The URL can be used to link to this page

2023, 05-30 Study Session AgendaAGENDA SPOKANE VALLEY CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING STUDY SESSION FORMAT Tuesday, May 30, 2023 6:00 p.m. Remotely via ZOOM Meeting and In Person at CenterPlace Regional Event Center Great Room 2426 N Discovery Place Spokane Valley, WA 99216 Council Requests Please Silence Your Cell Phones During Council Meeting NOTE: Members of the public may attend Spokane Valley Council meetings in -person at the address provided above, or via Zoom at the link below. Members of the public will be allowed to comment in - person or via Zoom as described below. Public comments will only be accepted for those items noted on the agenda as "public comment opportunity." If making a comment via Zoom, comments must be received by 4:00 pm the day of the meeting. • Sign up to Provide Oral Public Comment at the Meeting via Calling -In • Submit Written Public Comment Prior to the Meeting • Join the Zoom WEB Meeting CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL APPROVAL OF AGENDA GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT OPPORTUNITY: This is an opportunity for the public to speak on any subject except agenda action items, as public comments will be taken on those items where indicated. Please keep comments to matters within the jurisdiction of the City Government. This is not an opportunity for questions or discussion. Diverse points of view are welcome but please keep remarks civil. Remarks will be limited to three minutes per person. To comment via zoom: use the link above for oral or written comments as per those directions. To comment at the meeting in person: speakers may sign in to speak but it is not required. A sign -in sheet will be provided at the meeting. ACTION ITEMS: 1. Second Reading Ordinance 23-011 Amending 2023 Budget Chelsie Taylor [no public comments; public hearing previously held] 2. First Reading Ordinance, 23-012 STV 23-01, Oaks Academy Street Vacation — Levi Basinger [no public comments; public hearing previously held] 3. Motion Consideration: Broadway & Park Intersection Bid Award — Rob Lochmiller [public comment opportunity] 4. Motion Consideration: Interlocal Agreement w/Water District #3 — Rob Lochmiller [public comment opportunity] 5. Motion Consideration: Summerfield E Neighborhood Preservation Bid Award — Rob Lochmiller [public comment opportunity] 6. Motion Consideration: Broadway Preservation PH 1 Bid Award — Rob Lochmiller [public comment opportunity] 7. Motion Consideration: Spokane Regional Transportation Council, Request for Projects — Gloria Mantz [public comment opportunity] Council Agenda May 30, 2023 Page 1 of 2 NON -ACTION ITEMS: 8. Legislative Update — Virginia Clough, Briahna Murray 9. Library Building Update — Patrick Roewe 10. Homeless Plan Update — Eric Robison 11. Regional Homeless Entity, Update — Gloria Mantz 12. Parks Maintenance Update — John Bottelli 13. Advance Agenda — Mayor Haley COUNCIL COMMENTS CITY MANAGER COMMENTS ADJOURN Council Agenda May 30, 2023 Page 2 of 2 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: May 30, 2023 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ® new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Second reading of proposed Ordinance #23-011 which amends the 2023 Budget. GOVERNING LEGISLATION: In order for the City to amend an adopted budget, State law requires the Council to approve an ordinance that appropriates additional funds. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: The Council last took formal action on the 2023 Budget when it was adopted on November 8, 2022. On May 16, 2023, an Administrative Report was delivered to Council regarding the need for a budget amendment. On May 23, 2023, a public hearing was held on this topic and Ordinance #23-011 was advanced to a second reading. BACKGROUND: Since the initial adoption of the 2023 Budget on November 8, 2022, a number of events have transpired in the normal course of operations that necessitate a 2023 Budget amendment. They include: #001 - General Fund Revenues reflect an increase of $4,609,000, including: • $39,000 in grant proceeds for furniture and equipment at the Precinct. • $50,000 for the Spokane County share of the Plante's Ferry Study. • $4,520,000 for anticipated Coronavirus Local Recovery Funding (CLFR) revenue recognition. Provide additional appropriations (expenditures) of $13,506,196 comprised of: • $282,192 increase in salaries, payroll taxes, and benefits costs across all Departments related to the 3% pay increase authorized by City Council at the December 20, 2022 council meeting. • $168,269 increase in salaries, payroll taxes, and benefit costs in the City Manager Department as a result of truing up a previously vacant position to actual amounts and moving the Public Information Officer to this Department from Economic Development. • $23,300 increase in recruitment related costs in the Human Resources Department due to increased recruiting activities, including the City Attorney recruitment costs. • $272,187 decrease in salaries, payroll taxes, and benefit costs in the Engineering Department related to adjusting employee allocations related to the new Stormwater staffing increases. • $9,560 increase in Engineering Department costs related to the new Stormwater staffing increases. • $153,789 decrease in salaries, payroll taxes, and benefits in the Economic Development Department related to moving the Public Information Officer from this department to City Manager. • $9,000 increase in professional services in the Economic Development Department for additional videos for the State of the City event. • $89,226 increase in salaries, payroll taxes, and benefit costs for CenterPlace related to two limited term employees needed for interim staffing needs. 1 • $50,200 for additional computer and other hardware needs related to increases in City staffing • $85,000 increase for professional services related to the Law Enforcement Staffing Assessment. • $71,000 increase for improvements at the Precinct, including $16,000 in additional costs for fencing around the ancillary building at the old White Elephant, $30,000 in costs for furniture replacement in the roll call room, and $25,000 to replace the vehicle lift in the Precinct shop. • $209,975 increase for the costs of various studies, including $52,475 for the Tourism Study, $27,500 for the CenterPlace Study, $30,000 for the Annexation Study, and $100,000 for the Plante's Ferry Study. • $4,769 increase for the 20th Anniversary costs. This is not an increase in total costs, but rather is moving unspent budgeted amounts from 2022 to 2023. • $16,600 increase for new furniture in Engineering due to increases in staffing. • $6,000 increase for an equipment assessment at CenterPlace in order to determine overall conditions and estimate replacement timeframes. • $38,700 increase to move the costs for repainting the CenterPlace portico and replacement of carpet in CenterPlace to 2023. These items were budgeted in 2022 but were not completed. • $10,000 increase to purchase backup batteries for the emergency lighting system at CenterPlace. • $20,000 increase to repair sidewalks at CenterPlace. • $500,000 to replenish the Winter Weather Reserve Fund #122 back to a fund balance of $500,000. The Street O&M Fund was over budget on snow removal expenditures in 2022 by about $813,000. • $427,327 transfer to the Parks Capital Projects Fund #309 for the Balfour Park Phase 1 project as was authorized by Council at the January 24, 2023 council meeting. • $33,000 transfer to the Parks Capital Projects Fund #309 to replace the pump at Mirabeau Falls. • $5,358,054 transferred to Capital Reserve Fund #312 which represents the 2021 yearend fund balance in excess of 50% of recurring expenditures. • $6,520,000 increase due to expected CLFR related expenditures. #101 — Street O&M Fund Revenues reflect an increase of $6,490,028, including: • $1,700,000 increase of the budgeted solid waste road wear fee (previously budgeted in Fund #106) to reflect funding to implement the local access street program in 2023. • $1,862,929 transfer in from the Solid Waste Fund #106 to transfer the remaining restricted fund balance in Fund #106 from the road wear fee. • $2,677,099 transfer in from the Pavement Preservation Fund #311 to transfer the remaining restricted fund balance in Fund #311 from the road wear fee. • $250,000 transfer in from the Capital Reserve Fund #312 for the surface treatment pilot program. Expenditures increase by $4,247,840, including: • $32,575 increase in salaries, payroll taxes, and benefits costs across all Departments related to the 3% pay increase authorized by City Council at the December 20, 2022 council meeting. • $22,431 increase in salaries, payroll taxes, and benefit costs in the Street Fund related to adjusting employee allocations related to the new Stormwater staffing increases. • $116,602 increase to salaries, payroll taxes, and benefit costs for Streets related to two limited term employees needed for interim staffing needs. • $16,110 increase Street costs related the new Stormwater staffing increases. 2 • $1,530 increase for new desks at the Maintenance Shop (50% cost to Stormwater). • $8,500 increase for the remaining costs to install a generator at the Maintenance Shop (50% cost to Stormwater). • $4,050,092 increase to implement the local street program. The largest line -item costs included in this amount are $131,992 for salaries, payroll taxes, and benefits and $3,850,000 for contract street maintenance contracts. This program is paid for using the solid waste road wear fee. #104 — Hotel/Motel Tax — Tourism Facilities Fund Increase in revenues of $515,198 for transfers in from the Hotel/Motel Tax Fund #105. This increase reflects a Council motion on December 13, 2022, as part of the lodging tax grant process for the 2023 awards. Increase in expenditures of $2,000,000 for the lodging tax award to Spokane County for improvements to Avista Stadium. This was approved by Council motion on January 31, 2023. #105 — Hotel / Motel Tax Fund Net decrease of $46,100 in expenditures comprised of an increase in transfers out to the Hotel / Motel Tax — Tourism Facilities Fund #104 of $515,198 and a decrease of $561,298 in tourism promotion costs as was approved during the lodging tax process at the December 13, 2022 Council meeting. #106 — Solid Waste Fund Revenues decrease by $1,700,000 for the budgeted solid waste road wear fee (now budgeted in Fund #101) to reflect funding to implement the local access street program in 2023 in the Street O&M Fund #101. Net increase in expenditures of $162,929 consisting of an increase of $1,862,929 in transfers out to the Street O&M Fund #101 to transfer the remaining restricted fund balance in Fund #106 from the road wear fee, and a decrease of $1,700,000 in transfers out to the Pavement Preservation Fund #311 for that same road wear fee. #109 — Tourism Promotion Area Fund Revenues are increased by $800,000 to account for estimated Tourism Promotion Area fees within the City that were implemented as of January 1, 2023. Expenditures are proposed to increase by $45,000 for a professional services contract for the Spokane Valley TPA Destination Marketing Plan and Tourism Services Plan that was approved by Council at the May 2, 2023 meeting. #122 — Winter Weather Reserve Fund Revenues are increased by $500,000 reflecting a transfer in from the General Fund #001 to replenish the fund balance to $500,000. The Street O&M Fund was over budget on snow removal expenditures in 2022 by about $813,000, of which $500,000 was reimbursed to Fund #101 from Fund #122 during that year. #309 — Parks Capital Projects Fund Revenues and expenditures are proposed to increase by $1,654,465. This amount includes: • $1,621,465 for the Balfour Park Phase 1 construction costs. The expenditures are funded through $427,327 transfer in from the General Fund, $40,192 transfer in from the Civic Facilities Capital Projects Fund #310, and $1,153,946 transfer in from the Capital Reserve Fund #312. 3 • $33,000 for the pump replacement at Mirabeau Falls, which is funded by a transfer in from the General Fund. #310 — Civic Facilities Capital Proiects Fund Expenditures are increased by $839,285 for the City's contribution to the joint improvement costs of the new library being constructed adjacent to Balfour Park as outlined in the Memorandum of Understanding with the Library District. This consists of a payment of $799,093 to the Library District and a transfer to the Parks Capital Projects Fund #309. #311 — Pavement Preservation Fund Revenues decrease by $1,700,000 to eliminate the transfer of the solid waste road wear fee from the Solid Waste Fund #106 as this amount will now be accounted for in the Street O&M Fund #101 to fund the local access street program. Expenditures increase by a transfer out of $2,677,099 to the Street O&M Fund #101 to transfer the remaining restricted fund balance in Fund #311 from the road wear fee. #312 — Capital Reserve Fund Revenues are increased due to a transfer of $5,358,054 from General Fund #001 which represents the 2021 yearend fund balance in excess of 50% of recurring expenditures. Expenditures are increased by $2,954,546 which includes: • $791,000 for the purchase of 10303 E Sprague (Balfour Facility). • $759,600 for the amount still owing for the purchase of the WSDOT property adjacent to Sullivan Park. • $250,000 transfer to the Street O&M Fund #101 for a surface treatment pilot program. • $1,153,946 transfer to the Parks Capital Projects Fund #309 for the Balfour Park Improvements Phase 1. #402 — Stormwater Fund Revenues are increased by $3,649,000 to reflect the increase in the Stormwater fees to the proactive level of service. Expenditures increase by $1,135,586, which consists of: • $17,488 increase in salaries, payroll taxes, and benefits costs across all Departments related to the 3% pay increase authorized by City Council at the December 20, 2022 council meeting. • $304,488 increase in salaries, payroll taxes, and benefit costs in the Stormwater Fund related to adjusting employee allocations related to the new Stormwater staffing increases. • $543,580 increase costs related the new Stormwater staffing increases. The largest of these are $300,000 for private stormwater maintenance and $150,000 for capital projects. • $260,000 for the purchase of an easement from the Spokane Conservation District, which was approved by council at the January 10, 2023 council meeting. • $1,530 increase for new desks at the Maintenance Shop (50% cost to Street). • $8,500 increase for the remaining costs to install a generator at the Maintenance Shop (50% cost to Street). The 2023 Budget amendment reflects the changes noted above and will affect 12 funds resulting in total revenue increases of $20,175,745 and expenditure increases of $29,176,846. 4 Revenue Expenditure Fund Fund Increase Increase No. Name (Decrease) (Decrease) 001 General Fund 4,609,000 13,506,196 101 Street O&M Fund 6,490,028 4,247,840 104 Hotel/Motel Tax -Tourism Facilities Fund 515,198 2,000,000 105 Hotel/Motel Tax Fund 0 (46,100) 106 Solid Waste Fund (1,700,000) 162,929 109 Tourism Promotion Area Fund 800,000 45,000 122 Winter Weather Reserve Fund 500,000 0 309 Parks Capital Projects Fund 1,654,465 1,654,465 310 Civic Facilities Capital Projects Fund 0 839,285 311 Pavement Preservation Fund (1,700,000) 2,677,099 312 Capital Reserve Fund 5,358,054 2,954,546 402 Stormwater Fund 3,649,000 1,135,586 20,175, 745 29,176, 846 The 2023 Budget amendment also includes changes to the Employee Position Classification Monthly Salary Schedule to reflect the increases to the lower and upper ends of the salary ranges that were approved by Council at the December 20, 2022 council meeting as well as the addition of a new position related to the increased staffing in the Stormwater Fund. When Council authorized the increase of the Stormwater Fees to the proactive level of service, that increase also included an increase of seven additional FTEs in Engineering to accommodate the increased service level. Five of the seven new FTEs are included in the 2023 amendment figures. The remaining two of the seven previously authorized new FTEs are included in the 2024 Budget amounts that will be coming forward. OPTIONS: Options are to accept the proposed amendments in whole or in part. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to approve Ordinance #23-011 amending Ordinance #22-023 which adopted a budget for the period January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2023. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: This action amends the estimated revenues and appropriations for the 2023 Budget that was adopted on November 8, 2022. There are adequate funds available to pay for these amendments. STAFF CONTACT: Chelsie Taylor, Finance Director ATTACHMENTS: • Ordinance #23-011 • Fund level line -item detail of revenues and expenditures. • Fund summaries for all funds affected by the proposed budget amendment. • Proposed amended Employee Position Classification Monthly Salary Schedule. 5 DRAFT CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 23-011 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON, AMENDING ORDINANCE 22-023, WHICH ADOPTED A BUDGET FOR THE PERIOD JANUARY 1, 2023 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2023; AND OTHER MATTERS RELATED THERETO. WHEREAS, the City Council approved Ordinance 22-023 on November 8, 2022, which adopted the 2023 annual budget; and WHEREAS, subsequent to the November 8, 2022 adoption of the 2023 annual budget, it has become necessary to make changes by adding new revenue, appropriations, amendments, and transferring funds in order to properly perform City functions, services and activities; and WHEREAS, certain changes to employee positions have been made by the City Manager, which necessitate changes to the Employee Position Classification Monthly Salary Schedule that was included in the 2023 annual budget; and WHEREAS, certain changes were necessary to the salaries and wages for employees from what were included in the adopted 2023 annual budget; and WHEREAS, additional stormwater fees were authorized by Council in the fee resolution, and changes were necessary to reflect the new fee amounts and implement a proactive service level stormwater program; and WHEREAS, certain changes were necessary to implement a local access street program in the City's Street Fund; and WHEREAS, it is necessary to create Fund 109 Tourism Promotion Area Fund, which will be used to account for collections and expenditures of tourism promotion area fees imposed pursuant to RCW 35.101 and chapter 3.21 SVMC. All fees collected must be applied to tourism promotion within the City; and WHEREAS, certain funds should be eliminated because the underlying projects necessitating their use have been completed; and WHEREAS, the budget changes set forth in this Ordinance could not have been reasonably anticipated or known when the 2023 annual budget was passed by the City Council; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the best interests of the City are served by amending the 2023 budget to reflect unanticipated revenue, expenditures, transfers, and appropriating the same as set forth herein. NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley, Washington do ordain as follows: Section 1. Amended Revenues and Appropriations. Ordinance No. 22-023 adopted a budget for the twelve months beginning January 1, 2023 and ending December 31, 2023. Each item, revenue, appropriation, and fund contained in Section 1 of Ordinance 22-023 is hereby further amended as set forth in Attachment A to this Ordinance, which is incorporated herein. Section 2. Amended Employee Position Classification Monthly Salary Schedule. Ordinance No. 22-023 adopted an Employee Position Classification Monthly Salary Schedule as part of the budget for the Ordinance 23-011 amending the 2023 budget Page 1 of 4 twelve months beginning January 1, 2023 and ending December 31, 2023. The schedule is hereby amended as set forth in Attachment B to this Ordinance, which is incorporated herein. Section 3. Creating Fund 109. There is hereby created Fund 109 Tourism Promotion Area Fund which will be used to account for collections and expenditures tourism promotion area fees within the City. Section 4. Eliminating Fund 313. Fund 313 City Hall Construction Fund is hereby eliminated. Section 5. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance. Section 6. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect five days after publication of this Ordinance or a summary thereof in the official newspaper of the City as provided by law. Passed by the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley this 30th day of May 2023. ATTEST: Pam Haley, Mayor Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Approved as to form: Office of the City Attorney Date of Publication: Effective Date: Ordinance 23-011 amending the 2023 budget Page 2 of 4 ATTACHMENT A Source s Uses Fund No. Annual Appropriation Funds Be ginning Fund Balance Revenues Total Sources Appropriations Estimated Ending Fund Balance Adopted via Ord. 22-023 Amended via Ord. 23-011 Total Revenues Adopted via Ord. 22-023 Amended via Ord. 23-011 Total Appropriations 001 General 49,094,333 57,618,900 4,609,000 62,227,900 111,322,233 58,815,188 13,506,196 72,321,384 39,000,849 101 Street O&M 1,319,206 6,694,348 6,490,028 13,184,376 14,503,582 6,842,348 4,247,840 11,090,188 3,413,394 103 Paths & Trails 38,368 8,800 0 8,800 47,168 0 0 0 47,168 104 Hotel/Motel Tax - Tourism Facilities 5,619,705 605,000 515,198 1,120,198 6,739,903 0 2,000,000 2,000,000 4,739,903 105 Hotel/Motel Tax 507,419 901,000 0 901,000 1,408,419 901,000 (46,100) 854,900 553,519 106 Solid Waste 3,003,161 1,929,000 (1,700,000) 229,000 3,232,161 1,929,000 162,929 2,091,929 1,140,232 107 PEG 233,782 71,000 0 71,000 304,782 73,000 0 73,000 231,782 108 Affordable & Supportive Housing Sales Tax 577,569 200,000 0 200,000 777,569 0 0 0 777,569 109 Tourism Promotion Area 0 0 800,000 800,000 800,000 0 45,000 45,000 755,000 120 CenterPlace Operating Reserve 300,000 0 0 0 300,000 0 0 0 300,000 121 Service Level Stabilization 5,500,000 0 0 0 5,500,000 0 0 0 5,500,000 122 Winter Weather Reserve 31,780 1,100 500,000 501,100 532,880 500,000 0 500,000 32,880 204 Debt Service LTGO 03 0 1,089,550 0 1,089,550 1,089,550 1,089,550 0 1,089,550 0 301 Capital Projects 5,314,928 1,504,000 0 1,504,000 6,818,928 1,507,722 0 1,507,722 5,311,206 302 Special Capital Projects 6,791,175 1,506,000 0 1,506,000 8,297,175 1,855,820 0 1,855,820 6,441,355 303 Street Capital Projects 1,943,151 9,157,127 0 9,157,127 11,100,278 9,157,127 0 9,157,127 1,943,151 309 Parks Capital Projects 177,301 4,810,000 1,654,465 6,464,465 6,641,766 4,810,000 1,654,465 6,464,465 177,301 310 Civic Facilities Capital Projects 853,709 1,000 0 1,000 854,709 0 839,285 839,285 15,424 311 Pavement Preservation 6,615,700 6,546,800 (1,700,000) 4,846,800 11,462,500 7,855,121 2,677,099 10,532,220 930,280 312 Capital Reserve 13,671,557 20,000 5,358,054 5,378,054 19,049,611 6,268,292 2,954,546 9,222,838 9,826,773 314 Railroad Grade Separation Projects 267,460 3,697,644 0 3,697,644 3,965,104 3,950,000 0 3,950,000 15,104 315 Transportation Impact Fees 665,904 200,000 0 200,000 865,904 108,449 0 108,449 757,455 316 Economic Development Capital Projects 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 102,526,208 96,561,269 16,526,745 113,088,014 215,614,222 105,662,617 28,041,260 133,703,877 81,910,345 Sources Uses Revenues Appropriations Estimated Be ginning Ending Fund Working Adopted via Amended via Total Total Adopted via Amended via Total Working No. Working Capital Funds Capital Ord. 22-023 Ord. 23-011 Revenues Sources Ord. 22-023 Ord. 23-011 Appropriations Capital 402 Stormwater Management 2,278,363 1,953,000 3,649,000 5,602,000 7,880,363 2,510,684 1,135,586 3,646,270 4,234,093 403 Aquifer Protection Area 1,520,522 859,400 0 859,400 2,379,922 1,476,100 0 1,476,100 903,822 501 Equipment Rental & Replacement 1,417,119 421,600 0 421,600 1,838,719 523,000 0 523,000 1,315,719 502 Risk Management 428,022 600,000 0 600,000 1,028,022 600,000 0 600,000 428,022 632 Passthrough Fees & Taxes 947 591,000 0 591,000 591,947 591,000 0 591,000 947 5,644,973 4,425,000 3,649,000 8,074,000 13,718,973 5,700,784 1,135,586 6,836,370 6,882,603 Total of all Funds 108,171,181 100,986,269 20,175,745 121,162,014 229,333,195 111,363,401 29,176,846 140,540,247 88,792,948 Ordinance 23-011 amending the 2023 budget Page 3 of 4 ATTACHMENT B EMPLOYEE POSITION CLASSIFICATION MONTHLY SALARY SCHEDULE Effective January 1, 2023 Position Title Grade 2023 Range City Manager Unclassified Deputy City Manager 22 12,277.74 - 18,605.80 City Attorney 21 11,061.03 - 16,745.36 Finance Director 21 11,061.03 - 16,745.36 Community & Public Works Director 21 11,061.03 - 16,745.36 Parks, Recreation, and Facilities Director 20 9,954.80 - 15,071.93 City Engineer 20 9,954.80 - 15,071.93 Economic Development Director 20 9,954.80 - 15,071.93 Human Resources Director 20 9 954.80 - 15 071.93 Senior Deputy City Attorney 19 8,959.16 - 13,564.89 Building Official 19 8,959.16 - 13,564.89 Engineering Manager 19 8,959.16 - 13,564.89 Planning Manager 18 8,064.28 - 12,207.79 Senior Engineer 18 8,064.28 - 12,207.79 Public Works Superintendent 18 8,064.28 - 12,207.79 Accounting Manager 17 7,257.44 - 10,986.56 Assistant Building Official 17 7,257.44 - 10,986.56 Senior Administrative Analyst 17 7,257.44 - 10,986.56 IT Manager 17 7,257.44 - 10,986.56 Legislative Coordinator 17 7,257.44 - 10,986.56 Deputy City Attorney 16 6,531.03 - 9,887.27 City Clerk 16 6 531.03 - 9 887.27 Engineer 16 6 531.03 - 9 887.27 Senior Planner 16 6,531.03 - 9,887.27 Development Services Coordinator 16 6,531.03 - 9,887.27 Database Administrator 16 6,531.03 - 9,887.27 Accountant/Budget Analyst 16 6,531.03 - 9,887.27 Housing and Homeless Services Coordinator 16 6,531.03 - 9,887.27 Project Manager 16 6,531.03 - 9,887.27 CAD Manager 16 6,531.03 - 9,887.27 Code Enforcement Supervisor 16 6,531.03 - 9,887.27 Associate Planner 15 5,878.75 - 8,899.16 Assistant Engineer 15 5,878.75 - 8,899.16 IT Specialist 15 5,878.75 - 8,899.16 Engineering Technician II 15 5,878.75 - 8,899.16 Communications and Marketing Officer 15 5 878.75 - 8,899.16 Economic Development Project Specialist 15 5,878.75 - 8,899.16 Senior Plans Examiner 15 5,878.75 - 8,899.16 Public Information Officer 15 5,878.75 - 8,899.16 Administrative Analyst 15 5,878.75 - 8,899.16 Maintenance/Construction Foreman 15 5,878.75 - 8,899.16 GIS Analyst 15 5,878.75 - 8,899.16 CPW Liason 15 5,878.75 - 8,899.16 Signal Technician 15 5,878.75 - 8,899.16 Mechanic 14 5,291.19 - 8,009.86 Human Resource Analyst 14 5,291.19 - 8,009.86 CenterPlace Coordinator 14 5 291.19 - 8 009.86 Planner 14 5 291.19 - 8 009.86 Building Inspector II 14 5,291.19 - 8,009.86 Plans Examiner 14 5,291.19 - 8,009.86 Engineering Technician I 14 5,291.19 - 8,009.86 Senior Permit Specialist 14 5,291.19 - 8,009.86 Code Enforcement Officer 14 5,291.19 - 8,009.86 Maintenance/Construction Inspector 14 5,291.19 - 8,009.86 Recreation Coordinator 13 4,761.69 - 7,208.60 Deputy City Clerk 13 4,761.69 - 7,208.60 Customer Relations/Facilities Coordinator 13 4,761.69 - 7,208.60 Building Inspector I 13 4,761.69 - 7,208.60 Executive Assistant 13 4,761.69 - 7,208.60 Planning Technician 13 4 761.69 - 7 208.60 Human Resources Technician 13 4 761.69 - 7 208.60 Maintenance Lead 13 4,761.69 - 7,208.60 Senior Center Specialist 12 4,287.09 - 6,487.57 Permit Facilitator 12 4,287.09 - 6,487.57 Help Desk Technician 12 4,287.09 - 6,487.57 Accounting Technician 12 4,287.09 - 6,487.57 Administrative Assistant 12 4,287.09 - 6,487.57 Recreation Specialist 12 4,287.09 - 6,487.57 Paralegal 12 4,287.09 - 6,487.57 Maintenance Worker II 12 4,287.09 - 6,487.57 Maintenance Worker I 11 3,857.20 - 5,839.10 Permit Specialist 11 3 857.20 - 5 839.10 OfficeAssistantll 10-11 3471.24 - 5839.10 Custodian 10 3,471.24 - 5,253.96 Office Assistant I 9-10 3,124.51 - 5,253.96 Note: Slight rounding differences may exist between the figures reflected on this page and the actual payroll rates computed by the Eden Payroll System. Ordinance 23-011 amending the 2023 budget Page 4 of 4 P:1Finance\Budgets12023 Budget\BudgetAmendment\Amendment #1\2023 05 30 2nd Reading12023 Amendment No 1 Detail v2 for RCA CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA 2023 Budget - Amendment #1 Line Item Detail 5/30/2023 Account Description Account Number #001 - General Fund Recurring Expenditures Salaries and Wages - City Manager 001. 013.000.513.10.10.00 Payroll Taxes & Benefits - City Manager 001,013,000.513,10.20.00 Salaries and Wages - City Attorney 001.013.015.515.32.10.00 Payroll Taxes & Benefits - City Attorney 001.013.015.515.32.20.00 Salaries and Wages - Public Safety 001.016.016.521.50.10.00 Payroll Taxes & Benefits - Public Safety 001.016.016.521.50.20.00 Salaries and Wages - DCM 001.018.013.513.10.10.00 Payroll Taxes & Benefits - DCM 001.018.013.513.10.20.00 Salaries and Wages - Finance 001.018.014.514.23.10.00 Payroll Taxes & Benefits - Finance 001.018.014.514.23.20.00 Salaries and Wages - HR 001.018.016.518.10.10.00 Payroll Taxes & Benefits - HR 001.018.016.518.10.20.00 Office & Operating Supplies - HR 001.018.016.518.10.31.01 Employee Health & Wellness Supplies - 1001.018.016.518.10.35.13 Advertising - HR 001.018.016.518.10.41.17 Registrations - HR 001.018.016.518.10.49.04 Salaries and Wages - IT 001.018.017.518.80.10.00 Payroll Taxes & Benefits - IT 001.018.017.518.80.20.00 Salaries and Wages - Facilities 001.033.000.518.30.10.00 Payroll Taxes & Benefits - Facilities 001.033,000.518.30.20.00 Salaries and Wages - CPW Admin 001.040.000.518.90.10.00 Payroll Taxes & Benefits - CPW Admin 001.040.000.518.90.20.00 Salaries and Wages - Engineering 001.040.041.543.10.10.00 Payroll Taxes & Benefits - Engineering 001.040.041.543.10.20.00 Safety Equipment- Engineering Fuel - Engineering Small Tools & Equip - Engineering Cell Phones - Engineering Equipment Repair & Maintenance - Eng Software Licenses - Engineering 001.040.041.543.10.31.06 001.040.041.543.10.32.01 001.040.041.543.10.35.01 001.040.041.543.10.42.03 001.040.041.543.10.48.01 001.040.041.543,10.48.03 Description 1 Justification Initial Budget Amendment Amended Budget - Adjust for 3% payroll increase, true up new employee amounts, move PI0 from Econ Dev - Adjust for 3% payroll increase, true up new employee amounts, move PIO from Econ Dev - Adjust for 3% payroll increase - Adjust for 3% payroll increase - Adjust for 3% payroll increase - Adjust for 3% payroll increase - Adjust for 3% payroll increase - Adjust for 3% payroll increase - Adjust for 3% payroll increase - Adjust for 3% payroll increase - Adjust for 3% payroll increase - Adjust for 3% payroll increase - Materials for job fairs - Employee recognition supplies - City Attorney recruitment - Job fair registrations - Adjust for 3% payroll increase - Adjust for 3% payroll increase - Adjust for 3% payroll increase - Adjust for 3% payroll increase - Adjust for 3% payroll increase - Adjust for 3% payroll increase - Adjust for 3% payroll increase, adjust Eng FTE allocations for new SW staffing - Adjust for 3% payroll increase, adjust Eng FTE allocations for new SW staffing - Adjust Eng for new SW staffing - Adjust Eng for new SW staffing - Adjust Eng for new SW staffing - Adjust Eng for new SW staffing - Adjust Eng for new SW staffing - Adjust Eng for new SW staffing 605,188 144,820 750,008 281,702 48,694 330,396 536,853 16,119 552,972 222,770 2,677 225,447 23,799 712 24,511 14,044 134 14,178 400,755 12,025 412,780 136,762 1,910 138,672 912,696 27,398 940,094 380,144 4,817 384,961 233,091 7,004 240,095 89,377 1,002 90,379 500 1,000 1,500 700 800 1,500 4,000 21,000 25,000 650 500 1,150 295,392 9,228 304,620 116,916 1,736 118,652 175,304 5,245 180,549 78,394 987 79,381 235,368 7,068 242,436 73,158 1,006 74,164 827,512 (63,039) 764,473 341,779 (28,161) 313,618 500 400 900 5,000 500 5,500 2,500 1,600 4,100 6,920 1,010 7,930 2,000 500 2,500 24,150 4,800 28,950 Page 1 of 9 P:1FinancelBudgets12023 Budget\Budget Amendment\Amendment #1\2023 05 30 2nd Reading12023 Amendment No 1 Detail v2 for RCA CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA 2023 Budget - Amendment #1 Line Item Detail 5/30/2023 Account Description Account Number #001 - General Fund - continued Recurring Expenditures - continued Memberships/Professional Licenses - En Registrations - Engineering Salaries and Wages - Engineering Payroll Taxes & Benefits - Engineering Salaries and Wages - Econ Dev Payroll Taxes & Benefits - Econ Dev Professional Services - Econ Dev Salaries and Wages - HHS Payroll Taxes & Benefits - HHS Salaries and Wages - Code Enf. Payroll Taxes & Benefits - Code Enf. Salaries and Wages - Building Payroll Taxes & Benefits - Building Salaries and Wages - Planning Payroll Taxes & Benefits - Planning Salaries and Wages - P&R Admin Payroll Taxes & Benefits - P&R Admin Salaries and Wages - Recreation Payroll Taxes & Benefits - Recreation Salaries and Wages - Senior Center Payroll Taxes & Benefits - Senior Center Salaries and Wages - CenterPlace Payroll Taxes & Benefits - CenterPlace Desktop Hardware - Non Capital 001.040.041.543.10.49.02 001.040.041.543.10.49.04 001.040.041.558.50.10.00 001.040.041.558.50.20.00 001.040.042.558.70.10.00 001.040.042.558.70.20.00 001.040.042.558.70.41.05 001.040.042.565.40.10.00 001.040.042.565.40.20.00 OD1.040.043.524.60.10.00 001.040.043.524.60.20.00 D01.040.043.558.50.10.00 001.040.043.558.50.20.00 D01.040.044.558.60.10.00 001.040.044.558.60.20.00 001.076.000.576.80.10.00 001.076.000.576.80.20.00 001.076.301.571.10.10.00 001.076.301.571.10.20.00 001.076.304.575.50.10.00 001.076.304.575.50.20.00 001.076.305.575.50.10.00 001.076.305.575.50.20.00 001.090.000, 518,85.35.11 Description 1 Justification Initial Budget Amendment Amended Budget - Adjust Eng for new SW staffing - Adjust Eng for new SW staffing - Adjust for 3% payroll increase, adjust Eng FTE allocations for new SW staffing - Adjust for 3% payroll increase, adjust Eng FTE allocations for new SW staffing - Adjust for 3% payroll increase, move PIO to CM - Adjust for 3% payroll increase, move PIO to CM - Additional videos for State of the City - Adjust for 3% payroll increase - Adjust for 3% payroll increase - Adjust for 3% payroll increase - Adjust for 3% payroll increase - Adjust for 3% payroll increase - Adjust for 3% payroll increase - Adjust for 3% payroll increase - Adjust for 3% payroll increase - Adjust for 3% payroll increase - Adjust for 3% payroll increase - Adjust for 3% payroll increase - Adjust for 3% payroll increase - Adjust for 3% payroll increase - Adjust for 3% payroll increase - Adjust for 3% payroll increase, add limited term employees - Adjust for 3% payroll increase, add limited term employees - Additional computer and hardware due to increased staffing Total recurring expenditures 2,245 250 2,495 7,500 500 8,000 575,640 (83,915) 491,725 234,755 (46,732) 188,023 557,659 (86,133) 471,526 237,436 (46,056) 191,380 60,000 9,000 69,000 93,600 2,808 96,408 33,335 528 33,863 153,204 4,584 157,788 61,868 862 62,730 994,528 30,318 1,024,846 428,782 5,703 434,485 490,164 15,852 506,016 199,185 2,983 202,168 207,268 6,205 213,473 79,947 1,167 81,114 97,306 2,935 100,241 54,729 552 55,281 22,550 677 23,227 8,787 127 8,914 281,460 78,031 359,491 160,524 21,833 182,357 15,500 50,200 65,700 205,771 Page 2of9 P:1FinancelBudgets12023 Budget\Budget AmendmentAAmendment #112023 05 30 2nd Reading12023 Amendment No 1 Detail v2 for RCA CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA 2023 Budget - Amendment #1 Line item Detail 5/30/2023 Account Description Account Number #001 - General Fund - continued Nonrecurring Revenues Precinct grant Spokane County Grant Proceeds 001.016.099.xxx.xx.xx 001.040.099.xxx.xx.xx 001.090.331.330.21.01 Nonrecurring Expenditures Law Enforcement Prof Services Precinct Improvements Precinct Furniture Precinct Heavy Duty Equipment Professional Services - Econ Dev 001.040.099.558.70.41.05 Professional Services - 20th Anniversary 001.040.099.573.90.41.05 Office Furniture & Equipment CenterPlace Prof Services CenterPlace Improvements CenterPlace Improvements CenterPlace Sidewalk Transfer out - #122 Transfer out - #309 Transfer out- #309 Transfer out - #312 CLFR Program Expenditures 001.016.099.521.10.41.10 001.016.099.521.21.48.01 001.016.099.594.21.64.01 001.016.099.594.21.64.05 001.040.099.594.XX.64.01 001.076.099.575.50.41.05 001.076.099.575.50.48.01 001.076.099.575.50.48.01 001.076, 099.594.50.62.01 D01.090.099.597.12, 00,20 001.090.099.597.30.00.90 001.090.099.597.30.00.90 001.090.099.597.31.00.20 001.090.331.514.60.xx.xx Description I Justification Initial Budget Amendment Amended Budget - Grant proceeds for furniture & equipment at the precinct - County portion of Planters Ferry Study - Estimated CLFR revenues for 2023 Total nonrecurring revenues - Add costs for Law Enf. Staffing Assessment - Fencing for Ancillary Building - Furniture for roll call room at Precinct - Precinct shop lift replacement - Add costs for various studies/consultants - Move forward costs for the 20th Anniversary not expended in 2022 - Furniture for additional Engineering staff - Equipment Assessment - Move CenterPlace portico painting and carpet replacement from 2022 - Backup batteries for CenterPlace emergency lighting - Sidewalk repairs at CenterPlace - Replenish winter weather reserve - Balfour Park Imp. Phase 1 - Pump replacement for Mirabeau Falls - 2021 #001 fund bal > 50% - Estimated CLFR related expenditures for 2023 Total nonrecurring expenditures 0 39000 0 50,000 0 4,520,000 0 15,000 0 0 0 30,000 0 0 0 4,509,000 85,000 16,000 30,000 25,000 209,975 4,769 16,600 6,000 38,700 0 10,000 0 20,000 0 500,000 0 427,327 0 33,000 0 5,358,054 0 6,520,000 13,300,425 Total of all General Fund revenues Total of all General Fund expenditures 4,609,000 13, 506,196 39,000 50,000 4,520,000 85,000 31,000 30,000 25,00D 209,975 34,769 16,600 6,000 38,700 10,000 20,000 500,000 427,327 33,000 5,358,054 6,520, 000 Page 3 of 9 P:1Finance\Budgets12023 Budget\Budget AmendmentWmendment #112023 05 30 2nd Reading12023 Amendment No 1 Detail v2 for RCA CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA 2023 Budget - Amendment #1 Line Item Detail 5/30/2023 Account Description Account Number #101 - Street Fund Revenues Solid Waste Road Wear Fee Transfers in - #106 Transfers in - #311 Transfers in -#312 Expenditures Salaries and Wages - Snow Payroll Taxes & Benefits - Snow Salaries and Wages - Street Maint. Payroll Taxes & Benefits - Street Maint. Limited Term Salaries and Wages Limited Term Payroll Taxes & Benefits Safety Equipment - Traffic Vehicle Maint Supplies - Traffic Fuel - Traffic Cell Phones - Traffic Travel/Mileage - Traffic Equipment Rental - Traffic Equip Repair & Maintenance - Traffic Software Licenses - Traffic Small Tools & Minor Equip - Traffic Memberships/Prof Licenses - Traffic Registrations - Traffic Furniture & Equipment - Traffic Heavy Duty Machinery & Equip 101.044.000.344.10.01 101.044.099.397.10.10 101.044.099.397.31.10 101.044.099.397.31.20 101.000.000.542.66.10.00 101.000.000.542.66.20.00 101.042.000.542.10.10.00 101.042.000.542.10.20.00 101.042.000.542.10.10.00 101.042.000.542.10.20.00 101.042.000.542.10.31.06 101.042.000.542.10.31.10 101.042.0 00.542.10 , 32.01 101.042.000.542.10.42.03 101.042.000.542.10.43.01 101.042.000.542.10.45.03 101.042.000.542.10.48.01 101. 042. 000.542.10.48.03 101.042.000.542,64.35.01 101.042.000.542.90.49.02 101.042.000.542.90.49.04 101.042.099.594.42.64.01 101.042.099.594.44.64.05 Description /Justification Initial Budget Amendment Amended Budget - Move road wear fee from Fund #106 to implement the local access street program - Transfer remaining road wear fee amounts from fund balance from Fund #106 Transfer remaining road wear fee amounts from fund balance from Fund #311 Transfer amount for surface treatment pilot program Total revenues - Adjust for 3% payroll increase, adjust Eng FTE allocations for new SW staffing - Adjust for 3% payroll increase, adjust Eng FTE allocations for new SW staffing - Adjust for 3% payroll increase, adjust Eng FTE allocations for new SW staffing - Adjust for 3% payroll increase, adjust Eng FTE allocations for new SW staffing - Add 2 limited term employees - Add 2 limited term employees - Adjust Eng for new SW staffing - Adjust Eng for new SW staffing - Adjust Eng for new SW staffing - Adjust Eng for new SW staffing - Adjust Eng for new SW staffing - Adjust Eng for new SW staffing - Adjust Eng for new SW staffing - Adjust Eng for new SW staffing - Adjust Eng for new SW staffing - Adjust Eng for new SW staffing - Adjust Eng for new SW staffing - Desks for Maintenance Shop (50% Storm) - Remainder of cost for Maintenance Shop Generator (50% Storm) 0 1,700,000 1,700,000 0 1,862,929 1,862,929 0 2,677,099 2,677,099 0 250,000 250,000 6,490,028 147,795 18,637 166,432 64,559 10,517 75,076 679,519 13,328 692,847 296,825 4,111 300,936 0 72,360 72,360 0 44,242 44,242 1,000 200 1,200 10,000 2,500 12,500 15,000 3,000 18,000 6,460 1,010 7,470 7,800 1,000 8,800 12,300 5,000 17,300 3,040 500 3,500 20,536 600 21,136 55,000 800 55,800 72,227 1,000 73,227 3,500 500 4,000 0 1,530 1,530 0 8,500 8,500 Page 4of9 P:1FinancelBudgets12023 Budget\Budget Amendment\Amendment #112023 05 30 2nd Reading12023 Amendment No 1 Detail v2 for RCA CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA 2023 Budget - Amendment #1 Line Item Detail 5/30/2023 Account Description Account. Number #101 - Street Fund - continued Expenditures - continued Salaries and Wages - Bridge Maint. 101. 043.000.542.10.10.00 Payroll Taxes & Benefits - Bridge Maint. 101.043.000.542.10,20.00 Salaries and Wages - Local Streets 101.044.000.542.10.10.00 Payroll Taxes & Benefits - Local Streets 101.044.000.542.10.20.00 Safety Equipment - Local Streets 101.044.000.542.10.31.06 Repair & Maint Supplies - Local Streets 101.044.000.542.10.31.08 Small Tools & Minor Equip - Local Street 101.044.000.542.10.35.01 Engineering & Architect - Local Streets 101.044.000.542.10.41.02 Contract St Maint - Local Streets 101.044.000.542.10.41.10 Advertising - Local Streets 101.044.000.542.10.41.17 Cell Phones - Local Streets 101.044.000,542,10.42.03 Travel/Mileage - Local Streets 101.044.000.542.10.43.01 Equipment Rental - Local Streets 101.044.000.542.30.45.03 Software Licenses - Local Streets 101.044.000.542.10.48.03 Registrations - Local Streets 101.044.000.542.10.49.04 Printing & Binding - Local Streets 101.044.000.542.10.49.03 Description / Justification Initial Budget Amendment Amended Budget #104 - Hotel/Motel Tax -Tourism Facilities Fund Revenues Transfers in - #105 - Adjust for 3% payroll increase, adjust Eng FTE allocations for new SW staffing - Adjust for 3% payroll increase, adjust Eng FTE allocations for new SW staffing - Implement local streets program - Implement Local streets program - implement local streets program - Implement local streets program - Implement local streets program - Implement local streets program - Implement local streets program - lmplement local streets program - lmplement local streets program - Implement local streets program - Implement local streets program - lmplement local streets program - Implement local streets program - Implement local streets program Total expenditures 104.000.000.397.10.50 - Transfer based on Council action in 2022 Total revenues Expenditures Spokane Cnty - Avista Stadium Award 104.000.000.557.30.41.00 - Based on Council action 25,008 6,053 31,061 10,811 2,360 13,171 0 93,118 93,118 0 38,874 38,874 0 300 300 0 1,000 1,000 0 2,000 2,000 0 50,000 50,000 0 3,850,000 3,850,000 0 2,500 2,500 0 300 300 0 1,500 1,500 0 500 500 0 9,000 9,000 0 500 500 0 500 500 4,247,840 0 515,198 515,198 515,198 0 2,000,000 2,000,000 Total expenditures 2,000,000 Page 5 of 9 P:1FinancelBudgets12023 Budget\Budget AmendmentlAmendment #1\2023 05 30 2nd Reading12023 Amendment No 1 Detail v2 for RCA CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA 2023 Budget - Amendment #1 Line Item Detail 5/30/2023 Account Description Account Number Description / Justification Initial Budget Amendment Amended Budget #105 - Hotel/Motel Tax Fund Expenditures Tourism Promotion Transfers out - #104 105.105.000.557.30.41.00 - Decrease for based on actual Council awards 105,105.000.597.10.00.40 - Transfer based on Council action in 2022 #106 - Solid Waste Fund Revenues Solid Waste Road Wear Fee Expenditures Transfers out - #101 Transfers out - #311 Total expenditures 871,000 (561,298) 309,702 0 515,198 515,198 (46,100) - Move road wear fee to Fund #101 to implement 106.000.400.344.10.01 the local access street program 1,700,000 (1,700,000) 0 Total revenues (1,700,000) - Transfer remaining road wear fee amounts from 106.000.000.597.10.00.10 fund balance to Fund #101 0 1,862,929 1,862,929 106.000.000.597.31.00.10 - Elminate road wear transfer to Fund #311 1,700,000 (1,700,000) 0 #109 -Tourism Promotion Fund Revenues Tourism Promotion Area Fee Expenditures Professional Services Total expenditures 162,929 109.000.000.345.60.00 - Estimated TPA fees for 2023 109.000.000. #122 - Winter Weather Reserve. Fund Revenues Transfer in -#001 0 800,000 800,000 Total revenues 800,000 - Expenditures for five-year marketing plan 0 45,000 45,000 Total expenditures. 45,000 122.122.000.397.00.10 - Replenish Winter Weather Reserve 0 500,000 500,000 Total revenues 500,000 Page 6 of 9 P_1FinancelBudgets12023 BudgettBudget Amendment'Amendment #112023 05 30 2nd Reading12023 Amendment No 1 Detail v2 for RCA CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA 2023 Budget - Amendment #1 Line Item Detail 5/30/2023 Account Description Account Number Description / Justification Initial Budget Amendment Amended Budget #309 - Parks Capital Projects Fund Revenues Transfer in - #001 Transfer in - #001 Transfer in - #310 Transfer in - #312 Expenditures Balfour Park Mirabeau Falls 309.000.316.397.00.10 309.000.xxx.397.00.10 309.000.316.397.31.00 309.000.316.397.31.20 - Balfour Park Imp. Phase 1 - Pump replacement for Mirabeau Falls - Balfour Park joint improvements - Balfour Park Imp. Phase 1 Total revenues 309.000.316.594.76.63.00 - 2023 Construction Costs 309.000.xxx.594.76.63.00 - Pump replacement for Mirabeau Falls #310 - Civic Facilities Capital Projects Fund Expenditures Payment to Library District Transfer out - #309 Total expenditures 310.000.000.576.90.41.05 - Payment to the Library District for joint improvement costs per MOLD 310.000.000.597.30.00.90 - Balfour Park joint improvements #311 - Pavement Preservation Fund Revenues Transfer in - #106 Expenditures Transfer out - #101 311.000.0 00.397.10.60 Total expenditures - Elminate road wear transfer to Fund #311 Total revenues 0 427,327 0 33,000 0 40,192 3,400,000 1,153,946 1,654,465 427,327 33,000 40,192 4,553,946 3,400,000 1,621,465 5,021,465 0 33,000 1,654,465 33,000 0 799,093 799,093 0 40,192 40,192 839,285 1,700,000 (1,700,000) 5,358,054 (1,700,000) 311.000.000.597.10.00.10 - Transfer remaining road wear fee amounts from fund balance to Fund #101 0 2,677,099 2,677,099 Total expenditures 2,677,099 Page 7 of 9 P:1Finance\Budgets12023 Budget\Budget Amendment\Amendment #112023 05 30 2nd Reading12023 Amendment No 1 Detail v2 for RCA CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA 2023 Budget - Amendment #1 Line Item Detail 5/30/2023 Account Description Account Number Description / Justification Initial Budget Amendment Amended Budget #312 - Capital Reserve Fund Revenues Transfer in - #001 Expenditures Property acquisition Property acquisition Transfer out - #101 Transfer out - #309 312.000.000.397.00.10 - 2021 #001 fund bal > 50% 312.0 00.000.594.18.61.00 312.0 00.000.594.76.61.00 312.000.000.597.10.00.10 312.000.0 00.597.30.00.90 #402 - Stormwater Fund Revenues Stormwater Mgmt Fees Expenditures Salaries and Wages Payroll Taxes & Benefits Safety Equipment Repair & Maintenance Supplies Vehicle Maintenance Supplies Fuel Small Tools & Minor Equipment Private Stormwater Maintenance Advertising Cell Phones Travel/Mileage Equipment Repair & Maintenance Software Licenses & Maintenance Memberships/Professional Licenses 402.402.000.343.13.00 402.402.000.531.36.10.00 402.402.000.531.36.20.00 402.402.000.531.36.31.06 402.402.000.531.36.31.08 402.402.000.531.36.31.10 402.402.000.531.36.32.01 402.402.000.531.36.35.01 402.402.000.531.36.41.10 402.402.000.531.36.41.17 402.402.000.531.36.42.03 402.402.000.5 31.36.43.01 402.402.000.531.36.48.01 402.402.000.531.36.48.03 402.402.000.531.36.49.02 Total revenues - Purchase of 10303 E Sprague - WSDOT Sullivan Park Property Acquisition - Transfer amount for surface treatment pilot program - Balfour Park imp. Phase 1 Total expenditures 0 5,358,054 5,358,054 5,358054 0 791,000 791,000 0 759,600 759,600 0 250,000 250,000 4,523,900 1,153,946 5,677,846 2,954,546 - Update Stormwater Fees for revenue increase 1,951,000 3,649,000 5,600,000 Total revenues - Adjust for 3% payroll increase, adjust Eng FTE allocations for new SW staffing - Adjust for 3% payroll increase, adjust Eng FTE allocations for new SW staffing - Adjust for proactive SW program - Purchase of new storm lids/grates - Adjust for proactive SW program - Adjust for proactive SW program - Adjust for proactive SW program - Adjust for proactive SW program - Adjust for proactive SW program - Adjust for proactive SW program - Adjust for proactive SW program - Adjust for proactive SW program - Adjust for proactive SW program - Adjust for proactive SW program 3,649,000 447,402 219,536 666,938 187,990 102,440 290,430 300 400 700 2,000 75,000 77,000 3,500 500 4,000 7,500 1,000 8,500 5,000 1,600 6,600 1,268,668 300,000 1,568,668 1,000 1,000 2,000 2,260 3,030 5,290 2,000 1,000 3,000 7,500 500 8,000 2,556 7,800 10,356 1,699 250 1,949 Page 8 of 9 P:1FinancelBudgets12023 BudgettBudget Amendment\Amendment #112023 05 30 2nd Reading12023 Amendment No 1 Detail v2 for RCA CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA 2023 Budget - Amendment #1 Line Item Detail 5/30/2023 Account Description Account Number #402 - Stormwater Fund - continued Expenditures - continued Registrations Land Acquisition Heavy Duty Machinery & Equipment Furniture & Equipment Construction/Capital Outlay 402.402.000.531.36.49.04 402.000.099.594.31.61.00 402.000.099.594.31.64.05 402.402.099.594.38.34.01 402.000.099.595.40.63.00 Description 1 Justification Initial Budget Amendment Amended Budget - Adjust for proactive SW program - Spokane Conservation District Easement - Remainder of cost for Maintenance Shop Generator (50% Street) - Desks for Maintenance Shop (50% Street) - Adjust for proactive SW program Total expenditures Totals Across all Funds 2,625 1,500 4,125 0 260,000 260,000 0 8,500 8,500 0 1,530 1,530 200,000 150,000 350,000 1,135,586 Total revenues Total expenditures 20,175,745 29,176,846 Page 9 of 9 P:\Finance\Budgets\2023 Budget\Budget Amendment\Amendment #1\2023 05 30 2nd Reading\2023 Budget Summary for Amended Funds No 1 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA 2023 Budget Amendment #001 - GENERAL FUND RECURRING ACTIVITY Revenues Property Tax Sales Tax Sales Tax - Public Safety Sales Tax - Criminal Justice Gambling Tax and Leasehold Excise Tax Franchise Fees/Business Registration State Shared Revenues Fines and Forfeitures/Public Safety Community and Public Works Recreation Program Revenues Grant Proceeds Miscellaneous Department Revenue Miscellaneous & Investment Interest Transfers in - #105 (h/m tax-CP advertising) 2023 As Adopted Proposed Amendment As Amended 13,569,200 0 13,569,200 30,555,000 0 30,555,000 1,357,000 0 1,357,000 2,398,000 0 2,398,000 383,000 0 383,000 1,215,000 0 1,215,000 2,341,000 0 2,341,000 518,600 0 518,600 3,145,900 0 3,145,900 625,500 0 625,500 120,000 0 120,000 2,500 0 2,500 158,200 0 158,200 30,000 0 30,000 Total Recurring Revenues 56,418,900 0 56,418,900 Expenditures City Council 707,558 0 707,558 City Manager 965,890 193,514 1,159,404 City Attorney 903,110 18,796 921,906 Public Safety 32,771,515 846 32,772,361 Deputy City Manager 590,817 13,935 604,752 Finance 1,313,840 32,215 1,346,055 Human Resources 354,278 31,306 385,584 Information Technology 425,208 10,964 436,172 Facilities 469,652 6,232 475,884 Community & Public Works -Administration 367,126 8,074 375,200 Community & Public Works - Engineering 2,305,213 (212,287) 2,092,926 Community & Public Works - Building 2,075,542 41,467 2,117,009 Community & Public Works - Planning 868,894 18,835 887,729 Economic Development 1,546,494 (119,853) 1,426,641 Parks & Rec - Administration 376,124 7,372 383,496 Parks & Rec - Maintenance 972,455 0 972,455 Parks & Rec - Recreation 348,356 3,487 351,843 Parks & Rec - Aquatics 565,700 0 565,700 Parks & Rec - Senior Center 38,112 804 38,916 Parks & Rec - CenterPlace 996,503 99,864 1,096,367 General Government 1,895,218 50,200 1,945,418 Transfers out - #204 (2016 LTGO debt service) 401,150 0 401,150 Transfers out - #309 (park capital projects) 160,000 0 160,000 Transfers out - #311 (pavement preservation) 1,011,800 0 1,011,800 Transfers out - #502 (insurance premium) 600,000 0 600,000 Total Recurring Expenditures 53,030,555 205,771 53,236,326 Recurring Revenues Over (Under) Recurring Expenditures 3,388,345 (205,771) 3,182,574 5/30/2023 Page 1 of 8 P:\Finance\Budgets\2023 Budget\Budget Amendment\Amendment I11\2023 05 30 2nd Reading\2023 Budget Summary for Amended Funds No 1 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA 2023 Budget Amendment 2023 As Adopted Proposed Amendment As Amended #001 - GENERAL FUND - continued NONRECURRING ACTIVITY Revenues Grant Proceeds (CLFR) 0 4,520,000 4,520,000 Precinct Grant Proceeds 0 39,000 39,000 Spokane County (Plante's Ferry Study) 0 50,000 50,000 Transfers in - #312 (police vehicle replacements) 1,200,000 0 1,200,000 Total Nonrecurring Revenues Expenditures General Government - IT capital replacements 151,000 0 151,000 City Attorney (office furniture for new Paralegal) 8,500 0 8,500 Public Safety (police vehicle replacements) 1,350,085 0 1,350,085 Public Safety (Access/fencing White Elephant) 15,000 16,000 31,000 Public Safety (Install Precinct gutters) 4,000 0 4,000 Public Safety (Install security cameras at Precinct) 20,000 0 20,000 Public Safety (Law Enf. Staffing Assessment) 0 85,000 85,000 Public Safety (furniture for roll call room) 0 30,000 30,000 Public Safety (shop lift replacement) 0 25,000 25,000 Engineering (furniture for additional staff) 0 16,600 16,600 Econ Dev (20th Anniversary event planner) 30,000 4,769 34,769 Econ Dev (Various studies - Tourism, etc) 0 209,975 209,975 Parks & Rec (replace CenterPlace flooring) 26,000 0 26,000 Parks & Rec (CenterPlace lobby improvements) 150,000 0 150,000 Parks & Rec (Portico painting & carpet replacemt) 0 38,700 38,700 Parks & Rec (CenterPlace equip assessment) 0 6,000 6,000 Parks & Rec (CP emergency light backup batteries) 0 10,000 10,000 Parks & Rec (CenterPlace sidewalk repairs) 0 20,000 20,000 Financial Software Capital Costs 500,000 0 500,000 City Hall Repairs 0 0 0 CLFR Project Expenditures 0 6,520,000 6,520,000 Transfers out - #101 (Street Fund operations) 3,530,048 0 3,530,048 Transfers out - #122 (replenish reserve) 0 500,000 500,000 Transfers out - #309 (Balfour Park Imp Phi) 0 427,327 427,327 Transfers out - #309 (Pump replace Mirabeau Falls) 0 33,000 33,000 Transfers out - #312 ('21 fund bal >50%) 0 5,358,054 5,358,054 1,200,000 4,609,000 5,809,000 Total Nonrecurring Expenditures 5,784,633 13,300,425 19,085,058 Nonrecurring Revenues Over (Under) Nonrecurring Expenditures Excess (Deficit) of Total Revenues Over (Under) Total Expenditures Beginning unrestricted fund balance Ending unrestricted fund balance Fund balance as a percent of recurring expenditures (4,584,633) (8,691,425) (13,276,058) (1,196,288) (8,897,196) (10,093,484) 49,094,333 47,898,045 90.32% 49,094,333 39,000,849 73.26 5/30/2023 Page 2 of 8 P:\Finance\Budgets\2023 Budget\Budget Amendment\Amendment #1.\2023 05 30 2nd Reading\2023 Budget Summary for Amended Funds No 1 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA 2023 Budget Amendment SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS #101 - STREET FUND RECURRING ACTIVITY Revenues Utility Tax Motor Vehicle Fuel (Gas) Tax Multimodal Transportation Revenue Right -of -Way Maintenance Fee Solid Waste Road Wear Fee (local streets) Investment Interest Miscellaneous Total Recurring Revenues Expenditures 2023 As Adopted Proposed Amendment As Amended 857,000 0 857,000 2,062,600 0 2,062,600 139,200 0 139,200 95,000 0 95,000 0 1,700,000 1,700,000 500 0 500 10,000 0 10,000 3,164,300 1,700,000 4,864,300 Wages / Benefits / Payroll Taxes 1,314,394 186,998 1,501,392 Limited Term Wages/Benefits/Payroll Taxes 0 116,602 116,602 Supplies 191,500 5,700 197,200 Services & Charges 2,803,789 10,410 2,814,199 Snow Operations 1,081,915 0 1,081,915 Local Street Program 0 3,918,100 3,918,100 Intergovernmental Payments 1,000,000 0 1,000,000 Vehicle rentals - #501 (non -plow vehicle rental) 27,750 0 27,750 Vehicle rentals - #501 (plow replace.) 