPA-2022-04 March 24, 2022 A. Background: The Growth Management Act (GMA) allows local jurisdictions to consider amendments to their Comprehensive Plans once each year. The City codified this process in SVMC 17.80.140. Consistent with state law and the SVMC, staff published notice on August 20 and 27, 2021, advising the public of the annual amendment process and that the City would accept applications for the 2022 cycle through November 1, 2021. The notice was also sent to all agencies, organizations, and adjacent _jurisdictions that may have an interest in seeking amendments to the Comprehensive Plan. On November 23. 2021, the City Council approved the 2022 Comprehensive Plan Ainendrnent Docket. The Docket includes four proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan: three site specific map amendments and one amendment to Figure 27 - Existing and Recommended Bike Facilities map. Site specific amendments approved for a Comprehensive Plan amendment will require and receive a zoning classification amendment consistent with the new land use designation. B. Findings: 1. SVMC 17.80.140 provides the framework for the public to participate throughout the Comprehensive Plan amendment process, including notice and public hearing requirements. On January 19, 2022, the Department of Commerce was provided a notice of intent to adopt amendments to the Comprehensive Plan. 3. Pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act, chapter 43.21C RCW (SEPA). and Title 21 SVMC, environmental checklists were prepared for the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendments. 4. Staff reviewed the environmental checklists and issued a Determination of Non -Significance (DNS) for all Comprehensive Plan amendments on January 14, 2022. The DNS was not appealed. 5. The Planning Commission finds the pro c'tI, SFP'1 ;tndl Title 1 SANK` have been fulfilled. b. On February 11 and 18. 2022. notice for a pt,hlic- Ii 'ariti,z prep ss.=.1 placed in the Spokane Valley News llerald. 1'el?ru:i, ! :."::. eac7, ..ice subject to an amendment was posted v it11 ., ,icy -11 Public llcarin!:sign N\ith a description of the proposal and inlbrmatiLm tpn tllc l�l,l�l,� Ir�aring;. 7. Individual notice of the map amendment proposals were mailed to all property owners within 400 feet of each proposed site specific reap amendment. 8. The Planning Commission reviewed the proposed amendments concurrently to evaluate the cumulative impacts. The reviem was consistent w ith the annual amendment process outlined in SVMC 17.80.140 and chapter 36.70A RCW GMA). 9. On March 10, 2022, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendments. After receiving public testimony, the Planning Commission closed the public hearing and deliberated on the Comprehensive Plan Manning Con mission Findings and Recommendation CPA-2022-01, CPA-2022-02. CPA-2022.03, and C'PA-2022-i 4 Pay I of 2 amendments. While reviewing and deliberating on the Comprehensive Plan amendments. Planning Commission voted on the proposed amendments as follows: a. Cl'A-2022-01: 6-1 to forward to City Co a rt mntendation to approve. b. CPA-2022-02: 7-0 to forward to City C's r :c ' n ri i ; , l:, i, i, to approve. c. CPA-2022-03: 6-1 to forward to City C,>iln: 11 , I( urllll�:,ll it its,l t{t ,Shprove. d. CPA-2022-04: 7-0 to forward to City C'i-,in. ii r re ,,inm,.. ,lation to approve. 10. The Planning Commission hereby adopt-. :Ind incorporates findings specific to each Comprehensive Plan Apn l,l;.,cIIs „II;S 'i. (Nev :I1 1L111i11'ITt i - i )• Conclusions: The Planning Conine „n find, c•,ryn1rli:,nc\1( ! 81) I !I}t1lf — Comprehensive Plan Amendment Approval Criteria for CPA-:!!:]2-0 2-U . c f' lI A-2022-03 and CPA-2022-04. These proposed 2022 Comprehensive Plan with the goals and policies of the Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan, :Ind \\,told Ifr,tnioll the public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment. The Planning Commission hereby adopts and incorporates conclusions specific to each Comprehensive Plan Amendment as attached (see attachments 1-4). Recommendations: The Spokane Valley Planning Commission recommends the City Council approve 2022 Comprehensive Plan amendments CPA-2022-01. CPA-2022-02, CPA-2022-03, and CPA-2022-04. Approved this 24`' day of March. 2022. Robert McKinley, Chairman ATTEST Marianne Lemons, Planning Commission Secretary I'I:mnu„r ( orunmsii}n f iri1 i s atnd t<eI'r4-24122-t11 C'P:1-2 }"-02. CP:\-2022-03- u,d C P.•1-2022-04 Page 2 of 2 ATTACHMENT 1 SPECIFIC FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE SPOKANE VALLEY PLANNING COMMISSION FOR PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT - CPA-2022-01 March 24, 2021 A. Background: 1. The Growth Management Act (GMA) allows local jurisdictions to consider amendments to their Comprehensive Plans once each year. The City codified this process in SVMC 17.80.140. Consistent with state law and the SVMC, staff published notice on August 20 and 27, 2021, advising the public of the annual amendment process and that the City would accept applications for the 2022 cycle through November 1. 2021. The notice was also sent to all agencies, organizations, and adjacent jurisdictions that may have an interest in seeking amendments to the Comprehensive Plan. ?. O n November 23, 2021, the City Council approved the 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Docket. The Docket includes four proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan: three site specific map amendments and one amendment to Figure 21— Existing and Recommended Bike Facilities map. Site specific amendments approved for a Comprehensive Plan amendment will require and receive a zoning classif icat ion amendment consistent with the new land use designation. 13. Findinus: 1. fhese findings are specific to CPA-2022-01. All findings in the general Findings and Recommendations are hereby incorporated by reference into these specific findings for CPA- 2022-01. Findings required pursuant to SVMC' 17.80.1-10(11)(1): This proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to the public health, safety, welfare. and protection of the environment. The City continues to see increasing population growth with 2020 Census estimates showing a population of just over 104,500; in 2016 the estimate from the Office of Financial Management was 94,160. More recently, the City adopted a Housing Action. Plan that shows that seniors (age 65+) are continuing to increase their share of the City's population. This age group includes those in need of assisted living arrangements. Based on conversations with the applicant Sunshine Health, they are requesting a change to !VIER to meet future demand for multifamily development that can accommodate an assisted living facility near their existing facility to the west. Mc proposed change helps meet existing and future demand_ helps protect the environment by building in a developed area, and helps Sunshine Ilea It h meet a needed public service in a cost-efficient manner. 2. This proposed amendment is consistent ith the requirement, ,,I a \ I:[.'11, ;1n1c1 v it the portion of the City's adopted t_ omprehrnsive Plan not affected 1 he (i\1.\ adopts 14 goals to guide the develstpntent of local etvmprehert> e plan-aitd i, 1,)patticnt regulations. The request allows oppt riunitn to Tenn ide ten aS',ki ..i ii taeil,t_ ,iLhaeeiat to an existing development owned b� the same emit\ . I }tern are nr, transportation inpn'\ rar1Crtts planned adjacent to the site within the planninT. 'd'he proposal t.10ew not conflict with any other GMA goals. The amendment is not in conflict \\ ith any r.)tlter portions of the Comprehensive Plan. 3. This proposed amendment is not in response to a change in conditions beyond the property owner's control. 4. This proposed amendment is not in response to or corrects an obvious mapping error. The City has experienced continued population growth, especially in age segments that often seek multifamily developments (rnillennials and seniors). Increasing opportunity for multifamily Attachment 1 - Planning commission Findings and Recommendation CPA-2021.0001 Page Iof3 development in areas that are supported by existing infrastructure provides an opportunity to meet adopted goals. policies, and strategies for housing needs. This proposed amendment provides an additional tool and opportunity to meet the City's housing needs. The Comprehensive Plan identifies the fallowing goals and policy that support the proposed change: 11-G2 Enable the development of affordable housing for all income levels. CF-P2 Optimize the use of existing public facilities before investing in new facilities. Findings, for factors required pursuant ro SVMC 17.80.I40(H)(2): 5. The effect upon the physical environment: The change to MFR would allow for expanded uses including multifamily housing and assisted living facilities. The properties would have the opportunity to transition, add density and add different uses including assisted living facilities. There is no concern on effect of physical environment. 6, The effect on open space. streams. rivers, and lakes: There are no known critical areas associated with the site, such as wetlands, fish and wildlife habitat areas, frequently flooded areas or geologically hazardous areas. The parcel is not located within the shoreline jurisdiction_ and there are no known surface water quality or quantity issues. Chapter 21.40 SVMC will ensure adequate protection of critical areas. 7. The compatibility with and intl'8ct on adjacent land uses ,1ncl surrounding neitthhorhoods: The parcels are currently vacant. A nitlltilunrile building wits 11re\ ionsk located on the northern parcel but was demolished in 2017. The adjacent use to the west is the existing St111'41ine I1ealth facility that provides a variety of heaIth-rclate•cl :scn ices including assisted hvint. It est or the existing Sunshine Health facility is Palley Christian School: to the north. cast, and south are single-family residences. All the properties except for the existing Sunshine I iealtll lac! lirk ire designated Single Family Residential and zoned R-3. if the amendment is appro\ cd ant) future development would be subject to the City's transitional provision. 8. The adequacy of and impact on community facilities including utilities, roads, public transportation, parks, recreation, and schools: Raymond Road and loth and I I th Avenues are Local Access streets. 'There are no planned transportation projects in the area. The nearest City recreational facility is Appleway Trail, approximately "7:. mile to the north. The closest formal City park is Balfour Park, approxitnately one mile to the north. A project on the site would he considered infill development. As such, the expansion of allowed uses and increased densities are supported by the infrastructure that is in place. Various Planning Commission members had concerns regarding adequacy of on -street parking in the area and its ability to support future uses allowed in the MFR. 9. The benefit to the neighborhood. Cll. \ . and re.9 ion: This proposed change would allow 1 H l rr,ape r!v to increase density and support infSll development in an area planned for the change will support the identified need for housing. The change benefits thc: 1 jc i, w n I )orhood, City, and region by supporting the following adopted Comprehensive PIa11 Ct i:liS: H-G 1 Allow for a broad range of housing opportunities to meet the needs of the community. H-G2 Enable the deve k ir1rent of of tardable housing for all income levels. 10. The quantity and location of land pi,,1 I1�,1 for the proposed land use type and density aid the demand for such land: Attachment 1 - PI:tnn;u :::; .,.,:,, r: ,;:;4c and Recommendation CPA-2021M001 1' i'_. 2 of 3 This proposal would add approximately one acre of MFR properly. The MFR designation in this (,,cation would allow for increased options for development including an assisted living facility in nu area adjacent to an existing facility. The proposal is limited to a reasonable area and impacts to !,Iiacent Single Family Residential zones would be mitigated by the adopted transitional is ions. 11. The current and projected population density in the area: C III I r,11.. 11, 114 allows for 8 dwelling units per acre• If the proposal is approved, it would allow 1.,1 ;9l} I 1 , tilling unitti I he r acre, a net increase of up to 14 dwelling units. The proposed ,A,0!1,1 have little ilrtp:+ct on overall population density. 1 !Ite<c_Il0. I I:purl other aspect-. of the Comprehensive Plan: 111� \ i l ',upport the goals and policies identified above. The amendment will Is:l\ I;O : I l •I1 t,I.[IC I . lcineiIIs of the Comprehensive Plan. including Housing, Capital :I..'IIIIIc.. ,.IIkI. Erin'IIc: w._r, ii.;cs, Public and Private Utilities, Parks and Open Space and Natural C. Conclusions: The Planning Commission finds compliance with SVMC 17.80.140(H) — Comprehensive Plan Amendment Approval Criteria for CPA-2022-01. The proposed 2021 Comprehensive Plan amendment is consistent with the goals and policies of the Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan, and would promote the public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment. D. Recommendations: The Spokane Valley Planning Commission recommends the City- Council approve 2022 Comprehensive Plan amendment CPA-2022-01. Approved this 24'11day of March. 2022. Robert McKinley, Chainnan ATTEST Marianne Lemons. Planning Commission Secretary :1tt;tLliment t - Planning 11 minissiorr FinJrngs and Recommendation Page 3 ot'3 pA 021-tlol}l ATTACHMENT 2 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE SPOKANE VALLEY PLANNING COMMISSION FOR PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA-2022-02 March 24, 2022 A. Background: 1, The Growth Management Act (GMA) allows local jurisdictions to consider amendments to their Comprehensive Plans once each year. The City codified this process in SVMC 17.80.140. Consistent with state law and the SVMC. staff published notice on August 20 and 27, 2021. advising the public of the annual amendment process. and that the City would accept applications for the 2022 cycle through November 1, 2021. The notice was also sent to all agencies, organizations, and adjacent jurisdictions that may have an interest in seeking amendments to the Comprehensive Pplan. 2. On November 23. 2021, the i itr 1 'tillCi'. ;1i11 -_!i _' { 'Irrlil.:Il, ll,i l'ifkll 1111L'ndnient Docket. The Docket include ! i!i n,;1, .tii ,off .i,-fii14"nl', t. tll t ,,nlplChc-11,1lc Plan: 1111' _• specific map a17lClldille'I1iti :in,: ;11ii..';1; 111 'll9.' I ,:I',l IIIS' and kei'tl111me! ,l'.'l1 I iL ' Facilities map. Site ;ii+pl 0t l't1 i, •C. ;i i . al is_'Ci,1'. I'Ifill :Il1`It'!iJii Iir ISlll require foiltll :, �i,stitifti�.4ilt 11 1LI1i. 1lilill�iit e li�i�tt'lii ltilii the lien 11iii 1 lktit' designation. E3, Findines: 1. These findings are specific to CPA-2022-02. All the findings made in the general Findings and Recommendations are hereby incorporated by reference into these specific findings for CPA-2022- 02 Findings require(I pursuant to ST't1.1C 17.80.140(11)(1): This proposed amendment to change the designation for .45 acres from SFR to PIOS bears a substantial relationship to the public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment. In 2021, the City purchased the parcel from Spokane County for the riper loop trail project and for future access improvements to the Centennial. Trail at Flora Road for the purpose of expanding / increasing access to the City's park lands. This area was generally identified as New Park Area 6 in the 2019 Parks and Recreation Master Plan. These plans were developed through an extensive communil) engagement process. Additionally, the expansion is necessary to maintain the adopted Level of Service (LOS) 3.25 acres of park land for every 1,000 residents. This proposed amendment is consistent ]With the requirements of chapter 36.70A RCW and with the portion of the City's adopted Comprehensive Plan not affected by the amendment. The GMA adopts fourteen goals to guide the de\clopnlent of local comprehensive plans and development regulations. -The proposal is consistent 11 itlt the GMA goals to enhance recreational opportunities and develop parks and recreation facilities. Additionally. the GMA requires a Parks and Recreation element to be a part of the adopted comprehensive plan. The City's Comprehensive Plan adopts the Parks Plan by reference. This proposed amendment will not have unanticipated impacts on other areas of the Comprehensive Plan. 4. This proposed amendment does not respond to a substantial change in conditions beyond the property owner's control applicable to the area within which the subject property lies. 5. This proposed amendment is not in response to or corrects an obvious mapping error. Attachment 2 - Planning Commission Findings and Rcconunendauam CPA•2022-O2 Pagc r of 3 6. This proposed amendment will address a documented def icicncy of park land in the Comprehensive Plan. Findings./orfactors required pursuam to S A1C 17.80.14O(H)(2): 7. The effect upon the physical environment: The change to P/OS will not impact the physical environment. The change will result in less intensive uses than are currently allowed in SFR reducing the potential effects on the physical environment. 8. The effect on open space, streams. rivers, and lakes: According to the C'ity's Critical Area map, the parcel is not impacted by any known critical areas, such as wetlands. fish and wildlife habitat areas, geologically hazardous areas or frequently flooded areas. The parcel is located within shoreline jurisdiction and designated in the Shoreline Master Program as Shoreline Residential Upland. There are no known surface water quality or quantity issues. Chapter 21.40 SVMC and chapter 21.50 SVMC will ensure that adequate protection of the critical areas and adjacent land shorelands are addressed at the time of future development. 9. The compatibility with and impact on adjacent land uses and surrounding neighborhoods: This proposed amendment is compatible with the surrounding land uses. Future development of the park space will remedy a documented need and location identified in the 2019 Parks and Recreation Master Plan. 10. The adequacy of and impact on community facilities including utilities. roads, public transportation, parks, recreation. and schools: Sewer and water are available to the site. The nearest furrnal park is Greenacres Park approximately 1.25 miles to the southeast, the Centennial "Trail is immediately to the north. and across the Spokane River is the newly acquired Flora Park property. The proposal will increase park land and allow future development to access the newly -acquired Flora Park propert) as part of the north river loop trail proposal. The site is served by Flora Road. an Urban Major Collector. The existing and forecast Level of Service (LOS) for Flora Road at this location is A-C. which is within the adopted LOS Montgomery Avenue at this location is a local access street and does not have an adopted LOS. There are no planned capacity or preservation projects planned in this area. 11. The benefit to the neighborhood, City, and region: This proposed amendment will provide benefits to the neighborhood and City by providing an opportunity to provide access to planned improvements on the north side of the Spokane River. 12. The quantity and location of land planned for the proposed land use type and density and the demand for such land: The quantity and location of park land is planned for and needed as identified in the Parks Plan. An access point at this location furthers the goals of the Parks Plan and Comprehensive Plan and would provide easy access for pedestrians and bicycles. 13. The current and projected population density in the area: The proposed change would have minimal impact on projected population density. 14. The effect upon other aspects of the Comprehensive Plan: Attachment 2 - Planning Commission Findings and Recommendation CPA-2022-02 Page 2 of 3 The proposal will not have an impact on other aspects of the Comprehensive Plan. In addition to meeting the goals in the Parks and Recreation Master Plan the proposed amendment addresses the following goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan: LL-G2 Provide for land uses that are essential to Spokane Valley residents, employees, and visitors. LI;-P18 Enable public open spaces. P-G 1 Develop, grow, and maintain a diverse and accessible park, recreation, trail, and open space system that enhances comtnu.nity character. P-P5 Design parks and community facilities to provide easy access for pedestrians, bicycles, autos, and public transit. P-P8 Plan for access to parks, trails, and other open spaces in all neighborhoods. C. Conclusions: The Planning Commission finds compliance with SVMC 17.80.140E ) — Comprehensive Plan Amendment Approv al Criteria for CPA-2022-02. The proposed 2022 Comprehensive Plan amendment is consistent with the t:Q,als and policies of the Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan, and would promote the public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment. D. Recommendations: The Spokane Valley Planning Commission recommends the City Council approve 2022 Comprehensive Plan intendment CPA-2022-02. Approved this 24th day of March, 2022_ Robert McKinley, Chaim an ATTEST Marianne Lemons_ Planning Commission Secretary Attachment 2 - Planning Commission I"indtngs and Recommendation CPA-2022-02 Page .3of3 ATTACHMENT 3 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE SPOKANE VALLEY PLANNING COMMISSION FOR PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT - CPA-2022-03 March 24, 2022 A. Back round: 1. The Growth Management. Act (GMA) allows ii)eal jurisdit ti, lis ti' ,.,insider amendments to their Comprehensive Plans once each year. The C it llifik°+I Ilki'. pio,e,..s in SVI1[..' 17.80.140. Consistent with state law and the SVMC,. stud I+ril.li h :i II,,ii,•L i ii 'Ii,F.ust 71Il and 27, 2021, advising the public of the aSlnu rl :ikneilll'neii li[o. cs, ;.kkk,1 tll:l.t t l i. lt. 11t'I:I ,I :l 't'j t ;k1 1?IkCations for the 201'2 cycle through 'November i. '1i' I . 1 [l. iI 1. 1ti air, organizations. and adjacent jurisdictions that in'i11 11<11 t' ;'+l iI [crest ill +:i'lyCi+_' ;li++eridnierlts to the Comprehensive Plait.. 2. On November 23. 2021, the City Council approved the 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Docket. The Docket includes four proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan: three site specific map amendments and one amendment to Figure 27 — Existing and Recornmended Bike Facilities map. Site specific amendments approved for a Comprehensive Plan amendment will require and receive a zoning classification amendment consistent with the new land use designation. 1?. i°'rrirlinllti: 6e,'._' t'ililiiia are specific to CPA-2022-4i,..\11 111L' Findings made in the general Findings and k'.c,'!,lii;.:Iii]atlolls are hereby. itcor-? .!.:C1i:°d Ili [e1LI .:nee into these specific findings for CPA-2022- 1• indin, , !',ifrsorrrrrl 10 SV, IC 17,,80. I -10i I'll,' 2. I his I'l''p''-:.,i .:ink_;Itllllllll i,, h.ir,i_. ill,' li,',i ii•iti, ii ; r 17.64 acres from SFR to PIGS bears a ,S?11•,I;tl,!i::I iel:!iion-Jul) to tll_' w el[are, and protection of the environment. In ihc i- it\ plii& Ii:i;ed sly. .int'I-. ,.;llll,ti;l i or the iiitersection of44th Avenue and Bates Road for I.',':purpose of t":1,.lndills,' Illti t it i,I11-k land'-.. I kii- area vti is identified as New Park Area 3 in the -.1) 1 it Parks ;LI I..I lye c i jai Ii ll 1 l ,[el 1'I ii i. t,'llii l +'• ;i del: loped through an extensive Community \,IiiiiioI,IllI II1!' t'".l:ll1 i ii kt ,_c.-,ilry to maintain the adopted Level of Scr, 1 + i !`^ ; .'._.` ;1 : •_:, ,'l !':irL land for L'I Ci''• ,l i!i[1 restiitnts. 3. This pi •;l, :'.,I ameit+.inient is c l'1-i.teiit \\ it?1 ilie reynirenlv'nts of 'Hinter 36.70 \ ith the 1:oktii''ii oI the C i[' ' .adopted IontprchensiNr l'I{llt H P :111.0 tcLI 1r", 111(; 111.I,;III, 'rlt (Ilt' atll1)1, ti 11t,'i'li ! {';'ll, k, ,'kliil ihidevelopment of 10,;il :I nil sE'll rl,itr 1+I;tn ;krl,.1 c1ofilienl C L`Ckt:l{ t''ii k IIi`., i,Al.\ yoilk f�' �If1i ii l•.;e Il'Ui.';St '.'i1;CI ,,I,Ib, Ili+ l leg anti ,I,'+clop parks and [�.:i.'.lil�+I'I I;I..'l !tll'•. �,iti lll,!f1,11i1 llhl" 11\1I';irl.•• ;1S)S.I Iii'ci'callllrl e1eniellt [,l ire:I part 01 ilk_ iidopt.,l .,riiflri'llL-n-L1e Hai;. I li%` is. it. i oillpreherl.7,i1e ['Liu tihLl '17C:• the Parks Plan lw [eterei k e. Thl' nooI la e unantucipated Impacts on other areas of the Comprehensive Plan. 4- This 1u',ll)iotieil :.tlltendtllenl Jo,'; not retila,'lid to a snl,tantial change in conditions beyond the property owners control aprli..1ille to i h.' :ire.l t fulfil 1l hich the subject property lies. 5. This proposed amendment is not iii response to or corrects an obvious mapping error. Inachdem ; - f'Iannine i',,mmissinn Findings and Recommendation CPA-2022413 Page I ut 3 6. This proposed amendment will address a documented deficiency of park land in the Comprehensive Plan. l r:,lrrr<<, !uclors ,+rr r, :f rn 4rrrrr+r P„ C'i',k1C 17,80.140(H')(): 1 11,: i ul,..,r,: tlr 1,i;\. •.1.:11 'CON iI;)I1rtW1[t: The chantic I r,'. i. impact the physical environment. The change will result in less intensive ti 11,:1ri ,I: illy allowed in SFR reducing the potential effects on the physical (.••n imnttterli f h�• � i l'...I. , `n ,,,...HI •1�at�':. rl l �•uln•- i i � �,..,_ ;� n�.i l,lr.� �: Accordirl_ l.' 1!lr !. it-y's +. I ii ;,I \ ;: 111,111. the e .tt.. rt I',Ir_ 1 .: re within a Geological Hazardous area identii:,1 ;, t, rrantrr:::11 \IIn+. iCI111. developmclit . [ ti}4 .,Itt' nl,l`• require additional report or studies. 'I 11, re are +I'.' i, •,a n otlr: r i It it :sI oh the site_ as wetlands. fish and wildlife habitat areas. or trequentNN. i' , ;I, .I areas. I he p:locoiti in nor 1,;ated ','within shoreline jurisdiction, and there are no know ii ,Lrrlat':-' eater gtlalrt\ t'I ,!ti {IIV{ „l,t . ('haptcr 2 I ..1-tl ti\ \1C will ensure that adequate protection of the critical areas ark. ;i:lj:+. <ni land rr•: ;lrt :rcicht; t i :li the time of future development. i lie compatibility with and impact on adjacent land uses and surrounding nc: ulI{borhoods: This proposed amendment is compatible with the surrounding land uses. Future development of the park space will provide a documented need and location identified in the 2019) Parks and Recreation Master Plan. 10. The adequacy of and impact on community facilities including utilities roads. public transportation, parks, recreation, and schools: Sewer and water are available to the site. The nearest formal park is Castle Park approximately 2 miles to the north, the Glenrose Unit of Dishman Hills is approximately 1.5 miles to west. The proposal will increase park land and future development will enhance the park system helping maintain the adopted LOS. 11. The benefit to the neighborhood, (itv. and region: This proposed amendment will provide benefits to the neighborhood and City by providing an opportunity to provide park space to the neighborhood. The expansion of park space in this area E Ill help tht' t ii:- Irl [ its adopted LOS for park land. ;\ IMrrnrity or' iht ,lnrrrng Commission had concerns with the potential location of a new fire -„rcet from the existing fire station and the potential impact on the newly acquired . _:. ;Irr;l 1, tlrntLlk�. iill�� lrr:.!1+,+ a,l i,trl,i t �_ t�l .11111 der1.il� wind the kit. 1“111,.l i l ,I.Ich I.;II;I: 1 II4• Cll.l.11ltlt\ Lind i„t',1[1•011 +11 J':n1 1 1[ill lw 1,1:1rI11Ccl k rand needed as identified in the Parks Plan. A lrh;!rirood p,rrl:.il rh+, i, ti:,, tl,rth.'I. lh. ,,,,ais of ill I'.ni, i'lan and Comprehensive Plan. ,lid o1 l:lt'* t;i•l :i it • i' , 11^.'t!--.;11Hn,, I II. ti.411 lll :irk.' l,r, [Lt[L'ti i7,_lL}ll1Sli,+lr 1r,11.,111 lli 1L at -ea: This propt'r5 tl change would have rninirrr:ri impact on projected population density. 14, The effect upon other aspects of the Comprehensive Plan: Attachment 3 - Planning C omn3rr:sinn findings and Recormnendation CPA-2022-03 Page 2 of 3 The proposal will not li;. % meeting the goals in the following goals and policiL 1Yl':C�1 the t.'omprehrrl-,C1 a Plan. In addition to Ls and J- c•c.lc.';il l�'C1 �l,i•,C�'I' Plan the proposed :Hilendment addresses the of the C,•nihrciieii,i', - Han: LU-G2 Provide for land ti:. that are essential to Spokane Valley residents, employees. and visitors. LU-P18 Enable public open spaces. P-G i Develop, grow, and maintain a diverse and accessible park, recreation, trail, and open space system that enhances community character. P-P5 Design parks and community facilities to provide easy access for pedestrians, bicycles, autos, and public transit. P-P8 Plan fur access to parks, trails, and other open spaces in all neighborhoods. C. Conclusions: [he Planning Commission finds compliance with SVMC 17.80.140(H)--Comprehensive Plan Amendment Approval Criteria for CPA-2022-03. The proposed 2022 Comprehensive Plan amendment is consistent with the goals and policies of the Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan, and would promote the public health, safety. welfare, and protection of the environrnent. D. Recommendations: The Spokane Valley Planning Commission recommends the City Council approve 2022 Comprehensive Plan amendment CPA-2022-03. Approved this 24`h day of March, 2022. Robert McKinley, Chairman ATTEST Marianne ernons, Planning Commission Secretary Attachment 3 - Planning Commission Findings and Recommendation CPA-2t122-03 Page 3 of 3 ATTACHMENT 4 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF TIE I SPOKANE VALLEY PLANNING COMMISSION FOR PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA-2022-04 March 24, 2022 A. Background: 1. The Growth Management A,..1 f(r\i.'\l allows Iced_nl jl 1Ititlit ti 'ri io consider ,lnlendnlentS to their Comprehensive Plans once arch \e,Ir. I ft... ( il\ coddled On, \1( i ' ti11.140. Consistent with state law and the tiun .1tiim•,t '1) :Ili.l 2021. advising the public of the annual i 1inciidlncl11 1Jl i'LC ;t11,1 .11:11 die t 4t\ 11 i.lIiI l =1,'C '1" .qil\IiLatL Its For the 2022 cycle through November 1, 2021. III,. rot ICS,: \ ,l ,1,,, •.::Ilt CO.111 organizations. and adjacent j11ti•L1itili+ n 111;1t rn:i\ i1.1\c an intere,i seekil1L ,tmend111elit td the City's Comprehensive Plan, ?_ On November 23, 2021, the City Council approved the 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Docket. The Docket includes four proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan: three site specific map amendments and one amendment to Figure 27 — Existing and Recommended Bike Facilities map. Site specific amendments approved for a Comprehensive Plan amendment \\ i11 require and receive a zoning classification amendment consistent 'Kith the new land use designation. 8. Findings: These findings are specific to CPA-2022-04. All the findings made in the general Findings and Recommendations are hereby incorporated by reference into these specific findings for CPA-2022- 04.. Findings re'q:rir'cc1 pursuant to 1 N 2. This proposed amendment amends 1' Figure 27 identifies planned shared 11 Master Plan, which identified a potent bank of the Spokane River h, •1 w e _•i, 11, Plante's Ferry to the new park. hi property for a new park_ This prol-i.,u• trail into the Comprehensive Plan public health, safety. welfare, and pi Comprehensive Plan is reflective o l� i I.1rL' 27 1 ,rlAing and Recommended Bicycle Facilities. •:e path-.. lit 7019 the City updated the Park and Recreation Palk \ ;l a• for a new community' park on the north ,I. anti 1i:,rkL I as well as a potential trail running from 1. the City aLquire:-I approximately -15 acres of north bank .1 ;iriTcnd,nent forma 1 adopts the proposed north river loop : ntemplated in th1, 1',irk and Recreation Master Plan. The eetion of the L.10. Ir,,nntent are furthered h',,' ensuring the Irrii,ll ;.hnlie\ ,ir,d cur rent ',\ itl, other plans. 3. This proposed amendment is �011.,H1:int with Ile ILclilircn9, the portion of the City's adopted Coln pieliensive Plan rt!'i. ,1I adopts fourteen goals to guide the i.lc'4clopiltint ,}f. regulations. This proposal is consisiL•Ti and develop parks and recreation G. ilitit, �=1,liii4,11,111' ;11 element to be a part of the adopted iiquelleli i\ e plan. I Ile Parks Plan by reference. nt i 11.I1}ter 36.7i1 1 RC.W and \v'ith ieLlcd h.v tilt ,lint ndmel11 I he ((;NIA) ,,1111?Il'Il_Il,I\ ,i1:111-, aild dcv01„1)Illelil ii, :'rlli.11 'L tC !L':il1 .rial opp41rlllllitie . ,\I.\ i.ctri111 ,r 1',ii L And I:e. ication t il\ t t n11 rcliLF1 i\c I'1,rn Adopt!, the T111ti 1}I',1114''Kt41 r1IT1C11(1i110111 \\ 111 I101 11R\ e 1.Ir11i111Cipa.11ed 1I111'a•vt !, 511i4•I .11 35 of the Comprehensive Plan 4. This proposed ainenl,1!licot 1+'.. not l.L',pQit111 ti7 :l ti1111,1ailtiltl L'}1;111pc 1n condltlilil, he.0I111 the property owners control. Attletltnctii 4 - t'ta]initfL, L ,.11i11111.5sir,11 ! !r>•dirlgs and Recommendation L'f A-2022-lW rage I of 3 5. This proposed amendment is not in response to an obvious mapping error. However. with the adoption of the Parks and Recreation Master Plan in 2019 and the property acquisition of the Flora property in 2021, the proposed amendment will add the north river loop trail as discussed in the Park Plan and community` engagement efforts. 6. This proposed amendment will address a du n lcn t :L i of park land in the Comprehensive Plan. Findings fir Factors required pursuant to MC f7.fif)-1-1`a iI;, 2): 7. The effect upon the physical environment: This amendment is not site specific as the physical I�;1i 110It.ii! l,;i not 11;_1i 1+trnt:,il� identified and the change would not result in effects ter ILL; i i:a t ! :1! ,; 1 ,,a „ t. The Is critical areas provisions (chapter 21.40 SVMC) and shoreline li,;,,i •, ir,+ai:ti, (t ii,t! r. r 21.50 ensure that adequate protection of the critical itre.i' alai .,.:trc at the time of future development. There are no krtt;;. ;; uIr1 . .11e; yu;;111 8. The effect on open space, streams, rivers, and lakes: The proposed policies will not have a direct effect on open space, streams, rivers, or lakes. Chapter 21.40 SVMC will ensure that adequate protection of the critical areas and adjacent land use are addressed for any future development. 10. The compatibility with and impact on adjacent land uses and surrounding neighborhoods: This proposed amendment is compatible with the surrounding land uses. Generally, the potential location of the trail is within park designated property. 11. The adequacy of and impact on community facilities including utilities. roads,, public transportation. parks, recreation, and schools: This. is a non -site -specific amendment. While the exact location of the potential trail has not been identified, the availability of '.ewer and writer var . certain lxltential trailheads may have public services. It is expected that the trail, should it be developed, would function in a similar fashion as the Centennial Trail, with some areas remote and lacking services while others are accessible with public services available. 1.2. The benefit to the neiehborliood. City, and region: This proposed amendment will provide benefits to the neighborhood and City by providing an opportunity to provide access to the Spokane River and recreational opportunities along on the north side of the Spokane River_ 13. The quantity and location of land planned for the proposed land use type and density and the demand for such land: The City has not adopted a Level -of -Service (LOS) ratio tar trails; however, the 2019 Park and Recreation Master Plan identifies that the City will take advantage of recreational opportunities as they arise,. and the Comprehensive Plan identifies access to the Spokane River as an opportunity. This location along the north bank of the Spokane River offers a unique chance to take advantage of this opportunity. 14. The current and projected population density in the area: The proposed amendment will not have an impact on current or projected population. 15. The effect union other aspects of the Comprehensive Plan: .Attachment 4 - Planning Commission Finding.: oqui I' ccolSfltic11datio I CPA-20 2-0.1 Pag.e2ri'3 The proposal will not have an impact on other aspects of the Comprehensive Plan. In addition to meeting the goals in the Parks and Recreation Master Plan the proposed amendment addresses the following goals, policies, and strategy of the Comprehensive Plan: LU-G2 Provide for land uses that are essential to Spokane Valley residents, employees, and visitors. LIJ-Pl8 Enable public open spaces. P-G 1 Develop. grow, and maintain a diverse and accessible park, recreation. trail, and open space system that enhances community character. P-P5 Design parks and community facilities to provide easy access for pedestrians, bicycles, autos, and public transit. P-PR Plan for access to parks, trails, and other open spaces in all neighborhoods. Strategy; Evaluate the feasibility of developing a public park along the Spokane River. A. Conclusions: The Planning Commission finds compliance with SVMC 17.80.140(H)— Comprehensive Plan Amendment Approval Criteria for CPA-2022-04. The proposed 2022 Comprehensive Plan amendment is consistent with the goals and policies of the Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan. and would pronttqe site public health, safety. Vo elfare, and protection of the environment. B. Recommendations: The Spokane Valley Planning Commission recommends the City Council approve 202. Comprehensive Plan amendment CPA-2022-0004. Approved this 24'' day of March. 2022. Robert McKinley, Chairman ATTEST Marianne Lemons, Planning Commission Secretary Attachment 4 - Planning Comnttsston Findings and Reoommendatton CPA-2022-04 Page 3of3 Meeting Minutes Spokane Valley Planning Commission Council Chambers — City Hall February 24, 2022 I. Planning Commission Chairman Bob McKinley called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. The meeting was held remotely via ZOOM meeting. II. Administrative Assistant Taylor Dillard took attendance, and the following members and staff were present: Fred Beaulac Susan Delucchi Karl C iranrath Walt I lai . ke. absent Bob Nlckinlcs Nancy :Miller Slitrri Robinson Cary Driskcll, City Attorn.ev Chaz Bates. Planning Manager I;I� lnr 1)iII;3r'�I, A(lillinititr;itive As. .titant Mari:11111C 11.ei11on s. Admililstrati c ,'Assistant III. AGENDA: Commissioner Robinson moved to approve the February 24, 2022 agenda as presented. There was no discussion. The vote on the motion was six in,favor, zero against and the motion passed. IV. MINUTES: Commissioner Delucchi moved to approve the February 10,2022 minutes as presented. There was no discussion. The vote on the motion was six in favor, zero against and the motion passed V. COMMISSION REPORTS: There were no Commission reports. VI. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT: Planning Manager Chaz Bates explained that he will be the administrator of the Planning Commission meetings in the future_ VII. PUBLIC COMMENT: There was no public comment. VIII. COMMISSION BUSINESS: a. 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Planning Manager Chaz Bates gave background and introduced the 2022 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment Process. Mr. Bates explained that amendment applications were accepted through October 31. 2021 and the City Council approved four amendments to be considered during 2022. The Public Hearing for the amendments will be held on March 10, 2022 and notice of the hearing was published twice in the newspaper, was posted on the property site. and was mailed to property owners within 400 feet of the proposed amendment location. u2-24-2022 Planning Cornini,tiiun minute$ PdLC 20l4 CPA-2022-0001: A request to change the comprehensive plan designation and zoning for 1.03 acres from Single -Family Residential (SFR) to Multifamily Residential (MFR). Planning Manager Chaz Bates introduced Comprehcnsi\e Plan Amendment CPA 0001. The property consists of two vacant parcels total 1.03 acres and is located on Raymond Road between 10u, and 1 1th Avenue. The applicant is Land t tic Solutions and the owner of the property is Sunshine Health Facilities (SI IF 1 Pi ij ernes. I.1.0 ). The proposal is to change the Land Use Designation from Single -Family Residential (SFR) to Multifamily Residential (MFR). Mr. Bates reviewed the approval criteria: • Expands the MFR land use area by 1.03 acres • No critical areas within the proposed area. • Supports redevelopment of vacant properties • Supported by transportation network • Compatible with adjacent uses • There is an increasing need for senior and assisted living facilities CPA-2022-0002: A request to change land use designation and zoning for .45 acres from Single -Family Residential (SFR) to Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PINS). Planning Manager Chaz Bates introduced Comprehensive Plan Amendment CPA-2022- 0002. The property consists ofa single parcel totaling .45 acres in size and is located on the northeast comer of N, Flora Road and F. Montgomery Avenue. The property is adjacent to the Flora Road Centennial Trailhcad. The applicant and the owner of the property is the City of Spokane Valley. The proposal is to change the Land LJse Designation from Single -Family Residential (SFR) to Parks, Recreation, and Open Space (P/OS). Mr. Bates reviewed the approval criteria: • Expands the PIOS land use area by .45 acres • No critical areas within the proposed area • The area is identified in the Parks and Recreation Master Plan • The change supports the Centennial Trail access and potential river loop trail. • The change is compatible with surrounding uses CPA-2022-0003: A request to change land use designation and zoning for 17.64 acres from Single -Family Residential (SFR) to Parks, Recreation and Open Space (P/OS). Planning Manager Chaz Bates introduced Comprehensive Plan Amendment CPA-2022- 0003. The property consists of six parcels totaling 17.64 acres. The property is located on the southeast corner of I:. 44tih Avenue and S. Bates Road and extends to the Union Pacific Rai !road. the application and the owner ot'the property is the City of Spokane Valley. The proposal is to change the Lund 1 sc Designation from Single -Family Residential (SFR) to I'ark . Recreation and ()pen Space (P;'.)S). 02-24-2022 Planning Commission Minutes Page 3 of 4 Mr. Bates reviewed the approval criteria: • Expands the P/OS land use area by 17.64 acres • Supports Park Level Of Service • The property was newly acquired for park space • The property provides park space to the neighborhood CPA-2022-0004: A request to amend Figure 27 — Bikeway Network to add north river loop trail. Planning Manager Chaa Bates introduced Comprehensive Plan Amendment CPA-2022- 0004. The proposed amendment is a non -site specific map amendment adding a proposed shared use path to Figure-27 — Map of Existing and Bicycle Facilities of the Comprehensive Plan. The 2019 Parks and Recreation Master Plan identified a potential trail along the north bank of the Spokane River from Plante's Ferry Park to a potential new park between Flora and Barker Rds. In 2021, the City acquired 46 acres in the proposed amendment area. The amendment will adopt a shared use path and will provide a four linear mile trail along the north bank of the Spokane River from Flora Rd to Plante's Ferry. Mr. Bates reviewed the approval criteria: • The area was identified in the 2019 Parks and Recreation. Master Plan • Enhances and supports future park developments • Maintains consistency among plans • Supports grants and other funding opportunities Mr. Bates stated that the Public Hearing for the 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendments will be held on March 10. 2022. IX. GOOD OF THE ORDER: There was consensus from the Planning Commission to mark Commissioner Haneke as "uncxcused due to not iii1ornaltau anyone that he would he: absent from the meeting. Commissioner Robinson stated that slit might have to miss the next meeting due to traveling. X. ADJOURNMENT: Commissioner ,'bugler moved to adjourn the meeting at C. -Il1 /o. in. The vale on the motion was six in favor, zero against, and the motion passed. 3/z77 Bob McKinley, Chair Date Signed 01 24.2022 Planning Commission Minuses I'ag 4 (11'4 Marianne Lemons, Secretary Meeting Minutes Spokane Valley Planning Commission Council Chambers — City Hall March 10, 2022 Planning Commission Chairman Bob McKinley called the meeting to order at 6:01 p.m. The meeting was held remotely via ZOOM meeting_ 1I. P1anni ng Commission Secretary Lemons took attendance. and the following members and staff. were present: Fred Beaulac Susan Delucchi Karl Granrath Walt Haneke Bob McKinley Nancy Miller Sherri Robinson Cary Driskell, City Attorney Chaz Bates, Planning Manager Taylor Dillard. Administrative Assistant Marianne Lemons, Administrative Assistant III. AGENDA: Commissioner Robinson moved to approve the March Ill. 2022 agenda as presented There was no discussion. The vote on the motion was Jive in favor, zero against and the motion passed. IV. MINUTES: Commissioner Beaulac moredto approve the Fehruary 24,2072 minutes as presented. There was no discussion. The vote on the motion '4 was five in favor, zero against and the motion passed. Commissioner Haneke joined the meeting at 6:04 p.m_ V. COMMISSION REPORTS: There were no Commission reports. VI. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT: Planning Manager Chaz Bates stated that City staff is discussing the possibility of holding in -person Planning Commission meetings now that the mask mandates have been rescinded and will give an update when a decision has been made. Ile also stated that a Code Text Amendment \v ill he coming to the Planning Commission for review and recommendation regarding HB 12I () that became effective in 2021 regarding Homeless and Housing. Commissioner Delucchi joined the meeting at (7:()6 p.m. VII. PUBLIC COMMENT: There was no public comment. VIII. COMMISSION BUSINESS: 03-10-2022 Planning Commission Minutes Page 2 of 6 a. Public Hearing: 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendment The public hearing was opened at 6:12 p.m. Planning Manager Chaz Bates gave background and introduced the 2022 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment Process. Mr. Bates explained that amendment applications were accepted through October 31. 2021.and the City Council approved four amendments to be considered during 2022. He stated that the notice of the hearing was published twice in the newspaper, was posted on the property site, and was mailed to property owners within 400 feet of the proposed amendment location. CPA-2022-0001: A request to change the comprehensive plan designation and zoning for 1.03 acres from Single -Family Residential (SFR) to Multifamily Residential (MFR). Planning Manager Char. Bates introduced Comprehensive Plan Amendment CPA-2022- 0001. The property consists of two vacant parcels total 1.03 acres and is located on Raymond Road between 1.0t11 and 1 1 tt' Avenue. The applicant is Land Use Solutions and the owner of the property is Sunshine Health Facilities (SI-iFI Properties, LLC). The proposal is to change the Land Use Designation from Single -Family Residential (SFR) to Multifamily Residential (MFR). Mr. Bates reviewed the approval criteria: • Expands the MFR land use area by 1.03 acres • No critical areas within the proposed area • Supports redevelopment of vacant properties • Supported by transportation network • Compatible with adjacent uses • -There is an increasing need for senior and assisted living facilities CPA-2022-0002: A request to change land ust designation and zoning for .45 acres from Single -Family Residential (SFR) to Park, Recreation and Open Space (PIOS). Planning Manager Chaz Bates introduce,' (. omprebcri,evc Plan Amendment CPA-2022- 0002. The property consists ofa single paieel totaling .45 acres in size and is located on the northeast corner of N. Flora Road and F. \ lc}ntguii 'cry Avenue. The property is adjacent to the Flora Road Centennial Trailhead. The appl ek,hf,i and the owner of the property is the City of Spokane Valley. The proposal is and Use Designation from Single -Family Residential (SFR) to Parks, RecreatioH. And r. )pel[ Space (P/OS). Mr. Bates reviewed the approval criteria: • Expands the PIGS land use area by .45 acres • 4o critical areas within the proposed area • The area is identified in the Parks uiid recreation Master Plan • The change supports the Centennial l rail access and potential river loop trail. • The change is compatible with surroundiii . uses 03-10-2022 Planning Commission Minutes Page3 of6 CPA-2022-0003: A request to change land use designation and zoning for 17.64 acres from Single -Family Residential (SFR) to Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PIGS). Planning Manager Chaz Bates itll6 t! t�s. cd i't ynai�r� l :t l ,i r Plan :lrnendment CPA-2022- 0003, The property consists of six preeI: 7.64 acres. The property is located on the southeast corner of E. 44`11 .\RAI:id and extends to the Union Pacific Railroad. The application and the ownL'r r c [ I-1(.. properly is the City of Spokane Valley. The proposal is to change the Land Use De:•.iL i-iation from Single -Family Residential (SFR) to Parks, Recreation and Open Space (P/US). Mr. Bates reviewed the approval criteria: • Expands the P/OS land use area by 17.64 acres • Supports Park Level Of Service • The property was newly acquired for park space • The property provides park space to the neighborhood CPA-2022-0004: A request to amend Figure 27 — Bikeway Network to add north ri■ cr loop trail. Planning Manager Chary. Bates introduced Comprehensive Plan Amendment CPA-2022- 0004. The proposed amendment is a non -site specific map amendment adding a proposed shared use path to Figure-27 — Map of Existing and Bicycle Facilities of the Comprehensive Plan. The 2019 Parks and Recreation. Master Plan identified a potential trail along the north bank of the Spokane River from Plante's Ferry Park to a potential new park between Flora and Barker Rds. In 2021, the City acquired 46 acres in the proposed amendment area. The amendment will adopt a shared use path and will provide a four linear mile trail along the north bank of the Spokane River from Flora Rd to Plante's Ferry,. Mr. Bates reviewed the approval criteria: • The area was identified in the 2019 Parks and Recreation Master Plan • Enhances and supports future park developments • Maintains consistency among plans • Supports grants and sthcr 1 AltIL.111g t74347t]r11k11tl CS The matter was opened for public comment. Dwight Hume, the applicant representing Sunshine Health regarding CPA-2022-0001 stated that he reviewed the staff report and agreed with everything included in the report. He said that he feels their proposal is consistent with the criteria for approval within the Comprehensive Plan. 1-le stated that he feels Spokane Valley has a need for assititecl lip iTir facilities and Sunshine Health hopes to get the multi -family designation so that they can help fill that need. He also said that the surrounding neighborhood is in favor of request. Nathan Dikes, CEO for Sunshine Health Facilities stated that Sunshine has been in Spokane Valley since 1965. He concurred with Mr. i ittnmc"s testimony and the staff presentation. He said that Sunshine Health wants to be a Loud nei!,hbor to the surrounding area and thinks that 03-10-2022 Planning Commission Minutes Page 4 of 6 the proposed development will be a good addition once the land use change has been made to the property. Planning Commissioner Miller asked what services are already available in the current location. Mr. Dikes answered that they provide a skilled nursing facility, assisted living, behavioral health unit, a memory care unit. a certified home health unit, and four adult family homes. Planning Commissioner Secretary read comments received from three members of the public: Wendy Johnson, President of the Chester Community Cemetery expressed support for CPA-2022-0003 stating that the change to Parks and Open Space would be an improvement to the area and would be appreciated by the residents that live nearby. Jene Ray, Spokane Valley, stated that she would like for the area referenced in CPA- 2022-0003 to remain a dog walkers park with the addition of disc golf. Don Danner, Spokane Valley, expressed opposition to CPA-2022-0001 stating that the area around Sunshine Health is already overburdened by firetrucks, ambulances, and police cars blocking the road. He does not feel that the area is designed to support such a large facility and should remain zoned single-family residential. The Planning Commissioners allowed Ms. Jene Ray to speak publicly regarding her written comments. Jene Ray. Spokane Valley. reiterated that she enjoys having the park in her backyard and requested that the City add disc golf to the park once it is developed. She also gave options for getting funding for the disc golf. City Attorney Cary Driskell explained that the current request is just for the land use designation of the property, but the Parks Department will do a public master plan for the development of the park if the land use designation is granted. The public hearing was closed at 6:52 p.m. The Commissioners decided to discuss each Comprehensive Plan Amendment individually. CPA-2022-000I: Commissioner Miller stated that there are 24 assisted living communities and 18 assisted living adult family honks within the City of Spokane Valley. She expressed that she doesn't want to see the R- 3 zone be absorbed by multi -family zoning. She said that she feels that the street is very narrow and parking is an issue in that area. Commissioner Haneke stated that he agrees that the street is too narrow. He would like to recommend that parking being banned on the east side of the street. Commissioner Robinson said that Spokane is a medical hub for the surrounding area and a big portion of the: people moving to the arca are retirees which means there is a large population of people who need the services that assisted living can provide. She also mentioned that people moving into assisted living don't usually drive so she doesn't feel that the parking from the facility residents is going to have a significant impact on the street. Commissioner Delucchi asked how many units would be allowed under the current zoning. Mr. Bates answered that eight units would be allowed under the current zoning and 22 units would be allowed if multi -family zoning is granted. 03..111-2022 I'I.Innim_ Commission sion Minutes Page 5 of 6 Commissioner Granrath said that while he is not usually in favor of changed residential to multi -family, he feels that Sunshine Health should be allowed to develop their property and that there is a need for additional assisted living facilities. Chairman McKinley stated that he also sees a need for assisted living facilities and Sunshine Health has been a good neighbor in Spokane Valley. However, there is a risk that the properly could be soli after the zone change and sornethimt, totally different could be built on the property instead. The Planning Commission came to a cousen4;ris that fiv c nitmhtrs were in favor of recommending approval of the amendrl re r it : lid t t\ t , , 1,,, ,� tl . t ,' m m i ti i t ne[' Haneke asked if language could be added regardintt rt lri.'It1. oil ,freer ;};.rl,irl". ` 1r. 1 i:ltcs stated that he could add that recommendation to the I !i dirt of l :ict presentLt1 to t[1 Cc it\ t 0LIriCiI. With the recommendation language 1,1.1 .l. i ,.,r l!rl1�sio11�r l laneke agreed to reulnuncn6 approval which made the consensus six iu la\ or and pane opposed. CPA- 20 22-0002 Commissioner Haneke expressed concern that there is no parking available in the area for the proposed trailhead. City Attorney Driskell responded that the proposed use of the property is to provide connectivity from the north bank to the Flora park land. 1-le explained that it is not intended to be a parking area. The Planning Commission came to consensus that all members were in favor of recommending approval of the land use change. A ten-minute break was called at 7:25 p.m. The meeting was called back to order at 7:35 p.m. CPA- 2027-00(}3 Commissioner Beaulac asked how much park land would be allocated to the fire department for a new fire station. He expressed concern about building a new fire station across the street from the old fire station. Ile dot'sn't Co:1 this is a good use of taxpayer money. City Attorney Driskell responded that the intcrlocal a:rcement reads that Spokane Fire District #8 would purchase an estimated three deft s Or the acquired land. They hope to replace the outdated station with a more modern station that would also have some minor components that would allow for on -site training. Commissioner Haneke asked why it would be zoned parks and open space when it's going to be purchased by the Fire Department. Mr. Bates responded that community services, such as a lire station, is an allowed use within the Parks and Open Space zoning district. The Planning Commission came to consensus that six members were in favor of recommending approval of the land use change and one opposed. CPA-2022-0004 There was no discussion. The Planning Commission came to consensus that all members were in favor of recommending approval of the amendment. Commissioner Haneke moved to recommend approval ofCP. i-2022-0001 with urldet1 language. CP.1-2(J22-Hi) 2 as submitted. CP:l-_''(a 1 /in t(i)ift'[r° ,..om rents rc :, rr�li,it the firir ant a 1'.1-2022-0004 as suhmitted. l 1icic discussion. The lit,on the moiwn i, ci t�`'4",_'!i L'r favor. zero against and the motion /` 0..s. d. 03-10-2022 Planning Commission Minutes Page 6 of 6 X. GOOD OF THE ORDER: There was nothing offered for the Good Of The Order. ADJOURNMENT: Commissioner McKinley moved to adjourn the meeting al 8: f)4 p.m. The vote on the motion' as seven in favor, zero against, and the motion passed. Bob McKinley, Chair Date Signed Marianne Lemons, Secretary Meeting Minutes Spokane Valley Planning Commission Council Chambers — City Hall March 24, 2022 I. Planning Commission Chairman Bob McKinley called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. The meeting was held remotely via ZOOM meeting. II. Planning Commission Secretary Lemons took attendance, and the following members and staff were present: Fred Beaulac Susan Delucchi Karl Granrath Walt Haneke Bob McKinley Nancy Miller, absent Sherri Robinson Cary Driskell, City Attorney Chaz Bates, Planning Manager Marianne Lemons, Administrative Assistant There was consensus from the Planning Commission to excuse Commissioner Miller from the meeting. III. AGENDA: Commissioner Robinson moved to approve the March 24, 2022 agenda as presented. There was no discussion. The vote on the motion was five in favor, zero against and the motion passed. IV. MINUTES: Commissioner Beaulac moved to approve the AMENDED March 10, 2022 minutes as submitted. There was no discussion. The vote on the motion was five in favor, zero against and the motion passed. V. COMMISSION REPORTS: There were no Commission reports. Commissioner Granrath joined the meeting at 6:04 p.m. VI. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT: Planning Manager Chaz Bates stated that meetings will return to in -person at the next Planning Commission meeting to be held on April 14, 2022. VII. PUBLIC COMMENT: There was no public comment. VIII. COMMISSION BUSINESS: a. Findings Of Fact: 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Planning Manager Chaz Bates presented the Findings of Fact for the 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendments for approval. He stated that the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendments on at the March 10, 2022 03-24-2022 Planning Commission Minutes Page 2 of 2 meeting. After receiving public testimony, the Planning Commission moved and voted 7-0 to recommend approval to the City Council of CPA-2022-0001 with added parking language, CPA-2022-0002 as submitted, CPA-2022-0003 with added comments regarding the fire station and CPA-2022-0004 as submitted. He explained that the approval of the Findings of Fact will formalize the recommendations that were made at the public hearing. Commissioner Robinson moved to approve the Findings of Fact for the approval of CPA- 2022-0001, CPA-2022-0002, CPA-2022-0003, CPA-2022-0004 as submitted. There was no discussion. The vote on the motion was six in favor, zero against and the motion passed. IX. GOOD OF THE ORDER: Commissioner Beaulac asked if it would be possible to change the newspaper of record from the Spokane Valley Herald to the Spokesman Review. Attorney Driskell explained that the City Council adopted the Herald as the newspaper of record and has not opted to change it. X. ADJOURNMENT: Commissioner Granrath moved to adjourn the meeting at 6:13 p. )n. The vote on the motion was seven in favor, zero against, and the motion passed. Bob McKinley, Chair Date Signed Marianne Lemons, Secretary CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Planning Commission Action Meeting Date: February 24, 2022 Item: Check all that apply n old business ❑ new business n public hearing n information ® study session n pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: 2022 Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendments — Study session GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 36.70A, SVMC 17.80.140 and 19.30.010. PREVIOUS COMMISSION ACTION: None BACKGROUND: The GMA allows local jurisdictions to consider amendments to their Comprehensive Plans once each year. The City codified this process in Section 17.80.140 of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC). Consistent with state law and the SVMC, staff published notice on August 20 and 27, 2021, advising the public of the annual amendment process and that the City would accept applications for the 2022 cycle through November 1, 2021. The notice was also sent to all agencies, organizations, and adjacent jurisdictions that may have an interest in amending the comprehensive plan. On November 23, 2021, the City Council approved the 2022 Docket. The Docket includes four proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan: three site specific map amendments and an amendment to Figure 27 adding a proposed shared use path. On January 14, 2022, the City issued Determinations of Non -significance (DNS) for the proposed comprehensive plan amendments pursuant to Title 21, Environmental Controls of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code. Comments on the determination have been incorporated into the staff reports where appropriate and no appeal of the DNS was received. A public hearing on the proposed amendments is scheduled for March 10, 2022. The Notice of Public Hearing was published on February 11 and 18, 2022. The site -specific map amendments were posted on site and a notice was mailed to residents within a 400-foot radius on February 18, 2022. Tonight, staff will present the proposed comprehensive plan amendments for review and discussion. On March 10, 2022, the Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on the proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: No action recommended at this time. STAFF CONTACT: Chaz Bates, AICP, Planning Manager ATTACHMENTS: 1. Presentation 2. Yellow Binder RPCA Study Session for 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Page 1 of 1 2022 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendments February 24, 2024 Chaz Bates, Planning Manger Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment Process Initiated by: Property owners/representatives Citizens, agencies, neighborhood City Application deadline November 1 Notice published 60-days prior Notice sent to agencies, organizations, and adjacent jurisdictions Pre-app required Complete application(s) are docketed '.#\`�, COMMUNITY AND PUBLIC WORKS . MiI ley DEPARTMENT NOTICE OF CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY'S ANNUAL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CYCLE The City of Spokane Valley is providing notice that the application window for the 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendment cycle will close on November 1, 2021. Completed applications must be received by 5:00 p,m. on November 1, 2021 to be considered during the 2022 amendment cycle. Applications received after November 1, 2021, will be registered for consideration for the next amendment cyde in 2023. All proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan require a pre -application conference prior to submitting an application. The City of Spokane Valley's Comprehensive Plan is the primary policy document that governs how the City will accommodate and respond to the growth of the community over time. The annual amendment cycle provides the opportunity to propose changes in the Comprehensive Plan to address changing land use conditions or emerging issues. Proposed amendments will be subject to review and a public hearing by the Spokane Valley Planning Commission before recommendations are made to the City Council. For more information about the comprehensive plan or application materials please visit www.spokanevalley.orgicp or contact Chaz Bates, Senior Planner at (509) 720-5337 or cbates@spokanevalley.orp. 2/24/2022 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Study Session 2 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Roles Staff • Facilitates Process • Conducts review and analysis • Prepares staff reports and public notices 2/24/2022 Planning Commission • Conducts Public Hearing • Deliberates and recommendation to Council 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Study Session City Council • Reviews PC Findings and Deliberations • Considers public comment • May approve, modify, or deny requests 3 2022 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment Timeline Today Approve Docket 0 U SEPA Determ 0 Study Session ' E C 2-24-2022 o Public Hearing 0 3-10-2022 ▪ c Findings of Fact CD 3-24-2022 2/24/2022 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Study Session Administrative Report 4-19-2022 1st Reading .(") 5-3-2022 0 0 2nd Reading 5-24-2022 U Notice of Public Hearing Published in paper 2-11-2022 & 2-18-2022 Posted on property 2-22-2022 Mailed to property owners 2-18-2022 �`. Maxwell Ave E Shar Legend - Project Site 400 foot buffer E Uesmet Ave E"DesmefAve 2/24/2022 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Study Session L Planning Commission Materials Yellow Binder Staff Report Application materials Maps SEPA Checklist Notices Agency comments Public comments Supplemental documents 2/24/2022 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Study Session a�'�t • mar, iy .mac —■r, .:.:■ :r 1, ,16�1 City of Spokane Valley Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendments Spokan . Valley. 10210 E. Sprague Avenue Spokane Valley, WA 99206 wwwSpokane9'aNey.org 6 Approval Criteria - SVMC 17.80.140 Required Findings Supports public health, safety, and protection of the environment Consistent with GMA and Comp Plan Responds to change in conditions Corrects an error Addresses deficiency Additional Factors Effect on environment Effect on open space, streams, rivers, and lakes Compatibility and impact on existing uses and neighborhoods Adequacy and impact on services Benefit to City and Region Quantity, location and demand for land Projected population for area Other effects on Comp Plan 2/24/2022 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Study Session 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Docket File Number Location Type / Who Description CPA-2022-01 CPA-2022-02 CPA-2022-03 CPA-2022-04 10506 E 10th 17105 E Montgomery 44th and Bates Bike and Pedestrian Map Figure 27 Map / Private Change 1.03 acres from SFR to MFR Map / City Change .45 acres from SFR to P/OS Map / City Change 17.64 acres from SFR to P/OS Map / City Add proposed north river loop trail to Figure 27. 2/24/2022 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Study Session Privately Initiated Map Amendment CPA-2022-01 Applicant: Land Use Solutions Owner: Sunshine Health Facilities Amendment: Change from Single Family Residential (SFR) to Multiple Family Residential (MFR) cr SBalfour Rd E 9th Ave SRayrnond Rd Application Area E 11th Ave hAve 5 Oberlin Rd E 13th Ave E 9th Av E 10th Av fIttED E1Zth Ay Legend c1IU MFR PAS MU RC _ IMU NC SFR AO 50 1W 200 5OO .9 2/24/2022 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Study Session 9 CPA-2022-01 -Application Analysis Expands the MFR by 1.03 ac No critical areas Supports redevelopment of vacant properties Supported by transportation network Compatible with adjacent uses Increasing need for seniors and assisted living facilities 2/24/2022 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Study Session City Initiated Map Amendment CPA-2020-0002 Applicant: Spokane Valley Owner: Spokane Valley Amendment: Change from Single Family Residential (SFR) to Parks, Recreation and Open Space (P/OS) 2/24/2022 4lan fielli A v� F Knnv d.m Legend CM U - MFR - POS Offil MU - RC IMU NC SFR A 0 50 100 200 900 400 Feet 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Study Session 11 CPA-2022-02 -Application Analysis Expands the P/OS by .45 ac No critical areas Area identified in Park and Recreation Master Plan Supports Centennial Trail access and potential river loop trail Compatible with surrounding uses 2/24/2022 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Study Session 12 CPA-2020-03 - City Initiated Map Amendment Applicant: Spokane Valley Owner: Spokane Valley Amendment: Change from Single Family Residential (SFR) to Parks, Recreation and Open Space (P/OS) 46th A �E 47fh E44thAve E 47th Ave 1 1 1 1 I Application Area a cg E Thorpe Rd Legend ▪ CMu-MFR-POS. MU - RC ▪ IMU - NC SFR 0 50 003 200 SOO 40 Feet 2/24/2022 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Study Session 13 CPA-2023-03 -Application Analysis Expands the P/OS by 17.64 ac Supports Park Level of Service Newly acquired property for parks Provides park space to the neighborhood 2/24/2022 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Study Session 14 CPA-2020-04 - City Initiated Map Amendment Applicant: Spokane Valley Owner: Spokane Valley Amendment: Amend Figure 27 - Existing and Recommended Bicycle Facilities 2/24/2022 SpolraaeVallay o g 509. 720.5000 Spokane Valley River Loop Trail FUNDING REQUEST.. S16.5 million The Spokane Valley River Loop Trail, a paved non -motorized trail along the Spokane River's north bank that would connect Plartte's Ferry Sports Complex to two city regional parks- The proposed trail is approximately five miles long and a recommended project in the city's 2019 Parks and Recreation Master Plan- The trail would connect to the Centennial Trail with two pedestrian bridges and improve acr to the Spokane River - Flames Ferry ns Confgex PINES ROAD ACCESS A new access and parking area for users of both the Centennial and Spokane Valley River Loop hails. A pedeshian bridge span- ning the Spokane River would connect the two trails. SPOKANE VALLEY RIVER LOOP TRAIL A five -mile (non-motar¢ed) paved scenic bad that would serve bicy- clists, runners and walkers, and allow access to the rover's north side for fishermen and whitewater enthusiasts. PEDESTRIAN BRIDGES Line Added FLORA ROAD PARK PROPERTY A46-acre property envisioned to hew:le nature trails and other park facilities along the river's northern hank. A pedestnan bridge spanning the river would cmrnect the River Loop Trail and park to Fiore Road and the Centennial Trail. Rora Road Falk Propeey 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Study Session 15 CPA-2022-04 -Application Analysis Identified in 2019 Park and Recreation Master Plan Enhances and supports future park developments Maintains consistency among plans Supports grants and other funding opportunities 2/24/2022 SplCIIIV SWAnAge Ares Conser) Area IW Creak Mik Aye Plan F 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Study Session skwanecaanrr Natural Area uber y L' A Figure 27 Map of Exisiting and sPoiene eennrr Recommended Bicyle Facilities Proposed Amendment r��scviti Proposed Shared Use Path Existing & Proposed Bikeway Network Municipal Boundaries 0-polane'✓alley (�1 Spokane Valley Urban G opth Area UG.P Parks. Recreation. LP OW Eons, Bikeway Elements - Existing Tr,. Lane - E+clino tai rd SW. Palm - Pare Frierd y Rcrr_e Dist, ned/Plkc E rd„c ----Proposed Pike Lane per Praponed Pedi Blke Bridge Proposed Stared _sr Pat- 0 0.s i 1.L50 16 Discussion SCI6 ane p Valley 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Study Session 17 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Planning Commission Action Meeting Date: March 10, 2022 Item: Check all that apply n old business n new business ® public hearing n information n study session ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: 2022 Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendments — Public Hearing. GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 36.70A, SVMC 17.80.140 and 19.30.010. PREVIOUS COMMISSION ACTION: On February 24, 2022, the Planning Commission held a Study Session on the 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendments. BACKGROUND: The GMA allows local jurisdictions to consider amendments to their Comprehensive Plans once each year. The City codified this process in SVMC 17.80.140. Consistent with state law and City Code, staff published notice on August 20 and 27, 2021, advising the public of the annual amendment process and that the City would accept applications for the 2022 cycle through November 1, 2021. The notice was also sent to all agencies, organizations, and adjacent jurisdictions that may have an interest in amending the Comprehensive Plan. On November 23, 2021, the City Council approved the 2022 Docket. The Docket includes four proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan: three site specific map amendments and an amendment to Figure 27 adding a proposed shared use path. On January 14, 2022, the City issued Determinations of Non -significance (DNS) for the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendments pursuant to Title 21, Environmental Controls of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code. Comments on the determination have been incorporated into the staff reports where appropriate and no appeal of the DNS was received. On February 11 and 18, 2022, a Notice of Public Hearing for the proposed amendments was published. On February 17, 2022, the site -specific map amendments were posted on the sites and a notice of public hearing was mailed to property owners within 400 feet of the proposed amendment sites. On February 24, 2022, staff presented the proposed 2022 Comprehensive Plan amendments to the Planning Commission for their review and discussion. Tonight's meeting will include a public hearing on the proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Discuss the proposed amendments and provide staff direction to prepare the findings. The Planning Commission may recommend approval, approval with modifications, or denial of the proposed amendments. STAFF CONTACT: Chaz Bates, AICP, Planning Manager ATTACHMENTS: 1. Presentation 2. Please bring Yellow Binder RPCA Public Hearing for 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Page 1 of 1 2022 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendments March 10, 2022 Chaz Bates, Planning Manger Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment Process Initiated by: Property owners/representatives Citizens, agencies, neighborhood City Application deadline November 1 Notice published 60-days prior Notice sent to agencies, organizations, and adjacent jurisdictions Pre-app required Complete application(s) are docketed '.#\`�, COMMUNITY AND PUBLIC WORKS . MiI ley DEPARTMENT NOTICE OF CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY'S ANNUAL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CYCLE The City of Spokane Valley is providing notice that the application window for the 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendment cycle will close on November 1, 2021. Completed applications must be received by 5:00 p,m. on November 1, 2021 to be considered during the 2022 amendment cycle. Applications received after November 1, 2021, will be registered for consideration for the next amendment cyde in 2023. All proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan require a pre -application conference prior to submitting an application. The City of Spokane Valley's Comprehensive Plan is the primary policy document that governs how the City will accommodate and respond to the growth of the community over time. The annual amendment cycle provides the opportunity to propose changes in the Comprehensive Plan to address changing land use conditions or emerging issues. Proposed amendments will be subject to review and a public hearing by the Spokane Valley Planning Commission before recommendations are made to the City Council. For more information about the comprehensive plan or application materials please visit www.spokanevalley.orgicp or contact Chaz Bates, Senior Planner at (509) 720-5337 or cbates@spokanevalley.orp. 3/10/2022 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Public Hearing 2 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Roles Staff • Facilitates Process • Conducts review and analysis • Prepares staff reports and public notices 3/10/2022 Planning Commission • Conducts Public Hearing • Deliberates and recommendation to Council 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Public Hearing City Council • Reviews PC Findings and Deliberations • Considers public comment • May approve, modify, or deny requests 3 2022 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment Timeline Today 40.0 a) a) 2 O v a Approve Docket 0 U SEPA Determ to c � i ca o a .u) 2 u) ▪ v .E In E = o /Public Hearin C 3-10-202J O to c N . V c Findings of Fact O CD 3-24-2022 Z 0- Study Session 2-24-2022 3/10/2022 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Public Hearing Administrative Report 4-19-2022 1 st Reading . (") 5-3-2022 0 0 2nd Reading 5-24-2022 U Notice of Public Hearing Published in paper 2-11-2022 & 2-18-2022 Posted on property 2-22-2022 Mailed to property owners 2-18-2022 �`. Maxwell Ave E Shha Jr EIS te'' Pep irorl'ar ■ Legend - Project Site 400 foot buffer I I 1 E esme ve 1 E"DesmefAve �I I 3/10/2022 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Public Hearing Planning Commission Materials Yellow Binder Staff Report Application materials Maps SEPA Checklist Notices Agency comments Public comments Supplemental documents 3/10/2022 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Public Hearing a�'�t • iy .mac ;—■r' .:.:■ :r 1, ,111 City of Spokane Valley Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendments Spokan 1 Valley. 10210 E. Sprague Avenue Spokane Valley, WA 99206 wwwSpokane9'aNey.org 6 Approval Criteria - SVMC 17.80.140 Required Findings Supports public health, safety, and protection of the environment Consistent with GMA and Comp Plan Responds to change in conditions Corrects an error Addresses deficiency Additional Factors Effect on environment Effect on open space, streams, rivers, and lakes Compatibility and impact on existing uses and neighborhoods Adequacy and impact on services Benefit to City and Region Quantity, location and demand for land Projected population for area Other effects on Comp Plan 3/10/2022 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Public Hearing 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Docket File Number Location Type / Who Description CPA-2022-01 CPA-2022-02 CPA-2022-03 CPA-2022-04 10506 E 10th 17105 E Montgomery 44th and Bates Bike and Pedestrian Map Figure 27 Map / Private Change 1.03 acres from SFR to MFR Map / City Change .45 acres from SFR to P/OS Map / City Change 17.64 acres from SFR to P/OS Map / City Add proposed north river loop trail to Figure 27. 3/10/2022 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Public Hearing Privately Initiated Map Amendment CPA-2022-01 Applicant: Land Use Solutions Owner: Sunshine Health Facilities Amendment: Change from Single Family Residential (SFR) to Multiple Family Residential (MFR) cr SBalfour Rd E 9th Ave SRayrnond Rd Application Area E 11th Ave hAve 5 Oberlin Rd E 13th Ave E9tAv E lOth Av. fIdED E12th Ay Legend cm MFR PAS MU RC _ IMU NC SFR AO 50 1W 200 5OO .9 3/10/2022 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Public Hearing 9 CPA-2022-01 -Application Analysis Expands the MFR by 1.03 ac No critical areas Supports redevelopment of vacant properties Supported by transportation network Compatible with adjacent uses Increasing need for seniors and assisted living facilities 3/10/2022 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Public Hearing CPA-2022-01: Staff, Agency, Public Comment Staff and Agency Comment Public Comment No comments received. No comments received 3/10/2022 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Public Hearing 11 City Initiated Map Amendment CPA-2022-02 Applicant: Spokane Valley Owner: Spokane Valley Amendment: Change from Single Family Residential (SFR) to Parks, Recreation and Open Space (P/OS) 4lan fielli A v� F Knnv d.m Legend CM U - MFR - POS I MU - RC IMU NC SFR A 0 50 100 MO 900 400 Feet 3/10/2022 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Public Hearing 12 CPA-2022-02 -Application Analysis Expands the P/OS by .45 ac No critical areas Area identified in Park and Recreation Master Plan Supports Centennial Trail access and potential river loop trail Compatible with surrounding uses 3/10/2022 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Public Hearing 13 CPA-2022-02: Staff, Agency, Public Comment Staff and Agency Comment Public Comment No comments received. No comments received 3/10/2022 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Public Hearing 14 CPA-2022-03 - City Initiated Map Amendment Applicant: Spokane Valley Owner: Spokane Valley Amendment: Change from Single Family Residential (SFR) to Parks, Recreation and Open Space (P/OS) 46th A �E 47fh E44thAve E 47th Ave 1 1 1 1 I Application Area a cg E Thorpe Rd Legend ▪ CMu-MFR-POS. MU - RC ▪ IMU - NC SFR 0 50 003 200 SOO 40 Feet 3/10/2022 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Public Hearing 15 CPA-2022-03 -Application Analysis Expands the P/OS by 17.64 ac Supports Park Level of Service Newly acquired property for parks Provides park space to the neighborhood 3/10/2022 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Public Hearing 16 CPA-2022-03: Staff, Agency, Public Comment Staff and Agency Comment Public Comment No comments received. No comments received 3/10/2022 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Public Hearing 17 CPA-2022-04 - City Initiated Map Amendment Applicant: Spokane Valley Owner: Spokane Valley Amendment: Amend Figure 27 - Existing and Recommended Bicycle Facilities SpolraaeValtey o g 509. 720.5000 Spokane Valley River Loop Trail FUNDING REQUEST.. S16.5 million The Spokane Valley River Loop Trail, a paved non -motorized trail along the Spokane River's north bank that would connect Plartte's Ferry Sports Complex to two city regional parks- The proposed trail is approximately five miles long and a recommended project in the city's 2019 Parks and Recreation Master Plan- The trail would connect to the Centennial Trail with two pedestrian bridges and improve acr to the Spokane River - Flames Ferry ns Confgex PINES ROAD ACCESS A new access and parking area for users of both the Centennial and Spokane Valley River Loop hails. A pedeshian bridge span- ning the Spokane River would connect the two trails. SPOKANE VALLEY RIVER LOOP TRAIL A five -mile (non-motar¢ed) paved scenic bad that would serve bicy- clists, runners and walkers, and allow access to the rover's north side torhshemren and whitewater enthusiasts. PEDESTRIAN BRIDGES Line Added FLORA ROAD PARK PROPERTY A46-acre property envisioned to hew:le nature trails and other park facilities along the river's northern hank. A pedestnan bridge spanning the river would connect the River Loop Trail and park to Flora Road and Ole Centennial Trail. Rona Road Falk Propeey 3/10/2022 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Public Hearing 18 CPA-2022-04 -Application Analysis Identified in 2019 Park and Recreation Master Plan Enhances and supports future park developments Maintains consistency among plans Supports grants and other funding opportunities SWItale Felts Field Conserel ntArea Illor Creak Conservation Area E A4,1,,e Plan F 3/10/2022 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Public Hearing spokan.cmanlr Natiffal Area A Figure 27 Map of Exisiting and sPoiene een�rr Recommended Bicyle Facilities EuelitlAve uber y L' Proposed Amendment r��scviti Proposed Shared Use Path Existing & Proposed Bikeway Network Municipal Boundaries 0-polane'✓alley (�1 Spokane Valley Urban GmvM Area UG.P Parks. Recreation. LP OP, Spe, Bikeway Elements — Existing Tr,. Lane - E+iclino rued UAPalm — Pare Frier, ar Rcrr_e Glf[In 'ed/Pitt Erd„c ----Proposed Pike Lane �.M Praponed Pedi Blke Bridge Proposed Stared _sr Fatl- 0 0.5 i t.,1 0 19 CPA-2022-04: Staff, Agency, Public Comment Staff and Agency Comment Public Comment No comments received. No comments received 3/10/2022 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Public Hearing 20 Questions? SCI6 ane p Valley 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Public Hearing 21 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Planning Commission Action Meeting Date: March 24, 2021 Item: Check all that apply n old business Fl new business ❑ public hearing n information n study session ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: 2022 Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendments — Findings of Fact GOVERNING LEGISLATION: Chapter RCW 36.70A, SVMC 17.80.140 and 19.30.010. PREVIOUS COMMISSION ACTION: Study Session on February 24, 2022; Public Hearing on March 10, 2022. BACKGROUND: On February 24, 2022, the Planning Commission held a study session on the proposed 2022 Comprehensive Plan amendments. A public hearing on the proposed amendments was held March 10, 2022. Following the public hearing, the Planning Commission deliberated on each CPA and voted as follows: CPA-2022-01 6-1 to forward to City Council a recommendation to approve CPA-2022-01. CPA-2022-02 7-0 to forward to City Council a recommendation to approve CPA-2022-02. CPA-2022-03 6-1 to forward to City Council a recommendation to approve CPA-2022-03. CPA-2022-04 7-0 to forward to City Council a recommendation to approve CPA-2022-04. City Council may choose to adopt the proposed individual amendments as recommended by the Planning Commission, deny the proposed amendments, or modify and adopt the proposal. If the Council chooses to modify a proposal and the modifications are substantial, they must either conduct a public hearing or refer the proposal back to the Planning Commission for further consideration. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: I move to approve and forward to the City Council the Findings and Recommendation of the Spokane Valley Planning Commission for CPA-2022-01, CPA-2022- 02, CPA-2022-03, and CPA-2022-04. STAFF CONTACT: Chaz Bates, AICP, Planning Manager ATTACHMENTS: General Findings and Recommendation for CPA-2022-01, CPA-2022-02, CPA-2022-03, and CPA-2022- 04; Attachments 1, 2, 3, and 4 for the Specific Findings and Recommendation for CPA-2022-01, CPA- 2022-02, CPA-2022-03, and CPA-2022-04 Please bring your Yellow Binder to the meeting. RPCA Findings for 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Page 1 of 1 Siokane Walley COMMUNITY & PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT BUILDING & PLANNING DIVISION STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION CPA-2022-01 STAFF REPORT DATE: February 16, 2022 HEARING DATE AND LOCATION: March 10, 2022, beginning at 6:00 p.m., remotely via Zoom. Project Number: CPA-2022-01 Application Description: A request to change the comprehensive plan designation and zoning for 1.03 acres Single Family Residential (SFR) to Multifamily Residential (MFR). Location: Parcels 45204.1436 and 45204.1435; SE 1/4 of Section 20, Township 25 North, Range 44 East, Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washington Applicant: Dwight Hume, Land Use Solutions and Entitlement Owners: SHFI Properties, LLC Date of Application: October 26, 2021 Staff Contact: Chaz Bates, Planning Manager, 10210 E Sprague Avenue, Spokane Valley, WA 99206 APPROVAL CRITERIA: Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan, Title 17 Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) General Provisions, Title 19 SVMC Zoning Regulations, and Title 21 SVMC Environmental Controls. ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit 1: Proposed Comprehensive Plan Map Exhibit 7: Environmental Determination Exhibit 2: Proposed Zoning Map Exhibit 8: SEPA Checklist Exhibit 3: Vicinity Map Exhibit 9: Notice of Public Hearing Exhibit 4: 2020 Aerial Exhibit 10: Agency Comments Exhibit 5: Existing Comprehensive Plan Map Exhibit 11: Public Comments Exhibit 6: Existing Zoning A. BACKGROUND INFORMATION PROPERTY INFORMATION Size and Characteristics: The property consists of two vacant parcels totaling 1.03 acres, located on Raymond Road between 10th and 11th Avenue. Comprehensive Plan: Single Family Residential (SFR) Zoning: Single Family Residential (R-3) Existing Use: Vacant (former apai linent complex on north parcel and single family building on the south parcel) Page 1 of 6 Staff Report CPA-2022-01 SURROUNDING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. ZONING. AND LAND USES North Comprehensive Plan: SFR Zoning: R-3 Uses: Single family residences and adult family homes South Comprehensive Plan: SFR Zoning: R-3 Uses: Single-family residence East Comprehensive Plan: SFR Zoning: R-3 Uses: Single-family residences West Comprehensive Plan: MFR Zoning: MFR Uses: Sunshine Health Care facility, assisted living facility APPLICATION PROCESSING: Chapter 17.80 Permit Processing Procedures in the SVMC. The following summarizes key application procedures for the proposal. Application Submitted: October 2, 2019 SEPA Determination of Non -Significance Issue date January 14, 2022 End of Appeal Period for DNS: January 28, 2022 Date of Mailed Notice of Public Hearing February 18, 2022 Date of Published Notice of Public Hearing: February 11 and 18, 2022 SUMMARY AND IMPLICATIONS OF PROPOSED AMENDMENT: If adopted the amendment will change the comprehensive plan land use designation and zoning to MFR which allows more intensive residential uses, including assisted living facilities. The current zoning of R- 3 does not allow assisted living facilities. B. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO SEPA 1. Findings: Pursuant to Title 21 (Environmental Controls) SVMC, the lead agency has determined that the proposal does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). The City issued a Determination of Non -Significance (DNS) for the proposal on January 14, 2022. The determination was made after review of a completed environmental checklist, the application, Titles 19, 21, and 22 of the SVMC, a site assessment, public and agency comments, the Comprehensive Plan and associated Environmental Impact Statement. 2. Conclusion(s): The procedural requirements of the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) and Title 21 SVMC have been fulfilled. C. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT AND AREA -WIDE REZONE i. The City may approve Comprehensive Plan amendments and area -wide zone map amendments if it finds that compliance with the approval criteria in SVMC 17.80.140(H). Page 2 of 6 Staff Report CPA-2022-01 (1) The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to the public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment; Analysis: The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to the public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment. The City continues to see increasing population growth with 2020 Census estimates showing a population of just over 102,000; in 2016 the estimate from the Office of Financial Management was 94,160. More recently, the City adopted a Housing Action Plan that shows that seniors (age 65+) are continuing to increase their share of the City's population. This age group includes those in need of assisted living arrangements. Based on conversations with the applicant Sunshine Health, they are requesting a change to MFR to meet future demand for multifamily development that can accommodate an assisted living facility near their existing facility to the west. The change helps meet existing and future demand; helps protect the environment by building in a developed area; helps Sunshine Health meet a needed public service in a cost-efficient manner. (2) The proposed amendment is consistent with the requirements of Chapter 36.70A RCW and with the portion of the City's adopted plan not affected by the amendment; Analysis: The proposed amendment is consistent with the requirements of Chapter 36.70A RCW and with the portion of the City's adopted Plan not affected by the amendment. The Growth Management Act (GMA) adopts 14 goals to guide the development of local comprehensive plans and development regulations. The request allows opportunity to provide an assisted living facility adjacent to an existing development owned by the same entity. There are no transportation improvements planned adjacent to the site within the planning horizon of 2037. The proposal does not conflict with any other GMA goals. The amendment is not in conflict with any other portions of the Comprehensive Plan. (3) The proposed amendment responds to a substantial change in conditions beyond the property owner's control applicable to the area within which the subject property lies; Analysis: The proposed amendment is not in response to a change in conditions beyond the property owner's control. (4) The proposed amendment corrects an obvious mapping error; or Analysis: The amendment is not in response to a mapping error. (5) The proposed amendment addresses an identified deficiency in the Comprehensive Plan. Analysis: The City has seen continued population growth especially in age segments that often seek multifamily developments (millennials and seniors). Increasing opportunity for multifamily development in areas that are supported by existing infrastructure provides an opportunity to meet adopted goals, policies, and strategies for housing needs. The proposed amendment provides an additional tool and opportunity to meet the City's housing needs. The Comprehensive Plan identifies the following goals and policy that support the proposed change: H-G2 Enable the development of affordable housing for all income levels. CF-P2 Optimize the use of existing public facilities before investing in new facilities. Page 3 of 6 Staff Report CPA-2022-01 ii. The City must also consider the following factors prior to approving Comprehensive Plan amendments: (6) The effect upon the physical environment; Analysis: The change to MFR will allow for expanded uses including multifamily housing and assisted living facilities. The properties will have the opportunity to transition, add density and add different uses including assisted living facilities. There is no concern on effect of physical environment. (7) (8) (9) The effect on open space, streams, rivers, and lakes; Analysis: There are no known critical areas associated with the site, such as wetlands, fish and wildlife habitat areas, frequently flooded areas or geologically hazardous areas. The parcel is not located within shoreline jurisdiction, and there are no known surface water quality or quantity issues. Chapter 21.40 SVMC will ensure adequate protection of critical areas. The compatibility with and impact on adjacent land uses and surrounding neighborhoods; Analysis: The parcels are currently vacant. A multifamily building was located on the northern parcel but was demolished in 2017. The adjacent use west is the existing Sunshine Health facility that provides a variety of health related services including assisted living. West of the existing Sunshine Health facility is Valley Christian School; to the north, east, and south are single-family residences. All the properties except for the existing Sunshine Health facility are designated Single Family Residential and zoned R-3. If the amendment is approved any future development would be subject to the City's transitional provision. The adequacy of and impact on community facilities including utilities, roads, public transportation, parks, recreation, and schools; Analysis: Raymond Avenue and 10th and 11th Roads are Local Access streets. There are no planned transportation projects in the area. The nearest City recreational facility is Appleway Trail approximately'/ mile to the north. The closest formal City park is Balfour Park approximately one mile to the north. A project on the site would be considered infill development, as such, the expansion of allowed uses and increased densities are supported by the infrastructure that is in place. (10) The benefit to the neighborhood, City, and region; Analysis: The proposed change would allow the property to increase density and support infill development in an area planned for urban growth. The change will support the identified need for housing. The change benefits the neighborhood, City, and region by supporting the following adopted Comprehensive Plan goals: H-G1 Allow for a broad range of housing opportunities to meet the needs of the community. H-G2 Enable the development of affordable housing for all income levels. (11) The quantity and location of land planned for the proposed land use type and density and the demand for such land; Analysis: The proposal would add approximately one acre of MFR property. The MFR designation in this location would allow for increased options for Page 4 of 6 Staff Report CPA-2022-01 development including an assisted living facility in an area adjacent to an existing facility. The proposal is limited to a reasonable area and impacts to adjacent Single Family Residential zones would be mitigated by the adopted transitional provisions. (12) The current and projected population density in the area; and Analysis: Currently, the site allows for 8 dwelling units per acre. If the proposal is approved it will allow for 22 dwelling units per acre resulting in a net increase of 14 dwelling units. The proposed change would have little impact on overall population density. (13) The effect upon other aspects of the Comprehensive Plan. Analysis: The MFR designation will support the goals and policies identified above. The amendment will have no effect on other elements of the Comprehensive Plan, including Housing, Capital Facilities and Public Services, Public and Private Utilities, Parks and Open Space and Natural Resources. Conclusion(s): For the reasons outlined above the proposed amendment is consistent with SVMC 17.80.140(H). D. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO PUBLIC COMMENTS 1. Findings: Staff has received no public comments to date. Comments received following the date of this staff report will be provided to the Planning Commission at the March 10, 2022 meeting. 2. Conclusion(s): Notice of Public Hearing (NOPH) was published on February 11 and 18, 2022. The NOPH was posted on site on February 17, 2022 and mailed on February 18, 2022 to residents within an 400 foot radius. E. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO AGENCY COMMENTS 1. Findings: Staff has not received any agency comments of significance to date. Agency Received Comments Comments Dated City of Spokane Valley Senior Traffic Engineer City of Spokane Valley Development Engineering City of Spokane Valley Building & Planning City of Spokane Valley Parks & Recreation Spokane Valley Fire Department City of Millwood City of Liberty Lake City of Spokane City of Spokane Valley Police Department Spokane County, Building and Planning Spokane County, Environmental Services Spokane County, Clean Air Agency Page 5 of 6 Staff Report CPA-2022-01 Spokane County, Fire District No. 1 Spokane County, Fire District No. 8 Spokane County Regional Health District Spokane Regional Clean Air Agency Spokane Aquifer Joint Board Spokane Transit Authority (STA) Spokane Regional Transportation Council (SRTC) Washington State Dept of Commerce Washington State Dept of Ecology (Olympia) Washington State Dept of Ecology (Spokane) Washington State Dept of Fish & Wildlife Washington State Dept of Natural Resources Washington State Dept of Transportation Washington State Parks & Recreation Commission WA Archaeological & Historic Preservation Avista Utilities Inland Power & Light Modern Electric Water Company Central Valley School District #356 East Valley School District #361 West Valley School District #363 Century Link Comcast Model Irrigation District #18 Consolidated Irrigation District #19 East Spokane Water District #1 Vera Water & Power Spokane County Water District #3 Spokane Tribe of Indians 2. Conclusion(s): No concerns are noted. F. CONCLUSION: For the reasons set forth in Section C above, the proposed amendment to amend the Comprehensive Plan and adopt the area -wide rezone to change the land use designation and zoning to of parcels 45204.1436 and 45204.1435 to MFR complies with the requirements of SVMC 17.80.140(H) and the Comprehensive Plan. Page 6 of 6 EXHIBIT 1 Proposed Comprehensive Plan Map E 9th Ave II S Balfour Rd S Raymond Rd E 10th Ave E Ilth Ave S Oberlin Rd Legend C M U •V1V1V1V11 M F R MU IMU I NC N 1�1 E 9th Ave E 10th Ave N CD cn o. E.11th-Ln_ E 12th Ave i POS RC SFR rLJ 1 I I 0 50 100 200 300 400 Feet File: CPA-2022-01 Owner: SHFI Properties (Sunshine Health) Parcel(s): 45204.1436 and 45204.1435 Address: 10506 E 10th and Unaddressed Request: Proposed change: Comp Plan Map: SFR to MFR Zoning Map: R-3 to MFR EXHIBIT 2 Proposed Zoning Map E 9th Ave S Balfour Rd S Raymond Rd E 10th Ave E Ilth Ave E 13th Ave S Oberlin Rd Legend Zoning MI R-1 R-2 R-3 R-4 A E9thAve E 10th Ave (r) CD cn 11thart E 12th Ave i MFR CMU POS RC NC all IMU MU rLJ 1 I I 0 50 100 200 300 400 Feet File: CPA-2022-01 Owner: SHFI Properties (Sunshine Health) Parcel(s): 45204.1436 and 45204.1435 Address: 10506 E 10th and Unaddressed Request: Proposed change: Comp Plan Map: SFR to MFR Zoning Map: R-3 to MFR EXHIBIT 3 Vicinity E--i alleyway Ave— z tMain @) 0 E 1st q.Ve_ � a thAueLI IN , 0E6 t h Ave E 7th E 7th Ave -I 1 Ave EArchery.,,, ,— Ave --.+. Ct 1--E-Main Awe—Erm---� E Main Ave _Par z z k EApplewaySiva. y` E E 5th t 5th Ave Ln E 6th Ave � N N Ai.-- E 10th E10th-6 Ave - 4 n cn �` t- z cn i \L 4 0 to tP�k () u_ E 9th Ave Central Valley Early Learning Ce o �,.E 14th Ave E15thAve ca a 6 t E 17th Ln E18th Ave c"P E19thAve ,pq, E dui 20th & Ave (13 (f) File: CPA-2022-01 Owner: SHFI Properties (Sunshine Health) Parcel(s): 45204.1436 and 45204.1435 Address: 10506 E 10th and Unaddressed E 11th Ave E-NixonAve ErSpragueA've E-3rd Ave E 4th Ave E 5th~Ct E 6th Ave E Valleyway Ave 3 m E 2nd Ave E 7th Ave— E 8th Ave E 9th Ave--E-9thAve a) c) E11th E11tha L-n— to—cn Ln i (a co 14th E 15th- I.ve Ln Er16th Ave irs University Elementary vh —E 18th Ave E19thAve = E 20th Ave a) E 21st Ave E 22nd Ave E 1st Ave E6thAve r E 10thAve—E 11th —Ave Opportunity Elementary. E 12th Ave to E 14th Ln to 3 r; E17thAve 0 ca E 18th Ave —a) — 0 Bowdish Middle Request: Proposed change: Comp Plan Map: SFR to MFR Zoning Map: R-3 to MFR EXHIBIT 4 2020 Aerial File: CPA-2022-01 Owner: SHFI Properties (Sunshine Health) Parcel(s): 45204.1436 and 45204.1435 Address: 10506 E 10th and Unaddressed Request: Proposed change: Comp Plan Map: SFR to MFR Zoning Map: R-3 to MFR EXHIBIT 5 Exisitng Comprehensive Plan Map E 9th Ave II S Balfour Rd S Raymond Rd E 10th Ave E Ilth Ave S Oberlin Rd Legend C M U •V1V1V1V1 IMU MFR MU NC 1�1 E 9th Ave E 10th Ave N CD cn o. E.11th-Ln_ E 12th Ave i POS RC SFR rLJ 1 I I 0 50 100 200 300 400 Feet File: CPA-2022-0X Owner: SHFI Properties (Sunshine Health) Parcel(s): 45204.1436 and 45204.1435 Address: 10506 E 10th and Unaddressed Request: Proposed change: Comp Plan Map: SFR to MFR Zoning Map: R-3 to MFR EXHIBIT 6 Exisitng Zoning Map E 9th Ave S Balfour Rd S Raymond Rd E 13th Ave E 10th Ave E Ilth Ave S Oberlin Rd Legend Zoning 11111111 j//>, R-1 R-2 R-3 R-4 N E 9th Ave E 10th Ave N CD cn o. E.-11th-Ln- E 12th Ave i MFR CMU POS RC NC IMU MU rLJ 1 I I 0 50 100 200 300 400 Feet File: CPA-2022-01 Owner: SHFI Properties (Sunshine Health) Parcel(s): 45204.1436 and 45204.1435 Address: 10506 E 10th and Unaddressed Request: Proposed change: Comp Plan Map: SFR to MFR Zoning Map: R-3 to MFR EXHIBIT 7 Spakane 4,000Valley COMMUNITY & PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE 10210 East Sprague Avenue • Spokane Valley WA 99206 509.720.5000 • Fax: 509.720.5075 • planning@spokanevalley.org PROJECT: Annual amendments to the Comprehensive Plan for 2022: File Number Description Location Applicant/Owner CPA-2022-01 A request to change the comprehensive plan designation and zoning for 1.03 acres Single Family Residential (SFR) to Multifamily Residential (MFR). Parcels 45204.1436 and 45204.1435; SE'/ of Section 20, Township 25 North, Range 44 East, Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washington SHFI PROPERTIES, LLC/ Land Use Solutions and Entitlement CPA-2022-02 A request to change land use designation and zoning for 0.45 acres from Single Family Residential to Parks and Open Space. Parcel: 55073.0458; SW'/ of Section 07, Township 25 North, Range 45 East, Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washington Spokane Valley/ Spokane Valley CPA-2022-03 A request to change land use designation and zoning for 17.64 acres from Single Family Residential to Parks and Open Space. Parcels: 44041.0104; 44041.0103; 44041.0102; 44041.9048; 44041.9046; and 44041.9007; NE'/ of Section 04, Township 24 North, Range 44 East, Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washington Spokane Valley/ Spokane Valley CPA-2022-04 A request to amend Figure 27 — Bikeway Network to add north river loop trail. Citywide; Spokane Valley Spokane Valley/ Not applicable LEAD AGENCY: City of Spokane Valley. DETERMINATION: Determination of Non -Significance is issued under Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 197- 11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date issued. Comments must be received by 5:00 p.m. on January 28, 2022. Pursuant to Title 21, Environmental Controls of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC), the lead agency has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement is not required under Revised Code of Washington 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. STAFF CONTACT: Chaz Bates, AICP, Senior Planner, City of Spokane Valley, 10210 East Sprague Avenue, Spokane Valley, WA 99206, PH: (509) 720-5337; cbates rr spokanevallev_.org RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: Mike Basinger, AICP, Economic Development Manager, City of Spokane Valley, 10210 East Sprague Avenue, Spokane Valley, WA 99206, PH: (509) 720-5333, mbasin2er a,spokanevallev.or2 DATE ISSUED: January 14, 2022 SIGNATURE:_A,j APPEAL: An appeal of this determination shall be submitted to the Community & PutiKc Works Department within fourteen (14) calendar days after the date issued. The appeal must be written and specific factual objections made to the City's threshold determination. Appeals shall be conducted in conformance with SVMC 17.90 Appeals, and any required fees pursuant to the City's adopted Fee Schedule shall be paid at the time of appeal submittal. Pursuant to WAC 197-11- 680, appeals shall be limited to a review of a final threshold determination. City of Spokane Valley Determination of Non -Significance (DNS) Page 1 of 1 File Nos. CPA-2022-01; CPA-2022-02; CPA-2022-03; CPA-2022-04 EXHIBIT 8 Project #tea -,0Z-.2 RECEIVE© O C T 2 6 2021 SEPA CHECKLIST SVMC 21.20 102 U'I E Sprague Avenue ♦ Spokane Valley WA 99206 CQSV Ph i 1✓Cf,ii Ct ♦ Fax: (5091 7 0-5075 • permiteenier/1 spok: nevalle),o STAFF USE ONLY Date Submitted:. SUB # j REV. # r-1 Received by: Fee: PLUS #: File #: PART I — REQUIRED MATERIAL **THE APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF THE REQUIRED MATERIALS ARE NOT PROVIDED** • Completed SEPA Checklist ® Application Fee ❑ Reduced Site Plan of proposal in 8A" by 11" or 11" by 17" size ❑ Trip Distribution and Generation Letter, if requested by Development Engineering. PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST: The State Environmental policy Act (SEPA), chapter 4 s 2.1( RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before mak decisions. An environmental impact star - is--nt (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the envirr�r r r t. Ti e purpose of this checklist is to provide information to l,"-il And the agency identify impacts from your ::roposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an E15. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and caref. should be able to answer the questions from you. experts. If you really do not know the answer, or it know" or "does not apply." Complete answers to till-. .'ily, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you r, ..;i)servations or project plans without the need to hire does not apply to your proposal, write "do not I.,.t =tions now may avoid unnecessary ::ic•lays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as toning, shoreline, and landne-A i :;:.: rations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies car; :S:.t i The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NON -PROJECT PROPOSALS: Complete this checklist for non -project proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NON -PROJECT ACTIONS (Part D). SEPA, CHECKLIST For non -project actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1, Name of proposed project, if applicable: N/A 2. Name of applicant: Land Use Solutions & Entitlement for Sunshine Health Facilities Address and phone number o+,ind contact person: Dwight Hume agent 9101 Mt. View Lane Spokane WA 99218 509-435-3108 Sunshine Health Facilities owner, Dr. Nathan Drakes CEO 10410 E 9" Avenue Spokane valley WA 99206 509-926-3547 4 Date checklist prepared: October 2021 5. Agency requesting checklist: Spokane valley Planning & Zoning 6. Proposed timing or schedule (includir+g phasing, if applicable): Summer/Fall 2022 Construction 7. Do you have any plans 'or future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? No It yes, explain 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. None 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? Unknown If yes, explain. 10 List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment; site plan review and approval; construction plan review and approval, landscape plan review and approval. Page 2 of 13 PL-22 V1.0 SEPA CHECKLIST Spot' t aw lley. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) Non -Project Action, Map Amendment of the Comprehensive Plan from SFR to MFR and from R3 to MFR zoning. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the pr::,.: ,:° ! :: <+tion of your proposed project, including street : .,.r�,s, if any. •,r ertior,. ' nship, and range . , roposal would occur over a range of area prr:vide the r,y2, u, ': uur,rierr 1,-, o1 itie site(s). r site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any., lei: ir•. required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit. applications related to this checklist. The subject property consists of two parcels totaling 1.04 acres, bordered by 10" Avenue on the north, Raymond Rd on the west and 11t Avenue on the south. It is located to the east of Sunshine Health Facilities and Valley Christian Schools along the west side of Raymond Rd. 13, Does the proposed action lie within the Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA)? Yes The general S:.. er Se, ya Yes Priority Sev, _s_ r Hie ,_: •;; 4: ,r ? Yes (See: Spokane County's ASA Overlay zone Atlas for boundaries). 14_ The following questions supplement Part A: a. Critical Aquifer Recharge Area (CARA) / Aquifer Sensitive Area NASA). 1. Describe any systems, other than those designed for the dis; _,sal of sanitary waste, installed for the purpose of discharging fluids below the ground surface (inciu.ies s\, .torns ,:,:.h as those for the disposal of stormwater or drainage from floor drains). Descr i,_: t ie tVl i System, the amount of materials to be disposed of Trough the system and the typr ; of materi::rl likely to be disposed of (including materials which rr,.: [r,Tc r the system inadver:. it1. 'I ir.Hr,,l '.;pills or as a result of firefighting activities) Non -project Action, to be determined at a later date. 2. Will any chemicals (especially organic solvents or petroleum fuels) be stored it ..,!:r_ ;r'r,r,rrnd or undergroumi Storage tanks? If so, what types and quantities of material wiII be stare i Non -project Action, to be determined at a later date. What protective measures will be taken to •!:,:, t!.at Ic,, .:s or spills of any chemicals stored or used on site will not be allowed to percolate to grounciwa' r_ r r,. hides measures to keep chemicals out of disposal systems_ Non -project Action, to be determined at a tater date. Page 3of13 PL-22 V1.0 SF:PA CHECKLIST ne .00 Val ley 4. Will any chemicals L. h, idled or u c .