2006, 03-28 Regular Meeting
~
~
A,GCNUA
S['OKANF vt1LI.CY C1TY CoUNCiI.
SPEC[AL ML;ETlNG
Council Mceting #88
'I'ncsduy. M1tarcb 28. 2006 6,•00 p.m.
CI'I'Y E~A Ll, 4T REDW UOD PL:1ZA
11707 East Spragoe Avenne, F-irst Floor
Council Requests All Eiectronic I?evices be TurneJ O[tDuring Council Meettng
CALL'i'O ORDFR
IYVQCA7IUN: Pastor Manucl Dcnning of Fuuntain hiinistrics
FLEDGE nF ALLEGIANCE
KULL GALL
APrROVAL bF AGFNDA
INTRODUC770N OF SPECIAL GUESTS AND PRESENTATIOYS
CU~1IMITTEE. B0.4RD. i.LALSON SLTMi~iARY REPUR75
MAYOR'S RJKPORT:
P[JBL(C CnAi%1EHT'S I:xcept whcre indicsttcd helow for "public comment" this is an oppartunity fur
thc Public to spe;tk on anti• topic. VVhen you cume to the podiunt, pleuse statr your n;unr and addn:ss for
ihe rrcore1 ancl liiriil reinirks lo threti minuteti.
NI?W I3LISItiFtiS
1. Apprctiva! of A4inutcs ~,f farch ?U, 2QUb Speeia) Council Meeting, Cxecutive Session - Chris
Bainbridgc
2. Sc:cvod Reading Pmpusec! Ordinance 06-006 Rcpealing Qrdinance 05-015 in its Entirety - Mike
CunnrlIy [public cowmcatJ
Sccand Rending f'ruposr.c! Qrdinance 06-007 Rrpeating Partions af Spokane Vullcy Municipal Code
10.30.060 - hiikz Connelly (pnblic cammeat]
4. Pmposctl Resolution 06-002, Audiorizing Cii}' Mnnugcr to Sign Community Economic Rcvitalizntion
Baard (CFR(3) Applicaiion - Ncil Kcryten/Sfeve WorlcY (Pnblk cammentl
5. Motion Considerntiun: Spokanr Counly Memeranclum c+f Unciorstnnding, Sanitary Sewcr Project i'ha:.c
2 - Nuil Krrsttn ipublir comaieatJ
ti. Motion Considcrution: Supplcmcntal Agreement with C'H2M Hil1 for the Burker Road f'rojort Ncil
Krrsirn [public cammentj
7. Motion ConsidCrntion: Bartccr Roud Bid Ativard - Neil Krrsten jpublic CommrntJ
8. Motion Consi+icraiion: Authori•rntion fnr Appruval nf and Authoricntion for City ManaDrr's Execution
ofCertification Accepwnce QuaIiGcAtion Agn.~cmcnt-Neil Kerstcn [public romment)
9. Moticm Considcration: I..andscape and Wcrd Gcmvol Contract Bid Award - Ncil Kcrsten
[public comment]
10. %tation Considcration. CostoCLivingAdjustment forNon-repmscntcci Emplmee5 - Lra% e lvfen:icr
[public CU[D[IICJIIl
Pl!BLI(", ('OMhiE;\?ti Fyc.crt «•hcrc indicatcd ab,,vc t,}r .,public rummenC' Ui►s is :,ti uPpurlunicy lor
the public to spzak on any topic. Whan you connc to the podium, plaasc statc your namc and address for
the recuzd und limit remurks to thrcc miuutes.
ADA'[ItiISTR.ATINT RFPnRTS:
11. Fnir & Expa Ccnter's &onomic Impact Srudy - Chris I'ryc
12. Communic:ntion Grartl 13pdatt; - Ca[ W:ilker
13. Ludging Tax Rcvanucs, Attnrncy (_icama! (~~,i~~;n t '.~t; [>ri,k:ilr~,l~1;~• i „nr.~~lly
I-1 sulitl 1t',3:,tz tIlulate - %1ikc C'onnell~
INFUItMAT1OTi (_)NI.1': (1hc se itt, mA c J42 1 fi'.L u•,,Ci 1 0 )r r,!,'url,'.luj!ur:-J
1 i_ Dtpartmental Monthly Rc;pons
16. 2006 Scwcr Pavebi►ck Updacz 11rmor,►n:lurn
17 ftcsalution Apprcfving Non-Recourse Itevenue [3onds (Msclcay N4AnutaChtrin!~ t11in11,tn%)
18. Spokane Valley Lihrnry Services and District Support, FehrUat-y 1-006 Rcport
A DJOLTi2NhiEh"I'
FU7URE SCHEDULE
Rr.guliir CouncilAlzetings are gr.iierally heId 2nJ and 4`" TucsJut-s, begin»in„ irr h: rJ0 p.r,r.
CowrcUStudy Sewtars uregeneraQJ- held I", 3nd nrrcl Sfh Turcelut'.ti, begiiinitrg «t ri: Ull p.»r.
Other Trnlatii-r tfprominQ 11lee7inps/Evenfs:
!tiU 1 J(.'!:• !r►diviJuals pLvnning to anend the mecsing who require nxtial assisitance to accorrunadutn pk~3iud, hssring, or atha ~
Lm}~airmrnts. plcasc contnct the City Clcrk st 15fJ9)?21-1(1(1{l as mam as pnssible sn thu arrr.ngunr.ntti rnsy he m.ade
Counui AgendaU3-.'.ti-U6 Regui:u irtcesing pQe' „t' 2
. NiMUTES
. : City of Spokane Valley
. City Council ExecuEive Session
Monday, March 20, 2006
Atteridnrrce.'
Councilinernbers: Staff:
Diana Wilhite, Nfayor 17ave 1Ulercier, City Manager
Steve'1'aylor, Deputy Mayor Nina Regor, 17eputy City Manager
Dick Denenny, Councilmember
M'tke DeVleming, Couneilmember
Bill Gochmann, Councilmember
Rich Munson, Cnttncilme►nbcr
Gary Schimmels, Councilmember
F\11CUTIVT SFSS.CON: vlayor WilhiCe called the meeting t:o order at 5:30 p.rri. It was then rranverl hy
, Councilmember Denenny, secortdecl, and unur7imausly acr•eed tlui! Cozir2ci1 rrdjourt2 iiTto Exectrtive
Session ztntil trpprv,rinrately 7.•30 p.m. to drscirss labor negotiations crrrd potEntial prolmrty aeytrrsitioir,
arul lfiat rao frnal decisions were rnrticipulecl. Council adjourned into executive session.
At 6:57 p.m. iN1ayor Wilhite dcalared Council out of Fxeeutive Session. It tivas rnovetl by Councibrrember
DeY7eirting artd seconded, to reschethtle the 7'Ir:rrsday, Jl4crrch 23, 2006 Council meetrng to begin at S: 00
p.nt. rnt{ter thun 6: 00 p.nt. Vote by Acclnnration: br Fcrvor: Deputy Mayvr Taylor, curd Courtcilmen7bers
, Schimmels, GothiuUrrn, Denerrnv DeVleming, rnrd Muitson. Opposecl.• MUyor iVill:iFe. AGsteprtioizs•:
1 Aroire. A7ntion carried.
Il was then moved by Councilmember Gothiiiann, seconded, and unari.i.mously agreed to adjnurn. The
meeting adjaurncd at 7:03 p.m.
Dian1 Wilhite, vlayor
ATTF.S1`. ChrisCine Bainbridge, City Clerk
Couneil ilyfinutcs: 03-20-06 Pagc 1 of 1
Approued by Council:
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action Meeting Date: March 28, 2006 City Manager Sign-off:
Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislatiion
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Second Reading Proposed Ordinance 06-006, Repealing Ordinance 05-
015.
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: SVMC 10.30.060
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: The City Council, as codified in SVMC 10.30.060
adopted the Spokane County Zoning Code in its entirety. The Council also passed Ordinance
05.015 which renumbered various sections of the existing SVMC. On January 24th, 2006 the
Council referred this matter to the Planning Commission for review. The Planning Commission
has finished its review, including conducting a public hearing and has forwarded the matter to
the City Council without any recommended changes. At the March 21, 2006 council meeting,
Council approved advancing this ordinance to a second reading.
BACKGROUND: In adopting the entire Spokane County Zoning Code, a number of zone
r~ designations were adopted that were not applicable to the City of Spokane County. Other
sections were sections adopted by the county but never used or applied by the City of Spokane
Valley. The first ordinance will simply repeal those chapters that are not applicable. The
second ordinance repeals, for now, the ordinance renumbering specific sections of the SVMC.
The City staff is in the process of developing an entirely new development code to be
considered by the City Council. This numbering system will be used, at least in part, in the
development of this code. However, it currently creates conflict between existing sections of the
code and could confuse code users. The ordinance is being repealed to assist in an orderly
transition to the new UDC.
OPTIONS:
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Motion to approve ordinance 06-006.
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: NA
- STAFF CONTACT: Mike Connelly
; ATTACHMENTS: Ordinance 06-006
nRAFT
CTI'Y OF SPOKANE VALLL+'Y
SPOKANF COIJIV'1Y, WASHINGTON
Q12ll]NANCE n`O. 06-006 •
AN ORDINANCE ON' TAF CITY OF SFOKr1~~lE VALLFY, `VASFIINGTON, REl'EALINC.
SPOKAr°E VALLk;Y ORDINAiNCE 05-015 IN 1TS Er`T1:ltFTY, NVI3ICH RENUMBERZEll
VARI()US YFiQVISIONS OF THE SPOKANF, VALLEY MiJT`ICII'AL CODE, PROVII7TNG
FUR Sk:VERABILITY, AiND ESTAi3LISNING EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, The City Council adopted Ordinwice OS-Ol 5 on Marc;h 22, 2005, which renumbered
numerous sections of the Spokane Valley vfunicipal Code.
WFIEREAS, Due tn the eomplexity of the currently adopted zoning code provisions and the
anticipated development e}' a new Unifonn Development code (hereinafter UDC); and WHEKEAS, to ensure that no confliel ariscs during the pendency of the development of the new
UDC with thc exisiing and currently ef-feceive zoning c.ode provisions; and
VVFIEREAS, the City will consider adopting a numbering system subscantially similar to that now
being repealed at such time that the City`s Comprehe.nsive f'lan has been adopted and the UDC is drafred; and
WHEREAS, the folloNving changes are necessary to prntec[ the health; safety, and w•elfare of the general public and dhe environment;
NOW, THERFFO12E, che City Council of the City of Spokane Vallcy, Washing#on, ordains as
follows:
Section 1. Repeal of Saokdne Vallev Ordinance 05-015. Spokane Valley Ordinance 05-415 is hereby
repealed in its entirety. The Spokane Valley Code numbers for specific provisions revised by Ordinance OS-
O15 shall reveR to these numbers in effect prior to the adoption of ordinance 05-015.
Section 2. No effect on ordinances uassed subseauent to ordinance 05-015. Nothing in this
ordinance shall in aliy inanner change or alter the numbcring set forth in any ordinance passcd by the Spokane
Valley City Council after the date of passage of ordinance 05-015.
Section 3. Severabilitv. If any section, sentence, clause or pluase of this ordinancc shall be held to be
invalid or unconstitutinnal b}' a court of cqmpetent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not
affect the validity or eonstitutionality of airy other sectinn, sentence, clause or phr&se of this ordinance.
Seclion 4. Effective Date. This Orclinance shall be in full force and effect fve days after qublication
' of this Ordinance or a summary thereof oecurs in the official newspaper of the City as provided bY law.
PASSED by the City Cuuncil this day ofMarch, 2006.
ATTT'ST:
17iatta Wiihite, iviayor
City Clerk, Christine Bdinbridgc .
Approved as to Form:
Office ofthe City tlttorney '
Date of Publication:
Effective laatc:
Ordinance 06-006 Repealliig 05-015 Pagc 1 of 1
, CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
~ Request for Council Action Meeting Date: March 28,"2006 City Manager Sign-off:
Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legisla'tion
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Second Reading Proposed Ordinance 06-007, Repealing Portions of
SVMC 10.30.060
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: SVMC 10.30.060
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: The City Council, as codified in SVMC 10.30.060
adopted the Spokane County Zoning Code in its entirety. The Council also passed Ordinance
05.015 which renumbered various sections of the existing SVMC. On January 24th, 2006 the
Council referred this matter to the Planning Commission for review. The Planning Commission
has finished its review, including conducting a public hearing and has forwarded the matter to
the City Council without any recommended changes. At the March 21, 2006 council meeting,
Council approved advancing this ordinance to a second reading. . .
BACKGROUND: In adopting the entire Spokane County Zoning Code, a number of zone
designations were adopted that were not applicable to the City of Spokane County. Other
sections wzre sections adopted by the county but never used or applied by the City of Spokane
Valley. The first ordinance will simply repeal those chapters that are not applicable. The
second ordinance repeals, for now, the ordinance renumbering specific sections of the SVMC.
The City staff is in the process of developing an entirely new development code to be
considered by the City Council. This numbering system will be used, at least in part, in the
development of fhis cflde. However, it currently creates conflict between existing sections of the
code and could confuse code users. The ordinance is being repealed to assist in an orderly
transition to the new UDC.
OPTIONS:
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Motion to approve ordinance 06-007.
BUDGETlFINANCIAL IMPACTS: NA
STAFF CONTACT: Mike Connelly
` ATTACHMENTS: Ordinance 06-007
nKaFT
CITY OF SPOKANT- VA1.LEX
SPOK11`E COUNTX, Wr1SHln`GTO\T
ORDINA~1'CE \`O. 06-007
AN ORnT.Nr1NCE OF TM'E CI'lY OF SPOKANE VALLLY, WASFITNGTUN,
RF,FFALhNG PORTiQNS OF SPOKA\xE VALLEY ANN1Cll'AL CODT SLCTION
10.30.060 AS ESTABLIS.HFn ]3Y SPOKr1\TF Vr1C.LEY nRDINANCE 03-053
RELATIITC: TU CERTAIN GONIIVG CLAS51'ICATIOIVS, 1'ROVCI)1NG F()IZ
SrvLRABa,Trv, Avll ESTaBr.:TSFC[NG AN FFFFC'TIVE llATF.
NN'HERFAS; The CiCy Council adopted Ordinance 03-053 on titaech 25, 2003, 'which was
codified in part in the Spokane Valley Viunicipal Code Seclion 10.30.060 and whicli adopted specific
portions of the Spol:aile County 7oning Code speeifcally sections 14.100-800, and Spokane County
Phase One regulations; and
WNFR.FAS, City staff has identified specif.ic sections nF the adopted Spokane County "Loning
Code aild Phase One Rctulations that have no corresponding zonc within the City oF Spokane Valley, are
not refleciive of the provisions of the applicable Interim Comprehensive Plan or Map adopted by the City
of Spokane Valley, or are not regulations or eontrols used or relied upon by the City oF Sp4kane Valley;
and
VVHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Spokanc Valley is in the process of adapting its own
Comprehensive Plan and Development Regulaeions to implement that plan; and
WHF.REA.S, this Ordinance is necessary in drder to facilitate public understanding of the
applicable dcvelopment cnde during this transition period and eliminate all provisions that are no longer
_J applicable or necessary prior to the establishment of the new compreliensive plan and develapment
regulations; and
WTTFR.T'AS, the following provisions are nccessar}= to procect the health, safety, ancl welfare of
the general public and the e.nviromnent;
\`OW, 1W.REFORE, the Ciiy Council of the Cily of Spokane Valley, Wa.shington; ordains as
follo"vs:
Seetion 1. Repeal of nortions of the SDokanc Countv "Loning Code as sdouted bl' SVMC
10.30.060. Spokane Vallcy Municipal Code Seetion 10.30.060 is hercby amended by repealing in their
entirely the followino, chapters of the adopted Spokane County Zoning Code:
I.. Section 14.609, Rurfll Residential 5
2. Sectinn 14.633, Lxclusive Agrieultural
3. Section 14.642 Rural Scttlement
4. Sectiqn 14.643 Urban Reserve Gone
5. Section 14.644 Forestry
6. Section 14.70$ NeighborhoocUCommunity Overlay
7. Sectipn 14.412 Solar Iaevelopmenls, and
- ~ 8. Section 14.820 Bonus Density for Sewer Hookup.
Ordinancc 06-007; Repealuie portions nf 10.30.060 . Paee 1 of 2
nRtFr
Section 2. Reneal of pnrtions of tiie Sookane Counri, Pha.se One llevelooment Kep-ulations .
as adonteci bv SVMC 10.30.060. Spokane Valley Iviunicipal Code Section 10.30.060 is hereby amended •
by repealing in their entirely tihc followins sections of the adoptecj Spu}:ane Cnunty Phase One '
Developlnent Rcgulations: 1. Section 14.824, Rural Cluster Development;
2. Section 14.609, Ctural R.csidential S;
3. Section 1=4.638, Exclusive Agricultural;
4. Section 14.644; Forestry;
5. Section 14.643 Urban Reservc 7one; and
6. Section 14.646 Rural Conservation.
Section 3. Severabilitv. [f any scction, senCence, clause or phrase of this ordinaiice shall bc
held to be itivalid nr unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or
unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or const:itutionality of any other section, sentence, elause or
phrase of this orciinaaice.
Section 4. Effeccivc Date. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect five days after
publication of this ordinance or a summary thereof occurs in the official newspaper of the Ciry as
prnvided by laNv. _
PASSED by the City Council this day of viarch, 2006.
Diana Wilhite, Mayor
ATTEST:
Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk
Apprmred as to Form:
Offce of the Ciry Attorney
Date of Fublication:
rffective Date:
Ordinance 06-007; Repsaling portions nf 10.30.060 1'age 2 nf2
C17Y OF SPOKAfVE VALLEY
Request for Council Action . 'I
Meeting Date: fViarch 28, 2006 " C ity fktla nage r S ign-off~
Item: Check a11 that apply: Elcans~!nt Mald business ❑ new business 0public Freadng
information ❑ admin. repork ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Proposed Resalution, Authorizing submittal of the Comrnunity
Economic Revitalization E3oartl Final Grant Application
GOVERNING LEGISLATIOfV: ,
PRE1fIDUS COUh1CIL ACTION TAKEhl:
BACKGROUND: The Washingtan State Community Econornic Revitalization Board (CERB)
requested gran# applicatiorrs for public infrastruc#ure projects thet stimulate economic
davelopment resulting in the crea#ion of new jobs ar the retention af existing jobs. Yhe City
submitted a pre-ap plication on January 6, 2006. The C ity's applica#ion vve s approved for the
development'of a firral application vfhicYr must be subrnifted by Aprkl 3, 2006_ Attached is a
raugh dra#t of the frral appl[cation_ This is a u+ork in progress and is about 60°lo complete a# this
time_ 1+Ve wi l! bring en updated dra ft to the meeting on Tuesday rrrght_ 1Ne do not artticipate
completing the final app3icatron u n t il March 31, 2 006.
OPTIORVS: RECOMMENDEQ ACTION OR MOTION: Approve the resolution authorizing submittal of the
final gi-arit application #o the Washington State Communi#y Econornic, Revitaliza#ion Board_
BUDG ETfF] HANCIkL 1M PACT& The estimated budget and funding sources outlined in the
grant appFication show the proposed budget a n d financial impac#s to th e City, '
BTAFF CONTACT; Neil Kersten
ATTACHMEPITS Resalution authorizing subrnittal of the grant
Rough Draft -Cornmunity Econornic Revitalization Boarrl Gran# Application
I
C1TY OF SPOKA'E VALLEY
SPOKANE CQITiYTY, Wt1SH:C\iCTUN -
IZESOLUTION NO. 06-002 A RESOLUTION AUTHU121ZLNC THE APPLICATIO\° FOR GRA\`T I+IJNDS
THuzOUGt1 TtE COm:tviUN17Y ECONOiviiC REviraLIZATioN sOARD JoB
DEYE1.01'1viE1vT FiJNn PROGR4ivI TtELATL~1`G TO POTE\7TlAl. EX°I'ENS1ON OF
Al'PLE«'AY }30UT.FVA.RD.
WMEftEAS, the City Council has an obligation to manage the financial resources of the City in a
way that maximizes those resnurces; and
NN'HEREr1S, Washington State opcrates the Community Ceonomic Development Revitali°r.ation
Board (CERB) Job Developmenti Fund Program, which provides grant funding for certain projects; and
WHE1tEAS, the City CoLmcil believes the potential extension of Appleway Baulevard,
improvements to SpraguE Avenu-r, and the construction/improvements of associated crass-streets, all
between University Roaci and Eve.rgreen RoacJ will generate economic development; and
WHTR.I:AS, the CrRB program ~uidelines reyuire that request'ing jttrisdiction adopt a
resolution authorizing staff to apply for a-ant funding uncler the program; and
NVHEREAS, this authorizntion is in the interest of promoting the healdi, safety, aiid welfare of
the citiz,ens ot' Spokane Valley;
NOW TI-iER-E_FOR-E; be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Sp4kane Valle.y, Spokane .
Counry, VVashington, as follows: . .
Scction 1. Authorization to Aaalv for Grant Funds. The City Council authorizes City staff
to apply to the Commwiity Economic 17evelop►nent Revitalization Board (CrR.B) Job Development Fund
Proorani for grant funding to apply to the extension of the Anpleway I3oulevard and improvements Co
Sprague Avenue from University Rpad to Evergre:en Road and the construction and/or improvements oC
associlted cross-sxreets between Uiiiversity Road snd Evergreen Rovd.
Section 2. Fffective Date. This Resoltition shall be effective upon adoption.
Adoplcd ehis day of March, 2006.
City of Spokane Valley
Uiayor Taiaiia Wilhite
ATTrST:
Cicy Clerk, Christine Bainbridge
. Approved as to Form:
Off ce of the Cicy Atcarney Rcsolotion 06-002, CE1ZB
1
COMMUNITY ECONOMIC REVITALIZATION BOARD
JOB DEVELOPMENT FUND PROGRAM
, -
FINAL APPLICATION FOR FUNDING _
PART I-APPLICATION SUMMARY AND CERTIFICATION (use tab key to move throuqh tables)
Applicant/Lead Applicant Federal Taar
Entity: City of Spokane Valley Number: 71-0914170
Contact: Neil Kersten, AIA Title: Public Works Director
Phone Number: (509) 921-1000 FAX: - (509) 921-1008
Email Address: nkersten@spokanevalley.org
. Mailing Address: 11707 E. Sprague Avenue, Spokane Valley, WA 99206
Co-Applicant Entity: N1A
Co-Applicant Contact: Phone Number:
Co-Applicant Entity:
Co-Applicant Contact: Phone Number:
Project Name: Valley Corridor - Project 2
Location of Public Project: Spokane County
r~ Pu61ic Project Description: Extend Appleway Avenue from University Rd. to Evergreen Rd.
Construction Project Period: 4/1/2008 throush 8/15/2009
Legislative District: 4'b Congressional District: 5`"
Tofal Public Facilities Projec! Cost: $ 14,092,000
• Amount of Job Development Funds Requested for the Public Facilities $ 4,650,000
Project (must be minimum requireao:
• Amount from Other Sources for the Public Facilities Project: I$ 9,442,000
I Total Anticipated lnvestment in the Privafe Secfor Business Project: 51,300,000
DECLARATION
I hereby certify that the information given to the Community Economic Revitalization Board in
this Job Developmenf Fund Program application is true and correct to the best of my knowledge
and belief. Signature of Responsib/e Offi-cial: ,
Name (typed or printed): Dave Mercier -
Tit/e: City Manager Date:
ApplicantlLead Applicant must attach a resolution authori2inq fhis application and must attach similar resolutions obtained from each co-applicant.
C:0ocuments arod SeUingslCBainbridgs.Sf'O1:ANL-VAL1.fiY1ApcaI SettinyslTemporsry lntcrncf FileslpLK4l\'allcy Corrictar Praject 2- JDP Application
12-1-05 FINAf..150C
_ 2
PART II-PUBLIC SECTOR PROJECT INFORMATION
This part of the application focuses on the public facilities project for which JDF Program resources are sought. It is divided into several sections. 8efore completing this part, please review the program
guidelines for a list of eligible pubJic facilities and for information on houv project applications will be
evaluated and scored.
Section A-Project Description
Please attach a srte map of the. project area. ldenfify the /ocation of the site, the location of existing and
proposed infrastructure and the location of the private development projecL Specifica!!y identify the
location of infrastructure that is proposed for JDF assistance. NOTE: Materials must be reproduced in
black and white and in an 8%" x 11 " formaL Please do not staple or bind application other than with a
clip binder or rubber band (see Guidelines).
1. Describe the entire public facilities project including the elements of the project that require JDF
Program assistance and those that do not.
NVhen Spokane Valley incarparated in Marah 2003, the new city uiherited the Vallcy Couplct
Project. This Preject was developed by Spokane County to relieve cougestion and provide eapdeity
for future growth along Sprague Avenue through the center of the vallcy's business district.
Spokane County complctcd the first phase from 1-90 to University Road in October 2001. Sprague
AvE•nue became a one-way weslbound (ive lane arterial and Appleway Roulevard was constructcd
and became a one-way eastbound four lane arterial.
The City is currentl>> preparing a NEPA em+ironmental evaluation and alternatives analysis for the .
ecantinuation O1'the projeet four miles furkher ea,_~k. Prelunitlary- study results shovv a necd to extend .
Appleway east oE University to relieve exisiana congestion at hwo major intcrsections and provide
additional capacity for fiiture traffic volumcs. 1"hc cxtension of Appleway F3oulevard wnuld be
NAttuu the abandoned Old Milwaukcc Railroad Right-of-lVay currently Awned by Spokane County.
Final arrangcmcnts are currently being made to transfer this right-o.f.-way to liie City of Spokane
Valley for lransportation purposes.
"1'he project consi;,ts of sereral elements. "I`he.f.~rst element is the eYtension of Appleway IIoulcvard
nN,o miles east f,ram its current terminus at Un.iversity Road to Evergreen Road. TrafFc modeling
and alternative analyses are curre.ntly being done ta determine if the extension of Appleway
Boulevard should be a three lane one-way ea.sibound arierial or a ihree laaie two-tivay a.rterial. A
public involvcment process is propased to assist in che final detern-iination ofithe preferred
alternative.
• The second element is to physically aiid acsthctically improve Sprague Ave.nue behween Un.iversity
Road and Evergreen Road to accommodale alternative nlode facilities, such as bike la.ncs; and
improved pedestrian faciliries, such as wider sidewalks scparated fram the flow of fraffic. Methods
fAr reducing the number of collisions along lh.i.s portion of SpragLie Avenue will also be evaluated
includ'uig the potential for access and/or mcdian cantrol.
Si.nce Sprague Avenue and the proposed eYtension of Applcway Boulcvard are seParated by
640'aud the goal is to providc improved development and redevelopment opportun.ities, the project
also includcs thc construetion ancUor improvemenE of Fbur cross streets; Moffit Road (proposed),
_ iJnion Road, KAhie R.oacl, and Leta Road (proposed). The addition of tliese cross stree•Ls provides C.'tiDocuntents at1d SeriingslCBainbridge.SF'OKr1NEVALLEY1Luc:il SeltingslTemPar~ry lnmmct Filcs0dtiAlValley Corridor Projcct 2-1DF Application
12-I-05 FINAL.DOC
3
unprovecl traf=fic circulation berwe.en Spragiie Avenue and Appleway Boulevard on a minjmum of
. a one quarter.-mile spacing. .
- Spokane Valley is aggressively moving forvvard wi[h the hiring of a lanci use/transportation
planvin;ir c.onsultant team to evaluate the Sprague/Apple•way corridor and la develop a Subarea
Plan. '17he Subarea Plan will refuie the land use and transportation infrastructure oi'the proposed
Ci[y Centcr and Mixed i.)se corridor identified in the city's dra.ft Comprehensive Plan. The Public
Works Departmeut and the Community lllevelopment Department will coOrdinatE the NEPA
environmental analysis described above for the ea-tension dFApplcway,,N7th the Subarea Planning
cffort to brina ContExt Sensitive Solut.ions to this project. Tlvs proccss -wzll heJp deierminc whether
the extension of Appleway will bc a two-way arterial or an extension of the cxistin; Couplet.
2. ldentify the specific elemeni(s) of the project that will be supported by the JDF Program funds
rcquested.
Since funds are already available for the environmental and design phasE of tlus proje.el, the
requcsted JDF Program fi:unds will be useci tn c.over a portion of the proposed right-of-way
acquisitiou and construction costs. Since the extension of AppleNvay I3oulevard is proposed ta be
located witlun aii aba.ndoneti railroad right-of-«ray, there is a minin,um amoun[ of additional, right-
of way neeciing to be purchased.
3. Wrll the proposed public facilities project:
Upgrade an existing facility? 0 Yes ❑ No
Build a new one? B Yes ❑ No
4. What is the current assessed valuation of the area thaf would be served by the JDF-assisted
infrastructure?
~ {Can Connie provide this?}
5. !f the proposed JDF public project involves telecommunications services required by the privaie
business, please explain why a private te/ecom service provider cannot, or will not, provide these `
services. NOTE: CERB policy regarding telecommunication investments is includcd in the
guidelines. '
This project does not involve telecom.munications services.
C:IDncuments atid 5cttings'%CBain6ricige.SFO3:AAiL'VAI.LEV1l..oesl Se:itinesl7'emporary Internet FileslfJLF:41Valley Comdor Projeot 2- JpF Apnlieation
12-1-05 PINAL.DOC
a
Section B-Budget
Please attach cost estimates for the total project and for the JDF portion as prepared by an engrneer.
Also complete and attach the "Sources and Uses Form." NOTE: CERB will not enlertain reguests for
additional JDF Program funding if projections are insufficient. .
9. Indicate when the cosf esfrmates were prepared and explain why they provide a rea/isirc estimate of
project costs. Since this was inilially a Spokane County project, we have been tivorking wit:h Spokane County
staff on estunatiug the cost fnr t:he continuation of this projcet. 1'he most recent cost estimate for this project was preparcd in Jaiiuary 2006. ]?revious esti.maees from Spokane County have becn
updated to reflee•t the current Spokane Area bidding cliuiate. 2. Will the applicant maintain the public facilities after construciion is complefe? Please explain.
Yes; Spokanc Vallcy will maintain the public f~acility after construction is complcte. Once thc
pr.oject is eompleted it will bc incorporated into the city's annual street maintenance program.
3. What source of funding will be used to maintain the pu6lic facilitPes once built?
Spokane Valley currently budgcts approYiuiaLely $4 million lo mainiain the existing streets wiihin
the city. These fuaids will be used to maintain the eYtension of A.ppleway onc;e it is campleted_
4. Indreate the projected annual operating cost of the proposed public facilities project.
S 75,000 to 100,000
C:1Documcatits and SettingslCBainhridge.SPa[:.4?dI:VA].I.EYlLocal ScttingslPempornry lnternet Fi1esl01,K4lVa1ley CAyrridor Froject 2- JDr Aprlication
12-1-05 P[NIAL.DOC
5
Sources and Uses Form
' Sources of Public Sector Proiect Financinq
, .
JDF Program Funding Request: $4,650,000
Other Funds:
NOTE: 67% of the total public project funding musi come from sources other than the
CERB JDF Program. Other sources may include local, federal, other state, and private
funds ihaf will be dedicated to funding the public project. $9,442,000
List a!J other sources. " !n-kind match may only be counted as part of nonstate
contributions.
Local Match Source(s): Committedl Purpose Cash !n-Kind -
Pending Amount Value ,
Citv of Spokane Valley I Committed pE, RW, CN I S589,000 S .
Spokane County ~ Committed RVJ Is S2,013,000 ~
I I I$ I$ I
I I I$ I$ I
Private Source(s): I$ I$ ~
I$ I$ I
I I$$
I I$ $
~ Federal Source(s): ~ I$ I$
~ STP(U) ~ Committed PE, RW, CN $4,670,000 I $
I I I $ I$
Other State Source(s): I I 1 s I
WSDOT ~ Committed I PE, CN I $470,000 ~
Transportation Improv. 8oard I Pending I CN I S1,700,000 (
"Nofe: The nonstafe sources may inNude cash, the value of real property
acquired solely for the purposes of the project and in-kind contribufions. TOTAL PUBLlC SECTOR PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES
NOTE: This amount should equal fotal public secior project costs (below). $14,092,000
Uses of Public Sector Proiect Financinq
List all pubJic sector project costs in the following categories:
~ Preliminary En_qineering Report I $250,000
~ Design En,q. ineering ~ S 628,000 . ~
LandlRight-of-WayAcquisition I S 3,318,000 ~
Othel FCES (please providc deta!!) 1
/nspection/Consiruction $ 879,000 ~
Continqencv (20%) $ 1,464,000
WA State Sales Tax (WSST) • InGuded
Construction I $ 7,553,Od0 • ~
- Labor $ ~
~ - Materials $ ~
- Othef (please provide tletafl) ~
- COntr?CtS (please provfde detail) ~ S ~
- Othef (please provfde detal!) ~ S (
~ TOTAL PUBLlC SECTOR PROJECT COSTS
NOTE: This amounf should equaJ total public sector project funding sources (above). $14,092,000
C:IDoc.umenU and SettingciCBainbridgc_SPO}:.M°tiVAI„I,FYIL.oca! Settingsl'I'anporary Intemet Pi1esl0L}:41Va11ey Comdoir Projeet 2- dDP Application
12-1-05 FINA1.,170C
6
Section C-Economic Capacity and Financial Need
This section examines lndicators of economic vitality and the appJicant's general fnancial status to determine the need for JDF Program assistance. In addition, this section provides information
necessary to defermine whether the required rinancing gap is evident and justified. NOTE: Please
complete and attach the "Applicant Three-Year Financial Trends Form" as part of this section. To
demonstrate financial need when the project involves co-applicants and public project construction in
more than one jurisdiction, each co-applicant must complete this section and the "Applicant Three-Year
Financial Trends Form."
1. Describe the current level of economic activiry and vitality in your communify. Use your own /ocal data
and observations, and data fiom state agencies, such as, the Washington State Departments of: Labor
and lndustries, Employment Security, and Social and Health Services. Address what economic factors arc
affected (i.e., current business activity, family issues, new business development). Describe how the
proposed projeci will benefit these concerns. Some additional factors to consider in this assessment arc
the local effects of.• • Population changes • Out-of-area emp/oyment • Declrne in local revenues
• Job Josses • Use of spECfaJ lunch programs in • Changes in per capiCa
(currenUprojected) schools income
• Wage rafes • Social service impacts 0 School enroJlments
• Unemployment rates • Use of food banks • Use of food stamps
T'he population and employment conditipns of the region describe who livres in a region, t6eir age, their income, and their ;
commuting babits. 7'tlese socio-economic charac.ce.ristics prqvide-inf'orrnation on the opporhinities and constr3ints for
development in the area_ Spukane Valley is part of a reaional economy th3t includes the City of Spolcane. As such, it will
influence and be intlucnced by what happens in the region.
POPULATION TRENDS
The estimated population of the City or Spokane. Valley was 78,577 in 2000. Because Spokane Val.ley was not uicorporated
in 2000, Census data were not availablc for the Lity of Spokane VaIJey. I.nstead the estimate was compiled from Census
II'aCL.5.
Table 1 shows populatioii in the City of Spokane Valley, the Ciry of Spoksne, snd Spokane County in 1940 and 2000.
Populstion in the City of Spakane Valley has growi at a rate below [hat fur the Cow►ty as a w}iolc, but higher than that f'or
the City of Spokxne.
Table 1. Population in the City of Spokane Valley, the
City of Spokane, and Spokane County, 1990-2000
• Percent
1990 2000 Growth Growth
City of Spokane Valley 70,696 78,577 7,881 11.1%
City of Spokane 177,196 196,143 18,947 10.7%
Spokane Countv 361,364 417,939 56,575 15.7%
Sauros: US decennial census data, 1990 and 2000. Gravrth and percent growth calculated by ECONorthvresf„
Population at the time of incorporarion of the City of Spokanc Valley, March 31, 2003, was 80,693 and had gro«v to 85,010
as of April 1, 2005. The populatioa of the City of Spokane Vallcy is prnjccxed to graw to 89,000 by 2012.'
~ Washingtpia State l3ounclat-y Review Boarcl for Spokanc County, May 2002.
C:11aocumcaiis and ScttingslCBainbridgeSPO}:fWLVALLLYII_ocal SettinglTempurtuy Intemrt Piles101,K41VaUey Comclor f'rojcct 2- JI)F Applicatian
12-1-05 FINIAL.(7pC
. 7
HOUSEHOLD INCOME
_ Table 2 sliows income lcvels far die City of Spokane Valley and sele-r.ted regions in Spokane Valley. `I1e data show [hat
median household and f'amily inconte in Spokane Valley is higher than thc Cowity median, but Imver thati tbe state median.
The dat~1 for regions (subareas) in Spokane Valley indicate the Cicy has areas that have. mediaii incomes both higher and
lower than the County average.
Table 2. Income for the City of Spokane Valley and selected regions
in Spokane Valley, 2000
Spokane
Valley County State
Category Median" Median Median
Households $40,309 $37,308 $45,776
Family $47,384 $46,463 S53,760
Median Median
fe.qions in the City of Spokane Valley Household Family'
Yardley Area*' $29,680 $40,941
Millwood Area (Eccluding Town of Millwood)" 30,995 38,091
Dishman-Mica Area (Some UA)" 45,584 54,307
OpportunityArea" 38,454 44,677
Veradale-Shelley Lske Area (Some UA)" 45,052 50,722
Greenacres Area (Some UA) 38,710 42,282
Trenfivood Area . 37,870 44,313
Otis Orchards-East Farms Area (Some UA) 42,891 46,068
Source: A Deniographic 3rrd Econnmrc Ana;ys,rs ior ths Crty ot Spokaraa yafley, Granf Forsyth, July 2003 -
Data based on 1999 reported income -
UA - Urbanized Area
Households csn include singke-person househokis; families are related individuals residing tagetfier
"tvtedian values estimated using a trzightetf averege of inedian family income for the Cit}r of Spokane Valley
Increases in household income generally mean uncreases in disposable household income. Disposable household income
creates demand for rctail goods and senices. Increases in income, eumbined with population groNvtll, will increase the overall
market forretiil in Spokane Valley.
EMPLOYMENT TRENDS
Between 1981 and 2001, cnvered employment in Spokaiie Cou:nty grew by 57%, from 120,882 jobs to 189,987 johs.2 In
1931, Spokaile County accouneed for 7.5% of jobs in the state. HoWever, by 2001, [6at amount had decre.ased to 7'%, showing
that Spokane County has ac4cted jobs at a s]ower rale Chan the rest of the stale. Services, public administration; and retail trade
aceount ror o4er 67°/u of total cuvered employmr.nt in Spokane County. 'I'he ciistribution of employrncnt by sector in Spokane
Counry is similar to that a[ Waslungton State.3
'I'able 3 shows e:mployment for sclected sec[urs for 1998 snd 2001. Prom 1998 to 200 1, the bulk of the job increase was in
che Serviees sector, which incrr.3sed etnployment by 5,612 or ]0.4°/a. Ivianufacturing was ttie only sector tn loscjobs, with ao
employment decrease nf 6_4%.
2 Covered entploymcnt is employment that is covcred by unemplo}rr►cnt inssirance.
31Vtuhington Emplo)nnent Deparmient ES-202 c131<L
C;ll:?ocurnent,e erid SettingstCBainbridpe.SPaKfWEVALL1:Yll,ocal Settingsl'1'cmpornry Internet riles10LK41Valky Corridot Pmject 2- JDF Applir,RYion
12-1-05 F]NAL.DpC
8
Table 3. Covered employment by selected sector in. Spokane County, 1998-2001
1998 2001 Percent
Employment Employment Growth Growth
Construction 9,331 9,995 664 7.1%
Finance, Insurance, & Real Estate 10,653 10,869 216 2.0%
Manufacturing 21,846 20,455 -1,391 -6.4%
Retail Trade 34,989 36,418 1,429 4.1%
Services 53,814 59,426 5,612 10.4%
Transportation & Public
Utilities 7,305 7,638 333 4.6%
Totai 137,938 144,801 6,863 5.0%
SOurCe: Washing4on Emplayment DepaRment. ES-202 data. Growth and percent grovrth cabculated by ECONorfhwest.
In 2000: Spakaric Vallcy Mad nc.arly 3,000 6rms that employed 43,305 people. Average annual pa}roll per employee was
about $29,000. 'Che majority of employers in Spokane Valley are small (71 % have fewer than 10 employees). More than
ihrce-quxrtcrs of employment falls in che following sectors:
• Ret:ai 1 i.rade (16%)
• Constr.uction (13%). • Heallh care and soc•ial ser>>ices (10%)
. • Wbolesalc trade (9%)
• Othcr seniccs cxcluding public administration (9%)
• Manuf'acturi.ng (7%)
• Professianal, scientifiic and tecbiucal services (7%)
• Accommodation and -food services (61/6)4
7'he data above represent establishments that have onc or more cmployees. Howevcr, mnst businesscs do not have 3ny
employees. According to data from the 2000 Ccnsus, 65% pf ihe 33,119 businesses in Spokane Cnunty did not have any
cmployces. 7hc 21,420 non-employer frms in Spokane Councy reported gross reccipts Uf about S777 million, or $36,000 per
business.s'I'hese fgures sue,,gest a local economy that is ciominated by sole proprietors (businesses with no employees).
WORK AND COMMUTING
Conunute patterns are useful in identifying where people live and woek. 'Cable 4 shows cravel tirne for commutcrs in 1he City
of Spokane Valley, the City of Spokane and Spohane County. 17be data show no significaot difference benveen the
distributions of commuting tirnes for nsople in Spokane Valley or i.n the City of Spokane.
Table 4. Travel time for commuters, 2000
Less than 10 to 19 20 to 29 30 to 39 40 to 59 60 minutes
10 minutes minutes minutes minutes minutes and longer
City of Spokane
Valley 15.8°k 39.2% 24.3% 13.4% 4.3% 3.1 %
Clty of Spokane 15.6% 42.1% 24.1% 11.2% 3.9% 3.1%
Spokane Countv 14.7% 36_8% 25.0% 14.1% 6.0°fo 3.4%
Source: US decennial census data, 1990 and 2000.