275,000 0 275,000 Total Recurring Expenditures 6,694,348 4,237,810 10,932,158 Recurring Revenues Over (Under) Recurring Expenditures (3,530,048) (2,537,810) (6,067,858) NONRECURRING ACTIVITY Revenues Transfers in - #001 3,530,048 0 3,530,048 Transfers in - #106 (local streets) 0 1,862,929 1,862,929 Transfers in - #311 (local streets) 0 2,677,099 2,677,099 Transfers in - #312 (surface treatment pilot) 0 250,000 250,000 Total Nonrecurring Revenues 3,530,048 4,790,028 8,320,076 Expenditures Streetlight Replacement Program 40,000 0 40,000 Generator for Maintenance Shop (1/2 cost to #402) 0 8,500 8,500 Desks for Maintenance Shop (1/2 cost to #402) 0 1,530 1,530 Bridge Replacement Program 10,000 0 10,000 Signal Maintenance Equipment 40,000 0 40,000 Transfers out - #501 (truck for Signal Technician) 58,000 0 58,000 Total Nonrecurring Expenditures 148,000 10,030 158,030 Nonrecurring Revenues Over (Under) Nonrecurring Expenditures 3,382,048 4,779,998 8,162,046 Excess (Deficit) of Total Revenues Over (Under) Total Expenditures (148,000) 2,242,188 2,094,188 Beginning fund balance 1,319,206 1,319,206 Less restricted fund balance 0 (2,571,928) Unrestricted ending fund balance 1,171,206 841,466 5/30/2023 Page 3 of 8 P:\Finance\Budgets\2023 Budget\Budget Amendment\Amendment #1\2023 05 30 2nd Reading\2023 Budget Summary for Amended Funds No I CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA 2023 Budget Amendment 2023 As Adopted Proposed Amendment As Amended SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS - continued #104 - HOTEL / MOTEL TAX - TOURISM FACILITIES FUND Revenues Hotel/Motel Tax 600,000 0 600,000 Investment Interest 5,000 0 5,000 Transfers in - #105 0 515,198 515,198 Total revenues Expenditures Spokane Cnty - Avista Stadium Award Total expenditures 605,000 515,198 1,120,198 0 2,000,000 2,000,000 0 2,000,000 2,000,000 Revenues over (under) expenditures 605,000 (879,802) Beginning fund balance 5,619,705 5,619,705 Ending fund balance 6,224,705 4,739,903 #105 - HOTEL 1 MOTEL TAX FUND Revenues Hotel/Motel Tax Investment Interest 900,000 1,000 0 900,000 0 1,000 Total revenues 901,000 0 901,000 Expenditures Transfers out - #001 30,000 0 30,000 Transfers out - #104 0 515,198 515,198 Tourism Promotion 871,000 (561,298) 309,702 Total expenditures 901,000 (46,100) 854,900 Revenues over (under) expenditures 0 46,100 Beginning fund balance 507,419 507,419 Ending fund balance 507,419 553,519 #106 - SOLID WASTE FUND Revenues Solid Waste Administrative Fee 225,000 0 225,000 Solid Waste Road Wear Fee 1,700,000 (1,700,000) 0 Investment Interest 4,000 0 4,000 Total revenues 1,929,000 (1,700,000) 229,000 Expenditures Education/Contract Admin 229,000 0 229,000 Transfers out - #101 0 1,862,929 1,862,929 Transfers out - #311 1,700,000 (1,700,000) 0 Total expenditures 1,929,000 162,929 2,091,929 Revenues over (under) expenditures 0 (1,862,929) Beginning fund balance 3,003,161 3,003,161 Ending fund balance 3,003,161 1,140,232 5/30/2023 Page 4 of 8 P:\Finance\Budgets\2023 Budget\Budget Amendment\Amendment #1\2023 05 30 2nd Reading\2023 Budget Summary for Amended Funds No 1 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA 2023 Budget Amendment SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS - continued #109 - TOURISM PROMOTION AREA FUND Revenues Tourism Promotion Area Fee Total revenues Expenditures Services & Charges Total expenditures 2023 As Adopted Proposed Amendment As Amended 0 800,000 800,000 0 800,000 800,000 0 45,000 45,000 0 45,000 45,000 Revenues over (under) expenditures 0 Beginning fund balance 0 Ending fund balance 0 755,000 0 755,000 #122 - WINTER WEATHER RESERVE FUND Revenues Investment Interest 1,100 0 1,100 Transfers in - #001 0 500,000 500,000 Total revenues Expenditures Street maintenance expenditures Transfers out - #101 Total expenditures Revenues over (under) expenditures Beginning fund balance Ending fund balance CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS 1,100 500,000 501,100 500,000 0 0 500,000 0 0 500,000 0 500,000 (498,900) 31,780 1,100 31,780 (467,120) 32,880 #309 - PARKS CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND Revenues Grant Proceeds 126,100 0 126,100 Transfers in - #001 160,000 460,327 620,327 Transfers in - #310 0 40,192 40,192 Transfers in -#312 4,523,900 1,153,946 5,677,846 Total revenues 4,810,000 1,654,465 6,464,465 Expenditures 316 Balfour Park improvements Phase 1 3,400,000 1,621,465 5,021,465 328 Sullivan Park water line 500,000 0 500,000 338 Spokane Valley River Loop Trail 750,000 0 750,000 Replace pump at Mirabeau Falls 0 33,000 33,000 Parking & Trail Design (Srrmmerfleld, Ponderosa, Flora) 136,900 0 136,900 West Lawn Shade Canopy for Stage 23,100 0 23,100 Total expenditures 4,810,000 1,654,465 6,464,465 Revenues over (under) expenditures 0 0 Beginning fund balance 177,301 177,301 Ending fund balance 177,301 177,301 5/30/2023 Page 5 of 8 P:\Finance\Budgets\2023 Budget\Budget Amendment\Amendment #1\2023 05 30 2nd Reading\2023 Budget Summary for Amended Funds No 1 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA 2023 Budget Amendment CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS - continued #310 - CIVIC FACILITIES CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND Revenues Investment Interest Total revenues Expenditures Payment to Library District Transfer out - #309 (Balfour Park) Total expenditures 2023 As Adopted Proposed Amendment As Amended 1,000 0 1,000 1,000 0 1,000 0 799,093 799,093 0 40,192 40,192 0 839,285 839,285 Revenues over (under) expenditures 1,000 (838,285) Beginning fund balance 853,709 853,709 Ending fund balance 854,709 15,424 #311 - PAVEMENT PRESERVATION FUND Revenues Transfers in - #001 1,011,800 0 1,011,800 Transfers in -#106 1,700,000 (1,700,000) 0 Transfers in - #301 1,037,500 0 1,037,500 Transfers in -#302 1,037,500 0 1,037,500 Grant Proceeds 1,760,000 0 1,760,000 Total revenues 6,546,800 (1,700,000) 4,846,800 Expenditures Pavement preservation 7,805,121 0 7,805,121 Pre -project GeoTech 50,000 0 50,000 Transfer out - #101 (local streets) 0 2,677,099 2,677,099 Total expenditures 7,855,121 2,677,099 10,532,220 Revenues over (under) expenditures (1,308,321) (5,685,420) Beginning fund balance 6,615,700 6,615,700 Ending fund balance 5,307,379 930,280 5/30/2023 Page 6of8 P:\Finance\Budgets\2023 Budget\Budget Amendment\Amendment #1\2023 05 30 2nd Reading\2023 Budget Summary for Amended Funds No 1 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA 2023 Budget Amendment CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS - continued #312 - CAPITAL RESERVE FUND Revenues Transfers in - #001 ('21 fund bat >50%) Investment Interest Total revenues 2023 As Adopted Proposed Amendment As Amended 0 5,358,054 5,358,054 20,000 0 20,000 20,000 5,358,054 5,378,054 Expenditures Transfers out - #001 (police vehicle replacements) 1,200,000 0 1,200,000 Transfers out - #101 (surface treatment pilot) 0 250,000 250,000 Transfers out - #309 (Balfour Park improvements Ph. 1) 3,400,000 1,153,946 4,553,946 Transfers out - #309 (Sullivan Park water line) 373,900 0 373,900 Transfers out - #309 (Spokane Valley River Loop Trail) 750,000 0 750,000 Transfers out #314 (Barker Rd Overpass) 347,998 0 347,998 Transfers out - #314 (Pines Rd Underpass) 196,394 0 196,394 10303 E Sprague Property Acquisition 0 791,000 791,000 WSDOT Sullivan Park Property Acquisition 0 759,600 759,600 Total expenditures 6,268,292 2,954,546 9,222,838 Revenues over (under) expenditures (6,248,292) (3,844,784) Beginning fund balance 13,671,557 13,671,557 Ending fund balance 7,423,265 9,826,773 5/30/2023 Page 7 of 8 P:\Finance\Budgets\2023 Budget\Budget Amendment\Amendment #1\2023 05 30 2nd Reading\2023 Budget Summary for Amended Funds No 1 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA 2023 Budget Amendment ENTERPRISE FUNDS #402 - STORMWATER FUND [RECURRING ACTIVITY Revenues Stormwater Management Fees Investment Interest Total Recurring Revenues Expenditures Wages / Benefits / Payroll Taxes Supplies Services & Charges Intergovernmental Payments Vehicle rentals - #501 Total Recurring Expenditures Recurring Revenues Over (Under) Recurring Expenditures NONRECURRING ACTIVITY 2023 As Adopted Proposed Amendment As Amended 1,951,000 3,649,000 5,600,000 2,000 0 2,000 1,953,000 3,649,000 5,602,000 635,392 321,976 957,368 20,800 78,500 99,300 1,449,742 315,080 1,764,822 48,000 0 48,000 6,750 0 6,750 2,160,684 715,556 2,876,240 (207,684) 2,933,444 2,725,760 Revenues Grant Proceeds 0 0 0 Total Nonrecurring Revenues 0 0 0 Expenditures Capital - various projects 200,000 150,000 350,000 Watershed studies 100,000 0 100,000 Stormwater comprehensive plan update 50,000 0 50,000 Generator for Maintenance Shop (1/2 cost to #101) 0 8,500 8,500 Desks for Maintenance Shop (1/2 cost to #101) 0 1,530 1,530 Land Acquisition for Easement 0 260,000 260,000 Total Nonrecurring Expenditures 350,000 420,030 770,030 Nonrecurring Revenues Over (Under) Nonrecurring Expenditures Excess (Deficit) of Total Revenues Over (Under) Total Expenditures Beginning working capital Ending working capital (350,000) (420,030) (770,030) (557,684) 2,513,414 2,278,363 1,955,730 2,278,363 1,720,679 4,234,093 5/30/2023 Page 8 of 8 Appendix A EMPLOYEE POSITION CLASSIFICATION MONTHLY SALARY SCHEDULE Effective January 1, 2023 Position Title Gracie 2023 Range City Manager Unclassified Deputy City Manager 22 12,277.74 - 18,605.80 City Attorney 21 11,061.03 - 16,745.36 Finance Director 21 11,061.03 - 16,745.36 Community & Public Works Director 21 11,061.03 - 16,745.36 Parks, Recreation, and Facilities Director 20 9,954.80 - 15,071.93 City Engineer 20 9,954.80 - 15,071,93 Economic Devetopmenl Director 20 9,954.80 - 15,071.93 Human Resources Director 20 9,954.80 - 15,071.93 Senior Deputy City Attorney 19 8,959.16 - 13,564.89 Building Official 19 8,959,16 - 13,564.89 Engineering Manager 19 8,959.16 - 13,564.89 Planning Manager 18 8,064.28 - 12,207.79 Senior Engineer 18 8,064.28 - 12,207.79 Public Works Superintendent 18 8,064.28 - 12,207.79 Accounting Manager 17 7,257.44 - 10,986.56 Assistant Building Official 17 7,257.44 - 10,986.56 Senior Administrative Analyst 17 7,257.44 - 10,986.56 IT Manager 17 7,257.44 - 10,986.56 Legislative Coordinator 17 7,257.44 - 10,986.56 Deputy City Attorney 16 6,531.03 - 9,087.27 City Clerk 16 6,531.03 - 0,887.27 Engineer 16 6,531.03 - 9,887.27 Senior Planner 16 6,531.03 - 9,88727 Development Services Coordinator 16 6,531.03 - 9,887.27 Database Administrator 16 6,531.03 - 9,887.27 Accountant/Budget Analyst 16 6,531.03 - 9,887.27 Housing and Homeless Services Coordinator 16 6,531.03 - 9,887.27 Project Manager 16 6,531.03 - 9,887.27 CAD Manager 16 6,531.03 - 9,887,27 Code Enforcement Supervisor 16 6,531.03 - 9,887.27 Associate Planner 15 5,878.75 - 8,899.16 Assistant Engineer 15 5,878.75 - 8,899.16 IT Specialist 15 5,878,75 - 8,899.16 Engnieering Technician II 15 5,878.75 - 8,899.16 Communications and Marketing Officer 15 5,878.75 - 8,899.16 Economic Development Project Specialist 15 5,878.75 - 8,899.16 Senior Plans Examiner 15 5,878.75 - 8,899.16 Public Information Officer 15 5,878.75 - 8,899.16 Administrative Analyst 15 5,878.75 - 8,899.16 Maintenance/Construction Foreman 15 5,878.75 - 8,899.16 GIS Analyst 15 5,878.75 - 8,899.16 CPW Liason 15 5,878.75 - 8,899,16 Signal Technician 15 5,878.75 - 8,899.16 Mechanic 14 5,291.19 - 8,009.86 Human Resource Analyst 14 5,291.19 - 8,009.86 CenterPlace Coordinator 14 5,291,19 - 8,009.86 Planner 14 5,291.19 - 8,009.96 Building Inspector II 14 5,291.19 - 8,009.96 Plans Examiner 14 5,291.19 - 8,009.86 Engineering Technician I. 14 5,291.19 - 8,009.86 Senior Permil Specialist 14 5,291.19 - 8,009.86 Code Enforcement Officer 14 5,291.19 - 8,009.86 Maintenance/Construction Inspector 14 5,291.19 - 6,009.86 Recreation Coordinator 13 4,761.39 - 7,208.60 Deputy City Clerk 13 4.761.69 - 7,206.63 Customer Relations/Facilities Coordinator 13 4,751.69 - 7,208.63 Building Inspector I 13 4,761.69 - 7,206.69 Executive Assistant 13 4,761.69 - 7,208.63 Planning Technician 13 4,761.69 - 7,208.60 Human Resources Technician 13 4,761,69 - 7,268,60 Maintenance Lead 13 4,761.69 - 7,208.60 Senior Center Specialist 12 4,287.09 - 6,487.57 Permit Facilitator 12 4,287.09 - 6,487.57 Help Desk Technician 12 4,287.09 - 6,487.57 Accounting Technician 12 4,287,09 - 6,487,57 Administrative Assistant 12 4,287.09 - 6,487.57 Recreation Specialist 12 4,287.09 - 6,487.57 Paralegal 12 4,287.09 - 6,467.57 Maintenance Worker II 12 4,287.09 - 6,457.57 Maintenance Worker I 11 3,857,20 - 5,639.10 Permit Specialist 11 3,857.20 - 5,839.10 Office Assistant II 10-11 3,471.24 - 5,639.10 Custodian 10 3,471.24 - 5,253.96 Office Assistant I 9-10 3,124.51 - 5,253.96 Note: Slight rounding differences may exist between the figures reflected on this page and the actual payroll rates computed by the Eden Payroll System. Salary Schedule 3% CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: May 30, 2023 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent n old business ® new business n public hearing ❑ information n admin. report n pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: First Reading Ordinance 23-012 — STV-2023-0001, Oaks Academy Street Vacation. GOVERNING LEGISLATION: Chapter 22.140 Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC); chapter 35.79 Revised Code of Washington (RCW), and RCW 35A.47.020. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: On April 4, 2023, City Council adopted Resolution 23-005 to set the public hearing date before the Planning Commission. On May 23, 2023, Council agreed by consensus to have Ordinance 23-012 presented for first reading. BACKGROUND: The Oaks Education Association requests the vacation of approximately 6,900 square feet of public right-of-way. The right-of-way to be vacated comprises the fourth leg of the intersection of 22nd Avenue and Glenview Circle. The right-of-way is unimproved and does not connect to another right-of-way. The right-of-way was dedicated in 1968 as part of the plat for Glenview Acres 3rd Addition. The right-of-way to be vacated is surrounded on three sides by property owned by the applicant, Oaks Education Association. The Planning Commission conducted a study session on April 13, 2023, and held a public hearing on April 27, 2023. Following the public hearing, the Planning Commission deliberated on the proposed street vacation and voted 6-0 to forward to City Council a recommendation to approve STV-2023-0001. An Administrative Report was presented to City Council on May 23, 2023. The Council agreed by consensus to have the proposed Ordinance presented for first reading providing. The draft Ordinance under consideration identifies findings for the proposed street vacation are consistent with the SVMC. Note that City Council adopted amendments to its Governance Manual that provide that Council will not take public comment on items that have already had a public hearing, such as the street vacation presented in proposed Ordinance 23-012. Division of Vacated Right -of -Way to Abutting Property Owners: There are two parcels, both owned by Oaks Education Association, adjacent to the right-of-way to be vacated. The draft ordinance specifies that the vacated portion of the street shall belong to the abutting property owners. The vacated property shall be transferred one-half to each of the abutting parcels. Compensation for Right -of -Way: Pursuant to SVMC 22.140.040 the City Council reserves the right to require compensation as a condition of approval of the street vacation, and any required compensation shall be paid to the City prior to the City's participation in required title transfer actions. Resolution 22-020 supplies guidance for computing the compensation for street vacations. The table below presents the analysis conducted consistent with Resolution 22-020 to find the appraised value of the vacated property. RCA First Ordinance Reading for STV-2022-0003 Page 1 of 2 Parcel Number Appraised Market Value 2023 1 Lot Size in S uare Feet Appraised Value per S uare Foot 45281.2104 45281.2802 $90,000 $891,880 Average value per square feet Approx. square feet of public right of way Appraised value for area of street vacation 50% of appraised value 14,375 356,751 $6.26 $2.50 $4.38 6,900 6,900 sf x $4.38 = $30,225.02 $30,225.02 x 50% = $15,112.51 Cost to purchase right of way = $15,112.51 'Value of land only established by the Spokane County Assessor Pursuant to Resolution 22-020, the cost for the applicant to purchase the vacated right of way would be approximately $15,112.51. The exact cost of purchase shall be determined by the final square footage of the area to be vacated according to the record of survey. OPTIONS: Move to advance Ordinance 23-012 to a second reading with or without further amendments. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Move to advance to a second reading Ordinance 23-012. STAFF CONTACT: Levi Basinger, Planner ATTACHMENTS: 1. Draft Ordinance 23-012 2. Signed Planning Commission Findings and Recommendations 3. Approved Planning Commission Meeting Minutes: a. April 13, 2023 b. April 27, 2023 (unsigned) 4. Draft Planning Commission Meeting Minutes (May 11, 2023) 5. Staff Report and Recommendation to the Planning Commission RCA First Ordinance Reading for STV-2022-0003 Page 2 of 2 DRAFT CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 23-012 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY WASHINGTON, PROVIDING FOR A VACATION OF APPROXIMATELY 6,900 SQUARE FEET OF PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY SOUTH OF THE INTERSECTION OF 22ND AVENUE AND GLENVIEW CIRCLE, AND PROVIDING FOR OTHER MATTERS PROPERLY RELATING THERETO. WHEREAS, on April 4, 2023 the City Council approved Resolution 23-005 to set the public hearing date for the Planning Commission to consider vacation of 6,900 square feet of public right-of-way south of the intersection of 22"d Avenue and Glenview Circle; and WHEREAS, on April 27, 2023, the Planning Commission held a public hearing; and WHEREAS, following the hearing, the Planning Commission found that the notice and hearing requirements of Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) 22.140.020 had been met; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission findings and minutes have been filed with the City Clerk as part of the public record supporting the vacation; and WHEREAS, written objections to the proposed vacation from the general public have been filed with concerns that allowing the property owner to use the vacated right-of-way for access would create more traffic locally; and WHEREAS, Pursuant to SVMC 22.140.040 and Resolution 22-020, the adjacent property owner shall provide compensation to the City for the public right-of-way to be vacated; and WHEREAS, pursuant to chapter 22.140 SVMC, upon vacation of the road, the City shall transfer the vacated property to the abutting property owner of parcel numbers 45281.2104 and 45281.2802, the zoning district designation of the property adjoining the right-of-way shall attach to the vacated property, a record of survey shall be submitted to the City, and all direct and indirect costs of title transfer to the vacated right-of-way shall be paid by the proponent or recipient of the transferred property; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to vacate the right-of-way south of the intersection of 22nd Avenue and Glenview Circle pursuant to chapter 22.140 SVMC. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley, Spokane County, Washington, do ordain as follows: Section 1. Findings of Fact. The City Council makes the following findings of fact: 1. The area proposed to be vacated is surrounded on three sides by private property owned by the same owner. Although it is unimproved, the City is obligated to maintain and prohibit encroachments into the right-of-way. The adjacent property owner desires to take ownership and maintenance of the area and improve it as part of their private property. The City's Senior Traffic Engineer supports the vacation with driveway access as proposed on the site plan approved with the Trip Generation and Distribution Letter. The proposed driveway would be located to the west of the proposed vacation, and the area to be vacated would have curbing installed. The vacation of this right-of-way will better serve the public by reducing maintenance obligations of the City, eliminating a potential safety hazard at an existing street intersection, and allowing full development of the adjacent private property. 2. The area proposed to be vacated is currently unimproved and is not being used for public access. The street is no longer required for public use or access and is not required for current or future public access or use. Additionally, development immediately to the south precludes the extension of the public street in its current alignment. 3. There is no substitution being proposed as part of the vacation. The City's review has Ordinance 23-012 — Vacating public right-of-way south of 22"d Avenue and Glenview Circle Page 1 of 4 DRAFT determined there is no need for a new or different public way. The right-of-way was originally dedicated in 1968 as part of the plat for Glenview Acres 3rd Addition as the fourth leg of the intersection between 22nd Avenue and Glenview Circle. The south leg of the intersection, and the large tracts of land south of 22nd Avenue have remained largely undeveloped. As a result, the intersection between 22nd and Glenview has functioned as a three-way intersection since its initial construction. No additional right-of-way is needed to substitute the subject right-of-way to be vacated. 4. Development immediately to the south precludes a future extension of the public street. No changes would occur in the future that would require the use of the subject right-of-way for public access. 5. Notice of the public hearing was made by posting written notice at City Hall, CenterPlace, and the Valley library; publishing notice in the Spokane Valley Herald; and posting at the right-of-way to be vacated. A direct mailing was sent to property owners adjacent to the proposed vacation, which in this case included the applicant because their property surrounds the right-of-way on three sides. Public objections to the proposed vacation were received prior to and during the public hearing, with concerns that allowing the property owner to use the vacated right-of-way for access would create more traffic locally. In response to public testimony, during deliberations the Planning Commission made a recommendation to extend the sidewalk being installed by the applicant as part of the Oaks Academy construction project to the east across the vacated portion of right-of-way consistent with the extension of the curb, which is also required as a condition of approval. 6. Resolution 22-020 was adopted pursuant to RCW 35.79.030 to set the City's policy for imposing vacation charges. Pursuant to Section 1 of Resolution 22-020: a. The cost for property received as a result of a vacation initiated by an adjacent property owner shall equal 50% of the appraised value of the vacated property if the subject property being vacated was initially acquired by the City through dedication. i. The appraised value of the property being vacated shall be the same as the assessed value of an equivalent portion of the property adjacent to the proposed vacation as established by the Spokane County Assessor at the time the matter is considered by the City Council. ii. If the value of the adjacent properties differs, then the average of the adjacent property values per square foot shall be used. Based on the average assessed value of the adjacent property and the approximate square footage of the right-of-way to be vacated, $15,112.51 is 50% of the assessed value and would be the cost to purchase the right-of-way to be vacated. The exact cost the applicant shall pay the City to purchase the right-of-way shall be determined by the actual square footage of the right-of-way to be vacated according to a record of survey provided by the applicant. Section 2. Property to be Vacated. Based upon the above findings, the City Council does hereby vacate the street or alley which is incorporated herein by reference, and legally described as follows: The unnamed street located between and adjacent to Lot 4, Block 5 and Lot 1, Block 6 Glenview Acres 3rd Addition, recorded in Book 9 of Plats, page 15, records of Spokane County, Washington in the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 28, Township 25 North, Range 44 East, Willamette Meridian. Situate in the City of Spokane Valley, County of Spokane, State of Washington. Section 3. Division of Property to be Vacated. Pursuant to RCW 35.79.040 and SVMC 22.140.040(C), the vacated portion of the public right-of-way shall belong to the abutting property owners, one-half to each, unless factual circumstances otherwise dictate a different division and distribution of the street or alley to be vacated. There are two adjacent parcels, and the property in Ordinance 23-012 — Vacating public right-of-way south of 22"d Avenue and Glenview Circle Page 2 of 4 DRAFT question will become part of parcel numbers 45281.2104 and 45281.2802. Both parcels are owned by the Oaks Education Association. The completion of the vacation shall be recorded in the record of survey which shall be created and recorded with Spokane County as required pursuant to SVMC 22.140.090. Section 4. Zoning. The zoning designation for the vacated property shall be the designation attached to the adjoining property as set forth within the respective property or lot lines. The City Manager, or designee, is authorized to make this notation on the official Zoning Map of the City. Section 5. Conditions of Vacation. The following conditions shall be fully satisfied prior to the transfer of title by the City. 1. Initial work to satisfy the conditions of the street vacation (File No. STV-2023-0001), including all conditions below, shall be submitted to the City for review within 90 days following the effective date of approval by the City. 2. The vacated property shall be transferred one half to each owner of the abutting parcels, parcel numbers 45281.2802 and 45281.2104, as shown on the record of survey created and recorded with Spokane County Auditor's Office pursuant to Condition 3 below. Such property shall become part of each abutting parcel. 3. Following the City Council's passage of the ordinance approving the street vacation, a record of survey of the area to be vacated, prepared by a registered surveyor in the State of Washington, including an exact metes and bounds legal description, and specifying any and all applicable easements for construction, repair and maintenance of existing and future utilities and services, shall be completed. 4. The adjacent property owners shall purchase from the City the public right-of-way to be vacated consistent with Resolution 22-020. The exact cost of purchase shall be determined by the final square footage of the area to be vacated according to the record of survey. 5. An easement acceptable to Lumen and Modern Electric Water Company for access and maintenance of existing utilities within the area to be vacated shall be established. The location and recording number shall be shown on the record of survey. 6. Prior to recording the record of survey, the existing curb returns at Glenview Circle shall be removed and Type 'A' curb and sidewalk shall be installed along 22nd Avenue across the vacated portion of Glenview Circle, per Spokane Valley Street Standards (SVSS). The applicant shall meet the following requirements during and after construction: a. Construction within the public right-of-way shall be performed under the direct supervision of a licensed Washington State Professional Engineer and in accordance with the Spokane Valley Street Standards. All work is subject to inspection by the City of Spokane Valley Development Engineering Construction Inspector. b. Upon completion of the improvements, a Construction Certification package per SVSS Chapter 9 shall be submitted and approved prior to recording of the Street Vacation Ordinance. c. A Warranty Surety shall be provided for the public improvements per SVSS Chapter 9. 7. The existing driveway approach for 11706 E. 22nd Avenue shall be extended to the required Type 'A' curb and sidewalk installed per SVSS, prior to recording the record of survey. Ordinance 23-012 — Vacating public right-of-way south of 22"d Avenue and Glenview Circle Page 3 of 4 DRAFT 8. Any unpaved area located north of the required Type 'A' curb within the proposed vacated area shall be paved per SVSS, prior to recording the record of survey. 9. All direct and indirect costs of the title transfer of the vacated right-of-way from public to private ownership, including but not limited to, title company charges, copying fees, and recording fees, shall be paid by the proponent. The City shall not, and does not, assume any financial responsibility for any direct or indirect costs for the transfer of title. 10. The zoning district designation of R-2, which applies to the properties adjoining the street to be vacated, shall be automatically extended over the entirety of the vacation, and all area included in the vacation shall then and henceforth be subject to all regulations of the district. The adopting Ordinance shall specify this zoning district extension inclusive of the applicable zoning district designations. 11. The record of survey and certified copy of the Ordinance shall be recorded by the City Clerk in the office of the Spokane County Auditor. 12. All recording fees shall be paid by the proponent prior to recording. 13. All conditions of City Council authorization shall be fully satisfied prior to any transfer of title by the City. Section 6. Closing. Following satisfaction of the above conditions, the City Clerk shall record a certified copy of this Ordinance in the office of the County Auditor, and the City Manager is authorized to execute and finalize all necessary documents to complete the transfer of the property identified herein. Section 7. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance shall be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance. Section 8. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect five days after publication of this Ordinance or a summary thereof in the official newspaper of the City of Spokane Valley as provided by law. PASSED by the City Council this day of , 2023. ATTEST: Pam Haley, Mayor Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Approved As To Form: Office of the City Attorney Date of Publication: Effective Date: Ordinance 23-012 — Vacating public right-of-way south of 22"d Avenue and Glenview Circle Page 4 of 4 FINDINGS ANI) RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE SPOKANE VALLEY PLANNING COMMISSION Pursuant to Spokane Valley Municipal Code tSVMC) 17.80.150(n the Planning Commission shall consider the proposal and shall prepare and forward a recommendation to the City Council following the public hearing. The Following findings are consistent with the Planning Commission's decision to recommend approval of File No. STV-20 23-0001. A. Background: I. Chapter 22.140 SVMC, governing street vacations. 2. STV-2023-0001 is a privately initiated street vacation request l0 vacate 6,900 square feet of public right-of-way south of the intersection of 22"d Avenue and Glenview Circle. 3. The Planning Commission held a properly noticed public bearing on April 27, 2023. 4. On April 27. 2023, the Planning Commission conducted deliberations and voted unanimously to recommend approval of STV-2023-0001 to the City Council. B. Planning Commission Findings: Compliance with SVMC 22.140.030 I. Whether a change of use or vacation of the street or alley will better serve the public. The area proposed to be vacated is stirrorinded on three sides by private property owned by the same owner. Although it is unimproved, the City is obligated to maintain and prohibit encroachrnents into the right -of --way. The adjacent property owner desires to take ownership and maintenance of the area and improve it as part of their private property. The City's Senior Traffic Engineer supports the vacation with driveway access as proposed on the site plan approved with the Trip Generation and Distribution Letter, vt lrich is to the west of the proposed vacation. Traffic does not support the use of the area proposed to be vacated as access to school development and a condition to curb the right-of-way has been included. The vacation of this right-of-way will better serve the public by reducing maintenance obligations of the City. eliminating a potential safety hazard at an existing street intersection, and allowing full development of the adjacent private property. 2. Whether the street or alley is no longer required for public use or public access. The area proposed to be vacated is currently taniirrprovccl and is not being used for public access. The street is no longer required foy public use or access and is not required for current or future public access or use. Additionally. development immediately to the south precludes the extension of the public street in Its current alignment. 3. Whether the substitution of a new and different public way would be more useful to the public. There is no substitution being proposed as part of the vacation. The City's review has determined there is no need for a new or different public way. The right of way was originally dedicated as part of the plat for Glenview Acres 3rd Addition in 1968 as the fourth leg of the intersection between 22nd Avenue and Glenview Circle. The south leg of the intersection, and the large tracts of land south of 22nd Avenue have remained largely undeveloped. As a result, the intersection between 22nd and Glenview has functioned as Findings and liecommcnklations or the Spokane Valley Planning Commission STV-2023.000I Page I of4 a three -rutty intersection since its initial construction. No additional right of way is needed to substitute the subject right away to be vacated. 4. W'Vhether• conditions may so change in the future as to provide a greater use or need than presently exists. Development immediately to the south precludes a future extension attic public street. No changes would occur in the future that would require the use of the subject right-of-way fbr public access. 5. 'Whether objections to the proposed vacation are made by owners of private property (exclusive of Iietitioner•s) abutting the street or alley or other governmental agencies Or members of the general public. No objections by the utility providers or governmental agencies have been received. One public objection was received prior to the public hearing, with concerns that allowing the property owner to use the vacated right of rvay for access would create more Ira Mc locally. Similar concerns r'egardinf.'. lddith iutl access to the Oaks Academy private school site from 22nd Avenue were voiced by concerned members of the public at the public hearing. According to public tcstinrt>ny, large numbers of students use 22"`1 Avenue to walk to and from the nearby public schools of lorvdish Middle School and South Pines Elementary School. As part oldie Oaks Academy development, a sidewalk is being constructed on the southside of22iil Avenue from 13uwvdish to the eastern edge of the proposed vacated right- of-way. An existing condition ofapproval included extending the curb across the proposed vacation. During deliberations the Planning Commission made, in response to public testimony, a recommendation to extend the sidewalk being installed by the applicant as part of the Oaks Academy construction project to the east across the vacated portion of right of way consistent with the extension of the curb. C. Conclusions: The findings confirm that the criteria set forth in SVMC 22.140.030 have been islet. D. Recommendation: The Spokane Valley Planning Commission therefore recommends the City Council approve STV-2023-O001 subject to the following conditions: 1. Initial work to satisfy the conditions of the street vacation (File No. STV-2023-0001), including all conditions below, shall be submitted to the City fbr review within 90 days following the effective date of approval by the City. 2. The vacated property shall be lrsntsfcrred one half to each owner oI the abutting parcels, parcel numbers 45281.2802 and 45281.2 ! t14, as shown on the record of survey created and recorded with Spokane County Auditor's Office pursuant to Condition 3 below. Such property shall become part ()leach abutting parcel. 3. Following the City Council's passage of the ordinance appr•ovingY the street vacation, a record of survey of the area to be vacated, prepared by a registered survc or in talc• State of Washington. including art exact metes and bounds legal description, and specifying any and all applicable easements for construction, repair and maintenance of existing and future utilities and services. shall be completed. 4. The adjacent property owners shall purchase from the City the public right of way to be vacated Findings and Recommendations or the Spokane Valley Planning Commission STV-2023-000 I Page 2 or4 consistent with Resolution 22-020. The exact cost of purchase shall be determined by the final square footage of the area to be vacated according to the record of survey. 5. An easement acceptable to lumen and Modern Electric Water Company for access and maintenance of existing Utilities Gvitliiir the arca to be vacated shall be established. The location and recording number shall he shown on the record or survey. 6. The existing curb returns at Glenview Circle shall be removed and .Type 'A' curb and sidewalk shall be installed along 22"d Avenue across the vacated portion of Glenview Circle per Spokane Valley Street Standards (SVSS) prior to recording the record of survey. The applicant shall meet the following requirements during and after construction: a. Construction within the public right-of-way shall be perliu'it)ed under the direct supervision of licensed Washington State Professional Engineer and in accordance with the Spokane Valley Street Standards. All work is subject to inspection by the City of Spokane Valley Development Engineering Construction Inspector. b. Upon completion of the improvements, a Construction Certification package per SVSS Chapter 9 shall be submitted and approved prior to recording of the Street Vacation Ordinance. c. Al Warranty Surety shall be provided for the public improvements per SVSS Chapter I li existini. driveway approach for 1 1706 E. 22"`r Avenue shall be extended to the required Type 'A' curb and sidewalk installed per SVSS prior to recording the record of survey. 8. Any unpaved area located north of the required Type 'A' curb within the proposed vacated area shall be paved per SVSS prior to recording the record of survey. 9. All direct and indirect costs of the title translcr of the vacated right-of-way from public to private ownership, including but not limited to. title company charges, copying fees, and recording Ices, shall be paid by the proponent. The City shill not, and does not, assume any financial responsibility for any direct or indirect costa for the transfer of title. 10. The zoning district designation of the properties adjoining the street to be vacated shall be automatically extended over the entirety ol'Ihe y;Witt ion, and all area included in the vacation shall then and henceforth be subject to all regulations ol'the districts. The adopting Ordinance shall specify this zoning district extension inclusive of the applicable zonin i district designations. 11. The record of survey and certified copy o1'the Ordinance shall be recorded by the City Clerk in the office of the Spokane County Auditor. 12. All recording fees shall be paid by the proponent prior to recording. 13. All conditions of City Council authorization shall he fully satisfied prior to any transfer of title by the City. Findings and Recommendations orate Spokane Valley Planning Commission STV-2023-000i Page 3 or4 Approved this 1 l th day of May 21)23 'tanning Commission, Chairman ATTEST Marianne Lemons, Office Assistant Findings and Recommendations of the Spokane Valley Planning Commission STV-2023-0001 Page 4 044 Meeting Minutes Spokane Valley Planning Commission Room 109 — Centerplace Regional Event Center April 13, 2023 1. Planning Commission Vice -Chair Walt Haneke called the meeting to order at 6:05 p.m. The meeting was held in person and via. ZOOM meetings. II. Administrative Assistant Marianne Lemons took attendance, and the following members and staff were present: Susan Delucchi Val Dimitrov, absent Karl Granrath, absent Walt Haneke Bob McKinley Nancy Miller, absent Daniel Wilson Tony Beattie, City Senior Deputy Attorney Chaz Bates, Planning Manager Levi Basinger, Planner Chad Knodel, IT Manager Marianne Lemons, Administrative Assistant There was consensus from the Planning Commission to excuse Chairman Granrath, Commissioner Miller, & Commissioner Dimitrov. M. AGENDA: Commissioner Delucchi moved to approve the agenda for April 13, 2023 as presented. There was no discussion. The vote on the motion was four in favor; zero against and the motion passed. IV. MINUTES: Commissioner Wilson moved to approve the March 9, 2023 minutes as presented There was no discussion. The vote on the motion was four in favor, zero against and the motion passed. V. COMMISSION REPORTS: Commissioner Wilson reported that he attended the Spokane Valley 20-year celebration on April 1st, 2023. He stated that it was very well done and organized. Commissioner Wilson also reported that he visited the regional water/wastewater treatment facility. He gave a report of how the treatment facility works and encouraged the public to visit the facility. VI. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT: There was no' administrative report. VII. PUBLIC COMMENT: There was no public comment. VIII. COMMISSION BUSINESS: 4-13-2023 Planning Commission Minutes Page 2 of 5 a. Public Hearing; 2023 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendments The public hearing was opened at 6:12 p.m. Planner Levi Basinger gave a staff report. He explained that the Growth Management Act (GMA) allows local jurisdictions to consider amendments to their Comprehensive Plans once a year. The City received one proposed site -specific map amendment during the application timefrarne. Mr. Basinger stated that the applicant/owner of the proposed property change is the City of Spokane Valley. The requested amendment is to change the zoning from Single -Family Residential (SFR) and Neighborhood Commercial (NC) to Parks, Recreation, & Open Space (P/OS). The amendment will expand the P/OS zone by 23.9 acres. Mr. Basinger explained that multiple types of critical areas have been identified on site. The Critical Areas Map shows an existing stream/drainage channel on the north side of the site and the location of the floodplain. He explained that much of the site is defined as Flood Zone AO, which is defined as an area of shallow flooding, usually in the form of sheet flow, with an average depth ranging from 1 to 3 feet. Given the strict building requirements applied to structures in the floodplain, open fields allowing for passive or active recreation, with no or few structures, are ideal for locations such as these. In addition, there are several easements identified on or adjacent to the subject site. Mr. Basinger stated that the area is identified in the Parks & Recreation Master Plan. The change will provide new park space for residents in an area of the City that is lacking in park space. The proposed use is compatible with surrounding uses. The change will also preserve open space in the flood plain/critical areas. He stated that the City has determined that the site is not conducive for building but will serve well as park/open space land. Mr. Basinger reported that the Planning Department sent the proposed change out for agency, staff, and public comment (the notice was mailed to property owners within a 400-foot radius of the property and was posted on site). There were no staff or agency comments received and the City received three public comments. Two of the public comments were in favor of the proposal and the third comment requested that single-family development not be allowed on the property. Commissioner Haneke asked if the City has plans for developing the park. Mr. Basinger answered that the City has identified it as park area in the Master Plan but has not created definitive plans for development yet. Commissioner Delucchi asked the process for developing a new park. Mr. Bates answered that the Parks Department will create a formal master plan for the proposed space which will be done through a public input process. Barbara Bai-tak (Spokane Valley) stated that she lives across the street from the proposed property. She explained that the property is home to deer, pheasant, turkey & quails, and she 4-13-2023 Punning Commission Minutes Page 3 of 5 has concern about what will happen to the wildlife and native plants when the property is developed into a park. She expressed that she hopes the City will allow the public to provide input on the development of the park. Rick Donaldson (Spokane Valley) stated that the property is a habitat area with many different types of wildlife. He reported that he is a proponent of the proposal but would like to keep it open space if possible. Administrative Assistant Marianne Lemons read into the record a public comment received via email from Susan Brunenreier (Spokane Valley) stating that she is in favor of a natural park in that area and hopes that some wildlife and birds will make it their habitat, The public hearing was closed at 6:33 p.m. Commissioner Delucchi moved to recommend approval of CPA-2023-0001 to the City Council as presented. Commissioner Delucchi stated that she would like to see the area preserved as a natural wildlife park that could provide an opportunity for children to learn about the wildlife in the conununity. She said that she doesn't think it should be developed into a formal park area and would be better left in its natural state. Conunissioner Wilson commented that wildlife has occupied the proposed area for a long time, and he would also like to see the area left as it is currently. He doesn't think it makes sense to develop it in other ways. Commissioner McKinley said that he is in favor of the change and would also like to see it preserved in a natural state because the City needs areas for wildlife habitat. Connnissioner Haneke stated that he would like to see it zoned just open space instead of parks/open space because he would strongly like to see the property remain natural open space. He also mentioned that dumping has occurred on the property, and he hopes that the City will get that cleaned up and put something in place that would prevent that from happening again in the fiiture. The vote on the motion was four in favor, zero against and the motion passed. Mr. Basinger commented that the Findings Of Fact on this matter will be presented to the Commission at the April 27, 2023 meeting. b. Study Session: STV-2023-0001: Street Vacation - 22"a and Glenview Circle Planner Levi Basinger gave a staff report. He stated that the street vacation is privately initiated request from The Oaks Education Association to vacate 6,970 square feet (0.16 acres) of public right-of-way (ROW) in the alignment for Glenview Circle, located south of and adjacent to 22"d Avenue, 4-13-2023 Planning COMMIssioL1 Minutes Pagc 4 of 5 Mr. Basinger explained that the ROW proposed to be vacated comprises the fourth leg of the intersection between 22"d Avenue and Glenview Circle. The ROW was originally dedicated as part of the plat for Glenview Acres 3rd Addition in 1968. This leg of Glenview remains unimproved and does not extend further south. Mr. Basinger stated that the ROW is adjacent to two properties, parcels 45281.2104 and 45281.2802. Both parcels are owned by Oaks Education Association. The property owner has requested the 6,970 square feet of right-of-way be vacated because they believe it is no longer required for public access and the Oaks Academy expansion, located inunediately to the south, prevents a possible extension of Glenview Road further to the south. The applicant plans to build a private school on the parcel to the south. The school will be within the alignment for a possible right-of-way extension south. Access from 22"d is proposed via a private driveway but is currently located outside of the ROW. Building permits have been issued for the school's construction and site grading activities. The applicants will be using the ROW as a temporary construction entrance, but no permanent improvements have been approved within the existing ROW currently. Mr. Basinger said that staff and the utility providers have reviewed the proposal and have not expressed opposition to vacating the ROW but have requested the following conditions: 1. A new curb installed across the ROW to be vacated along the south side of 22"d Avenue. 2. The existing driveway approach for 11706 E 22"d Avenue must be modified to match installed curbing. 3. Construction within the public ROW roust be permitted and subject to inspection by the City. 4. Easements to allow for maintenance of existing utilities will need to be dedicated by the City prior to vacation. Conunissioner McKinley stated that he is not opposed to vacating the area since it has remained unimproved since the 1960's and the area doesn't serve a real purpose for the City. Mr. Basinger mentioned that the applicant, Oaks Education could move their driveway to the vacated area, but they would have to provide an updated plan for review. Commissioner Wilson asked if the utility companies will still have access to their lines. Mr. Basinger answered that the City will make sure that the proper easements are dedicated so that the utility companies have access. Commissioner Haneke expressed concern about the vacated area being used as a driveway. He stated that if it's going to be used as a driveway, the City should retain control of it so that the driveway is built to the City's street standards. Mr. Bates responded that the City's traffic engineer has reviewed the proposal and did not provide any comments. He will reach out to the engineers again and get additional information from them for the next meeting. 4-13-2023 Planning Commission Minutes Page 5 of 5 Commissioner Delucchi asked if the City gets paid when a street vacation occurs. Mr. Basinger answered that a compensation Resolution was passed that states the applicant must pay 50% of the assessed value of the vacated property. The property has been accessed at approximately $15,000.00. The public hearing for this item will be held on April 27, 2023. IX. GOOD OF THE ORDER: There was nothing offered for the Good Of The Order. X. ADJOURNMENT: Commissioner McKinley moved to adjourn the meeting al 7: 05 p.m. The vote on the motion was foam in favor, zero against, and the motion passed. Karl Granath, Chairman Date Signed Marianne Lemons, Secretary Meeting Minutes Spokane Valley Planning Commission Room 212 — Centerplace Regional Event Center April 27, 2023 I. Planning Commission Chairman Karl Granrath called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. The meeting was held in person and via ZOOM meetings. II. The Commissioners, staff, and audience stood for the Pledge Of Allegiance. III. Administrative Assistant Marianne Lemons took attendance, and the following members and staff were present: Susan Delucchi Val Dimitrov Karl Granrath Walt Haneke Bob McKinley Nancy Miller Daniel Wilson, absent Tony Beattie, City Senior Deputy Attorney Chaz Bates, Planning Manager Levi Basinger, Planner Greg Bingamin, IT Manager Marianne Lemons, Administrative Assistant There was consensus from the Planning Commission to excuse Commissioner Wilson from the meeting. IV. AGENDA: Commissioner Delucchi moved to approve the agenda for April 27, 2023 as presented. There was no discussion. The vote on the motion was six in favor, zero against and the motion passed. V. MINUTES: Commissioner Delucchi moved to approve the April 13, 2023 minutes as presented. There was no discussion. The vote on the motion was five in favor, zero against, Commissioner Granrath abstained from the vote, and the motion passed. VI. COMMISSION REPORTS: Commissioner Delucchi expressed concern that HB 1110 (the Missing Middle) passed through both houses of legislature and is ready for signature by the Governor. VII. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT: Planning Manager Chaz Bates gave an administrative report regarding the legislative bills that affect land use that were passed by legislation and are ready for signature. This included HB1110, HB1181, and Senate Bill 5058. Mr. Bates also reported that the City Council came to consensus to remove the owner occupancy requirement from Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) requests. This will be reviewed by the Planning Commission at a future meeting. VIII. PUBLIC COMMENT: There was no public comment. 4-27-2023 Planning Commission Minutes Page 2 of 5 IX. COMMISSION BUSINESS: a. Public Hearing: STV-2023-0001: 22' Avenue & Glenview Circle The public hearing was opened at 6:10 p.m. Planner Levi Basinger gave a staff report. He stated that the street vacation is privately initiated request from The Oaks Education Association to vacate 6,970 square feet (0.16 acres) of public right-of-way (ROW) in the alignment for Glenview Circle, located south of and adjacent to 22" d Avenue. Mr. Basinger explained that the ROW proposed to be vacated comprises the fourth leg of the intersection between 22nd Avenue and Glenview Circle. The ROW was originally dedicated as part of the plat for Glenview Acres 3rd Addition in 1968. This leg of Glenview remains unimproved and does not extend further south. Mr. Basinger stated that the Notice Of Public hearing was posted on the site, was published twice in the newspaper of record (The Valley Herald), written notice was mailed to the abutting properties, and the notice was posted in three public places. Mr. Basinger explained that the applicant plans to build a private school on the parcel to the south. The school will be within the alignment for a potential ROW extension to the south. Access from 22nd is proposed via a private driveway but is currently located outside of the ROW. Building permits have been issued for the school's construction and site grading activities. The applicants will be using the ROW as a temporary construction entrance, but no permanent improvements have been approved within the existing ROW currently. Mr. Basinger said that staff and the utility providers have reviewed the proposal and have not expressed opposition to vacating the ROW but have requested the following conditions: 1. A new curb installed across the ROW to be vacated along the south side of 22nd Avenue. 2. The existing driveway approach for 11706 E 22nd Avenue must be modified to match installed curbing. 3. Construction within the public ROW must be permitted and subject to inspection by the City. 4. Easements to allow for maintenance of existing utilities will need to be dedicated by the City prior to vacation. S. All costs incurred must be paid by the proponent. 6. The proponent is to purchase the area to be vacated. (The cost is calculated by the formula adopted in City Council Resolution 2022-020. The total amount due is $15,111.00). Mr. Basinger stated that staff has reviewed the criteria outlined in the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) for street vacations and feel that the request will meet all the requirements once all the conditions of approval are met. 4-27-2023 Planning Commission Minutes Page 3 of 5 Mr. Basinger said that the City received several public comments regarding the proposal. The residents had concerns about traffic on 22nd Avenue. He explained that the City Traffic Engineer does not support the use of this vacated ROW to be used as access to the site. A fire access lane to the west of this vacated property has been approved and any changes to that proposed access would need to be reviewed by the Traffic Engineer for compliance with traffic circulation. Commissioner Haneke asked if the applicants could come to the City in the future to request making this access a driveway. If so, could a condition be placed on the property that would not allow them to do so. Mr. Basinger answered that a change to the driveway would require applying for an approach permit that would be reviewed by City development and traffic engineers. The applicant, Charlie Dowers (Head of School for Oaks Academy) stated that the school is currently housed within eight structures on the property and are in the process of building one large school so that all the students will be centralized in one location. He also stated that currently the ROW is supposed to be maintained by and at the cost of the City. If the vacation of the property is approved, the City will no longer be liable for that maintenance. He also stated that the school size will not be increasing with the new building and will not change the parking needs. Public Testimony: Nan Smith (Spokane Valley) stated that she is in favor of the street vacation because it has been a weed lot for 30 years. However, she would like the space to be used as green or park space only and not used for parking or as a driveway due to the safety of children walking on 22nd Avenue. Greg Doering (Spokane Valley) expressed concern about the City gifting property to a private Christian school and concern about traffic and children's safety if the area is used for parking, pickup, or drop off. He said that he would like to see the area used as a green space only and not as an access or driveway. Jim Rowse (Spokane Valley) expressed concern about the deceased owner being listed on the application. He also provided a photo of the area showing the proposed vacation that was provided to the Commission. He expressed that the paperwork submitted by the Oak lists that the area could be used as parking or open space. He feels that there is a significant difference between those two items and would like to see the area just. used as open space. He also expressed concern about the safety of the children and is against the vacation as parking or access to the facility. He would like to see the space remain as open green space. Thomas Santorsla (Spokane Valley) expressed concern about the traffic and the vagueness in the application about what The Oaks Academy plans to do with the property in the future. He stated that he would like to see a better presented plan of what they are proposing. Art Zach (Spokane Valley) stated that the application does not specifically say that the area will not be used as a parking lot that accesses onto 22"d Avenue. He also expressed concern that the fire access curb cut could be used as an access point for more than just 4-27-2023 Planning Commission Minutes Page 4 of 5 fire personnel. He feels that 22nd Avenue cannot handle any additional traffic that might be produced from an additional driveway or access point from this vacated area. Doyle Kanabica (Spokane Valley) stated that The Oaks has a sidewalk that will go along 22nd Avenue to the new property to help with the concern about children walking on the street. The Oaks hopes that this new sidewalk will help alleviate some of those problems and concerns. Mr. Alt Zach stated that he is happy that the sidewalk improvement is being done but does not feel that it will resolve the problem if the vacated area is used as an access that will put more cars on 22nd Avenue. Commissioner Miller asked the applicant about utilizing the vacated area as just green or open space. Mr. Charlie Dowers stated that the school has not researched a 20-year site development plan for the property. He stated that he would feel uncomfortable stating that without reviewing if it is the best use of the space long term. Commissioner Granrath asked if a condition could be placed on the property prohibiting the vacated area from being used as access in the future. Mr. Bates answered that the City could not be able to attach that type of condition on the property. Commissioner Deluechi asked if the City could require that the curb and sidewalk be extended all the way through the vacated property to help prohibit it from being used as an access or driveway. Mr. Basinger responded that the City does have a condition of approval regarding curbs and sidewalks that will have to be met before the plat is signed and the final vacation is completed. He also explained that any future changes to the area making it a driveway or access point would require City review and approval. The Senior Traffic Engineer has documented that he is not in favor of the area being used as access. The public hearing closed at 6:54 p.m. Commissioner McKinley moved to recommend approval of STV 2023-0001 to the City Council as presented. Commissioner Haneke stated that he is extremely concerned about the property being used as a driveway and would really like to see a condition that would keep that from happening in the future. Commissioner Miller agreed. Commissioner Delucehi said that requiring a curb and sidewalks that extends all the way to the vacated property could keep a driveway from happening. Commissioner Granrath commented that this ROW could have been used as a street since the inception of the plat in 1968 but it has never been used as an access. The City Street Engineer has stated that he does not support allowing a driveway at this location so he feels that it will never be allowed as a driveway or access onto 22nd Avenue. 