+.: i. « a location where a spill or leak will drain to surface or gror.r.:!;.:,, .: r to a storrnwai r s,::tem discharging to surface or groundwater? Non -project Action, to be determined at a later date. b. Stormwater 1. What are the depths on the site to groundwater and to bedrock (if known)? Unknown 2. Will stormwater be discharged into the graaind? If so, describe any potential impacts. Non -project Action, to be determined at a later date. B. Environment:, I- I, r,Cr L , 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): flatrolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? N/A c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, much)? If you know the classification of agricultural souls, specify them and note any prime farmland. Gravel d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Also indicate source of fill- Non -project Action, to be determined at a later date. Could erosion occur z . a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Non -project Action, to be determined at a later date. g About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Non -project Action, to be determined at a later date. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosi+xr or other impacts to the earth, if any: Non -project Action, to be determined at a later date.. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, and industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Non -project Action, to be deterrined at a later date. Page 4 of 13 PL-22 V1.0 SEPA CHECKLIST *lam b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No c Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Non -project Action, to be determined at a later date. 3. Water a. Surface: 1. Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the si: r 1,1 :: i.l iin year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe tyi' and pro, lac names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. No. 2. Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, plr ., ri„,.- he :ind attach available plans. No. 3. Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected and the source of fill material. N/A 4. Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? No Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. 5. Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? No If so, note location on the site plan. 6. Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No b. Ground: 1. Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be :I ;. i:.)r- :; ".:rtid water' Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities known. Non -project Action, to be determined at a Iater date. 2. Describe waste material that will be disch�,r:ir .i ;rito the ground from septic tank,, ;r other sources, if any {for example: Domestic sewage; indust al con, wining the .:a,,r!, L. ur al; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the i., !:; r c.! r. ,u ,::• t hr served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) area ;pectk to serve. Page 5 of 13 PL-22 V1.0 SEPA CHECKLIST Stiokanel" .„01Mi11ev Non -project Action, to be determined at a later date. c. Water runoff (including storruwaterl: 1. Describe the source of runoff (including stormwater) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Nan -project Action, to be determined at a later date 2. Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? Non -project Action, to be determined at a tater date. If so, generally describe_ d. Proposed measure!, to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Non -project Action, to be determined at a later date. 4. Plants a. Circle types of vegetation found on the site: 1. Deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other 2. Evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other 3. Shrubs 4. Grass 5. Pasture 6. Crop or grain 7. Wet sr,Il plants; cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other 8. Water r i.-n ,' ;. r, ater lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other 9. Other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Non -project Action, to be determined at a later date. !1st threatened or endangers::.»i .. ?: .n.:_,wn to be on or near the site. Unknown but unlikely due to urban setting. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plan, ., or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Unknown but unlikely due to urban setting. 5. Animals a Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: 1. Birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other 2. Mammals: deer, bear, elk, heaver, other 3 Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other Page S of 13 PL-22 V1.0 SIP A ('I!L['i.:I.lS I Stidcanel b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Unknown c. Is the site part off a migration route? no If sa,, explain. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None b. Energy and natural resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Mon -project Action, to be determined at a later date. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally: describe. Non -project Action. to be determined at a later date_ c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this prorresal? List other measures to reduce or control energy impacts, Nort-project Action, to be determined at a later date 7. Environmental health a. Are there any environmental heal including expn•, , to •.Ic : ,, .::I k >f fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste that .:,,. Icl occur as a result of this pr_;posal? No If so, describe_ Describe special emergency services that might be required, None Proposed measures to reduce or control el health hazards, if any: Non -project Action, to be determined at a later date. b. Noise 1. What types of ,,;;,t .::istinthe area which nay alr..:, i L.rH:t;f. :t7i • t;,afli •Fquiprnent.. operation, other).alone 2. What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site, Mon -project Action, to be determined at a later date 3. Proposed measures to reduce or coot roi noise impacts, if any: Non -project Action, to be determined at a later date 8. Land and shoreline use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? West: Health facilities and private school; Page 7 of 13 PL-22 V1,0 SEPA CHFCKLIST .r Thlr,. .00 ley North: residential, East Residential; South: Residential b. Has the site been used for agriculture? No If so, describe. c. Describe any structures on the site. None d. Will any structures be demolished? N/A If so, what? e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? R3 f. What is the current compreh -rr`; •; r l:,f+ do' of the site? SFR r("• f !: i�A` f ',f.i .I •lfl.,i Yi -f 1h i• if<'? N/A h. Has any part of the site been r.Lr •'fled as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. Unknown . Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Non -project Action, to be determined at a later date j. Approximately how marry people would the completed project displace? None k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: N/A I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans. If any: Compliance with applicable development regulations 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provide, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Non -project Action, to be determined at a later date b. ApproxiimatPH, how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income hoi.l>ing. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: If approved, this will enable construction of senior adult care housing. 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas? What is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? Non -project Action, to be determined at a Page 8of 13 PL-22 V1.0 SEPA CHECKLIST Spokane Valley later date h. Wheat views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Non -project Action, to be determined at a later date. c. Proposr. to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Non -project Action, to be determined at a later date. 11. Light and glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce" What time of day would it mainly occur? Non -project Action, to be determined at a later date b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety ha yard or interfere with views? Non -project Action, to be determined at a later date c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Non -project Action, to be determined at a later date 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Valley Christian School athletic fields are available for passive recreation. f�. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? No If so, describe. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None 13. Historic and cultural preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? No If so, generally describe. b_ Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None c_ Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None 14. Transportation Page 9 of 13 PL-22 V1.0 SI:I'.t ('FIEC0.I_ISi 9t j� a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe r :ai :-s:,t: ,access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Raymond Rd. will provide direct access. 10`h & 11"h Avenue s would provide secondary access. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Route 96 is on University Rd and 16th to Pines Rd How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate' Non -project Action, to be determined at a later date. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to exis1,r, r.• +ri . :r ;tr.°c-+:_., not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether Non -project Action, to be determined at a later date. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? No Non - project Action, to be determined at a later date. If so, generally describe. Note: This is for senior assisted living. Trips to and from the site by tenants will be minimal and determined on the individual needs and capabilities of each tenant. How in ny vehICUIEl t'r.l : r . r day would be generated by the completed project' Non -project Action, to be determined at a later date. if known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. g Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: Non -project Action, to be determined at a later date. 15, Public services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If ,o. Generally describe. Non -project Action, to be determined at a later date, Note: This is being proposed in proximity to numerous health care services of the applicant. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. See above 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: I. Electricity 2. Natural gas 3. Water 4, Refuse service 5. Telephone Page 10 of 13 PL-22 V1.0 SFPA CHECKLIST Fa e �►�'V�i�ey 6. Sanitary sewer 7. Septic Servh,-- S. Other-det,crii:;e .riF)er Uptics b. Describe tutilitie : i,Ert are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction aLtivitic on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Non -project Action, to be determined at a later date. C. Signature The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make1t decision. Signature: Date: /�'f �f_'/ submitted: D. Supplemental Sheet for Non -Project Actions (Do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent of the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affec the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? None of these impacts would occur from a senior housing assisted living project. a. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: N/A How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? No impacts would occur. a. Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: None . How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? No impacts are foreseen. a. Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: None Page 11 of 13 PL-22 V1.0 SERA CHECKLIST 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or end fgered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? No impacts are foreseen. a. Proposed measures to protect sui:h rc ouic.(--; c r ttx :3'v'i)itI or N+_ii-a+, iripricts are: None 5. How would the propose f b :iI:E'i y' t() ;ttect i ,ncl :;nd shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline• uses incomt,iiible with existing plans? This is an area designated for residential living within the comprehensive plan. This map amendment and zone change would allow for an optimum use of the site for assisted senior housing in proximity to multiple health care services of the proponent. a. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: Development in full compliance with applicable development regulations. 6. How would the proposal be likely to ncreasc demands on transportation or public services and utilities? These demands would be minimal due to the available health care services provided in proximity to the proposed site. a. Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: See above comment 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. No conflicts are foreseen from this proposed map amendment. E. Signature I, the irncl r,JFned, swear under penalty of perjury that the above responses are made truthfully and to the best of my knowlc c4 e. , ,_zlsw ancierstand that, should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure an my part, the al_?411cy may withdraw any Determination of : 'ificance that it might issue in reliance upon this check list. Date: Please print or type: Proponent: Dwight Hume, agent Signature: PL-22 V1.0 Page 12 of 13 SEPA CHECKLIST ilok e ..■' Vallee Address; 9101 N Mt. View Lane Spokane WA 99218 Phone: 509-435-3108 Person completing form (if d fferent from proponent): Name: Address: Phone; DISCLAIMER: By accepting this permit and proceeding with the work, the applicant/permittee and owner acknowledges and agrees that: 1) If this permit is for construction of or on a dwelling, the dwelting is/will be served by potable water. 2) Ownership of this City of Spokane Valley permit inures to the property owner. 3) The appiicantlpennittee is the property owner or has full permission and authority to represelii rare ;.:io!::: !iv owner in this project and carry out the work specified in the permit. 4 ) Lill constructir is to be done in full cols i;.::ii,;r::± with the City of Spokane Valley Municipal Code. The applicable coiiir,s :a, availa r: rr; review at the City of ti l ks;ii? 'valley Permit Center_ 5) The applicarttlpermittee further declare`-, tilat th' y IH.r- (A) a contractor currerrriylo.i.sleied and properly licensed in accordance with Chapter .1 ROW; (6) 'i.: ,: 4t si,: erg or legal owner or authrur rile property for which I am applying for permit arrd not a Iicer r^r:,,:tor; or (C) otherwi ;(:. ,_xempt from the requirements set forth in RCW 18.27.090 and will abide by all prove-kins and conditions of the exemption as stated. 6) The City of Spokane Valley permit is a permit to carry out the work. as specifre0. '.' T_ i eirl and r •• ,,,rat a permit or approval for any violation of fede. al. state or local laws. codes or ordinances- 7) Conrf.: , i; ::l : ra: state, ar Iyr: al laws ::, t r n:,sponsibility of the applicantlpermittee and property owner. 8) P :3 r , :: :i i pit : it in`Q!it ation may be r rr ,:, r > ne submitted and subsequently approved before this application can he I ii is not resoonsiti:e. code violation through the issuance of this permit. 9) Failure to request arr,i ;rr: i'e necessary inspections r ,'i-.i:r'etion approvals may necessitate stoppage of work and/or removal of cerr;-; parts of the construction .:;' .r : i. plicant's/permittee's or property owner's expense. Page 13 of 13 PL-22 V1.0 10/25/21, 8:42 AM City of Spokane Valley Zoning City of Spokane Valley Lon►r E �rliArc' E 11h..: r rf. ''iF' t egpnd E 7lh Av3 SOI:.rlinRI E 1'71h Av E 11117 ±^. L 13th s, Layer List E 14th Ave https://spokanevalley. maps.arcgis.comiappsiwebappviewer/index.html7id-f5e8d56d 1238413da9ea3fd7c 18eeb14 1/1 10/25/21, 8:42 AM City of Spokane Valley Zoning C cpokane Va i ey Zoning E 411 S HferaA Rd E Ih Ave T1 3 Ott rim Rd E 1'31h Avt E 11th k.,e L 13th Ave CC E I 4th oVie Layer List https;//spokanevalfey,maps.arc s.com/apps/webappvieweriindex.html?id=f5e8d56d1238413da9ea3fd7c18eeb14 1/1 10/25/21, 8:44 AM City of Spokane Valley Land Use of Spokane Valley Land Os( F 1 --'1h Ave !". Ave Leg e nci 5gK " Si••• „ 0.• *". E 0 E S Ott. rim RJ E 10th Avt E 11 th Ave L 13th Avr. Layer List E 14th Ave Oi;erlio Rd https://spokanevalley.map&arcgis.corniapps/webappviewerfindex.htmOid=4cf27c6c22d43137b919e338dica7aba 1/1 10/25/21, 8:44 AM City of Spokane Valley Land Use Wkane City of Spokane Valley Lai lc E ';,..q11 Ave E 1::!th AVE F 1 th L.,7:c:Jend S herald Fd E 9111 Ave E tr: S 01:e. di rt E 17th Ave E 111h Ave h 13th Vi? Layer List E I 4th Aie CC .1- ttps://spokanevailey.nnaps.a raj is.comfa p p siweba ppviewe riind ex.html? =4 cf27c6c22c143b7 b919 e338dtca la b a 111 EXHIBIT 9 Notice of Virtual Public Hearing City of Spokane Valley 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Due to the restrictions on public gatherings arising from the covid-19 outbreak, and pursuant to Govemor Inslee's Stay Home, Stay Healthy Proclamation (No. 20-25) and Proclamation 20-28 (and associated extensions), this hearing will be conducted remotely using web and telephone conference tools, as described below. HEARING DATE AND TIME: March 10, 2022, beginning at 6:00 p.m. ZOOM MEETING DETAILS: Join Zoom Meeting A link to the Zoom meeting will be provided on the agenda and posted to the Planning Commission webpage: www.spokanevalley.org/planningcommission. HEARING BODY: Spokane Valley Planning Commission The Planning Commission will hold a public hearing to receive public comment on the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment requests and make a recommendation to the City Council on each of the following applications: FILE No. CPA-2022-01: A request to change the comprehensive plan designation and zoning for 1.03 acres Single Family Residential (SFR) to Multifamily Residential (MFR) for parcels 45204.1436 and 45204.1435; SE 1/4 of Section 20, Township 25 North, Range 44 East, Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washington FILE No. CPA-2022-02: A request to change land use designation and zoning for 0.45 acres from Single Family Residential (SFR) to Parks and Open Space (POS) for parcel: 55073.0458; SW 1/4 of Section 07, Township 25 North, Range 45 East, Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washington FILE No. CPA-2022-03 A request to change land use designation and zoning for 17.64 acres from Single Family Residential (SFR) to Parks and Open Space (POS) for parcels: 44041.0104; 44041.0103; 44041.0102; 44041.9048; 44041.9046; and 44041.9007; NE 1/4 of Section 04, Township 24 North, Range 44 East, Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washington FILE No. CPA-2022-04: A request to amend Figure 27 — Bikeway Network to add north river loop trail. STAFF CONTACT: Chaz Bates, AICP, Senior Planner; (509) 720-5337 cbates@spokanevalley.org ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: The City issued a Determination of Non -significance (DNS) on January 14, 2022 pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) and chapter 21.20 Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC). HEARING PROCEDURES: The Planning Commission will conduct the remote hearing pursuant to the rules of procedure adopted in SVMC Title 18 (Boards and Authorities). The public is encouraged to submit written comments prior to the hearing by sending the comments to Chaz Bates, 10210 E Sprague Ave, Spokane Valley, WA 99206, or email to cbates@spokanevalley.org. You may also hand deliver your comments to City Hall. All comments will need to be received by 4:00 PM on March 9, 2022, for them to be prepared for submission into the record. Comments received will be entered into the record at the time of the public participation portion of the Public Hearing. All interested persons may testify at the remote public hearing via the zoom meeting address and/or phone number. Interested persons will need to sign up to speak no later than 4:00 p.m. on March 10, 2022. Please visit the Planning Commission webpage (see link above) to sign up for oral public comments. This is not an opportunity for questions or discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes per person. Written comments and documents may only be submitted prior to the hearing. Any appeal of the Planning Commission's decision will be based on the record established before the Planning Commission, pursuant to SVMC 17.90 (Appeals). The Planning Commission will forward a recommendation on the request to the Spokane Valley City Council. STAFF REPORT AND INSPECTION OF FILE: A staff report will be available for inspection seven (7) calendar days before the hearing. The staff report and application file may be inspected by visiting the Comprehensive Plan webpage at www.spokanevalley.org/CP. If you have any questions, please contact Chaz Bates, Senior Planner, Economic Development Division, at cbates@spokanevalley.org. Carrie Koudelka, CMC Spokane Valley Deputy City Clerk Publish: February 11, 2022 and February 18, 2022 EXHIBIT 10 STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY 4601 N Monroe Street • Spokane, Washington 99205-1295 • (509)329-3400 January 27, 2022 Chaz Bates, AICP Senior Planner City of Spokane Valley 10210 East Sprague Avenue Spokane Valley, WA 99206 Re: 2022 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment File: CPA-2022-01, 02, 03, and 04 Dear Chaz Bates: Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the Determination of Nonsignificance regarding the 2022 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment (Proponent: City of Spokane Valley and Land Use Solutions). After reviewing the documents, the Department of Ecology (Ecology) submits the following comments: Water Quality Program -Shannon Adams (509) 329-3610 The four SEPA Checklists for the four Comprehensive Plan Amendments appear to be "non -project actions" related to zone changes. Please keep in mind that future soil disturbances at the individual sites may require separate SEPA review. If any of these future projects disturb over one acre of soil and discharge off site, they may also require a Construction Stormwater General Permit. For more information in obtaining a Construction Stormwater General Permit, or for other technical assistance, please contact Shannon Adams at (509) 329-3610 or via email at Shannon.Adams@ecy.wa.gov. State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA)-Cindy Anderson (509) 329-3442 Ecology bases comments upon information submitted for review. As such, comments made do not constitute an exhaustive list of the various authorizations you may need to obtain, nor legal requirements you may need to fulfill in order to carry out the proposed action. Applicants should remain in touch with their Local Responsible Officials or Planners for additional guidance. For information on the SEPA Process, please contact Cindy Anderson at (509) 329-3442 or via email at Cindy.Anderson@ecy.wa.gov. Chaz Bates January 27, 2022 Page 2 To receive more guidance on or to respond to the comments made by Ecology, please contact the appropriate staff listed above at the phone number or email provided. Department of Ecology Eastern Regional Office (Ecology File: 202200232) cc: Dwight Hume, Land Use Solutions EXHIBIT 11 Public Comments (Inserted as received) Spokane Walley COMMUNITY & PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT BUILDING & PLANNING DIVISION STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION CPA-2022-02 STAFF REPORT DATE: February 16, 2022 HEARING DATE AND LOCATION: March 3, 2022, beginning at 6:00 p.m., remotely via Zoom. Project Number: CPA-2022-02 Application Description: A request to change land use designation and zoning for.45 acres from Single Family Residential to Parks and Open Space. Location: Parcel: 55073.0458; SW 1/4 of Section 07, Township 25 North, Range 45 East, Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washington Applicant: City of Spokane Valley, 10210 E Sprague, Spokane Valley, WA 99206 Owners: City of Spokane Valley Date of Application: November 1, 2021 Staff Contact: Chaz Bates, Senior Planner, 10210 E Sprague Avenue, Spokane Valley, WA 99206 APPROVAL CRITERIA: Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan, Title 17 Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) General Provisions, Title 19 SVMC Zoning Regulations, and Title 21 SVMC Environmental Controls. ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit 1: Proposed Comprehensive Plan Map Exhibit 7: Environmental Determination Exhibit 2: Proposed Zoning Map Exhibit 8: SEPA Checklist Exhibit 3: Vicinity Map Exhibit 9: Notice of Public Hearing Exhibit 4: 2020 Aerial Exhibit 10: Agency Comments Exhibit 5: Existing Comprehensive Plan Map Exhibit 11: Public Comments Exhibit 6: Existing Zoning A. BACKGROUND INFORMATION PROPERTY INFORMATION Size and Characteristics: The property consists of a single parcel totaling .45 acres in size located on the northeast corner of N. Flora Road and E. Montgomery Avenue. The property is adjacent to the Flora Road Centennial Trailhead. Comprehensive Plan: Single Family Residential (SFR) Zoning: Single -Family Residential Suburban (R-2) Existing Land Use: Vacant Page 1 of 6 Staff Report CPA-2022-02 SURROUNDING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, ZONING, AND LAND USES North Comprehensive Plan: Parks, Recreation, and Open Space (P/OS) Zoning: Parks, Recreation, and Open Space (P/OS) Uses: Centennial Trail South Comprehensive Plan: SFR Zoning: Single Family Residential Urban (R-3) Uses: Vacant land East Comprehensive Plan: SFR Zoning: R-2 Uses: Single-family residence West Comprehensive Plan: SFR Zoning: R-2 Uses: Single-family residence SUMMARY AND IMPLICATIONS OF PROPOSED AMENDMENT: If adopted the amendment will add .45 acres to the City's park land. The parcel is expected to provide needed land for a proposed pedestrian bridge associated with the north river loop trail. The parcel will also provide enhanced access to the Centennial Trail at the Flora Road trailhead. APPLICATION PROCESSING: Chapter 17.80 Permit Processing Procedures in the SVMC. The following summarizes key application procedures for the proposal. Application Submitted: October 2, 2021 SEPA Determination of Non -Significance Issue date January 14, 2022 End of Appeal Period for DNS: January 28, 2022 Date of Mailed Notice of Public Hearing February 18, 2022 Date of Published Notice of Public Hearing: February 11 and 18, 2022 B. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO SEPA 1. Findings: Pursuant to Title 21 (Environmental Controls) SVMC, the lead agency has determined that the proposal does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). The City issued a Determination of Non -Significance (DNS) for the proposal on January 14, 2022. The determination was made after review of a completed environmental checklist, the application, Titles 19, 21, and 22 of the SVMC, a site assessment, public and agency comments, the Comprehensive Plan and associated Environmental Impact Statement. 2. Conclusion(s): The procedural requirements of the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) and Title 21 SVMC have been fulfilled. Page 2 of 6 Staff Report CPA-2022-02 C. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT AND AREA -WIDE REZONE i. The City may approve Comprehensive Plan amendments and area -wide zone map amendments if it complies with the approval criteria in SVMC 17.80.140(H). (1) The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to the public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment; Analysis: The proposed amendment to change the designation for .45 acres from SFR to P/OS bears a substantial relationship to the public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment. In 2021, the City purchased the parcel from Spokane County for the river loop trail project and for future access improvements to the Centennial Trail at Flora Rd for the purpose of expanding / increasing access to the City's park lands. This area was generally identified as New Park Area 6 in the 2019 Parks and Recreation Master Plan. These plans were developed through an extensive community engagement process. Additionally, the expansion is necessary to maintain the adopted Level of Service (LOS) 3.25 acres of park land for every 1,000 residents. (2) The proposed amendment is consistent with the requirements of Chapter 36.70A RCW and with the portion of the City's adopted Plan not affected by the amendment; Analysis: The proposed amendment is consistent with the requirements of Chapter 36.70A RCW and with the portion of the City's adopted Plan not affected by the amendment. The Growth Management Act (GMA) adopts fourteen goals to guide the development of local comprehensive plans and development regulations. The proposal is consistent with the GMA goals to enhance recreational opportunities and develop parks and recreation facilities. Additionally, the GMA requires a Parks and Recreation element to be a part of the adopted comprehensive plan. The City's Comprehensive Plan adopts the Parks Plan by reference. (3) The proposed amendment will not have unanticipated impacts on other areas of the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed amendment responds to a substantial change in conditions beyond the property owner's control applicable to the area within which the subject property lies; Analysis: The proposed amendment does not respond to a substantial change in conditions beyond the property owner's control applicable to the area within which the subject property lies. (4) The proposed amendment corrects an obvious mapping error; or Analysis: The amendment is not in response to a mapping error and would not correct any error. The proposed amendment addresses an identified deficiency in the Comprehensive Plan. Analysis: The proposed amendment will address a documented deficiency of park land in the Comprehensive Plan. (5) ii. The City must also consider the following factors prior to approving Comprehensive Plan amendments: Page 3 of 6 Staff Report CPA-2022-02 (6) The effect upon the physical environment; Analysis: The change to P/OS will not impact the physical environment. The change will result in less intensive uses than are currently allowed in SFR reducing the potential effects on the physical environment. (7) (8) (9) The effect on open space, streams, rivers, and lakes; Analysis: According to the City's Critical Area map, the parcel is not impacted by any known critical areas, such as wetlands, fish and wildlife habitat areas, geologically hazardous areas or frequently flooded areas. The parcel is located within shoreline jurisdiction and designated in the Shoreline Master Program as Shoreline Residential Upland. There are no known surface water quality or quantity issues. Chapter 21.40 SVMC and the City's Shoreline Master Program will ensure that adequate protection of the critical areas and adjacent land shorelands are addressed at the time of future development. The compatibility with and impact on adjacent land uses and surrounding neighborhoods; Analysis: The proposed amendment is compatible with the surrounding land uses. Future development of the park space will remedy a documented need and location identified in the 2019 Parks and Recreation Master Plan. The adequacy of and impact on community facilities including utilities, roads, public transportation, parks, recreation, and schools; Analysis: Sewer and water are available to the site. The nearest formal park is Greenacres Park approximately 1.25 miles to the southeast, the Centennial Trail is immediately to the north, and across the Spokane River is the newly acquired Flora Park property. The proposal will increase park land and allow future development to access the newly acquired Flora Park property as part of the north river loop trail proposal. The site is served by Flora Road, an Urban Major Collector. The existing and forecast Level of Service (LOS) for Flora Road at this location is A-C which is within the adopted LOS; Montgomery Ave at this location is a local access street and does not have an adopted LOS. There are no planned capacity or preservation projects planned in this area. (10) The benefit to the neighborhood, City, and region; Analysis: The proposed amendment will provide benefits to the neighborhood and City by providing an opportunity to provide access to planned improvements on the north side of the river. (11) The quantity and location of land planned for the proposed land use type and density and the demand for such land; Analysis: The quantity and location of park land is planned for and needed as identified in the Parks Plan. An access point at this location furthers the goals of the Parks Plan and Comprehensive Plan and would provide easy access for pedestrians and bicycles. (12) The current and projected population density in the area; and Analysis: The proposed change would have minimal impact on projected population density. Page 4 of 6 Staff Report CPA-2022-02 (13) The effect upon other aspects of the Comprehensive Plan. Analysis: The proposal will not have an impact on other aspects of the Comprehensive Plan. In addition to meeting the goals in the Parks and Recreation Master Plan the proposed amendment addresses the following goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan: a. LU-G2 Provide for land uses that are essential to Spokane Valley residents, employees, and visitors. b. LU-P18 Enable public open spaces. c. P-Gl Develop, grow, and maintain a diverse and accessible park, recreation, trail, and open space system that enhances community character. d. P-P5 Design parks and community facilities to provide easy access for pedestrians, bicycles, autos, and public transit. e. P-P8 Plan for access to parks, trails, and other open spaces in all neighborhoods. Conclusion(s): For the reasons outlined above the proposed amendment is consistent with SVMC 17.80.140(H). D. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO PUBLIC COMMENTS 1. Findings: Staff has received no public comments to date. Comments received following the date of this staff report will be provided to the Planning Commission at the March 10, 2022 meeting. 2. Conclusion(s): Notice of Public Hearing (NOPH) was published on February 11 and 18, 2022. The NOPH was posted on site on February 17, 2022 and mailed on February 18, 2022 to residents within an 400 foot radius. E. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO AGENCY COMMENTS 1. Findings: Staff has not received any agency comments of significance to date. Agency Received Comments Comments Dated City of Spokane Valley Senior Traffic Engineer City of Spokane Valley Development Engineering City of Spokane Valley Building & Planning City of Spokane Valley Parks & Recreation Spokane Valley Fire Department City of Millwood City of Liberty Lake City of Spokane City of Spokane Valley Police Department Spokane County, Building and Planning Spokane County, Environmental Services Spokane County, Clean Air Agency Spokane County, Fire District No. 1 Page 5 of 6 Staff Report CPA-2022-02 Spokane County, Fire District No. 8 Spokane County Regional Health District Spokane Regional Clean Air Agency Spokane Aquifer Joint Board Spokane Transit Authority (STA) Spokane Regional Transportation Council (SRTC) Washington State Dept of Commerce Washington State Dept of Ecology (Olympia) Washington State Dept of Ecology (Spokane) Washington State Dept of Fish & Wildlife Washington State Dept of Natural Resources Washington State Dept of Transportation Washington State Parks & Recreation Commission WA Archaeological & Historic Preservation Avista Utilities Inland Power & Light Modern Electric Water Company Central Valley School District #356 East Valley School District #361 West Valley School District #363 Century Link Comcast Model Irrigation District #18 Consolidated Irrigation District #19 East Spokane Water District #1 Vera Water & Power Spokane County Water District #3 Spokane Tribe of Indians 2. Conclusion(s): No concerns are noted. F. CONCLUSION: For the reasons set forth in Section C above, the proposed amendment to amend the Comprehensive Plan and adopt the area -wide rezone to change the land use designation and zoning to of parcel 55073.0458 to P/OS complies with the requirements of the SVMC 17.80.140(H) and the Comprehensive Plan. Page 6 of 6 EXHIBIT 1 Proposed Comprehensive Plan Map Spokane River Parks Centennial E Knox L-n E Indiana Ave File: CPA-2022-02 Owner: Spokane Valley Parcel(s): 55073.0458 Address: 17105 E Montgomery Ave E Mansfield_ Ave E Knox Ave Legend CMU 111111111111111111111111111111 MFR POS MU RC IMU NC SFR �J I I 0 50 100 200 300 400 Feet Request: Proposed change: Comp Plan Map: SFR to P/OS Zoning Map: R-2 to P/OS EXHIBIT 2 Proposed Zoning Map ikd WA State Parks - Centennial Trail Spokane River E Knox-Ln E Indiana Ave ca 0 et Pie E Mansfield Ave Legend Zoning M'R-1 R-2 R-3 R-4 II II II II II II II II II I11 MFR CMU POS RC NC IMU MU 0 50 100 200 300 400 Feet File: CPA-2022-02 Owner: Spokane County (Spokane Valley in process of purchase) Parcel(s): 55073.0458 Address: 17105 E Montgomery Ave Request: Proposed change: Comp Plan Map: SFR to P/OS Zoning Map: R-2 to P/OS EXHIBIT 3 Vicinity E Industrial Park C St E Industrial Park D St E Industrial Park E St 0 0 tO E Marietta Ave E Flora Pit Rd E Euclid Ave Spokane River Eindiana Ave E/9DF4y El 90 Fi,y a) i s 0 E Dalton Ave Z N Flora Rd E Euclid Ave WA State Parks - Centennial Trail E Mansfield E Knox Ave Ave 0 0 EL E Nora Ave c�a 0 a) m z 0 c0 z a) z J • 0 U Z 0 0 z J a) E Montgomery Ave E Knox Ave EShannon Ave E Indiana Ave Ct o ai J 'Cr E Maxwell Ave Greenacres Park E Boone Ave Z a 0 E Desr�ne� 0 E z C Averiv E Boonegve File: CPA-2022-02 Owner: Spokane County (Spokane Valley in process of purchase) Parcel(s): 55073.0458 Address: 17105 E Montgomery Ave Request: Proposed change: Comp Plan Map: SFR to P/OS Zoning Map: R-2 to P/OS EXHIBIT 4 2020 Aerial File: CPA-2022-02 Owner: Spokane County (Spokane Valley in process of purchase) Parcel(s): 55073.0458 Address: 17105 E Montgomery Ave Request: Proposed change: Comp Plan Map: SFR to P/OS Zoning Map: R-2 to P/OS EXHIBIT 5 Exisitng Comprehensive Plan Map E Indiana Ave File: CPA-2022-02 Owner: Spokane County (Spokane Valley in process of purchase) Parcel(s): 55073.0458 Address: 17105 E Montgomery Ave E Mansfield Ave Legend CMU MFR POS MU RC IMU ' NC SFR N �LJ 1 I I 0 50 100 200 300 400 Feet Request: Proposed change: Comp Plan Map: SFR to P/OS Zoning Map: R-2 to P/OS EXHIBIT 6 Existing Zoning Map ikd WA State Parks - Centennial Trail Spokane River E Knox-Ln E Indiana Ave ca 0 et Pie E Mansfield Ave Legend Zoning M'R-1 R-2 R-3 R-4 II II II II II II II II II I11 MFR CMU POS RC NC IMU MU 0 50 100 200 300 400 Feet File: CPA-2022-02 Owner: Spokane County (Spokane Valley in process of purchase) Parcel(s): 55073.0458 Address: 17105 E Montgomery Ave Request: Proposed change: Comp Plan Map: SFR to P/OS Zoning Map: R-2 to P/OS EXHIBIT 7 Spakane 4,000Valley COMMUNITY & PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE 10210 East Sprague Avenue • Spokane Valley WA 99206 509.720.5000 • Fax: 509.720.5075 • planning@spokanevalley.org PROJECT: Annual amendments to the Comprehensive Plan for 2022: File Number Description Location Applicant/Owner CPA-2022-01 A request to change the comprehensive plan designation and zoning for 1.03 acres Single Family Residential (SFR) to Multifamily Residential (MFR). Parcels 45204.1436 and 45204.1435; SE'/ of Section 20, Township 25 North, Range 44 East, Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washington SHFI PROPERTIES, LLC/ Land Use Solutions and Entitlement CPA-2022-02 A request to change land use designation and zoning for 0.45 acres from Single Family Residential to Parks and Open Space. Parcel: 55073.0458; SW'/ of Section 07, Township 25 North, Range 45 East, Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washington Spokane Valley/ Spokane Valley CPA-2022-03 A request to change land use designation and zoning for 17.64 acres from Single Family Residential to Parks and Open Space. Parcels: 44041.0104; 44041.0103; 44041.0102; 44041.9048; 44041.9046; and 44041.9007; NE'/ of Section 04, Township 24 North, Range 44 East, Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washington Spokane Valley/ Spokane Valley CPA-2022-04 A request to amend Figure 27 — Bikeway Network to add north river loop trail. Citywide; Spokane Valley Spokane Valley/ Not applicable LEAD AGENCY: City of Spokane Valley. DETERMINATION: Determination of Non -Significance is issued under Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 197- 11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date issued. Comments must be received by 5:00 p.m. on January 28, 2022. Pursuant to Title 21, Environmental Controls of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC), the lead agency has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement is not required under Revised Code of Washington 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. STAFF CONTACT: Chaz Bates, AICP, Senior Planner, City of Spokane Valley, 10210 East Sprague Avenue, Spokane Valley, WA 99206, PH: (509) 720-5337; cbates rr spokanevallev_.org RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: Mike Basinger, AICP, Economic Development Manager, City of Spokane Valley, 10210 East Sprague Avenue, Spokane Valley, WA 99206, PH: (509) 720-5333, mbasin2er a,spokanevallev.or2 DATE ISSUED: January 14, 2022 SIGNATURE:_A,j APPEAL: An appeal of this determination shall be submitted to the Community & PutiKc Works Department within fourteen (14) calendar days after the date issued. The appeal must be written and specific factual objections made to the City's threshold determination. Appeals shall be conducted in conformance with SVMC 17.90 Appeals, and any required fees pursuant to the City's adopted Fee Schedule shall be paid at the time of appeal submittal. Pursuant to WAC 197-11- 680, appeals shall be limited to a review of a final threshold determination. City of Spokane Valley Determination of Non -Significance (DNS) Page 1 of 1 File Nos. CPA-2022-01; CPA-2022-02; CPA-2022-03; CPA-2022-04 EXHIBIT 8 po ne SEPA CHECKLIST SVMC 21.20 10210 E Sprague Avenue ♦ Spokane Valley WA 99206 Phone: (509) 720-5240 • Fax: (509) 720-5075 • permitcenterJ)spokanevalley.org STAFF USE ONLY Date Submitted: Received by: Fee: Not Applicable_ PLUS #: File #: PART I - REQUIRED MATERIAL **THE APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF THE REQUIRED MATERIALS ARE NOT PROVIDED** ❑ Completed SEPA Checklist ❑ Application Fee ❑ Reduced Site Plan of proposal in 81/2" by 11" or 11" by 17" size ❑ Trip Distribution and Generation Letter, if requested by Development Engineering. PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NON -PROJECT PROPOSALS: Complete this checklist for non -project proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NON -PROJECT ACTIONS (Part D). PL-22 V1.0 Page 1 of 14 Spokane ,000Valley SEPA CHECKLIST For non -project actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: CPA-2022-0002. An amendment to the Future Land Use Map of the 2017-2037 Comprehensive Plan. 2. Name of applicant: City of Spokane Valley 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Chaz Bates, Senior Planner, Economic Development Division, Spokane Valley, WA 99206 4. Date checklist prepared: October 28, 2021 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Spokane Valley 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Anticipated adoption June 2022. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? Yes. If yes, explain. The space will be developed as future access improvement and potential use to support a pedestrian bridge to access recently acquired park property on the north side of the river. Development is planned only and future development will require a separate SEPA process. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) was completed for the City's Comprehensive Plan. The document is titled 2017-2037 Comprehensive Plan Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) and supporting Development Regulations. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? None If yes, explain. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Approval by City Council 11 Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) The amendment is to change approximately 0.45 acres of Single Family Residential (SFR) designated land to Parks, Recreation and Open Space (P/OS). The change would formally recognize the public ownership and intended use of the property. PL-22 V1.0 Page 2 of 14 Spokane 4,000Valley SEPA CHECKLIST 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The proposal is addressed as 17105 E Montgomery, the property is undeveloped The parcel number is 55073.0458 and can be further located using these coordinates 47.677763, -117.17486767. 13. Does the proposed action lie within the Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA)? Yes. The general Sewer Service Area? Yes. Priority Sewer Service Area? No. (See: Spokane County's ASA Overlay zone Atlas for boundaries). 14. The following questions supplement Part A. PL-22 V1.0 a. Critical Aquifer Recharge Area (CARA) / Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA). 1. Describe any systems, other than those designed for the disposal of sanitary waste, installed for the purpose of discharging fluids below the ground surface (includes systems such as those for the disposal of Stormwater or drainage from floor drains). Describe the type of system, the amount of material to be disposed of through the system and the types of material likely to be disposed of (including materials which may enter the system inadvertently through spills or as a result of firefighting activities). This is a non -project action changing the future land use map. Future development would be analyzed under separate SEPA process. 2. Will any chemicals (especially organic solvents or petroleum fuels) be stored in aboveground or underground storage tanks? If so, what types and quantities of material will be stored? This is a non -project action changing the future land use map. Future development would be analyzed under separate SEPA process. 3. What protective measures will be taken to insure that leaks or spills of any chemicals stored or used on site will not be allowed to percolate to groundwater? This includes measures to keep chemicals out of disposal systems. This is a non -project action changing the future land use map. Future development would be analyzed under separate SEPA process. 4. Will any chemicals be stored, handled or used on the site in a location where a spill or leak will drain to surface or groundwater or to a Stormwater disposal system discharging to surface or groundwater? This is a non -project action changing the future land use map. Future development would be analyzed under separate SEPA process. b. Stormwater 1. What are the depths on the site to groundwater and to bedrock (if known)? Page 3 of 14 Spokane .0•00Valley Unknown. SEPA CHECKLIST 2. Will stormwater be discharged into the ground? If so, describe any potential impacts. This is a non -project action changing the future land use map and does not evaluate a specific future use. Any future changes will be reviewed under existing stormwater regulations. B. ENVIRONMENTALELEMENTS 1) Earth a.General description of the site (check one): flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other Future development would be analyzed under separate SEPA process. b.What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 7 percent. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. This is a non -project action changing the future land use map. The site is currently undeveloped and the application does not evaluate a specific future use. Any future changes will be reviewed under a separate SEPA process. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? No. If so, describe. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Also indicate source of fill. Not applicable. c. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? Not applicable. If so, generally describe. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Not applicable. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Not applicable EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY PL-22 V1.0 Page 4 of 14 Spokane 10Valley 2) Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Not applicable. b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that mayaffect your proposal? No. If so, generally describe.. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Not applicable. 3) Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. Yes. The Spokane River is to the north. The Spokane River is a shoreline of the state. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? Not applicable. If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Future development of the site will require review for potential impacts to the shoreline. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. Not applicable. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No. SEPA CHECKLIST EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY PL-22 V1.0 Page 5 of 14 Spokane 10Valley 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? No. If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. Not applicable. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. Not applicable. c. Water runoff (including stormwater): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. The site is currently undeveloped. This is a non -project action changing the future land use map and does not evaluate a specific future use. Any future changes will be reviewed under stormwater regulations in place at time of development. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? Not applicable. If so, generally describe. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: The proposal is a non -project action and does not have a direct effect on the surface, ground or runoff water. SEPA CHECKLIST PL-22 V1.0 Page 6 of 14 Spokane 4,000Valley 4) Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: ❑ deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other ❑ shrubs ❑ grass ❑ pasture ❑ crop or grain ❑ wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other ❑ water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other ❑ other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? None proposed. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: The proposal is a non -project action development of any future development will be analyzed under a separate SEPA. The city has adopted development standards to preserve and enhance vegetation. 5) Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site ❑ birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, ❑ other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, ❑ other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known. c. Is the site part of a migration route? Not applicable. If so, explain. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: The proposal is a non -project action. Future re -development of the site will be analyzed under a separate SEPA. The city has adopted development standards to preserve and enhance fauna. SEPA CHECKLIST EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY PL-22 V1.0 Page 7 of 14 Spokane .0•00Valley 6). Energy and natural resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Not applicable. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. Not applicable. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Not applicable. 7) Environmental health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe: The proposal is a non - project action changing the land use designation from Single Family Residential to Parks, Recreation and Open Space, there are no known environmental health hazards that could occur as a result of this proposal. The development of the park will be analyzed under a separate SEPA. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Not applicable. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: Not applicable. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? The site is within a residential neighborhood and adjacent to the Centennial Trail it's unlikely these noises will affect park use. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Not applicable. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Not applicable. SEPA CHECKLIST EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY PL-22 V1.0 Page 8 of 14 Spokane ,10Valley 8). Land and shoreline use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The site is currently owned by Spokane County and the City of Spokane Valley is in the process of purchasing the land. The right-of-way immediately west of the site is currently used as an access point to the Centennial Trail. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. Not known. c. Describe any structures on the site. There are no structures on the site. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Single Family Residential f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Single Family Residential g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Shoreline Residential Upland h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No, the property is within shoreline jurisdiction though. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? None. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? Not applicable. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: Not applicable. I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: Not applicable. SEPA CHECKLIST EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY PL-22 V1.0 Page 9 of 14 Spokane 10Valley 9) Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Not applicable. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Not applicable. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: Not applicable. 10). Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? Not applicable. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Not applicable. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Not applicable. 11). Light and glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Not applicable. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? Not applicable. c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? Not applicable. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Not applicable. SEPA CHECKLIST EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY PL-22 V1.0 Page 10 of 14 Spokane 4,000Valley 12) Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? The nearest formal park is Greenacres Park approximately 1.25 miles (on the road network) to the southeast, the Centennial Trail is immediately to the north, and across the Spokane River is the newly acquired Flora Park property. The proposal will increase park land and allow future development to access the newly acquired Flora Park property as part of the north river loop trail proposal. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: The city's adopted comprehensive plan adopts a level of service for park space. The city has an adopted Park and Recreation Master Plan that provides strategies meet adopted levels of service for projected growth. This area was generally identified as New Park Area 6 in the 2019 Parks and Recreation Master Plan. 13). Historic and cultural preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. Not applicable. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: Not applicable. 14). Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The site is currently undeveloped. Montgomery Dr and Flora, local access streets provide access to the site. There is no formal park space for the Centennial Trail acces. b. c. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? No. d. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the projecteliminate? Not applicable. SEPA CHECKLIST EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY PL-22 V1.0 Page 11 of 14 Spokane ,000Valley e. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? Not applicable. If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). f. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? Not applicable. If so, generally describe. g. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? Not applicable. If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: The city's adopted comprehensive plan adopts a level of service for transportation services. There are no planned capacity improvements to the transportation network in this area. 15) Public services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No. The city's adopted comprehensive plan adopts a level of service for public services. Future development will be analyzed under a separate SEPA for impacts to those services. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. Not applicable. 16) Utilities a. Check utilities currently available at the site: ❑ electricity, ❑ natural gas, ❑water, ❑ refuse service, ❑ telephone, ❑ sanitary sewer, ❑ septic system, ❑ other - describe. While the site is undeveloped it has access to a variety of utilities including water, sewer, refuse service, and electricity. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Not applicable. SEPA CHECKLIST EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: Chaz Bates Date Submitted: 10/28/2021 PL-22 V1.0 Page 12 of 14 Spokane 4,000Valley SEPA CHECKLIST D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NON -PROJECT ACTIONS (Do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? The proposed amendment is not likely to increase emissions to air, production of noise, and discharge to water. The amendment is within the scope of impacts analyzed in the Final Environmental Impact Statement for the 2017-2037 Comprehensive Plan and supporting development regulations. a. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: Consistent with the FEIS of the 2017-2037 Comprehensive Plan, the city adopted implementing regulations while mitigating impacts to the natural environment including an updated critical areas ordinance. On a planning level the adopted regulatory scheme has been identified as sufficient to avoid and reduce impacts to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise. Site specific impacts will be reviewed and mitigated at the time of development based upon adopted regulations within the Spokane Valley. 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? The proposed amendment anticipated not to have impacts on plants and animals. The amendment is within the scope of impacts analyzed in the Final Environmental Impact Statement for the 2017-2037 Comprehensive Plan and supporting development regulations. a. Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: Consistent with the FEIS of the 2017-2037 Comprehensive Plan, the city adopted implementing regulations while mitigating impacts to the natural environment including an updated critical areas ordinance. On a planning level the adopted regulatory scheme has been identified as sufficient to protect and conserve plants and animals. Site specific impacts will be reviewed and mitigated at the time of development based upon adopted regulations within the Spokane Valley at that time. 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? The proposed amendment anticipated not to have impacts on energy and natural resources. The amendment is within the scope of impacts analyzed in the Final Environmental Impact Statement for the 2017-2037 Comprehensive Plan and supporting development regulations. a. Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: Consistent with the FEIS of the 2017-2037 Comprehensive Plan, the city adopted implementing regulations to protect and conserve energy and natural resources. On a planning level, the adopted regulatory scheme has been identified as sufficient to protect and conserve energy and natural resources. Site specific impacts will be reviewed and mitigated at the time of development based upon adopted regulations within the Spokane Valley at that time. PL-22 V1.0 Page 13 of 14 Spokane .0,00Valley 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? The proposed amendment will not impact environmentally sensitive areas as none exist on the site. SEPA CHECKLIST a. Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: Not applicable. 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? The proposed amendment will not affect any shorelines as none are near or on the site. a. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: Not applicable. 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? The proposed amendment may increase demand on transportation and public services if the site is redeveloped or developed more intensively. The amendment is within the scope of impacts analyzed in the Final Environmental Impact Statement for the 2017-2037 Comprehensive Plan and supporting development regulations. a. Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: The Comprehensive Plan adopts a level -of -service for transportation and public services. The Final Environmental Impact Statement for the 2017-2037 Comprehensive Plan and the 6- year Transportation Improvement Program identifies the necessary projects to maintain the adopted LOS. These transportation and public service projects are implemented both by the city and state and at the project level through concurrency. 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. The proposal does not conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. Any specific issues that may arise during the development of the site will be identified and addressed based upon regulations within the Spokane Valley Municipal Code. E. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, swear under penalty of perjury that the above responses are made truthfully and to the best of my knowledge. I also understand that, should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part, the agency may withdraw any Determination of Nonsignificance that it might issue in reliance upon this check list. Date: 10/28/2021 Signature: Chaz Bates Please print or type: Proponent: City of Spokane Valley Address: 10210 East Sprague Avenue; Spokane Valley, WA 99206 PL-22 V1.0 Page 14 of 14 Spokane Valley Phone: (509) 720-5000 SEPA CHECKLIST Person completing form (if different from proponent): Name: Chaz Bates, Senior Planner, City of Spokane Valley Economic Development Division Address: 10210 E Sprague Ave Spokane Valley, WA 99206 Phone: 509-720-5337 PL-22 V1.0 Page 15 of 14 EXHIBIT 9 Notice of Virtual Public Hearing City of Spokane Valley 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Due to the restrictions on public gatherings arising from the covid-19 outbreak, and pursuant to Govemor Inslee's Stay Home, Stay Healthy Proclamation (No. 20-25) and Proclamation 20-28 (and associated extensions), this hearing will be conducted remotely using web and telephone conference tools, as described below. HEARING DATE AND TIME: March 10, 2022, beginning at 6:00 p.m. ZOOM MEETING DETAILS: Join Zoom Meeting A link to the Zoom meeting will be provided on the agenda and posted to the Planning Commission webpage: www.spokanevalley.org/planningcommission. HEARING BODY: Spokane Valley Planning Commission The Planning Commission will hold a public hearing to receive public comment on the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment requests and make a recommendation to the City Council on each of the following applications: FILE No. CPA-2022-01: A request to change the comprehensive plan designation and zoning for 1.03 acres Single Family Residential (SFR) to Multifamily Residential (MFR) for parcels 45204.1436 and 45204.1435; SE 1/4 of Section 20, Township 25 North, Range 44 East, Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washington FILE No. CPA-2022-02: A request to change land use designation and zoning for 0.45 acres from Single Family Residential (SFR) to Parks and Open Space (POS) for parcel: 55073.0458; SW 1/4 of Section 07, Township 25 North, Range 45 East, Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washington FILE No. CPA-2022-03 A request to change land use designation and zoning for 17.64 acres from Single Family Residential (SFR) to Parks and Open Space (POS) for parcels: 44041.0104; 44041.0103; 44041.0102; 44041.9048; 44041.9046; and 44041.9007; NE 1/4 of Section 04, Township 24 North, Range 44 East, Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washington FILE No. CPA-2022-04: A request to amend Figure 27 — Bikeway Network to add north river loop trail. STAFF CONTACT: Chaz Bates, AICP, Senior Planner; (509) 720-5337 cbates@spokanevalley.org ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: The City issued a Determination of Non -significance (DNS) on January 14, 2022 pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) and chapter 21.20 Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC). HEARING PROCEDURES: The Planning Commission will conduct the remote hearing pursuant to the rules of procedure adopted in SVMC Title 18 (Boards and Authorities). The public is encouraged to submit written comments prior to the hearing by sending the comments to Chaz Bates, 10210 E Sprague Ave, Spokane Valley, WA 99206, or email to cbates@spokanevalley.org. You may also hand deliver your comments to City Hall. All comments will need to be received by 4:00 PM on March 9, 2022, for them to be prepared for submission into the record. Comments received will be entered into the record at the time of the public participation portion of the Public Hearing. All interested persons may testify at the remote public hearing via the zoom meeting address and/or phone number. Interested persons will need to sign up to speak no later than 4:00 p.m. on March 10, 2022. Please visit the Planning Commission webpage (see link above) to sign up for oral public comments. This is not an opportunity for questions or discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes per person. Written comments and documents may only be submitted prior to the hearing. Any appeal of the Planning Commission's decision will be based on the record established before the Planning Commission, pursuant to SVMC 17.90 (Appeals). The Planning Commission will forward a recommendation on the request to the Spokane Valley City Council. STAFF REPORT AND INSPECTION OF FILE: A staff report will be available for inspection seven (7) calendar days before the hearing. The staff report and application file may be inspected by visiting the Comprehensive Plan webpage at www.spokanevalley.org/CP. If you have any questions, please contact Chaz Bates, Senior Planner, Economic Development Division, at cbates@spokanevalley.org. Carrie Koudelka, CMC Spokane Valley Deputy City Clerk Publish: February 11, 2022 and February 18, 2022 EXHIBIT 10 STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY 4601 N Monroe Street • Spokane, Washington 99205-1295 • (509)329-3400 January 27, 2022 Chaz Bates, AICP Senior Planner City of Spokane Valley 10210 East Sprague Avenue Spokane Valley, WA 99206 Re: 2022 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment File: CPA-2022-01, 02, 03, and 04 Dear Chaz Bates: Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the Determination of Nonsignificance regarding the 2022 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment (Proponent: City of Spokane Valley and Land Use Solutions). After reviewing the documents, the Department of Ecology (Ecology) submits the following comments: Water Quality Program -Shannon Adams (509) 329-3610 The four SEPA Checklists for the four Comprehensive Plan Amendments appear to be "non -project actions" related to zone changes. Please keep in mind that future soil disturbances at the individual sites may require separate SEPA review. If any of these future projects disturb over one acre of soil and discharge off site, they may also require a Construction Stormwater General Permit. For more information in obtaining a Construction Stormwater General Permit, or for other technical assistance, please contact Shannon Adams at (509) 329-3610 or via email at Shannon.Adams@ecy.wa.gov. State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA)-Cindy Anderson (509) 329-3442 Ecology bases comments upon information submitted for review. As such, comments made do not constitute an exhaustive list of the various authorizations you may need to obtain, nor legal requirements you may need to fulfill in order to carry out the proposed action. Applicants should remain in touch with their Local Responsible Officials or Planners for additional guidance. For information on the SEPA Process, please contact Cindy Anderson at (509) 329-3442 or via email at Cindy.Anderson@ecy.wa.gov. Chaz Bates January 27, 2022 Page 2 To receive more guidance on or to respond to the comments made by Ecology, please contact the appropriate staff listed above at the phone number or email provided. Department of Ecology Eastern Regional Office (Ecology File: 202200232) cc: Dwight Hume, Land Use Solutions EXHIBIT 11 Public Comments (Inserted as received) Siokane Walley COMMUNITY & PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT BUILDING & PLANNING DIVISION STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION CPA-2022-03 STAFF REPORT DATE: February 16, 2022 HEARING DATE AND LOCATION: March 3, 2022, beginning at 6:00 p.m., remotely via Zoom. Project Number: CPA-2022-03 Application Description: A request to change land use designation and zoning for 17.64 acres from Single Family Residential to Parks and Open Space. Location: 44041.0104; 44041.0103; 44041.0102; 44041.9048; 44041.9046; and 44041.9007; NE 1/4 of Section 04, Township 24 North, Range 44 East, Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washington Applicant: City of Spokane Valley, 10210 E Sprague, Spokane Valley, WA 99206 Owners: City of Spokane Vaelly Date of Application: November 1, 2021 Staff Contact: Chaz Bates, Senior Planner, 10210 E Sprague Avenue, Spokane Valley, WA 99206 APPROVAL CRITERIA: Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan, Title 17 Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) General Provisions, Title 19 SVMC Zoning Regulations, and Title 21 SVMC Environmental Controls. ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit 1: Proposed Comprehensive Plan Map Exhibit 7: Environmental Determination Exhibit 2: Proposed Zoning Map Exhibit 8: SEPA Checklist Exhibit 3: Vicinity Map Exhibit 9: Notice of Public Hearing Exhibit 4: 2020 Aerial Exhibit 10: Agency Comments Exhibit 5: Existing Comprehensive Plan Map Exhibit 11: Public Comments Exhibit 6: Existing Zoning A. BACKGROUND INFORMATION PROPERTY INFORMATION Size and Characteristics: The property consists of six parcels totaling 17.64 acres. The property is located on the southeast corner of E. 44th Avenue and S. Bates Road and extends to the Union Pacific railroad. Comprehensive Plan: Single Family Residential (SFR) Zoning: Single -Family Residential Suburban (R-2) Existing Land Use: Vacant Page 1 of 6 Staff Report CPA-2022-03 SURROUNDING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, ZONING, AND LAND USES North Comprehensive Plan: SFR Zoning: R-2 and Single Family Residential Urban (R-3) Uses: Vacant South Comprehensive Plan: SFR Zoning: R-2 Uses: Single-family residences East Comprehensive Plan: Right-of-way (ROW), County Low Density Residential (LDR) Zoning: ROW, County LDR Uses: Single-family residence and vacant land West Comprehensive Plan: SFR Zoning: R-2 Uses: Fire Station and single family residences SUMMARY AND IMPLICATIONS OF PROPOSED AMENDMENT: If adopted the amendment will add 17.64 acres to the City's park land. A portion of the property is expected to be used for a new Fire District 8 fire station. The portion of the parcels are expected to provide needed park land for a documented need identified in the City's Park and Recreation Master Plan. APPLICATION PROCESSING: Chapter 17.80 Permit Processing Procedures in the SVMC. The following summarizes key application procedures for the proposal. Application Submitted: October 2, 2021 SEPA Determination of Non -Significance Issue date January 14, 2022 End of Appeal Period for DNS: January 28, 2022 Date of Mailed Notice of Public Hearing February 18, 2022 Date of Published Notice of Public Hearing: February 11 and 18, 2022 B. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO SEPA 1. Findings: Pursuant to Title 21 (Environmental Controls) SVMC, the lead agency has determined that the proposal does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). The City issued a Determination of Non -Significance (DNS) for the proposal on January 14, 2022. The determination was made after review of a completed environmental checklist, the application, Titles 19, 21, and 22 of the SVMC, a site assessment, public and agency comments, the Comprehensive Plan and associated Environmental Impact Statement. 2. Conclusion(s): The procedural requirements of the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) and Title 21 SVMC have been fulfilled. C. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT AND REZONE i. The City may approve Comprehensive Plan amendments and area -wide zone map amendments if it complies with the approval criteria in SVMC 17.80.140(H). Page 2 of 6 Staff Report CPA-2022-03 (1) The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to the public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment; Analysis: The proposed amendment to change the designation for 17.64 acres from SFR to P/OS bears a substantial relationship to the public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment. In 2021, the City purchased six parcels southeast of the intersection of 44`h Avenue and Bates Road for the purpose of expanding the City's park lands. This area was generally identified as New Park Area 3 in the 2019 Parks and Recreation Master Plan, which was developed through an extensive community engagement process. Additionally, the expansion is necessary to maintain the adopted Level of Service (LOS) 3.25 acres of park land for every 1,000 residents. (2) The proposed amendment is consistent with the requirements of Chapter 36.70A RCW and with the portion of the City's adopted Plan not affected by the amendment; Analysis: The proposed amendment is consistent with the requirements of Chapter 36.70A RCW and with the portion of the City's adopted Plan not affected by the amendment. The Growth Management Act (GMA) adopts fourteen goals to guide the development of local comprehensive plans and development regulations. The proposal is consistent with the GMA goals to enhance recreational opportunities and develop parks and recreation facilities. Additionally, the GMA requires a Parks and Recreation element to be a part of the adopted comprehensive plan. The City's Comprehensive Plan adopts the Parks Plan by reference. The proposed amendment will not have unanticipated impacts on other areas of the Comprehensive Plan. (3) The proposed amendment responds to a substantial change in conditions beyond the property owner's control applicable to the area within which the subject property lies; Analysis: The proposed amendment does not respond to a substantial change in conditions beyond the property owner's control applicable to the area within which the subject property lies. (4) The proposed amendment corrects an obvious mapping error; or Analysis: The amendment is not in response to a mapping error. (5) The proposed amendment addresses an identified deficiency in the Comprehensive Plan. Analysis: The proposed amendment will address a documented deficiency of park land in the Comprehensive Plan. ii. The City must also consider the following factors prior to approving Comprehensive Plan amendments: (6) The effect upon the physical environment; Analysis: The change to P/OS will not impact the physical environment. The change will result in less intensive uses than are currently allowed in SFR reducing the potential effects on the physical environment. (7) The effect on open space, streams, rivers, and lakes; Page 3 of 6 Staff Report CPA-2022-03 (8) (9) Analysis: According to the City's Critical Area map, the eastern parcels are within a Geological Hazardous area identified as Quanternary Alluvium, development of the site may require additional report or studies. There are no known other critical areas associated with the site, such as wetlands, fish and wildlife habitat areas, or frequently flooded areas. The parcels are not located within shoreline jurisdiction, and there are no known surface water quality or quantity issues. Chapter 21.40 SVMC will ensure that adequate protection of the critical areas and adjacent land use are addressed at the time of future development. The compatibility with and impact on adjacent land uses and surrounding neighborhoods; Analysis: The proposed amendment is compatible with the surrounding land uses. Future development of the park space will provide a documented need and location identified in the 2019 Parks and Recreation Master Plan. The adequacy of and impact on community facilities including utilities, roads, public transportation, parks, recreation, and schools; Analysis: Sewer and water are available to the site. The nearest formal park is Castle Park approximately 2 miles to the north, the Glenrose Unit of Dishman Hills is approximately 1.5 miles to west. The proposal will increase park land and future development will enhance the park system helping maintain the adopted LOS. (10) The benefit to the neighborhood, City, and region; Analysis: The proposed amendment will provide benefits to the neighborhood and City by providing an opportunity to provide park space to the neighborhood. The expansion of park space in this area will help the City meet its adopted LOS for park land. (11) The quantity and location of land planned for the proposed land use type and density and the demand for such land; Analysis: The quantity and location of park land is planned for and needed as identified in the Parks Plan. A neighborhood park at this location furthers the goals of the Parks Plan and Comprehensive Plan. The site provides easy access for pedestrians, bicycles, and automobiles (12) The current and projected population density in the area; and Analysis: The proposed change would have minimal impact on projected population density. (13) The effect upon other aspects of the Comprehensive Plan. Analysis: The proposal will not have an impact on other aspects of the Comprehensive Plan. In addition to meeting the goals in the Parks and Recreation Master Plan the proposed amendment addresses the following goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan: LU-G2 Provide for land uses that are essential to Spokane Valley residents, employees, and visitors. LU-P18 Enable public open spaces. Page 4 of 6 Staff Report CPA-2022-03 P-Gl Develop, grow, and maintain a diverse and accessible park, recreation, trail, and open space system that enhances community character. P-P5 Design parks and community facilities to provide easy access for pedestrians, bicycles, autos, and public transit. P-P8 Plan for access to parks, trails, and other open spaces in all neighborhoods. Conclusion(s): For the reasons outlined above the proposed amendment is consistent with SVMC 17.80.140(H). D. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO PUBLIC COMMENTS 1. Findings: Staff has received no public comments to date. Comments received following the date of this staff report will be provided to the Planning Commission at the March 10, 2022 meeting. 2. Conclusion(s): Notice of Public Hearing (NOPH) was published on February 11 and 18, 2022. The NOPH was posted on site on February 17, 2022 and mailed on February 18, 2022 to residents within an 400 foot radius. E. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO AGENCY COMMENTS 1. Findings: Staff has not received any agency comments of significance to date. Agency Received Comments Comments Dated City of Spokane Valley Senior Traffic Engineer City of Spokane Valley Development Engineering City of Spokane Valley Building & Planning City of Spokane Valley Parks & Recreation Spokane Valley Fire Department City of Millwood City of Liberty Lake City of Spokane City of Spokane Valley Police Department Spokane County, Building and Planning Spokane County, Environmental Services Spokane County, Clean Air Agency Spokane County, Fire District No. 1 Spokane County, Fire District No. 8 Spokane County Regional Health District Spokane Regional Clean Air Agency Spokane Aquifer Joint Board Spokane Transit Authority (STA) Spokane Regional Transportation Council (SRTC) Washington State Dept of Commerce Washington State Dept of Ecology (Olympia) Washington State Dept of Ecology (Spokane) Page 5 of 6 Staff Report CPA-2022-03 Washington State Dept of Fish & Wildlife Washington State Dept of Natural Resources Washington State Dept of Transportation Washington State Parks & Recreation Commission WA Archaeological & Historic Preservation Avista Utilities Inland Power & Light Modern Electric Water Company Central Valley School District #356 East Valley School District #361 West Valley School District #363 Century Link Comcast Model Irrigation District #18 Consolidated Irrigation District #19 East Spokane Water District #1 Vera Water & Power Spokane County Water District #3 Spokane Tribe of Indians 2. Conclusion(s): No concerns are noted. F. CONCLUSION: For the reasons set forth in Section C above, the proposed amendment to amend the Comprehensive Plan and adopt the area -wide rezone to change the land use designation and zoning to of parcels 44041.0104; 44041.0103; 44041.0102; 44041.9048; 44041.9046; and 44041.9007 to P/OS complies with the requirements of SVMC 17.80.140(H) and the Comprehensive Plan. Page 6 of 6 EXHIBIT 1 Proposed Comprehensive Plan Map E 44th Ave E 47th Ave Ei 46th Ave S Bates Rd .E 47th Ct ct s co E Thorpe Rd Legend CMU 11111111 MFR POS MU RC IMU ' NC SFR rLJ 1 I I 0 50 100 200 300 400 Feet File: CPA-2022-03 Owner: Spokane Valley, 10210 E Sprague Parcel(s): 44041.0104, 44041.0103, 44041.0102, 44041.9048, 44041.9046, 44041.9007 Address: Unaddressed Request: Comp Plan Map: SFR to POS Zoning Map: R-2 to POS EXHIBIT 2 Proposed Zoning Map E 44th Ave E 47th Ave Ei 46th Ave S Bates Rd .E 47th Ct CI E Thorpe Rd Legend Zoning MI R-1 R-2 R-3 R-4 MFR CMU POS RC NC - IMU MU rLJ 1 I I 0 50 100 200 300 400 Feet File: CPA-2022-03 Owner: Spokane Valley, 10210 E Sprague Parcel(s): 44041.0104, 44041.0103, 44041.0102, 44041.9048, 44041.9046, 44041.9007 Address: Unaddressed Request: Comp Plan Map: SFR to POS Zoning Map: R-2 to POS EXHIBIT 3 Vicinity S University Rd Q)� E Ea E 38th 38th Ave Ave E 40th F4o�sh /220 ///;c aa0 ° a r. FSun4.4 aown Dr a) LL 0 42na Ct ,a 37th Ave co m o moo. o4 F3 nth Ct E 38th Ave tz _ FAO -CS V �h Ave Ave 0 m E 44th Ave E 46th Ave co L N co Ferret Dr E Van Mailer Ct E45th v N Ave a) cn oco a h cc) 0E � a E47th N o> teP47h C, � P13 _ i°E 48th Ave E A:St' 4., m g,Dr Fe � GIE soth � iQ` E cmEQo j c)tz � Rimrock E Honeycomb e��r Ln Springs Ln F t7eDr Skefe ,fin 1 S Eagle\;(‘ _E4.OthAve S Madison Rd E Chester E Thorpe -Rd —Ridge Ln E37th1 Ln `a. E Dickens Ln EAunnic Ln Sc) 0 0 E K►oWa w - a) co Apache (:)1�s Pawnee Ln File: CPA-2022-03 Owner: Spokane Valley, 10210 E Sprague Parcel(s): 44041.0104, 44041.0103, 44041.0102, 44041.9048, 44041.9046, 44041.9007 Address: Unaddressed Request: Comp Plan Map: SFR to POS Zoning Map: R-2 to POS EXHIBIT 4 2020 Aerial File: CPA-2022-03 Owner: Spokane Valley, 10210 E Sprague Parcel(s): 44041.0104, 44041.0103, 44041.0102, 44041.9048, 44041.9046, 44041.9007 Address: Unaddressed Request: Comp Plan Map: SFR to POS Zoning Map: R-2 to POS EXHIBIT 5 Exisitng Comprehensive Plan Map 1E/ 46th e S Bates Rd 47th Ct 111 E 44th Ave E 47th Ave cc s ii E Thorpe Rd Legend C M U 111 IMU MFR POS MU RC NC SFR N �LJ 1 I I 0 50 100 200 300 400 Feet File: CPA-2022-03 Owner: Spokane Valley, 10210 E Sprague Parcel(s): 44041.0104, 44041.0103, 44041.0102, 44041.9048, 44041.9046, 44041.9007 Address: Unaddressed Request: Comp Plan Map: SFR to POS Zoning Map: R-2 to POS EXHIBIT 6 Existing Zoning Map E 44th Ave E 47th Ave Ei 46th Ave S Bates Rd .E 47th Ct ct s cn Legend Zoning M'R-1 R-2 R-3 R-4 IVl E Thorpe Rd MFR CMU POS RC NC IMU MU rLJ 1 I I 0 50 100 200 300 400 Feet File: CPA-2022-03 Owner: Spokane Valley, 10210 E Sprague Parcel(s): 44041.0104, 44041.0103, 44041.0102, 44041.9048, 44041.9046, 44041.9007 Address: Unaddressed Request: Comp Plan Map: SFR to POS Zoning Map: R-2 to POS EXHIBIT 7 Spakane 4,000Valley COMMUNITY & PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE 10210 East Sprague Avenue • Spokane Valley WA 99206 509.720.5000 • Fax: 509.720.5075 • planning@spokanevalley.org PROJECT: Annual amendments to the Comprehensive Plan for 2022: File Number Description Location Applicant/Owner CPA-2022-01 A request to change the comprehensive plan designation and zoning for 1.03 acres Single Family Residential (SFR) to Multifamily Residential (MFR). Parcels 45204.1436 and 45204.1435; SE'/ of Section 20, Township 25 North, Range 44 East, Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washington SHFI PROPERTIES, LLC/ Land Use Solutions and Entitlement CPA-2022-02 A request to change land use designation and zoning for 0.45 acres from Single Family Residential to Parks and Open Space. Parcel: 55073.0458; SW'/ of Section 07, Township 25 North, Range 45 East, Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washington Spokane Valley/ Spokane Valley CPA-2022-03 A request to change land use designation and zoning for 17.64 acres from Single Family Residential to Parks and Open Space. Parcels: 44041.0104; 44041.0103; 44041.0102; 44041.9048; 44041.9046; and 44041.9007; NE'/ of Section 04, Township 24 North, Range 44 East, Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washington Spokane Valley/ Spokane Valley CPA-2022-04 A request to amend Figure 27 — Bikeway Network to add north river loop trail. Citywide; Spokane Valley Spokane Valley/ Not applicable LEAD AGENCY: City of Spokane Valley. DETERMINATION: Determination of Non -Significance is issued under Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 197- 11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date issued. Comments must be received by 5:00 p.m. on January 28, 2022. Pursuant to Title 21, Environmental Controls of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC), the lead agency has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement is not required under Revised Code of Washington 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. STAFF CONTACT: Chaz Bates, AICP, Senior Planner, City of Spokane Valley, 10210 East Sprague Avenue, Spokane Valley, WA 99206, PH: (509) 720-5337; cbates rr spokanevallev_.org RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: Mike Basinger, AICP, Economic Development Manager, City of Spokane Valley, 10210 East Sprague Avenue, Spokane Valley, WA 99206, PH: (509) 720-5333, mbasin2er a,spokanevallev.or2 DATE ISSUED: January 14, 2022 SIGNATURE:_A,j APPEAL: An appeal of this determination shall be submitted to the Community & PutiKc Works Department within fourteen (14) calendar days after the date issued. The appeal must be written and specific factual objections made to the City's threshold determination. Appeals shall be conducted in conformance with SVMC 17.90 Appeals, and any required fees pursuant to the City's adopted Fee Schedule shall be paid at the time of appeal submittal. Pursuant to WAC 197-11- 680, appeals shall be limited to a review of a final threshold determination. City of Spokane Valley Determination of Non -Significance (DNS) Page 1 of 1 File Nos. CPA-2022-01; CPA-2022-02; CPA-2022-03; CPA-2022-04 EXHIBIT 8 Spokane Walley SEPA CHECKLIST SVMC 21.20 10210 E Sprague Avenue ♦ Spokane Valley WA 99206 Phone: (509) 720-5240 • Fax: (509) 720-5075 • permitcenterJ)spokanevalley.org STAFF USE ONLY Date Submitted: October 30, 2021 Received by: Fee: Not Applicable_ PLUS #: File #: CPA-2021-0002 PART I - REQUIRED MATERIAL **THE APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF THE REQUIRED MATERIALS ARE NOT PROVIDED** ❑ Completed SEPA Checklist ❑ Application Fee ❑ Reduced Site Plan of proposal in 81/2" by 11" or 11" by 17" size ❑ Trip Distribution and Generation Letter, if requested by Development Engineering. PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21 C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NON -PROJECT PROPOSALS: Complete this checklist for non -project proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NON -PROJECT ACTIONS (Part D). PL-22 V1.0 Page 1 of 14 Spokane �Val1ey SEPA CHECKLIST For non -project actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: CPA-2022-03. An amendment to the Future Land Use Map of the 2017-2037 Comprehensive Plan. 2. Name of applicant: City of Spokane Valley 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Chaz Bates, Senior Planner, Economic Development Division, Spokane Valley, WA 99206 4. Date checklist prepared: October 27, 2021 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Spokane Valley 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Anticipated adoption June 2022. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? Yes. If yes, explain. The space will be developed in the future as a park space. Development is planned only, future development may require a separate SEPA process. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) was completed for the City's Comprehensive Plan. The document is titled 2017-2037 Comprehensive Plan Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) and supporting Development Regulations. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? None If yes, explain. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Approval by City Council 11 Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) The amendment is to change approximately 17 acres of Single Family Residential (SFR) designated land to Parks, Recreation and Open Space (P/OS). The change would formally recognize the public ownership and intended use of the property. PL-22 V1.0 Page 2 of 14 Spokane �Val1ey SEPA CHECKLIST 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The proposal is generally located south of 44th Ave, east of Bates Rd, north of 47th Ave, and west of Dishman Mica Rd. The property is vacant and unaddressed. The parcel numbers are 44041.0104, 44041.0104, 44041.0102, 44041.9007, 44041.9046, and 44041.9048 and can be further located using these coordinates 47.612990,-117.248544. 13. Does the proposed action lie within the Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA)? Yes. The general Sewer Service Area? Yes. Priority Sewer Service Area? No. (See: Spokane County's ASA Overlay zone Atlas for boundaries). 14. The following questions supplement Part A. a. Critical Aquifer Recharge Area (CARA) / Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA). 1. Describe any systems, other than those designed for the disposal of sanitary waste, installed for the purpose of discharging fluids below the ground surface (includes systems such as those for the disposal of Stormwater or drainage from floor drains). Describe the type of system, the amount of material to be disposed of through the system and the types of material likely to be disposed of (including materials which may enter the system inadvertently through spills or as a result of firefighting activities). This is a non -project action changing the future land use map. Future development would be analyzed under separate SEPA process. 2. Will any chemicals (especially organic solvents or petroleum fuels) be stored in aboveground or underground storage tanks? If so, what types and quantities of material will be stored? This is a non -project action changing the future land use map. Future development would be analyzed under separate SEPA process. 3. What protective measures will be taken to insure that leaks or spills of any chemicals stored or used on site will not be allowed to percolate to groundwater? This includes measures to keep chemicals out of disposal systems. This is a non -project action changing the future land use map. Future development would be analyzed under separate SEPA process. 4. Will any chemicals be stored, handled or used on the site in a location where a spill or leak will drain to surface or groundwater or to a Stormwater disposal system discharging to surface or groundwater? This is a non -project action changing the future land use map. Future development would be analyzed under separate SEPA process. b. Stormwater PL-22 V1.0 Page 3 of 14 Spokane ��Val1ey SEPA CHECKLIST 1. What are the depths on the site to groundwater and to bedrock (if known)? Unknown. 2. Will stormwater be discharged into the ground? If so, describe any potential impacts. This is a non -project action changing the future land use map and does not evaluate a specific future use. Any future changes will be reviewed under existing stormwater regulations. B. ENVIRONMENTALELEMENTS 1) Earth a.General description of the site (check one): flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other Future development would be analyzed under separate SEPA process. b.What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percentslope)? 5 percent. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. This is a non -project action changing the future land use map. The site is currently undeveloped and the application does not evaluate a specific future use. Any future changes will be reviewed under a separate SEPA process. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? No. If so, describe. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Also indicate source of fill. Not applicable. c. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? Not applicable. If so, generally describe. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Not applicable. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Not applicable EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY PL-22 V1.0 Page 4 of 14 Spokane ��Val1ey 2) Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Not applicable. b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that mayaffect your proposal? Yes. If so, generally describe. The site is access via local access streets (44th Ave and Bates Rd), Dishman Mica is to the east across Union Pacific Railroad, Dishman Mica at this location has approximately 3,600 average daily trips. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Not applicable. 3) Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. No. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? Not applicable. If yes, please describe and attach available plans. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. Not applicable. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No. SEPA CHECKLIST EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY PL-22 V1.0 Page 5 of 14 Spokane ��Val1ey 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? No. If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. Not applicable. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. Not applicable. c. Water runoff (including stormwater): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. The site is currently undeveloped. This is a non -project action changing the future land use map and does not evaluate a specific future use. Any future changes will be reviewed under stormwater regulations in place at time of development. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? Not applicable. If so, generally describe. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: The proposal is a non -project action and does not have a direct effect on the surface, ground or runoff water. SEPA CHECKLIST PL-22 V1.0 Page 6 of 14 Spokane ��Val1ey 4) Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: ❑ deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other ❑ shrubs ❑ grass ❑ pasture ❑ crop or grain ❑ wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other ❑ water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other ❑ other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? None proposed. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: The proposal is a non -project action development of any future development will be analyzed under a separate SEPA. The city has adopted development standards to preserve and enhance vegetation. 5) Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site ❑ birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, ❑ other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, ❑ other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or site. None known. near the c. Is the site part of a migration route? Not applicable. If so, explain. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: The proposal is a non -project action. Future re -development of the site will be analyzed under a separate SEPA. The city has adopted development standards to preserve and enhance fauna. SEPA CHECKLIST EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY PL-22 V1.0 Page 7 of 14 Spokane ��Val1ey 6). Energy and natural resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Not applicable. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. Not applicable. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Not applicable. 7) Environmental health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe: The proposal is a non - project action changing the land use designation from Single Family Residential to Parks, Recreation and Open Space, there are no known environmental health hazards that could occur as a result of this proposal. The development of the park will be analyzed under a separate SEPA. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Not applicable. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: Not applicable. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? The site is within a residential neighborhood and adjacent to railroad tracks it is unlikely these noises will affect park use. Future development may account for these noises in design. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Not applicable. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Not applicable. SEPA CHECKLIST EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY PL-22 V1.0 Page 8 of 14 Spokane ��Val1ey 8). Land and shoreline use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The site is currently owned by the City of Spokane Valley and is unused formally. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. Not known. c. Describe any structures on the site. There are no structures on the site. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Single Family Residential f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Single Family Residential g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Not applicable. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. The northeast portion of the site is identified as Geologically Hazardous further identified as Quaternary Alluvium. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? None. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? Not applicable. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: Not applicable. I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: Not applicable. SEPA CHECKLIST EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY PL-22 V1.0 Page 9 of 14 Spokane ��Val1ey 9) Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Not applicable. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Not applicable. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: Not applicable. 10). Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? Not applicable. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Not applicable. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Not applicable. 11). Light and glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Not applicable. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? Not applicable. c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? Not applicable. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Not applicable. SEPA CHECKLIST EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY PL-22 V1.0 Page 10 of 14 Spokane ��Val1ey 12) Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? The nearest formal park is Castle Park approximately 2 miles (on the road network) to the north, the Glenrose Unit of Dishman Hills is approximately 1.5 miles to west. There are no park facilities at Castle Park or Glenrose Unit of the Dishman Hills b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: The city's adopted comprehensive plan adopts a level of service for park space. The city has an adopted Park and Recreation Master Plan that provides strategies meet adopted levels of service for projected growth. A park in this neighborhood was identified in the Park and Recreation Master Plan as New Park Area 3. 13). Historic and cultural preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. Not applicable. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: Not applicable. 14). Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The site is currently undeveloped. There are some informal access points on 44th Ave and another at the end of Sands Rd to the south. b. c. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? No. d. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? Not applicable. SEPA CHECKLIST EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY PL-22 V1.0 Page 11 of 14 Spokane �Val1ey e. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? Not applicable. If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). While the land use change does not require improvement, future site development will improve access to the new park space. f. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? Not applicable. If so, generally describe. g. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? Not applicable. If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: The city's adopted comprehensive plan adopts a level of service for transportation services. There are no planned capacity improvements to the transportation network in this area. 15) Public services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No. The city's adopted comprehensive plan adopts a level of service for public services. Future development will be analyzed under a separate SEPA for impacts to those services. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. Not applicable. 16) Utilities a. Check utilities currently available at the site: ❑ electricity, ❑ natural gas, ❑water, ❑ refuse service, ❑ telephone, ❑ sanitary sewer, ❑ septic system, ❑ other - describe. While the site is undeveloped it has access to a variety of utilities including water, sewer, refuse service, and electricity. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Not applicable. SEPA CHECKLIST EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: Chaz Bates Date Submitted: 10/27/2021 PL-22 V1.0 Page 12 of 14 Spokane �� Valley SEPA CHECKLIST D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NON -PROJECT ACTIONS (Do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? The proposed amendment is not likely to increase emissions to air, production of noise, and discharge to water. The amendment is within the scope of impacts analyzed in the Final Environmental Impact Statement for the 2017-2037 Comprehensive Plan and supporting development regulations. a. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: Consistent with the FEIS of the 2017-2037 Comprehensive Plan, the city adopted implementing regulations while mitigating impacts to the natural environment including an updated critical areas ordinance. On a planning level the adopted regulatory scheme has been identified as sufficient to avoid and reduce impacts to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise. Site specific impacts will be reviewed and mitigated at the time of development based upon adopted regulations within the Spokane Valley. 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? The proposed amendment anticipated not to have impacts on plants and animals. The amendment is within the scope of impacts analyzed in the Final Environmental Impact Statement for the 2017-2037 Comprehensive Plan and supporting development regulations. a. Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: Consistent with the FEIS of the 2017-2037 Comprehensive Plan, the city adopted implementing regulations while mitigating impacts to the natural environment including an updated critical areas ordinance. On a planning level the adopted regulatory scheme has been identified as sufficient to protect and conserve plants and animals. Site specific impacts will be reviewed and mitigated at the time of development based upon adopted regulations within the Spokane Valley at that time. 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? The proposed amendment anticipated not to have impacts on energy and natural resources. The amendment is within the scope of impacts analyzed in the Final Environmental Impact Statement for the 2017-2037 Comprehensive Plan and supporting development regulations. a. Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: Consistent with the FEIS of the 2017-2037 Comprehensive Plan, the city adopted implementing regulations to protect and conserve energy and natural resources. On a planning level, the adopted regulatory scheme has been identified as sufficient to protect and conserve energy and natural resources. Site specific impacts will be reviewed and mitigated at the time of development based upon adopted regulations within the Spokane Valley at that time. PL-22 V1.0 Page 13 of 14 Spokan Valleys 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? The proposed amendment will not impact environmentally sensitive areas as none exist on the site. SEPA CHECKLIST a. Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: Not applicable. 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? The proposed amendment will not affect any shorelines as none are near or on the site. a. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: Not applicable. 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? The proposed amendment may increase demand on transportation and public services if the site is redeveloped or developed more intensively. The amendment is within the scope of impacts analyzed in the Final Environmental Impact Statement for the 2017-2037 Comprehensive Plan and supporting development regulations. a. Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: The Comprehensive Plan adopts a level -of -service for transportation and public services. The Final Environmental Impact Statement for the 2017-2037 Comprehensive Plan and the 6- year Transportation Improvement Program identifies the necessary projects to maintain the adopted LOS. These transportation and public service projects are implemented both by the city and state and at the project level through concurrency. 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. The proposal does not conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. Any specific issues that may arise during the development of the site will be identified and addressed based upon regulations within the Spokane Valley Municipal Code. E. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, swear under penalty of perjury that the above responses are made truthfully and to the best of my knowledge. I also understand that, should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part, the agency may withdraw any Determination of Nonsignificance that it might issue in reliance upon this check list. Date: 10/27/2021 Signature: Chaz Bates Please print or type: Proponent: City of Spokane Valley Address: 10210 East Sprague Avenue; Spokane Valley, WA 99206 PL-22 V1.0 Page 14 of 14 an Spok._ Valley Phone: (509) 720-5000 SEPA CHECKLIST Person completing form (if different from proponent): Name: Chaz Bates, Senior Planner, City of Spokane Valley Economic Development Division Address: 10210 E Sprague Ave Spokane Valley, WA 99206 Phone: 509-720-5337 PL-22 V1.0 Page 15 of 14 EXHIBIT 9 Notice of Virtual Public Hearing City of Spokane Valley 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Due to the restrictions on public gatherings arising from the covid-19 outbreak, and pursuant to Govemor Inslee's Stay Home, Stay Healthy Proclamation (No. 20-25) and Proclamation 20-28 (and associated extensions), this hearing will be conducted remotely using web and telephone conference tools, as described below. HEARING DATE AND TIME: March 10, 2022, beginning at 6:00 p.m. ZOOM MEETING DETAILS: Join Zoom Meeting A link to the Zoom meeting will be provided on the agenda and posted to the Planning Commission webpage: www.spokanevalley.org/planningcommission. HEARING BODY: Spokane Valley Planning Commission The Planning Commission will hold a public hearing to receive public comment on the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment requests and make a recommendation to the City Council on each of the following applications: FILE No. CPA-2022-01: A request to change the comprehensive plan designation and zoning for 1.03 acres Single Family Residential (SFR) to Multifamily Residential (MFR) for parcels 45204.1436 and 45204.1435; SE 1/4 of Section 20, Township 25 North, Range 44 East, Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washington FILE No. CPA-2022-02: A request to change land use designation and zoning for 0.45 acres from Single Family Residential (SFR) to Parks and Open Space (POS) for parcel: 55073.0458; SW 1/4 of Section 07, Township 25 North, Range 45 East, Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washington FILE No. CPA-2022-03 A request to change land use designation and zoning for 17.64 acres from Single Family Residential (SFR) to Parks and Open Space (POS) for parcels: 44041.0104; 44041.0103; 44041.0102; 44041.9048; 44041.9046; and 44041.9007; NE 1/4 of Section 04, Township 24 North, Range 44 East, Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washington FILE No. CPA-2022-04: A request to amend Figure 27 — Bikeway Network to add north river loop trail. STAFF CONTACT: Chaz Bates, AICP, Senior Planner; (509) 720-5337 cbates@spokanevalley.org ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: The City issued a Determination of Non -significance (DNS) on January 14, 2022 pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) and chapter 21.20 Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC). HEARING PROCEDURES: The Planning Commission will conduct the remote hearing pursuant to the rules of procedure adopted in SVMC Title 18 (Boards and Authorities). The public is encouraged to submit written comments prior to the hearing by sending the comments to Chaz Bates, 10210 E Sprague Ave, Spokane Valley, WA 99206, or email to cbates@spokanevalley.org. You may also hand deliver your comments to City Hall. All comments will need to be received by 4:00 PM on March 9, 2022, for them to be prepared for submission into the record. Comments received will be entered into the record at the time of the public participation portion of the Public Hearing. All interested persons may testify at the remote public hearing via the zoom meeting address and/or phone number. Interested persons will need to sign up to speak no later than 4:00 p.m. on March 10, 2022. Please visit the Planning Commission webpage (see link above) to sign up for oral public comments. This is not an opportunity for questions or discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes per person. Written comments and documents may only be submitted prior to the hearing. Any appeal of the Planning Commission's decision will be based on the record established before the Planning Commission, pursuant to SVMC 17.90 (Appeals). The Planning Commission will forward a recommendation on the request to the Spokane Valley City Council. STAFF REPORT AND INSPECTION OF FILE: A staff report will be available for inspection seven (7) calendar days before the hearing. The staff report and application file may be inspected by visiting the Comprehensive Plan webpage at www.spokanevalley.org/CP. If you have any questions, please contact Chaz Bates, Senior Planner, Economic Development Division, at cbates@spokanevalley.org. Carrie Koudelka, CMC Spokane Valley Deputy City Clerk Publish: February 11, 2022 and February 18, 2022 EXHIBIT 10 STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY 4601 N Monroe Street • Spokane, Washington 99205-1295 • (509)329-3400 January 27, 2022 Chaz Bates, AICP Senior Planner City of Spokane Valley 10210 East Sprague Avenue Spokane Valley, WA 99206 Re: 2022 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment File: CPA-2022-01, 02, 03, and 04 Dear Chaz Bates: Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the Determination of Nonsignificance regarding the 2022 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment (Proponent: City of Spokane Valley and Land Use Solutions). After reviewing the documents, the Department of Ecology (Ecology) submits the following comments: Water Quality Program -Shannon Adams (509) 329-3610 The four SEPA Checklists for the four Comprehensive Plan Amendments appear to be "non -project actions" related to zone changes. Please keep in mind that future soil disturbances at the individual sites may require separate SEPA review. If any of these future projects disturb over one acre of soil and discharge off site, they may also require a Construction Stormwater General Permit. For more information in obtaining a Construction Stormwater General Permit, or for other technical assistance, please contact Shannon Adams at (509) 329-3610 or via email at Shannon.Adams@ecy.wa.gov. State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA)-Cindy Anderson (509) 329-3442 Ecology bases comments upon information submitted for review. As such, comments made do not constitute an exhaustive list of the various authorizations you may need to obtain, nor legal requirements you may need to fulfill in order to carry out the proposed action. Applicants should remain in touch with their Local Responsible Officials or Planners for additional guidance. For information on the SEPA Process, please contact Cindy Anderson at (509) 329-3442 or via email at Cindy.Anderson@ecy.wa.gov. Chaz Bates January 27, 2022 Page 2 To receive more guidance on or to respond to the comments made by Ecology, please contact the appropriate staff listed above at the phone number or email provided. Department of Ecology Eastern Regional Office (Ecology File: 202200232) cc: Dwight Hume, Land Use Solutions EXHIBIT 11 Public Comments (Inserted as received) Siokane Walley COMMUNITY & PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT BUILDING & PLANNING DIVISION STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION CPA-2022-04 STAFF REPORT DATE: February 16, 2022 HEARING DATE AND LOCATION: March 3, 2022, beginning at 6:00 p.m., remotely via Zoom. Project Number: CPA-2022-04 Application Description: A request to amend Figure 27 — Bikeway Network to add north river loop trail. Location: Citywide Applicant: City of Spokane Valley, 10210 E Sprague, Spokane Valley, WA 99206 Owners: Various owners Date of Application: November 1, 2021 Staff Contact: Chaz Bates, Senior Planner, 10210 E Sprague Avenue, Spokane Valley, WA 99206 APPROVAL CRITERIA: Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan, Title 17 Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) General Provisions, Title 19 SVMC Zoning Regulations, and Title 21 SVMC Environmental Controls. ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit 1: Proposed Amendment Exhibit 5: Notice of Public Hearing Exhibit 2: Existing Figure 27 Exhibit 6: Agency Comments Exhibit 3: Environmental Determination Exhibit 7: Public Comments Exhibit 4: SEPA Checklist A. BACKGROUND INFORMATION The proposed amendment is a non -site specific map amendment adding a proposed shared use path to Figure 27-Map of Existing and Recommended Bicycle Facilies of the Comprehensive Plan. The Park and Recreation Master Plan adoted in 2019 identified a potential trail along the north bank of the Spokane River from Plante's Ferry Park to a potential new park generally between Flora to Barker Roads. In 2021, the City acquired about 46 acres between Flora and Barker Roads on the north bank of the Spokane River. This proposed amendment formerly adopts a shared use path along the north bank of the Spokane River. The amendment will bring consistency to adopted plans as well as position the City for grant opportunities. PROPERTY INFORMATION Size and Characteristics: The trail would run along the north bank of the Spokane River from Flora to Plante's Ferry approximately four linear miles. Comprehensive Plan: Parks and Open Space (POS) and Industrial (I) Zoning: Parks and Open Space (P/OS) and Industrial (I) Page 1 of 6 Staff Report CPA-2022-04 Existing Land Use: Vacant Park Land SURROUNDING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, ZONING, AND LAND USES North Comprehensive Plan: POS and I Zoning: I Uses: Industrial, park and vacant land South Comprehensive Plan: POS (across the river) Zoning: PO/S (across the river) Uses: Spokane River and the Centennial Trail East Comprehensive Plan: POS Zoning: P/OS Uses: Newly acquired vacant park land (Flora property) West Comprehensive Plan: Spokane County Urban Reserve Zoning: Spokane County Urban Reserve Uses: Plante's Ferry Park SUMMARY AND IMPLICATIONS OF PROPOSED AMENDMENT: If adopted, the amendment will add a recommended Shared Use Path to Figure 27 of the Comprehensive Plan. The amendment will bring consistency between the Park and Recreation Master Plan adopted in 2019 and the Comprehensive Plan. Including the trail in the Comprehensive Plan will enhance the City's grant opportunities. APPLICATION PROCESSING: Chapter 17.80 Permit Processing Procedures in the SVMC. The following summarizes key application procedures for the proposal. Application Submitted: November 1, 2021 SEPA Determination of Non -Significance Issue date January 14, 2022 End of Appeal Period for DNS: January 28, 2022 Date of Mailed Notice of Public Hearing February 18, 2022 Date of Published Notice of Public Hearing: February 11 and 18, 2022 B. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO SEPA 1. Findings: Pursuant to Title 21 (Environmental Controls) SVMC, the lead agency has determined that the proposal does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). The City issued a Determination of Non -Significance (DNS) for the proposal on January 14, 2022. The determination was made after review of a completed environmental checklist, the application, Titles 19, 21, and 22 of the SVMC, a site assessment, public and agency comments, the Comprehensive Plan and associated Environmental Impact Statement. 2. Conclusion(s): The procedural requirements of the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) and Title 21 SVMC have been fulfilled. Page 2 of 6 Staff Report CPA-2022-04 C. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT AND REZONE i. The City may approve Comprehensive Plan amendments and area -wide zone map amendments if it finds that compliance with the approval criteria in SVMC 17.80.140(H). (1) The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to the public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment; Analysis: The proposed amendment amends Figure 27 — Existing and Recommended Bicycle Facilities. Figure 27 identifies planned shared use paths. In 2019 the City updated the Park and Recreation Master Plan, which identified a potential New Park Area 6 for a new community park on the north bank of the Spokane River between Flora and Barker Road, as well as a potential trail running from Plante's Ferry to the new park. In 2021, the City acquired the north bank property for a new park. This proposed amendment formally adopts the proposed north river loop trail into the Comprehensive Plan as contemplated in the Park and Recreation Master Plan. The public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment are furthered by ensuring the Comprehensive Plan is reflective of regional policy and current with other plans. (2) The proposed amendment is consistent with the requirements of Chapter 36.70A RCW and with the portion of the City's adopted Plan not affected by the amendment; Analysis: The proposed amendment is consistent with the requirements of Chapter 36.70A RCW and with the portion of the City's adopted Plan not affected by the amendment. The Growth Management Act (GMA) adopts fourteen goals to guide the development of local comprehensive plans and development regulations. The proposal is consistent with the GMA goals to enhance recreational opportunities and develop parks and recreation facilities. Additionally, the GMA requires a Parks and Recreation element to be a part of the adopted comprehensive plan. The City's Comprehensive Plan adopts the Parks Plan by reference. (3) The proposed amendment will not have unanticipated impacts on other areas of the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed amendment responds to a substantial change in conditions beyond the property owner's control applicable to the area within which the subject property lies; Analysis: The proposed amendment does not respond to a substantial change in conditions beyond the property owner's control. (4) The proposed amendment corrects an obvious mapping error; or Analysis: The proposed amendment is not in response to an obvious mapping error. However, with the adoption of the Parks and Recreation Master Plan in 2019 and the property acquisition of the Flora property in 2021, the proposed amendment will add the north river loop trail as discussed in the Park Plan and community engagement efforts. The proposed amendment addresses an identified deficiency in the Comprehensive Plan. Analysis: The proposed amendment will address a documented deficiency of park land in the Comprehensive Plan. (5) Page 3 of 6 Staff Report CPA-2022-04 ii. The City must also consider the following factors prior to approving Comprehensive Plan amendments: (6) The effect upon the physical environment; Analysis: The proposal is a graphic change only to Figure 27. It does not directly impact the physical environment. (7) (8) (9) The effect on open space, streams, rivers, and lakes; Analysis: The amendment is not site specific as the physical location of the trail has not been formally identified and the change would not result in effects to the natural environment. The City's critical areas ordinance and shoreline master program will ensure that adequate protection of the critical areas and adjacent shorelands are addressed at the time offuture development. There are no known surface water quality or quantity issues. The compatibility with and impact on adjacent land uses and surrounding neighborhoods; Analysis: The proposed amendment is compatible with the surrounding land uses. Generally, the potential location of the trail is within park designated property. The adequacy of and impact on community facilities including utilities, roads, public transportation, parks, recreation, and schools; Analysis: This is a non -site specific amendment. While the exact location of the potential trail has not been identified, the availability of sewer and water vary, certain potential trailheads may have public services. It is expected that the trail should it be developed would function in a similar fashion as the Centennial Trail, with areas remote and lacking services and others accessible with public services available. (10) The benefit to the neighborhood, City, and region; Analysis: The proposed amendment will provide benefits to the neighborhood and City by providing an opportunity to provide access to the Spokane River and recreational opportunities along on the northside of the river. (11) The quantity and location of land planned for the proposed land use type and density and the demand for such land; Analysis: The City has not adopted a Level -of -Service (LOS) ratio for trails; however, the 2019 Park and Recreation Master Plan identifies that the City will take advantage of recreational opportunities as they arise, and the Comprehensive Plan identifies access to the Spokane River as an opportunity. This location along the north bank of the Spokane River offers a unique chance to take advantage of this opportunity. (12) The current and projected population density in the area; and Analysis: The proposed change would have minimal impact on projected population density. (13) The effect upon other aspects of the Comprehensive Plan. Analysis: The proposal will not have an impact on other aspects of the Comprehensive Plan. In addition to meeting the goals in the Parks and Recreation Master Plan Page 4 of 6 Staff Report CPA-2022-04 the proposed amendment addresses the following goals, policies, and strategy of the Comprehensive Plan: LU-G2 Provide for land uses that are essential to Spokane Valley residents, employees, and visitors. LU-P18 Enable public open spaces. P-Gl Develop, grow, and maintain a diverse and accessible park, recreation, trail, and open space system that enhances community character. P-P5 Design parks and community facilities to provide easy access for pedestrians, bicycles, autos, and public transit. P-P8 Plan for access to parks, trails, and other open spaces in all neighborhoods. Strategy: Evaluate the feasibility of developing a public park along the Spokane River. Conclusion(s): For the reasons outlined above the proposed amendment is consistent with SVMC 17.80.140(H). D. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO PUBLIC COMMENTS 1. Findings: Staff has received no public comments to date. Comments received following the date of this staff report will be provided to the Planning Commission at the March 10, 2022 meeting. 2. Conclusion(s): Notice of Public Hearing (NOPH) was published on February 11 and 18, 2022. Since the amendment is not site specific, no posting or direct mailing was done for the public hearing. E. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO AGENCY COMMENTS 1. Findings: Staff has not received any agency comments of significance to date. Agency Received Comments Comments Dated City of Spokane Valley Senior Traffic Engineer City of Spokane Valley Development Engineering City of Spokane Valley Building & Planning City of Spokane Valley Parks & Recreation Spokane Valley Fire Department City of Millwood City of Liberty Lake City of Spokane City of Spokane Valley Police Department Spokane County, Building and Planning Spokane County, Environmental Services Spokane County, Clean Air Agency Spokane County, Fire District No. 1 Spokane County, Fire District No. 8 Spokane County Regional Health District Page 5 of 6 Staff Report CPA-2022-04 Spokane Regional Clean Air Agency Spokane Aquifer Joint Board Spokane Transit Authority (STA) Spokane Regional Transportation Council (SRTC) Washington State Dept of Commerce Washington State Dept of Ecology (Olympia) Washington State Dept of Ecology (Spokane) Washington State Dept of Fish & Wildlife Washington State Dept of Natural Resources Washington State Dept of Transportation Washington State Parks & Recreation Commission WA Archaeological & Historic Preservation Avista Utilities Inland Power & Light Modern Electric Water Company Central Valley School District #356 East Valley School District #361 West Valley School District #363 Century Link Comcast Model Irrigation District #18 Consolidated Irrigation District #19 East Spokane Water District #1 Vera Water & Power Spokane County Water District #3 Spokane Tribe of Indians 2. Conclusion(s): No concerns are noted. F. CONCLUSION: For the reasons set forth in Section C, the proposed amendment to amend the Comprehensive Plan by adding a proposed Shared Use Path to Figure 27- Map of Existing and Recommended Bicycle Facilities complies with the requirements of the SVMC 17.80.140(H) and the Comprehensive Plan. Page 6 of 6 EXHIBIT 1 E Valley Springs Rd Camp Sekani Park F,rederick,Ave Felts Field Spokan z w 8th Avey� /E, 29th Ave E 37th Ave Spokane County Spokane County 5 E Euclid Ave mood Millwo E Upriver D E Montggrn Dr E ontgormery Av E ansfield Dishman Hills Natural Area Dishman Hills Conservation Area Iller Creek Conservation Area E 44th Ave Mirabeau Point Park E 16th Ave E 32nd Ave E £ th Ave <ro 2 EWellesleyAve Ilivan rk Morrow Park Natural Area Spokan County E S2nd-Ave' r/ 2 E Broadwa Figure 27 Map of Exisiting and Spokane County Recommended Bicyle Facilities Euclid Av Proposed Amendment E Wellesley Proposed Shared Use Path Existing & Proposed Bikeway Network Municipal Boundaries Spokane Valley E Mission Ave EMIs: Liberty L. Mad oAve e country vler< %/ Saltesg Upl an, Conservation Ai V//I Spokane Valley Urban Growth Area (UGA) Parks, Recreation, & Open Space Bikeway Elements — Existing Bike Lane Existing Shared Use Path — Bike Friendly Route Existing Ped/Bike Bridge • Proposed Bike Lane •..t Proposed Ped/Bike Bridge Proposed Shared Use Path 0 0.5 1 " OMiles EXHIBIT 2 E Alley Springs Rd vn Ave z c 37th Ave N I m Camp Sekani Park Felts Field Spokane County Dishman Hills Natural Area Dlshman F€lils Conservation Area Iller Creek Conservation Area la's Fen Park Mirabeau Point Park E Wellesley Ave • Ilivan Park Morrow Park Natural Area Ce x r m z Spokane County Appendix B Figure 27. Bikeway Network Source Page: 5-81 Ordinance No. 19-004 E Wellesley. Effective Date: June 12, 2019 Euclid Ave E Mission Ave E .t=vAve Ceont y 010 Existing & Proposed Bikeway Network Municipal Boundaries Q Spokane Valley . j/Spokane Valley Urban Growth Area (UGP Parks, Recreation, &Open Space Bikeway Elements - Existing Bike Lane - Existing Shared Use Path - Bike Friendly Route n um Existing Ped/Bike Bridge - Proposed Bike Lane •■■r Proposed Pecl/f;ike Bridge m' Proposed5hared Use Path O 0,5 1 1.5 v Miles 0 *Wane Valley k1pC, Product of the City of Spokane Valley, Community and Public Works Department Notice: The information shown on this map is compiled from various sources. The City makes no claims or guarantees about the accuracy or currency of this map and expressly disclaims liability for errors and omissions in its contents. To confirm accuracy contact the City of Spokane Valley, Community Development Department, Division of Planning, (509) 720-5000. EXHIBIT 3 Spakane 4,000Valley COMMUNITY & PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE 10210 East Sprague Avenue • Spokane Valley WA 99206 509.720.5000 • Fax: 509.720.5075 • planning@spokanevalley.org PROJECT: Annual amendments to the Comprehensive Plan for 2022: File Number Description Location Applicant/Owner CPA-2022-01 A request to change the comprehensive plan designation and zoning for 1.03 acres Single Family Residential (SFR) to Multifamily Residential (MFR). Parcels 45204.1436 and 45204.1435; SE'/ of Section 20, Township 25 North, Range 44 East, Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washington SHFI PROPERTIES, LLC/ Land Use Solutions and Entitlement CPA-2022-02 A request to change land use designation and zoning for 0.45 acres from Single Family Residential to Parks and Open Space. Parcel: 55073.0458; SW'/ of Section 07, Township 25 North, Range 45 East, Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washington Spokane Valley/ Spokane Valley CPA-2022-03 A request to change land use designation and zoning for 17.64 acres from Single Family Residential to Parks and Open Space. Parcels: 44041.0104; 44041.0103; 44041.0102; 44041.9048; 44041.9046; and 44041.9007; NE'/ of Section 04, Township 24 North, Range 44 East, Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washington Spokane Valley/ Spokane Valley CPA-2022-04 A request to amend Figure 27 — Bikeway Network to add north river loop trail. Citywide; Spokane Valley Spokane Valley/ Not applicable LEAD AGENCY: City of Spokane Valley. DETERMINATION: Determination of Non -Significance is issued under Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 197- 11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date issued. Comments must be received by 5:00 p.m. on January 28, 2022. Pursuant to Title 21, Environmental Controls of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC), the lead agency has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement is not required under Revised Code of Washington 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. STAFF CONTACT: Chaz Bates, AICP, Senior Planner, City of Spokane Valley, 10210 East Sprague Avenue, Spokane Valley, WA 99206, PH: (509) 720-5337; cbates rr spokanevallev_.org RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: Mike Basinger, AICP, Economic Development Manager, City of Spokane Valley, 10210 East Sprague Avenue, Spokane Valley, WA 99206, PH: (509) 720-5333, mbasin2er a,spokanevallev.or2 DATE ISSUED: January 14, 2022 SIGNATURE:_A,j APPEAL: An appeal of this determination shall be submitted to the Community & PutiKc Works Department within fourteen (14) calendar days after the date issued. The appeal must be written and specific factual objections made to the City's threshold determination. Appeals shall be conducted in conformance with SVMC 17.90 Appeals, and any required fees pursuant to the City's adopted Fee Schedule shall be paid at the time of appeal submittal. Pursuant to WAC 197-11- 680, appeals shall be limited to a review of a final threshold determination. City of Spokane Valley Determination of Non -Significance (DNS) Page 1 of 1 File Nos. CPA-2022-01; CPA-2022-02; CPA-2022-03; CPA-2022-04 EXHIBIT 4 po ne SEPA CHECKLIST SVMC 21.20 10210 E Sprague Avenue • Spokane Valley WA 99206 Phone: (509) 720-5240 • Fax: (509) 720-5075 • permitcenterJ)spokanevalley.org STAFF USE ONLY Date Submitted: Received by: Fee: Not Applicable_ PLUS #: File #: PART I - REQUIRED MATERIAL **THE APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF THE REQUIRED MATERIALS ARE NOT PROVIDED** ❑ Completed SEPA Checklist ❑ Application Fee ❑ Reduced Site Plan of proposal in 81/2" by 11" or 11" by 17" size ❑ Trip Distribution and Generation Letter, if requested by Development Engineering. PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NON -PROJECT PROPOSALS: Complete this checklist for non -project proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NON -PROJECT ACTIONS (Part D). PL-22 V1.0 Page 1 of 14 Spokane ,000Valley SEPA CHECKLIST For non -project actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: CPA-2022-0004 An amendment to the Figure 27 Map of Existing and Recommended Bicycle Facilities. 2. Name of applicant: City of Spokane Valley 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Chaz Bates, Senior Planner, Economic Development Division, Spokane Valley, WA 99206 4. Date checklist prepared: November 1, 2021 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Spokane Valley 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Anticipated adoption June 2022. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? Yes. If yes, explain. The City is currently seeking funding for the development of the North Loop Trail. Development is planned only and future development will require a separate SEPA process. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) was completed for the City's Comprehensive Plan. The document is titled 2017-2037 Comprehensive Plan Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) and supporting Development Regulations. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? None If yes, explain. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Approval by City Council 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) The amendment will add a proposed shared use path to the north bank of the Spokane River from the eastern portion of the recently acquired Flora Park property to approximately Plante's Ferry. The exact details and layout of the route is conceptual. PL-22 V1.0 Page 2 of 14 Spokane 4,000Valley SEPA CHECKLIST 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The proposal is a linear pathway along the north bank of the Spokane River running approximately from Flora Road to Plante's Ferry Park. The project is only conceptually identified at this time. Actual development will be reviewed under a separate SEPA process. 13. Does the proposed action lie within the Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA)? Yes. The general Sewer Service Area? Yes. Priority Sewer Service Area? No. (See: Spokane County's ASA Overlay zone Atlas for boundaries). 14. The following questions supplement Part A. a. Critical Aquifer Recharge Area (CARA) / Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA). 1. Describe any systems, other than those designed for the disposal of sanitary waste, installed for the purpose of discharging fluids below the ground surface (includes systems such as those for the disposal of Stormwater or drainage from floor drains). Describe the type of system, the amount of material to be disposed of through the system and the types of material likely to be disposed of (including materials which may enter the system inadvertently through spills or as a result of firefighting activities). This is a non -project action changing Figure 27 of the Comprehensive Plan. Future development would be analyzed under separate SEPA process. 2. Will any chemicals (especially organic solvents or petroleum fuels) be stored in aboveground or underground storage tanks? If so, what types and quantities of material will be stored? This is a non -project action changing Figure 27 of the Comprehensive Plan. Future development would be analyzed under separate SEPA process. 3. What protective measures will be taken to insure that leaks or spills of any chemicals stored or used on site will not be allowed to percolate to groundwater? This includes measures to keep chemicals out of disposal systems. This is a non -project action changing Figure 27 of the Comprehensive Plan. Future development would be analyzed under separate SEPA process. 4. Will any chemicals be stored, handled or used on the site in a location where a spill or leak will drain to surface or groundwater or to a Stormwater disposal system discharging to surface or groundwater? This is a non -project action changing Figure 27 of the Comprehensive Plan. Future development would be analyzed under separate SEPA process. b. Stormwater PL-22 V1.0 Page 3 of 14 Spokane .0,00Valley 1. What are the depths on the site to groundwater and to bedrock (if known)? Unknown. SEPA CHECKLIST 2. Will stormwater be discharged into the ground? If so, describe any potential impacts. This is a non -project action changing Figure 27 of the Comprehensive Plan and does not evaluate a specific future use. Any future changes will be reviewed under existing stormwater regulations. B. ENVIRONMENTALELEMENTS 1) Earth a.General description of the site (check one): flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other Future development would be analyzed under separate SEPA process. b.What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? unknown. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. This is a non -project action changing Figure 27 of the Comprehensive Plan. Any future changes will be reviewed under a separate SEPA process. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? No. If so, describe. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Also indicate source of fill. Not applicable. c. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? Not applicable. If so, generally describe. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Not applicable. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Not applicable EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY PL-22 V1.0 Page 4 of 14 Spokane 10Valley 2) Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Not applicable. b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that mayaffect your proposal? No. If so, generally describe.. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Not applicable. 3) Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. Yes. The Spokane River is to the south. The Spokane River is a shoreline of the state. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? Not applicable. If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Future development of the site will require review for potential impacts to the shoreline. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. Not applicable. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No. SEPA CHECKLIST EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY PL-22 V1.0 Page 5 of 14 Spokane 10Valley 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. Unknown. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? No. If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. Not applicable. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. Not applicable. c. Water runoff (including stormwater): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. This is a non -project action changing the Figure 27 of the Comprehensive Plan and does not evaluate a specific future use. Any future changes will be reviewed under stormwater regulations in place at time of development. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? Not applicable. If so, generally describe. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: The proposal is a non -project action and does not have a direct effect on the surface, ground or runoff water. SEPA CHECKLIST PL-22 V1.0 Page 6 of 14 Spokane 4,000Valley 4) Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: ❑ deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other ❑ shrubs ❑ grass ❑ pasture ❑ crop or grain ❑ wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other ❑ water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other ❑ other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? None proposed. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: The proposal is a non -project action development of any future development will be analyzed under a separate SEPA. The city has adopted development standards to preserve and enhance vegetation. 5) Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site ❑ birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, ❑ other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, ❑ other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known. c. Is the site part of a migration route? Not applicable. If so, explain. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: The proposal is a non -project action. Future development of the site will be analyzed under a separate SEPA. The city has adopted development standards to preserve and enhance fauna. SEPA CHECKLIST EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY PL-22 V1.0 Page 7 of 14 Spokane .0•00Valley 6). Energy and natural resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Not applicable. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. Not applicable. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Not applicable. 7) Environmental health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe: The proposal is a non - project action changing Figure 27 of the Comprehensive Plan, there are no known environmental health hazards that could occur as a result of this proposal. The development of the park will be analyzed under a separate SEPA. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Not applicable. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: Not applicable. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? The conceptual route runs adjacent to a variety of land uses including industrial sites, open space natural areas, and formal recreational parks it's unlikely these noises will affect trail use. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Not applicable. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Not applicable. SEPA CHECKLIST EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY PL-22 V1.0 Page 8 of 14 Spokane 4,000Valley 8). Land and shoreline use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The conceptual route has a variety of owners, generally the area is used informally as a trail, it is unimproved. A variety of uses including industrial, natural spaces, and formal park spaces are adjacent to the conceptual location. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. Not known. c. Describe any structures on the site. There are no structures on the site. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Various, though expected the majority to be Parks Recreation and Open Space. f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Various, though expected the majority to be Parks Recreation and Open Space. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Urban Conservancy and Urban Conservancy High Quality. If the project occurs with Shoreline Jurisdiction h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. The proposal is a non -project action changing Figure 27 of the Comprehensive Plan, conceptually the trail would be within shoreline jurisdiction. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? None. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? Not applicable. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: Not applicable. I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: Not applicable. SEPA CHECKLIST EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY PL-22 V1.0 Page 9 of 14 Spokane 10Valley 9) Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Not applicable. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Not applicable. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: Not applicable. 10). Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? Not applicable. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Not applicable. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Not applicable. 11). Light and glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Not applicable. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? Not applicable. c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? Not applicable. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Not applicable. SEPA CHECKLIST EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY PL-22 V1.0 Page 10 of 14 Spokane 4,000Valley 12) Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? The conceptual route of the trail is adjacent to Sullivan Park and Plante's Ferry. It would also be adjacent to the recently acquired park property by Flora Road. If the trail is completed it would offer an opportunity to create a loop route using the Centennial Trail. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: The city's adopted comprehensive plan does not adopt a level of service for trails. The City has an adopted Park and Recreation Master Plan that identifies this potential trail as part of the area identified as New Park Area 6 in the 2019 Parks and Recreation Master Plan. 13). Historic and cultural preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. Not applicable. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: Not applicable. 14). Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The amendment to Figure 27 is conceptual, as development of the trail neared, it is expected it would function similar to the Centennial Trail with trailheads in accessible location and other areas being very remote. b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? STA route 96 currently serves the Sullivan corridor with a stop at Sullivan Park, presently no other STA route intersects with the trail. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? Not applicable. SEPA CHECKLIST EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY PL-22 V1.0 Page 11 of 14 Spokane ,10Valley d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? Not applicable. If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? Not applicable. If so, generally describe. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? Not applicable. If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: The city's adopted comprehensive plan adopts a level of service for transportation services. 15) Public services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No. The city's adopted comprehensive plan adopts a level of service for public services. Future development will be analyzed under a separate SEPA for impacts to those services. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. Not applicable. 16) Utilities a. Check utilities currently available at the site: ❑ electricity, ❑ natural gas, ❑water, ❑ refuse service, ❑ telephone, ❑ sanitary sewer, ❑ septic system, ❑ other - describe. While the trail is conceptual only, various locations of would have access to a variety of utilities including water, sewer, refuse service, and electricity. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Not applicable. SEPA CHECKLIST EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: Chaz Bates Date Submitted: 10/28/2021 PL-22 V1.0 Page 12 of 14 Spokane 4,000Valley SEPA CHECKLIST D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NON -PROJECT ACTIONS (Do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? The proposed amendment is not likely to increase emissions to air, production of noise, and discharge to water. The amendment is within the scope of impacts analyzed in the Final Environmental Impact Statement for the 2017-2037 Comprehensive Plan and supporting development regulations. a. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: Consistent with the FEIS of the 2017-2037 Comprehensive Plan, the city adopted implementing regulations while mitigating impacts to the natural environment including an updated critical areas ordinance. On a planning level the adopted regulatory scheme has been identified as sufficient to avoid and reduce impacts to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise. Site specific impacts will be reviewed and mitigated at the time of development based upon adopted regulations within the Spokane Valley. 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? The proposed amendment anticipated not to have impacts on plants and animals. The amendment is within the scope of impacts analyzed in the Final Environmental Impact Statement for the 2017-2037 Comprehensive Plan and supporting development regulations. a. Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: Consistent with the FEIS of the 2017-2037 Comprehensive Plan, the city adopted implementing regulations while mitigating impacts to the natural environment including an updated critical areas ordinance. On a planning level the adopted regulatory scheme has been identified as sufficient to protect and conserve plants and animals. Site specific impacts will be reviewed and mitigated at the time of development based upon adopted regulations within the Spokane Valley at that time. 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? The proposed amendment anticipated not to have impacts on energy and natural resources. The amendment is within the scope of impacts analyzed in the Final Environmental Impact Statement for the 2017-2037 Comprehensive Plan and supporting development regulations. a. Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: Consistent with the FEIS of the 2017-2037 Comprehensive Plan, the city adopted implementing regulations to protect and conserve energy and natural resources. On a planning level, the adopted regulatory scheme has been identified as sufficient to protect and conserve energy and natural resources. Site specific impacts will be reviewed and mitigated at the time of development based upon adopted regulations within the Spokane Valley at that time. PL-22 V1.0 Page 13 of 14 Spokane .0,00Valley 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? While the proposed amendment sets the stage for future development, it does not impact environmentally sensitive areas. Development of the trail or segments of the trail will require their own separate SEPA process. SEPA CHECKLIST a. Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: Consistent with the FEIS of the 2017-2037 Comprehensive Plan and the city adopted implementing regulations while mitigating impacts to environmentally sensitive areas including a critical areas ordinance and shoreline master program. On a planning level the adopted regulatory scheme has been identified as sufficient to protect and conserve and protect environmentally sensitive areas. Site specific impacts will be reviewed and mitigated at the time of development based upon adopted regulations within the Spokane Valley at that time. 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? The proposed amendment will not affect any shorelines; however, future development will require their own separate SEPA process. a. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: Consistent with the FEIS of the 2017-2037 Comprehensive Plan and the city's adopted implementing regulations including a shoreline master program, site specific impacts will be reviewed and mitigated at the time of development based upon adopted regulations within the Spokane Valley at that time. On a planning level the adopted regulatory scheme has been identified as sufficient to protect and shoreline areas. 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? The proposed amendment may increase demand on transportation and public services as the site is redeveloped or developed. The amendment is within the scope of impacts analyzed in the Final Environmental Impact Statement for the 2017-2037 Comprehensive Plan and supporting development regulations. a. Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: The Comprehensive Plan adopts a level -of -service for transportation and public services. The Final Environmental Impact Statement for the 2017-2037 Comprehensive Plan and the 6- year Transportation Improvement Program identifies the necessary projects to maintain the adopted LOS. These transportation and public service projects are implemented both by the city and state and at the project level through concurrency. 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. The proposal does not conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. Any specific issues that may arise during the development of the site will be identified and addressed based upon regulations within the Spokane Valley Municipal Code. E. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, swear under penalty of perjury that the above responses are made truthfully and to the best of my knowledge. I also understand that, should there be any willful misrepresentation or PL-22 V1.0 Page 14 of 14 Spokane 1 Val1ey willful lack of full disclosure on my part, the agency may withdraw any Determination of Nonsignificance that it might issue in reliance upon this check list. Date: 10/28/2021 Signature: Chaz Bates Please print or type: SEPA CHECKLIST Proponent: City of Spokane Valley Address: 10210 East Sprague Avenue; Spokane Valley, WA 99206 Phone: (509) 720-5000 Person completing form (if different from proponent): Name: Chaz Bates, Senior Planner, City of Spokane Valley Economic Development Division Address: 10210 E Sprague Ave Spokane Valley, WA 99206 Phone: 509-720-5337 PL-22 V1.0 Page 15 of 14 EXHIBIT 5 Notice of Virtual Public Hearing City of Spokane Valley 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Due to the restrictions on public gatherings arising from the covid-19 outbreak, and pursuant to Govemor Inslee's Stay Home, Stay Healthy Proclamation (No. 20-25) and Proclamation 20-28 (and associated extensions), this hearing will be conducted remotely using web and telephone conference tools, as described below. HEARING DATE AND TIME: March 10, 2022, beginning at 6:00 p.m. ZOOM MEETING DETAILS: Join Zoom Meeting A link to the Zoom meeting will be provided on the agenda and posted to the Planning Commission webpage: www.spokanevalley.org/planningcommission. HEARING BODY: Spokane Valley Planning Commission The Planning Commission will hold a public hearing to receive public comment on the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment requests and make a recommendation to the City Council on each of the following applications: FILE No. CPA-2022-01: A request to change the comprehensive plan designation and zoning for 1.03 acres Single Family Residential (SFR) to Multifamily Residential (MFR) for parcels 45204.1436 and 45204.1435; SE 1/4 of Section 20, Township 25 North, Range 44 East, Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washington FILE No. CPA-2022-02: A request to change land use designation and zoning for 0.45 acres from Single Family Residential (SFR) to Parks and Open Space (POS) for parcel: 55073.0458; SW 1/4 of Section 07, Township 25 North, Range 45 East, Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washington FILE No. CPA-2022-03 A request to change land use designation and zoning for 17.64 acres from Single Family Residential (SFR) to Parks and Open Space (POS) for parcels: 44041.0104; 44041.0103; 44041.0102; 44041.9048; 44041.9046; and 44041.9007; NE 1/4 of Section 04, Township 24 North, Range 44 East, Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washington FILE No. CPA-2022-04: A request to amend Figure 27 — Bikeway Network to add north river loop trail. STAFF CONTACT: Chaz Bates, AICP, Senior Planner; (509) 720-5337 cbates@spokanevalley.org ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: The City issued a Determination of Non -significance (DNS) on January 14, 2022 pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) and chapter 21.20 Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC). HEARING PROCEDURES: The Planning Commission will conduct the remote hearing pursuant to the rules of procedure adopted in SVMC Title 18 (Boards and Authorities). The public is encouraged to submit written comments prior to the hearing by sending the comments to Chaz Bates, 10210 E Sprague Ave, Spokane Valley, WA 99206, or email to cbates@spokanevalley.org. You may also hand deliver your comments to City Hall. All comments will need to be received by 4:00 PM on March 9, 2022, for them to be prepared for submission into the record. Comments received will be entered into the record at the time of the public participation portion of the Public Hearing. All interested persons may testify at the remote public hearing via the zoom meeting address and/or phone number. Interested persons will need to sign up to speak no later than 4:00 p.m. on March 10, 2022. Please visit the Planning Commission webpage (see link above) to sign up for oral public comments. This is not an opportunity for questions or discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes per person. Written comments and documents may only be submitted prior to the hearing. Any appeal of the Planning Commission's decision will be based on the record established before the Planning Commission, pursuant to SVMC 17.90 (Appeals). The Planning Commission will forward a recommendation on the request to the Spokane Valley City Council. STAFF REPORT AND INSPECTION OF FILE: A staff report will be available for inspection seven (7) calendar days before the hearing. The staff report and application file may be inspected by visiting the Comprehensive Plan webpage at www.spokanevalley.org/CP. If you have any questions, please contact Chaz Bates, Senior Planner, Economic Development Division, at cbates@spokanevalley.org. Carrie Koudelka, CMC Spokane Valley Deputy City Clerk Publish: February 11, 2022 and February 18, 2022 EXHIBIT 6 STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY 4601 N Monroe Street • Spokane, Washington 99205-1295 • (509)329-3400 January 27, 2022 Chaz Bates, AICP Senior Planner City of Spokane Valley 10210 East Sprague Avenue Spokane Valley, WA 99206 Re: 2022 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment File: CPA-2022-01, 02, 03, and 04 Dear Chaz Bates: Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the Determination of Nonsignificance regarding the 2022 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment (Proponent: City of Spokane Valley and Land Use Solutions). After reviewing the documents, the Department of Ecology (Ecology) submits the following comments: Water Quality Program -Shannon Adams (509) 329-3610 The four SEPA Checklists for the four Comprehensive Plan Amendments appear to be "non -project actions" related to zone changes. Please keep in mind that future soil disturbances at the individual sites may require separate SEPA review. If any of these future projects disturb over one acre of soil and discharge off site, they may also require a Construction Stormwater General Permit. For more information in obtaining a Construction Stormwater General Permit, or for other technical assistance, please contact Shannon Adams at (509) 329-3610 or via email at Shannon.Adams@ecy.wa.gov. State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA)-Cindy Anderson (509) 329-3442 Ecology bases comments upon information submitted for review. As such, comments made do not constitute an exhaustive list of the various authorizations you may need to obtain, nor legal requirements you may need to fulfill in order to carry out the proposed action. Applicants should remain in touch with their Local Responsible Officials or Planners for additional guidance. For information on the SEPA Process, please contact Cindy Anderson at (509) 329-3442 or via email at Cindy.Anderson@ecy.wa.gov. Chaz Bates January 27, 2022 Page 2 To receive more guidance on or to respond to the comments made by Ecology, please contact the appropriate staff listed above at the phone number or email provided. Department of Ecology Eastern Regional Office (Ecology File: 202200232) cc: Dwight Hume, Land Use Solutions EXHIBIT 7 Public Comments (Inserted as received) CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: May 24, 2022 Department Director Approval n Check all that apply: n consent n old business ® new business n public hearing n information n admin. Report n pending legislation n executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Second Reading Proposed Ordinance 22-007; 2022 Zoning Map Amendments. GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 36.70A, SVMC 17.80.140, SVMC 17.80.150, and 19.30.010. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: On December 13, 2016, City Council approved Ordinance 16-018 adopting the Comprehensive Plan and associated development regulations as required every eight years. On November 23, 2021, the City Council approved the 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Docket. On May 3, 2022, the Council agreed by consensus to have the proposed Ordinance presented for first reading. BACKGROUND: The GMA (Growth Management Act) allows local jurisdictions to consider amendments to their Comprehensive Plans once each year. The City codified this process in Section 17.80.140 of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC). Consistent with the SVMC, staff published notice on August 20 and 27, 2021, advising the public of the annual amendment process and that the City would accept applications for the 2022 cycle through November 1, 2021. On November 23, 2021, the City Council approved the 2022 Docket. The Docket includes four proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan: three site specific map amendments and an amendment to Figure 27 adding a proposed shared use path. On January 14, 2022, the City issued Determinations of Non -significance (DNS) for the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendments pursuant to Title 21, Environmental Controls of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code. On February 11 and 18, 2022, notice for a public hearing on the proposed amendments was placed in the Spokane Valley News Herald the City's official newspaper. Beginning on February 17, 2022, each site subject to an amendment was posted with a "Notice of Public Hearing" sign with a description of the proposal and information on the public hearing. On February 24, 2022, the Planning Commission held a study session on the proposed 2022 Comprehensive Plan amendments. A public hearing on the proposed amendments was held March 10, 2022. Following the public hearing, the Planning Commission deliberated on each CPA and voted as follows: • The Planning Commission voted 6-1 to forward to City Council a recommendation to approve CPA- 2022-01 and CPA-2022-03. • The Planning Commission voted 7-0 to forward to City Council a recommendation to approve CPA- 2022-02 and CPA-2022-04. An Administrative Report was presented to City Council on May 3, 2022. The Council agreed by consensus to have the proposed Ordinance presented for first reading providing. On May 10, 2022, City Council passed a motion to advance Ordinance 22-007 to a second reading. The draft Ordinance under consideration identifies findings to approve each of the proposed amendments are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan goals and policies, the GMA, and the SVMC. Note that City Council adopted amendments to its Governance Manual that provide that Council will not take public comment on items that have already had a public hearing, such as Zoning Map amendments presented in proposed Ordinance 22-007. 1 of 2 BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: None OPTIONS: Move to approve Ordinance No. 22-007, or take other appropriate action.. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to approve Ordinance No. 22-007, Official Zoning Map Amendments. STAFF CONTACT: Chaz Bates, AICP, Planning Manager ATTACHMENTS: Draft Ordinance No. 22-007 with attachments Yellow Binder previously distributed 2 of 2 Draft CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 22-007 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP AS DESCRIBED IN CPA-2022-01, CPA-2022-02, AND CPA-2022-03; AND PROVIDING FOR OTHER MATTERS PROPERLY RELATING THERETO. WHEREAS, the City of Spokane Valley (City) adopted the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) and the Official City Zoning Map pursuant to Ordinance No. 16-018, on December 13, 2016 (the Official City Zoning Map); and WHEREAS, comprehensive plans may be amended annually pursuant to RCW 36.70A.130 of the Growth Management Act (GMA); and WHEREAS, amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan may be initiated by the Planning Commission (Commission), the City Council (Council), citizens, or by the Community and Public Works Director based on citizen requests or when changed conditions warrant adjustments; and WHEREAS, the GMA requires comprehensive plans to be implemented with development regulations, including the zoning of all properties in the City that are consistent with land use map designations; and WHEREAS, the City adopted Public Participation Guidelines to direct the public involvement process for adopting and amending comprehensive plans; and WHEREAS, the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) provides that amendment applications shall be received prior to November 1 of each year; and WHEREAS, applications were submitted by the applicant, owner, or by City staff to amend the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map for the purpose of beneficially using the property described herein; and WHEREAS, on November 23, 2021, City Council approved the 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Docket; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the State Environmental Protection Act chapter 43.21C RCW (SEPA) and chapter 21.20 SVMC, staff conducted an environmental review to determine the potential environmental impacts from the proposed amendments; and WHEREAS, on January 14, 2022, after reviewing the environmental checklists, staff issued a Determination of Non -Significance (DNS) for each of the proposals, published the DNS in the Valley News Herald, and where appropriate posted the DNS on the sites and mailed the DNS to all affected public agencies; and WHEREAS, on January 19, 2022, the Washington State Department of Commerce was notified pursuant to RCW 36.70A.106 of the City's intent to adopt amendments to the Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, on February 11 and 18, 2022, notice of the Commission public hearing was published in the Valley News Herald, the City's official newspaper; and Ordinance 22-007: 2022 Zoning Map Amendments Page 1 of 9 Draft WHEREAS, on February 16, 2022, notice of the Commission hearing was mailed to all property owners within 400 feet of the subject properties; and WHEREAS, on February 17, 2022, notice of the Commission hearing had been posted on all the subject properties; and WHEREAS, on February 24, 2022, the Commission conducted a study session to review the proposed amendments; and WHEREAS, on March 10, 2022, the Commission received evidence, information, public testimony, and a staff report and recommendation at a public hearing; and WHEREAS, on March 24, 2022, the Commission deliberated and voted to forward CPA-2022-01, CPA-2022-02, CPA-2022-03, and CPA-2022-04, to Council with a recommendation for approval, with written findings of fact setting forth the bases for such recommendations to Council; and WHEREAS, on May 3, 2022, Council conducted a briefing to review the proposed amendments; and WHEREAS, on May 3, 2022, Council concurred to place CPA-2022-01, CPA-2022-02, CPA-2022-03, and CPA-2022-04 in an ordinance for consideration of approval; and WHEREAS, on May 10, 2022, Council considered a first ordinance reading to approve CPA-2022-01, CPA-2022-02, CPA-2022-03, and CPA-2022-04; and WHEREAS, on May 24, 2022, Council considered a second ordinance reading to adopt the proposed amendments for CPA-2022-01, CPA-2022-02, CPA-2022-03, and CPA-2022-04. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley do ordain as follows: Section 1. Purpose. The purpose of this Ordinance is to amend the Official City Zoning Map as described in CPA-2022-01, CPA-2022-02, CPA-2022-03, and CPA-2022-04. Section 2. Findings. Council acknowledges that the Commission conducted appropriate investigation and study and held a public hearing on the proposed amendments to the Official City Zoning Map. Council has considered the Commission's findings. Council makes and adopts findings specific to each Zoning Map amendment as set forth in Section 4 below. The Council hereby makes and adopts the following general findings for CPA-2022-01, CPA-2022-02, CPA-2022-03, and CPA-2022-04. CPA-2022- 04 only proposes amendments to Figure 27 of the Comprehensive Plan, and so does not directly implicate or require amendments to the SMVC or Zoning Map: General Findings: 1. Pursuant to chapter 43.21C RCW (SEPA), environmental checklists were required for each proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment. 2. Staff reviewed the environmental checklists and a threshold determination was made for each proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment. 3. On January 14, 2022, Determination of Non -Significance (DNS) was issued for the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendments. Ordinance 22-007: 2022 Zoning Map Amendments Page 2 of 9 Draft 4. On January 14, 2022, the DNS was published in the City's official newspaper, the Valley News Herald, pursuant to chapter 21.20 SVMC. 5. The procedural requirements of SEPA and Title 21 SVMC have been fulfilled. 