Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
2010, 03-02 Special Joint PC Meeting
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY AGENDA SPECIAL JOINT MEETING /STUDY SESSION Spokane Valley City Council/ Spokane Valley Planning Commission Tuesday, March 2, 2010 6:00 p.m. Spokane Valley City Hall, Council Chambers 11707 E. Sprague Avenue, Spokane Valley, WA 99206 i AGENDA ITEMS: Call to Order and Welcome: Mayor Towey Self- Introductions: Councilmembers, Planning Commissioners, City Staff 1 1. AGENDA TOPIC: Shoreline Masterplan For Information Only: (Will Not be Reported or Discussed): 2. Amended 2010 Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) 3. Federal Earmark Requests for Barker Road Adjourn J Note: Unless otherwise noted above, no public comments will be taken at this meeting. However, Council always reserves the right to request information from the public and staff as appropriate. During meetings held by the City of Spokane Valley Council, the Council reserves the right to take "action" on any item listed or subsequently added to the agenda. The term "action" means to deliberate, discuss, review, consider, evaluate, or make a collective positive or negative decision. NOTICE: Individuals planning to attend the meeting who require special assistance to accommodate physical, hearing, or other impairments, please contact the City Clerk at (509) 921 -1000 as soon as possible so that arrangements may be made. March 2, 2010 Joint Meeting, Council and Planning Commission CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: March 2, 2010 City Manager Sign -off: Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ® admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Shoreline Master Program Update — Inventory and Shoreline Characterization Report GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 90.58 and WAC 173 -26 PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Council approved consultant contract for SMP update. BACKGROUND: The City of Spokane Valley Shoreline Management Program (SMP) update process commenced in late summer, 2009. URS Corporation was contracted to assist the City with the update. The first component of the SMP update is to prepare an Inventory and Shoreline Characterization report, which is the subject of this joint City Council /Planning Commission Meeting. URS and City Staff worked collaboratively to acquire relevant baseline data used for the shoreline inventory. This data included GIS maps, reports, input from local experts and direct field observations from an ecologist and an engineer working to document the natural resources and the condition of the build environment along the shorelines. Further information was gathered during two public Open Houses in November, 2009 and February, 2010. The purpose of this joint meeting is to familiarize the Council and Planning Commission with the SMP update process and the requirements of the State's Shoreline Management Act. Major findings from the inventory work will be presented for review and discussion. Representatives from URS, the Department of Ecology and City Staff will be participating in the presentation and discussion. It should be noted that the attached Technical Review Draft has been forwarded to agencies, tribes and other technical experts for review and feedback. Comments received will be incorporated into a public review draft, which will then be the subject of a public hearing by the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission will forward a recommendation to City Council. City Council will then either "accept" the inventory report by resolution, or send it back to staff for revision. Each major component of the Shoreline Management Update will follow this process. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Provide feedback to staff. BUDGET /FINANCIAL IMPACTS: $150,000 Budgeted STAFF CONTACT: Scott Kuhta, AICP — Senior Planner ATTACHMENTS: Technical Review Draft Inventory and Analysis Report, PowerPoint presentation, SMP Inventory Fact Sheet CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM UPDATE SHORELINE INVENTORY AND CHARACTERIZATION REPORT [T`E'CHNICAL REVIEW DF City of Spokane Valley 11707 East Sprague Ave. Spokane Valley, WA 99206 February 19, 2010 AMR- City of Spokane Valley 11707 East Sprague Ave. Spokane Valley, WA 99206 February 19, 2010 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM UPDATE SHORELINE INVENTORY AND CHARACTERIZATION REPORT [TECHNICAL REVIEWDRAF21 City of Spokane Valley Community Development Department 11707 East Sprague Ave. Spokane Valley, WA 99206 Prepared by ilk 920 North Argonne Rd. Spokane, Washington 99212 in association with Jim Kolva Associates and Michael Folsom City of Spokane Valley Shoreline Master Program Update February 19, 2010 Inventory and Characterization Report REVIE PMFT TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST ACRONYMS 4aaaaa4 aauaa444aaaaaaaaaa aaa aaaaaa444aaaa.., a4a4aaa. a 44aa. a 4„4, . , aa a ,,,,4 a aaa 444 aaaaa 44 a 4 aaaa 4 a 444aaaaaaa4a ^ � 1.0 INTRODUCTION ....... .. .......... .. ................ ... 4. ......... , ............................................ ............ 1...1....1.....,...... ....... 1 1.1 PURPOSE AND GOALS OF THE INVENTORY & CHARACTERIZATION REPORT ................... ..............................1 1.2 SMA JURISDICTION WITHIN THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY ......................................... .............................. 2.0 METHODOLO GY ........................... .. ............................... ... ..................... ... a................... ..........a................... 5 2.1 INITIAL DATA COLLECTION AND GAP ANALYSIS ............................................................ .............................. 2 .2 FIELD INVENTORY .......................................................................................................... .............................. 2.2.1 Vegetation Survey Protocol ...................................................................................... ............................... 7 2 .3 ANALYSIS OF COLLECTED DATA .................................................................................... .............................. 3.6 REGIONAL CHARACTERIZATION .......................................................................... ..............................9 3.1 SPOKANE VALLEY - RATHDRUM PRAIRIE AQUIFER .......................................................... ..............................9 3 .2 SPOKANE RIVER ............................................................................................................. ............................. 3 .3 SHELLEY LAKE .............................................................................................................. ............................. 3 .4 GRAVEL PITS ................................................................................................................. ............................. 3.5 REGIONAL PROCESSES, S TRESSORS AND OPPORTUNITIES FOR IMPROVEMENT .............. .............................16 46 HISTORICAL ANALYSIS a .................................................. a. ......................................... .. ...................... ,1.196 4.1 SPOKANE RIVER ............................................................................................................. ............................. 4 .2 SHELLEY LAKE .............................................................................................................. ............................. 4.3 PARK ROAD AND SULLIVAN ROAD GRAVEL PITS .......................................................... ............................. 5.0 LOCAL CHARACTERIZATION .................................... 4............................................. ............................2 5 .1 SPOKANE RIVER ............................................................................................................. ............................. 5.1.1 Spokane River Study Segment I- Eastern City Limits to Flora Road ....................... .............................27 5.1.1.1 SR -1 Land Use Summary ................................................................................................... ............................... 28 5.1.12 SR -1 Physical and Biological Characterization .................................................................. ............................... 31 5.1.13 SR -1 Ecological Condition, Stressors, and Opportunities for Restoration or Conservation ............................... 32 5.1.2 Spokane River Study Segment 2 —Flora Road to Trent Avenue ............................... .............................34 5 .121 SR -2 Land Use Summary ................................................................................................... ............................... 35 5.122 SR -2 Physical and Biological Characterization .................................................................. ............................... 39 5.123 SR - 2 Ecological Condition, Stressors, and Opportunities for Restoration or Conservation ............................... 40 5.1.3 Spokane River Study Segment 3 Trent Avenue to Millwood Town Limits ............. ............................... 42 5.13.1 SR -3 Land Use Summary ................................................................................................... ............................... 42 5.132 SR-3 Physical and Biological Characterization .................................................................. ............................... 44 5.133 SR -3 Ecological Condition, Stressors, and Opportunities for Restoration or Conservation ............................... 46 5.1.4 Segment 4- Millwood City Limits to Spokane City Limits ......................................... .............................47 5 .1.4.1 SR- 4 Land Use Summary .................................................................................................. ............................... 48 5.1.42 SR -4 Physical, Biological, and Archeological Characterization ......................................... ............................... 49 5.1.43 SR -4 Ecological Condition, Stressors, and Opportunities for Restoration or Conservation ............................... 50 5 .2 SHELLEY LAKE .............................................................................................................. ............................. 5.2.1 Land Use Summary ................................................................................................... ............................. 521.1 Shelley Lake Physical and Biological Characterization ...................................................... ............................... 53 5212 Shelley Lake Ecological Condition, Stressors, and Opportunities for Restoration or Conservation .................. 55 5.3 PARK ROAD AND SULLIVAN ROAD GRAVEL PITS .......................................................... .............................5 5.3.1 Park Road Pit ......................................................................................................... ............................... 57 53.1.1 Park Road Pit Land Use Summary ...................................................................................... ............................... 58 53.12 Park Road Pit Physical and Biological Characterization ..................................................... ............................... 58 53.13 Park Road Pit Ecological Condition, Stressors, and Opportunities for Restoration or Conservation ................. 59 5.3.2 Sullivan Road Pit ...................................................................................................... ............................. 5321 Sullivan Road Pit Land Use Summary ................................................................................ ............................... 60 5322 Sullivan Road Pit Physical and Biological Characterization ............................................... ............................... 61 532.3 Sullivan Road Pit Ecological Condition, Stressors, and Opportunities for Restoration or Conservation........... 61 City of Spokane Valley Shoreline Master Program Update February 19, 2010 Inventory and Characterization Report *LICAL MVIEW RE &FTC 6.6 SHORELINE USE ANALYSIS ..................................................................................... .............................63 6 .1 CURRENT SHORELINE USE .................................................................:........................... .............................63 6 .2 PROJECTED SHORELINE USE .......................................................................................... .............................64 6.3 POTENTIAL CONFLICTS .................................................................................................. .............................66 6.4 MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................................. .............................66 64.1 Recommendations for the Spokane River ................................................................ ............................... 67 6 4.2 Shelley Lake .............................................................................................................. .............................69 64.3 Gravel Pits ................................................................................................................ .............................70 7 LIST OF tREEAURS .................................................................................................. .............................7I 8 &IUIOG RAFH Y` ............................................................................................................ .............................72 FIGURES Figure 1 -1: City of Spokane Valley Shoreline Master Program Areas Figure 3 -1: Spokane River and the SVRP Aquifer Figure 4 -3 Shelley Lake Drainage Basin Figure 5 -1: City of Spokane Valley Spokane River Study Segments Figure 5 -2: Spokane River Study Segment 1 Figure 5 -3: Spokane River Study Segment 2 Figure 5 -4: Spokane River Study Segment 3 Figure 5 -5: Spokane River Study Segment 4 Figure 5 -6: Overview of Shelley Lake TABLES Table 1 -1: Shoreline Master Program Jurisdiction Table 3 -1: Spokane WSO Airport, Washington (457938) Table 3 -2: Summary of Ecosystem -Wide Processed Analysis Table 5 -1: Plant Association Use Analysis Table 5 -2 Land Use SR -1 Table 5 -3: Zoning SR -1 Table 5 -4: Built Environment SR -1 Table 5 -5: Habitat Analysis SR -1 Table 5 -6: Summary of Ecological Issues SR -1 Table 5 -7: Land User SR -2 Table 5 -8: Zoning SR -2 Table 5 -9: Built Environment SR -2 Table 5 -10: Habitat Analysis SR -2 Table 5 -11: Summary of Ecological Issues SR -2 Table 5 -12: Land Use — SR -3 Table 5 -13: Zoning SR -3 Table 5 -14: Built Environment SR -3 Table 5 -15: Habitat Analysis SR -3 Table 5 -16: Summary of Ecological Issues SR -3 Table 5 -17: Land Use SR -4 Table 5 -18: Zoning SR -4 Table 5 -19: Built Environment SR -4 Table 5 -20: Summary of Ecological Issues SR -4 Table 5 -21: Land Use Shelley Lake City of Spokane Valley Shoreline Master Program Update February 19, 2010 Inventory and Characterization Report LTW- C,L REVMW WIFT Table 5 -22: Zoning Shelley Lake Table 5 -23: Built Environment Shelley Lake Table 5 -24: Shelley Lake Water Quality Data Table 5 -25: Summary of Ecological Issues Shelley Lake APPENDICES Appendix A: Data Inventory List Appendix B: Spokane River Inventory Data Tables Appendix C: Vegetation Inventory Appendix D: Wildlife and Bird Information Appendix E Map Portfolio Appendix F: Technical Review Group Comments City of Spokane Valley Shoreline Master Program Update February 19, 2010 Inventory and Characterization Report REVIEW PBA�] LIST OF ACRONYMS BNSF Burlington Northern-Santa Fe cfs cubic feet per second COSV City of Spokane Valley CT Centennial Trail DNR Washington State Department of Natural Resources DO dissolved oxygen Ecology State of Washington Department of Ecology EPA Environmental Protection Agency FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency GIS Geographical Information System HED Hydroelectric Dam HOA Homeowners' Association LWD large woody debris MSL mean sea level NRCS Natural Resources Conservation Service OHWM Ordinary High Water Mark pH Measure of acidity or alkalinity of a solution PCBs polychlorinated biphenyls PFC Proper functioning condition PHS Priority Habitat and Species QAPP Quality Assurance Project Plan RCW Revised Code of Washington RHA Riparian habitat areas RM River Mile ROW Right -of -Way SCCD Spokane County Conservation District SMA The State of Washington Shoreline Management Act SMP shoreline master programs SRHD Spokane Regional Health District SVRP Spokane Valley- Rathdrum Prairie TMDL Total Maximum Daily Load USGS United States Geological Survey USTs underground storage tanks WAC Washington Administrative Code WDFW Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife WDOH Washington Department of Health WRIA Water Resources Inventory Area WSDOT Washington State Department of Transportation WTP Wastewater Treatment Plant Li City of Spokane Valley Shoreline Master Program Update February 19, 2010 Inventory and Characterization Report [TWW1CALREVMW C 1.0 INTRODUCTION The State of Washington Shoreline Management Act (SMA), adopted in 1972, includes guidelines, goals, and policies to protect ecological function, foster reasonable use, and maintain the public right of navigation for shorelines of the State. Shorelines of the State include marine shores, shorelines of streams with a mean annual flow greater than 20 cubic feet per second (cfs), and the shorelines of water bodies greater than 20 acres. In order to implement the SMA, local jurisdictions containing Shorelines of the State are required to prepare a Shoreline Master Program. In 2003, the Washington Department of Ecology (Ecology) adopted new SMP guidelines (WAC 173 -26) that outline a "comprehensive process to prepare or amend shoreline master programs" in accordance with the SMA (RCW 90.58). The State considers shorelines as among the most valuable and fragile of the state's natural resources, and their appropriate utilization, protection, restoration, and preservation is important. Many ecological functions of river and stream corridors depend both on continuity and connectivity along the length of the shoreline, and on the conditions of the surrounding lands on either side of the river channel. Environmental degradation such as loss of vegetation or alteration of runoff quality and quantity along the corridor resulting from incremental development can impair ecological functions. Improper or ineffective shoreline planning and regulation can result in shoreline areas that are inhospitable for priority fish and wildlife species and increase susceptibly to flooding, droughts, landslides, and channel changes. These conditions can threaten human health, safety, and property. Coordination of shoreline management with other relevant local, state and federal programs. Section 8.5 of the City's July 2008 Comprehensive Plan, "Shoreline Master Program," references the use of 1975 Spokane County Shoreline Master Program as the City's interim SMP. The Comprehensive Plan states that "It is the intent of the City to prepare a shoreline master plan consistent with applicable state law (RCW 90.58) and the adopted policies in this Plan as part of the implementation of the comprehensive plan." This inventory and characterization report is part of the City of Spokane Valley's SMP update. It establishes the baseline for "no net loss" of ecological conditions, provides supporting information for development of environmental designations, and identifies degraded areas and opportunities for protection. This information provides the background for the required Cumulative Impacts Analysis, Restoration Plan and the development of shoreline regulations. 1.1 Purpose and Goals of the Inventory & Characterization Report This Shoreline Inventory and Characterization report meets the requirements of WAC 173 -26 -201 (3) (c) and (d) and generally follows the requirements of Chapter 7 — Inventory and Characterization of the draft SMP Handbook, dated August 26, 2009. The following provides a summary of the information included with this report. Goals of the Lventory a Summarize regional context a Identify and map areas influencing SMA shorelines Identify management issues of concern a Map shoreline physical, biological and cultural features • Determine river study segment boundaries Detail indicators of ecological function by reach • Summarize ecological functions and uses • Summarize shoreline characterization UM 1 City of Spokane Valley Shoreline Master Program Update February 19, 2010 Inventory and Characterization Report KCAL REVIEW Rte'] Summarize and map protection/restoration opportunities Parpose of the CharacterizatWa • Analyze functions and uses to determine localized shoreline priorities and goals • Determine potential cumulative impacts Determine recreation, development, conservation, and restoration opportunities Balance these to achieve "no net loss" of ecological function 1.2 SMA ]urisdiction within the City of Spokane Valley Shorelines of Statewide Significance and Shorelines of the State fall within the jurisdiction of the SMA. Shorelines of Statewide Significance are described in RCW 90.58.030. For rivers east of the Cascade Mountain Range crest, a Shoreline of Statewide Significance is defined as "those natural rivers or segments thereof where the mean annual flow is two hundred cubic feet per second (cfs) or more; or the portion of the rivers downstream from the first three hundred square miles of drainage area, whichever is less." The Spokane River is designated a Shoreline of Statewide Significance (WAC 173 -18 -360). The SMA directs local governments to manage shoreline uses along Shorelines of Statewide Significance (Spokane River) in the following order of preference: • Recognize and protect the statewide interest over local interest; • Preserve the natural character of the shoreline; • Result in long -term over short-term benefit; • Protect the resources and ecology of the shoreline; • Increase public access to publicly owned areas of the shorelines; • Increase recreational opportunities for the public in the shoreline; and • Provide for any other element deemed appropriate or necessary as defined by the SMA (RCW 90.58.020; WAC 173 -26 -250). Other Shorelines of the State include all streams or rivers having a mean annual flow of 20 cfs or greater and waterbodies greater than 20 acres in size. Shorelines of the State within the City of Spokane Valley include the Spokane River, Shelley Lake, and the Park Road and Sullivan Road Gravel Pits. The general state policies for Shorelines of the State are to protect ecological functions while fostering reasonable utilization and maintaining the public right of navigation. The SMA provides the following policy goals: • The utilization of shorelines for economically productive uses that are particularly dependent on shoreline location or use. • The utilization of shorelines and the waters they encompass for public access and recreation. • Protection and restoration of the ecological functions of shoreline natural resources. • Protection of the public right of navigation and corollary uses of waters of the state. • The protection and restoration of buildings and sites having historical, cultural, and educational use. • Planning for public facilities and utilities correlated with other shoreline uses. • Prevention and minimization of flood damages. • Recognize and protect private property rights. • Preferential accommodation of single family uses. • Coordination of shoreline management with other relevant local, state and federal programs. 2 City of Spokane Valley Shoreline Master Program Update February 19, 2010 Inventory and Characterization Report f"fiCC,L REV' I6W Shorelines included in this analysis include the portions of the Spokane River that are located within the boundaries of the City of Spokane Valley. This includes shorelines from the eastern City boundary (River Mile [RM] 91) to the western City boundary (RM 81.5), excluding the area within the Town of Millwood (RM 82.1 to RM 83.4), which is within Spokane County's SMA jurisdiction. City shorelines also include the shorelines of Shelley Lake and the shorelines within the Park Road and the Sullivan Road Gravel Pits owned by Central Premix. Figure 1 -1 shows the shorelines within the City at the time the inventory was completed (2009). Continuing gravel extraction operations are expected to increase the open water area at the Sullivan Road Pit. The shoreline jurisdiction for the Spokane River is based on evidence of the ordinary high water mark (OHWM) determined by field observations that were used in conjunction with high quality aerial photography to digitize an approximate OHWM. The OHWM was then offset 200 -feet landward to determine the City's shoreline jurisdiction. Existing GIS data layers for wetlands and critical areas were then evaluated to identify associated wetlands and to determine if the shoreline jurisdiction would be extended to include any critical areas (fish and wildlife habitat areas, frequently flooded areas, and geologically hazardous areas). Upstream of Flora Road, at approximate RM 89.1 and 89.6 the FEMA 100 year flood plain is located outside the 200 foot shoreline jurisdiction on portions of the north bank and upstream of Barker Road on the south bank. The three areas were reviewed and in part based on local knowledge of the river system and evidence of woody debris on the shore, it was decided that these areas were not frequently flooded and, so, were not included in the SMP jurisdiction. As the shoreline jurisdiction is relative to the OHWM boundary, this SUP development effort is based on an OHWM that is considered fairly accurate but not exact. Development proposals working near the identified shoreline jurisdiction are advised to delineate and survey the OHWM for permitting purposes. The SMP boundary would then be based on the best available survey information and, so, may change from the boundaries shown herein where surveyed OHWM data is available. The OHWM and proposed shoreline jurisdiction from the 2009 inventory for the City of Spokane Valley is included in Appendix E, Map portfolio. Table 1 -1 includes physical data from the shoreline jurisdiction. Shorelines include both the open water portion of a water body and its adjacent `shorelands'. Shorelands encompass the area 200 -feet horizontally landward from the Ordinary High Water Mark (OHWM) of a Water of the State. The OHWM is identified by examining the bed and banks of the water along the shore to determine where action of the water has created a distinct mark upon the soil with respect to upland vegetation. Shorelands are areas that contain resources such as riparian vegetation and floodplains, which are important to the protection of the waterway. The shoreline jurisdiction can extend beyond the 200 -foot limit if floodways and associated wetlands are present (RCW 90.58.030(2)(f)). A recent legal decision (Samuel's Furniture, Jaffa Holdings, and City of Ferndale vs. Ecology (Washington Court of Appeals Division I, 105 Wn. App. at 290), has indicated that readily available Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) floodways are not sufficient to define SMP jurisdiction. The shoreline jurisdiction can also extend to the landward edge of associated wetlands that are defined as wetlands that physically extend into the shoreline jurisdiction, or wetlands that are functionally related to the shoreline jurisdiction through surface water connection and/or other factors such as wildlife habitat. Critical Areas within the SMP can also be included in the SMP jurisdiction, at the City's option, so that they are managed under one set of rules. UM 3 City of Spokane Valley Shoreline Master Program Update February 19, 2010 Inventory and Characterization Report LTWWICAL Table l -1 Chnrehne Master Prrwram Jurisdiction ' Shoreline Length = linear measurement following the center of the river. 2 Based on City GIS database and field investigations. 3 The SMA boundary for the Sullivan Road Pit overlaps with the SMA boundary for the Spokane River. The land area provided for the Sullivan Road Pit does not include the overlap area. Coy Ok$Vgk W Yallq* VI 4 OMO $f relha Nast*r Program, Areas f Me: Aerial imagery source is USDA, NAP 200d - v ;r z Sullivan Road Rd :' j Spol _-ie River Figure 1.1: City of Spokane Valley Shoreline Waste P Areas ` o t : rrlFS 4 ShoreHue WettaD U Total Area Withlu Leagth° Water �lithia WKWIa SSA. 1 wi kla Sly Shaxenae Buffer miles. SMA (acres), acres � acres. 22 acres. Spokane 7.96 205 121 0 326 River Shell ey 0.92 20.9 13.2 2.3 36.4 Lake Park Road 1.7 58 36 0 94 Pit Sullivan 3 Road Pit 1.81 25 30 0 53 ' Shoreline Length = linear measurement following the center of the river. 2 Based on City GIS database and field investigations. 3 The SMA boundary for the Sullivan Road Pit overlaps with the SMA boundary for the Spokane River. The land area provided for the Sullivan Road Pit does not include the overlap area. Coy Ok$Vgk W Yallq* VI 4 OMO $f relha Nast*r Program, Areas f Me: Aerial imagery source is USDA, NAP 200d - v ;r z Sullivan Road Rd :' j Spol _-ie River Figure 1.1: City of Spokane Valley Shoreline Waste P Areas ` o t : rrlFS 4 City of Spokane Valley Shoreline Master Program Update February 19, 2010 Inventory and Characterization Report rM CMCAL REVIEW 22LFT� 2.4 METHODOLOGY URS and the City worked collaboratively to acquire relevant baseline data for the purpose of establishing an inventory of available shoreline reference material (shoreline inventory). This included geospatial/GIS data, reports, and input from local experts. In conjunction with the inventory effort, URS and City worked to determine additional data that could benefit the SNIP update process (gap analysis). This resulted in a field inventory of shoreline areas under the jurisdiction of SMA. During the field inventory, existing data was verified and augmented with direct observations from an ecologist and an engineer working to document natural resources and the condition of the built environment, respectively. To augment the shoreline inventory, URS and the City requested input from a technical advisory group (TAG) and the public. Meetings were held with TAG representatives at the beginning of the SW update project and their input was solicited during and after the shoreline inventory effort. Public input was gathered through personal interaction during the field inventory and at an open house held at City Hall on November 5, 2009 and February 4, 2010. The TAG is comprised of state and local agencies that have information related to the City Shorelines. The TAG committee includes the following agencies: • Washington Department of Fish & Wildlife, • Washington Department of Ecology, Washington Department of Natural Resources, Washington State Parks and Recreation City of Spokane Valley Parks Department Spokane County Conservation Service Spokane County Division of Utilities/Water Resources Spokane Tribe Coeur d'Alene Tribe The gathered information was analyzed through review of existing reports, aerial photography, and geospatial assessment using GIS software. The following description of the shoreline inventory and characterization methods is presented. 2,1 initial Data Collection and Gap Analysis WAC 173- 26- 201(3)(c) addresses the requirements of a shoreline inventory conducted for a new or amended SMP. The rule specifies that the local government collect the following information provided it is relevant and reasonably available: • Shoreline, adjacent land use patterns, transportation and utility facilities: • Extent of existing structures, • Impervious surfaces, • Vegetation and shoreline modifications, Water- oriented uses. • Critical areas: • Wetlands, • Aquifer recharge areas, • Fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas, Geologically hazardous areas. • Frequently flooded areas. • Degraded areas and sites with ecological restoration potential. • Areas of special interest: UM 5 City of Spokane Valley Shoreline Master Program Update February 19, 2010 Inventory and Characterization Report tTECMCAL REVIEW 9E,F'] • Priority habitats, • Developing or redeveloping harbors and waterfronts, • Previously identified toxic or hazardous material clean-up sites, • Dredged material disposal sites, o Eroding shorelines. • Conditions and regulations in shoreland and adjacent areas that affect shorelines: Surface water management, o Land use regulations. • Existing and potential shoreline public access sites: • Public access sites, • Public rights -of -way, Utility corridors. • Channel migration zones and floodplains. • Data gaps. • Land use changes relative to cumulative impacts. • Archaeological and historic resources. To support the acquisition, review, and processing of the above data, URS developed a Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP) that outlined a process for locating and reviewing relevant data sources, determining the adequacy of previously collected data, and collecting new data. URS was able to collect most of the data identified above via geospatial (GIS) sources, input from local agencies, input from local experts, and existing reports. A summary of the documentation reviewed is included in Appendix A of this report. After reviewing reports, base maps created from existing data, and speaking with local agencies and experts, URS identified several data gaps. These gaps included a precise demarcation of the OHWM, information on the vegetation communities present, areas affected by noxious weeds, areas of high wildlife use, areas suitable for restoration or preservation, and an inventory of the built environment. 2.2 Field Inventory To address the identified data gaps, verify existing information, and familiarize the team with the City's shorelines, URS and the City prepared for and conducted a field inventory. This included the following steps: a Prepare a safe work plan (URS) a Prepare a fieldwork plan (URS) • Create map books for use during field data collection (COSV) 6 Complete field reconnaissance activities to fill data gaps (URS) • Prepare working digital maps of field - collected data (URS & COSV) Inventory elements not adequately addressed in existing data resources were identified for field data collection. Two teams were assigned to data collection. The first team focused on Ordinary High Water Mark (OHWM) identifiers, unique shoreline features, wetlands, riparian vegetation, upland vegetation, and shoreline habitat. The second team focused on the built environment, including eroded banks, shore protection such as bank armoring, combined sewer outfalls, shoreline infrastructure likely to require significant redevelopment, hard engineering structures affecting fluvial stream dynamics, and other elements that may affect shoreline planning. Field data was digitized and imported into the existing project geodatabase. Digitized data met the specifications required by the City and Ecology. um 6 City of Spokane Valley Shoreline Master Program Update February 19, 2010 Inventory and Characterization Report UWWICAL REVIEW PB,�� 2,2.1 vegetation surv Protocol Existing riparian vegetation conditions are a key factor in the evaluation of proper management actions for shoreline areas. Riparian vegetation characteristics indicate what types of wildlife are likely to use the shoreline areas. These characteristics also indicate the quality of riparian corridors for the migration of wildlife through the city. Wildlife often use riparian corridors because they provide cover, food, and water. Proper documentation of the riparian vegetation was conducted to inform the SMP update but also to set a benchmark for the future evaluation of "no net loss of shoreline ecological function ". URS and Mike Folsom, PhD, a local wetland specialist and a professor of geography at Eastern Washington University, developed a vegetation monitoring protocol to quantify and classify the various types of vegetation communities, or plant associations, within the shoreline areas. The goals of the inventory were to document the dominant vegetation according to species name, percent cover, floodplain position, and native /introduced status. The Spokane River and Shelley Lake were examined on foot and from the water, but the gravel pits could not be examined in the field and are inventoried from aerial photograph examination only. The shoreline vegetation was classified into distinct stands, each with a characteristic dominant vegetation structure and species mix (plant association). Each stand was given an identifying letter, A through W and was described on a field data sheet at a representative site or "data point ". Each data point was given an identifying number. Each stand was documented with least one data point; larger stands have as many as five data points. Photographs were taken at each data point. The stands identified in this task essentially follow the plant associations described by Crawford (2003) and elaborated as plant associations in the Spokane County PFC Assessment (2005), however the Crawford study did not include the Spokane River drainage so it does not include all of the stand types encountered in this inventory. Three fluvial/floodplain positions were documented at each data point along the shoreline. This information was recorded to classify how much of the vegetation is frequently flooded, how much is water dependent/transitional, and how much upland is within the shoreline zone that is otherwise indistinguishable from adjacent upland areas. The three floodplain zones are described as follows: zone A- the frequently flooded lower elevation nearest the water, zone B- the riparian transition area, and zone C- the adjacent upland. 2.3 Analysis of Collected Data Documents and geographical information system (GIS) data were selected for review from the comprehensive list of resources that addressed specific inventory elements. A review of each significant resource was completed and relevant data was summarized in the following sections. Spatial (GIS) data was clipped by river study segment and analyzed based on relative cover within that study segment, where appropriate. For example, the amount of impervious area is characterized by study segment to highlight differences in land use patterns and potential stormwater issues along the river, Shelley Lake, and the gravel pits. This analysis generally highlighted trends specific to each study segment, which were then summarized in Section 5. Data analysis included an interpretation of findings with regard to historic conditions and disturbances as well as regional processes to determine which shoreline factors are controllable at the local level and which are the result of a historic alteration or regional process that are not under local control. For example, dams are a historic alteration beyond the control of reach - specific planning. The Rathdrum aquifer depth, flow rate, and other characteristics are also beyond the control of reach - specific planning. UM 7 City of Spokane Valley Shoreline Master Program Update February 19, 2010 Inventory and Characterization Report CAL REVIEW DBAFT C However, a wetland, noxious weed population, recreational access need, or wildlife habitat areas are relevant to reach - specific planning. The combination of existing data reviewed and summarized herein, together with additional data collected through field inventory and review of historic reference materials, adequately addressed each inventory element. 8 City of Spokane Valley Shoreline Master Program Update February 19, 2010 Inventory and Characterization Report UE5� CAL REVIEW 3.0 REGIONAL CHARACTERIZATION Identifying ecosystem -wide processes that affect the shoreline is part of the comprehensive process of amending a shoreline master program. WAC 176- 26- 201(3)(c)(i) defines the processes that must be identified and assessed to determine their relationship to ecological functions present within the SMP jurisdiction. WAC 176- 26- 201(3)(c)(i)(II) defines the scope of identification and assessment to be used. It states: "This characterization of ecosystem -wide processes and the impact upon the functions of specific habitats and human health and safety objectives may be of a generalized nature." The following elements are provided to meet the requirements of WAC 176- 26- 201(3)(c)(i). 3.1 Spokane Valley- Rathdmfn Prairie Aquifer All Shorelines of the State within the City of Spokane Valley are located within and influenced hydrologically by the Spokane Valley - Rathdrum Prairie (SVRP) Aquifer. From the source of the Spokane River at Lake Coeur d'Alene to its confluence with Latah Creek west of the City, there are no permanent tributaries providing input to the river system. There is considerable interaction, however, between the aquifer and the river. The aquifer begins in Idaho between Spirit Lake and the south end of Lake Pend Oreille. The aquifer flows south until it reaches the middle of the Rathdrum Prairie, where it turns west and flows through the Spokane Valley. Most of the flow turns north near the City of Spokane and flows through the Hillyard Trough discharging into the Little Spokane River. The EPA designated the aquifer as a "Sole Source Aquifer" in 1978 meaning that it is the sole or principal source of drinking water for an area. The aquifer was the second in the nation to receive this designation, providing the framework to develop special management practices by local jurisdictions. The highly permeable gravels of the Spokane Valley make the aquifer highly susceptible to contamination from the surface and much effort has been put into developing regulations and other mechanisms to protect the area's water supply. The Spokane River is the only watercourse over the aquifer that remains on the surface for an extended distance. This provides for interaction between the Spokane River and the SVRP aquifer. The section of the Spokane River between Lake Coeur d'Alene and Flora Road is a losing reach, discharging water to the aquifer. Between Flora Road and the Greene Street Bridge the river is a gaining reach where the aquifer discharges to the Spokane River. During the summer months, much of the water in the Spokane River downstream of Flora Road is discharged from the aquifer. It is estimated that due to the river - aquifer exchange between the Idaho - Washington border and the Sullivan Road Bridge, stream flow losses of about 100 cfs occur during low -flow conditions and about 570 cfs during high -flow conditions. Between the Trent and Greene Street Bridges, stream flow gains range from 260 cfs in November to 450 cfs in July (Gearhart 2001). These gains and losses affect stream flow, water temperature, and water quality. On an annual basis, the Spokane River accounts for 35 percent of the SVRP aquifer recharge (the Spokane Valley - Rathdrum Prairie Aquifer Atlas — Spokane County, 2000). Shelley Lake does not appear to closely interact with the SVRP Aquifer. According to conversations with Ecology staff, the bottom of Shelley Lake is above the aquifer and there is no direct interaction. However, exfiltration from the lake bottom does discharge into the aquifer. The Park Road and the Sullivan Road gravel pits have been excavated deep enough to intersect the aquifer, extending approximately 150 feet into the aquifer. Current mining operations are closely regulated in order to avoid contamination. The DNR approved reclamation plans address potential contamination by providing for limited public access and protection through use as conservation and wildlife habitat areas when mining operations cease and the pits are reclaimed. City of Spokane Valley Shoreline Master Program Update February 19, 2010 Inventory and Characterization Report � P�fiICAL� REVIEW PMET 3.2 Spokane River The Spokane River begins at Coeur IYAlene Lake, Idaho and flows west to Spokane where it turns north and then west to its confluence with the Columbia River. The majority of the river bed is comprised of large cobbles, boulders, and bedrock. The stream channel was formed during the Pleistocene catastrophic glacial outburst floods and has not been significantly altered because the permeable character of the surrounding landscape does not promote surface drainage (USGS 2002). The drainage basin or watershed east of Spokane is about 4,200 - square miles, and includes the Coeur d'Alene, St. Joe, and St. Maries Rivers. Flows vary seasonally reaching over 25,000 cfs in the spring to less than 1,000 cfs during the summer, (USGS gauge 12422500). The highest recorded daily mean flow was 49,000 cfs and the lowest was 50 cfs. Six dams are located on the Spokane River. Post Falls Dam downstream from Coeur d'Alene Lake located in Idaho, controls Spokane River flows for approximately six months during the summer and fall when flows are less than 5,000 cfs. )Figure 3 - shows the Spokane River drainage basin. tla h4etFlaal� WASHINGT V I D r li8d, -. pelt 1 O[�WAz£a.l • iw.p.Y.