The URL can be used to link to this page

2010, 03-30 Study Session AGENDA SPOKANE VALLEY CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING STUDY SESSION FORMAT 6:00 p.m. Tuesday, March 30,2010 CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 11707 East Sprague Avenue,First Floor (Please Silence Your Cell Phones During the Meeting) DISCUSSION LEADER SUBJECT/ACTIVITY GOAL 1. Mark Peters, Executive Director End of 2009 Report Discussion/Information International Trade Alliance 2. Mary May Energy Efficiency Block Grant Update Discussion/Information 3. Christina Janssen/ Annual Comprehensive Plan Discussion/Information Mike Basinger Proposed Amendments 4. Mike Jackson Airway Heights Interlocal, Plan Discussion/Information Review Services 5. Steve Worley Barker Bridge Update Discussion/Information 6. Mike Jackson Law Enforcement Contract Discussion/Information 7. Mayor Towey Advance Agenda Discussion/Information 8. Information Only(will not be discussed or reported): Corbin Sewer Pump Station Request 9. Mayor Towey Council Check in Discussion/Information 10. Mike Jackson City Manager Comments Discussion/Information ADJOURN Note: Unless otherwise noted above, there will be no public comments at Council Study Sessions. However, Council always reserves the right to request information from the public and staff as appropriate. During meetings held by the City of Spokane Valley Council,the Council reserves the right to take"action"on any item listed or subsequently added to the agenda. The term"action" means to deliberate,discuss,review,consider,evaluate,or make a collective positive or negative decision. NOTICE: Individuals planning to attend the meeting who require special assistance to accommodate physical, hearing, or other impairments,please contact the City Clerk at(509)921-1000 as soon as possible so that arrangements may be made. Study Session Format Agenda March 30,2010 Page 1 of 1 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: March 30, 2010 City Manager Sign-off: Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ® admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: International Trade Alliance End of 2009 Report GOVERNING LEGISLATION: PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: BACKGROUND: The International Trade Alliance is a non-profit organization that supports and promotes international business in the Inland Northwest of the United States. They work with area businesses to help them establish or expand their global presence. The International Trade Alliance is the only organization in Eastern Washington that represents international business issues at the local, state and federal levels. Mark Peters, Executive Director of the International Trade Alliance will take this opportunity to introduce himself to Councilmembers, and present the ITA's end of 2009 report. OPTIONS: RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: STAFF CONTACT: ATTACHMENTS: Organizational Update Year End 2009 PowerPoint presentation 601 W.Main•Spokane,Washington•99201•509.413.1470•info @intrade.org F • Organizational Update International Year End 2009 4.4 `, TRADE ALLIANCE The ITA is actively working with two major renewable energy manufacturers for investment in Washington State Washington Exports ITA Private Funding $200,000 $200,000.00 $150,000 - _ $100,000.00 IWW1671MWMPI- $100,000 $50,000 $28,919 18,617 r $0 2007 2008 2009 2008(1st Qtr) 2009(1st Qtr) World China 1 Measure Description 2009 Goals Comments-2009 Achievements Export sales by regional companies either 1. Export Sales through direct support from ITA and/or as $10 million in ITA Established first commissioned based agreement with supported sales Spokane software company. Consulting ramps up services. determined through US Government statistics Public Income:Dramatic increase in 2009 due to 1 year 2. Organization Private sector support is critical to ITA. The 10%Increase grant procured from federal sources.Private income:Goal Revenue organization would like a 50/50 partnership of$60,000+achieved in 2009 New companies participating in exports are 3. New to Export stronger and withstand domestic economic 12 NTEs Work underway with 12 NTE firms in 2009 downturns,increasing jobs for our community APP Launch Dinner-98%,Trade Week Lunch-89%, 4. Client Provide high quality services to the community 90%or higher European Wind Energy Trade Show(France)93.75%.China Satisfaction that are of value 98% 0 Trade Mission:98%Avg Client Satisfaction-94.68% ITA will continue to position Spokane as a global Engage 10 Spokane Initiated Eco-Agreement discussions as part of the APP center for trade and clean technology,through 5.Trade area clean tech initiative.Designated for Federal appropriations by Senator the Asia Pacific Partnership(APP)initiative. ITA Leadership companies in Cantwell. Media coverage by KHQ,Spokesman,and will also educate the community and its leaders initiative Inlander.Developing partnership with Expeditors on the impacts of trade aft * Based upon US Department of Commerce numbers, ITA estimates 30%of all jobs related to exporting in Spokane County are in the City of Spokane Valley. This translates to 1500 jobs. *According to US Department of Commerce statistics, of the$1 billion in exports in Spokane County,ITA estimates 1/3 originates from the Spokane Valley. *Provided training to hundreds of particpants in various aspects of international business in 2009. *Targeted two major Chinese firms for Foreign Direct Investment in Washington. * Hotstart Manufacturing revenues continue to increase from ITA's consulting on Russian market expansion. ITA assists Hotstart Manufacturing with identification of new market expansion opportunities in China,culminating in the Martinec Trade Show in Shanghai in December 2009. International TRADE ALLIANCE International Trade Alliance Our Mission . . . Using our internal and external expertise, we build the international trade capacity and success of Inland Northwest companies and position the region as a global center for international trade International TRADE ALLIANCE Why IT/4? > Washington leads the country in exports and jobs dependent on global trade � , 1 0 Jobs related to exports pay II 4 ��, \ between 13 - 18 percent more I � � ¢�� \ than average wages �, �> 95 / of all consumers live 1 \ . . .,- - \ outside the Untied states . I \ , , o Spokane county had nearly $ 1 �„� Billion in export during 2008 ,' o Est. 5000 + jobs locally! ..,_ (..1 _.0) --�` International \ TRADE ALLIANCE What Do Companies To compete globally exporters need to be prepared Market research Country/Region specific regulatory issues? Find potential customers or other partners IP, other int'l contracts Translation/interpreting . ; International TRADE ALLIANCE ,ti E ITA . . ctiv � t � es International Consultancy • (Trade Export Leadership Navigation Advocacy and local events • International Events International t .. TRADE ALLIANCE Consulting Does overseas seem out of reach? Importance of diversifying markets Vital source of private revenue for ITA / Ar 104 (11i) International TRADE ALLIANCE Our partners • Federal : U . S . Commercial Service , U . S . Export / Import Bank • State : Department of Commerce , Export Finance Assistance Center Private : ITA Board of Directors • Local : County, Cities , GSI , SIRTI , Impact WA, area colleges and Universities and other local organizations Greater -4.4(C Spok�ne � �., g wI Incorporates co :hT`� Department of Commerce International rM!N 6 TRADE ALLIANCE innovation is in our nature. Performance Metrics Measure Description 2010 Goals Comments/Achievements 2009 Export sales by regional companies either Estimated$2-3 million in sales and contracts directly 1. Export Salegthrou h support from ITA and/or as $5 million in ITA ort direct supported by ITA efforts. 2009 saw a significant decrease in determined through US Government statistics Spokane area exports following statewide trends. 2.Or anizationprivate sector support 2009 goal not achieved based upon the utilization of Federal g pport is critical to ITA. The 10%Increase funds to offset demand on local community for programmatic Revenueorganization would like a 50/50 partnership support. New companies participating in exports are Work undertaken on behalf of 13 NTE firms in 2009. 3.New to Exportstronger and withstand domestic economic 10 NTEs Exceeding our goal of 12.Trade projects undertaken for more downturns,increasing jobs for our community than 30 companies. • 4.Spokanewi at impact has ITA had on Spokane Valley Engage at least 10 Projects completed for:United Coatings,Lawton Printing, Valley Impact Business companies&Impact Hotstart Mfg.,Spokane Industries,Spokane Valley Rotary,& >$3 million in sales ReliOn.Export sales to Valley>$2 million ITA will continue to position Spokane as a global center for trade and clean technology, Develop regional and Completed APP initiative,and will continue Spokane/China S.Tradethrough the Asia Pacific Partnership(APP) state-wide trade trade expansion efforts.2010 Expanded focus on BRIC Leadershipinitiative. ITA will also educate the promotion countries. 2 clean energy firms look at Spokane for possible community and its leaders on the impacts of partnerships investment. Hosting a large logistics firm in ITA offices. trade LBased upon analysis of US Department of Commerce numbers_ p p 5000 jobs in Spokane County depend on exports, more than 2000 high paying jobs in Spokane Valley! -According to US Department of Commerce statistics, nearly $1 billion of Washington exports were from in Spokane County in 2008. Expect at least a 1 S%drop for 2009, meaning the county economy lost$1 50 million, as much as $70 million for Spokane Valley businesses in outside revenue coming into the community' * Washington exports down 20% through third quarter of 2009 * Down 51% to Canada - Down 65% to Japan - Down 1 3% to China International TRADE ALLIANCE But non - profit doesn 't mean we can 't make a profit! Funding can be fickle , no Spokane Valley funding in 2010? Decrease dependency on 4. public funds Focus on private revenue International TRADE ALLIANCE i.at Thank you for your time ! questions ? 6e-A) International TRADE ALLIANCE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: March 30, 2010 City Manager Sign-off: Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ® information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE : Energy Efficiency Block Grant Update GOVERNING LEGISLATION: American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Information Item June 2 and 9, 2009 BACKGROUND: The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 appropriates funding for the Department of Energy (DOE) to issue formula-based grants under the Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant (EECBG) Program. The City of Spokane Valley was awarded $823,400 to spend on energy conservation planning and projects that result in energy savings. In June, 2009, the City Council considered and approved the following projects under the program: • Partnering with AVISTA in a residential and commercial energy audit program; • Traffic signal LED retrofits; • Traffic efficiency improvements (installation of flashing yellow arrows, signal coordination projects, Sprague Avenue ITS); • Bike and pedestrian master plan and partial construction; and • Energy audits and appropriate construction retrofits on City-owned facilities. Our application was approved in November, 2009. Projects must be implemented and completed within 36-months. Funding requirements include public transparency and quarterly updates. OPTIONS: Not applicable. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: None required or requested. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Successful implementation of the projects approved under the EECBG will create long-term energy cost savings to the City budget and create opportunities for further grants and funding. STAFF CONTACT: Mary E. May, AICP ATTACHMENTS: EECBG Program Summary; EECBG Project Status Table Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant (EECBG) Program Summary The purpose of Department of Energy (DOE) EECBG Program is to assist eligible entities in creating and implementing strategies to: • Reduce fossil fuel emissions in a manner that is environmentally sustainable, and to the maximum extent practicable, maximizes benefits for local and regional communities; • Reduce total energy use of the eligible entities; and • Improve energy efficiency in the building sector, the transportation sector and other appropriate sectors. The EECBG Program falls under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. Therefore, special terms and conditions apply to projects funded by the Act relating to: • Reporting, tracking and segregation of incurred costs; • Reporting on job creation and preservation; • Publication of information on the Internet; • Access to records by Inspectors General and the Government Accountability Office; • Prohibition on use of funds for gambling establishments, aquariums, zoos, golf courses or swimming pools; • Ensuring that iron, steel and manufactured goods are produced in the United States; • Ensuring wage rates are comparable to those prevailing on projects of a similar character; • Protecting whistleblowers and requiring prompt referral of evidence of a false claim to an appropriate inspector general; and • Certification and Registration. Entities were allowed to develop various initiatives and projects that address one or more of the purposes of the grant. Each activity an entity undertakes is not required to meet all of the stated purposes. Each entity is required to use the funds in a cost- effective manner that is of maximum benefit to the population of that entity and in a manner that will yield continuous benefits over time in terms of energy and emission reductions. Summary of Projects Staff developed an energy strategy as required by the EECBG Program that includes multiple projects. Several enable the City to respond immediately with improvements that will result in direct energy savings and tangible benefits to the public. Other projects enable the City to establish the necessary documents for continued improvements and energy efficiency. Each of the projects is described below and summarized in the attached table. 1. Partnering with Others for Residential and Commercial Energy Savings: Several goals of the EECBG Program include encouraging coordination among local jurisdictions and other entities, leveraging additional funds, designing programs that will continue beyond the 36-month performance period, and providing community-wide benefits. Staff has partnered with AVISTA whereby Spokane Valley residents and businesses would benefit from EECBG funds through a coordinated education, rebate, energy audit and retrofit program. By participating, the City is leveraging additional funds, including State Energy Program (SEP) funds, up to a possible 100% match. 2. Traffic Signal LEDs: The City has been replacing existing traffic signals with energy-efficient LEDs. The LED lights result in brighter signal displays, an average energy reduction of 39 percent and reduced electricity and energy costs. 3. Traffic Signal Phasing: Projects that reduce car idling time result in reduced carbon emissions and are therefore eligible for funding under the EECBG Program. This project replaces select left turn arrows with a signal head that includes a flashing yellow arrow to reduce delay to left-turning vehicles. 4. Traffic Signal Coordination: This project entails hiring a consultant to develop weekend signal coordination for select corridors. The resulting improved traffic flow reduces car idling time, resulting in reduced carbon emissions. 5. Sprague Avenue ITS: Conduit for the Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) was installed with the Sprague Avenue overlay last summer. The EECBG project fills the conduit with fiber to improve signal communication and coordination. The project will result in reduced car idling time, resulting in reduced carbon emissions. 6. Bike and Pedestrian Master Program: Preparation: A goal of the City's Comprehensive Plan is the adoption of a master plan which will enable the City to leverage further funds for construction of alternative transportation facilities (bike and pedestrian paths) and create a safer environment for the casual or serious, recreational or commute bicycle rider. EECBG funds are approved for use to assist in the preparation of the Bike and Pedestrian Master Program (BPMP). 7. Bike and Pedestrian Master Program: Implementation: This project includes implementation of specific projects after adoption of the BPMP. Projects could include sidewalk construction, bike lane striping and signing, and trail design and/or construction. 8. City Facility Audits and Retrofits: Preliminary walk-throughs were conducted at Centerplace, the Valley Precinct, and the dance hall at Sullivan and 1-90 to identify areas for potential energy improvements. EECBG funds will be used to implement improvements including energy-efficient lighting, water conserving plumbing and landscaping, low-e windows, insulation, and weather striping. 9. Pre-Award Consultant Services: The EECBG program allowed fund expenditure for assistance in preparing the overall energy efficiency and conservation strategy. The City contracted with Coffman Engineers for such assistance. EECBG PROJECT STATUS TABLE March 30, 2010 The City of Spokane Valley is allocated $823,400 from the Energy Efficiency and Conservation Program. Based on the intent of the program and the needs of the City, the following projects were approved. Status for each of the projects is shown as of March 23, 2010. City of Spokane Valley EECBG Projects Summary and Status March 30, 2010 EECBG Project Funding Status 1. Utilities Partnering Program $88,000 Avista Utilities has prepared the energy audit program. The official program launch is expected in April, 2010. No City EECBG dollars have been expended on this project as of March 23, 2010. 2. Traffic Signal LED Replacements $65,000 Anticipated start date late 2010/early 2011. 3. Traffic Signal Phasing (Yellow Arrows) $33,550 Materials ordered for five intersections. Completion of project expected within next 6 months. 4. Traffic Signal Coordination $75,000 Anticipated start date sometime after fall 2010. 5. Sprague Avenue ITS $400,000 Negotiating design scope and fee with the consultant. Design to occur in 2010. Construction possible in late 2010. 6. Bike & Pedestrian Master Plan (BPMP) $38,500 Work program drafted. Existing facility surveys and opportunities and constraints analyses being conducted. Public outreach events to occur in next six months. 7. BPMP: Facility Implementation $100,000 To occur after BPMP completed. 8. City Facility Audits and Retrofits $5,350 Anticipated start date sometime after fall 2010. 9. Pre-Award Consultant Services $18,000 $9,466 paid to Coffman Engineering for assistance in preparing the grant application documents. TOTALS $823,400 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: March 30, 2010 City Manager Sign-off: Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ® new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ® admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: 2010 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendments - Overview PREVIOUS ACTION TAKEN: None BACKGROUND: The Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC 17.80.140) establishes an annual comprehensive plan amendment cycle that runs from November 2nd to November 1st of the following year. The Planning Commission considers applications received prior to November 1st in late spring of the following year, with a decision by City Council in late spring/early summer. All parts of the Comprehensive Plan can be amended during the annual cycle. The Community Development Department received one site specific Comprehensive Plan amendment by November 1, 2009 deadline, city staff initiated two site specific map amendments. Sites that are approved for a Comprehensive Plan amendment will automatically receive a zoning designation that is consistent with the new land use designation. The 2010 Comprehensive Plan text amendments include amendments to five Comprehensive Plan Elements: Chapter 2 - Land Use, Chapter 3 — Transportation, Chapter 4 — Capital Facilities and Public Services, Chapter 7 — Economic Development, and Chapter 8 — Natural Environment. The amendments may also entail minor changes to other elements referencing the proposed amendments. Staff presented the proposed amendments to the Planning Commission at a study session on February 11, 2010. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on the amendments on February 25, 2010. Staff is scheduled to provide Council with the Planning Commission's recommendations and findings at the April 13, 2010 Council meeting. PUBLIC NOTICE: Notice for the proposed amendments was placed in the Spokane Valley News Herald on February 5, 2010 and each site was posted with a "Notice of Public Hearing" sign, with a description of the proposal. Individual notice of the proposals was mailed to all property owners within 400 feet of each amendment. SEPA REVIEW: Pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA — RCW 43.21C) environmental checklists were required for each proposed comprehensive plan amendments. Under SEPA, amendments to the comprehensive plan are considered "non-project actions" defined as actions involving decisions on policies, plans, or programs that contain standards controlling use or modification of the environment. Additional environmental review may be required for the physical development of the subject properties. 1 of 2 Staff reviewed the environmental checklists and a threshold determination was made for each proposed comprehensive plan amendment. Determinations of Non-significance (DNS) were issued for the proposed amendments on February 5, 2010 consistent with the City of Spokane Valley Environmental Ordinance. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT PROPOSALS: Comprehensive plan amendment proposals are organized into individual reports consisting of application materials, staff reports, comprehensive plan maps, zoning maps, aerial maps, vicinity maps, transportation maps, and comments submitted to date to assist the City Council in their review. OPTIONS: Consensus to proceed with first reading scheduled for April 13, 2010 STAFF CONTACT: Greg McCormick, AICP, Planning Division Manager; Mike Basinger, AICP, Senior Planner ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit 1: 2010 Comprehensive Plan amendment docket Exhibit 2: Comprehensive Plan map amendments overview map Exhibit 3: Individual staff reports, amended chapter text, and maps 2 of 2 410-f.litheriss Department of Community Development Planning Division 2010 Comprehensive Plan Annual Amendments March 30, 2010 Lead Planner: Mike Basinger, AICP Planning Team: Christina Janssen Planning Manager: Greg McCormick, AICP CITYHALL(5P KA"EV Department of Community Development Planning Division Comprehensive Planning The Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan (SVCP) lays out a vision for the future of Spokane Valley during a 20-year period and responds to the requirements of the Growth Management Act (GMA) o -. "TY"A«@5POK""EU Department of Community Development Planning Division Purpose of Annual Amendments • Ensure the plan is consistent with: — Community' s vision — City Council policy direction — Internal plans (TIP) • Opportunity to accept public requests • Resolve unforeseen circumstances 41•0°_,..1112ffsmssa Department of Community Development Planning Division 2010 CPA Process • Comprehensive Plan amended annually • November 1St 2009 cut off for applications • PC Public Hearing — February 25 , 2010 • Council Administrative Report — March 30, 2010 • Council First Reading — April 13 , 2010 • Council Second Reading — April 27, 2010 • Appeals to Growth Management Hearings Board C ITY HALL[a]SPOKA N EV, Department of Community Development Planning Division 3 Site-Specific Map Amendments • 1 Privately Initiated - CPA-01 - 1O • 2 City Initiated - CPA-02- 1O - CPA-03 - 10 Department of Community Development Planning Division " "�� TY"A P�K""EV *Siam Department of Community Development Planning Division 2008 Aerial Map *acme -. cirr"A«��PoK""EU Department of Community Development -10•° Planning Division Comprehensive Plan Catal do LCI1N Densit Residential 13roadwav Low Densit! Residential Neighborhood ►nnznnercial Centennial Middle E Lover Density Residential Broadway c,TyHALL@5poKANEv SOO liane Department of Community Development Planning Division Zoning --•_•••■ PC Recommendation: Change Comp Plan designation to Neighborhood Commercial and zone Neighborhood Commercial f roadway e.: • -•••=•• •• Broadway Broadway R-3 NC' -• . R-3 Department of Community Development Planning Division " "�� TY"A P�K""EV *Siam Department of Community Development Planning Division 2008 Aerial Map til a�� " "�� TY"A P�K""EU *Siam Department of Community Development Planning Division Comprehensive Plan Department of Community Development Planning Division Zoning PC Recommendation: ,\i.,,[ Change Comp Plan designation to Heavy Industrial and zone Heavy Industrial F aigiag munincso Department of Community Development Planning Division *Siam -. "TY"ALL]SPOK""EV Department of Community Development Planning Division 2008 Aerial Map IiidLISLPla]°I}i].Gli"L). Soiam -. "TY"A«� POK""EV Department of Community Development Planning Division Comprehensive Plan ,olgatazi liwkwomkritn lawkighta mod A g g 6 indtxstria1 WW1 @ li 'M altokkll MED limfignikilkita III g 11 Industr'61 Ai l a ITY HA L L[a]S POKA N EV �, Department of Community Development Srioliane Planning Division Zoning PC Recommendation: Change Comp Plan designation to :-10 Heavy Industrial and zone Heavy Industrial atria Department of Community Development Spokane Walley Planning Division 2010 Text Amendments • Minor updates to reflect changes in 2009 • Supplemented existing goals with policies for: — Economic Development • Business retention • Local job creation • Education: trade schools — Connectivity • Bicycling and walking — Promote Efficient Practices • Conservation CITYHALL[a]SPOKANEV, Department of Community Development Planning Division City Initiated Text Amendment • CPA-04- 10 (Chapter 2 : Land Use) — Add policies for Development Agreements • Site-specific map amendments — Supplement existing goals to support • Develop programs to preserve open space • Publicizing the community' s heritage • Connecting neighborhoods Spokane"` �4aIley CITYHALL@WOKANEV, Department of Community Development Planning Division City Initiated Text Amendment • CPA-OS - 10 (Chapter 3 — Transportation) — Add reclassified arterials (Map 3 . 1 ) — Add newly developed bike facilities (Map 3 .2) — Add new map for the Local Access Street Plan (Map 3 .7) — Supplement existing goals to support • Reducing vehicle idling — synchronizing traffic signals • Linking facilities with non-motorized transportation • Increase bike lanes in the City • Encourage fuel efficient vehicles in public transportation Spokane"` �4aIley CITYHALL@WOKANEV, Department of Community Development Planning Division City Initiated Text Amendment • CPA-06- 10 (Chapter 4 — CFP & Public Services) — Update 6-yr TIP — Update the LOS table for all arterial intersections — Update the growth assumptions — Supplement existing goals to support • water conservation • recycling • limiting harmful chemicals • education programs for local employment Spokane"` -1•'*4aIley CITYHALL@WOKANEV, Department of Community Development Planning Division City Initiated Text Amendment • CPA-07- 10 (Chapter 7 — Economic Development) — Updated Map 7. 1 Development Activity — Supplement existing goals to support • local businesses • living wages • efficient practices • clean technologies Spokane"` -1•'*4aIley CITYHALL@WOKANEV, Department of Community Development Planning Division City Initiated Text Amendment • CPA-08- 10 (Chapter 8 — Natural Environment) Supplement existing goals to support • protect the aquifer • priority habitat species " "�� TY"A P�K""EV *Siam Department of Community Development Planning Division Questions ? Exhibit 1 City of Spokane Valley 2010 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Docket PRIVATELY INITIATED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SITE SPECIFIC MAP AMENDMENTS File Number Map or Text Summary of Amendment CPA-01-10 Map NE corner of Park & Broadway (LDR to NC) CITY INITIATED COMPRENSIVE PLAN SITE SPECIFIC MAP AMENDMENTS File Number Map or Text Summary of Amendment CPA-02-10 Map DOT Property - 45114.9009 (P/OS to 1-2) CPA-03-10 Map Crown West- 45013.9104 & 45013.9105 (C to 1-2) CITY INITIATED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TEXT AMENDMENTS File Number Map or Text Summary of Amendment CPA-04-10 Text Chapter 2 — Land Use: citizen survey update; Map 2.1 development agreement policies for site-specific map amendments; and implement policy language to supplement existing goals; CPA-05-10 Text Chapter 3 —Transportation: Incorporate Bike Master Map 3.1 Plan and bike facilities constructed in the 2009 Map 3.2 development cycle; update Arterial Street Plan to Map 3.7 (LASP) include Conklin and Indiana reclassifications; incorporate Local Access Street Plan; and implement policy language to supplement existing goals; CPA-06-10 Text Chapter 4 —Capital Facilities and Public Services: Map 4.2 update 6-year TIP; street improvement policies (street trees); LOS table; update Water Districts map; PAA evaluation; and implement policy language to supplement existing goals; CPA-07-10 Map 7.1 Chapter 7 — Economic Development: Update development activity; and implement policy language to supplement existing goals; CPA-08-10 Text Chapter 8 — Natural Environment: Map 8.6 Update Section 8.5.1 — Shoreline Management Areas and applicable goals and polices to reflect updated SMP; and implement policy language to supplement existing goals; Updated: 11/01/09. P:\Community Development\06 Major Documents\Comp Plan\1 Comp Plan Amendments\2010 Comp Plan Amendments. Docket\2010 Amendment Docket.doc City of irprLiberty Lake ASR ' x ft 'ilk •••1; ' ate .111114-111 I EIMMENCi= r'' NV I I I M /"'',0'1 51;-i41 i mils.M. i I II,111.WM I. „I ondi la 0 ow a.,a_=i mi.I I I I In Oilrl IT5. 1 Shelley MIA a r u��>7 - '\ � Rs111111/01717 w�it ran i 1Irr ! 1 \ •• ■I�IC�� ®®■ . \ �Y16111 919 aseero �_ v a \. TEMPW44401:114, su.rdN e•i iEL ;a 7 �m=Si s 11 MIEIDNIalg MI --- 1 zad 44W a 44W bm Halle Exhibit 2 2010 Comprehensive Plan Map Amendments Legend Low Density Residential Medium Density Residential High Density Residential Mixed Use Corridor Mixed Use Office City Center(to be determined) Public/Quasi-Public -.... Neighborhood Commercial Community Commercial Regional Commercial Light Industrial Heavy Industrial Park/Open Space Other Municipalities City of Spokane Valley Urban Growth Area Water Bodies Date:01/26/2010 Map Location 0 0.5 1 2 Miles 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I Notice:The information shown on this map is compiled from various sources and is subject to constant revision.The City makes no claims or guarantees about the accuracy or currency of this map and expressly disclaims liability for errors and omissions in its contents. To confirm accuracy contact the City of Spokane Valley,Community Development Department,Division of Planning,(509)921-1000. Product of the City of Spokane Valley,Community Development Department 2010 Proposed Site-Specific Map Amendments CPA-01 - 10 Thru CPA-03- 10 Planner: Christina Janssen, Assistant Planner CPA- 01 - 10 Site-Specific Map Amendment Proposed Amendment: Comprehensive Plan Map amendment to change the designation on parcel 45182.9010 from Low Density Residential to Neighborhood Commercial with a corresponding zoning change from Single-family Residential District (R-3) to Neighborhood Commercial (NC]. Staff Planner: Christina Janssen COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING DIVISION Serrsuf pokane STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO THE 40,Valley PLANNING COMMISSION CPA-01-10 STAFF REPORT DATE: February 1, 2010 HEARING DATE AND LOCATION: February 25, 2010, beginning at 6:00 p.m., Spokane Valley City Hall Council Chambers, Valley Redwood Plaza Building, 11707 East Sprague Avenue, Suite 101, Spokane Valley, Washington 99206. PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: Comprehensive Plan Map amendment to change the designation on parcel 45182.9010 from Low Density Residential to Neighborhood Commercial with a corresponding zoning change from Single- family Residential District (R-3) to Neighborhood Commercial (NC). This proposal is considered a non-project action under RCW 43.21C. PROPOSAL LOCATION: Parcels 45182.9010; located on the northeast corner of Park Road and Broadway Avenue; further located in the south half of the northwest quarter of Section 18,Township 25 North, Range 44 East, Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washington. OWNER/APPLICANT: Headwaters Development Group, LLC 12402 N.Division Suite 209 Spokane, WA 99201 Estate of Joe and Ida M.Guarisco 1108 N. Sherwood Spokane,WA 99201 APPLICANTS REPRESENTATIVE: Gary Bernardo Bernardo Wills Architects 107 S. Howard Suite 420 Spokane, WA 99201 APPROVAL CRITERIA: Chapter 2 (Urban Land Use) of the Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan, Title 17 (General Provision),Title 19 (Zoning Regulations), and Title 21 (Environmental Controls) of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC), SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Division, after review and consideration of the submitted application and applicable approval criteria,recommends that the Planning Commission approve CPA-01-10. STAFF PLANNER:Christina Janssen,Assistant Planner, Community Development Department REVIEWED BY: Greg McCormick,AICP, Planning Manager, Community Development Department ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit 1: Comprehensive Plan Map Exhibit 2 Zoning Map Exhibit 3: 2008 Aerial Map Exhibit 4: Vicinity Map Exhibit 5: Transportation Map Exhibit 6: Application Submittal Exhibit 7: SEPA Determination Staff Report and Recommendation to the Planning Commission for CPA-01-10 Page 1 of 7 I. BACKGROUND INFORMATION APPLICATION PROCESSING: Chapter 17.80 Permit Processing Procedures in the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC). The following summarizes key application procedures for the proposal. Pre-Application Meeting: August 4, 2009 Application Submitted: November 2, 2009 Determination of Completeness: November 17, 2009 Issuance of Determination of Non-Significance (DNS): February 5, 2010 End of Appeal Period for DNS: February 19, 2010 Date of Published Notice of Public Hearing: February 5, 2010 Date of Mailed Notice of Public Hearing: February 5, 2010 PROPERTY INFORMATION: Size and Characteristics: The site is approximately 2.11 acres in size. The SEPA checklist states the site is flat with an estimated slope of 5 percent. Comprehensive Plan: Low Density Residential Zoning: Single Family Residential District(R-3) Existing Land Use: There is one (1) single family dwelling and several detached structures located on the subject parcel. SURROUNDING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN,ZONING,AND LAND USES: North Comprehensive Plan- Parks/Open Space Zoning- Parks/Open Space (P/OS) Existing Land Uses- City owned public swimming pool South Comprehensive Plan-Neighborhood Commercial (NC) and Low Density Residential (LDR) Zoning --Neighborhood Commercial (NC) and Single Family Residential District (R-3) Existing Land Uses - Convenience store and single family residential East Comprehensive Plan -Low Density Residential Zoning-Single Family Residential District(R-3) Existing Land Uses - Single-family residences and Centennial Middle School West Comprehensive Plan- Low Density Residential (LDR) and Heavy Industrial (HI) Zoning-Single Family Residential District (R-3) and Heavy Industrial (1-2) Existing Land Uses-Single family residential and industrial uses II. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO SEPA Findings: Pursuant to Title 21 (Environmental Controls) of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC), the lead agency has determined that this proposal does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c), The Planning Division issued a Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) for the proposal. This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Conclusion(s): The procedural requirements of the State Environmental Policy Act and Title 21 of the SVMC have been fulfilled by the applicant's submittal of the required SEPA Checklist, and the issuance of the City's threshold determination consisting of a Determination of Non-Significance (DNS). No appeals were received. Staff Report and Recommendation to the Planning Commission for CPA-01-10 Page 2 of 7 II1. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT A. COMPLIANCE WITH TITLE 17 (GENERAL PROVISIONS) OF THE SPOKANE VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE Findings: Section 7.80.140 H. Comprehensive Plan Amendment A. 'royal Criteria S a s kane Valle Munici sal Code 1. The City may approve Comprehensive Plan amendments and area-wide zone map amendments if it finds that (analysis is italicized): a. The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to the public health,safety,welfare, and protection of the environment; Staff Comment: The City's adopted policies of the Comprehensive Plan state in part "the economic development strategy is to promote a more diverse economy[that] would achieve a better balance between jobs, housing and support the City's desired quality of life" (Section 2,3.1). The proposed amendment offers additional opportunities to achieve the balance by expanding the land use available for further diverse development. b. The proposed amendment is consistent with the requirements of Chapter 36.70A RCW and with the portion of the City's adopted plan not affected by the amendment; Staff Comment: The proposed location is served by all necessary urban services and provides for appropriate in-fill development with the City of Spokane Valley, The City has adopted development regulations that are designed to address specific impacts related to new development such as off- street parking, landscaping, lighting,setbacks, and height. The proposed amendment is consistent with the Growth Management Act. Adjacent land use designations are consistent with the proposed amendment. c. The proposed amendment responds to a substantial change in conditions beyond the property owner's control applicable to the area within which the subject property lies; Staff Comment: The proposed amendment responds to a change in conditions. Commercial and industrial development is prominent to the south and southwest of the property. The property has been vacant in the current zoning classification of Single-family Residential District(R-3)for several years. The proposed amendment will allow for small-scale retail and office uses serving the single- family development to northwest and southeast. d. The proposed amendment corrects an obvious mapping error; or Staff Comment: The proposed amendment does not correct a mapping error. e. The proposed amendment addresses an identified deficiency in the Comprehensive Plan. a. Staff Comment: The proposed amendment does not address an identified deficiency in the Comprehensive Plan; however expanding the neighborhood commercial designation would allow additional small-scale retail to serve the neighborhood. 2. The City must also consider the following factors prior to approving Comprehensive Plan amendments: a. The effect upon the physical environment; Staff Comment: Pursuant to Title 21 (Environmental Controls) of the City of Spokane Valley Uniform Development Code, the lead agency has determined that this proposal does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. The comprehensive plan amendment is a non-project action under SEPA. At the time of the submittal of the building permit application, an additional SEPA review would likely be required to evaluate the impacts of the use(s) and proposed structure(s) on the physical environment. Staff Report and Recommendation to the Planning Commission for CPA-01-10 Page 3 of 7 b. The effect on open space,streams,rivers, and lakes; Staff Comment: The SEPA checklist states that there is no surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of site. Water, in varying amounts, is located southwest of the site at the Central Pre-Mix gravel pit. c. The compatibility with and impact on adjacent land uses and surrounding neighborhoods; Staff Comment: The proposed amendment is contiguous to a Neighborhood Commercial Comprehensive Plan designation. At the time of development,standards in Title 22(Design and Development Standards),specifically 22.70(Fencing,Screening, and Landscaping) will reduce impacts on adjacent low density residential designated properties by providing visual separation and physical buffers between land uses. d. The adequacy of and impact on community facilities including utilities, roads, public transportation,parks, recreation, and schools; Staff Comment: The City of Spokane Valley addresses adequacy of community facilities on a citywide basis through capital facilities planning. Policy CFP-9.1 of the Comprehensive Plan recommends a concurrency management system for transportation,sewer, and water facilities. The City of Spokane Valley's Parks and Recreation Plan outlines an implementation strategy including a capital facilities plan, which identifies costs and revenue sources for new parks. At the time of development, the proposed amendment may have an impact on transportation. At the time of the submittal of any building permit applications, an additional SEPA review may likely be required to evaluate the impacts of the use(s)and proposed structure(s)on the physical environment in regards to transportation. e. The benefit to the neighborhood, City, and region; Staff Comment: The proposal is consistent with the existing character of the neighborhood. The parcel proposed to change is in a neighborhood that has existing commercial/industrial on two sides as well as single family residential to the northwest and southeast. f. The quantity and location of land planned for the proposed land use type and density and the demand for such land; Staff Comment: The proposed amendment is approximately 2.11 acres in size and has the potential of a variety of commercial uses. The proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and will have minimal impact on other aspects of the plan. g. The current and projected population density in the area; and Staff Comment: The proposed comprehensive plan amendment will not increase the population density. The proposed comprehensive plan amendment does not demand population analysis. h. The effect upon other aspects of the Comprehensive Plan. Staff Comment: The proposed comprehensive plan amendment is consistent with the comprehensive plan and will have minimal impact on other aspects of the plan. B. COMPLIANCE WITH TITLE 19 (ZONING REGULATIONS) OF THE SPOKANE VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE Findings: Section 19.60.040 Neighborhood Commercial District) Spokane Valley Municipal Code The Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment is from Low Density Residential to Neighborhood Commercial and corresponding zoning map amendment from Single-family Residential District (R-3) to Neighborhood Commercial (NC). Staff Report and Recommendation to the Planning Commission for CPA-01-10 Page4of7 The Neighborhood Commercial designation is intended to provide a limited number of commercial goods and services to surrounding residential neighborhoods. Conclusion(s): The proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment is contiguous to Neighborhood Commercial and Low Density Residential properties and will provide a wider variety of commercial uses to the existing neighborhood. At the time of development,standards in Title 22 (Design and Development Standards), specifically 22.70 (Fencing, Screening, and Landscaping)will reduce impacts on adjacent low density residential designated properties by providing visual separation and physical buffers between land uses. Any future development would be consistent with the intention of the Neighborhood Commercial designation. C. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The Comprehensive plan states that the Neighborhood Commercial designation provides areas for small-scale neighborhoods serving retail and office uses located in clustered development. 1. LUG-4 of the Comprehensive Plan recommends providing neighborhood and community scale retail centers for the City's neighborhoods. Staff Comment: The Neighborhood Commercial designation is consistent with the surrounding neighborhood. There is public transportation route along both Park Road and Broadway Avenue adjacent to the proposed amendment. 2. LUP-4.1 of the Comprehensive Plan encourages the integration of retail developments into surrounding residential areas. Staff Comment: The Neighborhood Commercial designation will allow the introduction of a variety of commercial uses that would service the surrounding residential neighborhood. D. PUBLIC FACILITIES Findings: The property is currently served with public water and sewer. Park Road and Broadway Avenue provide access and are designated as Minor Arterials in the Arterial Street Plan (Exhibit 5). E. FINDING AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO PUBLIC COMMENTS Findings: Staff has received no public comment concerning the proposal to date. Conclusion(s): Adequate public noticing was conducted for CPA-01-10 in accordance with adopted public noticing procedures. F. FINDING AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO AGENCY COMMENTS Findings: Staff has received no agency comments to date. Conclusion(s): No concerns are noted. StaffReport and Reeommendation to the Planning Commission for CPA-01-10 Page 5 of 7 IV. OVERALL CONCLUSION The proposed Comprehensive Plan designation to Neighborhood Commercial and change in zoning classification to NC is consistent with the Comprehensive Plans policies and goals. V. STAFF RECOMMENDATION The Planning Division after review and consideration of the submitted application and applicable approval criteria recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of CPA-01-10. VI. PLANNING COMMISSION FINDINGS The Planning Commission is required to adopt findings of fact(Sections 17.80.140)when recommending changes to the Comprehensive Plan. At the conclusion of the hearing for the Comprehensive Plan amendments, the Planning Commission, by separate motion,should adopt findings of fact. Findings: Staff has prepared the following findings for the Planning Commission in the event there is concurrence with the recommended approval. Section 17.80.140 (H) of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) provides approval criteria that must be considered when the City amends the Comprehensive Plan. Planning Commission Findings and Factors(Section 17.180.140H of the SVMC): Findings b. The public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment is furthered by ensuring economic diversity and a better balance between jobs, housing and support of the City's desired quality of life. c. The proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan are consistent with Chapter 36.70A RCW (Growth Management Act). d. Commercial and industrial development is prominent to the south and southwest of the property. The property has been vacant in the current zoning classification of Single-family Residential District(R-3)for several years, The proposed amendment will allow for small-scale retail and office uses serving the single-family development to northwest and southeast. e. The proposed amendment does not correct a mapping error. f The proposed amendment does not address an identified deficiency in the Comprehensive Plan, however expanding the neighborhood commercial designation would allow for additional small- scale retail to serve the neighborhood. Factors: a. Pursuant to Title 21 (Environmental Controls) of the City of Spokane Valley Municipal Code, the lead agency has determined that the proposed amendment does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. b. The proposed amendment is a non-project amendment and will not affect open space, streams, rivers, and lakes. c. The proposed amendment is contiguous to neighborhood commercial, heavy industrial, and low density residential properties. Any potential impact to adjacent properties will be addressed during the development of the property and can be mitigated with design and development standards. d. Future development of the site may impact traffic in the area. At the time of development, an additional SEPA review will be required to evaluate the impacts of increased traffic. e. The proposal is consistent with the character of the neighborhood and will provide a wider array of commercial uses serving the neighborhood. f The proposed amendment will not increase population densities and does not demand population analysis. Staff Report and Recommendation to the Planning Commission for CPA-01-10 Page 6 of 7 g. The proposed amendment is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and will have minimal impact on other aspects of the plan. Recommended Motion: The Planning Commission finds CPA-02-10 to be consistent with Section 17.80.140 (11) of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC). The Planning Commission adopts the findings in the staff report and recommends approval of CPA-02-10, a change to Neighborhood Commercial with a subsequent zone change to Neighborhood Commercial(NC). Staff Report and Recommendation to the Planning Commission for CPA-01-10 Page 7 of 7 Exhibit 1 : Comprehensive Plan Map ..'l;on lilciu,lr ilii loo . Law Density Residential g7 ,..,W F E if 3 0 co .41 l_{p54' i)erlSll}' Itesi41c9yi..l Cataldo Cataldo MI - Centennial Middle 1 .h3-1, ()lieniNplicC c211 t y z l.aw Den's t, Resi�lr�itla CPA-01-10 P Low Density Residentidll wa y Broadway Broadway N l;i '1 hJloa:! t'►{H itt1111- iII t J i 4+1 Mil - - 1 , NI CPA-01-10 Request: Change the Comprehensive Plan map City of Spokane Valley designation from LDR to NC; subsequent zoning Community Development Department change from R-3 to NC. Exhibit 2: Zoning Map = 11=# x a. _ _ 2't-J Cataldo Cataldo _ — -'I F-1. 1 CPA-01-1O L .., .:_ . _- --7 --- _1 A Broadway Broadway _, Broadway 1 .d' R-,i —.[-J ..A. 2 CPA-01-10 Request: Change the Comprehensive Plan map City of Spokane Valley designation from LDR to NC;subsequent zoning I Community Development Department change from R-3 to NC. Exhibit 3: 2008 Aerial Map ,p ,. _ — , --1 - -- - i 'F 1.6 .. ,' ..„ _ _ Fie ii -''d'''g. L � i 1 ," -1. _' _ , k A' . k 1 1 1:.a. "�tatal'I.. • f ■ a • �!i 1 y - - a �"" ,— �� r Centenniall. 14F� 1, 1::1 ,:4 _Middle te, . . .....tv ,-!, r _. ,,„ _ F I I)V u 1 1 , I li r-rm . irk. ',-,:'.1 ' i,ris.-3/4,,, •, 11 'ru t 71-x' 0# CPA-01-1.0:.,, , - ,_, , , , .„ , _.L. , ,...., .,,,,,,,, .i.__,...,_, ..., „.,_ , ....9„,... _._......„, ,,_ ,,.,,,, 1 ,,,,, _ , . , , _.. ., 14,..., ..,,,, _____;„ . ,,,,..„.,,, ,_ ..... 1 Alii---4, ,o, . . . ., - f ,,I , -i.• .rill - tier , -.4&Aiwa Li ,it ...r;.-wir-.,, - ,••_.,,,A,. . .,- ,„0„0- • ,,,,,,.,,,, l- i .,°5 ` 4 , "fir- 1 I , i, �� r r ---' . 1i' F,g. 1 1 t ■1 4 y4.-..f- 5 1 r rye r 'r M .. I r 1,1V11), ,. - , 4`.: , I , , k V CPA-01-10 Request: Change the Comprehensive Plan map City of Spokane Valley designation from LDR to NC;subsequent zoning Community Development Department change from R-3 to NC. w Exhibit 4: Vicinity Map 5 Cataldo Cataldo Centennial Middle P.1: E. .i Pool c _ � y CPA-01-10 Broadway Broadway Broadway, II CPA-01-10 Request: Change the Comprehensive Plan map City of Spokane Valley designation from LDR to NC; subsequent zoning Community Development Department change from R-3 to NC. Exhibit 5: Transportation Map iair S nag Sharp ca CBoone— Boone Rooue - Sc) i . , C7 ..-77 — ,90 c; Cando CThdo Centennial Middle 2 i - ; - , r. , CPA-01-10 2 1! ._Id: 1 Broadwa da 3}_ 1 1 a vo Legend Current Classification — - State or Federal _ _ Principal Arterial • Minor Arterial --- Collector ••. - Proposed Principal Arterial •- • Proposed Minor Arterial - •• - Proposed Collector 1 -r CPA-01-10 Request: Change the Comprehensive Plan map City of Spokane Valley designation from LDR to NC;subsequent zoning Community Development Department change from R-3 to NC. Exhibit 6 Application Submittal CITYOFo111 l -�'` Spane Valley PART I - APPROVAL CRITERIA SVMC 17.80.140 establishes the following approval criteria for Comprehensive Plan amendment proposals. Proposed amendments must meet all applicable criteria to be considered for approval. The City may,approve Comprehensive Plan amendments if it finds that: 1. The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to the public health, safety, welfare and protection of the environment; 2. The proposed amendment is consistent with the requirements of RCW 36.70A and with the portion of the City's adopted plan not affected by the amendment; 3. The proposed amendment responds to a substantial change in conditions beyond the property owner's control applicable to the area within which the subject property lies; 4. The proposed amendment corrects an obvious mapping error; and 5. The proposed amendment addresses an identified deficiency in the Comprehensive Plan. PART II - MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS g Completed Application Form Application Fee SVMC 17.80.140 cites the following specific factors that must be addressed in order for Comprehensive Plan amendments to be approved. On a separate sheet of paper describe amendment in relation to the following: f F- 4-17,1t. ) 1. The effect upon the physical environment; 2. The effect on open space, streams, rivers and lakes; ' 3. The compatibility with and impact on adjacent land uses and surrounding neighborhoods; 4. The adequacy of and impact on community facilities including utilities, roads, public transportation, parks, recreation and schools; 5. The benefit to the neighborhood, city and region; 6. The quantity and location of land planned for the proposed land use type and density and the demand for such land; 7. The current and projected population density in the area; and 8. The effect upon other aspects of the Comprehensive Plan. MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR MAP AMENDMENTS g] One (1) copy of a narrative describing the following: &jam Pif YC ) 1. State the reason for the Comprehensive plan Map Amendment. 2. Describe how the proposed change(s) meet the approval criteria contained in Part I of this application packet and adopted by SVMC 17.80.140. xi One (1) copy of a completed State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Environmental Checklist, including the Non-Project Action supplemental form. (Note: Any previous environmental documents that are relevant to this project should be included and may be adopted by reference.) ANNUAL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT PROCESS Page 2 of 5 REVISED 04/21/09 *Wane L/ #E-0 Valley. 2 PART III- APPLICATION 1NFORMATIOI 4 { j 81Y ] MAP AMENDMENT ❑ TEXT AMENDMENT A ` (CHECK ONE) geVliaini‘ritzW. l/L e/r t APPLICANT NAME: r} MAILING ADDRESS: 1 2- • Pt' f 5 W./ f- (201 CITY: STATE:Viffl. ZIP: 49.2 PHONE: FAX: CELL: EMAIL: Ci elvireM t , C' ""NOTE:IF APPLICANT IS NOT THE LEGALO WNER,INCLUDE WR1 TYENAUTHORIZATION FROM OWNER"' "& - OF ave ite ! /4, ( C,t ,D LEGAL OWNER: 04 aC 5C Pa2r,07060-• MAILING ADDRESS: !f cf S * 0 CITY: •" STATE: ZIP: aie'J< PHONE: FAX: CELL: EMAIL: PROPERTY LOCATION: 11 . 'e ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.: 45/ 0-2. ' {[i'iC) oally CURRENT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: CURRENT ZONING CLASSIFICATION: c,. PROPOSED ZONING CLASSIFICATION: ?: BRIEFLY EXPLAIN THE REASON FOR THE MAP OR TEXT AMENDMENT: f lam-f-`s ANNUAL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT PROCESS Page 4 01 5 REVISED 04/21/09 I0/30/2009 11:50 FAX 5032224812 FEDEX KINKOS NW 23RD gl 002/002 OWNER AUTHORIZATION STATEMENT J.JOSEPH F.GUARISCO,as personal representative of THE ESTATE OF JOE AND IDA M. GUARISCO,hereby authorize HEADWATERS DEVELOPMENT GROUP LLC and its agents and consultants to file and process an application for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Zone Reclassification for the property located at 806 N.Park Road,Spokane Valley, Washington,Tar PfirrP1#AS1 R?90117,frnm l,nm rlAneity F?°t;rlPr+rip}m NP�n1.h'w-.. i Commercial. • • Dared this day of October,2009. THE ESTATE OF JOE AND 1DA M. GUARISCO JO. ot." F.GUARISSCO,personal representative 110: N. Sherwood Spokane WA 9920) STATE OF W.A-SifilkieTON ) orecon )ss. County of Spokane ) t .%nett-IC- I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that JOSEPH F. GUARISCO personally app I)ciuit um, and up (Nail atai ivai i,c was audowizzU W vw>rk.uke iiwc uiauuuivut clad acknowledged it to be his free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes rr ntioned in the instrument. DATED this Z 9 day of 04.• ,2009. CiFICOL CAL JNotary Public in and forte St te.of wycr1_ti0ltEl�IR mA"la"$t$ 0 o,residing at a.Efvtc4.^rc�r^ o. My commission expires J IQ., 20f3 2010 Annual Cornprehensive Plan SjÔkne Amendment Checklist & Application SVMC 17.80.140 Valley Community Development- Planning Division 11703 E Sprague Ave Suite B-3 • Spokane Valley WA 99206 509.688.0036 • Fax: 509.921.1008 • planning®spokanevaltey.org The City of Spokane Valley is accepting applications for map and text amendments to the Comprehensive Plan for the 2010 annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment cycle. The Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA) allows Comprehensive Plan amendments only one (1) time per year. Any interested person, organization, agency or business may submit suggestions, proposals, or requests to the City for changes to the Comprehensive Plan, including map and text. Notice — Each year, the City will provide notice of the annual amendment cycle at least sixty (60) days prior to the application deadline via display ads in local newspapers, email to interested parties and on the City's website. Procedures 1. Pre-application Meeting (Required, SVMC 17,8O.14O(c.1)) 2. Application Period —Applications are due by November 1st of each year to be considered during the next calendar year amendment cycle. Submittals received after the deadline will be considered during the next annual amendment cycle. 3. Staff Review and Report — Spokane Valley Planning Staff will review all applications and will prepare a report and recommendation to the Spokane Valley Planning Commission. The report will analyze how each proposal addresses amendment criteria established by Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) 17.80.140. All application documents and staff reports will be available for public review. 4. Notice of public hearings and public meetings will be provided to the public as set forth in the Spokane Valley Municipal Code. At a minimum, notice will be provided to surrounding properties within 400 feet for site-specific Land Use Map amendments at least fifteen (15) days prior to any public hearing. Notice will also be posted on-site at least fifteen (15) days prior to any public hearing. Legal notice will also be published in the newspaper. 5. Planning Commission Public Hearing —The Spokane Valley Planning Commission will conduct a formal public hearing on all proposed amendments. The Commission will consider amendments individually and will examine the cumulative impacts of all amendments collectively. The Commission will prepare one recommendation to the Spokane Valley City Council, including findings on each individual proposed amendment. 6. City Council Review and Decision — Within sixty (60) days of receipt of the Planning Commission's recommendation, City Council may choose to adopt the individual amendments as recommended by the Planning Commission, disapprove the amendments, or modify and adopt the proposal. If the Council chooses to substantially modify a proposal, they must either conduct a public hearing or refer the proposal back to the Planning Commission for further consideration. 7. Appeal Procedures — City Council decisions on Comprehensive Plan amendments may be appealed to the Eastern Washington Growth Management Hearings Board within 60 days of publication of notice of adoption, in accordance with RCW 36.70A.29O(2). 8. Staff Contact — Questions may be directed to Mike Basinger, Senior Planner ib, in erri? �.ef�al??eva ,crt.) or Greg McCormick, Planning Manager (gmccarnicko spokanevalleV.orr ), 509-921-1000. ANNUAL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT PROCESS Page 1 of 5 REVISED 04/21/09 Approval of the proposal will meet the referenced State-wide planning goals. The proposal is served by necessary urban services (public transportation, utilities, emergency services, roads, etc.), provides appropriate urban infill development within the City limits, encourages economic growth and employment, and is consistent with the Growth Management Act. Criteria 3: The proposed amendment responds to a substantial change in conditions beyond the property owner's control, applicable to the area within which the subject property lies. Applicant's Response: Although the proposed amendment does not respond to a substantial change in conditions in the area, the area continues to evolve in a manner that reinforces the appropriateness of the subject site as a Neighborhood Commercial use: recent construction of a medium-size industrial building across the street; designation of Broadway and Park as Minor Arterials, and intersection improvements that include full signalization; bridge/i-90 overpass improvements at Broadway and Park reinforcing their long- term use as major transportation resource; discontinued use of the subject site as a residential use; difficulty in selling the parcel as a residential site; and interest in the subject site for commercial use. Criteria 4: The proposed amendment corrects an obvious mapping error. Applicant's Response: The proposed map amendment is not in response to an obvious mapping error. Criteria 5: The proposed amendment addresses an identified deficiency in the Comprehensive Plan. Applicant's Response: The proposed map amendment is not in response to an identified deficiency in the Comprehensive Plan. Amendment Checklist & Application Form Part II - Minimum Submittal Requirements SVMC 17.80.140 cites the following specific factors that must be addressed in order for Comprehensive Plan amendments to be approved. Factor 1: The effect on the physical environment. Applicant's Response: A SEPA Checklist has been submitted as a part of this Application; however, a Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment is a non-project action under SEPA so a complete environmental review at this time is not practical. At the time that an actual project is identified and building permits are applied for, it is likely a project-specific SEPA Checklist will need to be submitted and reviewed to evaluate the impact of the project on the physical environment and mitigating measures, if any, implemented. Factor 2:The effect on open space,streams, rivers and lakes: Applicant's Response: There are no designated open space, streams, rivers or lakes in the vicinity of the site. ANNUAL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT PROCESS Attachment A NEC E.Broadway Avenue and N. Park Road Page 2 of 5 MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR MAP AMENDMENTS 1. Narrative describing the reason for the Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment: Applicant's Response: In looking for development opportunities, the Applicant became aware that the subject parcel was on the market. Due diligence and market analysis indicated that the site appeared well suited for a neighborhood commercial project: very good access from two minor arterials and a signalized intersection; close proximity to an appropriate number of residential units for convenience, as well as proximity to heavy industrial users; relatively flat site, available utilities and infra structure, etc. 2. Describe how the proposed change meet the approval criteria contained in Part I of this application packet and adopted by SVMC 17.80.140: Applicant's Response: See narrative above responding to each criteria. 3. One copy of a completed State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Environmental Checklist, including the Non-Project Action supplemental form: Applicant's Response: See attached SEPA Checklist, including Non-Project Action supplemental form. Supplemental Supporting Information General Comprehensive Plan Analysis: The Comprehensive Plan states that Neighborhood Commercial designates areas for small-scale retail and office uses with a guideline suggesting an area of approximately 2 acres which are organized in business clusters rather than in a strip configuration along an arterial. It provides for Neighborhood Commercial designation through Comprehensive Plan amendments, such as this application or neighborhood plan (Reference Section 2.5.2). The proposal is a 2.08 acre site and is directly across Broadway from an existing .3-acre Convenience Store. The resulting combined Neighborhood Commercial totals 2.38-acres. However, it is expected that required street right-of-way dedications to comply with the City's street design standards will result in a .17-acre reduction, bringing the proposed total Neighborhood Commercial designation to 2.21- acres, well within the tolerance of the stated 2-acre aspirational (but not required)guideline. Selected Comprehensive Plan goals and policies addressing Neighborhood Commercial include: 1. LUG-4: Provide neighborhood and community scale retail centers for the City's neighborhoods. Applicant's Comments: Expanding an existing Neighborhood Commercial designation is consistent with the goal of providing appropriately-scaled retail and office uses near an existing neighborhood. The proposal will cluster retail and personal services together to allow ease of pedestrian movement (LUP-4.3), and compatibility between the proposal and existing adjacent uses will be assured by compliance with the City's development standards(LUP-4.5). ANNUAL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT PROCESS Attachment A NEC E. Broadway Avenue and N. Park Road Page 4 of 5 Exhibit 7 SEPA Determination f ! COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Spoliane PLANNING DIVISION 11707 E Sprague Ave Suite 106 Spokane Valley WA 99206 509.921.1000 Fax: 509.921.1008 cityhall @spokanevalley,org DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE File Number: CPA-01-10 Description of proposal: Comprehensive Plan Map amendment to change the designation on parcel 45182.9010 from Low Density Residential to Neighborhood Commercial with a corresponding zoning change from Single-family Residential District (R-3) to Neighborhood Commercial (NC). This proposal is considered a non-project action under RCW 43.21C, Proponent: Headwater Development Group,LLC Location of proposal: Parcels 45182.9010; located on the northeast corner of Park Road and Broadway Avenue; further located in the south half of the northwest quarter of Section 18,Township 25 North,Range 44 East,Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washington. Lead Agency: City of Spokane Valley Community Development Department, Planning Division Determination: Pursuant to Title 21 (Environmental Controls) of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code, the lead agency has determined that this proposal does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). The threshold determination is available to the public upon request. DNS issued under WAC 197-11-340(2) Responsible Official: Staff Contact: Kathy McClung,Community Development Director Mike Basinger, AICP—Senior Planner City of Spokane Valley Community Development City of Spokane Valley Community Development Department Department Valley Redwood Plaza, 11707 E. Sprague Avenue, Suite Valley Redwood Plaza, 11707 E. Sprague Avenue, Suite 106, Spokane Valley, WA 99206 106, Spokane Valley,WA 99206 PH: (509) 688-00301 FX: (509) 921-1008 PH: (509) 688-00451 FX: (509) 921-1008 kmcclung @spokanevalley.org mbasinger @spokanevalley,org Date issued: February 5,2010 Signature:_ .�t ! 