6. On January 19, 2022, the Washington State Department of Commerce was provided a notice of intent to adopt amendments to the Comprehensive Plan. 7. On February 16, 2022, individual notices of public hearing for the proposed site -specific map amendments were mailed to all property owners within 400 feet of each affected site. 8. On February 17, 2022 each site subject to a proposed site -specific amendment was posted with a "Notice of Public Hearing" sign, with a description of the proposal. 9. On February 11 and 18, 2022, notice of the Commission public hearing was published in the Valley News Herald. 10. The procedural requirements in SVMC 17.80.140 for the amendment process, including public participation, notice, and public hearing requirements have been met. 11. On March 10, 2022, the Commission held a public hearing on each of the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendments. After receiving public testimony, the public hearing was closed. 12. On March 24, 2022, the Commission deliberated and voted to forward CPA-2022-01, CPA- 2022-02, CPA-2022-03, and CPA-2022-04, to Council with a recommendation for approval. 13. The Commission adopted findings for CPA-2022-01, CPA-2022-02, CPA-2022-03, and CPA- 2022-04. Such findings were presented to Council. Specific findings adopted and made by City Council for each Comprehensive Plan Amendment request are contained in Section 4, below. 14. The Commission and Council have reviewed the proposed amendments concurrently to evaluate the cumulative impacts. The review was consistent with the annual amendment process pursuant to SVMC 17.80.140 and chapter 36.70A RCW. 15. The proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan are consistent with GMA and do not result in internal inconsistencies within the Comprehensive Plan itself. Section 3. Property. The properties subject to this Ordinance are described in Attachment "A" (2022 Official City Zoning Map Amendments). Section 4. Map Amendments. Pursuant to RCW 36.70A.130, the Official City Zoning Map is hereby amended as set forth below and in Attachment "A" (Maps). CPA-2022-04 only proposes amendments to Figure 27 of the Comprehensive Plan, and so does not directly implicate or require amendments to the SMVC or Zoning Map and is not included in Attachment "A". The Zoning Map amendments are generally described as follows: Ordinance 22-007: 2022 Zoning Map Amendments Page 3 of 9 Draft Map Amendments: File No. CPA-2022-01: Proposal: A request to change the Comprehensive Plan designation and zoning for 1.03 acres Single Family Residential (SFR) to Multifamily Residential (MFR). Applicant: Land Use Entitlement Solutions, Dwight Hume Amendment Location: Parcels 45204.1436 and 45204.1435; SE 1/4 of Section 20, Township 25 North, Range 44 East, Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washington. Council adopts and makes the following Findings for CPA-2022-01: 1. This proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to the public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment. The City continues to see increasing population growth with 2020 Census estimates showing a population of just over 104,500; in 2016 the estimate from the Office of Financial Management was 94,160. More recently, the City adopted a Housing Action Plan that shows that seniors (age 65+) are continuing to increase their share of the City's population. This age group includes those in need of assisted living arrangements. Based on conversations with the applicant Sunshine Health, they are requesting a change to MFR to meet future demand for multifamily development that can accommodate an assisted living facility near their existing facility to the west. The proposed change helps meet existing and future demand, helps protect the environment by building in a developed area, and helps Sunshine Health meet a needed public service in a cost-efficient manner. 2. This proposed amendment is consistent with chapter 36.70A RCW and with the portion of the City's adopted Comprehensive Plan not affected by the amendment. The GMA adopts 14 goals to guide the development of local comprehensive plans and development regulations. The request allows opportunity to provide an assisted living facility adjacent to an existing development owned by the same entity. There are no transportation improvements planned adjacent to the site within the planning horizon of 2037. The proposal does not conflict with any other GMA goals. The amendment is not in conflict with any other portions of the Comprehensive Plan. 3. This proposed amendment is not in response to a change in conditions beyond the property owner's control. 4. This proposed amendment is not in response to or to correct an obvious mapping error. The City has experienced continued population growth, especially in age segments that often seek multifamily developments (millennials and seniors). Increasing opportunity for multifamily development in areas that are supported by existing infrastructure provides an opportunity to meet adopted goals, policies, and strategies for housing needs. This proposed amendment provides an additional tool and opportunity to meet the City's housing needs. The Comprehensive Plan identifies the following goals and policy that support the proposed change: a. H-G2 Enable the development of affordable housing for all income levels. b. CF-P2 Optimize the use of existing public facilities before investing in new facilities 5. The change to MFR would allow for expanded uses including multifamily housing and assisted living facilities. The properties would have the opportunity to transition, add density and add different uses including assisted living facilities. There is no concern for the effect on the physical environment. 6. There are no known critical areas associated with the site, such as wetlands, fish and wildlife habitat areas, frequently flooded areas or geologically hazardous areas. The parcel is not located within the shoreline jurisdiction, and there are no known surface water quality or quantity issues. Chapter 21.40 SVMC will ensure adequate protection of critical areas. Ordinance 22-007: 2022 Zoning Map Amendments Page 4 of 9 Draft 7. The parcels are currently vacant. A multifamily building was previously located on the northern parcel but was demolished in 2017. The adjacent use to the west is the existing Sunshine Health facility that provides a variety of health -related services including assisted living. West of the existing Sunshine Health facility is Valley Christian School; to the north, east, and south are single-family residences. All the properties except for the existing Sunshine Health facility are designated Single Family Residential and zoned R-3. If the amendment is approved any future development would be subject to the City's transitional provision. 8. Raymond Road and loth and 1 lth Avenues are Local Access streets. There are no planned transportation projects in the area. The nearest City recreational facility is Appleway Trail, approximately 1/2 mile to the north. The closest formal City park is Balfour Park, approximately one mile to the north. A project on the site would be considered infill development. As such, the expansion of allowed uses and increased densities are supported by the infrastructure that is in place. Various Planning Commission members had concerns regarding adequacy of on -street parking in the area and its ability to support future uses allowed in the MFR. Future development of the site will be subject to development regulations in place at the time of development. 9. This proposed change would allow the property to increase density and support infill development in an area planned for urban growth. The change will support the identified need for housing. The change benefits the neighborhood, City, and region by supporting the following adopted Comprehensive Plan goals: a. H-GI Allow for a broad range of housing opportunities to meet the needs of the community. b. H-G2 Enable the development of affordable housing for all income levels. 10. This proposal would add approximately one acre of MFR property. The MFR designation in this location would allow for increased options for development including an assisted living facility in an area adjacent to an existing facility. The proposal is limited to a reasonable area and impacts to adjacent Single Family Residential zones would be mitigated by the adopted transitional provisions. 11. Currently, the site allows for 8 dwelling units per acre. If the proposal is approved, it would allow for up to 22 dwelling units per acre, a net increase of up to 14 dwelling units. The proposed change would have little impact on overall population density. 12. The MFR designation would support the goals and policies identified above. The amendment will have no effect on other elements of the Comprehensive Plan, including Housing, Capital Facilities and Public Services, Public and Private Utilities, Parks and Open Space and Natural Resources. 13. The criteria of SVMC 17.80.140(H) are met by the amendment. Council Decision: Change the designation for parcel numbers 45204.1436 and 45204.1435 to Multiple Family Residential (MFR). File No. CPA-2022-02: Proposal: A request to change land use designation and zoning for.45 acres from Single Family Residential to Parks and Open Space. Applicant: City of Spokane Valley. Amendment Location: Parcel: 55073.0458; SW 1/4 of Section 07, Township 25 North, Range 45 East, Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washington Council adopts and makes the following Findings for CPA-2022-02: 1. This proposed amendment to change the designation for .45 acres from SFR to P/OS bears a substantial relationship to the public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment. In 2021, the City purchased the parcel from Spokane County for the river loop trail project and for future access improvements to the Centennial Trail at Flora Road for the purpose of expanding / increasing access to the City's park lands. This area was generally identified as New Park Area 6 Ordinance 22-007: 2022 Zoning Map Amendments Page 5 of 9 Draft in the 2019 Parks and Recreation Master Plan. These plans were developed through an extensive community engagement process. Additionally, the expansion is necessary to achieve the adopted Level of Service (LOS) 3.25 acres of park land for every 1,000 residents. 2. This proposed amendment is consistent with chapter 36.70A RCW and with the portion of the City's adopted Comprehensive Plan not affected by the amendment. The GMA adopts fourteen goals to guide the development of local comprehensive plans and development regulations. The proposal is consistent with the GMA goals to enhance recreational opportunities and develop parks and recreation facilities. Additionally, the GMA requires a Parks and Recreation element to be a part of the adopted comprehensive plan. The City's Comprehensive Plan adopts the Parks Plan by reference. This proposed amendment will not have unanticipated impacts on other areas of the Comprehensive Plan. 3. This proposed amendment does not respond to a substantial change in conditions beyond the property owner's control applicable to the area within which the subject property lies. 4. This proposed amendment is not in response to or to correct an obvious mapping error. 5. This proposed amendment will address a documented deficiency of park land in the Comprehensive Plan. 6. The change to P/OS will not impact the physical environment. The change will result in less intensive uses than are currently allowed in SFR reducing the potential effects on the physical environment. 7. According to the City's Critical Area map, the parcel is not impacted by any known critical areas, such as wetlands, fish and wildlife habitat areas, geologically hazardous areas or frequently flooded areas. The parcel is located within shoreline jurisdiction and designated in the Shoreline Master Program as Shoreline Residential Upland. There are no known surface water quality or quantity issues. Chapter 21.40 SVMC and chapter 21.50 SVMC will ensure that adequate protection of the critical areas and adjacent land shorelands are addressed at the time of future development. 8. This proposed amendment is compatible with the surrounding land uses. Future development of the park space will remedy a documented need and location identified in the 2019 Parks and Recreation Master Plan. 9. Sewer and water are available to the site. The nearest formal park is Greenacres Park approximately 1.25 miles to the southeast, the Centennial Trail is immediately to the north, and across the Spokane River is the newly acquired Flora Park property. The proposal will increase park land and allow future development to access the newly -acquired Flora Park property as part of the north river loop trail proposal. The site is served by Flora Road, an Urban Major Collector. The existing and forecast Level of Service (LOS) for Flora Road at this location is A-C which is within the adopted LOS; Montgomery Avenue at this location is a local access street and does not have an adopted LOS. There are no planned capacity or preservation projects planned in this area. 10. This proposed amendment will provide benefits to the neighborhood and City by providing an opportunity to provide access to planned improvements on the north side of the Spokane River. 11. The quantity and location of park land is planned for and needed as identified in the Parks Plan. An access point at this location furthers the goals of the Parks Plan and Comprehensive Plan and would provide easy access for pedestrians and bicycles. 12. The proposed change would have minimal impact on projected population density. 13. The proposal will not have an impact on other aspects of the Comprehensive Plan. In addition to meeting the goals in the Parks and Recreation Master Plan the proposed amendment addresses the following goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan: a. LU-G2 Provide for land uses that are essential to Spokane Valley residents, employees, and visitors. b. LU-P18 Enable public open spaces. c. P-GI Develop, grow, and maintain a diverse and accessible park, recreation, trail, and open space system that enhances community character. Ordinance 22-007: 2022 Zoning Map Amendments Page 6 of 9 Draft d. P-P5 Design parks and community facilities to provide easy access for pedestrians, bicycles, autos, and public transit. e. P-P8 Plan for access to parks, trails, and other open spaces in all neighborhoods. 14. The criteria of SVMC 17.80.140(H) are met by the amendment. Council Decision: Change the designation for parcel number 55073.0458 to Parks and Open Space (P/OS). File No. CPA-2022-03: Proposal: A request to change land use designation and zoning for 17.64 acres from Single Family Residential to Parks and Open Space.. Applicant: City of Spokane Valley Amendment Location: 44041.0104; 44041.0103; 44041.0102; 44041.9048; 44041.9046; and 44041.9007; NE 1/4 of Section 04, Township 24 North, Range 44 East, Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washington. Council adopts and makes the following Findings for CPA-2022-03: 1. This proposed amendment to change the designation for 17.64 acres from SFR to P/OS bears a substantial relationship to the public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment. In 2021, the City purchased six parcels southeast of the intersection of 44th Avenue and Bates Road for the purpose of expanding the City's park lands. This area was identified as New Park Area 3 in the 2019 Parks and Recreation Master Plan, which was developed through an extensive community engagement process. Additionally, the expansion is necessary to maintain the adopted Level of Service (LOS) 3.25 acres of park land for every 1,000 residents. 2. This proposed amendment is consistent with Chapter 36.70A RCW and with the portion of the City's adopted Comprehensive Plan not affected by the amendment. The GMA adopts fourteen goals to guide the development of local comprehensive plans and development regulations. This proposal is consistent with the GMA goals to enhance recreational opportunities and develop parks and recreation facilities. Additionally, the GMA requires a Parks and Recreation element to be a part of the adopted comprehensive plan. The City's Comprehensive Plan adopts the Parks Plan by reference. The proposed amendment will not have unanticipated impacts on other areas of the Comprehensive Plan 3. This proposed amendment does not respond to a substantial change in conditions beyond the property owner's control applicable to the area within which the subject property lies. 4. This proposed amendment is not in response to or to correct an obvious mapping error. 5. This proposed amendment will address a documented deficiency of park land in the Comprehensive Plan. 6. The change to P/OS will not impact the physical environment. The change will result in less intensive uses than are currently allowed in SFR reducing the potential effects on the physical environment. 7. According to the City's Critical Area map, the eastern parcels are within a Geological Hazardous area identified as Quaternary Alluvium, development of the site may require additional report or studies. There are no known other critical areas associated with the site, such as wetlands, fish and wildlife habitat areas, or frequently flooded areas. The parcels are not located within shoreline jurisdiction, and there are no known surface water quality or quantity issues. Chapter 21.40 SVMC will ensure that adequate protection of the critical areas and adjacent land use are addressed at the time of future development. 8. This proposed amendment is compatible with the surrounding land uses. Future development of the park space will provide a documented need and location identified in the 2019 Parks and Recreation Master Plan. 9. Sewer and water are available to the site. The nearest formal park is Castle Park approximately 2 miles to the north, the Glenrose Unit of Dishman Hills is approximately 1.5 miles to west. The Ordinance 22-007: 2022 Zoning Map Amendments Page 7 of 9 Draft proposal will increase park land and future development will enhance the park system helping maintain the adopted LOS. 10. This proposed amendment will provide benefits to the neighborhood and City by providing an opportunity to provide park space to the neighborhood. The expansion of park space in this area will help the City meet its adopted LOS for park land. A minority of the Planning Commission had concerns with the potential location of a new fire station across the street from the existing fire station and the potential impact on the newly acquired park property. 11. The quantity and location of park land is planned for and needed as identified in the Parks Plan. A neighborhood park at this location furthers the goals of the Parks Plan and Comprehensive Plan. The site provides easy access for pedestrians, bicycles, and automobiles. 12. This proposed change would have minimal impact on projected population density. 13. The proposal will not have an impact on other aspects of the Comprehensive Plan. In addition to meeting the goals in the Parks and Recreation Master Plan the proposed amendment addresses the following goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan: a. LU-G2 Provide for land uses that are essential to Spokane Valley residents, employees, and visitors. b. LU-P18 Enable public open spaces. c. P-GI Develop, grow, and maintain a diverse and accessible park, recreation, trail, and open space system that enhances community character. d. P-P5 Design parks and community facilities to provide easy access for pedestrians, bicycles, autos, and public transit. e. P-P8 Plan for access to parks, trails, and other open spaces in all neighborhoods. 14. The criteria of SVMC 17.80.140(H) are met by the amendment. Council Decision: Change the designation for parcel numbers 44041.0104; 44041.0103; 44041.0102; 44041.9048; 44041.9046; and 44041.9007 to Parks and Open Space (P/OS). Section 5. Zoning Map/Official Controls. Pursuant to RCW 35A.63.100, for the purpose of regulating the use of land and to implement and give effect to the Comprehensive Plan, the City hereby amends the Official City Zoning Map as set forth in Attachment "A". Section 6. Adoption of Other Laws. To the extent that any provision of the SVMC, or any other law, rule, or regulation referenced in the attached Zoning Map(s) is necessary or convenient to establish the validity, enforceability, or interpretation of the Zoning Map(s), then such provision of the SVMC, or other law, rule, or regulation is hereby adopted by reference. Section 7. Map - Copies on File -Administrative Action. The Zoning Map is maintained in the office of the City Clerk as well as the City Depaitnient of Community and Public Works. The City Manager or designee, following adoption of this Ordinance, is authorized to modify the Zoning Map in a manner consistent with this Ordinance, including correcting scrivener's errors. Section 8. Liability. The express intent of the City is that the responsibility for compliance with the provisions of this Ordinance shall rest with the permit applicant and their agents. This Ordinance and its provisions are adopted with the express intent to protect the health, safety, and welfare of the general public and are not intended to protect any particular class of individuals or organizations. Section 9. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause, or phrase of this Ordinance shall be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause, or phrase of this Ordinance. Ordinance 22-007: 2022 Zoning Map Amendments Page 8 of 9 Draft Section 10. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect five days after publication of this Ordinance or a summary thereof in the official newspaper of the City as provided by law. PASSED by the City Council this day of May, 2022. ATTEST: Pam Haley, Mayor Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Approved as to form: Office of the City Attorney Date of Publication: Effective Date: Ordinance 22-007: 2022 Zoning Map Amendments Page 9 of 9 Attachment "A", Ordinance 22-007 Proposed Zoning Map E 9th Ave S Balfour Rd S Raymond Rd E 10th Ave E Ilth Ave E 13th Ave S Oberlin Rd Legend Zoning MI R-1 R-2 R-3 R-4 A E 9th Ave E 10th Ave 11thart E 12th Ave i MFR CMU POS RC NC all IMU MU rLJ 1 I I 0 50 100 200 300 400 Feet File: CPA-2022-01 Owner: SHFI Properties (Sunshine Health) Parcel(s): 45204.1436 and 45204.1435 Address: 10506 E 10th and Unaddressed Request: Proposed change: Comp Plan Map: SFR to MFR Zoning Map: R-3 to MFR Proposed Zoning Map ikd WA State Parks - Centennial Trail Spokane River E Knox-Ln E Indiana Ave ca 0 et Pie E Mansfield Ave Legend Zoning M'R-1 R-2 R-3 R-4 II II II II II II II II II I11 MFR CMU POS RC NC IMU MU 0 50 100 200 300 400 Feet File: CPA-2022-02 Owner: Spokane County (Spokane Valley in process of purchase) Parcel(s): 55073.0458 Address: 17105 E Montgomery Ave Request: Proposed change: Comp Plan Map: SFR to P/OS Zoning Map: R-2 to P/OS Proposed Zoning Map E 44th Ave E 47th Ave Ei 46th Ave S Bates Rd .E 47th Ct CI E Thorpe Rd Legend Zoning MI R-1 R-2 R-3 R-4 MFR CMU POS RC NC - IMU MU rLJ 1 I I 0 50 100 200 300 400 Feet File: CPA-2022-03 Owner: Spokane Valley, 10210 E Sprague Parcel(s): 44041.0104, 44041.0103, 44041.0102, 44041.9048, 44041.9046, 44041.9007 Address: Unaddressed Request: Comp Plan Map: SFR to POS Zoning Map: R-2 to POS CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: May 24, 2022 Department Director Approval: El Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ® new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: First reading — Proposed Ordinance 22-009 - Parking regulations and enforcement on public rights -of -way. GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 46.61.570; WAC 308-330-462; WAC 308-330-265; WAC 308- 330-270; chapter 46.55 RCW; chapter 9.05 SVMC. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: March 6, 2003, adoption of the Model Traffic Ordinance (MTO), later codified as chapter 9.05 SVMC; October 24, 2006, amended MTO relating to establishing speed limits; March 24, 2009, amended MTO relating to establishing speed limits; February 16, 2021, administrative report on parking issues on residential streets; March 16, 2021, administrative report on parking issues on residential streets; April 13, 2021, administrative report on parking issues, including discussion on authority to establish areas in the City where parking is prohibited; October 19, 2021, administrative report on authority to impose parking prohibitions; March 15, 2022, administrative report. BACKGROUND: In Council meetings throughout 2021, the City received citizen comments relating to parking issues in certain areas, primarily in residentially zoned areas. At the October 19, 2021 meeting, Council stated that it wanted to clarify the respective responsibility between Council and staff for the establishment of site -specific parking prohibitions; and it was determined that staff would be responsible for certain traffic safety prohibitions, and Council would be responsible for identifying areas where parking is prohibited based upon public policy criteria. The City has received the data regarding the location of all existing signs relating to parking prohibitions or limitations, and is converting that to a GIS (geographic information system) layer for use in drafting a Master Parking Prohibition Schedule for future discussion and adoption by Council. Proposed SVMC 9.40.010 identifies the authority staff would have pursuant to Washington Administrative Code 308-330-265(11-13) to establish or remove parking prohibitions in limited circumstances and would require that any areas so identified be listed in a Master Parking Prohibition Schedule to be adopted by Council. Proposed SVMC 9.40.020 identifies the authority Council would have to establish parking prohibitions in all other areas of the City, including certain criteria Council should consider when deciding whether to add or remove parking prohibitions under this section. This section would also require that any areas so identified be listed in a Master Parking Prohibition Schedule to be adopted by Council. Proposed SVMC 9.40.030 states that parking in an area identified in SVMC 9.40.010 or .020, and listed on the Master Parking Prohibition Schedule, would be a violation subject to a $30 fine, and if left for a short period of time, would be subject to impoundment. Council will need to decide how long a vehicle may remain after receiving the notice and fine before that vehicle will be subject to impoundment. Placeholder language is in this draft for 24, 48, or 72 hours, to be determined by Council. Proposed SVMC 9.40.040 would prohibit parking a junk vehicle, as defined by SVMC 7.05.020, on the right-of-way, regardless of whether the junk vehicle is subsequently moved to a different portion of the right-of-way. In other words, the City would not be chasing them around a neighborhood as they move a few feet each day. The vehicle would need to be moved to private property to avoid having it impounded. Similarly, this section would prohibit any vehicle with a vehicle registration from the state that is expired for more than 45 days from parking in the public right-of-way. Lastly, it would prohibit the parking of a vehicle within 15 feet on either side of a US Postal Service mailbox. Proposed SVMC 9.40.050 would establish a daily $30 fine for a violation of SVMC 9.40.030 and .040. At the March 15 meeting, staff discussed with Council that these new regulations will require additional personnel to enforce them. Council instructed staff to work with the Spokane Valley Police Department and SCOPE to attempt to identify additional SCOPE volunteers for these enforcement purposes. Those discussions are on -going; staff does not have any conclusive answers on that issue at this time but does anticipate having this addressed prior to ordinance second reading. Staff spoke with staff for the District Court about collecting the fines since they collect fines on other infractions on behalf of the City. They would be able and willing to do this as well, and the cost would be added into the existing contract at the per case rate of $47.84. All fines collected would be paid directly to the City. Pursuant to existing Court policy, an additional $25 fee is imposed for failing to appear or respond, which would also be paid to the City. Once Council adopts Ordinance 22-009, there will be a short period of time necessary to implement the Code, primarily to draft a new citation ticket, which must then be approved by the Administrative Office of the Courts following adoption, currently anticipated to be 30-45 days. Lastly, staff is working on compiling a comprehensive list of areas currently designated or signed as being a no parking area. This will be attached to a resolution for adoption as the Master No Parking Schedule contemporaneous, with or shortly following the second reading of this Ordinance 22-009. OPTIONS: (1) Move to advance Ordinance 22-009 to a second reading; or (2) take other action as appropriate. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: I move to advance Ordinance 22-009 to a second reading, as proposed. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Unknown. STAFF CONTACT: Cary Driskell, City Attorney; Jerremy Clark, Traffic Engineering Manager; Dave Ellis, Police Chief. ATTACHMENTS: Proposed Ordinance 22-009. DRAFT CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 22-009 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING A NEW CHAPTER 9.40 OF THE SPOKANE VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO PARKING PROHIBITIONS, AND OTHER MATTERS RELATING THERETO WHEREAS, pursuant to chapter 9.05 SVMC, the City has adopted the Washington Model Traffic Ordinance, Chapter 308-330 WAC, as the traffic code of the City of Spokane Valley, which authorizes the City Council and the Traffic Engineer to determine and designate site -specific parking prohibitions in the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council now desires to identify all previously -adopted site -specific parking prohibitions applicable on City roads, in a format that is more accessible and easier to use for the public. The new format is referred to as the "Master Parking Prohibition Schedule," and may be amended periodically pursuant to criteria in City Code and Washington law; and WHEREAS, the City Council has authority pursuant to RCW 46.61.570 and WAC 308-330-270 to establish general and site -specific parking prohibitions, which is an exercise of power of the City to protect the health, safety, and welfare of its citizens; and WHEREAS, RCW 46.61.570 currently contains many specific prohibitions or limitations on where and when people may park on public rights -of -way. City Council now desires to establish additional site -specific parking prohibitions beyond those that are statutory for reasons of public policy, efficiency, or convenience, and to create appropriate criteria for the establishment of the same; and WHEREAS, the Senior Traffic Engineer has conducted or will conduct an engineering and traffic investigation for all proposed changes to site -specific parking prohibitions pursuant to WAC 308-330-270; and WHEREAS, the Senior Traffic Engineer has authority pursuant to WAC 308-330-265(11-13) to determine and designate site -specific parking prohibitions in certain circumstances and maintain and erect signs and signals indicating the same to enhance safe and efficient movement of traffic; and WHEREAS, the City Council has authority pursuant to RCW 46.55.240 to adopt ordinances concerning authorized, abandoned, or impounded vehicles, authorize impoundment upon the public right- of-way, and establish a written form of authorization to impound, including but not limited to a law enforcement notice of infraction or citation; and WHEREAS, City Council further desires to adopt and implement parking restrictions relating to parking in a manner that interferes with delivery by the United States Postal Service on public rights -of - way. NOW THEREFORE the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley, Spokane County, Washington, ordains as follows: Section 1. Purpose. The purpose of this Ordinance is to adopt chapter 9.40 SVMC to establish general and site -specific parking prohibitions in the City. Ordinance 22-009 Adopting Chapter 9.40 SVMC — Parking Page 1 of 5 DRAFT Section 2. Spokane Valley Municipal Code Chapter 9.40 is hereby adopted as follows: Chapter 9.40 PARKING PROHIBITIONS. SVMC 9.40.005. Definitions. The definitions in Title 46 RCW shall apply to chapter 9.40 SVMC unless otherwise specifically identified within this chapter. SVMC 9.40.010. Traffic Engineer Authority to Establish Site -Specific Parking Prohibitions. A. Pursuant to WAC 308-330-265(11-13), the traffic engineer may establish, amend, or repeal site - specific parking prohibitions on public streets and highways pursuant to specified, limited circumstances in the interest of public safety. Site -specific parking prohibitions shall be appropriately marked and maintained pursuant to WAC 308-330-409. B. All site -specific parking prohibitions adopted pursuant to SVMC 9.40.010(A) shall be maintained in a Master Parking Prohibition Schedule, Subsection A: Site -Specific Parking Prohibitions —Traffic Engineer, however failure to adopt a Master Parking Prohibition Schedule or failure to list any specific area or areas shall not affect the enforceability of this section for violations. SVMC 9.40.020. City Council Authority to Establish Site -Specific Parking Prohibitions. A. City Council may, by resolution and following consideration of a report by the traffic engineer, establish, amend, or repeal site -specific parking prohibitions adopted pursuant to SVMC 9.40.020, which shall be appropriately marked and maintained pursuant to WAC 308-330-409. When determining whether to establish, amend, or repeal site -specific parking prohibitions, City Council may consider at least the factors including the following: 1. The relationship between the need for parking spaces for adjacent land uses, the purpose of the parking prohibition, and the need for parking spaces for the general public; 2. The interests of property owners, patrons, and prospective patrons of the places within the block or area served by the parking prohibition; 3. A detailed strip map of the area showing any State Route Mileposts (SR/MP), intersecting streets, and driveways, and other on -street or off-street parking alternatives; 4. Photos or video if available; and 5. The type of parking prohibition contemplated. B. When determining whether to establish, amend, or repeal site -specific parking prohibitions, City Council shall consider the report by the traffic engineer pursuant to SVMC 9.40.020(A), which shall include analysis of the following in the vicinity: Ordinance 22-009 Adopting Chapter 9.40 SVMC — Parking Page 2 of 5 DRAFT 1. The volume of traffic; 2. The volume of parking; 3. The width of the surface street and unimproved right-of-way; 4. Operational conditions identifying need for regulation of parked vehicles, including: a. Narrow shoulders, b. Limited sight distances, c. Roadway speed limit, d. Reported crashes susceptible to correction by parking restrictions; and 5. Comments by the City's Police Chief or designee and from the applicable Fire District. C. All site -specific parking prohibitions adopted pursuant to SVMC 9.40.020(A) shall be maintained in a Master Parking Prohibition Schedule, Subsection B: Site -Specific Parking Prohibitions —City Council, however failure to adopt a Master Parking Prohibition Schedule or failure to list any specific area or areas shall not affect the enforceability of this section for violations. SVMC 9.40.030. Site -specific parking prohibitions in violation of Master Parking Prohibition Schedule. A. No person shall stop, stand, or park a vehicle within any site -specific no -parking zone listed in the Master Parking Prohibition Schedule. B. It is not a violation of SVMC 9.40.030(A) to stop, stand, or park a vehicle when necessary to avoid conflict with other traffic, when actively picking up or dropping off a passenger(s), or in compliance with the law, directions of a police officer, or official traffic control device. C. In addition to potential impoundment, vehicles stopped, standing, or parked in violation of SVMC 9.40.030(A) are subject to the fine pursuant to SVMC 9.40.050. D. If a vehicle remains stopped, standing, or parked in violation of SVMC 9.40.030(A) for (24/48/72?) hours after the original notice of violation and fine, the vehicle is subject to impoundment pursuant to RCW 46.55.085. E. All impoundment procedures for SVMC 9.40.030 shall be governed by chapter 46.55 RCW. SVMC 9.40.040. Other parking prohibitions. A. No person shall stop, stand, or park a vehicle: 1. On a public right-of-way when that vehicle meets the definition of a junk vehicle pursuant to SVMC 7.05.020, regardless of whether the vehicle is subsequently moved to another area of public right-of-way. Ordinance 22-009 Adopting Chapter 9.40 SVMC — Parking Page 3 of 5 DRAFT 2. When that vehicle is parked on a public street and has an expired registration of more than 45 days pursuant to RCW 46.55.113, regardless of whether the vehicle is subsequently moved to another area of public right-of-way. 3. Within 15 feet on either side of any United State Postal Service mailbox, except when in the act of delivering or picking up mail or while actively picking up or dropping off a passenger(s). B. It is not a violation of SVMC 9.40.040(A) to stop, stand, or park a vehicle when necessary to avoid conflict with other traffic, or in compliance with the law, directions of a police officer, or official traffic control device. C. Vehicles stopped, standing, or parked in violation of SVMC 9.40.040(A) are unauthorized vehicles subject to impoundment 24 hours after notice is posted on the vehicle pursuant to RCW 46.55.085. D. In addition to potential impoundment, vehicles stopped, standing, or parked in violation of SVMC 9.40.040(A) are subject to the fine pursuant to SVMC 9.40.050. E. All impoundment procedures for SVMC 9.40.040 shall be governed by chapter 46.55 RCW. SVMC 9.40.050. Parking prohibitions —fines. A. In addition to potential impoundment, vehicles stopped, standing, or parked in violation of chapter 9.40 SVMC are subject to a fine of $30 dollars per day. B. Notice of each fine that is assessed pursuant to chapter 9.40 SVMC shall be posted on the vehicle, and shall include: 1. The date of the original notice of violation and fine. 2. The date of the current notice of violation and fine. 3. A warning that the vehicle may be impounded if it is not moved within (24/48/72) hours after the original notice of violation and fine. 4. The assessment of the $30 fine, payable to the City of Spokane Valley. 5. Contact information for the City of Spokane Valley. 6. Information concerning an opportunity to appeal the assessment of violation and fine. Section 3. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause, or phrase of this Ordinance should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance. Section 4. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective five days after publication of the ordinance, or a summary thereof, in the official newspaper of the City. Adopted this day of , 2022. Ordinance 22-009 Adopting Chapter 9.40 SVMC — Parking Page 4 of 5 DRAFT ATTEST: CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Pam Haley, Mayor Approved as to Form: Office of the City Attorney Date of Publication: Effective Date: Ordinance 22-009 Adopting Chapter 9.40 SVMC — Parking Page 5 of 5 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: May 24, 2022 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ® new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Motion Consideration — Barker Road/BSNF Grade Separation Project (Barker Road GSP), Change Order Approval GOVERNING LEGISLATION: • RCW 35.77.010, Perpetual Advanced Six -Year plans for coordinated transportation program expenditures. • SVMC 3.35.010, Contract Authority PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: • May 7, 2013 — Administrative Report, Bridging the Valley; • June 23, 2015 — Passed Resolution No. 15-005 adopting the 2016-2021 Six Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP), which included both the Barker Road and the Pines Road Grade Separation Projects (GSP); • April 5, 2016 — Passed motion to obligate federal earmark funds for the design of the GSP; • November 8, 2016 — (Special 5 pm Meeting) Information Report on the status of the Barker GSP; • November 15, 2016 — Administrative Report on the Barker GSP status; • November 22, 2016 — Informational Report; • December 6, 2016 — Administrative Report; • December 20, 2016 — Administrative Report; • January 10, 2017 — Motion failed to contract with David Evans and Associates (DEA) for project design services; • February 21, 2017 — Administrative Report; • February 28, 2017 — Passed Resolution 17-006, amending the 2017 TIP; • May 23, 2017 — Passed Resolution No. 17-011 adopting the 2018-2023 Six -Year TIP, which included the Grade Separation Project; • August 22, 2017 — Passed motion to enter into contract with DEA for the project's Phase 1 (Initial Contract); • October 24, 2017 — Administrative Report to discuss alternatives; • January 30, 2018 — Administrative Report to discuss alternatives with Council consensus to move the project forward with Alternative 5; • March 2, 2018 — Administrative Report to discuss alternatives; • March 13, 2018 — Administrative Report to discuss history and alternatives; • March 16, 2018 — Administrative Report for Council and Chamber of Commerce; • March 27, 2018 — Passed motion to select preferred alternative for advancing project; • April 10, 2018 — Passed motion to execute supplemental agreement with DEA for the project's Phase 2 design (DEA Contract Supplement #3); • December 4, 2018 — Administrative Report to discuss project status; • September 10, 2019 — Adoption of Ordinance 19-012 authorizing use of condemnation for property acquisition with regards to three property owners; • November 12, 2019 — Adoption of Ordinance 19-020 authorizing use of condemnation for property acquisition with regard to a fourth property owner; • January 14, 2020 — Passed motion to execute supplemental agreement with DEA; • January 21, 2020 — Passed motion to acquire two properties for the project; Page 1 of 3 • March 31, 2020 — Passed motion to execute agreement with Avista Corporation; • May 12, 2020 — Passed motion to execute BSNF Overpass Agreement; • June 30, 2020 — Passed motion to execute an Interlocal Agreement with WSDOT for Project Construction and Construction Administration; and, • February 2, 2021 — Administrative Report on bid award. • May 4, 2021 — Passed motion to amend Avista Corporation agreement • January 18, 2022 — Administrative Report on Change Orders • March 29, 2022 — Passed motion to execute Change Order No. 38 BACKGROUND: Over the past three years, the City has been working with David Evans & Associates (Consultant) to develop and bring to fruition, the Barker Road/BNSF Railroad Grade Separation Project. In the first phase of the project, which began in 2017, the Consultant analyzed and compared six alternatives in terms of cost, right-of-way (ROW) needs, impacts to existing properties, constructability, safety, and other pertinent project elements, so the City could select the preferred alternative. In the second phase of the project, which began in 2018, the Consultant developed final design and construction documents for the project. The City and WSDOT recognized the benefits for WSDOT managing the construction and construction contract administration for the project. On June 30, 2020, Council passed a motion to execute the Interlocal Agreement between WSDOT and the City. The following are significant items contained within the Agreement as the project moves forward: • WSDOT is the lead agency in contracting and administering the Construction Contract. • WSDOT can issue change orders of $100,000 or less without the City's approval when cumulative change orders are less than $350,000. • Any single Change Order in excess of $100,000 require City review and approval. • The City will be part of WSDOT's Final Inspection and Project Acceptance procedures. • The City will have the sole discretion to issue a Letter of Acceptance to WSDOT at the final project closeout. Acceptance will not be given by the City until it is fully satisfied with the project. • The City will reimburse WSDOT for all costs associated with project construction and construction administration. WSDOT advertised the project on November 23, 2020, and awarded the project on January 28, 2021, to Max J. Kuney Company in the amount of $11,637,134.00, 83 percent of the engineer's estimate of $13,885,811.8. Construction started on March 8, 2021. The contractor has completed the road improvements on Trent Ave. (SR 290), including the roundabout. East and westbound traffic on Trent Ave. is in its final configuration. The south leg (Barker Rd) of the roundabout will be open when the bridge over the BNSF railroad is completed. Construction resumed in March 2022. WSDOT has been coordinating with staff on all change orders with Max J. Kuney Company regardless of their amounts. Currently, WSDOT has executed 22 change orders, including one Council -approved change order, that cumulate to $400,701.48. The attached Change Order No. 3 in the amount of $1,031,700.00 is the cost to import and compact 35,000 cubic yards of fill within the BNSF Railway right-of-way. The contractor's original source that met the contract requirements was not accepted by BNSF due to their environmental concerns of the source. The closest source approved by BNSF resulted in round trip truck haul times of over 2 hours. The amount of haul needed and the long -haul duration results in the need for 12 trucks and trailers making 5 round trips per day for a total of 34 days. The attached Change Order No. 7 in the amount of $37,882.00 is an increase to bid quantities for the concrete traffic islands at the roundabout. The original bid quantities were short 403 square yards from the actual contract amount needed that was shown in the plans. Page 2 of 3 After Change Orders 3 and 7s are executed, the new contract amount will be $13,107,417.48 which is 12.63% over the original contract. Staff will continue to work closely with WSDOT as they develop and review all change orders. All change orders that increase the amount of the contract will come before Council for approval as the $350,000 authorization limit has been reached. OPTIONS: 1) Authorize the City Manager to approve Change Order Numbers 3 and 7 with Max J. Kuney Company in the amount of $1,031,700.00 and $37,882.00 respectively, or 2) Take other appropriate action. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to authorize the City Manager to approve Change Order Numbers 3 and 7 with Max J. Kuney Company in the amount of $1,031,700 and $37,882.00 respectively. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: To date, the City has secured funding in excess of $26,000,000 for the Barker Road/BNSF Grade Separation Project from seven sources. All change orders between WSDOT and Max J. Kuney Company will be funded from the project funds and are grant eligible. STAFF CONTACT: Bill Helbig, PE, Community and Public Works Director ATTACHMENTS: Change Orders — Summary Change Order No. 3 Change Order No. 7 Page 3 of 3 RAB Completion Detour Signs Blockout Size Revision Roundabout Caution Signs Temporary Striping Long Duration (Minor Change) DRl-I Revisions CMP Material Revision SE Line Surveying Error CenturyLink Shoring . - { i IDT Line HMA added Bid Item Relocate Utility Line ` \/{ »`} f `2 \ Undocumented Fill Excavation Overhead Barker Special WZTC Sign Concrete Island Quantity Revisions Additional Stripe Removal Undocumented Fill Exploration & Overhead Remove Structure & Obstruction Overhead BNSF Material Requirements -Hatch Road Source Common Bonow Measurement Revision \ % \ 5, I. ) _ \ (/ Q p ! g , }2. i! $ 4,076.00 $ 9,139.80 $ 4,000.00 $ 150,000.00 $ 44,400.00 $ 342.97 WSDOT Executed Change Orders ,0__,0__ __,0,==e= - t, 0_ {/ tj Extended overhead costs (35 days) in order to open Trent and the roundabout to traffic in 2021. Additional traffic control signs needed to detour traffic for the Trent Ave eastbound closure. No cost change order to revise the utility block out details at the end wall and piers (Additional permanent truck wnming signs at the roundabout requested by WSDOT Traffic. Install temporary paint pavement markings instead of plastic in order to open Trent and the roundabout to track in 2021. Minor drainage changes, anticipate minor credit Credit for material substitution on drainage pipe. Additional surveying required due to plan error. To maintain access to the existing CenturyLink vault using shoring until the vault can be abandoned after the bridge is constructed. This allowed for the till of the roundabout to continue while the bridge was delayed. No cost change order to allow more recycled concrete materials to be used in the common borrow (except BNSF property). No cost change order to substitute a different gradation mix of asphalt for the detour road. Relocated CenturyLink fiber optic line that was in conflict with improvements. Line is within an existing easement end was not where original design locates showed. Additional fill material and compaction needed to fill in the unsuitable material excavation on the acquired Cassell property. Sign cdtropic control Sign changeshanges nneeeededed for for tropic control Extended overhead cost (12 days) for the excavation work to remove the unsuitable material from the acquired Cassell property. Sign changes needed for traffic control Additional concrete quantities for roundabout islands. Original bid quantities did not cover all the contract work shown in the plans. Work to remove additional existing pavement markings. Extended overhead cost (1 day) and exploratory work to determine the limits of the unsuitable buried material located on the acquired Cassell property. Material was buried by the previous property owner and was unknown. Extended overhead costs (5 days) to deal with removal of discovered buried concrete and metal structures located on the acquired Highland Estates property. Slmctures were unknown. Contract included the standard WSDOT specifications for Common Borrow (fill material). The contractor's material source met WSDOT specifications, but was rejected byl3NSF and could not be used within the BNSF property portion of the project. Approximately 35,000 CY is needed within the BNSF property. The closest source allowed by BNSF, substantially increases the hauling operation (approx. 5 times bnger duration). The material is also sandy materiel which changes the compaction efforts needed for the material. INo cost change order that revises the measurement method of Common Bonow (BI ff18) Remarks/Status No cost change order to substitute a different gradation mix of asphalt CGO2v04(revised Feb 2005) :paaTnbad aancuuSTs aaauz5ug q.aaCoa titi00 op cl HH�1H H H CI 0 -HH� LTJ tf] C 00n On nzz0 0ZHZ H ,2 ZH0 H HZOqq HH 1-3 LHH•• H Cn 'j 0 HZ U Z n•• G� t17 H H H W H N H wow01 OOW ui ) HHQ CO H H CO O CO W N O N rA O O O O CO O CO CD 0 0 LQ O CD n O- - D k< O t �LQ H- < 0 O G n W n n c* c* o o n m 0 0 r-h Cn O n O 0 0 F-h O Cn w w ✓ t Cn (P n rh n w c* O n n n H�7H�7 tnn OHH Z C7 H L7H0 hH•• LH CDIOH N:n] 0o HO 2Z� Z 0 d t7�>• �t7 14. tHCn q �xZ tb tli 0 Cn1-c 0� Hn H 0 trj H X X0 hi tliz HCn Cn hi I 0fti � o 8000-OZZ66 ntH q0 H U Fc I X0 ny • • H 0 Li Z (500)EZTT7 tj hi nXa> rHH 0 Z t700 0�00 ZHZ rn Z H Cn bH O1-3 Z H 0 ,Q F.mHx n CO n 1-1,-ci 1-h rrCDCdn H-Ocn mH R' 0U0n 0tti O O H-rr0-w 0 w 0 (D rhn 0 w O-'0 0 0 F-' hCi 0 0 O-' CD 0 rr(D O O H, w n 0 0 (D c-r m c-r < m Fi 0 Ft rr m H- cn 0 P F- rr H- H- (D rr Ft O-' 1-' 0 0 (D n n rr m '� rr ct'-ci m - 'TJ m n H- F- F- m (D m m LQ m w rr n 0' m Ft 0 H- O-' m Ft Ft Cd rr 5S 1-0 w N H 0 x 11 Ft rr Ft 0 (D 0 H- w'-Ci 0 H- m tli H m Ft m H- z rr H hj m 0 It 17s w rr (D w 0 n rt 1i H- 0 w w n 0 H- rr w m 0-' O Ft F- F- rr H- O-' m Ft 0 rr kC rr Q F-rr0 m F-0 C m mkC 0 F'i WO n w n w w n 0 w k H-O td H-m m (Dnw m m H-P0 C rr0rr 'C(1) m m0-' m0rr01-'0 00 O Ft LC) w R. 0 E m 11 H- m w m O Ft H- 0 rr rr Q, Ft O w Ft 0 rr rhH-n rrn n H- P.) 017, 1-,O-'1-'0'1-1 H-rr0 trrr H- H-w m 1-I n w w ctCO H-I-'F- p H- w w 0 m\0 (D w n n O O 0 0 Nn w F-' p, (D 0 0 w F- < rr H- F-' tr 1-"-0 tt7 LC) H- H- w WO (D m 1 0 'P (D - Ft rr (D . m F-'),G F-' (D (D x x1 H- (D Z Z Z rr rr p, H- (D 0 w 0 0 H, rr Ft m tr 0 n 5S'0 M 0 m 0 0 0 cn,-C "< 0 Ft G rr H-H, L ort w 0 m 0 a(D w ctct0 tYtd ctn 0.-Q n N n LC) n m (D1-'n • w H0 mhc3 O-'$ rr w O-' P.) (D Z(D"C w n O n w (D H ct0 (D 11 0 wn w w Err(D I-'(Drr rpm-. CrrF'- (D1-1 NNN<w w rr0OH-w ^rr m I--' F-' ,X H- h H- w 'Tj rr w 1-j w (D o o o (D tr tr (D rr Ft w 1-' H- o rr rr w F-' w rr (D F'- U n C hCi o rr xl (D m o 0 o F- 1-.0 m 1-' p, rr tP 0 G O-' w ''C rr O-' w (D O (D 17, )" rr 1-; 0 0 (D tr 0 (D 0 rr o o \ 0-' -- 0 tr (D • H- DF 0n rr (D a 01,(DH-wO0 a� trtr ��0om n tr p.. tr H- 0' m rr 1'1rt w C 0 Hi H- rr (D 0 (D w (D n O 0 H- w (D'Z3 (D rr w rr (D Ft U H- Ft co H- (D 1-' 1-1 rr O n F' w w "C n tr H F-' F-' 0 m n (D p.. (D (D H- rr (D rr H- 0 n O-' H- rr O LC) rr P.) n k< H- rr 0 rr (Drr 1- 'z3 rr 0-' O'LQ 'b E 0 0 n H- p,LQ n n 0 N (D m H- 0 0 H-trn w H- CD 0-' (D •• E R' 0 (D Ft O-' R'E rrw (D m H-0 rrn wkc (D 1-I H-0 0 rr rr n 0 m m m rr rr trLQ 1-' rr m rr -'• HQ n w m (D (D rr H- H- H, co Cd 0 rr En (D Dr N (D Pi� rr tr O O 0 1-t0 0Few 0O-'1-hZC (D(DO-' F1 0• 1 ct tn(D1-'0rrw H2O ttiH- LC) H- co Ft w Ft )H-0 k (D w 1-11 C H ct m xn (D O (D a. 1-I 0 w rr • rr F-' 0 'al 0 rr73 1-0 0 H 11 H F'- (DnLQ1-'0 p, 1-11-' LQ o1-' 'ti1-j 1 Nb H- Ow N Em (D F'-` (D F'- (D ht, 0 1-I H- 11 (D w w w F- w .� 0 Or 0 0 n C 'z3 w Ft rr H, rr 0 ,Q tow m H' H rr 0 F,- O P.) w (D H- x H, (D H-1-1 H- 0-' (D H- C O ui m m o,� n 1-1 n n pm(D1-hw n (D0U0(DttiPrr wm eYv Ft rr rr rr G� (D 1-j n m 1-' m 0 'FY W H- w (D • 0• 0n 0-(DH-hcs moo rr LC) w Ew0H- (D (D (D 0' (D Q, p w rr 0 1-' H, 0 0 (D F- w (D 1-' F'- CO CO O (D m (D n 0 H-0 H,H, H,p, F-' H-• n rr � H P d n tr rr F-'LQ p+(Q H, w (D O-' (D 0 0 -< rr H- • ''< 0 rr rr tr 0-' H E Ft F, 1-' p+ (D p+ w 0 `.r (D H, O-'k< (D rr O-' w (D 1-' O N R' rr rr (D 0 'ti 11 (D (D m • m m (D n rr n Fi O-' rr o U) (D rr rr rr m rr n w 00wm w(D n 1-I0i-Q0-'tb Ll7O-' xH (D00 rr 000 n (D0rrH-O(DZ 0(D It 0 HO-'w" 1-h0 (D n rr pa. O rr CO11 H, H-I-. H- m LQ 1-' O (D cr m R. 0 n rt N- z rr 0 n tb fti H- n w m (D n p.. H- • w(Dn 0m H-ZLQH-(DZ 00 0) m 1-z31-I0(Dco 0hciQ <(D LQn7 1-11w• tI) (D0 r 0 �oww°F'm`t p F. rr n " H- rr '7, m n7 n (D rr 0 \mow �1-h nO 00 0 Ft Ft Ftzn owi-'.. rrO P.) rr n < n LQ o w 1-j Ft Ct''LS''LS w O \ H. Ht • ct (D H, p+ (D w F- (D Ft rr w rr m Ft (D n t-'> rr .i H- m n 1'j (D '.- rr (D 0 N- F. (D 0 n rr m k< 0 n O-' O-' H-LQ rr w rrw(Dw nH- 0 R'wht,rr 0 m H-ww0n n ''',< 1-t k< 0 d 0 (D < n m H 0 rr F' rt G w rr (D (D rr . . 