The URL can be used to link to this page

2010, 06-29 Regular MeetingAGENDA SPOKANE VALLEY CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL/REGULAR MEETING FORMAL MEETING FORMAT Tuesday, June 29, 2010 6:00 p.m. Spokane Valley City Hall Council Chambers 11707 E Sprague Avenue Council Requests Please Silence Your Cell Phones During Council Meeting CALL TO ORDER: INVOCATION: Pastor Craig Goodwin, Millwood Community Presbyterian Church PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: ROLL CALL: APPROVAL OF AGENDA: INTRODUCTION OF SPECIAL GUESTS AND PRESENTATIONS: COMMITTEE, BOARD, LIAISON SUMMARY REPORTS: MAYOR'S REPORT: PUBLIC COMMENTS: This is an opportunity for the public to speak on any subject not on the agenda for action. When you come to the podium, please state your name and address for the record and limit remarks to three minutes. 1. CONSENT AGENDA Consists of items considered routine which are approved as a group. Any member of Council may ask that an item be removed from the Consent Agenda to be considered separately. a. Approval of the following claim vouchers: VOUCHER LIST DATE W/VOUCHER NUMBERS: TOTAL AMOUNT 05/27/2010 20278 -20306 $87,432.76 06/04/2010 3162 -3164 $54 06/08/2010 3172 -3185; 20314 -20319 $204,648.83 06/11/2010 20320 - 20375; 527100023, 528100037 604100027 $1,842,674.78 06/11/2010 20376 -20416 $87,420.86 06/17/2010 20417 - 20446; 611100026; 617100023 $494,540.56 06/17/2010 3187 -3189 $59,242.14 GRAND TOTAL $2,830,367.30 b. Approval of Payroll for Period Ending June 15, 2010: $260,133.98 c. Approval of Forinal Council Meeting Minutes of June 8, 2010 d. Approval of Study Session Meeting Minutes of June 15, 2010 NEW BUSINESS 2. Second Reading Proposed Ordinance Vacating Street (W of 16 & Kahuna) (STV 01 -10) - Karen Kendall [public comment] Council Agenda 06 -29 -10 Regular Meeting Pagel of 2 3. Proposed Resolution Adopting 2011 -2016 Six Year Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) — Steve Worley [public comment] 4. Motion Consideration: Bid Award, Sprague /Sullivan Concrete Intersect Project — Steve Worley [public comment] 5. Motion Consideration: Bid Ward, Broadway Avenue Reconstruct Project, Moor to Flora - Steve Worley [public comment] 6. Motion Consideration: Suspend Broadway Safety Project — Neil Kersten [public comment] 7. Motion Consideration: Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) — Morgan Koudelka [public comment] PUBLIC COMMENTS: This is an opportunity for the public to speak on any subject not on the agenda for action. When you come to the podium, please state your name and address for the record and limit remarks to three minutes. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS 8. Cattlemen of Spokane County — Cindy Marshall 9. Pavement Requirements — Kathy McClung 10. Ballot Measure — Mike Jackson 11. Advance Agenda - Mayor Towey INFORMATION ONLY: (will not be reported or discussed) 12. Greater Spokane, Inc. Report 13. SCRAPS (Spokane County Regional Animal Protection Service) 14. Interstate Signage 15. Response to Public Comments 16. Department Reports EXECUTIVE SESSION n/a ADJOURNMENT General Meeting Schedule (meeting schedule is always subject to change) Regular Council meetings are generally held every Tuesday beginning at 6:00 mm. The Formal meeting fonnats are eg nerally held the 2 d and 4 th Tuesdays. Fonnal meeting have time allocated for general public comments as well as comments after each action item. The Study Session formats (the less formal meeting) are eg nerally held the 1 " 3rd and sometimes 5 "'. Tuesdays. Study Session formats DO NOT have time allocated for general public comments; but if action items are included, comments are pennitted after those specific action items. NOTICE: Individuals planning to attend the meeting who require special assistance to accommodate physical, hearing, or other impairments, please contact the City Clerk at (509) 921 -1000 as soon as possible so that arrangements may be made. Council Agenda 06 -29 -10 Regular Meeting Page 2 of 2 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: 06 -29 -2010 City Manager Sign -off: Item: Check all that apply: ® consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Approval of the Following Vouchers: VOUCHER LIST DATE WNOUCHER NUMBERS: TOTAL AMOUNT 05/27/2010 20278 -20306 $87,432.76 06/04/2010 3162 -3164 $54,407.37 06/08/2010 3172 -3185; 20314 -20319 $204,648.83 06/11/2010 20320 - 20375; 527100023, 528100037, 604100027 $1,842,674.78 06/11/2010 20376 -20416 $87,420.86 06/17/2010 20417 - 20446; 611100026; 617100023 $494,540.56 06/17/2010 3187 -3189 $59,242.14 GRAND TOTAL $2,830,367.30 RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Approve claims for vouchers as listed above. BUDGETIFINANCIAL IMPACTS: STAFF CONTACT: Ken Thompson, Finance Director ATTACHMENTS Voucher Lists Vchlist Voucher List Page: 1 03/27/2010 3 :45 :56PM Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 20278 5/27/2010 002320 BARTLEfT, STEVE REFUND CRY WOLF REFUND 25.00 Total: 25.00 20279 5/27/2010 000863 CENTURY WEST ENG CORP 231703 42555 10 -011 DESIGN ROW C1P 0063 8,155.85 Total: 8,153.85 20280 512712010 000026 CONTRACT RESOURCE GROUP INC 100138 -0 42557 PERMIT CENTER LOBBY RECONFI( 3,842.61 Total : 3,842.61 20281 5/27/2010 002318 DELATORRE, MIGUEL & ROBERTA REFUND CRY WOLF REFUND 25.00 Total : 23.00 20282 5112712010 000734 DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION RE- 313- ATB00511057 STATE ROUTE ROADWAY MA1NT. 13,698.45 RE- 313- ATB00511063 SIGNAL & ILLUMINATION MAIN 12,278.42 RE -313- ATB00511073 INTELLIGENT TRAFFIC SYSTEMS 200.76 Total: 26,177.63 20283 5/27/2010 000422 DISHMAN DODGE INC DOCS219876 VEHICLE INSPECTION: 40205D 20.60 Total : 20.60 20284 5/27/2010 000645 ECONORTHWEST 20216 -A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES: PLANP 1,970.00 Total : 1,970.00 20285 5/27/2010 001447 FREE PRESS PUBLISHING INC 34108 LEGAL PUBLICATION 246.75 34112 LEGAL PUBLICATION 90.10 34113 LEGAL PUBLICATION 27.20 34147 LEGAL PUBLICATION 51.20 34149 LEGAL PUBLICATION 93.50 34150 LEGAL PUBLICATION 97.75 Total : 606.50 20286 5/27/2010 001009 GOTHMANN, WILLIAM EXPENSES MILEAGE FOR APRIL -MAY 2010: G( 436.50 Total : 436.50 20287 5/27/2010 000022 INLAND BUSINESS PRODUCTS, INC_ 57430 EMPLOYEE PHOTO ID'S HR 39.13 Total : 39 -13 Page: 'I vchlist Voucher List Page: 2 0512712010 3:45:56PM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # DescriptionlAccount Amount 20288 5/27/2010 000265 JACKSON, MIKE JUNE 2010 MONTHLY AUTO ALLOWANCE 400.00 Total : 400.00 20289 5/27/2010 001602 KNUTSON, KEN EXPENSES CONTRUCTION MANAGEMENT CLJ 430.90 Total : 430.90 20290 5/27/2010 002319 KRANK, LORRAINE REFUND CRY WOLF REFUND 25.00 Total : 25.00 20291 5/27/2010 000290 NORTHWEST MAP SERVICE 101032749 2010 SPOKANE CITYICOUNTY ATU 450.50 Total: 450.50 20292 5/27/2010 000652 OFFICE DEPOT INC. 518578024001 OFFICE SUPPLIES: ADM1N 18.06 Total. 18.06 20293 5/27/2010 002285 SKINFILL, LINDSEY EXPENSES AWC HEALTH ACADEMY: SKINFILL 355.07 Total : 355.07 20294 5/27/2010 000230 SPOKANE CO AUDITORS OFFICE APRIL 2010 RECORDING FEES 679.00 Total : 679.00 20295 5/27/2010 000172 SPOKANE CO ENGINEER VLY1004 COUNTY SERVICES 38,387.11 Total : 38,387.11 20296 5/27/2010 001100 SPOKANE CO SHERIFF'S OFFICE March 17, 2010 CHILD CAR SEAT EMPHASIS GRAB 1,530.78 Total : 1,530.78 20297 5/27/2010 000406 SPOKANE REGIONAL CVB 2223 CTA RENEWAL: R. WYATT 10.00 Total : 10.00 20298 5/27/2010 000311 SPRINT 326088106 -030 WAPS FOR LAPTOPS 439.89 959698810 -030 SPRINT CELL PHONES 576.25 Total : 1,016.14 20299 5/27/2010 000065 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAGE 8015398654 OFFICE SUPPLIES 656.98 Total : 656.98 20300 5/27/2010 001969 SUNSHINE DISPOSAL 0026021002 APRIL 2010 RENT 163.05 Page: 2 vchlist Voucher List Page: 3 05/27/2010 3:45:56PM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description /Account Amount 20300 5/27/2010 001969 001969 SUNSHINE DISPOSAL (Continued) Total : 163.05 20301 5/27/2010 002321 TAMERON JEWELRY REFUND CRY WOLF REFUND 35.00 20302 5/27/2010 000335 TIRE -RAMA 20303 5/27/2010 001660 TITAN TRUCK EQUIP 20304 5/27/2010 002254 TOWEY, TOM 20305 5/27/2010 001464 TW TELECOM 20306 5/27/2010 001792 WHITEHEAD, JOHN 29 Vouchers for bank code: apbank 29 Vouchers in this report 1, the undersigned, do certify under penalty of perjury, that the materials have been furnished, the services rendered, or the labor performed as described herein and that the daim isjust, due and an unpaid obligation against the City of Spokane Valley, and that I am authorized to authenticate and certify to said claim_ Finance Director Date Total : 8080005287 SNOW TIRE CHANGEOVER: 389041 8080005442 OIL CHANGE: 40208D 8080005512 OIL CHANGE: 06769D 958157 EXPENSES 03564290 EXPENSES Total : 05 DODGE TRUCK REPARIS: 40201 Total : MILEAGE MAY 2010: TOWEY Total INTERNET/DATA LILNES/PHIONE L Total : AWC LABOR RELATIONS INSTITUT Total Bank total Total vouchers: 35.00 58.70 36.20 181.74 276.64 380.45 380.45 122.50 122.50 984.71 984.71 212.05 212.05 87,432.76 87,432.76 Page: 3 vchlist 06/04120/0 9:07:47AM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: 9 Bankcode: apbank Voucher date Vendor invoice PO # DescriptionlAccount Amount 3162 5/20/2010 000048 VANTAGE TRANSFER AGENTS, 401A PLAN Ben33510 401A: Payment 25,540.32 Total: 25,540.32 3163 5/20/2010 000682 EFTPS Ben33512 FEDERAL TAXES: Payment 25,225.09 Total: 25,225.09 3164 5/20/2010 000145 VANTAGEPOINT TRANSFER AGENTS, 457 PL Ben33514 457 DEFERRED COMPENSATION: Payn 3,641.96 Total: 3,641.96 3 Vouchers for bank code: apbank Bank total : 54,407.37 3 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers: 54,407.37 1, the undersigned, do certify under penalty of per;Jry, that the materials have been fumished, the services rendered, or the labor performed as described herein and that the claim is just, due and an unpaid obligation against the City of Spokane Valley, and that 1 am authorized to authenticate and certify to said claim. Finance Director Date Page: 1 vchlist 06/08/2010 9,58:23AM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: 1 Bankcode: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO* DescriptionlAccount Amount 3172 614!2010 000048 VANTAGE TRANSFER AGENTS, 401A PLAN Ben33633 401 A: Payment 26,632.14 Total : 26,632.14 3173 6/4/2010 000682 EFTPS Ben33635 FEDERAL TAXES: Payment 27,233.42 Total : 27,233.42 3174 6/4/2010 000145 VANTAGEPOINT TRANSFER AGENTS, 457 PL Ben33637 457 DEFERRED COMPENSATION: Payr 3,675.47 Total : 3,675.47 3185 6/4/2010 000682 EFTPS Ben33641 FEDERAL TAXES: Payment 1,187.32 Total : 1,187.32 20314 6/212010 000165 DEPT OF RETIREMENT SYSTEMS Ben33625 PERS: Payment 42,465.75 Total : 42,465.75 20315 6!4!2010 000120 AWC Ben33623 HEALTH PLANS: PAYMENT 94,186.21 Ben33639 HEALTH PLANS (COUNCIL): PAYMENT 5,453.32 Total : 99,639.53 20316 6/4/2010 001169 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Ben33621 MISC DED: DAVENPORTRHOLTEN PEF 331.86 Total: 331.86 20317 6/4/2010 001896 DANIEL H BRUNNER Ben33631 HOLTEN, M 07- 03752- PCW13: Payment 100.00 Total: 100.00 20318 6/4/2010 002227 IDAHO TAX COMMISSION Ben33627 IDAHO STATE TAX BASE: Payment 1,275.91 Total : 1,275.91 20319 6/4/2010 000699 WA COUNCIL COICITY EMPLOYEES Ben33629 UNION DUES: Payment 2,107.43 Total: 2,107.43 10 Vouchers for bank code : apbank Bank total : 204,648.53 10 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers : 204,648.83 Page: 1 vchlist Voucher List Page: 1 06/1112010 12:17 :11 PM Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # DescriptionlAccount Amount 20320 6/11/2010 000197 AIRFACTZ 43791 BACKGROUND CHECKS: HR 220.00 Total : 220.00 20321 6/11/2010 000150 ALLIED FIRE & SECURITY 215854 KEYS: CENTERPLACE 25.75 Total : 25.75 20322 611112010 001081 ALSCO LSP081813 FLOOR MATS :CITY HALL 26.21 Total : 26.21 20323 6111/2010 001715 AMERICAN RED CROSS May 2010 ADULT CPR/FIRST AID 352.00 Total: 352.00 20324 6/11/2010 001012 ASSOC BUSINESS SYSTEMS 408227 COPIER COSTS: LEGAL 22.69 408304 COPIER COSTS: CD 106.96 Total: 129.65 20325 6/11/2010 000694 AVISTA UTILITIES 18501 LICENSES: CD & PW 3,080.16 Total : 3,080.16 20326 6/11/2010 002326 BATTERIES PLUS 248 -89428 BATTERY FOR ELEVATOR: CP 80.35 248 -90421 MAINTENANCE PARTS: CP 121.64 Total : 201.99 20327 6/11/2010 000168 BLACK BOX NETWORK SVC 172161 TELEWORKER UPGRADE 1,150.32 Total : 1,150.32 20328 6/11/2010 002324 BRODWATER, RYAN EXPENSES TRAVEL REIMBURSEMENT: BRODI 65.55 Total : 65.55 20329 6/11/2010 001388 CARTEGRAPH SYSTEMS INC R -06555 CARTEGRAPH PAVEPLUS & MAP E 1,800.00 Total: 1,800.00 20330 6/11/2010 000863 CENTURY WEST ENG CORP 231702 42543 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CINTL 8,380.48 Total : 8,380.48 20331 6/11/2010 001888 COMCAST 8498390050988390 HIGH SPEED INTERNET 108.95 Page: 1 vchlist Voucher List Page: 2 06/11/2010 12 :17:11PM Spokane Valley Bank code : Voucher apbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description /Account Amount 20331 6/11/2010 001888 001888 COMCAST (Continued) Total: 108.95 20332 6/11/2010 001157 COUNTRY HOMES POWER EQUIP 514973 42526 2010 SMALL TOOLS & EQUIP 178.79 Total : 178.79 20333 6/11/2010 001926 DAVENPORT, SARAH EXPENSES TRAVELIMILEAGE EXPENSE: DAVE 72.44 Total : 72.44 20334 6/11/2010 000683 DAVID EVANS & ASSOCIATES 290556 42571 AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL 7,559.50 Total : 7,559.50 20335 6/11/2010 000912 DEX MEDIA WEST May 2010 ADVERTISING: CP 242.10 Total : 242.10 20336 6/11/2010 001771 DOLLAR RENT A CAR May 2010 CAR RENTALS 959.48 Total : 959.48 20337 6/11/2010 000278 DRISKELL, CARY EXPENSES MILEAGE EXPENSES: DRISKELL 63.90 Total : 63.90 20338 6/11/2010 002308 FINKE, MELISSA MAY 2010 DANCE LESSONS 286.35 Total : 286.35 20339 6/11/2010 001447 FREE PRESS PUBLISHING INC 85283 LEGAL PUBLICATION 21.90 Total : 21.90 20340 6/11/2010 002076 GINNO CONSTRUCTION OF IDAHO Payment #9 42434 DISCOVERY PARK CONSTRUCTIO] 66,241.35 Total : 66, 241.35 20341 6/11/2010 001253 GORDON THOMAS HONEYWELL MAY 101042 LOBBYIST SERVICES 3,361.37 Total : 3,361.37 20342 6/11/2010 000007 GRAINGER 9261358114 42528 2010 SMALL TOOLS & EQUIP 46.53 Total : 46.53 20343 6/11/2010 001905 HERMANN, PHIL EXPENSES TRAVEL EXPENSES: HERMANN 126.26 Total : 126.26 20344 6/11/2010 001728 HP FINANCIAL SERVICES CO APRIL 2010 LEASE PYMT 2,441.42 Page: 2 vchlist Voucher List Page: 3 06111/2010 12:17:11 PM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description /Account Amount 20344 6/11/2010 001728 HP FINANCIAL SERVICES CO (Continued) JUNE 2010 LEASE PYMT 2,441.42 MAY 2010 LEASE PYMT 2,441.42 Total : 7,324.26 20345 6/11/2010 000022 INLAND BUSINESS PRODUCTS, INC. 57443 EMPLOYEE PHOTO ID'S HR 23.91 57450 EMPLOYEE PHOTO ID'S HR 39.13 Total : 63.04 20346 6/11/2010 002323 INTERPRETIVE EXHIBITS, INC. 2297 -1 RHINO PANELS: CP 1,330.00 Total : 1,330.00 20347 6/11/2010 001987 JENKINS, ART EXPENSES TRAVEL EXPENSES:JENKINS 396.45 Total : 396.45 20348 6/11/2010 001684 MARKETING SOLUTIONS NW CP 5/20/2010 Media MARKETING FOR CP 5,457.00 CP 5/202010 P &P MARKETING: CP 1,020.00 Total : 6,477.00 20349 6/11/2010 001279 MCCONVILLE, PATTI EXPENSES MILEAGE EXPENSES: MCCONVILLI 36.00 Total : 36.00 20350 6/11/2010 000258 MICROFLEX INC. 00019309 TAXTOOLS SOFTWARE RENTAL M. 343.83 Total : 343.83 20351 6/11/2010 002325 MITCHELL, JANDON EXPENSES MILEAGE EXPENSES. MITCHELL 45.90 Total : 45.90 20352 6/11/2010 001035 NETWORK DESIGN & MANAGEMENT 18234 MAY 2010: SYSTEM MAINTENANCE 7,481.25 Total : 7,481.25 20353 6/11/2010 001844 NIMRI, RABA EXPENSES TRAVEL EXPENSES: NIMRI 11.55 Total: 11.55 20354 6/11/2010 002327 NORFMA JUNE 2010 NORFMA MEMBERSHIP: HOHMAN 50.00 Total » 50.00 20355 6/11/2010 000652 OFFICE DEPOT INC. 519739575001 OFFICE SUPPLIES: ADMIN 304.88 Page; 3 vchlist Voucher List Page: 4 0611112010 12:17:11PM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 20355 6/11/2010 000652 OFFICE DEPOT INC. (Continued) 519739786001 KITCHEN SUPPLIES 16.85 519808022001 OFFICE SUPPLIES: ADMIN -68.72 519976597001 OFFICE SUPPLIES: PW 48.90 520334391001 OFFICE SUPPLIES: FINANCE 2.77 520437999001 OFFICE SUPPLIES: ADMIN 20.53 520438153001 OFFICE SUPPLIES: ADMIN 15.26 520438154001 OFFICE SUPPLIES: ADMIN 4.92 Total : 345.39 20356 6/11/2010 000027 OFFICE OF THE CODE REVISER 18139 -1 RCW SYPPLEMENT: LEGAL 48.92 Total : 48.92 20357 6/11/2010 000058 OMA MAY 2010 FITNESS EXAM FOR EMPLOYEE 910.00 Total : 910.00 20358 6/11/2010 002243 ORBITCOM 00350771 EITH ERN ET: JUNE 2010 590.00 Total : 590.00 20359 6/11/2010 001604 PACIFIC NW PAPER 114097 COPY PAPER 1,433.75 Total. 1,433.75 20360 6/11/2010 000322 QWEST MAY 2010 PHONE SERVICE: TERRACE VIEW 109.74 Total : 109.74 20361 6/11/2010 000952 RECALL DESTRUCTION SVC 3901183151 DOCUMENT DESTRUCTION 23.14 Total : 23.14 20362 6/11/2010 001317 RICOH AMERICAS CORP 506207850 42582 RICIOH MPC 4000 FOR PERMIT CE 8,525.56 Total : 8,525.56 20363 6/11/2010 000064 SCHIMMELS, GARY EXPENSES MILEAGE EXPENSES: SCHIMMELS 118.00 Total : 118.00 20364 6/11/2010 002328 SCHROEDER, GEORGE AND JOYCE CIP #0088 ROW ACQUISITIONS/BROADWAY 1 8,000.00 Total: 8,000.00 20365 6/11/2010 002021 SHRM 9003343351 MEMBERSHIP: WHITEHEAD 160.00 Page: 4 vc>hlist Voucher List Page: 5 06/11/2010 12 :17 :11PM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Descripbon /Account Amount 20365 6/11/2010 002021 002021 SHRM (Continued) Total 160.00 20366 6/11/2010 002285 SKINFILL, LINDSEY EXPENSES REIMBURSEMENT: SKINFULL 6.88 EXPENSES REIMBURSEMENT FOR RECRUITM 14121 Total : 148.09 20367 6/11/2010 002317 SPECIALTY ASPHALT & CONST 00072210 42591 BNSF RR X -ING ON FLORA SOUTH 2,434.88 Total : 2,434.88 20368 6/11/2010 001100 SPOKANE CO SHERIFF'S OFFICE April 2010 X-52 DUI EMPHASIS GRANT 1,270.68 Total : 1,270.68 20369 6/11/2010 000001 SPOKANE CO TREASURER 51500185 MAY 2010 JAIL HOUSING 35,678.74 51500197 MAY 2010 HOUSING 34,315.00 Total : 69,993.74 20370 6/11/2010 000093 SPOKESMAN - REVIEW 190515 ADVERTISING - HR 973.88 Total : 973.88 20371 6/11/2010 001083 STANDARD PLBG HEATING CONTROLS 27916 REPLACED EXPANSION TANK:CP 2,629.00 Total : 2,629.00 20372 6/11/2010 001250 SYTE NET SERVICES 6859 CABLING MAINT 724.21 Total : 724.21 20373 6/11/2010 000087 VERIZON WIRELESS 6426861699 AIRCRAFT CARDS FOR STREET M) 215.09 Total : 215.09 20374 6/11/2010 000711 WMCA TREASURER WMCA 2010 WMCA MEMBERSHIP:KOUDELKA 8 150.00 Total : 150.00 20375 6/11/2010 000089 XO COMMUNICATIONS 0236670738 INTERNET/DATA LINES: JUNE 201C 248.87 Total : 248.87 527100023 5/28/2010 000497 BANK OF NEW YORK JUNE 2010 JAN 2010: DEBT SVC PYMT 197,511.25 Total : 197,511.25 528100037 5/28/2010 000001 SPOKANE CO TREASURER MAY 2010 MAY 2010 SHERIFF SERVICES 1,266,811.17 Page: 5 Vchlist Voucher List Page: 6 06/1112010 12:17:11 PM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description /Account Amount 528100037 5/28/2010 000001 000001 SPOKANE CO TREASURER (Continued) Total : 9,266,899.17 604100027 6/4/2010 000001 SPOKANE CO TREASURER MAY 2010 SPOKANE COUNTY SERVICES 16103911 59 Vouchers for bank code: apbank 59 Vouchers in this report 1, the undersigned, do certify under penalty of perjury, that the materials have been furnished, the services rendered, or the labor performed as described herein and that the claim is just, due and an unpaid obligation against the City of Spokane Valley, and that I am authorized to authenticate and certify to said claim. Finance Director Cate Total 161,039.11 Bank total : 1,842,674.78 Total vouchers: 1,842,674.78 Page: 6 vchlist Voucher List Page: 1 0611112010 2:22 :45PM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description /Account Amount 20376 6/11/2010 001972 ALL PHAZE INSTRUMENT * SUPPLY 5953 SUPPLIES FOR PUBLIC WORKS 49.89 Total: 49.89 20377 6/11/2010 001308 ALLEN, HENRY Expenses EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 50.07 Total: 50,07 20378 6/11/2010 001081 ALSCO MAY 2010 FLOOR MATS: PRECINCT 39.52 Total : 39.52 20379 6111/2010 000334 ARGUS JANITORIAL LLC INV005023 JANITORIAL SVCS: MAY 2010 PRE( 2,165.23 Total : 2,165.23 20380 6/11/2010 001862 BISCHOFF, PATTY Expenses EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 54.33 Total : 54.33 20381 6/11/2010 000918 BLUE RIBBON LINEN SUPPLY INC 9120483 LINEN SUPPLY FOR CENTERPLACI 196.78 9122371 LINEN SUPPLY AT CENTERPLACE 246.08 9124298 LINEN SUPPLY FOR CENTERPLACI 247.55 50072813 LINEN SUPPLY AT CENTERPLACE 21.32 S0082144 LINEN SUPPLY AT CENTERPLACE 49.00 Total : 760.73 20382 6/11/2010 000815 BNSF RAILROAD CO June 2010 CROSSING GATE DAMAGE 3,136.59 Total : 3,136.59 20383 6/11/2010 000143 CITY OF SPOKANE May 2010 TRANSFER STATION: PW 5.00 Total : 5.00 20384 6/11/2010 000109 COFFEE SYSTEMS INC 3820:054110 COFFEE SYSTEMS FOR CENTERPI 110.50 3820:054142 SERVICE COMPONENT FEE 32.61 Total : 143.11 20385 6/11/2010 000326 CONSOLIDATED IRRIGATION #19 May 2010 UTILITIES: PUBLIC WORKS 113.15 May 2010 UTILITIES: PARKS 459.20 Total : 572.35 20386 6/11/2010 002330 CROSBY, JACK 102 PRESENTATIONS PAYMENTS 100.00 Page: 1 vChlist Voucher list Page: 2 06/11/2010 2:22:45PM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description /Account Amount 20386 6/11/2010 002330 002330 CROSBY, JACK (Continued) Total : 100.00 20387 6/11/2010 001717 DAVIS, JENNIFER Expenses EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 21.45 Total : 21.45 20388 6/11/2010 000246 EAST SPOKANE WATER DIST #1 May 2010 UTILITIES: PUBLIC WORKS 84627 MAY 2010 UTILITIES: PARKS 680.60 Total : 1 ,526.87 20389 6/11/2010 001625 EPIC EVENTS & PROMOTION, INC 595 OUTDOOR CINEMA SVCS FOR JUL 2,800.00 609 OUTDOOR CINEMA SVCS AUG 19, 2,800.00 Total : 5,600.00 20390 6/11/2010 002329 FIRST AMERICAN PAYMENT SYSTEMS June 2010 BANK FEES ON CREDIT CARDS 1,769.71 Total : 1,769.71 20391 6/11/2010 001113 FLOORMART 2769 SUPPLIES FOR CENTERPLACE 216.31 2772 SUPPLIES FOR CENTERPLACE 19.56 Total : 235.87 20392 6/11/2010 000839 GENERAL FIRE EQUIP CO 0006174 FIRE EXTINGUISHER SERVICE: PR 333.71 Total : 333.71 20393 6/11/2010 000011 GREATER SPOKANE VALLEY 204505 MAP 2010 - ADVERTISING 425.00 Total : 425.00 20394 6/11/2010 002196 HOLTEN, MELISSA Expenses EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 14.83 Total : 14.83 20395 6/11/2010 000741 HONEY BUCKETS 1- 131459 HONEY BUCKET RENTAL: PARKS 151.40 Total : 151.40 20396 6/11/2010 000070 INLAND POWER & LIGHT CO May 2010 UTILITIES:PW 473.44 Total : 473.44 20397 6/11/2010 000388 IRVIN WATER DIST. #6 May 2010 UTILITIES: PARKS 166.00 Total: 166.00 20398 6/11/2010 001635 ISS FACILITYIEVENT SERVICES 23005 MAY 2010 - MONTHLY JANITORIAL 7,136.00 Page: 2 vchlist Voucher List Page: 3 06/11/2010 2:22:451 Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher bate Vendor Invoice PO #f Description /Account Amount 20398 6/11/2010 001635 ISS FACILITY/EVENT SERVICES (Continued) 23006 EVENT SVCS; CENTERPLACE 98.50 23054 EVENT SVCS: CENTERPLACE 198.66 23102 EVENT SVCS; CENTERPLACE 97.94 Total : 7,531.10 20399 6/11/2010 OOD635 KUHTA, SCOTT Expenses EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 285.56 Total: 285.56 204DO 6111/2D1 D DDD252 LOWE'S BUSINESS ACCOUNT May 2D1 D OPERATING SUPPLIES: CP 118.39 Total : 118.39 204D1 6111/2D1D DDD910 MANTZ, GLORIA Expenses EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 96.71 Total : 96.71 204D2 6111/2D1D 000073 MCCORMICK, GREG Expenses EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 100-DD Total : 100.00 204D3 6/11/2010 001669 MCGEE, MARY KATE Expenses EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 115.DD Total : 115.00 20404 6/11/2010 000662 NAIL BARRICADE & SIGN CO 68879 42532 2010 SMALL TOOLS & EQUIP 57.07 Total : 57.07 20405 6/11/2010 002182 PEGRAM, ROD Expenses EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 83.85 Total : 83.85 20406 6/11/2010 001860 PLATT 7802511 SUPPLIES FOR CENTERPLACE 96.92 Total : 96.92 20407 6/11/2010 000019 PURRFECT LOGOS, INC. 25785 PARKS & REC POLO SHIRTS 33.48 25819 12 SIGNS: PARKS 417.41 25849 BANNER FOR PARKS 96.20 25871 SIGNAGE FOR PARKS 278.27 Total : 825.36 204D8 6/11/2010 000415 ROSAUERS 639777 SUPPLIES FOR CENTERPLACE 0.89 Page: 3 vchlist Voucher List Page: 4 06/11/2010 2:22:45PM Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor 20408 6/11/2010 000415 000415 ROSAUERS 20409 6/11/2010 000709 SENSKE LAWN & TREE CARE INC. 20410 20411 20412 20413 20414 20415 20416 6/11/2010 000935 SERVICE PAPER CO 6/11/2010 000668 SPOKANE CO TREASURER 6/11/2010 000323 SPOKANE CO UTILITIES 6/11/2010 000324 SPOKANE CO WATER DIST #3 6/11/2010 000167 VERA WATER & POWER 6111!2010 000038 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF SPOKANE Invoice PO # (Continued) 3470004 3751762 42553 3860931 3883773 3888792 42553 110312504 11304696 300468607 30467854 45101.9068 45105.9010 Interest fees June 2010 May 2010 MAY 2010 May 2010 2728963 - 2681 -1 2728964 -2681 -9 2728965 - 2681 -6 6/11/2010 002111 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF SPOKANE JUNE 2010 42546 Desc riptionlAccount Amount Total : 0.89 CONTRACT MAINTENANCE: PARK 44,562.40 2010 EMERG TRAFFIC CONTROL S 530.46 METAL FOR SIGNS ON NEW PLAY( 97.83 CONTRACT MAINTENANCE: PRECI 497.72 2010 EMERG TRAFFIC CONTROL S 84.79 Total : 45,773.20 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES: CP 44.62 SUPPLIES: CP 20.42 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES: CP 35.97 SUPPLIES FOR CENTERPLACE 1,320.81 Total: 1,421.82 2010 SEWER ASSESSMENT 754.84 2010 SEWER ASSESSMENT 2,181.64 INTEREST FEES ON SEWER ASSE 491.38 Total: 3,427.86 SPOKANE COUNTY SEWER - JUNE 1,477.50 Total : 1,477.50 WATER CHARGES: PW 274.52 WATER CHARGES: PARKS 114.87 Total : 389.39 UTILITIES: MAY 2010 2,437.24 Total : 2,437.24 WASTE MGMP CP 733.84 Waste Mgmt Precinct Bldg May 2010 285.27 Waste Management for Maint Facility 173.79 Total : 1,192.90 2010 LEASE ON MAINTENANCE FA 4,195.00 Total : 4,195.00 Page: 4 vchlist Voucher List Page: 5 06/41/2010 2:22:45PM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 41 Vouchers for bank code: apbank 41 Vouchers in this report PO # Description /Account Amount Bank total : 87,420.86 Total vouchers: 87,420.86 I, the undersigned, do certify under penalty of pequry, that the materials have been furnished, the services rendered, or the labor performed as described herein and that the claim is just, due and an unpaid obligation against the City of Spokane Valley, and that I am authorized to authenticate and certify to said claim_ Fnance Director Date Page: 5 vchlist Voucher List page: 1 06/17/2010 4:40 :13PM Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description /Account Amount 20417 6/17/2010 000958 AAA SWEEPING, LLC 44406 42563 2010 AAA VACTORING CONTRACT 20,998.89 44408 42547 2010 STREET SWEEPING CONTRA 50,958.71 Total : 71,957.60 20418 611712010 000648 ABADAN 145857 PLANS & SPECS 890.52 146358 PLANS & SPECS 2,201.28 146359 PLANS & SPECS 96.80 146378 PLANS & SPECS 160.22 Total: 3,348.82 20419 6/17/2010 001873 ACME CONCRETE PAVING INC Pay App #2 42577 BROADWAY SULLIVAN CONSTRUC 272,878.43 Total: 272,878,43 20420 6/17/2010 001081 ALSCO LSPO808509 FLOOR MATS:CITY HALL 27.21 Total : 27.21 20421 6/17/2010 001816 BENTHIN & ASSOCIATES 1582 42943 BROADWAY AVE #0088 144.00 1583 42143 BROADWAY AVE #0088 1,345,00 1584 42465 BROADWAY -SULLIVAN INT SURVE 744.00 1606 42143 BROADWAY AVE #0088 300.00 Total : 2,530.00 20422 6/97/2010 000796 BUDINGER & ASSOC INC M08218 -17 42110 GEOTECH & MATERIALS TESTING 7,213.40 Total: 7,213.40 20423 6/17/2010 000863 CENTURY WEST ENG CORP 231751 42555 10-011 DESIGN ROW C1P 0063 8,992.51 Total: 8,992.59 20424 6/17/2010 001447 FREE PRESS PUBLISHING INC 34233 LEGAL PUBLICATION 73.10 - 34234 LEGAL PUBLICATION 35.70 34235 LEGAL PUBLICATION 62.90 34264 LEGAL PUBLICATION 227.95 Total: 399.65 20425 6/17/2010 000002 H & H BUSINESS SYSTEMS INC. May 2010 COPIER COST 2,125.72 Total: 2,125.72 Page: 9 vchlist Voucher List Page: 2 06/17/2010 4:40:13PM Spokane Valley Hank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # DescriptionlAccount Amount 20426 6/17/2010 000313 INLAND ASPHALT COMPANY INC. Pay App #4 42399 0110 SPRAGUE REHAB 1 - CONSTF 20,170.60 Total: 20,170.60 20427 6/17/2010 000022 INLAND BUSINESS PRODUCTS, INC. 57462 EMPLOYEE PHOTO ID'S HR 23.91 57470 EMPLOYEE PHOTO ID'S HR 23.91 Total : 47.82 20428 6/17/2010 000388 IRVIN WATER DIST. #6 June 2010 UTILITIES: PW 283.11 Total : 283.11 20429 6/17/2010 000864 JUB ENGINEERS, INC. 0064797 PROJECT #70 -09-032: PROFESSIOI 1,256.21 Total : 1,256.21 20430 6/17/2010 001439 K &L GATES LOCKHART 2199478 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 3,562.00 Total : 3,562.00 20431 6/17/2010 000635 KUHTA, SCOTT EXPENSES REIMBUREMENT FOR BOOK: KUH`[ 20.00 Total : 20.00 20432 6/17/2010 001089 POE ASPHALT PAVING, INC. 43249 42551 2010 STREET & STORMWATER MA 49,768.40 Total : 49,768.40 20433 6/17/2010 000019 PURRFECT LOGOS, INC. 25867 VEHICLE MAGNETICS 322.84 Total : 322.84 20434 6/17/2010 002285 SKINFILL, LINDSEY EXPENSE POSTAGE REIMBURSEMENT: SKIN 9.65 Total : 9.65 20435 6/17/2010 000511 SPOKANE CO AUDITOR 531 RJZ RENEWAL LICENSE RENEWAL 531 RJZ 77.75 Total : 77.75 20436 6/17/2010 000090 SPOKANE CO INFO SYSTEMS 5035649 COUNTY IT SUPPORT 16,897.09 Total : 16,897.09 20437 6/17/2010 000459 SPOKANE CO TITLE CO JUNE 2010 BROADWAY AVE RECONSTRUCT]( 217.40 Total : 217.40 20438 6/17/2010 000001 SPOKANE CO TREASURER 11001635 INSPECTIONS ON WEST FARMS S] 399.54 Page: 2 vchlist Voucher List Page: 3 0611712010 4:40:13PM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 20438 6/17/2010 000001 SPOKANE CO TREASURER (Continued) 51500213 MAY 2010: WORK CREW 5,829.18 Total : 6,228.72 20439 6/17/2010 000323 SPOKANE CO UTILITIES June 2010 SPOKANE COUNTY SEWER - JUNE 120.20 Total : 120.20 20440 6/17/2010 000898 SPOKANE PROCARE 2010 -05 42538 2010 LANDSCAPING CONTRACT #1 11,966.34 Total: 11,966.34 20441 6/17/2010 000140 WALTS MAILING SERVICE JUNE 2010 SULLIVAN COORIDOR POSTCARD 1,736.30 Total : 1,736.30 20442 6/17/2010 000038 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF SPOKANE 0051094 - 1518 -1 WASTE MGMT: PW 5,536.60 Total : 5,536.60 20443 6/17/2010 000676 WEST 820709743 LEGAL SUBSCRIPTION 615.57 Total : 615.57 20444 6/17/2010 002177 WYATT, ROXANNE EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT FOR BANQUET: 15.00 Total : 15.00 20445 6/17/2010 000487 YMCA OF THE INLAND NW JUNE 2010 SUMMER DAY CAMP FIELD TRIP El 236.00 Total : 236.00 20446 6/17/2010 001885 ZAYO BANDWIDTH LLC June 2010 DARK FIBER LEASE 228.27 Total: 228.27 611100026 6/11/2010 002244 AOT PUBLIC SAFETY CORPORATION SPKVLY 05 CRY WOLF CAARGES: APRIL 2010 3,258.14 Total : 3,258.14 617100023 6/17/2010 002244 AOT PUBLIC SAFETY CORPORATION SPKVLY 06 CRY WOLF CHARGES: MAY 2010 2,493.21 Total: 2,493.21 32 Vouchers for bank code: apbank Bank total : 494,540.56 32 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers: 494,540.56 Page: 3 vchlist Voucher List Page: 1 06/17/2010 11:08:55AM Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 3187 6/18/2010 000048 VANTAGE TRANSFER AGENTS, 401A PLAN Ben33799 3188 3189 6/18/2010 000682 EFTPS Ben33801 6/18/2010 000145 VANTAGEPOINT TRANSFER AGENTS, 457 PL Ben33803 3 Vouchers for bank code* apbank 3 Vouchers in this report [, the undersigned, do certify under penalty of perjury, that the materials have been fumished, the services rendered, or the labor performed as described herein and that the claim is just, due and an unpaid obligation against the City of Spokane Valley, and that I am authorized to authenticate and certify to said claim. Finance Director Date PO # Description /Account Amount 401A: Payment 26,723.78 Total: 26,723.78 FEDERAL TAXES: Payment 28,779.11 Total: 28,779.11 457 DEFERRED COMPENSATION: Payr 3,739.25 Total: 3,739.25 Bank total : 59,242.14 Total vouchers : 59,242.14 Page: 1 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: 06 -29 -10 City Manager Sign -off: Item: Check all that apply: ® consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Payroll for Period Ending June 15, 2010 GOVERNING LEGISLATION: PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: BACKGROUND: OPTIONS: RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: BUDGET /FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Budget /Financial impacts: Gross: $ 230,269.82 Benefits: $ 29,864.16 Total payroll $ 260,133.98 STAFF CONTACT: Raba Nimri ATTACHMENTS 1 : • vm MINUTES City of Spokane Valley City Council Regular Meeting Formal Meeting Format Tuesday, June 8, 2010 Mayor Towey called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. Attendance: City Staff Tom Towey, Mayor Mike Jackson, Acting City Manager Gary Schimmels, Deputy Mayor Mike Connelly, City Attorney Bill Gothmann, Councilmember Ken Thompson, Finance Director Dean Grafos, Councilmember Neil Kersten, Public Works Director Brenda Grassel Councilmember Kathy McClung, Community Development Dir. Lori Barlow, Associate Planner Absent: Karen Kendall, Assistant Planner Rose Dempsey, Councilmember Greg McCormick, Planning Manager Bob McCaslin, Councilmember Mike Stone, Parks & Recreation Director Mike Basinger, Senior Planner Carolbelle Branch, Public Information Officer Greg Bingaman, IT Specialist Chris Bainbridge, City Clerk INVOCATION: Pastor James Kashork of Holy Trinity Lutheran Church gave the invocation. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Mayor Towey led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL: City Clerk Bainbridge called the roll, all councihnembers were present except Councilmembers Dempsey and McCaslin. It was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels, seconded and unanimously agreed to excuse Councilmembers Dempsey andMcCashn from tonight's meeting. APPROVAL OF AMENDED AGENDA: It was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels, seconded and unanimously agreed to approve the agenda. INTRODUCTION OF SPECIAL GUESTS AND PRESENTATIONS: COMMITTEE, BOARD, LIAISON SUMMARY REPORTS: Councilmember Gothmann: reported he attended a SNAP meeting. Councilmember Grafos reported he attended the Spokane Transit Authority (STA) meeting where they discussed collections year -to -date, and said there was a slight improvement last month over the previous month's decrease; but comparing 2008 revenues to 2010 revenues, said we are still about 10% behind or a $165,000 decrease in the general fund; and said he hopes to address some of these issues at the summer retreat. Deputy Mayor Schimmels: reported that he attended a few subcommittee meetings, such as the STA Operations Committee; the SRTC (Spokane Regional Transportation Council) meeting, and the Solid Waste Liaison Board Meeting. Councilmember Grassel: no report. MAYOR'S REPORT: Mayor Towey stated that he participated with others across the state in a run to support Special Olympics. Council Regular Meeting 6 -08 -2010 Page 1 of 7 Approved by Council: 1 : • vm PUBLIC COMMENTS: Mayor Towev invited general public comments. Margaret Mortz, 3420 S Ridgeview Dr : said she has professional experience in data analysis, and did some number crunching concerning the data for the Broadway accidents, and summarized her handout of the methodology used, adding that there were two severe winters after Broadway was restriped to three lanes; she went over accidents from leaving a driveway and intersection accidents and concluded that since Broadway is a residential arterial, the reduction in driveway accidents by adding the center buffer lane is important and she recommended we complete the conversion of Broadway to three lanes west of Pines. Marc Miens, 15127 E 26 Avenue, 99206 he urged council to continue as planned with the Broadway safety project; said it seems there are a lot of misconceptions about where bikes belong and he stressed they belong and have a right to the roads and they are considered a valid vehicle; said he feels it is not appropriate as some suggested, to have bicyclists ride on sidewalks and said it is illegal to do so in many areas as it puts pedestrians at risk, he said this is not so much as issue of where bikes belong but a safety issue for the citizens using the roadways; he said there are some deep stone drain grates in the traffic lane, and if a cyclist rides close to the curb, their bike tire could actually get caught in the stonngrate which has the potential of causing serious injury; and he asked if the cycling community organized a community ride and provided councilmembers with bikes and helmets, would they be willing to take a tour on the roads to see what the issues are, and said he'd be willing to entertain that. Leonard Byrne 1302 N Skipworth Court, 99206: said he has lived here 35 _years, and 32 of those have been within one mile of this office; said this is his neighborhood; and he spoke in favor of moving ahead with the Broadway safety project; he said the only place he's ever seen accidents were at the corner of Broadway and Bowdish and Broadway and University, and said those intersections very unsafe, and said left turns off Broadway onto Bowdish or University are unsafe and there have been t -bone accidents there, and he pleaded to have it re- striped; he said Broadway east of Pines is wonderful while Broadway west of pines is an accident waiting to happen. Dan Robbins, Evergreen State Towing, 6511 N PeM Spokane, 99217 said he wanted to talk about changing our municipal code; that he wants to open a towing and recovery business in Spokane Valley, said he has support from the County Sheriff, the Washington State Patrol, and the landowner, said the property is zoned industrial and he was infonned that he would need to pave any property in the Valley; he said paving /developing properties would not be cost effective to his company and he would like to create jobs in Spokane Valley. City Manager Jackson said staff will research his concerns and report back to Mr. Robbins and to council. Ray Ward 13404 E 9 th Avenue, 99216: spoke about his concerns of allowing commercially licensed highway trucks and trailers in residential neighborhoods overnight and on weekends, and he asked if there is an ordinance to keep them out of neighborhoods; and said Millwood and the City of Spokane don't allow those trucks in residential neighborhoods. City Manager Jackson said we do not have an ordinance that prohibits that, and staff can research that and report back to Mr. Ward and to council. 1. CONSENT AGENDA Consists of items considered routine which are approved as a group. Any member of Council may ask that an item be removed from the Consent Agenda to be considered separately. a. Approval of the following claim vouchers: VOUCHER LIST DATE W/VOUCHER NUMBERS: TOTAL AMOUNT 5/19/2010 5023 - 5029 $829.00 5/21/2010 20240 - 20267 $537,182.79 Council Regular Meeting 6 -08 -2010 Page 2 of 7 Approved by Council: 1 : •VW 5/21/2010 20268 - 20277 $32,608.26 5/28/2010 20307 - 20313 $46,993.79 GRAND TOTAL $617,613.84 b. Approval of Payroll for Period Ending May 31, 2010: $349,855.32 c. Approval of Formal Council Meeting Minutes of May 11, 2010 d. Approval of Study Session Meeting Minutes of May 18, 2010 e. Approval of Formal Council Meeting Minutes of May 25, 2010 f. Approval of Study Session Meeting Minutes of June 1, 2010 It was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels, seconded and unanimously agreed to approve the consent agenda. NEW BUSINESS: 2. First Readina Proposed Ordinance Vacating Street (W of 16 and Kahuna) (STV 01 -10) — Karen Kendall After City Clerk Bainbridge read the ordinance title, it was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels and seconded to advance the ordinance to a second reading. Planner Kendall explained the proposal as per her PowerPoint presentation, and mentioned that the conditions recommended by the Planning Commission are included in the ordinance language. Mayor Towey invited public comment; no comments were offered. Vote by Acclamation: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed: None. Abstentions: None. Motion carried. 3. First Reading Proposed Ordinance CTA 02 -10 Code Text Amendments — Lori Barlow After City Clerk Bainbridge read the ordinance title, it was moved by Councilmember Gothmann and seconded to advance the proposed code amendments to a second reading of the ordinance at the June 15, 2010 council meeting. Planner Barlow gave a PowerPoint presentation addressing the batch code amendments, and said proposed changes include changing language to Chapter 17.20 to clarify that the developer is responsible to meet all code requirements, adding a reasonable use exception to the critical areas chapter 21.40, and amending Chapter 2130.120 to be consistent with the most current Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps; adding that all three are city - initiated code text amendments, but the first two were as a result of a 2009 review by the Washington Cities Auditor's office that suggested these changes would better protect the city as it adds liability language. Mayor Towey invited public comment. Margaret Mortz said there was a problem in the South Hill area where a developer bought a package of land knowing it was marsh and he filled it, which led to large number of lawsuits so she feels this is good change; but said the section that states that the city planner has sole discretion seems unbalanced when talking about critical areas, and said perhaps this should be done by a consultant such as someone from the Department of Natural Resources, who have experts in critical areas rather than just have this a purely political process. Dick Behm, 3626 S Ridgeview Drive: said he filed the appeal for the revision of the Chester Creek floodplain in 2000 and at that time had no idea it would take ten years to accomplish; and he said he came here to thank staff, former staff member Marina Sukup; and current staff Deanna Griffith who kept people notified of the process, and said the result of the revision is removal of hundreds of homes from the floodplain which is immense for insurance purposes; and he again thanked staff for keeping people informed and for following through. In turn, Councilmember Gothmann thanked Mr. Behm for pursuing this. Vote by Acclamation: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed: None. Abstentions: None. Motion carried. 4. Motion Consideration: ACCepting Collaborative Plannina Agreement — Mike Basinger It was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels and seconded to authorize the City Manager or designee to sign the agreement for services related to complete the collaborative planning effort. Planner Basinger said he provided a brief overview and rationale of this at the May 4 council meeting; and said the Collaborative Planning committee requests that the metropolitan cities make a financial commitment based on population, to identify a fiscally sustainable revenue and service delivery structure for Spokane Council Regular Meeting 6 -08 -2010 Page 3 of 7 Approved by Council: 1 : • vm County; and that Spokane Valley's contribution would be $10,000, which could be taken from our general fund, thus reducing the carryover fund at the end of the year by $10,000. Mayor Towey invited public comment; no comments were offered. Councilmember Grassel asked if council would get a report at the end of the project, and Mr. Basinger said the consultant will provide a report to all the cities in working toward the goal of having a better understanding of some of the efficiencies that could be made in Spokane County. Vote by Acclamation: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed: None. Abstentions: None. Motion carried. 5. Motion Consideration: Mayoral Appointment to NE Washington Housing Solution Board of Commissioners — Mayor Towey Mayor Towey explained that there is an opening on the NE Washington Housing Solution Board of Commissioners, and he proposed to appoint Jack Beeching to the board, and noting Mr. Beeching in the audience, thanked him for his willingness to service in that capacity. It was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels and seconded to confirm the Mayoral appointment of Jack Beeching to the Northeast Washington Housing Solutions Board of Commissioners, for a term beginning immediately and ending 12!3112014. Mayor Towey invited public comment; no comments were offered. Vote by Acclamation: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed: None. Abstentions: None. Motion carried. Mayor Towey also extended thanks to outgoing board member Judy Butler for her past service of five years. 6. Motion Consideration: Broadcasting Options — Greg Bingainan It was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels and seconded to authorize the City Manager or designee to enter into and execute a month -to -month agreement with Community Minded Television for the broadcasting of City Council meetings. As a matter of disclosure, Councilmember Gothmann said he has given $3,000 over the past six months to this effort through the SVBA (Spokane Valley Business Association) to CMTV (Community Minded Television), and spent $240.00 of his own funds for production and distribution of the DVDs. Information Technology Specialist Bingaman explained that as per his Request for Council Action Fonn, council can continue this arrangement with CMTV on a month - to -month basis for $3,000 per month, regardless of the number of monthly meetings; and at council direction after Council's retreat, other options could be pursued. It was also noted these funds will come from the general fund. Mayor Towey invited public comment. Robert Foote, General Manager for CMTV thanked council for the opportunity, and said he is willing to reduce costs over time if possible, and hopes this will be a rewarding relationship for all. Peggy Doering, E 11522 Sunview Circle asked what happened with Comcast, and said she hopes this month -to -month will continue so we won't lose access to channels, and Mr. Jackson replied that the Comcast issue will be discussed later on tonight's agenda. Dick Behm, 3405 E Sprague, for Spokane Valley Business Association said this has been a rewarding experience in sponsoring this program, and appreciates Council picking this up. Councilmember Grassel stated that the support is for the short term as she wants to look at all available options at the retreat, and said we need to focus on the Internet as well, and she would like to look at competitive bids for the television production. Mr. Jackson explained that the retreat will discuss the budget and some of that discussion will be how it relates to broadcasting, but the retreat will not include an exhaustive discussion on broadcasting, as council can address that at a later time. Vote by Acclamation: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed: None. Abstentions: None. Motion carried. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Mayor Towey invited general public comments. No comments were offered. Mayor Towey called for a short recess at 6:56 p.m. and reconvened the meeting at 7:11 p.m. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS 7. Public, Educational, Government (PEG) Funding — Cary Driskell Deputy City Attorney Driskell explained the issues and potential consequences of a proposed motion that Council asked staff to draft, concerning cessation of the collection of public, educational and governmental (PEG) funds through the Comcast franchise, and said that franchise was originally Council Regular Meeting 6 -08 -2010 Page 4 of 7 Approved by Council: 1 : • vm negotiated, written and adopted in contemplation of collecting the PEG fees, and continued to explain that it opens the possibility of Comcast wanting to negotiate other items in the franchise; that the .35¢ per month per subscriber was also adopted in language in the City Code 3.65, and if the City seeks to suspend collection of the PEG fees through the franchise, it must also amend the Code; that the franchise and the Code require the City enter into contracts with any entities that would provide PEG channel programming through the franchise, and this would include Channel 14, and Spokane District 81, Gonzaga, University of Washington, Washington State University, Eastern Washington University, and the Community Colleges of Spokane (channels 15 -19). Mr. Driskell said the City of Spokane has executed contracts with CMTV, CCS and District 81; and Spokane's contracts include payment of PEG fees to each entity; and when Spokane Valley negotiates with these entities, they may require funds to sign an agreement, and if we cannot agree on contract terms with each entity, Comcast could rely on the terms of the franchise and the City Code and refuse to provide those channels because there would be no contract, which could be very problematic for residents who rely on those channels to take college classes. Mr. Driskell said an option might be to re- negotiate section 13.2 of the franchise and said he would present that as part of next week's motion. Mr. Driskell said a question was posed to him if Comcast is required to have those channels, and in response Mr. Driskell said federal law only states channel capacity be designated for PEG, but doesn't require any more than that; and said a FCC interpretation of that act is that cable companies don't need to provide that but government entities can negotiate for capital funding, which he explained is what we did; we negotiated a governmental channel, that channel is dark now but the capacity is there; and he explained that we could use PEG funds for capital needs but they would not be required to pay for broadcasting in Spokane Valley; and similarly for Education, there is no obligation that Comcast provide that. Councilmember Gothmann said that the Community College is reimbursed by Comcast after presenting a bill for capital equipment. Mr. Driskell said in the franchise, there is the opportunity for Comcast to give us a certain amount of funds for PEG fees; and if we don't spend up to the amount in the franchise, Comcast could come back and reduce the PEG collection by a certain amount; and he said it is not intended to be a hard cap but tailored to needs. 