- f�: Po:n Coeur J a.e,o. 1 - �1e !! wus t��t: S� @a[I@EDHFefdkldit��SVRPAquifel AW* of SW VaL(vy� IW e � E 0 4 Z 4 fl & 41iea Table 3 -1 provides meteorological data from the weather station at the Spokane Airport for the 1/1/1890 to 12/31/2005 period of record. Spokane Valley is slightly wetter and warmer than at the airport, which is located on the high plateau west of Spokane. Table 3 -1 SPOKANE WSO AIRPORT, WASHINGTON (457938) Jan I Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg Max 33.0 39.1 48.2 58.2 67.0 74.3 83.9 82.7 72.4 59.2 42.9 34.7 58.0 Temp. Avg Min 21.7 25.1 30.5 36.5 43.7 50.1 55.8 54.6 46.6 37.6 29.9 24.3 38.0 Temp. Average Total 1.99 1.54 1.39 1.11 1.42 1.20 0.55 0.63 0.80 1.17 2.08 2.20 16.08 Preci in. City of Spokane Valley Shoreline Master Program Update February 19, 2010 Inventory and Characterization Report ff WNWA REVIEW PELF �'� Land use within the basin includes mining in the upper reaches of the Coeur d'Alene River watershed; forest and related forestry practices along the St Joe River; agriculture and grazing activity throughout the region; and urbanization along much of the length of the Spokane River. The Spokane River has only a few tributaries. Streams that flow north or south into the Spokane Valley generally drain into the gravels that form the SVRP Sole Source Aquifer before reaching the river. The Spokane River corridor is developed with a variety of residential, commercial, industrial and recreational land uses. The majority of the shoreline is easily accessible and dispersed use is relatively intense due to adjacent residential development and the Centennial Trail. Transportation and major utility corridors are generally located away from the river but both do cross the river at a number of locations. Large areas of the shoreline are publicly owned and managed, primarily by the Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission. According to the Spokane County Proper Functioning Condition (PFC) Assessment, prepared by the SCCD in 2005, the Spokane River is hydrologically stable. It is moderately to highly - entrenched, with little floodplain development. The shorelines of the Spokane River are characterized by small to medium - sized gravel banks with a few small sandy beaches. The Upper Spokane has moderate to well- vegetated river banks, containing a variety of native and non - native plant species. The PFC assessment generally rates the ecological condition of the Upper Spokane River as poor to fair. Geology and Sails The geology of the Upper Spokane River study area is dominated by late Pleistocene glacial outburst flood gravels that comprise the Spokane Valley. The river flows in a shallow incised inner valley within the wider valley floor. These flood gravels constitute the matrix of the SVRP Aquifer. According to the NRCS soil maps, the majority of the soils within the shoreline jurisdiction are Garrison gravelly loam and Garrison very stony loam, similar to much of the rest of the valley soils. These are gravelly, medium texture somewhat excessively drained soils with a typical topsoil depth of between 0 and 15 inches. The ability to retain water is low ranging between 0.08 to 0.16 inches per inch of soil. The NRCS rates the stony loam as difficult to establish vegetation on with a fairly easy rating for the gravelly loam. Neither soil is considered highly erosive. Vegetation Within the shoreland area (200 feet from the river's edge) there are generally three distinct, linear bands of vegetation. These include a thin band of frequently wetted, willow - dominated shrubs and herbs along the immediate edge of the river. Above this is generally a strip of riparian shrub or forest habitat along the river banks. The dominant riparian trees are black cottonwood and ponderosa pine. The most common riparian shrubs include willows, serviceberry, black hawthorn, and common chokecherry. Above the river banks, the riparian vegetation generally transitions to a band of upland vegetation that is not distinct from vegetation beyond the shoreland areas. Upland areas generally consist of Ponderosa pine and Douglas fir with grasses and shrubs. Upland areas include remnant patches of the historic Rathdrum prairie, which is now characterized by bluegrass, bluebunch wheatgrass, balsam root, buckwheat, and other native herbs. Much of the remnant prairie vegetation is heavily disturbed and the majority has been replaced by quackgrass, tall oatgrass, and/or spotted knapweed. City of Spokane Valley Shoreline Master Program Update February 19, 2010 Inventory and Characterization Report CALREVIEWMAP11 BkAogical Resources All undeveloped shoreline habitat areas along the Spokane River in Spokane Valley are important to local fish and wildlife. The Spokane River and the non - developed areas adjacent to the shoreline provide open space and habitat for wildlife. Important wildlife communities found along the Spokane River include bats, neotropical birds, aquatic mammals and waterfowl according to the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW). Wildlife observed during the Spokane County Proper Functioning Condition (PFC) study (SCCD 2005) included red - winged blackbirds, mallards, common mergansers, dipper, Canada geese, mourning doves, gold finch, magpies, red - tailed hawks, coyote, and beaver activity. Residents along the river have reported seeing bald eagles, osprey, pheasant, deer, moose, rabbits, beaver, mink, river otters, and many seasonal and year -round bird populations. Many of the wildlife populations appear to be declining according to undocumented resident sightings. The Priority Habitats & Species (PHS) database is maintained by the WDFW in order to document and manage rare or imperiled species and regionally significant habitats, such as important wildlife migration corridors. Regionally significant PHS mapping includes a variety of terrestrial and aquatic habitats and species. In Spokane County, this includes many different amphibians, songbirds, raptors, neotropical migrants, and mammals that are dependent upon shoreline or riparian/wetland habitats. Some of these species are on the current federal and/or state threatened, endangered, and sensitive species lists. The PHS species encountered along the Spokane River shorelines include: • Bald eagles (state endangered, federal species of concern) • Great blue heron (state monitor list) • Osprey (state monitor list) • Rainbow Trout • Redband Trout The Spokane River contains fisheries and spawning areas that are important for maintaining and protecting unique or locally significant populations including rainbow trout, interior redband trout, cutthroat trout, and mountain whitefish. Other species found in the river include, brown trout, suckers, and smallmouth bass. The smallmouth bass have reportedly entered the river system from Coeur d'Alene Lake and are considered to be damaging the cold -water salmonid fishery. Spawning areas for rainbow trout were identified in the 2003 Avista studies at Sullivan Road and the Centennial Trail Bridge. The gaining reach of the river below Sullivan Bridge is considered critically important for the survival of salmonids in the river system. Interior redband trout are a non - anadromous species that historically co- evolved with steelhead (both are subspecies of Oncorhynchus mykiss). Since the installation of the dams, populations of interior redband trout that were once sympatric (co- evolving) with the migrating steelhead are now experiencing allopatric (separate) evolution. This has largely cut down on the gene pool available to the species. The gene pool has also been largely affected by the addition of rainbow trout fish stocks that were artificially added to interior rivers to support recreational fishing. The introduced rainbow trout are intermixing with the redband trout resulting in a further weakening of the native gene pool. Additionally, redband trout populations have been degraded by urbanization, which has resulted in increased stream temperatures, hydraulic modifications, and lowered dissolved oxygen. For these reasons, interior redband trout have become a focal species within the Spokane River. Protection of core areas critical to native stock persistence and restoration of productive habitats will be necessary to ensure the full expression of phenotypic and genotypic diversity in interior redband trout (Thurow, et. al. 2007) The `Baseline Study to Determine the Water Quality and the Primary and Secondary Producers of the Spokane River" was published in 1984 (DOE Publication 84 -e06). This study was done to provide baseline information prior to the construction of the Liberty Lake Treatment Plant. It does not appear that any formal work was done on algae and macroinvertebrate populations since then. The study indicated UM 12 City of Spokane Valley Shoreline Master Program Update February 19, 2010 Inventory and Characterization Report W WAL REVIEW RMFT C that macroinvertebrate populations were dominated by insects of the orders of Ephemeroptera (mayfly), Trichoptera (caddisfly), and Diptera. The report noted that species diversity was low possibly as a result of high zinc concentrations in the river. Expected, but found absent in the study were stoneflies, possible due to lack of a food supply. Plant associations provide unique food and cover values for different species. The Upper Spokane River generally runs from east to west From Idaho to its confluence with Latah (Hangman) Creek. Because the south - facing river banks receive more afternoon sun, this results in different microclimates and associated plant associations on each side of the river. Deciduous riparian communities are similar along the frequently flooded portions of both banks but, above this; the north side of the river tends to contain more dry- tolerant vegetation than the southern side. The south side of the river retains moisture somewhat better and vegetation is typically somewhat denser providing better cover for wildlife and birds. Some of the most beneficial riparian plant associations for a wide variety of fish and wildlife in the region include those containing: • Quaking aspen (Populus tremuloides); • Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii); • Common chokecherry (Prunus virginiana); • Black cottonwood (Populus trichocarpa); • Common snowberry (Symphoricarpos albus); • Ponderooa pine (Pinus ponderosa); • Water birch (Betula occidentalis); • Saskatoon serviceberry (Amelanchier • Various willows (Salix spp.); alnifolia). Adjacent to the riparian corridor is the Spokane Valley- Rathdrum Prairie, which is characterized by xeric (dry- tolerant) bunchgrass grasslands with scattered shrubs. The prairie has been almost entirely converted from native to non - native vegetation, as explained in Section 4.1, below. The meeting point of the riparian and prairie vegetation communities provides unique habitat for species that use the riparian corridor for cover, nesting, or roosting and the prairie habitat for hunting/foraging. Additionally, various plants benefit from the partial shade provided along the edge of the riparian corridor, which can result in a higher diversity of plants within the upland portions of the shoreline zone relative to surrounding upland areas. Water Quality Water quality in the Spokane River is a result of natural influences such as the aquifer interchange, upstream influences such as mining and logging, and urbanization activities within the City. Water quality in the river is impaired as documented in the Federal 2008 303(d) list and the State 305(b) list. Water Quality Exceedances (303(d) and 305(b) listings) Within the study area, the Spokane River is on the State of Washington Impaired Waters list, or Federal 303(d) list for, total polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and 2,3,7,8 TCDD (dioxin). This listing is limited to the area below Kaiser Aluminum and both are associated with accumulation in fish tissue. Additional parameters included on the 305(b) list include temperature, pH, lead and zinc. The major issues affecting regional water quality include: • Metals contamination from mining activities in the upper watershed; • PCB contamination from industry; a Municipal wastewater from upstream dischargers; • Non -point source contributions including septic tank effluent and urban stormwater runoff. Metal Contamination Sediments in much of the Spokane River are contaminated with metals from mining and milling activities in the Coeur d'Alene Basin. Spokane River sediments have high concentrations of arsenic (As), cadmium (Cd), copper (Cu), lead (Pb), mercury (Hg), and zinc (Zn). Metal concentrations in the river generally increase during high spring flows (USGS 1998). Metal contamination impacts public use of the river and its shorelines. The Washington Department of Health (WDOH) and the Spokane Regional Health District (SRHD) have issued an advisory to reduce exposure to shoreline sediments along portions of the River UM 13 City of Spokane Valley Shoreline Master Program Update February 19, 2010 Inventory and Characterization Report [T MVIEW within the study area (Barker Road and Flora Road access points) due to the presence of arsenic and lead at concentrations that pose a human health risk. The Department of Ecology (Ecology) and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) are involved in developing cleanup plans. PC$ Coutamivatioa Sediments and fish tissue found within the study area contain PCBs. PCBs are a group of man-made chemicals historically used as insulating fluids or coolants and lubricants in transformers, capacitors, and other electrical equipment. They have also been used in hydraulic oils, fluorescent lights, inks, carbonless paper, and other uses. Manufacture of PCBs stopped in the U.S. in 1977 (Ecology 2005). There is currently an advisory issued by the WDOH and the SRHD to avoid or limit consumption of fish in parts of the Spokane River due to elevated PCB levels. Ecology is in the process of developing a Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) allocation for PCBs in the Spokane River. In 2006 capping of PCB sediments behind Upriver Dam, and cleanup of contaminated sediments at Donkey Island occurred. Manicipal Wastewater Municipal discharges from Liberty Lake, Hayden, Post Falls, and Couer d'Alene add nutrients and other pollutants to the river. The major impact to the river at this time is the phosphorous loading coming from both point and non -point sources. Phosphorous is the limiting nutrient in the river and promotes algae growth and low dissolved oxygen. Kaiser Aluminum and Inland Empire Paper also discharge to the Spokane River. Nan --W*st Sources Non -point sources impacting water quality include lawn maintenance and septic systems. There are efforts underway to promote decreased use of lawn fertilizers and urban runoff. The Spokane County sewering of Spokane Valley is almost complete with the Greenacres area scheduled to be sewered in 2010 and 2011. Urbanization results in increased impervious cover, resulting in increased stormwater runoff and generation of pollutants. Within the Spokane/Rathdrum Valley, stormwater runoff is typically discharged into bio- infiltration (208) swales and drywells and has little direct impact on the river or shoreline. Land Use, Transportation, and Utility Corridors Land Use, Urbanization, and PapnlaWo Grawtl� There is increasing interest in development along the shoreline and adjacent areas. Within the City, major developments recently constructed or proposed near the Spokane River include the development of residential housing upstream of the Barker Road Bridge (Riverwalk PUD); the Hanson Development and Centennial Properties land located between Flora and Sullivan Roads; Mirabeau Point;, and Coyote Rock. Other large areas along the shorelines that are undeveloped include the north bank upstream of Flora Road and almost the entire north bank downstream of Sullivan Road, including the Kaiser Aluminum property. Much of the immediate shoreline is owned by Washington State Parks with private ownership near the 200 foot shoreline boundary. Shoreline development has the potential to alter public open space, vegetation, and views, resulting in increased need for utility and transportation services and urban runoff. Transportation and Utilities Transportation and utility corridors are generally located away from the immediate shoreline. Exceptions to this include the AT &T communication line located in the Centennial Trail right of way and a short segment of Union Pacific track located on the shoreline downstream of Barker Road. Utilities and road and railroad bridges cross the river at various points within the study area. Transportation and utility corridors intersecting the shoreline area have impacts on the shoreline during construction, operation, and maintenance. As a result of traffic, roads and bridges generate noise and pollutants and require periodic maintenance; they also result in disruption of the natural environment. In an urban setting, with appropriate des ign and location, roads and bridges can provide a means to limit significant adverse um 14 City of Spokane Valley Shoreline Master Program Update February 19, 2010 Inventory and Characterization Report -- CHNICAL REVIEW DRAFT environmental impacts while providing needed transportation and utility functions. Utilities located in the shoreline include water, sanitary sewer, storm drains, natural gas, and electric and other transmission and distribution lines. Recreatio* The majority of the Spokane River is easily accessible. Dispersed use is relatively intense due to adjacent residential development and the Centennial Trail. Common recreational shoreline uses include jogging/walking and sightseeing, biking, picnicking, and swimming according to the Avista Recreation Facility Inventory and User Surveys Report, April 2004. Other common uses include angling, birding, and canoeing/kayaking. During warm weather the Spokane River from Harvard Road to Plantes Ferry is heavily used for float trips. The Barker Road Bridge is one of the most used Spokane River access point for float trips. According to discussions with local anglers, angling use of the river has decreased in recent years due to a reduction in fish populations. An exception to this is angling use below Sullivan Road is still quite high during the summer when cold water species migrate to this location. 3,3 Shelley Lake The following information has been acquired from the 2009 Saltese Flats Wetland Restoration project, the 1994 Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the development, the Shelley Lake Homeowners Association (HOA), SCCD, WDFW, Spokane County, Ecology, local residents familiar with the lake's history and a site visit performed by URS in September 2009. )Figure 3-2 shows the Shelley Lake area. iI1 ' � � ,,,N "" - 1 " ' t I : sr ' t - _ �.-- 21 a b-:. � . ' , rr 411 a ti .:, It . ' } (, ' t i r • - Vemiaw l Y -. i . „A 4 - * rl� r'+ " ,�, ° --' _ . s �.- tYl � - i t tw+ -' f . \ I v- r l f It b'lliti ,IS s f} J t I•' Ind 1, d I - s I ii ,4%.. J / , , , k, \ t A K 1 1 ft { { - i T f ' 1 ' F , ♦ ti,_ • - / .10-4 34�1�'j 1 .` s a 4 , . " I J.�J I-, r, L y 1, - .:‘1.--ns-- L 'itt'It\.,17-'" I- t . F,' lq ,,; -', , 4 .,.. .:.; v..,..--- N 4 , , ' ,.., ''...--' - • li , itti . ,...,,., .. ..,.., , i i.. • [ , . _ . .,1,-:),..,... ..., --, ---. ._ . 4 ;c,. • .., .a..it.,:i-- -,--,,,i. , ,-..-.,-- - 11:1, -. f‘ 1 , '.... k, t i . ' . i I W: - ' 11 / 4 .... - 'e - . ''''' ...f. ' ‘ ‘ '`, ... c \ ' `, ,' '1/4. ''. \ , • ' i ' 1 1 ■ fli ''',': ` 7f-' e l 'Ib �' , ? . - 1 4 ' 11, 1 l SMA BAudert Figure 3 -2: Shelley Lake Drainage Basin ,,r►t _ Sa ac d (RUC { „ `_` Zr - City of Spokane Valley L s i' -1.1 , —(:>- 1 i t �1� Liras Y V rt o t ; U10: -, �r�� I i .r Shelley Lake is a discharge point for surface water from the Saltese Flats drainage basin. The Saltese Flats drainage basin covers approximately 14,000 acres and includes Washington's Mica Peak and Saltese Flats (PBS &J, 2009). The entire drainage basin is within Washington State. Saltese Flats includes land that functions as a wetland and also land that was historically a lake /wetland system that has been drained and used for agriculture and ranching. Recent residential land development has occurred in the Saltese area. Drainage from Saltese Flats flows to Saltese Creek and then to Shelley Lake. Shelley Lake has no 15 City of Spokane Valley Shoreline Master Program Update February 19, 2010 Inventory and Characterization Report (TECHNICAL REVIEW DRAFT1 outlet and water in the lake infiltrates into the SVRP aquifer. Water flow in Saltese Creek is seasonal. In 1948, heavy rains and melting snow caused flooding in Saltese Flats and Shelley Lake. Spokane County excavated an overflow path to the Steen Road gravel pit. At that time it was reported that the gravel pit discharged the water as fast as it flowed into it (PBS &J, 2009). This diversionary drainage channel remains to route springtime flood waters into the Steen Road gravel pit. Shelley Lake water levels had, until the past few years, been maintained during the summer by pumping from an onsite well. This practice has been discontinued due to water rights issues with the well (PBS &J, 2009). Spokane County, as part of the WRIA 57 work, is evaluating restoration of wetlands within Saltese Flats. The primary intent of this work is to retain water in Saltese Flats and, by doing so, increase infiltration into the aquifer during the summer months. The evaluation includes using reclaimed water from the proposed Spokane County treatment plant to supplement the hydrological regime. Additional studies are planned, and if the county wetland restoration project is implemented Shelley Lake may have a different flow regime than it does now. 3.4 Gravel Pits Of the many gravel pit operations located within the City, two meet the definition of a surface water area of the State, per WAC 173 -20, because they contain >20 acres of open water. These include the Sullivan Road and Park Road Gravel Pits. These pits are isolated excavations that have exposed the SVRP aquifer in the process of excavating gravel deposits. The shorelines have been created by industry and are not the result of natural regional processes. Regional influences are a combination of economic drivers (gravel needs) and the Spokane Valley - Rathdrum Prairie geological and soil characteristics described above. Both gravel pits included in the shoreline jurisdiction have approved reclamation plans that require slope stabilization, planting of vegetation and a final use as a wildlife habitat and conservation area. As reported by the Audubon Society the gravel pits are heavily used by waterfowl. 3.5 Regional Processes, Stressors and Opportunities for Improvement Per WAC 173 -26- 020 -12, Ecosystem wide processes "...are the suite of naturally occurring physical and geologic processes of erosion, transport, delivery, and deposition; and specific chemical processes that shape landforms within a specific shoreline ecosystem and determine both the types of habitat and the associated ecological functions." Understanding what ecosystem wide processes are at play helps shoreline planners understand how shorelines function within the context of regional forces. The following table provides a summary of regional processes, including human- induced processes, which affect the functions provided by shorelines within the City. 19, 2010 City of Spokane Valley Shoreline Master Program Update February 19 Inventory and Characterization Report [TECHNICAL REVIEW DRAFT1 Table 3 Analysis of Ecosystem -Wide processes Prom* (Applicabk bum Caudltlo& Stressorx Recosustadatleas Magna) • Erosion (Spokane River) Sediment transport, Fair - largely High flows, lack of Bioengineering to support fluvial Impacts to diminished by HED channel migration processes that redirect river energy infrastructure controls and native zone. away from problem areas. Plant gravelly soils, vegetation on coarse, loose limited to specific sediments on banks. locations. HEDs result in sediment "starved" areas. Flooding (Spokane Flood damage, water Good- flooding Channel Restrict development in 100 -year River) quality limited by natural confinement, floodplain. Increase flood storage lake outlet and natural episodic where available to offset periodic incised channel; rain -on -snow flood damage. rarely floods outside events of existing channel Solarization (all waters) Water temperature Poor in River above Low flows, areas Plant shade - producing vegetation Sullivan Road (fish) of minimal along bare shoreline areas. Focus riparian cover, on southern exposures that receive Good (wintering eutrophication more solar input. waterfowl) Vegetation Growth (all Habitat, visual Good (trees and Non - native and Preserve high quality riparian forest waters) aesthetics, shrubs) invasive weeds, corridors, restore forest in gaps, thermoregulation, development, land Increase riparian buffer width where shoreline stabilization, Poor (herbs) conversion too thin, control spread of non- nutrients, support for native vegetation, support native local plant diversity vegetation restoration projects Water Quality Nutrient, sediment, and Poor- 303(d)- listed Mining in upper Work with regional governments to Degradation (All waters) toxicant loading for fecal coliform, watershed, CSOs, forward watershed implementation DO, temperature, point source plan. Includes control of PCBs, and zinc pollution, non- stormwater, point source pollution, point source and discouraging use of products pollution, that contain elements harmful to stormwater water quality. Fish & Wildlife In -stream habitat Fair (fish) HEDs limiting fish Work with Avista to maintain migration, foraging, and quality, riparian buffer migration and minimum flow in Spokane River, rearing (all waters) quality and widths, Good (wildlife) disrupting riparian allow woody debris in river, also conflicting shoreline corridors, lack of see recommendations for water uses. LWD in streams, quality, vegetation growth, and water quality, solarization above. Lack of connectivity development, with upland areas. recreation �� 17 City of Spokane Valley Shoreline Master Program Update February 19, 2010 Inventory and Characterization Report RECIVICAL REVIEW DRAFT) Per (Applikabb butes Clued Ulm i Sty RttematmadatIon Wakts) I ((tea Recreation (Spokane Fishing, boating, Fair -Good Limited Access, Provide parking and access to River, Shelley Lake) walking, biking, etc. HEDs, specific locations along the river incompatible with high recreation use, encourage ecological goals recreation that is sensitive to (wildlife /fish shoreline habitats (discourage habitat protection motorboats, atvs, etc.) priorities). Industrial development Tax revenue, Fair- limited to Conflicting Create a reserve of water - dependent (Spokane River) employment, specific industrial- shoreline goals and industrial -zoned land to support zoned portions of priorities (water future growth. Place in areas with the river quality, sensitive least conflict to recreation and habitats, public ecological preservation/or access, etc.) enhancement. S 18 City of Spokane Valley Shoreline Master Program Update February 19, 2010 Inventory and Characterization Report 'TECHNICAL REVIEW DRAFT] 4.0 HISTORICAL ANALYSIS To the extent practicable, the historic conditions of shoreline areas in Spokane Valley were researched to provide the following summary information. Historic conditions relate to several aspects of shoreline management, from protecting historic resources to establishing restoration targets. 4.1 Spokane River Historic Flaw Regime Prior to the construction of the Post Falls hydroelectric dam (HED) in 1906 on the Spokane River, river flows were controlled by the water levels in Coeur d'Alene Lake at the natural outlet in Coeur d'Alene. Modeling done by Northwest Hydraulic Consultants Inc. in June 2003, as part of Avista's hydroelectric dam relicensing effort, provided an estimate of the historic flow regime for the Spokane River. Modeling results indicate that the effect of the Post Falls HED on river discharge is minimal during the months of December to April. However, generally between mid June and mid September the lake is held at an artificially high elevation, reducing discharge from the Post Falls HED relative to historic flow conditions. According to the simulation, this has resulted in decreasing average monthly summer river flows, measured at the Post Falls USGS gauge by approximately 1,200 cfs. According to the model regulated flows measured at Post Falls are 2040 cfs and 680 cfs while unregulated flows are 3480 cfs and 1290 cfs for July and August, respectively. In the fall, flows increase by approximately 1,000 cfs due to drawdown of the lake for the current regulated conditions. According to the studies done during the Avista FERC relicensing, the influence of current operations at the Post Falls HED on water quality is considered minimal. The modeling shows similar influences for the regulated and unregulated flows for temperature, dissolved oxygen and pH. A slightly higher river temperature is attributed mainly to increased temperatures in the lake for the current HED operations. (HDR, 2005 Spokane River Hydroelectric Project — Current Operations Water Quality Report). The current operation of the dam does have an impact on fisheries, mostly attributed to reduction of river flows during spawning during low snowpack years and for in -river river recreation, where the minimum flow for boating is considered 1350 cfs. Historic Vegetation Current plant associations along the banks of the Spokane River are predominantly native and are likely similar to historic vegetation conditions in the shrub and tree strata, minus the increased frequency of non native woody vegetation, such as box elder (Acer negundo), sycamore (Platanus occidentalis), and black locust (Robinia pseudo - acacia). The herbaceous stratum is the area most affected by settlement. The majority of the native herbaceous vegetation has been converted to non native and /or invasive herbaceous vegetation in both grassland areas and beneath forest/shrub canopies. The SVRP was presumably bunchgrass grassland during pre - settlement times, although its native vegetation is little studied and not well understood. The historic prairie is 5 -15 miles wide and extends northeast from Spokane for approximately 50 miles. Nearly all of the historic prairie vegetation has been converted to agriculture, residential, or urban uses. One small remnant of native herb -rich SVRP grassland was found in 1990 during an endangered plant survey associated with a pipeline project (Taylor et al. 1990). This small remnant was used to estimate native vegetation of the SVRP by Lichthardt and Moseley (1997). Lichthardt and Moseley (1997) characterize the native SVRP plant association as Rough fescue (Festuca scabrella) and Idaho fescue (F. idahoensis) co- dominating a community that includes a high diversity of forbs. The SVRP is similar to the Palouse Prairie of northern Idaho. The prominence of F. scabrella is URS 19 City of Spokane Valley Shoreline Master Program Update February 19, 2010 Inventory and Characterization Report tTECHNICAL REVIEW l Atii one of the main differences between the SVRP and the Palouse Prairie. Also, shrubs appeared to be less conspicuous in the SVRP than in the Palouse Prairie. Other characteristic plants found in the SVRP association include Koelaria (Koelaria cristata), sticky geranium (Geranium viscosissimum), and graceful cinquefoil (Potentilla gracilis). Cultural Heritage and Settlement The 57- square mile Spokane Valley is a lowland plain that contains many cultural and historic sites. The aboriginal territory of the Upper Spokane and the Coeur d'Alene tribes included the Spokane River within the City of Spokane Valley. Tribal culture was deeply rooted in the river as it provided a bountiful source of food. The Spokane River once teemed with salmon and other native fish, while the riparian areas provided game, berries, and edible plants. The history of pioneer settlement in the Spokane Valley predates that of the City of Spokane. The first permanent settler in the Spokane Valley was Antoine Plante in 1849. The French Canadian trapper maintained a Hudson's Bay Company trading post near the Spokane River at what is now known as Plante's Ferry. The United States government commissioned Captain John Mullan to survey and construct a road in 1859. The Mullan Road was the most important road along the Spokane Valley shorelines providing access across the River at Plante's Ferry and then later at the community of Spokane Bridge, located near the Idaho State line. There is reference to Schneblys Bridge constructed in 1867 across the river that appears to have been located immediately downstream of the current Sullivan Road Bridge at the Daschenboeb cabin. Both are listed on the National Register of Historic Places. The Northern Pacific Railroad began laying tracks through the Spokane Valley in 1881. The first railroad bridge across the river near Trent was constructed in 1890. Remnants of the foundation remain. The International Portland Cement Company constructed the cement plant across from Plantes Ferry in 1910. According to the documentation, the cement plant covered much of the area with cement dust when in operation. The plant was shut down in the early 1970s. The agricultural history of Spokane Valley began in 1895 with the first attempts to supply irrigation from the nearby lakes. In 1899, the Spokane Valley Land and Water Company built a canal from Liberty Lake to irrigate the Greenacres area with water from Liberty Lake. The Spokane Canal company built a canal in 1905 to irrigate Otis Orchards with water from Newman Lake. Sometime between 1910 and 1925 the Spokane Valley Irrigation District constructed a canal to divert water from the river for irrigation near the state line. The Modern Irrigation and Land Company was the first to utilize the aquifer to irrigate the township of Opportunity in 1905. Within 20 years 30,000 acres of dry land had been converted to farmland. The population of the Spokane Valley increased from 1,000 in 1900 to nearly 10,000 in 1922 due to the availability of irrigated land. The Spokane Valley was chosen in 1942 as a site for an inland naval supply depot. The Naval Supply Depot opened in 1944 and is now the Spokane Industrial Park. The U.S. government also constructed an aluminum plant in Spokane Valley to support the war effort. The Trentwood Aluminum Rolling Mill opened in 1942 with 450 employees. The aluminum plant facilities included a pump station to provide river water for cooling, a wastewater treatment facility and a river discharge. In the 1920s, Inland Empire Paper Company acquired most of the land along the river corridor from the Argonne Bridge to the Idaho state line. In 1979, Spokane County Parks proposed a bicycle /pedestrian pathway along the river. This idea was nurtured by the Parks and Recreation Committee of the Spokane Valley Chamber of Commerce in 1984 as they explored recreational opportunities along the river. In 1986, g �� they proposed a 10 -1/2 mile trail to be built in conjunction with the Washington Centennial in MIS - - -- — — 20 City of Spokane Valley Shoreline Master Program Update February 19, 2010 Inventory and Characterization Report ITEMICAL REVIEW DRAM 1989. The Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission traded other Spokane County land holdings to Inland Empire Paper for their valley riverfront property. The Centennial Trail was constructed on part of these properties. A review of the historic documentation indicates that the Spokane River did not play a large role in the development of the Spokane Valley. Early land development is generally associated with irrigation from the surrounding lakes and later with pumping from the Spokane - Rathdrum Aquifer. The river was not heavily used until relatively recently. Historic Shoreline Alterations The most significant affect on the Spokane River's flow regime was the construction of six hydroelectric dams (HEDs). The HEDs have had an effect on historical fish migration. The most upstream of the six dams is the Post Falls HED (River Mile [RM] 102). This HED is located in Idaho approximately nine miles downstream of the Spokane River source at Coeur d'Alene Lake. Downstream from the City of Spokane Valley is the City of Spokane's Upriver HED located at RM 80.2. Following this are Avista's Upper Falls HED (RM 74.2), Monroe Street HED (RM 74), Nine Mile HED (RM 58), and Long Lake HED (RM 34). The City of Spokane Valley is most affected by the Post Falls HED, which regulates flow into the City, and the Upriver HED, which creates slack water at the City's west end, in the Orchard Avenue area. The shorelines have also been altered by several bridge crossings, parks development, and industrial, residential and commercial developments. Much of this development is outside of the immediate shoreline area but has altered the prairie adjacent to the shoreline. Bridges in the City include, from east to west, the Barker Road Bridge, Sullivan Road Bridge, the Union Pacific and the Burlington Northern railroad bridges, and Trent Avenue Bridge. Kaiser Aluminum has a water right for process water and discharge. One of the larger recent impacts to the shoreline is the Centennial Trail, providing a continuous recreation corridor through most of the City east of Millwood. The trail has modified the shoreline by converting an existing dirt road and adjacent vegetation to a cleared and maintained paved corridor. The Centennial Trail has increased human activities and added a minor amount of runoff and shoreline erosion in places. Downstream of Barker Road portions of the trail have been damaged by high water and have required shoreline alterations to minimize damage to the trail during high water events. Residential development has had an impact within the shoreline jurisdiction but only a fairly minor impact on the immediate shorelines, with the exception of the shoreline area west of Millwood. In this area the shoreline has been almost completely converted to residential landscaping, including docks and concrete bulkheads at the shoreline for some properties. Commercial development has mostly affected the shoreline areas near the Spokane Valley Mall with the construction of stormwater treatment basins within the shoreline jurisdiction just south of Centennial Trail. 4.2 Shelley Lake Shelley Lake is named for John Francis Shelley, who homesteaded the area in 1881. In the late 1950's the Rice family purchased a portion of the property, including the lake. The property was used for cattle grazing and a meat packing operation. According to the 1994 EIS most of the native vegetation near the lake had been destroyed by cattle grazing and the water quality in the lake was poor. When the Rice family owned the lake ice skating and miniature hydroplane races occurred. The property was sold for residential development and in the 1990's the 1st Addition of Shelley Lake Estates, a single family residential development, was constructed. The 5th Addition is currently being constructed. URS 21 City of Spokane Valley Shoreline Master Program Update February 19, 2010 Inventory and Characterization Report - -CIFINICAL REVIEW DRAFT Historic modifications made to the shorelines are difficult to determine since there is little information available on historical shoreline conditions. A 1914 photo contained in the History of the Spokane Valley by Florence Boutwell, 2003 shows a few buildings near the lake with very little shoreline vegetation. Recent modifications include residential development, the asphalt paved trail around the perimeter of the lake, and the culvert crossing for the trail at the inlet end of the lake. In addition to the shoreline modifications along the lake, a gravel access road and related fill material have been constructed along the west side of a wetland area around Saltese Creek near the confluence of the creek and the lake. The Shelley Lake HOA has been working at establishing native vegetation around the perimeter of the lake with mixed success. High lake levels are controlled by a constructed channel located upstream of the lake that directs excess flows to the Steen Road pit. 4,3 Park Road and Sullivan Road Gravel Pits The Garrison series of soils that underlay the Spokane Valley are ideal for the mining of sand and gravel. There are a number of gravel pits in the Spokane Valley, some of which have reached the end of their extraction life. The Park Road and the Sullivan Road pits have both grown in area to the point of exceeding 20 acres and are now under SMP jurisdiction. Both gravel pits are currently owned by Central Pre -Mix. Much of the information contained in this section was provided by the mine operator permit application, reclamation/closure plan, and conversations with Central Pre -Mix. The exposure of the SVRP aquifer by mining activities brought the gravel pits under the jurisdiction of the Spokane County Shoreline Program's "Shoreline Management Act of 1971." This required that a substantial development and conditional use permit be obtained. Conditions of this permit require a Hydraulic Project Approval permit and a water quality standards modification permit. It also binds the owner to preservation of archaeological sites, and enforces the reclamation plan. Initially the pits were supposed to be backfilled with clean fill. In 1989 Ecology prohibited backfilling with anything other than clean and natural material. This led to a revision of reclamation plans. The plans now call for leaving the pits as lakes and providing areas for wildlife and bird habitat. Based on information from the local chapter of the Audubon Society the vacated gravel pits provide superb habitat for a variety of water fowl. ORS 22 City of Spokane Valley Shoreline Master Program Update February 19, 2010 Inventory and Characterization Report 'TECHNICAL �"� 5.0 LOCAL CHARACTERIZATION This section provides a detailed characterization of the land use, physical, biological, and ecological shoreline characteristics within the City. The primary sources of information for the following characterization include the Spokane County Proper Functioning Condition Stream Inventory & Assessment Report (SCCD 2005), Avista HED relicensing studies, direct observation by URS, consultation with state resource agencies, and input from the Technical Advisory Group. 5.1 Spokane River Detailed analysis was conducted for four separate study segments along the Spokane River through the City. However, the following information is relative to all portions of the Spokane River: Rare Floats The Washington Natural Heritage Program, which tracks the location and status of rare plants, has no current rare plant records within the City's shoreline areas. This was confirmed by a rare plant survey that was conducted through the City's shoreline areas in 2003 for the Avista Dam Relicensing studies, which found no rare plants documented in the City ( Parametrix 2003a). 1�isb No federally - listed Threatened or Endangered fish species are present within the Spokane River. However, Rainbow and Red -band trout are both Washington State Priority Species (WDFW 2010) listed within the river system. The location of rainbow trout spawning areas (redds) varies by river reach but, in general, all portions of the Spokane River are likely to contain the following fish species: Rainbow trout, brown trout, cutthroat trout, northern pikeminnow, mountain whitefish, small -mouth bass, and largescale sucker fish (SCCD 2005, Parametrix 2003b). Priority Habitats & Species Within the City, the entire Spokane River and adjacent riparian corridor are mapped as "Urban/Natural Open Space ". Based on conversations with WDFW, this mapping category has been redesignated as "Riparian Habitat Area ". See page 12 for further information regarding the Priority Habitats & Species database. Critical Areas Within the City, the entire Spokane River corridor contains the following critical areas: • Fish and wildlife habitat conservation area (within OHWL of river) • Critical aquifer recharge area (entire river segment) • Special flood hazard area (100 -year floodplain) Soils The Garrison soil series is the dominant soil type throughout the river's shorelines within the City of Spokane Valley. The Garrison series is the most dominant soil type in the Spokane Valley. This association occurs on both sides of the Spokane River throughout the City. The topography is nearly level to gently sloping. The Garrison soils are nearly black, are gravelly and medium textured, and are somewhat excessively drained. Garrison soil phases within the City include: Garrison very stoney loam (0 to 20% slopes), and Garrison gravelly loam (0 to 5% slopes). Garrison very stoney loam is reported by the NRCS as not being a good soil to establish vegetation in. A portion of this river also contains the Riverwash soil series. This soil type is found in low -lying terraces along perennial and intermittent streams. It consists of gravel, cobbles, and stones with very little fines. Riverwash provides stream substrate and functions to limit channel migration. IIRS 23 City of Spokane Valley Shoreline Master Program Update February 19, 2010 Inventory and Characterization Report TECHNICAL REVIEW DRAFT Cultural/Historic Resources The Washington State Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation (DAHP) maintains a state- wide database of previously- recorded cultural resource sites, historic register properties, and completed inventories. The locations of the cultural resource sites (e.g., archaeological sites) are managed as restricted access information. The locations of historic register properties (e.g., buildings and structures listed on the state or national register) are non - restricted information. A records search was conducted at Olympia in July 2009, and updated via the online DAHP Washington Information System for Architectural and Archaeological Records Data (WISAARD) database, in November 2009. This restricted- access, searchable GIS database depicts locations of: previously - recorded archaeological sites, cultural resource surveys conducted after 1995, historic register properties, and cemeteries. Recorded sites are noted throughout the Spokane River Corridor within the City. The greatest density of recorded sites is located between the Sullivan Bridge and the Centennial Trail Bridge in SR -2 and SR -3. However, the entire river corridor is considered to have a high probability for the presence of historic and cultural resources. Sediment Transport In part due to the Post Falls HED, the lack of tributaries, and the gravelly soils, the river is sediment starved east of the Trent Street Bridge. Sedimentation is reliant on active bank erosion, which is minor within the City due to the gravelly soils. West of the Trent Street Bridge the flow rate is greatly reduced by the hydraulic impoundment of the Upriver Dam, located just west of the City. Sediment carried downstream by rapid flows begins to settle out near the Trent Street Bridge. The river bed near the west end of the City is covered with a layer of fines that will continue to accrete. Vegetation and Wildlife North/south- oriented wildlife migration corridors exist east and west of the City that connect the river to natural areas north and south of the City. However, within the City, migration occurs primarily west and east along the vegetated riparian corridor of the Spokane River. In conversations with WDFW, enhancement of the riparian corridor was noted as the best way to improve the ecological baseline. Improvement to the vegetated corridor would provide cover and food for wildlife. Due to the important role of riparian habitats, URS and Mike Folsom conducted a detailed inventory of the existing plant associations within the City's shoreline areas to augment the near -shore work done by SCCD in 2005. Table 5-1 identifies the relationship of the observed plant associations with the fish and wildlife that use them. This table is referenced in the following subsections of this chapter to indicate potential wildlife use within the shoreline study areas. 