1-0 m O ca. n 1-0 F. n m 0 O (D O-' 0 H- m 0 rr m ca. rr 0 O (D rr 0 k (D m H- Ft 0 0 rr trkc O-' rr (D H- H- p w F- (D n rr p rr H,G 0 (DN w .r k 0 0 0 F-w w 1-I rr w w w Ft n H- 0 1-t I -' m 0 P Cr" rr I-; m O rr C n H- F-' 0 Ft n td w rr F- m (D (D i-Q P.) (D 17, O LC) (D '-Ci 0-' X n 0 1-1 0 O rr I-' rr w •• p, w m U)17, (D 1"1 F-' P- 0 n H- 11 H- ''"T' F'- (D H- m rr ryj 1"t (D m 0 w 11 m rr w 0 0 H-^ 0 m rr w F- (D (Dw00 LC) H- OU C w rr rr ww0• CO m p, F-' '0 Z (D H-F'- 0-' 1 -' F'-k< (D • rr d R' p n (D F- 0 0 U) '� rr F rr Fl] m 0 0 m from the Hatch Road source shall m w Hx n w nit m H,trw HU O 0-'w O Cd n 0 F-' E w 0 0 (D R'O-'(D a (D rr 0 0 (D O w w rr G Ft R, H- m m ctFi rrp 1-I n 1-I 73 m m n Xnn nnnn ca. n(DF. Ft O (DH- 00(Dwtn (D wnnH- 1--'1Q w FEE C n '7 w rid n 0 O-'-ci n O 1-' H-c-r (D O w w (D w rr ''H-m bmm m O w 1-h0 R' 0 P- H- n F- H- (D ro rr G pi rr O LQ 0 pm wrrp,F.m 0 (D OO(DO LC)0 (D w rrm Ft m 0 O 0 m �m rhO rrcrtc-r0 1-1 H,ct wn m 01-IO-' O-'np. rr mm m �mn0n0n • 1 (DwmErr 1-'rr01z3z w CD ¢' 0m OoF-tn�r�t¢ rr n na1 H • • nn£o rr w tb 0' H- w (D ht, N 0 H- H- 0 H- rr 'Z O m w 11 H. m H. 0' v) CD 1-11 0� mo((DDin 0rtn1p.) w OD 0' moo nw0 kcxn ¢ 0 w(Dcr w tb 0 rr (D n '7, O-' r O 0)r 4Q m N 0 0 1-h H- I-'H-H-n O Ftct 0ct(DmLC) O-'H- Gm 01-t0-'N 00-'rr O-' Ft n w ▪ 0E0o H-fDfD i 0 (D1~-' Pim1QV mwwm�R0 P.) ((DD rr I'H.p,H-E m O1 h mmwH 0o0- F''<GH, F. W 0w LQ(D 1-10 kC H 1-h w n H- n Ft rr n ^ R. 0 (D n 0 (D H, O-' hi1-'Ol 'J-''LS m (D n H- O Il' No G (D m n F-^ ▪ Ow00 *wn i H-0 rr LC) 0 H, H, (D c-r'� H- n 1"1 0' R'H- w 0 H-rr CD Hb0'0 E0F'tH- H-o (�D N� m O rr w-h 0 0 CD 0m ' H 0 Hm w rr QO�F Ot to N0 a. H m n rrH-[50S WWnH0 m00(DD i 0 N ro npc-r trwn n o ff 0' p, Ft x F-' W rr wn a� 0 rt-Or mIn0- O w(D^ LC) H- nwXLC) LC) F-h Ft CC (D 0 w .'Y p+ b (D H, • H Ht L.J. m H- 0 Z1 H 0 O 0 0 1-t0ct0mrnH- 10 bFh p, H,'FT'w rrl01-' • P.) m m a -., (D LC) N 11 (I) n (D to 0 rr o rr 0 'SuzzzZz4a0,3 This contract is revised as follows: H- ct C 0 CD ca.0 w n � aw ct (D 0D N- n w H- F- H m rr N-� 0 m(D w 0 Q• rr H- m �rr 0 O ▪ (D H- _ mo 0n m n 0 H,-1 1-1 O p rr n CDn ctN- 0 rr o • (D EZ9600:ON .LDFTdLNOO d t7 1-3 n� y �00 Oro dHZ H my 0 z H 0 tr CD = xi H= xi n= 0-'73 W= b rr H'- P,_ X rn n H m M H n -- m —CD H H —Ca n m m m 0 0 x tr [ m rr 0 R..hc3 01-Q O 0 0 1 O 0 0 0 W n 0 OW 0 W OCD 00 0' CD 0 0 i0 mW bW tits' �0 bH WM MM HhO HW < Hn Hh(D n n 0 0 1-' W 0 0 W m 0 0 CD P O H- k< O W 0 CD n CD ct n hc3 0 0 0 I-' H- n 0, m 0 rr CD n CD n m rr 0 0 W Hn 0 n N- w n ca.k.ow P rr w N-c3 w m W w m n z3 ct W o W "C n H MM m ct ct m o n O p z3 n ct N z3 O73 m H P.) CD CD nW 0 nWM H NO n � 0W G� mN H-H-�m k CD���CD H H-m rn7J m ti 0 n,Q x E n F'Hn (D n W On Hp O U m (D 0 m W 0 �0 0 N-m n n m CD CD Ht CD n 0 0 Hh LQ H'- 0 W rr 0 0 �' - fD • rr m 00 b H t5' n CD n m O rr 0 0 m LQ p LQ m W rr xi W 0 Hi 0, rr 0 0 W 1Q 0 Hn 0 0 or 0 H- rr n n W CD CD m 0 CD IC 00 nLQ H Cr..-' i rt n n 0-'O c 1-tm CD '0 rr Hn n O x n n• trLQ I-0 n p c* Hn m p, H rr G W Si) �'-c3 0 1-' - N- 0 is O 0 OD n -< CD W W'z3 0 0 W• CD r ct n n W n 0 W rt Hn p M 1 n 0 m 0 GO W CD rt n CD E Hn I TJ p, ct 1-' G m n H- 0-' CD rr CD 1 -' O n c-r CD N- W H'- rr C 0 0 n EnCD P, 1 -' 0 0 (D Lc)o (D W Hh n H'- CD rr P.)• • W W n CD W n W 0 n 0-' 0 m n Hn n 0 CD w P m H'- 0 CD W 0 n Z LC) 0 rr N Fj O O m O ct ct H ct W �' 0-' 0 tr 0 CD rr 0 CD Hh F' H • �- E n O O n CD CD tr ts' • rr LC) n 0 O 0 H- 0-' H 0-' H- P,(1 P m H' 0 0'c $ W Ht H- 0 0 w G 'd H. rt LQ 0 CD ts' W Ht W CD CD W H- (D rr 0 0 CD rr -- CD 0 0 H- rr n • m rr p.. CD n 0 O m t CD "< n -' W k< CO H- rr H. ,- H. ct rt rt m 0 0 CD 0 0 m0,1-O 0 Wart G ntr� rr0 rr(D OH- 0 n H- 0 cn c N0On CD O Ul H ct orr CD mmrt H. 73 0 W En Gn- mPi W ct m WLQ O rE h �oH O� W n0-' n O - N n CD n CD P.) O Nn ct 4 r H- rr Hr, LQ� O�P.) ct ct N- W W W i W ct 0 m r-1 CDrt(Do nmo ct N n trnnh m W nrtr Oct CD 0-' P, CD 0 Oct H kC H O c 00 CD rr rr n rnw m 0 rrmp H-p - m H D H m p 0 m LQ n n CD r �mOn ncup, o73m o� H- 0 .CD x0OO r 0-111h P,DWn VQn P.) Hp NOrh AW 73 n co 0, N n CDhc3 P.) P.) H- EnnmpCDCD 0 dDct iH O HO 0 ZG �n H Hnm �O Hx n m En Pi ct �p G W ��N- rnmcrm rr m n P.) Pi m H- P, H N Cd n n o ff O W n - - n W H LQ z3 p W z3 0'n7 n CD 1-1 tr M hci X Hh CD CD O 0 n $ H rr (D - — 'z3 p, 1-'LC) rt O E 0 CD P, Pi x CD CD W Pi n W n ts'O x �otr (D n Pi 1-' O H O n W n n 5S ct(D W W Q ct �O ct O n CD n W n W CD p n H- CD W H� n W rrH'-H I- n CD rr m rt N W CD H Q O rr � e rr n rr CD 5S 0 p r h H W O H'- CD m H'- s' 0, n s H- 0 H- rr rt 0 0 E 0-'LQ n 0 -VI- CD x1 W N CD H' G 5S n E rr H p rr CD 0-' 0 CD'z3 0 I-' H- rrLQ H'- = CD CD H'- tr (A) 0, 0 U] 0 n (� rt (D 0 rt H'- H'- 0, m = n rr Di 0-' '-0 N m H Din ct O H p O O H ct 0 Hti(D OOH OW HO n�o Ep H- Di ON H'-0` 5S nW0LQm W Hh0 W = CD 1-, n n73 0 H Orr 0,0 m n n W p P, 0 W LC) LC) rr tr p, n N CO p, G Pi p CD W "C rr O CD LC) O H m W rr Nit-,00 n p H kC 0 0 rr r CD n p W LQ ts' 0 rr G CD C n rt o Z r h m ct o ct z3 H G m z3 r n r h n W N i 0 OP, CD W 0-'H-Nim 0 rr Ci 0-' CD 0 Hh rt''LS 0 n rr rr H'- 0 GO p H rr CD P.) ct GO H CD p ct LC) H n7 ct 00-'0 ((DM WE nrt0m Q i 0 mom' �0 0 �x 00P,CDH- rrts' n CD n rt n rt 'z3 n 'z3 CD H- 0 0 n 0 CD 0 x p, Pi rt m 0,0 ts' rr ,11 CD n n x 0 n CD rr 173 W O P, CD n 0 0 W rr rr rt rr H 0 CD H W CD rr 0 W H- CD n m PA, ON 0 p, 0 Hh Hh Cd rr W 0-' n 0 W 0 N 0 OD H- CD rt E rr 0'-0 rr rr 0 H- H- 0, 0 W E W 0 0 n 0 (D E H CD"' (D r-h N H. Di Di = n n I-. Di '< is n 0 m rr Hi = O0 1-'1-1 ts'W HrrCD Di 5S 0n alr m Hn.• ts'HCD n • CD, CD LC) Hhts' n P,0 0 P, H'n H Hi 1 N rt F-' H- w0 W 0-n CD O H G r O Pi � H CD H N N H rrH nW H-C 00 O H- H p, GH OWCI) 1-.H-pi H- OHh Grrn nN nW 0Wn00 W H-rrH' mWoW0 En H-hc3 P, CD O rr'< P, 0 n W 0 rr p rr W k< k mkc ts' H' 0 H' 0 0, m 0 0, 0 H- n 0 H 1C rr CD $ n PAC) 0-' rr CD H n rr tr 0 CD n LC) $ CCDH'- 0 m 0 0"' N CD LC) H--H-- 1-1 00 0 P, CD n 1 -' rr P.) 0-''� rrCd ' CD 0' 0 • • 'z3 W CD W W rr 0 Pi m En P.) H- 0 C CD CD n x CD 0 H, 0 0-' 0 0 CD W p p m LQ H- n ort< 0(Dnm Wtr W n nWW nW G W LQn rtH'-LQN nrtN�O 0 n N G CD CD I CD rr rr x O C Hi rr 1-1c r rt H n W CD rr O ''''Cl) p 0 n p nz3 �'N-W H-r-hn CD 0 CD w H n H' CD rrrr W m r'Hh n H-H'n ts'n CD 0 rr'-CS rn H-ts'W E p, 0 0 o w to o, w (D H'-W 0 0 W 0 W Hh0 M 0 (DOWo Wo LQnm on Entr off nary p0no LQ C 0-' CD rr 1-10 CD ' 0 1-1x1 G Hh tS' o to too 0 0 o n CD 0 0 p, p O n m CD O m P.) H'- Ho-ci tr m n o n n W o 0 0 0 o (D CD 0-'-- rr n7 rr P.) CD rrp, CD CD 0 �1W --0 W CD 0 m ,Q W W W n 0 W HW m Hh H' CD N H- CD 0, 0 W n 0 rr H 0 p, p, CD 0'z3 m H' • H C to rr hc3 W H p O p (-1rr p H z3 H n a) N rrn H-ho i 0P0 3 rr tF mHn w(DCD-c30 o H- F-' OM N- n rr 0 '-'0 W CD ts' 0 H- H- ct MO- o, I-0 i I- Di Ht O O F CDm I- G 1-1CDCD0 rt P, CD ko'ZS GO rr CD HH'-tr rrHI 0 0Hn H LQ0, EW CD 0z01-1 N rr 0 H'- m 0 rr W 0 0 0, 0, x rr r-h G �] rt m rr W n N H 1 (D ct• ct rt rt H'- 0 W Pi 0" m W r h m C W Ij rr < O rr N- n rn CD n W �C rr m m rr O N H p - n Hnm• N m rr m o n n n m n m n p H kC �m m H-H-n F' H k< nHh prr LQm W rrct 0x0 x W H W0 H'--' mn rr NN-HW (-0 W P.)W H' Hh rr I-t CD (D ct G-1-,H-H, (D (D rr rr I. I-' O F-'- 0 LC) ',� H �"t F-' n n� W 1-1 O CD W (D ct CD tr O H'- 0� 0 0n a `r0 P, P,m((DD P, n kH EZ9600:ON LDFTdLNOO t�7 nX� �HH t0c) TJ H 0HZ b1-3 OI 1-3 H 0 1-3 ts7 ts7 0 to H 0OD r-h � H N w IA ZnI-c3mp i[c-rnHn = n '-'0 (i)Onrr0E- 000(] 0-' (D n U0 0 0 r*I-0 H-0 n 0 w --' Orr -- n 0 l- c-r w p O H- H rt (D r I--, 1-1 (D rt Si) LQ • 0 0 n 73 H- (D hc3 r* 0 I-, H 0D 0,t4 CD I-' . i-- H .'< Q.)~ ~ W 0 (D U PH- rr 0 rr rr N H, n n w nG (D(Din(D 0wH, a Om �fDcr`�am�rr won n H, (D rr w rr rr (D n w 000H1H1 a.• n CD �'-cs«00x 0 (D �' m I"t l-1 w H, (D a w (D 0 rr I-1,Q rr • 0 H- 0hci rr n 0 G n HiF-rr l-,trw .�.� H-0 rt H-"< (D 'z3 I-. O H,n I-. 7rr • I-1 0 (D H- CD I-, 0 0 X O 5SNpw(DO Si) hci n w rr p, rr tr. O wwrr 't xN "Crrn<H-n trw w '-'rrw0(Dm0rrw� rn(DH-rrpc4Gnn a • OH- Si) na • ww°aH-E� hi 0 rrON H-rt Own I-1 QH, mp(DEn wrrrr CD 0 0 `Q CD rt -tS O w w H-rt (D trH-I-. (D 0 rr pA} H- 0 w (D CD w n H- (D H, I-1 I-. CD 10 -°0�'0 co rb ` rr w >✓ E H, H- H, H- 0 rr p, rr 0 1-. O rrww n n) 0- En I-(D n man�a(DH- rr a rr _ (D (D H- a (D O rr I't rr Si) n w I't H- I-. n (D (D G N- Prr w w I- Si) 1-1 I-' rr0H- CD H- H-LC) Cd H- H- a N rC3 n n w w 0-• o En o H- 0-' 0rrI-10 l't 0hci0m Si) F' m rt n nLQ 0 O 'z3m nrr000 w 0H,w0 - iH,<Hi O 0 H-0 N- 0 H-0 In (D a 'z3 Cn to rr p, 1-1 a) O wa.. 0hcs00 H- n rr p H-0 (D rr w a H-H-i 0 n 0 LQ -'H CD ▪ 0 no�(nDPCDwO~ • H(Dnw (D (D rrtr • m rt 0 H- 1-1 hc3I-1 (D i-.En0aON 00w I-. Q.) n r-h I-1 H,H, w'crr G0rrwNN O 0 a'c trn p, rr H- (D I-. Pi to co(Drr • H, (D a N- "C (D H, tr rr N- 0 n rr • working days is not affected by this EZ9600:ON .LDFTdLNOO 0 0 0 H O H O W H H 0 H o C O O O HH HH HH HH HH HH HH HH HH HH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH HH HH HH HH OH OH OH OH WM WM WM WM WM WM WM WM WM WM Oltfj OlM WM WM Htij Hti Hti Htij OJ X OJ X w X w X N X N X H X H X O ,X O ,X l0 X l0 X W X W X w l0 X co T OD U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U lu U on on on on QM QM QM QM QM QM QM QM QM QM on on on on yam wm ,am wm ,am wm ,am wm ,am wm ,am wm ,am wm yam wm ,am wm n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H ro ro 'GI b 'GI 'GI b 'GI 'GI 'GI -ro -ro -ro -ro Oro Ob Oro Oro H H H IA H H H H H H <H <H OH OH al.H al.H al.H al.H H H H H H H H H H H W H W H HH HH - H - H OH OH O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OO OO OJO OJO OO OO 010 010 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. C = C = U = U = ti = ti = C = C = C = C = nhj nftj xZ Z nti nti nn nn •0 OO000000 C>>HttXXmm0 FCCFCCHHmmmmt CM H 1-C1-CFCFC • w • w w w • w • w • w • w • w • w n n C C ti7 C ti7 • x • x H H H H 0 TJ n7 t7 t7 n n z z O z CO H H 0 m z z H H H H H H n n x x H H n n n n x x x • 0 0 C C 0 0 O • O 0 0 Z Z b him m ro ro H H H H 0 › HI HI U1 n U1 n X X n n xi xi xi xi H O H N O W O in tfj wm H H o Ho N O N O l0 O W Ol W x O ,x O O 'z H H C. C . C . C . Z . Z . X N X N H N H 0 0 W O N N `P tfj Olti wH U1H NO OO O O H H w ,x O.X- Oft] Oft] on on H n on N Z H'L", O O N N H H WO <O OO OO OC OC cod �x al. w O O to to al. al. Oq Oq � � OOOZ OZ o o H Ol0 NO o 0 0 0 0 o NC NC o o o o off off tnH Poo- • off rnZ �Z O O O O O O O O C C IOU HrIgVUdOd IOU agEVUxOd OxdOH UVOE OxdOH UVOE 'ZONI MOEdOH H H H H U'1 OD U'1 CO N W W O W O H H CO H OD W CO W H H Ol OD H H H H H H H H N OD l0 O l0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O H H 1I1 1I1 i i H H W W H O H N W W W Ol - Ol CO H W W W O W Ol W O iA W W W W N W W CO O N Ol al Ol W U1 N O < W N - W H O W W O O O O O H O N H O O U1 U1 U1 N CO O W - O O O O OD - al. W O O O O Ol O - Ol O O O O O O H < dl N O O O O O O CO O O O O O O O U1 O d W O O O O O O O O 'Z=NI MOEdOH H ZH Ot ZZ 00 b 2OIxa LINn EZ9600:ON IDV LNOO d tfj nX� r CD HH tfj0G0 n7 H ZHZ bH 0 I: z H H 0 Zucoy aapao abuuuo T Toy aogouaquoo gVIEHLVW CIE HDJVH Hr o wtj to o co 0 H xl ro 0 HHooy O O O O H W W H H 0 H O lO CO noon H H i•11. �110 ND N U1 N H H noon 0000 it It It It W W W W LIJ • n• X nxnz roo droo • n• o ZtZC"iH H OH tj n nn �rb rb OH H EZ9600: oN IDVWLNoo 0 O H 0 t7 ro HZ nX Hrn G� z LTJ0c) 0�0 MHz bH O t7 z H H 0 H tfj tfj 0 to rn \ H O OD rh\ H W +4 -4 2060 2050 ROADIVAY SECTION H ROADWAY _EXCAVATION _SEE SHEET _RP11 ROADWAY VATIQN_2113 C Y EMBANKMENT COMPACTION SEE SHEET RP CLEARING AND GRUBBING SEE SHEET RP11 EMBANKMENT COMPACTION 13500 CLEARING AN GRUBBING 1.0 ACRE BA LINE 00% LT & 280' VC - VPI 84400.00 EL 2046.03 RT FINISHED EXISTING GRADE GROUND C9623 CO #3 Page 7 of 13 Hatched Area = Bridge Approach Embankment 95% of Maximum Density (See Section 2-03.3(14)1) Hatch Road Borrow Quantity (Shaded Area) 84+00 05+00 86+01 87+00 FILE NAME c:IpwworkIngldealdrns000361XL0143 PR RD 012.dgn TIME 10:32:13 PM DATE 1115/2020 PLOTTED BY MROUGH DESIGNED BY K MELBY ENTERED BY K MELBY CHECKED BY B KIRKMAN PROJ. ENGR. M ALLEN REGIONAL ADM. M GRIBNER DESCRIPTION Jo. uuNeEF 20Z009 FED.AID PROJ.NO. REP-HLP-TIG ERIX-4123)005) TECATTAL Spokane, WA 2020.11.06 14:30:23-06'00' DATE DAVID EVANS p .n.AS.oCIAT.enn. I-y •I/ Washington State Department of Transportation 00+00 SR290/BARKER ROAD BNSF GRADE SEPARATION SPOKANE COUNTY - MP 12.5 207 2060 2050 89.00 Plol 1 PLAN ND RP12 ROADWAY PROFILES SHEET 59 250 SHEETS +4 0 2083 2077 2076 2060 2059 2053 2047 2 ROADWAY SECTION I ROADWAY EMBANKMENT COMPACTION SEE SHEET RP12 CLEARING AND GRUBEING SEE SHEET 012 EXCAVATION SEE SHEET RP12 SEE BRIDGE PLANS BA LINE -2.00 Hatched Area = Bridge Approach Embankment 95% of Maximum Density (See Section 2-03.3(14)1) 8 +0 LT 8 RT Hatch Road Borrow Quantity (Shaded Area) ROADWAY SECTION J ROADWAY SECTION 0 ROADWAY EXCAVATION 620 C.Y EMBANKM0NT COMPACTION- 47900 C.Y CLEARING AND GRUBBING 0.3 ACRE +3 _J BA LINE -2.00% LT RT 10 . BA LINE mo Iz= O K C9623 CO #3 Page 8 of 13 Hatch Road Borrow Quantity (Shaded Area) Hatched Area = Bridge Approach Embankment 95% of Maximum Density (See Section 2-03.3(14)1) 91+00 92+00 +11 94+00 083 2077 2076 2060 2059 2053 2047 FILE NAME TIME c:lpwworkl gldealdms006361XL0143 PR RD 013.dgn 10:32:17 PM DATE 1115/2020 PLOTTED BY MROUGH DESIGNED BY K MELBY ENTERED BY K MELBY CHECKED BY B KIRKMAN Bridge Approach Embankment 95% of Maximum Density (See Section 2-03.3(14)1) �� FED.AID PROJ.NO. PROJ. ENGR. M ALLEN REGIONAL ADM. M GRIBNER DESCRIPTION DATE r0Z009 REP-HLP-TIG ERIX-4123)005) OTTE DAVID EVANS p msAas0DIAT.eiw. I-y Washington State Department of Transportation SR29D/BARKER ROAD BNSF GRADE SEPARATION SPOKANE COUNTY - MP 12.5 Plol 1 RP1 3 ROADWAY PROFILES SHEET 60 250 SHEETS +4 2080 2070 ROADWAY SECTION K ROADWAY SECTION C &OADWAY_EXCAVAIIOK1 SEE _SHEET _RP73 EMBANKMENT COMPACTION SEE SHEET RPt3 CLEARING AND GRUBBING SEE SHEET RP/3 C9623 CO #3 Page 9 of 13 ROUNDABOUT CONTROL FILE NAME 4:1 w Hatch Road Borrow Quantity (Shaded) 60' VC U ID 2.00% SEE ROUNDABOUT PROIFILES Approx. location of temporary fill slope. DABOUT FINISHED GRA E Hatched Area = Bridge Approach Embankment 95% of Maximum Density (See Section 2-03.3(14)1) EXISTING GROUND ,O1 94+00 95+00 t/Q 1 11V 10 1 , t 1 1 1.1 96+00 97+00 TIME DATE 0:32:22 PM 11/5/2020 PLOTTED BY MROUGH 10 WASH DESIGNED BY K MELBY ENTERED BY K MELBV JOB HUMBER 20Z009 FED.AID PROJ.NO. REP-H LP-T I G E R IX-412 3(005) CHECKED BY B KIRKMAN PROD. ENGR. M ALLEN REGIONAL ADM. M GRIBNER DESCRIPTION DATE N CONTRACT NO Spokane, WA 2020.11.0G 1436:13-00'00' DATE P.E. STA ME BOX DAVID EVANB 0 .e.ABBOCIAT.S, .. I-y v7ir Washington State Department of Transportation SR290IBARKER ROAD BNSF GRADE SEPARATION SPOKANE COUNTY - MP 12.5 2080 2070 Plot 1 RP14 ROADWAY PROFILES 61, 25U Site Plan - Hatch Road Borrow Site Access Notes 1. Contractor shall use existing construction entrance on SB US 395 on -ramp. The cable gate shall be closed when not in use. 2. No existing limited access fencing will be removed or modified. 3. This traffic control plan shall be used only between the hours of 6 AM to 8 AM, Monday -Friday. Limited Access Fence (existing) HMA Construction Entrance and Cable Gate (Existing) Temporary 30' Access Break (US 395 MP 168.89) Area to be excavated US 395 US 395 CO #3 Page 10 of 13 FILE NAME TIME 0952 DATE 8118/2021 STATE PLOTTED BY CORLEPK WASH DESIGNED BY ENTERED BY JOB N MEIN FED.AID PROJ.NO. CHECKED BY PROJ. ENGR. REGIONAL ADM. REVISION DATE BY CONTRACT NO. DATE P., STAMP BOX DATE Washington State Department of Transportation SR290IBARKER ROAD BNSF GRADE SEPARATION SPOKANE COUNTY - MP 12.5 Plot 1 FLAN REF NO BORROW SITE ACCESS SHEET OF SHEETS Temporary Access and Construction Entrance Traffic Control Plan - Hatch Road Borrow Site Access OB FED.AID PROJ.NO. Notes 1. All temporary traffic control signs shall be Class B 2. Contractor haul traffic shall yield to on ramp traffic. 3. This traffic control plan shall be used between the hours of 6 AM to 8 AM, Monday -Friday. The Engineer may restrict allowed haul hours if operation interferes with traffic. Washington State Department of Transportation C9623 CO #3 Page 11 of 13 SR290/BARKER ROAD BNSF GRADE SEPARATION SPOKANE COUNTY - MP 12.5 BORROW SITE -TCP LEGEND Existing Edge of Pavement Existing Edge Line Existing Guardrail Closed to Traffic Temporary Center Line Temporary Edge Line Temporary Edge of Pavement Temporary Conc. Barrier Sign Existing Alignment Channelizing Devices Type 3 Barricade Work Area Existing Sign Notes 1. All temporary traffic control signs shall be Class B 2. This traffic control plan shall be used outside the hours of 6 AM to 8 AM, Monday -Friday. The Engineer may restrict allowed haul hours if operation interferes with traffic. MINIMUM TAPER LENGTH = L (feet) LANE WIDTH (feet) 10 11 12 Posted Speed (mph) 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 105 150 205 270 450 500 550 - - - 115 165 225 295 495 550 605 660 - — 125 180 245 320 540 600 660 720 780 840 T.27N.R.43E.W.M. SPOKANE COUNTY WANDERMERE ROAD HATCH BORROW SITE - ACCESS CLASS B SIGNS 0 100 200 SCALE IN FEET C9623 CO #3 Page 12 of 13 MI CHANNELIZING DEVICE SPACING (FEET) MPH TAPER TANGENT 50/70 40 80 35/45 30 60 25/30 20 40 FILE NAME G:IC9623 Barker Rd BNSF G ade SeparatlontTrafalc Cont ol1C9623_PS_TC_HATCH_Access_DS.dgn TIME 748:45 AM DATE 1/25/2022 STATE PLOTTED BY allenmv 10 WASH DESIGNED BY R. LYNN ENTERED BY D. Shatluck JOB NUBBEIR FED.AID PROJ.NO. CHECKED BY R. McNamara PROJ. ENGR. M. Allen, P.E. REGIONAL ADM. M. Gribner, P.E. REVISION DATE BY COUTPALT LOCATION NO. VI/ Washington State Department of Transportation SR290/BARKER ROAD BNSF GRADE SEPARATION SPOKANE COUNTY - MP 12.5 Plot 1 TC17 TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN OF SHEETS CH LINE A SEE SHEET TC17 L - 720'+ TAPER Notes 1. All temporary traffic control signs shall be Class B 2. This traffic control plan shall be used outside the hours of 6 AM to 8 AM, Monday -Friday. The Engineer may restrict allowed haul hours if operation interferes with traffic. MINIMUM TAPER LENGTH = L (feet) LANE WIDTH (feet) 10 11 12 Posted Speed (mph) 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 105 150 205 270 450 500 550 — — — 115 165 225 295 495 550 605 660 — — 125 180 245 320 540 600 660 720 780 840 T.27N.R.43E.W.M. SPOKANE COUNTY Existing Edge of Pavement Existing Edge Line Existing Guardrail Closed to Traffic Temporary Center Line Temporary Edge Line Temporary Edge of Pavement HATCH BORROW SITE -ACCESS CLASS B SIGNS LEGEND 0 100 200 SCALE IN FEET Temporary Conc. Barrier Sign Existing Alignment Channelizing Devices Type 3 Barricade Work Area C9623 CO #3 Page 13 of 13 CHANNELIZING DEVICE SPACING (FEET) MPH TAPER TANGENT 50/70 40 8D 35/45 30 60 25/30 20 40 FILE NAME G:IC9623 Barker Rd BNSF G ade SeparatlonlTrafalc Cont oIlC9623_PS_TC_HATCH_Access_DS.dgn TIME 748:47 AM DATE 1/25/2022 STA TB PLOTTED BY allenme 10 WASH DESIGNED BY R. LYNN ENTERED BY D. Shattuck JOB NUNBEIR FED.AID PROJ.NO. CHECKED BY R. McNamara PROJ. ENGR. M. Allen, P.E. REGIONAL ADM. M. Grlbner, P.E. REVISION DATE BY C9011 LOOP -NON NO. BE. STAPP BOX 'A fI/ Washington State Department of Transportation SR290/BARKER ROAD BNSF GRADE SEPARATION SPOKANE COUNTY - MP 12.5 Plot TC18 TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN OF SHEETS C9623 CO #3 R1 to MJK 5-18-22 Final Audit Report Final Audit Report 2022-05-19 Created: 2022-05-18 By: Ray McNamara (McNamaR@wsdot.wa.gov) Status: Signed Transaction ID: CBJCHBCAABAA9pJ5P_nhysaWpXgMVMNIxwTpXegFRm1K "C9623 CO #3 R 1 to MJK 5-18-22" History Document created by Ray McNamara (McNamaR@wsdot.wa.gov) 2022-05-18 - 6:58:25 PM GMT- IP address: 198.238.213.147 Document emailed to Kelly Griffith (kelly@maxkuney.com) for signature 2022-05-18 - 6:59:26 PM GMT ,t Email viewed by Kelly Griffith (kelly@maxkuney.com) 2022-05-19 - 4:36:30 AM GMT- IP address: 172.226.41.125 Kelly Griffith (kelly@maxkuney.com) entered valid password. 2022-05-19 - 4:35:10 PM GMT Document e-signed by Kelly Griffith (kelly@maxkuney.com) Signature Date: 2022-05-19 - 4:44:48 PM GMT - Time Source: server- IP address: 107.1.80.106 Agreement completed. 2022-05-19 - 4:44:48 PM GMT Ep Adobe Acrobat Sign WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CHANGE ORDER DATE:03/23/22 PAGE l of 4 CONTRACT NO: 009623 FEDERAL AID NO:TIGERIX 4123(005) CONTRACT TITLE: BARKER RD BNSF GRADE SEPARATION SPOKANE COUNTY -MP CHANGE ORDER NO: 7 BID ITEM 67 QTY REVISION PRIME CONTRACTOR: 910609531 MAX J. KUNEY COMPANY 120 N RALPH ST 99202-4744 SPOKANE WA 99220-0008 (X)Ordered by Engineer under the terms of Section 1-04.4 of the Standard Specifications ( )Change proposed by Contractor !/E//��NDORSED BY: /LGGGy 6/1;5q�� SURETY CONSENT: Kelly ( 7 PDT) CONTRACTOR SIGNATURE May 17, 2022 ATTORNEY IN FACT DATE DATE ORIGINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT: CURRENT CONTRACT AMOUNT: ESTIMATED NET CHANGE THIS ORDER: ESTIMATED CONTRACT TOTAL AFTER CHANGE: Signature Required: leProject Engineer 11,637,134.00 12,245,697.13 37,882.00 12,283,579.13 ( )State Construction Engineer ( )Regional Administrator 0 Other Agency PROJECT ENGINEER SIGNATURE STATE CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER SIGNATURE DATE DATE OTHER APPROVAL WHEN REQUIRED REGIONAL ADMINISTRATOR SIGNATURE SIGNATURE DATE DATE REPRESENTING CG02v04(revised Feb 2005) WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CHANGE ORDER DATE:03/23/22 PAGE 2 of 4 CONTRACT NO:009623 CHANGE ORDER NO: 7 All work, materials, and measurements to be in accordance with the provisions of the Standard Specifications and Special Provisions for the type of construction involved. This contract is revised as follows: Description This change order modifies the pattern and concrete color for portion of two splitter islands, and revises the quantity of Bid Item #67 - Textured and Pigmented Cement Concrete Traffic Island. Plan Sheets Contract Plan sheet 111 of 250 (QTPV4) and is replaced by page 4 of this change order. Construction Requirements For the Textured and Pigmented Cement Conc. Truck Apron concrete for quantity tabulation SI1-1, SI1-3, and SI1-9, the Contractor shall use the Splitter Island and Central Island Pattern Ashlar Stone, and Splitter Island and Central Island dark gray pigment. Working Days The number of working days is not affected by this change order. WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CHANGE ORDER DATE:03/23/22 PAGE 3 of 4 CONTRACT NO:009623 CHANGE ORDER NO: 7 ITEM NO GROUP NO STD ITEM UNIT OF MEASURE UNIT PRICE EST QTY CHANGE EST AMT CHANGE ITEM DESCRIPTION: TEXTURED AND PIGMENTED CEMENT CONC. TRAFF 0067 01 S.Y. 94.00 403.00 37,882.00 AMOUNT TOTAL 37,882.00 QUANTITY TABULATION - PAVING NOTE: THE FIRST NUMBER OF THE "CODE" BELOW REFERS TO THE SHEET NO. OR THE SHEET REFERENCE NO. SHOWING THE CONSTRUCTION FEATURE. THE SECOND NUMBER REFERS TO THE CONSTRUCTION FEATURE FOUND ON THAT SHEET. GRAVEL BACKFILL FOR WALLS TEXTURED AND PIGMENTED CEMENT CONC. TRUCK APRON TEXTURED AND PIGMENTED CEMENT CONC. TRAFFIC ISLAND HMA SWACUT & SEAL ROUNDABOUT SPLITTER ISLAND NOSING CURB ROUNDABOUT CEMENT CONC. CURB AND GUTTER CEMENT CONC. TRAFFIC CURB AND GUTTER ROUNDABOUT CENTRAL ISLAND CEMENT CONC. CURB ROUNDABOUT TRUCK APRON CEM. CONC. CURB AND GUTTER CEMENT CONC. PEDESTRIAN CURB EXTRUDED CURB SEE GENERAL NOTES GENERAL NOTES: C9623 Change Order #7 Page 4 of 4 CODE LOCATIONV \ UNIT OF MEASURE 7, C.Y. S.Y. S.Y. L.F. EACH L.F. L.F. L.F. L.F. L.F. L.F. 1. SEE COSV STD. PLAN R-102 CURBING, TYPE B 2. SEE SHEET PVD1 CURB 1 3. SEE STD. PLAN F-10.18-02 CURB 2 AND SHEET PVD1 4. SEE STD. PLAN F-10.18-02 CURB 3 5. SEE PVD1 FOR SPLITTER ISLAND NOSING CURB DETAIL 6. SEE STD. PLAN F-45.10-02 DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACE 7. SEE PVD3 FOR LANDSCAPE BLOCK WALL DETAIL 8. SEE STD. PLAN F-30.10-04 CEMENT ONCRETE SIDEWALKAND PVD3 FOR EINFORCED SIDEWALK DETAIL SEE STD. PLANS F-40.12-03, F-40.14-03 ND F-40.16-03 CURB RAMPS SEE STD. PLAN C-20.10-06 BEAM GUARDRAIL -TYPE 31, C-22.45-05 TERMINAL, C-25.30 -TRANSITION SECTION TYPE 24 AND G23.60-04 ANCHOR TYPE 10 11. SEE STD. PLAN L-30.10-02 CHAIN LINK GATE 12. SEE STD. PLAN L-20.10-03 CHAIN LINK FENCE TYPE 3 13. SEE STD. PLAN A40.20-04 DETAIL 1 BRIDGE AVING JOINT SEALS 14. SEE STD. PLAN F-10.12-04 CEMENT CONC. PEDESTRIAN CURB 15. SEE STD. PLAN F-10.42-00 EXTRUDED CURB 16. SEE WA PLANS FOR HANDRAIL DETAILS 17. SEE COSV STD. PLAN R-110 TYPE I CONCRETE APPROACH 18. SEE BNSF STD. PLAN APPENDIX C PIPE GATE AND LOCK BOX 19. SEE STD. PLAN C-20.40-07 BEAM GUARDRAIL, TYPE 31 PLACEMENT, 25'-0" SPAN AND STD. PLAN C-25.80-05 TYPE 31 TO TYPE 1 20. USE THE SPLITTER AND CENTRAL ISLAND PATTERN- ASHLAR STONE INSTEAD OF TRUCK APRON PATTERN - BRICK FOR THESE ISLANDS. PV8-4 BA 86+24.25 (31.5' RT) 10 9, 14 PV8-5 BA 86+96.93 (31.5' RT) 19 9, 14 PV8-6 BA 87+24.15 (39.8' RT) TO BA 90+18.00 (32.0' RT) 16 PV8-7 BA 88+70.00 (78.3' RT) 11 PV9-1 BA 90+18.00 (16.0' LT) 32 13 PV9-2 BA 93+18.48 (16.0' LT) 32 13 PV9-3 BA 93+18.48 (16.0' LT) TO SW 32+59.70 (0.5' RT) 10 PV9-4 BA 93+20.81 (16.0' RT) TO SE 43+69.04 (1.5' LT) 376 3 PV9-5 BA 93+18.48 (16.5' RT) TO SE 43+69.04 (2.0' LT) 8 PV9-6 BA 93+18.48 (32.0' RT) TO SE 43+59.04 (16.0' RT) 16 PV9-7 BA 90+09.17 (77.0' RT) TO BA 90+14.77 (95.0' RT) 12 ( SI1-1 BA 93+80.07 (0.5' LT) TO BA 94+79.07 (0.4' LT) 94 1 218 3,5,20 SI1-2 BA 93+75.90 (10.1' RT) TO BA 94+88.24 (10.6' LT) k 6,8 SI1-3 BA 94+89.35 (13.1' LT) TO BA 95+05.58 (20.8' RT) 40 110 3,20 SI1-4 BA 94+27.23 (22.0' RT) TO BA 94+66.47 (37.7' RT) 54 1 110 SI1-5 BA 94+69.59 (28.6' RT) TO BA 94+73.00 (51.3' RT) 6,8 SI1-6 BA 94+73.00 (51.3' RT) TO BA 95+21.34 (67.1' RT) 88 1 130 3,5 SI1-7 TR 104+58.15 (4.7' RT) TO TR 108+08.92 (0.3' LT) 497 1 722 5 SI1-8 TR 108+04.10 (9.8' LT) TO TR 108+18.58 (10.8' RT) 6,: SI1-9 TR 108+18.58(10.8' RT) TO TR 108+49.73(24.9' RT) 93 141 3,20 SI2-1 EB 210+18.65 (18.9' LT) TO EB 210+59.95 (42.8' LT) 83 138 3 SI2-2 EB 210+51.69 (18.9' LT) TO EB 210+69.82 (36.0' LT) 6,8 SI2-3 EB 210+69.82 (36.0' LT) TO EB 217+90.79 (19.3' LT) 1262 1 1495 3,5 PVD2-1 BA 13+97.00 (24.0' LT) TO BA 15+87.12 (91.1' LT) 536 403 239 358 2,4 DW5-1 EB 222+71.58 (108.5' RT) 18 2387 SHEET TOTAL 763 4984 64 5 3440 239 358 29 PROJECT TOTAL 6 763 4984- 64 5 4155 3044 239 358 218 286 2381 R= ION NO. STATE FED. AID PROJ. NO. Ilk Washington State of Transportation SR290/BARKER ROAD BNSF GRADE SEPARATION SPOKANE COUNTY - MP 12.5 QTPV 4 10 WASH REP-HLP-TIGERIX- 4123(005) DESIGNED BY D. POSTEN ENTERED BY U. DATTA SHEET 111 OF 250 SHEETS CHECKED BY J. TAYLOR JOB NUMBER 20Z009 �� �,// Department PROJ. ENGR. D. POSTEN 3/18/22 ADD MISSING QUANTITY FOR PVD2-1 TEH QUANTITY TABULATION - PAVING REGION ADM. M. GRIBNER, PE 01/05/21 AD5 REVISE GEN NOTE 18 DLP CONTRACT NO. DATE DATE REVISION BY C9623 CO #7 to Kuney 5-11-22 Final Audit Report Final Audit Report 2022-05-17 Created: 2022-05-11 By: Ray McNamara (McNamaR@wsdot.wa.gov) Status: Signed Transaction ID: CBJCHBCAABAAMIMLf2Of_fmQlayzCdb9ogGh76cYE01h "C9623 CO #7 to Kuney 5-11-22" History Document created by Ray McNamara (McNamaR@wsdot.wa.gov) 2022-05-11 - 3:50:01 PM GMT- IP address: 198.238.213.148 Document emailed to Kelly Griffith (kelly@maxkuney.com) for signature 2022-05-11 - 3:52:33 PM GMT 'El Email viewed by Kelly Griffith (kelly@maxkuney.com) 2022-05-12 - 4:48:49 AM GMT- IP address: 104.28.116.128 Kelly Griffith (kelly@maxkuney.com) entered valid password. 2022-05-17 - 4:07:17 PM GMT Document e-signed by Kelly Griffith (kelly@maxkuney.com) Signature Date: 2022-05-17 - 4:07:40 PM GMT - Time Source: server- IP address: 107.1.80.106 Agreement completed. 2022-05-17 - 4:07:40 PM GMT Ep Adobe Acrobat Sign CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: May 24, 2022 Check all that apply: ['consent ❑ old business ['information ® admin. report Department Director Approval: ['new business ['public hearing ['pending legislation ['executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Spokane Valley Fire Department Incident and Response Statistics GOVERNING LEGISLATION: PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: BACKGROUND: Fire Chief Soto will provide a statistical report of fire department responses to incidents in Spokane Valley. OPTIONS: Discussion RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: N/A BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: N/A STAFF CONTACT: Frank Soto, Jr., Fire Chief, Spokane Valley Fire Department ATTACHMENTS: PowerPoint Lamp SekAfl Conservation Are Station ORC HARD A.VE Dishman Hills Conservation Area Glenrose Unit Station Spokane Valley i� L TRENTW.O{ Antoine Peak Conservation Area Saltese Uplands Conservation Area Liberty Lake Liberty Lake Regional Park Spokane Valley FD Incident & Response Numbers for April and YTD - 2022 n cid e ntS Explorer 2022 Year -to -Date Incidents Fire Suppression 8.45% Wildland Fire 0.1 3% 1 Haz Mat 0.54% EMS 81.96% Hazard Class % Top Incident Types Total Incidents 600 453 400 356 231 200 144 61 38 34 23 14 73MI Incident Type 1 Top Incident Types 1,491 Camp Sekani 3onservation Ar Station 27 37 41 37 Station Dishrnan Hills Conservation Area 1€ - lenrose knit 12 mi Station Station Spokane Station 56 71 79 - 47 10 Station Station Spokane County, WA State Parks GIS, Esri, HERE, Gar min, SafeGraph, GeoTechnologies, Inc, METI/NASA, US Map Data Table Total Incidents by Month Total Incident 2k 1k 604 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Month Total Incidents by Jurisdiction aa City of City of City of Spokan I-- Liberty e Lake Millwoo Spokane County d Valley Jurisdiction Incidents for Spokane Valley — April 2022 — 84% of Total SVFD 911 Incidents Responses Explorer *A response is counted when an apparatus activates the responding button and an en route time is recorded Tech Rescue 7.62% Fire Suppression 12.13% Haz Mat 1.06% Wildland Fire 0.14% 1 1 EMS 78% Hazard Class % Average Turnout Time (Seconds) 1 400 600 200 Ci 800 01k 75.5 Average Turnout Time 1,417 (CCB) Camp Sui wji PEa.lf1ucimH onservation Area PARK Ao7rdne River ishman Hi atural Are. Dishman Nills Conservation Area - Clenrose Unit I2mi StOlt an C�) 6 elation 8 clp Indiana Ave 86 Bra.wey Ave . tattion 7 1 Station okane Ailey Fir f1 cjl] MEW Stayn 1 u Spokane County, WA State Parks GIS, Esri, HERE, Garmin, SafeGraph, GeoTechnologies, Inc, METVNASA, USGS Total Responses by Month 0eL 2k k ce 0 0 Jan 525 Mar May Month On Scene Responses Occurred Within Own Service Area No 38.29% • Yes 61.71% Total Re 0 0_ N 47 Tv 15 Responses for Spokane Valley — April 2022 Top 5 Responses for April 2022 1. 116 — 17 Falls 2. 76 — 32 Unknown 3. 60 — 26 Sick 4. 55-29 MVA 5. 53 — 25 Psych Other 2.48% Tech Rescue 6.44% Fire Suppression 8.45% Wildland Fire 0.13% Haz Mat 0.54% EMS 81.96% ' - Incidents Explorer 2022 Year -to -Date Incidents Suppression 7.56% null 0.03% Wildland Fire 0.1 5% Haz Mat 0.71 % EMS 83.97% Hazard Class % Top Incident Types 3k Total Incidents Incident Type Camp Sekani conservation Ar 156 113 @tame 116 189 157 191 234 Dishman Hills Conservation Area enrose Unit 366 254 Station Spokane 323 124 104 Station SJQ 332 303 179 acCIIMF Spokane County, WA State Parks GIS, Esri, HERE, Garmin, SafeGraph, GeoTechnologies, Inc, METI/NASA, USG Top Incident Types ► Map Data Table Jan Feb Mar Apr May Month Total Incidents by Jurisdiction W " log C 4, City of City of City of Spokan Liberty e Lake Millwoo Spokane County d Valley Year -to -Date Incidents — 2022 — 83.5% of Total SVFD 911 Incidents Responses Explorer *A response is counted when an apparatus activates the responding button and an en route time is recorded Tech Rescue 6.44% Fire Suppression 10.38% Wildland Fire 0.14% 1 Haz Mat 0.76% EMS 81.45% Hazard Class % Average Turnout Time (Seconds) 1 200 400 600 800 a 76.8 1 k Average Turnout Time sTc ( GB) 41€3 PASADENA �onservatian Area ��yp 1RK 11 C,an,p Sekani t ORCHARD AVE \JJ 20 119 179 E I(rl `543 - - Stat>r 110 414JC 1SH Fishman Hi atural Are Dishman Hills Conservation Area - Glenrose Unit 12 mi Station 8 OK 291 Sr< iron 4 sr Bra --••-ay Ave 150 i1 4100 11k StrI (n 7 E3 4g3 .r Mokanejlley Firms war" Spokane County, WA State Parks GIS, Esri, HERE, Garmin, SafeGraph, GeoTechnoiogies, Inc, METI/NASA, USGS, Total Responses by Month N Own Service Area a a 2k 6,290 I 0 1k -� 525 R H Jan Mar May No 35.69% Month III % On Scene Responses Occurred Within Total Res Yes 64.31 % Year -to -Date Responses — 2022 Top 5 Responses for Year -to -Date 2022 1. 609 — 17 Falls 2. 304 — 32 Unknown 3. 268 — 26 Sick 4. 257 — 25 Psych 5. 232 — 6 Breathing Problem Other 2.13% Tech Rescue Fire 5.46% Suppression 7.56% null 0.03% Wildland Fire 0.15% Haz Mat 0.71 % EMS 83.97% i of J April, 2022 Station Incidents Last Update: 1 Incidents by Station Area % Total Incidents by Station Area Station 6 10.62% Station 2 9.71% Station 10 11.01% Station 9 8.75% Station 3 7.510/0 Station 5 5.14% Station 4 3.84% 14, IStr FIRE CIPT 44. ncidents by Type and Category Last Update: Total Incidents by Category and Year Year 2021 2022 Total Incidents 3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 309 368 17 8 98 0 3551 3173 2441 2102 Rescue 7 J Incident Type Total Incidents Total Incidents Total Incident % Incident Last Year This Year Change Change A. 00 2 -2-100.00% 11-S/F 320 285 -35-10.94% 11-W/11-C 25 15 -10-40.00% 13-S/F 37 30 -7-18.92% 14-E/L/H/M/S 17 8 -9 -52.94% 18-S/F 255 220 -35-13.73% 31-A/B/T 2102 2441 339 16.13% 31-CIDIE 3173 3551 378 11.91% 35-F 10 18 8 80.00% 36-F 1 3 2 200.00% 37-F139-HIL 7 1 -6 -85.71 40-F/40-N 6 10 4 66.67% 40-1/40-T 40 52 12 30.00% 46-NB 260 312 52 20.00% 46-C/D/F/P 49 56 7 14.29% 50-S 64 64 0 0.00% CC 98 345 319 Total 6368 7164 796 12.50% 1822 2 4662 300 284 3730 e� - �Eey c,0 oS 0'1 ° e 1.(0 yey F `�e- ye5 `ce5 �a b @ Q e tie o� °� P. ° 0, 6-4-J �. \,.. �e`-e G°(se �,� ¢ .0) ��e¢ der Incident Category 024, Year to Date 4.171 r-iKr rncrr Incident Totals 1 Month January February March April • May June •July August September October •November December Total Incidents 20000 15000 10000 5000 0 J Last Update: 1 Yearly Incident Totals by Month Same Period Yearly Incident Totals by Hazard Class Hazard Class Fire Suppression 16882 1446 1434 1303 1394 1438 1323 17814 1503 Uj 1461 1472 18293 1701 1636 1486 1571 1675 1420 1472 1412 1387 1421 1515 1438 1257 1410 1366 1492 1351 1467 2018 2019 2020 21887 1965 1931 1902 2127 2021 7164 1774 1808 1678 1904 EMS Tech Rescue Haz Mat 6000 Wildland Fire Rescue Task Force Other 5000 7000 4000 To H 3000 2000 1000 0 2022 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 5493 332 4582 471 5688 5658 6368 7164 Year over Year Incident Change J J Year Over Year Incident Change Year 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 12% 10% 4°/a 2 °/a 6.49% 2018 3.55% 2019 -0.53% 2020 12.55% 2021 12.50% 2022 ildland Fir J % Year Over Year Incident Change by Hazard Class HazardClass Other Wildland Fire Rescue Task Force Haz Mat EMS Fire Suppression Tech Rescue 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total 11.76% 8.77%-29.03% 50.00% 145.45% 39.64% 200.00% 0.00% 400.00% 13.33% -52.94% 17.95% -50.00% 100.00% 150.00 -80.00% 10.00% 12.20% 32.61% -9.84%-16.36% 34.78% 8.43% 8.55% 2.51% -1.92% 14.50% 13.59% 7.57% 2.61% -0.64% 31.62% 3.41%-13.66% 3.43% 13.77% 19.28% -19.44% 0.94% 20.81% 0.23% Year Over Year Incident Change by Hazard Class HazardClass 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total EMS 361 115 -90 668 717 Other 6 5 -18 22 96 Fire Suppression 12 -3 148 21 -87 Haz Mat 5 15 -6 -9 16 Wildland Fire 2 0 12 2 -9 Tech Rescue -53 64 -77 3 67 Rescue Task Force -1 1 3 -4 1771 111 91 21 7 4 1 SVFD Report for Spokane Valley City Council — April 2022 — Significant Events • April 25 Fire Commissioner Meeting The Spokane Valley Fire Department Board of Fire Commissioners unanimously voted to place a multiyear Levy Lid Lift on the August Primary Election ballot. If approved by voters, a Levy Lid Lift allows the Fire District to restore the levy rate, previously approved by voters in 2007, for emergency services, to $1.50 per $1,000 of assessed valuation. Collection would be in 2023, allowing for the five succeeding years to be authorized et 1% or the percentage allowed by the consumer price index (CPI) increase not to exceed 6% as reported each June. • May is Wildfire Awareness Month KXLY news did a story with us on the need to create defensible space around homes. https://rb.gy/fagr0y • SVFD Recruit Academy started May 1, with 11 new Firefighter Recruits for SVFD and 1 from Cheney beginning an 18-week intensive program. Significant Incidents: • Grain Silo Fire, April 20 Spokane Valley Fire Department (SVFD) units responded to a report by a passerby of an exterior fire at a grain silo located in the 1900 block of N. Park Rd. The first arriving crews found an exterior rubbish fire. Crews deployed a handline and quickly extinguished the fire. Truck companies laddered the roof to check for extension while additional crews checked the inside of the building for occupants or any extension of the fire. There was minimal damage to the exterior and interior of the structure. No injuries were reported, and no occupants were found. A total of 6 fire engines, 2 ladder companies and various command staff responded to the incident which included units from the City of Spokane Fire Department and Spokane County Fire District 9. • Garage/Chicken Coop Fire, April 25 Spokane Valley Fire Department (SVFD) units responded to a report of a garage fire in the 11100 block of 17th. The fire crews got a quick knockdown which allowed it to be contained to area of origin (a chicken coop) in the garage. After assisting the fire investigator with their scene examination, the fire crews returned to service. • Storage Silo Fire, April 29 Spokane Valley Fire Department (SVFD) units responded at just past midnight on the 29th for a reported smoldering fire inside a multi -story storage silo at Spokane Seed in the 6000 block of E. Alki,in Spokane Valley. The silo was a approximately half full as reported by staff with a material inside the container of approx. 60,000 bushels that was at risk. The major hazard was the dust created from moving the material as the dust is extremely flammable and had potential to explode based on the overall volume. The hazard was mitigated after two hours when on site staff were able to transfer the unaffected material to another silo while fire department crews stood by with charged hose lines in case dust or other materials ignited. About SVFD The Spokane Valley Fire Department (SVFD) serves a population of 136,000+ over 75-square miles, including the cities of Spokane Valley, LibertyLak. and Millwood, as well as surrounding unincorporated areas. In 2021, our cross -trained Firefighter/EMTs and Firefighter/Paramedics responded to more than 22,400 emergency calls. Established in 1940, SVFD is committed to pursuing excellence and is distinguished as an accredited agency by the Commission on Fire Accreditation International (CFAI), and by SVFD's Class 2 fire Insurance rating from the Washington Survey and Rating Bureau Connect with SVFD at: spokanevalleyfire.com. For department news, safety information, and timely updates, find us on Facebook, Twitter, lnstagram, Linkedln, and YouTube. CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: May 24, 2022 Check all that apply: ['consent ❑ old business ['information ® admin. report Department Director Approval: ❑ ['new business ['public hearing ['pending legislation ['executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Accomplishments Report, 2021 GOVERNING LEGISLATION: PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: BACKGROUND: City Manager Hohman will discuss the highlights of the 2021 Accomplishments Report. OPTIONS: Information RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Information BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: STAFF CONTACT: John Hohman ATTACHMENTS: Attached for information, PowerPoint Presentation 1 1 2021 Accomplishments 1 1 Administration Includes ■ City Council ■ City Manager ■ City Clerk ■ Contract Administration 2021 Council Goals 1. Work with state and federal legislators towards advancing the concepts outlined in the Bridging the Valley study including obtaining financial assistance for the Pines, Sullivan, and Park Grade Separation Projects. 2. Actively pursue a plan to sustain the City's Pavement Preservation Program, to include sustained financing in Street Fund #101 and Pavement Preservation Fund #311. 3. Pursue state and federal financial assistance to address transportation concerns along the entire Barker corridor. 4. Sustain and expand where possible, economic development efforts including the retention and expansion of existing businesses and recruitment of new businesses. 5. Continue to foster relationships with federal, state, county and local legislators. 3 2021 Council Goals 6. Pursue financing for Balfour Park and Appleway Trail amenities, and continue the acquisition of park land. 7. Pursue financing for connections between the Appleway Trail, Balfour Park, Dishman Hills and the Centennial Trail creating where possible, a continuous loop for users. 8. Maximize the law enforcement contract to address staffing levels by enhancing recruiting efforts, minimizing out -of -service days, increasing retention, and taking steps to make the officer positions and the Spokane Valley Police Department increasingly appealing as a career path for those seeking to pursue a law enforcement career in Spokane Valley. 9. Increase community interactions, share information, and obtain feedback on current and future projects and priorities. 10. Prioritize involvement in public safety, in particular discussions regarding the jail and the criminal justice system, in order to maintain an understanding of options to keep costs under control. 4 CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEES: REGIONAL REPRESENTATION PARTICIPATION 1. Aging & Long Term Care of Eastern Washington 2. Chamber of Commerce Board 3. Clean Air Agency 4. Continuum of Care for the Homeless, Spokane County 5. Growth Management Steering Committee of Elected Officials (GMA) 6. Greater Spokane Incorporated Board (GSI) 7. Housing & Community Development Advisory Committee (HCDAC) 8. Mayors Association of Northeast Washington 9. Spokane Regional Law and Justice Council (SRLJC) 10. Spokane Regional Transportation Council (SRTC) Spokane Valley City Council Committees 11. Spokane Transit Authority (STA) 1. Advance Agenda Committee 12. Tourism Promotion Area (TPA) 2. Finance Committee 13. Visit Spokane 3. Governance Manual Committee 14. Wastewater Policy Advisory Board 4. Lodging Tax Advisory Committee (LTAC) 5 1 1 Meetings Resolutions Ordinances Total Meetings 50 Regular Council Meetings 22 Study Sessions 22 Special Meetings 6 DIOThh, I 01 WAh1115,1 ON. TUT IV ro. Mn1 STIIERF 4, OM O Nen, .F.MT,014, 9- Resolutions passed 22 - Ordinances passed Aee 114 MO, ,ory th. 111 km. II o " o c9dc Um" 39 6 City Clerk • Public Records Requests - 406 - Reported staff time spent processing requests: 1754 hrs - Allowable fees collected: $383.10 • Records Management - Records added to storage: 75 boxes - Records destroyed: 25 boxes plus 737 individual files - File retrieval & return requests: 74 • Contracts processed: 269 • Recorded Documents: 110 • Legal Notices published: 236 • Liquor License applications: 31 • Special Occasion Liquor License applications: 14 Marijuana License applications: 4 7 Contract Administration Homelessness ■ Processed, along with Legal, a revision to the City's Camping Ordinance, providing easier administration of homeless camps, greater opportunities for the homeless, and fewer conflicts between users of public space. ■ Actively participated in the recruitment of a new Housing and Homeless Coordinator. ■ Through mid -March, attended and participated in HCDAC, COC, Regional Governance Workgroups, and Spokane Valley Homeless Huddle meetings; coordinated with Spokane County and Spokane regarding the administration of homelessness funds; and performed regular field visits to engage the Spokane Valley homeless population. ■ Evaluated warming center proposal compared to land -use regulations. ■ Coordinated with Spokane County to renew arrangement with Spokane to continue managing Consolidated Homeless Grant funds while ensuring Spokane Valley is adequately served; gave presentation to Council. ■ Met with shelters to start process of establishing dedicated Spokane Valley beds, allowing greater resources for those in need and allowing enforcement of camping regulations. ■ Gave a presentation to the Greater Valley Support network on Spokane Valley efforts to address homelessness, providing an opportunity to correct misinformation and misperceptions that existed. ■ Ensured that budget shortfalls and Spokane Valley needs were addressed prior to committing funds to the Bridge Shelter. 8 Contract Administration Public Safety ■ Evaluated costs/benefits of law enforcement bodycams and presented to Council. ■ Evaluated potential causes of increase to Jail population and communicated impact to City Manager and Finance Director; identified cost mitigation strategies. ■ Presented update on Public Safety contracts to Council including cost trends, term specifics, challenges, and cost control measures. ■ Evaluated, monitored, and conveyed Valley position regarding training center and firing range; co -presented information to Council; final result is no capital costs for Valley and minor cost impact for operational costs. ■ Presented to Council (which was approved) an amendment to the Law Enforcement agreement that added a specialty unit for crowd control and updated exhibits to reflect staffing changes. ■ Attended and participated in the strategic planning session for the Sheriff's Office to allow enhanced coordination and communication. ■ Presented to Council the new Emergency Management agreement for adoption, outlining details and addressing concerns abouts Spokane possible withdrawal. The final result was a contract that provides specific support to the City's emergency planning efforts while lowering costs and protecting the City against large cost fluctuations. 9 Contract Administration Public Safety (continued) ■ Processed and presented the Justice Assistance Grant in the amount of almost $30,000 that went toward the costs associated with implementing bodycams for the Spokane Valley Police. ■ Conducted an evaluation of SVPD fleet and presented options to update fleet and create replacement schedule. The end result was negotiating control over dedicated vehicles in the contract, processing an order for 24 new vehicles to modernize fleet, and implementing an enhanced replacement scheduled to ensure dependable transportation for dedicated Spokane Valley officers ■ Evaluated Animal Control Services and identified ways to improve service to Spokane Valley ,especially regarding dog -bite incidents. ■ Saved $30,000 in forensics costs for 2019 S&A and reduced overall costs by $279,000. ■ Saved $82,000 in pre-trial costs through review of salary costs while updating the cost methodology to provide fair and accurate costs while reducing the financial impact to the City. ■ Worked with front desk staff to ensure proper routing of concerns and complaints about public safety services. ■ In coordination with the Assistant Police Chief, updated the workload indicators and performance measures to better reflect the quality of service and value being received by the City for Police Services. ■ Received a state public defense grant in the amount of $39,000 to help mitigate the impact of caseload limits. ■ Successfully negotiated independent tracking and charging of fuel costs by officer and unit so the City will have better control over fuel costs and not subsidize fuel costs for larger geographic areas covered by the Sheriff's Office. 10 Contract Administration Other ■ Provided presentation to Council the full analysis of adding an in-house GIS FTE versus contracting for service; evaluated GIS Services needs and negotiated changes with Spokane County; processed new agreement. ■ Evaluated and recommended solid waste disposal rates, ensuring a low-cost, local , option for citizens to dispose of trash, recycling, organics, and hazardous waste. 11 1 1 HUMAN RESOURCES Silokane� ,Valley® Human Resources • Led the Management Team to arrive at a successful Labor Agreement effective January 1, 2022. • Managed 19 recruitments having an average of 15 applicants, interviewed 51 candidates, hiring 12 employees. • Successfully passed the annual Washington Cities Insurance Authority audit regarding Homelessness initiatives. • Assisted the Council in appointing a successor to fill the City Manager Vacancy. • Supported City departments in returning employees to traditional work locations. • Achieved the 2021 WellCity Award offering 6 separate wellness programs • Responded to employee Covid 19 exposures to prevent employee to employee transmission. • Reviewed over 200 City Contracts for Risk Management purposes. • Assisted the Eden replacement team in a City-wide needs assessment. • Processed over 134 employee action forms. 13 1 1 OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY 14 Office of the City Attorney - Assisted and advised on numerous significant development and land use issues at the permitting and Council level, including conducting administrative appeals. Continued advising Community & Public Works regarding large development projects, including litigation in Superior Court and the Court of Appeals related to property acquisitions. - Assisted in numerous land acquisitions, including the Flora park property, the Ponderosa park property, the Summerfield park property, the Flora Road property for a pedestrian bridge on the south bank of the Spokane River, and property for future law enforcement purposes (former White Elephant site). - Assisted Council and other staff in establishing a process for distributing $16 million in ARPA/CLFR funding to individuals, businesses, and organizations in substantial need. - Assisted in addressing issues relating to homelessness, including camping regulations, trespass on public property, contracting for homeless shelter reservation slots for City homeless, assisting with issues related to funding options for affordable housing and homeless shelters, and regional collaboration. A portion of this work involved working with and training new City personnel and outreach Deputy. Assisted in the drafting of the City's Housing Action Plan for adoption by the Council. - Participated in redrafting the SRTC interlocal agreement to allow expanded membership. - Arranged for contract for second Hearing Examiner to ensure assigned matters can be timely decided. 15 Office of the City Attorney - Continued - Assisted in drafting and accomplishing goals on the 2021 state and federal legislative agendas. - Assisted in responding to numerous Public Record requests. - Continued assisting in how the City implemented Governor Inslee's orders relating to operation of City facilities in the COVID-19 pandemic, including appropriate measures and timing for lifting of restrictions of use of City facilities. - Assisted in revising various contracts resulting from the pandemic (use of City facilities). - Assisted in preparing a Shoreline Master Plan update for Council approval. - Collaborated with regional partners to oppose Spokane's proposed imposition of a wastewater utility tax on County facilities that would be passed on largely to Spokane Valley residents. - Assist in the City Manager transition and recruitment relating to retirement of Mark Calhoun. 16 Office of the City Attorney - Continued - Negotiated final franchise with Yellowstone Pipe Line relating to petroleum product transport. - Assisted in identifying scope of construction defect issues and potential remedies for City Hall, preparing for repair of the same. - Resolved 46 nuisance and code enforcement cases, including 4 abatements. Successfully resolved 3 administrative code enforcement appeals. - Assisted Code Compliance and outside agencies to successfully resolve 16 repeat and long outstanding nuisance properties, which are now fully cleaned up and in compliance. - Resolved and successfully abated 2 chronic nuisance properties. - Resolved the City's first unfit structure case under SVMC 17.105 to address a burned -out structure. - Assisted Council and staff regarding potential formation of a City -only Tourism Promotion Area. 17 Finance ■ Effects of COVI D-19: - Analyzed City revenues for potential impact due to the effect of COVID-19 restrictions on the economy. - Worked with the Office of the City Attorney, other departments, and community partners to plan for the City's American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) allocation in the amount of about $16 million. 18 Finance ■ Completed the 2020 annual financial report and related audit process conducted by the State Auditor's Office. ➢ Result was a "clean" opinion with few audit recommendations. ■ Worked with the City Manager's office and all other departments to complete the 2022 Budget development process. ■ Worked with Engineering to evaluate capital project budgets and accommodate changes to construction schedules when necessary. ■ Worked with a consultant to document current financial software procedures and future needs. Issued an RFP for financial management software selection in 2022. 2022 ANNUAL BUDGET 10210 E. Sprague Avenue, Spokane Valley WA 99206 ky www.SpokaneValley.org 19 COMMUNITY AND PUBLIC WORKS Engineering Division Economic Development Division Building and Planning Division SC1TYokane p Valle Y Community & Public Works Sj�1n��- Engineering Division jvalley Capital Improvement Program Traffic Operations Stormwater Utility Street Maintenance Community & Public Works Capital Improvement Program TRANSPORTATION PLANNING: Coordinated with SRTC's Technical Transportation Committee (TTC) and State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) PAVEMENT PRESERVATION PROGRAM: Continued work on implementing Street Preservation Program Utilized grant funds and City funds to maximize preservation program Implemented a preservation program for local access street funded by the Street Wear Fee Partnered with utility providers to maximize preservation funds, minimize impacts to the traveling public and minimize future pavement cuts 22 Community & Public Works Capital Improvement Program DESIGN PROJECTS: Pines Road/BNSF Grade Separation Barker Road/Union Pacific Railroad Crossing ➢ Wilbur Sidewalk - Boone to Mission ➢ Sprague & Barker Intersection Improvement ➢ Loop Trail Project - Plantes Ferry Park to Flora Road ➢ Sullivan & Wellesley Intersection Improvement ➢ Pines & Mission Intersection Improvement Pines Road/BNSF Grade Separation 23 Community & Public Works Capital Improvement Program DESIGN PROJECTS: NE Industrial Area Sewer Improvements Retroreflective Post Panels Balfour Park Improvements - Phase 1 Broadway Avenue Preservation - Fancher to Havana Sullivan Avenue Preservation - Sprague to 8th Evergreen Preservation - Broadway to Mission 2022 Local Access Streets Balfour Park Improvements - Phase 1 24 Community & Public Works Capital Improvement Program CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS: Argonne/Montgomery Concrete Intersection Barker Road/BNSF Grade Separation Park Road Sidewalk Sullivan Bridge Deck Repair Brown's Park Improvements Appleway Stormwater Improvements Balfour Park Frontage Improvements Brown's Park Improvements Appleway Stormwater Improvements ullivan Road Overcrossing Deck Repair INIMPONIM Zia!MIL iAll. „,. 25 Community & Public Works Capital Improvement Program 2021 Street Preservation Projects Evergreen Road Preservation - Sprague to Broadway Mullan Road Preservation - Broadway to Mission 2021 Local Access Street Preservation 2021 Totals 2021 Local Access Streets Project Cost Lane Miles $1,960,000 0.9 $1,870,000 0.3 $1,723,000 2.62 $5,553,000 Evergreen Road Preservation 26 Community & Public Works Traffic Operations PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT: Responded to 496 Citizen Requests Reviewed 17 Special Event permits Reviewed and approved Traffic Control Plans for 375 right-of-way use permits for private projects CAPITAL PROJECTS & DATA COLLECTION: Conducted 158 traffic counts throughout the City 20 CIP projects developed traffic control & signing plan op , °Mirabeau - Subarea: ?r NE Industrial l uArea PAO: $2,831' Euclid.l -4 119-644. $698/Trip - I - See Master #--_ ° � ��A Schedul M,F,,ee _),_ N Pines Rd Subar�'a±� �— See $2,195/Trip Master '� S. Barker Corridor ' Impact Fees r $t t m� Fee Schedule See Master � - _ Fee Schedule i �, n s, 4,e a,n 6 c g� ``` DEVELOPMENT REVIEW: Determined Traffic related analysis requirements for 248 land use submittals, reviewed 43 traffic studies with 14 developments within the impact fee areas Developed two additional transportation impact fee areas (fees updated in April 2022) 27 Community & Public Works Traffic Operations TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM MANAGEMENT: Added 4 intersections to the ITS network Signal timing modifications on 2 arterial corridors Added ATSPM collection at 3 intersections TRAFFIC SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS: Upgrades to signal controllers at 8 intersections Upgrades to signal wiring and equipment at 1 location Installed School Zone beacons at 3 schools Worked with County & WSDOT signal shops to replace damaged signal pole at Appleway & Thierman. Extensive repair was complete in matter of days rather than weeks Repaired and/or replaced signal equipment or luminaires damaged in crashes at 15 locations 28 Community & Public Works Stormwater Utility OPERATIONS: Responded to 125 storm drainage calls Swept over 1,000 cubic yards of street debris Cleaned over 1,800 storm structures Maintained 13+ acres of irrigated turf INSPECTIONS: Investigations of 21 reported spills Over 700 drywell inspections IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS: Maintenance - 5 project sites 29 Community & Public Works Stormwater Utility WATER QUALITY IMPROVEMENTS: Risk Assessment Point Reduction (UIC Retrofits) - 221 pts Installation of Bio-Infiltration Swales - 20 Pretreatment with CDS Units - 2 Pretreatment with Silva Cells - 5 CONSTRUCTION - STORMWATER GRANTS: Spokane Regional Decant Facility Canopy Appleway Avenue Improvements - University to Farr UIC Retrofit with Preservation Projects EXECUTION AND DEVELOPMENT - STORMWATER GRANTS: UIC Retrofit Improvements with Preservation Projects Sprague Avenue Improvements - University to Park 2021 - 2023 Stormwater Quality Capacity Grant 30 Community & Public Works Street Maintenance STREET MAINTENANCE: Managed Street Maintenance Contracts Completed $1.4M toward Pavement Preservation Placed 8,800 tons of asphalt Crack sealed approx. 