The URL can be used to link to this page

2011, 11-15 Special Regular Meeting AGENDA SPOKANE VALLEY CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING SPECIAL FORMAL FORMAT MEETING Tuesday,November 15,2011 6:00 p.m. Spokane Valley City Hall Council Chambers 11707 E Sprague Avenue Council Requests Please Silence Your Cell Phones During Council Meeting CALL TO ORDER: INVOCATION: Pastor Ben Orchard,Valley Bible Church PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: ROLL CALL: APPROVAL OF AGENDA: INTRODUCTION OF SPECIAL GUESTS AND PRESENTATIONS: COMMITTEE,BOARD,LIAISON SUMMARY REPORTS: MAYOR'S REPORT: PUBLIC COMMENTS: This is an opportunity for the public to speak on any subject except those on this agenda as action items. (Action items include public hearings, and those items under NEW BUSINESS. Public Comments will be taken on those items at the time those items are discussed.)When you come to the podium, please state your name and address for the record and limit remarks to three minutes. 1. CONSENT AGENDA: Consists of items considered routine which are approved as a group. Any member of Council may ask that an item be removed from the Consent Agenda to be considered separately. a.Approval of the following claim vouchers: VOUCHER LIST DATE VOUCHER NUMBERS: TOTAL AMOUNT 10-20-2011 3714-3717 $51,977.34 10-21-2011 24199-24246 $1,311,981.90 10/21/2011 24247 $7,580.30 10-21-2011 24248-24261 $103,182.70 10-25-2011 24262-24264 $1,621.20 10-28-2011 24265-24281; 8171626 $71,504.33 10-28-2011 24282 $603.65 10-28-2011 24283-24295 $343,283.28 10-28-2011 5372-5379 $626.00 11-02-2011 3729-3732; 3745,24296-24300 $220,174.54 11-04-2011 24301-24324 $60,002.40 11-04-2011 24325-24377; 1031110018; 1101110142 $1,744,622.11 GRAND TOTAL $3,917,159.75 b.Approval of Payroll for period ending October 31,2011: $367,329.07 c. Approval of Minutes of October 11,2011 Formal Format Council Meeting d.Approval of Minutes of October 18,2011 Study Session Format Council Meeting Council Agenda 11-15-2011 Special Formal Format Meeting Page 1 of 2 e.Approval of Minutes of October 25,2011 Formal Format Council Meeting f.Approval of Minutes of November 1, 2011 Study Session Format Council Meeting NEW BUSINESS: 2. Second Reading Proposed Ordinance 11-017 Adopting 2012 Budget—Mark Calhoun [public comment] 3. Second Reading Proposed Ordinance 11-018 Franchise Agreement Bonneville Power— Kelly Konkright [public comment] 4.First Reading Proposed Ordinance 11-019 Amending 2011 Budget—Mark Calhoun [public comment] 5. Proposed Resolution 11-009 Amending Speed Limits(Indiana)—Inga Note [public comment] 6.Motion Consideration: Stormwater Grant,New Decant(Vactor Waste)Facility—Neil Kersten [public comment] PUBLIC COMMENTS: This is an opportunity for the public to speak on any subject except those on this agenda as action items. (Action items include public hearings, and those items under NEW BUSINESS. Public Comments will be taken on those items at the time those items are discussed.)When you come to the podium, please state your name and address for the record and limit remarks to three minutes. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS: 7. Planning Commission Revised Rules of Procedure—Scott Kuhta 8. Code Text Amendment 04-11,Recycling Facility—Mike Basinger 9.Acquisition of Brown's Park—Kelly Konkright 10. Criminal Code Maximum Penalty,Gross Misdemeanor—Kelly Konkright 11. Electric Lightwave Franchise—Kelly Konkright 12. Review of Governor's Budget Reduction Alternatives—Morgan Koudelka/Mark Calhoun 13.Advance Agenda—Mayor Towey INFORMATION ONLY(will not be discussed or reported): 14. Spokane County Library District Third Quarter Report 15. Community Development Monthly Report ADJOURNMENT General Meeting Schedule (meeting schedule is always subject to change) Regular Council meetings are generally held every Tuesday beginning at 6:00 p.m. The Formal meeting formats are generally held the 2nd and 4th Tuesdays. Formal meeting have time allocated for general public comments as well as comments after each action item. The Study Session formats(the less formal meeting) are generally held the 1St 3rd and 5d'Tuesdays. Study Session formats DO NOT have time allocated for general public comments; but if action items are included,comments are permitted after those specific action items. NOTICE: Individuals planning to attend the meeting who require special assistance to accommodate physical, hearing, or other impairments, please contact the City Clerk at (509) 921-1000 as soon as possible so that arrangements may be made. Council Agenda 11-15-2011 Special Formal Format Meeting Page 2 of 2 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: November 15, 2011 Department Director Approval: El Check all that apply: ® consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Approval of the Following Vouchers: VOUCHER LIST DATE VOUCHER NUMBERS: TOTAL AMOUNT 10-20-2011 3714-3717 $51,977.34 10-21-2011 24199-24246 $1,311,981.90 10/21/2011 24247 $7,580.30 10-21-2011 24248-24261 $103,182.70 10-25-2011 24262-24264 $1,621.20 10-28-2011 24265-24281; 8171626 $71,504.33 10-28-2011 24282 $603.65 10-28-2011 24283-24295 $343,283.28 10-28-2011 5372-5379 $626.00 11-02-2011 3729-3732; 3745,24296-24300 $220,I74.54 11-04-2011 24301-24324 $60,002.40 11-04-2011 24325-24377; 1031110018; 1101110142 $1,744,622.11 GRAND TOTAL $3,917,159.75 RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Approve claims for vouchers as listed above. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: STAFF CONTACT: Mark Calhoun, Finance Director ATTACHMENTS Voucher Lists vchlist Voucher List Page: 1 10120/2011 11:44:02AM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 3714 10/20/2011 000048 VANTAGE TRANSFER AGENTS,401A PLAN Ben40630 001.231.14. 401A:Payment 19,694.75 Total: 19,694.75 3715 10/20/2011 000682 EFTPS Ben40632 001.231.11. FEDERAL TAXES:Payment 26,163.12 Total: 26,163.12 3716 10/20/2011 000145 VANTAGEPOINT TRANSFER AGENTS,457 PLf Ben40634 001.231.18. 457 DEFERRED COMPENSATION:Payn 5,092.80 Total: 5,092.80 3717 10/20/2011 000162 VANTAGE TRANSFER AGENTS,401A EXEC PL Ben40636 001,231.14. 401 EXEC PLAN:Payment 1,026.67 Total: 1,026.67 4 Vouchers for hank code: apbank Bank total: 51,977.34 4 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers: 51,977.34 I,the undersigned,do certify under penalty of perjury, that the materials have been furnished,the services rendered,or the labor performed as described herein and that the claim is just,due and an unpaid obligation against the City of Spokane Valley,and that I am authorized to authenticate and certify said claim. Finance Director Date Mayor Date Council Member Date Page: 1 whilst 1 012112011 9:07:52AM Voucher List Page: 1 Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 24199 10/21/2011 000958 AAA SWEEPING, LLC 46711 402.402.000 2011 VACTORING SERVICES CONT 23,366.50 SPOV03 402.402.000 2011 STREET SWEEPING SREVICE 18,358.58 Total : 41,725.08 24200 10/21/2011 002816 ABLE CLEAN-UP TECHNOLOGIES 14623 101.042.000 HAZARD WASTE 326.10 Total : 326.10 24201 10/21/2011 001873 ACME CONCRETE PAVING INC Pay App 1 303.303.113 0113 INDIANA SULLIVAN INTERSEC 641,484.82 Total : 641,484.82 24202 10/21/2011 001540 ARNOLD, DARLA EXPENSE 001.032.000 TRAVEL REIMBURSEMENT 609.41 Total : 609.41 24203 10/21/2011 002562 CD'AMEI'ALS 376686 101.042.000 SUPPLIES:PW 120.06 378591 101.042.000 SUPPLIES:PW 539.96 381288 101.042.000 SUPPLIES:PW 56.58 Total : 716.60 24204 10/21/2011 002885 CHAMPAGNE,ALAN CRYWOLF:3552893157 001.000.000 CRYWOLF REFUND: PERMIT#V40 25.00 Total : 25.00 24205 10/21/2011 002838 COMMERCIAL GRADING INS 11-114 101.042.000 UBIT BRIDGE INSPECTION TRUCK 2,934.90 Total : 2,934.90 24206 10/21/2011 000603 CONTRACT DESIGN ASSOC INC 30565 001.018.014 CHAIRS 1,347.55 Total : 1,347.55 24207 10/21/2011 000284 CRUCIAL TECHNOLOGY INC 247102300 001.090.000 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 243.34 Total : 243.34 24208 10/21/2011 000683 DAVID EVANS&ASSOCIATES 309230 303.303.148 GREENACRES TRAIL DESING 2,458.04 Total : 2,458.04 24209 10/21/2011 002883 DOUGLAS, LANCE SWALE RETAINAGE 001.237.10. COMPLETED SWALES RETAINAGE 6,000.00 Total : 6,000.00 24210 10/21/2011 000999 EASTERN WA ATTORNEY SVC, INC 54453 001.013.015 LEGAL SERVICES 53.00 Page: 1 vchlist 10121/2011 9:07:52AM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: 2 Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor 24210 10/21/2011 000999 EASTERN WA ATTORNEY SVC, INC 24211 10/21/2011 002157 ELJAY OIL COMPANY Invoice (Continued) 54837 4187866 24212 10/21/2011 002887 ETTER,MCMAHON,LAMBERSON,CLARY, 1 24213 10/21/2011 001232 FASTENAL CO PURCHASING 24214 10/21/2011 002507 FASTENERS, INC 24215 10/21/2011 002886 FISHER, MICHAEL 24216 10/21/2011 001447 FREE PRESS PUBLISHING INC 24217 10/21/2011 002520 HUSKY INTERNATIONAL TRUCKS Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount I DLEW77890 53154887.001 S3159655,001 S3161083.001 53161083.002 001.013.015 LEGAL SERVICES 101.042.000 Total : SEPTEMBER 2011 OIL PRODUCTS 001.013.015 WFE-MEDIATOR 101.042.000 SUPPLIES:PW 101.042.000 SUPPLIES: PW 101.042.000 SUPPLIES: PW 101.042.000 SUPPLIES: PW 101.042.000 SUPPLIES: PW CRYWOLF:3552903139 001.000.000 Total : 40.00 93.00 372.15 372.15 1,475.35 Total : 1,475.35 Total : Total : CRYWOLF REFUND: PERMIT#V40 Total : 37013 001.058.056 LEGAL PUBLICATION 55377 101.042.000 PLOW TRUCK PARTS 55470 101.042.000 PLOW TRUCK PARTS 55610 101.042.000 PLOW TRUCK PARTS 56001 101.042.000 PLOW TRUCK PARTS 56029 101.042,000 PLOW TRUCK PARTS 56064 101.042.000 PLOW TRUCK PARTS 56096 101.042.000 PLOW TRUCK PARTS 56125 101.042.000 PLOW TRUCK PARTS 56152 101.042.000 PLOW TRUCK PARTS 56251 101.042.000 PLOW TRUCK PARTS 56291 101.042.000 PLOW TRUCK PARTS 56423 101.042.000 PLOW TRUCK PARTS 56432 101.042.000 PLOW TRUCK PARTS Total : 2.72 2.72 238.71 17.64 1,017.70 85.80 1,359.85 25.00 25.00 78.20 78.20 1,371.09 600.46 154.14 338.47 10.87 107.48 16,75 338.88 21.35 111.60 1,798.49 153.53 57.47 Page: 2 vchlist 10/21/2011 9:07:52AM Voucher List Page: 3 Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 24217 10/21/2011 002520 HUSKY INTERNATIONAL TRUCKS (Continued) 773976 101.042.000 PLOW TRUCK PARTS 875.58 774142 101.042.000 PLOW TRUCK PARTS 48.64 774166 101.042.000 PLOW TRUCK PARTS 296.52 774188 101.042.000 PLOW TRUCK PARTS 48.64 774198 101.042.000 PLOW TRUCK PARTS 53.25 CM55470 101.042.000 PLOW TRUCK PARTS -40.59 Total : 6,362.62 24218 10/21/2011 002518 INLAND PACIFIC HOSE&FITINGS 461562 101.042.000 SUPPLIES: 108.91 Total : 108.91 24219 10/21/2011 002884 KAELIN,JON CRYWOLF:6000000001/2 001.000.000 CRYWOLF REFUND: PERMIT#V38 60.00 Total : 60.00 24220 10/21/2011 002522 KOEGEN EDWARDS LLP 1899 001.013.015 PROFESSIONAL SVCS: POLICE SE 52.20 1900 001.013.015 PROFESSIONAL SVCS: LUPA(1) 1,350.00 1901 001.013.015 PROFESSIONAL SVCS: SHORELIN 253.10 Total : 1,655.30 24221 10/21/2011 000258 MICROFLEX INC. 00020229 001.090.000 TAXTOOLS SOFTWARE RENTAL:SI 343.83 Total : 343.83 24222 10/21/2011 000662 NAIL BARRICADE&SIGN CO 74329 402.402.000 SUPPLIES:PW 326.10 Total : 326.10 24223 10/21/2011 001035 NETWORK DESIGN&MANAGEMENT 20408 001.090.000 SYSTEM MONTHLY MAINTENANCE 187.50 20448 101.042.000 CEILING MOUNT 1,259.73 3007 001.090.000 SYSTEM MONTHLY MAINTENANCE 5,980.00 Total : 7,427.23 24224 10/21/2011 001546 NORCO, INC 08593280 101.042.000 SUPPLIES: PW 41.40 Total : 41.40 24225 10/21/2011 002709 NORTHWEST HOSE&FITTINGS 371365-001 101.042.000 SUPPLIES: PW 558.81 371365-002 101.042.000 SUPPLIES: PW 34.63 Total : 593.44 Page: 3 vchlist 10/21/2011 9:07:52AM Voucher List Page: 4 Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 24226 10/21/2011 000307 OFFICE OF THE STATE TREASURER SEPTEMBER 2011 001.016.000 STATE REMITTANCE 63,085.24 Total : 63,085.24 24227 10/21/2011 002243 ORBITCOM 00502153 001.090.000 EITHERNET: OCTOBER 2011 590.00 Total : 590.00 24228 10/21/2011 000881 OXARC R084725 101.042.000 SUPPLIES: PW 123.81 SSR0707 101,042.000 SUPPLIES: PW 124.64 Total : 248.45 24229 10/21/2011 002424 PITNEY BOWES GLOBAL 1428301-QT11 001.090.000 OCTOBER 2011: POSTAGE METER 275.00 Total : 275.00 24230 10/21/2011 001089 POE ASPHALT PAVING, INC. SEPTEMBER 30,2011 101.042.000 2011 STREET AND STORMWATER li 364,027.00 Total : 364,027.00 24231 10/21/2011 002510 POHL SPRING WORKS INC 152994 101.042.000 SUPPLIES: PW 373.17 Total : 373.17 24232 10/21/2011 002531 SIX ROBBLEES INC 5-614987 101.042.000 SUPPLIES: PW 577.98 5-614987-1 101.042.000 SUPPLIES: PW 27.39 5-614987-2 101.042.000 SUPPLIES: PW 35.87 5-615156 101.042.000 SUPPLIES: PW 179.36 5-615222 101.042.000 SUPPLIES: PW 172.89 5-615318 101.042.000 SUPPLIES: PW -124.35 Total: 869.14 24233 10/21/2011 000172 SPOKANE CO ENGINEER VLY1109 101.042.000 COUNTY SERVICES 62,515.34 Total: 62,515.34 24234 10/21/2011 000090 SPOKANE CO INFO SYSTEMS 50307455 001.018.013 COUNTY IT SUPPORT 14,490.61 Total : 14,490.61 24235 10/21/2011 000308 SPOKANE CO PROSECUTING ATTY SEPTEMBER 2011 001.016.000 CRIME VICTIMS COMP FUND 843.48 Total : 843.48 24236 10/21/2011 000001 SPOKANE CO TREASURER 11002314 101.042.000 CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION 967.30 51500876 101.042.000 SEPTEMBER 2011:WORK CREW 4,886.54 Page: 4 vchlist Voucher List 1012112011 9:07:52AM Spokane Valley Page: 5 Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 24236 10/21/2011 000001 000001 SPOKANE CO TREASURER (Continued) 24237 10/21/2011 000898 SPOKANE PROCARE 24238 10/21/2011 001903 SPOKANE TRAFFIC CONTROL 24239 10/21/2011 002605 SPOT DEVICES INC 24240 10/21/2011 000257 STATE AUDITOR'S OFFICE 24241 10/21/2011 001464 TW TELECOM 24242 10/21/2011 000087 VERIZON WIRELESS 24243 10/21/2011 000140 WALT'S MAILING SERVICE 24244 10/21/2011 000676 WEST 24245 10/21/2011 000089 XO COMMUNICATIONS 24246 10/21/2011 001885 ZAYO BANDWIDTH LLC 48 Vouchers for bank code: apbank 48 Vouchers in this report 2011-09 1811 SINV-00001635 L90402 04474077 6633893765 30040 823636493 823747703 0246195734 October 2011 Total : 101.042.000 2011 LANDSCAPING CONTRACT# Total : 101.042.000 CRACKSEAL 32ND:DISHMAN MICA Total : 101.042.000 SCHOOL ZONE FLASHING BEACOP Total : 001.090.000 STATE AU D[TORS Total : 001.076.305 INTERNET/DATA LINES/PHONE LINT Total : 101.042.000 WIRELESS DATA CARDS Total : 303.303.069 PARK RD RECONSTRUTION PROJE Total : 001.013.015 LEGAL SUBSCRIPTION 001.013.015 SUBSCRIPTION PRODUCT Total : 001.090.000 INTERNET/DATA LINES Total : 001.090.000 DARK FIBER LEASE Total : Bank total : Total vouchers : 5,853.84 14,143.85 14,143.85 3,280.00 3,280.00 18,525.68 18,525.68 39,805.12 39,805.12 1,272.62 1,272.62 1,283.93 1,283.93 870.31 870.31 658.63 252.74 911.37 279.42 279.42 242.39 242.39 1,311,981.90 1,311,981.90 Page: 5 vchlist 1012112011 11:48:59AM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: 1 Bank code: apbank Voucher 24247 Date Vendor 10/21/2011 002522 KOEGEN EDWARDS LLP 1 Vouchers for bank code: apbank 1 Vouchers in this report 1,the undersigned,do certify under penalty of perjury, that the materials have been furnished,the services rendered,or the labor performed as described herein and that the claim is just,due and an unpaid obligation against the City of Spokane Valley,and that I am authorized to a h-nticate and certify said claim. Finance Director 44Mayor r , r r/!�' /600,-1(-Council Member Date IP/2-'h Date /%y%12 rs Date Invoice 1899 1900 1901 Fund/Dept Description/Account 001.01 3.015 001.013.015 001.013.015 PROFESSIONAL SVCS:POLICE SE PROFESSIONAL SVCS:LUPA(1) PROFESSIONAL SVCS: SHORELIN Total: RECEIVED CITY f•' Cn')KA.NIP VALLEY OCT 2 5 2011 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE Amount 5,977.20 1,350.00 253.10 7,580.30 Bank total : 7,580.30 Total vouchers: 7,580.30 Page: 1 vchlist 10/21/2011 2:24:30PM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: 1 Bank code: Voucher 24248 24249 24250 24251 24252 24253 24254 24255 24256 24257 apbank Date Vendor 10/21/2011 001081 ALSCO 10/21/2011 000030 AVISTA 10/21/2011 002662 DAVID'S BRIDAL INC 10/21/2011 001447 FREE PRESS PUBLISHING INC 10/21/2011 000011 GREATER SPOKANE VALLEY 10/21/2011 002607 HUB SPORTS CENTER 10/21/2011 000132 MODERN ELECTRIC WATER CO 10/21/2011 000710 SPOKANE CO BAR ASSOC 10/21/2011 000323 SPOKANE CO UTILITIES Invoice LSP01041683 September 2011 7011996 7012903 37010 October 2011 1367 September 2011 October 2011 October 2011 10/21/2011 002306 TERRELL, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, MIC 682 684 685 24258 10/21/2011 000295 VALLEYFEST 1414 1417 Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 001.058.057 FLOOR MATS:BUILDING 101.042.000 UTILITIES: PW MASTER AVISTA Total : 001.076.305 001.076.305 001.058.056 LEGAL PUBLICATION Total : MONTHLY LICENSE FEE:ACCT 532 MONTHLY LICENSE FEE:ACCT 532 Total : Total : 001.090.000 OUTSIDE AGENCY GRANT 2011 Total : 105.105.004 LODGING TAX 2011 GRANT REIMBI 101.042.000 UTILITIES:PW 001.013.015 2011-2012 MEMBERSHIP DUES Total : Total : Total : 101.042.000 UTILITIES:MAINTENANCE FACILITI Total : 309.309.079 309.309.079 309.309.079 105.105.000 105.105.000 GREENACRES PARK PHASE I DESI GREENACRES PARK PHASE I DESI GREENACRES PARK PHASE I DESI Total : LODGING TAX 2011 REIMBURSEME LODGING TAX 2011 GRANT REIMBL Total : 33.22 33.22 22,652.79 22,652.79 175.00 175.00 350.00 118.40 118.40 7,089.00 7,089.00 2,056.65 2,056.65 9,049.59 9,049.59 105.00 105.00 90.08 90.08 20,212.36 330.00 550.00 21,092.36 3,280.82 1,800.00 5,080.82 Page: 1 vchlist 10/21/2011 2:24:30PM Voucher List Page: 2 Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 24259 10/21/2011 000038 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF SPOKANE 0054195-1518-3 402.402.000 SEPTEMBER 2011 2,463.79 Total : 2,463.79 24260 10/21/2011 000310 WSAMA 81124 001.013.015 2011 WSAMA MEMBERSHIP 10.00 Total : 10,00 24261 10/21/2011 000487 YMCA OF THE INLAND NW October 2011 001.076.302 SEPTEMBER 2011 OPERATION ANC 32,991,00 Total : 32,991.00 14 Vouchers for bank code: apbank Bank total : 103,182.70 14 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers : 103,182.70 1,the undersigned,do certify under penalty of perjury, that the materials have been furnished,the services rendered,or the labor performed as described herein and that the claim is just,due and an unpaid obligation against the City of Spokane Valley,and that 1 am authorized to authenticate and certify said claim. Finance Director Date Mayor Date Council Member Date Page: 2 vchlist 1012512011 4:16:54PM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: 1 Bank code: Voucher 24262 24263 24264 apbank Date Vendor Invoice 10/25/2011 002891 BASIN SOD INCORPORATED 10/25/2011 000962 WSBA 10/25/2011 000962 WSBA 3 Vouchers for bank code: apbank 3 Vouchers in this report I,the undersigned,do certify under penalty of perjury, that the materials have been furnished,the services rendered,or the labor performed as described herein and that the claim is just,due and an unpaid obligation against the City of Spokane Valley,and that I am authorized to authenticate and certify said claim. Finance Director Date Mayor Date Council Member Date 3987 2012 RENEWAL 2012 RENEWAL Fund/Dept 101.042.000 001.013.015 001.013.015 Description/Account Amount SOD: PUBLIC WORKS Total : LICENSE RENEWAL: CARY DRISKE Total : LICENSE RENEWAL: KELLY KONKF Total : 661.20 661.20 480.00 480.00 480.00 480.00 Bank total: 1,621.20 Total vouchers: 1,621.20 Page: 1 vchlist 10/28/2011 8:14:08AM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: 1 Bank code: Voucher 24265 24266 24267 24268 24269 24270 24271 apbank Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 10/28/2011 000322 CENTURYLINK 10/28/2011 001169 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY 10/28/2011 000734 DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION 10/28/2011 000912 DEX MEDIA WEST 10/28/2011 000924 ELLER CORP 10/28/2011 000746 EMPLOYMENT SECURITY DEPT 10/28/2011 001447 FREE PRESS PUBLISHING INC 24272 10/28/2011 000839 GENERAL FIRE EQUIP CO 24273 10/28/2011 002201 HARBOR FREIGHTTOOLS 24274 10/28/2011 002810 INLAND NW PARTNERS ASSOC OCTOBER 2011 001.076.302 OCTOBER 2011 101.042.000 RE 46 JG6362 L007 303.303.113 OCTOBER 2011 001.076.304 OCTOBER 2011 001.076.305 PAY APP#1 402.402.000 217156.00 2 502.502.000 37037 37038 37039 37040 37041 37042 37043 37044 0016631 02-00519911 OCTOBER 2011 001.013.000 001.013.000 001.013.000 001.013 000 001.058.056 001.058.056 001.058.056 001.058.056 OCTOBER 2011:PHONE SERVICE Total : PERMIT: MAG STORAGE Total : SIGNAL DESIGN PARTICIPATION Total : ADVERTISING:SENIOR CENTER ADVERTISING:CP Total : 2011 STORMWATER SMALL WORK. Total : 3RD QTR 2011 LEGAL PUBLICATION LEGAL PUBLICATION LEGAL PUBLICATION LEGAL PUBLICATION LEGAL PUBLICATION LEGAL PUBLICATION LEGAL PUBLICATION LEGAL PUBLICATION Total : Total : 502.502.000 FIRE EXTINGUISHER SERVICE: FL' Total : 502.502.000 TOOL BAGS FOR FLEET 001.011.000 2011 WINTER MEETING Total : 163.57 163.57 541.35 541.35 8,651.60 8,651.60 42.84 49.06 91.90 36,582.70 36,582.70 1,857.53 1,857.53 51.20 38.40 34.85 25.00 62.90 72.25 61.20 77.35 423.15 1,338.53 1,338.53 60.83 60.83 60.00 Page: 1 vchlist 10/2812011 8:14:08AM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: 2 Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 24274 10/28/2011 002810 002810 INLAND NW PARTNERS ASSOC (Continued) 24275 10/28/2011 000012 JOURNAL OF BUSINESS INC. 2011 renewal 24276 10/28/2011 000041 PROTHMAN COMPANY 24277 10/28/2011 002288 SARGENT ENGINEERS INC. 1110.011 ■■ . a • rr 'rl 2011-3138 27338 27339 27436 24279 10/28/2011 002815 SPOKANE CO COMMUNITY SERVICES 14500249 001.011.000 001.011.000 101.042.000 101.042.000 101.042.000 Ii i : Total : JOURNAL OF BUSINESS SUBSCRIF Total : INTERIM DEPUTY CITY MGR SERVI Total : BRIDGE AND STRUCTURAL CONSI BRIDGE AND STRUCTURAL CONSI BRIDGE AND STRUCTURAL CONSI Total : . a.. 24280 10/28/2011 002679 SPOKANE CO OFFICE OF FINANCIAL SEPT 2011 24281 10/28/2011 002839 WIND WIRELESS INC. 8171626 10/28/2011 000409 DEPT OF REVENUE 18 Vouchers for bank code: apbank 18 Vouchers in this report 70512 3rd Qtr Total : 001.090.000 3RD QTR 2011: EXCISE&LIQUOR Total : 001.016.000 SCSO 2011 CHILD SAFETY SEAT El Total : 101.042.000 WIRELESS TELEPHONE/INTERENT Total : 101.042.000 RETAILING&OTHER ACTIVITIES:C Total : Bank total : 60.00 79.95 79.95 1,575.00 1,575.00 1,581.48 3,239.80 4,935.50 9,756.78 -69"x.6 605.65 4,782.41 4,782.41 576.08 576.08 84.95 84.95 4,878.00 4,878.00 72,109.98 Total vouchers : 72,40.9�98- Page; 2 vchlist 10/28/2011 9:38:07AM Voucher List Page: 1 Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 24282 10/28/2011 002285 SKINFILL, LINDSEY EXPENSE 001.018.016 AWC HEALTHY WORKSITE SUMMIT 603.65 Total : 603.65 1 Vouchers for bank code: apbank Bank total : 603.65 1 Vouchers in this report I,the undersigned,do certify under penalty of perjury, that the materials have been furnished,the services rendered,or the labor performed as described herein and that the claim is just,due and an unpaid obligation against the City of Spokane Valley,and that I am authorized to authenticate and certify said claim. Finance Director Date Mayor Date Council Member Date Total vouchers : 603.65 Page: 1 vchlist 10/28/2011 3:15:41 PM Voucher List Page: 1 Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 24283 10/28/2011 000030 AVISTA September 2011 001.076.300 UTILITIES:PARKS MASTER AVISTA 15,167.22 Total : 15,167.22 24284 10/28/2011 001606 BANNER BANK 0618 001.011.000 OCT 2011:0618 476.74 0638 001.011.000 OCT 2011:0638 25.00 4064 001.058.050 OCT 2011:4064 5,311.47 4375 001.011.000 OCT 2011:4375 240.00 4458 001.011.000 OCT 2011:4458 119.37 4720 001.018.014 OCT 2011:4720 3,902.25 8861 001.076.301 OCT 2011:8861 1,855.99 Total : 11,930.82 24285 10/28/2011 002650 BERGAN, MIKE Expenses 101.042.000 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 162.65 Total : 162.65 24286 10/28/2011 002807 BOUTEN CONSTRUCTION CO. App#2 309.309.079 GREENACRES PARK PHASE 1 271,002.96 Total : 271,002.96 24287 10/28/2011 000572 CARTER, CAROL Expense 001.076.305 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 5.00 Total : 5.00 24288 10/28/2011 000840 CLARY,AARON Expenses 402.402.000 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 223.31 Total : 223.31 24289 10/28/2011 000070 INLAND POWER&LIGHT CO 94202 101.042.000 UTILITIES:OCT 2011 PW 192.11 Total : 192.11 24290 10/28/2011 000353 INTL TRADE ALLIANCE SpV22011 001.090.000 3RD QTR 2011 OUTSIDEAGENCIE: 3,375.00 Total : 3,375.00 24291 10/28/2011 000635 KUHTA,SCOTT Expenses 001.058.056 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 71.28 Total : 71.28 24292 10/28/2011 000387 MODEL IRRIGATION DIST.#18 2011 001.076.300 WATER CHARGES APRIL TO OCT 2 801.68 Total : 801.68 24293 10/28/2011 000193 NORTHWEST CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC November 2011 001.090.000 CITY HALL RENT 38,416.84 Page: 1 vchlist 10/2812011 3:15:41PM Voucher List Page: 2 Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 24293 10/28/2011 000193 000193 NORTHWEST CHRISTIAN SCHOOL I (Continued) Total : 38,416.84 24294 10/28/2011 000709 SENSKE LAWN&TREE CARE INC. 4394543 402.402.000 2011 EMERGENCY TRAFFIC CONTI 169.57 Total : 169.57 24295 10/28/2011 002892 WALLS CONSTRUCTION CORP REFUND 001.058.059 PERMIT REFUND 1,764.84 Total : 1,764.84 13 Vouchers for bank code: apbank Bank total : 343,283.28 13 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers : 343,283.28 I,the undersigned,do certify under penalty of perjury, that the materials have been furnished,the services rendered,or the labor performed as described herein and that the claim is just,due and an unpaid obligation against the City of Spokane Valley,and that I am authorized to authenticate and certify said claim. Finance Director Date Mayor Date Council Member Date Page: 2 vchlist 10/28/2011 10:26:17AM Voucher List Page: 1 Spokane Valley Bank code: pk-ref Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 5372 10/28/2011 002894 AALGAARD, SUSAN REFUND 001.237.10. DEPOSIT REFUND: EDGECLIFF PAI 52.00 Total : 52.00 5373 10/28/2011 002895 BURTON, KEVI REFUND 001.237.10. DEPOSIT REFUND: MIRABEAU ME/ 52.00 Total : 52.00 5374 10/28/2011 001549 EMDE SPORTS, LLC REFUND 001.237.10. DEPOSIT REFUND: MIRABEAU PAP 262.00 Total : 262.00 5375 10/28/2011 002896 INLAND EMPIRE MORGAN HORSE, CLUI REFUND 001.237.10. DEPOSIT REFUND: MISSION AREN, 52.00 Total : 52.00 5376 10/28/2011 002897 LANGDON, ROSEMARY REFUND 001.237.10. DEPOSIT REFUND: ROOM 111 52.00 Total : 52.00 5377 10/28/2011 002108 LARTZ,SHERIANN REFUND 001237.10. DEPOSIT REFUND: BROWNS 52.00 Total : 52.00 5378 10/28/2011 002898 NELSON,AMANDA REFUND 001.237.10. DEPOSIT REFUND: MIRABEAU ME/ 52.00 Total : 52.00 5379 10/28/2011 002899 PACIFIC CONTRACT&LASER, INSTITUT REFUND 001.237.10. DEPOSIT REFUND:AUDITORIUM 52.00 Total: 52.00 8 Vouchers for bank code: pk-ref Bank total : 626.00 8 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers: 626.00 Page: 1 vchlist Voucher List Page: 1 11/02/2011 3:52:25PM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 3729 11/4/2011 000048 VANTAGE TRANSFER AGENTS,401A PLAN Ben40827 001.231.14. 401A:Payment 21,145.83 Total: 21,145.83 3730 11/4/2011 000682 EFTPS Ben40829 001.231.11, FEDERAL TAXES:Payment 28,690.26 Total: 28,690.26 3731 11/4/2011 000145 VANTAGEPOINT TRANSFER AGENTS,457 PLF Ben40831 001.231.18. 457 DEFERRED COMPENSATION:Payn 4,849.54 Total: 4,849.54 3732 11/4/2011 000162 VANTAGE TRANSFER AGENTS,401A EXEC PL Ben40833 001.231.14. 401 EXEC PLAN:Payment 1,026.67 Total: 1,026.67 3745 11/4/2011 000682 EFTPS Ben40837 001.231.13. FEDERAL TAXES:Payment 996.58 Total: 996.58 24296 11/4/2011 000120 AWC Ben40817 303.231.16. HEALTH PLANS:Payment 101,012.61 Ben40835 001.231.16. HEALTH PLANS(COUNCIL):Payment 5,933.78 Total: 106,946.39 24297 11/4/2011 000165 DEPT OF RETIREMENT SYSTEMS Ben40819 001.231.15. PERS:Payment 52,127.90 Total: 52,127.90 24298 11/4/2011 002227 IDAHO TAX COMMISSION Ben40821 001.231.50. IDAHO STATE TAX BASE:Payment 1,342.82 Total: 1,342.82 24299 11/4/2011 000699 WA COUNCILCO/CITY EMPLOYEES Ben40823 001.231.21. UNION DUES:Payment 2,215.25 Total: 2,215.25 24300 11/4/2011 002574 WASHINGTON TRUST BANK Ben40825 001.231.20. BERG20110-02-03952-4:Payment 833.30 Total: 833.30 10 Vouchers for bank code: apbank Bank total: 220,174.54 10 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers: 220,174.54 Page: 1 vchlist 11/04/2011 1:43:49PM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: 1 Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor 24301 11/4/2011 000918 BLUE RIBBON LINEN SUPPLY INC 24302 11/4/2011 000143 CITY OF SPOKANE 24303 11/4/2011 001169 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY 24304 11/4/2011 000326 CONSOLIDATED IRRIGATION#19 24305 11/4/2011 002889 DOVIA OF THE INLAND NW 24306 11/4/2011 000278 DRISKELL, CARY 24307 11/4/2011 000246 EAST SPOKANE WATER DIST#1 24308 11/4/2011 000007 G RA I N G E R 24309 11/4/2011 000741 HONEY BUCKETS 24310 11/4/2011 000715 HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 24311 11/4/2011 000070 INLAND POWER&LIGHT CO Invoice 9270508 S0019784 October 2011 November 2011 October 2011 October 2011 2011 Expenses October 2011 Sept 2011 9648903301 9659453956 9659453964 1-362549 October 2011 94202 FundlDept 001.076.305 001.076.305 101.042.000 001.013.015 001.076.300 101.042.000 001.076.304 001.013.015 101.042.000 001.076.300 001.076.305 001.076.305 001.076.305 001.076.300 001.090.000 101.042.000 Description/Account Amount LINEN SERVICE AND SUPPLY AT CI SUPPLIES AT CENTERPLACE Total : TRANSFER STATION: PW Total : PETTY CASH:9773/74115, 10002141: Total : UTILITIES: PARKS UTILITIES: PW Total : MEMBERSHIP FOR KAREN CLARK- Total : EXPENSE REIMBUREMENT Total : WATER CHARGES: PW WATER CHARGES: EDGECLIFF PAI Total : SUPPLIES FOR CENTERPLACE SUPPLIES FOR CENTERPLACE SUPPLIES FOR CENTERPLACE Total : HONEY BUCKET RENTAL: PARKS Total : SUPPLIES AT CITY HALL Total : 143.23 27.18 170.41 56.75 56.75 41.01 41.01 427.82 185.31 613.13 35.00 35.00 1,740.48 1,740.4.8 899.61 881.16 1,780.77 20.74 53.58 52.81 127.13 154.00 154.00 221.10 221.10 UTILITIES:OCT 2011 PW 255.53 Page: 1 vch l ist 11/04/2011 1:43:49PM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: 2 Bank code: Voucher 24311 24312 24313 24314 24315 24316 24317 24318 24319 24320 24321 24322 apbank Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account 11/4/2011 000070 000070 INLAND POWER&LIGHT CO (Continued) 11/4/2011 001635 ISS FACILITY/EVENT SERVICES 120404 11/4/2011 000252 LOWE'S BUSINESS ACCOUNT October 2011 11/4/2011 000193 NORTHWEST CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC 3rd Qtr 2011 CAM 11/4/2011 000881 OXARC 11/4/2011 000119 PLESE PRINTING 11/4/2011 000415 ROSAUERS 11/4/2011 000324 SPOKANE CO WATER DIST#3 SSQ7521 1330049797 11-140164 11-145912 2-89622 Oct 2011 Oct 2011 11/4/2011 000451 SPOKANE REG SPORTS COMMISSION October 2011 11/4/2011 000406 SPOKANE REGIONAL CVB 11/4/2011 000420 SPOKANE REGIONAL HEALTH DIST 11/4/2011 000273 SRTC 2819 3rd QTR 2011 October 2011 001.076.305 001.076.305 001.090.000 001.076.304 001.076.305 001.076.301 001.058.050 001.076.301 001.076.302 101.042.000 OCTOBER 2011 OPERATING SUPPLIES: CP 3RD QTR CAM CHARGES Total : Total : Total : Total : SUPPLIES FOR CENTERPLACE Total : BUSINESS CARDS Total : SUPPLIES FOR HAUNTED POOL SNACKS FOR CD DEVELOPERS FC SUPPLIES FOR HAUNTED POOL Total : WATER CHARGES: PARKS WATER CHARGES: PW Total : 105.105.002 3RD QTR 2011 LODGING TAX REIM Total : 001.076.000 ADVERTISING DISCOVERY PLAYGF Total : 001.076.300 3RD QTR 2011:WATER TESTING Total : 101.042.000 EMERGENCY FUNDING REQUEST Total : Amount 255.53 7,136.00 7,136.00 447.45 447.45 697.64 697.64 69.12 69.12 113.74 113.74 12.48 66.51 73.53 152.52 211.92 150.86 362.78 40,579.10 40,579.10 400.00 400.00 201.00 201.00 2,895.00 2,895.00 Page: 2 vchlist 1110412011 1:43:49 P M Voucher List Page: 3 Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 24323 11/4/2011 001083 STANDARD PLBG HEATING CONTROLS 30074 001.016.000 SEPTEMBER 2011 MONTHLY MAIN? 537.48 Total : 537.48 24324 11/4/2011 000038 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF SPOKANE 1299257-2681-9 001.076.305 October 2011 739.38 1299258-2681-7 001.016.000 WASTE MGMT: PRECINCT 28527 1299259-2681-5 101.042.000 WASTE MGMT:FINAL: 1ST AVE MAII 16.82 1299260-2681-3 101.042.000 WASTE MGMT: MAINTENANCE FAC 173.79 Total : 1,215.26 24 Vouchers for bank code: apbank Bank total : 60,002.40 24 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers : 60,002.40 I,the undersigned,do certify under penalty of perjury, that the materials have been fumished,the services rendered,or the labor performed as described herein and that the claim is just,due and an unpaid obligation against the City of Spokane Valley,and that 1 am authorized to authenticate and certify said claim. Finance Director Date Mayor Date Council Member Date Page: 3 vchlist 11/04/2011 2:10:34PM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: 1 Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 24325 11/4/2011 001873 ACME CONCRETE PAVING INC 24326 11/4/2011 000197 AIRFACIZ 24327 11/4/2011 001081 ALSCO 24328 11/4/2011 001310 ARROW CONCRETE&ASPHALT 24329 11/4/2011 001012 ASSOC BUSINESS SYSTEMS 24330 11/4/2011 001816 BENTHIN&ASSOCIATES 24331 11/4/2011 001344 BENTLEY SYSTEMS INC 24332 11/4/2011 000796 BUDINGER&ASSOC INC 24333 11/4/2011 002562 CD'A METALS 24334 11/4/2011 002837 CENTRAL PRE-MIX CONCRETE CO 24335 11/4/2011 000571 CODE PUBLISHING CO 24336 11/4/2011 001888 COMCAST Pay App#2 57626 LSPO1048595 97032 97920 517179 517298 1807 47417729 L11083-4 385105 13-1625028 39279 November 2011 Fund/Dept 303.303.113 001.018.016 001.058.057 101.042.000 001.032.000 001.013.015 001.058.050 402.402.000 001.032.000 402.402.000 101.042.000 101.042.000 001.013.000 001.090.000 Description/Account 0113 INDIANA SULLIVAN INTERSEC BACKGROUND CHECKS:HR FLOOR MATS: BUILDING Total : Total : Total : STREET MAJNT SUPPLIES STREET MA1NT SUPPLIES Total : COPIER COSTS: LEGAL COPIER COSTS: CD SPVW CONTRACT#10-027 J Total : Amount 393,223.58 393,223.58 20.00 20.00 33.22 33.22 25.90 42.32 68.22 153.86 256.53 410.39 1,384.00 Total : 1,384.00 SOFTWARE SUBSCRIPTION: PW Total : Total : Total : Total : Total: SIEVE ANALYSIS SUPPLIES:PW SUPPLIES: PW MUNICIPAL CODE UPDATE 521.76 521.76 100.00 100.00 188.59 188.59 635.90 635.90 206.96 206.96 HIGH SPEED INTERNET: CITY HALT 108.95 Page: 1 vchlist 11/04/2011 2:10:34PM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: 2 Bank code: Voucher 24336 24337 24338 24339 24340 24341 24342 24343 apbank Date Vendor Invoice FundlDept Description/Account 11/4/2011 001888 001888 COMCAST 11/4/2011 000508 CONOCOPHILLIPS FLEET 11/4/2011 001880 CROWN WEST REALTY LLC 11/4/2011 000683 DAVID EVANS&ASSOCIATES 11/4/2011 002604 DELL FINANCIAL SERVICES LLC 11/4/2011 000734 DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION 11/4/2011 001232 FASTENAL CO PURCHASING 11/4/2011 002507 FASTENERS, INC 24344 11/4/2011 001447 FREE PRESS PUBLISHING INC 24345 24346 11/4/2011 000007 GRAINGER 11/4/2011 002568 GRANICUS INC (Continued) 27611071 001.058.057 00000030 101.042.000 310405 001.058.055 310671 101.041000 75244310 001.090.000 RE-313-ATB11011061 101.042.000 RE-313-ATB11011065 101.042.000 IDLEW78400 101.042.000 53169973.001 101.042.000 53175504.001 101.042.000 53176355.001 101.042.000 37011 37072 37073 37074 9657310331 9666148912 402.402.000 001.013.000 001.013.015 001.058.056 Total OCTOBER 2011 FLEET FUEL BILL Total : MAINTENENCE CHARGES: MAINT Total : SURVEYING SERVICES 2011 TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SERI, Total : LEASE CONTRACT Total : STATE ROUTE ROADWAY MAINT SIGNAL&ILLUMINATION MAIN Total : SUPPLIES: POW SUPPLI ES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES LEGAL PUBLICATION LEGAL PUBLICATION LEGAL PUBLICATION LEGAL PUBLICATION Total : Total : Total : 101.042.000 SUPPLIES 502.502.000 VEHICLE SUPPLES:SAFETY&EME Total : 30296 001.090.000 BROADCASTING SERVICES Amount 108.95 2,489.69 2,489.69 198.04 198.04 316.50 1,131.92 1,448.42 1,087.47 1,087.47 1 0,048.22 5,946.88 15,995.10 18.41 18.41 147.45 49.72 24,92 222.09 41.60 289.00 28.05 59.50 418.15 221.95 235.12 457,07 695.68 Page: 2 vch l ist 11/04/2011 2:10:34PM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: 3 Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 24346 11/4/2011 002568 002568 GRANICUS INC 24347 11/4/2011 000011 GREATER SPOKANE VALLEY 24348 11/4/2011 001728 HP FINANCIAL SERVICES CO 24349 11/4/2011 002518 INLAND PACIFIC HOSE&FITINGS 24350 11/4/2011 000265 JACKSON, MIKE 24351 11/4/2011 002900 LANDMARK TURF&REINBOLD, INC 24352 11/4/2011 002203 NAPA AUTO PARTS 24353 24354 24355 (Continued) 206688 206752 6003-09805/10159/124 462594 NOVMEMBER 2011 24055 201693 433502 435914 437399 674193 675001 676360 11/4/2011 001035 NETWORK DESIGN&MANAGEMENT 20584 11/4/2011 000239 NORTHWEST BUSINESS STAMP INC. 85356 11/4/2011 000652 OFFICE DEPOT INC. 1403254989 581889641001 582507738001 583030091001 584029072001 001.013.000 001.058.050 001.090.000 LEASE PYMT 101.042.000 SUPPLIES: PW 001.013,000 303.303.113 DOT MIX Total: CITYWIDE MEMBERSHIP DUES GOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS TICKET: Total : 695.68 350.00 60.00 410.00 2,519.40 Total : 2,519.40 Total : MONTHLY AUTO ALLOWANCE Total : 101.042.000 101.042.000 101.042.000 101.042.000 101.042.000 101.042.000 101.042.000 SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES Total : Total : 001.090.000 WATCHGUARD)(TM 21 UPGRADE Total : 001.018.016 PICTURE ID BADGES 001.018.016 001.018.016 001.090.000 001.090.000 001.090.000 SUPPLIES: HR SUPPLIES: HR SUPPLIES:BING SUPPLIES:BING SUPPLIES:BING Total : 96.45 96.45 300.00 300.00 42.90 42.90 34.22 62.10 19.54 43.64 82.06 30.79 21.92 294.27 569.84 569.84 39.68 39.68 12.96 -55.39 43.43 521.11 239.12 Page: 3 vchlist 11/04/2011 2:10:34PM Voucher List Page: 4 Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 24355 11/4/2011 000652 OFFICE DEPOT INC. (Continued) 584132087001 001.090.000 SUPPLIES: BING 30.97 Total : 792.20 24356 11/4/2011 002844 ONE CALL CONCEPTS, INC 1109303 001.058.057 LOCATOR TICKET MGMT SYSTEM 73.80 Total : 73.80 24357 11/4/2011 002836 PALADIN DATA SYSTEMS CORP. 33476 001.058.057 CONFIGURATION-IMPLEMENTATIO 6,330.00 Total : 6,330.00 24358 11/4/2011 000119 PLESE PRINTING 1330049864 001.018.014 ENVELOPES: FINANCE 539.49 Total : 539.49 24359 11/4/2011 002193 QSCEND TECHNOLOGES, INC 4726 001.018.013 SOFTWARE MAINT&SUPPORT 317.87 Total : 317.87 24360 11/4/2011 002467 QWICK KURB, INC. 103347 101.042.000 SUPPLIES: PW 818.60 Total : 818.60 24361 11/4/2011 002578 REBUILDING&HARDFACING INC 44624 101.042.000 SNOWPLOW BLADES 5,854.58 Total : 5,854.58 24362 11/4/2011 001071 ROAD PRODUCTS INC. 6665 101.042.000 HYDROBLAST EDGE LINE-S.MAD 6,067.89 6666 101.042.000 PAVEMENT MARKING 867.43 Total : 6,935.32 24363 11/4/2011 002288 SARGENT ENGINEERS INC. 27437 101.042.000 ANCHORS FOR DE-ICING TANKS 2,371.50 Total: 2,371.50 24364 11/4/2011 001941 SEATTLE PUBLIC UTILITIES W0073201 001.058.057 LOCATOR TICKET MGMT SYSTEM 1,900.00 Total : 1,900.00 24365 11/4/2011 000709 SENSKE LAWN&TREE CARE INC. 4366595 402.402.000 2011 EMERGENCY TRAFFIC CONTI 169.57 Total : 169.57 24366 11/4/2011 001140 SPECIAL ASPHALT PRODUCTS INVC056918 001.032.000 SUPPLIES:PW 1,576.15 Total : 1,576.15 Page: 4 vchlist 11/04/2011 2:10:34PM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: 5 Bank code: Voucher 24367 24368 24369 24370 24371 24372 24373 24374 apbank Date Vendor Invoice 11/4/2011 000230 SPOKANE CO AUDITORS OFFICE OCTOBER 2011 SEPTEMBER 2011 11/4/2011 002135 SPRAY CENTER ELECTRONICS, INC 211008 11/4/2011 000311 SPRINT 11/4/2011 000065 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 11/4/2011 000335 TIRE-RAMA 11/4/2011 002254 TOWEY,TOM 11/4/2011 002597 TWISTED PAIR ENTERPRIZES L.L_C 326088106-047 959698810-047 8019823341 8080013367 EXPENSES 10312011 11/4/2011 002188 VALLEY BEST-WAY BLDG SUPPLY 104915 606192 606316 24375 11/4/2011 000087 VERIZON WIRELESS 24376 11/4/2011 000980 WESTERN SYSTEMS 24377 11/4/2011 002839 WIND WIRELESS INC. 1022736899 1022737729 6646770874 0000021088 71368 Fund/Dept 001.058.056 001.058.056 101.042.000 001.090.000 001.058.057 001.058.056 001.058.057 001.011.000 001.090.000 001.032.000 001.032.000 001.032.000 001.016.000 001.016.000 101.042.000 101.042.136 101.042.000 Description/Account Amount RECORDING FEES RECORDING FEES SUPPLIES:PW WAPS FOR LAPTOPS SPRINT CELL PHONES OFFICE SUPPLIES:CD Total : Total : Total : Total : 32810D:OIL CHANGE, ROATERS, B Total : MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT Total: BROADCASTING COUNCIL MTGS C Total : SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES Total : AIR CARD FOR SHERIFF AIR CARDS FOR POLICE DEPARTN WIRELESS DATA CARDS Total : CIP#0136-TRAFFIC SIGNAL LED I Total : 399.00 578.00 977.00 86.50 86.50 122.97 960.66 1,083.63 454.52 454.52 499.77 499.77 108.25 108.25 2,280.00 2,280.00 135.88 13.24 87.94 237.06 43.01 860.24 643.71 1,546.96 264.99 264.99 WIRELESS TELEPHONE/INTERENT 84.95 Page: 5 vch l ist 11/04/2011 2:10:34P M Voucher List Page: 6 Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 24377 11/4/2011 002839 002839 WIND WIRELESS INC. (Continued) Total: 84.95 1031110018 10/31/2011 000001 SPOKANE CO TREASURER 9290200250 001.016.000 LAW ENFORCEMENT 1,282,372.81 Total : 1,282,372.81 1101110142 11/1/2011 002244 AOT PUBLIC SAFETY CORPORATION spkvly-22 001.016.000 CRY WOLF CHARGES:SEPTEMBEF 2,742.36 Total : 2,742.36 55 Vouchers for bank code: apbank Bank total : 1,744,622.11 55 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers: 1,744,622.11 I,the undersigned,do certify under penalty of perjury, that the materials have been fumished,the services rendered,or the labor performed as described herein and that the claim is just,due and an unpaid obligation against the City of Spokane Valley,and that f am authorized to authenticate and certify said claim. Finance Director Date Mayor Date Council Member Date Page: 6 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: 11-15-2011 Department Director Approval : ❑ Item: Check all that apply: ® consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Payroll for Period Ending October 31, 2011 GOVERNING LEGISLATION: PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: BACKGROUND: OPTIONS: RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Budget/Financial impacts: Gross: $ 234,754.93 Benefits: $ 132,574.14 Total payroll $ 367,329.07 STAFF CONTACT: Raba Nimri DRAFT MINUTES City of Spokane Valley City Council Regular Meetings Formal Meeting Format Tuesday, October 11,2011 Mayor Towey called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. Attendance: City Staff Tom Towey,Mayor Mike Jackson,City Manager Gary Schimmels,Deputy Mayor Cary Driskell,City Attorney Bill Gothmann,Councilmember Mark Calhoun,Finance Director Dean Grafos,Councilmember Neil Kersten,Public Works Director Chuck Hafner,Councilmember John Hohman,Community Dev. Director Arne Woodard,Councilmember Mike Stone,Parks&Recreation Director Mike Basinger, Senior Planner ABSENT: Carolbelle Branch,Public Information Officer Brenda Grassel,Councilmember Chris Bainbridge,City Clerk INVOCATION: Pastor Isaac Hebden from The Intersection Church gave the invocation. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Mayor Towey led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL: City Clerk Bainbridge called the roll; all councilmembers were present except Councilmember Grassel. It was moved by Councilmember Grafos, seconded and unanimously agreed to excuse Councilmember Grassel from tonight's meeting. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: It was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels, seconded and unanimously agreed to approve the amended agenda. INTRODUCTION OF SPECIAL GUESTS AND PRESENTATIONS: In acknowledgement of LDS Day of Service, Mayor Towey read a letter dated September 27 to Mark Spear, Chair of the Day of Service Committee, from Michael Stone, Director of Spokane Valley Parks and Recreation, commending and thanking the committee and all the volunteers for developing, implementing and performing a day of service to the City of Spokane Valley;and thanking Mr. Spear and the hundreds of volunteers from the Spokane East Stake of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, St. Mary's Catholic Parish, and the Episcopal Church of the Resurrection as they worked to beautify our parks; and also thanking Duane Anderson and his crew for re-roofmg the A-Frame at Valley Mission Park. After Mayor Towey read the letter, Parks and Recreation Director Stone thanked the volunteers for their hard work, and mentioned how they hauled away outdated gravel at the playgrounds and hauled in the wood-fiber "carpet" which is now deemed a better and safer surface for playgrounds. Mr. Stone introduced Mr. Spear who also acknowledged and thanked the several hundred volunteers, and said that they hope their work inspires others to do likewise. COMMITTEE,BOARD,LIAISON SUMMARY REPORTS: Councilmember Woodard said he attended the Association of Washington Cities' (AWC) meeting last week. Councilmember Gothmann: reported he attended the SNAP meeting and that they are getting started on their $1.8 million capital campaign to purchase their current headquarters; went to the Government Affairs Meeting where Larry Crowder from our airport spoke, and that it appears Los Angeles is underserved from our area so they're working on a grant and local match for their project to attract Council Regular Meeting 10-11-2011 Page 1 of 8 Approved by Council: DRAFT Boeing; attended the AWC Regional meeting; attended a financial access meeting, which is part of SNAP,as they work to partner with another group to work on loans to establish businesses. Councilmember Grafos: said he participated in the City's finance committee meeting, and as Deputy Mayor Schimmels was unable to attend, they did not discuss a great deal but did discuss the ballot measure on the SCRAPS facility, and he mentioned that the City of Spokane Valley supports the ballot measure but would not support subsidizing the balance of any other jurisdictions. City Manager Jackson said that issue is also on tonight's agenda for discussion with full council. Deputy Mayor Schimmels: said he attended the AWC meeting; met with the Solid Waste Liaison Board where they discussed rate increases on garbage rates; and attended an open house on Park Road projects. Councilmember Hafner: said he also attended the Park Road dedication;went to the AWC meeting where they discussed some of the issues surrounding the State's budget, and said that Spokane Valley's budget is in great shape and is one of the few cities in the black, and he thanked City Manager Jackson and staff for providing the services in a financially prudent manner. MAYOR'S REPORT: Mayor Towey reported that he attended the Park Road community input project, and he thanked staff for being available to the community; said he went to the Special Olympics Breakfast of Champions fundraiser; attended the City's Finance Committee meeting; went to the AWC workshop and said he got a good idea of what the AWC legislative agenda will be for this session; that he attended a Wastewater Policy Advisory Board meeting where they proposed three different scenarios for sewer rates for 2012, and said that information will be included in a future council packet, adding that another meeting is planned for November 3 and at that time, he and Deputy Mayor Schimmels will bring back input from that council on our council's recommendations concerning the three scenarios; mentioned we received a Well-City Award for 2011 which means that our city receives a 2%premium discount and said that could mean a savings as much as much as $15,000 depending on the number of employees over the years and how they insure family members. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Mayor Towey invited general public comments. 1. Steve Robinson, President of Spokane Rock Products, PO Box 3808 Spokane, 99220: he said their corporate headquarters and asphalt facilities are located within our city limits; he asked that council entertain a motion concerning opening up the 2012 street maintenance to competitive bidding; he said five years ago the city elected to go to competitive bidding on the street maintenance instead of having Spokane County do it; he said there were two bidders: his company and a company out of Idaho; he said the bids were close but the Idaho company was granted the contract; he said the base bid was from the Idaho company, and each year for the four subsequent years,the option in the contract allows the city and the Idaho company, if they agree, to re-negotiate the rates and go forward for another year; and said the original contract allowed that for six consecutive years; he said there is nothing in the contract requiring the City of Spokane Valley continue with the subsequent year's contract; he said his company's site is located within the city limits of Spokane Valley and the Idaho contract is in Idaho; he said the contract is built around labor rates and equipment rents and product prices; and since there would be longer trips to Idaho, there would be higher costs; he said during the last few years, the bids have been coming in very competitively and the actual contracts typically come in significantly below engineer's estimates; he also said the money spent on the roads is being sent to Idaho and we should be giving an opportunity for those jobs and monies to stay in Washington; and he said the cities of Post Falls, Coeur d'Alene and Rathdrum would not do that; nor would Kootenai County or the State of Idaho. Mr. Robinson said there is a specific state statute that requires work like that to be done by contractors who have 95% of the employees working on those projects as Idaho residents; and he asked council to give the opportunity for competitive bidding to allow City of Spokane Valley citizens to get those jobs. Mayor Towey asked when that contract expires and Mr. Jackson said he would have to research that information. Councilmember Hafner asked how many people would be put to work if those jobs were Council Regular Meeting 10-11-2011 Page 2 of 8 Approved by Council: DRAFT done within the City of Spokane Valley. Mr. Robinson said for every million dollars that are spent, 60 jobs are created in construction, and said typically, there are ten people to a crew. Councilmember Gothmann said he believes Washington state law requires that bids be awarded to the lowest bidder regardless of where they are from,and City Manager Jackson confirmed that statement. Mr. Jackson said staff and council have had previous discussions on the contracting of jobs, and it is fairly complex, but staff can go back over the bidding laws if that is Council's desire. 2. Ron Jacobson, 2601 N Barker Rd: said he resides at River Rose Village; that he is from AMMO, Association of Manufactured Homeowners; and said he noticed a clause at the bottom of their lease agreement which puts the decision making in the hands of the owner concerning land use or selling the property, or closing the manufactured community as required by law, which he said he believes to be a year; and he read from the agreement mentioned; and he mentioned the lack of security in the use of the land and keeping the manufactured and mobile home owners secure in their homes on the rented land. 3. Ishbell Dickens, Executive Director of the National Association of Manufactured Homeowners: she explained that she helped the AMHO form in 2007; and she encouraged council to adopt a mobile home park zone to protect the investment of the homeowners who own their manufactured home but rent the land under them; she noted that the Growth Management Act requires jurisdictions to provide affordable housing and to include a diverse mix of housing types and to include low income housing; she said Spokane Valley currently has an unmet need of more than 3,000 housing units and the loss of 1100 manufactured homes would greatly exacerbate that situation, adding that a mobile home park zone would help the city in accomplishing the goal of meeting affordable housing; she said she understands property rights are important; and said other jurisdictions have enacted ordinances to provide mobile home park zones; she said the 1100 plus homeowners live, work and play in Spokane Valley and said she doesn't know if any of the community owners actually live within the city limits of Spokane Valley; and she urged Council to consider putting mobile park zoning on the comprehensive amendment plan for this year. Councilmember Gothmann asked if she has a model mobile home ordinance, and she replied she does, and explained that she provided the Lynnwood and Tumwater cities ordinances to the City Manager earlier today. City Manager Jackson said he will distribute those to council. 4. Jack Bean, 11717 East 25th Avenue: he spoke concerning car clubs in the area trying to have their shows at various parks and of his frustration with being met with "nothing but objections;" said he hears the shows generate too much noise, too much traffic, there are sprinkler head problems, and it kills the grass; said there are about seventy clubs in the Inland Northwest; that for their shows in the past, they always clean up the area after their event; said they are taxpayers and spend money in this community but feel they are being treated like second-class citizens; said it is not right or fair and he asked council to look into this situation, or meet with the club clubs, or whatever it takes; said they were told they could not hold their car shows at Clark Park in Spokane. 5. Roland Fox: said he is with the manufactured home group; said he's 80 years old and if he were suddenly told he had a year's notice to move,it would create a hardship on him and his wife; said he used to own thirty-six mobile homes in a park as part of his retirement program and said if those parks changed ownership and he was required to sell all those homes it would be a hardship; that the property owner who owns the land has no rights to choose who buys the land; and if a new owner wants to, they can decide to change the use of the land; he said they are all taxpayers and all vote; he said expenses like garbage, sewer, electricity and phone are increasing but the average household income declined by 7%; and citizens are being asked to pay more expenses with less money;and said it doesn't make sense. 6. Duane Murphy, E 4924 Willard Road, Colbert, Wa.: said he is the President and CEO of the Inland NW Car Club Council; that they started in 1985 with about five car clubs, and have now expanded to about 70 clubs; that they are all nonprofit and family oriented; that they formerly held car shows in Council Regular Meeting 10-11-2011 Page 3 of 8 Approved by Council: DRAFT Spokane City parks and were asked to leave for no reason; so they moved to Millwood and Deer Park and were welcomed by those entities as the car shows generate revenue; that they are good stewards of parks and take care and pick up and clean up to make sure the park is in good shape after their event; and he asked Council to sit down with the Parks Department so the car clubs can have a little use of the parks. 7. Martin Houser, Past President and current Vice President of the Citizens Alliance for Property Rights: he mentioned the upcoming community meeting concerning shoreline and property rights; said he was at a previous council meeting concerning the shoreline plan; that junk science has no place in putting together a shoreline management plan, which was clearly demonstrated; and said a lot of good- intentioned science is not based on hard facts. 8. Jacquelyn Witham, 3917 N Locust Road: said she is treasurer of the car club counsel; said they choose Mirabeau Park for their show and paid a fee of$425; and since then for each year they paid that same fee but their usage of that park has dramatically decreased; said they were up against some opposition about some of the areas and while they worked with the parks department, even at the day of the show some of the issues were unclear and the staff made it difficult for them to have a show to be proud of; that they wanted to have full use of the park but limits were placed on where they could place the cars; and she questioned why Valleyfest could be able to use the area and pay the same fee, resulting in a much larger area to use;but said with the very limited space in that park,their club went to Deer Park. 1. PUBLIC HEARING: 2012 Budget—Mark Calhoun Mayor Towey opened the hearing at 6:57 p.m., and Finance Director Calhoun said the purpose of tonight's agenda is to consider input from citizens; that the only monetary charge since the preliminary budget is the updated property tax information to provide new construction figures; that we are not proposing or planning to take the 1% increase permitted by statute; that the budget will include a new Aquifer Protection Area fund; the employee count remains unchanged at 87.25 full time equivalent employees; and the 2012 operating expenditure increases have been held at or below 1% over 2011; he mentioned ballot initiative 1183 concerning privatization of the distribution and retail sale of liquor and said it should have no impact on the liquor excise tax we receive; he explained some of the significant sources of revenues, mentioned the prioritization of capital projects and the history of CPI (Consumer Price Index) that measures consumer inflation, including the CPI increase average for social security. Mayor Towey invited public comment; no comments were offered and Mayor Towey closed the public hearing at 7:14 p.m. Councilmember Grafos indicated his desire to discuss prioritizing projects and infrastructure projects for the 2012 budget, and that he would like to see the stormwater project on Sprague Avenue as the top priority;and said he wanted to see the designs for entry signs move forward as well; and he asked if Council agreed with his prioritization. Councilmember Woodard agreed; but Councilmember Gothmann questioned the timing, as he said he felt the first thing to do in that regard would be to obtain cost estimates and recommendations from City Manager Jackson, then ask Mr. Jackson to report back to council. Mr. Jackson said originally the stormwater project on Sprague was the highest priority; then Council asked staff to try to put together a plan of all the projects so they would be prioritized; and he said the Public Works Department has been working on that, but with the current workload, that has not yet been accomplished; and said ideally, staff would present all the projects to Council for council's selection and prioritization; and said he'll see if it will be possible to have a review of stormwater projects at or prior to the first reading of the ordinance adopting the budget; and said there is no problem on continuing to work on this after budget adoption, and the projects could be included as an amendment,which can be done at any time;or if council wants to choose that project as the top project and include it in the budget, staff can do that as well. Mayor Towey indicated a top priority would be the Sullivan Bridge,but that he realizes that priorities shift and council can amend the budget at any time; and feels after Sullivan Bridge, the stormwater project would be the top priority; and all priorities can be addressed after they determine how best to address the issue of the Sullivan Bridge. Councilmember Grafos said he feels council could possibly do both. Mr. Jackson said he is uncertain how much of the Council Regular Meeting 10-11-2011 Page 4 of 8 Approved by Council: DRAFT repairs of the bridge can be accomplished with using the APA (Aquifer Protection Area) funds, as the regulations on using those funds are very specific; and said he will at least have an update for council prior to the first reading. Councilmember Hafner added that the outcome of the Sprague Ballot issue might also have an effect on how these projects are prioritized. 2. CONSENT AGENDA: Consists of items considered routine which are approved as a group. Any member of Council may ask that an item be removed from the Consent Agenda to be considered separately. a.Approval of the following claim vouchers: VOUCHER LIST DATE VOUCHER NUMBERS: TOTAL AMOUNT 08-21-2011 3683-3686 $55,065.16 09-22-2011 23940-23989 $944,972.70 09-23-2011 23990-24003 $231,664.76 09-30-2011 24004-24044; 923110042 $79,756.47 09-30-2011 24045-24057 $47,099.68 10-04-2011 5339-5371 (refunds) $4,265.50 GRAND TOTAL $1,362,824.27 b. Approval of Payroll for period ending September 30,2011: $349,449.76 c. Approval of Minutes of September 20,2011 Study Session Format Council Meeting d.Approval of Minutes of September 27,2011 Formal Format,Council Meeting It was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels, seconded and unanimously agreed to approve the consent agenda. NEW BUSINESS: 3. Second Reading Proposed Ordinance 11-013 Amending Spokane Valley Municipal Code Relative to City Treasurer—Cary Driskell After City Clerk Bainbridge read the ordinance title, it was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels and seconded to approve Ordinance 11-013 relating to references to the City finance director/City treasurer in the City Code. City Attorney Driskell explained the item as he had previously, that this is mostly a housekeeping item to keep our code consistent with the actual staff titles. Mayor Towey invited public comment and no comments were offered. Vote by Acclamation: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed: None. Motion carried. 4.First Reading Proposed Ordinance 11-014,Bike/Pedestrian Master Program—Mike Basinger After City Clerk Bainbridge read the ordinance title, it was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels and seconded to advance ordinance 11-014 to a second reading. Senior Planner Basinger explained that changes were made as directed by Council. Mayor Towey invited public comment and no comments were offered. Council discussion included mention by Councilmember Woodard that he is not comfortable with this being in the comp plan as it is not required; and is also not comfortable with the pedestrian part being almost secondary. Councilmember Hafner agreed and asked why it is important to have this included in the comp plan. Senior Planner Basinger explained that it provides for an integrated plan; that it takes the arterial and the bike and pedestrian program and integrates that into one plan; that the community looks to the comprehensive plan as their document; and when Public Works is applying for grants, typically a specific component for a grant consideration is whether this is in the comp plan, that it gives more strength and better chances for the grant; and adds some transparency when in the comp plan versus having it in a plan that sits on a shelf. Councilmember Woodard argued that it would be more difficult to remove since it would be adopted by ordinance and codified; and Councilmember Gothmann said the comp plan is not associated with regulations, but is a plan, and said he feels the comp plan is a logical place to put the bike and pedestrian master program; and it acts as guidelines. City Attorney Driskell said when we adopt something by ordinance it is the law of the city, but that not all ordinances Council Regular Meeting 10-11-2011 Page 5 of 8 Approved by Council: DRAFT are codified, and this would also not be codified. Vote by Acclamation: In Favor:Mayor Towey, Deputy Mayor Schimmels, and Councilmembers Grassel, Grafos and Gothmann. Opposed: Councilmembers Hafner and Woodard. Motion carried. At 7:35 p.m.Mayor Towey called for a ten minute break;and reconvened the meeting at 7:45 p.m. 5.First Reading Proposed Ordinance 11-015,2012 Levy Property Tax-Mark Calhoun After City Clerk Bainbridge read the ordinance title, it was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels and seconded, to advance ordinance 11-015 levying regular property taxes for 2012, to a second reading. Finance Director Calhoun explained that state law requires us to pass an ordinance in order to levy property taxes; and that this ordinance represents no change from the 2010 levy that was collected in 2011. Mayor Towey invited public comment; no comments were offered. Vote by Acclamation: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed:None. Motion carried. 6.First Reading Proposed Ordinance 11-016,2012 tax confirmation—Mark Calhoun After City Clerk Bainbridge read the ordinance title, it was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels and seconded, to advance ordinance 11-016, conforming the 2012 property tax levy, to a second reading. Finance Director Calhoun explained that passage of this ordinance is required by law; and this ordinance confirms the 2012 property tax levy for the City's 2012 budget. Mayor Towey invited public comment; no comments were offered. Vote by Acclamation: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed: None. Motion carried. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Mayor Towey invited general public comments;no comments were offered. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS: Mayor Towey reversed the order for agenda items 7 and 8 in order for guest speaker Mr. Dameworth to speak earlier in the agenda. 8. SRCAA(Clean Air Agency)Indirect Source Rule—Bill Dameworth Mr.William Dameworth,Director of Spokane Regional Clean Air Agency, explained that Board Member Rose Dempsey had asked him to give Council a report on the Indirect Source Rule. Mr. Dameworth explained that the provisions of this rule apply to indirect sources located throughout Spokane County, with actual or projected emissions above a certain tonnage per year, or actual or projected calendar year; with a focus on NOx(nitrogen oxide) emissions above a certain tonnage per year that cause or contribute to a violation of one or more federal state, or local ambient air quality standards, or cause or contribute to an adverse human health effect; and said an indirect source means any facility, building, structure or installation that generates or attracts mobile sources that results in emissions of any air contaminant or toxic air contaminant; and said that supermarkets would not be an indirect source since the definition is mostly directed at a facility where a lot of diesel engines are idling. Mr. Dameworth explained some of how the on-site emissions are calculated and the determination procedure for working with the source to address the issue; as well as public participation, and that once the rule is approved, the indirect source will be required to implement an emissions reduction plan. Mr. Dameworth also mentioned that the rule will likely exempt aircraft,both military and civilian,and defer applicability to sources like railroads until the EPA(Environmental Protection Agency)adopts the rule into the SIP(State Implementation Plan),and he said voluntary agreements are still a possibility instead of a rule, and they are currently working with BNSF(Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad)on a grant. 7.Animal Control Update—Morgan Koudelka Senior Administrative Analyst Koudelka explained that the County decided to place a ballot measure on the November ballot asking voters to fund a lid lift on the County's general property tax levy for the purpose of funding an animal shelter, and if passed, it would increase the regular property tax levy up to Council Regular Meeting 10-11-2011 Page 6 of 8 Approved by Council: DRAFT 5.80 per $1,000 assessed valuation, and would automatically terminate in nine years or less unless reauthorized by public vote. Mr. Koudelka also discussed the August 26, 2011 letter from Mayor Verner to the Board of County Commissioners addressing the annual increases in rates to be paid by the City of Spokane; and explaining that the letter is a "statement of intent" setting forth the general terms of a regional animal control partnership. Mr. Koudelka explained that the letter sets out that if the bond issue is approved on the November election, Spokane City would agree to sell property to the County, subject to specific terms, and that the County would lock in rates the City pays for services, adding that there is no intent by the City of Spokane to have any of the current SCRAPS partner jurisdictions underwrite the cost of Spokane joining the current coalition. Mr.Koudelka said the Board of County Commissioners has no issue with the terms and Mayor Verner took the letter to Spokane County and they agreed to support her position. Mr. Koudelka also discussed the estimated SCRAPS model spreadsheet that includes the City of Spokane, and said total expenses estimated according to the County are under $2.9 million with total revenues estimated at $1.7 million; and after further explaining the figures contained in the spreadsheet, Mr. Koudelka said that it is anticipated we would have a net savings, but the expenses and revenues are projections at this point; and he said the Board of County Commissioners is asking for our support in promoting this effort. There was discussion about the current costs and that the current shelter resides on County land and that they are required to receive reimbursement for any use of their land, and again stressed that the figures are projections and nothing is guaranteed. Mayor Towey mentioned that since the letter expressed by Mayor Verner indicates their intent not to burden other jurisdictions by use of subsidies, he asked if Council wants to express in writing the intent of this council. Councilmember Hafner said he feels further confirmation is needed before proceeding as the figures are projections at this time; and conversation continued concerning keeping the costs fair and consistent and in response to the question of whether to send a letter of support, Council indicated they would like staff to draft a letter of explanation from us to Spokane City and bring the letter back to council for approval. 9. Spokane Valley Fire Department Accreditation—Chief Thompson Chief Thompson explained their recent accreditation process and said that the purpose of the accreditation is to have an assessment performed of every aspect of the Fire Department along with a measurement of how well they deliver services, and of how and where they can improve; he said that the CFAI (Commission on Fire Accreditation International) is the only internationally recognized accreditation process for the Fire Service,that it identifies strength and shortcomings, directs future growth and efforts, and allows for public feedback; and that the payoff is improved delivery of emergency services,proactive public education, and cost effective and comprehensive direction for the future. Council congratulated Chief Thompson and his Department for their continued good work. 10.Bonneville Power Franchise—Cary Driskell City Attorney Driskell explained that this is a first touch to renew the expired Bonneville Power Administration Electrical Transmission Facilities Franchise; that initially this was a franchise between Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) and Spokane County,which was agreed to January 9, 1959, and expired January 9, 2009; and that the City and BPA have been negotiating for quite some time now and said delays occurred for various reasons on both sides,but that the current franchise will continue in place until a new franchise is agreed upon. Mr. Driskell said there is some difference with this franchise and others Council has seen, as this franchise is with the federal government and therefore, local jurisdictions are precluded by federal law from requiring insurance provisions. Mr. Driskell said we will also need to publish a copy of the franchise in the newspaper prior to adoption, at BPA's cost. There were no objections from Council to have staff move this item forward. 11.Advance Agenda Councilmember Grafos said he would like council to have a review of the contracts with the city, like the road maintenance contract Mr. Robinson spoke of earlier, and to see the progression of the contracts and how the services, charges, and amounts changed over the years. Mr. Jackson asked Council if there were Council Regular Meeting 10-11-2011 Page 7 of 8 Approved by Council: DRAFT any objections and none were noted. Mr. Jackson said it will take some time for staff to research that,and that staff can schedule that once the research is completed. 12. School Beacon Grant Opportunity was for information only and was not reported or discussed. EXECUTIVE SESSION: Review Performance of a Public Employee [RCW 42.30.110(1)(g) It was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels, seconded and unanimously agreed to adjourn into executive session for approximately thirty minutes to discuss the review of a public employee, and that no action would be taken upon return to open session. Council adjourned into executive session at 8:51 p.m. At 9:11 p.m. Mayor Towey declared Council out of executive session; it was then moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels, seconded and unanimously agreed to adjourn. The meeting adjourned at approximately 9:12 p.m. ATTEST: Thomas E. Towey,Mayor Christine Bainbridge,City Clerk Council Regular Meeting 10-11-2011 Page 8 of 8 Approved by Council: DRAFT MINUTES SPOKANE VALLEY CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING STUDY SESSION FORMAT Spokane Valley City Hall Council Chambers Spokane Valley,Washington October 18,2011 6:00 p.m. Attendance: Councilmembers Staff Tom Towey,Mayor Mike Jackson,City Manager Gary Schimmels,Deputy Mayor Cary Driskell,City Attorney Bill Gothmann,Councilmember Mark Calhoun,Finance Director Dean Grafos,Councilmember John Hohman Community Dev. Director Brenda Grassel,Councilmember Mike Stone,Parks&Recreation Director Chuck Hafner,Councilmember Neil Kersten,Public Works Director Arne Woodard,Councilmember Scott Kuhta,Planning Manager Lori Barlow, Senior Planner Inga Note,Traffic Engineer Carolbelle Branch,Public Information Officer Chris Bainbridge,City Clerk Mayor Towey called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. 1. 2011 Budget Amendment—Mark Calhoun Finance Director Calhoun explained that this proposed budget amendment reflects changes that have occurred through the normal course of operations and affects several funds; that revenues are proposed to be amended upward for a total of$2,812,681, and expenditures are amended upward $2,901,919. Mr. Calhoun explained the several accompanying spreadsheets and said the largest transfer includes transfer from the 2010 fund balance of 40% in excess of$26 million of carryover funds, and other funds include expenditures to offset the recently acquired shop facility, adding that there are adequate funds available to cover these amendments. Council voiced no objections to staff continuing to move the budget amendment process forward. 2. Gateway Signage and Identity—Mike Stone Parks and Recreation Director Stone said that several months ago he spoke to Council regarding exploring potential signage options for a variety of City uses; and at that time, several sign concepts were viewed by Council. He explained that since then, a citizen's survey was set up to allow citizens to vote on-line for their favorite sign from among six choices. By means of his PowerPoint presentation, Mr. Stone explained the three concepts which received the majority of votes, and said that the large engraved stone sign is the least expensive of those three. One of the key concepts he recommended is that the sign chosen should be the City's sign template so citizens can be comfortable with city facilities and have the sign look consistent. When it comes to maintenance, he explained that all three options would have very low maintenance, and said corten steel is a long lasting material; that the sign might need a little window dressing and that there would be some cost for landscaping, mowing, and irrigation, plus a one-time installation cost, as well as an annual cost for spring and winter start/stop of irrigation; and he recommended turf as one of the simplest lawns to maintain.Mr. Stone said signs could be adopted by community or service groups and they could make it a community-wide project; he estimated $2,500 to $4,000 for those additional costs per sign. Mr. Stone explained that he didn't prepare a map, but got some information from Public Works for areas where these signs might be located; that there are sixteen entries into the city, with two related to state routes; Council Study Session Minutes 10-18-2011 Page 1 of 8 Approved by Council: DRAFT and said not all areas would need a sign, and he deferred to Council for those choices. Mr. Stone said the intent of this discussion is to come back with a recommendation for one of these concepts to adopt as the city template,and once the template is chosen,Mr. Stone said he would fine-tune the cost. Discussion included the suggestion of narrowing this down to the two major entrances, then using green signs at the other areas, and that even the small green welcome and directional signs could use the City's logo. Councilmember Grafos said he liked the engraved stone as it is the least expensive and ties into the signs at Mirabeau Park. Councilmember Hafner suggested the possibility of having some of the business people donate to the project; and said he likes the stone sign but asked about lighting. Mr. Stone said the plan is to get the business and community members involved. Councilmember Grassel said her favorite is Concept #1, the Corten Steel sign with timbers and cobblestone columns; but to take out the planter box and make it concrete on top to alleviate the need for maintenance, and she said that beautification is an important element in drawing businesses, and voiced her concern with the stone sign as the major sign and suggested using that sign at more minor places. Mr. Stone said the results of the survey were that only thirty-seven people voted, with concept #2, Corten Steel sign with cobblestone base, receiving the most votes, twelve out of 37. Councilmember Woodward said he likes concept #1 with the cobblestone columns, and said that perhaps the triangle property would be a good place for that sign. It was also mentioned that #2 is not double-sided since it has a curve. Mayor Towey said he agrees with Councilmember Grassel; that a lot of times the first impression is the most lasting impression and suggested having the best, adding that there are many volunteers in the community who likely would help, that he likes Concept #1 but without the flower planter. It was Council's consensus to go with Concept#1 and to pursue that sign at both the west and east end of the city. Mr. Stone said the planter is not necessary and he will price both options for council's further consideration, as well as price the lighting and other details. 3. Car Shows—Mike Stone Parks and Recreation Director Stone said he hopes to leave Council with the knowledge that we encourage car shows in the parks like we encourage any other event; that there are many challenges regarding reserving parks for all our citizens, that they strive to be consistent with all park patrons, and due to their size and terrain facilities, the parks are limited to types and sizes of activities; that we are stewards of the parks and are responsible to maintain, care for, preserve and protect those resources. Via his PowerPoint presentation, Mr. Stone emphasized that Parks and Recreation strives to support strong community values, and improve livability by providing and promoting quality recreation areas,programs, and facilities, and that the Department's first priority is the general visiting public; that their objective in reserving parks is to promote a diverse range of activities and opportunities, ensure fair and equitable access, and balance the needs of the casual and organized park users, all while protecting and preserving park environments; that to minimize the impacts of events on parks,they have site monitoring, controlled amplified sound, limited vehicle access, and restrict some activities; he said the majority of our parks are not designed to support large scale events as they lack adequate restrooms,parking,water and power, and he mentioned the restrictions of vehicles in parks as per City Code 6.05.070; and said other reasons for restricting activities include potential damage to the park, or the impact one activity would have on other's enjoyment of the park, as well as risk management or public safety considerations; and that his department strives to reduce user conflicts by scheduling reservations in the appropriate spaces and at appropriate times.Mr. Stone explained that the biggest challenges are to preserve and protect the facilities and be consistent with users and their use of parks. He also explained the park reservation policy whereby the Director has authority to create, administer, and enforce a system to govern park reservations; and that they accept reservations beginning the first business day after the first of the year; that application and fees are required; some events require a refundable damage deposit, there is no charge for amplified sound,insurance is required depending on the activities, and a special event permit is also required depending upon the activity. Mr. Stone explained a little about when a special event permit is required, and said the fee for such a permit is $5.00. Director Stone said car shows are unique major events and present several challenges, such as parking cars on the turf and possible damage; time for turf Council Study Session Minutes 10-18-2011 Page 2 of 8 Approved by Council: DRAFT to recover;turning off irrigation systems days in advance,normally during the hottest months of the year; safety conflicts between cars and park users; disruption of normal park use; and elimination of other reservations during a show. Mr. Stone said up to four car shows per year are permitted at Mirabeau Meadows, and that parking on the turf is restricted to the areas shown on his accompanying map because of ongoing turf, soil and drainage issues. Discussion included mention that most car shows are nonprofit; that there are 60 to 75 car clubs in the area; mention by Mr. Stone that if the clubs were to use the Fairgrounds, they would pay considerably more than what we charge; that our charge for a ten-hour show would be $168 as the $257 damage deposit is refundable, and Mr. Stone mentioned the idea of finding a venue and having something built to handle car shows. Councilmember Grafos distributed copies and read a portion of a handout entitled "Inland Northwest Car Club Council History;"and said he met with members of some of the clubs;that it is not the matter of the fees but rather an issue of being consistent; that it appears we have overcome a lot of the issues in dealing with Valleyfest as they had cars and trucks in certain areas which apparently didn't hurt the turf, and he asked Mr. Stone about the differences between Valleyfest and the car shows. Mr. Stone explained that he appreciates the comments about consistency;he said Valleyfest is once a year and at the end of the season; that he doesn't feel car shows are the same as Valleyfest; that Valleyfest is the one community event, a city-sponsored event, and our policy allows us some exceptions,just as we allow some exceptions for other activities such as SCOPE activities; that he is open to council direction; and reiterated that we permit cars shows, but limit them to four times a year. Councilmember Grafos suggested staff reach out to the car clubs as he feels it would have a big impact on their perception; and Mr. Stone agreed and said that opportunity didn't present itself this year, and agreed with the need for discussion between staff and car show representatives. Mr. Grafos said he would get contact information for Mr. Stone. There was also some discussion about allowing the car shows to book a date before the first of each year, and of Mr. Stone's concern with keeping the policy consistent for everyone, including family reunions,weddings,and other events,as once an event is booked,it is difficult to change. 4. Old Milwaukee Right-of-way—Neil Kersten/Mike Stone Public Works Director Kersten explained that at the joint meeting with the Board of County Commissioners,there was a suggestion for a bike trail down the Old Milwaukee right-of-way,and that we agreed to start with an initial discussion on how council wants to proceed with that idea; he said Mr. Jackson talked to representatives from the STA(Spokane Transit Authority)and they appear to be open to the suggestion; that they want to keep it open for a future potential light rail or some other multi-modal transportation corridor, but they are open to the use as a bike lane. Mr. Kersten said some things to keep in mind as the discussion proceeds, is the public process, funding level, timelines and project scope, and said once staff gets a feel for council's ideas on how to fund the project, we can start the public participation process. Mr.Kersten said some day the right-of-way could change and be used for light rail, but nothing is definitive at this point; he said some trails are not as high-end and permanent as others;that perhaps we could get some donations from contractors or could pursue grant funding,but that staff seeks council feedback on how to fund this as high, medium, or low in terms of quality of the project. Councilmember Gothmann mentioned the $8,000 in the trail fund and Mr. Kersten said that wouldn't get us very far, which led to discussion on the scope of the project, whether a bike, walk or other trail, and how far to take the trail. Mr. Jackson said he had one meeting with STA and Commissioner Richard in a more casual setting,and said staff has not yet talked to Liberty Lake. Director Stone said he too seeks feedback from council; that they can just create trailheads, or include benches,drinking fountains, or other amenities. Councilmember Grafos said he would like to see a shared use path, something simple and low cost, perhaps asphalt with some vegetation, and to possibly clean up the areas along the sides. Mr. Kersten said he is working with Bob Brueggeman from the County concerning the area at University-City, to clean it up and perhaps create a small park area; it was suggested to do this project in phases starting at University-City and perhaps go to Pines, and eventually tie it all the way to Liberty Lake and make a loop over to the Centennial Trail. Grant money for Millwood Council Study Session Minutes 10-18-2011 Page 3 of 8 Approved by Council: DRAFT Trail was mentioned and Mr. Kersten said those funds can only be used on that trail, but that staff could look grant possibilities, and he mentioned the idea of including this in the comprehensive plan which would lend for greater grant opportunities; he said the path could be just gravel at first with some small pocket parks or such things as Frisbee golf;and said one of the big issues is working to clean up the right- of-way of the dead vegetation and weeds. Mr. Stone said that this would also be another opportunity for a project for volunteer service groups,as having service clubs clean up and haul away the debris would be a huge cost savings. Mr. Kersten said the Geiger Crews cleaning up would also be a very low cost. Mayor Towey reminded everyone not to get ahead of ourselves as the last time we did this, we forgot that the County owns the land;he said we have to partner with STA,the County, and Liberty Lake if we're going to move forward; and he said he likes the idea of considering this project in increments. Mr. Kersten said we would not move ahead until we have the land, whether by easement or other mechanism; but that tonight is an opportunity for discussion of general ideas;that staff can bring back options for paving such as gravel or other materials, and show the cost per-mile; that the first goal is to move ahead and get the agreement; to keep the process public and get people's reactions on what kind of trail they would like. Mayor Towey agreed with the idea of bringing in the public at the beginning and to continue inviting them throughout the process. Mr.Kersten said this issue will be before Council several times,but the first goal is to bring forth the easement on the use of the right-of-way. Public Works Director Kersten also mentioned that now that the decision has been made not to build anything down that right-of-way, the environmental assessment needs to be completed and to have a meeting or two to finalize the decision if the preferred way is a no-build alternative; and by completing the environmental study, we hopefully won't have to pay back the federal funds; and said he is sensing this is the direction Council would like; and that the corridor could be used for transit, bike and other transportation modes and that it makes sense to keep it simple; and if the trail gets used for twenty or thirty years and then gets worn out, that would still be acceptable. Mr. Jackson said that based on conversations with the STA and Board of County Commissioners, it is likely we'll come up with a plan where all parties would have to remain flexible; and said it would be difficult to project into the future for use of that area; that there would be some amount of risk in placing a trail now that might someday be part of a high traffic corridor,but such might not occur for twenty years or more,or never; and said we all have to accept a little bit of the unknown so we can use it now. Council concurred. Mayor Towey called for a ten-minute recess at 7:40 p.m.,and reconvened the meeting at 7:50 p.m. 5. School Beacon Grant Opportunity- Inga Note Senior Traffic Engineer Note explained that the Washington Traffic Safety Commission has issued a Request for Proposals for School Zone Flashing Beacon projects, that applications are due November 1 and speed studies must be completed prior to submitting the application; and this time they have expanded the funding opportunities to middle schools; she said staff spoke with the school districts and the police department and based on the criteria listed in the October 18, 2011 Request for Council Action form, they have ranked the schools as shown, except staff is not recommending the Kindergarten Center since they only have one walker. Ms.Note said the funding is usually $7,500 per zone, and it costs about $6,000 per zone to install the beacons. Council had no objection for staff moving forward with the four listed schools of Evergreen Middle School, East Valley Middle School, Bowdish Middle School, and McDonald Elementary School. 6. Speed Limits—Inga Note Traffic Engineer Note explained that a draft resolution to change the Indiana Avenue speed limits from 25 to 35 was before Council July 26, 2011, and the motion to approve the resolution did not pass. She explained that Council requested staff to bring the resolution back for further discussion, and that Council also requested information on other speed limit concerns. As indicated on the table contained in Ms. Note's Request for Council Action Form, she went over the concerns on the various streets;and explained that some cities adopted a "statutory speed limit" for all arterial streets and that if council chose, could Council Study Session Minutes 10-18-2011 Page 4 of 8 Approved by Council: DRAFT adopt a similar resolution to make the speed limit consistent on all major arterials, with speed limits increased on select arterials based on an engineering and traffic study; and said that the impact of this would mean raising the speed limit from 25 to 30 on several residential arterials, such as 24"', Adams, Thierman, 4"', parts of 8th Conklin, Vista, Euclid, and a few others. Councilmember Woodard said he would like to address Indiana; that he met with a lot of people concerning that section of the road and an appropriate compromise would be 35 on Indiana to the point where it splits into the two, one-ways, and then 30, and said the neighbors out there seem to think that would work. Councilmember Grassel said she feels that is a good compromise since there is a change in the road pattern at that point. Councilmember Woodard also stated his preference for a statutory speed limit to make the speeds more uniform, but said that issue could be addressed later. Deputy Mayor Schimmels disagreed with Councilmember Woodard's suggestion to lower the speed limits and said the speed limits should not be lowered unless we have congestion or a history of accidents, neither of which we have on that roadway; he said Sullivan to Barker has very little traffic nor very many accidents and feels the limit should be higher. In response to question, Chief VanLeuven said they have been monitoring the speeds on Indiana Parkway and issued a number of citations for excessive speed, and said if it were lowered to 25, they would not have the time or the resources to maintain that speed enforcement; and said in his investigation, officers feel 35 would be reasonable to enforce and have traffic move safely through. Chief VanLeuven also stated that safety depends on location and accidents can be caused by speed,inattention, or visibility. There was further discussion on various speed limits for different types of streets, with council deciding to keep tonight's focus on Indiana and to get other data for a more in-depth discussion later. Public Works Director Kersten agreed staff can bring back a general discussion on speed limits, and he mentioned the rules and statutes accompanying the council packet material, and for the next action, staff will bring back just the original motion. Engineer Note stated that a recent speed study was done on Flora, from Mission to Barker,and once those results are received, she will bring that back to council as well. 7. Solid Waste Update—Neil Kersten Public Works Director Kersten said as a quick update, Commissioner French moved the notification date for joining the alliance from October 3 to January 16,2012; that thus far no community has opted out but it appears each jurisdiction has the issue under consideration; that in speaking to Mr.French,the feeling is he will get the alliance group back together to discuss its direction. Deputy Mayor Schimmels said he feels there likely won't be any change, that garbage and tipping fees could increase after the first of the year, but the SWAC (Solid Waste Advisory Council) is an advisory group and the Board of County Commissioners bears the weight of the decision. Mayor Towey asked about our proposal for a three-year extension, and City Attorney said he spoke with both entities, and the County was putting the three-year extension on their agenda for today, and said he will check in the morning to see if that was adopted; and that the City of Spokane is scheduled to put the issue on their agenda either next week or the following week; and said it is moving forward; and that our plan is to get this in front of council for motion consideration soon; that the entities have also agreed to take out the issue of new bonds extending the life of the agreement, and said the anticipated date for paying of the bonds is the first of December, which would signify the end of the agreement. Staff said they will keep council appraised. 8. Community Development Block Grant(CDBG)Project Ideas—Scott Kuhta/Neil Kersten Planning Manager Kuhta said that each year the federal Depaitiuent of Housing and Urban Development provides about $1.5 million in CDBG entitlement funding to Spokane County; that in 2008 Spokane County agreed to amend the CDBG funding policies and established a 20% set-aside of the County's annual federal appropriation for our city's infrastructure projects; but due to uncertainty in how much the next federal allotment will be, the County anticipates Spokane Valley's share will be between $225,000 and $310,000. Mr. Kuhta said applications are due in November and a public hearing on the City's potential projects is scheduled for October 25. Mr. Kuhta said he met with Public Works staff to identify some projects which have to meet the high priority ranking in the CDBG consolidated plan, like streets, sewers and water systems, and since we don't provide water or sewer, our focus is on streets, and the identified projects are the Sprague Avenue Resurfacing Project, from Havana to Fancher; and the ADA Council Study Session Minutes 10-18-2011 Page 5 of 8 Approved by Council: DRAFT Sidewalk improvements. Mr. Kuhta also explained that the projects must be within those areas designated as low-income on the map; he said the estimated cost for the Sprague Avenue project far exceeds our city's projected share of funds. Mr. Kersten said concerning the eastbound lanes from Havana to Fancher, this would pave as far as they could, then we could use city money to pave the rest, adding that the road needs the repair work. It was noted the funding would be available in January, and that this item is scheduled as a motion and a public hearing for next week. 9. Code Compliance Report—John Hohman Community Development Director Hohman introduced Code Compliance Officers Chris Berg and Bill Schultz, who then explained the City's code compliance program including processes, types of complaints, extreme cases, abatements, and possible future code amendments. Mr. Hohman said we are currently complaint driven, but that is also open for discussion and council input. Staff's PowerPoint included an overview of how they assist other departments as well as outside agencies, a comparison of 2010 and 2011 code violations, how the process works, the types of complaints and violations, and several before and after photos of past problems and abatements. Weed control was also mentioned with Mr. Hohman stating that he feels there are opportunities to improve the way we do business and streamline the process and that he hopes for council input into these issues, and for some future code amendments as well,and said his staff works with Mr. Driskell to address some of the proposed language, and to address legal mitigation and abatement of some of these issues. Mayor Towey mentioned that it appears some remedies take two years or more and asked if there is a way to speed up that process. Mr. Hohman said he is aware of several ongoing cases and they are trying to remedy some with code amendments; but that it takes time to get permissions to enter properties and in some cases, takes a court order to allow staff or a cleanup crew onto private property. Deputy Mayor Schimmels said within the solid waste system administered by the City of Spokane, they claim that possibly last year they cleaned up out here in our city limits to the "tune of around $700,000;" and said he mentioned that earlier tonight to Mr. Berg who was not aware of it, but Deputy Mayor Schimmels said that is part of their money they have for that purpose; and evidentially to staff's knowledge,nothing has ever come forth from the city of Spokane crews; and Mr. Hohman said he also is not aware of that issue,but said staff can research that and report back at a future meeting. At approximately 9:00 p.m., it was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels and seconded to extend the meeting an hour. Vote by Acclamation: In Favor: Mayor Towey, Deputy Mayor Schimmels, and Councilmembers Grassel, Grafos, and Gothmann. Opposed: Councilmember Hafner and Woodard. Motion carried. 10. Sign Code Review—John Hohman Community Development Director Hohman said staff wanted to present council with an update on the expansion of the discussion held August 15, which compared our sign code to neighboring jurisdictions, and to include Spokane County in those comparisons, and added that staff is still gathering facts before they go back through the Planning Commission process, and then return again to Council; and that staff is only looking for discussion tonight and not action. Senior Planner Barlow explained the summary conclusions highlighted on page two of the accompanying memo; said she also compared landscaping requirements for the base of freestanding signs, and said the Planning Commission continues work on the code text amendment to eliminate that requirement. Ms. Barlow said at the last council discussion, council identified a list of revisions, and staff seeks direction on how to proceed now, whether to add more to the list or request more information,and she acknowledged that sandwich boards are on the list as well. Director Hohman said the proposed direction staff seeks from council, is whether council concurs with staff's proposal to eliminate the permit requirement for those and provide more guidance, such as signs should not block a sidewalk or create a visibility problem, and to be more prescriptive instead of requiring a permit. Councilmember Hafner added that he also wants the regulations to fit locally, and to use common sense in explaining the regulations and guidelines. Mr. Hohman agreed and said we can Council Study Session Minutes 10-18-2011 Page 6 of 8 Approved by Council: DRAFT help citizens by having brochures available and more information on our website. Other discussion included incentives for businesses to use the monument sign as opposed to freestanding signs; and of the possibility of having the Community Development Director provide some discretion due to unique circumstances, with Ms. Barlow adding that some of the current codes reviewed do provide such discretion. Mr. Hohman mentioned that staff might need to re-examine the thirty-day situation as we don't have staff to monitor the start and end time limitations. 11. Revised Draft Legislative Agenda—Mike Jackson City Manager Jackson referenced the draft legislative agenda and mentioned that those items which have been completed,have now been removed;and said if council concurs,we can bring this back for a motion consideration at next week's meeting. Mayor Towey questioned if the topic of tourism is something our lobbyist could research,or if the issue is settled,and suggested we obtain Ms. Taylor's input on that issue. Mr. Jackson said he will ask her to send an e-mail or write us a letter concerning tourism,that her reaction is we are trying to protect our state shared revenues, that tourism was cut in 2011 so this is not a new cut for 2012, but the legislators have to find reductions to balance their budget, and that there will always be someone or some group opposed to every proposed budget reduction. 12. Streamlined Sales Tax—Mike Jackson/Mark Calhoun Finance Director Calhoun gave the background on the state government's streamlined sales tax issue and the impact of the mitigation payments on our city budget; and said ours was one of those cities impacted negatively; he said he is not aware of the state ever discussing a sunset on the streamlined sales mitigation, and if they had, cities would likely have resisted that idea. Mr. Jackson said in regard to how the program is working for the state, we simply don't know if the state is in a better position than previously; and Councilmember Grassel suggested that if this isn't working, perhaps a solution would be to return to the way it was handled previously. Discussion included mention of some retailers mis-coding their sales tax to the wrong city, and Mr. Calhoun said his department is working up a means of tracking the 100 to 200 largest businesses to make sure they are coding correctly. 13.Helmet Safety—Cary Driskell City Attorney Driskell said that council heard a presentation last month from the Spokane Regional Health District regarding helmets for bicycles and other wheeled vehicles; and in that regard,Mr. Driskell said he included a copy of the helmet ordinance from Spokane City and Spokane County, and he explained the main provisions of those ordinances. In response to enforcement questions, Chief VanLeuven said he felt the City of Spokane has only given out a handful or so of$15 or $25 citations over the last five years, and that their goal is education and not to fine people, and he mentioned the positive educational opportunities provided by such groups as SCOPE as they put on bike rodeos, and distribute ice cream coupons to children who were "caught"wearing a helmet. At 10:00 p.m., it was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels and seconded, to extend the meeting another thirty minutes. Vote by acclamation: In Favor: Mayor Towey, Deputy Mayor Schimmels, and Councilmembers Grassel, Grafos, and Gothmann. Opposed: Councilmembers Hafner and Woodard. Motion carried. Mayor Towey said he feels we are way ahead on the education element of bike helmets and that he prefers the reward approach over the negative, citation approach; and Councilmember Hafner added that we should not take over parental responsibility, and agreed with the positive educational approach. Councilmember Grafos suggested having additional educational signs near schools such as "Helmets are Cool." 14.Advance Agenda—Mayor Towey Councilmember Gothmann asked about the manufactured home zones issue and said he would like to ask staff to review the two ordinances given to council to determine the effect of the zones on residents and Council Study Session Minutes 10-18-2011 Page 7 of 8 Approved by Council: DRAFT on landowners as well; and to compare what we have with these other city ordinances; and Council concurred. 15. Information Only The Interstate Signing, Site Selector Update, and Wastewater Fees were for information only and were not discussed or reported. 16. Council Check-in—Mayor Towey Deputy Mayor Schimmels reported that as Chair of the SRTC (Spokane Regional Transportation Council), he is in receipt of a letter addressed to the Mayor, stating that the SRTC has an emergency request for additional funds in the amount of 15%, which would equate to $2,895 additional payment for calendar year 2011; and that the SRTC Board met last week and all board members voted for this emergency increase. Councilmember Grafos asked to have Public Works Director Kersten report back on the flooding problem on Thorpe Road and Mr. Jackson indicated staff is working on that issue. Mayor Towey also noted the draft letter in tonight's council packet under tab 16, which discusses the County's ballot issue of a regional animal shelter, and outlines that our city supports the regional concept,but does not support subsidizing another entity;and councilmembers concur with sending the letter. 17. City Manager Comments—Mike Jackson Regarding the street maintenance contract and examining all our contracts, City Manager Jackson stated that staff will work on that issue and come back with a spreadsheet showing the cost fluctuations, terms, expirations, and other aspects; adding that the Poe Contract expires 12-31-2014. Mr. Jackson said that there has been some new Idaho State legislation introduced and staff will research that as well. There being no further business, it was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels, seconded and unanimously agreed to adjourn. The meeting adjourned at 10:25 p.m. Thomas E. Towey,Mayor ATTEST: Christine Bainbridge,City Clerk Council Study Session Minutes 10-18-2011 Page 8 of 8 Approved by Council: DRAFT MINUTES City of Spokane Valley City Council Regular Meetings Formal Meeting Format Tuesday, October 25,2011 Mayor Towey called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. Attendance: City Staff Tom Towey,Mayor Mike Jackson,City Manager Gary Schimmels,Deputy Mayor Cary Driskell,City Attorney Bill Gothmann,Councilmember Mark Calhoun,Finance Director Dean Grafos,Councilmember Neil Kersten,Public Works Director Brenda Grassel,Councilmember John Hohman,Community Dev. Director Chuck Hafner,Councilmember Mike Stone,Parks&Recreation Director Arne Woodard,Councilmember Mike Basinger, Senior Planner Kelly Konkright,Deputy City Attorney Carolbelle Branch,Public Information Officer Chris Bainbridge,City Clerk INVOCATION: Pastor Steve Diamanti of New Life Assembly of God Church gave the invocation. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Members of Boy Scout Troop 481 led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL: City Clerk Bainbridge called the roll;all councilmembers were present. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: It was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels, seconded and unanimously agreed to approve the agenda. INTRODUCTION OF SPECIAL GUESTS AND PRESENTATIONS: COMMITTEE,BOARD,LIAISON SUMMARY REPORTS: Councilmember Woodard: reported that he attended the Inland NW Ladies Second Annual Tea;went to a Freddie Mac/Fannie Mae forum; the UGA (Urban Growth Act) open house; and a business connections breakfast where an Eastern Washington University economics expert spoke. Councilmember Gothmann: said he attended a Spokane Valley Business Association meeting where a representative from Avista made a presentation concerning "green" activities; said he attended the last meeting for the year for HCDAC (Housing Community Development Advisory Committee), where they discussed contingency plans for their grants; went to a Board of Health Executive Committee where it was reported they will have to delete a department of about six people in order to balance their budget, and that their official meeting is this Thursday; went to a Chamber of Commerce Breakfast where he heard that retail in Spokane Valley declined faster than any place in the county,and also that we have 5% unemployment in the Valley compared with about 9% in the County; went to the Spokane Valley Auditor's Exit Conference; a 9-1-1 Board Meeting this morning where it was mentioned that about twenty towers are going up around the county for first responders' communications,and that the plan is to phase in about five towers at a time. Councilmember Grafos: said he also attended the Inland NW Ladies Second Annual Tea, and the Chamber of Commerce Business Connections Breakfast. Deputy Mayor Schimmels: reported that he attended an STA (Spokane Transit Authority) meeting last week. Council Regular Meeting 10-25-2011 Page 1 of 10 Approved by Council: DRAFT Councilmember Grassel: said she attended the Annual Tea; went to a ribbon cutting for Spokane Community Colleges;and Chaired the Lodging Tax Committee Meeting. Councilmember Hafner: said he attended the STA meeting; the City's audit exit meeting; visited Felts Field and suggested Council tour the facility;and went to the UGA meeting last night. MAYOR'S REPORT: Mayor Towey reported that he went to the Spokane Community Colleges ribbon cutting; a City Forum downtown with Kathy McMorris Rogers who spoke about jobs in the Pacific Northwest and what her committee is doing to enhance that; went to Opportunity Elementary School for their 5th Graders' Career Day; met with County Commissioner Mark Richard; went to our City's Exit Audit meeting;went to the UGA meeting; and met today with Senator Patty Murray's Representative. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Mayor Towey invited general public comments. 1. Dr. Robert J. McCann, Executive Director of Catholic Charities of Spokane: said he recognizes we are living in challenging economic times, and that difficult times result in city leaders making difficult decisions; and that what we do in our community to protect and preserve each other often defines who we are;he said there are many in our community who are weak and frail due to a variety of reasons and said it is "our job to protect these vulnerable, at-risk members of our community." Dr. McCann said each councilmember has a sacred responsibility to protect those in need; and said that this past year this Council has made decisions that have not lived up to that responsibility; and said it is heartbreaking to those fragile persons who have been pushed aside and forgotten in the process of some of the work done by this Council. He spoke concerning Council's decision not to allow a zoning change to allow Catholic Charities to build housing for low income, fragile seniors on the campus of St. John Vianney's Parish; and said that was more than a missed opportunity to protect those in need, but was perhaps and unfortunately "symptomatic of a deeper and more chronic disregard of the common good." Dr. McCann said Council made the wrong decision, which decision was in opposition to the opinion of the City Attorney and City staff; and he said every councilmember except Deputy Mayor Schimmels denied the request. He further said the Council's choice was one of self-interest and of political self-preservation;he said the choice allowed about forty individuals on Walnut Street to promote their own self-interest and their own backroom deal with some members of Council; and said these were the same residents who did not complain when a liquor store and a casino opened on their street in recent years. He said council made the choice because council perceives that those who would be harmed by such a decision would be powerless to make a challenge. Dr. McCann said he is here tonight on behalf of those seniors; and said if Council is unable to make decisions for the common good which promote human dignity, and if Council won't protect those in need, then Dr. McCann asked Council to "prayerfully discern whether or not you are suited to hold these offices." Dr. McCann said if Council can't do what is right for the community,he formally asked Council to remove their names from the ballot for city council and to immediately relinquish the position of councilmember so others who are willing to defend and promote the common good can take these important positions; he said it is difficult for him to ask that but feels Council failed in their leadership, and if such continues,he asked Council to "discern the appropriateness of your future in public office." 2. Mel Jones, 1404 N Hodges Road: he commended Council for their forward acts taken regarding the "chicken ordinance" passed earlier this year; said he realizes November 1 is the deadline for things to consider for next year, and he asked Council to consider adding food sovereignty for such things as food safety, nutrition, agricultural and food entrepreneur activities; said he's involved with a company called "Food Access Coalition" and that they are in the process of drafting a comprehensive plan which they would bring to council later to consider adopting; and said if the teapartyers have their way, a lot of the infrastructure that supports safe food will disappear; and if you have the opportunity,he asked Council to lay down some good solid policies and ordinances that will allow people to have control over what they eat. Council Regular Meeting 10-25-2011 Page 2 of 10 Approved by Council: DRAFT 3. Edna Parkinson, 6300 E 2nd Avenue, Space 121: spoke concerning the issue of manufactured homes and of the ability of the owner to sell the land; said she invested about$20,000 in her home and has lived there for over eighteen years, that it is an older home and if she had to move it, it would probably fall apart; and said she couldn't afford to move it anyway; that the landlord is not required to pay moving costs; that this is not just about the money but about friendships formed in the park where people look after each other;and said she hopes council considers re-zoning the parks. 4. Naomi Eisentrager, 2601 N Barker Road: also spoke concerning the manufactured home issue; said people live on rented lots for various reasons; that she is hopeful council will consider a permanent mobile home zoning ordinance; and she handed copies of her written statement to the City Clerk for distribution to Council,and read her statement in support of the zoning change. 5. Randy Chapman, Vice President of the Association: said he has heard neighbors speak, that he met with many councilmembers and appreciates their time and said he hopes council will consider this move tonight to put this on the agenda for next year's discussion and implementation. 1. PUBLIC HEARING: Amended 2011 Budget—Mark Calhoun Mayor Towey opened the public hearing 6:37 p.m. Finance Director Calhoun explained that the proposed 2011 budget amendment reflects changes that have occurred through the normal course of operations, and includes such things as paying for half of the new shop facility, snowplow acquisition, and handling expenses related to some capital projects, as outlined in his spreadsheet. Mayor Towey invited public comment;no comments were offered and Mayor Towey closed the public hearing at 6:42 p.m. 2. PUBLIC HEARING and Motion Consideration: Community Development Block Grant — Scott Kuhta Mayor Towey opened the public hearing at 6:43 p.m. Planning Manager Kuhta explained about the two projects as noted in his October 25, 2011 Request for Council Action, and as discussed previously with council, mentioned the two projects as the Sprague Avenue Resurfacing, and the ADA Sidewalk Improvements. Mr. Kuhta noted that at the October 28 council meeting, Council questioned where the proposed Sprague Avenue project ranked relative to other City streets in terms of pavement conditions; and he reported that one-half of the proposed project area is scheduled for resurfacing in 2012, while the other half is scheduled for 2014, with the thought being if we are going to do half, we might as well do the entire street. Mr. Jackson stated that we are trying something a little different tonight by having the public hearing followed immediately with a motion consideration. Mayor Towey invited public comment; no comments were offered and Mayor Towey closed the public hearing at 6:44 p.m. It was then moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels and seconded, to direct staff to proceed with applications for selected projects with Sprague Avenue resurfacing as the highest priority. Mayor Towey invited public comments; no comments were offered. Vote by acclamation: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed: none. Motion carried. 3. CONSENT AGENDA: Consists of items considered routine which are approved as a group. Any member of Council may ask that an item be removed from the Consent Agenda to be considered separately. a.Approval of the following claim vouchers: VOUCHER LIST DATE VOUCHER NUMBERS: TOTAL AMOUNT 10-05-2011 3699-3702; 3712;24059-24063 $235,513.48 10-10-2011 24064-24098; 93110037; 1005110006 $2,033,735.55 10-10-2011 24099 $1,513.45 10-14-2011 24100-24139 $130,495.30 10-18-2011 24140-24192 $313,441.14 Council Regular Meeting 10-25-2011 Page 3 of 10 Approved by Council: DRAFT 10-18-2011 24193-24198 $750.00 GRAND TOTAL $2,715,448.92 b.Approval of Payroll for period ending October 15,2011: $241,734.39 c.Approval of Minutes of October 4,2011 Study Session Format Council Meeting Councilmember Hafner asked that voucher #24080 be removed to be discussed separately. It was then moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels, seconded and unanimously agreed to approve the Consent Agenda with the elimination of voucher #24080. Councilmember Hafner asked the purpose of voucher #24080 expenditure, and Public Works Director Kersten explained that the purchase was for 10,500 gallon storage tanks to store the de-icer; that these amounts would allow a full tanker car of de-icer and give enough storage capacity to get through the winter, with a savings of about 200 a gallon, and said the storage tanks are above ground. It was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels, seconded and unanimously agreed to approve voucher#24080 for payment. NEW BUSINESS: 4. Second Reading Proposed Ordinance 11-014 Amending Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan by Adopting a Bike and Pedestrian Element—Mike Basinger After City Clerk Bainbridge read the ordinance title, it was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels and seconded, to approve ordinance 11-014 amending the Comprehensive Plan by adopting the Spokane Valley Bike and Pedestrian Master Program (BPMP). Senior Planner Basinger gave a quick overview of this process, and said this chapter will provide background information and guiding policies and goals for council and the community.Mayor Towey invited public comment. Cathy Harris, 13908 E. 32nd Avenue said she feels this is a win/win for Spokane Valley, that it educates the public about which roads might be safer for bike travelers, it represents a cost savings or no cost; she mentioned the benefits of exercise; said this benefits our entire community, said people have the right to travel safely; and she urged council's approval. Chris Wetherill, 7712 E. Utah Avenue: said he favors the adoption of the plan; and he thanked everyone involved with special thanks directed to Senior Planner Mike Basinger. Art Zack, 11715 E. Glenview Circle: said he feels this is a good deal for the city; that he loves biking but walks more than he bikes; and drives more than he walks or bikes; that he cares about all three types of transportation; said this is a question of balance and he feels the plan is balanced and will save our city money since it is an integrated plan; that if you have a high quality of life in the city it will attract high-paying jobs with creative people, he urged Council approval; and also gave thanks to Mike Basinger and the rest of the planners and staff who held over two years of public meetings, and workshops, and he commended them for an outstanding job of informing people. Helen Dewey, 1101 W. College: handed the clerk a letter from Dr. McCullough of the Spokane Health District and read part of the letter commending the vision of the plan and supporting its adoption into the City's comprehensive plan. There were no further comments. Vote by Acclamation: In favor: Unanimous. Opposed:None. Motion carried. 5. Second Reading proposed ordinance 11-015,Levying 2012 Property Tax—Mark Calhoun After City Clerk Bainbridge reads the ordinance title, it was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels and seconded to approve Ordinance 11-015 levying regular property taxes for 2012. Finance Director Calhoun went over his PowerPoint presentation explaining this and ordinance 11-016, which ordinances he explained, are required by state law. Mayor Towey invited public comment; no comments were offered. Vote by Acclamation:In favor: Unanimous. Opposed:None. Motion carried. Council Regular Meeting 10-25-2011 Page 4 of 10 Approved by Council: DRAFT 6. Second Reading Proposed Ordinance 11-016, Confirming 2012 Property Tax—Mark Calhoun After City Clerk Bainbridge read the ordinance title, it was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels and seconded, to approve Ordinance 11-016 confirming the 2012 property tax levy. Mayor Towey invited public comment; no comments were offered. Mr. Calhoun again remarked that this represents no change of the ad valorem property tax levy from the previous year. Vote by Acclamation: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed:None. Motion carried. 7.First Reading Proposed Ordinance 11-017 Adopting 2012 Budget—Mark Calhoun After City Clerk Bainbridge read the ordinance title, it was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels and seconded, to advance Ordinance No. 11-017, adopting the 2012 Budget, to a second reading. Mr. Calhoun went over his PowerPoint presentation. Mayor Towey invited public comment; no comments were offered. Vote by Acclamation:In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed:None. Motion carried. 8.First Reading Proposed Ordinance 11-018 Franchise Agreement Bonneville Power—Cary Driskell After City Clerk Bainbridge read the ordinance title, it was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels and seconded to advance Ordinance 11-018 authorizing execution of an electrical transmission franchise with BPA, to a second reading. City Attorney Driskell gave a history of this franchise, explaining that it was a fifty-year agreement signed January 9, 1959 between BPA and Spokane County; that even though the agreement expired in 2009, the terms are intact until a new agreement is entered into; and mentioned that local jurisdictions are precluded by federal law from requiring any liability provisions from the federal government in franchise agreements; and said that aside from some changes to reflect current law, this is just a replacement agreement. Mayor Towey invited public comment; no comments were offered. Vote by Acclamation:In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed:None. Motion carried. At 7:35 p.m.,Mayor Towey called for a recess;and reconvened the meeting at 7:48 p.m. 9. Proposed Resolution 11-008 Amending Fee Resolution for 2012—Mark Calhoun It was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels and seconded, to approve Resolution No. 11-008 amending the Master Fee Schedule for 2012. Finance Director Calhoun explained that the proposed changes are not expected to have a significant impact on the 2012 revenues; that as part of the annual operating budget, departments were asked to review their fees and ascertain if any changes needed to be made, either in fees or language; and he noted that these changes would not be effective until January 1, 2012. Councilmember Grassel asked about the fire department fees under Schedule C and whether we have any control in that since it appears the fees increased 14%from the previous year. Mr. Calhoun explained that we have an interlocal agreement between us and the Fire District, that it would be possible to amend that in the future and simply have those fees as a pass-through since we merely collect them on behalf of the Fire District. City Attorney Driskell confirmed that staff is recommending considering amending that interlocal to remove that clause. Mr. Calhoun brought Council's attention to the last page in the documents which is an explanation from the Fire District for the change in fees. Mayor Towey invited public comment; no comments were offered. Vote by Acclamation: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed: None. Motion carried. 10.Motion Consideration: Draft Legislative Agenda—Mike Jackson It was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels and seconded to approve the proposed revised 2011-2013 Legislative Agenda. City Manager Jackson explained that this is the same agenda brought forward to council previously, and he gave the highlights of an e-mail received this date from Briahna Taylor discussing several follow-up items from Council's previous discussion, including tourism funding and streamlined sales tax mitigation funding. Mr. Jackson reported that Ms. Taylor feels that since the tourism funding was cut last year, with the state making additional cuts now to its budget, that they will be seeking to protect the revenues that were not cut, therefore it seems highly unlikely the state would choose to re-fund a program already cut; and concerning the streamlined sales tax mitigation funding,Ms. Council Regular Meeting 10-25-2011 Page 5 of 10 Approved by Council: DRAFT Taylor reported that it was profitable for the state and that she is working to get specific numbers from the Department of Revenue. Mr. Jackson noted we likely won't know for a few weeks what the AWC (Association of Washington Cities) will have as their final legislation agenda. Mayor Towey invited public comment; no comments were offered. Vote by Acclamation: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed: None. Motion carried. 11.Motion Consideration: Letter for SRTC Emergency Funds—Mike Jackson It was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels and seconded to approve payment for the emergency one-time additional 15% increase of$2,895 to SRTC. City Manager Jackson explained that SRTC (Spokane Regional Transportation Council) Executive Director Kevin Wallace sent a letter to Mayor Towey and Deputy Mayor Schimmels explaining that the SRTC Board unanimously passed a motion to request at 15% increase in calendar year 2011 from local contributions; that this emergency is necessary due to a number of unanticipated expenses that occurred through the past year, that the 15% represents $2,895 in local contributions; and because of the time sensitivity, they are requesting a response no later than November 10, 2011. Mr. Jackson noted that Section 8 of the Interlocal, explains that members who have "annual assessments increased by more than fifteen percent shall be given written notice one year in advance of a proposed budget assessment, " and that this is not greater than the mentioned fifteen percent. Mayor Towey invited public comment; no comments were offered. Deputy Mayor Schimmels added that this was due to several odd circumstances; and that they have no intention to do this again next year,that this is just to cover this year's shortfall. Vote by Acclamation:In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed: None. Motion carried. 12. Motion Consideration: Letter Authorizing Extension of Solid Waste Interlocal Agreement — Cary Driskell It was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels and seconded to authorize staff to execute the proposed amendment to the "Interlocal Agreement (CH 39.34, RCW) Between the City of Spokane, Spokane County and the City of Spokane Valley Re: Spokane Regional Solid Waste Management System" thereby extending the agreement until November 16, 2014. City Attorney Driskell explained that this issue has been going on for some time now; and he gave some of the background of the agreement as per the information contained on the October 25, 2011 Request for Council Action form; he said the City of Spokane and Spokane County are at the end of the negotiations for the operating agreement with Wheelabrator, and when Spokane pays off the outstanding debt on the Waste-to-Energy facility on December 1, 2011, our agreement will expire. He also noted that we anticipate Spokane and Spokane County to enter into an agreement for the operation of the Waste to Energy Facility until November 15, 2014,which is also the date identified on the attached three-year extension as the new expiration date;and said that our staff will continue to negotiate with Spokane City and Spokane County for long term solid waste disposal. Tipping fee increases were mentioned and Deputy Mayor Schimmels said the Liaison Board is recommending a $6.00 increase for 2012, $3.00 in 2013 and 2014, but that they are only an advisory board. Mayor Towey invited public comment; no comments were offered. Councilmember Woodard said he feels we are squandering our negotiating opportunity by not acting sooner,and estimates we lost several million dollars of potential negotiating power. Vote by Acclamation: In Favor: Mayor Towey, Deputy Mayor Schimmels, and Councilmembers Hafner, Grassel, Gothmann and Grafos. Opposed: Councilmember Woodard. Motion carried. PUBLIC COMMENT: Mayor Towey invited general public comment. Joe McGrath, 9320 E. Montgomery, spoke concerning the benefits of Felts Field and of the positive asset there for training helicopter pilots. Amelia O'Deen, 12415 East 12th Avrnue: said she was giving one last plea to council to study the manufactured housing and zoning issue as it is important to 1,100 citizens directly and indirectly to thousands more. Council Regular Meeting 10-25-2011 Page 6 of 10 Approved by Council: DRAFT ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS: 13. Lodging Tax Funding—Mark Calhoun Finance Director Calhoun said he estimates $231,000 available in lodging tax funds for next year, and explained that the funds can only be spent on tourism; he said Council gets a non-binding advisory from the Lodging Tax Advisory Committee for funding allocations recommendations, and stressed these are only recommendations as the ultimate decision for funding rests with Council. Mr. Calhoun said that some of the applicants made presentations October 13, and that the committee has recommended the following allocations: $42,600 for the HUB; $185,000 to the Sports Commission, $3,900 to the Museum, nothing to SpoCon which was scheduled to make a presentation but did not show up, and nothing to Valleyfest. Mr. Calhoun said the Committee also recommends that CenterPlace apply for funding just like other applicants instead of automatically receiving an allocation; and that the Committee recommended a second funding cycle after the first of the year. Mr. Calhoun said the City's 2012 budget includes $30,000 of hotel/motel tax proceeds to use for CenterPlace advertising. Mr. Calhoun mentioned there will be approximately $220,000 as an ending fund balance and the committee recommends drawing down those funds to no less than $100,000. Councilmember Gothmann asked what effect would there be on staff to have a second round, and Mr. Calhoun said his staff could handle it, but he stressed he has limited staff and that he wouldn't want to do more than two a year. Councilmember Gothmann voiced his disappointment in no funds being allocated to Valleyfest and said he feels that is just wrong; that Valleyfest is the festival to celebrate our city; yet the committee recommended funds to the Museum which does not likely generate heads in beds, and funds to the HUB as well, which is actually outside our city limits; that he feels Valleyfest is similar to the Site Selector, where we set funds aside for that specific purpose, and said it seems logical to have funds set aside for Valleyfest; he said he realizes this issue is not scheduled for action tonight; but he wanted to voice his suggestions and state that he is not pleased with what the committee did and feels it was a dis-service to the community and to the Council. Councilmember Gothmann stated he has no objection to a second round. Councilmember Grassel asked that between now and when the actual vote takes place, she would like Council to have copies of the applications, and Mr. Calhoun agreed. Councilmember Grassel said this is the second year she has chaired the committee; that Valleyfest was discussed; that the Board would recommend authorizing $36,000 but going forward, they would like to see that reduced since it is a local, three-day event,and have the city pick up those funds instead of the using funds from the lodging tax; and said that Council is looking for a return for lodging tax dollars from these groups; that groups like the Sports Commission have a larger return on their investment as they do activities year-round; and she mentioned that Valleyfest applied for outside agency funding this year and was awarded$19,000;that the request for the lodging tax funds was for$50,000 to be used in advertising, and said the committee didn't feel it was a good use of dollars since the local community event doesn't necessarily draw people to come here and stay in hotels; and she suggested having that second round for everyone who wants to apply, even those who applied and were funded during the first round. Councilmember Grassel said the CenterPlace issue was discussed last year as well, that they should have to apply; that it is part of the information process to give council a review of what they did for those dollars, and going back to Valleyfest, they want to see what return Valleyfest got for previous funds. Councilmember Gothmann said the state statutes state the funds are to be used for tourism, and includes such things as museums, and festivals, and that therefore, these funds are designed for such things as Valleyfest; he said he personally saw people at Valleyfest that he knows were from out of town; that Valleyfest brings in tourists;that many times there are figures that are not easy to compute,and he said he feels the committee needs to re-read the state statutes, and reiterated that the funds are for all tourism,not just stays in hotels/motels. Councilmember Grassel said there is a big difference between a $50,000 three-day event and the HUB filling their building year-round as they put on camps and activities in partnership with the Sports Commission; that the difference is huge; she said she is not discouraging Valleyfest from applying, but that the three-day event is mainly driven for the local community. Deputy Council Regular Meeting 10-25-2011 Page 7 of 10 Approved by Council: DRAFT Mayor Schimmels added that Council has some things to consider, such as where do we stand with CenterPlace and Valleyfest; the second round of applications, and to consider the entity that applied but failed to attend the presentation on the 13th. Mayor Towey said the ultimate decision is Council's and that Council is responsible to accept the advice from the committee and to weigh that to the benefit of our citizens; and said he agrees with Councilmember Gothmann that a second application process should take place; and prior to the fmal decision, would like to know much funds are left over in reserves so council knows how much would be available for a second round of funding; he said the funds are not meant to be carried over but are meant to be spent; and to answer the question of why three committee members initially agreed that Valleyfest should receive funding, but in the committee's final vote no funds were allocated,that perhaps the applications will help answer those questions;and said historically CenterPlace was given $90,000 so allocating $30,000 to CenterPlace seems reasonable to him;that he wants to review all the applications and CenterPlace should be included. 14.Manufactured Homes Zoning—Kelly Konkright Deputy City Attorney Konkright explained that last week Council requested more information in order to address some of the public's concerns about the interest of manufactured homeowners and park owners, whereby the home is on leased park land, and of the concern about the temporary nature and whether the homeowner could be forced to move their home, and the costs associated with that issue. Mr. Konkright said that the unique situation where a home owner has invested money in a valuable asset but chose to put it on a temporary lease holder's land, creates tension between the homeowner and the land owner; and several manufactured home owners have voiced their concerns about a lack of protection in our zoning ordinances to guard against an owner from selling the property or converting the park to another use. Mr. Konkright said that the City of Tumwater as well as the City of Lynnwood have mobile home or manufactured home park zoning ordinances, and that there is current litigation against the City of Tumwater which is on appeal as the landowner brings forth a number of Constitutional challenges. Mr. Konkright said that the two ordinances are similar; that Lynnwood allows slightly more uses and they don't prevent the property from being converted; that they restrict the uses of the property to a degree to where under many circumstances, the most profitable use would be the manufactured home park; and since it would be less profitable to convert the use to something else,the hope is the land owner wouldn't do that. Mr. Konkright went over the content of the two ordinances and mentioned some things for Council's consideration: the Department of Commerce tracks closures of manufactured home parks since they (the parks) are required to disclose when they are going to close, and since 2007,the Department of Commerce has no reports of any park closures in Spokane Valley. Mr. Konkright added that there are no planned closures in Spokane Valley, and the situation is similar in Spokane City. Spokane County had only one closure during that time, and that was,Mr. Konkright explained, in Cheney. Mr. Konkright said there are state law protections such as the landlord/tenant act for home parks which states that the owner must disclose the current zoning so the homeowner knows what uses are allowed; that they must offer at least a one-year tenancy and a promise it won't close for at least three years,which notice can be waived by the tenant when the rental agreement is signed; and said that whoever buys the park would be bound by the landlord's obligations as those provisions would run with the land. At approximately 9:00 p.m., it was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels, seconded and unanimously agreed to extend the meeting for thirty minutes. Deputy City Attorney Konkright also explained that state law includes a system for those forced to relocate whereby they can get reimbursed for moving expenses through a state fund managed by the Department of Commerce; that the amount for mobile homes is up to $12,000, and for a single-wide the maximum reimbursement is $7,000; and Mr. Konkright stressed that this is a reimbursement program so the homeowner would have to incur the expense, but could get reimbursed 100% of their cost up to the stated maximums. Mr. Konkright also mentioned there are property rights of park owners and equal protection challenges as per the Fourteenth Amendment. Mr. Konkright added that regarding the Tumwater challenge; that the City prevailed initially but the matter is on appeal to the 9th Circuit Court Council Regular Meeting 10-25-2011 Page 8 of 10 Approved by Council: DRAFT which is historically known for taking a long time in coming to a decision, and said such decision could be a year or longer in the making; and in answer to Mayor Towey's question if we did an ordinance like Tumwater and the courts overturned that, we would be taking chances having such a regulation. Councilmember Gothmann asked where are the mobile home parks permitted in our city and Mr. Driskell mentioned that staff can research that information. Council discussion included mention that tenants want security and the two city ordinances don't guarantee that the manufactured home owner would not be asked to move from the leased property; a question about grandfathering came up and Mr. Driskell said that it would be a pointless ordinance if it didn't apply to existing home parks. Councilmember Grafos said he feels the Tumwater ordinance is a taking, that there is a unique situation with mobile homes as unlike renting an apartment,the tenant doesn't bring in a$40,000 investment; that a lot of these old parks are a target for developers;and mentioned the idea of giving the home owners a three-year window so any developer would have to look at the long range issue. Councilmember Woodard suggested gathering more information on where manufactured homes can be placed in Spokane Valley and said perhaps we could take some ideas to the legislators and seek their help. City Attorney Driskell stated that it appears we are not in a situation of any imminent action and said there are several legal issues to examine closely, one of which would be interfering with a contractual relationship, as well as Constitutional issues, and said staff will monitor the Tumwater case; that this issue came upon us quickly, and staff would like to develop the issue more and that he feels there is ample time to do that. At approximately 9:30 p.m., it was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels and seconded to extend the meeting another thirty minutes. In Favor:Mayor Towey, Deputy Mayor Schimmels, and Councilmembers Grassel, Grafos, Gothmann and Woodard. Opposed: Councilmember Hafner. Motion carried. 15. Comp Plan Discussion- John Hohman Community Development Director Hohman gave some background on the process for amending our comprehensive plan and discussed the draft amendment docket; and said he wanted to take this opportunity to ask Council for input on other city-initiated changes Council might want to see on the docket; that manufactured homes might be an idea, or council can weigh that as we move forward. Mr. Hohman explained that we are allowed by law to amend the comprehensive plan annually, and our deadline to do so is November 1st; that due to the current workload and focus on permitting, staff has not initiated a lot of different amendments, either text or maps; that of those five privately initiated amendments,we have received two actual applications but expect a few more as the deadline approaches. Councilmember Woodard mentioned his desire to include manufactured housing and senior housing, and City Attorney Driskell voiced his concern with adding that topic prior to knowing the outcome in the Ninth Circuit, and said it may be more appropriate to have that on for next year. Mayor Towey agreed and said he doesn't feel we have enough information to move forward on the manufactured housing in one week; and Director Hohman concurred the better approach might be to work through that issue systematically; that regarding senior housing, he said it is on our pending list but we haven't had time to delve into that yet. Mr. Hohman then explained about the city-initiated comp plan text and map amendments and summarized those proposed amendments. Councilmember Grafos mentioned he would like to include the "garden office" designation at places such as Argonne, and would like to review that on a comprehensive basis; and Councilmember Grassel mentioned the Milwaukee right-of-way and Mr. Hohman responded that would be a separate track about facilities,but not part of a comprehensive plan. 16.Advance Agenda—Mayor Towey Councilmember Hafner asked for an analysis of the fee schedule and how we compare to other municipalities; and Mr. Jackson said staff intends to come back throughout next year with an exhaustive review. City Manager Jackson said he wanted to clarify a point concerning the recent exit conference our city had with the State Auditors, and during that conference the auditors mentioned we never had a finding, but Mr. Jackson said to clarify,we had a finding in 2006 and 2007 on the same issue concerning how soon and how the city transferred capital projects from construction phase into an asset for the city; Council Regular Meeting 10-25-2011 Page 9 of 10 Approved by Council: DRAFT that since then, there have been no findings; and he mentioned that all auditor's reports can be found on the State Auditor's website. INFORMATION ONLY: Department Reports, Railroad Memorandum, Stormwater Update, Urban Growth Area Update, and Thorpe Road were all for information only and were not discussed or reported. There being no further business, it was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels, seconded and unanimously agreed to adjourn. The meeting adjourned at 9:48 p.m. Thomas E. Towey,Mayor ATTEST: Christine Bainbridge,City Clerk Council Regular Meeting 10-25-2011 Page 10 of 10 Approved by Council: DRAFT MINUTES SPOKANE VALLEY CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING STUDY SESSION FORMAT Spokane Valley City Hall Council Chambers Spokane Valley,Washington November 1,2011 6:00 p.m. Attendance: Councilmembers Staff Tom Towey,Mayor Mike Jackson,City Manager Gary Schimmels,Deputy Mayor Roger Crum,Interim Deputy City Manager Bill Gothmann,Councilmember Cary Driskell,City Attorney Dean Grafos,Councilmember John Hohman Community Dev. Director Brenda Grassel,Councilmember Kelly Konkright,Deputy City Attorney Chuck Hafner,Councilmember Neil Kersten,Public Works Director Arne Woodard,Councilmember Mark Calhoun,Finance Director Scott Kuhta,Planning Manager Steve Worley, Senior Engineer Carolbelle Branch,Public Information Officer Chris Bainbridge,City Clerk Mayor Towey called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. ACTION ITEMS: 1. Sullivan Road W.Bridge Replacement, Survey Contract—Steve Worley It was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels and seconded to authorize the City Manager or his designee to execute a contract with CH2M Hill for surveying and topographic mapping services in an amount not to exceed$75,000 for the Sullivan Road West Bridge Replacement Project #0155. Senior Engineer Worley explained that to meet the tight timeframes of the TIGER III grant, CH2M Hill has developed a scope of work to begin the surveying and topographic mapping as soon as possible; that the survey and mapping work is needed to begin the preliminary design phase and must be done before snow begins to fall. Mr. Worley explained that the contract before council tonight is just for the surveying portion of the project; that some of the estimated fees may change as a result of further negotiations but that the motion would remain since it would remain below $75,000; and said that CH2M Hill has done a good job of negotiating with their subcontractor. In response to council question, Mr. Worley said the TIGER grant was submitted yesterday, and staff does not know when those decisions will be made. Mayor Towey invited public comment; no comments were offered. Vote by Acclamation: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed: None. Motion carried. 2. Comprehensive Plan Amendment Docket—John Hohman It was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels and seconded to approve the 2012 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Docket as updated. Planning Manager Kuhta explained that notification was publicized that we would accept applications for the 2012 Comprehensive Plan Amendment cycle through November 1, 2011, and that this updated list which includes seven privately initiated amendments represents the current docket; he said this represents a big work load and staff will be bringing forward a lot of information and that this is just the start of the process which continues to spring 2012; and Mr. Kuhta briefly went over the city-initiated proposed amendments as shown on the chart. Councilmember Grafos asked about the timeframe to add amendments, and Mr. Kuhta said that council can add something tonight if that is council's desire. In response to Council question about the difference between the Council Study Session Minutes 11-01-2011 Page 1 of 5 Approved by Council: DRAFT original docket with five privately initiated amendments, and tonight's docket which contains seven which does not necessarily include all the original five,Mr. Kuhta said after the applicant moves through the pre-application process, a formal application must be made and fee paid to proceed, and these seven are indicative of that process. Mayor Towey invited public comment; no comments were offered. Councilmember Grafos asked about allowing boats and RV sales in the corridor mixed-use zone, and Mr. Kuhta explained that that and other minor items to be changed are being bundled in a batch amendment process which staff is working on, which is independent of the comp plan process. Vote by Acclamation: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed:None. Motion carried. NON-ACTION ITEMS: 3. Convention Center Update—Kevin Twohig, Sandy Wade Via their PowerPoint presentation, Spokane Public Facilities District board member Sandy Wade, and Spokane Public Facilities District CEO Kevin Twohig, gave an update on the District's approach to staying competitive and creating jobs, which included an update on the Convention Center completion, shoreline enhancements,and Arena seating upgrades. They explained that the Convention Center is being updated to meet the demand for more meeting space, which would mean facilitating more, and simultaneous events. They discussed some of the shoreline enhancements such as improvements to the Centennial Trail thereby making more public access; adding 750 seats to the Arena which will be good for about the next ten years as they discussed this proposal with the NCAA Basketball league, as those games tend to sell out almost immediately. They explained that these enhancements would mean about 800 new jobs, with over $100 million annual impact; and said that the $65 million projects cost will be placed before the voters on the April 2012 ballot, and if passed, would mean an extension of an existing rebate not a new tax.Mayor Towey and Council thanked them for their update. 4. Stormwater Grants—Neil Kersten Public Works Director Kersten explained that the State Legislature has provided a $30 million appropriation for statewide stormwater construction projects, and jurisdictions covered by a NPDES (National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System) Municipal Stormwater Permit may apply for funding through a competitive grant process; he said projects must be completed by June 30, 2015, and that there are several projects he would like to submit. Mr. Kersten said this information was included as an informational item in a council packet a few weeks ago, and tonight he seeks council consensus to move ahead and submit grant applications for the projects as noted on his Request for Council Action form: (1) new decant [vactor waste] facility; (2) projects eliminating municipal outfalls to Chester Creek and Glenrose Drainage, and (3) Sprague, Park to Thierman Swale Project. Director Kersten explained the decant facility,he said there are no facilities that handle that kind of water,as you can't dump that back in the drains or dump it anywhere; that we now have to add wood pellets to soak up the water to make it a solid so it can be hauled to a landfill; he said this facility will allow us to dump it on a concrete slab and handle the water separately;let the material dry,load into the trucks and take it to the landfill;he said this process will enable us to probably double the number of catchbasins that could be cleaned in a day; that there are over 8,000 drywells and we can only do a few hundred annually;he said we hit the main ones on the arterials and in the problem areas. Mr. Kersten said that WSDOT (Washington State Department of Transportation)is very interested in partnering with us,adding that they have separate funds. Mr.Kersten said this grant requires a 25% match so WSDOT could help us match a big chunk of this and we could use stormwater funds and/or APA (Aquifer Protection Area) funds to handle the remainder. Mr. Kersten said WSDOT has about one-fourth the volume we need and said they want to submit the application with us;he also stated that part of the problem with the drywells is some have no catchbasins or swales and we are slowly retro-fitting those; he said if the drywells don't perform well, you end up with local flooding and stressed that we need to keep the catchbasins clean so they don't fill up and ruin the drywell. Director Kersten added that Spokane River is under a PCB (Polychlorinated biphenyls) discussion and compliance and that there are PCBs in almost all the drywells. Council Study Session Minutes 11-01-2011 Page 2 of 5 Approved by Council: DRAFT Councilmember Hafner asked how the list was prioritized and Mr. Kersten said staff prioritized the list based on need; then based on how well staff feels the projects will score. Mr. Kersten said the work will be mostly all contracted; that we have a contractor now for the vactoring system, and we have trucks to haul the material to the landfill. Mr. Kersten explained about the current system of having the contracted employee sit idle while the water drains out of the debris,which is a waste of contracted time,and that we could convert almost all those costs to actual vactoring and the man could keep working all day instead of sitting there, which would mean handling four or five loads at once instead of multiple single trips, and said about 45% of the cost is having the contracted individual sit while the water drains. Discussion ensued concerning the cost to run the operation and Mr. Jackson said the discussion seems to be expanding the scope of the issue, and that staff could bring back other information later with more detail about putting in a facility; that the deadline for this grant is November 18; and Mr. Kersten said there are no vactoring facilities in the Spokane area. Council asked for more detail on the decant facility including comparisons of existing services and costs; and Mr. Kersten said if we were awarded the grant,we could get those details, but that we cannot get designs done and a Performa before we even get the grant. Mr. Kersten also highlighted some of the projects on the spreadsheet and described the other two projects listed; and Council concurred that staff will bring back additional information November 1 5th concerning the cost,payback and other details on the decant facility; and voiced no objection to staff proceeding with the other two grant applications. 5. Economic Development Update—Mike Jackson,John Hohman City Manager Jackson and Community Development Director Hohman explained that staff has been working toward developing short and long-term goals;that there have been a number of discussions about an economic development plan, and though Council/staff discussion, staff understood the direction is to focus on short-term goals and on what we can do immediately to enhance economic development. Their PowerPoint included current economic development strategies, including note that Mr. Hohman attended the week-long Northwest Economic Development Course; Mr. Hohman's "roadmap" for enhanced permitting, directional signs for Sprague and Appleway, SEPA reform and working with small business owners to improve change of occupancy codes; as well as city staff conducting meetings with such regional partners as GSI,Valley Chamber of Commerce,Regional Site Selector,Arts Council and ITA,to name a few. Mr. Hohman also reported on newly permitted businesses and buildings, such as Wal-Mart, Panda Express, Spokane Teachers Credit Union and others,as well as new development activity including improvements to O'Doherty's Pub, Safeway, Penney's, H&R Block, and others; and they concluded by listing the next steps for both the short and the long term goals. City Manager Jackson reported that the business plan is an ongoing process; it is started before developing the budget, and after the budget is adopted, the plan gets revised to make sure the plan matches the budget; and said staff will start working on those plans again late January or early February,with the goal to bring a draft economic development plan to council at the June retreat. Mayor Towey called for a recess at 7:30 p.m. and reconvened the meeting at 7:45 p.m. 6. Railroad Quiet Zones—Roger Crum Via his PowerPoint presentation, Interim Deputy City Manager Crum briefed Council on the background of Railroad Quiet Zones;including explanation of the instructions to the engineer if there is no quiet zone, explaining what a quiet zone is and how railroads feel about them, what techniques are allowed, and of the various gate and median requirements based on crossing configuration, along with the associated cost estimates for each; he explained wayside horns and their installation, maintenance and cost including liability, and said that Union Pacific currently operates fewer than ten daily trains through the city,while BNSF (Burlington Northern-Santa Fe) operates about fifty trains; that there are eight at-grade traffic crossings on UP lines within our city, and two more in Millwood, and seven at-grade traffic crossings on BNSF in our city; and that there are several side tracks in industrial areas and a little used north-south route in the City,but said he didn't examine those as part of this analysis. Councilmember Gothmann said Council Study Session Minutes 11-01-2011 Page 3 of 5 Approved by Council: DRAFT we won't know the costs unless we invest in an engineer to do the study; and Councilmember Woodard remarked that the new super horns are over 200 decibels,which he said is one of the reasons why some of the neighbors are upset. Mr. Crum said they are not supposed to exceed the new standard. Deputy Mayor Schimmels added that the noise is only half the problem with the other half of the problem being trains blocking intersections. 7. Governance Manual Draft—Chris Bainbridge Mayor Towey explained some of the background of this process, and of the numerous meetings held by the City Clerk, City Manager, City Attorney and Governance Committee. City Clerk Bainbridge expounded on that background, explained the rationale for some of the reorganization of the manual, and said it is Council's discretion on what, if any changes are made,and that there are no time constraints and the current resolution which adopted the Governance Manual will remain as is until changed or repealed. After some discussion of the best way for council to review the manual, it was determined that this issue will be added to the November 29th council agenda, and council will start with Chapter 1 and continue through the manual as time permits;and schedule additional dates for further review as needed. 8.Advance Agenda—Mayor Towey Mayor Towey suggested council take another tour of the city and City Manager Jackson said the tentative date is Tuesday, December 13th There were no objections. Councilmember Grassel asked for copies of the lodging grant applications prior to council's allocation of funds. 9. Council Check-in—Mayor Towey(Wastewater Rates) Mayor Towey brought council's attention to the rate study in the packet, sand said the committee came up with three suggestions for those rates, and said he would like to have this Council's recommended rate option to give this Thursday at the Wastewater Policy Advisory Board meeting. Mayor Towey explained that the three options include (1) decrease the WWTP (Wastewater Treatment Plant) charge in 2012; (2) retain current WWTP charge level; or (3) include Saltese Flats Phase 2 which means issuing $33.5 million in revenue bonds in 2014,and that twenty-year revenue bonds at an interest rate of 4.95%equates to an additional $2.7 million per year in debt service. Mayor Towey also stated that although option 2 means no change in rates to county ratepayers, it would actually mean an increase to Spokane Valley residents of $1.10 more a month since we took out our distribution as per the contract. Discussion included mention that option 1 would mean spending down the reserves to $10 million, which is still twice as much as is needed; that option 3 is not really an option;that it appears the only viable options are 1 or 2; and if the choice is the first option,rates could be adjusted later if needed. Mayor Towey said he will ask the Board about the differences in the various cities' rates. Councilmembers Gothmann, Grafos and Grassel indicated option 1 as their preference; with Mayor Towy and Councilmember Hafner preferring option 2. Others did not commit to a preferred option. Mayor Towey said he will relay that information at Thursday's committee meeting. At approximately 9:00 p.m., it was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels, seconded and unanimously agreed to extend the meeting thirty minutes. 10. City Manager Comments—Mike Jackson City Manager Jackson mentioned the AWC (Association of Washington Cities) letter before Council to Governor Gregoire asking the Governor to meet with a delegation of city representatives to discuss how we move forward for the benefit of all the people. Mr. Jackson said the Governor's proposed budget cuts targeting cities, such as eliminating the distribution of state liquor taxes and profits, along with other cuts, would amount to an estimated $1.6 million impact for our city, and said it is critical we weigh-in on this process. Mr. Jackson said that Senior Administrative Analyst Koudelka went through the Governor's Budget Reduction Alternatives concerning the proposed public safety reductions because if those reductions to the County occur, the funds will need to be made up somewhere, and he said there are two pages of potential or direct impacts in public safety for us, and said that Mr. Koudelka and Finance Director Calhoun will be before council in a few weeks to discuss these figures. Mr. Jackson asked Council Study Session Minutes 11-01-2011 Page 4 of 5 Approved by Council: DRAFT Council to consider authorizing the Mayor to sign and send the letter to AWC so they can send it on to the Governor. City Manager Jackson said he recommends staying the course since we don't know if this will happen, and if it does, we will have to make adjustments, but that no one will know for a while since the special session won't convene until November 28. There was consensus from Council to authorize the Mayor to sign and send the letter. There being no further business, it was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels, seconded and unanimously agreed to adjourn. The meeting adjourned at 9:15 p.m. Thomas E. Towey,Mayor ATTEST: Christine Bainbridge,City Clerk Council Study Session Minutes 11-01-2011 Page 5 of 5 Approved by Council: CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: November 15, 2011 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business © new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Second Reading of Proposed Ordinance No. 11-017 Adopting the 2012 Budget. GOVERNING LEGISLATION: State budget law. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: To date the Council has heard presentations on the 2012 Budget on seven previous occasions including three public hearings. At our last meeting on October 25, 2011, the Council approved Ordinance No. 11-017 adopting the 2012 Budget in its first reading. BACKGROUND: This marks the eighth and final occasion where the Council will have discussed the 2012 Budget and the 2012 Budget development calendar of Council meetings on this topic is as follows: • June 14 Council Budget Retreat • August 9 Admin report: Estimated 2012 revenues and expenditures • August 23 Public hearing #1 on 2012 revenues and expenditures • September 6 City Manager's presentation of preliminary 2012 Budget • September 27 Public hearing #2 on 2012 Budget • October 11 Public hearing #3 on 2012 Budget • October 25 First reading of Ordinance No. 11-017 adopting the 2012 Budget • November 15 Second reading of Ordinance No. 11-017 adopting the 2012 Budget 2012 Budget Highlights Include: • Total appropriations for all City Funds of $57.0 million including $11.3 million in capital expenditures. • Budgets will be adopted across 21 separate Funds. • Budget will include a new Aquifer Protection Area Fund. • Full-time equivalent (FTE) count will remain unchanged at 87.25 employees. • 2012 operating expenditure increases have been held at or below 1% over 2011. • Street Fund budget includes: o $500,000 for street preservation, plus o $100,000 to be set aside for future replacement of snow plows • A General Fund budget with total appropriations of$35,196,500 including o $34,660,900 in recurring expenditures, and o $535,600 in nonrecurring expenditures • General Fund estimated revenues of$34,908,800 including: o $16,200,000 in sales taxes (identical to the 2011 Budget) o $10,808,900 in property taxes (which include property taxes on new construction but DOES NOT include the 1% increase authorized by Initiative #747). P:IClerklAgendaPackets for Weblagendapacket 11-15-1111tem 2 RCA 2nd reading of Ordinance 11-017.docx The City's 2012 Budget is adopted at a fund level as follows: Estimate d Estimate d Be ginning Ending Fund Fund Fund Estimated Total Fund No. 111. Title Balanc' Revenues Sources` Appropriations Balance 001 General 26,633,061 34,908,800 61,541,861 35,196,500 26,345,361 101 Street O&M 1,834,574 4,902,800 6,737,374 5,431,263 1,306,111 103 Paths&Trails 36,186 8,000 44,186 0 44,186 105 Hotel/Motel Tax 253,356 430,700 684,056 430,700 253,356 120 CenterPlace Operating Reserve 353,231 700 353,931 0 353,931 121 Service Level Stabilization 5,477,795 10,000 5,487,795 0 5,487,795 122 Winter Weather Reserve 506,168 700 506,868 0 506,868 123 City Facilities Repair&Replacement 2,027,259 399,000 2,426,259 0 2,426,259 204 Debt Service LTGO 03 0 617,623 617,623 I 617,623 0 301 Capital Projects 194,277 475,400 669,677 456,279 213,398 302 'Special Capital Projects 1,547,015 477,000 2,024,015 1,540,710 483,305 303 Street Capital Projects _ 73,456 9,655,804 9,729,260 9,566,804 162,456 304 Mirabeau Projects 44,302 0 44,302 0 44,302 309 Parks Capital Projects 123,329 100,000 223,329 170,000 53,329 310 Civic Facilities Capital Projects 2,939,745 _ 6,000 2,945,745 0 2,945,745 311 Street Capital Improvement 2011+ 1,084,681 2,200 1,086,881 1,086,881 0 402 Stormwater Management 1,236,400 1,908,667 3,145,067 2,153,441 991,626 403 Aquifer Protection Area 500,000 502,500 1,002,500 I 0 1,002,500 501 Equipment Rental&Replacement 706,379 100,000 806,379 _ 0 806,379 502 !Risk Management 20,420 319,000 339,420 1 319,000 20,420 Total of all Funds 45,591,634 54,824,894 100,416,528 56,969,201 43,447,327 OPTIONS: State law requires the City to adopt a budget prior to December 31. Council may adopt the budget as presented or alter it as they collectively deem necessary. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to approve Ordinance No. 11-017 adopting the 2012 Budget. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Adoption of Ordinance No. 11-017 concludes the 2012 Budget development process and establishes the final budget including estimated revenues and appropriations. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Calhoun, Finance Director ATTACHMENTS: o Ordinance No. 11-017 o 11-year history of CPI o 2010 to 2011 CPI Comparison o Power Point presentation o 2012 Proposed Budget P:IClerklAgendaPackets for Weblagendapacket 11-15-1111tem 2 RCA 2nd reading of Ordinance 11-017.docx P:\Clerk\AgendaPackets for Web\agendapacket 11-15-11\CPI history History of CPI as Published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics 10/19/2011 and Social Security COLAs for the years 2001 through 2011 July to July-'U.S. City Average Year 1 CPI-U 1 CPI-W :' Social Security CPI increase: 2012 n/a n/a For calendar year 2012 3.6 2011 3.6 4.1 For calendar year 2011 0.0 2010 1.2 1.6 For calendar year 2010 0.0 2009 -2.1 -2.7 For calendar year 2009 5.8 2008 5.6 6.2 For calendar year 2008 2.3 2007 2.4 2.3 For calendar year 2007 3.3 2006 4.1 4.3 For calendar year 2006 4.1 2005 3.2 3.3 For calendar year 2005 2.7 2004 3.0 3.0 For calendar year 2004 2.1 2003 2.1 2.0 For calendar year 2003 1.4 2002 1.5 1.3 For calendar year 2002 2.6 2001 2.7 2.6 For calendar year 2001 3.5 average 2.4818 2,5455 average 2.6167 According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics CPI-U =All Urban Consumers The CPI-U measures consumer inflation for all U.S. residents of urban areas,which accounts for about 87% of the U.S. population. CPI-W= Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers The CPI-W measures consumer price inflation for a subset of the CPI-U population: residents of ubran areas who live in households that: receive more than half of their income from clerical or wage occupations, and have one earner employed for at least 37 weeks during the previous 12 months. The CPI-W covers about 32 percent of the U.S. population. The CPI-U is the most commonly used index because it has the broadest population coverage, However,the CPI-W is used sometimes to make cost-of-living adjustments for labor contracts. CPI comp P:\Clerk\AgendaPackets for Web\agendapacket 11-15-11\CPI history CPI as Published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics 10/19/2011 Comparing Change from 2010 to 2011 U.S. City Average . CPI-U 1 CPI-W. .. January 2010 to January 2011 1.6 1.8 February 2010 to February 2011 2.1 2.3 March 2010 to March 2011 2.7 3.0 April 2010 to April 2011 3.2 3.6 May 2010 to May 2011 3.6 4.1 June 2010 to June 2011 3.6 4.1 July 2010 to July 2011 3.6 4.1 August 2010 to August 2011 3.8 4.3 September 2010 to September 2011 3.9 4.4 I 2011 CPI City of Spokane Valley 2012 Budget Adoption Second Reading Ordinance #11 -017 November 15 , 2011 2012 Budget Summary All Funds Total appropriations for all City Funds of $57.0 million including $11 .3 million in capital expenditures. Budgets will be adopted across 21 separate funds. Budget will include a new Aquifer Protection Area Fund. FTE count will remain unchanged at 87.25 employees. 2012 operating expenditure increases have been held at or below 1 % over 2011 . Street Fund budget includes an additional $500,000 for street preservation, plus an additional $100,000 to be set aside for future replacements of snow plows. 11/10/2011 2 General Fund EXPENDITURES: 2012 Appropriations of $35, 196,500, including: $34,660,900 in recurring expenditures. $ 535,600 in nonrecurring expenditures: An $89,000 interfund transfer for Street Capital Proj. A $100,000 interfund transfer for Park Capital Proj. A $346,600 contingency/emergency appropriation that represents 1 % of recurring expenditures. General Fund REVENUES: Total recurring 2012 revenues of $34,908,800 2 largest sources are Sales Tax and Property Tax which are collectively estimated to account for 77% of 2012 General Fund revenues. Sales Tax is estimated at $16.2 million — identical to 2011 . A Property Tax levy estimated at $10,808,900 which: Includes property taxes assessed on new construction. But does not take advantage of the 1 % increase in the 2011 levy that is authorized by Initiative #747. 11/10/2011 4 DRAFT CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY SPOKANE COUNTY,WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 11-017 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING A BUDGET FOR THE PERIOD JANUARY 1, 2012 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2012; APPROPRIATING FUNDS, CREATING A NEW FUND (403): AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA; ESTABLISHING SALARY SCHEDULES FOR ESTABLISHED POSITIONS;AND OTHER MATTERS RELATING THERETO. WHEREAS, State law requires the City Manager to prepare a preliminary budget for the City of Spokane Valley at least sixty (60) days before the beginning of the City fiscal year beginning January 1, 2012 and ending December 31,2012; and WHEREAS, the City Manager in consultation with the Finance Director and Department Heads has prepared and placed on file with the City Clerk a preliminary budget, together with an estimate of the amount of money necessary to meet the expenses of the City including payment of outstanding obligations; and WHEREAS, notice was posted and published for public hearings held on August 23, September 27 and October 11,2011. The City Council met and received public comment in the City Council Chambers during each public hearing; and WHEREAS, following the filing of the preliminary budget with the City Clerk, notice of the same and three hearings on the budget, the City Council desires to adopt the 2012 budget, including all allowances and an appropriation for each fund is adopted for the City,and WHEREAS, the City of Spokane Valley property tax levy for 2011 for collection in 2012, will be $10,732,863, which represents a 0% increase in the 2012 levy. This levy is exclusive of additional revenue resulting from new construction, improvements to property, any increase in the value of State assessed property,any annexations that have occurred,and refunds made. NOW,THEREFORE,the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley do ordain as follows: Section 1. Adoption of 2012 Budget. The budget for the City of Spokane Valley for the year 2012 is adopted at the fund level. The final budget for 2012 is attached hereto and by this reference is incorporated herein pursuant to RCW 35A.33.075. For summary purposes, the total estimated appropriations for each separate fund plus the aggregate total for all such funds is set forth as follows: Item 2 ordinance 11-017 adopt 2012 budget Page 1 of 2 DRAFT Estimated Estimate d Beginning Ending Fund Fund Fund Estimated Total Fund No. Title Balance Revenues Sources Appropriations Balance 001 General 26,633,061 34,908,800 61,541,861 _35,196,500 26,345,361 101 Street O&M 1,834,574 4,902,800 6,737,374 5,431,263 1,306,111 103 Paths&Trails 36,186 8,000 44,186 0 44,186 105 Hotel/Motel Tax 253,356 430,700 684,056 430,700 253,356 120 CenterPlace Operating Reserve 353,231 700 353,931 0 353,931 121 Service Level Stabilization 5,477,795 10,000 5,487,795 0 5,487,795 122 Winter Weather Reserve 506,168 700 506,868 0 506,868 123 City Facilities Repair&Replacement 2,027,259 399,000 2,426,259 0 2,426,259 204 'Debt Service LTGO 03 0 617,623 617,623 617,623 0 301 Capital Projects 194,277 475,400 669,677 456,279 213,398 302 Special Capital Projects 1,547,015 477,000 2,024,015 1,540,710 483,305 303 Street Capital Projects 73,456 9,655,804 9,729,260 9,566,804 162,456 304 Mirabeau Projects 44,302 0 44,302 0 44,302 309 Parks Capital Projects 123,329 100,000 223,329 170,000 53,329 310 Civic Facilities Capital Projects 2,939,745 6,000 2,945,745 0 2,945,745 311 Street Capital Improvement 2011+ 1,084,681 2,200 1,086,881 1,086,881 0 402 Stormwater Management 1,236,400 1,908,667 3,145,067 2,153,441 991,626 403 Aquifer Protection Area 500,000 502,500 1,002,500 0 1,002,500 501 Equipment Rental&Replacement 706,379 100,000 806,379 0 806,379 502 Risk Management 20,420 319,000 339,420 319,000 20,420 Total of all Funds 45,591,634 54,824,894 100,416,528 56,969,201 43,447,327 The total balance of all funds appropriated for 2012 is$56,969,201. Section 2. Creating Fund 403. There is hereby created Fund 403 Aquifer Protection Area Fund which will be used solely for projects or other activities that specifically protect the aquifer as defined in RCW 36.36.040. Section 3. Transmittal of Budget. A complete copy of the budget as adopted, together with a copy of this Ordinance shall be transmitted by the City Clerk to the Division of Municipal Corporations in the Office of the State Auditor and the Association of Washington Cities. Section 4. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance shall be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence,clause or phrase of this ordinance. Section 5. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect five (5) days after the date of publication of this Ordinance or a summary thereof in the official newspaper of the City. PASSED by the City Council this 15th day of November 2011. ATTEST: Thomas E. Towey,Mayor Christine Bainbridge,City Clerk Date of Publication: Approved As To Form: Effective Date: Office of the City Attorney Item 2 ordinance 11-017 adopt 2012 budget Page 2 of 2 2012 City of Spokane Valley 1. rd •yam +.nr.►+r \\16: ot". 1111, ON I r. PROPOSED BUDGET AS OF OCTOBER 25,2011 MIKE JACKSON-CITY MANAGER MARK CALHOUN- FINANCE DIRECTOR �00000000000000000000000� > > > > 4 > id City of Spokane Valley, Washington > > k > > Annual Budget > P > > > ■ > > IIrr > > 'lip For the Fiscal Year > > I > ,111 > IK� > Ili'. >> l!''' January 1, 2012 through December 31, 2012 > > > > > > fl > VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV Table of Contents City of Spokane Valley Spokane County January 1, 2012 through December 31, 2012 Council members City Manager's Budget Message 1 About the 2012 Budget and Budget Development Process 9 Budget Summary 19 Revenues by Type 34 Expenditures by Department 41 Capital Projects & Special Capital Projects Funds 76 Capital Expenditures for 2012 86 FTE Count by Year 87 Work Force Comparison 88 Appendix A, Employee Position Classification 89 Glossary of Budget Terms 90 • illiTilit - • • &.- rr • • 1 , -1 • • . .,. • • • • _ • • • • •City Council Members i • • • • • • • • • • •• This page intentional)Y• le b • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• S1FkiI1be alle y City Manager's Budget Message Annual Budget For Fiscal Year 2012 Dear Citizens, Mayor and City Council of Spokane Valley: I am pleased to present the attached 2012 proposed budget for the City of Spokane Valley. In a continuing trend of local and national economic challenge, the City of Spokane Valley has benefitted from a history of prudent financial decisions. Careful budgeting and restrained spending has left us almost unique among cities in providing a proposed balanced budget with neither service reductions nor tax increases. City Council has been heavily involved in the direction leading to this proposed budget by adopting strong, fiscally conservative policies and by working with staff throughout the process to ensure that both policy makers and administrative staff were in concert. Especially important to this process was a budget workshop on June 14, 2011. The draft budget worksheets were reviewed line by line and the impacts of proposed reductions were discussed in detail. The staff and Council solidified the basic fiscal policies (some carried over from 2011 and some new) which will determine the 2012 Budget and guide future spending practices. The Fiscal Policies adopted by the City Council are an extremely important element in this long range budget view. These policies appropriately dictate that if the economic situation deteriorates even more than anticipated, additional future reductions may be triggered. Such reductions were made in adopting the 2011 budget, and are not being restored. The current budget forecasts give us hope that future reductions or service cuts will not be necessary. That noted, elected officials and the staff remain committed to ensuring that service levels are commensurate with the revenue sources currently in place and to making adjustments if necessary to keep the City's finances healthy. The City also has reserves which may be needed in future years. With few exceptions for non- recurring expenses, we have not tapped into those reserves to balance our general fund. During each budget cycle, the City will review the reserve balance and determine if additional budget cuts will be more judicious than subsidizing the general fund through reserves. 1 10/18/11 Fiscal Policies Financial Management— The City proposes to: 1. Maintain basic service levels with reduced resources 2. Minimize personnel costs/overhead by continuing to contract for many services 3. Continue the 6-year Business Plan process 4. Leverage City funds with grant opportunities 5. Minimize City debt with a pay as you go philosophy • The State of Washington sets the maximum level of allowable debt for cities based on assessed value of property. The City of Spokane Valley currently utilizes only 1.52% of its total allowable debt capacity, and more importantly, only 7.61% of non-voted bond capacity. This is extremely low debt. Financial Objectives -The City's financial objectives through 2015 are: 1. Maintain a minimum general fund ending balance of 15% of revenues through 2015 2. Maintain the Service Level Stabilization Fund at the current level of $5.4 million through 2014 3. On an ongoing basis, transfer to the Street Capital Fund, 40% of the ending fund balance which exceeds $26 million. This will be done in the first quarter of each year following reconciliation of the previous year's books. This preserves the City's $26 million ending fund balance while also funding a portion of street capital projects from the General Fund. 4. Hold 2012 property taxes at essentially the same amount as the 2011 levy with no proposed increase in the levy other than for new construction. We anticipate this will result in a $10,808,900 levy in 2012. Commitment — By committing to these objectives, the City will ensure financial sustainability through 2015 and into the future. The City can achieve this by: 1. Capping 2012 recurring expenses to a maximum 1% increase over 2011. (Notably, 2012 expenditures have been reduced below 2011 levels). Challenges — Beyond the General Fund, the City of Spokane Valley has three primary financial concerns: 1. Funding the Street Preservation Plan to maintain City streets 2. Funding Street Capital projects 3. Funding Parks Capital projects 2 1 0/1 8/1 1 The new budget format for 2012 divides expenses into recurring and non-recurring categories. This was done to delineate the recurring or "ongoing" expenses of the City and to clearly show that current year recurring expenses are matched to current year revenues. Any/all use of the ending fund balance is specifically documented. Also, in deviation from the past, the 2012 proposed budget does not appropriate the ending fund balance in the general fund. This provides an added margin of security and will require formal council action to spend funds from the ending fund balance. Accompanied with this,we have proposed a 1% general fund contingency. Budget Highlights The 2012 Budget recognizes the economic realities of our times and the necessity to continue to operate within our financial means. The budget process has been used to reinforce the City's commitment to delivering its core services in a cost effective manner. A summary of key budget highlights for review by the Council and the community follows: Budget Reductions: Our 2012 General Fund budget recurring expenditures have decreased from 2011 by $164,186. This deserves recognition. We are essentially maintaining the same service levels - including no reduction in law enforcement - during a period of about 3.6 % inflation in June and July, while at the same time, we are funding important additions to our services such as the new 8 acre Greenacres City Park and televised council meetings. Staffing Levels: Staffing levels were reduced by 9.5 full-time and 2 temporary unfilled positions in 2011. For 2012 we remain at this same reduced level, operating a city of 90,1101 residents with a staff of 87.25 employees. Even taking into consideration that we contract for police services, and are served by Fire Districts and a Library District, we are operating substantially below the normal employee count for a major city. Cost of Living Adjustments: Union represented employees and employees who are not represented by the union- Local 270-V AFSME -will receive a 2.5% Cost of Living Adjustment in 2012. This amount was agreed to by the City in the 2010 — 2012 contract with union employees. The City has historically provided identical wage and benefit terms to non-represented employees; however, in 2011 non-represented employees did not receive an increase. The 2.5% matches the inflation trend over the past 20 years and was considered to be a prudent and reliable method of calculating cost of living increases and was preferred over a "floating" rate that would be determined each year. This methodology may change in future years. Street Capital Improvement Fund: Established in 2011, the current budgeted amount in this fund is $1,086,881. 1 Washington State Department of Financial Management,April 1,2011. 3 1 0/1 8/1 1 No Increase in Property Tax Levy: The City of Spokane Valley will hold its property tax levy equal with 2011. This decrease in the City's property tax levy is in recognition that the City understands the difficult financial times faced by our citizens. Moderate Growth in Current Operational Expenses: Investing in the essential core services identified by the Council and community creates baseline costs. Similar to the trend in most jurisdictions, costs and demands for service are growing while tax revenues are decreasing. Even with a relatively small city staff, quality service delivery requires ongoing investment in basic capacity to provide efficient operations. Moderate as it may be, operational expenses cannot continue to increase during declining or flat revenue. The City can either subsidize operational expenses with reserves, or husband their reserves and make additional budget reductions. Other Notable 2012 Budget Items Include: • The opening of Greenacres Park at Long and Boone in the spring of 2012 (paid for through direct appropriations of State funds and City capital funds). The 2012 budget reflects an increase of $100,000 to maintain this facility on an annual basis • Initiated by private citizens in 2010, the 2012 budget includes the first full year of televised City Council meetings with City equipment and contracted production costs of $46,000. The equipment was purchased through Comcast Public, Educational and Government funding. Public Safety Costs: In 2012, the Police, Court and Jail related services proposed budget is $22 million—an amount equal to 204% of anticipated property tax collections ($10,808,900) for the entire year. Council has made a commitment not to reduce public safety service levels and associated costs in 2012. 4 1 0/1 8/1 1 Progress on 2011 Budget Goals Include: • Continued Shoreline Master Program work as required by state law • Passage of HB 1922 requiring cattle trucks to go through the Washington Port of Entry • Support for Spokane Valley Partners in their successful bid for $100,000 from the Washington Legislature for a new sprinkler system in their facility • After reevaluation, the Sprague and Appleway Corridors Subarea Plan was removed from the Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan • Monitoring of the wastewater goal will be complete by the end of this year if Spokane County is issued their Wastewater permit • The multi-year winter roads maintenance plan has been implemented which included the purchase of equipment and a maintenance facility • A range of options was discussed for a city hall at or near CenterPlace Challenges: Grants and Declining Matching Funds: City staff actively pursues funding commitments from other sources to help pay the cost of needed capital improvements—roads, bridges and parks—that benefit the community. The 2011 capital construction program totaled $11,525,343 with $5,538,819 (48%) coming from outside sources. The 2012 budget projects a total capital construction budget of$11,263,685 with $7,755,118 (65%) coming from outside sources. When the City applies for state and federal grants, the City must provide its share (match) for these projects. In the past, Real Estate Excise Tax was used for most of the City match. However, during the last five years, this tax has declined from $2.5 million to $1 million, leaving a potential shortage of local match depending on availability of Federal, State and Local grants. Local Street Maintenance Combination of Funding: This fund derives its revenues from an allocation of the State Motor Fuel Tax distributed to cities and towns, and a 6% city tax on telephone usage, estimated in 2012 at$1,897,800 and $3,000,000 respectively. There is also an anticipated $2,004,874 Beginning Fund Balance that will carry over into 2012. Therefore, the combination of Fuel Tax and Telephone Utility Tax is able to meet the ongoing need for these funds to pay for street maintenance activities like snow plowing, pothole repair, resurfacing eroded lanes, sweeping, weed control, street lighting, traffic signals and a variety of other repairs/improvements. While Fuel Tax and Telephone Utility Tax cover annual street maintenance, they do not provide for implementation of the Street Master Plan and therein lies the challenge. 5 1 0/1 8/1 1 In an attempt to determine how best to keep the surfaces and bases (underground support) of roads in proper condition, a Street Master Plan was prepared that itemizes the positive and negative conditions of our city street system, and identifies the repair needs and costs associated with maintaining our 437 miles of roadway. The report details the need for an additional annual investment of $4.3 million in street preservation work to keep the street system from deteriorating and triggering much more expensive repair work in the future. The Current Fiscal Year in Review The City purchased camera and broadcasting equipment and began televising Council meetings live via the Internet in 2011. The new system also stores council meetings on the City website for use by the citizens or staff. Residents and business people continue to provide city officials with their views on the broad range of issues related to economic development and land use regulations. A series of public meetings, Planning Commission meetings and Council actions were set in motion to review the Sprague/Appleway Revitalization Plan (SARP) and ultimately, the SARP was removed from the City's Comprehensive Plan. In addition, City codes such as signage, landscaping and others were reviewed to help support the development and retention of local business. The City also began exploring a more active role in the economic development of our City. The City Council welcomes public comments and works to balance the various interests expressed when enacting ordinances intended for the protection and enhancement of the quality of life in Spokane Valley. City representatives embrace continuous public participation, attend to a heavy workload, and take pleasure in achieving results that affect the community in positive ways. A review of the events and accomplishments of 2011 also reveals the following: • Funds were utilized from the Civic Facilities Fund to pay for full width paving and paving of gravel roads in conjunction with the County sewer projects in Spokane Valley. 2011 marked the last major construction year of the Septic Tank Replacement Program in Spokane Valley. • Council approved the purchase of a street and strormwater maintenance facility to house City operations. • Construction of a picnic shelter was completed in Terrace View Park. • Spokane Valley agreed to assist Airway Heights on an ongoing basis with plan reviews. • Several new businesses located in Spokane Valley in 2011. 6 1 0/1 8/1 1 The Budget for Fiscal Year 2012 Balanced Budget Adopted: One of the most important tests of fiscal management is the ability of a municipal enterprise to maintain basic services during an economic downturn. The creation and maintenance of financial reserves since incorporation have served their intended purpose and provided the opportunity for Spokane Valley to sustain critical public services during the turbulent economic conditions of 2011. The 2012 budget reflects a continuation of service delivery capabilities during difficult and uncertain economic times. The 2012 budget is in balance. Expenses have been balanced with known or reasonably predictable revenues. The budget is designed to maintain the healthy, positive fund balance at year end that provides for the city's cash flow needs without costly borrowing. In pursuit of fiscal responsibility, special attention was given to limiting the growth in new programs and financial commitments, while City revenue and expenditure patterns further fluctuate with the economy. This approach allows available resources to be put toward sustaining services that are consistent with the City Council's priorities for 2012 and beyond. Since incorporation, this City has taken a conservative approach to adding new staff. Spokane Valley continues to have the lowest employee count of any Washington city with 50,000 or more in population. A 2011 Work Force Comparison chart is included in the budget document. By all comparisons, the City of Spokane Valley is a lean, productive City government. Major Goal Statements for 2012: The 2012 budget reflects the distribution of resources consistent with the Council's core services priorities. The following goals, some of which are continued from 2011, represent broad areas of concentration important to the well being of the community: • Continue monitoring wastewater issues, including governance of wastewater facilities, and pursuit of the most efficient and economical methods to ensure the continuation of wastewater discharge licenses. • Pursue the topic of Solid Waste, to include identifying the issues and obtaining alternatives of joining the consortium or handling it ourselves and the consequences of each alternative. • Review and evaluate development regulations and compare with surrounding cities. • Develop a Shoreline Master Program to provide appropriate regulatory protection for waters of statewide significance as required by state statute. • Pursue a legislative capital budget request—to be identified. • Create an economic development plan including options for a new city hall. 7 10/18/11 Future Concepts: The budget process is not static and Council, the citizens, and staff must remain vigilant to watch for economic trends that impact current forecasts. Even as we adopt a 2012 budget, we must keep in mind the future economic opportunities and threats that may impact our multi-year forecast. An example of potential impacts and adaptive future concepts are as follows: • A commitment by Management to review all vacant positions prior to filling them. (In some cases, positions must be filled quickly due to workload.) • By all indications, the economic recovery of the U.S. and its collective states, counties and cities will be a slow and deliberate process. The City of Spokane Valley does not predict measureable growth in property tax or sales tax revenues through 2015 and we are budgeting with that in mind. • Because it represents about 63% of the General Fund budget, achieving future budget reductions without impacting Law Enforcement and other Public Safety services will be challenging. Acknowledgments: I would like to acknowledge the City Council and the Staff for a long history of conservative spending and prudent fiscal planning. The City of Spokane Valley is in an enviable position in relation to other Federal, State and local entities. We are not facing 2012 budget shortfalls. Although we must continue to budget and spend wisely, we do not have to make drastic cuts in services to balance our 2012 budget. By saving and conserving the taxpayers' money, and by adopting prudent long-term fiscal policies, the City can balance its budget for many years to come. This is something which is easy to say, but hard to do. Even harder is to forgo property tax increases in the face of declining revenues. However, the City Council felt this reduction was important to reflect to the citizens that we are a City that understands and appreciates the difficult economic times we all face together. Finally, I would like to say how rewarding it has been to work with the City Council and the staff in developing the budget, achieving substantial reductions and exceeding expectations for budget reductions in 2012. The City Council and the Finance Committee have set a path to ensure the long-term financial sustainability of the City. The management staff and employees have worked together to develop Business Plans and 2012 budget recommendations that achieve Council's goal of sustainability. We continue to demonstrate in difficult financial times that we can work together as an organization in the best interest of the citizens. Respectfully, Mike Jackson City Manager 8 1 0/1 8/1 1 S pokane 410000 \TaIle 11707 E Sprague Ave Suite 106 • Spokane Valley WA 99206 509.921.1000 • Fax: 509.921.1008 • cityhall@spokanevalley.org TO: City Manager and Members of the City Council FROM: Mark Calhoun,Finance Director SUBJECT: About the 2012 Budget and Budget Development Process The budget includes the financial planning and legal authority to obligate public funds. Additionally, the budget provides significant policy direction by the City Council to the staff and community. As a result, the City Council, staff and public are involved in establishing the budget for the City of Spokane Valley. The budget serves four functions: 1. It is a Policy Document The budget functions as a policy document in that the decisions made within the budget will reflect the general principles or plans that guide the actions taken for the future.As a policy document,the budget makes specific attempts to link desired goals and policy direction to the actual day-to-day activities of the City staff. 2. It is an Operational Guide The budget of the City reflects its operation. Activities of each City function and organization have been planned, debated, formalized, and described in the following sections. This process will help to maintain an understanding of the various operations of the City and how they relate to each other and to the attainment of the policy issues and goals of the City Council. 3. It is a Link with the General Public The budget provides a unique opportunity to allow and encourage public review of City operations. The budget describes the activities of the City,the reason or cause for those activities,future implications, and the direct relationship to the citizenry. 4. It is a Legally Required Financial Planning Tool The budget is a financial planning tool, which has been its most traditional use. In this light, preparing and adopting a budget is a State law requirement of all cities as stated in Title 35A of the Revised Code of Washington (RCW). The budget must be adopted as a balanced budget and must be in place prior to the beginning of the City's fiscal year. The budget is the legal authority to expend public moneys and controls those expenditures by limiting the amount of the appropriation at the fund level. The revenues of the City are estimated, along with available cash carry-forward,to indicate funds available. The budget takes into account unforeseen contingencies and provides for the need for periodic adjustments. 9 10/18/11 2012 BUDGET DEVELOPMENT PROCESS Historically the City has utilized a budgeting approach that assumed for most functions of government that the current year's budget was indicative of the base required for the following year. However, with the downturn in the economy and resultant reduction in revenues (most notably the decline in sales taxes), both the 2011 and 2012 Budget development processes were amended to consciously review service levels in each department and determine the appropriate level of funding that meets Council goals relative to available resources. The 2012 Budget development process began at the February 8, 2011 Council Retreat where among other topics, Council and Staff discussed the budget in general terms. In early April 2011 the Finance Department notified City Departments that their 2012 revenue and expenditure estimates were due by May 6. Through the balance of May and early June, the Finance Department then worked to prepare budget worksheets that were communicated to the City Council at a Budget Retreat held on June 14, 2011. Following the retreat,the Finance Department continued work on the budget including refinements of revenue and expenditure estimates and through July and early August the Finance Department and City Manager reviewed updated budget projections. By the time the 2012 Budget is scheduled to be adopted on November 15, 2011,the Council will have had an opportunity to discuss it on eight separate occasions, including three public hearings to gather input from citizens: June 14 Council Budget Retreat August 9 Administrative Report: Estimated 2012 revenues and expenditures August 23 Public hearing on 2012 revenues September 6 City Manager's presentation of preliminary 2012 Budget September 27 Public hearing#1 on 2012 Budget October 11 Public hearing#2 on 2012 Budget October 25 First reading of proposed ordinance adopting the 2012 Budget November 15 Second reading of proposed ordinance adopting the 2012 Budget Once adopted,the final operating budget is published,distributed,and made available to the public during the first three months of the following year. After the budget is adopted, the City enters a budget implementation and monitoring stage. Throughout the year, expenditures are monitored by the Finance Department and department directors to ensure that funds are within the approved budget. Finance provides the City Council with monthly reports to keep them current with the City's financial condition. Any budget amendments made during the year are adopted by City Council ordinance. The City Manager is authorized to transfer budgeted amounts within a fund; however, any revisions that alter the total expenditures of a fund, or that affect the number of authorized employee positions, salary ranges or other conditions of employment must be approved by the City Council. When the City Council determines that it is in the best interest of the City to increase or decrease the appropriation for a particular fund, it may do so by ordinance adopted by Council after holding one public hearing. 10 10/18/11 BUDGET PRINCIPLES • Department directors have primary responsibility for formulating budget proposals in line with City Council and City Manager priority direction,and for implementing them once they are approved. • The Finance Department is responsible for coordinating the overall preparation and administration of the City's budget. This function is fulfilled in compliance with applicable State of Washington statutes governing local government budgeting practices. • The Finance Department assists department staff in identifying budget problems, formulating solutions and alternatives,and implementing any necessary corrective actions. • Interfund charges will be based on recovery of costs associated with providing those services. • Budget adjustments requiring City Council approval will occur through the ordinance process at the fund level prior to fiscal year end. • The City's budget presentation will be directed at displaying the City's services plan in a Council/constituent friendly format. • Short term debt shall not exceed 10% of revenues. No long term debt will be incurred without identification of a revenue source to repay the debt. Long term debt will be incurred for capital purposes only. • The City will strive to maintain equipment replacement funds in an amount necessary to replace the equipment at the end of its useful life. Life cycle assumptions and required contributions will be reviewed annually as part of the budget process. New operations in difficult economic times may make it difficult to fund this principle in some years. • The City will pursue an ending general fund balance at a level of no less than 15%of revenue. BASIS OF ACCOUNTING AND BUDGETING Accounting Accounting records for the City are maintained in accordance with methods prescribed by the State Auditor under the authority of the Revised Code of Washington (RCW), Chapter 43.09.20, and in compliance with generally accepted accounting principles as set forth by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board. Basis of Presentation-Fund Accounting The accounts of the City of Spokane Valley are organized on the basis of funds,each of which is considered a separate accounting entity. Each fund is accounted for with a separate set of double-entry accounts that comprise its assets, liabilities, fund equity, revenues and expenditures or expenses, as appropriate. The City's resources are allocated to and accounted for in individual funds depending on their intended purpose. The following are the fund types used by the City of Spokane Valley: Governmental Fund Types Governmental funds are used to account for activities typically associated with state and local government operations. All governmental fund types are accounted for on a spending or "financial flows" measurement focus, which means that typically only current assets and current liabilities are included on related balance sheets. The operating statements of governmental funds measure changes in financial position,rather than net income. They present increases(revenues and other fmancing sources) and decreases (expenditures and other 11 1 0/1 8/1 1 financing uses) in net current assets. There are four governmental fund types used by the City of Spokane Valley: 1. General Fund This fund is the primary fund of the City of Spokane Valley. It accounts for all financial resources except those required or elected to be accounted for in another fund. 2. Special Revenue Funds These funds account for revenues that are legally restricted or designated to finance particular activities of the City of Spokane Valley. Special Revenue funds include the Street Fund, Arterial Street Fund, Trails & Paths Fund, Hotel/Motel Fund, CenterPlace Operating Reserve Fund, Service Level Reserve Fund, Civic Facilities Reserve Fund,and Winter Weather Reserve Fund. 3. Debt Service Funds These funds account for financial resources which are designated for the retirement of debt. Debt Service Funds are comprised of the Debt Service LTGO 03. 4. Capital Project Funds These funds account for financial resources, which are designated for the acquisition or construction of general government capital projects. Capital Project Funds include the Capital Project Fund, Special Capital Projects Fund, Streets Capital Projects Fund, CDBG Fund, Capital Grants Fund, Barker Bridge Federal Grant Fund,and Parks Capital Projects Fund. Proprietary Fund Types Proprietary funds are used to account for activities similar to those found in the private sector where the intent of the governing body is to finance the full cost of providing services, including depreciation, which based on the commercial model uses a flow of economic resources approach. Under this approach, the operating statements for the proprietary funds focus on a measurement of net income (revenues and expenses) and both current and non-current assets and liabilities are reported on related balance sheets. Their reported fund equity (net total assets) is segregated into contributed capital and retained earnings components.As described below,there are two generic fund types in this category: 1. Enterprise Funds These funds account for operations that provide goods or services to the general public and are supported primarily by user charges. The Stormwater Management Fund is included in this group of funds. 2. Internal Service Funds These funds account for operations that provide goods or services to other departments or funds of the City. The Equipment Rental and Replacement Fund and Risk Management Fund are included in this group of funds. Basis of Accounting Basis of accounting refers to when revenues and expenditures are recognized in the accounts and reported in the financial statements. The City of Spokane Valley uses a modified accrual basis of accounting for all governmental funds. Modified accrual recognizes revenues when they become both measurable and available to finance expenditures of the current period. The basis of accounting for enterprise and internal service funds is full accrual where revenues and expenses are recognized in the period incurred rather than when cash is either received or disbursed. The appropriate basis is used throughout the budgeting, accounting,and reporting processes. 12 10/18/11 In this method, for example, an asset is depreciated as it is "used up," and the expense is recognized in periodic increments, rather than assuming the asset holds its value until it is actually disposed of. However, since the focus of budgeting is on the revenue and expense accounts, depreciation and amortization are not considered budgetary accounts,and are excluded from the budgeting system. Budgets and Budgetary Accounting Annual appropriated budgets are adopted for all funds. These funds are budgeted on the modified cash basis of accounting. The financial statements include budgetary comparisons for those funds. Budgets are adopted at the fund level that constitutes the legal authority for expenditures. Annual appropriations for all funds lapse at the fiscal period end. EXPLANATION OF MAJOR REVENUE SOURCES General Fund • Property Tax Property taxes play an essential role in the finances of the municipal budget. State law limits the City to a $3.60 levy per $1,000 assessed valuation, deducting from there the levy of$1.50 by the Spokane County Fire Districts #1 and #8, along with deducting $0.50 for library levies, which leaves the City with the authority to levy $1.60 for its own purposes. The levy amount must be established by ordinance by November 30th prior to the levy year. • Local Retail Sales and Use Tax The local retail sales and use tax is comprised of two separate .5% options for a total of 1.0%. The Washington State Department of Revenue disburses 15% of the City sales tax to Spokane County, and 85%to the City. • Criminal Justice Sales Tax Local Sales Tax for Criminal Justice funding is to be used solely for criminal justice purposes, such as the City's law enforcement contract. This tax is authorized at 1/10 of 1% of retail sales transacted in the County. Of the total amount collected, the State distributes 10% of the receipts to Spokane County, with the remainder allocated on a per capita basis to the County and cities within the County. • Public Safety Sales Tax Beginning in 2005, an additional .1% voter approved increase in sales tax was devoted to public safety purposes. This .1%was approved by the voters again in August 2009. Of the total amount collected,the State distributes 60% of the receipts to Spokane County, with the remainder allocated on a per capita basis to the cities within the County. • Gambling Tax Gambling tax revenues must be spent primarily on law enforcement purposes pertaining to gambling. Funds remaining after necessary expenditures for such enforcement purposes may be used for any general government purpose. Gambling taxes are to be paid quarterly to the City, no later than the last day of January, April, July and October. The City imposes a tax on the following forms of gambling at the following rates: Bingo (5% gross, less prizes); Raffles (5% gross, less prizes); Games (2% gross, less prizes); Card playing (10% gross). • Leasehold Excise Tax Taxes on property owned by state or local governments and leased to private parties(City's share). 13 10/18/11 • Franchise Fees Cable TV is the only franchise fee levied in the City at a rate of 5%of gross revenues. This is a fee levied on private utilities for the right to use city streets,alleys,and other public properties. • State-Shared Revenues State-shared revenues are received from liquor sales, and motor vehicle excise taxes. These taxes are collected by the State of Washington and shared with local governments based on population. State- shared revenues are distributed on either a monthly or quarterly basis, although not all quarterly revenues are distributed in the same month of the quarter. • The 2011 population figure used in the 2012 Preliminary Budget is 90,110 as reported by the Office of Financial Management for Washington State on April 1,2011. This figure is important when determining distribution of State shared revenues on a per capita basis. • Liquor Board Profits and Liquor Excise Tax Since cities are responsible for the policing of liquor establishments located within their limits, but are precluded from taxing them because of the State liquor monopoly, State law provides that a share of the State-collected profits and taxes be returned to cities to help defray policing costs. Liquor Board profits consist of the difference between revenue generated by the Washington State Liquor Control Board and the board's expenditures, specific revenues collected for a dedicated purpose, and administrative fees attributable to specific licensees that serve hard alcohol. Revenues are generated from sales at State liquor stores, taxes collected on wine and beer manufacture and distribution, licensee fees, alcohol related permit fees, penalties, and forfeitures. Liquor profits are divided among the State, counties and cities. Cities get a 40% share, with additional amount distributed to border area cities. These funds are distributed on the last days of March,June, September and December. • Cities also receive 28% of the liquor excise tax receipts. These funds are distributed on the last days of January,April,July and October. • Service Revenues Fees are charged for services rendered by the City of Spokane Valley. Most of the fees in the General Fund are construction inspections and permits related to services such as planning,zoning and building. • Fines and Forfeitures Fines and penalties are collected as a result of Municipal Court rulings and other miscellaneous rule infractions. All court fines and penalties are shared with the State, with the City, on average, retaining less than 50%of the amount collected. • Recreation Program Fees The Parks and Recreation Department charges fees for selected recreation programs. These fees offset direct costs related to providing the program. • CenterPlace Fees The Parks and Recreation Department charges fees for use of CenterPlace. Uses include regional meetings, weddings, receptions and banquets. Rental rooms include classrooms, the great room and dining rooms. 14 10/18/11 • Investment Interest The City earns investment interest on sales tax money held by the State of Washington prior to their distribution of the taxes to the City as well as on City initiated investments. Street Fund • Motor Vehicle Fuel Excise Tax(gas tax) The State of Washington collects a $.3750 per gallon motor vehicle fuel tax at the pump and remits $.0296 of the tax back to cities based on population. In 2012 the Municipal Research and Services Center estimates the per capita distribution back to cities will be $21.15 per person. Based upon a City of Spokane Valley population of 90,110 (per the Washington State Office of Financial Management on April 1, 2011)we anticipate the City will collect $1,905,800 in 2012. With the exception of.42% of the collections which must go towards paths and trails activities, all motor vehicle fuel taxes are credited to the Street Fund. • Telephone Utility Tax The City of Spokane Valley levied a 6% telephone utility tax via Ordinance #08-014 with collections beginning in 2009. Companies providing this service pay the tax to the City monthly. Telephone tax has been estimated at$3 million for 2011. Paths& Trails Fund Cities are required to spend .42% of the motor vehicle fuel tax receipts on paths and trails. Because the amount collected in any given year is relatively small it is typical to accumulate State distributions for several years until adequate dollars are available for a project. Hotel/Motel Tax Fund The City imposes a 2% tax under RCW 67.28.180 on all charges made for the furnishing of lodging at hotels, motels, and similar establishments (including bed and breakfasts and RV parks) for a continuous period of less than one month. The tax is taken as a credit against the 6.5 percent state sales tax, so that the total tax that a patron pays in retail sales tax and hotel/motel tax combined is equal to the retail sales tax in the jurisdiction. The revenues generated by this tax may be used solely for paying for tourism promotion and for the acquisition and/or operation of tourism-related facilities. Debt Service Fund—LTGO 03: The City issued$9,430,000 in limited tax general obligation bonds(LTGO)in 2003. Of this total: • $7,000,000 of the proceeds were used to finance the construction of CenterPlace at Mirabeau Point. These bonds will be paid off in annual installments over the 30-year period ending December 1, 2033. Annual debt service payments on these bonds are provided by the Spokane Public Facilities District. • $2,430,000 of the proceeds were used to finance Road and Street Improvements near CenterPlace. These bonds will be paid off in annual installments over the 20-year period ending December 1, 2023. Annual debt service payments on these bonds are provided by equal distributions from the 1st and 2nd quarter percent real estate excise tax. Capital Projects Fund Under Washington State Law, RCW 82.46.010, the City is allowed to impose an excise tax on each sale of real property at the rate of one-quarter of one percent of the selling price. The revenue generated is used for financing capital projects as specified in the capital facilities plan under the Growth Management Act. 15 10/18/11 Special Capital Projects Fund Under Washington State Law,RCW 82.46.010,the City is allowed to impose an additional excise tax on each sale of real property at the rate of one-quarter of one percent of the selling price. The revenue generated is used for financing public works capital projects as specified in the capital facilities plan under the Growth Management Act. Stormwater Management Fund: A stormwater fee is imposed upon every developed parcel within the City that is an annual charge of$21 for each single family unit and $21 per 3,160 square feet of impervious surface for all other properties. These charges are uniform for the same class of customers and service facilities. These fees are estimated to generate $1,750,000 in 2012. Aquifer Protection Area Fund: These are voter approved fees to assist the City in protecting the aquifer. The City expects to receive $500,000 in 2012. INTERFUND TRANSFERS Many funds receive a portion of their revenues from other funds in the form of an interfund transfer. These transfers typically represent payments for service or a concentration of revenues for a specific project or purpose. The following funds receive transfers from other funds. Out: 001 1 101 1 105 1 301 1 402 Total In 001 0 39,600 30,000 0 0 15,000 84,600 123 397,000 0 0 0 0 0 397,000 204 0 0 0 92,652 92,651 0 185,303 In: 303 89,000 0 0 363,627 1,448,059 0 1,900,686 309 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 _ 100,000 311 _ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 501 0 100,000 0 0 0 0 100,000 _ 502 319,000 0 0 0 0 0 319,000 3,086,589 Total in Total Out 905,000 139,600 30,000 456,279 1,540,710 15,000' ' 3,086,589 Total out 1 0 #001 General Fund is budgeted to transfer out$905,000: • $397,000 to the #123 Civic Facilities Replacement Fund for future renovations or the future replacement of CenterPlace and the police precinct building. • $89,000 towards#303 Street Capital Projects Fund. • $100,000 towards#309 Park Capital Projects Fund. • $319,000 towards the #502 Risk Management Fund for the 2012 property and liability insurance premium. #101 Street Fund is budgeted to transfer out$139,600: • $39,600 to the #001 General Fund to cover administrative costs. • $100,000 to the #501 Equipment Rental and Replacement Fund for the future replacement of snow plows. 16 1 0/1 8/1 1 #105 Hotel/Motel Tax Fund is budgeted to transfer out $30,000 to the #001 General Fund for the purpose of financing advertising at CenterPlace. #301 Capital Projects Fund is budget to transfer out$456,279: • $92,652 to the #204 Debt Service Fund to pay a portion of the annual payment on the 2003 LTGO bonds. • $363,627 towards grant matches in the#303 Street Capital Projects Fund. #302 Special Capital Projects Fund is budgeted to transfer out$1,540,710: • $92,651 to the #204 Debt Service Fund to pay a portion of the annual payment on the 2003 LTGO bonds. • $1,448,059 towards grant matches in the #303 Street Capital Projects Fund. #402 Stormwater Fund is budgeted to transfer out $15,000 to the #001 General Fund to cover administrative costs. SIGNIFICANT ASSUMPTIONS IN THE 2012 BUDGET Budget Summary for All Funds • The 2012 budget presumes service levels that are consistent with those provided in 2011 with neither significant enhancements nor reductions in any area of operations. • Total appropriations for all City Funds of$57.0 million including$11.3 million in capital expenditures. • Budgets will be adopted across 21 separate funds. • The budget will include a new Aquifer Protection Area Fund. • The full-time equivalent(FTE)employee count will remain unchanged from 2011 at 87.25 employees. • 2012 operating expenditures have been held at or below 1%over 2011. • Positions and salary ranges are based on the City's compensation and classification plan. • Employee benefit amounts are based on employee benefit plans. • Contract costs for public safety,park maintenance,aquatics and street maintenance are based on estimates by City staff. • State required retirements costs(PERS)are included in the budget and additionally the City has set aside $50,000 to offset future State required increases. • The Street Fund budget includes an additional$500,000 for street preservation plus an additional $100,000 to be set aside for future replacements of snow plows. 2012 General Fund Revenues • Total recurring 2012 revenues are estimated at$34,908,800 as compared to $34,827,125 in 2011. • The two largest sources of revenue continue to be Sales Tax and Property Tax which are collectively estimated to account for 77%of 2012 General Fund revenues. • Sales Tax is estimated at$16.2 million which is identical to 2011. • The Property Tax levy will not include the 1%increase authorized by the voters in November 2001 through their approval of Initiative #747 and the subsequent action by the State Legislature in November 2007. o The 2012 levy is estimated at$10,808,900. o The levy assumes we start with the 2011 levy of$10,732,863 and add taxes related to new construction of$76,083. o Based upon a tax levy of$10,808,900 on assessed values of$7,108,291,375 (the most recent figure provided by the Spokane County Assessor's Office)the 2012 levy rate would be $1.5206 per$1,000 of assessed value. • Franchise fees and business registrations are primarily based on projected receipts in 2011. 17 10/18/11 • Liquor excise taxes and Liquor Board profits are based upon per capita distribution figures reported by the Municipal Research and Services Center. Initiative #1183 that will come before the voters of Washington State on November 8,2011 seeks to privatize the distribution and sale of liquor in Washington. It is believed the initiative will have no impact on liquor excise taxes and based upon a fiscal impact statement prepared by the Washington Office of Financial Management it appears 2012 Liquor Board profits will not be impacted either. • Fines and forfeitures are estimated by Spokane Valley and based on historical collections. • Building permit and land use fees are estimated by Spokane Valley and based on historic collections. 2012 General Fund Expenditures • The total recurring 2012 expenditure budget is$34,660,900 as compared to $34,825,086 in 2011. This reflects a decrease of$164,186. If expenditures had increased by 1%they would have grown by $348,251 and this coupled with the actual decrease of$164,186 means the budget is$512,437 less than our goal of no more than a 1%increase. • The 2012 budget presumes service levels that are consistent with those provided in 2011 with neither significant enhancements nor reductions in any area of operations. • 2012 Nonrecurring expenditures are $189,000 as compared to $2.8 million in 2011. o Included in 2012 are: • A$346,600 Contingency/Emergency appropriation that is approximately equal to 1%of recurring expenditures. This money would only be expended with prior approval of the Council. • An $89,000 transfer to Fund#303—Street Capital Projects Fund. • A$100,000 transfer to Fund#309—Parks Capital Projects Fund. o Included in 2011 were: • $1.5 million in transfers for the full paveback program. • $1.084 million in transfers for street preservation. • $146,000 for building permit software. Other Funds • Motor vehicle fuel tax(MVFT)revenue that is collected by the State and remitted to the City is estimated to be $1,905,800 according to per capita estimates provided by the Municipal Research and Services Center. Of this amount, $1,897,800 will be credited to the Street O&M Fund and.42%or$8,000 to the Paths and Trails Fund. • Telephone taxes that are remitted to the City and support Street Fund operations and maintenance are anticipated at$3,000,000. • Real estate excise tax(REET)revenue is computed by the City and is primarily used to match grant funded street projects as well as pay a portion of the annual payment on the 2003 general obligation bonds. In 2012 we estimate these revenues to be $950,000. • Hotel/Motel tax revenues are computed by the City and are dedicated to the promotion of visitors and tourism. In 2012 we estimate these revenues to be $430,000. • The Stomwater Management Fee is based on an equivalent residential unit(ERU)that is equal to 3,160 square feet of impervious surface that is billed at a rate of$21 per single family residence and$21 per ERU for commercial properties(an ERU for a commercial property is computed as total square feet of impervious surface divided by 3,160). 18 10/18/11 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 2012 Budget Summary Estimated Estimated Beginning Ending Fund Total Fund Fund Number and Title Balance Revenues Sources Appropriations Balance 001 General Fund $ 26,633,061 $ 34,908,800 $ 61,541,861 $ 35,196,500 $ 26,345,361 101 Street Fund 1,834,574 4,902,800 6,737,374 5,431,263 1,306,111 103 Paths&Trails Fund 36,186 8,000 44,186 - 44,186 105 Hotel/Motel Fund 253,356 430,700 684,056 430,700 253,356 120 CenterPlace Operating Reserve Fund 353,231 700 353,931 - 353,931 121 Service Level Stabilization Fund 5,477,795 10,000 5,487,795 - 5,487,795 122 Winter Weather Reserve Fund 506,168 700 506,868 - 506,868 123 City Facilities Repair&Replacement 2,027,259 399,000 2,426,259 - 2,426,259 204 Debt Service LTGO 03 - 617,623 617,623 617,623 - 301 Capital Projects Fund 194,277 475,400 669,677 456,279 213,398 302 Special Capital Projects 1,547,015 477,000 2,024,015 1,540,710 483,305 303 Street Capital Projects 73,456 9,655,804 9,729,260 9,566,804 162,456 304 Mirabeau Projects Fund 44,302 - 44,302 - 44,302 307 Capital Grants Fund - - - - - 309 Parks Capital Projects Fund 123,329 100,000 223,329 170,000 53,329 310 Civic Facilities Capital Projects Fund 2,939,745 6,000 2,945,745 - 2,945,745 311 Street Capital Improvement Fund 2011+ 1,084,681 2,200 1,086,881 1,086,881 - 402 Stormwater Management 1,236,400 1,908,667 3,145,067 2,153,441 991,626 403 Aquifer Protection Area 500,000 502,500 1,002,500 - 1,002,500 501 Equipment Rental&Replacement Fund 706,379 100,000 806,379 - 806,379 502 Risk Management Fund 20,420 319,000 339,420 319,000 20,420 Total of all Funds $ 45,591,634 $ 54,824,894 $ 100,416,528 $ 56,969,201 $ 43,447,327 19 10/18/11 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA 10/17/2011 2012 Budget 2011 2012 2010 As As Proposed Actuals Adopted Amendment Amended Budget #001 -GENERAL FUND RECURRING ACTIVITY Revenues Property Tax 10,741,306 10,875,000 0 10,875,000 10,808,900 Sales Tax 16,055,143 16,200,000 0 16,200,000 16,200,000 Gambling Tax 665,276 425,000 175,000 600,000 640,000 Franchise Fees/Business Registration 1,266,776 1,111,000 150,000 1,261,000 1,266,000 Service Revenues 1,472,098 1,600,000 0 1,600,000 1,300,000 State Shared Revenues 2,042,834 1,665,625 30,000 1,695,625 1,834,300 Fines and Forfeitures 1,828,410 1,800,000 0 1,800,000 1,900,000 Recreation Program Fees 630,945 555,500 0 555,500 570,000 Miscellaneous&Investment Interest 255,006 200,000 0 200,000 305,000 Transfer-in -#101 (street admin) 34,300 25,000 0 25,000 39,600 Transfer-in -#105(h/m tax-CP advertising) 39,675 0 0 0 30,000 Transfer-in -#402(storm admin) 13,386 15,000 0 15,000 15,000 Total Recurring Revenues 35,045,155 34,472,125 355,000 34,827,125 34,908,800 Expenditures Legislative Branch 316,543 324,298 0 324,298 386,249 Executive and Legislative Support 1,266,411 1,055,906 0 1,055,906 1,066,465 Public Safety 21,071,640 22,179,880 0 22,179,880 22,000,000 Deputy City Manager 444,784 559,940 0 559,940 658,884 Finance 952,004 1,014,342 0 1,014,342 1,047,107 Human Resources 194,442 236,646 0 236,646 230,231 Public Works 703,956 892,617 0 892,617 901,519 Community Development-Administration 311,601 321,049 0 321,049 323,743 Community Development-Engineering 601,469 669,570 0 669,570 680,796 Community Development-Planning 863,685 1,023,373 0 1,023,373 994,245 Community Development-Building 1,169,936 1,215,303 0 1,215,303 1,260,454 Library 1,012 0 0 0 0 Parks&Rec-Admin. &Maint. 897,258 948,970 0 948,970 1,059,828 Parks&Rec-Recreation 188,623 246,628 0 246,628 229,811 Parks&Rec-Aquatics 420,734 429,250 0 429,250 442,250 Parks&Rec-Senior Center 73,543 89,653 0 89,653 92,961 Parks&Rec-CenterPlace 1,099,702 1,098,911 0 1,098,911 1,126,357 General Government 1,214,659 2,199,750 0 2,199,750 1,841,000 Transfers out-#502 (insurance premium) 318,000 319,000 0 319,000 319,000 Total Recurring Expenditures 32,110,002 34,825,086 0 34,825,086 34,660,900 Recurring Revenues Over(Under) Recurring Expenditures 2,935,153 (352,961) 355,000 2,039 247,900 NONRECURRING ACTIVITY Revenues Transfer-in-#310 ($1.5mm to#303 for full paveback&.5mm to#311 for street capital) 929,048 2,000,000 0 2,000,000 0 Expenditures Contingency/Emergency(1%of recur exp) 0 0 0 0 346,600 Transfers out-#303 (full paveback) 929,048 1,500,000 0 1,500,000 89,000 Transfers out-#309 (park grant match) 100,000 100,000 0 100,000 100,000 Transfers out-#311 (street capital improvement) 0 500,000 0 500,000 0 Transfers out-#311 (40%>$26mm=$584,681) 0 0 584,681 584,681 0 Building permit software purchase 0 0 146,000 146,000 0 Total Nonrecurring Expenditures 1,029,048 2,100,000 730,681 2,830,681 535,600 Nonrecurring Revenues Over(Under) Nonrecurring Expenditures (100,000) (100,000) (730,681) (830,681) (535,600) EXCESS(DEFICIT)OF TOTAL REVENUES OVER(UNDER)TOTAL EXPENDITURES 2,835,153 (452,961) (375,681) (828,642) (287,700) BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 24,626,550 27,461,703 27,461,703 26,633,061 ENDING FUND BALANCE 27,461,703 27,008,742 26,633,061 26,345,361 20 10/18/11 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA 10/17/2011 2012 Budget 2011 2012 2010 As As Proposed Actuals Adopted Amendment Amended Budget SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS #101 -STREET FUND RECURRING ACTIVITY Revenues Motor Vehicle Fuel(Gas)Tax 1,928,003 1,875,000 0 1,875,000 1,897,800 Investment Interest 6,538 12,000 0 12,000 5,000 Insurance Premiums&Recoveries 14,024 0 0 0 0 Utility Tax 2,986,138 3,000,000 0 3,000,000 3,000,000 Miscellaneous Revenue 15,034 0 0 0 0 Total Recurring Revenues 4,949,737 4,887,000 0 4,887,000 4,902,800 Expenditures Wages/Benefits/Payroll Taxes 319,070 433,931 0 433,931 522,142 Supplies 65,712 72,200 0 72,200 72,200 Services&Charges 2,550,065 3,357,296 0 3,357,296 3,310,321 Intergovernmental Payments 739,172 947,000 0 947,000 847,000 Interfund Transfers-out-#001 0 25,000 0 25,000 39,600 Interfund Transfers-out-#103(MVFT) 0 8,300 0 8,300 0 Interfund Transfers-out-#501 (plow replace.) 0 0 0 0 100,000 Interfund Transfers 73,975 44,600 0 44,600 0 Streets Misc. projects 130,206 0 0 0 0 Total Recurring Expenditures 3,878,201 4,888,327 0 4,888,327 4,891,263 Recurring Revenues Over(Under) Recurring Expenditures 1,071,536 (1,327) 0 (1,327) 11,537 NONRECURRING ACTIVITY Revenues Grants 129,194 0 531,800 531,800 0 Interfund Transfers in-#401 0 0 159,800 159,800 0 Miscellaneous 0 0 6,400 6,400 0 Grants 129,194 0 698,000 698,000 0 Expenditures Bridge/Street Maintenance 0 450,000 0 450,000 0 Street Preservation 0 0 0 0 500,000 Interfund Transfers-out-#402(shop facility) 0 0 375,000 375,000 0 Grant financed capital 0 0 868,300 868,300 0 Capital Outlay 35,092 45,000 0 45,000 40,000 Snow Plow purchase(budgeted in 2010 delivered in 2011) 0 200,000 200,000 0 Total Recurring Expenditures 35,092 495,000 1,443,300 1,938,300 540,000 Nonrecurring Revenues Over(Under) Nonrecurring Expenditures 94,102 (495,000) (745,300) (1,240,300) (540,000) EXCESS(DEFICIT)OF TOTAL REVENUES OVER(UNDER)TOTAL EXPENDITURES 1,165,638 (496,327) (745,300) (1,241,627) (528,463) BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 1,910,563 3,076,201 3,076,201 1,834,574 ENDING FUND BALANCE 3,076,201 2,579,874 1,834,574 1,306,111 21 10/18/11 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA 10/17/2011 2012 Budget 2011 2012 2010 As As Proposed Actuals Adopted Amendment Amended Budget SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS-continued #102-Arterial Street Fund Revenues Motor VehicleFuel(Gas)Tax 0 0 0 0 0 Investment Interest 0 0 0 0 0 Interfund Transfer-in 7,917 0 0 0 0 Total revenues 7,917 0 0 0 0 Expenditures Interfund Transfers 0 0 58,019 58,019 0 Total expenditures 0 0 58,019 58,019 0 Revenues over(under)expenditures 7,917 0 (58,019) 0 Beginning fund balance 50,102 58,019 58,019 0 Ending fund balance 58,019 58,019 0 0 #103-PATHS&TRAILS Revenues Motor Vehicle Fuel(Gas)Tax 0 0 0 0 8,000 Interfund Transfer-in#101 (MVFT) 8,132 8,000 0 8,000 0 Investment Interest 78 0 0 0 0 Total revenues 8,210 8,000 0 8,000 8,000 Expenditures IF Transfer for Trails/Paths Cap Prj 0 0 0 0 0 Miscellaneous 690 0 0 0 0 Capital Outlay 0 20,000 0 20,000 0 Total expenditures 690 20,000 0 20,000 0 Revenues over(under)expenditures 7,520 (12,000) (12,000) 8,000 Beginning fund balance 40,666 48,186 48,186 36,186 Ending fund balance 48,186 36,186 36,186 44,186 #105-HOTEL/MOTEL TAX FUND Revenues Hotel/Motel Tax 448,545 480,000 0 480,000 430,000 Investment Interest 1,017 1,000 0 1,000 700 Subtotal revenues 449,562 481,000 0 481,000 430,700 Expenditures Interfund Transfers-#001 37,500 0 0 0 30,000 Tourism Promotion 362,302 500,000 0 500,000 400,700 Subtotal expenditures 399,802 500,000 0 500,000 430,700 Revenues over(under)expenditures 49,760 (19,000) (19,000) 0 Beginning fund balance 222,596 272,356 272,356 253,356 Ending fund balance 272,356 253,356 253,356 253,356 22 10/18/11 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA 10/17/2011 2012 Budget 2011 2012 2010 As As Proposed Actuals Adopted Amendment Amended Budget SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS-continued #120-CENTER PLACE OPERATING RESERVE FUND Revenues Investment Interest 1,047 3,000 0 3,000 700 Interfund Transfer 0 0 0 0 0 Total revenues 1,047 3,000 0 3,000 700 Expenditures Operations 0 0 0 0 0 Total expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 Revenues over(under)expenditures 1,047 3,000 3,000 700 Beginning fund balance 349,184 350,231 350,231 353,231 Ending fund balance 350,231 353,231 353,231 353,931 #121 -SERVICE LEVEL STABILIZATION RESERVE FUND Revenues Investment Interest 16,794 54,000 0 54,000 10,000 Interfund Transfer 0 0 0 0 0 Total revenues 16,794 54,000 0 54,000 10,000 Expenditures Operations 0 0 0 0 0 Total expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 Revenues over(under)expenditures 16,794 54,000 54,000 10,000 Beginning fund balance 5,407,001 5,423,795 5,423,795 5,477,795 Ending fund balance 5,423,795 5,477,795 5,477,795 5,487,795 #122-WINTER WEATHER RESERVE FUND Revenues Investment Interest 1,131 5,000 0 5,000 700 Interfund Transfer 0 0 0 0 0 Subtotal revenues 1,131 5,000 0 5,000 700 Expenditures Reserve for Winter Weather 0 0 0 0 0 Total expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 Revenues over(under)expenditures 1,131 5,000 5,000 700 Beginning fund balance 500,037 501,168 501,168 506,168 Ending fund balance 501,168 506,168 506,168 506,868 #123-CIVIC FACILITIES REPLACEMENT FUND Revenues Investment Interest 3,211 12,000 0 12,000 2,000 Interfund Transfer-#001 397,000 407,000 0 407,000 397,000 Total revenues 400,211 419,000 0 419,000 399,000 Expenditures Capital Outlay 0 0 0 0 0 Total expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 Revenues over(under)expenditures 400,211 419,000 419,000 399,000 Beginning fund balance 1,208,048 1,608,259 1,608,259 2,027,259 Ending fund balance 1,608,259 2,027,259 2,027,259 2,426,259 23 10/18/11 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA 10/17/2011 2012 Budget 2011 2012 2010 As As Proposed Actuals Adopted Amendment Amended Budget DEBT SERVICE FUNDS #204-DEBT SERVICE FUND Revenues Spokane Public Facilities District 421,520 460,000 0 460,000 432,320 Interfund Transfer-in-#301 91,978 110,000 0 110,000 92,652 Interfund Transfer-in-#302 91,979 115,000 0 115,000 92,651 Total revenues 605,477 685,000 0 685,000 617,623 Expenditures Debt Service Payments-CenterPlace 421,522 460,000 0 460,000 432,320 Debt Service Payments-Roads 184,051 225,000 0 225,000 185,303 Total expenditures 605,573 685,000 0 685,000 617,623 Revenues over(under)expenditures (96) 0 0 0 Beginning fund balance 96 (0) (0) (0) Ending fund balance (0) (0) (0) (0) 24 10/18/11 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA 10/17/2011 2012 Budget 2011 2012 2010 As As Proposed Actuals Adopted Amendment Amended Budget CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS #301 -CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND Revenues REET 1 -Taxes 487,110 400,000 0 400,000 475,000 Investment Interest 3,661 15,000 0 15,000 400 Interfund Transfer-in-#303 135,000 0 0 0 0 Total revenues 625,771 415,000 0 415,000 475,400 Expenditures Intergovernmental Services 0 0 0 0 0 Interfund Transfer-out-#204 0 112,500 0 112,500 92,652 Interfund Transfer-out-#303 0 901,098 0 901,098 363,627 Interfund Transfers 991,543 0 0 0 0 Total expenditures 991,543 1,013,598 0 1,013,598 456,279 Revenues over(under)expenditures (365,772) (598,598) (598,598) 19,121 Beginning fund balance 1,158,647 792,875 792,875 194,277 Ending fund balance 792,875 194,277 194,277 213,398 #302 SPECIAL CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND Revenues REET 2-Taxes 475,194 400,000 0 400,000 475,000 Investment Interest 4,584 15,000 0 15,000 2,000 Interfund Transfer-in 7,841 0 0 0 0 Total revenues 487,619 415,000 0 415,000 477,000 Expenditures Interfund Transfer-out-#101 0 0 0 0 0 Interfund Transfer-out-#204 0 112,500 0 112,500 92,651 Interfund Transfer-out-#303 0 897,393 0 897,393 1,448,059 Interfund Transfer-out-#307 0 11,176 30,000 41,176 0 Interfund Transfer-out-#308 0 0 150,000 150,000 0 Interfund Transfers 594,536 0 0 0 0 Total expenditures 594,536 1,021,069 180,000 1,201,069 1,540,710 Revenues over(under)expenditures (106,917) (606,069) (786,069) (1,063,710) Beginning fund balance 2,440,001 2,333,084 2,333,084 1,547,015 Ending fund balance 2,333,084 1,727,015 1,547,015 483,305 25 10/18/11 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA 10/17/2011 2012 Budget 2011 2012 2010 As As Proposed Actuals Adopted Amendment Amended Budget CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS-continued #303 STREET CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND Revenues Grant Proceeds 2,264,783 5,038,819 0 5,038,819 7,755,118 Developer Contribution 70,860 0 0 0 0 Miscellaneous 1,350 0 0 0 0 Interfund Transfer-in-#001 0 1,500,000 0 1,500,000 89,000 Interfund Transfer-in-#301 0 901,095 0 901,095 363,627 Interfund Transfer-in-#302 0 897,393 0 897,393 1,448,059 Interfund Transfer-in-#401 0 100,000 0 100,000 0 Interfund Transfer-in 1,317,918 0 0 0 0 Total revenues 3,654,911 8,437,307 0 8,437,307 9,655,804 Expenditures 005 Pines/Mansfield,Wilbur Rd.to Pines 110,178 450,000 0 450,000 463,312 060 Argonne Rd Corridor Upgrade SRTC 06-31 22,587 581,886 0 581,886 802,792 061 Pines(SR27)ITS Imporvement SRTC 06-26 3,721 1,843,221 0 1,843,221 1,766,201 063 Broadway Avenue Safety Project Pines-Park 74,127 834,000 0 834,000 0 065 Sprague/Sullivan PCC Intersection 957,843 0 0 0 0 066 Broadway Ave. Rehabilitation Proj#2 949 0 0 0 0 069 Park Road-#2(PE Only)-Broadway to Indiana 87,146 0 0 0 0 100 16th&Bettman Stormwater Drainage 0 0 0 0 0 102 Sprague/Evergreen PCCP Intersection 104 0 0 0 0 103 Sprague/Pines PCCP Intersection 7,182 0 0 0 0 104 Sprague/McDonald PCCP Intersection 1,312 0 0 0 0 110 Sprague Resurface-E'green to University 55,313 0 0 0 0 112 Indiana Ave. Extension-3600 189,479 200,000 0 200,000 0 113 Indiana/Sullivan Intersection PCC 54,060 1,171,200 0 1,171,200 0 114 Broadway/Sullivan PCC Intersection 723,739 0 0 0 0 115 Sprague Ave Resurfacing-Evergreen to Sullivan 2,946 0 0 0 1,582,000 127 2009 ADA Improvements 96,449 0 0 0 0 139 Park Rd RR Crosing Safety Improvements 8,938 0 0 0 0 STEP Projects(106,107,109,128,129,130,131) 1,213,840 0 0 0 0 WSDOT Urban Ramp Projects 45,000 0 0 0 0 Contingency 0 500,000 0 500,000 1,500,000 Misc. Road Projects 0 1,935,000 0 1,935,000 0 123 Mission Ave-Flora to Barker 0 488,000 0 488,000 300,000 141 Sullivan&Euclid PCC 0 163,000 0 163,000 26,289 142 Broadway @ Argonne/Mullan 0 271,000 0 271,000 138,150 145 Spokane Valley-Millwood Trail 0 0 0 0 447,000 146 24th Ave Sidewalk-Adams to Sullivan 0 0 0 0 278,520 148 Greenacres Trail-Design 0 0 0 0 60,000 149 In-House Design-Sidewalk Infill 0 0 0 0 398,250 154 Sidewalk&Tansit Stop Accessibility 0 0 0 0 182,290 155 Sullivan Rd W Bridge Replacement 0 0 0 0 600,000 Mansfield Ave. Connection 0 0 0 0 738,000 University Rd/1-90 Overpass Study 0 0 0 0 284,000 Total expenditures 3,654,911 8,437,307 0 8,437,307 9,566,804 Revenues over(under)expenditures 0 0 0 89,000 Beginning fund balance 73,456 73,456 73,456 73,456 Ending fund balance 73,456 73,456 73,456 162,456 26 10/18/11 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA 10/17/2011 2012 Budget 2011 2012 2010 As As Proposed Actuals Adopted Amendment Amended Budget CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS-continued #304-MIRABEAU PROJECTS FUND Revenues Other Miscellaneous Revenue 0 0 0 0 0 Investment Interest 0 0 0 0 0 Total revenues 0 0 0 0 0 Expenditures Capital Outlays 0 0 0 0 0 Transfers 0 0 0 0 0 Total expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 Revenues over(under)expenditures 0 0 0 0 Beginning fund balance 44,302 44,302 44,302 44,302 Ending fund balance 44,302 44,302 44,302 44,302 #307-CAPITAL GRANTS FUND Revenues Grant Proceeds 1,685,541 0 120,000 120,000 0 Miscellaneous 1,000 55,000 0 55,000 0 Interfund Transfer-in-#302 0 0 30,000 30,000 0 Interfund Transfer-in 311,226 0 0 0 0 Total revenues 1,997,767 55,000 150,000 205,000 0 Expenditures 019 Broadway Ave. Rehab-Bates to Sullivan 4,986 0 0 0 0 039 Argonne Road Overlay-Indiana to Montgomery 2,931 0 0 0 0 054 44th Ave Pathway:Woodruff Rd.to Sands Rd. 360,234 5,000 0 5,000 0 062 Appleway/Sprague/Dishman ITS I90-Dishman-0i 2,880 50,000 0 50,000 0 088 Broadway-Moore to Flora 1,626,735 0 150,000 150,000 0 Miscellaneous 0 0 129 129 0 Total expenditures 1,997,767 55,000 150,129 205,129 0 Revenues over(under)expenditures 0 0 (129) 0 Beginning fund balance 129 129 129 0 Ending fund balance 129 129 0 0 27 10/18/11 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA 10/17/2011 2012 Budget 2011 2012 2010 As As Proposed Actuals Adopted Amendment Amended Budget CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS-continued #308-BARKER BRIDGE FUND Revenues Grant Proceeds 494,897 0 0 0 0 Developer Contribution 83,676 0 0 0 0 Interfund Transfer-in-#302 669,779 0 150,000 150,000 0 Total revenues 1,248,352 0 150,000 150,000 0 Expenditures Bridge Reconstruction 1,248,352 0 150,000 150,000 0 Total expenditures 1,248,352 0 150,000 150,000 0 Revenues over(under)expenditures 0 0 0 0 Beginning fund balance 0 0 0 0 Ending fund balance 0 0 0 0 #309-PARKS CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND Revenues Grant Proceeds 0 500,000 0 500,000 0 Interfund Transfer-in-#001 0 100,000 0 100,000 100,000 Interfund Transfers 209,031 0 0 0 0 Investment Interest 2,612 13,000 0 13,000 0 Total revenues 211,643 613,000 0 613,000 100,000 Expenditures Terrace View Park Shelter 23,489 80,000 0 80,000 0 Terrace View Park Play Equipment 0 0 0 0 120,000 Contingency 0 320,000 (220,000) 100,000 50,000 Greenacres Park 55,106 1,559,036 0 1,559,036 0 Valley Mission Park 39,132 0 0 0 0 Discovery(Universal)Park 191,305 0 0 0 0 Total expenditures 309,031 1,959,036 (220,000) 1,739,036 170,000 Revenues over(under)expenditures (97,388) (1,346,036) (1,126,036) (70,000) Beginning fund balance 1,346,752 1,249,365 1,249,365 123,329 Ending fund balance 1,249,365 (96,671) 123,329 53,329 28 10/18/11 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA 10/17/2011 2012 Budget 2011 2012 2010 As As Proposed Actuals Adopted Amendment Amended Budget CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS-continued #310-CIVIC FACILITIES CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND Revenues Interfund Transfers 0 0 0 0 0 Investment Interest 18,060 40,000 0 40,000 6,000 Total revenues 18,060 40,000 0 40,000 6,000 Expenditures Interfund Transfers 929,048 0 0 0 0 Interfund Transfers-out-#001 0 2,000,000 0 2,000,000 0 Facilities 17,866 0 0 0 0 Total expenditures 946,914 2,000,000 0 2,000,000 0 Revenues over(under)expenditures (928,855) (1,960,000) (1,960,000) 6,000 Beginning fund balance 5,828,600 4,899,745 4,899,745 2,939,745 Ending fund balance 4,899,745 2,939,745 2,939,745 2,945,745 #311 -STREET CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 2011+ Revenues Interfund Transfers-in-#001 0 500,000 0 500,000 0 Interfund Transfers in-#001 (40%>$26mm=$584,681) 0 584,681 584,681 0 Investment Interest 0 0 0 0 2,200 Total revenues 0 500,000 584,681 1,084,681 2,200 Expenditures Facilities 0 500,000 (500,000) 0 1,086,881 Total expenditures 0 500,000 (500,000) 0 1,086,881 Revenues over(under)expenditures 0 0 1,084,681 (1,084,681) Beginning fund balance 0 0 0 1,084,681 Ending fund balance 0 0 1,084,681 0 29 10/18/11 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA 10/17/2011 2012 Budget 2011 2012 2010 As As Proposed Actuals Adopted Amendment Amended Budget ENTERPRISE FUNDS #402-STORMWATER FUND RECURRING ACTIVITY Revenues Stormwater Management Fees 1,742,244 1,710,000 0 1,710,000 1,750,000 Investment Interest 7,360 0 0 0 5,000 Miscellaneous 6,324 22,000 0 22,000 0 Total Recurring Revenues 1,755,928 1,732,000 0 1,732,000 1,755,000 Expenditures Wages/Benefits/Payroll Taxes 337,055 418,000 0 418,000 438,614 Supplies 12,287 43,100 0 43,100 32,540 Services&Charges 885,283 1,221,905 0 1,221,905 1,244,287 Intergovernmental Payments 22,135 46,640 0 46,640 23,000 Depreciation 50,582 0 0 0 0 Interfund Transfers-out-#001 0 0 0 0 15,000 Total Recurring Expenditures 1,307,343 1,729,645 0 1,729,645 1,753,441 Recurring Revenues Over(Under) Recurring Expenditures 448,586 2,355 0 2,355 1,559 NONRECURRING ACTIVITY Revenues Grant Proceeds 19,754 0 0 0 153,667 Interfund Transfers-in-#101 (shop facility) 0 0 375,000 375,000 0 Total Nonrecurring Revenues 19,754 0 375,000 375,000 153,667 Expenditures Interfund Transfers-out 90,170 100,000 0 100,000 0 Contracted maintenance 0 120,000 0 120,000 0 Div. 055 NPDES-Phase II program dev. 21,670 0 0 0 0 Capital-various projects 334,887 300,000 0 300,000 400,000 Shop Facility 0 0 750,000 750,000 0 Interfund Transfers out-#101 0 0 159,800 159,800 0 Total Nonrecurring Expenditures 446,727 520,000 909,800 1,429,800 400,000 Nonrecurring Revenues Over(Under) Nonrecurring Expenditures (426,973) (520,000) (534,800) (1,054,800) (246,333) EXCESS(DEFICIT)OF TOTAL REVENUES OVER(UNDER)TOTAL EXPENDITURES 21,612 (517,645) (534,800) (1,052,445) (244,774) BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 2,267,232 2,288,845 2,288,845 1,236,400 ENDING FUND BALANCE 2,288,845 1,771,200 1,236,400 991,626 30 10/18/11 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA 10/17/2011 2012 Budget 2011 2012 2010 As As Proposed Actuals Adopted Amendment Amended Budget ENTERPRISE FUNDS-continued #403-AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA Revenues Spokane County 0 0 500,000 500,000 500,000 Investment Interest 0 0 0 0 2,500 Total revenues 0 0 500,000 500,000 502,500 Expenditures Facilities 0 0 0 0 0 Total expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 Revenues over(under)expenditures 0 0 500,000 502,500 Beginning fund balance 0 0 0 500,000 Ending fund balance 0 0 500,000 1,002,500 31 10/18/11 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA 10/17/2011 2012 Budget 2011 2012 2010 As As Proposed Actuals Adopted Amendment Amended Budget INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS #501 -ER&R FUND Revenues Interfund Transfer-in-#001 0 0 0 0 0 Interfund Transfer-in-#101 (plow replace.) 0 0 0 0 100,000 Investment Interest 301 9,000 0 9,000 0 Total revenues 301 9,000 0 9,000 100,000 Expenditures Computer replacement lease 0 0 0 0 0 Software/Hardware replacement 0 0 0 0 0 Vehicle Replacement 0 0 0 0 0 Capital Outlay 0 209,000 0 209,000 0 Total expenditures 0 209,000 0 209,000 0 Revenues over(under)expenditures 301 (200,000) (200,000) 100,000 Beginning fund balance 906,078 906,379 906,379 706,379 Ending fund balance 906,379 706,379 706,379 806,379 #502-RISK MANAGEMENT FUND Revenues Investment Interest 50 0 0 0 0 Interfund Transfer-#001 318,000 319,000 0 319,000 319,000 Total revenues 318,050 319,000 0 319,000 319,000 Expenditures Services&Charges 309,724 319,000 0 319,000 319,000 Total expenditures 309,724 319,000 0 319,000 319,000 Revenues over(under)expenditures 8,326 0 0 0 Beginning fund balance 12,094 20,420 20,420 20,420 Ending fund balance 20,420 20,420 20,420 20,420 32 10/18/11 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA 10/17/2011 2012 Budget 2011 2012 2010 As As Proposed Actuals Adopted Amendment Amended Budget Total of Revenues for all Funds 52,881,639 55,549,432 2,812,681 58,362,113 54,824,894 Total of Expenditures for all Funds 49,865,255 61,277,068 2,901,929 64,178,997 56,969,201 Total Capital expenditures(included in total expenditures) 11,525,343 1,544,429 13,069,772 11,263,685 33 10/18/11 City of Spokane Valley 2012 Budget Revenues by Type General Fund Property Tax 10,808,900 Sales Tax 16,200,000 Gambling Tax 640,000 Franchise Fees/Business Registration 1,266,000 State Shared Revenues 1,834,300 Service Revenues 1,300,000 Fines and Forfeitures 1,900,000 Recreation Program Fees 570,000 Miscellaneous, Investment Int. ,Transfers 389,600 Total General Fund 34,908,800 Other Funds 101 Street Fund 4,902,800 103 Paths & Trails Fund 8,000 105 Hotel/Motel Fund 430,700 120 CenterPlace Operating Reserve Fund 700 121 Service Level Reserve Fund 10,000 122 Winter Weather Reserve Fund 700 123 City Facilities Repair& Replacement 399,000 204 Debt Service LTGO 03 617,623 301 Capital Projects Fund 475,400 302 Special Capital Projects Fund 477,000 303 Street Capitial Projects Fund 9,655,804 304 Mirabeau Point Project Fund - 306 CDBG Fund Revenues - 307 Capital Grants Fund - 308 Barker Bridge - Federal Grant Fund - 309 Parks Capital Fund 100,000 310 Civic Facilities Capital Fund 6,000 311 Street Capital Improvement Fund 2011+ 2,200 402 Stormwater Management Fund 1,908,667 403 Aquifer Protection Area 502,500 501 Equipment Rental & Replacement Fund 100,000 502 Risk Management Fund 319,000 Total Other Funds 19,916,094 Total All Funds $ 54,824,894 34 10/18/11 Sales Tax 46% City of Spokane Valley 2012 General Fund Revenues $34,908,800 State Shared Revenues 5% Service Revenues 4% Fines& Forfeitures 5% Miscellaneous l 8% Property Tax 30% Debt Service LTGO 03 2% 35 10/18/11 Other Misc. Funds 2% Street Fund 9% City of Spokane Valley 2012 City Wide Revenues $ 54,824,894 Debt Service Fund 1% Capital Projects Fund 20% Stormwater Management Fund 3% General Fund 64% Internal Service Funds 1% 36 10/18/11 City of Spokane Valley 2012 Budget Detail Revenues by Type 2012 2010 2011 Proposed General Fund Revenues Actual Budget Budget Beginning Fund Balance $ - $ - $ - Property Tax Property Tax $ 10,555,192 $ 10,700,000 $ 10,658,900 Property Tax-Delinquent 186,114 175,000 150,000 10,741,306 10,875,000 10,808,900 Sales Taxes Sales Tax 14,097,300 14,210,000 14,210,000 Sales Tax-Criminal Justice 1,241,917 1,200,000 1,200,000 Sales Tax-Public Safety 715,926 790,000 790,000 16,055,143 16,200,000 16,200,000 Gambling Taxes Amusement Games 10,888 2,000 10,000 Card Games 563,477 518,000 550,000 Interest on Gambling Tax 19,133 10,000 10,000 Punch Boards&Pull Tabs 71,778 70,000 70,000 665,276 600,000 640,000 Licenses&Permits Business Licenses 89,477 90,000 90,000 Franchise Fees 1,177,299 1,171,000 1,176,000 1,266,776 1,261,000 1,266,000 State Shared Revenues City Assistance State Revenue 61,713 10,000 10,000 Criminal Justice Area#4 131,088 130,000 130,000 Criminal Justice Special Programs 75,804 74,000 76,600 DUI-Cities 16,503 29,000 17,000 False Alarm Srvs - - - Liquor Board Excise Tax 443,362 410,000 451,400 Liquor Board Profits 715,439 641,859 557,800 MVET Criminal Justice-Population 20,043 19,000 22,500 Payment in Lieu of Taxes-DNR 3,805 3,500 3,500 Streamline Mitigation of Sales Tax 569,899 372,000 560,000 Work Study Reimbursement 5,179 6,266 5,500 2,042,835 1,695,625 1,834,300 Service Revenues Airway Heights Bldg.Plan Rev. 21,489 - - Building Permits 738,696 722,800 722,800 Code Enforcement 17,034 - - Cry Wolf Fees 001.000.000.342.28.02 154,643 100,000 145,000 Demolition Permits 3,204 5,200 5,200 Grading Permits 1,221 5,000 5,000 Mechanical Permits 83,475 92,000 92,000 Misc.Permits&Fees 5,891 100,000 5,000 Planning Fees 313,019 290,000 290,000 Plans Check Fees - 250,000 - Plumbing Permits 47,039 35,000 35,000 Right of Way Permits 86,387 - - 1,472,098 1,600,000 1,300,000 Fines and Forfeitures Fines&Forfeits-Traffic 851,996 820,000 900,000 Other Criminal-Non Traffic Fines 976,414 980,000 1,000,000 1,828,410 1,800,000 1,900,000 Recreation Program Charges Activity Fees(To use a recreational facility) 264,701 205,000 200,000 Program Fees(To participate in a program) 366,244 350,500 370,000 630,945 555,500 570,000 Miscellaneous Investment Interest 130,195 100,000 145,000 Sales Tax Interest 20,147 50,000 50,000 Property Tax Interest - - - Police Precinct Rent 53,708 50,000 55,000 Office of Public Def-Re-Licensing Grant - - - Miscellaneous Revenue&Grants 50,955 - 55,000 255,006 200,000 305,000 Transfers Transfer-in-#101(street admin) 34,300 25,000 39,600 Transfer-in-#105(h/m tax-CP advertising) 39,675 - 30,000 Transfer-in-#310(full paveback) 929,048 2,000,000 - Transfer-in-#402(storm admin) 13,386 15,000 15,000 1,016,409 2,040,000 84,600 Total General Fund Revenue $ 35,974,204 $ 36,827,125 $ 34,908,800 Total General Fund Revenue and Beginning Fund Balance $ 35,974,204 $ 36,827,125 $ 34,908,800 37 10/18/11 City of Spokane Valley 2012 Budget Detail Revenues by Type 2012 2010 2011 Proposed Other Fund Revenues Actuals Budget Budget 101 Street Fund Unreserved Fund Balance - - - FEMA-18025-DR-WA Grant Funds 436 - - Insurance Premiums&Recoveries 14,024 - - Investment Interest 6,538 12,000 5,000 Motor Fuel(Gas)Tax 1,928,004 1,875,000 1,897,800 Other Miscellaneous Revenues&Grants 138,221 - - Street Maintenance&Repair Charges 5,571 - - Utilitiestax 2,986,138 3,000,000 3,000,000 5,078,932 4,887,000 4,902,800 102 Arterial Street Fund Unreserved Fund Balance - - - Transfer from: Capital Grants Fund 7,917 - - 7,917 - - 103 Paths&Trails Fund Unreserved Fund Balance - - - Interfund Transfer-in-#101 (MVFT) - 8,000 - Investment Interest 78 - - Motor Fuel(Gas)Tax 8,132 - 8,000 8,210 8,000 8,000 105 Hotel/Motel Fund Unreserved Fund Balance - - - Hotel/Motel Tax 448,545 480,000 430,000 Investment Interest 1,017 1,000 700 449,562 481,000 430,700 120 CenterPlace Operating Reserve Unreserved Fund Balance - - - Investment Interest 1,047 3,000 700 1,047 3,000 700 121 Service Level Stabilization Reserve Unreserved Fund Balance - - - Investment Interest 16,795 54,000 10,000 16,795 54,000 10,000 122 Winter Weather Reserve Unreserved Fund Balance - - - Interfund Transfer - - - Investment Interest 1,131 5,000 700 1,131 5,000 700 123 City Facilities Repair&Replacement Unreserved Fund Balance - - - Investment Interest 3,211 12,000 2,000 Interfund Transfer#001 397,000 407,000 397,000 400,211 419,000 399,000 38 10/18/11 City of Spokane Valley 2012 Budget Detail Revenues by Type 2012 2010 2011 Proposed Other Fund Revenues Actuals Budget Budget Other Fund Revenues 204 Debt Service-LTGO 03 Unreserved Fund Balance - - - Facilities District Revenue 421,520 460,000 432,320 Interfund Transfer-in-#301 91,978 110,000 92,652 Interfund Transfer-in-#302 91,978 115,000 92,651 605,477 685,000 617,623 301 Capital Protects Fund Unreserved Fund Balance - - - Investment Interest 3,661 15,000 400 REET 1 - 1st.25 Percent 487,110 400,000 475,000 Transfer from: Street Capital Projects 135,000 - - 625,771 415,000 475,400 302 Special Capital Protects Fund Unreserved Fund Balance - - - Investment Interest 4,584 15,000 2,000 REET 2-2nd .25 Percent 475,194 400,000 475,000 Transfer from: Street Capital Projects 7,841 - - 487,619 415,000 477,000 303 Street Capital Protects Unreserved Fund Balance - - - Developer Contributions 70,860 - - Grant Proceeds 2,266,605 4,738,819 7,755,118 Interfund Transfer-in-#001 929,048 1,500,000 89,000 Interfund Transfer-in-#301 63,837 901,098 363,627 Interfund Transfer-in-#302 275,929 897,390 1,448,059 Interfund Transfer-in-#401 48,630 100,000 - Transfer from Block Grant - 300,000 - Transfer from General Fund - - - 3,654,911 8,437,307 9,655,804 307 Capital Grants Fund Unreserved Fund Balance - - - Capital Grant Proceeds 1,686,541 120,000 - Interfund Transfer-in-#302 - 30,000 - Miscellaneous/Private Development - 55,000 - Transfer from Capital Project(301) 56,918 - - Transfer from Stormwater 28,154 - - Transfers from Special Capital Projects Fund 226,154 - - 1,997,767 205,000 - 39 10/18/11 City of Spokane Valley 2012 Budget Detail Revenues by Type 2012 2010 2011 Proposed Other Fund Revenues Actuals Budget Budget 308 Barker Bridge Reconstruction-Fed Grant Coordination Revenue 83,676 - - Federal Grant Proceeds 494,897 - - Interfund Transfer-in-#302 - 150,000 - Transfer from Capital Project(301) 669,779 - - 1,248,352 150,000 - 309 Parks Capital Protects Unreserved Fund Balance - - - Investment Interest 2,612 13,000 - State Rec&Conservation Grant Rev - 500,000 - Transfer from Cap. Proj. (301) 109,031 - - Transfer from the General Fund 100,000 100,000 100,000 211,643 613,000 100,000 310 Civic Facilities Capital Protects Unreserved Fund Balance - - - Investment Interest 18,060 40,000 6,000 18,060 40,000 6,000 311 Street Capital Improvement 2011+ Unreserved Fund Balance - - - Investment Interest - - 2,200 Interfund Transfers-in-#001 (40%>$26mm=$584,6 - 584,681 - Interfund Transfers-in-#001 - 500,000 - - 1,084,681 2,200 402 Stormwater Management Fund Unreserved Fund Balance - - - Grant Proceeds 19,754 - 153,667 Interfund Transfers-in-#101 (shop facility) - 375,000 - Investment Interest 7,360 22,000 5,000 Miscellaneous 6,324 - - Stormwater Management Fee 1,742,244 1,710,000 1,750,000 1,775,682 2,107,000 1,908,667 403 Aquifer Protection Area Investment Interest - - 2,500 Spokane County - 500,000 500,000 - 500,000 502,500 501 Equipment Rental &Replacement Fund Unreserved Fund Balance - - - Investment Interest 301 9,000 - Interfund Transfer-in-#101 (plow replace) - - 100,000 301 9,000 100,000 502 Risk Management Fund Unreserved Fund Balance - - - Employment Security Transfers - - - Interfund Transfer-#001 318,000 319,000 319,000 Investment Interest 50 - - 318,050 319,000 319,000 Total all other Funds Revenue 16,907,437 20,836,988 19,916,094 General Fund Revenues 35,974,204 36,827,125 34,908,800 Total Revenues 52,881,639 57,664,113 54,824,894 40 10/18/11 City of Spokane Valley 2012 Budget Expenditures by Department General Fund Council $ 386,249 City Manager 1,066,465 Public Safety 22,000,000 Operations &Administrative Deputy City Manager 658,884 Finance 1,047,107 Human Resources 230,231 Public Works 901,519 Planning & Community Development Admin 323,743 Planning 994,245 Building 1,260,454 Development Engineering 680,796 Library - Parks & Recreation Administration & Maintenance 1,059,828 Recreation 229,811 Aquatics 442,250 Senior Center 92,960 CenterPlace 1,126,357 General Government 2,695,600 Total General Fund 35,196,500 Other Funds 101 Street Fund 5,431,263 103 Paths & Trails Fund - 105 Hotel/Motel Fund 430,700 204 Debt Service - LTGO 03 617,623 301 Capital Projects Fund 456,279 302 Special Capital Projects Fund 1,540,710 303 Street Capital Projects Fund 9,566,804 309 Parks Capital Projects Fund 170,000 311 Street Capital Improvement 2011+ 1,086,881 402 Stormwater Management Fund 2,153,441 403 Aquifer Protection Area - 501 Equipment Rental & Replacement - 502 Risk Management Fund 319,000 Total All Funds $ 56,969,201 41 10/18/11 City of Spokane Valley 2012 General Fund Expenditures $ 35,196,500 Public Safety 63% 1141116* General Government 8% Parks& Recreations 8% Planning&Community Development 9% Legislative& Executive 4% Operation&Administrative 5% Public Works 3% 42 10/18/11 Gen.Gov., Risk Mgmt, Equip 5% Capital Projects 24% -\ Reserves,Tourism 1% City of Spokane Valley 2012 City Wide Expenditures $ 56,969,201 Street Fund' 9% Parks& Recreation 5% Stormwater Management Fund 4% Public Safety 39% 1111110perations&Administrative 7% Planning&Community Development 6% 43 10/18/11 City of Spokane Valley 2012 Budget General Fund Expenditures by Department by Type Wages& Capital Benefits Supplies Services Intergovernmental Interfund Expenditures Total General Fund Legislative Branch $ 174,867 $ 6,250 $ 205,132 $ - $ $ - $ 386,249 Legislative&Executive 906,951 7,720 151,794 - - 1,066,465 Public Safety - - 21,920,000 80,000 - 22,000,000 Operations&Administrative Deputy City Manager 600,149 2,850 55,885 - - 658,884 Finance 1,011,932 3,500 31,675 - - 1,047,107 Human Resources 189,459 1,847 38,925 - - 230,231 Public Works 754,769 36,000 103,750 - 7,000 901,519 Planning&Community Development Admin 292,643 4,100 12,000 15,000 - 323,743 Planning 822,895 10,250 86,100 75,000 - 994,245 Building 1,066,404 35,300 85,350 65,000 8,400 - 1,260,454 Development Engineering 578,346 7,800 49,650 45,000 - 680,796 Library - - - - - Parks&Recreation Parks Administration 202,978 61,600 781,050 11,000 3,200 - 1,059,828 Recreation 149,911 9,250 64,650 - 6,000 - 229,811 Aquatics - 3,000 439,250 - - 442,250 Senior Center 77,320 5,240 10,400 - - 92,960 CenterPlace 381,403 78,876 342,078 - 324,000 - 1,126,357 General Government - 33,500 564,000 1,022,500 1,075,600 - 2,695,600 Total General Fund $ 7,210,028 $ 307,083 $ 3,021,689 $ 23,153,500 $ 1,497,200 $ 7,000 $ 35,196,500 44 10/18/11 Fund:001 General Fund Spokane Valley Dept: 011 Legislative Branch 2012 Budget 011 -Council This department accounts for the cost of providing effective elected representation of the citizenry in the governing body. The Council makes policy decisions for the City and is accountable to Spokane Valley citizens by making decisions regarding how resources are allocated,the appropriate levels of service, and establishing goals and policies for the organization. Accomplishments for 2011 • Continue monitoring significant wastewater issues,including governance of wastewater facilities, enhanced citizen awareness of options for the future and pursuit of the most efficient and economical use of allowed wastewater discharges. This goal will be complete if Spokane County is issued their Wastewater permit by the end of the year. • Reevaluate regulations specified in the Sprague/Appleway Revitalization Plan as adopted and amended by the City Council. The Sprague and Appleway Corridors Subarea Plan was removed from the Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan. • Develop a Shoreline Master Program to provide appropriate regulatory protection for waters of statewide significance as required by state statute. Shoreline Master Program,Shoreline Inventory and the Goals and Policies have been drafted and processed through the public hearing process. • Pursue a legislative capital budget request for state funding for the acquisition of parkland adjacent to Road Street Pool No state funds were available for this project;however, HB1922 was passed requiring certain vehicles to stop at a port of entry upon entering the state and Spokane Valley Partners received$100,000 in capital funds to improve its facility. • Develop and implement a multi-year winter roads maintenance plan including availability,costs and effects of private sector vendors performing winter road maintenance for the City The winter plan has been implemented. Equipment and maintenance facility have been purchased. We will continue to monitor and make recommended changes. • Explore a range of options for a City Hall Discussed option of constructing a city hall at or near CenterPlace. 45 10/18/11 Fund:001 General Fund Spokane Valley Dept: 011 Legislative Branch 2012 Budget 011 -Council Goals for 2012 • Continue monitoring wastewater issues,including governance of wastewater facilities, and pursuit of the most efficient and economical methods to ensure the continuation of wastewater discharge licenses. •Solid Waste to include identifying the issue and research alternatives of joining the consortium or handling it ourselves and examining the consequences of each alternative. • Review and Evaluate development regulations and compare with surrounding cities. • Develop a Shoreline Master Program to provide appropriate regulatory protection for waters of statewide significance as required by state statute. • Pursue a legislative capital budget request-to be identified • Create an Economic Development Plan including options for a city hall. Budget Summary 2012 2010 2011 Proposed Actual Budget Budget Personnel-FTE Equivalents Mayor 1.0 1.0 1.0 Council 6.0 6.0 6.0 Total FTEs 7.0 7.0 7.0 Budget Detail Salaries,Wages,&Benefits $ 138,277 $ 143,718 $ 174,867 Supplies 7,308 7,000 6,250 Services&Charges 170,958 173,580 205,132 Total Legislative Branch $ 316,543 $ 324,298 $ 386,249 46 10/18/11 Fund:001 General Fund Spokane Valley Dept: 013 Executive&Legislative Support 2012 Budget 013-City Manager This department is accountable to the City Council for the operational results of the organization, effective support of elected officials in achieving their goals;fulfillment of the statutory requirements of the City Manager,implementation of City Council policies,and provision of a communication linkage between citizens,the City Council,City departments,and other government agencies. Accomplishments for 2011 •Continue monitoring significant wastewater issues,including governance of wastewater facilities, enhanced citizen awareness of options for the future and pursuit of the most efficient and economical use of allowed wastewater discharges licenses. This goal will be complete if Spokane County is issued their Wastewater permit by the end of the year. • Reevaluate regulations specified in the Sprague/Appleway Revitalization Plan as adopted and amended by the City Council. Advised the Council and staff on re-evaluating the regulations specified in the Sprague/ Appleway Revitalization Plan,including the means to legally repeal the entire subarea plan. The Sprague and Appleway Corridors Subarea Plan was removed from the Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan. •Develop a Shoreline Master Program to provide appropriate regulatory protection for waters of statewide significance as required by state statute. Advised the Council and staff on identifying appropriate regulatory framework for regulations under the Washington State Shoreline Management Act,including scope of permissible City discretion. Shoreline Master Program,Shoreline Inventory and the Goals and Policies have been drafted and processed through the public hearing process. •Pursue a legislative capital budget request for state funding for the acquisition of parkland adjacent to Park Road Pool No state funds were available for this project;however, HB1922 was passed requiring certain vehicles to stop at a port of entry upon entering the state and Spokane Valley Partners received$100,000 in capital funds to improve its facility. •Develop and implement a multi-year winter roads maintenance plan including availability,costs and effects of private sector vendors performing winter road maintenance for the City The winter plan has been implemented. Equipment and maintenance facility have been purchased. We will continue to monitor and make recommended changes. • Explore a range of options for a City Hall Discussed option of constructing a city hall at or near CenterPlace. 47 10/18/11 Fund:001 General Fund Spokane Valley Dept: 013 Executive&Legislative Support 2012 Budget 013-City Manager Goals for 2012 •Continue monitoring wastewater issues,including governance of wastewater facilities, and pursuit of the most efficient and economical methods to ensure the continuation of wastewater discharge licenses. •Solid Waste to include identifying the issue and research alternatives of joining the consortium or handling it ourselves and examining the consequences of each alternative. • Review and Evaluate development regulations and compare with surrounding cities. •Develop a Shoreline Master Program to provide appropriate regulatory protection for waters of statewide significance as required by state statute. •Pursue a legislative capital budget request-to be identified •Create an Economic Development Plan including options for a city hall. Budget Summary 2012 2010 2011 Proposed Actual Budget Budget Personnel-FTE Equivalents City Manager 1.0 1.0 1.0 City Attorney 1.0 1.0 1.0 City Clerk 1.0 1.0 1.0 Deputy City Attorney 1.0 1.0 1.0 Deputy City Clerk 1.0 1.0 1.0 Administrative Assistant-Legal 1.0 1.0 1.0 Administrative Assistant(CC) 1.0 1.0 1.0 Administrative Assistant(CM) 1.0 1.0 1.0 Total FTEs 8.0 8.0 8.0 Interns 3.5 2.0 3.0 Budget Detail(*) Salaries,Wages,&Benefits $ 1,126,988 $ 900,371 $ 906,951 Supplies 4,350 17,400 7,720 Services&Charges 135,072 138,135 151,794 Total Executive&Legislative Support $ 1,266,411 $ 1,055,906 $ 1,066,465 48 10/18/11 Fund: 001 General Fund City of Spokane Valley Dept: 016 Public Safety 2012 Budget 016 - Public Safety The Public Safety department budget provides funds for the protection of persons and property in the city. The City contracts with Spokane County for law enforcement, district court, prosecutor services, public defender services, probation services,jail and animal control services. See following page for detail information on each budgeted section. Judicial System -The Spokane County District Court is contracted to provide municipal court services. The contract provides for the services of judge and court commissioner with related support staff. Budgeted amount also includes jury management fees. Budgeted contract amount: $ 2,212,698 Law Enforcement - The Spokane County Sheriff's Office is responsible for maintaining law and order and providing police services to the community under the direction of the Police Chief. The office provides for the preservation of life, protection of property, and reduction of crime. Budgeted contract amount: $ 16,730,138 Jail System - Spokane County provides jail and probation services for persons sentenced by any City of Spokane Valley Municipal Court Judge for violating laws of the city or state. Budgeted contract amount: $ 1,333,131 Animal Control - Spokane County will provide animal control services to include licensing, care and treatment of lost or stray animals, and response to potentially dangerous animal confrontations. Budgeted contract amount: $ 315,516 Fines & Forfeitures State Remittance Budgeted contract amount: $ 1,057,363 Communications Budgeted contract amount: $ 271,154 Interfund Transfers -Transfer to Fund #123 to cover future building improvements or the eventual replacement of the precinct building $ 80,000 Total $ 22,000,000 49 10/18/11 City of Spokane Valley 2012 Budget 016 - Public Safety 2012 2010 2011 Proposed Actual Budget Budget Judicial System: District Court Contract 814,284 819,345 1,071,588 Jury Management Contract - - - Intergovernmental Payments 30,855 - - Public Defender Contract 485,456 510,476 582,643 Prosecutor Contract 396,151 400,342 430,074 Pretrial Services Contract 83,137 96,111 128,393 Prosecutor-Funded by JAG Grant 12,403 - - Subtotal Judicial System 1,822,285 1,826,274 2,212,698 Law Enforcement System: Sheriff Contract 16,296,352 16,797,534 16,422,754 Emergency Management Contract 81,116 90,233 84,970 Wages&Benefits 2,618 - 4,887 Operating Supplies 1,696 2,425 2,449 Repair&Maintenance.Supplies 1,713 2,425 2,449 Gas,Oil,&Tires 945 - - Small Tools&Minor Equipment 493 970 980 Electricity/Gas 23,866 33,213 33,545 Water 2,080 2,491 2,516 Sewer 754 830 839 Waste Disposal 3,423 2,906 2,935 Copier Maintenance - 519 - Law Enf. Bldg Maintenance Contract 52,730 77,012 73,419 Contingency - 970,000 53,395 Crywolf Charges&Fees 36,616 - 45,000 Sterling Bank Fees 4,316 - - Crywolf Refunds 1,360 - - Subtotal Law Enforcement System: 16,510,081 17,980,558 16,730,138 Jail System: Jail Contract 492,620 437,661 1,333,131 Jail-Geiger Corrections Center 127,520 - - Work Release(Geiger) 471,530 400,000 - Subtotal Jail System: 1,091,670 837,661 1,333,131 Other: Capital Outlays/Communications 243,670 273,004 271,154 Fines&Forfeitures State Remittance 974,099 873,000 1,057,363 Animal Control Contract 314,255 311,783 315,516 Non-Capital Equipment for JAG Grant 1,707 - - Non-Capital Equip for ARRA JAG Grant 1,946 - - Travel/Mileage 212 - - Building Replacement Costs 80,000 77,600 80,000 Nighttime Seatbelt Patrol Overtime 3,196 - - Hwy 27 Traffic Safety Overtime 4,799 - - X-52 DUI Overtime 7,891 - - Traffic Safety Emergency 5,565 - - Child Car Seat Overtime 3,587 - - Slow Down or Pay Up 6,677 - - Subtotal Other: 1,647,604 1,535,387 1,724,033 Total Public Safety 21,071,640 22,179,880 22,000,000 50 10/18/11 18,000,000 - 16,000,000 - 14,000,000 - 12,000,000 - 10,000,000 - 8,000,000 - 6,000,000 - 4,000,000 - 2,000,000 City of Spokane Valley 2012 Budgeted Contract Expenditures 1,071,588 7 582,643 430,074 16,422,754 84,970 73,419 1,333,131 315,516 District Court Public Defender Prosecutor Sheriff Contract Emergency Law Enf. Bldg Jail Contract Animal Control Contract Contract Contract Management Maintenance Contract Contract Contract 51 10/18/11 Fund: 001 General Fund Spokane Valley Dept: 018 Operations &Administrative Services 2012 Budget 018 -Operations &Administrative Services The Operations &Administrative Services Department is composed of three divisions, the Deputy City Manager Division, the Finance Division, and the Human Resources Division. As of 2007, the Legal Division costs will be included in the Executive and Legislative Support Division. 013 - Deputy City Manager Division The Deputy City Manager(DCM)supervises the Operations &Administrative Services Department, assists the City Manager in organizing and directing the other operations of the City and assumes the duties of the City Manager in his/her absence. Accomplishments for 2011 • Draft and implement a Strategic Communications Plan • Drafted - begin plan in 2012 • Provide media training for authorized spokespersons • Carryover to 2012 Goals • Explore opportunities for economic development •See Legislative and Executive/Legislative accomplishments • Involved all departments in implementation of a citywide comprehensive customer satisfaction program • Customer service request system completed • Communications Plan will be fully implemented upon approval • Help complete contract and purchasing procedures • A draft has been completed and is under review. • Propose service contract amendments to ease administration and allow control of costs • Accomplished. District court and precinct maintenance contracts to be revised to simplify administration and provide equitable cost distribution • Conduct biannual community survey • Survey completed. Results were available in early October. 52 10/18/11 Fund: 001 General Fund Spokane Valley Dept: 018 Operations &Administrative Services 2012 Budget 013- Deputy City Manager Division cont. Goals for 2012 • Provide media training for authorized spokespersons. • Involve all departments in updating and implementing Strategic Communications Plan. • Implement an interactive relationship with prosecution services allowing for comprehensive case management. • Add low cost alternatives to incarceration as options to meet the criminal justice goals of the City. • Begin planning ten year anniversary celebration for the year of 2013 toward promoting city identity for economic development, tourism, and to build community. Budget Summary 2012 2010 2011 Proposed Actual Budget Budget Personnel- FTE Equivalents Deputy City Manager 1.0 1.0 1.0 Senior Administrative Analyst 1.0 1.0 1.0 Public Information Officer 1.0 1.0 1.0 Administrative Analyst 1.0 1.0 1.0 Administrative Assistant 2.0 0.0 1.0 Office Assistant I 1.0 1.0 1.0 Office Assistant II 1.0 1.0 1.0 Total FTEs 8.0 6.0 7.0 Intern 1.0 1.0 1.0 Budget Detail Salaries, Wages, & Benefits $ 415,269 $ 507,410 $ 600,149 Supplies 1,846 2,800 2,850 Services & Charges 27,669 49,730 55,885 Total Deputy City Manager Division $ 444,784 $ 559,940 $ 658,884 53 10/18/11 Fund: 001 General Fund Spokane Valley Dept: 018 Operations &Administrative Services 2012 Budget 014- Finance Division The Finance Division provides financial management services for all City departments. Programs include accounting and reporting, payroll, accounts payable, purchasing, budgeting and financial planning, treasury, information technology and investments. The division is also responsible for generating and analyzing data related to the City's operations. The department prepares monthly, quarterly, and annual financial reports and budgets to ensure compliance with state laws. Accomplishments for 2011 • Implemented State Auditor recommendations. • Improved financial statement process and accuracy • Worked with the Community Development Department to search for and ultimately select the Paladin SmartGov permit tracking software. Began the conversion to the new software in late summer. • Replaced 63 personal computers that reached the end of their life cycle. • Upgraded SQL servers and domain controllers to 2008. • Rolled out WiFi at City buildings. • Began broadcasting and web streaming of City Council meetings. Goals for 2012 • Consider 2010 audit recommendations • Work towards continued improvement and accuracy in the financial statement preparation process. • Complete the installation of the Paladin SmartGov permit tracking software and work with the Community Development Department to monitor actual results against City expectations. • Work with the City Manager and Community Development to move the Permit Center into the main City Hall building and relocate Finance to another location in the building. Assist in negotiations for a revised building lease that is a consequence of the departmental relocations. • Evaluate existing City purchasing system and consider implementing a revision to procurement including the use of purchase requisitions and purchase orders. • Develop a system to audit sales tax receipts and ensure that sales taxes collected by businesses located in Spokane Valley are actually credited to the City as opposed to other municipalities. • Replace 30 personal computers that will reach the end of their life cycle. • Replace 3 servers that will reach the end of their life cycle. • Roll out Microsoft Office 2010. 54 10/18/11 Fund: 001 General Fund Spokane Valley Dept: 018 Operations &Administrative Services 2012 Budget 014- Finance Division cont. 2012 2010 2011 Proposed Actual Budget Budget Personnel - FTE Equivalents Finance &Admin Services Director 1.0 1.0 1.0 Accounting Manager 1.0 1.0 1.0 Accountant/Budget Analyst 4.0 4.0 4.0 Accounting Technician 2.0 2.0 2.0 IT Specialist 3.0 2.0 2.0 GIS/Database Administrator 1.0 1.0 1.0 Total FTEs 12.0 11.0 11.0 Intern 1.0 1.0 0.0 Budget Detail Salaries, Wages, & Benefits $ 840,309 $ 944,992 $ 1,011,932 Supplies 4,228 6,700 3,500 Services &Charges 107,467 62,650 31,675 Total Finance Division $ 952,004 $ 1,014,342 $ 1,047,107 55 10/18/11 Fund: 001 General Fund Spokane Valley Dept: 018 Operations &Administrative Services 2012 Budget 016 - Human Resources Division Human Resources (HR) is administered through the Deputy City Manager (DCM). The HR operation provides services in compensation, benefits, training and organizational development, staffing, employee relations, and communications. Accomplishments for 2011 • Created, tested and implemented the City's On-line Employment Application System • Met the AWC requirements to achieve the WellCity Award • Conducted and/or assisted in recruitment and selection to fill executive vacancies • Researched, reviewed and implemented a new employee performance management system •Assisted in the support of the implementation of on-line employee services Goals for 2012 • Explore AWC Retro Program for possible reductions in workman's compensation rates • Negotiate on behalf of the City to reach a successor labor contract agreement for 2013 • Review and revise City Website to increase service and functionality • Provide employee training in the areas of harrassment prevention and safe-driving. Budget Summary 2012 2010 2011 Proposed Actual Budget Budget Personnel - FTE Equivalents Human Resource Manager 1.0 1.0 1.0 Human Resources Technician 1.0 1.0 1.0 Total FTEs 2.0 2.0 2.0 Budget Detail Salaries, Wages, & Benefits $ 177,182 $ 182,500 $ 189,459 Supplies 1,052 1,967 1,847 Services & Charges 16,208 52,179 38,925 Total Human Resources Division $ 194,442 $ 236,646 $ 230,231 56 10/18/11 Fund:001 General Fund Spokane Valley Dept: 032 Public Works 2012 Budget 032-Public Works The Public Works Department oversees the City's transportation system,which includes construction and maintenance of streets and stormwater systems,operations and maintenance of traffic signs and signals and transportation planning. Accomplishments for 2011 • Designed and constructed funded capital projects. • Developed the 2012-2017 Six Year Transportation Improvement Plan. • Submitted grants for various capital projects Goals for 2012 • Implement approved capital projects. • Provide planning for development of update Transportation Improvement Plan. • Prepare and submit grant applications for capital projects. Budget Summary 2012 2010 2011 Proposed Actual Budget Budget Personnel-FTE Equivalents Public Works Director 1.0 1.0 1.0 Administrative Assistant 2.0 2.0 2.0 Senior Engineer(CIP) 1.0 1.0 1.0 Senior Engineer 2.0 2.0 2.0 Assistant Engineer(CIP) 1.0 1.0 1.0 Limited Term Construction Inspector-Bridge 0.0 1.0 1.0 Maint./Construction Inspector(ROW) 1.0 0.0 0.0 Engineering Technician I 1.0 1.0 1.0 Engineering Technician II 2.0 2.0 2.0 Total FTEs 11.0 11.0 11.0 Budget Detail Salaries,Wages, & Benefits $ 610,394 $705,554 $ 754,769 Supplies 13,733 52,108 36,000 Services&Charges 73,483 134,955 103,750 Capital Outlay 6,346 - 7,000 Total Public Works $ 703,956 $ 892,617 $ 901,519 57 10/18/11 Fund: 001 General Fund Spokane Valley Dept: 050 Community Development-Administrative 2012 Budget Administrative Division The Administrative Division provides overall management and oversight of the Community Development Department including the permitting operation, long-range planning, development engineering, and code compliance and provides staff support through administration of the department's budget, provides administrative support and department training. Accomplishments for 2011 • Continued to provide department wide training to facilitate customer service, teamwork and efficiency • Provided staff support to the Planning Commission. • Provided training to support staff to cover the Planning Commission. • Co-filed Planning and Development Engineering files • Received Certified Floodplain Manager status • Began implementation of the roadmap for enhanced permitting Goals for 2012 • Implement customer service improvements for the department • Assist with new permitting software transition • Improve department website pages. • Continue work on permit process and customer service improvement plan including consolidation of Permit Center into City Hall. • Implement a document control system for documents and forms Budget Summary 2012 2010 2011 Proposed Actual Budget Budget Personnel - FTE Equivalents Community Development Director 1.0 1.0 1.0 Administrative Assistant 1.0 1.0 1.0 Office Assistant I 1.0 0.5 1.0 Total FTEs 3.0 2.5 3.0 Budget Detail Salaries, Wages, & Benefits $ 278,014 $ 279,534 $ 292,643 Supplies 2,510 4,256 4,100 Services &Charges 3,711 22,259 12,000 Intergovernmental Payments 27,366 15,000 15,000 Total Building Division $ 311,601 $ 321,049 $ 323,743 58 10/18/11 Fund: 001 General Fund Spokane Valley Dept: 056 Community Development- Planning Division 2012 Budget Community Development Planning Division The Planning Division is responsible for providing professional policy guidance on land use issues to the City Council and Planning Commission. Planning staff participate at a regional level on issues such as annexations, growth targets, water quality, etc. It is also responsible for processing land use permits, reviewing environmentally sensitive areas, administering the State Environmental Protection Act and reviewing home occupation licenses. Accomplishments for 2011 • Completed the Shoreline Master Program Inventory and Goals and Policies. • Completed the Bike and Pedestrian Plan. •Worked on revisions to the Sprague/Appleway Subarea Plan as directed by Council. •Through the 2011 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Process, eliminated the Sprague Appleway Plan and processed the St John Vianney Comprehensive Map change request. • Continued to work with the region on UGA update process with hopeful adoption by end of 2011. • Began initial work on Economic Development Program. • Completed code amendments for chicken keeping and adult retail uses • Provided training to the Planning Commission on Roberts Rules of Order, permit processing. •Assisted with the ADA Inventory and Plan. • Implementation of the Permit Tracking Software. • Staff attended customer service training and other in-house training to make processes consistent. • Obtained a$125,000 grant to assist with the development of the Shoreline Master Program. • Started parking inventory for multi-tenant buildings in commercial corridors to facilitate tenant improvements. Goals for 2012 • Complete the Shoreline Master Program • Continue to work on Economic Development issues for the City • Complete the 2012 Comprehensive Plan update with a focus on the economic development information. • Continue to work on customer service and improvements to the permit process, including consolidation of the Permit Center into City Hall. • Complete parking inventory project. • 2012 Annual Comprehensive Plan amendments 59 10/18/11 Fund: 001 General Fund Spokane Valley Dept: 056 Community Development- Planning Division 2012 Budget Community Development Services - Planning Division Budget Summary 2012 2010 2011 Proposed Actual Budget Budget Personnel - FTE Equivalents Senior Planner 2.0 2.0 2.0 Planning Manager 1.0 1.0 1.0 Associate Planner 2.0 2.0 2.0 Assistant Planner 3.0 2.5 2.5 Planning Technician 1.0 1.0 1.0 Total FTEs 9.0 8.5 8.5 Budget Detail Salaries, Wages, & Benefits $ 720,832 $ 796,685 $ 822,895 Supplies 6,764 10,588 10,250 Services &Charges 81,415 141,100 86,100 Intergovernmental Services 54,675 75,000 75,000 Total Planning Division $ 863,685 $ 1,023,373 $ 994,245 60 10/18/11 Fund: 001 General Fund Spokane Valley Dept: 055 Community Development-Dev. Engineering 2012 Budget Community Development Enqineerinq Division Development Engineering provides the review and inspection for stormwater, access management and other public works improvements in development applications and provide policy recommendations for public works issues. Accomplishments for 2011 • Completed Hydrology Study for the Forker Draw Floodplain Study • Completed the Sprague/Appleway Business Directional Sign Update • Updated Floodplain and Grading permit Application Forms • Obtained National Floodplain Management Certification • Initiated and Completed the Hanson Industrial Development Agreement •Assisted with the Bike and Pedestrian Plan •Assisted with the ADA Inventory and Plan Goals for 2012 • Update Standard Plans of Street Standards • Continue work on permit process and customer service improvement plan including consolidation of Permit Center into City Hall. • Complete Mapping for the Forker Draw floodplain restudy. • Update Development Engineering's Webpage. Budqet Summary 2012 2010 2011 Proposed Actual Budget Budget Personnel - FTE Equivalents Senior Engineer 1.0 1.0 1.0 Engineer 1.5 1.5 1.5 Assistant Engineer 1.0 0.0 0.0 Engineering Technician 2.5 1.5 1.5 Construction Inspector 1.0 1.0 1.0 Office Assistant I 1.0 1.0 1.0 Total FTEs 8.0 6.00 6.00 Budget Detail Salaries, Wages, & Benefits $ 485,976 $ 544,990 $ 578,346 Supplies 8,095 8,304 7,800 Services&Charges 40,919 71,276 49,650 Intergovernmental Payments 66,479 45,000 45,000 Total Building Division $ 601,470 $ 669,570 $ 680,796 61 10/18/11 Fund:001 General Fund Spokane Valley Dept: 057 Community Development-Building Division 2012 Budget Community Development Building Division The Building Division implements the Washington State Building Code. It is responsible for ensuring that buildings and structures comply with adopted building codes through technical plan review and inspection services. The Permit Center receives applications and coordinates the review and processing of permits. Code compliance staff enforce zoning and building regulations on a complaint-driven basis. ROW inspection program provides inspection services to assure the compliance with the RPCP and the durability and safety of work done in the public ROW. Accomplishments for 2011 • Evaluated Express permitting process resulting in a slightly expanded program and updated information forms. • Completed final legal steps on one abatement. Abatement action pending • Partnered with Spokane County on procurement process for new permit tracking/workflow system. System design and implementation anticipated to be complete by December 2011 • Partnered and coordinated with local builders, Spokane and Spokane County on the implementation of the 2009 Washington State Energy Code. • Completed, compiled and evaluated responses to ADA survey. Continuing work on report and transition plan. Expect to complete project by end of the year. • Participated in and completed initial work on City web-site update. Continuing work on fact checking Community Development website pages. • Finalized long-term interlocal agreement to provide building plan review service to Airway Heights. Goals for 2012 • Continue work on permit process and customer service improvement plan including consolidation of Permit Center into City Hall. • Complete code compliance procedure manual update with legal office. • Monitor and prepare updates for the ADA transition plan. • Maintain partnering efforts with Spokane and Spokane County. • Develop web-access for permit system with IT staff. 62 1 0/1 8/1 1 Fund:001 General Fund Spokane Valley Dept: 058 Community Development-Building Division 2012 Budget Budget Summary 2012 2010 2011 Proposed Actual Budget Budget Personnel-FTE Equivalents Building Official 1.0 1.0 1.0 Building Inspector II 4.0 3.0 3.0 Code Enforcement Officer BP 2.0 2.0 2.0 Construction Inspector 1.0 0.0 0.0 Senior Permit Specialist 1.0 1.0 1.0 Permit Specialist 2.0 2.0 2.0 Senior Plans Examiner 1.0 1.0 1.0 Plans Examiner 0.75 0.75 0.75 Maint/Const Inspector(ROW) 1.0 1.0 1.0 Office Assistant I 1.0 1.0 1.0 Total FTEs 14.75 12.75 12.75 Budget Detail Salaries,Wages, & Benefits $ 968,755 $ 999,983 $ 1,066,404 Supplies 26,107 40,479 35,300 Services&Charges 76,417 101,441 85,350 Intergovernmental Payments 47,890 65,000 65,000 Division 140 Bike&Ped MP-EECBG 50,766 - - Interfund Charges - 8,400 8,400 Total Building Division $ 1,169,935 $ 1,215,303 $ 1,260,454 63 10/18/11 Fund: 0 General Fund Spokane Valley Dept: 07 Parks & Recreation 2012 Budget 076 - Parks & Recreation The Parks and Recreation Department is composed of five divisions, the Administration and Park Maintenance Division, Recreation, Aquatics, Senior Center, and the CenterPlace Division. The overall goal of the department is to provide quality recreation programs and acquisition, renovation, development, operation, and maintenance of parks and recreation facilities. 000 - Parks Administration & Maintenance Division The Administration Division provides direction and leadership for the Parks and Recreation Department in implementing the goals and objectives of the City Council and facilitates the general upkeep of parks and public areas of the City. Accomplishments for 2011 • Completed construction of Greenacres Park. • Constructed new picnic shelter at Terrace View Park. • Renovated turf& irrigation at south end of Mirabeau Point Park campus. • Intend to finalize Centennial Trail maintenance agreement. • Continued discussions on development of dog park. Goals for 2012 • Replace play equipment at Terrace View Park. • Bring new Greenacres Park online. • Begin development of a dog park. Budget Summary 2012 2010 2011 Proposed Actual Budget Budget Personnel- FTE Equivalents Parks & Recreation Director 1.0 1.0 1.0 Administrative Assistant 1.0 1.0 1.0 Total FTEs 2.0 2.0 2.0 Budget Detail Salaries, Wages, & Benefits $ 192,316 $ 199,420 $ 202,978 Supplies 46,621 59,100 61,600 Services & Charges 647,942 677,250 781,050 Intergovernmental Services 10,379 10,000 11,000 Interfund Charges - 3,200 3,200 Total Parks Administration $ 897,258 $ 948,970 $ 1,059,828 64 10/18/11 Fund: 001 General Fund Spokane Valley Dept: 076 Parks & Recreation 2012 Budget 301 - Recreation Division The Recreation Division coordinates and facilitates the delivery of recreation programs and service throughout the City and The City's Park system. Accomplishments for 2011 • Continued to provide Recreation Programs for a variety of ages. • Offered an Outdoor Summer Dodge Ball League with Spokane County and the City of Spokane. • Hosted Environmental Special Event&Tree Planting Event"Discovery Spring" at Discovery Playground. • Continued to partner with the City of Liberty Lake to jointly offer and advertise Recreation Programs. • Started to offer very successful "Mommy and Me" music program for preschool aged children and their parents. • In partnership with the Valley YMCA, hosted a Zumbathon event bringing over 300 people into CenterPlace. Goals for 2012 • Continue to partner and jointly offer programs with Liberty Lake, Spokane County and the City of Spokane • Create wellness and health service provider partnerships within the Community. • Solicit sponsorships for the summer outdoor movies Budget Summary 2012 2010 2011 Proposed Actual Budget Budget Personnel - FTE Equivalents Recreation Coordinator 1.0 1.0 1.0 Budget Detail Salaries, Wages, & Benefits $ 130,323 $ 145,365 $ 149,911 Supplies 4,051 10,943 9,250 Services &Charges 47,595 82,720 64,650 Interfund Charges 6,654 7,600 6,000 Capital Outlay - - - Total Parks Administration $ 188,623 $ 246,628 $ 229,811 65 10/18/11 Fund: 001 General Fund Spokane Valley Dept: 076 Parks& Recreation 2012 Budget 302-Aquatics Division The City of Spokane Valley owns three pools: Park Road Pool, Terrace View Pool, and Valley Mission Pool. Services include open swim, swim lessons, swim team and facility rentals. In addition,the City leases a portion of Valley Mission Park to Splashdown Inc. for a water park. The City currently is contracting with the YMCA for all aquatic activities within the City. The YMCA provides the lifeguards and maintains the pools during the season. Accomplishments for 2011 • Worked with the "Make a Splash" campaign and Spokane Valley Partners to increase scholarship funding. • A rental package for swimming pools was developed. Goals for 2012 • Maintain full summer swimming program. Budqet Summary 2012 2010 2011 Proposed Actual Budget Budget Budget Detail Supplies $ 945 $ 3,000 $ 3,000 Services&Charges 419,789 426,250 439,250 Intergovernmental Services - - - $ 420,734 $ 429,250 $ 442,250 Total Aquatics Division 66 10/18/11 Fund:001 General Fund Spokane Valley Dept: 076 Parks&Recreation 2012 Budget 304-Senior Center Division The City of Spokane Valley Parks and Recreation Department assumed operational control of the Valley Senior Center in 2003. Accomplishments for 2011 • Researched and organized information to complete a notebook at the Reeception Desk for Volunteers with numerous agencies and contact information that seniors request. Along with the notebook,on hand is The Senior Directory Resource Guide to Spokane and the Inland Northwest. • Hosted 3rd Annual Resource Fair/Senior Empowerment Exposition. There were 39 vendors and approximately 250 attendees. • New for 2011: Hospice Bereavement Group, Chair Massage, Mandela Art, SHIBA with Aging and Long Term Care of Eastern Washington assisting people with the best Medicare choice for their individual needs. • Continued to work with the Board of Directors regarding their training and educational opportunities. • provided training for front desk volunteers. • Advertised and offered activities and trips through other senior centers. Goals for 2012 • Assist the Board of Directors to be in compliance with the Washington State Department of Revenue regarding their non-profit status. • Continue to utilize the Wellness Center and offer more services. • Continue to work with the Retirement Communities to involve their residents in activities. • Continue outreach and involvement with the Washington State Association of Senior Centers. Budget Summary 2012 2010 2011 Proposed Actual Budget Budget Personnel-FTE Equivalents Senior Center Specialist 1.0 1.0 1.0 Total FTEs 1.0 1.0 1.0 Intern 1.0 1.0 1.0 Budget Detail Salaries,Wages, & Benefits $ 69,848 $ 74,953 $ 77,320 Supplies 958 5,100 5,240 Services&Charges 2,737 8,900 10,400 Capital Outlay - 700 - Total Senior Center Division $ 73,543 $ 89,653 $ 92,960 67 10/18/11 Fund:001 General Fund Spokane Valley Dept: 076 Parks&Recreation 2012 Budget 305-CenterPlace Division Construction of Mirabeau Point CenterPlace began in late 2003, and was completed mid-year 2005. The project represents the culmination of eight years of planning and fundraising by Mirabeau Point Inc. and the joint involvement of the City and Spokane County. The approximately 54,000 square foot facility houses the City of Spokane Valley Senior Center, a great room(banquet facility), numerous meeting rooms, multi-purpose rooms, and a high tech lecture hall. The facility combines with Mirabeau Meadows Parks and Mirabeau Springs to form a regional focal point for Northeast Washington and Northern Idaho. Accomplishments for 2011 • Developed a list of meeting planners to promote CenterPlace through target marketing. • Utilized CenterPlace marketing materials to promote tourism to Spokane Valley. • Enclosed patio area with a fence to add value to the great room rental. Encouraged diversity in our facility rentals by evaluating our forms and brochures for • language barriers. Goal for 2012 • Create an updated marketing plan for the next five years. This marketing plan will help create name recognition for CenterPlace and develop more corporate reservations. • Implement changes to our forms and brochures that would decrease language barriers and encourage diversity. • Continue to work with other agencies to promote tourism to Spokane Valley. Budget Summary 2012 2010 2011 Proposed Actual Budget Budget Personnel- FTE Equivalents Customer Relations/Facilities Coordinator 1.0 1.0 1.0 Administrative Assistant 2.0 1.0 1.0 Office Assistant I 0.0 1.0 1.0 Custodian 2.0 0.0 0.0 Maintenance Worker 2.0 2.0 2.0 Total FTEs 7.0 5.0 5.0 Budget Detail Salaries, Wages, &Benefits $ 343,598 $ 370,955 $ 381,403 Supplies 70,411 70,952 78,876 Services&Charges 351,360 336,877 342,078 lnterfund Charges 334,332 354,000 324,000 Total CenterPlace Division $ 1,099,701 $ 1,132,784 $ 1,126,357 68 10/18/11 Fund:001 General Fund Spokane valley Dept: 090 General Government 2012 Budget 090-General Government The General Government Department comprises activities that encompass services to multiple departments. Included in this department are the costs of City Hall and related utilities, management information services, insurance costs, miscellaneous city intergovernmental costs and capital equipment costs that benefit more than one department, and outside agency funding. Outside agencies provide needed public services on behalf of the City. The outside agencies must provide an annual report of how the money was spent. Budget Summary 2012 2010 2011 Proposed Actual Budget Budget Budget Detail General Citywide Costs Accounting&Audit Services $ 67,061 $ 95,000 $ 90,000 Advertising 212 - - Merchant Charges(Bankcard Fees) 18,273 25,000 25,000 Copier 18,502 20,000 20,000 Economic Development-Site Selector 9,973 15,000 15,000 Election Costs - 30,000 80,000 Employee Recognition Safety&Bicycle Safety 2,192 8,000 10,000 EECBG Utilities Partnering Program 1,542 - - Equipment Repair&Maintenance 33,241 30,000 35,000 Gas,Oil,&Tires 553 - - General Operating Leases:Computers 29,847 60,000 45,000 IT Support-Network 78,521 160,000 100,000 Miscellaneous 1,154 15,000 15,000 Non Capital Comp.soft/hardware 21,082 - 30,000 Office and Operating Supplies 13,827 20,000 20,000 Office Supplies 2,077 - - Other Governmental Services - 25,000 - Postage 2,611 20,000 5,000 Printing and Binding 2,142 5,000 5,000 Non Capital Office Furniture&Equip. 749 Registrations 1,784 2,000 2,000 Small Tools&Minor Equipment 1,224 - 1,500 Software Licenses and Maintenance 11,812 100,000 55,000 Telephone/DSL Charges 29,022 25,000 30,000 Vehicle Rental 6,613 12,000 7,000 Taxes&assessments 4,923 7,000 7,000 Web Site Services 3,000 - - Interfund If Risk Mng. Insurance premium 502 318,000 319,000 319,000 Interfund Loan to Street Fund(winter weather reserve) - - - Interfund Transfer to Capital Projects 100,000 - - Interfund Transfer to Street Capital 2011+ - 500,000 - Interfund Transfer to full paveback-Fund 303 929,048 1,500,000 89,500 Interfund Transfer to Parks Capital Fund - 100,000 100,000 Facilities Facility Repairs&Maintenance 1,375 5,000 30,000 Computer Software/Hardware 6,898 - - Computer Software/Hardware Replacement - - - Office Furniture&Equipment - 65,000 35,000 Energy Conservation Improvement - 50,000 - ADA Inventory - - - City Hall Leasing Costs: City Hall Rent 452,602 465,000 480,000 Leasehold Improvements - - - 69 10/18/11 Fund:001 General Fund Spokane valley Dept: 090 General Government 2012 Budget 090-General Government Budget Summary-continued Outside Services Alcohol Treatment 23,176 23,000 25,000 City Economic Development - 3,000 75,000 Community Survey 92 - - Professional Services-Project Access 20,000 - - Memberships-SRTC 34,300 - - Records Management 27,474 100,000 70,000 Requests from Outside Agencies-Economic Development 60,000 114,000 105,000 Requests from Outside Agencies-Social Services 53,985 45,000 60,000 Spokane County Air Pollution Authority 115,084 117,000 117,000 Voter Registrations 57,736 62,000 62,000 Contingency&Reserves Contingency/Emergency(1%of recurring expenditures) - - 346,600 Broadcasting Council meetings - 46,000 - PERS/L&I Set Aside - 100,000 50,000 Contingency - 330,750 134,000 $ 2,561,707 $ 4,618,750 $ 2,695,600 * Estimated ending balance of$18,599,813 was removed from 2010 budget 70 10/18/11 Fund: 101 Street Fund Spokane Valley Dept: 042 2012 Budget 101 -Street Fund The Street Operating Program is established to provide efficient and safe movement of both motorized and non-motorized vehicles, as well as pedestrians within the limits of the City, and coordinate convenient interconnect to the regional transportation system. Maintenace work includes snow and ice control, street pavement repairs, traffic signals and signs, landscaping and vegetation control and many other street maintenance and repair activities. Accomplishments for 2011 • Updated the 2011 Street Master Plan. • Optimized traffic signals on selected corridors. • Applied for grants and work with various schools to install flashing beacons at crosswalks. • Renewed Contracts with private contractors for street maintenance services. • Purchased street maintenance shop and facility. • Completed LED traffic signal upgrades supported by funds from Federal Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant Program. Goals for 2012 • Optimize traffic signals on selected corridors . • Apply for grants and work with various schools to install flashing beacons at crosswalks. • Renew Contracts with private contractors for street maintenance services. • Continue with the development and implementation of a winter operations program. Budget Summary 2012 2010 2011 Proposed Actual Budget Budget Personnel-FTE Equivalents Senior Engineer-Traffic 1.0 1.0 1.0 Public Works Superintendent 1.0 1.0 1.0 Maintenance/Construction Inspector 1.0 1.5 1.5 Assistant Engineer-Traffic/Planning 2.0 1.0 1.0 Senior Engineer(Planning/Grants) 0_0 0_0 0_0 Total FTEs 5.0 4.5 4.5 Interns 1.0 1.0 1.0 Budget Detail Salaries, Wages, & Benefits $ 326,561 $ 433,931 $ 522,142 Supplies 65,712 72,200 72,200 Services &Charges 2,679,369 3,807,296 3,910,321 Capital Outlay 35,092 45,000 40,000 Intergovernmental Payments 732,584 947,000 847,000 Interfund Charges and End Fund Bal 73,975 77,900 39,600 Total Street Fund $ 3,913,293 $ 5,383,327 $ 5,431,263 71 10/18/11 Fund: 103 Trails & Paths Fund Spokane Valley Dept: 103 2012 Budget 103 -Trails & Paths Fund The Trails & Paths Fund accounts for the receipt and expenditure of the State-Levied Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax distributed to the City in accordance with State RCW 47.30.050. These revenues originate from .42% of Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax attributable to Street Maintenance. These funds are restricted for constructing new trails and paths throughout the City. $0 Fund: 105 Hotel/Motel Fund Spokane Valley Dept: 105 2012 Budget 105- Hotel/Motel Fund The Hotel/Motel Fund accounts for the receipt and expenditure of a special excise tax of two percent on the sale or charge made for the furnishing of lodging under RCW 82.08. These funds will be used solely for the purpose of paying all or any part of the cost of tourist promotion, acquisition or operation of tourism-related facilities, and marketing of special events and festivals designed to attract tourists. Budget Summary 2012 2010 2011 Proposed Actual Budget Budget Budget Detail Tourism Promotion $ 362,302 $ 500,000 $ 400,700 Interfund Transfers -#001 37,500 - 30,000 Total Hotel/Motel Fund $ 399,802 $ 500,000 $ 430,700 72 10/18/11 Fund: 120 CenterPlace Operating Reserve Fund Spokane Valley Dept: 120 2012 Budget 120 - CenterPlace Operating Reserve Fund The CenterPlace Operating Reserve Fund was established to provide an emergency revenue source for the recently completed facility. Budget Summary 2012 2010 2011 Proposed Actual Budget Budget Budget Detail Reserve for CenterPlace Operations $ - $ - $ - Fund: 121 Service Level Stabilization Reserve Fund Spokane Valley Dept: 121 2012 Budget 121 - Service Level Stabilization Reserve Fund The Service Level Stabilization Reserve Fund was established to provide an emergency revenue source to maintain service levels in the event of a downturn in the local economy. Budget Summary 2012 2010 2011 Proposed Actual Budget Budget Budget Detail Reserve For Service Level Stabilization 73 10/18/11 Fund: 122 Winter Weather Reserve Fund Spokane Valley Dept: 122 2012 Budget 122 - Winter Weather Reserve Fund The Winter Weather Reserve Fund was established to provide emergency services during an unusually harsh winter. Budget Summary 2012 2010 2011 Proposed Actual Budget Budget Budget Detail Reserve for Winter Weather $ - $ 505,000 $ - Fund: 123 Civic Facility Replacement Fund Spokane Valley Dept: 122 2012 Budget 123 - Civic Facility Replacement Fund This fund was created to set aside money for the eventual replacement of CenterPlace and the Police Precinct Building on East Sprague. Source of funds is an annual transfer from the General Fund. Budget Summary 2012 2010 2011 Proposed Actual Budget Budget Budget Detail Reserve for Facility Replacement 74 10/18/11 Fund:204 Limited Tax General Obligation - Debt Service Fund Spokane Valley Dept: 204 2012 Budget 204- Limited Tax General Obligation - Debt Service Fund The LTGO - Debt Service Fund collects and distributes monies received and paid for long-term debt obligations. Revenue to this fund consists of money received from the Public Facility District and City revenue, which will be used to pay annual debt obligations on outstanding bonds. Budget Summary 2012 2010 2011 Proposed Actual Budget Budget Budget Detail Debt Service on Mirabeau Bonds $ 421,987 $ 460,000 $ 432,320 Debt Service on Street Bonds 183,586 225,000 185,303 Total Debt Service Fund $ 605,573 $ 685,000 $ 617,623 75 10/18/11 Fund: 301/302 Capital Projects & Special Capital Projects Funds Spokane Valley 2012 Budget 301/302 - Capital Projects & Special Capital Projects Funds These funds account for the collection and expenditure of the real estate excise tax levied on all sales of real estate. The tax is levied in two phases of a quarter of a percent each. The first quarter percent of the real estate excise tax (REET 1) must be spent on capital improvements identified in a capital improvements plan. This REET 1 tax is accounted for in the Capital Projects Fund 301. The second quarter percent (REET 2) may only be levied by cities that are planning under the Growth Management Act. These funds must be used for a capital project. The REET 2 tax is accounted for in the Special Capital Projects Fund 302. Revenues accumulated in these funds will be used as matching funds for construction projects and will be transferred to other Capital Project Funds. Budget Summary 2012 2010 2011 Proposed Actual Budget Budget 301 - Capital Proiects Fund Intergovernmental Services $ 899,565 $ 901,098 $ 363,627 Interfund Transfer-out - #204 91,978 112,500 92,652 Interfund Transfer-out - #303 - - - Interfund Transfers - - - Total Capital Projects Fund $ 991,543 $ 1,013,598 $ 456,279 302 - Special Capital Proiects Fund Interfund Transfer-out - #204 $ - $ 112,500 $ 92,651 Interfund Transfer-out - #303 - 897,393 1,448,059 Interfund Transfer-out - #307 - 41,176 - Interfund Transfer-out - #308 - 150,000 - Interfund Transfers 594,536 - - Total Special Capital Projects Fund $ 594,536 $ 1,201,069 $ 1,540,710 76 10/18/11 Fund: 303 Street Capital Projects Fund Spokane Valley 2012 Budget 303-Street Capital Projects Fund The Street Capital Projects Fund accounts for monies used to finance the 6-year Transportation Improvement Plan. Revenues are transfers from the Capital Projects Fund, Special Capital Projects Fund, and the Stormwater Fund. Expenditures are often for matching funds for Transportation Improvement Board and other grants. Budget Summary 2012 2010 2011 Proposed Actual Budget Budget Budget Detail Road Design&Construction Projects 24th Ave-Sullivan to 22nd - - 278,520 Argonne Road-190 to Trent 22,587 581,886 802,792 Broadway @ Argonne&Mullen PCC, (PE, RW) - 271,000 138,150 Broadway Avenue Safety Project Pines-Park 74,127 834,000 - Broadway Ave. Rehabilitation proj#2 949 - - Broadway/Sullivan PCC Intersection 723,739 - - Greenacres Trail-Design - - 60,000 In-House Design-Sidewalk Infi11 - - 398,250 Indiana/Sullivan Intersection PCC 54,061 1,171,200 - Indiana Avenue Extension-3600'e/o Sullivan 189,479 200,000 - Mansfield Ave. Connection - 488,000 738,000 Mission Ave-Flora to Barker(PE&RW) - - 300,000 Park Road-#2(PE Only)-Broadway to Indiana 87,146 35,000 - Pines(SR27)ITS Improvement SRTC 06-26 3,721 1,843,221 1,766,201 Pines/Mansfield 110,178 450,000 463,312 2009 ADA Improvements 96,449 - - Sprague Resurface-E'green to Sull.ADA 2,946 - 1,582,000 Sidewalk&Transit Stop Accessibility - - 182,290 Spokane Valley-Millwood Trail - - 447,000 Sullivan Euclid PCC PE, ROW - 163,000 26,289 Sullivan Rd W Bridge Replacement - - 600,000 STEP Projects 1,213,837 1,900,000 - Misc. Road Projects-Safety 72,849 - - Sullivan/Sprague PCC 957,843 - - University Rd/I-90 Overpass Study - - 284,000 WSDOT Urban Ramp Projects 45,000 - - Contingency - 500,000 1,500,000 Total Street Capital Projects Fund $ 3,654,911 $ 8,437,307 $ 9,566,804 77 10/18/11 Fund: 304 Mirabeau Point Capital Project Fund Spokane Valley Dept: 304 2012 Budget 304 - Mirabeau Point Capital Project Fund Mirabeau Point is a multi-use regional project located at 2426 Discovery Place which will be operated by the City. The bond sale proceeds were spent in 2003, 2004, and 2005. CenterPlace provides space for a Conference Center Wing, Senior Center Wing and a Great Room Wing. The portion of CenterPlace used for the Conference Center Wing and Great Room Wing is being developed as a "regional facility" as defined in RCW 36.100 and 35.57.020. Budget Summary 2012 2010 2011 Proposed Actual Budget Budget Budget Detail Transfer to Civic Facility Replacement Fund $ - $ - $ - Reserve for Replacement - - - Construction in Progress - - - Total Mirabeau Point Project Fund - $ - $ - Fund: 306 CD Block Grant Fund Spokane Valley Dept: 306 2012 Budget 306 -CD Block Grant Fund Budget Summary 2012 2010 2011 Proposed Actual Budget Budget Budget Detail Transfer to Street Capital Projects (303) $ - $ - $ - Transfer to Capital Grant Fund - - - Total CD Block Grant Fund 78 10/18/11 Fund: 307 Capital Grants Fund Spokane Valley Dept: 307 2012 Budget 307 -Capital Grants Fund The Capital Grants Fund accounts for capital improvement projects funded partially by grant proceeds from other governmental agencies, such as Transportation Improvement Board, Spokane Transit Authority, Surface Transportation Program, and Community Development Block Grant. Revenues to this fund are from grant proceeds and transfers from other special revenue funds. Budget Summary 2012 2010 2011 Proposed Actual Budget Budget Budget Detail 44th Ave Pathway: Woodruff Rd. to Sands Rd. $ 360,234 $ 5,000 $ - Broadway Ave. Rehab- Bates to Slvn 4,986 - - Appleway/Sprague/Dishman ITS 190-Dishman-066 2,880 50,000 - Argonne Road Overlay- Indiana to Montgomery 2,931 - - Broadway Ave- Moore to Flora 1,626,735 150,000 - Miscellaneous - 129 - Total Capital Grants Fund $ 1,997,766 $ 205,129 $ - Fund: 308 Barker Bridge - Federal Grant Fund Spokane Valley Dept: 308 2012 Budget 308 - Barker Bridge - Federal Grant Fund The Barker Bridge- Federal Grant Fund was created to account for the revenues and expenditures associated with the Barker Road Bridge Replacement Project. This project was funded by BRAC grant proceeds and City match cost approximately $11,600,000 over the course of the several years. Budget Summary 2012 2010 2011 Proposed Actual Budget Budget Budget Detail Barker Road Bridge Reconstruction $ 1,248,352 $ 150,000 $ - 79 10/18/11 Fund: 309 Parks Capital Projects Fund Spokane Valley Dept: 309 2012 Budget 309-Parks Capital Projects Fund The Parks Capital Projects Fund is specifically designated for Parks and Recreation Capital improvements. Budget Summary 2012 2010 2011 Proposed Actual Budget Budget Budget Detail Contingency $ 55,106 $ 100,000 $ 50,000 Greenacres Park - 1,559,036 - Terrace View Park Shelter - $ 80,000 $ - Terrace View Park Play Equipment 23,489 - 120,000 Valley Mission Park - - - Discovery(Universal) Park 39,133 -191,305 - - Total Parks Capital Project Fund 309,032 1,739,036 170,000 Fund: 310 Civic Facilities Capital Projects Fund Spokane Valley Dept: 310 2012 Budget 310-Civic Facilities Capital Projects Fund The Civic Buildings Capital Projects Fund is an allocated reserve of monies specifically designated for future construction of Civic Facilities. The 2011 costs are for full width paveback above newly installed county sewer lines and street capital projects. Budget Summary 2012 2010 2011 Proposed Actual Budget Budget Transfer to General Fund 946,914 2,000,000 - Total Civic Buildings Capital Fund $ 946,914 $ 2,000,000 $ - 80 10/18/11 Fund: 311 Street Capital Improvement 2011+ Spokane Valley Dept: 311 2012 Budget 311 -Street Capital Improvement 2011+ This fund was created during the 2011 Budget development process for the purpose of setting money aside for yet to be determined street capital improvement projects. In the 2011 Budget the City Council made the decision to make an initial transfer of$500,000 from the General Fund to this Fund#311. In addition, the Council made the decision to transfer from the General Fund an additional amount equal to 40%of the General Fund's audited fund balance at December 31, 2010. The 2010 ending fund balance was $27,461,703 which resulted in an additional 2011 transfer of$584,681 (computed as ($27,461,703-$26,000,000)x 40%). In the 2012 Budget the City is appropriating all money estimated to be available for street related capital improvement projects. Budget Summary 2012 2010 2011 Proposed Actual Budget Budget Budget Detail Street Capital Improvement 2011+ $ - $ - $ 1,086,881 Total Street Capital Improvement Fund - - 1,086,881 81 10/18/11 Fund:402 Stormwater Management Fund Spokane Valley Dept: 402 2012 Budget 402-Stormwater Management Fund The Stormwater Management fund accounts for receipt and expenditure of the Stormwater fee. This fee is levied on an annual basis based upon a number of equivalent residential units attached to the parcel. The stormwater funds are used for stormwater management, maintenance and construction of the City's stormwater system. Accomplishments for 2011 • Designed/Constructed stormwater improvements at over 20 locations throughout the City •Completed/implemented major tasks associated with the State mandated Phase II Stormwater Permit. •Completed initial assessment work on State mandated Underground Injection Control Program (due 2013). •Aquired maintenance property for future decant facility. •Completed stormwater assessment rolls, updated the commercial impervious surfaces map. • Bid contracts for Landscaping,and Structure Cleaning Services. •Secured grant dollars to support sweeping and structure cleaning operations. Goals for 2012 • Further refine structure inspection program and cleaning(vactoring)intervals •Complete Underground Injection Control(UIC)Assessment/Testing(due early 2013) • Begin designing projects and/or securing property for Stormwater Capital Improvements •Continue work on receiving permits for,and design,a vactor liquid decant facility. • Begin work to eliminate stormwater discharges to surface waters of the state from city streets. Budget Summary 2012 2010 2011 Proposed Actual Budget Budget Personnel-FTE Equivalents Engineer 1.0 1.0 1.0 Engineering Technician II 1.0 1.0 1.0 Assistant Engineer 1.0 1.0 1.0 Maintenance/Construction Inspector 1.0 1.5 1.5 Total FTEs 4.0 4.5 4.5 Interns 2.0 2.0 1.0 Budget Detail Salaries,Wages, &Benefits $ 344,654 $ 418,000 $ 438,614 Supplies 26,358 43,100 32,540 Services&Charges 885,284 1,341,905 1,242,720 Intergovernmental Services 50,289 146,640 23,000 Capital Outlays 275,120 300,000 400,000 Interfund Transfers/Unassigned Ending FB 62,016 - 16,567 Total Stormwater Fund $ 1,643,721 $ 2,249,645 $ 2,153,441 82 10/18/11 Fund:403 Aquifer Protection Area Spokane Valley Dept: 403 2012 Budget 403-Aquifer Protection Area The Aquifer Protection Area Fund was created in 2011 to account for aquifer protection area fees collected by Spokane County and remitted to the City. Historically, Spokane County has collected the fee from local residents and expended the proceeds on projects in Spokane Valley. By mutual agreement, beginning in 2011 all monies collected by the County are now remitted to the City for use in City directed projects that will protect the aquifer. We estimate the fees will generate annual revenue of approximately$500,000. Neither the 2011 or 2012 City Budgets have appropriated any of the annual revenues or fund balance for projects. When appropriate projects are identified in 2012,the budget will be amended to accommodate the expected expenditures. Budget Summary 2012 2010 2011 Proposed Actual Budget Budget Budget Detail Facilities $ - $ - $ - Total Aquifer Protection Area 83 10/18/11 Fund: 501 Equipment Rental & Replacement Fund Spokane Valley 2012 Budget 501 - Equipment Rental & Replacement Fund The Equipment Rental & Replacement Fund (ER&R) accounts for the cost of maintaining and replacing City vehicles and equipment for all City departments. The ER&R fund is an Internal Service fund. The fund accumulates the resources for vehicle and equipment replacements in the fund. The funds or departments using the vehicle or equipment pay the scheduled replacement fee. Replacement funds are being collected on the telephone system, computer network system, desktop computers, and vehicles. Maintenance and service charges for copiers, telephones, and the internet are also charged to funds through this department. The fund also finances and administers a fleet of pool cars for use by City departments. Goals for 2011 • Combine this fund in the General Fund with funding intact. Budget Summary 2012 2010 2011 Proposed Actual Budget Budget Budget Detail Computer replacement lease - Software/Hardware replacement - - - Vehicle Replacement - - All other - 209,000 - Total ER&R Fund $ - $ 209,000 $ - 84 10/18/11 Fund: 502 Risk Management Fund Spokane Valley Dept: 502 2012 Budget 502 - Risk Management Fund The City of Spokane Valley Risk Management Fund is established to account for insurance costs, claims settlement and administration of a Risk Management Safety Program. This fund also accounts for the funding of unemployment claims through the State of Washington. Budget Summary 2012 2010 2011 Proposed Actual Budget Budget Budget Detail Interfund Transfer-#001 $ 309,724 $ 319,000 $ 319,000 Total Risk Management Fund $ 309,724 $ 319,000 $ 319,000 85 10/18/11 Department Capital Outlay Description City of Spokane Valley Capital Expenditures for 2012 FTA through 301 302 Surface Congestion Spokane Various 2012 Real Estate Real Estate Transportation Management Transit WA Dept.of Grant Propsed Budget Excise Tax 1 Excise Tax 2 Program Air Quality Authority TIB:SP BR Ecology EECBG Sources City Funds 303 Street Capital Fund CIP# Road Design&Construction Projects 0146 24th Ave Sidewalk Adams to Sullivan $ 278,520 0060 Argonne Road-190 to Trent 802,792 0142 Broadway @ Argonne&Mullan PCC int,(PE/RW) 138,150 0148 Greenacres Trail-Design 60,000 0149 In-House Design-Sidewalk Infill 398,250 Mansfield Ave.Connection 738,000 0123 Mission Ave-Flora to Barker(PE&RW) 300,000 0061 Pines(SR27)ITS Improvements 1,766,201 0005 Pines Mansfield 463,312 0154 Sidewalk&Transit Stop Accessibility 182,290 0145 Spokane Valley-Millwood Trail 447,000 0115 Sprague Ave.Resurfacing-Evergreen to Sullivan 1,582,000 0155 Sullivan Rd W Bridge Replacement 600,000 0141 Sullivan Rd/Euclid PCC(PE/RW) 26,289 University Rd/I-90 Overpass Study 284,000 Contingency 1 1,500,000 303 Street Capital Fund Subtotal Grants 46,540 18,650 238,437 144,600 79,050 100,000 39,090 463,312 36,458 188,000 120,000 3,549 34,000 60,000 240,000 119,500 260,910 447,000 1,394,000 22,740 756,252 316,200 638,000 1,527,764 250,000 145,832 133,920 480,000 60,000 3,000 1,200,000 $ 9,566,804 363,627 1,448,059 309 Parks Capital Projects Terrace View Park Play Equipment $ 120,000 Contingency 1 50,000 309 Parks Capital Projects $ 170,000 402 Stormwater Fund 2 0150 Sullivan Rd.Bridge Drain Retrofit $ 204,889 402 Stormwater Fund $ 204,889 Total Capital Expenditures 2,244,150 3,488,216 145,832 133,920 480,000 - 63,000 1,200,000 204,889 204,889 $ 9,941,693 $ 363,627 $ 1,448,059 $ 2,244,150 $ 3,488,216 $ 145,832 $ 133,920 $ 480,000 $ 204,889 $ 63,000 $ 1,200,000 1 Contingency amount is to cover unforseen overruns,costs related to projects that were expected to complete in 2011 and the costs of projects that have not yet had funding sources identified. 2 Amounts not assigned to a city fund or a grant source will be paid by fund project is listed under. 86 10/18/11 City of Spokane Valley FTE Count by Year 2012 Budget 2010 2011 Budget 2011 Budget 2012 Authorized Changes to Authorized Interns Proposed Interns Department FTEs FTEs FTEs for 2011 FTEs for 2012 Executive & Legislative Support City Manager 5.0 5.0 (1.0) 5.0 Legal 3.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 Operations &Administrative Services: Deputy City Manager 8.0 (2.0) 6.0 1.0 7.0 1.0 Finance 12.0 (1.0) 11.0 1.0 11.0 Human Resources 2.0 2.0 2.0 Public Works 11.0 11.0 11.0 Planning &Community Development: Admin 3 3.00 3.00 Engineering 8 (2.0) 6.00 6.00 Planning 9 (0.5) 8.50 8.50 Building 14.75 (2.0) 12.75 12.75 Parks & Recreation: Parks Admin 2.0 2.0 2.0 Recreation 1.0 1.0 1.0 Senior Center 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 CenterPlace 7.0 (2.0) 5.0 5.0 Street Fund 5.0 (0.5) 4.5 1.0 4.5 1.0 Stormwater Fund 4.0 0.5 4.5 2.0 4.5 1.0 TOTAL 95.75 (9.50) 86.25 7.00 87.25* 7.00 ** *No change in staffing level from 2011. Actual Authorized position count in 2011 was 87.25 **The intern count is not reported as a full-time equivalent employee (2,080 hours) but instead simply represents the number of individuals working in a given deaprtment. 87 10/18/11 2011 Work Force Comparison: The 29 Washington Communities with a Population of 100,000 or Less CITY POPULATION FULL-TIME PART-TIME Bellingham 81 ,070 748 30 Yakima 91 ,630 690 18 Renton 92,590 647 19 Redmond 55,150 594 25 Olympia * 46,780 No Response No Response Richland 49,090 466 30 Kirkland 49,020 436 28 Auburn 70,705 408 4 Bremerton 38,790 332 21 Lynnwood 35,860 329 13 Kennewick 74,665 327 7 Federal Way 89,370 289 17 Longview 36,730 286 9 Bothell 33,720 281 14 Pasco 61 ,000 277 8 Puyallup 37,240 275 20 Lacey 42,830 247 3 Walla Walla 31 ,670 241 15 Marysville 60,660 238 10 Lakewood 58,190 235 9 Issaquah 30,690 228 24 Edmonds 39,800 207 6 Mount Vernon 31 ,940 184 22 Wenatchee 32,090 177 5 Shoreline 53,200 127 15 Spokane Valley* 90,110 87 5 Sammamish 46,940 66 4 Burien 47,660 64 12 University Place 31 ,170 45 7 AVERAGE 305 16 Source: Association of Washington Cities Survey: 2011 Full Time 8/31/2011 * Not Calculated in Average 88 10/18/11 Appendix A EMPLOYEE POSITION CLASSIFICATION MONTHLY SALARY SCHEDULE 2012 Salary Schedule Effective 1/1/2012 Position Title Grade 2012 Range City Manager Unclassified Deputy City Manager 21-22 8,888.29 - 12,661.08 City Attorney 21 8,671.50 - 11,395.08 Community Development Director 21 8,671.50 - 11,395.08 Finance Director 21 8,671.50 - 11,395.08 Public Works Director 21 8,671.50 - 11,395.08 Parks and Recreation Director 19 7,199.37 - 9,230.79 Human Resources Manager 18 6,480.26 - 8,307.29 Planning Manager 18 6,480.26 - 8,307.29 Building Official 18 6,480.26 - 8,307.29 Senior Engineer-Capital Projects, Development 18 6,480.26 - 8,307.29 Deputy City Attorney 18 6,480.26 - 8,307.29 Senior Engineer-Traffic,CIP Planning/Grants 17 5,831.91 - 7,476.25 Accounting Manager 17 5,831.91 - 7,476.25 City Clerk 16 5,248.20 - 6,728.20 Engineer 16 5,248.20 - 6,728.20 Senior Plans Examiner 16 5,248.20 - 6,728.20 Public Works Superintendent 16 5,248.20 - 6,728.20 Senior Administrative Analyst 16 5,248.20 - 6,728.20 Senior Planner 16 5,248.20 - 6,728.20 Associate Planner 15 4,724.02 - 6,055.80 CenterPlace Coordinator 15 4,724.02 - 6,055.80 Assistant Engineer 15 4,724.02 - 6,055.80 IT Specialist 15 4,724.02 - 6,055.80 Engineering Technician II 15 4,724.02 - 6,055.80 GIS/Database Administrator 15 4,724.02 - 6,055.80 Human Resource Analyst 14 4,251.88 - 5,450.64 Accountant/Budget Analyst 14 4,251.88 - 5,450.64 Administrative Analyst 14 4,251.88 - 5,450.64 Assistant Planner 14 4,251.88 - 5,450.64 Building Inspector II 14 4,251.88 - 5,450.64 Plans Examiner 14 4,251.88 - 5,450.64 Public Information Officer 14 4,251.88 - 5,450.64 Engineering Technician I 14 4,251.88 - 5,450.64 Senior Permit Specialist 14 4,251.88 - 5,450.64 Maintenance/Construction Inspector 13-14 3,826.38 - 5,450.64 Recreation Coordinator 13-14 3,826.38 - 5,450.64 Customer Relations/Facilities Coordinator 13 3,826.38 - 4,905.37 Code Enforcement Officer 13 3,826.38 - 4,905.37 Building Inspector I 13 3,826.38 - 4,905.37 Planning Technician 13 3,826.38 - 4,905.37 Deputy City Clerk 12-13 3,445.00 - 4,905.37 Senior Center Specialist 12-13 3,445.00 - 4,905.37 Human Resources Technician 12-13 3,445.00 - 4,905.37 Administrative Assistant 11-12 3,099.55 - 4,414.73 Permit Specialist 11-12 3,099.55 - 4,414.73 Accounting Technician 11-12 3,099.55 - 4,414.73 Maintenance Worker 11-12 3,099.55 - 4,414.73 Office Assistant II 10-11 2,789.41 - 3,973.46 Custodian 10 2,789.41 - 3,575.28 Office Assistant I 9-10 2,510.78 - 3,575.28 *The pay grades for positions not represented by the Union are 2.5%lower than reflected above as they were not increased by the 2.5%COLA on January 1,2011 89 10/18/11 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Glossary of Budget Terms Accrual Basis — A basis of accounting Capital Improvement — Expenditures in which revenues and expenditures are related to acquisition, expansion or recorded at the time they occur as rehabilitation of an element of the opposed to when cash is actually government's physical plant; sometimes received or spent. referred to as infrastructure. Appropriation — A legal authorization Capital Outlay— Fixed assets that have granted by the City Council to make general value of $5,000 or more and expenditures and to incur obligations for have a useful economic lifetime of more a specific purpose. than one year. Assessed Valuation — The valuation set Capital Project — Major construction, upon real estate and certain personal acquisition, or renovation activities property by the County Assessor as a which add value to government's basis for levying property taxes. physical assets or significantly increase their useful life, also called capital Authorized Positions — Employee improvements. positions, which are authorized in the adopted budget, to be filled during the Capital Projects Fund—A fund created year. to account for all resources and expenditures used for the acquisition of Bond — A long-term promise to repay a fixed assets except those financed by specified amount (the face amount of the enterprise funds. bond) on a particular date (the maturity date). The most common types of bonds Contingency — A budgetary reserve set are general obligation revenue bonds. aside for emergencies or unforeseen Bonds are primarily used to finance expenditures not otherwise budgeted. capital projects. Contractual Services — Services Budget—A plan of financial activity for rendered to a government by private a specified period of time (fiscal year or firms, individuals, or other governmental biennium) indicating all planned agencies. revenues and expenses for the budget period. Debt Service — Payment of interest and principal on borrowed money according Budget Message — The opening section to a predetermined payment schedule. of the budget that provides the City Council and the public with a general Department — The basic unit of service summary of the most important aspects responsibility, encompassing a broad of the budget, changes from the current mandate of related service and previous years, and the views and responsibilities. recommendations of the Mayor. 90 10/18/11 Division — Can be a subunit of a that define accepted accounting department which encompasses a principles. substantial portion of the duties assigned to a department (e.g. Building Division GASB — The Governmental Accounting in the Planning and Community Standards Board, established in 1985, is Development Department). the current standard-setting board for governmental GAAP. Encumbrance — The commitment of appropriated funds to purchase an item General Fund—The principal operating or service. To encumber funds means to fund of the City used for general set aside or commit funds for a specified governmental operations. Taxes and future expenditure. fees that generally have no restriction on their use support it. Expense — Charges incurred (whether paid immediately or unpaid) for General Obligation (G.O.) Bonds — operations, maintenance, interest or This type of bond is backed by the full other charges. faith, credit and taxing power of the government issuing it. Face Value — The amount of principal that must be paid at maturity for a bond Indirect Cost—A cost necessary for the issue. functioning of the organization as a whole, but which cannot be identified Fiscal Year — A twelve-month period with a specific product, function or designated as the operating year for activity. accounting and budgeting purposes in an organization. Infrastructure — The physical assets of a government (e.g. streets, water, sewer, Full-time Equivalent Position (FTE) — public buildings, and parks). A full-time or part-time position converted to the decimal equivalent of a Interfund Transfers — The movement full-time position based on 2,080 hours of monies between funds of the same per year. For example, a part-time governmental entity. person working 20 hours per week would be equivalent of 0.5 of a full-time Levy — To impose taxes for the support position. of the governmental activities. Fund—A fiscal entity with revenues and Long-term Debt— Debt with a maturity expenses that are segregated for the of more than one year after the date of purpose of carrying out a specific issuance. purpose or activity. Mission Statement—A broad statement GAAP — Generally Accepted of the intended accomplishment or basic Accounting Principles. Uniform purpose of a program. minimum standards for financial accounting and recording, encompassing Modified Accrual Accounting — A the conventions, rules, and procedures basis of accounting in which 91 10/18/11 expenditures are accrued but revenues Revenue — Sources of income financing are accounted for when they become the operations of government. measurable and available. Since this type of accounting basis is a Taxes—Compulsory charges levied by a conservative financial approach, it is government for the purpose of financing recommended as the standard for most services performed for the common governmental funds. benefit. This term does not include specific charges made against particular Operating Budget — The portion of the persons or property for current or budget that pertains to daily operations permanent benefits such as special that provide basic governmental assessments. Neither does the term services. include charges for services rendered only to those who pay, for example, Ordinance — A formal legislative sewer service charges. enactment by the City Council. If it is not in conflict with any higher form of Unreserved Fund Balance — The law, such as a statute or constitutional portion of a fund's balance that is not provision, it has the full force and effect restricted for a specific purpose and is of law within the boundaries of the available for general appropriation. municipality to which it applies. User Charges — The payment of a fee Program — The smallest organization for direct receipt of a public service by that delivers a specific set of services. A the party who benefits from the service. program may be an entire department; or if a department encompasses Vision Statement — A short statement significantly diverse responsibilities or that conveys the big picture of the large work forces, a single department organization. It is general in scope, not may be divided into two or more restricting. It answers the question programs. "Why?" Reserve — An account used to either set aside budgeted revenues that are not required for expenditure in the current budget year or to earmark revenues for a specific future purpose. Resolution — A special or temporary order of a legislative body—an order of a legislative body requiring less legal formality than an ordinance or statute. Resources — Total amounts available for appropriation including estimated revenues, fund transfers, and beginning balances. 92 10/18/11 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: November 1, 2011 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ® new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Second Reading Proposed Ordinance 11-018 BPA Electrical Transmission Facilities Renewal Franchise GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 35A.47.040 PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: None. BACKGROUND: Spokane County and the Bonneville Power Administration formed a franchise agreement on January 9, 1959 to "construct, operate and maintain one or more electric power transmission circuits with appurtenant fixture across, over and upon the right of way of the county road or roads." This agreement was for a period of 50 years expiring on January 9, 2009. The City inherited this franchise upon incorporation. Because the franchise is expired, the City needs to sign a new franchise agreement. Staff has been in negotiations with BPA to renew the franchise agreement. The new agreement is a franchise to: Install, locate, construct, maintain, repair, reconstruct, upgrade, operate, use, patrol, and, if necessary, remove electrical transmission facilities along with lines of poles or structures and appurtenances thereto, supporting conductors of one or more electric circuits of any voltage and any communication lines or equipment and appurtenances thereto ("Transmission System"), in, on, under, upon, over, along, across or through the roads, highways, streets, alleys, bridges, rights-of-way. This franchise agreement is different from franchises with private utilities because it is a franchise with the federal government. Typically in franchises with private utilities, the City requires insurance to limit the City's liability if damages are caused from the franchise. Local jurisdictions are precluded by federal law from requiring such provisions from the federal government in franchise agreements. The City published a copy of the franchise in the newspaper since the first reading as required by state law. Staff recommends approval of the proposed franchise. OPTIONS: Approve the Ordinance, with or without modifications. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: I move that we approve Ordinance 11-018 authorizing execution of an electrical transmission franchise with BPA. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: STAFF CONTACT: Cary Driskell — City Attorney; Kelly Konkright— Deputy City Attorney ATTACHMENTS: 1. Proposed franchise Ordinance with BPA 2. Expired franchise 3. Map showing general location of BPA facilities. DRAFT CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY SPOKANE COUNTY,WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 11-018 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON, GRANTING A NON-EXCLUSIVE FRANCHISE TO THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ACTING BY AND THROUGH THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, BONNEVILLE POWER ADMINISTRATION FOR A NONEXCLUSIVE FRANCHISE TO CONSTRUCT, MAINTAIN, AND OPERATE ELECTRICAL TRANSMISSION FACILITIES UPON, OVER, UNDER, ALONG, ACROSS, AND THROUGH CERTAIN CITY ROADS AND PUBLIC HIGHWAYS, OR PARTS THEREOF. WHEREAS, the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, acting by and through the United States Department of Energy, Bonneville Power Administration, has applied for a nonexclusive franchise, for a term of 25 years, to install, locate, construct, maintain, repair, reconstruct, upgrade, operate, use, patrol, and, if necessary, remove electrical transmission facilities consisting of lines of poles or structures and appurtenances thereto, supporting conductors of one or more electric circuits of any voltage and any communication lines or equipment and appurtenances thereto, in,on,under,upon, over, along,across and through the City roads,highways, streets, alleys, and bridges described in said application by reference to the sections, townships, and ranges in which said roads, highways, streets, alleys, and bridges are physically located within the City of Spokane Valley, State of Washington, including any additional areas annexed by the City of Spokane Valley during the time this franchise is valid, and except the areas covered by those easements acquired by Grantee prior to City of Spokane Valley ownership;and WHEREAS, RCW 80.32.010 authorizes cities to "grant authority for the construction, maintenance and operation of transmission lines for transmitting electric power, together with poles, wires and other appurtenances, upon, over, along and across any such public street or road, . . . and to prescribe the terms and conditions on which the transmission line and its appurtenances, shall be constructed, maintained and operated upon, over, along and across the road or street, and the grade or elevation at which the same shall be constructed,maintained and operated;"and WHEREAS, RCW 35A.47.040 authorizes code cities to grant franchises for use of public rights- of-way;and WHEREAS, it is in the public interest to grant a franchise to the United States of America, acting by and through the U.S. Department of Energy,Bonneville Power Administration. NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley, Spokane County, Washington,ordains as follows: Section 1. Grant of Franchise. The City of Spokane Valley hereby grants to the United States of America, acting by and through the U.S. Department of Energy, Bonneville Power Administration ("Grantee"), subject to all provisions, conditions, covenants and requirements of this agreement, the right, privilege and nonexclusive franchise ("Franchise"), to install, locate, construct, maintain, repair, reconstruct, upgrade, operate, use, patrol, and, if necessary, remove electrical transmission facilities along with lines of poles or structures and appurtenances thereto, supporting conductors of one or more electric circuits of any voltage and any communication lines or equipment and appurtenances thereto ("Transmission System"), in, on, under, upon, over, along, across or through the roads, highways, streets, alleys, bridges, rights-of-way, which lie within those legal subdivisions within the City of Spokane Valley ("City"), Washington, including any additional areas annexed by the City Ordinance 11-018,Franchise Agreement Bonneville Power Page 1 of 5 DRAFT during the time this franchise is valid, and except the areas covered by those easements acquired by Grantee prior to City ownership. Section 2. Costs. All costs of construction, repair, alteration, relocation or removal of any part of the Transmission System shall be paid by the Grantee. Grantee shall reimburse the City for all costs of one publication of this Franchise in a local newspaper, and required legal notices prior to any public hearing regarding this Franchise, contemporaneous with its acceptance of this Franchise. Grantee shall be subject to all permit and inspection fees associated with activities undertaken through the authority granted in this Franchise or under City Code. Grantee shall be subject to all permit and inspection fees associated with activities undertaken through the authority granted in this Franchise or under City Code. Section 3. Franchise not Exclusive. This Franchise shall not be deemed to be an exclusive Franchise. It shall in no manner prohibit City from granting other Franchises of a like and compatible nature or Franchises for public or private utilities under, along, across, over, and upon any of the City roads, rights-of-way, or other property subject to this Franchise and shall in no way restrict, prevent, or prohibit City from constructing, altering, maintaining, or using any of said roads or rights-of-way, drainage structures or facilities, irrigation structures or facilities, or any other City property or affect its jurisdiction over them or any part of them with full power to make all necessary construction, alterations, changes,relocations,repairs,or maintenance,which the City may deem necessary. Section 4. Map and Specifications to be Provided to the City. Prior to commencement of any new construction of any portion of the Transmission System, Grantee shall provide the City its plans and specifications to do such work. "New construction" means any new line of transmission line towers and conductors within Grantee's existing right-of-way or in new right-of-way. It would not include maintaining Grantee's existing lines or replacing (rebuild) of Grantee's conductors or poles in exactly the same locations, or the addition of a communication line to Grantee's existing towers and right of way, as required for the operation and maintenance of Grantee's facilities. Plans and specifications submitted to the City shall show the position, depth, or height, and location of all lines and facilities sought to be constructed, laid, installed or erected at that time, and shall show their relative position to existing City roads, rights-of-way, or other City property, upon plans drawn to scale indicating exact distance hereinafter collectively referred to as the "map of definite location." The Transmission System shall be constructed in exact conformity with said map of definite location, except in instances in which Grantee determines that a deviation may be necessary,and after approval by the City. Section 5. Construction Standards. All work shall be done in accordance with current standards and codes,in a thorough, professional and workmanlike manner with minimum interference to public use of the City rights-of-way. Grantee is responsible for the supervision, condition, and quality of the work done,whether it is by itself or by contractors,assigns or agencies. Section 6. All City Road Rights Reserved. City expressly reserves any and all rights which it now has or may hereafter acquire with respect to City roads,rights-of-ways,or other City property, and this Franchise shall not be construed to in any way limit or restrict any authority, power, rights, or privileges which City now has or may hereafter acquire to control and regulate the use of City roads, rights-of-way,and other City property covered by this Franchise. Section 7. City May Change and Improve Roads without Liability. If City shall at any time improve or change any City road or right-of-way subject to this Franchise by grading, regrading, surfacing, or paving the same, or by changing, altering, repairing, or relocating the grade thereof or by construction of drainage facilities, Grantee shall, upon written notice from the City, at Grantee's sole expense, with all reasonable speed, change the location or readjust the elevation of its Transmission System and other facilities so that the same shall not interfere with such City work and so such lines and Ordinance 11-018,Franchise Agreement Bonneville Power Page 2 of 5 DRAFT facilities shall conform to such new grades as may be established. City shall in no respect be held liable for any damages, costs, or expenses to Grantee that may occur by reason of any of the City's improvements, changes, or work above enumerated, except insofar as such damages, costs, or expenses shall be caused by negligence of the City's employees or agents. Section 8. Protection of Monuments. Grantee shall comply with applicable state laws relating to protection of monuments. Section 9. Vacation of City Roads—Alternative Route. If at any time City shall vacate any City road, right-of-way or other City property which is subject to rights granted by this Franchise, City shall grant an alternate route with the consultation of Grantee or reserve an easement for the benefit of Grantee, and by giving 60 days written notice to Grantee,terminate this Franchise with reference to such City road,right-of-way,or other City property so vacated. Section 10. Federal Tort Claims Act/Insurance. Grantee is an agency of the Federal government and is subject to the Federal Tort Claims Act, 62 Stat. 982,as amended,as may hereinafter be amended or superseded, and other applicable law. Pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act, Grantee agrees to be responsible for any loss or damage arising out of Grantee's activities under this Franchise. Contracting personnel are hired under federal contracting guidelines and are required to carry insurance. Section 11. Revocation for Non-Compliance. In the event that Grantee substantially violates or fails to comply with any of the material provisions of this Franchise, Grantee shall forfeit all rights conferred hereunder and this Franchise shall be revocable by the City at its discretion,provided,however, the City shall provide Grantee with written notice of its intention to revoke the Franchise, specifying the nature of such violation, failure, or neglect, and shall give Grantee a reasonable timeframe negotiated between the parties,not less than 90 days in which to cure such violation,failure,or neglect. Section 12. Grantee's Address. The address of Grantee is: Bonneville Power Administration 905 N.E. 11th Ave. P.O.Box 3621,Mail Stop TERS-3 Portland,OR 97208-3621 Any notification required to be given to Grantee may be given to the address above stated, provided that Grantee may from time to time notify City in writing of change of address to which notifications are to be sent. Section 13. Term. This nonexclusive Franchise agreement shall expire 25 years from the effective date. Section 14. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect five days after publication of the Ordinance, or a summary thereof, in the official newspaper of the City of Spokane Valley as provided by law,following passage by the City Council. Ordinance 11-018,Franchise Agreement Bonneville Power Page 3 of 5 DRAFT Adopted this day of ,2011 City of Spokane Valley Thomas E. Towey, Mayor ATTEST: Christine Bainbridge,City Clerk Approved as to Form: Date of Publication: Office of the City Attorney Effective Date: Ordinance 11-018,Franchise Agreement Bonneville Power Page 4 of 5 DRAFT Accepted by BPA Margareth H. Wolcott,Realty Officer The Grantee,BPA for itself,and for its successors and assigns,does accept all of the terms and conditions of the foregoing Franchise. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, has signed this day of ,2011. Subscribed and sworn before me this day of ,2011. Notary Public in and for the State of residing in My commission expires Ordinance 11-018,Franchise Agreement Bonneville Power Page 5 of 5 T A a, ' `- ' i+ G &W. +f +$ • BEFORE THE HONORABLE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF' $2010NE, COUNTY, WASHINGTON phi. 5947 • In the Matter of the Application of ) ) UNITED STATES OF Ai•ERICA } F R A N C H I S E for a franchise to construct, operate ) and maintain one or more electric power ) transmission circuits across, over and ) upon certain county roads or portions ) thereof in 40.40,11 County, ) ) Washington. ) ) The application of the United States of America, Department of the Interior, acting through the Bonneville rower Administrator, and its assigns, for a franchise to construct, operate and maintain one or more electric power transmission circuits with appurtenant fixtures across, over and upon the right of way of the county road or roads hereinafter described, having come regularly on for hearing on the °t11 day of 19 ,before the Board of County Commissioners of VoRalle County, Lashington, under the provisions of Section 6450-38 Remingtonts Revised Statutes of Washington, and it appearing to the Board of County Commissioners that public notice of said hearing was duly given as required by law, and that it is for the public interest to grant the franchise applied for, it is ORDERED, that a franchise be and the same hereby is granted to the United States of America and its assigns (hereinafter referred to as "the holder"), for a period of fifty years from the date of the entry of this order, to construct, operate and maintain one or more electric power transmission circuits, together with the necessary towers, poles and other fixtures appurtenant thereto, subject to the terms and conditions hereinafter enumerated, across, over, and upon the right of way of the following described county road or roads or portions 1 The centerline of the Bonneville Power Administration's transmission line crosses tracts; VT-102A - The centerline of Mission Avenue at BPA survey station 54+09.0 along the east tine of the Si a'Y3 of Section 14, Township 25 North, Range 44 Past, W.M., as shown on drawing, serial number 106191. VT-104A - The centerline of Broadway Street at BFA survey station 62+93 along the south line of the SL' E1; of Section 14, Township 25 North, Range 44 East, W.M., as shown on drawing, aerial number 106192. VT-106A - The centerline of Springfield Avenue at BPA survey station 66+20 near the east line of the NEkSEk of Section 14, Township 25 North, Range 44 East, W.M., as shown on drawing, serial number 106192. VT-112A - The centerline of Valley Way at BPA survey station 76+17 along the south line of the NE'r,SLk of Section 14, Township 25 North, Range 44 cast, :1.i•f., as shown on drawing, serial number 106192. VT-120A - The centerline of Sprague Avenue (former Primary State Highway No. 2) at BPA survey station 89+28.8 along the line common to Sections 14 and 23, Township 25 North, Range 44 as W.M., as shown on drawing, serial number 106192. VT-123A - The centerline of proposed Second Avenue at OPA survey station 98+55 near the east line of the NEi@?k of Section 23, Township 23 North, mange 44 East, W.M., as shown on drawing, serial number 106192. VT-125B - The centerline of Fourth Avenue at BPA survey station 102+75 along the south line of the NSWE•'.; of Section 23, Township 25 North, Range 44 East, W.Y•f., as shown on drawing, serial number 106192. VT-127A - The centerline of Eighth Avenue at BPA survey station 116+08 along the East-blast quarter section line of Section 23, Township 25 North, Range 44 East, W.M., as shown on drawing, serial number 106193. VT-130A - The centerline of Twelfth Avenue at BPA survey station 129+40 near the east line of the E1SEk of Section 23, Township 25 North, Range 44 East, W.M., as shown on drawing, serial number 106193. VT-132B - The centerline of Sixteenth Avenue at BPA survey station 142+69 along the line common to Sections 23 and 26, Township 25 North, Range 44 East, W.M., as shown on drawing, serial number 106193. VT-134A - The centerline of Twenty-Fourth Avenue at BPA survey station 18 436 along the East-West quarter section line of Section 26, Township 25 North, Range 44 East, W.M., as shown on drawing, serial number 106194. VT-138A - The centerline of Thirty-Second Avenue at BPA survey station 195+87 along the line common to Sections 26 and 35, Township 25 North, Range 44 last, N.M., as shown on drawing, serial number 106194. 1A, I. All construction, operation and maintenance of and repairs to said electric power transmission circuits and fixtures appurtenant thereto shall be performed in accordance with applicable state laws, ani the specifications, rules and regulations of the latest edition of and supplements to the National Electrical Safety Code, promulgated by the United States Bureau of Standards. Said electric power transmission circuits shall at all times be constructed, operated and maintained so as not to interfere unduly with the use of said county road or roads or endanger the safety of the traveling public thereon. 11. All costs of construction, repair, alteration, relocation or removal of said electric power transmission circuits and appurtenant fixtures shall be paid by the United States of America. 111. Whenever, by reason of the construction, repair, improvement, altera- tion or relocation of said county road or roads, or any portion thereof, it shall become necessary, in the opinion of the Hoard of County Commis- sioners, to remove or relocate any part or all of said electric power transmission circuits and appurtenant fixtures from said county road or roads, the holder agrees to remove or relocate said electric power transmission circuits and appurtenant fixtures imnndietely, and at its own expense within the limits of appropriations available therefor, to the place or places on said county road or roads designated by the Board of County Commissioners. ZV. In the event that all or any part of said county road or roads shall become a primary state higmway, and thereafter, by reason of the construc- tion, repair, improvement, alteration or relocation of all or any portion at said primary state highway as determined by the Director of Highways of the State of Washington, it shall become necessary, in the opinion of said Director of Highways, to remove or relocate any or all of said electric power transmission circuits and appurtenant fixtures from said highway, the holder agrees to remove or relocate said electric power transmission circuits and appurtenant fixtures immediately, and at its own expense within the limits of appropriations available therefor, to - 2 - the place or places on said state highway designated by said Director of highways, pursuant to Title 41, Chapter IX, Volume 7A, Remington's Revised Statutes of Washington. V. The work of constructing, removing and relocating all or any part of said electric power transmission circuits and fixtures appurtenant thereto shall, be performed by the holder in compliance with paragraph 1, and without unnecessary interference witn traffic upon or along said county road or roads. none of such work shall be undertaken or carried on without ten days' written notice having been first given to said Board of County Commissioners. v1. Any and all damage or injury done or caused to h© done to said county road or roads, or to any portion thereof, in the construction, operation or maintenance of said electric power transmission circuits shall be immediately repaired and reconstructed by the holder within the limits of appropriations available therefor and under the supervision and to the satisfaction of said Board of County Commissioners. Except where in the opinion of the Hoard of County Commissioners an emergency exists, notice in writing of such repairs or reconstruction required of the holder hereunder shall be given to the holder. Upon the failure and neglect or refusal of the holier to do and perform irrrnediately after receipt of such notice any repairs or reconstruction of said county road or roads herein required of the holder, or in an emergency without prior notice, the Board of County Commissioners may undertake and perform such repairs or reconstruction and the reasonable cost thereof including a reasonable sum for overhead will be paid by the holder within the limits of appropriations available therefor upon presentation of properly executed vouchers therefor; provided, however, that tf-e County shall submit an estimate of the cost of such repairs or reconstruction to the Bonneville Power Administrator, and shall obtain sand Administrator's anprovaL of the cost thereof before making any such repairs or reconstruction; except that if in an emergency, the existence of which shall be determined by the County, it becomes necessary for the County to make such repairs or reconstruction without giving such notice and obtaining the approval of the coat thereof by said Administrator, the United States shall not be required to make any payment therefor unless the sum expended, or any a3 - lesser reasonable wart, shall be approved by said Administrator, Whenever the Board of County Commissioners shall perform or cause to be performed any of the work conternplat in this paragraph the wages of every laborer and mechanic employed in the performance of said work shall be computed on a basic day rate of eight hours per day and work in excess of eight hours per day shall be permitted only upon the condition that every Such laborer and mechanic shall be compensated for all hours worked in excess of eight hours per day at not less than one and one-half times the basic rate of oay. For each violation of the requirements of this provision, a penalty of five dollars (Z.00) shall, be imposed upon the county for each laborer or mechanic for every calendar day in which such employees shall be required or permitted to labor more than eight hours upon said work without receiving compensation computed in accordance with this provision and all penalties thus imposed shall be ,withheld for the use and benefit of the holder; provided, further, that no person undergoing or serving a .sentence of imprisonment at hard labor shall be required or permitted to perform any of such work. VII. This franchise is granted pursuant to the provisions of section 645O-38, Remington's Revised Statutes of Washington. ❑III. The holder shall, within twenty days from receipt of a copy of this order, file with the Board of County Corcmissioners at Spnka re Washington, its written aceeptance of the terms and conditions of this franchise. Dater at Spna , Washington, this 9gk day of JaAuasy , 19$9 . BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON IstU. c. Allen Approved as to form; iqtaart J,, 8yde1f {gtc. n- Belle-p _ , Deputy Prosecuting Attorney for szprjeavo County, -Washington (spa.) (CO C ! S1ONEt$) (COURT ORAL 7- '9P07.03 E O Y ) ASIUGTON )_ _ 4 _ ,�N' w and;ana Ave 1 Oab A. slon Ave �®� Liberty I '��_'- ° A Lake ®Broadway Ave �� - ._ - B oadvzy Ave ®® i �I ® P44�e y to mmmr ji " ®®' She/tey rrAtoliA caxr ■ L'•A plewayBlvd ® �� ii �v�+ter b ighth Ave I • x ® Saltes a ®4'i Map 6.1 Utilities Legend City of Spokane Valley Boundary Urban Growth Area IlkWater Bodies Utilities AT&T Optic • Avista Sub Station • Avista Future Sub Station ♦ BPA Sub Station • NWP Meter Station ♦ IP&L Sub Station ♦ Sub Station A Cell Towers — — -Avista Future —Avista 115 KV —Avista 210 KV —BPA 115KV —BPA 230KV —BPA 500 KV —Vera 115K —CDALine -Pacific Gas Line Yellowstone Terminal Avista Gas Yellowstone PGT Gas Line Effective Date:5/10/2006 Ordinance No.:06-010 jam. 0 0.5 Map Location 2 Miles Notice:The information shown on this map is compiled from various sources and is subject to constant revision.The City makes no claims or gurantees about the accuracy or currency of this map and expressly disclaims liability for errors and omissions in its contents. To confirm accuracy contact the City of Spokane Palley,Community Development Department,Division of Planning,(509)921-1000. Product of the city of Spokane Valley,community Development Department CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: November 15, 2011 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ® new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: First Reading Proposed Ordinance # 11-019 Amending the 2011 Budget. GOVERNING LEGISLATION: State budget law. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: To date the Council has heard presentations on the 2011 Budget Amendment on two previous occasions including a Public Hearing held on October 25, 2011. Thus far no formal Council action has been taken. BACKGROUND: The City's 2011 Budget development process began in the early summer of 2010 and was ultimately adopted via Ordinance #10-022 on October 12, 2010 (13 months ago). At the time the budget was prepared it was done so with the best information we had available at the time but at this point we have the benefit of hindsight. The proposed 2011 Budget amendment presented in Ordinance # 11-019 amends the budget as adopted with Ordinance #10-022 and reflects those changes that have occurred through the normal course of operations, and affects a number of funds. Revenues are amended upward a total of $2,812,681 across 7 funds and expenditures are amended upward $2,901,929 across 9 funds. Revenue Expenditure Fund Fund Increase Increase No. Name (Decrease) (Decrease) 001 General Fund 355,000 730,681 101 Street O&M 698,000 1,443,300 102 Arterial Street 0 58,019 302 Special Capital Projects 0 180,000 307 Capital Grants 150,000 150,129 308 Barker Bridge 150,000 150,000 309 Parks Capital Projects 0 (220,000) 311 Street Capital Improvements 2011+ 584,681 (500,000) 402 Stormwater 375,000 909,800 403 Aquifer Protection Area 500,000 0 2,812,681 2,901,929 OPTIONS: Options are to accept the proposed amendments in whole or in-part. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to advance Ordinance #11-019 amending Ordinance #10-022 which adopted the 2011 Budget, to a second reading. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: This action amends the estimated revenues and appropriations initially adopted for the 2011 Budget. In the case of increases in appropriations, there are adequate funds available to pay for these amendments. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Calhoun ATTACHMENTS: -Fund level line-item detail of revenues and expenditures. -Ordinance #11-019 P:IClerklAgendaPackets for Weblagendapacket 11-15-1111tem 4 RCA 1st Read Ord 11-019 amending 2011 Budg.docx P:IClerk\AgendaPackets for Weblagendapacket 11-15-111Ordinance 11-019 amend detail 2011 11 15 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 11/7/2011 2011 Budget Amendment Ordinance#11-019 Budget Amendment Requests AReq t d Account"Description Justification. . .; Amendment #401 General Fund Expenditures •Interfund transfers out-#311 40%of fund balance greater than $26mm 584,681 Capital outlay Purchase building permit software 146,000 •T.:otal expenditures, ~" 7"3Q,681 Revenues Gambling tax revised estimate 175,000 Franchise fee 1 Business Registrations revised estimate 150,000 State shared revenues revised estimate 30,000 Total revenues 355,000; X7.01 Street O&M Fu"nd Expenditures Interfund transfers out-#402 Pay for 1/2 of Shop facility with Storm 375,000 Capital outlay Snow plow acquisition 200,000 Capital outlay Grant financed projects 868,300 Total expenditures 1,443,300 Revenues EECB Grant Grant financed projects 443,000 CDB Grant Grant financed projects 88,800 Interfund transfers in -#402 Grant financed projects 159,800 Miscellaneous Avista Rebate on LED Replace Proj 6,400 ........ ..... . .. .... Total revenues . 698,QQ0 l#102 Arterial Street Fund" Expenditures Interfund transfers out/Street O&M Close-out fund balance 58,019 iTotal expenditures 58,019 I#302 Special Capital.Projects Fund j Expenditures Interfund transfers out-#307 Proj. #088 Broadway- Moore to Flora 30,000 Interfund transfers out-#308 Barker Bridge 150,000 • Total expenditures 1$0,000,= Page 1 of 3 P:1Clerk\AgendaPackets for Weblagendapacket 11-15-111Ordinance 11-019 amend detail 2011 11 15 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 11/7/2011 2011 Budget Amendment Ordinance#11-019 Budget Amendment Requests R equested Account.Description Justification Amendment #307 Capital--Grants'i+und I Expenditures Capital outlay Proj. #088 Broadway-Moore to Flora 150,000 Miscellaneous close out fund 129 Total expenditures 150,129;1 Revenues Grant proceeds Proj. #088 Broadway-Moore to Flora 120,000 lnterfund transfers in -#302 Proj. #088 Broadway-Moore to Flora 30,000 Total revenues 150,000 3 F#308-Barker Bridge-Fund 1 Expenditures Capital outlay Needed to complete project 150,000 Total expen itures 150,000 Revenues lnterfund transfers in -#302 Needed to complete project 150,000 Total revenues, 15.0,000 #309-Parks Capital Projects s.Fu nd; Expenditures Capital outlay $320k contingency not necessary (220,000) [Total expenditures (220,000)1 I#311 Street Capital•Improvements 2011+. 1 Expenditures Capital outlay Reappropriate to 2012 (500,000) Total expenditures ' - (500,000)1. Revenues lnterfund transfers in-#001 40% of fund balance greater than $26mm 584,681 ITotal revenues .584,681: Page 2 of 3 P:1ClerklAgendaPackets for Weblagendapacket 11-15-111Ordinance 11-019 amend detail 2011 11 15 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 11/7/2011 2011 Budget Amendment Ordinance#11-019 Budget Amendment Requests Account. = Requested Descrlptian. Justification Amendment' #402 -Stormwater Fund 1 Expenditures Capital outlay Acquire and set-up shop facility 750,000 Interfund transfesr out-#101 Broadway Ave. resurfacing-sw element 159,800 ;Tfltal exenitures 909,800 Revenues Interfund transfers in -#101 Pay for 1/2 of Shop facility from Street om 375,000 Total revehue5 ' . 375,flfl0 J#403 .`Aquifer-Protection Area Revenues APA Fee collected by Spokane County 500,000 Total avenues. 50U,000 jotais Across.all Funds Total revenues 2,812,681 Total expenditures 2,901,929 Page 3 of 3 DRAFT CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY SPOKANE COUNTY,WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 11-019 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON, AMENDING ORDINANCE 10-022 ENTITLED "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,SPOKANE COUNTY,WASHINGTON,ADOPTING A BUDGET FOR THE PERIOD JANUARY 1, 2011 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2011 APPROPRIATING FUNDS AND ESTABLISHING SALARY SCHEDULES FOR ESTABLISHED POSITIONS", AND OTHER MATTERS RELATED THERETO. WHEREAS,the City Council passed Ordinance 10-022 on October 12, 2010,which adopted the 2011 annual budget; and WHEREAS, subsequent to the adoption of the 2011 annual budget, it has become necessary to make changes by adding new revenue appropriations, amendments, and transferring funds in order to properly perform City functions, services and activities;and WHEREAS, the budget changes set forth in this Ordinance could not have been reasonably anticipated or known when the 2011 annual budget was passed by the City Council; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the best interests of the City are served by amending the 2011 budget to reflect unanticipated revenue, expenditures, transfers and appropriating same as set forth herein. NOW THEREFORE,the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley, Washington do ordain as follows: Section 1. Amended Revenues and Appropriations. Ordinance No. 10-022 adopted a budget for the twelve months beginning January 1, 2011 and ending December 31, 2011. Each item, revenue, appropriation, and fund contained in Section 1 and 2 of Ordinance 10-022 is hereby amended as set forth in Attachment A,which is fully incorporated herein. Section 2. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence,clause or phrase of this Ordinance. Section 3. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect five (5) days after publication of this Ordinance or a summary thereof in the official newspaper of the City as provided by law. Passed by the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley this day of December,2011. ATTEST: Thomas E. Towey,Mayor Christine Bainbridge,City Clerk Approved as to form: Office of the City Attorney Date of Publication: Effective Date: Ordinance 11-019 Amending 2011 Budget Page 1 of 2 205,129 55,000 150,000 Ordinance 11-019 Amending 2011 Budget CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 2011 Budget Amendment Ordinance Ordinance No.11-019 Fund No. 001 101 Street O&M Fund IL Title 1 General B e ginning Fund Balance Sources Uses Revenues Line-Item Adopted via Ord.10-022 27,461,703 36,472,125 102 Arterial Street Fund 103 Paths&Trails 105HotellMotel Tax 120 CenterPlace Operating Reserve 121 Service Level Stabilization 122 Winter Weather Reserve 123 City Facilities Repair&Replacement 204 301 302 303 304 307 308 309 310 311 402 403 501 502 Debt Service LTGO 03 Capital Projects Special Capital Projects Street Capital Projects Mirabeau Projects Capital Grants Barker Bridge Reconstruction Parks Capital Projects Civic Facilities Capital Projects Street Capital Improvement 2011+ Stormwater Management Aquifer Protection Area Equipment Rental&Replacement Risk Management Total of all Funds Amendment Total Revenue s Total Sources_ 11/7/2011 Line-Item Adopted via Ord.10-022 355,000 36,827,125 64,288,828 36,925,086 Appropriations Amendment 3,076,201 4,887,000 698,000 5,585,000 8,661,201 58,019 48,186 272,356 350,231 5,423,795 501,168 0 8,000 0 0 481,000 0 3,000 0 54,000 0 5,000 0 1,608,259 419,000 0 792,875 2,333,084 73,456 44,302 129 0 0 8,000 481,000 3,000 54,000 5,000 5,383,327 58,019 56,186 0 20,000 753,356 500,000 353,231 0 5,477,795 506,168 0 505,000 0 419,000 2,027,259 685,000 0 415,000 0 415,000 0 8,437,307 0 685,000 415,000 415,000 8,437,307 685,000 685,000 1,207,875 1,013,598 2,748,084 1,021,069 8,510,763 8,437,037 0 0 44,302 55,000 150,000 0 150,000 205,000 150,000 1,249,365 613,000 0 613,000 4,899,745 0 2,288,845 0 40,000 500,000 0 584,681 1,732,000 375,000 0 500,000 40,000 1,084,681 2,107,000 500,000 0 1,862,365 1,959,036 4,939,745 2,000,000 1,084,681 500,000 4,395,845 2,249,645 500,000 0 906,379 9,000 0 9,000 915,379 20,420 319,000 0 319,000 339,420 209,000 319,000 Total Appropriations Estimate d Ending Fund Balance 730,681 37,655,767 26,633,061 1,443,300 6,826,627 1,834,574 58,019 0 0 0 0 0 58,019 20,000 0 36,186 500,000 0 253,356 353,231 0 505,000 5,477,795 1,168 0 0 685,000 1,013,598 0 0 180,000 0 0 150,129 150,000 2,027,259 0 194,277 1,201,069 8,437,307 1,547,015 73,456 44,302 205,129 0 150,000 0 (220,000) 1,739,036 0 (500,000) 909,800 0 123,329 2,000,000 0 2,939,745 1,084,681 3,159,445 0 1,236,400 500,000 0 209,000 0 319,000 706,379 20,420 51,408,518 55,549,432 2,812,681 58,362,113 109,770,631 61,781,798 2,901,929 64,683,997 45,086,634 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: Nov 15th, 2011 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: [' consent ❑ old business ® new business [' public hearing [' information ❑ admin. report [' pending legislation [' executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Proposed Resolution 11-009 Amending Speed Limits GOVERNING LEGISLATION: N/A PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Resolution to change the speed limit was not passed on 7/26/11. Discussion on 10/18/11. BACKGROUND: A resolution to change the Indiana Ave. speed limit from 25 to 35 mph was put before Council on 7/26/11. The resolution did not pass. At Council request, staff is bringing the resolution back for action. Staff has collected additional speed data on the corridor since the 10/18/11 meeting. The results are shown below. Based on the results of these studies staff is still recommending a posted speed limit of 35 mph. Location Date 85'4/o-tile speed Indiana Avenue w/o Desmet 10/10 - 10/12 40 mph Mission Parkway (WB) 10/24— 10/27 36 mph Indiana Parkway (EB) 10/24— 10/27 38 mph The speed study for Mission Avenue from Flora to Barker, while not part of this resolution, is attached for Council information as well. OPTIONS: 1) Approve the recommendation from Public Works for speed limit change; or 2) Deny the recommendation for the speed limit change; or (3) take other action deemed appropriate. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to approve resolution 11-009 which changes the speed limit of Indiana Avenue from Sullivan Road to Flora Road to 35 mph, and establishes a 35 mph speed limit on Indiana Parkway and Mission Parkway. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Speed limit signing will need to be changed. This will be completed under the county maintenance contract. STAFF CONTACT: Neil Kersten, Public Works Director; Inga Note, Senior Traffic Engineer ATTACHMENTS: 1. RCA from 7/26/11 2. Draft Resolution 11-009 3. Draft Master Speed Limit Schedule 4. 4 Speed studies CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: July 26"', 2011 Department Director Approval: Ej Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ® new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Proposed Resolution 11-006: Indiana Avenue Extension Speed Limit GOVERNING LEGISLATION: NJA PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Discussion on 7/19/11 BACKGROUND: Spokane Valley adopted the speed limits established by Spokane County upon incorporation. This RCA seeks to address the adopted speed limit of Indiana Avenue and its extension (Mission Parkway and Indiana Parkway) from Sullivan Road to Flora Road. The MUTCD states that "States and local agencies should conduct engineering studies to reevaluate non-statutory speed limits on segments of their roadways that have undergone significant changes since the last review, such as the addition or elimination of parking or driveways, changes in the number of travel lanes, changes in the configuration of bicycle lanes, changes in traffic control signal coordination, or significant changes in traffic volumes." (MUTCD, 2B-13) This is the case of Indiana Avenue, which is currently being extended from approximately 0.75 miles east of Sullivan Road to where it transitions at Flora Road into Mission Avenue. The Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) also states that when a speed limit within a speed zone is posted, it should be within 5 mph of the 85"' percentile speed* of free- flowing traffic." (MUTCD, 2B-13) Currently, Indiana Avenue does not meet this condition. A speed study was conducted on Indiana east of Sullivan and the 8511 percentile speeds are 35.3 mph for eastbound drivers and 34.5 mph for westbound drivers. Additionally, Indiana west of Sullivan Road is posted at 35 mph, and Mission Avenue east of Flora is posted at 35 mph. Because drivers are travelling at 35 mph approaching this segment of Indiana, it is recommended that the segment be posted at 35 mph to create continuity and to prevent driver confusion. Furthermore, Public Works engineers have designed the Indiana Extension (Mission Parkway and Indiana Parkway) to have a posted speed limit of 35 mph. Consequently, all vertical and horizontal curves of the roadway meet the minimum requirements of the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) for 35 mph. The 8S'"Percentile Speed is the speed at or below which 85 percent of the motor vehicles travel. Speeds are measured with traffic tube counters during typical driving conditions:the speeds measured are free-flow speeds.The 85"percentile speed is derived from these counts. Table 1. Modification to Arterial Speed Limit _ Speed Limit Comments Road Segment 85% Speed Adopted Posted from Study Recommended Indiana Sullivan Road to 35.3 mph Avenue Flora Road 25 mph 25 mph 34.5 mph 35 mph Minor Arterial Figure 1. Indiana Avenue from Sullivan Road to Flora Road ) -.• - ,t r- a' WI i . .Ll�I L. �'li Fti -•. V_�IikOf!,$w'8:1-`.'t - ---,_ ,■ J . rr F r 1,,� — — Residence a.4� Inrw;Spokz�ne �� a 7 P. { a$1 Valfey`�� _ 1 _ i• r i � na - _:� tae -ate_ 0 .41111110‘49 -1,:7-7"------', 1E. ' .' " • ICISPF . mi. ;. 1 ,. CV'4""•••zseia _ s J • . 4. - M� P7 Figure 2. Indiana Avenue Extension it {1 maim „,/ -7 A" - i`r 11h9111M: l2P— � ' p minurn=i"- 31r. OPTIONS! 1) Approve the recommendation from Public Works for speed limit change. 2) Request additional analysis of speed limit by Public Works. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: I move to approve Resolution 11-006, which changes the speed limit of Indiana Avenue from Sullivan Road to Flora Road to 35 mph, and establishes a 35 mph speed limit on Indiana Parkway and Mission Parkway. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Speed limit signing will need to be changed. This will be completed under the county maintenance contract. STAFF CONTACT: Neil Kersten, Public Works Director; Inga Note, Senior Traffic Engineer ATTACHMENTS: 1. Draft Resolution 11-006 2. Draft Master Speed Limit Schedule DRAFT CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY SPOKANE COUNTY,WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. 11-009 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON, REVISING AN ARTERIAL SPEED LIMIT PURSUANT TO SPOKANE VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 9.05.030; AND OTHER MATTERS RELATED THERETO. WHEREAS, the City Council from time to time may modify arterial speed limits to better reflect changing traffic conditions and roadway characteristics;and WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Spokane Valley Municipal Code Section 9.05.030, which, in part,provides that the maximum speed limits for streets can be established by ordinance or resolution; and WHEREAS, the City Council has authority under SVMC 9.05.030 to change speed limits, provided that such alteration shall be made on the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation, be reasonable and safe,and in the interest of the health, safety and welfare of the citizens of this City;and WHEREAS,these changes will be listed in the Master Speed Limit Code adopted by the City. NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley, Spokane County,Washington,as follows: Section 1. Establishing an Arterial Speed Limit: The speed limit on the following City road sections shall be established at 35 mph: • Indiana Avenue from Sullivan Road to Indiana Parkway. • Indiana Parkway from Indiana Avenue to Flora Road. • Mission Parkway from Indiana Parkway to Flora Road. Section 2. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence or clause of this Resolution is for any reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining provisions of this Resolution. Section 3. Effective Date. This Resolution shall be effective upon adoption. Adopted this 15th day of November,2011. City of Spokane Valley ATTEST: Mayor Thomas E. Towey City Clerk,Christine Bainbridge Approved as to Form: Office of the City Attorney Resolution 11-009 Establishing an arterial speed limit Page 1 of 1 MASTER SPEED LIMIT SCHEDULE Speed Limit Schedule Page No. Schedule A: School Speed Zones 2 Schedule B: Playground Speed Zones 4 Schedule C: Speed Limits 5 Master Speed Limit Schedule 7/26/11 Page 1 of 6 MASTER SPEED LIMIT SCHEDULE Schedule A— School Speed Zones SCHOOL SPEED ZONES The following road sections have been designated as school zones. The maximum speed allowable on the said road sections shall be twenty miles per hour as designated with any of the signage options pursuant to Washington Administrative Code section 392-151-035 as adopted or amended. The Council shall establish any changes to speed limits or school speed zones by resolution. TWENTY MILES PER HOUR: 4th AVENUE from six hundred (600) feet west of Adams Road to three hundred (300) feet east of Adams Road; from three hundred (300) feet west of Bradley Street to three hundred (300) feet east of Coleman Street; and from three hundred(300) feet west of Long Road to Moen Street. 8th AVENUE from three hundred (300) feet west of Adams Road to eight hundred (800) feet east of Adams Road. 9th AVENUE from Herald Road to Felts Road. 10th AVENUE from Wilbur Road to Union Road. 12th AVENUE from Wilbur Road to Union Road. 16th AVENUE from three hundred (300) feet west of University Road to three hundred (300) feet east of Glenn Road; from Woodlawn Road to Clinton Road; and from three hundred (300) feet east of Bolivar Road to two hundred (200) feet west of Warren Road. 24th AVENUE from Union Road to Pines Road and from three hundred (300) feet west of Calvin Road to two hundred(200) feet east of Adams Road. 32nd AVENUE from three hundred (300) feet west of Pines Road to Woodlawn Road. ADAMS ROAD from 9th Avenue to three hundred fifty (350) feet north of 4th Avenue and from eight hundred fifty (850) feet north of 24th Avenue to 24th Avenue. ALKI AVENUE from Glenn Road to Pierce Road and from four hundred (400) feet west of Pines Road to Pines Road. BARKER ROAD from seven hundred fifty (750) feet south of Mission Avenue to three hundred (300) feet north of Mission Avenue. BOWDISH ROAD from 20th Avenue to 24th Avenue and from three hundred (300) feet south of 11th Avenue to three hundred (300) feet north of 11th Avenue. BRADLEY ROAD from 5th Avenue to 3rd Avenue. BROADWAY AVENUE from four hundred (400) feet west of Farr Road to four hundred (400) feet east of Farr Road; from one hundred (100) feet west of VanMarter Road to Johnson Road; from three hundred (300) feet west of Progress Road to St. Charles Road; from four hundred (400) feet east of McDonald Road to Blake Road; from three hundred (300) feet west of Felts Road to three hundred (300) feet east of Felts Road; and from three hundred (300) feet west of Ella Road to three hundred (300) feet east of Ella Road. BUCKEYE AVENUE from two hundred (200) feet east of Park Road to three hundred fifty (350) feet east of Center Road. CENTER ROAD from Marietta Avenue to Utah Avenue. Master Speed Limit Schedule 7/26/11 Page 2 of 6 CIMMARON DRIVE from Sunderland Drive to three hundred (300) feet east of Woodruff Road. COLEMAN ROAD from 5th Avenue to 3rd Avenue. FARR ROAD from three hundred (300) feet south of Valleyway Avenue to three hundred fifty (350) feet north of Valleyway Avenue. FLORA ROAD from six hundred(600) feet south of Wellesley to Wellesley Avenue. HERALD ROAD from 11th Avenue to 9th Avenue. LONG ROAD from three hundred (300) feet south of 4th Avenue to 2nd Avenue. MCDONALD ROAD from Broadway Avenue to Cataldo Avenue; from three hundred fifty (350) feet south of 16th Avenue to 14th Avenue; and from 7th Avenue to 5th Avenue. MISSION AVENUE from five hundred (500) feet west of Bowman Road to Park Road; from SR-27 to seven hundred fifty (750) feet east of SR-27; and from Barker Road to five hundred (500) feet east of Barker Road. PARK ROAD from three hundred (300) feet south of Mission Avenue to Nora Avenue and from one hundred (100) feet south of Carlisle Avenue to four hundred (400) feet north of Buckeye Avenue. PINES ROAD from 25th Avenue to 23rd Avenue, from 40th Avenue to five hundred (500) north of 32nd Avenue, and from 18th Avenue to 20th Avenue. PROGRESS ROAD from six hundred fifty (650) feet south of Broadway Avenue to Broadway Avenue and from Wellesley Avenue to Crown Avenue. SCHAFER ROAD from three hundred (300) feet south of Cimmaron Drive to three hundred (300) feet north of Cimmaron Drive. SR-27 from two hundred (200) feet south of Mirabeau Parkway to one hundred (100) feet north of Pinecroft Way and from three hundred (300) feet north of Broadway Avenue to three hundred (300) feet south of Broadway Avenue. UNION ROAD from 12th Avenue to 10th Avenue. UNIVERSITY ROAD from 19th Avenue to 16th Avenue. VALLEYWAY AVENUE from three hundred (300) feet west of Marguerite Road to one hundred fifty (150) feet east of Hutchinson Street. VISTA ROAD from Frederick Avenue to two hundred(200) feet south of Buckeye Avenue. WELLESLEY AVENUE from seven hundred (700) feet west of Adams Road to two hundred (200) feet east of Burns Road and from Conklin Road to Flora Road. WILBUR ROAD from 12th Avenue to 10th Avenue. WOODRUFF ROAD from three hundred (300) feet south of Cimmaron Drive to three hundred (300) feet north of Cimmaron Drive. Master Speed Limit Schedule 7/26/11 Page 3 of 6 MASTER SPEED LIMIT SCHEDULE Schedule B—Playground Speed Zones PLAYGROUND SPEED ZONES The following road sections have been designated as playground zones. The maximum speed allowable on said road sections shall be as shown below when signs are in place. TWENTY MILES PER HOUR: MISSION AVENUE from two hundred fifty (250) feet west of Bowdish Road to one thousand five hundred (1,500) feet west of Bowdish Road. TWENTY-FIVE MILES PER HOUR: MIRABEAU PARKWAY from one thousand(1,000) feet east of Pinecroft Way to one thousand three hundred (1,300) feet north of Mansfield Avenue. Master Speed Limit Schedule 7/26/11 Page 4 of 6 MASTER SPEED LIMIT SCHEDULE Schedule C—Speed Limits The following road sections have maximum speed limits higher than 25 miles per hour. THIRTY MILES PER HOUR: 3rd AVENUE from west city limits to Fancher Road. MISSION AVENUE from Pines Road to Sullivan Road. MONTGOMERY DRIVE from Argonne Road to Dartmouth Lane. THIRTY-FIVE MILES PER HOUR: 1st AVENUE from Eastern Road to Thierman Road. 4th AVENUE from west city limits to Eastern Road. 8th AVENUE from west city limits to Park Road; from Dishman-Mica Road to University Road; from Pines Road to Sullivan Road; and from Barker Road to Hodges Road. 16th AVENUE from Dishman-Mica Road to Sullivan Road. 32"d AVENUE from Dishman-Mica Road to Best Road. 44th AVENUE from Locust Road to Sands Road. APPLEWAY AVENUE from Sprague Avenue to east city limits. APPLEWAY BOULEVARD from Thierman Road to University Road. ARGONNE ROAD from Dishman-Mica Road to SR-290. BARKER ROAD from south city limits to four hundred twenty (420) feet north of Bridgeport Avenue. BLAKE ROAD from SR-27 to Saltese Road. BOWDISH ROAD from Sands Road to Mission Avenue. BROADWAY AVENUE from Havana Street to Flora Road. CARNAHAN ROAD from south city limits to 8th Avenue. DISHMAN ROAD from 8th Avenue to Appleway Avenue. DISHMAN-MICA ROAD from three hundred (300) feet south of 8th Avenue to Sprague Avenue. EUCLID AVENUE from Sullivan Road to Flora Road; from Flora Road to Barker Road; and from Barker Road to east city limits. EVERGREEN ROAD from 32nd Avenue to Indiana Avenue and from SR-290 to Forker Road. FANCHER ROAD from the Freeway (PSH No. 2) access on 3rd Avenue to SR-290. FLORA ROAD from Sprague Avenue to Montgomery Avenue and from the north side of the Spokane River to Wellesley Avenue. INDIANA AVENUE from SR-27 to Indiana Parkway. Master Speed Limit Schedule 7/26/11 Page 5 of 6 INDIANA PARKWAY from Indiana Avenue to Flora Road. MADISON ROAD from Thorpe Road to Pines Road. MANSFIELD AVENUE from Montgomery Avenue to Pines Road. MARIETTA AVENUE from Sullivan Road to Euclid Avenue. McDONALD ROAD from 16th Avenue to Mission Avenue. MIRABEAU PARKWAY from SR-27 to Indiana Avenue. MISSION AVENUE from Argonne Road to SR-27 and from Flora Road to east city limits. MISSION PARKWAY from Indiana Parkway to Flora Road. MONTGOMERY DRIVE from Dartmouth Lane to SR-27. MULLAN ROAD from Appleway Avenue to Indiana Avenue. PARK ROAD from Beverly Drive to Bridgeport Avenue. PINES ROAD from Madison Road to 16th Avenue. PROGRESS ROAD from Wellesley Avenue to Crown Avenue. RUTTER AVENUE from west city limits to Park Road. SALTESE ROAD from 16th Avenue to Blake Road. SANDS ROAD from 44th Avenue to Bowdish Road. SCHAFER ROAD from 44th Avenue to Dishman-Mica Road. SPRAGUE AVENUE from west city limits to east city limits. SR-27 from SR-290 to five hundred (500) feet south of 16th Avenue. SULLIVAN ROAD from Saltese Road to Wellesley Avenue. THORPE ROAD from Dishman-Mica Road to Madison Road. UNIVERSITY ROAD from Dishman-Mica Road to Mission Avenue. WELLESLEY AVENUE from McDonald Road to Flora Road. FORTY MILES PER HOUR: BARKER ROAD from Euclid Avenue to SR-290. SR-290 from west city limits to twelve hundred (1,200) feet west of University Road. FORTY-FIVE MILES PER HOUR: DISHMAN-MICA ROAD from south city limits to three hundred(300) feet south of 8th Avenue. SR-27 from five hundred(500) feet south of 16th Avenue to south city limits. FIFTY MILES PER HOUR: SR-290 from twelve hundred(1,200) feet west of University Road to east city limits. Master Speed Limit Schedule 7/26/11 Page 6 of 6 1-90 Westbound Offramp at Desmet Eastbound,Westbound J-U-B Engineers, Inc. 422 W. Riverside, Suite 304 Spokane,WA 99201 (509)458-3727 Page 1 Site Code: Station ID: Indiana 1-90 Westbound Offramp at Desmet Latitude:0'0.000 Undefined Start 1 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 Pace Number Time 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 999 Total Speed in Pace 10/10/11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 07:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 08:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 09:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 * 11:00 12 2 9 7 15 14 20 34 28 23 10 18 5 9 206 29-38 119 12 PM 8 0 4 17 21 22 28 40 34 20 18 9 3 5 229 27-36 145 13:00 13 0 3 6 16 23 24 15 26 31 23 7 3 4 194 30-39 120 14:00 6 2 0 12 17 10 25 32 26 21 22 16 10 4 203 31-40 126 15:00 17 0 11 5 11 13 37 31 40 29 13 11 5 11 234 30-39 151 16:00 22 4 9 16 28 31 34 28 41 32 23 6 10 3 287 29-38 166 17:00 32 7 12 19 28 39 57 53 44 50 34 13 6 5 399 29-38 243 18:00 14 4 2 7 11 21 25 34 52 26 20 13 2 4 235 29-38 158 19:00 8 0 0 2 11 8 23 22 22 15 5 3 7 2 128 29-38 90 20:00 5 0 0 5 11 9 21 20 16 16 11 8 4 2 128 30-39 84 21:00 6 0 0 0 6 5 9 9 14 9 8 3 3 6 78 31-40 49 22:00 1 0 3 2 2 3 8 2 1 6 3 3 2 2 38 29-38 20 23:00 0 0 2 0 2 2 2 3 5 2 2 2 1 0 23 27-36 14 Total 144 19 55 98 179 200 313 323 349 280 192 112 61 57 2382 Percent 6.0% 0.8% 2.3% 4.1% 7.5% 8.4% 13.1% 13.6% 14.7% 11.8% 8.1% 4.7% 2.6% 2.4% AM Peak 11:00 11:00 11:00 11:00 11:00 11:00 11:00 11:00 11:00 11:00 11:00 11:00 11:00 11:00 11:00 Vol. 12 2 9 7 15 14 20 34 28 23 10 18 5 9 206 PM Peak 17:00 17:00 17:00 17:00 16:00 17:00 17:00 17:00 18:00 17:00 17:00 14:00 14:00 15:00 17:00 Vol. 32 7 12 19 28 39 57 53 52 50 34 16 10 11 399 1-90 Westbound Offramp at Desmet Eastbound,Westbound Start 1 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 Pace Number Time 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 999 Total Speed in Pace 10/11/11 3 0 1 0 6 1 3 8 1 4 3 0 0 0 30 27-36 19 01:00 1 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 5 3 1 2 1 0 17 34-43 12 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 1 2 4 2 3 0 0 16 32-41 12 03:00 3 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 0 13 29-38 6 04:00 1 0 0 0 0 2 2 2 0 6 3 1 0 3 20 30-39 13 05:00 3 0 0 1 5 4 2 3 8 7 3 1 1 4 42 29-38 24 06:00 2 0 3 0 7 14 11 10 17 11 11 9 5 3 103 29-38 63 07:00 3 0 6 12 25 28 32 32 28 27 20 16 6 12 247 28-37 147 08:00 9 0 7 10 15 10 22 23 13 25 17 21 5 14 191 31-40 100 09:00 15 4 0 3 7 18 9 24 19 16 15 4 4 2 140 29-38 86 10:00 5 0 2 10 16 14 24 18 28 13 17 7 6 4 164 27-36 100 11:00 11 4 2 6 9 19 25 28 19 28 14 8 3 4 180 29-38 119 12 PM 17 1 6 14 15 15 32 29 35 27 23 9 7 5 235 31-40 146 13:00 9 0 5 16 14 13 28 30 45 26 8 16 6 5 221 29-38 142 14:00 7 2 1 5 16 15 27 36 40 19 21 11 3 5 208 31-40 143 15:00 17 0 2 4 10 10 37 32 45 32 25 16 5 3 238 31-40 171 16:00 18 7 6 9 19 36 44 37 30 39 21 15 9 6 296 29-38 186 17:00 18 4 3 17 19 38 36 49 39 35 24 17 3 13 315 29-38 197 18:00 11 0 0 7 16 22 25 33 29 23 20 18 3 8 215 29-38 132 19:00 7 0 0 6 7 14 22 21 22 21 14 6 1 3 144 29-38 100 20:00 5 0 0 2 8 17 21 21 13 20 13 6 0 3 129 29-38 92 21:00 9 2 4 0 5 5 5 11 11 15 6 3 2 4 82 30-39 48 22:00 0 0 0 0 4 4 4 10 8 4 3 0 4 4 45 27-36 30 23:00 1 0 0 1 1 3 0 2 5 3 3 2 0 1 22 33-42 15 Total 175 26 48 123 224 306 416 461 463 409 288 192 76 106 3313 Percent 5.3% 0.8% 1.4% 3.7% 6.8% 9.2% 12.6% 13.9% 14.0% 12.3% 8.7% 5.8% 2.3% 3.2% AM Peak 09:00 09:00 08:00 07:00 07:00 07:00 07:00 07:00 07:00 11:00 07:00 08:00 07:00 08:00 07:00 Vol. 15 4 7 12 25 28 32 32 28 28 20 21 6 14 247 PM Peak 16:00 16:00 12:00 17:00 16:00 17:00 16:00 17:00 13:00 16:00 15:00 18:00 16:00 17:00 17:00 Vol. 18 7 6 17 19 38 44 49 45 39 25 18 9 13 315 J-U-B Engineers, Inc. 422 W. Riverside, Suite 304 Spokane,WA 99201 (509)458-3727 Page 2 Site Code: Station ID: Indiana 1-90 Westbound Offramp at Desmet Latitude:0'0.000 Undefined 1-90 Westbound Offramp at Desmet J-U-B Engineers, Inc. 422 W. Riverside, Suite 304 Spokane,WA 99201 (509)458-3727 Page 3 Site Code: Station ID: Indiana 1-90 Westbound Offramp at Desmet Eastbound,Westbound Start 1 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 Time 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 999 Total 10/12/11 2 2 0 4 2 1 2 6 4 4 2 1 0 0 30 01:00 3 0 0 0 0 1 3 4 1 6 4 0 2 1 25 02:00 2 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 7 03:00 2 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 14 04:00 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 3 2 0 3 1 1 1 14 05:00 4 0 0 0 3 8 2 4 5 6 6 0 1 4 43 06:00 4 1 5 3 6 9 10 10 13 10 6 8 4 4 93 07:00 7 3 3 13 32 28 28 29 32 22 21 13 4 4 239 08:00 12 2 8 4 11 20 20 19 20 18 22 10 12 5 183 09:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 36 8 16 25 56 70 67 77 78 70 66 34 25 20 648 Percent 5.6% 1.2% 2.5% 3.9% 8.6% 10.8% 10.3% 11.9% 12.0% 10.8% 10.2% 5.2°k 3.9% 3.1% Latitude:0'0.000 Undefined Pace Number Speed in Pace 30-39 18 31-40 18 24-33 3 29-38 8 33-42 9 29-38 25 29-38 52 27-36 149 31-40 99 AM Peak 08:00 07:00 08:00 07:00 07:00 07:00 07:00 07:00 07:00 07:00 08:00 07:00 08:00 08:00 07:00 Vol. 12 3 8 13 32 28 28 29 32 22 22 13 12 5 239 PM Peak Vol. Total 355 53 119 246 459 576 796 861 890 759 546 338 162 183 6343 Percent 5.6% 0.8% 1.9% 3.9% 7.2% 9.1% 12.5% 13.6% 14.0% 12.0% 8.6% 5.3% 2.6% 2.9% 15th Percentile : 27 MPH 50th Percentile : 34 MPH 85th Percentile : 40 MPH 95th Percentile : 43 MPH Stats 10 MPH Pace Speed: 29-38 MPH Number in Pace: 3882 Percent in Pace : 61.2% Number of Vehicles>35 MPH : 2433 Percent of Vehicles>35 MPH : 38.4% Mean Speed(Average): 33 MPH Indiana-Parkway: Desmet to Flora Eastbound Start 1 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 Pace Number Time 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 999 Total Speed in Pace 10/24/11 01:00 * 02:00 * 03:00 * 04:00 * 05:00 * 06:00 * 07:00 * 08:00 * 09:00 * 10:00 * * * * * * * * * * * 11:00 1 0 1 3 2 9 6 11 8 4 4 1 1 0 51 29-38 38 12 PM 0 0 1 1 4 8 9 7 9 6 4 1 1 1 52 29-38 39 13:00 0 0 1 4 3 6 6 8 3 2 3 2 1 0 39 25-34 27 14:00 1 0 1 1 4 9 9 11 13 2 5 4 0 2 62 27-36 46 15:00 1 1 0 1 4 6 10 12 17 8 1 2 0 0 63 29-38 53 16:00 0 0 1 2 4 6 18 15 14 5 8 2 2 2 79 31-40 60 17:00 0 1 0 3 10 12 23 22 21 12 7 5 2 3 121 29-38 90 18:00 0 0 0 2 0 8 7 14 10 6 7 2 1 2 59 29-38 45 19:00 0 0 0 1 2 4 6 7 2 8 4 2 1 0 37 29-38 27 20:00 0 0 0 4 1 5 5 4 5 1 1 2 4 1 33 26-35 20 21:00 0 0 0 1 1 1 2 2 4 4 5 4 0 0 24 33-42 19 22:00 0 0 1 0 0 1 2 2 2 4 0 0 0 0 12 29-38 11 23:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 2 2 1 1 1 10 35-44 8 Total 3 2 6 23 35 75 104 115 110 64 51 28 14 12 642 Percent 0.5% 0.3% 0.9% 3.6% 5.5% 11.7% 16.2% 17.9% 17.1% 10.0% 7.9% 4.4% 2.2% 1.9% AM Peak 11:00 11:00 11:00 11:00 11:00 11:00 11:00 11:00 11:00 11:00 11:00 11:00 11:00 Vol. 1 1 3 2 9 6 11 8 4 4 1 1 51 PM Peak 14:00 15:00 12:00 13:00 17:00 17:00 17:00 17:00 17:00 17:00 16:00 17:00 20:00 17:00 17:00 Vol. 1 1 1 4 10 12 23 22 21 12 8 5 4 3 121 J-U-B Engineers, Inc. 422 W. Riverside, Suite 304 Spokane,WA 99201 (509)458-3727 Page 1 Site Code: INDIANA PARKWAY Station ID: DESMET-FLORA Latitude:0'0.000 South Indiana-Parkway: Desmet to Flora Eastbound Start 1 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 Pace Number Time 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 999 Total Speed in Pace 10/25/11 0 0 0 2 0 1 1 1 1 0 3 0 0 0 9 30-39 6 01:00 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 16-25 1 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 34-43 2 03:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 26-35 1 04:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 2 30-39 2 05:00 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 6 28-37 6 06:00 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 5 29-38 4 07:00 0 0 1 0 0 2 5 3 3 3 1 1 0 0 19 29-38 16 08:00 7 6 2 2 3 0 6 2 1 2 1 0 0 1 33 19-28 13 09:00 0 2 1 1 2 2 4 1 6 2 4 0 0 0 25 31-40 17 10:00 2 1 0 0 5 5 6 3 3 2 2 1 1 0 31 27-36 22 11:00 0 0 1 1 2 1 5 13 7 7 1 4 0 0 42 29-38 33 12 PM 0 0 0 2 6 5 8 14 11 6 2 0 0 0 54 27-36 44 13:00 0 2 2 4 1 6 6 9 11 1 3 3 1 0 49 27-36 33 14:00 1 0 1 5 4 5 7 14 12 3 4 3 1 1 61 27-36 42 15:00 3 0 1 5 3 9 16 11 12 10 4 1 2 2 79 29-38 58 16:00 0 2 0 2 7 11 12 15 14 11 8 1 0 2 85 29-38 63 17:00 1 0 1 1 4 12 26 30 34 22 10 2 1 3 147 29-38 124 18:00 0 2 0 0 1 2 8 12 18 4 8 0 3 0 58 31-40 50 19:00 0 0 0 0 5 1 10 6 9 2 5 1 2 0 41 31-40 32 20:00 0 0 1 0 1 4 3 11 9 5 4 0 0 1 39 29-38 32 21:00 0 0 0 1 1 8 3 4 1 5 5 1 0 2 31 29-38 21 22:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 5 3 1 2 0 0 2 16 31-40 14 23:00 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 8 27-36 7 Total 14 15 11 28 47 77 131 156 162 91 68 18 12 14 844 Percent 1.7% 1.8% 1.3% 3.3% 5.6% 9.1% 15.5% 18.5% 19.2% 10.8% 8.1% 2.1% 1.4% 1.7% AM Peak 08:00 08:00 08:00 00:00 10:00 10:00 08:00 11:00 11:00 11:00 09:00 11:00 02:00 08:00 11:00 Vol. 7 6 2 2 5 5 6 13 7 7 4 4 1 1 42 PM Peak 15:00 13:00 13:00 14:00 16:00 17:00 17:00 17:00 17:00 17:00 17:00 13:00 18:00 17:00 17:00 Vol. 3 2 2 5 7 12 26 30 34 22 10 3 3 3 147 J-U-B Engineers, Inc. 422 W. Riverside, Suite 304 Spokane,WA 99201 (509)458-3727 Page 2 Site Code: INDIANA PARKWAY Station ID: DESMET-FLORA Latitude:0'0.000 South Indiana-Parkway: Desmet to Flora Eastbound Start 1 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 Pace Number Time 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 999 Total Speed in Pace 10/26/11 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 3 24-33 2 01:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 5 30-39 5 03:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 24-33 1 04:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 26-35 3 05:00 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 6 29-38 5 06:00 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 4 1 0 0 0 8 30-39 8 07:00 0 1 0 0 0 1 5 0 4 3 0 2 0 0 16 29-38 13 08:00 0 0 0 2 2 5 7 7 2 1 1 0 0 0 27 25-34 23 09:00 0 0 1 0 1 1 7 3 4 0 0 2 0 0 19 27-36 16 10:00 2 0 1 0 3 5 3 9 3 2 1 2 0 1 32 27-36 23 11:00 4 2 4 1 3 7 5 6 8 4 4 0 0 0 48 28-37 30 12 PM 0 0 1 2 4 8 15 11 8 3 5 2 0 1 60 27-36 46 13:00 0 0 3 2 6 5 6 10 11 3 2 2 1 0 51 27-36 38 14:00 0 1 0 1 3 10 10 11 11 6 3 2 2 0 60 29-38 48 15:00 0 0 0 4 8 5 10 14 7 11 9 1 1 0 70 31-40 51 16:00 2 0 0 7 5 13 17 17 12 5 3 2 2 0 85 28-37 65 17:00 1 0 1 3 7 11 10 25 36 18 4 0 1 3 120 29-38 100 18:00 0 0 0 0 0 13 6 13 19 4 4 0 1 1 61 29-38 55 19:00 1 0 0 0 2 1 8 13 6 9 4 2 2 1 49 31-40 40 20:00 0 1 0 2 2 3 3 5 4 6 2 4 0 1 33 29-38 21 21:00 0 0 0 1 2 4 4 6 4 6 5 1 1 5 39 30-39 25 22:00 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 3 3 4 1 3 0 0 18 32-41 14 23:00 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 2 1 1 1 0 0 9 32-41 8 Total 10 5 11 26 50 97 123 159 148 91 52 27 11 14 824 Percent 1.2% 0.6% 1.3% 3.2% 6.1% 11.8% 14.9% 19.3% 18.0% 11.0% 6.3% 3.3% 1.3% 1.7% AM Peak 11:00 11:00 11:00 08:00 10:00 11:00 08:00 10:00 11:00 06:00 11:00 07:00 03:00 11:00 Vol. 4 2 4 2 3 7 7 9 8 4 4 2 1 48 PM Peak 16:00 14:00 13:00 16:00 15:00 16:00 16:00 17:00 17:00 17:00 15:00 20:00 14:00 21:00 17:00 Vol. 2 1 3 7 8 13 17 25 36 18 9 4 2 5 120 J-U-B Engineers, Inc. 422 W. Riverside, Suite 304 Spokane,WA 99201 (509)458-3727 Page 3 Site Code: INDIANA PARKWAY Station ID: DESMET-FLORA Latitude:0'0.000 South Indiana-Parkway: Desmet to Flora Eastbound Start Time 10/27/11 01:00 02:00 03:00 04:00 05:00 06:00 07:00 08:00 09:00 10:00 11:00 12 PM 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:00 21:00 22:00 23:00 J-U-B Engineers, Inc. 422 W. Riverside, Suite 304 Spokane,WA 99201 (509)458-3727 Page 4 Site Code: INDIANA PARKWAY Station ID: DESMET-FLORA Latitude:0'0.000 South 1 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 Pace Number 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 999 Total Speed in Pace 1 0 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 23-32 4 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 2 0 1 0 0 0 7 30-39 7 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 5 29-38 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 28-37 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 5 28-37 4 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 4 28-37 4 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 1 4 0 0 0 8 31-40 7 0 0 0 0 2 2 4 3 1 0 0 0 0 12 28-37 12 1 0 1 1 3 4 3 3 3 0 0 0 1 21 28-37 16 0 0 2 1 2 4 4 4 2 1 2 1 0 25 28-37 16 Total 3 2 1 4 3 8 17 16 17 12 6 3 1 1 94 Percent 3.2% 2.1% 1.1% 4.3% 3.2% 8.5% 18.1% 17.0% 18.1% 12.8% 6.4% 3.2% 1.1% 1.1% AM Peak 09:00 00:00 02:00 09:00 06:00 08:00 08:00 07:00 09:00 08:00 06:00 09:00 09:00 08:00 09:00 Vol. 2 1 1 2 1 3 4 4 4 3 4 2 1 1 25 PM Peak Vol. Total 30 24 29 81 135 257 375 446 437 258 177 76 38 41 2404 Percent 1.2% 1.0% 1.2% 3.4% 5.6% 10.7% 15.6% 18.6% 18.2% 10.7% 7.4% 3.2% 1.6% 1.7% 15th Percentile : 29 MPH 50th Percentile : 34 MPH 85th Percentile : 38 MPH 95th Percentile : 41 MPH Stats 10 MPH Pace Speed: 29-38 MPH Number in Pace: 1773 Percent in Pace : 73.8% Number of Vehicles>35 MPH : 808 Percent of Vehicles>35 MPH : 33.6% Mean Speed(Average): 34 MPH Mission: Flora to Barker Eastbound,Westbound J-U-B Engineers, Inc. 422 W. Riverside, Suite 304 Spokane,WA 99201 (509)458-3727 Page 1 Site Code: MISSION Station ID: FLORA-BARKER Latitude:0'0.000 South Start 1 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 Pace Number Time 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 999 Total Speed in Pace 10/10/11 01:00 * 02:00 * 03:00 * 04:00 * 05:00 * 06:00 * 07:00 * 08:00 * 09:00 * 10:00 * 11:00 * 12 PM 3 1 6 3 12 28 44 55 46 38 24 8 2 2 272 29-38 211 13:00 2 1 1 3 8 15 32 56 52 37 18 7 1 3 236 31-40 195 14:00 6 3 2 4 6 13 43 39 74 54 29 15 3 0 291 31-40 239 15:00 5 0 1 5 11 24 37 54 67 33 26 8 3 2 276 31-40 217 16:00 10 1 4 2 7 14 37 65 78 64 31 7 5 3 328 31-40 275 17:00 4 0 2 3 8 20 38 72 86 52 27 11 1 0 324 31-40 275 18:00 6 1 1 4 9 17 35 53 66 23 11 4 2 0 232 29-38 194 19:00 1 0 2 5 7 11 31 27 31 18 9 3 2 0 147 29-38 118 20:00 2 0 2 4 8 9 16 19 27 21 13 1 1 1 124 31-40 96 21:00 2 0 0 1 2 5 4 6 15 15 4 4 3 1 62 29-38 45 22:00 0 0 0 0 1 2 3 5 13 7 3 3 2 1 40 32-41 32 23:00 0 0 0 0 1 3 9 2 11 2 1 2 0 2 33 28-37 27 Total 41 7 21 34 80 161 329 453 566 364 196 73 25 15 2365 Percent 1.7% 0.3% 0.9% 1.4% 3.4% 6.8% 13.9% 19.2% 23.9% 15.4% 8.3% 3.1% 1.1% 0.6% AM Peak Vol. PM Peak 16:00 14:00 12:00 15:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 17:00 17:00 16:00 16:00 14:00 16:00 13:00 16:00 Vol. 10 3 6 5 12 28 44 72 86 64 31 15 5 3 328 Mission: Flora to Barker Eastbound,Westbound Start 1 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 Pace Number Time 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 999 Total Speed in Pace 10/11/11 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 2 0 2 4 1 0 0 13 31-40 12 01:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 4 31-40 3 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 30-39 2 03:00 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 6 25-34 5 04:00 1 0 0 0 2 1 2 0 1 2 1 1 0 1 12 27-36 6 05:00 0 0 1 4 3 1 3 8 5 4 2 3 2 1 37 32-41 23 06:00 3 2 2 0 0 7 10 21 18 17 12 4 0 2 98 31-40 78 07:00 0 1 5 5 4 13 19 39 52 33 17 4 0 1 193 31-40 160 08:00 2 0 3 4 7 11 26 41 35 28 13 3 2 0 175 30-39 143 09:00 3 0 0 1 7 11 20 41 39 25 17 4 2 2 172 31-40 142 10:00 4 1 1 1 6 15 18 32 49 31 13 6 4 1 182 29-38 145 11:00 3 1 2 6 4 15 20 57 60 41 18 8 5 0 240 31-40 196 12 PM 5 1 2 2 11 15 28 43 61 38 36 10 4 3 259 31-40 206 13:00 1 1 1 2 4 9 32 45 77 47 17 6 2 4 248 31-40 218 14:00 5 3 2 10 11 11 24 46 58 47 29 13 6 5 270 31-40 204 15:00 7 1 1 7 7 25 32 48 81 41 34 8 2 2 296 31-40 236 16:00 10 2 5 6 7 18 31 67 61 58 39 17 4 1 326 31-40 256 17:00 9 0 0 4 10 12 32 56 78 60 41 21 3 3 329 31-40 267 18:00 4 0 0 7 15 18 46 40 57 35 16 5 1 1 245 29-38 196 19:00 2 1 1 1 3 7 20 39 26 31 13 2 0 1 147 31-40 129 20:00 0 0 1 2 5 11 25 19 24 10 12 3 1 0 113 30-39 90 21:00 4 0 0 3 1 1 7 2 5 10 7 2 0 1 43 31-40 31 22:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 63 14 27 67 107 202 400 648 789 561 343 122 38 29 3410 Percent 1.8% 0.4% 0.8% 2.0% 3.1% 5.9% 11.7% 19.0% 23.1% 16.5% 10.1% 3.6% 1.1% 0.9% AM Peak 10:00 06:00 07:00 11:00 08:00 10:00 08:00 11:00 11:00 11:00 11:00 11:00 11:00 06:00 11:00 Vol. 4 2 5 6 7 15 26 57 60 41 18 8 5 2 240 PM Peak 16:00 14:00 16:00 14:00 18:00 15:00 18:00 16:00 15:00 17:00 17:00 17:00 14:00 14:00 17:00 Vol. 10 3 5 10 15 25 46 67 81 60 41 21 6 5 329 J-U-B Engineers, Inc. 422 W. Riverside, Suite 304 Spokane,WA 99201 (509)458-3727 Page 2 Site Code: MISSION Station ID: FLORA-BARKER Latitude:0'0.000 South Mission: Flora to Barker Eastbound,Westbound J-U-B Engineers, Inc. 422 W. Riverside, Suite 304 Spokane,WA 99201 (509)458-3727 Page 3 Site Code: MISSION Station ID: FLORA-BARKER Latitude:0'0.000 South Start 1 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 Pace Number Time 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 999 Total Speed in Pace 10/12/11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 07:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 08:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 09:00 * 10:00 * 11:00 * 12 PM * 13:00 * 14:00 * 15:00 * 16:00 * 17:00 * 18:00 * 19:00 * 20:00 * 21:00 * 22:00 * 23:00 * Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% AM Peak Vol. PM Peak Vol. Total 104 21 48 101 187 363 729 1101 1355 925 539 195 63 44 5775 Percent 1.8% 0.4% 0.8% 1.7% 3.2% 6.3% 12.6% 19.1% 23.5% 16.0% 9.3% 3.4% 1.1% 0.8% 15th Percentile : 31 MPH 50th Percentile : 35 MPH 85th Percentile : 38 MPH 95th Percentile : 41 MPH Stats 10 MPH Pace Speed: 31-40 MPH Number in Pace: 4649 Percent in Pace : 80.5% Number of Vehicles>35 MPH : 2443 Percent of Vehicles>35 MPH : 42.3% Mean Speed(Average): 34 MPH Mission Parkway: Desmet to Flora Westbound Start 1 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 Pace Number Time 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 999 Total Speed in Pace 10/24/11 01:00 * 02:00 * 03:00 * 04:00 * 05:00 * 06:00 * 07:00 * 08:00 * 09:00 * 10:00 0 2 2 2 5 13 14 14 8 0 0 0 1 0 61 27-36 54 11:00 3 0 3 3 7 5 9 10 4 3 1 0 0 0 48 26-35 35 12 PM 1 2 4 3 10 12 9 9 6 5 1 1 0 0 63 27-36 46 13:00 0 0 3 9 11 8 15 8 4 1 0 0 1 0 60 25-34 51 14:00 0 0 1 4 14 9 15 4 3 3 1 0 0 1 55 25-34 46 15:00 2 1 0 7 9 10 10 9 6 3 5 0 0 0 62 25-34 45 16:00 0 1 2 2 4 10 6 11 12 4 4 0 0 0 56 27-36 43 17:00 0 2 0 2 7 9 4 9 3 5 4 3 0 1 49 27-36 32 18:00 0 0 0 4 3 5 12 6 7 2 4 0 0 0 43 27-36 33 19:00 0 0 0 0 2 4 4 3 2 2 0 0 0 0 17 27-36 15 20:00 0 1 0 2 1 3 4 2 2 2 0 0 0 1 18 28-37 13 21:00 0 0 0 0 1 2 4 1 1 2 0 0 0 1 12 28-37 10 22:00 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 20-29 3 23:00 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 7 28-37 6 Total 6 9 15 39 76 92 107 87 59 34 20 4 2 4 554 Percent 1.1% 1.6% 2.7% 7.0% 13.7% 16.6% 19.3% 15.7% 10.6% 6.1% 3.6% 0.7% 0.4% 0.7% AM Peak 11:00 10:00 11:00 11:00 11:00 10:00 10:00 10:00 10:00 11:00 11:00 10:00 10:00 Vol. 3 2 3 3 7 13 14 14 8 3 1 1 61 PM Peak 15:00 12:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 12:00 13:00 16:00 16:00 12:00 15:00 17:00 13:00 14:00 12:00 Vol. 2 2 4 9 14 12 15 11 12 5 5 3 1 1 63 J-U-B Engineers, Inc. 422 W. Riverside, Suite 304 Spokane,WA 99201 (509)458-3727 Page 1 Site Code: MISSION PARKWAY Station ID: DESMET-FLORA Latitude:0'0.000 South Mission Parkway: Desmet to Flora Westbound Start 1 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 Pace Number Time 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 999 Total Speed in Pace 10/25/11 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 16-25 1 01:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 24-33 1 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 3 32-41 3 03:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 28-37 1 04:00 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 1 1 1 1 2 0 0 11 29-38 8 05:00 0 0 0 0 2 3 4 6 7 1 1 0 1 2 27 27-36 22 06:00 2 0 0 1 8 15 13 16 9 7 0 1 0 0 72 27-36 61 07:00 0 0 2 16 25 35 25 15 7 6 3 0 0 0 134 25-34 116 08:00 1 2 7 7 7 12 21 13 9 6 5 1 1 0 92 26-35 62 09:00 0 2 1 2 14 9 10 10 8 5 2 1 0 1 65 27-36 51 10:00 2 0 0 2 11 10 12 11 8 3 1 1 0 0 61 27-36 52 11:00 0 1 1 3 4 14 14 4 3 2 0 0 0 0 46 26-35 40 12 PM 1 2 1 9 12 12 12 12 3 2 3 1 0 0 70 25-34 57 13:00 1 3 2 4 9 17 8 5 6 1 3 1 0 2 62 27-36 45 14:00 0 0 1 4 4 13 10 13 7 10 2 1 0 0 65 29-38 53 15:00 2 0 2 4 8 4 9 7 7 8 1 2 0 0 54 27-36 35 16:00 0 1 1 1 3 11 15 10 4 8 1 1 0 0 56 29-38 48 17:00 0 1 1 3 8 14 17 12 15 1 4 3 0 0 79 27-36 66 18:00 0 0 1 3 2 11 4 10 8 1 1 0 1 2 44 27-36 35 19:00 0 0 1 1 0 3 6 8 4 2 0 0 0 2 27 29-38 23 20:00 0 1 0 1 3 4 3 3 1 1 1 0 0 0 18 25-34 14 21:00 0 0 0 0 1 1 3 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 8 27-36 8 22:00 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 23-32 3 23:00 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 6 27-36 5 Total 9 13 23 62 121 191 192 159 114 66 30 16 3 9 1008 Percent 0.9% 1.3% 2.3% 6.2% 12.0% 18.9% 19.0% 15.8% 11.3% 6.5% 3.0% 1.6% 0.3% 0.9% AM Peak 06:00 08:00 08:00 07:00 07:00 07:00 07:00 06:00 06:00 06:00 08:00 04:00 05:00 05:00 07:00 Vol. 2 2 7 16 25 35 25 16 9 7 5 2 1 2 134 PM Peak 15:00 13:00 13:00 12:00 12:00 13:00 17:00 14:00 17:00 14:00 17:00 17:00 18:00 13:00 17:00 Vol. 2 3 2 9 12 17 17 13 15 10 4 3 1 2 79 J-U-B Engineers, Inc. 422 W. Riverside, Suite 304 Spokane,WA 99201 (509)458-3727 Page 2 Site Code: MISSION PARKWAY Station ID: DESMET-FLORA Latitude:0'0.000 South Mission Parkway: Desmet to Flora Westbound Start 1 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 Pace Number Time 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 999 Total Speed in Pace 10/26/11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01:00 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 24-33 3 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 24-33 1 03:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 30-39 2 04:00 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 1 3 0 0 0 1 0 9 27-36 8 05:00 0 0 0 1 3 1 8 8 8 2 1 2 0 2 36 27-36 28 06:00 0 0 0 3 5 11 15 15 12 6 2 1 0 0 70 28-37 59 07:00 1 0 2 6 23 25 36 23 16 5 5 1 0 1 144 27-36 123 08:00 0 0 1 3 7 12 20 21 10 9 1 2 1 0 87 28-37 72 09:00 0 0 1 2 4 17 11 10 5 2 2 0 0 1 55 27-36 47 10:00 0 0 2 7 7 8 8 12 6 4 2 0 0 0 56 25-34 42 11:00 1 1 3 6 8 13 12 5 6 4 2 1 0 0 62 25-34 44 12 PM 0 2 5 4 14 11 8 12 3 3 2 0 0 0 64 25-34 49 13:00 1 4 4 2 6 9 4 6 7 3 0 0 0 0 46 27-36 32 14:00 1 1 1 4 6 3 4 8 5 2 0 2 0 0 37 26-35 26 15:00 0 0 4 0 4 6 13 12 6 5 2 1 0 1 54 28-37 42 16:00 0 0 2 6 5 7 10 5 11 4 2 1 0 0 53 27-36 38 17:00 0 1 0 2 10 7 15 11 5 6 1 0 1 0 59 27-36 48 18:00 0 0 0 3 3 4 8 8 13 4 2 1 1 1 48 28-37 37 19:00 0 0 2 0 1 3 3 7 3 0 4 1 0 0 24 27-36 17 20:00 0 0 2 3 1 2 2 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 14 23-32 10 21:00 0 0 0 0 0 3 5 4 1 3 0 0 0 0 16 29-38 16 22:00 0 0 1 1 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 23-32 6 23:00 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 24-33 2 Total 4 9 30 53 107 147 188 174 121 63 29 13 4 6 948 Percent 0.4% 0.9% 3.2% 5.6% 11.3% 15.5% 19.8% 18.4% 12.8% 6.6% 3.1% 1.4% 0.4% 0.6% AM Peak 07:00 11:00 11:00 10:00 07:00 07:00 07:00 07:00 07:00 08:00 07:00 05:00 04:00 05:00 07:00 Vol. 1 1 3 7 23 25 36 23 16 9 5 2 1 2 144 PM Peak 13:00 13:00 12:00 16:00 12:00 12:00 17:00 12:00 18:00 17:00 19:00 14:00 17:00 15:00 12:00 Vol. 1 4 5 6 14 11 15 12 13 6 4 2 1 1 64 J-U-B Engineers, Inc. 422 W. Riverside, Suite 304 Spokane,WA 99201 (509)458-3727 Page 3 Site Code: MISSION PARKWAY Station ID: DESMET-FLORA Latitude:0'0.000 South Mission Parkway: Desmet to Flora Westbound Start Time 10/27/11 01:00 02:00 03:00 04:00 05:00 06:00 07:00 08:00 09:00 10:00 11:00 12 PM 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:00 21:00 22:00 23:00 J-U-B Engineers, Inc. 422 W. Riverside, Suite 304 Spokane,WA 99201 (509)458-3727 Page 4 Site Code: MISSION PARKWAY Station ID: DESMET-FLORA Latitude:0'0.000 South 1 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 Pace Number 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 999 Total Speed in Pace 1 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 5 20-29 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 3 30-39 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 12-21 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 18-27 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 3 1 1 0 0 1 0 8 28-37 7 0 0 1 2 3 4 6 7 5 3 2 1 2 36 30-39 26 0 0 1 3 4 11 10 12 6 4 1 0 1 53 29-38 43 0 3 5 22 23 22 25 20 4 0 2 0 2 128 27-36 112 2 3 5 10 15 21 14 13 4 4 3 0 0 94 27-36 73 0 3 3 13 12 9 10 9 3 1 1 0 0 64 27-36 53 Total 0 5 9 15 53 60 67 70 62 24 14 9 2 5 395 Percent 0.0% 1.3% 2.3% 3.8% 13.4% 15.2% 17.0% 17.7% 15.7% 6.1% 3.5% 2.3% 0.5% 1.3% AM Peak 08:00 07:00 07:00 07:00 07:00 07:00 07:00 07:00 06:00 06:00 08:00 04:00 05:00 07:00 Vol. 2 3 5 22 23 22 25 20 6 4 3 1 2 128 PM Peak Vol. Total 19 36 77 169 357 490 554 490 356 187 93 42 11 24 2905 Percent 0.7% 1.2% 2.7% 5.8% 12.3% 16.9% 19.1% 16.9% 12.3% 6.4% 3.2% 1.4% 0.4% 0.8% 15th Percentile : 27 MPH 50th Percentile : 32 MPH 85th Percentile : 36 MPH 95th Percentile : 39 MPH Stats 10 MPH Pace Speed: 27-36 MPH Number in Pace: 2247 Percent in Pace : 77.3% Number of Vehicles>35 MPH : 535 Percent of Vehicles>35 MPH : 18.4% Mean Speed(Average): 32 MPH CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: November 15, 2011 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ® new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Motion Consideration: 2012 Stormwater Grants GOVERNING LEGISLATION: PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: On November 1, 2011 Council voiced no objection to staff proceeding with applying for two stormwater grants, and requested that additional information be brought back to Council on the proposed Decant Facility grant. BACKGROUND: The 2011 State Legislature provided a $30,000,000 appropriation for statewide stormwater construction projects. Jurisdictions statewide covered by a NPDES Municipal Stormwater Permit may apply for funding through a competitive grant application process. Projects must be complete by the end of the next biennium, June 30, 2015. The City of Spokane Valley Stormwater Utility staff has listed several projects that would qualify for consideration by the State including: • New Decant (Vactor Waste) Facility • Projects eliminating municipal outfalls to Chester Creek and Glenrose Drainage • Sprague, Park to Thierman Swale Project RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to authorize staff to submit an application for a stormwater grant for the proposed decant facility. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Requires a 25% local match which could come from the Stormwater Utility Fund, the Aquifer Protection Fund and/or Washington State Department of Transportation. STAFF CONTACT: Neil Kersten ATTACHMENTS: Presentation VALLL. a 0 STORM DRAIN DAN CALL TO REPORT 688-032 1 STORMWATER UTILITY DECANT FACILITY DISCUSSION STORMWATER UTILITY §Y§TEM Stormwater Structures Requiring Cleaning 7,350 Drywells 4,712 Drywells have no catchbasins or swales for treatment 2,500 Catchbasins with Sumps 2,500 Curb and Sidewalk Inlets 4 Pump Stations Only 1262 Drywells are in swales and meet current design standards STORMWATER UTILITY MAINTENANCE Maintenance Schedule: Catchbasins every 3 years Drywells without Catchbasins every 3-7 years Curb and Sidewalk Inlets every 3-7 years 2007 - 2010 Actual Maintenance Work: 212 Drywells per Year 457 Catchbasins per Year 100 Curb and Sidewalk Inlets per Year i i mid UNDERGROUND INJECTION CONTROL PROGRM Assessment of all drywells must be completed by February, 2013 UIC wells considered a high threat to groundwater if: Well Head Protection Areas Critical Aquifer Recharge Area Sole Source Aquifer Must prepare and implement a schedule for retrofitting following Ecology's Stormwater Manual Guidance 2010 Hauling Costs Task Wood Pellets Travel to pellets Loading Pellets Soak Travel to Grahm Rd. Dump Return to Shop Total Hours 30 34.66 48.59 147.75 76.86 29. 16 76.35 425.37 Cost/Hr. $2, 121 $128.53 $128.53 $128.53 $128.53 $128.53 $128.53 Totals $18,543 $4,455 $6,245 $18,990 $9,879 $3,748 $9,813 ', Proposed Decant Hauling Cost Task Load End Dump Travel to Grahm Rd. Dump p Return to Shop Total Hours 16.5 30 15 30 91 .5 Cost/Hr. $128.53 $128.53 $128.53 $128.53 Totals $2, 121 $3,856 $1 ,928 $3,856 $11 ,761 STORMWATER UTILITY DECANT FACILITY Summary: Save $40, 000 - $ 60,000 per year in hauling costs Save $ 7 ,000 in landfill disposal costs 65% - 85% increase in structure cleaning No additional City staffing required - V-14010rvoi,9,Acv. 5?3% Ofehr...e 2-;* TYPICAL DECANT FACILITY Estimate Costs: $400,000 RECYCLING DECANT FACILITY Estimate Costs: $ 1,000,000 STORMWATER UTILITY DECANT FACILITY Final project will be based on available funding, engineering study and Ecology's requirements Staff will come back to Council with detailed facility concepts and cost estimates prior to proceeding with the project. Questions? CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: November 15, 2011 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing information ® admin. report spending legislation executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Planning Commission Rules of Procedure Update GOVERNING LEGISLATION: Spokane Valley Municipal Code — Chapter 18.10 PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Council approved changes to the Planning Commission Rules of Procedure on February 9, 2010. BACKGROUND: SVMC Chapter 18.10.030(C) requires the Planning Commission to adopt Rules of Procedure as necessary to conduct business, subject to approval of City Council. The Planning Commission Rules of Procedure must be reviewed and updated every other year with the last update occurring February 9, 2010. The Planning Commission considered minor amendments to the Rules of Procedure at their meeting on October 28, 2011. By majority vote, the Planning Commission voted to approve the amendments (see attached Rules of Procedure), including: • Changing "Old" to "Unfinished" Business (Page 3 of 6). • Changing "The Secretary records a roll call vote" to "The Chair calls for a vote" (Page 4 of 6). Changing "old" to "unfinished" business is consistent with terminology used in Roberts Rules of Order. Votes are not conducted by a roll call; therefore, the procedure described is inconsistent with current practice. OPTIONS: Consider the proposed changes, with or without additional changes. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Consensus that staff prepare a resolution to adopt the Planning Commission Rules of Procedure proposed changes, and schedule for council approval consideration for the November 29, 2011 council meeting. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: N/A STAFF CONTACT: Scott Kuhta, AICP, Planning Manager ATTACHMENTS: Updated Planning Commission Rules of Procedure City of Spokane Valley Planning Commission RULES OF PROCEDURE Updated 06-22-2006 Updated 12 10 200902-09-2010 We, the members of the Planning Commission of the City of Spokane Valley, State of Washington, pursuant to the City of Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) 18.10, do - 9y adopt and publish the following Rules of Procedure .., ORGANIZATION AND RULES OF P C RE 1. Name A. The "City of Spokane Valley Planning Co 1 gj ssio " hereinafte - erred to, as the "Commission" is an advisory body created by >e City Council for pu o i consistent with SVMC 18.10. 2. Location A. The Commission offices shall be the City Hall of the Ci + pokane Valley. 3. Officers Unless otherwise required by a vacancy j o - Commissi, all organize every year in accordance with SVMC 18.10. A. Officers of the Com••' .. shall be ele j I om its i ership; the officers shall be Chair, Vice Chair, and , ®- . .oriate officer at the Co® mission may choose to approve and appoint by maj® vote. B. The Chair shall I •e ove e Commission . . exercise all powers incidental to the office, retaining however, 1 m 1 1 embe o f the Commission to propose motions, second motio e a vot- +rde o o 9 s of the Commission. C. P ice-Cha . in t,° o Bence of the Chair from any meeting, perform all the duties umbent upon .ir, an i ' e full right as a member of the Commission in the same -r as the Chair. 4. Secrets the Comm on A. The Dire +f the De e ment of Community Development or his/her designee shall serve as the Secretary to om, sion. B. The Secretary provide for a recording of all Commission meetings, including public hearings and s ensure that summary minutes of all public hearings are prepared and filed in the public record. C. The Secretary will conduct and record a roll call of the Commission members at each meeting, public hearing and study session. 5. Election of Officers A. Officers shall be elected at the first regular meeting in the 12th calendar month of each year, by majority vote of the membership of the Commission. Terms of office shall run from January 1 until December 31 or until a successor has been elected. No Commission member shall serve Page 1 of 6 1 Planning Commission Rules of Procedure Updated .02-09-201010 2009 more than two full consecutive terms as Chair of the Commission. No member shall serve as vice-chair for more than two full consecutive terms. B. A vacancy in any office will be filled by a special election,to be held at a convenient time with a majority present. In the event that the office of Chair is vacated,the vice-chair shall serve in that capacity until the required special election is held. Any member of the Commission is eligible to fill the vacancy. However,no member can hold two office positions. 6. Quorum A. A quorum shall consist of four members of the Commission and no action can be taken in the absence of a quorum except to adjourn the meeting to a subseq - i te. A quorum must be present for public hearings and study sessions. 7. Voting A. The affirmative vote of a majority of those present s .11 ®- necess: or the adoption of any motion or other general matter. B. For the conduct of business dealing with matter ich require adoption or 4 es to the City's Comprehensive Plan and the election of of - ,t leastkur affirmative v. R list be cast. Each member of the Commission is entitled to on but o xy shall be allo -d. C. No member may participate or vote on a matter unle member has been in attendance at all public hearings regarding such ma or has listened to k o ed recording of the public hearing and reviewed the written record of t er in question. 8. Meetings A. There shall be at least one regular mee 4g ea .g+ :dditional meetings scheduled as necessary. Regular - gs shall be s -Con t and 4th Thursdays of the month, commencing at 6-' ending no ter than 9-J i p.m. Meeting ending time can be extende by��`a essis or pu•� �# hearings a 1 d- ,n•�d Meetings may be used for general planning matte 1. Meetings on General Pl. 4.4 afters. c.-neral planning matters to be reviewed by the C mis ' will be typically b- - e - by a study session of the Commission to discuss e issues w1 Communit Development Department staff. Generally,no testimony from the public shall taken at a saly ses ion. blic Hearing e tng. A public hearing is a meeting wherein general business and public ng items, such s the Comprehensive Plan and development regulations are discussed ided. 3. Scher - eetin_ ay be canceled or convened at other times if deemed necessary by the Chair or, e . -nce of the Chair,by the Vice-Chair. Notice of cancellation shall be given personally rmmission Members and to the public by posting a notice at Commission offices. 4. The recommended order of business for meetings is: a. Call to order by Chair. b. Pledge of Allegiance. c. Roll call by recording secretary. d. Approval of Agenda. e. Approval or amendment of minutes. Page 2 of 6 1 Planning Commission Rules of Procedure Updated .02-09-201010 2009 f. Public Comment g. Commission Members Report h. Administrative Report. i. Commission Business. a.Old Unfinished Business b.New Business j. For the Good of the Order. k. Adjournment. B. Planning Commission meetings shall be held in accordant- - requirements of the Open Meetings Act,RCW Chapter 42.30. C. Special meetings and study sessions may be called: 1. By the request of the Chair,or,in the Chair's a ence,by the Vice-Cha 2. By the written request of three or more members of the + I mission. 3. By agreed motion of the Commission. 9. Conduct of Hearings A. Actions for a Planning Commission ® caring. Prior to the start of the public hearing, e . . require th. . persons wishing to be heard shall sign in with the Secretary, giving i eir n. • + .ddres-;s, the agenda item, and whether they wish to speak as Rroponent, oppon• t, • +the ■ ° 1 person who fails to sign in shall not be permitted + + ak until all those ®o signed i 7 ave done so. At any public hearing, persons who h. {° signed in ad wish to be , .rd shall be given an opportunity to be heard.. The Chair, subje + •ncurrence y the major +f the Commission, may establish time limits and otherwise contro + entati+ . The Chair ma . ge the order of speakers so that testimony is heard in the most + . ® + +' m i.e. + oponents, opponents, adjacent owners, vested inter- B. P 4 Chair intr++ the a:° +. item, opens the public hearing, and announces the following es of Order: 1. comments b ® +pone ., opponents, or the public shall be made from the speaker's , and any i + idual making comments shall first give his/her name and address. This is r d because a official recorded transcript of the public hearing is being made. 2. It is no + sa + be a proponent or opponent in order to speak. If you cons + ourself neither a proponent nor opponent,please speak during the proponent portion ands+entify yourself as neither a proponent nor an opponent. 3. No comments shall be made from any other location, and anyone making "out of order" comments shall be subject to removal from the meeting. 4. Demonstrations, applause or other audience participation during or at the conclusion of anyone's presentation are prohibited. It is distracting to the Commission and persons testifying. Page 3 of 6 1 Planning Commission Rules of Procedure Updated .02-09-201010 2009 5. These rules are intended to promote an orderly system of holding a public hearing, to give persons an opportunity to be heard and to ensure that individuals are not embarrassed by exercising their right of free speech. C. When the Commission conducts a hearing to which the Appearance of Fairness Doctrine applies, the Chair(or in the case of a potential violation by that individual,the Vice Chair)will ask if any Commission member knows of any reason which would require such member to excuse themselves pursuant to the Appearance of Fairness Doctrine. The form of the announcement is as follows: All Commission members should now give consideration as to whe ey have: 1. A demonstrated bias or prejudice for or against any party to rrocee ings; 2. A direct or indirect financial interest in the outcome of •- i -°s ing; 3. A prejudgment of the issue prior to hearing the facts o e recori 4. Had ex parte contact with any individual, exc ministrative with regard to an issue prior to the hearing. Please refer to Se . 16(B) for more speci •rmation on how to proceed where there has been an ex pars munica +n. If any Commission member should answer in fi . then the Com• ssion members should state the reason for his/her answer so tha air may inquire of administration as to whether a violation of the A• earance of Fairness 'ne exists. CONDUCTI PUBLIC HEA a. The Chair announces the . .ens the pu l caring stating the date and time. b. The Chair allows staff to desc e matter -r consideration and place matters in the p ® record. c. - .it inqui .s to whether I mmissioners have any questions of staff. If any om en me ®er has questions appropriate individual will be recalled. • e Chai s o o o » - ®ponents and the public to offer testimony and ce on I -nding ma The Chair may allow Commission members to ask qu- of an on at the conclusion of their testimony. e. At the elusion e public testimony, the Chair asks staff if there is_any additiona ® i rmati•.,testimony or evidence to submit for the record. The Chair er closes or continues the public hearing. Additional testimony may +t be req, ted or considered after the closing of the public hearing, unless the ® de es the record open until a date certain for the purpose of receiving written to or materials. g. Th- hair inquires if there is a motion by any Commission member. If a motion is made, it shall be in the form of an affirmative motion. Affirmative motion are preferred to prevent"approval by default"of a failed negative motion. Following the motion and its second,discussion occurs among Commission members. h. The Chair inquires if there is any further discussion by the Commission members. i. The Chair inquires if there are any final comments or recommendations from staff. j. The Chair inquires of the Commission members if they are ready for the question. j-k. The Chair calls for the vote on the motion Page 4 of 6 Planning Commission Rules of Procedure Updated .02-09-201010 2009 k. The Secretary records a roll call vote. 1. The Chair may direct staff to prepare findings for approval. D. Pre-filing of testimony or evidence is encouraged and may be delivered to the Department of Community Development in advance of a hearing. 10.Agenda, Staff Reports and Minutes for Regular Meetings. A. Typically, a copy of the agenda for every regular meeting of the Planning Commission shall be sent to each member up to seven(7)days prior to the date of the meeting. B. If available, staff reports will be sent to Planning Commission memo 'th the agenda. Agendas and staff reports will be made available to applicants and the pub ' . the same time. 11. Minutes and Communications with the City Council. A Minutes of all meetings shall be kept and the complete fi of proc- • t s and actions taken in connection therewith shall be considered the public r- i . s'filed wi ity Clerk. The Secretary shall provide the Commission - bers with a set of m' of the previous meeting. These minutes shall be considere . •prova the Commiss . regularly scheduled public meeting and upon approva sha ® t me j +f the official re + d of action of the Commission. Minutes shall also be transmitte + espo dence to the ity Council for general information. B The assigned City Council Liaison . •end meetings fo purposes of communications with the Council as set forth in th- OF SPO • • LLEY GOVERNANCE COORDINATION MANUAL". 12. Recording of Meetings Proceedings of all p ® t s, meetings, dy sessis4 and any special meetings shall be recorded and retain. 13. Temporary Co The Chair shall have au• • -m® +e .1 committees of one or more members and to appoint . ® to suc mittees, may be charged with such duties as examination, invest'® .tion and ® into • ,r more subjects of interest to the Commission. No temporary coitmittee shall have h - ®+wer t• . ® r- Commission to the endorsement of any plan or program. The Ch a' may appoint c s to co e ittees of the Commission. 14. Co I ° Conduct A. Prohibit- • its. Mem•° of the Commission are prohibited from: 1. Acting in a . , which would result in neglect of duty, misfeasance or malfeasance in office. 2. Acting in a anner that intentionally disrupts Commission meetings. 3. Missing six (6) or more regularly scheduled meetings or study sessions in a 12-month period without such absence being excused by the Commission. 4. Using his or her position to secure special privileges or exemptions for himself, herself, or others. 5. Directly or indirectly giving or agreeing to receive compensation, gifts,rewards, or gratuities from any source,except the City of Spokane Valley,for a matter connected with or related to the services as a member of the Commission,unless otherwise provided by law. Page 5 of 6 1 Planning Commission Rules of Procedure Updated .02-09-201010 2009 6. Accepting employment or engaging in business or professional activities that he or she might reasonably expect would require or induce said member to disclose confidential information acquired by reason of membership on the Commission. 7. Disclosing confidential information gained by reason of his or her membership on the Planning Commission or using such information for his or her personal gain or benefit. 15. Conflict of Interest A. Any Commission member having a direct or indirect interest in, or who would benefit from any matter, shall disclose this interest and shall, if deemed appropriat- by that commissioner or required by law,refrain from participating or voting on the matter. 16.Appearance of Fairness The Commission shall adhere to the applicable requirements + e a++°< ance of fairness doctrine, RCW Chapter 42.36. A. During the pendency of any quasi-judicial proceed' ,no +mmission m mber6may engage in ex parte communications with proponents or oppe is about a proposal inv lved in the pending proceeding,unless the Commission member: (1)_places on the record the substance of such ora + B 'tt- unications; (2)_provided that a public announcement of the conten + e communication and of the parties' right to rebut the substance of t 'ie communication sha + ade at each hearing where action is taken or considered on the s je This does not + + 'bit orrespondence between a citizen and Commission members if the co -. pondence is +- part of the record, when it pertains to the subject matter of a quasi-judi + +.-eding.4 ®CW 42.36.060) 17. Review of These Rules 4 'rocedure The Planning Com . on s -view these es of procedure on the first anniversary of their adoption and the +++ numbere ears thereaft- Any amendments identified by the Planning Commission sha be + . ded t+ e City Counci + eview and ratification. KNOW ALL PERSONS B 1 a That the u i° + -tart' - Spokane v alley Planning Commission does hereby certify that upon re and majors + - the a.+ - and forgoing rules have been duly adopted by the members of said + ssion. BY: Secretary of the Commission Date: Page 6 of 6 1 Planning Commission Rules of Procedure Updated .02-09-201010 2009 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: November 15, 2011 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑old business ® new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ®admin. Report ❑ pending legislation ❑executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Spokane Valley Municipal Code Text Amendment, (CTA 04-11): Recycling Facility GOVERNING LEGISLATION: SVMC 17.80.150 and 19.30.040 PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: None BACKGROUND: The intent of the proposed privately initiated text amendment is to allow recycling facilities in Corridor Mixed Use (CMU), Community Commercial (C), and Regional Commercial (RC) zones. Currently, the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) permits recycling in the Light Industrial (LI) and Heavy Industrial (HI) zones in conjunction with solid waste transfer sites. The applicant proposes to amend the SVMC to add a Recycle Facility to Section 19.120 Permitted and Accessory Uses; Sections 19.60.050 B, 19.60.060 B, 19.060.080 B of the Supplemental Permitted Use Regulations; and Appendix A, Definitions. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on October 27th to accept public testimony and deliberate on the proposed amendment. At the conclusion of the hearing, the Planning Commission voted 5-1 to recommend approval of the proposed amendment. OPTIONS: Consensus for staff to draft an ordinance for first reading, recommend minor changes, or remand substantial changes back to the Planning Commission for a future scheduled public hearing. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Consensus to proceed with first reading scheduled November 29, 2011 BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: None STAFF CONTACT: Mike Basinger, AICP, Senior Planner ATTACHMENTS: Staff Report Planning Commission Findings Draft Amendment PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO CHAPTER SVMC CHAPTER 19.60, CHAPTER 19.120, AND APPENDIX A DEFINITIONS Chapter 19.60 DISTRICT PURPOSE AND SUPPLEMENTAL USE REGULATIONS—COMMERCIAL, OFFICE AND MIXED USE ZONES 19.60.050 C, Community Commercial district. A. The Community Commercial classification designates areas for retail, service and office establishments intended to serve several neighborhoods. Community Commercial areas should not be larger than 15 to 17 acres in size and should be located as business clusters rather than arterial strip commercial development. Community Commercial centers may be designated through the adoption of the Comprehensive Plan, Comprehensive Plan amendments or through subarea planning. Residences in conjunction with business and/or multifamily developments may be allowed with performance standards that ensure compatibility. B. Supplemental Permitted Use Regulations. 1. Indoor kennels, doggie day care facilities and kennels associated with veterinarian clinics; provided, that: a. There are no outside runs or areas; b. The structure(s) housing animals is adequately soundproof to meet the requirements of Chapter 173-60 WAC; c. One parking stall provided for every 10 animal confinement areas; and d. Compliance with noise standards for a commercial noise source as identified by WAC 173-60-040 has been demonstrated by the applicant. 2. Wind turbine support tower provided the provisions of SVMC 19.40.110 are met. 3. All storage in the C district shall be within an enclosed building; provided, that retail products which are for sale or rental may be displayed outdoors during business hours only, so long as the storage does not occur within any required front or flanking street yard or in any public street or right-of-way.Vehicles, machinery or other items normally displayed for sales purposes on an open lot may be so displayed. No inoperable or not currently licensed vehicles or remnants thereof shall be stored or displayed out of doors. (Ord. 08-002 § 1, 2008; Ord. 07-015 §4, 2007). 4. Recycling facility; provided that: a. All recyclable materials and equipment must be contained indoors. b. All activities must meet the noise requirements of SVMC 7.05.040(L). c. When adjacent to an existing residential use or residential zone screening in SVMC 22.70.030(B) shall be required. Page 1 of 4 d. The site must have frontage on an existing arterial or state highway and access will be limited to such frontage. e. No dangerous or hazardous materials as defined in SVMC Appendix A shall be recycled or processed on site. 19.60.060 RC, Regional Commercial district. A. The Regional Commercial designation allows a large range of commercial and business uses. Community design guidelines address design quality, mixed use, and the integration of auto, pedestrian, and transit circulation. B. Supplemental Permitted Use Regulations. 1. Caretaker dwelling unit limited to custodial, maintenance, management or security of a commercial property. 2. All storage in the RC district shall be within an enclosed building or within an area screened by a Type 1 screen consistent with the provisions of SVMC 22.70.030; provided, that retail products which are for sale or rental may be displayed outdoors during business hours only, so long as the storage does not occur within any required front or flanking street yard or in any public street or right-of-way.Automobiles, recreational vehicles, machines and other items normally displayed for sales purposes on an open lot may be so displayed. 3. Indoor kennels, doggie day care facilities and kennels associated with veterinarian clinics; provided, that: a. There are no outside runs or areas; b. The structure(s) housing animals is adequately soundproof to meet the requirements of Chapter 173-060 WAC; c. One parking stall provided for every 10 animal confinement areas; and d. Compliance with noise standards for a commercial noise source as identified by WAC 173-60-040 has been demonstrated by the applicant. (Ord. 08-002 § 1, 2008; Ord. 07-015 §4, 2007). 4. Recycling facility; provided that: a. All recyclable materials and equipment must be contained indoors. b. All activities must meet the noise requirements of SVMC 7.05.040(L). c. When adjacent to an existing residential use or residential zone screening in SVMC 22.70.030(B) shall be required. d. The site must have frontage on an existing arterial or state highway and access will be limited to such frontage. e. No dangerous or hazardous materials as defined in SVMC Appendix A shall be recycled or processed on site. 19.60.080 CMU, Corridor Mixed Use district. Page 2 of 4 A. The Corridor Mixed Use designation is intended to enhance travel options, encourage development of locally serving commercial/retail uses, higher density residential, lodging and offices along major transportation corridors. B. Supplemental Permitted Use Regulations. 1. The outdoor storage provisions contained in SVMC 19.60.050(B)(3) shall apply to the CMU district. 2. Front and flanking street yard setbacks shall be 20 feet, except as otherwise provided. 3. Projects with residential components shall provide 210 square feet of open space per dwelling unit conforming to the requirements of SVMC 19.40.020(E) and eligible for reduction for improvements on the same basis; provided, that: a. The requirement does not apply to the development of less than 10 new dwelling units; and b. Additional open space is not required for residential development located within 1,300 feet of a public park. 4. Recycling facility; provided that: a. All recyclable materials and equipment must be contained indoors. b. All activities must meet the noise requirements of SVMC 7.05.040(L). c. When adjacent to an existing residential use or residential zone screening in SVMC 22.70.030(B) shall be required. d. The site must have frontage on an existing arterial or state highway and access will be limited to such frontage. e. No dangerous or hazardous materials as defined in SVMC Appendix A shall be recycled or processed on site. Chapter 19.120 PERMITTED AND ACCESSORY USES NAICS Schedule of Corridor Community Regional Light Heavy Permitted Uses Mixed Use Commercial Commercial Industrial Industrial Appendix 19-A 56292 Recycling Facility S S S P P Appendix A DEFINITIONS Page 3 of 4 Recycling Facility: A Facility that accepts recyclable materials and may perform some processing activities. The principle function is to separate and store materials that are ready for shipment to end- use markets,such as paper mills,aluminum smelters or plastic manufacturing plants. Processing activities may include baling,compacting,flattening,grinding, crushing, mechanical sorting, or cleaning. Page 4 of 4 \'' "TY"A"QSP°�"EV. Department of Community Development Planning Division Code Text Amendment CTA-04- 1 1 Recycling Facilities "TY"A"QSP°�"EV. Department of Community Development Planning Division PRME Chapter 19 . 60 Recycling facility; provided that: a. All recyclable materials and equipment must be contained indoors. b. All activities must meet the noise requirements of SVMC 7.05.040(L). c. When adjacent to an existing residential use or residential zone screening in SVMC 22.70.030(B) shall be required. d. The site must have frontage on an existing arterial or state highway and access will be limited to such frontage. e. No dangerous or hazardous materials as defined in SVMC Appendix A shall be recycled or processed on site. "TY"A"QSP°�"EV. Department of Community Development Planning Division Chapter 19 . 120 NAIC Schedule CMU C 56292 Recycling Facility S S S P P "TY"A"QSP°KA"EV. Department of Community Development Stiorkane Planning Division Definitions Recycling Facility: A Facility that accepts recyclable materials and may perform some processing activities. The principle function is to separate and store materials that are ready for shipment to end-use markets, such as paper mills, aluminum smelters or plastic manufacturing plants. Processing activities may include baling, compacting, flattening, grinding, crushing, mechanical sorting, or cleaning. Stiorkane \EN% "TY"A"QSP°�NEy. Department of Community Development Planning Division Cl Ie{ie•■ C Fudid•Art Tse4t•. ott•Kit Borkeye•AveJ �� ., nr •�tilaatgomerr•Ns ksmtr Knox-Ayc \\��\�• \�y ]Iirab t•�,� T 4n4 Ire i:u[hd•Atc 1t2asflcid.Mt 1 alleyway-Are as lmor+Founht:rsc ighth•r■c r Ia„hth•Are yeth-Arc 1lissioa Are U ssaoa Are I (4 x i �— . r' ' •Broadway•:1re 9 r, tl x Brosdaa}Are-4 z E t 1 i T : —[ Vallerxar Alve—I,alley ayAse a...`.7. c�� Sprntir Ate • Applcwav Bird \ti..ioa_fit e i Foa`nh.l▪re •Fourth•\tc E1_hrh ate • . se S obs_ .% e- �e it P1 I 4j \ 24th•Aye—s y`t jAse 2414 Are-2Jti Are i \1 FE ✓ S .� ad-Ave—c4 i 3:ad_ire '1 9 3 a Y se t\� (11 O okane S( 11707 E Sprague Ave Suite 106 ❑ Spokane Valley WA 99206 Valley 509.921.1000 Li Fax:509.921.1008 Li cityhall @spokanevalley.org Memorandum To: Mayor and City Council From: John Carroll,Chair-Spokane Valley Planning Commission Date: October 27,2011 Re: Planning Commission Findings and Recommendation: CTA-04-11 PROPOSAL The intent of the proposed privately initiated text amendment is to allow recycling facilities in Corridor Mixed Use (CMU), Community Commercial (C), and Regional Commercial (RC) zones. Currently, the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) permits recycling in the Light Industrial (LI) and Heavy Industrial (HI) zones in conjunction with solid waste transfer sites. The applicant proposes to amend the SVMC to add a Recycle Facility to Section 19.120 Permitted and Accessory Uses; Sections 19.60.050 B, 19.60.060 B, 19.060.080 B of the Supplemental Permitted Use Regulations; and Appendix A, Definitions. The Planning Commission's findings and recommendation on CTA-04-11 are summarized below: FINDINGS 1. Notice for the proposed amendment was placed in the Spokane Valley News Herald on October 7, 2011. 2. Pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA) an environmental checklist was required for the amendment. 3. Staff reviewed the environmental checklist and a threshold determination was made for the proposed amendment. An Optional Determination of Non-significance (DNS)was issued and published on October 7, 2011. 4. The Spokane Valley Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on October 27, 2011, to consider the proposed amendment. After hearing public testimony,the Commission made a recommendation on CTA-04-11. Section 17.80.150(F) of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) provides approval criteria that must be considered when the City amends the SVMC. Planning Commission Findings: 1. The Planning Commission finds the proposed privately initiated text amendment to be consistent with the applicable provisions of the Growth Management Act, Countywide Planning Policies (CWPP) and the City's Comprehensive Plan; 1 of 2 The City of Spokane Valley has adopted goals and policies consistent with the GMA and adopted CWPP. The Planning Commission finds the following goals and policies to be consistent with the proposed amendment. a. CFG-5: Promote the reduction, re-use and recycling of solid waste. b. TP-8.1: Use the City's transportation system and infrastructure to support desired land uses and development patterns. c. TP-8.2: Allow a variety of services within neighborhoods that are convenient to and meet the needs of neighborhood residents, decreasing the need for driving. d. EDP-6.1: Encourage the retention, development and recruitment of environmentally friendly businesses. 2. The Planning Commission finds the proposed amendment to bear a substantial relation to public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment; The Planning Commission finds the proposed amendment will provide a definition for a recycling facility, specifically addressing the use and limiting the processing of materials to separation. In addition, supplemental regulations will ensure all recyclable materials and equipment are contained in indoors and access will be limited to an existing arterial or state highway. Zoning districts permitting a recycling facility will be required to meet the following supplemental regulations: a. All recyclable materials and equipment must be contained indoors. b. All activities must meet the noise requirements of SVMC 7.05.040(L). c. When adjacent to an existing residential use or residential zone screening in SVMC 22.70.030(B) shall be required. d. The site must have frontage on an existing arterial or state highway and access will be limited to such frontage. e. No dangerous or hazardous materials as defined in SVMC Appendix A shall be recycled or processed on site. ADOPTION OF FINDINGS: The Planning Commission is required to adopt findings of fact when recommending changes to the Spokane Valley Municipal Code. At the conclusion of the hearing, the Planning Commission, by separate motion, adopted the findings of fact for CTA-04-11. Approved this 27th day of October, 2011 John Carroll, Chair City of Spokane Valley Planning Commission 2 of 2 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OS't PLANNING DIVISION CI'1S'OF pokane STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO THE Walley PLANNING COMMISSION CTA-04-11 RECYCLING FACILITY STAFF REPORT DATE:October 13, 2011 HEARING DATE AND LOCATION: October 27, 2011, beginning at 6:00 p.m., Spokane Valley City Hall Council Chambers, Valley Redwood Plaza Building, 11707 East Sprague Avenue, Suite 101, Spokane Valley, Washington 99206. PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: A privately initiated text amendment to the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) to add a Recycle Facility to Section 19.120 Permitted and Accessory Uses; Sections 19.60.050 B, 19.60.060 B, 19.060.080 B of the Supplemental Permitted Use Regulations; and Appendix A, Definitions. This proposal is considered a non-project action under RCW 43.21C. PROPOSAL LOCATION:The proposal affects the entire City of Spokane Valley, Washington. APPLICANT: Dwight J. Hume, 9101 N Mt.View Lane, Spokane, WA 99218 APPROVAL CRITERIA: Title 17 (General Provisions) and Title 21 (Environmental Controls) of the SVMC. SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Division recommends that the Planning Commission approve the proposed text amendment to the SVMC. STAFF PLANNER: Mike Basinger,AICP, Senior Planner, Community Development Department BACKGROUND INFORMATION A. APPLICATION PROCESSING Chapter 17.80 Permit Processing Procedures in the SVMC. The following summarizes key application procedures for the proposal. Application Submitted: September 2, 2011 Determination of Completeness: September 29, 2011 Issuance of an Optional Determination of Non-Significance (DNS): October 7, 2011 End of Appeal Period for DNS: November 4, 2011 Date of Published Notice of Public Hearing: October 7, 2011 Date of Mailed Notice of Public Hearing: October 7, 2011 B. SUMMARY OF TEXT AMENDMENTS II. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO SEPA Findings: Pursuant to SVMC Title 21 (Environmental Controls), the lead agency has determined that this proposal does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not Staff Report and Recommendation to the Planning Commission Page 1 of 4 required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Conclusion(s): The procedural requirements of the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) and SVMC Title 21 have been fulfilled by the applicant's submittal of the required SEPA Checklist, and the issuance of the City's threshold determination consisting of a DNS. III. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS A. COMPLIANCE WITH TITLE 17(GENERAL PROVISIONS)OF THE SPOKANE VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE Findings: SVMC Section 17.80.150(F) provides approval criteria that must be considered when the City amends the SVMC. 1. The proposed privately initiated text amendment is consistent with the general vision of the Comprehensive Plan; Staff Response: The principle purpose of the Comprehensive Plan is to provide goals and policies that guide development within the City of Spokane Valley based on the community's identified vision. Text amendments consistent with the goals and policies in the Comprehensive Plan should assist in the implementation of City's overall vision. When considering text amendments and how they relate to the goals and policies in the Comprehensive Plan it is important to examine all potentially relevant goals and policies, reconcile them, and then make a balanced decision consistent with overall vision. In this case, the Planning Commission must determine zoning districts that are most suitable for a recycling facility. The following goals and policies are generally related to the proposed amendment. A brief analysis is provided for Planning Commission consideration. TP-8.1: Use the City's transportation system and infrastructure to support desired land uses and development patterns. Analysis: The proposed amendment would limit truck traffic associated with a recycling facility to arterials and state highways. TP-8.2: Allow a variety of services within neighborhoods that are convenient to and meet the needs of neighborhood residents, decreasing the need for driving. Analysis: Allowing a recycling facility to be located in the suggested zones could provide residential neighborhoods convenient access to recycle reusable products. CFG-5: Promote the reduction, re-use and recycling of solid waste. Analysis: Allowing a recycling facility to be located in the suggested zones could promote recycling of reusable products. EDP-6.1: Encourage the retention, development and recruitment of environmentally friendly businesses. Staff Report and Recommendation to the Planning Commission Page 2 of 4 Analysis: Recycling can conserve the consumption of resources, energy and space used in landfills. The proposed amendment would allow a recycling facility to be located in a broader spectrum of zoning classifications potentially promoting the reuse of recyclable products. Based on the preceding goals, policies and analysis, the proposed text amendment is consistent with the overall vision of the City's adopted Comprehensive Plan. 2. The proposed amendment bears a substantial relation to public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment; Staff Response: The proposed amendment would permit recycling facilities in the Community Commercial, Regional Commercial and Corridor Mixed Use zoning districts. Currently, the SVMC categorizes recycling with solid waste transfer stations permitted in the Light Industrial and Heavy Industrial districts. The applicant requests that recycling facilities be addressed separately as a facilities that accept recyclable materials where the principle function would be to separate and store materials for shipment to end-use markets. The amendment would require all operations to be conducted within an enclosed building where noise and liter could be controlled to ensure land use compatibility. The amendment further stipulates that there must be direct access to an existing arterial or state highway. The proposed amendment can provide convenient access to a recycling facility. The public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment would be ensured by regulations currently in place in the SVMC and would be furthered by the conditions stipulating that the recycling facility activities be conducted indoors and that direct access would be limited to arterials or state highways. Conclusion(s): The proposed privately initiated text amendment to the SVMC is consistent with the approval criteria contained in the SVMC. IV. STAFF RECOMMENDATION The Planning Division, after review and consideration of the proposed privately initiated text amendment and applicable approval criteria, recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of CTA-04-11. V. PLANNING COMMISSION FINDINGS The Planning Commission is required to adopt findings of fact (Sections 17.80.140& 17.80.150)when recommending changes to the SVMC. At the conclusion of the hearing for the text amendment to the SVMC, the Planning Commission, by separate motion, should adopt findings of fact. Findings: Staff has prepared the following findings for the Planning Commission in the event there is concurrence with the recommended approval. SVMC Section 17.80.150(F) provides approval criteria that must be considered when the City amends the SVMC. Planning Commission Findings: 1. The Planning Commission finds the proposed privately initiated text amendment to be consistent with the applicable provisions of the City's Comprehensive Plan; Staff Report and Recommendation to the Planning Commission Page 3 of 4 The City of Spokane Valley has adopted goals and policies consistent with the GMA and adopted CWPP. The Planning Commission finds the following goals and policies to be consistent with the proposed amendment. a. CFG-5: Promote the reduction, re-use and recycling of solid waste. b. TP-8.1: Use the City's transportation system and infrastructure to support desired land uses and development patterns. c. TP-8.2: Allow a variety of services within neighborhoods that are convenient to and meet the needs of neighborhood residents, decreasing the need for driving. d. EDP-6.1: Encourage the retention, development and recruitment of environmentally friendly businesses. 2. The Planning Commission finds the proposed privately initiated text amendment to bear a substantial relation to public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment; The Planning Commission finds the proposed amendment will provide a definition for a recycling facility, specifically addressing the use and limiting the processing of materials to separation. In addition, supplemental regulations will ensure all recyclable materials and equipment are contained in indoors and access will be limited to an existing arterial or state highway. Zoning districts permitting a recycling facility will be required to meet the following supplemental regulations: a. All recyclable materials and equipment must be contained indoors. b. All activities must meet the noise requirements of SVMC 7.05.040(L). c. When adjacent to an existing residential use or residential zone screening in SVMC 22.70.030(B) shall be required. d. The site must have frontage on an existing arterial or state highway and access will be limited to such frontage. e. No dangerous or hazardous materials as defined in SVMC Appendix A shall be recycled or processed on site. Recommended Motion: The Planning Commission adopts the findings in the staff report and recommends approval of CTA-04-11, a text amendment to the SVMC, to add a Recycling Facility to Section 19.120 Permitted and Accessory Uses; Sections 19.60.050 B, 19.60.060 B, 19.060.080 B of the Supplemental Permitted Use Regulations; and Appendix A Definitions. Staff Report and Recommendation to the Planning Commission Page 4 of 4 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: November 15, 2011 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ® admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Acquisition of Brown's Park GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 35A.11.010; 35A.11.020 PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: None BACKGROUND: In 1977, Spokane County conveyed the southwest portion of Brown's Park (at the corner of South Pines Road and 32nd Avenue) to the Spokane Valley Fire Department. The deed expressly states that the purpose of the transfer is for use as a fire station and prohibits all other uses except parks and recreation. The deed also gave Spokane County (and the City as successor in interest) the right to use the property for parks and recreation purposes unless and until a fire station is built on the property. The Spokane Valley Fire Department built a fire station on 32nd Avenue, approximately one block from Brown's Park. No part of the Brown's Park lot is used as a fire station. The fire department does not plan to build a fire station on the Brown's Park lot in the future. Pursuant to the deed, the property must continue to be used for parks purposes. As successors in interest to Spokane County, the City can accept transfer of the title. On October 27, 2011, the fire department delivered a quitclaim deed to the City Clerk, signed by Chief Mike Thompson, transferring the property to the City of Spokane Valley. At our request, the deed contains a signature line for a City official to accept transfer of title. It is the desired practice of the City Attorney's Office to obtain Council's acceptance of a deed before accepting delivery of any non-right-of-way property to avoid title being put in the City's name on unwanted parcels of land. OPTIONS: RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Place on future agenda for motion to authorize City Manager to complete all tasks necessary to execute the transfer of the Spokane Valley Fire Department's interest in Brown's Park back to the City. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: None STAFF CONTACT: Kelly E. Konkright, Deputy City Attorney ATTACHMENTS: (1) 1977 Quit Claim Deed conveying property to Spokane Valley Fire Department; (2) Quit Claim Deed transferring subject property to City of Spokane Valley When Recorded Mail To: City of Spokane Valley Attn: City Clerk 11707 East Sprague Avenue Spokane Valley, WA 99206 QUIT CLAIM DEED GRANTOR: Spokane Valley Fire Department,fka Spokane County Fire Protection District#1 GRANTEE: City of Spokane Valley (Successors in Interest to Spokane County) LEGAL DESCRIPTION (Abbreviated): Assessor's Tax Parcel ID# ';. /. r.+ Reference Nos. of Documents Released or Assigned: The GRANTOR SPOKANE VALLEY FIRE DEPARTMENT, fka SPOKANE COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT #1, a municipal corporation, for valuable consideration mutually acknowledged by the parties, conveys and quit claims to the CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY (SUCCESSORS IN INTEREST TO SPOKANE COUNTY), a municipal corporation, all of its interests in the following described real estate, situated in the County of Spokane, State of Washington including any interest therein which grantor may hereafter acquire: The south 180 feet of the west 180 feet of the southwest 1/4 of the southwest 1/4 except for road rights-of-way, all located in Section 27, Township 25 North, Range 44 East, W.M.,Spokane County, Washington. Subject to all easements,restrictions and reservations of record. Dated: l ', _ ! ,2011. Mike Thompson,Chief Consented to by the City of Spokane Valley this day of ,2011 Mike Jackson,City Manager STATE OF WASHINGTON, ) ACKNOWLEDGMENT )ss. OF County of Spokane. ) MUNICIPAL CORPORATION I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that MIKE THOMPSON signed this instrument, on oath stated that he was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the Chief of SPOKANE VALLEY FIRE DEPARTMENT, a municipal corporation, to be the free and voluntary act of such corporation, for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument, CO _ SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO ME before me on f OOra5s 4 ,2011. • • Notary Public (I State of Washington PATRICIA L.ANDERSEN MY COMMISSION EXPIRES Notary Public in and for the State of February 18, 2012 Washington,Residing in__ :•;sz• ' My appointment expires ; -s�r' • Parcel Inforination Page 1 of 3 SPOKANE Col. rY • WASHINGTON Parcel IiIIortllatlotl Nevi Search J , Modify Search I [Sales Search _Help Summary I Seg\Merge I NoUcesSEven[s I Taxes I Parcel Photos I Sketch I Maps I Webplus I Web Viewer I Print Summary w/No Graphs All Data As Of: 10123!2014 Parcel Number: 45273.9036 ADVANCED MAP VIEWERS: SCIMAP 1� SIMPLIFIED MAP VIEWER: scouT OWNER INFORMATION Owner/Name Address 4 Ad less City State Zip Country R/le CITY OF SPOKANE 11707 E SPRAGUE AVE STE SPOKANE WA 99206 100 VALLEY 106 TAXPAYER INFORMATION j Address Role Taxpayer/Name Address 1 2 City State Zip Country o70 CITY OF SPOKANE 11707 E SPRAGUE AVE STE SPOKANE WA 99206 100 VALLEY 106 MORTGAGE INFORMATION SITE ADDRESS INFORMATION Parcel Address City Land Size Description Tax Tax Code Status Type Size Description Year Area Real 0 ADDRESS 67 09.00 Acre(s) 67 Service 2011 0144 Active UNKNOWN Governmental Assessor Description 27-25-44 S660FT OF W594FT OF S1/2 OF SW114:EXC THEREFROM CO RDS APPRAISAL INFORMATION Contact Parcel Class Appraiser Your Appraisal Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Appraiser Appraiser Appraiser Date Code Name Desc Name Phone Click here COMM 67 Service- to send a SOUTH Governmental 84 question 11/6/2008 524526 OPORD VALLEY Rich 477-5910 to the COMME appraiser Assessed Value Tax Year Land Dwelling/Structure Current Use Land Taxable Personal Prop Total Value 2012 784,080 0 0 0 0 784,080 http:Uwebpadal/ParcelSuinmary.aspx 10/24/201 1 Parcel Information Page 2 of 3 2011 784,080 0 0 0 0 784,080 2010 764,080 0 0 0 0 784,080 2009 294,030 0 0 0 0 294,030 2008 294,030 0 0 0 0 294,030 2007 294,030 0 0 0 0 294,030 2006 294,030 0 0 0 0 294,030 2005 294,030 0 0 0 0 294,030 TAX STATISTICS Levy Name Levy Rate 2010 Levy Rate 2011 Levy Type Tax ID County General 1.1556 1.1951 Non-Voted 0144 County General Cons Futures 0.0427 0.0442 Non-Voted 0144 County Library General 0.4467 0.5000 Non-Voted 0144 Fire District 01 1.5000 1.5000 Non-Voted 0144 Spokane Valley 1.5101 1.5030 Non-Voted 0144 Stale School 2.0024 2.2410 Nan-Voted 0144 Fire District 01 Special 1.6023 1.8573 Voted 0144 SD356 Cen Valley B&I 1.4799 1.5723 Voted 0144 SD356 Cen Valley General 2.8687 2.9185 Voted 0144 Totals: . 12.6086 13.1314 1 LEVY DISTRIBUTION 2011 1 li 1.20 County General 9.10, ii 0.04 County General Cons Futures 0.34 e • 1i 0.50 County Library General 3.81 - 1.50 Fire District 01 11.42 1 1.54 Spokane Valley 11.451'. :2.24 State School 17.07 1.66 Fire District 01 Special 12.62 e L.ol 1.57 30356 Cen Valley B81 11.97'/, , ... . .. !'.,,,: j -2.92 SD356 Cen Valley General 22.23% There was no data found for TCA Rates chart. CHARACTERISTICS Land Number Soil Id Acreage Sy Ft Frontage Depth Lot(s) Market Value Use Value 1 C015 0.00 392,040 0 0 0 784,080 0 UOM Field Book No Inspection Cycle Millage Rate Acre(s) 00207 RGE 1 5 13.13(398966841 l SALES INFORMATION Sale Date Sale Price Sale Instrument Excise Number 01/05/2004 0.00 Government Transfer 200400556 01/0512004 0.00 Government Transfer 200400558 Cl.ck here to view past safes prior to 1659. PROPERTY TAXES Active Exemptions Government Property Tax Year Charge Type Annual Charges Remaining Charges Owing http://webpadal ParcelSnintnary.aspx 10/24/2011 • Parcel 'Information Page 3 of 3 1 2011 Aquifer Principal AQFL1 30.00 0.00 2011 Slormwaler interest Spokane Valley 4.08 0.00 • 2011 Slormwater Principal Spokane Valley COM1 407.82 0.00 Sum 441.90 0.00 2010 Aquifer Principal AQFL1 30.00 0.00 2010 Stormwater Principal Spokane Valley COM1 407.82 0.00 Sum 437.82 0.00 2009 Aquifer Principal AQFL1 30.00 0.00 2009 Stormwater Principal Spokane Valley COM1 407.82 0.00 i Sum 437,82 0.00 I 2008 Aquifer Principal AQFL1 30.00 0.00 2008 Stormwater Interest Spokane Valley 12,23 0.00 • 2008 Stormwater Principal Spokane Valley COM1 407.82 0.00 Sum 450.05 0.00 Total 0.00 Spokane County Assessor's Office 1116 W.Broadway,Spokane,WA 99260 I Phone:509.477.3698 I Fax:509.477.3697 Hours:Monday-Thursday 8:30am-4:OOpm Friday 8:30am-1:00pm(excluding holidays) E-mail: assessoronspokanecounty.org Spokane County Treasurer's Office PO Box 199 Spokane,WA 99210-0199 I Phone:500.477.4713 I Fax:509.477.3674 -Hours:Monday-Thursday 8:30anm-4:00pm Friday 8•30am-1:00pm(excluding holidays) 1 E-mail: Treasurera(�spokanecounlv.org_ http://webpadal/ParcelSumtnary.aspx 10/24/2011 1P l � 9 1 "§1,,P;;;?rh',bAiy 'rMI;",`f`I19 • 11?;: a(A 7703240015 ,. & S0hi'oed � 'li111'„N lit P, )..1�'d'P! �S 3 WIIIM ei,Cst`ILAPtAip,,s!rsl'Ci1;c, slwiihH401fli Yet1;r11.. (� �< _. ,,x.30 QUIT CLAIM DEED ].016 ONB 137-d1; 99201 The GRANTOR, SPOKANE COUNTY.,fl a municipal corporation of the State of. Washington for and in consideration of .$10,00 and other further considerations conveys and quit claims to Spokane County Fire Protection District No. 1 the following described real estate,' situated. in the County of Spokane, State of Washington including any interest therein which Grantor may hereafter acquire: The south 180 feet of the west 180 feet of the south- west 1/4 of the southwest 1/4 except for road rights-of- way, all located in Section 27, Township 25 North, Range 44 East, W,M,, Spokane County, Washington SUBJECT to all easements, restrictions and reservations of record. It is expressly understood by the parties to this Deed. that this conveyance is further subject to the condition that the Grantor, Spokane County reserves the absolute and unrestricted right. to use the above described property for Spokane County Park and Recreation purposes until the Grantee, Spokane County Fire . Protection District No. 1 notifies the Grantor in writing that the Grantee will within six months from the date of notification construct a fire station on the above described property. The Grantor shall within 90 days of notification terminate any use conducted on said property. It is further understood by the parties to this Deed that this conveyance. is. further subject to the condition that should the Grantee, cease to use the property as a site for an active fire station, the Grantee may not thereafter use the property for any other purpose whatsoever other than for public park and recreation purposes. Any public park and recreation uses by. the Grantee shall not be in conflict nor be inconsistent with the use of any adjoining property owned by the Grantor. It is further understood by the parties to this Deed that this conveyance is further subject to the condition that the Grantor may use free of charge any parking facilities con- structed by the Grantee on the above property excepting those parking places specifically marked and designated for Fire Dis- trict vehicles only. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, said municipal corporation has caused this instrument to be executed by its proper officers and itu.-1Zrpor�.-te seal to be hereunto affixed this //c/ day of L::,! 1,, u t,. 1977. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 17„t1, E, rxoiso'6'm t:_:rvlg.,; OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON rt t 7 91'1 l .i 1 wea 11■.cl.1)la t!l.'f a )1?t J t N1 qt �: t� i 1, �,.2D a19 I111td fas.0,;03, ill gA 7r.,..�. �,., , • • CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: November 15, 2011 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ® admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Proposed Ordinance Amending SVMC 8.05.050(A) relating to the maximum term a person may serve as punishment for a gross misdemeanor. GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 9.92.020 PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: N/A BACKGROUND: In 2011, the Legislature amended RCW 9.92.020 to state that the maximum term a person may serve as punishment by imprisonment in jail for a gross misdemeanor is up to 364 days. Previous to that amendment, it stated that the maximum term a person may serve was not more than one year. The amendment became effective July 22, 2011. SVMC 8.05.050(A) currently reflects the old requirement of RCW 9.92.020 and states that the maximum term a person may serve as punishment by imprisonment in jail for a gross misdemeanor is not more than one year. As such, Staff recommends this amendment be adopted in order to be consistent with the amended version of RCW 9.92.020 to ensure compliance with State law. Staff views this as a housekeeping item. OPTIONS: 1) Proceed to a first reading; 2) Request that additional changes be made to the proposed Ordinance. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Council consensus to move forward with a first reading at a future council meeting. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: N/A STAFF CONTACT: Cary Driskell, City Attorney ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 - Proposed Ordinance DRAFT CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY SPOKANE COUNTY,WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WASHINGTON,AMENDING SECTION 8.05.050A OF THE SPOKANE VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO THE MAXIMUM TERM A PERSON MAY SERVE AS PUNISHMENT BY IMPRISONMENT FOR A GROSS MISDEMEANOR;AND OTHER MATTERS RELATING THERETO. WHEREAS, the City of Spokane Valley previously adopted Spokane Valley Municipal Code section 8.05.050A, which sets forth the maximum punishment for a person convicted of a gross misdemeanor;and WHEREAS,RCW 9.92.020 governs punishment for a gross misdemeanor at the state level; and WHEREAS, RCW 9.92.020 was amended in 2011 to state that the maximum term a person may serve as punishment by imprisonment in jail for a gross misdemeanor is up to 364 days;and WHEREAS, Spokane Valley Municipal Code section 8.05.050A states that the maximum term a person may serve as punishment by imprisonment in jail for a gross misdemeanor is not more than one year or by a fine in an amount not more than $5,000,or by both such imprisonment and fine;and WHEREAS, RCW 9.92.020 and Spokane Valley Municipal Code section 8.05.050A currently conflict; and WHEREAS,the existing provision should be amended to ensure compliance with State law. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley, Washington ordains as follows: Section 1. Amending Spokane Valley Municipal Code 8.05.050A Regarding Maximum Penalty Upon Conviction For Gross Misdemeanor. Spokane Valley Municipal Code section 8.05.050A is hereby amended as follows: A.Unless specifically provided otherwise, every person convicted of a gross misdemeanor, or a crime not otherwise classified, shall be punished by imprisonment in jail for a maximum term of up to 364 daysof not more thanone year, or by a fine in an amount of not more than $5,000, or by both such imprisonment and fine. Section 2. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance. Ordinance 11- Amending 8.05.050A Maximum Penalty,Gross Misdemeanor Page 1 of 2 DRAFT Section 3. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect five (5) days after publication of the Ordinance Summary. Passed this day of November, 2011. Mayor, Thomas E. Towey ATTEST: City Clerk, Christine Bainbridge Approved As To Form: Office of the City Attorney Date of Publication: Effective Date: Ordinance 11- Amending 8.05.050A Maximum Penalty,Gross Misdemeanor Page 2 of 2 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: November 15, 2011 Department Director Approval: ❑ Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ® admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Proposed Ordinance for Electric Lightwave, LLC Telecommunication Facilities Franchise GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 35A.47.040 PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: None. BACKGROUND: This agreement with Electric Lightwave, LLC grants a non-exclusive franchise to construct, maintain, and operate telecommunication facilities within the public rights-of-way of the City. Electric Lightwave currently has fiber optic cables in the ROW. This agreement grants a franchise for a period of 10 years, beginning on the effective date of this Ordinance, to install, construct, operate, maintain, replace and use all necessary equipment and facilities to place telecommunications facilities in, under, on, across, over, through, along or below the public rights-of-way and public places located in the City, as approved under City permits issued pursuant to this franchise. Similar to other franchises with private utility companies, the City collects no fee from this agreement. The City has superior right to the use of the rights-of-way. The cost of any new construction or maintenance of Electric Lightwave's facilities shall be solely Electric Lightwave's expense. The City requires Electric Lightwave to maintain insurance through the entire period of this agreement. The City has no previous agreement with Electric Lightwave. For reasons unknown to the City, the County never granted Electric Lightwave a franchise for the existing facilities. The City will need to publish a copy of a summary of the franchise in the newspaper prior to adoption, at Electric Lightwave's cost. Staff recommends approval of the proposed franchise. OPTIONS: The Council can approve the franchise, deny the franchise, or request changes. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Consensus to place an Ordinance authorizing execution of a telecommunication facilities franchise with Electric Lightwave on a future agenda for first reading. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: N/A STAFF CONTACT: Cary Driskell, City Attorney; Kelly Konkright, Deputy City Attorney ATTACHMENTS: Proposed franchise ordinance with Electric Lightwave, LLC. Draft telecommunications franchise CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY SPOKANE COUNTY,WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 11-*** AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON, GRANTING A NON-EXCLUSIVE FRANCHISE TO ELECTRIC LIGHTWAVE, LLC TO CONSTRUCT, MAINTAIN AND OPERATE TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, AND OTHER MATTERS RELATING THERETO. WHEREAS, RCW 35A.47.040 authorizes the City to grant, permit, and regulate "nonexclusive franchises for the use of public streets, bridges or other public ways, structures or places above or below the surface of the ground for railroads and other routes and facilities for public conveyances, for poles, conduits, tunnels, towers and structures, pipes and wires and appurtenances thereof for transmission and distribution of electrical energy, signals and other methods of communication, for gas, steam and liquid fuels, for water, sewer and other private and publicly owned and operated facilities for public service"; and WHEREAS, RCW 35A.47.040 further requires that "no ordinance or resolution granting any franchise in a code city for any purpose shall be adopted or passed by the city's legislative body on the day of its introduction nor for five days thereafter, nor at any other than a regular meeting nor without first being submitted to the city attorney, nor without having been granted by the approving vote of at least a majority of the entire legislative body, nor without being published at least once in a newspaper of general circulation in the city before becoming effective"; and WHEREAS, this Ordinance has been submitted to the city attorney prior to its passage; and WHEREAS, the Council finds that the grant of the Franchise contained in this Ordinance, subject to its terms and conditions, is in the best interests of the public, and protects the health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of this City. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley, Spokane County, Washington, ordains as follows: Section 1. Definitions. For the purpose of this Ordinance, the following words and terms shall have the meaning set forth below: 1. "City Manager"means the City Manager or designee. 2. "construction" or "construct" shall mean constructing, digging, excavating, laying, testing, operating, extending, upgrading, renewing, removing,replacing, and repairing a facility. Ordinance ,Electric Lightwave Franchise Page 1 of 16 Draft telecommunications franchise 3. "day" shall mean a 24-hour period beginning at 12:01 Alva. If a thing or act is to be done in less than seven days, intermediate Saturdays, Sundays and legal holidays shall be excluded in the computation of time. 4. "franchise area" shall mean the entire geographic area within the City as it is now constituted or may in the future be constituted. 5. "hazardous substances" shall have the same meaning as RCW 70.105D.020(10). 6. "maintenance, maintaining or maintain" shall mean the work involved in the replacement and/or repair of facilities, including constructing, relaying, repairing, replacing, examining, testing, inspecting, removing, digging and excavating, and restoring operations incidental thereto. 7. "permittee" shall mean a person or entity who has been granted a permit by the Permitting Authority. 8. "permitting authority" shall mean the City Manager or designee authorized to process and grant permits required to perform work in the rights-of-way. 9. "product" shall refer to the item, thing or use provided by the Grantee. 10. "public property" shall mean any real estate or any facility owned by the City. 11. "Public Works Director" shall mean the Spokane Valley Public Works Director or his/her designee. 12. "right-of-way" shall refer to the surface of and the space along, above, and below any street, road,highway, freeway, lane, sidewalk, alley, court, boulevard, parkway, drive, Grantee easement, and/or public way now or hereafter held or administered by the City. 13. "streets" or "highways" shall mean the surface of, and the space above and below, any public street,road, alley or highway,within the City used or intended to be used by the general public, to the extent the City has the right to allow the Grantee to use them. 14. "telecommunications facilities" shall mean any of the plant, equipment, fixtures, appurtenances, antennas, and other facilities necessary to furnish and deliver telecommunications services, including but not limited to poles with crossarms, poles without crossarms, wires, Ordinance ,Electric Lightwave Franchise Page 2 of 16 Draft telecommunications franchise lines, conduits, cables, communication and signal lines and equipment, braces, guys, anchors, vaults, and all attachments, appurtenances, and appliances necessary or incidental to the distribution and use of telecommunications services. The abandonment by Grantee of any telecommunications facilities as defined herein shall not act to remove the same from this definition. Section 2. Grant of Franchise. The City of Spokane Valley, a Washington municipal corporation (hereinafter the "City"), hereby grants unto Electric Lightwave, LLC (hereinafter "Grantee"), a Franchise for a period of 10 years, beginning on the effective date of this Ordinance, to install, construct, operate, maintain, replace and use all necessary equipment and facilities to place telecommunications facilities in, under, on, across, over, through, along or below the public rights-of-way and public places located in the City of Spokane Valley, as approved under City permits issued pursuant to this franchise (hereinafter the "franchise"). This franchise does not permit Grantee to use such facilities to provide cable services as defined by 47 C.F.R. § 76.5(ff). Section 3. Fee. No right-of-way use fee is imposed for the term of this franchise. Any such right-of-way use or franchise fee that may be imposed by subsequent ordinance would apply to any subsequent franchise, if any,between the parties. Section 4. City Use. The following provisions shall apply regarding City use. 1. Grantee agrees to reserve to the City the right to access four dark fiber strands (2 pair) along the route identified in Exhibit A as adopted or amended, within the boundaries of the City, for sole and exclusive municipal use or designation (the "City Reserved Fibers"). City agrees that it shall not use the City Reserved Fibers as a public utility provider of telecommunications business service to the public. 2. The City shall have the right to access by connection to the City Reserved Fibers at existing Grantee splice points or reasonably established access points within the City limits. The City shall provide at least 30 days written notice of intent to access the City Reserved Fibers. Upon any access or use of the City Reserved Fibers, City shall pay Grantee a recurring monthly charge of $20.00 per fiber pair per mile in use by the City (the "City Fiber Rate") unless otherwise specifically agreed by both the parties in writing and shall enter into Grantee's standard "Fiber License Agreement" which shall govern the terms and conditions for use of the City Reserved Fibers. Said recurring monthly charge shall not be imposed until such time as the fiber is put into use by the City. In the event the City Reserved Fibers are the last fibers remaining in Grantee's fiber bundle, then the following shall apply: A. If the City is using the fibers, then the rate the City shall pay Grantee will change from the City Fiber Rate to Grantee's standard commercial rate. Ordinance ,Electric Lightwave Franchise Page 3 of 16 Draft telecommunications franchise B. If the City is not using the fibers, the City shall have the option of abandoning the City Reserved Fibers in lieu of paying Grantee's standard commercial rate. 3. The City shall pay all costs associated with constructing any connection to the City Reserved Fibers. The City Reserved Fibers shall have a term that matches the duration of this Franchise Ordinance ("Reserved Fiber Term"). 4. Consistent with RCW 35.99.070, at such time when Grantee is constructing, relocating, or placing ducts or conduits in public rights-of-way, the Public Works Director may require Grantee to provide the City with additional duct or conduit and related structures, at incremental cost, necessary to access the conduit at mutually convenient locations. Any ducts or conduits provided by Grantee under this section shall only be used for City municipal purposes. A. The City shall not require that the additional duct or conduit space be connected to the access structures and vaults of the Grantee. B. This section shall not affect the provision of an institutional network by a cable television provider under federal law. C. Grantee shall notify the Public Works Director at least 14 days prior to opening a trench at any location to allow the City to exercise its options as provided herein. Section 5. Recovery of Costs. Grantee shall reimburse the City for all costs of one publication of this franchise in a local newspaper, and required legal notices prior to any public hearing regarding this franchise, contemporaneous with its acceptance of this franchise. Grantee shall be subject to all permit and inspection fees associated with activities undertaken through the authority granted in this franchise or under City Code. Grantee shall be subject to all permit and inspection fees associated with activities undertaken through the authority granted in this franchise or under City Code. Section 6. Non-Exclusivity. This franchise is granted upon the express condition that it shall not in any manner prevent the City from granting other or further franchises or permits in any rights-of-way. This and other franchises shall, in no way, prevent or prohibit the City from using any of its rights-of-way or affect its jurisdiction over them or any part of them. Section 7. Non-Interference with Existing Facilities. The City shall have prior and superior right to the use of its rights-of-way and public properties for installation and maintenance of its facilities and other governmental purposes. The City hereby retains full power to make all changes, relocations, repairs, maintenance, establishments, improvements, dedications or vacation of same as the City may deem fit, including the dedication, establishment, maintenance, and improvement of all new rights-of-way, streets, avenues, thoroughfares and other public properties of every type and description. Any and all such removal or replacement shall be at the sole expense of the Grantee, unless RCW 35.99.060 provides otherwise. Should Grantee fail to remove, adjust or relocate its telecommunications facilities by the date established by the Public Works Director's written notice to Grantee and in Ordinance ,Electric Lightwave Franchise Page 4 of 16 Draft telecommunications franchise accordance with RCW 35.99.060, the City may cause and/or effect such removal, adjustment or relocation, and the expense thereof shall be paid by Grantee. The owners of all utilities, public or private, installed in or on such public properties prior to the installation of the telecommunications facilities of the Grantee, shall have preference as to the positioning and location of such utilities so installed with respect to the Grantee. Such preference shall continue in the event of the necessity of relocating or changing the grade of any such public properties. Grantee's telecommunications facilities shall be constructed and maintained in such manner as not to interfere with any public use, or with any other pipes, wires, conduits or other facilities that may have been laid in the rights-of-way by or under the City's authority. If the work done under this franchise damages or interferes in any way with the public use or other facilities, the Grantee shall wholly and at its own expense make such provisions necessary to eliminate the interference or damage to the satisfaction of the Public Works Director. Section 8. Construction Standards. All work authorized and required hereunder shall comply with all generally applicable City Codes and regulations. Grantee shall also comply with all applicable federal and state regulations, laws and practices. Grantee is responsible for the supervision, condition, and quality of the work done, whether it is by itself or by contractors, assigns or agencies. Application of said federal, state, and City Codes and regulations shall be for the purposes of fulfilling the City's public trustee role in administering the primary use and purpose of public properties, and not for relieving the Grantee of any duty, obligation, or responsibility for the competent design, construction, maintenance, and operation of its telecommunications facilities. Grantee is responsible for the supervision, condition, and quality of the work done,whether it is by itself or by contractors, assigns or agencies. If Grantee shall at any time be required, or plan, to excavate trenches in any area covered by this franchise, the Grantee shall afford the City an opportunity to permit other franchisees and utilities to share such excavated trenches, provided that: (1) such joint use shall not unreasonably delay the work of the Grantee; and (2) such joint use shall not adversely affect Grantee's telecommunications facilities or safety thereof. Joint users will be required to contribute to the costs of excavation and filling on a pro-rata basis. Section 9. Protection of Monuments. Grantee shall comply with applicable state laws relating to protection of monuments. Section 10. Tree Trimming. The Grantee shall have the authority to conduct pruning and trimming for access to Grantee's telecommunications facilities in the rights-of-way subject to compliance with the City Code. All such trimming shall be done at the Grantee's sole cost and expense. Section 11. Emergency Response. The Grantee shall, within 30 days of the execution of this franchise, designate one or more responsible people and an emergency 24-hour on-call personnel and the procedures to be followed when responding to an emergency. After being Ordinance ,Electric Lightwave Franchise Page 5 of 16 Draft telecommunications franchise notified of an emergency, Grantee shall cooperate with the City to immediately respond with action to aid in the protection the health and safety of the public. In the event the Grantee refuses to promptly take the directed action or fails to fully comply with such direction, or if emergency conditions exist which require immediate action to prevent imminent injury or damages to persons or property, the City may take such actions as it believes are necessary to protect persons or property and the Grantee shall be responsible to reimburse the City for its costs and any expenses. Section 12. One-Call System. Pursuant to RCW 19.122, Grantee is responsible for becoming familiar with, and understanding, the provisions of Washington's One-Call statutes. Grantee shall comply with the terms and conditions set forth in the One-Call statutes. Section 13. Safety. All of Grantee's telecommunications facilities in the rights-of-way shall be constructed and maintained in a safe and operational condition. Grantee shall follow all safety codes and other applicable regulations in the installation, operation, and maintenance of the telecommunications facilities. Section 14. Movement of Grantee's Telecommunications Facilities for Others. Whenever any third party shall have obtained permission from the City to use any right—of-way for the purpose of moving any building or other oversized structure, Grantee, upon 14 days' written notice from the City, shall move, at the expense of the third party desiring to move the building or structure, any of Grantee's telecommunications facilities that may obstruct the movement thereof; provided, that the path for moving such building or structure is the path of least interference to Grantee's telecommunications facilities, as determined by the City. Upon good cause shown by Grantee, the City may require more than 14 days' notice to Grantee to move its telecommunications facilities. Section 15. Acquiring New Telecommunications Facilities. Upon Grantee's acquisition of any new telecommunications facilities in the rights-of-way, or upon any addition or annexation to the City of any area in which Grantee retains any such telecommunications facilities in the rights-of-way, the Grantee shall submit to the City a written statement describing all telecommunications facilities involved, whether authorized by franchise or any other form of prior right, and specifying the location of all such facilities. Such facilities shall immediately be subject to the terms of this franchise. Section 16. Dangerous Conditions - Authority of City to Abate. Whenever excavation, installation, construction, repair, maintenance, or relocation of telecommunications facilities authorized by this franchise has caused or contributed to a condition that substantially impairs the lateral support of the adjoining right-of-way, road, street or other public place, or endangers the public, adjoining public or private property or street utilities, the City may direct Grantee, at Grantee's sole expense, to take all necessary actions to protect the public and property. The City may require that such action be completed within a prescribed time. In the event that Grantee fails or refuses to promptly take the actions directed by the City, or fails to fully comply with such directions, or if emergency conditions exist which require Ordinance ,Electric Lightwave Franchise Page 6 of 16 Draft telecommunications franchise immediate action, the City may enter upon the property and take such actions as are necessary to protect the public, adjacent public or private property, or street utilities, or to maintain the lateral support thereof, and all other actions deemed by the City to be necessary to preserve the public safety and welfare; and Grantee shall be liable to the City for all costs and expenses thereof to the extent caused by Grantee. Section 17. Hazardous Substances. Grantee shall comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws, statutes, regulations and orders concerning hazardous substances relating to Grantee's telecommunications facilities in the rights—of-way. Grantee agrees to indemnify the City against any claims, costs, and expenses, of any kind, whether direct or indirect, incurred by the City arising out of the release or threat of release of hazardous substances caused by Grantee's ownership or operation of its telecommunications facilities within the City's right-of- way. Section 18. Environmental. Grantee shall comply with all environmental protection laws, rules, recommendations, and regulations of the United States and the State of Washington, and their various subdivisions and agencies as they presently exist or may hereafter be enacted, promulgated, or amended, and shall indemnify and hold the City harmless from any and all damages arising, or which may arise, or be caused by, or result from the failure of Grantee fully to comply with any such laws, rules, recommendations, or regulations, whether or not Grantee's acts or activities were intentional or unintentional. Grantee shall further indemnify the City against all losses, costs, and expenses (including legal expenses) which the City may incur as a result of the requirement of any government or governmental subdivision or agency to clean and/or remove any pollution caused or permitted by Grantee, whether said requirement is during the term of the franchise or subsequent to its termination. Section 19. Relocation of Telecommunications Facilities. Grantee agrees and covenants, at its sole cost and expense, to protect, support, temporarily disconnect, relocate or remove from any street any of its telecommunications facilities when so required by the City in accordance with the provisions of RCW 35.99.060, provided that Grantee shall in all such cases have the privilege to temporarily bypass, in the authorized portion of the same street upon approval by the City, any section of its telecommunications facilities required to be temporarily disconnected or removed. If the City determines that the project necessitates the relocation of Grantee's then- existing telecommunications facilities, the City shall: A. At least 60 days prior to the commencement of such improvement project, provide Grantee with written notice requiring such relocation; and B. Provide Grantee with copies of pertinent portions of the plans and specifications for such improvement project and a proposed location for Grantee's telecommunications facilities so that Grantee may relocate its telecommunications facilities in other City rights-of-way in order to accommodate such improvement proj ect. Ordinance ,Electric Lightwave Franchise Page 7 of 16 Draft telecommunications franchise C. After receipt of such notice and such plans and specification, Grantee shall complete relocation of its telecommunications facilities at no charge or expense to the City so as to accommodate the improvement project in accordance with RCW 35.99.060 (2). Grantee may, after receipt of written notice requesting a relocation of its telecommunications facilities, submit to the City written alternatives to such relocation. The City shall evaluate such alternatives and advise Grantee in writing if one or more of the alternatives are suitable to accommodate the work which would otherwise necessitate relocation of the telecommunications facilities. If so requested by the City, Grantee shall submit additional information to assist the City in making such evaluation. The City shall give each alternative proposed by Grantee full and fair consideration. In the event the City ultimately determines that there is no other reasonable alternative, Grantee shall relocate its telecommunications facilities as otherwise provided in this section. The provisions of this section shall in no manner preclude or restrict Grantee from making any arrangements it may deem appropriate when responding to a request for relocation of its telecommunications facilities by any person or entity other than the City, where the telecommunications facilities to be constructed by said person or entity are not or will not become City owned, operated or maintained facilities, provided that such arrangements do not unduly delay a City construction project. If the City or a contractor for the City is delayed at any time in the progress of the work by an act or neglect of the Grantee or those acting for or on behalf of Grantee, then Grantee shall indemnify, defend and hold the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers harmless from any and all claims, injuries, damages, losses or suits including attorneys' fees to the extent arising out of or in connection with such delays, except for delays and damages caused by the City. This provision may not be waived by the parties except in writing. Section 20. Abandonment of Grantee's Telecommunications Facilities. No telecommunications facilities constructed or owned by Grantee may be abandoned without the express written consent of the City. Section 21. Maps and Records Required. Grantee shall provide the City, at no cost to the City: 1. A route map that depicts the general location of the Grantee's telecommunications facilities placed in the rights-of-way. The route map shall identify telecommunications facilities as aerial or underground and is not required to depict cable types,number of fibers or cables, electronic equipment, and service lines to individual subscribers. The Grantee shall also provide an electronic format of the aerial/underground telecommunications facilities in relation to the right-of-way centerline reference to allow the City to add this information to the City's Geographic Information System ("GIS") program. The information in this subsection shall be delivered to the City by December 1, annually. Ordinance ,Electric Lightwave Franchise Page 8 of 16 Draft telecommunications franchise 2. In addition to subsection 1 of this section, the City may request that Grantee to provide the information described in subsection 1 of this section. To the extent such requests are limited to specific telecommunications facilities at a given location within the franchise area in connection with the construction of any City project, Grantee shall provide to the City, upon the City's reasonable request, copies of available drawings in use by Grantee showing the location of such telecommunications facilities. Grantee shall field locate its telecommunications facilities in order to facilitate design and planning of City improvement projects. 3. Upon written request of the City, Grantee shall provide the City with the most recent update available of any plan of potential improvements to its telecommunications facilities within the franchise area; provided, however, any such plan so submitted shall be deemed confidential and for informational purposes only, and shall not obligate Grantee to undertake any specific improvements within the franchise area. The information in this subsection shall be delivered to the City by December 1, annually. 4. In addition to the requirements of subsection 1 of this section, the parties agree to periodically share GIS files upon written request, provided Grantee's GIS files are to be used solely by the City for governmental purposes. Any files provided to Grantee shall be restricted to information required for Grantee's engineering needs for construction or maintenance of telecommunications facilities that are the subject of this franchise. Grantee is prohibited from selling any GIS information obtained from City to any third parties. 5. Public Disclosure Act. Grantee acknowledges that information submitted to the City may be subject to inspection and copying under the Washington Public Disclosure Act codified in RCW 42.56. Grantee shall mark as "PROPRIETARY/CONFIDENTIAL" each page or portion thereof of any documentation/information which it submits to the City and which it believes is exempt from public inspection or copying. The City agrees to timely provide the Grantee with a copy of any public disclosure request to inspect or copy documentation/information which the Grantee has provided to the City and marked as "PROPRIETARY/CONFIDENTIAL" prior to allowing any inspection and/or copying as well as provide the Grantee with a time frame, consistent with RCW 42.56.520, to provide the City with its written basis for non-disclosure of the requested documentation/information. In the event the City disagrees with the Grantee's basis for non-disclosure, the City agrees to withhold release of the requested documentation/information in dispute for a reasonable amount of time to allow Grantee an opportunity to file a legal action under RCW 42.56.540. Section 22. Limitation on Future Work. In the event that the City constructs a new street or reconstructs an existing street, the Grantee shall not be permitted to excavate such street except as set forth in the City's then-adopted regulations relating to street cuts and excavations. Section 23. Reservation of Rights by City. The City reserves the right to refuse any request for a permit to extend telecommunications facilities. Any such refusal shall be supported by a written statement from the Public Works Director that extending the telecommunications facilities, as proposed,would interfere with the public health, safety or welfare. Section 24. Remedies to Enforce Compliance. In addition to any other remedy Ordinance ,Electric Lightwave Franchise Page 9 of 16 Draft telecommunications franchise provided herein, the City reserves the right to pursue any remedy to compel or force Grantee and/or its successors and assigns to comply with the terms hereof, and the pursuit of any right or remedy by the City shall not prevent the City from thereafter declaring a forfeiture or revocation for breach of the conditions herein. Section 25. City Ordinances and Regulations. Nothing herein shall be deemed to direct or restrict the City's ability to adopt and enforce all necessary and appropriate ordinances regulating the performance of the conditions of this franchise, including any reasonable ordinances made in the exercise of its police powers in the interest of public safety and for the welfare of the public. The City shall have the authority at all times to control by appropriate regulations the location, elevation, and manner of construction and maintenance of any telecommunications facilities by Grantee, and Grantee shall promptly conform with all such regulations,unless compliance would cause Grantee to violate other requirements of law. In the event of a conflict between the Municipal Code and this franchise, City Code shall control. Section 26. Vacation. The City may vacate any City road, right-of-way or other City property which is subject to rights granted by this franchise in accordance with state and local law. Any relocation of telecommunications facilities resulting from a street vacation shall require a minimum of 180 days notice as provided for in section 37. Section 27. Indemnification. 1. Grantee hereby releases covenants not to bring suit and agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City, its officers, employees, agents and representatives from any and all claims, costs,judgments, awards or liability to any person arising from injury, sickness or death of any person or damage to property: A. For which the negligent acts or omissions of grantee, its agents, servants, officers or employees in performing the activities authorized by a franchise are the proximate cause; B. By virtue of grantee's exercise of the rights granted herein; C. By virtue of the City permitting grantee's use of the City's rights-of-ways or other public property; D. Based upon the City's inspection or lack of inspection of work performed by grantee, its agents and servants, officers or employees in connection with work authorized on the facility or property over which the City has control, pursuant to a franchise or pursuant to any other permit or approval issued in connection with a franchise; E. Arising as a result of the negligent acts or omissions of grantee, its agents, servants, officers or employees in barricading, instituting trench safety systems or Ordinance ,Electric Lightwave Franchise Page 10 of 16 Draft telecommunications franchise providing other adequate warnings of any excavation, construction or work upon the facility, in any right-of-way, or other public place in performance of work or services permitted under a franchise; or F. Based upon radio frequency emissions or radiation emitted from grantee's equipment located upon the facility,regardless of whether grantee's equipment complies with applicable federal statutes and/or FCC regulations related thereto. 2. Grantee's indemnification obligations pursuant to subsection 1 of this section shall include assuming potential liability for actions brought by grantee's own employees and the employees of grantee's agents,representatives, contractors and subcontractors even though grantee might be immune under RCW Title 51 from direct suit brought by such an employee. It is expressly agreed and understood that this assumption of potential liability for actions brought by the aforementioned employees is limited solely to claims against the City arising by virtue of grantee's exercise of the rights set forth in a franchise. The obligations of grantee under this subsection has been mutually negotiated by the parties, and grantee acknowledge that the City would not enter into a franchise without grantee's waiver. To the extent required to provide this indemnification and this indemnification only, grantee waives its immunity under RCW Title 51 as provided in RCW 4.24.115. 3. Inspection or acceptance by the City of any work performed by grantee at the time of completion of construction shall not be grounds for avoidance of any of these covenants of indemnification. Provided, that grantee has been given prompt written notice by the City of any such claim, said indemnification obligations shall extend to claims which are not reduced to a suit and any claims which may be compromised prior to the culmination of any litigation or the institution of any litigation. The City has the right to defend or participate in the defense of any such claim, and has the right to approve any settlement or other compromise of any such claim. 4. In the event that grantee refuses the tender of defense in any suit or any claim, said tender having been made pursuant to this section, and said refusal is subsequently determined by a court having jurisdiction (or such other tribunal that the parties shall agree to decide the matter), to have been a wrongful refusal on the part of grantee, then grantee shall pay all of the City's costs for defense of the action, including all reasonable expert witness fees,reasonable attorneys' fees, the reasonable costs of the City, and reasonable attorneys' fees of recovering under this subsection. 5. The obligations of grantee under the indemnification provisions of this section shall apply regardless of whether liability for damages arising out of bodily injury to persons or damages to property were caused or contributed to by the concurrent negligence of the City, its officers, agents, employees or contractors. The provisions of this section, however, are not to be construed to require the grantee to hold harmless, defend or indemnify the City as to any claim, demand, suit or action which arises out of the sole negligence of the City. In the event that a court of competent jurisdiction determines that a franchise is subject to the provisions of RCW 4.24.115, the parties agree that the indemnity provisions hereunder shall be deemed amended to conform to said statute and liability shall be allocated as provided herein. Ordinance ,Electric Lightwave Franchise Page 11 of 16 Draft telecommunications franchise 6. Notwithstanding any other provisions of this section, grantee assumes the risk of damage to its telecommunication facilities located in the rights-of-way and upon City-owned property from activities conducted by the City, its officers, agents, employees and contractors, except to the extent any such damage or destruction is caused by or arises from any willful or malicious action or gross negligence on the part of the City, its officers, agents, employees or contractors. Grantee releases and waives any and all such claims against the City, its officers, agents, employees or contractors. Grantee further agrees to indemnify, hold harmless and defend the City against any claims for damages, including, but not limited to, business interruption damages and lost profits, brought by or under users of grantee's facilities as the result of any interruption of service due to damage or destruction of grantee's facilities caused by or arising out of activities conducted by the City, its officers, agents, employees or contractors, except to the extent any such damage or destruction is caused by or arises from the sole negligence or any willful or malicious actions on the part of the City, its officers, agents, employees or contractors. 7. The provisions of this section shall survive the expiration, revocation or termination of this franchise. Section 28. Insurance. Grantee shall procure and maintain for the duration of the franchise, insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the exercise of the rights, privileges and authority granted hereunder to Grantee, its agents,representatives or employees. Applicant's maintenance of insurance as required by this franchise shall not be construed to limit the liability of the Grantee to the coverage provided by such insurance, or otherwise limit the City's recourse to any remedy available at law or in equity. 1. Automobile Liability insurance with limits no less than $1,000,000 Combined Single Limit per accident for bodily injury and property damage. This insurance shall cover all owned, non-owned, hired or leased vehicles used in relation to this franchise. Coverage shall be written on Insurance Services Office (ISO) form CA 00 01 or a substitute form providing equivalent liability coverage. If necessary, the policy shall be endorsed to provide contractual liability coverage; and 2. Commercial General Liability insurance shall be written on Insurance Services Office (ISO) occurrence form CG 00 01, or a substitute form providing equivalent liability coverage acceptable to the City, and shall cover products liability. The City shall be a named as an insured under the Applicant's Commercial General Liability insurance policy using ISO Additional Insured-State or Political Subdivisions-Permits CG 20 12 or a substitute endorsement acceptable to the City providing equivalent coverage. Coverage shall be written on an occurrence basis with limits no less than $1,000,000 Combined Single Limit per occurrence and $2,000,000 general aggregate for personal injury, bodily injury and property damage. Coverage shall include but not be limited to: blanket contractual; products/completed operations; broad form property; explosion, collapse and underground(XCU); and Employer's Liability. Ordinance ,Electric Lightwave Franchise Page 12 of 16 Draft telecommunications franchise The insurance policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions for Commercial General Liability insurance: 1. The Grantee's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance with respect to the City as outlined in the Indemnification section of this franchise. Any insurance, self-insurance, or insurance pool coverage maintained by the City shall be in excess of the Grantee's insurance and shall not contribute with it. 2. The Grantee's insurance shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be cancelled, except after thirty (30) days prior written notice has been given to the City. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best rating of not less than A:VII. Grantee shall furnish the City with original certificates and a copy of any amendatory endorsements, including the additional insured endorsement, evidencing the insurance requirements of the Grantee prior to the adoption of this Ordinance. Any failure to comply with the reporting provisions of the policies required herein shall not affect coverage provided to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers. Section 29. Performance Bond Relating to Construction Activity. Before undertaking any of the work, installation, improvements, construction, repair, relocation or maintenance authorized by this franchise, Grantee, or any parties Grantee contracts with to perform labor in the performance of this franchise, shall, upon the request of the City, furnish a bond executed by Grantee or Grantee's contractors and a corporate surety authorized to operate a surety business in the State of Washington, in such sum as may be set and approved by the City, not to exceed twenty-five thousand dollars, as sufficient to ensure performance of Grantee's obligations under this franchise. The bond shall be conditioned so that Grantee shall observe all the covenants, terms and conditions and shall faithfully perform all of the obligations of this franchise, and to repair or replace any defective work or materials discovered in the City's road, streets, or property. Said bond shall remain in effect for the life of this franchise. In the event Grantee proposes to construct a project for which the above-mentioned bond would not ensure performance of Grantee's obligations under this franchise, the City is entitled to require such larger bond as may be appropriate under the circumstances. Section 30. Modification. The City and Grantee hereby reserve the right to alter, amend or modify the terms and conditions of this franchise upon written agreement of both parties to such alteration, amendment or modification. Section 31. Forfeiture and Revocation. If Grantee willfully violates or fails to comply with any of the provisions of this franchise, or through willful or unreasonable negligence fails to heed or comply with any notice given Grantee by the City under the provisions of this franchise, and an adequate opportunity to cure the violation or non-compliance has been given in writing to Grantee, then Grantee shall, at the election of the City, forfeit all rights conferred hereunder and Ordinance ,Electric Lightwave Franchise Page 13 of 16 Draft telecommunications franchise this franchise may be revoked or annulled by the City after a hearing held upon reasonable notice to Grantee. The City may elect, in lieu of the above and without any prejudice to any of its other legal rights and remedies, to obtain an order from the Spokane County Superior Court compelling Grantee to comply with the provisions of this franchise and to recover damages and costs incurred by the City by reason of Grantee's failure to comply. Section 32. Assignment. This franchise may not be assigned or transferred without the written approval of the City, except that Grantee can assign this franchise without approval of, but upon notice to the City to, any parent, affiliate or subsidiary of Grantee or to any entity that acquires all or substantially all the assets or equity of Grantee,by merger, sale, consolidation or otherwise. Section 33. Acceptance. Not later than 60 days after passage of this Ordinance, the Grantee must accept the franchise herein by filing with the City Clerk an unconditional written acceptance thereof. Failure of Grantee to so accept this franchise within said period of time shall be deemed a rejection thereof by Grantee, and the rights and privileges herein granted shall, after the expiration of the 60-day period, absolutely cease, unless the time period is extended by ordinance duly passed for that purpose. Section 34. Survival. All of the provisions, conditions and requirements of sections: 5, 6, 7, 13, 16, 17, 18, 27, 28, 29, 37 and 38 of this franchise shall be in addition to any and all other obligations and liabilities Grantee may have to the City at common law, by statute, by ordinance, or by contract, and shall survive termination of this franchise, and any renewals or extensions hereof. All of the provisions, conditions, regulations and requirements contained in this franchise shall further be binding upon the heirs, successors, executors, administrators, legal representatives and assigns of Grantee and City and all privileges, as well as all obligations and liabilities of Grantee shall inure to their respective heirs, successors and assigns equally as if they were specifically mentioned herein. Section 35. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance. In the event that any of the provisions of the franchise are held to be invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, the City reserves the right to reconsider the grant of the franchise and may amend, repeal, add, replace or modify any other provision of the franchise, or may terminate the franchise. Section 36. Renewal. Application for extension or renewal of the term of this franchise shall be made no later than 180 days of the expiration thereof. In the event the time period granted by this franchise expires without being renewed by the City, the terms and conditions hereof shall continue in effect until this franchise is either renewed or terminated by the City. Section 37. Notice. Any notice or information required or permitted to be given by or to the parties under this franchise may be sent to the following addresses unless otherwise specified, in writing: Ordinance ,Electric Lightwave Franchise Page 14 of 16 Draft telecommunications franchise The City: City of Spokane Valley Attn: City Clerk 11707 E. Sprague, Suite 106 Spokane Valley,WA 99206 Grantee: Electric Lightwave, LLC Attn: Department of Law& Policy, 1201 NE Lloyd Blvd., Ste 500 Portland, Oregon 97232 Phone: 503-453-8000 Facsimile: 503-453-8223 Section 38. Choice of Law. Any litigation between the City and Grantee arising under or regarding this franchise shall occur, if in the state courts, in the Spokane County Superior Court, and if in the federal courts, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington. Section 39. Non-Waiver. The City shall be vested with the power and authority to reasonably regulate the exercise of the privileges permitted by this franchise in the public interest. Grantee shall not be relieved of its obligations to comply with any of the provisions of this franchise by reason of any failure of the City to enforce prompt compliance, nor does the City waive or limit any of its rights under this franchise by reason of such failure or neglect. Section 40. Entire Agreement. This franchise constitutes the entire understanding and agreement between the parties as to the subject matter herein and no other agreements or understandings, written or otherwise, shall be binding upon the parties upon execution and acceptance hereof. This franchise shall also supersede and cancel any previous right or claim of Grantee to occupy the City roads as herein described. Section 41. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect five days after publication of the Ordinance or a summary thereof occurs in the official newspaper of the City of Spokane Valley as provided by law. PASSED by the City Council this day of , 201_ Mayor, Thomas E. Towey ATTEST: Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Ordinance ,Electric Lightwave Franchise Page 15 of 16 Draft telecommunications franchise Approved as to Form: Office of the City Attorney Date of Publication: Effective Date: Accepted by Electric Lightwave, LLC: By: The Grantee, Electric Lightwave, LLC, for itself, and for its successors and assigns, does accept all of the terms and conditions of the foregoing franchise. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, has signed this day of , 201_ Subscribed and sworn before me this day of , 201_. Notary Public in and for the State of residing in My commission expires Ordinance ,Electric Lightwave Franchise Page 16 of 16 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: November 15, 2011 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information X admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Review of Local Government Revenue Sharing Reductions Proposed by Governor Gregoire. GOVERNING LEGISLATION: State budget law. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: None. BACKGROUND: Over several consecutive years, the State of Washington has experienced a shortfall in revenues necessary to maintain allowed service levels in adopted bi-annual budgets. With the prospect of another dismal State revenue projection due to be delivered in November 2011, Governor Gregoire has prepared a document titled "Budget Reduction Alternatives" that provides a list of proposed State budget program reductions. Also included in that report is a section titled "Local Government Revenue Sharing" in which the Governor has listed potential State shared revenue reductions for cities and counties. With money saved by reducing the shared revenues, the State would be able to shore up their own budget. The City of Spokane Valley's 2012 Budget anticipates it will receive $1,825,300 in direct shared revenues from the State including: • Liquor Board Profits $557,800 • Streamlined Sales Tax Mitigation $560,000 • Liquor Excise Tax $451,400 • Criminal Justice Assistance $246,100 The options being considered by the Governor include a variety of both implementation date and percentage reduction alternatives, with: • Implementation dates ranging from beginning as early as January 2012 for some, but not later than July 1, 2012, and • Percentage reductions ranging from as little as 5% to 100%. Attached is a one-page worksheet that lists all Local Government Revenue Sharing reduction options recommended by the Governor, as well as an attempt to compute what the potential revenue losses would be for the City of Spokane Valley if approved by the Legislature. OPTIONS: Closely monitor the State's budget discussions. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: No action is required at this time. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: At risk is a portion of State Shared revenues estimated to be $1,825,300 in the City's 2012 Budget. STAFF CONTACT:Mark Calhoun, Finance Dir; Morgan Koudelka, Senior Administrative Analyst ATTACHMENTS: o City Estimate of Potential 2012 Revenue Losses o Memorandum from Senior Administrative Analyst Morgan Koudelka re Potential Impacts o Budget Reduction Alternatives prepared by Office of the Governor C:\Users\cbainbridge\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\ESKUOKB5\Gov Gregoire rev share reductions CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 11/1/2011 Estimate of Potential 2012 Revenue Losses Resulting from Governor Gregoire's Budget Reduction Alternatives Currently in COSY 2012 Budget Percent Reduction and Implementation Date 100% 2/1/2012 100% 7/1/2012 25% 7/1/2012 20% 7/1/2012 10% 7/1/2012 5% 7/1/2012 1 Eliminate liquor profits 557,800 557,800 8,900 n/a n/a 55,800 n/a 2 Eliminate county criminal justice assistance 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 Eliminate streamlined sales tax mitigation 560,000 560,000 n/a 140,000 n/a n/a n/a 4 Eliminate liquor excise tax sharing 451,400 451,400 225,700 n/a n/a 45,200 n/a 5 Eliminate rural economic development sales tax credit 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 Eliminate local public health MVET backfill 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 Eliminate annexation sales tax credit 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 Eliminate city criminal justice assistance 246,100 246,100 n/a n/a n/a n/a 12,300 9 Eliminate distressed city and county assistance 10,000 n/a n/a n/a 2,000 n/a n/a 10 Eliminate state portion of county prosecuting attorney salaries 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 Reduce funding for Criminal Justice Training Commission 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 Eliminate Rural County Drug Task Force funding 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,825,300 Indicates that Governor Gregoire has tentatively chosen to include the item in her 2012 supplemental budget proposal in November. Spokane Valley 11707 E Sprague Ave Suite 106 • Spokane Valley WA 99206 509.921.1000 • Fax: 509.921.1008 • cityhall@spokanevalley.org Memorandum To: Mike Jackson, City Manager Members of Council From: Morgan Koudelka, Senior Administrative Analyst Date: November 15, 2011 Re: State Budget Reductions Potential Impact Summary The Washington State Governor has proposed state budget reductions that will be considered by the legislature. Many of those proposed reductions could have a potential financial impact on public safety services provided for the City by Spokane County. Not all impacts are known at this time. Staff will continue to monitor these reductions and provide updated information as it becomes available. Following is a list of proposed reductions that are public-safety related and known impacts. (*) Indicates that Governor Gregoire has tentatively chosen to include the item in her 2012 supplemental budget proposal in November. 1. Charge fee to local governments for use of State Crime Lab $4.5 million (effective July 1, 2012) (*) Requires local governments to pay a fee for crime lab services related to non-violent crimes now offered at no cost. Impact — The Spokane Valley Police Department uses the state crime lab significantly for non-violent crimes such as burglary and drug-related offenses. At this point the Police Department has been unable to determine from the state what fees will be charged. 2. Reduce funding for the Criminal Justice Training Commission $1.5 million by 10 percent(effective July 1,2012) Cuts state funding for the commission, which provides training and certification for all law enforcement officers in Washington State, except the State Patrol. Ninety-five percent of the individuals trained are city, county and tribal peace and corrections officers, while a small number are state enforcement, corrections and peace officers. Alternative: Require 50 percent contribution $3.3 million Impact — Local agencies are currently charged $3,070 for the police academy. If local agencies were required to pay 50% of the cost, the charge would be $7,537. The Spokane Valley Police Department has been hiring lateral entry officers that do not need to attend the academy and it has been a significant amount of time since a new officer was sent to the Academy. State Budget Reductions Impact November 15,2011 Page 2 of 2 3. Eliminate State Drug Task Force (*) $808,000 Ends state funding for the Multi Jurisdictional Narcotics Drug Task Force,which will cause closure of seven of 19 local task forces. In fiscal year 2009, this program helped dismantle 170 criminal organizations. Other funding is available. Impact: The Police Department has been unable to determine if Spokane is one of the seven task forces identified for closure. If Spokane is on the list we would lose one State Patrol Sergeant but the regional task force would continue. 4. Eliminate sexual assault formula grants $9.5 million Terminates state funds for grants to the 39 community programs that deliver prevention and treatment services to victims of sexual assault. Annually, more than 85,000 individuals are served. Programs take in about 10,000 new clients, 57 percent of whom are children. Alternative: Reduce grants by 20 percent(*) $3.0 million Impact Unknown 5. Eliminate victim witness support$1.8 million Ends grants to victim witness programs in each of the 39 county prosecutor offices. Annually, the programs assist 43,000 crime victims and witnesses in pursuing prosecution. Alternative: Reduce grants by 20 percent(*) $570,000 Impact - Unknown 6. Eliminate grants for domestic violence legal advocacy$1.4 million Terminates grants to 48 community-based, domestic violence prevention programs that assist with protection orders and divorce and separation papers. In fiscal year 2011, nearly 5,680 individuals were served. Alternative: Reduce grants by 20 percent(*) $564,000 Impact - Unknown 7. Eliminate state portion of county prosecuting attorneys salaries $2.9 million (effective July 1,2012) Ends state contribution to county prosecuting attorney salaries. In 2008, the Legislature tied the salary of the prosecuting attorneys to those of superior court judges, and agreed to cover half the cost of prosecuting attorney salaries. Impact—The increase in cost to the City is estimated to be $2,500 per year. k :::" Budget Reduction Alternatives Office of the Governor October 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS Education 1 Social and Human Services 4 Health Services 11 Public Safety 14 Natural Resources 16 General Government 19 Employee Compensation 23 Local Government Revenue Sharing 24 General Fund Reduction Alternatives 27 IN THE NARRATIVES THAT FOLLOW: (*) Indicates that Governor Gregoire has tentatively chosen to include the item in her 2012 supplemental budget proposal in November. ALSO NOTE: ■ Many items will require notice to clients or providers. ■ Many items will require legislation. ■ Impact descriptions, dollar amounts and effective dates are preliminary and subject to revision due to caseload forecast changes and other adjustments. Numbers have been rounded and may not exactly match numbers in the listing of General Fund Reduction Alternatives beginning on page 27. ■ Unless otherwise noted, all dollar amounts are General Fund-State. ■ Dates for eliminations and reductions in services vary. Dates may vary for elimination and an alternative reduction, too, for the same program or service. Budget Reduction Alternatives October 2011 EDUCATION DEPARTMENT OF EARLY LEARNING Reduce preschool enrollment by 25 percent $14.0 million Cuts ECEAP (Early Childhood Education and Assistance Program) services for all 3-year-olds except those necessary to maintain viable classrooms with 4-year-olds,plus 1,157 (17 percent) of 4-year-olds, for a total of 2,223 fewer enrollments. Alternative: Reduce enrollment by 11 percent $6.0 million Cuts ECEAP services to all eligible 3-year-olds, except where needed to maintain a viable classroom (loss of 1,065 preschool enrollments). Reduce seasonal child care administration (*) $2.1 million Eliminates state funding through nonprofits to administer child care subsidies for seasonal agricultural workers. Maintains federal funds,which may not be used for children of undocumented seasonal workers. Eliminate state funding for Child Care Resource and Referral program (*) $1.3 million Terminates state funding to provide child care resource information to parents. As federal funds are the predominant funding source,the state cut will reduce services by 11 percent. Reduce administration (*) $950,000 OFFICE OF SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION Delay June 30, 2013, apportionment payment to July 1, 2013 (*) $330.0 million Extra day moves payment to the next biennium,which will not change total state payments to school districts for the 2012-13 school year. Eliminate state levy equalization payments to school districts $300.0 million with higher school property tax rates Ends equalization funds to all eligible districts. Some districts could make up for some or all of the reduction by seeking to increase their local voter-approved levies; others will not be able to. Alternative: Reduce levy equalization payments by 50 percent (*) $150.0 million Alternative: Reduce levy equalization payments by 25 percent $75.0 million Alternative: Reduce levy equalization payments by 10 percent $30.0 million Eliminate school bus transportation $220.0 million Shifts responsibility for transporting students to parents and communities through local transit systems, beginning in the 2012-13 school year. Maintains required transportation for eligible children with disabilities. 1 Budget Reduction Alternatives October 2011 Increase class size by two students in grades 4-12 (*) $137.0 million Boosts class size ratios of students to teacher as follows:grades 4-6: from 27 to 29;grades 7-8: from 28.5 to 30.5;and grades 9-12: from 28.7 to 30.7. Will result in fewer teachers,thus increasing class sizes. Reduce school year by one week—from 180 to 175 days $125.0 million Reduces length of school year by 3 percent. Offsets the loss of instructional time by reducing or eliminating non-instructional activities. Shift bus depreciation payment from October to August (*) $49.0 million Delays state payments to school districts for bus replacement by 10 months. Eliminate National Board certification bonuses $40.0 million Ends annual bonuses to 5,800 teachers certified by the National Board,including additional bonuses for Board-certified teachers working in challenging schools. Alternative: Reduce National Board certification bonuses (*) $8.4 million Reduces bonuses from$5,000 to $4,000. Eliminate full-day kindergarten $38.0 million Terminates full-day kindergarten classes for 16,900 students in high poverty schools. Base school funding on an average daily attendance calculation $33.0 million Reduces state allocations to schools by basing funding on daily attendance instead of monthly enrollment. Alternative: Revise state attendance policy (*) $6.4 million Changes policy that considers a student withdrawn after he/she is absent unexcused for 20 consecutive days. Five,not 20 days will more accurately account for students who have dropped out of school and for whom the state continues to provide funding to the school district. Eliminate or reduce small grants and projects (*) $9.0 million Terminates a number of grants and projects administered through OSPI: Promoting Actual Student Success (PASS),Readiness to Learn,Beginning Educator Support Team (BEST), principal and superintendent internships, career and technical education start-up grants,Building Bridges, STEM Lighthouses, nonviolence training and Jobs for America's Graduates (JAG). Cuts by 20 percent LASER,Washington Reading Corps,Leadership Academy, College Readiness, Achievers Scholars and IT Academy. Reduce staffing for small high schools (*) $5.0 million Shrinks staffing formula for high schools serving fewer than 300 full-time students from minimum of nine full-time teachers to a minimum of eight. Reduce administration by 10 percent (*) $600,000 2 Budget Reduction Alternatives October 2011 SCHOOL FOR THE BLIND AND CENTER FOR CHILDHOOD DEAFNESS AND HEARING LOSS Reduce state support for the school and the center $1.4 million Cuts budgets for each by 10 percent, starting in the 2012-13 school year. Alternative: Reduce each by 5 percent (*) $711,000 HIGHER EDUCATION Eliminate State Need Grant financial aid to students $303.0 million Ends the state's largest financial aid program,which provides grants to 70,000 low-income students. Alternative: Reduce maximum State Need Grant award $68.4 million by 25 percent Cuts State Need Grant to all eligible students, resulting in a maximum award amount of $8,159 instead of$10,879. Alternative: Limit State Need Grant eligibility to public institutions $30.6 million Makes students attending private colleges and universities ineligible. Alternative: Reduce State Need Grant eligibility to 55 percent $25.5 million of median family income Reduces eligibility to those students with family incomes at or below 55 percent of the state median family income ($45,000 per year for a family of four). Reduce state support to colleges and universities by 20 percent $222.0 million Cuts General Fund-State support to the six public colleges and universities,and 34 community and technical colleges in the second year of the biennium. Alternative: Reduce by 15 percent (*) $166.0 million Alternative: Reduce by 10 percent $111.0 million Suspend State Work Study program (*) $8.0 million Cuts aid to 7,600 students at public and private colleges and universities beginning fall term 2012. 3 Budget Reduction Alternatives October 2011 SOCIAL AND HUMAN SERVICES CHILDREN'S ADMINISTRATION Maximize federal funding (*) $14.5 million Identifies adoption-and foster care-related costs that can be covered with federal funds. The state provides adoption and foster care services to about 24,000 children monthly. Reduce use and rates of contracted services (*) $13.0 million Cuts the number of placements in group homes and reduces fees paid to child placement agencies. Prevents overpayments to improve program accountability. Eliminate state funds for domestic violence programs $9.4 million Terminates state funds for domestic violence shelters that serve about 16,700 individuals annually. Retains funding for non-shelter services. Alternative: Reduce by 10 percent (*) $946,000 Increase client-to-social worker ratio (*) $8.2 million Changes the average ratio of children to social worker.Affects only those social workers, associated supervisors and support staff employed in child welfare. Does not reduce the number of social workers in Child Protective Services. Eliminate child welfare programs (*) $7.3 million Terminates specialized child welfare programs such as receiving care centers, continuum of care, sex abuse recognition training, children's advocacy centers, educational coordinators, foster care assessment, adoption support recruitment and street youth. Approximately 5,700 children receive these services annually. Reduce services (*) $4.7 million Reduces the Pediatric Interim Care Center, foster parent child care and support services, receiving care services,maintenance overpayments, evaluation and treatment, sexually aggressive youth services, family preservation training and the responsible living skills program for adolescents. Eliminate family reconciliation services (*) $4.7 million Stops intake and referral services aimed at keeping families intact and promoting positive behaviors for about 525 families who seek assistance each year. Reduce foster care length-of-stay(*) $876,000 Shortens the length of stay for 200 hard-to-place foster children now in care. 4 Budget Reduction Alternatives October 2011 CHEMICAL DEPENDENCY Reduce chemical dependency services (*) $14.5 million Reduces out-patient and detoxification chemical dependency services for 11,000 low-income clients. Eliminate Disability Lifeline and ADATSA (*) $5.2 million Terminates the Disability Lifeline and ADATSA (Alcohol and Drug Abuse Treatment and Services Act) medical programs,affecting 15,000 clients who receive chemical dependency services. Eliminate long-term residential and recovery house services (*) $2.7 million Ends funding for long-term residential services in excess of 90 days for 223 clients who are chronically chemically dependent or disabled. Terminates funding for five recovery houses,which serve 299 clients after they have finished their residential treatment program. Close Pioneer Center East (*) $2.1 million Halts funding for this Spokane chemical dependency treatment facility that annually serves 283 acute-care clients. Convert funding to county block grant (*) $2.1 million Introduces flexibility for funding chemical dependency services,which will be distributed to counties in a block grant to maximize the efficient and flexible use of resources. Capture Criminal Justice Treatment Account underexpenditure (*) $2.1 million Uses underspent Criminal Justice Treatment Account funds to offset state chemical dependency costs for drug courts. Limit detoxification visits (*) $1.9 million Reduces the number of admissions to two per year,which will eliminate 2,020 visits annually. Limit chemical dependency assessments (*) $188,000 Reduces the number of assessments to two per year,which will eliminate 251 assessments annually. DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES AND LONG-TERM CARE Change eligibility requirements $204.3 million Raises eligibility requirements and eliminates services for 25,000 developmentally disabled and elderly clients who now receive services ranging from in-home assistance with eating, bathing, medication management and toileting,to extensive hands-on assistance in a nursing home. Alternative: Reduce eligibility for services (*) $35.0 million Changes the eligibility for Medicaid personal care, nursing facility services and residential habilitation institutional services. Eliminates services for 5,000 elderly clients and 800 individuals with developmental disabilities. 5 Budget Reduction Alternatives October 2011 Eliminate health care insurance for home care providers $74.4 million Terminates health care insurance for agency providers and individual providers,who assist individuals with developmental disabilities and in long-term care with activities of daily living. This affects 12,000 agency providers and 32,600 individual providers. Create a new provider classification $59.9 million Creates a third classification of in-home care provider the family member provider to allow eligible long-term care and developmental disability clients to receive help with personal care and household tasks when other resources are not available. The two current classifications are agency provider and individual provider. Consolidate developmental disability waivers (*) $12.0 million Merges the Basic and Basic Plus waivers into a single waiver based on a flexible model instead of the current service allocation model. About 7,000 clients will be authorized to spend a pre-determined amount on services at an aggregate level rather than by the specific service. Clients can select their own mix of services within the determined amount. Eliminate rate add-ons for nursing homes $9.9 million and assisted living (*) Stops rate add-ons given to providers to take more Medicaid clients,reduce staffing ratios and increase wages. Monthly,nursing homes serve more than 10,000 elderly individuals and assisted living facilities serve more than 4,500 individuals. Eliminate state-only employment and day services (*) $9.1 million Terminates supported employment services for 488 clients with developmental disabilities who have not been placed in a Medicaid waiver program. Reduce administrative rates for home care agencies $8.8 million Cuts the administrative payment that agency providers receive for overhead expenses from$5.00 per hour to $4.00. Suspend Individual and Family Service program (*) $8.4 million Suspends services to nearly 1,000 families for respite care,therapies and other activities which help them keep loved ones with developmental disabilities in their homes. Reduce Senior Citizens Services Act funding $7.8 million Reduces funding to the minimum level necessary to satisfy the maintenance-of-efforts requirements (minimum match required by the state to accept federal funds) of the Older Americans Act. Alternative: Reduce funding by 20 percent (*) $1.6 million Cuts funding to the Area Agencies on Aging,which provide case management services and other services, such as Meals on Wheels,to elderly individuals to help them remain in their homes. Eliminate Adult Day Health program (*) $4.1 million Makes ineligible nearly 1,000 individuals with developmental disabilities or in long-term care who now receive assistance with medication management, cognitive and physical therapies,and group interactions. 6 Budget Reduction Alternatives October 2011 Eliminate Volunteer Chore Services program $2.8 million Terminates program that each year enables more than 295,000 individuals with functional or cognitive impairments to receive assistance with household tasks,yard work, transportation, minor home repairs and other activities. Alternative: Reduce funding by 20 percent (*) $560,000 Close one residential habilitation center (*) $2.0 million Shutters the Rainier School residential habilitation center through the use of federal grants and one-time funding to transition approximately 350 clients to community-based settings or other residential habilitation centers. Because the average monthly cost in an institution is more than $15,000 per client, significant future biennia savings are expected. ECONOMIC SERVICES Reduce state funding for subsidized child care by 18 percent $75.0 million Affects 6,000 children whose low-income families now receive subsidized child care while parents are working. Alternative: Reduce by 12 percent (*) $50.0 million Affects 4,000 children. Eliminate aged, blind or disabled grants $29.7 million Terminates monthly grants to more than 15,000 individuals who are aged, blind or disabled, or who are qualified to seek Social Security Income assistance. Current maximum monthly grant is $197. Reduce TANF time limit $26.5 million Shrinks maximum time a family can receive a TANF (Temporary Assistance to Needy Families) grant from 60 to 36 months,which eliminates eligibility for nearly 4,600 families. Alternative: Reduce time limit to 48 months (*) $18.3 million Affects 1,900 families. Reduce TANF grants by 5 percent $19.4 million Cuts TANF grants by 5 percent,which for a family of three will shrink the monthly amount by $23 to $454. Alternative: Reduce grant amounts by 2 percent (*) $7.7 million Shrinks monthly grant to $468. Earn federal TANF contingency funds (*) $17.6 million Awaiting receipt of new federal funds. Eliminate State Food Assistance program (*) $14.5 million Halts food assistance to an estimated 13,000 individuals each month who are not eligible for federal food assistance due to lack of documentation of citizenship. 7 Budget Reduction Alternatives October 2011 Eliminate Disability Lifeline medical program (*) $8.7 million Terminates medical services to 21,000 clients. Eliminate State Family Assistance program (*) $6.0 million Stops cash assistance to 1,200 families who do not meet TANF eligibility criteria due lack of documentation of citizenship. The average monthly payment is $240. Eliminate naturalization services (*) $2.6 million Ends naturalization services to legal immigrants attempting to become U.S. citizens. The program serves about 4,400 individuals annually. Reduce funding for refugee and limited $1.8 million English proficiency services (*) Cuts 15 percent of program that will now target clients with the lowest level of English-as-a-Second language proficiency. Serves 4,900 clients annually, of whom 735 will become ineligible. Restrict replacement of electronic benefits transfer cards (*) $752,000 Halts replacement of EBTs in DSHS Community Service Offices, except in case of emergency, effective July 1,2012. Cards are used for cash and food for low-income clients. JUVENILE REHABILITATION ADMINISTRATION Eliminate parole services for juveniles $19.1 million Terminates all parole treatment and services for youths. Parole services are now provided to approximately 400 juveniles each month. Alternative: Reduce parole services by 20 percent (*) $3.8 million Cuts will reduce the time in which parole is provided or reduce the number of juveniles served. Reduce juvenile court county funds by 20 percent (*) $5.5 million Cuts funding sent to counties for evidence-based programming that serves juveniles,affecting approximately 1,900 youths. Close a youth camp (*) $3.8 million Shutters one facility and transfers youths to other state facilities. Reduce caseload and increase efficiencies in facility transitions (*) $3.3 million Releases juveniles with non-violent offenses and a low-risk score on the minimum release date. Achieves additional savings by delaying new hires and services during facility transitions. Eliminate expansion of juvenile behavioral therapy programs (*) $750,000 Terminates therapy for approximately 200 aggressive youths and their families. 8 Budget Reduction Alternatives October 2011 MENTAL HEALTH Close hospital wards and change eligibility standards $57.8 million Closes four state hospital wards and places 120 patients in community settings. Eligibility and benefits changes will limit the use and cost of community-based Medicaid services. Alternative: Close two civil wards at Western State Hospital (*) $1.5 million Closes two wards and places 60 patients in community settings. Delay implementation of Involuntary Treatment Act changes (*) $22.6 million Changes implementation date of House Bill 3076 from Jan. 1, 2012,to July 1,2015. This postpones the expected increase in utilization of community-based and institutional mental health services. Reduce regional support network Medicaid rates $11.6 million Reduces Medicaid payments by 4 percent.About 43,000 Medicaid recipients per month receive services through these organizations that deliver mental health services for Medicaid and non- Medicaid clients in communities across the state. Alternative: Implement utilization management (*) $9.5 million Institutes process to reduce excessive use of mental health services. Close state hospital wards for dementia and $5.1 million traumatic brain injury clients (*) Shuts down two wards at Western State Hospital and places 52 patients in long-term care community settings. Reduce non-Medicaid funding for regional support networks (*) $4.9 million Cuts funding for mental health services provided by regional support networks to 8,000 non- Medicaid clients per month. Capture savings in ITA and offender reentry program (*) $3.2 million Lowers funding to match expected spending for pharmaceuticals, equipment and professional fees for individuals who are involuntarily committed to a community mental health hospital. Also trims funding for mental health services to dangerously mentally ill offenders released from correctional institutions. Use federal block grant for waivered mental health services (*) $2.1 million Replaces state funds with federal funds for such services as supported employment, Club House for adult services and respite care. Consolidate regional support networks (*) $1.8 million Reduces number of regional support networks from 13 to six by Jan. 1,2013. Eliminate Spokane acute care diversion proviso $1.7 million Removes funding for services that divert mental health patients from the state hospital system. This funding is now provided only to the Spokane regional support network. Alternative: Reduce by 50 percent (*) $844,000 9 Budget Reduction Alternatives October 2011 Eliminate hospital bed penalty charged to regional $1.5 million support networks (*) Terminates the penalties charged to regional support networks that excessively direct their clients to the state hospital system. ADMINISTRATION Reduce payments to other agencies by 10 percent (*) $5.4 million Eliminate non-core mental health programs (*) $1.4 million Terminates the TeamChild,Juvenile Detention Alternatives Initiative and Washington Mentoring programs. Reduce administration (*) $841,000 Eliminate community initiative funding (*) $700,000 Terminates funding for a public/private partnership that supports at-risk youth and families. 10 Budget Reduction Alternatives October 2011 HEALTH SERVICES HEALTH CARE AUTHORITY Change eligibility for Children's Health Insurance Program $145.0 million Terminates funding for 134,000 categorically needy children,as defined by the Medicaid program, above 150 percent of the federal poverty level,which is $33,525 for a family of four. Families will have the option to purchase full health care coverage at 100 percent of the premium. Alternative: Implement premiums for children over 150 percent $22.1 million of the federal poverty level (*) Holds premiums between$50 and$75 so that no family will pay more than 5 percent of income. Suspend adult Medicaid pharmacy benefits $127.3 million Halts state Medicaid plan from providing adult coverage for 277,000 clients now receiving outpatient drugs from a retail pharmacy, effective Jan. 1, 2012. Children will continue to receive benefits. Includes a 36 percent offset for increased medical costs.Medicaid-optional program. Eliminate Disability Lifeline medical program (*) $110.0 million Ends medical services to 21,000 clients enrolled in the Disability Lifeline and ADATSA (Alcoholism and Drug Abuse Treatment Support Act) programs. Eliminate Medically Needy Medicaid program $61.2 million Terminates program now serving 13,000 Medicaid clients, effective Jan. 1, 2012. Eliminate Basic Health Plan (*) $48.1 million Terminates program that delivers subsidized health care to 35,000 low-income individuals, effective Jan. 1, 2012. Establish drug formulary for Medicaid clients (*) $37.0 million Sets up formulary for preferred generic drugs. Reduce Apple Health for Kids $34.0 million Eliminates medical coverage for approximately 25,000 undocumented children. Alternative: Implement premiums for children over 150 percent $1.2 million of the federal poverty level (*) Holds premiums between$20 and$50 so that no family will pay more than 5 percent of income. Reduce certified public expenditure hospitals (*) $27.8 million Cuts state grants for hospitals that receive help with costs of providing charity care. Majority of the reduction will affect Harborview Medical Center and the University of Washington Medical Center. 11 Budget Reduction Alternatives October 2011 Modify critical access hospital payment methodology (*) $27.2 million Changes the payment methodology for critical access hospitals to the same methodology used for other hospitals, effective July 1, 2012.Affects 41 critical access hospitals,which are facilities in underserved rural communities. Eliminate maternity support services $20.9 million Ends program that provides services to 55,000 pregnant women who are at risk of unhealthy birth outcomes.Medicaid-optional program. Alternative: Reduce by 50 percent (*) $9.6 million Maintains the minimum level required by the federal government. Eliminate disproportionate share grants (*) $13.1 million Terminates grants to health care facilities in small and rural communities for indigent patients. Discontinue routine dental care for persons with developmental disabilities, $11.7 million long-term care clients and pregnant women (*) Affects 38,000 individuals who will receive only emergency dental services.Medicaid-optional program. Eliminate over-the-counter pharmaceutical coverage (*) $9.9 million Terminates coverage for all over-the-counter pharmaceuticals for Medicaid clients. Institute medical services cost sharing (*) $6.1 million Implements cost sharing for prescription services,non-emergent client transportation, non- emergent emergency room visits and physician services. Eliminate medical interpreter services (*) $4.8 million Discontinues the state subsidy that covers the cost of interpreter services offered by medical providers to communicate with Medicaid clients whose primary language is not English.Medicaid- optional program. Eliminate state funding for school-based Medicaid (*) $3.2 million Shifts remaining cost for school-based medical services from state funds to local district funds to earn federal Medicaid reimbursement. Eliminate health care for workers with disabilities $1.9 million Terminates this program for 2,100 clients who receive health benefits so they can get healthy and keep their jobs. Medicaid-optional program. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH Eliminate Blue Ribbon Commission Act public health funds (*) $9.8 million Terminates state support to local public health departments to increase vaccinations and reduce obesity and chronic and communicable diseases. Half of these funds were cut in the 2009-11 budget. 12 Budget Reduction Alternatives October 2011 Reduce public health prevention and protection (*) $7.2 million Cuts state funds for HIV prevention outreach and direct client services by 10 percent.Will pay only for health coverage for Medicare Part D prescription drug plans so clients keep access to antiretroviral medications. Eliminates dental care coverage for 1,200 clients with HIV. Terminates state funds for other health and prevention programs. Reduce family planning grants $6.8 million Cuts grants that help local jurisdictions provide family planning-related services. This reduction may limit access to clinics. !Alternative: Reduce by 10 percent from base funding (*) $1.8 million Reduce environmental health protection (*) $1.3 million Cuts technical assistance and monitoring of water systems, on-site septic system permitting and compliance activities,public health lab community outreach, and surveillance of plague mosquito- borne and tick-borne diseases. Reduce administration (*) $936,000 Reduce health care and emergency medical systems (*) $739,000 Cuts emergency medical systems and area health education centers. Eliminates malpractice insurance program for volunteer retired provider. 13 Budget Reduction Alternatives October 2011 PUBLIC SAFETY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS Eliminate offender supervision $97.0 million Terminates offender supervision except for interstate cases and special sentences. Includes an offset of$30 million for community public safety impacts. Alternative: Implement offender supervision reforms (*) $27.0 million Institutes efficiencies and evidence-based practices in supervision of violator population. Reduces the length of supervision to 12 months for all offenders except sex offenders,who will be supervised for 24 months. Allow early release of offenders (*) $18.0 million Releases 150 days early offenders assessed at low to moderate risk of reoffending,and sex offenders assessed at low to moderate risk of reoffending. Closes one minimum-security camp and changes security level of Washington State Reformatory at Monroe from medium to minimum security. Repurpose Old Main at Walla Walla $16.2 million Converts units at the Old Main in Walla Walla to minimum-security units. Medium-security level prisoners will be relocated to other medium-security facilities in the state. Alternative: Repurpose Old Main and invest savings in safety $13.8 million improvements as recommended by a safety committee (*) Eliminate chemical dependency programming for offenders $11.1 million Ends chemical dependency treatment to all offenders except where required by the courts through special sentencing alternatives. Alternative: Reduce chemical dependency programming (*) $5.0 million Retains chemical dependency treatment for offenders sentenced under the Drug Offender Sentencing Alternative. Reduces treatment for offenders in prison and on community supervision by 50 percent. Reduce administration and maintain vacancy savings (*) $9.6 million Cuts administration and support functions. Eliminates the Jail Industries Board,which promotes employment through partnerships with labor,business, communities and other organizations. Increase offender health care co-payments (*) $1.8 million Requires offenders with resources to pay more of their health care costs through higher co-pays. 14 Budget Reduction Alternatives October 2011 SPECIAL COMMITMENT CENTER Expedite court hearings for low-risk residents (*) $1.8 million Identifies residents deemed to be at low risk of reoffending and advances them to the courts for consideration of release. Limit funding for costs for sexually violent $1.3 million predator commitment trials (*) Specifies that the state will cover only defense costs for attorneys,paralegals and sheriff transportation,in addition to one expert witness per side and one continuance. Reduce general services (*) $1.2 million Cuts food and nursing services, recreation and contracts. STATE PATROL Charge fee to local governments for use of State Crime Lab $4.5 million (effective July 1, 2012) (*) Requires local governments to pay a fee for crime lab services related to non-violent crimes now offered at no cost. 15 Budget Reduction Alternatives October 2011 NATURAL RESOURCES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Eliminate funding to county fairs (*) $3.0 million Terminates funding to county fairs to pay for premiums (prize money).Achieves savings by reducing state funding transferred into the Fair Fund. Preserves funding for community and youth fairs. Eliminate international marketing program $1.6 million Cuts program that helps Washington farmers and ranchers to sell crops and agricultural products on international markets. Alternative: Reduce by 50 percent $773,000 Eliminate invasive knotweed control program $758,000 Terminates grants to local entities to combat invasive knotweed,which if left unchecked harms native plants and fish species. Alternative: Shift program to the Aquatic Lands Enhancement $758,000 Account and Freshwater Aquatic Weeds Account (*) CONSERVATION COMMISSION Reduce administrative/operations grants to conservation districts (*) $1.4 million Reduces administrative and operations grants to conservation districts by 57 percent to encourage districts to pursue local assessments. To date, only 15 of 47 conservation districts have implemented local assessments to fund district administration and projects. DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Reduce staff funded through General Fund-State (*) $2.6 million Holds vacant 14 state-funded positions in a number of programs,including air quality,water resources,water quality and administration.Will reduce capacity for motor vehicle emission testing, stream-flow monitoring,water quality permit administration and water resources management. Reduce state subsidy of agricultural burning program (*) $222,000 Shrinks state subsidy for permitting of agricultural burning. Reduction can be made up through fee increases recommended by the Agricultural Burning and Research Task Force. 16 Budget Reduction Alternatives October 2011 DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE Replace hydraulic project permit General Fund-State $1.9 million support with alternative funding (*) Cuts GF-S funding and explores other ways of supporting this program,which helps protect fish from impacts of projects in rivers and streams. Close hatcheries and fisheries $1.6 million Closes the Samish and Nemah hatcheries,which will halt production of all fall Chinook salmon in the Nooksack/Samish region and about 40 percent of Chinook and chum salmon production in Willapa Bay. Reduces the Puget Sound sea urchin and sea cucumber fishery and closes all state commercial salmon and sturgeon fisheries in Grays Harbor. Shift hatchery operations to the State Wildlife Account (*) $1.5 million Shifts 22 percent of hatchery operations to the State Wildlife Account on a one-time basis to continue fish production for commercial and recreational fisheries. Reduce salmon recovery and habitat protection $1.2 million Reduces summer chum recovery efforts in Hood Canal and Grays River, along with several salmon monitoring activities. Delays hydraulic project permit processing,which will reduce fish protection and delay the start of projects.Also cuts technical assistance to salmon recovery groups. Reduce senior management (*) $1.1 million Eliminates six division and regional managers at headquarters and regional offices. Reduce payment in lieu of taxes payments to local governments (*) $772,000 Rolls back payments to counties to 2009 levels. Counties receive payments from the department in lieu of property taxes that would be assessed if the land were privately owned. Eliminate Puget Sound toxic sampling in fish $714,000 Terminates sampling of Pacific herring and English sole for toxic contaminants,which will hamper the state's ability to track progress in reducing toxics in sediments. Alternative: Shift program to the Aquatic Lands $714,000 Enhancement Account (*) Reduce shellfish harvest and management $536,000 Reduces clam and oyster seed planting on public beaches by 30 percent,resulting in a 20 percent reduction in recreational harvest within two to three years. Eliminates two Puget Sound crab and shrimp managers,which will delay openings for winter crab fisheries and lowered catch limits. Implement cost recovery for energy project habitat $486,000 technical assistance (*) Allows entering into cost-reimbursement agreements for technical assistance to energy project developers to protect fish and wildlife habitat. 17 Budget Reduction Alternatives October 2011 Shift equipment purchases to the Fish and Wildlife Equipment $355,000 Revolving Fund (*) Shifts a portion of GF-S equipment purchases to this revolving fund. Eliminate ballast water inspections in Puget Sound $352,000 and the Columbia River Terminates ballast water inspections of commercial vessels entering the state,which will hamper the ability to prevent the introduction of aquatic invasive species such as zebra mussels. Alternative: Shift program to the Aquatic Lands $352,000 Enhancement Account (*) Suspend agricultural damage payments (*) $300,000 Suspends payments to compensate landowners for confirmed damage to agricultural crops caused by wildlife (primarily deer and elk). DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Capture fire suppression savings (*) $2.0 million Takes savings from lower-than-expected wildland firefighting costs for the 2011 season. Switch correctional camp work to state trust lands (*) $300,000 Focuses work by correctional camp crews on silviculture activities on state trust lands instead of recreation and local government sites. Use existing funds for Agriculture College Trust management (*) $270,000 Due to the current fund balance, the agency will not require state support for land and timber management activities on the Agriculture College Trust lands. STATE PARKS Reduce state support by 10 percent $1.7 million Holds vacancies, cuts park maintenance and cancels a contract with local sheriffs for ocean beach enforcement. 18 Budget Reduction Alternatives October 2011 GENERAL GOVERNMENT CENTRAL SERVICES CHARGES/STATEWIDE Reduce central services and related charges to state agencies (*) $16.0 million Requires state agencies to control costs and demands for service. Total central service billings to client agencies will be reduced by approximately$50 million,roughly half in General Fund-State savings. Reduce agency budgets by 10 percent (*) $1.9 million Affects agencies with 26 or more FTEs (full-time equivalent employees) and GF-S biennial budgets of less than$10 million. Reduce small agency budgets by 5 percent (*) $1.4 million Affects agencies with 25 or fewer FTEs. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Eliminate essential needs and housing support program $45.7 million Terminates grants to 16,170 low-income individuals. Alternative: Eliminate essential needs and housing funds. Provide $35.7 million community-based housing and case-management services to mental health and developmentally disabled clients discharged from institutions. (*) Provides $10 million flex funding for housing and treatment service providers for case- management services to recently de-institutionalized individuals. Eliminate sexual assault formula grants $9.5 million Terminates state funds for grants to the 39 community programs that deliver prevention and treatment services to victims of sexual assault. Annually,more than 85,000 individuals are served. Programs take in about 10,000 new clients, 57 percent of whom are children. Alternative: Reduce grants by 20 percent (*) $3.0 million Eliminate Innovation Research Team (STARS) and reduce the $2.5 million Economic Development Commission (*) Terminates STARS,which are teams of scientists who develop new technologies to keep Washington competitive in the green economy. Reduces the state Economic Development Commission,which will delay the update of the state's Strategic Economic Development Plan. Require competitive process for local economic development $2.5 million organizations and reduce state funding by 30 percent (*) Moves to a competitive process to access funding so that associations with projects of greatest promise are funded. Cuts funding to local economic development organizations. 19 Budget Reduction Alternatives October 2011 Eliminate victim witness support $1.8 million Ends grants to victim witness programs in each of the 39 county prosecutor offices. Annually,the programs assist 43,000 crime victims and witnesses in pursuing prosecution. Alternative: Reduce grants by 20 percent (*) $570,000 Eliminate Homeless Assistance program $1.7 million Terminates program that provides rental assistance to 1,590 people annually. Eliminate community services block grants (*) $1.4 million Terminates state funding for approximately 690,000 people in 276,000 households who now receive housing, nutrition, employment and emergency food and shelter services. Eliminate grants for domestic violence legal advocacy $1.4 million Terminates grants to 48 community-based, domestic violence prevention programs that assist with protection orders and divorce and separation papers. In fiscal year 2011,nearly 5,680 individuals were served. Alternative: Reduce grants by 20 percent (*) $564,000 Eliminate community mobilization grants (*) $1.2 million Terminates grants that counties use to help prevent and reduce substance abuse and violence. More than 175,000 youths and adults were served in the 2009-11 biennium. Eliminate victims services $1.2 million Terminates funding for 13 regional centers that deliver 24-hour crisis intervention. Alternative: Reduce by 20 percent (*) $526,000 Eliminate State Drug Task Force (*) $808,000 Ends state funding for the Multi Jurisdictional Narcotics Drug Task Force,which will cause closure of seven of 19 local task forces. In fiscal year 2009,this program helped dismantle 170 criminal organizations. Other funding is available. Eliminate state energy policy unit $720,000 Shutters this unit which boosts the state's ability to improve energy efficiency and develop renewable energy businesses that can compete in the global marketplace. Alternative: Reduce program by 10 percent (*) $112,000 Eliminate Retired Senior Volunteer Program $380,000 Terminates funds to recruit and support volunteers in 18 programs in 32 counties. In fiscal year 2010,nearly 13,000 senior volunteers provided more than 2 million hours of service to communities. Reduce dispute resolution center funding (*) $375,000 Reduces state grants by 60 percent for 21 local dispute resolution centers,which offer mediation services and training. More than 80,000 individuals were served in 2009. Shifts focus to housing foreclosure mediation services. 20 Budget Reduction Alternatives October 2011 Reduce Long-Term Care Ombudsman grants (*) $327,000 Cuts grants by 20 percent for 12 regional ombudsman offices that train volunteers who investigate and mitigate complaints from residents (and their families) of long-term care facilities and adult family homes. Eliminate Asset Building program (*) $324,000 Ends funding for services such as free tax preparation, foreclosure assistance, credit counseling and small-business training to thousands of low-income working families. Reduce support for administration of community services $270,000 and housing programs (*) Reduces the management and administrative support of programs recommended for elimination or reduction,including asset building, community services block grant,New Americans, Retired Senior Volunteer and crime victims services.Applies to second year of the biennium. Eliminate New Americans Program (*) $250,000 Terminates program that helped 1,780 legal immigrants become naturalized citizens in fiscal year 2011. Reduce international trade and business development activities (*) $100,000 Cuts market development assistance,business matchmaking services at trade shows and trade missions that support international trade. Will hamper state's ability to promote Washington products internationally. DEPARTMENT OF ENTERPRISE SERVICES Shift state support for contracts unit and reduce support (*) $965,000 Moves the contracts unit's state funding to dedicated sources. Reduces state funding for utilities, operations and maintenance services to legislative agencies, and shifts funding for the Capital Projects Advisory Review Board to the capital budget. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIES Reduce funding for Crime Victims Compensation program (*) $2.2 million Cuts state funding with no change in client benefits. Higher level of federal benefits will offset the loss of state funds. Use fees for factory assembled structures and reduce administration (*) $1.2 million Shifts program that inspects mobile and modular homes and other built structures to fee basis.Will not reduce the number of inspections.Also cuts funding for department administration. MILITARY DEPARTMENT Close selected armories and reduce administration (*) $1.6 million Reduces number of local armories from 32 to 28 (Everett, Prosser, Pullman and Tacoma) and cuts the department's administration and facilities management. 21 Budget Reduction Alternatives October 2011 DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE Reduce expenditures in non-revenue generating activities (*) $7.3 million Cuts spending by 3.5 percent without affecting revenue collections by holding vacancies in non- revenue-generating positions,reducing telephone assistance and customer service,and cutting support for tax policy, fiscal analysis and rule making. ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE Eliminate the Homicide Incident Tracking System and reduce the $1.2 million Criminal Investigation Program (*) Terminates HITS,which is used to track and solve violent crimes. HITS information is available through other federal and regional databases. HITS and CIP provide services that local law enforcement agencies could receive elsewhere, or pay the state or other entity to provide. Retains 20 percent of CIP funding to continue provision of some services to very small counties. COURTS/JUDICIAL AGENCIES Reduce by 10 percent (*) $22.2 million Eliminate Parents Representation program (effective July 1, 2012) $11.5 million Terminates program that provides low-income parents in dependency proceedings with the assistance of state-funded attorneys. (included in the 10% reduction) OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR Reduce by 10 percent (*) $1.1 million LEGISLATURE Reduce by 10 percent (*) $14.2 million SECRETARY OF STATE Reduce administrative and other costs (*) $3.1 million Cuts administration, closes library branch in Washington State Penitentiary eastern complex, scales back State Library services and supplies,reduces TVW funding by 7 percent and other actions. 22 Budget Reduction Alternatives October 2011 EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION Impose 10 furlough days $38.0 million Assumes same exemptions as specified in Senate Bill 6503. Under previous furlough program, as many as 14,000-24,000 employees were affected by each statewide furlough day. Impose additional 1 percent salary reduction for K-12 employees (one year) $37.0 million Reduces all K-12 salary allocations by 1 percent, effective for the 2012-13 school year. Impose additional 1 percent salary reduction for state employees (one year) $32.7 million Boosts current salary reductions for most state employees from 3 to 4 percent. For represented employees,will require reopening the collective bargaining agreements and reaching agreement with each union. Increase health contributions for general government employees (one year) $28.0 million Boosts percentage paid by employees from 15 to 25 percent. For represented employees,will require reopening the collective bargaining agreements and reaching agreement with each union.Will reduce employer (state) monthly per-employee contribution from$850 to $807. Alternative: Reduce PEBB monthly per-employee $16.0 million funding rate from $850 to $825 (*) Reduce monthly state allocation for K-12 employee health benefits (*) $20.0 million Reduces state allocations to school districts for employee health benefits from$768 to $745 per month. Reduce LEOFF Plan 2 employer contribution $15.0 million to actuarially necessary rates (*) Reduces the state contribution to the LEOFF Plan 2 pension,which covers local law enforcement officers and firefighters. The pension is funded by a combination of contributions in which the members pay 50 percent of the total contributions, the employers pay 30 percent and the state pays 20 percent. Suspend step increases (one year) $11.4 million Delays step increases for about one-third of the workforce,including approximately 20,000 general government classified employees who have been subject to a 3 pay reduction, effective July 1,2012. Requires reopening the collective bargaining agreements and reaching agreement with each union. Alternative: Exclude employees who earn less $9.7 million than $2,500 per month Adjust contributions to Judicial Retirement System to payout rate (*) $4.0 million Slows the projected increase in fund balance. End sick leave cash-outs for employees who are not retiring $476,000 Terminates the practice of paying state employees annually for one-quarter of their unused sick leave for balances in excess of 480 hours. For represented employees,will require reopening the collective bargaining agreements and reaching agreement with each union. 23 Budget Reduction Alternatives October 2011 LOCAL GOVERNMENT REVENUE SHARING Eliminate liquor profits sharing (effective Feb. 1, 2012) $53.9 million Eliminates sharing of state liquor profits,under which 50 percent of license and permit fees and liquor markup revenues received by the Liquor Control Board are distributed to counties, cities and towns. Distributed by population, 10 percent is shared with all 39 counties and 40 percent is shared with all 281 cities and towns. Funds can be used for any local government purpose, but each jurisdiction must spend at least 2 percent of its distribution to support alcohol or drug addiction programs. Alternative: Eliminate (July 1, 2012) (*) $35.4 million Alternative: Reduce by 10 percent (July 1, 2012) $3.5 million Eliminate county criminal justice assistance $42.1 million (effective Feb. 1, 2012) Ends General Fund-State support for county criminal justice purposes, such as police, courts,jails, prosecutors,defense and victim advocates.All 39 counties receive funding according to a formula based on population and criminal cases filed in superior court. Alternative: Reduce by 5 percent (July 1, 2012) $1.68 million Eliminate streamlined sales tax mitigation (effective Feb. 1, 2012) $36.4 million Ends revenue distribution to two counties, 51 cities and seven transit districts that impose a sales tax to mitigate revenue losses resulting from the Streamlined Sales and Use Tax Agreement,which changed sales and use from an origin-based, sales-tax sourcing scheme to a destination-based, sales- tax sourcing scheme. Alternative: Reduce by 25 percent (July 1, 2012) $6.2 million Eliminate liquor excise tax sharing (effective Feb. 1, 2012) $33.2 million Eliminates the state's liquor excise tax revenue sharing (35 percent of all collections) that counties, cities and towns receive. Distributed by population,20 percent goes to 39 counties and 80 percent goes to 281 cities and towns. Funds can be used for any local government purpose,but each jurisdiction must spend at least 2 percent of its distribution to support alcohol or drug addiction programs. Alternative: Eliminate (July 1, 2012) (*) $26.4 million Alternative: Reduce by 10 percent (July 1, 2012) $2.6 million Eliminate the rural county economic development sales tax credit $24.0 million (Effective March 1, 2012) Terminates a tax credit that allows 32 rural counties to retain up to 0.09 percent of the state's sales tax to fund public facilities such as street improvements,bridges and water/sewer systems that serve economic development purposes. Alternative: Reduce credit to 0.04 percent (May 1, 2012) (*) $10.7 million 24 Budget Reduction Alternatives October 2011 Eliminate the local public health MVET backfill (effective July 1, 2012) $24.0 million Eliminates GF-S support that 35 local public health departments receive to compensate for revenue losses from the repeal of the motor vehicle excise tax due to the passage of Initiative 695. Alternative: Reduce by 20 percent (July 1, 2012) $4.8 million Eliminate the annexation sales tax credit (effective Feb. 1, 2012) $17.8 million Terminates a tax credit that benefits seven cities in King, Pierce or Snohomish counties. Under the credit, cities that annexed an area with a population of at least 10,000 are allowed to retain 0.2 percent of the state's sales tax generated in the city to fund the cost of extending city services to the annexed area. Alternative: Eliminate (May 1, 2012) (*) $13.5 million Alternative: Reduce by 50 percent (July 1, 2012) $7.9 million Eliminate city criminal justice assistance (effective Feb. 1, 2012) $16.7 million Ends GF-S support for county criminal justice purposes, such as police, courts,jails,prosecutors, defense and victim advocates. Funds are distributed in five categories: 1) population;2) high crime; 3) violent crime;4) innovative law enforcement strategies; and 5) contracted law enforcement services. All 281 cities and towns receive one or more distribution. Alternative: Reduce by 5 percent (July 1, 2012) $688,000 Eliminate distressed city and county assistance (effective Feb. 1, 2012) $8.9 million Ends this program under which 1.6 percent of the state's real estate excise tax is deposited into an account to help counties with low sales tax bases,and cities with low sales and property tax bases, fund local government services. Fourteen counties and 170 cities received assistance in fiscal year 2011. Alternative: Eliminate (July 1, 2012) $6.4 million Alternative: Reduce by 20 percent (July 1, 2012) $1.3 million Eliminate state portion of county prosecuting attorneys salaries $2.9 million (effective July 1, 2012) Ends state contribution to county prosecuting attorney salaries. In 2008, the Legislature tied the salary of prosecuting attorneys to those of superior court judges, and agreed to cover half the cost of prosecuting attorney salaries. Reduce funding for the Criminal Justice Training Commission $1.5 million by 10 percent (effective July 1, 2012) Cuts state funding for the commission,which provides training and certification for all law enforcement officers in Washington state, except the State Patrol. Ninety-five percent of the individuals trained are city, county and tribal peace and corrections officers,while a small number are state enforcement, corrections and peace officers. Alternative: Require 50 percent contribution $3.3 million 25 Budget Reduction Alternatives October 2011 (July 1, 2012) (*) Eliminate Rural County Drug Task Force funding $1.5 million (effective July 1, 2012) (*) Terminates one-time temporary state funding for additional rural drug task forces. Alternative: Reduce by 50 percent (July 1, 2012) $ 725,000 26 General Fund Reduction Alternatives (Dollars in Thousands) Governor Alternatives Preliminary Choices EARLY LEARNING Reduce Preschool enrollment by 25% 14,000 Reduce Preschool enrollment by 11% 6,000 Reduce Seasonal Child Care administration 2,070 2,070 Eliminate state funding for Child Care Resource and Referral 1,276 1,276 Reduce Department of Early Learning administration 950 950 Eliminate Family,Friends and Neighbors professional development 400 400 Eliminate Reach Out and Read program 300 300 Total Early Learning(w/highest dollar amount option) 18,996 4,996 K-12 EDUCATION Eliminate state levy equalization payments to school districts 300,000 Reduce state levy equalization payments to school districts by 50% 150,000 150,000 Reduce state levy equalization payments to school districts by 25% 75,000 Reduce state levy equalization payments to school districts by 10% 30,000 Eliminate school transportation services to protect classroom 220,000 Increase class size by two students in Grades 4 through 12 137,000 137,000 Reduce school year by one week(from 180 to 175 days) 125,000 Bus Depreciation change 49,000 49,000 Eliminate National Board certification bonus 40,000 Reduce National Board certification bonus 8,373 8,373 Eliminate full-day kindergarten 38,000 Base school funding on average daily attendance calculation 33,000 Revise state attendance policy 6,400 6,400 Eliminate or reduce SPI funding for small grants and projects 9,000 9,000 Reduce SPI funding for small grants and projects by 10% 2,400 Reduce staffing formula for small high schools 5,000 5,000 Reduce OSPI state office administration by 10% 600 600 Total K-12(w/highest dollar amount option) 955,889 365,373 School for the Blind and Center for Childhood Deafness and Hearing Loss Reduce state support for School for the Blind and Center for Childhood Deafness 1,422 Reduce School for the Blind and Center for Childhood Deafness budgets by 5% 711 711 HIGHER EDUCATION Eliminate State Need Grant student financial aid 303,000 Reduce maximum State Need Grant award amount by 25% 68,400 Limit State Need Grant to Public Institutions Only 30,600 Reduce State Need Grant eligibility to 55%of median family income 25,500 Reduce state support to colleges and universities by 20% 222,000 Reduce state support to colleges and universities by 15% 166,000 166,000 Reduce state support to colleges and universities by 10% 111,000 Suspend state Work Study Program 8,000 8,000 Total Higher Education(w/highest dollar amount option) 533,000 174,000 Total Education $1,510,018 $545,080 27 Governor Alternatives Preliminary Choices HUMAN SERVICES Department of Corrections(DOC) Eliminate/reduce offender supervision 96,970 27,000 Implement early release of offenders 18,000 18,000 Re-purpose Old Main at Walla Walla 16,209 13,809 Reduce chemical dependency programming for offenders 11,123 5,000 Reduce administration and maintain vacancy savings 9,556 9,556 Increase offender healthcare co-payments 1,784 1,784 Total DOC 153,642 75,149 Department of Social and Health Services(DSHS) Children's Administration Maximize federal funding 14,452 14,452 Reduce utilization of contracted services 12,985 12,985 Eliminate/reduce state funding for domestic violence programs 9,436 946 Increase caseload ratios 8,166 8,166 Eliminate child welfare programs 7,300 7,300 Reduce Children's Administration services 4,734 4,734 Eliminate family reconciliation services 4,721 4,721 Reduce length of stay in foster care 876 876 Juvenile Rehabilitation Reduce Juvenile Court county funds 5,536 5,536 Eliminate/Reduce juvenile parole services 19,100 3,822 Close juvenile institution 3,817 3,817 Reduce caseload and increase efficiencies in facility transition 3,309 3,309 Eliminate expansion ofjuvenile behavioral therapy programs 750 750 Mental Health Reduce eligibility for mental health services and close wards 57,822 1,505 Delay implementation of Involuntary Treatment Act changes 22,558 22,558 Reduce RSN Medicaid payments 11,566 9,500 Close State hospital wards for dementia and traumatic brain injury 5,119 5,119 Reduce RSN non-Medicaid funding 4,875 4,875 Capture savings in ITA and offender re-entry program 3,226 3,226 Use Federal Block Grant for waivered mental health services 2,072 2,072 Consolidate Regional Support Networks(RSN) 1,797 1,797 Eliminate Spokane Acute Care Diversion funding 1,687 844 Eliminate state hospital bed penalties 1,500 1,500 Developmental Disabilities Reduce eligibility for developmental disability services 79,525 5,000 Eliminate homecare provider health insurance 20,831 Create a new provider classification 16,857 Consolidate the basic and basic plus waivers 12,000 12,000 Eliminate State-Only employment and day 9,100 9,100 Suspend Individual and Family Services Program 8,425 8,425 Close residential habilitation centers 2,000 2,000 Reduce homecare agency administrative rates 1,496 28 Governor Alternatives Preliminary Choices Long-Term Care Reduce eligibility for long-term care services 124,857 30,000 Eliminate homecare provider health insurance 53,565 Implement family provider changes 43,047 Eliminate rate add-ons for nursing homes and assisted living 9,945 9,945 Reduce Senior Citizens Services Act Funding 7,828 1,566 Eliminate Adult Day Health program 4,120 4,120 Eliminate/Reduce Volunteer Chore Services program 2,800 560 Reduce homecare agency administrative rates 7,306 Economic Services Reduce state funding for subsidized child care 75,000 50,000 Eliminate aged,blind,disabled and pregnant women cash grants 29,697 Reduce TANF/WorkFirst time limits 26,481 18,329 Reduce TANF/WorkFirst grants 19,417 7,677 Earn federal TANF contingency funds 17,600 17,600 Eliminate State Food Assistance Program 14,500 14,500 Eliminate Disability Lifeline medical program 8,660 8,660 Eliminate State Family Assistance Program 5,972 5,972 Eliminate Naturalization Program 2,624 2,624 Reduce funding for refugee and limited English proficiency assistance 1,775 1,775 Restrict replacement of electronic benefit transfer cards 752 752 Chemical Dependency Reduce chemical dependency services 14,516 14,516 Eliminate ADATSA chemical dependency treatment 5,170 5,170 Eliminate long-term residential treatment 2,719 2,719 Utilize Criminal Justice Treatment Account under-expenditures 2,087 2,087 Block grant chemical dependency services to counties 2,081 2,081 Close Pioneer Center East 2,050 2,050 Limit detoxification services 1,875 1,875 Limit chemical dependency assessments 188 188 Vocational Rehabilitation Reduce Vocational Rehabilitation services paid with state funds 2,171 2,171 Special Commitment Center(SC() Expedite court hearing for low-risk residents 1,825 1,825 Limit funding for costs for sexually violent predator commitment trials 1,316 1,316 Reduce SCC general service costs 1,235 1,235 Administration and Payments to Other Agencies Reduce payments made to other agencies 5,397 5,397 Eliminate non-core programs 1,384 1,384 Reduce administrative costs 841 841 Eliminate Community Initiative funding 700 700 Total DSHS 859,139 380,569 Health Care Authority(HCA) Basic Health Plan Eliminate the Basic Health Plan 48,130 48,130 29 Governor Alternatives Preliminary Choices Medicaid Purchasing Eliminate optional coverage for children above 150%of federal poverty level 145,000 Implement premiums for children's health above 150%of federal poverty level 22,100 22,100 Suspend adult Medicaid pharmacy benefits 127,314 Eliminate Disability Lifeline/ADATSA Medical Services 109,972 109,972 Eliminate Medically-needy Optional Medicaid Program 61,200 Establish formulary for generic drugs 37,000 37,000 Eliminate Undocumented,Non-Citizen Apple Health children's coverage 34,010 Eliminate certified public expenditure grants 27,800 27,800 Modify critical access hospital payment methodology 27,203 27,203 Reduce Maternity Support Services 20,923 9,594 Eliminate disproportionate share grants 13,140 13,140 Eliminate non-emergent adult dental 11,695 11,695 Eliminate over-the-counter drug coverage 9,900 9,900 Cost sharing for medical services 6,100 6,100 Eliminate medical interpreter services 4,846 4,846 Eliminate state funding for school-based Medicaid 3,200 3,200 Eliminate Health Care for Workers with Disabilities Program 1,900 Implement premiums for undocumented children's health coverage 1,200 1,200 Fund Moore,et al v.HCA with PEBB Funds 886 886 Total HCA 691,419 332,766 Human Rights Commission Reduce administrative costs 448 448 Services for the Blind Use federal funds for Business Enterprise Program costs 227 227 Reduce Independent Living Program 227 227 Veterans Affairs Reduce General Fund expenditures by earning more federal funds 1,626 1,626 Department of Health Eliminate Blue Ribbon Public Health Funds 9,750 9,750 Reduce public health protection and prevention 7,191 7,191 Eliminate/Reduce Family Planning Capacity Grants 6,750 1,800 Reduce funding for environmental health risk prevention 1,329 1,329 Reduce administrative costs 936 936 Reduce health care and emergency medical systems 739 739 Total DOH 26,695 21,745 Total Human Services $1,733,423 $812,757 NATURAL RESOURCES Reduce General Fund transfer to Fair Fund 3,000 3,000 Reduce Ecology GF-S funded staff 2,616 2,616 Capture Fire Suppression savings 2,007 2,007 Replace hydraulic project permit general fund support with other funding 1,937 1,937 30 Governor Alternatives Preliminary Choices Reduce State Park GF-S support by 10% 1,733 Close hatcheries and fisheries 1,563 Shift hatchery operations to the Wildlife Account 1,500 1,500 Reduce international agricultural marketing program by 100% 1,546 Reduce international agricultural marketing program by 50% 773 Reduce administrative grants to conservation districts 1,360 1,360 Reduce Salmon Recovery and Habitat Protection 1,158 Reduce Department of Fish and Wildlife senior management 1,131 1,131 Reduce Payment-in-Lieu-of-Taxes payments to local governments 772 772 Eliminate Invasive Knotweed Control Program 758 Shift Invasive Knotweed Control Program to Aquatic Lands Enhancement Account 758 758 Eliminate Puget Sound toxic sampling 714 Shift Puget Sound toxic sampling to Aquatic Lands Enhancement Account(ALEA) 714 714 Reduce Shellfish Harvest and Management 536 Implement cost recovery for Energy Project Habitat technical assistance 486 486 Shift portion of Fish and Wildlife equipment purchases to equipment revolving account 355 355 Eliminate Ballast Water Management in Puget Sound and Columbia River 352 Shift Ballast Water Management in Puget Sound/Columbia River to ALEA 352 352 Switch Correctional Camp Funding to dedicated accounts 300 300 Suspend GF-S Agricultural Damage claim payments 300 300 Use existing funds for Agriculture College Trust Management 267 267 Reduce GFS subsidy of agricultural burning program 222 222 Total Natural Resources(w/highest dollar amount options) $23,113 $18,077 GENERAL GOVERNMENT Reduce central services and related charges to agencies 16,000 16,000 Reduce Department of Revenue non-revenue activities 7,301 7,301 Reduce Secretary of State GF-S by 10% 3,100 3,100 Reduce state funding for the Crime Victims Compensation program 2,200 2,200 Reduce Military Department,including armories and emergency services 1,601 1,601 Eliminate AG Homicide Incident Tracking System,reduce criminal investigation program 1,230 1,230 Use alternative funding for Factory Assembled Structures and cut L&I's indirect costs 1,170 1,170 Reduce Governor's Office by 10 percent 1,061 1,061 Reduce GF-S support for contracts unit,legislative agencies,and Capital Projects Board 965 965 Department of Commerce-Community Services Eliminate Community Services Block Grant 1,400 1,400 Reduce support for Community Services and Housing operations 870 Reduce support for Community Services and Housing operations by 20% 270 270 Eliminate Retired Senior Volunteer Program(RSVP) 380 Reduce Long Term Care Ombudsman Grants to Regional Offices 327 327 Eliminate Asset Building Program 324 324 Eliminate New Americans Program 250 250 Eliminate funding for Federal Way Multi-Service Center 55 55 Department of Commerce-Crime Victims Eliminate Sexual Assault Formula Grants 9,518 Reduce Sexual Assault Formula Grants by 20% 3,035 3,035 Eliminate Victim Witness funding 1,780 Reduce Victim Witness funding by 20% 570 570 31 Governor Alternatives Preliminary Choices Eliminate Domestic Violence Legal Advocacy 1,380 Reduce Domestic Violence Legal Advocacy by 20% 564 564 Eliminate state funding for Victims of Crime Act 1,250 Reduce state funding for Victims of Crime Act by 20% 526 526 Department of Commerce-Criminal Justice Eliminate Community Mobilization grants 1,229 1,229 Eliminate State Drug Task Force funding 808 808 Eliminate Dispute Resolution Center funding 625 Reduce Dispute Resolution Center funding and focus on housing foreclosure 375 375 Department of Commerce-Housing Eliminate Housing and Essential Needs program 45,678 Housing/Essential Needs Program:provide$10 million for DD and MH case management 35,678 35,678 Eliminate Homeless Assistance program 1,688 Reduce Homeless Assistance program by 20% 540 Department of Commerce-Energy Eliminate State Energy Policy 720 Reduce State Energy Policy by10% 112 112 Department of Commerce-Economic Development Assume competitive grants for Associate Development Organizations 2,500 2,500 Eliminate funding Entrepreneurial STARS program and move to UW and WSU 2,320 2,320 Reduce Economic Development Commission by 20% 170 170 Reduce Business Development activities 100 100 Washington State Patrol-Crime Lab Implement fees for non-violent crime evidence analysis 4,540 4,540 Total General Government(w/highest dollar amount options) $112,540 $89,781 STATEWIDE AND COMPENSATION Reduce small agencies(more than 25 FTEs/less than$10 million)by 10% 1,884 1,884 Reduce small agencies(less than 25 FTEs)by 5 percent 1,377 1,377 Reduce legislative and judicial agencies by 10 percent 36,415 36,415 Impose 10 furlough days(same exemptions as ESSB 6503) 38,000 Impose additional 1 percent salary reduction for state employees(1 year) 32,765 Impose 1 percent salary reduction applied to School Year 2012-13 37,000 Increase state employee health benefit contribution to 25 percent 28,000 Reduce employer(state)monthly per-employee PEBB funding rate from$850 to$825 16,000 16,000 Reduce K-12 Employer monthly per employee contribution from$768 to$745 20,000 20,000 Suspend Step Increases for State Employees(1 year) 11,447 Suspend Step Increases,exclude those paid less than$2,500 a month(1 year) 9,713 End annual sick leave cash-out for employees who are not retiring 476 Reduce LEOFF2 to actuarially necessary rate 15,000 15,000 Reduce contributions to Judicial Retirement System to match payout 4,000 4,000 Total Statewide and Compensation (w/highest dollar amount options) $193,599 $94,676 LOCAL GOVERNMENT ASSISTANCE Eliminate Liquor Profits Sharing(effective 2/1/12) 53,900 Eliminate Liquor Profits Sharing(effective 7/1/12) 35,400 35,400 Reduce Liquor Profits Sharing 10%(effective 7/1/12) 3,500 Eliminate Liquor Excise Tax Sharing(effective 2/1/12) 33,300 32 Governor Alternatives Preliminary Choices Eliminate Liquor Excise Tax Sharing(effective 7/1/12) 26,400 26,400 Reduce Liquor Excise Tax Sharing 10% 2,600 Eliminate County Criminal Justice(effective 2/1/12) 42,100 Reduce County Criminal Justice 5%(effective 7/1/12) 1,680 Eliminate Streamlined Sales Tax Mitigation(effective 2/1/12) 36,400 Reduce Streamlined Sales Tax Mitigation 25%(effective 7/1/12) 6,200 Eliminate Rural County Economic Development Sales Tax Credit(effective 3/1/12) 24,000 Reduce Rural County Economic Development Sales Tax Credit to 0.04%(effective 5/1/12) 10,700 10,700 Eliminate Local Public Health MVET Backfill(effective 7/1/12) 24,000 Reduce Local Public Health MVET Backfill 20%(effective 7/1/12) 4,800 Eliminate City Criminal Justice(effective 2/1/12) 16,700 Reduce City Criminal Justice 5%(effective 7/1/12) 688 Eliminate Annexation Sales Tax Credit(effective 2/1/12) 17,800 Eliminate Annexation Sales Tax Credit(effective 5/1/12) 13,500 13,500 Reduce Annexation Sales Tax Credit 50%(effective 7/1/12) 7,900 Eliminate Distressed City County Assistance(effective 2/1/12) 8,986 Eliminate Distressed City County Assistance(effective 7/1/12) 6,400 Reduce Distressed City County Assistance 20%(effective 7/1/12) 1,300 Eliminate State Funding of County Prosecuting Attorneys Salaries(effective 7/1/12) 2,900 Require local government to pay 50%of Criminal Justice Training Costs(effective 7/1/12) 3,300 3,300 Reduce Criminal Justice Training Commission 10%(effective 7/1/12) 1,500 Eliminate Rural Drug Task Force Funding(WASPC budget)(effective 1/1/12) 1,500 1,500 Reduce Rural Drug Task Force Funding 50%(WASPC budget)(effective 1/1/12) 725 Total Local Assistance(w/highest dollar amount options) $264,886 $90,800 Total Reductions(using highest dollar options for the"Alternatives"total) $3,837,579 $1,651,171 RESERVE Delay June 30,2013 Apportionment payment to July 1,2013 330,000 330,000 Estimated underexpenditures from Fiscal Year 2011 60,000 60,000 4,227,579 2,041,171 33 DRAFT ADVANCE AGENDA For Planning Discussion Purposes Only as of November 10,2011; 8:30 a.m. Please note this is a work in progress; items are tentative To: Council& Staff From: City Clerk,by direction of City Manager Re: Draft Schedule for Upcoming Council Meetings November 22,2011; NO MEETING(Thanksgiving week) November 29,2011, Study Session Format 6:00 p.m. [due date Mon, Nov 21] ACTION ITEMS: 1.First Reading Proposed Ordinance 11-020 Max. Criminal Penalty,Gross Misdemeanor—C.Driskell(10 minutes) 2.First Reading,Proposed Ordinance, 11-021 Electric Lightwave Franchise—Cary Driskell (15 minutes) 3.First Reading,Proposed Ordinance 11-022 Code Text Amendment CTA 04-11 —Mike Basinger(20 minutes) 4. Proposed Resolution 11-010 Adopting Planning Commission Revised Rules of Procedure—Scott Kuhta(10 min) 5.Motion Consideration: Quit Claim Deed,Brown's Park—Kelly Konkright (10 minutes) 6.Motion Consideration: Funding Allocation,Lodging Tax—Mark Calhoun (10 minutes) NON-ACTION ITEMS 7. Shoreline Discussion—John Hohman (30 minutes) 8. Governance Manual,Chapter 1 Review—Chris Bainbridge (20 minutes) 9. Info Only: Dept Reports 10. EXECUTIVE SESSION: Pending/Potential Litigation [*estimated meeting: 125 minutes] December 6,2011, Study Session Format,6:00 p.m. [due date Mon,Nov 28] 1. Oath of Office for Council positions#3 and 5—Chris Bainbridge (10 minutes) 2. Gateway Signs—Mike Stone (20 minutes) 3. Street Preservation—Neil Kersten (20 minutes) 4. Street Maintenance Contract Renewal—Neil Kersten (15 minutes) 5. Sweeping Contract Renewals—Neil Kersten (15 minutes) 6. Police Department Accreditation—Rick VanLeuven (15 minutes) 7.Advance Agenda—Mayor Towey (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting: 100 minutes] Tuesday,Dec 13; 9 a.m. —1 p.m. —Tentative Council Tour December 13,2011,Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due date Mon,Dec 5] 1. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 2. Second Reading Proposed Ordinance 11-019 Amending 2011 Budget—Mark Calhoun (10 minutes) 3. Second Reading Proposed Ordinance 11-020 Max.Criminal Penalty,Gross Misdemeanor—C.Driskell(10 min) 4. Second Reading Proposed Ordinance 11-021 Electric Lightwave Franchise—Cary Driskell (10 minutes) 5. Second Reading Proposed Ordinance 11-022 CTA 04-11 —Mike Basinger (10 minutes) 6.Mayoral Appointments of Councilmembers to various Committee and Boards—Mayor Towey (15 minutes) 7.Mayoral Appointments of Planning Commissioners —Mayor Towey (10 minutes) 8.Motion Consideration: Street Maintenance Contract Renewal—Neil Kersten (15 minutes) 9.Motion Consideration: Sweeping Contract Renewals—Neil Kersten (15 minutes) [*estimated meeting: 100 minutes] December 20, 2011,No meeting (Christmas Week) Draft Advance Agenda 11/10/2011 1:50:56 PM Page 1 of 2 December 27, 2011,Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. [due date Mon,Dec 19]] 1. Info Only: Dept Reports [*estimated meeting: minutes] January 3,2012, Study Session Format,6:00 p.m. [due date Tue,Dec 27] 1. Oath of Office for Council positions #2, 3 and 6—Chris Bainbridge (10 minutes) 2.Mayor and Deputy Mayor Elections—Chris Bainbridge (15 minutes) [*estimated meeting: minutes] January 6-7:Elected Officials Essentials: (A WC training)Spokane January 10,2012,Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due date Tue,Jan 3]] 1. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 2. Proposed Code Text Amendment,Boundary Line Adjustments—Marty Palaniuk (15 minutes) 3. Landscaping Code Amendments—John Hohman (30 minutes) [*estimated meeting: minutes] January 17,2012, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m. [due date Mon,Jan 9] 1.Advance Agenda January 24, 2012,Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. [due date Mon,Jan 16] 1. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll minutes) (5 minutes) 2.First Reading Proposed Ordinance,Code Text Amendment,Boundary Line Adjustments—M.Palaniuk(10 min) 3. Info Only: Dept Reports [*estimated meeting: minutes] January 25-26: CLAC(City Legislative Action Conference)- Olympia January 31,2012, Study Session Format,6:00 p.m. [due date Mon,Jan 23] 1.Advance Agenda February 7,2012, Tentative Retreat,8:30 a.m.—4:00 p.m. [due date Mon,Jan 30] Possible topics:Economic Development; February 7,2012, Study Session Format,6:00 p.m. [due date Mon,Jan 30] 1.Advance Agenda February 14, 2012,Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. [due date Mon,Feb 6] 1. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll minutes) (5 minutes) 2. Second Reading Proposed Ordinance,Code Text Amdmnt,Boundary Line Adjustments—M.Palaniuk(10 min) [*estimated meeting: minutes] OTHER PENDING AND/OR UPCOMING ISSUES/MEETINGS: Bidding Contracts(SVMC 3.—bidding exceptions) Revenue Policy,Cost Recovery Centennial Trail Agreement Senior Housing Contracts,Annual Renewals,histories,etc. Shoreline Draft Goals and Policies Fire Department Interlocal Agreement Sidewalks Greenacres Trail/Northern Railroad Sprague Appleway Corridor Environ.Assessment Investment Accounts Manufactured Homes Mission Ave Design(Mission&Long ped. crossing) *time for public or council comments not included Pavement Management Program Update Prosecution Services Public Input Process for Capital Projects Draft Advance Agenda 11/10/2011 1:50:56 PM Page 2 of 2 Spokane County Library District Spokane Valley Library Services and District Support Report to the City of Spokane Valley 3rd Quarter 2011 GREATER SPOKANE VALLEY LIBRARY SERVICES Customer use measures Year-to-date,Spokane Valley Library customer use continues to be mixed. The library materials circulation increase of 1.8% is substantial since it's the fourth year of growth. It's lower than the District as a whole because the total number also includes online activity,including e-book and audiobook downloads,which are on a steep upward trajectory. Notable at Spokane Valley and elsewhere is the decrease in computer bookings,perhaps a reflection of the wider availability of mobile devices that can also access the web. Selected 3rd Quarter 2011 Year-to-Date Statistics Circulation Door count Reference Program Computer Inquiries Attendance Bookings YTD YTD to YTD YTD to YTD YTD to YTD YTD to YTD YTD to 2011 2010 2011 2010 2011 2010 2011 2010 2011 2010 SCLD 2,017,716 4.5% 1,057,361 -0.6% 187,824 0.1% 44,136 10.7% 179,747 -8.6% Spo Valley 482,333 1.8% 248,826 -1.6% 60,220 -5.3% 13,113 1.7% 56,427 -6.3% Argonne 138,141 3.7% 80,056 -1.0% 12,880 -0.6% 1,648 -1.4% 16,527 -11.6% Otis Orch. 65,573 -6.2% 40,155 -3.6% 7,426 7.5% 2,147 6.4% 4,762 -13.7% Subtotal 686,047 1.3% 369,037 -1.7% 80,526 -3.5% 16,908 1.9% 77,716 -8.0% SCLD 34.0% - 34.9% - 42.9% - 38.3% - 43.2% - Registered Customers by Branch of Registration 2011 %of YTD Change YTD SCLD from 2010 SCLD 117,467 - 0.6% Spo Valley 36,628 31.2% -0.2% Argonne 10,959 9.3% 2.2% Otis 4,546 3.9% -2.2% Subtotal 52,133 44.4% 0.1% 3rd quarter activity highlights at Greater Spokane Valley branches Spokane Valley Library In July,the teen Anime Club once again broke a record with 35 turning out for"Drawing Manga 101." In August,the highest adult program attendance was the Spanish Guitar program at 17. September programs included Teen Writers of the Inland Empire (T.W.I.N.E.),the Anime Club, Email Basics,as well as every type of Storytime. Several staff members,including the book cart drill Page 1 of 6 team,participated in the annual Hearts of Gold parade to kick off ValleyFest. A customer damaged the iron railing on the retaining wall on the south side of the parking lot when he ran into it with his car. Fortunately,it did its job and prevented the car from falling six feet into the alleyway. Argonne Library To update the June story about the Edsel owner who was grateful for wiring diagrams,he brought the car to the library to show the staff. They thought it looked pretty good.While we accept our role as the Centennial Trail alternative parking lot,the presence of two bike clubs launching a morning ride on July 5 tested our tolerance by taking up nearly half the parking places. One group was from out of town and in the future the other will use a new lot farther east on Upriver Drive. August programming was quite successful with the Spanish Guitar concert the best ever attended adult program,13 people attended the Backyard Bounty pickle program and 8 teens were at the Wii afternoon. Otis Orchards Library Summer program numbers were up from last July. Staff helped a customer apply online for a free phone available to low-income seniors. The customer needed quite a bit of computer help and was extremely grateful for our help. The weather was perfect the outdoor Bluegrass band concert. At 45, it was the highest attended all-ages program here since 2005.While a customer was in the library with her mother,someone smashed a window in their van and stole a purse from the backseat. DISTRICT-WIDE LIBRARY SERVICES Customer use Circulation of library materials continues to be up 4% over the end of the third quarter 2010. Reference inquiries January to September remain at 0% growth District-wide for the year. For the eighth consecutive month,the total number of software station bookings remains down by 9% for the year with the decline across all branches. Door count is down slightly (-1%) compared to Jan- Sep 2010,although in September we surpassed the 1,000,000th for the year.So far this year we've seen an increase in total program attendance (+10%) that has outpaced the additional number of programs presented (+6%). Adult services Programming: District-wide,computer class attendance was generally down from 2010,as were book discussion groups. However,adult summer program attendance was up. The most popular programs were the four Bluegrass concerts and six Spanish guitar programs. In September,we debuted a Facebook Fundamentals class and had 18 attend,most bringing their own laptop computers rather than using our portable lab. Community:We visited 45 adult facilities each month during the quarter. Youth services Programming:July was the busiest month of summer for programming,with a children's program every week as well as Storytimes,and this year we added a few programs for older elementary students into the mix,along with the teen programs. Our meeting rooms were at capacity for most. Summer Reading ended with 104 youth programs having an average attendance of 38 and a grand total attendance of 3,998. (2010: 95 programs with an average attendance of 42 and a grand total attendance of 4,019).Storytime continued into the fall with no break in programming. With the addition of Argonne and North Spokane libraries,all ten branches now have a Play and Learn Storytime. Community: During the quarter we provided 76 Storytimes to 854 children at 35 different childcares; summer is a slower time for childcares as families go on vacation,and many of the preschools and ECEAPs are closed in July and August.We received a$2,000 Target Early Literacy Page 2 of 6 Grant to help expand our Play and Learn Storytimes to all 10 branches.We completed the activities for the Thrive by Five Culture of Literacy (in cooperation with NEWESD 101) grant;they included two additional STARS trainings,one at Spokane Valley Library and the other at the Colville Library, and a series of short videos that are currently in production. BOARD OF TRUSTEES Board of Trustees action,July-September • Approved revisions to the Disposal of Surplus Property and Emergency Closure of Facilities policies;reaffirmed the Gifts Policy. • Approved an interlocal agreement with the City of Spokane regarding mitigation of the West Plains Annexation. • Established special meeting dates and times for executive director candidate screening and preliminary interviews. • Reviewed the 2012 budget preparation schedule and heard an overview of major revenue and expense changes from 2011. • The August meeting was cancelled. Upcoming Trustee position vacancy The Board of County Commissioners Office published an announcement for applications to fill the Board of Trustees position being created by Jake Laete's upcoming retirement.With the December 2 closing date,applicant interviews won't be completed until the December 20 Board of Trustees meeting. Executive Director recruitment The executive director position announcement was posted August 22,with an application closing date of October 7. Search consultant June Garcia distributed the brochure via email to over 450 contacts and it was posted to several public library job websites as well as SCLD's. There was no print advertising. DISTRICT ADMINISTRATION West Plains Annexation On July 13,the City of Airway Heights and City of Spokane filed the required Notice of Intention with the Washington State Boundary Review Board for Spokane County (BRB) for their parts of the annexation proposal. Airway Heights' area is 380 acres immediately east of the city limits/Hayford Road,including most of the population and retail development in the entire annexation area. The City of Spokane's is 9.6 square miles and includes Spokane International Airport and commercial/industrial land along Highway 2. Only 126 people reside in the area. Since the annexation is to be effective January 1,2012,after this year SCLD will no longer receive property tax revenue from that area. However,under the City of Airway Heights library service contract with SCLD,the city's payment is based on the combined assessed valuation so there will be no revenue impact on the District. The anticipated annexation mitigation agreement with the City of Spokane would provide full reimbursement for lost taxes in Year 1,then a decreasing amount over the next four years. The District's annexation mitigation agreement with the City of Spokane,approved at the September 20 Board of Trustees meeting,is scheduled for Spokane City Council action in October. After it is approved we'll need to wait until final certification of assessed valuations in January before we can calculate the exact base-year mitigation fee. Page 3 of 6 Library site research Groundwork was laid to identify and evaluate potential sites for three of the new facilities proposed in the Library Facilities Master Plan: Spokane Valley and Cheney libraries replacements and a new South Spokane Valley branch. 2011 budget review The second mid-year budget review was completed with only a few minor changes in line items and no increase in total expenditures. Overall,revenue increased by$8,798 (primarily Upriver Drive property rental income and two small grants) and expenses increased by$8,299 (over half of which was grant-related and replacement of an alarm panel at Deer Park) that was taken from the contingency line item. This wraps up it up for the 2011 budget year. 2012 budget planning Property taxes The Spokane County Assessor's Office provided the first of its series of assessed valuation estimates indicating SCLD's 2011 valuation for 2012 property taxes for county-assessed real property. It dropped by about 2% (similar to last year),translating to about$225,000 in revenue. Fortunately,last year's levy lid lift provided an adequate cushion. Apart from any increase in 2012 revenue from sources other than property tax,there's about$800,000 more in recurring revenue than recurring expenses going in to 2012. The Assessor's Office mid-September assessed valuation update showed that new construction was higher than anticipated but that revaluations dropped a bit more. Salaries and benefits Not surprisingly,medical insurance costs will increase again. Washington Counties Insurance Fund's Premera PPO plan premiums will go up 9.75% and Group Health 7.10%. Vision Service Plan and Willamette Dental rates will increase by 5% but Washington Dental Services will drop by 9.75% by reducing the large balance in the rate stabilization fund. The Board of Trustees slated the discussion on 2012 staff salaries for its October meeting. Airway Heights'library annexation The City of Airway Heights Library District Annexation Advisory Committee will recommend to City Council that it place a proposal on a 2012 election ballot to annex to Spokane County Library District. Online database use report The quarterly database usage report shows little change in overall rankings for the 19 we provide. The top three continued to be Auto Repair Reference Center,ReferenceUSA,and the ProQuest group (ProQuest, Culture Grams,and World Conflicts). Ancestry Plus moved up from number five to number four and Consumer Reports went from six to five. Not surprisingly,the top five have the lowest cost per click-through (exiting our website to the vendors'). They range from$0.86 to$1.99. In contrast,Encyclopedia Americana was$5.68, and New Book of Popular Science was$11.43 per click-through. The average for all was$2.49. Updated population estimates According to the State Office of Financial Management's 2011 population estimates published late summer,our service area population increased 0.4% to 255,845 over the past year,which is about 54% of Spokane County's total. Of SCLD's total,53% is in the unincorporated county and 47% is in cities and towns. Our ten-year overall population increase is 13%. 2012 non-resident library card fee A 1999 Board of Trustees resolution establishes the formula for our non-resident fee calculation to ensure non-resident use isn't subsidized by District residents: current year budgeted tax revenue Page 4 of 6 and contract fees are divided by the number of households to get the following year's per- household fee. The fee has been$100 for a couple of years,but the 2012 calculation comes out to $104.96 so it will be$105 per year for all cards purchased after January 1. DISTRICT SUPPORT SERVICES Collection Services • Ordered 5,847 titles and 20,226 copies,a little below the average for the year;processed, added to the system,and sent out 24,167 items to branches. • Net year-to-date increase in the print/nonprint collection of 9,291 items after a monthly net increase of 2,061 nonprint and 89 print items during the quarter. • Checkout of downloadable audiobooks and ebooks continued to break records each month. • The Kindle app was released on September 21 making e-book content available to Kindle users for the first time. Circulation increased an average of 19 per day and the number of unique and new users also sharply increased. • Spokane Is Reading is the featured business of the month at Sterling Savings Bank Argonne branch in October. Communications • In media relations,articles on Summer Reading,the trustee vacancy,and Kindle ebook availability were published in the Spokesman-Review and Examiner.com,and covered on KHQ. • In e-marketing,added the new Welcome tab on Facebook;launched the e-newsletter;launched the mobile version of our website;launched the redesign of the Kids'website section;added three new homepage features. • In community activities,edited and submitted article for Success by Six website;registered SCLD for Valleyfest and the parade;and created a full-page informational piece for the Cheney Parks&Recreation brochure. Human Resources • Recruited for seven positions with selections made by supervisors for four;there were four resignations,and no promotions,reclassifications or transfers. • The executive director recruitment brochure was completed and approved by the Board of Trustees and recruitment is underway. • The Essential Skills for Supervisors class series was completed;Safe Environment Training was completed with 101 employees participating. • Safety Committee met in August;there were no issues of note. Information Technology • After extensive testing,we began using an iPad with cellular broadband to check out materials during outreach facility visits. • Wireless catalog computers and Pay Station locations and furniture have been finalized with one Pay Station set up at Spokane Valley. • About two-thirds of the 153 new staff computers were replaced by the end of September. • Our new mobile site went live early in the month,and is automatically served to mobile devices (smart phones and tablets). Finance, Facilities, &Purchasing Page 5 of 6 • In finance,at the end of the third quarter property taxes collected year-to date totaled$6,145,647 with$1,914,950 cash on hand in the General Operating Fund and$1,166,577 in the Capital Projects Fund. • In facilities,the parking lot resealing and striping project was completed,the railing on the south side of the Spokane Valley Parking lot was repaired after being hit by a customer,non-gang- related graffiti was removed from North Spokane Library,and the Deer Park carpet replacement project was scheduled to begin November 15. • In purchasing and inventory control,the 2011 inventory of controlled and fixed assets was completed. • The State Auditor's Office will begin the District's 2009-2010 audit in mid-October. Page 6 of 6 lSpokane Community Development Valley Monthly Report y September 2011 PERMIT CENTER Revenue Permits Permit revenue for September 2011 was $158,690. This figure is ahead September of last year. Permit Revenue $300,000 $250,000 Li $200,000 $150,000 $100,000 - 16$50,000 • [111� L $0 .. Ar- L Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec IIII _2011 Revenue 2010 Revenue Land Use Land Use revenue for September 2011 was $11,844. At this time, Land Use revenue to-date has moved ahead of last year's revenue at this time. Land Use Revenue $16,000 O $14,000 dw $12,000 4 _ �° $10,000 �' ci $8,000 $6,000 j $4,000 1 $2,000 $0 Jan Feb Mar April May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec 02011 Revenue 02010 Revenue Page 1 of 8 Irpkane Community Development Valley Monthly Report y September 2011 Valuation The valuation' for September 2011 was $21,541,017. $35,000,000 Permit Valuation • $30,000,000 $25,000,000 $20,000,000 $15,000,000 $10,000,000 $5,000,000 ��/♦ tileorsomm• $0 —M—w Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec mi"...2011 Valuation x• 2010 Valuation Lf fiee ffinancial-Management Permit_Information (Permitslsscued) September 2011 Dwelling Residential New Separate Demolition Units Structures Dwelling Units Permits Demolished Single Family Residence 9 Duplex 2 Triplex 4-PI ex Apartments September 2011 New Tenant Commercial Buildings Improvements Additions 29 14 1 Per the currently adopted Master Fee Schedule,valuations reported above for commercial and residential construction permits are "assigned based on the value of the construction work as stated by the applicant or the value calculated by the Building Official using the latest valuation data published in the Building Safety Journal by the International Code Council,whichever is greatest." Page 2 of 8 PO ane Community Development ley Monthly Report September 2011 Permit.4ctivity Certificate of Occupancy 9 Certificates of Occupancy were issued in September, including Aqua Elite Pool &Spa, three buildings at the Shelley Lake Apt complex, Vision Center, Northwest Copiers, Evergreen M.S. Modular. Permits Issued Community Development issued a total of 402 permits in September 2011. Construction Permits Issued 600 / 500 400 300 ' 200 / II II 1 ■ I 100 FIll 1 II 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec ■2011 Permits 159 121 246 338 349 395 278 334 402 2010 Permits 158 200 259 256 241 284 263 328 508 366 246 231 Land Use Applications The Planning Division processed the following applications in September: - Three Boundary Line Adjustments - One Final Binding Site Plan - One Preliminary Short Plat - One Final Short Plat - One SEPA Checklist (not associated with building permit or land use action) - One Plat Alteration Pre-application Meetings There were two land use pre-application meetings in September. 1) PRE-15-11 Comprehensive Plan Amendment @ 16913 E. Mission Avenue. (LDR to MUC) 2) PRE-16-11 Comprehensive Plan Amendment @ 819 N. Greenacres Rd. Page 3 of 8 Silokane Community Development Valle Monthly Report Valley September 2011 Business Licenses Staff approved 163 business licenses in September. Home Occupation Permits Staff approved 34 home occupation permits in September. Entertainers Licenses 2 entertainment licenses were processed for September. Express Permits There were 3 Express permits processed in September. CustomerSewice The Permit Center staff assisted 447 customers at the counter and handled 397 customers' inquires by phone in the Permit Center during September. The Permit Center staff provided an average target date of 10 working days for Commercial projects, 3 working days for Residential platted and 10 working days for Residential un-platted. This target date represents the time to first comments issued to the applicant. Inspections Right of Way Inspector: The Right-of-Way inspector performed 669 inspections in September. ■ Right-of-Way Inspections 1400 1200 ' ' 1000 • 800 • '< -----. 4\liiik 600 400 0 200 O 1 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept O'�t v Dc 0 2011 388 846 1121_==918 881 635 669M iii1i3iii - AI W 9559 1111.•U_ Page 4 of 8 Community Development POkane Valle Monthly Report September 2011 Building Inspectors: The City's Building Inspectors performed 502 residential inspections and 226 commercial inspections in the month of September. ■2011 Residential 2010 Residential A 2011 Commercial X2010 Commercial 1000 1 Building ,tr,.sp_r ' A ` o Inspection400 l Performed 10 1 II Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2011 Residential 296 275 395 490 459 456 405 489 502 0 0 0 2010 Residential 393 387 397 557 498 522 531 403 581 525 437 379 2011 Commercial 115 109 150 153 160 176 220 222 226 0 0 0 2010 Commercial 229 187 274 180 163 185 201 312 196 170 137 120 Development Engineering Inspector During the month of September the Development Engineering Inspector performed 23 site inspections. Development Engineering Inspections 45 40 35 30 25 20 iIii'Jli 15 10 5 � 1 - - 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Page 5 of 8 >17Community Development alle Monthly Report y September 2011 UPDATES Planning Planning Commission On September 22, 2011, staff conducted a Planning Commission study session on proposed changes to the City's fencing and landscaping. 2012 Comprehensive Plan Amendments/Updates Staff is developing a docket for the 2012 amendment cycle and met with a number of citizens interested in proposing amendments for pre-application meetings. Growth Management Steering Committee of Elected Officials (SCEO)— The Steering Committee conducted a meeting in September. The agenda included proposed changes to the Countywide Planning Policies and an update on the Urban Growth Area update process. Open Houses have been planned for October. October 24th one will be held in our council chambers. Shoreline Master Program Staff toured the Flora Road Gravel Pit with Central Pre-Mix staff to gain a better understanding of shoreline conditions and operational needs associated with gravel mining operations. URS Corporation has nearly completed the development of the Environment Designations. D partment-Vie Energy Grant Public Works continues to implement transportation projects that will result in energy conservation and carbon footprint reduction. Mary May presented changes to the City Council to grant as proposed by Avista. See the paragraph below for updates on the Bike and Pedestrian Master Plan. Washington State Energy Strategy Update Process The Washington State Energy Strategy update process provided an update to the legislature and the Governor December 1, 2010. The update was not intended to be a comprehensive revision. The full revision is expected to be delivered to the legislature and the Governor in December 2011. After requesting access to the public meeting scheduled in Ellensburg, Department of Commerce staff arranged a public meeting in Spokane. Approximately 25 people in various construction and business related industries have been contacted with the meeting information and a request that they attend the October 20 2011 meeting. Bike/Pedestrian Plan (BPMP) On September 20, 2011, Council worked through the requested strike through document identifying further changes to bring back for first ordinance reading. ADA Self-Survey A draft of the survey results report and transition plan are progressing. A first draft will be ready for core work group review in October. The final schedule will be developed in October for anticipated completion of the project by the end of the year. SEPA SEPA determinations were issued for a warehouse for American Recycling. Page 6 of 8 >%7Community Development alle Monthly Report y September 2011 Wellhead Protection Staff attended a Wellhead Protection committee meeting in September. Regional Partnering The Regional Partnering Group is still focused on the development and implementation of the SmartGov permit tracking and workflow system. While Spokane County and the City will have separate systems, staff is evaluating forms and processes to determine if forms can have a uniform appearance and if some processes, at least at the customer interface, can be more similar. In particular application forms for proposed use in Spokane, Spokane County and Spokane Valley are being discussed. The draft forms are simpler and less intimidating and intended for use with a new process for taking in applications. The three jurisdictions are also discussing details for language related to application expiration. Permit expiration is also being discussed but with recent code amendments already made in Spokane and Spokane County it is unlikely the permit expiration language will be re-addressed in the short term in those jurisdictions. Sign and Landscaping Regulations Staff continued to work on signage and landscaping regulations to present to the Planning Commission and City Council. Cote Compliance Citizen Action Requests Code Compliance Officers responded to 31 Citizen Action Requests. They are by type, listed below. Please remember that all complaints, even those that have no violation, must be investigated. 80% jI!IIIIINIIII 1 0 i': :suuiu 60% 40% lr uIuiirui 20% ° r- 0% Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec o Clear View Triangle 0 2 1 0 0 0 14 8 3 0 Complaint- No Violation 1 1 1 6 2 5 3 4 1 ■Environmental 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 oJunkAuto 6 3 6 8 7 11 8 14 5 v Property 4 4 8 11 10 22 20 37 14 ❑Signs 0 1 0 5 47 2 0 1 0 3Solid Waste 9 9 14 15 14 23 9 21 10 2011 Code Total Violations Reported - by Category Page 7 of 8 ""F Community Development pokane Valle Monthly Report September 2011 UPCOMING DATES OF INTEREST 10-6-11 !Fearing Examiner, Change of Conditions 10-11-11 City Council, Regular Meeting, BPMP 1st Reading 10-13-11 Planning Commission Regular Meeting —Study Session for CTA-04-11 10-18-11 City Council Study Session—continued discussion regarding signage 10-24-11 UGA Update Open House —County Sponsored Event 10-25-11 City Council Regular Meeting —BPMP 2°d Reading 10-27-11 Planning Commission Regular Meeting — Public Hearing CTA-04-11 11-10-11 Planning Commission Regular Meeting — Public Hearing landscaping regulations, study session CTA-05-11 survey requirements 11-11-11 Veteran's Day—City Hall Closed 11-24-11 Thanksgiving —City Hall Closed 11-25-11 Day after Thanksgiving —City Hall Closed Page 8 of 8