4-27-2023 Planning Commission Minutes Page 5 of 5 Commissioner McKinley said that he feels approving the street vacation will make it more difficult for the applicant to use the property as a driveway in the future. Commissioner Haneke agreed. The vote on the motion was six in favor, zero against and the motion passed. Commissioner Delucchi requested that the Planning Commissions concerns be noted in the Findings of Fact and forwarded to the City council for consideration and discussion. Mr. Basinger said that the Findings Of Fact on this matter will be presented to the Commission at the May 11, 2023, meeting. b. Findings of Fact: 2023 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendments Planner Levi Basinger presented the Findings of Fact for the Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendments. He explained that the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed CPA on April 13, 2023. The Planning Commission deliberated on the CPA and voted unanimously to forward the proposed amendments to the City Council as presented. He explained that the Findings of Fact will formalize the recommendations that were made at the public hearing. Commissioner Delucchi noted a typo on page 3, paragraph 21. Commissioner McKinley moved to approve and forward the Findings of Fact to the City Council as presented There was no discussion. The vote on the motion was six in favor, zero against and the motion passed. X. GOOD OF THE ORDER: Commissioner Delucchi requested that the staff give a formal update and analyzation of the impacts of HB1110 to the Planning Commission once it is signed into effect. XL ADJOURNMENT: Commissioner Haneke moved to adjourn the meeting at 7:17 p.m. The vote on the motion was six in favor, zero against, and the motion passed. Karl Granrath, Chairman Date Signed Marianne Lemons, Secretary SpokaneCITY OF .000V ley COMMUNITY AND PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING &PLANNING STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION FILE: STV-2023-0001 STAFF REPORT DATE: April 20, 2023 FILE NO: STV-2023-0001 PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: Request to vacate 6,900-square feet of public unimproved right- of-way located south of to the intersection of 22"d Avenue and Glenview Circle. STAFF PLANNER: Levi Basinger, Planner APPLICANT: Oaks Education Association PROPERTY OWNER: Oaks Education Association PROPOSAL LOCATION: The piece of public right-of-way proposed to be vacated is located south of the intersection of 22"d Avenue and Glenview Circle. It is adjacent to parcels 45281.2802 and 45281.2104; further located in the northeast quarter of Section 28, Township 25 North, Range 44 East Willamette Meridian, Spokane Valley, Spokane County, Washington. BACKGROUND: On April 4, 2023, City Council approved Resolution No. 23-005 to set the public hearing date for April 27, 2023, to consider the privately initiated request to vacate approximately 6,900-square feet (0.16 acres) of public right of way. The right-of-way requested to be vacated comprises unimproved leg of the intersection between 22nd Avenue and Glenview Circle. The right of way was originally dedicated in 1968 by the Glenview Acres 3rd Addition Plat. This leg of Glenview is unimproved and does not extend further south. There is an existing curb return at the point where the unimproved right of way intersects 22nd Avenue. In addition, a driveway approach serving 11706 E 22nd Avenue (Parcel 45281.2104), is located within the curb return at the southeastern corner of the intersection. The right-of-way is adjacent to two properties, Parcels 45281.2104 and 45281.2802. Both parcels are owned by Oaks Education Association. The property owner has requested the 6,900 square feet of right-of-way be vacated and aggregated into the adjacent properties. Furthermore, the future location for the Oaks Academy, currently under construction and located immediately to the south, prevents the extension of Glenview Road further to the south. Staff Report and Recommendation STV-2023-0001 Page 1 of 7 April 20, 2023 As a condition for vacating the unimproved right of way, Development Engineering will require the existing curb returns be removed and a new curb be installed along the southern portion of 22nd Avenue, across the vacated right of way. The existing driveway approach for 11706 E 22nd Avenue will be modified to match the new curbing. Construction in the right of way will require permits to be issued and inspections to be performed by the City. Both the Applicant and staff contacted utility providers to determine whether existing utilities will be affected. According to comments received, utilities pass through the piece of right-of-way in question. Lumen has indicated a buried copper cable that they maintain passes east -west across the southern portion of the right of way, and Modern Electric Water Company has identified an overhead power line traversing east -west at the southern end of the right of way. As a condition of approval utility easements will be required prior to the vacation to allow utility providers to access and maintain their facilities. APPROVAL CRITERIA: 1. Chapter 22.140 SVMC — Street Vacations 2. City of Spokane Valley Street Standards ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit 1: Application Packet Exhibit 2: Notice of Public Hearing Exhibit 3: Staff Comments Exhibit 4: Agency Comments Exhibit 5: Public Comments . PROPERTY INFORMATION Size and Characteristics of proposed vacation: The area to be vacated is the unimproved fourth leg of an existing street intersection and totals approximately 6,900 square feet (0.16 acres). Adjacent Comprehensive Plan Designation: Single Family Residential (SFR) Adjacent Zoning: R-2, Single Family Residential Suburban Adjacent Land Use(s): North & East — residential; South & West — vacant/future school H. STAFF ANALYSIS OF STREET VACATION PROPOSAL A. COMPLIANCE WITH SVIVIC 22.140.030 Findings: 1. Whether a change of use or vacation of the street or alley will better serve the public? The area proposed to be vacated is surrounded on three sides by private property. Although it is unimproved, the City is obligated to maintain and prohibit encroachments into the right-of- way. The adjacent property owner desires to take ownership and maintenance of the area and improve it as part of their private property. The City's Senior Traffic Engineer supports the Staff Report and Recommendation STV-2023-0001 April 20, 2023 Page 2 of 7 vacation with a driveway access as proposed on the site plan approved with the Trip Generation and Distribution Letter, which is to the west of the proposed vacation. Traffic does not support the use of the area proposed to be vacated as access to school development and a condition to curb the right-of-way has been included. The vacation of this right-of-way will better serve the public by reducing maintenance obligations of the City, eliminating a potential safety hazard at an existing street intersection, and allowing full development of the adjacent private property. The vacation is expected to have no impact on the general public. 2. Whether the street or alley is no longer required for public use or public access? The area proposed to be vacated is currently unimproved and is not being used for public access. The street is no longer required for public use or access. Development immediately to the south precludes the extension of the public street in its current alignment. It is not required for current or future public access or use. Improvements within the vacated right of way will be conditioned at time of future development. 3. Whether the substitution of a new and different public way would be more useful to the public? There is no substitution being proposed as part of the vacation. The City's review has determined there is no need for a new or different public way. The right of way was originally dedicated as part of the plat for Glenview Acres 3rd Addition in 1968 as the fourth leg of the intersection between 22nd Avenue and Glenview Circle. The south leg of the intersection, and the large tracts of land south of 22nd Avenue have remained largely undeveloped. As a result, the intersection between 22nd and Glenview has functioned as a three-way intersection since its initial construction. No additional right of way is needed to substitute the subject right of way to be vacated. 4. Whether conditions may so change in the future as to provide a greater use or need than presently exists? Development immediately to the south precludes a future extension of the public street. No changes would occur in the future that would require the use of the subject right-of-way for public access. 5. Whether objections to the proposed vacation are made by owners of private property (exclusive of petitioners) abutting the street or alley or other governmental agencies or members of the general public? Notice of the public hearing was made by posting written notice at City Hall, CenterPlace, and the Valley Iibrary; publishing notice in the Spokane Valley Herald; and posting at the right-of- way to be vacated. A direct mailing was provided to the property owners adjacent to the proposed vacation. No objections by the utility providers or governmental agencies have been received. One public objection has been received as of the date of this staff report, with concerns that allowing the property owner to use the vacated right of way for access would create more traffic locally. Conclusion(s): The findings confirm criteria set forth in SVMC 22.140.030 have been met. Staff Report and Recommendation STV-2023-0001 Page 3 of 7 April 20, 2023 $, COMPLIANCE WITH TITLE 21 SVMC — ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROLS The Planning Division has reviewed the proposed project and has determined that the project is categorically exempt pursuant to WAC 197-11-800(2)(i) and SVMC 21.20.040 from environmental review under the provisions of the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). Conclusion: The requirements of Title 21 SVMC have been met. HI.PUBLIc COMMENTS Findings: One public comment has been received following the notice of public hearing. Date Name & Address Comment(s) 4-19-2023 Jim Rowse rim a,extraink.com Concerns include: • Application fornn has incorrect property owner listed for parcel at 11706 E 22nd Avenue • Increase in traffic on local street • Applicant vague about planned uses for vacated right of way Staffs responses to public comment: 1. The application form lists the previous property owner for 11706 E 22nd Ave (Parcel 45281.2104), one of the two parcels that abut the right of way to be vacated. However, staff confirmed that the Oaks Education Association is the owner of both parcels. The property at 11706 E 22nd Avenue was purchased from Sheila A. Vigue by the Oaks Education Association in December 2022, and the street vacation application form was submitted February 2023. 2. According to the site plan of record for the Oaks Classical Christian Academy (perrnit no. BLD-2022-1142), a new private school building being built by the property owner, includes a driveway and approach from 22nd Avenue for a fire access lane. The fire access lane is identified as west of the right of way to be vacated. The right of way to be vacated is currently used as a temporary construction access. Any proposed changes to access from 22nd Avenue, including the addition of parking, would be reviewed by staff for compliance and traffic circulation would need to be considered. 3. The applicant indicates the vacated right of way would become part of the proposed private school development as either parking or open space. Both possible uses would be allowed onsite as part of the school site. Future proposals for parking or other site improvements within the vacated portion of right of way would need to be reviewed for compliance. A Notice of Public Hearing sign was posted on April 7, 2023 in the area proposed to be vacated. Notices were posted in the Spokane Valley Public Library, City of Spokane Valley main reception area and CenterPlace Event Center on April 5, 2023. The public hearing notice was mailed to all owners adjacent to the area proposed to be vacated on April 7, 2023. The notice was published in the Spokane Valley Herald on April 7, 2023 and April 14, 2023. Staff Report and Recommendation STV-2023-0001 Page 4 of 7 April 20, 2023 Conclusion(s): The City has met the noticing requirements for street vacations as required in SVMC 22.140.020(F). IV. AGENCY COMMENTS Request for comments from agencies and service providers was sent on March 15, 2023, as part of the initial assessment of the street vacation. A notice of the public hearing was provided to agencies and service providers again on April 5, 2023. Comments were received from the following agencies and are attached as exhibits to this staff report. Where necessary, comments have been incorporated into the recommended conditions of approval in Section V. Agency Received Comments Comments Dated City of Spokane Valley Public Works - Engineering Yes 3-1-2023 City of Spokane Valley Public Works — Storm.water Yes 3-1-2023 City of Spokane Valley Public Works - Traffic Yes 3-1-2023 City of Spokane Valley Public Works —Maintenance Yes 3-1-2023 Spokane Valley Fire District No.1 Yes 3-16-2023 Spokane County Public Works - Wastewater Yes 3-16-2023 Spokane Regional Health District No Spokane Transit Authority No Modern Electric Water Company Yes 1-23-2023 Avista Utilities Yes 1-18-2023 Lumen Yes 3-17-2023 Comcast No Findings: The application was routed to jurisdictional agencies, utilities, and public districts for review and comment. According to comments received, utilities are located within the right of way to be vacated. Utility easements will need to be dedicated, allowing utility providers to maintain facilities. As long as easement rights for utilities are retained, no public agencies or utility providers are opposed to the proposed vacation. Conclusion(s): Staff concludes that jurisdictional agencies, utilities, and or public districts have no concerns regarding the proposed vacation of public right-of-way. V. OVERALL CONCLUSIONS AND FINDINGS Staff concludes that STV-2023-0001 as proposed is consistent, or will be made consistent, through the recommended conditions of approval based on the approval criteria stated herein. RECOMMENDATION: Approve the request to vacate approximately 6,900 square feet of right of way south of the intersection for 22nd Avenue and Glenview Circle and adjacent to parcel numbers 45281.2802 and 45281.2104 subject to the following conditions: Staff Report and Recommendation STV-2023-0001 Page 5 of 7 April 20, 2023 I. Initial work to satisfy conditions of the street vacation (File No. STV-2023-0001), including all conditions below shall be submitted to the City for review within 90 days following the effective date of approval by the City. 2. The vacated property shall be transferred one half to each owner of the abutting parcels, parcel numbers 45281.2802 and 45281.2104, as shown on the record of survey created and recorded with Spokane County Auditor's Office pursuant to condition 3 belowd. Such property shall become part of each abutting parcel. 3. Following the City Council's passage of the ordinance approving the street vacation, a record of survey of the area to be vacated, prepared by a registered surveyor in the State of Washington, including an exact metes and bounds legal description, and specifying any and all applicable easements for construction, repair and maintenance of existing and future utilities and services, shall be completed. 4. The adjacent property owners shall purchase from the City the public right of way to be vacated consistent with Resolution 22-020. The exact cost of purchase shall be determined by the final square footage of the area to be vacated according to the record of survey. 5. An easement acceptable to Lumen and Modern Electric Water Company for access and maintenance of existing utilities within the area to be vacated shall be established. The location and recording number shall be shown on the record of survey. 6. The existing curb returns at Glenview Circle shall be removed and Type 'A' curb shall be installed along 22nd Avenue across the vacated portion of Glenview Circle per Standard Plan R- 102 prior to recording the record of survey. The applicant shall meet the following requirements during and after construction: a. Construction within the public right-of-way shall be performed under the direct supervision of a licensed Washington State Professional Engineer and in accordance with the Spokane Valley Street Standards. All work is subject to inspection by the City of Spokane Valley Development Engineering Construction Inspector. b. Upon completion of the improvements, a Construction Certification package per Spokane Valley Street Standards (SVSS) Chapter 9 shall be submitted and approved prior to recording of the Street Vacation Ordinance. c. A Warranty Surety shall be provided for the public improvements per SVSS Chapter 9. 7. The existing driveway approach for 11706 E. 22nd Avenue shall be extended to the required Type `A' curb and installed per Std. Plan R-110 prior to recording the record of survey. 8. Any unpaved area located north of the required Type `A' curb within the proposed vacated area shall be paved per Std. Plan R-120 prior to recording the record of survey. 9. All direct and indirect costs of the title transfer of the vacated right-of-way from public to private ownership, including but not limited to, title company charges, copying fees, and recording fees, shall be paid by the proponent. The City shall not, and does not, assume any financial responsibility for any direct or indirect costs for the transfer of title. 10. The zoning district designation of the properties adjoining the street to be vacated shall be automatically extended over the entirety of the vacation, and all area included in the vacation shall then and henceforth be subject to all regulations of the districts. The adopting Ordinance Staff Report and Recommendation STV-2023-0001 Page 6 of 7 April 20, 2023 shall specify this zoning district extension inclusive of the applicable zoning district designations. 11. The record of survey and certified copy of the Ordinance shall be recorded by the City Clerk in the office of the Spokane County Auditor. 12. All recording fees shall be paid by the proponent prior to recording. 13. All conditions of City Council authorization shall be fully satisfied prior to any transfer of title by the City. Staff Report and Recommendation STV-2023-0001 Page 7 of 7 April 20, 2023 Exhibit 1 SflISTREET VACATION APLICATION p0�{ane SVNIC 22.140 40I0 Valley 10210 E Sprague AvAue,#'gpokane Vaily WA 99206 Phone: (509) 720-5240 ♦ Fox: (509) 720-5075 ♦ permitcenter0).spokanevaliey.or, STAFF USE ONLY fitr Date Submitted: U IC' Received by: , , _ Fee: "/ j Li Yi 7 . �y PLUS #: File #: : ,a t V _ Z 7'7C)0 0 I PART I — REQUIRED MATERIAL "THE APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF THE REQUIRED MATERIALS ARE NOT PROVIDED" ▪ Completed Application Form ❑ Application Fee 'Tn BE PAID AT TIME OF APPLICA'I'IO?M SUBMITTALS ❑■ Notice of Application Packet (17.80.110) — Adjacent Property(ies) El Written Narrative — A written narrative describing the reasons for the proposed street vacation, the physical limits of the proposed street vacation and the public benefit of the proposed street vacation. [■7 Written Correspondence from Utility Purveyors elephoneCable aElectric _ Other (Specify )_� Ater District Fire District ,/ Gas Utility Sewer Utility ■❑ Vicinity Map — Submit a map showing the general area of the proposed vacation El Record of Survey, if available, for the subject street and/or alley proposed for vacation, and abutting properties, streets and alleys within 100 feet on all sides of the proposed vacation. • Written Evidence of all easements, allowances or reservations, if available, pertaining to the street and/or alley proposed for vacation. PART II — APPLICATION INFORMATION APPLICANT NAME: Simpson Engineers Inc. (Nick McGill) MAILING ADDRESS: 909 N. Argonne Rd. CITY: Spokane Valley STATE: WA ZIP: 99212 PHONE: (509 )926-1322 FAX: CELL: nnncglll@simpsonengineers.com EMAIL: PROPERTY OWNER NO, 1: Oaks Education Association MAILING ADDRESS: 2303 S Bowdish Rd CITY: Spokane Valley STATE: zip:99206 PL-15 V1.0 Page 1 of Exhibit 1 Spokane Valley STRUT VACATION APPLICATION PHONE: FAX: CELL: EMAIL: PROPERTY OWNER NO. 2: Sheila i ue MAILING ADDRESS: 11 706 E 22nd 22nd Ave CITY: Spokane Valley STATE: WA Z,P: 99206 PHONE: FAX: CELL: EMAIL: If more than two (2) abutting property owners, include information and written authorization on a separate sheet of paper for each. NAME OF STREETIALLEY TO BE VACATED: E Glenview Rd DIMENSIONS OF STREET/ALLEY TO BE VACATED: (130 FT LONG) X (50 FT WIDE) SQUARE FEET OF STREET/ALLEY TO BE VACATED: 6,800 SOFT A 1 ns(34- I, 1 ABUTTING TAX PARCEL NOS ,: &2e 5-ZS • Z' OZ. 11706 E-2-219f1-Ave-- ADDRESSES OF ABUTTING PARCELS: 1 ! i-fl E V-(' Ave - ZONING DESIGNATION: R-2 THE FOLLOWING IS CRITERIA EVALUATED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION IN FORMULATING A RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL, ON A SEPARATE SHEET OF PAPER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS SHALL BE ANSWERED IN A DETAILED MANNER; *ALL QUESTIONS ADDEESSSED BY SIMPSON ENGINEERS IN A'I"rACI~HD APPENDIX. 1, How DOES A CHANGE OF USE OR VACATION OF THE STREET/ALLEY IMPROVE SERVICE TO THE PUBLIC? 2. IS THE STREET OR ALLEY NO LONGER REQUIRED FOR PUBLIC USE OR PUBLIC ACCESS? EXPLAIN. 3. WOULD SUBSTITUTION OF A NEW AND/OR DIFFERENT PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY BETTER SERVE THE PUBLIC? EXPLAIN. 4. How WILL USE OR NEED FOR THIS RIGHT-OF-WAY BE AFFECTED BY FUTURE CONDITIONS? EXPLAIN. 5. WILL EASEMENTS BE RETAINED FOR ALL UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD UTILITIES? THE REQUESTED VACATION IS LOCATED IN THE SERVICE AREA OF WHAT UTILITY COMPANIES. (SPECIFY)? 6. DOES THE RIGHT-OF-WAY INCLUDE STORMWATER DRAINAGE FACILITIES (SPECIFY)? PLEASE NOTE: PER RCW 35.79.040 (TITLE TO VACATED STREET/ALLEY), THE PROPERTY WITHIN A PUBLIC STREET OR ALLEY VACATED BY THE CITY COUNCIL SHALL BELONG TO THE ABUTTING PROPERTY OWNERS, ONE-HALF (1/2) TO EACH. THEREFORE, PROPERTY OWNER SHALL BE REQUIRED TO SIGN THE STREET VACATION APPLICATION. PL-15 V1.0 Page 2 of Exhibit 1 *lane P .000 Vial ley STREET VACATION APPLICATION PER RESOLUTION 07-009 OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, THE CITY COUNCIL HAS THE AUTHORITY TO IMPOSE CHARGES FOR STREET/ALLEY VACATION PURSUANT TO RCW 36.79.030 PART 111 — AUTHORIZATION (Signature of owner or authorized representative) d I4(i M 2 E i 11 , (print name swear or affirm that the above responses are made nd to the best of my k ignature) NOTARY STATE OF WASHINGTON) ss: COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) (Date) 4.+ SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this 1 day of F{- b060=-1 , 20 2 3 NOTARY SEAL Matthew James Kelly State of Washington Notary Public Commission No, 205270 My Commission Expires 01111/2027 77rft'4°A ,41 NOTAR SIGNATURE Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Residing at: "� % c V r \nl My appointmentexpires: .1 j t LI / 2 7 LEGAL OWNER NO. 1 AUTHORIZATION: If the applicant is not the legal owner(s), the owner must provide the following acknowledgement; 1, inoizev- s , owner of the above described ra ert do herebproperty Y Y authorize /VrJ( fle.(-,JIf regarding this application. to represent me and my interests in all matters LEGAL OWNER NO. 2 AUTHORIZATION: If the applicant is not the legal owner(s), the owner must provide the following acknowledgement; PL-15 VI Page 3 of Exhibit 1 Stiokane P Valle STREET VACATION APPLICATION (11.Nrlief D01.4.96,,CS , owner of the above described property do hereby authorize /Vick t1c&ill to represent me and my interests in all matters regarding this application. PL-15 V1.0 Page 4 of Exhibit I APPENDIX J. HOW DC}FS A CHANGE OF USE OR VACATION OF TI IF STREET/ALLEY IMPROVE SLRVI(.F IcI IIIf" PIIBIIC:' a. THE VACATION OF THIS STRET LEG WILL REDUCE PUBLIC RISK BY TRANSFORMING A 4-WAY INTERSECTION INTO A 3-WAY INTERSECTION. L. IS 1 HE STREET OR ALLEY NO LONGER REQUIRED I (AL PUBLIC USE OF PUBLIC ACCESS? EXPLAIN. a. NO, THIS STREET LEG NO LONGER SERVES, OR HAS POTENTIAL TO SERVE, THE PUBLIC AS PUBLIC ACCESS. 3. We )[ II 1 `,i IBST111_I I ION OF A NEW AND/OR DIFFERENT PUBLIC. RIGHT-OF-WAY BETTER SERV1 1 IL I'Illtl I( ,' I •;I'l AIN. a. NO, THE CURRENT NEIGHBORHOOD I5 ADEQUATELY SERVED BY THE REMAINING RIGHT-OF-WAYS. 4. HOW WII V 1 ",! I'. NELD FOR i I lily MGM IT_0E-WAY BE AFI F( I i) 1'`, CONID11I(iiH a. FUTURE, AND CURRENT, DEVELOPMENT OF THE OAKS ACADEMY LESSEN THE NECESSITY FOR THIS RIGHT-OF-WAY AND THE LAND WOULD BE BETTER SERVED AS A PORTION OE THE OAKS SCHOOL DEVELOPMENT FOR PARKING OR OPEN SPACE. 5 V1111 1 IvILN.I ICI RL_TAINI I 1 )It AEI. tJNI)l It (:iI OIJ1,11) AND (.)VFF;I IL/\I) U1II_I I II THE RLC)UESiED VACATION IS 1 (A. ATM IN 111E SERVICE AREA OF WFIA-f UTILITY COMPANIES. (SPE( !FYI? a. YES, ALL EXISTING UNDER GROUND AND OVERHEAD UTILITIES SHALL BE RETAINED. b. THE FOLLOWING UTILITY COMPANIES SERVE THIS AREA: • MODERN ELECTRIC WATER COMPANY (WATER & POWER) • AVISTA (GAS) • SPOKANE COUNTY WASTEWATER SYSTEM DIVISION (SEWER) • CENTURY LINK • COMCAST (6, DOES TI IF RIGHT r -V1/AY INCI.IIF)F STORIV1VWI l ER DRAINAGE FACILITIES (SPECIFY)? a. NO STORMWATER DRAINAGE FACILITIES PRESENT. Exhibit 1 Project Narrative The Oaks Education Association is requesting to vacate that portion of Glenview Road lying south of 22"'r Avenue and north of parcel 445281.2802, parcel owned by Oaks Education Academy, and totaling to approximately 0.I6-acres. Said portion of Glenview Road is a dead-end ROW that terminates at said parcel, Said parcel is currently being developed as a private school, City of Spokane Valley permits BLD-2022-1 142 and EGR-2022-0051. The development plans are not conducive to extending Glenview Road through said parcel which will leave it as a dead-end ROW. Said portion of Glenview Road currently is unimproved. No demo is required to vacate said portion, and a vacation allows the Oaks Education Academy to extend sidewalk along 22" Avenue and additional 70 feet across the existing said portion of Glenview Road. No existing lots take access from said portion of Glenview Road. The adjacent properties are zoned R-2. This area is served by Modern Electric Water Company (water), Spokane County Environmental Services (sewer), Spokane Valley Fire Department (fire), Avista (electric/gas), and Century Link (telephone/cable) per One -Call design information request. All other adjacent land is developed as single-family homes. The applicant feels this project is in compliance with the applicable sections of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code and other applicable regulations. JT ✓yc�—� 1 V_.�F [CFI (0 2Il7 cc- 41.1 I9 ..._ __. 1.1 1 i "Exhibit 1 Nick McGiII From: Lange, Connor <Connor,Lange@avistacorp.com> Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2023 3:25 PM To: Nick McGill Cc: Aaron Simpson Subject: RE: [External] RE: Glenview Cir - Street Vacation Request Attachments: Screenshot 2023-01-18 152405.jpg We only have gas and its within 22"d Ave (see attached). From: Nick McGill <nmcgill@simpsonengineers.com> Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2023 3:01 PM To: Lange, Connor <Connor.Lange@avistacorp.com> Cc: Aaron Simpson <aaron@simpsonengineers.com> Subject: RE: [External] RE: Glenview Cir - Street Vacation Request Connor, Below is a copy of the original email and image sent to Jason: "Does Avista have any comments or recommendations regarding the proposed street vacation of Glenview Rd lying south of 22"d Ave and north of parcel #45281.2802 (shown below)? Also, could you please send me any utility maps that you have in this location, and I will add them in our CAD drawing and show them in all of our submittals moving forward." 'Exhibit 1 Avista has reviewed this potential street vacation and notes that we don't have any facilities within the ROW. Thank you From: Ren, Jason <jason.ren@avistacorp.com> Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2023 12:27 PM To: Lange, Connor <Connor.Lange@avistacorp.com> Subject: FW: [External] RE: Glenview Cir - Street Vacation Request Connor received this email about a Vacation in the Spokane Valley from Simpson Engineers Could you contact them and do the sign off. It out side of my scope of work. Jason Jason R I.en GIS Analyst PO Box 3727 MSC-1 'i Spokane, WA 99120 1411 I, Mission P 509.495.2115 http://w~v .avistautilities.com It's easier to think outside the box when you don't know where "The Box" is From: Nick McGill <nmcgill@simpsonengineers.com> Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2023 11:48 AM To: Ren, Jason <jason.ren@avistacorp.com> Cc: Aaron Simpson <aaron@simpsonengineers.com> Subject: [External] RE: Glenview Cir - Street Vacation Request You don't often yet email from nmcgillPsimpsonengineers.corn. Learn why this is important We are finally getting back around to this. Can you please respond stating whether or not there any no conflicts with this street vacation? If so, please state what they are and we will work to address them. For now, all we need is to show that we had correspondence. Thanks, 3 Exhibit 1 4 Exhibit 1 Nick McGill From: ES Plan Review<ESPIanReview@spokanecounty.org> Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2022 11;24 AM To: Nick McGill Subject: RE: Glenview Cir - Street Vacation Request Has this already been run through the city and been assigned a planning number? Typically the City would forward us the application packet for comments but I don't thinks we have seen anything. We will most likely have no comment as there is no public sewer in the area noted. Sincerely, Adam Smith Engineering Tech III Spokane County Public Works — Wastewater System Division 1026 W. Broadway Ave, 4th floor Spokane, WA 99260 From: Nick McGill <nmcgill@simpsonengineers.com> Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2022 9:48 AM To: ES Plan Review<ESPlanReview@spokanecounty.org> Subject: Glenview Cir - Street Vacation Request Environmental Services, Does Spokane County Environmental Services have any comments or recommendations regarding the proposed street vacation of Glenview Rd lying south of 22" Ave and north of parcel #45281.2802 (shown below)? We already have your utility maps for this location, and I will show them in all of our submittals moving forward. 1 Exhibit 1 Nick McGiII From: Jason Beesley<jbeesley@moderneiectricwater.com> Sent: Monday, January 23, 2023 10:54 AM To: Nick McGill; joey@tiltonexcavation.com Cc: Aaron Simpson; Chris Wafstet Subject: RE: Glenview Cir - Street Vacation Request Nick, Joey and I spoke about this already. There is no water infrastructure going south on Glenview Cir from the 22" Ave mainline. Confirming no conflicts for water. Jasbvi Yeesle+i Water Superin t el i den t Modern Electric Water Company 904 North Pines Rd Spokane Valley, WA 99206 o: 509-928-4540 d: 509-755-9009 c: 509-879-6417 1141111111 Yt� '3M Call MODERN Electric Water Company •aft, .*_—. rM •A.! before you dlg. From: Nick McGill <nmcgill@simpsonengineers.com> Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2023 11:47 AM To: Jason Beesley<jbeesiey@modernelectricwater.com>; Chris Wafstet<cwafstet@modernelectricwater.com> Cc: Aaron Simpson <aaron@simpsonengineers.com> Subject: RE: Glenview Cir - Street Vacation Request Jason and Chris, We are finally getting back around to this. Can you please respond stating whether or not there any no conflicts with this street vacation? if so, please state what they are and we will work to address them. For now, all we need is to show that we had correspondence. Thanks, i Exhibit 1 Nick McGill From: Chris Wafstet <cwafstet@moclernelectricwater.cam> Sent: Monday, January 23, 2023 12:26 PM To: Nick McGill; Jason Beesley; Gus Laramie Cc: Aaron Simpson; joey@tiltonexcavation.com Subject: RE: Glenview Cir - Street Vacation Request Good afternoon Nick: The only conflict with the electric is a single-phase overhead line that is at the southern portion of the proposed street vacation. Besides that, there is nothing underground in the way of electric that would be a conflict/issue: Any other questions, please let me know, Thank You at-+-iy Wa f9f0- GIS Operator Modern Electric Water Company Phone: (509} 928-4540 Direct: (509) 755-9006 cwafstet@mewco.com 1 '1 EST 1005 Call MODERN Eiectric Water Company re4iably serving the Spoi‘ane Valley since 19OS before you dig. 1 Exhibit 1 8/2/2022 Simpson Engineers Attn: Nick McGill, F_.I.T 909 N, Argonne Rd. Spokane Valley, WA 99212 r � CenturyLink SEP-2022-005- The Oaks Academy No Reservations/No Objection SUBJECT: Request to Vacate/Abandon a portion of road right of way, known as Glenview Cir., South of 22nd Ave and north of parcel 45281.2802 located in Spokane Valley, Spokane County, Washington. To Whom It May Concern: Qwest Corporation d/b/a CENTURYLINK QC ("CenturyLink") has reviewed the request for the subject vacation and has determined that it has no objections with respect to the areas proposed for vacation as shown and/or described on Exhibit "A", said Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated by this reference. It is the intent and understanding of CenturyLink that this Vacation shall not reduce our rights to any other existing easement or rights we have on this site or in the area. This vacation response is submitted WITH THE STIPULATION that if CenturyLink facilities are found and/or damaged within the vacated area as described, the Applicant will bear the cost of relocation and repair of said facilities. If you have any questions or would like to discuss this action further, please contact Matt Reese at matthew.reese(7a lumen.com. Sincerely yours, Mary Hutton Network Infrastructure Services CenturyLink P842575 Exhibit 1 EXHIBIT "A" VICINITY MAP PARCEL #45281.2802 (Exhibit 1 Dedication RSONS By ESE ;TIT Ai VALLEY FOURTH MEMORIAL CHURCH H IA,c C IOOHE 5�-'.ONi PLATTED INTO LOTS; VINO SHOYOI AS M'c CITY OF S?0'KANE VALLEY SHORT PLSEO 10 LOT 1 IN BLOCrt E E1NEW ACRES 3RD ADDITION. ACCORDING 70 PLA RECO,D EO IN VOLUME ,.- PLATS, PAGE 15: B THER 1\I01 LOTS 5, A. THAT PART OF LO N BLOCK 2. OAI1L'NGTON ACRE Hi A• LA THE EAT N 0L BLOCK LOT I. OKAIE COUNTY. -ORDTiHG TO PLAN RE OROEO IN VOLT LN 9 0U PAS, 0 IN SPOKA, ENKE,.._S OT. ADDITION,SGTO DEEDED SOUTH AND SOUTH OF THE SOUTH LINE C. [ GHEI.\ ACRES .:R0 ADDITION: H OF LOTS I, 2, 3, A, 17, 18, 19 AND 20, IN BLOCK 2 OF DARLINGTON ACRE G TO PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME "N" OF PLATS, PAGE 19. LYING SOUTH CF ETNEw ACRES 39D ADDITION. ACCORDING TO PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 9 OF 04474 PAD, PDX E COUNTY. 1IASHINGTON, AND EAST OF THE EAST LINE OF LOT 1 IN BLOCK 6 0. SA'OD CLEO VIEW ES 3N0 ADDITION, EXTENDED SOUTH EXCEPT THE EAST 5 FEET OF LOT I AND 11 5 FEEL AND PORTION OF LOT 20 CONVEYED TO SPOKANE COUNTY FOR UNION ROAD BY DEED RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S TILE NO. 73D7200353: EXCEPT 24TH A,ENVC ANO THE SOUTH 11 FEET OF TMLA WEST A FEET OF LOT B THE SOUTH 12 0 ALL OF LOTS I AND 12; AND THE WEST 69.4 FEET OF LOT 13 ALL IN BLOCK . TO,T ACRE TRACTS ACCORDING TO PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME K' OF PLATS PAC .111 AVENUE: FEET tlF LOTS P AND T; AND THE S0L-I 121 FTT O. LOTS E 1':r.S' ] EXCEPT THE NEST ORA FEET; A 0` LOTS •0 R O CON ACRE TF„�L..•;. C:�IiDING TO PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME �N ALL PLATS, PAGE 19: ALL LYING Y.IT:1 T.IE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY. SPOIL ANE COUNTY. WASHINGTON. IJ 111111111 NTH AVENUE 1 . /JI I■■■ ■■■ I ■I= = ■■EM/. „■■■■■■■,■■■ INE I. MEI II ■ ._— MIN I■ 111 NMI lllllll)l 2 1N AVENUE 1 I ( Vicinity Map 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 f SI-IR-2019-0008 A parcel of land located In the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quater of Section 28, Township 25 North, Range 44 East, Willamette Meridian Spokane Valley, Spokane County, Washington Plat Dedication THE RIGHTS-OF-Lv0T n - '" 1'. iNS t AS SHOWN HEREON AS NAN1 R FACILITIES AND E CORIEN.:TCE_TCOHSTRUCT. T " ARE HEREBY DEDICATED ANS 4101GRANTEDon TO THE COY 0 ' LOUD IT UTHCRIENT AGENTS FOR ROTC U - "!_cl A 1 1. E EASEMENTS GRANTED t'non B ( F LISE OE- t E10 T(5) SHALL 2 SU 0; .lE In AND Iu.LCI -1 ! G,, f.RL.. LG 1' 100 OF THE BORDER E S u_ ITTO AND nR.. SLaJ_..T TO .FPL C:.E_E Y c. LLEY PERMIT PROCESSES 1 < J CH tt00/OR O SIOE1A.LK1vn AREAS LOCATED ':E Esav;OF0v/AAIANO/OR BORDER EASE10 TI A FREE OE MAINTAIN 0 UL - 1' .ERS FAIL TO PROPERTY SA D THE LOI O l'EF(S) Vs- THIS PLAT 511AA'1 BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAIN,. NA RAL OR ),I 1,I AD EIS' -R I-MIURES INCLUC,711, BUT NOT LIMEO:O�I SURFACE TRETAD 0 411711S OR IIAOE4150 OYA1ER R01., AND ALL \WATER OJ :ALES O, "0 ON IHEHR REF:f: GIVE PROPERTIES. At IN THE RIGHTS- Y ABED TO, TO ESP( CIT 0 :'.ESP C SPIP 0 Al, [LEAN, C Ti FAOL1 INCLUDES. BRIS. EDTV ::OT IATI O, 10, REEFING f NOXIOUS VEER, AND US vED DESIGN,E- I AT ION. THEER(S)S FRO.ARE E D O S _D \ECr C: T THE COR 110i0von. DISPOSING. APO IT CrSPOKANE VA l OHMS xEcEssA(0 ARO OTHER L5L :S THE 1.'1CH N. BECOME DUE RFCR SAD IMAtITEN•NCE RESPONSIBILITIES S THE PT THE RESPONSIBILITY AND I RE SPON'SE'L TINSPECT AND/OOKANE VAT TF PO, R AGITAIN THESE FACLITES, NOR DOES THE cm Or sPoKANE Y ACC EP I.:1.Y LInBIU i Y. AND SHALL HAVE NO LIABILITY, FOR : 0 ILLRE BYTHE LOT Ovr.CS(E) TO PROPERLY MAINTAIN THEM, IF THE LOT O11T1ER(S) PAH TO RASTAS !!ESE FACIA TIES THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY MAY ISSUE A N'OTCE 0 UC FAILURE TUT 11NER(5). IF HOT CORRECTED 1.1 MIN THE PERIOD 11,11A1E0 ONSL CH NO ROE. 1F:E C1I YLSHALL HAVE THE RIGHT TO CORRECT THE NSAIN'TE:INICE FAILURE, OR HAVE IT CORRECTED. AT OFTT, EXPENSE THE LOT OWNER( S). T:0 STRUCTURES, NE. DODO HALL DOHS TRL'CT'EA DIRECT, OVER 03 1':1TURAL OR MAN-MADE sTO,RM,iAIER f.,t lul ,n IHTVI ,HRE_S PSI LA CO___:r SI PO CITY OF SPOKANE WARNING: THE. CITY 1, SPOT, ANE vALLE HAS NO RESPONSIBU IY 10 BUIW. INSPECT, 1v'vc- - - �EE DRIVEWAYS, P SI RTA,, ST00NllANN FACLIITTR:L CHANNELS, AND CRH, OST,UV PRONGING C E RD - STORLovA .F 5 (OR OC:TS. PIPES. Y.)P N G.. F 0. H BORDER ED ED TO D_ .AI : THIS PLAT.3 .U95 U E COIL, C BE 155E PIE L 1, of vALLEt' ASSUMES u11 OS. C. PRIVATE 5 - - CITY E n5� AHD THT LINERS HEREBY.L 0., AT THE A 0. ! O L AS NO . SSEvER 0 ESTVOS S OR IN E, SURVEY. , DAL RIVEWAY, REPANY IDNO OR AIR. I:'ERD\[ .: PROVIDE ST CR VORAATEREO. /REIACVAL 0. A -\ THESE AYREEIAEN I5 PRIVADIEsTG ELL ,-SIlVLN ARE! AND DUTIES CORM AVATER ,EJ H - VAIN THE LAND AND SHALL IRE DINO:. HERONANAN S TIIE PARTIES REFERENCED I ERE:. 1,C OWNERS. THEIR HEIRS, SUCCESSORS AT: LI ASSIGNS. IDIND IAL TRACTS SHALL HE SUBJECT 10 PAYMENT OF CURRENT APPLICABLE SETTER D/0R GENERAL FACILITES CHARGES PRIOR To THE ISSUANCE OF A SE,ER SERCCOTORCHARGES J: EC BON PER'.'(T. LADLE FCR THE P_ i AND INDI0OU `L SERVICES 01 ALIT IU LnL u.,_ o. II.,In(DUAL ON -SIZE SE enO= _ 115POSAL SYSTEMS SH/AIL NOT BEE nUTHORIZEDE USE OF PRVATE HELLS AND WATER SYSTEMS IS PRCH1011E0. Acknowledgment ET\TE Or lduhc1 _ ) COLNI,DFkTZTLAnan.; i)S. a 147.11013 33/YcI Auditor's Certificate F'.1E0 FOR RECCRO THIS AY OF .1MINUTES PAST_ CLOCK 'D RECORD D I1. R001: 90000 PLATS i PACE RECORDS DT S:TUR, COUNTY, SHI C OM AT M.( E R 0 EST OF 12 %IRATE, .v1'. VALE YD [ ,FGIRIN CHURCH E COUNTY AUMIOH City of Spokane Valley Community and Public Works Department EXAMINED AND APPROVED THIS 2`etAY or JJL.) . 20i9 DEPU IT! MANAGER City of Spokane Valley Engineering Division E%AL,LINED 1110 M1PPROYEO TRISOAY OF -,LA I y 2019 ceps SENIOR ENGINEER Spokane County Environmental Services Department E0AVINE0 AND APPROVED THIS,uAY 11< vkay 2019 LLFOUR H A Y/BEY t yC1-� R t iCORPDRAnON aCTL LE WIT00112E---EREf ,D.,, . x1 1HI5 J_Z_ _ DAY OF _IVY IN THE YEAR OF 2019, BEFORE 1E, THE UNDERSIGNED, PERSONALLY APPEARED {S11%1oolor _, NNCWRI OR IOENT4F1ED TO ME 0 DE THE MANAGER CR A I/WADER or THE NON -PROM CORPORATION MAT EXECUTED THE INSTRUMENT 01 THE PERSON WHO EXECUTED ME INSTRU0LE TON BEHALF OF SAID LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY ANO ACKNOWLEDGE TO ME MAT SUCH LINED L M., COMPANY EXECUTED ME SAME. NO NO ARV DD FOR THE STATE OE RESIDING AT E IDS JL�2h0 COMMISSION EXPIRES 1z_LITT. DANICASELL OT TIIIIBL%1•WINTEHFI0Nq L 1S5101LNU isos6FS 176.20 La SP0%ANE 0)UNTY FIIVIRUIIIAENTAL SERVICES DIRECTOR Spokane County Assessor EXAMINED //AND APPROVED THI5,eDrAY OFSJk % 2010 ... CK l... ._ c0U1l 10 A55E5509 Spokane County Treasurer I DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT A_, (AXES ,WHICH HAVE BEEN LEVIED AND BECAME CHARGEABLE AGAINST ME LAND SHUNT/ WITHIN MI5 MAP K. DESCRIBED IN THE OEOICAIION OF MIS DATE, HAVE BEEN FULLY PAID, SATISFIED AND DISCHARGED OA1E0 TTSGCo00OFayl 2019 15yT4A0 Surveyor's Certificate THIS MAP CORRECT, REPRESENTS A SURVEY MADE BY NE OR UNDER MY DIRECTION IN CONFORMANCE VAIN REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE AND CITY OF SPOKANE ,ALLEY STANDARDS. NPIMI c 510o_t$WcQ: So2Nu14 Qs Wsl_eY c re.-i FILkTfi Mo. 49 1M' di9 TWO N. MIPRONIE. (205)) 112.6690. 10. HD s.isls FAX.091 N2.0 9 PROTECT NUMBER 3019�DAA Sheet oft Exhibit 1 6826073 58. e 2 of 2 07/26/2019 10.43'23 AM FOUND 3' BRASSCAP 111 MONUMENT I O MENT CASE LINE TABLE LINE BEARING DISTANCE LI 544'43'09T 2163 1.2 509511004E 19.35 L3 S370743"17 24-95 S0I41'20 RADIAL LINE TO CURIE CII l5 S7573.49.o 2/00.00 RADIAL LINE TO CURVE CII 50727'00-E 924.03 RADIAL LINE TO CURVE C7 L7 SO4116'58TE 924.03 RADIAL LINE TO CURVE C7 N447 h Cy O N N • O Co 30.2E RIGHT OF WAY AFTER DEDICATION 31.54 RIGHT OF WAY PER R6 8 9g Eq of 4,72 RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATION N0957'25"E Legend SHP2019-0008 A parcel of land located In the Soulhwosl Quarter of the Northeast Quater of Section 28, Township 25 North, Range 44 East. Willamette Meridian Spokane Valley; Spokane Gounly, Washington 2067,]e EAST 16THAVENUE BRASS C W ASE. � (41(0013 33/6b Auditor Certlflca FILED FOR RECOR THIS a OF 2019. AT 43 1 � O'4,1 70 (0 RECOROE IN BOON OF SHCOUNTY. WTST GjO >T PAC �ST RN2 WN OF SPON O YIA80l_Ql41. a THE RUN OF nz SOR•rcnuc nND vAL4EYnF01B714.HURCHT 596iANL COUNTY AUDITOR ND 3' CAP IN U PERR R 7 21 22 o - CALCULATED POINT (NOTHING Foorvo OR SET) CURVE TABLE • . FOUND 5/8" SMOOTH Roo NM NO IDENTIFICATION CURVE ARC DISTANCE RADIUS CENTRAL ANGLE CHORD BEARING CHORD DISTANCE (UNLESS OTHERI0SE NOTED) C1 31.5 20.0 59147'1444'55'59"V4 28.23 0 =FOUND BRASS CAP (AS NOTED) C2 31.45 20.00 90'05100" 00. N41.03.30"E 29,30 217.56 1652.03 710'00" 25•15CTE 217.41 - = OEED UNE CS 19769 929.93 12110150" 197.32 C5 29,76 70.00 85116'10' S12.3BUY, 27,09 - 0000 31.47 20.00 90'10'02" 2133 07 53.82 924.93 0370'02" OI'C 53.51 ..03,E31.3 P,RoFERTY LINE CB 142.81 924.93 osooNr SS9('11.31 E 162.67 CO 10.07 12.00 9025.0CA '- 16.02 CIO 210.22 .57.03 0710'00' 210.06 x- - ,.000 POAr110 TENSE Il (NON -TANGENT) 2573 20.00 TN1'1,1 F 23.99 $j LOT 1 H 321,804 SQ FT 7.39 ACRES N8233'00E 191.39 B2']5 91. '00''E L CS 58578>0E _„ A 7T IB.47l. S&ST6'10'E7 •� � aLDGK o `E,.. r "4 a 6 S893T03 E 05 JQY'1Q15 h1 5060.30 L 3R �f_oo --_- Sa8570]E I 2139'49'S9'2 s; 9, round Equipment & Procedures 1 2--= 1' REeAR WINO B4. THIS SURVEY WAS PERFORMED v4T1 A TOPCON CPS ILLEGIBLE SYSTEV AND A 3 SECOND TOPCON TOTAL STATION PLASTIC CAP N/000,1TE USING FIELD TRAVERSE PROCEDURES TO ACHIEVE THE MINIMUM CLOSURE STANDARDS PER WAC 332-130-090, WAC 332-130-100, 8/ Ca I 89'S4'45"W 02 15 289154'45F 50.20 IB_LOCI( TEMP. t1X DRAINAGE EASETIENTI PER !NSW 5415490 23 N89 4958RW - EAST24THAVENUE EAST 22ND AVENUE BLOCK 2 LOT 2 356.751 SO FT 8,19 ACRES 2664.49 10 19 RIGHT OF WAY FTER DEDICATION 8P 20 RIGHTCATION DF WAY DEDI Surveyor's Note All CURVES SHOWY HEREON ARE TANGENT UNLESS 1102D ce= oig WENT OF WAY PER R6 F0UN0 3 1/2" BRASS 28 27 4 00 12 O 27 100 200 SCO/B In feet 1 "=100' Record Information RI - PLAT OF DARUYGTO.N ACRE TRACTS. RECORDS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, 00000 WASHINGTON, RECORDED IN BOOK K OF PLATS, PACE 19. R2 - PLAT OF GLEN NEW ACRES, RECORDS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHIIICTON, RECORDED IN 200K 6 OF PLATS, PAGE 50. R3 - PLAT OF GLEN BEVY ACRES 157 ADDITION, RECORDS Q' SPOKANE WNtt, WASHINGT.N. RECORDED IN DOOR 7 OF PLATS. PAGE 42. R4 - PLAT OF GLEN mENv ACRE5 21.0 ADDITION, RECEDES OF SPOKANE COUNTY, W - RECORDED IN BOOK 9 OFPLA1S.Ov 3. RS PLAT OF GLI'.Y Vi COUNTY.. RCCONGT N. ECORD/ COUNTY, VFPLAIS.P RECORDED IN BOOK 9 00 PLATS, PACE 15. 0 R6 - RECORD OF SURVEY, RECORDS OF RECGORGLIn E cSOS/ 55 R7 - Su1+2017 PAGE. 0_. SPC'KA4E C DOR i PLATS, LAE TS,C, .I SR Basis of Bearings WESI LINE - Ri1IEAST 1/0 01 SECTION EP, TO:AN511311 24 NOR.. RANSE 20002'00 IY7.SS407,1 \'.,1 ON RECORDOS SURvEY, RECORDER is RECORDS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, Va. MOIL 1A1,,ER ILL RIVE, SUITE WO • •F 40EUR0 ALENE. IDAHO 9O915 01 I 000) 7724010 NVW2N16URVEYCOM DLY tol9 Shee12 of2 PRa6cT xumaeR xolo.De4 Exhibit Resler "NAL%,. kM i DE ID IC ATION Know AL..8/8,Br TRc56 PZErenrs,rbf/iy//C,Y✓G,pP: ..r'Efns M. Wh/pps hatband and wnf bare ceased /. be plaffed l/e /ofs, b4,Es and s/sae/ /he/.dos sown hereon /. be Ln<,.rl es" aermwew Aec6sV /eo 4ao/r,o.v "dose,bow/or // ws: dey/nn;ngg /o porn/ 25.07 ! e/ so.fh and /9.03 fee / „-u / ,/ Me fey all/can of an/ON Road and 22 ve., /hence JOS•36')4, /y9. 99/ / /o /he heginning /i/ng afa /onyaen/ curve to /Ge r/g ,f /,.',, o rod/us of 2,04/97 feel; /hence.,.,- sale carve wet/er/y 32f. J2 sc�ihra a ce f / rqk a/ 9"2.,; ,Mnc 4,45.r6'A' /5.7.50 Feel; /hence .feofh /4e:2e/ f,• /he xe J B9 •S]E 635. 96 / e (e !hence Norfh /d3. 2; �cl 1. the pain.' eF bey/oirny. They do bench, bed ela P..,ry /ha 1/ e/ .thown Allston pnd/M e/ purposes. A/o /» Man one dethehed d //'' 9 rh nc/nre fs: 941 n,4 p/ 48onany oae 4'4 r.c/ro//oyy 2f de ff/her avOdie dedF, Nx en pares a/ ea//;9 eddil/ono/ /efs orbal.H/o9 soles wi/J of /Minna rep/a, Oo/n s/ ,vale, yr// be ' ewd1 each / / p or/o ,E. Lo/2 B/ k 6 os b,. r4 c it ded/rc fed / spedCe fy es yens,./coon/y peeper!, /a Le lobo..!/ Fee read /r..,4 fw /be rood ron/ ood R//,..:'/i ly.//a//.ny. Paybxx A 6 f n/ s/rip of had as shaven hereon is A/ka/cd A, on earenx0al 1 p 6/.G af'Ffer /yW.T..6r, W 6Q6a8, wc ne✓e h<rean/a ref.:, hand fd/; SW. dy./ BerC2>Aber OA, yi t9i/ C. Wh PPs Edna M. /Mops ACKNOWLEDGMENT STAre OF WASN,N aTon)ss CO2892 Op Spooxn/uc) 0, leas3IA� day of ,0 n L /9G8 before one personally ho. band and wn/a f known / de the ldu./ Mod /ad the .o appeared anforog. 8 /82one' fa/ M Ie/mon 328/ /ns/r✓reenf /o de /heir free and vs/anfary ac/ and deed far the pa pens lheee n on need end a.F.ra..%�yad /N W/TA,SS /)1/46.ef.F, / ba ✓e bereuni se✓ y hand and a/F/See n j 4f%l /Jro "d /be / v r %iY/ above wrv// . h/y 1/an erp; r o !G y l eh be - ` / Sad n a[b c �Yarbi y;. ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATE / ei rene< c s/ i erred e;,./✓ .Eny;�er d Land.�ar� yar eeel/Fy fh.f fbe P'bf rh.,..o bareen ,eo fr..e as y of the o/1,2 / records one edrvey made by /ne .1dn /ha/ /ke i / <arder6 and mena828/84 have bean se/ 4g�C Pro%. f.., sr/ono% E ,/Oells COUNTY OFFICIALS / hereby c er/,fy Ma/ tee reedier' rases oe the heroin p/.Ned lane' Pave been paid /b/r / ''-a dos! a/ 'Drr>.nREO /Sall N ern/v E.Ngqwnen Jp,b6ne Coanly Treasure, By yf a� E.ran nee and appeared ret�d y of Thera -moo 4.18G IJ,,11ln�-Qnsw.. ey T)oi C.. Ar spo44,O coax/y gares/br Do y E nn,/ned and app.owed /48 - bey./ December ,/9t9 r) 1poEone Cean/J, Rood nyinee. E a n dad and .pp,ored /h/s /4'4 do, of R,re/n6e.. /Sall Hurl, K A4.4 s /z /"7v/pu4'r, aasun JpeE.„e Coen Pknainy C noon, a/on C,(aiinere / ) /..mined and Pprored Mid IOW day o/ Oeeeneen owe r /6A�i�lJ.et Spokane Coenfy Conan,frr/ax r ~ehalraa.n E 4/a//ned and epprer.d /his 9 day of J/,kane can/y He.//h 2 par/3,on NtivAb B//Tee - LrEUD • Corn,ra Found Corners sel fora am) Mon. W Set I n Pm) Boundary �(.. !}ES FIR, f /i 013{! / .N :W 4O7' o s 1 ..- :n. L. / R, .alas, �Yt'S`�_.L—mt, _ ._ .ro..e,_ _ axe--s r- _ s eels —"�' ea.le, a .��9 •r i1, 4011410 vet. ?.. u/i' • moo[¢ o /vuyeig� h4r=<-/215* 3 2 / BLOCKQ ;v c.e..an/ 4L./Akt 12/V ACRE 1 / AC eor FINAL PLAT GL ENVIEW ACRES 3rd ADDITION A PLAT OFA PORT/ON OF LOTS /,2,3,4Q5 OF BLOCK OF DARL/NGTON ACRE TRACTS SEC .28 T. 25 N. , R.44 E. , W. M. SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON NOVEMBER /969 CL ARENCE E. S/MPSON SCALE /all SO' PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER LOT I ! f zf Exhibit 2 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING For Street Vacation THE SPOKANE VALLEY COMMUNITY & PUBLIC WORKS IS SENDING THIS NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING TO ALL PROPERTY OWNERS ABUTTING THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY TO BE VACATED BASED ON THE MOST CURRENT RECORDS FROM THE SPOKANE COUNTY ASSESSOR'S OR TREASURER'S OFFICE. Hearing Date, Time, and Location: The required public hearing for Street Vacation Application file no. STV-2023-0001 shall be conducted before the Spokane Valley Planning Commission in such manner as provided by law on Thursday, April 27, 2023 beginning at 6:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as can be heard, in Room 109; Centerplace Regional Event Center; 2426 N Discovery Place, Spokane Valley, WA. Meeting Details: The hearing will be conducted in person, with the option to attend remotely using web and telephone conference tools. Join Zoom meeting by computer, smartphone, or tablet at: A link to the Zoom meeting will be provided on the agenda and posted to the City's webpage: www.spokanevalley.org/planningcommission. Application/Description of Proposal: Request to vacate 6,970-square feet of public right of way in the alignment for Glenview Circle, located south of and adjacent to 22nd Avenue. Applicant: Simpson Engineers, Inc. 909 N Argonne Road, Spokane Valley, WA 99212 Adjacent Property Owner: Oaks Education Association. 2303 S Bowdish Road, Building 3, Spokane Valley, WA 99206 Location of Proposal: The right-of-way to be vacated comprises the fourth leg of the intersection between 22nd Avenue and Glenview Circle, approximately 315-feet east of Sunview Circle; adjacent to parcels 45281.2104 and 45281.2802; further located in the NE quarter of Section 28, Township 25 North, Range 44 East, Willamette Meridian, Spokane Valley, Washington. Environmental Determination: The Planning Division has reviewed the proposal/project and has determined that the project is categorically exempt pursuant to WAC 197-11-800 and City of Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) Title 21 (Environmental Controls) from environmental review under the provisions of the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). Approval Criteria: Chapter 22.140 (Street Vacations) SVMC; Title 21 (Environmental Controls) SVMC; the City of Spokane Valley Street Standards; the Regional Stormwater Manual; and the Spokane Regional Health District regulations. Hearing Process: The Planning Commission will conduct the hearing pursuant to the rules of procedure adopted in Title 18 (Boards and Authorities) SVMC. The Planning Commission holds the public hearing to receive comments and forwards a recommendation to the City Council for an ordinance adoption. The public is encouraged to provide comment in person at the hearing, or to submit written comments prior to the hearing by sending the comments to Levi Basinger, 10210 E Sprague Ave, Spokane Valley, WA 99206, or email to lbasinger@spokanevalley.org. Comments will need to be submitted no later than 4:00 PM on April 27, 2023 in order for them to be received and prepared for submission into the record. Comments received will be entered into the record at the time of the public participation portion of the Public Hearing. Comments received through US Mail will be included if they are received prior to the hearing. All interested persons may testify at the public hearing in person or via the zoom meeting address and/or phone number. Interested persons will need to sign up via ZOOM to speak no later than 4:00 p.m. on April 27, 2023 at the link provided in the agenda posted at the link referenced above. Use the link above to sign up for oral public comments. The link will direct you to directions to sign up for oral public comments. This is not an opportunity for questions or discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes per person. Written comments and documents may only be submitted prior to the hearing. Any appeal Exhibit 2 of the decision will be based on the record established before the Planning Commission, pursuant to Chapter 17.90 (Appeals) SVMC. Staff Report and Inspection of File: A staff report will be available for inspection seven (7) calendar days before the hearing. The staff report and other associated documents may be inspected by searching under "Current Agenda" at this web address: www.spokanevailey.org/planningcommission. if you have any questions, please contact Levi Basinger, Planner, Building & Planning Division, at (509) 720-5332 or lasinger cr spokanevalley.org. h as 801 I 6.�.,tt �3tb.: tretorl.7 24th Avenue 1190] 452B 11(10 r7�pr, 0 5311,04 F. Av�f,�. A1 45284.0402r Unit 4 s2E _116 Right-of-way to be vacated Exhibit 3 Spokane _1+ Va11ey.. Community & Public Works Department 10210 E Sprague Avenue ♦ Spokane Valley WA 99206 Phone: (509) 720-5000 ♦ Fax: (509) 720-5075 ♦ www.spokanevalley.org Memorandum To: Levi Basinger, Planner From: Chad Riggs, Senior Engineer Date: March 1, 2023 Re: STV-2023-0001: Glenview Circle Street Vacation DE Comments Development Engineering requires the following items to be addressed prior to street vacation finalization: General 1) The existing curb returns at Glenview Circle shall be removed and Type `A' curb shall be installed along 22"d Avenue across the vacated portion of Glenview Circle per Standard Plan R-102. 2) The existing driveway approach for 11706 E. 22"d Avenue shall be extended to the required Type 'A' curb and installed per Std. Plan R-1 10. 3) Any unpaved area located north of the required Type 'A' curb within the proposed vacated area shall be paved per Std. Plan R-120. 4) Construction within the public right-of-way shall be performed under the direct supervision of a licensed Washington State Professional Engineer and in accordance with the Spokane Valley Street Standards. All work is subject to inspection by the City of Spokane Valley Development Engineering Construction Inspector. 5) Upon completion of the improvements, a Construction Certification package per SVSS Chapter 9 shall be submitted and approved prior to recording of the Street Vacation Ordinance. 6) A Warrant Surety shall be provided for the public improvements per SVSS Chapter 9. Exhibit 3 From: Giori4 M�n1Z To: Levi Basinger Subject: RE: Street Vacation Glenview Road STV-2023-0001 Date: Wednesday, March 1, 2023 2:58:03 PM Attachments: jmaie001Jng No concerns from me other than what was brought up Chad Riggs From: Shane Arlt <sarlt@spokanevalley.org> Sent: Wednesday, March 1, 2023 2:57 PM To: Aaron Clary <aclary@spokanevalley.org>; Levi Basinger <Ibasinger@spokanevalley.org> Cc: Chaz Bates <cbates@spokanevalley.org>; Gloria Mantz <gmantz@spokanevalley.org>; Ryan Kipp <rkipp@spokanevalley.org>; Chad Riggs <criggs@spokanevalley.org> Subject: RE: Street Vacation Glenview Road STV-2023-0001 Levi, No concerns from Streets. Thank you. Shane From: Aaron Clary <aclaryPspokanevallev.org> Sent: Wednesday, March 1, 2023 1:55 PM To: Levi Basinger <JbasingerCspokanevallev.org> Cc: Chaz Bates <cbates(spokanevalley.org>; Gloria Mantz <gmantz anspokanevalley.org>; Ryan Kipp <rkippl spokanevalleY.org>; Chad Riggs <criggs@spokanevalley.org>; Shane. Arlt <sarltPspokanevalley,org> Subject: RE: Street Vacation Glenview Road STV-2023-0001 Levi, Stormwater has no comments or concerns. Thanks. From: Levi Basinger <Ibasinger(spokanevalley.org> Sent: Wednesday, March 1, 2023 11:15 AM To: Gloria Mantz <gmantzftspokanevalley.org>; Chad Riggs <griggs@saokanevalley.org>; Ryan Kipp <rkikp@spokanevalley org>; Aaron Clary <aclaryispokanevalley.org>; Shane Arlt <sarltPspokaneval ley.org> Cc: Chaz Bates <cbatesCE spokanevalley.org> Subject: Street Vacation Glenview Road STV-2023-0001 To Whom it May Concern: We have received a petition for street vacation (file no. STV-2023-0001) to vacate the portion of Glenview Road right of way south of 22nd Avenue. The portion of right of way in question would be the fourth leg of the intersection between 22nd Avenue and Glenview Circle, east of Bowdish Road Exhibit 3 From: Shane Arlt To: Aaron Clary; Levi Basinaer Cc: Chaz Bates; Gloria Mantz; Ryan Kinn; Chad Riggs Subject: RE: Street Vacation Glenview Road STV-2023-0001 Date: Wednesday, March 1, 2023 2:57:02 PM Attachments: Jmaae001.joq Levi, No concerns from Streets. Thank you. Shane From: Aaron Clary <aclary@spokanevalley.org> Sent: Wednesday, March 1, 2023 1:55 PM To: Levi Basinger <Ibasinger@spokanevalley.org> Cc: Chaz Bates <cbates@spokanevalley.org>; Gloria Mantz <gmantz@spokanevalley.org>; Ryan Kipp <rkipp@spokanevalley.org>; Chad Riggs <criggs@spokanevalley.org>; Shane Arlt <sarlt@spokanevalley.org> Subject: RE: Street Vacation Glenview Road STV-2023-0001 Levi, Stormwater has no comments or concerns. Thanks. From: Levi Basinger <Jbasinger@spokanevallev.org> Sent: Wednesday, March 1, 2023 11:15 AM To: Gloria Mantz <gmantzc spokanevallev.org>; Chad Riggs <criggsPspokanevallev.org>; Ryan Kipp <i kipp(thsookanevalley.org>; Aaron Clary <aclaryftspokanevallev.org>; Shane Arlt <sarItPspokaneval lev.org> Cc: Chaz Bates <cbates@spokanevallev.org> Subject: Street Vacation Glenview Road STV-2023-0001 To Whom it May Concern: We have received a petition for street vacation (file no. STV-2023-0001) to vacate the portion of Glenview Road right of way south of 22nd Avenue. The portion of right of way in question would be the fourth leg of the intersection between 22nd Avenue and Glenview Circle, east of Bowdish Road (see vicinity map). The vacation is adjacent to the site for the Oaks Academy project on 22nd Avenue east of Bowdish Road (BLD-2022-3764 and EGR-2022-0051). I believe the applicant intends to use the area of the proposed vacation for parking and/or access from 22nd Avenue. Both properties that abut the proposed vacation are under the same ownership. The complete street vacation file can be found in the link below or on SmartGov. Exhibit 3 From: Aaron Clary To: Levi Basinger Cc: Chaz Bate.; Gloria Mantz; Rvan KiDD; Chad Rigp,5; Shane Arlt Subject: RE: Street Vacation Glenview Road STV-2023-0001 Date: Wednesday, March 1, 2023 1:55:09 PM Attachments: imane0ol.jpq Levi, Stormwater has no comments or concerns. Thanks. From: Levi Basinger <lbasinger@spokanevalley.org> Sent: Wednesday, March 1, 2023 11:15 AM To: Gloria Maltz <gmantz@spokanevalley.org>; Chad Riggs <criggs@spokanevalley.org>; Ryan Kipp <rkipp@spokanevalley.org>; Aaron Clary <aclary@spokanevalley.org>; Shane Arlt <sarlt@spokanevalley.org> Cc: Chaz Bates <cbates@spokanevalley.org> Subject: Street Vacation Glenview Road STV-2023-0001 To Whom it May Concern: We have received a petition for street vacation (file no. STV-2023-0001) to vacate the portion of Glenview Road right of way south of 22nd Avenue. The portion of right of way in question would be the fourth leg of the intersection between 22nd Avenue and Glenview Circle, east of Bowdish Road (see vicinity map). The vacation is adjacent to the site for the Oaks Academy project on 22nd Avenue east of Bowdish Road (BLD-2022-3764 and EGR-2022-0051). I believe the applicant intends to use the area of the proposed vacation for parking and/or access from 22nd Avenue. Both properties that abut the proposed vacation are under the same ownership. The complete street vacation file can be found in the link below or on SmartGov. P:\Community Development\1 CD Projects\2023 CD Projects\STV\STV-2023-00011Aoplication Are there any concerns from DE, Public Works, Streets, and Stormwater regarding the proposed right way vacation? Please send your comments to me by next Wednesday, March S. Thank you, Levi Basinger 1 Planner 10210 E. Sprague Avenue I Spokane Valley, WA 99206 (509) 720-5332 I ibasinger@sookanevallev.org Exhibit 3 From: Ryan Kind To: Chad Rigas; Levi Basinger; Gloria Manly; Aaron Clary; Shane Arlt Cc: Chat Bates; Jerremv Clark Subject: RE: Street Vacation Glenview Road STV-2023-0001 Date: Wednesday, March 1, 2023 11:52:49 AM Attachments: jmaae001 eng jmaae002 eg Levi, Traffic doesn't have any additional comments to add. Thanks, Ryan Kipp, PE, PTOE I Engineer: Traffic 10210 E. Sprague Avenue I Spokane Valley, WA 99206 (509) 720-5016 I rkiparspokanevallev.org From: Chad Riggs <criggs@spokanevalley.org> Sent: Wednesday, March 1, 2023 11:48 AM To: Levi Basinger <Ibasinger@spokanevalley.org>; Gloria Mantz <gmantz@spokanevalley.org>; Ryan Kipp <rkipp@spokanevalley.org>; Aaron Clary <aclary@spokanevalley.org>; Shane Arlt <sarlt@spokanevalley.org> Cc: Chaz Bates <cbates@spokanevalley.org> Subject: RE: Street Vacation Glenview Road STV-2023-0001 Levi, Please see the attached DE comments for STV-2023-0001. Thank you, Chad Riggs, P.E. I Senior Engineer 10210 E. Sprague Avenue I Spokane Valley, WA 99206 (509) 720-5033 I criggs(3spokanevalley.org This email and any attachments may be subject to disclosure pursuant to Washington State's Public Record Act, Chapter 42.56 RCW. From: Levi Basinger <lbasingerca spokanevallev.org> March 16, 2023 Levi Basinger City of Spokane Valley 10210 E. Sprague Avenue Spokane Valley, WA 99206 Pursuing Excellence FRANK Soto JR, FIRE CHIEF 2120 N. Wilbur Spokane Valley, WA 99206 (509) 928-1700 Main (509) 892-4125 Fax spokaneval leyfi re.com RE: STV-2023-0001 Street Vacation Vacation of 6,970sq.ft. of public ROW at intersection of 22nd Ave and Glenview Cir. RE: Technical Review Comments The Spokane Valley Fire Department has completed a review for the above referenced project and takes no exception to the "Street Vacation" as proposed. 