'L(. . APPEAL: An appeal of this determination must be submitted to the Community Develop;. nt Department within fourteen (14) calendar days after the date issued. The appeal must be written and make specific factual objections to the City's threshold determination. Appeals shall be in conformance with Section 17.90 (Appeals)of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code. At the time of appeal submittal, required fees are due pursuant to the City's adopted Fee Schedule. Pursuant to WAC 197-11-680, appeals shall be limited to a review of a final threshold determination. AGENCY ROUTING: City of Liberty Lake, Community Development City of Spokane, Planning Services Spokane County, Boundary Review Board Spokane County, Building and Planning Spokane County, Division of Utilities - Information Services Spokane County, Clean Air Agency Spokane County, Fire District No. 1 Spokane County, Fire District No. 8 Spokane County, Regional Health District Spokane Transit Authority(STA) Spokane Regional Transportation Council (SRTC) Washington State Department of Ecology(Olympia) Washington State Department of Ecology(Spokane) CPA- 02 - 10 Site-Specific Map Amendment Proposed Amendment: Comprehensive Plan map amendment from Parks/Open Space (P/OS) to Heavy Industrial (HI) with a corresponding zoning change from Parks/Open Space (P/OS) to Heavy Industrial (I-2) Staff Planner: Christina Janssen COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING DIVISION cres or n L po ane STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO THE Vlle� PLANNING COMMISSION a CPA-02-10 STAFF REPORT DATE: February 1, 2010 HEARING DATE AND LOCATION: February 25, 2010, beginning at 6:00 p.m,, Spokane Valley City Hall Council Chambers, Valley Redwood Plaza Building, 11707 East Sprague Avenue, Suite 101, Spokane Valley, Washington 99206. PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: City initiated site specific Comprehensive Plan map amendment on parcel 45114.9009 from Parks/Open Space (P/OS) to Heavy Industrial (HI)with a corresponding zoning change from Parks/Open Space (P/OS) to Heavy Industrial (I-2). This proposal is considered a non-project action under RCW 43.21C. PROPOSAL LOCATION: The proposed site is located on the west side of Sullivan Road,approximately 1600 feet north of Indiana Avenue; further located in the north half of the southeast quarter of Section 11,Township 25 North, Range 44 East,Willamette Meridian,Spokane County,Washington. OWNER: State of Washington 2824 N. Mayfair St Spokane,WA 99207-2051 APPROVAL CRITERIA: Chapter 2 (Urban Land Use) of the Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan, Title 17 (General Provision),Title 19 (Zoning Regulations), and Title 21 (Environmental Controls) of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC). SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Division, after review and consideration of the submitted application and applicable approval criteria, recommends that the Planning Commission approve CPA-02-10. STAFF PLANNER: Christina Janssen,Assistant Planner, Community Development Department REVIEWED BY Greg McCormick,AICP, Planning Manager, Community Development Department ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit 1: Comprehensive Plan Map Exhibit 2 Zoning Map Exhibit 3: 2007 Aerial Map Exhibit 4: Vicinity Map Exhibit 5: Transportation Map Exhibit 6: SEPA Determination 1. BACKGROUND INFORMATION APPLICATION PROCESSING: Chapter 17.80 Permit Processing Procedures in the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC). The following summarizes key application procedures for the proposal, Pre-Application Meeting: N/A Application Submitted: N/A Determination of Completeness: N/A Issuance of Determination of Non-Significance (DNS): February 5, 2010 Staff Report and Recommendation to the Planning Commission for CPA-02.10 Page 1 of 6 End of Appeal Period for DNS: February 19, 2010 Date of Published Notice of Public Hearing: February 5,2010 Date of Mailed Notice of Public Hearing: February 5,2010 PROPERTY INFORMATION: Size and Characteristics: The site is approximately 15.40 acres in size. The SEPA checklist states the site is generally flat. Comprehensive Plan: Parks/Open Space Zoning: Parks/Open Space (P/OS) Existing Land Use: Vacant SURROUNDING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN,ZONING,AND LAND USES: North Comprehensive Plan -- Heavy Industrial Zoning-Heavy Industrial (I-2) Existing Land Uses -Industrial South Comprehensive Plan-Parks/Open Space Zoning-Parks/Open Space (P/OS) Existing Land Uses -Spokane Valley City Park East Comprehensive Plan-Heavy Industrial Zoning-Heavy Industrial (1-2) Existing Land Uses - Central Pre-Mix gravel pit West Comprehensive Plan-Heavy Industrial and Parks/Open Space Zoning-Heavy Industrial (1-2) and Parks/Open Space (P/OS) Existing Land Uses-Vacant industrial land and Spokane Valley City Park 11. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO SEPA Findings: Pursuant to Title 21 (Environmental Controls) of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC),the lead agency has determined that this proposal does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). The Planning Division issued a Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) for the proposal. This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Conclusion(s): The procedural requirements of the State Environmental Policy Act and Title 21 of the SVMC have been fulfilled by the applicant's submittal of the required SEPA Checklist, and the issuance of the Citys threshold determination consisting of a Determination of Non-Significance (DNS). No appeals were received. Staff Report and Recommendation to the Planning Commission for CPA-02-10 Page 2 016 III. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT A. COMPLIANCE WITH TITLE 17 (GENERAL PROVISIONS) OF THE SPOKANE VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE Findings: Section 17,80.140 H. (Comprehensive Plan Amendment Approval Criteria) Spokane Valley Municipal Code 1. The City may approve Comprehensive Plan amendments and area-wide zone map amendments if it finds that(analysis is italicized): a. The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to the public health,safety,welfare, and protection of the environment; Staff Comment: The public health, safety, and general welfare will be promoted in accordance with standards established by the state and the City of Spokane Valley's regulations. b. The proposed amendment is consistent with the requirements of Chapter 36,70A RCW and with the portion of the City's adopted plan not affected by the amendment; Staff Comment: The proposed amendment is consistent with the Growth Management Act. Adjacent land use designations are consistent with the proposed amendment. c. The proposed amendment responds to a substantial change in conditions beyond the property owner's control applicable to the area within which the subject property lies; Staff Comment: The proposed amendment does not respond to a substantial change in conditions. d. The proposed amendment corrects an obvious mapping error; or Staff Comment: The proposed amendment corrects a mapping error e. The proposed amendment addresses an identified deficiency in the Comprehensive Plan. Staff Comment: The proposed amendment does not address an identified deficiency in the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The City must also consider the following factors prior to approving Comprehensive Plan amendments: a. The effect upon the physical environment; Staff Comment: Pursuant to Title 21 (Environmental Controls) of the City of Spokane Valley Uniform Development Code, the lead agency has determined that this proposal does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. The comprehensive plan amendment is a non-project action under SEPA. At the time of the submittal of the building permit application, an additional SEPA review would likely be required to evaluate the impacts of the use(s)and proposed structure(s) on the physical environment. b. The effect on open space,streams,rivers, and lakes; Staff Comment: The site is located approximately 350 feet north of the Spokane River, The proposed amendment will have no effect on the river. However, review of potential future impacts will occur when a building permit application is submitted. c. The compatibility with and impact on adjacent land uses and surrounding neighborhoods; Staff Comment: The proposed amendment is contiguous to both Heavy Industrial and Parks/Open Space designations. Any future industrial development would include landscape buffering between the Industrial use and the land designated Parks/Open Space. d. The adequacy of and impact on community facilities including utilities,roads,public transportation,parks, recreation,and schools; Staff Report and Recommendation to the Planning Commission for CPA-02-10 Page 3 of 6 Staff Comment: The City of Spokane Valley addresses adequacy of community facilities on a citywide basis through capital facilities planning. Policy CFP-9.1 of the Comprehensive Plan recommends a concurrency management system for transportation,sewer, and water facilities. The City of Spokane Valley's Parks and Recreation Plan outlines an implementation strategy including a capital facilities plan, which identifies costs and revenue sources for new parks. At the time of development, the proposed amendment may have an impact on transportation. At the time of the submittal of the building permit application, an additional SEPA review will be required to evaluate the impacts of the use(s) and proposed structure(s) on the physical environment in regards to transportation. e. The benefit to the neighborhood, City, and region; Staff Comment: The proposal would be consistent with the existing character of the surrounding parcels. f. The quantity and location of land planned for the proposed land use type and density and the demand for such land; Staff Comment: The amendment will correct a mapping error. There is no defined need for more industrial land;however, the amendment is consistent with surrounding land uses and designations. The current and projected population density in the area; and Staff Comment: The proposed comprehensive plan amendment will not increase the population density. The proposed comprehensive plan amendment does not demand population analysis. g. The effect upon other aspects of the Comprehensive Plan. Staff Comment: The proposed comprehensive plan amendment is consistent with the comprehensive plan and will have minimal impact on other aspects of the plan. B. COMPLIANCE WITH TITLE 19 (ZONING REGULATIONS) OF THE SPOKANE VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE Findings; Section 19.70.020 (Heavy Industrial District) Spokane Valley Municipal Code The Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment is from Parks/Open Space to Heavy Industrial and corresponding zoning map amendment from Parks/Open Space (P/OS) to Heavy Industrial (1-2). The Heavy Industrial designation supports intense industrial activities which include manufacturing, processing,fabrication, assembly, freight handling, and similar operations. Conclusion(s): The proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment is contiguous to other Heavy Industrial development. CPA-02- 10 is consistent with the intention of the High Density Residential designation. C. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The Comprehensive plan states that Heavy Industry is characterized by intense industrial activities which include, but are not limited to,manufacturing,processing,fabrication, assembly/disassembly,freight-handling and similar operations. Staff analysis is italicized. 1. LUG-10 of the Comprehensive Plan recommends providing well-planned industrial areas with parcel sizes adequate to allow for future development of industrial uses. Staff Comment: The Heavy Industrial designation is consistent with the surrounding parcels and the size of the parcel will provide for a wide variety of potential industrial uses. Staff Report and Recommendation to the Planning Commission for CPA-02-10 Page 4 of 6 2. LUP-11.3 of the Comprehensive Plan encourages appropriate buffering,landscaping, and other development standards for industrial areas. Staff Comment: When development is initiated, landscaping buffering would be required to buffer any industrial use from the adjacent Parks/Open Space land. D. PUBLIC FACILITIES Findings: The property is currently served with public water and sewer. Access is provided from Sullivan Avenue designated a Principal Arterial in the Arterial Street Plan (Exhibit 5). E. FINDING AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO PUBLIC COMMENTS Findings: Staff has received no public comment concerning the proposal to date. Conclusion(s): Adequate public noticing was conducted for CPA-02-10 in accordance with adopted public noticing procedures. F. FINDING AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO AGENCY COMMENTS Findings: Staff has not received any agency comments to date. Conclusion(s): No concerns are noted. 1V. OVERALL CONCLUSION The proposed Comprehensive Plan designation to Heavy Industrial and change in zoning classification to I-2 is consistent with the Comprehensive Plans policies and goals. V. STAFF RECOMMENDATION The Planning Division after review and consideration of the submitted application and applicable approval criteria recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of CPA-02-10. VI. PLANNING COMMISSION FINDINGS The Planning Commission is required to adopt findings of fact(Sections 17.80.140) when recommending changes to the Comprehensive Plan. At the conclusion of the hearing for the Comprehensive Plan amendments, the Planning Commission,by separate motion,should adopt findings of fact. Findings: Staff has prepared the following findings for the Planning Commission in the event there is concurrence with the recommended approval. Section 17.80.140 (H) of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) provides approval criteria that must be considered when the City amends the Comprehensive Plan. Planning Commission Findings and Factors(Section 17.180.140H of the SVMC): Findings Staff Report and Recommendation to the Planning Commission for CPA-02-10 Page 5 of 6 a. The public health,safety, welfare, and protection of the environment will be promoted in accordance with standards established by the state and the City of Spokane Valley's regulations. b. The proposed amendment to the Comprehensive Plan is consistent with Chapter 36.70A RCW (Growth Management Act). c. The proposed amendment does not respond to a substantial change in conditions. d. The proposed amendment corrects a mapping error. e. The proposed amendment does not address an identified deficiency in the Comprehensive Plan. Factors: a. Pursuant to Title 21 (Environmental Controls) of the City of Spokane Valley Municipal Code, the lead agency has determined that the proposed text amendment does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. b. The propose amendment is a non-project amendments and will not affect open space, streams, rivers, and lakes. c. The proposed amendment is non-project amendment and will not impact adjacent land uses or surrounding neighborhoods. Future development of the site will include an analysis of impacts and mitigation through use of design and development standards, d. The proposed amendment will not affect the City's capital facilities. Impacts to these facilities and the mitigation of impacts will be addressed at the time of development. e. The proposed amendment is consistent with the existing character of the surrounding parcels. f The proposed amendment will not increase population density and no population analysis is required. g. The proposed amendment is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and will have minimal impact on other aspects of the plan, Recommended Motion: The Planning Commission finds CPA-02-10 to be consistent with Section 17.80.140 (H) of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC). The Planning Commission adopts the findings in the staff report and recommends approval of CPA-02-10, a change to Heavy Industrial with a subsequent zone change to Heavy Industrial(I-2). Staff Report and Recommendation to the Planning Commission for CPA-02-10 Page 6 of 6 Exhibit 1 : Comprehensive Plan Map ii, t„.,mn un 4,. ti 1 Yr" I t,,. ll kill tip {11;,1g Tinilltail: MP OPEMMEMff iL IItl Milt{, Al IIIoi IP 4 APL .:..:s0 '0.11.7.3itier lshtil4:1 nag In nit ri'1 ;L'+t t.41-044:L. ' is d ' Y _ i l y�JJ ° _ .'Z,el iilL Lys ___----::----11--- ------ _- i I y 3' CPA-02-10 , __,e-le ...j.r.4. ,-. 11,11.4.1 l_ISC, • ________T__-___7,7,-+---- \ IP, "iie.:404 I A 0 PM.. limit I 4 k.. C -,_ J 2fk ' +„.L,z5 2t,t r;..14 ”' 7 r ' A 'c cc1unti #, � � F' 11 1 l t- D".. .'/ i=Ha, l n 5 Resident a r�' � r -,--" ~t _ SidoiS1 to y, r°, N l 7 h ear St . Sharp shirr-111g -� a < j: lo .H 'E 0 led, r :' LIC is i.E L' m .--r5 , . E. ..,14,41. 0......<::".7 ;,. I L.ou'l)ensiiv Residcritial ,..4----,.... , —we met— w 14II m. min E 7, medium Cataldo r Cat 1�o�+�G — °' _�].Ns4S f. �„ - R`esl€ePIit Sul I MEM I i i i -° M`li„„ Mallon '�I `Mallon Mall�n<- ' _,1, ,Ly}ll'��l� � ■ CLILLILI Ill 11 1 �. CPA-02-10 Request: Change the Comprehensive Plan map City of Spokane Valley designation from P/OS to 111;subsequent zoning Community Development Department change from P/OS to 1-2. Exhibit 2: Zoning Map 11 -11‘44411\,,e,... H A "4.1%.11[>14440 I.... c Ste Wu aorta s, w 1 t mimmiti4446. _,-----k--'111!( _._^ _ CPA-02-10 - 4 0 1 r , liii. ., „,..„. . ,. . _,, ,, .. ii, a. 6 40.1 �'/eta �;. -'''''''' '''„,0E-'''.. ', #:._.,e...•• 1- - 1 j1 r TIY W291 7,91 O� -4. � r � _ 7 ON OFF w 41 5: ` -� ,_vi t is X b 29 �0 -- -� _� 0 U. ___p s �irsi.r , 111 halp rir in ! . '_ h It - ]F E29.1 t I'gr,, F 7 iR ■ r y , O �� > 4 _ _ CPA-02-10 Request: Change the Comprehensive Plan map City of Spokane Valley designation from P/OS to HI;subsequent zoning Community Development Department change from P/OS to I-2. Fxhibit 3: 2008 Aerial Map 1 { 5. . I I , qr.� 1 i.:(- 4 �a _ - fir. . , \ ' II T 1 - I ;- - I h 1 ' 4 1 1101-2:1. 1 V II I I �1 c r —it ti[ .r f, OA e I f . I: i 4 .x7 r4... V. ./),...ri,* II � .,. 1T,'III __�4 - 6 � ., 1'_ll.� 4„ nt a F #e 4 I I I 1 cr ' i. ,� - - LF. ,,, ..it. PA-02-10 I ,, �. - , --- . :.----k" -'''... '-.. ' ,,,,,, . ,. _ 4 . , litsti, 4 J , -,,, 1 ., _ ,_ ______ _,. ,..,, , ., .,.. , L \, ` J - i \- x5 4 1, 1 h ', ',7 N'',P: , '" - . L 4t 4 Ey 4 1 a� y 1 ., ' S S% ' 1 Efi . - ' I - ., ,".." ,i - -f rf,.l J..)R - Jill r. - .t 11 .1 - 1 iiik,--. -'",r'a, - r 4. fr. -f I) 1 .+ • 116.%,41.::; .,„,,,* i _ r it e I d— `�„ A•j 5 �c '. 1i��7a�ib 1 I k y '' riMF, p,, . _ 1 ` CPA-02-10 Request: Change the Comprehensive Plan map ' City of Spokane Valley designation from P/OS to HI;subsequent zoning Community Development Department I change from P/OS to I-2, Exhibit 4: Vicinity Map / I 1 _MIIndustrial 1 g M Industrial Park D industrial Park D Li,. Park D F_. , F. ..?. ...,..:.,. ... . Z A 5 n rr c Industrial 'A a E . Park E Industrial Park E ' Euclid J I, Euclid-24 e. -o A Va .5 Fairview Fairview Euclid Euclid I v Ss Qtta va hS3ri Marietta Marietta Marietta 1[arietta-,,s0 tta ■ r_lq N ax c I /A° . CPA-02-101 1 ova o oa /11 a stilii C■1{rZgQ Q lip N`ii •19p 0xF 1g0��I90 - Flora Pit Al:111... P90 1-90 —lhdiana — -__ 4—�. �19p IP2g1 ±.-- Ind;\190 Lf.�� 0 M----/0 o I90 ° rssron l I9 4i'491-0N-`—E'91 ON .? Q-rii 1° I , , imLssaO , 0_� — Q m�r.7 W . �5,I �9i r 90 . ., ; •ff r� , Alison a APP h90_a N = �Sh= Sharp Sharp 11/882 M l• �.sissio4 E297 p a�_7.90.P�9o� 9lp�F d 1ana� m in s .- C ,, i♦ i♦♦ SSj°wr4 9 o i 5 ■inn ,7 r . l♦. �••rf l -� I'90 Igo �esmet _ v ., M M MM.= ? Lt sr 1 11111 IC A ∎..1 _ ". ! �- +=' U� I h ' 1. Mallon-J. p = a ■ c'n t alto l, Mallo Mallon'- 1a > 111 In MOUE ■.iiii ■■■iii— CPA-02-10 Request: Change the Comprehensive Plan map City of Spokane Valley designation from P/OS to HI; subsequent zoning Community Development Department change from P/OS to I-2. Exhibit 5 : Transportation Map ■-- i • I 1 1 N - -3 F---F I d - 1kf IMF i a- a, 0.■ Y til Industrial Park D 1_ _ r a 1 I i f i 3. + , 1 1 1 f IS--1— -12 U Industrial Park E �awhI —.iuclid c � ca r In 1 ''''''' -11111111,1 p airview Fairview e Euclid R i 4' co i U u �4ctiiet�? 111 o R O ad p uud"I raltiiu�!-9.f l.i , _� \ gi ....'""'"'' CPA-02-10 e ! r;A 1kLIIIIti s Il"„rI, . i . „< x 0 -9 ---„ror 1.94 ..\ —ti - , eillir61111 F lora Pit <.�ON 4 x90_ - �_ `_— . Legend 1 0F29.0� Nl.'291 0,\' 1-9.0 291 ON 191\V291011 ir fi Current Classification i�o 19p r f9�, State or Federal r.. �2�,0 19 \V291 + t�-vz. Iad,,i Iad,�na r Principal Arterial '� t�,$S..ot, FF � F 190 1 r MIN ■MM Proposed Collector _ 1 ::a /°. • I. E =1 N �♦ 1 ■�j - �.1 „, ■ Mallon Pout= •�. ��I:Mil Mallon EMI= ■■i�% ii. M■ , L■Iii CPA-02-10 Request: Change the Comprehensive Plan map City of Spokane Valley designation from P/OSto 1I; subsequent zoning Community Development Department ! change from PIOS to 1-2. Exhibit 6 SEPA Determination COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Scene PLANNING DIVISION Walley 11707 E Sprague Ave Suite 106 Spokane Valley WA 99206 509.921.1000 Fax: 509.921.1008 cityhall @spokanevalley.org DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE File Number: CPA-02-10 Description of proposal: City initiated site specific Comprehensive Plan map amendment on parcels 45114.9009 from Parks/Open Space(P/OS)to Heavy Industrial(HI)with a corresponding zoning change from Parks/Open Space(P/OS)to Heavy Industrial(I-2). This proposal is considered a non-project action under RCW 43.21C. Location of proposal: The proposed site is located on the west side of Sullivan Road, approximately 1600 feet north of Indiana Avenue; further located in the north half of the southeast quarter of Section 11,Township 25 North,Range 44 East, Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washington. Lead Agency: City of Spokane Valley Community Development Department, Planning Division Determination: Pursuant to Title 21 (Environmental Controls) of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code, the lead agency has determined that this proposal does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). The threshold determination is available to the public upon request. DNS issued under WAC 197-11-340(2) Responsible Official: Staff Contact: Kathy McClung,Community Development Director Mike Basinger,AICP—Senior Planner City of Spokane Valley Community Development City of Spokane Valley Community Development Department Department Valley Redwood Plaza, 11707 E. Sprague Avenue, Suite Valley Redwood Plaza, 11707 E. Sprague Avenue, Suite 106, Spokane Valley, WA 99206 106, Spokane Valley, WA 99206 PH: (509) 688-00301 FX: (509) 921-1008 PH: (509) 688-00451 FX: (509) 921-1008 kmcclung @spokaneva1ley,org mbasinger @spokanevalley.org Date issued: February 5, 2010 Signature: APPEAL: An appeal of this determination must be submitted to the Community Develop nt Department within fourteen (14) calendar days after the date issued. The appeal must be written and make specific factual objections to the City's threshold determination. Appeals shall be in conformance with Section 17.90 (Appeals)of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code. At the time of appeal submittal, required fees are due pursuant to the City's adopted Fee Schedule. Pursuant to WAC 197-11-680, appeals shall be limited to a review of a fmal threshold determination, AGENCY ROUTING: City of Liberty Lake, Community Development City of Spokane, Planning Services Spokane County, Boundary Review Board Spokane County, Building and Planning Spokane County, Division of Utilities - Information Services Spokane County, Clean Air Agency Spokane County, Fire District No. 1 Spokane County, Fire District No. 8 Spokane County, Regional Health District Spokane Transit Authority(STA) Spokane Regional Transportation Council (SRTC) Washington State Department of Ecology(Olympia) Washington State Department of Ecology(Spokane) CPA- 03 - 10 Site-Specific Map Amendment Proposed Amendment: Comprehensive Plan map amendment from Community Commercial. CC) to Heavy Industrial (HI) with a corresponding zoning change from Community Commercial (C) to Heavy Industrial (I-2) Staff Planner: Christina Janssen CO 1M[JNrnr DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLA I NNING DIVISION SktTS01 ane po STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO THE Valley PLANNING COMMISSION CPA-03-10 STAFF REPORT DATE: February 1,2010 HEARING DATE AND LOCATION: February 25, 2010, beginning at 6:00 p.m., Spokane Valley City Hall Council Chambers, Valley Redwood Plaza Building, 11707 East Sprague Avenue, Suite 101, Spokane Valley, Washington 99206. PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: Comprehensive Plan Map amendment to change the designation on parcels 45013.9104 & 45013.9105 from Community Commercial to Heavy Industrial with a corresponding zoning change from Community Commercial(C) to Heavy Industrial (I-2). This proposal is considered a non-project action under RCW 43.21C. PROPOSAL LOCATION: Parcels 45013.9104&45013.9105;The proposal site is located between Sullivan Road and Industrial park ls`in the Spokane Valley Industrial Park. It is further located in the west half of the southwest quarter of Section 01, Township 25,Range 44,East Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washington. OWNER/APPLICANT: Crown West Realty, LLC 3808 N. Sullivan Rd. Spokane, WA 99216 APPROVAL CRITERIA: Chapter 2 (Urban Land Use) of the Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan, Title 17 (General Provision), Title 19 (Zoning Regulations), and Title 21 (Environmental Controls) of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC). SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Division, after review and consideration of the submitted application and applicable approval criteria, recommends that the Planning Commission approve CPA-03-10. STAFF PLANNER:Karen Kendall,Assistant Planner, Community Development Department REVIEWED BY: Greg McCormick,AICP,Planning Manager, Community Development Department ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit 1: Comprehensive Plan Map Exhibit 2 Zoning Map Exhibit 3: 2007 Aerial Map Exhibit 4: Vicinity Map Exhibit 5: Transportation Map Exhibit 6: SEPA Determination L BACKGROUND INFORMATION APPLICATION PROCESSING: Chapter 17.80 Permit Processing Procedures in the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC). The following summarizes key application procedures for the proposal. Pre-Application Meeting: N/A Application Submitted: N/A Determination of Completeness: N/A Issuance of Determination of Non-Significance(DNS): February 5,2010 Staff Report and Recommendation to the Planning Commission for CPA-03-10 Page 1 of 6 End of Appeal Period for DNS: February 19, 2010 Date of Published Notice of Public Hearing: February 5, 2010 Date of Mailed Notice of Public Hearing: February 5, 2010 PROPERTY INFORMATION: Size and Characteristics: The site is approximately 12.19 acres in size. The SEPA checklist states the site is flat. Comprehensive Plan: Community Commercial Zoning: Community Commercial(C) Existing Land Use: There are two (2) industrial warehouse buildings located in the proposed project area. SURROUNDING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN,ZONING,AND LAND USES: North Comprehensive Plan—Community Commercial and Heavy Industrial Zoning—Community Commercial(C)and Heavy Industrial(I-2) Existing Land Uses—Commercial and Industrial South Comprehensive Plan—Heavy Industria[ Zoning—Heavy Industrial(I-2) Existing Land Uses—Heavy Industrial East Comprehensive Plan—Heavy Industrial Zoning—Heavy Industrial (I-2) Existing Land Uses—Heavy Industrial West Comprehensive Plan—Community Commercial and Heavy Industrial Zoning—Community Commercial(C)and Heavy Industrial(1-2) Existing Land Uses—Commercial and Industrial II. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO SEPA Findings: Pursuant to Title 21 (Environmental Controls) of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code(SVMC),the lead agency has determined that this proposal does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement(EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). The Planning Division issued a Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) for the proposal. This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Conclusion(s): The procedural requirements of the State Environmental Policy Act and Title 21 of the SVMC have been fulfilled by the applicant's submittal of the required SEPA Checklist, and the issuance of the City's threshold determination consisting of a Determination of Non-Significance(DNS). No appeals were received. III. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT A. COMPLIANCE WITH TITLE 17 (GENERAL PROVISIONS)OF THE SPOKANE VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE Findings: Section 17.80.140 H. (Comprehensive Plan Amendment Approval Criteria) Spokane Valley Municipal Code 1. The City may approve Comprehensive Plan amendments and area-wide zone map amendments if it finds that (analysis is italicized): a. The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to the public health, safety,welfare, and protection of the environment; Staff Report and Recommendation to the Planning Commission for CPA-03-10 Page 2 of 6 Staff Comment: The public health, safety, and general welfare will be promoted in accordance with standards established by the state and the City of Spokane Valley's regulations. b. The proposed amendment is consistent with the requirements of Chapter 36.70A RCW and with the portion of the City's adopted plan not affected by the amendment; Staff Comment:The proposed amendment is consistent with the Growth Management Act. Adjacent land use designations are consistent with the proposed amendment. c. The proposed amendment responds to a substantial change in conditions beyond the property owner's control applicable to the area within which the subject property lies; Staff Comment:The proposed amendment does not respond to a substantial change in conditions. d. The proposed amendment corrects an obvious mapping error; or Staff Comment:The proposed amendment corrects a mapping error. e. The proposed amendment addresses an identified deficiency in the Comprehensive Plan. Staff Comment:The proposed amendment does not address an identified deficiency in the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The City must also consider the following factors prior to approving Comprehensive Plan amendments: a. The effect upon the physical environment; Staff Comment:Pursuant to Title 21 (Environmental Controls) of the City of Spokane Valley Uniform Development Code, the lead agency has determined that this proposal does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. The comprehensive plan amendment is a non project action under SEPA. At the time of the submittal of the building permit application, an additional SEPA review would likely be required to evaluate the impacts of the use(s) and proposed structure(s) on the physical environment. b. The effect on open space, streams,rivers, and lakes; Staff Comment:The SEPA checklist states that there is no surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of site. c. The compatibility with and impact on adjacent land uses and surrounding neighborhoods; Staff Comment: The proposed amendment is contiguous to both Community Commercial and Heavy Industrial Comprehensive Plan designations. No potential impacts to adjacent properties are anticipated as the site is currently built out. d. The adequacy of and impact on community facilities including utilities, roads, public transportation, parks,recreation, and schools; Staff Comment:The City of Spokane Valley addresses adequacy of community facilities on a citywide basis through capital facilities planning. Policy CFP-9.1 of the Comprehensive Plan recommends a concurrency management system for transportation, sewer, and water facilities. The City of Spokane Valley's Parks and Recreation Plan outlines an implementation strategy including a capital facilities plan, which identifies costs and revenue sources for new parks. No additional impacts to community facilities are anticipated as the site is currently built out. e. The benefit to the neighborhood, City, and region; Staff Comment:The proposed amendment is contiguous to both Community Commercial and Heavy Industrial designations. No changes are anticipated as the site is well established and functioning in an industrial capacity. Staff Report and Recommendation to the Planning Commission for CPA-03-10 Page 3 of 6 f. The quantity and location of land planned for the proposed land use type and density and the demand for such land; Staff Comment:The amendment is being proposed to correct a mapping error. The site is located inside the Spokane Valley Industrial Park for industrial uses. g. The current and projected population density in the area; and Staff Comment: The proposed comprehensive plan amendment will not increase the population density. The proposed comprehensive plan amendment does not demand population analysis. h. The effect upon other aspects of the Comprehensive Plan. Staff Comment: The proposed comprehensive plan amendment is consistent with the comprehensive plan and will have minimal impact on other aspects of the plan. B. COMPLIANCE WITH TITLE 19(ZONING REGULATIONS)OF THE SPOKANE VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE Findings: Section 19.40.080(Multifamily High Density Residential District) Spokane Valley Municipal Code The Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment is from Community Commercial to Heavy Industrial and corresponding zoning map amendment from Community Commercial (C)to Heavy Industrial(I-2). The Heavy Industrial designation is intended to support intense industrial activities which include manufacturing, processing, fabrication, assembly, freight handling and similar operations. Conclusion(s): The proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment is contiguous to other Heavy Industrial development. CPA-03-10 is consistent with the intention of the High Density Residential designation. C. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The Comprehensive plan states that Heavy Industry is characterized by intense industrial activities which include, but are not limited to, manufacturing, processing,fabrication, assembly/disassembly, freight-handling and similar operations. Staff analysis is italicized. 1. LUG-10 of the Comprehensive Plan recommends providing well-planned industrial areas with parcel sizes adequate to allow for future development of industrial uses. Staff Comment: The Heavy Industrial designation is consistent with the surrounding parcels and the size of the parcel will provide for a wide variety ofpotential industrial uses. 2. LUP-10.2 of the Comprehensive Plan encourages a diverse array of industries to locate in Spokane Valley Staff Comment: The High Industrial designation being proposed will allow a variety of industrial uses to locate in Spokane Valley, and within the Spokane Valley Industrial Park, an established industrial area. D. PUBLIC FACILITIES Findings: The property has public water and sewer service. Access is provided from Sullivan Avenue designated a Principal Arterial in the Arterial Street Plan (Exhibit 5). Staff Report and Recommendation to the Planning Commission for CPA-03-1O Page 4 of 6 E. FINDING AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO PUBLIC COMMENTS Findings: Staff has received no public comment concerning the proposal to date. Conclusion(s): Adequate public noticing was conducted for CPA-03-10 in accordance with adopted public noticing procedures. F. FINDING AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO AGENCY COMMENTS Findings: Staff has not received any agency comments to date. Conclusion(s): No concerns are noted. IV. OVERALL CONCLUSION The proposed Comprehensive Plan designation to Heavy Industrial and change in zoning classification to I-2 is consistent with the Comprehensive Plans policies and goals. V. STAFF RECOMMENDATION The Planning Division after review and consideration of the submitted application and applicable approval criteria recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of CPA-03-10. VI. PLANNING COMMISSION FINDINGS The Planning Commission is required to adopt findings of fact(Sections 17.80.140) when recommending changes to the Comprehensive Plan. At the conclusion of the hearing for the Comprehensive Plan amendments, the Planning Commission, by separate motion,should adopt findings of fact. Findings: Staff has prepared the following findings for the Planning Commission in the event there is concurrence with the recommended approval. Section 17.80.140 (H) of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) provides approval criteria that must be considered when the City amends the Comprehensive Plan. Planning Commission Findings and Factors(Section 17.180.140H of the SVMC): Findings a. The public health,safety, welfare,and protection of the environment will be promoted in accordance with standards established by the state and the City of Spokane Valley's regulations. b. The proposed amendment does not respond to a substantial change in conditions. c. The proposed amendment corrects a mapping error. d. The proposed amendment does not address an identified deficiency in the Comprehensive Plan. Factors. a. Pursuant to Title 21 (Environmental Controls) of the City of Spokane Valley Municipal Code, the lead agency has determined that the proposed text amendment does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. b. The propose amendment is a non-project amendment and will not affect open space, streams, rivers, and lakes. Staff Report and Recommendation to the Planning Commission for CPA-D3.10 Page 5 of 6 c. The proposed amendment is non-project amendment and will not impact adjacent land uses or surrounding neighborhoods. The site is currently functioning in an industrial capacity. d. The proposed amendment will not affect the City's capital facilities. e. The proposed amendment is consistent with the existing character of the surrounding parcels. f The proposed amendment will not increase population density and no population analysis is required. g The proposed amendment is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and will have no impact on other aspects of the plan. Recommended Motion: The Planning Commission finds CPA-03-10 to be consistent with Section 17.80.140 (H) of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC). The Planning Commission adopts the findings in the staff report and recommends approval of CPA-03-10, a change to Heavy Industrial with a subsequent zone change to Heavy Industrial(1-2). Staff Report and Recommendation to the Planning Commission for CPA-03-10 Page 6 of 6 Exhibit 1 : Comprehensive Plan Map «3 ..1 v l l lfl ail —�_a g_ — I ensiti' ? 