11/RS 24 ch . o � ° E � ° j ' � o ' 0 N N L Q a) till ^O 0 � E cd_ rn 0 b 0 0 0 3 rn a o 0 0 E a. O O 0 o 0 0 0 4 3 0 0 a • ° t0 -° t c° o - 8 0 0 cu 0 O a c E > , ,-, t0 = al ' " O N v. 3 ^" -p 4-4 co cc) 0 ,., a F Cf O N - i 1 c� 0 C r 0 9 0 0 0 , 0 0 .. id O •.0 b0 Q" O cd b 0 O t4 4-+ t0 p 4-+ ° ' c „ . a > a a c d OiC• -a � 0 • 0,03.= 00,03 • -~00 > Td 4 • O cn at U cn t0 4 c c " w c o O O y i e 5 on - O 4 .c - = ,. C t0 U.' a 4 b ° b E .� o ow a o g o o 0 o Oz7.� o a) 0 0 0.� o I I I w w C7 � a E0C.7 a w 0 En a eza E I 1 'ILA CI 44 as - .. „. 1 0 L z o o o o Q o R d ti � y Q v O 0 N O O cC O ° I. A • , .c O 3 m - o - o • Lj ' . 0 • '0 .x ' 0 .o i 1 r.6 a o i U � . 0 °O� °O� 0 0 g t o, 0� O� 0 3 E 3 L 3 3v, 3 • -' 'I A 0 ▪ 00 0 ,� o o o o m o ea o 0 o � o o 0 0 ;d o ela a , 1 o q o o 2 o o 0 ti 0 ti 0 0, 0 a) ,' a� •0 a- 0 0 , fi G r 0 A .0 v R v . p o • o o 0 p 0 •i O O O 0 O ca CS -c-' = 0 --s. ° a `� a `� a 0. a q CO -o as • � � cn , z °' ffi - • . . . . . . . . �, o wz a O k o j x a 0 a up . O C7 o� Q U can Q ¢ ¢ Q v -� a a a a a a 0 a z 0 . . . . . . . . . z ---- _-. — o � . � o o '0 vi - y . 'et: Y ,.fl o N 11 c� 0 cd .0 m g 411 '0 0 a) a 0 3 .fl .r - 0 a cd O g bA 8 �, y 8 , A ,., cd CI 0 .0 o •• O ,n ›, -0 . ,0 c „ i O c,9., aa) � o a 0 ¢, 3 �; 0 0 0 > a� 0 a a) ` �> ? o 49, m 0 ta ,.., o 0 '0 'c 0 0 0 `+ y > O y ..0 c� N O 1+ 0 0 In v, b 0 0 aD O cd t° O o 5 3: .c ,,, 0 0> y '- ,+ g 0 cv F ' .c O p a) o f 6. 0 0 3 0 um L' • vi a 3 o � - - o � �oti. o ,_ cn }. a) to ao o�3� N �r y 0. 0 4 r 0 o O it a 0 5' 5 0 b O 1 O r O O +- > N N o .fl "p 4a 0 a) 0 � ° b' c9 0 > O a� o '' a) lag o O o o r" o >u 8 -. ,00f..�o a "0 o �a a� - o�� o co ° )...-0o,-.5., � ° O i. s 0 . .0 ccs 3 > O, - N -c[7,1 t 0 a 2 w b y- 3 0 .0 iJ O O In o O i o to O ;.- 0 0 >, , n el 5 c 1/ i d • U U o b . o U o al c4-4 , -, o o ,_ o 0 ,-0 W O 0 0 0 0 0.4 ° 5w 3c7 Z c q-1 . C7 C7a ) • • • • 4 • • • • • • • • • • • o °r i . ., -48 0. oa 0 a f t ti-s1 0 tb ��... h •- K 0 U v cC F �, 1-, Q ' 2 w o 0 C cn y CD (1) +� o t• � a,oa •o' to I l ill o ao 4. y o ' � 0 , s4 3 aC o au a '� U m a o c.s m !+-I o y :' 0.1 q � n 0 ��.0 A0.' 0 U a ~. C7 o t 0 �> 7 Q fz p Vt LI 2 a City of Spokane Valley Shoreline Master Program Update February 19, 2010 Inventory and Characterization Report (TECHNICAL REVIEW DRAM Spokane River Study Segments The Spokane River was divided into four distinct study segments based on unique factors including surrounding land uses, ecological characteristics, aquifer characteristics (gaining vs. losing), hydraulics, and substrate characteristics. The unique characteristics within each study area provide the basis for assigning environmental designations that are used for planning purposes. Figure 5 -1 below provides an overview of the four river segments. River segment 1 is contains primarily residential land uses and the river recharges the aquifer in this segment resulting in low summer flows, warmer water, and relatively rapid streamflow. River segment 2 contains commercial and primarily industrial land uses. At the confluence of Segments 1 and 2 the river becomes a gaining reach as the aquifer begins to flow back into the river resulting in deeper and cooler water. River segment 3 contains rapidly developing shoreline areas and open space. Stream flow becomes slower and deeper in Segment 3. River segment 4 is completely developed residential area. The river is a slow, deep slack water in this segment due to the Upriver HED. i t •� i p i ,� 1 I i Segment 4 ;Y t Se merit 3 _ ' c : , , { .�,.� _ s Aro . N I� xkFink i " 1f ■ . 1 • t 1 ,t _ - ta4.1-1 } j i _ " � F A- e ent I ,_ u I t° �_ � t Segment 2 � - ti - -s .a 'Ru�a ' I T f � s ) ' g Z.7 - f ;tan: 1,34, - r " 1 .t 1 „- !' tii*I >' ; 1 1 - t 1 . C '' J tr r t , 1 [ � L ' a E i y `t , , L A - . _ r : — etc►avet = " 4 p T 4 . 1 t - .., ... _ ,.. _, . _'y iti 1 - „ .... , ,.._, . , . , -i r - - _.. .- _ k.... F 1 • i � 4 7- r . r _ r Legend 1: '"_ 4 t i ._ T 1- - 1j # {' • 1 rya -� ), - ~= - t1 — i a FOAM S ��; Spoliate R Ver Stu Segments StdA bounde _ OA . Y 9 ! C Spokane Valley eily Limier * ` f . t "4,1,1t e . � River Se ' ,y` n r -j � c� ��. $ U a _...-.._._ _ 5.1.1 Spokane River Study Segment 1- Eastern City Limits to Flora Road Spokane River Study Segment 1 (SR -1) includes both sides of the River between the eastern city limits and Flora Road to the west. Segment 1 is approximately 1.9 miles long and includes a total area of 88.4 acres of shoreland area within the SMP jurisdiction. This portion of the river is characterized by low to medium density residential land uses, a losing aquifer, and relatively fast, shallow river flows. The 1 stream bed is primarily composed of cobble and large gravels in long riffles with few pools. tuts 27 City of Spokane Valley Shoreline Master Program Update February 19, 2010 Inventory and Characterization Report TECHNICAL REVIEW DRAFT i • u r, , aa. - aa.aa..—_ - t 'SubStatior. 4 ! ii 4 ! i t4 • O l !1 _ = ter , a. e �, . • • . F 1 c� I1n,� • . 4 fl d o c♦ • 1 t " ttNe+r!a40..4�S »en, QW1 4 ••, n 9 • • - 4 . • 1 s � . a t,k • ,411 4 8 if Is 4 Figure 5-2 pok 42iver Study Segment, i City 05,�okang BAR* ' �4Q Shoe 1 A li . • i • ° 3 a OA FAA 51.1.1 SR -1 Land Use Summary The City Comprehensive Plan provides land use and zoning designations. The primary land use in this segment is Park/Open space. Much of the public land is owned and managed by the Washington State Parks Commission and includes open, undeveloped land primarily on the north bank and the Centennial Trail along the south bank. Most of this land was acquired by the State from Inland Empire Paper when the Centennial Trail was developed. The second largest land use is Low Density Residential. This river segment includes residential development both upstream and downstream of Barker Road. The north bank upstream of Barker Road includes manufactured home lots. The area immediately adjacent to the river is owned by State Parks. There is evidence that parts of the public shoreline have been altered by the homeowners in this development. On the south bank is the Riverwalk PUD development constructed in 1998. The River Rose Mobile Home Park is located on the north bank immediately downstream of the Barker Road Bridge. Some shoreline alteration has occurred to provide residents access to the river, however, the manager of the mobile home park has said that they have a policy to not allow improvements along river by the homeowners. Along the south side of the river is the Greenacres neighborhood. This area was originally platted into 1 and 2 -acre lots in 1904 as the Greenacres Irrigation District. Subsequent development has increased the lot density and the current zoning along the river is now R -2 allowing for 10,000 square foot lots or 4.3 houses per acre. There is the potential for additional development in the Greenacres area. MINS 28 City of Spokane Valley Shoreline Master Program Update February 19, 2010 Inventory and Characterization Report EMICAL REVIEW awl' ' ` Tables 5-2 mad 5 -3 show ike existing laud use aid zoning designations within tl~is reach. Table 5-2: Laud Use SR-1 Area t Bement Lead Us* taerosi ofT tal Railroad ROW 2.4 2.7 Heavy Industrial 2.0 2.3 Low Density Residential 32.1 36.3 Park/Open 51.9 58.7 1. Area includes river. Table 5-3: Zoaiag SR-1 11 tox Aria Fervent in (air%) 1 of Total Railroad ROW 2.4 2.7 I -2 2.0 2.3 I R -2 (10,000 sf lots) 11.9 13.5 R4 (6,000 sf lots) 20.2 22.8 Park/Open 51.9 58.7 Table 3 -4 provides a summary of the built structures and impervious surfaces. This provides an estimate of the existing development intensity within this reach. Table 5-4: Built Favi_rouwent SR-1 Area Fervent Foram (sere) of Total Rooftops 3.8 4.3 Pavement 2.3 2.6 Gravel Surfacing 3.1 3.5 Total Impervious 9.2 _ 10.4 Recreational Use and Access Recreational use areas and access locations are shown on Figure 5 of the attached map portfolio (Appendix E). The Centennial Trail is located along the south bank providing almost unlimited public access to the south shoreline. The CT provides a buffer between the Spokane River and adjacent residential land uses. The north bank is owned and managed by State Parks. Public land on the north bank is typically a fairly narrow strip between the OHWM and residential lots. Access and use of the public land on the north bank around the Barker Road Bridge is somewhat difficult since much of it is perceived as private property. Formal public access to the Centennial Trail and the shorelines include the Centennial Trail parking lot at Barker Road (south bank), the Barker Road River Access (north bank). This is one of the most popular river access points on the Spokane River. Additional access points are provided in the Riverwalk development for residents and another public access is located on City property at Montgomery Street. A locked vehicle gate and unlocked man gate are present at Montgomery Street. This access has been designated as an official river access point during the construction of the Barker Road Bridge. Two signs with this designation have been posted along the shoreline for people using the river. Access consists of a graded slope, which allows authorized vehicles access to the shoreline. Another formal access point has been provided to the Centennial Trail at Flora Road. This access point is paved from the end of Flora Road, providing handicapped access. There is no formal parking lot at this location, but vehicles do park along the road. IIIIS 29 City of Spokane Valley Shoreline Master Program Update February 19, 2010 Inventory and Characterization Report titCHNICAIL kVtEW DRAFT1 The land use is predominately residential along the south bank and many residences have developed informal paths leading to the Centennial Trail. There are four formal access points (wooden steps) along the Centennial Trail leading down the river. Downstream of the River Rose Mobile Home Park and the Union Pacific Railroad ROW, much of the property is owned by the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT). It is zoned heavy industrial and in the early 1990's portions were used to extract gravels for re- paving of I -90. This area appears to be the largest publicly owned property adjacent to the SMP boundary. Access to the north bank is generally from Flora Road. A network of old roads and informal trails exist in this area that is widely used by day hikers and anglers. Traasportatioa The Barker Road Bridge crosses the river within this river segment. The Barker Road Bridge is being reconstructed at this time (2009 -2010) and will provide vehicle, bicycle and pedestrian traffic. Parking on the bridge for boaters using the Barker Road River Access is planned. The Centennial Trail discussed previously provides recreation and pedestrian and bicycle transportation between many parts of the City. The Union Pacific Railroad is located within the shoreline jurisdiction near the Greenacres Gypsum Plant. It is planned to relocate the Union Pacific tracks during the "Bridging the Valley" project away from the river sometime in the future. A private residential collector street within the River Rose Mobile Home Park lies within the shoreline jurisdiction. Shoreline Modifications The major shoreline modifications within the SR -1 shoreline jurisdiction include residential development, the Barker Road Bridge, the Union Pacific ROW fill, and the Centennial Trail. Residential development has converted much of the upland prairie into housing and lawns. Many informal trail and access points have been created. Impervious surfaces, lawn care products, septic systems, and other activities associated with residential development provide input of pollutants into the river. Remnants of previous residents were noted during the field inventory along the south bank, typically as rock foundations and lilac bushes. A concrete pad with a corrugated metal pipe (CMP) standpipe was observed along the Centennial Trail just downstream of Barker Road. Its use is unknown. The Barker Road Bridge is being replaced and is scheduled to be completed in 2010. Bridge piers and shoreline modifications are associated with the new bridge. The Centennial Trail is a 12- foot -wide asphalt pedestrian trail that replaced an existing dirt road located along the river. The trail and associated development such as retaining walls replaced some of the native vegetation. Most retaining walls are rock gabions, except for a keystone retaining wall at the Barker Road Centennial Trail access. Smaller wooden retaining walls have been erected along the Centennial Trail, mostly for erosion control. Much of the trailside erosion appears to result from informal trails. The Centennial Trail in this river segment has flooded downstream of Barker Road Bridge and the river bank has eroded at approximately RM 89.5 causing damage to the trail. The Union Pacific railroad intersects the shoreline at RM 89.8. This area of the shoreline supports the railroad tracks and the dirt access road on what appears to be a fill area. Concrete foundations, likely associated with the railroad are located in this area between the Union Pacific Railroad tracks and the river. This area is noted as "Austin" on USGS maps. A remnant of historic industrial use on the northern/eastern shore is evident in crumbling concrete foundations near the Greenacres Gypsum plant. City of Spokane Valley Shoreline Master Program Update February 19, 2010 Inventory and Characterization Report rtECHNICAL REVIEW DRAFT] Utilities Overhead power lines cross the river immediately downstream of the Barker Road Bridge and at Flora Road. The Barker Road Bridge provides crossings for a water line, a sewer force main, and communication lines. An AT &T's fiber optics line is located under or alongside the Centennial Trail. The buried fiber optics have utility vaults located in the trail throughout this river segment. An above ground appurtenance associated with the fiber optics line was noted along the shoreline immediately upstream of the Barker Road Bridge. Two culverts for stormwater were found under the Centennial Trail. One is situated in the gulley on the north bank, just upstream of Barker Road. This culvert appears to no longer be active as a result of the development of Riverwalk. A second culvert is located downstream of Barker Road and allows for drainage to pass under an elevated portion of the Centennial Trail. Most stormwater management within this river segment is allowed to infiltrate prior to reaching the river or sheet flows through open areas. Envirouuweutal The Department of Ecology has identified heavy metal contaminated areas on both banks of the Barker Road Bridge and at Flora Road on the south bank. The Flora Road site was remediated in 2009 by capping the contaminated sediments with clean fill. This project resulted in removal of vegetation and an expansion of the beach. At Barker Road, a fence around the upstream gulley on the south bank is planned to prevent access to the contaminated sediments. On the north bank removal and capping of contaminated sediments is planned. Cultural/Archeological Resources The Washington Information System for Architectural and Archaeological Records Data (WISAARD) database identified three known sites throughout SR -1. All three sites are located along the southern shoreline, likely due to the focused surveys that were conducted there for the Centennial Trail project. None of the sites are listed on the National Register of Historic Places. 5.1.12 SR -1 Physical and Biological Characterization The substrate in this segment is characterized by large cobbles with little sediment. Water depths range from approximately eight feet in the spring when the Post Falls HED is passing most of the flow to zero feet in the late summer when this segment becomes primarily exposed gravels with surface water limited to small pools and very shallow riffles. This segment includes a large meander at River Mile 90, which results in dissipated river flow energy. The meander also results in areas of erosion at the inside meander bend (RM 89.5), which is armored by large riprap. Note that the area was further damaged due to the 2008 high spring flows. Segment 1 provides high quality visual resources to users of the Centennial Trail along the south bank due to the presence of fairly continuous mature forest between the trail and the shoreline. This is augmented by the location of surrounding residences along the south bank, which are located above the trail and generally visually separated from the trail by a shrub zone buffer. Hydraulics and Water Quality Within SR -1, the channel is moderately to highly entrenched and highly sinuous with little to no floodplain development. The dominant bed materials are cobbles and boulders with little gravel or fine sediment material. Boulders and persistent willows along the river edge provide energy dissipation and shoreline stabilization. The current is generally swift and the channel is comprised of a series of rapids with shallow pools. Because of the dam upstream, the sediment supply is low unless the streambanks are eroding. The channel is vertically and laterally stable. Large woody debris is lacking, but rocks and intermixed vegetation are adequate to dissipate energy and protect banks. This reach is a Rosgen C3 to C4 stream type. 31 City of Spokane Valley Shoreline Master Program Update February 19, 2010 Inventory and Characterization Report [TECHNICAL, REVIEW MAFIA Biological Resources and Vegetation Rainbow trout spawning surveys conducted by Parametrix in 2003 for the Avista relicensing effort documented no fish or redds within this study segment. The identification of fish and redds within a mile to either direction of this stream segment indicates that the area is used for migration but not spawning. This may be due to lack of suitable spawning habitat at the river levels found during the spring spawning season. Fish surveys noted by SCCD in the 2005 PFC study indicated that brown trout, Chinook salmon, cutthroat trout, northern pikeminnow, and largescale sucker fish are all likely to be present within River Segment 1. Wildlife noted within Segment 1 includes bats, raptors, several neotropical songbirds, aquatic mammals, waterfowl, and reptiles (SCCD 2005). Residents in the area have reported seeing bald eagle, osprey, pheasant, moose, coyotes, deer, rabbits, beaver, mink and river otter. No raptor nest sites were observed within this river segment. The Audubon Society has reported that this area provides some of the best habitat for birds along the river due to its relatively continuous vegetation and the larger fields that exist adjacent to the river. The following plant associations were observed within SR -1 (see Table 5 -1 for reference): Table 5 -5: Habitat A u abrsis SR-1 Mat �tioau, Area ' 1 rgeut (aeres) of T otal Developed/Landscaped 25.84 23% Non- native Grassland 15.61 14% PIPO/AMAL 30.58 27% PIPO/CRDO 19.82 17% POBA/AMAL 0.46 0% POBA/CRDO 6.78 6% SAEX 15.51 14% Based on Table 5 -5 above, the dominant forest cover within SR -1 is a mixture of ponderosa pine forest communities. These communities are generally unfragmented, long stands that are mature in age with multiple age classes present within a given stand. Based on Table 5 -1, these plant associations provide foraging and cover for most of the fish and wildlife present within the river corridor. A fairly continuous narrow band of ponderosa pine / serviceberry forest is present between the Centennial Trail and the shoreline on the south side of the river. This band of vegetation provides a high quality functional corridor for wildlife as well as shade for aquatic habitat. Additional cover is provided along the northern shoreline within park property to the west of the River Rose mobile home park. These stands are located within State Park ownership and, therefore, likely to be conserved. Areas south of the Centennial Trail are dominated by non - native grasslands with scattered hawthorne and serviceberry shrubs. These areas are generally in a degraded condition due to off -road vehicle use, multiple pedestrial access trails, and the ubiquitous presence of spotted knapweed and everlasting pea (Lathyrus latifolia). Along the north shore, the vegetation has been highly altered by landscaping and includes many ornamental plants. 5.1.1.3 SR -1 Ecological Condition, Stressors, and Opportunities for Restoration or Conservation The following ecological baseline will be used to measure changes over time as the City works to achieve the "no net loss of shoreline ecological functions" goal (per WAC 173 -26- 186(8)). URS - 32 City of Spokane Valley Shoreline Master Program Update February 19, 2010 Inventory and Characterization Report - PMCHNICAL REVIEW DRAM Ecological Baseline This river study segment spans three river reaches classified by SCCD in the 2005 PFC study. Reach 3 begins east of the City and terminates at RM 90.3, where the river bends to the north. SCCD Reach 4 continues downstream around the river bend to RM 89.4. From there, SCCD • Reach 5 continues into the next downstream River Study Segment (SR -2). All three SCCD reaches were rated as being in Proper Functioning Condition. SCCD Reach 3 was rated as being in "good" ecological condition, while SCCD Reach 4 was rated as "fair" and SCCD Reach 5 was rated as "fair to good ". The good ecological rating for Reach 3 appears to be due to factors located east of the City near the Harvard Road Bridge so Segment 1 is best described as being in fair ecological condition. High Quality Conservation Areas The 2005 PFC study noted high quality areas along approximately half of the southern shoreline through this study segment. The high quality determination was based upon the presence of mixed cottonwood and ponderosa pine forests over Y2 -acre in area. These high - quality areas are generally located within park land are expected to remain in conservation status in perpetuity. Degraded Areas and Opportunities for Restoration Due to the extensive areas of mature riparian forest along the southern banks of this study segment, restoration potential was rated as "low" by the 2005 PFC study. Residential development along the south banks of the river is generally located above and away from the riparian vegetation. This buffer should be maintained by setbacks to avoid future development pressure. To the east of Barker Road along the southern shoreline, the area between the Centennial Trail and residential development to the south is owned and managed by the Riverwalk Development LLC. This area is characterized by grassy slopes dominated by non - native herbaceous vegetation and sporadic native shrubs that provide good bird habitat. This area includes several uncontrolled access trails and would benefit from native herbaceous and shrub plantings as well as controlled access to discourage damage from foot traffic. Manufactured home courts flank the northern banks of the river on both sides of Barker Road. Within these areas, several homes are located within SMA jurisdiction. A thin parcel of public park land separates these homes from the edge of the river. Due to the proximity of the homes to the river, there is occasional landscaping found on the state park property. This area has little opportunity for shoreline restoration or conservation with the exception of limiting landscaping within the public shoreline areas to preserve native habitat. Between the northern apex of the river's meander bend and Flora Road to the west, there is a large undeveloped area along the northern banks of the river. This area contains a thin, discontinuous band of mature riparian vegetation on steep slopes above the river. Above this band of riparian vegetation, the habitat is degraded by a dirt road with several spur roads. The vegetation around the road is a mixture of early seral ponderosa pine saplings and non - native herbaceous upland grasses and knapweeds with a few small patches of native vegetation intermixed. This area would benefit from additional shoreline stabilization plantings on the steep slopes as well as native upland plantings in cleared areas and thinning of the existing pine saplings to provide cover, a functional migration corridor, and to prevent the spread of invasive vegetation. Recommendations Table 5 -6 is a summary of ecological issues relevant to the selection of an appropriate shoreline designation and to the goal of achieving the goal of no net loss of shoreline ecological functions. URS 33 City of Spokane Valley Shoreline Master Program Update February 19, 2010 Inventory and Characterization Report - CHNICAL REVIEW DRAFT Table 5 -6: Summary of Ecological Issues SR -1 Ecological Issas Local &trsssvars j Rccovaateadatioos Woody Cover Centennial Trail, camping, Conserve /protect existing forest areas residential development Large river meander, Incorporate bioengineering concepts into Erosion seasonally high flow rates maintenance of affected shoreline areas for visual and ecological benefits. Dominance of non - native Encourage landscaping with native plants. Invasive vegetation herbaceous cover Control spread of knapweed. Support native herbaceous restoration projects Small -mouth bass are Work with WDFW, Trout Unlimited, SCCD, Non - native fish outcompeting native trout due and Avista as habitat protection plans are to warm water tolerance. developed. Low water discharge during Work with Avista and regional governments to summer from Post Falls HED. ensure that adequate flows are maintained Water Temperature Hydraulics naturally through summer months. Create pools in discharging to aquifer. shaded areas near southern shoreline to provide trout refuge during low flows. Barker Road Clean up area/ Ensure that clean up efforts are monitored and Contamination heavy metals contamination. that replaced bed/shoreline materials are appropriate size for the local hydrologic regime and public use. Development potential along Create setbacks that would limit future southern shoreline redevelopment near existing riparian zone. Land Use Conflicts Control landscaping in public lands along the north shoreline area. Place signs prohibiting shoreline alterations on public lands. 5,1,2 Spokane River Study Segment 2 - Flora Road to Trent Avenue Spokane River Study Segment 2 (SR -2) includes both sides of the River between Flora Road (RM 89.1) to the east and Trent Street (RM 85.3) to the west. Segment 2 is approximately 3.7 miles long and includes a total area of 178 acres of shoreland within the SMP jurisdiction. This portion of the river is characterized by commercial & industrial land uses beyond an inner band of State Park land that contains a fairly continuous riparian vegetation corridor. The lack of residential presence in SR -2 results in large open tracts of continuous grassland habitat above the river banks. The aquifer discharges to the river at the east end of SR -2. This results in cooler, deeper water relative to SR -1. ,,a 34 City of Spokane Valley Shoreline Master Program Update February 19, 2010 Inventory and Characterization Report - - - " L REVIEW DRAFT r --- y t - fi" l 4 , ' !1� •fir t • • . ~ Park 1, �'= . / ,.. ' -. c_10 L oo '. / .. . '- 1 : _2 , 2_,,,,,,, 3 _ ,_, ( 1 - - ...Ry ;- I HEEz:r ; • . _, �^ � t -.'"---,Z-...--' N' F Qolcane kZt,vT Stud) Sewn; nt2 gidVA i € i , Got* vt S �1a11 , .,..<> a. sk ' i 0 "t'i 4. IOW 2090 FeK 11.21 SR-2 Land Use Summary The City Comprehensive Plan shows that the land use within this river segment is composed of: Parks /Open Space, Heavy Industrial, Low Density Residential, Mixed Use, and Regional Commercial. The largest use is for Parks /Open Space. The next largest use is heavy industrial, much of which is associated with the Kaiser Trentwood Aluminum Plant. The Regional Commercial designation is 1 associated with the Spokane Valley Mall. Mixed use areas include the area between Mission Avenue and Sullivan Road and the Mirabeau Point area. The mixed use areas are only partial developed and additional development is anticipated. Tables 5 -7 and 5 -8 show the land use and zoning within this reach. Table 5 -7: Land Use SR -2 Land Use Area 1 T Percent 1 (acres) j of Total Railroad ROW 2.4 1.4 Heavy Industrial 29.9 16.9 Low Density Residential 3.2 1.8 Mixed Use 11.3 6.4 Parks /Open Space 123 69.6 Regional Commercial 7.0 3.9 Table 5 -8: Zoning SR -2 Zoning Area Percent 1 (acres) ` of Total Railroad ROW 2.4 1.4 Heavy Industrial (I -2) _29.9 _ 16.9 um 35 City of Spokane Valley Shoreline Master Program Update February 19, 2010 Inventory and Characterization Report 'TECHNICAL REVIEW DRAM Mixed Use Center (MUC) 11.3 6.4 Parks /Open Space 123 69.6 R -2 (10,000 sf lots) 1.6 0.9 R -3 (7,500 sf lots) 1.6 0.9 Regional Commercial (RC 7.0 - 3.9 Table 5 -9 provides a summary of the built structures and impervious surfaces. This provides an estimate of the existing development intensity within this reach. Table 5-9. Wit Eaviroivaeat SR -2 tt�re� Area Peree�at ((acres) of T»ta1 Rooftops 0.3 0.2 Pavement 5.4 3.0 Gravel Surfacing 4.3 2.4 Total Impervious 10.0 5.6 Recreational Use aad Access Land use within the shoreline jurisdiction in this river segment is mostly Parks /Open Space with Heavy Industrial between Kaiser and the Trent Avenue Bridge. There are two parks within this river segment, Sullivan Road Park and Mirabeau Point Park. Both provide access to the Centennial Trail and to the river. The Centennial Trail is located on the south bank and provides almost unlimited access along the river. The shoreline jurisdiction along the north side of the river is generally State Park land. Access to this area is from Flora Road (both sides of the river), Mission Avenue (south bank), a river takeout just upstream of the Sullivan Bridge (north bank), Sullivan Park and at the Trent Road Bridge. Except for Sullivan Park, all access points are informal. There are many trail and old dirt roads that are used for hiking in this area. Sullivan Park is located on the west side of Sullivan Road on the north side of the river. The park includes a paved parking lot, picnicking facilities, and a gazebo overlooking the Spokane River. A network of trails extends downriver from the park to Kaiser's fence line. These trails are near the OHWM and provide informal access to the Spokane River. Sullivan Park is heavily used for boater access. The banks have been heavily disturbed by users entering and leaving the river in this area. Mirabeau Point Park, the former Walk in the Wild Zoo, provides access to the Centennial Trail and the river. Footpaths lead from the Centennial Trail to the granite rock outcrop. This rock formation is a popular day use recreation spot. Forest Service style fire pit was observed in the trees to the south of the outcropping. Another Forest Service style fire pit was found off of the Centennial Trail upstream of the Sullivan Road Bridge. Kaiser's intake pumping plant is located on the opposite bank and the river channel is deep at this location. An older access point that was closed in the early 1990's is located upstream of Sullivan Road at RM 88.5 on the north bank. A dirt access road leads to this area from Sullivan Road. The Spokane Canoe and Kayak Club (SCKC) is developing a proposal to reopen this access. Reopening this access would provide better access than currently exists to Sullivan Hole, which is the most widely used kayak playspot on the river. The terminus of Mission Avenue is another popular access for the Centennial Trail and the river. Currently it is heavily used by boaters to access the Sullivan Hole playspot. The Centennial Trail can also tageS - - 36 City of Spokane Valley Shoreline Master Program Update February 19, 2010 Inventory and Characterization Report ` - M a REVIEW DRA1T1 be accessed from the Spokane Valley Mall and several access points are located leading from parking lots on the north side of Indiana Street. ADA compliant access has been provided at the Sullivan Road Bridge. The section of river between the Flora Road and Mirabeau Point Park provides many locations for swimming, boating, and angling in the Spokane River. There are many locations within this section of the river that have sandy beaches. Informal footpaths are present between the Centennial Trail and the beaches. The river bank becomes steeper in the section between Mirabeau Park and the Trent Road Bridge limiting access. The Centennial Trail tends to stay along the top of the slope through this section, and there are only a few informal access points to the river. This has protected the vegetation in this area. Transportation Four bridges cross the Spokane River within this river segment. These are the Sullivan Road Bridge, the Union Pacific Railroad bridge, and the Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) Railroad bridge, located immediately upstream of the Trent Avenue Bridge. The BNSF Railroad has access roads that are within the shoreline jurisdiction. These roads provide access to both the BNSF Railroad Bridge and the Yellowstone Pipeline. A section of the Flora Pit Road is also within the shoreline jurisdiction. Shoreline Modifications Shoreline modifications in this river segment are typically associated with the four bridges, the Kaiser property, and the Centennial Trail. There are remnants of past shoreline modifications and uses along the Centennial Trail in this river segment. Old mill stones from the Inland Paper Company have been placed along the Centennial Trail where it crosses under the Union Pacific Railroad Bridge. A roof has been constructed under the bridge to protect users of the trail. There are a series of concrete piers next to the Centennial Trail between Mirabeau Point and the Sullivan Road Bridge. One pier is located directly across the river from an old brick manhole on the northern shore. Three more concrete piers are located a couple hundred feet downstream. Kaiser's modifications to the shoreline are mainly associated with the withdrawal and discharge of process water. Kaiser maintains and operates a river pumping station. This facility is equipped with three pumps and is located on the water's edge directly across from the rock outcropping at Mirabeau Point. Kaiser has also recently completed restoration of the shoreline at the location of its discharge pipe. Restoration included remediation of contaminated soils, revegetation and slope stabilization of the drainage channel where the discharge pipe is located. A rock wall was also constructed near the OHWM, parallel to the river, at the base of this draw. Shoreline modifications associated with the Centennial Trail are paving and retaining walls. The majority of these retaining walls in this segment are wood structures, erected for erosion control at the many informal river access points. The Centennial Trail is supported by a retaining wall where it goes underneath the Union Pacific Railroad Bridge. Shoreline modifications associated with the river crossings are chiefly the bridge piers and retaining walls on the river bank. There are three remaining piers from an old bridge. This bridge was situated between the present Trent Avenue Bridge and the BNSF Railroad Bridge. Two of these piers are at the water's edge and the third sits atop the bluff on the east side of the Spokane River. There is also the remains of a dirt road, which extends to the water's edge on the north east corner of the Sullivan Road Bridge Utilities There are remnants of and current utilities present throughout this segment. These utilities are situated parallel and perpendicular to the Spokane River. Buried fiber optics and utility vaults are situated along 'ORS 37 City of Spokane Valley Shoreline Master Program Update February 19, 2010 Inventory and Characterization Report TECHNICAL REVIEW DRAFT the Centennial Trail. The Yellowstone gas line crosses the river between the Trent Avenue Bridge and the BNSF Railroad Bridge. Two drinking fountains are found along the Centennial Trail. All utilities cross the river on bridges. A 24 -inch cased sewer line crosses the river under the Sullivan Road Bridge. The sewer line goes under the Centennial Trail at the south end of the bridge. The fencing around the sewer line on the north side blocks pedestrian access underneath the bridge. The BNSF Railroad Bridge has a six -inch casing attached to its south side. It is not known what utility type this is. The Trent Avenue Bridge has three four -inch casings and a six -inch casing attached under the south side, as well as an eight -inch casing under the eastbound lane. A 12 -inch casing extends a quarter of the span from west to east under the west bound lanes. Overhead power crosses the Spokane River in four places within this river segment. There are two crossings immediately upstream of the Union Pacific Railroad Bridge. Power lines cross the river between the Trent Avenue Bridge and the BNSF Railroad Bridge, and another crossing is located just downstream of the Trent Avenue Bridge. Two bioswales providing stormwater treatment for the Spokane Valley Mall are located within the shoreline jurisdiction. The eastern swale has four drywells and no dry wells were observed in the western swale. Note that the western swale is equipped with an irrigation system. An outfall structure is present along the upstream side of the Union Pacific Railroad Bridge on the north bank. This outfall consists of a suspended iron pipe, which disappears into a CMP standpipe near the OHWM. The pipe reemerges in the river channel below the water line. The structure appears to be abandoned, its use is unknown. A brick manhole was observed on the north bank downstream of the Union Pacific Railroad Bridge. This structure is approximately six feet in height and appears to have been part of the abandoned Industrial Park Treatment plant. The discharge pipe was not located. On the Kaiser Aluminum property an old drainage channel was located. An outlet structure consisting of a 30 -inch culvert and a broad crested weir was contained within the channel. The culvert extends to the water's edge. The channel and drainage structures appear to be abandoned. However, a minor amount of flow was observed discharging to the river from the culvert. A ten -inch culvert was observed on the west side of Kaiser's pump house. A drywell inlet was also noted in the concrete to the west side of the pump house near this culvert. Kaiser's treatment pond is located just outside of the shoreline jurisdiction. Several monitoring wells were observed between the effluent pond and the Spokane River. The outfall is located in a drainage channel west of the effluent pond. The outfall extends under water to mid channel. An effluent irrigation vault is located on the south side of the outfall. This vault is used to irrigate the new vegetation of the drainage channel. The only drainage structures along the Centennial Trail occur between the BNSF Railroad Bridge and the Trent Avenue Bridge. The retaining wall at the west end of the BNSF Railroad Bridge has a drainage system built behind it. This drainage system discharges to the Centennial Trail where it sheet flows across and to the river. A catch basin has been installed in the Centennial Trail where an old road intersects the trail from the BNSF Railroad right of way. The catch basin has been installed to intercept drainage from this road. A culvert extends from the catch basin and discharges onto a steep slope to the river. Environmental Portions of the Kaiser Property and the industrial areas downstream of Sullivan Bridge are noted as having contaminated soils per Ecology records. - On 38 City of Spokane Valley Shoreline Master Program Update February 19, 2010 Inventory and Characterization Report RECIVICAL REVIEW ,FTT' Cultural/Archeological Resources The WISSARD database identified more than 10 known sites throughout SR -2. None of the sites are listed on the National Register of Historic Places. 5122 SR-2 Physical and Biological Characterization The river substrate in this segment is characterized by large cobbles and boulders with little sediment accretion. The channel in SR -2 is moderately sinuous and moderately to highly entrenched with little active floodplain beyond the OHWM. An exception to this was noted along the northern shoreline, south of Kaiser Aluminum. Hydraulics and Water Quality The current in SR -2 is generally swift. The channel morphology is dominated by long rapids but SR -2 contains more and deeper pools that were observed in SR -1. Boulders line the river edge and are uniquely abundant along the northern shoreline south of Kaiser Aluminum. These boulders provide a great deal of energy dissipation and shoreline stabilization. The channel gradient is both vertically and laterally stable. Large woody debris is lacking, but the boulders along the shoreline diminish hydraulic shear stress sufficient to protect banks. Biological Resources and Vegetation Rainbow trout spawning surveys conducted by Parametrix in 2003 for the Avista relicensing effort documented radio - tagged trout and spawning areas (redds) within this study segment. Due to the aquifer discharging cool water into the stream, SR -2 provides important cold water refugia for fish downstream of Sullivan Road Bridge. Seven redds were documented around Sullivan Bridge (RM 87.2) during the 2003 surveys. Wildlife noted within SR -2 during fieldwork associated with the 2005 PFC study includes Canada geese, mourning doves, chipmunks, magpies, red - tailed hawk, red - winged blackbird as well as beaver activity, which was indicated by girdled cottonwoods. (SCCD 2005). In addition, an employee of Kaiser Aluminum found elk within the gated water intake facility more than once. Other than the fence around the water intake facility, SR -2 contains a fairly continuous narrow band of riparian forest or shrub habitat along both banks of the river, which provides a functioning wildlife corridor for species requiring cover. A unique community of mature western juniper (Juniperus occidentalis) was located on the right bank of the Spokane River at RM 86.9, intermixed with ponderosa pine and black cottonwood. This was the only community of juniper in a riparian area noted for the entire county in the PFC Study (SCCD 2005). Due to the mature tree forms, they provide important habitat for cavity - nesting birds. In addition, the Washington Natural Heritage Program maps unique /uncommon ponderosa pine plant associations along the upper periphery of the shoreline area through the Mirabeau Point Park. The following plant associations were observed within SR -2 (plant codes reference Table 5 -1): Table 5 -10: Habitat Analysis SR -10 Plant Asseciatiea Area Percent (acres) efTata] Developed/Landscaped 8.86 4% Native Bunchgrass Prairie 1.55 1% Non - native Grassland 53.26 25% PHLE /RHGL 2.38 1% PIPO /AMAL 106.06 49% PIPO /CRDO 10.14 5% PIPO /JUOC 3.48 2% 39 City of Spokane Valley Shoreline Master Program Update February 19, 2010 Inventory and Characterization Report TECITNICAL REVIEW DRAFT Plant tion Area "'meat tagreta , of Total PIPO/PHMA 6.24 3% POBA 0.51 0% PQBA/AMAL 7.03 3% POBA/PRVA 7.50 3% POBA/SAEX 0.09 0% SAEX - 10.01 5% Based on Table 5 -10, the dominant forest cover within SR -2 is a ponderosa pine /serviceberry community. This community is generally located along the southem shoreline in long, often fragmented stands, occasionally with multiple age classes present within a given stand. Stands are generally fragmented by clearings associated with camping or historic shoreline disturbance. A very narrow band of alternating black cottonwood and ponderosa pine forests are present along the northern shoreline. This corridor is thin but fairly continuous between Trent and the Kaiser Plant. East of the Kaiser plant the riparian corridor is very thin and occasionally absent. Based on Table 5 -1, forest habitat along the southern shoreline is likely to provide important foraging and cover functions for most of the fish and wildlife present within the river corridor. The cottonwood forests along the northern shoreline provide slope stabilization, insect production for birds and fish, and a thin/inadequate corridor for migratory wildlife. The large extent and continuous nature of the plant associations present within SR -2 indicate that this river segment provides a relatively important, functional migration corridor for wildlife. Additionally, the presence of snags and mature trees, including junipers, adjacent to the large prairie areas along the northern shoreline provide important hunting and foraging habitat for raptors. This use is augmented by the relatively low human presence relative to the southem shoreline. 