° A Demogrcr,phic A►ral)wis jor the Ciry oJSJwkane Ilalley, Grant Forsyth, Institute for Public Policy, Eastem Wa,shington University, luly
2003.
5 Ibid.
C:1Documcnis and ScttingslGliainbridge.St'OKr1NEVALLEYI[.ocal SettingslTemporaiy liitemet Filesl0LIC41Valley Corridor Pmject 2- JDF Applic,ation
12-1-05 FINAL_DOC
9
Table 5 shoH^s tlie place 4f°work in 2000 for residents in SpoRane Valley, Spokane City, and Spokane County. '["tie data
suggest thac a larger perc.e.ncage of Spokane Valley residents work in a clififerent place. This is cotlsistent with Lraffic data that
su;gest that the Sprague Corridoe is a major commute comclor.
Table 5. Place of work, 2000
Spokane Valiey Spokane City Spokane County
Category Number Percent Number Percent Numbcr Percent
Living in a place 22,912 65.5% 88,299 'i00.0'/0 137,747 72.40/o
Living in a pface; vrorked in
place of residence 3,067 8.8% 63,462 71.9% 72,630 38.0% '
Living in a plaoe; worked
outside place of residence 19,845 56.7% 24,837 28.1% 65,117 34.1%
Not living in a place 12,067 34.5°/a 0 0_0% 53,448 28.0%
Total 34,979 100.0a/o 88,299 100.0% 191,195 100.0°io
Source: US decenni2l census data, 2000.
The Census data suggest that a signifieant percentaee (50% or more) of n;sidents work outsiclc of Spo}:ane Valley.
2. For the county where the public sector project will be constructed, how many people are in the labor
force (i.e., how many workers are in the county) and what is the unempJoyment rate?
Number in labor force: 230,700 Date: January 2006
Unemployment rate: 5.6% Date: January 2006
3. What is the population of ihe county? Population: 436,300 Date: 411105
4. Explain why JDF Program assistance is needed for this project and why other funds are not avaiJable to finance the project. Please address your overaJl annual budget, debt capacity, capital
improvement plans, as well as the other state, local, federaJ, and private rssources you have
investigafed.
Spokane Valley incorporated iu Marc.h 2003. Our i.nitial yeRr oFoperation was fundeci with major
start-up loai-is which we were able lo repay within twro years. We are ui the process Af building
reservcs ui our General Funcl snd othcr City opsratin; and capital fiinds; however, wc currently do
not have them in place to draw from. 7'he 3-Year Finuncial Ti°ertds F'ornt below shows the City's
e•urrcnt revenue pichire. Tlia[ being said, this project is a comprehensive example of a multi-
partner projcct, ~ritll commitcnents &om the City, as well as Spokane Cowlty, `VSTaOT and fedcral
sourccs as described 'ui the Sources and Uses 1 orm. Jn addition, the City is seekine a comnvtment
- froin the "1`ransportatihn Improveiiient Board.
C:1Documents snd SeMinF;eCI33inbridec.SPOKANEVAI,LEY1Local SettinSslTemparary IniemG Fi1eS10I,K41VaUcy CorriQor Project 2- JDF Applicntion
• 12-1-05 FTNAL.DOC
10
, 5. Will general obligation bonds be used for the construction of the public facilities project?
O Yes 0 No Jf "No," please explain. , \1
Spokanc Valley is leveraging other P-rants anci using existing eity resources such as 12LET funcis for
this projecL Because we are a newly incorporated city, we are limitin; our use of our general
purpose debc caFacit}' UI1f11 wC hcive a longer finwicial track recard tn rely upon for debt repayuient.
6. Will revenue bonds bc used for the construction of the public facilities project?
❑ Yes QNo !f "No,"p/ease explain.
No. This is not a. project for which there is a naturally identifable revenue streain (such as uti]ity
rates) t.hat can bc carrnarkeci to repay a revenuc bond.
7. Please use the following table to provide information about taxing authority and applicant financial
capacity. Use "N/A" if not applicable.
Current Rate Maximum
Authority
Loca/ property !ax per $1000 in assessed valuation: $ 1.598 /$1000 $ 1.60 /$1000 .
Local sales tax: .021 .024 .
Loca/ real estate excise tax (REET): 1/2 of 1°/a 1/2 of 1%
Local business 8 occupation tax (B80): N/A N/A
Local utility tax: N/A NIA
8. Has the applicant jurisdiction ever voted to increase the reguJar property tax rate over the 106% lid?
(See Revised Code of Washington (RCM 84.55 for provisions.)
❑ Yes El No If "Yes," when? Date:
9. !f unused local taxing authority exists, explain why the maximum faxing auihority is not imposed.
Spokane Valley is a newly ivcorporated city. We have created a sLx year financial forecast for our
Ueneral Fund in order to cstablish a clear picture of our clirrcnt resources and expenditw-es. The
next step is to cievelop a business plan for caeh ciEpartment tn icientify dcsircd service levels. Onec
the business plan is developed, the City will evaluate new revenue sources; such as a utility tax,
4vh.ich may be necdcd to sustain lhose service levels. Kegarding the propert), tax rate, Spokane
Valley is at its effective maximum rate for a city that is also an.nexed to a library district and to two .
fire districts. .
C:1Documcnu ajid SeuineslCBtii»bricf„e_SPOKANIEV.4I,I,FY1L,oca1 SettuigslTeatporary lntemec Fi1es\0I.,K41Va11ey CorriQur Ymject 2-1DF Application
12-1-05 FINAL.l7f?C
11'
10. !n general, is the prior year's revenue from focal tax sources (properfy, sa/es, real estate excise, B80
~ and utility taxes) representative of the past rive years experience? .
,
❑ Yes lf "Yes," describe any anticipated future events that would change this pattern.
Q No ff "No," please explain.
Spokane Valle_y has been an incorporated city for only three years (effective 3/31 /03). 'Y here were
only nine months of city activit_y in 2003, the ycar of iuc;twrporadon. 2004 and 2005 are more
reliable representations of the city's qngoing revenuc picture.
11. Was a special property tax assessment (i.e., ULID, UD, IDD or RID) considered as a funding strategy
for this public facilities project?
❑ Yes El No 1f "No," please explain. iN0. This Projcct reflects a significant public-private shared effort. Spokanc County is transfcrrina
right-nr way purchased wilh road ta.Y dollars prior to the City's incorparation, so proger[y ou7uers
have in e.ifecl contributed via their taxes. In addition, tus project has an overall general benefit to
the community. Therefore, tlie i"undino- proposal to eateud Appleway J31vd. leveragcs general
revenues froui the City with various grants i.o recognition of the significant investment needed iTom
the private scctor to iurlher dcvelop the Valley Corridor.
12. Has ihe%urisdiction used authority to form UL/Ds, L/Ds, IDDs or RIDs to make special assessments
,
for capital projects?
❑ Yes 0 No ff "Yes," when?
Date of the last ULID, UD, lOD, or R!D
formed:
Project cost: $
C:11:kocuments and Scttings%CBainlsridge.Sl"C)Kr1NEVALLGI'1Local SetlingslTemporary [ntemet Files'%OLK41Valley Curridor Projcsi 2- JDF Applicatian
- 12-1-05 FWAL.DO(:
12
Applicant 3-Year Financial Trends Form
NOTE: Fach applicanUco-applicant is asked to make modifications to the form that are necessary to
reflect fypical revenue sources, expenditures, and debt capacity associated uvith the type of aAplicant. '
The goal is to provide a picture, based on past trends, of financial capacify and need. Form Prepared By: Brad Johnson, Accounting Manager
Form Prepared For: REVENUE Year 1: 2003"`' Year 2: 2004 Year 3: 2005
Local property tax 61995,965 8,980,837 9,509,339
Loca/sales tax 90981,719 16,531,976 16,868,850
Local business & occupation tax N/A N/A N/A
Otherlocal tax-(Excise) 3,537,370 5,796,164 5,585,593
Otherlocal tax-(Mostly Gambling) 1,269,878 1,103,277 1,033,145
lntergovernmental revenue 70,704,421'2 11,780,126" 4,207,919
Ofherrevenue-(lnterest) 2,290,972 4,131,447 5,487,861
TOTAL 94,780,325 48,323,827 42,692,707
EXPENDlTURES Year 1: 2003*' Year 2: 2004 Year 3: 2005 .
General government 3,486,297 3,359,728 5,171,731 -
Physical security 7,394,944 13,327,807 16,096,633
Other- 13,027,754 20,124,625 15,271,007 .
TOTAL 23,908,995 36,812,960 38,539,371
FUND BALANCE JANUARY 1 Incorporafed 3131103 70,871,330 82,382,997
AOJUSTMENTS - - - -
FUND BALANCE DECEMBER 31 70,871,330 82,382,997 88,536,333
" FOOTNOTES
1) The City of Spokane Valley incorporated on March 31, 2003. The 2003 column reflects nine months of
activity from April through December.
2) Year 2003 intergovemmental revenue includes infrastructure and Park assets donated by Spokane County in
the amount of $70,687,614.
3) Year 2004 intergovernmental revenue includes infrastructure improvements donated by Spokane County in the amount of $3,942,595. C,11?acuments and Seuing,~lGBainbridgc.SPOIGINGVALLE-Y1I,pcal Se11in„slTcmporuy Internr.t FilaslpLK4lVsllcy C;arridor Frojeet 2-.TDF .Applicatiom ,
. 12-I-65 FTNAL,L70C
13
I +
- ASSESSED VALUATION Year 1: 2003°' Year 2: 2004 Year 3: 2005
Total 4,409,259,851 4,527,968,717 5,021,000,000
CITY/COUNTY GENERAL PURPOSE Year 1: 2003!' Year 2: 2004 Year 3: 2005
GENERAL OBLIGATION DEBT CAPACITY
Wifhout a vote (1.50%,.015) 66,138,898 67,919,539 75,315,000
With a vote (1%,.01) 44,092,598 45,279,687 50,210,000
Total (2.5%) 110,231,496 113,199,218 125,525,000
Utility (2. 5%) 110, 231, 496 113,1991218 125, 525, 000
PORT GENERAL PURPOSE GENERAL Year 9: 2003*' Year 2: 2004 Year 3: 2005
OBLIGATION DEBT CAPACITY
Without a vote (114 of 1%, .0025) N/A N/A N/A
W/ith a vote (314 of 1%, .0075) N/A N/A N/A
Tofal N/A N/A N/A
CURRENT GENERAL PURPOSE DEBT Year 1: 2003`' Year 2: 2004 Year 3: 2005
AmountAuthorized 9,430,000
~
Beginning 0utsfanding 9,420,000 9,285,000
Amount Retired 145,000 165,000
Amount Issued 9,430,000
Ending Outstanding 9,430,000 9,285,000 9,120,000
CURRENT REMAINING GENERAL Year 1: 2003"' Year 2: 2004 Year 3: 2005
PURPOSE CAPAClTY Non Voter-Approved 56,708,898 58,634,531 66,195,000
Voter-Approved 441092,598 45,279,687 50,210,000
Tota! 100, 801,496 103, 914, 218 116,405, 000
REMAlN1NG UTlLlTY DEBT CAPACITY Year t: 2003'"l Year 2: 2004 Year 3: 2005
Total 110, 231,496 113,199, 218 125, 525, 000
TOTAL PROPERTY TAX LEVY Year 9: 2003*' Year 2: 2004 Year 3: 2005
Current Collected 6,716,080 9,025,239 9,333,284
TaxReceivable, Dec.31 . 312,859 366,113 435,041
C:1Docvmeaarts und SetlingslCAsinbridge.SPC1KANEVAI.LEY1Local Sciting5\Temporary Intcrnd Fi1esl0LK4lVa11cy Corridor Fruject 2- JDF Applicsiion
12-1-05 FINAL.DOC
14
' FOOTNOTE: 1) The City ofi Spokane Valley incorporated on March 31, 2003. The 2003 column reflects nine
months of activity from April through December.
13. Other public sources of funding for public economic development infrasiructure projects are listed '
below. Indicate the applicable sources that were investigated to fund this project in addition to the
JDF Program. Please provide an outcome statement for all sources fnvestigated. Note: JDF
resources may not be used to supplant financing that is already committed to the project Federa! Programs: Yes lVo Oufcome
• Economic Development Administration X
• USOA-Rural Development X
• USDA-Forest Service X
• US Army Corps of Engineers X
• Environmental Protection Agency X
• Administration for Natrve Americans X
• Bureau of Indian Afifairs X
• Other (please identify) X State Programs: Yes No Outcome
.
Transportation Improvement Board (TIB) X Awarded $4.2M to project .
• Communiry Development Block Grant (CDBG) X Exploring
• Rural Washingfon Loan Fund (RWLF) X
• HUD 108 Loan Guarantee X
• Pu8lic Works Trust Fund (PWTF) X
• Department of Ecology X
• Other (please identify) x
Local Programs: Yes No Outcome
• Local Optron Sales 8 Use Tax retained by Rural X
Counties for economic development purposes (.08)
• Other (please identify) x
Foundations and Nonprofit Corporatfons Yes No Outcome
• Loca! Initiatives Support Corporation X ,
• First Nations Developmeni Mstitute X C:1f)ocumcnt5 And SctiingslCBainbridge.SFOKANEVAI..i.,EYU,ocal Ssttingsl7'emporary Intemet Files10LK41'Valley Carricfor Projeot 2- JDF Applicatian
12-1-05 TINALDOC
. 15
• Affiliated Tribes of Northwest Indians-EDC X
~ • Other (p/ease identify) X
Section D-Planning and Readiness to Proceed
This section focuses on whether the proposed project is consisic»t with /oca/ goals, priorities and
sUategies. !t uvifl also bE used to determine how quickty the project wi116e able to move forward if JDF
Progiam resources are awarded. Note: Please complete and submit the "Se1f CErtification of Growth
Management Compliance Form" rvith this section. To demonstrate planning and readiness to proceed
when the project involves co-applicants and public project constructfon in more than one jurisdiction,
this section and the "Self Certification of Growth Management Compliance Form" must be completed by
each applicant/co-applicant.
1. Mark all plans currently in place and describe how the proposed project is consisteni with each:
a Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy (formerly Overafl Economic Development
Plan)
."I'he City of'Spokiine Valley is in the process ofadopting its first compreMensive plan-since incorporating on
March 31, 2003. 'I'he City's drx(i plan includes an Hconomic Development chapter thal will serve. as the City's
economic development strat.egY. Goal EDC,-1 ajid several of the nolicies inclucied under this goal speak directly
to the "expansion and reten[ion of existing businesses" in the City of Spokane Val lcy. The project proposed
under this grant application will provide awidc range of developmctit and redevelopment opporiunities for
business along this precfominantly commercial and rewil comidor. Tlie City's overall land use conc4:pt envisions
_ transitioning this corridor from commercia]/retail by focusing commercial activity at major intersections; wfiile
encouraginb mixed use including housing, employment, lodging ancl oihcr uses behveen 1:he cnmmercial nodes.
l~ This strategy is designed to encourage a broader economic base for the City, while providing a mix of hotasing
. .i alternatives for residents.
0 Comprehensive Land Use Plan
As noted abovc, ihe City of Spokaiie Valley antieipates adopti.ng iis (irst comprebensive plan in April 2006.
Goals and policies in the City's Tand Use chapter facus on development in the Spraauf:lAppleway Corridor (e.g.
GUG-3, LUP-3.1 and LUP-3.2). The parcel eonfiguration in this area generally eonsists ofelongated lots Lhat
fiont on Sprague Avenue ii.ncf the proposecl Appleway Boulevarcl right of way (the abandoned Old Milwaukee
R.ailroacl ri4ht-of-wav). '1'be construction of the proposed project will provide much neede.d access and street
&ontage to the southem property lines that will greatly enhance the attraetiveness of this area to development and
redevelopment.
a Capital Facility Plan
The City's Cnmprehensive Plan is requirecl by the Washuigton Statc Growth Mana„ement Act lo vtclude a
Capita! Facilities element. 'I'he dr-ift Capita] Tacilities element includes a table (Table 436) that identifies •
transportation capital projects for the years 2006 Lhrough 2011. The subject project is listed a.5 project 45 in Table
4.36. 7'he Ciiy's Comprehensive Plwl aIso includes a Transportation Element that provides policy direction
related to tllis project. Specifically, iransportarion goal TG-8 and polieies TP-8.1 and TP-$.2 support the subject
project.
O Community Action Plan (or other community-based plan) .
Ni/A -
: p Site-speciric development plans; e.g., Port Master Plan
C:1Documcnts and SectingslCBainbridge.SPOI:A~NEVALLEY11,e1cal 5cttingsl"I'empvrary Intcmct Files104KAValley Cotridor Project 2- JDF Appliea[ion
12-1-05 r•INru,.noc
- 16
N/A ' .
O Oiher (p/ease specify) N/A 2. Whenever a state agency is considering awarding grants or loans for a county, city, or town or
special district, the state agency shall consider whether the local government has adopted a
comprehensive pJan and development regulations as required under RCV'V 36.70A. 040- Growth
Management Act (GMA), (RCW 43.17.250). Please complete the self-certification form on the
following page. .
C:0ocumenis and SettinoslC'.Bainbridgc.Sl'0Kt1Nq:VALLGYII_c>c91 ScctingslTcmporary Internet filesl01.K41Valicy Cflrridnr Froject 2- JUF Applicsdon
12-1-05 F[~'AI„pOC
17
Self Certification of Growth Management Compliance Form
Name of Valley Corridor - Project 2 .
Project:
On behalf of Cify of Spokane Valley 1 certify it is a jurisdiction that:
(Name of Jurisdiction7 '
A9ark aN Certifications
that
apply 0 Has adopfed a critical areas ordinance under the Growth Managemenf Act (RCW 36J0A.060).
0 Is required or has opted to plan under fhe Growth Managemeni Act (RCW 36.70A.040).
0 Has adopted a comprehensive plan and development regulations within !he time periods
specified in RCW 36.70A. p Failed to adopt a comprehensive p/an and development regulations within the time periods
specified in RCW 36.70A.040 but did adopt them before submitting this grant/loan request.
El Has demonstrafed substantial progress toward adopting a comprehensive plan or
developmeni regulations within the time periods speciried in RCW 36.70A. (A jurisdiction
more than six monfhs out of compliance with the time periods specified will not be regarded
as having demonstrated subslaniial progress.)
~ 0 !s in compliance with the Grordth Management Act.
J 0 Does not have a current Finding of Non-Compliance (RCW 36.70A.300) or an Invalidity Order
(RCW 36.70A.302) issued by a Growth Management Hearings Board.
1 certify the above information is true and correct to the best of my belief and knowledge. Signed '
Name Niarina Sukup
5
Title Communiry Development Director
Date •
*Applicants for Job Development Fund Program public facilities construction project funding thai are not
planning jurisdictions are asked to forward this self-cerlification to the appropriate local government (i.e.,
the governmental entity with planning jurisdiction over ihe project sife) for completion and signafure.
C:lDocumenis nnd Setting.stCBainbridge.SPOKANEVALLEY1Local Seltin&Al'emporury Inleniet Piles10LKAV'alJey Corridar Nroject 2-!DP elpplicatian •
12-1-05 FINAI.,00C
IS
3. List aJl permits required for the public sector project and give the current status of each (applied for,
application being prepared, permit issued, etc.). NOTE: All pcrmris required fo complete the project
must be secured by July 1, 2007. Public Permit Issuer . Status Anticipated
. Completion Date
Grading I City of Spokane Valley Application to be prepared I March 2007 I
SEPA I City of Spokane Valley Applicaiion to be prepared I March 2007 I
NEPA ~ FHWA IBeing prepared i December 2007
4. !f there are issues regarding any of the environmental permits, please explain them.
The City is curre.ntly prepari.ng a NEPA environiuental evaluation aiid altcrnatives analysis far this
project. Prelinainary ti:ansportation study results show a nccd to cYtend Appleway ea..sl oi
Un.iversity to relieve existing congestion at tNvo major intersections and provide additional capacity
for fuhue traffic volumes. '17he cxtEnsion of Appleway wrould be within the abandoned Old
Ivlilwaukec Railroad right-of-way currently owned by Spokane Cnunty. Final a.rrangeuients arc
currently being made [o transf'er lhis right-o1=way to the city for trailsportation pLU-posES. Because
the propo5ed Praject makes use o:f khe emstin.g railroad right-of-way, muuinal en'vironmental ' .
impacts are ex.pected and a 17ocumented Categorical Laclusion (i7CL) or Finding of vc~ Significant
Impact (rON51) is anticipated.
5. !f environmental permits are not required for the project (e.g., Shorelines Permit, Environmenta!
Impact Statement, etc), please explairi why they are not required.
SEPA and NEPA compliancc is required.
6. /f the project involves site excavation, describe the status of culturaf/historical artifacts
investigations. ,
Tlie project boundaries are entirely }vithiu an already built cnvironmcnt. The United Stales
Department of Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service has caiflrmcd that thc proposed project area doe_s
not include endangered or i.hreale,ned species, as set forth in the federal EndaiIgcrcd Spccies Act of
1973 (ESA). See attached lcttcr. A lcttcr of no efFect is anticipated.
There are no recreational facilities, ]JaPkS, sports centers, etc., adjacent to the prqject.
A Cultur-dl Resources Assessment oClhe cnrridor was prepared 'ui 2001 and found several historic
slructures along Sprague Avenue. In addition recent site uivestigations have revealeti several
resideiices along the Appleway corridor that may qualify as historic structures. An aaditional
resource assessment will be prepared for these slruclures. Proposed improvements along Sprague
Avenue include the -vvidening of sidewalks and the reduction of traffic volumes benefiting the C:1Documents and SetWtoslCBainbridge.SPOKAA`EVALLEYUmcal Sed'rnrslTemPorery Imcmct FiIcs101.i:4\\+a11cy Crnridor Froject 2- JDP Application
12-1-05 FINAL.DOC
• 19
historic structures. 17he improvements alon.g APPIeway will not requi.re the acquisition of right of
way rior impact the potential historic strucriires. ,
,
-Documen/alion will consist o.f: a Nlo Effcct letter, inapping recrcational facilities, and prepa.ration oi:'
w addilional resaurce assessmenl along withapprovals t'YOm thc Sta.te Hisihrie Preservation Office
and affected Tr.ibes.
7. Provide an estimated schedule for complefion of the public project by indicating the month and year
lisied activities have been, or will be, completed.
Activity/Milesione Estimated Completion Date
(m onth/year)
Preliminary engineering report January - March 2006
Obtain a!1 required permits
Design engineering July 2006 - September 2007
Landlrighf-of-way acquisition July 2006 - September 2007 .
Prepare bid documents
Award construciion confract
Begin construction April 2008 '
~ Completo construction August 2009
~
Construction project operational
Other (pfease identify)
Other (please identify)
8. What otherjurisdictions, such as counties, cities, stafe/federal agencies are involved in the planning,
design, financing, construction or operation of this project?
9. Please explain how completion of the project is coordinated befween fhe other involved parties.
C:lDocuntcnts and Scttings~CBainbridoe.SPOKArFL'VALI..}„Y11.ocal Setting.si'1'emporary Intcmct FileslOLX4lVallry Corridor ProjeG 2- JI)F APplieiition
12-1-05 PINAL._DOC
20
Section E-Local Commitment
The applicant must demonstrate community approval, support, and commitment for ihe project, Letters ,
from local organizatfons demonstrating their support and resource commitments are approprlate. Examples include: governments, economic dcvc?lopment councils, chambers of commerce,
businesses, and/or community service organfzations. Attach, as appropriate, copies of other
informafional materials that demonsirate general public support, such as newspaper articles, survey
resulis, and summaries of Aublic meetings or hearinq(s).
1. Please attach the following documents fo show that minimum required levels of /oca/ support have been
achieved:
~ Letter from the Associate Develop,nent Organization (ADO) expressing support forproposed
industrial projects. (See Guidelines, Atfachment C: List of Associate Developmcnt
Organizations.)
~ Letter from the /ocaf government expressing approval for proposed fourism projects.
0 Public notice issued by the applicanf giving the public an opportunity to leam about and
comment on the proposed project before submittal of the final aAplication.
2. Please describe and document any additional demonstration of communiiy and regional support for _
the public sector project and the associated direct orprospect;ve prrvate sector project(s). C:1Documenu und Settinc3lCBainbridgc.SPO"NEVALLEY1Local SettuiSslTerriporary Intemet Filesl0l,K41Vallcy Corridor Project 2- JDr Application
I2-1-05 PiN.AL.DQC
- 21
PART III: PROSPECTIVE PRIVATE SECTOR PROJECT FEASIBILITY
The JDF Program requires: 1) evidence of a committed private sector partner/participant, or 2) evidence
. that the prospective prfvate sector development(s) will occur in the future if the public facility project is
completed. Applications supported by a private secfor partner/participant require a signed Contingency
Agreement and should skip Part lll. Applicants without a committed private sector partner must complete
PART l11. The, applicant must document that the specific economic development outcomes are feasible,
reasonable and likely to occur in a timety manner if the public facility project is completed. 1. Has a feasrbility study for the prospective deve/opment been completed? ❑ Yes ❑ No 1f YES, please submif a copy of the study with the application; use the "Feasibility Study Checklist" below to
confirm the study has covered required elements and to rdentify pages where the iniormation is located; and
provide brief answers to the narrafive questions that follow the checklisf.
Study title:
Study completion date:
Study author/consultant:
If NO, please provide detailed answers to the narrative quesdons that follow the checklist, citing appropriate
data sources to meet the feasibility analysis requirement NOTE: The sufficiency of the analysis wiN be
assessed in relationship to the scopo and complexity of the prospFCtive developmFnt project and is a
consideration in the project evaluation and scoring process.
~ .
Yes No Page FeasibiJify Study Check/ist
❑ ❑ An analysis has been completed that shows if the site is developed as planned, the
desired busincss development outcomes are likely to occur because the developed
sife will meet industry market needs and market demand.
❑ ❑ I Targeted i»dustries are identified. ❑ ❑ Other adequately served vacant industrial land in the area has been identified and
analyzcd and primary reasons are given for selecting the proposed site over any
oiher existinq sites.
❑ ❑ The site's suitability and adequacy for the proposed project has been analyzed by
addressing land use, zoning, environmental restrictions, infrastructure, access, and
distance to markets.
I❑ ❑ Funding required to develop the site will be secured by July 1, 2007. I
❑ ❑ Linkages between the proposed project and other known projects in the area (e.g.,
competinq labor pool, utility dema»d, and other local resources) and effects of the
proposed project on those other projects are identified. .
❑ ❑ A strafegy ihat identifies the group responsible for, and capable of marketing the site
or facility once it is completed is defined.
❑ ❑ An action plan with a timeline for securing all rcquired fundrng and implemeniing the
markefing strategy is included. -
C::1Doeunit;iits and Sctiin-.slCF3ainbriclge.SPOKr1NEVAI.LF,Y1Loeal Setcin6slTempwrory Iniemet FiI*tiCJL.K41Vallcy (:orridbr F'roject 2- JDF Appiicntiun
• 12-1-05 FTNA1..D(7(:
22
All applicants with prospective private sector projects must respond to the following questions. If a ~
feasibillty study has not been completed, provide data and cite sources that support and document :
conclusions drawn in the analysis. !f a feasibiliry study has been completed, provide brief responses to the
questfons based on the study report. . 1
2. What type of business/industrial development is desired in the community and why? Please list sources.
The Valley Corridor wa5 one.e a segment of I-Iichway 10, a major rosd thal crnssed the country connecting Seattle to point~s
east. T1ie businesses that establishecl themselves along the highwsy in what is now Spokane Valley served that highway
traffic. «Fhile rnuch of the retail businesses Ui the Sprague Corricior at this time is in the category of lower-order, less-specialized,
local-serving retail, there are some areas of spfcialiration that have a reaional draw: for eawiple, auto salcs.
I'he pmject shoulci promote the coiltinusd suc.c.ess of'specialty secments, e.c. auto sales and serviccs by clusterin ; such
specialized uses wllenever possible. "Ta restore property values ai1d vitality to the Valley Corridor, a mix of high-quality
residential, office, and lodging uscs are desirable in addition to retail. Land uses, developmenc, and the design of the Spraeue
Corridor must be sigeuficantly restructured to rzflect investor preferences aiid to responct co the real Pattem of clemand in the
. lacal ity.
The most recent veesion of tfie Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plaii: currentlv Ueuig reviewed by the City Council, promotes
concentrating retail at major crossroads of the Vslley Carridor, thus providin-, compact, wall:able, "lifestyle cen[er"/town
center canligurarions. The l.ifestyle center configur'ation includes neighboncood-servinA retail aitcl setvices in limiCeci c.lusters
at strategic locatinns to nrovide conveuient sliops and services within walking distance of homes and/or worl:places. •
A statistie.ally valid suTvey of city residenis shows support for establishino a Ci .ty Center in Spokane Valley and for that City
Center ta be located on the-Valley Corridor. The cleveloproent of a City Center and lifestyle centers on the Valley Corridor
would serve as the catalyst for the revitaliiacion of tfie central section of the Sprague Corridor. .
3. What does fhe targeted sector/business require in terms of community readiness and support (i.e., infrastructure, workforce, etc.)? Cite industry sources that support your conclusrons.
4. Describe the appropriateness of the site or facility that will be devcloped by addressing zoning;
environmental restricUOns; access to infrastructure; water, sewer, road, rail, and electricity; distance to
markets; and, the site's/facilify's capacity to support the anticipated devclopment over time.
5. For industrial projects, provide an analysis of other adequately serviced industrial land Fn the area
and give the primary reasons for the selection of the proposed site over other existing sites. .
C:11)ocumcnts and ScttingslCBainbridge.SPOKANIFVAI,I,N VlLorxl Set[ings1"I'cmporary Intemet FileslOL}:41Vailley CoRidor Nmject 2- JDF Applicatioa
12-1-05 P1N.41,.I)OC
6. How will the targeted industries be recruited to the sitelfacility? Describe the primary activities and
timclines included in fhe marketing strategy.
7. ldentify the party(ies) or organization(s) that will be responsible for implementing the marketing efifort.
Describe their capacity to complete these activifies.
8. Oescribe related investment opportunities that have been lost due to inadequate infrastructure. If
possible, provide defail on ihe type of companies or indusfries that were Jost.
~
9. Oescribe the job development expectations for the project in terms of the number of jobs created
and/or retained, aniicipated wages and how wages compare to county annual average covered
wages and local wage rates for the same type of jobs, opportunities the project may offer to the local
labor force, and other relafed issues. Indicate (where applicable) if a Tribal Fmployment Rights
Ordinance will app/y. (NOTE: For county annual average covered rvage i»formation, go to
http:/fwww.workforceexpJorer.com/admin/uploadedPublications/5585 Pub 2004 AAxls
10. Complete the "Prosp@ctive Private Sertor Project Job Outcome Form" in Part V of the application. Use
the form to identffy and quantffy the measurable private sector job outcomes you expect will result once
the public sector project is comp/ete. '
C:Wvcuments ond Sr.ttings5Cliainbridgc.SPOKANEVAi.LL•Y1Loael Setiing,al'Temporuy Internet Fi1es101.K4Wallry Corridor Project 2- JllF Applicatian
12-1-05 l=L\A1..DOC
PART IV-INIMEDIATEICOMMITTED PRIVATE SECTOR BUSINESS PROJECT
Kmore than one immediate committed private sector business project will occur as a result of the public _
sector projeci, complefe Part IV for each private sector busrness.
Section A-Project Description
Name of Business:
North American lndustry Classification System (NA1CS)
Number:
WA State Unifornr Business ldentifier (UBI) Number.
Name of Primary Business Contact (involved in the
developmentorexpansfon):
Title:
:
Ptione:
FAX`
1 ~ Email:
Name of Altemate Busrness Contact:
, ~Title:
Phone: ~
FAX.~ ~
.
~ ` 1l
Email: V
Business Street Address (current location): ~
. City, State:
Business Mailing Address (currcnt location)~
" Sfrect:
City, State 8 Zip Code:
1. Describe the proposed private business development or expansion project that wou/d be supported .
by the public facilities project.
G:1Dcicument5 enc! Szttin-s1C:E3ainhrid&e.S}'OKAtv"EVALI,f:YV..oml Setting,slTempardry lntemet Filesl0LK41Val1ey Corriclor Prroject 2- JDF Applicatiun
12•1-05 FLNAL.DOC
- 2. Now long has the firm bcen in business?
~
3. Describe the business product.
4. lndicate the product market areas of the proposed facility (i.e., where will the product be sold).
p !n-State
❑ National
❑ International `
❑ Nof Applicable
5. Explain why the private developmenf requires the proposed public infrasiructure improvements
` - - 'described in this application. '
6. Provide an analysis of fhe primary reasons for the selection of the proposed site over any other
adequately served indusirial sites in' ttie area.
C:1Documcnts and SettingstCl3ainbridgc.SPOKANEVA1.i,GYlLocnl Setiin!41Temporary lnicmet FileslOLF:4IVal1ey Corridor Projeca 2- JAR Application
12-1-05 T7NAI...DOC
7. Describe job development expectations for the project in ierms of the number of jobs created and/or
retained, aniicipated wages and how wages compare to local prevailfng wages, opportunities the project
may offer to the local labor force and other related issues. Use ihe "Private Sector Project Job OutcomE: -Form" in Part V to provide additional job outcome data. .
9. What is the county annual average covered $
wage?
10. The JDF Program is prohibited by statute from fundrng projects that ►aould displace jobs in any other
community in the state. Will this projcct displace exisfing jobs_in any other part of the state? NOTE:
A project that retains an existing Washing'_ton businc~ss~a'ncl jobsNat a different location in the state is
permissible when there is evidence the business would leave Washington Siate or cease busine.ss
operafions if the project did not occur. (See definition of retained jobs; ~P. 30.)
. ~
~
_
11. !f the project se'ek to `-`retain"jobs in Washingto» State, there musi be evidence that the company
i-Z t~.~
will move jobs from a current-locatton in Washington to an out-of-state /ocafion if the public project
is not completed.
O Yes ❑ No If'tY¢s," plea'se.exPlarn the cvcumstances.
12. Will the private sector project use local job and workforce development centers for employment and
training assistance.
❑ Yes ~ No PJease explain. .
C:U7ocumencs snd 5cttingS1C13ainhrictse.SPOKANEVALLEY11.oeal Seltrng5lTeenpwary ].nlemet Pi1esl0LF:41V:J1ey C;orridor Projeet 2- JUF Applicatioa
12-1-05 FINAL.170C
Section B-Project Financing
-'1. !s this project addressed in the company's business plan? PJease explain.
2. Describe how the private sector is financing its capital investment project (i.e., loans, cash, stock
sale, etc.). .
~
1
3. List the amounts and sources of fhe.financing for the capital investment project, indicafing the status
and completion date.
Privafe Capital Required Source Status Anticipated
Completion
Da te
$ v
~
,
C:lpocumrnts ajid ScttingslCBainbridge.SPOIGNNFVALI.EY1C.ocal SettinglTempotury Intcrnet FiieOLK4lVallcy Carriclnr Project 2- JDF Appiication
12-1-05 PINA[.DOC
Section C-Planning and Readiness to Proceed
1. What private decisions or authorizations remain prior to proceeding with the proposed private development project?
2. lndicate the construction/capital improvements/expansiori projectschedule (if applicable) for the
proposed private sector business„
Activity/Milestone Month/Year
Project Begins V
Project Completed
Private Faci ty Pro-,-je"ct perational
3. When will the private sector particrpantrs first y~ r of operafion begin?
Month/Year: .
4. Will it be functioning at full capacity`by that year?
v
11 Yes ❑ No If "No," please indicate at what percent ii will
be operating and when it will be operating at
full capacity.
- Percent of full operation.
Month/Year Estimated date of full operation.
.C:1Documenuc tmd SettingslCBainbridge.SP.O}:AtNTVAI,LF.Y1Lflcal 5ettingslTemporaq Intemet Fi1cs10GK41Valley Corriclnr Project 2- JDF t1pplic:ation
12-1-05 F(NAL.DOC
5. List all permits required for the private sector project and give their current status (applied for,
applicatio» being prepared, permit issued, etc.)
Private Permit lssuer Sfatus Anticipated
Completion Date
~ ~ I (
. I I
I I
I n I I
al! environmenta! permits and all environmental
6. Provide an explanation (if applicable) of fhe status of~~
issues.
~ ~ .
7. Does the timing of the JDF project approval process present any issues related to permitting?
plepj~se .
❑ Yes ❑ No "Yeexplain the c;cumstances.
~
. ~
C'V7neurneuU and Secting5lCDainbridp ..SPO}:r1NEVAl,LkYlLocal Settutgsl7'cmporary Internet FileslOL}:4Wmlley Corritfor Projcct 2- JDF rlpplication
12-1-05 Fh\'AL..L7f)C;
Section D-Private Sector Commitment
In order to shorv that a specific private invesiment is ready to occur, but will do so onty if JDF Program assistance is made available to the applicant, a signed Contingency Agreemeni(s) befween the applicant
and the private sector business representative(s) is required. If a developer is involved, there must also be a signed Contingency Agreement between the developer and the proposed ienant. NOTE: A separate
Part /V of ihe application and a separate Contingency Agreement musf be completed and attached for
each private sector entity that is identifred as a justifrcation for requesting JDF Program funding for the
public sector project
1. Explain why the private sector projeci wi!l not go forward without the public sector project.
. `
- ~ ~
~ .
~
C,
. ~ ~
\
C:iDocucnents and SettingslGBainbridgc.SF't)}:ANEVA1,i,EYlLocaJ SettineslTecnporar}, Intemet FilrslQLK4lVallcy Corridor Proj.ct 2- JDF rlpplicaiiqn
12-Ir05 FINAL.UQC
CONT/NGENCY AGREEMENT FORM
Please fo!!ow this format fo produce a Contingency Agreement(s) with the private business partner(s). •
1. PARTlES.
The parties to this Agreement are THE APPLICANT and THE PRIVATE BUSINESS. NOTE: K a developer
is involved in the project, the tenant must also be a paRy fo this agreement or there must be an additional
agreement between the developcr and the tenanL
2. PURPOSE.
The purpose of this Agreemenf is to clarify the intentions of the parties regarding the completion of THE .
PUBLIC FACILlTIES PROJECT. This section should also contain an explanation of the need for the public
improvements.
3. BACKGROUND.
The purpose of this section is to provide a description of the public improvements, which can be
referenced, thereafter, as "required public impr`ovements."
4. AGREEMENT. n
This section must contain the followrng:
~e 1 . .
a. A statement that the appJ. ~cant agrees to construct the require d publrc lmprovements providing that
CERB financing is approved. t
b. A statement by the business of the pro~ecied number of permanent; full-time jobs created andlor
retained as a result of the public facrlities.project. (Aftention: Job estimates identifred here must
equal those in Section\~~~~V ~
c. A statement by the busrness of_the est~mated.private cainvestment.
rkforce Development Council (WDC) and the
d. An agreement by the busin`ess to contact the`ocal,,Wo~~
State Employment Securiry O,e~p~ ment for assist,a`n~cc in filling new positions.
\
e. An agreement by the business to provide the applicant with employment and investment data as
requested by the JDF Program iricluding, but not limited fo, presentation to the Legislature durrng the
legislative process.
. ~
f. If epplicable, ti►is section must also contain a list of any public and/or private confributio»s to the
public facilities project, such as cash contribution or donated land.
5. CONTINGENCY.
This Agreement is contingent upon receipt of JDF Program funds by THE APPLICANT and is intended fo
provide convincing evidence of private development as required by the JDF Program.
All parties must sign the Agreement.
C:11?ocuments tncl SettuioslCE3ainbridge.Sl'OiG\NH VA1,I„MLtx;d SettingslTeanporatY ltttem8t Filesl0LK41Valley Comdor Prnjtxt 2- JDF ApplieAtion
12-I-05 F1NAL.DOC
PAFtT V-ECOND14tlC DFVELOPMENT IMPACTS, OUTCOMES APdD PERFORMAldCE
RE~ORTIfVG
Econ ornfc develapmerrt impacts and oWtcorraes ha+re sigrrificarrt weight 1n the project evaluation arad
scoring process. Please re+riew the guidelrnes before completirrg thls part af the appfr`cafion. !rr addition,
applfcarr#s that receive JDF Prograrrr furrdingr are accourr#abJe far tracklng ecnnamfc devefopmerrt
outcorrres arrd reportirrg therrr ta tire ,lDF Prograrrr staff. Th2 tFsiCking afid FB~ort1ng TESponsibillty .
requires desrgrratirrg a local lead wha wrtl proviafe peraodfc updates an the sta#us arrd outcomes of the
publfc sector prajec#. TPre local lead witt also obtairr periodfc up#ates from the prFva te sector huslnesses
that jus#rtiad the reques# tar fundrrrg arraf from arldf#iorral busfrresses that bene€it from the publlc projec#
fnvestment. The reportiny requirement contirrues foir aperr`od of five years affier the pubfxc sector'p1'ojec#
is comple#e.
Sectlon A-LocaC Lead The afffce arraf persorr resparasible for trackr`r+gr an d reportirrg ecorromrc afevelopfrrent outcomes and
periormance measures is;
Na►7te of afficelsectfara: -
Name of local lead: Tr`tle:
E-mait a riclress: Phorre -
Section 13-Return on [nvestment .
f_ Provrde a realistic estrmate af the tofal amvurrt o€ private sector capr`ta! #fte curr'en# andIor
prospectlve priva#e sectorpLar#rrer(s) ►v1!! rn vest in their new or exparrded facilWes an[{ opeiatlons
foflowirrg comple#rorr of the public ,sectorpro}ect_ Fxpfarn the basis far the estfmate.
$51_3 million
Thi s estin3ate is based on the plsdges ofsuppart from Torgerson Prapertios= pring Corporaiioti, and Un.iversity City Jnc,
Z IcYen#i€y th e existing businesses rn th e puhlic sectarprvject area and explain how the infrastructure
rrrvestrnerrt wiN ifrrprove the vrabrlrty a€ #hese buslrresses and any futur'e businesses tha t migh# be
attracted to the area. These outcames cornpfernent the comrrtrtted and prospectrve prrvate sectvr
bersiness developmen t projects #escrifie# fr+ Part and Part fV of ttre appficatlora.