1-?'glielasit}111►'.i"nti N1 111 1 I 1 g °,ir jg_ itcs.41E1 i13i y ts'iollt'111€11[5triai 4411,\140, 441 R_ck�;el1_ c iii �r... 413 'Eel 1.. Sawa -- liNwIlliscratil IMMIENIMINIP _� _ _ _ _ - 6,11'_'1r4 1.r k i7 p _ �7 7, 5 }-yr �y��y�i y7�},I�, 1, __---- _ - - - i•-- - - �___lkl's�hlA ,d&'z, ]E.—.° I{iI�y�hi5 �lynkiLSl.9[JI.SIJ.v"x41 11 • j Ai ' In■u. trial }• li.+I, I I 1 �,ii.4 �,i. I{' 1.911$11k 6_11:Ittk lo i I erli.th it l-IN a5 11.11-t!iut L?`-LJ 1 f ly e;,7 CPA-o3-1.0 4 V,' i I ilp•,7 - z t it li[�"-y i�Yll afr ° :11a3i ,11�r!k4, :Iiigiii"i6_11,111., tr.il-A+ll pa °$I T :711 .,p x147,./7,,,t .1.&,..,,,J.,1 ' ''' . lkiiii 3rtiiiJ kit ., ii ill:t tv -BO b L IA 4--- , , w ' A 1 'w i�r _ww.,,..„___ _ i, -.r_. f _ , Jf. �� _ 4 _I 1e -..,„, „ ,,,. 4 0 11 4 1' 7i {If„l . A 23.1Krz457 - pct"'i o 1 I ,r y 1 i f - tt o p� yli 4 _ _ _L CPA-03-10 Request: Change the Comprehensive Plan map City of Spokane Valley designation from CC to HI; subsequent zoning Community Development Department change from C to I-2. Exhibit 2: Zoning Map � .. R,i<n `� __ � h —Rich a -. G. I 11-3 III°-I -i Rich c; Rich-,�,'-JRic c 1 F _ it ock well � _ ? 1 om � — i H I I it 3. -R-4 - ,_�. .- y — Trent Cre.n4 r6� r„i ,e DA 1l701113 lid-.It il,g y r pP „; .cq 0 1 CPA-03-10 i ETC 3 L // `` / rit7ld � rr l is litd �, S + I a_ 1JJr i[?'tlk1�=i ,4 ftla:m €1 3' �v Il�1 Ll tlls s' i I X 40 c s LL y w; I l 10A 11111111.:V11-1t:4 • , ill { 1wi �. 0 E ' __JIM. 1-1 I CPA-03-10 Request: Change the Comprehensive Plan map City of Spokane Valley designation from CC to HI; subsequent zoning Community Development Department change from C to 1-2. Exhibit 3: 2008 Aerial Map ...-----_-----1,...0 I ' Y --__- — $ - - _ - 4 ti i • . 7ri'tf tititiv. I a, I / A w I l 4 1 Ili 1� .II t .=-1..... 1ni _ w....j ', 9 W'L k 7----- 1 r13i:4tr111 Iaf ,,'?I-• R .} r ' Y d �r R-'''' n ' — 1 Ii I4 I' i L�_ p. F1__.-•1 I _ , M i.0 ' ' .ly, . I.11 * rl —* F" + 1a1.t r F M y' 11�'*" — ---- i i.. . ' :.,. 1 I. 404116; L'it . ' . I *i:1 iivi 7. .. . .„ ,"rte' ^' _ .=� �I c dl' I , .-1 111, II',..I ..L,-..f..'°`.` 15:'I 11.1,. r ,i ' • - - - - -,--. �— 1 :{I�I•Ili I �� I L �� .±t;p 1 -III J I — 4 ;�F '' _ CPA-03-14 �= - 1,a , ry.,�_.'.".Is 71 _ 1 4r ! , . . r..�Mr a.a-.��rk++aw'.i , � :g — - - - ` - - r �xa i lr -/ — . II I ! I �Ij1sf 1111,. tl'!.",. , I 1 j` .. � -- .-47 C �K 'l° ".�, •I_,Aa.- - 6:f...'- II (?..,..:::(4 — r pI� F - I4'0'''.. rtl .' '�.I:-i''' [�k $rf tier t. • - "�4'F' tt.`9 y-? I,. I _ � .� y... j I II L 111 1,3 , + r # M 1 .If II_ ` V1 , CPA-03-10 Request: Change the Comprehensive Plan map City of Spokane Valley designation from CC to HI; subsequent zoning Community Development Department change from C to I-2. Exhibit 4: Vicinity Map -r -t--s- r_ Lacrosse II 1 g E'. c I co Industrial Park A Industrial Park A • 5 %F C. C F n Kiernan Industrial-P.ark.B Industrial Park B Industrial Park B Iv g N , Le CPA-03-14 a a ea 7 'C /41: '6' Industrial Park C Industrial Park C ti 7 .-.. N • x a a. V Industrial Park D Industrial Park D 1 II c ti ri C. w n I El y�y d V~I ro C V. Industrial Park E Industrial Park E — c, To 1 Euclid Euclid r v u a w _, a " •E -o c 0 Nc11d�__ Fairview Fairview -49 ty • CPA-03-10 Request: Change the Comprehensive Plan map City of Spokane Valley designation from CC to HI; subsequent zoning Community Development Department change from C to 1-2 Exhibit 5 : Transportation Map I-- -X11---,—1— _-I=a,,o"sse j 1 U O. Industrial Park A Induunial Park A • 4 I I I 1 Kiernan Kiernan 1 industrial Park B Industrial Park B L 4,-- . v CPA-034 0 a. I 1 t I 1 I ---f 1 1 1 1 I a' rhi • a. Industrial Park C Industrial Park C a c�. v i c �I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11-.1. 1 I 1 1 i-,-1 v: r G c E c • Industrial Park D Industrial Park D c, 1 c V 4 1 1 1 1 ? I 1 1 I I 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 industrial Park E Industrial Park E Legend � �_ Current Classification i ' State or Federal - Principal Arterial on Minor Arterial - Collector i A. - • Proposed Principal Arterial • Proposed Minor Arterial 5 • -� -- - Proposed Collector 1 S Fairview Fairview o° �/ CPA-03-10 I Request: Change the Comprehensive Plan map City of Spokane Valley designation from CC to HI subsequent zoning Community Development Department change from C to I-2. Exhibit 6 SEPA Determination COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Spokane PLANNING DIVISION Valleyb 11707 E Sprague Ave Suite 106 Spokane Valley WA 99206 509.921.1000 Fax: 509.921.1008 cityhall @spokanevalley,org DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE File Number: CPA-03-10 Description of proposal: : City initiated site-specific Comprehensive Plan map amendment on parcels 45013.9104 and 45013.9105 from Community Comrnercial (C)to Heavy Industrial(HI)with a corresponding zoning change from Community Commercial (C)to Heavy Industrial(1-2). This proposal is considered a non-project action under RCW 43.21C. Location of proposal: The proposal site is located between Sullivan Road and Industrial park l51 in the Spokane Valley Industrial Park. It is further located in the west half of the southwest quarter of Section 01, Township 25,Range 44,East Willamette Meridian, Spokane County,Washington. Lead Agency: City of Spokane Valley Community Development Department, Planning Division Determination: Pursuant to Title 21 (Environmental Controls) of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code, the lead agency has determined that this proposal does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43,21C.030(2)(c). The threshold determination is available to the public upon request. DNS issued under WAC 197-11-340(2) Responsible Official: Staff Contact: Kathy McClung, Community Development Director Mike Basinger, AICP—Senior Planner City of Spokane Valley Community Development City of Spokane Valley Community Development Department Department Valley Redwood Plaza, 11707 E. Sprague Avenue, Suite Valley Redwood Plaza, 11707 E. Sprague Avenue, Suite 106, Spokane Valley,WA 99206 106, Spokane Valley, WA 99206 PH: (509) 688-00301 FX: (509)921-1008 PH: (509) 688-0045 /FX: (509) 921-1008 kmcclung @spokanevalley.org mbasinger @spokanevalley.org Date issued: February 5,2010 Signature: MCP,„ APPEAL: An appeal of this determination must be submitted to the Community Developm 1W epartment within fourteen (14) calendar days after the date issued. The appeal must be written and make specific factual objections to the City's threshold determination. Appeals shall be in conformance with Section 17.90 (Appeals)of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code. At the time of appeal submittal, required fees are due pursuant to the City's adopted Fee Schedule. Pursuant to WAC 197-11-680, appeals shall be limited to a review of a final threshold determination. AGENCY ROUTING: City of Liberty Lake, Community Development City of Spokane, Planning Services Spokane County,Boundary Review Board Spokane County,Building and Planning Spokane County, Division of Utilities-Information Services Spokane County, Clean Air Agency Spokane County, Fire District No. 1 Spokane County, Fire District No.8 Spokane County, Regional Health District Spokane Transit Authority(STA) Spokane Regional Transportation Council (SRTC) Washington State Department of Ecology(Olympia) Washington State Department of Ecology(Spokane) 2010 Proposed Text Amendments CPA-04- 10 Thru CPA-08- 10 Project Planner: Mike Basinger, Senior Planner, AICP COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING DIVISION SC17 ok ne �F ` �] STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO THE Va11ey PLANNING COMMISSION 2010 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TEXT AMENDMENTS II STAPP REPORT DATE:February 1, 2010 HEARING DATE AND LOCATION: February 25, 2010, beginning at 6:00 p.m., Spokane Valley City Hall Council Chambers, Valley Redwood Plaza Building, 11707 East Sprague Avenue, Suite 101, Spokane Valley, Washington 99206. PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: The 2010 Comprehensive Plan amendments include: CITY INITIATED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TEXT AMENDMENTS File Number Map or Text Summary of Amendment CPA-0440 Text Chapter 2-Land Use: New policy language will address development Map 2,1 agreements in association with site-specific comprehensive plan map amendments. Text edits will also integrate policy language to supplement existing goals to support acquiring open space,publicizing the community's heritage,and connecting neighborhoods. CPA-05-10 Text Chapter 3 -Transportation: Map 3.1,Arterial Street Plan,will display Map 3.1 the federal reclassification of Conklin Street(Urban Local Access to Map 3.2 Urban Minor Arterial) and Indiana Avenue (Urban Local Access to Map 3.7 (LASP) Urban Minor Arterial). Map 3.2, Bike and Pedestrian System,will display newly developed bike and pedestrian infrastructure. Map 3.7, Local Access Street Plan,is a new map identifying future access streets within the City of Spokane Valley to improve connectivity and emergency access. Text edits will integrate policy language to supplement existing goals to support linking facilities with non- motorized transportation routes,increasing the percent of total miles of bike lanes in the City,and encouraging fuel-efficient vehicles in the public transportation system. CPA-06-10 Text Chapter 4-Amendments will incorporate changes in the 6-year Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP)into the Capital Facilities Plan to ensure consistency. The Level of Service (LOS)table will identify the current six-year and twenty-year level of service analysis for all arterial intersections in the City of Spokane Valley. Amendments will also update the growth assumptions to reflect population allocation numbers approved by the Spokane County Board of Commissioners. New text will integrate policy language to supplement existing goals to support water conservation,recycling,limiting harmful chemicals,and education programs that result in local employment. CPA-07-10 Text Chapter 7 -Economic Development: Amendments will integrate Map 7.1 policy language to supplement existing goals to support local businesses,living wages,efficient practices,and clean technologies. Map, 7.1, Development Activity,will display 2009 development activity. CPA-08-10 Text Chapter 8- Natural Environment: New text will integrate policy language to supplement existing goals to protect the aquifer, groundwater,and priority habit species. Staff Report and Recommendation to the Planning Commission Page 1 of 6 ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: Pursuant to Title 21 (Environmental Controls) of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code, the lead agency has determined that the proposed text amendments to the comprehensive plan do not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. After a thorough review of the completed environmental checklist, the lead agency has determined that an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). PROPOSAL LOCATION: The proposal affects the entire City of Spokane Valley, Washington. APPLICANT: City of Spokane Valley,WA APPROVAL CRITERIA: Title 17 (General Provisions) and Title 21 (Environmental Controls) of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC). SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Division recommends that the Planning Commission approve the proposed text amendments to the adopted Comprehensive Plan. STAFF PLANNER: Mike Basinger,AICP,Senior Planner, Community Development Department ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit 1: Chapter 2-Land Use Exhibit 2: Chapter 3 -Transportation Exhibit 3: Chapter 4- Capital Facilities Exhibit 4: Chapter 7-Economic Development Exhibit 5: Chapter 8- Natural Environment Exhibit 6: SEPA Determination Exhibit 7: Agency Comments and Public Comments BACKGROUND INFORMATION A. APPLICATION PROCESSING Chapter 17.80 Permit Processing Procedures in the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC). The following summarizes key application procedures for the proposal. A. .lication Submitted: November 1, 2009 Determination of Comsleteness: November 1, 2009 Issuance of Determination of Non-Si:nificance DNS): Februa 5, 2010 End of Appeal Period for DNS: February 19, 2010 Date of Published Notice of Public Hearin:: Februar 5, 2010 Date of Mailed Notice of Public Hearing: Februa 5, 2010 Staff Report and Recommendation to the Planning Con fission Page 2 of 6 B, SUMMARY OF TEXT AMENDMENTS II. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO SEPA Findings: Pursuant to Title 21 (Environmental Controls) of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC), the lead agency has determined that this proposal does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). The Planning Division issued a Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) for the proposal. This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Conclusion(s): The procedural requirements of the State Environmental Policy Act and Title 21 of the SVMC have been fulfilled by the applicant's submittal of the required SEPA Checklist, and the issuance of the City's threshold determination consisting of a Determination of Non-Significance (DNS). No appeals were received. III. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS A. COMPLIANCE WITH TITLE 17 (GENERAL PROVISIONS) OF THE SPOKANE VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE Findings: Section 17.80.140(H) of the SVMC provides approval criteria that must be considered when the City amends the Comprehensive Plan, The criteria are listed below along with staff comments. 1. The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to the public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment; Staff Response: The Washington State Growth Management Act limits the City to amending the Comprehensive Plan to once a year. The City provides a process each year for individuals, groups, City departments, and elected officials to propose updates to address changing conditions so the plan will reflect ongoing work or new information. The proposed text amendments add or modify policy direction in specific policy areas and update information in the plan. The 2010 proposed text amendments are minor in nature and ensure that the Comprehensive Plan is consistent with other internal plans within the City. The public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment is furthered by ensuring the Comprehensive Plan is reflective of regional policy and current with other internal plans. 2. The proposed amendment is consistent with the requirements of Chapter 36.70A RCW and with the portion of the City's adopted plan not affected by the amendment; Staff Response: The proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan are not in conflict with Chapter 36.70A RCW (Growth Management Act) and do not result in internal inconsistencies within the plan itself. 3. The proposed amendment responds to a substantial change in conditions beyond the property owner's control applicable to the area within which the subject property lies; Staff Response: The proposed text amendments are not site or property specific. This approval criterion does not apply. 4. The proposed amendment corrects an obvious mapping error; Staff Report and Recommendation to the Planning Commission Page 3 of 6 Staff Response: The proposed text amendments will not result in changes to specific properties. 5. The proposed amendment addresses an identified deficiency in the Comprehensive Plan; Staff Response: The majority of the proposed text amendments either update or correct information contained in the plan. At this point, staff has not identified any deficiency in the Comprehensive Plan. Section 17.80.140(H) of the SVMC provides the following factors that must be considered when the City amends the Comprehensive Plan. The factors are listed below along with staff comments. 1. The effect of the physical environment; Staff Response: Pursuant to Title 21 (Environmental Controls) of the City of Spokane Valley Municipal Code, the lead agency has determined that the proposed text amendments do not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. 2. The effect on open space,streams,rivers, and lakes; Staff Response: The proposed text amendments are policy oriented and non-project amendments. 3. The compatibility with and impact on adjacent land uses and surrounding neighborhoods; Staff Response: The proposed text amendments are policy oriented and non-project amendments. 4. The adequacy of and impact on community facilities including utilities, roads, public transportation, parks,recreation, and schools; Staff Response: The City of Spokane Valley addresses adequacy of community facilities on a citywide basis through capital facilities planning. The Comprehensive Plan recommends a concurrency management system for transportation, sewer, and water facilities. The Parks and Recreation Plan provide an implementation strategy including a capital facilities plan, which identifies costs and revenue sources for new parks. 5. The benefit to the neighborhood, City,and region; Staff Response: The proposed text amendments add or modify policy direction in specific policy areas and update information in the plan to ensure consistency with other internal plans within the City. The public benefit is furthered by ensuring the Comprehensive Plan is reflective of regional policy and current with other internal plans. 6. The quantity and location of land planned for the proposed land use type and density and the demand for such land; Staff Response: The proposed text amendments are policy oriented and do not address land quantity or land use designations. 7. The current and projected population density in the area; and Staff Response: The proposed text amendments are policy oriented and non-project amendments. The proposed amendments do not demand population analysis. 8. The effect upon other aspects of the Comprehensive Plan, Staff Report and Recommendation to the Planning Commission Page 4 of 6 Staff Analysis: The proposed amendments are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and will have minimal impact on other aspects of the plan. Conclusion(s): The proposed Comprehensive Plan text amendments are consistent with the approval criteria and factors contained in the SVMC. IV. STAFF RECOMMENDATION The Planning Division after review and consideration of the proposed amendments and applicable approval criteria and factors recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of CPA-04-10 through CPA-08-10. V. PLANNING COMMISSION FINDINGS The Planning Commission is required to adopt findings of fact(Sections 17,80.140)when recommending changes to the Comprehensive Plan. At the conclusion of the hearing for the Comprehensive Plan amendments, the Planning Commission,by separate motion,should adopt findings of fact. Findings: Staff has prepared the following findings for the Planning Commission in the event there is concurrence with the recommended approval. Section 17.80.140 (H) of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) provides approval criteria that must be considered when the City amends the Comprehensive Plan. Planning Commission Findings and Factors(Section 17.180.140H of the SVMC): Findings a. The public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment is furthered by ensuring the Comprehensive Plan is reflective of regional policy and current with other internal plans. b. The proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan are consistent with Chapter 36.70A RCW (Growth Management Act). c. The proposed text amendments are not site or property specific and do not respond to a substantial change in conditions beyond the property owner's control applicable to the area within which the subject property lies. This approval criterion does not apply. d. The proposed text amendments are not site or property specific and do not correct mapping errors. This approval criterion does not apply. e. The proposed amendment does not address an identified deficiency in the Comprehensive Plan. The majority of the proposed text amendments either update or correct information contained in the plan. At this point,staff has not identified any deficiency in the Comprehensive Plan. Factors: a. Pursuant to Title 21 (Environmental Controls) of the City of Spokane Valley Municipal Code, the lead agency has determined that the proposed text amendments do not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. b. The proposed text amendments are policy oriented non-project amendments and will not affect open space,streams, rivers, and lakes, c. The proposed text amendments are policy oriented non-project amendments and will not impact adjacent land uses or surrounding neighborhoods d. The adequacy of community facilities is determined on a citywide basis through capital facilities planning. e. The proposed text amendments are policy oriented and do not address land quantity or land use designations. Staff Report and Recommendation to the Planning Commission Page 5 of 6 f The proposed text amendments are policy oriented and non-project amendments. The proposed amendments do not demand population analysis. g. The proposed amendments are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and will have minimal impact on other aspects of the plan. Recommended Motion: The Planning Commission finds the 2010 Comprehensive Plan text amendments to be consistent with Section 17.80.140 (H) of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC). The Planning Commission adopts the findings in the staff report and recommends approval of CPA-04-10 through CPA-08-10, amendments to the comprehensive plan text. Staff Report and Recommendation to the Planning Commission Page 6 of 6 Exhibit 1 Chapter 2 - Land Use City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan 2.11 Goals and Policies Residential Goals & Policies Goal LUG-1 Preserve and protect the character of Spokane Valley's residential neighborhoods. Policies LUP-1.1 Maintain and protect the character of existing and future residential neighborhoods through the development and enforcement of the City's land use regulations and joint planning. LUP-1.2 Protect residential areas from impacts of adjacent non-residential uses and/or higher intensity uses through the development and enforcement of the City's land use regulations and joint planning. LUP-1.3 Review and revise as necessary, existing land use regulations to provide for innovation and flexibility in the design of new residential developments, accessory dwelling units and in-fill development. LUP-1.4 Encourage the development of transportation routes and facilities to serve residential neighborhoods. Special attention should be given to pedestrian circulation. LUP-1.5 Encourage the development of parks and the dedication of open space in and adjacent to residential areas. Open space dedication shall be proportionate to the size of the development. LUP-1.6 Preserve site characteristics that enhance residential development (trees, bodies of water, vistas, and similar features) using site planning techniques such as clustering, planned unit developments, transfer of development rights and lot size averaging. LUP-1.7 Allow zone changes within the Low Density Residential category only when specific criteria are met. Criteria may include: • Substantial changes within zone change area. • Clear mapping errors. • Adequate facilities and services (e.g. sewer, water capacity). • Consistency with densities in the vicinity of the zone change. l UP-i,8 Devcloprnent ]regm olts_in_coi junction with comprehensive plan amendments rr r be used where Itxe. �r2ject.fs lars�er in_sccpe and hips potentially larger impacts than normal, or where the city council may desire tg place cell& rest,icims on orsmaa, LUP.1_9 Development pgrgem nts in ccEdunctiori with comprehensive plan amendments shaif no be used(o waive requirements essoci0(00 With pra r ci.use_ Goal LUG-2 Encourage a wide range of housing types and densities commensurate with the community's needs and preferences. Policies LUP-2.1 Allow and encourage a variety of housing types in designated Mixed-use areas, especially in the City Center area. LUP-2.2 Use design and performance standards for residential developments to achieve integration in commercial and Mixed-use developments. Performance standards should focus on scale, appearance, and compatibility. Encourage variations in facades and rooflines to add character and interest to multi-family developments. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 12-31-2009) Chapter 2--Land Use Page 28 of 36 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan LUP-2.3 Encourage the development of transportation routes and facilities to serve residential neighborhoods. Special attention should be given to walking, biking and transit uses. LUP-2.4 Residential development should be designed to provide privacy and common open space. Open space areas shall be proportionate to the size of the residential development. LUP-2.5 Consider special development techniques (e.g., zero lot lines, lot size averaging, and planned unit developments) in single-family areas, provided they result in residential development consistent with the quality and character of existing neighborhoods. LUP-2,7 Comer and_possibly implement program*, facilitating.purCh se or retention of exdetinp pr7en s> ace lands. such as transfer of development ridleits I"i DR of purchase of development rights (PlDR Commercial Goals & Policies Goal LUG-3 Transform various commercial business areas into vital, attractive, easily accessible mixed use areas that appeal to investors, consumers and residents and enhance the community image and economic vitality. Policies LUP-3.1 Encourage transformation of Sprague Avenue Regional/Community Commercial corridor into a quality mixed-use retail area. Retail development along the corridor, exclusive of the City Center, should be concentrated at arterial intersections and designed to integrate auto, pedestrian, and transit circulation. Integration of public amenities and open space into retail and office development should also be encouraged. LUP-3.2 Encourage large bulk retailers to locate in the designated Regional Commercial nodes around arterial intersections. LUP-3.3 Development afireernents in conjunc t on with corTrprehenslye can an e+71menls May be used to ensure cornpatibilitv betMangajmidentiel developments and residential zones ix/reaulalinr7 helpht, scale, Setbacks, and buffers Goal LUG-4 Provide neighborhood and community scale retail centers for the City's neighborhoods. Policies LUP-4.1 Integrate retail developments into surrounding residential areas with attention to quality design and function. LUP-4.2 Encourage pedestrian and bicycle access to neighborhood shopping and services. LUP-4.3 Encourage retail and personal services to group together within planned centers to allow for ease of pedestrian movement. LUP-4.4 Encourage Mixed-use residential and commercial and office development in Neighborhood Commercial designations where compatibility with nearby uses can be demonstrated. LUP-4.5 Ensure compatibility between mixed-use developments and residential areas by regulating height, scale, setbacks, and buffers. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 12-31-2009) Chapter 2—Land Use Page 29 of 36 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan LUP-15.3 Establish and maintain relations with Native American tribes for the preservation of archaeological sites and traditional cultural properties. LUP-15A Publicize oomrnunity''s heritage through Interpretive trails, historic piacty . Eindsgtgirsuigokigus., Land Use/Transportation Connection Goals & Policies Goal LUG-16 Provide a street system that connects neighborhoods. Policies LUP-16.1 Encourage new developments, including multifamily projects, to be arranged in a pattern of connecting streets and blocks to allow people try sa _get around easily by foot, bicycle, bus,or car. LUP-16.2 Develop street, pedestrian path and bike path standards that contribute to a system of fully connected routes. LUP-16.3 Require adequate emergency evacuation routes prior to approving new development or redevelopment. 1.1JP-16.4 Connect neighborhood services. public oven space end harks with multi-modal Ott Joint Planning Goals and Policies Goal LUG-17 The City of Spokane Valley should continue to coordinate with Spokane County and neighboring cities for adjacent urban growth areas. Policies LUP-17.1 The City should coordinate with Spokane County to ensure appropriate service provision and land development prior to City annexation. Methods to allow for coordination may include, but are not limited to, execution of an interloca, agreement between the City of Spokane Valley and Spokane County to: • Establish guidelines for development plan review, impact fees and SEPA mitigation; and • Define service delivery responsibilities, level of service standards and capital facility implementation consistent with the goals and policies of this Plan. LUP-17.2 Through regional planning efforts, the City and County should ensure that planning is compatible with the Cities of Spokane and Liberty Lake. LUP-17.3 The City should continue coordinated planning efforts between Spokane County, appropriate fire districts, school districts, and water service providers to assure managed growth in urban growth areas. Potential Annexation Area Goals and Policies Goal LUG-18 identify Potential Annexation Areas for the City of Spokane Valley that are consistent with the Spokane County regional urban growth area boundary. Policies LUP-18.1 Within the existing urban growth area, identify potential annexation areas that are contiguous to the city limits and not assigned to another city. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 12-31-2009) Chapter 2—Land Use Page 34 of 36 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan LUP-18.2 Coordinate with adjacent cities and Spokane County to review and update the regional urban growth area boundary consistent with the Countywide Planning Policies and RCW 36.70. LUP-18.3 Propose changes to the regional urban growth area boundary necessary to accommodate Spokane Valley's 20:-year population allocation. LUP-18.4 The City will not accept requests to annex unincorporated territory located outside the designated urban growth area. LUP-18.5 Complete necessary capital facilities planning for any newly proposed urban growth areas in accordance with the Countywide Planning Policies. Goal LUG-19 Collaborate with adjacent cities, Spokane County, and affected residents. Policies LUP-19.1 Pursue interlocal agreements with Spokane County to support collaborative joint planning within potential annexation areas to ensure consistent development. LUP-19.2 Inform affected residents, property owners, and businesses in the annexation process. LUP-19.3 Include language in an interlocal agreement utilizing the tool of annexation, prior to urban development, to control the type, quality, and location of development in potential annexation areas. LUP-19.4 Coordinate with Spokane County to work with affected neighborhoods upon annexation to provide a smooth transition from Spokane County to the City of Spokane Valley administration. Goal LUG-20 Promote orderly growth within potential annexation areas. Policies LUP-20.1 Perform a fiscal analysis and provide a service plan for all areas proposed for annexation. Lup-20.2 Incorporate potential annexation areas in the Capital Facilities Plan including proposed locations for new capital facilities. LUP-20.3 Strive to retain neighborhood integrity in adjusting potential annexation areas boundaries. Goal LUG-21 Develop an annexation process for potential annexation areas Policies LUP-21.1 Evaluate annexations within the potential annexation areas based on the following criteria: • The City's ability, either in house, by contract, or by special purpose district, to provide public services at the City's adopted level of service • The annexation boundary should provide a contiguous and regular boundary with current City limits • The annexation boundary, where appropriate should use physical boundaries, including but not limited to, bodies of water, existing or future right-of-way, roads, and topography • Assessment of staff time and expense involved in processing the annexation request Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 12-31-2009) Chapter 2—Land Use Page 35 of 36 Exhibit 2 Chapter 3 - Transportation City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan TP-4.6 R edha the arraaunt of vehicle idling witl�ir� (he City Ihrc u th Irtltlaflletltatipt� of signal sVrschrrnizatan.a driver 8h £3reneSS. Transportation System Management (TSM) Goals & Policies Goal TG-5 Extend the functional life of the existing transportation system and increase its safe and efficient operation through the application of TSM strategies. Policies TP-5.1 Implement traffic signal synchronization projects as the primary component of a TSM program. As funding permits, monitoring or traffic operation should be carried out to assure efficient timing of traffic signals. TP-5.2 Use Access Management measures, such as placing restriction on left turns across major arterial streets to reduce accident rates and extend capacity of major arterials. TP'-5.3 Consider S#ra'te-s oaraterl railroad crossin is where a■propriate. TP-5,4 Ensure that pedestrians, bicycliMs.er d thw physically handicapped are taken intsi c n whe intersections. Transportation Demand Management(TDM) Goals & Policies Goal TG-6 Encourage all Commute Trip Reduction affected and voluntary employers in Spokane Valley to achieve the CTR Act travel reduction goals. Policies TP-6,1 Encourage car-and van-pooling, telecommuting, flexible work schedules and other strategies identified in the CTR to reduce overall travel demand. TF.,2 Use video-conferencIr end conference lllrrq fir # rneeiings where feasjble_ Freight &Goods Goals & Policies Goal TG-7 Provide for safe and efficient freight mobility. Policies TP-7.1 Discourage development of low-density residential development in close proximity to designated freight corridors and intermodal freight facilities, TP-7.2 Designate appropriate truck routes in the City of Spokane Valley. TP-7.3 Design designated freight corridors to improve traffic flow and freight mobility. TP-7.4_ Disperse traffic lhrr ussh®ut :ian ercial districts rather than concenttatIno it ors f� single arterial Goal TG-8 Adapt street and roadway design and facilities to manage traffic demand, address the need for freight movement, resolve traffic conflicts, and complement land use and urban features. Policies TP-8.1 Use the City's transportation system and infrastructure to support desired !and uses and development patterns. TP-8.2 Allow for variety of services within neighborhoods that are convenient to and meet the needs of neighborhood residents, decreasing the need for driving. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 3--Transportation Page 27 of 30 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Non-motorized Transportation Goals & Policies Goal TG-9 Enhance community livability and transportation by encouraging a connected system of pedestrian and bicycle ways that is integrated into a coordinated regional network. Policies TP-9.1 Encourage non-motorized improvements which minimize the need for residents to use motorized modes by providing: 1) access to activity centers; 2) linkage to transit, park & ride lots and school bus routes; and 3) designating a network of streets that can safely and efficiently accommodate bicycles_ 121J2 eePoordinate development of the non-motorized system with surrounding jurisdictions and regional system extensions. TP-9.r Provide sidewalks on both sides of all arterial streets as funding allows. TP-9 Incorporate pedestrian and bicycle features as design elements in the City Center. TP-9.'".4 Work with other agencies, particularly relating to regionally significant facilities to pursue funding for pedestrian and bicycle facilities. TP-9.6.5 Ensure that sidewalks, shared use paths and bike lanes are safe, clearly marked and well maintained. TP-9.76 include bicycle facilities where practical along arterial roadways. TP- -$ r'rgritize-sch000l.s, parks, City Center, !Ibraries artid r #her ciyctla tlnati ns non-motorized routes for Hie transportation network. TP-9.97 Include convenient and secure bicycle parking at major destinations and transportation centers. TP-9.109 Include pedestrian friendly facilities such as sidewalks(separated where feasible) in city street reconstruction and improvement projects, and require pedestrian friendly facilities v.:e as sidewalks and/or multi-use trails in all new development. TP-9.114 45 Reduce obstructions and conflicts between bicycle/pedestrian facilities and vehicular transportation routes. TP-9.1211. Develop street, pedestrian path and bike path standards that contribute to a system of fully connected routes far all transportation choices. TP-9.1 34azutLuc she+l a€Airde-Develpp an integrated Bicycle Master Plan that defines the goals and design elements for bicycling in the City. °fP-9.14 I rt a e ert cea o total miles of bike lanes in the CilV TP-9.1152 The deciclr..of. ter sti iotere4a s#a!t-aAccommodate bicyclists,and pedestrians and the physically handicapped in the design of interchanges, and intersections in a manner that 18 safe,accessible and convenient. TP-9.16.3 Te y-w4PwwWork with the CTR Program to provide incentive programs and develop facilities to encourage employees to bicycle to work. Transit Goals & Policies Goal TG-10 Support the provision of a safe, efficient, and cost-effective public transportation system. T ; Wort+ itb STA to ensure that transit shelters, bus benches and other amenities that support tranalt use are provided in appropriate locations for u s rFs of the sysjern, Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 3-Transportation Page 28 of 30 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan TP-10.2 Work with STA in blannin!. and Lievciu. ins sate and efficient bus, ioadin. and pnloadinn points, TP-10.3 Suigort the continued planning and ieveleemenl pf COOT trenSit Qpticina, including but not limited to a high-capacity transit system. TR1a4 Encourage L.16' Of fuel efficient vehicles in the public transportations +stern. Goal TG-11 Encourage land uses that will support a high-capacity transportation system. Policies TP-11.1 Ensure that street standards, land uses, densities and building placement support the facilities and services needed airing transit routes to make transit viable. ;ID--1-1,2—Work with STA tee molt- + itorc, bu..-`ban+chas and olWWar-omen-Wes yam tt,hal swport Irrins41 use ears etro ' ' -appropriatarl t -for- 1-ef-itie cy6torr°.. f P""J' -P-11.3 S u e -toe-sorb g-land-de lta# system. i P-14,41 ork with STA In planning and developing btis pull-out bays on the fart of i+4tiersr TP-11.62 Work with STA to faciiita e fOeighborhood business areas c oulc -?served by transit consistent with the Tr r 6port t!on Element. TP-11.62 Ensure that Appleway Boulevard right-of-way is the minimum width necessary to accommodate future street and high-capacity transit improvements. Aviation Goals & Policies Goal TG-12 Support the expansion of general aviation and freight uses at Felts Field in accordance with the approved Airport Master Plan. Policies TP-12.1 Encourage the full development and utilization of airport properties at Felts Field. TP-12.2 Encourage commercial, educational and logistical support industry in close proximity to the airport. Goal TG-13 Encourage land use and development compatible with airport uses and regulated airspace. Policies TP-13.1 Enforce regulations protecting airspace from encroachment. TP-13.2 Discourage incompatible land uses and residential densities adjacent to the airport. Rail Goals & Policies Goal TG-14 Support and encourage the continued viability of the passenger and freight rail system in the region. Policies TP-14.1 Participate with other jurisdictions to facilitate safe and efficient rail systems. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 3-Transportation Page 29 of 30 .101 d MOM gal'I more Ay of Spokane Iylt li9 i@ 1e iafilgi' ,0BR nor 5 a6Il l - �II� U*' r'52 " In I ' Its —'� i i;�� ,-- ' �rsi .e.1" al.,,, prallEME WO a_ji in likron = w ,v; l _ P ,rat ... \ L,..—kwtizii-as..2%,,, ,3-.4,741,iu.. Trma zz Illayilimiow,n_oliwIL.„ , ' Viii : �11i :T—r i n rpl2.. .r cf Map 3.1 Arterial Street Plan Legend Current Classification State or Federal Pnncrpal Arterial Minor Arterial Collector Proposed Principal Arterial Proposed Minor Arterial Proposed Collector """' Railroad Proposod Railynrd City of Spokane Valley Other Municipalities Urban Growth Area Water Bodies Effective Deie:XXIXXI)X 41..Ordinance No.-XX-X]Q( Map Location D 0 0.5 2 Miles I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 Akarar:id►•Jy1t■W l in utir.r n.r Lr, rxmVnfrON11n rrJIVW awwra.ra Newer ie n.rvee 41r aillramtrc eim. R1119.11.4 a akiltr Air aci.,cn,.u.irrrgr.y rfelgr pr.Ave at,cccielScilkdisecv kr.5rn{u ti.'.. l/,awe'term rr.a-11 mninntr r...pme Torrey.nt.r.v 1Mr rites/Sinutsri+An fey.eneare r.rn JYir4fvewnt1.45naswnl.iltwnzar njPir•erner..1050 N;!..:rex, rxarr.rrL.'I..li�yl.rs r.41wr.A1hoo'M1 lea' City or Spokane t M�n�rliah:r Bode') kirl?-E.l,.. lrrlranl At. gal. r'_nit•i„ 1 -h :CilyEoF -Liberty Lake 1 Can Dishman FT■l,c :AMA NNW Mna s Her Cnnacrv,fin■ Mariam.C(Inxcrvnlion Map 3.2 Bike and Pedestrian System Legend Bicycle and Pedestrian System - Shared Uso Path Proposed Sharod Use Path Bike lane ■•*- Proposed Bike Lane - Bike Lan&Proposcd Shared Use Path �4 Siznod Shared Roadway .�.� 4iLrncd Shared Roadway/Proposed Bike �_. Shard Roadway Pedestrian Path " Proposed Pedotrian Path Trcilheads Interstate 90 • Schools Railroad tI�J Other Municipalities I—I City of Spokane Valley 5 I Urban Growth Area Park, Water Bodies life-raw Da \''/C( Ordinance No.:ICX:CLK4), Map Location fn` tri' s�1 0 0.5 L 2 Miles I 1 I 1 1 1 J llN4•ThF Ltartlllfa11 JAW HW altr&hat ix pwl61YrIi4rar,ne• rurrds47411 4141:417 w L1WUL W xroirim 77r my weir,mr,San. 9/^RUNTIVNY 12141411 Mr mummy air c&ratter arya,inry 1141. gameclT dLrisre N&W ee S, at*Awl „H rmererf.. 4,49ppm r \'yr".NkiY W-f I Woo,(.n10414411, Elrati %L'ltYrx N.ca'S1 .It rif ribarpncr.OW.9:1-t.✓w R-3•.VreT CP,rt 5r'ls Yom}Ft@nniwww r',ammo_ Map 3.7 Local Access Street Plan Legend r■rn Platted Right-of--Way - Proposed f ocs1 Accts SrrccLs Railroads Streets City or Spokane Val Icy Other Municipalities Water Bodies Effective Dale:00/00/00 Ordinance Nn.:00-000 L Map Location 0.4 0.0 1.6 Mitm l .; l l l l AM, 7n,.r.•..we ecrynl pm!%%rano ts..e ..sh-wryfer +.`nwt 1hr f!{cwag!ro.Ywn, deed w+ANr mnr+.Qr!,rrnywrIirl Av ITU MI w,e 4.4...vve rn mot n. la.cfter.s.¢t,yrrn mcrHe^/ /// w rislrj•.Crxr.nnnn• .4.-.4wkilepnrstwie.ikriskstatlaintow.e?M J 3,I1-106.1 Exhibit 3 Chapter 4 - Capital Facilities and Public Services City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Public Safety - Fire and Police Goal CFG-3 Provide police protection efficiently and cost effectively to Spokane Valley residents. Coordinate with fire districts to ensure adequate fire protection and emergency services for Spokane Valley citizens. Policies CFP-3.1 Encourage inter-jurisdictional cooperation among law enforcement agencies and fire districts to further develop, where practical, shared service and facility use. CFP-3.2 Develop a comprehensive emergency management plan that meets the needs of the City and coordinates with regional emergency planning efforts. CFP-3.3 Require adequate emergency vehicle road access and water supply/pressure for new development within the City. CFP-3.4 Encourage property owners to create a defensible space between structures and adjacent fuels and require that fire rated roofing materials are used on buildings in forested areas. Water and Sewer Goal CFG-4 Plans for water and sewer service should be consistent with the SVCP. Policies CFP-4.1 Review water and sewer plans to determine consistency with anticipated population growth, future land uses, comprehensive plan land use policies and development regulations. CFP-4.2 Coordinate sewer planning with appropriate jurisdictions for consistency with the SVCP. CFP-4.3 Support continued planning for domestic water needs in partnership with water purveyors, the Joint Aquifer Board, Washington State Department of Health and the Washington State Department of Ecology. CFP-4.4 Encourage public and private efforts to conserve water and to r rgvic c public education re rding the safe and anncooriate use of the waste treatment systerrl i.e.. NOT 1,18inci drains and toilris forp?larma^eut'cals, nreasediapers, etc.). CFP-4.5 Discourage new, private domestic wells within the Spokane Valley City limits. CFP-4.6 New development must connect to public sewer and water. CFP_4.1 Consider grey water -use and [ inwp_ter harvesting technology when and re appropriate and feasible_ CFP-4.8 Encourage pse of less water-intensive, native vegetation wh reDis ible_ Solid Waste Goal CFG-5 Promote the reduction, re-use and recycling of solid waste. Policies CFP-5.1 Establish a City Hall recycling program to present a positive example of civic and environmental responsibility. CFP-5.2 Participate in updates to the Spokane County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management plan and support its implementation. CI i Work tt erd red joina waste al C]yy-s onsored events through the provision of rccycling canisters and other means. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 05-27-2009) Chapter 4 - Capital Facilities Page 9 of 72 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan CFP-5.4 Provide links to reduction. re-use and recyclinrt information on the City web site. CFP-5.5 Encourage the racKlinq of construction site waste, Stormwater Goal CFG-6 Ensure the provision of stormwater facilities and related management programs that protect surface and groundwater quality, prevent chronic flooding from stormwater, maintain natural stream hydrology, and protect aquatic resources. Policies CFP-6.1 Require stormwater management systems for new development. CFP-6.2 Create and implement a stormwater management plan to reduce impacts from urban runoff. CFP-6.3 Best management practices should be utilized to treat stormwater runoff prior to absorption of runoff into the ground. CFP-6.4 New development should include the multiple uses of facilities, such as the integration of stormwater facilities with recreation and/or open space areas, when possible. CFP-6.5 Encourage the use of alternatives to impervious surfaces_+rRR.lo ciiig permeable oayers.�enrlaus cavemen subsurface drarnage chambers and garden roofs. CFP-6.8 Consider Drogrsms dlmi4ll o the use of herbicides. t esticldes and fertilizers containing phosphates or other harmful chemicals. Library Service Goal CFG-7 Promote efficient and cost effective library service to Spokane Valley residents. Policies CFP-7.1 Encourage continued free, reciprocal library services among all libraries within the Spokane region. CFP-7.2 Land use regulations should allow siting of library facilities in locations convenient to residential areas. CFP-7.3 Work collaboratively with the Spokane County Library District to develop long- range library plans consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Schools Goal CFG-8 School sites and facilities should meet the education needs of Spokane Valley citizens. Policies CFP-8.1 Develop land use designations that allow new schools where they will best serve the community. CFP-8.2 Consider the adequacy of school facilities when reviewing new residential development. CFP-8.3 Assist school districts in their planning processes. CFP-8.4 Encourage educational and vocational institutions to develop programs that MI result in local emolovrtlent opportunities for graduates. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 05-27-2009) Chapter 4 - Capital Facilities Page 10 of 72 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan CI 1,4 5 Coordinate with school tlislrie.t t_use school facilities as community centers where auorojJriate._ Concurrency Goal CFG-9 New development shall be served with adequate facilities and services at the time of development, or within the time frame consistent with state law. Policies CFP-9.1 Implement a concurrency management system for transportation, water and sewer facilities. Financing Growth Goal CFG-10 Consider a variety of revenue sources and funding mechanisms including, but not limited to, impact fees. Policies CFP-10.1 Identify and pursue sources of revenue for financing public facilities. Essential Public Facilities Goal CFG-11 Collaborate with all Spokane County jurisdictions in determining the best locations for public and private essential public facilities. Policies CFP-11.1 Follow the process for siting essential public facilities as set forth in the Spokane County Regional Siting Process for Essential Public Facilities. Potential Annexation Areas Goal CFG-12 Provide capital facilities to serve and direct future growth within the City of Spokane Valley Potential Annexation Areas Policies CFP-12.1 Plan and coordinate the location of public facilities and utilities in the potential annexation areas CFP-12.2 Considering, in advance, property acquisition opportunities for future facilities including but not limited to parks, police facilities, stormwater facilities, greenbelts, open space, and street connections CFP-12.3 Coordinate with adjacent jurisdictions in developing capital improvement programs and studies addressing multi-jurisdictional issues 4,4 Capital Facilities Plan 4.4.1 Introduction The Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) provides an analysis of the facilities and services required to support the future land use and growth projected in the Comprehensive Plan. The CFP includes a six year capital projects and a financing plan for facilities provided by the City. The finance plan identifies specific revenue sources that the City reasonably anticipates will be available in the year the project is scheduled to be constructed. The CFP includes Level of Service (LOS) standards for each public facility or service and requires that new development be served by adequate facilities. The purpose of the CFP is to use sound fiscal policies to provide adequate public facilities consistent with the land use element and concurrent with, or prior to, the impacts of development. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 05-27-2009) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities Page 11 of 72 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan 4.4.2 Growth Assumption On November 30, 200,111ne $, ZOO. the Spokane County Board of Commissioners IBQCC) approved a Spekar`o O1a11 -population allocation of 20;0461$.,7,4.6 people fpr_the City of Ookane Valley, The allocation is the amount of people the City can accommodate within its current municipal boundary. In addition. l BoCC ai rove l population allocation of 8. 38 People for the unincorl oratgd Urban Growth Aram (UGAs) ediacent to the Citv of Spokane Valley. pokan Yalley. s ier&`lihic- rr T7ter m"iI t.?�'` -- __ = = = •• ='t CP1 'hty imioo $ rar lvcd. Because Sp'okenv-Valiay- -mat-r . - r' -- - i-.. . _ - - - - •, • h __ 2 r • r •_ - -r --P4A sly ed--in-chic-pion Thais° a-arza--kadef tho jurisdiat efl of Spokane County; '.` r r-e`-eTha City s f tokane Vatleu has icterffiffera the.ptgcerrt UG,gs as Paten tat AnnexatIon Areas (PrikAs , The CRY Odeitihed existing service providers to help (teterrni the_prig_c ri existing levels of service in the event of annexation. Capital facilities planning activities within these UGAs Nvklt-ooiihrivacontinue to be the County's responsibility. The following population data is used for capital facilities planning purposes: Table 4.4 Population Projection Year 04 '0:; a2 i5 242,61o31 Population .11-EL,- -20.09.44 0 1 *a9 54 145x478.146 4.4.3 Level of Service Cities are often defined by the quality of facilities and services that are provided to its residents. Good road, sewer and water infrastructure are typical criteria used by businesses considering relocation. Park and recreation facilities are increasingly used to judge the quality of a City. Businesses want to locate where they can attract the best employees, and quality of life issues are often the deciding factor for a person to move to a new area. Level of service standards are quantifiable measures, such as acres of parks per 1000 people, or the amount of time it takes to travel a road segment during peak morning and afternoon "rush hours," the higher the level of service the higher the cost. This element establishes levels of service which will be used to evaluate the adequacy and future cost of urban facilities and services. 4.4.3 Concurrency The Growth Management Act introduces the concept of concurrency, which requires new development to be served with adequate urban services at the time of development, or within a specified time thereafter. The GMA allows six years for necessary transportation improvements to be constructed as long as a financial commitment is made at the time of development. The GMA strongly encourages concurrency for water and sewer, and it is good public policy to require the same. 4.4.4 Financing Facilities and Services The City is limited in its ability to finance all desired capital facility projects. Options must be available for addressing funding shortfalls or decisions must be made to lower levels of service for public facilities. In deciding how to address a particular shortfall, the City will need to balance current needs versus future growth requirements; existing deficiencies versus future expansions. Capital facilities plans must be balanced. When funding shortfalls occur, the following options should be considered: a. Increase revenues, b. decrease level of service standards, c. decrease the cost of the service or facility, d. decrease the demand for the service or facility, Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 05-27-2009) Chapter 4 - Capital Facilities Page 12of72 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan e. or some combination of the above. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 05-27-2009) Chapter 4 - Capital Facilities Page 13 of 72 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan 3i10 5, 99ntcrcc.0laei► w01-o#-80w e-+4r40?yps4a I 400 Z044 .241.5 96 6-E kH4 f`Giki71 COMM! 2006 2.0.11. 'z$e �¢ i[r�k 2012 Ix LOS Lam. Li S 6OSI Pr 4c if -i #1 th J S INuen 2..;0.;. &Trard t E. - g - - I 2 iir1!'4;nra0 2025 4-4,4-1.44-u9 rs la r: - 4 41h.1 Urvver-ity 2 g I - G ' - 4 a3 In 1 Sew I} Q 2..wa dtcw p 1- ii • 8iri r Cishlnarl•1v1-¢a 20w1 -. - - • 44114.4.4orgcrzeld oa.v} xw.s-r-Eaep - - - a um s: LI c 14 1.4 4141-PIF 4 k 7} } awoiEpp. , - - - 1 4 $1i1.' trllivai} 2443 ;CIS+ i C - xx $31},1.T-1iigniiari nog .2-.981,4;130. P 4#1 -la 8111"+-lklrF4Wif1s44y PIgF101 1 'a 14 -1151J414-01emK dial t w:;j s.oci. L - ;I{. I fl! 7.-mar--r-oR I] ,cn.n.,,.�,i'aL. =f_i: �°r•"•v ._ _ G. F - ; `14 -1-61h-i-4 s-iwan-M16a Q.cio :.i..g,-L24 - 1. li 1 $ - }{ 3431 4•gviafgassi; �;- a';g.1G1 E- - - A - ZF 19th 1 M£t}vr-3ir4 .2DM 4.4413y r - G - - 44 14111.t iat .$19n:11 1 1 13 32.12 24 # # Ilv 04 gigfiel b r - as - - 2# 4-6,1-11 UiabiercIlp o >-ila sl li 6 4 - Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 05-27-2009) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities Page 43 of 72 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan "gahk]-445-Intarsa k LavO of- uvECO Anr;l •: 1 2167= 240.5 2011 04; 2'5.25 1{4 B 2042 1n-Mil/ k:in Goim.1 rrifi l i.' $ 461-HEa3erl W11.9740E1 1. «a 2411-i-1-cveetlf#e••ffi 0.00 -1I-4 a A E. 4 A H ac- 24 2'11h i 561 IIf an 264+ r$-r-s' $ Iii 24 Gantt 1 ktfHi}9 4 N--ew aj 6 C 4.: 2e ;244-S,3444i34 =1-3 * y&top fifi.16104•-1F COti,f1 - - $a ei;-r+eke-Elt 4-14 24.46 4 .r I H. r E. di $i' 43 1 o= 3 r 1p81>-lntirt-i4lrr;a .1-=-P R -. a�:>, F. n - h - - _6 42r1J 1 fv sN .'x i 2-44,01-4444 s 2 8 r6 43.d,LPar .. r�-S & r+al 11. i_. S - - Z:;4 ti all-1-14b#'t_r7. ie°Y G +@flsl 4. .. r - - 4.1 x siid4 841111vHfi 2.044 2-w-riy-rrtaa ,=1-1.,JNTY . 21.0."- - - ;:, eer- aqa=.. r Ms - -• v ,p,leliWayz 1,4a,ai 2 4.r, _ #r 9 4 A { OFr` 1413RiBi1 ,4ace S net f,iv;a as . .:p:liav+triy:l it 244i ;._. Z. ' - ■ pro try 1 Pork - 37 . p le 2705 &R..— - .- •:.p;E'psMy- irxl3 2144 _ - - M - 4-0 :f!-2rEway 1 Ad24;14 2424: 2-Niky-BEaf .: {3roodwny 1 P .Gii-;r_ Ei Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 05-27-2009) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities Page 44 of 72 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan to 4 a6 t@iaa Ilion-Leval.e-ao vl e-Analyale 205 2344 204 mini,, 2444 Intafsefliati 6etf it Geiikel 8 Pd ea ' € k IV & Qr dvezy-r.d veif en •65 Cig- P - z - l4 4-4 n1.DachklyiP3nCe1'iCiF rr4.4 4ig.ccu 6. F - I 2<b 44 r a#i�sBsaaal� aa05 $t ,�a: S a 4/ eamithA—Ay 1 Iuli:llsn 2994 Via; a a6 13 t€lway.1.Pack 2992 nisi . 1 .1p ' 49 2094 &anal I] - [: IL 8142 19 C F9 _ay-_ +Ilivan 2998 E al t w - e 44 4roadviny 1 Tirinrman 299 E-dy r. F - #-3 i Rd!•4ay--idnIV&:CAY 20E,z ,. A Iy aa Eli oadw:lylllab 3Eur z,- c+i =.. A a 84 lioo dway-1-W r1 a9v.- s. - 45 C8n9F31 Pm W11i4i 9092 n;-. a - - �.dllut1 illsa4 ;_,Ca I fi Dia4Fnari-Mlaa-I Id�;AGI: ,'Sc'is'ar IDOL 8 n. - - --t- 44 gueI i(•,• $wkor 3992 , V I9# 3 e a 2$r-.7a E-9 F=4 iill-as lli 1 gtirkmr 2042 2-:vay-s#o1-4 g F 9 C 2-2 :.n Ea,ic4i -Flare4r+erih} =•�a P_spy r.:, a _ - 44 44 -::!Id 1 f I®,a(souk 2443 2-441-44,4o 1 r. Z F °4114_Palk 3"_-hr. 2 sue;Si!TA. .- - 4-3 Cucild 1 Sullivan 3904 l s- Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 05-27-2009) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities Page 45of72 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan T 2iF # 2- ir# ous MJlIgala4i MI4114e-14 PrOjCi$ 1-0S2 603' * 44 , ii lta.1-FrtiP49 13+J - . q - - iiiJIz ri rvif34i•E'i:�'° - 11I h+idiaA0-1-41. 4NL;=I. {f - 1 Ply 4.1410144-P A -{026_ w� J r��}q1 S°�� ■ _ Q - i4 4Q IndigE -8Lilli4fi.r. •• - - - dl Pena 11a.rIgCS-ngv q2 (SR 27p °�' AR-g-1k1 F ...3 x 9,Ggfli il-H tii3i LT9.-3 -. L a - - 6.4i -Pky-i-1 1r IELL) 2-44y i` - 15 3,72,1 (gF1 271 agp.;.1.044 #i MiefrI4P+4-ARC 2n9f.i 9 =wc:10 - G - P4 IS€k94-4 F9£Jnnr 2E0 g P - r, - 4i IA4�-s L'4,',- , a 7 4 - F. - 6'i11P*5—`H1 i — 75 t.`_F,i:S.ri 1 f?n4S'1i Ft. . R_.. , G . - 4$ iylk.g.n4 Fgg-fBEfrf .. +^ - 4i MiE6:C'.+..t MI a7:11 - .. - Y.;F 44 f31 1 r Piiik • 1; -1* a.3 .M.95,174.' '.I . .. - Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 05-27-2009) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities Page 46 of 72 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan 7 h 446 terr;oottal I_-e et-G1—soN ae-Amilyelg 2-0 2.0-1?14 G 2.01 Iff gokwt £-G4 1 R4 L SAS IY}Fh J Pfnfu ct 4.08,7 1.06' - 1.1.tgtcri 11Jnlvert_I1y 4,004 r 1-„x wz-:. G s - f° 'y104[1430 Gil/ ArgorwPs 611nppInc ConlaF dC1Ci6 I a11vr l$arli gay i is 2 ma y A 49 ca - - 4 Piiw®rttllly b$ FPkdtt8f4-PaEl6 2.244 2 SU f['+]2 13 C. 4r - 410 Snauto/Sutll E i :. DA..61 HoP 0 ,. - i n— - Zit Sti:owI°I flppleway A w NW: $iyi.• ti - IF - 34 &3 S gj i+Al 34E9-i 15 2.044 .- is to - 04 Sp:1g L12 'L2341 4F 3445 4-442y} o- = t W. 24 Os Stu8 4 Elthvgli 0 2CO.5, &gF' l. _; g tprag Getea 1 raj 2 €+8H-. _ r 8,n-3a1FaJgi+FIC < illna sigaaF A o ;, - 1313 69-3-091.10 r Far! ac;--- B,gF..., A .,- A — spr ys. M;- 244.5 -. ,. c :;a Fitt J,:.. - L 4-4 Spraigus/Px14 zi-ig.: Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 05-27-2009) Chapter 4-Capital Facilities Page 47 of 72 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan -0 4-44-5+Foie-Fe errdo-. er.0-e - r tee-,anal-y-ts 21}1:17 2#' 2004 2pil aols 201 Y.ww}.r il Count t Mitigated MI «I L. 1 ,13,x,;:. ` 1.0.. r pines-(S c... cia, I MN svr$yua 1 Prpgrecc •5 4 Z ii a ai pax Sa' a ,I1 r ;;;;136 .6ia 1 t 3 - e at X98 ' .w,5 &I ::Nr 11 . 1 ar. i r$ity kV& & as! r# 6 - I .d 1 + tti a'soua 1 Vista nFV r , ll. trtQ)ir • '•rCoI(8R 2(10)J - . rrrl(SR 200}1 4" r ;anchor -i4 •iiici (SFi 204)t Plaioi ;I 2.Kzf E 07 r Hi &RV Treni'St 2D -144 ` m.-.7 £irtAF r F r L 221-11756 PilieS #& ?nu :via,sEea a - — - Ira# d4POW how- iK. y 205} e-nWy ESi;p F - R7v Trani(SR-1;414 8006 ?:]isr. $ - E.I. V zullevar.(North Ramp). 1-24 ag1;14 Trawl(SA 29U) G:,:: _ F 61 4.1.1 Cullivrsn(£outh Ramp) L 4,1a Tae r fi 04}-1 Yt 4 2993 4!7nni ,. - R are, 04 44*y 1 Evargrnen aQQ loo ay+a4 a. 4 - - Welle030y1Prcgross 2092 4 wad711161 G 6 a - 444 1 eI1 916}r r k14Ii\lds, ::r,: A nayoto9 F I F F 4r-40 Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 05-27-2009) Chapter 4 - Capital Facilities Page 48 of 72 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Table!.7444 oo-Lovoi ot.elan,Io Artatlys1s 201 1 2026 2GU4 X071 2{2 It1teFeeollexa Coutt Control 1; G IV41lI at rl Mli}+E l 0,0.1.5s, 117 E it 'Nita 4.36Inwrsectl_ortl lectiL 5k.- fc nl�Inil 1 2014 MI T69O-2016 toat 2GC1 2014 2030 I 111ItErt5l4rS�Lrl?t Cn�7trrl rdllJaaRae} Mittrjatoil fFr I.OF. LOS LOS L05 Los 1064110r; 4th l&lam% 20{}7 4•wu sie, A A A _ _ 411i 1 fl wrilsh 2A2Z 2J0JAY Sigh D D - E _ .. 4C@!€ldn EST-2r?OB 2•way s A A - A _ - I 41.1)l Disi man Mica EST-MI _4 r-a.1t,:1 C 0 - D - 41111 Evorureen ZNA -.,A s a, E E _ F _ - I - � 1 i f Farr .FST-21>09 2-LVaY s14a B B - B - _ 41!1 f FAG.1on,alo 2.♦ 7 Z.;tiYaY:E U C D _ F - - 41111 Park 200.0 2-way s1c B C _ F . _ Ail 1 SR 27 1=STr2[ @ s?' y WI] D D - E _ 41h/Sullivan .2201 kin I 0 B _ B _ _ 4thj,1 hlerman 20D'i £ ipif A A - B - - 1 - Athltiniirersity eSika Eml B B - B - - 8th/A ipm3 z •W r 4 Y§Itja A A .. A _ - _ .. 4kh 1 Barker 2_vv slue, B B _ C _ _ Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 05-27-2009) Chapter 4-Capital Facilities Page 49 of 72 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan TEI tA.4-3t,IHtEErcacdon Lewet of Service Alin tu•;irs 2014 2030 NM 2014 2030 jntareoctlOn Oun! Central LOS Mltlgafed LOS 1Nitigated . LCA LOS LOS , 81n Dattrroq ITT-200$ 2-wav aka(' C C - C - 8th.'t oitoMGP I it :20.tM :YsIY INR C D D D D 7'- i,1i,,fm n.i 8U1-32nd 81h it Carnahan r=,u.•: 4-way 5100 B B - F - h r IA/rnerl i lcr0 Simla] B B - B - - 8Ih f Evergreen 4JS3(1 I A A - A - - 8th 1 Farr j,'7 2-way s1oo B B - C - - 8th/McDonald 2007 2_way s?='p C D _ F _ - 8Ih f ParK 2008 :y+ty glop B B - E - 8Ih f SR 27 Q0• 2-way slop C D - E - - 9141,SvIliy t 007 $ic'r,'I B B - B - - I #1h 7 I Mamma I ST-2008 2_-vavw 65.).. ( C - C - b 81h L U111Mtrs_Vtht 2009 Slpnal A A - A -- _ AM.+Ad t11} 201a 4-wav MOO A A - A - - .nvd i&i!l 161h/Bowel5J2 nlOta ,1•,rd V 1d0 B C C D C aih-32nd I.:,: ;/Carnahan EST-2:.:1-.. 2-`,.r,r: .1;::;-1 B B - B - I 16111/DIslimarEMi4 000+4 Skinal B B - C - - 161h/Evergreen 2006 agnal A A _ A - Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 05-27-2009) Chapter 4 - Capital Facilities Page 50 of 72 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan l„1±4.32 lntergeation Level el Service"wallah. 1 lill 20 2014 2014 2030 2030 2010•2$1F 1nteraect!4r! COLIMMt Control '� LOS Mitigated L05 Mltinated prrr r3e X05 r L05 J of 161h 1 Mc17ol1a1l 24116 4-wav s90 A A _ C _ 1!.Ih/Plneg 21Xt atwav_Stag g E A F B TB[]..• 10th 1 Saltine ;55--201],k 2-waY st0o E; B B _ _ 2008 &anaal C C A g B MD-6 'QUI/Stutlly n t DW4 B B _ C z _ 16th/Uni rally 2009 Slanal B B _ C - _ h? dai 2047 4-way slog A A - A - L I a?.4tht/Blake 5T 13 4 4+t !'.FttQR A A - A - keetta 2.4113 10 21:` 2 ]t. c�2►" C C C C C 1WLTJam 8k11•3 Evergreen 24th t Rvergreen MU 4-wav atop A A A B A EajaLum d 24th/MGt?nrraltl aula_co kvqy VolD 8 B _ B _ - I 241h 1 Pines S7-2Q'j8 2•wav slag 13 B _ B _ - 241fil 'Rt 21 2001' 2-way stop C C _ E - 241h f Sullivan Mk ioai B C _ C - $4111 f Univers'tly EST-200 .,,, .r '.,,.o A A _ A _ 32nd/Bowdisli i';:5 Signal B B 13 13 8 - 2no!nlaharian Mina EST.20C 2•'0a4.sld, B 6 _ t3 _ _ I Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 05-27-2009) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities Page51 of 72 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan 'L1411_4.35 In s .re.Une:l,awel.I Sorel ee Ana vn I, 2014 2030 2014-2015 2005 2014 2030 Intsraaction Count Co giro! LOS r+Itfaated LOS Miti atE!r Protect LOS LOS id111414 32nd I =/ggeen -^- . .,9 9 ,?7,10Y 54P2 B C C C E _ 32nd/pima 2r.4,15 S:anal B B - 1 C - 32+741S€i27 S°'klnar B C - E ' - i 32nd f University 2005 Sion a[ B B - - 441/tif.aChf r EST-21%08 4.waystcp A 1 9 A - - I A[tl etway d Barker 2005 ftrikii D - F - APPlawav d.Dfshman N1j a :;: - Sl4nal B - B - - F r �::;�!. Si. nal A tY,.!_.dr., _ a _ A _ _ Argavu d 'ark §,. i'r-L B C 1 - - Apalew�y d'Thlermar, .-,i•' ' D D F - I A2121M LLUrlly=€he " fagli ai B B B _ I AppteVICAY /\JAM OJAI Signal. A A A 1 - - Blake/SR 27 EST-Z(.tU3 2-rionf slop B B - B - ItE105Ro.sti.Adams 2005 2-way slap D D - E ! - - Broadway 1Arotdnrr 221a Sir.:._: B B - 1; - - Broadway 1 Barker FST-20QQ 2, .AY.s k B B _ B I _ _ Broadway/Boyrdish = Simla' A A - A + - - P.M,.dyNly1S; rtkii!I ...1..:.:..; 2•veav stcl. C C - E - - Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 05-27-2009) Chapter 4 - Capital Facilities Page 52 of 72 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan e 3fijoarsocM n Level of Service Agattail 2014 2030 ;2144_2.614 28 2014 830 iteraaetkerr Caulk Coiatel LOS LOS Mitigated LOS Mitigated TOW LOS LOS Idonll Rsrg. Bra w aday d verar en ?0.05 S':nr=;71 D D _ D _ 1 _ Broadway LL angtz 2007 >iir3u1 C C _ A _ - 01-00.,:i y 1 Karr EaTzZaa 2-Willi$katt C C _ C _ - F:,: .IrI..ILx�tiii epondway 1 F4oii2 ^0O8 2-way'Sipe C F A F B h1. cr _t4 Flora Broadvtwatlatim 2009 21.wW.§1Q12 C C - D - - ,dw,�y 1 M cUan ak l .'::'; 4150a1 A A _ A _ Eireadway#Malign _-..... Signal B C _ D _ __ . parlf,Rood Vrood y 1 Park 2::::1) ,:i,:. .-� D D C F D dryltdWe13C Indiana preadwati'1 Plus ri;in_..I C C - C _ _ _ioar rev/St,lijy,ii1 __ _ :.I_,.e;l C C _ C - Broadway/Ulr?ly tsiil - _ I A A _ A - f _ Brojrdway r',Asia 21:12 ::e r:_I A A _ A 1 Braadw ..L WWIcy 2006 g,-yaYslup B B _ C _ Ouckeyra 1 Park EST-MB 2-wav stag A B - B _ i L Buckeye/Vista EST-2008 ,py slop B B _ B I I Dlshmai't Mica 1 Bowdlsh 2005 Sic1%i B B - C _ Euekld 1 Park 2005 2•wav slcp B B _ B _ I - I 1 +_ Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 05-27-2009) Chapter 4- Capital Facilities Page 53 of 72 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan [ _ Tanta 4,35In r .4c194r1 Loa!clf t .t t.A!iitlY 6 2 os 2014 2014 2030 M4 ,2 .0+,. 15 Intersection Count Cold l r,; L05 Mitigated L05 Mitigated Proloct LOS LOS Idaintlflor kuciid r uliivan 2000 ix/Auto - C _ klrcitd.West+Barfit<r 2004 2-my atop J3 B - _ - I I Euclid-Eas11 Barker Ei T-2I d 2.wa`t Mop t3 B _ B _ _ Euclid-West/Elam 2-+may x100 B B _ B _ - I EuO_ -, Flora 2007 2-way step B B - C _ Indira r Elam-rasa 2009 N.011101 B 13 - S - _ 1rldltano r Mlrabeao p09 Stu A B - B - Knox I Ariarlag 2ciw,, al nal c c - D - - Knox 1 VJsla EST-20C9 2-wAy Ka,,,• B B - B - - Mansfield I Mirabeau ?.QQ9 2 wav slop C C _ C - I tikElft.th Flrt 2000 Ignlli C C _ D - _ plrrteaLIIPines 2008 2-weV MCI F F A F B nst 11SlaarE®i Pkasian r Adam aQ.Q ,2-wav 6100 E} B _ B _ _ I Nlitasion i ura1ne 2006 Signal B B _ C , _ Mission #iOJLB 2 Ob 2 waw 590x7 B C _ F - ',1 rlIFlora ?JUS-' awP[,QP A F A F A IltdI rra Bxtenalan Mission f McDonalc 24)0 13 5irarlal A _ A - - PiltVigla illaglr.- 11 I, 2008 2-way slop B C - Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 05-27-2009) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities Page 54 of 72 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan T J}IL 4.3G Rlatan.EiLlluii I_Eon[of Burviuu NI:lynl& ;;9: 2014 a 2014 1 203 kQ1f1.-4018 aLg aclioll � Cunt Control 1.-.0 WS Mitigated LOS MIfloated prp!@C� LOS LOS ldordiflilr I.'': .:al)1 ?UIJ D 2E435 Signal B B - B - L - Er 913,4 Miukai.Psik 2`lO G =ic i' 0 C B D C Broadway; Indiana Mission 1 Pine a9O7 Signal 0 D _ E _ _ JvliBslcwn1 Stovall lilt!': Signa! B B B J _ ] Mission 1 Thlarrnari E$1.200@ ,?.way 8t4p B B _ B - J - MilticaUdtxraitY 200B 2-way stag C D - B - - Mission Conn,d Everarwer>. 2007 VEIRSI A A _ A _ _ MantoonteryIAI*fJ>anne 292.5 :iii!al D D D E D 1-90 tO Trani M4[].1$.gffl ilf,Dt f 1S ?mg?. Rou A C - I C , - MortkgontieryfU111versllY 203+ Ew3;,sigg C D - E - Rutter i Part; ZDSO ' yAtiRtn S B - C - - I S9Iterte I McDonald EST-2008 4-way s1ou A B _ E _ - I Saitese 1 Sunni rar? 710 a-4y u, C F B F B Install Signal Schafer I Dlshman Mica =0 Signal B B _ L - Soraauo f Adapts 2008 Signal B B - B - SZ.BauLAtuieway AM Sienai A B - B - Snracue/Fvoonne 21M Sinai B B _ B - - Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 05-27-2009) Chapter 4-Capital Facilities Page 55 of 72 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Moitinktosectio ti Love'of Seovl ca.Au ialye It 2008 2014 2014 2030 2030 ..•Lid_o-p1_1.!:,. IntareeCtion COIMI CepaIrol LOS LOS ' Miiinat° j - iii ated Pi oinil LOS LOS I 1 Sprague/fiar14% = 4-way s lee A F B F C jj I Wave/1 Rowdish 2008 "•aigiVi C C C ** _ I Sprague I Conklin 2g99 Ign. ! A A - A _ - 5,1211aus .12.12-en 20G6 S(..Ini.,j C C _C - _ Apragoe I Fanchter 2m aig• Lai D D _ D _ , Sprague I Farr ?OH Sloi%id A A A - _ All.M.101FIDL4 200,6 83onal B B D - - L : prilgue J!-00114.113 00 Rarnri ES1.21:08, Zap! A A A _ - - Prague/We onekt 2V.N Slfillri, C C D .* - 5pr..4x/k.i..II Mktil_a_r_i 2CLati Sig rm. B B VP - - I — _ Sprague i Parx ;1 : ::: (.:,! 1 B B - _A _ . .- SKE0-10,I1Pillgq 7:.. :: D D D •k _ - _ Sprague/Progress ". ,:i: Sic:-. i, B B _ - Sprague;Sullivan 2008 Signal D D E _I I - :$0raatjoi'Herman .11:2.7: 5,:..:-.:1' B B - B - L Sprague.i4 Univeratl 7.1.:: : Signal D p - Li A, a — - AlaraULLYINg '2110t. ,1`....;:. :i. B B - A - Tlifsma I Dishman Mica E2.11211 :''-. .: -L.i B B B _ - - Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 05-27-2009) Chapter 4 - Capital Facilities Page 56 of 72 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan I T.t11 4 3A l Cuorl l over ref Servl qe Malys I!- 2014 2030 :is i0-24:1 t'•: 2008 2014 2030 Int rraoctIon Ootttft Ctitilrol OS LOS Mitigated LOS Millmated fPr;a_1cct LOS LOS ..tfrinilrinr TltarpiM,1110141 r 2-tivaystee A A _ B Trent/Argonne 200 Signal D D _ E _ Trent/Barke F 2017 2_w ir/$;!;; D D F F!B West Trani - — TLTL Trent 1 Ever y rs n 2008 Simri.°.I B B I _ ii - BTV- 'gent 1 Flora 2L303 Y aLCIp E E _ F I F Eliminate NB 6'1_M r! rtit Trent i MCDQnDl4 2.Q 0Z 2-w ay atoll C D _ F - - ATV- Iren .200II i aa[ B B _ F B/C f illIglact17 Trent/Pines MN a17[E 15 C B - B - - -7-114 2(Fangs ?4.2 2-viay rton C C _ _ - Tren ,;iUvan-N Ramp 2007 5iCirral A A A _ _ Trani/.Suillvan-S Ramp 7G`u7 Signal A A - A _ _ eTV- Treat 1Trerit l llniversiiy ::::ail 2-v+'rev stov C C _ _ iarillLl Intersection i ren1 d Vista 2.00 fif,s.1. B B - B I Ytire Ie Iev [14 4-Slav M.,1 A B - B F - V+rclts lv I McDonald 200 4�FJav stOQ D E _ E - - Wellesley a Pro re_s§ .Zoor 4-way sttD I: S A C A L Gulch • a. 9rna WV1[ II]Ci Sabi, n 2007 4-way stop C C B D C r hlc..Iiislall $10:111 Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 05-27-2009) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities Page 57 of 72 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan I iltg z 1 1 a li i•vgi aIf s�i s r n A 1 .t1 is I 2 B 2014 2014 2 30 2030 010,2018 intersection oilLrai LOS Mitigated LOOS 'litigated PrvIe E LOS LOS r, rn'tr...; [ Sat Controlled Intersoctlons P:roGtxvay r Thierman 2009 Signal A A FIS i { -1roa¢wav f 1-90 WO Ramp .401.1 Signal A A _ A _ _ Broadway l 1.90 f&ELTEL 2009 S1oril B B B _ _ I edz onrre f 1-90 V+WB Ramo 208 Bait J' B _ C _ _ Arooni o i 1.90 EB Ramp 2008 Si;s ;` B B _ C _ _ MART)i 1.9Q VU ROIL :,ii:ii. B B - B - - I idIt .ri L.kW ER Re ,p 2008 Sirinat C C - C - - Indiana f Pines UtIZM .'3:toar 0 D - E - - Pines 1 I-`iiU F�•DTI•.tip 2..:i, c C E - E - - I Eymgeri 1-00 WE)Ram z0.5i `.-:3 . + C B - B - - Cvergreen I I-90 ER Rtiil2 kiiCi9 3iy.liai B B _ B _ •I l�talia.l;5,tiIFlY9n aly, Siena[ C D _ D - Sullivan f t-8Q B Ramp aCO ;`i ra B B C - _ Sulliyt yn}i•a"u Ear rump 2aCie, S"--- E E _ F _ Indiana 11-80 WB Rump aN gl Signal B B _ B - _ Causer!1.90 WEI Ramp EST-20013 Signal A E _ F - [ Fle rker f 1-90 RI Ramp J=ST.20 $ sp^:i' B D _ E _ _ Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 05-27-2009) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities Page 58 of 72 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan TuWFtu 41S Inre EauctiuII Lineal of;gr{ .Iru A!t$lvsiq 2014 2030 201e•2015 I oterwjka Couelt Control 2014 Mitigated 2030 Mitigated Prolocl ♦ OS LOS LOS ° S LOS Ittertitlnat. Note: See Tettte 428 Tor a lisllf DI reuilai iniprovermt WOWS, Includes volumes from Bigelow Gulch iivradjrei t - - - - - "'intersection n'Itr]tbv"Imt? tftsg-itY_ �? y xt lslrsr ptoi ct.htlt an fy is was not completed due to uncertainty of ROW - - - - - - - - "'Imeroverneel options are slill"ttilatUat2J t1iai; - - - - - Bridging trig Valley - - - - - - - - Regional Level of Service The Countywide Planning Policies require that LOS standards be adopted in accordance with the regional minimum level of service standards set by the Growth Management Steering Committee of Elected Officials. The Steering Committee approved the use of corridor travel time for use in establishing the regional transportation system. The Spokane Regional Transportation Council is determining annual average corridor travel time through a travel time study. This study is still in progress and corridor travel time Level of Service standards will be adopted upon its completion. Uses of Level of Service Standards As measures of transportation effectiveness, LOS standards can help jurisdictions identify where and when transportation improvements are needed, and when development or growth will affect system operation. Level of service provides a standard below which a transportation facility or system is not considered adequate. Level of service standards can be used to evaluate the impact of proposed developments on the surrounding road system. They can also be used to identify problems, suggest remedial actions and apportion costs between public and private sources. LOS standards are a cornerstone in the development of equitable traffic impact fee systems, which makes development pay some of the costs for improvements to the transportation infrastructure. The Spokane Regional Transportation Council (SRTC) performed traffic modeling for the urban area, considering future population growth and distribution. This model examines the performance of the entire urban transportation system. Improvements to provide for the increased traffic volumes shown by the model at the adopted level of service standards, are included in this plan. More information on the transportation modeling based on future land use assumptions is contained in Chapter 3, Transportation. Relationship to Concurrency Management Concurrency involves matching public facilities and new development. The concept of concurrency predates the Growth Management Act for some public facilities, specifically through SEPA mitigation requirements. The GMA extends concurrency to transportation facilities by requiring that new development be served by adequate roads and public transportation service, and that development is not permitted to cause these transportation facilities to operate below level of service standards that are adopted by local governments in their comprehensive plans. "Adequate capacity refers to the maintenance ofconcurrency° (WAC 365-195-835). Adopted April 25, 2006(Updated 05-27-2009) Chapter 4- Capital Facilities Page 59 of 72 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan State Transportation Facilities The Growth Management Act requires local jurisdictions to include inventory and Level of Service information for state transportation facilities in their Comprehensive Plans. State facilities are divided into two categories: Highways of Statewide Significance (HSS), and Regionally Significant Highways (non-HSS). The Growth Management Act requires non-HSS facilities to be subject to concurrency. The following table lists State highways serving Spokane County._State Transportation Level of Service The Washington State Department of Transportation Table 4.37 State Highways (WSDOT) requires state transportation facilities in urban areas (inside the UGA) to maintain a minimum Highway Description Designation Level of Service standard "D." In rural areas 1-90 Interstate IHSS (outside the UGA), the minimum LOS standard is "C.° Those areas lying outside the UGA that may SR-27 Pines Road Non-HSS have urban characteristics can be evaluated by the SR-290 Trent Avenue INon-HSS WSDOT in conjunction with the City on a case-by- case basis to determine which standard is the most f HSS=Highway of Statewide Significance Non-HSS= Regionally Significant Highway appropriate fit. Intergovernmental Coordination Transportation plans were distributed for comment to all jurisdictions that may be impacted by, or impact, Spokane Valley's transportation system, including adjacent towns and cities, Spokane County, Spokane Transit Authority, Washington State DOT, and Spokane Regional Transportation Council (SRTC). SRTC has overall responsibility for intergovernmental coordination of transportation plans. Each jurisdiction in the region must submit transportation plans to SRTC for inclusion in the Metropolitan Transportation Plan. SRTC responsibilities include: 1) Certifying the transportation elements of comprehensive plans adopted by the County, cities and towns in the region for consistency with the Metropolitan Transportation Plan; 2) Maintaining consistency between infrastructure plans and land use development plans, and 3) Reviewing LOS thresholds for transportation facilities in the Spokane Region. SRTC is also responsible for monitoring and evaluating the performance of regional transportation facilities as affected by land use and transportation improvement decisions. Concurrency management is linked to the planning process. Any amendments to the comprehensive plans require a concurrency management system analysis and must meet thresholds before their adoption. SRTC will annually assess the regional transportation system with respect to regional concurrency. Capital Facilities Projects and Financing Capital Projects Table 4.38 contains a complete list of transportation related capital projects for the years 2008 through 2013, totaling over $95 million. The City updates the six year TIP throughout the year as project priorities and funding changes. This Plan adopts by reference any updates to the TIP occurring between Plan update cycles. The current TIP is available for viewing online at www.spokanevalley.org. These projects address capacity issues at intersections and safety improvements. Following is a discussion of potential funding sources. Funding Sources Funding for the operation and expansion of the City's transportation system falls into several categories, which include federal, state and city funds. Some sources consist of reliable annual funds while others are periodic, such as grants. The use, availability and applicability of these various sources are not always at the discretion of the City. Spokane Valley will develop a track record with funding agencies as time goes on, which will help make to make more reliable funding assumptions. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 05-27-2009) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities Page 60 of 72 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan A summary of expected federal, state and local funding sources for the City's six year Capital Improvement Program is shown in Table 4.39. The following is a summary of transportation funding options. Federal Assistance These funds are authorized under the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act for the 21St Century (SAFETEA-21) and are administered by the Federal Highway Administration through Washington State Department of Transportation and the Metropolitan Planning Organization (Spokane Regional Transportation Council). Federal funding programs include Bridge Replacement (BR), Congestion Management and Air Quality (CMAQ) and the Surface Transportation Program (STP). State Assistance The Washington State Transportation Improvement Board administers State transportation programs, including the Urban Corridor Program (UCP), the Urban Arterial Program (UAP), and the Sidewalk Program (SP). City Funds Spokane Valley contributes revenues from the General Fund and the Real Estate Excise Tax funds for transportation projects. The City also receives State Motor Fuel Tax and Restricted State Fuel Tax. t4#-r. r.1lltis.> . ..;rt r ri,it;rI 1 P1 i, 2409 2e14 £t@f i 41-leki 4l1]ti;; 2008 Frr. Ff&i R r4Filafy Ity-A.44143LP'itt Total-Am uoi 801}15-0 14} AmIOU 4 griwielvikel, .. .: Park Rtkov ?4W 1-87 €4.3 Protect 4 191r7aef. anBfrod ❑rte 2-04a J,,7i @y 6ws L9(460 411 241 Tj' 0 3 Ap leway,S@fa i9cqMotirrsai; joa18-1i] t sir 9e+ra4 e= crmAG bi 3 Mica ITS 4 QTEP 4444 -1400 I $#4.014 ProaRrY.3E Ct 31 -Skceet0 eta 1 ti5 er y-Aveiaira -1-1 .I rO Ptcpi4 UAP 68 7 t lvca14iy t Easriraan &T.P SPOT--1dr ,1 1- wry E4Fg+iw;}ytAfgerppe;-Freya iic P I 2 46 401 kh Ave Pal lwta), Saiit218-Ia-Sa & 441 T' €j 44 1: laJee�ru� 4.4 ®F9adway-Averwe- chola lr2 rte, l;^ rliw4 Thierrnon Roa+y P(IM 42 gg, 4-2 P3rk RRoiti#2 iP� -u4-140 .• +H;1w -n.r.Tru Indra,1a. STP(iJ) 4 4-6 Sipt7ve twenuo Peaurfadng ::;y 11'a t SidafitAion {}+ I 2- = 2, o-11 Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 05-27-2009) Chapter 4 - Capital Facilities Page 61 of 72 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan 1.7 sv rr IflleFlaecl,PDrr-I 3:ti ;.i.! L 41 ' ACroan2Cdi'Spra r I tcrYsnticn FCC }' " Anrani&Tom Krne 141,439, Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 05-27-2009) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities Page 62 of 72 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan 64 F{,iii, -r. 12.414triry CI -44.4raiunt Totaa-/AlmtrE+l .. S$41+fee (4-.11 Ai1iorribt _ STEP-Rapp,.F.e{.I6 GDio 4/204 Sflecit Preservatic 1 Prc)e ct GIty 1.224 4/262 6 Br hw y—A e I G +i LAP 342 .,44-414 ,4pplErway-€#analon Uclverregy Lverifaara mgr 296 2,469 Net+ F MarieFcak# iEticicn fPEre^(SR 27) 41ka6ear+ i#cuy 247 144 -1 r- I s e, P 44 Park R,}.s,i dt91 gJnn Ihn *60 Viivey) 20 SpFagk+a R66wfacirig-PR I Etrar s43/4 4.]1 r City Zi85 i 2444 24 ; dl1Inn Rd-RE-91740 &rend Wedlintoy £ 4U4 441 {+26 2,2 }i l S-ri# ar, Inter-gee-For STA 94 l sa5+ir�l4aFSa�lfio aT,A 2;:,• .: 4 25 Ar enro Flaad I4141iFS4 ri Fi:401 l?MAQ _ - 27 c'SG+IRIYari f o c i Mist Er!dg2. BR 0 1 I 28 d}F6• w y-Ayarme F3QPa. _!3491EIF Imp 24 Apple-vay Th.Inman La CMAQ 26 64426 184127 Fitojimi � flOM 4.0 i� 51-oty CIIy-Amoiff4 4al-Aiiii 4 , 1.0304 .;. 6 I - tirrei PrEseFVal i roje . Qty q 4129D 4 !/))lama/9Iv:1. it +Ey 'EvargraCrz 4 R 444 7-424 4-4 Macrcliite.tl exlonaiCn P1se R4(6 -2 r; d,41r,=. .vy ad•OP no 4/444— %6 140m-Rra.64:1 —6,f4-219E': •-kitaialciri LIAR 248 17447 .1Q Pa Road 9a�sky+r�- e Jar-Fe4e-.• 80 -69 lugonno€told Ir4letii44e-laO °sue„ Q #D-1- } 29 App ':,,..:y - W • I • g4.4A,Q 22 34 911i?.;':0-n-.604-4 , - ,t.9,kar l,8-E .S' 444 Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 05-27-2009) Chapter 4- Capital Facilities Page 63 of 72 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan 16 84Itir.fizr Lkiertursan MIra Perrala &TPs>.rr r,:? 8awaie gliy L mita Ne l r i l ! Q.114ai 4 414 34 P4+ Cwt ITS S irota,le F{QraR CMAQ -262 2 224 a6 E�erw.. aci Applaway ° Uroadwray OAP 1-5 f Annual Fo4al 64 668 6 636 2012 i'keln +Jr*rjt FfOin TO Pf rla-yr -AH+14eaII 0 8w re-6 Aerier6 it(S} Rfrieuilil 6 51raet•Pae6ermalian-1,41908. Cty 272g4 2,222 ;46 F1 ri Ra � Sxragir WO 2661 1,237 1 Ptirs! .o;c E+rldr;nU 111°3 Other 2 Lr; 69 44 Val+ey A 27 r. Lari-Pia�,,�tWari Brill4 BR. _r _:4 2,2 iirnadway I=1ara Eiuikr LiGP aQ NI-10012i; P.Gra ga*E- I.JAP 3-0 1'97 as &IOW ROM Anplcvmy -.... :- ;.: .6IAla 2-843 1A15 36 P-• oaa4- #C-14 wily} iikaaJ ay 2?2 2,294 3 32'x-Awanuo av; rjr en ;ot-I 1 3 i 4163 EvagfreEin2" 4e ard STF(UF 406 646 Evert SR 27 361 E4ar ar Raaa 61" Appirvvay 2= Armiia0-ieiar1 1 4,982 4 22.919 r 2013 J4a-iii Prral-at Frri+fl -f Primary ity-Itk i##at €itiil-►'tint Fal 6 .Ire @-FIKt rvaliaa Projr:ni 4;tly 4r 2494 14 a4Gay 1 rlhenri Roan E 1ansiorr — grigatav,LG441 11y FIfr E-6 27 Ili ROVI4P le64-6141,496 1R 3 4,26E 32 1,01isaEa-Ave i s Roo 1 Iarkear LIAR 2-1-13 47664 4 k -,F 4 Aaplawsy 16fermiway Loon #-.8 Park Recta t`2( 44-anly) Sr.e4dway Iliflitrrl+ 6TP(1,f, 214 2,223 2-7 34 °w mr'�.D _YBrgeCr, &OBI 1 TP-N) 44 446 _c+w 22n1 38 CwcF eri2a2ne STP( :.:ice l 644� 27 U} MO i1 I Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 05-27-2009) Chapter 4-Capital Facilities Page 64 of 72 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan tit ikeRa rrtirlr -.-0 i-9-1 if° ikil'Af1.1,9 Hill Z-Cii&-All kmunl ei Soigne 14) 41-a-a40 a9 BigNot ir Aopteway itg.ta 0 L III 40 S u " ' €past l+ el;e5ley ST pew +6-14 SOO 42 P4FIas-16oTidJO I p #€1" CMAQ 160 7-0-2 43 Srd14ivas-lead. b incEona tie F(P) 2 4 4� fly,eirue R Ell ab Rib les SR--2 STP(P). 21;1 OMretlnLTotal 6-44 144 I i I 20 /I t , 1t.e-H1 Paofaalf FifARI -To 144irliari City+lrnnuni Total AF rv,ra.1 Skw.Fr-c-s (St Ai 3rarrt — - : 6 S eal-Pparrawatiar+Prtaj e.1 Q4y 27200 27 3 " E.yeruf.5,1 Pref4 ST!;L': 0 39 BiFkef<PP€f# a` ApRiemiy 1.1.0P 443 2,449 43 S411rtvan-P,oad-T hab led Euspid ST.';., . 126 44 42 t iiur<Rehab f7 4441.4+r°Fe14ta S1 STP(r+ ate{ $9 4G 4Fafaa#0a =ru4 ;Lana .0" (;ity_6Irntla STP(ll rt? 2-24 47 ,#pf4eu4ay-E 4ami+ vt=rgroen TsIi;riay SI7P 442 1-34 40 1.4 ly�ad Inlay--.2 1-56' 4 STP(P) 69 44-4 4t a 614y.er-641Y-Rgail-IB1%I-..1 01,5hintin Mica -07 STP(P1 20 09 6.2 PUP I#RGod tt3 - 1 l3F dlway ST-Pit-4: r 83 @lir ReCaif 17gF-1k2f111414411-F ' Trent fifi #44; Flora Eutlld 14.el id 4! 45+vf .Pcica R43d STa{.U} F# 0 —H Evali4- Para a 54-051# 83? Table 4.38 Six,.Year Tr li$OPriation Capital Facilities and Flnancini Plan 201a ti 11,7- liiiit.lhousanlsj kt:'i prokl IDescrlution Prinfo y City TeLo _ - Source Amount Amount 1 Barker Road Brtdge, BR - 55 4%7 2 Bro..a,, ,F : .:i t +f, awe Io Flora _AP 68 2,465 Ja rk(toad-a 2JEES4910. ¢4!J1 t4 1 lIt 34 _2412' 4 Broadw k ;I,,t; S.- •r -Pin_ SP.-27 + *aL - 167 _ 834 5 lii, nab__ -r !, ,:,10!aroSu!iv ii kt ! waissi.i*T...•f' 2i=. 1874 c r.,.. ne •oad• 194 . -14 *_ 5._ 7 E?roa_d royI utliyan etioirl C _'..2_5Z. 1..23[1 8 Indiana/80J r 1 r . . :+J P 276 tag_ Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 05-27-2009) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities Page 65 of 72 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan 9 Sullivan Read fRE onlya-Cuclldta l t SFPtUI 10 SulilvarJSpradue Irrierse tioet PCC _24 _ .93; 1.6'_6 11 r1ikt rngD1 Ms1WEVOlend proorarn-{U#eriais Odhcr red 2.000 4,000 12 Pauerner61 Menarvernenl Prordarn•Lobel Access City _2,Q9Q 2,0013 13 SThE PIveb (1.1.v 543 3.5443 agi_Q TSrmE I _91_4 . 29,49 Table 4.38 Six-Year Transportation C rt'JTtaI Paci!Itios find FIIIIarlollsi Nan 2011 fdoI1 Ors in tl1ousincs4 Item Pfcs_el DOs�rio=ia9 Primary City TQ ki # _ Source Amount Arnold 6 Argonne Road-190 to Trent _ _ CMAQ 101 713 9 Sullivan Road(F'k onlv)-R=elic do WtiIi sId STl't4J] 40 299 11 Paaemend Martaa mont Proarem-Arlorials Other Fed 2.000 4,000 12 Paanmernl maaawrrigrA.PrvgrogoLe F City _ 200 di 2 000 1 STEP Pa ys r City — 7557 757 14 PJnss Could r ITS Sprague do Trent 259 2,0 Su111yan Road West d ric 147 735 1 ilf9k l {LfS+ -Float dO liar d STPtUY 12a 94D _g011 Totals; Lis3 _man - Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 05-27-2009) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities Page 66 of 72 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan 1-01.49 4,36 Sfx-Year Transiortation CK it€aI Facilities 411d Fil! +IIE=llaci Plan 2012 lcfollars in thousands l!..i. Pra oct Descriniion primary City To/al K Bourne e1r_'ount &mat linr_avemeni Ad_nxtre�hheni Prnaram-Arterials ( kller Fed 000 4,0U0— i �%I'menl Mlanaa®n1enl Prownr�acsh • l! city2...:I.J0 2.000 Su i , �r + 13R _1'47 7 iif ilr. Fibril it go#®i ff'ftls 671 4.i '1 'ark F#a r -#2?C? .1rhl+-E3r�� s o L.. 5 T A�I' 262_ 1 P42 M +i1sx+. 1 'k�:d • °_.'I 5T:21 LLI .. ;r ? - o12 TiraImo_ —5)n§,_. .L4,a 40 _ Tato 4,0 Six-Year Trotiaa+nation Capital Facilities and Financing Flan 2013 do la - i ti orisands. Jim Prr,lm,bescriciiian - ft roc Tylal .0 Amount feu noun - 11 Pavement M:A,:Malt .;,..._n-p l 11-is Other Fed 2 000 _ 4.099 ® ;014. _ = 1- Prr2r -.L1 aa� -s- i 2.O0D 2.[)C: 1„#DD 6.50 17 Pa,k Rood- 2(CiQnlvl-6raadw rrt[a Indiana S - j 509 3.757 1: :.,„_1-:JR.„J..- rh tt) :ill STF'IU7 B4 '45 En P. . `tact-Brit mina heVsi!- if. F Grade epMr i:ii )1?1,rFod 31 750 InSatle-r+S ' •i - '1::f Govelo•ars 62 250 2018)61 a.___43.2.91 17,92? 'Table 4,38 Six-Year Trgalsnortatiort ..vital Facilities and Firlancirac Plan Mil dollars in thousands) I1.„ID f raleciriotion I rf1L1[ rg112 Talal -# _ — i oil ull 111 PavE3merha f arana?nenl PraQrafrl l4rieriraSs OUw Fell 2.009 4,000_ 1 ,” I ss —,' Y — Z,QQQ 15 giiiiiimajDayilito I3rldee Iota _ 1.3 1 3,5[70 =1r (lowish Road•lald_tollih STP(U'L 9.051_ 7,732 10 f'ar6[iogd•B.'id ir1[ rht?Va!l �r I NSA Grade Sc,:ars lion Olrt ECst 4 1t9 21 nr$r leas I l3ari(er Trafic Si No ..talaaers 16 75 2014'14)'615: 5, ''S1D7 Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 05-27-2009) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities Page 67 of 72 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Table 4.36 Six- a aI F cilities and Pi llancln Plan } _ �rto1lars In thqi41_Saiidsl I :tent Phis- at r r:serittti MI PrimarV may. Total 1 Source am= gaunt 1 1 avamaal Manaaemeni r iai Omer Fed _ 2,.W.____..1400 12 Paniva eili Munatierrteilt Nonyarn- Local As C.2,y 2.602 1 !'ar ad-Sri eirFe Vie Valt vl BNS�GrOde 0 eti!1 flier Fed _ 286 6.809 21 Spr&nuv r f3erk9:1- 1,ffig Sla_nsaa - i7cvellspa rs I 74 -M__ 22 i,.!, .. ,- - ;I u -U ivarsi a Ever.reef! ST :d 205 23 - ,.:r .1. d-A..f.,.r •_. €3::.q,r, ;14 U62 ? 84 24 Man-Held _.A;:1; 4.11- 1_- ^ •4 kit- +uhh Hct U.A.P. T3 • ••• 7 25 '.:.Ili,n '.:: :■ 7..11.1 .. ' - -.a a k7i 118- 71, _ STL'I,U. .. c - ? ull s+on f�Dtxt i E�dt gg o falaetaavGurr I QsY 53 _ 55 21 rya . :,e •.i-HO._y ..:r•T = i 0ovelttne: 733 X32 28 -rL r n _ 14 -CC k$TP(E ? — i'"'+''__ 29 St 11 a id .• :roadway to 24A CIN a 11.5D "- OA-_ 30 Citvoide ITS Irrburavera1 nt$ CMAO 95 7.0p_ 31 Eve c r--1 -1' I 32nd.1=Verareen to SR•27 ETr U i 4 1 20 To nls; - '' 1..r.@ Tafa'e 4,3ri-Sits-1f P Trantsirerr et ie 1 + a }t>~30#4 3,G6141 ; 6ew'od-ern] a f TQTALS r YoF rc:ior71 a CIO i; i I.:,iir,ri; •,t..i!3 Q7 4it 11744g al €.14t4 ✓;,t: ,' QV e101 - 1,822 MO 43 a-v-'a: 4643 4 4G -2,277 416. WO 442-6 3-.4-6. X407 .13,434 -_u 4 1,351• 2•044 •:2,3-5 B,Q04 art 1,763 1,617 27465 li,v- 3 7,-1 1;5 3A83 +,490 48, -i 2,112 0 C '2074 wi.66 444 94$e 444 4 1?,'52 1?72-5d 4-1 0 444 4,aia 22,,Q.8 ;ma 0 4 0 2,397 A444 kW 484 24 21,2.21 P844 84-5. 494 ,4 r.1; 33 19 2041 0 4 0 2,3at 1,341 44049 6420 4-44 Zan 2',467 l&O 3 6-14 44 .4 a .24,418 0 P 0 2,76E fps 1;,7 9 440 40-7 4r 1111414 ram 1-429 4•9•7 4,1-P .4M iA1 46`e 11:2.4 'z-9.9] t-.-':; 'h07,1 .3 10 308+1 atioa ` 44r-lt 44$90 4;517 ~75,•3+4 0,033 2;114 i44 Tattle,318 .yc rrrlsa4[18tenn Ir II,irrwi m.nt Iliciriam Suite' 2111rtlttiiunh 2915lin St.00O] I Secured Prolocts Alaiinrsl ern-'cts aI Ye* kill State glIaf Qj r Total fel alati r Ca Total Fite ttai Stala �Olher Ci Toil dg s3,s2s $2.90 $2,161 $t{):951) t �� $4 J i S4_453 $3.826 $2.905 g701 129,493 4511, 52, 71 SI Eiti USN a IS $5,032 I 8 4,41 SO SO U II i1 ` s 1 t.53,^I 7.1:112, IQ El g g gg ft 10 ,a s0 55.196 514-506 59.310 SO 5-5196 ir14,505 2013 g $Q a $1i 3 4 $318 $225 58,991 617.922 $11,388 p 10 1225 5.311 it7.922 2014 do 50 FI uQ ki2 $14976 55l1 8114 56,456 6225.67 $14.976 5911 5164 $6.40 $22,507 20 5 gg _o so w1; 1l $$.417 113 9 5$1 025_. 211 1a 1,71 ,x-077 $3 3.9 iy OZ5 IsM J16,102_ -4,_ 4 724 '.6 tzfGS (2 587 514.012 •. 5110 . ,18 51,414, $35428 031.021 $5&284 59�1i.1 $.1. )4 trjOLI S1E151 3 Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 05-27-2009) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities Page 68 of 72 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan eta :-- - ; -. - p-- - IL a veto Without Loca!Match itlil,i Exlctlritj ricseurccc Pmt-Aierne —meet Doccrifatlo+! Total Cast 81-4-A, ue spFta -1— err3a# to kleyene S276-1-.5 - - - - r-si la pse-. ikela _ - 1A As iii PI &3 2 Ii y {loconetruct 6th Aver,Ue to a three lase caction v5 th cart). S1 - - - g- L or. e,de,t lk ar5r!bi a 9, grue g. - - v-vr4z'T- Ca-Fna ' atruct VII Avenue tc a three land ccctlon wIth curb 63.61t - - - - - X, bid o - Borker Roo ec+ lFwdr;t1oFi—2.2 Stet 1 pekane County Project. rsccnstrust t ricer to 3 land I $40 - - - - - Y t#+ €- 1dq - • Di2yl lit h Road Rahab -32 S4,6P3•rJish Road Rehab Diehmnn Mica to. 427-0 2-4a 9 rood - - SR 27/Pina.;16th Intoccoction 8"!,132 - - - - l rrt t+-an iRp liy!- raci,r lwtere a:k -R oce;cpholt porron7ont wlth Portland comont concrate - - - - payor^vnt I TOT.AM - - - - - - - V-81644 able 4-40 Slx Yraar Trans Eortation Irn roiernent Pro!ram 2010 Throu1.11 2015 In Si 600 'rolecteswithout t11i9 Ex! tars > escauraca Prvta�t f+iame protect Resent tion 32nd Averive- Evelttreen to Reconstruct and widen to three lanes with curbs and sidewalks. 2,237.00 1-carnehar Reconstruct 8th Ave.toe three-lane section o Havana wltl7±curt, r qi.,O DS.U1t4. Ll4 !0 _ 3 n 8nth Avenue Phase 2 - Park to Reconstruct 8th Ave..ter a three-lane Section Dickey with curb, gs,,t.,. idewelks anciljeie lanes. 5,120.00 6th Avenue Phase 3- Dickey to Reccns ruck !ir Ave.to a three lane secfarr Carnaher; wit_lt curb. rrutter.std iks and blke Isms. 3 7,0 Arrpleway Extension - Evergreen Extenjapjam,Exi jaamill210,2 19 TalifIqY Inc!udlnp curbs and alftellan, 13 2 19.00 Reconstruct to 3-fans rOadiNalit wl c enter ! lames sit ewa1ks.curb&gutter and Eaarisar ROO( -€lth to,Aool v suonriwater 5.475.+_ Barks Root_Socotra a River to I.,et Recen tuct o a 2-lane curbed a erial 6 530.00 Broadway .fir► - ullan Intersections PCC Reconstruct i1 reecho in PCC 1 556.00 Broadway Ave-F_lor g Ra Ser I Ic+ Q i4-k t -lunerg_., Flora to 6,824.00 Carnahan Truck Lane-8t11 to City Lir lies; Add SI3 truck Lane to road 5-973.04 Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 05-27-2009) Chapter 4-Capital Facilities Page 69 of 72 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Euclid Arne Flare Rd _I lcrra tudtingssalUadlathr:LIg Reconstructtoorovldea2-tana, sttotl[StaraSi, rr _ arterial 5,408.00 flora Road-Soraoue to ltssicin Re+ nsI uc 3 ane roadway 5.175.00 K.ernan&Sullivsn.P _ co I Ln rsectloru In PCC 1,3514,QQ Park Road- 3-5raua_tn x.amktarkd widen to a standard three. Broadway je arterial street with curbs rind sidewalks 4244:40 Pines Corridor ITS: ;5ttraaue to 18th Traffic SionM control tutem for Corridor 785.00 irriorovemeutsto intersects,~(Duel lane SR27/PPInes/151h 14terrectic a ❑ 111 3,189.40 Univers40 ora .IntRa r a halt pay rrrent =Vow PCC cement concrete pavement 1 g. I TOTAL xs er7.a.o- Potential Annexation Areas/Urban Services The Growth Management Act requires that counties designate urban growth areas (UGAs). The City of Spokane Valley identified lands adjacent to the City within existing UGAs that would likely be developed for urban uses and potentially be annexed to the City. In order to assess the need for capital facilities, the City has identified existing service providers within the Potential Annexation Areas (PAAs). This assessment should help identify the effects a potential annexation area will have on existing levels of service. Table 4.41 Existing Urban Service Providers within Potential Annexation Areas(PAAs) PAAs Northwood Northeast East Southeast South Ponderosa Edgecliff Domestic Water Pasadena Park Consolidated Consolidated Vera Vera S.C.W.D.No.3 East Spokane Hutton Settlement Consolidated S.C.W.D.No.3 Fire&Emergency Services F.D.No.1&9 F.D.No.1 F.D.No.1 F.D.No.1&8 F.D.No.1&8 F.D.No.8 F.D.No.1&8 Law Enforcement Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Libraries S.C.Library Dist S.C.Library Dist S.C.Library Dist S.C.Library Dist S.C.Library Dist S.C.Library Dist S.C.Library Dist Parks&Open Space Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Public Schools W.V.S.D.&S.D.81 E.V.S.D C.V.S.D. C.V.S.D. C.V.S.D. C.V.S.D. W.V.S.D.&S.D.81 Public Transit Not available Not available Not available Not available Not available Not available Not available Sanitary Sewer Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Not Sewered Spokane County Solid WastelRecycle Waste Mgmt Waste Mgmt Waste MgmL Waste MgmL Waste MgmL Waste MgmL Waste Mgmt Storm water Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Street Cleaning Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Transportation Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County The City of Spokane Valley has adopted Levels of Service (LOS) to measure a public facility or service's operational characteristics to gauge its performance. The following analysis will assess current levels of service in the PAAs to provide a context of how annexation could affect the City's LOS and provide guidance for phasing of annexations. Additionally, the analysis will provide City staff and elected officials information to assist in the planning and budgeting of public service delivery as a result of annexation to the City of Spokane Valley. The following study includes LOS analysis for sanitary sewer and parks and open space. Analysis is not provided for services where the City has adopted the minimum regional LOS. Services excluded from this analysis are domestic water, fire protection, law enforcement, libraries, public schools, public transit, sanitary sewer, solid waste/recycle, storm water, street cleaning, and transportation. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 05-27-2009) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities Page 70 of 72 Exhibit 4 Chapter 7 - Economic Development City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Policies EDP-2.1 Develop appropriate urban design and infrastructure standards for the City Center area. EDP-2.2 Develop zoning, permitting, and incentives that encourage prioritized development consistent with the SVCP. EDP-2,3 Focus einnernlc develccmant re ounces ihrau h ca ific r eu9_2. areas Goal EDG-3 Promote the development of a qualified labor force that is globally competitive and responds to the changing needs of the workplace. Policies EDP-3.1 Encourage the region's world-class education consortium. EDP-3.2 Encourage post-secondary education and technical schools to locate and expand offerings within the City of Spokane Valley. EDP-3.3 Encourage community colleges and technical schools in the development of customized training programs for businesses. EDP-3.4 Encourage K-12 education to include skills-based training and creative partnerships with business. EDP-3.5 Encourage public/private partnerships in training and education, through continuing employee education. EDP-3.6 Encourage cooperation among businesses, schools, labor unions and other organizations in developing job training through apprenticeships, mentoring and other programs. EDP-3 7 Promoie Pppa.riunit es that employ Spokane Valley residents in Spokane Valley, Goal EDG-4 Encourage regional tourism as a sustainable provider of jobs and markets. Policies EDP-4.1 Encourage the development of a comprehensive tourism promotion plan that supports the marketing efforts of regional tourism agencies, attractions and events. EDP-4.2 Encourage the development of local attractions, recreational, cultural and sports events which take advantage of the four seasons. EDP-4.3 Encourage and promote the marketing of appropriate facilities that are consistent with Spokane Valley's tourism objectives. EDP-4.4 Expand and develop neighborhood and regional linkages and improvements to the Centennial Trail and Spokane River frontage. Goal EDG-5 Collaborate with other governmental agencies and the business community to promote a sustainable, strong, diverse and healthy regional economy. Policies EDP-5.1 Improve the effectiveness of capital improvement programs by encouraging greater communication and coordination between local governments and the private sector. EDP-5.2 Develop and implement strategies to identify and use appropriate Federal, State and regional economic resources and incentives. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Update 7-31-2008) Chapter 7—Economic Development Page 15 of 16 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan EDP-5.3 Encourage the continued support and funding of active duty, reserves and National Guard components of the United States Armed Forces. EDP-5.4 Collaborate with other local governments and business organizations in promoting legislation in support of economic development when appropriate. EDF-5,5.�Emologg development of and participation In a recognition/certification program for pnsines es aryd ngn-tprofjj,niaetip ,toward Iz a9 sustainable practices in their oneratIons. courage r eveiapment of and r arlicinatlon in a "buoy local' camnaic Goal EDG-6 Establish a balanced approach to environmental sustainability which complements the utilization of area resources and economic growth. Policies EDP-6.1 Encourage the retention, development and recruitment of environmentally friendly businesses. EDP-6.2 Encourage programs that foster and promote sustainable business practices. .EDP-6.3 Rnco- ve the deyelooment of clean technotogies_ Goal E~DG-7 Maintain a regulatory environment that offers flexibility, consistency, predictability and clear direction. Policies EDP-7.1 Evaluate, monitor and improve development standards to promote compatibility between adjacent land uses; and update permitting processes to ensure that they are equitable, cost-effective, and expeditious. EDP-7.2 Review development regulations periodically to ensure clarity, consistency and predictability. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Update 7-31-2008) Chapter 7— Economic Development Page 16 of 16 ri 1 n rs :: • r_ Map 7.1 — 2009 Development Activity 114 irc rp c:;F! �f ! We1xl r,ll_. J g d �t 11,.14 n.rl i, Cl.t f Ube ti 1 c27) • \• ; v ^, 11 41 Legend rrrnait-g :moot reial Rewwunucl Platt Recorded Pleb amlcliminory Approval Plat&❑SPApplioationn 'I!Limn Growth lloundery city of Spokane Valley Cl:Otis.Muniaipolivcx Inn 1-.;,Change', NCT MF-2 MUA GO GCC 0 GCA "°.CMU ▪ CC MUC Ce NC ; R-' C R-2 RC R-3 M I.1 R-4 1.1 1-2 ▪ MF-1 P/O5 Effective Ewe:7.0X0fJXX Ordinance No)C(-5COE Map Location II Os 2 Miles 1 1 I l I t I .K •ur. 00111.1 p . 9 tr!4.4 11A e45,414 m !1 .10,j— .Lx 4 AL* f n. guar ar i. r yr wn r,ON wa eerrra41 rorrlootar h uil v{re 4116111.14 1 r e;ILwwi,. n o1 t.,,-n-.v raw=M.ctn.e,roemsr reriiffv,f,wn. r,n bra,rxrunt T.koar .o.ly.r., J�'+e o, 41'11 Y --111I[r Exhibit 5 Chapter 8 - Natural Environment City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan NEP-8.5 Land use regulations/decisions should consider density transfers, transfer of development rights, bonus density, natural wetland preserves, wetland banking or other mechanisms to retain wetlands whenever possible. NEP-8.6 Encourage public and private groups to consider protection and/or acquisition of wetlands and their buffer areas. NEP-6.7 Encourage the preservation of wetlands associated with wildlife habitat corridors identified by accepted scientific standards. Aquifer/Groundwater Goal NEG-9 Strive to prevent water quality degradation of the Spokane Valley/Rathdrum Prairie Aquifer. development.Qt an inter-it rjsdlctiogal. lorlci raroe plan to manage and protect the Spokane Valley/Ball-drum Prairie Aquifer. Goal NEG-10 Endeavor to protect groundwater quality from adverse development im pacts. Policies NEP-10.1 Participate in cooperative surface and groundwater management efforts with other affected jurisdictions in the region. NEP-10,2 Consider adoolinc1 regulations to reduce or eliminate the impact of land uses that pose a risk tz groundwater. NEP-10 2.3 Strive to retain floodplains and associated wetlands in its natural condition. Fish and Wildlife Goal NEG-11 Strive to preserve, protect, and enhance fish and wildlife habitat. Goal NEG-12 Strive to minimize the impact on priority species from habitat alteration and other human activities. Policies NEP-12.1 Utilize best available science in managing wildlife habitat. NEP-12.2 Strive to preserve and enhance native vegetation in riparian habitats. NEP-12.3 Encourage the use and preservation of native plants in residential and nonresidential landscaping. NEP-12.4 Foster the protection of wildlife corridors in publicly owned open space where appropriate. These areas should use native plants that support native species of birds and animals where appropriate. NEP-12.5 Encourage informational and educational programs and activities dealing with the protection of wildlife. NEP-12.6 Land use regulations and decisions will consider density transfers, bonus density, nature area preservation or other innovative mechanisms to retain fish and wildlife habitat areas. NEP-12.7 Development proposals and their design shall consider the retention and maintenance of critical fish and wildlife habitat areas and will provide buffers to protect corridors and water habitats. NEP-12.8 Coordinate with Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife in planning and management of fish and wildlife habitat resources. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 8--Natural Environment Page 22 of 24 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan 1,.F7' 12.9 Enccuroc}lp the bhic acouisitiori and/or protection of sensitive habitats incluc:iin:, but not limited to.wetlands and shore aes., Flood Areas Goal NEG-13 Work to identify watershed characteristics that affect frequently flooded areas. Goal NEG-14 Assist in the management of frequently flooded areas to enhance environmental quality and to minimize the risks to life and property. Policies NEP-14.1 Frequently flooded areas and marshes should be used as forest, wildlife habitat, open space, recreation and other appropriate uses whenever practical. NEP-14.2 Require the maintenance, protection or restoration of natural drainage systems and use bioengineering techniques rather than structural solutions where possible. NEP-14.3 Development should meet the objectives and requirements of the National Flood Insurance Program for reducing floods hazards and minimizing flood losses within a 100-year floodplain.. Geologically Hazardous Areas Goal NEG-15 Development should be discouraged in geologically hazardous areas unless it can be demonstrated that a hazard area can be developed consistent with public health and safety. Development permits should be conditioned to mitigate certain hazards. Goal NEG-16 Geologically hazardous areas may be used as open space for recreation, forest, wildlife habitat and other uses as appropriate. Policies NEP-16.1 Limit clearing and grading activities in geologically hazardous areas. NEP-16.2 Development proposals within geologically hazardous areas should include an erosion control plan and/or stabilization plan prior to receiving approval. NEP-16.3 Land use regulations and decisions should consider density transfers, bonus density, nature belt preservation or other innovative mechanisms to retain geologically hazardous areas in a natural state whenever appropriate. Surface Water Goal NEG-17 Encourage the continued provision of both adequate quantity and quality of surface water for Spokane Valley. Goal NEG-18 Encourage land uses that are consistent with long-term protection of surface water quality and quantity in Spokane Valley. Goal NEG-19 Collaborate with appropriate public and private entities to help restore the water quality of the Spokane River. Policies NEP-19.1 Impacts of a development proposal upon surface water quality shall be considered before development is approved. Conditioning proposals may be necessary to protect water quality (e.g. biofiltration measures), manage runoff and address erosion control and sedimentation. NEP-19.2 Update the City's interim shoreline management program. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 8—Natural Environment Page 23 of 24 Exhibit 6 SEPA Determination an , COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Spoxarie PLANNING DIVISION Val ley' 11707E Sprague Ave Suite 106 Spokane Valley WA 99206 509.921.1000 Fax: 509.921.1008 cityhall @spokanevalley.org DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (DNS) This DNS is issued using the optional DNS process in WAC 197-11-35S. There is no further comment period on the DNS. File No.: CPA-04-10,CPA-05-10, CPA-06-10,CPA-07-10,and CPA-08-10 Description of proposal: The 2010 Comprehensive Plan amendments include amendments to five Comprehensive Plan Elements: Chapter 2 - Land Use, Chapter 3 -- Transportation, Chapter 4 - Capital Facilities and Public Services, Chapter 7 - Economic Development, and Chapter 8 - Natural Environment. The amendments may also entail minor changes to other elements referencing the proposed amendments. Chapter 2 - Land Use: New policy language will address development agreements in association with site-specific comprehensive plan map amendments. Text edits will also integrate policy language to supplement existing goals to support acquiring open space,publicizing the community's heritage,and connecting neighborhoods. Chapter 3 - Transportation: Map 3,1,Arterial Street Plan, will display the federal reclassification of Conklin Street and Indiana Avenue. Map 3.2, Bike and Pedestrian System, will display newly developed bike and pedestrian infrastructure. Map 3.7, Local Access Street Plan, is new map identifying future access streets within the City of Spokane Valley to improve connectivity and emergency access. Text edits will integrate policy language to supplement existing goals to support linking facilities with non-motorized transportation routes, increasing the percent of total miles of bike lanes in the City, and encouraging fuel-efficient vehicles in the public transportation system. Chapter 4- Capital Facilities and Public Services: Amendments will incorporate changes in the 6-year Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP)into the Capital Facilities Plan to ensure consistency. The Level of Service (LOS)table will be updated to identify a six-year and twenty-year level of service analysis for all arterial intersections in the City of Spokane Valley. Amendments will also update the growth assumptions to reflect population allocation numbers approved by the Spokane County Board of Commissioners, New text will integrate policy language to supplement existing goals to support water conservation, recycling, limiting harmful chemicals, and education programs that result in local employment, Chapter 7 - Economic Development: Amendments will integrate policy language to supplement existing goals to support local businesses,living wages,efficient practices,and clean technologies. Chapter 8 -Natural Environment: New text will integrate policy language to supplement existing goals to protect the aquifer,groundwater,and priority habit species. This proposal is considered a non-project action under RCW 43.21C. Proponent: City of Spokane Valley Location of proposal: N/A Lead Agency: City of Spokane Valley Community Development Department,Planning Division Determination: Pursuant to Title 21 (Environmental Controls) of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code, the lead agency has determined that the proposed text amendments to the comprehensive plan do not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. After a thorough review of the completed environmental Page 1 checklists, the lead agency has determined that an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This information is available to the public on request. DNS issued under WAC 197-11-355 Responsible Official: Staff Contact: Kathy McClung,Community Development Director Mike Basinger,AICP-Senior Planner City of Spokane Valley Community Development City of Spokane Valley Community Development Department Department Valley Redwood Plaza, 11707 E. Sprague Avenue,Suite Valley Redwood Plaza, 11707 E.Sprague Avenue,Suite 106,Spokane Valley,WA 99206 106,Spokane Valley,WA 99206 PH: (509) 688-0030/FX: (509) 921-1008 PH: (509) 688-0045 /FX: (509) 921-1008 km cclung @sp okanevalley.org mbasinger @spokanevalley.org Date issued: February 5. 2010 Signature: APPEAL: An appeal of this determination must be submitted to the Community Development Department within fourteen (14) calendar days after the date issued. The appeal must be written and make specific factual objections to the City's threshold determination. Appeals shall be in conformance with Section 17.90 (Appeals) of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code. At the time of appeal submittal, required fees are due pursuant to the City's adopted Fee Schedule, Pursuant to WAC 197-11-680, appeals shall be limited to a review of a final threshold determination. AGENCY ROUTING: City of Liberty Lake, Community Development City of Spokane,Planning Services Spokane County,Boundary Review Board Spokane County,Building and Planning Spokane County,Division of Utilities - Information Services Spokane County, Clean Air Agency Spokane County,Fire District No. 1 Spokane County,Fire District No. 8 Spokane County,Regional Health District Spokane Transit Authority(STA) Spokane Regional Transportation Council (SRTC) Washington State Department of Ecology (Olympia) Washington State Department of Ecology (Spokane) Page 2 Exhibit 7 Agency and Public Comments ti' '}'r l � \ 1 / STATE OF WASHIIIGTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 128.1011 Avenue SW • PO Box 42525 ■ Olymph?,WAshingtorr 98504-2525 • (360) 7254000 February 1, 2010 Mike Basinger, AICP Senior Planner City of Spokane Valley 11707 East Sprague Avenue Suite 106 Spokane Valley, Washington 99206 Dear Mr. Basinger: Thank you for sending the Washington State Department of Commerce (Commerce)the following materials as required under RCW 36.70A.106. Please keep this letter as documentation that you have met this procedural requirement. City of Spokane Valley- Proposed site specific Comprehensive Plan Amendment for 2010-zoning designation consistent with new land use designation. These materials were received on February 01, 2010 and processed with the Material ID#15398. We have forwarded a copy of this notice to other state agencies. If this submitted material is an adopted amendment, then please keep this letter as documentation that you have met the procedural requirement under RCW 36.70A.106. If you have submitted this material as a draft amendment, then final adoption may occur no earlier than sixtS days following the date of receipt by Commerce. Please remember to submit the final adopted amendment to Commerce within ten days of adoption. If you have any questions, please call me at 509.389.1291. Sincerely, if Dee Caputo Growth Management Planner Growth Management Services CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: March 30, 2010 City Manager Sign-off: Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ® admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE : Interlocal Agreement For Building Plan Review For the City of Airway Heights GOVERNING LEGISLATION: PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: None BACKGROUND: The City of Airway Heights has requested that the City of Spokane Valley consider providing building plan review services to supplement their current services. City staff including Building Official Mary Kate McGee and Acting City Manager Mike Jackson has met with Albert Tripp, City Manager for Airway Heights. An Interlocal Agreement has been drafted and is attached for Council consideration. Because we are expecting a relatively low volume of applications from Airway Heights (approximately 4-5 commercial applications and approximately 40 residential applications compared to about 380 commercial applications and 458 residential applications reviewed in Spokane Valley last year) providing this service is not expected to negatively impact the Building Division's ability to respond to our own citizens in a timely manner. The fee has been set at 40% of the building permit fee as set forth in the City of Airway Heights currently adopted fee resolution. This fee is consistent with charges in Spokane Valley. This interlocal provides an opportunity for Spokane Valley and Airway Heights to work together in a cooperative manner. OPTIONS: Consensus to move this item forward to a future Council meeting for motion consideration; move item forward with recommendations for changes; do not move this item forward for motion consideration. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Consensus to move this item forward to a future Council meeting for motion consideration. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: None. It should be noted that the plan review fees are consistent with Spokane Valley's which may not recover 100% of all direct and indirect costs. STAFF CONTACT: Mike Jackson, Acting City Manager; Mary Kate McGee, Building Official ATTACHMENTS Draft Interlocal Agreement Version Dated: March 2,2010 INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR BUILDING PLAN REVIEW FOR THE CITY OF AIRWAY HEIGHTS (April ,2010) THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into by and between the City of Airway Heights, a municipal corporation of the State of Washington, having offices for the transaction of business at 1208 S Lundstrom Street, Airway Heights, Washington 99001 hereinafter referred to as "CITY OF AIRWAY HEIGHTS" and the City of Spokane Valley, a municipal corporation of the State of Washington, having offices for the transaction of business at the Redwood Plaza, 11707 East Sprague Avenue, Suite 106, Spokane Valley, Washington 99206, hereinafter referred to as "CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,"jointly hereinafter referred to as the "Parties." The CITY OF AIRWAY HEIGHTS and the CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY agree as follows: SECTION NO. 1: RECITALS AND FINDINGS A. Cities may contract with each other to perform certain functions which each may legally perform under chapter 39.34 RCW(Interlocal Cooperation Act)and; B. The CITY OF AIRWAY HEIGHTS has adopted and enforces the Washington State Building Code pursuant to Chapter 19.27 RCW within its jurisdictional boundaries and; C. The CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY has a building division staffed by trained personnel that regularly review permit applications and plans for compliance with the State building code and; D. The CITY OF AIRWAY HEIGHTS has a need for building plan review services to supplement their plan review program and the CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY currently has the ability to provide these services without negative impacts to their program or service and; E. This Agreement is entered into for the benefit of the parties to this Agreement only and shall confer no benefits, direct or implied, on any third persons. F. This Agreement SECTION NO.2: DEFINITIONS A. Agreement: "Agreement" means this Interlocal Agreement between the CITY and the CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY regarding building plan review services. B. Services: "Services"means those services identified in this agreement. C. Compensation: "Compensation"means the amount of money which the City OF AIRWAY HEIGHTS will collect and pay the CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY for providing Services as identified in this agreement. D. Uncontrollable Circumstances: "Uncontrollable Circumstances" means the following events: riots, wars, civil disturbances, insurrections, acts of terrorism, external fires and floods, volcanic Interlocal Agreement for Building Plan Review Services, City of Airway Heights Page 1 of 8 Version Dated: March 2,2010 eruptions, lightning or earthquakes at or near where the Services are performed and/or that directly affect providing of such Services. SECTION NO.3: PURPOSE The purpose of this Agreement is to reduce to writing the PARTIES' understanding as to the terms and conditions under which the CITY OF AIRWAY HEIGHTS and the CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY will enter into this Agreement. It is the intent of the PARTIES that Services to be provided will be consistent with the CITY OF AIRWAY HEIGHTS Council/Manager form of government provided for in chapter 35A.13 RCW. SECTION NO.4: DURATION/WITHDRAWAL This Agreement shall commence on April 1, 2010, and run through December 31, 2010 unless one of the PARTIES provides notice as set forth in Section 7. At the conclusion of the initial term (December 31, 2010), this Agreement shall expire unless the Parties jointly decide to renew. All renewals shall be subject to all terms and conditions set forth herein or as amended pursuant to Section 13 below. Any Party may withdraw at any time from this Agreement for any reason whatsoever upon a minimum of 60 days written notice as provided for in Section 8 to the other Party. SECTION NO.5: PARTIES RESPONSIBILITIES: The CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY will conduct plan reviews of building permit applications for compliance with the State adoption of the International Building Code (IBC)and the International Residential Code (IRC), as currently adopted or subsequently amended, on behalf of the CITY OF AIRWAY HEIGHTS using the CITY OF SPOAKNE VALLEY building division plan review staff. A. The CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY agrees to utilize a certified plans examiner to conduct reviews. B. Plan reviews of building permit applications shall be conducted as follows: 1. A detailed initial review following standard CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY review procedures shall be conducted pursuant to IBC section 106.3 or IRC section 106.3. 2. If building permit application documents are found to be non-compliant,the CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY will provide a written, detailed list of deficient items to the CITY OF AIRWAY HEIGHTS. 3. If building permit application documents are found to be compliant, the CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY will provide a written notice of compliance to the CITY OF AIRWAY HEIGHTS. C. Unless previously agreed to by both Parties, the building permit plan review will be completed and written comments returned to the CITY OF AIRWAY HEIGHTS in five working days or less for applications reviewed subject to the IRC and 15 working days or less for applications reviewed subject to the IBC. Notwithstanding the foregoing, plan review timeframes can be adjusted by written agreement of both Parties. Interlocal Agreement for Building Plan Review Services, City of Airway Heights Page 2 of 8 Version Dated: March 2,2010 D. The CITY OF AIRWAY HEIGHTS shall be responsible for implementing the CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY's plan review determinations through the CITY OF AIRWAY HEIGHTS' permitting process. SECTION NO 6: COST OF SERVICES AND PAYMENTS The CITY OF AIRWAY HEIGHTS shall pay the CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY for Services provided by the CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY under this Agreement in the amount of the 40% of the building permit fee as set forth in the CITY OF AIRWAY HEIGHTS' currently adopted fee resolution. The CITY OF AIRWAY HEIGHTS shall collect such plan review fees at the time of building permit application. The amount of the fee shall be included with application materials forwarded to the CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY. The actual plan review fees collected shall be paid to the CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY at reasonable intervals, although not less frequently than once per quarter. Either party may dispute any claimed moneys owed. In the event the PARTIES cannot mutually resolve any dispute over moneys owed within thirty(30)calendar days from the time a written claim is made,unless otherwise agreed by the PARTIES, the matter shall be resolved pursuant to the Dispute Resolution provisions set forth in Section No. 16. The PARTIES recognize that it is not always possible for either Party to discover errors in payment. The PARTIES further recognize that there must be some finality to addressing such errors. Accordingly, the PARTIES agree that both PARTIES are foreclosed from challenging any errors in payment if the matter is not drawn in writing to the other PARTY'S attention within thirty(30)calendar days of the last invoice of the calendar year. Errors raised within this time frame that are not mutually resolved shall be subject to the Dispute Resolution provisions set forth in Section No. 16. SECTION NO. 7: RELATED RESPONSIBILITIES IN CONJUNCTION WITH PROVIDING SERVICES A CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY representative shall make reasonable efforts to meet upon request by the CITY OF AIRWAY HEIGHTS' City Manager or his/her designee to discuss any Service provided under the terms of this Agreement. SECTION NO.8: NOTICE All notices or other communications given hereunder shall be deemed given on: (1) the day such notices or other communications are received when sent by personal delivery; or(ii)the third day following the day on which the same have been mailed by first class delivery, postage prepaid addressed to the CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY or the CITYOF AIRWAY HEIGHTS at the address set forth below for such Party, or at such other address as either Party shall from time-to-time designate by notice in writing to the other Party: CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY: City of Spokane Valley City Manager or his/her authorized representative 11707 East Sprague Avenue, Suite 106 Spokane Valley,Washington 99206 CITY OF AIRWAY HEIGHTS: City of Airway Heights City Manager or his/her authorized representative 1208 S Lundstrom Street Airway Heights,Washington 99001 Interlocal Agreement for Building Plan Review Services, City of Airway Heights Page 3 of 8 Version Dated: March 2,2010 SECTION NO.9: ASSIGNMENT No Party may assign in whole or part its interest in this Agreement without the written approval of the other PARTY. SECTION NO. 10: CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY EMPLOYEES The CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY shall appoint, hire, assign, retain and discipline all employees performing CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Services under this Agreement according to applicable collective bargaining agreements and applicable state and federal laws. The CITY OF AIRWAY HEIGHTS shall appoint, hire, assign, retain and discipline all employees performing CITY OF AIRWAY HEIGHTS Services under this Agreement according to applicable collective bargaining agreements and applicable state and federal laws. SECTION NO. 11: LIABILITY A. The CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY shall indemnify and hold harmless the CITY OF AIRWAY HEIGHTS and its officers,agents,and employees,from any and all claims,actions, suits,liability, loss, costs, expenses, and damages of any nature whatsoever,by any reason of or arising out of any negligent act or omission of the CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, its officers, agents and employees, relating to or arising out of performing Services pursuant to this Agreement. In the event that any suit based upon such claim, action, loss, or damages is brought against the CITY OF AIRWAY HEIGHTS, the CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY shall defend the same at its sole cost and expense; provided that the CITY OF AIRWAY HEIGHTS reserves the right to participate in said suit if any principle of governmental or public law is involved; and if final judgment in said suit be rendered against the CITY OF AIRWAY HEIGHTS, and its officers, agents, and employees, or jointly against the CITY OF AIRWAY HEIGHTS and the CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY and their respective officers, agents, and employees, the CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY shall satisfy the same. B. The CITY OF AIRWAY HEIGHTS shall indemnify and hold harmless the CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY and its officers, agents, and employees, from any and all claims, actions, suits, liability, loss, costs, expenses, and damages of any nature whatsoever, by any reason of or arising out of any negligent act or omission of the CITY, its officers, agents and employees, relating to or arising out of performing Services pursuant to this Agreement. In the event that any suit based upon such claim, action, loss, or damages is brought against the CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,the CITYOF AIRWAY HEIGHTS shall defend the same at its sole cost and expense;provided that the CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY reserves the right to participate in said suit if any principle of governmental or public law is involved; and if final judgment in said suit be rendered against the CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, and its officers, agents, and employees, or jointly against the CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY and the CITY OF AIRWAY HEIGHTS and their respective officers, agents, and employees, the CITY OF AIRWAY HEIGHTS shall satisfy the same. C. If the comparative negligence of the Parties and their officers and employees is a cause of such damage or injury, the liability, loss, cost, or expense shall be shared between the Parties in proportion to their relative degree of negligence and the right of indemnity shall apply to such proportion. D. Where an officer or employee of a Party is acting under the direction and control of the other Party, the Party directing and controlling the officer or employee in the activity and/or omission giving rise to liability shall accept all liability for the other Party's officer or employee's negligence. Interlocal Agreement for Building Plan Review Services, City of Airway Heights Page 4 of 8 Version Dated: March 2,2010 E. Each Party's duty to indemnify shall survive the termination or expiration of the Agreement. F. The foregoing indemnity is specifically intended to constitute a waiver of each Party's immunity under Washington's Industrial Insurance Act, chapter 51 RCW, respecting the other party only, and only to the extent necessary to provide the indemnified Party with a full and complete indemnity of claims made by the indemnitor's employees. The PARTIES acknowledge that these provisions were specifically negotiated and agreed upon by them. G. The CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY and the CITY OF AIRWAY HEIGHTS agree to either self insure or purchase policies of insurance covering the matters contained in this Agreement with coverage's of not less than $3,000,000 per occurrence with $3,000,000 aggregate limits including professional liability and auto liability coverage's. SECTION NO. 12: RELATIONSHIP OF THE PARTIES The PARTIES intend that an independent contractor relationship will be created by this Agreement. The CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY shall be an independent contractor and not the agent or employee of the CITY OF AIRWAY HEIGHTS, that the CITY OF AIRWAY HEIGHTS is interested only in the results to be achieved and that the right to control the particular manner, method and means in which the services are performed is solely within the discretion of the CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY. Any and all employees who provide Services to the CITY OF AIRWAY HEIGHTS under this Agreement shall be deemed employees solely of the CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY. The CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY shall be solely responsible for the conduct and actions of all employees under this Agreement and any liability that may attach thereto. Likewise, no agent, employee, servant or representative of the CITY shall be deemed to be an employee,agent,servant or representative of the CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY for any purpose. SECTION NO. 13: MODIFICATION This Agreement may be modified in writing by mutual written agreement of the PARTIES. Proposals for modification shall be submitted to the other party at least 60 days before the end of the agreement. SECTION NO. 14: PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT The ownership of all property and equipment utilized in conjunction with providing the Services shall remain with the original owner, unless otherwise specifically and mutually agreed to by the PARTIES to this Agreement. For the purpose of this section,the terminology "owner" means that Party which paid the full purchase price for the property or equipment. SECTION NO. 15: ALL WRITINGS CONTAINED HEREIN/BINDING EFFECT This Agreement contains terms and conditions agreed upon by the PARTIES. The PARTIES agree that there are no other understandings,oral or otherwise,regarding the subject matter of this Agreement. No changes or additions to this Agreement shall be valid or binding upon the PARTIES unless such change or addition is in writing,executed by the PARTIES. This Agreement shall be binding upon the PARTIES hereto,their successors and assigns. Interlocal Agreement for Building Plan Review Services, City of Airway Heights Page 5 of 8 Version Dated: March 2,2010 SECTION NO. 16: DISPUTE RESOLUTION Any dispute between the PARTIES which cannot be resolved between the PARTIES shall be subject to arbitration. Except as provided for to the contrary herein, such dispute shall first be reduced to writing and considered by the CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY and the CITY OF AIRWAY HEIGHTS' City Manager. If the CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY and the CITY OF AIRWAY HEIGHTS City Manager cannot resolve the dispute it will be submitted to arbitration. The provisions of chapter 7.04 RCW shall be applicable to any arbitration proceeding. The CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY and the CITY OF AIRWAY HEIGHTS shall have the right to designate one person each to act as an arbitrator. The two selected arbitrators shall then jointly select a third arbitrator. The selection of arbitrators shall commence within thirty (30) calendar days of the running of the thirty (30) calendar day time frame as described in section 6, paragraph 2. The decision of the arbitration panel shall be binding on the PARTIES and shall be subject to judicial review as provided for in chapter 7.04 RCW. The costs of the arbitration panel shall be equally split between the PARTIES. Each PARTY shall be responsible for its own costs in preparing and presenting its case. SECTION NO. 17: VENUE STIPULATION This Agreement has been and shall be construed as having been made and delivered within the State of Washington and it is mutually understood and agreed by each party that this Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Washington both as to interpretation and performance. Any action at law, suit in equity or judicial proceeding for the enforcement of this Agreement, or any provision hereto, shall be instituted only in courts of competent jurisdiction within Spokane County,Washington. SECTION NO. 18: SEVERABILITY The PARTIES agree that if any parts, terms or provisions of this Agreement are held by the courts to be illegal,the validity of the remaining portions or provisions shall not be affected and the rights and obligations of the PARTIES shall not be affected in regard to the remainder of the Agreement. If it should appear that any part, term or provision of this Agreement is in conflict with any statutory provision of the State of Washington,then the part,term or provision thereof that may be in conflict shall be deemed inoperative and null and void insofar as it may be in conflict therewith and this Agreement shall be deemed to modify to conform to such statutory provision. SECTION NO. 19: RECORDS All public records prepared, owned,used or retained by the CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY in conjunction with providing Services under the terms of this Agreement shall be deemed CITY OF AIRWAY HEIGHTS property and shall be made available to the CITY OF AIRWAY HEIGHTS upon request by the CITY OF AIRWAY HEIGHTS City Manager subject to the attorney client and attorney work product privileges set forth in statute, court rule or case law. The CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY will notify the CITY OF AIRWAY HEIGHTS of any public disclosure request under chapter 42.17 RCW for copies or viewing of such records as well as the CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY's response thereto. SECTION NO.20: HEADINGS The section headings appearing in this Agreement have been inserted solely for the purpose of convenience and ready reference. In no way do they purport to, and shall not be deemed to define, limit or extend the scope or intent of the sections to which they pertain. Interlocal Agreement for Building Plan Review Services, City of Airway Heights Page 6 of 8 Version Dated: March 2,2010 SECTION NO. 21: UNCONTROLLABLE CIRCUMSTANCES/IMPOSSIBILITY A delay or interruption in or failure of performance of all or any part of this Agreement resulting from Uncontrollable Circumstances shall be deemed not a default under this Agreement. A delay or interruption in or failure of performance of all or any part of this Agreement resulting from any change in or new law, order, rule or regulation of any nature which renders providing of Services in accordance with the terms of this Agreement legally impossible, and any other circumstances beyond the control of the CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY which render legally impossible the performance by the CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY of its obligations under this Agreement, shall be deemed not a default under this Agreement. SECTION NO. 22: FILING This Agreement shall be filed by the CITY OF AIRWAY HEIGHTS with such offices or agencies as required by chapter 39.34 RCW. SECTION NO.23: EXECUTION AND APPROVAL The PARTIES warrant that the officers executing below have been duly authorized to act for and on behalf of the Party for purposes of confirming this Agreement. SECTION NO. 24: INITIATIVES The PARTIES recognize that revenue reducing initiative(s) passed by the voters of Washington may substantially reduce local operating revenue for the CITY OF AIRWAY HEIGHTS, CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY or both PARTIES. The PARTIES agree that it is necessary to have flexibility to reduce the contracted amount(s) in this Agreement in response to budget constraints resulting from the passage of revenue reducing initiative(s). If such an event occurs, the PARTIES agree to negotiate in good faith to achieve a mutually agreeable resolution in a timely fashion. SECTION NO.25: COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS The Parties shall observe all federal, state and local laws, ordinances and regulations,to the extent that they may be applicable to the terms of this Agreement. SECTION NO. 26: DISCLAIMER Except as otherwise provided, this Agreement shall not be construed in any manner that would limit either Party's authority or power under law. Interlocal Agreement for Building Plan Review Services, City of Airway Heights Page 7 of 8 Version Dated: March 2,2010 IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the PARTIES have caused this Agreement to be executed on date and year opposite their respective signatures. DATED: CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY ATTEST: Michael Jackson, City Manager Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM ONLY: Office of the City Attorney DATED: CITY OF AIRWAY HEIGHTS ATTEST: Albert Tripp, City Manager Interlocal Agreement for Building Plan Review Services, City of Airway Heights Page 8 of 8 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: March 30, 2010 City Manager Sign-off: Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ® old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ® admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Barker Bridge Project Status Update PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Approval of 2005-2010 Six Year Transportation Improvement Plan, which includes the Barker Road Bridge project, 2) Approval of a Local Agency Agreement and Project Prospectus with WSDOT, 3) Approval of Consultant Services Agreement for Type, Size and Location Study and Final Design Services, 4) Approval of DNR easement agreement at the April 22, 2008 Meeting, 5) Approval of a construction contract with Morgen & Oswood Construction Co. at the June 3, 2008 Council Meeting, 6) Approval of Washington Department of Fish & Wildlife Mitigation Agreement on September 8, 2008 BACKGROUND: The City of Spokane Valley received a Federal Bridge Replacement grant for replacement of the Barker Road Bridge over the Spokane River. The total budget for this project is approximately $11,817,000, which includes City-funded improvements (aesthetic treatments) and reimbursements by affected utility companies Construction started in July 2008, and is expected to be complete this year. OPTIONS: Presentation only. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Presentation only, no action required. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Project is funded by a federal grant up to $9.985 million. Costs in excess of this are being funded by the City. STAFF CONTACT: Steve Worley, Senior Capital Projects Engineer Neil Kersten, Public Works Director ATTACHMENTS Project update slide presentation Barker Bridge Status Update DMfTS OF PIGMENTED SENtR ON SUPER STRUCTURE (TYR) -FACE OF TRAFFIC HARRIER 5.4P 51LEWN-A 94 12-0 DIKE LANE LINE EXISTING CRI<XE (TO 6E REMOVED) OUT-TO-OLIT DECK SLAB 66'-KY FACE-TO-FACE OF TRAFFIC BARPIER rr MEOAAN Vi9T. MIDGE CL LINE (PROFILE G9AU1 ONE) !24 LANE 4'-0" EN DIKE 106E PARKING STRIP 51PDVA16 (TYP) 4-4"WA RWEST COAVUITC +I-4"WA CITY SIGNN- iNTERGOINIECT CONOLV— DiA SEWER FM IN 12" INSULATED CASING-- M 16.3 MADE TESTING PtwPJNG PIERS BEEN PROVIDE PIGMENTED SEPIER F COLUMNS SEAMS TO TOP OF LYY.JJMVS Ir PIA WATER 6(220" INSUOTE0 PIPE CASING ORDINARY WGI1 WATER ELEV.2996.00 March 30, 2010 TYPICAL SECTION SHOWN NEAR PM 249 62642? CR0059684 —MC C+RAI2NG TYPE PP(7TP) —TRAFFIC 566627R(77P) 14,930 2RLSr?ESSeo CONCRETE GIRDER(TIT.) 6•DIA GAS IN 10" INSULATED PIPE CASINO —SEE DWG Mi FOR CROSS BEAM(PIER CAP) ARTWORK DETAILS —7,0"DIAMETER COLUMN(TYP) —?D'DIAMETER SHAFT FOUNDATION(ICr) Exr$TrNG 0602622 ELEV. VARIES Project History • July 1992 — Hinge pin fails on Harvard Road bridge over the Spokane River. Old Barker Road bridge had the same design and was the same age. • January 2000 — Spokane County proposes replacement of Barker Bridge. Estimated project cost is $8.1 million. Project is not funded. • August 2001 — Bridge rated "structurally deficient" on an inspection, scoring 35 out of 100. • October 2003 — Project re-submitted and is 100% Federally funded up to $8.1 million. Barker Bridge Update to Council Broken hinge from Harvard Road bridge Bridge No. Bridge Name Str cture ID BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT SPOK-5503 BARKER RD OVER SPO RIVER 08059800 9nspector's Signature DRH 4 Structural Adgcy (657) 2 Deck Geometry (658) 9 Underclearance (659) 5 Operating Level (660) 8 Alignment Adgcy (661) 8 Waterway Adgcy(662) 3 DeckOverall (663) 6 Drains Condition (664) 1 Drain Status (665) S Deck Scaling (666) 5 'Scaling Percent (667) 3 Deck Rutting (669) 5 Exposed Reber (676) Page 1 or 2 Printed On 0e.4162001 Route 00230 MilePost 3.8 Indent#G9924 _ CoThspectur's Signature Elem Element Description 12 Concrete Deck 110 Concrete Girder 5 7 9 1 6 9 N 5 7 9 9 Superstructure Curbs Sidewalks Paint Number Utilities Substructure Chan/Protection Culvert Pier/Abut/Protect Scour AproachfRdwy Retaining Walls Pier Protection (671) (672) (673) (674) (675) (676) (677) (678) (679) (660) (651) (682) (663) Total 17208 1912 0 N Y Y L Agency Spokane County Intersecting Location SPOKANE RIVER 0.5 S EUCLID ROAD Inspection Frequency 24 Inspection Date 08/02/2001 Inspection Hours 001.5 Bridge Rails (684) Transition (685) Guardrails (686) Terminals (687) Revise Rating (688) Repair Flag (689) Card Check Flag (690) Photos Flag (691) Seasonal Code (692) Soundings Flag (693) Measure Clearance(694) Monitor Structure (695) Units Env SF 3 LF 3 Statel 0 1952 Year Built 0 Year Rebuilt L 36 Operating Rating L 21 Inventory Rating A Open Closed Posted 99'99" Vertical Over Deck 'On Vertical Under N Vertical Under Coda 34.8 SD Sufficiency Rating State2 State3 I State4 O 0 17208 1912 0 0 30 March 2010 Project History • June 2005 — CH2M HILL selected for the "Type, Size and Location" (TS & L) study. • November 2005 — TS & L study complete. Recommendation: 3-span, pre-stressed girder bridge with drilled shaft foundations. • April 2006 — CH2M HILL contract amended to include design services. Barker Bridge Update to Council Type,Size,and Location Report Barker Road Bridge Replacement Project Artist rendering of new bridge 30 March 2010 Project History • July 2006 — Estimate updated; request made and approved for 100% Federal funding up to $9.985 million. • March 2007 — Design revised to preserve access to river from northeast corner of bridge. Barker Bridge Update to Council Recreational access preserved CUI 7,7.,FLY AAP IMOC. rzzgrgr"- rYPCAt5ECTiON 30 March 2010 Project History • April 2008 — Right of way acquired. • May 2008 — CH2M HILL contract amended to include construction management services. Barker Bridge Update to Council gEBNEET V IMAMECOVK,TREE E EER nEMOVEE WING SEC.07,T.25 N.R.45 E.W.M. -TEMPORARY BOUND SEE SHEET RW-1 SEC.08,T.25 N.,R.45 E..W.M. Right of way acquired 30 March 2010 Project History • May 2008 — Project out to bid. Estimated costs: — $7.9 million for bridge — $664,000 in utility work — $66,000 in city traffic conduit & count station — $50,000 in artwork • June 2008 — Project awarded to Morgen & Oswood of Great Falls, MT. Bid prices: — $8.93 million for bridge — $356,000 in utility work — $19,000 in city traffic conduit & count station — $145,000 in artwork • Higher than expected bid exceeds federal grant amount; remainder to be paid by City funds and utilities. Barker Bridge Update to Council CONTRACT DOCUMENTS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF BARKER ROAD BRIDGE REPLACEMENT VOLUME I OF SPECIFICATIGNS Sam .#01W Valley CRY OF SPOKANE VALLEY II oAna.w-=°aeicmu rrvcs�+. CH2MHILL 1......11.1..ru le �P.. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF BARKER ROAD BRIDGE REPLACEMENT VOLUME 2 OF 2 DRAWINGS CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY CH2MHILL s>,arx..r+I v.x.51..10 .wl NOB 30 March 2010 Significant Construction Milestones • July 7, 2008 — Barker Bridge and Centennial Trail closed (detours provided). • August 20, 2008 — Demolition started. Barker Bridge Update to Council 30 March 2010 Significant Construction Milestones • November 13, 2008 — Work bridge started. • February 9, 2009 — First drilled shaft started. Barker Bridge Update to Council 30 March 2010 Significant Construction Milestones • July 11, 2009 — South pier cap (crossbeam) started. • July 24, 2009 — Demolition of old bridge complete. • August 19, 2009 — First girder set. • August 26, 2009 — North pier cap poured . Barker Bridge Update to Council 30 March 2010 Significant Construction Milestones • September 25, 2009 — Last girder set. • December 14, 2009 — Winter shutdown — Deck pour delayed until warmer temperatures — "Non-critical path" work (e.g. utility installation) allowed • March 15, 2010 — Winter shutdown ended . Barker Bridge Update to Council 30 March 2010 Moving Forward • Winter shutdown ended March 15 . • Contractor working on bridge approaches and finishing installation of deck reinforcing steel . • Natural gas, water and sewer work complete . • Deck pour — early April . — Barrier and sidewalks on bridge to follow. • Approximately 10 weeks of work remain after deck is poured . Barker Bridge Update to Council 30 March 2010 Moving Forward • Paving approaches to bridge — early May. • WDFW hydraulic permit restricts in-water work until after June 15 (end of spring spawning) . • Contract does not require work bridge removal prior to opening new bridge . Barker Bridge Update to Council 30 March 2010 Moving Forward • The $ 10 million question : When will the bridge be open? — Current schedule shows late June. — Contract working days currently end May 25. Barker Bridge Update to Council 30 March 2010 Other items • If contract working days are exceeded, Contractor is subject to "liquidated damages" of $3,500 per da Y. • Six Change Orders executed to date, with a total net credit of $ 108,763 . Barker Bridge Update to Council 30 March 2010 Barker Bridge Update to Council Questions ? 30 March 2010 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: March 30, 2010 City Manager Sign-off: Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ® admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE : Interlocal Agreement for Law Enforcement Services GOVERNING LEGISLATION: Chapter 39.34 RCW Interlocal Cooperation Act PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: March 6, 2003 City Council authorized the City Manager to execute the original Interlocal for Law Enforcement Services with Spokane County. BACKGROUND: The City of Spokane Valley entered into an Interlocal Agreement for Law Enforcement Services with Spokane County effective June 1, 2003. City staff and Spokane County are currently negotiating a new contract. At a future date, staff will present the Draft Interlocal to City Council requesting authorization for the City Manager to execute the contract. Pursuant to negotiations, staff would like to discuss key elements of the contract with Council. The key elements staff has identified for discussion are: • Performance measures • Length of contract • Cost control and service level • Community Identity OPTIONS: RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Discussion only BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: The Law Enforcement Contract represents 45% of anticipated General Fund expenditures in 2010. The contract has significant budget/financial implications to the City. STAFF CONTACT: Mike Jackson, Acting City Manager ATTACHMENTS DRAFT ADVANCE AGENDA For Planning Discussion Purposes Only as of March 24, 2010; 2:00 p.m. Please note this is a work in progress; items are tentative To: Council & Staff From: City Clerk, by direction of Acting City Manager Re: Draft Schedule for Upcoming Council Meetings April 6,2010, Study Session Format,6:00 p.m. [due date Mon,March 29] 1. Spokane Valley Arts Council Update-Dr. Harkin (10 minutes) 2. Collaborative Planning, Boundary Review Board- Susan Winchell; Brett Sheckler (30 minutes) 3. Commute Trip Reduction (CTR)Plan-Morgan Koudelka (15 minutes) 4. Snow Operations-Neil Kersten (20 minutes) 5. Transportation Benefit District-Cary Driskell (30 minutes) 6. Comp Plan Update-Greg McCormick (15 minutes) 7. Advance Agenda (5 minutes) 8. Executive Session: [*estimated meeting: 125 minutes] April 13,2010 Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. Idue date Mon,April 5] Proclamation: Take Kids to Work Day 1. Consent Agenda: Claims,Payroll,Minutes (5 minutes) 2. Second Reading Proposed Ordinance Adult Entertainment - Cary Driskell (10 minutes) 3. First Reading Proposed Ordinance Amending Comp Plan- Christina Janssen/Mike Basinger(20 minutes) 4. First Reading Proposed Ordinance Amending Zoning Map-Christina Janssen/Mike Basinger(10 minutes) 5. Proposed Amended Fee Resolution,Adult entertainment Appeal Process- Cary Driskell (10 minutes) 6. Proposed Resolution Adopting Amended 2010 TIP- Steve Worley (10 minutes) 7. Proposed Resolution Setting Street Vacation Public Hearing (STV 01-10)-Karen Kendall (10 minutes) 8. Motion Consideration: Lawsuit Release and Settlement-Mike Connelly (10 minutes) 8. Admin Report: Advance Agenda (5 minutes) 9. Executive Session: [*estimated meeting: 90 minutes] April 20, 2010, Study Session Format,6:00 p.m. [due date Mon,April 19] 1. Advance Agenda 2. Code Enforcement Update-Kathy McClung (20 minutes) 3. Executive Session [*estimated meeting: minutes] April 27,2010,Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due date Mon,April 19] 1. Consent Agenda: Claims,Payroll, Minutes (5 minutes) 2. Second Reading Proposed Ordinance Amending Comp Plan- Christina Janssen/Mike Basinger(10 minutes) 3. Second Reading Proposed Ordinance Amending Zoning Map-Christina Janssen/Mike Basinger(10 minutes) 4. First Reading Proposed Ordinance Amending CTR Plan-Morgan Koudelka (10 minutes) 5. Admin Report: Advance Agenda (5 minutes) 6. Admin Report: Council Broadcasting-Greg Bingaman/Morgan Koudelka (70 minutes) 7. Info Only: Department Reports 8. Executive Session [*estimated meeting: 110 minutes] May 4,2010, Study Session Format,6:00 p.m. [due date Mon,April 26] 1. Six-Year 2011-2016 Transp. Improvement Plan- Steve Worley (20 minutes) 2. Advance Agenda (5 minutes) 3. Executive Session [*estimated meeting: minutes] Draft Advance Agenda 3/25/2010 3:30:11 PM Page 1 of 3 May 11,2010 Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. Idue date Mon,May 3] 1. Consent Agenda: Claims,Payroll, Minutes (5 minutes) 2. First Reading Proposed Ordinance Amending CTR Plan—Morgan Koudelka (10 minutes) 3. Admin Report: Advance Agenda (5 minutes) 4. Executive Session: [*estimated meeting: minutes] May 18, 2010, Study Session Format,6:00 p.m. [due date Mon,May 101 1. Advance Agenda 2. Executive Session [*estimated meeting: minutes] May 25,2010,Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due date Mon,May 171 1. PUBLIC HEARING: Six-Year 2011-2016 Transp. Improvement Plan (10 minutes) 2. Consent Agenda: Claims,Payroll, Minutes (5 minutes) 3. Admin Report: Street Vacation STV 01-10—Karen Kendall (15 minutes) 4. Admin Report: Advance Agenda (5 minutes) 5. Info Only: Department Reports 6. Executive Session [*estimated meeting: minutes] June 1,2010, Study Session Format,6:00 p.m. [due date Mon,May 24] 1. Advance Agenda (5 minutes) 2. Executive Session [*estimated meeting: minutes] June 8,2010 Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due date Mon,May 311 1. Consent Agenda: Claims,Payroll, Minutes (5 minutes) 2.First Reading Proposed Ordinance Vacating Street(STV 01-10)-Karen Kendall (15 minutes) 3. Proposed Resolution Adopting Six-Year 2011-2016 TIP— Steve Worley (10 minutes) 4. Admin Report: Advance Agenda 5. Executive Session [*estimated meeting: minutes] June 15,2010, Study Session Format,6:00 p.m. [due date Mon, June 7] 1. Advance Agenda (5 minutes) 2. Executive Session [*estimated meeting: minutes] June 22,2010: No Meeting: Council Attends AWC Conference in Vancouver(June 22-25) June 29,2010, Special Regular meeting format 6:00 p.m. [due date Mon,June 21] 1. Consent Agenda: Claims,Payroll, Minutes (5 minutes) 2. Second Reading Proposed Ordinance Vacating Street(STV 01-10)-Karen Kendall (10 minutes) 3. Advance Agenda (5 minutes) 4. Executive Session [*estimated meeting: minutes] July 6,2010, Study Session Format,6:00 p.m. [due date Mon,June 28] 1. Advance Agenda (5 minutes) 2. Executive Session [`estimated meeting: minutes] Draft Advance Agenda 3/25/2010 3:30:11 PM Page 2 of 3 OTHER PENDING AND/OR UPCOMING ISSUES/MEETINGS: ADA Plan Affordable Housing Participation Alternative Analysis (contracts) Area Agency on Aging Bidding Contracts (SVMC 3. —bidding exceptions) Budget(2010 Amendment) Budget 2011 (fall 2010) Clean Air Agency Code Amendments (Kathy McClung) Community Development Block Grant(Fall 2010) Concurrency East Gateway Monument Structure # Hotel/Motel Grant Proposals for 2011 (Nov 2010) Law Enforcement Contract a Lobbyist Presentation(Gordon, Thomas,Honeywell) Milwaukee Right-of-way Outside Agencies Presentation (August) Overweight/over size vehicle ordinance Planned Action Ordinance Retreat, summer(late July?) Sheriff Office Request, Emergency Mgmt Update• Solid Waste Board Spokane Regional Transportation Council (SRTC) Interlocal Sprague Appleway Corridor Environ. Assessment Transportation Benefit District: (a). Establish ord.; (b)set public hearing; (c) draft resolution; (d) ballot language Transportation Impacts Waste Management Leased Site WIRA,Water Protection Commitment,public education =request for Council's early consideration # =Awaiting action by others * =doesn't include time for public or council comments Draft Advance Agenda 3/25/2010 3:30:11 PM Page 3 of 3 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: March 30, 2010 City Manager Sign-off: Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ® information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: 2010 Corbin Sanitary Sewer Project (Proposed Pump Station Location) GOVERNING LEGISLATION: PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Adopted 2010-2015 Six Year TIP which includes the 2010 STEP paveback program; Informational RCA in Council's Winter Retreat Packet; Admin Report to Council February 16, 2010. Approval of the MOU with Spokane County for the 2010 STEP projects. BACKGROUND: The Corbin Sanitary Sewer Basin includes the area north of Sprague Avenue and south of the Appleway Ave. between Greenacres Road to the west and Hodges Road to the east. Spokane County is asking for permission to construct a pump station in the city right-of-way on McMillan Court north of Valleyway Avenue. This pump station would serve approximately 140 homes. Staff asked the county to meet with homeowners in the proposed pump station location to see if there would be any concerns. The county did this and there doesn't appear to be any concerns from the neighbors. Attached is information from Spokane County regarding their proposal and a summary of their contact with nearby neighbors. Public Works staff has reviewed this information and proposes to grant permission to the county to locate the pump station in the right-of-way as proposed. If council has any questions or concerns regarding this proposal, please contact Neil or Steve by close of business on Wednesday, March 31. OPTIONS: Information only. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Information only. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: None STAFF CONTACT: Neil Kersten, Public Works Director Steve M. Worley, Senior Capital Projects Engineer ATTACHMENTS Spokane County Letter dated March 19, 2010 with attachments. � 9}A � t' ¢ S po A 1 a �� i WY DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT March 19, 2010 Neil Kersten Public Works Director City of Spokane Valley 11707 E. Sprague Ave., Suite 106 Spokane Valley, WA 99206 Re: Corbin Sanitary Sewer Project No.104 Pump Station Location Dear Neil: Spokane County is in the process of providing sanitary sewer service for an area east of Barker Road and south of Appleway, a project called Corbin Sanitary Sewer Project. Within this project, there is an area serving approximately 140 homes which will require a pump station. The footprint of the proposed pump station will be about 8' by 10' to house electrical control equipment. Pumps will be located within a wet well outside the building. The proposed location for this pump station is within existing right-of-way on McMillan Ct. This cul-de-sac has a roadway width of about 60 feet. We propose to narrow this roadway to 40 feet and construct the needed pump station within the 20 feet of existing road area. No existing surrounding yard area would be used. See attachments for proposed location in the cul-de-sac. As requested, we have contacted the property owners in the neighborhood. In the attachments, there is a document that provides details of our interaction with them. We met individually with three of the property owners and sent letters to four other property owners to get their input. There has been no opposition to the proposed pump station. We did receive valuable input on colors for the pump station and specifics for their own connections to the sewer main. Please review the attachments. They show what has been presented to the property owners and summarize our interaction with the neighborhood. We are requesting the City's concurrence on the location of the proposed pump station so we may proceed with design of both the sewer main system and the pump station building and related facilities. If you have any questions, please give either Kevin Cooke or myself a call. Sincere y, - „ `Y" Tim Schwab Design Engineer Attachments Cc: Steve Worley, City of Spokane Valley Kevin Cooke, Sewer Planning and Design Manager Stela Matei, Project Manager • 1026 WEST BROADWAY AVENUE ® SPOKANE, WA 99260-0170 PHONE: (509) 477-3600 • FAX: (509) 477-7655 6 TDD: 509-477-7133 Corbin Pump Station at McMillan Ct. Summary of Neighborhood Interaction The Corbin Sanitary Sewer project serves as part of the project an area bounded on the south by Sprague Ave., on the north by Valleyway, on the west by Harmony and on the east by Hodges and Holiday. This area drains naturally to a low point near McMillan Ct., a cul-de-sac street with a roadway width of about 60 feet. Spokane County Utilities has obtained easements for the purpose of constructing sewer main from McMillan Ct. to Cane Circle to LaBeny and the sewer interceptor that runs parallel to Appleway. Early design efforts included attempting to design a system that did not require a pump station. However, this concept was considered not desirable due to: 1)Pipe grades not steep enough to meet design standards; 2) The invert that the sewer main would empty into the sewer interceptor pipe would be lower than design standards resulting in possible backups and additional maintenance; 3) The pipe would have to be placed fairly shallow in the street which would result in a significant number of houses being required to have grinder pumps to pump to the sewer main. Due to these factors, a small pump station is being proposed in existing right-of-way at McMillan Ct. The City of Spokane Valley requested that Spokane County Utilities contact adjacent property owners for their input on the proposed pump station. A concept plan showing the location of the pump station in relation to the existing street and adjacent properties was prepared along with a rendering of what the pump station and surrounding area will look like when constructed. Some photos were taken of a similar size pump station and printed out for review. Meetings were set up with three property owners who were most affected. A copy of the notes regarding these meetings is included. At these meetings,using the prepared plans and exhibits some background on the project was presented, along with the need for the pump station, and what the pump station could look like. The people gave their input on possible color types for the proposed building and mentioned any concerns they have. As seen in the meeting notes, the neighbors were not opposed to the pump station. There are four other property owners who have property relatively near to the pump station. These four were sent letters asking for their input on the proposed pump station. These letters were sent on March 8, 2010 and to date none of these property owners have contacted us. Hat some time in the future they do contact us, we will get their input on the proposed pump station. -G—I fI ____ • :;�I__ _ _=__ Y__ _ _ A� � `= = __ EtIII ' '- '`-_ TZG ;.. : .:_ : WAR ,. ' s:_ SiIi �_ _ . . = .;Q .::. •.,.__ -. _._ EII; ERSE- _ c_ •. _,_..•.LL . , 3 J v� ..:.......... ... .. .. :....... :.... . ..:. ..:.... ....:.:.:. =':` CALAHAtI,JOHII M rAiIPrl — .. .. . . :.... .. HELL III. .. ..... -- ... _.. . .. .... .:. .. . .. ......... . ..... ....:.. ST:•L> AR FOSTE 3 Tuesday,Mar 16,2010 0 :50 PM • Corbin Sanitary Sewer Pump Station Site Neighborhood Meeting Notes Mike and Charlene Calahan, 19105 E. Valleyway Ave. March 2, 2010 Kevin Cooke, Stela Matei and Tim Schwab met with Mike and Charlene Calahan at their home 6:30 PM. Kevin presented the information on the need for the pump station and the proposed location of the pump station adjacent to their property in existing public right-of-way. During the course of discussion, the Calahan's had the following comments regarding the proposed pump station: - Mike said several times "I basically don't have any problem with the pump station at this site." - Charlene like the color of light brown for outside of the pump station. - The Calahans wanted to save the clump of birch trees at the northeast corner of their property. - Mike mentioned several times his concern that the pump station building could be vandalized. - They would like the existing chain link fence to go back in about the same place as existing if possible. They do not want slats put in the fence. Paul and Jan Worley, 19109 E.McMillan Ct. March 4, 2010 Stela Matei and Tim Schwab met with Paul and Jan Worley at Spokane County Public Works building at 10:30 AM. The information on the proposed pump station was presented to them. They didn't have a problem with the proposed pump station structure. Paul said that he will have to park his RV when unloading a little differently, but could work around it. He said he will have to back into his driveway with the 30' motor home a different way, but should be ok. The colors they really didn't care. Jan said that whatever Char(Charlene Calahan, their neighbors) wanted, it would be ok with her. Jan liked the light tan shown in the rendering. They brought up an issue about the Calahan's tree located near the property corner and wanted to make sure that their neighbor's sewer stub doesn't go on their property. Stela will contact the survey department and locate the property corner. If needed, the Calahan's sewer stub can be installed on the south side of the tree. They want us to contact them regarding this issue once we determine more accurately the location of the property corner. Paul and Jan warned us about the neighbor's pit bull dogs. Shaun and Deborah Pedersen, 19121 E. Valleyway March 15, 2010 Fred Foss (RW) and Tim Schwab met with Shaun and Deborah at their home address at 11:00 AM. Deborah showed up about 20 minutes after we started talking to Shaun and had some brief question before going inside. The information on why the proposed pump station was needed and what was proposed was presented to Shaun. He (and later his wife) didn't have a problem with the proposed pump station structure. We showed him on the plan how we would hook up the service connection to his house and how we would have to avoid a stairway on the east side of the house. They would like the pump station to use natural colors as much as possible. The light brown color for the split faced block is ok, would rather not have a red color. A green color was ok for the roof, but ended with a statement to the effect that they don't care that much about the colors. He thanked us for coming out and showing him what was being planned for the pump station. Much of these interest was schedule related, when it was anticipated that the construction would take place around their house. It was conveyed to them that much of the schedule is up to the Contractor, with the pipe contractor possibly doing the work around their house in June/July and the pump station contractor doing that work August or later. They were interested in whether a couple of small trees located within the front yard would be taken out by the construction. We couldn't give them a definite answer, they may be able to be saved. [ 4[ �� fr i Iic--74Icr!r {. Goii\Ury i-,:4 i4 ll 711is ii-.1,.. D I V I S I O N O F ENGINEERING AND ROADS A C)rvrsroN Or; THE PU[tiLJC WORK'S DEI'AtITnrr;NT March 8, 2010 Re: Corbin Sanitary Sewer Project No.104 Pump Station information Dear Jeffrey and Amanda Lashaw: Spokane County is currently in the process of designing a sanitary sewer system to service the properties in your area. A notice was sent last fall concerning this upcoming project. At the start of the design process, it was our goal to avoid having to install a pump station near McMillan Ct. (the tow area in the neighborhood). However, due to design constraints, a pump station is needed to provide both adequate slope on the sewer pipe (avoid clogging in the pipe) and to avoid requiring a significant number of homes in the area to install individual grinder pumps to discharge into the sewer main in the street. There is currently planned a small structure (8' x 10') to house electrical controls. The pumps will be submersible pumps located in an oversized manhole in McMillan Ct. We are interested in meeting with you at your earliest convenience to discuss this situation and get your input on color ideas for the exterior and roof of the building. Attached is a plan sheet showing the proposed location of the structure and street revisions and a concept of what the structure could look like placed digitally on a photo. Please call us to set up a time we could meet. We are willing to meet either on-site or at our Spokane County office. The number you may reach me is 477-7658. Sincerely�,p '- iivi Tim Schwab Design Engineer Attachments Cc: Kevin Cooke, Sewer Planning and Design Manager Stela Matei, Project Manager I ij'�, �f POKAWNIKkirSti:1M',. i, ', 1 S DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS A DivisioN op THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT March 8, 2010 Re: Corbin Sanitary Sewer Project No.104 Pump Station Information Dear Jeremiah Green: Spokane County is currently in the process of designing a sanitary sewer system to service the properties in your area, A notice was sent last fall concerning this upcoming project and right-of-way agents have contacted you for the purpose of obtaining easements to construct a sewer mainline. At the start of the design process, it was our goal to avoid having to install a pump station near McMillan Ct. (the low area in the neighborhood). However, due to design constraints, a pump station is needed to provide both adequate slope on the sewer pipe (avoid clogging in the pipe) and to avoid requiring a significant number of homes in the area to install individual grinder pumps to discharge into the sewer main in the street. There is currently planned a small structure (8' x 10`) to house electrical controls. The pumps will be submersible pumps located in an oversized manhole in McMillan Ct. We are interested in meeting with you at your earliest convenience to discuss this situation and get your input on color ideas for the exterior and roof of the building. Attached is a plan sheet showing the proposed location of the structure and street revisions and a concept of what the structure could look like placed digitally on a photo. Please call us to set up a time we could meet. We are willing to meet either on-site or at our Spokane County office. The number you may reach me is 477-7658. Sincerely, 4484 i„La Tim Schwab Design Engineer Attachments Cc: Kevin Cooke, Sewer Planning and Design Manager 1 ir't'ti{! �r; 'I�qO'}/y,So}[nI�_ i:' ' Co;i.j,ii.ri_2:It'li r . 1 DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS A i_)IvISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT March 8, 2010 Re: Corbin Sanitary Sewer Project No.104 Pump Station Information Dear James and Monica Davis: Spokane County is currently in the process of designing a sanitary sewer system to service the properties in your area. A notice was sent last fall concerning this upcoming project. At the start of the design process, it was our goal to avoid having to install a pump station near McMillan Ct. (the low area in the neighborhood). However, due to design constraints, a pump station is needed to provide both adequate slope on the sewer pipe (avoid clogging in the pipe) and to avoid requiring a significant number of homes in the area to install individual grinder pumps to discharge into the sewer main in the street. There is currently planned a small structure (8' x 10') to house electrical controls. The pumps will be submersible pumps located in an oversized manhole in McMillan Ct. We are interested in meeting with you at your earliest convenience to discuss this situation and get your input on color ideas for the exterior and roof of the building. Attached is a plan sheet showing the proposed location of the structure and street revisions and a concept of what the structure could look like placed digitally on a photo. • Please call us to set up a time we could meet. We are willing to meet either on-site or at our Spokane County office. The number you may reach me is 477-7658. Sincerely, ! Tim Schwab Design Engineer Attachments Cc: Kevin Cooke, Sewer Planning and Design Manager Stela Matei, Project Manager y 7 i fS�l(]/�¶yy PI��1iS ['�Spoic� I& UiI tll4•.. tJ u i.Yip DIVISION OF ENGINEERING A ND ROADS A DIVISION OF 'CUE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT March 8, 2010 Re: Corbin Sanitary Sewer Project No.104 Pump Station Information Dear James Peters: Spokane County is currently in the process of designing a sanitary sewer system to service the properties in your area. A notice was sent last fall concerning this upcoming project. At the start of the design process, it was our goal to avoid having to install a pump station near McMillan Ct. (the low area in the neighborhood). However, due to design constraints, a pump station is needed to provide both adequate slope on the sewer pipe (avoid clogging in the pipe) and to avoid requiring a significant number of homes in the area to install individual grinder pumps to discharge into the sewer main in the street. There is currently planned a small structure (8' x 10') to house electrical controls. The pumps will be submersible pumps located in an oversized manhole in McMillan Ct. We are interested in meeting with you at your earliest convenience to discuss this situation and get your input on color ideas for the exterior and roof of the building. Attached is a plan sheet showing the proposed location of the structure and street revisions and a concept of what the structure could look like placed digitally on a photo. Please call us to set up a time we could meet. We are willing to meet either on-site or at our Spokane County office. The number you may reach me is 477-7658. Sincerely, u,, , L c Tim Schwab Design Engineer Attachments Cc: Kevin Cooke, Sewer Planning and Design Manager Stela Matei, Project Manager ''".. .....1.... 14 . 1 =. ___ 717.,..=•-........:1 T _.444-'171.144- ' .,,.1.`, `,- ,...47.. , .._. X, ,- •1- ■ I . t i .. .. • - 1 „ . ,.._. . : ..,. , ,,_ _ _• .. il I . . _. ,- S't _ j t 0...„ ' . _ - --"/"''' - - - --•-, f -,-.1 ...,,,........../. . ism, .._- .. • 1,. -----,, .-8 N.71711.' ). _ . t„--1_,,, ,--, - ..,_ , .-.-..z i, , ..., ,... \ '. : , ----.),(-) , , i- ! nn ik.:- - 1 - ..... , t_.„ . . - i 1 ., ...*-, . ,,.. '.c..}tt.: ,..• 1 " = 5 ' -- 5 2 - -- • i PL./ VP pEs __ \ TAT oN -.1 4 r I '46 ir, i ,.• Pi i e ,,,.. .-7*-7-..:4;, - ,c._._ ., . - . , . .. ... , _ • 5 . - -- —.91.,-- ,I 1 . _ '‘.4''''VO ■ mI / • , - . /I ,.... t....p -4 • 11 / 11 I 1, .... , r L. .. . . - [,..i LC),..., r ' ' ' 14■%.\'-' ._ -,: ,. 7 i 1 . -P. -''' ' VA \ - : ..'. \ 4 ■?-' , t ki . . . - .1. . _ I . t. _r,••.,,/ i C.))3 7 . _. ' ,-/,'''''' ' d 73 I, -if :.,,.. ' .''• ' - . . , ' 411111k 1 1 d -,...„ . '.... •,__.._, ,...., 4'- . . . ,.. .. ... .•VI. t .N. I 441 1 ' . d 1 _ . • . _., .,.. L.. '. ..- ., .--. . — r•I ' • ,, ■ . , 1 li ■'■- - / _ .../ ,. . _ • MO. I. , , 1 , . -' ' 4' . 4.-i''' , '' ''L., '1.■ \''I'...,' ' . $'• r.. 4.-- • - • $A _ I . -... , ... .. • 1...••• '-:...•••...-- ----, ,.• le A -•,r ', 11 ) --• - ' ; ' ......4.4‘ , --' .. ‘ ',...- ii '41 .. ".....-^. .,,. _...-4.-i- -. ',..; -,..--- :-- ==----------- -' - v 2041.22 IN # . 12 k. 7. ,,....., •, "7 A 1 I I I I I I I. • : _ _3 I_3. __ . _ , ■ di 1-rpCji 1 0 lialiPar :r. ,4. rn I d 1. 1 , eit . 1 .. p ,_.. ,,.,.,,„. ..,. 4 I....,. '''''. - '-. . V:•_ 4116 . . .. _..........___, ....__,. . , , _ . .._.... _ . _ , _. 1 " — 2 0 , ii rill -i".1 , .1,...,0',..+' . - 1 04 CORBIN spo.,,,,,,,:„2„ P.'s.' S r ' i61f - ' I" .. 1 # - • _ a] v ME - - -� )14111, 41111111010. - > .} °,..`yam, +r y 7 c ' '- _ v j 4,5+ 1 y atY 'f F ' f *y 4� :�r c l + }] - •. _4_j"_ciz i C ' 1 irk i . r"e4u.,� , 4.." g '^^R� rwa S - iit i f,:. 'fie 1- - _ v— - - �-f '1-°Y�I'��il�Rr a ' '1`1Rt .{yam ,'.,-"4 r R� r sJrll.-.. 7 4 -0 1 T ' ;' '''t FJ,. _ 4.''"Liti' 11,'. ,:,*,Nc t tsf'+ s�yi. Fri a „.,4.1 rt .,4,,,..E- F±,-: �t i," r yr.. i 1 ,1:I.,r a•. yrn.y,a. .r