1. Only for the matter of awareness, there are improvements being made to parcel 45281.2802 (11711 E 24(,, Ave) that is immediately SW of the intersection of 22nd Ave and Glenview Cr. Improvements are being made as part of EGR-2022-0051. If there are any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, ttilaaat 'Monde Austin Morrell Fire Protection Engineer (EIT) Spokane Valley Fire Department Exhibit 4 To Ibasinger@spokanevalley,org From: Andrew Cripps Date: 3/16/2023 Subject: STV-2023-0001 Project Name: Stage: Vacation of ROW/Street Description: Vacate right of way south and adjacent to 22nd st. Site Address: 11711 East 24th Avenue The Spokane County Public Works Wastewater FA01 System Division has no objection to the finalization of the above mentioned project. If your project requires a sewer plan submittal, please refer to the requirements here: Development Plan Review Checklist Additional General Commercial Sewer information can be found here: • General Commercial Sewer Info I Water Usage Estimate Form Sewer Planning and Design webpage • Sewer Planning & Design Exhibit 4 Levi Basinger From: Stoddard, Karen <Karen.Stoddard@lumen.com> Sent: Friday, March 17, 2023 3:03 PM To: Levi Basinger Subject: RE: STV-2023-0001 Agency Review Routing [EXTERNAL] This email originated outside the City of Spokane Valley. Always use caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Levi, The only conflict Lumen has would be a buried copper cable we have that runs along the south side of the vacation area. Please see picture below. The buried copper cable is the blue line circled in red. Lumen would like to retain the utility easement rights. These rights should provide for maintenance, construction and reconstruction as needed. Thanks, Karen 1 Exhibit 4 LUMEN' Karen Stoddard Capacity Provisioning Specialist 1020 E Cataldo Ave, Spokane, WA 99202 tel: 509-666-8534 Karen.Stoddard(Iumen.com From: Levi Basinger <Ibasinger@spokanevalley.org> Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2023 2:02 PM To: Bill Helbig <bhelbig@spokanevalley.org>; Chad Phillips <cphillips@spokanevalley.org>; Jerremy Clark <jclark@spokanevalley.org>; Shane Arlt <sarlt@spokanevalley.org>; Chad Riggs <criggs@spokanevaliey.org>; Austin Morrell <MorrellA@SpokaneValleyFire.com>; Traci (HarveyT@SpokaneValleyFire.com) <HarveyT@spokanevalleyfire.com>; Spokane County Public Works - Wastewater Division <planningactions@spokanecounty.org>; Paul Savage <psavage@srhd.org>; Jason Beesley {jbeesley@ modernelectricwater.com) <jbeesley@modernelectricwater.com>; Modern Electric Water Co. <transmittals@mewco.com>; engin_ataman@comcast.com; Stoddard, Karen <Karen.Stoddard@lumen.com> Subject: STV-2023-0001 Agency Review Routing All, Please review the attached application material for a proposed street vacation (file no. STV-2023-0001) of a 6,970- square foot piece of right of way adjacent to the intersection of 22'd Avenue and Glenview Circle. Submit your written comments that include any conditions or easements required to preserve utilities or access. COMMENT PERIOD ENDS: Wednesday, March 29, 2023 @ 5:00 p.m. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Levi Basinger i Planner 10210 E. Sprague Avenue I Spokane Valley, WA 99206 (509) 720-5332 1 Ibasinger@sookanevalley.org *Morns This email and any attachments may be subject to disclosure pursuant to Washington State's Public Record Act, chapter 42.56 RCW. This communication is the property of Lumen Technologies and may contain confidential or privileged information. Unauthorized use of this communication is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the communication and any attachments. 2 Exhibit 5 VACATION APPLICATION 22.1411 dor* Va 1 ley f 1 i ^., I ' (-: LiVIED ! ir,, 14"! F Ilir,..74.1c 5TO F USL OfL.X Datr Submitted PLUS 0; _ ru: {11, el_1,1:.:1;:t by • PART I — REQUIRE I) MATERIAL Appor,,c:.1,:,11 u A.7..7.r pit 1: 1.1E PQV4RI1 mAlf-tRIALS Aflt NOSI PRIONVf1)** I Complvic..1 A .11:cation Form I Application I PE PASD TOO OfAL2 gr30111:11741. al Notice of Arm; : .1-i Packet I 17.1113.11101 — Adjacent Prop-trty(li...) ,atrtI 1 r,riI, I. .1 slfr Aticto, the • , , ; . : ,.; so WIttlyen Connoteportdence, from UI1I1# Ponroyorti. u,.bert r-!• ,•? Dv:11ml • .• 61I .1) Vi ;y Map - , • • 14....1•0(41 of Stave'? !. ; , 1:11 ;AL 1 .1 ei Vire:ten ivtirit il i cir.po !.. .1 :t•:. or it, rvat L it.43 str,„2:ct ,t I .1' PART II— APPLICATION INFORMATION Aor, NAL, SnsuriLngineers Inc. Nick Mc(.ill) ; ArgOline lid. ci„ Spokane Valley ro,„0, (5.11FI)926- I 322. FAx C! I If. Oaks Eclue.ation Association pitotmi, 1,, .99212 r .0GgligesiertPlonimpoliert 23.13 S [Thr..)Wili.,F):1 Coi; ^c•-)P(kall1) Valley u kikiA STATE: " r't 1,199206 PLispe I 01 Exhibit 5 ine 4000 , ec, 2 !..--.1110.11i-t1 LIC A1 /IJN E- 22nd Avc Sbok:AwViIy Correction: Mrs Vigue died January 22,2023. Property was sold to Oaks Education Association December 7, 2022. z 99206 IPOMP, y r i r ylk k•'•"riuros•- w Is.;(1 v, 1 IT 11,(s.,:sNi2s) X 1:10 P 1 ...",;.DE-) sL„scsits.T r,css C t.,scss s t '6(.0 14-741' to, • ,s„.;4414-* (--"erinti—Ame. 114-11 E 214 441 Aye_ ti I , P P . Pt, P le 01 t. t.t ott • tt IA% I 1;. ; ;0 ;At 14PN4i 'tt -A 71; 4, t. e •.„4, tt 11 F e .1 de It I l ' „.; ; 7•;• 'P; " .11i11'. 1•I.,14;;;" .4.1•Pyl 'I/ 1' •1,._ 141r 1.1 ; s 1!" 1;•1';';'• ;.•;. 11 „ rsss t.• ,rs. t Ts Ito, ; It ; .• . T;^ ; • r'. :It, r! ttt t : ,1141; VAr.7.4%1i4:4°11 ".1'PLII.A;1111:4.1 Exhibit 5 F. por: AI :I:v.45M .11 111 .1 !I 11 "14 14:414.0.1';45F (Am:A."4 444,4t. kr-,1.44f r '1 ti* • ',I !.'„,• A ' I II „/- -4. 3 4. NOTARY ST-Aii WASHINGTOX, ••,- .1'1 7. or SPOKANE I f h .1 I ! E. SWOPOsi to t.4 rty t`' ° 441 by' (.0oory s 5 -I I for I, sr I , Prit.On.;.tir R.". .1 , • I1 4WPNI Hi NO. 1 AUTFOTION: roM. OWNER ND, 2 AUTHOR PAT ION 'II '1111111 ID 11.4m/ peopr rty e:4-1 -mirth), 1: .1" .1 I h atiers Exhibit 5 !"-.11,ornitt. Nit IIvv ! ;II to leryesont ma arj fr.? vebelevx Li a cc Exhibit 5 this ''street leg" has not been used for any part of traffic tile last 30 years. Consider llne#4, with possible parking lot this would create more traffic, creating a flow of traffic from any parking lot entrance/exit. A PENDIX 'I .1 VAI. rtrj E 11tEt /ALLY IMPROVE SERVICE I() ILt :III;11 .1 THE VACAIION OF THIS STRET LEG WILL REDUCE PUBLIC RISK BY TRANSFORMING A 41-16VAY INTER5CUN IN TO P4, 3-WAY INTERSECTION. 2 Pl. IN; ',Hai TOR AA rt• 1.1),tr;!H I.:I Or HIM) 10E-1 VIJE31.q.. USE Of PI !HOC ACCESS? LxiitAIN a NO, THIS STREET LEG `,.( I;; 10..1 n R HAS POTENTIAL TO SERVE, THE PUBLIC AS PUBLIC AO. ...°1 • • •,,NtJ(r DIU RLN i 1 id IT- C; TER 1111 1x,Ili..411 :1. rIc.. ti (.t.)1•11•11. NIT NEIGHBORHOOD IS ADEQUATELY SERVED OVINE REMAINING WAS 1.10./°," ° I i; i#11$ RIGHT -OP -WAY IRE Arrfc— ,1,11,,ni.F. a. fkirtglii, AND CURRTN I , DEVELOPMENT OF THE 11- MY I i 1-,SEN 1HE "' InCESSITYrOli II I!S RIGHT .;.^,1 AND I AND WOJ, i .E. BT I TER SFRVII) AS A POR111)14, I .,!F 1.00, ()EVE' !..11N7 FOR PARKING OksIi UPI N SPALF ;; !, Hi! IIT•;11 !:+J•H iir111 Vri• °•.°11'r1141'11°IIIII'•,' I 1:1 r°, ° I1 1',1 °•:°•. '.1r1 11 1111 ,).YI AI EXIS LING UNDER GROUrr )AH11 OVERHEAD DIVTIES SIMI I BF ,AINTH HIE F(11WWING UTILITY COMPANIES SERVE THIS Ank • MODERN ELECTRIC WATER COMPANY (WATERtio • AVISTA [GAS) • SPOKANE COUNTY WASTEWATER SYSTEM DIVISION SEWER) • CENTURY LINK • COMCAST parking. and open space two really different outcomes. parldng= more neighborhood traffic/drainage, open space- ? Open Space is land that is not intensively developed for residential, commercial, industrial or institutional use. 01,./T n VA 1,1 I LIDF IIMWATTR npAiNinGt r'AC IP; °. 'I rlf NO S1ORMWATER DHA/NAGF VA(.11 °MS PRESLN1 Exhibit 5 1.11' 11 • Project Narrative 11.m '• • -1.1 t si• I. .1 1, 9: •11 ;•4 rivieu litaki lying ',HI': 1.• ; .1 I 1;:. ; • 1. I • I 1 • .%". -• k 1.1;kiIditii • ' lid II 11111 1.1! 5 .11 11_ ..1 I. 1. . I .•. psiticd IS I J-21)22-1142 , ;;;.•,; . 1:.1. t tire fp .1 lk.t..01 1 0411li "Is 111 I ' ,It"i'. .1 1,14 , 4111 .1,1[i N.& t lequilkt;1;:;;.,-..le p, molt u t: ,t 00... l 1, .1111 11.,ttiel 1.; :lotc,r.. a' st d, 011 ;t1„, Arenue and adAttli: ., ;I porn, ;:t tlIlI No existing tots take .:„:;:css I root, irv. Road. flios docent progero ; a .1 14 ft`a iS served Its ,.1,-;letat 1..kctra: I. t .11, 11 +I -HILL" (sewer t Sr. IR" V.1110, I. it s: 1p.ittir.virt rc). r1. ; ,o• I t .11,1. t 1s per t.)1:42-Vieti Jc4.n iri1 nuIiii requeS1 All s 0,1 r IcnI land is 4 loped Ni,Lit: le-foor III) 111.0-rsTc arp!icant fools thb projce1 is in cciii.pltdil,c with the ariph,stle tit the Npf-.4." Atte 'Valley Mum. ipal Code end other applkable rexttli ts-oli RAW - RECEIVED FEB 1 0 2D23 COSV PERMIT CENTER SUB # REV. # 9 i!q!gxA Exhibit Exhibit 5 Val ley 1'1.6641 Nuirthei. .11 Ds...(:11111;4r: ( 10.:1;•1 1)..1.;. III ..5111.11.....T,i•11; 1:1 11....1)1,111•1.1 li1i11111./134 1t 1ml:ter i*oNI\111`.:11‘ 1110 INI).141.,•.111% :1%13 E lir. q i)i' ERN1INATi()Nt (fil «01111 I I I VI. RI VII )1, S 14 202,1 III tfttiii t I 111. 1.; a.1' •, II ICCT ':•••• ,. I.:. 11.1 I,.. IC 11111LT 1 11'11..1 ,1 V;11 ';11.• 1 I.111, •«. 14'..1';111 I .11 ; I II t ...I, I., . lot , • ,,.. 1,.; : • 1 , . • '10 tttoaki , ▪ o• aft •I". I .' ,.•1 I+ • I t ; I 1111 It.. II • '"; ; • I • • I, '51)1 It 194 I( 1111)1 •01,11',11‘.. . • ; :: • •1 t III._ I • I • ! I .: • I... I 1.1. I.1..I 1.11,1. 1..1 1i* , •: 1.i. • • I / I , .1 • I'll .1";11 itt. II .1 1111' I I..., I , it I,• in:, I ,•.I ..1",..11 I, 1...: .1 .1 •. 1,:.••• I .1. ":1,..• 11111I4 tI. t" • It r, :•.,, ,, 1 1 T I :1,11 1,1 ,:1•1•,1 ..; "I 011 r I .. III 17111'..1 Ill • 1 I•: I.. t • 1•I• ..I • . I ,t 1;;:t 1 II: ..1 I •; 1 r "••• t'11 . I i.11 'I ; r 1 ••• 1 • .1 ;I .; , • ; ", . • I • .1 • I I , I I I .1 CI. III •.1•• I •• I •: ; I • .1 it. ; „. .1 1:.",,:„:1 II,' I i)Ar. • Exhibit 5 j Sp6kni ....00"kii I ley 1111 rstr. 6IIIi.JIILI1lI ^, I ",1 • o: 4rni [ itiontipiiiiilt1111111111: r'IT'Ittrc tie25-11.141' F.J.."'i. IC tit STATI II: ViA4.* 1,7.TO% DIAN,X.A. ti HC41100i i 1 ' Oli 1411YCOMIA.4:= .IL a.E.141111111111111M'a1 MI111111/48 • I 1":1*.''. .1'. C.1 fir I . :r 1.11 • .1.....1 11 ' .211, Ito! . ' .1 II 1 11. tilt 1 1 • 1 ii - I . .1. SI 1'1 A. • Exhibit 5 irf, 1•1 I 11, t r. 1111 , .1 'r .1, M111,11'1.10 i.i .1 1 lir, AI ..1111111,..rt ; :I • • 1.• trir, tr 1•• 1'011 .luI rl 1141 .irtri•4tl N< II I I( 11t 11:.1 ft4 1( lit • 141Nij 1, A • IA IA tuu11 1, 1.• •..11 ,.,, I , .,„ , I, • • , .' • i 11 +111,111 1 ' r I '• I rt tictirct 4•••• )1-41, e. 114' • 1,, 1, ', . 11 1. .,•., : 1 • „. ,.. • Asio111.;8,111......t.Clicocr•p1,,,t1 1‘'• I dr11,111Cor t,f,r1,C • • • !NIITIV,4,141 a Cll. Wry ,.• . f A•fla,,frol ritirpritr'4' Otntett•,, 1,41,,1.4•4 4r .• It . ',• • tl••.. ' •,; 1.. ••• t,r134,4,4•441: 1tv tri,,-1.4,4441•%44). 44 4; , • • r. • •1„ • • 4 th. ,• • 1.. r th,..r.ltr$,IVS34/4/1( 313 fret r ' „ rr"•11 . 1 1,..71•11 , , ..1 ! .1/10,a,r141 ,r1 • 11, 1 ,, 1. V. 11, 1. 1..„l ▪ " t ••' 1 •, 1 ". ' ,r • , '1. 11 91141 +11 •••,t1. 4.4.4 tr,r. 1 I. • .1411.11011.1.1•1" Pi r • ii• 1114— •,•• t •••11x,rt StItkt II 1111141-rowo, tt. •4tftr• ' 1 ' '• I 1147r 1 1,-r#1,,ir, 474 J. , 1r. ra.','t.• crtr "•t; 'A .0 rf thrrrr -I •I 11, •Ar": IrP:7,1"'•• r • 4 . 1 . 1f477 41,4. 4. 4%4 11 r trt • 4* • -1 ;, ; • .4,•...t••••,-; t.141.44r4•4 • ..1 IA, AC: 11•',•,4 1.,,,ertord r,;.‘..11tr1.1 +.111 r It& *cern rtm irr'' 1.1 •• 11 • ,,,r• r•riot11,1,1,11 '1. • , I .1 • • 1 r ; ,,,11 I 11 • 1,11,o . 11'111 • ,,- •1 Exhibit 5 r Ida so 400.0 011F ValIcy NI III/ NN'1'1 ril: SN-N1i 1.• * Appitaant ocorripiata and skin lig-lora m Notaty and tato in to tiro PairnIt Cantor. •: 11 •110., L LI !•,!,'• ••• 'd ;II L. ,on 5 • io• ir , (4- .t 31,4 sv.ory, deroscs !tad ol, '01.,.• • .• .•1 I i1 111(.Y o 1,10110 SiaRcsQf '101 •k 11,111 it- I .1, • 11 I ' • ,•-1.11 t•.1% t 1 ,,,, I t I ••••• 11, 1 - I ! \111 17.81) i'Crrnit • 1, • • ,• 13, al 1,, 11:,• ,r'ii,1•,.••I CVtXC 1, hrI: RSCIS 140TAg1 PJE:.10 0191323 STATE OF WAS1iNGT014 rA,41SSION EXPRES APRIL 9, 2025 I • ,11411llyggen ic Ala Oi A ri .11 I 1 •I t' I tU • • I ,11,10 xi I Paw I • Exhibit 5 ILrae,ni11,41,-, 1 ,,r11 "f•1„re. 5,,111.r.1.,11, 4n1r1 I I'lu§.,"S° • , , ., I ' 1 1 i, 11 • , .. 1 " Ile+ul r-.it" ., I'u'',11, 'Wlarr.+llapr<t[r^rIG'n1 I' I,. L,I• N111 I('1: [)1.' III rrr.rl I I ILiliN,c: I ul `[e„ 1 ,4clt[nu1 1 .11 NI .1-. ','•I 1'^6' 1'r I. 1>',41d ',ll', IN 1'I It A1,C-1.�1, � "•II1 IISI'•+ I` I +�. 11I 1: 111 l I"I. 11.51 c ., Ih1 , ,,I , s I111 .Il\I:f la l4 wl 1 ,.I ,i. 0l1 I, . . ,•n ,III I �h , FI'+ II 6I If 41 Il � •` V.f'!SI IIII i"1 ,. 4�1 ('I .I , , ,.• I '1 ,. 1:: �,4I 11 1 .: , , . , I I I , , h 1 ,, . '• 1 . 1 . . -Ili f1, r. Il I t .1.. .1 � ilarrfll 1'ee,l1:Pe 01, 11 f: ..1 , _. , 11 ti'L, r 1,1, m.11'r, I 491,1^ 1,1 • . ,. , e .' ' t, i •'1. ..I 1:,i r.11 15.:;4 I: - ir, .. ,l . 11 I' —. 1 'W LIr 1 :.. %''1,.4 VI, ,1 1 .Ina N, , I , r . .; t1,l,nnall rir rr l,r: r 'i ,_,i':.I ., , ::I4'4I44 �',, ,h.r7 <, •,'""!"l< i , 14 11'; .,14 1, _'CI "tee , .s1 le.."". , I'4 '' + I It,: 1' :x`rur..r C11 axe : r3,r.ta-, -. I; Jet, a' 14' L, 1, ,.mot, ,'1"u,.rl" :'_.[,,rr...a' A! :1, 411. 41 Exhibit 5 I Cr i I I TITLE COMPANY CERTIFICATION AND APPLICANT CERTIFICATION TITLLA X_Itsi_PAN.YC1;:.Ii,TL LAT1QN 1 do hereby certify that the following li'.' ' .! 11; I,"I's anti addresses, consisting of the attached pages, has been prepared It • . I 11. ., County Assetsar`s or Treasurer's most current computer ir, „Li^.. 1 .':r 1I I ! .t of my knowledge correct, and is current within dirty (M) Liars rll r 1 also certify f have provided to 11 !'_111 iI.,"t , it +�'•'..ik14r, what the owner is lined as a frliance company, 1.01 I' roll t [ I•:+1.f,. VI 1'i :,:(11.'t•.II ISf,L Lt1,'.JL,lI.Y t •.•Ifl'+rt1 (foie Cot1111,1.y Date.: ante: I :1 211 , p I I I I t `,1, N`f_(: I' l ATIIM I rlrr II' •II;r 11- I'I' III:' JI!Irl i'1!'r.1,1(chei(io ,'Ft I". II. .'.III" 9I1 -.1; 1''. •I I1:-I 111i Iltdt 11 li '!I �d'• 1 I''•) III' i ll4t'[ NI11'111 'il."u y. I r '., {I ;ilfr, l; •1 ..1 Gt.1 .II. ,•'Il .I IIlr" r •+' (II- lit �,l r..••��d., :LI�.IlllaIl� Ila 1 l..,l h.r.,,.l ..r sl .,^ .' ', •1I 1 1: • A Exhibit 5 1L proposed limited Fire lane access with pate/chain ..� didi- --- TE EXTG BLDG E GLENVIEW CIR T NEW SIDEWALK, PER MI l 5 NEW' C URB CUT/ APP OACH if -I:, 3 � I\ PER CNIL L NEW WATER/ SPRINKLER UNE,S) (APPROX. LOCATION SHWA From site plan BLD-2022-1142 Site Plan. I.5,) existing gravel overflow parking jcrr�r ETC BIJ)G EXTG BLDG NIW 'SPIER LINES) PER CIVL/ MEP (APPROX. LOCATION 5410'k+ t,) ;II I'II'Tr'1 tC' 11f11;=IF1 r+1I 111, Lr1r,. From site plan BLIP-2'O22-1 1 42_Site_Plan KEYNOTE LEGE\ PUBLIC R.OW_ PARCE I.: TO BE DEDICATED TO LOT 2 IN FUTURE (SHOWN HATCHED, NOTED FOR REFERENCE ONLY, NO WORK IS PROPOSED WITHIN THE SCOPE OF THE CURRENT PERMIT APPLICATION) EXISTING GRASS, PER LANDSCAPE 6' H. CONSTRUCTION FENCE W/ SIGHT -OBSCURING FABRIC; SHALL CONFIRM TO ALL CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY STANDARDS; FENCING SHALL BE LIMITED TO THE SUBJECT PROPERTY; APPROXIMATE LOCATION SHOWN, EXACT LOCATION AND ENTRY POINTS TO BE VERIFIED PER FIELD CONDITIONS W/ OWNER APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION (APPROX. 2,0 1 LF) CITY OF SPORE VALLEY FIRE DEPT. ACCESS ROUTE (SHOWN DASHED); SHALL BE MIN_ 26' CLEAR WIDTH, IN UNLIMITED CLEAR HEIGHT (Gk. TO COORDINATE WI CIVIL, ETC); (SHALL SUPPORT A 75,000 LB. FIRE APPARATUS, PER (IVIL.) NEW GRASS, PER LANDSCAPE IN COORDINATION W/ OWNER WITHIN CONSTRUCTION FENCING, EXACT SCOPE T.B.D. IN FIELD NEW VAULT, W/ FDC & PIU PER CIVIL CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY FIRE ACCESS LANE, PER CIVIL B. NEW SHRUB AND/OR MISC_ PANTING/ LANDSCAPING, PER LANDSCAPE, TYP. NEW TREE, PER LANDSCAPE, TYP. REFER IOSURVEY (OR MORE IW O., IRON( INFO. PER SURVEY G9.5 NEIGHBORING PROPERTY (NOWORIO LOT 1 1 9MRL5 RAUL 90.9522I 1 O,YIEPALLEI 9IIIM0.102ALCNEP(H SUBJECT PROPERTY: LOT2 1.192292 PAB0LN0.4128I2032 g5'Nf9.INE0USNADIMA LOT INFO. SCALE: NOT T05CALE SITE ANALYSIS COPE REFEREKES wrEAxARONALOUILOINxCOCA W MYHANRwMNSTALENI£mMENIc SPORAREVALLET MUNICIPAL CODE PARCEL /82111.1802 EGAL MAT N.P.K1101,51,81,PTY IA'xeeam.) ACREADE SINS,; FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SLEURBANIR.3 LOT COVERAGE ELEILLAOLLO FRONT AND STREET 15 REAR EIDE SIP PUB. Hi PARKING ANALYSIS CODE R AIaIIKEHNLONAL LIKILIMGANL CIO,. IAE xMMM�.9,511 PRroNRPROP ssNOFRLQAMNShA2IUA SPOIOOM VALLEY MUNICIPAL ,ON, •-,M1 IC TABLE 50, REQUIRED RAMING BMOC MOM YOU TABLE TOIL SILL:CIRO USES cumlitenmenS IMO DEGREE MARMON ANN,- MM A MIN Sin.l I:Ou rtDEIw AYQRNEAlSLE NM TO Vmc §xx.SOQm cITIVHOsPU La .4 DEcACME,.•NP E. NEEOE _ MOON FRACTION -MEREST FON EVERY D WC TABLE 22.10-0 REQUIRED 1111,11 STAG ELL SCHOOL- OTAL RUILLVLA RUILOVIG ILL SCHOOL EDI. GILD CATIC TIO 'lost 6 LOT 1115 .81.01 6.0.17 SYMC FACTOR FO 6 FACTOR 1 PER 600 CAS 16 11 ILL r.TS: PAC SAG SEE PARILLMO ANALTSIS,71113 PAGE ACM OFFICES VALLEY Ali TANCLUART MLA R,oFFtES ADM GPM. CLASSROOMS cLASS "s71/ rrii iIIIsAacov ov ixE oo SlOiiE was %4 HW LOT ro clry EFeRTDPARICINGAM NEUVERING AGREEMENT EFSPgUNEVALLEY wr rnrzz9 Fore larsc INFc al TcrnLvaxrc xO sracE iQ1AL PftOVIOEpPMKNGs (EXISTING PAR ) TOTAL REQUIRED PARINGS > 0 xOTTIDI�v 01 AccEssa - -t.2"h G2 _�.. .. �,, ,. •..,. �. ...,• is MA .9s NSA r91 % -- „9 .=5 cu< O KEYNOTE LEGEND OOY. PAUL 102E210104E0 WlOR 91NIUAE1SHalll W1EUEBtt0 90I0RAf1EAIIF,IONIY11002IKISIOININIHE P90I95E0SCOPE f MUAAE!1TPERNW9PRU2091) m.1H64MOs,vmuIIr.EUE 1 s 25061R211011.10496162133253211216729WC: 2101,0Nn91e10A1LCII90F590,21 22L9121R10AA0Y I1651WL 2I120119310IRE SUNECI ROOK APPA0p0N1El0GII0NLI201.UA'1t0UB011ANOPPRI P)IIBSIOBE YE917190 PEA AfLO 20,0 0115W/MMR APPAPPI 22102 TO 312121,1101pPPROKZW910 PP OF S10IIIIALPHA OINK. RW IEISHOIrt 0ASRB19: 51WI BEK&ZP CIEUL'IIOIµ 0li MILTS IIEO ASSIGNS ILr, 10C00A01'Mlf we cr. OMMOViPORTA MOO) rIRE 9. CIIYOESPOPAIEVALIEY 29E225E529229. PEAWAI B. NEW522BAPNDIDA91155EMT. MNBSWNIIIRPEPINDSLAPI.PA. 9. 010001lM00muAPE IN pS 101110PVA1c SBEAR Lr BISSIGROARG EXISTING PARKING IOW MS SM(EY 9, f((ISSMA10Ei IZ EAYKffSSINEVIM I GORKI IINL OP J EXTO ELM EPISLN(. 551IN6(OIa) AVS9PoEVMFS. MASON STROLLS V NMS,REY%O: A. IL AB CIRIAGROKS,, PRIM I8195I0EYI801818088 E 24TH AVE GORAAU1., 08.03.32 BIIIINGSIIS•INII TP. UNPIN PINRAAU•IE OP. PISIDI6IIRE 12109A117 EAiIIIO4'IAIISIWIIPIRISL� EXTG BLDG ERN 5W111511EAAWIIKIKKLf PAOPERA UNE PK N15IINl1I9I92WTI P22L921 B\TOBILO ECIO BLOC enD Xs I eLW I w w alfx NRN - —� Pffl(N l4Y NIWSNINIAlK f4ACm1 O rN0'INA AB 9AGAOKS 1Prnm JIB �HE4'I WAIFG SPSNpIA LI NE1S1 P5A Cm7 M0 PMl5I0Gfl015H0Yn0 SEGGIR A0M5A3ERWNIE TO5919N0AWN1 7 J TIP.-rIL 1 LEvi8821810 Mark it. *"sr.Irltn SNIPING RACIAL AK7 ERGB100 BICYCLE RACK SPECIFICATIONS s n.-ul I IE ,N L 11,11 I .s<IriOIEDEOOM- p aNIIIIM IDMIIHIONIMMOOMMEMOAKMMRDd1,ME.OMM1DMNDIxEGM'IxEM A [-R\3081110 E.CIOBUN E 22ND AVE EWER MN, NEP D,N;ND�SHonM --7PEwNWIEre. LIMVIS AY PRIMES UIINSI PM CA8M1IEPIAPVA%A. LOIAn0N5HOI121 fllElfl(If 50113 SEE SPKIHG110M1S, INSSNf(I PROPOSED NGEWESCHOOL B oILDING SEE PM!RE. IX911222O212E(0192I992II01,129.. flC. ROMAIINE AP. E\I0BEIN L LN0BNLSIOE1?A1A AP ERG BLDG 1 BEWa0ecur IIIRx2202219R.PEA ELINIk fAP AOAIO(AIION SHOIMI 0 '�mi nrNG R Nl, REQRuIS Ri010 Ar,<E ary `mAOOIBunREIox slmn 1NII CN5VO1NEAGR0011DEtEC1ANAI OWE. GINIEUR10.t WPM NGITNII SWAPO 2232E2112NE. 35- I2'199132EI500l 1.02102211131122222 s'BISIp529322(A�I O PRO910EIVIOSACEONIOIERSBN RAOElA1ll.Spl %IF lOG'ION 5ND'IAI, VEAIfl IY101111EA#A SIZE mxomoxsEi E\ G 8100 LASING REMNANT BISOIGWAIEe EPP(AL1 20221711.1119,WP (53si06222 wM AP. MINING EMBUS EMBUS AUGL5113,2322 to cts V 773 eN V9 co ^O W r P:D10(1 No.: 5799 Desigre.dl; BJ: U : Millet Melge fT 07.132022 Phase: Bid581 928I910NNoI PEWIT 0B.0320211e13:30p51 GIaW rgilll SITE PLAN CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: May 30, 2023 Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ information ❑ admin. report Department Director Approval: ® new business ❑ public hearing ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Motion Consideration — Bid Award for Broadway and Park Intersection Project #0347. GOVERNING LEGISLATION: SVMC 3.35.10 — Contract Authority PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: • June 8, 2021 —Adoption of Resolution 21-002 adopting the 2022-2027 Six -Year Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP). • June 14, 2022 — Adoption of Resolution 22-010 adopting the 2023-2028 Six -Year Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP). • July 26, 2022 - City Council approval for staff to apply for project funding from TIB, including Broadway and Park Intersection project • February 21, 2023- Admin report discussing the 2023 construction projects. BACKGROUND: To minimize the impact to the traveling public and streamline project delivery, the Broadway & Park Intersection Project #347 includes the improvements of the Park Road Sidewalk Project #344 — Broadway to Caltaldo. The improvements are funded with grants from the Transportation Improvement Board (TIB) and the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and various city funds. This project will reconstruct the intersection with concrete pavement, replace the existing signal system, replace existing narrow sidewalks, install sidewalk on the west side of Park Road from Broadway to Cataldo, and upgrade stormwater facilities. Spokane County Water District #3 wants to upgrade the water main within the limits of the concrete intersection and requested that the water main replacement be included as part of the City's project. Their work is identified as Alternate 1 (Schedule B in Bid Tabulation) in the construction documents. To pay for the water main upgrade, an Interlocal Agreement will be executed between the City and district. The expenditures and budjets for the projects are shown below: Combined Projects: #344 & 347 Revenues: TIB $ CDBG $ City Fund 403 $ City Fund 311 $ REET $ Water District $ 1,963,070 358,076 47,000 220,000 401,854 172,800 Expenditures: Preliminary Engineering Rights -of -Way Road Construction Water Construction Sidewalk Construction $ 105,000 $ 60,000 $ 2,495,000 $ 172,800 $ 330,000 Total funds available $ 3,162,800 Total est. expenditures $ 3,162,800 The Engineer's Estimate for the total construction contract was $2,727,853.46. The project was advertised on April 28 2023. The City received four bids on May 12, 2023. The lowest, responsive, responsible bidder is Cameron Reilly, LLC with a bid of $2,396,434.76, approximately 12% less than the engineer's estimate. The project's bid tabulation is attached. OPTIONS: 1) Move to award the contract to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder, or 2) take other appropriate action. RECOMMEN DED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to award the Broadway and Park Intersection Project #0347 to Cameron Reilly, LLC for the Base Bid and Alternate 1 Bid in the amount of $2,383,383.00 plus applicable sales tax, and authorize the City Manager to finalize and execute the construction contract. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: There are sufficient funds to cover the construction costs for the construction contract. STAFF CONTACT: Rob Lochmiller, PE, CIP Engineering Manager ATTACHMENTS: Bid Tabulation — Broadway & Park Intersection BID TABULATION Broadway and Park Intersection Project Project CIP No. 0347 '/alley ITEM # DESCRPTION UNITS QUANTITY ENGINEERS ESTIMATE UNIT PRICE TOTAL COST CAMERON REILLV, LLC UNIT PRICE TOTAL COST CORRIDOR CONTRACTORS, LLC UNIT PRICE TOTAL COST ALPINE CONTRACTORS GROUP UNIT PRICE TOTAL COST N.A. DEGESTROM, INC. UNIT PRICE TOTAL COST 100 MOBILIZATION $196,000.00 $196,000.00 5188,645.00 $188 645.00 $235,000.00 101 DOCUMENTATION COMPLIANCE CALC. $10,000.00 $10 000.00 102 103 CLEARING AND GRUBBING REMOVAL OF STRUCTURE AND OBSTRUCTION $20,000.00 $30,000.00 $20,000.00 $30,000.00 $7,000.00 $20,000.00 $7,000.00 $20 000.00 $18,150.00 $24,000.00 104 105 106 REMOVE CEMENT CONCRETE CURB REMOVE CEMENT CONCRETE SIDEWALK/DRIVEWAY APPROACH REMOVE ASPHALT PAVEMENT 210 160 680 $15.00 $20.00 $15.00 $3,150.00 53,200.00 $10,200.00 $10.00 $22.00 $25.00 $2,100.00 $3,520.00 $17,000.00 $17.00 $22.00 $13.00 58,840.00 52,880.00 55.00 107 REMOVE EXISTING CATCH BASIN EACH 5500.00 5500.00 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $1,000.00 5677.00 5677.00 108 REMOVE STORM DRAIN PIPE 10 550.00 5500.00 $155.00 $1,550.00 $65.00 5650.00 5250.00 109 REMOVE EXISTING DRVW ELL EACH $3,000.00 $9,000.00 $1,000.00 $3,000.00 $1,600.00 5677.00 110 ABANDON EXISTING DRVWELL EACH 2 $2,000.00 $4,000.00 $800.00 $1,600.00 $1,500.00 111 112 RESOLUTION OF UTILITY CONFLICTS POTHOLE UTILITY EST. EACH 20 $600.00 $20,000.00 $12,000.00 5500.00 $20,000.00 $10,000.00 $800.00 113 REMOVING PLASTIC LINE 400 53.00 $1,200.00 51.55 $620.00 $2.00 51.50 51.50 114 REMOVING PAINT LINE 4,300 51.00 $4,300.00 50.55 53,655.00 51.00 50.55 53,655.00 115 ROADWAY EXCAVATION INCL. HAUL 2,600 540.00 $104,000.00 $32.00 583,200.00 $28.50 550.00 116 TRENCH EXCAVATION SAFETY SYSTEM $5,000.00 $5,000.00 5250.00 5250.00 $10,000.00 117 DUCTILE IRON STORM SEWER PIPE 10IN DIAM. 295 $100.00 $29,500.00 $130.00 $38 350.00 $210.00 118 119 120 121 122 123 DUCTILE IRON STORM SEWER PIPE 12 IN DIAM. SOLID WALL PVC STORM SEWER PIPE 12 IN DAM. CATCH BASIN TYPE 1 CATCH BASIN TYPE 2, 4E IN. DIAM. CONNECTION TO DRAINAGE STRUCTURE CONNECTION TO EXISTING STORM DRAIN PIPE EACH EACH EACH EACH 180 535 6 $105.00 $80.00 $3,500.00 $5,000.00 $1,500.00 $1,000.00 $18,900.00 542,800.00 $31,500.00 $30,000.00 $1,500.00 $1,000.00 $165.00 $125.00 $3,500.00 $4,500.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $29,700.00 566,875.00 $31,500.00 $27,000.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $215.00 $110.00 $3,700.00 $5,000.00 $1,200.00 $1,200.00 558,850.00 533,300.00 522,860.00 528,800.00 124 PRECAST CONCRETE DRVW ELL TYPE B EACH $7,500.00 $7,500.00 $7,500.00 $7,500.00 $7,500.00 125 126 CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE, 4 IN. DEPTH CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE, 8 IN. DEPTH 4,400 1,660 $10.00 $20.00 $44,000.00 533,200.00 58.00 $20.00 $35,200.00 533,200.00 $11.00 $18.00 529,880.00 127 GRAVEL DRIVEWAY, 3 IN. DEPTH 90 $15.00 $1,350.00 $15.00 $1,350.00 $95.00 540.00 53,600.00 128 129 130 131 132 133 CEMENT CONC. PAVEMENT RIDE SMOOTHNESS COMPLIANCE ADJUSTMENT CEMENT CONCRETE COMPLIANCE ADJUSTMENT PLANING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT HMA CL. 3/8 IN. PG 64H-28, 2 INCH DEPTH HMA CL. 3/8 IN. PG 64H-28, 4 INCH DEPTH CALC. CALC. 1,350 3,600 4,250 650 5550.00 55.00 $15.00 $30.00 $742,500.00 -51.00 -51.00 $18,000.00 $63,750.00 $19,500.00 5400.00 $3.25 $15.00 $34.00 $540,000.00 -51.00 -51.00 $11,700.00 $63,750.00 $22,100.00 5485.00 $7.40 $16.50 $37.00 526,640.00 51.50 5739,800.00 572,250.00 5500.00 55.00 134 H MA CL. 3/8 IN. PG 64H-28, 6 INCH DEPTH, PATCH 1,020 550.00 $51,000.00 $48.00 $49 960.00 $53.00 135 136 137 138 139 HMA COMMERCIAL ASPHALT CURB TYPE C JOB MIX COMPLIANCE PRICE ADJUSTMENT COMPACTION PRICE ADJUSTMENT HMA SURFACE SMOOTHNESS COMPLIANCE CALC. CALC. CALC. 190 90 $75.00 550.00 $14,250.00 $4,500.00 -51.00 -51.00 -51.00 $65.00 $25.00 512,350.00 52 250.00 -51.00 -51.00 -51.00 $58.00 $27.00 -51.00 -51.00 -51.00 140 141 142 EROSION CONTROL AND WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION ESC LEAD INLET PROTECTION EST. DAY EACH 30 22 $200.00 $100.00 $10,000.00 $6,000.00 52,200.00 $150.00 $150.00 $10,000.00 $4,500.00 53,300.00 5250.00 $100.00 52,200.00 540.00 550.00 56,650.00 53,300.00 143 SILT FENCE 510 57.00 $3,570.00 $15.00 $7,650.00 $5.50 52,805.00 57.50 53,825.00 57.50 53,825.00 144 145 WATTLE GRAVEL PATCHBACK, 2 IN. DEPTH 80 410 $10.00 $25.00 $800.00 $10,250.00 $45.00 58.00 53,600.00 53,280.00 540.00 $20.00 53,200.00 58,200.00 57.50 57.50 52,665.00 146 147 RIVER ROCK TOPSOIL TYPE C, 2 IN. DEPTH 90 570 $25.00 540.00 52,250.00 522,800.00 $35.00 59.00 $3,150.00 $5,130.00 $17.00 $12.00 56,840.00 53,330.00 59.50 148 SOD INSTALLATION 570 $20.00 $11,400.00 $18.00 $10,260.00 $31.00 149 150 IRRIGATION SYSTEM REVISION PROJECT TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL EST. $175,000.00 $15,000.00 $175,000.00 $65,000.00 $15,000.00 $65,000.00 $102,000.00 598,970.00 598,970.00 151 152 TRAFFIC CONTROL SUPERVISOR WORK ZONE SAFETY CONTINGENCY EST. $25,000.00 $25,000.00 $20,000.00 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 $20 000.00 $81,000.00 153 CEMENT CONC. TRAFFIC CURB 200 $35.00 $7,000.00 540.00 5E 000.00 544.00 58,800.00 550.00 154 155 156 CEMENT CONC. TRAFFIC CURB AND GUTTER CEMENT CONC. PEDESTRIAN CURB CEMENT CONC. TRAFFIC ISLAND 12 IN. WIDE 2,040 120 150 $35.00 $35.00 $80.00 $71,400.00 $4,200.00 $12,000.00 540.00 $30.00 $35.00 $81,600.00 53,600.00 $5 250.00 $47.00 $32.00 $48.00 53,840.00 53,960.00 58,850.00 157 DELINEATOR AND CORE HOLE EACH 5250.00 5250.00 $225.00 $225.00 5250.00 5250.00 5250.00 5250.00 5250.00 5250.00 158 BULLNOSE MARKER EACH 5750.00 5750.00 5750.00 5750.00 $811.00 5750.00 5750.00 159 TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYSTEM - BROADWAY AVE. $300,000.00 $300,000.00 $265,000.00 $265,000.00 $264,000.00 160 161 ITS SYSTEM PERMANENT SIGNING $50,000.00 $20,000.00 $50,000.00 $20,000.00 $40,000.00 $12,500.00 $40,000.00 $12,500.00 $39,000.00 162 PAINT LINE 3,100 51.50 $4,650.00 50.50 $1,550.00 50.50 163 PAINTED TRAFFIC ARROW EACH 6 5250.00 $1,500.00 $90.00 5540.00 5588.00 5594.00 5540.00 BID TABULATION Broadway and Park Intersection Project Project CIP No. 0347 Walley ITEM # DESCRPTION UNITS QUANTITY ENGINEERS ESTIMATE CAMERON REILLY, LLC CORRIDOR CONTRACTORS, LLC ALPINE CONTRACTORS GROUP N.A. DEGESTROM, INC. UNIT PRICE TOTAL COST UNIT PRICE TOTAL COST UNIT PRICE TOTAL COST UNIT PRICE TOTAL COST UNIT PRICE TOTAL COST 164 PLASTIC LINE L.F. 4,200 $3.50 $14,700.00 $4.00 $16,900.00 $4.50 $19,900.00 $4.50 $18,900.00 $4.00 $16,800.00 165 PLASTIC WIDE LANE LINE L.F. 3,500 $6.00 $21,000.00 $8.50 $29,750.00 $8.60 $30,100.00 $8.50 $29,750.00 $8.00 $28,000.00 166 PLASTIC TRAFFIC ARROW EACH 16 $600.00 $9,600.00 $350.00 $5,600.00 $363.00 $5,808.00 $367.00 $5,872.00 $325.00 $5,200.00 167 PLASTIC BICYCLE LANE SYMBOL EACH 8 $600.00 $4,800.00 $375.00 $3,000.00 $420.00 $3,360.00 $425.00 $3,400.00 $375.00 $3,000.00 168 PLASTIC STOP LINE L.F. 140 $15.00 $2,100.00 $27.50 $3,850.00 $30.00 $4,200.00 $30.00 54,200.00 $27.00 $3,780.00 169 PLASTIC CROSSHATCH MARKING L.F. 280 $3.50 $980.00 $6.00 $1,680.00 $7.00 $1,960.00 $0.85 $238.00 $6.00 $1,680.00 170 PLASTIC CROSSWALK LINE S.F. 590 $20.00 $11,800.00 $15.00 $8,850.00 $16.00 $9,440.00 $15.00 $8,850.00 $14.00 $8,260.00 171 CONSTRUCTION SURVEYING L.S. 1 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 $55,000.00 $55,000.00 $70,500.00 $70,500.00 $74,495.00 $74,495.00 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 172 SPCC PLAN L.S. 1 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $2,589.00 $2,589.00 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 173 PUBLIC LIAISON REPRESENTATIVE L.S. 1 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 $23,800.00 $23,800.00 $7,517.00 $7,517.00 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 174 TRENCH FENCE SAFETY COMPLIANCE CALC. 1 -$1.00 -$1.00 -$1.00 -$1.00 -$1.00 175 ADJUST EXISTING CATCH BASIN OR DRVW ELL EACH 2 $750.00 $1,500.00 $1,200.00 $2,400.00 $1,500.00 $3,000.00 $1,614.00 $3,228.00 $750.00 $1,500.00 176 ADJUST EXISTING MANHOLE EACH 3 $750.00 $2,250.00 $1,200.00 $3,600.00 $1,500.00 $4,500.00 $1,614.00 54,942.00 $750.00 $2,250.00 177 ADJUST EXISTING GAS VALVE EACH 2 $500.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $2,000.00 $1,000.00 $2,000.00 $1,552.00 $3,104.00 $750.00 $1,500.00 178 CEMENT CONC. DRIVEWAY APPROACH S.V. 500 $100.00 $50,000.00 $90.00 $45,000.00 $100.00 $50,000.00 $147.00 $73,500.00 $75.00 $37,500.00 179 CHAINLINK FENCE TYPE 4 L.F. 150 $50.00 $7,500.00 $60.00 $9,000.00 $65.00 $9,750.00 $66.00 $9,900.00 $50.00 $7,500.00 180 CEMENT CONC. SIDEWALK S.V. 880 $60.00 $52,800.00 $55.00 $48,400.00 $85.00 $74,800.00 $118.00 $103,840.00 $75.00 $66,000.00 181 EXTRA CONC. DEPTH FOR SIDEWALK/CURB RAMP S.V. 160 $30.00 $4,800.00 $80.00 $12,800.00 $25.00 $4,000.00 $22.00 $3,520.00 $33.00 $5,280.00 182 CEMENT CONC. CURB RAMP TYPE PARALLEL A EACH 3 $2,500.00 $7,500.00 $2,250.00 $6,750.00 $2,500.00 $7,500.00 $1,977.00 $5,931.00 $3,000.00 $9,000.00 183 CEMENT CONC. CURB RAMP TYPE PARALLEL B EACH 2 $2,500.00 $5,000.00 $1,800.00 $3,600.00 $2,500.00 $5,000.00 $1,845.00 $3,690.00 $3,500.00 $7,000.00 184 CEMENT CONC. CURB RAMP TYPE PERPENDICULAR B EACH 1 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $1,717.00 $1,717.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 185 DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACE S.F. 90 $80.00 $7,200.00 $35.00 $3,150.00 $40.00 $3,600.00 $116.00 $10,440.00 $36.00 $3,240.00 186 MAILBOX SUPPORT, TVPE1 EACH 6 $500.00 $3,000.00 $700.00 $4,200.00 $650.00 $3,900.00 $524.00 $3, 144.00 $500.00 $3,000.00 187 MINOR CHANGE CALC. 1 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 SCHEDULE A -TOTAL $2,635,344.00 $2,236,734.00 $2,672,311.00 $2,767,573.00 $2,832,559.00 SCHEDULE B-WATER IMPROVEMENTS 200 MOBILIZATION L.S. 1 $7,800.00 $7,800.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 $17,589.00 $17,589.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 201 POTHOLE UTILITY EACH 4 $300.00 $1,200.00 $550.00 $2,200.00 $1,100.00 $4,400.00 $818.00 $3,272.00 $1,000.00 54,000.00 202 TRENCH EXCAVATION SAFETY SYSTEM L.S. 1 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 $250.00 $250.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $775.00 $775.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 203 DUCTILE IRON PIPE FOR WATER MAIN 12 IN. DIAM. LF 450 $75.00 $33,750.00 $205.00 $92,250.00 $209.00 $94,050.00 $154.00 $69,300.00 $175.00 $78,750.00 204 TIE IN TO EXISTING WATERLINE, 12 IN EA 4 $3,500.00 $14,000.00 $2,100.00 $8,400.00 $2,000.00 $8,000.00 $5,809.00 $23,236.00 $8,250.00 $33,000.00 205 CUT, CAP, AND ABANDON EXISTING WATERLINE EA 4 $1,000.00 $4,000.00 $700.00 $2,900.00 $2,000.00 $9,000.00 $920.00 $3,690.00 $1,500.00 $6,000.00 206 REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT EA 1 $500.00 $500.00 $1,750.00 $1,750.00 $1,825.00 $1,825.00 $2,286.00 $2,286.00 $950.00 $950.00 207 WATER SERVICE RECONNECTION EA 2 $1,500.00 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 $6,000.00 $3,000.00 $6,000.00 $2,254.00 54,509.00 $2,200.00 54,400.00 208 CONSTRUCTION SURVEYING L.S. 1 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $3,493.00 $3,493.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 209 TRENCH FENCE SAFETY COMPLIANCE CALC. 1 -$1.00 -$1.00 -$1.00 -$1.00 -$1.00 210 ADJUST EXISTING WATER VALVE EACH 12 $500.00 $6,000.00 $1,000.00 $12,000.00 $1,000.00 $12,000.00 $1,692.00 $20,304.00 $850.00 $10,200.00 211 ADJUST EXISTING UTILITY VAULT EACH 1 $1,200.00 $1,200.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $1,614.00 $1,614.00 $850.00 $850.00 212 MINOR CHANGE CALC. 1 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 SCHEDULE B-SUBTOTAL 584,949.00 $146,649.00 $165,774.00 $155,056.00 $154,149.00 SCHEDULE B-SALES TAX 08.9% $7,560.46 $13,051.76 $14,753.89 $13,799.98 $13,719.26 SCHEDULE B-TOTAL $92,509.46 $159,700.76 $180,527.89 $168,855.98 $167,868.26 BASE BID TOTAL (SCH. A) $2,635,344.00 $2,236,734.00 $2,672,311.00 $2,767,573.00 $2,832,559.00 BASE BID & ALTERNALTE 1 TOTAL (SCH. A+SCH. B) $2,727,853.46 $2,396,434.76 $2,852,838.89 $2,936,428.98 $3,000,427.26 CHECKLIST Addendum Acknowledged VES VES VES VES No. 1 Competitive bids were opened on May 12, 2023. I hereby certify to the best of my ability that this is a true and correct bid tabulation for the No.2 Contractor Certification Wage Law Compliance Broadway an Park Intesection roject, CIP 40347 Contractor's Administrative Information Bidder Qualification Statement � Subcontractor's List Bid 8itl Deposit Form Bid Deposit Surety Form By Robert Lochmiller, PE Surety Power of Attorney Representations and Certifications Non -Collusion Declaration Local Agency Certification for Federal -Aid Contracts ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Highlighted amounts h ve been corrected 2 of 2 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: May 30, 2023 Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ information ❑ admin. report Department Director Approval: ® new business ❑ public hearing ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Motion Consideration: Interlocal Agreement with Spokane County Water District No. 3 for the Broadway & Park Intersection Project #347. GOVERNING LEGISLATION: SVMC 3.35.10 — Contract Authority PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: • June 8, 2021 — Adoption of Resolution 21-002 adopting the 2022-2027 Six -Year Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP). • June 14, 2022 — Adoption of Resolution 22-010 adopting the 2023-2028 Six -Year Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP). • July 26, 2022 - City Council approval for staff to apply for project funding from TIB, including Broadway and Park Intersection project. • February 21, 2023- Admin report discussing the 2023 construction projects. BACKGROUND: The Broadway & Park Intersection project will reconstruct the intersection with concrete pavement, replace the existing signal system, replace existing narrow sidewalks, and upgrade stormwater facilities. Spokane County Water District No. 3 plans to upgrade the water main within the limits of the concrete intersection and requested that the water main replacement be included as part of the City's project. Their work is identified as Alternate 1 in the construction documents. To pay for the water main upgrade, an Interlocal Agreement executed by the City and district is necessary. According to the Agreement, Spokane County Water District No. 3 will pay for the costs to upgrade the water main, plus a portion of the construction management and material testing costs of the project. OPTIONS: 1) Authorize staff to finalize and execute the Interlocal Agreement with Spokane County Water District No. 3 or, 2) take other appropriate action RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to authorize the City Manager to finalize and execute the Interlocal Agreement between Spokane County Water District No. 3 and the City for the Broadway & Park Intersection project. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: As per the Interlocal Agreement, the City will be responsible for the total construction contract costs. The Interlocal Agreement requires the water district to reimburse the City for the water main construction costs, plus a portion of the construction management and material testing costs of the project. The overall impact to the City is negligible as costs incurred on behalf of the Water District will be reimbursed by the Water District. STAFF CONTACT: Rob Lochmiller, PE, CIP Engineering Manager ATTACHMENTS: Final Draft Interlocal Agreement INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY AND SPOKANE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT NO. 3 FOR WATERLINE REPLACEMENT TO BE INCLUDED IN THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY BROADWAY AND PARK INTERSECTION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 0347 WHEREAS, the City of Spokane Valley (hereinafter the "CITY") intends to construct a road improvement project known as the Broadway and Park Intersection Capital Improvement Project 0347 (hereinafter the "PROJECT") within the CITY's jurisdiction; and WHEREAS, Spokane County Water District No. 3 (hereinafter the "DISTRICT") owns and operates water utilities within the CITY's rights -of -way and within the PROJECT's limits; and WHEREAS, DISTRICT has requested to replace a portion of its water line within the PROJECT's limits, approximately 500 linear feet on Park Road, prior to the completion of the PROJECT; and WHEREAS, the CITY and DISTRICT agree to include the replacement of the water line (hereinafter the "WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS") as part of the PROJECT; and WHEREAS, DISTRICT will pay for the WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS as described herein; and NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the terms and conditions set forth herein, it is agreed among and between the CITY and DISTRICT as follows: ARTICLE 1— RESPONSIBILITY OF THE DISTRICT 1.1. Provide design plans, design details, and specifications for the WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS 1.2. Review construction bids provided by the CITY and provide written notice of approval or disapproval of the Additive Alternate Bid of the WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS to the CITY no later than five business days following opening of bids. 1.3. Promptly review and approve all Source of Materials submittals regarding the WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS. 1.4. DISTRICT shall have the right to inspect the WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS with its representatives, employees, and inspectors to confirm that the WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS is in compliance with the terms of this Agreement. CITY shall allow the DISTRICT and its representatives, employees, and inspectors reasonable fulltime access to the worksite, so that the WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS may be inspected. DISTRICT shall not interrupt or disturb other work of the Project, except as necessary as part of such inspection. DISTRICT shall not direct the CITY' s contractor; DISTRICT shall notify the CITY of any corrections to the construction of the WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS and the CITY shall direct the contractor, accordingly. 1.5. DISTRICT shall fund the costs associated with designing and constructing the WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS based on the following: Page 1 of 4 1.5.1. The costs for WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS construction items quantified by unit increments (such as acre, cubic yard, day, each, linear foot) shall be based upon the actual quantities installed in the WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS and actual CITY's contractor's unit costs for those items. 1.5.2. The costs for lump sum items (such as surveying, trench excavation safety system) directly related to constructing the WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS shall be based upon the actual CITY's contractor item costs for those items. 1.5.3. Any additional costs associated with change orders and/or valid claims for the WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS shall be reviewed by the DISTRICT before approval. 1.5.4. Costs for the CITY's construction management and material testing for the WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS shall be prorated based on 8% of the total costs in items 1.5.1, 1.5.2 and 1.5.3 above. 1.6. The DISTRICT shall reimburse the CITY amounts billed within 45 days following receipt of the invoice from the CITY. 1.7. Upon completion of the WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS by the contractor and a passed final inspection by the DISTRICT, the DISTRICT shall provide the CITY with written acceptance of the UTILITY WORK prior to paving of the roadway. ARTICLE 2 — RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE CITY 2.1. Incorporate the WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS design, details, and specifications into the PROJECT's construction contract. The City's roadway work bid items shall be listed as the Base Bid for the project. The WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS construction bid items shall be listed as an Additive Alternate Bid using a separate pay schedule within the contract documents. 2.2. Provide a copy of the plans and specifications for the construction project to the DISTRICT for the review and approval prior to advertisement of the project. 2.3. Upon public opening of the bid documents, the CITY shall promptly provide a copy of the bid tabulation to the DISTRICT. 2.4. The City shall award the project to the lowest responsible bidder for the Base Bid plus Additive Alternate Bid (WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS), upon approval from the DISTRICT for the Additive Alternate Bid. If the DISTRICT disapproves the Additive Alternate Bid of the low combined bidder, the City may award the contract to the lowest bidder for just the Base Bid and the DISTRICT shall have no further obligation to the CITY under this Interlocal Agreement nor any obligation to the bidder. The City may reject all bids and rebid the project at their discretion. 2.5. Provide copies of all Source of Materials submittals for the WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS to the DISTRICT for its review and approval before use of the materials on the Project. 2.6. Provide field inspection and material testing of trench excavation and trench backfilling required for the WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS. 2.7. Provide construction management and control surveying for the WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS. Page 2 of 4 2.8. Make monthly progress payments to the contractor based on the City's inspector's field measurements of installed WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS. 2.9. Provide a monthly statement of progress payments made to the contractor for the WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS, and a bill requesting reimbursement for those costs to the DISTRICT. Provide the DISTRICT with copies of invoices and statements submitted by the Contractor to the CITY related to the WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS. 2.10. Provide a report of final costs for the WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS to the DISTRICT following completion of the construction contract. The report shall include a breakdown of costs incurred by the CITY. ARTICLE 3 — DURATION This Interlocal Agreement shall terminate upon the completion of the construction project, and fulfillment of all obligations of the Parties provided for hereunder and completion of payments under the prevailing wage laws, provided that any warranties from the contractor to the CITY or DISTRICT shall continue in full force and effect. ARTICLE 4 — INTERLOCAL PROVISIONS 4.1 PURPOSE: See Article 1 & 2. 4.2 DURATION: See Article 3. 4.3 ORGANIZATION OF SEPARATE ENTITY AND ITS POWERS. No separate entity is created pursuant to this Interlocal Agreement. 4.4 RESPONSIBILITIES OF PARTIES. See Article 1 & 2. 4.5 ADMINISTRATION. The administrator for the CITY shall be the City Manager or designee. The administrator for the DISTRICT shall be the DISTRICT Board or its designee. 4.5 AGREEMENT TO BE FILED: The Parties shall file and publish this Agreement as provided by law. 4.6 TERMINATION. A Party may terminate this Agreement for a breach upon 60 days' notice to the other Party. Provided, that each Party shall have the right to rectify any breach prior to the end of the 60 days' notice period. 4.7 PROPERTY UPON TERMINATION. Title to all property acquired by any Party in the performance of this Agreement shall remain with the acquiring Party upon termination of the Agreement; Provided that the DISTRICT shall own all WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS upon completion of the construction project and fulfillment of all its obligations. The Parties have executed this Interlocal Agreement this day of , 2023. CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY: Page 3 of 4 John Hohman, City Manager ATTEST: Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Office of the City Attorney SPOKANE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT NO. 3: By. Printed Name: 1Z-1/14,— Title: �fs�c,Y /f/%t,,/' ✓ Date: .5-2 ze23. Page 4 of 4 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: May 30, 2023 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ® new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Motion Consideration — Bid Award for Local Access Streets — Summerfield East Neighborhood Project No.: 0339 GOVERNING LEGISLATION: SVMC 3.35.10 — Contract Authority PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: • June 8, 2021 —Adoption of Resolution 21-002 adopting the 2022-2027 Six -Year Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP). • June 14, 2022 — Adoption of Resolution 22-010 adopting the 2023-2028 Six -Year Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP). • February 21, 2023- Admin report discussing the 2023 construction projects. BACKGROUND: The Local Access Streets — Summerfield Neighborhood project is funded with city funds. This project will remove the existing asphalt, regrade the base course and repave the existing streets. The project is in the vicinity of an elementary school and middle school and includes the replacement of non -compliant ADA ramps. Local Access Streets — Summerfield Neighborhood Project #339 Revenues: Expenditures: City Fund 106 $ 1,622,600.00 Preliminary Engineering $ 77,400 City Fund 311 $ 77,400.00 Construction $ 1,622,600 Total funds available $ 1,700,000.00 Total est. expenditures $ 1,700,000.00 The Engineer's Estimate for the total construction contract was $1,616,703.00. The project was advertised on May 5, 2023. The City received and opened four bids on May 19, 2023. The lowest, responsive, responsible bidder is Inland Asphalt Company with a bid of $1,407,000.00, approximately 13% less than the engineer's estimate. The project's bid tabulation is attached. OPTIONS: 1) Move to award the contract to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder, or 2) take other appropriate action. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to award the Bid Award for Local Access Streets — Summerfield East Neighborhood Project No.: 0339 to Inland Asphalt Company in the amount of $1,407,000.00 and authorize the City Manager to finalize and execute the construction contract. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: There are sufficient funds to cover the construction costs for both projects. STAFF CONTACT: Rob Lochmiller, PE, CIP Engineering Manager ATTACHMENTS: Bid Tabulation — Local Access Streets — Summerfield Neighborhood BID TABULATION Local Access Streets - Summerfield Neighborhood Project CIP No. 0339 S`pikan►. -,2,� ,l2efy14 D§ i$ ![Ni _ -_ -- - UNITS QUANTITY ENGINEERS ESTIMATE INLAND ASPHALT COMPANY SELLAND CONSTRUCTION POE ASPHALT PAVING SHAMROCK UNIT PRICE TOTAL COST UNIT PRICE. TOTAL COST UNIT PRICE TOTAL COST UNIT PRICE TOTAL COST UNIT PRICE TOTAL COST SCHEDULE A -ROADWAY, SIDEWALK, AND SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS 100 MINOR CHANGE cALc 1 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 525,000.40 <.zs,oro.DO 2s,000.ao 101 CONSTRULTION SURVEYING LS 1 520,000,00 $20,000.00 526,250.00 $25,250.00 $17,000.00 $17,000.00 $52,650.00 551,650.00 $30,000.00 $30,000.00 102 SPCC PLAN LS 1 $2,000.00 52,000.00 5500.00 $500.00 .$650.00 5650.00 $1,200.00 51,200.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 103 PUBLIC LIAISON REPRESENTATIVE LS 1 510,000.00 510,000.00 55,300.00 $5,900.00 $10,650,00 510,650.00 $28,600.06 $28,000.00 510,00000 $10,000.00 104 MOBILIZATION 15 1 $160,000.00 5160,000.00 $104,000.00 $104,000.00 $60,400.00 560,400.00 $130,000.00 $130,000.00 $96,657,00 $96,657.00 105 PROJECT TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1 $25,000.00 525,000.00 $97,998.50 $97,998.50 $25,000.00 525,000.00 $120,000.00 5120,000.00 5$2,400.00 552,400.00 106 DOCUMENTATION COMPLIANCE EST 1 510,000.00 310,000.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 S10000.00 107 REMOVE CEMENT CONCRETE CURB LF 610 $15.00 $9,150.00 $22.00 513,420.00 $7.00 $4,270.00 $9.50 55,795.00 $22.00 513420.0D 108 REMOVE CEMENT CONCRETE SIDEWALK/ DRIVEWAY APPROACH 5Y 400 $25.00 510,000.00 $30.65 $12,260.00 $73.00 $29,200.00 $77.05 $30,820.00 53500 $14000.00 109 REMOVAL OF STRUCTURES ANDOBSTRUCTIONS L5 1 57,500.00 $7,500.00 58,750.00 $8,750.00 54,500.00 $4,500.00 53,300.00 $3,300.00 $7,500.00 $7,500.00 110 REMOVE ASPHALT PAVEMENT 50 36,000 54.00 $144,000.00 53,45 5124,200,00 $3.00 5108,000.00 $2.90 $104,400.00 $4.80 $172,800.00 111 PAVEMENT REPAIR EXCAVATION INCL. HAUL SY 4,600 510.00 346,000.00 $5,80 $31,280.00 $10.00 $45,,000.00 $10.55 348,530.00 513.50 562,100.00 112 REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT OF UNSUITABLE MATERIAL CY 100 $150.00 515,000.00 $150.00 515,000,00 528.00 52,800.00 542.10 $4,210.00 $185.00 $18,500.00 113 GRADING SY 35,000 52,00 $72,000.00 $2.50 $90,000.00 $2.00 552,000,00 $1.60 557,600.00 52.95 $106,200.00 1131 CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE, 6IN. DEPTH SY 4,600 $13.00 $59,800.00 $7.00 532,200.00 514.00 $64,400.00 $6.65 $31,510.00 $16.00 573,600.00 115 HMA CI..3/BIN. PG 64H-283IN. DEPTH 50 35,000 $20,00 5720,000.00 515.80 5568,800,00 $16.00 $576,000.00 $15.10 5543,603.00 518.60 $676,800.00 116 103 MIX COMPLIANCE PRICE ADJUSTMENT CALC 1 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 117 OMPACTION PRICE ADJUSTMENT CALL 1 51.00 $1.00 $3,00 S1.00 51.00 118 HMA SURFACE SMOOTHNESS COMPLANCE CALL 1 $1.00 $1.00 51.00 51.00 $1.00 119 50L10 WALL EVCSTORM SEWER PIPE 81N. DIA. LF 60 $100.00 $6,000.00 $225.00 $13,500.00 $65,00 $3,900.00 571.60 54,296.00 $15000 $9,000.00 EXISTING MANHOLE EACH 27 $750.00 520,250.00 $1,100.00 $29,700.00 $3,000.00 $81,000.00 52,950.00 $79,650.00 51,20000 $32,400.00 121 ADJUST EXISTING GAS VALVE EACH 5 $450.00 52,250.00 $655.00 $3,275.00 $2,200.00 $11,000.00 $2,320.00 $11,600.00 $90000 $4,500.00 122 AOIUST EXISTING WATER VALVE EACH 30 $425.00 512,750.00 5E65.00 $19,950.00 52,200.00 566,000,00 $2,320.00 $59,600.00 $900.00 $27000.00 123 EROSION CONTROL AND WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION I5 1 $10,000.00 $14000.00 S10,225.00 $10,125.00 $27,500.00 $27,500.00 $21,000.00 $21,000.00 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 124 IRRIGATION SYSTEM REVISION EST 1 $13,500.00 $13,500.00 $13,500.00 $13,500.00 $13,500.00 125 CEMENT 00NC.TRAFFICC1.1118 LF 610 $75.00 54$,750.00 561.85 537,726.50 56100 $37,210.00 560,50 536,905.00 $62.00 537A20.00 126 CEMENT CONC. PEDESTRIAN CURD LE 400 555.00 $22,000.60 552.40 520,960.00 54000 S16,000.00 551.00 $20,400.00 $53.00 521200.00 127 CEMENT CONC. 51 DEWALK 51 400 $95.00 538,000.00 $109.00 $43,600.00 $113.10 $45,240.00 $106.00 512,40000 $115.00 346,000.00 128 CEMENT CONC. CURB RAMP TYPE PARALLEL A EACH 5 54,500.00 $22,50000 52,00000 $10,000,00 $4,940,00 524,700.00 $1,900.00 $9,500.00 $2,000.00 $10,000.00 129 CEMENT CONC. CURB RAMP TYPE PARALLEL B EACH 12 $4,50000 554,000,00 52,000.00 524,000,00 $5,115,00 $61,380.00 $1,900.00 $22,800.00 52,000.00 $24,000.00 130 CEMENTCONC. CURD RAMP TYPE PERPENDICULAR R EACH 7 $4,500.00 531,50000 $1,700.00 $11,900.00 $4,940.00 $34,560.00 51,650.00 $11,550.00 51,80000 $12600.00 131 MAILBOX SUPPORT (GROUP 004) EACH 5750.00 575000 52,650,00 32,653.00 52,100.00 32,100.00 52,100.00 52,100.00 31,100.00 51,100.00 132 MAILBOX SUPPORT PAD AND BOLTS (GROUP BOX) EACH 1 52,000.00 $2,000,00 $550.00 5550.00 51,600.00 $1,600.00 $600.00 5600.00 S900.00 $300.00 SCHEDULE A -TOTAL $1,516,703.00 $1,407,000.00 51,451,563.00 51,542,519.00. 51,625,000.00 CHECKLIST Addendum Acknowledged YE5 YES YES YES N0.1 J ✓ Competitive bids were opened On May 19, 2023. I hereby certify to the Contractor Certification Wage Law Compliance / ✓ ✓ ✓ best of my ability that this is a true and correct bid tabulation for the Local Contractor's Administrative Infomlation ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Access St Bets - Summerfleld Neighborhood Project, CIP H 0339 00Ider Qualification Statement ✓ ✓ ✓ Subcontractor's List Bid Deposit Form ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Bid Deposit Surety Form I J ✓ J Surety ower of Attorney ✓ J ✓ ✓ Robert Lochmiller, PE Representations and Certifications J ✓ ✓ ✓ Recycled Material Form ✓ ✓ J ✓ Highlighted amounts have been corrected CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: May 30, 2023 Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ information ❑ admin. report Department Director Approval: ® new business ❑ public hearing ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Motion Consideration — Bid Award for Broadway at 1-90 Preservation Project -Phase 1 No.: 0341 GOVERNING LEGISLATION: SVMC 3.35.10 — Contract Authority PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: • March 23, 2021 — Administration report on potential grant opportunity with SRTC's "Preservation Call for Projects," project included as a possible candidate. • April 6, 2021 — City Council approval for staff to apply for project funding from SRTC, including Broadway at 1-90 Preservation project. • June 8, 2021 —Adoption of Resolution 21-002 adopting the 2022-2027 Six -Year Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP). • June 14, 2022 — Adoption of Resolution 22-010 adopting the 2023-2028 Six -Year Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP). • February 21, 2023- Admin report discussing the 2023 construction projects. BACKGROUND: The Broadway at 1-90 Presevation Project -Phase 1 will grind and overlay Broadway Avenue between Fancher Road and Thierrman Road. The project includes additional pavement repair patches and extend the concrete pavement at signalized intersections. Revenues: Expenditures (Proposed): Federal Grant $ 786,285.00 Preliminary Engineering $ 140,000.00 City Fund 311 $ 1,018,715.00 Rights -of -Way $ 30,000.00 Construction $ 1,635,000.00 Total budget $ 1,805,000.00 Total est. expenditures $ 1,805,000.00 The Engineer's Estimate for construction was $1,159,374.00. The project was advertised on April 21, 2023. The City received and opened only one bid on May 16, 2023. The lowest, responsive, responsible bidder is Inland Asphalt Company with a bid of $1,282,828.00, approximately 10.6% higher than the engineer's estimate. The project's bid tabulation is attached. OPTIONS: 1) Move to award the contract to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder, or 2) take other appropriate action. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to award the Broadway at 1-90 Preservation Project -Phase 1 No.: 0341 to Inland Asphalt Company in the amount of $1,282,828.00 and authorize the City Manager to finalize and execute the construction contract. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: There are sufficient funds to cover the construction costs for this project. STAFF CONTACT: Rob Lochmiller, PE, CIP Engineering Manager ATTACHMENTS: Bid Tabulation — Broadway at 1-90 Preservation Project -Phase 1 BID TABULATION Broadway at 1-90 Preservation, Phase 1 Project CIP No. 0341 Spokane . Val ley ITEM# DESCRPTION UNITS QUANTITY ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE INLAND ASPHALT COMPANY UNIT PRICE TOTAL COST UNIT PRICE TOTAL COST SCHEDULE A -PAVEMENT PRESERVATION 100 MOBILIZATION L.S. 1 $86,000.00 $ 86,000.00 $119,627.25 $ 119,627.25 101 REMOVE CEMENT CONC. CURB L.F. 35 $10.00 $ 350.00 $42.35 $ 1,482.25 102 ROADWAY EXCAVATION INCL. HAUL C.Y. 770 $35.00 $ 26,950.00 $55.75 $ 42,927.50 103 CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE, 6IN. DEPTH S.Y. 2,140 $35.00 $ 74,900.00 $17.00 $ 36,380.00 104 POROUS GRAVEL SHOULDER S.F. 90 $35.00 $ 3,150.00 $12.00 $ 1,080.00 105 PLANING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT S.Y. 9,400 $3.00 $ 28,200.00 $6.90 $ 64,860.00 106 HMA CL. 3/8 IN. PG 64H-28, 4 INCH DEPTH PATCH S.Y. 2,130 $30.00 $ 63,900.00 $36.30 $ 77,319.00 107 HMA FOR PRELEVELING CL. 3/8 IN. PG 64H-28 TON 450 $130.00 $ 58,500.00 $120.80 $ 54,360.00 108 HMA CL. 3/8 IN. PG 64H-28 TON 1,050 $115.00 $ 120,750.00 $132.50 $ 139,125.00 109 COMMERCIAL HMA S.Y. 15 $200.00 $ 3,000.00 $87.00 $ 1,305.00 110 JOB MIX COMPLIANCE PRICE ADJUSTMENT CALC 1 $ (100)e,n;v��,��,�� $ (1.00) 111 COMPACTION PRICE ADJUSTMENT CALC 1 $ (100) e ',./,')�, 0!. �!J% $ (1.00) 112 H MA SURFACE SMOOTHNESS COMPLIANCE CALC 1 $ (100)e ',./,')�, .0, $ (1.00) 113 EROSION/WATER POLLUTION CONTROL EST. 1 $ 5,00000 eA%,,,i �/A Q,&,/ $ 5,000.00 114 ESC LEAD DAY 10 $300.00 $ 3,000.00 $232.00 $ 2,320.00 115 INLET PROTECTION EACH 12 $100.00 $ 1,200.00 $150.00 $ 1,800.00 116 CEMENT CONC. TRAFFIC CURB AND GUTTER L.F. 35 $50.00 $ 1,750.00 $90.50 $ 3,167.50 117 PLASTIC LINE L.F. 7,200 $5.00 $ 36,000.00 $4.50 $ 32,400.00 118 PLASTIC STOP LINE L.F. 55 $12.00 $ 660.00 $18.10 $ 995.50 119 PLASTIC RAILROAD CROSSING SYMBOL EACH 4 $2,000.00 $ 8,000.00 $1,500.00 $ 6,000.00 120 TEMPORARY PAVEMENT MARKING -SHORT DURATION L.F. 3,800 $3.00 $ 11,400.00 $1.20 $ 4,560.00 121 TEMPORARY MISC. PAVEMENT MARKING -SHORT DURATION EACH 12 $500.00 $ 6,000.00 $425.00 $ 5,100.00 122 TEMPORARY STOP LINE -SHORT DURATION L.F. 90 $3.00 $ 270.00 $7.25 $ 652.50 123 PERMANENT SIGNING L.S. 1 $5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 $4,250.00 $ 4,250.00 124 TRAFFIC CONTROL SUPERVISOR L.S. 1 $15,000.00 $ 15,000.00 $39,000.00 $ 39,000.00 125 PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC CONTROL L.S. 1 $15,000.00 $ 15,000.00 $17,000.00 $ 17,000.00 126 OTHER TRAFFIC CONTROL LABOR HR. 300 $60.00 $ 18,000.00 $85.70 $ 25,710.00 127 CONSTRUCTION SIGNS, CLASS A S.F. 580 $40.00 $ 23,200.00 $18.10 $ 10,498.00 128 SEQUENTIAL ARROW SIGN HR. 1,800 $5.00 $ 9,000.00 $5.75 $ 10,350.00 129 PORTABLE CHANGEABLE MESSAGE SIGN HR. 420 $10.00 $ 4,200.00 $8.00 $ 3,360.00 130 OTHER TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES L.S. 1 $15,000.00 $ 15,000.00 $16,650.00 $ 16,650.00 131 WORK ZONE SAFETY CONTINGENCY EST. 1 $ 20,000.00 :';; $ 20,000.00 132 ROADWAY SURVEYING L.S. 1 $15,000.00 $ 15,000.00 $13,400.00 $ 13,400.00 133 TRENCH FENCE SAFETY COMPLIANCE CALC. 1 $ (1.00) ;; $ (1.00) 134 SPCC PLAN L.S. 1 $500.00 $ 500.00 $500.00 $ 500.00 135 PUBLIC LIAISON REPRESENTATIVE L.S. 1 $10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $7,000.00 $ 7,000.00 136 ADJUST EXISTING CATCH BASIN OR DRYWELL EACH 20 $750.00 $ 15,000.00 $1,390.00 $ 27,800.00 137 MINOR CHANGE CALC. 1 $ 20,000.00 '''_=` $ 20,000.00 SCHEDULE A -TOTAL $ 723,876.00 $ 815,975.50 SCHEDULE B-CONCRETE PAVEMENT & NON -AGENCY ADJUSTMENTS 200 ROADWAY EXCAVATION INCL. HAUL C.Y. 950 $35.00 $33,250.00 $45.85 $43,557.50 201 CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE, 4 IN. DEPTH S.Y. 2,300 $15.00 $34,500.00 $9.65 $22,195.00 202 CEMENT CONC. PAVEMENT C.Y. 700 $500.00 $350,000.00 $543.00 $380,100.00 203 TIE BAR WITH DRILL HOLE EACH 70 $75.00 $5,250.00 $54.30 $3,801.00 204 CEMENT CONCRETE COMPLIANCE ADJUSTMENT CALC. 1 -$1.00 -$1.00 205 RIDE SMOOTHNESS COMPLIANCE ADJUSTMENT CALC. 1 -$1.00 -$1.00 206 ADJUST EXISTING WATER VALVE EACH 4 $750.00 $3,000.00 $965.25 $3,861.00 207 ADJUST EXISTING MANHOLE EACH 6 $750.00 $4,500.00 $1,390.00 $8,340.00 208 MINOR CHANGE CALC. 1 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 SCHEDULE B-TOTAL $ 435,498.00 $ 466,852.50 PROJECT TOTALS 1,159,374.00 1,282,828.00 Competitive bids were opened on May 16, 2023. I hereby certify to the best of my ability that this is a true and correct bid tabulation for the Broadway at 1-90 Preservation, Phase 1, CIP # 0341 By Robert Lochmiller, PE Addenda Acknowledged No. 1 Contractor Certification Wage Law Compliance Contractor's Administrative Information Bidder Qualification Statement Recycled Material Form Local Agency Subcontractor List Bid Deposit Form Bid Deposit Surety Form Surety Power of Attorney Representations and Certifications Non -Collusion Declaration Local Agency Certification for Federal -Aid Contracts Disadvantage Business Enterprise Certification Disadvantage Business Enterprise (DBE) Written Confirmation Document Disadvantage Business Enterprise (DBE) Bid item Breakdown Form YES CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: May 30, 2023 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ® new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Motion Consideration: Spokane Regional Transportation Council — Request for Regional Projects GOVERNING LEGISLATION: PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: None Taken BACKGROUND: Spokane Regional Transportation Council (SRTC) is the City's metropolitan planning organization. Its mission is to develop plans and programs that coordinate transportation planning in the Spokane region. In 2022, SRTC created its first Unified List of Regional Transportation Priorities (Unified List) as a communications tool to inform state legislators and federal congressional members of the current regional priorities with the intent to strategically position projects and requests for future funding opportunities. In 2022, the City submitted its federal legislative agenda projects for consideration: the Pines Road/BNSF Grade Separation, the Sullivan/Trent interchange, the South Barker Road Corridor, and the Spokane Valley River Loop Trail. For 2023, SRTC is requesting member agencies to update their project lists. Submittals must come only from SRTC member agencies, come from an agency's legislative agenda, and have a link to regional importance. Staff recommends submitting the City's 2023 federal agenda projects: the Sullivan/Trent interchange, the South Barker Road Corridor, and the Argonne Road/I-90 Bridge project. The 2023 requests are due June 2, 2023. During the application process, staff will update the funding and development status for each project as applicable. OPTIONS: Move to authorize the City Manager, or designee, to submit Spokane Valley's 2023 Federal legislative agenda projects for inclusion to SRTC's Unified List, or take other action. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to authorize the City Manager, or designee, to submit Spokane Valley's 2023 Federal legislative agenda projects for inclusion on SRTC's Unified List. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: None. Requests submitted to SRTC are for the purposes of advocacy only. STAFF CONTACT: Gloria Mantz, City Engineer ATTACHMENTS: 2023 Federal Legislative Agenda Project Flyers Siiikane2023 Federal Legislative Agenda �►� Valley 10210 E Sprague Avenue • Spokane Valley WA 99206 Phone: (509) 720-5000 • Fax: (509) 720-5075 • www.spokanevalley.org The City of Spokane Valley's legislative priorities include three capital infrastructure projects and three policy statements. CAPITAL PROJECTS These projects offer practical solutions to improve capacity, mobility, and safety on the National Highway System while preserving and hardening I-90. The City is committed to sustaining a national system with thoughtful local improvements. Pasadena Park `- 3'f N =n: ave MpIlwood t Sullivan/Trent Interchange Total Cost: $42 Million Spo Request: $35.5 Million VaL 271 AUST Argonne Bridge at I-90 Total Cost: $24 Million Request: Pending 0 ,s South Barker Road Corridor Project Total Cost: $29 Million Request: $18 Million ALPHA E Mission i ORE.:NACRES O Reauthorization of the Economic Development Administration (EDA) The City of Spokane Valley supports the reauthorization of the Economic Development Administration (EDA), with funding to carry out its mission of "promoting innovation and competitiveness, preparing American regions for growth and success in the worldwide economy." The City encourages Congress to continue to direct EDA investments at regional and local projects, rather than funding distributed directly to state governments. This flow of funding remains aligned with the EDA's original 1965 authorization and mission. With opportunities for EDA to modernize programs by way of this reauthorization, the City urges Congress to remain traditional in the aspect of direct regional and local investments. Continued Funding at the Authorized Levels for IIJA/BIL Programs The City supports continued funding at the authorized levels for programs included in the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law (IIJA/BIL). Given the unprecedented growth and maintenance needs of existing infrastructure within the region, the City encourages Congre ss to continue to support the levels of funding provided under the IIJA. The City fully supports robust Congress oversight of the U.S. Department of Transportation projects and programs funded under the IIJA, and offers assistance in providing information supporting the level of funding that has been made available. The City encourages Members of Congress to visit the region and see first-hand the extraordinary growth driving the infrastructure improvements and the City's wise stewardship of these funds. Implement Reforms to the Infrastructure Permitting Process The City encourages federal agencies to move swiftly to implement the reforms to the infrastructure permitting process as required under FAST 41 and revised under the IIJA. As the City continues to experience unprecedented growth, streamlining permitting could help address critical safety and infrastructure needs, stimulate economic activity, and provide more employment opportunities. The City encourages Congress, in its oversight role, to encourage the Administration to move expeditiously on implementing these reforms and to ensure that such reforms have practical applications on the implementation of the IIJA. Spokane Interchange Project j'Ualley Sullivan/Trent GOAL: Rebuild interchange with new bridges at Trent Ave. & BNSF Tracks The City will reconstruct the interchange at Trent Avenue (SR 290) and Sullivan Road, one of the region's busiest urban freight corridors. Due to tremendous growth and the 2022 connection of Bigelow Gulch Road, the interchange is failing today. Sullivan Road, between 1-90 and SR 290 is home to 9,000 jobs, 85% directly related to freight. Large employers, including Spokane Business & Industrial Park (SBIP), Kaiser Aluminum, Mercer Mass Timber, and Amazon, move their goods and employees via Trent Avenue, Sullivan Road and Bigelow Gulch Road. The Sullivan Road bridge over Trent Avenue is 62 years old and has a "Poor" condition rating. Bridge height is too short and girders have been struck six times over the last 10 years. NEPDA 1111111111111111111111111111111110 MINNE Spok Comma Collet vista S Bigelow -Sullivan Corridor Eric vauey-. hoof Kaiser Spokane VgAey 4 QQU M f 44VAB Ave k Jey Ave JETox 2,0 Amazon SBIP OPPnRTIJNITV v F. Mercer-* ALPHA E Miss on Ave (; HFFNACRFti Key Improvements • Safety: Eliminates dangerous left turns and minimizes fatal/severe angle collisions • Bridge Condition: Restores substandard bridges to promote freight expansion • Traffic Capacity: Level of Service (LOS) improves from "F" to "A" • All Users: New shared use path and sidewalk provides safety and comfort • Community: Support for proposed design Project Funding $ 5.0 Million Design (Secured) 1.5 Million Right of Way (Secured) + 35.5 Million Construction (Unsecured) $ 42.0 Million Total Project Estimate Funding Request: $35.5 Millio $7,069,500 Total Secured Funds • $2,650,000 Consolidated Appns. Act of 2023 • $2,552,000 National Highway Freight Program • $1,367,500 Spokane Regional Transp. Council • $ 500,000 Local (City) Funds South Barker Road Corridor Projects The Barker Road corridor parallels the eastern boundary of Spokane Valley. The road intersects with Interstate 90 providing access to more than 800 acres of industrial property and 220 acres of homes. The area is experiencing rapid industrial growth north of the interstate, and expanding residential neighborhoods south of the interstate in Spokane County and east in the City of Liberty Lake. Barker Road is a key arterial for vehicles accessing Interstate 90 or the east -west Sprague Avenue corridor. Project Partners Federal Highway Administration Washington State Dept .of Transportation Spokane County Spokane Regional Transportation Council Greater Spokane Valley Chamber of Commerce Projects & Requests Prices are in millions of dollars ($M) 11:0 Mission to Boone - $6.0 M Reconstruction: Widen to 5 Lanes (Not Started) 0 I-90 Interchange & Bridge WSDOT Project: Excluded from Request I-90 to Appleway - $7.0 M Reconstruction: Widen to 5 Lanes (Not Started) Sprague/Barker Roundabout — $2.7 M Single Lane Roundabout (Completed in 2022) Appleway to City Boundary - $7.4 M Reconstruction: Widen to 3 Lanes (Design/ROW) 4tn/Barker Roundabout - $3.0 M Single Lane Roundabout (Design/ROW) 8tn/Barker Roundabout - $2.6 M Single Lane Roundabout (Design/ROW) Spokane ,�►�Valley Funding Completed Projects: Secured Funds: Funds Requested: Total Cost: Status $ 3 million 8 million 18 million $29 million Complete 9% Secured 44 14% Impact Fees 13% Future Funding Request Argonne Road Bridge Spokane g ge Valle Improvements at Interstate 90 Problem Statement The Argonne Road bridge over Interstate 90 (I-90) is the critical bottleneck for people and goods moving through Spokane Valley and eastern Spokane County. The bridge is old, undersized, weight -restricted, and dramatically limits mobility for all users through the commercial and industrial corridor. The bridge requires a third travel lane and new shared -use path over 1-90 to handle projected traffic volumes while safely accommodating all non -motorized users. Current Funding In 2022, the City was awarded $1.2 million for design by Spokane Regional Transportation Council (SRTC) to identify a solution: widen the existing bridge or construct a new bridge. The City anticipates beginning design in 2023. Project Partnerships By 2026, Spokane Transit Authority (STA), the region's transit provider, expects to start building its I-90 regional Park & Ride Facility along the south limits of the interchange. This transit project will be funded primarily by the Washington Dept. of Transportation (WSDOT). Together, the City, STA, and WSDOT will be responsible for collaborating to deliver both projects. Add 3rd Lane to Existing 2 Lane Bridge Existing 3 Lane Bridge to Remain New Park & Ride Transit Facility 2026 ± Next Steps The City will pursue design in 2023 while developing the project scope. The project has a preliminary total cost estimate of $24 million. The City anticipates pursuing federal grant opportunities once the scope is more clearly defined and a more refined cost estimate is created. Key Project Considerations • Existing two-lane bridge has critical shortcomings: ✓ Insufficient bridge clearance over I-90 ✓ Weight restricted and WSDOT rated "fair" ✓ No pedestrian or bicycle facilities provided (new shared use path is proposed) • Argonne Corridor is highly rated by WSDOT: ✓ National Highway System Type 1 ✓ Freight & Goods Transp. System Tier 1 ✓ Congestion Management Process Tier 1 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: May 30, 2023 Department Director Approval: ❑ Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ® admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Admin Report — 2023 State Legislative Session Update GOVERNING LEGISLATION: N/A PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Adoption of Amended State Legislative Agenda, December 20, 2022 BACKGROUND: Briahna Murray of Gordon Thomas Honeywell will present an update on the 2023 Legislative Session that commenced on January 9 and adjourned on April 23, 2023. No legislation was passed in the regular session to address the Blake Decision regarding controlled substances, so the update will also include a debrief on the Special Session held on May 16, 2023 to address that subject. Ms. Murray will also review how well the City fared in accomplishing items on its 2023 State Legislative Agenda. OPTIONS: Discussion RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Discussion BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: N/A STAFF CONTACT: Virginia Clough, Legislative Policy Coordinator and Briahna Murray, Gordon Thomas Honeywell. ATTACHMENTS: PowerPoint Presentation; 2023 Legislative Report (End of Session); Adopted City of Spokane Valley 2023 State Legislative Agenda CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY 2023 LEGISLATIVE SESSION Briahna Murray State Lobbyist, Partner GORDON THOMAS HONEYWELL GOVERNMENT RELATIONS IIMUMOI a-, liTh Overview of the Policy 2023 Legislative Top Priorities Statements Session ri Next Steps OVERVIEW OF 2023 LEGISLATIVE SESSION General Contex • First year of the biennium,105-day session • Committee restructured • 2023-25 operating, capital, and transportation budgets • Major themes: • housing, public safety, behavioral health, and more • 2,156 bills introduced, 485 passed into law Political Contex • 25 new legislators • Democrat majorities • Special session 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0 2019 2021 2023 ■ Bills Introduced Bills Passed IN OVERVIEW OF 2023 LEGISLATIVE SESSION: BUDGETS • Funds state agencies, K-I2 and higher education • $69.8 billion total budget, $3.6 billion in reserves • No tax increases • Funds public and nonprofit construction projects (excluding transportation) • $9 billion total budget Transportation • $13.5 billion budget • Implementation of 2015 Connecting Washington and 2022 Move Ahead Washington • Revenues continue to decline • Governor disapproves of final budget. LEGISLATIVE PRIORITY GRANT FUNDING FOR GREENACRES PARK PHASE 2 Adds a tennis court, pickleball courts, basketball courts, a community garden, and more. $500,000 through Washington Wildlife and Recreation Program; ranked 7 of 59 projects $1 million through Land Water Conservation Fund, ranked 11 of 25 Both grants funded in the final 2023-25 Capital Budget GREENACRES ARK LEGISLATIVE PRIORITY PERFORMING ARTS 59,000 square -foot performing arts center with a 475-seat main stage, 200-seat studio theater, meeting space, and more $1,175,808 grant from the Youth Recreational Facilities $1,848,577 grant from the Building for the Arts Program Both grants fully funded in the final 2023-25 Capital budget LEGISLATIVE PRIORITY AVISTA STADIUM Coalition of publicly -owned stadiums requesting state investment $24 million allocated to stadiums statewide $5.8 million allocated to Avista Stadium $750,000 from Expo Center repurposed: $207,000 forVeterans Memorial Balfour Park $543,000 forAvista Stadium SOUTH BARKER CORRIDOR PROJECT The Legislature evaluated and made modifications to the Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board (FMSIB), and allocated funding to a new list of projects. $3 million was allocated, via FMSIB, to the South Barker Road Corridor Improvements. POLICY STATEMENT PUBLIC SAFETY SB 5352 —Vehicular Pursuits Reasonable suspicion for a violent offense, a sex offense, a vehicular assault offense, an escape offense, driving under the influence, or a domestic violence assault offense. The pursuit must be necessary for the purpose of identifying or apprehending the person, and the fleeing person must pose a serious risk of harm to others. Considered, but did not adopt, amendment to expand to auto theft SB 5536 — Possession of Controlled Substances Gross misdemeanor, punishable up to 180 days for first two offenses; 364 days on subsequent offenses. Alternative response team investments Basic law enforcement academy investments POLICY STATEMENT REMOVE BARRIERS TO HOUSING CONSTRUCTION $1 billion in Housing allocated through the Operating and Capital Budgets Condominium Construction SB 5058 — Condominiums with 12 units or fewer SB 5258 — Construction defect liability POLICY STATEMENT HOUSING/LOCAL CONTROL HB 1 1 10 — Middle Housing Types Cities over 75,000 required to allow 4 units/lot, 6 units/lot if two are affordable Compliance pathways: Alternative pathway i Substantially similar pathways i Building permit requirements HB 1337 —Accessory Dwelling Units HB 1042 — Conversion of Commercial/Mixed-Use to Residential Several permitting bills (HB 1293, SB 5290, SB 5412) POLICY STATEMENT STATE -SHARED REVENUES State -Shared Revenues Fully Funded Liquor Revolving Account (liquor profits): $98.9 million (same) Liquor Excise Account (liquor taxes): $89.4 million (increase of $2. I million) Cannabis Excise Tax: $50.5 million (increase of $4.9 million) Municipal Criminal Justice Assistance Account: $51.2 million (increase of $6 million) HB 1425 —Annexation Sales Tax Credit Thank the City's legislative delegation Interim Work & Preparing for the next session Legislation not passed in 2023 carries over to 2024 2024 Legislative Session begins January 8th QUESTIONS? Briahna Murray Cell: (253) 310-5477 Email: bmurray@gth-gov.com GORDON THOMAS HONEYWELL GOVERNMENT RELATIONS City of Spokane Valley 2023 Legislative Session Report May 30, 2023 Overview of the 2023 Legislative Session The 2023 Legislature convened for a 105-day session that was conducted in person for the first time since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. This year's session was the first of the two-year legislative cycle, and legislators were keen to resume their policymaking work at the Capitol campus. The 2022 November elections resulted in strong Democrat majorities, and 25 new "freshman" legislators. The House of Representatives had 58 democrats, and 40 republicans, while the State Senate had 29 democrats and 20 republicans. Being the majority party, Democrats set the agenda, calling the 2023 session "the year of housing." Democrats also noted priorities of continuing efforts to address climate change, public safety, behavioral health workforce, and special education funding. As the first year of the legislative biennium, the Legislature established new committee structures, committee chairs, and selected new leadership. Notably, the House of Representatives adjusted which legislation would be considered by the Housing and Local Government Committees, directing land use policy that impacts housing construction to the Housing Committee, rather than the Local Government Committee. Several other committee adjustments were made, all of which contributed to the advancement of issues through the legislative process. A total of 2,156 pieces of legislation were introduced this session, and the Legislature approved 485 bills. The Legislature also enacted the Capital, Operating, and Transportation budgets for the 2023-25 biennium. One of the most debated issues of the legislative session was a statewide policy on the possession of controlled substances. The issue remained unresolved through the regular 105-day session. On the final evening of the legislative session, the House of GTH-GOV 1 Representatives debated a compromise version of SB 5536 sponsored by Senator June Robinson (D- 38th LD), concerning possession of controlled substances. The bill did not pass, and Washington's current law on drug possession is set to expire at the end of June. Governor Inslee called for a special session of the Legislature, which convened on May 16th to give lawmakers another opportunity to set forth a statewide policy before the current statute expires. The Legislature met in a one -day session and adopted a final version of the bill making possession of controlled substances a gross misdemeanor, subject to a sentence of up to 180 days, with strong encouragement for pre-trial diversion. A summary of the agreement is under the Public Safety section of this report. The Association of Washington Cities (AWC) has provided a summary of legislative action related to the AWC priorities, available on the AWC website. Budget Summaries One of the Legislature's most significant actions is approving Washington State's three biennial budgets: the operating budget, capital budget, and transportation budget. The Governor recommends and the Legislature modifies and adopts final versions of the biennial budgets. The adopted budgets are effective July 1, 2023 to June 30, 2025. The budgets will be modified mid -biennium when the Legislature convenes for a short 60- day session in 2024. Below is a summary of the final 2023-25 operating, capital, and transportation budgets adopted by the Legislature. 2023-25 Biennial Operating Budget The state's Operating budget funds all state agency operations, including K-12 education, higher education, human service programs, and more. For cities, this budget also funds state -shared revenues, such as the liquor revolving account, the city -county assistance account, etc. that directly distribute revenue to the city budget. The 2023-25 biennial Operating budget appropriates $69.8 billion, a net increase of $2.4 billion from the 2021-23 budget. An ending fund balance of $1.4 billion in general funds is projected for the 2023-25 biennium, and total reserves are projected at $3.6 billion. The Legislature considered the changing fiscal environment in developing the biennial Operating budget. Federal funding streams that were temporarily enhanced due to the COVID-19 pandemic are beginning to phase out as the declaration of federal public health emergency expires on May 11th. Inflation and forecasts indicating slower than average revenue growth over the next two biennia also factored into the budget considerations. GTH-GOV 2 The Operating budget makes significant investment in the K-12 education system, higher education, behavioral health, health care, long-term care, child welfare, carbon reduction, public safety, and housing and homelessness supports. All state -shared revenue accounts with cities are fully funded. Highlights of investments related to local governments include: Public Safety • $3.4 million for six additional Basic Law Enforcement Training Academy (BLEA) classes, for a total of 23 classes in both 2024 and 2025 • $11.3 million for six additional BLEA classes beginning in 2024 at three new regional training academies (Pasco, Skagit County, and Clark County) • $3 million for grants to local law enforcement for vehicle pursuit management technology • $5.3 million for cities and counties to assist with alternative response team programs • $115.8 million to assist with vacating and resentencing under the State v. Blake decision and refunding legal financial obligations • $29.6 million for therapeutic courts Behavioral Health • $108.7 million for forensic mental health and continued implementation of the Trueblood settlement • $21.5 million for crisis triage, relief, or stabilization centers • $44 million for the recovery navigator program • $44.4 million for behavioral health mobile crisis response teams • $69.3 million for 988 crisis response Housing and Homelessness • $150 million for the new Covenant Homeownership Program • $150 million to transition individuals living in encampments to housing • $130 million for the Housing and Essential Needs program • $111 million for emergency housing and rental assistance Climate and Energy • $138 million for community electric vehicle charging infrastructure • $10 million to support municipalities in siting and permitting clean energy projects • $6 million to increase capacity for urban forestry programs GTH-GOV 3 • $35 million for utility assistance through the existing low-income home energy assistance program (LIHEAP) network 2023-25 Biennial Capital Budget The Capital budget funds brick -and -mortar construction, excluding transportation. The 2023-25 biennial Capital Budget authorizes total expenditures of $9 billion. Of this amount, $4.7 billion is financed with general obligation bonds. Additionally, $95.4 million in bond capacity is reserved for a supplemental capital budget. The Capital budget reappropriates $7.6 billion for projects that were previously authorized but not yet completed. Housing • $400 million for the Housing Trust Fund • $60 million for Connecting Homes to Infrastructure program (CHIP) grants to local governments • $50 million to match private investment for grants to support transit -oriented development Behavioral health • $211 million for behavioral health capacity grants, including $133 million for 18 projects across the state that will provide regional behavioral health and substance use services. Infrastructure and Built Environment • $400 million for the Public Works Assistance Account • $68 million for the Stormwater Financial Assistance program • $115 million for Remedial Action Grants • $670 million for the Water Pollution Control Revolving Loan program • $25 million for the Community Economic Revitalization Board • $200 million for broadband grants and loans • $95 million for Salmon Recovery Funding Board grants and $25 million for riparian area grants • $120 million for the Washington Wildlife and Recreation program • $48.4 million for the Fish Barrier Removal Board • $150 million for various clean energy and energy efficiency efforts 2023-25 Biennial Transportation Budget The Transportation budget funds capital facilities investments as well as operating programs for the transportation system in the state. The budget includes total appropriations of approximately $13.5 billion, including approximately $970 million in Climate Commitment Act funding. CCA funds are GTH-GOV 4 appropriated to support carbon -reducing projects and programs, such as multi -modal facilities, public transit, and transportation electrification efforts. Highlights of importance for local governments include: • $1 billion for fish passage • $287 million for the Transportation Improvement Board, including $14.6 million for Complete Streets grants and $9 million in preservation funding for cities • $70.8 million for Safe Routes to Schools grants • $72.2 million for Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety programs • $45.7 million for the Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board • $11.5 million to address homeless encampments within state-owned rights -of - way in coordination with local governments The 2023-25 Transportation budget also modified the phasing for many projects included in the 16-year Move Ahead Washington transportation package passed by the Legislature in 2022. The updated project list can be viewed here. For additional detail on aspects of the three biennial budgets relevant to local governments, refer to the Association of Washington Cities budget matrix. Legislative Agenda Items Spokane Valley Capital Budget Items The 2023-25 Capital Budget includes the following items for the City of Spokane Valley: • $750,000 that was previously allocated to the Expo Center is repurposed/reappropriated to $543,000 for Avista Stadium and $207,000 for Veterans Memorial Balfour Park • Greenacres Park is allocated $500,000 through WWRP-Local Parks, and $1 million through the Land Water Conservation Fund. • The Spokane Valley Performing Arts Center is appropriated $1.849 million through Building for the Arts and $1.17 million through the Youth Recreational Facilities. • $5.8 million is allocated to the Avista Stadium as part of a $24 million appropriation to publicly owned stadiums throughout the state. • $20,000 is allocated to ADA For Northwest Center Janitorial • $750,000 is allocated to Spokane Scale House Market Spokane Valley Transportation Budget Items Generally, the 2023-25 Transportation Budget did not allocate funding to new projects. The 2023-25 Transportation honored on -time delivery schedules for projects funding in GTH-GOV 5 the 2015 Connecting Washington Transportation package, including completion of the North -South Spokane Corridor (NSC). However, the Legislature did fund a new list of Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board projects, which includes a $3 million appropriation for the South Barker Road Corridor Improvements. Public Safety The Legislature grappled with controversial policies in the public safety arena that were outstanding from the 2021 legislative session. The primary issues were police officer vehicular pursuits and new legislation in response to the State v. Blake Supreme Court decision, which struck down Washington's law on possession of controlled substances as unconstitutional. The latter issue presented an especially urgent matter for the Legislature, as the 2021 law classifying possession of controlled substances as a misdemeanor is set to expire at the end of June 2023. Vehicular Pursuits: In 2021, the Legislature passed legislation requiring an office to have probable cause, rather than reasonable suspicion, to engage in a vehicular pursuit. Law enforcement agencies expressed concern about this higher threshold and continued to do so, prompting follow-up legislation in the 2022 session to restore the standard of reasonable suspicion. The policy was not supported by police reform advocates and did not pass during the short session. Policy dialogue around the vehicular pursuits issue continued to be contentious this session. The Washington Association of Sheriffs and Police Chiefs and many local governments advocated for restoration of the reasonable suspicion standard, citing examples of individuals who had eluded police apprehension since the 2021 law went into effect. Police reform advocates held the position that vehicular pursuits represent a danger to the public and noted that the number of people injured or killed from vehicular pursuits has decreased since 2021. The Chair of the Senate Law and Justice Committee refused to hold a hearing on ESB 5352 sponsored by Senator John Lovick (D- 44th LD), out of concern that reverting back to the reasonable suspicion threshold would result in more dangerous pursuits. Senate Bill 5352 was ultimately passed by the Legislature, its forward progress aided by a suspension of the rules in the Senate that brought the bill up for floor debate just in time for the house -of -origin cutoff. As approved by the Legislature, the bill lowers the evidentiary threshold for engagement in vehicular pursuits from probable cause to reasonable suspicion for specific crimes: a violent offense, a sex offense, a vehicular assault offense, an escape offense, driving under the influence, or a domestic violence assault offense. The pursuit must be necessary for the purpose of identifying or GTH-GOV 6 apprehending the person, and the fleeing person must pose a serious risk of harm to others. Proposals establishing a work group on the vehicular pursuits issue were also introduced and considered this session but did not pass. SB 5533 sponsored by Senator John Lovick (D- 44th LD), would have directed the Criminal Justice Training Commission (CJTC) to convene a work group to develop a model vehicle pursuit policy and establish a grant program for modern vehicle pursuit technology. HB 1586 sponsored by Representative Roger Goodman (D- 45th LD), would have directed the CJTC to convene a work group to develop legislative policy recommendations on vehicular pursuits and establish a grant program like what was proposed in SB 5533. While the Legislature did not approve either of these bills, $3 million was appropriated in the 2023-25 Operating budget to fund a law enforcement technology grant program for modern vehicle pursuit management technology. Possession of Controlled Substances The Senate took the lead on introducing policy approaches to the possession of controlled substances issue. Four proposals were introduced, and all would have repealed the current statute classifying drug possession as a misdemeanor and requiring law enforcement to make referrals to substance use assessment and treatment on two occasions before charges may be filed. Aside from that common thread, the four bills differed in their perspectives on how the offense should be classified and handled through the justice system. SB 5035 sponsored by Senator Mike Padden (R- 4th LD) would have classified possession of a controlled substance as a class C felony. SB 5467 sponsored by Senator Jesse Salomon (D- 32nd LD) would have classified drug possession as a gross misdemeanor and focused on directing individuals toward treatment in lieu of jail. SB 5624 sponsored by Senator Manka Dhingra (D- 45th LD) would have enacted the recommendations of the Substance Use and Recovery Services Advisory Committee, decriminalizing possession of a personal amount of controlled substances. Another bill, SB 5536 sponsored by Senator June Robinson (D- 38th LD), was chosen to advance in the legislative process. As passed by the Senate, the bill classified possession of controlled substances as a gross misdemeanor and contained provisions outlining the procedure for pretrial diversion and vacation of convictions. The bill passed the Senate by a narrow margin of 28-21, with a bipartisan mix of votes on both sides of the tally. In the House, the bill was amended to reduce the crime of possession down to a simple misdemeanor, which carries a sentence of up to 90 days in jail, rather than the gross misdemeanor sentence of up to 364 days. The House version also added the GTH-GOV 7 crime of drug use in a public place as a misdemeanor. The House passed the bill 54-41, with a few Democrats joining the Republicans in voting against it. The Senate refused to concur with the House's amendments, so the bill then went to conference. The conference committee's recommendation went back to classifying possession as a gross misdemeanor as passed by the Senate, with the addition of classifying use in a public place as a gross misdemeanor as passed by the House. The bill was brought up for floor debate in the House on the final evening of the legislative session. The conference committee's recommendation was defeated by a vote of 43-55, with 15 Democrats joining the Republicans in opposing the bill. Governor Inslee called for a special session, which convened on May 16th to make an effort at approving a different version of the bill. The Legislature approved, with bi-partisan support, a version of the bill that does the following: • Possession is a gross misdemeanor. Use in a public place is a gross misdemeanor and use is defined as ingesting, inhaling, injecting, or introducing a substance to the human body by any other means. Both are subject to a sentence up to 180 days, a fine no more than $1,000, or both. If a defendant has 2 or more prior convictions, they may be sentenced up to 364 days, fined up to $1,000, or both. • Diversion by prosecutors and law enforcement is encouraged, not required. The bill is ambivalent on diversion method — law enforcement assisted diversion (LEAD), recovery navigator program (RNP), or an arrest and jail alternative program. • The Court may only grant motions for diversion if the prosecuting attorney agrees. The prosecuting attorney may divert additional charges related to substance use disorder for nonfelony offenses that are not crimes against people. • If the prosecutor agrees, the court must approve the defendant's request for diversion if they (1) have no criminal convictions after the effective date of the bill; and (2) are only charged with possession or use, and not charged with other crimes. Unless this criterion is met, the court has discretion as to whether to approve the pre-trial diversion (even if the prosecutor agrees to it). • Individuals must substantially comply with treatment for 12 months or by completing recommended treatment/services, whichever comes first. • Local governments are preempted on regulating drug paraphernalia outside of harm reduction programs. This essentially makes possession of drug paraphernalia (syringes, pipes, etc.) legal. Selling and delivery and use of drug paraphernalia remains a misdemeanor under RCW 69.50.412. GTH-GOV 8 • Opioid treatment programs, recovery residences, substance use disorder treatment facilities, and harm reduction programs, including safe injection sites, are added to the list of essential public facilities. • Grant program for LEAD is established and funded at $5 million for the biennium. A side -by -side comparison of the House, Senate, conference committee, and special session striker versions of the bill can be viewed here. Remove Barriers to the Construction of Housing/Local Control over Land Use Enacting policies and budgets that meaningfully address the housing shortage was a top priority for the Legislature this session. Policy makers were guided by a report by the Department of Commerce stating that Washington State needs about one million additional homes by 2044 to adequately accommodate projected population growth. Of those one million homes, approximately 525,000 of those units need to be either affordable to households at or below 50 percent of area median income or affordable to extremely low-income households. Legislators cited these data points in committee hearings throughout the legislative process to underscore the urgent need for housing policy solutions. Funding The Legislature considered several ways to increase funding for housing. Governor Inslee introduced a proposal to ask Washington State voters to approve a bond measure to generate $4 billion for affordable housing and other types of housing to address homelessness over a six -year period (SB 5202 and HB 1149). The Washington State Treasurer, Mike Pellicciotti criticized the proposal as potentially have a negative impact on the state's credit rating. Other legislators expressed concerns that voters may not approve a bond measure. The Legislature also considered HB 1628, which would have increased state real estate excise tax revenues and would have authorized local jurisdictions to impose a .25% real estate excise tax to fund affordable housing. Washington State Realtors and other stakeholders strongly opposed this proposal and lobbied heavily against it. Both revenue concepts were given serious consideration, but the Legislature inevitably chose not to advance either proposal. Instead, legislators chose to increase its support for housing through $1 billion in budget appropriations in the 2023-25 operating and capital budgets and passed several policy bills to respond to the housing shortage. Policy Bills: GTH-GOV 9 In addition to allocating significant funding to housing, several dozen housing bills passed into law — many intersecting with land use planning and permitting processes. Here are those bills that passed into law in this space: • Reducing Barriers to Condominium Construction: For several sessions, legislators have desired to enact policies to reduce barriers to condominium construction. Condominiums are seen as being an entry to homeownership, and a way for seniors to move to smaller living environments. In 2019, the Legislature adopted SB 5334 making changes to the Washington State Condominium Act; however, since then, Washington State has not experienced a significant increase in the construction of condominiums. In 2023, the Legislature passed two bills that build on the previous work in a subsequent effort to spur condominium construction. SB 5058 sponsored by Senator Mike Padden (R- 4th LD), exempts buildings with 12 or fewer units that are no more than two stories from several requirements specific to building enclosure regulations, and E2SSB 5258 sponsored by Senator Sharon Shewmake (D- 42nd LD) contains several provisions aimed at boosting construction and homeownership of condominiums and townhomes including changes to construction defect claims, deposits for purchase, warranty insurance, real estate excise taxes/downpayment assistance, impact fees, and approval of short plats and short subdivisions. Notably, it requires impact fee schedules to reflect the proportionate impact of new housing units, including multifamily and condominium units, based on the square footage, number of bedrooms, or trips generated, in the housing unit and to produce a proportionally lower impact fee for small housing units. • Middle housing types: E2SHB 1110 sponsored by Representative Jessica Bateman (D- 22nd LD) requires cities to authorize minimum housing development densities in residential zones depending on their population size, ranging from a minimum of two to at least six units per lot. The bill provides an alternative to the density requirements by allowing cities to implement the requirements in at least 75 percent of lots zoned single-family if the remaining portion of lots meet certain criteria. Under the alternative density option, any areas at high risk of displacement may be excluded from the 75 percent of lots subject to minimum density requirements. Cities may allow accessory dwelling units to achieve the unit density required and can limit the areas subject to the density requirements in accordance with water supply capacity. Cities may apply objective development regulations currently applied to single-family residences in accordance with existing ordinances intended to protect critical areas and public health. The City of Spokane Valley opposed this bill throughout the legislative process, but also identified opportunities to amend the bill to address unintended GTH-GOV 10 consequences and reduce the impact of the bill on the Spokane Valley community. The alternative compliance pathway and many other provisions are included in the bill. The Operating budget appropriates $2 million for grants to implement the bill. • Accessory Dwelling Unit regulations: EHB 1337 sponsored by Representative Mia Gregerson (D- 33rd LD) requires cities and counties planning under the Growth Management Act to allow the construction of at least two accessory dwelling units (ADUs) per lot within urban growth areas. Local governments are prohibited from imposing certain regulations or restrictions on ADU construction, including gross floor area requirements and roof height limits. The bill prohibits owner -occupancy requirements as well as off-street parking requirements within one-half mile walking distance of a major transit stop. • Streamlining development regulations: ESHB 1293 sponsored by Representative Mark Klicker (R- 16th LD), which requires cities and counties planning under the Growth Management Act (GMA) to apply only clear and objective design review standards to the exterior of new development, except for designated landmarks or historical districts. The bill clarifies project review provisions and adds expedited review of project permit applications that include affordable housing. In addition to the bills noted above, the Legislature considered several proposals concerning development regulations and local government permitting. In the latter category, HB 1401 sponsored by Representative Cyndy Jacobsen (R- 25th LD) would have provided that local governments could adopt expedited permitting processes for housing, while HB 1611 sponsored by Representative Julia Reed (D- 36th LD) and HB 1519 sponsored by Representative Andrew Barkis (R- 2nd LD) would have modified the requirements for applicant notification regarding completeness of permit applications. Ultimately, none of these proposals were passed into law. • Use of existing buildings for residential purposes: ESHB 1042 sponsored by Representative Amy Walen (D- 48th LD) prohibits cities from imposing certain restrictions on existing buildings zoned for commercial or mixed use. Cities must allow the addition of housing units at a density up to 50 percent more than what is allowed in the underlying zone if built entirely within the building's envelope and cannot impose additional parking requirements. Cities may not prohibit the addition of housing units in any specific part of a building except ground floor commercial retail spaces along a major pedestrian corridor. The bill advanced GTH-GOV 11 quickly in its house of origin despite concerns raised by local governments regarding provisions contained in the original draft. The Senate amended the bill to address many of the concerns. • SEPA exemption for housing: 2SSB 5412 sponsored by Senator Jesse Salomon (D- 32nd LD) expands the infill development categorical exemption from the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) to include housing development. All project actions that propose to develop residential housing units within the incorporated portions of urban growth areas or middle housing within the unincorporated areas of urban growth areas are categorically exempt from SEPA. Before adopting the categorical exemptions, jurisdictions must satisfy certain criteria, including that the development is consistent with development regulations under the comprehensive plan and that the city or county has prepared an environmental analysis that considers the proposed use or intensity of use in the area and that analysis has been conducted regarding multi -modal transportation impacts. The Operating budget appropriates $20 million for grants to assist with updating comprehensive plans, including the requirements contained in this bill. • Consolidating local permit review processes: 2SSB 5290 sponsored by Sen. Mark Mullet (D- 5th LD), requested by the Governor's Office, establishes a consolidated permit review program for local governments to issue final decisions for residential permit applications within specified time frames. Local governments are required to exempt project permits for interior alterations from site plan review under certain conditions. The bill requires local governments to refund a proportion of the permit fees if they have not issued a final decision by the established time period. The requirements take effect after January 1, 2025. A grant program is established in the legislation to support local governments' transition from paper to digital permit filing systems. The Operating budget provides $3 million for grants to assist local governments with implementation of the bill. Additionally, there are several bills that were considered that did not advance in 2023 that will likely be revisited in 2024: • SB 5466 sponsored by Senator Marko Liias (D- 21st LD), would have required cities planning under the Growth Management Act to allow multi -family housing projects within transit station areas to be developed at transit -oriented density maximum floor area ratios. The bill was introduced at the request of the Governor's Office and Amazon. Local governments held mixed perspectives on GTH-GOV 12 the bill. Some were supportive of its policy goals while others expressed concern about the floor area ratios and potentially broad application based on the many types and frequencies of public transit service as outlined in the original draft. The City of Spokane Valley expressed opposition to the proposal, and inevitably was successful in getting the bill amended so that it would not apply to areas surrounding bus rapid transit, and therefore, would not apply in the City of Spokane Valley. The bill was amended late in the process to include an affordability requirement for housing development that did not receive broad support from the construction and real estate industries, which had been supportive of the legislation. A compromise to address stakeholder's diverging perspectives on the bill could not be reached by the time the Legislature adjourned. It's likely this bill will be brought back and discussed in the 2024 legislative session. • HB 1245 sponsored by Representative Andrew Barkis (R- 2nd LD), would have required cities planning under the Growth Management Act to allow the splitting of a single residential lot into two residential lots. While there was momentum behind this legislation as a viable tool to foster more infill residential development, it was unclear how the policy would interact with the middle housing and accessory dwelling unit bills. As a result, the Legislature chose not to advance the bill. Tax Relief Ultimately the Legislature chose not to advance proposals to increase taxes/generate new revenue either through an adjustment to the property tax levy, nor through an increase in real estate excise taxes. A proposal sponsored by Senator Lynda Wilson (R- 17t" LD) that would have established a homestead property tax exemption and renter's credit subject to approval by the voters of a constitutional amendment was heard in the Senate Ways and Means Committee but did not advance. Protect and Restore State -Shared Revenues The enacted 2023-25 Operating budget maintains or increases the amounts of state - shared revenues compared to the current biennium. • Liquor Revolving Account (liquor profits): $98.9 million (same) • Liquor Excise Account (liquor taxes): $89.4 million (increase of $2.1 million) • Cannabis Excise Tax: $50.5 million (increase of $4.9 million) • Municipal Criminal Justice Assistance Account: $51.2 million (increase of $6 million) GTH-GOV 13 Growth Management Act Policies The final Operating budget includes $20 million for updating comprehensive plans and $6 million for grants and technical assistance for planning efforts related to housing supply. Climate change in comprehensive planning: E2SHB 1181 sponsored by Rep. Davina Duerr (D-1st LD), is Governor -requested legislation that amends the Growth Management Act to add a goal of climate change and resiliency to the list of elements required in comprehensive plans. It requires jurisdictions to identify actions to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and vehicle miles traveled. The policy for integrating climate change into the Growth Management Act has been introduced in previous legislative sessions but did not make it to the finish line. The bill's provisions were refined over time through stakeholder engagement until it reached its final form. Although the building industry still had reservations about the bill, it was able to build enough support to finally pass this session. The Operating budget provides $41 million for grants to assist with implementation. Finance Incentivizing annexation of unincorporated urban growth areas: 2SHB 1425 sponsored by Representative April Berg (D- 44th LD) re -authorizes the credit against the state sales tax as an incentive for cities to annex unincorporated areas within their urban growth areas. The prior requirements in state statute that a city be within a county with a population of at least 600,000 and that an annexation area have a population of at least 10,000 are removed through this bill. To impose the tax, a city must have entered into an interlocal agreement with the county. The maximum levy amount that may be imposed is 0.1 percent for annexed areas with populations between 2,000 and 10,000, and 0.2 percent for annexed areas with a population size above 10,000. Cities may not begin to impose the tax after July 1, 2028. GTH-GOV 14 Spokane _CValley 2023 State Legislative Agenda 10210 E Sprague Avenue • Spokane Valley WA 99206 Phone: (509) 720-5000 • Fax: (509) 720-5075 • www.spokanevalley.org FUNDING REQUEST Grant Funding for Greenacres Park Phase 2: The City of Spokane Valley requests that the Legislature fund the following two grants for Phase 2 of Greenacres Park: 1) Washington Wildlife and Recreation Program (WWRP — local parks) grant award for $500,000, ranked number 7 of 59 projects; and 2) Land Water Conservation Fund (LWCF) grant award of $1 million ranked number 11 of 25 projects. This project will expand the park to add a tennis court, six pickleball courts, basketball courts, a community garden, shade structure and shade trees, a new backstop, and more parking spaces to meet demand. This phase will also expand the existing playground and splash pad, renovate the disc golf course with a new a practice green and 3-hole introductory course, and pave the existing perimeter path. SUPPORT REQUESTS Support for Grants Awarded to the Performing Arts Center: The City requests support from the Legislature to fully fund: 1) a $1,175,808 grant from the Youth Recreational Facilities (YRF) program; and 2) a $1,848,577 grant from the Building for the Arts program for a performing arts center in Spokane Valley. These state grant awards will match private contributions to fund a state -of -the art 59,000 square -foot performing arts center housing a 475-seat main stage, 200-seat flexible studio theater, acting conservatory for area youth and event and business meeting space. Support for Minor League Baseball Stadiums: The City of Spokane Valley joins communities throughout the State to request $24 million to upgrade publicly owned stadiums, including Avista Stadium. State funding will be paired with local funding to upgrade stadiums throughout the state to allow minor league baseball to maintain its strong presence in Washington. POLICY STATEMENTS • Public safety is the City Council's highest priority. The Spokane Valley City Council and its residents support a commonsense and meaningful approach to public safety policies that protect lives and property and do not erode trust in government. Examples include: • Make possession of controlled substances an arrestable offense, preferably a felony, and increase funding for substance use treatment programs. • Re-establish a reasonable suspicion standard for when officers engage in vehicular pursuits. • Increase investments in alternative response teams, such as the City's behavioral health and homeless outreach co -responder models. • Increase resources to hire, train, and protect law enforcement officers. Spokane ` 2023 State Legislative Agenda Valley 10210 E Sprague Avenue • Spokane Valley WA 99206 Phone: (509) 720-5000 • Fax: (509) 720-5075 • www.spokanevalley.org POLICY STATEMENTS CONTINUED MOVE BARRIERS TO THE CONSTRUCTIO F HOUSIN In 2020, the City of Spokane Valley amended its zoning codes to allow high density residential structures within one-half mile of frequent transit stops. Additionally, duplexes and accessory dwelling units are allowed in many residential areas. The City calls on the state to remove other barriers to the construction of housing, including but not limited to: • Revise condominium liability regulations. • Evaluate the impact of the state energy and building codes on the cost of construction. • Provide tax incentives. AMEND STATE LAW REGARDING MUNICIPAL UTILITY TAXING AUTHORITY The City of Spokane Valley requests that the Legislature clarify the conditions under which it is legal for a municipality to impose utility taxes on revenues from a county wastewater treatment system. TAX RELIEF The City of Spokane Valley calls on the Legislature to provide relief to Washington's taxpayers, as provided in other states. ' IZ�k\A_111KNALONEIMaLLWAJ1lV[I]►iYM' • A foundational belief for the Spokane Valley City Council and the citizens they represent is that the most effective level of government is the one closest to the people. As such, the Council urges the Legislature to respect local decision -making. Some examples include management of right-of-way and land use decisions. .ROTECT AND RESTORE LOCAL STATE-SHA._RE,LEVENUES The City of Spokane Valley requests that the Legislature protect and enhance local state -shared revenues to allow the City to deliver vital services to its residents. These funds include the Liquor Excise Tax Account, Liquor Board Profits, Municipal Criminal Justice Assistance Account, City -County Assistance Account, and Marijuana Revenues. ROWTH MANAGEMENT ACT POLICIENMEML The City of Spokane Valley will monitor proposals to make changes to the Growth Management Act and supports proposals that honor local democracy and enhance the City's role in the planning process. The City encourages the state to allocate adequate funding to cities to effectively implement planning directives from the state. The City supports AWC legislative agenda items that serve the best interests of Spokane Valley. CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: May 30, 2023 Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ information ® admin. report AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Library District Update GOVERNING LEGISLATION: PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Department Director Approval: ❑ ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session BACKGROUND: Mr. Patrick Roewe, Spokane County Library District Executive Director, will give an update on the status of the Library. OPTIONS: Discussion RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Discussion BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: n/a STAFF CONTACT: John Hohman ATTACHMENTS: PowerPoint SCLD New Spokane Valley Library Update Spokane Valley City Council 05.30.2023 Mr.....,0111 NUN. !Pi 111. .5 irg IT r Ted _SCLD Project Timeline • 2012 • City of Spokane Valley (City) purchased 8.26-acre property for Balfour Park expansion • Spokane County Library District (District) purchased 2.82 acres of the property for a new Spokane Valley Library • Interlocal agreement - if District fails to secure bond funding, City has option to buy back the land at the original purchase price after 5 years • 2014 • Spokane Valley Library Capital Facility Area (SVLCFA) and bond on April ballot • Formation of SVLCFA successful • Bond fails with 55% approval — Does not reach 60% supermajority approval 2015 • Second attempt to fund the SVLCFA on August ballot • 57% approval the issue failed to receive a supermajority - SVLCFA dissolved • 2017 • Interlocal agreement is extended 5 years • City commits to contribute funds to joint site amenities to be used by future park and library users SCLD Project Timeline • 2020 • District develops funding plan for new library that does not require a bond vote • 2021 • District selects and begins work with Integrus Architecture for library design • Interlocal Agreement amended - no longer references bond funding • 2022 • Project goes to bid; contract awarded to Kilgore Construction Inc. • Construction commences • The Library Foundation of Spokane County launches a capital campaign to support the new construction • Naming rights and commemorative opportunities offered • 2023 • Substantial completion of construction on May 16 • Punch list and landscaping in progress _SCLD Project Funding • No new taxes • $15 million project • $9 million loan - the Washington State Treasurers LOCAL Program • $2.74 million Library District capital project funds • $2 million Library Capital Improvement Program Grant • Washington State Departmental Commerce • $800,000 City contribution to joint -site area improvements • $254,000 City contribution to frontage improvements _SCLD Project Funding • Capital Campaign $460,000 and counting • Naming rights • Diane E. Zahand Community Room • STCU Studio • Smaller donations • Engraved pavers and benches in the plaza and facing the park SCLn Exterior Progress SCLD Interior Progress MEI innimams # ME' 7 r- „ 1. M." pl• ITS' O , , - • NM" 11 fo ; ,Nr• — ' awn _ L1SCLD Interior Progress 1.1111t. 111111111MM! SCLD Key Features • 28,000 square feet • +30% increase in total size and public spaces • Single level, efficient design • Seeking LEED Silver certification as required by state grant • Open floor plan • Designed to adapt to future community needs • Garage for Mobile Services fleet • The District provides county -wide mobile library services to adult care facilities, schools, and rural areas • 100% of items ("70K) moving to new library • Part of the 1.5 millions total items in the District's collection SCLD Key Features • Diane E. Zahand Community Room • 200-person capacity - integrated audio-visual • Reservable by the public • STCU Studio • Fully equipped audio-visual space • Reservable by the public • Bright and inviting children's space • Includes interactive learning areas and family reading spaces • Four unique conference rooms • Various sizes and configurations • Reservable by the public • Computers • Laptops, tablets, copiers, printers, and 3D printers • Walk-in and reservable by the public SCLD Upcoming Key Dates • June 4 • Last day of operations of current facility • June 5 —June 16 • Moving, set-up, and staff orientation • Saturday June 17, 9:30am • Ribbon cutting ceremony • Public openingto follow SCLD Thank you Patrick Roewe, Executive Director proewe@scld.org 509.893.8360 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: May 30, 2023 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ® admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Proposed Homeless Action Plan update GOVERNING LEGISLATION: NA PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Homeless Program Update to Council on September 6, 2022, and on January 3, 2023. Homeless Plan update on February 7, 2023. BACKGROUND: The current draft plan identifies three primary goals, which are in order of priority: 1. Whenever possible, prevent homelessness from initially occurring 2. Reduce levels of existing homelessness; and 3. Improve quality of life. Specific goals or prioritization of strategies will be determined at a later Council meeting, at which time staff will seek direction from the Council to determine how resources should be prioritized and which specific strategies to pursue. 