2011, 02-08 Retreat AGENDA
SPOKANE VALLEY CITY COUNCIL
RETREAT/WORKSHOP
Tuesday, February 8,.2011 8:30 a.m.—3:30 p.m.
CenterPlace Regional Event Center
2426 N Discovery Place, Room#213
Spokane Valley, Washington
Please Silence Your Cell Phones During the Meeting
WELCOME: Mayor Towey
RETREAT OVERVIEW: Mike J.
1. ContractingBidding - Caty DriskelhfNeil Kersten (30 minutes)
2. Economic Development—Mike Jackson,Kathy McClung,Ken Thompson (60 minutes)
3. Council Governance Manual Mayor Towey, Bill Gothmann (20 minutes)
4. City Hall Options—Neil Kersten (30 minutes)
5. Setting Law Enforcement Goals—Mike Jackson,Rick VanLeuven, (30 minutes)
LUNCH BREAK 12:00— 12:30—Room 212
6. Financial Matters—Kelt Thompson,Mike Jackson (60 minutes)
7. Council Long-Range Plans—Mayor Towey-Mike Jackson (45 minutes)
8. 2011 Washington State Legislative Agenda—Mayor Towey
9. Snow Removal Recap—Neil Kersten (15 minutes)
10. Solid Waste -Deputy Mayor Schitnmels,Neil Kersten, Cary Driskell (20 minutes)
11. E-Govermnent System—Mike Jackson (15 minutes)
12. Brainstorming--Mayor Towey (45 minutes)
13. Infoi'tnation Only(will not be Yeported or discussed): (a)Business Plan; (b) Workplan
Adjourn
Note: Unless otherwise noted above, there will be no public comments at Council Study Sessions or Workshops. During
meetings held by the City of Spokane Valley Council, the Council reserves the right to take "action" on any item listed or
subsequently added to the agenda. The term "action" means to deliberate, discuss, review, consider, evaluate, or make a
collective positive or negative decision. NOTICE: Individuals planning to attend the meeting who require special assistance to
accommodate physical,hearing,or other impairments,please contact the City Clerk at(509) 921-1000 as soon as possible so that arrangements
may be made.
Retreat Agenda 02-08-11 Page I of 1
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY
ITY .SjGkane CARY P.DRISKELL-ACTING CITY ATTORNEY
'/
Valle ® 11707 East Sprague Avenue Suite 103 • Spokane Valley WA 99206
509.688.0235 ♦ Fax 509.688.0299 ♦ cltyattorney®spokanevalley.org
Memorandum
To: City Council
From: Cary DriskelleM City Attorney `
CC: Mike, Jackson, City Manager
Date: January 26, 2011
Re: Policy Reasons Against Local Bid Preferences — Executive Summary
1. Overview
Staff has been asked to look into policy considerations regarding adopting a local bid
preference. Implementing a policy allowing a local bid preference would likely increase the
overall cost, could eliminate outside vendor participation in bidding, and would be difficult
to enforce and create criteria in order to determine who qualifies as a "local" vendor. The
following section outlines various policy considerations regarding this issue,
II. Policy Considerations
• Local-preference laws and policies are a barrier to interstate commerce. When these laws
have been tested in courts of Illinois, California, New York, and Georgia, they have been
held to be unconstitutional.
• In at least one state, the purchasing authority is prohibited from doing business with any
firm located in a state that has local-preference laws or policies.
• The practice of favoring vendors within a defined geographical area only encourages
inflated prices which are paid by the taxpayers of the jurisdiction who administer them.
Some argue by causing prices to rise, preference results in a direct subsidy to a few
taxpayers at the expense of the general taxpaying public.
• Federal regulations prohibit the granting of federal funds, such as F,A.A., to entities that
have local preference policies used in bidding procedures.
• "Local Preference" can actually discourage local economic development because firms
which might possibly open a local office pursuant to a contract award will not, since they
may be disadvantaged in winning a first contract.
1
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY
Sökane , CARY P.DRISKELL--ACTING CITY ATTORNEY
.000Valley° 11707 East Sprague Avenue Suite 103 • Spokane Valtey WA 99206
509.688.0235 • Fax: 509.688.0299 • cityattorney®spokanevalley.org
— -
City Council Retreat
February 8,2011
Economic Development Options
Economic Development programs can be as simple or complicated as the City decides to make it. The
benefit of having some type of program is that city staff, city council and the community can
define/understand the role of different stakeholders in economic development. The program can be a
tool to focus time and funding for the greatest return, it can be used to establish community priorities
and can create the foundation for future funding opportunities.
Today's discussion is to introduce discussion about an economic development plan, discuss what form
that may take and if time permits, "brainstorm" goals, next steps.
The City of Spokane Valley currently has an Economic Development Chapter of the Comprehensive Plan
and has several agencies within the greater Spokane area that address certain components of economic
development. The City Council may wish to work on a Plan that would update what is currently in place,
assess what is done by outside agencies, adopt goals and policies that look at where the city would like
to be and adopt a work program that addresses the gaps.
City staff visualizes this as a program that can be integrated into services that the City already has in
place.We do not envision a separate department to address economic development; rather it would be
a planning element of the Community Development Department.
Economic Development Plan/Chapter (a sample is attached)
Consistent components of economic development plans provide:
1. Community data that form the foundation for future decisions. Examples include: land analysis,
infrastructure, regional attractions, and general patterns of existing development, schools,
demographics, and existing programs.
2. Needs of business-workforce, infrastructure, tax structure, zoning, etc.
3. Analysis of gaps
4. Future Goals & policies
5. Prioritization and work program
Establish Goals
Potential ideas for goals come from the following concepts:
1. Living wage job creation
2. Tax base enhancements
b. A committee could help draft the plan, review the draft, and/or prioritize a work plan
for council review.
c. A committee can provide a public forum for citizens to bring their business concerns.
d. If a committee is formed, staff recommends building the basic framework for economic
development and Identifying the roles and tasks of the Economic Development
Committee. Then, the committee can be brought on board with specific tasks and
duration.
3. If a committee is formed the City Council should reach agreement about what the committee's
role should be and should adopt a work program.
4. The concept of a plan should be discussed at a future council meeting and direction given to
staff about how the council wishes to proceed.
Economic Development Discussion
11/23/2010 Finance Committee
February 8, 2011 Council Retreat
What is economic development? In particular what is economic development to the City of
Spokane Valley? This is one of the questions to be answered
What is the return on investment? Develop a Benefit/Cost Model. Where would economic
development investments provide the greatest return on the City's dollar?
Quality of life, business recruitment and retention, tourism, family wage jobs, retail,
manufacturing, and international trade may be some of the thoughts people have about economic
development (excerpt Woodinville. Wa).
Note: There are many examples of economic development plans available. For the sake of
discussion-- two were selected here: Woodinville, WA and Madison,Wisconsin. (Note: for
the RETREAT, only the Woodinville plan is provided).
City Role of economic development--This is a decision to be made. There are risks and benefits
to assuming responsibility. There are a variety of options available to the City:
• Maintain Status Quo
• Indentify weaknesses in economic development and encourage other providers to
fill in the gaps i.e. Chamber of Commerce, Greater Spokane Inc. Get more
involved with these groups.
• Public/Private relationships
• Indentify weakness in economic development and take them on as a City
• Strengthen our existing services, i.e. roads and infrastructure,parks and recreation
services,planning and permitting, code enforcement, etc.
Madison Wisconsin economic development plan put it this way:
• What must it do directly as City government?
• What should it contract out?
• When should it be a support player?
• When should it help to build the local
public/private economic development team so
that all benefit?
Another perspective of economic development is
the relationship of economic development to
community development and planning. Using the
analogy of a pie, economic development focuses on
growing the pie through quality job creation and tax
base development. Planning focuses on ensuring
that the community has the right ingredients, such
as land use and infrastructure, integration of
economic and community development, and
policies to guide community growth and
development. Community Development focuses on
distributing the pie.Additional information about
this interrelationship can be found by viewing
Municipal Government Economic Development
Fundamentals in Appendix C.
For these reasons, this plan does not focus on very
important community development issues such as
housing, child care,programs for disadvantaged
youth, or neighborhood retail development. While
each contributes to the overall economic well being
of the community and its development potential, the
purpose of this effort is to focus more directly on
quality job creation. It is through quality job
creation that other vital and critical community
objectives are met.
City of Spokane Valley
We currently do not dedicate staff directly toward business development and business
retention. Instead, the City funds organizations such as Greater Spokane Incorporated and
International Trade Alliance.
We do currently have staff allocated to planning, zoning, and community implementation
Develop Goals for Economic Development
Is any development or business good for the community—are some better for economic
development?
Inventory resources
Greater Spokane Incorporated November 18, 2010 "Boost Your EO"
Healthcare Resource Group relocated from Post Falls to Spokane Valley. Greg
West of HRG said they have "exploding growth." They are hiring 15 new
employees in the next month. Here is what Mr. West listed as the top attractions
to Spokane Valley:
• No state income tax
• Excellent recruiting and retaining of talent pool — large talent pool —
does NOT see an end to the local talent and hiring potential.
• Employment and training opportunities i.e. Workforce Development,
Schools, Colleges, etc.
• Easy to commute from Spokane and Idaho
• Client visits — mentioned he brings them to Mirabeau Park and
surrounding areas. Always plenty to show them and keep them
entertained
• Client perception of the area is positive (he said especially as
compared to Idaho).
• Quality Childcare for employees
• Sense of Community —his staff participates in food drives, volunteers
at the crisis nursery and others.
Community Development `Brainstorming"
Economic Development Ideas
I. City's goals- determine city's goals with community. Is any development or business good
development or business for this community?
2. Zoning Changes
a. Trent Avenue- Look at existing uses and uses permitted. Expand uses and possible
rezones in area. Especially look at small contractors, towing, uses between industrial
and commercial with small accessory offices.
Council Winter Retreat-- January 2010 Economic Development
Brainstorming
Economic Development
Scientific focus groups
Economic Development Strengths
Good water
Rural LandlAg history
Native American contribution
Housing options
Schools
Higher education
Foreign trade zone
Centennial Trail
CenterPlace
Discovery Playground
Land space
Good roads and access
Nice people
Educated workforce
Proximity to downtown & Idaho
Good Police
Recreation resources
Fire Department
Industrial Park
Utilities in place
Challenges
Zoning—kind
Cuizent economy
Money
Low income areas
Challenge of cohesive neighborhoods
Communications
Vehicle for citizen contact& Council
Work with other organizations
How to attract businesses
Water/sewer capacity
State unfunded mandates
Worksheet 1-1 Checklist for evaluating local business environment
( From Economic Development: Strategies for State and Local Practice)
A great many factors shape the local environment. Ten are listed below. Assessing these and other
factors can provide useful information for decision makers. A score can be calculated for each of the ten
factors by totaling the values (Low = 1; Medium =2; High = 3) of the sub-factors. A score above half the
total possible indicates a "High" score for the given factor (e.g., a total score of 5 or higher for Economic
base is a"High" score; a score of 4 or lower is a "Low' score). These scores can be used to determine
areas of strength and weakness in the local economic development environment.
Environmental factors of locality Low(1) Medium (2) High (3)
1. Economic base (Total Score= ) High/Low
a. Lack of dependency on a single firm or industry
b. Capacity to diversify
c. Willingness to diversify
2. Workforce characteristics (Total Score= ) High/Low
a. Workforce size
b. Unemployment rate
c. Proportion in low wage positions
3. Skill (Total Score = ) High/Low
a. Percent competent in technology fields
b. Percent competent in professional fields
4. Land/physical capital (Total Score = ) High/Low
a. Availability of vacant land
b. Availability of underused land
c. Access to utilities (including communication)
d. Access to transportation (highways, airports, etc.)
5. Energy (Total Score = ) High/Low
a. Reliability
b. Access
Next Steps?
CITY OF WOODINVILLE
• .
•
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIC ACTION PLAN
Volume 1 : Strengthening Our Unique
Community & Economy
•
,
•
r1
r. ,..
it .„
..r • I y 4• '
. -.
- . : :.,..
aglimi 'a: -,_ , ' -.-., '..., 41-' ••. 'i.r. + ' 1. i' '--da t
r 0 ' .. •
aro;:L...4 .i.,. Fr• ----' .: . - •:'s t
•.".4'...? .0911 l' lip;'`' . . 4 e
. . •ii. 7_ = 1 i
. .„?...... ... ,. ..“2. -,.. • ..... 7.:.4. A, ..k., fita. ...b Ir.. -1-.0, $ ,. ,i,...,
,..„
. - • •.. ••.,.. ,.... 4,,,.., r
, . ..., .tua.p.....,. ., .... .c.... s., ... -%..)i. .
,. ?..:.
. .._-• . , : ,. .,,,,,,. , . 1. •
• i.
,,,,,st , •..k. . 1. . ita 4 1
_,....• I ='..• .... pr.. . 1
11111111.t..
.. 1 I
. . '-.. --....-
1. .- .. . . . • -. -
' — .
... ... -
. - •
._.A' ' 4)1 , - . .. .., . . - — • - . . . .
. . .
'• 7, ...•- ' .,' •.'1,d.• . :I :,.-.' , , ."•14.' [ • •
•.,.: ''...T.".-4.." ''•A• .' k•
\ • ; --41 .0.J..r .'• i'.--.
, §, .. .. .1j .',. .. •.,...: --
4 viconifV. E "- '-'e,.4-74.4." ''? 1
.•
.'.I •:..• ,:. . . -,•,.... .. -.1.,i',11:..4.. ''.. ., i .:' 1 1. ' ., .: ;i •• tA ' 7
. . . . • • ..::.i....L.......:1 • ill'p.mo,:e6 7, 6-,r i, I ; 1 1.7:1
--• .1 I 7. r 1•.._•*A— Iri .0.• 11 . . N. 6 .4 i • i., .
Olqf 4 III ii Ig..1e...21.1.P.11.17 .: i .4, '1-,....0..1:../.. .ji. . r ./".41h— ,.-'j '1 t l• . — .. t •
•
1 • .
I iY.1-.fi' " 1 ...,!.! . ' . ' I .. 1'.' .• ..:•:;1:J.' '44.11'•'.•: e ' •14'.
P 1 1 11111 • 'L•i I IP HIT taw .. 14.4". - z...i..'.......!.'.4. .-a. k;:7•
I J' LA IP• !. 677.t.,.::ig:• ' 1 ril i_•1!' --i I T.1.1" 4)Il hi . ! .Li •!.' AI'4 '
) .., 1 .. r ,- • . [ ,piji ly1 11 11 1 „:11 IN It 1.%I .,j.-..:...
1 Kr l'i •' 1 ' • . . ',.,Ir: 7•••4-' '' '• :''l WO I I- ' .. -- •- , 'ir....-
6 ._ • ! • .....i..1••••...... '• 'j:i. : 1" ii •• IP • • 1
i1 '...r -. ' '
p
.• I
. ._. _ ... . . . i .
1 - ' : ' . . . -- .--. __. _=•-•■-•=•.„,
illY001r4rT. • . .
Adopted January 2008 r r, 1 Fi :: ,... .•-•..: :_,()( I .\ i 1 :,
CONTENTS
Volume I z Strengthening Our Unique
Community and Eco n o m
Introduction 1
Overarching Themes 7
Summary of Goals and Strategies 8
The Plan 9
Goal I 9
Goal II 15
Goal III 17
Goal IV 19
Goal V 21
Appendix 27
Volume 2 Technical Annex
Principal Inputs
Economic Development Profile
Stakeholder Interview Results
Fiscal Implications of Land Use Alternatives
Public Comment
Summaries of Existing Documents and Policies
North King County Economic Survey - Executive Summary
Existing Policy Direction for Economic Development
Downtown and Little Bear Creek Corridor Master Plan
Development Economics of Mixed-Use with Higher Density
Quality of Life Issues
Vacant and Redevelopable Land Use Data
Summaries of Findings and Potential Related Strategies
Situation Assessment
Key Issues and Potential Strategies
Key Findings and Corollary Strategic Themes
Plan Introduction
Economic Development Planning Framework
Economic Vitality
• City's economic outlook and fiscal balance
• Position the City for new tax initiatives
• Infrastructure improvements
7../..............----4
, • Support for existing businesses
• Attract businesses to match community needs
Image & Identity
• Sense of place&community
• Unique&valued natural resources
• Quality development&managed growth
• High level of municipal service
• Regional cooperation
Livability &
Quality of Life
• Transportation/mobility options
• Housing options
• Quality schools&educational opportunities
• Parks,open space,trails&recreation
• Environmental stewardship
• Arts&culture
Copyright Berk&Associates 2005,all rights reserved
With implementation of this Plan through the concerted efforts of the
City of Woodinville and community partners, it is hoped that the following
outcomes will be seen over the coming years:
• A vital and diverse mix of businesses drawing from historic strengths
and targeting desirable new sectors
• An array of strong locally owned small- and medium-sized
businesses, with active civic participation by business owners
• A high quality of life for City residents, with heightened attention
to transportation, parks, recreation opportunities, schools and a
respected natural environment
• A vibrant, pedestrian-oriented, neighborhood-scale Downtown with
environs and retail uses that complement the Tourist District
• High quality development with a distinct Woodinville character
consistent throughout the City
Adopted January 2008
Plan Introduction
The Task Force was supported by Carl Smith, Woodinville City Planner,
and Brian Murphy of Berk & Associates, as well as other City and Berk &
Associates staff.
The Goals and Strategies encapsulated in the following pages are based
on a wealth of quantitative and qualitative information presented to the
Task Force. Throughout the body of this Plan, the analytic support for key
strategies is presented in exhibits housed in this document's Appendix.
A comprehensive analysis of the City's demographic, economic, market
and land use conditions was encapsulated in a report titled Woodinville
Economic Development Profile. The City's fiscal conditions and the
impacts of various land use choices were captured in another report titled
Fiscal Implications of Land Use Alternatives. Another important input for
consideration by the Task Force was the summary of 30 interviews with a
diverse range of stakeholders,including City staff,developers, local business
owners, residents and representatives of various community organizations.
Additional public input was gained at a Public Open House held on August
17, 2005.
In addition to the original research described above, summaries of existing
documents and reports were also presented to the Task Force, including
the 2005 North King County Economic Survey, existing policy direction
for economic development (including the Woodinville Vision Statement
and Mission Statement; the City Council's 2005-2006 Economic
Development Goal; and the Economic Development Element of the City's
Comprehensive Plan), the Downtown and Little Bear Creek Master Plan,
Development Economics of Mixed-Use with Higher Density, quality of life
issues(including current and future plans for parks and recreation facilities),
and land use data related to vacant and redevelopable lands.
The information contained in the many sources listed above was compiled
into a small number of summary documents which helped to focus Task
Force discussion and the eventual development of the Plan's Goals,
Strategies and priorities.The results -
of these reports are included in r,
this Plan's Volume 2, the Technical •
Annex. 'F' ' 4.
•
••
:i ;1 ,� 4
n LIN,
(Adopted January 2008
Plan Introduction
Picture a city, in a valley, along a river, nestled among parks, hills
and fields.
Picture a pedestrian-friendly village of mixed uses linking a robust 1 " " , - . at:,i'
Downtown to a historic and attractive tourism district through c • . . - l •
working farms and picturesque fields by a network of interpretive e''
trails and various modes of transportation. • ..'. + ;
So well-designed, this is a place where everyone who works here
can live here and everyone who lives here can work here. `'_
Imagine the possibilities of a city government :, t , : ~. . '
• �
working in partnership with an enthusiastic •WY.',.
citizen base and resourceful business partners 4.i.:,}?;' '.: +{.
to grow the city and its resources in a unified, ., ,�;,,, • ..
sustainable and responsible fashion. z, - ; - . •
Here, Woodinville becomes a place where the . ''. `,:; ''ti M ,,
natural meets the innovative, where residents, + f . ' `.
visitors and businesses alike are encouraged '.:,•4•2.,: f '
4M15 4 Fy� ��'f � .-":177'
to share their lives, build their community and -- f k {
exchange the benefits of commerce. t ;r' -
Ric,. .Its. ,` •
.,. t ;,....x.z-z.e. .. ,•.
i w�L . 'y am . .-- '� ii. X��'.• t
1 t iF yI. .
•
Adopted January 20061
Summary of Goals and Strategies
I. Grow the City's Diverse and Vital Mix of Businesses
Priority 1. Focus business attraction and retention efforts on target sectors
Priority 2. Invest in basic infrastructure and quality of life enhancements appropriate to targeted sectors
Priority 3. Continue to improve the City's business climate
Priority 4. Expand Woodinville's unique retail position
Priority 5. Connect businesses and developers with vacancies
Priority 6. Support small business, professional businesses, and business that serve minority populations
Priority 7. Support workforce development activities
II. Ensure Future Development Advances the City's Vision
Priority 1, Encourage Downtown development that promotes the established Vision: higher density, high
quality,well-designed mixed-use development with upscale retail and pedestrian-oriented
streetscapes
Priority 2. Practice "proactive zoning": reevaluate and modify land use zoning to meet City fiscal goals and
Vision
III. Enhance Woodinville's Livability for a Range of Residents
Priority 1. Increase housing options for residents and workers
Priority 2. Ensure that City policies are family-friendly
Priority 3. Enhance the City's parks, trails and "green canopy"
Priority 4. Engage local businesses as strategic partners in making Woodinville a better place to live and
work
Priority 5. Build community and promote neighborhood cohesiveness
IV. Grow and Benefit from the City's Tourism Sector
Priority 1. Focus on a range of tourism draws including wine, agritourism, food, and active recreation
Priority 2. Connect wine tourism, agritourism and active recreation uses to Downtown
Priority 3. Encourage complementary tourism and retail uses in the Tourist District and Downtown
respectively
Priority 4. Enhance the City's attractiveness as an extended destination
V. Promote the City's Image and Identity
Priority 1. Adopt and implement a compelling and cohesive Woodinville brand, emphasizing the special
qualities that residents, businesses and visitors find attractive
Priority 2. Launch a marketing campaign building on the City's brand
I� _
B
Adopted January 2008
Goals and Strategies
A Strategic Mix of Amenities and Incentives to Retain and Attract Desired Business
Woodinville can draw on many tools to retain existing businesses and attract businesses in the target sectors
described on the prior page.While the City must evaluate each opportunity individually,weighing benefits
and costs and selecting the most strategic tool to employ, this Plan establishes the overarching principle
that the provision of amenities — in the form of an attractive environment and a high quality of life -- is
preferable to the use of incentives such as reductions or waivers of development fees and regulations.
Woodinville's most valuable and attractive asset is its quality environment. Amenities such as parks, open
spaces, trails and recreation facilities; quality schools; efficient vehicular and non-vehicular circulation; a
cohesive built environment and a beautiful natural environment; and excellent public safety services are
attractive to both residents and businesses. Moreover, these amenities depend on significant investments
from business in the form of fees and compliance with development regulations.
Retaining businesses and attracting new businesses by maintaining a high quality community requires
balancing the provision of these amenities with the limited use of incentives which reduce the costs that
growth or development would otherwise pay.Such incentives may include permitting process assistance or
expedited permitting;flexibility in permitting or impact fees;flexibility in development regulations,particularly
height limits; and City investments in site improvements, transportation infrastructure or utilities.
By offering a quality environment with attractive amenities, a friendly community, a welcoming business
climate (addressed in Goal 1, Priority 3 and elsewhere), the opportunity for synergistic clustering of similar
businesses, and a ' Vision" that establishes a clear understanding of the City's future, Woodinville is in a
strong position to attract desired businesses without overly relying on incentives.
From Wineries to a Woodinville Wine Cluster
Woodinville's wineries are one of the City's greatest assets — and one of its principal opportunities. This Plan
establishes strategies to expand the City's wine-based tourism, and to connect winery visitors to the City's existing
and future retail businesses.
The City has,as well,an opportunity to cultivate a cluster of wine-and agritourism-related businesses.The Woodinville
area currently features more than 20 wineries,but few of the services that support these wine makers.As the scale
of its wine industry expands, the City will be an attractive location for a wine-based cluster of businesses that
provide the inputs and supports the industry depends on,and which it now imports from elsewhere.
The following businesses should be targeted as part of the City's business attraction efforts and be considered in
supportive strategies such as infrastructure investments, workforce development and marketing and promotion:
• Producers and distributors of barrels, wine making equipment, bottles, corks, labels, boxes and other inputs
• Downstream distributors and marketers
• Businesses in related industries such as wine-related research and education, restaurants, catering companies
and cooking schools
To support this cluster, relevant educational and workforce training opportunities should be made available.These
opportunities should be encouraged through partnerships with local educational institutions, with a local college
becoming a partner in Washington State University's Viticulture and Enology Education Consortium.
i tr
Adopted January 200a
Goals and Strategies
c. Develop a Woodinville Broadband
Strategy, based on an assessment Strategic Options for the Future of Woodinville's
of unmet needs and desired Broadband Strategy
outcomes and consistent with other Strategy must guide any informed public policy, and assessment
municipalities and federal initiatives of unmet needs guides strategy.After this assessment is made
and policy [see sidebar] and related priorities established,Woodinville's Broadband
Strategy will fall into one or more of the following strategic
Priority 3. Continue to improve the categories, none of which are mutually exclusive:
City's business climate • Maximize symmetric bandwidth
A. Encourage economic development a This strategy maximizes the capacity of the network,
as a central or overarching City supporting highly interactive applications
priority a The laying of fiber optic cable throughout the City would
be expensive and disruptive to, but would provide
I. Establish a standing committee excellent access well into the future
to focus exclusively on • Provide universal access
economic development a In order to allow all citizens have equal access to
initiatives, with high-level information, this strategy uses new network technology
representatives from the City, that is compatible with current systems
Chamber of Commerce and o King County's $15 million wireless project in White
other key stakeholders * Center is an example of this type of strategy
ii. Actively engage the participation • Enable ubiquitous computing
of City departments and By creating a Woodinville WIMAX network, free and
partners needed for the seamless wireless connectivity would be enabled
implementation of this Plan anywhere in the City
iii. Maintain an attractive, a This is a very inexpensive network technology that
informative website dedicated requires no disruption of existing streets to lay fiber
cables
to promoting economic
development * Under any of the above strategies, it is important to evaluate
the costs and benefits of installing such a network, and the
B. Continue to reinforce a customer appropriate role for the City. Public-private partnerships may be
service orientation in all City a very suitable mechanism by which to pursue this infrastructure
services investment.
I. Continue to conduct periodic
customer satisfaction surveys to
gauge the City's performance in
providing public services *
c. Ensure regular and open City-business communications through
proactive outreach; be responsive to business concerns
Adapted January 2008
Goals and Strategies
Priority 6. Support small business, professional businesses, and
business that serve minority populations
A. Preserve lower cost incubator space through zoning and
incentives *
B. Partner with the Chamber and local educational institutions to
provide business support programs
I. Be a supportive partner in the development of a UW
entrepreneurship center *
Work with the Chamber to create a business assistance
center for small businesses *
c. Allow warehouse businesses to utilize more
space for retail sales [see sidebar] * Allowance for Additional Retail Uses
in Industrial Zones
D. Conduct regular business outreach to
understand how the City can ease the Business in the City's industrially zoned land can
challenges of local small businesses, currently use no more than 10% of their floor
responding to significant concerns * space for retail purposes. By allowing greater
retail usage, the City allows these businesses,
i. Assess impacts of the City's sign ordinances some of which are start-up wineries,to diversify
on small businesses their revenue streams. The City is also expected
ii. Assess and mitigate the impact of to benefit, as under anticipated implementation
transportation impact fees to small of Sales Tax Streamlining, tax revenues from
business viability retail uses will be greater than revenues from
industrial uses.To address parking and traffic
iii. Assess difficulties facing minority-owned circulation concerns, greater retail usage may be
businesses, including language barriers and made contingent on the availability of adequate
access to City services traffic circulation and parking infrastructure,
iv. Assess the workforce skills and education
desired by local businesses
Priority 7. Support workforce development
•
activities .,
A. Partner with Cascadia Community College; _ f r 1
the University of Washington, Bothell; Lake ' ' : t
Washington Technical colleges and other ' ; ' 't
institutions to provide and promote workforce — &It jI —
development programs appropriate to the
targeted sectors established in Goal 1, �{Priority 1 .' r .'
r5
(page 9) * ,h► •t
•
Adopted January Oflfi
Goals and Strategies
iii. Encourage village scale mixed-use — T;
development with specialty retail,
Class A office space, and multifamily .-
housing ,. . }
n targeted � •
a. Recruit businesses i in targ t _�1 ..
sectors to develop mixed-use • r • • z
facilities as satellite offices * 'On - • '•
iv. Encourage development of small- . I Allrill111111 �.
scale office space above retail � � ` Niki, –
• •Priority 2. Practice "proactive zoning": u_ f }LP ∎
reevaluate and modify land use
zoning to meet City fiscal goals and Vision
A. Assess current land use zoning and permitted uses and their
fiscal implications for the City given expected future trends,
including sales tax streamlining [Exhibit 2-1] *
B. Modify zoning as necessary to most appropriately respond to
market demand given fiscal goals and the City's Vision
i. Consider expanded retail and tourism-related uses in the
South industrial area *
ii. Concentrate industrial and large-scale retail in the North
Industrial area *
C. Cultivate distinct but complementary district identities [Exhibit
2-2]
16
Adopted January 2008
Goals and Strategies
Priority 4. Engage local businesses as strategic partners in making
Woodinville a better place to live and work
A. Involve the business community in civic duties, creating a culture of According to the North
business participation King County Survey 84%
of the leaders of local
B. Recognize the contributions of local businesses businesses live locally
C. Enlist the support of local businesses to vigorously seek funding for
a range of transportation options for Woodinville
a Encourage innovative approaches by businesses for connecting
employees with their workplaces, such as satellite offices, flexible
work hours and telecommuting
E. Support businesses in adopting "Sustainable Development' [see
sidebar] practices, with a broad goal of ensuring that community
development not only enhances
the local economy, but also the
local environment and quality of Sustainable Development
life Sustainable Development has many definitions. The following
are a few examples:
Priority 5. Build community and
promote neighborhood • Development that meets the needs of the present without
cohesiveness compromising the ability of future generations to meet their
own needs
A. Work with neighborhood groups • Seeking improved public health and a better quality of
to understand their priorities life for all of a community's residents by limiting waste,
preventing pollution, maximizing conservation and
B. Continue to provide Small promoting efficiency and developing local resources to
Neighborhood Action Project revitalize the local economy
(SNAP) grants
• The ability to make development choices which respect the
c. Hold City-wide and neighborhood relationship between the three "E's" : economy, ecology and
events equity:
o Economy: Economic activity should serve the common
D. Celebrate the diversity of the area good, be self-renewing, and build local assets and self-
through City-sponsored events reliance
E. Use signs to enhance o Ecology: Humans are part of nature, nature has limits
neighborhood identity and communities can benefit from protecting and
building natural assets
F. Promote use of the Community Equity:The opportunity for full participation in all
Center as the City's central 4 activities, benefits and decision-making of society
gathering place
Adopted January 2008
Goals and Strategies
Priority 3. Encourage complementary tourism and retail uses in
the Tourist District and Downtown respectively
A. Promote the development of additional wineries and food-
oriented businesses
B. Encourage family-friendly tourism uses in the Central Business
District
I. Attract artisans to Downtown as well as the Tourism District
ii, Promote the use of and explore the expansion of athletic
fields
c. Promote agritourism by actively partnering with the Farmers
Market, the Sammamish Valley Farmland Trust, the Sammamish
Valley Alliance, and the Sammamish Valley Grange
D. Evaluate expanding the Tourism Overlay into the South Industrial
Zone to promote the expansion of tourism uses *
Priority 4. Enhance the City's attractiveness as an : ..1.4-,;,,T,, --. .,R,,, . • -
extended destination -, ' . } M i
•
't; —.---'e
A. Actively recruit the development of independently owned Ik.f ;_ . .,•+ ,,_ - .
mid-level lodging and a variety of food related industry . ;) ..'4
(cooking schools, catering, etc.) options * � r ' ',., 4'
4. • 4 .4 -• T.1 -T:',. . ii„.. ,..:
'' l' .- ,4xi� ti -•
• j 4k . . .0..:113 it,
• Its irtriA%kp ,. .44,i
k iflf,, h T.
v. �I `{ fir';-,y 'M1}f „s
•-.4r.. % --'tit,Zi4= ��+
i
'J(I
#Adopte€! January 2008
Coals and Strategies
Priority 2. Launch a marketing campaign building on the City's
brand
A. Develop a City Marketing Plan to coordinate complementary
messages to key audiences *
i. Draw from stakeholder input received during creation of the
Economic Development Plan
Involve City staff, the private sector, the Chamber of
Commerce and citizen committees
iii. Seek partnerships and grants to support implementation of
the Marketing Plan
B. Reinforce the City's core strengths in marketing
messages k .: �
i. Name the infrastructures, facilities, services, - . • "`* *� 4
telecommunications, cultural landscape and •- { �',{� ~
entertainment amenities we have to offer
as a City and region , F .•
•
ii. Reinforce elements of quality of life and ��.;•r? •
sustainable development in all strategies . " `.+^ �
C. Market Woodinville as an interesting and ; ,
accessible tourism destination +i {u* r
i. Incorporate Woodinville's multiple _' '� ' I • .T Re, .." r •
complementary tourism draws: wine1+ ,
agritourism, food, and active recreation _-= '
ii. Partner with Seattle and Bellevue hotels _. ."
Coordinate with Eastside cities to promote �111•
the sub-region as a tourism destination T.
ire-4 it7
Fi
Adopted January 2000
&L'rPIPEABiVA
This Appendix excerpts key exhibits from the
Woodinville Economic Development Strategic Action Plan Volume 2: Technical Annex.
Share of Jobs by Sector, 2003
100%- _
J ri Government
I Education
7 +
00% - rlqR‘ — -
° hi Retail
Ca'
70%-- - 3 ° I Finance,Insurance,
Real Estate
60%- — - 159/5 -
50% -
10%
40% — _ Services
30%—2f —
4c
yak
20% _ _ Wholesale Trade,
h 74b ^� a 5t 0•�—air° Transport Utilities
I BRb 125h
15°$ 114R— Manufacturing
10%— Iggb—..¢lh 12Rb �� � g
t!rC! 1:y ►����� x.i� t p, t.:;i f Construction&
096 }•...� — i' "I IP 4 1c1 f'x. l r't_ t Resources
Woodinville I Redmond I Edmonds I Monroe North King I Central Puget
4 County Sound
Bothell Kirkland Mill Creek Issaquah Incorporated
King County
Neighbors Peers
Source: Puget Sound Regional Council,Washington State Employment Security Department, 2005
Adopted January 2000
Appendix
Retail Sales Index, 2004
Retail Sales Index
0.0=Regional Average)
Apparel
7.0 6.4
6.0
Total,
5.0 Furniture& Excluding
General Home Restaurants All Retail Building&
4.0 Merchandise -Furnishings-&-Bars 3.5
Aut.
3,3 3,2 3.2 Misr. 3,3
3.0
3.0 - Food
2.1
2.0
• Autos 0.7&Gas ,J
1.0 -- i 3
.
Apparel/ Furniture/ Miscellaneous Auto Dealers/ Retail Excluding
Accessories I Furnishings/ I Retail Stores I eas Stations I Bldg Materials
Equip and Autos
General Eating/Drinking Food Total Retail
Merchandise Places Trade
Source:Department of Revenue,2005
Taxable Retail Sales Per Capita, 2004*
(2904 5)
545,000
540,000 - - - .-
535,000
530,000 __
525,000
320,000
$15,000 - - - --
$10,000 • r
35,000 11-1-11-1-1 - I�-
JO
Inc Kin Central
Woodinville Bothell Redmond Kirkland Edmonds M111 Creek Monroe Issaquah North King County Puget
Sound
TRS Per Capita $24,559 88,164 816,170 $19,191 57,570 86,896 $12,457 838,568 $7,716 $11,832 88,637
2004 Taxable Retail Sales(Millions) $244 $253 $758 $879 $300 888 5193 8598 5969 516,937 827,441
2004 Population 9,915 30,930 46,900 45,800 39,620 12,760 15,480 15,510 125,525 1,431,505 3,177,100
*Lumber and Other Building Materials(SIC code 521)is excluded from all TRS totals.Inclusion of this sub-category would skew the results
given the substantial level of wholesale sales in this sub-sector in Woodinville,Additional wholesale activity is likely represented in other sub-
sectors,which may cause minor skewing.
Source: Department of Revenue,Berk&Associates,2005
28
Adopted January 200B
Appendix
Exhibit 1-4
In January, 2004, the Planning
Commission recommended to
the City Council a draft Downtown Woodinville Downtown Master Plan Zoning
and Little Bear Creek Corridor
Master Plan. The draft Plan contains
recommendations to implement -
the City's vision to "create a vibrant, A 1 t
compact downtown Woodinville that 0 I uue...1 — -
is an inviting place to work,shop, live \
and socialize! . . "
Key features of the Plan include - {
recommendations for: l , ,
• "Mixed-use" development •
and multi-family housing to ,
encourage a more pedestrian- _ y -k
oriented environment . ; '
I . _ r
• New permitted uses in the ■ >.. ' ':' -
General Business zone to "`m' ! ` _ "
encourage business and �� ;�, ""„'rC`""'
C IrNil[.imil'
employment opportunities that I `”"
leh era Gs.:.l � '� ��
are well-designed and built in k «,l:r." , ._1
an environmentally friendly way f;,
• New grid streets to improve . '+ / +'' \. ° i +>>�� l
traffic flow l + ' -'
1 1'a'.`,!1 I / i ,11
• New pedestrian and bicycle ,";`ANA ;
pathways to connect downtown j 'f'r.°:!'•."'l � - ,,: + !f AF=.t
with other areas and provide -_ . •-• `""''":"'"'' —
non-motorized transportation i �'{.'•options , - ,%./ , -.,rret
• Environmental enhancements Trr e,Y1r1"' ,�_
for Little Bear and Woodin 1 Gr '.• •
•
n �:��'F',�
Creeks ../ I+4114 �,t54 l F7LIIY:J`iLJ
F� 1 15' 7k'. _l � �'�x��s'Fa j LY•• Additional parks and open '' _• ! +� to
space rf 4 sf r;'':;',r r' `cc tsnsrl
�:r f•:u 1'ii
�V.EC7rtireit
The complete draft Plan can be .r.;•
viewed at the City's website: f
http://www.ci.woodinville.wa.us
30 •
Adopted January 2008
Appendix
Exhibit 2-3
Employment Distribution
• Most Woodinville employment is located in the North Industrial, Town
Center, and Valley Industrial neighborhoods.