8. SARP (Subarea Plan) Report to Council re Public Meeting Comments — Lori Barlow Planner Barlow explained that this discussion continues as part of Council's review of the Gateway Commercial Avenue and Gateway Center Zoning Districts within the Subarea Plan; she gave a re -cap of the May 20, 2010 public meeting and of the process used to advertise for and hold the meeting; and via her PowerPoint presentation, went over the areas of concern as a result of the meeting, and asked that Council keep the following in mind for each concern: to send an issue to the Planning Commission as a code text amendment; identify which direction staff should take, something to add to the annual docket for annual comprehensive plan amendments, the option of taking no action, and to provide other direction to staff. In response to Mayor Towey's statement that it appears all except one issue are code text amendments, City Attorney Connelly said some of that could change once council specifically directs staff further, and to keep in mind that Council has already by motion placed the whole subarea plan on the docket. City Manager Jackson added that staff will shape tonight's direction into a straightforward motion so all will be clear on the issues to vote upon before Council at their next meeting. The following are the issues presented and the direction for each issue: Issue 91: Maximum Front Setbacks (vehicle display options) Send to Planning Commission to have them consider reducing or extending or eliminating the setback distance; they to have that discussion and consider all options. City Attorney Connelly said after sending these to the Planning Commission, then we can look at those issues under the comp plan under these two different zones. Issue 42: Free Standing Sign Limits on Double Frontage Lots Send to Planning Commission to examine ways to increase signage within the current sign code. Council Regular Meeting 6 -08 -2010 Page 5 of 7 Approved by Council: "It MW Issue #3: Reduction in Uses Fashion a motion for the Planning Commission then look at other options for doing the whole comp plan. Issue 94: Accessory Structures Council consensus to clarify in the code that accessory structures not impacted. Issue #5 & 6: Minimum Building Frontage Requirement Comp plan change: eliminate the requirement that buildings frontage greater than 50% of the lot width in the Gateway Commercial Center; and greater than 30% of lot width in the Gateway Commercial Avenue. Issue #7: Trees versus Signne It was determined that signage issues will be addressed later. Issue #8: Development Regulations on Double Frontage Lots City Attorney Connelly said the five -acre maximum and building orientation likely intertwines with the comp plan and should probably be best addressed when they get to that area; so staff will add this to the list of things to discuss when we go through the comp plan. Issue #9: Signage Related to Brand Requirements Examine the issue of wall signs 15% instead of 25% and that wall signs are now only allowed below the second floor. City Attorney Connelly suggested those could be addressed as part of the package to send to the Planning Commission. 910 Replacing Non - Conforming Structures /Use The question arose to consider this totally for the SARP or wait until we get to other zones, and Council determined to wait until we get to other zones. In other discussion, Councilmember Grassel asked about the 80% destruction of a building and if that could be 100% building destruction for the entire city, and Attorney Connelly explained that if we change that regulation to 100 %, the nonconforming uses would continue forever; which is not the intent, and said Council's opinion could change once we get to the mixed use are; that Council could examine 100% just in the subarea plan, but we would not apply that regulation city -wide. 9. Advance A eg nda Councilmember Gothmann mentioned last summer's swimming scholarship fund for local people and of the need to provide that again this summer, and Mr. Jackson said that has been set up and an information item will be included in next week's council packet on that topic. It was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels, seconded and unanimously agreed to extend the meeting to 9:30 p. m. Councilmember Grafos read the following statement: "Mr. Mayor: Councilman Gothman presented us with over 60 examples of one way versus two way road conversions from across the United States, Australia and Canada. These road conversion from one way to two way seem to have one common characteristic. They are examples within downtown City Centers. However, for the City of Spokane Valley the creation of the Valley Mall has shifted the Economic Center of the City (a place where we buy goods and services) to the Sullivan Rd /Mirabeau Park Area. It has also shifted the Community center of the City to the Mirabeau Park area. Our Community Life is alive and well and this fact is evident when our citizens speak of CENTERPLACE, its community orientated activities, its parks and events, now the Discovery Playground. This is our City Center. The issue of one way versus two way traffic at University City needs to be uncoupled from the grand boulevard envisioned by the Sprague Appleway Reallocation Plan, (SARP). Private funds, not public taxpayer dollars should re- develop the University City area. New Council Regular Meeting 6 -08 -2010 Page 6 of 7 Approved by Council: 1 : • vm destination type businesses can be encouraged by some realistic infrastructure enhancements, possible tax abatements and a welcoming business friendly local government. Although the citizens of this city have indicated time and again that they do not want more tax dollars spent reversing traffic around University City, the prior council approved this change. I was elected to the City Council pledging to the taxpayers that I would not vote to change the traffic around the couplet and U -City back to two way without the consent of the taxpayers. This issue should be put on the General election ballot in November. Settle this issue once and for all. This issue needs to be resolved and the taxpayers should have the final say. The cost of putting this issue on the November 2010 General Election ballot has been estimated by Vickie Dalton's office at about $12,000.00. If the council wants this issue on the ballot we must inform the County elections office of our intent by August 1, 2010. A special election at a later date on this issue would cost in the neighborhood of $100,000.00. Each traffic direction revision as developed by staff should be placed on the ballot with the complete cost to the taxpayer (traffic signal revision, right -a -way purchases, sidewalks, landscaping, etc.) clearly stated on the ballot after each traffic revision. If we are ever to have a common sense direction to move our city forward we need to resolve this issue. I would like to see this issue brought back to the council for a motion as soon as possible to see if this issue can be put on the ballot for a vote in the November General Election." Mayor Towey and Deputy Mayor Schimmels agreed with the idea of putting this issue on the November ballot, to get the cost involved, and let the voters decide. Councilmember Gothmann added that we should also inform our citizens of the arguments for and against the proposition. Councilmember Grafos also mentioned a May 17, 2010 article from the National League of Cities publication "Cities Weekly" addressing finding new uses for abandoned commercial property. Councilmember Grafos further mentioned an article addressing a view of Peter Gordon, UCLA Professor, who has studied the way a number of cities have changed and how they manage change, and that in highly regulated cities, developers are likely that a change or relocation is `not in accordance with our plan' but in lightly regulated cities, proposed changes are more likely to be accommodated, provided they properly manage any adverse effects. Councilmember Grassel said regarding the request by the Towing Company to review our code regarding parking, that we move that as an urgent matter to perhaps the June 29 meeting. Mr. Jackson said the issue will be addressed next week as an administrative report, and then the issue could be forwarded to the Planning Commission. INFORMATION ONLY: Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) was for information only and was not reported on or discussed. It was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels, seconded and unanimously agreed to adjourn. The meeting adjourned at 9:25 p.m. ATTEST: Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Thomas E. Towey, Mayor Council Regular Meeting 6 -08 -2010 Page 7 of 7 Approved by Council: DRAFT MINUTES SPOKANE VALLEY CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING STUDY SESSION FORMAT Spokane Valley City Hall Council Chambers Spokane Valley, Washington Attendance: June 15, 2010 6:00 p.m. Councilmembers Staff Tom Towey, Mayor Mike Jackson, Acting City Manager Gary Schimmels, Deputy Mayor Mike Connelly, City Attorney Bill Gothmann, Councilmember Neil Kersten, Public Works Director Dean Grafos, Councilmember Cary Driskell, Deputy City Attorney Brenda Grassel, Councilmember Kathy McClung, Community Development Dir. Mike Stone, Parks & Recreation Director Rick VanLeuven, Police Chief Scott Kuhta, Senior Planner Absent: Morgan Koudelka, Sr. Administrative Analyst Rose Dempsey, Councilmember Carolbelle Branch, Public Information Officer Bob McCaslin, Councilmember Carrie Koudelka, Deputy City Clerk Mayor Towey called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m ACTION ITEMS: 1. Second Reading Proposed Ordinance, CTA 02 -10 Code Text Amendments — Grey McConnick After Deputy City Clerk Koudelka read the ordinance, it was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels and seconded to approve the ordinance amending the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) Floodplain Regulations, Chapters 17.20, 21.30 and 21.40. Planning Manager McCormick went over three code amendments in this batch: two amendments are proposed as a result of the Washington Cities Insurance Authority 2009 Annual Review and Audit comments, the third amendment relates to flood hazard areas. FEMA is set to enact new maps on July 6, 2010 and this amendment will make the code consistent with the FEMA maps. Mayor Towey invited public comment: No comments offered. Mayor Towey invited Council discussion: No discussion. Vote by Acclamation: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed: None. Abstentions: None. Motion passed. 2. Subarea Items to Send to the Planning Commission: Scott Kuhta It was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels and seconded to direct the Planning Commission to consider text amendments to Book IL Development Regulations, Sprague and Appleway Corridors Subarea Plan to address the following issues :l.) Building Setbacks consider increasing the maximum building setback distance, or eliminating the maximum building setback distance regulation in both Gateway Commercial district zones; 2.) Si„nage Increase the number offreestanding signs (pole signs) allowed per parcel. Consider reverting back to freestanding sign regulations adopted in 2007. Increase the maximum size of wall signs and the limitation on placing wall signs below the 2` story of buildings; 3.) Uses: Consider adding permitted uses to both Gateway Commercial zones that are complementary to uses currently allowed; 4.) Accessory buildings Clarify regulations contained in Book H as they relate to accessory buildings, to ensure that accessory buildings are not impacted by the development regulations contained in Book II; 5.) Buildinz Frontaee Consider removing minimum frontage requirements for buildings in both Gateway Commercial zones. Senior Planner Kuhta gave a brief overview of the items Council previously asked be forwarded to the Planning Commission for review. Mayor Towey invited public comment: Rich Munson 12404 E 27"' Ave — Commented that just like businesses are run according to rules, a City is no different; without rules we have chaos and he doesn't believe we want Sprague Avenue to turn into the Sprague like that west of our borders. Chaos is not what we're looking for and we have reasonable Council Meeting Minutes: 06 -15 -2010 Page I of 6 Approved by Council: DRAFT regulations to allow the private sector to run their own businesses without spoiling the way it looks. He said in looking around the city, he finds it is beautiful; the yards are well kept except for Sprague Avenue where he said the businesses that are open are not good. Mayor Towey invited Council discussion: No discussion; no questions. Vote by Acclamation: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed: None. Abstentions: None. Motion passed. 3. Backhoe Purchase — Neil Kersten It was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels and seconded to approve the purchase of a loader/backhoe as outlined in the Washington State contract # 00 in the amount of $99,3 72.45. Public Works Director Kersten reported that at the January retreat and again in April they discussed the operations program and considered buying a backhoe for stormwater. He said the cost would be split 50150 between street funds and stormwater fiends as it would be used year -round by both departments. He said they estimated the cost at $90,000.00; however, the bid came in at just over $99,000.00. He said the state gave us very good bids and that this is the smallest unit with a front -end loader and a back hoe. Councilmember Grafos asked if the City is also buying a trailer. Mr. Kersten said instead of buying a trailer they would buy an option called "right control" which allows us to run the loader on the road. He said in the future they may want to buy a trailer. Mayor Towey asked if we would have to rent the unit from POE if we don't buy our own. Mr. Kersten stated that would be the case and they would need to have one available to us; that they used one a lot last year and he sees a need for its use in the summer. Councilmember Grafos asked if in purchasing another snow plow (next agenda item) we will have enough. Mr. Kersten said he is still working through that but he thinks they will have enough plows. He said this option is the conservative way to go. Councilmember Grassel asked if the bid is for a new machine and Mr. Kersten confirmed that it is. Mayor Towey invited public comment: Gordon Curry 14313 E Trent — Asked the Council if we really need a new backhoe rather than renting units that are cheaper and pointed out the additional costs for a mechanic, storage, and maintenance. Mayor Towey allowed Mr. Kersten to respond to the question. Mr. Kersten said we have a place to store it and we currently have operators with experience operating this machinery and he thinks we will use it fairly heavily so we will want something very reliable that is not likely to break down. He said the State bid is very competitive, they received five different bids and he thinks this is a good deal and ensures it is a good machine. They also have a sixty -month warranty for any parts replacement. He recommends they buy a new one, especially with this bid. Vote by Acclamation: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed: None. Abstentions: None. Motion passed. 4. Snow Plow Purchase — Neil Kersten It was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels and seconded to approve the purchase of one truck /plow /sander unit per State contract #02709 in the amount of $108,214.80 and #12304 in the amount of $69,275.60. Public Works Director Kersten reported they are using the state contract. He said this was discussed at the January retreat and again on April 6, 2010 and that it falls within the City Manager's authority but they still wanted to bring it before Council. He explained it was a very complicated bid and Washington State Dept. of Transportation (WSDOT) worked with us to help put the bid together. He said he is very comfortable with this bid and they would be buying the truck from a national dealer. Councilmember Grassel inquired as to the life of the units. Mr. Kersten said between eight and ten years, possibly more depending on the level of snow during the year and how heavily they are used. He said this would be one of our primary units. Councilmember Grassel asked if they knew the approximate cost to buy used equipment or to rent. Mr. Kersten said there are not many snow plows available; the ones we have now are surplus from the state and they are eleven years old. He said the salt and brine are extremely corrosive and they tend to have electrical pump problems which need to be replaced at a much higher rate. New trucks are more reliable. He said last winter they lost three trucks in one night and even though they were able to get them repaired within a day, a new vehicle would be much more reliable. He said to get a good fleet, he'd like to add some new trucks to the trucks we have and stagger them in and out over Council Meeting Minutes: 06 -I5 -2010 Page 2 of 6 Approved by Council: DRAFT a period of time. Mayor Towey asked if all the plows have dual usages. Mr. Kersten responded this will be used mainly as a salt/sanding unit and they have a couple that disperse liquid. Mayor Towey invited public comment: No comments offered. Vote by Acclamation: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed: None. Abstentions: None. Motion passed. 5. Comcast Contract Suspension of Fees — Cary Driskell It was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels to authorize the City Manager or designee to negotiate with Comcast to suspend implementation of Section 13.8 of Ordinance 09 -034 and provide for City discretion in future re- implementation ofPEG fees, and to negotiate whether PEG channel provider contracts under Section 13.2 should be mandatory. Motion, failed for lack of a second. 6. Panhandling — CaKy Driskell Deputy City Attorney Driskell reported that panhandling has been determined by the courts as protected free speech and as such will be scrutinized by the courts if challenged. If someone is in line to go to the theater, or if somebody is putting groceries in their trunk and someone asks them for money, a proposed ordinance would have prohibited that action as that is considered a captive audience because the person cannot leave. A draft form of that ordinance moved forward to Council last summer; however, the Stn Circuit Court of Appeals addressed the issue of captive audience as part of their decision in determining that making somebody uncomfortable in that kind of situation is not reason enough for the government to infringe on protected rights and as such staff recommended that Council not make move in that direction. He said the City of Spokane adopted their ordinance in 2008 but they are not actively trying to enforce the captive audience aspect. Instead they are enforcing prohibition of interfering with traffic which is what we've adopted. He said Spokane is more actively going after aggressive panhandling and their numbers are down significantly. Liberty Lake does not have prohibitions on panhandling; however, he said the culture in their city is that their citizens just don't give money to panhandlers. As such, since the panhandlers don't get money there, they go elsewhere. Mr. Driskell said it is likely we get Spokane and Liberty Lake panhandlers because our citizens are more willing to give to them. He said the City of Issaquah has prohibitions on panhandlers within 300' of specified intersections and cautioned Council that those regulations have not been challenged nor had any court analysis done. While it may be effective, the fact that they haven't been challenged causes concern because if we were to adopt and enforce the same regulation and got sued, we would be facing damages under the Civil Rights laws and if we lost the challenge we would also be responsible for all attorney fees. Mr. Driskell further stated that our legal department is not comfortable with what both Tacoma and Issaquah have adopted, as they both could have potential financial risk. He provided Council with a code amendment and map for discussion purposes only. He said it would prohibit panhandling on the intersections included for the Interstate -90 corridors. He said their approach could be enforcing the panhandling at these intersections because it creates a traffic hazard due to the volume of traffic; there is a heightened concern for public safety and therefore there is cause for government to regulate panhandling in that aspect. Councilmember Gothmann asked how this proposal is different from what Spokane Valley is already doing. Mr. Driskell explained the language would be more closely tailored to an offense because in theory someone could step into the right of way and not interfere with traffic. Their proposal would be closely drafted to a specific activity. City Attorney Connelly added that the proposed language takes a general statement and identifies a specific instance that will interfere with the flow of traffic and that it is a safety risk. Councilmember Gothmann asked if it would prohibit solicitation from a sidewalk. Mr. Driskell stated that the draft prohibits stepping into the roadway; therefore, being on the sidewalk would not be prohibited by this because we are more able to link safety issues with stepping into the roadway. Councilmember Gothmann asked if this might prohibit Spokane Cancer Society volunteers from stepping into the roadway to hand out literature for fundraising. Mr. Driskell said it would depend on the facts of the situation, but stepping into the roadway to seek funds would be potentially problematic. He said we have a special permit process tied closely to public safety which requires having insurance, a traffic plan, traffic control training, and is limited to once per year. Councilmember Gothmann asked if it was ok for kids with car wash signs to solicit business as long as they were not stepping into the street. Mr. Driskell said that would not be prohibited. Council Meeting Minutes: 06 -I5 -2010 Page 3 of 6 Approved by Council: DRAFT Mayor Towey said he thinks the ordinance we have now is not doing the job. He said he thinks an ordinance and education of citizens on how to help will work better. He said our current ordinance is at low risk now, and said moving it to a moderate risk level might help. Councilmember Grassel asked if Precinct Commander Lyons could speak to the police perspective as to how they would address this issue. Mr. Lyons said that he believes the ordinance would help and it provides police with a tool they can use. He said he thinks it will be more work for the police, but they can work special details and also inform panhandlers of what will happen if they continue. Acting City Manager Jackson stated that if the ordinance is adopted, it would be the police officers on the street who would have discretion as to how it is used. Councilmember Gothmann asked if principal arterials include medians. Mr. Driskell said they will have to look at how a median is defined, but sidewalks are not medians. They will make sure the definition is appropriate. There was Council consensus to bring a proposed ordinance for consideration at a future meeting. 7. Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) — Morgan Koudelka Senior Administrative Analyst Koudelka explained that in order for the city to be eligible to receive JAG funds it must have five years of crime data reported. He said last year we were disparate with the County and Spokane but this year we are not so we need to apply for the grant ourselves. The grant may be used for state and local initiatives, technical assistance, training, personnel, equipment, supplies, contractual support, and criminal justice information systems for criminal justice that will improve or enhance specific law enforcement areas. He said we are eligible for $44,231.00 and under the advice of Police Chief VanLeuven, staff recommends using the funds to purchase seven rugged notebook computers, referred to as "Go- Books," and ammunition. Precinct Commander Lyons explained the Go -Books are a critical tool and have become so important that they won't allow officers out in the field without one. They are able to look on screen to see where officers are, offering computerized dispatch and allowing supervisors to see where the officers have been assigned. In addition, they allow immediate access to all the policies and procedures, RCW's and the Department of Licensing records. They can also access the Physician's Desk Reference which helps officers to identify prescription drugs in the field, as well as NCIC booking photos which increases efficiency. He explained the reason for the seemingly high cost is because the machines are very rugged. They are designed to withstand temperature extremes and heavy vibrations of the cars. The ammunition to be purchased would be used for firearms training. He said the actual use of fireanns is low but training is critical. Mayor Towey commented that the Go -Books are a great tool and they are used continually to look up different aspects of the job. He said he thinks they are very valuable to the police. Mr. Koudelka said they could come back in two weeks with a proposal to submit the grant application which is due on June 30th. He said all the work would be done prior to Council consideration and saved on the Justice Department database so if Council approves the motion on June 29, 2010, he can submit it the following day to meet the deadline. There were no objections from Council. 8. City Manager Selection Process — Mayor and Council Mayor Towey said Council has received all the applications for City Manager vacancy and they have scheduled an executive session to evaluate the candidates. No action will be taken in the executive session and subsequent sessions may be scheduled. Action to appoint a City Manager and/ or approve a contract will be taken in a regularly scheduled meeting. There were no further comments or questions. 9. 2011 Budget — Mike Jackson and Ken Thompson Acting City Manager Jackson explained that tonight he and Finance Director Thompson are providing general background information on the 2011 budget in preparation for the Budget Retreat in July. He asked that if Council thinks staff has missed anything they let staff know so it can be discussed. He said they hope to answer the frequent question of citizens as to where their property taxes go, how we propose to weather the current economic storm, as well as provide a comparison of Spokane Valley with other Washington cities. Council Meeting Minutes: 06 -15 -2010 Page 4 of 6 Approved by Council: DRAFT Mr. Thompson explained that we pay for most of our operations from the general fund and within that we have two main sources of revenue, sales tax and property tax. He said our sales taxes are down but property taxes are up a little bit. Councilmember Gothmann asked if the general fund includes a substantial carryover. Mr. Thompson confirmed that these are 2010 figures and they reflect what we anticipate will carry over into 2011. Mayor Towey asked how the tax rate is calculated. Mr. Thompson said it is calculated by the state based on what we submit for our tax levy. He said the county has five places they check to make sure we are within the rules and divide by the assessed value to get the tax rate; it is a fairly complicated process and it is difficult to predict where we might be. Acting City Manager Jackson said that sales tax revenue is down significantly, $3.5 million from the high we saw in 2007. He said they will discuss ideas to remove our future deficit, maintain basic service levels with reduced resources, minimize personnel overhead by contracting, leverage city funds with grants, and minimize our debt. Mr. Thompson said the Finance Committee suggested looking at a 3 %, 6 %, and 9% reduction, after already reducing the budget by 3 %. Mr. Jackson said we don't want a deficit in 2014. We want to maintain the general fund ending balance at 15% through 2014 and maintain the service level stabilization fund of $5.4 million through 2014 rather than spending it down. He said they think if we meet our objectives at a minimum we will be in a good financial situation. He said a 15% ending balance is considered a healthy carryover and $5.4 million helps put us in good financial shape. He said we base the budget and our six -year business plan on the current financial conditions. He asked all departments to consider their budget at 97% and said that we look good to achieve that goal, which saves the city about $1 million. He said they also looked at cutting future expenditures by at least 3% and it looks like we can achieve our objectives to maintain the stabilization fund if we snake reductions for 2011 at 34%. Councilmember Grafos said he thinks we are headed in the right direction and he is pleased we are getting ahead of the curve; that we need to be proactive. Councilmember Gothmann said there has been discussion in the public as to how we got the debt. Mr. Thompson explained that in 2002 the public approved an extra 1 /10 of 1% tax for the Convention and Visitor's Bureau, the fairgrounds, and CenterPlace. When we incorporated, the County transferred to us a $7 million debt for CenterPlace and a $2 million debt for road projects, so we started with a $9 million debt which we have paid down a bit. Councilmember Grassel said at the retreat she would like to look at department priorities by individual department. Mr. Jackson agreed and said we should also look at capital projects and street preservation projects. He said the economy needs to improve to help with our tax base, but the City will need additional revenue sources to fully fund the Street Master Plan. Councilmember Grassel asked if there are grant funds for that project. Mr. Jackson said there may be a rare grant but they are really looking at funding street preservation through City revenues. Most of the grants come for arterial streets, not usually for community roads. Councilmember Grassel asked that the budget reflect the actual "needs" of Spokane Valley first and "wants" second. Mr. Jackson said he can provide that information at the budget retreat. Mayor Towey called, for a recess at 7:35 p. m. The meeting reconvened at 7:45 p. m. 10. Subarea Plan (SARP) Zone: Mixed Use — Scott Kuhta Senior Planner Kuhta went through the presentation on the Mixed Use Avenue District Zone within the Sprague and Appleway Subarea Plan. Councilmember Grassel inquired as to what types of residential units they are referring to as permitted on the ground floor. Mr. Kuhta said apartments would be permitted, garden apartments, condos, etc., so long as they are not more than one - story. Councilmember Grafos stated there are pre - located streets that are part of this zone, and there are approximately 46 buildings that pre- located streets go through so that changes the orientation of the buildings. He said we should talk to property owners about the effect the pre - located streets have on their properties. Councilmember Grassel asked if staff will come back with notes for Council from the June 24 community meeting discussing the Mixed Use Avenue Zone. Mr. Kuhta confirmed that is their plan. Community Director McClung said they mailed their meeting notices according to information from the Accessor and our own database and we received several of the notices back. She said staff tried calling businesses to get better information, but for some reason they are getting a lot back and it seems as though many that came back were from owners out of state. She stated the community meeting is June 24 in City Council Chambers from 8:00 to 10:00 a.m. Councilmember Grafos asked for clarification as to what is meant on Council Meeting Minutes: 06 -I5 -2010 Page 5 of 6 Approved by Council: DRAFT page 6 where they are referring to "80 %" under non- confonning use clarifications. Mr. Kuhta said the 80% in this circumstance refers to if the "use" is destroyed at 80% of the value of the structure; not if the "structure" is destroyed by 80 %. He said they need to clarify that language and separate "use" from "structure" value. City Attorney Connelly said the City can entertain legislative changes to our code but we would want to do that on a case -by -case basis if, that is what Council desires. 11. Information Only The Pavement Requirements, Swimming Scholarship, and Comcast Sixty Day Extension were for information only and were not reported on or discussed. 12. Advance Agenda — Mayor Towey Acting City Manager Jackson said the deadline to submit the ballot issue to the County is August 10; it is scheduled as in information item for June 29 but that could possibly be an administrative report. 13. Council Check in — Mayor Towey Councilmembers Gothmann, Grafos, Deputy Mayor Schimmels and Mayor Towey had no comment. Councilmember Grassel said she attended the American Cancer Society Relay for Life and interviewed with Steve Mumm on the Discovery Playground. 14. City Manager Comments — Mike Jackson Pointed out info only items — and thanked staff for rapid turn- around to respond. 15. Executive Session: To evaluate the qualifications of an applicant for public employment [RCW 42.30.1 10(1)(g)1 It was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels, seconded, and unanimously agreed to adjourn into executive session for approximately 120 minutes to evaluate the qualifications of applicants for public employment pursuant to RCW 42.30. 110 (1) (g), and further that they approve the attendance of councilmember Rose Dempsey by telephone. No action is anticipated when they return from executive session. Council adjourned into executive session at 8:13 p.m. At approximately 9:30 p.m., Mayor Towey declared Council out of executive session, and it was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels, seconded and unanimously agreed to adjourn. The meeting adjourned at 9:32 p.m. ATTEST: Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Thomas E. Towey, Mayor Council Meeting Minutes: 06 -15 -2010 Page 6of6 Approved by Council: CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: June 29, 2010 City Manager Sign -off: Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ® new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Second reading of proposed ordinance for right -of -way vacation to vacate approximately 210 feet in length by 30 feet in width of 16 Avenue located between parcels 35262.9091 and 35262.0803 to the south and parcels 35233.2711, 35233.2712, 35233.2719 and 35233.2822 to the north. GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 35.79 et seq., RCW 58.17.212 and Section 22.140 of the Uniform Development Code. BACKGROUND: This street vacation came before City Council on April 13, 2010 under Resolution 10 -008 setting a public hearing date for May 13, 2010 with the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission conducted the public hearing as scheduled on May 13, 2010 and voted 6 -0 to recommend conditional approval of STV- 0 1 -10. The applicant Alan Gay, USKH, on behalf of abutting property owner with two - thirds ownership, Tyler Ferguson, Coastal Community Bank, requests the vacation of a portion of 16 Avenue. The right of way is unimproved and the abutting parcels are accessed via an improved private road, 16 Lane. The vacated area is located approximately 362 feet west of the intersection of Carnahan Road and Kahuna Drive and further located between parcels 35262.9091 and 35262.0803 to the south and parcels 35233.2711, 35233.2712, 35233.2719 and 35233.2822 to the north. 16 Avenue was originally dedicated in 1907 as part of the Woodland Terrace Plat. The street was named Fourteenth Avenue and changed to 16 Avenue at a later time. Located east of the proposed vacation, approximately 362 feet of 16 Avenue was vacated in 1996 by Spokane County at the intersection of Carnahan Road and Kahuna Drive. 2nd Reading of Ordinance for STV -01 -10 Page 1 of The Planning Commission made the following findings as part of their recommendation to City Council: 1. The vacation of the street will better serve the public because it will allow for the full development of the properties (parcels 35233.2711, 35233.2712, 35233.2719 and 35233.2822) abutting to the north. 2. The street is no longer required for public use or public access. The street cannot access Carnahan Road or Kahuna Drive to the east and the natural environment (Glenrose creek) prohibits connection to the west. 3. The creation of 16 Lane (private drive) provides a new and more useful path of travel for lots to access onto Kahuna Drive and Carnahan Road. 4. Given the present age and condition of adjacent development, it is unlikely that conditions will change in the future to provide a greater use or need than presently exists. It is recommended that 16 Avenue right -of -way be aggregated with the northerly parcels. 5. The vacated property is wholly within the above described parcels and title shall vest in those parcels on the northern boundary of the vacated roadway. 6. No objections have been received to the proposed vacation from the notice of public hearing and /or routing to staff and agencies. Pursuant to Resolution 07 -009, Section I(Policy); states "The cost for property received as a result of a vacation initiated by an adjacent property owner shall equal 50% of the appraised value of the vacated property received ". Section I.I.a allows the property values to be averaged if value of adjacent properties differs. Based on the average assessed value of the adjacent properties, $ 6,797.50 is 50% of the assessed value. The calculation of assessed value for the vacated street is detailed below. The ordinance specifies the payment amount in Section 5, Condition No. 12. Parcel Number Appraised Market Value Lot Size in Square Feet (ft) Appraised Value per Square Foot (ft) 35233.2711 $4,500.00 6.475 ft $0.69 35233.2712 $4,500.00 6.475 ft $0.69 35233.2719 $45,000.00 10,147 ft $4.43 35233.2822 $45,000.00 8,359 ft $5.38 35262.0803 $57,500.00 30,056 ft $1.19 35262.9091 $110,940.00 185,130 ft2 $0.60 1. Average appraised value per ft $12.98/6 = $2.16 2. Actual square footage of vacation is 6,294 ft 209.79' x 30' = 6,294 ft 3. Appraised value for the area of street vacation. 6,294 ft2 x $2.16 = $13,595 4. 50% of appraised value $13,595 x 50% = $6,797.50 5. Subtracting amount paid for application p rocessing $6,797.50 - $ 1,365.00 = $5,432.50 Total charges of vacated street = $5,432.50 OPTIONS: 1. Approve street vacation (STV- 01 -10) ordinance; 2. Deny the proposed street vacation; or 3. Schedule a public hearing that will be conducted 20 days after noticing in the mail, on -site and posted three conspicuous places in the City. 2nd Reading of Ordinance for STV -0 1 -10 Page 2 of 3 RECOMMENDED MOTION: "Move to adopt Ordinance." STAFF CONTACT: Karen Kendall, Assistant Planner ATTACHMENTS: 1. Draft Ordinance 2nd Reading of Ordinance for STV -0 1 -10 Page 3 of 3 DRAFT CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 10 -000 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY WASHINGTON, PROVIDING FOR A RIGHT -OF -WAY VACATION TO VACATE APPROXIMATELY 210 FEET IN LENGTH BY 30 FEET IN WIDTH OF 16 AVENUE LOCATED BETWEEN PARCELS 35262.9091 AND 35262.0803 TO THE SOUTH AND PARCELS 35233.2711, 35233.2712, 35233.2719 AND 35233.2822 TO THE NORTH, AND PROVIDING FOR OTHER MATTERS PROPERLY RELATING THERETO. WHEREAS, a completed application for vacation was filed on March 12, 2010, and WHEREAS, the City Council by Resolution 10 -008 set a public hearing date for May 13, 2010 with the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on May 13, 2010; and WHEREAS, following a hearing, the Planning Commission found that the notice and hearing requirements of the applicable Spokane Valley Municipal Code section 22.140.020 have been met; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission findings and /or minutes have been filed with the City Clerk as part of the public record supporting the vacation; and WHEREAS, none of the property owners abutting the property to be vacated filed a written objection to the proposed vacation with the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, through adopted City Code provisions, the City shall provide that the vacated property be transferred to parcels 35233.2711, 35233.2712, 35233.2719 and 35233.2822; that the zoning district designation of the properties adjoining the street shall attach to the vacated property; that a record of survey shall be submitted to the Director of Community Development; and that all direct and indirect costs of title transfer to the vacated street be paid by the proponent or recipient of the transferred property; and WHEREAS, the vacated roadway is wholly contained within the parcels dedicated above and created pursuant to Woodland Terrace Plat. WHEREAS, the City Council desires to vacate the above street pursuant to Spokane Valley Municipal Code Section 22.140. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley, Spokane County, Washington, do ordain as follows: Section 1. Findings of Fact The City Council makes the following findings of fact: 1. The vacation of the street will better serve the public because it will allow for the full development of the properties (parcels 35233.2711, 35233.2712, 35233.2719 and 35233.2822) abutting to the north. 2. The street is no longer required for public use or public access. The street cannot access Carnahan Road or Kahuna Drive to the east and the natural environment (Glenrose Creek) prohibits connection to the west. Ordinance 10 -000 - Street Vacation STV -01 -10 Page 1 of 5 DRAFT 3. The substitution of a new and different public way would be more useful to the public. The creation of 16 Lane (private drive) provides a new and more useful path of travel for lots to access onto Kahuna Drive and Carnahan Road. 4. Given the present age and condition of adjacent development, it is unlikely that conditions will change in the future to provide a greater use or need than presently exists. It is recommended that 16 Avenue right -of -way be aggregated with the northerly parcels. 5. The vacated property is wholly within the above described parcels and title shall vest in those parcels on the northern boundary of the vacated roadway. 6. No objections have been received to the proposed vacation from the notice of public hearing and /or routing to staff and agencies. 7. Pursuant to Resolution 07 -009, Section 1: Policy a. The cost for property received as a result of a vacation initiated by an adjacent property owner shall equal 50% of the appraised value of the vacated property received. The appraised value shall be the same as the value of an equivalent portion of property adjacent to the proposed vacation as established by Spokane County Assessor at the time the matter is considered by the City Council. ii. If the value of adjacent properties differs, than the average of the adjacent property values per square foot will be used. Based on the average assessed value of the adjacent properties, $6,797.50 is 50% of the assessed value. Section 2 . Property to be Vacated Based upon the above findings and in accordance with this Ordinance, the City Council does hereby vacate the street or alley which is incorporated herein by reference, and defined as follows: That portion of 16 Avenue per the plat of Woodland Terrace as recorded in Book I" of plats, page 16, lying westerly of the westerly boundary of Block 28, and lying easterly of the southerly extension of the westerly boundary line of Lot 10 of Block 27 of said plat. Section 3. Division of Property to be Vacated. Pursuant to RCW 35.79.040 and SVMC 22.140.040(C), factual circumstances dictate a different division and distribution of the street to be vacated to parcels 35233.2711, 35233.2712, 35233.2719 and 35233.2822, thus the property to be vacated shall be divided as recorded in the record of survey which shall be created and recorded with the County as required under Section 22.140.090 SVMC. Section 4 . Zoning The Zoning designation for the vacated property shall be the designation attached to the adjoining properties as set forth within the respective property or lot lines. The Director of Community Development is authorized to make this notation on the official Zoning Map of the City. Section 5 . Conditions of Vacation The following conditions shall be fully satisfied prior to the transfer of title by the City. 1. The completion of the street vacation (File# STV- 01 -10) including all conditions below shall be submitted to the City for review within ninety (90) days following the effective date of approval by the City Council. 2. The vacated property shall be transferred to parcels 35233.2711, 35233.2712, 35233.2719 and 35233.2822 abutting the vacation on the north. Ordinance 10 -000 - Street Vacation STV -01 -10 Page 2 of 5 DRAFT 3. The existing easement for the private road and utilities will need to be updated to include the portions of the private road and utilities that are currently in the right -of -way which is proposed to be vacated. A draft easement will need to be submitted to the City of Spokane Valley Development Engineering Division and Avista Utilities to be reviewed and accepted. 4. Prior to finalization of the street vacation, a voluntary compliance agreement must be signed providing that within one year of the approval of the vacation: a. The revised private road and utility easement will be recorded. b. A Homeowner's Association (HOA) will be formed to assume the responsibility for the operation and maintenance of the facilities that are within the 16 Lane project, as depicted in the approved SF -03 -05 Civil plans, including the onsite stormdrain system, 16 Lane itself, the stormwater channel along the south edge of 16 Lane and other related onsite facilities. c. An Operations and Maintenance Manual with a financial plan for the facilities, and, CC &R's for the HOA will be prepared for review and approval by the Development Engineering Division. d. The stormwater generated by the 16 Lane project will be covered by one of the following: i. The stormwater would be kept onsite rather than flowing into the existing stormdrain that is north of this project. This would involve a redesign of the current accepted Civil plans and construction of the new stormwater facilities. A financial surety will be required to cover the revised improvements not constructed and accepted within the one year. ii. The stormwater would flow into the existing stormdrain system that is north of this project and the HOA will assume a proportional share of the responsibility for the operation and maintenance of the regional stormdrain system (which extends from 16 Lane to the retention pond) and the retention pond that the stormwater from 16 Lane drains into. Following the City Council's passage of the ordinance approving the proposal to vacate the street, a record of survey of the area to be vacated, prepared by a registered surveyor in the State of Washington and including an exact metes and bounds legal description, and specifying if applicable any and all easements for construction, repair and maintenance of existing and future utilities and services, shall be submitted by the proponent to the Director of Community Development, or designee for review. 