1. Prevent Homelessness Homelessness prevention and diversion is targeted to those members of the public who are at risk of becoming homeless, and focuses on self-sufficiency and stabilization. Considered a national best practice, prevention is far less expensive than providing shelter beds with accompanying services. Additionally, preventing homelessness is a pro -active approach necessary for reducing future levels of homelessness. Any success in preventing homelessness now will pay dividends in the future both for those who are at risk of homelessness, and for the community at large. 2. Reduce Homelessness The second objective of this plan is to reduce current levels of homelessness. Because people experiencing homelessness are impacted by their own unique set of needs and challenges, multiple strategies must be employed simultaneously to achieve this objective. The transition from homelessness to being stably housed can be seen as a continuum, with certain interventions and resources needed in the initial stages of the process, with different resources and interventions needed at later stages. 3. Improve Quality of Life Improving quality of life for those housed and unhoused is the third objective in this plan. Homelessness can create significant adverse impacts for not only those experiencing homelessness, but for the surrounding community as well. Substance abuse, mental and physical health issues, and personal safety are critical issues facing those who are unhoused, while the surrounding community may see increased garbage and litter from encampments, increased crime, and loss of use of community facilities that are being used for encampments. This objective focuses on improving the quality of life and reducing the negative impacts for those experiencing homelessness as well as the surrounding community. Page 1 of 3 Since the last homeless plan update to Council in February, the plan has undergone a number of edits to incorporate feedback and new information. The primary changes are as follows: Point In Time count numbers updated with 2023 totals. The annual PIT count took place in January, and we now have preliminary totals that were used to update the draft plan. This year the PIT found 2,390 individuals experiencing homelessness in our county, up from 1,757 in 2022, which represents a 36% increase year -over -year. Of those experiencing homelessness, 955 were "unsheltered", which is a 16% increase over 2022, and a 76.5% increase since 2020. The PIT count also provides some insight into who is experiencing homelessness, which data may be useful in future efforts to address the issue. For example, 2023 PIT data revealed that while those identifying as American Indian, Alaskan Native or Indigenous make up about 1% of the county's overall population, this group accounts for 7.8% of all those counted during the PIT. This same group was also the only race/ethnicity with more unsheltered homeless than sheltered homeless identified during the count; 6.9% of those counted identified as Black or African American, while only representing about 1.75% of the county's overall population. Data like this should be taken into account when crafting interventions to make sure that the options available are known to and effective in assisting those experiencing homelessness. More granular data about where those who were counted were last housed, is not yet available. During the 2022 PIT count, approximately 13% of the 1,757 respondents indicated they last lived in Spokane Valley before their current episode of homelessness. We will be monitoring additional data as it comes out to better understand the scope and condition of homelessness in Spokane Valley. Stakeholder feedback incorporated. Stakeholder feedback was solicited and received in a variety of ways as the plan was being drafted. A community survey was conducted in 2021, and received 318 responses. The survey was focused on understanding how often residents encounter homelessness, and possible support for a variety of interventions. One key finding from the survey was that about 55% of respondents supported small emergency shelter services (20 people or less) located close to public transit, which was approximately 20 points higher than those who said they did not support such services. When asked about the City's role in addressing homelessness, about 73% of respondents said the City should either "continue to participate in the existing regional system„ or "should partner with the County" to address the problem. Only 25% of respondents indicated they believed the City should "only offer services to those living in the City." In March 2023, a community open house was held to answer questions and solicit feedback and priorities for interventions outlined in the Homeless Plan. Approximately 60+ people attended the open house and provided feedback. Each attendee was given a number of stickers to "vote" by placing stickers next to their preferred interventions. The short-term interventions category garnered the most support, with the creation of a day drop -in center, and mental health/addiction crisis interventions receiving the most votes within that group (46 votes each). The single largest vote -getter was increasing housing availability and affordability (72 votes). About one-third of the total votes in this category (26 votes) were for "Relax[ing] codes to allow for more types of housing in more areas, including off-street parking requirements that increase Page 2 of 3 the cost of new developments." Developing supportive housing options (44 votes) and increasing income (41 votes) were the third and fourth most popular categories of interventions identified. The final strategy for soliciting feedback was direct outreach to key stakeholders asking for their input. The plan was shared with staff of 41 different entities including Spokane Valley Partners, Spokane Valley Police Department, Greater Valley Support Network, Continuum of Care board (including Veterans and Single Adult sub -committees), Family Promise, Reclaim, Hello For Good, Spokane Valley Chamber of Commerce, attendees of the monthly Valley Huddle meeting, and the Homeless Coalition among others. Feedback was received from 14 separate entities, in addition to resident feedback that came through the open house, and by emails and calls. One example of constructive feedback came from SpokAnimal. In conversations with the organization's leadership, it was made clear that a plan to address homelessness needed to include provisions on how to deal with pets for those seeking treatment or housing. From this conversation a new section about pet boarding was added to the current draft plan. Feedback from Volunteers of America helped refine sections of the plan that outline how outreach and case management for youth experiencing homelessness occurs in our system. Feedback from Community Frameworks about the importance of preserving existing affordable units that could be converted into market rate units was added to highlight this particular avenue for action. The feedback from these and other providers was critical in refining the draft plan. Annual goals now include ARPA allocations. Another important addition to the current draft plan is an outline of the Council's ARPA allocations, and how each award fits into the overall focus and strategy on addressing homelessness. This information was added under section G. 2023 Work Plan Activities, as we wanted to make sure to incorporate information about actions being taken now by Council that are related to addressing homelessness in this community. The goal for this evening is to share updated information and edits in the plan, as well as key insights from the stakeholder feedback that has been received. The current draft shows edits that have been made since the last time the plan was brought before Council, to make it easier to identify changes. Additional feedback from Council will inform the next draft of the plan, with the goal of bringing the plan up for adoption by the Council early this summer. OPTIONS: Discussion RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Discussion BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Discussion STAFF CONTACT: Eric Robison, Housing and Homeless Coordinator ATTACHMENTS: PowerPoint; Draft Spokane Valley Homeless Action Plan Page 3 of 3 Spokane Valley Homeless Action Plan Update Eric Robison, Housing and Homeless Coordinator Three Primary Goals of the S.V.H.A.P. 1. Prevent Homelessness • Whenever possible keep people in their homes, or provide rapid one-time interventions to get them housed quickly 2. Reduce Homelessness • Move people living on the streets through the steps needed to achieve and maintain stable housing • Ensure full spectrum of services (such as mental health, addiction, employment, etc.) 3. Improve Quality of Life • Reduce trash, loitering, camps, and other related impacts on the community. • Provide options for the unhoused to meet needs and minimize community impacts Critical Needs Identified in the S.V.H.A.P. • More housing! — especially affordable housing • Needed services located in Spokane Valley • A continuum of options from emergency shelter & services, to transitional housing & employment, to affordable permanent housing Updates to the draft S.V.H.A.P. • PIT numbers from 2023 count • Stakeholder feedback incorporated • ARPA allocations added to 2023 action plan Process for S.V.H.A.P. adoption by Council ✓ Internal reviews and edits ✓ Solicit stakeholder feedback/community meeting • Council feedback • Final revisions/edits prior to presenting for adoption ..S#42> Aiwommior '11C) Ow Aillommor- Questions/Comments? Spokane Valley Homeless Action Plan (SVHAP) Introduction Homelessness is one of the most challenging social issues facing the City of Spokane Valley (the "City"). To significantly prevent and/or reduce homelessness, any community needs to be able to implement a systematic, long-term response that ensures homelessness does not occur in the first place whenever possible or, if it cannot be prevented, is a rare, brief and one-time experience. Homelessness is not unique to the City; however, Spokane Valley does have a distinct character that requires a plan that reflects the City's values and goals. Although there is not one single cause to becoming homeless, some of the more common reasons include a shortage of affordable housing, a lack of adequate or stable income, substance use disorders, mental health concerns, and domestic violence among others. The multiple causes demand a varied response including prevention, diversion, reduction, and enforcement activities. In addition, approaches vary depending upon the types of homelessness. For example, addressing chronic homelessness requires different approaches than situational homelessness. Veterans have unique needs, as do homeless youth or families. Regardless of the reason for becoming homeless, the community's goal is for homelessness to be a rare, brief, and one-time experience, and in the case of chronic homelessness, to move people into shelter and connected to services as quickly as possible. The City recognizes that homelessness is a regional problem, and that all of the region's stakeholders must work together to address it. Coordinating planning, funding, and accountability would improve efficiency, communication, and management. The current system relies on multiple funding sources answering to multiple advisory boards and governing bodies. This approach is confusing and not cost effective for providers that must submit funding applications and outcome reports to a variety of sources, each with its own particular requirements, and results in little or no coordination between service providers. It also creates unnecessary duplication of administrative efforts and can lead to information silos and entities working at cross purposes. In the absence of a truly regional approach, however, the City will continue to plan and direct efforts to address homelessness within our boundaries, while remaining open to approaches that seek to improve broader collaboration and coordination. Furthermore, the City is committed to continuing to work with regional partners through the Continuum of Care board, and on efforts like the annual Point In Time count. This action plan is designed to address homelessness through programs and practices that have proven successful in other places but are tailored for those experiencing homelessness within the City. While the plan outlines a number of strategies, it is not an inclusive list of all programs or interventions that may be needed in the community. The City will support community partners as it is able in providing other important services, recognizing that it is not within the City's ability to fund or manage many of the programs that may be needed in our community. This Plan is intended to be a living document that requires ongoing review and regular updates based on changes in legislation, community priorities, program outcomes, enforcement, and new funding opportunities. Through work with service providers, community members, law enforcement, businesses, County officials, City Council, and City staff, the following principles were developed to guide creation of this action plan: 1 Spokane Valley Homeless Action Plan (SVHAP) • There are many people who are not currently homeless who may be susceptible to becoming homeless due to medical costs, loss of job, change in housing cost, being a victim of abuse, or other significant life events. The City believes that assisting those who are at risk of homelessness is the most effective means of reducing further increases in the number of those experiencing homelessness in the City. Identifying opportunities to keep people housed is the primary focus of the plan. • A shared framework among all stakeholders with a clear plan of action will ensure that the City and service providers are all working cooperatively and collaboratively towards the same goals of preventing and reducing homelessness and improving quality of life for our community. • It is critical that approaches and action developed in this plan are fiscally responsible and sustainable. Further, all approaches and actions developed in this plan must lead to meaningful, measurable outcomes that can be tracked to assess effectiveness at either preventing homelessness, reducing current levels of homelessness, or improving quality of life for our community. • The safety and well-being of the community is a priority, including residents, businesses and their customers, and people experiencing homelessness. • While the City recognizes that an approach that includes both law enforcement and supportive services is essential, the City firmly believes and recognizes that homelessness is not a crime. • Support for long-term solutions that help each person experiencing homelessness find permanent housing with supportive services is critical. • Each person experiencing homelessness is unique with diverse needs requiring a tailored case management approach founded on trust and respect. Some populations are over -represented among those experiencing homelessness, so tailoring interventions to best serve these groups is critical for reducing overall rates of homelessness. • Community awareness and involvement in the initiatives is critical to our success. • Addressing homelessness requires a regional approach and resources, and we will work with regional partners to leverage resources for the City. • Homelessness represents a complex social problem. The plan must be flexible, and we will regularly review outcomes to improve our plan and adapt to changing conditions. Within consideration of the guiding principles above, this action plan consists of three separate but related objectives: A. Preventing homelessness from occurring where possible B. Reducing current levels of homelessness C. Improving the quality of life of residents, including those experiencing homelessness. 2 Spokane Valley Homeless Action Plan (SVHAP) The order of these objectives reflect the City's priorities for action. Because sufficient resources to address each area are not available, the City understands that it needs to set priorities and direct resources to those areas first even as it works to make progress within each objective. The City strongly believes that keeping people in their homes and preventing homelessness from occurring in the first place is a top priority. Assisting those currently experiencing homelessness to transition back to stable housing is the next priority. Making progress on these two objectives will also serve to improve the quality of life for all Spokane Valley residents, as reduced current and future homelessness will reduce impacts of homelessness that are felt by all members of the community. Each of these objectives are supported by a variety of strategies outlined in the plan below. The Plan This plan is a living document that will require regular updates to remain relevant. This is by design. As needs on the ground change, goals are accomplished, and more knowledge is gained from implementation of this plan, it will need to be updated to reflect the changing landscape of homelessness in the City. The intent is to update the plan every five years, in line with the regional Strategic Plan to Prevent and End Homelessness, which is updated on the same timeline. Additionally, the Plan will be the basis for annual goal setting and work -plans as the City seeks to make progress on its goals related to homelessness. A. Prevent Homelessness Homelessness prevention and diversion is targeted to people who are at risk of becoming homeless and focuses on self-sufficiency and stabilization. Considered a national best practice, prevention is far less expensive than providing shelter beds with accompanying services. Additionally, preventing homelessness is a pro -active approach necessary for reducing future levels of homelessness. According to one homeless advocacy organization, children who experience homelessness are more likely to experience homelessness as an adult.' Additionally, children who cxpericncc homelessness and are approximately three times more likely to drop out of school2, five times more likely to be victims of sexual violence, and seven times more likely to attempt suicide than their housed counterparts.3 This means that any success in preventing homelessness now will pay dividends in the future both for those who are at risk of homelessness, and the community at large. A recent county -wide housing stability survey carried out by The Zone received over 1,400 responses. Of those from the county (outside the City of Spokane) who responded 54% said they had taken out a loan to pay rent, 47.8% said they provide financial support to a parent, older child, or other extended family member, and 28% said they have lived with others to make ends meet.4 According to the City's Housing Action Plan, 48% of Spokane Valley's renter households are cost burdened, meaning they pay more than 30% of their total household income for rent. Further, some 25% of Spokane Valley's renter households ' Effects of Homelessness on Families - Invisible People 2 REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE Update: Homeless Student Data 2019 (www.k12.wa.us) 3 Risk and Resilience: Differences in risk factors and health outcomes between homeless and non -homeless students in 2017 YRBS Data Read and full paper: http://bit.ly/SHC-YRBS2018 4 2022 Rental Survey Results (squarespace.com) 3 Spokane Valley Homeless Action Plan (SVHAP) are severely cost burdened, paying more than 50% of their income on rent. These are households that are on the verge of homelessness in many cases. When looking at these numbers it is important to recognize that certain groups are disproportionally represented among renters generally, and among those that are cost burdened or at risk of homelessness specifically. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, the overall homeownership rate for the Spokane area is 62.7%. Breaking that number down by race/ethnicity, we see that while 64.8% of white households are home owners, only 30.5% of black households own their homes. For American Indian/Alaskan Native and Hispanic households, the numbers are in the mid-40s.5 This means that non -white households are much more likely to be rent burdened and at risk of homelessness, which is born out in the data for those who are experiencing homelessness. Any strategies for preventing homelessness from occurring, increasing home ownership rates, or decreasing existing rates of homelessness need to take into account these realities to make sure that interventions are designed to assist those most likely to need help. There are several distinct components to implement that will aid in preventing those not currently homeless from becoming homeless. Increase Housing Availability and Affordability Increasing the availability of housing that Spokane Valley residents can afford is perhaps the most critical improvement the City can make to help reduce homelessness. The correlation between housing affordability to homelessness is well documented.' Without housing that Spokane Valley residents can afford, the upward trend in homelessness will continue. Implementing the strategies recommended in the City's Housing Action Plan (HAP) as quickly as possible to increase housing stock in Spokane Valley is critical to addressing the current housing crisis, and by extension the current homelessness crisis. Shelters, outreach, diversion, and every other component outlined in this plan can only work to reduce homelessness if there are affordable units available for those in need of homes. The HAP identifies strategies that would help to increase the availability of affordable housing for Valley residents. The City is actively pursuing consideration and implementation of recommendations made in the HAP. This process includes input from developers, realtors, contractors, and affordable housing advocates to find consensus and create buy -in for implementation of needed changes to increase the stock of affordable housing in the City. One consideration of the recommendations in the HAP is that the majority include regulatory changes to support more affordable housing such as the "missing middle." o8ptions. "Missing middle" housing includes options between single family homes and apartment buildings, such as duplexes, triplexes, row homes and cottage court housing. These options, once common throughout the United States, provide more affordable e +e+nshousing that can meet a variety of needs, but they are often not compliant with many current zoning regulations. The City may also wish to consider direct funding of affordable housing projects to more timely provide additional affordable housing units, especially if it assumes control of available funding sources. Additionally, the City could require that any new multi -family housing developments set aside a The Black Homeownership Gap in Spokane I Stacker 6 Housing-Affordability-and-Stablility-Brief.pdf (usich.gov); New Research Quantifies the Link Between Housing Affordability and Homelessness - National Alliance to End Homelessness; Homelessness Rises Faster Where Rent Exceeds a Third of Income - Zillow Research; 4 Spokane Valley Homeless Action Plan (SVHAP) percentage of units for Project Based Vouchers (PBV). These housing vouchers administered by the Spokane Housing Authority are tied to a specific unit (as opposed to Section 8 vouchers that travel with the tenant to any unit they my reside in), and guarantee a rent payment up to the Fair Market Rate for the unit's size as determined by HUD. Creating a fund that incentivizes landlords and developers to set aside units that are affordable could be another strategy for increasing availability. This would be in addition to the PBV model discussed above. Requiring that new units remain affordable for people with different incomes can be an effective tool for increasing the stock of units affordable to a variety of households, without the requirements and conditions that can come along with housing vouchers. Similarly, preserving the existing stock of affordable housing is also critical. Many affordable units are bound by time -limited financing agreements, meaning after a certain period the owner can convert affordable units into market -rate units. This can, and has, lead to the displacement of long-time tenants and added to the housing crisis for low -earning households. Identifying housing where affordability covenants may be expiring, and then working with partners to ensure affordability requirement remain in place, is another key strategy to ensuring sufficient housing options for households of all incomes. Measures that make it easier and less expensive for renters to get into units can also help to reduce the barriers those living on limited incomes face when trying to find or maintain stable housing. For example, a universal limited duration background check and application could greatly reduce the cost of applying for housing in a market when multiple applications are often needed before a unit can be secured. For those living on limited or fixed incomes, $30-$50 application fees can quickly become unaffordable, especially when low vacancy rates create intense competition for open units. Funding a program to help tenants pay move -in costs or to provide landlords with additional damage deposit resources could also help low-income renters connect with open units. The Housing and Essential Needs program managed by Goodwill for Spokane County has successfully used payments for double -deposits, move -in incentives, and move -in costs to house individuals that would otherwise have trouble being approved for a unit. But only those who have a disability, meeting income requirements, are not receiving TANF or SSI, and participate in substance use disorder treatment when required are eligible. Further, program funding only covers a portion of those that are eligible, and actual program enrollment is based off a needs assessment that means only those with the most acute needs may get assistance. Washington does have a Landlord Mitigation Fund that serves to help offset risks of damages to landlords'. Advertising this existing program and helping landlords comply with its requirements could be a low-cost way to help reduce barriers for some low-income renters. Fund Payment Assistance and Diversion Programs and Rcntal i tancc Payment assistance programs are one critical tool for preventing homelessness. Payment assistance can take the form of rental assistance, or mortgage assistance for those that may own their home. These time - limited programs can help households weather financial storms that would otherwise result in the loss of housing and potentially result in an eviction, which makes obtaining housing in the future even more difficult. Payment assistance programs can be resource -intensive, but they often cost less than emergency ' Landlord Mitigation Program (wa.gov) 5 Spokane Valley Homeless Action Plan (SVHAP) housing, and they can help households avoid the trauma and life disruptions that can come with homelessness and help households retain much needed assets in the case of mortgage assistance. Rental assistance programs funded by local, state and federal dollars have spent tens of millions of dollars in Spokane county to prevent evictions. Despite the size of this investment, rental assistance programs have not been sufficient to address the need for these resources, leaving many Spokane Valley households that would otherwise be eligible, without this option. According to a survey conducted by The Zone in Spokane that has received over 1,400 responses, 47% of respondents owe back rent, 75% say they are struggling to pay rent now or in the near future, and 56% have already received eviction notices. Diversion is an intervention designed to immediately address the needs of someone who has just lost their housing and become homeless. Diversion is a client -driven approach; Its goal is to help the person or household find safe alternative housing immediately, rather than entering shelter or experiencing unsheltered homelessness. It is intended to ensure that the homelessness experience is as brief as possible, to prevent unsheltered homelessness, and to avert stays in shelter. Diversion is not necessarily but can be combined with financial assistance, Diversion programs seek to keep people in their homes or to help them get into housing quickly by providing one time assistance that addresses an immediate barrier to housing. Diversion assistance is often administered through a Centralized Diversion Fund (CDF). CDF funds can be used for any one-time intervention that is directly related to a stable housing outcome, including first/last month rent and deposit, utility assistance, transportation assistance, and hotel/motel vouchers to those with no significant barriers to permanent housing. Funds can also be used to pay for transportation to another location if stable housing at the destination location can be verified. Data from Spokane's Centralized Diversion Fund show an average cost of $1,800 per intervention for the period from November 1, 2021 to September 30, 2022. Additionally, 87% of those who accessed the CDF were still housed six months after receiving assistance. According to statistics taken from the Department of Commerce Golden Report, this number is far lower than the average cost for either rapid re -housing or transitional shelter intervention, which were an average of $8,144 and $17,500 per person in 2021 respectively.' Diversion is a cost-effective and efficient way to help beneficiaries get into or to stay stably housed and should be a part of any prevention strategy moving forward. The Centralized Diversion Fund program has consistently not been able to meet the need for assistance due to high demand and lack of sufficient funding. Rental assistance programs for individuals or families arc another critical tool for preventing homelessness. These time limited programs can help households w ither financial storms that would otherwise result in the loss of housing and potentially result in an eviction, which makes obtaining housing in the futurc even more difficult. Rental assistance programs arc generally more resource intensive than diversion, but Tess costly than emergency housing. Rental assistance programs funded by local, state and federal dollars have spent tcns of millions of dollars in Spokane county to prevent evictions. Despite the size of this investment, rental assistance programs have not been sufficient to address thc need for these resources, I iving many Spokane Valley households that would otherwise be eligible, without this option. According to a survey conducted by The Zone in Spokane that has received over 1,100 responses,117% of respondents owe back rcnt, 75% say they are struggling to pay rcnt now or in thc n -or futurc, and 56% have alr Ay received eviction notices.' $ The ZoNE (thezonespokane.org) 9 State Strategic Plan, Annual Report and Audits (wa.gov) 4e The ZoNE (thezonespokane.org). 6 Spokane Valley Homeless Action Plan (SVHAP) Connect to Employment Support to Increased Incomes Employment support can be another important way to help people avoid homelessness. Employment support could include assistance with becoming job -ready and finding employment. This would include job training/readiness programs, and funds available to help pay for job -related costs such as needed clothing, tools, or training. Support for individuals who want to increase their income would also fall under this category. There are many residents who work full-time, but still struggle to pay the costs of rising rents and other basic needs. Assisting the Asset -Limited, Income -Constrained, Employed, or "A.L.I.C.E" households to up -skill and find better paying employment can both serve to reduce the potential for future homelessness, while also helping to address the shortage of employees in better paying sectors. Increase incomes would help to meet rising rental costs, and ideally would increase rates of home ownership. While some agencies such as Habitat for Humanity do offer paths to home ownership, the current median home price of $422,250 in 2022 means that only 7% of wage earners in the Spokane area are able to afford purchasing a home at this median price." For some, increasing income is related to education and job training opportunities. Programs such as Foundational Community Supports (FCS) and the Basic Food and Employment Training (BFET) specialize in job training and placement for individuals with a variety of barriers, from lack of job experience, to living with disabilities. Agencies such as WorkSource Spokane, Spokane Workforce Council, Next Generation Zone, Career Path Services, and the Employment Security Department (ESD) can help those with jobs to up -skill and seek better -paid employment opportunities. The lack of needed labor force in our current job market has created conditions for those interested in apprenticeships or paid training opportunities to learn new skills and get hired by firms eager to bring on additional staff. For example, manufacturing companies like Wagstaff, Hydrafab, and Mercer Mass Timber will train from within or provide a pathway to apprenticeships to help employees develop needed skills. The City's Economic Development Department is actively working to recruit employers and match them to employees who fit the needed skill sets. Attracting quality employers and jobs to the City will mean more opportunities for residents that allow them to afford rent, and ideally home ownership in our community. Employment options that provide a living wage are critical to reversing the trend of households being priced out of the market, which is directly related to increasing homelessness across our region. For other individuals who are homeless or on the verge of homelessness, increasing income means applying for benefits such as Social Security Insurance/Social Security Disability Insurance or Veterans' benefits. Connecting eligible individuals to the SSI/SSDI Outreach, Access, and Recovery (SOAR) program or Ware Law Offices for assistance applying for and appealing rejections for Social Security benefits is one avenue to help connect some people to additional income. Recruiting SOAR or legal assistance providers to set up shop in the Valley would help make the services more accessible for those in this community rather than requiring them to go to downtown Spokane to receive assistance, which can present a 11 Statistics provided by Tom Hormel, Washington Association of Realtors. 7 Spokane Valley Homeless Action Plan (SVHAP) significant barrier to some of those who are eligible for benefits. Referring Veterans to Goodwill's Supportive Services for Veterans Families (SSVF) program is important to ensure that any veterans we may work with are able to access full benefits they may be entitled to, including housing assistance. In any case, having staff dedicated to making these connections with clients, and referrals to the appropriate services is critical. Develop Senior & Assisted Living Housing (Including Permanent Supportive Housing) Many of the unhoused individuals the City encounters who are living with disabilities, may bo unable to work due to age or other conditions, or may have significant developmental or psycho -social impairments that make finding and retaining a traditional apartment unlikely. During the 2022 Point In Time count, 31% of all adult respondents self -identified as living with a serious mental illness, as compared to 4% of Spokane County residents estimated to be living with a serious mental illness in 2020.12 These individuals are statistically overrepresented in the unhoused population and are often more vulnerable and at risk for negative outcomes. Getting these people into housing that can meet their needs is critical for long-term stability. Dedicated senior housing is needed to meet the needs of Spokane Valley's growing senior population. Demographically, the Valley's senior population is growing as is the need for affordable and safe options that meet the unique challenges faced by seniors. Assisted living facilities that provide services on -site are critical to help seniors age in place and avoid the need for more intensive and costly housing solutions, and to prevent them from becoming homeless. Assisted living options for those under age 65 who live with mental or physical impairments are also needed. Currently, there are very few options for those who need these types of services. Requirements for providers of assisted living facilities can be complicated and require a specific set of skills and know- how that make it challenging for new providers to come online. Incentivizing exiting providers of assisted living facilities to expand and take more Medicaid -eligible clients may be a faster and more efficient way of bringing additional needed beds online. Permanent supportive housing (PSH) is one option that aims to provide more intensive services in housing. PSH is subsidized, leased housing with no limit on length of stay that prioritizes people who need comprehensive support services to retain tenancy, and utilizes admissions practices designed to use lower barriers to entry than would be typical for other subsidized or unsubsidized rental housing, especially related to rental history, criminal history, and personal behaviors. Permanent supportive housing is paired with on -site or off -site voluntary services designed to support a person living with a complex and disabling behavioral health or physical health condition who was experiencing homelessness or was at imminent risk of homelessness prior to moving into housing to retain their housing, and be a successful tenant in a housing arrangement, improve the resident's health status, and connect the resident of the housing with community -based health care, treatment, or employment services. PSH is one important option that can help provide stability in housing for many of the people in our homeless response system. However, it is not designed to provide many of the more technical or clinical 12 Point in Time 2022 - Draft (arcgis.com) 8 Spokane Valley Homeless Action Plan (SVHAP) services needed by those who live with significant disabilities, including possible mental health disorders. To serve this population, more intensive assisted living options are needed. Create/Support a Housing Crisis Hotline While the state-wide 211 resource line can direct residents to local resources, it is not a Diversion service and is not equipped to help tenants at risk of homelessness navigate the often -complicated landlord - tenant legal environment. Creating a housing crisis -specific hotline or bolstering the current 211 program with diversion -related resources and expertise could be a relatively cost-effective way of supporting those at risk of homelessness. The Tenants' Union, Northwest Justice project, Northwest Fair Housing Alliance, or one of the dispute resolution centers in Spokane that assists with eviction mediation could be potential partners to assist with this type of hotline. B. Reduce Homelessness: The second objective of this plan is to reduce current levels of homelessness. Because each individual and family experiencing homelessness is impacted by their own unique set of needs and challenges, multiple strategies must be employed simultaneously to achieve this objective. It is important to acknowledge that there are significant differences in how certain populations are represented among those experiencing homelessness, as well as differences among those that are willing or able to take advantage of existing interventions. For example, while those identifying as American Indian, Alaska Native, or Indigenous make up approximately 1% of the County's population13, they represented 7.8% of all those counted during the 2023 Point In Time (PIT) count. Those identifying as Black or African American comprise 1.75% of the County's population, but 6.9% of those counted during the 2023 PIT. Further, of all races/ethnicities identified, those identifying as American Indian, Alaska Native, or Indigenous were the only group with more unsheltered homeless than sheltered homeless. With this knowledge in mind, it is critical that we look at any possible interventions through a lens of matching resources to the unique needs and experiences of those we are working with. For example, if we know that more Native Americans sleep outside than in a shelter in the dead of winter, it should inform our approach for creating shelter spaces that are welcoming and approachable for all populations. The transition from homelessness to being stably housed can be seen as a continuum, with certain interventions and resources needed in the initial stages of the process, while different resources and interventions needed at later stages. The following strategies outline interventions and resources that cover the length of the continuum, from initial engagement of unhoused individuals to stable long-term housing. 13 Spokane County, WA I Data USA 9 Spokane Valley Homeless Action Plan (SVHAP) Short -Term Interventions The first need in the continuum of homeless to stably housed is to make contact and connect with those experiencing homelessness. This is not a one-time event, rather it takes time to build trust and work through initial barriers or resistance before progress can be made. Below are several critical components needed for successful initial and follow-up contacts. Outreach and Case Management A unified street outreach approach is critical to ensure that those who are unsheltered are identified, directed to emergency shelter or other services, and receive ongoing engagement and case management. Outreach teams can be comprised of homeless service providers, law enforcement, staff from mental health andfacilities, substance use disorder professionals treatment facilities., and code enforcement. Pairing mental health professionals experienced in crisis management with law enforcement is an emerging best practice that can help triage the crisis and deescalate potential conflicts. This unificd cffort creates a A multi -disciplinary approach to assist individuals to move from the streets and into emergency shelter, directly into transitional housing, or permanent housing as dctcrmincd appropriate can better respond to the complicated and layered challenges faced by many people who experience homelessness. Homeless outreach has two significant components. The first component is maintaining strong communication among service provider partners. To support this communication, the City leads a monthly networking meeting called the "Valley Huddle." Outreach teams, service providers, and other relevant stakeholders actively participate and share information on specific issues, interventions, and clients in the Huddle. The second major component of homeless outreach is to ensure that providers holding contracts with the City are meeting the goal to assist the City in reducing homelessness. This means that the homeless outreach teams must be working to: 1. Move individuals into shelter; 2. Gather required documentation such as photo ID and Social Security card that are necessary for permanent housing, whether through rapid rehousing, permanent supportive housing, or other types of housing; and 3. Identify mental health and/or substance treatment needs and assist the individual in accessing these resources. The current 211 system or a future Housing Crisis Hotline could be another option for a first outreach contact with those experiencing homelessness. Through a hotline, callers can get direct information and referrals to needed services like emergency shelter or treatment options. Better advertising the current 211 resource and making sure it is widely available would be a relatively simple way to help direct some people to first -step resources that are currently available. Emergency Shelters and Hoteling 10 Spokane Valley Homeless Action Plan (SVHAP) While outreach teams are critical for finding people experiencing homelessness throughout the community, there needs to be a place for the people to go for them to move along the continuum from homeless to stably housed. While Spokane County does offer a variety of shelter options, none are in Spokane Valley. Since data collection for the City began in May of 2022, we have learned that 50.6% of the homeless individuals contacted by our outreach team were last housed in this community, which is why they prefer to stay in the City. For these individuals, the distance to resources and separation from their community is a major deterrent to using existing shelter options that are located outside of the City. There are others who actively avoid the City of Spokane downtown core where most shelter and other resources are located due to concerns for safety and drug use/availability.14 Furthermore, as evidenced by the 2022 and 2023 Point In Time (PIT) counts, the number of unhoused in the Spokane region exceeds the number of available beds and so there are often challenges finding available bed space.' The City has adopted regulations governing placement and operation of emergency shelters in chapter 19.45 of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code. Emergency shelters are allowed in the Commercial M;= -xi U 7..., Mixed Use, Regional Commercial, Industrial Mixed Use, and I zones, and cannot serve more than 20 individuals at any given time. These services must also be at least one mile apart from any other emergency shelter or emergency housing, or Transitional Parking service. Chapter 19.45 SVMC was designed to mitigate many of the negative externalities that stem from the overcrowded low -barrier shelters. The aim is to create smaller, more manageable, and less chaotic shelters that also have less of an impact on the communities where the shelters are located. An intermediary step to year-round emergency shelter would be a temporary version set up in response to an emergent and time -limited threat to public safety. Typical scenarios for this temporary emergency shelter would include excessive heat or smoke in summer months, and cold temperatures in winter months. Setting up a temporary shelter for winter months, or extended summer heat/smoke would be less expensive than a year-round shelter option and could be a good starting point for the City's shelter system. Such a temporary shelter could also be employed for other less common reasons, such as sheltering residents after a fire or other natural disaster. Chapter 19.45 SVMC also allows the City Manager to authorize the operation of a temporary emergency shelter for up to 30 days in situations where an immediate life, health, or safety concern exists due to unanticipated or severe environmental conditions. The city manager may authorize an extension to the 30 days for a specified period of time, if the city council has adopted a resolution pursuant to Chapter 38.52 RCW declaring that the conditions which gave rise to the operation of the temporary emergency shelter continue in effect, and constitute a threat to the life, health, and safety of the residents of the City. Temporary emergency shelters authorized by SVMC 19.45.050 are not subject to the requirements of Chapter 19.45 SVMC. Emergency hoteling is an option to provide vulnerable individuals with immediate shelter when health and safety are at risk. This option is particularly important during winter months when cold temperatures create deadly conditions for those who are unhoused. A hotel can also be a critical tool to get someone 14 During the 2022 PIT count, 44% of unsheltered respondents indicated that "safety/fear of violence" was a primary reason for not accessing the regional shelter system. 