50 lane miles of roadway Maintained over 50 miles of gravel shouldered roadways Sidewalk, ADA pedestrian ramp and curb repair Completed $180,000 in stormwater repair projects Managed sweeping and vactor services contracts 31 Community & Public Works Street Maintenance GEIGER WORK CREW - (2,970 MAN HOURS WORKED) Mowed and maintained 105 acres of dry land grass Removed 123,180 lbs. of garbage and vegetation from City right-of-way Cleared ice and snow from City sidewalks and Safe Route to School Sidewalks SNOW AND ICE REMOVAL: 58 snow days with at least a trace of snow - 35.0 inches of snowfall total Completed one full -city residential plow Applied 162,630 gallons of liquid deicer and 1,520 tons of granular deicer 32 1 1 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT lokane 33 Economic Development Business Development ■ Northeast Industrial Area/Spokane Business Park - Mercer Mass Timber - CarbonQuest ($350,000 grant from state commerce) - Barker Logistics Center - Triad Machinery ■ Retail and Leisure recruitment/development Performing Arts Center We Play (Spokane Valley Mall) Birkenstock (Spokane Valley Mall) Ashley Furniture ■ 10,000 Business licenses in the City - Provide email/print brochure with resources to every business - Processed 398 home business permits ■ Economic Development website - New industries MERCER mass timer 19202 E. Garland Ave 34 Economic Development Long Range Planning ■ Comp. Plan Amendments (Homeless & Housing) ■ Housing Action Plan ■ Shoreline Master Program ■ Interim chapter 19.45 SVMC 35 Economic Development Marketing (More than 120 marketing media materials created) Business Development Marketing • Multiple digital media and video campaigns: - Skilled labor/workforce recruitment - Business recruitment & retention • Print media -trade/tourism magazines • Video projects - Buy Local, Tru Hilton, Streets Sustainability, CenterPlace, Barker/BNSF Grade Separation Project, street improvement projects Tourism Marketing • 'Go beyond the Backyard' digital campaign, early summer through early fall • Regional event promotion - Farmers Market, SV Summer Theatre, Winterfest City of Spokane Valley ..-�ird.try Spokare reg,o,' the 5th e ration Take advantage of our sk.,ed workto,e .,, your business. City of Spokane Valley - Municipal Government Are you are ready to go beyond your backyard? Make Spokane Valley your next destination. BEYuh'+i rXI.0 BAcxrgaA Explore our many Iocal craft breweries! Plan Your Stay! You and 16 others ness in Spokane Valley, LEARN MORE Ped App P;a . 2 Comments SHOP LOCAL AND REGIONAL VENDORS FRIDAY'S 4 - 8PM at CENTERPLACE IN SPOKANE VALLEY. 36 Economic Development Public Relations • Hosted 5 special events, including the State of the City, which had more than 200 in attendance. • Produced semi-annual city newsletters and 76 media releases. • 404 total media stories; 161 earned media stories • Produced videos for CenterPlace, snow removal, Browns Park, PMP, road construction projects and Senior Center. • Social Media Improvement - Facebook: gained 4,317 followers - Instagram: gained 1,079 followers, posted 176 times - Linkedln: gained 1,440 followers - Twitter: gained 1,317 followers, tweeted 511 times YouTube: reached 100 followers Spokane Valley 2021 STATE OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY s.rina,w....rmu Nan.. Funding Our Streets CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS SUMMER /LANS HOUSING ACTION PLAN 37 Economic Development Partners ■ Attended 72 meetings with regional partners ■ Greater Spokane Incorporated - ADO Working Group - Advantage Spokane Working Group - Public Policy Committee - Community Economic Development Study ■ Greater Spokane Valley Chamber of Commerce - Let's Talk Shop - Shop Local/Shop Small holiday campaign ■ Visit Spokane - Tourism & Event website for event planners ■ Spokane County - Expo Center expansion ■ Inland Northwest Partners - Advisory Board 38 Economic Development Housing and Homeless Accomplishments • Received funding to hire a FT Outreach Specialist and a Homeless Outreach officer to respond to community concerns and engage individuals experiencing homelessness. • Developing data collection tool in partnership with SVPD to gain an understanding of who/how many are experiencing homelessness in our community. • Facilitated the removal of tens of thousands of pounds of trash from camp locations in partnership with DOT, State Parks, DNR and others. • Connected 31 women to shelter at Hope House, 5 individuals to Stabilization services, and 11 individuals to other shelter options. • Established a Valley Huddle to bring area stakeholders together to communicate and coordinate regarding issues surrounding homelessness in Spokane Valley, including case conferencing to discuss specific individuals and the work of moving them towards housing solutions. • Developed resource lists and information guides for distribution to those experiencing homelessness. 39 Economic Development GIS • Front desk ROW application creation - Empowering our staff - Quicker data turn around - More informed data entry • Scripting - Automatic/nightly County data import - Current data for our permitting staff • Land Capacity Analysis - Creating new datasets to isolate property more accurately which is also more reflective of reality Spo . ne Va ey Incentive Map Parcel Number. 45162 0326 Link ro Assessor. rc6 page Zoning Designation: 5 ngle.Family Residenaa ;R-3) Zoning Descr peon: Allows for single-family residential development en provides exibility end promotes reinvestment sang a. isolationsly neighborhoods n Property Size: sqh 2.010000 acres) Permitted Uses: Sookane Valley Municiggl Cade 19.60050 Zoom 40 1 1 Community & Public Works Sji&iine j�alley° Building & Planning Applications Apply Online Apply online with our quick and easy process APPLY Pay Online Pay your applications quickly and securely Contact Us My Inspections Request an inspection when you are ready REQUEST ■ View Applications a active O expired / inactive 2 closed My Applications Review your applications and inspection results VIEW 41 Community & Public Works Building & Planning CONSTRUCTION PERMITS ISSUED: 7,000 6,000 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 5,136 I 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 42 Community & Public Works Building & Planning PERMIT VALUATIONS: $500.0 $450.0 $400.0 $350.0 $300.0 $250.0 $200.0 $150.0 $100.0 $ 50.0 $- In Millions $262.5 $273.5 $220.1 $264.82 $299.04 $469.2 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 43 Community & Public Works Building & Planning 2021 MAJOR PROJECTS INDUSTRIAL/MANUFACTURING/WAREHOUSE: Amazon (aka Fireball GEG 2) - 1.5 mil sf warehouse shell and tenant build -out Amazon (aka Fireball GEG 2) - conveyor system in new warehouse Barker Logistics Center - 132,000 sf warehouse shell for 8 tenants Triad Machinery - 17,875 sf heavy equipment sales, rental, and service facility Kreuger Warehouse - 40,500 sf warehouse for sheet metal company MULTI -FAMILY: Quarry Apartments South - 6 buildings, 192 units Carnahan West Phase 1 - 4 buildings, 126 units Barker & Sprague Apartments - 3 buildings, 72 units Jack's Villas - 4 buildings, 46 units Dishman Multi -Family - 1 building, 32 units 44 Community & Public Works Building & Planning 2021 MAJOR PROJECTS RETAIL/GENERAL BUSINESS: Magnolia Place - 123,450 sf assisted living/memory care community Evergreen Commerce Park Phase 2 - 42,245 sf in 3 multi -tenant buildings Camden Homes Office & Training Facility - 23,719 sf in 2 buildings Spokane Conservation District - 15,000 sf office building Mansfield at Mirabeau Office Building - 12,900 sf medical office building Community & Public Works Building & Planning ONLINE PERMIT PORTAL USE ➢ Total Permits Received vs. Permits Received Online 7000 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 1 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 ■ Total Applications Received ■ Total Applications Received Online 2021 46 1 1 Community & Public Works Building & Planning 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 PLANNING 158 Land Use Applications Processed 43 BLA 1 44 SHP 1 6 SUB 1 BSP 1 En 8 FINAL CPA SEPA 18 ADE 47 Community & Public Works Building & Planning CODE ENFORCEMENT 701 Cases Processed Stop work, 1 Property, 169 General, 37 Nuisance, 489 48 Parks, Recreation & Facilities Spokane jUalley ■ Administration and Maintenance ■ CenterPlace Regional Event Center ■ Recreation and Aquatics ■ Senior Center Parks, Recreation & Facilities • PARKS ADMINISTRATION & MAINTENANCE Our department received a new Parks, Recreation and Facilities Director, John Bottelli, following the retirement of Mike Stone. The Facilities division was added to the position to now oversee the maintenance of all City -owned facilities. ■ The COVID-19 global pandemic continued to alter what we needed to do on a daily basis across our department - following the various phases of re -opening, educating the public, changing our forms and programs, and frequently making changes to our website with updates. ■ The "Homeless Huddle" - a bi-weekly coordination of City staff, law enforcement, and social service organizations - was beneficial for addressing and helping the homeless/transient population in our City. ■ We continued to coordinate with WA State Parks and other area jurisdictions under the inter -agency agreement for the maintenance and operation of the Centennial Trail. • WASHINGTON'S PHASED APPROACH Reopening Business and Modifying Physical Distancing Measures ntM DEIEI Phase 1 Phase2 Phase3 50 4 Phase Parks, Recreation & Facilities • PARKS ADMINISTRATION & MAINTENANCE ■ January brought a powerful windstorm and we lost nine trees in the parks. Hazardous areas were secured, and all trees and debris were removed quickly. We continued to incur broken limbs of trees from subsequent, less hazardous windstorms. ■ Maintenance and repairs of our parks and trails increased with the significant increase in park use by the public. 51 Parks, Recreation & Facilities • PARKS ADMINISTRATION & MAINTENANCE • The public was eager to resume their gatherings in the parks. For shelter reservations alone, despite the mid -year re- opening, we were back up to 279, compared to 300-350 in prior years. Spokane Valle Te-=y, Partners FOOD BANK & FAMILY SERVICES PREVENTING 'Y.ER AND POVERTY • We administered 18 Special Event Permits with an estimated 29,000 total participants. Events included four walk/runs, two bike rides, three car shows, Crave!, the Spokane Valley Farmers Market, Western Dance Hall salmon BBQ feed, radio -controlled car race, an outdoor Spokane Valley Summer Theater on the West Lawn Plaza, multiple mobile food bank distributions, one winter parade, and more. 52 Parks, Recreation & Facilities • PARKS ADMINISTRATION & MAINTENANCE ■ The final construction phase of the Browns Park Master Plan was completed with the new playground and additional shelter and restroom. We held a dedication ceremony/ribbon cutting, and the public is really enjoying all the improvements! ■ We participated with Public Works and the selected design team on the Balfour Park Master Plan and held a community workshop and online public input survey. Based on that input, the construction design plans were then completed. 53 Parks, Recreation & Facilities • PARKS ADMINISTRATION & MAINTENANCE ■ We acquired a 17-acre property in the Ponderosa neighborhood from CVSD. We completed GIS mapping current conditions on the property to help us plan for the future. ■ We collaborated with partner agencies and landowners regarding the envisioned Spokane Valley River Loop Trail. One part of this project included the City acquiring a small parcel of land on the south side of the river at Flora Rd and the Centennial Trail for a future pedestrian suspension bridge. 54 Parks, Recreation & Facilities • FACILITY MAINTENANCE ■ Improvements were made to the maintenance shop exterior lighting, electrical outlets and job shed to improve outdoor working conditions under COVID-19 workplace safety requirements. ■ Research was conducted on UV light air purification systems for potential upgrades for safety at City Hall, CenterPlace, the Maintenance Shop and Police Precinct. SPOKANE VALLEY POLICE ri SPOKANE COUNTY DISTRICT COURT ` 12710 55 Parks, Recreation & Facilities • FACILITY MAINTENANCE ■ Worked with McKinstry to find and repair HVAC deficiencies at City Hall. at. ■ Made modifications to room layouts and workspaces to enable city staff and City Council to return to City Hall. ■ Brought City Hall janitorial services in-house for an improved level of service. 56 Parks, Recreation & Facilities ■ Groups were excited to be back in CenterPlace! There were 397 events held in 2021, and we are picking up the pace for 2022 bookings. ■ CenterPlace received two Best in Business to Business (B2B) Awards this year from the readers of Spokane Coeur d'Alene Living magazine. The categories were "Best Place to Host a Company Party" (silver) and "Best Business Event Facility (bronze). ■ The Great Room sound system was updated including programming of the A/V system and additional stage -fill speakers. CENTERPLACE REGIONAL EVENT CENTER CenterPlace West Lawn Plaza 57 Parks, Recreation & Facilities • CENTERPLACE REGIONAL EVENT CENTER CenterPlace Regional Event Center ■ We had a ribbon cutting for the new West Lawn Plaza. The first ever American Asian Pacific Islander (AAPI) Heritage Day was held on the plaza. The Spokane Valley Farmers Market expanded from the parking lot to include monthly food truck rallies on the plaza. ■ With assistance from the Economic Development Dept., we contracted with Atlas to create a brand new fully interactive website to assist in promoting CenterPlace Regional Event Center. Check it out at: vvvvivv.ue 'Lei picfuepur.cfi luvcluuey.uuI I I ■ A much -needed, new security camera system was installed with many cameras throughout and around the perimeter of the building. This has significantly improved safety at the facility with better quality images and more vantage points, allowing us to better monitor the CenterPlace campus. 58 Parks, Recreation & Facilities • RECREATION ■ The Spring and Summer Recreation Guide went virtual this year and we were able to have modified activities based upon the Governor's re -opening phases. ■ We were successful in obtaining a grant from Spokane Parks Foundation to provide funding for scholarships for Summer Day Camp participants. ■ We hired and trained nine summer staff for our programs. We were able to have 30 campers in two pods for our down -sized, weekly-themed camp with games, crafts, and exercise. 59 Parks, Recreation & Facilities • RECREATION • The free Summer Meal Program through EVSD was at three parks with to -go breakfast a n d lunch meals and to -go fun activities. Spokane County Library District also offered books for checkout at each site. • We offered two outdoor Drive -In Movies. Movies were sponsored in part by WSECU. • FROM 'ENE DRSF OF gomtsooti MY DEAREST IIEAU 5eeetlu¢ fiwm tbe. Matt Told All the elves boorrala um Mryvr. born chorkloo m mt>°" °na tiara me write hum et. wuh tort lake ridlrlC'kllc�l�� Nur anal ore von' pmua of Eau jar learnmOyom }llCruld WWII.µ lu u. roeoo, I heurd you.. aV aJor hoeraly. ifaw maleull'Ikre at the 1(mt1'vnlr we've all born hard nrworkhemv@ ready for the labl. yt tine tow aha➢ Is ball of was wo. m be aged Into We vlelgh avd the r naem ore mrhr m beau rbeh magical PL. Eve Etv alstwa d, k1 I m.d,weyanatkedfartaw te make Mr➢nl. elrfm_ mr. a helrtrran! Mu.(lavaumllinhlk] ate to wy on my She'. s canal, it ti rflr after all Moe dclleaom eoalrla I. yearn be a w forward to WI. yov.aary won. il member'nuw it ym on your hest beharror ao3 aourfarget total -Fad bnlldeyrbeco AO 1-10 HO! HAPPY HOLIDAYSI m-tbt.��Lawe Because Santa wasn't available for the Breakfast With Santa event this year, we teamed up with him and his elves to provide Letters From Santa. This program is catching on and fun for all involved, including adults! 60 Parks, Recreation & Facilities • AQUATICS • Working within Washington's safe start COVID-19 guidelines, we were able to offer limited open swim, swim lessons, Drowning Prevention Courses, swim team, water exercise and lap swim options for our community. With that, there were 584 children in swim lessons and 102 in swim team, and 589 who participated in the ever -popular water exercise! • With the help of the Make a Splash in a Kid's Life program with the Spokane Parks Foundation, we were able to offer free swim clinics at each pool and scholarships for swimming lessons. • Our 10th annual "Paws in the Pool" dog swim event was held with 36 happy dogs participating. Pet Vet helped to sponsor the event and provided the required veterinarian in attendance at the event. SPOK4N G PARKS FO UN PAT ION MAKE A SPLa kiASlifeH . in ds 61 Parks, Recreation & Facilities • SENIOR CENTER ■ While the building was temporarily closed due to COVID-19, new carpet was installed at the front desk and copier room. ■ The seniors were so excited when they were able to open their doors again, and plan and participate in activities together, despite modifications due to COVID-19 such as facial coverings and limited numbers. Several new volunteers came to help with front desk assistance and as activity leaders. ■ Meals on Wheels was back to serve lunchtime meals again. ■ Spokane Community Colleges ACT2 art and exercise classes resumed. 62 SPOKANE VALLEY POLICE DEPARTMENT 2021 Spokane jUalley Spokane Valley Police Department Patrol Division ❖ Total citizen -initiated calls for service (CFS) increased from 46,284 in 2020 to 51,038 in 2021. ❖ CFS receiving deputy response decreased from 29,567 in 2020 to 28,940 in 2020, likely as a result of legislative changes and increased call volume. ❖ Deputy -involved incidents decreased from 44,719 in 2020 to 40,073 in 2021, to include deputy -initiated incidents. Again, this is likely due to legislative changes and increased call volume. 64 Spokane Valley Police Department Patrol Division ❖ Creation of Homeless Outreach Officer position ❖ Additional Behavioral Health Unit Officer (Grant - Funded) ❖ Return of Bike Patrols ❖ Relocation of SWAT to a facility in Spokane Valley, allowing for quicker response to emergency situations Spokane Valley Police Department Traffic Unit ❖ The Traffic Unit in Spokane Valley made 5,658 traffic stops and responded to 1,771 accidents. ❖ DUI arrests increased in 2021 with a total of 216, compared to 120 in 2020. ❖ The Traffic Unit investigated 3 fatalities and 16 serious injury traffic collisions in 2021 compared to 10 fatalities and 6 serious injury collisions in 2020. They assisted with 11 Major Crimes incidents. ❖ The unit assisted with 7 line -of -duty escorts, and 2 dignitary -type escorts through Spokane Valley (one for Tyler Johnson MHL Stanley Cup Winner and the other for the Gonzaga Men's Basketball Team). ❖ Traffic School was resumed in May, and 354 applicants were processed for classes from May through December 2021. 66 Spokane Valley Police Department Traffic Unit Speed Emphasis Patrols ❖ Three new speed -measuring trailers purchased in 2021, with two assigned to Spokane Valley. ❖ Number of speed trailer requests received: 132* ❖ Number of trailer deployments: 25 ❖ We've determined that the trailers are a good deterrent, and with the ability to record data on a 24/7 basis, it provides great information on how we can direct traffic emphasis patrols with a deputy at high violation times. *this includes duplicate requests for the same location 67 Spokane Valley Police Department Investigations: Intelligence -Led Policing ❖ Search Warrants: In 2021, SVIU served 45 search warrants, recovering $1,575.416 in stolen property and currency. ❖ In 2021, SVIU detectives investigated 2,095 of 6,107 cases, which is 34.3%, the highest average over four years. ❖ SVIU arrested 181 persons charged with 308 felonies and 104 misdemeanors. ❖ Detectives recovered and/or seized 11 firearms, 4 of which were stolen. ❖ Detectives seized 3 vehicles, 1 firearm, and $5,467 in currency as proceeds of the Delivery of Controlled Substances. ❖ SVIU served 53 Chronic Nuisance Property Notices and 4 properties were abated. 68 Spokane Valley Police Department Crime Prevention ❖ In 2021, SVPD Crime Prevention Deputy Louis Acosta provided the following training and assessment services to the community: • Active Shooter Training - Canopy Credit Union branches and Inland Power Company • Retail Theft Prevention Training - Cinder • Handgun Safety - First Light Wilderness Group • Local laws and crime trends - Fairchild Air Force Base • Security Assessment - FedEx Ground ❖ The Crime Prevention Unit assisted and participated in the following community activities: • 1st Annual Parade of Lights • 7th Annual Dia de Los Muertos • Spokane Valley Rotary Celebration of Lights • Sun City Trunk or Treat • Spokane Valley Fire Bike Rodeo ❖ Assisted in the design and security plan for the development and construction of Balfour Park integrating Crime Prevention through Environmental Design (CPTED). 69 Spokane Valley Police Department Hiring/Recruitment ❖ Additional staff added to SVPD in 2021: ■ 2 New Major Crimes Detectives ■ 1 New Homeless Outreach Officer ❖ Complete overhaul of our recruiting efforts nationally including videos, website, and outreach ❖ Hired 31 deputies (15 entry level and 16 laterals) out of 758 completed applications received. 70 Spokane Valley Police Department Technology ❖ Addition of Live 911 Software ❖ Equipped Patrol cars with the Perimeter Alert System for increased officer safety ❖ Night vision program expanded significantly for SWAT ❖ ASU Drone with FLIR technology ❖ Radiological detection equipment for EDU ❖ Addition of Livescan fingerprint machine for Valley Precinct ❖ New Advanced Fingerprint Evidence processing equipment ❖ Body cameras purchased, tested, trained and equipped for all commissioned officers ❖ Five additional pole cameras for investigations 71 Spokane Valley Police Department Purchases ❖ White Elephant property purchased for future precinct replacement along with purchase of vehicle processing building next door ❖ Completion of new gas mask and ballistic helmet/face shield deployments ❖ New Glock 45X 9mm pistols and equipment ❖ New Glock 45X UTM training pistols ❖ New Axon tasers ❖ Pepperball less lethal weapons for all Patrol deputies and tactical units ❖ Ballistic Shields for Patrol sergeants ❖ Response Vehicle/Command Post for Crisis Negotiation Unit ❖ Replacement of all Traffic Unit digital cameras 72 To: From: Re: DRAFT ADVANCE AGENDA as of May 18, 2022; 8:30 a.m. Please note this is a work in progress; items are tentative Council & Staff City Clerk, by direction of City Manager Draft Schedule for Upcoming Council Meetings May 31, 2022, Study Session, 6:00 p.m. ACTION ITEMS: 1. Second Reading Ordinance 22-008 Amending 2022 Budget — Chelsie Taylor 2. Second Reading Ordinance 22-009 Public Parking — Cary Driskell 3. Motion Consideration: Sprague Barker Intersection Bid Award — Gloria Mantz NON -ACTION ITEMS: 4. Mirabeau Vacant Parcel — John Bottelli 5. Signal Box Art Wraps — Lesli Brassfield 6. Advance Agenda — Mayor Haley 7. Info Only: (a) Co.Wide Planning Policies Draft Amendment; (b) Police Monthly Report June 7, 2022, Study Session, 6:00 p.m. Proclamation: LGBTQ+ Pride Month ACTION ITEMS: 1. First Reading Ordinance 22-010 Code Enforcement— Erik Lamb, Bill Helbig NON -ACTION ITEMS: 2. 6-year TIP — Adam Jackson 3. Impact Fees — Jerremy Clark 4. Master Speed Limit Schedule — Jerremy Clark 5. Compression Brakes — Jerremy Clark, Chief Ellis 6. Law Enforcement Collective Bargaining Update — Erik Lamb, Chief Ellis, Morgan 7. Hearing Examiner Rules Update — Cary Driskell, Tony Beattie 8. Advance Agenda — Mayor Haley [due Tue May 24] (10 minutes) (15 minutes) (5 minutes) (10 minutes) (10 minutes) (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting: 55 mins] Koudelka [due Tue May 31] (15 minutes) (10 minutes) (10 minutes) (10 minutes) (20 minutes) (10 minutes) (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting: 80 mins] June 14, 2022, Special Meeting: Budget Workshop 8:30 a.m.. [due Tue June 7] June 14, 2022, Special Meeting, 4:00 p.m. PUBLIC HEARING: 6-year TIP — Adam Jackson 1. Resolution 22- Adopting TIP — Adam Jackson 2. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) 3. Second Reading Ordinance 22-010 Code Enforcement — Erik Lamb 4. Resolution 22- Amending Master Speed Limit Schedule — Jerremy Clark 5. Admin Report: Code Text amendment, 0001, Community Service Regulations — Lori Barlow 6. Advance Agenda — Mayor Haley 7. Info Only: Noticing Requirements June 14, 2002 Regular, 6 pm Council Meeting Cancelled June 21-24: AWC Annual Conference, Vancouver, Wa. June 21, 2022, Study Session, 6:00 p.m. —Meeting Cancelled [due Tue June 7] (15 minutes) (5 minutes) (5 minutes) (10 minutes) (10 minutes) (10 minutes) (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting: 60 mins] June 28, 2022, Formal Meeting, 6:00 p.m. [due Tue June 21] 1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) (5 minutes) 2. First Reading Ordinance 22- , Code Text Amendment 0001, Community Service Regulations — L. Barlow (10 min) 3. Admin Report: Advance Agenda — Mayor Haley (5 minutes) 4. Info Only: Department Monthly Reports [*estimated meeting: mins] July 5, 2022, Study Session, 6:00 p.m. [due Tue June 28] Proclamation: Parks and Recreation Month ACTION ITEMS: 1. Second reading Ordinance 22- Code Text Amendment 0001, Community Service Regulations — Lori Barlow (5 min) Draft Advance Agenda 5/19/2022 3:25:41 PM Page 1 of 2 NON -ACTION ITEMS: 2. RCO Greenacres Update — John Bottelli 3. Advance Agenda — Mayor Haley July 12, 2022, Formal Meeting, 6:00 p.m. 1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) 2. Admin Report: Advance Agenda — Mayor Haley July 19, 2022, Study Session, 6:00 p.m. 1. Council Goals & Priorities for Use of Lodging Tax — Chelsie Taylor 2. Advance Agenda — Mayor Haley July 26, 2022, Formal Meeting, 6:00 p.m. Proclamation: National Night Out 1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) 2. Admin Report: Advance Agenda — Mayor Haley 3. Info Only: Department Monthly Reports (10 minutes) (5 minutes) [due Tue July 5] (5 minutes) (5 minutes) [due Tue July 12] (10 minutes) (5 minutes) [due Tue July 19] (5 minutes) (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting: mins] August 2, 2022, Study Session, 6:00 p.m. — meeting cancelled (National Night Out) August 9, 2022, Formal Meeting, 6:00 p.m. 1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) 2. Admin Report: Advance Agenda — Mayor Haley August 16, 2022, Study Session, 6:00 p.m. ACTION ITEMS: 1. Motion Consideration: Council Goals & Priorities NON -ACTION ITEMS: 2. Advance Agenda — Mayor Haley August 23, 2022, Formal Meeting, 6:00 p.m. 1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) 2. Admin Report: 2323 Budget, Estimated Revenues 3. Admin Report: Advance Agenda — Mayor Haley 4. Info Only: Department Monthly Reports August 30, 2022, Study Session, 6:00 p.m. 1. Advance Agenda — Mayor Haley *time for public or Council comments not included OTHER PENDING AND/OR UPCOMING Appleway Trail Amenities Basement space Castle Park CDBG Interlocal Consolidated Homeless Grant Continuum of Care (info item?) Core Beliefs Resolution Gov. Auth. Emergencies (info) Mirabeau Park Forestry Mgmt. Neighborhood Restoration Noticing requirements (info) for Use of Lodging Tax — Chelsie Taylor & Expenditures — Chelsie Taylor [due Tue Aug 2] (5 minutes) (5 minutes) [due Tue Aug 2] (15 minutes) (5 minutes) [due Tue Aug 16] (5 minutes) (15 minutes) (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting: mins] [due Tue Aug 23] (5 minutes) ISSUES/MEETINGS: Park Lighting PFD Presentation Prosecutor Services Residency SCRAPS Update St. Illumination (owners, cost, location) St. O&M Pavement Preservation Vehicle Wgt Infrastructure Impact Water Districts & Green Space Way Finding Signs Draft Advance Agenda 5/19/2022 3:25:41 PM Page 2 of 2 City of Spokane Valley Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 4/1/2022 - 4/30/2022 Page Title 1 Cover Sheet 2 Pre -Application Meeting Requested 3 Construction Applications Received 4 Engineering Applications Received 5 Land Use Applications Received 6 Construction Permits Issued 7 Engineering Permits Issued 8 Land Use Applications Completed 9 Inspections Performed 10 Code Enforcement 11 Revenue 12 Building Permit Valuations Created On: 5/9/2022 Page 1 of 12 Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 4/1/2022 - 4/30/2022 Pre -Application Meeting Requested A Pre -Application Meeting is a service provided to help our customers identify the code requirements related to their project proposal Community & Public Works Department scheduled a total of 10 Pre -Application Meetings in APRIL 2022 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Spokane Valley Pre -Application Meeting Requests I I I. Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec ■ Commercial Pre-App Land Use Pre-App ■ ** NOT SUBMITTED Commercial Pre-App Land Use Pre-App ** NOT SUBMITTED Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 5 6 18 7 7 10 5 3 1 2 3 0 Monthly Totals 12 16 23 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Annual -To -Date: 61 ** NOT SUBMITTED is a new category created by SmartGov which separates permits that have not entered details or provided documents for reviev Created On: 5/9/2022 Page 2 of 12 Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 4/1/2022 - 4/30/2022 Construction Applications Received The applications recevied are those that include projects for New, remodeled, and accessory buildings; Signs, Factory Assembled Structures (FAS), Trade, Roofs, and more. Community & Public Works Department recevied a total of 449 Construction Applications in APRIL 2022 600 400 200 0 Spokane Valley Construction Applications Received iii Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec • Commercial New Commercial TI • Commercial Trade • Residential New • Residential Remodel • Residential Trade u Residential Accessory Demolition Sign Factory Assembled • Other Construction ** NOT SUBMITTED • Re -Roof *Other Construction applications include, Adult family Home Inspections, Cell tower modifications, solar panels, swimming pool/hot tub Jan 23 Feb 9 Mar 7 Apr 23 May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Commercial New Commercial TI 13 14 24 16 Commercial Trade 48 23 28 34 Residential New 19 20 9 29 Residential Remodel 17 13 23 16 Residential Trade 150 164 182 219 Residential Accessory 13 7 22 17 Demolition 4 3 7 3 Sign 10 10 4 9 Re -Roof 31 45 89 78 Factory Assembled 2 0 3 1 Other Construction 9 16 5 4 ** NOT SUBMITTED 38 60 41 403 47 449 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Monthly Totals 339 324 Annual -To -Date: 1515 ** NOT SUBMITTED is a new category created by SmartGov which separates permits that have not entered details or provided documents for reviev Created On: 5/9/2022 Page 3 of 12 Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 4/1/2022 - 4/30/2022 Engineering Applications Received The applications received are those that include projects for all site work projects, such as Grading permits, Right -of -Way (ROW), approaches, and more. Community & Public Works Department received a total of 111 Engineering Applications in APRIL 2022 Engineering Applications Received 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 7 Jan • Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec • Engineered Grading Regular Grading Right -of -Way 11 Approach • Clearing Et Grubbing • **NOT SUBMITTED Jan 10 Feb 5 Mar 9 Apr 8 May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Engineered Grading Regular Grading 0 0 1 2 Right -of -Way 62 92 93 95 Approach 0 9 14 6 Clearing & Grubbing 1 0 0 0 **NOT SUBMITTED 4 73 5 106 6 117 10 111 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Monthly Totals Annual -To -Date: 407 ** NOT SUBMITTED is a new category created by SmartGov which separates permits that have not entered details or provided documents for reviev Created On: 5/9/2022 Page 4 of 12 Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 4/1/2022 - 4/30/2022 Land Use Applications Received The applications received are those that include projects that involve land development, such as Platting actions, Boundary Lines Adjustments, Zoning, SEPA and Exceptions Community & Public Works Department received a total of 62 Land Use Applications in APRIL 2022 100 80 60 40 20 0 Spokane Valley Land Use Applications Received Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec • Boundary Line Adj Short Plat • Long Plat • Binding Site Plan • Final Platting ■ Zoning/Comp Amend •Accessory Dwelling SEPA Admin Exception •Admin Interpretation Home Business Lic • Other Development ** NOT SUBMITTED ** Other Development could include, Zoning Letter, Floodplain, Shoreline, Alterations, Variances, Small Cell, CUP, Street Vacations, etc... Jan 6 Feb 2 Mar 4 Apr 4 May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Boundary Line Adj Short Plat 3 1 3 5 Long Plat 1 1 1 1 Binding Site Plan 1 0 1 0 Final Platting 4 4 5 3 Zoning/Comp Amend 0 1 0 0 Accessory Dwelling 1 0 2 1 SEPA 1 0 2 0 Admin Exception 2 0 3 0 Admin Interpretation 0 0 1 0 Home Business Lic 53 60 56 43 Other Development 2 2 8 5 ** NOT SUBMITTED 5 74 11 82 7 93 14 62 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Monthly Totals Annual -To -Date: 311 ** NOT SUBMITTED is a new category created by SmartGov which separates permits that have not entered details or provided documents for reviev Created On: 5/9/2022 Page 5 of 12 Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 4/1/2022 - 4/30/2022 Construction Permits Issued The applications issued are those that include projects for New, remodeled, and accessory buildings; Signs, Factory Assembled Structures (FAS), Trade, Roofs, and more. Community & Public Works Department Issued a total of 396 Construction Permits in APRIL 2022 500 400 300 200 100 0 Spokane Valley Construction Permits Issued ■ 1 • 111111111111111111111111111111 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec • Commercial New Commercial TI • Commercial Trade • Residential New • Residential Remodel • Residential Trade • Residential Accessory Demolition Sign • Re -Roof Factory Assembled • Other Construction* *Other Construction applications include, Adult family Home Inspections, Cell tower modifications, swimming pool/hot tub Jan 6 Feb 0 Mar 7 Apr 10 May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Commercial New Commercial TI 3 2 20 14 Commercial Trade 44 23 11 34 Residential New 8 6 5 15 Residential Remodel 7 8 16 13 Residential Trade 147 158 172 188 Residential Accessory 4 0 18 17 Demolition 3 3 6 4 Sign 6 6 3 7 Re -Roof 31 44 89 77 Factory Assembled 1 0 2 1 Other Construction* 3 263 9 259 5 354 16 396 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Monthly Totals Annual -To -Date: 1272 Created On: 5/9/2022 Page 6 of 12 Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 4/1/2022 - 4/30/2022 Engineering Permits Issued The applications issued are those that include projects for all site work projects, such as Grading permits, Right -of -Way (ROW), approaches, and more. Community & Public Works Department issued a total of 128 Engineering permits in APRIL 2022 Engineering Permits Issued 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 1 1 1 • Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec ■ Engineered Grading Regular Grading Right -of -Way 1 i Approach ■Clearing Et Grubbing Engineered Grading Regular Grading Right -of -Way Approach Clearing & Grubbing Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 0 0 2 12 0 0 1 1 54 75 75 105 0 8 9 10 1 0 0 Monthly Totals 55 83 87 128 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Annual -To -Date: 353 Created On: 5/9/2022 Page 7 of 12 Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 4/1/2022 - 4/30/2022 Land Use Applications Completed The applications completed are those that include projects that involve land development, such as Platting actions, Boundary Line Adjustments, Zoning, SEPA and Exceptions Community & Public Works Department completed a total of 37 Land Use Applications in APRIL 2022 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Spokane Valley Land Use Applications Completed �I 1 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec • Boundary Line Adj ■ Final Platting Admin Exception Short Plat • Long Plat • Binding Site Plan ■ Zoning/Comp Amend ®Accessory Dwelling SEPA • Admin Interpretation Home Business Lic •Other Development ** Other Development could include, Zoning Letter, Floodplain, Shoreline, Alterations, Variances, Small Cell, CUP, Street Vacations, etc... Jan 0 Feb 0 Mar 0 Apr 0 May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Boundary Line Adj Short Plat 0 0 0 0 Long Plat 0 0 0 0 Binding Site Plan 0 0 0 0 Final Platting 0 0 0 0 Zoning/Comp Amend 0 0 0 0 Accessory Dwelling 0 0 1 0 SEPA 0 0 0 0 Admin Exception 2 0 3 0 Admin Interpretation 0 0 1 0 Home Business Lic 41 50 51 33 Other Development 2 45 1 51 2 58 4 37 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Monthly Totals Annual -To -Date: 191 Created On: 5/9/2022 Page 8 of 12 Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 4/1/2022 - 4/30/2022 Development Inspections Performed Community & Public Works Department performed a total of 1831 Development Inspections in APRIL 2022. Development Inspections include building, planning, engineering and ROW 2000 1800 1600 1400 1000 1000 800 600 400 200 0 Spokane Valley Development Inspections Performed Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec t 2020 2021 2022 2022 2021 2020 Jan Feb Mar Apr 1078 1252 927 991 1011 1011 1215 1845 1625 1260 1831 May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Totals 1758 1661 1533 1617 1550 1253 1345 1473 1372 857 1,215 1260 857 1503 1745 1503 1745 1846 1622 1846 1622 1489 1461 1489 1461 1173 1104 1173 1104 6,006 17,105 16,286 16,286 Annual -To -Date: 16,286 Created On: 5/9/2022 Page 9 of 12 Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 4/1/2022 - 4/30/2022 Code Enforcement Code Enforcement Officers responded to 39 citizen requests in the month of APRIL 2022. They are listed by type below. Please remember that all complaints, even those that have no violation, must be investigated 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Code Enforcement Complaints Investigated Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec ■ CE-Stop Work Order Complaint (Non -Violent) Environmental 11 General ■ Nuisance ■ Property Jan 0 Feb 0 Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec CE-Stop Work Order Complaint (Non-violent) 0 0 Environmental 1 0 1 1 General 3 0 1 Nuisance 34 29 57 26 Property 6 44 7 36 15 73 11 39 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Monthly Totals Annual -To -Date: 192 Created On: 5/9/2022 Page 10 of 12 Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 4/1/2022 - 4/30/2022 Revenue Community & Public Works Department Revenue, which are fees taken in on all applications, totaled $210,513 in APRIL 2022. $1,200,000 $1,000,000 $800,000 $600,000 $400,000 $200,000 $0 Jan Spokane Valley Revenue Received Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec t 2022 2021 5-Yr Trend Jan $173,509 Feb $139,945 Mar $171,413 Apr $210,513 May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Totals 2022 $695,380 5-Yr Trend $366,357 $218,434 $271,256 $264,059 $285,589 $266,794 $282,184 $284,416 $244,563 $282,804 $255,050 $246,424 $3,267,931 2021 $1,087,310 $196,293 $364,569 $459,905 $239,948 $367,253 $433,461 $430,383 $323,636 $396,162 $292,643 $329,244 $4,920,807 2020 $230,256 $402,862 $371,956 $237,120 $402,525 $309,668 $226,943 $188,990 $268,487 $254,775 $246,368 $223,685 $3,363,635 2019 $162,441 $228,717 $265,529 $195,244 $241,906 $233,496 $355,943 $304,988 $228,157 $294,794 $299,906 $349,821 $3,160,942 2018 $177,431 $117,425 $220,845 $206,090 $234,009 $158,168 $260,179 $362,478 $253,342 $270,649 $204,016 $169,751 $2,634,383 2017 $174,349 $146,874 $133,382 $221,935 $309,558 $265,383 $134,394 $135,242 $149,194 $197,639 $232,319 $159,618 $2,259,887 Created On: 5/9/2022 Page 11 of 12 Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 4/1/2022 -4/30/2022 Building Permit Valuation Community & Public Works Department building permit valuation, which include, residential, commercial, reroof, FAS placed, totaled $32,649,784 in APRIL 2022. $200,000,000 $180,000,000 $160,000,000 $140,000,000 $120,000,000 $100,000,000 $80,000,000 $60,000,000 $40,000,000 $20,000,000 $0 Jan Feb Mar Spokane Valley Permit Valuation Apr May Jun Jul Aug —6-2022 t 5-Yr Trend —8-2021 Sep Oct Nov Dec Totals Jan $20,182,361 Feb $31,376,013 Mar $14,935,549 Apr $32,649,784 May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Totals 2022 $99,143,707 5-YrTrend $14,662,000 $49,352,000 $71,170,000 $22,362,000 $28,434,000 $26,908,000 $33,764,000 $17,058,000 $16,542,000 $21,406,000 $34,474,000 $18,254,000 $263.30M 2021 $8,860,000 $179,080,000 $16,720,000 $32,820,000 $22,430,000 $27,700,000 $65,190,000 $24,390,000 $18,160,000 $42,670,000 $17,710,000 $13,480,000 $469.21M 2020 $22,130,000 $20,750,000 $36,690,000 $27,670,000 $51,380,000 $29,930,000 $17,950,000 $7,610,000 $20,620,000 $15,270,000 $26,890,000 $21,380,000 $298.27M 2019 $5,660,000.00 $22,210,000.00 $19,460,000.00 $12,460,000.00 $23,150,000.00 $15,020,000.00 $46,650,000.00 $18,800,000.00 $14,360,000.00 $17,160,000.00 $35,210,000.00 $32,930,000.00 $263.07M 2018 $12,840,000.00 $6,350,000.00 $276,000,000.00 $7,870,000.00 $9,550,000.00 $26,260,000.00 $29,250,000.00 $25,440,000.00 $20,690,000.00 $21,880,000.00 $25,460,000.00 $6,700,000.00 $219.89M 2017 $23,820,000.00 $18,370,000.00 $6,980,000.00 $30,990,000.00 $35,660,000.00 $35,630,000.00 $9,780,000.00 $9,050,000.00 $8,880,000.00 $10,050,000.00 $67,100,000.00 $16,780,000.00 $2573.09M Created On: 5/9/2022 Page 12 of 12 Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 04/01/22 — 04/30/22 MAINTENANCE Agreements for Services Adopted and In Operation (** Does not include April) Contract Name Contractor Contract Amoun Total Expended % of Contract Expended Street Maintenance Street Sweeping Storm Drain Cleaning Landscaping Weed Spraying Emergency Traffic Control Litter and Weed Control State Highway Maintenance Traffic Signals, Signs, Striping Dead Animal Control Poe Asphalt AAA Sweeping AAA Sweeping Senske Clearwa Senske Geiger WSDOT Spokane CourMIMI Mike Pederson $1,530,307.70 $584,875.20 $211,586.44 $94,136.00 $39,000.00 $15,000.00 $70,000.00 $209,000.00 $700,000.00 $20,000.00 $20,526.03 $95,706.35 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $2,125.72 $7,985.65 $62,890.15 $76,000.86 $4,500.00 1.34% 16.36% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 14.17% 11.41% 30.09% 10.86% 22.50% NEEEMINEEE Snow Season - October 2021 - April 2022 On Call - Graders On Call - Plow Drivers On Call - Sidewalk Operator Multiple Multiple Valley Landscape $550,000.00 $620,000.00 $40,000.00 $116,265.90 $247,404.83 $17,458.14 21.14% 39.90% 43.65% Citizen Requests for Public Works - April 2022 1 Request Submitted In Progress Resolved / Waiting roken Sprinkler onstruction - CPW ead Animal Removal owned Tree / Branch eneral Street Maint ravel Shouldering azard on Street Ilegal Dum.;, eport a Pothole . coote rs .hopping Cart treet Sweeping............................. SOLID WASTE STORMWATER 1 4 2 8 8 1 5 4 4 4 1 3 2 1 12 20 44 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 1 4 2 8 6 1 5 4 4 4 1 3 1 1 11 20 42 Totals 124 6 118 STREET MAINTENANCE ACTIVITY The following is a summary of Contractor maintenance activities in the City of Spokane Valley for April 2022: • Geiger Work Crew — Vegetation management, litter and garbage pickup, sidewalk snow removal. • Pothole patching, tree trimming, graffiti removal, cracksealing. • Poe Maintenance Contract — Operations to start in April. • AAA sweeping Contract —Arterial maintenance sweeping continues. Began residential sweeping. • AAA Sweeping Vactor Contract — Complete until spring of 2022. WASTEWATER Status of the process can be monitored at: http://www.spokaneriver.net/, http://www.ecy.wa.gov/geographic/spokane/spokane river basin.htm, http://www.spokanecounty.org/utilities/WaterReclamation/content.aspx?c=2224 and http://www.spokaneriverpartners.com/ STORMWATER UTILITY The following is a summary of City Stormwater Utility activities for April 2022: • Drywell Retrofit with Pavement Preservation (Dept. of Ecology grant) — Remaining funds project to be used in association with the Sullivan -Sprague to 8th preservation project. Proceeding with 90% design for future submittal to Ecology for approval. • Spokane Valley Regional Decant Facility Canopy project (Dept. of Ecology grant): Current suspension of working days. An extension of the agreement expiration date was approved by the Department of Ecology. The approved expiration date is extended to June 30, 2022. Completion of the project is expected to begin near the end of April. • Appleway Stormwater Improvement project (Dept. of Ecology grant): Project construction nearly complete. Remaining punch -list items currently being completed. Project close-out tasks provided to Ecology for review. • Sprague Ave. University to Park Stormwater Improvement Project — Osborn Consulting is providing services to develop Department of Ecology required Design Report. Design Report submitted to Ecology on February 9th for review. Design Report review comments received 3/23/22. • RFQ issued for a Stormwater Utility comprehensive program study and rate study. Osborn Consulting selected to provide services for this study. City currently reviewing and revising scope of services. • Continue process to identify the merits for jurisdictional coverage under the UIC program. Primary focus is on the City-wide hydraulic analysis. • Ad -HOC lead role — MS4/UIC regulation - assessment of current permit language. • AD -HOC participation role — Erosion Control — municipal permit requirements vs. General Construction Stormwater Permit requirements — assessment of current permit language. • Ecology review - brief description of proposed effectiveness study (Bioretention soil media study). This study is a collaborative effort with City of Spokane, Spokane County, and Osborne Consultant. City of Spokane is the lead entity. • Continue updating the Stormwater Utility 0 & M plan for both UIC and MS4 areas. • Participation and support Glenrose, Central Park Flood Insurance Study. • Submitted 2022 MS4 Stormwater Management Plan. • Submitted 2021 MS4 Annual Report. • Continued annual management and/or participation of the following service contracts: o Roadway Landscape Maintenance Contract — Senske. o Street Sweeping Contract — AAA Sweeping. o Storm Drain Cleaning Contract — AAA Sweeping. o Roadway Weed Control Contract — Clearwater Summit. • Continue working on the following tasks: o Responded to stormwater related issues, 10 sites. Recorded in QAlert. 2 DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING The following is a summary of Development Engineering activities for April 2022: • Assisted Building and Planning Division with preparation of design requirements for (6) Commercial and (3) Land Use Pre -Application meetings. • Prepared multiple Recommended Conditions of Approvals for preliminary plats and Dedication Languages for final plats. Reviewed multiple final plats and submittal packages to record final plats. • Reviewed civil plans and drainage reports for Engineered Grading Permits associated with commercial and land use projects. Coordinated with private Engineers and Developers. • Spoke with and emailed citizens and developers to answer inquiries and discuss design requirements for potential commercial and land use projects. • Conducted preconstruction meetings, performed site visits, prepared punch lists, reviewed surety estimates, and reviewed and approved construction certification packages to finalize final plats and to issue commercial building certificates of occupancy. • Reviewed civil plans for the following projects: o Shiva Business Park (EGR-2021-0021) o Kilgore Office Addition (EGR-2021-0079) o Powell Building (EGR-2021-0093) o Old Milwaukee II — 6 lots (EGR-2021-0095) o Greenacres Residential Care (EGR-2021-0101) o Barajas Short Plat — 5 lots (EGR-2021-0108) o SVFD Maintenance Facility (EGR-2022-0004) o Riverside Place at Coyote Rock Phase 2 (EGR-2022-0010) o Hodges North — 24 lots (EGR-2022-0014) o Mirabeau Multi -Family (EGR-2022-0016) o Rodriguez Short Plat — 9 lots (EGR-2022-0020) o Argonne Apartments (EGR-2022-0022) o Circle M Landscape Phase 2 (EGR-2022-0026) o 8th & Carnahan Geotech Investigation (EGR-2022-0023) o Mithril Manor— 22 lots (EGR-2022-0024) o Nora Multi -Family (EGR-2022-0027) o Station Junction (EGR-2022-0028) o Olive Short Plat — 3 lots (EGR-2022-0030) o Dishman Estates — 21 lots (EGR-2022-0031) o Saw Vercler Short Plat — 9 lots (EGR-2022-0032) o Murphy Apartments (EGR-2022-0033) o McDonald Road Short Plat — 5 lots (EGR-2022-0034) o 10th & 12t" Short Plat — 8 lots (EGR-2022-0035) 3 CAPITAL PROJECTS Spokane .0jVal ley Public Works Projects Monthly Summary - Design & Construction April-2022 Proposed Bid % Estimated Total Project# Design &Construction Projects Funding Open Complete Construction Project Ad Date Date PE I CN Completion Cost Street Projects 0143 Barker Rd/BNSF Grade Separation FHWA - STP( U) 11/30/20 01/13/21 100 58 12/31/22 $26,000,000 0205 Sprague/Barker Intersection Improvement FHWA- CMAQ 04/26/22 05/20/22 100 0 12/31/22 $ 2,300,000 0249 Sullivan &Wellesley Intersection Improv FHWA- STP(U) 10/21/21 11/17/21 100 0 12/31/22 $ 1,370,000 0275 Barker Rd Widening- River to Euclid FHWA - STP(U) 06/12/20 07/08/20 100 99 12/31/21 $ 3,850,141 0299 Argonne Rd Concrete Pvmt Indiana to Mont TIB - UAP 04/30/21 05/14/21 100 99 12/31/21 $ 2,800,000 0300 Pines & Mission Intersection Improvement FHWA- CMAQ TBD TBD 80 0 12/31/22 $ 588,000 0301 Park Rd. Sidewalk COSV 02/26/21 03/19/21 100 100 12/31/21 $ 733,000 0310 Sullivan Rd Overcrossing UP RR Deck Rep. FHWA- BR 03/19/21 04/09/21 100 100 12/31/21 $ 337,625 0313 Barker Road/Union Pacific Crossing FMSIB 08/20/21 09/10/21 100 75 12/31/22 $ 1,434,000 0318 Wilbur Sidewalk: Boone to Mission STBG-SA TBD TBD 100 0 12/31/22 $ 80,000 0335 Mission Ave over Evergreen Rd Deck Repair FHWA- BR TBD TBD 0 0 12/31/23 $ 35,248 Street Preservation Projects 0292 Mullan Preservation: Broadway -Mission COSV 05/21/21 06/04/21 100 100 12/31/21 $ 2,100,000 0309 Local Access Streets: Barker Homes COSV 04/24/20 05/20/20 100 100 12/31/21 $ 1,812,088 0320 Sullivan Preservation: Sprague-8th COSV TBD TBD 75 0 12/31/23 $ 138,000 0323 Evergreen Road Preservation Project COSV 04/30/21 05/14/21 100 99 12/31/21 $ 1,900,000 0325 2021 Local Access Streets: South Park Rd COSV 06/11/21 06/25/21 100 100 12/31/21 $ 1,200,000 0333 Evergreen Rd Pres Broadway to Mission COSV 02/11/22 02/25/22 100 25 12/31/22 $ 1,341,000 0334 Sprague Ave Preservation STBG 03/18/22 04/08/22 100 0 12/31/22 $ 142,540 0339 2022 Local Access Streets: Summerfield E COSV TBD TBD 50 0 12/31/22 $ 1,377,400 0341 Broadway Preservation- Fancherto Park STBG/COSV TBD TBD 0 0 12/31/23 $ 140,000 0343 Buckeye Avenue Sewer Extension CLRF 03/18/22 04/08/22 100 0 12/31/22 $ 500,000 Traffic Projects 0293 2018 CSS Citywide Reflective Signal BP HSIP N/A N/A 100 97 12/31/21 $ 180,000 0294 Citywide Reflective Post Panels HSIP N/A N/A 100 99 12/31/21 $ 78,000 0326 2020Citywide Reflective Post Panels HSIP TBD TBD 65 0 12/31/22 $ 164,100 0330 WTSC 2021 School Zone Beacons WTSC N/A N/A 0 0 12/31/22 $ 60,000 0342 WTSC 2022 School Zone Beacons WTSC N/A N/A 0 0 12/31/22 $ 225,000 Parks Projects 0314 Balfour Park Frontage Improvements COSV 03/19/21 04/09/21 100 99 12/31/21 $ 1,003,215 0315 Brown's Park 2020 Improvements COSV Re -Bid 10/23/20 11/13/20 100 100 06/30/21 $ 562,780 0316 Balfour Park Improvements- Phase 1 COSV 2/18/2022 3/11/2022 100 0 TBD $ 217,500 0328 Sullivan Park Waterline COSV TBD TBD 85 0 TBD $ 152,858 0338 Loop Trail Project COSV TBD TBD 0 0 TBD $ 10,000 Stormwater Projects 0308 Regional Decant Facility Canopy Dept of Ecology 02/05/21 02/19/21 100 70 12/31/21 $ 595,535 0317 ApplewayStormwaterlmprovements Dept of Ecology 04/30/21 05/21/21 100 99 12/31/21 $ 2,002,256 0327 Sprague Avenue Stormwater Improvements Dept of Ecology TBD TBD 35 0 12/31/22 $ 150,000 Design % Total Project# Design Only Projects Funding Complete Complete Project Date PE Cost Street Projects 0223 Pines Rd Underpass @ BNSF &Trent FHWA- STP(U) 12/31/21 0311 Sullivan Rd./SR 290Interchange Project COSV 12/31/23 0321 Argonne Corridor Imprv- North of Knox COSV 12/31/21 0329 Barker Road Imp- City Limits to Appleway IMPACT FEES 12/31/21 0340 8th Ave Sidewalk (Coleman to Park) TIB/COSV 03/31/22 Street Preservation Projects 0286 Broadway Preservation: Havana to Fancher COSV On Hold 0341 Broadway Preservation- Fancherto Park STBG/COSV 03/31/23 Sewer Projects 0332 NE Industrial Area - Sewer Extension COSV 12/31/21 30 20 10 5 0 70 0 $ 7,295,000 $ 500,000 $ 30,000 $ 250,000 $ 434,400 $ 67,600 $ 140,000 5 $ 80,000 Other Projects 0336 Fair and Expo Center Expansion COSV 12/31/23 0 $ 1,000,000 4 PLANNING AND GRANTS Congressionally Directed Spending (CDS) In 2021, staff submitted multiple requests for the City's priority projects identified on its Legislative Agenda. The City was awarded $3 million for the South Barker Road Corridor thanks to Senator Murray's sponsorship of the project. Contract documents have yet to be issued to the City regarding the funding. In 2022, Senator Murray, Senator Cantwell, and Representative McMorris Rodgers, have all announced updated calls for funding via the CDS budgeting process. On March 29, Council authorized staff to submit its four Legislative Agenda projects. The City's four CDS requests were submitted to each of our federal delegates April. Safe Routes to School (SRTS) and Pedestrian & Bicycle Program (PBP) In 2020, Council authorized staff to submit PBP and SRTS applications. The City was not successful in funding at the time. However, as part of the 2022 state budget, the legislature increased funding to the SRTS and PBP programs; allowing PBP and SRTS funding to be awarded to the City for the previously submitted Bowdish sidewalk project and City hall pedestrian crossing improvement project. In April and May, City Council approved staff to accept these funding awards from the 2020 call for projects. Staff will coordinate with WSDOT on project initiation in May 2022. Around mid -March 2022, SRTS and PBP announced a new call for projects for the SRTS and PBP. Staff is evaluating eligible projects for these programs and will come forward to Council on May 3, to discuss a potential City application for funding. Nationally Significant Multimodal Freight and Highways Projects (INFRA) The United States Dept. of Transportation (USDOT) announced its next call for projects for the INFRA program. This year, the call is bundled with two other programs: National Infrastructure Project Assistance (MEGA) and Rural Surface Transportation Grant program (Rural). The City only has an eligible project for the INFRA program. In 2020 and 2021, the City submitted joint INFRA applications with Spokane County for the funding of the Bigelow - Sullivan Corridor. In 2022, Spokane County has secured sufficient funding such that it is not interested in a partnership application to INFRA for the Bigelow -Sullivan Corridor. As a result, the City has two eligible projects: Pines Road/BNSF Grade Separation Project and Sullivan -Trent Interchange project. In discussion with City Council at an April 19, 2022, administrative report, staff recommended that the City opt not to apply to the INFRA program. The City's eligible projects did not appear to be competitive. Council consensus agreed with this recommendation and no application was submitted. Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) On April 14, staff submitted to the Dept. of Commerce a 60-day notice of intent to adopt its Six -Year TIP. Staff has developed its new TIP for years 2023-2028 and will present its draft document to City Council in an administrative report on June 7. A subsequent public hearing is scheduled for June 14. Overall Grants Summary Through April 2022, the City has submitted 29 unique grant applications to six different funding programs. Awards for these grants are anticipated in late -summer or fall 2022. Upcoming anticipated grant programs that staff will consider submitting applications include the following (application release dates are yet to be determined): 1. Safe Streets and Roads for All (SS4A) 2. Railway Crossing Elimination Program 3. Consolidated Rail Infrastructure and Safety Improvements (CRISI) 4. Reconnecting Communities Pilot Program (RCP) 5. Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) 6. Transportation Improvement Board (TIB) 5