6. Following the City Council's passage of the ordinance approving the proposal to vacate the street, a Boundary Line Elimination must be done to aggregate (consolidate) the northerly parcels with vacated street. These items can be included on the above mentioned record of survey. 7. The surveyor shall locate at least two monuments on the centerline of the vacated right -of- way with one located at the intersection of the centerline of the vacated right -of -way with each street or right -of -way in accordance with the standards established by the Spokane County Standards for Road and Sewer Construction. 8. All direct and indirect costs of title transfer of the vacated street from public to private ownership including but not limited to title company charges, copying fees, and recording fees are to be borne by the proponent. The City will not assume any financial responsibility for any direct or indirect costs for the transfer of title. 9. The zoning district designation of the properties adjoining each side of the street or alley to be vacated shall be automatically extended to the center of such vacation, and all area Ordinance 10 -000 - Street Vacation STV -01 -10 Page 3 of 5 DRAFT included in the vacation shall then and henceforth be subject to all regulations of the extended districts. The adopting ordinance shall specify this zoning district extension inclusive of the applicable zoning district designations. 10. The record of survey and certified copy of the ordinance vacating a street or alley or part thereof shall be recorded by the city clerk in the office of the Spokane County Auditor. 11. All conditions of City Council authorization shall be fully satisfied prior to any transfer of title by the City. 12. Payment in the amount of $5,432.50 ($6,797.50 less $1,365.00 previously paid) shall be paid to the City of Spokane Valley by the adjacent property owner(s) receiving the property. Section 6 . Closing Following satisfaction of the above conditions, the City Clerk shall record a certified copy of this Ordinance in the office of the County Auditor, and the City Manager is authorized to execute all necessary documents in order to complete the transfer of the property identified herein. Section 7 . Severability If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance shall be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance. Section 8 . Effective Date This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect five (5) days after publication of this Ordinance or a summary thereof in the official newspaper of the City of Spokane Valley as provided by law. PASSED by the City Council this day of June, 2010. ATTEST: Thomas E. Towey, Mayor Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Approved As To Form: Office of the City Attorney Ordinance 10 -000 - Street Vacation STV -01 -10 Page 4 of 5 DRAFT Exhibit "A" Property Description c ny of �aoxana uauep AREA TO BE VACATED (PORTION OF 16 AVE) Ordinance 10 -000 - Street Vacation STV -01 -10 Page 5 of 5 rI FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE SPOKANE VALLEY PLANNING COMMISSION May 13, 2010 The following findings have been prepared by Staff for the Planning Commission to request approval. Background: 1. An application for vacation was filed on March 12, 2010. 2. A completed application for vacation was processed on March 23, 2010. 3. City Council adopted Resolution No. 10 -008 on April 13, 2010, setting the date for a public hearing. 4. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on May 13, 2010. 5. Following a hearing, the Planning Commission found that the notice and hearing requirements of the applicable Spokane Valley Municipal Code section 22.140.020 have been met. 6. None of the property owners abutting the property to be vacated filed a written objection to the proposed vacation with the City Clerk; and Findings: 1. The vacation of the street will better serve the public because it will allow for the full development of the properties (parcels 35233.2711, 35233.2712, 35233.2719 and 35233.2822) abutting to the north. 2. The street is no longer required for public use or public access. The street cannot access Carnahan Road or Kahuna Drive to the east and the natural environment (Glenrose creek) prohibits connection to the west. 3. The substitution of a new and different public way would be more useful to the public. The creation of 16 Lane (private drive) provides a new and more useful path of travel for lots to access onto Kahuna Drive and Carnahan Road. 4. Given the present age and condition of adjacent development, it is unlikely that conditions will change in the future to provide a greater use or need than presently exists. It is recommended that 16 Avenue right -of -way be aggregated with the northerly parcels. 5. No objections have been received to the proposed vacation from the notice of public hearing and /or routing to staff and agencies. 6. Abutting Property No. 1: Tyler Ferguson, Coastal Community Bank, owns property that abuts the right -of -way on the north and includes Parcels 35233.2711, 35233.2712, 35233.2719 and 35233.2822. Abutting Property No. 2: Jenn -Hwan & Shaio Yu Lee Wang owns property (parcel 35262.0803) that abuts the right -of -way on the south. Abutting Property No. 3: J.G. Ward, owns property (parcel 35262.9091) that abuts the right -of -way on the south. 7. Utilities: a. Sewer: No sewer services are located in 16 Avenue. b. Water: City of Spokane Water Department commented on February 12, 2010 stating no infrastructure was located within area of proposed vacation and no objections to proeosal. Staff notes the City of Spokane Valley approved civil plans for the private road (16 Lane) indicates a water line was installed. c. Telephone /Fiber Optics: Qwest submitted a letter dated February 3, 2010 with no objections. d. Gas and Electricity: Avista Utilities submitted a letter dated March 10, 2010 with no objections. e. Cable Television: Comcast submitted a letter dated February 3, 2010 with no objections. All of the utility providers have been contacted by the applicant and their correspondence is attached. The specific location of easements is a requirement of the record of survey 8. Stormwater drainage facilities: There are two (2) drainage facilities located in the portion of 16 Avenue being vacated. Along the south half of the vacation a stormwater channel captures runoff from Kahuna Drive and conveys the stormwater runoff to Glenrose Creek to the west. The second system is a storm pipe which collects all runoff from 16 Lane (private drive) and is treated further north into another stormwater system. Currently there is no responsibility for the operations and maintenance of the stormdrain system, 16 Lane and the stormwater channel along the south of 16 Lane. 9. Spokane Valley Fire District No. 1: The existing hammerhead and private road located within right -of -way and fire hydrants must be maintained per letter dated January 28, 2010. 10. Spokane Valley Community Development - Building Division: No concerns with proposed vacation. 11. Zoning/Comprehensive Plan: Single - Family Residential District (R -3) zoning and Low Density Residential Comprehensive Plan designation. 12. Land Use: Currently the right -of -way is not serving any properties. There is no public right -of -way connecting to the area of 16 Avenue being vacated. 16 Lane (private road) is an easement designated to serve only those lots it is built upon. 13. Spokane Valley Public Works Department: No concerns with proposed vacation. 14. Condition of street: South half of an improved private road (16 Lane) is within area of vacation. The west approximately seventy (70) feet is unimproved and a portion is located through Glenrose Creek. 15. Assignment of vacated portions of right -of -way: Pursuant to Section 22.140.040.0 of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) one -half of a vacated street shall go to each abutting property owner, unless otherwise dictated. The applicant is requesting the entire portion of vacation be incorporated to the abutting properties to the north (parcels 35233.2711, 35233.2712, 35233.2719 and 35233.2822). Conclusions: The criteria set forth in Section 22.140.030 of the SVMC has been met based upon the findings set forth. Recommendations: The Spokane Valley Planning Commission therefore recommends approval to the City Council of the vacation of 210 feet in length by 30 feet of width of dedicated right -of -way for 16 Avenue. This approval is subject to the following: 1. The completion of the street vacation (File# S T V- 01 -10) including all conditions below shall be submitted to the City for review within ninety (90) days following the effective date of approval by the City Council. 2. The vacated property shall be transferred to parcels 35233.2711, 35233.2712, 3 523 3.2719 and 3 523 3.2822 abutting the vacation on the north. 3. The existing easement for the private road and utilities will need to be updated to include the portions of the private road and utilities that are currently in the right -of -way which is proposed to be vacated. A draft easement will need to be submitted to the City of Spokane Valley Development Engineering Division and Avista Utilities to be reviewed and accepted. Prior to finalization of the street vacation, a voluntary compliance agreement must be signed providing that within one year of the approval of the vacation: a. The revised private road and utility easement will be recorded. b. A Homeowner's Association (HOA) will be formed to assume the responsibility for the operation and maintenance of the facilities that are within the 16 Lane project, as depicted in the approved SF -03 -05 Civil plans, including the onsite stormdrain system, 16 Lane itself, the stormwater channel along the south edge of 16 Lane and other related onsite facilities. c. An Operations and Maintenance Manual with a financial plan for the facilities, and, CC &R's for the HOA will be prepared and accepted, d. The stormwater generated by the 16 Lane project will be covered by one of the following: i. The stormwater would be kept onsite rather than flowing into the existing stormdrain that is north of this project. This would involve a redesign of the current accepted Civil plans and construction of the new stormwater facilities. A financial surety will be required to cover the revised improvements not constructed and accepted within the one year. ii. The stormwater would flow into the existing stormdrain system that is north of this project and the HOA will assume a proportional share of the responsibility for the operation and maintenance of the regional stormdrain system (which extends from 16 Lane to the retention pond) and the retention pond that the stormwater from 16 Lane drains into. 5. Following the City Council's passage of the ordinance approving the proposal to vacate the street, a record of survey of the area to be vacated, prepared by a registered surveyor in the State of Washington and including an exact metes and bounds legal description, and specifying if applicable any and all easements for construction, repair and maintenance of existing and future utilities and services, shall be submitted by the proponent to the Director of Community Development, or designee for review. 6. Following the City Council's passage of the ordinance approving the proposal to vacate the street, a Boundary Line Elimination must be done to aggregate (consolidate) the northerly parcels with vacated street. These items can be included on the above mentioned record of survey. 7. The surveyor shall locate at least two monuments on the centerline of the vacated right -of -way with one located at the intersection of the centerline of the vacated right -of -way with each street or right- of -way in accordance with the standards established by the Spokane County Standards for Road and Sewer Construction. 8. All direct and indirect costs of title transfer of the vacated street from public to private ownership including but not limited to title company charges, copying fees, and recording fees are to be borne by the proponent. The City will not assume any financial responsibility for any direct or indirect costs for the transfer of title. 9. The zoning district designation of the properties adjoining each side of the street or alley to be vacated shall be automatically extended to the center of such vacation, and all area included in the vacation shall then and henceforth be subject to all regulations of the extended districts. The adopting ordinance shall specify this zoning district extension inclusive of the applicable zoning district designations. 10. The record of survey and certified copy of the ordinance vacating a street or alley or part thereof shall be recorded by the city clerk in the office of the Spokane County Auditor. 11. All conditions of City Council authorization shall be fully satisfied prior to any transfer of title by the City. Approved this 13th day of May, 201 Carroll, ATTEST Deariha Griffith, Administr t Assistant "TYHA "«5PQ'A'4" Department of Community Development Planning Division STV-01-10 Department of Community Development Planning Division Planning Commission Recommended Conditions ® Completion of conditions within 90 days of ordinance becoming effective; and O Vacated portion will be transferred to the 4 parcels north of vacated area and zoning designation extended; and O Update easements to include portion of vacated street; and O VCA allowing 1 year for completion of requirements pertaining to 16th Lane (private road); and O Boundary Line Adjustment, Record of Survey, Recording of Documents; and O All direct and indirect costs relating to street vacation. ` 'pokanc Department of Community Development lvhlle Planning Division Conditions City Council has the authority to impose a condition requiring compensation pursuant to Resolution 07 -009; Parcel Number Appraised Market Lot Size in Square Feet (ft Value 35233.2711 35233.2712 35233.2719 35233.2822 35262.0803 35262.9091 $4,500.00 $4,500.00 $45,000.00 $45,000.00 $57,500.00 $110,940.00 6.475 ft 6.475 ft 10,147 ft 8,359 ft 30,056 ft 185,130 ft Average appraised value per ft Actual square footage of vacation is 6,294 ft Appraised value for the area of street vacation. 50% of appraised value Subtracting amount paid for application processing Appraised Value per Square Foot (ft 2 ) $0.69 $0.69 $4.43 $5.38 $1.19 $0.60 $12.98/6 = $2.16 209.79'x 30' = 6,294 ft 6,294 ft X$2.16 = $13,595 $13,595 x 50% = $6,797.50 otal charges of vacated street = $5,432.50 Department of Community Development Planning Division rrrf = �= ne' a WV Area of right-of- way vacation ��` 9 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: June 29, 2010 City Manager Sign -off: Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ® new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Proposed Resolution Adopting the 2011 -2016 Six Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 35.77.010, Perpetual advanced six -year plans for coordinated transportation program expenditures. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Adopted 2010 -2015 Six Year TIP last year on June 16, 2009, Resolution #09 -009; Presentation of Draft 2011 -2016 Six Year TIP at Council's May 4, 2010 Study Session; Public Hearing on draft 2011 -2016 Six Year TIP on May 25, 2010. BACKGROUND: The City is required by RCW 35.77.010 to prepare and after public hearing adopt a revised and extended comprehensive transportation program for the ensuing six calendar years. This plan must be submitted to the Washington State Secretary of Transportation before July 1s' of each year. A Public Hearing was held to accept public comment on the Draft 2011 — 2016 Six Year TIP on May 25, 2010. No comments were received. A copy of the draft plan was also submitted to the Washington Department of Community, Trade and Economic Development (CTED) 60 days prior to the scheduled adoption in accordance with RCW 36.70A.106. A Non - Project SEPA Checklist was also prepared and submitted for public comment. Changes have been made to the draft 2011 -2016 Six year TIP based on project information received since the public hearing. These changes include the following: 1. Park Road - #2 (PE Only) — Broadway to Indiana: Project added to account for currently funded design work carrying over to 2011. 2. Indiana Ave Extension — 3600' e/o Sullivan Rd to Mission & Flora: Project added to account for currently funded construction work carrying over to 2011. 3. Broadway @ Argonne /Mullan Intersections PCC (PE /RW only): Project added based on receiving approval from SRTC Board for STP(U) funding. 4. Mission Ave — Flora Rd to Barker Rd (PE /RW only): Project added based on receiving approval from SRTC Board for STP(U) funding. 5. Sullivan /Euclid PCC Intersection (PE /RW only): Project added based on receiving approval from SRTC Board for STP(U) funding. 6. Sullivan Road West Bridge: Updated total project cost based on most recent engineering estimate. Revised funding sources to include FMSIB based on grant application submitted in June. 7. Broadway @ Argonne /Mullan Intersections PCC (CN only): Added as a separate project based on receiving funding for PE phase. 8. Sullivan /Euclid PCC Intersection (CN only): Added as a separate project based on receiving funding for PE phase. 9. Mission Ave — Flora Rd to Barker Rd (CN only): Added as a separate project based on receiving funding for PE /RW phase. OPTIONS: 1) Adopt the proposed 2011 -2016 Six Year TIP as presented, 2) Adopt proposed 2011 -2016 Six Year TIP with revisions, or 3) provide additional direction to staff. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to approve the resolution adopting the 2011- 2016 Six Year Transportation Improvement Program as presented. BUDGET /FINANCIAL IMPACTS: The proposed 2011 -2016 TIP projects will be budgeted within the Street Capital Projects Fund. At the current level of projected revenues not all projects listed in the draft 2011 -2016 TIP can be funded at this time. Staff will continue to evaluate available resources for all projects relative to future transportation grant opportunities. STAFF CONTACT: Neil Kersten, Public Works Director; Steve Worley, Senior Engineer — Capital Projects ATTACHMENTS: 1) Resolution for Adopting the 2011 -2016 Six Year TIP, 2) Draft 2011 - 2016 Six Year TIP. DRAFT CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. 10- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING THE 2010 -2016 SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY. WHEREAS, to provide for the proper and necessary development of the street system within the City of Spokane Valley, the City shall, as required by State law, develop and adopt annually a Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program ( "TIP ") with such program acting as a guide for the coordinated development of the City's transportation system; and WHEREAS, the TIP of the City shall specifically set forth those projects and programs of both City and regional significance that benefit the transportation system and promote public safety and efficient vehicle movements; and WHEREAS, the Six Year TIP shall be consistent with the City Comprehensive Plan and be adopted following one or more public hearings before the City Council; and WHEREAS, a draft copy of the Six Year TIP was submitted to the Washington State Department of Commerce sixty days prior to the scheduled adoption in accordance with RCW 36.70A.106; and WHEREAS, the City Council conducted a public hearing on May 25, 2010, for the purpose of inviting and receiving public comment on the proposed Six Year TIP. NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley, Spokane County, Washington, as follows: The City Council hereby adopts the attached Six Year TIP for the City of Spokane Valley for the purpose of guiding the design, development and construction of local and regional transportation improvements for the years 2011 through 2016. The City Clerk is directed to file the 2011 -2016 Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program with the Washington State Secretary of Transportation not later than June 30. The TIP shall be reviewed at least annually for the purpose of determining the work to be accomplished under the program and the City transportation requirements. Adopted this 29 day of June, 2010. City of Spokane Valley Thomas E. Towev, Mayor ATTEST: Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Approved as to Form: Office of the City Attorney Resolution Adopting 2011 -2016 TIP Page 1 of 1 _41L _ Department of Public Works City of Spokane Valley DRAFT 2011 - 2016 Six Year 0 . R �� l� . ■ Ing r tr iw.. Transportation Improvement Program City of Spokane Valley Department of Public Works 2011 — 2016 Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program Spokane ,,;,o0Va11ey Glossary & Abbreviations Funding Sources: Principal Arterial • ARRA American Recovery & Reinvestment Act • BR Bridge Replacement Program • City City Funds • CDBG Community Development Block Grant • CMAQ Congestion Management/Air Quality • Developers Private Developer Funds • EECBG Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant • FHWA Federal Highway Administration • FMSIB Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Program • HUD Housing & Urban Development • REET Real Estate Excise Tax • Other Fed Misc. Federal Funding Sources • Other RR Railroad Funding • Other State Misc. State Funding Sources • SP TIB Sidewalk Program • SRTS Safe Routes to School • SW City Stormwater Funds • STA Spokane Transit Authority • STP(E) Surface Transportation Program (Enhancement) • STP(U) Surface Transportation Program (Urban) • TIB Transportation Improvement Board • UAP TIB Urban Arterial Program • UCP TIB Urban Corridor Program • WSDOT Washington Department of Transportation • WTSC Washington Traffic Safety Commission • WUTC Washington Utilities & Transportation Commission Fundina Status: • S Project Funding is Secured • P Project Funding is Planned. The Most Probable Funding Sources have been Identified. Project Phases: • PE Preliminary Engineering • RW Right -of -Way • CN Construction • VE Value Engineering Construction Tvae: • PCC Portland Cement Concrete • HMA Hot Mix Asphalt • ITS Intelligent Transportation System (Integrated Traffic Signal Control Systems) • STEP Septic Tank Elimination Program Street Functional Classifications: • Urban: • 14 Principal Arterial • 16 Minor Arterial • 17 Collector Arterial • 19 Local Access { „ Draft 2011 - 2016 S#6kao 1e Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program Valley Dollars in Thousands Funding Project / Description / Current Status Length PE RW CN Total Sources 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total 1 Park Road - # 2 (PE Only)- Broadway to Indiana, 0.75 35 0 0 35 City 5 5 S STP(U) 30 30 Proj. #2 - Reconstruct and widen to 3 lanes with bike lanes and sidewalks. Funding Secured (SRTC 06 -11), City Project #0069 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, ani are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions. 6/18/2010 Page 1 Project Total 35 35 2 Indiana Ave Extension - 3600' e/o Sullivan Rd to 0.4 0 0 375 375 UCP 282 282 S Mission & Flora City 53 53 Develop 40 40 ers Extend Indiana Ave with a three lane section to a Roundabout at Mission /Flora Funding Secured TIB 9 -E- 208(002) -1, City Project #0112 Project Total 375 375 3 Argonne Road - 190 to Trent, 0.38 0 0 713 713 City 101 101 S CMAQ 612 612 Revise Signal Phasing, Add NB Right Turn Lane at Montgomery, Intersections Improvements at Knox Funding Secured (SRTC 06 -31), City Project #0060 Project Total 713 713 4 Indiana /Sullivan Intersection PCC 0 0 0 1,216 1,216 City 249 249 S STA 967 967 Replace asphalt pavement with portland cement concrete pavement. Funding secured - STA 0.3% sales tax levy approved, City Project #0113 Project Total 1,216 1 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, ani are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions. 6/18/2010 Page 1 �,,,,. � Draft 2011 - 2016 p0�1@ Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program valley Dollars in Thousands Funding Project / Description / Current Status Length PE RW CN Total Sources 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total 5 Pines Corridor ITS: Sprague to Trent 2.26 0 0 1,609 1,609 City 216 216 S CMAQ 1,393 1,393 Traffic Signal Control System for Corridor Funding Secured (SRTC 06 -26), City Project #0061 Project Total 1,609 1 6 Barker Road / BNSF Grade Separation (PE Only) 0 3,000 1,600 0 4,600 City P Other 1,507 2,141 3 Fed Other 298 424 722 Fed Construct Grade Separation at Barker /BNSF RR/ Trent (SR290) Other- 95 135 230 RR Federal Earmark Request submitted for $4.6 million in Feb. 2010 Project Total 1 2 4,600 7 Broadway @ Argonne /Mullan Intersections PCC 0 271 0 0 271 City 37 37 s (PE /RW Only) STP(U) 234 234 Reconstruct intersections in Concrete Pavement Funding secured for PE & RW (SRTC # ) Project Total 271 271 8 Mission Ave. - Flora Rd. to Barker Rd. (PE /RW 1 518 400 0 918 City 66 58 124 s Only) STP(U) 422 372 794 Reconstruct & widen to 3 lanes PE & RW Funding Secured, (SRTC # ) City Project #0123, Project Total 488 430 918 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, ani are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions. 6/18/2010 Page 2 �,,,,. � Draft 2011 - 2016 p0�1@ Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program � Valley Dollars in Thousands Funding Project / Description / Current Status Length PE RW CN Total Sources 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total 9 Pavement Management Program - Arterials 0 P Annual street preservation projects per PMP Currently No Source of Funds Indentified 2,400 0 21,600 24,000 City 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 12,000 Other 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 12,000 Fed 10 Pavement Management Program - Local Access 0 P Annual street preservation projects Currently No Source of Funds Identified Project Total 4,000 4 4,000 4 4 4 24 1,200 0 10,800 12,000 City 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 12 Project Total 2,000 2 2 2 2 2 12 11 STEP Paveback 0 0 0 602 602 City 518 518 P SW 84 84 Full -width paving and drainage associated with Spokane County's STEP City Funds Project Total 602 602 12 Sullivan / Euclid PCC Intersection (PE /RW Only) 0 163 0 0 163 City 22 22 S STP(U) 141 141 Reconstruct intersection in concrete pavement Funding secured for PE & RW, (SRTC # ) Project Total 163 163 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, ani are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions. 6/18/2010 Page 3 Sj10 �1@ Valley Project / Description / Current Status Draft 2011- 2016 Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program Dollars in Thousands Funding Length PE RW CN Total Sources 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total 13 Sullivan Road West Bridge 0.08 2,670 200 16,880 19,751 BR 534 1,148 614 6,752 6,752 P City FMSIB 134 287 154 1,688 1,688 Reconstruct and widen west bridge Project Total 668 1,435 768 8,440 8,440 15,800 3,951 19,751 14 Broadway Ave. Extension - Flora to Barker (PE 1 P Only) Re- construct new 3 -lane route connection 15 Evergreen /32nd -16th to 32nd, Evergreen to P SR27 (PE Only) Reconstruct as 3 -lane roadway City Project #0124 530 0 0 530 City Project Total 1.25 625 0 0 624 City Project Total 265 265 530 265 265 530 312 312 624 312 312 624 16 Park Road - #2 (RW & CN Only)- Broadway to 0.75 0 1,000 4,000 5,000 City P Indiana STP(U) Proj. #2 - Reconstruct and widen to 3 lanes with bike lanes and sidewalks. 135 540 675 865 3,460 4,325 Project Total 1,000 4,000 5,000 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, ani are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions. 6/18/2010 Page 4 �,,,,. � Draft 2011 - 2016 p0�1@ Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program valley Dollars in Thousands Funding Project / Description / Current Status Length PE RW CN Total Sources 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total 17 Saltese /Sullivan Signal 24 0 226 250 City 62 62 P Spo. Co. 25 25 Develop 163 163 ers Improvements to Intersection In Coordination w/ Spokane County, COSV only responsible for 1/4 of Project Cost Project Total 250 250 18 Sullivan Road Corridor Traffic Study (1 -90 to 2 200 0 0 200 City 27 27 p Wellesley) STP(U) 173 173 Conceptual Planning for Sullivan Road corridor improvements Project Total 200 200 19 University Rd /1 -90 Overpass Study 0 250 0 0 250 City 34 34 P STP(U) 216 216 Study of feasibility and benefits of overpass at University /1 -90 to Argonne /SR -27 Project Total 250 250 20 Broadway @ Argonne /Mullan Intersections PCC 0 0 0 2,075 2,075 City 280 280 P (CN Only) STP(U) 1,795 1,795 Reconstruct Intersections in Concrete pavement Project Total 2,075 2,075 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, ani are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions. 6/18/2010 Page 5 Sj10 �1@ Valley Project / Description / Current Status Draft 2011- 2016 Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program Dollars in Thousands Funding Length PE RW CN Total Sources 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total 21 Sullivan / Euclid PCC Intersection (CN Only) P Reconstruct intersection in concrete pavement 0 0 0 1,253 1,253 City 169 STP(U) 1,084 Project Total 1,253 169 1,084 1,253 22 Mission Ave. - Flora Rd. to Barker Rd. (CN Only) 1 0 0 3,969 3,969 City 536 536 P STP(U) 3,433 3,433 Reconstruct and widen to 3 -lanes City Project #123 Project Total 3,969 3,969 23 Barker Road - South City Limits to Appleway 0.75 473 0 0 472 City 236 236 472 P (PE Only) Reconstruct to 3 -lane roadway w/ center turn lane, sidewalks, curb & gutter and stormwater City Project #0125 Project Total 236 236 472 24 Bowdish Road - 32nd to 8th (PE Only) 1.52 768 0 0 768 City P STP(U) Reconstruct Roadway as 3 -lane section w/ curb, sidewalk and new stormwater facilities City Project #0121 52 52 104 332 332 664 Project Total 384 384 768 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, ani are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions. 6/18/2010 Page 6 Sj10 �1@ � Valle ' Project / Description / Current Status Draft 2011- 2016 Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program Dollars in Thousands Funding Length PE RW CN Total Sources 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total 25 Broadway Ave. Extension - Flora to Barker P (RW &CN Only) Reconstruct to 3- lanes, Flora to Barker 1 0 1,000 4,062 5,062 City UCP Project Total 100 100 812 1,012 400 400 3,250 4,050 500 500 4,062 5,062 26 Flora Road - Sprague to Mission (PE Only) P Reconstruct & widen to 3 -lane roadway 27 Sidewalk Infill Program P Fill in gaps in sidewalk system throughout city 1 431 0 0 432 City Project Total 0 360 240 1,200 1,800 City STP(E) Project Total 216 216 432 216 216 432 45 36 162 243 285 234 1,038 1,557 330 270 1,200 1,800 28 Evergreen ITS Improvements 1.5 76 50 582 708 City P CMAQ Traffic Control Systems Upgrades for Everg ree n(B roadway to 16th) 17 79 96 109 503 612 Project Total 126 582 708 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, ani are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions. 6/18/2010 Page 7 �,,,,. � Draft 2011 - 2016 p0�1@ Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program Walley Dollars in Thousands Funding Project / Description / Current Status Length PE RW CN Total Sources 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total 29 Evergreen /32nd -16th to 32nd, Evergreen to 1.25 P SR -27 (RW &CN Only) Reconstruct & Widen to 3 lanes City Project #0124 0 400 4,791 5,191 City STP(U) Project Total 54 647 701 346 4,144 4,490 400 4,791 5,191 30 Appleway Extension - University to Evergreen 2.02 P Extend Appleway Blvd. with a multi -lane facility including curbs and sidewalks. Secured STP(U) ($4.2 mil), WSDOT, City Project #0023 31 Greenacres Trail Planning Study (Sullivan Rd. P to Liberty Lake) Preliminary planning for Greenacres shared use pathway 406 0 0 210 0 0 406 City 127 127 STP 273 273 WSDOT 6 6 UCP Other Project Total 406 406 0 210 City 28 28 STP(E) 182 182 Project Total 210 210 32 Mansfield Extension - Pines(SR27) to 300 -ft east 0.21 136 0 0 136 City P of Houk Rd. UCP Construct 3 -lane arterial from Pines to Houk, Complete Gap Ranked #10 in Oct 2009 STP(U) Urban Improv. Appl. 136 136 Project Total 136 136 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, ani are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions. 6/18/2010 Page 8 �,,,,. � Draft 2011 - 2016 p0�1@ Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program Walley Dollars in Thousands Funding Project / Description / Current Status Length PE RW CN Total Sources 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total 33 Millwood Urban Trail, Fancher Rd. to Evergreen 5 439 0 0 439 City 59 5 P Rd. STP(E) 380 380 Shared use pathway along UP RR ROW Project Total 439 439 34 Park Road / BNSF Grade Separation 0.2 450 300 0 750 City P FMSIB Other Fed Reconstruct Park Road to separate the grades of Park Road and the BNSF railroad tracks. Other- "Other" Funding from BNSF RR 35 Sullivan Rd ITS, Sprague to 24th 1 .5 P Extend Traffic Control System for Corridor RR UCP Project Total 99 500 757 1,356 City CMAQ 31 31 227 227 364 364 37 37 91 91 750 750 183 183 1,173 1,173 Project Total 1,356 1,356 Totals: 15,734 5,690 76,710 98,134 14,040 16,170 15,314 16,106 16,572 19,932 98,134 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, ani are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions. 6/18/2010 Page 9 Spokane Val ey Draft 2011 - 2016 Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program Totals Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, ani are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions. 6/18/2010 Page 1 Secured Projects Planned Projects Totals Year Federal State Other City Total Federal State Other City Total Federal State Other City Total 2011 $2,832 $282 $1,007 $749 $4,870 $4,339 $134 $95 $4,602 $9,170 $7,171 $416 $1,102 $5,351 $14,040 2012 $372 $0 $0 $58 $430 $9,846 $287 $323 $5,284 $15,740 $10,218 $287 $323 $5,342 $16,170 2013 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $9,507 $154 $0 $5,653 $15,314 $9,507 $154 $0 $5,653 $15,314 2014 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $9,369 $2,088 $0 $4,649 $16,106 $9,369 $2,088 $0 $4,649 $16,106 2016 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $9,773 $2,088 $0 $4,711 $16,572 $9,773 $2,088 $0 $4,711 $16,572 2016 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,057 $3,574 $37 $6,264 $19,932 $10,057 $3,574 $37 $6,264 $19,932 Total $3,204 $282 $1,007 $807 $6,300 $62,891 $8,326 $466 $31,163 $92,834 $66,096 $8,607 $1,462 $31,970 $98,134 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, ani are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions. 6/18/2010 Page 1 City of Spokane Valley Department of Public Works Six Year Transportation Improvement Program Projects w/ No Currently Identified Local Match Within Existing Resources Dollars in Thousands Project Name Description Total Cost 32nd Avenue - Evergreen to Best Reconstruct and widen to three lanes with curbs $1,647 and sidewalks. 8th Avenue Phase 1- Carnahan to Reconstruct 8th Ave. to a three -lane section with $2,868 Havana curb, gutter, sidewalks and bike lanes. 8th Avenue Phase 2 - Park to Dickey Reconstruct 8th Ave. to a three -lane section with $4,188 curb, gutter, sidewalks and bike lanes. 8th Avenue Phase 3 - Dickey to Reconstruct 8th Ave. to a three -lane section with $3,754 Carnahan curb, gutter, sidewalks and bike lanes. Appleway Extension - Evergreen to Extend Appleway Blvd. with a multi -lane facility $17,381 Tshirley including curbs and sidewalks. Barker Road - Appleway to Reconstruct to a 3 -lane arterial with center turn $2,596 Broadway Avenue lane from Appleway to Broadway Ave.; realign Broadway east of Barker Barker Road - South City Limits to Reconstruct to 3 -lane roadway w/ center turn $3,978 Appleway (RW &CN Only) lane, sidewalks, curb & gutter and stormwater Barker Road - Spokane River to Trent Reconstruct to a 2 -lane curbed arterial $5,872 Bowdish Road - 32nd to 8th (RW /CN Reconstruct & widen to 3 -lane roadway $6,539 Only) Carnahan Truck Lane - 8th to City Add SB truck Lane to road $5,034 Limits, Euclid Ave/ Flora Rd - Flora, Euclid Reconstruct to provide a 2 -lane, shouldered $5,550 to Euclid; Euclid, Flora to Barker arterial Flora Road - Sprague to Mission Reconstruct & widen to 3 -lane roadway $3,806 (RW & CN Only) Park Road - #3 - Sprague to Reconstruct and widen to a standard three -lane $3,359 Broadway arterial street with curbs and sidewalks Park Road #4, South City Limits to Reconstruct and widen roadway with sidewalk, $1,761 8th curb, and stormwater facilities Pines Corridor ITS: Sprague to 16th Traffic Signal Control System for Corridor $785 Sprague / Barker Traffic Signal Install Traffic Signal $457 Sullivan / Kiernan PCC Reconstruct Intersection in PCC $1,352 Sullivan Road North Extension Reconstruct and widen the Sullivan Road $55 (Bigelow Gulch) extension north also known as Bigelow Gulch Road to a 4 -lane roadway with 8 -foot shoulders and a 12 -foot two way left turn lane. Sullivan Road, 1 -90 to Wellesley Reconstruct urban arterial. $11,500 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, and are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions. Friday, June 18, 2010 Page 1 of 2 City of Spokane Valley Department of Public Works Six Year Transportation Improvement Program Projects w/ No Currently Identified Local Match Within Existing Resources Dollars in Thousands Project Name Trent (SR290) - Del Ray to Barker Turn Lane Description Widen Trent from Barker to Del Ray to accommodate Turning traffic movements Total Cost $532 $1,515 Totals: $84,529 University /Sprague Intersection PCC Replace asphalt pavement with portland cement concrete pavement. Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, and are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions. Friday, June 18, 2010 Page 2 of 2 City of Spokane Valley Department of Public Works Six Year Transportation Improvement Program 2011 - 2016 Dollars in Thousands 2011 2011 Totals: $5,351 $14,040 2012 Item # Project Name Primary Source City Amount Total Amount 1 Park Road - # 2 (PE Only)- Broadway to Indiana, STP(U) 5 35 2 Indiana Ave Extension - 3600' e/o Sullivan Rd to UCP 53 375 14 Mission & Flora City 265 265 3 Argonne Road - 190 to Trent, CMAQ 101 713 4 Indiana /Sullivan Intersection PCC STA 249 1,216 5 Pines Corridor ITS: Sprague to Trent CMAQ 216 1,609 6 Barker Road / BNSF Grade Separation (PE Only) Other Fed 0 1,900 7 Broadway @ Argonne /Mullan Intersections PCC STP(U) 37 271 17 (PE /RW Only) Developers 62 250 8 Mission Ave. - Flora Rd. to Barker Rd. (PE /RW STP(U) 66 488 Only) 9 Pavement Management Program - Arterials Other Fed 2,000 4,000 10 Pavement Management Program - Local Access City 2,000 2,000 11 STEP Paveback City 602 602 12 Sullivan / Euclid PCC Intersection (PE /RW Only) STP(U) 22 163 13 Sullivan Road West Bridge BR 0 668 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, and are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions. Added Projects are shown in Green Funded Projects are shown in Blue Friday, June 18, 2010 Page 1 of 3 2011 Totals: $5,351 $14,040 2012 9 Pavement Management Program - Arterials Other Fed Item # Project Name Primary Source City Amount Total Amount 6 Barker Road / BNSF Grade Separation (PE Only) Other Fed 0 2,700 8 Mission Ave. - Flora Rd. to Barker Rd. (PE /RW STP(U) 58 430 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, and are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions. Added Projects are shown in Green Funded Projects are shown in Blue Friday, June 18, 2010 Page 1 of 3 Only) 9 Pavement Management Program - Arterials Other Fed 2,000 4,000 10 Pavement Management Program - Local Access City 2,000 2,000 13 Sullivan Road West Bridge BR 0 1,435 14 Broadway Ave. Extension - Flora to Barker (PE City 265 265 Only) 15 Evergreen /32nd - 16th to 32nd, Evergreen to City 312 312 SR27 (PE Only) 16 Park Road - #2 (RW & CN Only)- Broadway to STP(U) 135 1,000 Indiana 17 Saltese /Sullivan Signal Developers 62 250 18 Sullivan Road Corridor Traffic Study (1 -90 to STP(U) 27 200 Wellesley) 19 University Rd /1 -90 Overpass Study STP(U) 34 250 20 Broadway @ Argonne /Mullan Intersections PCC STP(U) 280 2,075 (CN Only) 21 Sullivan / Euclid PCC Intersection (CN Only) STP(U) 169 1,253 2012 Totals: $5,342 $16,170 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, and are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions. Added Projects are shown in Green Funded Projects are shown in Blue Friday, June 18, 2010 Page 1 of 3 2013 2013 Totals: $5,653 $15,314 Item # Project Name Primary Source City Amount Total Amount 9 Pavement Management Program - Arterials Other Fed 2,000 4,000 10 Pavement Management Program - Local Access City 2,000 2,000 13 Sullivan Road West Bridge BR 0 768 14 Broadway Ave. Extension - Flora to Barker (PE City 265 265 23 Only) City 236 236 15 Evergreen /32nd - 16th to 32nd, Evergreen to City 312 312 SR27 (PE Only) 16 Park Road - #2 (RW & CN Only)- Broadway to STP(U) 540 4,000 Indiana 22 Mission Ave. - Flora Rd. to Barker Rd. (CN Only) STP(U) 536 3,969 Only) 24 Bowdish Road - 32nd to 8th (PE Only) STP(U) 52 384 25 Broadway Ave. Extension - Flora to Barker UCP 100 500 (RW &CN Only) 26 Flora Road - Sprague to Mission (PE Only) City 216 216 27 Sidewalk Infill Program STP(E) 45 330 2013 Totals: $5,653 $15,314 2014 Item # Project Name Primary Source City Amount Total Amount 9 Pavement Management Program - Arterials Other Fed 2,000 4,000 10 Pavement Management Program - Local Access City 2,000 2,000 13 Sullivan Road West Bridge BR 0 8,440 23 Barker Road - South City Limits to Appleway (PE City 236 236 Only) 24 Bowdish Road - 32nd to 8th (PE Only) STP(U) 52 384 25 Broadway Ave. Extension - Flora to Barker UCP 100 500 (RW &CN Only) 26 Flora Road - Sprague to Mission (PE Only) City 216 216 27 Sidewalk Infill Program STP(E) 45 330 Only) 24 Bowdish Road - 32nd to 8th (PE Only) 25 Broadway Ave. Extension - Flora to Barker (RW &CN Only) 26 Flora Road - Sprague to Mission (PE Only) 27 Sidewalk Infill Program 28 Evergreen ITS Improvements 29 Evergreen /32nd - 16th to 32nd, Evergreen to SR- 27 (RW &CN Only) STP(U) 52 384 UCP 100 500 City 216 216 STP(E) 36 270 CMAQ 17 126 STP(U) 54 400 2015 Totals: $4,711 $16,572 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, and are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions. Added Projects are shown in Green Funded Projects are shown in Blue Friday, June 18, 2010 Page 2 of 3 2014 Totals: $4,649 $16,106 2015 Item # Project Name Primary Source City Amount Total Amount 9 Pavement Management Program - Arterials Other Fed 2,000 4,000 10 Pavement Management Program - Local Access City 2,000 2,000 13 Sullivan Road West Bridge BR 0 8,440 23 Barker Road - South City Limits to Appleway (PE City 236 236 Only) 24 Bowdish Road - 32nd to 8th (PE Only) 25 Broadway Ave. Extension - Flora to Barker (RW &CN Only) 26 Flora Road - Sprague to Mission (PE Only) 27 Sidewalk Infill Program 28 Evergreen ITS Improvements 29 Evergreen /32nd - 16th to 32nd, Evergreen to SR- 27 (RW &CN Only) STP(U) 52 384 UCP 100 500 City 216 216 STP(E) 36 270 CMAQ 17 126 STP(U) 54 400 2015 Totals: $4,711 $16,572 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, and are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions. Added Projects are shown in Green Funded Projects are shown in Blue Friday, June 18, 2010 Page 2 of 3 2016 Item # Project Name Primary Source City Amount Total Amount 9 Pavement Management Program - Arterials Other Fed 2,000 4,000 10 Pavement Management Program - Local Access City 2,000 2,000 25 Broadway Ave. Extension - Flora to Barker UCP 812 4,062 (RW &CN Only) 27 Sidewalk Infill Program STP(E) 162 1,200 28 Evergreen ITS Improvements CMAQ 79 582 29 Evergreen /32nd - 16th to 32nd, Evergreen to SR- STP(U) 647 4,791 27 (RW &CN Only) 30 Appleway Extension - University to Evergreen STP 127 406 31 Greenacres Trail Planning Study (Sullivan Rd. to STP(E) 28 210 Liberty Lake) 32 Mansfield Extension - Pines(SR27) to 300 -ft east City 136 136 of Houk Rd. 33 Millwood Urban Trail, Fancher Rd. to Evergreen STP(E) 59 439 Rd. 34 Park Road / BNSF Grade Separation Other Fed 31 750 35 Sullivan Rd ITS, Sprague to 24th CMAQ 183 1,356 2016 Totals: $6,264 $19,932 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, and are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions. Added Projects are shown in Green Funded Projects are shown in Blue Friday, June 18, 2010 Page 3 of 3 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: June 29, 2010 City Manager Sign -off: Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ® new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Motion Consideration: Bid Award — Sprague /Sullivan PCC Intersection Project ( #0065) GOVERNING LEGISLATION: PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Council discussion on list of projects for SRTC Call for Projects, August 28, 2006; Council approval of federal grant application for project, September 12, 2006; Adopted the 2008 -2013, 2009 -2014, and 2010 -2015 Six Year TIPs which included the Sullivan /Sprague Intersection PCC Project; Info RCA on upcoming 2010 Public Works Project Council Actions, February 16, 2010; Info RCA on Summer Construction — Sullivan Road Corridor, May 4, 2010; Discussion with council on Full vs Partial Closure, May 18, 2010 BACKGROUND: This project will replace the heavily rutted asphalt pavement with Portland Cement Concrete and reconstruct pedestrian ramps to meet Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements. Public Works staff prepared the plans and specifications. The project was advertised for bids beginning May 28, 2010. Bids were opened on Friday, June 18, 2010. The project is funded by a Federal STP(U) grant that will fund 86.5% of the project cost up to a maximum grant amount of $1,111,111. The project bid included two scopes: Schedule A and a larger scope as Schedule B. The bid documents gave the City the option of awarding the largest scope that came within the project budget. The $835,000 bid from Acme Concrete Paving, Inc. is the lowest responsible bid for Schedule B, and it is within the project budget. See the attached Bid Tabulation. OPTIONS: 1) Award contract to lowest responsible bidder; 2) Provide additional direction to staff. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to authorize the City Manager to finalize and execute the bid award contract for the Sprague /Sullivan PCCP Intersection Project to the lowest responsible bidder, Acme Concrete Paving, Inc. for $835,000. BUDGET /FINANCIAL IMPACTS: There are sufficient resources within the 2010 Capital Projects budget to cover the estimated $112,725 in local matching funds. STAFF CONTACT: Steve M. Worley, P.E. — Senior Capital Projects Engineer Neil Kersten, AIA — Public Works Director ATTACHMENTS: Bid Tabulation BID TABULATION Sprague ! Sullivan PCCP Intersection Project CIP No. 0065 BID OPENING DATE - June 18, 2010 10:00 A. M. SpUaRe ley o f v+ras,y, g C , Engineor's EsUmato Acme Concrete Paving, Inc, Camoron- Reilly, LLC or Co t NUM ER 1 ITEM MOBILIZATION Unit LS. QU ANTIT Y 1 Unit Price 87 000,00 Total Cost $87 Unit Price $31 042.79 Total Cost $31 Unit Price $42 Tatat Cost $42 Unit Pric $64 0W,0D A ' $64 000.00 . 2 CONSTRUCTION SURVEYING l 5. 