15 Point in Time 2022 - Draft (arcgis.com) 11 Spokane Valley Homeless Action Plan (SVHAP) into a safe space immediately while providing time for follow-up case management to occur. It is one necessary option to include in a comprehensive response to homelessness, albeit an option that cannot be used in all situations, or for extended periods of time. uDay Drop -In Center Emergency h tcling is an ti n t r vi c vulncra lc in ivi uals with immc i to shelter whcn health create ca ly c n iti ns f r th sc wh arc unh usc . A h tcl can als c a critical t I t get s me nc int a safc s acc immc iatcly while r vi ing timc f r f II w u case management t ccur. It is no necessary ti n t inclu c in a c m rchcnsivc rcs nsc t h mcicssncss, al cit an ti n that cann t c usc in all situati ns, r f r cxtcn c cri s f timc. Day drop in shelters centers are the final component of a responsive and comprehensive shelter system providing a space for unhoused individuals to find rest, resources, and services in one location, while at thc same time helping to reduce thc impact they might otherwise have on ar -a businesses or facilities. In all these cases i t is key to recognize that a shelter, whether overnight, temporary, or day drop -in, is a place where outreach workers and case managers can connect with those in need of services and make progress towards housing goals. Day drop -in centers can also provide critical services such as showers, laundry services and gear storage. According to data collected by the City's outreach team, approximately 10% of those experiencing homelessness in Spokane Valley are employed. For this group, those looking for employment, applying for housing, or even just seeking to attend appointments, the ability to be clean and wear clean clothes is critical. Further, getting to a job or an appointment while carrying all one's belongings can be a serious challenge, especially if using public transportation. A day drop -in center can help to address this critical gap in services, while at the same time providing a needed emergency heating or cooling location during inclement weather. Providing a space where those experiencing can be during the day to utilize services and connect with case management is not only important for helping to transition people out of homelessness, but it is also a benefit to area retail locations, neighbors, and public facilities. A day drop -in center can help mitigate the impacts of loitering, or the use of public facilities like a library as a refuge when no other options exist. Transitional Parking/Camping The purpose of transitional parking or camping sites is to concentrate both the needs and services into fewer locations to make meeting the outreach goals of contact and follow-up more possible. Currently individuals who live in vehicles are continually on the move to avoid issues; or if they do not move regularly, they can become a nuisance causing safety and health concerns for nearby neighbors or businesses. Illegal encampments present similar issues where individuals find out -of -the way locations in areas like the Dishman Hills or on Department of Natural Resources (DNR) property near Mirabeau Meadows to set up camp. The accumulated trash and hazardous waste are a serious health and safety concern, and creates 12 Spokane Valley Homeless Action Plan (SVHAP) an environment where nearby residents feel unsafe. In other cases, a person may choose to stay on the move, sleeping in doorways or other protected locations for one night at a time, leaving in the morning when the business opens, for example. In these cases, locating the individual to offer and follow up with services is challenging. The creation of transitional parking and allowable camping sites serves to accomplish several goals. Camping sites would be an immediate solution when there is no shelter space available. Transitional parking is beneficial as it allows for a temporary place for individuals living in vehicles to safely park until housing can be secured. There are significant benefits in terms of mitigation when multiple individuals are staying in a single area rather than multiple areas throughout the City. Toilets and trash collection are the two most obvious benefits of having a single location where homeless individuals are allowed to stay. The other important goal of this approach is to keep unhoused individuals in one place so that outreach, case workers, and medical teams can locate and engage, and begin building relationships necessary to make progress towards stable housing. When unhoused individuals are constantly on the move from one location to another, it is nearly impossible for service providers to locate and build a relationship with them, or to make progress towards housing goals. There are a number of steps that can be taken to mitigate for potential problems related to transitional parking or camping sites. First, City code limits the total number of people who could use such a site to 20, as well as dictating where and under what conditions such a program could operate. Trash collection and restroom access are requirements, along with an operations plan that includes outreach to surrounding property owners, provision of human and social services, a security plan, and a code of conduct that addresses threatening or unsafe behavior, substance use, safety, and cleanliness. Additional precautions for transitional parking and camping programs could include background checks for participants to ensure the safety of all clients and staff, and a registration system so that only those approved to participate in the program are allowed on -site. Such programs bring challenges and need to have effective management to ensure that they do not become safety and health concerns both for those receiving services and for the rest of the community. The choice is between completely unregulated camping and parking throughout the community as it exists now, and a regulated program with sanitation, security, and services provided on -site. Given these options, it is a better use of limited resources and a more effective strategy to provide a location where the impacts of parking and camping can be mitigated, and service providers are able to build relationships and help move people out of homelessness. Mental Health and Addiction Crisis Interventions The County's Crisis Stabilization and Withdrawal Management Center, located at 1302 W Gardener Avenue in the City of Spokane, is available for law enforcement or medical facilities to make direct referrals of individuals who may be in crisis and/or in need of withdrawal management. This voluntary option has been a critical resource when the City's outreach team encounters someone who needs assistance with mental health and/or substance use disorders. Having an on -demand facility that can be accessed at any time has proven to be critical in responding to needs at the time they are presented, rather than making a referral for services at some point in the future where there's no certainty of follow- 13 Spokane Valley Homeless Action Plan (SVHAP) through. At the Stabilization center, individuals are immediately connected with housing specialists and other case management assistance. Because this option is located n ar downtown Spokane, some Spokane Valley residents who could benefit from these services are reluctant to leave their community to access it. Additionally, because this service does not allow animals, some clients are reluctant to enter a program that would require them to give up their pet. Creating a partnership with a local animal shelter to temporarily house animals for those seeking tr atmcnt or transitional housing would remove this barrier allowing more individuals to take advantage of this option. While this has been an important resource for the City's homeless response, it is not always available because the beds are often full based on the growing need for these interventions. In general, there is a lack of needed in -patient withdrawal management, addiction recovery and mental health resources for those experiencing homelessness in Spokane Valley who need immediate and intensive interventions. This problem was made worse when one of the County's few withdrawal management providers, American Behavioral Health Systems, lost its certification to operate in 2022. Other providers, like Sequoia Detox Centers, only accept private insurance or out-of-pocket payments, making it unaffordable for people experiencing homelessness. Additionally, because this option is located near downtown Spokane, some Spokane Valley residents who could benefit from these services are reluctant to leave their community to access it, so a similar service located in Spokane Valley would help reduce barriers for some who might be willing to access services. Pet Boarding and Vehicle Storage When someone is ready and willing to enter stabilization, shelter, or housing, there can be several obstacles that keep them from accessing services. As discussed in previous sections, the location of services is critical, as many of the people we encounter are from this community and want to stay here, or are actively attempting to avoid downtown Spokane where most resources are currently concentrated. From our experience issues related to pets and vehicles can also present barriers to those willing to access services or housing interventions. For many people experiencing homelessness who have pets, giving them up to seek services lust isn't an option. While some shelters do allow pets, others do not. Stabilization/treatment programs do not allow pets, and many housing options will only allow pets if they are documented service or emotional support animals, and have all the required shots and licenses. Providing options for pet "foster care" that can look after someone's pet while they go into treatment or stay in a shelter can reduce a barrier that might otherwise keep a person from accessing needed care. Likewise, assistance with obtaining necessary certifications and paperwork, or providing needed medical treatment and vaccinations are also important for removing barriers for people seeking housing with their pet. SpokAnimal's Guardian Angel program can provide these types of needed services, but capacity is often a limiting factor. Entering into an agreement with a provider to offer these services to individuals experiencing homelessness in Spokane Valley as needed would help address this barrier. What to do with vehicles for those entering stabilization or treatment is also a challenge that can present a barrier to those interested in accessing services. Often a vehicle is the last asset of someone experiencing 14 Spokane Valley Homeless Action Plan (SVHAP) homelessness, and can be critical for attending appointments, job search, and employment. Additionally, a vehicle may be temporarily serving as someone's home, which makes giving it up to seek needed services an even bigger barrier. Storing vehicles for people in treatment can present challenges related to security, access, and liability. But addressing this barrier can be critical for someone who is unwilling to give up a vehicle in exchange for seeking services. Youth/Family Services Community stakeholders have expressed a need for a location to serve area youth, specifically older youth. The Central Valley School District (CVSD) operates a Student and Family Engagement Center (SFEC) that provides a wide variety of services and resources to children and their families. This program is intended for families from the CVSD and operates on limited hours during summer break. A dedicated site that provides a safe and healthy environment for older youth is needed in support of prevention efforts, which are the primary focus of the SVHAP. In addition to providing healthy activities, such a center could also provide internet access, homework assistance, and case management to assist with housing, food/clothing, transportation, and legal needs. "In -reach" workers work inside schools to identify and support youth facing homelessness. Volunteers of America (VOA) is the current provider of in -reach services in Spokane County. While this work does include Spokane Valley, increased staffing is needed to meet the demand and need in our City's schools for these services. In 2022 there were 780 homeless students in Spokane Valley, of which 168 were unaccompanied by any family or guardian. A dedicated in -reach position for Spokane Valley youth is needed to best serve these children and their families. Family Promise of Spokane began a contract in 2023 to pilot "in -reach" school - based case management positions at University High and East Valley High to work with students and their families experiencing homelessness or housing instability. This is a positive step for serving Spokane Valley children and their families. -Dedicating space and resources (including "in -reach" positions) are critical as part of up -stream interventions that will benefit Spokane Valley youth, as well as have a positive impact on long-term trends related to homelessness in our community. CVSD's SFEC is a valuable program for families experiencing homelessness and housing instability. The SFEC provides a technology center, clothing and food bank, community room for recreation and community gatherings, laundry services, and parenting classes. A similar site that serves families outside of the CVSD, or additional funding to the SFEC that would allow it to serve families throughout Spokane Valley, would aid hundreds of families that are on the margins. Services that are focused on stabilizing families with children and homeless youth are critical for an up- stream approach that seeks to reduce future homelessness by providing needed interventions early in a child's life. Children who live through homelessness are at much greater risk of having traumatic experiences that are associated with a variety of negative outcomes, including future homelessness as an adult. Not only is it far better for the health and wellbeing of children to address housing instability early on, but it is also better for the community that must deal with the long-term implications. Medium -Term Interventions 15 Spokane Valley Homeless Action Plan (SVHAP) Initial engagement and relationship building are the first pieces of the continuum from unhoused to stable housing. Stabilization and transitional housing are the next pieces. Once contact has been made, shelter has been provided, and a connection to relevant service providers has been made, the next goal is to transition the individual to medium -term housing solutions where they can stabilize and turn their attention to next steps that are needed to achieve long-term housing stability. Transitional Providers Transitional Housing (TH) is defined as a project that provides housing and supportive services to homeless persons or families, or other displaced individuals or families in need of protective shelter, for up to two years with the purpose of facilitating homeless or otherwise displaced persons and families into independent living. Detention and post -detention facilities, hospitals, psychiatric and/or substance abuse and secure community transition facilities are not transitional housing. TH can take different forms and target different populations. For example, some TH providers serve families and others may target men with a history of incarceration or substance use disorders. TH is not emergency shelter but is also not a long-term housing solution. TH provides people with an opportunity to make progress towards goals related to long-term housing stability such as building a positive rental history, securing needed documentation, obtaining employment, accessing treatment interventions, and practicing living in a space close to other tenants. Many TH services require tenants to pay rent, but generally at costs below average market rates. While tenants are required to sign a rental agreement, these agreements are not a traditional lease and do not confer the same protections. For example, most THs are "clean and sober" locations so a tenant can be forced to leave for using alcohol, something that would not be possible with a traditional lease. TH generally includes access to additional supportive services to assist tenants in making progress towards long-term housing goals. Some innovative models pair housing with programming, job training, and supportive services. One local provider manages a non-profit network of clean/sober houses that includes health and wellness programming, alongside a for -profit contracting business. This model serves hard -to - house program participants by combining an accessible and healthy living option with job training and income. The need for this type of programming is evidenced by the rapid growth of the program, and extremely low vacancy rates for their housing. Bridge Housing The Salvation Army's Way -Out Bridge Housing Program (TWO) provides shelter and services to individuals who are stable and ready to move forward with housing and other long-term goals. Sobriety and self -care requirements make this a high -barrier option that is not available for those who may be struggling with substance use disorders or who are living with significant disabilities. This option provides a relatively calm and orderly environment for those who are ready to find employment or applying for housing. This service is not a good fit for many of the unsheltered homeless individuals living in the City, but it has proven to be useful and effective for those who are able and willing to comply with the program's requirements. 16 Spokane Valley Homeless Action Plan (SVHAP) Like the Stabilization center, TWO provides housing navigation and other case management to help clients successfully plan for next steps. Because TWO is located near downtown Spokane, some Spokane Valley residents who could benefit from this service are reluctant to leave their community to access it. Additionally, because this service does not allow animals, some clients are reluctant to enter a program that would require them to give up their pet. Creating a partnership with a local animal shelter to temporarily house animals for those seeking treatment or transitional housing would help increase the number of individuals who could take advantage of this option. Homeless System Housing Referrals Other medium -term options are accessed through the community -wide Coordinated Entry (CE) system. Housing and homeless programs that receive federal, state, county, or municipal funding from the City of Spokane, whether directly or as a pass -through, are required to participate in the regional Coordinated Entry system and submit/accept referrals through the Community Management Information System (CMIS). This includes the Salvation Army's Way -Out Bridge Housing program, rapid re -housing programs that provide move -in and rental assistance, transitional housing, and permanent supportive housing programs that help house individuals with disabilities and a history of chronic homelessness, in order to reside in units supported by on -site case management and other services. Ensuring that access to the CE system is available, and that Spokane Valley residents who need it are receiving referrals for appropriate housing interventions is critical to help unhoused individuals make progress on the continuum from homeless to stably housed. Housing referrals through CE can be placed by outreach teams, shelter providers, case managers for transitional parking/camping sites, at a day drop - in center, or by youth/family service providers. These housing referrals are one important tool for helping those who are unhoused to access stable housing and begin making progress on other stability -related goals. Most housing options accessed through CE (apart from permanent supportive housing) provide medium -term assistance. After a period of time, the tenant is expected to take over responsibility for the rent payment, or transition to other long-term housing. These interventions are designed to help provide an intermediary step towards long- term housing stability. The Coordinated Entry System Map: 17 Spokane Valley Homeless Action Plan (SVHAP) ingles, Families, eterans and Youth enter the system ire Coordinated Assessment Delivers more complete client information to an inclusive group of stakeholder to drive personalized programs T Outreach and Engagement Targets high utilizers of system resources There isa need to create a housing system for youth and young adults which includes a coordinated entry, resource centers, age appropriate housing options, and a focus on prevention for those exiting instiludons Coesnot reed svelter tonight Needs shelter tonight Assessment of needs Needs shelter tonight Long -Term Interventions Targeted Prevention and Diversion Preserves current housing situations or make immediate alternative arrangements Temporary Shelter A coordinated 24/7 shelter system for families and individuals {men, women and youth) Able to retain housing or gain new housing bypassing shelter ► Unable to find housing on own within short period leg_ 7-10 days) Targeted to specific population Highest needs, unable to maintain hie using with a ut ongoing services, subsidy Able to emitshelter on own Rapid Re -Housing Assists moving into housing within 20 days of being referred and provides a safety net to promote long-term housing stability Transitional Housing Supportive services allow for development of skills that will be needed once permanently housed Stable Independent/ Voucher Housing Meets specific and changing client needs Moves Perman: from ongoing use o nt Supportive Housing crisis response system to independent living Long-term solutions to reducing existing homelessness are essentially the same as the strategies needed to prevent homelessness from occurring in the first place as outlined in section A of this plan. Below are several additional strategies that are often used specifically, although not exclusively, to assist those coming out of homelessness. Foundational Community Supports Foundational Community Supports (FCS) is a program offering benefits for supportive housing and supported employment for Apple Health -eligible beneficiaries with complex needs. Amerigroup Washington, Inc. works with housing and employment providers to help clients find and maintain jobs; acquire stable, independent housing; and gain the necessary skills to be successful. Most of the houseless individuals encountered by the City's Outreach team are eligible for this program, although there is a process for requesting and receiving approval that can take up to several weeks before assistance can begin. Once approved for services, FCS Housing Specialists can work directly with clients to make progress on any needed goal related to long-term housing stability, including housing assessments, identifying housing resources, support obtaining a lease, independent living skills development, landlord relations, and crisis management. FCS Employment Specialists can assist eligible clients by providing vocational/job-related 18 Spokane Valley Homeless Action Plan (SVHAP) discovery or assessment, planning for employment, job placement, development and coaching, and building skills for negotiating with prospective employers. Supportive housing and supported employment services under FCS are managed by a single statewide third -party administrator (TPA) contracted by the Healthcare Authority — Amerigroup Washington, Inc. Providers of FCS services contract with the TPA and are reimbursed on a fee -for -service basis. This means that FCS services could be added as an additional resource to programs operating in the City, or as a stand- alone service. In either case, working to make sure this resource is available for Spokane Valley residents will provide an additional support for those seeking housing and employment assistance. Housing Vouchers Housing vouchers, currently provided through the Spokane Housing Authority, are another tool that can help promote housing stability. These vouchers provide ongoing rental assistance for qualifying individuals. Some of these vouchers come in the form of units that are set aside for this specific use (Project Based Vouchers), while others provide rental assistance to tenants who can find their own unit within the market -rate rental environment (Section 8 vouchers). The primary constraints for use of these vouchers are two -fold. First, there is a long waiting list for those who are eligible to receive a voucher. And second, just because someone has received a voucher does not mean they can necessarily find a unit that will accept the voucher. With increasing rental rates region -wide, vouchers often are not able to cover the cost of rent. Additionally, some landlords are unwilling to rent units to those who hold a voucher. It is illegal to discriminate in housing against those who use a housing voucher, but it does still occur. These constraints aside, housing vouchers can be one important tool in helping eligible households find housing stability. Making sure that these programs have a footprint in Spokane Valley to help connect our residents with this resource is critical. Additionally, encouraging housing developments to set aside a given number of units for voucher holders is also critical to ensure there are available units to participate in the program. Hotel/Motel Conversion One strategy to create additional affordable units for those transitioning out of homelessness and/or in permanent supportive housing is to purchase and convert existing hotels/motels into units suitable for long-term tenancy. The Department of Commerce has made funding available for this specific purpose through a rapid capital housing acquisition program. The benefit of converting existing hotels/motels into permanent housing is that it takes far less time than constructing a new structure, and rehabilitation of an existing property is also generally much less expensive than new construction. Additionally, hotels/motels are generally already located close to public transportation and other services. Converting hotels/motels can be doubly beneficial as it provides needed units for those transitioning out of homelessness while also improving blighted or nuisance properties. The challenge of hotel/motel conversion comes from the ongoing operations and maintenance costs associated with this type of housing. This type of transitional housing needs to be paired with robust services to ensure those transitioning out of homelessness have the support they need 19 Spokane Valley Homeless Action Plan (SVHAP) to be successful, and to help hold people accountable. The ongoing costs of service provision and maintenance would need to be factored into any plan for hotel/motel conversion. C. Improve Quality of Life: Improving quality of life for both housed and unhoused Spokane Valley residents is the third objective in this plan. Homelessness creates significant negative impacts for both those who are unhoused as well as the surrounding community where they may be located. Substance abuse, mental and physical health issues, and personal safety are critical issues facing those who are unhoused, while the surrounding community may see increased garbage and litter from encampments, increased crime, and loss of use of community facilities that are being used for encampments. The third objective focuses on improving the quality of life and reducing the negative impacts for those experiencing homelessness as well as the surrounding community. Day Drop -In Center Currently, the City does not have day -time shelter space located within the City or that is specifically dedicated for use by homeless within Spokane Valley. As a result, the City's homeless population generally congregates along business corridors, parks, riverbanks, and other areas of both public and private open space. Further, given recent legal developments, the lack of available dedicated space can present difficulties for enforcement of the City's regulations governing use of public spaces. Providing a safe space for individuals experiencing homelessness to go during the day will benefit both the larger community and businesses as loitering and other related issues such as littering, crime, and used drug paraphernalia will be reduced to fewer locations. Those accessing the drop -in center can more easily be connected with services and case management needed to move them towards housing. Day drop -in centers provide the needed support that people experiencing homelessness require to access a variety of resources including: 1. Health care coverage, food assistance, etc.; 2. Permanent housing referrals; 3. Emergency shelter referrals; 4. General case management services; 5. Employment services; and 6. Disability assistance In addition to connecting individuals to resources critical for exiting homelessness, day drop -in centers also provide a critical space for those who are unsheltered during hours when many overnight shelters require patrons to remain off -site. Most overnight shelters require patrons to leave during daytime hours and check in each evening to secure a bed for the night. Some shelters even require that patrons leave the immediate surrounding area during daytime hours. This presents a serious problem for shelter patrons who have nowhere they can go during the day, especially for those with health and mobility issues and during winter months or inclement weather events. Day drop -in centers are also a benefit for 20 Spokane Valley Homeless Action Plan (SVHAP) communities near shelter locations, which often struggle with the daily influx on sidewalks, parking lots, and parks, of shelter patrons who are required to vacate their primary residence each day. The City has adopted regulations governing placement and operation of day drop -in centers and similar emergency shelters in chapter 19.45 of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code. Generally, such uses are allowed in the FMR, CMU, MU, RC, IMU, and I zones, and cannot serve more than 20 individuals at any given time. These services must also be at least one mile apart from any other emergency shelter or emergency housing service. Encampment and Trash Clean -Up The City is committed to cleaning up homeless encampments and trash on City -owned properties. Additionally, the City is active in various clean-up efforts within the City on both public and private property. The City actively works with the Department of Transportation, Department of Natural Resources, local water districts, Spokane County Parks, and Union Pacific/BNSF Railroads to enforce clean- up of camps and trash on their properties in and around the City. However, when cooperation is not effective, code enforcement has played an important role in compelling partnering agencies and private landowners to address trash and camping on their properties. City staff have regularly assisted in these clean-up efforts to support our partners as they struggle to address encampments and trash in these areas. The City provides several avenues for residents to contact City staff regarding encampments and trash. The City's provides a web portal to allow citizens to report homeless or trash issues to the City. The complaint form is currently located at https://www.spokanevallev.org/311 . The City provides contact information through the resource guide distributed to partners and residents, as well as through City and partner websites and through walk-in inquiries. City staff regularly fields calls and website submissions from concerned residents related to encampments and trash, and will continue to provide timely and effective responses to community concerns related to this issue. The City has also created a phone app used by the City housing and homeless team, code enforcement and law enforcement to document encampments and trash. This tool allows users to log a location and status of a specific site, such as an occupied camp, abandoned camp, or trash. The app tracks which camps have received 48-hours notice to vacate, which sites are ready for cleanup, and which sites have been cleaned up. This is a valuable tool for documenting issues that need to be addressed, and also improving our understanding of where common encampment 'hot spots' are within the City. Business Community Outreach and Information In response to conversations with local businesses and the Valley Chamber, the City is working with law enforcement to develop a guide for businesses of best practices and tools to address the impacts of homelessness on their business. This resource includes two areas of focus. The first is information about preventative measures a business can take to mitigate potential impacts. The second has to do with tools that business owners can use when they encounter problems on their property related to homelessness, such as using the City's reporting tools to get follow-up from the homeless outreach team when needed. 21 Spokane Valley Homeless Action Plan (SVHAP) This guide will be distributed to all businesses working with the Valley Chamber, helping to expand the reach of the City's outreach efforts with local businesses to address the concerns they face related to homelessness. In partnership with the Valley Chamber, the City will continue to organize informational events with community stakeholders to express concerns, receive information, and build alliances. An intentional and ongoing effort to engage stakeholders throughout the community, including businesses, is a critical piece of the effort to mitigate quality of life concerns related to homelessness. D. Government and Legislative Advocacy: One final objective of this plan is to advocate for robust and ongoing legislative advocacy at local, state, and federal levels. Many times actions taken at the Federal or State level, whether legislative or in the courts, have a significant impact on how local governments can plan and implement important actions. In 2018, a federal court ruling, Martin v. City of Boise16, set significant restrictions on enforcement of public loitering and camping laws, generally identifying consideration of shelter availability when enforcing certain criminal provisions related to homelessness. At the State level, homelessness prevention and reduction has increased in importance, and more programs have been created and funding made available. However, in many cases the resources and funding come with requirements that not all agencies will want to agree to, such as weakening zoning laws and mandating certain types of housing. The City should consider advocating where appropriate changes in state and federal law and for funding programs where such changes or funding support elements of this plan. The City should also consider regional cooperation and collaborative efforts to address homelessness as they may fit within the elements of this plan. Conclusion As stated in the introduction to this plan, the City's top priority is preventing homelessness from occurring in the first place. It is the City's position that preventing homelessness is the most effective way to address this growing challenge. Focusing up -stream to address some of the root causes will help stem the inflow of those experiencing homelessness. Further, we believe that preventing homelessness from occurring in the first place reduces the amount of human suffering, trauma, and negative outcomes often experienced by those who live through homelessness. However, we understand that homelessness does exist today, and that it results in significant personal and community costs for all those affected. Therefore, we must also work to reduce existing rates of homelessness. To do this, the City needs to ensure sufficient access to short, medium, and long-term interventions that can help move people through the continuum of unhoused to stably housed. Bolstering available resources in any one of these areas would be a success, but without sufficient supports and 16 920 F.3d 584 (9th Cir. 2019). 22 Spokane Valley Homeless Action Plan (SVHAP) options along the entire spectrum, bottlenecks will occur and reduce our ability to achieve our goal of reducing homelessness. A regional approach to addressing homelessness is necessary to make progress in this area. Homelessness is not the problem of a single jurisdiction and does not start or stop at the border between cities. The current system of competing governing bodies and priorities has led to a disjointed approach that can result in confusion, inefficiency, and criticisms. The entire region would benefit from a coordinated approach. The City will continue to work collaboratively with area stakeholders to improve communication and collaboration around efforts to reduce homelessness. Additionally, the City will continue to plan and implement our own plan for addressing homelessness within our own borders. 23 Spokane Valley Homeless Action Plan (SVHAP) Supporting Data — Current Status as of 2022 Before understanding the scope of need or being able to identify actions within the three primary objectives, the existing status of those experiencing homelessness, the number, type, and location of services available within the City and surrounding region, and available funding must be understood. A. Measuring Homelessness and Housing Instability: Getting an accurate count of how many individuals are experiencing homelessness and housing instability in our community at any given time is a challenge. The itinerant nature of homelessness and instability combined with lack of resources means those experiencing homelessness or instability are often constantly on the move. Those living in vehicles often find out -of -the way places to park to avoid conflicts, making it difficult to get an accurate count. individuals or families who are doubled -up, couch surfing, or living in hotels are often overlooked and go uncounted. Those experiencing housing instability are at much higher risk of becoming homeless, or may lapse back and forth from unstably housed to homelessness as circumstances and weather change. Because the City's homeless program is still new, we have not yet been able to collect sufficient data within our City limits to fully understand homelessness in our City. The apps that were developed are currently being used by the outreach team, and should be available to additional City partners in months to come, is an important step in the right direction. The data we have collected so far has proven useful in helping us understand homelessness in the City, and tracking our interactions and work with those we encounter. As we continue to make strides and collect more data about homelessness in the City, we will use the information to inform future planning and execution. Despite these challenges, the City has collected data from several sources that help to inform our understanding of the scope of homelessness in our community. The following identifies information about the number of homeless within the City and greater Spokane region. Annual Point In Time (PIT) Count The annual PIT count is a County -wide effort carried out over a five-day period each winter. Those who are sheltered (staying in a shelter) and unsheltered are counted. The 202PIT count found 2,3901,757 homeless individuals in the County, a 36% increase over 2022. Of all those counted, of which 955 were unhoused. This unhoused population represents a 164% increase over 2022 numbers, and a 76.5% increase sincefrom thc last timc thc PIT was conductcd in 2020. Using numbers from the most recent year that more granular data is available, oQf the 823 unhoused individuals counted in 2022, 80 were counted in Spokane Valley. Further, 13% of respondents indicated that the City of Spokane Valley was the last place they were housed before experiencing homelessness. The City participates in the effort by dedicating staff time and recruiting volunteers to ensure an accurate count of those experiencing homelessness in Spokane Valley. State data on homelessness and housing instability 24 Spokane Valley Homeless Action Plan (SVHAP) Since 2014 the WA State Department of Commerce has produced the Snapshot of Homelessness report, which is designed to supplement the annual PIT count. The Snapshot report includes those who may not fit HUD's strict definition of homelessness, such as families doubled -up or youth who are couch surfing. These unstably housed groups are omitted from the annual PIT count. The Snapshot draws from data of those receiving public assistance, Medicaid -funded medical care, or housing services. According to the Snapshot report, in January of 2022 Spokane County had 16,946 households that were either homeless or unstably housed. This number bolsters the argument that the PIT is a significant undercount of those experiencing homelessness in our community.17 County -wide housing instability survey and rental assistance report The County's rental assistance programs also provide data to learn more about those experiencing housing instability in Spokane Valley. According to reporting from Spokane County, there were 2,448 households in Spokane Valley that received rental assistance through one of six recent assistance programs. The Zone in Northeast Spokane was recently commissioned to conduct a survey looking at housing instability in the county and received 1,476 responses. Of respondents who indicated they lived in a Spokane Valley zip code, 38% indicated they were worried about an eviction, 40% said they had taken out a loan to pay rent, and 62% had skipped paying two or more bills to pay rent. School district statistics Spokane Valley school districts each have staff dedicated to counting and working with students who meet the McKinney-Vento Act definition of homelessness. The HUD definition of homelessness only counts those who are literally homeless, in a shelter, or fleeing domestic violence; the McKinney-Vento Act counts those as homeless who are without a stable night-time residence. This would include students who are couch surfing with friends, living in hotels, or moving from location to location, either on their own or with family members. Using this metric, we know that in 2021-22 the City of Spokane Valley had 780 homeless students, at least 168 of whom were 'unaccompanied minors', meaning they were without any family support. City data collection tools While the PIT Count and CMIS provide regional data about the number of homeless within the County, the City has developed several in-house tools to collect and track data related to homelessness to improve our understanding of the scope of homelessness within the City. One tool is used to perform short surveys to collect required data for funders, such as race, gender and income. Additional questions seek to learn when a person became homeless, where they were last housed, and if they identify any mental health or substance use issues. The tool also identifies a geographic location of where the data was collected. This tool helps the City gain a better understanding of how many people are experiencing homelessness in 17 GAO Report to Congress Finds Increase in Homelessness, Likely Undercount by HUD I National Low Income Housing Coalition (nlihc.org) 25 Spokane Valley Homeless Action Plan (SVHAP) Spokane Valley, who they are, how often we interact with them, and where they are located. This location - based information can quickly summarize the extent of homelessness in our community providing data to redirect services, funding, and resources as necessary. Another tool is used to document camp locations (both occupied and abandoned), trash, vehicles (occupied or abandoned), or other quality of life concerns. This tool is available to City staff and relevant partners, such as the Spokane Valley Police Department and work crews to facilitate coordination of abatement where necessary. Community Management Information System (CMIS) The CMIS system is the central database used to track and refer clients in the regional homeless system. Most service providers and funders, including the City, are part of the CM IS system. While some notable providers such as the Union Gospel Mission do not add data to CM IS, it is the primary source of data to understand how many people in the homeless community are accessing shelter, receiving housing referrals and housing placements, and to inventory for related services. Outreach team feedback Finally, the City's Homeless Outreach Specialist and Outreach Officer provide critical insight into trends and activities related to homelessness within the City. These 'boots on the ground' are the primary way we contact unhoused individuals and connect them to services, and are critical for understanding the changes in patterns and trends related to homelessness in our community. They are also primarily responsible for gathering data through the City's collection tools. B. Types and Causes of Homelessness: A University of Pennsylvania paper breaks homelessness down into three useful classifications that are often used when thinking about how to address the problem18: chronic, transitional, and episodic. These classifications, each defined by the duration of homelessness experienced and the range of supportive services needed, can be useful in identifying gaps in services and for prioritizing resources. Chronic homelessness is defined by HUD as a person who has experienced homelessness continuously for at least 12 months, or on at least four separate occasions in the last three years, where the combined occasions total a length of time of at least 12 months. Chronic homelessness has a greater environmental and economic impact on cities than short term homelessness, and engenders more complaints and community concerns. When people think about homelessness, this is often what comes to mind. 18 Kuhn, R., & Culhane, D. P. (1998). Applying Cluster Analysis to Test a Typology of Homelessness by Pattern of Shelter Utilization: Results from the Analysis of Administrative Data. Retrieved from https://repository.upenn.edu/spp_papers/96 26 Spokane Valley Homeless Action Plan (SVHAP) Transitional homelessness is defined as a person experiencing homelessness for a short period of time, often as the result of a major life change or catastrophic event such as losing a job, a medical condition or domestic abuse. Those who are experiencing transitional homelessness may be employed but unable to pay rent, may be living in a vehicle, or might be staying briefly in a shelter or temporary housing system. Episodic homelessness is defined as a person who has experienced homelessness for up to 60 days, has had two or more moves in the last 60 days, or who is likely to continue to be unstably housed because of disability or barriers to employment. Those experiencing episodic homelessness lap in and out of homelessness over a period of months or years. Those working to address homelessness often refer to a fourth category as well, which is hidden homelessness. People experiencing hidden homelessness are in temporary living situations without clear plans to obtain stable, long-term housing. This would include people who are couch surfing, living in hotels, or doubled -up with family and friends. People in this situation are often missed, as they may not access homelessness resources and are not counted during the PIT. Realistically, we have no idea how many people in our community may fit into this category. Lack of Affordable Housing Lack of affordable housing is also a significant contributor to homelessness. The Spokane region has been experiencing a housing crisis for years, with the supply of affordable housing falling far short of the documented need in our community. As a result, the cost for rental housing has increased significantly squeezing out many individuals and families who were already living on the margins. In 2021, rents increased by 23.8% in the region, with the median price for a one -bedroom unit increasing to $965, and $1,327 for a two -bedroom unit19. According to the City of Spokane Valley's (COSV) Housing Action Plan, in 2021, approximately 48% of Spokane Valley renters were cost burdened (paying more than 30% of income on housing), and 25% of renters were severely cost burdened (paying more than 50% of income on housing). A paper by the Federal Reserve indicates that families with children are most likely to be rent -burdened, followed by seniors. It further states "when households devote a large share of income to rent, an unexpected shortfall in income may leave them unable to pay rent and could lead to eviction. Moreover, households that have little income left after paying rent may not be able to afford other necessities, such as food, clothes, health care, and transportation. The large share of income required for housing also limits the ability to save and accumulate wealth."20 The Government Accountability Office (GAO) published a report in August of 2020 with a statistical analysis that found median rent increases of $100 a month were associated with a 9% increase in homelessness in the areas they examined.21 In their book, Homelessness Is a Housinq Problem, the 19 https://www.apartmentlist.com/wa/spokane#rent-report 20 "Assessing the Severity of Rent Burden on Low -Income Families:: Larrimore, Jeff and Schuetz, Jenny, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. 21 GAO-20-433, HOMELESSNESS: Better HUD Oversight of Data Collection Could Improve Estimates of Homeless Population 27 Spokane Valley Homeless Action Plan (SVHAP) University of Washington professor Gregg Colburn and the data scientist Clayton Page Aldern demonstrate that "the homelessness crisis in coastal cities cannot be explained by disproportionate levels of drug use, mental illness, or poverty." Rather, the most relevant factors in the homelessness crisis are rent prices and vacancy rates.22 While the experience of coastal cities may not specifically address the situation in Spokane County, the finding that poverty, drug use, and mental illness are not the cause of growing homelessness in the region's most populous cities does provide some added context and understanding of what we are experiencing in this City, as we have also seen rapidly increasing rent prices and historically low vacancy rates. The University of Washington's Washington Center for Real Estate Research has developed a Housing Affordability Indices (HAI) that looks at the extent to which housing is over or under priced when compared to incomes.23 A Value of 100 on the HAI Index means that a household with a median income has exactly enough income to qualify for a mortgage on a median priced home. An index value above 100 indicates that a household earning the median income has more than enough to qualify for a mortgage on a median priced home. For example, a composite HAI of 115 means that a household earning the median family income, has 115% of the income required to qualify for a conventional mortgage. Alternatively, a value of 85.0 would indicate that the household only has 85% of the income required to qualify for a mortgage on a median priced home. Graph A, taken from the 202 PIT count data, shows the relationship between housing affordability and homelessness. As housing affordability (represented by the HAI line) decreases (becomes less affordable), homelessness (represented by the PIT line) experienced a corresponding increase. While many of the people experiencing homelessness in our region today may not have been in the market to purchase a home, we know that when households who would have previously been in a position to purchase are forced instead to rent, it puts added pressure on the rental market and drives rent costs up and vacancies down for everyone.24 Many individuals experiencing homelessness receive Social Security/Disability or some other sort of monthly benefit, such as VA benefits, or are even employed. In fact, according to the City's own data collected between May and October of 2022, over 36% of the individuals experiencing homelessness in Spokane Valley, had some sort of income. While in the past a fixed income or the earnings for someone working a low -wage job may have been sufficient to pay for a modest one or two -bedroom apartment, the increase in housing market rates has priced many of these people out of the market and into homelessness. 22 The Obvious Answer to Homelessness - The Atlantic 23 Housing Affordability Indices I (uw.edu) 24 Soaring home prices are pushing buyers to the rental market - Vox; 61% of renters in the US can't afford to buy a home in their city (nypost.com); Concern Over Rent Ticking Time Bomb Sparks Creation Of New Schemes (realestate.com.au) 28 Spokane Valley Homeless Action Plan (SVHAP) Graph A: 250 3000 2390 2500 2000 200 cu +?'150 co 0 a moo .L 0 50 175 65.5 1500d • 1000 70 500 0 0 Ol Ol 0 0 N N CO CO Cr Cr LO LO l0 l0 N N 00 00 m m 0 0 N N CO 0 0 ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci N N N N N N N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N HAI* PIT Linear (HAI*) Linear (PIT) H a Mental Health/Substance Use/Disabilities Many of the Spokane Valley homeless population suffer from mental illness, a substance use disorder, and/or some form of disability. Self -reporting data from the 2022 PIT count found that 31% of adults reported serious mental illness, versus 4% of Spokane County residents in 2020. Twenty-three percent of adults reported a substance use disorder, compared to an average of 9% state-wide between 2014-2017. These realities are related to homelessness for many of the unhoused members of our community. This underscores the need to address homelessness from an approach led by those with experience in trauma, addiction, and mental illness, such as specially trained social workers, working in conjunction with law enforcement. It also underscores the need for an approach that can help individuals address a wide range of needs when transitioning out of homelessness. 29 Spokane Valley Homeless Action Plan (SVHAP) Family Conflict and Domestic Violence Family conflict has been identified as another significant contributor to homelessness, particularly among youth and young adults. Similarly, domestic violence is another major contributor to homelessness in our community. Homeless individuals are approximately ten times more likely to be survivors of domestic violence than the general population of Spokane County25. C. Spokane County Shelter Network: A necessary component of planning is to identify existing resources. The following table describes existing shelters within Spokane County. Of note for this plan, there are currently no existing overnight shelters located within Spokane Valley. Table A: Spokane County Shelter Inventory Name/Location Population Served # Beds Available* Entry Requirements** Notes House of Charity Men & Women 158 Low barrier 23 beds are for respite and are set aside for contracted partners like Providence or Community Court. Cannon St. Shelter (owned by City of Spokane) Men & Women 80 Low barrier Closed in April 2023, but may re -open as a respite/care shelter —TBD. Trent Resource and Assistance Center (TRAC) (owned by City of Spokane) Men & Women .450 Low barrier Ablc to flcx up to 275 bcds at currcnt staffing Icvcls (as of Nov 2022} Salvation Army Way Out Bridge Housing Men & Women 60 High Barrier, by referral only 30 Phase II beds, and 30 Phase III beds Salvation Army Family Shelter Men & Women 12 High Barrier, by referral only Time -limited, off-line at the time of this writing (November 2022) Truth Ministries Men only 66 Low barrier Check-in/check-out times. No pets allowed. The City contracts for two dedicated beds. UGM Men only 200 High barrier 60-day time -limit unless client is making progress on goals 25 Data from Spokane County's 2022 Point In Time Count 30 Spokane Valley Homeless Action Plan (SVHAP) and working to get into another UGM program. Hope House Women only 100 Low barrier 80 beds are standard shelter beds, and 20 beds are set aside for respite and are held/paid for by partners who refer women with specific needs. 1 bed contracted/set aside for CoSV. YWCA Women & their children only 37 Only for those fleeing DV. Low barrier Household makeup determines bed availability, so sometimes fewer than 37 beds available. UGM Women & their children only 222 High barrier 60-day time -limit unless client is making progress on goals and working to get into another UGM program. St Margaret's Shelter Families only 17 rooms By referral only. Must have a child in custody at least 51% of time, or pregnant. Low- barrier 8 rooms are Transitional Housing rooms (up to 6 months) — prioritizes 18-24yo, or actively fleeing DV. 9 rooms are emergency shelter, w/30 daytime limit with possibility of extension. Family Promise Emergency Shelter Families only 104 Low -barrier Currently seeking funding to expand capacity by 25 beds Crosswalk Teens only (13-17yo) 18 Low barrier Young Adult Shelter Young adults only (18-24yo) 44 Low barrier *Number of beds available has fluctuated with restrictions and additional funding related to the COVID- 19 pandemic. **Low Barrier means there are no sobriety or referral requirements for entry. High Barrier shelters may require sobriety to access services and/or a referral. D. Available Services: Current City Positions/Contract Services City Staff The City of Spokane Valley has been building a housing and homelessness program even prior to development of this plan. The Housing and Homeless (H&H) Coordinator position was created in 2021 31 Spokane Valley Homeless Action Plan (SVHAP) and represented an acknowledgement of and investment in addressing the issue of homelessness within the City. Similarly, in 2022, the City created a full-time Homeless Outreach Officer position within the Spokane Valley Police Department and the City applied for and received a Spokane County Homeless Housing Assistance Act grant for a full-time Outreach Specialist. The Outreach Specialist is an employee of Spokane Valley Partners but works as a team member with the Homeless Services Officer and H&H Coordinator as part of the City's outreach team. These positions form the core of the homeless response team for the City. Other City departments and staff also support the City's efforts to address homelessness. Code Enforcement regularly partners with the H&H Coordinator to address issues such as individuals sleeping in vehicles, encampments on private property, and clean-up of trash. The Street Division assists with locating and removing encampments under bridges or on other street infrastructure. The Economic Development Department assists with the creation and dissemination of materials such as resource guides and media releases related to homelessness and the City's efforts to address it. Contracted Services The City of Spokane Valley Police Department and Spokane Valley Fire Protection District No. 1 ("Spokane Valley Fire Department"), a separate municipal entity, each devote significant time and effort to dealing with issues related to homelessness in our community. From responding to Crime Check calls to providing critical medical interventions, community resources go to addressing the impacts of homelessness in our community every day. The dedicated Homeless Outreach Officer is specifically assigned to address concerns around homelessness, and the Crime Prevention Officer spends significant time working with businesses and residents to mitigate the impacts of homelessness on private property. The City has committed to cleaning up camps and trash on city -owned properties. The City spends thousands of dollars annually contracting with work crews to remove camps and trash related to homelessness. A work crew from the Geiger corrections facility has been the primary partner the City contracts with to perform this work. However, due to staffing issues and rules around when the Geiger crew is available, the City also contracts with local businesses to perform this work, Regional Services The City pays into the regional system that funds projects addressing homelessness county -wide. Through recording fees and other funding mechanisms, the City contributes a significant amount of funds each year that go to a variety of programs benefiting Spokane Valley residents. The following table details the programs funded and number of recipients served through Housing and Homeless Assistance Act (HHAA) funding, of which the City is the County's single largest contributing municipality. Table B: Jan 2020 - Dec Beneficiaries Total Verified Total Grand Total % of 2021 HHAA Originating County Beneficiaries Beneficiaries verified/reported Subrecipients from the City Beneficiaries Reported Reported County Reported from (includes beneficiaries 32 Spokane Valley Homeless Action Plan (SVHAP) of Spokane Valley Unknown Locations Unknown Locations) served from CoSV St. Margaret's Shelter, ES & TH Services 70 119 1,249 1,368 5.1% Family Promise - Open Doors Shelter 52 70 1,356 1,426 3.6% The Salvation Army ES & TH Services 33 62 212 274 12.0% Volunteers of America Hope House 43 76 3 79 54.4% Volunteers of America Crosswalk 300 456 0 456 65.8% SNAP County Outreach 265 330 189 519 51.1% YWCA Safe Shelter for Survivors and Children 59 107 0 107 55.1% House of Charity Emergency Shelter 157 361 1,335 1,696 9.3% Spokane Workforce Council Prevention 46 87 243 330 13.9% Family Promise - Bridges Program 0 0 0 36 NA — Subrecipient did not record/report location data Total Beneficiaries Served by Area from Jan 2020 - Dec 2021 1,025 1,668 4,587 6,291 16.3% Looking at the data in Table C, it is important to acknowledge that over 4,500 beneficiaries were from unknown locations, and that the Family Promise Bridges Program did not collect or report this data. It is safe to assume, then, that some percentage of the recipients from unknown locations were also from the City, which would make the total of City residents served even greater than the 1,025 individuals identified in these numbers. Of the location -based services listed above (which does not include Outreach), only the YWCA has a site located within the City. This means that City residents seeking these services are required to navigate transportation and take additional time out of school or work, sometimes with children, to receive assistance. 