5.1.223 SR-2 Ecological Condition, Stressors, and Opportunities for Restoration or Conservation The following characterization of baseline ecological conditions is based on the Proper Functioning Condition Study conducted by SCCD in 2005. This ecological baseline will be used to measure changes over time as the City works to achieve the No Net Loss of Ecological Functions goal (per WAC 173 -26- 186(8)). Ecological Baseline This river study segment spans portions of two relatively similar river reaches classified by SCCD in the 2005 PFC study (Figure 5 -2). SCCD Reach 5 begins just east of Flora Road and continues downstream to the Mirabeau Point Park, near the water intake facility for Kaiser Aluminum. SCCD Reach 6 continues from this point downstream into URS river study segment 3. Both reaches were rated as being in Proper Functioning Condition. Reach 5 was rated as being in "fair- good" ecological condition, which Reach 6 was rated as "poor- fair" ecological condition, a rating that does not correlate well with the determination of "high quality area" throughout this reach. High Quality Conservation Areas The entire portion of riparian vegetation with SR -2 was noted as high quality shoreline in the PFC study (SCCD 2005). The high quality determination was based upon large, intact areas of cottonwoods, ponderosa pine, willow, serviceberry, chokecherry, recreational floating, and rainbow trout spawning. Degraded Areas and Opportunities for Restoration The 2005 PFC study ranked restoration potential as "low" for most of the SR -2, despite noting that "The majority of this reach lacks adequate riparian vegetation due to development and parks, particularly on the EMS 40 City of Spokane Valley Shoreline Master Program Update February 19, 2010 Inventory and Characterization Report ITECHNICAL REVIEW DRAFT' right [north] bank" (SCCD 2005). The SCCD report specified adequate riparian vegetation as areas having a width greater than 60 feet. URS observed degraded areas along both banks that would provide opportunities for enhancement of the riparian corridor. Along the south bank several small gaps within the woody riparian vegetation corridor were observed due to human disturbance. These areas also generally correlate with a high density of non- native /invasive vegetation. The disturbance appears to be recreational in nature and is associated with off -road vehicle use, camping, and gathering locations. Large riparian corridor gaps exist along the northern shoreline as a function of steep slopes and xeric soil conditions. Above the areas influenced by groundwater, large woody vegetation has a difficult time establishing due to low water availability and depth to groundwater. Provision of an adequate riparian corridor ( >60 feet wide, per SCCD 2005), would require the installation of trees along the river edge. The establishment of riparian trees would likely require watering or custom -grown container stock to get plant roots in touch with moisture deep below the surface. Once established, the trees could create a microclimate that fosters further seral development. Beyond the forest corridor, areas along the northern ridge may be more appropriate for native prairie restoration or xeric shrub communities. Ecological Recommeudatioas Table 5 -11 provides a summary of ecological issues relevant to the selection of an appropriate shoreline designation and to the goal of achieving no net loss of shoreline ecological functions. Table 5-11 : Summary of Ecological Issues SR -2 Eco,logital bow I Loral Stream ftimo ne d tieaaa Recreational off -road traffic, Conserve /protect existing forest areas. Expand camping narrow bands of vegetation along the north bank Woody Cover and fill in gaps along the south bank. Plant tall tree species south of spawning areas and pools for shade. Concentrated flow from Incorporate bioengineering concepts into Erosion (minor) Centennial Trail resulting in maintenance of affected shoreline areas for isolated bank erosion visual and ecological benefits. Dominance of non - native Encourage landscaping with native plants. Invasive vegetation herbaceous cover, particularly Control spread of knapweed. Support native in herbaceous upland areas herbaceous restoration projects Scarcity The mature juniper community located along Rare habitat the north bank should be protected against tree removal. Smallmouth bass competition. Protect cold water refugia by restricting Non- native fish vegetation removal. Limit fishing of native trout. Avoid in -water activities near known spawning areas. Flora Road Metal Site Ensure that clean up efforts are monitored and Contamination that replaced bed/shoreline cap materials are appropriate size for the local hydrologic regime. Fence around Kaiser's water Land Use Conflicts intake facility is fenced off Provide tunnel our walkway around facility resulting in wildlife barrier 41 City of Spokane Valley Shoreline Master Program Update February 19, 2010 Inventory and Characterization Report RECIINICAL REVIEW ,FT' 5.1.3 Spokane River Study Segment 3- Trent Avenue to Millwood Town Limits Spokane River Study Segment 3 (SR -3) includes the south side of the River from Trent Avenue to the Town of Millwood. Segment 3 is approximately 1.8 miles long and includes a total area of 43.4 acres of shoreland within the SMP jurisdiction. It also includes a small segment of shoreline on the north side of the river between Trent Avenue and the city limits. This portion of the river is characterized by medium density, rapidly developing residential areas west of Myrtle Point and parks & open space east of the Myrtle Point. It has gaining hydraulics due to positive discharge from the aquifer, deeper water, and reduced flow velocity due to its proximity to Upriver Dam. The west end of SR -3 contains unique and visually interesting rocks formations in the channel. These rocks provide unique habitats for plants above the waterline as well as fish within the river. The Coyote Rock development will alter current shoreline conditions west of Myrtle Point by introducing additional foot traffic, runoff from impervious areas, docks, and associated shoreline access develo / . r " ,- -• `. 1 Ferry SO Pie tit , i ti e..... ¢tr; Er Study 3egmcnE BQUrar}4ry , ' L , Ordinarx High Water Una • 1 Li' 4r ) s i ; �t - "�� • Q I N $MV*Qarcelp ` ' _ . _ .. s Q� 45'" i s , . s .: 4 � / $ 4 j 1 \1\ -+ '1. ` Fit .� 5.i.n � . ,t _ N ' SEE � �'" ��- ""` T 0. 1. •t". a -.. � _ *1-. -•, fv,, • gip ♦ 4• "Ka 6 3.# • . o ! ..�{' -¢ �,�•� ..S ��� Q� �•i�?� 4• . r ter.: t � y ,.s^'� • � '~ `'' iikiiiiii ;s-. r _` 0 s ta'- _ � y , •t � • , *.. • 0 ti � 1 y ' y. y ' ,4•01,,V . ' r d ,ty "\'. - liSCh _ tambeau_ t fir , ; ` ; • ,, •, ".. --- - Fi ie5 ,4Spokane� . , City' of S ane 1iattey _ < B p i . 5.13.1 SR -3 Land Use Summary The City Comprehensive Plan shows that the land use within this river segment is composed of Parks /Open Space and Mixed Use. The zoning within this river segment is Parks /Open Space and Mixed Use. The land within the shoreline jurisdiction in this river segment is primarily open space, but less than the river segments upstream. The center of the Spokane River channel is the City boundary for the majority of this segment. The Coyote Rock development is private and is located in the western portion of this river segment. The Centennial Trail crosses the river at RM 84.5. Tables 5 -12 and 5 -13 show the land use and zoning within this river segment. Table 5 -12: Land Use SR -3 Laud Use Area pierced (acres) of Total Railroad ROW 0.4 1.0 IBMS 42 City of Spokane Valley Shoreline Master Program Update February 19, 2010 Inventory and Characterization Report [TECHNICAL REVIEW D1UU TI [ Mixed Use 17.6 40.5 Y Parks /Open Space 25.4 58.5 Table 5 -13: Zo*ia SR -3 eruba� 1 Arta Fart ffacrtaa I of Total Public ROW 0.4 1.0 Mixed Use 17.6 40.5 Parks /Open Space 25.4 58.5 Table 5 -14 provides a summary of the built structures, impervious surfaces, and development intensity within the shoreline jurisdiction for this river segment. Table 5 -14 : Built Eaviro*u eat l�'eatur Arta ?want (a) of Total Rooftops 0.0 0 Pavement 0.7 1.6 Gravel Surfacing 6.8 15.7 Total Impervious 7.5 17.3 Recreational Use and Access The Centennial Trail is accessed from Plante's Ferry, located on the north bank of the river outside of the City, and at an informal gravel lot located at the northwest corner of the Trent Avenue Bridge. It appears that limited parking may be available at the Coyote Rock development. The City's Myrtle Point Conservation Area is located upstream of the Centennial Trail Bridge. According to the Audubon Society this area provides excellent habitat for many important bird populations. The backwater of the Upriver HED is present in this segment. The shoreline is relatively flat and sandy. The basalt outcroppings and small coves provide for a popular recreation area used for swimming and angling. An access point for boaters has been discussed with various groups during the inventory. The desire for a boat take -out has been suggested at either Coyote Rock, Myrtle Point, or Plante's Ferry. Transportation An abandoned portion of the Inland Empire Paper Company (IEPC) Railroad tracks are within the shoreline jurisdiction downstream of the Trent Avenue Bridge. Portions of Coyote Rock Road are also within the shoreline jurisdiction. The Centennial Trail bridge is located at the eastern edge of the Coyote Rock Development. Shoreline Modifications The Centennial Trail and the Centennial Trail Bridge have modified the shoreline in this area. The preliminary development of Coyote Rock has resulted in the removal of vegetation, construction of roads, building lots, and utilities. No homes were constructed at the time of the inventory but it is anticipated that this development will be built out in the near future. Approximately 31 lots have direct access to the river. Development covenants provide for protection of the existing 75 foot shoreline buffer. Individual lot river access and docks are allowed in the development. Individual permits will be needed for development of any river access. • REM 43 City of Spokane Valley Shoreline Master Program Update February 19, 2010 Inventory and Characterization Report ITEMNICAL REVIEW DRAM The southern shore line across from Plante's Ferry Park is a flat bluff just above the OHWM. Several piers of river rock cemented together were observed in this area. The orientation of these structures is random and it is uncertain what they were used for. A few hundred feet downriver lay three concrete 1 piers in a line parallel with the river. The two outer piers are equipped with steel hoops oriented towards the center pier. A large concrete pad is located west of these three piers. This pad is equipped with a large steel hoop directly inline with the center pier. An old concrete structure was observed on the shoreline immediately downstream of the basalt outcroppings. This structure has three concrete walls parallel to the river on top of a concrete pad. Its use is unknown. On the bluff above this area was located the International Portland Cement Plant. Documentation indicates that this entire area was covered with cement dust when the plant was operating. It was closed in the early 1970s. Utilities Overhead power crosses the river at three locations in this river segment. A 12 -inch culvert from the cement factory discharges to a 12 -inch culvert under the Centennial Trail and then down an eroded gulley to the Spokane River. The Coyote Rock development has full utilities including sewer. A lift station has been constructed just outside of the shoreline jurisdiction. One foundation and daylight basement had been constructed at the time of the inventory. Environmental The Myrtle Point and Islands Lagoon metals clean up sites are both located within SR -3 (Ecology 2009). Remediation of these two sites was slated for 2009 by Ecology. Cultural/Archeological Resources The WISAARD database identified several known sites throughout SR -3, including several around the railroad and the historic Plante's Ferry. None of the sites are listed on the National Register of Historic Places. 5.132 SR -3 Physical and Biological Characterization The river channel contains a series of rapids with shallow pools. The stream bed is primarily composed of cobble and large gravels with fines beginning to drop out of the water column at the west end of SR -3 due to the decreasing flow rate associated with the Upriver Dam located west of town. Myrtle Point creates a large meander in the stream that dissipates flow energy and results in eddies and some associated erosion at the tail end of the river bend. Bedrock outcrops and large boulders characterize SR- 3. The streambanks along the south side of the river (excluding the outcrops) are composed of unconsolidated, incohesive materials that are easily eroded but large boulders along the river edge provide sufficient energy deflection/dissipation to avoid significant bank erosion. Hydraulics and Water Quality The current is generally swift around Myrtle Point but slows at the west end of SR -3 as flow energy is dissipated by the in -stream rock outcrops and the backwater of Upriver Dam. The 2005 PFC study indicates that the channel is vertically and laterally stable. Large woody debris is lacking, but the rock outcrops within the channel provide complex stream hydraulics and associated habitats. Biological Resources and Vegetation VMS 44 City of Spokane Valley Shoreline Master Program Update February 19, 2010 Inventory and Characterization Report [TECHNICAL REVIEW AFT! Rainbow trout spawning surveys conducted by Parametrix in 2003 for the Avista relicensing effort documented radio - tagged trout and spawning areas (redds) within this study segment. Thirteen redds were documented around the Centennial Trail Bridge (RM 84.2) during the 2003 surveys. Wildlife noted within SR -3 during fieldwork associated with the 2005 PFC study includes mourning doves, chipmunks, magpies, red - tailed hawk, red - winged blackbird, and beaver, which was indicated by girdled cottonwoods (SCCD 2005). The rock outcrops between the Centennial Trail Bridge and Myrtle Point provide unique habitat for neotropical songbirds resulting in high concentrations there. The PHS database identifies cliff habitat northwest of Myrtle Point, outside of the City on the north side of the river. Cliff- dwelling bats and birds are likely to use the river and riparian habitats in SR -3 for hunting and foraging. Few migration barriers exist throughout SR -3. The following plant associations were observed within SR -3 (plant codes reference Table 5 -1): Table S -IS: Habitat AAsatysis that Ass�o iatioa Area f"�r t (aerra) otUral CRDO - AMAL -PHMA 1.68 3% Developed/Landscaped 10.07 20% Native Bunchgrass Prairie 1.38 3% Non - native Grassland 7.19 14% PIPO/CRDO 16.00 32% POBA 0.24 0% POBA/CRDO 5.92 12% POBA/SAEX 4.36 9% PSME/PREM 1.92 4% SAEX 1.25 3% The dominant plant association within SR -3 is Ponderosa pine/black hawthorne. This community is generally located along the southern shoreline in long, often fragmented stands above the river banks. Near the Trent Street bridge, there is a mature stand of PIPO /CRDO. Northwest of this stand the corridor transitions into degraded non - native herbaceous vegetation with young pine saplings establishing. A remnant patch of native herbaceous prairie vegetation was noted within this degraded habitat. This patch is noted as "Native Bunchgrass Prairie" in the table above. High quality shrub habitat (CRDO -AMAL- PHMA) was noted continuously along the lower streambanks. Black cottonwoods dominate the habitat at the north end of Myrtle Point and along the lower shoreline to the west. A functioning wildlife corridor exists within SR -3 between Trent Ave. and River Mile 84. This habitat was noted as high bird value habitat by Audubon experts. West of River Mile 84, the shoreline has been affected by past transportation corridors and ongoing residential development. Specifically, the area contains debris piles, cleared areas, fill slopes, and a linear abandoned road corridor that is dominated by non - native trees and herbs. Although not noted as "rare" by any state databases, the rock outcroppings west of Myrtle Point were noted to support edaphic vegetation that was not seen elsewhere in the study area. This includes buckwheat, lomatium, and sedum plants. Where the shoreline extends west of the City boundary, it appears that a Douglas fir forest community provides cover for species migrating west into Millwood. ITRES 45 City of Spokane Valley Shoreline Master Program Update February 19, 2010 Inventory and Characterization Report [TECHNICAL REVIEW DRAFT) T) 5.132 SR-3 Ecological Condition, Stressors, and Opportunities for Restoration or Conservation The following characterization of baseline ecological conditions is based on the Proper Functioning Condition Study conducted by SCCD in 2005. This ecological baseline will be used to measure changes over time as the City works to achieve the No Net Loss of Ecological Functions goal (per WAC 173 -26- 186(8)). Ecological Baseline River study segment 3 includes the majority of Spokane River Reach 6 as classified by SCCD in the 2005 PFC study. SCCD Reach 6 begins at Mirabeau Point and continues west/downstream to the approximate City of Spokane/Millwood boundary. SCCD Reach 6 was rated as being in Proper Functioning Condition but it was given a "poor- fair" ecological condition rating, presumably due to lack of adequate riparian vegetation around Plante's Ferry Park (north of the City) and the Coyote Rock area. High Quality Conservation Areas Portions of SR -3 around Myrtle Point, the Centennial Trail Bridge, and areas in- between were noted as high quality shoreline in the PFC study (SCCD 2005). The high quality determination was based upon large, intact areas of Douglas fir, mature cottonwoods, hawthorn, willows, chokecherry, serviceberry, Plante's Ferry Park, recreational floating, and rainbow trout spawning. URS noted a stand of mature pine trees just north of Trent Avenue, between Centennial Trail and the river that provides high quality forest habitat as well as shade for pools within the river along the southern shoreline. URS also noted a small patch of native blue bunchgrass prairie with a high diversity of native forbs worthy of conservation and possible expansion. This small patch may be a good location for seed collection associated with upland prairie restoration projects. URS also noted an area of slow - moving water and side - channel habitat associated with the eddy west of Myrtle Point. This area is likely to provide slow water refugia for fish when the river is at flood stage. Also, URS noted uncommon edaphic vegetation growing on the rock outcrops within the channel east of the Centennial Trail Bridge. This vegetation is sensitive and easily disturbed by rock climbing, which appears to be a common recreational activity in the area. Degraded Areas and Opportunities for Restoration The 2005 PFC study ranked restoration potential as "fair to good" for SR -3, which fully contains SCCD Reach 6. URS observed two degraded areas that would provide opportunities for enhancement of the riparian corridor within SR -3. One area is associated with historic shoreline disturbance that is evident between Trent Avenue and the Mirabeau Conservation Area. Disturbance includes concrete debris piles and cleared riparian vegetation areas east of a former industrial site; around the Centennial Trail. Areas east of this disturbed area were identified as high value bird habitat by the local Audubon Society. A second degraded area was noted west of the Centennial Trail Bridge, below the Coyote Rock housing development. This area is associated with an old road that has provided a vector for the spread of non- native herbaceous and woody plants. This area is likely to be highly impacted by forthcoming development associated with docks and/or other shoreline access features. This presents an opportunity to grant minor shoreline development permits with conditions specifying restoration of the old road to a native corridor and, thereby, balance future development with restoration of degraded areas to achieve the goal of "no net loss of shoreline ecological functions ". UBE 46 City of Spokane Valley Shoreline Master Program Update February 19, 2010 Inventory and Characterization Report 'TECHNICAL REVIEW DRAM Recouameadatioas Table 5 -16 provides a summary of ecological issues relevant to the selection of an appropriate shoreline designation and to the goal of achieving no net loss of shoreline ecological functions. Table 3 -16: Summary of LcoIo ical Issues SR -3 rgolaRieal Load %tom Ikeemsestlatleaks Re Conserve /protect existing forest areas and native prairie remnants. Expand narrow bands Recreational off -road traffic, of vegetation along the south bank east of Woody Cover camping, forthcoming Myrtle Point. Plant tall tree species south of development spawning areas for shade. Condition development applications with riparian enhancement specifications for all new shoreline development proposals Concentrated flow from Incorporate bioengineering concepts into Erosion (minor) Centennial Trail resulting in maintenance of affected shoreline areas for isolated bank erosion visual and ecological benefits. Dominance of non - native Encourage landscaping with native plants. Invasive vegetation herbaceous cover, particularly Control spread of knapweed. Support native in herbaceous upland areas herbaceous restoration projects Protect cold water refugia by restricting Non - native fish Smallmouth bass competition. vegetation removal. Limit fishing of native trout. Avoid in -water activities near known spawning areas. Ensure that clean up efforts are monitored and Contamination Flora Road Metal Site that replaced bed/shoreline cap materials are appropriate size for the local hydrologic regime. Fence around Kaiser's water Land Use Conflicts intake facility is fenced off Provide tunnel or walkway around facility resulting in wildlife barrier 5.1.4 Segment 4 Millwood City Limits to Spokane City Limits Spokane River Segment 4 (SR -4) includes only the south side of the river from the Town of Millwood boundary to the City of Spokane boundary. Segment 4 is approximately 0.5 miles long and includes a total area of 11.8 acres of shoreland within the SMP jurisdiction. The land within the shoreline jurisdiction in this river segment is fully developed and private property extends to the OFIWM. This area is entirely within the backwater of Upriver Dam. City of Spokane Valley Shoreline Master Program Update February 19, 2010 Inventory and Characterization Report - ECHNICAL REVIEW DRAFT ,.-. j .sr, / - ' ,..0i c , t,,, .-'‘. • t .,Th . .,, . -,,,,, + M ' S.73"...g".-3.":„ -; . f?, V ..-• ''' \vied 4 t A " • •`''C * all -- .• it 1 • ' den Ilark Sch utui- i y ' r . ?f " , '1"-• i a . :$1 • • s• ''.----'2.— ej l • j 0 • . i ts " a 4 I y ll'jy • • - q{ 1 -ta [ —I Clx4 11 SI SpO alle�Valley '` -'--- -" _- Mi16o0d i g- l 1 PA.ulidarii i t IA figure + $fp,*, , RiverStudySegment 4 ,� .. Ca Pt $1;x41(aW Valley POOP QSe - ' , . .- s @ v4 OA rrttt 5.1.41 Sit‘ 4 Land Use Summary The City Comprehensive Plan shows that the land use within this river segment is composed solely of Low Density Residential and is zoned as Single Family Residential. There appear three empty lots in this segment but the majority of this area is developed as single family residential with landscaped lawns. Many of the lots have bulkheads and docks. Tables 5 -17 and 5 -18 show the land use and zoning within this river segment. Table 5 -17: Land Use SR -4 Land Use Area Percent (acres) of Total Low Density Residential 11.8 1 100% Table 5 -18: Zoning SR -4 Zoning Area Percent (acres) of Total R -2 (10,000 sf lots) 11.8 100% The City Comprehensive Plan shows that the land use within this river segment is composed solely of Low Density Residential and is zoned as Single Family Residential. Table 5 -19 provides a summary of the built structures, impervious surfaces, and development intensity within the shoreline jurisdiction for this river segment. Table 5 -19: Built Environment SR -4 L Features Area 1 Percent 1 MIS - 48 City of Spokane Valley Shoreline Master Program Update February 19, 2010 Inventory and Characterization Report - Ea-RACAL REVIEW DRAFT l i- tams) , et Total R ooftops 1.6 13.6 Pavement 0.6 5.1 Gravel Surfacing 0.3 2.5 Total Impervious 2.5 21.1 Recreational Use and Access Access to the Spokane River is through private property. Public access to the river is limited. This river segment is within the backwater of the Upriver. It is understood that the City of Spokane opens up the one boat ramp located near Upriver Dam twice a year so that residents can launch their boats in the summer and remove them in the fall. Transportation Portions of South Riverway Drive are within the shoreline jurisdiction. There are no bridges over the river within this river segment. On the north side of the river, outside the city jurisdiction is Boulder Beach, a popular swimming area. Shoreline Modifications The shoreline has been fully modified by residential development within this river segment. These modifications include the construction of bulkheads at the OHWM, landscaping, and docks. There are approximately 20 houses along the shoreline in this river segment. Utilities Portions of South Riverway are located within the shoreline jurisdiction. There may be utilities located within this ROW. Environmental There are no reported environmental sites in this segment. 5,14.2 SR-4 Physical, Biological, and Archeological Characterization The stream bed materials are unknown as they are buried by sediment captured behind the dam. Streambanks, where not armored, consist of landscaped turf grass or ornamental landscaping on erodible soils. The stream channel is deeply entrenched and surrounded by bedrock outcrops, large boulder deposits, or bank armoring. Hydraulics and Water Quality Within SR -4, the river channel is backwatered by the Upriver HED. As a result, flow is minimal, water is deep, and most of the hydraulic forces exist as wave action upon the banks. The channel is both vertically and laterally stable (unlikely to migrate up or down, north or south). Biological Resources and Vegetation No rainbow trout spawning areas were observed by Parametrix in 2003 during their spawning surveys for the Avista relicensing effort. Trout populations are minimal to non - existent within this reach due to the hydraulics and low dissolved oxygen. Local anglers report little to no fish within the backwater area behind Upriver Dam. Due to the deep water characteristics of SR -4, the river is most notably used for wintering waterfowl habitat by ducks, geese, and great blue heron. When other segments of the river freeze, SR -4 provides important, unfrozen surface water habitat for waterfowl. URS 49 City of Spokane Valley Shoreline Master Program Update February 19, 2010 Inventory and Characterization Report TCHNICA , REVIEV47 DRAFT No native plant associations were observed in SR -4. Aside from a few cottonwoods, observed vegetation included landscaped ornamental plants, turf grass, or non - native, feral plant assemblages. Cultural/Archeological Resources The WISSARD database did not identify any sites within SR -4, likely because this area was not surveyed for the Centennial Trail project. S.tA. SR-4 Ecological Condition, Stressors, and Opportunities for Restoration or Conservation Ecological Baseline River study segment 4 includes a small portion of Spokane River Reach 7 as classified by SCCD in the 2005 PFC study. SCCD Reach 7 was rated "functional -at- risk" due to the abundance of shoreline modifications /armoring and the lack of native riparian vegetation. The SCCD rated the ecological condition in Reach 7 as poor to fair habitat. These ratings are consistent with the conditions noted within SR -4 (a small portion of SCCD Reach 7). High Quality Conservation Areas No portion of SR -4 was noted as high quality conservation area. However, due to the wintering waterfowl habitat provided by the open water portion of SR -4, it does provide a locally important function during times when the river freezes over elsewhere. Degraded Areas and Opportunities for Restoration The 2005 PFC study ranked restoration potential as "poor to fair" for SCCD Reach 7, which fully contains SR -4. Shorelands within SR -4 have poor restoration potential because they are fully developed. Due to the low fish presence within SR -4, aquatic habitat improvements are not likely to benefit fish populations. Recommendations The following Table provides a summary of ecological issues relevant to the selection of an appropriate shoreline designation and to the goal of achieving no net loss of shoreline ecological functions. Table 5 -20: Summary of Ecological Issues SR -4 LEcelogical Issues Local Stressors L Reemunendations Encourage shoreline residents to plant native shrub and tree species along the shoreline. Riparian Vegetation Residential development and Condition new shoreline (re)development Condition ornamental landscaping permits with riparian enhancement specifications for all new shoreline development proposals (docks, remodels, etc.) Waterfowl Habitat Motorboats Limit motor traffic during early spring and late fall/winter Local Residential herbicides and Encourage shoreline residents to avoid use of Contamination fertilizers chemical herbicides and fertilizers as these drain directly into the river. 5.2 Shelley Lake Shelley Lake is a natural lake that is privately owned and managed by the Shelley Lake HOA. The lake is located south of Sprague Avenue between Barker and Sullivan Roads. Shelley has a shoreline length of 2.12 miles and includes 28.7 acres of land within the shoreline jurisdiction. The lake receives water ITEM 50 City of Spokane Valley Shoreline Master Program Update February 19, 2010 Inventory and Characterization Report (TECHNICAL REVIEW FT] seasonally from Saltese Creek and loses water by infiltration and evaporation. As a result, lake levels fluctuate. I o Ijil• ;�� Rtf• • E.SRIA4 i i 4 L AN! :.•.' �• 0 = 1•enr- slur —. .- -- ----� • se • p • fi t. •:�. .ijj r � ry • t 1 ' • y`i . r I R I. 1 !i I 0! C I • O • G' M t Y r. 1 x , •• • • • Gavel 1 i tom �- T 1 t •.,_ ��� °: _ ti ti P . • 44444 •t .• •• •• • -..r . . r . :• 0R•II. u . 1 \•'• +piteT,E k , r . 9 ?• ■ ti - - 5 4,. /f 11., i -1- ° Central Valley ` i , ` � • • -KU +d, ,Yep o • ' — Fescue 54.; SI We s City of VON* 4 { M 5.2,1 Land Use Summary The land use around Shelley Lake is low density residential and is zoned R -3. R -3 zoning allows for 7,500 square foot lots. The entire lake shore is built out with the exception of the granite outcrop on the east side of the lake, where only one home is located. There is a potential for additional development on the east side of the lake. The area immediately around the lake is designated a common area and contains a paved pedestrian trail. Tables 5 -21 and 5 -22 show the land use and zoning within this river segment. Table 5 -21: Land Use Shelley Lake Area 1 Percent Land Use (acres) of Total Low Density Residential 28.7 100 Table 5 -22: Zoning Shelley Lake Zoning Area Percent (acres) of Total R -3 (7,500 sf lots) 28.7 100 Table 5 -23 provides a summary of the built structures, impervious surfaces, and development intensity within the shoreline jurisdiction for this river segment. VilitS 51 I City of Spokane Valley Shoreline Master Program Update February 19, 2010 Inventory and Characterization Report [TFMNICAL REVIEW DRAFT] Table 5 -23: Rai1t Environment Shelley Lake atur� .Area Pere�t (aerte) , effete' Rooftops 3.7 0 Pavement 4.6 1.6 Gravel Surfacing 0.4 15.7 Total Impervious 8.7 17.3 Recreational Use and Access Access to Shelley Lake is limited to residents and guests. The development covenants state specifically that the public has no right to use the lake. A paved pedestrian trail has been constructed around the lake in the common area. The trail is dirt and gravel on the west side along the granite outcropping. The trail includes benches and mooring areas for non - motorized boats. The lake and trail are used by residents for walking, observing wildlife and birds, fishing, and non - motorized boating. Transportation Residential collector streets are located with the shoreline jurisdiction. The streets are separated from the lake by single family residences and the common area. Drainage from the streets flow to bioswales for treatment. While the roadways are located within the shoreline jurisdiction, they do not directly impact the lake shore. There are two paved access paths to the lake. Shoreline Modifications Shoreline modifications within the common area include the paved trail around the lake, benches, three boat mooring areas, the culvert crossing/bridge at the lake inlet, and an irrigation system that covers most of the north and west shoreline. Most areas of the developed shoreline have steep gravely banks. The shoreline jurisdiction also includes many of the residential lots and some of the residential streets area. Extensive modifications to these upland areas have been made in the form of houses, landscaping, driveways, and utilities. Based on our understanding of the environment prior to the development, it is difficult to determine if the development has reduced or increased conditions for vegetation and habitat improvements. Utilities All utilities serving Shelley Lake Estates are underground and include: sanitary sewers owned by Spokane County, water service by Vera Water and Power, electric and natural gas by Avista Utilities, communications by Comcast Cable, AT &T Residential, and Qwest Residential. Environmental According to Ecology's database, there are no locations of concern at Shelley Lake. There are no water quality impairment listings on the 303(d) list. However, lake water quality is degraded during the summer months. There are many factors contributing to the poor water quality, including insufficient water quantity. Two wells are listed in the Ecology well database within the development. Cultural/Archeological Resources No sites on either the local or state registers or the NR.HP are contained within the shoreline buffer. Archaeological information may be obtained through the State Historic Preservation Office. There is a possibility of uncovering archeological resources along the shorelines of Shelley Lake. 52 City of Spokane Valley Shoreline Master Program Update February 19, 2010 Inventory and Characterization Report [TECHNICAL REVIEW DRAFT] 321.1 Shelley Lake Physical and Biological Characterization Excluding the granite outcrops and the Saltese Creek inlet areas, most of the shoreline is characterized by steep, gravely unvegetated banks. Shelley Lake is located over the SVRP aquifer. The lake was possibly formed as a scour hole during the Missoula floods related to the granite exposure on the east shore. Soils in the area are Garrison gravelly loams, which are free draining. However, the bottom of the lake is sealed, possibly due to fine grained sediments (PBS &J, 2009). Based on a preliminary evaluation done as part of the Saltese Flats Wetland Restoration Investigation, infiltration rates at Shelley Lake are estimated at an average value of 10 cfs. The calculated infiltration rate is much lower than found in the gravels of the SVRP aquifer. Hydraulics Annual flow to Shelley Lake has been modeled at between 2,613 and 4,090 acre - feet/year (Kahle and Bartolino, 2007). Lake levels have been measured in 2007 through 2009 by the Shelley Lake HOA. Measured lake levels range between 2000.9 feet (December 2007), and 2017 feet (April 2009). The OHWM elevation was determined to be 2013.7 feet by Ecology in 1993. Water generally flows into the lake from the spring melt, which is typically between mid -April through mid -June. Saltese creek is then blocked (dammed) by users along Saltese Flats. According to the Shelley Lake HOA the higher water level in 2008 created better conditions for fish and fauna and a decrease in algae and milfoil. The lake has an average depth of about 25 feet (ShelleyLake.org). Shelley Lake has no outlet, and the lake level is controlled by infiltration through the lake bottom. To prevent flooding, the upper lake elevation is maintained by diverting high flows in Saltese Creek to the Steen Road Gravel Pit. The drainage area is approximately 15,000 acres (USGS, Streamstats) and includes the north side of Mica Peak and Saltese Flats (Figure 3 -2). The drainage area is located entirely within Washington State. Water Quality According to Ecology's database there are no locations of concern at Shelley Lake. There are no water quality impairment listings on the 303(d) list. However, lake water quality is degraded during the summer months. There are many factors contributing to the poor water quality, including insufficient water quantity. Two wells are listed in the Ecology well database within the development. A limited amount of water quality data are available for Shelley Lake. The SCCD has information on conductivity, pH and DO from July and August 2007 collected through a volunteer sampling program. Table 5 -24 summarizes this information. The lake is categorized as eutrophic (overly nutrient -rich) and likely phosphorous limited since large amounts of nitrogen are available from farming on the Saltese Flats (PBS &J, 2009). Table 5 -24: Shelley Lake Water Quality Data Depth pH L I I b Ceoductirity Us' staved Om es. I Depth(meters) Te Iwrature - (meters) (µmhos /cm) mg/1 Percent Secchi Total Air Water Jul -07 Surface 9.17 191.1 8.83 108.2 2 6.4 25 22.5 1 9.12 193.8 5.42 68 23.4 2 9.16 192.5 5.25 64.6 22.6 3 9.1 193.9 5.11 61.1 21 4 8.45 208.3 3.28 37.6 19.1 5 7.66 214 1.47 16.2 17.1 6 7.42 219.4 1.25 13.7 17 URS 53 City of Spokane Valley Shoreline Master Program Update February 19, 2010 Inventory and Characterization Report MICA REVIEW DRAFT Aug -07 - � Surface 8.8 202.1 9.2 104 1.8 6.2 30 22.8 1 8.8 203.3 5.4 62.2 23.9 2 8.93 201.6 5.27 61.1 23.5 3 8.85 198.9 5.15 59.3 23 4 8.32 209.3 4.09 46 21.7 5 7.76 230.4 2.01 22 20.4 6 7.17 251.7 1.42 15.4 19.8 Samples taken at 10:00 am each sample day. Water quality in the lake is impacted by activities along Saltese Flats and Saltese Creek, as well as lawn care practices in the residential lots adjacent to the lake. Stormwater runoff from roads is treated in bioswales and infiltrated into the ground. Stormwater runoff from the lake shore trail and yards drains directly into the lake. Due to the seasonal flow regime, fluctuating lake levels, and lack of inflow during the summer months maintaining lake water quality will be difficult. The EIS for Shelley Lake (Ramm, 1994) says that water quality in Shelley Lake had been degraded prior to the development of Shelley Lake Estates by upstream and possibly on -site agricultural activities, as well as peat mining on the Saltese Flats. Critical Areas The City of Spokane Valley maps the following critical areas around Shelley Lake: • Wetlands - associated with Saltese Creek at the southeast end of the lake • Fish and wildlife habitat conservation area (per PHS, below) • Critical aquifer recharge area (entire Spokane Valley) • Special flood hazard area (includes the lake, associated wetland and Saltese Creek) Priority Habitats & Species (PHS) Saltese Creek between the Saltese Flats and Shelley Lake is mapped as a riparian corridor by the WDFW. There are no records of any state endangered, threatened, sensitive plants, or high quality native plant communities. Biological Resources and Vegetation The 1994 EIS (Ramm) reported the following species as observed or evidence of their presence was observed: Ring necked and cinnamon teal ducks, great blue heron, red tailed hawk, pheasant, quail, flycatchers, killdeer, swallows, robins, flickers, kestrels, wrens, chickadees, great horned owl, field mice, voles, squirrels, marmots, turtles, skunks, large mouth bass and perch. The Shelley lake HOA lists Canadian geese, ducks, osprey, pheasant, quail, blue heron, white tail deer, marmots, rabbits, fish, frogs, turtles and many other species as being present around the lake (ShelleyLake.org). Neighborhood sightings within the project area include hawk, owls, Oregon junco, magpies, meadowlark, hummingbirds, evening grosbeak, and rufous sided towhee. Shelley Lake does not support a significant fish population due to fluctuating water levels and poor water quality. The wetland area was not reported to contain nesting opportunities for waterfowl. The lake does receive use by migrant and resident waterfowl, mostly during the breading season (Ramm, 1994). The east side of the lake supports a ponderosa pine community along the granite exposure. The steep slopes and rocky areas also support native bunch grasses, perennial forbs, and small native shrubs. A seasonal wetland area in the northeast lake quadrant supports a stand of willows and quaking aspen (Populus tremuloides) as well as hawthorne and wild rose shrubs. This wetland, while small in area, has healthy dense vegetation. The second seasonal wetland located along Saltese Creek contains fine grained URS 54 City of Spokane Valley Shoreline Master Program Update February 19, 2010 Inventory and Characterization Report [TECHNICAL REVIEW >1 AFT! soils also supports a variety of sedges, although they are small in number. The southerly wetland has a limited water supply in the summer and is seasonally dry. The rest of the lake shore is steep, but stable, and appears to be mostly gravels typical of the Garrison soil series. Three vegetation sample sites were established around the lake during the shoreline inventory. The sample plots showed a dominance of native species within the tree and shrub stratum and a dominance of non - native vegetation within the herbaceous stratum. Three Chinese elms are located along the trail and have the potential to spread. Cultural/Archeological Resources Neither the state register nor the NRHP identify historic resources within the SMP area around Shelley Lake. However, as with all areas around water bodies, there is a strong likelihood of uncovering historic resources along the shorelines of Shelley Lake. 52.12 Shelley Lake Ecological Condition, Stressors, and Opportunities for Restoration or Conservation Ecological Baseline Unlike the Spokane River, no proper functioning condition assessment was performed for the Shelley Lake shoreline areas. However, the following list provides a snapshot of the factors influencing the baseline ecological condition of the lake and surrounding shorelands. • Upland habitats east of the lake appear to be in fair condition and functioning adequately for forage and migration; riparian plant species diversity is relatively low and competition with non- native herbaceous communities is high. • The north, west, and south shorelines are completely developed and lack shade producing vegetation. • Flows and lake levels are seasonally variable with very low summer flow. Upstream land uses around Saltese Creek have been altered by forestry and agriculture and likely increase the degree of flow variability. Along this reach the floodplain appears to be functioning adequately and the creek appears to be vertically and laterally stable. • Large woody debris (LWD) was not observed in the lake or creek in sufficient amounts to create structured habitats. • Water quality is dependent upon stream flow. During summer periods low dissolved oxygen and high temperatures are the predominant water quality issue. • The Saltese Creek drainage basin collects pollutants such as sediment, deicing chemicals, animal wastes, oil and grease, heavy metals, pesticides, and fertilizers. These are carried down to the lake via seasonal flow. • The sediment regime is characterized by very high sediment loads during flood flows resulting in shoreline conditions that hinder establishment of native shoreline vegetation. The hydrology of the Saltese Flats /Shelley Lake system is typical for a western dryland environment. The hydrologic regime of the lake is not likely to have changed much since the Saltese Flats were drained for agricultural purposes. High spring flows fill the lake in a typical year. Evaporation and infiltration lower the water level throughout the summer. The lake level has been artificially maintained in years past from a nearby well. This may be an option in the future for improving summer time water quality. High Quality Conservation Areas The east side of the lake is a granite exposure that supports a ponderosa pine community. Due to the developed and unvegetated state of the remaining shoreline areas, this habitat provides important fish (shade) and wildlife habitat along the lake. EMS 55 City of Spokane Valley Shoreline Master Program Update February 19, 2010 Inventory and Characterization Report TECHNICAL REVIEW AFT Degraded Areas and Opportunities for Restoration Due to the lake's 16 -foot down zone, the steep, gravelly shorelines support little vegetation. The Shelley Lake HOA has been planting the shorelines with native plants, but has not had significant success. The lake inlet (south side) has an associated seasonal wetland that would benefit from shade and increased species richness. The small wetland area located on the north side of the granite exposure would benefit from the removal of reed canarygrass and replacement with native lakeshore sedges that better suit waterfowl. Prior to the development of Shelley Lake Estates, cattle grazing significantly disrupted native vegetation, and eliminated most of the high value habitat along the lake. Knapweed dominated much of the area. In 2007 the Shelley Lake HOA with assistance from SCCD, DOE, and WDFW began the multi -year "Shelley Lake Shoreline Habitat Enhancement Project." The project goal is to rehabilitate the shoreline with native grasses, shrubs, and trees to enhance native habitat while maintaining and enhancing the visual aspect of the lake for residents. In 2007 and 2008 the homeowners cleared noxious weeds from the shoreline and planted native plants. In 2009 high lake levels submerged and destroyed most of the plantings. As part of this project an irrigation system was installed along the paved trail. The Shelley Lake HOA is continuing to pursue establishing vegetation along the shoreline, but due to seasonal lake level fluctuation, establishing the plantings has been difficult. Recommendations Table 5-25 is a summary of ecological issues relevant to the selection of an appropriate shoreline designation and achieving the goal of no net loss of shoreline ecological functions. Table 5 -25: Summary of Ecological Issues Shelley Lake ,colatical Issues i•etal Suwon Retomenadatioas Residential Conserve /protect existing plant communities development, along the east side of the lake. Plant riparian Riparian Habitat Quality ornamental trees and shrubs around the wetland area landscaping southeast of the lake. Plant native shrubs and grasses along the upper periphery of the lake margin. Minimal summer Enhance wetland habitat with native shade - Wetland Habitat Quality flow, non - native producing trees or shrubs. Attempt to store vegetation more water via increased flow and/or hydraulic impoundment. Presence of non- Encourage landscaping with native plants. Invasive Cover native herbaceous Continue native herbaceous restoration cover projects. Remove Chinese elm and reed canarygrass. Low water Become involved in the Saltese Flats discharge during enhancement project to secure higher summer Water Temperature summer, lack of base flow support. Plant/maintain shade shade producing vegetation along the creek outlet and associated wetland areas. Redevelopment Restrict shoreline development below walking potential along trail. Condition future redevelopment with Land Use Conflicts shoreline RHA improvement standards. Change granite exposure zoning to lesser density or conservation area. URS 56 City of Spokane Valley Shoreline Master Program Update February 19, 2010 Inventory and Characterization Report - - OINICAL REVIEW DRAFT It is possible that wetland habitat improvements will benefit water quality, and may even improve summer base flows. By increasing the residence time of stream flow in wetland areas upstream of the lake, the wetland may filter and adsorb nutrients, metals, etc. within the water column. The associated wetland has been disturbed on its eastern side by the construction of a gravel access road. 5.3 Park Road and Sullivan Road Gravel Pits Under RCW 78.44.050 DNR is granted exclusive authority for regulating the reclamation of surface mines. Reclamation plans are developed as part of the surface mining approval process. Reclamation plans typically include sequential phasing of mining and revegetation which allows for reclamation of portions of the mine while still active. Reclamation must be completed within two years after abandonment of the mine. County or Municipality approval for surface mining is an element of the permitting process. The reclamation plans for both the Park and Sullivan Road pits designate that the pits will be left as lakes and an area for wildlife habitat. ; ' ' PARK ROAD PIT ::4 - .y `. J ROAD A SULLIVAN ROA „!=" , t i " ? 1� . _ L r ri - - -,:: r 0 o ; , 1 F ! .' ° - s o w e 1 y ° , i P, t y £ t `` — _ fig S 1L E SPRAG AVE o ` \ • vi - ! "y, , J i f ' ' - - i ,. �, i C . 0 I 1. ? +N-ii `-1 4 ' f y id r _ Legend N Figure 5 -7; Gravel Pits City of Spokane Yaiiey . omits k — - -i k 1 DIRS 9 $16 }A, aatickAr' 3 0 SAM Z. O lift ■ 5.3.1 Park Road Pit The Park Road pit is located on 98 acres within the City of Spokane Valley between Park Road and Thierman Road in the SW 'A S13, T25 N, R43 EWM. This pit is owned and operated by Central Pre - Mix. The Park Road pit is used for: sand and gravel mining, aggregate processing, ready -mix concrete production, occasional asphalt production, and other related activities. The Park Road pit consists of a 69 -acre water body with an irregular shape and no outlet. This water body is the result of the mining operation penetrating into the Spokane Rathdrum Valley Aquifer. The water surface elevation fluctuates between 1890 feet and 1900 feet above mean sea level. The shoreline is sloped at 2:1 and transfers to a 3:1 slope near the water surface for safety. The shoreline banks are generally 40 to 50 in height. Mining activities have been carried out to a depth of 160 feet below the water line to an elevation of 1740 feet. MS 57 City of Spokane Valley Shoreline Master Program Update February 19, 2010 Inventory and Characterization Report r hCI-RtcAL REVIEW DRAFT' 5.3.1.1 Park Road Pit Land Use Summary The entire Park Road pit has a current land use of Heavy Industrial with a zoning designation of Heavy Industrial (I -2). Recreation Use and Access This is an active surface mining site and there is no public access to the water body. The shoreline is composed of gravels at a slope of 2:1 which present a danger of falling to untrained persons. There is no intent to provide public access to the pit at this time. It is known that birders use the pit for the Christmas bird count. Transportation Theirman and E. Heacox Roads are located with the shoreline jurisdiction along the western and northern edge of the pit. Theirman changes to Heacox Road at the northwest corner of the Park Road Pit. Utilities Three septic tanks and associated drain fields are located within the shoreline jurisdiction. Overhead power is also located within the jurisdiction. Equipment including conveyors, dredges, sorting and washing facilities are located within the shoreline jurisdiction. Shoreline Modifications Sand and gravel mining have exposed the aquifer and created the existing shoreline. This is not a natural environment. Reclamation/vegetation of the shoreline will occur within two years after the mine is abandoned. Portions of the pit have become revegetated by natural colonization. Environmental According to Ecology's database this gravel pit is not a location of concern. Archaeological/Historic Resources No sites on either the local or state registers or the NRHP are noted within the shoreline jurisdiction. Specific archaeological sites have not been identified to our knowledge in this area. 5.3.12 Park Road Pit Physical and Biological Characterization Geology and Soils The soils at the Park Road Pit are composed of Garrison gravelly loam. The Garrison series is made up of somewhat excessively drained, gravelly or stony soils. Garrison gravelly loam is the dominant soil type in the City of Spokane Valley. Water Quality According to Ecology's database this gravel pit is not a location of concern Critical Areas The gravel pit is located over and in the SVRP aquifer critical area. Biological Resources and Vegetation • VJELS 58 City of Spokane Valley Shoreline Master Program Update February 19, 2010 Inventory and Characterization Report RECIVICAL REVIEW DA1TI1 Because the site is actively mined, the entire perimeter of the site is fenced. This limits wildlife use to birds and any fish that may have been stocked in the pit. Audubon representatives indicate that this pit is known to receive a high diversity and density of neotropical songbirds and waterfowl. The shoreline of the Park Road pit is a constructed and not a natural shoreline environment. According to the 1995 reclamation plan, prepared by DEA, "Revegetation of graded slopes will utilize native plant materials to enhance the natural character of the grading plan, provide aesthetic appeal, and provide a diversity of habitat." The upland slopes of the site will be planted with Ponderosa Pine, Douglas Hawthorn, Western Chokecherry, and Serviceberry. Slopes near the water's edge will be planted with Black Cottonwood, Pacific Willow, Coyote Willow, and Red Osier Dogwood to create a riparian zone. Created wetland fringes will be constructed and planted with Bulrushes, Cattails, and Sedges. Access was not permitted within the mine site during the 2009 inventory but off -site observation indicated that volunteer cottonwoods have already begun to colonize the lower shoreline around the water edge. Priority Habitats & Species There are currently no classifications for priority habitat or wildlife corridors at the Park Road pit. Archaeological/Historic Resources The WISSARD database has no records for this site. 13.13 Park Road Pit Ecological Condition, Stressors, and Opportunities tor Restoration or Conservation Ecological Baseline The pit is a private operation that is not open to the public and has not been assessed using a quantifiable methodology such as Proper Functioning Condition. Based on offsite observations it would appear that the ecological conditions of the site are currently impaired by ongoing mining activities, as is expected. Conversations with local wildlife experts indicate that the area is used heavily by songbirds and waterfowl. Degraded Areas and Opportunities for Restoration Mining activities have created a new, expanding shoreline area. As such it can not be described as "degraded" because it was not a pre - existing, natural shoreline feature. In accordance with the 1995 revised reclamation plan, the shoreline is to be planted as the mining operations move to subsequent phases. Perpetual stewardship of the reclaimed shoreline environment is planned. There are not any known areas of degradation or erosion to the shoreline at this time. Wildlife habitat enhancement has been included in the reclamation plan. These enhancements are slated to include the creation of shallow water habitat to encourage the growth of aquatic flora and promote use by aquatic fauna. Nesting boxes will also be placed amongst the upper portions of the shoreline. 5.3.2 Sullivan Road Pit The Sullivan Road gravel pit is owned and operated by Central Pre -Mix. The Sullivan Road gravel pit has been an active sand and gravel mine since 1980. The pit is located on 235 acres north of the Spokane River between Sullivan Road and Flora Road. The Union Pacific railroad tracks are immediately to the north of the site. The Flora Pit Road transects the south end of the property. As a condition of the 1963 land acquisition agreement with the County; the Flora Pit Road is a County easement for access to the 59 City of Spokane Valley Shoreline Master Program Update February 19, 2010 Inventory and Characterization Report TECHNICAL REVIEW pT Flora Shop site. Central Pre -Mix is under obligation with the County to construct a 60 -foot County roadway should the Flora Pit Road be removed. The revegetated shoreline will consist of varying slopes between a 5:1 to a 2:1. The water surface elevation will be at approximately 1940 feet and will have a depth of 150 feet. 1.321 Sullivan Road Pit Land Use Summary The entire Sullivan Road pit has a current land use of Heavy Industrial with a zoning designation of Heavy Industrial (I -2). According to the reclamation plan a 130 -acre lake will remain at the terminus of mining operation offset from the Spokane River by 250 feet. A 600 -foot setback from Sullivan Road will be retained for future use. Recreational Use and Access This is an active surface mining site and there is no public access to the water body. The shoreline is composed of gravels at a slope of 2:1 which present a danger of falling to untrained persons. There is no intent to provide public access to the pit at this time. The County does have an easement through the south of the site to access the County's Flora Road Shop. Transportation The Sullivan Road pit is bound by Sullivan Road to the west, Flora Road to the East, and the Union Pacific Railroad to the north. The Flora Pit Road transects the south of the site between the pit and the Spokane River. The County has an easement through the Flora Pit Road to the County facilities on the west side of Flora Road. Central Pre -Mix and the County made an agreement upon the land acquisition in 1963 that should Flora Pit Road be removed Central Pre -Mix would construct a 60 -foot County roadway from Sullivan Road to the entrance of the Flora Road shop site. Shoreline Modifications Sand and gravel mining have exposed the aquifer and created the existing shoreline. It is not a natural surface water environment. Reclamation of the shoreline will follow the completion of each mining phase, or two years after the termination of mining activities. Perpetual stewardship of the site is planned to retain the site once remediation is complete. Remediation will provide native vegetation, as well as wildlife habitat. Utilities Septic tank, overhead power, natural gas, registered class A well. Equipment including conveyors, dredges, sorting and washing facilities are located within the shoreline jurisdiction. Environmental According to Ecology's database there are no locations of concern within the reach. There are no water quality impairment listings on the 303(d) list. Central Pre -Mix has been active in a water quality monitoring program at this site prior exposure of the aquifer by mining operations. Cultural/Archaeological Resources No sites on either the local or state registers or the NRHP are noted within the shoreline jurisdiction. Specific archaeological sites have not been identified to our knowledge in this area. 60 City of Spokane Valley Shoreline Master Program Update February 19, 2010 Inventory and Characterization Report TECHNICAL REVIEW WAFT 5322 Sullivan Road Pit Physical and Biological Characterization Geology and Soils The soils at the Park Road Pit are composed of Garrison gravelly loam. The Garrison series is made up of somewhat excessively drained, gravelly or stony soils. Garrison gravelly loam is the dominant soil type in the City of Spokane Valley. Priority Habitats and Species There is currently no PH &S Mapping within the Sullivan Road Pit shoreline areas. Biological Resources and Vegetation Because the site is actively mined, the entire perimeter of the site is fenced. This limits wildlife use to birds and any fish that may have been stocked in the pit. Audubon representatives indicate that this pit is known to receive a high diversity and density of neotropical songbirds and waterfowl. The shoreline of the Park Road pit is a constructed and not a natural shoreline environment. According to the 1995 reclamation plan, prepared by DEA, "Revegetation of graded slopes will utilize native plant materials to enhance the natural character of the grading plan, provide aesthetic appeal, and provide a diversity of habitat." The upland slopes of the site will be planted with Ponderosa Pine, Douglas Hawthorn, Western Chokecherry, and Serviceberry. Slopes near the water's edge will be planted with Black Cottonwood, Pacific Willow, Coyote Willow, and Red Osier Dogwood to create a riparian zone. Created wetland fringes will be constructed and planted with Bulrushes, Cattails, and Sedges. Access was not permitted within the mine site during the 2009 inventory but off -site observation indicated that volunteer cottonwoods have already begun to colonize the lower shoreline around the water edge. Priority Habitats & Species There are currently no classifications for priority habitat or wildlife corridors at the Park Road pit. Archaeological/Historic Resources The WISSARD database has no records for this site. Critical Areas The gravel pits is located over and in the SVRP aquifer critical area. 53.2.3 Sullivan Road Pit Ecological Condition, Stressors, and Opportunities for Restoration or Conservation Ecological Baseline The pit is a private operation that is not open to the public and has not been assessed using a quantifiable methodology such as Proper Functioning Condition. Based on offsite observations it would appear that the ecological conditions of the site are currently constrained by ongoing mining activities, as is to be expected. Conversations with local wildlife experts indicate that the area is used by songbirds and waterfowl. URS 61 City of Spokane Valley Shoreline Master Program Update February 19, 2010 Inventory and Characterization Report TCCICAL REVIEW DRAFT Degraded Areas and Opportunities for Restoration Mining activities have created a new, expanding shoreline area. As such it can not be described as "degraded" because it was not a pre - existing, natural feature. Rather, it is a nascent waterbody created for industrial applications that may transition into a different land use in several decades. In accordance with the 1995 revised reclamation plan; the shoreline is to be planted as the current mining operations move to the next phase. Perpetual stewardship of the reclaimed shoreline environment is planned; the entire shoreline is targeted for riparian cover and conservation U City of Spokane Valley Shoreline Master Program Update February 19, 2010 Inventory and Characterization Report _ - [TECHNICAL REVIEW DRAFT' 6.0 SHORELINE USE ANALYSIS Updating an SMP requires a shoreline use analysis in order to estimate the future demand for shoreline space and identify potential land use conflicts. The following analysis includes a discussion of preferred shoreline uses and an evaluation of existing and planned land uses, total acreage available, and percentage vacant lands by zoning category within the 200 -foot SMP jurisdiction along the City's shorelines. Preferred shoreline uses are identified in the SMP Guidelines (WAC 173- 26- 201(2)(d)). Preferred uses are those that are unique to or dependent on a shoreline location. These include the following, in order of preference: • Water Dependent — Cannot exist in a location that is not adjacent to water. • Water Related — Not intrinsically dependent but whose economic viability is dependent upon a waterfront location. • Water Enjoyment— Recreational or other use that requires public access. When determining allowable uses or resolving use conflicts, the following criteria should be considered: • Provide appropriate areas for protection and restoration of ecological functions. • Provide areas for water - dependent and associated water - related issues. • Provide areas for water - related and water enjoyment uses that are compatible with ecological protection and restoration objectives. • Locate single - family residential uses where appropriate and where development can occur without significant impact to ecological functions or displacement of water - dependent uses. • Limit non - water - oriented uses to those locations where the above - described uses are inappropriate or where they demonstrably contribute to the objectives of the SMA. 6.1 Current Shoreline Use Within the City, there are approximately 726 acres under the jurisdiction of the SMA. This accounts for approximately 3% of the 24,464 acres within City limits. Per Table 6 -1, below, the majority of the shoreline zone (42 %) is held in parks /open space. This is followed by Industrial zoning, which is associated with the gravel pits and Kaiser Aluminum. Low density residential zoning accounts for 16% of the shoreline zone. A combination of other zoning categories, including Mixed Use, Commercial, and Public ROW account for less than 10% of the shoreline zone, combined. Shoreline areas lacking a zoning designation include 287.46 acres of open water and 20 acres of public right -of -way. Table 6-1: Summary of Zoning Categories within Areas Under SMA Jurisdiction Zuni'g Catcgor L Aereage 1 % I Industrial 153 32.30% Mixed Use 29 6.10% Parks /Open Space 201 42.41% Low Density 76 16.00% Residential Commercial 7 1.47% Railroad ROW 8 1.72% During the prior 20 -year planning period, the majority of new development occurred within lands having a Residential, Mixed Use, or Commercial zoning designation. RS 63 I - City of Spokane Valley Shoreline Master Program Update February 19, 2010 Inventory and Characterization Report - =CAL REVIEW DRAFT The Spokane River currently receives moderate in -water recreational use due to the hydraulics of the Spokane River, which provides prized floating conditions for non - motorized boats, rafts, and kayaks (rapids, water play areas, moderate to rapid flow). The northern shoreland areas receive moderate hiking and angling uses at specific, publicly - accessible areas, particularly around Sullivan Park. Due to an abundance of public park land and access provided by the Centennial Trail, the southern shoreland areas receive a good deal of recreational use by bicyclist and pedestrians. 6.2 Projected Shoreline Use The U.S. Census Bureau determined that 80,927 people lived in Spokane Valley on April 1, 2000. As of April 1, 2009, the Washington State Office of Financial Management estimate for Spokane Valley was 89,440. This figure represents an annual growth rate of approximately 1.5 percent, which is consistent with past estimated growth rates in the Spokane Valley area. Using this growth rate, the estimated 2025 population of Spokane Valley is 114,765, or an increase of 30,815 persons (Spokane Valley 2009). Planners often estimate a regions ability to support additional growth by quantifying developable lands that are currently listed as "vacant" in the City Assessor's tax parcel database. Such a land quantity analysis (LQA) was conducted by the City of Spokane Valley Planning Department staff in 2009 to update their comprehensive plan. Using the LQA data, there are currently 48.95 acres of land categorized as "Vacant" within the City's shoreline zones (see Figure 6 -1, Spokane River Land Use Capacity Analysis). T ' r .1102_ r IL - 1 .t �'� r-1,: w - - a ,o, ' - --.- ' ,, ' ? '. : ' ' ,o,', , -, :rki - . s ' ' '.. 7 - .T. A''' ' ..3:,,‘A 'N I- - 4'eri � r►3' �, ° Spokane lY t al Srde srf ii! , j rr it 4 r-i city lows. Vacant Sboreb cts by Zoning ' ' " : • : ' _ s , ' f FvbicShoredneFrotest/ y r w i � °ice-- V 1 E] SMAReiceka L_ Reo net vw V Figure 4-1 SpoAane RkerStioretne lase Analysis r q t. ~ i+ a City of Spokane Valley ' 1 . ‘ ., % ,y s UM s� � . - • Spok RAor - Nest Side of C ', The majority of vacant land (57 %) is associated with lands zoned as "Mixed Use Center" (MUC). The MUC zoning designation allows two or more uses on a site that can either be vertically or horizontally mixed and allows for employment, lodging, and retail along with higher density residential uses. Land with "Heavy Industrial" zoning accounts for the second largest vacant land zoning category within the shoreline zone (34 %). Vacant residential lands (8 %) account for a small portion of the remaining developable vacant lands within the shoreline zone. I. i .'.; 64 City of Spokane Valley Shoreline Master Program Update February 19, 2010 Inventory and Characterization Report [TECHNICAL REVIEW AFT] Table 6-2: Laud Quantity Acreage Analysis Zoalatg 17stgAatioa I Acreage I ' Residential 4.15 8% Heavy Industrial 16.72 34% Mixed Use Center 28.08 57% Total 48,95 100% Based upon a review of vacant lands intersecting the shoreline zone, the bulk of future development potential lies within the area between the Centennial Trail Bridge and Millwood (Coyote Rock development) and areas east of Trent Street on both sides of the river. Although zoned as Mixed Use Residential, the proposed Coyote Rock developments are all single family residential based on historic platting. However, areas east of Trent, on the southern shoreline, have a greater likelihood of being developed as high density residential with limited mixed commercial uses. Vacant industrial parcels east of Trent Street, on the north side of the river, have the potential to become developed in a manner that could affect the shoreline; however, access to these parcels is limited due to the railroad. Additional areas with development potential are limited to dispersed fragments of parcels with industrial residential, or mixed use zoning designations. Many of these lack adequate access, utilities, or are otherwise constrained in a manner that limits development potential (such as by utility easements or lack of public access). The majority of areas under SMA jurisdiction within the City are either not developable (e.g. park land) or have already been developed. Some minor redevelopment and infill are expected within residential shoreland areas, particularly within SR -1; however, this would be restricted from infringing upon park lands and, as such, have little direct effect on the current state of shoreline ecosystem functions. The primary affect on Spokane River's shorelines is expected to come from increased recreation. Due the presence of the Centennial Trail and widespread public park land throughout the river corridor, increased populations within the region have direct access to the majority of the river's shorelines through the City, particularly along the southern shoreline due to the Centennial Trail. Additionally, the City is likely to expand access to the shoreline areas per the goals of the SMA and public input received thus far. Additional development around Shelley Lake will also result in increased recreational use of the lake, albeit only from the private homeowners that live within the gated community (and guests thereof). The Sullivan Pit is expected to continue functioning as a private industrial site throughout the foreseeable planning period (20 years). However, the Park Road Pit is nearing the end of active mining and will likely transition into a natural space land use over the course of the next 20 years, per the terms of the reclamation plan. It is expected that, under the SMA, access will be a goal of the future use of the Park Road Pit, however, this would likely only happen if the land became public. If the site remains private, access would be unlikely due to liability and insurance issues. Based on this estimate of projected shoreline uses and current land availability, it appears that shorelines within the City will be able to accommodate future demand for shoreline development and recreational uses. Primarily due to the widespread state park land along the inner riparian shoreline areas, t appears that the current and projected balance of shoreline land uses, including recreation, residential, mixed use, and industrial uses are adequate to meet current and future demands while maintaining valuable shoreline ecosystem functions. TORS 65 City of Spokane Valley Shoreline Master Program Update February 19, 2010 Inventory and Characterization Report tTCIVICAL REVIEW DRMTI 6,3 Potential Conflicts Primary conflicts will arise from the attempt to balance recreational river use with the protection and conservation of priority habitats (riparian conservation) and species (red -band trout). Growing use of shoreline areas is likely to result in additional informal access trails, which result in habitat fragmentation and erosion, as is seen along the river banks between the Sullivan Park and the beach below. Additionally, informal camp sites and litter will likely have a negative effect on existing habitat quality via clearing and spread of noxious weeds. This process can be currently witnessed along the southern shoreline in SR -2. Residential growth in the Coyote Rock development area will likely further degrade a historically disturbed shoreline area due to increased shoreline access pressure. Such pressure would likely result in both formal and informal access route construction. The shoreline will likely experience high intensity shoreline use, including potential dock construction. Dock construction and associated watercraft use would result in a conflict between fish & wildlife habitat conservation, water quality, and recreation due to the potential for increased bank erosion, petroleum pollution, and removal of vegetation cover. Because this area lacks the buffer provided elsewhere along the shoreline by public park land, this area has the potential to resemble the residential area west of Millwood in SR -4. The risk of high intensity shoreline use also conflicts with the potential for improved wildlife migration corridor functions. Due to higher quality riparian habitats to the east and west of the development area, the degraded shorelines through the Coyote Rock development area have the potential to provide improved migration corridor functions with fairly simple riparian vegetation enhancements. Future development of the MUC -zoned vacant lands and infill or redevelopment of low density residential areas along the southern shoreline are likely to occur above the Centennial Trail and, as such, have little direct affect on the high quality riparian forest/shrub habitats. Impacts are more likely to affect degraded grassland communities along the upper river banks. These likely impacts provide an impetus for native grassland conservation and restoration in order to achieve no net loss of ecological shoreline functions. Additionally, as with new shoreline residential development, new construction in this area is likely to result in impacts associated with increased shoreline access pressure. New industrial development east of Trent Street, along the northern shoreline, has the potential to result in conflicting "shoreline dependent" development, recreation, and wildlife habitat uses. This area is already highly degraded by historic shoreline alterations, including old railroad infrastructure, utilities, maintenance roads, and drainage infrastructure. Future development may affect recreational values by clearing vegetation and constructing incongruous development in an otherwise scenic area. As mentioned above, the Park Road Pit is likely to transition from industrial land uses to open space /natural area conservation land uses. This may result in potential conflicts that are inherent with any attempt at natural resource conservation when proposed within a matrix of high intensity land uses. For example, the area is surrounded by industrial and commercial development and interstate transportation corridors, thus not an ideal conservation area for terrestrial wildlife. The area has the potential to provide important wintering waterfowl habitat, as well as general songbird habitat but the value of such habitat is limited by the movement, noise, glare, and pollution sources located around this pit. Additionally, the use of such an area for recreation conflicts with avian habitat goals and may not be appropriate without safety improvements. 6.4 Management Recommendations In addition to the recommendations provided in Section 5, this section provides a summary of general recommendations related to the goals of the SMA. Future shoreline developments, including infill and Me.ES 66 City of Spokane Valley Shoreline Master Program Update February 19, 2010 Inventory and Characterization Report [TECHNICAL REVIEW DRAM redevelopment proposals, have the opportunity to be allowed in a manner that balances growth with shoreline enhancements to maintain no net loss of ecological functions. This balance would occur through the issuance of shoreline substantial development or conditional use permits, which can be granted with special conditions requiring native plant establishment or similar enhancement activity. Similarly, future capital improvement projects undertaken by the City in shoreline zones can be tailored to fit the goals of public access, restoration of degraded shoreline habitats, and avoidance of high - quality riparian areas. 6,4.E Recommendations for the Spokane River Under RCW 90.58.020, the legislature declared that the development of SMPs for shorelines of statewide significance, shall give preference to shoreline uses in the following order: (1) Recognize and protect the statewide interest over local interest; (2) Preserve the natural character of the shoreline; (3) Result in long term over short term benefit; (4) Protect the resources and ecology of the shoreline; (5) Increase public access to publicly owned areas of the shorelines; (6) Increase recreational opportunities for the public in the shoreline; (7) Provide for any other element as defined in RCW 90.58.100 deemed appropriate or necessary. The following recommendations provide a means for implementing these preferential uses for the Spokane River, a shoreline of statewide significance. Protecting Statewide Interest The City is currently supporting statewide interests for the Spokane River. Regional plans for the Spokane River identify improved recreational use, improved water quality, and support for native fish stocks as regional goals- an appropriate surrogate for statewide interest. Presence of the Centennial Trail throughout most of the City is emblematic of the regional recreation corridor that the City of Spokane Valley supports. Impacts to water quality from Industrial point sources and combined sewer overflows are very limited within the City, despite being a large population center. Regarding support for native fish stocks, the City has little ability to affect the changes that are most necessary for improving native fish runs. Preserving the Natural Shoreline Character The city's greatest shoreline asset with regard to preserving the natural shoreline character is the large area of public land under the ownership of the Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission. It is recommended that the City consider establishing shoreline designations for these areas that protect their natural character and functions. These areas provide important shoreline ecological functions and should be conserved and protected in perpetuity to meet the SMA goals of No Net Loss of Shoreline Ecological Function. Areas where historic land uses cleared vegetation and introduced roads or other infrastructure should be slated for restoration where feasible, particularly near the shoreline. Areas prone to uncontrolled river access result in bank erosion. This is particularly notable below Sullivan Park in SR -2. By establishing formal access points in high intensity use areas, such erosion may be limited. This may require coordination with the State Parks and Recreation Department. Uses resulting in Long Term Benefits Similar to preserving the natural shoreline character, the large, linear tracts of park land along the City's shorelines provide long term conservation of riparian habitats and high - quality visual aesthetics and URS 67 City of Spokane Valley Shoreline Master Program Update February 19, 2010 Inventory and Characterization Report [TECHNICAL REVIEW DRAFT) ecological functions that support enhanced habitat functions for wildlife and recreational opportunities. Therefore long term conservation, protection and restoration (where applicable) of these areas is seen as the best way to result in long term benefits. New development in shoreline areas should be allowed in a manner that includes a provision for the improvement of shoreline ecological functions. This would allow growth in a manner that balances the future development impacts with the goals of "No Net Loss of Shoreline Ecological Function ". The City could accomplish this balance in two ways. It could require applicants to submit and implement shoreline restoration plans commensurate with the level of proposed impact. Alternately, it could collect revenues through property taxes on new development or through shoreline substantial development permits and use this money to fund shoreline restoration projects and project monitoring within the City. Protecting Shoreline Resources and Ecology The ecological relationship of shoreline resources, including wildlife, fisheries, invertebrates, and amphibians, all receive benefits from mature & diverse shrub and forest habitats within the riparian zone. Avian resources also depend on diverse shrub and prairie habitats. Therefore, protection, conservation, and restoration of these habitats are the easiest way to benefit multiple shoreline resources and protect the existing ecological conditions within the City. Special emphasis is recommended on the protection of existing trees and the addition of new trees to forest areas along southern shoreline south of pool habitats to provide thermoregulation. Additionally, the fence below the Sullivan Road Bridge on the north side of the river provides a wildlife migration barrier that may force wildlife up onto the road. Alteration of the fence to allow wildlife passage is recommended. Enhancements aimed at benefitting fish, beyond increased riparian functions (shade, benthic macroinvertebrate production) would require greater effort, particularly with regard to permitting and design. It is recommended that the City work with WDFW and Trout unlimited to secure funding for fisheries enhancement opportunities within the City. Opportunities include enhancement and protection of the unique aquifer interchange area between SR -1 and SR -2. The reemergence of cold groundwater makes this area a likely cold water refuge for fish, particularly during the summer. Additionally, the existing stormwater treatment facilities in SR -2 provide an opportunity for improved habitat diversity and shading. Such improvements would provide native vegetation cover for small wildlife and improved bird habitat. Increase Public Access to Publicly -Owned Shorelines and Increase Recreational Opportunities for the Public Access to the southern shoreline throughout the city is abundant via the Centennial Trail. However, input gathered thus far indicates that additional parking and access to the shoreline from adjacent city streets is desirable at various locations. This includes improved access at Barker Road Bridge. This location provides a logical spot for non - motorized watercraft users to park and access the river. It is also a good bicycle entry point. Additionally, formal access to the river from Eden Road would improve public access. Park land located south of the Kaiser aluminum plant and west of the railroad bridge is a popular destination for hikers. The area contains trails through a mature pine forest with a diverse herbaceous shoreline plant community. Large boulders along the shoreline make the area attractive to rock jumpers. Access to this area is currently gained from Sullivan Park, which is approximately a half mile to the east. For this reason it appears that the public occasionally trespasses through an unimproved dirt road located west of the railroad. This area is, therefore, a logical location for improving public access. The old water treatment facility may provide parking. This access improvement is dependent upon land availability. URS 68 City of Spokane Valley Shoreline Master Program Update February 19, 2010 Inventory and Characterization Report (TECHNICAL REVIEW DRAM In addition to creating a wildlife migration barrier, the fence below the Sullivan Road Bridge on the north side of the river provides a barrier to hikers using the otherwise contiguous parklands along the shoreline. Alteration of the fence to allow pedestrian passage is recommended. Also, public input includes requests to improve the dirt road located northeast of the Sullivan Road Bridge to allow access to the river for drift boats. Lastly, the park land/beach area just west of Mirabeau Point is another popular recreation destination. Users can currently access the area via the undeveloped portions of Coyote Rock. However, as the area is developed, access will become limited. This area provides a logical take out location for watercrafts as most users end their runs at this location. It is recommended that the City work with WSPRC to provide access for the take out of non - motorized watercrafts and associated public parking at this location. Provide for any other element as defused in RCW 90.58.100 deemed appropriate or necessary Other elements described in RCW 90.58.100 include support for, and appropriate placement of, shoreline- dependent economies and the protection of single family residences against shoreline erosion. Due to the presence of dams, freight mobility and other shoreline dependent industry factors are not applicable within the City. Therefore, there are very few "shoreline dependent" uses that apply to the Spokane River with the City, other than river recreation. Gravel mining is one of the largest industrial land uses in the City, however, it is not shoreline dependent. It is recommended that future gravel mining be restricted to areas outside of the Spokane River's shoreline zone. Residential structures within the City are located above the floodway and are currently protected against erosive flood events by the dams, which damper flood energy. Shoreline erosion was noted in areas where concentrated stormwater runoff occurred or where off -trail foot traffic resulted in bare soil. Neither is currently posing a threat to upslope residential structures. Native shoreline vegetation establishment/restoration efforts located below residential properties will reduce the risk of erosion. 6.4,2 Shelley Lake Shelley Lake is expected to remain a private area, thus goals of the SMP related to public access are not applicable. However, goals related to protection of the shoreline ecological functions are applicable. These present the greatest management challenge because there is no public land around Shelley Lake that the City can target for affecting ecosystem enhancements, yet additional development is anticipated around the lake that will add intensified shoreline use pressure. One property remains along the eastern boundary of the lake that includes functioning riparian and wetland habitats and a unique granite outcropping. These natural areas account for much of the wildlife diversity observed at the lake. It is recommended that this area be conserved formally, either through shoreline designation or a conservation easement. It is recommended that the open space associated wetlands around Saltese Creek near the lake inlet be brought under the SMP and zoned for conservation. Where possible, the City should support enhancements to this area. Such enhancements may include native plantings, hydraulic modifications to store more water, and/or placement of habitat features (woody debris piles). As a purely residential environment, it will be important to provide policies in the SMP that allow for utility maintenance and other ongoing activities within the shoreline zone. Restrictions that disallow normal, ongoing maintenance activities will either be ignored or will provide bureaucratic difficulty for residents and City staff. The Saltese Flats Wetland Restoration Investigation has the potential to affect Shelley Lake. The draft report for restoration of Saltese Flats indicates that potential benefits of wetland restoration include improved flow conditions in Saltese Creek and summer lake levels in Shelley Lake. Restoring Saltese Flats to a seasonal, shallow lake /wetlands system is an option that has been of interest to several state and City of Spokane Valley Shoreline Master Program Update February 19, 2010 Inventory and Characterization Report - E1CAL REVIEW DRAFT local agencies. The flats have the potential to provide seasonal storage, which would improve summer base flow support. They also have the potential to provide open space and attenuate winter flood water. Water releases later in the summer will help increase the hydroperiod in wetlands associated with Saltese Creek, which will enhance water quality functions in those wetlands. 6,4.3 Gravel Pits If the Park Road Pit does become a public natural open space feature, it is recommended that the existing facilities be converted to public uses or removed and revegetated. The narrow upland banks should then be upgraded with a walking trail, safety improvements (guard rail), and viewing platforms. Habitat improvements should focus on avian support. An abundance of amphibians or terrestrial wildlife may be problematic beyond the confines of the pit due to high intensity vehicular traffic; it may result in frequent road kill. The Sullivan Road Pit is not expected to discontinue operations throughout the foreseeable planning period. ORS 70 City of Spokane Valley Shoreline Master Program Update February 19, 2010 Inventory and Characterization Report _ frECIVICAL REVIEW DWI" 7.0 LIST OF PREPARERS City of Spokane Planning Staff Scott Kuhta Project Lead Greg McCormick Planner Lori Barlow Planner Mike Basinger Planner Micki Harnois Planner Dan Neyman GIS URS Corporation John Patrouch, P.E. Project Manager Noah Herlocker, PWS Ecologist Jacqui Halvorson Environmental Planner — QA /QC Jake Dial, P.E. Civil Engineer aim Kolva Associates Planning Technical Advisor Mike Folsom Professor of Geology, Soils, and Wetlands — Eastern Washington University Shoreline Technical Advisory Committee Doug Pineo Washington State Department of Ecology Rob Lindsey Spokane County Water Resources Dave Harsh Washington State Department of Natural Resources Spokane Tribe Dave Lamb Coeur d'Alene Tribe of Indians Walt Edelen Spokane County Conservation District Mike Stone Parks and Recreation — City of Spokane Valley Karin Divens Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Robin Bekkedahl Relicensing Specialist — Avista Corporation Chris Guidotti Washington State Parks and Recreation — Riverside State Park UAW 71 City of Spokane Valley Shoreline Master Program Update February 19, 2010 Inventory and Characterization Report mamma REVIEW AFT' 8.0 BIBLIOGRAPHY Avista Corporation, 2005. Spokane River Hydroelectric Project FERC No. 2545, Applicant - Prepared Preliminary Draft Environmental Assessment. Spokane, Washington Box, S.E., and Wallis, J.C., 2002. Surficial Geology along the Spokane River, Washington and its Relationship to the Metal Content of Sediment (Idaho - Washington Stateline to Latah Creek Confluence. U.S. Department of Interior, U.S. Geological Survey. Gearhart, C.M., 2001. The Hydraulic Connection between the Spokane River and the Spokane Aquifer: Gaining and Losing Reaches of the Spokane River from State Line, Idaho, to Spokane, Washington. Eastern Washington University, Cheney, Washington. Kahle, S.C. and Bartolino, J.R., 2007. Hydrogeologic Framework and Water Budget of the Spokane Valley - Rathdrum Prairie Aquifer, Spokane County, Washington, and Bonner and Kootenai Counties, Idaho. U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2007 -5041. (provided information on the regional geology and current status of aquifer hydrogeology). Louis Berger Group, 2004. Recreation Facility Inventory and User Surveys Report, Spokane River Project, No. 2545. Bellevue, Washington. Northwest Power and Conservation Council, 2004. Intermountain Sub -basin Plan, Columbia River Basin Fish and Wildlife Program. Portland, Oregon. Parametrix, 2004. Spokane River Hydroelectric Project, Wetland and Riparian Habitat Mapping and Assessment. Kirkland, Washington. Parametrix, 2003. Spokane River Hydroelectric Project, Sensitive, Threatened, and Endangered Plant Survey. Kirkland, Washington. PBS &J, January 2009. Existing Data Review, Saltese Flats Wetland Restoration Investigation PBS &J, October 2009. Data Update and On -Site Feasibility Report, Saltese Flats Wetland Restoration Investigation (provided background information of Shelley Lake, water balance for Saltese and Shelley lake system, and proposed plans for wetland restoration). Ramm. 1994. Shelley Lake Environmental Impact Statement Thurow, Russell F.; Bruce E. Rieman; Danny C. Lee; Philip J. Howell; and Raymon D. Perkinson. 2007. Redband Trout: Resilience and Challenge in a Changing Landscape. Oregon Chapter, American Fisheries Society. 19 p. USDA, Soil Conservation Service, 1968. Soil Survey Spokane County Washington. URS 72 City of Spokane Valley Shoreline Master Program Update February 19, 2010 Inventory and Characterization Report rtE 1=INICAL REVIEW AFT) GLOSSARY 1. 100-year flood. The terms "10 year ", "50 year ", "100 year ", and "500 year" floods are used to describe the estimated probability of a flood event happening in any given year. Their primary use is for determining flood insurance rates in flood hazard areas. A 10 year flood has a 10 percent probability of occurring in any given year, a 50 year event a 2 percent probability, a 100 year event a one percent probability, and a 500 year event a 0.2 percent probability. 2. Aquifer Recharge Areas. Geological formations where rainwater or seepage actually enters an aquifer to replenish or recharge it. Aquifers typically consist of gravel, sand, sandstone, or fractured rock. In recharge areas, water is able to move from the surface down into the aquifer to replenish groundwater supplies, but contaminants may also enter the aquifer at the surface level. 3. $auk Armoring. Protective covering, such as rocks, vegetation, or engineering materials used to protect stream banks, or fill or cut slopes from flowing water. Stream bank and channel armoring is done to prevent erosion of channel banks and bottoms during runoff events. In some hydrologic systems stream banks are a major source of sediment. 4. Rio- infiltration (208) swales combine grasses and soils to remove stormwater pollutants by percolation into the ground. Their pollutant removal mechanisms include filtration, soil adsorption, and uptake by vegetated root zones. 5. Biro - stabilization. Biological shore protection techniques comprised of living and/or organic materials, such as native grasses and sedges; live stakes and posts; jute netting; and coir fiber rolls and mats. 6. Channel Aggradation. The accumulation of sediment in rivers and nearby landforms, which occurs when sediment supply exceeds the ability of a river to transport the sediment. The increase in sediment is caused by a decrease in soil binding that results from plant growth being suppressed. 7. Chauneliaation. The process of reconstructing the natural course of a stream in order to make it flow into a restricted path. 8. Combined Sewer Overflows (CSOs) and stormwater point discharges. Combined sewers convey both sanitary and stormwater flows. 9. Conservation Areas. Conservation areas define areas of undeveloped land primarily left in its natural condition. These areas may be used for passive recreational purposes, to create secluded areas, or as buffers in urban areas. 10. Critical Areas. The Washington Growth Management Act (GMA) requires cities and counties to designate and protect the functions and values of critical areas, and these are defined as: 1) Wetlands; 2) Areas with a critical recharging effect on aquifers for potable water (CARAs); 3) Frequently flooded areas; 4) Geologically hazardous areas, and 5) Fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas. Recent changes to GMA further require that cities and counties use "best available science" (BAS) when designating and protecting these critical areas. 11. Cumulative impacts. Prospective impacts from a proposed action that may be indirectly or directly related to the action and, when taken together, may constitute or result in short-term or long -term impacts. 12. Ecological Condition Ratings. Ratings reflect the current structural diversity, density, and continuity of native plant communities. Riparian vegetative communities trap sediments and nutrients from surface runoff and provide a matrix of root systems that serve as effective filters, minimize streambank erosion and flooding damage, assist streamflow maintenance, and moderate temperatures. 13. Ecological Function Assessment. For each of the inventory reaches in this document describes the eight processes and functions identified in the SMA as summarized in Section 3.2. 14. Footprint (building). The shape and orientation of the ground floor of a structure on the lot. 15. Frequently Flooded Areas. These areas of special flood hazard have been identified by the Federal Insurance Administration in the Flood Insurance Rate Maps. 73 City of Spokane Valley Shoreline Master Program Update February 19, 2010 Inventory and Characterization Report TECHNICAL, I VIIEW ' DRAFT 16. Geologically hazardous areas. Geologically hazardous areas include both erosion and landslide hazard areas. 17. Geomorphic processes. Induced by the hydrology create the in- stream structure that aquatic species have adapted to. Pools, riffles, glides, cover, and off - channel refugia are created through the movement of water at various flows. Each of these habitat elements together provides the complexity in a stream system that is necessary for the various species and life stages of aquatic organisms. 18. Habitat Fragmentation. The separation or breakup of a habitat area into smaller sections or habitat blocks by activities, such as development, logging, and agriculture, often resulting in degraded habitat due to blocked migration corridors and decreased access to water and feeding areas. It can also create isolated populations of wildlife and a decrease in their genetic diversity. 19. Habitat. The sum total of all the environmental factors of a specific place that is occupied by an organism, population, or a community. 1) High species diversity; 2. High vulnerability to habitat alteration; 3) High wildlife density; 4) Important movement corridors; 5) Important wildlife breeding habitat; 6) Important wildlife seasonal ranges; 7) Limited availability. 20. Hydrologic functions (shoreline). Include the transport of water and sediment across the natural range of flow variability; attenuating flow energy; developing pools, riffles, gravel bars, and the recruitment and transport of large woody debris and other organic material. 21. Hyporheic. Within a shoreline this zone provides the following functions: removing excessive nutrients and toxic compounds; water storage; support of vegetation and invertebrates; sediment storage; and maintenance of base flows. The subsurface habitat, or hyporheic zone, is the interstitial habitat beneath the streambed that is the interface between surface water and the adjoining groundwater. Vertical and lateral dimensions of subsurface water movements are controlled by geologic structure, such as the relative permeability of underlying strata. 22. Invasive Plant Species. Invasive plants can alter and disrupt natural habitats and reduce biodiversity. They are most threatening in ecosystems such as wetlands and fire prone areas. Invasive plant species thrive where the continuity of a natural ecosystem is breached and are abundant on disturbed sites like construction areas and road cuts. 23. Large Woody Debris. (LWD). Large woody debris including tree boles, root wads, and large branches, has been recognized as an important structural component of stream systems for both stream stabilization and habitat restoration. 24. Lucustrine. The environment of a lake. 25. Meander. A bend in a river, also known as an oxbow loop. A stream or river flowing through a wide valley will tend to form a meandering stream course as it alternatively erodes and deposits sediments along its course. The result is a snaking pattern as the stream meanders back and forth across its floodplain. When a meander gets cut off from the main stream body, an oxbow lake is formed 26. Native Aquatic and Shoreline - Dependent Wildlife Habitat. The shoreline provides habitat for a variety of species. Habitat functions may include but are not limited to: space or conditions for reproduction; resting, hiding and migration; and food production and delivery. 27. Native Plant Community. The collective product of individual plants indigenous to a particular locale responding to shared habitats. 28. Neotropical birds. Account for 340 of the 600 species of birds that breed and nest in North America. These birds migrate each fall to wanner climates in tropical regions of Mexico, Central America, South America, and the Caribbean. 29. No Net Loss. Ecological functions recognize that any ecological system is composed of a variety of interacting physical, chemical and biological components, that are interdependent in varying degrees and scales, and that produce the landscape and habitats as they exist at any time." When more development is proposed than can be reasonably expected to have impacts not anticipated and mitigated by the regulations of the SMP, the resources that may be affected must be identified and mitigated sufficiently to assure no net loss of shoreline ecological functions. 74 City of Spokane Valley Shoreline 19 , 2010 Master Program Update Inventory and Characterization Report [TECHNICAL REVIEW AFT] 30. Ordinary High Water Mark. The OHWM is a line usually identified by examining the bed and banks of the water along the shore to determine where action of the water has created a distinct mark upon the soil with respect to upland vegetation 31. Palustrine. Palustrine systems include any inland wetland which lacks flowing water. 32. PCB's. A group of man-made chemicals historically used as insulating fluids or coolants and lubricants in transformers, capacitors and other electrical equipment. They have also been used in hydraulic oils, fluorescent lights, inks, carbonless paper and other uses. Manufacture of PCBs stopped in the U.S. in 1977 (Ecology 2005). 33. Priority Habitats. Are habitat areas determined by WDFW to have unique or significant value to many species and that meet one or more of the following criteria: 34. Properly Functioning Condition (PFC). Represents the physical ability of a reach to withstand a 25 -30 year hydrological event. Properly functioning reaches have characteristics such as: well established riparian vegetation; an active floodplain; and stable channels. Sites considered to be properly functioning may not provide other important ecological or biological values and functions. 35. R each. An expanse, or widening, of a stream or river channel. This commonly occurs after the river or stream is dammed. A reach is similar to an arm. 36. Ri parian function. The interaction of various hydrologic, geomorphic, and biotic processes across a range of spatial and temporal scales within the riparian environment. As a result, riparian function encompasses a variety of processes that determine the character of the riparian zone and exert influence on the adjacent aquatic and terrestrial environment. The flow of sediment, water, wood, and energy into and out of the riparian zone is controlled by climatic, geologic, topographic, vegetative, and management - related factors. 37. Riparian Zone. The riparian zone provides important stream shading through canopy closure over the shoreline, habitat for invertebrates that provide forage for fish and wildlife, habitat for terrestrial species, surface water runoff filtering, and structural stability of stream banks. 38. Riverine. Associated with a river. 39. Scree slopes. Broken rock that appears at the bottom of crags, mountain cliffs or valley shoulders, forming scree slopes. The term scree is generally used interchangeably with talus, though scree often refers to rocks that are smaller than a volley ball). 40. Sessile aquatic species. Sitting on stem. 41. Shoreland. The area 200 -feet horizontally landward from the Ordinary High Water Mark (OHWM). 42. Shoreline vegetation. Both within the riparian zone and the adjacent upland areas, serves the following functions: maintaining temperature; removing excessive nutrients and toxic compound; sediment removal and stabilization; attenuation of flow energy; and providing large woody debris and other organic matter. 43. Shorelines of Statewide Significance. For rivers east of the Cascade Mountain Range crest, "those natural rivers or segments thereof where the mean annual flow is two hundred cubic feet per second (cfs) or more; or the portion of the rivers downstream from the first three hundred square miles of drainage area, whichever is less." 44. Shorelines of the State. Shorelines of streams or rivers having a mean annual flow of 20 cfs or greater. 45. Shorelines. Include all upland areas called shorelands', which is the area 200 -feet horizontally landward from the Ordinary High Water Mark (OHWM); floodway and contiguous floodplain areas; and all associated wetlands and river deltas (RCW 9.58.030(2)(f)). 46. Surficial Geology Study (USGS). Surficial geology is concerned with the description of the types and distributions of unconsolidated sediments across the landscape. This information is collected and maintained primarily in maps and databases. It is useful to hazard assessment, and land use planning. 47. Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL). The maximum amount of any number of a variety of pollutants that a waterbody can assimilate without violating state water quality standards. VMS 75 City of Spokane Valley Shoreline Master Program Update February 19, 2010 Inventory and Characterization Report TECHNICAL REVIEW DRAFT 48. Underground Storage Tank (UST). And Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST). About 640,000 underground storage tanks (USTs) nationwide store petroleum or hazardous substances that can harm the environment and human health if the USTs release their stored contents. Leaking USTs (LUSTs) can leave considerable clean-up problems. 49. Water Resource Inventory Area (WRIA). Ecology was given responsibility for the development and management of these administrative and planning of these watershed boundaries. 50. Watershed. A drainage basin or catchment, meaning the region of land whose water drains into a specified body of water. 51. Wetlands. Those areas that are inundated or saturated by surface or ground water at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions. Wetlands generally include swamps, marshes, bogs, and similar areas. City of Spokane Valley Shoreline Master Program Update February 19, 2010 Inventory and Characterization Report ITECIVICAL REVIEW ] Appendix A Data Inventory List City of Spokane Valley Shoreline Master Program Update February 19, 2010 Inventory and Characterization Report _CHN1CAL REVIEW AFT Appendix B Spokane River Inventory Data Tables City of Spokane Valley Shoreline Master Program Update February 19, 2010 Inventory and Characterization Report TECHNICAL REVIEW DRAFT Appendix C Vegetation Inventory ri City of Spokane Valley Shoreline Master Program Update February 19, 2010 Inventory and Characterization Report L I C171\1 AL REVIEW D1kAt'' '1 Appendix D Wildlife and Bird Information City of Spokane Valley Shoreline Master Program Update February 19, 2010 Inventory and Characterization Report 'TECHNICAL REVIEW AFT) Appendix E Map Portfolio City of Spokane Valley Shoreline Master Program Update February 19, 2010 Inventory and Characterization Report [TECHNICAL REVIEW DRAFT] • Appendix F Technical Review Group Comments 02/25/2010 _ -__---- : --- — -- - PICVS PM -,- I L21_ _ Numb* Divition Itiormwma City of Spokane Valley . „. . . . . 4 2, •• - PI t. • .. -4 ,•• :. • 0 . ' -0 ,-. ! - . i• es t ' -:•• ' • lf,' • ; '''' , -il i f; -- i . .-kfa 2.,,,3..„ ..,.; t ,-.•;.:: - , N ... ir , . . ,-,•:•,.' t - ' t Z- --- ... - e 4.= : -" k . ' -... . ' A ,,- ■,. c14......., '. - ,.. ' ,., . .l.;:;' .. : • _,,,,': -. _: - .7:, "rt - - i *" ^ 3 .!;&" ... ' ' • ' V ,-;:"'' ' ,..-- k - 4: 4 1 i -2- , :fi - ,.. v ,.' -,...- ' ' --,,,,...' .. . - : - ,Z; ''. -_-.?!:■.- -. '''' ;4 i i 1 --.- - - fi 1'. ''' ' ' -- ASTEZ.'- ,„.,,..... . . . _ :-...--- - .',PROGRAM UPDATE - ;-- :_,-__„ , :',; -- .-,.-. -,... , . . -- - ,„ . - • . —.,- ' - - •-rs - - , .. ING_ ...--' 7-7,..- . _ d " - :-7.; Z. , i. , ....," -- . ..„.....y ---. . 4- ..r"..." • ".....• - -4■4•• fit-, -,,-,..1----r-r--..•,: CITY C OIJNC IL /P1-/ ANN: .... ' •L_ - .4. , ,, t..1"..., =.- 5' , • - . --:•=r -.".----- --. - . . _ COMM.N._ SION;,. STUDY SESSION • - ---- ' - . - ..) -„, . - . - f . ::: , , ,,, 55: - „,: - ,; - __ - _____: - --..-_;,t i .fe-.--,-..,, : i.,4.-, , Ityli„. ,, z - -_,„.7,.... - 4.,..- 4 4 4 .. 4... ,11 T ..p.. .1 v,f,474t,724:7P4-4.7147.1.1"; .4.5.4L'.-- 94'..g.-.V.6 10 Y:,r,i.V-Li*-9...t '..., '" „.; )Af4'4=,■.'1.' W -"--, .e :,7 :” ‘ .' ' .1'.-...P.:.-7.A A 'S tfMil..* ' ''"•;''''':-_,- 12Vit.*:i4 '''',..„... i , ..y.* „V.,4*. =;=■+' ni ' '.. Lij 4g -' 7...:-%. ;'' ';':-. '''... 4 - .' ' . '+'-''' .;;T .'-r" • '-- Ve-t • '. ''". 2 '. ' ` '''. .,..''''-'-'-': ' - . -....;-: - . -- _&__ s 1 i — 1 01111MM/4 ___- .4M_IMMI/1/1 Mil I r ..' • '' Depafirsint or emminitty Davtiopffitnt ' fita,;;Nemis - - Pialmtut Divitio __ _ ._ _ _ - - ..• , . . . . Study Ses _ion Agenda t 4- 4.,,...- I.: V p :::,,,u .•,, < , • . -,:„ .....4.-,. 4 , - — - .-.-• - . .--A. . ' r: f f -.....fg -,, . , , , , " W-0 - - ret - .-;--- - - - - --i ' ..-h. ----- _ ,....„ - ez-.'‘ • -;.'s s-42- ri Barlow .. _ • SMA 101 - - 1)elit.- of Eco ogy •,„,,,-, . _ , _ _ , - Doug Pine, . _ - - - _ - -- - - -- - - • InventorYarid Analysis - IJRS ' - John Patrouche and Noah Herlocker . , . - • Ouestions and Feedback - - ,_--,.- , . - .,...... ,---;,- _ ...... . . . 1 02/25/2010 • sjo, " Dtpatttnot Corommiti$ Drorelopmat www.°"!!""r • PlantagPivitiort Bac *round • • aildgeffiqnV - Spokane County adopted SMP 2S-2. 2003 - Spokane Valley adopted County - - as Interi_trA - - • 2008 2 S1361Fai1e. Valley City CounciiiiiCludes 2009 update as Council • priority • 2009 -- SMP update process underway _ Dtpartmot of Dweloptitant Yin_nintiNvigion 7". Tasks Completed - 4 • 20091:!. lita of InV and Related doculii*A" 2 Develop (iIS Map Portfolio • Established a Page on City's Website • --- ,-_• Conducted 2,Open Houses (Nov. 2009 and Feb. 2010) 1)RAFT Shoreline Inventory/Characterization • Report Completed --- Feb 2010 - • Routed to TIZG for technical revieNv • 2 02/25/2010 ... )a}' 1'tdi a it P U 0 date Process - a ., Conduct Inventory ` • 59 • M Ancl , . f ' • < t t ' -v Develop Shoreline Addfess Deve►kQ, Epvit'ommnent Designat+ons, D Fatiw,e Irnpaas, Restcr Pollen i ` . - ev ,, tg , IF ' Revise Revise --4,-,.., m.: Goals and Policies Development Regulations _ . 1M _''-'_ _ ' =—_ _ —_ : r .r, Local Adoption, - � -- 011, ` - •. by i 7'�'Y' �, . StateAdoptipn l enrtniant �f f >,i>ui fail ®prnant • 1 Spdkane 1 ikl te . ,1 �afilitii Diviai ®n SMP Update Timelines i �!� ® .. iimmiiia■.s S � 1 :1 „.. :-. 1 :' , 1 ": . "'Z' !-.. 4 : 7 . 111 Ui -� ii 1 ., 7 - I -! ciiuuuiu••ni • 3 02/25/2010 r ; — Piaui DIVAN Ne t Steps t w r ,, �' a ` ij s` Finalize Dl at't ; 'r 4' Inventory and ° . Revise w/ TRG - Release for t- ?' / Characterization comments Public Comment , s; s Report . > ° , Pbinnin n"�; , E ' Public Hearing Recommendatiop eC ttlllllL53o f (Dates T&D) to City Council Review per;._ ' ! = -' ` , t -" -- .. _ c r.°` I'ubl axing Acce by ` y : I Ot1ClI Review ; ; a Resolution n Y� ` � a r, r, , cf D a b1tbtoit of Community DQv *i*pm t L � .ri1iM� - - - -- PiatnnittgPIvlsIon - -- Q or Information ,,. ..A. r -- - , - ti - . , re � a - - k 4-.r Scott Kuhta, AICP - Senior Planner (skwita@spo ` _ — Micki Harnois — Associate Planner (mhamoisaspokanevalleyoig` } — Lori Barlow AI CP — Associate Planner . " T (l barlo��@spokan alley.org) _. - Greg McCoiinick AICP — Planning Division .Manager (grncco ck @spokanevailey.ore) • City Web Page - www.sp 4 � Y �_. N T .� • . • } -f i �: C''''.---7. - i .. • r j a " f 1 . .�i } 5p(kane - • • r \' ''i'` c if 1 '4 ('ilp -c' -_ i f 7 •' 4*4 l Y � 3 L•. . -_ t; A .4 Y 14 Q.. � f T ,l y L � �' : 7 , ,ti-le �`'iu� r P: (•• — ltll Li d,�t 1 t , ., r'. t1.: .1. . . b .\.'tom . . "i. - J �. .: - -` _f : _ s L y l, ill:- ir' -'1 _ - e+ , +cl "�:`�.k' } c • ... tiG!t.!t,_.i .,. _. Tl ".,1 f , .L isi t _.o rY; .E' %: + ..:r r 7 ,-ev.4-...- -, - . - -: ts31 t L.: a ,,.. ,..-, f4 d'.4 ,*- 1 1r ra_ - ra 'mil r f !G ter , 4 ' !kit*. t , 4 1 r { . .'.. A ,' 1:::...„ , 2 '.1. ^ OAiilli2 ; PLIF posts of slit ?l rY rte- ItUVc tit. u\r . • r �; . m " zv • M (. 3 "i.,lt CAL ' t 3212 j t _ 1} ; 1F_ it !_t .G'.i4' Y_, Slit "t_'Q' t , r z . `ri • .'i\ f,.ltif ' • ` s w as s } .":t 1 lv...3 11t1 ' t t?u Al', 1.. 7L tetT E.r(. it > I .. _ .:it 31 .C: Lt, l' 1 ,13 , ,c.tc < ,t, u : tai li4 .'. d) � • .. o - S ...t.�} � ELI: tiiiF { "t! ha 1 ■C i77 1S.r?1 a '11) U 1 r- tf*it.', ;T : ; lnC -11 :: 0 0 S. 1.: t. iii,: 7 ..1t i::c'S . ir:1 ‘N 4 ,.. +a tt' o 11.,,,. 0,1t.,-._ L4t1Wf:•Ctt '11n.1.7C., ... -.e. e.i'te; ' 410_10..`._ 4$ _0413+ihs '. q • ' = ^ • Sp '1 da y' \?alle�t `i;C+i, „,,,e ! '.:-��1.'.i r- :yam u't ate �. r 2 ...n,w" -"^' Sicgnlfic:arilt, Rt' " . ur c tai Rt'v it•��Fr' 4 ' yo-Jr . - -1 1 . �'r _v'Z'}'.lf �_ �{,, t S.::: 1 t '. �..,t :; . , " 7E FJ (St= l t SttI( t t1 " \ >v ACV- c - R \N k'11 b7. W tt;t'( "_. tl.t. ?d P IA 0 ' ,tiI ,. %:. K ‘i. • 1 ti , 9 ( te: - _ . \\l_'{ 1V rNR f1 t_t 1...-I • ' ,.r Y ++- ' f t U 0 j (1 a., tS k f t .i �; l° (n? to l.2, 4 -' -' w. .. " . 1 il3 {t, il', ■'E?Ii()r\ t \S U i { i• 1 Data inventory C ,,,' ` includes about 50 documents & 130 GIS Laers _ " I 1ity .1)( t .,.i 1 [f - .. Et(_',' It to 1 { C.; Pli_ci .-3l' U!yU ti' SE.j. 2 El__r,R1v101.- = 011t.' Viii N t. - l..iitd 1,1%.4 Y ` d'� _4 ' .fie ' .a x � kt ?fltl ,i • ,f i� t �1'... i7t111t�t' {l1 4'.t iit� 4r -t� r t i, !1 . tic+, It Ni11cnt-, t.3.' :. (Jot Arlo-) ! -- lil,t -lf :: : tic':C1: f ,,c'fl ;tt l ,„,, i ` c Irrrr,iA.,,,,t fl,,r, 0 s - = � - w.. 1.3ilt 1:,1(1,.9{ .Ift.l{ illttti ittd{ at 5 c?::: point .s - . :. - f: - N: )tuei1 Environr� otlt � N 11 tow Cerl ltf", VC.gt. ?.salt' ' Ea it t x . • Fret lit. ati t =st -:rt' t�,vildtilt; r 1i1:.ltinn t:a rridol% I. - Vi e; t.ali: of dives sctk' llill(t'3tt,, c''tVilc) 1n rlt,3t stf'c':”- . 14..,47 t: ratty fisttcr)" (Ec•?1'.1hu - \ti' ; CClI- 12.1nt.; t!< ?Irt) !ti ii1 i}c.or coo-!. ;iClQ` t 1 'iaal,i ;t: tal'. ALE cant.amin: tian, ,: z ` , ,: Aquifer inter t tr 9e. r f r ( .- '3 horefine r'1aster Program Update 3 r SEtcIk:_n�^ River tic qr ie 1 _ La - tc 1t} Ltt}: Llrk t ^ 0 _ FlclL_�a Rt.lall � v. q p/ 9 Saz �+. -C. Lr <„ Y M r C ! y �l,y t A l =6 ,: .. // ,X . ?c s ,,,,,./ t•t ,, y } r J r x� c�3 • } � C t F .f.. "`� �-r �` � . � lrs- 1 !' 4-10- - i 1� _ mo ? W, y � . • , t Aito "" a, 1 � ' 1 3 .- f 1 ,. t om . ' Y ' ft . - � 1�. .t �5 �''�`{ �'�:,� _ k o- � �•, -� Cam.+., - i '',. Olft,- ; ' 1.7 :..3'-'-':::11.1r-ivIrrtftlfik: '-i' l:k i L: - ,,- - - , 04, ,:,47 - ..re,_:_,.‘,:u Apt SFp�tk:trtt kil•uc'-t` SSogittc`�tt 1 1".1`:1.01 _ C ity Lino to Ro. d • . . :;, :. c ` a c1, •' 1, ,,, .-trAlb1 f - ': r _ 6 p ti.r� <. I .iret,�yi� hi , h y.laGitia h.atitE =t - . •` : RE ■?3PE.i.El , ' 1. r.ati':1 kr ao.;,t.;ort. : .r _ .. 1 * >n Fit- e:: is c01 .its i.: �, L C ,F• c, : ^(t!,:•,.,.,• ot n ‘ : ; - \. '' fist Sit }k4 ern i1 � r. I. ° C. 1 . C Est I. C.. C tit.d (',,,, i• r ,:otli g , • 4.'i 11 91;',11 V P11C.'. .o,..: r.n - at Sir-4c. and E iota; Ri 's.. Stiokane L. 1 ; �i ��,.� \dE More.','ti}.0 `1 =_ r: l;Ei 1. l.•o ACC 4 Sttc�k:irtt' Rrv Solqri c.i t "1, E �,tc'r rt City Laic_ to Flora Road d E oto iii al Matt _a irc[it t + +k_tc= t eimc_.P4"C, tmotr C'Xt ° 1 - � '‘.2..' t' w Ia' G'c r. `r R r • t • " t t1t'` k. c i ci ' • ' . ; , c` ' 1 - � �-- t , 1r, c - . : i — . !, _ -.+. .. *tiZ5tl `\A . ,1t u-c ?o ::C.: ,t'. A p 1{U. ca (r'at.E_t1{.i'1 Ch r t , 'Ct.r.. _'..;,C . + - . ` Q�'1'0.r." - r ter ; i { " r ;c , t . . ` . . r2' ` ^‘;:,,t„1 , '• r ... V .. h- '1 . f.AC ^ 4. _ _. t- ,i, , }C rit +E ♦ \i rt. : , ... ,_,_• L.. ,,, c Spekar R. +l.: Spokane: R S t'grttr'rtt 2 - h=lor i Ro,id to 1 rc_nt ,1vt hr Itii.10 .'S. '-' C 4 ^^r 7'9 17. ^1 I' 57r 'Si[n.a ` /1 • . � ry ..“ - r Ag a °:a Js. k j ,, , -gym .� , - � _ fi r „ ax ' r { � ' F,4 �` _ f 4ffi1rY; r:r ut ,,' a\, } r i t F - 11:74J - .. , / , .:..."...-—.. - ; t 4 e 1 ' `t i �.. t r t . �.� Spokarre�' - Nralle's _ • 5 _Sc'( rtiOtit Flar'a h�i ac1 to .1 (•fit_ Avc.. E1r ici(l(• 111i1_1 acv of li o e`.a:10, • • y = ,, r._c�� . <. ' i.‘ a;,ii d ,„C •:ls L.~w2 (CT '1C:.2 i i o. N sc({� ,.l 11,4.1i11t !'sc 1 .i'Ci • •;•‘.•-••••-, !lL! • . • _ t"'� t . 1� ��_ c_�v�s�. �:3fg4 J :1c�ri:_,l�:sa: Lot. ` 1 ,,r•t:� .. • SP,Okart.0 Fl(lr 1 R0.10 tci Tr AV(' 1311,(19e. 4 � Ni iilai4c t11r.(fi I. aUc iil�s?sr..311.'. 01110.041 t 5f';c -Oa4 ita? v .� . l'.11 tvf10 CINSt ,i 7'; .11'0 1 .10 RR i?i lcri;c` -+ h FyF o-er .5,111A 11? it4e a e� -c: =j is 1 flf E{c } t� iat : - l:1 .i cs=`.t11tc,t 1 [ 1i \Cll E (' �l�Stlfltc t11 ;71,rrc'ci1` 0;1 -.?:d i1 ? R E !t? . i 'Z :i41 .1 ;c C t +ih[P - • 6 tc_nc:.(n4 uitalLs; •.zfy=;. lC 4(U_�` 1 a Spin e ` r ■ .� li r�alle� P','c C�nr ! ipdr:e 6 ti[l uric' Riv. or So,cgrt1t'.rtt 3 1 I c' tit _ A' c• Elf i i.' i. ' t c' L'\ - cl t t' R O I: E< !N; .f i Y Sys,, { -� � , ` yam F •� • � � tfi '1 i � �"�;. 7 : � ? " � {� . <i' - J � 's S . .,,. a• t ,5 ' ..�.{ . ty. , , }..- s ; r' . x t4i J�'c Vi ---•••••' -.- ,' . -".tW o '•= 2- '•1-V - VA ' '". .:'‘ 4 -;: . ;.:• , 1.' 7" / ''''::-: ' ''')1--. -.; -' ' . 1:.- - ..- ... ',(--' ' % - .. - - ';',$ig', • 6 V � i 1 - / �' '� 1. 15' - . • Spok `- - l okant R5vcr -- Si't;n 'rit . • Tr-oltt Avc` Ehi rdgi to pct \cote Rocks . 3.,:i �.11Fic *+ 1.6141 1•.i :14. C *t or-;tic.r tail { _ c i Y d er 7 r..`1 lo l cite t:Ion dilly ,1 0. :dotal '+ttoi c - ► ,gc ri i yi lV hSy rttc: E'cli6ct �:clrtc_ry tt.ia?t ��rc:ci anti r ,t c oyotc Rock-, L5 i ',,{iterif .[ s t ' .r ti: . Y q. •, Y . : � r j l c. rtte'r - . ttnt k i • s �nl i G l�`'',' Pot s . 0 l c' .EI ". r�3�� . r x � �s I 1 �`" �.z . = ' YES' : E�`at,u4 It Erwiroriniont ,1.' F1/4I11Ctei pitc(1l.r'!; clitic Clt.t.QEIVV c? r thmthorI : plus y ntt r7attit provides good cfiversity�. 1 . , ' a R ip�lrinn at 76 dative ven taboo. �},:. - �s-` c; Poor -talc' ecatc�ptcal cctid ; - CCD'. ' High vaki.c. bir €fe habitat ort steep stapes by .. ..y_ .T i `rent bridge. ; E CrOkc;t Vaii- v s 1 p Lei- 7 SE)akf It R vc_.-r .. St- t.grtle,rit .3 4. w - N `A „� T [ c`[tt AVE. E lS ic i��c' f ■ti l'El‘�7tc` Rock!. N. 7� t.. Wi_ 11:1.1 ,-It7rtt4_t•,,lt. --_, t:±i �. , r clC c $Ilc} !-1:.1 y;FcS: 1 h- c r t : t 1S'� 1 F ,- E 1 t cJ c t- „.. is -`, „_-t \ . M3•la ,c'14G11[.lf (` \;tl t lrt:4 �t...; ] .eA, ' 1 3, i J i _1 • ; -, L2. 'oc.2 t-ke ,h_ t _l ..i.,1?t...t ? ,ct e Nr.'t∎ t 4 ^Atc_t ;i :ns; ll1Gl4 .: . . 7,n-,t ,,,o r r t 4 \ i 1 .r `sue �: ll[ l ' L 11711. c l74 t f{t7 R7 c \_[c�tf F51_rot 13. a , . F • l t >_r t c'i ilct ! 4 ' � 'Yh 1A f1. � 4tr 1', h _ _ . ,1. .. . I' C.:' l.c_ , . ,le - a r h t r 1 'y- , 1s2 ° ''' C s, % 1 - $ +_C�.D,,At1' C d i if L Su�?.1' 1 I . • 3 k liey .., rte;..... Silt. k.iiit' River S 'quieerlt4 '' 1) Lti di d Avc,nuc A c } oso ot • -t -•i-,, ° 4 It T # TT f a ' �� t♦ [ t:, . lk--- iii■ ' , "' - ' ''''.7.-: 414 .7 r 1 .* O ”' 4 x ".---k--,1.„.._ ■ e'1 to _ 1t; t y - ¢ to r { .1., - .� : ,. , I Spokar r . , LT poh..d'1e <<I1 , )ft ' 4ti ,,s" -vaRer _ h r', a: _:, lasi.er Prcgranl Update 8 Spo, c ttt - Rivet. - Soqui out 4 OH h Z1 rli fr\v Alit Arc'.# ' a a F1 Xf t S - 1 ' ,• : .7 (_;. tJ cs .i G i „err _,— = ; — .:i: ftti 16 tj..EEItE"410,t11crtt fT a.1c {c E(Ntic.; __ y :s.f.,sr. 2.c: alit.. V }i;l ∎17- ,?112, • ?1'c ^ -a 1 .:i' - a s g - .- y= - ': --- `4 ': i11 E.. t, ,L_ 1?3t,1 t ! 1,1,:j1 -1113 't 0.•'1 t " ii .t •. s J "-� t ttk Leaf [{ •'u i Iv , afi,- • Spokkitle River - $ 9rti nt; 4. Orct1Ird AWCnuc Aco s ij - a . - ..,:m.14, (11, El{ 7..ti441cl± G J. • .....L'p - s i' J ' .. t. l Ett T , : 3 d i ll CC' rt. c VI. ... Rb ,c.- a =— _ _ t.t t.;s.[I -,l 00.1t..!,0.- 1I L11 .\ E,t" �t) G ?(( ty'. ft?11L1'l 1131,t■ot, _ :_, t!..0.1 J'i L2,t hl`C,' ' $ . (-. kiti1tr E,c,\rllrt'T,Fits s':_a' n . .. ' 3ic . 1 l c. , ,c sti r1:a ., t - � L: � E. ct, - .,n ;ifl eii71∎N , t T.:,,i11 - 'i 'P.1 r t I -R [$ t4C t1i' i ': rt'C' `1 l.[ IlU 'scc'c,,. - - 1. NO 1 1 , ^ \\ xc ;,..010, t 1 I.IIt\ to (Tel l at$ r”) 1~ ;l 1 } oi . ,3- i �r t��� i \„-...1 � � t : `hc'i ,il lC1.. Master r': E'lgr r' Lpciate k -. 9 Stt�':tfc'�r L 11.40':,.- rp: . +tc+ t, e.:3„..„? :. r,ra c,,,,., ,, �.e'C'a3 t J l -a•1C .1 ',IN: ' 1 tl .' i F : , _ :ltlff 3t t -(t_vw ratio '.,t; . v_. . . ■.a '81 , .00.∎._`f! in) casl',lat' ..a1 2tl.i a.,1 ti_.iL Lv i.., ,. iii ';42■a - k. Al.. - i 1~4 '. .1. hjtRt . c_t itl 'S., \ t e, _ rF .st, ` . r s ". Tx 3lcllat fx c. sr r.r )i'.l itti .;. $:m .t`o,t, ttit� CIF.c2t{ ,: r. •.. ;rte._ r- ., li, C o:It tv a f G ti t. 0 it ot : vi f tt:isi ?.; li %,•-: fC '. . 1::. .'• • • a h, ,,,2\ fl•4 iz aC'itl;.0 t, 1 to:\ tit ?lT.i� - li .t tp'.';? ' • ' ewe' e� sPo— 1 , trolley. L.`;kt - :X = a� ..lsa r f � � r +: d3 . �• �' t� r s ' � �'b� t x � �� '�2 `tea q ( l0, _ ' j I k4 �t r ' w,s; . • i� f � , r . F �ti r r c L ` ` ` t, i N el, t 5 ' � h � . r, - 4yy L'-'$ it . . - kl� 0 i ' selra on r - } rte emae n H � «.. r h .. 4 • . .rHyn Yvxw ,•.rx .,. r �? -.• . j • - BAABomdery _ r: 10 r , 4.. t• r [ats 3 • 'A a% trt - tij' 1 .3.:7.-•.S , 72V.1■A•11,5 ' -‘s• • •••..• •: .! a to • 3 PkiliKDAS341t441. ' , - :tat. Ls 1 I To i t 4 3 4- ■ - 6 Na: • AiL ‘2. . , - fe '41 Spokafflo v - 1 -g / it - ' - — (.3r.ivc•I Pits Z1 tittilivail Road.: t "tt_i tur %for-4 kl• • • ;;; 011111V[tt , t t c i; vu. wt . fl ‘,Ittt:10‘\ t, oottP0'.(s1 'ell 7. 4.4 104 • ISSLI•eN • - t.`t 10,10••,. A ciOteCtn, rote Fratt,:_ci pLbirc .1C C'eSS [11c1 . z • 'W- . ' . - • ;-- Lei r iL '11 • . ' i f _ C - _ g T ` k - -� i ' -}1p»! . _ _ • l +. Sp()kanc 12 Shoreline Master Program Update tj Inventory and Characterization ValleY' Summary Spokane River - Inventory overview of Spokane Valley • immediate shoreline generally protected from development. February 4, 2010 • 63% (201 acres) Parks /Open Space, 15% (47 acres) Residential, 22% (68 acres) Industrial /Commercial. Open House #2 • River Corridor gets lots of recreation use. Public access is generally excellent. • Narrow continuous vegetation zone — 65% native vegetation. • Provides an east -west wildlife migration corridor and riparian and upland habitat '� ` Common Management Issues • Conserve /protect/enhance existing forest and upland areas. • Control non - native landscaping and cutting in public lands. • Increased development densities. • Balance access and recreational use with habitat protection. • Management of State Park lands. Staff Contact Segment 1 Eastern City line to Flora Road Information: • 1.9 miles long, 88 acres of shoreland, characterized by single family residences. Scott Kuhta, AIC • 60% Parks /Open Space, 36% Residential. Res �o • Continuous band of ponderosa pine /serviceberry provides high quality habitat (71% native). Micki Harnois • • SCCD rates segment as in fair ecological condition with high quality areas. Associate Plane • End of losing river reach — lowest summer flows on river. Lon Barlow '_ :. Segment 2 - Flora Road to Trent Avenue .Bridge A. ssociate Plann I y CP %y I ,: • 3.7 miles long, 178 acres of shoreland, characterized by commercial and industrial uses. regMcCormick AICF • 70% Parks /Open Space, 17% Heavy Industrial. ,; \ • Heavily used for recreation (CT, Sullivan Hole kayak spot, boating). • Sullivan Road, BNSF RR and UP RR bridges cross river. • Continuous band of ponderosa pine /serviceberry, large fields provides good - habitat for wildlife. Unique western juniper community. (57% native). • SCCD rates segment as in fair -good ecological condition with high quality (509)921 -1000 — Main Line areas. • Gaining river reach — aquifer discharge, provides important cold water refuge for fisheries. Spokane River — Segment 3 -Trent Ave Bridge to Coyote Rocks • 1.8 miles long, 43 acres of shoreland, characterized by Myrtle Point Conservation Area and Coyote Rocks residential development. City jurisdiction on south shore. `.. ' • 60% Parks/Open Space, 40% Mixed Use • Ponderosa pine / hawthorne, cottonwood /hawthorne plus cliff habitat (outside ~ '��- city limits) provides good habitat diversity. Riparian area 76% native, upland area 17% native. • SCCD rates segment as in poor -fair ecological condition, high quality areas. • High value bird /wildlife habitat on steep slopes by Trent Bridge. Spokane River ® Segment 4 - orchard Avenue Area • 0.5 miles long, 12 acres of shoreland, entirely single family residential. • Public Access — none. • Modified shoreline - bulkheads, landscaping and docks. • SCCD rates segment as in poor -fair ecological condition 4 • Within Upriver Dam pool, high value wintering waterfowl area Shelley Lake • Contains 29 acres of shoreland, entirely single family residential, common area around lake. Shelley Lake is named for • Public Access — none. John Francis Shelley who • Natural lake, steep gravelly shoreline modified by development. homesteaded the area in • Granite outcrop on east bank, associated wetland, and Saltese Creek 1881. The lake is a provide good habitat and connectivity to the east. discharge point for surface • A good wintering waterfowl area. later from the Saltese Flats .0 Lake levels vary seasonally about 17 feet, water quality generally drainage basin. poor. • Shelley Lake is the end of the Saltese Flats drainage system. • Protect the Steen Road Gravel Pit - provides overflow for the system. Gravel Pits — Park Road and Sullivan Road • Heavy Industrial, active surface mines, constructed • shorelines. • • Park Road Pit has mature trees and shrubs. • Sullivan Road close to Spokane River — habitat interaction. • Pits provide excellent wintering waterfowl habitat. • Reclamation plans for both include future conversion to wildlife /conservation areas. CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: March 2, 2010 City Manager Sign -off: Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ® information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Information: Proposed Amended 2010 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 35.77.010 PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Adopted 2010 -2015 Six Year TIP on June 16, 2009, Resolution #09 -009; BACKGROUND: Council adopted the 2010 -2015 TIP based upon information staff had at that time relative to available funds and how these funds could be utilized for transportation projects. Since the adoption of the 2010 -2015 TIP, staff submitted applications for a Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and an Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant (EECBG) for the following projects that were selected for funding: o 2009 ADA Improvements — (CDBG) • Sprague Avenue ITS — ( EECBG) Additional proposed changes identified in the Amended 2010 TIP include the following: o Pines Corridor ITS Project was rescheduled from 2011 to 2010 to allow the design to begin later this year and position it better for bidding early in 2011. o The Pines /Mansfield, West Ponderosa Sewer Paveback, 44 Ave Pathway and Sprague Resurfacing #2 projects are carryovers from 2009. o The Sullivan Road (PE Only, Euclid to Wellesley) and Pavement Management Program - Local Access projects have been deleted from the 2010 TIP. The funding for the Sullivan Road project was transferred to the Pines - Mansfield Project to cover construction cost overruns. The Pavement Management Program for local access streets is currently unfunded. o The 2010 STEP Paveback projects (Corbin, Cronk, West Farms, and South Greenacres) have been added based on Council approval February 23, 2010. Based on this information, it is recommended that the 2010 TIP be amended to reflect the deletion of the projects that did not receive funding, include those projects that were not completed in 2009 and have been carried over to the 2010 construction year, and those projects added to the 2010 construction year. Attached is a summary of the proposed changes. A public hearing on these changes to the 2010 TIP is currently scheduled for March 23, 2010. Adoption of the Amended 2010 TIP is currently scheduled for March 30, 2010. There are sufficient capital project funds to cover these 2010 costs. OPTIONS: Info Only RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Info Only BUDGET /FINANCIAL IMPACTS: The 2010 budget will be amended to reflect changes associated with this proposed Amended 2010 TIP. STAFF CONTACT: Steve Worley, Senior Capital Projects Engineer Neil Kersten, Public Works Director; ATTACHMENTS: Draft Amended 2010 TIP City of Spokane Valley Department of Public Works Adopted 2010 Transportation Improvement Program Primary City Total 2010 oroj. # Project F To Source Amount Project Costs 0003 Barker Road Bridge @ Spokane River BR $ 55,000 $ 407,000 0088 Broadway Ave Reconstruction 180 ft. E of Moore Flora UAP $ 68,000 $ 2,465,000 3 0069 Park Road Project 2 (PE Only) Broadway Indiana STP(U) $ 34,000 $ 246,000 4 0063 Broadway Ave Safety Project Pines (SR 27) Park UAP $ 167,000 $ 834,000 5 0112 Indiana Ave. Extension elo Sullivan Flora UCP $ 264,000 $ 1,874,000 6 0060 Argonne Road Corridor Improvements 1 -90 Trent CMAQ $ 77,000 $ 576,000 7 0114 Broadway /Sullivan Intersection PCC STA $ 253,000 $ 1,230,000 8 0113 Indiana /Sullivan Intersection PCC STA $ 275,000 $ 1,342,000 9 Pavement Management Program - Arterials Various locations City $ 2,000,000 $ 4,000,000 10 Pavement Management Program - Local Access Various locations City $ 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000 11 STEP Paveback Various locations City $ 3,543,000 $ 3,543,000 12 0070 Sullivan Road (PE Only) Euclid Wellesley STP(U) $ 40,000 $ 298,000 13 0065 Sullivan /Sprague Intersection PCC STP(U) $ 933,000 $ 1,678,000 $ 9,709,000 $ 20,493,000 Funded Projects City of Spokane Valley Department of Public Works DRAFT Amended 2010 Transportation Improvement Program Resolution 10 - ? ? ?, March 30, 2010 Primary City Total 2010 Proj. # Project From To Source Amount Project Costs 1 0003 Barker Road Bridge @ Spokane River BR $ 402,000 $ 2,968,000 2 0005 Pines /Mansfield Montgomery Pines (SR -27) TPP $ 775,000 $ 775,000 3 0088 Broadway Ave Reconstruction 180 ft. E of Moore Flora UAP $ 68,000 $ 1,817,000 4 0069 Park Road Project 2 (PE Only) Broadway Indiana STP(U) $ 33,200 $ 246,000 0063 Broadway Ave Safety Project Pines (SR 27) Park UAP $ 186,300 $ 931,400 0112 Indiana Ave. Extension 3600 -ft e/o Sullivan Flora TIB $ 264,000 $ 1,874,000 7 0060 Argonne Road Corridor Improvements 1 -90 Trent CMAQ $ 85,500 $ 633,500 8 0114 Broadway /Sullivan Intersection PCC STA $ 248,000 $ 1,207,000 9 0113 Indiana /Sullivan Intersection PCC STA $ 21,000 $ 101,000 10 Pavement Management Program - Arterials Various locations City $ 250,000 $ 250,000 11 STEP Paveback Various locations City 12 0106 W. Ponderosa II City $ 38,000 $ 38,000 13 0130 Corbin ($330,000 CDBG Grant Anticipated) City /CDBG $ 345,000 $ 675,000 14 0131 Cronk City $ 295,000 $ 295,000 15 0129 South Greenacres City $ 405,000 $ 405,000 16 0128 West Farms City $ 440,000 $ 440,000 17 Misc. Paveback City $ 300,000 $ 300,000 18 0065 Sullivan /Sprague Intersection PCC STP(U) $ 464,300 $ 1,209,400 19 0061 Pines ITS Trent Sprague CMAQ $ 32,400 $ 239,900 20 0054 44th Ave Pathway Sands Woodruff STP(E) $ - $ 275,000 21 0127 2009 ADA Improvements Various locations CDBG $ 20,100 $ 100,700 22 0133 Sprague ITS University Sullivan EECBG $ - $ 400,000 23 0115 Sprague Resurfacing #2 Evergreen Sullivan Federal $ 10,000 $ 1,954,000 $ 4,682,800 $ 17,134,900 * The Pavement Management Program - Arterials will be completed as staff and funding levels allow. Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, and are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions. Funded Projects Added Projects 2009 Carry Over Projects P: \Clerk\AgendaPackets for Web \agendapacket 03 -02 -10 \Item 2 Draft Amended 2010 TIP.xls 02/25/2010 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: March 2, 2010 City Manager Sign -off: Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ® information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Information: FY11 Federal Earmark Appropriation Requests — Barker Road /BNSF Grade Separation Project GOVERNING LEGISLATION: PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Informational Memo to Council on Bridging the Valley Priorities, February 27, 2008; Adopted 2010 -2015 Six Year TIP on June 16, 2009, Resolution #09 -009. BACKGROUND: The Bridging the Valley (BTV) program is an on -going effort coordinated by SRTC to combine the BNSF and Union Pacific rail corridors from Athol, ID to Spokane, WA and close or grade separate all of the existing at -grade railroad crossings along the corridor. The BTV program includes 20 grade separation projects of which 4 are located within the City of Spokane Valley. These include Park Road at Trent, Pines Road (SR 27) at Trent, Barker Road at Trent and major improvements to Sullivan Road at Trent Ave. The 30% preliminary design phase was completed in 2004 with a FHWA grant from the SAFETEA federal transportation bill. The Council previously prioritized these BTV projects and determined that the Barker Road Grade Separation project to be the highest priority. The City recently had the opportunity to submit an FY2011 Appropriations Earmark request to Sen. Patty Murray, Sen. Maria Cantwell, and Rep. Cathy McMorris- Rogers to complete the Design and ROW acquisition phase of the Barker Road Grade Separation Project. The earmark would fund approximately 80% of the Design and ROW cost. BNSF would provide 5% of the total project cost for all of the BTV grade separation projects. Additional funds for the Design and ROW phase would come from a FY10 SAFETEA -LU Earmark received by SRTC. The City would not have to provide any matching funds for the design and ROW phase of this project if fully funded. Funding for the Construction Phase is anticipated to be 80% federal appropriation, 5% BNSF match, and the remaining funding provided by a to -be- determined mix of State, WSDOT and City Funds. Attached are copies of the federal Earmark appropriation application. OPTIONS: Info Only RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Info Only BUDGET /FINANCIAL IMPACTS: The City is not expected to have a match for the Design and ROW phase of the project. STAFF CONTACT: Steve Worley, Senior Capital Projects Engineer Neil Kersten, Public Works Director; ATTACHMENTS: Murray, Cantwell, and McMorris- Rogers Earmark Appropriation applications; Letters of support for project U.S. Senator Patty Murray FY2011 Transportation and Housing Appropriations Request Form The following form must be completed and turned in by Friday, February 19, 2010, along with any additional information. No requests submitted after February 19, 2010 will be considered. If you are requesting EDI funds, an additional form for EDI projects will also need to be filled out (document attached). Please complete all applicable sections of this form and email to: appropriations @murray.senate.gov. Please note: Cell phone numbers must be included when you are providing contact information. Please note: This form in its entirety could be made public. If you have questions please feel free to contact Senator Murray's office at (202) 224 -2621. • If you are making a request within any other jurisdiction (not Defense or THUD), you will need to fill out the general form. • Requests for transit vehicle procurement for hybrid vehicles or vehicles utilizing at least 20- percent renewable fuels will receive priority consideration. To Submit This Form: 1. E -mail this form along with any attachments to Travis Lumpkin at travis lumokin @murray.senate.gov and the appropriate Regional Outreach Director; AND 2. E -mail this form along with any attachments to appropriations @murray.senate.gov. You may return a hard copy, but you must send an e -mail copy. NOTE: Please indicate the Appropriations Subcommittee, recipient, and project title in your email subject line, e.g., "FY11 Transportation — HUD Appropriations /City /Project Name." If the project vendor has more than one appropriations request, please submit separate emails and include the project name after the vendor name in the subject line. Date: February 16 , 2010 Project Information Name of project (brief but descriptive title): Barker Road /BNSFGrade Separation Project Sponsor or Recipient (city, county, organization name): City of Spokane Valley, WA WA point of contact: (name, address, business and cell phone, e -mail) Glenn Miles Spokane Regional Transportation Council 221 W First Avenue, Suite 310 Spokane, WA 99201 Office: 509- 343 -6370 Cell: 509- 994 -6173 srtransportationgsrtc. org OR Neil Kersten Public Works Director City of Spokane Valley 11707 E Sprague Avenue, Suite 106 Spokane Valley, WA 99206 509- 720 -5000 nkerstenc spokanevalley.org Head of your organization: (mayor, executive, president, CEO, etc., include contact information) Mr. Tom Towey Mayor City of Spokane Valley 11707 E. Sprague Avenue Spokane Valley, WA 99206, Suite 106 509- 921 -1000 tto weyno spokane valley. org DC point of contact: (name, address, business and cell phone, e - mail) Tim Peckinpaugh, Preston - Gates, (202) 628 -1700 1735 New York Ave NW Washington D.C. 20006 77MP@klgates.com com Location of project: (address & city, and COUNTY) Intersection of Barker Road & SR290 (Trent Ave.) Region in Washington State benefited (list counties and cities): Pacific Northwest Shippers, Statewide, Spokane County: City of Spokane Valley, City of Liberty Lake When was project initiated? 2003 Federal agency your request is for: Federal Highway Administration / Federal Railroad Administration Directorate, program or account: SAFETEA -LU, 20154 Capital Grants for Rail Line Relocation Projects Federal Highway Administration, Freight Mobility and Safety Federal Railroad Administration. Rail Safety General description of project: The proposed project will construct a grade separated intersection of Barker Road at SR290 and the BNSF Railroad lines. The project will construct an overpass with bridges crossing the BNSF railroad tracks and SR290. There will be diamond pattern on and off ramps from SR290 (Trent Ave) that connect to Barker Road and the overpass. Wellesley Ave will be rerouted to connect direct /y to Barker Road south of the grade separation. The proposed project eliminates the at grade crossing of Barker Road and the BNSF Railroad tracks. It provides properly designed high speed on /off ramp connections to 5R290 from Barker Road to reduce or eliminate traffic congestion. It provides adequate infrastructure to serve the commercial /industrial developments adjacent to Barker Road. This project is part of the larger Bridging the Valley project. Bridging the Valley (BTV) is a series of projects that will separate vehicle traffic from train traffic in the 42 mile corridor between Spokane, Washington and Athol, Idaho. The separation of railroad and roadway grades in this corridor —which currently includes 75 railroad /roadway crossings —will promote future economic growth, traffic mobility, traffic safety, and train whistle noise abatement. The Bridging the Valley project also envisions the relocation of Union Pacific Rail Yard from the area adjacent to the Spokane County Fair and Expo Center at Havana and Sprague Avenue to the area adjacent to Barker and Trent. BTV will create new opportunities for economic development and redevelopment at both locations. Why is project needed? The BNSF railroad corridor Is a primary east -west rail line between Seattle, WA and Chicago, IL. Approximately 50 trains per day pass the rail crossing at Barker Road. Barker Road serves an area of the City that has been experiencing strong growth since it holds some of the last large tracts of undeveloped land within the City l /mits. Traffic on Barker Road is projected to dramatically increase as the area is fully developed. The intersection at Barker Road and SR290 (Trent Ave.) already experiences congestion from the existing developments that has resulted in a Level of Service (LOS) of 'F: The failing LOS has led to restrictions on new development along Barker Road in the vicinity of the intersection. The high train volumes Intersecting Barker Road at the at -grade crossing pose an Increasing safety risk. As the surrounding area grows, the risk of train - vehicle collisions will rapidly increase. While these types of accidents are relatively rare, they have a very high risk of fatalities. The project is necessary to resolve critical traffic safety issues that pose a high risk of train - motorist accidents. It addresses a failing traffic intersection as required by Law, and it opens up hundreds of acres of land for commercial /industrial development that will strengthen the economic vitality of the City and create /retain jobs. It will also greatly improve the efficiency of freight movement through the region. SPECIFIC activities to be funded with requested appropriation: (Use up to 250 words to describe specific activities to be funded by request. This question is aimed at understanding the reason for your request.) The requested appropriation will fund the remainder of the design phase and the right -of -way acquisition for the project. The 30% preliminary design of the project was completed with a previous appropriation under SAFETEA. The tasks to be completed include, but are not limited to the following: 100% Design Plans, Specifications and Cost Estimates including Contract Documents for Bidding Drainage Design Traffic Plan Design Utility Plan Design, (relocation of water, sewer, power, and telecom lines) Geotechnical Studies and Design Pavement and Road Design Bridge Structural Design Right -of -Way negotiation and acquisition Description of project benefits: Economic Impact (Briefly describe the economic impact of this effort. For many requests the economic impact can be expressed in terms of the total number of jobs created and /or maintained directly and indirectly. For these, please list the type of jobs and where those jobs are located. Other requests will yield economic impacts other than job creation or maintenance. For these, please provide specific and supported estimates of economic impact.): The proposed project will promote economic development on two fronts. First, construction of the project will create or retain approximately 600 jobs for a duration of two years. These include jobs directly employed by contractors and indirectly employed through material suppliers, related services and engineering /management of the project. This is based upon an approximate rate of 10 jobs created or retained for every $1,000,000 in total project cost. Second, the project opens up over 200 acres of property for commercial and industrial development by eliminating restrictions on development. The area surrounding Barker road includes some of the last large tracts of easily developable land within the City Limits. There is already some light industrial development in the area, and the easy access to 5R290, SR27, 1 -90 and both BNSF and Union Pacific Railroad lines provides ideal transportation infrastructure to support continued industrial and commercial development Development of this area is vital to the long -term economic growth, viability, and sustainabillty of the City and the region. Safety: Describe specific safety enhancements associated with this project. Please include statistics. The proposed project eliminates an at grade railroad crossing and at -grade intersection of Barker Road and a high -speed state highway (SR290). Federal Railroad Admin/stration records show 23 railroad crossing related accidents in Spokane County from 2000 -2009 including 4 fatalities. This is a fatality rate of more than 1 for every 6 accidents, The most recent crossing accident at Barker Road was a fatality in 1991. FRA records calculate the probability of an accident at the Barker /BNSF grade crossing as approximately 1 in 34 for any given year. The project will also construct a diamond pattern interchange with on and off ramps for the intersection with SR290 (Trent Ave.) SR290 is a 4 -lane, 50 mph, state highway at Barker Road. The line of site is limited to the west of the intersection due to a crest •n the highway road. The proposed improvements will eliminate the risk of a train - vehicle collision and vehicle-vehicle collisions. Congestion Relief: Describe specific mobility enhancements associated with this project. Please include statistics. The existing intersection has a Level of Service of 'F: High train volumes, (approx. 50 per day) that are up to 7,700 feet in length, have an affect on the flow of traffic at the intersection. Trains speeds vary based on direction for entry or exit from the BNSF Hauser Refueling depot. When passing each other, these trains create walls of rail cars extending up to 3 miles in length. This creates 5362 hours of vehicle delay annually (2003) and forecast to increase to 11,994 vehicle hours of delay by 2030 without this project. This is lust due to delay caused by trains. Additional delay is created by the existing poor geometrics and sight distance. Barker Road northbound traffic has difficulty accessing SR290 due to high State highway speeds and high traffic volumes. SR290 also has a limited westerly field of vision, preventing the ability to see appropriate gaps in oncoming traffic. The proposed project would eliminate the train - vehicle conflicts and delays from the at grade railroad crossing and provide appropriate high -speed on and off ramps for traffic to enter and exit SR290 from Barker Road. These improvements would improve the Level of Service(LOS) for Barker Road /SR290(Trent Ave) intersection from 'F' to A : The realignment of Wellesley eliminates additional congestion on SR 290 by consolidating access points for Barker and Wellesley to one appropriately designed interchange Freight Movement: Describe specific freight mobility enhancements associated with this project. Please include statistics. The proposed project will further enhance development of the proposed Union Pacific rail loading facility adjacent to the project site, thereby encouraging the use and promotion of Intermodal and trans - loading opportunities for area shippers and manufacturers It also promotes improved freight movement through Spokane County /Kootenai County by eliminating vehicle - train conflicts. Barker Road provides one of the more direct accesses to Interstate 90 from the east Sullivan Industrial Park facilities. Barker Road is a heavily used truck route for freight coming from Canada and north Idaho. Trucks use Barker Road to access 1 -90 westbound to avoid the congestion on Highway 95 through Coeur d'Alene, Id. Environmental Protecto®n: Describe specific environmental benefits associated with this project. Please include statistics. The proposed project will reduce congestion from a LOS of 'F' to a LOS of'A . Based upon elimination of 5362 vehicle hours of delay annually, this will reduce carbon monoxide and other green house gas emissions (NOx and VOCs) generated from idling vehicles by approximately 864 lbs. per year. The project will incorporate sustainable development techniques to the extent that is feasible. Sustainable practices will include emerging more environmentally friendly stormwater treatment and disposal methods such as Low impact Development Practices to reduce the stormwater runoff and treat the remaining the stormwater before disposal. The project will also incorporate LED technology to reduce lighting costs for the interchange. As a trans - continental rail corridor, BNSF transports a wide variety of hazardous and toxic chemicals and mater /als through the area. At grade crossings create risk of exposure to these chemicals and materials to the traveling public and the community whether it /s into the air or into the Spokane - Rathdrum Prairie Sole Source Aquifer. This project permanently stops the risk of exposure at this location by eliminating the potential for rail- vehicle conflicts List all partners working on the project /program: The following agencies are committed to participating in the development and /or funding of this project: Spokane Regional Transportation Council BNSF Railway Washington State Department of Transportation Kootenai Metropolitan Planning Organization Does the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) support the project (Y /N)? Yes If yes, please include letter of support from WSDOT. Letter is attached Is the project included in the State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP)? Yes Has the project been endorsed by a Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) or Regional Transportation Planning Organization (RTPO)? Yes Is the project included in a Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Program Plan (MTIP)? Yes Current status of project (i.e. alternatives analysis, environmental impact, design, construction, etc.): 30% Preliminary Design has been completed SEPA /NEPA Environmental Review Completed with a Documented Categorical Exclusion Is the project broken into phases? Yes Current phase this funding is for: Design and Right -of -Way Acquisition Expected completion date of phase: September 2012 Expected completion date of project: 2015 Total estimated cost of the project: $65,000,000 for all phases of Barker Road BNSF Grade Separation. Does the funding requested complete the project? (Y /N) No If No, what is the remaining need? And how are you getting that funding? Does the project assume a future appropriation request(s)? Approximately $61 million will be required for the construction of the proposed project. BNSF has committed to a 5% match for the project. The Spokane Regional Transportation Council, WSDOT, and City of Spokane Valley are committed to applying for State and local funding sources that provide competitive grant programs in order to secure the required local match for future federal appropriations requests. Those applications will be timed with the completion of the Final Design and land acquisition process, to ensure timely delivery after award of the funds. FY 2011 Request (DOLLAR AMOUNT): $3,650,000 Is the project authorized? (Has the project been previously authorized to receive an appropriation by a committee ?) (Y /N) N The larger Bridging the Valley Program of rail relocation projects, of which the Barker Road /BNSF Grade Separation Project is a part of, has been authorized in SAFETEA and SAFETEA -LU, and received funding through both transportation authorization and appropriation bills. If authorized, cite the authorization bill and section: N/A Amount included in President's FY2011 Budget Proposal: $0 Detailed breakdown of funding secured to date: (federal, state, county, city, private, etc.) Source Amount Activity Funded BNSF (Private) $230,000 (5 %) Design & ROW FY10 SAFETEA -LU Earmark (Federal) $719,921 (15.7%) Design & ROW Spokane Valley (City) pending Design & ROW WSDOT (State) Pending Design & ROW FY2010 Appropriations Request: (if applicable) N/A FY2010 Appropriated Amount: (if applicable) N/A • House passed report level: N/A • Senate passed report level: N/A •'r FY10 Consolidated Appropriations bill: N/A Provide detailed prior year(s) federal funding history: (include federal formula and congressionally directed funding as well as fiscal year, account, and amount) Barker Road Grade Separation is part of the Bridging the Valley program. BTV is a multi- agency, multi -state project to eliminate at -grade railroad crossings for the Union Pacific and BNSF rail line from Athol, ID to Spokane, WA. The following funding summary is for the entire BTV project that has been received to -date: 2008: $20.25 Million in Transportation Appropriation in FY08 Bill appropriated to account with no earmark for BTV. 2005: $1 million in Transportation Appropriation FY06 Bill (Study money appropriated in FY05 converted to construction use in FY06) $5.8 million in SAFETEA -LU ($5 Million in Idaho, $800,000 in Washington) 2004: $4,350,000 in FHWA STP funding apportioned to the Spokane TMA, with matching funds provided by local jurisdictions. 2002: $4,200,000 in FHWA STP funding apportioned to the Spokane TMA, with $800,000 in funding provided by the Idaho Transportation Board. 1999: $200,000 Planning Study Funds using Spokane's Allocation of CMAQ funding matched by Idaho Transportation Department. What percentage of total project funds is represented by federal dollars? 80% Are you submitting a language request? (A request for language to be inserted in a bill, report or both.) $3.65 million for final design and right of way for Barker Road Interchange as part of the Bridging the Valley rail corridor project Other members of Congress receiving this request: Sen. Maria Cantwell, D- Washington Rep. Cathy McMorris- Rodgers, R- Washington, District 5 Additional information or comments: Attachments: (if any) Letters of Support LD Jit Ste- f This section must be completed for ALL requests. The information you include in this section will help our office highlight your efforts in the media and will be used on our website. PLEASE NOTE: Appropriations requests and priorities often must be explained or justified to the public. As a result, information provided in this appropriation request form may be used or distributed by Senator Murray's office without prior notice. Please explain briefly why this project is a meritorious use of taxpayer dollars. The Barker Road Grade Separation Project provides an ideal opportunity to address safety concerns, create jobs, promote economic growth, reduce vehicle emissions and train whistle blowing, while protecting the regions sole source aquifer. It will support new opportunities for light industrial, commercial and residential development within the City of Spokane Valley. This development is critical to the City and Region's long term economic growth, vitality, and sustainability. Quote: (Please include a quote from the appropriate member of your organization about the importance of this project and identify that member by full name and title or position. This quote will be used in press releases that are generated by our office.) "This region recognizes the importance of safely and efficiently moving people and goods around the area and across the nation. This project, and others like it will ensure that interstate commerce provided by trucks and our railroad partners can safely traverse the region, while working together to grow and support our economy in a way that improves and protects our quality of life and the environment. "Glenn Miles, Transportation Manager, Spokane Regional Transportation Council Press Contact: (Please list the appropriate contact within your organization for press. Please include name, email and business and cell phone number.) Carolbelle Branch Public Information Officer City of Spokane Valley cbranch@spokanevalley.org (509)- 720 -5411 Website Posting: (Please fill out the following information describing your project. Please note that this will be made public.) Project Title: Barker Road /BNSF Grade Separation (Bridging the Valley Rai/ Corridor Project) Recipient: City of Spokane Valley Amount: $3,650,000 Location: City of Spokane Valley, City of Liberty Lake, and Spokane County, Washington Project Description: (One to two sentences describing the specific action items federal funding will pay for.) Provide for the Final Design and Right -of -Way acquisition phase to construct a grade separation and eliminate a Railroad at -grade crossing. Importance: (One to two sentences describing the importance of your project.) The proposed project eliminates important safety and potential environmental issues that arise from train /vehicle conflicts, and moves toward eliminating an existing obstacle to the long -term growth, economic development and sustainability of the City of Spokane Valley and the Inland Northwest. 1DZ TGA5. D o gi o • t o ** *ONLY FILL OUT IF YOU ARE REQUESTING EDI FUNDS * ** Member: Murray State: WA Project Name: equested Amount Questions Answers and Responses 1. Provide an overview description of project. N/A 2. Provide detailed description of the specific use of requested federal funds. 3. Please provide a detailed explanation of how the project would directly benefit the surrounding communities. Does the project benefit low or moderate - income neighborhoods? What is the average median income for households in the county? What is the economic impact to the local community? Does the project create jobs or provide job training? Does the project provide new affordable housing resources? Does the project provide education or counseling services? Other social services? Provide detailed information and any relevant statistics. 4. Will requested funding complete the project? What is the timeline of anticipated expenditure of requested funds? Provide detailed breakdown of funding secured to date (source, amount, and use of funding), 5. Is the project supported by the local community (city, county, elected officials, community organizations, private businesses, etc.)? 6. Has this project received federal funding in the past? Please provide fiscal year, amount and account. What percentage of total project funds is represented by federal dollars? 7. Please provide name and address of potential grantee. Please also include information for the main contact person for the project, including phone number. 8. Please provide any supplemental information that should be taken into consideration or you believe enhances the relative competitiveness of this project. The following activities are not eligible for EDI funds: (1) reimbursement of expenses (including debt service or retirements); (2) transportation /road projects; (3) expenses for program operations; (4) "first responder" projects; and (5) healthcare facilities. In addition, colleges and universities will not receive EDI funding except for special circumstances. ;Add ona , Information Re a u' e ® EDI ®ro : ati'on. Re a nests j Name of Project: This is the name of your project as it will appear in the appropriations bill /report. Please be descriptive. WA Point of Contact: This is the complete name, street address, business and cell phone numbers and e-mail address for your organization's contact located in Washington State. This is typically your business development director, CEO or president. DC Point of Contact: This is the complete name, street address, business and cell phone number and e-mail address for your organization's contact located in Washington, DC. This is typically your DC- area advocate. Program Description: Please provide an accurate, simply worded narrative of 250 words or less that describes the need for the project and the products or services it will provide. Use layman's terms and define all acronyms. Avoid the use of technical jargon. U.S. Senator Maria Cantwell FY2O11 Appropriations Request Form Project Title: Barker Road /BNSF Grade Separation Sponsor: City of Spokane Valley Dear Washingtonians, As your United States Senator, part of my job is to help critical priorities in our state receive attention from the federal government so we can reinvigorate our economy, create high - paying jobs, and help working families. During the annual budget process, I submit requests to the Senate Appropriations Committee for congressionally directed spending that benefits Washington State. Every year, I receive thousands of requests for assistance from cities, counties, water and utility districts, transportation agencies, and others. I carefully review these requests but am only able to submit a select few projects for the Appropriations Committee to consider for inclusion in their final bills. Please follow the instructions below carefully so my staff and I can consider your request. Sincerely, Instructions Please follow all instructions and fill out this form in its entirety — questions 1 - 41. Requests for the Transportation, Housing and Urban Development Subcommittee, the Defense Subcommittee, or within the EPA STAG account, must be sure to fill out questions 1 -41 as well as the corresponding additional section at the end of this document. Unfortunately, due to the volume of requests we receive, we cannot review applications that are incomplete or submitted after the deadline. If you have questions, contact Senator Cantwell's Appropriations Clerk Matthew Souza in our DC office at 202.224.3441. Deadline: This form must be completed and submitted electronically, along with any additional information, no later than February 19, 2010 11:59PM Pacific Time. How to submit: E -mail the completed form along with any supporting documents to appropriations @cantwell.senate.gov. Please indicate the Appropriations Subcommittee relevant to your request in your email subject line (Le. "Labor -HHS Appropriations Request"). What not to do: Applications mailed, dropped off or delivered in hard copy will NOT be accepted. Who to contact: The ultimate point of contact for all appropriations requests is Matthew Souza, but we suggest that you also contact one of the following individuals to discuss your project: Name County Responsibilities Phone Email Nate Caminos King (206)220 -6400 nate caminos @cantwell.senate.cov Mike English Clallam, Grays Harbor, Jefferson (253)572 -2281 mike english @cantwell.senate.gov Kitsap, Mason, Pierce, Thurston Sally Hintz Island, San Juan, Skagit, (425)303-0114 sally hintz @cantwell.senate.gov Snohomish, Whatcom Kimberly Pincheira Clark, Cowlitz, Lewis, Pacific, (360)696 -7838 kimberly pincheira@cantwell.senate.gov (Starts Jan. 22) Skamania, Wahkiakum David Benton, Chelan, Columbia, (509)946 -8106 david reeploeg @cantwell.senate.gov Reeploeg Douglas, Franklin, Grant, Kittitas, Klickitat, Yakima Marcus Adams, Asotin, Ferry, Garfield, (509)353 -2507 marcus riccelli @cantwell.senate.gov Riccelli Lincoln, Okanogan, Pend Oreille, Spokane, Stevens, Walla Walla, Whitman Project Information 1. Date of Request: February 19' 2010 2. Appropriations Bill (Agriculture, Commerce - Justice - Science, Defense, Energy - Water, Financial Services, Homeland Security, Interior - Environment, Labor -HHS- Education, Legislative Branch, Military Construction -VA, State - Foreign Operations, or Transportation- Housing and Urban Development): 3. Pease provide the priority ranking for this project if your organization is requesting more than one project. If this is your only request, please list "only ": Only 4. Washington State county or counties benefited: Spokane County 5. General Information Project Project Amount Federal Account, Other House Title Sponsor Requested Agency Directorate, or Senators Members (full figure, i.e. Program Requesting Requesting $150,000 NOT (if applicable also list From From $150k) the Activity name) Barker Road, City of $3,650,000 FHWA, FRA SAFETEA -LU, 20154 Sen Patty Rep. Cathy BNSF Grade Spokane Capital Grants for Murray, D- McMorris- Separation Valley, WA Rail Line Relocation Washington Rogers, R- Projects, Freight Washington, Mobility and Safety, District 5 Rail Safety 6. Project Sponsor Organization City of Spokane Valley, WA Name Address 11707 E Sprague Ave., Suite 106, Spokane Valley, WA 99206 County Spokane Phone Number 509 - 921 - 1000 Website www.spokanevalley.org 7. Project Recipient (if different than sponsor) Organization Same as Sponsor Name Address County Phone Number Website 8. Location of Project: Address Intersection of Barker Road & SR290 (Trent Ave.) City Spokane Valley County Spokane 9. Point person at your organization our staff may contact regarding this project Name Neil Kersten, Public Works Director Business Number 509 - 720 -5000 CeII Number Email Address nkersten @spokanevalley.org 10. Head of your organization (if different than your point person) Name Tom Towey, Mayor Business Number 509 - 921 -1000 CeII Number Email Address ttowey @spokanevalley.org 11. D.C. based point of contact, if applicable (typically your D.C. area advocate) Name Tim Peckinpaugh, Preston - Gates, Business Number (202) 628 -1700 CeII Number Email Address TIMP§k /gates.com 12. Clearly state what funding would do in one sentence (ivliaximum 150 characters) (e.g. For the design and construction of a pedestrian overpass in Spokane, WA; To implement a traumatic brain injury treatment program at Springfield Hospital.) For the Design and Right -of -Way acquisition of a railroad grade separation in Spokane Valley, WA 13. Problem /Issue Statement (Limit to no more than 200 words) (Describe the problem or issue to be addressed through this request. Be as detailed as possible, and explain why the problem or issue cannot be addressed without an appropriation.) The BNSF railroad corridor is a primary east -west rail line between Seattle, WA and Chicago, IL. Approximately 50 trains per day pass the rail crossing at Barker Road. Barker Road serves an area of the City that has been experiencing strong growth since it holds some of the last large tracts of undeveloped land within the City limits. Traffic on Barker Road is projected to dramatically increase as the area is fully developed. The intersection at Barker Road and 5R290 (Trent Ave.) already experiences congestion from the existing developments that has resulted in a Level of Service (LOS) of 'F: The failing LOS has led to restrictions on new development along Barker Road in the vicinity of the intersection. The high train volumes intersecting Barker Road at the at grade crossing pose an increasing safety risk. As the surrounding area grows, the risk of train - vehicle collisions will rapidly increase. While these types of accidents are relatively rare, they have a very high risk of fatalities. Addressing these issues will require significant improvements to eliminate or reduce the safety issues, address congestion and provide the necessary infrastructure to serve the surrounding developments. These costs are beyond the financial ability of the City. 14. Project Description (Limit to no more than 250 words) (Describe in detail the project, what it will do, and why it is necessary IN LAYMAN'S TERMS. This question is aimed at understanding the project and the reason for your request.) The proposed project will construct a grade separated intersection of Barker Road at SR290 and the BNSF Railroad lines and eliminates the existing at -grade crossing. The project will construct an overpass with bridges crossing the BNSF railroad tracks and SR290. It provides properly designed high speed on /off ramp connections to SR290 from Barker Road to reduce or eliminate traffic congestion. Wellesley Ave will be rerouted to connect directly to Barker Road south of the grade separation. It provides adequate infrastructure to serve the commercial/industrial developments adjacent to Barker Road. The project is necessary to resolve critical traffic safety issues that pose a high risk of train- motorist accidents. It addresses a failing traffic intersection as required by Law. It opens up over 200 acres of land for commercial /industrial development that will strengthen the economic vitality of the City and create /retain jobs. It will also greatly improve the efficiency of freight movement through the region. This project is part of Bridging the Valley (BTV) project, which is a series of projects that will separate vehicle traffic from train traffic in the 42 mile corridor between Spokane, Washington and Athol, Idaho. The BTV project also envisions the relocation of Union Pacific Rail Yard from the area adjacent to the Spokane County Fair and Expo Center at Havana and Sprague Avenues to the Barker and Trent area. BTV will create new opportunities for economic development and redevelopment at both locations 15. Project Goals and Results (Please describe measurable goals and expected results, and describe how the project will be evaluated and performance tracked): The goals and anticipated results of the proposed project are summarized as follows: The project wilI prevent train - motorist collisions that have a high risk of fatalities The restrictions on development will be removed from the adjacent land The LOS of the Barker Road /SR290 (Trent Ave.) intersection will improve from 'F'to 'A' The reduced congestion will result in a reduction of carbon monoxide and other greenhouse gas forming vehicle emissions (NOx and VOCs) by approximately 864 lbs. per year. The project will greatly improve freight movement through the region. 16. Project Benefits (Please provide specific and supported estimates) (If this is a Transportation or Economic Impact Initiative project, please answer this information on the corresponding form): a. Jobs Created or Maintained Directly or Indirectly (Please list the type of jobs and where those jobs are located) See Transportation Form b. Other Economic Impact (i.e. stimulates private investment in community, etc.) See Transportation Form c. Community Impact (expansion or improvement of social services, community facilities, health services, etc.) See Transportation Form d. Other Impacts (environmental, safety, or other impacts) See Transportation Form Funding Information 17. Dollar amount of FY 2011 request: $3,650,000 18. Total estimated cost of this project: $65,000,000 19. Is this project authorized? If yes, please note bill or law number and section: Not in Full. 30% Preliminary Design funding was provided in SAFETEA -LU FY04 20. Is this project in the President's FY 2011 Budget? (If applicable please list the agency, section, and amount. Note: The President's Budget may not be available before our deadline in which case we ask that you check back with us if you are included.): No 21. If you are requesting bill, report, or bill and report language, please designate which and list the request here: $3.65 million for final design and right of way for Barker Road Interchange as part of the Bridging the Valley rail corridor project 22. If this project was funded in an FY 2010 appropriations bill please list the exact title that was included in the bill: No 23. Previous federal appropriations for this project Appropriations Account Amount Amount Percentage Bill Requested Received of Total (full figure) (full figure) Project Cost FY10: FY09: FY08: FY07: FY06: Total:: 24. Other secured sources of federal funding for this project (grants, loans, loan guarantee, etc.) Federal Funding Name of Amount Percentage Agency Instrument Funding Received of Total (Grant, Program (full figure) Project Cost Loan, etc.) FY10: FHWA Grant SAFETEA - LU $719,921 15.7% FY09: FY08: FY07: FY06: Total: i g ` 25. State or local government, or private funding for this project: Name of Funding Name of Amount Percentage Funder Instrument Funding Received of Total (Grant, Program (full figure) Project Cost Loan, etc.) FY10: BNSF(private) Grant n/a $230,000 5% FY09: FY08: FY07: FY06: Total: Aseartvtf 111111111M3 26. Partners working on this project (if applicable. Note- you can press "tab" at the last cell if you need more rows.) Name Type of Contribution Contact at Telephone Email Address of Contribution Amount /Value Partner Number Partner (Financial, (if applicable) Organization In -Kind, Written Support) BNSF Financial 5% of project cost WSDOT Written Amount Pending Keith Metcalf 509 -324- metcalkna wsdot. wa. qo v Support, 6010 Financial SRTC Written Glenn Miles 509 -343- srtransnortationgsrtc.ora Support 6370 27. Current Status of this project: SEPA /NEPA Environmental Review Complete 30% Preliminary Design Complete 28. Phase this funding is for (e.g. planning, design, construction, implementation): Design and ROW Acquisition 29. Expected completion date of this phase and subsequent phases: Design and ROW Acquisition completed in September 2012 Construction 2015 30. Expected completion date of project: 2015 31. If there is a matching requirement, can you provide the required match, and is the match in hand? Yes. A 20% match is required for the earmark. The funding for the match is not secured. 32. If this requested appropriation is enacted, by approximately what date do you anticipate spending these funds? (Please include month and fiscal year) Design and ROW acquisition would be complete by September, FY12 33. Does the funding requested complete this project? (Y /N) No 34. If No, what are the expected future federal appropriations requests? An additional federal appropriation request is anticipated for FY13 for the Construction Phase of the project 3 .5. If No, what other sources of funding do you plan to pursue? The Spokane Regional Transportation Council, WSDOT, and City of Spokane Valley are committed to applying for State and local funding sources that provide competitive grant programs in order to secure the required local match for future federal appropriations requests. 35. Did this ro'ect receive funds from the rrierican Recovery and Reinvestment P J Act? If so, please list how much, how it was distributed (i.e. grant, contract, etc.), and through which agency and program. No. Public Disclosure Section Information included in this form may be used to help our office fully explain your efforts to Washingtonians on our website or in the media. Since January of 2009, the Senate Appropriations Committee has required each Senator to post information on their websites at the time appropriation requests are made in order to explain the purpose of their requests and why they are a valuable use of taxpayer funds. As a result information provided in this appropriation request form may be used or distributed by Senator Cantwell's office without prior notice. 37. Please clearly describe the most direct positive impacts this project will have on the surrounding community and state, as it could be stated to the general public. (No more than 250 words). If, for example, your project creates or retains family -wage jobs, improves local infrastructure or spurs economic growth, be sure to include which communities will be affected and how local quality of life will be improved. Please be sure to provide specifics about the people and areas that will be served by this project: The Barker Road BNSF Grade Separation Project provides an ideal opportunity to address safety concerns, create jobs, promote economic growth, reduce vehicle emissions and train whistle blowing, while protecting the regions sole source aquifer. It will support new opportunities for light industrial, commercial and residential development within the City of Spokane Valley, adjacent City of Liberty Lake, and Spokane County. This development is critical to the City and Region's long term economic growth, vitality, and sustainability. 38. Please summarize in one or two sentences why this project is a worthy use of taxpayer dollars: The proposed project resolves important safety issues, and eliminates an obstacle to promoting the long -term growth and economic development of the City of Spokane Valley. 39. Quote (Please include a quote from the appropriate member of your organization about the importance of this project and identify that person by full name and title or position.): This region recognizes the importance of safely and efficiently moving people and goods around the area and across the nation. This project, and others like it will ensure that interstate commerce provided by trucks and our railroad partners can safely traverse the region, while working together to grow and support our economy in a way that improves and protects our quality of life and the environment "Glenn Miles, Transportation Manager, Spokane Regional Transportation Council 40. Press Contact (Appropriate contact within your organization for our press office to contact. Please include, name, email address, and phone numbers, including a cell phone number): Carolbelle Branch Public Information Officer C/ty of Spokane Valley cbranchc spokanevalley. org (509)- 720 -5411 41. Website Posting: (Please fill out the following information describing your project. Please note that this will be made public.) Project Title: Barker Road /BNSF Grade Separation (Bridging the Valley Rail Corridor Project) Recipient: City of Spokane Valley Amount: $3,650,000 Location: (Including all cities and counties.) City of Spokane Valley in Spokane County, Washington Project Description: (One to two sentences describing the specific action items federal funding will pay for.) Provide for the Final Design and Right -of -Way acquisition phase to construct a grade separation and eliminate a Railroad at grade crossing. Importance: (One to two sentences describing the importance of your project.) The proposed project eliminates important safety and potential environmental issues that arise from train /vehicle conflicts, and moves toward eliminating an existing obstacle to the long -term growth, economic development and sustainability of the City of Spokane Valley and the Inland Northwest: Additional Information for STAG, Transportation, HIJD -EDI, and Defense Requests EPA State and Tiribal Assistance Grant (STAG) * * * *On /y fill out this section of if you are making an EPA STAG request**** A. State Related Information a. Is the proposed project eligible for a loan from its state Clean Water or Drinking Water State Revolving Fund? b. Have the potential grant recipients applied for an SRF loan? If so, what was the size of the SRF loan the state determined potential grant recipients could afford to repay? c. What priority ranking did the state assign to this project as the result of that application? (This is the ranking from the Water Quality Program (Water Quality Grants and Loans) from the Washington State Department of Ecology. No other ranking is applicable.) B. flow will the requested funds benefit low or moderate- income communities? C. Funding Usage a. What is the purpose of this project? (drinking water, wastewater, storm water, and /or water quality protection): b. Is the preliminary planning and engineering design completed for this project? c. When will this project be ready to proceed to construction? d. What is the total estimated cost of the project based on the facilities plan or preliminary engineering report? D. User Fees a. What is the estimated average annual user fee as a percent of the estimated median annual income of households that will be served by the project if the community constructs the proposed project without the requested grant funds? b. With an SRF loan? With municipal funding at market rates? E, Matching Funds a. What are the community's plans for providing the expected 45 percent match (keep in mind, the amount requested cannot exceed 55 percent of the total project amount)? b. Does the community have a financing plan certified by an authorized local official demonstrating how it will cover the 45 percent matching funds? F. Does the project serve a broad public purpose or it is intended for a more limited (or private) purpose that could more appropriately be funded by a private party or local financing? G. Does the project address an immediate need or it is predicated on future growth /development? Transportation Requests ****Only fill out this section of if you are making a Transportation reguest**** Description of project benefits A. Economic Impact: Describe the economic impact of this project in terms of the total number of jobs (new and maintained), and where those jobs are located. The proposed project will promote economic development on two fronts. First, construction of the project will create or retain approximately 600 jobs for a duration of two years. These include jobs directly employed by contractors and indirectly employed through material supp /iers, related services and engineering /management of the project. This is based upon an approximate rate of 10 jobs created for retained for every $1,000,000 in total project cost. Second, the project opens up over 200 acres of property for commercial and industrial development by eliminating restrictions on development. The area surrounding Barker road includes some of the last large tracts of easily developable land within the City Limits. There is already some light industrial development in the area, and the easy access to SR290, 5R27, 1-90 and both BNSF and Union Pacific Railroad lines provides ideal transportation infrastructure to support continued industrial and commercial development. Development of this area is vital to the long -term economic growth, viability, and sustainability of the City and the region. B. Safety: Describe safety enhancements associated with this project. Please include statistics. The proposed project eliminates an at grade railroad crossing and at -grade intersection of Barker Road and a high -speed state highway (5R290). Federal Railroad Administration records show 23 railroad crossing related accidents in Spokane County from 2000 -2009 including 4 fatalities. This is a fatality rate of more than 1 for every 6 accidents. The most recent crossing accident at Barker Road was a fatality in 1991. FRA records calculate the probability of an accident at the Barker /BNSF grade crossing as approximately 1 in 34 for any given year. The project will also construct a diamond pattern interchange with on and off ramps for the intersection with SR290 (Trent Ave.) SR290 is a 4 -lane, 50 mph, state highway at Barker Road. The line of site is limited to the west of the intersection due to a crest in the highway road. The proposed improvements will eliminate the risk of a train - vehicle colllslon. C. Congestion Relief: Describe mobility enhancements associated with this project. Please include statistics. The existing intersection has a Level of Service of 'F: High train volumes, (approx. 50 per day) that are up to 7,700 feet in length, have an effect on the flow of traffic at the Intersection. Trains speeds vary based on direction for entry or exit from the BNSF Hauser Refueling depot. When passing each other, these trains create walls of rail cars extending up to 3 miles in length. This creates 5362 hours of vehicle delay annually (2003) and forecast to increase to 11,994 vehicle hours of delay by 2030 without this project. This is just due to delay caused by trains. Additional delay is created by the existing poor geometrics and sight distance. Barker Road northbound traffic has difficulty accessing SR290 due to high State highway speeds and high traffic volumes. SR290 also has a limited westerly field of vision, preventing the ability to see appropriate gaps in oncoming traffic. The proposed project would eliminate the train - vehicle conflicts and delays from the at- grade railroad crossing and provide appropriate high -speed on and off ramps for traffic to enter and exit 5R290 from Barker Road. These improvements would improve the Level of Service(LOS) for Barker Road /SR290(Trent Ave) intersection from r to W. The realignment of Wellesley eliminates additional congestion on SR 290 by consolidating access points for Barker and Wellesley to one appropriately designed interchange D. Freight Movement: Describe freight mobility enhancements associated with this project. Please include statistics. The proposed project will further enhance development of the proposed Union Pacific rail loading facility adjacent to the project site, thereby encouraging the use and promotion of Intermodal and trans - loading opportunities for area shippers and manufacturers It also promotes improved freight movement through Spokane County /Kootenai County by eliminating vehicle-train conflicts. Barker Road provides one of the more direct accesses to Interstate 90 from the east Sullivan Industrial Park facilities. E. Environmental Protection: Describe environmental benefits associated with this project. Please include statistics. The proposed project will reduce congestion from a LOS of 'F' to a LOS of 'A'. Based upon elimination of 5362 vehicle hours of delay annually, this will reduce carbon monoxide and other green house gas emissions generated from idling vehicles by approximately 864 /bs per year. The project will incorporate sustainable development techniques to the extent that is feasible. Sustainable practices will include emerging more environmentally friendly stormwater treatment and disposal methods such as Low impact Development Practices to reduce the stormwater runoff and treat the remaining the stormwater before disposal. The project will also incorporate LED technology to reduce lighting costs for the interchange. As a trans - continental rail corridor, BNSF transports a wide variety of hazardous and toxic chemicals and materials through the area. At grade crossings create risk of exposure to these chemicals and materials to the traveling public and the community whether its into the air or into the Spokane - Rathdrum Prairie Sole Source Aquifer. This project permanently stops the risk of exposure at this location by eliminating the potential for rail - vehicle conflicts State Information F. Does the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) support the project (Y /N)? If yes, please include a letter of support from WSDOT. YES, Support letter is included G. Is the project included in the State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP)? YES Other Information H. Has the project been endorsed by a Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) or Regional Transportation Planning Organization (RTPO)? YES, the Spokane Regional Transportation Council supports the project I. Is the project included in a Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Program Plan (MTIP)? Yes J. Current status of project (alternatives analysis, environmental impact, design, construction, etc.): SEPA /NEPA Environmental complete 30% Preliminary Design is complete K. IF this is a Federal Aviation Administration Airport Improvement Project (FAA AIP), list the Airport Name (as defined in the FAA National Plan of Integrated Airport System (NPIAS)- no abbreviations please): N/A L. If this is a Federal Transit Administration (FTA) project, list the appropriate transit authority: N/A M. Have you confirmed either with the U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT) or a regional USDOT office that this project is eligible for funds provided under the requested account? Yes HUD - Economic Development Initiative * * * *On /y fill out this section of if you are making a HUD -EDI request * * ** Projects requested under the Economic Development Initiative (EDI) program should focus on the elimination of conditions that deteriorate neighborhood property and community facilities, health, safety, and public welfare. Additionally, projects should strive to conserve and expand suitable living for all persons, principally those of low to moderate income; expand and improve community services which are essential for sound community development of viable urban communities; provide for a more rational utilization of land and other natural resources; reduce the isolation of income groups within communities; restore and preserve properties of special historic, architectural, or esthetic value; and alleviate the physical and economic distress through stimulation of private investment and community revitalization. The following projects are not eligible for EDI fund: funding for for - profit entities; reimbursement of expenses (including debt service or retirement of debt); transportation projects; expenses for program operations; homeland security or first responder projects; healthcare facilities; or college or university projects (except in unique circumstances where such a project meets the goals of the EDI program). A. Please provide a detailed explanation of how the project would directly benefit the surrounding communities. Provide details and any relevant statistics when answering as many of the following questions as possible (No more than 150 words each): a. Does the project benefit low or moderate - income neighborhoods? b. What is the average median income for households in the county? c. What is the economic impact to the local community? d. Does the project create jobs or provide job training? e. Does the project provide new affordable housing resources? f. Does the project provide education or counseling services? Other social services? B. Is the project supported by the local community (city, county, elected officials, community organizations, private businesses, etc.)? Defense ****Only fill out this section of if you are making a Defense request * * ** A. Appropriations Account (Indicate with an "X" in the column directly to the right, or write in on the bottom line): Personnel O &M Procurement RDT &E DHP (specify below) Other or Extra Info B. Service (indicate with an "X" in the column directly to the right): Army Navy Marine Corps Air Force Defense -Wide Army Reserve Navy Reserve MC Reserve AF Reserve Army NG Air NG C. Line Number and Title: D. Program Element Number (if RDT &E): E. Government Program Manager (Please see additional information section at the end. Include name, agency, address, business and cell phone numbers, and email): F. National Security Impact (Please detail in no more than 250 words how this project will benefit our national security): Additional Information Government Program Manager: This is the person who will mostly likely serve as the "contracting officer technical representative" (COTR), the government employee you will most frequently interact with for the duration of your contract and will approve the expenditure of your earmark funds. Line Number and Title: This is the program line number (or "budget activity ") and title from the budget information prepared by the Department of Defense for the President's Budget. Documents containing this information are available at the web site for the Department of Defense Comptroller. This information may be viewed at http: / /www.dod.mil /comptroller /. Note that in some cases you may also need to include the number for a specific sub - account referred to as an "activity group" or "sub- activity group." This is often the case for requests funded under the operations and maintenance (O &M) accounts. Program Element Number: This is the Department of Defense "PE number," an alphanumeric designator used to categorize research, development, test and evaluation (RDT &E) programs. The report accompanying a defense appropriations bill or act will list the various program elements by title in a table. You may relate a title to a PE number by consulting the RDT &E budget information prepared by the Department of Defense for the President's Budget. Documents containing this information, which are referred to as "R -1's," may be viewed at http://www.dod.mil/comptroller/. A detailed description of the technical objectives and accomplishments for program elements is provided in the "descriptive summaries" (also referred to as "R -2's ") for that PE. A searchable database of descriptive summaries, as well as handy table for deciphering PE numbers, may be found at the following web page: http : / /www.dtic.mil /descriptivesum /. I FY2011 APPROPRIATIONS REQUEST FORM REPRESENTATIVE CATHY MCMORRIS RODGERS (WA -05) (ONE project /program per page) I. GENERAL INFORMATION Date of Request: February 19, 2010 Organization making request: City of Spokane Valley, WA Tax Code Status of Organization: Municipality Address: 11707 E Sprague Ave., Suite 106 City: Spokane Valley State: WA ZIP Code: 99206 Point of Contact(POC): Neil Kersten, Public Works Director, OR Glenn Miles, Spokane Regional Transportation Council Phone: Neil: 509- 720 -5000; Glenn 509 -343 -6370 Email: nkerstengspokaneva / /ey.org; srtransportation@srtc.org Address: Spokane Valley: 11707E Sprague Ave., Suite 106; SRTC: 221 W. First Ave. City: Spokane Valley; Spokane State: WA I ZIP Code: 99206; 99201 Head of Organization (if different from above): Mr. Tom Towey, Mayor DC Representation (if any): Tim Peckinpaugh, Preston - Gates, Phone: 102- 628 -1700 Email: timp@prestongates.com Address: 1735 New York Avenue NW, suite 500 City: Washington, D.C. State: ZIP Code: 20006 -5221 II. PROJECT /PROGRAM INFORMATION PROJECT TITLE: 1) Prioritized: _1_ of 1 requests for your organization 2) Appropriations Bill: (Please check) _Agriculture _Commerce/ Justice/ Science _Defense _Energy and Water Financial Services _Homeland Security _State/ Foreign Operations Interior and Environment Labor, HHS, ED _Military Construction/ VA _X_Transportation -HUD 3) Agency /Bureau (i.e. FBI; Corps of Engineers; US Navy; ARS, etc.): Federal Highway Administration /Federal Railroad Administration 4) Requested Account (i.e. Buildings and Facilities, Aviation Safety; Capital Improvements, etc): SAFETEA -LU, 20154 Capital Grants for Rail Line Relocation Projects, Freight Mobility and Safety, Rail Safety 5) Amount requested for FY2010: $3,650,000 6) Minimum amount of FY2010 funding needed to begin or sustain this project: $3,650,000 7) Is this program authorized? _X YES NO If YES, bill number: SAFETEA -LU Year:2005 8) Has this project been the subject of congressional hearings? No If YES, what committee(s): 9) Is this program funded in the President's budget request? _YES If YES, amount: $0 X NO 10) Anticipated total future requests: $61 million Over the next 5 years 11) Local, state and /or private funding sources: Washington State plus local jurisdictions, BNSF Total Amount: BNSF: $230,000(596); FY10 SAFETEA -LU Earmark: $719,921; Washington State: Pending; City of Spokane Valley: Pending Over the next 2 years 12) Other sources of Federal funding: SAFETEA -LU, FHWA STP funds Total Amount: $ Pending Over the next 5 years 1 13) Federal Agency Sponsor or Program Manager: Mr. George Schoener, Deputy Asst. Secretary for Transportation Policy and Mr. Mark Yachmetz, Associate Administrator for Rail Development, FRA Office: Schoener, Office of the Secretary; Yachmetz, Office of Railroad Development Phone Number: Schoener, 202 -366 -4067; Yachmetz, 202- 493 -6374 14) Senate advocate (if any): Senator Murray & Senator Cantwell Office: Murray, 173 Russell; Cantwell, 511 Dirksen Phone Number: Murray, 202 -224 -2621; Cantwell, 202 -224 -3441 15) Local Advocates (Organization, Business, Association that support request): Regional Chamber Alliance, which includes the chambers of commerce in Downtown Spokane, Spokane Valley, Post Fa//s Idaho and Coeur d'Alene Idaho. Also see attached letters of support. III. PROJECT FUNDING HISTORY (FROM CURRENT YEAR BACKWARD) FISCAL YEAR PRESIDENT'S REQUEST ORGANIZATION'S FUNDING AMOUNT APPROPRIATIONS ACCOUNT, REQUEST BILL SUBACCOUNT 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 $15 million $1 million FRA High Speed Rail $5.8 million SAFETEA -LU ? ?? Earlier $30 million $8.55 million FHWA STP Purpose of funding. Please include how you specifically plan on spending this funding, if awarded (If this is left blank your project will not be considered): The proposed project will construct a grade separated intersection of Barker Road at SR290 and the BNSF Railroad lines. The project will construct an overpass with bridges crossing the BNSF railroad tracks and 5R290. There will be diamond pattern on and off ramps from 5R290 (Trent Ave) that connect to Barker Road and the overpass. Wellesley Ave will be rerouted to connect directly to Barker Road south of the grade separation. The proposed project eliminates the at -grade crossing of Barker Road and the BNSF Railroad tracks. It provides properly designed high speed on /off ramp connections to SR290 from Barker Road to reduce or eliminate traffic congestion. It provides adequate infrastructure to connect the commercial /industrial developments adjacent to Barker Road to interstate commerce routes on SR290, SR27 and Interstate 90 throughout Washington, Idaho, Spokane County and the Cities of Spokane Valley & Liberty Lake. The project is necessary to resolve critical traffic safety issues that pose a high risk of train-motorist accidents. It addresses a failing traffic intersection as required by Law. It opens up over 200 acres of land for commercial /industrial development that will strengthen the economic vitality of the City and create /retain jobs. This project is part of the larger Bridging the Valley project. Bridging the Valley (BTV) is a series of projects that will separate vehicle traffic from train traffic in the 42 mile corridor between Spokane, Washington and Athol, Idaho. The separation of railroad and roadway grades in this corridor —which currently includes 75 railroad /roadway crossings —will promote future economic growth, traffic mobility, traffic safety, and train whistle noise abatement. The Bridging the Valley program also envisions the relocation of Union Pacific Rail Yard from the area adjacent to the Spokane County Fair and Expo Center at Havana and Sprague Avenue to the area adjacent to Barker and Trent. BTV will create new opportunities for economic development and redevelopment at both locations. The requested appropriation will fund the remainder of the design phase and the right -of -way acquisition for the project. The 30% preliminary design of the project was completed with a previous appropriation under SAFETEA FY04. The tasks to be completed include, but are not limited to the following: 100% Design Plans, Specifications and Cost Estimates including Contract Documents for Bidding Drainage Design Traffic P /an Design Utility Plan Design, (relocation of water, sewer, power, and telecom lines) Geotechnica/ Studies and Design Pavement and Road Design Bridge Structural Design Right -of -Way negotiation and acquisition Justification of funding (If this is left blank your project will not be considered) - How does this request fit within the identified bill and account (cite specific precedents and overall purpose of account): - Does this request have a connection to interstate commerce? - Does your request facilitate the movement of goods and services between states? 2 - Does your request create jobs? Does your request contribute to the economic growth of the United States? Background: Bridging The Valley meets both of the eligibility requirements for this capital grant program in that safety, mobility, and quality of life are significantly improved, and it will have substantial economic development impacts on the region in terms of job creation and improved freight mobility. This project would be a model project for "subsection F" of the bill, which allows "agreements to combine amounts" if the project will benefit two or more states. It also leverages a 5% private match from the railroads, which improves its chances for funding under this account. The state's 10% percent match requirement for this request has already been met. The BNSF railroad corridor is a primary east -west rail line between Seatt /e, WA and Chicago, IL. Approximately 50 trains per day pass the rail crossing at Barker Road. Barker Road serves an area of the City that has been experiencing strong growth since it holds some of the last large tracts of undeveloped land within the City limits. Traffic on Barker Road is projected to dramatically increase as the area is fully developed. The intersection at Barker Road and SR290 (Trent Ave.) already experiences congestion from the existing developments that has resulted in a Level of Service (LOS) of 'F'. The failing LOS has led to restrictions on new development along Barker Road in the vicinity of the intersection. The high train volumes intersecting Barker Road at the at -grade crossing pose an increasing safety risk. As the surrounding area grows, the risk of train - vehicle collisions will rapidly increase. While these types of accidents are relatively rare, they have a very high risk of fatalities. The project is necessary to resolve critical traffic safety issues that pose a high risk of train- motorist accidents. It addresses a failing traffic intersection as required by Law, and it opens up hundreds of acres of land for commercial /industrial development that will strengthen the economic vitality of the City/region and create /retain jobs. It will also greatly improve the efficiency of freight movement through the region. Economic Benefits: The proposed project will promote economic development on two fronts. First, construction of the project will create or retain approximately 600 jobs for a duration of two years. These include jobs directly employed by contractors and indirectly employed through material suppliers, related services and engineering /management of the project. This is based upon an approximate rate of 10 jobs created or retained for every $1,000,000 in total project cost. Second, the project opens up over 200 acres of property for commercial and industrial development by eliminating restrictions on development. The area surrounding Barker road includes some of the last large tracts of easily developab /e land within the City Limits. There is already some light industrial development in the area, and the easy access to SR290, 5R27, 1 -90 and both BNSF and Union Pacific Railroad lines provides ideal transportation infrastructure to support continued industrial and commercial development and interstate commerce. Development of this area is vital to the long -term economic growth, viability, and sustainabi /ity of the City and the region. Congestion Relief Benefits: The existing intersection has a Level of Service of 'F: High train volumes, (approx. 50 per day) that are up to 7,700 feet in length, have an effect on the flow of traffic at the intersection. Trains speeds vary based on direction for entry or exit from the BNSF Hauser Refueling depot. When passing each other, these trains create walls of rail cars extending up to 3 mi /es in length. This creates 5362 hours of vehicle delay annually (2003) and forecast to increase to 11,994 vehicle hours of de /ay by 2030 without this project. This is lust due to delay caused by trains. Additional delay is created by the existing poor geometrics and sight distance. Barker Road northbound traffic has difficulty accessing SR290 due to high State highway speeds and high traffic volumes. SR290 also has a limited westerly field of vision, preventing the ability to see appropriate gaps in oncoming traffic. The proposed project would eliminate the train - vehicle conflicts and delays from the at -grade railroad crossing and provide appropriate high -speed on and off ramps for traffic to enter and exit SR290 from Barker Road. These improvements would improve the Level of Service(LOS) for Barker Road /SR290(Trent Ave) intersection from 'F' to 'A'. The realignment of Wellesley eliminates additional congestion on SR 290 by consolidating access points for Barker and Wellesley to one appropriate /y designed interchange Freloht Mobility Benefits: The proposed project will further enhance development of the proposed Union Pacific rail loading facility adjacent to the project site, thereby encouraging the use and promotion of Intermodal and trans - loading opportunities for area shippers and manufacturers It also promotes improved freight movement through Spokane County /Kootenai County by eliminating vehicle-train conflicts. Barker Road provides one of the more direct accesses to Interstate 90 from the east Sullivan Industrial Park facilities. Barker Road is a heavily used truck route for freight coming from Canada and north Idaho. Trucks use Barker Road to access I -90 westbound to avoid the congestion on Highway 95 through Coeur d'Alene, Id. 3 Specific proposed language for Congresswoman's request to the Committee (if any): Appropriate $3.65 Million to the Washington Department of Transportation for final design and right of way for the Barker Road /BNSF Grade Separation Project as part of the Bridging the Valley rail corridor project. IV. SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION FOR DEFENSE AND EPA /STAG REQUESTS IF PROJECT REQUEST I5 WITHIN EITHER OF THESE AREAS, PLEASE FILL OUT THE APPROPRIATE SECTION BELOW IV.A DEFENSE REQUEST ONLY 1) Appropriations Account: (Please check) RDT &E _Procurement _O &M Counter Drugs Medical __Reserve Equipment __National Guard Equipment __Other (DW, for example) 2) Service: (Please check) Army __Army Reserve ___Navy Navy Reserve Marine Corps Marine Corps Reserve __Air Force _ Air Force Reserve Intelligence ___Army Guard ___Air National Guard 3) Line Item Title: 4) Identification: R -1 /PE # P -1 /Line # TIARA /3MIP (Intel Only) _ _ 5) Sub - Activity Group (required for Personnel and O &M): IV.IB EPA /STAG REQUEST ONLY 1) Total Population Served by project: 2) Estimated Cost of project based on facilities plan or preliminary engineering report: 3) Amount received from State Revolving Fund; i.e. Drinking Water SRF or Clean Water SRF: 4) Amount received from Dept. of Agriculture, Rural Development Program: 5) Primary Purpose Economic Development Projected Growth EPA compliance requirement (may check more than 1): Public health benefits Water quality improvements EPA consent decree 6) Is preliminary planning and engineering design completed? 7) Does the community have a financing plan certified by an authorized local official demonstrating how it will cover the 45% matching funds? 8) Assuming you do not receive full Federal funding for 55% of the project, is there a financing plan, certified by an authorized local official, demonstrating how the remaining cost of the project will be covered? 9) Is there a completed facility plan, an approved capital improvement plan, or preliminary engineering report for the project that demonstrates it is cost - effective and that it will conform with NEPA requirements? 10) a) Has the community applied for project loan funding from the appropriate State Revolving Fund; i.e. Drinking Water SRF or Clean Water SRF? b) If yes, was the project denied funding or did it fail to make a priority list for future funding under that program? 11) a) Has the community applied for funding from the Department of Agriculture, Rural Development program? b) If yes, was the project denied funding or did it fail to make a priority list for future funding under that program? V. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 4 Please enter any additional information that is relevant to the Organization's request in the space provided below: Safety Benefits The proposed project eliminates an at -grade railroad crossing and at -grade intersection of Barker Road and a high -speed state highway (SR290). Federal Railroad Administration records show 23 railroad crossing related accidents in Spokane County from 2000- 2009 including 4 fatalities. This is a fatality rate of more than 1 for every 6 accidents. The most recent crossing accident at Barker Road was a fatality in 1991. FRA records calculate the probability of an accident at the Barker /BNSF grade crossing as approximately 1 in 34 for any given year. The project will also construct a diamond pattern interchange with on and off ramps for the intersection with SR290 (Trent Ave.) SR290 is a 4 -lane, 50 mph, state highway at Barker Road. The line of site is limited to the west of the intersection due to a crest in the highway road. The proposed improvements will eliminate the risk of a train - vehicle collision. Environmental Benefits The proposed project will reduce congestion from a LOS of 'F' to a LOS of A'. Based upon elimination of 5362 vehicle hours of delay annually, this will reduce carbon monoxide and other green house gas emissions (NOx and VOCs) generated from idling vehicles by approximately 864 lbs. per year. The project will incorporate sustainable development techniques to the extent that is feasible. Sustainab /e practices will include emerging more environmentally friendly stormwater treatment and disposal methods such as Low impact Development Practices to reduce the stormwater runoff and treat the remaining the stormwater before disposal. The project will also incorporate LED technology to reduce lighting costs for the interchange. As a trans - continental rail corridor, BNSF transports a wide variety of hazardous and toxic chemica /s and materia /s through the area. At -grade crossings create risk of exposure to these chemicals and materials to the traveling public and the community whether it is into the air or into the Spokane - Rathdrum Prairie Sole Source Aquifer. This project permanent /y stops the risk of exposure at this location by eliminating the potential for rail- vehicle conflicts. P /ease note the attached support letters VI. INSTRUCTIONS FOR SUBMISSION Please submit the completed form and letter of local support via email to: IGmberly.Betz @mail.house.gov or via fax to: (202) 225 -3392. If you require assistance In completing this form, please contact (202) 225 -2006. Please keep in mind the deadline for submission Is close of business on Friday, February, 19 2010. 5 SRTC Spokane Regional Transportation Council 2 21 W. First Avenue, Suite 310 Spokane, WA 99201 -3613 (509) 343 -6370 FAX: (509) 343 -6400 February 19, 2010 U.S. Senator Patty Murray 2988 Jackson Federal Bldg. 915 2nd Avenue Seattle, Washington 98174 Dear Senator Murray: As the federally designated metropolitan planning organization (MPO), Spokane Regional Transportation Council in collaboration with the region's transportation agencies and advocacy groups, has conducted a review and prioritization of transportation programs, projects, and studies that would like to be considered for 2011 Congressional Appropriations. The process conducted by SRTC involved representation from all modes of transportation, business and economic development interests, labor, environmental, and various advocacy groups. Projects were scored based on criteria that looked at readiness, regional impact, multimodal characteristics, and economic development opportunity, improvement to livability and sustainability, as well as consistency with the long range Metropolitan Transportation Plan. The results of the scoring process were presented at a forum hosted by Greater Spokane Incorporated in the fall of 2009, where the project descriptions and ranking were openly discussed and considered. The SRTC Board received the recommendations and approved the priority list in December. I am pleased to inform you the City of Spokane Valley's Barker Road Overpass Project is ranked as the 2 highest roadway project in the Spokane region. As part of the overall Bridging the Valley program of projects, Barker Road eliminates both an existing at -grade railroad crossing, as well as intersection with State Route 290 to traverse eastward to the Idaho State Line. There are also positive livability impacts to residential neighborhoods, economic development opportunities and environmental benefits associated with protecting the regions sole source Aquifer. This appropriation request seeks funding to complete the final design and acquire rights of way for the project. This is done in anticipation of seeking competitive grant at both the State and National level. SRTC believes projects such as these will be better positioned to compete, if they are able to quickly move into construction after this phase is completed. On behalf of the SRTC Board I am authorized to indicate our complete support for this project. Should you have questions, please feel free to contact me at (509) 343 -6370 Sincerely Z/ Glenn F. Miles Manager SRTC Spokane Regional Transportation Council 2 21 W. First Avenue, Suite 310 • Spokane, WA 99201 -3613 (509) 343 -6370 FAX: (509) 343 -6400 February 19, 2010 U.S. Senator Maria Cantwell U.S. Federal Courthouse W. 920 Riverside, Suite 697 Spokane, WA 99201 Dear Senator Cantwell: As the federally designated metropolitan planning organization (MPO), Spokane Regional Transportation Council in collaboration with the region's transportation agencies and advocacy groups, has conducted a review and prioritization of transportation programs, projects, and studies that would like to be considered for 2011 Congressional Appropriations. The process conducted by SRTC involved representation from all modes of transportation, business and economic development interests, labor, environmental, and various advocacy groups. Projects were scored based on criteria that looked at readiness, regional impact, multimodal characteristics, and economic development opportunity, improvement to livability and sustainability, as well as consistency with the long range Metropolitan Transportation Plan. The results of the scoring process were presented at a forum hosted by Greater Spokane Incorporated in the fall of 2009, where the project descriptions and ranking were openly discussed and considered. The SRTC Board received the recommendations and approved the priority list in December. I am pleased to inform you the City of Spokane Valley's Barker Road Overpass Project is ranked as the 2 highest roadway project in the Spokane region. As part of the overall Bridging the Valley program of projects, Barker Road eliminates both an existing at -grade railroad crossing, as well as intersection with State Route 290 to traverse eastward to the Idaho State Line. There are also positive livability impacts to residential neighborhoods, economic development opportunities and environmental benefits associated with protecting the regions sole source Aquifer. This appropriation request seeks funding to complete the final design and acquire rights of way for the project. This is done in anticipation of seeking competitive grant at both the State and National level. SRTC believes projects such as these will be better positioned to compete, if they are able to quickly move into construction after this phase is completed. On behalf of the SRTC Board I am authorized to indicate our complete support for this project. Should you have questions, please feel free to contact me at (509) 343 -6370 Sincerely // Glenn F. Miles Manager SRTC S pokane Regional Transportation Council 2 21 W. First Avenue, Suite 310 Spokane, WA 99201 -3613 (509) 343 -6370 FAX: (509) 343 -6400 February 19, 2010 U.S. Congresswoman Cathy Mc Morris - Rodgers 10 North Post, Suite 625 Spokane, WA 99201 Dear Congresswoman Mc Morris - Rodgers: As the federally designated metropolitan planning organization (MPO), Spokane Regional Transportation Council in collaboration with the region's transportation agencies and advocacy groups, has conducted a review and prioritization of transportation programs, projects, and studies that would like to be considered for 2011 Congressional Appropriations. The process conducted by SRTC involved representation from all modes of transportation, business and economic development interests, labor, environmental, and various advocacy groups. Projects were scored based on criteria that looked at readiness, regional impact, multimodal characteristics, and economic development opportunity, improvement to livability and sustainability, as well as consistency with the long range Metropolitan Transportation Plan. The results of the scoring process were presented at a forum hosted by Greater Spokane Incorporated in the fall of 2009, where the project descriptions and ranking were openly discussed and considered. The SRTC Board received the recommendations and approved the priority list in December. I am pleased to inform you the City of Spokane Valley's Barker Road Overpass Project is ranked as the 2nd highest roadway project in the Spokane region. As part of the overall Bridging the Valley program of projects, Barker Road eliminates both an existing at -grade railroad crossing, as well as intersection with State Route 290 to traverse eastward to the Idaho State Line. There are also positive livability impacts to residential neighborhoods, economic development opportunities and environmental benefits associated with protecting the regions sole source Aquifer. This appropriation request seeks funding to complete the final design and acquire rights of way for the project. This is done in anticipation of seeking competitive grant at both the State and National level. SRTC believes projects such as these will be better positioned to compete, if they are able to quickly move into construction after this phase is completed. On behalf of the SRTC Board I am authorized to indicate our complete support for this project. Should you have questions, please feel free to contact me at (509) 343 -6370 Sincerely f� Glenn F. Miles Manager Ear a�[ y $th © ©ll Q� �� ti �o 36 , 'F h b -� t 12325 East Grace Spokane WA 99216 kry a Phone 509.924.1830 Fax 509.927.9500 Website www.evsd.org Superintendent: John Glenewinlsel Board of Directors: Mitch Jensen Mice hiarris Heidi Gi €iingharon fterri Lunstroth Roger Trainor February 19, 2010 • Representative Cathy McMorris Rodgers 10 North Post Street, Suite 625 • Spokane, WA 99201 Dear Representative McMorris Rodgers: Please accept the following letter as evidence of East Valley School District's unconditional support for the project being submitted by the City of Spokane Valley to • improve safety by upgrading the railroad grade at Baker and Trent roads in the Spokane Valley. East Valley School District struggles with both safety and inconvenience issues related to the rail system that bisects our district and separates our schools from each other, emergency service and families. Just last month we had a parent severely injured as they attempted to cross an unregulated rail crossing similar to the one identified for improvement. • hope that you will give this request your highest consideration. If you have any questions or need additional information please do not hesitate to contact me at (509) 924 -1830. • Sincerely, Joh enewinkel • • Su er ntendent • SPOKANE AREA GooD ROA ,J S ASSOCIATION P.O. BOX 14009 • SPOKANE VALLEY, WASHINGTON 99214 -4009 • TEL. (509) 926 -9356 Mr. Steve Worley, P.E. City of Spokane Valley 11707 E. Sprague Avenue, Suite 106 Spokane Valley, WA 99206 Dear Mr. Worley, In regards to the City's application for federal funding for the design and right -of -way phases of the Barker Road rail overpass the Spokane Area Good Roads Association would like to encourage our federal delegation to support this major road improvement. The Bridging the Valley is second only to the completion of the North Spokane Corridor in our long term transportation funding advocacy. The Spokane area has been diligent in planning to make our area attractive and safe for families to grow and prosper. Transportation infrastructure is one of the major aspects in how communities maintain and improve their quality of life. The separation of rail and road is a critical element of how communities improve their infrastructure. With 60 -80 trains a day passing through our valley corridor the Fewer at grade crossings we have improves our safety and maintains our flowing traffic. We commend the City of Spokane Valley to advocate and pursue funding to design and eventually build this critical intersection. • Sincerely, • • Jo, Tortorelli Secretary /Executive Director Officers: Tim 'Welsh, President; Steve Robinson, Vice President; Joe Tortorelli, Secretary Directors: David Coombs, W. Stacey Cowles, Pat Davidson, Roger Flint, James P. McGoldrick (Emeritus), Mark Murphy, Michael K. Murphy (Emeritus), Tom Quigley, Ron Stanley, Peter Stanton, Richard Wendle, James C. Williams Continuous Service Since 1903 * Good Roads Mean Better Business and Better Understanding Among Communities d 801 W. Riverside, Suite too, Spokane, WA 99201 G reater Phone: 509.624.1393 or 1.800.SPOKANE Spokane Fax: 5 Incorporated ,,,,,, �. grEr: lt��rs� ,i:atleit,cor ►,�,t�:1 ►ecl.r�i IPA February 18, 2010 Honorable Senator Patty Murray 173 Russell Senate Office Building Washington, D.C. 20501 Dear Senator Murray, We support the funding for the design and right -of -way phases of the Barker Road /BNSF (Burlington Northern Santa Fe) Grade Separation Project. The project will reconstruct Barker Road to pass over three BNSF tracks and will be the first of several phases to complete the "Bridging the Valley" project. The Barker Road /BNSF Grade Separation Project Nvi11 improve public safety by removing streets with at -grade crossings that will reduce rail /vehicle collisions and will improve access to the Spokane Industrial Park. The increased access to the Spokane Industrial Park will positively affect the economic growth in the area. Greater Spokane Incorporated and our chamber partners advocate at the state, local, and federal level for the start of this project and continue to campaign for the completion of the "Bridging the Valley" project. Upon completion, the "Bridging the Valley" project will improve traffic flow, reduce noise levels, eliminate Avail time, and xvi1l enhance development opportunities. Sincerely, r Richard G. Hadley President and Chief Executive Officer Greater Spokane Incorporated Greater Spokane Incorporated - Integrated to Accelerate Regional Economic Prosperity - The Spokane EDC and Chamber 1Ntis1 •.zR>to-siOaneineorponited.ork (� Sol W. Riverside, Suite 100, Spokane, WA 99201 G reater Phone: 509.6 or 1.80o.SPOKANE Siokane Fax:509- 747.0077 Incor porated ,�q ^, , nv„•. grrnicrspc +kanc�incnrporated.nre Incorporated TPA February 18, 2010 Honorable Cathy McMorris Rodgers 1323 Longworth House Office Bldg. Washington, D.C.20515 Dear Representative McMorris Rodgers , We support the funding for the design and right -of -way phases of the Barker Road /BNSF (Burlington Northern Santa Fe) Grade Separation Project. The project will reconstruct Barker Road to pass over three BNSF tracks and will be the first of several phases to complete the "Bridging the Valley" project. The Barker Road /BNSF Grade Separation Project will improve public safety by removing streets with at -grade crossings that will reduce rail /vehicle collisions and will improve access to the Spokane Industrial Park. The increased access to the Spokane Industrial Park will positively affect the economic growth in the area. Greater Spokane Incorporated and our chamber partners advocate at the state, local, and federal level for the start of this project and continue to campaign for the completion of the "Bridging the Valley" project. Upon completion, the "Bridging the Valley" project will improve traffic flow, reduce noise levels, eliminate wait time, and will enhance development opportunities. Sincerely, Richard G. Hadley President and Chief Executive Officer Greater Spokane Incorporated Greater Spokane Incorixirated -integrated to Accelerate Regional Economic Prosperity - The Sliokane EDC and Chamber sat Lspokaneinconioraled.org 8o1 W. Riverside, Suite too, Spokane, WA 9920t G reater Phone: 509.624.1393 or 1.80o.SPOKANE SckaIie I +�! Fax: 509.747.0077 w ∎ w . .grealerspokaneincorporated.org Incorporated im February 18, 2010 Honorable Senator Maria Cantwell 511 Dirksen Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510 Dear Senator Cantwell, We support the funding for the design and right -of -way phases of the Barker Road /BNSF (Burlington Northern Santa Fe) Grade Separation Project. The project will reconstruct Barker Road to pass over three BNSF tracks and will be the first of several phases to complete the "Bridging the Valley" project. The Barker Road /BNSF Grade Separation Project will improve public safety by removing streets with at -grade crossings that will reduce rail /vehicle collisions and will improve access to the Spokane Industrial Park. The increased access to the Spokane Industrial Park will positively affect the economic growth in the area. Greater Spokane Incorporated and our chamber partners advocate at the state, local, and federal level for the start of this project and continue to campaign for the completion of the `Bridging the Valley" project. Upon completion, the "Bridging the Valley" project will improve traffic flow, reduce noise levels, eliminate wait time, and will enhance development opportunities. Sincerely, e `" U }( Richard G. Hadley President and Chief Executive Officer Greater Spokane Incorporated Crater Spokane Incorporated - Integrated to Accelerate Regional Economic Prosperity - The Spokane EDC and chamber ws lls.grs',lttT5P,kanriDS i1,9IiticAiors ° FIRE VAL4 DEPARTMENT 10319 EAST SPRAGUE AVE. • SPOKANE VALLEY, WA 99206 -3627 • (509) 928 -1700 e FAX (509) 892 -4125 www.spokanevalleyfire.com Mike Thompson Chief February 17, 2010 City of Spokane Valley 11707 E Sprague Ave Suite 106 Spokane Valley WA 99206 Dear Council Members: I am writing to express Spokane Valley Fire Department's support for the Barker Road /BNSF Grade Separation Project. This project was reviewed and identified as an important priority by the regional transportation planning organization. The WSDOT agreed with this assessment and sent a letter to support consideration of this project. Barker Road is a significant North /South emergency route for SVFD and our community. At this time, we have a fire station planned on this road about a mile south of the rail crossing. As the train traffic increases, access over the BNSF tracks is becoming increasingly more difficult and causing delays in time critical citizen calls for emergency services as the population grows. Since Barker Road is a major transportation corridor for commercial, residential and emergency service traffic, it is vital that the grades be separated. BNSF traffic crosses east to west through our communities and from the State Line of Idaho west, there are seven miles of track before there is a crossing not at grade. SVFD response times, citizen safety and the firefighters are being adversely impacted by the lack of crossings. Barker Road is a logical and strategic location to place the next crossing. I respectfully ask that you provide your support to this community safety issue. If you need additional information, please contact Chief Mike Thompson at (509) 928 -1700. Sincerely Q ∎ LL_ • it Bill Anderson Chair, Board of Fire Commissioners � Washington State Transportation Building Department of Transportation x 300 Avenue S.E. P.O. Bo Park Paula J. Hammond, P.E. Olympia, WA 98504 -7300 Secretary of Transportation 360 - 705 - 7000 TTY: 1- 800 - 833 -6388 www.wsdot.wa.gov February 11, 2010 The Honorable Patty Murray 173 Russell Senate Office Building Washington, D.C. 20510 The Honorable Maria Cantwell 511 Dirksen Senate Office Building Washington, D.C. 20510 The Honorable Cathy McMorris Rodgers 1323 Longworth House Office Building Washington, D.C. 20515 Dear Senators Murray and Cantwell and Congresswoman McMorris Rodgers: I am writing to express WSDOT's support for the Barker Road/BNSF Grade Separation Project submitted to you by the City of Spokane Valley. This project has been reviewed, and subsequently identified as an important priority, by the regional transportation planning organization. We at WSDOT agree with this assessment and hope you will give serious consideration to this project. If you have questions about this project please contact the project sponsor or Larry Ehl at (360) 705 -7507. Sincerely, Paula Hammond Secretary of Transportation LE: cc: Larry Ehl, WSDOT