1 $5 S50500!00 $5 500.00 $14,000.00 $14.000.00 $7,000.00 $7,000.00' 3 SPCC PLAN L.S. 1 $500.00 $550.00 $550.00 $750.00 $750.00 S500.00 5500.00 4 EROSION CONTROL LS. 1 $1 000.00 $600.00 $600,00 $1 500.OD $1,500.00 $525.00 5525.00 5 PROJECT TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL L.S, 1 $10,000,00 $u6 000.00 $36 000100 $56 260,00 556 260.00 $69,000,00 $69 000.00 6 PEDESTRIAN CONTROL AND PROTECTION LS. 1 15.00 $2.000.00 $9,700.00 $9,700.00 $7,400.00 $7,400.00 $7.500.00 $7,500.00 7 SAWCUT AC PAVEMENT LF -IN 2700 $2700.00 $0.80 $2160.00 50.75 $2025.00 $0.50 $1350.00 8 REMOVE PCC MEDIAN CURB AND ISLAND S.Y. 340 $1 $10.00 $3400.00 $7.00 $2360.00 $4.65 $1 581.00 9 REMOVE PCC CURB AND GUTTER L.F. 270 $1,350.00 $4.OD $1 52.00 $540.00 $3.45 $931,50 10 REMOVE PCC SIDEWALK! DRIVEWAY APPROACH SY, 160 $800.00 $7.00 $1,120.00 $7.00 $1,120.00 $4.00 $640.00 11 ABANDON EXISTING DRYWELL EACH 2 1,400.00 $2,800.00 $490,OD $960,00 $650.00 $1 300.00 $50000 $1,000.00 12 REMOVElASANDON EXISTING CATCH13ASIN EACH 4 700.00 $2800.00 $435.00 $1740.00 $500.00 S2000.OD $400.00 $1600.00 13 CONDUIT TRENCH EXCAVATION LF. 240 $10.OD $2400,00 $13A0 $3120.00 $4.00 3960.00 $5.50 $1320.00 14 BITUMINOUS PLANING 2 INCH DEPTH S.Y. 1420 $7.00 $9940.OD S4,C0 $5680.00 $2.50 $3550100 54.00 $5680,00 15 ROADWAY EXCAVATION INCL. HAUL C.Y. 1850 S15.0D $27750.00 WC50 $39775.00 $22.00 $40700.00 $9.50 $17575.00 16 UNSUITABLE FOUNDATION EXCAVATION INCL HAUL C.Y. 1670 $15.00 $25050.00 $6,21 $10,370.70 $7.00 $11 57.00 $19 690,00 17 GRAVELBASE C.Y. 1670 1D.00 $96700.00 $10.34 $17267.80 $15.00 $25050.00 $28.00 $4676D.00 18 ICRUSHED SURFACING SALVAGE C.Y. 10DO 15.00 $15 00D.00 $16.30 $16 300.OD $17.00 $17,000A0 $19.00 S19 19 GEOGRID S.Y. 2260 10.00 S22,600.00 $9.50 $21,470.00 $4.00 S9 040.00 $7,00 $15 820.00 20 HMA Cl- 12 IN. PG70 -28 TON 1160 95.00 $110200,00 $6625 $76850,00 $66.00 $99760.00 $67.00 $77720.00 21 HMA CL. 1I2 IN. PG70 -28.17 Ft DEPTH Sy 1420 40,00 $56600.0 $10.00 $14200.00 310.00 $14200.00 $9.50 $13490.00 22 HMA CL 112 IN. PG 70-28..58 Ft DEPTH SY 60 150.00 S9 $93.00 $5,580,01) $60.06 $3600.00 $90.00 $6,400.00 23 COMMERCIAL HMA .17 Ft DEPTH Sy 20 100,00 $2 000.00 $67.00 $1,740A0 $60.00 $1 $84.00 $1 24 ANTISTRIPPINGADDITIVE EST. 1 1000.00 $1000.00 $1000.00 $1000.00 $1000.00 $1000.00 $1000.00 $1000.00 25 JOB MIX COMPLIANCE PRICE ADJUSTMENT CALC 1 1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 26 COMPACTION PRICE ADJUSTMENT CALC 1 1.00 $1.00 $1,00 $1.00 $1.00 $1,00 $1.00 27 CEMENTCONC. PAVEMENT 11 IN. THIC INCL DOWELS S,Y. 4420 25.00 $110500.00 $111605.00 $44.00 $194480.00 $33,00 $145860.00 28 FURNISHING CONCRETE FOR CEMENT CONCRETE PAVEMENT C.Y. 136D 95.00 $129200.00 $130560.00 $100.00 $136000.00 $102.00 $138720.00 29 PORTLAND CEMENT CONC, COMPLIANCE ADJUSTMENT CALC 1 1.00 $1.00 $1.00 M$520AOS4,160.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 30 TRENCH EXCAVATION SAFETY SYSTEM L.S. 1 2 000.OD $2 000.00 $1 500.00 $750.00 $750.00 $1.00 $1.00 31 ADJUST EXISTING MANHOLE CATCHRASIN OR DRYWELL EACH 8 500.00 $4 000.00 $4,160.00 $500.00 S4000.OD $160.00 S1,280.00 32 ADJUSTEXISTINGVALVEBOX EACH 13 250.00 $3250.OD $5200.00 $160,00 $2080.00 $82.00 $1066.00 33 SOLID WALL PVC STORM SEWER PIPE 101N. DIAM. L.F. 150 50.00 $7500.00 $6 600.00 $33,00 $4950,00 $1603 $2 34 MANHOLE FRAME AND GRATE INCL. ADJ. EACH 2 2,000.00 $4.DOD.00 $820.00 $1 640.00 $625.00 $1.250.00 $320.0D $640.00 35 CATCH BASIN TYPE I EACH 4 3,500,00 S14 $1 $6 S1 $6800.00 $1 30Q.00 55200.00 36 CATCH BASIN TYPE 2 EACH 4 3,500,00 $14 $1 $7 600,OD $2 000.00 $8 $2 00000 " 37 SPILL CONTROL SEPARATOR EACH 4 500,00 $2 000,00 $215.00 $860,00 $175.00 $700,00 $260.00 $1,040,00 38 EXISTING DRYWELL CONNECTION EACH 2 1 2 000,00 $4 $510.00 $1 $550.00 $1 $215.00 $430100 39 PRECAST CONCRETE DRYWELL TYPE B EACH 2 1 3000.00 $6000.00 $3000.00 $6000.00 $3500.00 $7000.00 $2600.00 $5 40 CONCRETE TRAFFIC ISLAND 24 IN, WIDE LF. 840 1 20.00 $16800.00 $93.00 $10920.0 $12.00 $14080.DO $13.80 $11 59200 41 CEMENT CONC. TRAFFIC CURB AND GUTTER L.F. 270 1 20.00 $5400.00 $19.00 $5130,00 $20,00 $5.4DO.00 519.50 $5265.00 42 CEMENT CONC. SIDEWALK S.Y. 160 40.00 $6400.00 $29.00 $4640.00 $40.00 $6400.00 $2200 $3520.00 43 CEMENT CONCRETE CURB RAMP TYPE 2 EACH 3 1,000.00 S13,000.00 $700,00 S2 $75D.00 S2,250.00 $600.00 $1,8D0.00 44 CEMENT CONCRETE PEDESTRIAN CURB LF. 90 15.00 . $1 , 350.00 $13.00 $1 $15.00 $1350.00 $92,00 $1 060.00 45 SOO INSTALLATION S.Y. 12 50.00 $600.00 $29.0 5348.60 $20.00 $240.00 519.00 5228.00 46 BARK MULCH S.Y. 15 30.00 $450.00 $29.00 5435.00 $20.00 5300.00 $18.00 $270.00 47 CONDUIT PIPE 2 IN. DIA. LF. 1160 9.00 $10440.00 54.00 $4640.00 $9100 $10440.00 $3.80 $4,408.60 48 CONDUIT PIPE 3 IN, DIA< L.F. 740 10.00 $7,400.00 $9.50 $7,030.00 $9.25 $6 845.00 $9.30 $6882_00 49 PULL BOX EACH 1 3 0.00 $3.500.00 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $2 $2,500.00 $2 $2 50 JUNCTION sox -TYPE 2 EACH 3 1 $300D.00 $600.00 $1.800.00 $525.00 $1575.00 $535.00 $1 51 JUNCTION BOX -TYPE 8 EACH 4 1000.00 3400D.00 $1400.00 $5600.00 $1100.00 $4400.00 $1250.60 $5006.00 52 INDUCTION LOOP TYPE 2OR TYPE 3 EACH 44 500.00 $22000.00 $435.00 S19140.0D $440.00 $1936000 $416.00 $18040,00 53 INDUCTION LOOP PRE - FORMED BICYCLE EACH 15 750.00 $11;250.00 5550.00 $8 $440.00 $6600.00 $520.00 $7800.00 54 TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS LS. 1 29 000100 S29,000,00 521,0D0.00 $21,000.00 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 $19 500.00 S19 500.00 55 GROOVED PLASTIC CROSSWALK LINE S.F. 900 18.00 $16 00.00 $9.45 $8505.00 $8.00 $7200,00 $9.00 $8100.00 56 IPAINTLINE LF. 1910 0.50 $955.00 $0.37 %706.70 50.40 $764.00 $0,40 $764.00 57 IPAINTED WIDE LINE LF. 830 1 0,501 5415.00 $0.80 $664.00 $0.90 $747.00 $0.85 $705.50 58 PAINTED TRAFFIC ARROW EACH 15 1 80.001 $1200.00 $49.00 $735.00 $40.OD $600,00 $50.00 5750.00 59 GROOVED PLASTIC STOP LINE L,F, 185 28.00 $5180.00 $12.00 $2220.00 $13,00 $2405.00 $13.00 $2405.40 60 SURVEY MONUMENT EACH 1 1000,00 $1000.00 $600.00 $ 600,00 $500.OD $500.00 $400.00 $400.00 61 DELINEATOR AND COREHOI.E EACH 4 400.001 $1600,00 $98.00 1 $392.00 $175,00 $700.DO $150.00 5600.00 62 BULLNOSE MARKER 261.50 I $84.,50 $400.00 1 $1200.00 $400.OD $1,200.00 5410.00 $1,230.00 s... ,..:,.,R ;.. � ., € 3a YE w is Engineees Estimate Acme Concrete Paving, Inc. Cameron - Reilly, LLC Wm Wlnlder Co. ITEM NUMBER ITEM Unit QUANTITY Unit Price Total Cost Unit Price Total Cost Unit Price Total Cost Unit Price Total Cost 1 MOBILIZATION L.S. 1 101.60D.00 $101 605.00 S28.29130 b $28 $48.000.00 $48 000.00 $64,000.00 $64 , 000.00 2 CONSTRUCTION SURVEYING L.S. 1 6 $5 000.OD $5.500m 1 $5,500.00 S17 $17 000,00 S7,000.00 $7,000.00 3 SPCC PLAN LS_ 1 500.00 $500.00 $550.00 1 $ 550.00 $500.00 5500.00 $500.00 $50D.00 4 EROSION CONTROL L.S. 1 1 $1 000.00 $60400 $600.00 $500.00 $500A0 $525.00 $525,00 5 PROJECT TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL LS. 1 10 $10,000.00 336,W0.00 $36 ,000.00 $56 260.00 $58;260.00 $69 $69 6 PEDESTRIAN CONTROL AND PROTECTION LS. 1 2000.00 52000.00 $9 $8700.00 $7400-00 $7400.00 $750400 $7500.00 7 SAWCUTAC PAVEMENT LF4N 2450 1100 $2450.00 $0.80 $1960.00 $0.75 $1837.50 $0.50 $1225.00 8 REMOVE PCC MEDIAN CURB AND ISLAND S.Y. 440 5 .00 $2 00.00 $10.00 S4 $7.00 $3,080,00 54.65 $2,046.00 9 REMOVE PCC CURB AND GUTTER LF, 280 5.00 $1 54.00 $1,120.00 $2.00 $560.00 $345 $966.00 10 REMOVE PCC SIDEWALK DRIVEWAY APPROACH S.Y. 170 5.00 $850.00 $7.00 $1 190AD $7.00 $1 $4.00 5680.00 11 ABANDON EXISTING DRYWELL EACH 4 1 $5605,00 $49400 $1 $650.00 $2,600.00 $500.00 $2 12 REMOVEIABANDON EXISTING CATCHBASIN EACH 3 700.00 $2 $435.03 $1,305.00 $500.00 $1 $400.00 $1 200.00 13 CONDUIT TRENCH EXCAVATION L.F. 115 $10.00 $1150.00 1 $13,00 $149500 $4.00 $460.00 $5.50 $632.50 14 BITUMINOUS PLANING 2 INCH DEPTH S.Y. 740 $7.00 $5180.00 $5.00 $3700.00 $4.00 $2960.00 $5.50 $4070,00 15 ROADWAY EXCAVATION INCL HAUL C.Y. 2400 $15.00 $36 000.00 $21.50 $51 $21.00 $50400.00 $9.50 = 16 UNSUITABLE FOUNDATION EXCAVATION INCL HAUL C.Y_ 2260 $15-00 $33900.00 $6.21 $14034.60 57.00 $15820.00 $7.00 $15820.00 17 GRAVELBASE G.Y. 2260 1 10.00 $22600.00 $10,34 $23368.45 $18.00 $38150.00 $28.00 $63280.00 18 CRUSHED SURFACING SALVAGE C.Y. 1400 15.00 $21000.00 $16.30 =,=,Do $17.00 $23800.00 $19.00 $26600.00 19 GEOGRID S.Y. 3420 10.OD $34 $9.50 $32490.00 $4.50 $15390,00 $700 $23940.00 20 HMA CL 12 IN, PG 70-28 TON 1580 95.00 $15D $66,25 $104 $83.00 $131 140.00 $67.00 $105 21 HMA CL. 1121N. PG 70-28_17 Ft DEPTH SY 740 40.00 $29 600.00 $10.70 $7,918.00 $11.00 $8 $9.90 $7 326.00 22 HMA CL 12 IN, PG 70-28 .58 Ft DEPTH SY 26 150.00 $3 $141.00 $3,666.00 $81.00 $2106.00 $135.00 $3 510.00 23 COMMERCIAL H .17 Ft DEPTH SY 20 100100 $200D.00 $130.00 $2,600.00 $60.00 $1,200.0D $125.00 $2,500.00 24 ANTISTRIPPINGADDITIVE EST. 1 1,00 $1,00 $1000,30 $1000.00 $1000.00 $1000.00 $1000.06 $9000.00 25 JOB MIX COMPLIANCE PRICE ADJUSTMENT CALC 1 1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 26 COMPACTION PRICE ADJUSTMENT CALC 1 1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1,00 $1.00 51.00 $1.00 $1.00 27 CEMENT CONC. PAVEMENT 111N. THICK INCL DOWELS S.Y. 5600 2500 $140000.00 $24.50 S137200.0D $44.00 W46400.00 $2$00 $156800.00 28 FURNISHING CONCRETE FOR CEMENT CONCRETE PAVEMENT C.Y. 1720 95.00 $163400.00 $96.00 $165120.00 $100.00 $172 000.00 $103.00 $172,000.00 29 PORTLAND CEMENT CONC. COMPLIANCE ADJUSTMENT CALL 1 1,00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 30 ITRENCH EXCAVATION SAFETY SYSTEM L.S. 1 2,000.00 $2,000.00 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $750.00 $750,00 $1.00 51.00 31 1ADJUST EXISTING MANHOLE CATCHBASIN OR DRYWELL EACH 9 500.00 $4500.00 $520.00 $4680.00 $450.00 54050.00 $160.00 $1 32 1ADJUST EXISTING VALVE BOX EACH 15 250,00 $3750.00 $407.00 $5105.00 $175.00 $2 $82.00 S1,230.00 33 ISOLID WALL PVG STORM SEWER PIPE 10 IN. DIAM. L.F. 190 50.00 $9 $43.00 $8 170.00 $35,00 $6650.00 $18.00 $3420.00 34 1 DUCTILE IRON STORM SEWER PIPE 10 IN. DL4M. LF. 10 100.00 Si ,0D0.00 $97.00 $970.00 $80.00 $800.00 $70.00 $700.00 35 IMANHOLE FRAME AND GRATE INCL ADJ. EACH 2 2.000.00 $4,000.0 $815.00 $1630.00 $625,OD $1 $320.00 $640.00 36 ICONCRETE INLET EACH 1 2000.00 $2000.00 $1300.00 $1300.00 $1250.00 _ $I 250.00 $70,00 $70,00 37 1 CATCH BASIN TYPE IL EACH 6 3500.00 $17500.00 $1575.00 $7875.00 $1700.00 $8500.00 $1300.00 $6500.00 38 CATCH BASIN TYPE 2 EACH 8 3,500.00, $21 000.00 $1 $11 $2,000,00 $12,000.00 $2 $12,000.00 39 SPILL CONTROL SEPARATOR EACH 6 500.00 $3000.00 $218.00 $1308.00 $175.00 $1050.00 $260.00 $1560.00 40 EXISTINGDRYWELLCONNECTION EACH 2 2000.00 $4000.00 $516.00 $1032.00 $550.00 $1100.00 $215.00 $430.00 41 PRECAST CONCRETE DRYWELL, TYPES EACH 4 3COO.OD $12000.00 $3000.00 $12000.00 $3400.00 $13600.00 $2 $13400.00 42 CONCRETETRAFFIC ISLAND 241N. WIDE LF. 980 20.00 $19600.00 $13.00 $12740.00 $12.00 $11760.00 $13.80 $13524.00 43 CEMENT CONIC. TRAFFIC CURBAND GUTTER LF. 280 20.00 $5600.00 $19.00 $5320.00 $20.30 $5600.00 $19.50 $5460.00 44 CEMENT CONIC. SIDEWALK S.Y. 170 40,00 $6800.00 $29.00 $4930.00 $40.00 WAWA() $22.00 $3740.00 45 CEMENT CONCRETE CURB RAMP TYPE2 EACH 3 1000,00 $300000 $700.00 $2100.00 $750.00 $2250.00 $600.00 $9800.00 46 CEMENT CONCRETE PEDESTRIAN CURB L.F. 90 15.00 31 $13,00 $1 $15.00 $1,350.00 $12.00 $1 47 SOD INSTALLATION S.Y. 13 5D.00 $65000 529.00 $377.00 $20.00 $260.00 $19,00 $247,00 48 BARK MULCH S.Y. 17 30.00 $510.00 $29.00 $493.00 $20.00 $340.00 $18.00 $306.00 49 CONDU4T PIPE 2 IN. DW LF. 1160 8.00 $928400 $4.00 54640.00 $9.00 $10440.00 $3,80 $4406.00 50 CONDUIT PIPE 31N. DI& LF, 740 900 $6860.00 $9.50 $7030.00 $9.25 S6 64500 $9.30 $6882.00 51 PULL BOX EACH 1 3 $3 $2,600.00 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 S2.200,00 S2 200.00 52 JUNCTION BOX -TYPE 2 EACH 3 1000.00 53000.00 $600.00 $1800.00 3525.0D $1575,00 $535.00 $150500 53 JUNCTION BOX - TYPE & EACH 4 1000.00 $4000.00 $1400.00 $5600.00 51100.00 $4400.00 $1 $5000.00 54 INDUCTION LOOP TYPE 2 OR TYPE 3 EACH 44 5000D $22 000.00 $435.00 $19140.00 5450.00 $19 800.00 5410.00 $18,040.00 55 INDUCTION LOOP PRE - FORMED BICYCLE EACH 15 750.00 $11,250.00 $550.00 $8 50.00 $450,0D $6750.00 $520.00 $7,800.00 56 TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS LS. 1 29 000.00 $29 000.00 $29 000,00 $21 S20 000.00 $20,000.00 $19 $19 57 GROOVED PLASTIC CROSSWALK LINE S.F. 900 18.00 $16 $9.45 $8505.50 $8.00 $7200.00 $9.00 $8100.00 58 PAINT LINE L.F. 2510 0.50 $1,255.00 $0.37 $928.70 $0.40 $1,004.00 $0.40 $1 59 PAINTED WIDE LINE L.F. 940 0.50 $470.00 $0.80 $752.00 $0.70 $658.00 $0.85 $799.00 60 PAINTED TRAFFIC ARROW EACH 15 80.00 $1,200.00 $49.00 $735.D0 $40.00 $60000 $50.00 $750.00 61 GROOVED PLASTIC STOP LINE LF. 185 28.00 $5180.00 $12.00 $2220.00 $14.00 52590.00 $13,00 $2405.00 62 SURVEY MONUMENT EACH 1 1 G.OD $1 $600.00 $ 600.00 $500.00 $500.00 $400.00 $400.00 63 DELINEATOR AND GORE HOLE EACH 4 400.OD $1600.00 $98.00 $392.00 $175,00 $700.00 5150.00 5600.00 (A I BULLNOSE MARKER EACH 1 4 281.50 31,126.00 $400.00 $1,800.00 $400.00 $1,600.00 $410.00 $1,640.00 ., V � Engineer's Estimate Acme Concrete Paving, Inc. Cameron - Reilly, LLC Wm Wlnlder Co. SCHEDULE $699,999.99 $840,862.00 $787.04700 -Imo ...... .......... - 1 :.... -_.. .... .. .. ..__. Rl7A= RNRTP-!18Ign;i;SCHERIILFJS $1.016215.00 $835,000.00 $? .018.553.50 $908,464.50 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: June 29, 2010 City Manager Sign -off: Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ® new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Motion Consideration: Bid Award — Broadway Reconstruction Project ( #0088) GOVERNING LEGISLATION: PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Authorized Mayor to sign Fuel Tax Grant Distribution Agreement with the Transportation Improvement Board (TIB) for the design and construction of the Broadway Avenue Reconstruction — Moore to Flora Project on January 22, 2008; Adopted the 2010 -2015 Six Year TIP, Resolution 09 -009 on June 16, 2009 which included the Broadway Avenue Reconstruction — Moore to Flora Project; Admin Report at 2/23/10 Council meeting. Surplus Property Authorization on March 9, 2010; Info Memo on June 8, 2010. BACKGROUND: The City of Spokane Valley received a grant from the Transportation Improvement Board (TIB). Under the grant agreement, TIB will fund 79.5% of the project cost, up to a maximum of $2,415,465. The Broadway Avenue Reconstruction Project (from Moore Rd to Flora Rd) will be built in conjunction with the Spokane County White Birch Sanitary Sewer Project east of Conklin Rd. From Moore Road to Conklin Road, Broadway Avenue will be widened to a five lane section (two lanes each way with a center turn lane) and curb and sidewalk will be extended on the south side. Between Conklin Rd and the east side of Kohls' Broadway Avenue will transition from five lanes to three lanes. East of Kohl's Broadway Avenue will be widened to a three lane section (one lane each way with a center turn lane) and new curb, gutter and sidewalk will be built on both sides. A one lane roundabout will be constructed at the intersection of Broadway Avenue and Flora Road. The project includes a stormwater system draining to several large swales. Contract documents were prepared by City staff; the project was advertised for bid on June 4; bids scheduled to be opened on Friday, June 25. OPTIONS: 1) Award contract to lowest responsible bidder; 2) Provide additional direction to staff. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to authorize the City Manager to finalize and execute the bid award contract for the Broadway Reconstruction Project to the lowest responsible bidder , in the amount of $ (Staff will provide contractor name and bid amount after the bid opening on June 25.) BUDGET /FINANCIAL IMPACTS: There are sufficient resources within the 2010 Capital Projects budget to cover the local matching funds. STAFF CONTACT: Steve M. Worley, P.E. — Senior Capital Projects Engineer Neil Kersten, AIA — Public Works Director CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: June 29, 2010 City Manager Sign -off: Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ® old business ® new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Motion Consideration: Broadway Avenue Safety Project #0063 GOVERNING LEGISLATION: PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Approval of the 3 -lane conversion of Broadway Avenue — Pines Rd to Sullivan Rd as part of the Broadway Avenue Overlay Project; Discussion of preliminary collision data on Broadway Ave between Pines Road and Sullivan Road on April 29, 2008 and June 16, 2009; Approval of the 2010 -2015 Six Year Transportation Improvement Plan on June 16, 2009, which included the Broadway Avenue Safety Project - Park to Pines; Adoption of the Amended 2010 TIP on April 13, 2010, which included the Broadway Avenue Safety Project - Park to Pines; Info Memo in April 27, 2010 council packets; Admin Report at the May 11, 2010 council meeting. BACKGROUND: In 2006, the City of Spokane Valley applied for a FY2008 grant from the Washington State Transportation Improvement Board (TIB) in the amount of $746,280 for improvements to Broadway Avenue between Park Road and Pines Road. The project will restripe Broadway to a three -lane section with bike lanes. Additionally, sidewalks will be moved or obstructions removed and ramps will be upgraded for ADA compliance. Council has requested a motion to suspend the project. Recent accident data on Broadway Ave between Pines Road and Sullivan Road has shown only a small reduction in the number of accidents after converting to a three lane street. Staff has indicated that the time period for this has been short and other factor may be affecting these results. Studies with more extensive collision data throughout the country have shown significant reduction in accidents based on this type of street conversion. Below is an update on the accident data analysis for that portion of Broadway Avenue between Pines Road and Sullivan Road. The Broadwav Pines to Sullivan collision analysis was updated to include data through Januaiv 2010, which is the latest available from WSDOT. Our comparison of the 4 -lane vs. 3 -lane collision data shows the rate has dropped by 6% since the road was restriped. The overall rate of injury vs. property damage collisions has not changed. hijury accidents still make up 35-36% of the collisions. However, the severity of these injuries has dropped. With the 4 -lane section the Serious + Evident injuries made up 36% of the injury- collisions, and with the 3 -lane that has dropped to 29 %. The dataset used for this analysis has changed slightly since the June 2009 report on Broadway. Starting in 2009 WSDOT no longer includes citizen -filed collision reports in their records. So for consistency purposes, all citizen collision reports from 2003 -2008 were removed from the dataset. Some collisions were added to the dataset as they were found to be miscoded as occui7ing on Evergreen or McDonald when they actually occurred on Broadway. There were a couple of these for both the 4 -lane and 3 -lane periods. After doing some analysis of collision rates city -wide, it was determined that the data for the first six months of 2003 was incomplete, likely due to the City's incorporation and the transition in coding collision reports as City vs. Countv. As a result anv collisions occurring in the first half of 2003 were excluded from the dataset. There are other factors to consider when evaluating this accident data. The 3 -lane analysis period included the two record setting winters of '07 -'08 and '08 -'09. This resulted in a significantly higher percentage of collisions with snow /slush/ice on the road surface. Snow /slush/ice was listed as a factor in only 2% of collisions during the 4 -lane period but was listed for 17% with the 3 -lane. This is consistent with a city -wide analysis that showed higher than average collisions during these periods. There has also been a shift in the type of collisions. Driveway left turn collisions have decreased but year- end collisions have increased. OPTIONS: 1) Suspend the Broadway Avenue Safety Project, 2) Allow the project to continue, or 3) Provide additional direction to staff. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: If it is council's desire to suspend the Broadway Avenue Safety Project, a motion to do this could be worded as "Move to suspend the Broadway Avenue Safety Project." BUDGET /FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Total project estimate is $932,850; 80% ($746,280) to be paid with a state TIB grant, 20% ($186,570) to be paid with local matching funds. Total design estimate is $113,000, with approximately $45,000 spent to date in consultant work and staff time. There are sufficient funds in the Street Capital Projects Fund to cover the local match for this project. STAFF CONTACT: Steve M. Worley, PE — Senior Capital Projects Engineer Neil Kersten, AIA — Public Works Director ATTACHMENTS CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: June 29, 2010 City Manager Sign -off: Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ® new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE : Motion Consideration: Justice Assistance Grant 2010 GOVERNING LEGISLATION: N/A PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: N/A BACKGROUND: The City of Spokane Valley has been allocated $44,231 as part of the Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) Program for the 2010 annual award. These funds are designed to support all components of the criminal justice system. Spokane Valley staff has relied on recommendations of the Spokane Valley Police Chief to identify proposed projects to be funded with the grant. The identified expenditures are as follows. Seven (7) Rugged Notebook Computers $40,705 :uu.1 .I $ 3,526 OPTIONS: 1.) Authorize application for the JAG grant. 2.) Request amendments to the application. 3.) Deny authorization to submit grant. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to authorize the City Manager to submit the application for the 2010 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant. BUDGET /FINANCIAL IMPACTS: $44,231 in grants funds, no match required. STAFF CONTACT: Morgan Koudelka, Senior Administrative Analyst ATTACHMENTS: Grant Narrative Memo Summary JAG Allocation JAG Solicitation S 11707 E Sprague Ave Suite 106 ♦ Spokane Valley WA 99206 509.921.1000 ♦ Fax: 509.921.1008 ♦ cityhatt@spokanevalley.org Memorandum To: Mike Jackson, Acting City Manager Mayor and Members of Council From: Morgan Koudelka, Senior Administrative Analyst Date: June 29, 2010 Re: Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) Program 2010 Application Deadline: June '10,2010. City of Spokane Valley Eligible Amount: $44,231 Match Required: None Award Period: Awards are made in the first fiscal year of the appropriation and may be expended during the following 3 years, for a total grant period of 4 years. Summary: The Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) Program (42 U.S.C. 3751(a)) is the primary provider of federal criminal justice funding to state and local jurisdictions. JAG funds support all components of the criminal justice system, from multijurisdictional drug and gang task forces to crime prevention and domestic violence programs, courts, corrections, treatment, and justice information sharing initiatives. JAG - funded projects may address crime through the provision of services directly to individuals and /or communities and by improving the effectiveness and efficiency of criminal justice systems, processes, and procedures. Purpose Areas: JAG funds may be used for state and local initiatives, technical assistance, training, personnel, equipment, supplies, contractual support, and criminal justice information systems for criminal justice that will improve or enhance such areas as: • Law enforcement programs. • Prosecution and court programs. • Prevention and education programs. • Corrections and community corrections programs. • Drug treatment and enforcement programs. City of Spokane Valley — JAG Grant June 29, 2010 Page 2 of 3 • Planning, evaluation, and technology improvement programs. • Crime victim and witness programs (other than compensation). Note: The authorizing statute for the JAG Program provides that funds are to be used for the purposes above and notes that these purposes include all of the purposes previously authorized under the Edward Byrne Memorial State and Local Assistance Program (Byrne Formula) and the Local Law Enforcement Block Grant Program ( LLEBG). This provision may be useful to applicants in understanding all of the allowable uses under the above purpose areas. For example, relying on this provision, it can be understood that the JAG Purpose Area "Prosecution and court programs" listed above, provides the states and local units of government with the authority to fund defender, judicial, pretrial, and court administration efforts as well as prosecution programs. For a listing of prior Byrne Formula and LLEBG purpose areas, see www.o /BJA /grant /byrnepurpose.html Although these two programs have been eliminated, their prior purpose areas may be useful in appreciating the scope of the JAG purpose areas. Priorities Identified by the Department of Justice: Violent Crime Counterterrorism Indigent Defense Alternatives to Incarceration Smart Policing — Evidence -based and data - driven law enforcement Economic Crimes Offender Re -entry Crimes Against Children Responsibilities: The Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of an eligible unit of local government or other officer designated by the CEO must submit the application for JAG funds. A unit of local government receiving a JAG award will be responsible for the administration of the funds including: distributing the funds; monitoring the award; submitting quarterly financial status (SF -425) and performance metrics reports and annual programmatic reports; and providing ongoing oversight and assistance to any sub recipients of the funds. City of Spokane Valley Expenditures: Proposed expenditures will be identified in the administrative report on June 15. The City expended the 2009 JAG grant on the following items. • Seven (7) Rugged Notebook Computers (go- books) $40,705 • Ammunition $ 3,526 Administrative Funds: A unit of local government may use up to 10 percent of the award, plus any interest accrued, for costs associated with administering JAG funds. Tentative Timeline: June 8: Information item presented to Council with details of award June 15: Administrative Report to Council identifying proposed expenditures June 29: Motion Consideration by Council, authorizing City Manager to apply for JAG grant City- of Spokane Vallee — JAG Grant June 29, 2010 Page 3 of 3 June 30: Apply for grant with Council approval. Prohibited Uses: No JAG funds may be expended outside of JAG purpose areas. Even within these purpose areas, however, JAG funds cannot be used directly or indirectly for security enhancements or equipment for nongovernmental entities not engaged in criminal justice or public safety. Nor may JAG funds be used directly or indirectly to provide for any of the following matters unless BJA certifies that extraordinary and exigent circumstances exist, making them essential to the maintenance of public safety and good order: • Vehicles (excluding police cruisers), vessels (excluding police boats), or aircraft (excluding police helicopters). • Luxury items. • Real estate. • Construction projects (other than penal or correctional institutions). • Any similar matters. Non - Supplanting: Federal funds must be used to supplement existing funds for program activities and cannot replace or supplant nonfederal funds that have been appropriated for the same purpose. Supplanting is prohibited under JAG. Reporting Requirements: Once an award is accepted, award recipients must submit quarterly financial status (SF -425) and annual performance reports through GMS ( https:Hgrants.omp.usdoo.gov ). To assist in fulfilling the Department's responsibilities under the Government Performance and Results Act of 1993 (GPRA), P.L. 103 -62, applicants who receive funding under this solicitation must provide data that measures the results of their work. Additionally, applicants must discuss in their application their methods for collecting data for performance measures. Please refer to "What An Application Must Include" (below), for additional information on applicant responsibilities for collecting and reporting data. Quarterly performance metrics reports must be submitted through BJA's Performance Measurement Tool (PMT) web site: www.biaperformancetools.org JAG 2010 Program Narrative for City of Spokane Valley, WA. JAG 2010 Grant Proposal The City of Spokane Valley respectfully submits this application for the 2010 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG). The City of Spokane Valley will act as fiscal agent for the JAG. The City of Spokane Valley participated in a joint application for 2009 with Spokane County and the City of Spokane due to a disparate funding scenario. This year the City is eligible to apply as a non - disparate single jurisdiction. The City's Grant Accountant and Senior Analyst will be responsible for grant administration details as they relate to acting as fiscal agent, to include disbursement of funds and collecting and submitting financial and performance measure reports of the JAG funding. Expenditures are tracked through individual budget lines for each federal grant received, which keeps federal funding separate. City of Spokane Valley Proiects The Spokane Valley Police Department, on behalf of the City of Spokane Valley, proposes to use their allocation of JAG funds ($44,231) for the grant purpose area of law enforcement programs. This grant funding will be used to purchase seven (7) rugged notebook computers (go- books) at a cost of $40,705 and ammunition at a cost of $3,526. The notebook computers have wireless connections to dispatch and state and federal criminal databases and GPS mapping software. The computers will enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of officers by allowing them review hot spot crime data, scan driver licenses and vehicle registrations to auto -fill reports and citations, referencing policy and procedures, training bulletins, obtain photos of suspects, receive rapid responder information immediately, upload reports to the report system, and utilize intelligence led policing and data. The ammunition will allow officers to receive additional firearm training. Page IofI 2010 WASHINGTON JAG ALLOCATIONS Listed below are all jurisdictions in the state that are eligible for a 2010 JAG grant award, as determined by the JAG formula. If your jurisdiction is listed with another city or county government in a shaded area, you are in a funding disparity. In this case, the units of local government must develop a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) and apply for an award with a single, joint application. Finding your jurisdiction: (1) Disparate jurisdictions are listed in shaded groups below, in alphabetic order by county. (2) Eligible single jurisdictions are listed alphabetically below the shaded, disparate groupings. Joint Formula -based Application State Jurisdiction Name Government Type Individual (Disparate) Amounts (') Award Amounts WA BENTON COUNTY County WA KENNEWICK CITY Municipal $39,632 WA RICHLAND CITY Municipal $15,812 $55,444 WA CHELAN COUNTY County WA WENATCHEE CITY Municipal $14,778 $14,778 WA CLALLAM COUNTY County WA PORT ANGELES CITY Municipal $11,523 $11,523 WA CLARK COUNTY County $41,337 WA VANCOUVER CITY Municipal $95,541 $136,878 WA COWLITZ COUNTY County WA KELSO CITY Municipal $11,058 WA LONGVIEW CITY Municipal $22,219 $33,277 WA FRANKLIN COUNTY County WA PASCO CITY Municipal $24,544 $24,544 WA KING COUNTY County $97,711 WA SEATTLE CITY Municipal $582,135 $679,846 WA LEWIS COUNTY County MM WA CENTRALIA CITY Municipal $14,675 $14,675 WA PIERCE COUNTY County $178,681 WA TACOMA CITY Municipal $317,782 $496,463 WA SPOKANE COUNTY County $43,043 WA SPOKANE CITY Municipal $200,022 $243,065 WA WALLA WALLA COUNTY County WA WALLA WALLA CITY Municipal $19,532 $19,532 WA YAKIMA COUNTY County $18,809 WA YAKIMA CITY Municipal $74,356 $93,165 WA AUBURN CITY Municipal $42,784 WA BELLEVUE CITY Municipal $25,319 WA BELLINGHAM CITY Municipal $29,143 WA BREMERTON CITY Municipal $51,155 WA BURIEN CITY Municipal $28,885 WA DES MOINES CITY Municipal $17,052 WA EVERETT CITY Municipal $90,426 WA FEDERAL WAY CITY Municipal $48,623 WA GRANT COUNTY County $12,298 WA KENT CITY Municipal $84,277 WA KIRKLAND CITY Municipal $13,176 WA KITSAP COUNTY County $92,803 WA LACEY CITY Municipal $14,313 WA LAKEWOOD CITY Municipal $79,730 WA LYNNWOOD CITY Municipal $19,429 WA MARYSVILLE CITY Municipal $13,176 WA MASON COUNTY County $19,635 WA MOSES LAKE CITY Municipal $13,125 WA MOUNT VERNON CITY Municipal $12,608 WA OLYMPIA CITY Municipal $21,495 WA PORT ORCHARD CITY Municipal $10,334 WA PUYALLUP CITY Municipal $20,307 WA REDMOND CITY Municipal $10,696 WA RENTON CITY Municipal $42,164 WA SEATAC CITY Municipal $23,511 WA SHORELINE CITY Municipal $18,240 WA SKAGIT COUNTY County $12,763 WA SNOHOMISH COUNTY County $92,338 WA SPOKANE VALLEY CITY Municipal $44,231 WA THURSTON COUNTY County $44,076 WA TUKWILA CITY Municipal $26,766 WA UNIVERSITY PLACE CITY Municipal $14,210 WA WHATCOM COUNTY County $21,340 Local total $2,933,618 State award $5,497,422 Grand total for Washington $8,431,040 Counties that have an asterisk (*) under the "Formula -Based Individual Amounts" column did not submit the level of violent crime data to qualify for a direct award from BJA, but are in the disparate grouping indicated by the shaded area. The JAG legislation requires these counties to remain a partner with the local jurisdictions receiving funds and must be a signatory on the required Memorandum of Understanding (MOU). A sample MOU is provided online at: http://www.omp.usdom.gov/BJA/grant/maqlO/10JAGMOU.Pdf 'Formula -Based Individual Amounts - Disparate jurisdictions do not need to abide by the listed individual amounts which are provided for information only. Jurisdictions in a funding disparity are responsible for determining individual allocations within the Joint Application Award Amount and for documenting individual allocations in the MOU. Additional JAG Frequently Asked Questions can be found on the BJA JAG web page at: http:llwww.oip.usdom.gov /BJA /grant /mag.htmi U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Bureau ofAsticeAssistance OMB No. 1121 -0329 The U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs' (OJP) Bureau of Justice Assistance (BJA) is pleased to announce that it is seeking applications for funding under the Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) Program. This program furthers the Department's mission by assisting state, local, and tribal efforts to prevent or reduce crime and violence. Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) Program FY 2010 Local Solicitation Eligibility Applicants are limited to units of local government appearing on the FY 2010 JAG Allocations List. To view this list, go to www.o BJA /grant /10iagallocations.html For JAG program purposes, a unit of local government is: a town, township, village, parish, city, county, borough, or other general purpose political subdivision of a state; or, it may also be a federally recognized Indian tribe that performs law enforcement functions (as determined by the Secretary of the Interior and published in the Federal Register Otherwise a unit of local government may be any law enforcement district or judicial enforcement district established under applicable state law with authority to independently establish a budget and impose taxes. In Louisiana, a unit of local government means a district attorney or parish sheriff. In the District of Columbia or any United States Trust Territory, a unit of local government is any agency of the District of Columbia or federal government performing law enforcement functions for the District of Columbia or Trust Territories of the United States. Deadline This application must be submitted through OJP's Grants Management System (GMS) Registration with OJP's Grant Management System (GMS) is required prior to application submission. (See "How to Apply," page 6.) All applications are due by 8:00 p.m. eastern time on June 30, 2010 (See "Deadlines: Registration and Application," page 1.) Contact Information For technical assistance with submitting the application, contact the Grants Management System Support Hotline at 1- 888 - 549 -9901, option 3, or via e -mail to GMS. HelpDesk(o�usdoi.gov Note: The GMS Support Hotline hours of operation are Monday— Friday from 6:00 a.m. to 12 midnight eastern time, except federal holidays. For assistance with the requirements of this solicitation, contact your State Policy Advisor: www.o /BJA /resource /ProgramsOffice.pdf Release date: April 26, 2010 CONTENTS Overview Deadlines: Registration and Application Eligibility JAG Program— Specific Information How to Apply What an Application Must Include: Standard Form 424 Program Narrative Budget and Budget Narrative Review Narrative Abstract Review Process Additional Requirements Application Checklist L 7 ! E 10 OMB No. 1121 -0329 Approval expires 02/28/13 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) Program CFDA #16.738 Overview The Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) Program (42 U.S.C. 3751(a)) is the primary provider of federal criminal justice funding to state and local jurisdictions. JAG funds support all components of the criminal justice system, from multijurisdictional drug and gang task forces to crime prevention and domestic violence programs, courts, corrections, treatment, and justice information sharing initiatives. JAG - funded projects may address crime through the provision of services directly to individuals and /or communities and by improving the effectiveness and efficiency of criminal justice systems, processes, and procedures. Deadlines: Registration and Application Registration is required prior to submission. The deadline to register in GMS is 8:00 p.m. eastern time on June 30, 2010 and the deadline for applying for funding under this announcement is 8:00 p.m. eastern time on June 30, 2010. Please see the "How to Apply" section, page 6, for more details. Eligibility Please refer to the cover page of this solicitation for eligibility under this program JAG Program— Specific Information All awards are subject to the availability of appropriated funds and any modifications or additional requirements that may be imposed by law. Established to streamline justice funding and grant administration, the JAG Program allows states, tribes, and local governments to support a broad range of activities to prevent and control crime based on their own local needs and conditions. JAG blends the previous Byrne Formula and Local Law Enforcement Block Grant (LLEBG) Programs to provide agencies with the flexibility to prioritize and place justice funds where they are needed most. Formula The Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS) calculates, for each state and territory, a minimum base allocation which, based on the Congressionally mandated JAG formula, can be enhanced by (1) the state's share of the national population, and (2) the state's share of the country's Part 1 violent crime statistics. Once the state funding is calculated, 60 percent of the allocation is awarded to the state and 40 percent to eligible units of local government (please note that the territories and District of Columbia are exempt from this part of the formula). Eligible state /territory recipients are entitled to the previously mentioned 60 percent state allocation plus any funds designated for the state's units of local government whose direct allocation would be less than $10,000. Funds from these "less than $10,000 jurisdictions" are added to the state allocation and must be distributed by the state to state police departments OMB No. 1121 -0329 1 Approval expires 02/28/13 that provide criminal justice services to units of local government and units of local government that were not eligible for a direct award of $10,000 or more. In addition, the formula then calculates direct allocations for local governments within each state, based on their share of the total violent crime reported within the state. Local governments entitled to at least $10,000 awards may apply directly to BJA for local JAG grants. States also have a variable percentage of the allocation that is required to be `passed through" to units of local government. This amount, also calculated by BJS, is based on each state's crime expenditures. Updated Variable Pass - through percentages (VPT), which State Administering Agencies (SAA) are required to use in the administration of Fiscal Year 2010 JAG awards, can be found at: www.omp.usdoo.gov /BJA /grant /mag10 /10JAGvpt.pdf Award Amount Eligible award amounts under JAG are posted annually to BJA's JAG web page: www.o /BJA /grant /mag.html Purpose Areas JAG funds may be used for state and local initiatives, technical assistance, training, personnel, equipment, supplies, contractual support, and criminal justice information systems for criminal justice that will improve or enhance such areas as: • Law enforcement programs. • Prosecution and court programs. • Prevention and education programs. • Corrections and community corrections programs. • Drug treatment and enforcement programs. • Planning, evaluation, and technology improvement programs. • Crime victim and witness programs (other than compensation). Note: The authorizing statute for the JAG Program provides that funds are to be used for the purposes above and notes that these purposes include all of the purposes previously authorized under the Edward Byrne Memorial State and Local Assistance Program (Byrne Formula) and the Local Law Enforcement Block Grant Program ( LLEBG). This provision may be useful to applicants in understanding all of the allowable uses under the above purpose areas. For example, relying on this provision, it can be understood that the JAG Purpose Area "Prosecution and court programs" listed above, provides the states and local units of government with the authority to fund defender, judicial, pretrial, and court administration efforts as well as prosecution programs. For a listing of prior Byrne Formula and LLEBG purpose areas, see www.o /BJA /grant /byrnepurpose.html Although these two programs have been eliminated, their prior purpose areas may be useful in appreciating the scope of the JAG purpose areas. Priorities BJA recognizes that the downturn in the economy has resulted in significant pressures on state and local criminal justice systems. In these challenging times, all of DOJ, and especially OJP and BJA, wish to ensure that local JAG recipients are aware of several areas of national focus and priority for DOJ that may be of help in maximizing the effectiveness of the Byrne /JAG funding at the state and local level. As an overall framework for success, we encourage comprehensive justice planning, bringing all of the system stakeholders together, including law enforcement, courts, prosecutors, defenders, OMB No. 1121 -0329 Approval expires 02/28/13 corrections officials, and other stakeholders to create a comprehensive and strategic justice plan to ensure coordination and a more effective justice system. As a part of this strategic planning process, we strongly encourage state and local planners to consider programs that are evidence -based and have been proven effective; in a difficult budgetary climate, it is critical that dollars are spent on programs whose effectiveness is proven However, we recognize that state and local programs can also be wonderful laboratories for innovative programs that can be models for other states and localities addressing difficult problems. BJA has made resources available to state administering agencies and others to provide training and technical assistance in identifying and using evidence -based practices as the outcome of a comprehensive and strategic justice plan in the state or local community. In addition to these overarching considerations, and in addition to our longstanding and unwavering commitment to keeping violent crime at its lowest level in decades, the following priorities represent key areas where we will be focusing nationally and invite each state to join us in addressing these challenges as a part of our Justice Assistance Grants partnership. A key priority for the Department of Justice and, indeed, the entire Administration, is effective counterterrorism and terrorism prevention programs. We recognize that state and local law enforcement are critical partners in detecting, identifying, preventing, and disrupting acts of violence against the United States by both domestic and international extremist organizations. Preventing terrorism remains the first goal of the Department of Justice's strategic plan and remains a priority for BJA. Another key priority area is ensuring that justice is truly done in the criminal justice system —the Attorney General has consistently stressed that the crisis in indigent defense reform is a serious concern of his, a concern which is shared by OJP and BJA. As a former prosecutor and judge, however, the Attorney General is also acutely aware that without adequate funding for the courts, prosecution, problem - solving courts, and other innovative, cost - saving alternatives to incarceration, true justice cannot be achieved. As important as a well- functioning court system is "Smart Policing " — evidence -based and data - driven law enforcement efforts that allow agencies to maximize their resources and more efficiently target emerging and chronic crime problems, hopefully preventing crimes before they occur and ultimately lessening the burden on the courts and the justice system overall. As our economy shows signs of recovery, it is essential that we not allow this progress to be thwarted by economic crime, including mortgage fraud, financial crimes, fraud, and intellectual property crimes that threaten our economic growth and stability. In order to lessen the burden on what has been described as an overreliance on incarceration, it is essential that those who have served time can transition back into the community and into crime -free pro - social lives. To do this, we will emphasize smart and effective approaches to offender reentry and will support statewide and local efforts in justice reinvestment, which reduces costly spending on incarceration and reinvests a portion of the savings into other areas of the justice system without sacrificing accountability. Last, but certainly not least, we must ensure that, in the context of our continued focus on addressing violent crime, children who are exposed to violence are responded to effectively so that these experiences do not risk the futures of these children and do not fuel the cycle of violence. OMB No. 1121 -0329 3 Approval expires 02/28/13 These priorities and others will be the focus of our efforts during FY 2010, and we invite you as a partner and grantee to join us in our efforts to address these critical issues. Responsibilities The Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of an eligible unit of local government or other officer designated by the CEO must submit the application for JAG funds. A unit of local government receiving a JAG award will be responsible for the administration of the funds including: distributing the funds; monitoring the award; submitting quarterly financial status (SF -425) and performance metrics reports and annual programmatic reports; and providing ongoing oversight and assistance to any subrecipients of the funds. Administrative Funds A unit of local government may use up to 10 percent of the award, plus any interest accrued, for costs associated with administering JAG funds. Disparate Certification A disparate allocation occurs when a city or municipality is allocated one - and - one -half times (150 percent) more than the county, while the county bears more than 50 percent of the costs associated with prosecution or incarceration of the municipality's Part 1 violent crimes. A disparate allocation also occurs when multiple cities or municipalities are collectively allocated four times (400 percent) more than the county, and the county bears more than 50 percent of the collective costs associated with prosecution or incarceration of each municipality's Part 1 violent crimes. * Jurisdictions certified as disparate must identify a fiscal agent that will submit a joint application for the aggregate eligible allocation to all disparate municipalities. The joint application must determine and specify the award distribution to each unit of local government and the purposes for which the funds will be used. When beginning the JAG application process, a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) that identifies which jurisdiction will serve as the applicant /fiscal agent for joint funds, must be completed, and signed by the Authorized Representative for each participating jurisdiction. The signed MOU should be attached to the application. For a sample MOU, go to www.o /BJA /grant /iag10 /10JAGMOU.pdf Failure to submit a singed MOU may result in the attachment of a withholding special condition at the time of award, preventing the draw -down of funds until the required information is submitted. Governing Body Review The applicant agency (fiscal agent in disparate situations) must make the grant application available for review by the governing body (or to the organization designated by the governing body) not fewer than 30 days before the application is submitted to BJA. Failure to submit a review narrative including the required governing body notification information may result in the attachment of a withholding special condition at the time of award, preventing the drawdown of funds until the required information is submitted. Public Comment The applicant agency (the fiscal agent in disparate situations) must include a statement that the application was made public and that, to the extent of applicable law or established procedure, an opportunity to comment was provided to citizens and to neighborhood or community -based organizations. Failure to submit a review narrative including the required public comment OMB No. 1121 -0329 Approval expires 02/28/13 information may result in the attachment of a withholding special condition at the time of award, preventing the drawdown of funds until the required information is submitted. Supplanting Federal funds must be used to supplement existing funds for program activities and cannot replace or supplant nonfederal funds that have been appropriated for the same purpose. Supplanting is prohibited under JAG. Length of Awards Awards are made in the first fiscal year of the appropriation and may be expended during the following 3 years, for a total grant period of 4 years. Extensions beyond this period may be made on a case -by -case basis at the discretion of the Director of BJA and must be requested via the Grants Management System (GMS) no less than 30 days prior to the grant end date. Trust Fund Award recipients may drawdown JAG funds in advance. To do so, a trust fund must be established in which to deposit the funds. The trust fund may or may not be an interest - bearing account. If subrecipients draw down JAG funds in advance, they also must establish a trust fund in which to deposit funds. Prohibited Uses No JAG funds may be expended outside of JAG purpose areas. Even within these purpose areas, however, JAG funds cannot be used directly or indirectly for security enhancements or equipment for nongovernmental entities not engaged in criminal justice or public safety. Nor may JAG funds be used directly or indirectly to provide for any of the following matters unless BJA certifies that extraordinary and exigent circumstances exist, making them essential to the maintenance of public safety and good order: • Vehicles (excluding police cruisers), vessels (excluding police boats), or aircraft (excluding police helicopters). • Luxury items. • Real estate. • Construction projects (other than penal or correctional institutions). • Any similar matters. Reporting Requirements Once an award is accepted, award recipients must submit quarterly financial status (SF -425) and annual performance reports through GMS ( https: / /grants.oip.usdoi.gov To assist in fulfilling the Department's responsibilities under the Government Performance and Results Act of 1993 (GPRA), P.L. 103 -62, applicants who receive funding under this solicitation must provide data that measures the results of their work. Additionally, applicants must discuss in their application their methods for collecting data for performance measures. Please refer to "What An Application Must Include" (below), for additional information on applicant responsibilities for collecting and reporting data. Quarterly performance metrics reports must be submitted through BJA's Performance Measurement Tool (PMT) web site: www.bmaperformancetools.org OMB No. 1121 -0329 Approval expires 02/28/13 Budget Information Match Requirement While match is not required with the JAG Program, match can be used as an effective strategy for states and units of local government to expand justice funds and build buy -in for local criminal justice initiatives. How to Apply Applications will be submitted through OJP's Grants Management System ( GMS is a web - based, data - driven computer application that provides cradle to grave support for the application, award, and management of grants at OJP. Applicants should begin the process immediately to meet the GMS registration deadline, especially if this is the first time they have used the system. Complete instructions on how to register and submit an application in GMS can be found at www.omp.usdoo.gov /gmscbt / . If you experience technical difficulties at any point during this process, please email the GMS.HeIpDesk(o�usdoi.gov or call 1- 888 - 549 -9901 (option 3), Monday- Friday from 6:00 a.m. to 12 midnight eastern time, except federal holidays. The Office of Justice Programs highly recommends starting the registration process as early as possible to prevent delays in the application submission by the specified deadline. All applicants are required to complete the following six steps, before an application can be sub mitted through GMS: Acquire a DUNS (Data Universal Numbering System) Number. A DUNS number is required to submit an application in GMS. The Office of Management and Budget requires that all businesses and nonprofit applicants for Federal funds include a DUNS number in their application for a new award or renewal of an existing award. A DUNS number is a unique nine -digit sequence recognized as the universal standard for identifying and keeping track of entities receiving Federal funds. The identifier is used for tracking purposes and to validate address and point of contact information for federal assistance applicants, recipients, and sub - recipients. The DUNS number will be used throughout the grant life cycle. Obtaining a DUNS number is a free, one -time activity. Obtain a DUNS number by calling 1- 866 - 705 -5711 or by applying online at www.dunandbradstreet.com Individuals are exempt from this requirement. 