• The largest employers are located in the two industrial
neighborhoods.
• A smaller cluster of employment is located in the Tourist District.
Neighborhood Employment Distribution, 2003
' '- � • - __—
fT
• I .
.~ wits • .VAs4
I Wi'll•.i . NCRru \.ti`Ii.:4.1+.I'' tiA{CLLItir,T iN •
UOTI-11:11' k1C1.11S.IPI. .1 I 1
I . ' . i
, i . 4710 Ii- ',k.'...7. .. . . • . •
I
s. , ' ' • iwoomNVI}U 1
• • ,..• •, ; fiFI.111 '
I
.41-1 LEOTA l •
' 1. 1-P ' iti I 1 iyy' I .I
. I . I • ' �
(.J VA!i6.4' •.
Etl[r11Si4l1L +
•l]['1'4H .
11li s l I-0 �Ck •
• I11nGr.• �VES7 •
flloc:l TOUnisl,
111f1H1r14';) l +'k .
• • i y % Ntinllbcr al En�pIo}•ccE
pei Cs1. .1 c11 111hh1
•
• • HI(1 i•,.s•
' iI I1,
I
• •• • • I_ � (4.)
Source: Puget Sound Regional Council, 2005
Adopted January 2008
Exhibit 3-2
Population
Historic Population Growth
and Population Forecasts
Projected
Woodinville Population 1993 2000 2004 2030
OFM 7,833 9,915
US Census 9,809
PSRC Based Forecast 13,222
Average Annual Growth Rate 3.3% 0.3% 1.1%
Source: US Census, 2000,Office of Financial Management, 2004 & Puget Sound
Regional Council, 2003
Adopted January 2008
•
Appendix
Multifamily Housing Units as a Percentage of All Housing Units, 2000
60%- - --
49-b 50'k
50%
43%
344b 3545 34;6
3246 3256
3055 27' I
27%
10% — — !/
•
I
Woodlnvllie I Redmond I Edmonds I Monroe I North King I Central Puget
County Sound
Bothell Kirland Mill Creek Issaquah Incorporated
King County
Neighbors Peers
Source:Office of Financial Management,2004
Owner Occupied Multifamily Housing Units
as a Percentage of All Multifamily Housing Units, 2000
40% - --
35%
35% — - -33..1
32% 32%
31?'0
30S4 - emy'a iift '- tlaa
16%
15% - 1
r T
10% - Or t I
Nh
546 Illi
Dab
Woodinville Redmond Edmonds I Monroe North King Central Puget
County Sound
Bothell Kirkland MII1 Creek Issaquah Incorporated
King County
Neighbors Peers
Source:US Census,2000
36
Adopted January 200B
Appendix
Percentage of Total Households by Household Income, 1999
10665 - - —UIII_
9a"w { Eli Over 75K
4o-.. —
lax, � -
60% —. _24°•° - 2241 50K to 75K
21 S
24% 21 ° 23".11
5045 7'-,» 20;b
22=.'] 22`'0 20'<1,
4-045 35K to 50K 11 4445 — l5,�
{
3.. �_i :::i iMb . —
1
055
Woodinville I Redmond I Edmonds I Monroe I North King I Central Puget
County Sound
Bothell Kirkland Mill Creek Issaquah Incorporated
King County
Neighbors Peers
30
Adopted January 2008
Appendix
Exhibit 4-1
Appeal of Woodinville as a Place to Visit
North King Lake
County Bothell Kenmore Forest Park Shoreline Woodinville
Appeal of the
city as a place 6.35 6.32 4.73 6.44 5.88 7.69
to visit
On a scale from 1-10,with 10 being the most appealing place to visit
Source: North King County Economic Survey, Hebert Research, 2005
40
Adopted January 2008
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: 02-08-2011 City Manager Sign-off:
Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑public hearing
❑ information ® admin. report ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Governance Manual Revisions
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Council generally reviews the Governance Coordination
Manual annually to determine if there is a need to make any changes, and minor changes were made
recently concerning tele-video conferencing. The Governance Committee will be meeting soon to discuss
proposed changes with the idea of presenting council with those ideas during regular council meetings so
that all councilmembers will have an opportunity to review and discuss the manual section by section.
BACKGROUND:
Some changes to consider for this manual include:
• Adding a section on Executive Sessions(to include what can be discussed during those meetings)
• Adding a separate exhibit for"Quick Parliamentaiy Procedure"(making, seconding, amending
motions,etc.)
• Adding a section on"Agenda Committee"--which references the meetings occurring now with
the Mayor, Deputy Mayor,City Manager and City Clerk as a pre-agenda meeting to go over the
council agenda for the following night's meeting.
• Clearer explanation for how to add something to any agenda, existing or future
• Some clarifying comments and questions
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS:
STAFF/COUNCIL CONTACT: Mayor Towey
ATTACHMENTS
Spokane CITY
}
%Talley® 11707 E Sprague Ave Suite 106 4 Spokane Valley WA 99206
509.921.1000 4 Fax: 509.921.1008 A cityhall®spokanevalley.org
Council Goal
Explore a Range of Options for a City Hall
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: 02-08-2011 City Manager Sign-off:_
Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑public hearing
❑ information n adrnin, report ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Setting Law Enforcement Goals
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN:
BACKGROUND: As per the new Interlocal Agreement for Costs Incident to Law Enforcement
Services, dated August 17, 2010, under 9.3.1,the City Manager and the Police Chief will work together to
establish goals for police services which reflect specific needs within our city. Staff is seeking Council
discussion concerning these goals.
Also, the County has reduced the 2011 shared services by 6.5 positions. Per the attached 2010 & 2011
Commissioned Officer Worksheets, staff is seeking Council discussion concerning performance
measures which may relate to these reductions.
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS:
STAFF/COUNCIL CONTACT: Mike Jackson
ATTACHMENTS Pages 8 & 9 of the Interlocal Agreement for Costs Incident to Law Enforcement
Services — concerning 9.3.1; 2010 Commissioned Officer Worksheet; 2011 Commissioned Officer
Worksheet.
8.4 Patrol Districts. CITY's Police Chief will establish patrol districts within CITY in
order to assure accurate collection of data related to criminal traffic activity. The patrol
districts will coincide within CITY limits as closely as possible without compromising
efficient use of reactive patrol deputies. A patrol district is a geographical area of a size and
configuration designed to minimize response times to citizen's calls for services. Response
is typically measured from the time a call is received to the time the unit arrives on the
scene,
8.5 Dedicated Patrol Units. SHERIFF recognizes that it is providing sworn police
services dedicated to CITY. In so doing, the law enforcement services shall be dedicated
to CITY and shall not be used elsewhere within COUNTY. Provided however, in the
event of an emergency or a call by a deputy for assistance, mutual aid may be rendered.
SECTION NO. 9: CITY POLICE CHIEF AND PRECINCT COMMANDER
SELECTION, REMOVAL AND DUTIES, AS WELL AS CITY MANAGER'S
RESPONSIBILITIES THERETO.
9.1 Selection of Police Chief or Precinct Commander. When, for any reason, there
occurs a vacancy in the position of Police Chief or Precinct Commander, the SHERIFF
shall designate three or more SHERIFF Deputies of the rank of Lieutenant or higher, or
as otherwise agreed by the parties, as candidates for each of the positions of CITY Police
Chief or Precinct Commander. The positions of Police Chief or Precinct Commander
shall be appointed from said lists of qualified candidates by the City Manager.
9.2 Removal of Police Chief or Precinct Commander.
9.2.1 Removal by SHERIFF. The SHERIFF may remove the Police Chief or
Precinct Commander at any time after consultation with the City Manager.
9.2.2 Removal By City Manager. The SHERIFF shall remove the Police Chief
or Precinct Commander at any time after the written request and consultation of
the City Manager.
9.2.3 Reduction of Precinct Commander's Rank Due to Economic Conditions.
A reduction in Sheriff's Office Civil Service Rank due to economic necessity shall
not be the sole basis for the removal of the appointed Precinct Commander by
either the City Manager or the SHERIFF.
9.3 Duties of Police Chief. The Police Chief shall report to the City Manager or his/her
designee and to the existing command structure within SIIERIFF's Office.
The duties of the Police Chief shall include:
Page 8 of 18
9.3.1 Working with the City Manager or his/her designee to establish goals,
objectives and performance measures for CITY police services which reflect specific
needs within CITY;
9.3.2 Coordinating police activities within CITY, including hours of operation and
CITY specific protocols and procedures, attending meetings and providing reports as
requested by the City Manager and such other duties common to a City Police Chief
including enforcement of CITY codes and ordinances;
9.3.3 Reviewing the performance of deputies assigned to CITY. Reporting to CITY
Manager or his/her designee and SHERIFF any serious recommendations for
performance improvement;
9.3.4 Identify duties of deputies assigned to CITY as specific needs arise or as
requested by the City Manager or his/her designee within the context of established
policies and procedures. Reporting to SHERIFF any changes in duty of CITY
assigned deputies;
9.3.5 Overseeing implementation within CITY of all SHERIFF policies and
procedures. Maintaining a copy of SHERIFF procedures on file at City Hall for
CITY'S reference. SHERIFF shall be notified of any public disclosure requests to
view or obtain a copy of the policies and procedures on file.
9.3.6 Notifying the City Manager or his/her designee of any change in SHERIFF
procedures or policies, or resource as permitted by this agreement;
9.3.7 Identifying areas of supplemental training for deputies assigned to CITY.
Making recommendations to SHERIFF for supplemental training. Making
recommendations to the City Manager or his/her designee for training not provided
by SHERIFF;
9.3.8 Providing supervision and direction to the Precinct Commander, Lieutenants
and Sergeants assigned to CITY as well as other assigned personnel, and acting as
liaison with SHERIFF Command Staff;
9.3.9 Maintaining communication between the City Manager and SHERIFF
command structures to ensure that changes in SHERIFF policies are agreeable to
CITY and that change in CITY policies are agreeable to SHERIFF. In the event a
CITY procedure, policy, goal or operation differs from the SHERIFFS, CITY
Manager or his/her designee, SHERIFF and COUNTY shall meet and mutually
determine which policy will prevail; and
Page 9 of 18
Sheriffs Office-2010
Commissioned Officer Worksheet
Total Commissioned FTE_ 236.00
Total included in Commissioned Officer Charge: 217.67
Excludes those allocated along with administrative costs and those that are County responsibility.
2010
Category 2
Shared Services
Investigative!
Community Services/K-9
Major Crimes
Captain
Lieutenant
Sergeant
Detectives
Sex Crimes
Sergeant
Detectives
Property Crimes TF
Sergeant
Detectives
Deputies
1
5.i
4
ISUICIUIDECIJTTF/Meth%IDTF% _
Lieutenant 1.30
Sergeant 1.00
Detectives 6.83
Deputies 2.25
Gang Enforcement
Sergeant
Detective/Corp
Deputies
Total Investigative
Intellelligence Led Policing
Deputies
1.00
2.00
37.92
Marine/Search Rescue
Deputies 1.75
K-9
Deputies
I r otar investigative/Support Sery 45.67
City 2010 Final CCM 06-30-10 Comm Officer Worksheet
Category 3
Allocated with
Administrative Costs
Command Staff
Undersheriffs
PIO
Sergeant
Training/OPS
Lieutenant
Sergeant
Deputies
2
2
1
2
Total Administrative 8
Category 4
County Responsibility!
Other Cost Recovery Method
Civil
Lieutenant
Deputies
Marine Patrol
Deputy
DEA
Detective/Corp
DTF
Detective/Corp
Deputies
0.25
1.50
0.75
Sex Off.Res.Verif.
Detective/Corp 0.15
Sex Off.Res.Verif.SA03
Detective/Corp 1.00
WA Meth Grant
Detective/Corp 0.67
Child Sex Prod Grant
Deputy 1
Admin
Sheriff 1
Total County/Other 10.33
Category 1
Dedicated FTEs
Note:"Unincorporated"here includeS Small cities.
Unincorp
Valley
Medical Lk
Deer Park
Total
Admin
Chief/inspector
_ __
1
1
Sergeant
_
1
1
Lieutenant
0.25
0.75
1
Patrol
_
_
Captain
1
1
Lieutenant
,
2
4
Sergeant
6
13
Detective/Corp.
4
3
10
Deputies
_
52
.-
5
2
103
Traffic/CVEO
Sergeant
-
1
1
Detective/Corp.
2
1
3
Deputies
7
5 •
12
Property Crimes
Sergeant
_ ._
1
1
Detective/Corp.
3
a
9
Community Services
Deputy
1
1
2
Domestic Violence
Detective/Corp.
1
1
Deputy
1
_
1
SRO
Deputies
3
4
1
6
Total Dedicated FTEs
83.25
80.75
5
3
172
Dedicated FTEs excluding SROs
80.25
76.75
5
2
164
2010
Category 2
Shared Services
Investigative!
Community Services/K-9
Major Crimes
Captain
Lieutenant
Sergeant
Detectives
Sex Crimes
Sergeant
Detectives
Property Crimes TF
Sergeant
Detectives
Deputies
1
5.i
4
ISUICIUIDECIJTTF/Meth%IDTF% _
Lieutenant 1.30
Sergeant 1.00
Detectives 6.83
Deputies 2.25
Gang Enforcement
Sergeant
Detective/Corp
Deputies
Total Investigative
Intellelligence Led Policing
Deputies
1.00
2.00
37.92
Marine/Search Rescue
Deputies 1.75
K-9
Deputies
I r otar investigative/Support Sery 45.67
City 2010 Final CCM 06-30-10 Comm Officer Worksheet
Category 3
Allocated with
Administrative Costs
Command Staff
Undersheriffs
PIO
Sergeant
Training/OPS
Lieutenant
Sergeant
Deputies
2
2
1
2
Total Administrative 8
Category 4
County Responsibility!
Other Cost Recovery Method
Civil
Lieutenant
Deputies
Marine Patrol
Deputy
DEA
Detective/Corp
DTF
Detective/Corp
Deputies
0.25
1.50
0.75
Sex Off.Res.Verif.
Detective/Corp 0.15
Sex Off.Res.Verif.SA03
Detective/Corp 1.00
WA Meth Grant
Detective/Corp 0.67
Child Sex Prod Grant
Deputy 1
Admin
Sheriff 1
Total County/Other 10.33
Sheriffs Office-2214
Commissioned Officer Worksheet
Total Commissioned FTE: 227.00
Total included in Commissioned Officer Charge: 208.19
Excludes those allocated along with administrative costs and those that are County responsibility.
Category 1
Dedicated FTEs
Note:"Unincorporated"here includes small cities.
Unincorp Valley Medical Lk
Deer Park
Total
Admin
Chief/Inspector
1
1
Sergeant
1
_
_
1
Lieutenant -
1
Patrol —
Captain 1
-
1
Lieutenant 2
2
4
_
Sergeant 8
6
14
Detective/Corp. - 6
6
Deputies 55 44 5
2
106
Traffic/CVEO
Sergeant -
t
1
Detective/Corp.
1
3
Deputies 4
5
9
Property Crimes
Sergeant -
-
1
1
Detective/Corp. 3
6
9
Community Services
Deputy 1
1
2
Domestic Violence
Detective/Corp. 1
1
Deputy 1
1
SRO
Deputies 3
1
8
Total Dedicated 1-I is 80 81 5
3
169
Dedicated FTEs excluding SROs 77 77 5
2
161
City CCM 2011 12-28
2011
Category 2
Shared Services
Investigative/
Community Services/K-9
Major Crimes
Captain 1
Lieutenant 1
Sergeant 1
Detectives 6
Sex Crimes
Sergeant
Detectives
Investigative Task Force
Lieutenant
Sergeant
Detectives
CIUIDECIJTTF(Meth%/DTF
Lieutenant
Sergeant
Detectives
Deputies
4.84
0
7
0.83
0.52
Gang Enforcement _
Sergeant _ 1.00
Detective/Corp 2.00
Deputies 1.00
Total Investigative 31.44
Intellelligence Led Policing
Deputies
Marine/Search Rescue
Deputies 1.75
K-9
Deputies
5
Total Investigative/Support Sery 39.19
Comm Officer Worksheet
Category 3
Allocated with
Administrative Costs
Command Staff
U ndersheriffs
PIO
Sergeant
Training/OPS
Lieutenant
Sergeant
Deputies
1
Total Administrative 8
Category 4
County Responsibility!
Other Cost Recovery Method
Civil
Lieutenant
Deputies
Marine Patrol
Deputy
DEA
Detective/Corp
DTF
Detective/Corp
Deputies
3
Sex Offender Registration
1
1.50
0.75
Detective/Corp 0.16
Sex Off.Res.Verif.SA03 _
Detective/Corp : 1"7
ISU Federal Seizures
Detective/Con) 1.42
Child Sex Pred Grant
Deputy 0.73
Admin
Sheriff
1
Total County/Other 10.81
6. Financial Matters-Ken Thompson, Mike Jackson
a. Explanation of City Funds
b. Reserves
c. General Fund Ending Fund Balance
d. Long-term thinking
e. Set aside for capital projects when General Fund ending fund balance
exceeds$26 million (40% for capital)
f. Financial Objectives
+Maintain a General Fund ending balance of at least 15%
+Maintain the Service Level Stabilization Fund at$5.4 million
City of Spokane Valley Funds:
Expected
Fund Balance
Fund: 12-31-10
001 General Fund 25,840,000
101 Street Fund 2,585,000
103 Trails & Paths Fund 40,000
105 Hotel/Motel Fund 200,000
120 CenterPlace Operating Reserve Fund 350,000
'121 Service Level Stabilization Reserve Fund 5,421 ,000
122 Winter Weather Reserve Fund 500,000
123 Civic Facilities Replacement Fund 1 ,600,000
204 Debt Service LTGO 0
301 Capital Projects Fund 1 ,457,000
302 Special Capital Projects Fund 1 ,500,000
303 Street Capital Projects Fund. 0
307 Capital Grants Fund 0
309 Parks Capital Projects Fund 1 ,000,000
310 Civic Buildings Capital Projects Fund 4,300,000
402 Stormwater Management Fund 2,200,000
501 Equipment Rental & Replacement Fund 900,000
502 Risk Management 20,000
City of Spokane Valley
General Fund Projection
1-21-11
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Estimate Estimate Estimate Estimate Estimate
General Fund Revenues:
Sales Tax 9 15,900,000 $ 15,900,000 $ 16,000,000 $ 16,200,000 $ 16,200,000
Property Tax $ 10,875,000 $ 10,900,000 $ 10,950,000 $ 11,000,000 $ 11,100,000
Gambling Tax $ 325,000 9 325,000 $ 325,000 S 325,000 8 325,000
Franchise Fees/Bus. Reg. $ 1,100,000 $ 1,100,000 $ 1,140,000 $ 1,180,000 $ 1,200,000
State Shared Revenues $ 2,000,000 $ 2,101,250 $ 2,207,626 $ 2,262,817 $ 2,280,000
Service Fees $ 1,500,000 $ 1,600,000 $ 1,600,000 $ 1,600,000 $ 1,600,000
Fines&Forfeitures $ 1,880,000 $ 1,800,000 $ 1,800,000 S 1,800,000 $ 1,800,000
Recreation Program Fees $ 555,500 $ 560,000 S 565,000 $ 570,650 $ 570,000
Interfund Transfers $ 2,040,000 $ 55,000 $ 55,000 $ 55,000 $ 55,000
Investment Int.&Misc. $ 200,000 $ 180,000 $ 150,000 S 150,000 5 75,000
Carryover from prior yr $ 25,800,000 $ 25,840,413 5 24,610,133 $ 21,597,996 16,836,962
Total General Fund $ 62,175,500 $ 60,361,663 $ 59,402,759 $ 56,741,463 $ 52,041,962
General Fund Expenditures:
Legislative $ 324,298 $ 340,513 $ 357,539 $ 394,186 $ 413,896
Executive&Legislative $ 1,055,906 $ 1,108,701 $ 1,222,343 $ 1,347,633 $ 1,415,015
Public Safety $ 22,179,880 $ 23,000,000 5 23,800,000 $ 24,600,000 $ 25,400,000
Deputy City Manager $ 559,942 $ 587,939 $ 648,203 $ 714,644 $ 750,376
Finance $ 1,014,340 $ 1,065,057 $ 1,174,225 $ 1,294,583 $ 1,359,313
Human Resources $ 236,646 $ 248,478 $ 273,947 $ 302,027 $ 317,128
Public Works $ 892,617 $ 937,248 $ 1,033,316 $ 1,139,231 $ 1,196,192
Corn Dev Admin $ 321,049 $ 337,101 $ 371,654 $ 409,749 $ 430,236
Dev. Engineering $ 669,570 $ 703,049 $ 775,111 $ 854,560 $ 897,288
Planning $ 1,023,374 $ 1,074,543 $ 1,184,683 $ 1,306,113 $ 1,371,419
Building $ 1,215,303 $ 1,276,068 $ 1,406,865 $ 1,551,069 S 1,628,622
Parks Admin $ 948,970 $ 996,419 $ 1,098,551 $ 1,211,153 $ 1,271,711
Recreation $ 246,628 $ 258,959 $ 285,503 $ 314,767 $ 330,505
Aquatics $ 429,250 $ 450,713 $ 496,911 $ 547,844 $ 575,236
Senior Center $ 89,653 $ 94,136 $ 103,785 $ 114,422 $ 120,144
CenterPlace $ 1,098,911 $ 1,153,857 $ 1,272,127 $ 1,402,520 $ 1,472,646
Spending less than budget $ (590,000) $ (500,000) $ (500,000) $ (500,000) $ (500,000;
General Government $ 4,618,750 $ 2,618,750 $ 2,800,000 $ 2,900,000 $ 3,000,000
Total General Fund 36,335,087 35,751,530 $ 37,804,763 $ 39,904,501 $ 41,449,726
Net carryover to next year 25,812,413 $ 24,6:0,133 21,597,996 16,836,962 10,592,236
City of Spokane Valley
Street Fund - Multiyear Financial Forecast
1-21-11
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Estimate Estimate Estimate Estimate Estimate
Beginning Fund Bal $ 2,700,000 $ 2,048,000 $ 1,929,000 $ 1,760,000 $ 1,491,000
Interest Income $ 6,000 $ 6,000 $ 6,000 $ 6,000 $ 2,000
Utility tax-telephones $ 2,850,000 $ 2,850,000 $ 2,900,000 $ 2,900,000 $ 2,900,000
Storm Wat. Share facility $ 250,000
Motor fuel tx & misc $ 1,800,000 $ 1,850,000 $ 1,850,000 $ 1,850,000 $ 1,850,000
$ 7,606,000 $ 6,754,000 $ 6,685,000 $ 6,516,000 $ 6,243,000
Expenditures $ 4,500,000 $ 4,600,000 $ 4,700,000 $ 4,800,000 $ 4,900,000
Depreciation on plows, backhoe $ 175,000 $ 175,000 $ 175,000 $ 175,000 $ 175,000
Building $ 500,000
Trucks & Other $ 383,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000
Ending Fund Bal. carried to next year $ 2,048,000 $ 1,929,000 $ 1,760,000 $ 1,491,000 $ 1,118,000
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
GENERAL FUND ENDING FUND BALANCE
AT 12-31-
Endg Fund Bal. Increase
2004 $ 4,793,460
2005 $ 7,047,500 $ 2,254,040
2006 $ 8,706,611 $ 1,659,111
2007 $ 13,747,197 $ 5,040,586
2008 $ 21,692,296 $ 7,945,099
2009 $ 24,597,004 $ 2,904,708
2010 estimate $ 25,840,413 $ 1,243,409 est. +
Financial Management —The City proposes to:
1. Maintain basic service levels with reduced resources
2. Minimize personnel costs/overhead by continuing to contract for many services
3. Continue the 6-year Business Plan process
4. Leverage City funds with grant opportunities
5. Minimize City debt with pay as you go philosophy
• The State of Washington sets the maximum level of allowable debt for cities
based on assessed value of property. The City of Spokane Valley currently
utilizes only 1.63% of its allowable debt capacity—which is extremely low debt.
Financial Objectives - The City's financial objectives through 2014 are:
1. Maintain a minimum general fund ending balance of 15% of revenues through 2014
2. Maintain the Service Level Stabilization Fund at the current level of $5.4 million
through 2014
Commitment — By committing to these objectives, the City will Insure financial sustainability
through 2014 and into the future. The City can achieve this by:
1. Reducing 2010 General Fund Expenditures by 3%
2. Cutting future (beginning in 2011) General Fund expenditures by at least 3%
Challenges — Beyond the General Fund, the City of Spokane Valley has three primary financial
concerns:
1. Funding Street Capital projects
2. Funding the Street Preservation Plan to maintain City streets
3. Funding Parks Capital projects
As noted in the Multiyear Financial Forecast included in this budget, the City is relying on
ending fund balance/reserves to offset the projected decline in revenues through 2014. During
each budget cycle, the City will review the reserve balance and determine if additional budget
cuts will be more judicious than subsidizing the general fund through reserves.
(Excerpt from dm City 1vMtnager's Annual Budget Message-20 I 1)
THE crr OF
SPOKAN VAL,_,
COMPREFIENSIV
PLAN
:pokane Cl� - ---
;OValley
"A community of opportunity where
individuals and families can grtw and
play and businesses will flourish and
prosper. " City of Spokane Valley Vision Statement
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
GOALS AND POLICIES ONLY— No Supporting Text
1. Introduction Goals and Policies
Goals G-1 Create a government that places a premium on providing effective
customer service.
Policies
IP-1 The City should periodically evaluate programs, procedures, processes and other
opportunities of reaching the customer service goal.
2. Land Use Goals and Policies
Residential Goals & Policies
Goal LUG-9 Preserve and protect the character of Spokane Valley's residential
neighborhoods.
Policies
LUP-1,1 Maintain and protect the character of existing and future residential
neighborhoods through the development and enforcement of the City's land use
regulations and joint planning.
LUP-1.2 Protect residential areas from impacts of adjacent non-residential uses and/or
higher Intensity uses through the development and enforcement of the City's land
use regulations and joint planning.
LUP-1.3 Review and revise as necessary, existing land use regulations to provide for
innovation and flexibility in the design of new residential developments,
accessory dwelling units and in-fill development.
LUP-1.4 Encourage the development of transportation routes and facilities to serve
residential neighborhoods. Special attention should be given to pedestrian
circulation.
LUP-1.5 Encourage the development of parks and the dedication of open space in and
adjacent to residential areas. Open space dedication shall be proportionate to
the size of the development.
LUP-1.6 Preserve site characteristics that enhance residential development (trees, bodies
of water, vistas, and similar features) using site planning techniques such as
clustering, planned unit developments, transfer of development rights and lot size
averaging.
LUP-1.7 Allow zone changes within the Low Density Residential category only when
specific criteria are met. Criteria may include:
• Substantial changes within zone change area.
• Clear mapping errors.
• Adequate facilities and services (e.g. sewer, water capacity).
• Consistency with densities in the vicinity of the zone change.
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Goals and Policies Only
Page 1 of 26
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
l LUP-4.5 Ensure compatibility between mixed-use developments and residential areas by
regulating height, scale, setbacks, and buffers.
LUP-4.6 Develop community design guidelines to promote common open space, public
art, and plazas in commercial and office developments.
LUP-4.7 Develop design guidelines that encourage quality design and pedestrian and
vehicle circulation in commercial, office and Mixed-use developments.
LUP-4.8 Develop design guidelines to encourage commercial development to locate along
the street edge (where deemed appropriate) to provide pedestrian street access.
LUP-4.9 Identify and designate streets where on-street parking can be safely provided
without unduly slowing traffic flow or jeopardizing traffic safety.
LUP-4.10 May provide Incentives to encourage developers to include housing in mixed-use
projects.
Goal LUG-5 Identify appropriate locations for the Auto Row Overlay designation.
Policies
LUP-5.1 Identify other appropriate automobile related uses within the Auto Row Overlay
designation that are complementary to automobile dealerships.
LUP-5.2 Develop appropriate development standards for permitted uses within the Auto
Row Overlay designated area.
City Center
Goal LUG-6 Create an identifiable City Center that serves as the social, cultural,
and economic focus of the City of Spokane Valley.
Policies
L,UP-6.1 Define a City Center with distinct boundaries, unique building types, and special
features.
LUP-6.2 Strengthen existing connections of the City Center area to the region's high
capacity transit system.
LUP-6.3 Focus on improving the existing character and image of the City Center area
through appropriate development regulations and design standards.
LUP-6.4 Develop land use regulations that allow higher intensity development in the City
Center including, but not limited to, taller buildings, increased floor area ratios
(FAR) and permitted uses.
LUP-6.5 Coordinate with urban service providers to ensure sufficient capacity is available
for anticipated development.
LUP-6.6 Allow for a variety of uses and mixed-use development within buildings or
complexes. Ensure that mixed-use development complements and enhances
the character of the surrounding residential and commercial area.
LUP-6.7 The City should always consider City Center sites regarding potential civic and
cultural uses the City develops, such as a City Hall.
LUP-6.8 Provide incentives to attract cultural and civic uses to the City Center over which
the City does not have direct control,such as libraries or recreation facilities.
LUP-6.9 Develop land use regulations that encourage higher density residential uses on
the periphery of the City Center area in close proximity to high capacity transit.
High density housing should be accompanied by residentially oriented retail and
service uses.
{
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Goals and Policies Only
Page 3 of 25
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
LUP-9.2 The mix of land uses allowed in either the Corridor Mixed-use or Mixed-use
Center designation should include:
• A variety of housing types including apartments, condominiums, town
houses, two-family and single family dwellings on small lots;
• A full range of retail goods and services including grocery stores,
theaters/entertainment, restaurants, personal services and specialty shops;
• Public/quasi-public uses and/or open space;
• Professional Office and other employment oriented uses; and
• Commercial uses that require large land areas but have low employment
density and are auto-dependant, such as lumber yards, plant nurseries,
warehouses, and auto dealerships, should be prohibited from either Mixed-
use category.
Industrial Goals & Policies
Goal LUG-10 Provide for the development of well-planned industrial areas and
ensure the long-term holding of appropriate land in parcel sizes
adequate to allow for future development as industrial uses.
Policies
LUP-10.1 Plan capital facility expenditures to assist the development of lands designated
for industrial uses.
LUP-10.2 Encourage a diverse array of industries to locate in Spokane Valley.
LUP-10.3 Encourage shared-use parking, pedestrian access and transit incentive programs
in industrial development projects.
Goal LUG-11 A variety of strategically located heavy industrial areas should be
designated and protected from conflicting land uses.
Policies
LUP-11.1 Commercial, residential and recreational uses should be limited or not allowed in
areas designated for industry, except for small-scale ancillary commercial and
recreational uses intended to primarily serve the industrial area.
LUP-11.2 Conversion of designated industrial lands to other uses should be strictly limited
to ensure an adequate land supply.
LUP-11.3 Provide appropriate buffering, landscaping and other development standards for
industrial areas.
LUP-11.4 Retail outlets shall be allowed for industrial businesses that manufacture and/or
assemble products on-site.
Goal LUG-12 Designate and protect a variety of strategically located light industry
areas.
Policies
LUP-12.1 Commercial, residential and recreational uses shall be limited or not allowed in
areas designated for light industry except for small-scale ancillary commercial
and recreational uses primarily to serve the industrial area.
LUP-12.2 Light Industry areas shall include lighting, sidewalks, bike lanes and landscaping
to provide a safe and attractive working environment.
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Goals and Policies Only
Page 5 of 25
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
( Historic and Cultural Resources Goals & Policies
Goal LUG-16 identify and protect archeological and historic sites and structures.
Policies
LUP-15.1 Continually identify and evaluate archaeological and historic sites to determine
which should be preserved.
LUP-15.2 Link cultural resource preservation with local economic development strategies.
LUP-15.3 Establish and maintain relations with Native American tribes for the preservation
of archaeological sites and traditional cultural properties.
Land Use/Transportation Connection Goals & Policies
Goal LUG-16 Provide a street system that connects neighborhoods,
Policies
LUP-16.1 Encourage new developments, Including multifamily projects, to be arranged in a
pattern of connecting streets and blocks to allow people to get around easily by
foot, bicycle, bus or car.
LUP-16.2 Develop street, pedestrian path and bike path standards that contribute to a
system of fully connected routes.
LUP-16.3 Require adequate emergency evacuation routes prior to approving new
development or redevelopment.
Joint Planning Goals and Policies
Goal LUG-17 The City of Spokane Valley should continue to coordinate with
Spokane County and neighboring cities for adjacent urban growth
areas.
Policies
LUP-17.1 The City should coordinate with Spokane County to ensure appropriate service
provision and land development prior to City annexation. Methods to allow for
coordination may Include, but are not limited to, execution of an interiocal
agreement between the City of Spokane Valley and Spokane County to:
• Establish guidelines for development plan review, impact fees and SEPA
mitigation; and
• Define service delivery responsibilities, level of service standards and capital
facility implementation consistent with the goals and policies of this Plan.
LUP-17.2 Through regional planning efforts, the City and County should ensure that
planning is compatible with the Cities of Spokane and Liberty Lake.
LUP-1.7.3 The City should continue coordinated planning efforts between Spokane County,
appropriate fire districts, school districts and water service providers to assure
managed growth in urban growth areas.
Potential Annexation Area Goals and Policies
Goal LUG-18 Identify Potential Annexation Areas for the City of Spokane Valley
that are consistent with the Spokane County regional urban growth
area boundary.
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Goals and Policies Only
Page 7of25
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
TP-4.1 Restrict high-speed traffic from residential neighborhoods and utilize traffic
calming strategies to reduce vehicular speeds where appropriate.
TP-4.2 Complete local traffic circulation plans for areas experiencing new development.
Transportation System Management (TSM) Goals & Policies
Goal TG-5 Extend the functional life of the existing transportation system and
increase its safe and efficient operation through the application of
TSM strategies.
Policies
TP-5.1 Implement traffic signal synchronization projects as the primary component of a
TSM program. As funding permits, monitoring of traffic operation should be
carried out to assure efficient timing of traffic signals.
TP-5.2 Use Access Management measures, such as placing restrictions on left turns
across major arterial streets to reduce accident rates and extend capacity of
major arterials.
Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Goals & Policies
Goal TG-6 Encourage all Commute Trip Reduction affected and voluntary
employers In Spokane Valley to achieve the CTR Act travel
reduction goals.
Policies
TP-6.1 Encourage car- and van-pooling, telecommuting, flexible work schedules and
other strategies identified in the CTR to reduce overall travel demand.
Freight& Goods Goals & Policies
Goal TG.7 Provide for safe and efficient freight mobility.
Policies
TP-7.1 Discourage development of low-density residential development In close
proximity to designated freight corridors and intermodal freight facilities.
TP-7.2 Designate appropriate truck routes in the City of Spokane Valley.
TP-7.3 Design designated freight corridors to improve traffic flow and freight mobility.
Goal TG-E1 Adapt street and roadway design and facilities to manage traffic
demand, address the need for freight movement, resolve traffic
conflicts, and complement land use and urban features.
Policies
TP-8.1 Use the city's transportation system and infrastructure to support desired land
uses and development patterns.
TP-8.2 Allow for variety of services within neighborhoods that are convenient to and
meet the needs of neighborhood residents, decreasing the need for driving.
Non-Motorized Transportation Goals & Policies
Goal TG-9 Enhance community livability and transportation by encouraging a
connected system of pedestrian and bicycle ways that is integrated
into a coordinated regional network.
Policies
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Goals and Policies Only
Page 9 of 25
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
TP-12.1 Encourage the full development and utilization of airport properties at Felts Field.
TP-12.2 Encourage commercial, educational and logistical support industry in close
proximity to the airport.
Goal TG-13 Encourage land use and development compatible with airport uses
and regulated airspace.
Policies
TP-13.1 Enforce regulations protecting airspace from encroachment.
TP-13.2 Discourage incompatible land uses and residential densities adjacent to the
airport.
Rail Goals & Policies
Goal TG-14 Support and encourage the continued viability of the passenger and
freight rail system in the region.
Policies
TP-14.1 Participate with other jurisdictions to facilitate safe and efficient rail systems.
TP-14.2 Support the "Bridging the Valley" project to reduce the number of at-grade
railroad crossings in the City of Spokane Valley and to reduce the adverse noise
impact on adjacent properties of railroad operations.
TP-14.3 Discourage incompatible land uses and residential densities along rail corridors.
Pipeline Goals & Policies
Goal TG-15 Cooperate with pipeline operators to maintain safe operating
conditions at intermodal facilities and along pipeline easements.
Policies
TP-15.1 Establish guidelines for the development/redevelopment of properties adjacent to
pipeline corridors.
TP-15.2 Develop regulations governing the use, handling and transportation of pipeline
products.
TP-15.3 Evaluate the need for designation of hazardous cargo routes associated with
pipeline products as well as other hazardous materials.
TP-15.4 Include provisions in the Hazard Mitigation Plan for mitigation of and response to
product leakage, spillage and explosion.
Intermodal/Multi-modal Goals & Policies
Goal TG-16 Encourage improved intermodal connections to facilitate freight
movements in and between strategic commercial and industrial
• locations, and to provide mode choice for citizens and businesses.
Policies
TP-16.1 Remove obstructions and conflicts between roadway corridors and
bicycle/pedestrian/transit modes.
TP-16.2 Encourage freight intensive operations to locate along designated truck routes
and intermodal terminals.
TP-16.3 Evaluate the need for public improvements, incentives and regulation to increase
intermodal fluidity.
Adopted April 25, 2006(Updated 7-31-2008) Goals and Policies Only
Page 11 of 26
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
CFP-2.2 Update the City's Capital Facilities Plan annually to ensure that services and
facilities are provided efficiently and effectively and to help establish budget
priorities.
CFP-2.3 Planned expenditures for capital improvements shall not exceed estimated
revenues.
CFP-2.4 If adopted level of service standards cannot be maintained, the City shall
increase funding, reduce level of service standards or reassess the Land Use
Element.
Public Safety - Fire and Police
Goal CFG-3 Provide police protection efficiently and cost effectively to Spokane
Valley residents. Coordinate with fire districts to ensure adequate
fire protection and emergency services for Spokane Valley citizens,
Policies
CFP-3.1 Encourage Inter-jurisdictional cooperation among law enforcement agencies and
fire districts to further develop, where practical, shared service and facility use.
CFP-3.2 Develop a comprehensive emergency management plan that meets the needs of
the City and coordinates with regional emergency planning efforts.
CFP-3.3 Require adequate emergency vehicle road access and water supply/pressure for
new development within the City.
CFP-3.4 Encourage property owners to create a defensible space between structures and
adjacent fuels and require that fire rated roofing materials are used on buildings
in forested areas.
Water and Sewer
Goal CFG-4 Plans for water and sewer service should be consistent with the
SVCP.
Policies
CFP-4.1 Review water and sewer plans to determine consistency with anticipated
population growth, future land uses, comprehensive plan land use policies and
development regulations.
CFP-4.2 Coordinate sewer planning with appropriate jurisdictions for consistency with the
SVCP.
CFP-4.3 Support continued planning for domestic water needs in partnership with water
purveyors, the Joint Aquifer Board, Washington State Department of Health and
the Washington State Department of Ecology.
CFP-4.4 Encourage public and private efforts to conserve water.
CFP-4.5 Discourage new, private domestic wells within the Spokane Valley City limits.
CFP-4.6 New development must connect to public sewer and water.
Solid Waste
Goal CFG-5 Promote the reduction, re-use and recycling of solid waste,
Policies
CFP-5.1 Establish a City Hall recycling program to present a positive example of civic and
environmental responsibility.
t
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Goals and Policies Only
Page 13 of 25
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
( CFP-9.1 Implement a concurrency management system for transportation, water and
sewer facilities.
Financing Growth
Goal CFG-10 Consider a variety of revenue sources and funding mechanisms
including, but not limited to, impact fees.
Policies
CFP-10.1 Identify and pursue sources of revenue for financing public facilities.
Essential Public Facilities
Goal CFG-11 Collaborate with all Spokane County jurisdictions in determining the
best locations for public and private essential public facilities.
Policies
CFP-11.1 Follow the process for siting essential public facilities as set forth in the Spokane
County Regional Siting Process for Essential Public Facilities.
5, Housing Goals and Policies
Goal HG-1 Encourage diversity in design to meet the housing needs of the
residents of the community and region.
Policies
HP-1.1 Consider the economic impact of development regulations on the cost of
housing.
HP-1.2 Streamline the development review process and strive to eliminate unnecessary
time delays and expenses.
HP-1.3 Establish development regulations and incentives for greater diversity of housing
types, costs and designs, that may include bonus incentives, clustering, and
transfer of development rights.
HP-1.4 Encourage mixed-use residential/commercial development in designated areas
throughout the City with the use of developer incentives and design standards.
HP-1.5 Encourage the development of three- and four-bedroom rental units along transit
corridors and within walking distance of schools and recreational facilities.
HP-1.6 Encourage the development of housing for seniors and other special populations
along transit corridors and within walking distance of shopping and medical
facilities.
Goal HG-2 Encourage the use of affordable housing Initiatives of regional
organizations with a record of providing safe and affordable
housing.
Policies
HP-2.1 Encourage appropriate sitting of public housing programs.
HP-2.2 Target appropriate resources in low income areas Identified by the U.S. Census
Bureau.
HP-2.3 Encourage homeownership initiatives which could Include housing cooperatives
and lease-purchase ownership.
HP-2.4 Encourage the activities of affordable housing providers where appropriate.
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Goals and Policies Only
Page 15 of 25
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
( PUP-3.6 Based upon applicable regulations, the City should work with utilities and
appropriate entities in preparing a plan for under grounding utilities in areas
where their visual impact is critical to improving the appearance of the City, such
as the City Center, Sprague Avenue and identified aesthetic corridors.
PUP-3.7 The City should work with appropriate entities to prepare right-of-way vegetation
plans to ensure that the needs of landscaping and screening are balanced with
the need to prevent negative impacts to utilities.
PUP-3.8 Require the placement of cellular facilities, substations and antennas in a manner
that minimizes adverse impacts on adjacent land uses and utilizes existing
structures where feasible.
PUP-3.9 Coordinate with utility providers to ensure that sizing, locating and phasing of
utility systems are consistent with the SVCP.
PUP-3.10 The City and utilities should be encouraged to develop an integrated Geographic
Information System (GIS)to better serve mutual needs and those of the public.
PUP-3.11 The City should adhere to the Policies and Actions identified in the current
Regional Utility Corridor Plan.
7. Economic Development Goals and Policies
Goal EDG-1 Encourage diverse and mutually supportive business development
and the expansion and retention of existing businesses within the
City for the purpose of emphasizing economic vitality, stability and
sustalnability.
Policies
EDP-1.1 Strive to provide the necessary public facilities, infrastructure and services to
support economic development.
EDP-1.2 In conjunction with appropriate entities, encourage market feasibility studies to
identify and target economic opportunities.
EDP-1.3 In partnership with the business community and appropriate entities, encourage
the development of a comprehensive marketing strategy customized for Spokane
Valley and supportive of regional economic development objectives.
EDP-1.4 Consider establishment of a public Interactive web-based geographic information
system to facilitate economic research for businesses.
EDP-1.5 Encourage the development of business incubators to promote the creation of
new business enterprises.
EDP-1.6 Encourage creation and retention of home-based businesses that are consistent
with neighborhood character.
EDP-1.7 Encourage State and Federal agencies to locate in the City of Spokane Valley.
EDP-1.8 Encourage local organizations engaged in business retention, expansion and
recruitment.
EDP-1.9 Encourage public and private programs and activities that diversify the economy
and labor force.
EDP-1.10 Encourage the full utilization and expansion of the Foreign Trade Zone.
EDP-1,11 Seek expansion of the Spokane Community Empowerment Zone to include
Income-eligible Census block groups within the City of Spokane Valley.
f
Adopted April 25,2006(Updated 7-31-2008) Goals and Policies Only
Page 17 of 25
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
EDP-5.2 Develop and Implement strategies to identify and use appropriate Federal, State
and regional economic resources and incentives.
EDP-5.3 Encourage the continued support and funding of active duty, reserves and
National Guard components of the United States Armed Forces.
EDP-5.4 Collaborate with other local governments and business organizations in
promoting legislation In support of economic development when appropriate.
Goal EDG-6 Establish a balanced approach to environmental sustainability
which complements the utilization of area resources and economic
growth.
Policies
EDP-6.1 Encourage the retention, development and recruitment of environmentally
friendly businesses.
EDP-6.2 Encourage programs that foster and promote sustainable business practices.
Goal EDG-7 Maintain a regulatory environment that offers flexibility,
consistency, predictability and clear direction.
EDP-7.1 Evaluate, monitor and improve development standards to promote compatibility
between adjacent land uses; and update permitting processes to ensure that
they are equitable, cost-effective, and expeditious.
EDP-7.2 Review development regulations periodically to ensure clarity, consistency and
predictability.
8. Natural Environment Goals and Policies
Overall Critical Areas Goals
Goal NEG-1 Encourage management of critical areas in such a way that includes
education, rehabilitation, preservation, protection, enhancement,
mitigation and incentives for protection.
Goal NEG-2 Review and update the Critical Areas' goals, policies and
regulations every five years.
Goal NEG-3 Actively seek individuals or local groups to assist in identifying and
protecting critical areas.
Goal NEG-4 Regulations developed by Spokane Valley will not result in or
constitute a taking of private property and shall be evaluated as
provided for in the Growth Management Act (RCW 36.70A.370).
Regulations to protect the natural environment shall contain
variance provisions including criteria for granting variances, and •
recognize legal nonconforming rights for existing land uses and
activities.
Goal NEG-5 Consider multiple uses of open space and wildlife corridors such as
utility corridors or open space when conflicts do not exist or can be
mitigated.
Goal NEG-6 Best available science (BAS) will be used in the designation and
protection of critical areas.
Wetlands
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Goals and Policies Only
Page 19 of 25
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
{ NEP-12.4 Foster the protection of wildlife corridors in publicly owned open space where
appropriate. These areas should use native plants that support native species of
birds and animals where appropriate.
NEP-12.5 Encourage Informational and educational programs and activities dealing with the
protection of wildlife.
NEP-12.6 Land use regulations and decisions will consider density transfers, bonus
density, nature area preservation or other innovative mechanisms to retain fish
and wildlife habitat areas.
NEP-12.7 Development proposals and their design shall consider the retention and
maintenance of critical fish and wildlife habitat areas and will provide buffers to
protect corridors and water habitats.
NEP-12.8 Coordinate with Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife in planning
and management of fish and wildlife habitat.resources.
Flood Areas
Goal NEG-13 Work to identify watershed characteristics that affect frequently
flooded areas.
Goal NEG-14 Assist in the management of frequently flooded areas to enhance
environmental quality and to minimize the risks to life and property.
Policies
NEP-14.1 Frequently flooded areas and marshes should be used as forest, wildlife habitat,
open space, recreation and other appropriate uses whenever practical.
NEP-14.2 Require the maintenance, protection or restoration of natural drainage systems.
NEP-14.3 Use bioengineering techniques, where appropriate, rather than hard engineering
structures to stabilize the floodway.
NEP-14.4 Development should not occur on lands identified as being within a 100-year
floodplain or as having a history of flooding without mitigation.
Geologically Hazardous Areas
Goal NEG-15 Development should be discouraged in geologically hazardous
areas unless it can be demonstrated that a hazard area can be
developed consistent with public health and safety. Development
permits should be conditioned to mitigate certain hazards.
Goal NEG-16 Geologically hazardous areas may be used as open space for
recreation, forest, wildlife habitat and other uses as appropriate.
Policies
NEP-16.1 Limit clearing and grading activities in geologically hazardous areas.
NEP-16.2 Development proposals within geologically hazardous areas should include an
erosion control plan and/or stabilization plan prior to receiving approval.
NEP-16.3 Land use regulations and decisions should consider density transfers, bonus
density, nature belt preservation or other innovative mechanisms to retain
geologically hazardous areas in a natural state whenever appropriate.
Surface Water
Goal NEG-17 Encourage the continued provision of both adequate quantity and
quality of surface water for Spokane Valley.
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Goals and Policies Only
Page 21 of 25
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
Goal PRG-2 Based upon budgetary resources, plan, acquire, develop, and
maintain within Spokane Valley, a system of parks that provides a
broad range of recreational opportunities and access to natural
resources.
Policies
PRP-2.1 Work to develop a system of park facilities that meets applicable standards.
PRP-2.2 Develop a plan for each park facility before committing to any major use of the
site.
PRP-2.3 Establish and implement management practices for resource protection (wildlife,
fisheries, habitat), quality recreational experience, public safety and cost
efficiency.
PRP-2.4 Encourage innovative strategies and incentives (e.g., adopt-a-park, adopt-a-trail,
adopt-a-space) to enhance ex isting programs for park maintenance, safety and
accessibility.
PRP-2.5 Parks should be designed and located to provide ease of access for
pedestrians, bicycles, autos and public transit.
Goal PRG-3 Based Upon available budgetary resources plan, acquire, develop,
and maintain facilities that meet identified needs and are otherwise
unavailable to the community.
Policies
PRP-3.1 Collaborate with other cities, school districts, and sports organizations in the
region to develop a system of sports fields, sports field complexes and aquatic
( facilities to serve the needs of Spokane Valley residents.
PRP-3.2 Periodically assess recreational facilities In Spokane Valley.
PRP-3.3 Seek grants, private land donations, and other funding sources for land
acquisition and recreational facilities development.
Goal PRG-4 Based upon budgetary resources, promote, develop, operate, and
maintain a comprehensive trail/bicycle system within Spokane
Valley that provides non-motorized travel, (walking, bicycling,
skating, and horseback riding) to meet city residents recreation,
fitness, and commuting needs.
Policies
PRP-4.1 Strive to develop a network of trails and bikeways within Spokane Valley that will
interconnect population centers, community facilities, work places,
neighborhoods, recreational opportunities, and natural green spaces.
PRP -4.2 Promote appropriate planning and design solutions to avoid adverse
environmental impacts on sensitive areas.
PRP-4.3 Work with individuals, businesses, private developers, public agencies and other
entities to incorporate trails and bikeways, where feasible.
PRP-4.4 Where practical, link open space lands into an Interconnected system.
Goal PRG-5 Identify, evaluate, and preserve as open space selected
undeveloped lands within Spokane Valley.
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Goals and Policies Only
Page 23 of 25
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
clustering, planned unit developments, transfer of development rights, and lot
size averaging.
NP-2.5 Allow zone changes within the Low Density Residential category only when
specific criteria are met. Criteria may include:
• Substantial changes within zone change area.
• Clear mapping errors.
• Adequate facilities and services (e.g. sewer, water capacity).
• Consistency with densities in the vicinity of the zone change.
NP-2.6 Establish appropriate design guidelines with buffer zones and transition
requirements to protect residential neighborhoods from incompatible land uses
and adverse impacts associated with arterials, freeways and rail corridors.
NP-2.7 Encourage rehabilitation and improvement programs to conserve and upgrade
existing properties and buildings.
NP-2.8 Encourage programs targeted at neighborhood preservation, including Weed and
Seed, housing rehabilitation and crime prevention programs, such as
Neighborhood Watch, McGruff Houses, etc.
NP-2.9 integrate retail developments Into surrounding neighborhoods through attention
to quality design and function. Encourage neighborhood retail and personal
services to locate at appropriate sites where local economic demand and design
solutions demonstrate compatibility with the neighborhood.
NP-2.10 Develop guidelines and options for Neighborhood/sub-area associations which
facilitate the refinement of Neighborhood/sub-area plans.
Goal NG-3 Encourage Neighborhood/sub-area planning for commercial,
industrial and mixed use properties to enhance the quality, vibrancy
and character of existing development.
Policies
NP-3.1 Establish regulations and identify potential incentives that encourage multi-use
areas that integrate a broad range of appropriate and compatible land use
activities, and encourage the development and redevelopment of land in
conformance with the SVCP.
NP-3.2 Encourage the remediation of environmentally contaminated sites to return the
land to productive commercial and industrial use.
NP-3.3 Encourage commercial development that is designed and scaled in a manner
that is compatible with surrounding neighborhoods.
Goal NG-4 Work with Neighborhoods/sub-areas to determine the need, if any,
and the preferred approach for outreach activities in order to
maintain the flow of information between the city and its citizens.
Policies
NP-4.1 Work with schools and non-profit organizations to Identify and address housing
and neighborhood concerns,
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Goals and Policies Only
Page 25 of 25
. City of Spokane Valley
Park and
gecreationPlan t.. _,
:. .: ....a4a,
S
r
* i.1 L
i
ilitiralk—-- . - r 1:4..,' ";,
APRIL 2006
:f.
1..k.4 y;
'ite. I• '•' `.1.- • 4 '.?" •l N
1i'ti _� i - a r i
a �I S zhmili h -
hire-Ina. i
�f_ i di.3 SW 2nd Avu,S r L 200
_ )orb'
For Maid,OR S720d
—_ —- • (5(03)257-1005
inAgo rri4Da aa,cunr
CHAPTER 1
• Chapter 8: Implementation identifies potential funding sources and
financing strategies for priority capital improvements.
U Appendix A: City Park and Recreation Areas provides a summary
description of existing City parks, along with their facilities,
condition, and planned improvements,
• Appendix B: Park and Recreation Facilities Inventory contains a detailed
inventory of park land by provider, private facilities, and sports
fields, tennis courts, gymnasiums, and pools within the Spokane
Valley planning area.
▪ Appendix C: Demand Analysis is a compilation of data from the
Recreation Survey.
O Appendix D: Park Design Considerations presents acquisition
guidelines and design standards for park development
In addition to the above appendices, a series of background
reports called Discussion Papers were prepared.
1 .4 GOALS, POLICIES AND OBJECTIVES
The goals, planning policies, and objectives listed below create a
framework for implementing the Park and Recreation Plan, The goals
are statements about Spokane Valley's desired future. These goals are
supported by policies that guide plan implementation and objectives
that provide realistic, achievable, and measurable steps toward
reaching the goals. Together, the goals, policies, and objectives can
be used to help measure the plan's success.
Goal 1 ; To develop a balanced, diverse, and accessible park and
recreation system that meets the specific needs of the residents of
Spokane Valley.
Policy 1-A: The City of Spokane Valley will endeavor to provide
park land and recreation facilities equitably throughout the city at
conveniently located and easily accessible sites.
Objective 1-A (1): Establish and regularly update a
comprehensive inventory of existing park and recreation
resources.
Objective 1-A (2): Consider-all options, including partnerships
and collaborations, to acquire and develop neighborhood
parks and community parks in unserved or underserved areas,
as identified in the Recreation Needs Assessment.
1-5 Park & Recreation Plan
CHAPTER 1 -.
Objective 1-A (3): Prioritize the acquisition and development of
park and recreation facilities that contribute to community
identify and community pride in Spokane Valley,
Policy 1-B; The City of Spokane Valley will attempt to provide
equitable and diverse recreation opportunities and activities for the
benefit of Spokane Valley residents and visitors to our community.
Objective 1-B (1): In the near term, offer a limited recreation
program that builds public interest and support. In the long
term, offer comprehensive program services to all ages,
abilities, and economic and cultural backgrounds.
Objective 1-B (2): Adapt programming to meet community
needs and desires as identified through community
questionnaires, focus group meetings, and public meeting
processes,
Objective 1-B (3): Periodically and systematically monitor,
evaluate, and revise existing programs and services to ensure
quality programming.
Objective 1-B (4); Identify anticipated service areas
(neighborhood, community, city-wide, regional) for future parks
and recreation programs to equitably serve all users.
Objective 1-B (5): Maximize the use of existing facilities and
programs to support local needs, while encouraging tourism
and regional use.
Goal 2: To maintain and manage the appropriate social, cultural,
physical, and natural resources required to maintain and improve the
quality of life in Spokane Valley.
Policy 2-A: The City of Spokane Valley will strive to design and
maintain parks and recreation amenities and facilities in a safe,
attractive manner, to contribute to the health, safety, and welfare of
the community.
Objective 2-A (1): Adopt and utilize Design Guidelines for site
selection and development in the acquisition and/or
development of parks within each park classification.
Objective 2-A (2): Prioritize the renovation and upgrade of
existing facilities to improve site safety and encourage facility
use.
Park and Recreation Plan 1-6
CHAPTER 1
Policy 3-A: Generally, the City will not duplicate service nor
compete with private organizations in the delivery of park and
recreation services, unless other service providers are not meeting
the unique and specific needs of Spokane Valley residents.
Policy 3-B: The City of Spokane Valley will continue to foster
cooperative development of park and recreation resources and the
provision of services through private and public collaborations.
Objective 3-8 (1): Work closely with the City Manager, City
Council, and other City departments to achieve mutually
beneficial objectives.
Objective 3-B (2): Work in cooperation with governmental
agencies, educational institutions, private and regional
recreation organizations, and citizen interest groups to
maximize the provision of parks and services.
Objective 3-B (3): Pursue partnerships as a key means for
leveraging resources to meet community needs for park land,
sports facilities, and services, while minimizing duplications of
effort.
Goal 4: Spokane Valley will continue efforts to provide an efficient
level of park and recreation services based on current financial
resources and the ability of residents to pay for those services
Policy 4-A: The City of Spokane Valley will strive provide facilities,
programs, and qualified personnel in a fiscally responsible and
cost effective manner.
Objective 4-A (1): Pursue cost sharing and cost recovery
mechanisms where appropriate.
Objective 4-A (2): Weigh the costs and benefits of
Departmental services and facilities to assist in decision-making
regarding programming and facility development.
Objective 4-A (3): Establish equitable fee structures for facilities
and programs to help ensure the long-term maintenance and
operation of facilities while ensuring affordability.
Objective 4-A (4): Establish more revenue-generating programs
to increase program funding and to help fund or subsidize
other programs and services.
Park and Recreation Plan 1-8
Council Budget Goals for 2011
1. Continue monitoring wastewater issues, including governance of wastewater facilities, and
pursuit of the most efficient and economical methods to ensure the continuation of wastewater
discharge licenses.
2. Re-evaluate regulations specified in the Sprague/Appleway Revitalization Plan as adopted
and amended by City Council.
3. Develop a Shoreline Master Program to provide appropriate regulatory protection for waters
of statewide significance as required by state statute.
4. Pursue a legislative capital budget request for state funding for the acquisition of parkland
adjacent to the Park Street Pool.
5. Develop and implement a multi-year winter roads maintenance plan including
availability, costs and effects of private sector vendors performing winter road maintenance for
the City.
6.Explore a range of options for a City Hall
OF
S pokane CITY
Walley
� 11707 E Sprague Ave Suite 106 Spokane Valley WA 99206
509.921,1000♦ Fax: 509,921,1 008 • cityhall®spokaneva l ley,org
2011 Washington State Legislative Agenda
(See Folders)
Winter Snow Operations Plan
Update 2/8/2011
2010 items:
1. Develop an RFP (Request for Proposals) for services similar to the 2009/2010 Poe
Snow Operations Contract.
Status: We received bids for snowplowing with road graders in early November. We
utilized 7 contractors during two full plows of all City streets in November and December.
As a result of the additional staff person and above contracts we have reduced the amount
of the Poe winter contract. We are continuing to analyze options for snow operations.
2. Purchase the Waste Management property.
a. 1.6 Acres
b. Zoning is Corridor Mix Use (CMU)
c. Employee office, break room and storage area 2,405 S.F. Built in 1955 and is in
fair condition.
d. Shop building is 2,447 S.F. Built in 1972 and is in poor condition. This building
will need some repair in the near future.
e. Appraised value on July 9, 2009 was $530,000
f. Cost of the facility would be shared by the Street Fund and Stormwater Fund
Status: We are currently looking at several additional properties.
3. Hire one additional full-time maintenance/construction inspector
Status: Position was filled
4. Purchase one new truck/plow/sander
Status: Truck has been ordered and the chassis had been built and is currently being
shipped to Tacoma for completion.
5. Purchase one new loader/backhoe
Status: Complete
New 2011 items:
1. Hire two additional full-time maintenance/construction inspectors
a. This would allow us to have at least one City employee during all shifts during
extended winter operations.
b. Costs would be covered with existing funding. Employees would be funded from
the following areas:
i. Reduction in contract snow plow operators
ii. Providing street sign maintenance and installation
iii. Providing vactor services
San of
S pokane
Y.
Valle®
11707 E Sprague Ave Suite 906 ♦ Spokane Valley WA 89206
509.921.1000 • Fax: 509.921,1008 • cityhall®spokanevalley.org
Solid Waste — Summit Discussion
E-Gov Services Page 1 of 1
CONTACT E•GOV SUPPORT
Phone;513.541,7361 INeb Site:rnwr.epovllnk.com/eAOVSUpoort ADMINISTRATION CONSOLE
L� Ill 1; imail:egovsupport @ecilnk.com
Navigation You are logged In as Michelle Rasmussen,
Create Action Line Request
CCC Return to E-GoV Request Form Entry List
Snow Plow/ Removal
WARNING!Please do not use this form to report issues of an emergency nature or for conditions
requiring an immediate response,If your Issue is an emergency,please use the telephone and dial
911.
Purpose.This form Is used to communicate with city personnel to request services and report information.
Contact Information:
First Name;'
Last Name:'
Business Name:I
Email:'
Daytime Phone:
—
Fax:L
Street:
City:'
State/Province;'
ZIP/Postal Code: — —
Issue/Problem Location:,
Address: I i Choose street from dropdown... Validate Address
-Or Other Not Listed-
I-
Unit:
Nature of the complaint/suggestion,,. �y
- — —.
0 of 4000 characters
Citizen's preferred communication methods
Email
Copyright 02004-2011.All Rights Reserved.E-GO:Link.
htt111/WWW_e anvlink-rnm/snnkanevallev/admin/action line/acticrn.asn?actionid=14458 1/11/2011
Michelle R. Rasmussen
From: E-Gov Website [noreply @eciink.com]
Sent: Monday, January 24, 2011 8:28 AM
To: Michelle R. Rasmussen
Subject: Submission: Citizen Service Request (General) (re: Mel Williams)
This automated message was sent by the City of Spokane Valley E-Gov web site, Do not reply to this message. Contact Chris
Thompson for inquiries regarding this email.
A City of Spokane Valley Action Line issue was submitted on Monday,January 24, 2011.
Click the following link to view this Action Line Request;
http://www,eqovlink.com/suok:anevalley/admin/action line/action respond.asp?control=333542&e=Y
ACTION LINE REQUEST DETAILS
DATE SUBMITTED: 1/24/2011 11:27:32 AM
TRACKING NUMBER:3335421127
CATEGORY ID: 13894
CATEGORY Title: Citizen Service Request(General)
SUGGESTION/ISSUE: ...
Nature of the request...
There is a very serious problem with a sink hole under the road, a hole the size of a cantalope has opened up thru the asphalt.
When you look in the hole it is very large underneath.This is located in the roadway 27th and S. Pines, SW corner,about 3 ft
from the street drain to the curb side of the road. I am very concerned as this can cave in at any time. In my mind this is a very
unsafe, would be a very serious emergency.
ACTION LINE REQUESTER CONTACT INFORMATION
NAME: Mel Williams
BUSINESS:
EMAIL: I ein41 53yn ha o.co m
PHONE:
FAX:
ADDRESS:
Copyright 2004-2011.Electronic Commerce Link,Inc.dba EC Link.
1
WORK ORDER FORM
CITIZEN SERVICE REQUEST (GENERAL) Y�
Tracking Number: 3335421127
Date Time Received: 1/24/2011 11:27:32 AM
Created By: Chris Thompson (Admin Employee)
CONTACT INFORMATION f
First Name: Mel
Last Name: Williams
Business Name:
Email: Iem4153 @yahoo.com
Daytime Phone:
Fax:
Address:
City:
State / Province:
Zip / Postal Code:
Country:
ISSUE LOCATION
Street:
Unit:
City: Spokane Valley
State: WA
Zip: 99206
Comments:
REQUEST DETAILS
Nature of the request...
There is a very serious problem with a sink hole under the road, a hole the size of a cantalope has opened up thru
the asphalt. When you look in the hole it is very large underneath. This is located in the roadway 27th and S. Pines,
SW corner, about 3 ft from the street drain to the curb side of the road. I am very concerned as this can cave in at
any time. In my mind this is a very unsafe, would be a very serious emergency.
REQUEST ACTIVITY
1/24/2011 12:57:27 PM -- Deven Nickerson - RESOLVED
Note to Citizen: Mel, Thank you for reporting the problem, we found it and were able to fill it in. We will continue
to monitor the problem area. If you see anything else please contact us and we will take care of itl Thanks, Deven
Nickerson Public Works Department City of Spokane Valley 509-720-5008
1/24/2011 12:55:48 PM -- Deven Nickerson - RESOLVED
Internal Note: Filled the hole with coldmix, we will continue to monitor the area for problems.<br/> This item has
been re-assigned to Deven Nickerson.
1/24/2011 11:28:20 AM --Chris Thompson - SUBMITTED
Internal Note: Forwarded email to Deven.
1/24/2011 11:27:49 AM --Chris Thompson -SUBMITTED
Internal Note: This request was submitted by Chris Thompson.
1/24/2011 11:27:32 AM --Chris Thompson (Admin Employee) - SUBMITTED
WORK ORDER FORM
CITIZEN SERVICE REQUEST (GENERAL) - _ - ' - - - 1,
Tracking Number: 3339131938
Date Time Received: 1/25/2011 7:38:25 PM
Created By: Stephen Drassen (Citizen)
CON ACT r'NFORMATIO '
First Name: Stephen
Last Name: Drassen
Business Name:
Email: sdrassen @comcast.net
Daytime Phone: (509)209-7855
Fax:
Address: 5207 S Wyngate Ln
City: Veradale
State/Province: WA
Zip/ Postal Code: 99037
Country:
ISSUE LOCATIOJ1
Street:
Unit:
City: Spokane Valley
State: WA
Zip: 99206
Comments:
'UEST DETAILS
Nature of the request..
The street light directly in front of our house is about to go out-turning off and on every 1/2 hour or so. Please service...thank
youl
REQUEST ACTIVITY
1/25/2011 7:46:02 PM -- Chris Thompson - DISMISSED
Note to Citizen: Hi, the street lights are serviced by your electric company -Avista (489-0500-Customer Service),
Inland Power(747-7151), Modern (928-4540) or Vera (924-3800). Thank you, have a great night. Chris Thompson,
720-5110
1/25/2011 7:38:25 PM -- Stephen Drassen (Citizen) - SUBMITTED
E-Gov Services Page 1 of 3
a/Z -- i f I I 6000C-6-1
L Close Google Map Window j
41 .. r -
d a `8..vg,� EB�a�eCikhfrd
i.
3 y 0.'4
N
- E Fra,ci:..re--- % o-
yr t,r:an
=I` �� FTiL4Iry!
z
a/
� Oro
•8VeieslAro C.)n ' E WE Av+
F smerefda E Uprl;cr Dr ' Trentwood° ..0 Trentfoo-m�y z
1.undp.A
m i
GerCnri. e 0O 0133 a Z S I 0
EEucl4Ava O� '- - - -I _z '' • H,1n!?rd 1
EFrederrkA're -' - n Pvrk
0 . M;IAto- 2 _ �"
}er- E 11en1,1Y° ' 4 Q Sro= one S:}j g Liberty Lake•d llsJnn�y.e Garry POk '-• C1l rii ^'`!eY a E llssonAre
- CEp nna VaSey LI Oeerwcres .
E Br45r}/1.T 1••'•••' l3
a— -- 0, %! E eraadwsik a 27 gu -E Counts
E Trera A' - Ginn AUaS_
. w i;• U
Dishmari
'a _ .^ E Sprearim:- U - 7 E S,xa.7A Ave E Spraguakve
r'joP!_ra'mi'I y �} rn 01
0 in E ire ,hP,e L1 Oppor1w y_ . 1 Veradate . x
4
0;i-wan H.
O. }
Nn7 ralPleit L . E 1E.: Sx 0 O
- V A U E 1701 Ar4 ` o a
Lincoln N HPljtts m ‘
P E2ir,k:a $7 62411 Aye
N a I}CO[.l� c 43In1 krt. kMd A'N
4) N
3 7N Avx G1
eh
k .,,:e E AdYi e
Et
a 27
i
E s7r4 Rya 3,41 N
V
E•
o
4 k Map data 02010 Google-
Tracking Number Ticket Name LocatIon
3306372218 Snow Plow/Removal 3410 N DONWOOD ST
3306282004 Snow Plow/Removal 1222 S DISHMAN RD
3306261922 Snow Plow/Removal 1710 S BURNS RD
3306251912 Snow Plow/Removal 303 N BURNS RD
3306231849 Snow Plow/Removal 9407 E 12TH AVE
3305681617 Snow Plow/Removal 14203 E ALKI AVE
3305601613 Snow Plow/Removal 1920 N SARGENT RD
3305521607 Snow Plow/Removal 9520 E ARCHERY AVE
3304541306 Snow Plow/Removal 9420 E 7TH AVE
3304451249 Snow Plow/Removal 5803 E WOODLAWN DR
3304441238 Snow Plow/Removal 1316 N SUNDERLAND RD
3304301203 Snow Plow/Removal 12824 E GUTHRIE OR
3304031116 Snow Plow/Removal 1107 N TSCHIRLEY RD
3303991108 Snow Plow/Removal 7818 E KIERNAN AVE
3303911057 Snow Plow/Removal 2107 S UNION RD
3301711907 Snow Plow/Removal 1117 S DISHMAN RD
lit fry//xxnxnx7 ar>;nc71ink rn de..r.link/arimin/awfinn line/nnfinn line man_a.an 1/1 1/2l1 1
E-GovLink {Action Line} Page 1 of 60
131 total Action Item Requests LIST (FULL) REPORT * Non-Listed street Address
Submitted Date: Form: Snow
3308081255 1/11/2011 Status: RESOLVED Plow/ Removal
Submitted By: Robert Phone: (509) 590- Contact Address: Contact City/State/Zip:
Dickinson 8667 18316 E Sharp Ave
Assigned To: Chris Department: City Days Allowed: 0 day Days taken to
Thompson Employees (s) Complete: 0 day(s)
Issue/Problem Location: 18316 E SHARP AVE City/State/Zip:
Additional Info:
Nature of the complaint/suggestion... I was just wondering why our street has only been plowed one time
this year and that was a week after the first snow In November. I know we are last on the plow list as we are
residential street on the valley floor.
Chris Thompson - RESOLVED - 1/11/2011 1:08:08 PM
Note to Citizen: Thank you for letting us know about your street. We did not plow residential streets after the
last storm. Your address will put a dot on our map to see where we have the most problem areas. We are not
plowing or grading residential streets before the next snow. Later tonight we will plow the priority 1's, 2's and 3's
which are the main arterials, secondary arterials and residential hillsides. You can see the priority list on our
website spokanevalley.org, departments, public works, snow plowing.
Chris Thompson sent a notification of this request to contact robert988 @yahoo.com on 1/11/2011 1:08:08 PM
- SUBMITTED -
3307961222 Submitted Date: Status: RESOLVED Form: snow
1/11/2011 Plow/ Removal
Submitted By: Sharon Phone: 926-6045 Contact Contact City/State/Zip:
Holton Address:
Assigned To: Chris Department: City Days Allowed: Days taken to
Thompson Employees 0 day(s) Complete: 0 day(s)
Issue/Problem Location: 3303 N VELOX ST City/State/Zip:
Additional Info:
Nature of the complaint/suggestion... Very Icy In trailer park off Barker and Donwood.
Chris Thompson - RESOLVED - 1/11/2011 12;57:58 PM
Internal Note: Spoke to Shane, we will be deicing/sanding In the trailer park later today. I called Mrs. Holton
to let her know.
Chris Thompson - SUBMITTED - 1/11/2011 12:22:34 PM
Internal Note: This request was submitted by Chris Thompson.
- SUBMITTED -
3307791136 Submitted Date: Status: Form: Report a
1/11/2011 INPROGRESS Pothole
Submitted By: Unknown Phone: Contact Address: Contact City/State/Zip:
http://www.egovlink.com/spokanevalley/adminlaction line/action line list.asp?screen in... 1/11/2011
Sc'TY �'
pökane
iL11E3rT®
11707 E Sprague Ave Suite 106 • Spokane Valley WA 99206
509.921.1000 • Fax: 509.921.1008 • cityhall®spokanevalley.org
Brainstorming
Executive & Legislative Support— Goals and Strategies
22 2/1/2011
0-1
Facilitate the achievement of annually established Council Goals (all years).
2011-2016
• Annually develop objectives and strategies to accomplish Council Goals
• Report goal attainment progress to the community in the City Manager's
Budget Message
G-2
Update the Financial Forecast. The Financial Forecast's expected revenues
and expenses, incorporates the fiscal elements of departmental business
plans, identifies fiscal constraints and proposes formulas for Council consid-
eration in composing a budget-balancing approach that itemizes necessary
service reductions or increased revenues, or a combination thereof.
2011-2016
• Update the Financial Forecast on an ongoing basis
• Update departmental business plans
• Calculate the fiscal impacts identified in business plans
• Assess revenue and expenditure trends
• Merge trend data with business plan cost data
• Determine the financial delta
• Develop best case and worst case scenarios
• Formulate revenue and expenditure options
• Determine affordable service levels
• Select budget-balancing options to implement
• Obtain Council authorization to proceed with selected option(s)
G-3 (Courcii Goq
Implement records indexing and phase in a document imaging system City
department by City department with the goal of achieving city-wide implemen
tation in 2011.
2011
• Continue phasing in index of documents from each department
• Maintain full document imaging and continue archiving
documents
G-4 (Council Goal)
Prepare Legislative Agenda for Council consideration.
2011
• Present to Council a draft Legislative Agenda to consider what matters
the City Council wishes to promote on behalf of the City for the potential
inclusion in the Governors Budget
22 2/1/2011
Executive & Legislative Support— Workload Statistics
—
— —
1
53
. .8:;17
I ' 3,.11r_
+* r:ti; :
G-1
Meetings w/Departrnent Heads to attain Council Goals
52
52
Goal Attainment Progress (Business Plan) posted to website by February
15 annually
4
4
Number of established Council Goals
6
7
6
Number of annual Council meetings
55
59
52
G-2
Draft of Departmental Business Plans completed annually by June 30
g
-
g
Financial Forecast reviewed and updated annually
g
g
Balanced budget presented to City Council annually
g
g
G-3
Number of boxes archived
181
195
82
Number of public record requests processed
347
324
331
Number of contracts processed
166
216
171
Prepare analysis of electronic filing annually
4
23 2/1/2011
Executive & Legislative Support— Performance Results
The-Erst Citizen Survey was performed in O . and is scheduled to be performed again in 2011 & 2013.
oai
f'erformarwc
- =rte
S�
�:cr}F:-'
;a*
G-1
Percent of citizens satisfied with Council Goals and City's direction
—
82%
—
(citizen survey)
Average percent of citizens who attend Council meetings (citizen survey)
—
21%
—
Percent of citizens who rated the services provided by the City with a
positive rating (citizen survey)
—
90%
—
Pertaining to living in Spokane Valley, percent of citizens who gave a
positive rating (citizen survey)
—
98%
—
Pertaining to the City listening to its citizen's, percent of citizens who
gave a positive rating (citizen survey)
—
75%
—
Pertaining to the City welcoming citizen involvement, percent of citizens
who gave a positive rating(citizen survey)
—
85%
—
G-2
Pertaining to the overall value of services received for City tax dollars
—
83%
—
paid, percent of citizens who gave a positive rating{citizen survey)
.
Dollars spent City-wide per capita (all accounts year-end figure)
$58,936,857
$67,574,808
$46,215,308
' pending year-end adjustments
_88,920
-89,440
_90,210
$663/capita
$756/capita
$512/capita
G-3
Percent of response per public record requests completed in 5 days
99%
100%
100%
100%
Percent of all documents and forms indexed on City's website by year
end
100%
100%
100%
100%
Percent of prompt indexing of Council documents within 5 working days
100%
100%
100%
100%
24 2/1/2011
Executive c Legislative Support— Office of the City Attorney Goals and Strategies
G-1 201
To have a fully operational City Attorney's Office that proactively assists in pro-
gram development, advises all departments on legal issues in a timely matter,
and manages all potential and existing litigation.
1-2016
• Review programs
• Monitor workload &workload changes
• Track response times
• Identify deficient areas
G-2
To assist other departments in analyzing and mapping existing processes to
determine compliance with the law and whether higher levels of customer ser-
vice can be achieved.
2011
• Finalize an index for all public records from each department,with a cor-
responding electronic directory system with a common City-wide format
• Identify all types of permits, approvals, permissions or waivers granted
by the City, and specify the procedures to be followed for each item, in-
cluding deadlines
• Create a process whereby the basis for all conditions placed upon a de-
velopment project is identified,with a specific checklist to be followed
prior to the imposition of each condition
• Create and maintain a purchasing manual
• Maintain and update all form contracts used by all departments
• Update and maintain all City franchises
• Maintain and update all form contracts used by all departments
• Work with Human Resources on all personnel policies
2012-2015
• Maintain and update all form contracts used by all departments
G-3
Advise, draft and amend all code provisions identified by Council. Evaluate
regulations specified in the Sprague/Appleway Revitalization Plan as adopted
and amended by the City Council, as well as prepare requested changes to the
Subarea Plan code and Comprehensive Plan.
2011
• Meet with staff and Council to identify changes
• Draft language to implement same
• Advise Council and staff on options
27 2/1/2011
Executive Legislative Support— Office f the City Attorney Goals and.Strategies, continued
28 2/1/2011
G-4
Assist in providing consistency in all land use applications and decisions.
2011
• organize and update all rules regarding vesting and imposition of condi-
tions on development
• Provide training/presentations
• Update through WSAMA
• Present to other jurisdictions
G-5
Draft and complete Contract and Purchasing Guidelines
2011
• Research alternatives
• Draft and finalize summary of contract and purchasing procedures
• Advise client
G-6
Improve efficiency of day-to-day advice to client
2011
• Include minor tasks in tracking tasks
• Identify start date on task list to client
• Track requests in and out
• Contract review—stamp date received and signed
• Index for contracts—add to public drive with security restrictions
G-7
Appear and represent City in all litigation and administrative hearings and advise
Council and staff
2011
• Work with staff to gain thorough factual knowledge of cases
• Provide Council with timely updates and seek authorization as appropriate
G-8
Draft, revise and advise staff and Council concerning all contracts and Interlocal
Agreements.
2011
• Draft staff contracting guidelines for better understanding and ease of use
• Update form contracts
• Timely contract review and advise staff
• Create and maintain Index of Interlocal Agreements
28 2/1/2011
Executive & Legislative Support— Office of the City Attorney Workload Statistics and
Performance Results
•
•
I 1 _
G-1
Work order requests processed
388
252
283
Legal memorandums
90
114
83
95%
G-2
Public record requests processed (does not include day-to-day file re-
view in response to public record requests processed by City Clerk)
29
29
15
G-6
Litigation matters including enforcement matters.
Enforcement—Opened
Closed
105
94
71
68
21
58
70
7
67
G-2
Training classes taught
8
11
3
G-6
Average number of days for completion of tasks
—
—
12
Ordinances and resolutions drafted
40
59
39
G-8
Contracts reviewed
166
75
93
29 2/1/2011
I 1 _
Ci-1
Legal service cost per hour compared to outside counsel
$73 vs$250
$74 vs 5250
$65 vs$20
Percent of internal clients reporting legal advice was timely
91%
63%
82%
95%
G-2
Percentage of internal clients reporting that legal advice was clear and
relevant
95%
94%
74%
G-6
Business plan major goals identified and completed on schedule
—
—
—
Average timeframe for advice provided from time requested
—
—
—
Contract templates are available on Public drive when needed
—
—
—
Attorneys are available when needed
—
—
—
29 2/1/2011
Operations and Administrative Services— Goals and Strategies
37 211/2011
G-1
Respond to internal and external impacts on the City's human resources func-
tion in order to recruit and retain a well-qualified workforce.
2011-2015
• Use more pro-active recruitment techniques
• Evaluate City's work environment to encourage retention of existing staff
• Expand New Employee Orientation and ongoing training
• Develop processes that improve employee access to information, and
make the best use of technology in order to administer cost effectively
G-2
Enhance community interest and involvement in City government
2011-2016
• Adopt& implement a comprehensive six-year strategic communications
plan supporting Council goals & enhancing community interest& involve-
ment in city government based on 2010 decennial census
• Promote a unique, Spokane Valley identity especially for the celebration
of the City's ten-year anniversary
• Develop reports on Spokane Valley demographic and economic trends
• Expand forums for informing and involving the public through the devel-
opment of formal customer service feedback system, and enhancement
of community communications outreach program
G-3
Formalize public accountability in City operations through incorporating the
Business Plan into decision making, conducting a periodic community survey,
and establishing a toolbox for evaluation the City's contract services. An open,
collaborative government is the third Core Value adopted by City Council_
2011-2016
• Incorporate the Business Plan in the City's decision-making process to
enhance accountability through implementation of performance results
• Implement a periodic community survey to objectively monitor customer
satisfaction
• Evaluate City's contract services
• Implement contract audit program
• Finalize a managed competition process
G-4
Audit of existing risk management practices and further development of the
Risk Management Program for the City
2011-2016
• Assess whether City property is properly insured
• Develop procedures for minimizing claims costs
• Provide recommendations to the City Manager for program development
37 211/2011
Operations and Administrative Services.- orkload Statistics
I
I1Vr9c142cl
-
_ -
G-1
Number of City employees
89
88
79
Personnel action forms processed
148
168
260
Number of training classes facilitated or coordinated
9
11
12
Interviews conducted
154
66
73
Employees hired ('regular employees—permanent FT/PT employees;
limited term;does not include temporary/seasonal employees)
15
9
6
Average number of applications received per recruitment cycle
94.8
77.8
41.5
G-2
Media releases issued
203
201
167
185
Total Media stories
673
556
855
680
Public information contacts with the media
273
201
193
250
Community newsletters produced
3 regular
11 special
3 regular
3 regular
Reduced from
4 to 2 due to
2011 funding
38 211/2011
Operations and Administrative Services— Performance Results
39 2/1/2011
G-1
Percentage rating for employee satisfaction with Human Resources
97.6%
98%
97.8%
95%
Percentage rate of employee turnover
9%
6.2%
8.2%
Human Resource full-time employees (FTE)per 100 employees
2
2
2
Percentage of annual non-manager performance reviews completed
within 30 days of anniversary date
53A2%
37%
39.7%
Average number of days to complete recruitment
130
55.8
50.54
G-2
Customer satisfaction re:contact with City Hall as it pertains to a positive
impression of employees (citizen survey):
Knowledge
Responsiveness
Courtesy
Overall impression
—
—
—
—
88%
90%
89%
86%
—
—
—
—
92%
94%
93%
90%
Customer use of website(citizen survey):
—
26%
—
36%
Customer satisfaction with Public Information services(citizen survey):
—
92%
—
97%
Earned media stories per FTE in Public information Office
162
96
166
180
Community E-Newsletter distribution per capita
_0031%
2236%
22.6
39 2/1/2011
Operations and Administrative Services— Finance & Information Technology
Goa[s and Strategies
G-1
2011
Assist in Street Master Plan financing
• Review consultant's plan
• Review list of needed improvements
• Determine costs
• Determine timing
• Determine affect on city financial stability
• Determine options
• Prepare plan
G-2
2011-2016
Maintain a consistent level of service in payroll, accounts payable, budget
• Add Accounting Technician in 2010
preparation and information technology services (during a period of high
• Add Accountant in 2010
growth).
• Add Information Technology(IT)positions as needed (2011 & 2012)
Upgrade telephone, network and fiber infrastructure
45 2/1/2011
Operations and Administrative Services— Finance Information Technology
Vxlorldod Statistics & Performance Results
Dept.
related
#of accounts payable checks (Includes wires & payroll benefit
checks)
2853
3102
2899
Dept.
related
Dollars spent City-wide (all accounts—excluding fund 901—pending
year-end adjustments)
$58,936,857
$67,574,808
$46,215,308
.
Number of phone lines
28
35
36
.
Number of workstations
140
145
148
Number of servers&appliances supported
33
37
39
Number of PC's installed or replaced
20
40
4
46 2/2/2011
Dept.
related
Finance expenditures/City wide expenditures
(less uncollectible gambling tax)
.0124
.0134
.0188
.
Dollar value of accounts payable processed
$48,551,658
$59,318,922
$41,250,418
.
Dollar value of gross payroll processed
$4,849,357
$5,407,369
$5,829,128
Help desk requests per IT FTE per month
55
75
80
IT FTE per number of workstations
70
72.5
74
- Network availability%
99%
99%
99%
46 2/2/2011
Community Development— Goals and Strateuies
57 2/1/2011
G-1 (C^vrcil Gca'
Complete Shoreline Master Plan
2011
• Complete Shoreline Inventory—Completed in 2010
• Complete the Shoreline Master Program update
• Conduct public outreach
• Conduct public hearing at Planning Commission on draft document
• Council adoption of Plan
• Washington State mandates adoption of an updated Shoreline Master
Program by 2013
G-2
2011
Update UGA boundaries through regional process
• Identify potential JPA's in 2010 City update
• Work through regional process to have UGA's/Joint Planning Areas as-
signed
• Interlocal Agreement with Spokane County adopting standards for devel-
opment in UGA's
G-3 ;Gounc:i Goal)
2011
Complete a Bike/Pedestrian Plan
• Work in coordination with the Traffic Engineer to complete a work pro-
gram
• Hire any technical expertise needed for the Plan
• Complete field work on existing facilities
• Input data into GIS system
• Conduct public outreach to provide input to the Plan
• Prepare a draft Plan
• Conduct a Public Hearing on the proposed Plan
• City Council adoption of the Plan and incorporation into the Comprehen-
sive Plan
G-7 (Council Goal)
2011
Complete ADA Inventory and Plan
• Work in coordination with City-wide committee to complete a work pro-
gram/hold stakeholder meeting with interested citizens
• Complete field work on existing facilities
• Input data into GIS system
• Prepare a draft report and draft Transition Plan
• Conduct a Public Hearing on the proposed Plan
• City Council adoption of the Plan and incorporation into the Comprehen-
sive Plan
57 2/1/2011
Community Development— Goals andlitralipies, cvlinued
r
. -
; trateg-e
G-5
Yearly Update of Comprehensive Plan
2011
• In addition to any public initiated comprehensive plan change requests,
modify Sprague and Appleway Corridors Subarea Plan related to Com-
prehensive Plan as directed by City Council, update 6-year Transporta-
tion Improvement Plan, and make any other required changes
• Process through Planning Commission and City Council
G-6
Continue to make system improvements to the permitting process
2011
• Strengthen customer service
• Work on identified improvements to the permit process
• Assign work teams from various divisions to different tasks
• Work teams develop work plan and time frame for each change
• Implement change and train staff
• Conduct developer forum to report progress and solicit new input
G-7
Corridors Subarea Plan regulations as directed by Council
2011-2012
• Complete unfinished code amendments from public workshops con-
ducted in 2010
• Process through Planning Commission and City Council
G-8
Work on code amendment's area plans that stimulate economic development
or improve neighborhoods
• Work with Council and Planning Commission to generate a list of poten-
tial changes that could enhance economic development such as Planned
Action Ordinance for Spokane Industrial Park, or riverfront area; revisit
permitted uses in the Mixed-Use Avenue along Trent Avenue
• Prepare report with feasibility of projects, prioritize projects
• Work on top priority project(s)
G-9
Explore opportunities for regional partnering with Spokane County and the City
of Spokane with regard to permit and inspection processes and code admini-
station
2011
• Work with building department staffs to identify partnering opportunities.
Develop strategies for implementing regional services where possible.
• Develop coordinated approach to permit process to eliminate jurisdic-
tional differences where practical and simplify coordination where possi-
ble
• Promote regionally consistent enforcement of regulations through ordi-
nance development and regularly scheduled coordination meetings
• Develop and implement a regional web permitting portal as resources
become available
58 2/1/2011
Community D vel pm nt--- Goals and Strategies, continued
59 2/1/2011
G-9
Continued
• Host yearly multi jurisdictional developer's forums to share new regional
efforts with developers and to generate developer involvement in re-
gional process improvement efforts
• Work on other projects aimed at improving regional permitting and in-
spection processes as directed by Council
G-10
Complete 10-year update of the Comprehensive Plan
2011
• Notify utility districts, school districts, and other outside agencies about
need for updated information
• Incorporate any new state mandated information
• Process through Planning Commission and City Council
G-11
Migration from PLUS SYSTEM
The County plans on discontinuing the PLUS permit tracking system sometime
within the next 3-5 years. This will require staff from Community Development
and Finance to study options and make a recommendation to Council.
2011-2016
• Keep in contact with County staff and possibly form inter-jurisdictional
workgroup study options and make recommendation for purchase
• Once purchased, depending on system, there will be staff time to work
with selected contractor to accommodate our processes and finally train
staff.
59 2/1/2011
C muni4 D v l pt n t— Workload Statistics
.
' orkload
:
_;
_
Dept.
related
Permit Center counter walk-ins
4315
5448
5381
417.50
Permit Center phone calls
4472
4945
4890
68%
5 work days
Construction permits issued
3535
2993
3340
77%
25 work days
Building inspections performed-
Residential
4480
5241
5610
100%
25 work days
Building inspections performed-
Commercial
2177
2504
2324
—
95%
Code compliance complaints
investigated
931
840
617
Right-of-Way inspections performed
5183
7379
6708
Service population
88,920
89,440
90,210
Number of Planning Commission meetings
24
13
14
Number of code amendments
7
7
12
60 2/1/2011
Dept.
related
Number of permits issued/processed/reviewed
per FTE(Plan Exam-2; Build. lnsp-3; Permit Spec-3)
392.78
332.55
417.50
Residential building permit issuance (April&July)
—
65%
68%
5 work days
Average tenant improvement permit issuance (May&August)
—
100%
77%
25 work days
Average response time for first review
—
99%
100%
25 work days
Percent of Citizens who gave the City a positive rating as it pertains to
satisfaction with services regarding Land use, planning and zoning
—
83%
—
95%
60 2/1/2011
Parks and Recreation— Goals and Strategies
68 2/1/2011
G-1
Implement recommendations of the Parks and Recreation Master Plan, includ-
ing the continued development of aquatic and recreation programs that serve
the needs of our citizens.
2011-2016
• Develop& implement six-year capital improvement program
• Explore options for major sources of funding
• Pursue park acquisitions and development
• Explore adding additional recreation programs to meet customer need
• Continue to contract for park maintenance &aquatic operation services
• Partner with local jurisdictions for joint use agreements
G-2
Update the CenterPlace Regional Marketing and Communications Plan
2011
• Increase seasonal staffing to accommodate a higher level of service for
events
• Develop "CenterPlace's Partner Services"with local event planners
• Contract marketing services to help implement marketing plan
• Expand website to include more links& interactive pricing guide
• Expand Red Rock involvement in events as our"in-house"caterer
G-3
Make facility improvements to CenterPlace.
2011-2016
• Develop land in front of CenterPlace
• Schedule preventative maintenance and facility updates to maintain Cen-
terPlace in new condition
• Explore opportunities to provide additional services
• Explore updating sound systems in the Great Room& Lounge
• Investigate construction of outdoor wedding gazebo
G-4
Expand senior services to serve changing needs and expectations of the sen-
ior population
2011-2016
• Challenge to serve current age demographics and to attract new partici-
pants
• Add new, active programming
• Increase involvement with neighboring retirement communities
• Educate the community at-large about the purpose and potential of the
Senior Center
G-5
Work with Centennial Trail Partners to develop 20 Year Plan.
2011-2016
• Seek grant opportunities
• Develop a long range maintenance plan
68 2/1/2011
Parks and Recreation— Workload Statistics
69 2/1/2011
G-1
Acres maintained
126
126
126
Trees Planted
5
11
25
10 new per
year
Overall number of park facility
reservations per year
222
258
252
+10 per year
Number of recreation classes offered
77
75
90
+10 per year
Spokane Valley population
88,920
89,440
90,210
Number of open swim hours available/season
980
1,200
1,326
Maintain 2008
hours
Number of swim lesson/team registrations
1,220
1,430
1365
G-2
Number of area businesses/hotels contacted for use of CenterPlace
24,400
24,400
24,400
Contact all in
region
Number of reservations per year
721
815
823
+10% per
year
Number of operating hours per year
4,633
4,633
4,633
Number of room use hours booked per year
4,780
5,514
5,441
G-4
Number of participants in Senior programs
or workshops per year
36,840
38,001
34,624
+10%per
year
Average age of Seniors participating
in programs
74.85
75.70
74.90
Number of Senior programs offered per year
50
50
50
60 per year
(ultimate)
G-5
Miles of Centennial Trail
6.78
6.78
6378
Number of grants applied for
(Applied for by Trails Partners)
0
0
0
1 per year
Labor hours to maintain Centennial Trail
900
900
900
Maintain 2008
level
69 2/1/2011
Parks and Recreation— Performance Re suits
70 2/1/2011
G-1
Developed park acres per 1 000 population
1.4
1.4
1.4
Recreation program recovery vs direct cost
167%
105%
110%
Maintain 2008
recovery
Parks& Recreation budget per capita
$29.74
$31.44
$32.43
Percentage of citizens who participated in a recreation
program or activity(citizen survey)
—
45%
—
Percentage of citizens who have visited a City of
Spokane Valley park(citizen survey)
—
84%
—
Percentage of citizens rating recreation programs or
classes with a positive rating (citizen survey)
—
95%
—
Percentage of citizens rating recreation centers or
facilities(citizen survey)
—
93%
—
Percentage of citizens rating quality of parks
(citizen survey)
—
98%
—
G-2
Percentage of facility capacity per Great Room reserved
26%
21%
19%
Percentage cost recovery per CenterPlace
(CenterPlace revenues covered_%of the expenses. Expenditures do
not include building replacement funds)
68%
63%
61
Percentage of area businesses utilizing CenterPlace
.0067%
.0079%
.0075%
Reach for
25%
Percentage of facility capacity per Lounge reserved
15.7%
11%
23%
Percentage of regional use of facility
18%
24%
16%
30%
(ultimate)
70 2/1/2011
Parks and Recreation— Performance Results, continued
_ _
-.._
__. J
�...�.
4E
: i .�
_target
G-4*
Level of satisfaction with quality of Senior services
(citizen survey)
—
91%
—
Percentage of Seniors over 60 in Spokane Valley
per capita (Census data is not current)
14.5%
15.76%
17.01%
Percentage of City of Spokane Valley Seniors who
participate in programs per those who attend Health&Wellness
Programs(age 50 and up)
14%
14%
14%
G-5
Cost to maintain per capita per trail mile
$.04
$.04
$.04
Percentage of successful grant applications
(Applied for by Trails Partners)
0
0
0
Miles of Trail per 1000 households
.076
.076
.076
*Senior numbers will vary because different ages are used. Some use age 50, others age 60
71 2/1/2011
Public Works— Goals and Strategies
78 2/1/2011
G-1
Implement the Street Master Plan Phase 1 (when adopted by Council).
2011-2016
• Implement Pavement Management Program and Transportation Improve-
ment Plan (TIP) as approved by Council
G-2 (Council Goal)
Continue with winter street maintenance plan.
2011-2016
• Explore options for purchase of street maintenance/stormwater facility
• Begin implementation of winter plan
• Continue emergency winter operation in 2010/2011 with Poe Asphalt, Inc.
• Conduct request for proposal (RFP)for future winter maintenance support
G-3
Continue optimization of the City's traffic signal system
2011-2016
• Update and revise signal timing plans for the city's major intersections
• Coordinate the design of the funded ITS projects
• Continue providing traffic related services on new development proposals
G-4
Continue implementation of the Stormwater program
• Develop plan for storm drain maintenance & operations
• Develop street sweeping plan
• Develop a six-year capital program for stormwater facilities
• Develop a six-year plan for compliance with the Underground Injection Con-
trol (U1C) program
• Continue to assist in meeting the City's National Pollution Discharge Elimi-
nation System (NPDES) Phase II permit requirements
• Purchase a site and construct a City street waste decant facility
G-5
Implement Capital Improvement Projects as approved by Council
201 1-2016
• Continue to monitor, update, and implement the Transportation Improve-
ment Plan (TIP)
• Pursue additional funding opportunities for capital projects
• Continue coordination with other departments on non-transportation capital
projects
G-6 (Council Goal)
Continue involvement with the County and Department of Ecology (DOE) regard-
ing the Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDL)and Wastewater Treatment
20111-2016
• Coordinate with County on construction of wastewater treatment plan an
implementation of TMDL
78 2/1/2011
Public Works— workload Statistics
79 2/1/2011
G-1
Centerline Lane miles of street maintained
438
460
460
Number of citizen action requests for street maintenance
1875
1078
1166
Street sweeping (in tons)
545.4
472.92
796.5
G-3
Traffic signals maintained
84
86
86
Traffic counts performed
159
158
133
School beacons maintained
16
20
20
Traffic signs maintained
14,000
14,000
14,000
G-4
Number of drywells
7,300
7,330
7343
Number of drywells cleaned
267
245
167
New drywells registered
30
33
10
G-5
Dollars of Capital Improvements(actual dollars spent)
$17,475,243
$21,482,584
$7,008,066
Number of construction projects managed
18
28
30
Full-time employees for Capital Improvement Projects(CIP)
9
9
9
79 2/1/2011
Public Works— Performance Results ABA.
80 2,/1/20I1
73°f
G-182
Percent of citizens who rated snow
removal as positive(citizen survey)
—
Ton of cold patch for potholes
27
17.55
8.10
Percent of citizens who rated street repairs
as positive(citizen survey)
—
73%
—
Percent of citizens who rated clean streets
as positive (citizen survey)
—
88%
—
Street maintenance cost per capita
$44.83
$49.67
$42.88
Lane miles maintained per 1000 population
4.926
5.14
5.10
Street sweeping expenditures per capita
$5.24
$3.83
4.86
Street condition based on the Overall Condition Index
70
70
70
G-4
Percent of citizens who rated quality of storm
drainage as positive (citizen survey)
—
92%
—
Cost per ERU (Equivalent Residential Unit)
$21.00
$21.00
$21.00
Cubic yards of new drywells constructed
1,200 cy
1,320 cy
400cy
G-5
Dollars of Capital Improvement Projects
managed per FTE
$1,941,694
$2,386,954
$778,674
Percent of grant funds vs.City funds
73% grant
27% City
72%grant
28%City
64%grant
36%City
80 2,/1/20I1
SCITY OF
Spokane
•
11.2
•
alle
Annual Work Plan for 2011
2011 Budget Goals
Including Tasks & Timeline
and
Department Objectives
Executive &Legislative Support
Operations &Administrative Services
Community Development
Public Works
Parks &Recreation
Public Safety/Police
2011 Budget Goals Work Plan
Public Works - Tasks and Timeline:
� p
Continue monitoring wastewater issues, including govern-
ance of wastewater facilities, and pursuit of the most efficient
and economical methods to ensure the continuation of waste-
water discharges licenses.
Continue Monitoring Q II 2011 Q2 2011 Q3 2011 I Q4 2011
IYaslewnter Issues
Jan Feb Mar :Apr May hui Jul Aug Sep I Oct Nov Dec
1 Analysis and review with the County, City of Spo-
kane,and Dept, of Ecology regarding Wastewater -I° -�
_ 'Treatment Facility options.
Community Development - Tasks and Timeline:
a - �
Reevaluate regulations specified in the Sprague/Appleway Re-
vitalization Plan as adopted and amended by City Council.
Revahrule Regurlatioas Q1 2011 Q2 2011 Q3 2011 Q4 2011
Specified in the SA RP as adopted and antenrlerf,by
City Council. Jail Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
1 implement&evaluate regulations specified in SARP
•
as adopted and amended by City Council. ♦ ) 1
Community Development - Tasks and Timeline:
Develop a Shoreline Master Program to provide appropriate
regulatory protection for waters of statewide significance as
required by state statute,
Develop re Shoreline Master Program Q1 2011 Q2 2011 ' Q3 2011 Q4 201 1
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep 'Oct Nov Dec
1 Program which provides appropriate regulatory pro-
tection for waters of statewide significance as required + •
by state statute.
1
Department Objectives
Operations & Administrative Services
Q1 2011 Q2 2011 Q3 2011 Q4 2011
Deputy City Manager Division
Jan Feb Mar I Apr May Sun Jul Aug Sep :Oct Nov Dec
Propose service contract amendments to ease admini-
1 stration and allow control of costs 4 0
2 Define and formalize contracting guidelines 4 e
Evaluate City service and funding levels ~
Help complete contract and purchasing procedures • ~
Facilitate improvements based on the 2009 Citizen
_ Survey
Identify projects
Implement improvements
Identify and provide media training for authorized
6 spokespersons
7 Implement a comprehensive Public Information Plan e
8 Develop social media policy and train key staff toward
implementation
Involve all departments in implementation of a city-
9 wide comprehensive customer service request and
communications plan
10 Conduct biannual community survey
11 Monitor City-wide performance measures in Business I — — JI
Plan J
Q1 2011 Q2 2.011 032011 Q4 2011
Human Resources Division
Jan 12t1.) Mar Apr My 1wi Jul A Sep Oct Nov Dec
1 Initiate Welhiess Program for the City
2 Enhance employee recognition program fa
3 Establish initial employee development 4
opportunities through online learning
4 Develop and implement Employee Training
Guidelines
S Develop HR Intranet to provide information support to 45 days after
ono city employees system upgrade
-
Develop processes that improve employee access to To follow above
information
6 Provide support for the City's ADA Self Evaluation ! 0
and Plan
i
7 Evaluate the City's Unemployment and Labor and
Industries programs to reduce labor costs
—
Q12011 Q22011 3201:1 ' 42011
Community ty Develo Y ment
Jan Feb Moor Apr Mays Jug+ JuLl Aug Sep I Oct Nov Dec
I Develop a permit timeline report that can be published .Start after
on the City's website system upgrade
2 Update the interpretation notebook for UDC interpre- Ongoing
tations to ensure consistency — >-
3 Continue implementation of process improvements,
based on priority 4 — •
Staff Training
• Continue to provide department-wide training to
facilitate teamwork and efficiency
• Cross train within division to increase knowledge
base and provide better staff coverage
4 Complete internal procedures manual 4 0
u Meet with stakeholders for progress meeting
4 Establish City UGA through Spokane County's
l�`t Process (Due in 2011) •
Work with regional staff on UGA boundaries and
complete Joint Planning Agreements 4 •
T5 Remove Subarea Plan
4 ' 04
I,. 6 Code compliance–conduct field inspections for com-
pleting city-wide Clear View Triangle project 4 — •
7 Cross train administration staff to cover Planning
Commission meetings
8 Prepare a file archive plan and train staff to archive •
electronic and paper files to meet City specifications
9 Prepare an annexation process for the City of Spokane 4 `
Valley
Complete the annexation process forms for the City of 4
Spokane Valley
1p Complete the Shoreline Master Program update 4 �
•
Complete the Bike&Pedestrian Master Plan 41 I 0 1
gop Complete an ADA Inventory and Plan I
4
p 4 p
13 Work to finalize cross connection control Interlocal
'Agreements and implementation 4
I 14 Complete Sidewalk Priority Plan
15 Prepare and implement customer service training pro-
Igram 0
G Keep department Website pages up to date
a Public Works -- Q1 2011 2 2011 Q3 201 1 — Q4 2011
Capital improvement !,Ian Feb Mar ,Apr May Jute '.Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov [fee
1 Update six-year Transportation Improvement Plan for
.arterial roadways 4 " •
Indentify&recommend new projects _
'o •
Public hearing on draft plan
0—►
Seek Council approval of plan
e--f
Submit STP, TIB &other grant requests as available
2 Implement approved Capital Projects ;o _ ►
Valley Corridor—Environmental assessment and ION HOLD
preliminary engineering �
Park Road—Broadway to Indiana—(design)
Broadway Ave Safety Project—Park to Pines
(design&construction) ►
Various street preservation projects—(design&con-
4
struction) '^
Indiana Ave Extension—E. of Sullivan to Flora—
(Clesign&Construction)
Corbin Sanitary Sewer—(design&construction)
(20%carry over to 201 1) ►
Cronk Sanitary Sewer—(design&construction) ►
(carry over to 2011)
South Greenacres Phase IV—(design&construction) o
Approximately 75%carry over to 2011
Broadway Ave(Moore to Flora) (construction)
Indiana/Sullivan PCCP Intersection—(design&con-
struction)
Argonne Rd Corridor Improvements—(design&con- - S
struction)
Pines Rd Intelligent Transportation Systems(ITS) + EMI
(design&construction)
Sprague Ave ITS—(design& construction)
Mission Avenue reconstruction—Flora to Barker 4 •
(design/RW)
Sullivan/Euclid PCC(design)
N. Greenacres Trail(design)
Valley—Millwood Trail(planning&design) — -.
'Sullivan Road Bridge—(design) — P
Sidewalk Infill Project—(design&construction) 4 ►
Q1 2011 Q2 2011 Q3 2011 Q4 2011 1
Public Works- Stormwater
:Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jim Jul Aug Sup Oct. Nov Dee
__At—
I Develop six-year Stormwater Capital Improvement i
Plan s
2 Continue to implement the Ecology Phase II
Stormwater permit #
3 Renew or bid contracts with private contractors for Landscape Vactoring Sweeping
JJ Stormwater maintenance services 4
4 Complete Stormwater assessment rolls—update
commercial impervious surfaces map for 1/5 off com-
p.mercial parcels
5 Continue Underground Injection Control(1?C)as-
sessment and testing program(must be completed by 4 1
2013)
6 Design and construct a vactor liquid decant facility ON HOLD
Pending property
14 Provide input to Ecology's Stormwater permit renewal 3�
Lim _for the City 2012
Parks & Recreation — Recreation/ Aquatics Division
Increase partner programs with Liberty Lake,Spo- Q1 2011 Q2 2.011 1 Q3 2011 Q4 2011
kane County and 11w C'ity of Spokane
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jim i Jul Aug Sep i Oct Nov Dec
I As noted above l+ _.∎
I
Hold a spring theater camp Q1 2011 Q2 2011 Q3 2011 Q4 2011
Jain Feb Mai' Apr May JULL .,Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
I Program and facilitate Spring break youth theater 14 r 0
camp
Solicit sponsorships for the summer outdoor movies Q1 2011 Q2 2011 Q3 2011 Q4 201 1
•
Jan Feb Mar ;Apr May Jana :Jul Aug Sep Ocs Nov De}c
I ii Develop sponsorship program �..
2' i Solicit movie sponsors 4 •
Expand program marketing to social media sites Q1 2011 Q2 2011 I Q3 2011 Q4 2011
I
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jiro AA Aug Sep. Oct Nov Dec
1 Research social networking I
2 !Develop and determine program
I
I3 Market and launch program
Continue to seek increased funding for scholarships Q I 2011 Q2 2011 Q3 201 I I Q4 2011
for open swim and siG'iuuuing lessons
-- Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jim Alt Aug Sep I Oct Nov Dec
1 Partner with"Make a Splash"program throughout I I
year to obtain scholarship funding + i
Maintain fid!summer s Euiuuulug program I Q1 2011 Q2 2011 Q3 2011 Q4 201!
Jan Feb Mar Apr May hilt 1 Jul Aug S$p Oa! Nov Dec,I
1 Work with 2012 Budget to ensure swimming program
remains intact
• :i I — I i `
CenterPlace Division
Create an updated marketing plan or the next Q1 2,11 2 2,911 , Q3 2011 2011
gP 1 � ��..oil
five years �
! Jon Feb Moir Apr May Jim Jul Ate; Sep ,Oct Nov Dec
1 Determine availability of marketing resources 4-0
•
2 Develop plan utilizing reduced resources ` 0
Develop a list of meeting planners to promote Q1 2011 Q2 2011 Q3 2011 Q4 2011
CenterPlace through target marketing
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
1 Research and develop meeting planners list 4 I 0
r
Mite CenterPlace marketing nraterlals to promote Q1 2011 Q2 2011 Q3 2011 Q4 201 i
tourism to Spokane Milky
Jan Feb Ma' Apr May hill Jul; Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
1 Develop and organize marketing materials
2 Implement tourism program 4 0
•
Public Safety/ Police
Staff Gods, continued Ql 2011 Q2 2011 Q3 2011 Q4 2011
_ _ Jan Feb Mar Apr Mny Just. Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
6 Focus on the principles of ILP through the use of
SPOCAT analysis to identify crime trends and high • +
collision areas to better utilize resources.
7 Enhance the public's.perception of law enforcement
through community education on recognized police 4
best practices regarding police services.
8 With the acquisition of the air cards,move forward
with the new CAD/RMS-FANG interface to bring us 6
i
mwm
nto compliance with WACIC/NCIC and FCC
changes.
9 Be more proactive in tracking stolen property either
0.
with crime prevention techniques or databases.
Sioki e
= Valley
2011-13 Legislative Agenda
The following is the City of Spokane Valley's 2011-2013 legislative agenda, adopted by Council at their
October 26, 2010 Council meeting, amended by Council Consensus at their November 16, 2010 meeting
and again at the December 28, 2010 meeting:
Principle Items of Interest:
Budget Requests:
1. Priority #1: Support Funding for a Fire Sprinkler System at the Spokane Valley Food Bank.
Spokane Valley Partners has a new food warehouse which enables all collected food to be stored under
one roof. The new warehouse utilizes stainless steel, four-shelf carts to disburse food, re-fill shelves and
sort food in either the freezer of the cooler. Spokane Valley Partners hopes to install fire sprinklers in the
building for fire safety, allowing them to use the top shelf of the pallet racks and to satisfy a code
requirement that they will need to meet in the future. NFPA is addressing some of the difficulties
associated with shelf storage systems, with a proposed new definition of back-to-back shelf storage in the
2010 edition, The City of Spokane Valley supports funding for the fire sprinkler system at the Spokane
Valley food bank.
2. Priority #2: Seek Funding to Acquire Park Land Adjacent to Park Road Pool and Centennial Mirklle
School. The City of Spokane Valley has a population of 89,440 people, but only 172 acres of public
parks—drastically below the 6.25-10.5 acres/1,000 population (559-938 acres) specified in the City Parks
Master Plan. In the past, Spokane Valley has successfully partnered with the State Legislature to acquire
and develop Greenacres Park, adjacent to Central Valley School District's future elementary school. A
similar opportunity presents itself with Park Road Pool. The City requests $300,000 in funding to acquire
land adjacent to Park Road Pool for a park near Centennial Middle School.
Policy Requests:
1. Out-of-state Trucks to go to the Port of Entry.
The Spokane County Commissioners and Spokane Valley Councilmembers have heard some members of
the public voice a desire to bar heavy trucks from circumventing the port of entry. The Spokane Valley
Council wants to be appraised of any legislation proposed by ranchers or others, to mandate out-of-state
trucks weighing in at a port of entry. Additionally, the City would like to research options for pursuing
legislation to address the problem.
2. Pursue Law Enforcement District Enabling Legislation.
Law enforcement needs and resources vary in jurisdictions across the state like those for fire prevention
and suppression. More tools are needed to best consolidate, deploy and pay for law enforcement services.
Use of fire districts has proven to be a viable system for the provision of essential public services and
many jurisdictions may derive benefit from providing law enforcement services under a similar system,
The City requests that the Legislature consider a proposal and begin discussing the concept of a law
enforcement district.
Spokane Valley 2011 Adopted and Amended Legislative Agenda Page 1 oft
3. Secure State Funding for Statewide Communications Interooerability Infrastructure.
Locally, citizens have approved a sales tax increase of 1/10 of 1% for communication equipment;
however, this revenue is insufficient to fund all five items within that initiative. Interoperability is a
statewide concern and according to the Association of Washington Cities. Statewide, there is a $400
million problem to be resolved. The City recognizes that resolving this problem is a multi-year effort and
is supportive of any proposal that works towards resolution and additional finding.
4. State Environmental Policy Act—Amend Certain Requirements Imposed by State Law.
The City supports amending SEPA requirements to make the process less duplicative. SEPA thresholds
to consider: (1) Convert some discretionary SEPA exemptions to categorically exempt; (2) Raise
the level of SEPA exemptions across the board; (3) Make most actions within UGAs
categorically exempt with discretion given to cities; (4) Eliminate excessive costs associated with
providing notice for every Determination of Non-significance and Mitigated Determination of
Non-Significance application.
5. Support the Association of Washington Cities'legislative agenda items that serve the best interests of
the City of Spokane Valley.
Spokane Valley 2011 Adopied and Amended Legislative Agenda Page 2 of 2
•
GORDON THOMAS HONEYWELL
GOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS
LEGISLATIVE REPORT
To: City of Spokane Valley
From: Briahna Taylor, Gordon Thomas Honeywell Governmental Affairs
Date: January 24, 2011
Is` Committee Cutoff Deadline: February 2.1s‘
(Revised date after adopted by the Legislature)
CONTE7. TS:
1. Hill "Tracking
2. SupplementaI Budget
3. Legislative Agenda Items
1. Bill Tracking
GTH-GA has established a bill tracking system for those bills that impact the City of Spokane
Valley, To use the bill tracking system, bookmark the following link in your web browser:
http:// v,cgstate track,coinitexislviewrptlnn 1in.html`lever]t°4d2279bl1242
This link will automatically update each day to include new bills introduced that impact the City.
If you would like to add or remove a piece of legislation from the bill tracking system,please let
us know via e-mail: btaylorQ.gth-gov.com.
2. Supplemental Operating Budget
The Legislature has begun working on a Supplemental Operating Iudget, now dubbed the Early
Action Savings Bill. The House Ways & Means Committee heard the Supplemental Operating
Budget this past week, and passed it out of the committee. The bill needs to pass the Legislature
before February 4th in order to avoid future cuts. Even with the proposal, which is comprised
largely of cuts, there is a $260 million operating budget shortfall.
3. Legislative Agenda Items
Capital Budget Request.. Spokane Valley Partners Funding for Renovating the Food Bank
The Executive Director of Spokane Valley Partners is coining to Olympia this next week to
advocate for the funding request. GTH-GA has set up meetings for the Director to meet with the
legislative delegation.
Capital Budget Request. Land Acquisition for Park Road Pool
1201 Pacific Ave, Suite 2100 203 Maryland Ave.,NE
Tacoma, WA 98401 w\tiw.gthl,ov.cotu Washington, DC 20002
Phone: (253)620-6500 Phone: (202)544-2681
Fax: (253)620-6565 Fax: (202)544-5763
GTH-GA is completing the community project request form for the park We will submit this
form to the legislative delegation.
Port of Entry Legislation
This next week, Rep. Matt Shea, a representative from the Trucking Association, and GTH-GA
are meeting to discuss the port of entry legislation. The legislation will be dropped after this
discussion takes place.
Lain Enforcement District/Public Safety Authority Enabling Legislation
Both House Bill 1230 and Senate Bail[ 5155 will be heard this next week. These bills should spur
a lively discussion on the concept of allowing jurisdictions to create public safety authorities or
law enforcement districts. Spokane Valley will testify in support of the legislation.
Public Records Reform
There are a series of public records bills being heard in the Senate Government Operations
Committee. The bills are included on the schedule for next week attached to this report, as well
as described below.
1. SB 5049 - Implementing recommendations of the sunshine committee
The Sunshine Committee has proposed a series of exemptions (and eliminating
some exemptions) from the Public Records Act. These include: 1) Allow public
request access to background information of court appointed special advocates to
be released; 2) Exempt financial information that is give to agencies; 3) Allow for
public request access to information regarding underground petroleum storage
tanks, with some exceptions; 4) Amends an exemption regarding the Office of the
Insurance Commissioner; 5) Allow public request access to applications for
executive positions after the finalists for the position are selected; 6) Amends the
rideshare exemptions; 7) Amends attorney-client privilege statutes.
2. SB 5062 - Concerning providing agencies notice of a dispute under the public records
act and an opportunity to cure error in the production of public records.
When an individual is denied an opportunity to inspect or copy a public record
before filing an action in superior court, the requestor has the voluntary option
first to present a public records claim to the agency. Under SB 5062,
requirements for the contents of the public records claim and details of
communication are specified. (The House version is being heard on Thursday).
3. SB 5088 - Regarding the recovery of the costs of production and copying of public
records.
The Public Records Act requires that all state and local government agencies
make all public records available for public inspection and copying unless they
fall within certain statutory exemptions. If the time the agency takes to produce
the records exceeds five person-hours per month, the agency may require payment
for personnel costs to complete the search and make the copies. The personnel
costs cannot exceed the actual salary and benefit costs of the personnel required to
search, review, and copy the records. The requester must pay the fees before the
records are disclosed.
4. SB 5089 - Regarding conferences for public records requests disputes
If an individual files a court action contesting an agency's denial of a request or
contesting that the agency's estimate of the time it will take to respond to the
request is unreasonable, the requester and the agency may confer about the
dispute.
5. SB 5098 - Exempting personal information of minors in parks and recreation
programs from public inspection and copying.
Under SB 5098, the personal information of individuals under eighteen years of
age in a parks and recreation program is exempt from the public inspection and
copying under the Public Records Act.
GORDON THOMAS HONEYWELL
GOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS
Legislative Committee Schedule
From: Brialula Taylor
Week of January 24111-28th
The week of January 24-28 includes many work sessions. This schedule includes only those public hearings that
we may want to get involved in.
HIGHLIGHTED BILLS WITH HEARINGS
MONDAY
1. HB 1173 - Regarding small works roster contracting procedures.
Under current law, local governments may use the small public works roster process to award contracts.
The SWR process allows for a limited public works process for projects less than $35,000. The local
government gets a written quote from at least 3 contractors and then selects the lowest responsible
bidder. Under this limited public works process, the registered contractors must have annual revenue of
under$1 million. This legislation changes the maximum size of contracts that may be awarded under the
limited public works process from $35,000 to $50,000. However, for contracts in the $35,000-$50,000
range, the registered contractors can be any business with gross annual revenue under $7 million.
2. SB 5049 - Implementing recommendations of the sunshine committee
The Sunshine Committee has proposed a series of exemptions (and eliminating some exemptions) from
the Public Records Act. These include: 1) Allow public request access to background information of
court appointed special advocates to be released; 2) Exempt financial information that is give to
agencies; 3) Allow for public request access to information regarding underground petroleum storage
tanks, with some exceptions; 4) Amends an exemption regarding the Office of the Insurance
Commissioner; 5) Allow public request access to applications for executive positions after the finalists
for the position are selected; 6) Amends the rideshare exemptions; 7) Amends attorney-client privilege
statutes.
3. SB 5062 - Concerning providing agencies notice of a dispute under the public records act and an
opportunity to cure error in the production of public records.
When an individual is denied an opportunity to inspect or copy a public record before filing an action in
superior court, the requestor has the voluntary option first to present a public records claim to the
agency. Under SB 5062, requirements for the contents of the public records claim and details of
communication are specified. (The House version is being heard on Thursday).
4. SB 5088 - Regarding the recovery of the costs of production and copying of public records.
The Public Records Act requires that all state and local government agencies make all public records
available for public inspection and copying unless they fall within certain statutory exemptions. If the
time the agency takes to produce the records exceeds five person-hours per month, the agency may
require payment for personnel costs to complete the search and make the copies. The personnel costs
1201 Pacific Ave, Suite 2100 203 Maryland Ave.,NE
Tacoma, WA 98401 www.gth-Nv,com Washington, DC 20002
Phone: (253)620-6500 Phone: (202)544-2681
Fax (253)620-6565 Fax: (202) 544-5763
cannot exceed the actual salary and benefit costs of the personnel required to search, review, and copy
the records. The requester must pay the fees before the records are disclosed.
5. SB 5089 - Regarding conferences for public records requests disputes
If an individual files a court action contesting an agency's denial of a request or contesting that the
agency's estimate of the time it will take to respond to the request is unreasonable, the requester and the
agency may confer about the dispute.
6. SB 5098 - Exempting personal information of minors in parks and recreation programs from public
inspection and copying.
Under SB 5098, the personal information of individuals under eighteen years of age in a parks and
recreation program is exempt from the public inspection and copying under the Public Records Act.
TUESDAY
1. FIB 1223 -Authorizing use of hearing officers for street vacation hearings.
HB 1223 authorizes a legislative authority to appoint a hearing officer to conduct a public hearing to
take testimony and evidence relating to a proposed street vacation.
2. HB 1141 -Exempting local governments from alternative fuel vehicle requirements.
Under current law, local agencies are required to convert their fleets to biofuel and electric vehicles by
2015. This legislation removes the requirement.
3. SB 5051,- Concerning public notice of proposed settlements of environmental and public health
enforcement actions.
In any civil enforcement action involving an alleged or threatened violation of an environmental or
public health law related rules or permits, the state or local government enforcing agency or officer must
provide public notice of a proposed settlement at least 30 days before it may be approved by the court.
4. sIt :-)1 .5-., - Authorizing public safety atithorilied
Ibis legislation is discussion legislation to begin expl.corin , the concept (Si) public safer) authority. A!
ublic safety authority would function similarly to a regional fire protection itutltxaril y. (House bill bein4
lean! on Wednesdtiv)•
WEDNESDAY
11. 11B.1-.0t.I - Authorizing public safety attthoi•itics.1
--fihis legislation is discussion legislation to begin exploring the con .ept or public sttlety iuitliority. A
)ublic safety auiltoriiy would function similarly to a regional lime protection authority, (Senate b L being
ward on Tuescla)')1
THURSDAY
1. HB 1139 - Concerning providing agencies notice of a dispute under the public records act and an
opportunity to cure error in the production of public records.
When an individual is denied an opportunity to inspect or copy a public record before filing an action in
superior court, the requestor has the voluntary option first to present a public records claim to the
agency. Under SB 5062, requirements for the contents of the public records claim and details of
communication are specified. (The Senate version is being heard on Monday).
FRIDAY
There are no relevant hearings on Friday.
DETAILS & SCHEDULE
Monday, January 24, 2011
Community Development& Housing- 01/24/11 1:30 pm
Full Committee
House Hearing Rm C
John L. O'Brien Building
Olympia, WA
Work Session: Aerospace Cluster.
a. Overview of aerospace in Washington.
b. The current market outlook and competitive landscape for airplanes.
c. Successes, challenges, and recommendations.
Public Hearing:
1. 1113 117.3 - Regarding small works roster contracting procedures.
2. 1113 1308 - Increasing the flexibility for industrial development district levies for public port districts.
Government Operations, Tribal Relations & Elections" - 01/24/11 10:00 am
Full Committee ,Y.
Senate Hearing Rm 2 ,V ,
J.A. Cherberg Building
Olympia, WA
Public Hearing:
I . SB 5049 - Implementing recommendations of the sunshine committee.
2, Sl3 5062 - Concerning providing agencies notice of a dispute wider the public records act and an
opportunity to cure error in the production of public records,
3. SB 5088 - Regarding the recovery of the costs of production and copying of public records.
4. SB 5089 - Regarding conferences for public records requests disputes.
5. S13 5098 - Exempting personal information of minors in parks and recreation programs from public
inspection and copying.
Tuesday, January 25, 2011
Local Government - 01/25/11 10:00 am
Full Committee
House Hearing Rm E
John L. O'Brien Building
Olympia, WA
Public Hearing:
1. HB 1222 - Authorizing limited expansions of urban growth areas into one hundred year floodplains in I
areas adjacent to a freeway interchange or interstate in counties wholly or partially bordering salt
waters with more than one hundred thousand but fewer than one hundred fifty thousand residents.
2. 11i3 _223. - Authorizing use of hearing officers for street vacation hearings.
3. HB 1225 - Clarifying the method for calculating port commissioner compensation.
Technology, Energy & Communications* - 01/25/11 10:00 am
Full Committee
House Hearing Rm B
John L. O'Brien Building
Olympia, WA
REVISED on 1/21/2011 at 11:16 AM
Public Hearing:
1. HB 1122 - Regarding the authority of the department of information services' authority to provide
services to public agencies.
2. 1 Ell ! 1d 1 -Exempting local governments from alternative fuel vehicle requirements.
HB 1144 - Concerning renewable energy investment cost recovery program.
Environment, Water& Energy* - 01/25/11 10:00 am
Full Committee
Senate Hearing Rm 4
J,A. Cherberg Building
Olympia, WA
•
Work Session: Complying with federal air quality standards.
Public Hearing:
l 1. Reduci�ngpoi!utiom from wood stove, LZ-0069.7j„
2. SS 5051 - Concerning public notice of proposed settlements of environmental and public health
enforcement actions.
3. SB 5231 - Regarding the safety of certain children's products.
Government Operations, Tribal Relations & Elections - 01/25/11 1:30 pm
Full Committee
Senate Hearing Rm 2
J.A. Cherberg Building
Olympia, WA
Public Hearing:
1. SB 5116 - Concerning public health district authority as it relates to gifts, grants, conveyances,
bequests, and devises of real or personal property.
2. SB 5117 - Concerning the population restrictions for a geographic area to qualify as a rural public
hospital district.
3. SB 5133 - Using state correctional facility populations to determine population thresholds for certain
local government purposes.
4. SB 5143 - Addressing the annexation of unincorporated areas served by fire protection districts.
5. SB 5153 - Expanding provisions relating to candidates appearing on the general election ballot.
6. SIB 5155 - Authorizing public safety authorities.
Wednesday, January 26, 2011
Local Government' - 01/26/11 1:30 pm
Full Committee
House Hearing Rm E
John L. O'Brien Building
Olympia, WA
REVISED on 1/21/2011 at 1:49 PM
Public Hearing:
1. HB 1274 - Concerning the population restrictions for a geographic area to qualify as a rural public
hospital district.
2. HB 1280 - Concerning public health district authority as it relates to gifts, grants, conveyances,
bequests, and devises of real or personal property.
3. HB 1332 - Providing for the joint provision and management of municipal water, wastewater, storm
and flood water, and related utility services.
4. IIB !230 - Authorizing public safety authorities,
5. HB 1336 - Allowing the use of federal census data to determine the resident population of annexed
territory.
Thursday, January 27, 2011
State Government & Tribal Affairs* - 01/27/11 10:00 am
Full Committee
House Hearing Rm E
John L. O'Brien Building
Olympia, WA
REVISED on 1/20/2011 at 5:00 PM
Public Hearing:
1. HB 1092 - Providing for the election of members of the house of representatives from house districts
within each legislative district.
2, HB 1142 - Expanding provisions relating to candidates appearing on the general election ballot.
3. HB 1177 - Regarding field investigations on privately owned lands.
4. HB 1179 - Clarifying that public employees may attend informational or educational meetings
regarding legislative issues.
5. i-1[ 1 139 - ottceraii}g providing agencies notice oi- t dispute under the public records act and an
opportunity to cure error in the production of public records,
ka Valley--
PARTNER g
Mission Statement
Uniting the community by serving individuals and families through.
Providing basic life necessities—Teaching life skills that promote self reliance
Addressing emotional and psychological needs
Collaborating with other charitable and government agencies
Enriching the quality of community life
Spokane Valley Partners, formerly the Spokane Valley Community Center&Food Bank, serves
as the only comprehensive source of social services between the Spokane City Limits and the
Idaho border- SVP provides outreach and services to over 70,000 people.
"SVP continues to operate in a highly efficient manner, with a total administrative overhead of
less than 6%, and we continue to turn every dollar donated Into six dollars in services... an
outstanding return on these social investments."
-Ken Briggs, CEO
2009 Statistics In order to increase safety,the number of people served and
facility capacity, Spokane Valley Partners is seeking funding to
Food bank make necessary upgrades to the campus. One aspect of the
958 Families per month comprehensive upgrade is a fire suppression system,which will
11,498 Households served be installed in the warehouse, The fire suppression system will
1,163,631 pounds of food increase capacity in the warehouse, a storage facility used for
distributed food and other items that are distributed to those seeking the
Clothing Bank center's assistance.
8,015 Households
834 New Families Campus Upgrades include: restrooms, new front doors,
118,826 Pounds received instructional kitchen renovations, instructional classroom
Protective Payee
81 Households per month improvements, a new boiler,parking lot upgrades and a new
Emergency Assistance fire suppression system.
651 Households
339 New Households Project Costs:
$59,263 In Assistance
Have a Heart Valentines Fire Suppression System 540,000
287 Served Restrooms,front doors, kitchen, etc. $216,000
Backpacks and School Supplies Boiler Upgrade $99,000
878 Children helped Parking Lot Renovations $30,000
Coats 4 Kids
1,998 Coats given out
938 Scarves,hats and gloves
Season of Sharing Total Project Cost: 5385,000
1,368 Children helped
Volunteer Hours to Partners
27,119
2011 Legislative Session
Member Requested Local Community Project Information Form
Project Name: Legislative District: 4th
Spokane Valley Partners Facility Upgrades
Geographic Information System (GIS)
Address of Project Site: Coordinate:
10814 East Broadway Avenue Longitude: 117.15.39.26 West
Spokane Valley, WA 99206 Latitude: 47.95.50.06 North
Project Contact: Legislative Sponsor:
Name(s) Ken Briggs Rep. Crouse &Rep. Shea
Title: CEO
Organization: Spokane Valley Partners Fnnding Requested: $285,000
(Note: Funds are available on a
Phone: (509) 927-1153 Fax: (509) 928-8463 reimbursement basis only and cannot be
E-Mail: ceo @svpart.org advanced.)
Mailing Address:
P.O. Box 141360
Spokane Valley, WA 99214-1360
Project Information (attach separate page with additional details if available):
Provide a brief project summary, including the phase of the overall project, and the public benefit.
1) Describe the entire project and the phase of the overall project for which funds are requested:
This request will be used to repair and upgrade our 50 years old facility.
The major facility needs include:
• Resurface the parking lot $30,000 (Safety)
• Replace the facility boiler $100,000 (Health &Safety)
• Remodel the demonstration kitchen & classrooms, renovate the main floor restrooms, add a
small reception station, replace the main entry doors $215,000 (Enhanced ability to serve those
In need)
• Add a fire suppression system to the food warehouse $40,000 (Health, Safety and Capacity)
The total project cost is $385,000. Spokane Valley Partners is requesting$285,000 from the
Legislature and will raise the remaining$100,000 through foundation grants and community
support.
2) Public benefit of the project:
Owning a facility presents challenges for any non-profit, especially with a building that is 50 years old
and serves as many people as SVP does. Restrooms, kitchens and other infrastructure receive
considerable wear and tear. Our plans to improve the facility are always driven by concerns for the
health, safety, security and respect for those we serve.
NOTE: This form is to be submitted to Representative Dunshee for his consideration. He may elect to
submit this form for filing in the Capital Budget Committee records. If so filed, this form will become a
legislative record subject to public disclosure.
For over 20 years Spokane Valley Partners (SVP) has served as the sole source of comprehensive social
and emergency services for Eastern Spokane County. While comparable to a community center in the
scope of its work, SVP is a private, donor based non-profit and not an agency of any governmental
entity. SVP operates: the largest food bank in the county (serving over 1,000 families each month), a
free clothing bank, emergency services programs and several seasonal programs. And, as we are
philosophically resolute to increase the self-reliance of those we serve, all SVP programs have an
educational component e.g. cooking/nutrition, financial planning and life skills classes. SVP also serves
as the home campus for branch offices of SNAP and WIC as well as Hearth Homes, Theater Arts for
Children, ValleyFest and a family dental practice. This clustering of services allows for considerable
synergy and efficiency.
As a donor based organization, it is a challenge to fund capital projects without diverting critical dollars
from operations. SVP operates on a very lean budget, with administrative and fundraising costs less than
6%; and we are able to convert a $480,000 operational budget into $3,000,000 in services. This is done
through extensive use of volunteers (over 27,000 hours annually) and by leveraging substantial in-kind
contributions of food, clothing and restricted funds for utilities assistance,prescriptions and other
emergency services.
Start and Completion Dates: _ to
Attachments (Please enclose any materials that further describe the project and its financing.)
Eligible Project Type or Phase (Check all that apply to this funding request)
% of Request
Land acquisition
Demolition and site preparation
Design
New Construction
X Renovation 100 %
Other(describe)
100 % (should equal 100%)
What is the distance from the project to housing, restaurants, and entertainment?
Spokane Valley Partners is in a residential neighborhood. The nearest businesses are approximately
one quarter mile South on Sprague Avenue.
Does the project provide a new type of development to an existing neighborhood such as employment,
housing, educational, cultural, recreational, or services? Please describe.
This project will enhance the delivery of social and emergency services.
Does the project attempt to minimize the increase in vehicle miles traveled generated by the project?
Please explain?
There is no indication that this project will increase vehicle miles. By centralizing services, SVP is
able to minimize the number of sites our service recipients must travel to.
NOTE: This form is to be submitted to Representative Dunshee for his consideration. He may elect to
submit this form for filing in the Capital Budget Committee records. If so filed, this form will become a
legislative record subject to public disclosure,
Is the project located near existing or planned transit service?Please describe?
SVP is served by Spokane Transit Authority fixed routes and paratransit.
Does the project include preservation and re-use of at least 75% of an existing structure?
Yes
Will materials from demolition or construction waste materials be recycled?
Yes, to the greatest extent possible
Will energy conservation equipment, systems, or programs be used in the project?
The new boiler and associated heating systems upgrades will be high efficiency.
Will green building materials be used in constructing the project?
Yes, to the greatest extent possible.
Will the project use water conservation systems (metered water, graywater, re-use)?
N/A
Will the project include solar or other, non-traditional energy sources?
N/A
Will on-site natural features (wetlands, riparian corridors, watersheds, steep slopes, etc) be protected,
preserved, and/or restored in construction of the project or as part of the project, and will buffers around
on/off-site natural areas be created or maintained?
N/A
Yes No
Is this a joint project?
If yes, has a joint operating agreement been signed?
Is the site L owned, n optioned for purchase or n under a lease of 5 years or
more with renewal options?
Has the applicant initiated a capital fundraising campaign?
If yes, what percent of matching funds have been secured?
What other sources of matching funds ate available?
Has the project received previous state funding?
If yes, detail date,programs and amounts.
Has the project previously applied for and not received state funding?
If yes, detail dates, programs and amounts.
Is the project currently applying for or planning to apply for other sources of state
funding?
NOTE: This form is to be submitted to Representative Dunshee for his consideration. He may elect to
submit this form for filing in the Capital Budget Committee records. If so,filed, this form will become a
legislative record subject to public disclosure.
If yes, detail dates, programs and amounts.
If the project will not be completed after the requested state funding and matching funds are used,
describe: (1) what the project will be at the completion of the portion funded by this request and how
it will benefit the public; and (2) the phases and schedule for completion of the project.
What source(s) of non-state funds exist for completion of the project and its ongoing maintenance
and operation?
Spokane Valley Partners operations funding will be used for maintenance. SVP does not anticipate
an increase in on-going expense as a result of this project. There will actually be cost savings
(amount to be determined) with the introduction of higher efficiency boiler.
Organization Information Yes No
Is the requesting organization registered with the state as a non-profit organization? X
Is there a current or pending 501(c)(3) IRS registration? X
If answered no to either of the above, is applicant a local government?
Legislative Sponsor
(Signature) Date
Note: This is not a formal grant program. This form provides information for House members to request a separate
appropriation in the capital budget for this project. Funding any project is at the discretion of the Legislature. Successful past
projects generally are ones in which the requested state funds: (1)are used for a facility providing an important public
benefit; (2)are a small portion of the total project funding(25%or less);(3)result in a complctcd projcct or phase usable by
the public for the intended purpose when the state finds are expended; and(4)are for a project that is ready for construction
or renovation and will be completed within the biennium.
Please note that projects may be subject to state prevailing wage law(Chapter 39.12 RCW). Requesting organization are
encouraged to consult the Industrial Statistician(David Soma: 360-902-5330 or somd235 @ini..wa.gov)at the Washington
State Department of Labor Industries to determine whether prevailing wages must be paid. High-performance building
requirements(Chapter 39.35D RCW)may also apply.
NOTE: This form is to be submitted to Representative Dunshee for his consideration. He may elect to
submit this form for filing in the Capital Budget Committee records. If so filed, this form will become a
legislative record subject to public disclosure.
2009 Legislative Session
Member Requested Local Community Project Information Form
Project Name: Park Road Pool Park Legislative District: Fourth Legislative
District
Address of Project Site: N. 906 Park Road
Spokane Valley, WA 99206 Geographic Information System (GIS)
Coordinate:
N 47.664614 W 117.303311
Project Contact: Legislative Sponsor:
Name(s) Mike Jackson Representative Crouse
Title `: l ply= City Manager Representative Shea
Organization City of Spokane Valley
Phone: (509) 688-0194 Fax: Funding Requested: $300,000.00
(Note: Funds are available on a
E-Mail: mjackson @spokanevalley.org reimbursement basis only and cannot
Mailing Address: 11707 East Sprague Avenue, Suite 106 be advanced.)
Spokane Valley, WA 99206
Project Information (attach separate page with additional details if available):
Provide a brief project summary, including the phase of the overall project, and the public benefit.
1) Describe the entire project and the phase of the overall project for which funds are requested: Park
Road Pool Park Land Acquisition is located at the NE coiner of Park and Broadway Streets, directly
south of Park Road Pool and west of Centennial Middle School. Park Road Pool is a stand-alone facility
which offers the cornmunit a newl u•dated outdoor sool with slides ex.anded deck renovated
bathhouse, and plenty of parking; however, there is no park or green space at this location. The City of
Spokane Valley recently completed and adopted a Parks and Recreation Master Plan that was developed
on the basis of a city wide survey. The Plan identified the need for park property adjacent to Park Road
Pool.
2) Public benefit the project: Acquiring the land adjacent to Park Road Pool would preserve it to later
become a neighborhood park. In conjunction with the adjacent pool and school grounds, the area could
become a central point for the neighborhood and community.
Start and Completion Dates: January 1, 201109 to_December 31, 201 109
IAttachments (Please enclose any materials that further describe the project and its financing.)
Eligible Project Type or Phase (Check all that apply to this funding request)
% of Request
Land acquisition 100.0 %
Demolition and site preparation
Design
NOTE: This form is to be submitted to Representative Hans Dunshee for his consideration. He may
elect to submit this form for filing in the Capital Budget Committee records. If so filed, this form will
become a legislative record subject to public disclosure,
New Construction
Renovation •
Other(describe)
100.0 % (should equal 100%)
What is the distance from the project to housing, restaurants, and entertainment?
This property is immediately adjacent to the City owned Park Road Pool to the North. The property
is bordered on the East by Centennial Middle School. The area is surrounded by residential
neighborhoods.
Does the project provide a new type of development to an existing neighborhood such as employment,
housing, educational, cultural, recreational, or services? Please describe.
This project provides park land to an existing neighborhood. Eventually, it will add picnic and
playground activity to Park Road Pool. Currently, the pool is served only by a parking lot and there
is no surrounding green space for children and their parents to gather and relax or play. This project
is for the acquisition of property. Development of a neighborhood park will follow.
Does the project attempt to minimize the increase in vehicle miles traveled generated by the project?
Please explain?
This project hopes to extend visitor time to Park Road Pool by providing adjacent park facilities,
thus limiting vehicle miles to more distant park facilities. Park Road Pool is located in a residential
neighborhood and many of the park visitors currently walk to the site. Enhancement of the site will
result in additional pedestrian visitors.
Is the project located near existing or planned transit service? Please describe?
Yes. The project is served by Spokane Transit Authority bus service.
Does the project include preservation and rc-use of at least 75% of an existing structure?
This project site includes an old house that has been unoccupied for a number of years. The
condition of the house will be evaluated but it is unknown at this time if it is salvageable or if it
NOTE: This form is to be submitted to Representative Hans%rushee for his consideration. He may
elect to submit this form for filing in the Capital Budget Committee records. If so filed, this form will
become a legislative record subject to public disclosure.
would fit within the site plan for a neighborhood park.
Will materials from demolition or construction waste materials be recycled?
Yes. Salvage of the demolition materials will be a component of the demolition contract if the
house is demolished.
Will energy conservation equipment, systems, or programs be used in the project?
Yes. Currently this is an acquisition project only. Eventually, low energy lighting will be utilized at
the site. Energy use will be limited due to the passive nature of the park as a playground and picnic
area.
Will green building materials be used in constructing the project?
Yes. The City would maximize the use of green building materials for playground equipment, picnic
shelters, mulch and playground encroachment areas. Sprinkler systems will be low water use and
plant materials will be selected to conserve water.
Will the project use water conservation systems (metered water, graywater, re-use)?
Engineered sprinkler systems will include low usage heads, rain and soil sensors to conserve water.
Some areas will be planted with xeriscaping to conserve water and provide landscape
Will the project include solar or other, non-traditional energy sources?
This project will use minimal energy sources. Non-traditional security lighting will be investigated.
Will on-site natural features (wetlands, riparian corridors, watersheds, steep slopes, etc) be protected,
preserved, and/or restored in construction of the project or as part of the project,and will buffers around
on/off-site natural areas be created or maintained?
NOTE: This form is to be submitted to Representative Hans Dunshee for his consideration. He may
elect to submit this form for filing in the Capital Budget Committee records. If so fled, this form will
become a legislative record subject to public disclosure.
There are no wetlands, riparian corridors, etc. on this site.
Yes No
Is this a joint project? X
If yes, has a joint operating agreement been signed?
Is the site n owned, (< optioned for purchase or n under a lease of 5 years or
more with renewal options? X
X
Has the applicant initiated a capital fundraising campaign?
If yes, what percent of matching fiends have been secured?
What other sources of matching funds are available?
Has the project received previous state funding?
If yes, detail date,programs and amounts.
Has the project previously applied for and not received state funding?
If yes, detail dates, programs and amounts.
Is the project currently applying for or planning to apply for other sources of state
funding?
If yes, detail dates, programs and amounts.
If the project will not be completed after the requested state funding and matching funds are used,
describe: (1) what the project will be at the completion of the portion funded by this request and how
it will benefit the public; and(2) the phases and schedule for completion of the project.
The funds requested will complete 100% of acquisition of this critical property. Phase II would be
the development of a neighborhood park.
What source(s) of nonstate funds exist for completion of the project and its ongoing maintenance
and operation?
Ongoing maintenance and operations will be funded through City of Spokane Valley general
fund expenditures.
NOTE: This form is to be subnritted to Representative Hans Dunshee for his consideration. He may
elect to submit this form for filing in the Capital Budget Committee records. If so filed, this form will
become a legislative record subject to public disclosure.
Organization Information Yes No
Is the requesting organization registered with the state as a non-profit organization? X
Is there a current or pending 501(c)(3) IRS registration?
If answered no to either of the above, is applicant a local government?
Legislative Sponsor
(Signature) Date
Legislative Sponsor
(Signature) Date
Note: This is not a formal grant program, This form provides information for House members to request a separate
appropriation in the capital budget for this project. Funding any project is at the discretion of the Legislature. Successful past
projects generally are ones in which the requested state funds: (1)are used for a facility providing an important public
benefit;(2)are a small portion of the total project funding(25%or less);(3)result in a completed project or phase usable by
the public for the intended purpose when the state funds are expended; and(4)are for a project that is ready for construction
or renovation and will be completed within the biennium.
Please note that projects may be subject to state prevailing wage law(Chapter 39.12 RCW). Requesting organization are
encouraged to consult the Industrial Statistician(David Soma: 360-902-5330 or somd235 rr lni,wa.gov)at the Washington
State Department of Labor Industries to determine whether prevailing wages must be paid. High-performance building
requirements(Chapter 39.35D RCW)may also apply.
NOTE: This form is to he submitted to Representative Hans Dunshee for his consideration. He may
elect to submit this form for,filing in the Capital Budget Committee records. If so filed, this form will
become a legislative record subject to public disclosure.
Park Road Park
Land Acquisition
The City of Spokane Valley is requesting $300,000 in state funds for the acquisition of 2.11 acres of
property to eventually turn into a park.
The land is located at the NE corner of Park and Board way, directly south of Park Road Pool and west of
Centennial Middle School. Park Road pool is a stand-alone facility which offers the community a newly
updated outdoor pool with slides, expanded deck, renovated bathhouse, and plenty of parking;
however, there is no park or green space at this location. Acquiring this land would preserve it to later
become a neighborhood park. In conjunction with the adjacent pool and school grounds, the area could
become a central point for the neighborhood and community.
it
•
el
Pa . Road Pool ! A.
•
r
i + ' ��4
t.
i f Sip I. - , .
t
I
T Centennial Middle
School
E I ' ,1 1 A rs w -
• r 4-
_4104 ,
-
STOPPING AND INSPECTION. (1) Wherever by the laws of the State of Washington
any vehicle with a maximum gross weight or registered gross weight, or
operated at a gross weight of ten thousand (10, 000) pounds or more,
transporting livestock or placardable quantities of hazardous materials, is
used to transport any merchandise, product or commodity within the state,
within the state to without the SLaLe, or from without the state to within
the state, is hereby required to stop at such ports of entry or checking
stations established by the Washington State Department of Transportation and
submit to inspection, grading or weighing, for compliance with the laws of
the State of Washington.
(2) Wherever by the laws of the State of Washington any vehicle with a
maximum gross weight or registered gross weight, or operated at a gross
weight of twenty-six thousand (26, 000) pounds or more used to transport any
merchandise, product or commodity within the state, within the state to
without the state, or from without the state to within the state, is hereby
required to stop at such ports of entry or checking stations established by
the Washington State Department of Transportation and submit inspection,
grading or weighing, for compliance with the laws of the State of Washington.
(3) It shall be the duty of such owner or operator of every motor
vehicle or trailer to drive the motor vehicle or trailer upon any state owned
stationary or portable scale or private scale, certified by the state of
Washington when requested to do so by any peace officer, excepting fish and
game officers, or authorized emplcyees of the Washington State Department of
Transportation.
(4) Authorized employees of the transportation department may stop any
vehicle with a gross weight of ten thousand (10, 000) pounds or more by
displaying a flashing red light if the authorized employee has probable cause
to believe the vehicle bypassed a weighing or inspection station or proceeded
through the station without regard for the directional signals. Authorized
employees may direct a vehicle which has bypassed a weighing or inspection
station or has proceeded through the station without regard for the
directional signals, to return to the bypassed inspection or weighing station
and may issue a citation for failure to stop as required in this section. The
operator of a vehicle shall bring the vehicle to a stop, pulling off the
traveled portion of the highway when directed to do so by an authorized
employee of the transportation department by use of emergency lights or
siren.
PENALTIES. Any person failing to stop at any port of entry or checking
station when so required shall be guilty of a misdemeanor.
Michelle R. Rasmussen
—rom: Briahna Taylor[btaylor @gth-gov.com]
ant: Wednesday, December 15, 2010 6:37 AM
To: Brenda Grassel; Mike Jackson
Cc: Lee Reeves; Briahna Taylor
Subject: Port of Entry Issue
Councilmember Grassel & Mike Jackson—
It is my understanding that council has heard testimony from cattle ranchers and others on the port of entry issue.
Essentially, we are proposing legislation that would require all commercial trucks, including those that carry cattle,to go
through a port of entry. Right now, they are bypassing the port of entry and going through the city's streets. This adds
to the wear and tear on our streets, and the trucks are also circumventing inspections on the logs, etc. In researching
this issue, I discovered that there are a lot of questions/concerns. We would talk to one person and they would say one
thing... and then another person would say the exact opposite. Attached is a memo that describes what we heard from
the different groups we reached out to.
I spoke with Rep.Shea last week and he has agreed to sponsor legislation in the House on this issue. I imagine this will
be controversial legislation that may not pass this year. But, by introducing legislation we can get the issues/concerns
out there and perhaps get some more clarity than what I was able to accomplish through my research.
Between now and the lunch tomorrow, I will forward on a shortened version of the attached memo that we can present
to our legislative delegation. Please let me know if you have any questions on this issue.
-iahna
Briahrra Taylor
Governmental Affairs Consultant
Gordon Thomas Honeywell Governmental Affairs
Cell: (253)310-5477
E-mail: btay[ar @Rth-Rov.com
GORDON THOMAS HONEYWELL
COYt II rfNr4LAMURS
1
MEMORANDUM
To: Mike Jackson, City Manager
From: Briahna Taylor, Carly Golden
Date: December 8, 2010
RE:Research on Port of Entry Issues
Gordon Thomas Honeywell Governmental Affairs (GTH-GA) has researched the issue of the Port of Entry
at the Washington-Idaho border. The City of Spokane Valley expressed concerns that many commercial
trucks are circumventing the Port of Entry into Washington state, and utilizing smaller state routes and
city and county residential roads to rejoin Interstate 90 beyond the Port. GTH-GA spoke with several
entities involved in the issue.
Cattle Producers of Washington
The Cattle Producers of Washington have expressed interest in better regulating commercial cattle
trucks entering the state. While cattle trucks also utilize alternative routes through residential areas to
bypass the Port, the Cattle Producers of Washington express concern for human and animal health
because their loads are not regulated as a result of circumventing inspection possibilities at the Port.
GTH-GA spoke with Past President of the organization, Wade King. Mr. King said that their organization
already contacted Sen. Schoesler about possible legislation to regulate cattle truck traffic and that the
representative had agreed to potential sponsorship of a bill. Mr. King seemed to believe that a
legislative effort would be widely supported within the community as many citizens have complained
about the trucks carrying the mammals down residential streets from a quality of life standpoint.
GTH-GA contacted the Cattle Producers of Washington's lobbyist to begin coordinating a legislative
effort. The organization has not officially drafted legislation because there were concerns raised that
would make passing legislation unlikely. One of the reasons the Cattle Producers of Washington
indicated that it would be difficult to write a piece of legislation requiring all imported livestock to go
through the Port of Entry. If there were to be a mandatory Port of Entry law, It would apply to all
commercial trucks. The Cattle Producers of Washington expected quite a bit of push-back from the
trucking companies as truck's final destination may not be conveniently located via a route including the
Port of Entry (i.e. many trucks would be required to travel well out of their way). Additionally, the
current Port of Entry capacities could not effectively facilitate the increased volume in commercial truck
traffic. Despite these concerns, the Cattle Producers of Washington still feel that something needs to be
done.
Sgt. Eric Hanson, Commercial Motor Vehicle Division- Washington State Patrol
GTH-GA spoke with Sgt. Hanson with the Washington State Patrol, who indicated that enough regulation
exists, and that there isn't more that the State Patrol could'do because funding isn't available to create
larger Port of Entry capacity. He stated that signs directing trucks to the Port of Entry are located in
Idaho, so amendments or legislation could potentially require dealing with Idaho State Department of
Transportation, potentially creating a much larger issue than initially thought. Because proper signage
existed and it is not illegal for trucks to circumvent the Port of Entry, it is hard for WSP to regulate. They
may pull over trucks on suspicion of being overweight, or not having properly updated log books and
then re-direct them back to the Port of Entry, but they cannot punish them because no law exists stating
that what they are doing is illegal. Concerning the cattle industry, Sgt. Hanson stated that the United
States Department of Agriculture (USDA) is very heavily involved in regulating livestock entering the
country to ensure healthy animals.
Cpl. Bob Sola, Commercial Motor Vehicle Enforcement Officer,Spokane County Sherriff
Cpl.Sola stated that while the WSP does not believe this issue to be their"fight," but that someone has
to step up and address the issue. While the WSP may not have the funding to increase Port of Entry
capacity, the County does not have the money to replace deteriorating roads that already sustain a
higher volume of traffic than does the interstate. Cpl.Sola sees this issue as large and complex, but
completely in need of being addressed legislatively. He cited Washington State as an anomaly in the
country as most states, including Oregon and Idaho mandate trucks to go through Ports of Entry. In
those states if a truck is caught circumventing the Port of Entry the infraction Is considered a
misdemeanor. Cpl. Sola stated that commercial trucking is a regulated industry in and of itself and
therefore, the State of Washington needs to step up and do its part to regulate it,while at the same
time protecting infrastructure. If the State will not effectively regulate commercial trucking into the
state, the County will likely put weight limits on local roads and attach a $411 ticket to violations of the
limits. However, WSDOT has apparently met this effort with threats of rescinding portions of federal
funding to the county. Cpl. Sola believed that this threat has been met with much resistance, and
seemed to lack legitimate grounds indicating the unlikelihood of a withholding of funds. Cpl. Sola added
that he is in favor of additional alternatives if a statewide effort is impossible, including limiting
commercial trucking traffic to state route roads, which include some within the County that have been
improved to facilitate commercial traffic.
GTH-GA also researched laws concerning o nercial trucks and ports of entry in other states. It was
found that both Oregon and Idaho requi-tall ommercial trucks to go through their designated weigh
stations or ports of entry. In both stateskol ions of these regulations results in a misdemeanor and
hefty fines. in either case, it is the Departments of Transportation who regulates and enforces port of
entry enforcement. Based on statute documents, it appears that both state's regulations have been in
statute for at least 15 years.
Attached are the state statues outlining the rules for compliance subsequent penalties for non-
compliance.
Keith Metcalfe— WSDOT
Mr. Metcalf was not aware of any funding decrease to the county as a result of the county putting
weight limits on the roads. Though, he said he was not as familiar with the issue but was willing to do
research and contact us if anything of interest came up.
Idaho:
TITLE 40
HIGHWAYS AND BRIDGES
CHAPTER 5
IDAHO TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT
40-511.STOPPING AND INSPECTION. (1) Wherever by the Laws of the state of
Idaho any vehicle with a maximum gross weight or registered gross weight, or
operated at a gross weight of twenty-six thousand one (26, 00I) pounds or
more, excepting those transporting livestock or placardable quantities of
hazardous materials, is used to transport any merchandise, product or
commodity within the state, within the state to without the state, or from
without the state to within the state, the owner Or operator of either the
motor vehicle or trailer, as defined inchapter 1, title 4g, Idaho Code, used
to transport such merchandise, product or commodity is hereby requited to
stop at such ports of entry i r checking stations established by the Idaho
transportation department and submit to inspection, grading or weighing, for
compliance with the laws of the state of Idaho.
(2) Vehicles or combinations of vehicles with a maximum gross weight
of r.nn thousand (14, 000) pounds or more transporting livestock or placardable
quantities of hazardous materials are required to stop at all ports of entry
or checking stations established by the Idaho transportation department.
(3) It shall be the duty of such owner or operator of every motor
vehicle or trailer to drive the motor vehicle or trailer upon any state owned
stationary or portable scale or private scale, certified by the state of
Idaho when requested to do so by any peace officer, excepting fish and game
officers, or authorized employees of the Idaho transportation department.
(4) Authorized employees of the transportation department may stop any
vehicle with a maximum gross weight of eighteen thousand (18, 000) pounds or
more by displaying a flashing red light if the authorized employee has
probable cause to believe the vehicle bypassed a weighing or inspection
station or proceeded through the station without regard for the directional
signals. Authorized employees may direct a vehicle which has bypassed a
weighing or inspection station or has proceeded through the station without
regard for the directional signals, to return to the bypassed inspection or
weighing station and may issue a citation for failure to stop as required in
this section. The operator of a vehicle shall bring the vehicle to a stop,
pulling off the traveled portion of the highway when directed to do so by an
authorized employee of the transportation department by use of emergency
lights or siren.
TITLE 40
HIGHWAYS AND BRIDGES
CHAPTER 5
IDAHO TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT
40-512.PENALTIES. Any person failing to stop at any port of entry or checking
station when so required by the provisions of section 'k:u-511., Idaho Code, or,
failing to submit to the inspection, grading or weighing required by any law
of the state of Idaho, shall be guilty of a niHdeneanor.
Oregon:
ENFORCEMENT
818.400 Failure to comply with commercial vehicle enforcement
requirements; penalty. (1) A person commits the offense of failure to
comply with commercial vehicle enforcement requirements if the person
is driving a vehicle or combination of vehicles and the person does
not comply with any of the following or if the person is the owner of
a vehicle or combination of vehicles and the person causes or permits
the vehicle or combination not to comply with any of the following:
(a) A vehicle or combination of vehicles must stop and submit to
any enforcement of commercial vehicle weight, size, load, conformation
or equipment regulation when directed to do so by an "OPEN" sign
displayed at a permanently established truck scale .
(b) A vehicle or combination of vehicles must stop and submit to
any enforcement of commercial vehicle weight, size, load, conformation
or equipment regulation when directed to do so by any sign or signal
displayed or given by a police officer, motor carrier enforcement
officer or weighmaster acting in accordance with authority granted
under ORS 810 . 490 .
(c) A vehicle or combination of vehicles must move into the
right lane for purposes of a weight or size check when instructed to
do so by a sign indicating the presence of a weigh-in-motion scale.
(d) The directions of any police officer, motor carrier
enforcement officer or weighmaster that are given in accordance with
authority granted under ORS 810 . 490 or 810 .530 must be complied with.
(2) The requirement of subsection (1) (a) of this section does
not apply to:
(a) An empty combination of a log truck and pole trailer if the
pole trailer is bunked on the log truck and there is no other load; or
(b) A vehicle or combination of vehicles if:
(A) The normal route of the vehicle or combination of vehicles
requires turning off the highway after passing the "OPEN" sign but
before reaching the scale; and
(B) The vehicle or combination of vehicles is en route to a
terminal or other legitimate business .
(3) Operation of any vehicle or combination of vehicles in
violation of this section is prima facie evidence that the owner of
such vehicle or combination caused or permitted it to be so operated
and the owner shall be liable for any penalties imposed under this
section .
{4) The offense described in this section, failure to comply
with commercial vehicle enforcement requirements, is a Class B
misdemeanor. The penalty provided under this subsection is in addition
to any penalty provided for violation of any prohibition relating to
vehicle weight, size, load, conformation, or equipment. [1983 c. 338
§533; 1985 c. 393 §35; 1987 c.897 §2; 1993 c. 741 §101; 1995 c.27 §1;
1995 c. 101 §1; 1997 c. 722 §6]
is. Mr. Koudelka explained it is a laptop computer designed for heavy impact of cars,jarring and general
abuse from being in a car. He said his understanding is that it they are portable and not mounted in the
cars, Mayor Towey invited public comment; no comments offered. Vote by Acclamation: In Favor.
Unanimous. Opposed:None. Abstentions:None. Motion passed
PUBLIC COMMENTS:, Mayor Toomey invited general public comments.
Carlos Landa, 12019 E. Sprague Ave.: He said during Council discussion Councilmember Grafos made
specific comments directed at him and he wishes to address those comments. He said the last Council put
the issue of the couplet and the one-way streets to bed and they were in a position to start changing
Sprague back from University to Argonne soon. He said that to say now that you are trying to"put this to
bed," he would submit that we have dug up a body that was already cold and you are trying to revitalize
it. He then said Councilmember Gothmann stated that the public pays very little for road projects because
most of these are T1B projects funded with federal and state dollars. He said Councilmember Grafos
stated that in the instance of the Sullivan corridor only a few thousand dollars was actually City money,
so the idea that he is saying the citizens have a right to vote because the citizens are paying for it is an
extremely misleading statement.
Cathey Bonin, 2803 S. Bowdish: Spoke regarding the lighting at Bowdish Middle School. She said in the
winter it gets dark at four or five in afternoon and the lighting along Bowdish is very poor and you cannot
see children walking. She asked that we check the lighting to make it safer for kids.
Shirley Rademacher, 19303 E. River Rock Lane: Spoke concerning the heavy commercial truck traffic on
Barker road. She said she is concerned with the cattle trucks that come from Canada that she said are
overweight and illegally taking back-roads. She said that Liberty Lake is also fighting this battle and that
trucks belong on interstates and need weighed and inspected. She said Barker Road has bike lanes now
and the trucks take up most of the road. She suggested placing signs after Euclid expressing no trucks
over 10,000 gross vehicle weight to keep the trucks out of the neighborhoods filled with children.
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS:
8. Cattlemen of Spokane County .. Cindy Marshall
Cindy Marshall from Otis Orchards discussed her concerns over the Canadian cattle trucks that use
Harvard Rd. She said this affects the safety of our communities and has an impact on the infrastructure of
the secondary roads the cattle trucks are taking. She said the trucks are bypassing the port of entry by
taking Trent, which is legal in Washington. She said she will work on legislation this year to encourage
trucks to go through the port of entry. She introduced Corporal Bob Sola of the Spokane County
Sherriff's office and Willard Wolf who is a member of the Cattleman's Association. Cpl. Sola said there
are no laws in Washington regulating that trucks use the ports of entry, which creates a strenuous
obligation for law enforcement and puts a strain on our resources, He said 40-70 cattle trucks come in
through Canada and travel through Spokane Valley per day, depending on the time of year. He said the
County is considering restricting Harvard Rd. to a strict truck weight that would move trucks to Sullivan,
Barker, and Argonne Roads. Mr. Wolf said the trucks are four-axel trucks and they are illegal in 44 states
for interstate travel, but they are legal in Idaho, Washington and Montana. He said they tear up the roads
and come with 110,000 pound payload. He said the legal limit in Washington is 105,500 pounds.. He said
they also pose a health issue because FMD (foot and mouth disease) gets into cattle, swine, sheep, goats,
deer, and elk and there are no assurances as to where the cattle from Canada originally came from or what
has spread because they have not gone through a port of entry. He said there are other diseases to be
concerned with such as tuberculosis, brucellosis, and Red Water. He said they want enforcement to put
the trucks on the interstates and signage to direct them to use the ports of entry. Acting City Manager
Jackson said if Council chooses our City Attorneys can look at the jurisdiction the City has over this item
and could come back to Council with a range of options for consideration.
Council Regular Meeting 6-29-2010 Page 8 of 11
Approved by Council:07-27-2010
Deputy Mayor Schimmels moved, seconded, and it was unanimously agreed to extend the tweeting one
hour:
Councihnember Dempsey asked since they know the time the trucks are coming through, why are they
not using the portable scales to weigh them. Cpl. Sola said there are only two officers to enforce the
weight limits and one was deployed a couple months ago. If they try to intercept them at the state line on
Trent, they have to pull over onto a small shoulder and weighing a cattle truck is not easy to do. He said
they put themselves at risk due to the small shoulder and speeding traffic. He said they are inclined not to
use the portable scales as much, but rather to do emphasis details. Councilmember Dempsey asked if we
could post signs in Idaho for the Washington Port of Entry. Cpl. Sola said they have signs there currently,
but they are unenforceable. He said they have gone to the state and the Dept. of Transportation and asked
for help. Councilmember Dempsey said we cannot enforce trucks on state highways and Trent and Pines
are both highways. Cpl. Sola said it is a regional problem that needs addressing. Councilmember
Gothmanin suggested they talk to our lobbyist and ask her to check into this, then bring it up for
discussion at the first half of the legislative session. He said they could also ask our local representative,
Matt Shea, and then go from there. Mayor Towey asked staff to look at the three options mentioned by
Mr. Jackson and Councilmember Gothmann and to bring this back to Council at a future meeting.
9. Pavement Requirements—Kathy McClung
Community Development Director McClung reported on the issue of a citizen request not to have paving
for his business lot. She explained that having pavement requirements protect the aquifer, abide by the
regional plan to protect air quality, and are a requirement of the County code that carried forward to the
City code. She said to change the code would require a Comprehensive Plan amendment because it is
stated in the Comprehensive Plan that pavement is required. Councilmember Dempsey said that to
require lots be paved is the responsible thing to do to ensure nothing is going into the aquifer or
contaminating the air quality. Councilmember Grassel asked how many acres of land in Spokane Valley
is either gravel or unpaved. Ms. McClung said she does not have that information and she is not sure she
can get it. She said there are a number of gravel lots and she assumes they occurred prior to the County
adopting the regulations. Councilmember Grasse] said that according to the Clean Air Act, it looks like
gravel surfaces are fine for lots and her concern is there are many unpaved vacant lots and paving is
expensive. She said she would like to Iook into another option because paving could be cost prohibitive
and we could end up with several vacant lots with gravel because people could not afford to pave it.
Councilmember Dempsey said the value of the health of our citizens and the health of our aquifer is more
important. Councilmember Grafos asked if we could encourage businesses by bonding the pavement for a
limited number of years for a new business. He said they could require the business to perform a certain
percentage of that paving or the landscaping requirements up front, but give time to complete it and still
encourage businesses to move into our area, Deputy Mayor Schimmels said the City spends money every
year to pave some of our gravel roadways and he asked Mr. Worley how much we paved last year due to
pollutants. Mr. Worley said he does not have those specific numbers but whenever the County does a
sewer project the City has taken the position that we will replace the gravel roads for air quality purposes.
Councilmember Dempsey asked if there is consensus to proceed with a change to the Comprehensive
Plan. Mayor Towey noted there is not a consensus of Council to move forward.
10. Ballot Measure—Mike Jackson
Acting City Manager Jackson said this item is to discuss the potential ballot measure for conversion of
one-way to two-way on Sprague Avenue. He said the cost to place a ballot measure on the November
ballot would be approximately $10,000.00 - $15,000.00, which will vary depending on the number of
items on that particular ballot. He said that to place it on a special ballot with no other ballot measure
would cost approximately $100,000.00. The deadline to file a resolution for the November 2nd general
election ballot is August 10th and the deadline to file a resolution for the February 8, 2011 election is
December 25, 2010: He said this is achievable. He said Public Works is concerned with the figures we
have for conversion because the numbers we have are planning level numbers. Currently they are working
Council Regular Meeting 6-29-2010 Page 9 of 11
Approved by Council:07-27-2010
HB 1230 - 2011-12 Page 1 of 1
;• x-lei WASHINGTON STATE LE I r r �h x t
I-''■: ugtttl hMI 1...;,.: I •1. I (.1 I4%:!i.i. 'ch Help
Bill Information > HB 1230-2011-12
Inside the Legislature
A Find Your Legislator
'A Visiting the Legislature Search by Bill Number
-k Agendas, Schedules and
Calendars 1230 1 Search
- Bill Information Search the full text_QL a bill
* Laws and Agency Rules — -- - — —
Legislative Committees
HB 1230 - 2011-12 (What is this?)
* Legislative Agencies
* Legislative Information Authorizing public safety authorities.
Center
* E-mail Notifications Go to documents...
(Listserv)
* Civic Education
-* History of the State History of Bill
Legislature as of Monday, January 31, 2011 2:24 PM
Outside the Legislature Sponsors: Representatives Hudgins, Ormsby, Springer, Cody,
k Congress-the Other Fitzgibbon, Kenney
Washington Companion Bill: SB 5155
TVW
Washington Courts 2011 REGULAR SESSION
•k OFM Fiscal Note Website
Jan 17 First reading, referred to Local Government. (View original Bill)
Access Jan 26 Public hearing in the House Committee on Local
.AWashington4. g
Government at 1:30 PM. (Committee Materials)
Go to history...
Available Documents
Bill Documents Bill Digests Bill Reports
Original Bill Bill Digest House Bill Analysis 2011
Fiscal Note (Available)
Get Fiscal Note
http://apps.leg.wa.gov/billinfo/suminary.aspx?bill=1230&year=2011 1/31/2011
Michelle R. Rasmussen
—
From: Mike Jackson
Sent: Monday, January 31, 2011 1:52 PM
To: Michelle R. Rasmussen
Subject: FW: Public Safety Authority/Law Enforcement District
From: Briahna Taylor ;maiFto:btaylari:gtii_q: v.comi
Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2011 10:45 PM
To: Mike Jackson
Subject: Public Safety Authority/Law Enforcement District
Mike–
The legislation regarding the public safety authority or law enforcement district is up for a hearing. I think the City
should have a presence at the hearing because it is on our legislative agenda, and we want the conversation around the
public safety authority to move forward.
Either I can testify on behalf of the City, or you and/or a councilmember could travel to Olympia to testify.
The following day (the 27th), the Executive Director from the Spokane Valley food bank will be In town to meet with the
legislative delegation to discuss the capital budget request. If you or someone else did travel to Olympia,they might
consider making a two-day trip and joining the meetings about the food bank request–although this is not a necessity.
Please let me know which you would prefer–either work.
Thanks]
Briahna
Local Government
1/26/11 1:30 pm
House Full Committee
House Hearing Rm E
John L. O'Brien Building
Olympia,WA
Public Hearing:
1. HB 123;;-Authorizing public safety authorities.
1
Washington State BILL
House of Representatives
ANALYSIS
Office of Program Research
Local Government Committee
HB 1230
Brief Description: Authorizing public safety authorities.
Sponsors: Representatives Hudgins, Ormsby, Springer, Cody, Fitzgibbon and Kerney.
Brief Summary of Bill
• Allows for the creation of a regional public safety authority by one or more
participating cities, towns,port districts and tribes.
• Authorizes the transfer of powers, duties and functions relating to public safety from
participating jurisdictions to the new authority.
• Provides revenue sources, including ad valorem property taxes, benefit charges, and
the power to incur indebtedness, to the new authority.
Hearing Date: 1/26/11
Staff: Heather Emery (786-7136).
Background:
Public Safety in Cities and Towns, Ports Districts, and Tribal Jurisdictions.
Although the Washington Constitution authorizes cities and towns to exercise such police powers
as do not conflict with general law, state law provides few specifics as to what or how police
services should be delivered. A city or town may establish a municipal police department under
the direction of a locally appointed police chief or marshal, or it may enter into a contractual
arrangement with another jurisdiction to provide law enforcement services. In that case, the
level of service and cost is negotiated between the jurisdictions.
A port district that operates an airport or that is designated a port of entry by the federal
government is authorized to appoint police officers with full police powers, if the officers have
successfully graduated from a recognized professional police academy or training institution.
This analysis was prepared by non-parlisari legislative stcfffor• the use of legislative
members in their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it
constitute a statement of legislative intent.
House Bill Analysis - 1 - HB 1230
Similarly, tribal police officers that meet certain training and liability requirements may exercise
the full powers of a general authority Washington peace officer.
Opportunities for Cooperation.
Two separate statutes authorize public safety agencies to cooperate with each other. The
Interlocal Cooperation Act and the Washington Mutual Aid Peace Officers Powers Act authorize
a law enforcement agency to contract with any other law enforcement agency to provide mutual
law enforcement assistance, particularly in emergency situations. Neither act,however, relieves
an individual public safety agency of its public safety-related obligations and responsibilities or
provides any additional taxing authority to cooperating agencies.
Summary of Bill:
One or more adjacent public safety jurisdictions, or any single jurisdiction, may form a regional
public safety authority (RPSA, or authority) imbued with all powers, duties, and functions of a
participating jurisdiction pertaining to police services. For purposes of this bill, a "public safety
jurisdiction" is a city, town, port district, or tribe.
Creation of a Public Safety Authority.
To create an RPSA, three elected officials appointed by the governing body of each participating
jurisdiction (or, if a single jurisdiction is forming an RPSA, the entire policy-making body of that
jurisdiction) must first form a planning committee to adopt an RPSA plan (plan). Among other
requirements, the plan must recommend design, financing, and development of police service
facilities and operations, and it must recommend sources of revenue and a financing plan to fund
selected police services and projects. Sources of revenue may include benefit charges, property
taxes, or both.
Once adopted, the plan must be forwarded to the participating jurisdictions' governing bodies to
initiate the election process. Voters may approve or reject a single ballot measure that approves
both the formation of the RPSA and the plan. The required margin for voter approval depends
on the revenue sources proposed by the plan. If the plan authorizes the RPSA to impose benefit
charges or 60 percent voter-approved taxes, the plan and the creation of the authority must be
approved by 60 percent of the voters. If the plan does not authorize benefit charges or 60 percent
voter-approved taxes, the plan and the creation of the authority must be approved by a simple
majority.
Governance and Operations.
If the voters approve the creation of an RPSA and the plan, the RPSA is created as of the next
January l st or July l st, whichever comes first. An RPSA is governed by a board consisting
solely of elected officials. The board is responsible for the execution of the voter-approved plan
and has broad authority over governance and operational matters.
Except as otherwise provided in the plan, the following are transferred to the RPSA on its
creation date:
House Bill Analysis - 2 - HB 1230
• all powers, duties, and functions of a participating jurisdiction pertaining to police
services;
• all written material of a participating jurisdiction pertaining to police services;
• all real,personal, and tangible property employed by the participating jurisdiction in
carrying out police services; and
• all funds, credits, and other assets held by the participating jurisdiction in connection with
police services.
Additionally, except as provided otherwise in the plan, any appropriations made to a
participating jurisdiction for carrying out police services are transferred and credited to the
RPS A.
Also, as of the date of an RPSA's creation, all police employees of a participating jurisdiction are
transferred to the public safety authority. A transferred employee is entitled to the same rights,
benefits, and privileges he enjoyed while employed by the participating jurisdiction. Collective
bargaining agreements remain effective, and if any or all of the participating jurisdictions
provide for civil service in their police departments, the collective bargaining representatives of
the transferring employees and the participating jurisdictions must negotiate regarding the
establishment of a civil service system within the RPSA.
Withdrawal, Reannexation and Annexation.
An RPSA may withdraw areas from its boundaries if its board adopts a resolution approving
withdrawal and finding that inclusion of the jurisdiction in the authority will adversely affect the
jurisdiction's regular property tax levy, or if the governing body of a jurisdiction within which
the area is located adopts a resolution approving the withdrawal. Reannexation is authorized if
the board and the governing body of the jurisdiction within which the area to be annexed is
located adopt a resolution proposing reannexation.. Rearumexation is subject to a referendum
vote.
Territory that is annexed by a participating jurisdiction is annexed to the RPSA as of the date of
the annexation. This bill provides an RPSA with no independent annexation authority.
Revenue and Financing.
As authorized by the plan and approved by the voters, a board may annually levy three separate
taxes on all taxable property located within the authority, with each tax not to exceed 50 cents
per $1,000 of assessed value. Levies in excess of this amount or in excess of existing aggregate
dollar limitations must be approved by 60 percent of the voters.
Additionally, as authorized by the plan and approved by the voters, a board may adopt a
resolution to impose a benefit charge on personal property and improvements to real property
that have or will receive benefits provided by the RPSA. Imposition of a benefit charge is
effective only if a 60 percent majority of the voters approves a proposition to impose it, and the
charge expires in ten years or fewer, unless subsequently reapproved by the voters. A board must
annually hold a hearing to review and establish the benefit charges for the subsequent year.
House Bill Analysis - 3 - HB 1230
For its purposes, an RPSA may incur general indebtedness and issue its own bonds, which,
together with any nonvoter-approved general obligation debt, may not exceed three-quarters of 1
percent of the value of the taxable property located within the authority. With 60 percent voter
approval and for capital purposes, an RPSA may also issue general obligation bonds, maturing in
not more than 25 years, to be paid by voter-approved excess property tax levies. These bonds,
together with any general obligation debt, may not exceed 1.5 percent of the value of taxable
property located within the authority.
Appropriations: None.
Fiscal Note: Available.
Effective Date: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of the session in which the bill is
passed.
House Bill Analysis - 4 - HB 1230
H-0438 . 3
HOUSE BILL 1230
State of Washington 62nd Legislature 2011 Regular Session
By Representatives Hudgins, Ormsby, Springer, Cody, Fitzgibbon, and
Kenney
Read first time 01/17/11 . Referred to Committee on Local Government .
1 AN ACT Relating to regional public safety authorities; amending
2 RCW 57 . 90 . 010, 84 . 09 . 030, 84 . 52 . 010, and 84 . 52 . 052; adding a new
3 section to chapter 84 . 52 RCW; and adding a new chapter to Title 35 RCW.
4 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:
5 NEW SECTION. Sec. 1 . FINDINGS . The legislature finds that :
6 (1 ) The ability to respond to emergency situations by many of
7 Washington state ' s police and sheriff jurisdictions has not kept up
8 with the state ' s needs, particularly in urban regions;
9 (2) Providing a public safety system requires a shared partnership
10 and responsibility among the federal , state, local, and regional
11 governments and the private sector;
12 (3) There are efficiencies to be gained by regional public safety
13 service delivery while retaining local control ; and
14 (4 ) Timely development of significant projects can best be achieved
15 through enhanced funding options for regional public safety service
16 agencies, using already existing taxing authority to address police
17 service needs and new authority to address critical police projects and
18 services .
p. 1 HB 1230
1 NEW SECTION. Sec. 2 . DEFINITIONS. The definitions in this
2 section apply throughout this chapter unless the context clearly
3 requires otherwise .
4 ( 1) "Board" means the governing body of a regional public safety
5 authority.
6 (2 ) "Regional public safety authority" or "authority" means a
7 municipal corporation, an independent taxing authority within the
8 meaning of Article VII, section 1 of the state Constitution, and a
9 taxing district within the meaning of Article VII, section 2 of the
10 state Constitution, that has been created by a vote of the people under
11 this chapter to implement a regional public safety authority plan. The
12 district may include more than one city, town, port district, or Indian
13 tribe, if the legislative authority of each participating jurisdiction
14 has agreed to the inclusion as provided in an interlocal agreement
15 adopted pursuant to chapter 39 . 34 RCW.
16 (3) "Regional public safety authority planning committee" or
17 "planning committee" means the advisory committee created under section
18 3 of this act to create and propose to jurisdictions a regional public
19 safety authority plan to design, finance, and develop police service
20 projects .
21 (4 ) "Regional public safety authority plan" or "plan" means a plan
22 to develop and finance a public safety authority project or projects,
23 including, but not limited to, specific capital projects, police
24 service operations pursuant to section 4 (3) (b) of this act, and
25 preservation and maintenance of existing or future facilities .
26 (5) "Public safety jurisdiction" means a city, town, port district,
27 or Indian tribe .
28 (6) "Regular property taxes" has the same meaning as in RCW
29 84 . 04 . 14.0 .
30 NEW SECTION . Sec. 3 . PLANNING COMMITTEE--FORMATION--POWERS .
31 Regional public safety authority planning committees are advisory
32 entities that are created, convened, and empowered as follows :
33 (1) Any two or more adjacent public safety jurisdictions, or any
34 single jurisdiction wishing to create such a public safety authority,
35 may create a regional public safety authority and convene a regional
36 public safety authority planning committee . No public safety
37 jurisdiction may participate in more than one authority.
HB 1230 p. 2
1 (2) Each governing body of the public safety jurisdictions
2 participating in planning under this chapter shall appoint three
3 elected officials to the authority planning committee . In the case
4 where a single agency wishes to create a public safety authority, the
5 entire council, board, or other policy-making body shall serve as the
6 planning authority. Individuals participating in planning under this
7 chapter may be reimbursed for travel and incidental expenses at the
8 discretion of their respective governing body .
9 (3) The planning committee shall conduct its affairs and formulate
10 a regional public safety authority plan as provided under section 4 of
11 this act .
12 (4) At its first meeting, a regional public safety authority
13 planning committee may elect officers and provide for the adoption of
14 rules and other operating procedures .
15 (5) The planning committee may dissolve itself at any time by a
16 majority vote of the total membership of the planning committee . Any
17 participating public safety jurisdiction may withdraw upon thirty
18 calendar days ' written notice to the other jurisdictions .
19 NEW SECTION . Sec. 4 . PLANNING COMMITTEE--FORMULATION OF SERVICE
20 PLAN . (1) A regional public safety authority planning committee shall
21 adopt a regional public safety authority plan providing for the design,
22 financing, and development of police services . The planning committee
23 may consider the following factors in formulating its plan:
24 (a) Land use planning criteria; and
25 (b) The input of cities and counties located within, or partially
26 within, a participating public safety jurisdiction.
27 (2) The planning committee may coordinate its activities with
28 neighboring cities, towns, and other local governments that engage in
29 public safety planning.
30 (3) The planning committee shall :
31 (a) Create opportunities for public input in the development of the
32 plan;
33 (b) Adopt a plan proposing the creation of a regional public safety
34 authority and recommending design, financing, and development of police
35 service facilities and operations, including maintenance and
36 preservation of facilities or systems; and
p. 3 HB 1230
1 (c) In the plan, recommend sources of revenue authorized by section
2 5 of this act, identify the portions of the plan that may be amended by
3 the board of the authority without voter approval, consistent with
4 section 5 of this act, and recommend a financing plan to fund selected
5 police services and projects .
6 (4 ) Once adopted, the plan must be forwarded to the participating
7 public safety jurisdictions ' governing bodies to initiate the election
8 process under section 6 of this act .
9 (5) If the ballot measure is not approved, the planning committee
10 may redefine the selected regional public safety authority projects,
11 financing plan, and the ballot measure . The public safety
12 jurisdictions ' governing bodies may approve the new plan and ballot
13 measure, and may then submit the revised proposition to the voters at
14 a subsequent election or a special election . If a ballot measure is
15 not approved by the voters by the third vote, the planning committee is
16 dissolved.
17 NEW SECTION . Sec. 5 . SERVICE PLAN--TAXES AND BENEFIT CHARGES .
18 (1) A regional public safety authority planning committee may, as part
19 of a regional public safety authority plan, recommend the imposition of
20 some or all of the following revenue sources, which a regional public
21 safety authority may impose upon approval of the voters as provided in
22 this chapter :
23 (a) Benefit charges under sections 16 through 25 of this act;
24 (b) Property taxes under sections 13 through 15 of this act and RCW
25 84 . 52 . 044 , 84 . 09 . 030, 84 . 52 . 010, 84 . 52 . 052, and 84 . 52 . 069; or
26 (c) Both (a) and (b) of this subsection .
27 (2) The authority may impose taxes and benefit charges as set forth
28 in the regional public safety authority plan upon creation of the
29 authority, or as provided for in this chapter after creation of the
30 authority. If the plan authorizes the authority to impose benefit
31 charges or sixty percent voter approved taxes, the plan and creation of
32 the authority must be approved by an affirmative vote of sixty percent
33 of the voters within the boundaries of the authority voting on a ballot
34 proposition as set forth in section 6 of this act . However, if the
35 plan provides for alternative sources of revenue that become effective
36 if the plan and creation of the authority is approved only by a
37 majority vote, then the plan with alternative sources of revenue and
HB 1230 p. 4
1 creation of the authority may be approved by an affirmative vote of the
2 majority of those voters . If the plan does not authorize the authority
3 to impose benefit charges or sixty percent voter approved taxes, the
4 plan and creation of the authority must be approved by an affirmative
5 vote of the majority of the voters within the boundaries of the
6 authority voting on a ballot proposition as set forth in section 6 of
7 this act . Except as provided in this section, all other voter approval
8 requirements under law for the levying of property taxes or the
9 imposition of benefit charges apply. Revenues from these taxes and
10 benefit charges may be used only to implement the plan as set forth in
11 this chapter.
12 NEW SECTION. Sec . 6 . SERVICE PLAN--SUBMISSION TO VOTERS . The
13 governing body or bodies of one or more public safety jurisdictions,
19 upon receipt of the regional public safety authority plan under section
15 4 of this act, may certify the plan to the ballot, including
16 identification of the revenue options specified to fund the plan. The
17 governing bodies of the public safety jurisdictions may draft a ballot
18 title, give notice as required by law for ballot measures, and perform
19 other duties as required to put the plan before the voters of the
20 proposed authority for their approval or rejection as a single ballot
21 measure that both approves formation of the authority and approves the
22 plan. Authorities may negotiate interlocal agreements necessary to
23 implement the plan . The electorate is the voters voting within the
24 boundaries of the proposed regional public safety authority. A simple
25 majority of the total persons voting on the single ballot measure to
26 approve the plan and establish the authority is required for approval .
27 However, if the plan authorizes the authority to impose benefit charges
28 or sixty percent voter approved taxes, then the percentage of total
29 persons voting on the single ballot measure to approve the plan and
30 establish the authority is the same as in section 5 of this act . The
31 authority must act in accordance with the general election laws of the
32 state . The authority is liable for its proportionate share of the
33 costs when the elections are held under RCW 29A. 04 . 321 and 29A. 04 . 330.
34 NEW SECTION . Sec . 7 . PUBLIC SAFETY AUTHORITY--FORMATION--
35 CHALLENGES . If the voters approve the plan, including creation of a
36 regional public safety authority and imposition of taxes and benefit
p. 5 HB 1230
1 charges, if any, the authority is formed on the next January 1st or
2 July 1st, whichever occurs first . The appropriate county election
3 officials shall, within fifteen days of the final certification of the
4 election results, publish a notice in a newspaper or newspapers of
5 general circulation in the authority declaring the authority formed.
6 A party challenging the procedure or the formation of a voter-approved
7 authority must file the challenge in writing by serving the prosecuting
8 attorney of each county within, or partially within, the regional
9 public safety authority and the attorney general within thirty days
10 after the final certification of the election . Failure to challenge
11 within that time forever bars further challenge of the authority' s
12 valid formation.
13 NEW SECTION. Sec. 8 . ORGANIZATION AND COMPOSITION OF GOVERNING
14 BOARD. (1) The board shall adopt rules for the conduct of business .
15 The board shall adopt bylaws to govern authority affairs, which may
16 include :
17 (a) The time and place of regular meetings;
18 (b) Rules for calling special meetings;
19 (c) The method of keeping records of proceedings and official acts;
20 (d) Procedures for the safekeeping and disbursement of funds; and
21 (e) Any other provisions the board finds necessary to include .
22 (2) The governing board shall be determined by the plan and consist
23 solely of elected officials .
24 NEW SECTION . Sec. 9 . POWERS OF GOVERNING BOARD. The governing
25 board of the authority is responsible for the execution of the voter-
26 approved plan. Participating jurisdictions shall review the plan every
27 ten years . The board may:
28 (1) Levy taxes and impose benefit charges as authorized in the plan
29 and approved by authority voters;
30 (2) Enter into agreements with federal , state, local , and regional
31 entities and departments as necessary to accomplish authority purposes
32 and protect the authority ' s investments;
33 (3) Accept gifts, grants, or other contributions of funds that will
34 support the purposes and programs of the authority;
35 (4) Monitor and audit the progress and execution of police service
HE 1230 p. 6
1. projects to protect the investment of the public and annually make
2 public its findings;
3 (5) Pay for services and enter into leases and contracts, including
4 professional service contracts;
5 (6) Hire, manage, and terminate employees; and
6 (7) Exercise powers and perform duties as the board determines
7 necessary to carry out the purposes, functions, and projects of the
8 authority in accordance with this chapter, unless provided otherwise in
9 the regional public safety authority plan.
10 NEW SECTION. Sec . 10 . TRANSFER OF RESPONSIBILITIES AND EMPLOYEES
11 TO AUTHORITY--CIVIL SERVICE SYSTEM. (1) Except as otherwise provided
12 in the regional public safety authority plan, all powers, duties, and
13 functions of a participating jurisdiction pertaining to police services
14 shall be transferred to the regional public safety authority on its
15 creation date .
16 (2) (a) Except as otherwise provided in the regional public safety
17 authority plan, and on the creation date of the regional public safety
18 authority, all reports, documents, surveys, books, records, files,
19 papers, or written material in the possession of the participating
20 jurisdiction pertaining to police services powers, functions, and
21 duties shall be delivered to the regional public safety authority; all
22 real property and personal property including cabinets, furniture,
23 office equipment, motor vehicles, and other tangible property employed
24 by the participating jurisdiction in carrying out the police services
25 powers, functions, and duties shall be transferred to the regional
26 public safety authority; and all funds, credits, or other assets held
27 by the participating jurisdiction in connection with the police
28 services powers, functions, and duties shall be transferred and
29 credited to the regional public safety authority.
30 (b) Except as otherwise provided in the regional public safety
31 authority plan, any appropriations made to the participating
32 jurisdiction for carrying out the police services powers, functions,
33 and duties shall be transferred and credited to the regional public
34 safety authority.
35 (c) Except as otherwise provided in the regional public safety
36 authority plan, whenever any question arises as to the transfer of any
37 personnel, funds, books, documents, records, papers, files, equipment,
p. 7 HB 1230
1 or other tangible property used or held in the exercise of the powers
2 and the performance of the duties and functions transferred, the
3 governing body of the participating jurisdiction shall make a
4 determination as to the proper allocation.
5 (3) Except as otherwise provided in the regional public safety
6 authority plan, all rules and all pending business before the
7 participating jurisdiction pertaining to the powers, functions, and
8 duties transferred shall be continued and acted upon by the regional
9 public safety authority, and all existing contracts and obligations
10 shall remain in full force and shall be performed by the regional
11 public safety authority.
12 (4) The transfer of the powers, duties, functions, and personnel of
13 the participating jurisdiction shall not affect the validity of any act
14 performed before creation of the regional public safety authority.
15 (5) If apportionments of budgeted funds are required because of the
16 transfers, the treasurer for the authority shall certify the
17 apportionments .
18 (6) (a) Subject to (c) of this subsection, all police employees of
19 the participating jurisdiction are transferred to the jurisdiction of
20 the regional public safety authority on its creation date. Upon
21 transfer, unless an agreement for different terms of transfer is
22 reached between the collective bargaining representatives of the
23 transferring employees and the participating jurisdiction, an employee
24 is entitled to the employee rights, benefits, and privileges to which
25 he or she would have been entitled as an employee of a participating
26 jurisdiction, including rights to:
27 (i) Compensation at least equal to the level at the time of
28 transfer;
29 (ii) Retirement, vacation, sick leave, and any other accrued
30 benefit;
31 (iii) Promotion and service time accrual; and
32 (iv) The length or terms of probationary periods, including no
33 requirement for an additional probationary period if one had been
34 completed before the transfer date .
35 (b) If any or all of the participating jurisdictions provide for
36 civil service in their police departments, the collective bargaining
37 representatives of the transferring employees and the participating
HB 1230 p. 8
1 jurisdictions must negotiate regarding the establishment of a civil
2 service system within the authority. This subsection does not apply if
3 none of the participating jurisdictions provide for civil service .
4 (c) Nothing contained in this section may be construed to alter any
5 existing collective bargaining unit or the provisions of any existing
6 collective bargaining agreement until the agreement has expired or
7 until the bargaining unit has been modified as provided by law.
8 (7) This section does not apply to a public safety jurisdiction
9 with regard to police services it provides to a participating
10 jurisdiction by contract or interlocal agreement .
11 NEW SECTION . Sec. 11 . WITHDRAWAL, REANNEXATION OF TERRITORY. (1)
12 As provided in this section, a regional public safety authority may
13 withdraw areas from its boundaries or reannex into the authority areas
14 that previously had been withdrawn from the authority under this
15 section.
16 (2) (a) The withdrawal of an area is authorized upon: (i) Adoption
17 of a resolution by the board approving the withdrawal and finding that,
18 in the opinion of the board, inclusion of this area within the regional
19 public safety authority will result in a reduction of the authority' s
20 tax levy rate under the provisions of RCW 84 . 52 . 010; or (ii) adoption
21 of a resolution by the city or town council approving the withdrawal,
22 if the area is located within the city or town, or adoption of a
23 resolution by the governing body of the jurisdiction within which the
24 area is located approving the withdrawal, if the area is located
25 outside of a city or town.
26 (b) A withdrawal under this section is effective at the end of the
27 day on the thirty-first day of December in the year in which the
28 resolution under (a) (i) or (ii ) of this subsection is adopted, but for
29 purposes of establishing boundaries for property tax purposes, the
30 boundaries shall be established immediately upon the adoption of the
31 resolution.
32 (c) The withdrawal of an area from the boundaries of an authority
33 does not exempt any property therein from taxation for the purpose of
34 paying the costs of redeeming any indebtedness of the authority
35 existing at the time of withdrawal .
36 (3) (a) An area that has been withdrawn from the boundaries of a
37 regional public safety authority under this section may be reannexed
p. 9 HS 1230
1 into the authority upon: (i) Adoption of a resolution by the board
2 proposing the reannexation; and (ii) adoption of a resolution by the
3 city or town council approving the reannexation, if the area is located
4 within the city or town, or adoption of a resolution by the governing
5 body of the jurisdiction within which the area is located approving the
6 reannexation, if the area is located outside of a city or town .
7 (b) A reannexation under this section shall be effective at the end
8 of the day on the thirty-first day of December in the year in which the
9 adoption of the resolution under (a) (ii) of this subsection occurs, but
10 for purposes of establishing boundaries for property tax purposes, the
11 boundaries shall be established immediately upon the adoption of the
12 resolution .
13 (c) (i) Referendum action on the proposed reannexation under this
14 section may be taken by the voters of the area proposed to be reannexed
15 if a petition calling for a referendum is filed with the city or town
16 council within a thirty-day period after the adoption of the resolution
17 under (a) (ii) of this subsection, which petition has been signed by
18 registered voters of the area proposed to be reannexed equal in number
19 to ten percent of the total number of the registered voters residing in
20 that area.
21 (ii) If a valid petition signed by the requisite number of
22 registered voters has been so filed, the effect of the resolutions
23 shall be held in abeyance and a ballot proposition to authorize the
24 reannexation shall be submitted to the voters of the area at the next
25 special election date specified in RCW 29A. 04 . 330 that occurs forty-
26 five or more days after the petitions have been validated. Approval of
27 the ballot proposition authorizing the reannexation by a simple
28 majority vote shall authorize the reannexation.
29 NEW SECTION . Sec. 12 . DEBT---INTERLOCAL CONTRACTS--GENERAL
30 OBLIGATION BONDS. (1 ) An authority may incur general indebtedness for
31 authority purposes, issue bonds, notes, or other evidences of
32 indebtedness not to exceed an amount, together with any outstanding
33 nonvoter approved general obligation debt, equal to three-fourths of
34 one percent of the value of the taxable property within the authority.
35 The maximum term of the obligations may not exceed thirty years . The
36 obligations may pledge benefit charges and may pledge payments to an
37 authority from the state, the federal government, or any public safety
HB 1230 p. 10
1 jurisdiction under an interlocal contract . The inter_Joca.l contracts
2 pledging revenues and taxes are binding for a term not to exceed thirty
3 years, and taxes or other revenue pledged by an interlocal contract may
4 not be eliminated or modified if it would impair the pledge of the
5 contract .
6 (2 ) An authority may also issue general obligation bonds for
7 capital purposes not to exceed an amount, together with any outstanding
8 general obligation debt, equal to one and one-half percent of the value
9 of the taxable property within the authority. The authority may
10 provide for the retirement of the bonds by excess property tax levies .
11 The voters of the authority must approve a proposition authorizing the
12 bonds and levies by an affirmative vote of three-fifths of those voting
13 on the proposition at an election. At the election, the total number
14 of persons voting must constitute not less than forty percent of the
15 voters in the authority who voted at the last preceding general state
16 election. The maximum term of the bonds may not exceed twenty-five
17 years . Elections shall be held as provided in RCW 39. 36 . 050 .
18 (3) Obligations of an authority shall be issued and sold in
19 accordance with chapters 39 . 46 and 39 . 50 RCW, as applicable.
20 NEW SECTION . Sec. 13 . LEVY OF TAXES--LEVIES AUTHORIZED BY SPECIAL
21 ELECTION--INDEBTEDNESS--DEFINITION . (1) To carry out the purposes for
22 which a regional public safety authority is created, as authorized in
23 the plan and approved by the voters, the governing board of an
24 authority may annually levy the following taxes :
25 (a) An ad valorem tax on all taxable property located within the
26 authority not to exceed fifty cents per thousand dollars of assessed
27 value;
28 (b) An ad valorem tax on all property located within the authority
29 not to exceed fifty cents per thousand dollars of assessed value and
30 which will not cause the combined levies to exceed the constitutional
31 or statutory limitations . This levy, or any portion of this levy, may
32 also be made when dollar rates of other taxing units are released by
33 agreement with the other taxing units from their authorized levies; and
34 (c) An ad valorem tax on all taxable property located within the
35 authority not to exceed fifty cents per thousand dollars of assessed
36 value if the authority has at least one full-time, paid employee, or
37 contracts with another municipal corporation for the services of at
p. 11 HB 1230
1 least one full -time, paid employee. This levy may be made only if it.
2 will not affect dollar rates which other taxing districts may lawfully
3 claim nor cause the combined levies to exceed the constitutional or
4 statutory limitations or both.
5 (2) Levies in excess of the amounts provided in subsection (1) of
6 this section or in excess of the aggregate dollar rate limitations or
7 both may be made for any authority purpose when so authorized at a
8 special election under RCW 84 . 52 . 052 . Any such tax when levied must be
9 certified to the proper county officials for the collection of the tax
10 as for other general taxes . The taxes when collected shall be placed
11 in the appropriate authority fund or funds as provided by law, and must
12 be paid out on warrants of the auditor of the county in which all, or
13 the largest portion of, the authority is located, upon authorization of
14 the governing board of the authority.
15 (3) Authorities may provide for the retirement of general
16 indebtedness by excess property tax levies as set forth in section 12
17 of this act .
18 (4 ) For purposes of this chapter, the term "value of the taxable
19 property" has the same meaning as in RCW 39 . 36 . 015 .
20 NEW SECTION. Sec. 14 . LEVY OF TAXES--TO BE MADE BY COUNTY OR
21 COUNTIES WHERE AUTHORITY IS LOCATED. At the time of making general tax
22 levies in each year, the county legislative authority or authorities of
23 the county or counties in which a regional public safety authority is
24 located shall make the required levies for authority purposes against
25 the real and personal property in the authority in accordance with the
26 equalized valuations of the property for general tax purposes and as a
27 part of the general taxes . The tax levies are part of the general tax
28 roll and must be collected as a part of the general taxes against the
29 property in the authority.
30 NEW SECTION. Sec. 15 . COLLECTION OF TAXES . It is the duty of the
31 county treasurer of the county in which the regional public safety
32 authority created under this chapter is located to collect taxes
33 authorized and levied under this chapter. However, when a regional
34 public safety authority is located in more than one county, the county
35 treasurer of each county in which the authority is located shall
HB 1230 p. 12
1 collect the regional public safety authority' s taxes that are imposed
2 on property located within the county and transfer these funds to the
3 treasurer of the county in which the majority of the authority lies .
4 NEW SECTION . Sec. 16. BENEFIT CHARGES . (1) The governing board
5 of a regional public safety authority may by resolution, as authorized
6 in the plan and approved by the voters, for authority purposes
7 authorized by law, fix and impose a benefit charge on personal property
8 and improvements to real property which are located within the
9 authority on the date specified and which have received or will receive
10 the benefits provided by the authority, to be paid by the owners of the
11 properties . A benefit charge does not apply to personal property and
12 improvements to real property owned or used by any recognized religious
13 denomination or religious organization as, or including, a sanctuary or
14 for purposes related to the bona fide religious ministries of the
15 denomination or religious organization, including schools and
16 educational facilities used for kindergarten, primary, or secondary
17 educational purposes or for institutions of higher education and all
18 grounds and buildings related thereto. However, a benefit charge does
19 apply to personal property and improvements to real property owned or
20 used by any recognized religious denomination or religious organization
21 for business operations, profit-making enterprises, or activities not
22 including use of a sanctuary or related to kindergarten, primary, or
23 secondary educational purposes or for institutions of higher education .
24 The aggregate amount of these benefit charges in any one year may not
25 exceed an amount equal to sixty percent of the operating budget for the
26 year in which the benefit charge is to be collected. It is the duty of
27 the county legislative authority or authorities of the county or
28 counties in which the regional public safety authority is located to
29 make any necessary adjustments to assure compliance with this
30 limitation and to immediately notify the governing board of an
31 authority of any changes thereof .
32 (2) A benefit charge imposed must be reasonably proportioned to the
33 measurable benefits to property resulting from the services afforded by
34 the •authority. It is acceptable to apportion the benefit charge to the
35 values of the properties as found by the county assessor. Any other
36 method that reasonably apportions the benefit charges to the actual
37 benefits resulting from the degree of protection or the need of the
p. 13 HB 1230
1 properties for specialized services, may be specified in the resolution
2 and is subject to contest on the grounds of unreasonable or capricious
3 action or action in excess of the measurable benefits to the property
4 resulting from services afforded by the authority. The governing board
5 of an authority may determine that certain properties or types or
6 classes of properties are not receiving measurable benefits based on
7 criteria they establish by resolution.
8 (3) For administrative purposes, the benefit charge imposed on any
9 individual property may be compiled into a single charge, provided that
10 the authority, upon request of the property owner, provide an itemized
11 list of charges for each measurable benefit included in the charge.
12 (4) For the purposes of this section and sections 17 through 25 of
13 this act, the following definitions apply:
14 (a) "Personal property" includes every form of tangible personal
15 property including, but not limited to, all goods, chattels, stock in
16 trade, estates, or crops .
17 (b) "Personal property" does not include any personal property used
18 for farming, field crops, farm equipment, or livestock.
19 NEW SECTION . Sec. 17 . BENEFIT CHARGES--EXEMPTIONS. All personal
20 property not assessed and subjected to ad valorem taxation under Title
21 84 RCW, all property under contract or for which the regional public
22 safety authority is receiving payment for as authorized by law, all
23 property subject to chapter 54 . 28 RCW, and all property that is subject
24 to a contract for services with an authority, is exempt from the
25 benefit charge imposed under this chapter.
26 NEW SECTION . Sec. 18 . BENEFIT CHARGES--RESOLUTION--COUNTY
27 ASSESSOR ' S DUTIES . ( 1) The resolution establishing benefit charges as
28 specified in section 16 of this act must specify, by legal geographical
29 areas or other specific designations, the charge to apply to each
30 property by location, type, or other designation, or other information
31 that is necessary to the proper computation of the benefit charge to be
32 charged to each property owner subject to the resolution .
33 (2) The county assessor of each county in which the regional public
34 safety authority is located shall determine and identify the personal
35 properties and improvements to real property that are subject to a
36 benefit charge in each authority and shall furnish and deliver to the
HB 1230 p. 14
1 county treasurer of that county a listing of the properties with
2 information describing the location, legal description, and address of
3 the person to whom the statement of benefit charges is to be mailed,
4 the name of the owner, and the value of the property and improvements,
5 together with the benefit charge to apply to each.
6 NEW SECTION . Sec. 19 . BENEFIT CHARGES--ADMINISTRATION AND
7 COLLECTION BY COUNTY TREASURER. Each regional public safety authority
8 shall contract, prior to the imposition of a benefit charge, for the
9 administration and collection of the benefit charge by each county
10 treasurer, who shall deduct a percentage, as provided by contract to
11 reimburse the county for expenses incurred by the county assessor and
12 county treasurer in the administration of the resolution and this
13 chapter. The county treasurer shall make distributions each year, as
14 the charges are collected, in the amount of the benefit charges imposed
15 on behalf of each authority, less the deduction provided for in the
16 contract .
17 NEW SECTION . Sec . 20 . BENEFIT CHARGES--SUBMISSION TO VOTERS--
18 RENEWAL. (1) Notwithstanding any other provision in this chapter to
19 the contrary, any benefit charge authorized by this chapter is not
20 effective unless a proposition to impose the benefit charge is approved
21 by a sixty percent majority of the voters of the regional public safety
22 authority voting at a general election or at a special election called
23 by the authority for that purpose, held within the authority. A ballot
24 measure that contains an authorization to impose benefit charges and
25 that is approved by the voters pursuant to section 6 of this act meets
26 the proposition approval requirement of this section. An election held
27 under this section must be held not more than twelve months prior to
28 the date on which the first charge is to be assessed. A benefit charge
29 approved at an election expires in ten years or fewer as authorized by
30 the voters, unless subsequently reapproved by the voters .
31 (2) The ballot must be submitted so as to enable the voters
32 favoring the authorization of a regional public safety authority
33 benefit charge to vote "Yes" and those opposed to vote "No. " The
34 ballot question is as follows :
35 "Shall . . . . . the regional public safety authority
36 composed of (insert the participating jurisdictions)
p. 15 HB 1230
1 be authorized to impose benefit charges each year for . . .
2 (insert number of years not to exceed ten) years, not to exceed
3 an amount equal to sixty percent of its operating budget, and
4 be prohibited from imposing an additional property tax under
5 section 13 ( 1) (c) of this act?
6 YES NO
7 ❑ ❑'
8 (3) Authorities renewing the benefit charge may elect to use the
9 following alternative ballot :
10 "Shall the regional public safety authority composed
11 of (insert the participating jurisdictions) be
12 authorized to continue voter-authorized benefit charges each
13 year for . . . . (insert number of years not to exceed ten)
14 years, not to exceed an amount equal to sixty percent of its
15 operating budget, and be prohibited from imposing an additional
16 property tax under section 13 (1) (c) of this act?
17 YES NO
18 ❑ ❑'
19 NEW SECTION . Sec. 21 . BENEFIT CHARGES---ESTABLISHMENT--PUBLIC
20 HEARINGS--NOTICE TO PROPERTY OWNERS. (1) Not fewer than ten days nor
21 more than six months before the election at which the proposition to
22 impose the benefit charge is submitted as provided in this chapter, the
23 governing board of the regional public safety authority shall hold a
24 public hearing specifically setting forth its proposal to impose
25 benefit charges for the support of its legally authorized activities
26 that will maintain or improve the services afforded in the authority.
27 A report of the public hearing shall be filed with the county treasurer
28 of each county in which the property is located and be available for
29 public inspection .
30 (2) Prior to November 15th of each year the governing board of the
31 authority shall hold a public hearing to review and establish the
32 regional public safety authority benefit charges for the subsequent
33 year.
34 (3) All resolutions imposing or changing the benefit charges must
35 be filed with the county treasurer or treasurers of each county in
HB 1230 p. 16
1 which the property is located, together with the record of each public
2 hearing, before November 30th immediately preceding the year in which
3 the benefit charges are to be collected on behalf of the authority.
4 (4 ) After the benefit charges have been established, the owners of
5 the property subject to the charge must be notified of the amount of
6 the charge .
7 NEW SECTION . Sec. 22 . BENEFIT CHARGES--LIMITATION ON IMPOSITION
8 OF PROPERTY TAX. A regional public safety authority that imposes a
9 benefit charge under this chapter shall not impose all or part of the
10 property tax authorized under section 13 (1) (c) of this act .
11 NEW SECTION. Sec. 23 . BENEFIT CHARGES--COMPLAINTS--REVIEW BOARD.
12 After notice has been given to the property owners of the amount of the
13 charge, the governing board of a regional public safety authority
14 imposing a benefit charge under this chapter shall form a review board
15 for at least a two-week period and shall, upon complaint in writing of
16 an aggrieved party owning property in the authority, reduce the charge
17 of a person who, in their opinion, has been charged too large a sum, to
18 a sum or amount as they believe to be the true, fair, and just amount .
19 NEW SECTION. Sec. 24 . BENEFIT CHARGES--MODEL RESOLUTION--
20 ASSISTANCE BY WASHINGTON ASSOCIATION OF SHERIFFS AND POLICE CHIEFS.
21 The Washington association of sheriffs and police chiefs, as soon as
22 practicable, shall draft a model resolution to impose the regional
23 public safety authority benefit charge authorized by this chapter and
24 may provide assistance to authorities in the establishment of a program
25 to develop benefit charges .
26 NEW SECTION. Sec . 25 . BENEFIT CHARGES--ADDITIONAL EXEMPTION. A
27 person who is receiving the exemption contained in RCW 84 . 36 . 381
28 through 84 . 36 . 389 is exempt from any legal obligation to pay a portion
29 of the benefit charge imposed under this chapter as follows :
30 (1) A person who meets the income limitation contained in RCW
31 84 . 36 . 381 (5) (a) and does not meet the income limitation contained in
32 RCW 84 . 36. 381 (5) (b) (i) or (ii) is exempt from twenty-five percent of
33 the charge;
p. 17 HB 1230
1 (2) A person who meets the income limitation contained in RCW
2 84 . 36. 381 (5) (b) (i) is exempt from fifty percent of the charge; and
3 (3) A person who meets the income limitation contained in RCW
4 84 . 36. 381 (5) (b) (ii) shall be exempt from seventy-five percent of the
5 charge .
6 NEW SECTION. Sec. 26 . CIVIL SERVICE--WHEN AUTHORIZED OR REQUIRED.
7 ( 1) Subject to subsection (2) of this section, a regional public safety
8 authority may, by resolution of its board, provide for civil service
9 for its employees in the same manner, with the same powers, and with
10 the same force and effect as provided by chapter 41 . 08 RCW for cities,
11 towns, and municipalities, including restrictions against the discharge
12 of an employee because of residence outside the limits of the regional
13 public safety authority.
14 (2 ) If an agreement is reached to provide for civil service under
15 section 10 (6) of this act, the regional public safety authority shall
16 establish such a system as is required by the agreement .
17 NEW SECTION. Sec . 27 . ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY. Territory that is
18 annexed to a participating jurisdiction is annexed to the authority as
19 of the effective date of the annexation. The statutes regarding
20 transfer of assets and employees do not apply to the participating
21 jurisdictions in the annexation .
22 Sec . 28 . RCW 57 . 90 . 010 and 2004 c 129 s 13 are each amended to
23 read as follows :
24 Water-sewer, park and recreation, meLropoliLan park, counl_y rural
25 library, cemetery, flood control, mosquito control, diking and
26 drainage, irrigation or reclamation, weed, health, or fire protection
27 districts, and any air pollution control authority ( (or) ), regional
28 fire protection service authority, or regional public safety authority,
29 hereinafter referred to as "special districts, " which are located
30 wholly or in part within a county with a population of two hundred ten
31 thousand or more may be disincorporated when the district has not
32 actively carried out any of the special purposes or functions for which
33 it was formed within the preceding consecutive five-year period.
HS 1230 p. 18
1 Sec. 29 . RCW 84 . 09 . 030 and 2008 c 86 s 501 are each amended to
2 read as follows :
3 (1) (a) Except as provided in (b) of this subsection (1) , for the
4 purposes of property taxation and the levy of property taxes, the
5 boundaries of counties, cities, and all other taxing districts shall be
6 the established official boundaries of such districts existing on the
7 first day of August of the year in which the property tax levy is made .
8 (b) The boundaries for a newly incorporated port district ( (or) ),
9 regional fire protection service authority, or regional public safety
10 authority shall be established on the first day of October if the
11 boundaries of the newly incorporated port district ( (e ) )L regional
12 fire protection service authority, or regional public safety authority
13 are coterminous with the boundaries of another taxing district or
14 districts, as they existed on the first day of August of that year.
15 (2) In any case where any instrument setting forth the official
16 boundaries of any newly established taxing district, or setting forth
17 any change in the boundaries, is required by law to be filed in the
18 office of the county auditor or other county official, the instrument
19 shall be filed in triplicate . The officer with whom the instrument is
20 filed shall transmit two copies of the instrument to the county
21 assessor.
22 (3) No property tax levy shall be made for any taxing district
23 whose boundaries are not established as of the dates provided in this
24 section.
25 Sec . 30 . RCW 84 . 52 . 010 and 2009 c 551 s 7 are each amended to read
26 as follows :
27 Except as is permitted under RCW 84 . 55 . 050, all taxes shall be
28 levied or voted in specific amounts .
29 The rate percent of all taxes for state and county purposes, and
30 purposes of taxing districts coextensive with the county, shall be
31 determined, calculated and fixed by the county assessors of the
32 respective counties, within the limitations provided by law, upon the
33 assessed valuation of the property of the county, as shown by the
34 completed tax rolls of the county, and the rate percent of all taxes
35 levied for purposes of taxing districts within any county shall be
36 determined, calculated and fixed by the county assessors of the
p. 19 HB 1230
1 respective counties, within the limitations provided by law, upon the
2 assessed valuation of the property of the taxing districts
3 respectively.
4 When a county assessor finds that the aggregate rate of tax levy on
5 any property, that is subject to the limitations set forth in RCW
6 84 . 52 . 043 or 84 . 52 . 050, exceeds the limitations provided in either of
7 these sections, the assessor shall recompute and establish a
8 consolidated levy in the following manner:
9 ( 1) The full certified rates of tax levy for state, county, county
10 road district, and city or town purposes shall be extended on the tax
11 rolls in amounts not exceeding the limitations established by law;
12 however any state levy shall take precedence over all other levies and
13 shall not be reduced for any purpose other than that required by RCW
14 84 . 55 . 010 . If, as a result of the levies imposed under RCW 36. 54 . 130,
15 84 . 34 . 230, 84 . 52 . 069, 84 . 52 . 105, the portion of the levy by a
16 metropolitan park district that was protected under RCW 84 . 52 . 120,
17 84 . 52 . 125, 84 . 52 . 135, and 84 . 52 . 140, the combined rate of regular
18 property tax levies that are subject to the one percent limitation
19 exceeds one percent of the true and fair value of any property, then
20 these levies shall be reduced as follows :
21 (a) The levy imposed by a county under RCW 84 . 52 . 140 shall be
22 reduced until the combined rate no longer exceeds one percent of the
23 true and fair value of any property or shall be eliminated;
24 (b) If the combined rate of regular property tax levies that are
25 subject to the one percent limitation still exceeds one percent of the
26 true and fair value of any property, the portion of the levy by a fire
27 protection district that is protected under RCW 84 . 52 . 125 shall be
28 reduced until the combined rate no longer exceeds one percent of the
29 true and fair value of any property or shall be eliminated;
30 (c) If the combined rate of regular property tax levies that are
31 subject to the one percent limitation still exceeds one percent of the
32 true and fair value of any property, the levy imposed by a county under
33 RCW 84 . 52 . 135 must be reduced until the combined rate no longer exceeds
34 one percent of the true and fair value of any property or must be
35 eliminated;
36 (d) If the combined rate of regular property tax levies that are
37 subject to the one percent limitation still exceeds one percent of the
38 true and fair value of any property, the levy imposed by a ferry
HB 1230 p. 20
1 district under RCW 36. 54 , 130 must be reduced until the combined rate no
2 longer exceeds one percent of the true and fair value of any property
3 or must be eliminated;
4 (e) If the combined rate of regular property tax levies that are
5 subject to the one percent limitation still exceeds one percent of the
6 true and fair value of any property, the portion of the levy by a
7 metropolitan park district that is protected under RCW 84 . 52 . 120 shall
8 be reduced until the combined rate no longer exceeds one percent of the
9 true and fair value of any property or shall be eliminated;
10 (f) If the combined rate of regular property tax levies that are
11 subject to the one percent limitation still exceeds one percent of the
12 true and fair value of any property, then the levies imposed under RCW
13 84 . 34 . 230, 84 . 52 . 105, and any portion of the levy imposed under RCW
14 84 . 52 . 069 that is in excess of thirty cents per thousand dollars of
15 assessed value, shall be reduced on a pro rata basis until the combined
16 rate no longer exceeds one percent of the true and fair value of any
17 property or shall be eliminated; and
18 (g) If the combined rate of regular property tax levies that are
19 subject to the one percent limitation still exceeds one percent of the
20 true and fair value of any property, then the thirty cents per thousand
21 dollars of assessed value of tax levy imposed under RCW 84 . 52 . 069 shall
22 be reduced until the combined rate no longer exceeds one percent of the
23 true and fair value of any property or eliminated.
24 (2) The certified rates of tax levy subject to these limitations by
25 all junior taxing districts imposing taxes on such property shall be
26 reduced or eliminated as follows to bring the consolidated levy of
27 taxes on such property within the provisions of these limitations :
28 (a) First, the certified property tax levy rates of those junior
29 taxing districts authorized under RCW 36 . 68 . 525, 36 . 69 . 145, 35. 95A. 100,
30 and 67 . 38 . 130 shall be reduced on a pro rata basis or eliminated;
31 (b) Second, if the consolidated tax levy rate still exceeds these
32 limitations, the certified property tax levy rates of flood control
33 zone districts shall be reduced on a pro rata basis or eliminated;
34 (c) Third, if the consolidated tax levy rate still exceeds these
35 limitations, the certified property tax levy rates of all other junior
36 taxing districts, other than fire protection districts, regional fire
37 protection service authorities, regional public safety authorities,
38 library districts, the first fifty cent per thousand dollars of
p. 21 HB 1230
1 assessed valuation levies for metropolitan park districts, and the
2 first fifty cent per thousand dollars of assessed valuation levies for
3 public hospital districts, shall be reduced on a pro rata basis or
4 eliminated;
5 (d) Fourth, if the consolidated tax levy rate still exceeds these
6 limitations, the first fifty cent per thousand dollars of assessed
7 valuation levies for metropolitan park districts created on or after
8 January 1, 2002, shall be reduced on a pro rata basis or eliminated;
9 (e) Fifth, if the consolidated tax levy rate still exceeds these
10 limitations, the certified property tax levy rates authorized to fire
11 protection districts under RCW 52 . 16 . 140 and 52 . 16. 160 ( (and) ),
12 regional fire protection service authorities under RCW 52 . 26 . 140 (1) (b)
13 and (c) , and regional public safety authorities under section 13 (1) (b)
14 and (c) of this act shall be reduced on a pro rata basis or eliminated;
15 and
16 (f) Sixth, if the consolidated tax levy rate still exceeds these
17 limitations, the certified property tax levy rates authorized for fire
18 protection districts under RCW 52 . 16. 130, regional fire protection
19 service authorities under RCW 52 . 26 . 140 (1) (a) , regional public safety
20 authorities under section 13 (1) (a) of this act, library districts,
21 metropolitan park districts created before January 1 , 2002, under their
22 first fifty cent per thousand dollars of assessed valuation levy, and
23 public hospital districts under their first fifty cent per thousand
24 dollars of assessed valuation levy, shall be reduced on a pro rata
25 basis or eliminated.
26 NEW SECTION. Sec . 31 . A new section is added to chapter 84 . 52 RCW
27 to read as follows :
28 (1) If a city or town is a participating public safety jurisdiction
29 in a regional public safety authority, the regular levies of the city
30 or town shall not exceed the applicable rates provided in RCW
31 27 . 12 . 390, 52 . 04 . 081, and 84 . 52 . 043 (1) less the aggregate rates of any
32 regular levies made by the authority under RCW 52 . 26 . 140 (1) .
33 (2) If a port district is a participating public safety
34 jurisdiction in a regional public safety authority, the regular levy of
35 the port district under RCW 53 . 36 . 020 shall not exceed forty-five cents
36 per thousand dollars of assessed value of taxable property in the
HB 1230 p. 22
1 district less the aggregate rates of any regular levies imposed by the
2 authority under RCW 52 . 26. 140 ( 1) .
3 (3) For purposes of this section, "participating public safety
4 jurisdiction" means a city, town, Indian tribe, or port district that
5 is represented on the governing board of a regional public safety
6 authority.
7 Sec. 32 . RCW 84 . 52 . 052 and 2004 c 129 s 22 are each amended to
8 read as follows :
9 The limitations imposed by RCW 84 . 52 . 050 through 84 . 52 . 056, and ROW
10 84 . 52 . 043 shall not prevent the levy of additional taxes by any taxing
11 district, except school districts and fire protection districts, in
12 which a larger levy is necessary in order to prevent the impairment of
13 the obligation of contracts . As used in this section, the term "taxing
14 district" means any county, metropolitan park district, park and
15 recreation service area, park and recreation district, water-sewer
16 district, solid waste disposal district, public facilities district,
17 flood control zone district, county rail district, service district,
18 public hospital district, road district, rural county library district,
19 island library district, rural partial-county library district,
20 intercounty rural library district, cemetery district, city, town,
21 transportation benefit district, emergency medical service district
22 with a population density of less than one thousand per square mile,
23 cultural arts, stadium, and convention district, ferry district, city
24 transportation authority, ( (or) ) regional fire protection service
25 authority, or regional public safety authority.
26 Any such taxing district may levy taxes at a rate in excess of the
27 rate specified in RCW 84 . 52 . 050 through 84 . 52 . 056 and 84 . 52 . 043, or
28 84 . 55 . 010 through 84 . 55 . 050, when authorized so to do by the voters of
29 such taxing district in the manner set forth in Article VII, section
30 2 (a) of the Constitution of this state at a special or general election
31 to be held in the year in which the levy is made.
32 A special election may be called and the time therefor fixed by the
33 county legislative authority, or council, board of commissioners, or
34 other governing body of any such taxing district, by giving notice
35 thereof by publication in the manner provided by law for giving notices
36 of general elections, at which special election the proposition
p. 23 HB 1230
1 authorizing such excess levy shall be submitted in such form as to
2 enable the voters favoring the proposition to vote "yes" and those
3 opposed thereto to vote "no. "
4 NEW SECTION . Sec. 33 . If any provision of this act or its
5 application to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the
6 remainder of the act or the application of the provision to other
7 persons or circumstances is not affected.
8 NEW SECTION . Sec. 34 . Sections 1 through 27 of this act
9 constitute a new chapter in Title 35 RCW.
--- END ---
HB 1230 p. 24
Michelle R. Rasmussen
From: Mike Jackson
Sent: Monday, January 31, 2011 1:54 PM
To: Michelle R. Rasmussen
Subject: FW: Law Enforcement Districts& Interoperability
Attachments: image001.png
From: Briahna Taylor fmailto:btaylor @qth-gov,coml
Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2010 6:50 AM
To: Tom Towey; Mike Jackson
Cc: Lee Reeves
Subject; Law Enforcement Districts &Interoperability
Mayor Towey& Mike—
I am hoping this email will help us prepare for tomorrow's lunch with our legislative delegation. Mayor, I have that you
will be presenting on two different Issues—the law enforcement districts and Interoperability, Below is some
information on each that should help your prepare for tomorrow.
Wu Enforcement Districts—Over the last year a new concept has emerged, Folks are discussing whether it would be a
good idea to allow for a law enforcement district that would operate similarly to a fire district. Other states have
implemented something similar, and many have made the argument that it may be easier to get funding for law
enforcement if it were provided through a separate entity. At this point, the idea is still in conceptual form. We are
working on draft legislation to Introduce this next legislative session, but we anticipate it to be a catalyst to get the
conversation started and that more discussions will need to be had in the coming years. We would like to ask our
legislative delegation to follow the development of the legislation as it becomes more concrete. When I met with Rep.
Shea last week, he mentioned that he indicated that he would be wary of anything that supports regionalism.This could
lead to an interesting discussion for tomorrow's lunch. What is important to remember is that this legislation is just the
beginning of many more discussions exploring this concept.
Interoperability-The Washington State Patrol (WSP) has requested $60 million be in Governor Gregoire's 2011-13
Operating Budget to comply with federal narrow banding requirements. When the WSP Installs narrow banding, they
will have effectively developed a P25 Interoperable system. Therefore, the WSP will be able to be fully interoperable
with cities and counties like Spokane County that are upgrading to the P25 system. The Governor's budget will be
released later this week and we will know at that point whether the proposal will move forward. We want to ask our
legislative delegation to support the$60 million in the Operating Budget.
I hope that helps prepare you for tomorrow's lunch. Please let me know If you have any questions.
•
Briahna
Briahna Taylor
Governmental Affairs Consultant
Gordon Thomas Honeywell Governmental Affairs
Cell: (253) 310-5477
E-mail: btaylor @gth-gov.com
1
TRANSPORTATION
Agency 225
Washington State Patrol
Recommendation Summary
Dollars in Thousands
Annual FTEs General Fund State Other Funds Total Funds
2009-11 Expenditure Authority 2,420.5 75,036 421,926 496,962
Total Maintenance Level 2,424.8 81,747 425,446 507,193
Difference 4.3 6,711 3,520 10,231
Percent Change from Current Biennium 0.2% 8.9% 0.8% 2.1%
Performance Changes
Reduce Criminal Records Division Staff (7.5) (1,048) (1,048)
Reduce Specialized Staffing (3.0) (607) (607)
Narrowbanding Equipment 14,900 14,900
Reduce Electronic Services and Risk Staffing (4A) (572) (572)
Eliminate National Fire Reporting Staff (1.0) (265) (265)
Reduce Cadets at Executive Mansion (3.0) (400) (400)
Vacate General Administration Building 1,207 1,326 2,533
Reduce SWAT and Meth Response (1.5) (1,462) (1,462)
System integration(Narrowbanding) 10,200 10,200
Eliminate Interoperability Committee Support (2.0) (504) (504)
Reduce Ferry Terminal Traffic Control (9.0) (1,724) (1,724)
Eliminate Dedicated Auto Theft Program (17.0) (3,578) (3,578)
Criminal History Record System 200 200
DNA Kits 936 128 1,064
Mobile Office Platform 7.0 950 7,292 8,242
Minor Works Projects 653 653
Fire Training Academy Funding 345 345
Regional Water and Sewer System 3,100 3,100
Suspend Plan 1 Uniform COLA# (842) (1,752) (2,594)
State Data Center Rate Increase 166 555 721
Subtotal (41.0) (2,441) 31,645 29,204
Total Proposed Budget 2,383.8 79,306 457,091 536,397
Difference (36.7) 4,270 35,165 39,435
Percent Change from Current Biennium (1.5)% 5.7% 8.3% 7.9%
Total Proposed Budget by Activity
Aerial Highway Traffic Enforcement 19.7 1,218 4,324 5,542
Agency Administration 41.0 3,907 12,231 16,138
Collision Records 12.4 12 1,752 1,764
Commercial Vehicle Safety Enforcement 339.7 2,621 58,001 60,622
Crime Laboratory 181.3 30,541 17,669 48,210
Criminal Records Management 94.3 8,563 11,859 20,422
Executive Protection 46.6 4,452 2,286 6,738
Fire Protection Services 10.8 1,300 9,097 10,397
1
TRANSPORTATION
Annual FTEs General Fund State Other Funds Total Funds
Highway Traffic Enforcement and Emergency Operations 1,244.3 10,179 259,780 269,959
Impaired Driving 26.0 193 4,879 5,072
Investigative Assistance for Criminal Enforcement 87.4 7,249 15,860 23,109
Missing Children Recovery 9.5 1,731 367 2,098
Specialized Outreach Fire Services 44.6 2,275 12,608 14,883
Toxicology Laboratory 31.4 390 6,975 7,365
Traffic and Auto Theft Investigation 80.4 2,437 12,912 15,349
Vehicle Identification Number(VIN) Inspection 21.1 1,391 2,189 3,580
Transportation Budget Capital Projects 3,753 3,753
Homeland Security 93.6 847 20,549 21,396
Total Proposed Budget 2,383.8 79,306 457,091 536,397
PERFORMANCE LEVEL CHANGE DESCRIPTIONS
Reduce Criminal Records Division Staff
The Criminal Records Division will be reduced by 7.5 FTE staff. This reduction will result in about 100 fewer
classes per year for criminal justice agencies and will result in longer times for identification and criminal history
checks for law enforcement agencies.
Reduce Specialized Staffing
Funding is reduced to reflect the elimination of the following tlu-ee FTE and one contracted positions; one
detective paid for by the agency to staff the Missing and Exploited Children Task Force for a local jurisdiction
(this work will be done locally instead);two office assistants in the Missing/Unidentified Persons Unit; and one
detective in the High Tech Crimes Unit.
Narrowbanding Equipment
This item provides funding to purchase equipment needed to comply with federal narrowbanding requirements.
Equipment includes multiband radios and land mobile radio infrastructure, In the capital budget there is another
$15 million provided to purchase and install microwave systems for statewide communication coverage,purchase
and install 911 communication dispatch consoles,and procure master sites. (State Patrol Highway Account-State)
Reduce Electronic Services and Risk Staffing
Funding is reduced to reflect the elimination of the following four positions: two FTE staff in the Electronic
Services Division who provide network support;one FTE staffer the Electronic Services Division who provides
procurement support; and one FTE staff in Risk Management that provides office support to the Division.
Eliminate National Fire Reporting Staff
Funding is reduced to reflect the elimination of the position that collects emergency response information from
local fire agencies and enters it into a federal database, As a result,the annual "Fire in Washington"report will not
be done and local fire agencies will have to submit their data directly to the federal database,
Reduce Cadets at Executive Mansion
Funding is reduced to reflect the elimination of three FTE staff.
2
TRANSPORTATIO N
Vacate General Administration Building
The Washington State Patrol will have to vacate the General Administration Building in September 2011. Funding
is provided for one-time moving costs and estimated inereased lease costs at a new Olympia location. (General
Fund-State, State Patrol Highway Account-State)
Reduce SWAT and Meth Response
Funding is reduced to reflect a 1.5 FTE staff reduction in the SWAT and Methamphetami ne Response programs.
This reduction in funding will be mitigated by subsidizing current SWAT operations using the State and Federal
Seizure Accounts as available,
System Integration(Narrowbanding)
This item provides critical funding for system integration and engineering to achieve the current level of mission
critical radio communication.(State Patrol Highway Account-State)
Eliminate Interoperability Committee Support
Two FTE staff positions that support the State Interoperability Executive Committee will be eliminated. This
committee was foamed in 2003 to ensure that emergency responders across all jurisdictions can talk to each other
and share data.
Reduce Ferry Terminal Traffic Control
Funding is reduced to reflect the elimination of the cadct detachment used to manage traffic and augment security
at the Seattle ferry terminal; for reduced contracts for additional traffic control personnel for the Edmonds and
Seattle ferry terminals; and for savings for K-9 explosives dogs by relying more heavily on dogs trained by the
Transportation Security Administration. (State Patrol Highway Account-State)
Eliminate Dedicated Auto Theft Program
Seventeen FTE staff are eliminated that are currently dedicated to auto theft investigation in four major
metropolitan areas. (State Patrol Highway Account)
Criminal History Record System
Funding is provided for a feasibility study to replace the current criminal history record archive and retrieval
system. The current system used to store and retrieve over 500,000 criminal history documents received annually
is inefficient, aged,and failing. (Fingerprint Identification Account-State)
DNA Kits
Funding is provided for DNA analysis kits needed to cover a 30 percent increase in analysis requests from police
agencies. (General Fund-State, County Criminal Justice Assistance Account-State,Municipal Criminal Justice
Assistance Account-State)
Mobile Office Platform
Funding is provided to phase in a "mobile office platform" over the next five years. When fully implemented, this
platform will provide troopers with computers that will allow queries to the electronic driver and vehicle databases,
and with digital cameras to record video evidence. These tools will increase officer efficiency and data accuracy,
officer and public safety,and liability mitigation. Deploying this equipment in all pursuit vehicles will require
ongoing funding in future biemnia of S6.9 million in 2013-15,57.5 million in 2015-17, and 57.6 million hi
subsequent biennia as the equipment ages and needs replacement. (General Fund-State, State Patrol Highway
Account-State)
3
TRANSPORTATION
Minor Works Projects
Funding is provided for minor works projects including emergency infrastructure repairs ($200,000),water and
sewer upgrades($75,000), emergency backup system replacement($210,000),chiller replacement($85,000)and
roof replacements($83,000). (Washington State Patrol Highway Account-State)
Fire Training Academy Funding
Funding is provided in Fiscal Year 2013 for regular maintenance of the Fire Training Academy's roads and water
system. (Fire Service Training Account-State)
Regional Water and Sewer System
Funding is provided to conmect the Shelton Training Academy to the regional water and sewer system in lieu of the
current septic and well water system. This funding completes the project. (Washington State Patrol
Account-State)
ACTIVITY DESCRIPTIONS
Aerial Highway Traffic Enforcement
Pilots in the Aviation Section provide a rapid air response to citizen reports of possible drunk drivers and conduct
proactive aerial traffic enforcement patrols to locate,track, and coordinate the apprehension of impaired,reckless,
and aggressive drivers in support of Target Zero goals. Pilots also provide assistance to agency staff and local
jurisdictions with drug enforcement,search and rescue,homeland security,natural disasters, and aerial
surveillance. The section facilitates the transport of donor organs and blood supplies in medical emergencies. The
section also provides air transportation for the Governor and the Lieutenant Governor.
Agency Administration
The Agency Administration activity includes the Office of the Chief,Government and Media Relations,the Office
of Professional Standards, and Evidence and Records Management. In addition,this activity includes the staff
costs for each bureau director and executive assistant,as well as centralized photography,word processing,and
mail services. This activity represents those management activities that guide the entire agency in achieving its
public safety mission.
Collision Records
The Collision Records Section is the repository for statewide officer and civilian collision reports,compiling
statistical data for the Washington State departments of Transportation and Licensing. The section provides copies
of the Police Traffic Collision Report and the Vehicle Collision Report to eligible persons,upon application and
submission of a non-refundable fee to process the application.
Commercial Vehicle Safety Enforcement
This activity includes the Commercial Vehicle Enforcement Section, Motor Carrier Safety Assistance and New
Entrants Programs, School Bus Inspection Program,Compliance and Review Section,Tow Truck Inspection Unit,
and Equipment and Standards Review. These programs promote the safe travel of commercial vehicles and
school buses on Washington State highways through education, technical assistance, and enforcement activities.
4
TRANSPORTATION
Crime Laboratory
The Washington State Patrol Crime Laboratory Division operates full-service crime laboratories in Seattle,
Tacoma,Marysville, and Spokane,and limited-service crime laboratories in Kelso,Kennewick, and Tuniwater.
The laboratories provide forensic services for criminal justice agencies within the state and are accredited through
the American Society of Crime Laboratory Directors(ASCLD). Forensic laboratory services include biochemistry
of body fluids; examination of firearms/too]marks; microanalysis of trace evidence;analysis of physical evidence;
chemical analysis of evidence and controlled substances;examination of questioned documents; latent fingerprint
identification;crime scene assistance; clandestine laboratory assistance; and training for criminal justice agencies.
Criminal Records Management
This activity includes the management and operation of the statewide law enforcement telecommunications system,
A Central Computerized Enforcement Service System (ACCESS),and the Washington Crime Information Center
(WACIC). ACCESS provides telecommunications linkage to law enforcement,criminal justice agencies, and
associated state databases. It allows contact with agencies nationwide through the National Law Enforcement
Telecommunications System and access to National Crime Information Center files. The WACIC is a
computerized database of stolen property,wanted persons,missing persons,and other information of interest to
law enforcement officers and criminal justice agencies throughout the state. The Identification and Criminal
History Section is the repository for statewide fingerprint-based criminal history record information and
sex/kidnapping offender registration, The Missing and Unidentified Persons Unit maintains dental data and other
descriptive data on persons reported missing for Ionger than 30 days and unidentified human remains. Other
services include technical fmgerprint assistance and help in identifying unknown persons.
Executive Protection
This activity provides security for the Governor,the Governor's family,and the Lieutenant Governor, Executive
Protection personnel also provide law enforcement and visitor security services at the Capitol Campus and the
Department of Labor and Industries.
Fire Protection Services
This activity includes administration of the Fire Protection Bureau and the All Risk Mobilization program.Per
statute,the Fire Protection Bureau has the critical responsibility to prevent the loss of life and property for the
citizens across the state. Primary activities include providing critical response resources to local jurisdictions
facing extraordinary emergency incidents such as wildland fires;developing,managing and updating the
Mobilization Plan (Plan); and implementing the Plan during large scale emergencies. Implementing the Plan
includes receiving,reviewing and authorizing requests for mobilization,coordinating the dispatch of resources,
tracking the use of resources for payments,making the payments,and auditing the payments to ensure all funds
were used appropriately.Plan implementation also requires selected personnel to be available 24 hours a day,
seven days a week.
Highway Traffic Enforcement and Emergency Operations
Highway Traffic Enforcement includes field force commissioned officers who patrol state highways in eight
districts across Washington State. Troopers are responsible for enforcing traffic laws, investigating collisions,
assisting motorists, and providing a safe motoring environment on over 17,500 miles of state highway. This
activity also includes oversight of the Aviation Section,Canine Unit,Explosives Unit and the Washington State
Patrol Honor Guard.
5
TRANSPORTATION
Impaired Driving
The Implied Consent activity includes the Breath Test and Drug Evaluation and Classification Programs of the
Washington State Patrol. The Breath Test Program manages and maintains all evidentiary breath-testing
instruments in the state and provides all re-certification training. The section provides statistical data and analysis
related to driving under the influence(DUI)enforcement to and provides expert witness testimony on the breath
alcohol testing program. Drug recognition experts in the Drug Evaluation and Classification Program are trained
to recognize the symptoms of intoxication for seven different categories of drugs,using a 12-step standardized
process to identify drug impairment. The State Patrol provides specialized training in these skills to troopers and
officers from local law enforcement agencies.
Investigative Assistance for Criminal Enforcement
The Investigative Assistance Division provides investigative coordination, support,and training that fosters a
collaborative response to criminal activity in Washington State, The Narcotics Section provides ongoing drug
investigation training for the Washington State Criminal Justice Training Commission and local clandestine
laboratory teams,monitoring the progress of federally-funded task forces throughout the state. The Special
Weapons and Tactics Team (SWAT)responds to tactical incidents and clandestine drug labs with highly trained
personnel who execute search warrants, arrest suspects,and process evidence for criminal prosecution. The
Criminal Intelligence Unit(CIU)provides assistance to criminal justice agencies with complex criminal
investigations,as well as training to troopers,sergeants,and local law enforcement agencies on gang enforcement
and trends. The Computer Forensics Unit provides technical support and training to criminal justice agencies, and
recovers relevant evidence that may exist on computer hard drives and other storage media for use in related
criminal and internal investigations.
Missing Children Recovery
This activity includes the management and operation of the Missing and Exploited Children Task Force, a
multi-agency task force that assists law enforcement,state and federal agencies,and custodial parents or guardians
by conducting investigations on missing,abducted, and exploited children through referrals,on-site assistance,
case management, and training. The Missing Children Clearinghouse coordinates the exchange of information
among law enforcement agencies,citizens, schools, the Department of Social and Health Services, and other
interested groups regarding the location and return of missing children.
Specialized Outreach Fire Services
This activity is directed by statute to provide critical fire and life safety programs to prevent the loss of life and
property. Activities include delivery of regular and specialized fire service training and certification at the state
Fire Training Academy in North Bend as well as training sites across the state. Funding is provided to local
jurisdictions to assist with the cost of basic firefighter training. Additional activities include licensing and
certifying the fire sprinkler, fireworks aid cigarette industries, and conducting appropriate enforcement action;
conducting life safety inspections of hospitals,nursing homes, group homes, boarding homes, and child daycare
centers;and providing hazardous materials response training and technical assistance to the public and other state
agencies.
Toxicology Laboratory
The Washington State Toxicology Laboratory performs drug and alcohol testing for all coroners,medical
examiners,police agencies,prosecuting attorneys, and the Liquor Control Board. The laboratory receives over
8,000 cases each year, of which approximately half are police cases involving driving under the influence(DUI),
sexual assaults,and death investigations. The other half is coroner/medical examiner casework that supports
counties. Each toxicologist tests about 1,000 samples each year and spends one to two days each week in court
testifying in DUI-related cases.
6
TRANSPORTATION
Traffic and Auto Theft Investigation
The Criminal Investigation Division conducts investigations into vehicular homicides, vehicular assaults, felony
hit-and-run,auto thefts, crimes ou the Capitol Campus, and threats against elected officials. It provides
investigative follow-up to all felony crimes discovered by uniformed line troopers,allowing troopers to return to
their primary traffic enforcement duties. This activity also includes participation on the Fuel Tax Evasion Task
Force,which works to educate the public and industry on the fuel tax laws; investigates suspected fuel tax evasion;
and pursues prosecution of fuel tax evaders. The Washington State Patrol Crime Scene Response Team is a joint
effort of the Crime Laboratory Division,the Criminal Investigation Division,and the Identification Section,
providing comprehensive investigative services at crime scenes at the request of any law enforcement agency in the
state.
Vehicle Identification Number(VIN)Inspection
Staff in the Vehicle Identification Number(VIN)Section conduct physical inspections on vehicles that have been
rebuilt after being destroyed or declared a total loss by an insurance company. The section also performs physical
inspections as required on vehicles reported stolen,homemade vehicles,vehicles without a proper VIN, or in any
YIN discrepancy.
Transportation Budget Capital Projects
The State Patrol operates facilities that are constructed and maintained with funds appropriated from the
Transportation Budget. These facilities include district and detachment offices, commercial vehicle weighing and
inspection stations, communications centers,microwave and radio tower sites, and a training facility.
Homeland Security
The Vessel and Terminal Security Division(VATS)provides enhanced security for state ferries and terminals in
Washington. A security plan was developed by the Department of Transportation (WSDOT)to comply with the
U.S. Coast Guard Security Level I and 2 regulatory requirements. In order to meet concerns associated with
possible terrorist activities on state ferries and to comply with the WSDOT security plan, the WSP deploys
explosive detection canine and handler teams and provides electronic surveillance of public access areas in vessels
and terminals.
7
AGENCY DETAIL
Washington State Patrol
30000035
Narrow-Banding
Radio communication for emergency personnel will be converted from wideband analog to narrowband,providing
a reliable and clear communication system.
Prior Biennium Current Biennium Reappropriations Appropriations Future Cost Total Cost
15,000,000 13,000,000 28,000,000
Phase Start Date 1 End Date
Design 09.01.10109.01-10
Construction 12-01-11106-01-13
Funds: State Building Construction Account-State 28,000,000
30000050
Minor Works-Preservation
This project will preserve the fire training academy's burn building and the Vancouver crime laboratory's failing
IVAC.
Prior Biennium Current Biennium Reappropriations Appropriations Future Cost Total Cost
315,000 2,100,000 2,415,000
Funds: State Building Construction Account-State 2,415,000
B-1.00
Michelle R. Rasmussen
--om: Briahna Taylor [btaylor @gth-gov.com]
ant: Wednesday, December 15, 2010 6:50 AM
To: Tom Towey; Mike Jackson
Cc: Lee Reeves
Subject: Law Enforcement Districts & Interoperability
Mayor Towey& Mike—
I am hoping this email will help us prepare for tomorrow's lunch with our legislative delegation. Mayor, I have that you
will be presenting on two different Issues—the law enforcement districts and interoperability. Below is some
information on each that should help your prepare for tomorrow.
Law Enforcement Districts—Over the last year a new concept has emerged. Folks are discussing whether it would be a
good idea to allow for a law enforcement district that would operate similarly to a fire district. Other states have
implemented something similar, and many have made the argument that it may be easier to get funding for law
enforcement if it were provided through a separate entity. At this point, the idea Is still in conceptual form. We are
working on draft legislation to Introduce this next legislative session, but we anticipate it to be a catalyst to get the
conversation started and that more discussions will need to be had in the coming years.We would like to ask our
legislative delegation to follow the development of the legislation as it becomes more concrete. When I met with Rep.
Shea last week, he mentioned that he Indicated that he would be wary of anything that supports regionalism.This could
lead to an interesting discussion for tomorrow's lunch. What is important to remember is that this legislation is just the
beginning of many more discussions exploring this concept.
Feroperability-The Washington State Patrol (WSP) has requested $60 million be in Governor Gregolre's 2011-13
..perating Budget to comply with federal narrow banding requirements. When the WSP installs narrow banding, they
will have effectively developed a P25 interoperable system. Therefore, the WSP will be able to be fully interoperable
with cities and counties like Spokane County that are upgrading to the P25 system. The Governor's budget will be
released later this week and we will know at that point whether the proposal will move forward. We want to ask our
legislative delegation to support the$60 million in the Operating Budget.
i hope that helps prepare you for tomorrow's lunch. Please let me know if you have any questions.
Briahna
Briahna Taylor
Governmental Affairs Consultant
Gordon Thomas Honeywell Governmental Affairs
Cell: (253) 310-5477
E-mail: btavlor ef'lh-Qov.com
GORDON THOMAS HONEYWELL
Cai'.:Willet IALAFFAIRB
I ,
1
BILL REQUEST - CODE REVISER' S OFFICE
BILL REQ. # : H-0901 . 2/11 2nd draft
ATTY/TYPIST: ML : crs
BRIEF DESCRIPTION: Increasing the categorical exemptions for new
development under the state environmental policy
act .
1 AN ACT Relating to increasing the categorical exemptions for new
2 development under the state environmental policy act; adding new
3 sections to chapter 43 . 21C RCW; and creating a new section.
9 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON :
5 NEW SECTION. Sec. 1 . The legislature finds that for the majority
6 of new development and redevelopment in Washington, project review
7 under the state environmental policy act is no longex needed to ensure
8 high quality environmental outcomes that meet state and local goals,
9 and that conducting a state environmental policy review can add
10 unnecessary cost and delay.
11 The legislature further finds that state and local jurisdictions
12 have adopted a broad array of regulations and programs that have
13 substantially strengthened protections for the natural and built
19 environment, including the growth management act, shoreline management
15 act, and many others . These regulations provide for more effective and
16 consistent environmental protection within and across jurisdictions .
17 The legislative intent of this act is to preempt selected
18 categorical exemption levels in WAC 197-11-800, and adopt updated
Code Rev/ML: crs 1 H-0901 . 2/11 2nd draft
1 levels in statute . Any levels not preempted under this act remain in
2 effect .
3 NEW SECTION. Sec . 2 . A new section is added to chapter 43 . 21C RCW
4 to read as follows :
5 (1) The proposed actions contained in this section are
6 categorically exempt from the requirements of this chapter if the
7 proposed action is within an urban growth area designated under RCW
8 36. 70A. 110 . For a specific proposal, the exemptions in subsections (2)
9 through (7 ) of this section control, unless the city or county in which
10 the project is located establishes an alternative exemption level
11 consistent with section 3 of this act . If the proposed action is
12 located in more than one city or county, the lower of the agencies '
13 adopted levels controls regardless of which agency is the lead agency.
14 (2 ) Except when undertaken wholly or partly on lands covered by
15 water in a jurisdiction without a valid critical areas code under
16 chapter 36. 70A RCW, the following types of construction are exempt
17 under subsection (1) of this section :
18 (a) The construction or location of any residential structures of
19 one hundred dwelling units or fewer;
20 (b) The construction of a barn, loafing shed, farm equipment
21 storage building, produce storage or packing structure, or similar
22 agricultural structure, covering up to twenty thousand square feet, and
23 to be used only by the property owner or the property owner' s agent in
24 the conduct of farming the property. This exemption does not apply to
25 feed lots;
26 (c) The construction of an office, school , commercial,
27 recreational, service, or storage building with sixty thousand or fewer
28 square feet of gross floor area;
29 (d) The construction of a parking lot designed for one hundred
30 automobiles or fewer;
31 (e) Any landfill or excavation of two thousand five hundred cubic
32 yards or fewer of disturbed area throughout the total lifetime of the
33 fill or excavation; and any fill or excavation classified as a Class I,
34 II, or III forest practice under RCW 76 . 09 . 050 or rules adopted to
35 implement RCW 76. 09 . 050;
36 (f) The construction or installation of minor road and street
37 improvements, such as : Pavement marking; freeway surveillance and
Code Rev/ML: crs 2 H-0901 . 2/11 2nd draft
1 control systems; railroad protective devices, not including grade-
2 separated crossings; grooving; glare screen; safety barriers; energy
3 attenuators; transportation corridor landscaping, including the
4 application of Washington state department of agriculture-approved
5 herbicides by licensed personnel for right-of-way weed control as long
6 as this is not within watersheds controlled for the purpose of drinking
7 water quality; temporary traffic controls and detours; correction of
8 substandard curves and intersections within existing rights-of-way;
9 widening of a highway by less than a single lane width and no new
10 right-of-way is required; adding auxiliary lanes for localized
11 purposes, such as weaving, climbing, speed change, etc. , and no new
12 right-of-way is required; channelization and elimination of sight
13 restrictions at intersections; street lighting; guard rails and
14 barricade installation; installation of catch basins and culverts; and
15 reconstruction of existing roadbed (existing curb-to-curb in urban
16 locations) , including adding or widening of shoulders, addition of
17 bicycle lanes, paths and facilities, and pedestrian walks and paths,
18 but not including additional automobile lanes;
19 (g) Grading, excavating, filling, septic tank installations, and
20 landscaping necessary for any building or facility exempted under this
21 section, as well as fencing and the construction of small structures
22 and minor facilities accessory thereto;
23 (h) The installation of impervious underground tanks having a
24 capacity of ten thousand gallons or fewer or multiple tanks having a
25 capacity of one hundred thousand gallons or fewer; and
26 (i ) The removal of impervious underground tanks regardless of their
27 capacity.
28 (3) The exemptions provided in subsection (2) (f) through (i) of
29 this section apply to all licenses required to undertake the proposed
30 action, except where a rezone is required.
31 (4 ) Except when undertaken wholly or partly on lands covered by
32 water in a jurisdiction without a valid critical areas code under
33 chapter 36 . 70A RCW, the repair, remodeling, maintenance, or minor
34 alteration of existing private or public structures, facilities, or
35 equipment, including utilities, involving no material expansions are
36 exempt under subsection (1) of this section .
37 (a) The following maintenance activities are not exempt under this
38 subsection :
Code Rev/ML: crs 3 H-0901 . 2/11 2nd draft
1 (i) Dredging;
2 (ii) The reconstruction or maintenance of groins and similar
3 shoreline protection structures;
4 (iii) The replacement of utility cables that must be buried under
5 the surface of the bedlands; or
6 (iv) The repair or rebuilding of major dams, dikes, and reservoirs .
7 (b) If undertaken wholly or partly on lands covered by water in a
8 jurisdiction without a valid critical areas code under chapter 36. 70A
9 RCW, only minor repairs or replacement of structures, including the
10 repair or replacement of piling, ramps, floats, or mooring buoys, or
11 minor repair, alteration, or maintenance of docks are exempt under
12 subsection (1) of this section.
13 (5) Except when undertaken on lands covered by water in a
14 jurisdiction without a valid critical areas code under chapter 36. 70A
15 RCW, the approval of short plats or short subdivisions under RCW
16 58 . 17 . 060 are exempt under subsection (1) of this section. Further
17 short subdivisions or short platting within a plat or subdivision are
18 also exempt when the total lots do not exceed nine .
19 (6) All technical codes meeting minimum standards are exempt from
20 the requirements of this chapter.
21 (7) Except when undertaken wholly or partly on lands covered by
22 water in a jurisdiction without a valid critical areas code under
23 chapter 36. 70A RCW, the following types of utility-related actions are
24 exempt under subsection (1) of this section:
25 (a) All storm water, water and sewer facilities, lines, equipment,
26 hookups, or appurtenances, including, utilizing, or related to lines
27 twenty-four inches or fewer in diameter.
28 (b) The exemption includes installation and construction,
29 relocation when required by other governmental bodies, repair,
30 replacement, maintenance, operation, or alteration, that does not
31 change the action from an exempt class .
32 NEW SECTION . Sec . 3 . A new section is added to chapter 43 . 21C RCW
33 to read as follows :
34 (1) The proposed actions contained in this section are
35 categorically exempt from the requirements of this chapter if the
36 proposed action is within an urban growth area designated under RCW
37 36. 70A. 110, and the city or county in which the project is located
Code Rev/ML: crs 4 H-0901 . 2/11 2nd draft
1 establishes an exemption level consistent with this section. If a city
2 or county does not establish an exemption level under this section, the
3 exemption levels in section 2 of this act apply. If the proposed
4 action is located in more than one city or county, the lower of the
5 agencies ' adopted levels controls regardless of which agency is the
6 lead agency.
7 (2) Except when undertaken wholly or partly on lands covered by
8 water in a jurisdiction without a valid critical areas code under
9 chapter 36 . 70A RCW, the following types of construction are exempt
10 under subsection (1) of this section :
11 (a) The construction or location of any residential structures of
12 two hundred dwelling units or fewer;
13 (b) The construction of an office, school, commercial,
14 recreational, service, or storage building with one hundred twenty
15 thousand or fewer square feet of gross floor area, and with associated
16 parking facilities designed for four hundred automobiles or fewer;
17 (c) The construction of a parking lot designed for four hundred
18 automobiles or fewer; and
19 (d) Any landfill or excavation of five thousand cubic yards or
20 fewer of disturbed area throughout the total lifetime of the fill or
21 excavation; and any fill or excavation classified as a Class I, II, or
22 III forest practice under RCW 76 . 09 . 050 or rules adopted to implement
23 RCW 76. 09 . 050 .
24 NEW SECTION. Sec. 4 . A new section is added to chapter 43 . 21C RCW
25 to read as follows :
26 (1) The proposed actions contained in this section are
27 categorically exempt from the requirements of this chapter if the
28 proposed action is outside an urban growth area and is not on natural
29 resources lands designated under RCW 36. 70A. 110 . For a specific
30 proposal, the exemptions in subsections (2) through (7) of this section
31 control . If the proposed action is located in more than one city or
32 county, the lower of the agencies ' adopted levels controls regardless
33 of which agency is the lead agency.
34 (2) Except when undertaken wholly or partly on lands covered by
35 water in a jurisdiction without a valid critical areas code under
36 chapter 36 . 70A RCW, the following types of construction are exempt
37 under subsection ( 1) of this section :
Code Rev/ML: crs 5 H-0901 . 2/11 2nd draft
1 (a) The construction or location of any residential structures of
2 forty dwelling units or fewer;
3 (b) The construction of a barn, loafing shed, farm equipment
4 storage building, produce storage or packing structure, or similar
5 agricultural structure, covering up to twenty thousand square feet, and
6 to be used only by the property owner or the property owner ' s agent in
7 the conduct of farming the property. This exemption does not apply to
8 feed lots;
9 (c) The construction of an office, school, commercial,
10 recreational, service, or storage building with twenty-five thousand or
11 fewer square feet of gross floor area, and with associated parking
12 facilities designed for eighty automobiles or fewer;
13 (d) The construction of a parking lot designed for eighty
14 automobiles or fewer;
15 (e) Any landfill or excavation of one thousand cubic yards or fewer
16 of disturbed area throughout the total lifetime of the fill or
17 excavation; and any fill or excavation classified as a Class I, II, or
18 III forest practice under RCW 76. 09. 050 or rules adopted to implement
19 RCW 76. 09 . 050;
20 (f) The construction or installation of minor road and street
21 improvements, such as : Pavement marking; freeway surveillance and
22 control systems; railroad protective devices, not including grade-
23 separated crossings; grooving; glare screen; safety barriers; energy
24 attenuators; transportation corridor landscaping, including the
25 application of Washington state department of agriculture-approved
26 herbicides by licensed personnel for right-of-way weed control as long
27 as this is not within watersheds controlled for the purpose of drinking
28 water quality; temporary traffic controls and detours; correction of
29 substandard curves and intersections within existing rights-of-way;
30 widening of a highway by less than a single lane width and no new
31 right-of-way is required; adding auxiliary lanes for localized
32 purposes, such as weaving, climbing, speed change, etc. , and no new
33 right-of-way is required; channelization and elimination of sight
34 restrictions at intersections; street lighting; guard rails and
35 barricade installation; installation of catch basins and culverts; and
36 reconstruction of existing roadbed (existing curb-to-curb in urban
37 locations) , including adding or widening of shoulders, addition of
Code Rev/ML: crs 6 H-0901. 2/11 2nd draft
1 bicycle lanes, paths and facilities, and pedestrian walks and paths,
2 but not including additional automobile lanes;
3 (g) Grading, excavating, filling, septic tank installations, and
4 landscaping necessary for any building or facility exempted under this
5 section, as well as fencing and the construction of small structures
6 and minor facilities accessory thereto;
7 (h) The installation of impervious underground tanks having a
8 capacity of ten thousand gallons or fewer or multiple tanks having a
9 capacity of one hundred thousand gallons or fewer; and
10 (i) The removal of impervious underground tanks regardless of their
11 capacity.
12 (3) The exemptions provided in subsection (2) (f) through (i) of
13 this section apply to all licenses required to undertake the proposed
14 action, except where a rezone is required.
15 (4 ) Except when undertaken wholly or partly on lands covered by
16 water in a jurisdiction without a valid critical areas code under
17 chapter 36 . 70A RCW, the repair, remodeling, maintenance, or minor
18 alteration of existing private or public structures, facilities, or
19 equipment, including utilities, involving no material expansions are
20 exempt under subsection (1) of this section.
21 (a) The following maintenance activities are not exempt under this
22 subsection:
23 (i) Dredging;
24 (ii) The reconstruction or maintenance of groins and similar
25 shoreline protection structures;
26 (iii) The replacement of utility cables that must be buried under
27 the surface of the bedlands; or
28 (iv) The repair or rebuilding of major dams, dikes, and reservoirs .
29 (b) If undertaken wholly or partly on lands covered by water in a
30 jurisdiction without a valid critical areas code under chapter 36 . 70A
31 RCW, only minor repairs or replacement of structures, including the
32 repair or replacement of piling, ramps, floats, or mooring buoys, or
33 minor repair, alteration, or maintenance of docks are exempt under
34 subsection (1) of this section.
35 (5) Except when undertaken on lands covered by water in a
36 jurisdiction without a valid critical areas code under chapter 36 . 70A
37 RCW, the approval of short plats or short subdivisions under RCW
Code Rev/ML: crs 7 H-0901 . 2/11 2nd draft
1 58 . 17 . 060 are exempt under subsection (1) of this section. Further
2 short subdivisions or short platting within a plat or subdivision are
3 also exempt when the total lots do not exceed nine .
4 (6) All technical codes meeting minimum standards are exempt from
5 the requirements of this chapter.
6 (7) Except when undertaken wholly or partly on lands covered by
7 water in a jurisdiction without a valid critical areas code under
8 chapter 36 . 70A RCW, the following types of utility-related actions are
9 exempt under subsection (1) of this section:
10 (a) All storm water, water and sewer facilities, lines, equipment,
11 hookups, or appurtenances, including, utilizing, or related to lines
12 twenty-four inches or fewer in diameter.
13 (b) The exemption includes installation and construction,
14 relocation when required by other governmental bodies, repair,
15 replacement, maintenance, operation, or alteration, that does not
16 change the action from an exempt class .
17 NEW SECTION. Sec. 5 . A new section is added to chapter 43 . 21C RCW
18 to read as follows :
19 (1) The proposed actions contained in this section are
20 categorically exempt from the requirements of this chapter if the
21 proposed action is within a planning jurisdiction that is partially
22 planning under chapter 36. 70A RCW, the growth management act. For a
23 specific proposal, the exemption in subsections (2) through (6) of this
24 section control . If the proposed action is located in more than one
25 city or county, the lower of the agencies ' adopted levels controls
26 regardless of which agency is the lead agency.
27 (2) Except when undertaken wholly or partly on lands covered by
28 water, the following types of construction are exempt under subsection
29 ( 1) of this section :
30 (a) The construction or location of any residential structures of
31 twenty dwelling units or fewer;
32 (b) The construction of a barn, loafing shed, farm equipment
33 storage building, produce storage or packing structure, or similar
34 agricultural structure, covering up to twenty thousand square feet, and
35 to be used only by the property owner or the property owner ' s agent in
36 the conduct of farming the property. This exemption does not apply to
37 feed lots;
Code Rev/ML: crs 8 H-0901 . 2/11 2nd draft
1 (c) The construction of an office, school, commercial,
2 recreational, service, or storage building with twelve thousand or
3 fewer square feet of gross floor area, and with associated parking
4 facilities designed for forty automobiles or fewer;
5 (d) The construction of a parking lot designed for forty
6 automobiles or fewer;
7 (e) Any landfill or excavation of five hundred cubic yards or fewer
8 of disturbed area throughout the total lifetime of the fill or
9 excavation; and any fill or excavation classified as a Class I, II, or
10 III forest practice under RCW 76 . 09 . 050 or rules adopted to implement
11 RCW 76. 09. 050;
12 (f) The construction or installation of minor road and street
13 improvements, such as : Pavement marking; freeway surveillance and
14 control systems; railroad protective devices, not including grade-
15 separated crossings; grooving; glare screen; safety barriers; energy
16 attenuators; transportation corridor landscaping, including the
17 application of Washington state department of agriculture-approved
18 herbicides by licensed personnel for right-of-way weed control as long
19 as this is not within watersheds controlled for the purpose of drinking
20 water quality; temporary traffic controls and detours; correction of
21 substandard curves and intersections within existing rights-of-way;
22 widening of a highway by less than a single lane width and no new
23 right-of-way is required; adding auxiliary lanes for localized
24 purposes, such as weaving, climbing, speed change, etc . , and no new
25 right-of-way is required; channelization and elimination of sight
26 restrictions at intersections; street lighting; guard rails and
27 barricade installation; installation of catch basins and culverts; and
28 reconstruction of existing roadbed (existing curb-to-curb in urban
29 locations) , including adding or widening of shoulders, addition of
30 bicycle lanes, paths and facilities, and pedestrian walks and paths,
31 but not including additional automobile lanes;
32 (g) Grading, excavating, filling, septic tank installations, and
33 landscaping necessary for any building or facility exempted under this
34 section, as well as fencing and the construction of small structures
35 and minor facilities accessory thereto; and
36 (h) The removal and replacement of existing impervious underground
37 tanks regardless of their capacity.
Code Rev/ML: crs 9 H-0901 . 2/11 2nd draft
1 (3) The exemptions provided in subsection (2) (f) through (h) of
2 this section apply to all licenses required to undertake the proposed
3 action, except where a rezone is required.
4 (4 ) Except when undertaken wholly or partly on lands covered by
5 water, the following types of construction are exempt under subsection
6 ( 1) of this section:
7 (a) The repair, remodeling, maintenance, or minor alteration of
8 existing private or public structures, facilities, or equipment,
9 including utilities, involving no material expansions;
10 (b) The following maintenance activities are not exempt under this
11 subsection:
12 (i) Dredging;
13 (ii) The reconstruction or maintenance of groins and similar
14 shoreline protection structures;
15 (iii) The replacement of utility cables that must be buried under
16 the surface of the bedlands; or
17 (iv) The repair or rebuilding of major dams, dikes, and reservoirs .
18 (5) All technical codes meeting minimum standards are exempt from
19 the requirements of this chapter.
20 ( 6) Except when undertaken wholly or partly on lands covered by
21 water, the following types of utility-related actions are exempt under
22 subsection (1) of this section:
23 (a) All storm water, water and sewer facilities, lines, equipment,
24 hookups, or appurtenances, including, utilizing, or related to lines
25 twenty-four inches or fewer in diameter.
26 (b) The exemption includes installation and construction,
27 relocation when required by other governmental bodies, repair,
28 replacement, maintenance, operation, or alteration, that does not
29 change the action from an exempt class .
30 NEW SECTION. Sec. 6. A new section is added to chapter 43 . 21C RCW
31 to read as follows :
32 A city or county may establish an alternative exemption level
33 consistent with this section . A city or county may set lower exemption
34 levels for a portion of their jurisdiction or for a specific issue or
35 subject area if the city or county finds that the local development
Code Rev/ML: crs 10 H-0901 . 2/11 2nd draft
1 code is not fully sufficient to mitigate the impacts of development or
2 redevelopment .
__e END ---
Code Rev/ML: crs 11 H-0901 . 2/11 2nd draft