33 Spokane Valley Homeless Action Plan (SVHAP) Regional Collaboration The City recognizes that the City of Spokane, Spokane County, and non-profit providers are already providing services throughout the region. Accordingly, the City acknowledges the work already occurring and participates in a variety of the existing regional entities and efforts related to homelessness. Identification of existing regional and local efforts are critical so that the City's Plan does not overlap or create unnecessary duplication with existing services and solutions. The following list identifies certain key existing regional and local efforts related to homelessness: • Spokane County: Spokane County administers a variety of housing funding programs, including Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and Homeless Housing Assistance Act (HHAA) funds through the Spokane County Housing and Community Development Advisory Committee (HCDAC). While the City is eligible to become an entitlement jurisdiction and to receive CDBG funds directly, it has not done so to date and relies on an interlocal agreement with Spokane County to assist in distribution of CDBG funds towards City projects and purposes. Further, HHAA funds administered by Spokane County include funds collected from recording fees collected from Spokane Valley residents. In order to provide City input in the distribution of CDBG and HHAA funds, the City has four representatives on the HCDAC. While the City has representatives on the HCDAC, the City does not have direct control over the distribution of CDBG or HHAA funds. As the SVHAP is implemented, the City might consider assuming direct control over CDBG and HHAA funds in order to fund identified City programs or projects. The City also participates in distribution of Consolidated Homeless Grant (CHG) funding. The City has also participated in regional discussions about use of state funding to address homelessness on State-owned right-of- way property. • Continuum of Care (CoC): The CoC is a regional planning board made up of service providers, elected officials, community members, educators, businesses and other stakeholders. Broadly, the purpose of the CoC is "to promote community -wide planning and strategic use of resources to address homelessness; improve coordination and integration with mainstream resources and other programs targeted to people experiencing homelessness; improve data collection and performance measurement; and allow each community to tailor its program to the particular strengths and challenges within that community."26 The CoC is responsible for administering all HUD funds related to homelessness that come to the county. It is also responsible for developing the region's 5-Year Strategic Plan to Prevent and End Homelessness. This plan lays out a roadmap for a regional response to homelessness, and provides guidelines that any program funded through HUD or applicable County dollars must follow when providing homeless services. City funds that go to the County to support homeless services are bound by the requirements laid out in the Plan. The City of Spokane is currently the CoC's "Collaborative Applicant," meaning they receive a portion of funding to provide much of the staffing and technical support for the CoC's funding applications, monitoring, evaluation, and reporting requirements. The H&H Coordinator is co-chair of the CoC's Singles Sub -Committee. This sub -committee, along with Veterans, 26 Introductory Guide to the Continuum of Care (CoC) Program (spokanecity.org) 34 Spokane Valley Homeless Action Plan (SVHAP) Families, and Youth sub -committees, is one of four permanent sub -committees tasked with informing and making recommendations to the CoC regarding the region's response to homelessness. The City is also represented in the CoC with a board member selected from the City Council. • Local groups/committees: The H&H Coordinator leads a monthly Valley Huddle meeting which brings together key stakeholders, including: Spokane Valley Police Department, Spokane Valley Fire Department, Spokane Valley Schools, Spokane Valley Partners, Spokane Valley Community Advocates, Catholic Charities, Volunteers of America, Spokane Neighborhood Action Partners, Frontier Behavioral Health, Washington State Parks, Department of Natural Resources, Washington Department of Transportation, Spokane Valley Parks, Spokane Regional Health District, United Way, Spokane Valley Library, Greater Good Northwest, Pioneer Human Services, interested Spokane Valley citizens, and others. The focus of these meetings is to discuss updates, challenges, and approaches to addressing homelessness in Spokane Valley. The City also participates in the Greater Valley Service Network, and regularly works with the Greater Spokane Valley Chamber of Commerce ("Valley Chamber") to provide information and address business concerns. • Regional events and initiatives: The City has supported and participated in a number of regional events and initiatives related to homelessness. The City participated in planning and day -of implementation of the regional Homeless Connect event which connects people to services and supports the regional Point In Time Count effort. In 2022, the CoSV fully participated in the annual PIT count for the first time, recruiting volunteers and focusing on Valley -specific locations to ensure a more accurate count than in years past when Spokane Valley was largely overlooked. • Collaboration with affordable housing developers: The City has initiated conversations and developed relationships with affordable housing developers like Spokane Housing Authority, Habitat for Humanity, and Community Frameworks. The City recognizes that more affordable housing is needed in our community, and that it is critical to develop and move projects forward that can add needed units to the City's housing stock that are affordable for all income levels. E. Available Funding: The following table outlines the different sources of revenue available to support programming to address homelessness: 35 Spokane Valley Homeless Action Plan (SVHAP) Table C: Funding currently collected by the City Funding Source Funding Eligibility Summary of Allowable Uses Funding Amount collected/available (2021)* Funding Access Local Homeless Housing Assistance Act (HHAA) Recording Fees** • Homelessness • Affordable Housing Portion of $8 and $62 document recording fees for affordable housing and homeless programs (capital; O&M; variety of services) Collected by the City and transferred to the County under interlocal agreement. City may apply for a portion of the funds, along with all 12 participating municipalities in the County. Affordable and Supportive Housing Sales and Use Tax Credit • Affordable Housing 0.0073% sales tax rebate for funding affordable housing $449,000 available now, and approximately $222,000 additional per year. Internally available for City use within State guidelines. American Rescue Plan Act • Homelessness • Affordable Housing Federal funds for COVID-19; assumes services provided for homelessness and increasing access to affordable housing $16,000,000 One-time funds only. Internally available for City use within Federal guidelines. Funding currently collected by the County Funding Source Funding Eligibility Summary of Allowable Uses Funding Amount collected/available (2021) Funding Access Affordable Housing for All County Recording Fee Surcharge • Homelessness • Affordable Housing $13 recording fee primarily for affordable housing, can be used for shelter operating costs (no capital use); no direct City use — allows use by County through interlocal agreement. The County allocates funds to participating cities for eligible housing activities pursuant to an interlocal agreement. The City must work with the County to enter into an agreement for use of these funds. Consolidated Homeless Grant (CHG) • Homelessness Grants available for homeless programs The City must apply to the County to access this funding. 36 Spokane Valley Homeless Action Plan (SVHAP) Available funding sources currently not collected/accessed Funding Source Funding Eligibility Summary of Allowable Uses Funding Amount collected/available (2021) Funding Access General Property Taxes (banked, levy lid lifts) • Homelessness • Affordable Housing City discretion to raise general fund dollars for either affordable housing or homelessness purposes (capital; O&M; other services). Would require Council to follow the normal levy - setting process, and requires no special procedure nor voter approval. Affordable Housing Levy • Affordable Housing Property tax of up to $0.50 per $1,000 assessed value for 10 consecutive years for affordable housing programs. Council must first declare an emergency regarding the stock of affordable housing, then voters must approve the levy by a simple majority. Sales and Use Tax for Housing Related Services • Homelessness • Affordable Housing 0.1% sales and use tax for funding affordable housing and emergency, transitional, and supportive housing. Can also use for mental and behavioral health - related uses. The City may impose the tax by either a majority of persons voting, or through councilmanic action. REET II Funds to Support Affordable Housing and Homelessness • Homelessness • Affordable Housing Authorization to use 25% or $100,000 (whichever is greater) for capital projects related to affordable housing and homelessness. The City may only use REET II funds for homelessness if it documents in its capital facilities plan that it has enough funds over the next two years for capital projects identified in state code, which include "planning, acquisition, construction, reconstruction, repair, replacement, rehabilitation, or improvement of streets, roads, sidewalks...storm and sanitary sewer systems", etc. 37 Spokane Valley Homeless Action Plan (SVHAP) Housing Trust Fund Grants • Homelessness • Affordable Housing Grants available to local governments for projects related to affordable housing or homelessness; priority given to non -profits and housing authorities. To date the City has never received Housing Trust Fund dollars. Tax Increment • Affordable Funds public Must be established by Financing (TIF) Housing improvements of designated areas, including the purchase, rehabilitation, retrofit for energy efficiency, and construction of affordable housing. Council ordinance. The TIF boundary area cannot be the entire city jurisdiction, and a jurisdiction cannot have more than two active TIFs at any given time. *With the exception of one-time ARPA funding and the Affordable and Supportive Housing Sales and Use Tax Credit, the City does not directly collect or distribute the funds listed in this table. More data is needed regarding available amounts as the City moves to implement the SVHAP. **These funds are passed to Spokane County through an interlocal agreement, and then distributed to programs that benefit the county at large, including the City of Spokane Valley. F. Existing Goals Related to Homelessness: The City has already adopted several planning documents that include goals related to addressing homelessness. Among these documents are the City's Comprehensive Plan and Business Plan. Beginning with the goals in these plans can serve as a starting point for setting objectives for 2023 and beyond. What follows are goals related to addressing homelessness outlined in these existing plans. In the Comprehensive Plan, the following goals are listed under the "Housing Goals" heading: • H-G4: Work collaboratively with local stakeholders to develop a Homeless Response System specific to the needs of the Valley • H-G5: Work closely with and support the Regional Homeless System and ensure continuity of care for community members that are unsheltered and unstably housed in the Valley and throughout our region In the Comprehensive Plan, the following goals are listed under the "Housing Policies" heading: • H-P8: Ensure the provision of homeless and housing services have commensurate on -site support to maintain the character of neighborhoods and minimize public service calls. • H-P11: Engage in active recruitment of service providers that desire to serve Valley residents through targeted programs focused on homeless service delivery. 38 Spokane Valley Homeless Action Plan (SVHAP) • H-P12: Support the implementation of the Continuum of Care Five -Year Strategic Plan to End Homelessness. • H-P13: Continue as active members on regional committees that address homelessness and housing instability such as the Continuum of Care Board and the Housing and Community Development Advisory Committee. • H-P15: Encourage and support new projects and programs which seek to assist in maintaining housing stability or provide exits from homelessness to housing. • H-P16: Analyze and collect data through our local Community Management Information System and use this data to help drive homeless and housing policy In the Comprehensive Plan, the following goals are listed under the "Approach to the Housing Element" heading: Co -Location of Homeless and Homeless Prevention Services The City of Spokane Valley has a strong network of various non -profits, faith -based organizations and school districts that help serve those who are facing housing instability as well as households that are unsheltered. What has historically been missing are locations in the City where access to these services are easily obtainable. Specifically, a high degree of reliance has been on the City of Spokane to physically house these services, which in turn requires City of Spokane Valley residents to travel when resources are needed. The City supports co -location facilities in its jurisdiction within close proximity of public transportation. These facilities would house various providers that seek to serve those experiencing homelessness and housing instability. Additionally, such services should be well connected to existing systems of care within our region to encourage and support ease of referrals and reduction of duplication in services. Supporting Affordable Housing for all Households The provision of Affordable Housing is critical to meet the needs of those households that have special needs or are on fixed incomes. Any build out of Affordable Housing in the City should align with existing programs and systems that seek to serve those that are unsheltered or unstably housed. The City should strive to work with regional providers to streamline and coordinate the distribution of limited resources. In the Business Plan, the following goals are listed under the "Homelessness Oversight" heading: • Work in conjunction with the City Attorney's Office to revise and implement the City's Camping Ordinance. • Provide staff support to the Continuum of Care and the development of the 5-Year Plan to Prevent and End homelessness. • Provide Staff Support for the Spokane County Housing and Community Development Advisory Committee and the development of the 5-Year Consolidated Plan. • Collaborate with Spokane County and the City of Spokane to incorporate a transitional bridge shelter and young adult shelter into the regional homelessness system. 39 Spokane Valley Homeless Action Plan (SVHAP) • Participate, review proposals, monitor, and evaluate performance of service providers receiving Homeless Housing Assistance Act funding from recording fees, Consolidated Homeless Grant funding, and Housing and Urban Development funding. • Create, implement and manage a Spokane Valley Homelessness Huddle Team consisting of Police, Fire, Parks, City Attorney, Contract Administration and Homeless Outreach Services with the purpose of exiting individuals from homelessness and maintaining public space for intended uses by all citizens. • Identify and engage with homeless individuals located in Spokane Valley, creating and maintaining a database of individuals and campsites allowing for effective and consistent outreach services. Progress has already been made on some of these goals, such as managing the Homeless Huddle group, and collecting data on individuals experiencing homelessness and locations where it is occurring. Other goals are on -going, and do not have distinct ending points, such as supporting and participating in regional efforts through the Continuum of Care. Work in these ongoing areas will continue. Finally, some goals, such as the addition of sufficient affordable housing in the City are long-term goals that will take years to make significant process. F. Community Feedback The City has conducted several community outreach efforts to solicit feedback about priorities and preferences for action related to addressing homelessness in Spokane Valley. A survey conducted by the City in 2021 asked a number of questions related to residents' experiences with homelessness in the community, and their preferences for possible services and interventions. The survey received 318 responses. A Community open house in March 2023 attracted over 60 participants to prioritize strategies. Results From The Community Survey 50.00% 40.00% 30.00% 20.00% 10.00% 0.00% How often do you come upon unsheltered individuals in our City? ■ Responses 1-3 times per week 4-6 times per week Daily Never 1 40 Spokane Valley Homeless Action Plan (SVHAP) 70.00% 60.00% 50.00% 40.00% 30.00% 20.00% 10.00% 0.00% Would you support small (less than 20 individuals) separated emergency or temporary housing throughout the City in locations served by public transit? Yes No Other (please specify) E Responses 50.00% 45.00% 40.00% 35.00% 30.00% 25.00% 20.00% 15.00% 10.00% 5.00% 0.00% Please rank your preference for locating emergency shelters for adult singles/couples. 1 Small facilities in existing neighborhoods a single-family house, duplex, or apartment unit In a facility that can accommodate many people along a corridor served by transit Wherever a service provider wants to build and/or locate the facility Other 1 (least preferred) 2 3 4 (most preferred) 41 Spokane Valley Homeless Action Plan (SVHAP) 70.00% 60.00% 50.00% 40.00% 30.00% 20.00% 10.00% 0.00% Please rank your preference for locating a Day Drop in Center (a facility devoted to providing day time shelter and resources for those currently unsheltered) 50.00% 45.00% 40.00% 35.00% 30.00% 25.00% 20.00% 15.00% 10.00% 5.00% 0.00% Close proximity to Close proximity to known Other emergency shelters encampments 1 (least preferred) 2 3 (most preferred) What should the City's role be in response to homelessness and/or housing instability? The City should continue to participate in the existing regional system The City should only offer services for those living in the City The City should partner with the County Responses 42 Spokane Valley Homeless Action Plan (SVHAP) Priorities Identified At The Community Open House Attendees of the community open house were asked to give feedback of the draft Homeless Action Plan. As part of this process, they were given an opportunity to prioritize from a list of possible interventions and programs related to the three primary goals of the plan: Prevent homelessness, reduce existing homelessness, improve quality of life for all Spokane Valley Residents. A number of the strategies described overlap between several of the goals. Increasing housing availability and affordability, for example, is relevant to both preventing homelessness from occurring, and reducing existing levels of homelessness. The following strategies were highlighted as priorities by those who attended the open house: Short -Term Interventions — Make Contact and Form Connections — 170 votes The creation of a day drop -in center inside the City, and support for mental health and addiction crisis interventions received 46 votes each. Creating a day drop -in center falls under reducing homelessness as it creates a space to connect with people and follow-up on needed services. It also falls under improving quality of life because it would create a space for those experiencing homelessness to be during the day instead of in businesses, or public facilities like the library. While expanding mental health and addiction crisis interventions is critical for reducing existing levels of homelessness, it would also be an important tool to helping some people avoid becoming homeless. In this category outreach and case management received 33 votes, and youth/family service centers received 20 votes. Increase Housing Availability and Affordability— 72 votes Within this category of interventions the specific strategy of "RelaxFing] codes to allow for more types of housing in more areas, including off-street parking requirements that increase the cost of new developments" receiving 26 of the 72 votes. Increasing housing availability and affordability falls under both the goal of preventing homelessness, and the goal of reducing existing homelessness. Ensuring that people on fixed incomes or working lower -wage jobs can afford to stay in their homes is critical to stemming the future tide of homelessness. And ensuring that there are units that those working their way out of homelessness can afford when they are ready is necessary if we are to reduce existing levels of homelessness. Requiring new multi -family developments to include a certain percentage of affordable units was the next highest vote -getter in this category, receiving 9 votes. Develop Supportive Housing Options — 44 votes 43 Spokane Valley Homeless Action Plan (SVHAP) The third most popular category of interventions had to do with providing more housing options to support those that need higher levels of assistance to remain stably housed. This group included Permanent Supportive Housing for individuals living with disabilities who also have a history of chronic homelessness and require more ongoing on -site case management (18 votes), as well as assisted living options for those with physical or mental impairments (16 votes for non -senior housing, 10 votes for senior -specific housing). Increase Income — 41 votes Helping residents increase their income through targeted job training and placement received 18 votes. Connecting them with Foundational Community Supports services to provide ongoing employment and housing support (similar to job and housing -specific case management) received 14 votes. And Helping those eligible for some sort of benefits like disability, veterans, or retirement benefits to connect to and receive those benefits received 9 votes. Medium -Term Interventions to Reduce Homelessness — 37 votes In this category of intervention there were three different strategies described: Utilizing the current homeless system housing referrals through Coordinated Entry (20 votes), bridge housing, which is generally high -barrier clean & sober shelters (9 votes), and transitional housing, which is generally also clean & sober housing but can last for up to two years while a person buildes a rental history, employment, etc (8 votes). SVHAP Feedback Outreach List This Plan was shared with representatives of the following stakeholders: • Spokane Valley Partners • Frontier Behavioral Health • Spokane Valley Fire Department • Spokane County Library District • Goodwill Industries of the Inland • Spokane Valley Community Northwest Advocates • Spokane Valley Police Department • United Way • Washington Department of • Spokane Dream Center Transportation • Greater Valley Support Network • Spokane Valley Parks Department • Central Valley School District • Washington State Parks • East Valley School District • Volunteers of America • West Valley School District • Catholic Charities Eastern • Continuum of Care board Washington • Jewels Helping Hands 44 Spokane Valley Homeless Action Plan (SVHAP) • Washington State Department of • Smith -Barbieri Progressive Fund Natural Resources • League of Women Voters • SNAP • YWCA • Family Promise • Greater Good Northwest • Reclaim Project • Providence • Community Frameworks • Empire Health Foundation • Habitat for Humanity • Spokane Housing Authority • Allusion Opps LLC • Spokane Valley community • Hello for Good members involved with the monthly • Spokane Valley Chamber of Valley Huddle Commerce • City of Spokane homeless services • Truth Ministries staff • Spokane Low Income Housing • Homeless Coalition Consortium Feedback was received from the following stakeholders: • Volunteers of America • Spokane Valley Police Department • Washington State Parks • Spokane Valley Partners • Family Promise • Spokane Low Income Housing • SNAP Consortium • Continuum of Care board, including • League of Women Voters Singles and veteran sub -committees • City of Spokane homeless services • Community Frameworks staff • Spokane Valley Chamber of • SpokAnimal Commerce • Community open house event with • Goodwill Industries of the Inland Northwest • Greater Valley Support Network -P. 2023 Work Plan Activities 60+ attendees • Multiple Spokane Valley residents While the SVHAP outlines a variety of needs, priorities and long-term or ongoing goals related to addressing homelessness in Spokane Valley, a set of short-term objectives or work plans for 2023 is needed to help guide work and make progress towards the longer -term goals. In 2023, short- term objectives include: 45 Spokane Valley Homeless Action Plan (SVHAP) 1. Award ARPA funding for Housing & Homelessness purposes Through the City's ARPA awards it is focused on bringing needed services and housing options to Spokane Valley and supporting regional efforts that address ongoing needs. The City Council has identified priorities for the ARPA funds, and City resources more generally. These priorities are preventing homelessness from occurring in the first place when possible, and support for families with minor dependents and for youth. With these priorities in mind, the Council awarded ARPA funds to the following agencies, in order of award size: • $1,460,000 to Reclaim Project The City has been expanding its partnership with Reclaim over the past year, and this ARPA award is a part of that growing relationship. The award will pay for two Transitional Housing locations in Spokane Valley for men, for the initial loan payment of a home base location in Spokane Valley, and several years of program staffing. With the for -profit component of the organization, after this initial investment it is anticipated that business income will be sufficient to fund all future programming. The City already contracts with Reclaim to provide weed abatement, graffiti removal, and clean-up services. The home base will not only serve as a location for programming like sobriety -based social groups, but will also provide a base of operations for their Valley work crews. Reclaim's Transitional Housing provides clean/sober living for the men in their program, and the for -profit work crews provide employment opportunities and purpose. The combination of accountable, community -focused housing along with employment has shown great results, and is in line with the City's philosophy of providing opportunities for those seeking to better their situation. There are already a number of men in Reclaim's programs who are from Spokane Valley, and who would have chosen to stay in our community if the option had been available. The City's Outreach Team will work closely with Reclaim to direct potential candidates from Spokane Valley into the new Transitional Housing options, helping to create more opportunities and options for those that the team encounters on a daily basis. • $1,095,000 to Family Promise of Spokane Family promise of Spokane (FPS) has been in contact with the City for some time regarding the need for family services in Spokane Valley. In 2023 Spokane County awarded funding to Family promise to purchase a Transitional Housing location in Spokane Valley for families. The City's ARPA award will ensure that families transitioning out of homelessness have access to the resources they need to be successful, as well as adequate staffing and administration for this program expansion. Through FPS' Spokane Valley location families will be served by school -based housing case management (in coordination with each School District's HEART McKinney-Vento liaisons), a landlord relationship coordinator who will help build relationships needed to get families into units, and direct client assistance to help families quickly overcome barriers to 46 Spokane Valley Homeless Action Plan (SVHAP) gaining and stabilizing housing such as assistance paying for critical documents, utilities, move -in costs, employment uniforms or equipment, etc. • $500,000 to Volunteers of America Eastern WA Volunteers of America (VOA) has been planning and raising funding for construction of a new youth (13 — 17 years old) shelter/program facility, called Crosswalk 2.0. The current shelter is located in the heart of downtown Spokane, which is recognized as creating significant safety concerns for the children staying there. The new facility will be located near Spokane Community College and maintain 18 emergency shelter beds and add 18 additional "college dorm" beds for youth aged 16-20 who are enrolled in an educational program and/or employed to assist them in obtaining certificates/degrees and livable wage jobs. The new location will also be much closer to Spokane Valley, making its services more accessible for our City's youth. This project will be completed with significant financial support from Spokane County and City of Spokane as well, as it is a regional resource that aims to address a regional need. • $471,729 to Spokane Neighborhood Action Partners Spokane Neighborhood Action Partners (SNAP) was awarded a portion of their request for gap funding to complete the 60-unit Broadway Senior Housing project. The $24 million dollar project is being constructed on land already owned by SNAP, and will serve seniors at or below 60% of the Area Median Income (AMI), and charge no more than 30% of each tenant's income to ensure long-term affordability. All units will be accessible, allowing residents to age in place even with mobility changes. There will be a variety of community areas and amenities including a community room with a kitchen, on -site management, a Service Coordinator, small gathering spaces, walking paths, garden beds, laundry on each floor, free 24-hour monitored call system, and wi-fi throughout. • $471,728 to Habitat for Humanity Spokane Habitat for Humanity was awarded a portion of their request to fund land acquisition for the future development of affordable housing, specifically home ownership opportunities for households earning between 45%-65% of AMI. Habitat provides permanently affordable homeownership services in partnership to individuals and families that would not otherwise be able to qualify for a conventional mortgage. The program will serve those meeting income requirements, are experiencing housing instability due to inadequate/unsafe living conditions/overcrowding/homelessness, and agree to partner by contributing 250 hours of sweat equity, saving for closing costs, and completing partnership requirements. 47 Spokane Valley Homeless Action Plan (SVHAP) These awards reflect the priorities put forward by the City Council and will bring needed services and options to Spokane Valley for populations experiencing homelessness or at risk of homelessness, as well as supporting the addition of much -needed affordable units for seniors and home ownership opportunities for low-income families. 2. Research and make decision on use of HHAA recording fee funds. 3. Investigate a property acquisition for possible services in Spokane Valley. Connect with and recruit service providers to serve Spokane Valley residents. Work with regional bodies to promote solutions and serve Spokane Valley's unhoused population. 46, In collaboration with partners, assist 10 individuals experiencing homelessness in Spokane Valley in obtaining permanent housing. Continue developing and implementing a responsive, efficient process for removing trash, vehicles, encampments as necessary. Work with contracted crews, SCOPE volunteers, and outreach team to address issues on public lands, work with government agency partners to address issues on their properties, and code enforcement to address issues on private property. Collaborate with and support regional housing providers in creating 50 new affordable housing units. Implement one to two recommendations from the Housing Action Plan. 10. Create inventory tracking for the number of permanent affordable units in Spokane Valley, number of new units (affordable and market rate), and number of existing units converted to permanent affordable units. 48 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: May 30, 2023 Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ information ® admin. report Department Director Approval: ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Regional homeless collaboration update GOVERNING LEGISLATION: NA PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Administrative Report January 31, 2023; administrative report February 7, 2023; administrative report February 21, 2023; administrative report February 28, 2023; motion consideration for joint statement on March 21, 2023; administrative report May 16, 2023. BACKGROUND: As part of the City's ongoing discussions regarding its homelessness response, in the first quarter of 2023, the City Council voted to approve signing a joint statement considering a regional approach to homelessness along with the City of Spokane and Spokane County. That effort has been led by a volunteer group consisting of Gavin Cooley, former City of Spokane Chief Financial Officer; Rick Romero, former City of Spokane Director of Strategic Planning; and Theresa Sanders, former City of Spokane City Administrator. As part of the joint statement, the volunteer group and entities identified a 90-day "due diligence" period for elected officials and staff of the local governmental entities to meet regularly and study how such a regional collaborative approach might be organized and how it could work. This period was also intended to allow the volunteer group to meet with the business community and stakeholders who provide services and otherwise participate in the continuum of homeless services. Mayor Haley, Councilmember Hattenburg, Deputy City Manager Lamb, and City Engineer Mantz have been participating in bi-weekly regional homeless meetings. The discussion of the creation of the regional entity coincides with the development of the Spokane Valley Homeless Action Plan (SVHAP). The development of the City's plan along with the outcomes and goals for addressing homelessness will aid the City in consideration of the City's role in a possible regional approach. Further, our understanding is that even if a regional entity were formed, it would not preclude the City from providing certain services or addressing specific needs identified in the SVHAP. On May 16, 2023, Mr. Cooley discussed the progress towards the regional collaborative approach. At the Council meeting on May 30, 2023, Mr. Cooley will provide more information regarding the potential funding for the regional entity. It is important to note that the 90-day diligence period will culminate June 3, 2023. OPTIONS: Discussion. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Discussion. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: NA STAFF CONTACT: Gloria Mantz, City Engineer ATTACHMENTS: Joint Statement Spokane County SPOKANE JOINT STATEMENT March 3, 2023 okane� jUalley Collaborating for our Community Spokane regional elected leadership announces a 90-day due diligence period to evaluate options for a regional and collaborative model to improve our collective efforts to address homelessness and its impacts on our community. Our region's greatest strength is our ability to build community vitality through regional partnerships and collaboration, and now is the time to utilize that strength to more effectively and collaboratively address homelessness in our community. The Spokane region has a history of achieving big things when responsibility and successful outcomes are shared. Homelessness affects communities across the country, and Eastern Washington is no exception. One of the biggest challenges communities face in addressing homelessness, is that much of the homeless response system relies on many people and organizations working effectively across jurisdictions and with a regional focus. Together, we can better coordinate our resources invested in housing and human services, to successfully and efficiently address this crisis. As elected leaders, we know this isn't a political issue, it is a people issue, and it affects all of us in the Spokane region. We believe that working beyond political and jurisdictional boundaries may give us the best chance to build and deliver strategic and impactful solutions for our entire community for years to come. About our Collaborative Effort Developing an integrated strategy with shared responsibility is best achieved when all local elected officials work collaboratively. One initiative we will be assessing, modeled after successful campaigns in Houston and Atlanta, is an effort to establish an independent authority tasked with making strategic, coordinated decisions and investments, to achieve the best outcomes. The Spokane region is ready to work to establish our own model, one that best fits our community's needs and desires. We recognize that our many providers and other professionals throughout the homeless response system have worked diligently for many years, but often without the regional planning and support they've needed to achieve greater success. Such a collaborative effort could more effectively address these needs by properly aligning the region around strategies, funding, and many other resources, including the areas of health and services, housing, and public safety. Three community leaders, Gavin Cooley, Rick Romero, and Theresa Sanders have volunteered to help organize and guide this effort. Each has a variety of business and public sector experience, and together have worked on numerous successful regional collaborations. The Next 90 Days The first step towards developing a regional collaborative authority, is a 90-day due diligence period. During this time, community leaders and many stakeholder groups will work together as quickly as possible to identify how a regional and collaborative system could be created — a system that could be built on shared vision, finances, data, and other resources to optimize the address of homelessness and its impacts on our community. The due diligence period will focus on: 1. Reviewing potential legal structures for a regional effort, including pro/con evaluations, e.g. Public Development Authority (PDA), nonprofit, and others 2. Review and discussion of initial funding, costs and other financial information in support of a regional effort 3. Review and discussion of data collection and use in support of a regional effort 4. Reviewing potential governance models and best practices, including roles of jurisdictions, elected leaders and community stakeholders in coordination and support of a regional effort 5. Review and discussion of initial staffing in support of a regional effort 6. Review and discussion of how the success of a regional effort can be regularly quantified and evaluated Gathering comprehensive regional stakeholder input will be key to our success. Many different stakeholder groups, providers throughout the homeless response system, people with lived experience, our local Continuum of Care Board, local, state, and federal government agencies their staff and advisory boards, as well as businesses, and residents, will be encouraged to actively participate in this process. Throughout the due diligence period, there will be many avenues for community members to share their input and perspectives with elected and other leaders, including public forums and a website. Following the due diligence period, legislative bodies will evaluate the information developed and the likelihood of success for a regional collaborative authority model, and give consideration as to whether and to what degree to participate in the regional authority or other envisioned regional homelessness efforts. Together we can build a bright future for the Spokane region. Signed, Spokane County Mary"Kuney Commission Chair JOINT STATEMENT March 3, 2023 Collaborating for our Community Josh Kerns Al French Commission Commissioner Vice Chair 1./dZ61(%� CIA/1/1>69'er Amber Waldref Chris Jordan Commissioner Commissioner City of Spokane ailvd dine Woodward Mayor Michael Cathcart Councilmember ack ZAopdhe Cou Llmember City of Spokane Valley Pam Haley Mayor On Behalf of the City Council Bre an Beggs Council President Jo Councilmember Bej+lifcerson Lori Kinnear Councilmember Councilmember Karen Stratton Councilmember 4 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: May 30, 2023 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ® admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Park Maintenance Contract GOVERNING LEGISLATION: N/A PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Contract 16-174 Awarded 12/17/2016; Administrative Report on the Parks Maintenance Contract on 11/15/2022. BACKGROUND: The City of Spokane Valley offers a diverse range of parks and trails throughout its Parks System for use and enjoyment of residents and visitors. As a contract city, Spokane Valley has contracted with Senske Services for most of its Parks System Maintenance needs since 2005. Three successive contracts for Parks Maintenance Services for the City of Spokane Valley have been competitively bid through RFP processes, the first in 2004, the second in 2009, and the third in 2016, and each contract has subsequently been awarded to Senske. The current Parks Maintenance contract, which commenced in 2017, is now in its second of two three-year renewal option periods and will expire on December 31 st 2023. Staff will provide a brief review of the contract history, costs and provisions as well as challenges and calls for improved levels of service in 2022, and staff will discuss solutions that have been put in place in 2023. Additionally, staff will update Council on efforts to -date in gathering information about a possible new park maintenance contract or contracts. This will be the second in series of discussions with Council exploring options for how best to structure future Parks Maintenance RFPs that will be competitively bid in 2023 for services beginning in 2024. OPTIONS: Council Discussion RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Discussion BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: The current Senske Contract is valued at $816,255. The 2023 Parks Maintenance Budget is $972,455, which includes budgeted expenditures for unanticipated repairs, water, sewer and electricity in the Parks System, miscellaneous expenses such as portable restrooms and water system laboratory testing, and an annual contribution of $20,000 to the Centennial Trail Maintenance Fund. STAFF CONTACT: John Bottelli, Parks & Recreation Director ATTACHMENTS: PowerPoint Presentation; Park Maintenance Quantities spreadsheet 1 Park Maintenance Update May 30, 2023, City Council Contract Overview 2022 Issues & 2023 Strategies RFP for 2024: Next Steps John Bottelli I Parks & Recreation Director 2426 N Discovery Place I Spokane Valley, WA 99216 (509) 720-5400 I jbottelli©spokanevalley.org Spokane .Valley 2 Background Spokane Valley is a Contract City The City's open spaces fall into three separate maintenance categories: City Parks & Trails (Parks & Recreation Department) Irrigated Swales & Rights -of -Way (Public Works Department) Non -Irrigated Swales & Rights -of -Way (Public Works Department) City Parks are maintained under a contract with Senske Services City Rights -of -Way are maintained under separate contracts: Senske Services maintains irrigated swales and rights -of -way Geiger Crews (historically) and Other Contractors maintain non -irrigated rights -of -way Spokane jvalleye Park System —Maintained by Senske 5 Neighborhood Parks (33 Acres) 3 Community Parks (70 Acres) 1 Large Urban Park (55 Acres) 2 Special Use Facilities (2.5 Acres) 2 Natural Open Space Areas (42 Acres) 3 Currently Undeveloped Parks (88 Acres) 2 Paved Trails/Linear Parks (13 Miles) Appleway Trail — 6.4 miles (65-acre corridor) Spokane River Centennial Trail — 7 miles 3 Spokane jvalleye City Park System Maintained by Senske 23 Parking Lots 18 Picnic Shelters 17 Restroom Buildings 7 Playgrounds 4 Splash Pads 11 Sport Courts 7 Trailheads Mirabeau Waterfall West City Gateway 4 Irrigation Systems Landscaping Trees Benches Kiosks Signage Picnic Tables Garbage Cans Park Lighting Not Maintained by Senske: • Valley Mission Swimming Pool • Terrace View Swimming Pool • Park Road Swimming Pool • Sand Volleyball Courts at Browns Park • Western Dance Hall at Sullivan Park • Radio Controlled Car Track at Sullivan Park Spokane .Valley Contract History RFP Process —competitively bid Original Contract 2005-2009 Second contract 2010-2016 Current Contract (2017) One -Year, with Two 3-Year Renewals* *Current Contract Term Expires December 31st, 2023 Notable Contract Changes since 2017: (2018) Added Appleway Trail — Pines to Evergreen & Sullivan to Tschirley (2019) Added 2 new restrooms, Tschirley Trailhead, and Myrna Park (2020) Added Appleway Trail — Evergreen to Sullivan and CenterPlace West Lawn Plaza (2021) Added One Time Payment of $31K for Windstorm Damage (2023) Pending Contract Amendment for Added Services 5 Spokane .Valley Contract Values and Compensation $1,000,000 $900,000 $758,310 $800,000 $700,000 $600,000 $500,000 $400,000 $300,000 $200,000 $100,000 $- 6 $787,008 Annual Contract Amount vs Budgeted vs Actuals $798,910 $816,255 2017 2018 2019 2020 $848,239 $816,255 $816,255 2021 2022 2023* Contract Amount ■ Budgeted r Actuals *Note: Total Parks Maintenance Budget for 2023 including utilities and other miscellaneous services is $972,455 YTD: Jan - April 1 Spokane .Valley 2022 Challenges i 2023 Strategies Ongoing Staffing Challenges Increased Costs for Fuel, Labor and Materials Increased Vandalism Increased Graffiti Increased Drug Use & Littering Increased Impacts from Unsheltered Populations Increased Park Acreage Increased Noxious Weeds 7 New District Manager Quarterly Work Calendar Improved Staffing and Assignments Monthly Meetings with Parks Staff Daily Communications throughout Park Season Added non -irrigated Right -of -Way formerly maintained by Geiger crews Increased frequency of service on Appleway Trail Increased frequency of service at Browns Park Integration with City "Quick Capture" app Vegetation control at New Park Properties Spokane jvalleye Next Steps Added services in 2023 Ongoing planning for Park Security Cameras Exploring additional options for graffiti removal Preparation for 2024 Park Maintenance Contract RFP(s) Reviewed scope of services Queried other jurisdictions Researched park maintenance & operations spending trends Met with local landscaping companies Options for breaking up the contract into separate areas or services 8 Spokane jvalleye 9 Scope of Work Grounds Maintenance Mowing Trimming Pruning Edging Fertilizing Aerating Irrigation Litter Control Weed & Pest Control Pathways Parking Lots Snow Removal Park Services Reservation Postings Shelter Preparation Special Event Support Ballfield Preparation Playground Inspection Weekend Coverage Garbage Hauling Restroom Cleaning Lighting Systems Picnic Tables Park Signage Other Services Electrical Repairs Plumbing Repairs Water Testing Backflow Testing Building Painting General Carpentry Graffiti Removal Vandalism SP"T'okan jvalleye Example Quantities Total Park Acres: Irrigated Turf: Landscaping Beds: Paved Pathways: Paved Parking: Sport Courts (11): Playgrounds (7): Picnic Shelters (18): Restrooms (17): Trash Cans: Picnic Tables: Area Lights: 10 345 64 Acres 237,800 Sq Feet 862,400 Sq Feet 518,297 Sq Feet 148,647 Sq Feet 42,224 Sq feet 14,415 Sq Feet 7,153 Sq Feet 128 170 215 Spokane jvalleye 11 Current Contract Provisions Staffing Requirements Dedicated Parks Supervisor available to the Director 24 hours per day Minimum 15 staff dedicated to just Spokane Valley Parks with at least two (2) years of park maintenance experience Equipment Requirements Minimum 15 dedicated trucks plus various specialized equipment including gang mowers, dump trucks, snowplows, etc. Contractor to provide all Materials & Supplies Contractor to provide Support Facility Parks Maintenance Yard located at 7115 E Cataldo Avenue, Spokane Valley, WA 99212 Contractor to provide Year -Round Service January 1 — December 31st Daily, Weekly, Monthly, Annual Tasks including Winterization Ball Field Maintenance and Preparation Shelter Reservation Prep and Postings Special Event Support Graffiti Removal and Vandalism Repairs Spokane jvalleye Other Jurisdictions Reached out through statewide network for other examples of contracted park maintenance services Bellevue Parks — contracts grounds maintenance with private landscape contractors City of Burien — transitioned to in-house park maintenance 4 years ago City of Sammamish — contracts out partially and does a large amount in-house Mercer Island — contracts some grounds maintenance; not restrooms or other services Lake Stevens — contracts specific services when beyond staff expertise Enumclaw — contractor performs general park maintenance / city parks staff provide athletic complex and ballfield maintenance City of Spokane Valley Parks Maintenance Contract is unique 12 Spokane jvalleye Parks M&O Spending $180.00 $160.00 $140.00 $120.00 $100.00 $ 80.00 $ 60.00 $40.00 $ 20.00 $0.00 13 Park Operating Expenditures Per Capita (Including Recreation Services) $30.82 City of Spokane Valley $128.68 City of Spokane $165.77 $ Per Capita (2023) ` Median - Similar Sized Cities Median - All Agencies On Average approximately 46% of annual operating budgets is spent on Park Maintenance Source: 2023 National Recreation & Park Association City of Liberty Lake Spokane jvalleye 14 Interviews with landscaping companies Four Seasons Landscaping HAASE Landscape, Inc (Pending) Clearwater Summit Group Senske Services Key Questions: What services does your company provide? What areas of City Park Maintenance would your company be interested in? What would be required for scaling up to take on all parks in Spokane Valley? What changes would make the contract more appealing for you to consider? S"T'Pokan jvalleye 15 Highlights of Comments Received Some services are outside the scope of traditional grounds maintenance Size and scope of the current contract is large Staffing is a challenge in the industry Currently scaled for grounds maintenance of smaller sites Equipment investment requires amortization over several years Work order management systems versus dedicated contract supervisor Restrooms, Janitorial, Field Prep, Lighting and Electrical are a challenge Vandalism and graffiti are high -risk unknowns Difficult to provide a daily presence in the parks SPokan jvalleye Next Contract RFP Necessary Services Grounds Maintenance and Irrigation Systems Janitorial and Building Maintenance Electrical and Lighting Systems Park Reservations and Special Event Support Responses to Graffiti and Vandalism Snow Removal Potential Distinctions Different Services? Unique Facilities? 16 Spokane jvalleye Next Contract RFP (cont.) Considerations Cost Delivery of Service Management of Service Providers Value of Multiple Service Providers Other thoughts Daily presence in the parks a critical component of service to the public Shelter Reservations, Special Events and Ballfield Preps are unique Alternatives are needed for unknowns of vandalism and graffiti Should any services be brought in house? 17 Spokane jvalleye Next Steps / Timeline Further discussion on RFP in late June Advertise / Out for bids in July/August Award in September 18 Spokane jvalleye Park Maintenance Update May 30, 2023, City Council QUESTIONS / DISCUSSION John Bottelli Parks & Recreation Director jbottelli@spokanevalley.org (509) 720-5400 19 Spokane .Valley Spokane Valley Park Maintenance Estimated Quantities WORKING DRAFT - QUANTITIES SUBJECT TO CHANGE Park or Trail Size (Acres) Irrigated Turf (Acres) Backflow Devices (#) Unimproved (Acres) Noxious Weed Control (Acres) Trees (#) Shrubs (#) Landscaping Beds (Sq Ft) Paved Parking (Sq Ft) Gravel Parking (Sq Ft) Roadway (Sq Ft) Pathway/ Sidewalk (sq ft) Unpaved Trails (sq ft) Area Lights (#) Trash Containers (#) Drinking Fountains (#) ApplewayTrail 52.12 0.35 43.66 30,383 337,920 60 Balfour Park - (Phase 1 TBD) 8.60 5 2 Browns Park 8.20 6.00 3 34 33,500 8,000 12,000 12 10 2 Castle Park 2.70 2.66 1 22 2,200 2 Centennial Trail 11.88 369,600 CenterPlace Grounds*** 8.56 60,000 120,000 31,000 60 Discovery Place ROW 13,500 13,500 Discovery Plaground 1.50 0.13 16 10 3,600 1,400 5 11 2 Edgecliff Park 4.70 3.65 1 75 14,810 4,000 3 9 2 Flora Park Property 46.15 46.15 46.15 Flora South Parcel 0.45 0.45 0.45 Greenacres Park 10.30 6.94 4 0.60 0.60 30 1,677 12,132 11,200 5 9 2 Mirabeau Parkway ROW 36,500 40,000 Mirabeau Point Park 54.00 7 164 398 20 a. Mirabeau Meadows * 7.28 4.19 80,000 25,000 40,000 1 b. Mirabeau Springs ** 0.30 10,000 27,000 38,000 33 1 c. Natural Area 21.18 Myrna Park 11.00 Myrtle Point Conservation Area 31.10 29.65 31 5,280 Park Road Pool Grounds 2.00 0.66 2 20 39,640 3 3 Ponderosa Park Property 17.64 17.64 18 Sullivan Park **** 16.10 2.68 4 5.47 100 78,844 8,000 7 14 1 Summerfield Park Property 24.50 24.50 25 Terrace View Park 9.20 7.40 1 125 48,787 1,900 2 12 4 Valley Mission Park - North 24.00 15.78 1 2.76 150 49,571 34,786 20,000 8,000 7 27 3 Valley Mission Dog Park 1.00 0.04 2 8 865 6 3 Valley Mission South 7.20 4.82 94,613 West City Gateway 0.32 0.26 3 10 1,211 * Sewage Lift Station ** Dock/Viewing Bridge - 1,600 sq ft ***West Lawn Plaza - 13,000 sq ft 1.00 6,500 16 2 ****Well Test (weekly) TOTALS 344.66 63.69 26 157.41 90.86 747 418 237,809 518,297 36,986 81,500 862,400 38,000 213 128 25 Spokane Valley Park Maintenance Estimated Quantities WORKING DRAFT - QUANTITIES SUBJECT TO CHANGE Park or Trail Tables (#) Restrooms (#) Restrooms (Sq Ft) Shelters (#) Shelters (Sq Ft) Play grounds (#) Play grounds (Sq Ft) Splash Pads (Sq Ft) Benches / Bleachers (#) Signs / Kiosks (#) Fence (ft) Volleyball Courts (sq ft) Bball / Tennis / Sport Court (sq ft) Baseball Fields (sq ft) Skate Park (sq ft) Concrete Stage (sq ft) Pond / Waterfall (sq ft) Appleway Trail Balfour Park - (Phase 1 TBD) 3 920 7 2 5,000 Browns Park 12 5 800 2,200 5,000 1,000 12 1,800 70,000 3,500 4,000 Castle Park 3 4 1,200 Centennial Trail CenterPlace Grounds*** Discovery Place ROW Discovery Plaground 14 2 275 1,300 12,000 800 12 1,160 Edgecliff Park 20 2 436 1,000 4,000 850 4 12 1,400 15,250 13,000 Flora Park Property Flora South Parcel Greenacres Park 20 2 684 1,500 5,800 650 14 1,500 Mirabeau Parkway ROW Mirabeau Point Park 33 23 a. Mirabeau Meadows * 2 1,200 1,500 1,932 b. Mirabeau Springs ** 400 10,000 c. Natural Area Myrna Park Myrtle Point Conservation Area Park Road Pool Grounds 1 1 3 Ponderosa Park Property Sullivan Park **** 16 272 2,650 11 Summerfield Park Property Terrace View Park 24 436 1,000 7,148 3 14 1,275 13,068 Valley Mission Park - North 25 1,130 2,500 8,276 3 25 2,325 14,375 10,454 Valley Mission Dog Park 2 365 6 914 Valley Mission South West City Gateway 1 * Sewage Lift Station ** Dock/Viewing Bridge - 1,600 sq ft ***West Lawn Plaza - 13,000 sq ft 4 1,000 ****Well Test (weekly) TOTALS 170 7,153 14,415 42,224 3,300 18 139 11,574 70,000 38,125 36,522 4,000 1,932 10,000 To: From: Re: DRAFT ADVANCE AGENDA as of May 25, 2023; 11:30 a.m. Please note this is a work in progress; items are tentative Council & Staff City Clerk, by direction of City Manager Draft Schedule for Upcoming Council Meetings June 6, 2023 Study Session, 6:00 p.m. [due Tue May 30] ACTION ITEMS: 1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) 2. Second Reading Ordinance 23-012 STV 23-01, Oaks Academy Street Vacation — Levi Basinger 3. Motion Consideration: Pines & Mission Intersection Bid Award — Rob Lochmiller 4. Motion Consideration: Barker at UPRR Crossing PH 2 Bid Award — Rob Lochmiller NON -ACTION ITEMS: 5. Aging & Long Term Care of Eastern Washington — Executive Director Lynn Kimball 6. Tourism Promotion Area/Spokane Sports — Mike Basinger 7. Advance Agenda — Mayor Haley (5 minutes) (5 minutes) (10 minutes) (10 minutes) (15 minutes) (15 minutes) (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting: 65 mins] June 13, 2023, Special Meeting: 2024 Budget Workshop 8:30 a.m. to -2:30 p.m. CenterPlace Regional Event Center, Room 109 June 13, 2023, Formal Meeting, 6:00 p.m. meeting cancelled June 20, 2023 Study Session, 6:00 p.m. ACTION ITEMS: 1. Public Hearing: Six -Year TIP — Adam Jackson 2. Resolution 23-007 Adopting Six -Year TIP — Adam Jackson NON -ACTION ITEMS: 3. Advance Agenda — Mayor Haley June 27, 2023 Formal Meeting, 6:00 p.m. 1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) 2. Admin Report: Advance Agenda — Mayor Haley 3. Info Only: Department Monthly Reports July 4, 2023 Study Session, 6:00 p.m. (meeting cancelled) July 11, 2023, Formal Meeting, 6:00 p.m. 1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) 2. Admin Report: Advance Agenda — Mayor Haley July 18, 2023 Study Session, 6:00 p.m. 1. Council Goals & Priorities for LTAC — Chelsie Taylor 2. Advance Agenda — Mayor Haley July 25, 2023 Formal Meeting, 6:00 p.m. 1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) 2. Admin Report: Advance Agenda — Mayor Haley 3. Info Only: Department Monthly Reports [due Tue June 6] [due Tue June 13] (10 minutes) (5 minutes) (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting: mins] August 1, 2023 Study Session, 6:00 p.m. (meeting cancelled — National Night Out) [due Tue June 20] (5 minutes) (5 minutes) [due Wed July 51 (5 minutes) (5 minutes) August 8, 2023, Formal Meeting, 6:00 p.m. 1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) 2. Motion Consideration: Council Goals & Priorities for Use of Lodging Tax — Chelsie Taylor [due Tue July 10] (15 minutes) (5 minutes) [due Tue July 18] (5 minutes) (5 minutes) [due Tue Aug 1] (5 minutes) (10 minutes) Draft Advance Agenda 5/25/2023 9:28:31 AM Page 1 of 2 9-1-1 calls (delays, holding, etc.) ADU Appleway Trail Amenities Basement space CDBG Interlocal Agreement Governance Manual Hearing Examiner Interlocal HHAA Update LTAC Alt Appts Mirabeau Park Forestry Mgmt. August 15, 2023 Study Session, 6:00 p.m. 1. Council Goals & Priorities for LTAC — Chelsie Taylor 2. Advance Agenda — Mayor Haley August 22, 2023 Formal Meeting, 6:00 p.m. 1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) 2. Admin Report: Advance Agenda — Mayor Haley 3. Info Only: Department Monthly Reports August 29, 2023 Study Session, 6:00 p.m. 1. 2024 Budget, Estimated Revenues & Expenditures — Chelsie Taylor 2. Advance Agenda — Mayor Haley September 5, 2023 Study Session, 6:00 p.m. 1. Advance Agenda — Mayor Haley September 12, 2023, Formal Meeting, 6:00 p.m. 1. PUBLIC HEARING #1, 2024 Budget, Revenues & Property Tax — Chelsie Taylor 2. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes, Motion to set 2024 Budget Hearing for Oct 10) [due Tue Aug 8] (15 minutes) (5 minutes) [due Tue Aug 15] (5 minutes) (5 minutes) [due Tue Aug 22] (10 minutes) (5 minutes) [due Tue Aug 29] (5 minutes) [due Tue Sept 5] (10 minutes) (5 minutes) September 19, 2023 Study Session, 6:00 p.m. [due Tue Sept 12] 1. Proposed Ordinance Adoption 2024 Property Taxes — Chelsie Taylor (5 minutes) 2. Outside Agency Presentations (1: Social Service Agencies; 2: Eco. Dev Agencies—Chelsie Taylor (-100 minutes) 3. Advance Agenda — Mayor Haley (5 minutes) September 26, 2023 Formal Meeting, 6:00 p.m. 1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) 2. Admin Report: Advance Agenda — Mayor Haley 3. Info Only: Department Monthly Reports October 3, 2023 Study Session, 6:00 p.m. 1. City Manager Presentation, 2024 Preliminary Budget — John Hohman 2. Advance Agenda — Mayor Haley October 10, 2023, Formal Meeting, 6:00 p.m. 1. PUBLIC HEARING #2, 2024 Budget — Chelsie Taylor 2. First Reading Ordinance 23-_Property Tax Ordinance — Chelsie Taylor 3. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes, Motion to set 2024 Budget Hearing for Oct 10) 4. Admin Report: 2023 Budget Amendment — Chelsie Taylor October 17, 2023 Study Session, 6:00 p.m. 1. Advance Agenda — Mayor Haley *time for public or council comments not included OTHER PENDING AND/OR UPCOMING ISSUES/MEETINGS: Park Lighting Parking, Junk Vehicles, etc. Pavement Mgmt Funding PFD Presentation Prosecutor Services Protection of Utility Infrastructures SCRAPS SNAP Financial Assistance St. O&M Pavement Preservation Street Scaping, signs, trees, etc.- info [due Tue Sept 19] (5 minutes) (5 minutes) [due Tue Sept 26] (40 minutes) (5 minutes) [due Tue Oct 3] (10 minutes) (10 minutes) (5 minutes) (10 minutes) [due Tue Oct 10] (5 minutes) Transportation Benefit District Vehicle Wgt Infrastructure Impact Yellowstone Franchise Agreement Draft Advance Agenda 5/25/2023 9:28:31 AM Page 2 of 2