2. Acquire or Renew Registration with the Central Contractor Registration (CCR) Database. CCR registration is required to receive funding. OJP requires that all applicants (other than individuals) for federal financial assistance maintain current registrations in the CCR database. The CCR database is the repository for standard information about federal financial assistance applicants, recipients, and sub - recipients. Organizations that have previously submitted applications via Grants.gov are already registered with CCR, as it is a requirement for Grants.gov registration. If you have previously registered with CCR, your registration must be updated or renewed at least once per year to maintain an active status. Information about CCR registration procedures can be accessed at www.ccr.gov 3. Acquire a GMS Username and Password. If you are a new user, please create a GMS profile by selecting the first time user link under the sign -in box of the GMS home page. For more information on how to register in GMS, go to www.o /qmscbt / . 4. Search for the Funding Opportunity on GMS. After you login to GMS or complete your GMS profile for your username and password, go to the Funding Opportunities link on the OMB No. 1121 -0329 Approval expires 02/28/13 left hand side of the page. Please select BJA and the Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) Program —Local Solicitation. 5. Select the Apply Online Button Associated with the Solicitation Title. The search results from step 4 will display the solicitation title along with the Registration and Application Deadlines for this funding opportunity. Please select the Apply Online button in the Action Column to create an application in the system. 6. Submit an Application Consistent with this Solicitation by Following the Directions in GMS. Once the application is completed and submitted, GMS will display a confirmation screen stating your submission was successful. Important: You are urged to submit your application at least 72 hours prior to the application deadline. Note: OJP's Grants Management System (GMS) does not accept executable file types as application attachments These disallowed file types include, but are not limited to, the following extensions: ".com," ".bat," ".exe," ".vbs," ".cfg," ".dat," ".db," ".dbf," "All," ".ini," ".log," ".ora," ".sys," and ".zip." Experiencing Unforeseen GMS Technical Issues If you experience unforeseen GMS technical issues beyond your control which prevent you from submitting your application by the deadline, you should immediately contact the GMS Help Desk at 1- 888 - 549 -9901, option 3 to report the difficulties and obtain a GMS Help Desk Tracking number. Additionally, within 24 hours after the deadline you must contact BJA staff and request approval to submit your application. At that time, BJA staff will require you to email the complete grant application, your DUNS number, and provide a GMS Help Desk tracking number(s). After the program office reviews all of the information submitted, and validates with the GMS Helpdesk the technical issues you reported, OJP will contact you to either approve or deny your request to submit a late application. If the technical issues you reported cannot be validated, your late application will not be accepted. The following conditions are not valid reasons to permit late submissions: (1) failure to begin the registration process and apply for a DUNS number and /or complete the CCR registration in sufficient time; (2) failure to follow GMS instructions on how to register and apply as posted on its website; (3) failure to follow all of the instructions in the OJP solicitation; and (4) technical issues experienced with the applicant's computer or information technology (IT) environment. Notifications regarding known technical problems with GMS are posted on the OJP funding web page, www.omp.usdom.gov /funding /solicitations.htm What an Application Must Include This section describes what an application is expected to include and sets out a number of elements. Applicants should anticipate that failure to submit an application that contains all of the specified elements may negatively affect the review of the application and, should a decision nevertheless be made to make an award, may result in the inclusion of special conditions that preclude access to or use of award funds pending satisfaction of the conditions. OJP strongly recommends use of appropriately descriptive file names (e.g., "Program Narrative," "Budget and Budget Narrative," "Memoranda of Understanding," etc.) for all required attachments. OMB No. 1121 -0329 Approval expires 02/28/13 Standard Form 424 Please see www07.grants.gov /assets /SF4241nstructions.pdf for instructions on how to complete your SF -424. Program Narrative (Attachment 1) Applicants must submit a program narrative that generally describes the proposed program activities for the four year grant period. The narrative must outline the type of programs to be funded by the JAG award and provide a brief analysis of the need for the programs. Narratives must also identify anticipated coordination efforts involving JAG and related justice funds. Certified disparate jurisdictions submitting a joint application must specify the funding distribution to each disparate unit of local government and the purposes for which the funds will be used. Failure to submit an appropriate program narrative may result in the attachment of a withholding special condition at the time of award, preventing the drawdown of funds until the required information is submitted. Budget and Budget Narrative (Attachment 2) Applicants must submit a budget and budget narrative outlining how JAG funds, including administrative funds if applicable, will be used to support and implement the program. This narrative should include a full breakdown of administrative costs, as well as an overview of how funds will be allocated across approved JAG purpose areas. Applicants should utilize the following approved budget categories to label the requested expenditures: Personnel, Fringe Benefits, Travel, Equipment, Supplies, Consultants /Contracts, and an Other category. For informational purposes only, a sample budget form may be found at www.o /funding /forms /budget detail.pdf Failure to submit an appropriate budget and budget narrative may result in the attachment of a withholding special condition at the time of award, preventing the drawdown of funds until the required information is submitted. Review Narrative (Attachment 3) Applicants must submit information documenting that the date the JAG application was made available for review to the governing body, or to an organization designated by that governing body, on a date not less than 30 days before the application was submitted to BJA. The attachment must also specify that an opportunity to comment was provided to citizens to the extent applicable law or established procedures make such opportunity available. Failure to submit an appropriate review narrative may result in the attachment of a withholding special condition at the time of award, preventing the drawdown of funds until the required information is submitted. Abstract (Attachment 4) Applicants are requested to provide an abstract that includes the applicant's name, title of the project, goals of the project, and a description of the strategies to be used. The abstract must not exceed a half -page, or 400 -500 words. Review Process OJP is committed to ensuring a fair and open process for awarding grants. The Bureau of Justice Assistance reviews the application to make sure that the information presented is reasonable, understandable, measurable, and achievable, as well as consistent with the solicitation. OMB No. 1121 -0329 Approval expires 02/28/13 Absent explicit statutory authorization or written delegation of authority to the contrary, all final grant award decisions will be made by the Assistant Attorney General (AAG). Additional Requirements Applicants selected for awards must agree to comply with additional legal requirements upon acceptance of an award. We strongly encourage you to review the information pertaining to these additional requirements prior to submitting your application. Additional information for each can be found at www.omp.usdoo.gov /funding /other reguirements.htm • Civil Rights Compliance • Faith -Based and Other Community Organizations • Confidentiality and Human Subjects Protection (if applicable) • Anti - Lobbying Act • Financial and Government Audit Requirements • National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) (if applicable) • DOJ Information Technology Standards (if applicable) • Single Point of Contact Review • Nonsupplanting of State or Local Funds • Criminal Penalty for False Statements • Compliance with Office of Justice Programs Financial Guide • Suspension or Termination of Funding • Nonprofit Organizations • For - Profit Organizations • Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA) • Rights in Intellectual Property • Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) of 2006 • Awards in excess of $5,000,000 — federal taxes certification requirement OMB No. 1121 -0329 9 Approval expires 02/28/13 Application Checklist FY 2010 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) Program: Local Solicitation The application checklist has been created to aid you in developing your application. Eligibility Requirement: The jurisdiction listed as the legal name on the application corresponds with the eligible jurisdiction listed on BJA's JAG web page The federal amount requested is within the allowable limit of the FY 2010 JAG Allocations List as listed on BJA's JAG web page The Application Components: Program Narrative Budget and Budget Narrative Review Narrative (the date the JAG application was made available to the governing body for review and that it was provided to the public for comment) Abstract Memorandum of Understanding (MOU), if in a funding disparity Program Narrative Format: Double- spaced 12 -point standard font Not less than 1" margins Abstract Format: 12 -point standard font Not less than 1" margins '/2 page or less Other: Standard 424 Form DUNS Number CCR Registration OMB No. 1121 -0329 10 Approval expires 02/28/13 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: June 29, 2010 City Manager Sign -off: Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ® admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Cattlemen of Spokane County GOVERNING LEGISLATION: PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: BACKGROUND: Cindy Marshall, of the Cattlemen of Spokane County, informs us they have been working with the Sheriff's Commercial Vehicle Department, specifically Corporal Sola. Their efforts have been to bring attention to the large influx of Canadian Cattle Trucks that daily enter our state from Idaho, and the impact it has on their Cattle Industry, businesses and especially the secondary roads as the Canadian Cattle trucks are bypassing the Interstate. She informs us they have been before the Legislature, the Spokane County Commissioners, and the Department of Traffic for the City of Spokane Valley (March 19, 2010). OPTIONS: RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: BUDGET /FINANCIAL IMPACTS: STAFF CONTACT: ATTACHMENTS: PowerPoint presentation Spokesman Review November 9, 2009 Article: "Big rigs' heavy loads draw hefty citations." Big Figs' heavy loads draw hefty citations - Spokesman.com - Nov. 9, 2009 THE SPOKE AN` E "'w Page 1 of 3 November 9, 2009 Big rigs' heavy loads draw hefty citations Mike Prager mikep @spokesman.com, (509) 459 -5454 Tags: Cpl. Bob Sola Overweight vehicles Spokane sheriff Cpl. Bob Sola of the Spokane County Sheriff's Office stands outside his vehicle, which carries scales for commercial vehicles. Sola issued a $14,000 ticket last week for an overweight load. Spokane sheriff's Cpl. Bob Sola was pretty sure the truck he spotted crossing the Greene Street Bridge in east Spokane last Monday was overloaded. He was surprised at just how overloaded. After stopping the driver and setting up his portable scales, he discovered the truck and low -boy trailer were 57,600 pounds over the gross weight allowed. The fine: $14,000. While that may sound like a lot of weight and money, law officers last week said they have been issuing fines of several thousand dollars to truckers or their companies on a regular basis. Officials are concerned about the cumulative damage the overweight trucks are causing to roads and bridges in the Spokane region, and both Spokane police and county sheriff's deputies have been assigned to weight- safety patrols on local streets and roads. The problem, officers said, is most commonly found in the construction industry. On Thursday, a truck from Sandpoint carrying a crane to the north Spokane freeway project was stopped by a city officer and issued a $6,800 overweight citation, The load was 32,600 pounds over. Five other citations were issued by the same officer on Thursday, Sola said. On Friday, a Washington State Patrol trooper pulled over a truck for being overweight and discovered that the driver was under the influence of intoxicants, officers said. http: / /www.spokesman. com/stories /2009 /nov /09/big- rigs - heavy - loads- draw -hefty- citation... 06/21/2010 Big rigs' heavy loads draw hefty citations - Spokesman. com - Nov. 9, 2009 Page 2 of 3 Last Monday's incident in east Spokane involved a low -boy carrying an excavator belonging to Eller Corp., a contractor based at Newman Lake. The truck scaled out at 163,100 pounds, even though the Greene Street Bridge has a 72,000 -pound weight restriction, Sola said, Officers did not issue a ticket for the bridge violation, which could have added another $400 to the fine. They also did not add up weight violations for each of the individual tires or axle -tire pairs, which could have brought the fine to as much as double the $14,000, he said. A spokeswoman at the Eller Corp. office said it was not a good day for the crew, A fill -in driver was behind the wheel, she said. Sala said the truck crew could have reduced its load by not carrying so much equipment at one time. The vehicle had a county permit to carry extra weight, but the violation nullified the permit. Overweight trucks are a major cause of road deterioration, said Howard Hamby, pavement manager for Spokane County. He said the weight can break or deform pavement, particularly on older roads with shallow roadbeds. "You get them on a county road, and these things absolutely destroy it," he said. Damaged pavement is a safety hazard. "Our mission is not to write tickets. Our mission is to gain compliance," Sola said. Five Mile project at critical stage It's coming down to the wire for a major widening of Five Mile Road west of Austin Road in northwest Spokane. Paving on the $6.1 million project began Thursday and caused a temporary closure from Ash to Wedgewood streets. Base paving on the rest of the project is slated for completion next Monday. If crews run out of time to complete the paving this fall, the newly widened street will be opened to traffic during the off - season until crews can return to complete the job in the spring, a city spokeswoman said last week. http: / /www.spokesman.com /stories /2009 /nov /09/big -rigs- heavy - loads- draw - hefty - citation... 06/21/2010 Big rigs' heavy loads draw hefty citations - Spokesman.com - Nov. 9, 2009 Page 3 of 3 Leaf cleanup under way Leaf cleanup has started in Spokane Valley, where crews are working in neighborhoods that are lined with trees, a spokeswoman said. Spokane crews started clearing leaves in northwest Spokane last week. Kettle Falls focuses on pedestrians Kettle Falls is getting a new look along U.S. Highway 395. The city is the lead agency to improve pedestrian safety by constructing a separated sidewalk, curb and stormwater infiltration area on the south side of the highway from the eastern city limits to Juniper Street, according to Al Gilson of the state Department of Transportation. Get more news and information at Spokesman.coi http: / /www.spokesman.comistoz iesl2009lnovIO91big- rigs - heavy - loads- draw -hefty- citation... 06/21/2010 CANADIAN CATTLE TRUCKS *"� 9 to ik"Isfoo by 9 taken from Hwy Hwy 290 and on Spokane Valley 77 E 32 Ave Mica Twin 1 i fvo l �. r` P 3 I y= How elftawwn 41 Coeur D'Alene Air Terminal Hausa � Haycrop Hayder ,y IN Hoyden Ave I � 95 ,. du 5 C Grand 0 z UL Junction, Ga e Rost Falls 5 $ Way It State L i ne McG uire oefter_ Treniwood E U'.rie Ye} Ave E bent Ave Pleasant � C Austin E Fucid Ave C1 Ims view d' pokane Valley Greenacres Green Acres r, E Sprague Ave Verada le 77 E 32 Ave Mica Twin VV Hayden Ave G fl a W Harman lave - �r m z � c ;D z 2 4 � ro N Hui, Prarte Rd w Prarroe Ave c a LM' Prarr,e •'• '5 Z W Polo Green Ave VJ G+ar*ge Ave "At GrSnv4e Ave Golf C a X a R6 Z - 0 0 29Q w� a n f a x 9D o W PoleWm Ave ° W Pole ne Avt c � K z 10 n c �I 4, a A Post Falls W Seft way w Sett" Way E 7 Th Ave z : `:�►� Ave State L1t1'E O i YK h ��} $ @gmluw Guiah Rd E 9Igekrw CiAn fed N djL E Franc% Rai � , V'rFt�Cmdrr ltr PRO P 'I�`eif d FlUtla rl 'St!itl ri nS E Vv4kldrPrAYr Trentwmd Tr QD E !V4oUj+ y A E uperar t)r E Tr-M A*9 7 �M 6j11r J B erw l ��P Pelts FIeW erµ Orcl`iard Molhs O&I pokane Park ry GtrreP rry per► �� Park �E [ p "A Walle �' � ��, I�rbe. �ce rt L� � ` E w1von A,* E Miersw, , Av D } k�I E p SMti4'4Ve S LiYfle E O raaawwAw' - E 1 " vrsllcy Green Arfes E2s1 'CEf4mak LSpreg Dmman CL E Sprague Ave mh Ave E y ZA Cxf�hm.-m HIII ;, E " AVE .Mvwr .il Mr± *a E r3 V F3d.aIS ' m E W Am C)�"Mt mly E 141h Av® E A BlFL Rae Ir7C:rrftt w ++CI7hC5 E Tilt � E 24tri LM E 29Lh !fie ,� Glem5e ° E. 3, Ave m F. C. 37tri . J44m LO Lo -M ! pr4� O '4rf+G er 4 A A E 57th A" ■ 450,000 - 500,000 cattle were --+ imported in 2009. ■ There was a 20% increas( the number of cattle impor the first quarter of 2010. ■ 9,000 - 9,500 trucks a year travel on our secondary roads in Spokane Valley. ■ On average, a total of 40 -70 Canadia cattle trucks travel Hwv 290 every weekday, byp assing the Port of Entry • They never stop in the City of Sp Valley. CATTLE TRUCK ON "'I A 7X7 ' r% f1 INTERSECTION AT Hv\lY 290 � & P 1 IN mzn km vv Y 27) i• i i 46 f 7• CATTLE TRUCK ON � a. PINES (Hv\/Y 27) 11 __ 1 0 m 6 0 LOXW a • v T- - r. w P, pr�- � 'I 04 ■The legal weight limit is 105,500 lbs. ■ The trucks damage 4 axel rear trailers r known to be loaded as 112,000 lbs. ■ These trucks contril our state or local ec THREE CORNERS, IDAHO Scale has been known to be closed during normal working hours , 10:00 am on a Monday ■ ■ 'MI RIMMIN 61 51 1 O I Me MI Arrive in the Spokane area between 12pm & 2 pm. ■ Arrive in Pasco, & 6pm. ■ WA or Toppenish, WA between 3pn Cattle are unloaded and drivers take a dinner break for usually 2 to 3 hours. ■ Drivers wash out their trucks and leave the man for the state of WA to take care of and head bac toward Spokane. ■ Arrive in Spokane between 4am & 6am. ■ By the time they return to Spokane, most of the drivers have loaaed � beyond the 14 hour log book rule. ■ By bypassing the Port of temptation for violations enhanced. Entry, the ■ A direct quote from Lt. Jones, Washington State DOT: LE "THESE TRUGKSAND DRIVERS AVOID THE WASHINGTON STATE PORT OFENTRYSO EQ UIPMENT Lt BOOKS, WEIGHTS OF TRUCKS AN PAPER WORKAS TO CATTLE Ol BOARD CAN NOT BE GHE'CKED, ~®crc -BER 8, 2008 COUNTY AND CITY � SOLUTIONS ■ ROAD RESTRICTIONS -- LOCAL DELIVERY ONLY ROAD RESTRIGTIC LOCAL ORDNANCE -- ALL OUT OF STATE LIVESTOCK COMING FROM IDAHO MUST REPORT TO THE NEW MILLION DOLLAR PORT OF ENTRY STATE SOLUTIONS *" � ■ PURSUE LEGISLATION TO BRING WASHINGTON UP TO PAR WITH REPORT TO SCALE LAWS AS IN SURROUNDING STATES ■ PURSUE LIVESTOCK REPORT TO SCALE LEGISLATION FOR HEALTI- VACCINATION AND WEIGHT VIOLATIONS SOLUTIONS ■ BY MANDATING REPORT TO SCALE LAWS, WE CAN VERIFY LOGBOOK COMPLIANCE AND LIMIT FATIGUED DRIVERS EQUIPMENT VIOLATIONS CANE CAUGHT EARLY AND PREVENT COLLISIONS CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: June 29, 2010 City Manager Sign -off: Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ® admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE : Pavement Requirements: memo responding to citizen request to eliminate paving requirement in the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC). GOVERNING LEGISLATION: See attached handout. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: N/A BACKGROUND: Daniel Robbins, owner of Evergreen State Towing provided citizen comment at the June 8 council meeting regarding his proposed business location. The property is zoned correctly for a towing operation but the SVMC would require that the property be paved. He would like to see that requirement be eliminated. The City Council requested information regarding the code requirement and if it could be changed. City staff have been working on a handout to explain the reasons for paving parking and storage lots and driveways. Although the handout is in draft form it provides the technical reasons for requiring pavement (attached). A summary of those reasons are as follows: 1. Water Quality- The Spokane Valley - Rathdrum Prairie aquifer is a "sole source aquifer" because it is the only feasible source of drinking water to the community. By paving and providing storm water treatment, pollutants are removed before they can enter the aquifer. 2. Air Quality- The Spokane area has a history of poor air quality and until 2005 was a non - attainment area for both carbon monoxide and particulate matter. Since that time, a maintenance plan was adopted to maintain air quality to EPA standards. Spokane Regional Clean Air Agency Regulations require preventing particulate matter from becoming airborne. 3. The Hearing Examiner conditioned a subdivision project to pave a proposed gravel driveway because of potential violations to the regulations mentioned above. 4. The Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan has policies in place to protect critical areas, surface water, and air quality including policy NEP -19 "Require parking lots and streets in new development to be paved." 5. Spokane County requires off - street parking, and storage areas be paved unless the areas are routinely used by cleated and other heavy equipment. This language has been carried over into the current SVMC. OPTIONS: If the City Council wishes to make a change, a comprehensive plan and code amendment would be required. In staff opinion, eliminating paving would be inconsistent with existing state mandates and would likely be appealed by agencies that protect water and air quality. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: The staff recommendation is that paving requirements not be forwarded for further action. BUDGET /FINANCIAL IMPACTS: N/A STAFF CONTACT: Kathy McClung, Community Development Director ATTACHMENTS DRAFT Paving Handout DRAFT Why Do Parking Lots Need to be Paved? 1) Water Quality Spokane Regional Stormwater Manual The Spokane Valley- Rathdrum Prairie aquifer extends across an area of about 325 square miles and provides drinking water for more than 500,000 people. Most of the developed areas in the Spokane region and in North Idaho lie directly over the aquifer. The aquifer is designated by the U.S. EPA as a "sole source aquifer" because it is the only feasible source of drinking water available to the local community. Water quality treatment facilities are designed to protect the aquifer by removing pollutants contained in stormwater runoff. The pollutants of concern include sand, silt, and other suspended solids; metals such as copper, lead and zinc; nutrients such as nitrogen and phosphorus; certain bacteria and viruses; and organics such as petroleum hydrocarbons and pesticides. Methods of pollutant removal include sedimentation /settling, filtration, plant uptake, ion exchange, adsorption, and organic and inorganic decomposition. Pollutants in the stormwater are removed from the stormwater when the runoff goes through a treatment facility. Maximizing the amount of stormwater, and thus pollutants, that ends up in a treatment facility assists in maximizing the quality of the water that ends up in the aquifer. Pavement has a higher runoff coefficient (C = 0.90) than gravel (C = 0.55). Because of this, a surface covered with pavement will end up sending more stormwater over to a facility than a gravel surface will and, conversely, a gravel surface will allow more untreated runoff to go directly down into the ground and the aquifer than will pavement. P:AClerk \AgendaPackets for Web \agendapacket 06 -29 -10 \Item 9 Pave Parking Lots. docx 2) Air Quality A) Spokane Regional Clean Air Agency (SRCAA, previously known as the Spokane County Air Pollution Control Authority or SCAPCA) Spokane PM10 Limited Maintenance Plan • http : / /www.spokanecleanair.or2 /pm10 limited maintenance plan.asp Local air pollution control agencies periodically submit air quality plan updates and regulations to the Department of Ecology (Ecology) for inclusion in Washington's State Implementation Plan (SIP). The SIP is a statewide plan for meeting federal health -based standards for certain air pollutants. The Spokane area was designated nonattainment for particulate matter air pollution equal to or less than 10 microns in size (PM This means that, in the past, the area did not meet federal health -based standards for PM As the area has been meeting the standards since 1994, it has now been redesignated to attainment by the federal Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Spokane PM1 a Nonaltainment Area Monitoring Sites i 4 463GGGRS _ r 481W,',_ 456@@GnacE On � E F.�GG I .. I �. . Spokane Valley Spokane 489000. 45BGO 5271000. Monitoring Sites / 1 1. Spokane Auto Glass �i 2. Boone Street 3. Hamilton Street f' ❑ep3Mer m ewmgy, na o 7 =r.Nrn + ❑ particulate Area 4. Crown Zellerbach I, 5, Millwood City Hall Carbon Monoxide Area 6. University City vzsma 7. Country Homes 8. Nazarene Church The Spokane County Air Pollution Control Agency and Ecology have prepared a plan, called a Limited Maintenance Plan, for PM This plan demonstrates that the Spokane area meets Federal Clean Air Act requirements for PM, It also summarizes the progress of the area in attaining the PM standard, demonstrates that the Spokane area qualifies for EPA's Limited Maintenance Plan option, and includes a maintenance plan to assure continued attainment for ten years after the redesignation. P:AClerk\AgendaPackets for Web \agendapacket 06 -29 -10 \Item 9 Pave Parking Lots.docx For LMP excerpt, see EPA section below. Spokane Valley must take steps to "to assure continued attainment for ten years after the redesignation." Spokane Regional Clean Air Agency Regulations http://www.spokanecleanair.org /re--Lilations.asp ARTICLE I, POLICY, SHORT TITLE, AND DEFINITIONS SECTION 1.04 GENERAL DEFINITIONS PM10 means particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter less than or equal to a nominal 10 micrometers as measured by a reference method based on 40 CFR Part 50 Appendix J and designated in accordance with 40 CFR Part 53 or by an equivalent method designated in accordance with 40 CFR Part 53. PM10 Emissions means finely- divided solid or liquid material, including condensible particulate matter, with an aerodynamic diameter less than or equal to a nominal 10 micrometers emitted to the ambient air as measured by an applicable reference method, or an equivalent or alternate method, specified in Appendix M of 40 CFR Part 51 or by a test method specified in the SIP. ARTICLE VI, EMISSIONS PROHIBITED, EFFECTIVE: May 3, 2010 SECTION 6.04 EMISSION OF AIR CONTAMINANT: DETRIMENT TO PERSON OR PROPERTY C. It shall be unlawful for any person to cause or allow the emission of any air contaminant in sufficient quantities and of such characteristics and duration as is, or is likely to be: 1. Injurious to the health or safety of human, animal, or plant life; 2. Injurious or cause damage to property; or 3. Which unreasonably interferes with enjoyment of life and property. H. Nothing in this Section shall be construed to impair any cause of action or legal remedy of any person, or the public for injury or damages arising from the emission of any air contaminant in such place, manner or concentration as to constitute air pollution or a common law nuisance. SECTION 6.05 PARTICULATE MATTER AND PREVENTING PARTICULATE MATTER FROM BECOMING AIRBORNE A. It shall be unlawful for any person to cause or allow the discharge of particulates in sufficient numbers to unreasonably cause annoyance to any other person when deposited upon the real property of others. D. It shall be unlawful for any person, including the owner or person in control of real property to cause or allow particulate matter to be deposited upon a paved roadway open to the public without taking every reasonable precaution to minimize deposition. Reasonable precautions shall include, but are not limited to, the removal of particulate matter from equipment prior to movement on paved streets and the prompt removal of any particulate matter deposited on paved streets. P:AClerk\AgendaPackets for Web \agendapacket 06 -29 -10 \Item 9 Pave Parking Lots. docx E. It shall be unlawful for any person to cause or allow visible emissions of fugitive dust unless reasonable precautions are employed to minimize the emissions. Reasonable precautions may include, but are not limited to, one or more of the following: 2. Surfacing roadways and parking areas with asphalt, concrete, or gravel; SECTION 6.15 STANDARDS FOR CONTROL OF PARTICULATE MATTER ON UNPAVED ROADS Applying a palliative is an example of what to do for unpaved travelways to keep down dust but the palliatives themselves may be considered pollutants that could contaminate the aquifer. B. Definitions. 6. Palliative means salts and other hygroscopic materials, petroleum resins, asphalt emulsions, adhesives, chemical soil stabilizers or other surface treatment materials acting as a method of dust control, and not prohibited for use by any local, state, or federal law, rule, or regulation. 7. Paved means application of concrete, asphaltic concrete, asphalt, or combination thereof as a means of forming a permanent surface for a road. 8. PM10 Nonattainment Area means the Spokane County PM10 Nonattainment Area, defined in CFR Title 40, Part 81, as designated on November 15, 1990. This definition will remain in effect, even after EPA makes the determination that the PM 10 standard that existed before September 16, 1997, no longer applies to Spokane County. Retaining the definition ensures compliance with the EPA's Guidance for Implementing the 1 -Hour Ozone and Pre - Existing PM10 NAAQS, dated December 29, 1997, by continuing implementation of control measures in the Implementation Plan and preserving air quality gains. C. Emission Reduction and Control Plan. Each applicable governmental entity shall submit an Emission Reduction and Control Plan for approval by the Authority, which includes the following for each applicable unpaved road: 1. A schedule for paving, periodic application of palliative, or implementation of other control measures. 2. Specification of the type of palliative to be applied and its application rate, paving specifications, or specifications of other control measures with sufficient detail for the Authority to determine emission reductions. PXlerk\AgendaPackets for Web \agendapacket 06 -29 -10 \Item 9 Pave Parking Lots. docx B) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Region 10: the Pacific Northwest Spokane, Washington PM -10 Maintenance Plan Summary • http:// Yosemite. epa. qov/ rl0/ airpage. nsf/ 283d45bd5bbO68e6882565Of0064cdc2 /84Of6ea82e 294fOf88257053007e8625 ?OpenDocument Background of the Plan: Spokane, Washington was designated nonattainment for PM -10 and classified as a moderate nonattainment area upon enactment of the 1990 Clean Air Act amendments. Washington submitted a PM -10 attainment plan for Spokane on December 12, 1994 which EPA approved on January 27, 1997 (62 FR 3800). On November 30, 2004, Washington submitted a PM -10 Limited Maintenance Plan (LMP) and redesignation request for Spokane. EPA approved the LMP and redesignated the area to attainment on July 1, 2005 (70 FR 38029). A section of the LMP (essentially the same as the Spokane Regional Clean Air Agency Regulations): SECTION 6.05 - PARTICULATE MATTER AND PREVENTING PARTICULATE MATTER FROM BECOMING AIRBORNE A. It shall be unlawful for any person to cause or allow the discharge of particulates in sufficient numbers to unreasonably cause annoyance to any other person when deposited upon the real property of others, except as follows: 1. Temporarily due to breakdown of equipment provided the breakdown is reported as soon as possible but no later than the next regular working day and repairs are promptly made. 2. The time period allowed by the Control Officer for the owner or operator to meet the compliance order. D. It shall be unlawful for any person, including the owner or person in control of real property to cause or allow particulate matter to be deposited upon a paved roadway open to the public without taking every reasonable precaution to minimize deposition. Reasonable precautions shall include, but are not limited to, the removal of particulate matter from equipment prior to movement on paved streets and the prompt removal of any particulate matter deposited on paved streets. State effective: 11112193; EPA effective: 3128197 P:AClerk\AgendaPackets for Web \agendapacket 06 -29 -10 \Item 9 Pave Parking Lots. docx C) Spokane Valley example of paving required to improve air quality - Note — at the time of this project, driveways were not required to be paved. Prior to the city's requirement to pave driveways, the Hearing Examiner added a requirement for paving to SUB- 05 -06, a preliminary plat application. The applicant had proposed a private, gravel driveway of 325 feet. The neighbors objected and requested that the Hearing Examiner require the driveway to be paved because of the dust, noise and health impacts gravel would generate. A representative from Spokane County Air Pollution Control Authority submitted comments that deposition of dust from the proposed driveway onto adjacent property could be considered a violation of SCAPA's air quality regulations. P:AClerk\AgendaPackets for Web \agendapacket 06 -29 -10 \Item 9 Pave Parking Lots. docx 3) Codes A) Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan 8.2 Critical Areas Jurisdictions are required to protect critical areas through the adoption of policies and regulations. Critical areas include: (a) wetlands, (b) areas with a critical recharging effect on aquifers used for domestic purposes; ... Spokane Valley recognizes the importance of protecting the functions of critical areas. Preservation of these areas helps to maintain the high quality of life that is enjoyed by the residents of Spokane Valley. These natural systems play valuable roles in storm water disposal, flood prevention, water quality preservation, as well as providing recreational opportunities. Protection of critical areas makes economic sense, since the alternative is expensive engineered systems for protection from floods and geological hazards and for purification of drinking water. 8.2.2 Aquifer Recharge Areas and Groundwater Critical Areas required to be identified and protected by the City of Spokane Valley include aquifer recharge areas. The Spokane Valley /Rathdrum Prairie Aquifer supplies potable water to most of the residents of Spokane County. The aquifer and associated recharge areas underlies the entire City of Spokane Valley. Due to concerns regarding the maintenance of water quality of the aquifer, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) designated the Spokane Valley /Rathdrum Prairie Aquifer a "Sole Source Aquifer" in 1978. The aquifer was only the second in the nation to receive such a designation. Although the aquifer provides high quality drinking water, it is highly susceptible to contamination due to the underlying geology of the area. The underlying geology of the area consists of sandy, gravelly glacial outwash that allows surface water to infiltrate rapidly. Since 1977, fifty monitoring wells in Washington and twenty -eight wells in Idaho have been installed to monitor the impacts of land surface activities over the Aquifer. Monitoring indicates that contaminants have reached the Aquifer; however, the Aquifer water quality remains very good. The goals and policies in this section are intended to protect the aquifer and address issues critical to aquifer recharge areas. 8.3 Surface Water Water quality and quantity influences the domestic, economic, recreational and natural environments of Spokane Valley. Historically, clean water has been taken for granted. As growth and development have increased, so have problems associated with maintaining water quality and quantity. Industry, commercial, business, agriculture and residential development all contribute to reduced water quality and quantity. From this perspective, a comprehensive approach must be taken to ensure future water quality and quantity. Spokane Valley has a limited number of surface water bodies, the major water bodies being the Spokane River and Shelley Lake. The Spokane River provides the region with significant economic, recreation, wildlife habitat and aesthetic value. The Spokane River is included in the State's "303d" inventory as having impaired water quality. The use of the Spokane River as a receiving water for sewage effluent discharges and stormwater runoff makes it an important resource for waste assimilation. There is P: \Clerk\AgendaPackets for Web \agendapacket 06 -29 -10 \Item 9 Pave Parking Lots. docx evidence that pumping from the Spokane Valley /Rathdrum Prairie Aquifer has a direct effect on the Spokane River, reducing the flow in the river. The increased impervious area resulting from development changes the amount and the quality of runoff water. If left unmanaged, discharges of stonnwater can cause flooding and water quality degradation, especially in already impaired water bodies. Increased impervious areas may also adversely impact groundwater recharge. In Spokane Valley, runoff from developed areas is typically sent into a grassy swale or pond and then infiltrated into the ground and is also infiltrated via drywells thus, in the City, groundwater recharge is still facilitated. A key concern, though, is that the Spokane River obtains some of its flow from groundwater that is flowing from the ground back into the channel. If this groundwater carries pollutants then these pollutants will enter the Spokane River and impair its water quality. 8.4 Air Quality Air pollution levels in Washington State are within one percent of violating federal standards for smog (ozone), three percent for carbon monoxide, and seven percent for fine particles. Until recently (August 2005), the Spokane area, including Spokane Valley was a non - attainment area for both carbon monoxide and particulate matter. (Source: Washington State Department of Ecology 2000 — 2002 Air Quality Trends Report) 8.6 Goals and Policies Aquifer /Groundwater • Goal NEG -9 Strive to prevent water quality degradation of the Spokane Valley /Rathdrum Prairie Aquifer. • Goal NEG -10 Endeavor to protect groundwater quality from adverse development impacts. Surface Water • Goal NEG -17 Encourage the continued provision of both adequate quantity and quality of surface water for Spokane Valley. • Goal NEG -18 Encourage land uses that are consistent with long -term protection of surface water quality and quantity in Spokane Valley. • Goal NEG -19 Collaborate with appropriate public and private entities to help restore the water quality of the Spokane River. Policies NEP -19.1 Impacts of a development proposal upon surface water quality shall be considered before development is approved. Conditioning proposals may be necessary to protect water quality (e.g, biofiltration measures), manage runoff and address erosion control and sedimentation. Air Quality • Goal NEG -20 Support regional efforts to improve air quality. Policies NEP -20.4 Require parking lots and streets in new development to be paved. P:AClerk\AgendaPackets for Web \agendapacket 06 -29 -10 \Item 9 Pave Parking Lots. docx B) Spokane County Zoning Code Initially Used for Spokane Valley 14.802.080 Parking Lot Design, Surfacing and Marking Requirements Within Urban IM pact Area All off-street parking and commercial, industrial storage areas within the Urban Impact Area shall be graded and a paved surface installed before a Certificate of Occupancy for the building is issued. All paving shall be done in a manner consistent with standards set forth by the Spokane County Engineer and this Code, except for the exemptions listed below, which shall be graded and hard- surfaced. Exemptions: 1. Parking and storage areas routinely used by cleated and other heavy equipment as approved by the Planning Director. 