'l"he Vallcy Corridor, like tlte Valley Couplet, is dominated by commercial and retail uses. Major property ou,ners iTi the area
include University C iLy and auto dcaler*,3. followbig table sliaws land use ui #ha Valley Corridar and in the Valiey Couplel,
C_1Document; attd Sc[tii5gs~CBsinbridgc_SPDY,AiTEVALLEYILoca1 5c[tingsl'I`cmporPry Intcrnet 12i1c;k0I.K4IVn!]ey Curridar Peojeci 2- JDF Applicaiibn
12-1-43 F!NA]..DOC
Valley Couplet ~ Valley Corridor
Number Number
of Tax Percent of of Tax Percent of
- Land Use Lots Acres Acres . Lots Acres Acres
Agriculture 0 0.0 0.0% 2 23.7 3.5%
Commercial 18 20.5 5.9% 27 52.9 7.9%
Manufacturing 2 1.8 0.5% 4 8.0 1.2°/a
Public 1 0.1 0.0% 2 5.6 0.8%
Residential 37 60.0 17.4% 191 159.4 23.7%
Retail 133 139.3 - 40.4% 221 266.7 39.6%
Service 54 35.3 10.2% 70 106.9 15.9°/n
Transportation 4 1.3 0.4% 0 1.0 0.1 %
Utilities 3 2.7 0.8% 2 0.6 0.1 %
VaCBnt 51 84.1 24.4% 58 36.1 5.4%
No Classificatior 2 0.0 0.0% 9 11.9 1.8%
Total 305 345.1 100.0% 586 672.8 100.0%
If the City •r~nes the area arowid the traffic i.mprovements as high-density resiclential, it would create cnare local rnarket
dernand for retail goods and services on the Val.ley CorridOr. Impraved eonneccioils beriveen Appleway and Sprague wil]
result u1 less out of du•ection ti-avel for some destinatians in thc. Corridor acid improve local access to parcels in the Corridor.
3. What other economic benefits will result from the project?
The. privaec scctar partners have estimated tliat they will invest $50 millian in devrelaping new buildines or renovating
cxisting buildirigs if the City makes the traffic ~nprovements includcd in chis project `lhose developinents will result in
short-term conscruction jobs as described on the Job Outcome Form.
Ttie revitalization of the Valley Carcidor will create positive idenfitv to the community of Spokane VaUey.
4. Use the following charts to estimate /ocal and sfatc tax revenue that will result from the private
sector project. The local tax rate is defined as that rate which is imposed by the local government
and generates revenue to the local government, if authority is not imposed, enter "not applicable."
For sales tax revenue, provide an estimafe even if the private sector participant qualifies for a sales
tax deferral. Estimate the annual state revenue from the private sector for the first year of business
for retail sales tax, property tax, and business and occupation tax. ff the project involves co-
applicants and the public project will be constructed in more than one jurisdiction, please complete
these forms for the private sector project outcomes in each jurisdiction.
ESTlMATED LOCAL REVENUE FROM THE PRlVATE SECTOR PROJECT:
$ X .021 = S .
Annual taxable sales Local sales 8 use tau rate Local sales & use tax revenue
$ X 1.598 / 1,000 =
lncrease in assessed value . Local property tax rate Local property tax revenue
X - = S-
Annual gross income Loca/ 8 8 O tax rate Loca1 B& O tax revenue
X - = S-
~ Lease Loca/ leasehold tax rate Leasehold sa/es tax revenue
i.
- X
Water consumption Local water rate Local water revenue
C'1Uocumenta strd SettingslCBainbridoe.SPOKAPfEVALLEY1Local Setting,s1`Pcmporary Intemet Fi1esl01„l:4lVs11ey Coridar T'mject 2- JpF Applicadon
12-1-05 FIN ALDOC
- x - = s-
Sewer consumption Loca/ sewer rate Local sewer revenue ,
- X - = S- ,
Electric consumption Loca/ elecfric rate Local eleciric revenue
S= X
Utility revenue Local utility tax rate Local utility revenue
Other revenues from rents, /eases, fees, etc. Loca/ miscellaneous revenue
Esfimated total annual local revenue from the private sector project $
ESTIMATED STATE REVENUE FROM THE PRIVATE SECTOR PROJECT:
$ X - .065 = $
Annual taxable sales State sa/es 8 use tax rate State sales 8 use tax revenue
$ ' X 2.631511,000 = $
lncrease in assessed value . State property tax rate State property tax revenue S X = $ .
Gross receipts State B 8 O tax raie State B& O tax revenue
5- X
Lease State /easehold tax rafe State /easehold sales tax. reve»ue .
Estimated total annual loca/ revenue from the private sector $
project
~
C:1DocumenU and ScitingslCIIainbridae_SP02:A.NEVAI.LE1'1Local ScttingslTemPorury lntemet FileslOLK4lVallcy Corridor ftojcca 2- JI)F APPiicatitm
12-1-05 FINe1L,.DOC
~
JOB OUTCOME FORM FOR PROSPECTIVE PRIVATE SECTOR DEVELOPMENT PROJECT(S)
On the chart bclow, please:
• List fhe number of aLojected jobs by job type to be created by the prospective private sector development(s) fhat will occur following
completion of the public infrastructure project.
• Define jobs in terms of Full Time Equivalents (FTEs).
NOTE: Wage data should exclude fiinge benefits
Name of Prospectivc Development Project:
Job Description Estimated tofa! Estimated fota! Estimated total Projected hourly Projocted annual
number of new number of new number of new wages for new wages for new
jobs created jobs created jobs create jobs jobs
(in FTEs) (in FTEs) (in FTEs) Year ? Year 3 Year 5
Mana4ement/Administration I I I I I I
Technical/Professional I I I I I Office/Clerical I
Sa/es I I I
Skilled Crafis I I I ~
Oth6r I I I
Tofals I
Please id@ntify the number, by classification, of any of the above jobs that are seasonal in natur@.
Please identify basis for job @strmates and cife sources for current and projecfed wage rates.
What is the county annual average covered wage? $ NOTE: For county data, go to
httn:/lwanrj.workforceexplorer.comladminluqloadedPublications/5585 Pub 2004 AA.xls
• C:1Documcnts md Sctting,s\CBainbridgc.Sl'OKANGVALLGY11.uc:a1 Si:Uingsl"Pemporury Internel Files\pLKhlVFilley Corcidor I'roject 2- J10 Applicutioa 12-1-05 F INAI_DOC
JOB OUTCOME FORM FOR lMMED1ATE/DIRECT PRIVATE SECTOR BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT PROJECT(S)
Complete this chart for each private sector business thai has signed a contingency agrecment.
• List the number of current employees by job type.
• List the number of 2Lojected jobs by job typo to be retained and/or created by the firm as a result of the public infrastructure project.
• Define jobs in terms of Ful! Time Equivalents (FTEs). NOTE: Wage data should exclude fiinge benefifs. NOTE: *Retained iobs are defined
as iobs that would othenvise be lost to the state if the business were to cease oaerations or move from Washinqton.
I Name of Business: I I
Job Description Current Average Number of jobs Numb€r of jobs Number of jo6s Tota! jobs Hourly Annual wages
number annual retained* creafed (in FTEs) creafed (in FTEs) (in FTEs) wages for for new jobs
' (in FTEs) salary (in FTEs) Year 1 Year 3 Year 5 new jobs
Management/Administration I I Technical/Professional I I I
I OfiFice/Clerical I I I I ( ~
I Sales I I I ~ ~
Ski!!ed Crafts ~ ~ ~ I I I I
Other I I I I I I ~ ~ I
Totals I I I I I I I I ~
Please identify the number, by classification of any of the above jobs that are projected to be seasonal in nature.
Please list the doJlar value of benefits by job types that will be provided for the refained and created jobs listed in the previous chart.
Job DeSCription MedicaJ Denta/ Retirement Employee Other. Other. Other: Other. Other.
PJan Stock Opfion
Management/Administration I I I, ~ I I I
Technica!/Professional I I I ~ I I I I Office/Clerical I ~ I • ~ I
Sales ~ I I I ~
Skilled Crafts I ~ I I I I
Other I I I ~ I C:1Dc.1--:,1ts and SettingslCBainbridge.SPOKANEVALLEYILocal Settingsl'I'emp ,--,'~ntemet FileslOLK41VaUey Corridor Project 2- JDF Application 12-1-05 -~•~:...I~OC
5. If retained jobs wi!l be an outcome of the private sectorproject, please explain the circumsfances
rvith your business fhat meet the definitio» of retained jobs and provide documentation. NOTE:
Retained jobs are defined as jobs thai v✓ould oihFrwise be /ost to the state if the business were fo
cease operations or move from Washington.
6. Explain the assumptions upon which the job projections are based and why the projeciions are
realistic.
.
C:1Documents and SeriingslCBainbridge.SPOKANEVALLEY1Local Settingsl7emporary Internst Fites10LK41Valley Corridor
ProjeU 2- JDF Application 12-1-05 FINAL.DOC
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
. %Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: March 28, 2006 City Manager Sign-off:
Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent 23 old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
. ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Barker Road Improvements, Spokane County Utilities Memorandum of
Understanding
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: •
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: 1) Approval of Six Year Transportation Improvement
Plan, which includes the Barlcer Road project, 2) Authorized City Manager to execute a Fuel Tax
Grant Distribution Agreement with TIB for the Barker Road Project, 3) Authorized City Manager -
to execute a contract with CH2MHILL for design services 4) Draft MOU presznted to Council on
March 21, 2006. -
BACKGROUND: In accordance with the Council-approved 2005 TIP, staff has been working
toward construction of the Barker Road Improvement Project, Boone Ave. to Spokane River.
This project is funded by the Transportation Improvement Board (TIB), Spokane Transit
authority (STA), developer funds and City funds. This project was designed by CH2MHILL. The
, bid opening for construction services was on March 10, 2006.
This area is on Spokane County Utilities° schedule to be sewered in 2010 as part of the South
Greenacres Sewer Project. To avoid cutting into the new road for future sewer construc#ion and
to consolidate work for better bid pricss the County has provided plans and specifications for
"dry line° sewer construction. The sewer improvement work was included in the Barker Road
' contract documents. Bid items for sewer improvements have been kept separate from the road
improvement items.
A memo of understanding (MOU) between the City and County is required to establish the roles
and cost obligations of each jurisdiction. An MOU has been prepared by the County for review
and approval. This MOU r2filects the final bid amounts and contract award.
OPTIONS: 1) Authorize the City Manager to execute the Memo of Understanding
2) Provide additional direction to staff
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Authorize the City Manager or City Manager's
Designee to sign the Memorandum of Understanding with the County.
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Eller Corporation is the apparent low bidder for the project
with a total bid of $1,673,984.78. The bid for the County sewer improvements is $266,265.70.
The bid for roadway improvement work is $1,428,578.60.
STAFF CONTACT: Neil Kersten, Public Works Director/Steve Woriey, Senior Engineer
ATTACHMENTS Memorandum of Understanding
tiIEnloRaNDuM OF unsDE12STAvllnNc
BETWEEN THF, CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY ANU SPQKAi1TF COUNTY
FOR T'1ff~ RIDUlNG & CONSTRUCTION OF THE
SOUTH GREEiN ACRES SANI I"ARY SE VVER PRQJECT, PHASE 2
Ii t CUn`JUT`CTION WTTH THE BAItKFR ROAD II17=PROVEMENT PROJLCT
WIiEREAS, a.s a part of its 2046 Transportation Trnprovement Program, the CTTY OF SPOKANE VALT EY (the C11"Y) intends to eonstruct the Barker Road Improvement Project (t:he ROAD PROJEC7).
The work iiicludes the full-width removal and reconscruction of Barker Road, belyveen Boone Avenue alid
River Way; and
1WiIE1ZEAS, as a part of the 2010 Annual Sewer Construclion Program, Spakane Cnunty (the
COUNTY) intends to construct a project Irnowm as the South Grecnacres Sewer Project, and a segment of
that sewer project, hereinaftzr referred to as the SE«tFR PROJrCT, is locafEd within the iimits of the
ROAD PROJECT; and Iv1'HT'IZEAS, the CITY and the COUNTY ap-ce that the installation of the SEWER PROJECT in
conjunction with the RQEiI7 PROJECT would benefit the ratepayers, tfl.ipayers and the traveling public;
NOW, TPFRE.H"ORE, the C.iTY and the COLI\~'I'Y do hereby agrce as follows:
NR'TICT T 1- RTSPONS.T.BILY'CTFS (7F TWT C1TS'
1. Plans and specifications f4r the ROAD PR.OJECT hav-e been prepared by the CITY, and the C1TY
intends to cnnstruct the ROA17 PR.OJECT in 2006. The COUNTY has•prepared plans for the SEWER .
PROJECT, togetherwith tech.nical speeifications and an associateci schedule of'bid items. "fhe CiT`Y has
included those plans, techriical specificatinns, and the associaced bid schedule in the bid documents for the RC7AD PROJECT. The CITY 'opencd bids for the ROAD PROJECT and the SE1VT-.'R PROJTCT on
March 10, 2006. The low bidder for the ROA.Ta !'ROJTCI' 6as been determined by the GITY to be Eller
. Corporation. The COLJ"NITY has reviewecl the tabulation of the bids, and has elected to accept the bid for
the SGWER PROJECT submitted by Eller Corporation in the amount of $266,265J0.
2. `I'he Cl'1`Y, upon awarding a contract for the ROAD PR.OJL`CT and the SEWER PROJFC'f, shall
have full control over the resultlnt constniction contract and shal) be the administrator for the combined
prnject.
3. Thc CITY sllali be responsible for a11 aspects of the design; eonstructien, and construction
management relative to the ROAll PROJECT, includinc, but not limited t:q removal and replaeement of
asphalt antl sttbgrade within the Barker Road construction limits. The C1TY will be responsible f'or
compaction testing of the. subgrade and asphalt replacement within khe botmdaries of the ItOAD
PROJ ECT.
4. `I'he CITY shall make payments to the contractor in accordance with the contract terms, in order thal
work will proceed accarding to schedule.
A.EtTTCLE 2- RESPONSl]31LTT[ES OF THL COUNTY
1. The plans and speeifications for the construccion of the ST'WE17 PROJLCT have been prepared by the
COIJNTY. 'I"he COUNTY will caordinate with the CITY and take reasonable measures to ensure t.hat the
SE1'VER. PROJECT plans are- compatible with the scope of work contemplated under the ROAD
- PlZOJEC'I.
Memoranclum of Undersc.siding„ SOUTH GRL`FN ACRES SANITARY SENER PROJECT, PI-61SF 2 Yagc I of 2
2. The COU'TY shall designate a"responsible person" who s}~all represent the COl1NTY's interest
, . during the construction of the SrNVFR PKOJECT, and shall coordinate any modifica2ions or changes
needed by the COUNTY in conjunction with the work.
3. "I'he COUNTY shall be responsible for the inspection and testing of all work and mitterials which are
solely related to the construction of the SEWER PRQJECT, including compaction testine antl sails testinc,
within the sewer trench area below t11c final subgrade elevation of the reconstructed Barker Road. The
COUN"I°Y shall nrovide a represent3tive to pert'orm inspection duties relative to the consb•uctipn of the
SEWER PROJECT, as discussed above. The COUNTY's representative shall provide tabulat.ions of pay
quantities to the CITY upon 48 hours notice to facilitate the prepv-ation of pay estimates by the CITY.
4. Any modifcations or changes to the SEWLR PROJTCT shall be conrdinated by the COUNTY and
shall be coordinated with and approvcd by the CiTY prior to implementation.
AItTICLrt 3 - AJ,LOCA'I'ION OF COSTS
1. This Memorandum of Understanding, once fully elecuced; shall e.stablish a commimlent by the
COlJtNTY io reimburse the C1TY for those construction costs associated with the SF.NArER !'R(7JrCT.
tVl additional costs assoeiated widi changc orcicrs and/or valid claims f'or the SEG1ER F'RQJ-ECT shall be
the responsibility of the COi.JNTY.
2. The CITY shall prepare monthly pay estimates for the SERER PROJEC"I' based upnn the tabulations
of pay yuantities provided by the CUIrjTY. The COUN1"Y shall promptly review each pay estimate
prior to presentation by the CITY io the contractor.
3. Upon the siping of each pay estimate by the CITY and the contractor, the CITY shall send att invoice
to the COUNTY Cor those amounts to be paid to the contractor by the CITI' for work on the SENETZ
PROJEC'1'. The CIT'Y shall include copies oF the signed pay estimates as attschtnents to the monthly
invoices to the COUN7`Y. The County shall pay the City, wiiliin 20 days of the receipt of the invoice, for
all construction costs due to the contract:or in association with the SENVEIt f'ftOJT'CT.
4. Tlie COUNTY shall obtain a permit from the CITY to perforrn wnrk within the CITY'S right-of-way
for die SENVETi 1'KOJECT. The Cl i Y is authorized t:o charge its reasonable aclministrative cosis incurract
for pre_paring pay estimat:es, change orders, et:c., for the SEWL.R PR.OJ6CT to the pe.rmil.
CITY QF SPOKAi\TR VAI T,,F..~.':
By: T)ace:
Davici Niereier, City Manager
tU'1'ROVrD AS TO FOlt.M:
By: Date:
Office of the City Attorney
SPOKAINE, COUT'TY:
B}°: Date:
N. 13ruce Rawls
Spol:ane Countv Director of Utilities
Memorsndum of Underslanding, SOLITH GREEN ACRES SANITARY SE«'Elt F'ROJECT, PH_ASF 2 Page 2 of 2
- CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: March 28, 2006 City Manager Sign-off:
Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ~ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending 12gisla6on -
AGENDA ITEM.TITLE: Construction Engineering Supplement to Consultant Services
Agreement with CH2M HILL for Barker Road Project
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: Ordinance No. 22 - Establishing the Procurement Procedure.for
Architectural and Engineering Services.
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: 1) Approval of Six Year Transportation Improvement
Plan, which includes the Barker Road project, 2) Authorized City Manager to execute a Fuel Tax
Grant Distribution Agreement with TIB for the Barker Road Project, 3) Authorized City Manager
to execute a contract with CH2MHILL for design services
BACKGROUND: In accordance with the Council-approved 2005 TIP, staff has been working
toward construction of the Barker Road Improvement Project, Boone Ave. to Spokane River.
This project is funded by the Transportation Improvement Board (TIB), Spokane Transit
authority (STA), developer funds and City funds. This project was designed by CH2MHILL. The
bid opening for construction services was on March 10, 2006.
The Engineer's Estimate is $1,842,595.75 for roadway and County sanitary sewer construction
($1,666,556.00 roadway and $191,003.12 County sewer). The lowest responsive bidder, Eller
Corporation, submifted a bid of $1,673,984.78. The bid for roadway improvement work is
$1,428,578.60. The bid for County sewer work is $266,265.70. The County sewer work will be
completed under the same construction contract with County and City obligations laid out in the
Memo of Understanding presented to Council on Niarch 21. Spokane County will reimburse the.
City for all costs associated with the construction of the sanitary sewer system
CH2M HILL is currently under contract with the City for $321,894.55. This contract covers
design services, topographic and right of way surveying, geotechnical investigation and property
acquis'rtion. Total billed to date is $220,872.03.
Construction management and inspection services will be required during the construction
phase of this project. It is our intent to use CH2M HILL for #hese additional services. This option
to expand the scope of services was docurnented in the Request for Qualifications for
- Engineering Services. CH2M HILL has furnished a preliminary budget of $167,078 for this work
(approximately 10% of the engineer's construction estimate). Staff will review and negotiate a
supplement to the contract. The scope of work will include construction management,
construction engineering, inspection services and materials testing. .
OPTIONS: 1) approve the recommended action, or 2) provide additional direction.
~
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Authorize fhe City Manager or Ci4y Managers
Designee, to execute the Consultant Supplemental Agreement with CH2M Hill for the Barker •
Road Project, in an amount not to exceed $167,078.
BUDGETIFINANCIAL IMPACTS: The total budget for this project is $2,258,000, not including
the County's sanitary sewer work. The source of funds for this project include: STA, $117,000;
TIB, $1,806,000; Developer, $24,000; WSDOT, $10,000; City, $301,000. The construction
phase of the project budget is summarized below:
Construction phase summary:
Construction contract $1,428,579
Construction engineering $167,078
Signal Equipment $150,000
Staff time $10,000
Contingency (5%) $87,780
Total $1,843,437
There are adequate appropriations in the 2006 budget to cover these construction engineering
costs.'
STAFF CONTACT: Steve VVorley, Senior Engineer (CIP); Neil Kersten, Public Works Director
ATTACHMENTS TIB Consultant Supplemental Agreement, draft scope of work and budget. .
~ Transportat(on Improvement Board
Consultant Suppiemental Agreement
_
Ageru,y C'rty Of SpOkene Vslley ProJect Number $-3-208(001 )-1 _
Proea Name Barker Road - Boone Avenue ta Spokane Rivef Wnsuiting Firm CH2M HILL, IrtC.
supPr,m«,c Pnase Construction Management and Inspection Services
supplemarn Nmbar 03
The Loca1 Aqertcy of City of Spokane ValleK desiras to supplement the agreement entared into w9th
CH2M HILL. Inc and executed an November 19. 2004. All provisions in the bas+c agnaement remain
in effect except as expressty modified by this supplemenL
The changes to the agreement sre describEd as follows:
Section II, SCOPE OF WORK, fs hereby amended as fo!lows:
CFt2h1 HILL will provide construction management and inspectEon services as described in Exhibit 62.
Section N, TIME FOR BEGlNN1NG AND GOMPLETtt?N, ig amentled to changa ihe Compfetion Date
~
~ SUPPLEMENTAL GOMPLETION DATE Ocfober 3d, 2006
Section V, PAYMENT, shall be amended as follows asset forth in Exhbit A -
MAXIMUM AMOUNT PAYABLE $489,008.47
~ EXHiBR a
Original A,greement ~ Supplement ~ Tota)
Oirect Salary Cvst $57,173.08 W,232.36 $102,405.42
Overhead I $98,394.85 ~ $71,973,73 $170,368.58
finclusilnp Povrctt A.dQ',Was)
Dired Non-salary Costs $122,945.35 $20,649.10 $143,594.45
I Fixed Fee I $18,66$.15 I $14,064.73 I $32,732.88
I Cvnfingency I $24,713.14 I $15,192.00 I $39,905.14
Total I $321,894.55 i $167.111.32 $489,046.47
lf you concur wi#h this supptement and agree to the chaRges as slsted above, please sign and date in the
appropriate spaces below. .
AgBnCy Signabure l?a!e
Cansultant 5grrature Data
CL'!"l&IATMTSlPP'LEI.'1FNTALAfifiEBMNT01oGC • PAGE t oFt
City of Spokane Valley Barker Road lmprovements
Construction Managernent and Inspectian Services
Labor Hour Summary
~ ~ ~ ) ~ ~
~ CH261 HILL 1 ~ 8 ~ 10 ~ 11 ~ 1S ~ 18 ~ 7ota1
Tas1c Taslc Descrlptton Project Resldenl Civil Raadway Daslgn/CAD Ptqect Admin. Ass9st.
Manager - Observer - Engineer - Pat Tech. - Ctarlt AccountaM - JassEca
Jlm DlngRetd (hr9s Krych Casby OametCBates Titchenal -
Chrtatensen
I PM02 RO EP04 TC27 PA03 AA02
Revv Rates $45.40 $31.39 . $36.89 $28.93 $19.79 1 $18.04
PM ~Prolect Management ~ 112 16 ~ 40
RO I Rostdent ObservpHon 720 I 40 I I•
I
OE I OfflceEngJnasrtng Servicas ~ 192 I I 84 I 4 I i 46
PC IProlectCloseoutServices ~ 8 I I 24 I 32 I 24
i
TOTALS I 312 1 720 1 144 1 36 1 16 1 1112
1340
City of Spokane Valley Exhlbit D-2
Barker Road Improvement- CMllnspection . CH2M HILL
Employee or Catepry Hrs. x Rsis ~ Caat
1 Projed Manager- Jim Dingfleld 312 $ 45.40 S14,164.8D
2 Sentor Geo`ech. Enpr - Ken Graen 0 $ 4828 $0.01)
3 Ernironmentel PM - Marlens Guhlke , 0 V 56.13 $O.OD
4 8enior Geatech. Engr - Karen Dawson 0 $ 37;87 $0.00
5 Senior Strud. Engr- Pau1 GueMher 0 a 49.53 $0.40
6 Resldent Observsr - Chris Ghtistensen 720 $ 31.39 S22,600.84
T Geotechical Enginesr- Bob Mart3n 0 $ 34.98 $0.40
8 Hydr. Engineer- Mar1c Anderson 0 $ 30.53 $0.00
9 Sbvct Ergr - Adam 8ergman 0 S 25,23 $0.00
10 Civii Roadway Engineer - Pat Krych 144 $ 36.89 $5,312.18
11 DosigNCAD Tech. - Clarlc'Cosby 36 $ 28.93 $1,041.48
12 Prajsct Accountant - Gamett BateS 16 $ 18.78 $316.64
13 Admin. Asgist. - Jessica Trtchenal 112 S '56.04 . $1,786.48
Total Ftr3. 1340 $45,232.38
Dtrect Salary Cost . i45,232•36
Dlrect Salary Eeca1at9on Cost (aslimated)
2005 to 200_ - 0% $0.00
Totel dlrect Salary Cost $45,232.36
Overhead Cost 0 159.12% of D"rrect Labcr $71,973.73
Fxed Fee @ 12.095 of Direct Labor + Overheati s4084,73
~ Totai Overtmad 8 Fized Fee Cos1 $86,038.46
'Tot81 DIreCi Salary Cost 4151,270.62
Dlrecl Expenaes
Reproduction Cost No. Each Cast
Reports 2,040 $0.04 $80.00
Misc. Cop9es 100 $0.04 $4.00
Reprogrephtcs 0 $10 $0.00 '
AAaiUQellVeriesletc. 1 $15 $15.00
MIIeaBe 5,860 Mi. @ $0.445 /Mile $2,607.70
Auto RerrtaUGasoline days @ $85 lday $0.00 .
Lodgirrg days @ $75 /day $0.00
Aertal Photographs 1 $20 $20.00
. Trevel Toial (airfare, train, etc) 2 $350 $700.00
Equipment ReMais, EDM, GPS 0 $425 $0.00
Parking $0.00
ParDlsm days ~ $150 lday $0.00 •
Commuuricatian 1,340 $0.00 $0.00
Compvters 1,340 $0.00 $0.00
Heeb & Safety 0 $0.00 30.00
Misc EVenses 1 $200.00 • . $3,626.70
SubCOntreds
Budinger (Fisld & Lab) $17,022,40
$17,az2.ao
. subcatai s20.60.10
; Subtotal $151,920
Contingency (140/6) . $15,192
Total ;1$7,112
Budget Estimate
ProJect Management 168 $17,538 $0 5243 $17,780
Resitlent Obssrvation 780 $69,873 $17,422 $2,225 $89,121
Offlce Engineering Servlces 324 $36,432 $0 $1,159 $37,592 .
Project Closeout Servlces 88 $7,427 $0 $0 $7,427
Subtotal 1340 $131,271 $17,022 S3,627 ;151,924
Contingency {M} $16,192
Total 5167,142
EWertse Breakdown
- Budinger (Feld & Lsb) $ 17,022
CH2M expEnses $ 3,827
Total $ 20,649
'
l GXHIBIT 132
Scope of Work for
Construction Management.and Inspection Services
forthe Barker Road Improvements Project-
Boone Avenue to Spokane River
City of Spokane Valley, Washington TIB Project No. 8-3-208(001)-1
1.0 Introduction
. The purpose of this Scope of Work is to establish the specific scope of construction management
and inspeclion services to be performed by CH2Vf T-TTT L during the construction phasc of the
Barkcr lload Iinprovemcltts project. The project, to be constructed by an independent conh•actor
selected by the City af Spokane Valley (Spokane Valley), Extends from Boone rlvenue ta the
Spokane ~'.iver. The projecl• ti*ill reconstTUCt ihe existi.ng hvo-lane rural roadway into a three-lai1e
urban street wlur-h will include sidewallcs, Uike lanes, curb and gutters, draulape collection and
infiltration systems. Traffic signals and illumination Nvill be installed at the Missien Avenue
inlersection.
The project also ulclucles construction af a sanituy sewer system for Spokanc Couitty, under a
sepa.rate Uid scheclule fronl the roadway work. Qther puUlicly-owned and privately-owned
utilities will be installed, relocated, or adjusted by the respective utility owners during tlus praject.
Spol<ane Valley may mA-e or approve ehanges widhin Lhe general scopc o[ tl-Lis agi-eemenl. If such
changes affect CI-i2M HIT T.'s cost of or timc reqLured for performance of the services, an equihable
acljustment will be made tllrough an autendment to this agreement. CH2M I-ITi_L will iZOtify
Spokane Wa.lley in writiitg of the occurrence of a c.liange ancl an esl-imale of dtie cost impact.
Spokane Valley will provide 'written approval of change. t110 percent contingency fund has been
established far mi.nor dimlges tU thc Scope of Work. Use of die cnntingency fu.nd requires writtEn
authorizalion fram Spokane ValJey.
2.0 AssumpHons
Construction is anticipated t•o begin in April 2006 and to be completed 'u1 Qctober 2006.
CH2VI F-IILL's services and level of effort arc Uaseci upon thc schedule or duration of constructiotl
anticipated at the tinle that these services are agreEd upon. Deviations from the anticipatea
' schedule or duration of cnnstr-uction ivill materially affcct d-ie scope of these serviees and CH2M
Supplemental Agreernent 03.doc Page 1 af 7
HTL,L's compensation fer the senTices, and will require an adjustment to CH2M HILL's :
compensation. "
CH2vI 1-iILL will serve as the renter of conlmtuucation benaleen Spokane Val]ey and 5pokane
Val]ey's Contractor. It is ullended that Spoklne Valle}' staff will providc direction to
CI-I2_1%4 HILL for decisions related to extra wQrk and major changes to the project - however, a
signature of an authorized nlembcr nf Spokane VallEy staff rvill be required to bind SpUkane
Valley to a change arder. Commun.ications betiveen Spokane Valley and the Contractor without
Ci-T2M HILL will be avoided to maximi•r.e CH2M HIL.L's effectiveness.
Spokane Vallcy will contrach sEparately with Spokanc County for additional inspection services
relati.ng to the signal and illununation systems.
Spoka.ne County w-ill provide uispFCtion services for the sanitary sewer construction activities
including inspechion of backfill and coinpactian testing up to the raadway subgrade. CHal HILL
will coordinate with Spokane County to obt3in quantities, change order approvals, and other
information from Spokane Cnunty as necessary to process monthly progress payments for the
sanihry scwer wqrk.
Utility work perforined Uy publicly-otiTned mZd privately-ownea utility agencies will not be
inspected by CI-I2'N4 HTLL. CH2M I-III..L will work ivith the Contractor to ensure that utility work
to be performcd by others is coordinated appropriately.
CI-I2M HILL Nvill perform only a cursary review ofTraffic Control Plans submitted by the .
Contractor. Spokane Valley will provide formal review and reject or approve Traffic Control Plans. ,
CH2M H1LL will not be respdnsible for the means, mekhods, tecluuques, seyuences, procedures, or
health and safety precautions of the Contractor, nor shall CH2NI H1LL be responsible for 111e
ConLractor's Eailure to perform i.n acC4rdlnce with the Contraet documEnts. '
Qualily assurance/quality control fielcl and laUoriitory testinp services will be provided by
CHZM HTI..1..'s authorized subCOnsultant(s).
Any labor and expense.ti required to add.ress Construction claims, unloreseen subsurface
consicierations, or additional construction requested Uy the Contractor or Ozvncr may reyuire
additional levcl of effort beyond the established budget.
Any clainls resdlukion or litigation assistance requested of CH21v1 HILL will constitute adclitional
services Yltat are not i.ncluded in tlus Scope of Work.
`C'he presence or duhies of CII21v'I HIT.:I.'s personrlel at a constructian site, w]»ther as onsite
representatives or otherwise, do not ma.ke CH2M HILL's persorulel u1 any way responsible for
those duties thatbelong to Spokane Valley and/or the Contractar or other entities, and do not
relieve the Contractor or any other r•ntity of Y11eir obligations, duties, and respansibilities,
including, but not limited, to all construction methods, means techniques, sequences, and
procedures necessary for coordinati.ng anci coinpleting all portions of the construckiori work ut
accordance with the conshxuction Contract laocuments and any health or safety precautions
required by such construction work. _
~
Supplemenhal Agreement 0.3.cloc Page 2 of 7
CH21\4 H1LL's personnel have no authority to exercise any control over any Contractor Qr other
entity or their entployees in connechion wihh theit work or any health or safely precautions and
1-uive no dut}, for inspeching, noting, observing, correcting, or reporting on healttl or safety
deficiencies of the Contractor(s) or other entity or any odler persons at tt1e site except
CH2IN1 HILL's own persorulel.
'1 he presence of CH2A\4 H1LL's personnel at a construction site is for the purpose of providing t4
Spokane Valley a greater degree of conEidence thaY the coinpleted construclion ivork will conform
generally to tlle construchion docunlents and that the ultegrity of the design concept as reflected in
the Construction Docunlents has been inlpleulented and preserved by the Contractor(s).
CH2M HILL neither guarantees d1e performajlce of the Contractor(s), nAr assumes respansibiliky
for Contractar's failu.re to perform work in accordance rvith the Canstructian Docuntents.
3.0 Scope of. Sexvaces
CI-I2M HIIrT.. will provide the followi,ng services: Proicct Management
PNiJ Oversee CI-12M 1T1T I.'s services far the project.
PM:2 Supervise the Resident Observer defined herein.
FM.3 Supervise review of submittals.
P\4.4 Provide periodic site visits duri.ng constcuctian. Typically thesc visits will occur on
the day of the schecluled constructian coordination mecting.
PV1.5 Oversee cunsl•ruclion Ch1nge Order process.
PVt.6 RevieNv a.nci approve Contractor progress pa}rnlents.
PM.7 Reviezv, approve and issue CH2Nt HIT T i.nvoices.
Pv1.8 Document comuluiucations associated witih the Project
PV4.9 CdUrdinate Prnject Closeout Activitiss
Resicient Observation "
R0.1 Meet and/or consult -vvith Coniracl•or's represenl~atives and Spokanc- Valley to assist
in implenlentulg the cpnsty-uction process. CH21N4 I-iILL's Resident OUserver will
meet.tirith Contractor's representative (superintendenh) daily or every other day as
needed during acLive Conskruckion.
R0.2 Spot check d1e layout and final position of the work.
Supplemental Agreement 03.doc Page 3 of 7
•
I70.3 Provide oUservation of construction activities ta help assure conformance to the
requirements of the contract documents. If non-condormina work is found, -
CH2M H1LL rvill notify the Contractor tliat the work nceds to be carrected.
However, CII2vI H1LL will not have the authority to stop work and will not direct
the Coniractor as to mcans and nlcthods of construction, in accordance with the
Contract Documents.
R0.4 Attend cnnstruction coorciination meetil-igs. Tllesc meeti.ngs will generally be
planr►ed for each iveEk of active construction and will be sclledulr• d on the same day
and time each week.
It0.5 Recommend the amounts of payments due the Contractor as set fqrth in the
ConstructiAn Contract.
R0.6 Coordinate materials teshing ackiviLies. Arrange and schedule quality
assurancE/qualily cantxol field a.nd laboratory testing services. Ceordinate the
wark of an inspechion service for the observation and tests o[ niaterials used in the
constx-i.iction; receive and evaluate repprts by such service. Refer to Table 1 for the
Quality AssuranCe/Qtzality Control tests and level of Effort assunled for the Project.
Actual testing requirentents may vary based on Contractor perfornlancc but
cninimum tzsting requirements will Ue met. Costs af testing scrvices will bC per test
or per hour of testing technicia.n at the actual rates charged by CI-T21vi H17LL's
subconsultant. CH2M I-ULL's services shall not include an independent verification
of thE quality of work conducked and inforination provided by testing laboratories
or ather independent contractors retainEd by CH2'1M I TiLL in caiutection with :
0-12M I-iILT 's services provideci to Spokanc Valley.
RO.7 Assist Spokane Valley is responcling to concerns of the general public.
RO.$ Inspect Contractor and Spcakane Valle}' supplicd materia]s for conformance -,vith the
CQntract Documents.
R0.9 Identify and kabulatE installed quantities idenkified 'u1 the bid sdlcdule.
RO.10 Identi.fy u1d tabulate materials-on-hand for payment to the Contr-actor.
R0.7.I Accept materials delivery tickets.
R0.12 KECp a daily construction diary and providc a daily construction report.
R0.13 Review Contractor's Traffic Control activities and cAmpare to approved Traffic
Control l'lan a_nd notify Project Ma.nager of eompliance status.
Office Eneineering SeXVices
OE.1 Schedule, prepare a.n agenda for, conduct and prepare a reeord of the pre-
cansl•ruction conference to Uc helcl in Spokane Val.lcy's offices.
Supplemental A&recment 03.cloc Pa&e 4 of 7
. 0E.2 Meel and/or consult with representatives of Spokaule Valley and appropriate
regulatory agencies when requesbEd and as necessary for consultation or
conferences in regard to construction of the I'roject.
OE.3 Provide up to 7 copies of approved full-sized Drawings, Specifications, anci
Contrach 17ocuinents to the Contractar. Providing additional copies will be
considered an additional service beyond the estiblished budgek
0E.4 Provide lechnical interpretations of the Urawings, Specifications, and Contract
Documents, and evaluatc requcsted deviations froin the approved design or
specifications.
- 0E.5 Participate in Weekly Construction 1'rogress Nleetxngs
0E.5.1 Ct T2M WiT Lwill schedule, attend and conduct one constr•uclion
caordination meeting each week during active cdnstruchion (or bi-monkhly
if appropriate). t1 standard agenda wi_ll bc set and used to prepare far the
work u1 the period aheac3; to discuss the work coulpleted in the last period;
and to discuss other issues of importance to Spoka»e Valley, CH2iv1 H'1'LL,
Cantractor, a.nd other parties as appropriate. 0E.5.2 CI-i2M H1LL will prepare mulutes from each construction coordinatian
meetiilg and will route them to al.l attendces -weel:ly. CH2v1 IIILL will
prepare and submit the weckly statement of working t3ays for the contract
~ along with thc nlEeting mulutes.
OL.G CI-12M TIILL's Projcct Manager, or ouler designated CI-12M 1-ffLL staff as deemed
appropriate by the T'roject UIanager, will make periodic visits wid1 the Resident
Observer to the site of the 1'roject to observe tl1e progress a-nd quality of the wrork
w 1d to determine i.E the work is proceed'u1g in accordance with the ultent of the
Contract T)acuments. "171-tese visits Nvill typically ocrur on the same day as the
construction progress meeting. If non-conforming work is fou.nd, CI-i21\1 I-IILL rvill
notify t11e Contractor that the Nvork needs to bE correcled. However, C142Ivi HiLL
will not llave the authority to stop work 1nd will not direct the Contract4r as to
means and metttods of construction,, in accordance wiU1 the Contract Documenls.
OB.7 Subnuttals and 1Viaterials Coorclinatian
OL.7.1 During construction, CH2Ivi HIT i., will review and reject or approve shop
tlrawings, diagrams, illusl•rations, catalog data, schedtiles and samples, the
results of tests and inspeclions, a.i1d Qther data which lhe Contractor is
required tn subnut. These shall be reviewed for conformance with the
infomlation given u1 the Contract T)ocuments. Such review is not
intended as approval of the suUmithals if they cleviatc from d1e Contract
Docuinent's or conYai.n errors, omissions, and inconsistencies, nor is it
intended tn relieve the Contractor oE his full responsibility for Contrach
perfArmance, nor is the reviewintended to ensu_re or guarailtee lack af
% inconsisteneics,error, and/or otnissions behveen tile submittals and the
; •
Supplemental Ageeement 03.doe Pege 5 of 7
Contract requirements. TrafEic control plan. submittals will Ue reviewed and rejected or approved by Spokane Vallcy, as noted 'ui the rlssumptions seciaon of tt1i,s Scopc of Work.
0E.7.2 CI I2M HI'LL will keep a log to track the status and disposition of each
submitW.
• 0E.7.3 CH2M H1LL, w-ill report the results of the testing to Spokane Vailey and .
Contractor, as necessary.
Or.8 Assist Spokane Valley i.n negotiat7rtg with the Contrachor the scope and cost of up to
thrcc (3) co»iract changc orders. Prep~v- and proCess such change orders as nlay bc
requi.red and subnlit to Spokane Valley for approval.
OE.9 Centractor's Progress Payments (Pay Estimates).
OE.9.1. Progress payment requests shall be i.n.itiated by the Contr•actor.
0E.9.2 CT 12M H1LL's Project Nlanager or othcr designat-eci staff will wark with
' the Resident OUserver, and with the Contractnr to reach an agreement on
items to be recommended for payment. CH2M 1-11LL %vil] prepare a
spreadsheet to summarize the quantities due for paymcnt from
worl:sheets submitteci by the field Engineer and the Contractor.
0E.9.3 CI T2'M 1-iILL will review a.nd approve each progress paynlent appl.ication , .
aftcr complete revriew and concurrence from the Resident Observer. _
C112M I-ITT T will subnut the complebed package to Spokane Valley for
approval and payment. Spokanc Valley will prepare all funding source
rei.inUursement forms and requests.
OE.10 Make a final review of tlte constiuction to det•ernune if the wqrk has Ueen complebed
in general conformance widh tlie Contract Docuinents. Fcview final pa}tment for
constructian. Prepare 1nd submit a letter recommendi_ng acceptance of the work
. when it appears 1hat lhe Contractor has met the ConkraCt requirements. Spokane
Valley and appropriate regLalatory or funding agencies may furnish a represenhativc
to joi.nkly make d1e final ahservation of the canstruction. Proiect Closeout Services
1'C.1 Assist Spokane Valle}' in closing out the praject. Assist.anCe witl1 auciits performed
by funding agencies or ether oukside sources is considered an additional service
requ.iring additional level of effort beyond the established budget.