2. The Planning Director may waive portions of these requirements upon recommendations by the Spokane County Air Pollution Control Authority or Spokane County Engineer's Office when it can be demonstrated that the proposed surfacing, such as grass pavers or other technology, will not adversely affect air quality, water quality or the integrity of the parking area. C) Current Spokane Valley Municipal Code Chapter 19.60 DISTRICT PURPOSE AND SUPPLEMENTAL USE REGULATIONS — COMMERCIAL, OFFICE AND MIXED USE ZONES 19.60.010 General requirements. B. Parking areas shall be paved and landscaped in accordance with Chapter 22.50 SVMC. Chapter 19.70 DISTRICT PURPOSE AND SUPPLEMENTAL USE REGULATIONS — INDUSTRIAL ZONES 19.70.010 1 -1, Light Industrial district. B. Supplemental Regulations. 5. All parking, maneuvering and outdoor storage areas shall be paved. Exemptions: a. Parking and storage areas routinely used by cleated and other heavy equipment as approved by the planning director. b. The planning director may waive portions of these requirements upon recommendation by the Spokane regional clean air agency or the Spokane Valley development engineering division when it can be demonstrated that the proposed surfacing, such as grass pavers or other technology, will not adversely affect air quality, water quality or the integrity of the parking area. P:AClerk\AgendaPackets for Web \agendapacket 06 -29 -10 \Item 9 Pave Parking Lots.docx 19.70.020 1 -2, Heavy Industrial district. B. Supplemental Regulations. 4. All parking, maneuvering and outdoor storage areas shall be paved. Exemptions: a. Parking and storage areas routinely used by cleated and other heavy equipment as approved by the planning director. b. The planning director may waive portions of these requirements upon recommendation by the Spokane regional clean air agency or the Spokane Valley development engineering division when it can be demonstrated that the proposed surfacing, such as grass pavers or other technology, will not adversely affect air quality, water quality or the integrity of the parking area. P:AClerk\AgendaPackets for Web \agendapacket 06 -29 -10 \Item 9 Pave Parking Lots.docx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: June 29, 2010 City Manager Sign -off: Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ® admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Ballot Measure — One -Way vs Two -Way — Sprague Appleway GOVERNING LEGISLATION: PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: BACKGROUND: At the regular Council meeting on June 8 t ", 2010, Councilmember Grafos introduced the concept of placing the issue of one -way versus two -way traffic around the couplet and U -City on the General Election Ballot in November. Mayor Towey and Deputy Mayor Schimmels also expressed interest in this concept. Pursuant to this, City Clerk Chris Bainbridge has contacted Mike McLaughlin, Spokane County Elections Manager, and has determined the following: The cost to place this matter on the November ballot is approximately $10,000 to $15,000. The cost to place the measure on a special ballot (with no other ballot measures) would be approximately $100,000. The November ballot so far does not include any bond issue but it does include a Fire Department LID levy lift. The deadline to file a resolution for the November 2nd General Election is August 10, 2010. The deadline to file a resolution for the February 8, 2011 election is December 25, 2010. Current Action Taken: On Thursday, June 13, 2010, Acting City Manager Mike Jackson and City Attorney Mike Connelly met with Mike Ormsbsy, Bond Attorney with K & L Gates to discuss the proposed measure. Mr. Ormsby felt the deadline of filing a resolution with Spokane County by August 10 is achievable and should have a draft ballot measure for the City to review in the near future. Public Works Department has expressed concern over the budget numbers provided by Gladding Jackson for the Sprague Appleway conversion. The costs previously provided are planning level estimates only. Public Works recommends the preparation of engineering level cost estimates and will proceed with developing those estimates. If Council decides not to move forward with the ballot measure, Public Works can discontinue work on this project. Public Works will provide the engineering estimates for the transportation portion only. The landscaping, sidewalk and other improvements were prepared by Gladding Jackson and we will rely on them for an update on their costs. Issues to Resolve: The questions for City Council at this time include: 1) Define the scope of conversion of one -way or two -way i.e. from University to Argonne, or to include the entire couplet. 2) Does City Council wish to pursue the streetscape improvements? 3) Does the Council wish to include a funding measure i.e. a bond issue with the transportation improvements? Schedule: An administrative report to the City Council to discuss this information and other issues as desired by Council has been scheduled for June 29, 2010. Additional discussions can occur on July 6 and July 13, 2010, as needed. First reading of an ordinance authorizing the ballot measure and related funding July 22, 2010. Second reading proposed ordinance authorizing the ballot measure and related funding July 27, 2010. A resolution requesting that Spokane County place this matter on the ballot July 27, 2010. OPTIONS: RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: BUDGET /FINANCIAL IMPACTS: STAFF CONTACT: Mike Jackson ATTACHMENTS: DRAFT ADVANCE AGENDA For Planning Discussion Purposes Only as of June 23, 2010; 10:45 a.m. Please note this is a work in progress; items are tentative To: Council & Staff From: City Clerk, by direction of Acting City Manager Re: Draft Schedule for Upcoming Council Meetings July 6, 2010, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m. [due date Mon, June 28] Citizen Recognition: Floodplain Contributions Action Item: 1. Motion Consideration: Bid Award, 44 Ave Pathway Project — Steve Worley (5 minutes) Non - action Items: 2. Dr. Joel McCullough, Spokane Regional Health District Chief Medical Officer (confirmed) (10 minutes) 3. Comcast Extension Ordinance — Cary Driskell /Mike Connelly (20 minutes) 4. Budget Process Update — Mike Jackson/Ken Thompson (20 minutes) 5. Transportation Benefit District — Mike Connelly (15 minutes) 6. Advance Agenda (5 minutes) 7. Info Only: Truck Parking, Residential Areas [ *estimated meeting: 75 minutes] July 13, 2010, Special Meeting: Budget Retreat — CenterPlace Classroom 212 9:00 a.m. to approx 4:00 p.m. [due date Mon, July 5] July 13, 2010 Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. [due date Mon, July 5] Proclamation: Parks & Recreation Month 1. Consent Agenda: Claims, Payroll, Minutes (5 minutes) 2. First Reading Proposed Ordinance Amending Comcast Franchise — Mike Connelly (20 minutes) 3. First Reading Proposed Ordinance, Panhandling — Cary Driskell (15 minutes) 4. Admin Report: Subarea Plan (SARP) Check -in — Kathy McClung (15 minutes) 5. Admin Report: Code Text CTA 03 -10 amendment — Christina Janssen (15 minutes) 6. Mixed Avenue Report Back to Council — Scott Kuhta (45 minutes) 7. Admin Report: Advance Agenda (5 minutes) 8. Info Only: TIB Call for Projects [ *estimated meeting: 120 minutes] July 20, 2010, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m. [due date Mon, July 12] ACTION ITEM: 1. First Reading Ordinance, Ballot Measure — Mike Jackson /Mike Connelly /Mike Ormbsv_ (20 minutes) NON - ACTION ITEMS: 2. Bike Helmets — Marion Lee — Spokane County Health Dept (confirmed) (15 minutes) 3. TIB Call for Projects — Steve Worley (20 minutes) 4. Admin Report: Street Preservation Program — Steve Worley (30 minutes) 5. Subarea Plan (SARP) Zone Discussion: Neighborhood Ctrs — Mike Basinger (30 minutes) 6. Advance Agenda (5 minutes) 7. Info Only: Department Reports [ *estimated meeting: 120 minutes] July 27, 2010, Formal Meeting Format 6:00 p.m. [due date Mon, July 191 1. Consent Agenda: Claims, Payroll, Minutes (5 minutes) 2. Second Reading Proposed Ordinance Amending Comcast Franchise — Driskell (20 minutes) 3. Second Reading Proposed Ordinance, Panhandling — Driskell (15 minutes) 4. Second Reading Proposed Ordinance, Ballot Measure — Mike Jackson/Mike Connelly (15 minutes) 5. First Reading Proposed Ordinance, CTA 03 -10 Code text Amendment — Christina Janssen (15 minutes) 6. Proposed Resolution: Ballot Measure — Mike Jackson /Mike Connelly (10 minutes) 7. Motion Consideration: SRTC (Spokane Regional Transportation Council) Interlocal — M.Connelly (10 min) 8. Motion Consideration: TIB Call for Projects — Steve Worley (10 minutes) Draft Advance Agenda 6/24/2010 2:51:28 PM Page 1 of 3 9. Advance Agenda (5 minutes) 10. Info Only: Department Reports [ *estimated meeting: 105 minutes] August 3, 2010, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m. (National Night Out) [due date Mon, July 26] 1. Advance Agenda (5 minutes) August 10, 2010 Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. jdue date Mon, Aug 2]] 1. Consent Agenda: Claims, Payroll, Minutes (5 minutes) 2. Second Reading Proposed Ordinance, CTA 03 -10 Code Text Amendment- Christina Janssen (15 minutes) 3. Motion Consideration: Setting Prelim. Budget Hearings 9 -14 & 9 -28 - Ken Thompson (5 minutes) 4. Admin Report: Estimates of 2010 & 2011 Revenue /Expenditures - Ken Thompson (10 minutes) 5. Admin Report: Subarea Plan (SARP) Report to Council re Public Mtg - S. Kuhta - (45 minutes) 6. Admin Report: Advance Agenda (5 minutes) [ *estimated meeting: 85 minutes] August 17, 2010, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m. [due date Mon, Aug 9] 1. Subarea Plan (SARP) Zone Discussion: City Center - Mike Basinger (30 minutes) 2. 2011 Budget - Property Tax Levies - Ken Thompson (15 minutes) 3. Admin Report: Code Text Amendment, CTA 05 -10 - Christina Janssen (10 minutes) 4. Advance Agenda [ *estimated meeting: 55 minutes] August 24, 2010, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. [due date Mon, Aug 16] 1. PUBLIC HEARING: 2011 Budget Revenues - Ken Thompson (10 minutes) 2. First Reading Proposed Ordinance adopting 2011 Property Tax Levy- Ken Thompson (15 minutes) 3. First Reading Proposed Ordinance property tax confirmation - Ken Thompson (10 minutes) 4. Admin Report: Outside Agency Presentations - Ken Thompson (60 minutes) 5. Admin Report: Advance Agenda (5 minutes) 6. Info Only Department Reports [ *estimated meeting: 100 minutes] August 31, 2010, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m. 1. Advance Agenda 2. Info Only: Preliminary Budget September 7, 2010, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m. 1. Advance Agenda [due date Mon, Aug 23] [ *estimated meeting: minutes] [due date Mon, Aug 30] (5 minutes) [ *estimated meeting: minutes] September 14, 2010 Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. jdue date Fri Sept 3] 1. PUBLIC HEARING: 2011 budget - Ken Thompson (5 minutes) 2. Second Reading Ordinance adopting 2011 Property tax Lew - Ken Thompson (15 minutes) 3. Second Reading Ordinance property tax confirmation -Ken Thompson (5 minutes) 4. Motion Consideration: Allocation of Funds to Outside Agencies - Ken Thompson (25 minutes) 5. Subarea Plan (SARP) Plan) - Update to Council - Mike Basinger (30 minutes) [ *estimated meeting: 80 minutes] September 21, 2010, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m. [due date Mon, Sept 13] 1. Community Development Block Grant - Greg McCormick (15 minutes) 2. Advance Agenda [ *estimated meeting: minutes] September 28, 2010, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. [due date Mon, Sept 20] 1. PUBLIC HEARING: 2011 budget - Ken Thompson (5 minutes) 2. First Reading Ordinance to adopt 2011 Budget - Ken Thompson (15 minutes) 3. Subarea Plan (SARP) Zone Comm. Blvd - Lori Barlow (45 minutes) 4. Info Only: Department Reports [ *estimated meeting: 65 minutes] Draft Advance Agenda 6/24/2010 2:51:28 PM Page 2 of 3 October 5, 2010, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m. 1. Advance Agenda October 12, 2010 Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. 1. Consent Agenda (Claims, minutes, payroll) 2. Second Reading Ordinance to adopt 2011 Budget — Ken Thompson 3. Admin Report: Fee Resolution Proposed Changes — Mike Jackson 4. Advance Agenda October 19, 2010, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m. 1. SARP Report to Council — Kathy McClung 2. Advance Agenda October 26, 2010, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 i).m. 1. Consent Agenda (Claims, minutes, payroll) 2. Proposed Resolution Amending Fee Resolution — Mike Jackson 3. Advance Agenda 4. Info Only: Department Reports Affordable Housing Participation Alternative Analysis (contracts) Area Agency on Aging Bidding Contracts (SVMC 3. — bidding exceptions) Broadcasting Capital Projects Funding Clean Air Agency Code Amendments (Kathy McClung) Proposed Ordinance Amending CTR Plan — Morgan Concurrency Contract Ordinance Amendment East Gateway Monument Structure 4 Hotel/Motel Grant Proposals for 2011 (Nov 20 10) Industrial Pre - treatment Interlocal w /City of Spokane Jail Update Law Enforcement Interlocal Milwaukee Right -of -way ■ Overweight /over size vehicle ordinance Planned Action Ordinance Shoreline Master Program "Inventory & Charac.Rpt" Solid Waste Amended Interlocal Speed Limits Sprague Appleway Corridor Environ. Assessment Street Maintenance Facility Transportation Benefit District Interlocal Transportation Benefit District: (a). Establish ord.; (h) set public hearing; (c) draft resolution; (d) ballot language Transportation Impacts [due date Mon, Sept 27] (5 minutes) [ *estimated meeting: minutes] jdue date Mon Oct 4] (5 minutes) (15 minutes) (15 minutes) (5 minutes) [ *estimated meeting: 40 minutes] [due date Mon, Oct 11] (45 minutes) [ *estimated meeting: minutes] [due date Mon, Oct 18] (15 minutes) [ *estimated meeting: minutes] WIRA, Water Protection Commitment, public education ■ = request for Council's early consideration 4 = Awaiting action by others * = doesn't include time for public or council comments Draft Advance Agenda 6/24/2010 2:51:28 PM Page 3 of 3 rater � P o k, Incorporated June 17, 2010 Honorable Tom Towey, Mayor Mr. Mike Jackson, Interim City Manager City of Spokane Valley 11707 East Sprague Avenue Spokane Valley, WA 99206 Mayor Towey, Mr. Jackson and members of the City Council: 801 W. Riverside I Suite 100 Spokane, Washington 99201 P: 509.624.1393 P: 509.747.0077 greaterspokaneincorporated.org Greater Spokane Incorporated is pleased to submit its 2010 first quarter report of activities to the City of Spokane Valley. This report includes information on the following: ➢ Recruitment Activities ➢ Business Retention and Expansion Activities ;P� Industry Engagements Y Business Development Projects Strategic Engagements Workforce and Education Activities The report also includes copies of various marketing materials that were distributed during the quarter. If you have any questions about the report, or would like a presentation on the information included, please don't hesitate to call our offices. Sincerely, r - obin . Tot}: I'; ° co Development Greater Spokane Incorporated Attachment Th Spokane E©C and Chamber — integrated to accelerate regional economic prosperity n e " t .. 1 Quarter 2010 Report (January 1 -- March 31, 2010) Recruitment Activities: Recruitment � _ ■i ! 1 New Prospects 2009 57 2009 YT® 575 !)nln LV I,M 57 New Qualified Leads Generated - 12 29 21 Hosted Visits in Spokane 3 18 3 Visits to a Recruitment Lead's Location 7 44 3 Recruitment Wins 0 -1 1 Direct Jobs Created 0 5 3 Indirect Jobs Created 0 5 2 Direct Investment $0 $0 $0 Direct Annual wages $0 $200,000 $105,000 Annual Economic Output $0 $1,335,759 $551,450 Local Annual Local Tax Revenue from Output $0 $16,828 $5,810 One -Time Construction Direct/Indirect Jobs $0 /0 $010 $0 /0 One Time Construction Total Economic Impact $0 $0 $0 Outbound Visits to a lead's location Hosted leads' visits Isere in Spokane 1. Project WIE (Clean Tech- March) 1. Project Chuckles (Entertainment- Feb. 2, Project G (Manufacturing- January) 2. Project Domas (Customer Care- Feb.) 3. Project AHC (Manufacturing — various) 3. Project W/E (Clean Tech- March) Recruitment Wins: A win is defined as a company that formally announces the selection of the Spokane Region as a place to site their business. There was one recruitment win in 012010. o One Earth Starch- A biodegradable packing manufacturer, located to the Spokane Valley and has a total of three employees. Recruitment Losses: A loss is defined as a company who seriously considered the Spokane Region as a place to locate their business, but who ultimately located to another town / city from their short -list. There were no recruitment losses in 012010. Outreach Activities: • Responded to 21 requests for proposals O Contacted 2,006 site selection consultants : o Electronic mail pieces were sent to national and international site consultants and corporate real estate brokers. Articles highlighted: ■ Greater Spokane Incorporated Business Barometer • Generated 41 media hits in Q1 equaling to $33,033 in advertising. Advertisements in Trade and Industry Development — January/February and March /April, Business Expansion Journal — January/February and Alaska /Horizon insert. Also contracted for a 2010 campaign at wvvw. sit_elocatiot Qualified 4� €>f Generation Aerospace/ Manufacturing a 012010 4 Health and Biomedical 2 IT and Digital Services 4 Clean Tech and Energy Efficiency - 6 Other 5 Number of times local real estate was suhmitted in clien ro Deals City of Cheney Q4 200-Q 0 200-9 YTD 1 01 2010 0 Spokane County 2 43 20 City of Spokane 27 54 9 City of Spokane Valley '16 50 26 City of Liberty Lake 10 26 9 2 Business Retention & Expansion (BRE) Activities: - Q4 Q1 0 2 VTD -- 009 - 2010 _ New Business Retention & Ex ansion Prospect Cases e 56 18 Business Retention & Expansion Wins 0 2 2 Direct Jobs Created 1 Retained 0 435 0 Indirect Jobs Created 1 Retained 0 184 0 Direct Investment $0 $10,200,000 $860,000 Direct Annual wages $0 $1 - 1,332,000 $385,000 Annual Economic Output $0 $42,333,930 $3,923,701 Local Annual Tax Revenue from Total Output $0 .x1,087,536 $40,019 $3,500,0001 $860,0001 One -Time Construction Impact Direct/indirect Jobs 010 $2,639,182 $642,226 One -Time Construction Total Economic Impact $0 $6,139,182 $1,502,226 Business Retention & Expansion Prospects: A business retention & expansion prospect is a local or regional company that has contacted GSI with a business climate, policy, expansion, or retention issue. Business Retention & Expansion Wins: There were two BR &E wins in 012010 Lumber Yard Supply o The company will hire four employees, some within the City of Spokane's Community Empowerment Zone, and invest over $360,000 in new construction. Western Systems o The company will hire seven new employees, one within the CEZ, and invest over $500,000 in new construction, while taking advantage of tax savings available through the CEZ program. Industry Engagement: e Clean Technology and Energy Efficiency o Promoted Spokane's upcoming Clean Tech Open 2010 competition, sponsored by CLEEN. The event will be a kick -off and networking reception. Guest speakers to include: Don Carkner, CH2M Hill; GoNano Technologies, Moscow, ID; Rivertop Renewables, Missoula, Montana; and John Martin from the 2010 CTO committee. o Planning CLEEN NW event for Wednesday, June 16 at the Davenport. Speakers to include Senator Brown, Mayor Verner, Hal Calbom, and a video message from Senator Cantwell. o Placed advertisements focused on Spokane clean technology in publications such as Trade & Industry and Business Expansion Journal. Also used "Green Biz and Buzz" e- newsletter to communicate local news and events to 600+ regional engineers, architects, innovators, and more. o Launching CLEEN NW's website, www.cfeennw.org. Website to be launched in early May. The website is in its final stages and contains sections on incentives, how to green your business, regional partners, and a searchable directory in which one can find clean tech businesses or add their business to the list. o Participated on the Waste -to- Energy committee looking at the potential for creation of a green industrial park. Next step is for creation of marketing material. o Partnered on Sustainable ME, an educational program targeted at preparing our workers for green careers. Advanced Manufacturing /Aerospace o Attended MD &M trade show in Los Angeles. Visited 50 exhibitors and came away with four strong leads. Will continue to work leads. o Developing annual recruitment program for aerospace OEMs, trade show calendar and new inwac.org website. o Helped with recruiting aerospace companies for workforce survey. o Assisted Aerospace Futures Alliance with outreach on legislative requests including funds for training center in Spokane, continuation of incentives, and work on unemployment insurance and workers compensation. 4 • Health Sciences and Services o Assisted in the development of the Alaska /Horizon annual February insert which was focused on the regional health sciences and services industry. o Working on the new marketing collateral piece for health sciences and services. Will be available next quarter. o Other health sciences and services activities listed in Strategic Engagements. BIZStreet Activities BIZStreet workshops and PTAC Services are open to all businesses irrespective of membership in Greater Spokane Incorporated and at no or nominal cost to businesses • In the same period, the BIZStreet Resource Center assisted entrepreneurs with information and services referrals. Small business development workshops were attended by 119 individuals from local Spokane area companies. PTAC hosted 4 educational trainings and gained 16 new clients. Existing PTAC clients reported $1,372,872 in prime contracting awards from January 1- March 31, 2010. Business Development Projects • Spokane VitalsTm o Completed Spokane Vitals 2010. Copies of the publication will be available starting in the second quarter 2010. o Spokane showed improvement from the 2009 publication in areas such as: post - secondary degrees granted; avg. annual wage; percentage of population with health insurance; and student -to- teacher ratio. However, we declined in unemployment rate, non -farm employment and child poverty rate. • www.SelectSpokane.com o SelectSpokane.com partners are: Spokane County, City of Spokane, City of Spokane Valley, City of Liberty Lake, Avista Corp., and Greater Spokane Incorporated. In collaboration with WSU- Spokane, GSI assisted in managing our regional site selector tool. 1,230 user sessions 3.66 minutes avg. time spent on site 13.7 avg. daily users with 7.3 pages viewed per session 5 Strategic Engagements • University District Development o Provided $25,000 in support to the University District project. o Participating on UD Development Board, UD Advisory Committee and MarCom Committees o Began economic impact study of a four -year medical school with Tripp Umbach. • Transportation o Spokane North /South Corridor receives $35M worth of funding for materials and labor to complete the southbound lanes from Francis to Highway 2. A special thanks to Senator Murray for her assistance in retaining these federal funding dollars. • State Legislative Issued Addressed o Developed Regional State Agenda to be used for the 2010 Legislative Session in Olympia. Coordinated annual regional trip to Olympia for 2010 legislative session to showcase regional projects and issues. See copy of State Agenda in your report packet. 0 2010 Olympia Legislative Fly-in In January, 50 individuals from the region attended the trip and meet with the following people to showcase regional projects and issues: Governor Gregoire; Rep. Alexander; Marty Brown - Legislative Director; Sen. Brown; Rep, Driscoll; Rep. Erickson; Sen, Haugen; Senator Hewitt; Sen. Kastama; Rep. Kenney; Sen. Karen Keiser; Rep. Kessler; Rep. Kretz; Rep. Linville; Jim McIntire - Washington State Treasurer; Eleni Papdakis, Executive Director, Washington State Workforce Training and Education Board; Sen. Pflug; Rep. Roach; Rep. Smith; Sen. Tom; Rogers Weed, Director of Department of Commerce; Sen. Zarelli Federal Legislative Issued Addressed o Developed Federal Agenda with regional chamber partners. o 2010 Washington, D.C. Legislative Fly -in ■ Held forums to hear presentations from community partners to vet regional projects and develop the Regional Federal Agenda. ■ Trip is scheduled for week of April 26. Approximately 40 individuals will meet with federal agencies to discuss funding and regional projects. See Eastern Washington Federal Agenda in your report packet. 0 Workforce and Education Activities • Teach the Teachers o Held four "Teach the Teachers" workshops in 01 2010 for Allied Health, Health Care, Manufacturing, and Business and Professional Services. Total of teacher participants in Q1 was 43 o Spring 2010 "Teach the Teachers" workshops will include; ■ Culinary Arts— Anthony's Restaurant, The Davenport Hotel, and Inland Northwest Culinary Academy (INCA) — April 23 ■ Architecture— Integrus and WSU Interdisciplinary Design Institute —April 29 ■ Health Care— CHAS and WSU College of Pharmacy — May 26 ■ Energy— Spokane Waste to Energy Facility —TBD • Career Exploration Day o Held the 2010 Career Exploration Day on March 1 & with 29 teachers and 1,408 registered from 26 different schools ■ Number of teacher and students per school district • District 81 — 7 teachers, 333 students • West Valley SD — 4 teachers, 180 students • Freeman SD — 1 teacher, 15 students • Central Valley SD — 3 teachers, 117 students • Tekoa SD — 1 teacher, 31 students • Nine Mile SD — 1 teacher, 53 students • Mead SD — 2 teachers, 92 students • Rosalia SD — 1 teacher, 50 students • Riverside SD — 2 teachers, 110 students • Newport SD — 1 teacher, 170 students • Cusick SD — 1 teacher, 40 students • Lakeside SD — 1 teacher, 100 students • St. John Endicott HS — 1 teacher, 42 students • Selkirk SD — 1 teacher, 36 students • Lake Pend Oreille SD — 1 teacher, 35 students • St. George's HS -- 1 teacher, 1 student • Home Schools — 3 students ■ 45 businesses/ organizations in the following industries exhibited: aviation, business and professional services, education, energy, health care, manufacturing, &non - profits. 7 • Career Awareness Campaign o Distributed 1,432 CAC materials to 28 teachers who have attended the Teach the Teachers workshops o Distributed a total of 107 SAWDC DVDs and CAC materials to 107 main contact teachers from different school districts • District 81: 27 • Liberty SD: 3 • Central Valley SD: 15 • Newport SD: 3 • West Valley SD: 9 • Nine Mile Falls SD: 4 • East Valley SD: 6 • Reardan /Edwall SD: 2 • Mead SD: 8 • Riverside SD: 4 • Medical Lake SD: 5 • Rosalia SD: 1 • Cheney SD: 6 • St. John Endicott: 1 • Deer Park SD: 4 • Tekoa SD: 3 • Freeman SD: 4 • Cusick SD: 2 HISTORY: Spokane County Regional Animal Protection Service (SCRAPS) was first conceived as the Spokane County Dog Control in 1923. SCRAPS has come a long ways since the early days of the organization. Today SCRAPS is a progressive municipal animal care and protection agency offering much more to the Spokane community and its animals. Today SCRAPS is "Protecting People, Protecting Pets & Saving Lives." SCRAPS currently provides animal care and protection services to the unincorporated areas of Spokane County, and by contract for the cities of Spokane Valley, Liberty Lake, Cheney, Millwood and Fairchild Air Force Base. SCRAPS programs that are in addition to its animal protection service are funded solely through donations. MISSION STATEMENT: "Building a more humane community, protecting public safety and ensuring animal welfare through compassionate, responsive, professional enforcement of laws and public policy." QUICK FACTS: • . In 2009 SCRAPS handled over 6,684 animals • 21 Full time staff, 3 Part time staff • 9 staff positions paid for with donations from the public • 6 Animal Protection Officers to serve approximately 250,000 people and cover over 1700 square miles • 24 hour emergency response ® 40 Volunteers • 78 Dog Kennels • 55 Cat Kennels • Provided over 2,550 spay /neuter vouchers in 2009 SERVICES: • Pet Adoptions • Pet Relinquishment • Licensing & Spay/Neuter Vouchers • Humane Law Enforcement • Educational Programs • Free Dog Training Classes • Free Behavior Consultations & Literature • Free Dog Houses and pet food for pets of low - income residents Building Facts: • Built in 1975 • Remodeled in 1976 • Remodeled in 1996 • Located off of Flora Road with Union Pacific railroad crossing just north of building • 11,500 square foot facility • 1.75 acres owned by the Spokane County Road Department Fund • Rent of $50,000 per year • Septic system • Fire Hydrant located north of railroad tracks • 78 dog kennels • Animal Isolation area • Cat room • After Hours Receiving Room • Crematorium • Garage • Storage /Laundry Areas • Small Break Room • 6 Staff Offices housing 24 staff members • 2 Bathrooms • 22 public parking spaces (one disabled) • 8 Staff /Officer vehicles • Handles approximately 7,000 animals per year • SpokAnimal handles approximately 8,000 per year EM PQ Iii l . OUR MISSION Building a more humane community, protecting public safety and ensuring animal welfare through compassionate, responsive, professional enforcement of laws and public policy. SCRAPS feeds the hungry, shelters the homeless, and gives abandoned pets the chance they deserve. OUR COMMITMENT SCRAPS serves the North SC PAPS 2521 N Flora Road Spokane Valley, WA 99216 (509)477-2532 www.spokanecounty.org /scraps Hours Monday, Tuesday, Thursday, Friday & Saturday Noon- 5:30 pm We are closed Sundays, Wednesdays and Holidays "Protecting People, Protecting Pets, and Saving Lives." Trent Euclid T O d n. z 5CR PS SC PAPS 2521 N Flora Road Spokane Valley, WA 99216 (509)477-2532 www.spokanecounty.org /scraps Hours Monday, Tuesday, Thursday, Friday & Saturday Noon- 5:30 pm We are closed Sundays, Wednesdays and Holidays "Protecting People, Protecting Pets, and Saving Lives." Pet Adoptions Pet Relinquishment (Limited Jurisdiction) % O 'We protect people from dangerous pets and pets from dangerous people. ov % o Animal care and protection services include: 24 hour emergency service • Animal cruelty investigations Animal welfare checks • Responding to animal bites, dogs at large, and barking complaints. 00a0a00000o0o0a a Do you have room in 0 a your family for one more? ' 0 If so, SCRAPS has many 0 a amazing adoptable pets! 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 o a a SCRAPS Behavior Program helps pet owners through free group training classes and Free Behavior and Breed Informational Handouts available at SCRAPS or on -line. SCRAPS also assesses each animal's behavior when they arrive at the shelter in order to properly place them in the right home. Free DogTraining Classes: SCRAPS offers these classes 3 - 4 times per month. Please call ahead to schedule your class at 477 -2532. WHI N G ' WE DO A n IL4 Cnvv lirn� I Im . Licensing (Limited Jurisdiction) Spay /Neuter Vouchers (Limited Jurisdiction) Animal Protection Educational Programs Free Dog Training Classes Free Behavior Consultations & Literature Free Dog Houses for Pets of Low- Income Residents % 0 We rescue pets in need, prevent ani- mal cruelty and champion neglected and abused animals. SPOKANINAL Companion -h Animal 0 Relationship !enrichment YOUR INLAND NORTHWEST HUMANE SOCIETY About: SpokAnimal CARE provides animal control services by contract for the city of Spokane, 12 other cities, and 2 counties. SpokAnimal's programs that are in addition to animal protection service are funded solely through donations. The Lucky To Be Alive Fund helps seriously injured animals in our care receive treatment, then loving homes. Services: Pet Adoptions Pet Relinquishment (Limited jurisdiction) Licensing Spay /Neuter Vouchers (Limited jurisdiction) Spay /Neuter, Vaccinations & Microchipping Animal Protection Educational Programs Pet Food Bank Training Speakers Bureau Pen PF bavers LOW COST S P A Y AND NEUTER CLINIC Pet Savers Mission Statement: "To honor lives of companion animals and our responsibility for their care. To provide a non - lethal solution to pet overpopulation through aggressive, low cost high quality, easily accessible spay - neuter program." About: Pet Savers was established in 1996 as a feline rescue - foster - adoption organization. Realizing that the pet over- population problem would not be solved through adoption alone, Pet Savers shifted its focus to low -cost spay and neuter. The low cost spay neuter clinic began as a MASH unit in 2002 traveling in and around Spokane providing surgical services at day long large scale events. In 2005 the current permanent location was opened. Pet Savers is funded solely upon donations and fees for its services. Services: Low Cost Spay /Neuter Surgeries & Vouchers Microchip & Vaccination Clinics Trap- Neuter - Return for Feral Cats Contact (509) 924 -7826 www.petsavers-spol<ane.org Contact: (509) 534 -8133 www.spokanimal.org Mission Statement: "Building a more humane community by protecting public safety and ensuring animal welfare through compassionate, responsive, professional enforcement of laws and public policy." About: SCRAPS provides animal care and protection services to the unincorporated areas of Spokane County and by contract for the cities of Spokane Valley, Liberty Lake, Cheney, Millwood and Fairchild Air Force Base. SCRAPS programs that are in addition to its animal protection service are funded solely through donations. Services: Pet Adoptions Pet Relinquishment (Limited Jurisdiction) Licensing (Limited Jurisdiction) Spay /Neuter Vouchers (Limited Jurisdiction) Animal Protection Educational Programs Free Dog Training Classes Free Behavior Consultations & Literature Free Dog Houses for Pets of Low- Income Residents Contact: (509) 477 -2532 www.spol(anecounty.org/animal SPOKANE E SOCIETY AM )ig Since 1897 About: Founded in 1897, the Spokane Humane Society is one of the oldest non- profit organizations in Spokane. SHS does not take in stray animals or perform any animal control services, although they assist the other local shelters by transferring in animals from them when space is available. SHS is funded solely upon donations and fees for its services and does not receive any government funding. Services: Pet Adoptions Pet Relinquishment (By Appointment Only) Licensing Spay /Neuter Vouchers Educational Programs Pet Food Bank Beulah Morgan Spay /Neuter Clinic Owner Requested Euthanasia & Cremations Contact: (509) 467 -5235 www.spol(anehumanesociety.org WIN Distributed free dog houses & pet food to hundreds of pet parents in need Numbers Gave out over 2,799 Spay/Neuter Vouchers Adopted 1,422 animals & Returned 1,035 animals to their pet parents Provided free training classes to over 500 pet parents Rescued hundreds of Animals from Cruelty and Neglect Transferred 1,806 animals to other adop- tion guaranteed facilities ® — — — — — — 11 m r-1 1 1, 11 The Evolution of SCRAPS )b Dylan said it so well "The Times They Are hanging" and these words hold true at :RAPS today... vas hired in 1986 as an animal protection offe- r and was promoted to director in 1995. At it time the animal protection officer was )wly emerging from the "dog catcher" of days ne by. Back in the day, SCRAPS was called iokane County Animal Control, there was no ch thing as a rescue group and our focus was •ictly on animal control /enforcement issues. )day, we work daily with rescue groups, have ofessional animal protection officers, offer ucational programs and promote adoptions all cause we care about the people and animals in r community. okane County focused on dog control as early the 1920's. I have a few bound log books in y office that contain the licensing records from is era. Naturally they are handwritten and the )st popular dog breed of the day is listed as a ur ", which I imagine is equivalent to today's mixed breed. SCRAPS originally was located off Trent near downtown Spokane. In 1975, SCRAPS relocated to our current site on Flora Road in the east valley area. Since that time the shelter has undergone a four phase remodeling project between 1996 and 2001 and has become a hub of activity for pets and people in our com- munity. SCRAPS has truly evolved from those days in the early 1920's and from my start here so long ago in 1986. We have a vision to become a true regional animal protection facility serving all citizens of Spokane County and to build a new regional animal center. It is our hope that one day we will win the war on animal cruelty, find homes for all the adoptable pets and to continue to be a gathering place that involves the commu- nity in helping both people and pets! Thank you for your continued support and best wishes in the New Year! 2 1 :5 l z v- � r CRAPS fifth annual Chocolate estival and Auction is coming p on April 23rd so save the ate! Ve have a few changes this ear. The SCRAPS Hope oundation is co- hosting the vent this year. You can pur- hase tickets at SCRAPS, by alling 477 -2760, or through the (CRAPS Hope Foundation web. ite: ✓ww. scrapshopefoundation, org ast click on the donate now but- Dn.. Tickets are $20 if purchased in advance and $25 at the door. age for attendees is 21 and over. There will be fabulous auction items, yummy choco- lates and light appetizers along with a cash bar serving beer and wine, "We are so excited for our Fifth annual Chocolate Festi- val," said Jackie Bell, SCRAPS Development Coor- dinator. "Last year our attendance doubled in size and we raised a re- cord amount of money for the ani- mals that SCRAPS care for." County spokesperson Martha Lou Wheatly - Billeter and County Com- missioner Todd Mielke will again help host this event. SCRAPS Hope Foundation and SCRAPS are accepting donations of goods and services for the auction. SCRAPS is also looking for a few great volunteers who are able to help promote the event, procure auction items and help during the event itself. www spokanecoun{y org /scraps 509:477.2532 2 21 North Flora Road; Spokane Palley, WA Page 2 Volume 3, Issue 1 Day n th e of Animal t I t i I Officer barriers for concerned citizens when it comes to reporting animal cruelty and neglect. I have been an Animal Protection Officer for six years. Lately it seems that the number of animal cruelty cases from starvation have increased. Just recently we have had starva- tion cases involving dogs, cats, horses, birds, chickens and rab- bits. I attribute the increase in cases to two things. First, people are facing a very difficult econ- omy. Second, there seems to be an increase in the number of peo- ple reporting these cases to SCRAPS. There is less tolerance for this type of abuse and neglect. There are still some imaginary First, all such reports can be confidential. Second, many people don't know who to call. If the cruelty or neglect is oc- curring within the Spokane city limits you should call SpokAnimal to report animal cruelty or abuse. Otherwise your first call can be to SCRAPS. The process of an animal cru- elty /neglect investigation is progressive. An initial first check on conditions begins the investigation. If there are no violations, APO's attempt to provide education to the pet's One of the joys that surrounds holi- day time at SCRAPS is the generous nature of our supporters. Many schools, groups and individuals owner. APO's also inform the owner of possible sources of assistance including local pet food banks. If there are violations, these may result in criminal charges which could result in the seizure of the animals and potentially criminal prosecution. If you suspect animal cruelty, abuse or neglect, please speak up for these animals that can't speak for themselves. You can call SCRAPS at 477 -2532 or SpokAnimal at 534- 8133. IM 14 MmIXI am, reach out to us and provide extra donations.of food, litter and money to get us through the holidays. A couple of many outstanding ex- amples was Adams Elementary who brought in 4 large bins full of food, toys and litter as well as $25.00 and the Pioneer School's kindergarten class came in for the 9th year in a row with lots of food! The entire class of 13 did chores at home and for each chore their parents bought dog food, then the school matched Ilb of food for each chore done. Also one of the joys I have as the Development Coordinator for Page 3 Houston" was recently res- cued by SCRAPS and was se- verely emaciated. Over the last twenty days he has gained over a pound a day and is still underweight. Charges are pending further investigation. SCRAPS is getting to meet the young children who have decided to find a way to give to the animals. A young gentleman by the name of Kody brought in $15 he had `collected' from his relatives at Christmas. A couple of sisters have sent in two donations, although small as far as monetary value goes, great as far as the knowledge that our youth have an amazing capacity for compassion. Thanks to everyone who gave to our animals this holiday season and throughout the year! The holidays at SCRAPS are always a mixture of joy and sadness. Joy to see animals getting homes for the holidays and sadness seeing more animals come in our doors. Page 4 m m � ! As we have closed out 2009, I want to thank all the volun- teers who do so much to enhance the lives of the animals who come into our shelter at SCRAPS. Whether you work, directly with the animals, or help our hard working and dedicated staff with cleaning, laundry, office work and more, your efforts are very much appreciated! I have met so many exceptional peo- ple this year! The dedication and love of animals is clearly demonstrated in everything the staff and volunteers do. Our volunteer program is constantly expanding and new volunteer oppor- tunities are always coming up. With our Dog Walking 101 classes in place, our volunteers are better able to take dogs in and out of kennels safely and enjoy a sociable walk with them. Our Adoption Counselor program is a great success based on comments from visitors who have worked with Adoption Counselors when deciding to adopt. SCRAPS did a lot of outreach this year and we will continue to have our once a month adoption outreach events at Petsmart. Photography is critical for adoptions and transport efforts. Volunteers are stepping up to photograph the animals so that we can continue to have them on Pet- findencom for the public to view. In addition, volunteers are now taking photos of newly impounded animals and posting them on SCRAPS web - site so that people who have lost an animal can see the animals we've taken in. Besides those things, there are lots of little things that make a huge differ- ence that our volunteers do daily. I can't imagine what SCRAPS would be like without all the time and effort our volunteers put in! So thank you again, to all you won- derful, dedicated animal loving peo- ple! Let's do it all again in the New Year! Francine Moniz. 1 � `£ £ Advice fronn A D og: Be loyal, Delight in the simple ' of a ion walk, Unleash you talents, Hide your favorite snack, ake new friends, Learn new tracks, no matter your a e, When loved ones come hone, always run to ::: -. greet t ewe Volume 3, Issue 1 Page 5 .© ............................................................................ ..............................® Did you know SCRAPS has leashes, collars, harnesses, Gentle Leaders, dog identification tags, and more available for sale in our lobby? All profits from these sales go directly to helping the ® animals. So next time before you buy, stop by SCRAPS and check out our wonderful selection! ...........................©......©.....................©...................... ............................... S Equine neglect and abuse has been going on for decades. However, with the recent downfall of the economy animal control agencies are receiving a higher number of complaints on neglected and/or abandoned horses. SCRAPS has handled several equine neglect cases this year, one of which they were able to get the owner to release two of the horses to them. SCRAPS is not set up to house large animals, so the two horses were kept at local veterinarian's facility. Not only is the shelter not capable of housing large animals, the funds to care for an equine(s) are extremely limited. Luckily, in 2008 SCRAPS became part of the "Hay for Horses" voucher program through Ripley's Horse Aid Foundation, a neglect prevention program used to assist good owners in bad situations get back on their feet and caring for their animals again by providing short term healthcare for their horses. It is also an effective tool for the officers at SCRAPS to make it very clear to the owner that they are responsible and need to take appropriate action to improve the situation for their animals. This program also gives SCRAPS an opportunity to have a greater impact on the future well being for equines in Spokane County. When an Animal Protection Officer issues a voucher to an owner, they can choose at their discretion from several different services to provide the owner with, de- pending on what is needed. Services per horse include no less than 300 pounds of hay (pellet feed may be substituted if needed), one bag of grain supplement, one farrier trim, castration, teeth float, and euthanasia and carcass removal. If the owner reduces their herd by half, they are able to qualify for another 600 pounds of hay and 2 bags of grain per equine left in the herd. The vouchers also serve as written documentation as evidence for SCRAPS if legal action is needed. Ripley's Horse Aid Foundation is a 501(c) (3) charity so funds for the "Hay for Horses" come from donations and grants. Once finds for the county have depleted, vouchers will no longer be available for use. SCRAPS has issued three vouchers since joining the program and needs your help to keep the program going in Spokane County. We are looking for a volunteer fundraising coor- dinator to help raise funds as well. The fundraising coordinator is responsible for creating fundrais- ing events as well as collecting volunteers for these events. Please contact Ashley Brown 509 -263- 8097 if you are interested in vol- unteering or for more information on the program. To report neglect in Spokane County please call SCRAPS 509- 477 -2532. http://w .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. ............................... A dog thinks: Hey, these people I live with feed me, love me, provide me with a nice warm, dry house, pet me, and take good care of me... They must be gods! A cat thinks: Hey, these people I live with feed me, love me, provide me with a nice warm, dry house, pet me, and take good care of me... I must be a god! Page 6 Cr eate o i I [ ] Memorials /Gift Memberships [ ] Payroll Deductions /Employer Matching Gifts � MAIL TO: 2521 N. Flora Road Spokane Valley WA 99216 OR go to www.spokanecounty.org /scraps � DON'T FORGET YOU CAN ALSO DONATE OITT -LINE BY GOING TO OUR WEDSITE! I I Volume 3, Issue 1 D O You K'now W E g Lvni , many other diseases that humans share, i.e. diabetes, adrenal disease, As a child, I remember accompany- ing my Mother to a doctor appoint- ment. Many years later, I still recall a statement the doctor made to my mum. "What you eat has nothing to do with your health." This statement couldn't be further from the truth! This same belief prevailed in the pet food industry until recent. What our pets eat does affect their well- being. Obvious you say? Not so. According to the US National Cancer Institute, approximately one million dogs develop cancer in the US EACH YEAR! In addition, our pets develop coronary disease). What's going on? Do you know the ingredients in your pet's food? If you see ingredients such as by- product, soy, corn gluten, glucose, BHT, to name a few, you should think seriously about upgrad- ing your pet's food. Better food does cost a bit more, however, in the short and long -term, the expense to maintain a healthy pet will be cheaper - your visits to the Vet will be fewer! The latest buzz word in the pet food industry today is "Low Glycemic Index." The glycemic index of a food measures the effects of carbohy- drates on blood sugar levels. Lower GI foods are the more desirable for better health. Most, but not all, low GI foods are fruits and vegetables. Simply google "low glycemic index foods" and you will find much infor- mation on this subject. Look for these low GI foods in your pet's food. If you have any questions about pet nutrition, stop by the Urban Canine! "SCRAPS Adopted Lab" This is to the person who had to give up their black lab to SCRAPS two years ago this month. His name on his cage was Domino (the shelter may have named him that). I have thought of you so many times. believe you had to give him up against your will for whatever reason, he's a great dog to just give up. I just want you to know he found another terrific home. We named him Hamilton and he's spoiled rot- ten!! He was picked out by my teenage daughter. He sleeps in her bed every night under her covers. He's inside a lot with us as he's family, not a pet. His favorite toy is the laser light or chasing a tennis ball. He still loves his car rides and walks like no one's business. He can't keep a tennis ball longer than a day cuz' if you remem- ber he chews and chews. I know he missed you for months after we adopted him, he looked at trucks hard and I think you lived in a second story apt as he went crazy trying to go upstairs like he knew it. Believe me when I say my heart goes out to you for doing something that was incredibly hard and painful, but please know that he is happy, loved and well cared for. I want to thank you for this wonderful dog, he has brought an infinite amount of joy to us. I praise you often for do- ing this labor of love. Thank you SCRAPS and all the other animal shel- ters, for being there for. the pets who have been surrendered. You give ani- mals a second chance to give and re- ceive joy. ' 2 No " 'h Flor Ro Sp j/�a11ey�11YA 99218 �w s okanecoun � or 1 �� w�� 5U9- 477.253' 2521 f � SPOKANE COUNTY REGIONAL ANIMAL PROTECTION SERVICE 2521 N. Flora Road Spokane Valley, WA 99216 PRSRT STD U.S. POSTAGE PAID SPOKANE, WA PERMIT NO. 1155 Return Service Requested Exhibit C addie's Data Collection Grant ANNUAL REPORT SUMMARY Animal Control & Traditional Shelters YEAR: 2009 P e r• R V 0- NAME OF ORGANIZATION: SCRAPS Year End 2009 Dog Cat Total A BEGINNING SHELTER COUNT: 01/01 12009 33 18 51 INTAKE (Live Dogs & Cats Only) From the Public Healthy 2476 3682 6158 Treatable — Rehabilitatable 0 0 b Treatable — Manageable 0 0 0 Unhealthy & Untreatable 0 0 0 B Subtotal Intake from the Public 2476 3682 6158 Incoming Transfers from Organizations within Community/Coalition Healthy 214 1 258 472 Treatable — Rehabilitatable 2 14 16 Treatable — Manageable 2 14 16 Unhealthy & Untreatable 0 8 8 C Subtotal Intake from Incoming Transfers from Orgs within Community/Coalition 218 294 512 Incoming Transfers from Organizations outside Community/Coalition Healthy 2 0 1 2 Treatable — Rehabilitatable 0 0 0 Treatable — Manageable 0 0 0 Unhealthy & Untreatable 0 0 0 D Subtotal Intake from Incoming Transfers from Orgs outside Community/Coalition 2 0 2 From Owners/Guardians Requesting Euthanasia Healthy 0 0 0 Treatable — Rehabilitatable 0 0 1 0 Treatable — Manageable 0 0 1 0 Unhealthy & Untreatable 183 109 292 E Subtotal. intake from Owners/Guardians Requesting Euthanasia 183 109 292 F Total Intake [B + C + D + E] 2879 4085 6964 G Owner /Guardian Requested Euthanasia (Unhealthy & Untreatable Only) 183 109 292 H ADJUSTED TOTAL INTAKE [F minus G] 2696 3976 6672 ADOPTIONS (only dogs and cats adopted by the public) Involving Dogs and Cats from Animal Control and Traditional Shelters Healthy 799 619 1418 Treatable — Rehabilitatable 0 0 0 Treatable — Manageable 3 0 3 Unhealthy & Untreatable 0 0 0 Subtotal Adoptions Involving Dogs and Cats from Animal Control 802 619 1421 Involving Dogs and Cats From the Public and Other Organizations Healthy 0 0 0 Treatable — Rehabilitatable 0 0 0 Treatable — Manageable 0 0 0 Unhealthy & Untreatable 0 0 0 Subtotal Adoptions Involving Dogs and Cats From the Public and Other Organizations 0 0 0 1 TOTAL ADOPTIONS 802 619 1421 OUTGOING TRANSFERS to Organizations within Community/Coalition Healthy 386 733 1119 Treatable — Rehabilitatable 11 21 32 Treatable — Manageable 8 11 19 Unhealthy & Untreatable 0 0 0 J TOTAL OUTGOING TRANSFERS to Orgs within Community /Coalition 405 765 1170 OUTGOING TRANSFERS to Organizations outside CommuniVCoalifion Healthy 185 430 615 Treatable — Rehabilitatable 7 3 10 Treatable — Manageable 10 1 11 Unhealthy & Untreatable 0 0 0 K ITOTAL OUTGOING TRANSFERS to Orgs outs /de Community /Coalition 202 434 636 Exhibit C L RETURN TO OWNER/GUARDIAN 945 91 1036 DOGS & CATS EUTHANIZED M Healthy (Includes Owner /Guardian Requested Euthanasia) 66 557 623 N Treatable - Rehabilitatable (Includes Owner /Guardian Requested Euthanasia) 97 365 462 0 Treatable - Manageable (Includes OwnerIGuardian Requested Euthanasia) 42 224 266 P Unhealthy & Untreatable (Includes OwnerIGuardian Requested Euthanasia) 340 1007 1347 Q Total Euthanasia [M + N + 0 + Pi 545 2153 2698 R Owner /Guardian Requested Euthanasia (Unhealthy & Untreatable Only) 183 109 292 S ADJUSTED TOTAL EUTHANASIA 10 minus R] 362 2044 2406 T SUBTOTAL OUTCOMES [I + J + K + L + S] Excludes OwnerIGuardian Requested Euthanasia (Unhealthy & Untreatable Only) 2716 1 3953 1 6669 U DIED OR LOST IN SHELTER/CARE 4 11 15 V TOTAL OUTCOMES [T + U] Excludes OwnerIGuardian Requested Euthanasia (Unhealthy & Untreatable Only) 2720 3964 6684 W JENDING SHELTER COUNT: 12/31/2009 9 30 39 In a perfect world, the Ending Count is equal to the Beginning Count (A) plus Total Intake (F) minus all Outcomes (R +V). - - - -> 9 30 39 If your reported Ending Count does not match these numbers, please go back through your data and be sure you didn't miss something (i.e., animals in foster, adoptions, transfers, etc.). If all animals have been accounted for and the reported Ending Count is different, please indicate in the comment section. Comments: I agree that in completing this form, we have used the Maddie's Fund definitions of "Healthy," "Treatable - Manageable," "Treatable - Rehabilitatable," and "Unhealthy & Untreatable" as set forth in the attached document titled, " Maddie's Fund® Categorizations /Definitions of Shelter Animals." Signature: Dianne Timoney Date: 03/17/2010 Exhibit C Maddie °s Data Collection Grant MONTHLY REPORTING FORAM Adoption Guarantee Organizations YEAR: 2009 P pDip . g s m a A udry O NAME OF ORGANIZATION: SpokAnimal C.A.R.E. Annual Dog Cat Total A BEGINNING SHELTER COUNT 37 35 72 INTAKE (Live Dogs & Cats Only) From the Public Healthy 2175 2064 4239 Treatable — Rehabilitatable 168 1367 1535 Treatable — Manageable 511 774 1285 Unhealthy & Untreatable 142 623 765 B Subtotal Intake from the Public 2996 4828 7824 Incoming Transfers from Organizations within Community/Coalition Healthy 75 61 136 Treatable — Rehabilitatable 57 43 1 100 Treatable — Manageable 3 17 1 20 Unhealthy & Untreatable 1 27 28 C Subtotal Intake from Incoming Transfers from Orgs within Community /Coalition 136 148 284 Incoming Transfers from Organizations outside Community /Coalition Healthy 5 0 5 Treatable — Rehabilitatable 0 0 0 Treatable — Manageable 11 0 11 Unhealthy & Untreatable 0 0 0 D Subtotal Intake from Incoming Transfers from Orgs outside Community /Coalition 16 0 16 From Owners/Guardlans Requesting Euthanasia Healthy 0 0 0 Treatable — Rehabilitatable 0 0 0 Treatable — Manageable 0 0 0 Unhealthy & Untreatable 0 0 0 E ISubtotal Intake from Owners /Guardians Requesting Euthanasia 0 0 1 0 F Total Intake [B + C + D + E) 3148 4976 8124 G Owner /Guardian Requested Euthanasia (Unhealthy & Untreatable Only) 0 0 0 H ADJUSTED TOTAL INTAKE [F minus G) 3148 4976 8124 ADOPTIONS (only dogs and cats adopted by the public) Involving Dogs and Cats from Animal Control and Traditional Shelters Healthy 767 928 1695 Treatable — Rehabilitatable 196 312 508 Treatable — Manageable 12 14 26 Unhealthy & Untreatable 3 11 14 Subtotal Adoptions Involving Dogs and Cats from Animal Control 978 1265 2243 Involving Dogs and Cats From the Public and Other Organizations Healthy 0 0 1 0 Treatable — Rehabilitatable 0 0 0 Treatable — Manageable 0 0 0 Unhealthy & Untreatable 0 0 0 Subtotal Adoptions Involving Dogs and Cats From the Public and Other Organizations 0 0 0 1 TOTAL ADOPTIONS 978 1265 2243 OUTGOING TRANSFERS to Organizations within Community /Coalition Healthy 76 96 172 Treatable — Rehabilitatable 61 128 189 Treatable — Manageable 14 8 22 Unhealthy & Untreatable 2 1 3 J ITOTAL OUTGOING TRANSFERS to Orgs within Community /Coalition 153 233 386 OUTGOING TRANSFERS to Organizations outside Community /Coalition Healthy 24 29 53 Treatable — Rehabilltatable 13 21 34 Treatable — Manageable 12 0 12 Unhealthy & Untreatable 2 4 6 K ITOTAL OUTGOING TRANSFERS to Orgs outside Community/Coalition 51 54 105 Exhibit C L RETURN TO OWNER/GUARDIAN 1297 63 1360 DOGS & CATS EUTHANIZED M Healthy (Includes Owner /Guardian Requested Euthanasia) 0 187 187 N Treatable— Rehabilitatabie (Includes Owner /Guardian Requested Euthanasia) 47 1525 1572 O Treatable— Manageable (Includes OwnerlGuardian Requested Euthanasia) 483 678 1161 P Unhealthy & Untreatable (Includes OwnedGuardian Requested Euthanasia) 132 947 1079 O Total Euthanasia [M + N + O + P) 662 3337 3999 R Owner /Guardian Requested Euthanasia (Unhealthy & Untreatable Onl 0 0 0 S ADJUSTED TOTAL EUTHANASIA [O minus R] 662 3337 3999 T SUBTOTAL OUTCOMES [I + J + K + L + S] Excludes Owner /Guardian Requested Euthanasia (Unhealthy & Untreatable Only) 3141 4952 8093 U DIED OR LOST IN SHELTERICARE 7 18 25 V TOTAL OUTCOMES [T + U] Excludes Owner /Guardian Requested Euthanasia (Unhealthy & Untreatable Only) 3148 4970 8118 W ENDING SHELTER COUNT: December 31, 2009 37 41 78 SCRAPS Four June 11, 2010 9:30 AM Tour of SCRAPS facility 10:15 Discussion — Regional Animal Control 11:30 Adjourn Light refreshments will be served. Refreshments are provided by the SCRAPS Hope Foundation. Directions: SCRAPS is located in the Spokane Valley: Take I -90 to the Sullivan exit and go north on Sullivan one mile, turn right on Euclid and go one mile to Flora, turn right on Flora and SCRAPS is located just across the RR Tracks at 2521 N Flora Road. F { i V f l SPOKW Cowls NANCY HILL SPOKANE COUNTY REGIONAL ANIMAL. PROTECTION SERVICE - SCRAPS DIRECTOR 2521 NORTH FLORA ROAD SPOKANE VALLEY, WA 99216 PHONE: (509) 477 -1967 FAx: (509) 477 -4745 NHILL°@SPOKANECOUNTY.ORG W W W. SPOKANECO UNTY.ORGIANIMAL SCRAPS Mission: Building a more humane community, protecting public safety and ensuring animal welfare through compassionate, responsive, professional enforcement of laws and public policy. CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: June 29, 2010 City Manager Sign -off: Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ® information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Council request for signing analysis GOVERNING LEGISLATION: N/A PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: None BACKGROUND: A request was made at the 4/13/2010 City Council meeting for staff to research options for installing business signage at the Sprague Avenue eastbound exit from 1 -90. Jurisdiction over 1 -90 Signage All signage on 1 -90 is under the authority of the Washington Department of Transportation ( WSDOT) and is governed by regulations set forth in the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices ( MUTCD), the Revised Code of Washington, and the WSDOT Traffic Manual. City staff worked with WSDOT's Eastern Region Traffic Office to prepare this document. Overview of Guide Signaqe Guide signs provide information about route designations, distances and directions to destinations, motorist services, and other geographical, recreational, or cultural points of interest. Guide sign backgrounds can be blue, green, or brown. Pursuant to the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices ( MUTCD) sign messages that provide advertising or commercial information are not allowed. The MUTCD states that "Traffic control devices or their supports shall not bear any advertising message or any other message that is not related to traffic control ". The WSDOT Traffic Manual also states that guide signs on freeways must be spaced at least 800 feet apart. Limiting the number and spacing of guide signs allows the driver adequate time to read and respond to the messages. Existing 1 -90 Signaqe In addition to the exit name signs, Spokane Valley has the following signs on 1 -90. • Eastbound near Havana "Entering City of Spokane Valley" • Westbound approaching Barker "Entering City of Spokane Valley" • "Spokane Valley Mall Next Exit" • "Spokane Industrial Park Next Exit" • "Spokane Valley Heritage Museum Next Exit" • "Spokane County Fair and Expo Center Next Exit" • Blue Motorist Service signs with restaurants, gas stations, lodging, camping, RV park, hospital, and visitor information listed on the approaches to Spokane Valley interchanges. Priority of Guide Sign Installation The two categories of guide signs recognized by WSDOT are Primary and Supplemental. Primary Guide signs provide guidance to destinations served by upcoming exits or intersections such as "EXIT 286 Broadway Ave" or "Millwood NEXT EXIT ". Examples of the supplemental guide signs would be those posted for the Spokane Valley Heritage Museum or the Spokane Industrial Park. Primary guide signs will always be prioritized above supplemental guide signs. Some supplemental guide signs such as state parks within 15 miles of interstate highways and regional shopping centers meeting specific criteria will take precedence over other types of supplemental signage per RCW 47.36.290 and RCW 47.36.270. The table below shows other guide signs that may be allowed if specific conditions are met and space allows. In general with a few exceptions, the state does not provide signage to ventures operated by private entities for profit, and other areas or ventures not of general interest to the traveling public are not permitted on state highways. Allowable Supplemental Guide Signs* Allowable with conditions Typically not allowed State Parks TV radio Stations Regional Shopping Centers (500,000+ sq. ft.) Theaters Airports Cemeteries Amtrak station Libraries Ferries Churches Park and Ride lots Subdivisions Natural /Cultural /Historic Attractions County facilities Scenic Byways Courthouses Event Venues (annual attendance 300,000 +) Vehicle Emissions Testing National Parks Highway Buildings Recreational Areas Jails /Prisons Colleges /Universities Civil Defense Facilities US Forest Service facilities Mental Facilities Business Routes Research Facilities Ports /Port Districts Sanitariums Industrial Parks (500,000+ sq. ft.) Nursing Homes /Retirement Facilities City Center Tree Nurseries /Arboretums *This list was compiled from the text of the WSDOT Traffic Manual. It does not include all allowable signs. Analysis of Signs Proposed The following signs were suggested as options for staff to explore. They have been evaluated against the criteria in the WSDOT Traffic Manual Section 2.4D (see attachment). "Business District" — This message is not listed as an allowable sign in the WSDOT Traffic Manual. "Auto Row" — This message is not listed as an allowable sign in the WSDOT Traffic Manual. "University City" — Would not be allowed as the shopping center would not meet the criteria outlined in RCW 47.36.370 (see attachment). There are several criteria that must be met, which include being no more than 1 mile from the state highway, having three or more major department stores, having 500,000 sq. ft. of leasable retail space, and attracting 9,000 daily trips to the center. Other Signing Options There are three other options that may be suitable for this corridor. Business Route — A business route can direct motorists to alternate routes passing through the business portion of a city or through districts of continuous business development. The routes were developed as construction of the interstate bypassed many businesses. Sprague Avenue was signed as an 1 -90 Business Route from the 1960's through the 1980's. It is not known why the designation was removed. Use of businesses routes has been declining in recent years and may not be appropriate for the Sprague corridor due to its length and because Spokane Valley has several business areas. Proposals for business routes must be approved by the American Association of State Highway Officials, the Federal Highway Administration and WSDOT headquarters. It is likely that the City would be asked to pay part of the cost of the signage. The most appropriate route for 1 -90 Business Route designation would be Sprague and Appleway from Exit 285 (Sprague Avenue) to Exit 294 (Appleway- CountryVista) in Liberty Lake. 2. City Center — WSDOT has historically provided "City Center" signs for the purpose of directing motorists to local government buildings (i.e. City Hall, Courthouse, etc.). This requires a description of where the city center exists within the corporate limits and also verification that representatives of local government and area chamber of commerce agree on the location of the city center. 3. Sprague Exit - Change Sprague Avenue exit signs to include both Sprague Avenue and Appleway Avenue. This may help to raise awareness of the location of the Appleway corridor and help businesses that have "Appleway" integrated into their name. Updating of freeway signage is typically included in larger paving projects, and in that case would be funded by WSDOT. But since they are currently not planning any work on that part of 1 -90, any desire to change the signage in the near term would need to be paid for by the City. The existing signs could be switched from Sprague to Appleway for around $10,000. Inclusion of both street names would require larger signs and replacement of several cantilever sign supports, which would be much more costly. OPTIONS: Please let us know if you have questions or would like additional information. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: None. BUDGET /FINANCIAL IMPACTS: None. STAFF CONTACT: Neil Kersten, Public Works Director; Inga Note, Senior Traffic Engineer ATTACHMENTS: Applicable RCWs and WACs RCW 47.36.290 State park directional signs. Directional signs for state parks within fifteen miles of an interstate highway shall be erected and maintained on the interstate highway by the department despite the existence of additional directional signs on primary or scenic system highways in closer proximity to such state parks. RCW 4736.270 Regional shopping center directional signs. Regional shopping center directional signs shall be erected and maintained on state highway right -of- way if they meet each of the following criteria: (1) There shall be at least five hundred thousand square feet of retail floor space available for lease at the regional shopping center; (2) The regional shopping center shall contain at least three major department stores that are owned by a national or regional retail chain organization; (3) The shopping center shall be located within one mile of the roadway; (4) The center shall generate at least nine thousand daily one -way vehicle trips to the center; (5) There is sufficient space available for installation of the directional sign as specified in the Manual On Uniform Traffic Control Devices; (6) Supplemental follow- through directional signing is required at key decision points to direct motorists to the shopping center if it is not clearly visible from the point of exit from the main traveled way. The department shall collect from the regional shopping center a reasonable fee based upon the cost of erection and maintenance of the directional sign. WAC 468 -95 -140 Signing to regional shopping centers. Pursuant to RCW 47.36.270 a regional shopping center may be signed as a supplemental guide sign destination from state highways in accordance with the applicable sections of MUTCD Part II -D, Guide Signs - Conventional Roads, and MUTCD Part II -E Guide Signs - Freeways and Expressways, and in accordance with subsections (1) through (8) of this section. (1) There shall be at least 500,000 square feet of leasable retail floor space; (2) There shall be at least three major department stores owned by national or regional retail chain organizations; (3) The center shall be located within one highway mile of the state highway; (4) The center shall generate at least 9,000 daily one -way vehicle trips to the center; (5) Sufficient sign space as specified in the MUTCD shall be available for installation; (6) Supplemental follow- through directional signing is required on county roads or city streets at key motorist decision points, if the center is not clearly visible from the point of exit from the state highway. The required supplemental follow- through directional signs shall be installed by the city or county prior to the installation of signs on the state highway; (7) Signing on the state highway to a county road or city street that bears the name of the regional shopping center fulfills the statutory requirements for signing to those centers; (8) The costs of materials and labor for fabricating, installing, and maintaining regional shopping center signs shall be borne by the center. CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: June 29, 2010 City Manager Sign -off: Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ® information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Response to Allan Hinkle's Comments GOVERNING LEGISLATION: PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Approval of the 3 -lane conversion of Broadway Avenue — Pines Rd to Sullivan Rd as part of the Broadway Avenue Overlay Project; Discussion of preliminary collision data on Broadway Ave between Pines Road and Sullivan Road on April 29, 2008 and June 16, 2009; Approval of the 2010 -2015 Six Year Transportation Improvement Plan on June 16, 2009, which included the Broadway Avenue Safety Project - Park to Pines; Approval of the 2010 Annual Budget; Approval of the Amended 2010 Transportation Improvement Plan on April 13, 2010. BACKGROUND: At the May 25, 2010 Council meeting, Dr. Allan Hinkle presented a letter dated 13 May 2010 with comments and questions for staff. This RCA responds to those comments and questions. In 2006, the City of Spokane Valley applied for a FY2008 grant from the Washington State Transportation Improvement Board (TIB) in the amount of $746,280 for improvements to Broadway Avenue between Park Road and Pines Road. The estimate prepared and submitted with the grant application is attached. Design on the project has been suspended, and not enough design has been completed to update and refine the estimate. When staff spoke with Dr. Hinkle the afternoon of May 25, it was understood that his request for costs was for the traffic devices discussed, not everything in the attached estimate. A copy of the grant application estimate was provided to Dr. Hinkle on May 27th. OPTIONS: Information only. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Information only. BUDGET /FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Total project estimate is $932,850; 80% ($746,280) to be paid with a state TIB grant, 20% ($186,570) to be paid with local matching funds. Total design estimate is $113,000, with approximately $45,000 spent to date in consultant work and staff time. STAFF CONTACT: Ken Knutson, Project Engineer Steve Worley, Senior Capital Projects Engineer ATTACHMENTS Project estimate submitted with grant application Project Hanna: Broadway Safety Project, Pines Rd, to Park Rd. UHROF MEASURE 3-Lane striping, bike Tana% ADA upgrades, 3.0 mi lmpa d By: Bryan D. Hicks, A.E. Eha ked By: Louis Graf, P.E. Preparation Dare: August 30th, 2006 #o ne Valley mg rTEM DESERIPT7PN UHROF MEASURE PUUlNED 4UANTTfY ESTL4ATED LUT PRICE F$Ti SATED TrEU PRIES 1 MOBILIZATION L.S. 1 $ 31 000.00 S 31 DOG 2 REMOVAL OF PAINT STRIPING L.S. 1 S 50 000.00 S 50 OOG 3 LABOR FORTRAFFICCONTROL HR. 1,000 S 42.00 $ 42000 4 TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES L.S. 1 S 10,000.00 S 10,000 5 CONSTRUCTION SIGNS CLASS S.F. 1,200 $ 8.00 S 9,600 6 CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE TN 400 $ 35.00 S 14,000 7 PLANING BITUM1ROUSPAVEMFNT S.Y. 1 2.50 $ 4 8 RETROFIT TRUNC. DOME AT SIOMALK RAMPS E4 10 $ 45.00 $ 450 9 REMOVE FXISTING SIDEWWALKIDRNEWAYAPPROAC SY 1,000 $ 750 $ 7,500 10 CEMENT CONC. SIDEWALK S.Y. 400 S 50.00 $ 20 000 11 REINFORCED CEMENT CONC. DRNEWAY APPROAC S.Y. 200 $ 60.00 S 12 12 CEMENT CONCRcTE TRAFFIC ISLAND SY 100 S 750 0 S 7.5o0 13 CEMENT CONC. SIDEWALK RAMP TYPE 2A EA 60 $ 850.D0 $ 51,000 A CEMENT CONC. SIDEWALK RAMP TYPE 3A EA 20 $ 1,000.00 S 20,000 15 CEMENT CONC. SIDEWALK RAMP TYPE 413 EA 10 $ 1,100,00 5 11,000 16 CEMENT CONC. TRAFFIC CURB 6D6 S 20.00 S 12.000 17 CEMENT CONC. PEDESTRIAN CURB 600 $ 18.00 S 10 80G 18 CEMENT CONC. CURB WALL -1210 18 EXPOSURE EU. 200 $ 45.00 S 9,000 19 HMA CL. A, 0.17 FT. DEPTH 1,750 $ 10.00 S 17.500 20 RELOCATE EXISTING FENCE LF 500 S 25.00 $ 12 500 21 PLASTIC CROSSWALK LINE S.F. 1700 S 5.00 $ 8 500 22 PLASTIC TRAFFIC STRIPE L.F. 33,800 $ 0.65 S 21,970 23 PLASTIC WIDE TRAFFIC STRIPE L.F. 32 $ 1.80 S 59,D40 24 PLASTIC STOP LINE LF 220 S 8,50 $ 1 870 25 PLASTIC TRAFFIC ARROW PA 56 75.00 $ 4,200 26 TEMPORARY PAVEMENT STRIPZ LF 32 800 $ 010 S 3 27 TEMPORARY TRAFFIC ARROW EA 40 $ 50.00 S 2 28 34N PVC CONDUIT WITH FIBER OPTIC CABLE LF 200 $ ' 30.00 $ 6.000 29 INDUCTION LOOP VEHICLE DETECTOR EA 70 $ 750.00 $ 52,500 30 OPTICAL VEHICLE DETECTOR EA 2 S 25 000,00 $ 60 31 TRAFFIC SIGNAL CONTROLLER MODIFICATIONS FA 7 S 5,000.00 $ 35 32 TRAFFIC SIGNAL PHASING MODIFICATIONS LS 1 $ 10,000.D0 $ 10 000 33 LICENSED SURVEYING LS 1 $ 10.000.00 S 10 34 PROJECT SIGN EA 21$ 500.00 $ 1,000 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATE 617,685 PE (12 %) Cont €ngency(20 %) CE (15 %) RightOfWay TOTAL PROJECT ESTIMATE an EX Hicks, P.. WA# 37448 V " 3 09 0 y U �Jp f 123,6iT� ' 1 [9 1 � $ $ 92,638 S 26,000 1' $ 932,850 "I pt"I')N 1 d_ i 10& j lJ� -ail ✓ y V " 3 09 0 y U �Jp f 123,6iT� ' 1 [9 1 � $ $ 92,638 S 26,000 $ 932,850 "I pt"I')N 1 d_ i 10& j lJ� -ail 11707 E Sprague Ave Suite 106 ♦ Spokane Valley WA 99206 509.921.1000 ♦ Fax: 509.921.1008 ♦ cityhall@spokanevalley.org Financial reports Reports showing a comparison of actual revenues and expenditures at May 31, 2010, to the 2010 Budget, are attached. Gambling tax receipts are expected to have a large uncollectible portion, as casinos struggle to make ends meet. Investment earnings are likely to be less than projected in our 2010 budget as interest rates are down dramatically from prior years. Sales tax receipts are down 2.6% from 2009 collections which is the smallest decrease in a year and a half. Since we estimate our revenues conservatively (we always exceed our revenue estimates) and our expenditures are usually less than our estimates, moderate changes in revenues and expenditures have very little affect on our operations. This approach provides a smooth, "steady as you go" financial foundation for our operations. Beginning Fund Balance in the General Fund will be greater than our estimates. The investment report is also attached for your review. The Risk Management Fund Budget will need to be amended during the year as the cost of our insurance was greater ($35,000) than the amount budgeted. Other amendments may include the cost of broadcasting council meetings and the city's share of the collaborative planning grant. Both programs were approved at recent council meetings. Staff preparing 2009 financial records Staff has started the process to ready 2009 financial records for the audit in 2010. We expect the State Auditor's Office to arrive on June 17, to begin the audit. Other tasks +A property tax reduction is being examined +Possible amendments to the 2010 are being reviewed. +Plans are being prepared for the preparation of the 2011 Budget which will include potential 3, 6 and 9% reductions. City of Spokane Valley General Fund Budget Variance Report For the Period Ended May 31, 2010 General Fund Revenues: Begining Fund Balance Property Tax Sales Tax Gambling Tax Franchise Fees /Business Licenses State Shared Revenues Planning & Building Fees Fines and Forfeitures Recreation & Centerplace Fees Investment Interest Operating Transfers Total General Fund Revenues General Fund Expenditures: Legislative Branch Executive & Legislative Support Public Safety Operations & Administrative Svcs Public Works Planning & Community Dev. Library Services Parks & Recreation General Government Total General Fund Expenditures Adopted Budget May YTD Unrealized Percent 2010 Revenues Revenues Revenue Realized $ 19,375,000 21,388 19,375,000 $ - 100.00% 6 10,969,500 4,373,396 4,962,514 6,006,986 45.24% 5 16,600,000 1,349,759 5,301,794 11,298,206 31.94% 425,000 7,835 180,916 244,084 42.57% 12 1,100,000 6,950 282,634 817,366 25.69% 12 1,450,000 1,992 545,719 904,281 37.64% 1,649,786 309,111 693,983 955,803 42.07% 1,594,700 168,030 755,101 839,599 47.35% 740,000 56,897 291,635 448,365 39.41% 416,864 11,491 56,980 359,884 13.67% 220,000 - - 220,000 0.00% 17 $ 54,540,850 6,285,460 32,446,278 $ 22,094,572 59.49% Adopted Budget May YTD Unrealized Percent 2010 Expenditures Expenditures Expenditures Realized 322,120 21,388 155,502 166,618 48.27% 1,063,842 81,313 757,590 306,252 71.21% 22,062,268 483,601 6,686,918 15,375,350 30.31% 1,892,382 120,294 615,973 1,276,409 32.55% 893,793 54,129 278,686 615,107 31.18% 3,552,450 244,241 1,223,195 2,329,255 34.43% - 180 180 (180) 2,926,033 84,895 668,103 2,257,930 22.83% 21,827,963 64,041 693,908 21,134,055 3.18% 18 $ 54,540,851 $ 1,154,082 $ 11,080,056 $ 43,460,795 20.32% 06/22/2010 1:48 PM City of Spokane Valley Other Funds Budget Variance Report For the period ended May 31, 2010 Other Funds Revenues: Street Fund Trails and Paths Hotel /Motel Fund Civic Facilities Replacement Debt Service - LTGO 03 Capital Projects Fund Special Capital Projects Fund Street Capital Projects Mirabeau Point Project Community Developmt Block Grnts Capital Grants Fund Barker Bridge Reconstruction Stormwater Mgmt Fund Equip. Rental & Replacement Risk Management Reserves: Centerplace Operating Service Level Stabilization Winter Weather Parks Capital Civic Buildings Total Other Funds Revenues: Other Funds Expenditures: Street Fund Trails and Paths Hotel /Motel Fund Civic Facilities Replacement Debt Service LTGO 03 Capital Projects Fund Special Capital Projects Fund Street Capital Projects Mirabeau Point Project Community Developmt Block Grnts Capital Grants Fund Barker Bridge Reconstruction Stormwater Mgmt Fund Equip. Rental & Replacemnt Risk Management Reserves: Centerplace Operating Service Level Stabilization Winter Weather Parks Capital Civic Facilities Capital Total Other Funds Expenditures Adopted Budget May YTD Unrealized Percent 2010 Revenues Revenues Revenue Realized $ 7,399,050 $ 417,203 $ 1,636,834 5,762,216 22.12% 8 8,000 4 22 7,978 0.27% 3 400,000 39,544 110,222 289,778 27.56% 1,240,000 244 721 1,239,279 0.06% 16 650,000 155,760 155,760 494,240 23.96% 2 1,948,000 50,005 156,257 1,791,743 8.02% 3 612,000 50,193 156,428 455,572 25.56% 3 10,572,000 98,939 259,946 10,312,054 2.46% 3 - 3 (142) 142 4 300,000 - - 300,000 0.00% 14 2,465,000 40,454 96,278 2,368,722 3.91% 3 1,767,000 93,977 196,170 1,570,830 11.10% 4,398,015 651,398 763,753 3,634,262 17.37% 8 919,000 181 852 918,148 0.09% 8 258,000 3 258,017 (17) 100.01% 350,000 65 360 349,640 0.10% 7 5,400,000 1,090 5,657 5,394,343 0.10% 7 505,000 101 101 504,899 0.02% 13 820,000 228 344 819,656 0.04% 3 5,827,000 1,172 6,084 5,820,916 0.10% 7 $ 45.838.065 $ 1.600.564 $ 3.803.665 42.034.400 8.30% Adopted Budget May YTD Unrealized Percent 2010 Expenditures Expenditures Expenditures Realized $ 7,399,050 243,651 892,943 $ 6,506,107 12.07% 18 8,000 - - 8,000 0.00% 3 400,000 12,274 116,607 283,394 29.15% 1 1,240,000 - - 1,240,000 0.00% 16 650,000 - (50,419) 700,419 -7.76% 2 1,948,000 - - 1,948,000 0.00% 3 612,000 - - 612,000 0.00% 3 10,572,000 379,086 569,099 10,002,901 5.38% 3 - - - - 4 300,000 - - 300,000 0.00% 14 2,465,000 18,043 181,577 2,283,423 7.37% 3 1,767,000 101,026 246,215 1,520,785 13.93% 4,398,015 166,505 455,377 3,942,638 10.35% 18 919,000 - - 919,000 0.00% 9 258,000 - 292,633 (34,633) 113.42% 15 350,000 - - 350,000 0.00% 10 5,400,000 - - 5,400,000 0.00% 13 505,000 - - 505,000 0.00% 13 820,000 52,927 123,998 696,002 15.12% 3 5,827,000 - 17,866 5,809,134 031% 3 $ 45.838.065 $ 973.512 2.845.897 $ 42.992.168 621% 06/22/2010 1:48 PM City of Spokane Valley Investment Report For the Month of May 2010 Balances by Fund 001 General Fund $ 24,537,650.52 101 Street Fund Total 102 Arterial Street LGIP* Moiuntain West MM ** BB CD Investments Beginning $ 40,138,814.56 $ 365.96 $ 2,035,657.54 $ 42,174,838.06 Deposits 6,559,492.80 - - $ 6,559,492.80 Withdrawls - (366.15) - $ (366.15) Interest 9,836.95 0.19 - $ 9,837.14 Ending $ 46,708,144.31 $ 0.00 $ 2,035,657.54 $ 48,743,801.85 Balances by Fund 001 General Fund $ 24,537,650.52 101 Street Fund 2,467,803.09 102 Arterial Street - 103 Trails & Paths 20,815.30 105 Hotel /Motel 396,457.56 120 CenterPlace Operating Reserve 324,408.43 121 Service Level Stabilization Reserve 5,401,351.83 122 Winter Weather Reserve 500,100.92 123 Civic Facilities Replacement 1,208,494.25 301 Capital Projects 1,245,942.56 302 Special Capital Projects 2,176,618.71 304 Mirabeau Point Project 15,148.69 309 Parks Capital Project 1,130,500.72 310 Civic Buildings Capital Projects 5,809,306.84 402 Stormwater Management 2,598,815.58 501 Equipment Rental & Replacement 894,640.98 502 Risk Management 15,745.87 $ 48,743,801.85 *Local Government Investment Pool * *Account closed in May City of Spokane Valley Sales Tax Receipts Month by Month Comparison Month Received 2009 February $ 1,690,170.61 March 1,245,885.86 April 1,210,210.64 May 1,297, 589.85 June 1,254, 330.03 July 1,312,964.99 August 1,494,486.56 September 1,381,203.54 October 1,393,353.36 November 1,417,465.22 December 1,314,434.56 January 2010 1,221,873.05 2011 $ 16,233,968.27 2010 $ 1,693,974.29 1,097,126.08 1,160, 934.77 1,349,758.63 $ 5,301,793.77 Year to date Percentage Change 0.23% -4.94% 19 -4.68% 19 -2.61% 1 0 :• 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Most costs are typically late in the year. Debt paid twice each year (June and December.) At 3 -31 -10 reversal of accrual. Capital projects often take a number of years to plan, engineer, acquire right of way and construct. For Discovery Park. Most property tax received in May and June. Estimated, pending 09 review. Interest earnings. Beg. Bal. included which understates percent realized. For replacement of vehicles & computers. Required operating reserve, no expenditures planned for 2010. Revenue for 2010 events will be moved to 2010. Quarterly Payment to City. Emergency use only. Fund being phased out. Budget adjustment needed In reserve for replacement of buildings. Transfers pending. Includes projected balances at 12- 31 -10, which understates percent realized. March and April 2010 reports contained calculation error which has been corrected. 06/22/2010 1:48 PM Spokane , ,;Oo* Valley PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT May 2010 AGREEMENTS FOR SERVICES ADOPTED AND IN OPERATION • Street Maintenance — 2010 Signal, Sign & Striping County Interlocal • Street Sweeping — AAA sweeping • Street and Stormwater Maintenance and Repair contract —Poe Asphalt Paving Inc. • Vactoring Contract — AAA Sweeping • Engineering Services Support — Agreements with private engineering firms • Street Maintenance (Pines & Trent) — WSDOT Interlocal • Solid Waste - Regional Solid Waste Interlocal • Winter operations — Snow Removal — Poe Asphalt • Landscaping Contract — Spokane ProCare • Emergency After Hours Call -out — Senske • Litter and Weed Control — Spokane County Geiger Work Crew WASTEWATER • Status of the process can be monitored at: http: / /www.spokaneriver.net/ http: / /www.ecy.wa.gov /programs /wq /tmdl /spokaneriver /dissolved oxygen /status.html http: / /www.spokanecounty.org/ utilities/ WaterReclamation /content.aspx ?c =2224 and http://www.spokaneriverpartners.com/ REGIONAL SOLID WASTE SYSTEM Solid Waste Liaison Board will be discussing Regional Governance issues over the next several months. STREET MASTER PLAN • Received all updated traffic counts and accident data from JUB. Need to evaluate for future projects and present to council with an update on pavement management. STORM WATER • SW Improvement Projects 1. Robinhood Street, 1300 — 1400 Block: add capture, catchbasins, and expand UIC for under - designed area. Met with consultant to wrap up construction documents. 2. Herald Street, 8 th to 9 1h Ave.: add capture, catchbasins, and expand existing UIC. Met with consultant to wrap up construction documents. 3. Oberlin Street, South of 11 Avenue: additional stormwater capture and swale. Met with consultant to wrap up construction documents. 4. 10 Avenue, Little John Ct. to Mariam St: additional stormwater capture, manhole structure. Met with consultant to wrap up construction documents. 1 updated May 18, 2010 5. University and 16 ", NE Corner: replace (2) existing UIC's, provide overflow to 16 Ave system. Construction scheduled for late June%arly July. 6. 43r Hollow and Forest Meadows: repair of crushed culvert pipe. COMPLETED. 7. Union, North of Mission: added capture of stormwater. Rescheduling construction for late June%arly July. 8. 550 S. Sullivan Road: increase intercept of stormwater before existing drywell. Construction scheduled for late June%arly July. 9. 2316 N. Girrard: replace existing failing pipe sump with catchbasin and single depth drywell. COMPLETED. 10. Yardley Area Drywell Rim Grouting: Repair Rims. COMPLETED. 11. Woodruff and Holman: Lower existing grades and piping. Monitoring improvements made with sewer project summer 2009 — additional improvements On Hold. 12. 5700 E. 8 new intercept and swale with drywell. Scheduled for Construction May. 13. 11 and Herald — improve catchbasins and rehabilitate existing failing UIC. Scheduled for design this summer with construction Fall 2010. • 2010 County Sewer Projects — Continued work with County Sewer Projects for 2010 — suggested stormwater funded improvements in the West Farms, Corbin, and South Green Acres areas. Developed design and details to improve existing problems and complaints in those areas. • Pines /Mansfield fire station swale - On -hold through spring /summer 2010 to see if this resolves itself with continued root growth. • 16 and Shamrock Drainage — Drafted a historical outline of this problem from the Ridgemont Estates No. 3, 2nd and 1S Additions (County developments) which discharge onto properties and the public streets in the City of Spokane Valley. Letter sent to County Engineer, awaiting response. • Upper Valleyview Drainage — Met internally (Fall 2009) to discuss the runoff from private roads /subdivisions in the county flowing onto city streets in the Valleyview Neighborhood. • SW Evaluation Form — Developed a form to help evaluate stormwater problems and give a relative basis for priority ranking. Continued evaluation of historic and new stormwater problems and ranking them to further develop a stormwater improvement program. Adding to a new map showing location and ranking of stormwater problems that have been evaluated and status. • Phase II Implementation Project (DOE Grant G0600363) This Ecology funded grant includes various tasks to help the City implement requirements under the Department of Ecology's Phase II Municipal Stormwater Permit. Staff worked on Public Education and Outreach Tasks including development of brochures, content for web page(s), and procedures for the Illicit Discharge, Detection, and Elimination. City staff has proposed to Ecology staff to amend grant to expend remaining budget on equipment. • Ecology SW Grant #2 -Received a $50k grant that will need to be expended by June 2011. • Stormwater Decant Facility — to be programmed with 2011 -2017 Stormwater Plan. • Sweeping & Structure Cleaning Study -. Contacted a consultant to possibly assist with this study. Consultant has submitted a proposed scope of work. On hold. • SW Permit Compliance Tracking — Compiled a list of Ecology Stormwater Permit compliance deadlines to be tracked on a monthly basis by spreadsheet. Developing filing method for tracking records relating to the Ecology Stormwater Permit that will also utilize Laserfiche electronic filing method. updated May 18, 2010 2010 Stormwater Fee Assessor Rolls Update — Evaluated changes to existing or new commercial properties for 2010 Roll Update. Provided ongoing support. OTHER PROJECTS • Bike and Pedestrian Master Plan Community Development is currently proceeding with the development of the Master Plan. • Street Maintenance Storage Facility Part of long -range stormwater plan currently under development. GRANT APPLICATIONS FHWA Surface Transportation Program (Urban) (STP(U)) SRTC Board approved in May funding for the three projects listed below. Authorization to obligate funds and begin work on these projects is anticipated by the end of July this year. City match on these projects is 13.5 %. • Mission Avenue Improvements —Flora to Barker (PE— $517,600 and RW — $400,000 only) • Broadway /Argonne /Mullan Concrete Intersection (PE only — $276,600) • Sullivan /Euclid Concrete Intersection (PE only — $175,200) • FHWA Bridge Program Staff prepared and submitted an application for the Sullivan Road West Bridge Replacement Project. Total replacement cost - $19,743,334. City match is 20 %. We should know by November if this project was successful in getting funded. See FMSI B request below for 20% local match. • Safe Routes to School (federal) Staff prepared and submitted a bike /pedestrian grant application for the construction of a sidewalk on 1) Wellesley Avenue from Sullivan Road to 150 feet east of Isenhart Road and 2) Adams Road from Wellesley Avenue to Trent Avenue (SR 290). Total Grant Request - $628,000. City funding - $4,000 in- kind match. • Washington 2010 Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Grant (state) Staff prepared and submitted a pedestrian /bicycle safety grant application for the construction of sidewalks on the west side of Sullivan Road from 4 th Avenue to 16 Avenue. Total Grant Request - $842,000. City funding - $0. • Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board (FMSIB) (state) Staff prepared and submitted applications for the two projects listed below. • Sullivan Road West Bridge Replacement Project - $3,950,000 (20% of total replacement cost) • Barker Road /BNSF Grade Separation Project - $10,000,000 (20% of total cost) • Transportation Improvement Board (TIB) (state) TIP has issued a call for projects for their Urban Arterial Program (UAP) and Sidewalk Program (SP) The UAP focuses on projects that improve safety by reducing collision potential. Staff is currently reviewing the draft TIP to identify projects that would best meet the grant criteria for these two programs. Applications are due at the end of August. • SmartRoutes Call for Projects 2010 SRTC has a call out for regionally significant non - motorized construction and planning projects affecting walking, bicycling and access to transit. Applications are due July 1, 2010. updated May 18, 2010 STREET & STORMWATER MAINTENANCE ACTIVITY The following is a summary of Public Works /Contractor maintenance activities in the City of Spokane Valley for May 2010: Spring Street and Stormwater Maintenance Items: • City of Spokane Valley personnel and Poe Asphalt are working on pothole patching and shouldering. • AAA sweeping has begun the annual spring sweeping program. • AAA has also begun the vectoring underground stormwater structure cleaning program. • Geiger crews are providing litter pickup services. • City of Spokane Valley personnel are preparing asphalt maintenance activities for the construction season of 2010. Estimates for Public Works projects for 2010 will be coming soon. Emergency Winter Snow Operations: • Terminated for spring season updated May 18, 2010 � Va I ley May -10 # Road Projects Funding Project Manager Proposed Bid Date % Complete Estimated Construction Completion Total Project Cost PE I CN 0003 Barker Road Bridge Replacement BR Progran Knutson 04/18/08 100 90 07/31/10 $ 11,817,000 0005 Pines /Manfield, Wilbur Rd to Pines TIB Knutson 05/23/08 100 95 10/31/10 $ 6,627,000 0063 Broadway Avenue Safety Project, Pines RD UAP Knutson 07/30/10 20 0 10/31/10 $ 932,850 0065 Sullivan /Sprague PCC Intersection STP(P) Aldworth 05/28/10 100 0 10/31/10 $ 1,229,371 0069 Park Rd Recon. #2 Brdwy & Ind. SRTC06 -12 STP(U) Knutson 25 0 $ 352,002 0088 Broadway Ave. Moore to Flora TIB Aldworth 06/04/10 90 0 11/14/10 $ 2,757,000 0112 Indiana Ave Extension UCP Aldworth 50 0 07/01/11 $ 1,818,000 0113 Indiana /Sullivan PCC Intersection STA Aldworth 5 0 12/31/11 $ 1,252,000 0114 Broadway /Sullivan PCC Intersection STA Aldworth 02/12/10 100 0 12/31/10 $ 1,231,000 0127 2009 ADA Improvements CDBG Aldworth 04/07/10 95 0 $ 110,713 0139 Park Road RR Crossing Safety Improvement WUTC Knutson 2 0 12/31/10 $ 44,000 Sewer Projects 0106 West Pondersoa (STEP) 302 Arlt 05/06/09 100 98 06/01/10 $ 1,215,335 0128 West Farms (STEP) 001 Arlt 02/17/10 100 20 11/01/10 $ 427,000 0129 South Greenacres (STEP) 001 Arlt 03/03/10 100 5 07/01/11 $ 640,500 0130 Corbin (STEP) 001 Arlt 05/05/10 100 0 11/01/10 $ 705,000 0131 Cronk (STEP) 001 Arlt 04/14/10 100 5 11/01/10 $ 315,000 Street Preservation Projects 0110 Sprague Avenue Rehabilitation ARRA(i) Arlt 04/17/09 100 99 06/01/10 $ 2,838,000 0115 Sprague Ave Resurfacing - E'grn to S'van 102 Arlt 95 0 $ 95,000 # Road Projects Funding Project Manager Proposed Bid Date % Complete Estimated Construction Completion Total Project Cost PE I CN Traffic Projects 0060 Argonne Road Corridor Upgrade (SRTC 06 -3 CMAQ Knutson 0 0 $ 1,290,636 0061 Pines (SR27) ITS Improvements (SRTC 06 -2 CMAQ Knutson 0 0 $ 2,083,121 0133 Sprague Ave ITS USDOE (d) Knutson 0 0 $ 400,000 0135 Flashing Yellow Arrow Installation USDOE (d) Kipp 100 40 12/31/10 $ 33,550 0136 Traffic Signal LED Replacement USDOE (d) Kipp 0 0 12/31/11 $ 65,000 0137 Traffic Signal Coordination USDOE (d) Note 0 0 $ - Parks Projects 0076 Valley Mission Park 301 0 0 $ - 0079 Greenacres Park 0 0 $ - 0086 Discovery Playground CTED Worley 05/01/09 100 99 05/12/10 $ - Other Projects 0054 44th Ave Pathway - Woodruff Rd to Sands Rd STP(E) Aldworth 100 0 10/15/10 $ 334,200 0134 Bike & Ped Master Plan - Facility Imp USDOE (d) Note 0 0 08/31/12 $ - 0138 Pre Award Consultant Costs USDOE (d) 0 0 $ - Closeout Phase 0039 Argonne Rd Overlay - Indiana to Montgom. Fed Progra Arlt 100 100 $ 405,948 0062 Appleway /Sprague /Dishman Mica ITS CMAQ Knutson 09/18/08 100 100 10/30/09 $ 672,000 0071 SIGNAL CONTROLLER UPGRADES SRTC 06 -22 CMAQ Knutson 04/29/08 100 100 11/30/09 $ 258,400 0099 WSDOT Urban Ramp Project Special Cap Worley 100 100 09/30/09 $ 300,000 0100 16th and Bettman Stormwater 402 Arlt 04/01/09 100 100 06/01/10 $ 116,563 0102 Evergreen - Sprague PCC STA Aldworth 04/24/10 100 100 02/09/10 $ 685,000 0103 Pines - Sprague PCC STA Aldworth 03/20/09 100 100 12/07/09 $ 978,000 0104 McDonald - Sprague PCC STA Aldworth 04/24/10 100 100 02/09/10 $ 762,000 0107 Valleyview (STEP) 302 Arlt 04/01/09 100 100 06/01/10 $ 679,923 0108 Rotchford Acres (STEP) 302 Arlt 04/22/09 100 100 10/01/09 $ 388,306 0109 Clement (STEP) 302 Arlt 05/13/09 100 100 11/01/09 $ 565,116 CAPITAL PROJECTS Road Projects 0003 - Barker Road Bridge Replacement Contractor stripping forms under bridge deck. Asphalt base placed on both approaches; final paving to occur when weather permits. Sidewalks and driveway approaches complete. Barrier pours complete. Work bridge removal cannot occur until after June 15 (HPA restriction on in -water work). 0005 - Pines /Mansfield, Wilbur Rd to Pines Released retainage bond for Inland Asphalt; working on update to drawing for UPRR work to move the gates and signals. 0019 - Broadway Ave Road Rehab 0063 - Broadway Avenue Safety Project, Pines RD Consultant has prepared initial draft layout. Design work suspended pending further direction from Council. Funded by TO (20% local match, 0065 - Sullivan /Sprague PCC Intersection Project is being bid with construction tentatively scheduled to start Monday, July 19, 2010 0069 - Park Rd Recon. #2 Brdwy & Ind. SRTC06 -12 Project funded for PE only. Consultant design approximately 25% complete. Forecasting design work to be complete by end of July 2010. 