I'C.1 CH2M HfLL will prepare one (1) reproducible set and eleckronic AutoCAD rceard
drawuigs and submit to Spokane Valley, upon compleYion of the work, using
available information supplied by the Contractor, the Resident Observer, supplicrs,
and othcr sources.
Supplemental Agreement 03.doc Page 6 uf 7
. Table 1
Assumed QrVQC Testing to Be Provided by Subconsulcant Estimatcd macerials testing services to be providcd by CH2M H:I_L's dcsignated
subconsultant are tabulaYed below:
Descrintinn Ousntitv Unit
I,arthworl:- SampliriQ & Testinp,
"i'echniciun 60 Hours
A4aximum llensity/Optimum Moisture (Proctor) 5 E-ach
Spec;iGe Gravity 2 Each
WSDO'f 606 2 Each
Sicve Analysis 5 Fach
Sand Equivalent 5 Each
Fractured Far,c 5 Each
Concrete - SimplinL, cF Testing
Technician 40 Hours
Compressive Strength Specimcns 30 Fach
Sieve tlnalysis 3 Each
~ l
~ f Aspl►alt Cuncrete PavinQ - Sampline S Testinv
'1'et;hnician 30 Hours
Te.zlinician O'f 4 Hour,
Pavemcnt Coring 6 Hours
VMA, VFA, Va (Nlolumetrics) 7 Each
'I'hcoretical maxirnum Dcnsity - Rice 7 Each
Oil ContenUGradation 7 Each
Fine Aggregate Angularity 4 Each
Flat R l:longated Picccs A Each '
Sand Lquivalcnt 4 Each
Fractured Face 4 Each
- Othcr ltems
F'roject A4enagcment (-1 hour per wcck) 10 Hours
Nuclear Densorneter 30 days
Sample Pick-up (pona1 to portal) 15 Hours
\4aUili7atiOn/VEhielc \4ileage 1200 Miles
i '
' .
SupplPmental Agreernent 03.doc Page 7 of 7
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
. Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: March 28, 2006 City Manager Sign-off:
Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent (D old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Award of Barker Road Improvements Construction Contract GOVERNING LEGISLATION:
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: 1) Approval of Six Year Transportation Improvement
Plan, which includes the Barker Road project, 2) Authorized City Manager to execute a Fuel Tax
. G(ant Distribution Agreement with TIB for the Barker Road Project, 3) Authorized Cify Manager
to execute a contract with CH2MHILL for design services
BACKGROUND: In accordance with the Council-approved 2005 TIP, staff has been working
toward construction of the Barker Road Improvement Project, Boone Ave. to Spokane River.
This project is funded by the Transportation Improvement Board (TIB), Spokane Transit
. authority (STA), developer funds and City funds. This project was designed by CH2MHILL. The
..bid opening for construction services was on March 10, 2006.
The Engineer's Estimate is $1,842,595.75 for roadway and County sanitary sewer c4nstnaction
($1,666,556.00 roadway and $191,003_12 County sewer): The lowest responsive bidder, Eller
Corporation, submitted a bid of $1,673,984.78. The bid for roadway improvement work is
$1,428,578.60. The bid for County sewer work is $266,265.70. The County sewer worlc will be
completed under the same construction contract with County and City obligations laid out in the
Memo of Understanding presented to Council on March 21. Spokane County will reimburse the
' City for all costs associated with the construction of the sanitary sewer system.
OPTIONS: 1} Authorize the City Manager to execute a contract to the lativest responsive
. bidder
2) Provide additional direction to staff.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Motion to award the Construction contract for Barker
Road Improvements to Eller Construction in the amount of $1,673,984.78.
BUDGETlFINANCIAL IMPACTS: The total budget for this project is $2,258,000, not including
the County's sanitary sewer work. The source of funds for this project include: STA, $117,000;
TIB, $1,806,000; Developer, $24,000; WSDOT, $10,000; City, $301,000. The construction
phase of the project budget is summarized below:
Construction phase summary:
Construction contract $1,428,579
Construction engineering $167,078 Signal Equipment $150,000
Staff time $10,000 Contingency (5%) $87,780
Tota I $1,843,437
There are adequate appropriations in the 2006 budget to cover these construction costs. '
STAFF CONTACT: Neil Kersten, Public Works Director
Steve Woriey, Senior Engineer - Capital Projects
ATTACHMENTS: 1) Bid tabulation - Barker Road Improvements, Boone to Spokane River 2)
Award recommendation letter from CH21VIHILL
BIO TABULATMIN 40
BCHEDUIE A• BarRw RoW Mnprovwweb 8000s Avwwa lu Spoiane Rtw -UP
Prdeel No. 04-003 (TIB No 8-3-208(001 } I ~
SpEOULE 8- Sduth Onwnscrw SanRary Swww
P►oillict No. fDil. Phre 2
BID OPElAMfi DATE - MMCM 10.200i. 11 :00 A.M.
r[n I tto rrE* ~T totK
~I NO ►AT~[NI /1Ell ~ ~ O~►ttl• la~lhlef 1drlLc.t uwlPnb ~ lobiCoo~ !sr'-c< (aY_
C
~uieuai a.~~~ ~o atpeoreewrt I~... dimmomi. r w.` wwA sl M:T
u ~ •;i;aea fi ~~em n~cace~ u••wo +zwuua i;omeoc
~i' muu I.3 I7P-IIr~ {oM~GC a' 1•.!,:oacu _17cm VANn1.
' 17~'+ NIC I L ~ OG C~ tt UX 7U lG D10 1'rn ~c L M[qG.;C
• 71~ # .+Te~pY'1 IY~I.t j~j C 't4, 9 '1. i(' i lit 4*~ C<~ 4 t rr MA v _ i74.37 lIG!.M! UI
[r..T4:4 L11DO
a rn~~R~L 1~1 1 lY 75
'"~.~oo:c
~ .Lt. ~ l`~il:c~ ~ETE i~1' .'l.~ ~ i, 7:q T ~ oDO ➢0 i ~ ~''Ir_~K 11 M/ 1~ 1 7'1 au
t ~t~~- '•.-Ftitr:~--~i.MF`iGPYilh+i • it~coc L'~?4 11101 ii•~va st2~ono
.q. rl 3~ :1~. T.FF . t~ TYDG pA7.7 Ir gl 1_1 :MVl +37C.~ i'.' LT9 ;U
~ .-'JtI ,^iL~A~:':_Si-: ~t:IN 7 ~ L7:RJC . 1t•4:L_fi • u:~n___:v
t la t •-»'iivikL crti:aa:l~41' c:.tlRi[ t Ca t~7~ n:_tr _ fn i•r ':c u~
1,~
12 ! 1?'~•^Vii'~.''O7. Fk'U~O C ~~etl,':iU ql~ U•i[:'c / S:l~~aY
1S I 'C~if'~ Y l:C,}o760
14 i t:w F•~. ~~c 7r t r: oq ; in.`r=i
riw 1 s•'t :-7L'! IN¢ t':r ~''r;~: _ ►u~ Fct ~
t7. ~1~-:!✓il[4i~~'F~1 1 1 100{RiC.tOll 11 1_=r,n:~~' t_S.~Q L'•!:Lf~'.Ot~
, p ~t~ 1'^_: I. ',>r 93 I10~ L'JMC L9 1l ~ M1~ t0 vi :v,~
ts M06 ' 0 '3m Is i: :a CCa _ OQ iR :ar,2i-
b ~ ~i _ IF. • f71 lpm t.1. .a2. iGb/f R;-
.0~ u~ ~z ?PtI ~CT C~~ 1 p~ i.m. T, 9A x
l Ol • i--~.P: r~ -:TT +'i..DE6 NM CLM I A t6~ 4 f~C X . i~ 5t_.f OG ~C_Pi:
- .-.a 1 M 49.w It 479;C -Y ; DG Ytl yt,y'.I;tC
.:r~= 1 3D 11Ii~u c_ ~ t' n:` [s! t!;.~
~y~r :r t'r)ieoc 1~7.-I~n
l f•_ ] I'. ~4L.F ~ - .
► c6 ~'t :Mf.•. 111
ir.E t t• o'.: nc i iL`i~
F~f ~t_-~-r'-:~p:Lt 1 6 W l:.7t50L . 'I'C
L7 rZL~.'t--1 .~.'f .~Yb'h 1 fb SiY7 <t lll/0 1~~• Y 1••. ~ lt
~1 I iEA{'77,,.Uf . ~ ~N ~/~J!~Mi 1!.I :tdG 1 i',r /.i _ { :4
24
► u ~ 'T*.~f~i: ~.rw 6~['=ef I 1 L_f.:_a ~c 1'
-01 l'e: O[! nf t~ll~ j:'S 1.IO:1~ ~~d5 TM„_i~.r:•E;~c=-N _~-~s ~ 1I.nmm s~.~a;._ I..od_or es c_lecn,:
1 u:~ltn t~~..,gc }~r:uu~xi
~ _.F' =1 n: YIDD s: i :a: u. cJp,mn ~u
_1r•, r._^:5~ uiN5~~3s~ T 600 f'G`= J. o m 1.,"
l~ ~f5 •.cu~:iv•.ti~:it N r~ir.:nn .~pooo 1',nnc
TJJ
4243 + 4!. eow p .I ►11sV+~ Cg' G •Qp ,z a~!-i: L.100. i:• e,- 7:
y ~a i~~-'i«iii is_E ~G' C;~•=► I tiu, iui
~0.` N'ixMG: Qt.~ 1~fb1:M~
s i1Yl~' 21713
•~•,Li.l?:',~s.~.'rF`Eir_V-L' J~: IS/ !tC00 I'J14'.~ t0 11 501GU (;:rOri•
•q~ - -.a'nPr: sCE.v.»trn~ 20 Oo N'~YU' Vi_ULC:. L~9sJ4a t_uu.;u
us[
11 ;c L'.7 7! >f
1 1:_;~'~~•.IM..~.- _ti.-F , -
c- Y 0 t.»:co llt L•..~" 11 l'~-'ib:
_Ti_~~~~~1[ t r0o0 i:oacr, 00 sr:c:.:
~ 1~ {-cf ~ ~ 'n~: ♦ .~G ri f M3 n'~~F tH t f i. ~ [C i~ - - !1 t .
T• {E !_7 A*[MC' ~IN~ 1~.5h1 L-~ 1f_ ! l~
t IN CsNr. n J U _~1.WC !:i ~ 0.' ^~04 L d- ' YU 1: t f ~.7
tIOC
1.
►n L i~ x aacrrTrl~7 + ~ C~ ~ D: 1~ ~_r toa _a
!!/0 L: 1 ti-iFIT 41i~iW: L] _i: ~0. u:l t7iVC001 ci ^t i_7D7a6 1- 4 ~
tl T06~ j:~ ._~+..n 'ar r 51A, IS L rtn fL'0.-Y' 1 Y~'rL`➢D:UC i• NC t~'
r x f :~a~:~ a: .•icH t i;^Y :e 1!3 ~fr-'i i3~ t~75 7~T.t'7a;
w~r ~i ► ~ WM►l~ ~tiawaa~ ~t~asnn
OcNeoUwB a • wurn ~es wWrtAwr oewu
{
LS {1I 'lASil~ {1'lJp96 1 {"✓11iY
~ ~ 1 ~
t ~ ~ ICUC' Ci r~E~IA-7 \ 1l:.:. FEEb 1 19 I 1!G 1 DI~ l!ILL90 f`>a S 1'.
VMI (G Y~~.■ 00
~TUHMYi Ti Jiv~~Ii ( Bl 411
. N'.` i:f4 :i
:FU ~t.t t N=a l.'.ifiFr:• ~ C fl 1 s_ `7.•
c
&Z _ i1!id1C
~ i ~f,v :i4 L%PP1 w.3.:!i iT~i-E ~ t-:v~i. tu ~~na_c i-_?e
11 INc ~ti
i•yr p i ~a0_0
2W tYs Fg= t i Nw m i160~ N._c n.- Mae _ H n]l.ne
83 . iEib NW-- .i; r, i'.ri.
~1 6 ~C•. 'Yr` :FnE ~F~ 1 1 ie: lil ,i:,_uC ]a OG ►e ese na
~ ~iEE -'."~~-~i'Ial,-~ M t•liu,l;' U]IIC i0L ]G t CC }IWC':U
1 I '.~.LC :F~ b.NCr~ 1 N: il: t7 IJC Lf. OC }~41: Y
i:Ci -_i :J E4 k ii x i i~m _TTV M
t + i ;'.i;:i.l-•1~f~Ata'n~irr:nTi£ i~W~, ti:]PCO IrXSx
t• ~ ~ ~~:.cn'iir:~.yT - • Ma u~ou:ro uacco: m s;:n:u~?! ~ ITR=?C"" ~;sviT".].wET" ~ 1./ Vk: 1A 47: _j _}'A•_ N t0 t_ :a~ _m
.1 I 1 IY~''P!E=- R,= F-i~;N+~/ 1 L•: "in •M.t' tllC t':: W Ti ~aa
1a/1Uti/rl~wwf..sd.rrr 7r~ {77~,t1f:4 RI alt~ inllrS7
%AM A%16c„ ti. s2!L i7otv_2 ~1(lt9H
iC'iffLxis'G'KeK.:irt,w]EAedfTlUl t•nitun'7 ~-~!l~f7a 1:I:'.iSd Q!
~:ural A CuY~1~~ED i•rrM.~ ~~rmrwl M 1kf~11~ 1 wA 0E~~k.~y ~We Vr~ 1 IIJIiA~.'1 I~ l:1fN 7~ ` I~.T7~tT~ U
C}1?!A HILL
9 Soulti Washing'an
Sutt°:4oo
, 3paEcene, WA 692Di •37bfl
~CH 290/B H I LL TCI 509.621.1664 z241
:~!t+ Fsx 509.2S2.''1Sti7
March'13;.20(}b
L-ouis Graf ` .
City.oF 5pokane;Valley-
I1707 East.Sprague Avenue; •
Suite :1.06
Spokane Valley; WA 99206
Di:ai L,ouis:
Enclo§ed a're the iesiilts "of'the bid openiiIg-fqr constri.ictioii of tHe.Barker Riiad
Iinprovemen!ts%SciuEh Greenacres 5anitary'SewEr projeet: The bid operiing was helcl_ on
March.l0, 2006 .at the $ja-ane~ Valley City Hall. Tcvn contractors submifted bid.c for hlus.
pxroject. .Tlie'bids axe~shoHTn on the.a:ttached Bid Tabulation.
11..a:shQwr-(, E11er:Carporationlsiibniitteci fhe lowest:cqrribined.taEsil of-the'bid proposals for
Schedule Ad1d'Sthediale'B: 'Ellex Corporatioii'•s coiiibiried'lotal bid aniioiirit is
;984.78, cxcludirig taz: ''I'he: Engineer`s,Fstimate for tfi"e'project dvork is $1r842;595:75.
'Our'evaluation oF the tiids.did riof reveal ariy_abnoima.liries or weighted-bidprices, tha# is,
bot11 bids appeac.to agree relatitrely'-svell with each other:a.Md,iyith the rngineer's :Lsrimate.:
All of r7.ie re:quired.iiifo.rmation was:.included.witli,tlie Eller.Cor..poratiori hid andBller
Corporation. appears En have'-the requisite qualifieations an&ezperierice to perfo'rm the
anticipated work. As a result, we.hereby recommeiid Eller CorpAration for award
eonsideration. 4Ve iindcrstanci Spokane County, ivith wlioni_thc City.has.a.Memorandurri
of Unde.r.staiidin~,for Sc~icdule B, concurs.rvith. this recoiiirxientlation.
If you tiave any-questions, please19ive:a}e a-call:,
Siricerely,
CH2AZ.HIC,L
~ ~ .
, . ,
jiyn Dii,gfield., PE :i
T'reject Vlanagei e:• MarkSfilrz/Spc?kKie=Coiinty
Attachment
SPK/Award KecoLilntenciation.do
c
. . CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
. : ' Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: March 28, 2006 City Manager Sign-off:
(tem: Check all that apply: ❑ consent 0 old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Certification Acceptance (CA) for Federal Highway Administration
(FHWA) Projects
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: N/A
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Informational iViemo dated March 21, 2006
BACKGROUND: See attached Informational Memo
; .
OPTIONS: 1) Approve Certification Acceptance Qualification Agreement
2) Provide additional direction to staff
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Motion to approve the agreement and authorize the
City Manager to sign the Certification Acceptance Qualification Agreement.
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: None
STAFF CONTACT: Neil Kersten, Public Warks Director
Steve M. Worley, Senior Engineer - Capital Projects •
ATTAC HMENTS:
. 1. Informational Memo
2. Certification Acceptance Qualification Agreement
S crn~
pO~]]-a.ne _
,;,00VaUey _
11707 E Sprague Ave Suite 106 ♦ Spokane Valley WA 99206
509.921.1000 ♦ Fax: 509.921.1008 ♦ cityhall@spokanevalley.org
. . . ~ _ , . m „ . , .•r,. . - ,:i.. _i . _a.__...___~
Informational Memorandum _
To: City Council - Meeting March 21, 2006
From: Shane Arlt, Assistant Engineer (CIP)
Thru: Neil Kersten, Public Works Director
' Steve Worley, Senior Engineer (CIP)
Date: PVlarch 21, 2006
Re: Certification Acceptance (CA) for Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Projects
Backqround
The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) through a Stewardship Agreement,
delegates authority to the Washington State Qepartment of Transportation (WSDOT) for
approving project development and construction* administration. WSDOT has the option
of delegating some or all of this authority to qualified local agencies, state or federal
agencies, or Tribal governments. This procedure permits an agency to retain more of
the approval authority at the local level when developing FHWA assisted transportation ,
projects. _
WSDOT delegates this authority through a Certification Acceptance (CA) program. The
CA program does not eliminate any project development procedures. Benefits of CA to
a local agency include savings in time and money since the agency has the authority to
develop, advertise, award, and manage its own projects. Another benefit is that only
agencies with CA status may construct federal aid projects using agency forces.
CA requires local agencies to commit sufficient staff and other resources to project
administration to ensure that all applicable state and federal requirements are met, and
that the work can be accomplished efficiently. Once an agency has been certified, the
certification agreement remains in effect indefinitely unless rescinded due to lack of
performance or modified by one of the parties. A CA agency has the option of requesting that WSDOT or another CA agency
administer any given project.'
Certification Acceptance Requirements
1. Projects must be administered in accordance wifh the Local Agency Guidelines
(LAG) rnanual. 2. Projects must be administered utilizing a Professional Civil Engineer registered in
the state of Washington who is either on staff as a public employee or is a .
contract employee designated as the agency°s Engineer. Pagc 1 of 2
3. The agency shall have sufficient expertise and capability to perform and
supervise the design, environmental, PS & E, and construction-administration
phases of the project.
4. The agency must have designated an official approving authority for all WSDOT-
, delegated project approvals. This author'rty (e.g., agency, executive or policy body) must officially approve each project step for which it is the approving
authority, as identified in the agreement. (See attached Certification Acceptance
Qualification Agreement).
Application for Certification Requirements
An agency applying to administer contracts under Certification Acceptance procedures
must submit a Certification Acceptance Qualification Agreement to the WSDOT Local
Programs Engineer.
After receiving the CA Qualification Agreement, the WSDOT Highways and Local
Program's Project Development Engineer will conduct an interview with the local agency
administrators to determine whether the agency is capable of administering an FHWA-
funded project. Areas of consideration will be a determination of past performance,
current staffing, overall capability, and knowledge of FHWA and state requirements.
Based on the interview, the Director of H&LP will allow the agency to administer a
project under a trial/mentoring stafus. Irnmediately following the completion of the
project, a Project Management Review (PMR) will be performed to evaluate how the
agency performed. A favorable PMR will result in the agency achieving CA status.
The WSDOT Highways and Local Programs have encouraged the City to apply for CA
status. They are confident that the City has the staff and resources to adrninister
Federal Aid Projects under CA status. Attached: Draft CA Application
Page 2 of 2
Certification Acceptance Qualification Aqreement -
AGENCY Citv of Sqokane Vallev AGENCY N0.1221 The agency agrees to compiy with the following requirements when developing all Federai
Highway Administration (FHWA) projects under FULL CA status.
1. Adherence to the Loca! Agency Guidelines and all policies and procedures promulg2ted by the
Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) which aooomplish the policies and
objectives set forth in Titie 23, U.S. Code, Highways, and the regulations issued pursuant thereto.
2. The overall approval aukhorities and conditions will be as follows: .
a. The project prospectus will be reviewed and approved by the following official.
Citv Manaaer
Position Title Only .
b. The local agency agreement will be reviewed and approved by the following official or officials.
Citv Mana4er "
Position Title Only c. The designs and environmental documents will be reviewed and approved by the following
state of Washington registered Professional Civil Engineer.
Senior Enaineer - Capital Proiects
Position Title Only -
d. The hearing's findings (if required) will be reviewed and approved by the following official or officials.
Citv ManaAer
Position Title or 1'itles Only
e. The contract plans, specifications and estimate of cost will be reviewed and approved by the
following state of Washington registered Professional Engineer.
Senior Enqineer - Capital Proiects
Position 7itle or Titles Only
f. Agreements will be signed by the following responsible local official:
(1) Railroad Citv Manaaer -
Position TitJe Only .
(2) Utility Citv Manaaer Position Title Only
(3) Consultant Cihr Pllanaaer
Position Title Only
(4) Technical Services Citv Manaaer
Position Title Only g. The award of contract will be signed by the following responsible local official.
. Citv Mana4er '
Position Title Onfy
h. All projects will be constructed in conformance with the Washington State Department of
Transportation/American Public Works Association (WSDOT/APWA) current Standard
Specifications for Road, 8ridge, and Municipal Constrcrctron and such specifications that modify .
these specifications as appropriate. Multimodal enhancement projects shall be constructed in .
conformance with applicable state and local codes. toral Agency GuidcJines M 36-63 • 1
October 2005 '
. i. The contraci administration will be supervised by the follawing state of Washington registered
' Professional Civil Engineer.
;
Senior Enaineer - Capital Proiects
Position Title Only
j. Construction administration and material sampling and testing will be accomplished in
accordance with the WSDO7 Constructron Marluaf and dhe Locaf Agency Gurdefines.
3. The agency agrees that they have the means to provide adequate expertise and will have
support staff available to perform the functions being subdelegated. The support staff may include
cansultant or state services.
4. The agency agrees that the signature on each project praspectus and local agency agreement
will be consistent with section 2 above.
5. All projects under Certification Acceptance shall be available for review by the FHWA and the
state at any time and all project documents shall be retained and available for inspection dunng
the plan development and construction stages and for a three year period following acceptance of
the project by WSDOT.
6. Approval of the local agency certification by the Director of Highways and Local Programs may
be rescinded at any time upon local agency request or if, in the opinion of the Director of
Highways and Local Programs, it is necessary to do so. The rescission may be applied to all or
gart of the programs or projects approved in the local agency certification.
~ City Manager Date
• WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT
OF TRANSPORTATION
Approved By:
Director, Highways and Local Programs Date
,
Local Agency Guidelines M 36-63 • 2 .
October 2005
CITY OF SPOKANE 11ALLEY Request for Councii Action
Meeting Date: March 28, 20D6 City Manager Sign-off_ I
Item: Check a11 that apply; ❑ consent Doldbusiriess
[71 new business ❑ public hearing
0 information ❑ admin, report ❑ pending IegRSlaEion
AGENDA fTEM 7ITLE: Landscape and Weed Cantrol Contract Bid Award
GOVERNING LEGISLl#TION:
PRE1f101JS COUNCIL ACTION TAF(EN: Approval of the 2006 County Street Niaintenance
llnterlocal on February 14, 206_ BACKGROUND: The Counfy provided weed spray services for the City since incorporation.
PrOC2re probided landscape senrices for selec#ed irrigated areas thraugh a con#ract managed
by the County including a24°lo rnanagement fee, The ProCare contract expired in Octaber
2005. The areas maintairred by ProCare iricluded the greerr areas aIong Sprague Avenue and
irrigated tfrainage facilities laca#ed throughiaut the City. Jn 2006, the City budgeted $81,057 for
the County weed spray and $37, 200 for the landscaping contract for atotal of $118,257,
The Ci#}r received bids for above weed spray and larrdscape wark arr Merch 15, 2006 from three
companies. The bid amounts are sLimmarized below;
- ProCare Earth Stone Senske Lawn & Tree
Developments Care
Cost Proposal I
$49,Q68,74 $96,251.95 $59,727,44
{inc. tax} 1"he selected contractor will provide landscape services far all irrigdted grassy areas awned by
the Cify, weed control of non-irrfgated drainage facilities and weed control of selec#ed pubfic .
right-of-way (RCVV). Landscaping services includes mowing, fertilizing, and rnaintaininq and operating the sprinkler systems. A detailed bid sheet Rs attached, The contract fs for ane year
wr#n tive one-year renewval options which ina}r be exercised by the City. The annual renevval
may be acljusted upward in an arnounk not to exceed the Cansumer Price Index tor All Urban
Consurners (CPI-U) or 3°la whichever Rs srnafler_ ProCare submitted a 5°lo bid bond and is
require d ta provicle a 100°lo perForma nce bond wi#h the execijtian af #he confac#.
OPTIQEVS: Award tne bid or no# award the bid,
RECOMMENDED ACTIOh! QR NIOTEON: Award the contract to ProCaria in the arnoun# of
549,068.74 and autharize tne City Manager to enter in#a the future five year renewable
contracts as provide in the bici docurnen#s.
BUDGETIFINANCEAL iMPACTS: The contract wiil be funded by tYre currerrt 2006 approved
budget, -
i
~ STAFF CO1VTACT: Nei[ Kersterr
ATTACHMENTS Bid Ta.b
~ SIJiV[_M:.A_RX SHEET (1 OF 2)
Earth Stone Senske Lawn
Base BIDS ProCare Developments Inc 8 Tree Care
I I I I
F3.~se }3id # 1
I I ~
Rid Itern Y. 1000-rUcotl Grove 1 $1,399.00I $2,110,00+ $1,290.70
Bid Icem # 1200- Mission Avenuc $48.00i $147.001 $49.00
Bid ltem # 130011400 Sprag«e Avrenue $14,565.001 $21,698.001 $15,069.00
T3id it:cm 4 lE►OCf - 32"4 Avenue ~ $70.001 $230.001 $79.801
Bid Ttern 9 1700- Sullivan Road 1 $4,655.001 $10,845.001 $6,317.14 '
131d Ttem 4 1900- Saltese 1 $190.00 $695.001 $210.00
Bid Item # 3200 -Applcwdy Poncl $100.00 $365.001 $100.00
Bid Item # 3300 -Universily & L7esmet $125.001 $455A01 $110.00
Bid Item 4 3400-y[issinn 1'onds 1 $2,083.001 $2,931.001 $1,866.50
Bid Ttcm # 3600 -Evergreen F'onds 1 $5,244.001 $9,830.001 $5,249.50 .
Bicl Item # 3700 -16d` .4venue Ponds 1 $8,008,001 $14,563.001 $7,992.00
) Base Bid # 1 SUBTOTAL I S36,487.001 $63,869.001 $38,333.64
.
I I I I
13ase Bid 9 2 I I I
Bid Item #5000 - Roadway & sidewalk Weedspray ~ $3,350.001 $13,680.001 $10,112.60
Base Bid # 2 SUBTOTAL ~ $3,350.001 $13,680.001 $10,112.60 ,
~ I I
i I I
BASE BID TOTACS • , ' , ' $39,837.001. - $77,549.001 $48,446.241
S'UMJl 1LX A ~HELT (L V F ~
? Earth Stone Senske Lawn
AL`URN.~~E 13H)S ProCare Developments Inc & Tree Care
JA[ternate Bid #J
~Bid Itern 11100- AppI curay ~ $310.001 $1,344.001 $392_00
IBid Item # 1500- Disliman Mjcti ~ $400,001 $1,6$0,001 $400_00
13id I[em 4 2000 T6" Bol ivar I $45.00 584_00I $30_00
Bid ltem #2 100-Yndiaoa Avenuc ~ $175A01 $640_001 $175_00
Bid ltem # 300O -Dickey ' Poncl ~ $40.00 1 $64_001 $21_O0
Bid ltem # 3100 -ParkRor1d Pond ~ $46.001 $168_001 $57_40
Bid ltem # 3500 -liurns Yond ~ $8o,00 1 $94_001 $60_00
~A] cern a cc Bia sUsToTAL #1 _ I $1,096,001 $4,074.001 $1,135.40
I I I ~
Alternate Bid 9 2
I'8 idIterr3 rr 3 840 - Chester Creek Pit ~ $950.001 $3,150,001 $1,100,001
~AL#erns4teRit1SLBTOTAJ, #2 ~ $950.001 $3,150.001 $1,100.001
Alternate Bid # 3
13 id.lte-m h! 400 0 Additionxf Draiiiage flrexs 1 $1,945_001 $2,266,001 a1,896,001 `
Alternate Sid S[TRTOTAL93 1 $9,945.001 $2,266.001 $1,896.001
Alternate 13id # 4
F3id Item # 60Q0 - Weed spray Addi#ional Areas .
11,355.00 $1,600.00 $2,420.00
AltcrnatcB id SUB'i'OTAL#4 1 $1,355.001 $1,600.QOI $2,420=1
I I ~ I I
AI~TERNATE BIQfiTb.TA;L~, 3'46,~QI 4
I I 1
eASE BfDS + ALrERNArF: BIaS $45,183.001 $88,e39.00 $54,997_64
-rax I $3,885.f4-1 $7,6j2_95 $4,729_80
' -
G RAh,~D'~T.~TAL 4'~
I
, CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action Meeting Date: 3/28/06 City Manager Sign-off:
Item: Check all that apply: consent ❑ old business ~ new business [I public
hearing 0 information ❑ admin. report pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Cost of living adjustment for non-represented employees.
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: None
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: During the FY 2006 budget preparation
process, funds to address prospective cost of living adjustments were provisioned. BACKGROUND: The City has been in negotiations with AFSCME to reach a collective
bargaining agreement for the represented employees. Negotiations began in April 2005
and are ongoing. By state law, wages for represented employees are determined
through the bargaining process.
The City's hope was to reach an agreement as quickly as possible, and to implement an
appropriate wage increase for all City employees_ Unfortunately, the City has not yet
reached an agreement with the collective bargaining unit, while at the same time the
cost of living has continued to rise. In fact, no cost of living adjustment has been made
since the City's incorporation in 2003. .
In recognition of this, this agenda item proposes a four percent (4%) wage adjustment
for all non-represented employees, to be made effective April 1, 2006. It may be prudent
for the City to further review consumer price indicators in three months to deterrnine if a
further adjustment is appropriate. OPTIONS: 1. Approve a cost of living adjustment. 2. Request further information 3.
Take no action.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: •
To authorize a cost of living adjustment of four (4) percent for non-represented
employees, effective April 1, 2006 and to reevaluate consumer price . indicators and their
cost of living effects in three (3) months.
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: No unanticipated impact on the city budget.
STAFF CONTACT: Nina Regor, Deputy City Manager
ATTACHMENTS: Nane
.
J
ECONOMIC IMPACT &
MARKET RESEARCH STUDY .
. ~
Spokane County Fair &
Expo Center: A One-Year A:Vl,l W O
Analysis (2005)
, J
5../
. Today's Objectives
. Provide'you with a physicaf copy of the
results. ■ Introduce myself and SBI.
■ Present the major findings. . . .
. Provide you with an opportunity for
questions & answers. , 1
1 SBI . Consultin frm t~tat prirr7aril~r measut'es the F~OY
associat~~ with sporE & entertainment properties via
economic irnpack ana[ysis and sponsorship evaluatians. .State B Basketball, Ironman 1laI leyfest, ACC 1Nomen's
Basketball, College Hockey Arrrerica, etc..
. Adjunct profe5sor at Gonzaga Universitj for the Spart
. Management program.
o Received my dockorate at Univ, ofi Norkhern Colorado
with a doctoral rninor in Statistical Research Meti7ods.
■ Sport Marketing Research Institute
The StL1d}IfS ObJectIVes .
■Capture the econor,nic impack associated w/the
Fair & Expo Center over a one-year period
~ (zoo5). -
n Nieasure the ecanomic rmpact associated w/the
2005 Interstate Fair. - o Evaluate attendee & vendor satisfackion.
o Conduct market research for each individual prornoter in exchange for access to th&
; vendors & attendees.
2
i
f _
The Total
Economic Impact
■ $24,235,909 -
Economic impact- only considers spending, from non-
residents (30 miles).
. Local spending is not economic impact, it's recycling.
. Sales multiplier of 1.5.
. Did not utilize cookie-cutter approach.
■ Did nofi include Indians Baseball (AVISTA).
■ 99 events representing 259 event days. .
Interstate Fair Impact
• $6,051,393 . Non-residents not included (30 miles,).
■ The 10-day event attracted 193,201
attendees (20% NR) and 253 vendors
(42% N R) .
3
. Basic Methodology . How did we come up with those numbers?
. Categorized all Fair & Expo Center events into 5
segments.
. Conducted on-site survey research at events
representing each segment.
. Applied the averages from each study to the
events in each corresponding segment.
Attendee & Vendor
Satisfaction
. A variety of questions were asked regarding attendee & vendor satisfaction.
• Customer service analysis
. Feedback regarding $18 million renovation 4
Results ■ 86% of attendees & 82% of vendors
agree or strongly agree that the facifity is
in excellent condition. .94% of attendees & 87°!0 of vendors
intend to return next year.
■ 55% of the attendees agree or strongiy
agree that the concessions quality was
excellent**
Facility Recommendations
. More maps & information
■ Provide ACJventilation , .
. More restrooms & showers ' -
. Continue w/current improvements
. Wider aisles
.Larger buildings
. More shade*
. Better seating*
. More drinking fountains* . .
.
5
So what does all of this mean?
. We now have a baseline regarding the Fair & .
Expo Center & the Interstate Fair (as an -
economic stimulator)
. We have the ability to evaluate the value of
events by profitability and/or community
economic impact.
• Opportunity for improvements, additions, &
confirmation that renovations were successful
(positive impact).
Any Questions?
Chris Frye, Ph.D.
Sport Business Interes#s, Consultant ~
(509) 869-0299
www.sportbusinessinterests.com
chris@sportbusinessinterests.com S170R'I' BUSI1jESS
J.l V rC.llKl:eS1tS
6
- CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: iVlarch 28, 2006 City Manager Sign-off:
Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent I] old business Q netiv business ❑ public hearing
❑ informaRion x admin. repor# ❑ pending legislakion
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Communications Infrastructure Grant Update
GOVERNING LEGISLATION:
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN:
♦ BACKGROUND:
This in[ormalional upda[e is presented to you to give you the current sta.tus of the COPS
Inceroperable Communications Technology grant. A.s you inight recall from iny November 29,
2005 presentation, the City of Spokaale and tlie other Spokane Couiity partners.jointly applied for
and were aw2rded agrant for a total of $4;000;000 in invcstment towarcis building a community-
widc communications infrastructure syslem. The inilial application for the graut included a
proposal regarding t.'our niajnr components:
1) 5995;685.00 that would Fund upgrading existuig equipmeut and anteiuia sites, and would
also establish imProved r.ammunication pattis b}° use of additional microNvaves. These
microwaves vvill increa.5e reliability and save on reoccurruie costs for T1 links.
. 2) $2,000,000.00, 150 Project 25 (P25) VHF" digital repeater and voter decks. Tlus newly
uitegrated systcrri providcs direct intEraperability and seaniless expansion, ancl will
ultimatelv allow regioii al user.s to better coordinatc first response.
3) $1;000,000.00 for one Gateway network. This Gateway gives first responders the ability
to talk across mulliple agencics and is the beginning stage of a tiiulti-agency radio
network. This allows cotnmuruca.tions in support oFemergenc;y response and day-to-day
opcraiions. Ic also ties radin users, dispatch centers ancl command and control facilities
together. "1`his bridges our ability to activate the systetlis at thc moment ihey need it in
any emergency. It also allows for cligital encr}tption and includes adequate firewalls.
- 4) $4,325.00 in COPS L-rantee tccfulical assistance. These dollars are utilized to provide
technological assistance in the development aiid governance of the grant.
We are currently tiiceting as a lcadership forum and are discussiug any possible changes that
; may be reauired in the origuial application for the grant. This is an ougoing process and may
- require some Additional cnbinecring input.
I have previously informed the Council about the discussions taking place on how our
cotnmunity woulcl fund the $1,000,000.00 matchuig fund r.equirements. Our initial analysis
providcd the attachcd document (Attachtnent #1) showing each entity's original ccmh-ibutions
based upon population and applied as a pcrceiit~~ge to the total. Since that initial update eo the
Council, we have been mecting to discuss the monctary contributions that nught be applied tn the
$1,000,000.00 in matcliinD funds by our local Fire PartnerS. We are privilcgcd in this
conutnuiity to share a close worlcing relationslup xvith those Fire pamiers and have negotiated a
tentativc 50-50 split as applicd to the match. Based upon those figiires, I have also attached a
financial analysis (Altachment #2) that shows the contributions rEquired by each of the entities,
basically reducing each entity's contribution by SO%. All that being said, the formula includes
Spokane Valley being responsible For the populatian of 85,010, which equates to 19.48% of the
total population. 19.4$% of $1,000,000.00 equals $194,843.00. After the Fire concribution of
50%, the fund'ulg that would be requested &om the City or Spokane Valley Nvill total $97,421.00.
'I`his grant is being managed by the City of Spokane and all bill'uig Nvould occur directly froui the
.
Spokanc Police Departmcnt. As you recall, the grant is spread over a three-ycar time framc, and
we will have further disciissions about how the City of Spokane Valley would choose to make
payment over that three year5 or in asingular one-time billing, if"aPproveci.
niis data is providcd for informational pluposes only at this timc. I am not requesting any actual
funding but wanted to update the Council as to the paths being discussed by the Leaciership
Forum and the potential impacts to the City of Spokane Valley. I ani confident there -vvill be ,
additional updatcs and a latcr formal request, qnce all of the informatian is compiled, double . '
checked and agreed upon hy each of the enfities involved. I ,,%ill be happy to answer any
queskibns.
OPTIONS:
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION:
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: STAFF CONTACT: Chief Cal Walker
ATTACHMENTS
1- COPS FY 2005 Interoperable Communications Technology Program Match Portion
2- COPS FY 2005 Interoperable Communication Technology Program Financial Analysis
iT-7--: `Ta4, . ..ro ~ C,,aU.~OG w~ ~1~~~r-@`~ y~ k=~,ey,gatr'}',y+' •~:w.a°''rj-Rz~^~'~".+~~~)r "~y 'P.~:t,
~ wtt,,~W . wT' Wy,~ Wl ~ I'S'I /'l'~~ ('~~~fRw~'~~~hP~~~~~~':~+.u~~Z~~'T-• • '7i Ti _ `ry-_ '
!
Ci4y Population Percentage
Unincorporated 121,848 27.93°lo X 1,000,000= $279,276
Airway Heights 4,640 1.06% X 1,000,000 = $10,635
Cheney 10,070 2.31%X 1,000,000= $23,080
Deer Park . 3,100 0.71% X 1,0OO,OdO = $7,105
Fairfield 589 0.13% X 1,000,000 = $1,351
Latah 212 0.05% X 1,000,000 = $486
Liberty Lafce 5,255 1.20% X 1,040,000 = $12,044
Niedical Lake 4,350 1.40% X 1,000,000 = $9,970
Millvroad 1,645 0.38% X 1,000,000 = $3,770
Rackford 484 0.11% X 1,000,000 = $1,109
Spangle 269 0.06% X 1,000,000 = $617
Spokane 198,700 45.54% X 1,000,000 = $455,421
Spokane Valley 85,010 19.48% X 1,000,000 = $194,843
Waverly 128 0.03°/a X 1,000,000 = 293
- 436,300 100.00% $1,000,000
'Population percentage is based on the Washingfon Sfate OFM Forecast, 4I1/05
aca.. w» w'~Y:.a:,~~`~o~~ w~> ro+ kv~c.. S h~, ,K:.a:.. ~+wa~ ,~n~ocAyN,3i....:; , fP,y,.v ~ 2~ rc wz. a~. w+ a• .•.+:,~•,%e✓S
k r~a`'osa< } x. .,R q 2, ~~a« 4 L a x~~'C4 .F o y Q++( i.~,if„t ..f ,~~,a ac w 4 of 4. Y ?w.?4A C 2x~ wi
?t ~ ~ s slk:~`4" cL`„E~L° ~~~4'f~ r acrY ?9`3~'N Y"+~'a ~''SL a~ ,f•csQ<~.`k J'~,K'a{ 6~ n i o.L~ w~~ Fwc .?S'SiaR"~or~7c~~'2t~ ~'t4~`~~.~~;C aS 4x1'°o->o:t .
Yye< K,L.yc w`.cCa oxfi} 3,R~ ti'S'x~,R~'A''6i''c.~G°R.Kx'a o~ws,r~,,...roY.$~ ~b.~~ w.Sf }:.,x,oC~.a. ~ y°c~.G~Yzc'p'J~f 3 l c,i•,~ A.A. o~ ~~`awaf.F~ ' .
City Population Percentage Match Portion *SCSO Amt
Unincorporated 121,848 27.93% X 1,000,000 = $279,276 / 2= $ 139,638 Fairfield 589 0.13% X 1,000,000 = S1,351 / 2 = $ 676
Latah 212 0.05% X 1,000,000 = $486 / 2= $ 243
Rockford. • 484 0.11 % X 1,000,000 = $1,109 / 2= $ 555
Spangle 269 0.06% X 1,000,000 = $617 / 2= $ 308
W7verly 128 0.03% X 1,000,000 = $293 /2 147
. $283,132 $ 141,566
Contract Cities (County to be reimbursed at Year End Settle & Adjust)
Deer Park 3,100 0,71% X 1,000,000 = $7,105 /2 3,553
Milfwood 1,645 0.38% X 1,000,000 = $3,770 /2 1,885
x~ c;a.c:•'~s~ r
Other Cities (Billed directly by Spokane Police Department)
Ain,vay Heights 4,640 1.06% X 1,000,000 = $10,635 / 2= $ 5,317
Cheney 10,070 2.31% X 1,000,000 = 523,080 / 2 = $ 11,540 .
Liberty Lake 5,255 120% X 1,000,000 = $12,044 / 2= $ 6,022
Medical Lake 4,350 1.00% X 1,000,000 = $9,970 / 2= $ 4,985 Spokane Valley 85,010 19.48% X 1,000,000 = $194,843 / 2= $ 97,421
Spokane 198,700 45.54% X 1,000,000 = $455.421 / 2= $ 227,710
436,300 100.00% $1,000,000 $ 500,001
:a^'~R'~ Y'~.ifiCl,~~t"~'4{a•~Y~~~:aYayt°i~a7nit~C:o .
2 ^4 4 ~
. ~ t ~
'`Spokane Fire Department to pay 50% of Match Portion
"Balance will be used to hire a Communications Engineer
- CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: March 28, 2006 City Manager Sign-off:
Item: Check ail that apply: ❑ consent '[J old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
information X admin. report ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Lodging Tax Revenues, Attorney General Opinion '
GOVERNING LEGISLATION:RCW 67.28.180
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: None -
BACKGROUND: As the Council knows, the City receives and then distributes a portion of the
lodging tax collected by the State of Washington. The expenditures by the City for these funds
are proscribed by RCW 67.28, and must be for tourism-related things. The statutes regarding
what can be included in the definition of "tourism-related" are somewhat ambiguous, and leave
some room for interpretation. As a result, a Washington State senator requested an opinion
from the Attorney General's office based on three questions. I will not repeat the AG's opinion
C1 in this RCA, as the opinion is short and easily understood.
~ The reason the questions were asked was that some jurisdictions were attempting to get
creative in the way they spent their lodging tax funds. When questions were asked by the State
Auditor's Office, responses were somewhat equivocal. This particular Senator chose the
imminently rationale approach of posing the questions to the AG's Office.
The responses provided by the AG are not legally binding, but a reviewing Court would look to
them as a well-informed opinion, and would likely give it substantial weight in coming to a
decision.
It is important to note that the responses to the questions are consistent with the approach
taken by the City of Spokane Valley when confronted with these or similar issues.
OPTIONS: N/A -
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: N/A
BUDGETIFINANCIAL IMPACTS: N/A
STAFF CONTACT: Cary P. Driskell, Deputy City Attorney; Mike Connelly, City Attorney
.
ATTACHMENTS: Copy of Attorney General Opinion AGO 2006 No. 4
Authorify of mwiieipality to allocate lodging tax revenues to facilities in ,vhich che munic... l?age 1 nf 5
is00 WiOKQ1111D HTTORNE7 tiEPtERAL OP mVASNIh6iDN
LQDGING TAX - C7TIFS AND TOWniS - COUiNT[ES - TUURISNI - PUBLIC h'CTNTDS -
Authority [►f municipality to allocate lodging t<<x revenues to facilities in which the aiunicipality
has nu ownership iuterest.
L A municipality lacks authority to allocate lodging tax revenue to operatc a tourism-related
facility in which the municipality has no ownership interest.
2. A municipality may not spend lodging tax revenue on operating expeuses of specifil events and
festivals clesigncd to attract tourists where such events aud festivals are operated by non-
govcrnmental entities. 3. A municipality may not provide advance payment to private organizations for tourism
promotion; Payment must occur after the scrviccs have been performed:
February 2, 2006
Thc !-Ionorable Karen Fraser
Washington Statc Senate _
P.O. r3os 40422 Cite As: `Olyinpia WA 98504-0422 AGO 2006 No. 4 -
Dear Senator FraSer:
Ry letter previously acliiowledgeci, you have requested our opinion on the following questions:
iNiusr a municipality havr' an ownership interest in a tourism-relateci
facility in order to allocate loclging tax revcnttes rec:eive.d undcr 'RCW 67.28.1$0
and .ltil i:or the opcr9tinn of that tourism-rclated facility?
2. May a municipality sperid lodging tsir revenue on npe.ratiing eYpenses of
specitil events and fcstivals designed to attract tourists which are oPerxted by nou-
municipal entities?
3. Nlay a municipality enter into contracts ivith tourism promotion a;encies
that providc advanc;e payment of hotcl-matel titx revenues for tuurist promotion?
http://«~N,~v.atg.wa.gov/opiruons/2006/2006_4.hmi 3/24/2006
A.uthority of municipality to allocate lodging tax revenues to facilities in whir.h the muiuc... Page 2 of 5
[dYlgllt(lI pClge 2J MEF ANS`VF'R
.~1 Wc aclhere to our eonclusion in AGO 2000 No. 9 that a rnunicipclllfy iT1USt I1aVG aIl OWT1eCStU].l
i.nterest in tow-ism-related facilities iri order to spend lodg,ing tax revenues on tlie opcration of such
facilities. A ulunicipality may not spenci lodginb tax rcvenues on operating cxpE:nses of special cvents
and festivals which are operateci by uon-municipal entities. Rather, Nvith reSPect to such events, the
municipality may only spend loclbuig tax revenues on advertising and promotion. A municipality may
not provide Advance payments of lodging tax rcvenues to sen7ice providers. Payment must bc macie
after ttie fact, supported by appropriate documentation. -
ANALYSIS .
. L. N1ust a municipality havc au ownership interest in a tourism-rclated
facility in order* to .illoeate lodging tax rcveilues rece.ived undcr RCVV 67.28.1.80
and .181 fur thc operation of that tourism-related facilityr?
Statutocv backEround.
RCW 67.28 has evolved considerably since its enactmcnt in 1967. In its irutial form, RCW
67.28 simply ltithoriied Kivg County to inipose a ladbing taY for the purpose of fuliding the
development of stadiuin facilities. T aws of 1967; Reg. Sess., ch. 236; § 14. Tn 1970, this authorit~, was
cxtenciecl to the citics oE' Spokane and Tacoma (Lzws of 1970, 211d rx. Sess., eh. 89, 5 1), alid then in
1973 to mosl Uther municipalilies (Laws of 1973, 2nd Ea. Sess.; c.h. 34, S 5). Iu 1973; the Legislahire .
also authorized the developmcnt of epnvention ccnter E'acilities (Laws of 1973, 2nd Fx. Scss., ch. 34, S
(J ~ 1). In 1979, the Legislature added performing arts centers and visual arts centers to the list of authorizcd
facilities (T.,a,,vs of 1979, 1st Ex. Se.ss., ch. 222, S 5). In 1986, certain cc►unties 3nd cities Nvere authoriied
to develop tall shiPs (Laws of 1986; ch. 308; § 1). In 1988, certain cities and counties were auLhorized
to rcfurbi5h and opc.rate steatn rail-ways (LaNvs of 1985; Ex. Sess., cli. 1, 5 24).
lu acldiiion to inercasing khe utimber af municipalities authorized to unposc the lodging tax and
broadcning the ai1ay of facilities tliat municipalities were authorized to develop, the T egislahire also
' au010rized certain activities other lhail the clevelopment of facilities. Thus, for eaample; in 1979, thE '
Legislahu-e e.nacted amE.nciments to RCW 67.28 wfiich included, a.inong other things, auttiorizaiion for
municipalities "to pay for advcrtising, publicizing, or otlieitivise distribuiing information for che purpose
of attracting visitors and encouraging taurist expansion .vhen a caijnty or city has irnposed such tax for
sucti purpose, ar as one of the purposes hereuncier" (Laws of 1979, lsc Ex. Sess.; ch. 222, S 5). -ln 1956,
certc-uri municipalities in "ciistre•ssed areas°" (Laws of 1986; eh. 308, 5 1) were-authorized to tLsc lociging
tax revcnues "to develop strategies to expand tourisrn," which autiiority in 1990 was ea-tended to all
municipalicies (LaNvs of 1990, ch. 17, § l). Eventually-flor a tiille-certain cilies were authorized to
iIse Iqdginj tax proceeds for funding "special evcnts or festivals" (Laws of 1992, ch. 202, § 1), wid
cit:ies and cotunties were authorized, under speeified conditions; to prpmoCe "civic fcs[ival[s]" (Laws pf
1995, cli. 290, § 1).
(originnl pab e 31
.
T'hc 1997 amendiiients to.R.CW 67.28.
1n 1997; the i egislaturc enacted nuliierous arnendments to RCW 67.23. These amendmcnts
repealed jurisdiction-spec.ific grants of aut:hority to impose lodgulg taaes and to undcrtake touriscn-
related activities. The Legislature eorresPondin;ly tmifieci the taxing provisions as well as tlie
authnrizuig provisions for totu-ism acti-vities. 7"he 1997 Zmendments included a restatement of the
purposes for Nvhich lodging taY receipts may be expcnded aiid, relatedly; the adoption of several key
http:l/w,~"i,.at,g.wa.pov/o>>uuons/2006/2006 4.htm 3/24/2006
Authority of municipality to allacate lodging tax revenues to facilities in which the mimic... Page 3 of 5
definitions of operative-statutory terms.
We have carefully reviewcd the 1997 amendmenis; as well as the entirc legislative history of the . .
relevant scctions of RCW 67.28. Suffice it to say tliat the languaec of RCW 67.28 is far froln clear with
respect to a municipality's authorily vel non to speud lodging ta, rcceipts on the operations of non-
goverrunentall}° wwmed Facilitics. We acknowledge that reasonable arguments cali be made in support of
thE proposition that mtulicipalities do possess such authority. On the otfier hand, a.,~ evidcnced by AC70
. 2000 No. 9, reasonable arguments can be made to the contrary. Jn the interveui.ng years sincc that
opuuon wa.s issued, thc Lep-islature has nht amendcd RCW 67.28 in a maiuier that would lead us to alcer
the conclusion we reaclied in that opiruoti. Tllis fact (couplcd with [he persistcnt interpretive issucs that ,
RCW 67.28 has raised) leads us to conclude that a legislative amendment to RCW 67.23 expressly
providing authority for municipalitics to eYpend lociging tas receipts on ttie operations oF' non-
govennmentally owncd facilities wQuld be thc most efficaciqus and appropriate manner by which any
such state public Polic•y decision could be evidencECl. .
2. May a municipality spe»d lndging tas revenue on operating expcntics of
special events and festivals designed to attract tUurists which arc operated by non-
municipal entitics? •
The legislative history of uiunicipal auChority to fimd tourism facilities and events reflects zn
inerEmental; even surgieal, approach tn pcalicy making. As nolecl above, in its initial forni, RCW 67.2$
simply authorized King County to develoP sladium facilities. FventLia11y; the Legislaturc authorized
LU
mtuiicipalicies to provide tourist information and to fund ccrtaui k.inds of cvents, in adciition to
authorizing the development of a Mder anay ot' facilities. "1"hus, fi>r example, i_n 1992 certain cities were autliorired to use lociging tax procecds for funding "special events or festivals" (Laws of 1992; cli. 202,
§ 1); aud in 1995, citics and counties werc authorized under specified conditions to promOle "ciVic
festival[s]" (Laws of 1995, ch. 290, § 1).
Significaiitly, the 1997 amcndinents to .RCW 67.28 elini.i.nated the laiiguage that authorizeci
direct espendil'ures of lodguig tax receipts for special events and festivals. As aiuended, the rclevant
language of 1tCW 67.28 now providcs t}iat, "All revenuc fram taxes ['originaf page 41 unposed txncler
this chapter shall be uscd solely for the purpose oP paying all or any part of the cost of tourism
promotion, acquisition of tourism-related iacilities, or operacion of tourism-related facilities." RC`V
67.28.1815. The orily part o(' this language that is arguably relevani to the- question of expenditure.s i'or
events or f:e~tivals.is tie reference to "tourism prom4tion." ""1"ourisin promotion" is clefined to tnean:
activities anci expend'ihires designed to increase lourism, uicluding but not limiied to
advertising, publicizing, or otlierwise distributuig information t'or the purpose af
attxacting and welcomi.ng tourists; developing strategies to expand tnurism; operatuig
tOtLrism promoLion agenciES; and .f.-unding marketing oi' special events and festivals
designed to attract toitrists.
RCW 67.28.080(6) (emphasis added). The Legislature's oNun language eaplicitly restricts event and
festival-related eYpenditures to thc "marketing" of such activities. "C'hcre is simply no room to interpret
L2J this language. _
, 3. May a municipality enter into contracts with tourism promotion agcncies tliat provicle aclvance payment of hotel-motcl taY reveuues for tourist prtymotion:r
http://www.at2_.wa.gov/opinions/2006/2006_4.htm 3l24/2006
flut}lority of municipality to allbrate lodging tax revenues to faeilities in which the munic... Page 4 of 5
Your third question asl<s whether a mLLnieipality may enter into cUntracts widi totu'ism proniotion
i~agEncies that pr.ovidc acivance payment ofi lodguig tax revenues f.or tourist promotion. Ynur letter rcfers
~ J to an informal adviee iiizmorandiun fi-oi-ii tfus ofrice, which concluded that sucll advance payments are
nUt pen~-iitted. Your letter goes on to obscrve lhat, "NN'liile therc is a need for accoimtability in
eapenditures; this nturow analysis has bcen used in several instanees in spite of the pcri`armance-based
contraccs, procedures in place to assure that services are [nrigitta/ page .i/ provided, and thc lacl: of
alternative rESOUrces for tolirism promotion activities provided to cities mid counties; pau-ticularly by
e.cpressly-fornied nonprofiLs."
We recogivze ihat the "distributicm" and "allocation" of lodDing taY proceeds to certain non-
prafit tourism promotiou agencies (that is provicled.fnr under RCW 67.28.140) creates thc potential for
eonPusion regarcling the application of RCW 42.24.0$0, t4 which your lettcr refers. Nevei-aielcss, rathec
t:han resting on a"narrow" reaciing of TZCW 4224.080, wc believe ehat t)le conchision chat advance
pa_yments to tourism promotion ageneies is not pcrmitted Eollows from a straighl•-foitivard applieacion of
tlle plain language of this provisinn. In pcrtinent part, tlus provision reads as follows:
L1
.All cluirrrsC I presented against any county, city, district or other municipal corporation
or poliiical subdivision by persons fiu-nishing niaterials, rcndcriiig services or pcrforniing.
labor, oj• for uriy otlter contrctelt.{ctl ptrrpose; shall be audited, beforc payment, 'by ari
auditing officer The f-orni shall provide for the authcntication and certification by
such auditing olTicer t1iat the macerials have been furnished, the servicES rendered or thc
labar performed as d'escribed, 1nd chat the claim is a just; due and unpaid obligatinn
against thc municipal corporaiion or political subdivision; and Mo claim .s1rn11 be paid
11J11E102(I S2fCI1 C17,11I1ei7I1CC1IlOYI QP1CI Ce1't1fCC111()Y1[.~
.
RCW 42.24.080 (eiiiphasis acided).
. Tlie above-quoted language by its terms is extremely broad; applying to anv "contrac:tual
purposc.=" We are awarc of no specific provision that wottld countermaitd TtCW 42.24.080 artd thus
m
perinit municigalities to make advance payrnents of f.unds to to«rism prpmation a.gencics. Indeed, thc
T egislature tias rriade some narrow exceptions to thc general rule aggainst advance payruents,.but these
exc.eptions c1o not extend to paymenis to tourism promoeion agencies.
l'origitral page 6/ CQNCT.. US [UN
The long and ,v~inding roaci that tlie Legislat«re has travelcd in develaping public poliey on the
prornotion of rourisin and the related cxpenditures of lod-oing tax reeeipts bAS prornpced many
intcrpretive questions along che Nvay, Indeed, Che fact kltat this opinion is the th.ird formal opinioti that
lhis nf.rice has issued in Che past tCn years on ttle subject oi" RCW 67.28 evidences lhis uncertaintv.
Rcasonable minds cui differ on many of these queSlions. NeverthclESS, f4r the reasons discussed abovc,
we adhcre to our couclusion in ra(='IO 2000 No. 9 that amuiucipality must have a property interest ui a
facility that supports tourism or accommodates iourisi aceivities in orcier to speiici iodgirig tax receipts on
the operations of sucll a facility. WE also conelude that munieipalities arc not autliorized to spencl
lodbing tax receipts to Fund special evcnts or festivals. 1 inally, we conclude that mtnicipaliCies may not
makc advance payments to the providers of toiirism-related services.
, We trust tlic foregoing Nvi11 provc useful to you. httn:/l,~ti,~,vw.ata.wa.gov/opinions/2006/2006 4.htm 3/24/2006
Authority Uf mimicipali .ty to allocatc lodging ta;-, revenues to facilities in whieh tli.e munic... FagE~ 5 of 5
Sincerely,
R.OB MCKL'i\ NA •
Attorney GEneral
R(7BL12T J. FALLIS
Assistant Flttoriiey General
:pmd
U
In 1979, the Leoislacure enacted amEndrnents to RCW 67.25, wliich included, among ather things, aut}►ori2ation
far municipalities "to pa}, for acivcrtising, publiciung, or othenvisc distriUuting information for the purpose of attracting
visieors antl encnur3jing rou.rist expxnsion when a counry or city has imposecl such tax for such purpose, or as anc of the
purposes hereiinder". I.aws of 1979, lst Ex. Sess., ch. 222, g 5.
U
See State v. Costich, 152 Wn?ct 463, 470, 98 P.3d 795 (2004) (where language is troambiouous, court gives
effect tn that laneuage alone; Lejislahue is presucnecl to say what it means and tnean what is says). [n,AGO 1995 No.10, this
oflice discussed the meaninS of.'thc ttien-esisting statutory laoguage [hat authorized lodging tax cxpeildinjres for "advertising,
publicizing; or othenvise distributuig inf'onnation for the purpose of amacting visitors and encouraging tuurist expansipn"
and for "clevelop[ing] strategies ta expand tourism". AGO 1995 T'o. 10, at 2. AGO 1995 Na. 10 coilcluded, in part, tliat the
aUove Ianguane cnuld not be reacl to authorize nnmicipslities to fund special events and testivals; othenvise, the t.hen-existing
provisos which the opininn found to authorize expenditures for such events and festivals would be redundlnt. AGO 1995
No. 10, at 5. Thc 1997 amendments to RCW 67.28 retauied substsr►tial]y uitact, in the clefinition of "tuurism promotion," the
above-referenced language. As noted above, howevrr, no provisos or other language 1uthorizing direct e_xpenditures for
special events or festivals were included in ttie 1997 3menclments. This seems to have been understood by others at the tirne, . ' a,s well. See H.B. Rep. on Substitute S.B. 5867, »tli Leg., Reg. Sess. (Wash. 1997), at 5(sucnmary of "testuuony for"
amendmencs to RCVV 67.23 indicate.s that amendments "will help commun.ities fund proniotinn activities for fcstivals aud
o[her evenrs."). See also l,t re Bale, 63 Wn.2d 83, 89, 385 P2d 545 (1963) (Legislaturc is presumecl facniliar with own prior
legislation; "(11n construing statutes which re-enact; with certain chanees, or re.peal oiher staeutes, or which contain revisiqns
[to earlier laws]; resort tA repealed and supersedecl statutcs cnay be had, and is nt great impnrrance i.n ascercaining the
intention of the Legislariire, for, where a material chinge is made in the wrording of a statute, 1 change in Iegislative purppsc
rr►ust be presumecl.") (citacions oniitterl); Stute v. Roggenktrmp, lS:i Wn.2d 614, 624; lOC P.3d 196 ( 2005) (draftei^sof
le;islation are presumed to havc used no superfluous wrords, and courts must accord mcariuie, if passible, to every Hrord)
(citations omitted). _
, ~ .
- "Claims" is not defineci in statut.e. "Ilius, it is to be giveu its ordinary me3nin~. Dictionaries are an appropriate
source for detemiining that me.aning. Davis v. Uep't of FmpL Sec,, 104 Wn2d 272, 737 E'.2d 1262 (1987). "Clairr►" melns to ask for especiallv as a right, to take as the rightfiil awner; or to a.ssert in the f'3ce of possiblc contradiction. Merrlum-
Webster Onl,ine Dictionary faund at vrip://w%tiw.m-w,com/dietionaiy (visitcd January 26, 2006).
.U
Ypur letter refers co certai.n t:ypes of contractual protections which you suggest render unnecessary a prohibition
on acivance payments. At ]east up ro ehe presenc, the Legislature has not found these rypes of contracmal proteetions to be
incansistent with, or a subseitute for, a policy against advance payrnents to eontractors. State agencies are generally
nrohibited from inaking xdvaiice paymenls to contraccors despite the staie's consistent use of a battery of strong contractual
protections in favror uf i[s ageneies. See RC1'V 43.88.160(5) (proliibiting aclvance paymcnts to cantractors except for certain
mainienance agreements and subscription services).
U)
,See RCW 42.24.035 (providing an exception to the usual prohibition on advance payments by public agencies
ajid municipal corporations for payments for' publications anct periodical subscriptions chat are made "in a manner as %
c.onsistent as possible and practicable Wich normal -and usual btisiness metllods, and 'us the case of subscriptions, for periods
not in exccss of three ycars").
tittp:/hu4vw.atg.wa.gavlopinionsl2006/2006_4.hlm 3/24/2006
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: March 21, 2006 City Manager Sign-off:
Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ❑ admin_ report ❑ pending legislation • . AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Administrative Report re: Solid Waste System Status and
Agreements
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: City of Spokane Valley Resolution NO 03-024.
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: . The City of Spokane Valley City Council approved
Resolution 03-024 on the 27th of March, 2003. As directed by that resolution the City entered
into an INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT (CH. 39.34 RCW) BETWEEN THE CITY OF SPOKANE, SPOKANE COUNTY AND THE'CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY RE: SPOKANE REGIONAL SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM on the 30th day of June, 2003.
BACKGROUND: The City of Spokane Valley, in the agreement identified above, agreed to:
exercise its police and contractual powers and authority as may now or hereafter be
recognized in contract or at law to direct the deposit of Solid Waste generated within its
geographical boundaries to the System.
The term of this agreement is as follows:
A. This agreement shall be for an initial term of 8 years or for such longer term as any
Bonds or Additional Bonds remain outstanding. B. This agreement can be terminated early only by written agreement of the City of
Spokane, Spokane County, and the Signatory Regional City. Upon terrnination of the
Agreement, the City shall own the System and all of its assets....
This administration report is to discuss the City's current and future options and obligations.
OPTIONS: NA/ information only
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: NA
BUDGETIFINANCIAL IMPACTS: NA
STAFF CONTACT: Mike Connelly, City Attorney
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Slide show presentation
2. Resolution 03-024
3. INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT RE: SPOKANE REGIONAL SOLID WASTE
MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
i ,
da
As
411
~ ~~l; - . . _ . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . ~ . , . . . ,
~ _ ~ , ~ . . ..~4:~ . . ~ . ~
ANk
. . ~ ' : . . ~
J ,
{
. . f. r~ . r : _ : ~ Y • ~ .
:':i.. ..N- .
. . ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ . .
~ .
;.~r ,Q~I X`a x~ ,1 . Q ' ` 1.;., M1 a'~'f
J
:~~°~~~`_J
~ ~ z: ~ i : ~ ~ ' _ - 1 { . 1~ . . t ~ ~3~~~3~~ ~ ; r S .
: as:1~t'''S ; kr . t ; . ~ ~=i , _ .
r .r..,'.
c
~ ~C, C Y
! y~
~1 . ' . . . . . ~,,..'~~.~s~a~•+ i SF.. r ~ ~
+ i y~,°t{ x'; a • n
. . - . ` . ~ . . ,r , . . ti.
- . j . i
. .
~
. i•;
. . Y \ . y ~ . ~ . ,
• ~ t _ . . f'~'•
J 1 +
~ ~ .
sl1L+ .-ti(~• \ ~ i . ~ 1 ~ ~ Y ~ ~.i~ y~ ' . - .
,
~ , ~
: r
+t,
. r%'."s . . r-. ~ ~ . ~ -E~~ v~ I.iy ~ "i'~ ~ ~,y. A ~ •
~ .
I 1 ~c I ~ - _ ` , a r J ~•.t ~ t -
ri,~" ~Cl:~~"~~
~
~ ~'4= " i ~ l • ~ ! ~~W. i . ~ ~ ~r~. . ~ ~ ~ . .
'".l - ~ ~ .r' .~w;~~ C _ .c',.~ •',c. t~•~r .i[~•`% ~ ~.~~.°;trF .^~..,-,~s, it k.Q:~.~ ~ . .
. , .
r ; ' 5r ~ C: ~ C v 1 ~ i' G ~ [ ; ~ ~ ` t'.
~r~~~~
~ , . ;
I i T ~ ~ . . . 1 ~yry R . ~1~ . , ~ . ~ ~ '1 . t t,
: ~ ~ ~ }~r~+t i ~ . . 'L+ •y-s~"~ia. ;t <~r~_ -Y^ i .y!~~ .
j •.y 'f~'-~.
3
..Y•
, r .•'1 ..r. . .'A s°. . ~ . ~ . .r. . ~ ~ . . .'~.x ..~,.3._ . ...._.:.ar.~_;vxF..:. . ~ruT~
• w . ` a • 0 ~
rlt~s"~
u .".`i~a.?rx ' - ~ s x~lr ~ .~`t,'•~ ' t S.~ ~ ~
a_~ ~ 3G' Ea'~'rtir. Y~._ ~ .!1 v~ . ~'C~~ t I 2• s~' i'
~ ~ r~,~. ~R ✓ . _.•J`'~ . f : r ' <-,~e _s._ , xi ~w1~ , ~ bs" `
, ~y "~}9N, 1.f .i i~.'.y~ FC.r,>.- ,y _k~ i }t, .r ~ .y _ _ . t d' ~''t ~.'uy,y~1' ,R. Y~ a asiJ .Jf: _A~'<"t~es9~'~-^ . ~ev. • .
1 ~4.: Jb_'~~ .~•'l.L. .11 .w, }4 'Mr~'i.: ti. '"Sx' - ~P ..~1~ ' - i~{kr~~1''.~. ~',i~ 's q.'ti :'43~„ ~Rf .:M1 .
v*±~:. ~ 72t`~ . .4~ 3°' y~.~. .~,°r^d t ~s~ - ~ la::` . : ♦ . ,
w'~ ~.a..~~± ~'L~~~ r f. . L-,yR~...~ "~tf"'~ T 7Y .~F„r.+x . u ~t ~ ~ ~.7~;-:~t'e*~fi~..`.~ ~+~4-~1~F~ •iF ~~~i~':,3
F~lxv.~+;;,
tl J ~ t i ~.1' c '•i •'.r l E ~ _ ~ } "1' ,i s:' h ~ ~:i ~
- c"?1 ~ ri ~ ~ E-. J ~l ~ ~ f n~ ~.1 ~ • k~G ~ , - a '~..1 ~l ~ 4~~ li ~ ! t `~i~1 Y~:~t~ : ~ ~ . 1 t . l ~~',i ' ~ ~I~V - :~r P;,, .
~r - • - ~ ~ . - I~ 1 I . J 1 F y .'7 ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ 3.~ i~
~ r• ~1~~ ..K, 1 l~ r ~r~~ q i[~f.v~~~ ,i[. ,~1 ~ , 1 . t_ or T~ ~k~t~. :2~ .
~ i i.i . . . . y i 7 j - ~!7 l ~ ~ 1~~ )1 ~ \ : ~ ~ E h ~ d '~i j
t,►~'~.
~ ~ ~ ~sl 'r ~lF ~ C.1~~~ f~ ~ ~ l~ ~^t f ~ \ ~ ~ 5 ~ I~ • ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i~ ,•ila~ 'F ~ E Y y` l ~ a h. ~ .i Y y.. ~ . . ,
" n.Y
-
r
t~~~
l;r~ !f~ ~~if~~ .~\Sf ,~1I~ (~I' ..I~7 1 I _ 71:1, : ~'C ~.Y .
'A
.
. . . . . - ~ ~i ~ . ~ . . ~ ~ . ~ ~ , , - - ' _ . . - . . . . . . . • a^; ~ , -
. . ~ ' . . - ~ . , ~ . ~ . . . . . . . . . , - • ' . ~ . ~ T . ~ , I
. . : , ; . . .
- - . ~ ~ : ~ ( _ _ ~ . . - . . ~ . . . . ~ _ . .
.
. , . , . , . _ .
i. ,
a
,
.
.
~
;
. . , , ' ~ i ' a
. . . . ~ . .'r . . . . . . _ . . . . . ~ . . ' . ' . . ~ . . . . . - ~ . _ ' . , .
~ . . . . . . - ~ - ' - . , . . . . ~ . : . z-~ . ~ - . ~ .
. ' ; . - . . . . . . ~ . . - .
. . . - ~ . ~ . ~ ~ . ~ . . ~
. . . . _ . ~ .
, . . . . . . . . . . . S ~,~1_; .
. . . . . - . . .
. . - ' , .
~ - .~s....~....~..,. . 4 . . . . . ~ . . ~ .
. . . . , . _ . . . _ . ~_~...._.:#~:..r ......s...a4 . .....i-,>:,- . . , , e
~
, , , , . - - -
~ -
~ 6
ImP " mienta''
1 the,
617,11
r ~ I~., {z~~t~~ hau. A . •n _.l>,,.r,ti ~~,.`~C ~'t. y - .c~'a ' c,y '-i. s ~S r . tk ; ~ X.wr'.~, ' , '~.w'fi, T~...~,~~,~FY~ ~s~ c , .
. s ?^~sry'~'~ ~r{.';~ tt Ft;7 ,'f.;t ..._a ~V~ . . - ~ . - ~ ~ _ , t -+t.`'~'`.~ .
_ ~~J,-J • ~•~.~1~ n : r 1 '"u~. ~A.~;n Cr ~ `.2.~'
. ~ '"+7~~_ ~ ,.'~lr ~ , 1~ ~,.'~,27,~.t~~ i
~
~
' ~ j ~ - ' ~ ,~y~ ~ -,..•s:i~ ~1 ~ ~ a k .Y'~ :r.~s~ .-i
~~F ,r' 1~- - d. .,y,t' - ~.i..., r''~~;;•r- (^il~.~~-- :ii.~~,,~_ v. - ~~~i'' ~1r,'~`s -~'r,:a ~ 4~~'~' w.~ .
~ . J ~~~J'~ ~I 1 . ' -~J -J'~ -J~J~T~ y ~~..~~~~1~ J~~~ I~-~J~ - ~fi.r►~+~~~/✓ ~'st Y- . f i ,,~~d ~ ~ .]3-~~, n F C Lo
r I j
i''` ..~~`~1~,~ I.~.E•~ ~ ~ ~ ' ls ~ .
~ Y
r
. _~c-~.• ~ . i . . . .
~ . . .i ~0~. ~ r1~!Z~' - 1 'M1' 1 l~ ~ P ,
~ ti'+~ N ',n ~ :r ~ _ 's3' . .r,.. ~r.'!~ y .,s; . ;.~~F~~~. . ~ 1 ~ x:~ f
'.Y _a l. K~~-_ ~,ti.s~fSr3~~ .Y r ~ - - ~ 1`` :t. t "l'~•~ J r ~..;N . e . A ~
/ y'i_..+- ll,~d { ~r"'+ r S l".~G~'~ ` ~i - ~l ~ ~?,44'. '-~y~ x~~~- .R -~a}Y~ -T~1t ~ar,ry4M
~ - ~ ~ ~S' ~ ; ~ ~1j, , v.~ +5 .
.J' J 1 J . - _ ~ c~ ~ ~ P Sr i r• } ~ . t ~
~ ' r-a i ~.v~..• ' Fe . 'z rr < < : 1 . ~ ~I ~ '•.I r . - ~+i . _ ,
1-4
' , ~ -J• ^~~t ~ - .j_- ' - .
~i~
■,1 ~ ~t4 . , ~.n.i Ty ~t. ~ .
- ~i+r s ~ i .t .~r ~ . ~ .s~~ .5. '.'~.t~f~' .,5._'1 ~S~r.•hpG. s o1r., d,K'%-:
~ ° ~c' i ~iFr4~ 'f ~ s ~ 1 q• a ,y . ~
T
. ..._r~. . . . . . ~ _ . _ .
. . _
, .
`4..- .
~
~-r~ , ° , ~ _ ~ ~
. , .
.
;
r.
• ~I-:u: ~ i • f ~ ~ ~ . : . . r. . . . , -M . . : • [••J~:-~ F.... ~ , R.. ~ r ~ ti _ r s t 'z' ~"`d 1' ' ~ , r , ~
~,y ~ " ~1:~' v~ .p. r •~/'y y, ~ ~~~j
` ~ i - ~~'•c~;~ •s~ a . . 1 n ~ - ~,t . . - ~,J ' ~'R'i" 7 }.t'~
Zr,
~a4~~
' y rr` - . j• 1 s ' „ t ~ 'F"~'~: J " ~ 'i,r "~~F~ ; i
f ~~1~~~ f'.f ?J r^_1~,~'~~~r -G
J
C, ~ . _ rti
r, ' : , - 1 _ ~ . r. ~ r ~r - .
% '15J~r~r~ `~~~>ric~~ ~~"rrr.~r~r~ _~r~~
~
J~jJ t~~~~( rJ
I
11r~`~
~
. ~ ,
5 3 ~ ~ ~ . i i ~ ~ t,~. _ . r ~ ~ f i „t 'y t[ s.+4 ' 'ty ..",,ti,t`" 4 i F ,;C c~~' ~ • ~~i ;~f{C~~~~~ ~1-=~~~~i ,
s . ?t.'F a ~F ~ p,~k.~ ,n'F y.4• ~T~ ~r r~ t t `
/~~J ~ p ~ ~ ~ ~ ;5;~~ %a~ ~ a~i ~ ~ " ,»~'r ~~.i~" a
~ i.;.. _r. 0 tl • ~Cs:i, .w ~!f3, :r,; ~ ~i r . ~ ts~'~~"'~ p.+. 'ti~ ~.t~ro ~ . W ,
5 ;L f1 r
e)
.
~ ~{-1'• F i^ ~ f ' ~ ti ~ (i ,v r j - O ~'~t ~ l.~~-r r> x f a...! . - , ~ v
~ a ,.~Y V,H,~'"~~~ ~i~ ' h ,.a:. ~ _ I"'~.~'~~ ~ti ~t•.: ,Y'.~r~ 7 rF _:1 4 EI t T ~.,r~ ~ i:'%.i~ ~r~ ~ .,d.i-.~ ~ lS.'VC%<
~'~i'i'~'~, G/-e
R',~-.tf; : ~
7(:s}i,~.. ~?iY' ~ a• ;f~~~";~,~, ' . .
. .
. ,
~ .c, F~ Y..''r ~+C, a~'h{. e7'i ~~_.u~ `T'ti2~ e1 _R\f-„-~ -~a :~5•. i~~~d. ~r _dr _ _'~.'r.. ';S~ ~•~T_a,. 3~~~ 4 ~f,:;F~,t
=.4r.~r ~z~ ....'~'i i` .r ~~Y::~r }"t"•'. v~i ,La3;~~ r r'.'r
.
, ~ ~sy5 .vG-- o~~ ..~,,~!°1;.~C~ t 41. '~'!tR i ~'~-.•~-~~v ?rr k ~d.~r ~~Ft .f~~`A~'{~'F~;'a'~ +41~.Y~
. . ~ ~
, ~ _ _
. . , .
.
(.`~f. y„ ' •~y _ . - . .
. . . . . . . ~ I ~
. ' ' ~ ~ . a: : . ~s ,i.:'' _ , - _ .':1.. - - •1.
l
~
~ ~ ~ ■
.
,
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~►:~~i~~ ~
4f
'
. ~ . i
. - . . . . ~
' ' . , , , . . i ~ ~ _ . . . . . i
I
.
~
~:,~~r~~• ~ O ~ ~ r ~ .
j,, .~.y Yr.'i. ~ t :••!ii .,1~ i. ~ ~e~1' r Vr ` ~+-Y,~,~ t ~y ~ ~ ~ c .
Wr
r _ Y e ~ 2~ '1I ~ '.r : .:f. C?q1 iL'~ y ..~.`S~, go . ,Y~ ft' =~2.F ~~~`~.t , ~-!'d `jV.- ~ ~~i ~ ~ t •~a2, ~ X .~'7i~''°h° -::K .
~j ~ ~ r. ~ ~ ~ • • K • n' f ~ ' ~ . l~ 1 ~ C9r ~~I' ~ t ~l' r:~ ° A> „ ~,Y~~ `~n-~ ° ~ ~
.
~ " ~~•s ~t, ~ , r . ~'t, r ~ n~ ~-$s' ..S ~~~i ~a. } r af; if
x`l
.
~:t.~.b~ k'~'e • :'i-,~- T ~ tir i ~~s r .4p.a`.!.:;~. ~ Iii~7:~ r. ~1~ ~Y~~._.+F-' 'F `Cr , y~ ~t' ~i~
, .
t ttP• n~ ~ r z
.
f i f Sc r M f~.- T . , „ ..a31. ~ ~~,tis~ _ ti ~ 7 ; ~~'y~; 1 , @ S 3 0: •%i~ - t
~t, ) j~
"Q ' " - ~ ~ e: ~ir ~ t ' c l ~ l<1 r,+~1 ~..~';i;a ~ ~1 ~ •oi ~ 1 r ~ k''`' I ~ ( I~~'~~! ~~,~i? ! ^4 ( ~ C
~ i~r~~ ~ ,M1-, ~r i a '~J~ - 3,/:r~'r'g ...p: - ''l' _j ` . . '+,.q _ j. •l~F .1r"'c` } '~;,(j.~ ~
1 . ~`.`F,,~.~ - ? , -~l. i..,k. .~r~~~Y~ u;-- z JSt.. i ~S~y l~:i~= ~-"z,S~~Y•y~x
nv.,`vy. :;k -,r•~J`g y- , .
a.: a ~ , ; 4 ~ I- e.~E'• ° ! 'h r};~i:'✓t..c:-~.; ~S !F!^'~`~t. y~-~",-~af: ,:stt~;°~~gX ;L'., '~`k ,f""~
~;x .1 ial~ ,•~..`1i ~"~I,I f,~. J[. '1: 1 i~-, ~E. ~_.y jC (^n AS;-~ ~ 1~~~ ~.,ti rn~ ,r _~~.,EJ;'1~;~r ~o.d!. .~i.~4iati
. ,
~ ~ i ~a~~~~ff ~j~ !I: ~ E < r~ ~I '~1f ~ r 7 J~ ; . ~ ~
:
. ~ . 4
<
. .
, . . . . . . . . . , . i _ _ . _
~ I / ~ . ; c ~ ~ ~ s ~ ~ .
.
~ f w ~ r ~ ~ ~ '3~~ • . . 1.'Y ' i r ..i i r~ ~ t j,~ I~' ~ - .
,
¢ , . _ . . . _ ~ ; . ~
,
~~I
,
, . ,
,
~
.y, i ~ w ~ _ ~t; •
1"`
. . . . - . ~ . _ E ~ N 4 E~ 1, ~ ~ 1 •1 ~ . ~
: 1 J -1...'•. , . t.:l . , . . _ t~i~ - .
' I I r ' Ir ~i ~ ~J J ` a~i ~ F„ . e~1• ~ F.S.:., ~.1;~:~ ~ a` t ` a ~t'vd1 r A ,y i.
Ei
...t~ M~ , _ , . ~ • . - - `~'vIF ~ ~ s,~`~J~~ . ~4,. ~UF `~.~n~ ~ > ~ i..T . . .
;b^~ . • i ~ r,"~`crx .cr~t".+. t t ~ ~Y•'~t.°y,s ~ay9t'.
~~;~i~¢ ~f k. ' 1j ~ I E_r.- t ~ _ ,5~ . Ai ~.c.. ...yi ..:Sa~-_C.'' ~+.,1•~ i-.~ ' !f - . .
~ ~'f'~., a 'j:": _ ~T .-:2 1 - ~,ti. ~3 r t fiyi~:"r. ~ 7"~",ci,-~~ "'6~,;c'~*'r-~'~c~ F r~ 'a- ♦ .i~,, .
~ ~~n { r Z - t::. _ - ~ S' ~'~"L ' J t~~: +~r,'~;{>. ~a ~..-:y T~ .-i~~ . ~i„~~'r~w-k~'~? ~ ~
IF-
~ u~., . u.~...n i_....~~... . ~ . _....a.. L~...a...~... ` _""..<<r..~»•~..~~,~atiw.,~r~a.:.1~.~~:~y. " ~cr..:Yf'RaY.w .~.1'G+r.3~.:.~~~.i . ~ .
~ ~ ~ ~ . J
_ ~ . , _ . .
.
.
_ ~ ~ ~ _ x~ -Q~ ~ _ ~ ~--•j : L.I'-- ,.:y ~ ~ _ - ~
e.
,
. T ~ . ~ ~ . ~ . . , . ~..J'; `~~.'1 ~ ~I~ ~ z~'~~~ . . . •
. ~ . ~ - . .
; ~ . . . . . ' a~ . , . , _ . _ . ~ _ .
~ . . _
. . _ ~ ~.n ~ k+. - L~ , re.-' i y~ - y.. r.- ,~~r ` ~ - ~ y,:,_• +
.R.! es~ -3 R;~,:~1~+~~ 7~:`~1'v~.~Y i~r•/..i , t - ~ ~..a F ~v ys ~ti'_ ~ ..t.t ; : ~ y ~t . .
, Q ~ , ~ ~~'j~"~~, , s~.; • ~y, _ s;,._ ,`l. ;v ~r~ rr ` , , . ,
- . . . .
.r
. .
. .
. . . ~ . ~ . ~ ~ ~ . .
. . ~ f" -.s,l c f ~ . Sa ~ . t~ _ . . , ,
k J~ ,y~ w c•. ~G`-. Y. ~ .
'tiyi' 1 1 . ~ ~+ry<, t~ ~ t 'DS . ..',y2 ~.7•!1 ..k , ,f ~ ~?t`✓'~
. ~l' YS. 77•. ' . . . . , . . ~
~
. ,..w .y.. . i =1 • , 3. , . " ~ r'r ~ i as ~ '~`'v 1~ .
' r-~A ~ ~ y ~?~~r . f. ..yy/'~ Y ) ~ 1}T. l- • h,p~.,+~,,~, p~ ~F
RW-7`Vf•_~7!~9~y,~r T:1 ,t. ~:~.,„tk"~~`'l1=+Rt .r. A~.i~.~ ..r~i ~yv`a`~,r_. .-,~t.'.F.~i ~i~ c~y_ti,~_~ /%1►~'. ~i
. , v . i .
s,F~i''.:
f ? . ; ~i I l;_i---1. ~ Is - G ~"-Jr" ~ ` e ~ " C. tl ~t ~ ~ ~v ~ ~ ~ • 1 . ~ ~ h .
r~ q
54'
,r ;,t~ , • ~
2'f
~ t jr. Av
1'~"ti.~
~ ~)1.~~~
-~.J .J .-+~,±.1 ..r..i ' ~ ~ a~ ,
~
F ~ _ •L~ ~ ~.~-~~1~'~~'l CJ~.'J .J~.;!J ,.~.1.Ji~ 1~~.~~ . ~ . . . 'J~~~.~!~.~J~~4•-J~QJ~.1 iY~,~.e1~Jl.[~~~.J1~~~y~~ ~~,'~,~2~,4 . .
fTl~r~~~~~,
i. ~v t* ` _ v~'~"RF'y.` 1 IJ' yti~ - ~ t'„ ,y,• a ~ ti~ . ~,.~r -3' ~
~ i . ~ ~ rf 1 ~ ~ r ~ • ~ -
TO! ~ . . .
r ' .
. ~~t . ~ . ~~~J~~t~.J,I~I~'~~~~ J ..J _J ~ _ . ~'1~'~~~i~~~~~,.'~t~~ ~ f~~ W40
~
. . ~ - . . . . . . ~ . . , . . . , ~ . J ~ , ~ ~~F~ . . Y`
~
. ' I . I . ~ . • . . . I
_ ~f-~'~J1'~"r1•~~~1 r s~.~
~ ~,~1• t_~ i 1 ~ ~ . . .I~:f 1. ' ~ ~ _ ~f.ry ' . .
r~y 4 -rs ,yr,. Y~~~yy.s,~t`r.~^l.'.` '''t ,~•_T ~ r'!g Y. ...+y..,.R" ~ u4r --,c"M ~ x ~ ~ t . •
Pi
•
_ I
_ _ _ J
. ! l ~ ~ ~ • ~
. { ~ • • • 1 '
1 . • ~ : ~ :
= • _ l ~ • ~ I • • : ~ ~ '
lr ~ ~
'f -
~
♦ ~ ~ ' ~ 1
i
~ ' ~ ~ q~ • ~ r ~ ~ a'1 ' T- ti • 4~ ~ ss'~Y!`~ t n D ~ p
R' 1 7 ~ J' ~i"!i'. ~y f: Y y ' ~ ::Y~'',K 4 F=i., ~ F, . ♦ t~t ~ '
~ .
h., y
T t s~d'' ~'IT`~}~~ y~ 1 14`• ~ N ~ 'r Y ~N ~ q 1
a
> i ~ j ~ p y~y &0 . * - 3~: . . . _ .
~ ~1~: 1 ~~1ir 1ti i,'~.~~~0~~ YF ti ti r~P~~~~J' y C _ ~~t ` ~ ,~'1s i'`"t~.~ ~ r . .•y. ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
.#j~',tx~ ~4v'~.~M ~~:s^ ~•r. .Y T1 -y - ('~!sN ?a.~~t~ ~ ~ . ,
~.'t~. -~.'rr ~1F c.~±~ .'tr~_ . ~ . r' ~-16.~~'~~ ?;~i , ..f i;., ~~Y~~~A![•J;..;- ::'.i!-~2"Yt ~ . . ~ ~ . . '
v~*
r ~ `.Y- ,191r ~~~.~_tr ~~~y~v~,~t-~a.~` ~ ~ r d~. 'l' .'1. s(. ~ . . . _
i
~,ib
~?~'f ~ ~ y 11,'r .rf~?~'~~~.~ .yl r~~~~''A~~- ~4.y,' a ~ • r ~ ~'1 ~ ~ Of~ i ; _ _ . . _
r ~ t. S~r~+ i. ~y~? G~, pti r"~u n -s-• ~
~ °;.r,- - . r k ~a•.?,~ c ~ ~v•; y ~ ~ ~h•w "C#'r '~t.Y,`~ ~ `1~ ~"rj ~ , ~ ~•o . . .
~ ~.w
Ii 1~ ~.~c~
4►
' i. . , . - ~ .
.
~
. , ~ .
. , . . ~ . ~ .
, - . . , . . - _ . . . :I:` . . _ . . ~ . .
, `
. . . , . . . ~ . J .4 r' . . . . . i . . _ , . .
_ . . . ` . . ' . . . , i
~ ~ ~Ltr~ ~ . 't' ~~•.1~, r \ ~ ' ~`j ~"C~} tF~ ~,d ~ -.lY ~ ~ r v"r.~~'~ ! 4 ~iJ b~ ~ ~ . . .
r. ~ r n~t✓ e ~ F J.. ' Y
. . ~ 't ~tz Y ^ r` ~'K + r.? 2.f, ' _
i , , . . ry ~ ~ . r ` ~ ~,~,}r ~~•~i ~ i. ~I~~i~ . .f"1r~!
~ ~
. . . . ~ . . ' ' L~ i 1 / ~ , ' . - . .
. . ye..i.-. - .-a..~ . ~ ~ . ~ ' . I
. . . . . . _ _ . . . . . ~ . . . i . r .,.t:~~ . . . _ _ . . . 1
. . - ~ . . . : - . . , - . . - . • ~ r - " ' - "
i
.y
~r
i~
~
ri !1:
_ 1. , f° r'i ~ . ~'.I f5 . ~ r' T~ ~ :'i , ~ n .i _ . . - _ .
f ~
t iCITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
RESOLUTION NO 03-024
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY,
WASHINGT4N STATING ITS IlVTENT TO ENTER INTO AN INTERLOCAL
AGREEMENT FOR THE REGIONAL SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT
SYSTEM. _
WHEREAS, to protect the public health and safety, it is necessary for the City to
provide for the management of solid waste;
WHEREAS, on November 3, 1987, the City of Spokane, other cities and Spokane
County established a cooperative project for the management, handling and disposal of
solid waste generated within the incorporated and unincorporated areas of Spokane
County through an Interlocal Cooperation Agreement;
WHEREAS, Spokane County has adopted a Comprehensive Solid Waste
Management Plan for the region including revisions set forth in Spokane County
Resolution No. 98.0602 that was applicable to the area within the City of Spokane Va11ey
prior to March 31, 2003; and
WHEREAS, the City is desirous of continuing the present Solid Waste
Management System and becoming a pazty to the Interlocal Agreement relating to the
Regional Solid Waste Management System.
NOW, TBEREFORE, be it Resolved by the City Council of the City of Spokane
Valley, Spokane County, Washington, as follows:
1. The City Council expresses its intent on behalf of the City to enter inta
the "Interlocal Agreement between the City of Sgokane, Spokane
County and the City of Spokane Valley Re: Spokane Regional Solid
Waste Management System" for the purpose of providing for the
management, handling and disposal of solid waste within the City.
Staff is directed to to
and
will work cooperatively with the County and other cities to prepare a
plan for solid waste mattagement which may be a part of the Spokane
County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan.
~ 2. Further, City staff shal ' to the Council.the City's
responsibility with respect to th
~ ncluding matters which must be
presented to Washington State Regulatory Authorities such as the
WUTC. Staff shall further develop ordinances to regulate the flow and
5:1AuolucionsUtrso"w 03-021.fAtent-loGd wvtadx 1
r ~
c~;ntrol ut,ulid wastc ;iiia do all tlwigs ucccssary to pro~:ikic lur tii~
public health and safety of the residents and inhabitants of the City.
-4L.
Aclupted this - `'day ot llarch, ZUIi
City of Spukane Vallcy
~"WV l 1
Mayor Michael DeVle ng
ATTEST:
,71-/ 1 1~' 'ZI
Cv-
Interim 'ty Clerk, Ruth Muller
Approved as to Form:
e' City m,, Stanley 4. Schwartz
. S:`Res~lulanilHtailu[iun ~)-U:J,intrnc-tc:.d ~a>:a.Joo ~
G
. . ~
Retu rn :
S9 okane City Clerk's Office
5 FIoor, 808 W. Spokane Falls Blvd
Spokane, WA 99201
rg6 03 OS 06 430{an
Fiie no.anaa3•5Jz
File noO ";66
Sv File no. C03-038
Approved 5-27-2003
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT (CH. 39.34 RCVJ) BETWEEN THE CTTY QF
SPOKANE, SPOKANE COUNCY AND THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
RE: SPOKANE REGIONAL SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
RECITALS
WHEREAS, the City of Spokane, a first class charter city duly organized and
existing uader and by virtue of the laws of the State of Washington (the "City'), and the
County of Spokane, a class A county duly organized and existing under and by virtue of
the laws of the State of Washington (the "County"), have specific powers and statutory
duties relating to planning and controlling the mamagement, handling and disposai of
soIid waste ("solid waste management') within the City and unincorporated area of the
County (the "region'% respectively, including the development of a Solid Waste
Management Plan under RCW 70.95; 1
_ VVHEREAS, the City of Spokane Valley, WA, (hereinaftcr "Signatory Rcgional
City"), a non charter optional code city duly organi2ed and existing under and by virtue
of the constitution and laws of the State of Washington, likewise has specific municipal
statutory powers and duties relative to solid waste management within its jurisdiction;
and
WHEREAS, the County duly adopted a Spokane County Comprehensive Solid
Waste Management Plan for the region ("Plan") on Ju1y 21, 1998, including revisions in
, . ~ Spokane Vallcy Agreeitieat to Join Regioaal Solid V4'astc System as Regionai City,
pledging all solid waste to System
Page 2
Spokane County Resolution No. 98-0602; and
VVHEREAS, the City and County initiatcd the Spokane Regional Solid Waste
DispQsal Project in 1984 in order to develop a necessary solid waste management system
and plan, including appropriate waste reduction and recycling provisions and litter
control provisions; and
WHEREAS, after years of planziing and ttic completion of an adequate
environmental impact statement and vendor selection process, and after due consideration
af the environmental, social, technical, economic and other relevant factors, including
public and governmental comment, and observation of applicable federal, state, and local
procedures, the City and County established a cooperative project for the management,
handling and disposal of solid waste generated within the City and the unincorporated
areas of the County by execution of an Interlocal Cooperation Agreement by a joint
Resolution adopted on November 3, 1987, as superseded by an Interlocal Cooperation
Agreement adopted by the City and County on October 10, 1988, as superseded by
Amended and Restated Interlocal Cooperation Agreement between the City of Spokane
and Spokane County, WA on April 10, 1989 (hereinafter collectively referred to as the
"County Interlocal Cooperation AgreemenY'); and
WHEREAS, the County, by the County Interlocal Cooperation Agreement has
agreed to exercise its police and contract powers, and designate the System as the site for
disposal of solid waste collected within the unincorporated area of the County by its Flow
Control Ordinance, subject to the exceptions set forth therein; and
WHEREAS, Signatory Regional City now desires, in consideration for the City
handling the disposal of Solid Waste at the System, to agree to exercise its police powers
to desigiiate the System as the sole site for disposal of Solid Waste under its control;
NOW THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED:
Secrion 1: DEFINITIONS.
As used in this Agreement, the following words shall have thc following
meanings, unless the context dictates otherwisc:
A. Annual Budeet shall mean the System budget for a Fiscal Ycar, as adupted
or amendeci by the City ui accordatice with Sectiou 8.12 of thc Bond
Ordinance.
B. Rond Ordin:incc means Orclinancc C-292I85, adoptccl January 9, 19,39 b_y
the City of Spoka.ne City Couucil.
I i.
Spokane Valley Agreement to Join Regional So[id Waste System as Regional City,
piedging aIl solid waste to System
Page 3
C. CLty shall mean the City of Spokane, Washington, a first class charter city
of the State of VVashington.
D. Countv shall mean Spokane County, Washington, a class A county of the
State of Washington. -
E. Countv Interlocal Coo4eration Aereement shall mean the above
referenced County Interlocal Cooperation Agreement betwaen the City
and the County for the ownership, financing and management af the
system and any amendments thereof.
F. Disoosal Site means a site or sites appmved by the Board of County
Commissioners for Spokane County or the Boazd's Authorized Designee,
where any final treabment, utilization, processing, or deposidon of Solid
Waste OCCUTS. ThiS includes, but is not limited to, transfer stations
(included as part of the disposal system of the County), sanitary landfills,
incinerators, composting plants, and the location of a Facility for the
recovery of energy resources &om Solid Waste or the conversion of the energy &om such wastes to more useful forms or combinations thereof.
G. Facility shall mean the mass bum resource recovery steam and electric
generating facility constructed pursuant to the Construction Conttact;
such facility is the "Facility" as such term is defined in the Construction
Contract.
H. Hazardous Waste shall mean waste which, by reason of its composition or
characteristics is a toxic substance or hazardous waste as defined in the
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCR.A), 42 USC 6901 et esq.,
together with its implementing regulations, or in the Toxic Substances
Control Act (TOSCA), 15 USC 2601 et seq., together with its
implementing regulations, or the definitions as gromulgated by the State
of Washington as Dangerous Waste or Extremely Hazardous Waste, all as
may be now or hereafter amended from time to time.
I. Recvclable Materials shall mean those materials, other than Recovered
Materials which are separated from Solid Waste, either by the generator at
the source of such Solid Waste or mechanically by the System at any
lawfully authorized transfer station, recycling facility, or other permitted
locatian, as the case may be, and which are capable of being retumed to
the economic mainstream by the System. Recyclable Materiats may
include, but shali not be limited to, bottles, aluminum cans, newspapers,
cazdboard, paper materials, or other specific commercially marketable
items, where and only where such materials have been specifically sorted
Spokaae Valley Agreement to Join Regional Solid Waste System as Regional City,
pledging all solid waste to System '
Page 4
by the generator prior to coIlection and are collected apart &om the
common municipal solid waste stream for commercial manufacture or
recycling.
J. Rezional Cities shall mean all incorporated cities and towns in Spokane
County, includ.ing Signatory Regional City, except the City of Sgokane,
which have entered into, or hereafter enter into a Regional City Interlocal
Agreement.
K Scale Svstem means the scales, scale house, computer hazdware and
software and associated equipment necessary to operate an automated
ticketing system.
L. Simiatorv Reeional Citv means the City of Spokane Valley, WA.
M. Solid Waste includes garbage and refuse and shall mean all putrecible and
non-putrecible wastes, whether in solid or in liquid form except liquid-
carried indush-ia1 wastes and sewage. "Solid Waste" includes garbage,
rubbish, ashes, industrial wastes, swill, demolition and construction wastes,
abandoned vehicles or parts thereof, discarded home and industz-ial
appliances, manure, digested sludge, and vegetable or animal solid and
semi-solid materials. Solid Waste does not include Recyclable Materiats
or Hazardous Waste. In addition, all materials deposited in cans or
containers for collection, (other than Recyclable materials or HaZardous
Waste), shall be deemed Solid VVaste.
N. System shall mean the exisring Spokane Regional Solid Waste
Management System comprised of all property, real or personal, tangible,
or intangible that is now owned or hereafter acquired by the City which is
used or useful by the City (i) in connection with the collection and
disposal of Solid Waste generated within the City's boundaries and (u) in
connection with the disposal of Solid Waste generated and collected
elsewhere and delivered to the System for disposal. As of the date hereof,
the System includes, without limitation, the City's Northside Landfill, the
City's refuse collection system, and all facilities and equipment
appurtenant thereto, whether real or personal, and vehicles necessary and
incident thereto.
0. Tippine Fee means the amount charged per ton of Solid Waste for disposal
by the System.
All other capitalized terms used herein, which aze not defined, shall have the
meanings given to them in the Bond Ordinance. Otherwise they shall have the same
• • . ( ( .
Spokaae Valley Agreement to Join Regional Solid Waste System as RegionaI City,
pledging all solid waste to System
Page 5
meaning as vsed in other documents referenced in this agreement unless another specific
document is referenced.
Secrion 2: PURPQSE.
The ose of this A eetnent is to establish the artici ation of Si~ato I
PwP P P rY
Regional City in the System as one of the Regional Cities.
Secfion 3: SOLID WASTE DIRECTED TO SYSTEM. I
A. Signatory Regional City hereby covenants, agrees and contracts to
exercise its police and contractual powers and authority as may now or
hereafter be recognized in contract or at law to direct the deposit of Solid
Waste generated within its geographical boundaries to the System.
B. The following are specificalIy exempted from the provisions of subsection
A:
1). Wrecking automobiles and parts thereof incIuding storage and
handling facilities, minor reclamadon of scrap metal, glass,
discarded clothing, paper, and their associated facilities which
leads to resale or reuse of said material where no chazge is made
for c411ecdon or disposal to the originator.
2). Depositing soil, rock, tree shunps, gravel, broken concrete, broken
asphalt, and similar inert wastes onto the surface of the ground
whereby such depositing is to be temporary in nature, graded, and
otherwise worked to fill an existing depression or low arca of
ground.
3). Depositing agricultwal Solid Waste onto or under the surface of
the ground when said waste is being utilized primariIy for fertilized
or a soil conditioner, or is being deposited on ground owned or
leased by khe person responsible for the production of said'waste as
long as depositing such waste does not create a nuisance.
4). Depositing sewage and/or sludge onto or under the surface of the
ground at a Disposal Site t,hat has otherwise been issued a Permit
by a local, state or federal agency to be operated, maintained or
managed for that purpose.
S). Depositing Hazardous Wastes or Dangerous Wastes onto or under
the surface ofthe ground at a Disposal Site that has othervvise been
~
Spokane Valley Agreement to Join RegiQnal Solid Waste System as Regional City,
pledging ail solid waste to System
Page 6
issued a Permit by a local, state or federal agency consistent with
the Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan to be operated,
maintained, or managed for this purpose.
b). Establishment and operation of a Woodwaste Landfill site;
"Woodwaste Landfill" being defined in the Spokane County Flow
Control Ordinance, No. 85-0395, section 2 II, adogted May 14,
1985.
C. The Spokane Couuty Comprehensive Solid Waste Management
Plan wiIl address disposal of all types of waste. The City and
County will include Signatory Regional City in planning for and
opportunities for proper disposal of exempt waste.
Section 4: ADMIlVISTRATION.
A. Precise oreanization of entitv. The entity defined above as the
S}►stem has already been created. Signatory Regional City joins
tbis System by this agreement. The City will manage the System
pursuant to the terms and conditions of the County Interlocal
Cooperation Agreement.
B. The City will provide Signatory Regional City with a copy of the
Annual Budget for the System.
C. Although the City is the administrator of the System, a Policy
Liaison Board has been established by the County Interlocal
Cooperation Agreement. The Liaison Boazd already consists of
two delegates from the City of Spokane, two from the Countyand
one from the Regional Cities. With respect to Signatory Regional
City however, it the intent of the parties that this Signatory
Regional City (Spokane Valley) be endtled to its own separate
vohng seat on the Liaison Boazd, to be created as an additional
sixth seat. Each party stipulates to andlor agrees -to seek
amendment of any other applicable interlocal agreements as may
be necessary to accomplish this intention.
D. Holdine, disoosiniz real, nersonal ro ertx Any real or personal
property needed for System operations may be acquired, held and
disposed of by the City, as adnainistrator under this agreement. The
City administers all special funds for System operations.
Section S: TIPPING FEES.
. . t(
Spokane Valley Agreement to Join Regional So[id Waste System as Regivnal City,
pledging all solid waste to System
Page 7
A. The Tipping Fees charged for disposal of Solid Waste at the
System shall be that established by the City. Tipping Fees shall be
uniform for the same class of service, except that Tipping Fees at
the System's trransfer stations and the Facility may differ to reflect
the costs of transporting Solid Waste from the transfer stations to
the Facility. The City has included and shall continue to include in
the Tipping Fee a"landfiIl closure component" which will be
alIocated between the City, the County, and the Regional Cities as
provided herein and in the County Interlocal Cooperation
Agreement.
B. If the Signatory Regional City is detennined to have liability under
Initiative 97 (RCW. 70.105D) or the Comgrehensive
Environmental Response Compensation, and Liability Act
(CERCL.A) in connection with any landfill, the System shall
allocate to Signatory Regional City a portion of the revenues from
the landfill closure component of the System's Tipping Fees. Such
allocation of revenues shall be in the sazne proportion that
5ignatory Regional City's Solid Waste generated and delivered to
the System bears to the total non-City [from sources other than the
Ciry of SpokaneJ Solid Waste generated from all other areas of
Spokane County and delivered to the Syscem each year. The
portion of such non-City Solid Waste delivered to the System by
the Signatory Regional City shall be determined by the population
of the Signatory Regional City compared to the total non-City
population [people living outside the City of Spokane in all other
areas of Spokane CountyJ or by such othcr mcchanism as may be
mutuaIly agreed upon by the City, the County and the Signatory
Regional Ciry.
C. The landfili closure component of the Tipping Fee will be
inereased or decreased periodieally as deemed necessary by the
City to generate the aznount af funds required by the Counry or
Regional Cities for landfill closure purposes within the limitations
set forth in the County Interlocal Cooperation Agreement.
D. Allocation of the revenues from the landfill closure component of
the Tipping Fee will be made manthly to reflect the actual
proportions based upan weight of Solid Waste delivered or caused
to be delivered to the System each year by the City, County, and
Regional Cities. The determination of the total weight of Solid
Waste delivered or caused to be delivered to the system by the
. . , i i
5pokane Valley Agreement to Joiu Regional Solid Waste System as Regional City,
pledging all soiid waste to System
Page 8
City, the County, and Regional Cities, shall be made ttzc-ough the
use of Scale Systems or, at any Disposal Site where Scale Systems
are not available, by converting volumes of Solid Waste to tons of
Solid Waste at the agreed upon ranges of 3 1l3 cubic yards of
compacted Solid Waste to one ton of Solid Waste and 6 2/3 cubic
yards of non-compacted Solid Waste to one ton of Solid Waste.
The detemnination of whether any particular Solid Waste delivered
to a disposal site by any person is &om the City or from other azeas
of the County shall be determined by the City tlu-ough such
inethods or systems as the City and the County shall agree and ~
deem appropriate.
E. Revenue allocated to Signatory Regional City if any shall be
remitted quarterly. Allocable revenues, including interest earnings
thereon, may be used for the following purposes: I
1). To pay landfill closure costs.
2). To fund a reserve for future landfill costs.
3}. To pay other collection costs. I
4). Any other landfill purpose.
Section 6: LJTILTTY TAX.
If the City, County or Signatory Regional City should impose a utiliry tax on the
disposal of Solid Waste at the System, the proceeds of that utility tax on disposal of Solid
Waste generated withi.n the County, either from incorporafed or unincorporated azeas,
shall be shared, after the deduction of all appropriate and reasonable administrative costs,
between the City, the County and the Regional Cities proportionately based upon the tons
of Solid Waste delivered to the System from the City, the Regional Cities, and the tons of
Solid Waste delivered to the System from other sources. The allocation of the tax will be
pursuant to the method specified in Section SB of this Agreement.
Section 7: UPDATE OF TI-IE COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE SOLID
WASTE NLANAGEMENT PLAN.
Pursuant to RCW 70.95.080, Signatory Regional City hereby authorizcs the
County, acting independentIy or through its agents or consultants, to prepare a plan for -
Signatory Regional City solid waste management as a part of the revisions to the Spokane
County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan Update in 1989 and every five (5)
years thereafter, including preparation of a Local Hazardous Waste Plan, a Recycling
f i ~
Spokaue Valley Agreement to J'oin RegionaI Solid Waste System as Regional Ciiy,
pledging all solid waste to System
Page 9
Plan and any environmental documents required therefore. The County will provide
drafts of the update and notify Signatory Regional City of ineetings regarding the update.
The Plan and any updates will be submitted to Signatory Regional City for their approval.
Section 8: AMENDMENT.
Amendment of this Agreement may be made only by written agreement of the
parties.
Section 9: DURATION AND TERMNATION.
A This Agreement shall be for an initial terrn of 8 yeazs or for such
longer term as any Bonds or Addifional Bonds remain Outstanding.
B This Agreement can be terminated eazly only by written agreement of
the City of Spokane, Spokane County, and the Signatory Regional
City. Upon termination of the Agreement, the City shall own the I
System and all of its assets. [cross reference, County Interlocal
Cooperation Agreement, Sec. 5.2 e].
Secdon 10: HEADINGS.
The section headings in this Agreement have been inserted solely for the purpose
of convenience and ready reference. In no way do they purport to, and shall not be
deemed to, limit or extend the scope or intent of the sections to which they apply.
Secdon 11: ADDTI'IONAL.
This Agreement contains all of the terms and conditions agreed upon by the
parties. No other understandings, orat or otherwise, regazding the subject matter of this
Agreement shall be deemed to exist or to bind any of the parties hereto. The parties have
read aad understand all of this Agreement, and now state that no representation, promise,
or agreemcnt not expressed in this Agreement has been made to induce the parties to
execute the sarne. Failure to enforce any term or condition in any one instance-shalt not
be deemed waiver in other instance. This Agreement shall not be construed to favor any
Part3'•
Section 12: FILING OF THE AGREEMENT.
The City of Spokane and Signatory Reg-ionaI City shall file this Agz-eement with
the respective City Clerlcs and the City shall file this Agreement with the Spokane County
Auditor and Secretary of State.
. , . . i ~
Spokane Valley Agreement to Join Regional Sotid Waste System as Regional City,
pledging all solid waste to System
Page 12
DATED this day of 2003.
City of Spokane Valley, WA
Signatory Re,gional City
By.
City anager
Attest:
~
City Clerk
Approved as to form:
VA."o-m
(
. ~
Spokane Valley Agreement to Join RegionaI SoIid Waste System as Regional City,
ptedging all solid waste to System
Page 11
ADOpTED by th Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington this
day of , 2043•
o~ cok4ffs
°~ECOO Jo oskelley, ChQir
. a ,
'
AT"I`EST: ' • . srAL:. •
VICKY M. DALTO p D. S.
-cz.E F THE ao ~
By:
~ ~aniela Erickson, Deputy M. Kate Mc lin, Commissioner
ATTPST: APPROVED:
D'ela Erickson F cine Boxer /
lerk of the Bo C ief Executive Offic~r
Approved as to Form:
J es P mciot,
ivil uProsecuting Attorney
. . . i ( ,
Spokane Valley Agreement to Join RegionaI Solid Waste System as Regional City,
pledging all solid waste to Systern
Page 14
Section 13: SEVERABILITY.
In the event any provision of this Agreement shall be declared by a court of
competent jurisdiction to be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable, the validity, legality and
enforceability of the remaining provisions shall not, in any way, be affected or impaired
thereby.
Section 14: EFFF..CI'IVE DATE.
This Agreement shall become effective immediately after it is duly adopted by the
Board of Spokaue County Commissioners, and the Councils of the Cities of Spokane and
the Signatory Regional City.
IN VVPTNESS VITHEREOF each of the parties have executed this Agreement by their duly
authorized offcials.
DATED this day of 2003.
U
CITY OF SPOKANE
B y: ~
4ac 70r
trat or
ATTEST:
/ F SP0
Terri Pfister '
City Clerk
Approved as to Form:
SHING~~
Robert Beau '
Assistant City Attorney
f
' j REC ( 7~{}
• • - . ~ IVEU°~ ~fh 20~0~2
~
AGENDA SHEET FOR COUNGIL MEETING OF; .1UN 05 2003
Submittinp Dept. Contact Person Phoneqgy P LERK'S OpFrGE
Solld Waste Dennis Hein 625 7806 OKqjvE, yUA
JNISTRATNE SESSIOA lE6lSLATIYF SESSI011 CffY PRfOR[ilr /~~n
d-act o Emergency Ord o CommunipGons CLERK'S FlLE UT'!~ 2M) 'c;) g
o Report o Resduqon o Economlc Devetopment RENEWS
o(laims o Final Readfng Ord o Growlfi Management CROSS REF
o First Reading Ord o Human Services ENG
STANDING COMMJTTEES o Special Consfderation o Neigh6orhoods BID
{Oate of Notification} o Heaqnq o Publtc Safety EqUISITIQN ,
o Fnance o PuD(ic Safety X Quality Servioe qellvery ighborhoodlCommissioNCommittee Notified:
o Naiphbprhopds o Rtic Worfcs o Racial Equity/Culhiral Diverslly
o PtanninqJCommunily 3 Eoan Dev , o Rebuild/lulafntain infrastructure Action Taken:
A6ENDA Interlocal Agreement (Ch. 39.34) between the City of Spokane, Spokane County and the City of
IIVORDlNC' Spokane Valley re: Reglonal Solid Waste Management System
6ACII6RO,ND: Wfth the incorporation of the City of Spokane Valley, it is necessary to enter into a separate
(Adach additional interlocal agreement with the new City to confirrn that it desires to become a part of the exis6ng
Sheet If netessary) Spokane City-County Solid Waste Regional Project. The City Council of Spokane Va11ey has now
approved this arrangement on May 27, 2003. In section 3 of the agreement, Spokane Valley
pramises to direct all solid waste generated within its geographical boundaries to the System. This
agreement confirms our acceptance of the new City as a part of our interfocal solld waste system.
RECOMMENDATION: approve RsCel lropaei: x wA BRdgOt JktoullC o ruA o Expenditure: $ #
o Revenue: $ #
o Budqet Neutral
BTTACN •Qn fi or Review in Office of Clty Clerk
SIG TIN
.
Depa ent Head ~Dfon i ctor ~~f~~"t~I •
/ ~ ' gu
Legal City Ad inistrata for Mayor Council President
1ISTRIBOT101L /David Mercier, Spokane Valley Robert Beaumier Asst City Atty
City Manager
Dennfs Hein, Solid Waste
S}rstem Director
Bill Wedlake, Spokane County
Solid Waste Director
cooNCii acnoN:
APPRQWED BY
SPOKANc uITY (%auNCIL: -
t;i [Y CLER
S oka00000*
ne
~
,,;oOValley
11707 E Spraguc Ave Suitc 106. Spokanc Valley WA 99206
509.92 1. 1000. Fax: 509.921.1008. cityhallQspokantvalley_org
Memorandum
To: David Mercier, City Manager, and Members of Council
From: Nina Regor, Deputy City Manager
Date: March 28, 2006 Re: Monthly Report - Summary of February 2006 Activities
Human Resources
Recruitments - There aze a number of newly filled positions and recent position openings. Following is the ~
rccruitment status of each position.
Building Inspector II Maric Hillabrandt submitted his resignation effoctive March 6. Position
is oEx;n and advertised. First review of applications scheduled for
March 10.
I CenterPlace Pasitions are npen and advcrtised. A pool of available applicattls is
1 Iost/Hostess-On-call being sought for tlhese on-call positions.
Engineer-l)evelopmcnt I ienry :111en has accepted the position anil he's schedtiled to begin
«orking for the Cih on Nlarch 13.
Maintenance [nspector Positian is open and a(lvertised. First review of application is I
scheduled for March 24. Two positions were authorized by City
Council, and will be filled contingent upon the successful bidding of I
various road- and startnwater- tnaintenance agreements.
Police Chief 1,01) c,inilidates %~cre intervie~~ed February 13 anil invited tu Senior
Staff itirctings. Sclection con[ingent upon Spokane C'ounty decision
r•egarcling intcrim Sherriff; anticipatcd by end ciCl~larctt. I
I Recreation Coordinator Yositioit is open and advertised. 0 review of applications was ~
scheduled for Februarv 24. _ I
Training
• Preventing Workplace Harassment & Discrimination class was held for all employees with an
additional class held for supervisors.
PubGc Informaaon
• Worked with Journal of Business to provide access to information on permit activity for publication of
- statistics in the Journal. This will also minimize the amount of stafftime to provide answers and
eliminate unnecessary public records requests, and helps build a cooperative relationship with the media.
Deputy City Manager Monthly Report - February, continued
March 28, 2006
-2-
• Reinstated posting of business licenses for Spokane Valley on website, providing ready access to
inquirers and minimizing staff time needed to providc answers.
• Put together packages af handout information for Mayor's presentation to the Spokane Valley Kiwanis
to help provide more in-depth information about City projects including additional Comp Plan dates, information on CenterPlace facilities, listing of classes offered by Community Colleges of Spokane
(CCS) at CenterPlace, listing of street projects planned.
• Drafted letter for Community Development outlining permitting process pertaining to pole buildings to
educate constituents, pointing out advantages and improvements to help keep them informed and up to
date, also to minimize customer upset.
Website updates and additions
• Worked with Community Development to revamp Community Development main page and
supporting pages to standardize appearance, provide additional information, and make navigation
easier.
• Revamped Planning Commission main page to look consistent look with appearance standazds and
make navigation easier.
• Finalized and posted new Traflic Management pages to describe the functions of the traffic
management section, and make information readily accessible to the community.
Contract Administration
• Presenied seven service agreements with Spokane County to Council far approval
• Met with Comcast representatives on February 21 to discuss franchise agreement
• Finalized contract with consultant to perform technical review of Comcast cable system
• Completed review of 2006 Spokane County contract cost estimates
Business Registration
24 new business registrations
462 business registration renewals (Due annually in December)
Web Site
Web Site Summary - Month of Fcbruary 2006 Numbers reJlect full or majorrty weeks o/'1he monlh
Unique User Sessions 25516
Top Five Pages Viewed
Employment 4306
GIS/Maps 717
Community Development 628
CenterPlace 514
Mirabeau Point Pazk 420
Top Five "Referrer" Web Sites
Spokane County - Jobs 445
Spokane County - Gov't Employment 254
Municipal Research and Services Center (MRSC) 140
Spokane Valley Online 131
Google 122
Valky
11707 E Sprague Ave Sufte 106 ♦ Spokane Yalley WA 99206
509.921.1000 ♦ Fax: 509.921.1008 4 cityfiallQspokanevalley.org
Memorandum
To: Dave Mercier, City Manager
From: Ken Thompson, Finanoe Directar
CC: Nina Regor, Deputy City Manager
Date: March 14, 2006
Re: Monthly Report
I}uring February, finance cmployees worked on the following projects:
Yeac end financial close out
Staff is working to close out the financial recocds foc 2005. Prepatations are being made to prepare the
Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) and to assist the auditors in their review of 2005 city
records.
Once the CAFR is prepared, we will send copies to banks, bond undenYriters and bond rating agencies to
keep them updated on our financial status.
Website undates
Staff is updating the city website so that current versions of the 2006 Budget, an updated copy of the Six-
ycar Financial Forecast, Quarterly Revenue/Expenditure Reports and the Budget Calculator exercise are
available.
Februarv retreat
Finance staff participated in the February retreat to update council and departments on projected revenues
and expenditures.
Budaet variancelinvestment reoorts
Reports showing a comparison of selected onerati fund revenues and expenditures to our 2006 budget,
at Febniaty 28, 2006 are attac6ed. This report has been modified from what you normally receive so that
relevant daia on operating funds is presented for yaur review without the "clutter" of reserve, capital, debt
service, equipment replacement and risk management fund transactions. Operating fund revenues flow
more consistently to the city by month than other fund rovenucs. Outgoing operating fund expenditwes
also flow more consistently by month, than other fund expenditures. Some funds (reserves, debt service)
have no transactions in a typical month.
This approach should provide policy makers with more relevant data for the operating funds each month.
The quarterly reports will show al1 city funds as they have in the past.
Footnotes and the investcnent report are also attached for your review. Please contact me if you
have questions or desire clarification.
City of Spokane Valley
Selected Operating Funds
Budget Variance Report
Year to Date at February 28, 2006
January 8
2006 Fetxuary YTD Unreal¢ed Percent
Budaet Revenues Revenues Revenue $ealizgd
General Fund Revsnues:
Property Tax $ 8,281,000 $ 20,416 a 20,416 $ - 0.2596 1
Salea Tax 15,400,000 1,778,804 1,778,804 13,621,196 11.55
Gambling Tex 810,000 7,912 7,912 802,089 0.98 4
Leasehold Excise Tax 2,500 427 427 2,073 17.08
Franchise Fees/Busineas Lioenses 681,750 9,043 9,043 672,707 1.33 9
Stab Shared Revenues 1,121,000 1,593 1,593 1,119,407 0.14 4
Ptenning 8 Buildlr►g Feea 1.800.000 196,061 196,081 1,403.939 1225
Fnes and Forfeitures 1,350.000 109,568 109,566 1,240,434 8_12
Recreatbn Program Feea 385,516 53,840 53,840 331,878 13.97
Investrnent Intemt 131,300 55,985 55,985 75,315 42.64 8
Operating Transters 40,000 - - 40,000 _
Gwiera► Fund a 29.803.068 $ 2.233,647 $ 2,233,647 $ 19,308,835 7.49%
Other Fund Revenues:
Stroet Fund $ 3,813,000 $ 186,815 $ 186,815 $ 3,626,185 4.90%
Ho6eYMotel Fund 351,000 22,509 22,509 328,491 6.41
StoRnwater Fund 1,539.900 6.974 6,974 1,532,828 0.45 1
Other Funds $ 5,703,900 $ 218,298 $ 216,298 $ 5,487,602 3.7996
January &
2006 February YTD Unrealized Percent
Budaet Exmenditures E nditures Ex nditurea Realized.
General Fund Expendkures:
LegisletFve BranCh $ 304,267 a 88.581 $ 88,561 S 235,888 22.54°i6 2
Executive b Leg[slative Support 470,105 54,171 54.171 415,934 11.52
Public Safely 18,873,541 83,969 83,969 18,789,572 0.50 3
Operatans & Admfnistratlve Svcs 1.441,170 221.718 221.718 1,219,452 15.38
Public Worka 980,192 124,610 124,610 855,582 12.71
Plannlny & Community Dav. 2,138,700 214,200 214,200 1,922,500 10.02
Parks 8 RecroaOion 1,854,868 192,785 192,785 1,861,881 10. 39
General Govemment 5.825,000 302,788 302,788 5,522,214 5.20 16
$ 29,885,641 $ 1,262,820 $ 1,262,820 a 28,622,821 4.2396
Other Fund Expenditures:
StreetFund $ 4,131,256 $ 62,979 $ 82,979 $ 4,048,277 2.0196 7
HoteVMotel Fund 400,867 4,242 4,242 396,425 1.06 7
Stormwater Fund 1.821.534 23 584 23,584 1.597.950 1.45 7
$ 6.153.457 S 110E5 3 110.805 $ 8.042.852 1.80%
311512006 1:11 PM
Clty of Spokane Valley
Investment Report
At 2-28-06
Total
LGIP' F&M MM Investments
Beginning $ 18,615,404.33 $ 4,492,121.24 $ 23,107,525_57
Deposits 3,561,239.32 - 3,561,239.32
WithdrauNs - - -
Interest 137,994.52 24,506_08 162,500_60
Ending $ 22,314,638.17 $ 4,516,627.32 $ 26,831,265.49
Balances by Fund
General Fund $ 8,613,568.30
Street Fund 4,050,582.70
Arterial Street 1,189, 074.54
Paths 8 Trails 15,743.78
HoteUMotel 269,958.56
Center Place Op 308,289.38
Service Level Stab. 2,350,943.99
wnter Weather Res. 511,222.86
Capital Projects 2,715,051.27
Spec. Capital Proj. 2,565,628.56
Street Capital Proj. 783.92
Mirabeau Point Proj. 453,809.36
Street Bond Proj. 1,060,92522
Parks Capital Proj. 357,856.01
Civic Bldg. Cap. Proj. 511,222.86
Startnwater Mgmt. 1,158,644.83
Equipment Rental 673,011.29
Risk Management 24,948_06
$ 26,831,265.49
"'Local Govemment Investment Pool
FOOTNOTES
Note: 1 Revenue from prop. Tax and Stormwater fees received qtrly
2 AWC membership for year, paid in Jan
3 Paid in March
4 Received quarterly
7 Expenditures are greatest in summer months
8 City estimate is too low
9 Mostly franchise fees which are received qrtly
16 Large part of budet is contingency. Emergency use only
I
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
FEBRUARY 2006 MONTHLY REPORT
LONG RANGE PLANNING:
Planning Commission
The Spokane Valley Planning Commission met twice during the month of February The
Commission continued its review of proposed definitions and a schedule of permitted uses,
regulations implementing the Comprehensive Plan. During Fetxuary, the Comrnission held five
public hearings on praposed amendments to the intenm development regulations.
Long Range Planning Staff
TFie Planning Division continues to update the draft Comprehensive Plan with City Council
direction. Planning staff attended 5 City Counul deliberatioNdiscussion sessions durfng
February on the Planning Cammission OraR Comprehensive Plan Progress continues to be
made with an estimated Plan adoption date of mid-April.
CURRFNT PLANNING:
The Planning Division opened 18 land use appUcation files in February 2008. In addition, 25
licenses/permits were sold. The charts below tradc present monthly activity along side 2005
levels. LicenselPermits include 6 adult entertainment, 18 home profession, and temporary use
permits. Land Use Adions include 7 land use pre-apps, 1 rezones, 3 short plats (includes
preliminary and final), and 3 boundary line adjustments.
2006 Licenses 8 Pertnits Issued
50~
,0
30
20
,o
o -
Jan Feb Mbr Apr N~y Jum Jul AuD I Sep Oct ~ Pbv Dec
zooe ~ 4+ 25 -4-2oos ~ 41 1 ze '18 34 21 1e I e t n n 45 ~ 3e I 3e ,
The Planning Division approved 3 cammercial permits during February including a 13,000
square foot affice eddition at Cerrtral Pre-Mix and a remodel and addition for occupational and
physical therapy at The Gardens Skilled Nursing Facility. Additionally, the Ptanning Division
received 12 new commercial permits during Febfuary and 9 commeraal pre-apQlication
meetings were conducted.
Page 1 of 7
City of Spokane Vailey
Depahment of Community Development
February 2006 Monthly Repoirt
2006 New Land Use Actions
aa i
30
20
10
,
0 I,lan ~ Feb I Mar Apr Nity Jun Jul Aug Sep Ocf Nrnr DeC
=z 2006 20 t 8
2W5 15 22 20 24 18 ' 33 28 I 17 1 17 ; 26 18 ' 20
Monthly revenue for the Planning Division totaled $13,105 in February; 32g6 af the revenues
genefated in February 2005, and 52% of the revenues generated during January of 2046.
2006 Planning Revenues
5so' ap i
s~o.oa,
sm,ooo
i20,000 ~y ` _
510.000 ~ .
SO
.Stm Ft-b Mar AM Nay .kme .kry Aug 5epl Ocl NW ODC
Fievenue 2i1:1Fj -f- Revvmue -W5
Revenues generated by the Planning Division are compared with the 2006 Budget appropriation
in the table below.
2006 Planning Revenues Compared with Budget
~vervies -
so $ao.mo sao 00o $eo.oon seo,ooo s,oo.ooo t,7o.o0o s140.ooo s160aoo $180,000 szoo.cro
u nctt,ai v rD W-vfjrn,e o nrnual sApcf BIWrete I
Page 2 of 7
City of Spokane Valley a
Departrnent of Community Development
February 2006 Monthiy Report ,
BUILOING D/V1S10N:
The 8uikling Division issued 233 peRnits in February 2006, compared with 277 for the same
period last year. . This included 41 permits for new one and two famify dwellings and eigM new
commercial structures.
2004 CONSTRUCTION PERMTS
800 ~ ~ - _ •
- - -
40C
~ r -
70D
~ ie I M 1r eM u~r A" ~Y w Mw Oa1 "w O*t
-i
'L7ZOo IYrwft Zn I m^
-t:(qSA'w1U -_2!0 lr7 501 UN 574 '6S7 94 AV _]n -475 fp ~ lOf
. . _ _ . . . _ ' _
2406 Ntw StructuresNntts Parmltted
so
~a
2D
tp l . 11
,lan f ab Nar Apr Nay June Juiy /luQ SePI 0c1 Nov d►t ~
-a Maw t a 2 DwelRnp Unlts 29 41
■ MuMt-hmily UnAs 0 0
n Ner CcmImetiinl 5vucturn'l 3 ~
The Permit Center collected a total of $93,341 in Permit and Plan Review Fees in February
2006.
2005 BaNdlng Ravsnuo
mmc
e3enoo •
uu mn . ~ p~601 ~~I ~
t++e aC c mr, n:c _ -a-20C5 Itw
67C7 rA~
se - - - -
The reported value of construction, induding new strudures and additions/alteration is shown in
the following chart, comparing these values with 2005. New value for February 2006 totals
$6,370,591 for a total of $10,856,554 for the year so far.
Page 3 0! 7
City of Spokane Valley
Departrnent of Community Development
Febn,ary 2006 Monthly Report
loot rto ewnainp ar.ews Coap.na.an ewlpl
r..-nr ~ i~i~ isas
w " n nco um,noo ww,ow woo,oao ci.uon.ooo n san~oo t~..aa noo
• A:tur rm 14i.am. N Mnuu A..au he'unoa
SOURCE Spo0.ane Valby Finance Deparbnent
In February 2006, building inspectors performeti 818 inspections in 19 days. This averages 43
inspections per day The Plans Examiners reviewed 70 projects in February 2006. At the end
of January, there were 6 projects awaiting review.
I
200~ 8ulldlnp In~p~ctbns
: _ . - • _
~o • t ~
a ,
'"~:DI~ iua.:frr~ OI7 1♦ 27M.nRt+n!9y 0NII 1tu ~W ~Gi• '.la 'll:' 1:1 'l111
The Building Division is pleased to welcome Anita Blake as a Permit Specialist.
The division regrets the loss of Mark Hillabrandt who retums to Santa Cruz, Califomia.
I
Page 4 ot 7
~ j City of Spokane Valley
Department of Community Development
February 2006 Monthly Report
CODE COMPLIANCE:
Code Campliance Officers Berg and Schutz reviewed the 2005 activities of the divisian for the
City Council. Dunng Febnlary 165 pfopetty owners were contacted abaut brirtging their signage
into comp(iance. Approximately 7496 of those corttacted have removed portable signs, banners
and other prohibited signs along portions of Sprague Avenue.
The number of `Yolations Reported" on the following chart reflects actual Spokane Valley
Zoning Code v+olations, plus complaints received which were nat violations. The complaints
reoeived are added to the total because they refiect time officers spent in the fleld conducting
investigations. In addition, the 'Irnestigated' and "Pending' columns accuratety reflect Code
CompHance's curreM ability to process and investigate back{og cases.
The fol{owing chart provides a monthly comparison of the types of Spokane Valley Code
violations reported. volations are reported based on the primary complaint received, rather
than the number of additional violations identfisd on any individual premises. The investigation
of a complaint of junk vehides, fof example, may also resutt in identification of additional
violations such as the accUmulation of trash or harboring of livestock These are not included in
the summary. A total of 52 complaints were processed in January
CODE COMPLJANCE STATUS REPORT
tno
tso
oo
w L1 - 1L ~t kl ~_1
o -
1.1ai•65 Ap05 wry-05 .lun-35 ti~-'A Aup-JS Seq- DE l?ct-o5 Nov ]5 Dec OS :ni-Cr FebOQ
!a VrrYMwer fieporMd a Abe1oreno O FL Trm»1ws \ Flmdlnp Fi+
Adivity is consolidated into the following six categories: Environmental (sewer/septic, critical
areas, animal and nuisance violations); Property (Right of Way, property use, dangerous
building, landlord/tenant, illegal business and signage violations); Junk Auto; Solid Waste (solid
waste, il{egal dumping, and household waste violations); Cleanriew Triangle and Complaint -
No Violation.
2006 CODE COMPLIMICE REPORTS (Dr type)
toos , -
ees
~ox
~
l-
J.+-oe r-Woo i Mw oe ^o os urr oe in-oe M oa w++o-oe sm►aa ; c43-0s rwr-06 U.c-oa
,
o ConIrno - No vWldfan 14 12 '
• Soid Wrale ~ f t 11 . .
oxnkAWU 10 9 .
G CiN VwY Timl~ j - - 4 - . . . • 1 fltq~artr ~ i . . .
~o Ghvravr.rnei ~ . Q
Pago 5 of 7
City of Spokane Valley
Departrnent of Community Development
February 2006 Montfily ReQort
CUSTOMER SERVICE
Planning
The Planning Desk handled 263 phone cails and talked to 319 walk-in customers at the
Ptanning Counter during February. The Heanng Examiner held three land use hearings during
February, which included a SEPA appeal hearing
Building: Pernnits
The following table summariies the performance of the Permit Center for those permits entered
in the PLUS system, measurad from the time that the application is deemed "counter-complete"
to the time that a permit is issued. Values shown are those on which Plan Check and Building
Permit fees are based. The chart inciudes average, minimum and maximum times. Oelays in
the issuance permrts may resutt from inadequate or incomplete sutxnittals, failure of the
applicant to pick up the pennit, etc..
Feb-M - I ° o 0 0
a Valua Q c x
`o
s
NEW
I CONSTRUCTfON I I I I I
Industria! Bulfdft ~ 1 ~ 87,151.00 ~ 19 ~ 19 I 19
sU„ccu►e I1 I 12.2000o I1 I 1 I 1
REMOOEL I I I I I ~
APt 3 SUorY or lesa ~ 1 ~ 7.900.00 ~ t ~ t
; FinspltaUtnstifvtlon ~ 1 1 W.000.00 ~ 80 I60 ~ 60 '
~ MercaMlle ~ 1 I 6.000.00 ~ 18 18 ~ t 8
ofte/Prvfessional I>> I 613.283.00 I1e 1 I as Reliqious Bulldinp ~ 1 ~ 8,663_00 ~ 8 ~ 8 ~ e I
ADnmON I ( I I
offkaPro~nal I1 I 1.347.388.00 i ss I e6 F-i s
~ c►rnWA oF usE I I I I I
' C~fioelPrdessslonal ~ 1 I 0 I 203 I 203 I 203 ,
The Permit Center has been tracking tumaround for Right of Way PeRnit Applications and the
faxed Mechanical and Piumbing Permit Applications. At present the City responds to
applications within 24 hours, typically by noon on the followirtg day
Building: Inspections
Inspections are conducied the day following the inspection request except for weekends and
holidays. Currently we are using one on-call inspector, Tom Melboum to not only help with our
inspedion loads, but to perform all of our residential plan reviews
Code Compliance
All preliminary investlgations are conducted within 24 hours except those recsived on Friday
which are investigated before the end of the next business day.
Pertnit Center
There were four sunreys retumed dunng the month of February.
Page 6 or 7
City of Spokane Valley
Departrnent of Community Development
February 2006 Monthiy Report 1
PERMIT CENTER SURVEy
~~Department of Communrty pevelopment
Fsbrvory 2006
1) I vEs'rt ths Permit Ctater 0 AAore tl►on oncc c wesk 0 Weeicly 0 Oncc a Month I Occasroml}y ! First visit
2) Ths purpost of ery visif(s): Q Cxner'al Informotion ( Icmirg/Plat 0 Bwldlrg Pvmit 0 Other Perrtur
0 Metting Q C.odt ComplanM 0 F1oar'ing Q Use Petrt►it 1 I.utn9e Q Otha'
3) Ths Deportmsort/Dhrislon I eone to sst +rns Plonning Q E^4i^ce*i^9
Bui{ding Pernrts 3 Znspect,onu Q Plrg. Bldg 6 Enqineenrog
coee complionce 4 Other (=pecify_
4) I nss.dsd to see (NonK), ad thry wsre: Avoitabk Q On the pFwne Q Not awibble
5) ParWt Cadv staff is (cl+eck dl that WpIy) ~ F^endly I Courteats 1 IGnwkdgeeDle 1 Fieip}ul
1 Prompt Q Curt or abnupt Q Nscourteais Q Aueless Q Urnwlling to help 0 Sbw Q
Oti+w ' -
6) TekpMne ooqs to staff mexbers ore retured g 1Mtfiin 24 hours Q1Mthin thi reek Q Ncver orawered Q
Othrr
7) Mp coM wat hrowftn'ed Q Onct Q Twlct Q Mora than twlce 0 Nerer
8) Infonmwtlon providsd Is jAcauratdCompkte ~ Well researched 0 IrnppQrabk 0 Incornqleta 0 Other
9) Tht PsnnFt Genter is lVyrJl-onpniiod Orderlr 0 Too crowdcd 0 Too noisy 0 Disorgaruud
10) If avoflabls. I use/ rould uss: 1 On-line aipplications ~ Fnx epplicarions 1 On-line peyment 0
Other
Suggestiorts for lepronhg Services
COUNT y
Commerrts rcceived:
1. Signage on Sprogue
2. Tied with the City of Spokaru for coope.mtionlnttitude
3_ Ke.ep Karen
4. Hire more office staff - people won't have to wait for 1 person in front of them fQr 25 mins.
I
Page 7 ot 7
spo`~ane
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
.;0OValley MONTHLY REPORT
~ February 2006
AGREEMENTS FOR SERVICES ADOPTED AND IN OPERATION:
• Street Maintenance - County Street Maintenance Interlocal
New 2006 Interlocal approved by the County. In the process of bidding various maintenance activities
per the new agreement.
• Engineering Services Support - County Engineering Interlocal
• Street Maintenance (Pines & Trent) - WSDOT Interlocal
• Solid Waste - Regional Solid Waste Interlocal
WASTEWATER:
• Wastewater Treatment - The end of January 2005 the City received from the County financial
information regarding the County's sewer utility as it relates fo the assumption of the County owned
sewer facilities. • The Spokane River Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Collaboration process is ongoing and
information is available on the web site at http:/lclient-ross.comispokane-river!
• Spokane River Use Attainability Analysis (UAA) is availablz on the UAA web site at
htto://www.sookaneriveruses.neVlinks.htm
CAPITAL PROJECTS:
o Valley Corridor Project
Met with the Advisory Team to review concerns from SRTC related to traffic model capacity
issues. Determined four alternatives and input into the traffic model to see which best
addresses projected increased traffic volumes as well as other identified deficiencies. Currently
reviewing results and preparing operational analysis. SRTC has offered to replace the allocated
$4.2M in TIB funds with STP(U) funds so the July deadline of getting a preferred alternative on
the MTP could be removed. Waiting for written confirmation of this offer and then we will bring
this issue before Council for review.
o Street Master Plan
Proposals were received from two consultants: HDR (teamed with USKH) and J-U-B. Both
firms were interviewed and J-U-B was selected as the most highly qualified firm. We are now
working on developing a scope of work and fee schedule.
o Contracts for Construction Services
Contracts have been executed. J-U-B Engineers has submitted a scope and budget for the
Dishman-Mica Road Rehabilitation Project. Century West will likely be chosen for Argonne
Road. J-U-B Engineers or CH2MHILL will be chosen for Broadway Avenue to provide
construction management and inspection services.
Construction o PinesfMansfield Federal funds have been released for Preliminary Engineering. The County and State are designing
their respective areas of the project. Environmental permitting and discipline studies are in process. The
right of way acquisition phase will begin after environmental permitting is complete. The project has
been delayed due to environmental permitting issues and will now advertise for bids in the Fall of 2006
' with consVuction to begin in 2007.
o Dishman-Mica Road Rehabilitation Project
The Contract was awarded to Cameron Construction. Construction began on Thursday, March 9'". The
roadway is scheduled to open the week of April 3nd.
o Broadway Avenue Overlay Project
Federal funds have been released for Construction Engineering. The low bidder on the project was
Inland Asphalt. Construction is scheduled to begin in mid June.
o Argonne Road Overlay Project
Federal funds have been released for Preliminary Engineering. Design is 95% complete. The project is
scheduled to bid in April.
o Appleway Avenue Reconstruction - Tschiriey to Hodges
Federal funds have been releasgd for Preliminary Engineering. Environmental Classification Summary
(ECS) has been approved. Budinger has completed geotechnical investigation. Adams & Clark has
completed topographic survey. David Evans & Assoc. has begun design engineering. This project will
advertise in 2006.
o CenterPlace :
Working on final project closeout. -
o Barker Road Project
The low bidder on the project was Eller Corporation. Construction will start in early April_
o Barker Road Bridge Project
Type, Size and Location Study has been approved by WSDOT. CH2MHILL has submitted scope and
budget for design engineering and permitting. Contract will be finalized by the end of March.
o Park Road Project
Project Substantially Complete - Punchlist items remain.
o Parks Road Sanitary Sewer Project
Project 95% Complete - Nora Avenue West of Park Road to be completed in the Spring.
o Orchard Avenue Sanitary Sewer Project
Project 60% complete - Project will carry over to Spring 2006.
o Veradale Heights Sanitary Sewer Project
Project design 100% complete - The bid opening was on March 8~h. The apparent low bidder was
Norm's Utility Contractor. The project has not been awarded.
o Electric RR Sanitary Sewer Project
Project design 100% complete - The bid opening is scheduled for March 15~". '
o Vera Terrace Sanitary Sewer Project
Project design 50% complete - Project will bid late spring 2006.
TRAFFIC:
• Still working with Bing to connect a workstation to the Spokane Regional Traffic Management
' Center.
• Working with consultant to inventory all school crosswalks for re-marking in plastic.
• Assisted capital projects engineers on traffic design issues for Broadway overlay, Argonne overlay,
Mullan reconstruction, and Barker Road reconstruction.
• Worlced with Avista Utilities to install a streetlight for the University High School crosswalk on 32d.
• Met with West Valley High School officials to address congestion and safety issues.
• 4- Construction and utility work related traffic control plans were reviewed and approved.
• 15 - New citizen requests/complaints were received via phone and email. These typically involve
traffic signals, stop sign requests, speeding complaints, bus stop concerns, streetlight outages,
requests for new streetlights, traffic count requests, and parlcing issues.
STORMWATER:
• Finalized bid documents for Landscaping & Weed Control Services, Street Swzeping Services 8
Vactoring Services. Three contracts will bid in March 2006.
• Working on stormwater solutions for 2006 sewer projects and other miscellaneous projects
• Contracted out services with Adams & Claric for flooding/erosion solutions for the Beverly Hills
project. Project design is scheduled to be completed by April 1, 2006.
• Working with Spokane County and City of Spokane amending the regional stormwater manual.
• Contracted out services with Tetra Tech/KCM & GeoEngineers for a soil study to determine topsoil
requirements to provide water quality treatment. Consultant is in the process of analyzing soil
samples.
~ l COUNTY MAINTENANCE ACTIVITY:
City 2006 budget is $3,023,068 ($2,274,700 in the Street Fund and $748,368 in 'the Stormwater Fund).
Through the end of February the County has billed $238,059 for Street Maintenance, and $53,788 for
Stormwater Maintenance, these total $291,847 or 9.7% of the budgeted funds.
LAND DEVELOPMENT
February Activity: _
NEW APPLICATIONS
COMMERCIAL APPLICATIONS
o Valleyway Apartments 36 Unit Apartment
o GVD Commercial Bldg 7918 sf Retail Bldg
o Central Pre-Mix Addition 1978 sf Addition
o Hartson Salon Bldg and Parking lot renovation
o US Army Corp of Engineers New gravel surface for vehicle storage
o Dragon Beer Garden 800 sf beer garden
COMMERCIAL PRE-APPLICATIONS
o Greenacres Exxon Addition 3767 sf Addition
o West Valley School District Classroom additions to 3 elemenfary schools
o Redlin Office Addition 2562 sf of{ce addition
~
' o Spokane Discount Addition 3,175 sf addition
o Coremark 100,000 sf warehouse (Industrial Park)
o Pines Office Bldg 9,700 sf office and parking lot renovation
o Spokane Valley Heritage Museum 698 sf school
FINAL PLAT APPLICATIONS
o SHP-21-05 3 lot short plat
LAND USE PRE-APPLICATIONS o PRE-07-06 UR 3.5 to UR 7` and 4 lot short plat
o PRE-09-06 Flora Estates re-plat 36 lot subdivision o PRE-10-06 UR 3.5 to B-2
o PRE-08-06 3 lot Binding Site Plan
SHORT PLAT APPLICATIONS
o SHP-05-06 3 lot short plat
o SHP-03-06 2 lot short plat
o SHP-04-06 4 lot short plat
REZONE APPLICATIONS
o REZ-04-06 UR 3.5 to UR 7"
o REZ-02-06 UR 3.5 to UR 22
o REZ-06-06 UR 3.5 and 6-1 to B-2
o REZ-05-06 UR 3.5 5o UR 7`
BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENTS
o BLA-07-06 Boundary line adjustment to create 3 lots from 2 Iots
! I S
S`po~l~.a:rie
~Va11ey Capital Improvement Projects
2006 8 2006 PROJECTS
Propoaed EsUmated DoslBn ConstrucUon 2005 (2008) Total Project
Funding Road Constructton Projects Project Location Bld OAtQ Complotlon Date Complato Complete Fundinp Cost
TlB Park Road - ProJect 2 Bth Avanue to 2nd Avenue 5131/08 10096 99% $ 821,000 $ 472,OOU
STP(U) 161h Avenue - Project 2 Dishman-Mica Road ro SR 27 5l31/05 10096 100°,U S 1,932,000 $ 3,302,000
716 8arker Road RecansWction 8oone Avenue tv BaAcer Road Bridge Mar-06 10115J08 tOb% 0% $ 1,150,000 $ 2,998,200
STP(U) Dishman-H1ica Road Rehabllitatfon Sprague AvQnuo Eo Appleway Avenuo C.7er-06 4110105 1009'o 1D% $ 48,400 S 57,100
STP(U) Argoruie Road Overtay Indiana Avenue to Montgomery Avenue AAar-08 611106 95% 0% $ 274,000 S 316,600
STP(U) t3roadway Avenue OveAay Batee Road m Sulllvan Road hlar-06 1S/1106 100 % 0°/u $ 703,000 $ 812,700
CDBG A4ontgamery Avenue RChabllitstian Univatsiry Road to I•90 an ramp 1 i/1l05 1th0°r6 10096 $ 439,850 $ 439,850
CIry 8th Avenue Overtey Farr Road to Universiry Road 1111/05 1 00'96 100% S - $ 270,000
CDEIt'a Montgomery Avenuo Rchab #2 Argoniie Road to Universily Road h4ay-00 10l15!'06 U% Oei6 S 471,d00 $ 471,000 take out?
Road Dcalpn Projecta
TIB/CA9AQ PineslMansllQEd Project VYifbur Rd. to Pines Rd., Pinas lo 190 bc1-08 81151U8 405'0 0% $ 620,000 S 3,134,009
STP(U) Appteway Avenue ReconsUvctlon Tschirley Rd. to IiOdgos Rd. Jun-06 110J15106 20% 0% $ 166,800 $ 3,197,000
BRAC S9rtcsr Road Brtdgo Replacement 8erker Rd_ at Spokane River Jan-00 1211/09 0'°k 0% E 702,000 $ 8,957,615
Cily SulBvan Road Extensian (9igelow Gulch) _ Pday-07 10/1108 w0 0% 7ake aut7
Sower Prolects
Camahan I-90 to 81h. Havanna to Eastern 7!1lQ5 1009'0 10fY°k $ 2,569,000 S 2,569,000
Shenvood FarestlMica Park/Johnslon Apple+vay to 161h, Siesta to WoalniN 9115105 100% 1003b $ 2,570,000 S 2,570,000
Inland Broa4way to Spraguc, I-90 to Park 12/1105 100% 100% $ 660,000 $ 660,000
Pertcs Road Trent to 1--90, Thierman to Paric 6l1I06 100% 95% $ 1,445,000 $ 1,445,000
Edgertan Utah to Trent, ElizabeUl to Park 12I1105 100% 100% $ 2,503,000 $ 2,503,000
Orchard Avenuo Spokana River to Liberty, Cotemart to Vista 7115106 106~k BU°h S 21885,000 $ _ 2,695,000
Ciry Veradale Heiqhts - Pavebaek Valteyway to Mission, Evergreen to Adams PAar-06 10115ftl6 10096 6°Yo $ 397,2E0 $ 397.260
Ciry Vera Terrace -PavQhadc 2nd to lth, Ev¢rgreen to 8wrns A19y-06 101151d6 7596 d'0v'6 $ 208,250 S 209,250
Cify E1eCt1fC RR - P8v8bsCk PBfk i0 Vst3, Tf2Rl 10 U18h DA.11'-06 10115108 1009'0 0% $ 308,790 S 308,790
PLanninA ProjoCts '
STP{U) Va11ey Corridar Erivironmental Study Universiy tn Applevray nJa Jan-04 6% 0q6 $ - $ -
Park Road Grade Separalion (61V) Park Road at BNSF RR and Trent Mar-07 3096 U%
TiB Valley Couplet - Prajeci 2 Univarsiry to Everpreen Mar-07 0% "a
STn 1.1419sion Ave. 8itiewalk ASullan to Universily n!a o% 64"0
Conterplace at Mirobeau Polnt
Construcifon in Pragrsss 91U5 1909'0 99% $ 9,500,000 S 9,500,000 ° Total $ 30,386,450 $ 47,086,366
STP(U) - Surtace 7ransportalion Program (Urban); TIB - Transporta8on Improvement Board; 9RAC - Bridge Replacement AdvE:,ory Commiitee; CDBG - Community Development Bbok Grant Program
CMALl • Conpestlon ManapemenUAir Ovalfty Proflram; STA - Spokane Transit Atrthority
Fab 2006 Constructian Projects
~e
Val ley
11707 E Sprague Ave Suice 106 ♦ Spokane Valley WA 49206
509.921.1000 • Fax: 509.921.1008 ♦ cttyhallospokanevalley.org
Memorandum To: Dave Merc,ier. Nma Regor. Membera ot City Coundl I
From: Mike Jackson
Date: March 23, 2006
Re: Monthly Report ior Febniary 2008
Administntion and Par4s:
• YMCA contrad renewal for the 2006 Ayuatics program is completed. '[be YMCA wil) continue
to aperatc and mainWin thc City's throe atndaor pcxols. Thc management fee increASed by 4%
over 2005 opcrations.
•'Two of the four Valley Mission arenn slables burnnd down. Thc cau.se of die firc has not yet becn
determined. 1 mect with insuranre adjustcr and it was dclennincd thai the City's insurance would
covcr the cleanup casts. Threc bid5 were receivod and the st$blcs that werc damagcd wure
cleatiup so as to not cuuse n public ha7ar+d.
• The old Senior C'enter buikiing on Mission sufferod a water line break and was damaged by
Ilooding.
• Auctufccl !AC wuekshop to obtain infutmation regarding grant oppcMunitics_
• Met with Camcast repwding fitture advertising opportuniGes.
• Partic:ipated in 1{erassment trnining.
• Wr took 44 park neservations in the month of February for a total of 77 this year.
TO ,
so { -
50 ,i ■ Total 2008=71
qa ! ■ Total 2005 = 200
30 ~ D Totel 20134 = 158
20 - O Tote! 2003 = 92
10 I~. - -
Jle 0
et J~
('eaterPlnce:
• 2006 Gmups F3cxoked:
January 14
Februury 33
March 45
April 23
Mav 17
lune 10
luly 1S
August 17
Scptember I 5
Cktobe,7 4
Novemhcr I
I)cx:ember 7
Est. Total Groups Booked YTD: 201
Scnior Cenlcr:
• I'he kilns were repnir~,~d nnd we wil) laok st scheduling maintenancc of'thc kilns every six
months.
• Washingtun Uaited Qualiry Nursing Home CarE hcW a mccting regxrding state reimburscment
for nursing home care. 'Ilie press wa5 invitud, along with nursing home care providers.
• Carpet was instalicd in Senidr Wing reccption area.
• Spukane Vallcy lligh Schcol studcnts a5siated thc ac.miation volunteers in the grccnhciusr
planting 146 geraniums and starting plants far 30 hanging bu.5kets. 'fhc fcillowing day,
Associatinn voluntccrs went to thc l ligh School to hcip in thcir E:ncnhousc.
- IN'IEMO
7'Q: 1:)avc Mcrcicr•, City Manager
FKOVI: Cal V1Walker, Chicf of Policc
. George Wigeu, Administrative Scrgcant
I)A.TT: viareh I.fi, 2006
RE:- iVlonthly ltcport February 2006
Flttached is the activity rcport for February 2006 for the Spokane Val.ley Police Department.
Compuler-aicled ciispateh (CAD) incidents totaled 4,508. Ihese xre self-uutiatect officer
contact;s, as Nvell as calls far servic•e. Out of.` those incidents, 1, 160 actual reports were taken
durinb the IllOiltll of I'ebruary. A.ttachecl is the break.dnvvn describing Ehose inc.idents.
Additionally, thcrc wcrc 1,664 traffic stops conclucteci that resulted 'ui 215 traffic reports.
Inchicled arc the hatspot maps for February residential burglaries; February cocnmercial
burglaries and February traffie callisicros, along with .Tanuary 8c February stolen ve.hicles.
ADNLINISTI2ATIVE:
♦ Chief Walker attenciecl a mee[ing of t11e Joint Public Safety i..eadership Forum and
addressed the ongoing Communications 1nCrastructure projects.
J ♦ February was the secoud mouth of the Police I raiiung Officer trial program, and Lt. Patty Daiuier reported on the progress and status of the program to Clucf Walker anci
Captain Gerry Hojtik of the SheriiPs Department.
♦ Chief Walker participated in a media conference to cliscuss recent fraud incidents tliat
have occLU-reci in the Spokane Va]ley. There have been no other reported 'uicidents
from this group since thaC cUn:['erence and nublic awareness campaigu.
♦ 1"he City of Spokane Valley StaFf Winter .Retrea[ was held 'ui February, with Chief
Wal_ker aPd other staff mcinbcrs participating.
♦ A. cnmputer progar1i called Rapid Responder is being usecl statewide to map schools
and other public buildings so that this information is available ta first respoilders in
enlergency ! disaster situations. Spokane County has been involved for several ycars in gettuig this program implemented, and Chief `Valker took part in February in a
plar►ning meeting inr fi.irther developrnent. Wc arc working hard to expand tlus
prograui into the privatc sector for higher-risk buildings and businesses.
COiVINIUNITY ORIENTED PQLt.CiiNC:
♦ Neigliborhood Watch Coordinator Dimia Soinerville and Crime Prevention Officers
Greg Snyder and Travis Pendell spent time in February prepaz-ing for their first annual
Page 1
two-day conf'erence, scheduled f.ur March 7 and S a# CcnterPlace, iNuznerous SC(,}T'E -
valur,teers were scheduled to assist during the con&rencc, ~
OPERA"T'IONS: -
1'rerDawn R,aid Nets DeugS, ArreSts
More dau 44 pe.rsonne] from a ha1f-dozen la-w enfbrcement ageiicies raided aSpolcaneValle}r
rnabile home park and execu#eci search warrants on fivc residences suspected of c~ri.taining
dnigs andfor stalen property, iNii1e suspec~~ were arrested at #he Rose I-iaven Mobxle.H.ouae '
Park, 205 S. Park Road, u+hen detecfives and others puumd into the coIIUnunity about 5=30
a.m. Detectives raided inabile homes in spnes 3 6, 5 3, 55, 59 and S 1. 'Detectives seized six children and tuined tfiem over to Child Protection Serviccs staff to
be plac:ed in temporary fost4~r care, '1'hree of the cliildren, ages 9, 2 auxd six months, were
I removed frarn trailex #53 where acraclc pipe was fotutd inside the baby's crib aaid a jacket I
cantaining syriuges was discovered beueatk-k the crib, ~
Participants in the early-morning raid inoluded members of.'the Fastem Washington loint
Fugitir,e Task For-,e (Spokane Courtty Sheriff s Office. U.S, A4axshal°s Dffice ali.d Dept_ of
- Corirections), the Bureau of Alcohal, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF"), the
Washzngton State Patrol, and Chiid Protective Services. Rcpresentatives of the Sheriff's ,
Office iui.cluded trair~lng deputies, school resource depu#ies, reservc dcputics and members of
the In-vestigative S uppozt Uaat and Property Crimes Task Fvrce.
Tay Guris, Choice of pEay Lncation a Bad )Mix , .
Fou~ Spokane Valley teenagers found #hcmselvcs under intensc scrutiny, th.ree af thein on the ~
graund, wlien they chose l:he backszde of azt Fask Spxague stri p malI tv cvnduct their simulatcd war games, i
Undersheriff Dave Wiyrick was conducting a traf'fic stop at Evergreen and Faur.t}t about I
4:30 p,m. 'when he was appraached by two plainclothes security aua.rds who told him there I
,was a man with a rifle behiiid the businesses on the i-ioi-d-iwest conier of Sprague and ,
Evergreen_ Wiyrick drove his pIain-marked car past the a11ey behind tlie stares and spa#ted a I
inan with a rifle standing beside a dumpster. He made a u-ttuzi wid as he entered the a11ey, ~
spotted two suspects standing by a residential fence. Orxe v,fas attempting to hide apisfiol
bchind his leg. Wiyrick exited his car and drew his own pistol to confrant the Mo suspccts.
He had theni drop their v,feapons and then orclered the third -sirspect by the dumpstcr to drop
h!S gurE and join the pair On the grpund_ ,
While he wa~ holding them at gunp0int, he spOtted a fourth man with a ii~.1e_ He prdereci
him to drop it and wafiched as the two private security guards took hinx into custody,
Numerous ~pokauie Valley Police of£icers responded to assist and quickly determined that all
of the four suspects' firearms were toys. Wiyrick later said that although sorxe had the
niandated oralige tips an the banels, it was impossibIe for hiin to see that #hey were no# rcal
, firearms from any distancc.
TIYe twa secuffly guards liad reported tliat oiie of tlie businesses in the strip mall was a
jewelry store. While the off'icers were interviewing the fiour, an employee said ftonx arx open
bac:k door tb.aC they liaxl iireal guns°° inside. "The (Spakane Valley Police) officers tald them
that their choicc of location to play with toy guns was completcly inappropriate and cotuld
have 'had tragic consequemes iC an anued citizen or einplayee had seeii theni behind thc
Page 2
stores," Wiyrick said. The Four teens were driven to their homes by nfficers who planned to ✓
have a similar discussian wiCh their parents. -
School Sccurity Vidco C'aptures Hydrant Vandals
v'ot only did a pair of vandals flood park.ing lots anci streets by opening fire hydrants around
Spolcane Valley onc weckend in February, they also flooded a home in the 3400 block of S.
- SunriaNvn Drive causing hundreds of dollars wortli of damage. Schonl Resource Deputy Jeff
Duncail obtained security video from Univcrsity High School that shoNus the two suspects
turning on a hydrant to flaod the schqol parking lot, theu fleeulg in a dark-color.ed compact
car. Spokane Valley Fire Taepartment imrestigators are targeting ttie vandals as well as are the
Spokazie Valley Police. .
Rottt►ms UP Burglars Bagged
Quick assistance frnm the Sherif-f:'s Forensics Unit led to the specdy arrest of the suspects who
buralarized the business office of the Bottoms Up Tavern. Someone climbed into the tavcrn's
false ceiling from insidc an unmarked batliroom after closuig Sunday night and woi-nied theu
way over a wall and intd the office where they stole cash, checks and credit card receipts.
Detective Kirk ..K.eyser weitt t:o tlle tavern at 13921 F.. Trent ancl suecess['ully liftecl the
prints. TIe liad already developed i.n.fonnation that an emplayee at the tavern; Tari R.Wenu,
21, 17304 E. Fourtll, ~vas reportedly in financial di.ffeu]ty, and that her boyfriend was
1vlatthew C. Stockton, 25, 20209 E. 1\4ica View Drive. Keyser took the print5 to the sheriff's
Forensics Uffice and asked that an eYpedited couiparison be macte witli Stock-ton's prints,
alrcady on file iri thc AF1S (Automated Fingcrprint ldentification System.) Foreusics
Specialist I..ori Preuninger made the rush comparison and canfirmed the prints from the
Botlnuis Up belonged to Stocktnn.
Keyscr deterinincd that Stocktori and WEntz had rented a room at the Motcl 6 at 1919 NT. Hutchinson the day of the burglary ancl hacl heen paying cash each day since. He oblained a
search warrant for the room, the cwU suspects and Cheir vehicle. He then executed the warrant
ajid Pound Wentr inside the room. She indicated Stockton was oul lxying lo purchase hernin.
Deleetives siood by unti] Stockton returned, and they found lierain and methamphetanune in
his passession. Search of the room asid car turned up $1,500 in cash aticl rolls of quarters
stolen in the burglary. Keyser also recovered new clothes that Stoclcton had ptLrchased with.
the proceeds of the burglary.
Keyser booked both Stock-ton and `Ventz into the Spokane County Jail on felony counts
of Second Debree Burglary and First ]7egree Theft.
Sergeant Smokes Last T'rent Burglar
A Spokane Valley Police sergeant ulten-upted an ul-progress burgla-ry a.nd may havc helped
iclentif'y the suspect in an ongoi.ng spate of East Trent break-ius. Ser;eant Mikc Kittilst`.red
was patiolling Trent in the area of Adams Road when he spotteci a man in dark clothing
walking wcstbound about 1:30 a.m. Knowing there had been a months-long series of break-
ins at busuiesses located along Trent, Kittilstvecl Nvatched as the tnan approached Harvesl
Foods, 14515 E. Trent. 'I'here was no venciing machine or payphove for the mati to patronizc,
so the sergcant riu-ned off his headlights and continued to watch fYOm a nearby parking lot.
, The suspect \valked to the front doors fuld begxn kicking thc glass in the entryway.
_ KiKilstved called for backup ofi:icers when the suspect success.f.ully smashEd out the glass
Pagc 3
and entered thc buildiilg. The suspect exited thc business seconds later carrying fivc cartons .
of cigarettcs. The sergeant ordered him tn the ground and held him at gunpouit until Officcr
Tiui Jones arrived tn assist in the arrest. Officer Jones cirove the suspect to Spokane Cotmty
Juvenile Detention and booked him on a felony cowit nf SECOnd Degree t3urglary. Property
crimGS detectives will continue their investigation into othcr recent East Trent burglaries to
dctemiine if the samc teen was involvcd in those crimes. '
SCUQTFRS AND BIKES:
♦ Iii Nebruary 2006 therc were no repdrted collisions involvuig motor scooters or pectal
bikes. Page 4
/ I
2006 FEBRUARY CRIME REPORT
Feb. 2006 Feb. 2005 2006 to date I 2005 to date I 2005 Total
BURGLARY 1 651 47 107 1 107 1 997
FORGERY 1 271 321 45 1 74 1 465
MALICIOUS MISCHIEF I 791 581 172 1 117 1 1,224
PVON-CRIMINAL I 511 561 114 1 125 1 916
PROPERTY OTHER I 771 821 161 1 225 1,665
RECOVERED VEHICLES 141 261 40 1 49 390
STOLEN VEHICLES 291 351 78 1 76 1 577
THEFT 1481 1701 301 1 371 1 2,853
UIOBC 11 21 11 21 10
- VEHICLE OTHER ~ 0l 01 0 l 41 40
VEHICLE PROWLING ~ 671 651 163 1 1481 1,382
TOTAL PROPERTY CRlMES ~ 5581 5731 1,182 1 1,2981 10,519 .
ASSAULT I 551 701 123 1 128 1 880
DOA/SUICIDE 181 171 351 25 1 164
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE I 311 641 69 1 122 1 755
HOMICIDE I 0l 01 0 l 0 l 5
KIDNAP . ~ 11 41 51 6 1 24
MENTAL ~ 381 511 81 1 77 1 386
MP ~ 51 5 131 21 1 106
PERSONS OTHER ~ 771 83 1781 223 1 1,624
ROBBERY ~ 1 ~ 11 7 ~ 81 58
TELEPHONE HARASSMENT I 61 $I 151 21 I 190
TOTAL MAJOR CR/N➢ES 1 2321 3031 5261 631 1 4,192
ADULT RAPE I 21 21 61 3 I 37
CHILD ABUSE ~ 81 161 171 30 I 128
CUS70DIAL INTERFERENCE ~ 71 61 191 16 205
SEX REGISTRATION F I 0l 11 0 l 2 4
INDECENT LIBERTIES 1 31 01 71 1 I 21
CHILD MOLESTATION 1 51 41 11 1 121 77
CHILD RAPE 1 31 31 81 91 30
RUNAWAY 1 221 201 481 55 1 437
SEX OTHER I ilI 81 28 I 181 162
STALKING I ol 11 0 l 2 1 35
SUSPICIOUS PERSON I 171 211 34 1 47 1 341
TOTAL SEX CRIMES ~ 781 82i 1781 . 1951 1,475
DRUG ~ 771 731 161 1 154 N 999
ISU OTHER ~ 0l 0l 0 l 0 l 1
TOTAL fSU ~ 771 731 161 1 1541 1,000
TOTAL TRAFFIC REPORTS ~ 2151 1361 474 1 4481 2,776 -
TOTAL REPORTS-RECEIVED 1 1,1601 1,1671 2,521 1 2,726 1 19,962
-
. ,
{err~en ~ ~ 'W4"
.
G `=Lt'r,(~
rVl ~
►refw'ay ~s_~ ~ a►~ . + \ ~1~ ~y _ } j
~
. .~R~~r ~J~~ ~-1~^~~~ r L_+~_ ~ y ~ y .
'
~ ~ , j , - . . ~ ~ , ij~ ~ -
90
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _l~~ ~~i~ ti►,ts n' ; _ ~ ~ ~ . t •
40
.
j . 10 (
a8tn~
4 Mts*~ ~ i ='t 'y~ r"~ • + ~ ~
_
1 .-`ti 3 N -l~ ~ ~ ~
. f d ` ° -•P~`- -p ~ , Srd , , ~ ~ ~t~ l , ~ " ~ , S-
~
. - . 1~
p,1M~ ; , • r _ _ ~ ~ . -~q~ ~ ~1' ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ c j. G,
1
.
. , .1 '
~ t'- • ~Y~a ~ ~ n --ttt+ t,~p ~ , j _ ~U , j ~ _ _ , t f. s
. ,
_
~tt ~ _ ~ 1 1 , - i - 4 . , ~ ~ z 32~~---•
S 4 'y~ ° ~iFy~ i i I~t~u'i w'V ~y r~ ~ r.~ y xo L-- ~
AA 39 ~ Yr«+ric CO►tta4
~A-
^~41 , ~1'-` q~{~ ; y~~) {p Q~V•a ~~ry
~ ` ~ • ~ j"~ .~n ~y~'" " ~ i~ -~{Ut
~ 5sa 4ti~ ~ rr ~
~
: - - 31e1
r3~ J ,p
t • ' n ► `a~,~t'T~ ~ , t ~ ~ 7 Ms'cti ZilOE>
; - ~i ~Q1 y~ ~ ~7 ~ ` I ~ h~18~ S~t'OC1U ■
-t 1 ~ _v CD ~ : ' `4~ ~ ~ ..u - . ~ r ~ _ . _ ~ ~ t 4 ~
~ l'I[1~to6 ~'j ~ ~ C3~~- f'~U 1 .S~b~l~= ta~p- r'
1 ~ ~ -.1"iS,►~r : ..i Z _ m~ ~ a L
nn'
-i -
Ay
• ` ~p 11 4 ~ r p -fF~l'c~ Y 1 ` . ~
SP ~ p~~~!i - ~ ~ ---~,'a t~• ~ Nw;,
r--
_
Ui'~'
- -
?L
J~ . ~r}~pp-~• ~ - _ r, ~ _~~~~t~_~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ - ~ - ~t 4 AU - b4 ~ ~ ` ~
- :"I " a ~4 N~ t ~ ~ ~r- -
. .
- ~ ca[,~, ~ : l - ~
~ it.
~ gnarp ~ ~ s' b`~ ~~2 , t,t~i l L- ~ ~~n 1 I._ -
~ ~ ' • ~ i _ . ~ . °L1 1 i --r,
~ ~ ~ t►n ~ A~~ -9 QL~~
:
h
ei
S 'c ~~.'.`'"~i..4• - t- Ti 1 .(J~ ~ - ~ l., 4
~ ~i ' ~ ,~i'r ~ ~.•~S t _ ~,p r S ~i;nf
. '
rf
~
A~' po;ny''~'-~
Cort►"'°rcia
~
th
ii
~ 1 1 ~ 3 d guty4ry
tz
N "J t~
pt7,
`D
40 1~►+' 44i1i
Q
tf3 `
-LOW
ImMediu
+
~ - • 1~~ j~ ~ ' ~ .~'O ~ ~Hig"
,tqp! _ _ 16'i 'gr) ~ s t~ prodWed:7
~ 4 tle ~1 ti- lµ 1' ~ M8P r
ts a
rf' .
~.r.►~a r'V "o~i S
Lt~
7
C rcwm t !
Q 4~r
l~
~ P s - o a
5PnngH ~ ~ l „ ~ ~ 1 _ - ` _ • ~ ~
~
2 P
' I _ s -
N"AY ~ i ~ g. m 3 m ~ ~1fc! _
~
Ell, d m r v 7~
iab6 - : ♦ % - ~ Hu~ e
~ r
=-~=t rlck -Gr1u:c~ M l 5 \ '
1
I :ti,
U~~~1 ~J ~ • ~ ~ 1 " , ..r t ~ - ~
~
3 { I .
ri
~ ~
IJ,r~_ _ - •r _ i~~~~oil,~i u:i ~ - -
~
' ~ - ' ~ ~ fuW~ • t _ t,i w„N _ ,~~X~~, ~ y
C8
no
LS - - ^ t--~ - -
~ en
--1IIt!
- - ~ Bto~lik° AJK
• _ ~ T ~
L . ~
r~in _ e~~l~~ `~h,,~ _ h ~ _ ~ ~ t ~
~ ~ ~ 2►~~ ~ inl 1S - ; _ 1 I ~
.t n
uk-',rr' . , • • ~ Cu
!3~1a4L~ X ~°f ~ t1~~' T • 11Ut - - ~
.tuuii . 3~1 _ ~ _ w~- '•.I _
;6~~_i_~'
141h 1 0
IR
~ ~ ~ 1 BIh ~ : ~ ~Z , ' _ _ ~ - ~ / ~
r ~ / ' ♦ ~ ~ ~ - ~'~h. , d ~ _ l I
-~Gtt ~ ~ tiv ~ry ?I ~ ~ ~f, i ,~`"~~_:d~,~i •u~~ ~ ~ ~
_ .~51 ~ 2151 ~r ~y. ~S~ ~ ~ ali~~ - -Z~v~:~•E ~ ~ ~y'y~ ~ ~ z
♦ - ~~Y~r ~ ~ . _ • I ~r . - _ ~ ~ i ~L _ _ t5 - _ ;l.'fU~
2591 ttI S2011 4
WA , ~ ' ~ - J4 I
I
_-1- 31~ _L I
- ! - ~ ` ~ ~ ~ ' - ; ~ ~ 40 ` 9 ~ {3~ie Tatt Buld~~l
'r►t{sl
m
~ry
~
I3 • I~ t~ ~ . tltl r q4+/th
~ ~ ~ 6) ~ O
I O
43
441h o
ic
M Low
' N
MMedium
9
~
~
~ High
ro
~ . .
° n5 ~M" 2006 February Residcntial Burglary Hotspots M°PProduc°d:7March2008
7- -
r•
7
;
x
2 sc r~ I`o siFy
; ~ , 8
~ m -.ti ~ - g-- ~ . ►~iy,~
1_ Sprin~ m j m~fl J ° ~ LL_ _ a W 3 ~
i_
; ~ - i - - ~ ~ ~ h _ 1_► - ~ } ~ T ~
-
J % Kis to. § s 14
~ a s E~.~'!
Eu ~
~ - relx3aN ~xi~ I9~~~ ~ ~~~I F
I..~... . g~ICJICW
I ke10. Gem"-1 , 1 m_ ict~~ ~ 5 ~~"T ',l ~~a ~~~•'oA
R
I t i Kn
I ; - . ; i 1
_ f . j,nnwn- lndionp nt fa
J.
,~talR__ ~ O
m:
~ _ - f ap I~ A~n
~ •~o~iw i ' ,
LAc~i~ct l~ 5 rP k1~ -1 - I ~ - ~ r-v p I 01
0~7t1~-A -
f m
tAFL,
~ Aik I J1 ~v~ iurrd - fd t _ au - -bih
:r►l ~°r~
~ " •1 1 t ~a~' ~ T ~ ~ ; - 1 . l ~ ~ Otn s1 '
-7u,~'!~
~;Na[.~,G~, ~ ~ ~:~i• . ~~:1 ~ ~
ju
3 U~
-~T iaEn
i a, ~ 14~ ► a' til y~ LL~ yllr~I I
~-1t U1 9 4
~ ~
~7 - - - - ~ 7
• _ - Q~~' - • w ~t
250, ~ ~ : ` , ~ az~~ - `sz1~u • 1 ~r~ ,l-; N _ _ ~ ~ _ ~
12 ~ T
u ~ tp
i T-r L ~
-]tal N~1 y 3gm 19t,
alr~ a0t~i.~~ 9
- sr+ _ BnNo Tar
`
y
~l 6a1, 8tukn
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~bl. ~ ~ ~ . ~ ' 44111 o Vohk bs
431
~~,-l ~ ~s n~ic
-1_~ ,4, ..S ^~ie n ~ r ~ ' , . ~~r ~`~-i~'•, ~ 3 . ~ W Low
;
MNtadium
9
~
16 r Ell High
r
° 2006 Jan & Fcb Stolen Vchiclc Hotspots MaP Produaed: 7 Merch 2006
, . ~
~(aT~~~~e
~
Vafley
11707 E Sprague Ave Suite 106 ♦ Spokane Valley WA 99206
509.921.1000 ♦ Fax: 509.921.1008 ♦ cityhallpspokanevalley.org
Informational Memo
Date: March 28, 2006
To: David Mercier, City Manager and Members of City Council
From: Neil Kersten, Public Worics Director
Cc: Nina Regor, Deputy City Manager
Re: 2006 Sewer Paveback Update
Spokane County's 2006 Septic Tank Elimination Program includes three projects within the City
of Spokane Valley:
Veradale Helghts: This includes the area north of Sprague Avenue between Evergreen Road
and Adams Road, from Nixon Avenue to Mission Avenue. This is the largest of the three
sewer projects this year.
Vera Terrace: This project encompasses the area south of Sprague Avenue between
Evergreen Road and Bums Road, between 2nd Avenue and 8"' Avenue.
Electric RR: This project is on the west side of the Town of Milh+vood between Park Road and
Vista Road and between Trent Avenue and Utah Road, which is immediately south of
the Union Pacific Railroad.
The County has completed bids on Electdc Railroad and Verdale Heights. Both bids had only
one bidder (Norm's Utility Contractor) and both projects came in over the engineer's estimate. -
The County has determined that it is in their best interest to award the bids at this time. Based
on the first two bids the County has also revised the estimate for Vera TeRace. The following is
the original approved budget and a revised budget based on the actual bids for the two projects.
The project shortfall for paveback is shown at the bottom. The drainage costs are currently
within budget.
Revised Budget based on Project Approved MOU Budget Bids
Paveback ~ Drainage Paveback ~ Drainage
Electric Railroad I $77,000 I $52,000 $87,369 ~ $37,000
Vera Terrace I $241,000 ~ $41,500 1 $341,264' 1 $41,500
Veradale Heights ~ $357,000 I $37,000 I $430,2561 $42,000
Contingency I $100,000 I $19,500 1 $75,040 1 $19,500
Total Costs I $775,000 I $150,000 ~ $933,889 ~ $140,000
~ Shortfall ~ -$158,889 ~ No shortfall ~
'Red is a revised estimate based on
Informational Memo 3/28/2006
2006 Sewcr Paveback Update Pagz 2
the recent bids.
We are proceeding with the award of the bids on Electric Railroad and Veradale Heights. In
order to fully fund Vera Terrace we will need to increase the County Memorandum of
Understanding (MDU) by $158,889. Approximately $50,000 can be funded with CDBG funds
and the remaining funds will need to come from the capital project funds from the preservation
projects. There is cuRently $1,033,843 in that line item. We have decided to defer all
preservation projeds from that line item this year until the Street Master Plan is completed in
2007. This will allow us to use the funds as determined by the new Street Master Plan. The
funds in the preservation line item for 2046 can be rolled over into 2007. We will bring a
proposed amendment to the MOU to Council in April.
Please let us know if you have any questions or comments.
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: 03-28-06 City Manager Sign-off:
Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
xxinformation ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Infortnation Item: Resolution Regarding Mackay Manufacturing
BACKGROUND: The attached draft resolution was submitted to us from Koegen Edwards, LLP, and is
similar to those Council received in the past (in December 2005 from WEDFA concerning a proposal for
Four Corners Capital; and in April 2004 for economic development revenue bonds to the Lawrence B
Stone Properties 411, LLC Project to provide fmancing for the renovation and construction of buildings
to be leased to SCAFCO, Inc.). With each resolution, the City must approve of it by legislative act such
as a resolution.
As in those past instances, this resolution attaches no city liability to the financing. The City's legal
department reviewed this and it appears to Ihem that the City is sufficiently protected. RCW 39.84.060
specifically states that we have to approve it to go forward, and that there can be no recourse against us in
the event it fails, and that such a statement is also required to be included on the face of the bonds sold.
Unless Council directs otherwise, this item will be included on the April 11'h agenda for resolution
approval considcration.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS:
STAFF CONTACT: Cary Driskell
A"I'I'AClIA'f[?NTS Draft Resolution
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
RESOLUTION NO. 46-0**
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE ISSUANCE BY THE INDUSTRIAL
DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF SPOKANE COUNTY,
WASHINGTON OF NON-RECOURSE REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 2006A
(MACKAY MANUFACTURING, INC).
WHEREAS, the Boazd of County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington, by
Resolution No. 82-0160, adopted on February 23, 1982, created 7fie Industrial Development
Corporation of Spokane County, Washington (the "IDC") pursuant to chapter 39.84 RCW, as
amended; and
WBEREAS, the IDC expects to issue $1,300,000 of Non-Recourse Revenue Bonds,
Series 2006A (MacKay Manufacturing, Inc., Project) (the "Bonds") and loan the proceeds
thereof to MacKay Manufacturing, Inc, ta finance: (i) a portion of the cost of acquiring,
constructing and installing equipment used in the manufacture of surgical and electronic
components (the "ProjecY") and (ii) a portion of the costs of issuance of the Bonds; and
WHEREAS, RCW 39.84.060 provides that the IDC cannot issue the Bonds except upon
the approval of both the municipality under the auspices of which it was created, which is
Spokane County, Washington (the "County") and the county, city or town within whose
planning ,jurisdiction the Project lies. This Resolution is being adopted by the City as a direct
result of that statutory requirement; and
WHEREAS, the equipment to be purchased as part of the Project will be installed at the
manufacturing facility located at 10011 East Mantgomery Avenue, Spokane Valley, Washington,
which is within the boundaries of the City; and
VAiEREAS, on April 11, 2006, the IDC's Board of Directors adopted Resolution No.
2006-02 approving the issuance of the Bonds anticipates approving the issuance of the Bonds.
NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley,
Spokane County, Washington, as follows:
Section 1. Apvroval of Issuance of Non-recourse Revenue ObliQations Pursuant to
RCW 39.84.060. Pursuant to the request of the IDC, the City Council hereby approves the
issuance of the Bonds by the IDC for Mackay Manufacturing, Inc., under the terms and
conditions of, and for the purposes provided in chapter 39.84 RCW, and within the meaning of
RCW 39.84.060.
Section 2. In approving the issuance of the Bonds, the City Council does not assume
any responsibility with respect to any payments due thereunder. In accordance with RCW
39.84.060, (i) the City is not obligated to pay the principal of or the interest on the Bonds; (ii) no
tax funds or governmental revcnue of the City may be used to pay the principal of or the interest
on ihe Bonds; and (iii) neither the faith and credit nor the taxing power of the City is pledged to
the payment of such principal or interest. Any Bond issued as a result of this Resolution shall
coniain on its face statements the limitations set forth in Section 2(i) -(iii) of this Resolution.
Section 3. Effectivc Date. This Resolution shall be in full force and cffective upon
adoption.
Adopted this day of March, 2006
City of Spokane Valley
Mayor Diana Wilhite
A7TEST:
City Clerk, Christine Bainbridge
Approved as to Form:
Office of the City Attorney
Spakane County Library District
Spokane Valley Library Services and District Support
Report to the City of Spokane Valley
February 2006
Customer use measures, District-wide
Through February 2006 most customer use measures aze up, many considerably. The registered
bonower total is 996 ahead of last February. A 9% yeaz-to-date increase in circulation was
accompanied by a 3696 increase in cusfiomer-placed holds. The 36% increase in door count can be
attributed in part to the increased hours, new Moran Prairie branch, and the fact we re comparing
2005 monthly samplings ta 2006 actual "machine" counts. Program attendance and meeting room
bookings aze also up in the double digits.
Other online service statistics also show significant increases: 3896 in database searches and 48% in
retrievals, a 339b increase in Web site user sessions and an 88°,U increase in page views. Sofiware
station bookings aze down slightly, and because in many branches the equipment capacity has
been reached, large ongoing increases just aren t possible.
Library resources, District-wide
The library materiaIs collection size is inching upward. With year-to-date additions of 11,548 and
deletions of 10,979, the total is now 398,891, including periodical issues.
Customer use measures, Greater Spokane Valley
AlI Spokane Valley customer use measures are up year-to-date, more than can be atlributed to the
additional open hours. In addition, the number of registered borrowers is seven percent higher
than February 2005 at 110,833. Mast measures aiso continue to be higher at Argonne and Otis .
Orchazds Libraries. '
Library resources, Greater Spokane Valley
The total Spokane Valley Library materials collection size at the end of February was 113,297, and
2,786 items were added to the collection yeaz-to-date. Another 1,549 were added at Argonne and
Oas Orchards.
Selected February 2006 Statistics
CircuIatian Daor count Reference Program Software Stativn
Inqniries Attendance Bookings
YTD YTD to YI'D YTD bo YTD YTD to Y'TD YTD to YTD YTD to
2006 2005 2006 2005 2006 2005 2006 2005 2006 2005
SCLD 1 315,9361 9.1 % I 191,9131 36.196 I 35,3451 - 22.196 I 9,1411 19.896 I 28,9791 - 0.8%
Spo Valley I 82,7061 4_796 I 47,120 20.996 I 12,2661 16.6°Xo I 2,0831 23.59b I 9,6781 5.5%
Argonne I 19,4961 3.396 I 17,200 47.6% I 1,9051 19.5% I 2621 15.4%1 2,208I-4.096
Utis I 13,7341 4.1% I 9,4011 27.596 I 1,1381 -12.796 I 2981 104.196 I 1,316 0.596
Subtotal 1 115,936 2.1% I 73,7211 4.2% 1 15,3091 141% I 2,6431 28.3%1 13,202 3.3%
% SCLD I 36.7% I - I 38.496 1 - I 43.346 1 I 28.946 I I 45.69i6 1 -
Page 1 of 5
February 2006 Registered Customers by Branch of Registration
2006 Total % of YTD Change % Adult % Youth
5CLD from 2005
Total 110,833 - + g,6X 74.5% 25.5%
SCLD
Spo Valley I 37,0241 33.49i6 I + 7.196 1 76.59b I 23.5%
Argonne I 9,8581 8.9% I + 6.9% I 76.8% I 23.2%
OHs I 5,732 I 5_2% + 5.7% I 67.496 I 32.6%
Subtotal 52,6141 47.5% + 6.9 % I I -
At branches serving Spokane Valley residents...
Regionally: Between the flu and a nasty stomach bug, there were many absences to cover this
month. And, Just to make things interesting, the bulk of them hit just as the library card
promotion visits were ramping up. Coverage was a bit thin at times, but we didn't have to cancel
or reschedule any of our visits-and all of our regular programming went off as planned.
We'll be visiting sQCOnd graders in 23 elementary schools for the "Your Card to Adventure"
library card sign up promotion during February and March. After a discussion with YMCA staff
on partnering with teen programming, plans were made for SCLD staff to do an evening pcetry
jam at the Y's teen all-night lock-in event on March 14th. Youth services collection work focused on
weeding the Easy Reader collertion; for adults it was novels.
Sunday circulation is leveling out at Moran Prairie and continuing to increase at Spokane Valley.
Average circulation on Sunday grew from 127 to 291 at Moran and 331 to 564 at Spokane Valley,
with Super Bowl Sunday and a holiday weekend thrown into the mix.
Spokane VaIley programs include two Web Basics classes (8 attending the first session and 6 at the
second) and two For Love of Movies programs this month. Attendance at "Holes" was 15 and "The
Rescuers" had a crowd of 25-which might have been larger had the Spokesmun-Review printed the
conect starting time. In addition to District-sponsored programs, AARP Tax-Aide assistance
began three days a week-and being the only Valley location, the 8-10 volunteers often have 3540
waiting for help at the beginning of their session. This month also saw the start of Free Legal
Advice Night two evenings each month, during which a local attorney provides pro bono legal
assistance.
Argonne storytime attendance was good throughout the month. The display case featured Russian
memorabilia supplied by an SCLD staff inember. West Valley Schools provided colorful artwork
from Centennial Middle School, including some good representations from cable cartoon shows.
Otis Orchards joined the wireless libraries. Overheard in the library: Son- "That's like the third
time you've told me that" Mom- "So what7 I'm old."
Outreach highlights: Staff provided a short presentation on the services that SCLD provides to
homebound customers at an Opportunity Presbyterian Church congregate luncheon. Quofie from
last September's L&rary Journal (Source: Library of Congress National Library Service (NLS) for
the Blind and Physically Handicapped): The number of books read by the "average NLS patron,
an individuaI with a visual or physical impairment" is 7 books for every book a typical sighted
person reads.
Page 2 of 5
Friends of the Library: Greater Spokane Valley
Argonne: Friends of the Argonne Library met and madc plans to bump the scheduled book sale
from June to April because of the quantity of items they have accumulated already. They
purchased a very nice sign holder to advertise upcoming programs.
Friends of the Library: Other District
Ainvay Heights: The Friends of the Airway Heights library is launching its book discussion group
February 28thand had a planning meeting earlier this month.
Fairfield: Friends held a very energetic meeting with plenty of brainstorming for fundraisers and
programming, and pledged to continue support for Summer Reading and Spokane Is Reading.
Moran Prairie: At their meeting preluninary plans wcre made for a onc day book sale latcr in the
year.
Collectians
■ Ordered 1,500 tides and 4,870 ropies in Eebruary, very similar to January with about the same
number of titles but fewer copies. Processed and sent out 4,937 items to branches; 4,916 items,
excluding periodicals, were deleted from the system.
■ Added 185 items to Child Care Packets.
■ Ordered animal series nonficdon and "literary" animal nonfiction in prepazation for the
summer reading program, with its "Paws, Claws, Scales, and Tales" theme.
■ Went through the ALA notable lists and supplemented our collections with the few titles from
the ALSC Notable Books for Children and YAISA Best Books for Young Adults
recommendations that we did not already ow•n.
Programming
■ The For the Loue of Mvzries series at North Spokane and Spokane Valley continued its "family fun
for everyone" theme in 2006 with Wednesday evening movies intended for older teens and
adults and Saturday afternoon movies targeted to children and their parents/caregivers.
• Web Basics was offered twicc at Spokane Valley and oncc at Otis Orchards.
■ Linda Hunt, author of Bold Spirit: I felga Estby's Forgotten Walk across Victorian Amenca, and
theater professor Pat Stien ciid a dramatic narration of Linda's book at 1Torth Spokane.
B
Trustcc appointment
■ The Board of County Commissioners appointed long-time Spokane Valley resident 7'im
Hattenburg to a five-year term on the DistricYs board, replacing retiring trustee Claudia
Parkins. His orientation meetings began at the end of the month and will be completed in early
March.
. , O
State legislature
f1s of the end of February, all oE the highest interest bills I've been tracking continued to make
their way through the legislative process, surviving cut-offs. They include SB 5333 (voter-
approved multi-year levy lid lifts); the State Library's electronic doctunent archiving bill (SHB
2155); the bill that would provide funding to the h4unicipal Researrh and Service Center to serve
Yage 3 of 5
special districts (SSB 6555); and the State Board of Educakion bill (FSHB 3098) that includes
requirements for school library media center programs.
All bills have unti15:00 p.m. on Friday, March 3 to be approved by the opposite house.
Library Legislative Day
In spite of the Senate and House floor schedule, the February 9 Library Legislative Day was quite
successful. Over 100 library supporters attended briefing sessions, roamed the halls of the
Legislative Building, and had an opportunity to see both houses in session.
Over a two-day period, I was able to visit with aIl of the legislators I intended; some in their offices
and others outside the chamber doors. There were many positive comments about the importance
of libraries and the job that we do-and there were no comments or criticisms about any aspect of
our services or operations.
Strategic planning
2004-2006
'fhe 2005 progress report for accomplishment of 2004-2006 strategic plan objectives was completed
and shows that of the 24 objectives,ll have been fully met, 2 partially met, and 11 not yct met- so
we're about halfway there for the current plan.
2007-2009
The new strategic planning committee met twice to begin its work on the 2007-2009 strategic plan.
The first meeting included an overview of the process used to develop the current plan and an
evaluation of the current plari s effectiveness. At the second meeting, community needs, vision,
and librazy service responses from the 2004-2006 planning process were reviewed, and that
inforrnation was used to discuss potential revisions of the same goals for use in the 2007-2009 plan.
The result of the discussion, which covered the point of the plan, purpose of goals, and how goals
are reached through accomplishment of activities, was "fine tuning" two of the current goals and
the mission statement. Therefore, the same basic goals and the same basic mission statement will
be recommended for use in 2007-2009.
Spokane Valley Library Planning
During February I began working on background materials for a recommendation on
commencement of planning for the new Spokane Valley Library. This included adding more
detail to the planning schedule, tying it to a potentia12007 LCFA election date, and obtaining
updated construction cost estimates.
With the certain change in the 2007 primary election date to the third Tuesday in August (that bill
is sailing though both houses of the State Legislature), also comes a change in the election filing
deadlines for the primary and general election from 45 days to 84 days prior to the election date.
Special elections deadlines move from 45 to 52 days prior. This means that if we aim at the
August 2007 primary, the filing deadline will be at the end of May. Whether we ultimately choose
this date or another, all aspects of election planninK must be completed earlier.
O • :
• Courdinateci joint promotion with Red Cross for disaster preparedness programs. I
■ Drafted and distributed news announcement on new trustee Tim Hattenburg.
Pagc 4 of 5
• Outlined new Web site look, continued working with author's publicist, and determined logo
colors and poster design for Spnknne Is Keading. Had 2005 autographed posters framed for each
branch. ~
■ A page and librarian posiHon were filled, there was one transfer, one promotion, and one .
termination. Recruitment was carried out for three positions.
■ Completed revisions to the performance evaluation instrument, as well as the employee self-
evaluation form, and will be scheduling training for supervi.sors on use of the new forms.
■ Staff training was scheduled on preventing carpal tunnel syndrome and personal safety. The
INCOL spring workshop, "Google: Competitor or Comrade," will be presented by U-W
Information School professor and Americmt Libraries rnlumnist Joe Janes.
INFORMATION • O
• bVireless access poinls were configured by Tony and installed at Spokane Valley (2na access
point), Otis Orchards, North Spokane, Medical Lake, Fairfield, and Deer Park. That leaves just
Argonne, Airway Heights and Cheney, which will be installed in Mazch. They're working
well and are getting used. ,
• The new mobile laptop training lab was deployed and existing lab re-imaged.
■ Branch staffing schedulers are now using new softwaze for that purpose. Individual schedules
ran be e-mailed to employees and Web access will soon be enabled.
■ Remaining District pmperty was removed from the old Moran Prairie store-front facility.
Fixtures that could be used elsewhere were relocated and installed in other branches; items
that couldri t be reused and had a minimal value were disposed of.
■ All work on the DistricYs 2004 audit has been completed. We're now waiting for the final
notification from the local office of the SAO regarding the exit briefing.
■ The County Auditor will be seeking clarification from senior staff at the State Auditor's Office
in Olympia regarding financial reporting responsibilities for Library Capital Facility Areas due
ta the conflicdng opinions about the appropriate entity for that task.
■ Business manager Bill Sargent has been granted his license to practice as a Certified Public
Accountant from the State Board of Accountanry, an upgrade to his previous status of being a
CPA certifieate holder.
03/16/06 mjtiv
Page 5 of 5
.
AN ECONOMIC {MPACT & MARKEI" RESEARCH STUDY
Spokane County Interstate Fair
September 9-18, 2005
Spokane County Fair & Expo Center
Report Preoared for
Ms. Dolly Hughes, Oirector
Spokane County Fair & Expo Center
port Prepared b)C
B~e
Sport Business Interests
Chris Frye, Ph.D.
Consultant
' (509) 869-0299
chris@sportbusinessinterests.com
www.sportbusinessinterests.com
.
; • ,a~:;.v~, .
, 5pon Business Intueris ,
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Executive Summary Page 2
Introduction & Methodology Page 3
Econornic Impact Page 4
General Analysis Page 5
Who Were the Attendees? Page 5
Where Did They Come From? Page 6
Event Satisfaction Pa9e 7
Pro's & Con's Page 8
The Facifity Page 9
Concessions Quality Page 10
Event Awareness Page 10
Vendor Information Page 11
Vendor Opinions of Facility & Event Page 12
Vendor Accommodations 8 Spending Page 13
Survey Instruments
~ - f'age I
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY As a resuft of conducting survey research on four occasions (September 9,10,13, and 14, 2005); the following
observations were made regarding the Spokane County lnterstate Fair hosted at the Spokane County Fair & Expo Center.
The purpose for cvnducting this research was to establish a"snapshot" regarding participant demographics, quality
analysis, and economic impact of the event.
General 4bservations:
• The 10-day event attracted 193,301 • An overwhelming 91 % of attendees intend to
attendees and 253 vendors. return in 2006.
• The total indirect economic impact 0 88% of the attendees agree or strongly agree
stemming from non-resident spending as a that the host facility is in excellent condition.
result of hosting the event was • The greatest recommendation for facility
$6,051,393. improvement from the attendees is to have
• Non-resident attendees stayed in the better parking.
Spokane area for an average of 2 days. • 54% of the attendees learned of the event
• Non-resident vendors stayed in the through "word of mouth,"
Spokane area for an average of 11.5 days. 0 79% of the vendors intend to return to this
• Females represented 56% of the attendee event in 2006.
population. 0 83% of the vendors agree or strongly agree
• The greatest representation came from the that the host facility is in excellent condition.
18-24 years-of-age and the $20,000- 0 The greatest recommendation by the vendors
$49,999 annual household income is to have more entertainment.
demographics. o The greatest utilized means of overnight
• Of those in attendance, the most common accornmodations by vendors was hotel/motel
occupation was "retired" and (37%).
"rnedicaUhealth care."
Fagc ?
~
, !ipon ousmess interests ,
INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLOGY
On four separate occasions (September 9, 10, 13, and 14) at the Spokane County Fair & Expo Center, Sport Business
Interests (SBI) initiated a study utilizing surriey research on location at the 2005 Spokane County Interstate Fair_ The
purpose for conducting this research was to establish a"snapshoY' regarding participant demographics, quality anafysis,
and economic impact as it reiated to the event.
1n addition to ana{yzing this event for the above stated purposes, the results of this study will be utilized in conducting a
one-year economic impact and market analysis of the Spokane County Fair & Expo Center. The one year study will
consist of five independent studies representing five different event categories, as .categorized by the Spokane County
Fair 8 Expo Center staff. These results wi!{ then be app4ied to like events hosted at the facility during the 2005 calendar
year. This study represents the "Interstate Faie' category.
Two surveys were utilized to collect the data. The first survey was a 21-question survey designed for distribution to the
paying attendees/customers. SBI utilized a simple random sampling technique in order ta gather the data. S61 was able to
distribute and collect 317 completed and usable sunreys.
The second survey was a 10-question survey designed for distribution to the vendors. The survey was randomly
distributed to 150 vendor groups. SBI was able to callect 69 completed and usable surveys.
The surveys were then coded and analyzed utilizing an SPSS statistical software package.
It was SBI's intent to keep this report simple to read and reference. If anything is unclear, please feel free to contact the
researcher responsible for the study.
1'age 3
apon nuskness imrrrsiN
ECONOMIC IMPACT
The Spokane County Fair & Expo Center was the host facility for the Spokane County Interstate Fair. The ten-day
(September 9-18, 2005) event attracted approximately 193,301 attendees. As a result of hosting this event, the
Spokane County community was the recipient of approximabely $6,051,393. Economic Impact is defined as the net
change in the host economy as a result of nonresident spending attributed to a specific event.
- , This event can be divided into two primary audiences: the
attendee and the vendor.
Economic Impact Calcu4ation
Attendee
Group Impact Residents made up 80% (154,641) of the 193,301
attendees, but they are not included in the economic
Attendees impact calculation as per the above, stated definition. For
Residents (154,641) None this study, a resident is defined as one who lives within 30
Non-Residents (38,660 x$50.73 x 2) $3.9M miles of downtown Spokane. Non-residents made up the
($3,922,444) remaining 38,660 (20%) attendees. The non-resident
Vendors attendee per day per person spending was $50.73 and
Res+dents (147) None they stayed in Spokane for an average of 2 days.
Non-Residents
(106 x 3.1 x$29.59 x 11.5) $111,818 Vendor
For the same reason as the resident attendees, the
Direct Economic Impact = $4,034,262 resident vendors (147; 58°/a) were not included in the
economic impact calculation either. Regarding the non-
Sales Multiplier x 1.5" resident vendors (106; 42%), each vendor consisted of 3.1
people, had a per person per day spending average of
$6,051,393 $29.59, and stayed in Spokane for an average of 11.5
days.
Total Indirect Economic Impact
$6,051,393
' Coughlin, C.C. 8 Mandelbaum, T.B. (1991). A ConsumeYs Guide to Reyronel
Ecortomic Mul[rpfoers. Federal Resenre 8ank Cf St. Loula (73).
J
F'agc 4
Spon Busincss Intertsts • .
GENERAL ANALYSIS .
WHO WERE THE ATTENDEES?
1) Gender: Females represented 56°l0 of the population with males representing the remaining 44%.
2) Age: The greatest percentage of attendees represented the 18-24 (26%) and the 45-54 (23°Io) year age
groups (49% combined).
A e in ears) Percentaae
18-24 26%
25-34 21 °!o 35-44 11 %
45-54 23%
55-64 14%
65+ 05%
100%
3) Income: The greatest percentage of household incomes existed ir► the $20,000 to $49,999 per year rar►ge.
Household Income Percentaae
< Than $19,999 18%
$20,000 to $49,999 35%
$50,000 to $79,000 30%
$80,000 + 09%
No Response 08%
100%
4) Occupation: uRetired" and "health care/medical" were the most common occupation of the attendees.
#1. Retired (16%) #6. Hospitality (7%)
#2. Health Care/Medical (16%) V. Homemaker (7%)
#3, Trade (14%) #8. Education (6%)
#4. Student (11 #9. Govt./Federal(4%)
#5. Sales (10%) #10. Management (3°fo)
Page 5
Spcxt Busmess lmcrests .
WHERE DID THEY COME FROM?
Fi41R ATTENDEES
sp/o
11%
■ LOG4L a D4YTRtPPERS D P10NFiESIDEMS ~i
LOCAL (80%) = Ali attendees who live within 30 miles of the fairgrounds (Spokane).
Spokane, Spokane Va!ley, Cheney, Deer Park, Mead, Nine Mile Falls, Veradale,
Greenacres, Ofis Orchar+ds, Liberty Lake, Medica! Lake, etc.
DAYTRIPPERS (11°la) = A11 attendees who live in North Idaho and Eastern Washington (within 1-2 hours drive).
NONRESIDENTS (9°l0) = AI{ others.
Page 6
, • . ' • ' Sport Business Intcrests .
EVENT SATISFACTION
1) Will Be Attending
Next Year? When asked whether or not they would return next year, an overwhelming 91 % of the '
attendees responded YES. Of the remaining 9%, 5% responded NO and 4% were uncertain.
YES = 91 %
NO = 5%
UNCERTAIN = 4%
2} Why Not? The reasons listed for not attending next year are:
1. Not enough varietylentertainment,
2. Too busy.
3. Not in town (nonresident).
Page ?
-
Spon Busincss Intcrests PRO'S 8 CON'S
1) Favorite Vendvr or Exhibit: When asked what part of the event was their favorite, the following responses were
recorded:
Vendor or Exhibit Percentaae
# 1 Animals/Livestock 18%
# 2 No Response 17%
# 3 Food 11 %
# 4 Main BuildingNendors 09%
# 5 Cars/Motorcycles/Trucks 07°!0 .
# 6 Art Exhibits 06%
# 7 A{I/Everything/No Favorite 05%
# 8 Flowers 05%
# 9 Dietks Bent4ey 04%
#10 All other responses
(no single response equaling more than 2%) 18%
100%
2) Room for Improvement: When asked what could be done to improve the event, the below responses were
recorded.
Improvement Percentaqe
# 1 No Response 25%
# 2 Nothing/Don't Change 22%
# 3 More Entertainment 11 %
# 4 More BoothsNendorsNariety 06°l0
# 5 Better Parking 05%
# 6 Better Food VendorslMore Variety 05%
# 7 Lower Prices 04%
# 8 All other responses
(no single response equaling more than 2°!0) 22°l0
100%
Pngc 8
Spon l3usmcsti '.ntcrcsrs .
I
THE FACILITY
1. Facility Quality: When asked about the quality of the facility, the attendees responded favorably.
I found the quality of the Spokane County Fair & Expo Center facilitu to be excellent... .
A. Strongly Disagree 04%
B. Disagree 00%
C. Undecided 08%
D. Agree 53%
E. Strongly Agree 35%
99%
2} Facility Improvements: When asked what one thing could be done to improve the facility, the attendees responded
with the following recommendations.
Imnrovements Percentaae
No Response 42%
Nothing/Don't Change 11 %
6etter Parking/Paved 10%
Continue w/Current Improvements 06%
More Restroom s/C leaner 05%
More Vendors/BoothsNariety 04%
Friendlier Service 04%
More Food 03%
All other responses
(no single response equaling more than 2%) 15%
100%
I'sg; 9
. JytwPUS«caa mczcaa . I
CONCESSIONS QUAI.ITY . .
1) Concessions Quality: When asked about the quality of the food concessions, the attendees responded favorably.
I found the quality of the conoessions (food) at this event to be excellent......
A. Strongly Disagree 04%
B. Disagree 02%
C. Undecided 12%
D. Agree 56%
E. Strongly Agree 23%
97%
EVENT AWARENESS
1) Event Awareness: When asked about which medium made them aware of the event, the attendees responded:
A. Billboard 07%
B. Television 32%
C. Radio 04%
D. Newspaper 02%
E. Word of Mouth 54%
99%
Page 10
VENDOR INFORMATION
1) Vendor Size: The mean number of peaple that worlced each vendor booth was 3.1.
2) Vendor Length of Stay: Of those vendors categorized as non-residents (106) and requiring overnight accommodations,
the mean stay in the Spokane vicinity was 11.5 days.
3} Past Attendance: One-quarter {25°!0} of all vendors in attendance were first time vendors.
Number of Times Attended the Event Percentaae
First Year 25%
Second Year 13%
Third Year 49% -
Fourth Year 12%
5 Years 10%
fi-9 Years 12%
10+ Years 19%
100%
4) Will Be Attending
Next Year? When asked whether or not they would return next year, 79% of the vendors responded YES.
Of the remaining 21 6% responded tV0 and 15% were uncertain.
The unanimous reasons for either definiteiy or possibly not returning for next year's event
were:
1) Low number of booths
2) Wrong demographic/target audience
3) Na exclusivity
4) Poor sales
5) Going to different fair
fi) Too long
7) Too high of an admission fee
8) Economic reasons
Pugc l r
. Sport I3usincss Imcrcsti ,
VENDOR OPINIONS OF FACILITY 8► EVENT
1) Faciiiry Quality: When asked about the quality of the facility, the vendors responded favorably.
l found the quatity of the Spokane County Fair & Expo Center facilitrLto be excellent....
A. Strongly Disagree 01 %
8. Disagree OC%
C. Undecided 10%
D. Agree 51 %
E. Strongly Agree 32%
100%
2) Event Improvements: When asked what one thing could be done to improve the event, the vendors responded with
the following recommendations.
Improvements Percentaqe
No Response 15%
No Change Needed 15°/a
More entertainment in grandstands 09%
Lower fees for vendors and attendees 09%
Improve trafficlparking access 07%
More Restrooms 05%
Better directional signage (restrooms, ATM, etc) 05%
Exclusivity 04%
More food vendors/variety 04%
Free coffee/water delivery 03%
More group days 03%
Other responses 21 °lo
100°!0
Pagc 12
SpOA Business lnlcrrsis .
VENDOR ACCOMMODATIONS & SPENDING
1; Accommodations: When non-resident vendors were asked about overnight accommodations, they responded
that they utilized a:
A. Hotel/Motel 37%
B. RV/Campground 24%
C. Friends/Family 28%
D. Other 11 %
100%
~
2) Spending Patterns: As previously stated, the average vendor group impacted the local economy $29.59 per
person per day.
Below is the breakdown: I
Food Spending = $469*
Lodging Spending = $301'
Misc. Spending = $286"
$1,056 per group per the entire event
$1,056/11.5 (avg. # of days in Spokane) _ $91.83
$92/3.1 (avg. # of individuals per group) _ $29.00
Per person per day spending for non-resident vendors =$29.59
~~~C 13
ECONOMIC IMPACT & MARKET RESEARCH STUDY
Spokane County Fair & Expo Center
Attendee Survey
Spokane County Interstate Fair
September 9-18, 2005
. ,
Ptease complete both sides of the survey (front & back) ta the best of your ability. Thank You!
1. What is your zip code?
2. UVhat is your gender? (please circle) M F
3. What is your age? (please circle ) 18-24 25-34
35-44 45-54
55-64 65+
4. What is your annual household income? Less than $19,999
$20,000-$49,999
. $ 50, 000-$79, 999
$80,000 or more
No Response
5. What is your occupation?
6. How many times have you attended this event?
7. Do you plan on attending this event next year ? YES NO
8. If your response is NO to question #7, why not?
9. What is your favorite exhibit at this year's event?
10. What recommendation would you make to improve this event?
11. I found the quality of the Spokane County Fair & Expo Center facilitK to be excellent....
A. Strongiy disagree
B. Disagree
C. Undecided
D. Agree
E. Strongly Agree
i
. i yuu-uuutu iucunnmelmune rmNrUVfcmenr ror uje ~poKane l:ounnl rair a~ txpo Lenter, wnat
' woufd it be?
13: i found the quality of the concessions (food) at this event to be excellent...
A. Strongly disagree
B. Disagree
C. Undecided ' .
D. Agree
E. Strongly Agree
14. How did you hear about this event?
- A. Billboard
B. Television
C. Radio
D. Newspaper
E. Word of mouth
. F. Other
Onlv comp{ete this section if you are an out-of-town visitor! : The sun►ey re-
- sponses wi11 b4
~ 1. How many people are in your travel group (please include yourself)? kept conftdential b
will only be utilised
to evaluate eco-
: 2. Please list the estimated amount your group will spend during your stay in ~ nomic impact b
Spokane in the following categories: : marketirrg concorns
regarding the fair 8
Expo Center. None
A. Food Grocery Stores M this information
Convenience Stores wju be utilized for
Fast Food/Concessions any oth4r reasons.
Restaurants It you have any
quvatlons, please
contact Chris at
B. Ladging 5 0 9-86 9-0 299.
Thank yau for your
C. Miscellaneous assistanco.
; 3. How many days do you anticipate staying in Spokane?
:4. If you will be staying the night in Spokane, where will you be staying?
A. HoteUMotel
B. RVlCampground
- C. Friends/Family
~
D_ Other
: SPC)1-tT BLSINESS
IN`l'F,RESTS
ECONOMIC IMPACT & MARKET RESEARCH STUDY
Spokane County Fair & Expo Center
Vendor Survey . - ~ - ~
Spokane County Interstate Fair
September 9-18, 2005 I
Please complete the survey to the best of your ability. Thank You!
1. What is your zip code?
2. How many times have you attended this event?
3. Do you plan on attending this event next year ? YES NO
4. If your response is NO to question #3, why not?
5. I found the quality of the Spokane County Fair & Expo Center facilitv to be excellent....
A. Strongly disagree
B. Disagree
C. Undecided
D. Agree
E. Strongly Agree
6. How many people are in your traveUvendor group (please include yourself)?
7. Please list the estimated dollar amount your group will spend during your stay in
Spokane in the following categories:
A. Food Grocery Stores
Convenience Stores
Fast Food/Concessions
Restaurants
B. Lodging
C. Transportation (fuel) _ _ .
D. Entertainment T1%
E. Miscellaneous
8. How many days do you anticipate staying in Spokane?
9: If you will be staying the night in Spokane, where will you be staying?
~ '{~.4•..t' ,i~.
A. HotellMotel
~ , .
B. RV/Campground ~ 7 . ~ ~ ~ '
thi5:-t(1~~1'Ittat~+Dn
C. Friends/Family uti iz~ far a 3~!
D Other Y
10. If you could make ONE recommendation to improve this event, what q~
Nould it be? _..~.'t~~~y
~
t~ biiAs at:~`~.
r h;.
0299 ThaAk yt~~l p!r
assistance.