0088 - Broadway Ave. Moore to Flora Project is being Bid with construction tentatively scheduled to start the first week in August. 0112 - Indiana Ave Extension Working on final design. Scheduled to be bid fall 2010 and pave in spring 2011 0113 - Indiana /Sullivan PCC Intersection Project Design will resume in Fall of 2010. STA has approved project delay until 2011. 0114 - Broadway /Sullivan PCC Intersection Paving completed on May 24th. Signal pole replacement on SW corner and plastic pavement marking work remain. 0127 - 2009 ADA Improvements Project awarded to Wm Winkler with construction starting June 7th and completed by June 30th. 0139 - Park Road RR Crossing Safety Improvement WUTC approved project on March 25, 2010. Funding agreement executed April 23, 2010. Starting design work. Funding expires 12/31/2010 Page 1 of 4 Sewer Projects 0106 - West Ponderosa (STEP) Phase 1 — Paving complete; punchlist items remain. Phase 2 — All sewer main and paving complete. Restoration of yards and driveway paving remain. 0128 - West Farms (STEP) Construction continues on Wellesley and Mayhew. Subgrade work on Wellesley has begun with paving scheduled for mid June. 0129 - South Greenacres (STEP) Phase 3 (north of Mission) - Owens Construction awarded project. Construction began on 4/26/10. Phase 4 (south of Mission) — County design complete. Project is being advertised with a bid opening scheduled for June 9th. 0130 - Corbin (STEP) Murphy Bros. Inc. is the apparent low bid. 0131 - Cronk (STEP) Knife River began construction on Mission Avenue east of Barker Road on 5/19/10. Street Preservation Projects 0110 - Sprague Avenue Rehabilitation ADA ramp work remains. 0115 - Sprague Ave Resurfacing - E'grn to S'van Awaiting Funding Traffic Projects 0060 - Argonne Road Corridor Upgrade (SRTC 06 -3 Project will upgrade signal poles and mast arms at Knox, remove signal displays on center islands and improve curb radii on all quadrants. Possible right turn lane to be constructed northbound Argonne at Montgomery. Reviewing updated scope /fee from DKS Associates for design work. Funded by CMAQ (13.5% local match) 0061 - Pines (SR27) ITS Improvements (SRTC 06 -2 Currently negotiating scope /fee with Transpo Group. Project will install conduit and communications cable between Sprague Ave and Trent Ave, install a traffic camera at the Sprague /Pines intersection and connect all the devices to the Spokane Regional Transportation Management Center. PE work to start in 3Q or 4Q 2010. Funded by CMAQ (13.5% local match). 0133 - Sprague Ave ITS Project will install fiber optic cable along Sprague from University to Sullivan then north on Sullivan to tie in with the existing network. Conduit and other equipment to be installed as needed to complete the run. Project includes crossing Pines. Some funds will be used to develop an ITS Master Plan for guidance on location and implementation of future ITS projects. Selected Transpo Group as the most qualified consultant for this project. Page 2 of 4 0135 - Flashing Yellow Arrow Installation We have installed flashing yellow arrows (FYA) at a total of 4 intersections so far. They are: Broadway/Walmart, Sprague /Costco, Sprague /Flora, and 16th /Sullivan. Next installation will be 24th /Sullivan week of 5/31. A Total of 5 -7 intersections will be retro -fitted with FYA. 0136 - Traffic Signal LED Replacement This project will complete the installation of LEDs in the City's signals. Plan to purchase and install LEDs later in 2010 0137 - Traffic Signal Coordination Project to prepare evening and weekend coordination plans for select arterial corridors. Planned for late 2010 to early 2011. Parks Projects 0076 - Valley Mission Park 0079 - Greenacres Park 0086 - Discovery Playground Grand opening was Thursday, May 13. Working on punchlist items and final closeout. Other Projects 0054 - 44th Ave Pathway - Woodruff Rd to Sands Rd Design completed. Requesting release of Construction Funds from WSDOT 0134 - Bike & Ped Master Plan - Facility Imp On hold until Bicycle Master Plan is completed 0138 - Pre Award Consultant Costs Contract was for services to help submit EECBG. Completed in Summer of 2009 Closeout Phase 0039 - Argonne Rd Overlay - Indiana to Montgom. Project Closed 0062 - Appleway /Sprague /Dishman Mica ITS Project administered by WSDOT. Completed in summer 2009. In closeout. 0066 - Broadway Rehab Phase 2 Project completed Page 3 of 4 0071 - SIGNAL CONTROLLER UPGRADES SRTC 06 -22 Spokane County installed /configured controllers purchased under State contract. Project complete; in closeout. 0099 - WSDOT Urban Ramp Project 0100 - 16th and Bettman Stormwater Complete 0102 - Evergreen - Sprague PCC In final closeout phase. 0103 - Pines - Sprague PCC In final closeout phase 0104 - McDonald - Sprague PCC In final closeout phase. 0107 - Valleyview (STEP) Complete 0108 - Rotchford Acres (STEP) Complete 0109 - Clement (STEP) Complete Page 4 of 4 CAPITAL PROJECTS Road Projects 0003 - Barker Road Bridge Replacement Contractor stripping forms under bridge deck. Asphalt base placed on both approaches; final paving to occur when weather permits. Sidewalks and driveway approaches complete. Barrier pours complete. Work bridge removal cannot occur until after June 15 (HPA restriction on in -water work). 0005 - Pines /Manfield, Wilbur Rd to Pines Released retainage bond for Inland Asphalt; working on update to drawing for UPRR work to move the gates and signals. 0063 - Broadway Avenue Safety Project, Pines RD Consultant has prepared initial draft layout. Design work suspended pending further direction from Council. Funded by TIB (20% local match). 0065 - Sullivan /Sprague PCC Intersection Project is being bid with construction tentatively scheduled to start Monday, July 19, 2010. 0069 - Park Rd Recon. #2 Brdwy & Ind. SRTC06 -12 Project funded for PE only. Consultant design approximately 25% complete. Forecasting design work to be complete by end of July 2010. 0088 - Broadway Ave. Moore to Flora Project is being Bid with construction tentatively scheduled to start the first week in August. 0112 - Indiana Ave Extension Working on final design. Scheduled to be bid fall 2010 and pave in spring 2011. 0113 - Indiana /Sullivan PCC Intersection Project Design will resume in Fall of 2010. STA has approved project delay until 2011. 0114 - Broadway /Sullivan PCC Intersection Paving completed on May 24th. Signal pole replacement on SW corner and plastic pavement marking work remain. Road Projects 0127 - 2009 ADA Improvements Project awarded to Wm Winkler with construction starting June 7th and completed by June 30th. 0139 - Park Road RR Crossing Safety Improvement WUTC approved project on March 25, 2010. Funding agreement executed April 23, 2010. Starting design work. Funding expires 12/31/2010. Sewer Projects 0106 -West Pondersoa (STEP) Phase 1 — Paving complete; punchlist items remain. Phase 2 — All sewer main and paving complete. Restoration of yards and driveway paving remain. 0128 -West Farms (STEP) Construction continues on Wellesley and Mayhew. Subgrade work on Welleslely has begun with paving scheduled for mid June. 0129 - South Greenacres (STEP) Phase 3 (north of Mission) - Owens Construction awarded project. Construction began on 4/26/10. Phase 4 (south of Mission) — County design complete. Project is being advertised with a bid opeining scheduled for June 9th. 0130 - Corbin (STEP) Murphy Bros. Inc. is the apparent low bid. 0131 - Cronk (STEP) Knife River began construction on Mission Avenue east of Barker Road on 5/19/10. Street Preservation Projects 0110 - Sprague Avenue Rehabilitation ADA ramp work remains. 0115 - Sprague Ave Resurfacing - E'grn to S'van Awaiting Funding. Traffic Projects 0060 - Argonne Road Corridor Upgrade (SRTC 06 -3 Project will upgrade signal poles and mast arms at Knox, remove signal displays on center islands and improve curb radii on all quadrants. Possible right turn lane to be constructed northbound Argonne at Montbomery. Reviewing updated scope /fee from DKS Associates for design work. Funded by CMAQ (13.5% local match) 0061 - Pines (SR27) ITS Improvements (SRTC 06 -2 Currently negotiating scope /fee with Transpo Group. Project will install conduit and communications cable between Sprague Ave and Trent Ave, install a traffic camera at the Sprague /Pines intersection and connect all the devices to the Spokane Regional Transportation Management Center. PE work to start in 3Q or 4Q 2010. Funded by CMAQ (13.5% local match). 0133 - Sprague Ave ITS Project will install fiber optic cable along Sprague from University to Sullivan then north on Sullivan to tie in with the existing network. Conduit and other equipment to be installed as needed to complete the run. Project includes crossing Pines. Some funds will be used to develop an ITS Master Plan for guidance on location and implementation of future ITS projects. Selected Transpo Group as the most qualified consultant for this project. 0135 - Flashing Yellow Arrow Installation We have installed flashing yellow arrows (FYA) at Broadwa/Walmart, Sprague /Costco and Sprague /Flora. Next installation will be 16th /Sullivan week of 5/31. A Total of 5 -7 intersections will be retro- fitted with FYA. 0136 - Traffic Signal LED Replacement This project will complete the installation of LEDs in the City's signals. Plan to purchase and install LEDs later in 2010. 0137 - Traffic Signal Coordination Project to prepare evening and weekend coordination plans for select arterial corridors. Planned for late 2010 to early 2011. Parks Projects 0076 -Valley Mission Park 0079 - Greenacres Park 0086 - Discovery Playground Grand opening was Thursday, May 13. Working on punchlist items and final closeout. Other Projects 0054 - 44th Ave Pathway - Woodruff Rd to Sands Rd Design completed. Requesting release of Construction Funds from WSDOT. 0134 - Bike & Ped Master Plan - Facility Imp On hold until Bicycle Master Plan is completed. 0138 - Pre Award Consultant Costs Contract was for services to help submitt EECBG. Completed in Summer of 2009. Closeout Phase 0039 - Argonne Rd Overlay - Indiana to Montgom. Project Closed 0062 - Appleway /Sprague /Dishman Mica ITS Project administered by WSDOT. Completed in summer 2009. In closeout. 0071 - SIGNAL CONTROLLER UPGRADES SRTC 06 -22 Spokane County installed /configured controllers purchased under State contract. Project complete; in closeout. 0099 - WSDOT Urban Ramp Project 0100 -16th and Bettman Stormwater Complete 0102 - Evergreen - Sprague PCC In final closeout phase. 0103 - Pines - Sprague PCC In final closeout phase. 0104 - McDonald - Sprague PCC In final closeout phase. 0107 - Valleyview (STEP) Complete Closeout Phase 0108 - Rotchford Acres (STEP) Complete 0109 - Clement (STEP) Complete MEMO TO: Mike Jackson, Acting City Manager FROM: Rick VanLeuven, Chief of Police DATE: June 21, 2010 RE: Monthly Report May 2010 May 2010: May 2009: CAD incidents: 5016 CAD incidents: 5,270 Reports taken: 1534 Reports taken: 1,410 Traffic stops: 1861 Traffic stops: 1,861 Traffic reports: 248 Traffic reports: 275 CAD incidents indicate calls for service as well as self - initiated officer contacts. Hot spot maps are attached showing May residential burglaries, commercial burglaries, traffic collision hot spots and vehicle prowling hot spots, along with April 2010 and May 2010 stolen vehicle hot spots. Also attached are nine bar graphs for 2007, 2008, 2009 and May 2010: commercial burglary, garage burglary, residential burglary, forgery, malicious mischief, stolen vehicles, theft, vehicle prowling, and property crimes comparisons for 2007 through 2009. ADMINISTRATIVE: Chief VanLeuven attended the LEIRA (Law Enforcement Information Records Associates) business lunch in early May. Theresa Giannetto, the Records Division manager for Spokane County's main repository of reports and records, took the opportunity to introduce Chief VanLeuven and he spoke to the association thanking them for their dedicated service and accomplishments to help facilitate law enforcement functions. The quarterly Drug Task Force Policy Board meeting was held in early May, which Chief VanLeuven attended. The Annual Law Enforcement Breakfast took place in early May at Faith Bible Church. In attendance was Chief VanLeuven, Acting Spokane Valley City Manager Mike Jackson, Mayor Towey, Spokane Valley City Councilwoman Rose Dempsey and her husband, as well as Spokane Valley City Councilman Bill Gothmann. Representative Tim Ormsby hosted a dinner in mid -May to discuss the issue of homelessness and the challenges and impacts to our county. Chief VanLeuven and Lt. Lyons attended this open discussion. Chief VanLeuven attended the Grand Opening of the Discovery Playground at Mirabeau Park. Page 1 Chief VanLeuven attended the Sheriff's Citizens Advisory Board Meeting with Lt. Lyons, to introduce Lt. Lyons as the new Precinct Commander for the Spokane Valley Police Department. Chief VanLeuven was in attendance at the Annual Law Enforcement Officers Memorial Observation on May 10th in the cul de sac on Mallon. There was no firing party this year, but instead a bell ceremony was used. Sadly, the names of 11 law enforcement officers whose lives were lost across the State of Washington in the past year, which were added and dedicated to the memorial. Chief VanLeuven participated in the FireArm Crime Enforcement (FACE) Committee at Airway Heights Corrections Center in mid -May. The committee provided excellent information to the releasing offenders, who were prescreened as armed career criminals. The committee consisted of local, state and federal agencies who encouraged the offenders to make wise decisions in order to deter them from committing future firearms crimes. Chief VanLeuven attended the Washington Association of Sheriffs and Police Chiefs (WASPC) Spring Exposition and Training Conference in mid -May. This was a week -long conference hosted in Spokane, bringing sheriffs and police chiefs together from across the state. Spokane Valley Police and Spokane Valley Fire participated in the annual Battle of the Badge, a friendly competition between the two agencies. For four Monday in May, each agency was challenged by the other to see how many pints of blood could be donated to the Inland Northwest Blood Center. Donations from friends, family and coworkers counted toward the total, with the winner again going to the Spokane Valley Fire Department. Thank you to all who participated towards a good cause. Spokane Valley Mall hosted the "Take 25" event in mid -May. This program is a U.S. Department of Justice child safety campaign that is being promoted by the Office of Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS) and the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children (NCMEC.) In 1983, President Ronald Reagan declared May 25 National Missing Children's Day. Each administration Page 2 since has honored the date as an annual reminder to make child protection and safety a national priority. To further commemorate the date, the NCMEC in May 2007 launched Take 25, a national grassroots effort in which law enforcement, parents and educators are encouraged to Take 25 minutes to talk to children about ways to be safer. Groups participating in the event included SCOPE and Neighborhood Watch with Operation Family ID as well as Sheriff's personnel to discuss the Offender Watch Program and the Registered Sex Offender program in Spokane County. Numerous books, games, brochures, bracelets and security toolkits were available from a myriad of agencies. The Spokane Valley Police Department is now on Facebook. Look for us and become a "Fan." Chief VanLeuven will occasionally contribute posts entitled "Tips from the Chief," to address safety issues for Spokane Valley citizens. Also included on our wall are police news releases, information on emphasis patrols by our Traffic Unit, as well as photos of our officers, and events they attended. b w NPdke1 V allay Ralkr Del1A9[mMl9 We're no+,v rm.4r imPbrrYmlmq a vw `Yp5 Ffitifi TMeet11EF pvq'.Ai leap , IJy. t, grra Y. ... in.anV va_dk fegm Cr f &xX V-Leii:an. Tad9Y'9 tp i...abn palm pr9>la... —. WA ". pb u. 99rdv "a- 00.0 ea. * + Gnzx ✓J s aam r„rer rc�r. 4. L9R The Memorial Day Ceremony hosted by the Marine Corps League along with the Veterans of Foreign Wars, Post 51, was held at Fairmount Memorial Park and attended by Chief VanLeuven. The ceremony provided a time for family and friends to pause on this special day to remember the deceased veterans from all branches of our Anned Forces who served this fine country. Page 3 7lsiry Piw 1M�lrlmml WBmLOaR W9w . "" 9gsr NSbR.lbew9Yew'M NrerrPM per eF U'P V_ r'dee oea✓amn Jk lerr..m.Vae..� -.e :4 W»s. ffa; TNa Ylq�wr :m.9.'n fdanfSCdaC�9rlere �r ryawa.e ai'ip✓A-u .Sa Sad aea KUd•r< foal LOVdSe. c. w� V� ��ii r.Md ¢+asfran de [swa M, r, rrca!Slwll+�'Qq'✓r.w.r4ry,nMpAw _ b 9l ra M:,. a+�..A'tr..J M1.n ' iaort II �,. ry'[�wf rR'iewrm'i 11.e LeC from rrah aC'ad `• r 9exr asae. S� ff o k ww Very P Arx• DLI a m L T Scmlal Qty- � L—h -f ft 6 -e. 41n 9M _.d 144.1 " _-W Mk spy --11ky _v. aewpT Cde6ratn Spgkmle's '.: aIW N9 meyw tram U K ury .* AA . (laae91 . a 4tC9 �' an wa9t Nar A$ d UN Siele:Weyf II .rh la Nu m. irlMr+.Kly r pwappuN in m Mvival Serch Nu %r sr, glysrq r4• Lmer Asy Lif�'srys �,a .9dmrR e99rY.'N6, 99$!d !¢w1: Yr�': rn9AU r uSn.ra a ] rabA.s s�4 y.rr -dm •vx, a.u:W o-e a� e - ,ererw,p r pm 1ve Y, 19>rd NO✓nT9�]pn �` �n gar .. ,.lr lmrmt •.ee ree r i l � tdW nri-y.Y/9 em "�dcvn.. V.siy Pri[r•Fxxrvµrmrnl FM - h[.00aCa a teN Lh�ris+rf : ree eNeee w.r FM47aia Fand See dd YIK•kplfsr9 ax.+esmrr.9U.1 u+q:aFt� <+fYrM1�4`Q e ez rrl. k +1 • f f • 12.1w ^.'mac er..err erarnir. a.I s✓� 10i mwxsam l � �� 4 o m-ol Rama.,e WtvSrt'+cNa!erMC*+l v usamr ylgt � Poe wane.. wa•wk. rr y 6w . . �R6N��C4YC _: . fFrtrV rv �. - �. Pr �, di�F�YI?Cti ,. rrwr a• u.a.aw1.. e _ c . -. L ;:s��uuue r.yac.,a Lxaa+,yPA �d'adem 99Peapk 1149aYe 4yaknee YAey Priem flaper9s�enS. Vfe re �Iry W b9 MgkMSnklMJ e use L �l'e'S S-irnM tw C xF P_ I— :Ne'. !n 4am v. 9o1ee �nfartrtWan @e dj from Gael Ndc V L wen. TadaVs 9p � lbws palm ® M ir Prmk9... �'! se« n.l ♦imlp cmem.ee 19e mewro The Memorial Day Ceremony hosted by the Marine Corps League along with the Veterans of Foreign Wars, Post 51, was held at Fairmount Memorial Park and attended by Chief VanLeuven. The ceremony provided a time for family and friends to pause on this special day to remember the deceased veterans from all branches of our Anned Forces who served this fine country. Page 3 COMMUNITY ORIENTED POLICING: S.C.O.P.E. participated in the following events during the month of May: • Participated in West Valley SD remote student parent pickup site; • Participated in the Broadway Elementary School Bicycle Safety training, • Participated in the Junior Lilac Parade; • Participated in the Spokane County Library bicycle helmet giveaway; • Participated in the Annual Torchlight Lilac Parade; • Take 25, Safe Kids event the Spokane Valley Mall; • Safe Routes to Schools with East Valley School District; • Attended the Law Enforcement Appreciation Breakfast; • Attended the Greater Spokane Substance Abuse Council Coalition meeting; • Attended the Spokane Safe Kids meeting; and, • Attended the Community Emergency Response Team (CERT) meeting. May 2010 Volunteers Hours per station: CV S.C.O.P.E ----------- - - - - -- 643.5 hrs. Edgecliff S.C.O.P.E. ---- - - - - -- 808.0 hrs. Trentwood S.C.O.P.E. - - - - - -- 391.0 hrs. University S.C.O.P.E. -- - - - - -- 523.5 hrs. Total SV April 2,366.0 hrs. Volunteers contributed 72.5 more hours of Service in May 2010 compared to May 2009 (2,293.5 hours). • S.C.O.P.E. Incident Response Team (SIRT) volunteers contributed 27 on -scene hours (including travel time) in April, responding to crime scenes, structure fires, motor vehicle accidents (including a hit and run) and providing traffic control. Three of the four incidents occurred in the Spokane Valley. (The number of hours was not specified.) Total April volunteer hours contributed by SIRT, including training, stand -by, response and special events, is 528; year -to -date total is 2,109 hours. • S.C.O.P.E. Incident Response Team (SIRT) volunteers contributed 84 on -scene hours (including travel time) in May, responding to crime scenes, structure fires, motor vehicle accidents (including a hit and run) and providing traffic control. Of those hours, 28 hours were for incidents in the City of Spokane Valley. Total May volunteer hours contributed by SIRT, including training, stand -by, response and special events is 655; year -to -date total is 2,764 hours. • There were five juvenile runaways in the Spokane Valley for the month of May 2010. • Abandoned vehicles tagged by S.C.O.P.E. volunteers for impoundment in the Spokane Valley in April totaled 17 and in May 26, with 5 and 9 respectively, vehicles eventually cited Page 4 and towed. Twenty -six hulks were processed in April and 24 hulks processed in May. During the month of May, a total of 161 vehicles were processed. S.C.O.P.E. DISABLED PARKING ACTIVITY REPORT JANUARY - DECEMBER 2010 City of Spokane Valley # of Vol. # of Hrs # of Disabled Infractions Issued # of Warnings Issued # of Non - Disabled Infractions Issued January 9 360 63 93 2 February 8 342 39 122 2 March 8 411 36 82 2 April 6 286 35 47 2 May 6 136 17 65 0 Total 37 1535 190 409 g Spokane Coun # of Vol. # of Hrs # of Disabled Infractions Issued # of Warnings Issued # of Non - Disabled Infractions Issued January 6 47 1 23 0 February 5 78.5 0 15 0 March 4 47 2 5 0 April 7 107.5 12 19 0 May Total 9 31 67 347 17 32 9 71 0 0 OPERATIONS: • Spokane Valley Police Officers Receive Lifesaving Award - Spokane Valley Fire Commissioners awarded two police officers with Outstanding Citizen Awards in early May. Spokane Valley Police Officer Dale Wells and Officer David Lawhorn responded to a driver who had had a major heart attack in late March 2010 while behind the wheel, and was unresponsive upon contact. The officers performed life - saving efforts on the driver until paramedics arrived. The driver made a successful recovery from the major heart attack, due in part to the officers' efforts. Dale Wells was hired by the Spokane County Sheriffs Office in August 2005. David Lawhorn was hired in August 2008. Both are assigned as patrol officers for the Spokane Valley Police. Page 5 • Graffiti pair caught in the act — A witness to a teenage male and female spray painting street signs and fences called police to the area of 16 and Pines in early May. Deputies located the pair as they were walking down the street carrying backpacks. The female denied any involvement in the spray painting until it was pointed out to her by deputies that she had silver paint on her face and hands. Both teens, who stated they were bored and just decided to start painting things, were cited for third degree malicious mischief. • Dispute Leads To Stabbing - A 47- year -old transient had his throat slit one evening in early May, during a drunken dispute in a Spokane Valley homeless camp. The victim was assaulted by a 37- year -old transient living on the south side of the freeway, in a fenced area that is treed, between Sullivan and Evergreen. Witnesses told varying stories about how the assault occurred, but a female in the camp who hid the knife under a log said the fight began when a couple came from another camp and entered the second camp uninvited. The uninvited couple refused to leave and the two men began fighting. The two were grappling with each other when the suspect pulled the knife. An uninvolved transient in the camp called 9 -1 -1 on his cell phone to report the incident. The victim was transported to a Spokane Valley medical center where he was treated and released. The suspect was booked into the Spokane County Jail on a felony count of First - Degree Assault. Officers reported that alcohol intoxication was rampant among the camp's tenants. State land in the area of the interchange has already been posted "no trespassing" in an effort to curb squatters. • Jury Convicts Valley Robber - A Spokane County jury convicted the suspect who robbed the East Sprague 50% Off Card Shop at knifepoint in February 2008. The 37- year -old male was found guilty of First - Degree Anned Robbery. During the 2008 robbery of the card store, the suspect pulled a black folding knife from his clothing and held it close to a 22- year -old female employee while demanding cash from the tills. He ran from the store to the east and eluded capture by officers that night. However, the suspect was ultimately identified as the robber and was located in Red Lodge, Montana. Members of the U.S. Marshals Fugitive Task Force and a Billings Montana police officer arrested him there on a Spokane County arrest warrant. • Valley Felon Arrested On Gun Charge - Officers arrested a Spokane Valley felony after he fired a shotgun blast through his floor and into a downstairs apartment during a bout of depression. The male suspect was booked into the Spokane County Jail on a felony count of First - Degree Unlawful Possession of a Fireann and two misdemeanor counts of Reckless Endangerment. Officer Jeff Welton and others were called to the apartment shortly after noon by the manager who reported the suspect was suicidal. She said she didn't know if he was armed with a firearm or not, but the tenants below his apartment had a hole in their ceiling. Welton found the suspect seated on the sidewalk in front of the apartments and detained him. Inside the apartment he found a pistol -grip shotgun on the bed and a hole in the living room carpet. Witnesses inside the apartment reported the suspect holding the gun to his head and then swinging it down and firing into the floor. The officers checked the apartment below and learned that the couple living there were in their living area at the time the shot entered through the ceiling. The blast was about five feet from the husband and 10 feet from the wife. Page 6 • High -Speed Pursuit Nets Stolen Car - A vehicle theft suspect and his accomplice found themselves in police custody after the two attempted to elude capture in a high -speed chase on a Saturday afternoon. Spokane Valley Police Officer Michael Wall was on patrol about shortly before 1 p.m. when he saw a gold Honda Accord with three occupants leaving the 7- Eleven store at Broadway and Park, which showed as stolen from the Cit of Spokane. Wall followed the car while waiting for backup officers to arrive, and when he attempted to stop the car, the driver took off and a pursuit began. The pursuit was terminated as being too dangerous, however, the stolen car was found abandoned at Division and Main. While waiting for backup, Officer Wall had gotten a good look at the driver, and now spotted the suspect crossing the street at Pine and Spokane Falls Blvd and arrested him. The female passenger was located and detained as well. While interviewing her, the woman pulled baggies containing methamphetamine and heroin from her clothing and handed them over. The back seat contained cases of hand tools, possibly stolen. Wall booked the 26- year -old male driver on felony counts of Possession of a Stolen Vehicle and Attempting to Elude a Police Vehicle. He also charged him with misdemeanor counts of Possession of Motor Vehicle Theft Tools and Third - Degree Driving while License Suspended. The 23- year -old female of Spokane was booked for Second - Degree Taking a Motor Vehicle without Owner's Permission, Possession of a Stolen Motor Vehicle, Possession of Heroin and Possession of Methamphetamine. • Couple Arrested In Oxycodone Distribution Case - A 28- year -old Spokane Valley man and his 26- year -old girlfriend went to jail charged with Possession of Oxycodone after the sheriffs Investigative Task Force detectives found more than 500 pills at their apartment in mid -May. Investigators believe the finale suspect has been importing the powerful pain medication from California. In addition to the pills, detectives found $159,000 in bundles of cash in the couple's closet. They also seized four active cellular phones and a 9mm semi- automatic pistol during the search. The girlfriend has a concealed - pistol permit. Lead Detective Russ Dowdy said 499 oxycodone pills were found in the trunk of the couple's maroon Buick Regal. Over 30 pills were atop their dresser inside the apartment. At the time of the raid, Dowdy also seized a U -Haul truck. In his search of the vehicle, the detective found what appears to be rental furniture and appliances. He also found another 150 oxycodone pills of varying dosages and two semi - automatic pistols, one of which was reportedly stolen. Dowdy said the male suspect moved to Spokane about five months ago. A series of earlier drug arrests led to the suspect as being a major source for oxycodone in the Spokane area. • Hico Burglars Arrested - A multi- agency law enforcement effort resulted in the capture and arrest of two suspects who broke into the Barker Road Hico convenience store and made off with cigarettes and small amounts of cash and coins from the tills. Spokane Valley police were dispatched to the store after an alarm was received about 35 minutes after midnight. While still on the way, they learned that a delivery man had seen a white van parked in front of the store and that he had followed it until it turned eastbound on Broadway. Liberty Lake Police Officer Taj Wilkerson spotted the van and pursued it. During the chase, a 30- year -old passenger jumped out and ran from the van. The van took off again, but blew a tire and crashed in Liberty Lake. The 29- year -old driver, Michael Lee Yamaguchi, ran and hid in a nearby housing area. He was tracked by Spokane Police K -9 Officer Paul Gorman and his Page 7 partner "Maximus," and arrested by SVPD Officer Mark Brownell. Officers seized the van for a search warrant later that day, but could see a cash drawer and spilled rolls of coins on the floor of the vehicle. Both suspects were booked into the Spokane County Jail on felony counts of Second- Degree Burglary. Yamaguchi was also booked for Attempting to Elude a Police Vehicle and the other suspect for an outstanding misdemeanor theft warrant. Yamaguchi was arrested for several counts of burglary last February, and had a pair of burglary convictions in 2006. • Altered Firearm Leads to Arrest - A 22 -year -old Greenacres man was arrested after officers discovered an altered shotgun under his front seat during a traffic stop. Officer Justin Elliott stopped the suspect after noting that his car's brake lights were stuck on and that the license plates were expired. He asked the driver if there were any weapons in the car and was told, "No." When the driver bent over to get paperwork, Elliott noticed a black object on his hip beneath the bottom of his heavy jacket. Thinking it might be a weapon, he had the suspect step from the car and performed a frisk. He found a folding knife and a multi - pliers tool on his belt. Concerned about finding a knife after being told there were no weapons in the car, Elliott performed a frisk of the driver's lunge area inside the Hyundai. Beneath the front seat, he found a .12 -gauge shotgun which had its barrel and stock shortened to an illegal length. Shells for the shotgun were located in the driver's door pocket. In further questioning, the officer learned that the suspect had cut down the firearm and both the saw and portions of the gun's barrel and stock were still in the trunk of the car. Elliott retrieved the items as evidence and arrested the suspect for Manufacture of an Unlawful Firearm. He booked him into the Spokane County Jail on the felony charge. • Burglary Investigation Leads To Arrests - Officers responding to a burglary in progress call ended up arresting the 14 and 15- year -old suspects, recovering the stolen property and seizing an SUV and pistol. At about 1 a.m. on a Monday morning, officers were dispatched to a residence in the 2700 block of N. Perrine Court. The home is a known hangout for gang associates. Upon arrival, the adult female living there said she heard noises upstairs from her basement bedroom and went up to check them out. She saw the teen boys, both of whom she knew as associates of her son, carrying her flat - screen television out of the house. A laptop left on the couch was also gone. The 15- year -old son told officers he had been conversing with the suspects on -line and they were intent on stealing a television to trade for marijuana. He refused to hand over his mother's TV, so the suspects said they would target the clubhouse of a nearby apartment complex. As officers were investigating the residential burglary, an alarm was received from the apartment complex. Someone had entered through an unlocked door and knocked a computer screen to the floor. Nothing appeared to be missing. Shortly thereafter, Corporal Darin Staley found a white Ford Expedition parked at some apartments in the 700 block of North Argonne. The two burglary suspects and two other teens were inside. All were removed and restrained for questioning. A loaded .22- caliber pistol was found in the SUV and there was a laptop on the backseat. After questioning the teens, the two named (by the victim) suspects were arrested and booked into Spokane County Juvenile Detention on felony counts of Residential Burglary. Both were runaways. A third teenager was arrested on a previously issued felony warrant. The stolen flat- screen television was later found not far from the victim's home, apparently dumped as the two suspects fled the area. Page 8 • U.S. Marshall Assist — Spokane Valley Police officers assisted U.S. Marshals and Washington State Patrol (WSP) in the capture of a subject wanted for Armed Car Jacking. Numerous Spokane Valley Police officers put together a tactical plan involving WSP and U.S. Marshal Units to take the suspect into custody. Officers placed themselves in strategic positions to pursue the suspect on foot should he attempt to flee from the vehicle, while other units, to include a K -9 Unit, were used to contact the suspect in the vehicle. The suspect chose not to flee on foot as he was surrounded and knew of the four - legged pursuit unit (otherwise known as Brax) ready to give chase and apprehend. The suspect was taken into custody without incident. This was an outstanding coordinated effort by everyone involved. • Crash Ends Pursuit, Suspects Injured - Two men were treated for minor injuries after one of them crashed the Subaru they were in while trying to elude a pursuing police corporal. Cpl. Ellis was patrolling the area of 6th and University about on a Monday evening when he passed the Subaru which was being driven without headlights. He turned and attempted to stop the car, but the driver took off, running a red light at University and 4 and then going west on Sprague at about 50 mph in the 35 mph zone. As the corporal attempted to keep up with the suspects, the driver attempted to make a high speed turn northbound onto Gillis. The car struck the sidewalk on the east side of the roadway and stopped. The 30- year -old male driver of Spokane took off running while Ellis detained the suspect. Officer Rustin Olson later found the driver who was being shoved off the front porch of a home by its residents. The driver was bleeding from the mouth and told the officers he fell on his face while scaling a fence. The passenger, a 26- year -old Spokane Valley man, was complaining of stomach pain caused by the car's impact with the sidewalk. Both men were eventually taken to a hospital to be checked out. The passenger was later released without charges, but the driver was booked into the Spokane County Jail on a felony count of Attempting to Elude a Police Vehicle and a misdemeanor count of Third - Degree Driving while License Suspended. He was also served two Spokane Municipal Court warrants charging him with theft and possession of marijuana. Officers were unable to contact the registered owner of the Subaru that night. They did recover a ring of shaved keys from inside the vehicle. • Burglar Wired — in early May, Spokane Valley Police Officer Justin Elliott stopped 44- year -old male at Argonne and Sinto for a vehicle equipment violation. He ultimately arrested the suspect for Obstructing a Police Investigation and for a felony arrest warrant charging him with Second - Degree Burglary /ATM. At the time of the stop, the suspect had in his back seat aluminum and copper wire, gloves, saws -alls and flashlights. Very suspicious, so Elliott booked the suspect and seized the vehicle. Detective Dean Meyer later executed a search warrant on the car and recovered 20+ feet of stranded aluminum wire and about 50 feet of black encased copper wire. The lengths of wire had been cut with a saws -all, and it might have come from downed power lines during the previous week's wind storms. Also recovered at the time of the search was a Clarion -brand marine am /fin /compact disk deck. • Burglars Arrested, Property Recovered - Acting on a victim's hunch, Spokane Valley Police Officers Chan Erdman and Mike McNees tracked down two burglars who had broken into a pair of homes while skipping classes from West Valley High School. McNees had been called to take a burglary report from residents at a home in the 7600 block of E. Page 9 Baldwin while Erdman was called to a nearby home for the same purpose. The residents on Baldwin said someone had pushed an unlocked window open and had stolen rifles, a shotgun, ammunition, computer components, jewelry and other items. A teenage son living there reported losing X -Box games, controllers, memory chips and a thumb drive with his name on it. At the other address, victims reported X -Box and other computer games were stolen, as was a Dell laptop computer. A teenage student living there said he suspected two acquaintances because they are "known thieves" and had been missing from school that day. The two officers got together and jointly began working the cases. During interviews with one of the teen suspects, the officers learned that he and an 18- year -old friend had entered one of the homes through an unlocked door. The two stole the items and then went to the other home where they crawled through an unsecured window. The two burglars took their loot to a residence on Shannon and left some of it there, then took a rifle and shotgun to the 18- year -old's residence. A search of the 15- year -old's bedroom led to the recovery of a large amount of stolen property that the two had intended to pawn or sell. In one of the teen's pockets, McNees found the stolen thumb drive with the victim's name on it. When they went to another address, they found the 18- year -old suspect and an 18- year -old friend who had concealed the rifle and shotgun under his bed. The officers arrested the 18- year -old suspect and booked him into the Spokane County Jail on felony counts of First - Degree Burglary, Residential Burglary, Theft of a Firearm, and First- Degree Trafficking Stolen Property. They booked the 18- year -old friend for Second - Degree Possession of a Stolen Firearm (two counts) and Second - Degree Possession of Stolen Property. The 15- year -old was booked into Spokane County Juvenile Detention on felony counts of First - Degree and Residential Burglary, First - Degree Trafficking Stolen Property and Possession of a Stolen Firearm. At the conclusion of the investigation and as the two suspects were being driven downtown, the officers learned that the pair had been in the front of West Valley High School while armed with the stolen firearms. School authorities later expelled both. • Valley Officer Catches Car Thief - A 24- year -old Greenacres resident was charged with Possession of a Stolen Motor Vehicle and Attempting to Elude a Police Vehicle after the male suspect failed to outrun Spokane Valley Police Officer Chan Erdman in a stolen Honda Accord on a late Monday morning. A resident in the 1100 block of South Herald called Crime Check and reported that an unknown man arrived in one vehicle, took items from it and put them in a second vehicle in which he then left. He gave operators the license plate on the second car which came back to a stolen Honda. Driving into the area, Erdman spotted the stolen car on Dishman -Mica Road. After a chase that lasted several minutes, the male suspect jumped out of the still- rolling Honda in a parking lot between Argonne and Mullan Roads. Erdman chased him down on foot and took him into custody with little resistance. Inside the stolen Honda was property that appeared to have been stolen from other vehicles. Other officers went back to the South Herald address and determined that the first car the suspect had driven there was an unreported (not yet discovered by the owner) stolen vehicle. A third stolen vehicle was found in the 1100 block of South Herald. In addition to the two fresh felony charges, the male suspect was also booked on an outstanding Department of Corrections warrant charging him with Escape. Page 10 • Finally, one of our Spokane Valley citizens wrote to the Spokane Valley Police email requesting police presence in his neighborhood, in an effort to cut down some reckless driving that was occurring. He was simply becoming frustrated with the situation. After sending an officer to speak with the citizen, we received a response that was very much appreciated: "I wanted to thank you for having an officer come talk tome. I also wanted to thank you for the presence of officers recently in the Ponderosa. I noticed a difference immediately. All I asked was for them to be around once in awhile to keep the drivers on guard. I know they can't be up here all the time, but I thank you and them for there efforts. " Thank you to the Spokane Valley Police Department's Traffic officers whose presence made the difference. Page 11 2010 MAY CRIME REPORT To date: Yearly totals: May -10 May -09 2010 2009 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 BURGLARY 69 55 372 257 725 753 584 714 744 997 FORGERY 33 14 138 134 297 354 365 334 464 465 MALICIOUS MISCHIEF 118 101 461 447 1245 893 1,265 1,122 904 1,224 NON - CRIMINAL 65 64 349 412 892 944 839 1 811 749 916 PROPERTY OTHER 80 84 330 383 933 828 890 982 1,154 1,665 RECOVERED VEHICLES 34 23 206 75 187 319 343 403 333 390 STOLEN VEHICLES 53 22 215 104 298 496 478 711 603 577 THEFT 191 161 882 877 2162 1,846 1,881 1,888 2,256 2,853 UIOBC 2 0 2 2 4 4 8 11 8 10 VEHICLE OTHER 01 0 1 2 5 7 3 3 5 40 VEHICLE PROWLING 84 41 523 325 920 1069 682 937 958 1,382 TOTAL PROPERTY CRIMES 729 565 3,490 3,018 7,668 7,513 7,338 7,916 8,178 10,519 ASSAULT 84 76 372 373 927 869 853 846 894 880 DOA /SUICIDE 19 12 83 72 210 269 221 1 167 159 164 DOMESTIC VIOLENCE 121 94 507 472 1226 1063 874 736 762 755 HOMICIDE 0 0 0 1 3 3 1 5 1 5 KIDNAP 1 1 8 8 21 16 23 22 35 24 MENTAL 23 34 132 127 310 360 350 425 425 386 MP 13 13 46 45 115 95 83 88 97 106 PERSONS OTHER 137 121 746 638 1621 1,354 1,337 1 1,159 1,256 1,624 ROBBERY 2 2 26 27 75 71 60 58 56 58 TELEPHONE HARASSMENT 6 17 49 75 159 95 73 83 92 190 TOTAL MAJOR CRIMES 406 370 1969 1,838 4,667 4,195 3,875 3,589 3,777 4,192 ADULT RAPE 2 4 15 15 35 44 43 29 39 37 CHILD ABUSE 8 21 44 76 159 148 104 78 101 126 CUSTODIAL INTERFERENCE 18 181 72 56 157 86 92 105 88 205 SEX REGISTRATION F 0 0 0 1 2 3 4 3 6 4 INDECENT LIBERTIES 0 1 2 5 10 11 18 15 9 21 CHILD MOLESTATION 7 1 18 9 35 66 46 69 67 77 CHILD RAPE 61 3 11 19 35 39 31 62 35 30 RUNAWAY 48 44 182 189 440 369 295 309 311 437 SEX OTHER 11 17 77 84 211 179 194 203 1811 162 STALKING 1 1 3 8 15 21 17 17 27 35 SUSPICIOUS PERSON 19 12 97 76 175 142 152 177 244 341 TOTAL SEX CRIMES 120 122 521 538 1271 1,108 996 1,067 1,108 1,475 DRUG 31 46 262 331 670 838 807 665 891 999 ISU OTHER 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 TOTAL ISU 31 46 262 331 671 838 808 665 8911 1,000 TOTAL TRAFFIC REPORTS 248 262 1378 1,357 3,183 3,811 3,800 3,345 2,4031 2,776 TOTAL REPORTS RECEIVED 1,534 1,365 7,6201 7,082 17,460 17,465 16,817 16,582 16,3571 19,962 7 andal y E I° m c m K > Mission ` E 1 E 8 E m S 6`� m o`a India nd 5 cite Y O c U '" U n 21st Jenne acK N _ ° - 2 m ° -. ° Y ` s 25th 27th ' y tia , 2 h n 3 o`a ° m m 1st ¢ o e is eo S* ,feSe 4- m U 29th o' o_ ° 32nd R ' a C ommercial 0 31st 32nd 10 r S 3 o_ U ° 5th 36th E E Y o Burglary o a U z U C do G > 39 E r_A 37th ° point m p Ot 1 o e// I ell Belle Terre u) U O n [if m 42 °' a, w °' ° Meago m N m. y C / ree 41 43 d o Ball J O 2 _ h G/e 44th 44th o4 = L " or 2N °a 45th ° t 44th m O no ork m m M w U 6t. o� 48th Am 2 off o d o L? = 6th K gwth .x'' ao J O e a N �Q LL Be ret ?e r Q 0� o /{� Belle a FG s U c g ® LOW i o hs 6 �i a ey m Ro F ok G'e dac 5 0' p% S p° ?i ?eb -A Medium e d 7th �� Ex0 ry.� o _ st Mohey� v o -F High M P 0 0:5 1 Mile 2010 May Commercial Burglary Hotspots T 08 May 2010 I I Spokane Valley Commercial Burglary 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 l ■ 2007 ■ 2008 2009 ❑ 2010 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Spokane Valley Forgery 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 ■ 2007 ■ 2008 2009 02010 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Spokane Valley Garage Burglary 25 20 15 10 2007 ■ 2008 2009 ❑ 2010 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Spokane Valley Malicious Mischief 200 180 160 140 120 40 20 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY 11 JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC ■ 2007 ■ 2008 2009 ❑ 2010 2500 KCILI 1500 Spokane Valley Property Crimes Comparisons (2010 is through May) ■2007 ■2008 2009 2010 1000 500 C1] Burglary Burglary Mischief Commercial Residential Forgery Malicious Stolen Vehicle Theft Vehicle Prowling Spokane Valley Residential Burglary M 50 40 30 20 10 0 y y y ■ 2007 ■ 2008 2009 132010 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC 7 andal y E I° m c m K > E 6 �r Mission ` E 1 8 E m S nd 5 21st Jet T r~ 25th L 27th @ U o! 0 31st 32nd 1 0 J (7 L o do 37th point N C - N o m E Te esiaentiai urglary /) 1 O 2 m N 3r 42h io.o w I G/ 44th e .A r3 �. 43 d Co a 44th m4 = L 0 45th t hor 6th 48th 4 U T44111 Corke m a �e'o�ry LL Bell PGs U Q O Low CpQe 2 �. ,�� gio z Medium 7thSe Q'�& Co '` Dade = est _,Mohawk m v o High E r Ext y U „_ -- 0 0.5 1Mile 2010 May Residential Burglary Hotspots 08 May 2010 7 andal y Mission ` E 1 E I° m �, c m K > E S 6 nd 5 cite Y O c m Cr `� HPo/ n U 21st Jenne r � a,K ry ` °_ 24th 5 2 ` m o ` 25th y tia s 27th '� , U 2 h m n 3 m m 1st ¢ a ifeSe 32nd CO Ri��e tolen ehicle _ km °fl 29th 0 31st 32nd 1 c 5th 36th 1 (D do c 4 a ° le i \ a U c U m > 391h 2 n 37th point m m p of Merit 1 311 Belle 1� c o key 41 Terre N U O 3 N m m o 42 ° W . 3r t° C7 F. m r m ti C / ree a :5 43 d m °- Ball 0 44th N a _ h G/e c ari 44th Q a 44th m4 = w 6t L " or Z' Y \m 0 °a 45th 6th t Y th m e� � 48th � e gret 4 �e2 'o �ry = LL Q e k qw�i Belle a o/b F \mss N m Low i o4Se C'i ey m Ro deC s F ok pe 2�. p Ai � � � m P° A � m o � � Medium / Q 7th LL a e �� Extr ry.� 0 _ Mohay� m - F High Iv „P 2010 Apri I & May Stolen Vehicle Hotspots o 05 1Mile I I 08 May 2010 Spokane Valley Stolen Vehicles 70 50 40 30 20 10 0 ■ 2007 ■ 2008 2009 02010 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC 250 200 150 100 50 Spokane Valley Theft JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV F W DEC U2007 ■ 2008 2009 ❑ 2010 7 an dal ~ ° m Y ° z uthe in Sanso� c r y Granite � e �. bas o Y - a m S .y OI e � > m o hoot Ilesle O c m E 6 o a Ins 3rd nd 5 '" n U 21st Jenne gy N _ 2 ` m p ia o 25th 27th jy tia 2 h U 3 °ra m 9 if 7 e °o �.. m V ehicle r 29thU c 32nd R��e Prowling °•� o 1st 32nd U ��3 ° 5th d E Y E 36th E o % o m a o c� z U U do 4 ,;a cq U > 39 E 2 37th C7 poin� p Ot i�ell y �. k // 41 Meago z Belle Terre75 U O 3- 4 N d m [if 42 `m C N / roe 43 d Co m A Ball J m a - 3r G/e c t° Q Mari° ~ 44th 44th m4 r = y " hor Z' °ay Y 6th 45th ° t 44th th m a w °� �� 48th �06 x LL e` ret Q e o/b Belle i FGces U c g J Low i e ey r7Q Ro °k�e o�dec 5 4 i . \� °b gio G A P m v 1 Meidurn 9. 57th �� Ext o F Hl9h fU „ P 2010 May Vehicle Prowling Hots M ap Produced: o 0;5 1 Mile I II pots 08 M 8 E Spokane Valley Vehicle Prowling 140 120 100 :I • 1 40 20 0 ■ 2007 ■ 2008 2009 02010 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC